UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORMFORM 10-K

 

[X]

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20122013

OR

 

[    ]

  

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Transition Period From                          to                              

Commission File Number1-6541

LOEWS CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware  13-2646102    

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

  13-2646102
(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer    

incorporation or organization)

Identification No.)

667 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y.10065-8087

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(212)(212) 521-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

   Title of each class   

   

    Name of each exchange on which registered    

Loews Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share  New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes            X                                                 No     

YesXNo

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes                                             No            X        

Yes   No           X        

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes            X                                                 No     

Yes           X        No   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes            X                                                 No     

Yes           X        No   

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ].

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer      X      Accelerated filer                Non-accelerated filer                  Smaller reporting company              

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes                                             No            X        

Yes   No           X        

The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $12,707,000,000.$13,578,000,000.

As of February 15, 2013,14, 2014, there were 391,885,833387,403,380 shares of Loews common stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement intended to be filed by Registrant with the Commission prior to April 30, 20132014 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.

 

 

 


LOEWS CORPORATION

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON

FORM 10-K FILED WITH THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

For the Year Ended December 31, 20122013

 

ItemItem  Page      Page 
No.   PART I   No.    PART I  No. 

1

  

Business

    

Business

  
  

CNA Financial Corporation

       

CNA Financial Corporation

   3  
  

Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.

       

Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.

   8  
  

Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP

   12     

Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP

   12  
  

HighMount Exploration & Production LLC

   15     

HighMount Exploration & Production LLC

   15  
  

Loews Hotels Holding Corporation

   20     

Loews Hotels Holding Corporation

   21  
  

Executive Officers of the Registrant

   21     

Executive Officers of the Registrant

   22  
  

Available Information

   22     

Available Information

   23  

1A

  

Risk Factors

   22     

Risk Factors

   23  

1B

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

   43     

Unresolved Staff Comments

   46  

2

  

Properties

   43     

Properties

   46  

3

  

Legal Proceedings

   43     

Legal Proceedings

   46  

4

  

Mine Safety Disclosures

   43     

Mine Safety Disclosures

   46  
  PART II    PART II  

5

  

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   44     

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   47  

6

  

Selected Financial Data

   46     

Selected Financial Data

   49  

7

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   47     

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   50  

7A

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

   94     

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

   98  

8

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   98     

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   102  

9

  

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   177     

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   182  

9A

  

Controls and Procedures

   177     

Controls and Procedures

   182  

9B

  

Other Information

   177     

Other Information

   182  
  PART III    PART III  
  

Certain information called for by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) has been omitted as Registrant intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the close of its fiscal year a definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to Regulation 14A.

    Certain information called for by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) has been omitted as Registrant intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the close of its fiscal year a definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to Regulation 14A.  
  PART IV    PART IV  

15

  

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

   178     

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

   183  

PART I

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Report to “Loews Corporation,” “we,” “our,” “us” or like terms refer to the business of Loews Corporation excluding its subsidiaries.

Item 1. Business.

We are a holding company. Our subsidiaries are engaged in the following lines of business:

 

  

commercial property and casualty insurance (CNA Financial Corporation, a 90% owned subsidiary);

 

  

operation of offshore oil and gas drilling rigs (Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., a 50.4% owned subsidiary);

 

  

transportation and storage of natural gas and natural gas liquids and gathering and processing of natural gas (Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, a 55%53% owned subsidiary);

 

  

exploration, production and marketing of natural gas and oil (including condensate and natural gas liquids), (HighMount Exploration & Production LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary); and

 

  

operation of a chain of hotels (Loews Hotels Holding Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary).

Please read information relating to our major business segments from which we derive revenue and income contained in Note 2021 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included under Item 8.

CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CNA Financial Corporation (together with its subsidiaries, “CNA”) was incorporated in 1967 and is an insurance holding company. CNA’s property and casualty and remaining life & group insurance operations are primarily conducted by Continental Casualty Company (“CCC”), incorporated in 1897, and The Continental Insurance Company (“CIC”), organized in 1853, and certain other affiliates. CIC became a subsidiary of CNA in 1995 as a result of the acquisition of The Continental Corporation (“Continental”). CNA accounted for 65.6%67.2%, 63.4%65.6% and 63.0%63.4% of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

CNA’s insurance products primarily include commercial property and casualty coverages, including surety. CNA’s services include risk management, information services, warranty and claims administration. CNA’s products and services are primarily marketed through independent agents, brokers and managing general underwriters to a wide variety of customers, including small, medium and large businesses, insurance companies, associations, professionals and other groups.

CNA’s property and casualty field structure consists of 49 underwriting locations across the United States. In addition, there are five centralized processing operations which handle policy processing, billing and collection activities, and also act as call centers to optimize service. The claims structure consists of two regional claim centers designed to efficiently handle the high volume of low severity claims including property damage, liability, and workers’ compensation medical only claims, and 16 principal claim offices handling the more complex claims. In addition, CNA has underwriting and claim capabilities in Canada and Europe.

CNA Specialty

CNA Specialty includes the following business groups:

ProfessionalManagement & ManagementProfessional Liability:  ProfessionalManagement & ManagementProfessional Liability provides management and professional liability insurance and risk management services and other specialized property and casualty coverages in the United States. This group provides professional liability coverages to various professional firms, including architects, real estate agents, small and mid-sized accounting firms, law firms and technologyother professional firms. ProfessionalManagement & ManagementProfessional Liability also provides directors and officers (“D&O”), employment practices, fiduciary and fidelity coverages. Specific areas of focus include small and mid-size firms, public as well as privately

held firms and not-for-profit

organizations, where tailored products for thisthese client segmentsegments are offered. Products within ProfessionalManagement & ManagementProfessional Liability are distributed through brokers, independent agents and managing general underwriters. ProfessionalManagement & ManagementProfessional Liability, through CNA HealthPro, also offers insurance products to serve the health care industry. Products include professional and general liability andas well as associated standard property and casualty coverages, and are distributed on a national basis through brokers, independent agents and managing general underwriters. Key customer segments include long term careaging services, allied medical facilities, allied health care providers, life sciences, dental professionalsdentists, doctors, hospitals, and mid-sizenurses and large health care facilities.other medical practitioners.

International:  International provides similar management and professional liability insurance and other specialized property and casualty coverages, through similar distribution channels, in Canada and Europe.

Surety:  Surety offers small, medium and large contract and commercial surety bonds. CNA Surety provides surety and fidelity bonds in all 50 states through a network of independent agencies. On June 10, 2011, CNA completed the acquisition of the noncontrolling interestinterests of CNA Surety.

Warranty and Alternative Risks:Warranty and Alternative Risks provides extended service contracts and related products that provide protection from the financial burden associated with mechanical breakdown and other related losses, primarily for vehicles and portable electronic communication devices.

CNA Commercial

CNA Commercial’s property products include standard and excess property coverages, as well as marine coverage, and boiler and machinery. Casualty products include standard casualty insurance products such as workers’ compensation, general and product liability, commercial auto and umbrella coverages. Most insurance programs are provided on a guaranteed cost basis; however, CNA also offers specialized loss-sensitive insurance programs to those customers viewed as higher risk and less predictable in exposure.

These property and casualty products are offered as part of CNA’sSmall Business, Commercial andInternational insurance groups. CNA’s Small Business insurance group serves its smaller commercial accounts and the Commercial insurance group serves CNA’s middle markets and its larger risks. In addition, CNA Commercial provides total risk management services relating to claim and information services to the large commercial insurance marketplace, through a wholly owned subsidiary, CNA ClaimPlus, Inc., a third party administrator. CNA also provides specialized insurance to customers who are generally viewed as higher risk and less predictable in exposure than those covered by standard insurance markets. The International insurance group primarily consists of the commercial product lines of CNA’s operations in Europe and Canada. During the fourth quarter of 2011, CNA sold its 50% ownership interest in First Insurance Company of Hawaii (“FICOH”).

Also included in CNA Commercial isCNA Select Risk (“Select Risk”), which includes CNA’s excess and surplus lines coverages. Select Risk provides specialized insurance for selected commercial risks on both an individual customer and program basis. Customers insured by Select Risk are generally viewed as higher risk and less predictable in exposure than those covered by standard insurance markets. Select Risk’s products are distributed throughout the United States through specialist producers, program agents and brokers.Hardy

Hardy

In July of 2012, CNA completed the acquisition of Hardy Underwriting Bermuda Limited (“Hardy”), is a specialized Lloyd’s of London (“Lloyd’s”) underwriter. Through Lloyd’s Syndicate 382, Hardy underwrites primarily short-tail exposures in the following coverages: Marine & Aviationprovides coverage for a variety of large risks including energy, cargo and specie, marine hull and general aviation.Non-Marine Property comprises direct and facultative property, including construction insurance of industrial and commercial risks (heavy industry, general manufacturing and commercial property portfolios), together with residential and small commercial risks.Property Treaty Reinsurance offers catastrophe reinsurance on an excess of loss basis, proportional treaty and excess of loss coverages and crop reinsurance.Specialty Lines offers coverage for a variety of risks including political violence, accident and health and financial institutions.

Life & Group Non-Core

Life & Group Non-Core primarily includes the results of the life and group lines of business that are in run-off. CNA continues to service its existing individual long term care commitments, its payout annuity business and its pension deposit business. CNA also retains a block of group reinsurance and life settlement contracts. These businesses are being managed as a run-off operation. CNA’s group long term care business, while considered non-core, continues to accept new employees in existing groups.

Other

Other primarily includes certain CNA corporate expenses, including interest on CNA corporate debt, and the results of certain property and casualty business in run-off, including CNA Re and asbestos and environmental pollution (“A&EP”). In 2010, CNA ceded substantially all of its legacy A&EP liabilities under the Loss Portfolio Transfer, as further discussed in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

Direct Written Premiums by Geographic Concentration

Set forth below is the distribution of CNA’s direct written premiums by geographic concentration.

 

Year Ended December 31  2012                 2011                 2010       2013           2012           2011           

 

California

   9.5    9.4    9.3      9.2%       9.5%       9.4%      

Texas

   7.4      6.7      6.5        8.0           7.4           6.7          

New York

   7.1      6.7      6.8        7.3           7.1           6.7          

Illinois

   6.5      4.9      4.0        5.9           6.5           4.9          

Florida

   5.8      6.1      6.1        5.9           5.8           6.1          

New Jersey

   3.5      3.5      3.5        3.7           3.5           3.5          

Pennsylvania

   3.4      3.4      3.4        3.7           3.4           3.4          

Canada

   3.0      3.0      2.9        3.1           3.0           3.0          

All other states, countries or political subdivisions

   53.8      56.3      57.5        53.2           53.8           56.3          

 
   100.0    100.0    100.0      100.0%       100.0%       100.0%      

 

Approximately 9.2%8.9%, 8.8%9.2% and 6.9%8.8% of CNA’s direct written premiums were derived from outside of the United States for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

Property and Casualty Claim and Claim Adjustment Expenses

The following loss reserve development table illustrates the change over time of reserves established for property and casualty claim and claim adjustment expenses at the end of the preceding ten calendar years for CNA’s property and casualty insurance companies. The table excludes CNA’s life insurance subsidiaries, and as such, the carried reserves will not agree to the Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8. The first section shows the reserves as originally reported at the end of the stated year. The second section, reading down, shows the cumulative amounts paid as of the end of successive years with respect to the originally reported reserve liability. The third section, reading down, shows re-estimates of the originally recorded reserves as of the end of each successive year, which is the result of CNA’s property and casualty insurance subsidiaries’ expanded awareness of additional facts and circumstances that pertain to the unsettled claims. The last section compares the latest re-estimated reserves to the reserves originally established, and indicates whether the original reserves were adequate or inadequate to cover the estimated costs of unsettled claims.

The loss reserve development table is cumulative and, therefore, ending balances should not be added since the amount at the end of each calendar year includes activity for both the current and prior years. The development amounts in the table below include the impact of reinsurance commutations, but exclude the impact of the allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance receivables.

 

 Schedule of Loss Reserve Development   Schedule of Loss Reserve Development 

 

 
Year Ended December 31 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010(a) 2011 2012(b)    2003   2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010(a)    2011   2012(b)   2013 

 

 
(In millions of dollars)                                                                   

Originally reported gross reserves for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses

  25,719    31,284    31,204    30,694    29,459    28,415    27,475    26,712    25,412    24,228    24,696      31,284      31,204      30,694      29,459      28,415      27,475      26,712     25,412      24,228     24,696        24,015   

Originally reported ceded recoverable

  10,490    13,847    13,682    10,438    8,078    6,945    6,213    5,524    6,060    4,967    5,075      13,847      13,682      10,438      8,078      6,945      6,213      5,524     6,060      4,967     5,075        4,911   

 

 

Originally reported net reserves for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses

  15,229    17,437    17,522    20,256    21,381    21,470    21,262    21,188    19,352    19,261    19,621      17,437      17,522      20,256      21,381      21,470      21,262      21,188     19,352      19,261     19,621        19,104   

 

 

Cumulative net paid as of:

                                 

One year later

  5,373    4,382    2,651    3,442    4,436    4,308    3,930    3,762    3,472    4,277         4,382      2,651      3,442      4,436      4,308      3,930      3,762     3,472      4,277     4,588          

Two years later

  8,768    6,104    4,963    7,022    7,676    7,127    6,746    6,174    6,504    -         6,104      4,963      7,022      7,676      7,127      6,746      6,174     6,504      7,459     -          

Three years later

  9,747    7,780    7,825    9,620    9,822    9,102    8,340    8,374    -    -         7,780      7,825      9,620      9,822      9,102      8,340      8,374     8,822      -     -          

Four years later

  10,870    10,085    9,914    11,289    11,312    10,121    9,863    -    -    -         10,085      9,914      11,289      11,312      10,121      9,863      10,038          -     -          

Five years later

  12,814    11,834    11,261    12,465    11,973    11,262    -    -    -    -         11,834      11,261      12,465      11,973      11,262      11,115      -          -     -          

Six years later

  14,320    12,988    12,226    12,917    12,858    -    -    -    -    -         12,988      12,226      12,917      12,858      12,252           -          -     -          

Seven years later

  15,291    13,845    12,551    13,680    -    -    -    -    -    -         13,845      12,551      13,680      13,670                -          -     -          

Eight years later

  16,022    14,073    13,245    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         14,073      13,245      14,409                     -          -     -          

Nine years later

  16,180    14,713    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         14,713      13,916                          -          -     -          

Ten years later

  16,754    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         15,337                               -          -     -          

Net reserves re-estimated as of:

                                 

End of initial year

  15,229    17,437    17,522    20,256    21,381    21,470    21,262    21,188    19,352    19,261    19,621      17,437      17,522      20,256      21,381      21,470      21,262      21,188     19,352      19,261     19,621        19,104   

One year later

  17,650    17,671    18,513    20,588    21,601    21,463    21,021    20,643    18,923    19,081         17,671      18,513      20,588      21,601      21,463      21,021      20,643     18,923      19,081     19,506          

Two years later

  18,248    19,120    19,044    20,975    21,706    21,259    20,472    20,237    18,734    -         19,120      19,044      20,975      21,706      21,259      20,472      20,237     18,734      18,946     -          

Three years later

  19,814    19,760    19,631    21,408    21,609    20,752    20,014    20,012    -    -         19,760      19,631      21,408      21,609      20,752      20,014      20,012     18,514      -     -          

Four years later

  20,384    20,425    20,212    21,432    21,286    20,350    19,784    -    -    -         20,425      20,212      21,432      21,286      20,350      19,784      19,758          -     -          

Five years later

  21,076    21,060    20,301    21,326    20,982    20,155    -    -    -    -         21,060      20,301      21,326      20,982      20,155      19,597      -          -     -          

Six years later

  21,769    21,217    20,339    21,060    20,815    -    -    -    -    -         21,217      20,339      21,060      20,815      20,021           -          -     -          

Seven years later

  21,974    21,381    20,142    20,926    -    -    -    -    -    -         21,381      20,142      20,926      20,755                -          -     -          

Eight years later

  22,168    21,199    20,023    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         21,199      20,023      20,900                     -          -     -          

Nine years later

  22,016    21,100    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         21,100      20,054                          -          -     -          

Ten years later

  21,922    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         21,135                               -          -     -          

 

 

Total net (deficiency) redundancy

  (6,693  (3,663  (2,501  (670  566    1,315    1,478    1,176    618    180         (3,698)     (2,532)     (644)     626      1,449      1,665      1,430     838      315     115          

 

 

Reconciliation to gross re-estimated reserves:

                                 

Net reserves re-estimated

  21,922    21,100    20,023    20,926    20,815    20,155    19,784    20,012    18,734    19,081         21,135     20,054     20,900     20,755     20,021     19,597     19,758    18,514     18,946    19,506          

Re-estimated ceded recoverable

  16,903    15,273    14,131    11,455    9,131    7,728    6,686    6,032    6,536    5,316         15,852     14,706     12,025     9,697     8,293     7,252     6,593    7,093     5,850    5,531          

 

 

Total gross re-estimated reserves

  38,825    36,373    34,154    32,381    29,946    27,883    26,470    26,044    25,270    24,397         36,987     34,760     32,925     30,452     28,314     26,849     26,351    25,607     24,796    25,037          

 

 

Total gross (deficiency) redundancy

  (13,106  (5,089  (2,950  (1,687  (487  532    1,005    668    142    (169       (5,703)    (3,556)    (2,231)    (993)    101    626     361    (195)     (568)     (341)         

 

 

Net (deficiency) redundancy related to:

                                 

Asbestos

  (827  (177  (123  (113  (112  (107  (79  -    -    -         (177)    (123)     (113)     (112)     (107)     (79)     -          -     -          

Environmental pollution

  (282  (209  (209  (159  (159  (159  (76  -    -    -         (209)    (209)     (159)     (159)     (159)     (76)     -          -     -          

 

 

Total asbestos and environmental pollution

  (1,109  (386  (332  (272  (271  (266  (155  -    -    -         (386)    (332)     (272)     (271)     (266)     (155)     -          -     -          

Core (Non-asbestos and environmental pollution)

  (5,584  (3,277  (2,169  (398  837    1,581    1,633    1,176    618    180         (3,312)    (2,200)    (372)    897     1,715     1,820     1,430    838     315    115          

 

 

Total net (deficiency) redundancy

  (6,693  (3,663  (2,501  (670  566    1,315    1,478    1,176    618    180         (3,698)    (2,532)    (644)    626     1,449     1,665     1,430    838     315    115          

 

 

 

(a)

Effective January 1, 2010, CNA ceded approximately $1.5 billion ofits net asbestos and environmental pollution claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves relating to its continuing operations under a retroactive reinsurance agreement with an aggregate limit of $4.0 billion, as further discussed in Note 89 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

(b)

On July 2, 2012, CNA acquired Hardy. As a result of this acquisition, net reserves were increased by $291 million. Further information on this acquisition is included in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

Please read information relating to CNA’s property and casualty claim and claim adjustment expense reserves and reserve development set forth under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”), and in Notes 1 and 89 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included under Item 8.

Investments

Please read Item 7, MD&A – Investments and Notes 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included under Item 8.

Other

Competition:The property and casualty insurance industry is highly competitive both as to rate and service. CNA competes with a large number of stock and mutual insurance companies and other entities for both distributors and customers. Insurers compete on the basis of factors including products, price, services, ratings and financial strength. CNA must continuously allocate resources to refine and improve its insurance products and services.

There are approximately 2,800 individual companies that sell property and casualty insurance in the United States. Based on 20112012 statutory net written premiums, CNA is the seventheighth largest commercial insurance writer and the 13th largest property and casualty insurance organization in the United States.

Regulation:  The insurance industry is subject to comprehensive and detailed regulation and supervision. Each domestic and foreign jurisdiction has established supervisory agencies with broad administrative powers relative to licensing insurers and agents, approving policy forms, establishing reserve requirements, prescribing the form and content of statutory financial reports, and regulating capital adequacy and the type, quality and amount of investments permitted. Such regulatory powers also extend to premium rate regulations, which require that rates not be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory. In addition to regulation of dividends by insurance subsidiaries, intercompany transfers of assets may be subject to prior notice or approval by insurance regulators, depending on the size of such transfers and payments in relation to the financial position of the insurance subsidiaries making the transfer or payment.

Hardy is also supervised by the Council of Lloyd’s, which is the franchisor for all Lloyd’s operations. The Council of Lloyd’s has wide discretionary powers to regulate Lloyd’s underwriting, such as establishing the capital requirements for syndicate participation. In addition, the annual business plans of each syndicate are subject to the review and approval of the Lloyd’s Franchise Board, which is responsible for business planning and monitoring for all syndicates.

The European Union’s executive body, the European Commission, is implementing new capital adequacy and risk management regulations called Solvency II that would apply to CNA’s European operations. In addition, global regulators, including the United States National Association of Insurance Commissioners, are working with the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (“IAIS”) to consider changes to insurance company supervision. Among the areas being addressed are company and group capital requirements, group supervision and enterprise risk management. It is not currently clear to what extent or how the activities of the IAIS will impact CNA or U.S. insurance regulation.

Domestic insurers are also required by the state insurance regulators to provide coverage to insureds who would not otherwise be considered eligible by the insurers. Each state dictates the types of insurance and the level of coverage that must be provided to such involuntary risks. CNA’s share of these involuntary risks is mandatory and generally a function of its respective share of the voluntary market by line of insurance in each state.

Further, insurance companies are subject to state guaranty fund and other insurance-related assessments. Guaranty fund assessments are levied by the state departments of insurance to cover claims of insolvent insurers. Other insurance-related assessments are generally levied by state agencies to fund various organizations including disaster relief funds, rating bureaus, insurance departments, and workers’ compensation second injury funds, or by industry organizations that assist in the statistical analysis and ratemaking process.

Although the federal government does not currently directly regulate the business of insurance, federal legislative and regulatory initiatives can impact the insurance industry in a variety of ways.industry. These initiatives and legislation include proposed federal oversight of certain insurers; tort reform proposals; proposals addressing natural catastrophe exposures; terrorism risk mechanisms; federal financial services reforms; and various tax proposals affecting insurance companies; and possiblecompanies. Any of the foregoing regulatory limitations, impositions and restrictions arising from the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as well as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, both enactedmay result in 2010.significant burdens on CNA.

Various legislative and regulatory efforts to reform the tort liability system have, and will continue to, impact CNA’s industry. Although there has been some tort reform with positive impact to the insurance industry, new causes of action and theories of damages continue to be proposed in state court actions or by federal or state legislatures that continue to expand liability for insurers and their policyholders. For example, some state legislatures have from time to time considered legislation addressing direct actions against insurers related to bad faith claims. As a result of this unpredictability in the law, insurance underwriting is expected to continue to be difficult in commercial lines, professional liability and other specialty coverages.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act expanded the federal presence in insurance oversight and may increase the regulatory requirements to which CNA may be subject. The Act’s requirements include streamlining the state-based regulation of reinsurance and nonadmitted insurance (property or casualty insurance placed from insurers that are eligible to accept insurance, but are not licensed to write insurance in a particular state). The Act also established a new Federal Insurance Office within the U.S. Department of the Treasury. The Act called for numerous studies and contemplates further regulation.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the related amendments in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act may increase CNA’s operating costs and underwriting losses. This landmark legislation may lead to numerous changes in the health care industry that could create additional operating costs for CNA, particularly with respect to its workers’ compensation and long term care products.

Properties:  The Chicago location houses CNA’s principal executive offices. CNA’s subsidiaries own or lease office space in various cities throughout the United States and in other countries. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to CNA’s principal office locations:

 

Location Size
(square feet)
     
Location (square feet)Principal Usage

 

333 S. Wabash Avenue
Chicago, Illinois

 639,553   732,332            Principal executive offices of CNA

Chicago, Illinois

     

Principal executive offices of CNA

401 Penn Street
Reading, Pennsylvania2405 Lucien Way

 113,084   169,941            Property and casualty insurance offices

Maitland, Florida

     

Property and casualty insurance offices

2405 Lucien Way
Maitland, Florida

111,724   

Property and casualty insurance offices

125 S. Broad Street

71,847           Property and casualty insurance offices

New York, New York

 68,935       

Property and casualty insurance offices

101 S. Reid Street

61,631           Property and casualty insurance offices

Sioux Falls, South Dakota

 64,789       

Property and casualty insurance offices

4150 N. Drinkwater Boulevard
Scottsdale, Arizona

 56,281               

Property and casualty insurance offices

600 N. Pearl Street
Dallas, TexasScottsdale, Arizona

50,088        

401 Penn Street

56,009   Property and casualty insurance offices

675 Placentia Avenue
Brea, CaliforniaReading, Pennsylvania

49,957        

Property and casualty insurance offices

4267 Meridian Parkway
Aurora, Illinois

46,903   

Data center

10375 Park Meadows Drive
Littleton, Colorado

 42,968   41,706            Property and casualty insurance offices

Littleton, Colorado

     

675 Placentia Avenue

41,340   Property and casualty insurance offices

Brea, California

700 N. Pearl Street

37,870           Property and casualty insurance offices

Dallas, Texas

1249 S. River Road

36,946           Property and casualty insurance offices

Cranbury, New Jersey

CNA leases its office space described above except for the buildingsbuilding in Chicago, Illinois, Reading, Pennsylvania and Aurora, Illinois, which areis owned.

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (“Diamond Offshore”) is engaged, through its subsidiaries, in the business of operating drilling rigs that are chartered on a contract basis for fixed terms by companies engaged in the exploration and production of hydrocarbons. Offshore rigs are mobile units that can be relocated based on market demand. Diamond Offshore accounted for 21.1%19.4%, 23.6%21.1% and 23.0%23.6% of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

Rigs:   Diamond Offshore owns 4445 offshore drilling rigs, consisting of 3233 semisubmersible rigs, seven jack-ups and five dynamically positioned drillships, fourthree of which are under construction with deliveries scheduled for the second and fourththird quarters of 20132014 and the second and fourth quartersfirst quarter of 2014.2015. Diamond Offshore’s semisubmersible fleet also includes theOcean OnyxandOcean Apex, twoa moored semisubmersible rigsrig which areis under construction and expected to be delivered in the third quarter of 2013 and2014, a mid-water floater which is being modified to work in the North Sea, to be completed in the second quarter of 2014.2014 and a dynamically positioned, ultra-deepwater harsh environment semisubmersible

drilling rig, under construction, expected to be delivered in the first quarter of 2016. Diamond Offshore’s diverse fleet enables it to offer a broad range of services worldwide in both the floater market (ultra-deepwater, deepwater and mid-water) and the non-floater, or jack-up market.

A floater rig is a type of mobile offshore drilling unit that floats and does not rest on the seafloor. This asset class includes self-propelled drillships and semisubmersible rigs. Semisubmersible rigs consist of an upper working and living deck resting on vertical columns connected to lower hull members. Such rigs operate in a “semi-submerged” position, remaining afloat, off bottom, in a position in which the lower hull is approximately 55 feet to 90 feet below the water line and the upper deck protrudes well above the surface. Semisubmersible rigs hold position while drilling by use of a series of small propulsion units or thrusters that provide dynamic positioning (“DP”) to keep the rig on location, or with anchors tethered to the seabed. Although DP semisubmersibles are self-propelled, such rigs may be moved long distances with the assistance of tug boats; non-DP,boats. Non-DP, or moored, semisubmersible rigs require tug boats or the use of a heavy lift vessel to move between locations.

A drillship is an adaptation of a maritime vessel which is designed and constructed to carry out drilling operations by means of a substructure with a moon pool centrally located in the hull. Drillships are typically self-propelled and are positioned over a drillsite through the use of either an anchoring system or a DP system similar to those used on semisubmersible rigs.

Diamond Offshore’s floater fleet (semisubmersibles and drillships) can be further categorized based on the nominal water depth for each class of rig as follows:

 

Category  Rated Water Depth (a) (in feet)  Number of Units in Fleet

 

Ultra-Deepwater

  7,501    to    12,000        1213  (b)

Deepwater

  5,000    to      7,500    7  (c)

Mid-Water

     400    to      4,999  18                  (d)

 

(a)

Rated water depth for semisubmersibles and drillships reflects the maximum water depth in which a floating rig has been designed to operate. However, individual rigs are capable of drilling, or have drilled, in marginally greater water depths depending on various conditions (such as salinity of the ocean, weather and sea conditions).

(b)

Includes fourthree drillships and one harsh environment semisubmersible rig under construction.

(c)

Includes two rigs to be constructedone rig under construction utilizing the hullshull of twoone of Diamond Offshore’s existing mid-water floaters.

(d)

Includes three rigs which are being marketed for sale.

Jack-up rigs are mobile, self-elevating drilling platforms equipped with legs that are lowered to the ocean floor. Diamond Offshore’s jack-ups are used for drilling in water depths from 20 feet to 350 feet. The water depth limit of a particular rig is able to operate is principally determined by the length of the rig’s legs. The rig hull includes the drilling equipment, jacking system, crew quarters, loading and unloading facilities, storage areas for bulk and liquid materials, heliport and other related equipment. A jack-up rig is towed to the drillsite with its hull riding in the sea, as a vessel, with its legs retracted. Once over a drillsite, the legs are lowered until they rest on the seabed and jacking continues with the legs penetrating the seabed until they are firm and stable, and resistance is sufficient to elevate the hull above the surface of the water. After completion of drilling operations, the hull is lowered until it rests in the

water and then the legs are retracted for relocation to another drillsite. All of Diamond Offshore’s jack-up rigs are equipped with a cantilever system that enables the rig to extend its drilling package over the aft end of the rig.

Fleet Enhancements and Additions:  Diamond Offshore’s long term strategy is to upgrade its fleet to meet customer demand for advanced, efficient and high-tech rigs by acquiring or building new rigs when possible to do so at attractive prices, and otherwise by enhancing the capabilities of its existing rigs at a lower cost and reduced construction period than newbuild construction would require. Since 2009, commencing with the acquisition of two newbuild, ultra-deepwater semisubmersible rigs, Diamond Offshore has contracted with Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd.committed over $5 billion towards upgrading its fleet. TheOcean Onyx, for the construction of four dynamically positioned, ultra-deepwater drillships. Diamond Offshore expects the aggregate cost for the four drillships, including commissioning, spares and project management costs, to be approximately $2.6 billion.

Construction has begun on two moored semisubmersible rigs designed to operate in water depths up to 6,000 feet. The rigs will be constructed utilizing the hulls of two of Diamond Offshore’s mid-water floaters and the aggregate cost of the two rigs is estimated to be approximately $680 million, including commissioning, spares and project management costs.

In February of 2013, Diamond Offshore announced that one of its mid-water floaters, theOcean Patriot, will undergo enhancements to enable the rig to worktwo newest deepwater semisubmersible rigs, was completed in late 2013 and commenced drilling operations under a one-year contract in the North Sea at an estimated aggregate costGulf of approximately $120 million.Mexico (“GOM”) in early 2014. The enhancement projectOcean BlackHawk, the first of four new ultra-deepwater drillships, is currently mobilizing to the GOM and is expected to begin duringworking under contract in the thirdsecond quarter of 2013 with completion expected in early 2014. Diamond Offshore also has six other construction/enhancement projects underway including:

three dynamically positioned, ultra-deepwater drillships with expected completion dates in the second and third quarters of 2014 and the first quarter of 2015 at an aggregate cost of approximately $1.9 billion;

a dynamically positioned, ultra-deepwater harsh environment semisubmersible drilling rig with an expected completion date in the first quarter of 2016 at an estimated cost of approximately $755 million;

a deepwater semisubmersible rig with an expected completion date in the third quarter of 2014 at an estimated cost of approximately $370 million; and

enhancements to a mid-water semisubmersible rig that will enable the rig to work in the North Sea with an expected completion date in the second quarter of 2014 at an estimated cost of approximately $120 million.

Diamond Offshore will evaluate further rig acquisition and upgradeenhancement opportunities as they arise. However, Diamond Offshore can provide no assurance whether, or to what extent, it will continue to make rig acquisitions or upgradesenhancements to its fleet.

Markets:  The principal markets for Diamond Offshore’s contract drilling services are the following:

 

  

South America, principally offshore Brazil;Brazil and Trinidad and Tobago;

 

  

Australia and Southeast Asia, including Malaysia, Indonesia Thailand and Vietnam;

 

  

the Middle East, including Kuwait, Qatar and Saudi Arabia;East;

 

  

Europe, principally in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) and Norway;

 

  

East and West Africa;

 

  

the Mediterranean Basin, including Egypt;Mediterranean; and

 

  

the Gulf of Mexico, including the U.S. and Mexico.

Diamond Offshore actively markets its rigs worldwide. From time to time Diamond Offshore’s fleet operates in various other markets throughout the world.

Diamond Offshore believes its presence in multiple markets is valuable in many respects. For example, Diamond Offshore believes that its experience with safety and other regulatory matters in the U.K. has been beneficial in Australia and other international areas in which Diamond Offshore operates, while production experience it has gained through its Brazilian and North Sea operations has potential application worldwide. Additionally, Diamond Offshore believes its performance for a customer in one market area enables it to better understand that customer’s needs and better serve that customer in different market areas or other geographic locations.

Drilling Contracts:  Diamond Offshore’s contracts to provide offshore drilling services vary in their terms and provisions. Diamond Offshore typically obtains its contracts through a competitive bid process, although it is not unusual for Diamond Offshore to be awarded drilling contracts following direct negotiations. Drilling contracts generally provide for a basic fixed dayrate regardless of whether or not such drilling results in a productive well. Drilling contracts may also provide for reductions in rates during periods when the rig is being moved or when

drilling operations are interrupted or restricted by equipment breakdowns, adverse weather conditions or other circumstances. Under dayrate contracts, Diamond Offshore generally pays the operating expenses of the rig, including wages and the cost of incidental supplies. Historically, dayrate contracts have accounted for the majority of Diamond Offshore’s revenues. In addition, from time to time, Diamond Offshore’s dayrate contracts may also provide for the ability to earn an incentive bonus from its customer based upon performance.

The duration of a dayrate drilling contract is generally tied to the time required to drill a single well or a group of wells, which Diamond Offshore refers to as a well-to-well contract, or a fixed period of time, in what Diamond Offshore refers to as a term contract. Many drilling contracts may be terminated by the customer in the event the drilling rig is destroyed or lost or if drilling operations are suspended for an extended period of time as a result of a breakdown of equipment or, in some cases, due to other events beyond the control of either party to the contract. Certain of Diamond Offshore’s contracts also permit the customer to terminate the contract early by giving notice, and in most circumstances, this requires the payment of an early termination fee by the customer. The contract term in many instances may also be extended by the customer exercising options for the drilling of additional wells or for an additional length of time, generally at competitive market rates and mutually agreeable terms at the time of the extension.

Customers:  Diamond Offshore provides offshore drilling services to a customer base that includes major and independent oil and gas companies and government-owned oil companies. During 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, Diamond Offshore performed services for 39, 35 52 and 4652 different customers. During 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, one of Diamond Offshore’s customers in Brazil, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (“Petrobras”), (a Brazilian multinational energy company that is majority-owned by the Brazilian government), accounted for 33%34%, 35%33% and 24%35% of Diamond Offshore’s annual total consolidated revenues. OGX Petróleo e Gás Ltda. (“OGX”), (a privately owned Brazilian oil and natural gas company)company that filed for bankruptcy in October of 2013), accounted for 12%2%, 14%12% and 14% of Diamond Offshore’s annual total consolidated revenues in each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of Diamond Offshore’s annual total consolidated revenues during 2013, 2012 2011 or 2010.2011.

Brazil is one of the most active floater markets in the world today. Currently, the greatest concentration of Diamond Offshore’s operating assets is offshore Brazil, where it has 12ten rigs contracted. Diamond Offshore’s contract backlog attributable to its expected operations offshore Brazil is $1.2 billion, $1.0 billion, $0.5 billion$953 million, $537 million and $62 million for the years 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016.

Competition:  Despite consolidation in recentprevious years, the offshore contract drilling industry remains highly competitive with numerous industry participants, none of which at the present time has a dominant market share. The industry may also experience additional consolidation in the future, which could create other large competitors. Some of Diamond Offshore’s competitors may have greater financial or other resources than Diamond Offshore. Diamond Offshore competes with offshore drilling contractors that together have almost 780approximately 600 mobile rigs available worldwide.

The offshore contract drilling industry is influenced by a number of factors, including global economies and demand for oil and natural gas, current and anticipated prices of oil and natural gas, expenditures by oil and gas companies for exploration and development of oil and natural gas and the availability of drilling rigs.

Drilling contracts are traditionally awarded on a competitive bid basis. Price is typically the primary factor in determining which qualified contractor is awarded a job. Customers may also consider rig availability and location, a drilling contractor’s operational and safety performance record, and condition and suitability of equipment. Diamond Offshore believes it competes favorably with respect to these factors.

Diamond Offshore competes on a worldwide basis, but competition may vary significantly by region at any particular time. Competition for offshore rigs generally takes place on a global basis, as these rigs are highly mobile and may be moved, at a cost that may be substantial, from one region to another. It is characteristic of the offshore contract drilling industry to move rigs from areas of low utilization and dayrates to areas of greater activity and relatively higher dayrates. Significant new rig construction and upgrades of existing drilling units could also intensify price competition.

Governmental Regulation:  Diamond Offshore’s operations are subject to numerous international, foreign, U.S., state and local laws and regulations that relate directly or indirectly to its operations, including regulations controlling the discharge of materials into the environment, requiring removal and clean-up under some circumstances, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, and may include laws or regulations pertaining to climate change, carbon emissions or energy use.

Operations Outside the United States:  Diamond Offshore’s operations outside the U.S. accounted for approximately 94%89%, 90%94% and 81%90% of its total consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

Properties:  Diamond Offshore owns an office building in Houston, Texas, where its corporate headquarters are located, offices and other facilities in New Iberia, Louisiana, Aberdeen, Scotland, Macae, Brazil and Ciudad del Carmen, Mexico. Additionally, Diamond Offshore currently leases various office, warehouse and storage facilities in Louisiana, Australia, Indonesia, Norway, Malaysia, Singapore, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Angola, Vietnam, Thailand, Cameroon, Trinidad and Tobago and the U.K. to support its offshore drilling operations.

BOARDWALK PIPELINE PARTNERS, LP

Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (“Boardwalk Pipeline”) is engaged in integrated natural gas and natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) transportation and storage and natural gas gathering and processing. Boardwalk Pipeline accounted for 8.1%8.2%, 8.1% and 7.7%8.1% of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

We own approximately 55%53% of Boardwalk Pipeline comprised of 102,719,466125,586,133 common units, 22,866,667 class B units and a 2% general partner interest. A wholly owned subsidiary of ours, Boardwalk Pipelines Holding Corp. (“BPHC”) is the general partner and holds all of Boardwalk Pipeline’s incentive distribution rights which entitle the general partner to an increasing percentage of the cash that is distributed by Boardwalk Pipeline in excess of $0.4025 per unit per quarter.

In October of 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline acquired Boardwalk Louisiana Midstream LLC (“Louisiana Midstream”) for approximately $620 million. Louisiana Midstream provides transportation and storage services for natural gas and NGLs, fractionation services for NGLs and brine supply services for producers and consumers of petrochemicals through two hubs in southern Louisiana.

Boardwalk Pipeline owns and operates approximately 14,17014,195 miles of interconnected natural gas pipelines directly serving customers in 13 states and indirectly serving customers throughout the northeastern and southeastern United States through numerous interconnections with unaffiliated pipelines. Boardwalk Pipeline also owns approximately 240255 miles of NGL pipelines in Louisiana. In 2012,2013, its pipeline systems transported approximately 2.52.4 trillion cubic feet (“Tcf”) of natural gas and approximately 7.17.5 million barrels (“MMbbls”) of NGLs. Average daily throughput on Boardwalk Pipeline’s natural gas pipeline systems during 20122013 was approximately 6.96.6 billion cubic feet (“Bcf”). Boardwalk Pipeline’s natural gas storage facilities are comprised of 14 underground storage fields located in four states with aggregate working gas capacity of approximately 201.0207.0 Bcf and Boardwalk Pipeline’s NGL storage facilities consist of eight salt dome storage caverns located in one stateLouisiana with an aggregate storage capacity of approximately 17.6 MMbbls. Boardwalk Pipeline also owns two salt dome caverns for use in providing brine supply services and to support the NGL cavernstorage operations.

The pipeline and storage systems of Boardwalk Pipeline consist of the following:

The Gulf Crossing pipeline system, which originates in Texas and proceeds into Louisiana, operates approximately 360 miles of natural gas pipeline. The pipeline system has a peak-day delivery capacity of 1.7 Bcf per day and average daily throughput for the year ended December 31, 20122013 was 1.31.2 Bcf per day.

The Gulf South pipeline system runs approximately 7,2407,200 miles along the Gulf Coast in the states of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida. Gulf South has two natural gas storage facilities with 83.0 Bcf of working gas storage capacity. The pipeline system has a peak-day delivery capacity of 6.86.9 Bcf per day and average daily throughput for the year ended December 31, 20122013 was 3.02.5 Bcf per day.

The Texas Gas pipeline system originates in Louisiana, East Texas and Arkansas and runs for approximately 6,1106,100 miles north and east through Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, and into Ohio, with smaller diameter lines extending into Illinois. The pipeline system has a peak-day delivery capacity of 4.44.6 Bcf per day and average daily throughput for the year ended December 31, 20122013 was 2.52.6 Bcf per day. Texas Gas owns nine natural gas storage fields with 84.0 Bcf of working gas storage capacity.

Field Services operates natural gas gathering, compression, treating and processing infrastructure primarily in southernsouth Texas and in the Marcellus Shale area in Pennsylvania with approximately 355420 miles of pipeline.

Petal Gas Storage, LLC (formerly referred to as Boardwalk HP Storage Company, LLCLLC) (“HP Storage”Petal”) owns and operates seveneight salt dome natural gas storage caverns in Mississippi, with 36.346.0 Bcf of total storage capacity, of which approximately 23.029.0 Bcf is working gas capacity. HP StoragePetal also operates approximately 105100 miles of pipeline which connects its facilities with several major natural gas pipelines, including Gulf South. Average daily throughput for the pipeline system for the year ended December 31, 20122013 was 0.10.2 Bcf per day. HP StoragePetal also owns undeveloped land which is suitable for up to sixfive additional storage caverns, one of which is expected to be placed in service in 2013.caverns.

Louisiana Midstream’s storage services provide approximately 53.257.8 MMbbls of salt dome storage capacity, including approximately 11.0 Bcf of working natural gas storage capacity and approximately 17.6 MMbbls of salt dome NGL storage capacity, significant brine supply infrastructure including two salt dome caverns and more than 240approximately 270 miles of pipeline assets, including an extensive ethylene distribution system.

Boardwalk Pipeline’s current expansiongrowth projects and investments include the following:

Southeast Market Expansion: The Southeast Market Expansion project is an interconnection between Boardwalk Pipeline’s Gulf South pipeline and HP StoragePetal facilities, additional compression facilities and approximately 70 miles of additional pipeline, adding 0.5 Bcf per day of peak-day transmission capacity, subject tocapacity. The project, which was approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) approval. The project, is expected to be placed in service in the second halffourth quarter of 2014 and will cost approximately $300 million. The Southeast Market Expansion project is fully contracted with a weighted-averageweighted average contract life of approximately 10 years.

South Texas Eagle Ford Expansion: The South Texas Eagle Ford Expansion construction project consists of 55 miles of gathering pipeline and a cryogenic processing plant. The system will have the capability of gathering in excess of 0.3 Bcf per day of liquids-rich gas in the Eagle Ford Shale production area in Texas and processing upOhio to 150 MMcf per day of liquids-rich gas.Louisiana Access Project: Boardwalk Pipeline will alsoPipeline’s Ohio to Louisiana Access Project would provide re-delivery of processed residue gas to a number of interstate and intrastate pipelines. Boardwalk Pipeline has executed long term fee-based gatheringfirm natural gas transportation from the Marcellus and processing agreements for approximately 50%Utica production areas to Louisiana. This project does not add additional capacity to Boardwalk Pipeline’s natural gas pipeline systems, but will reverse the traditional flow of the plant’s processing capacity.natural gas from northbound to southbound on a portion of its Texas Gas system. The plant and new pipeline are estimated to cost approximately $180 million and are expected to be placed in service in April of 2013.

Salt Dome Storage: HP Storage is developing a new salt dome storage cavern having working gas capacity of approximately 5.3 Bcf, which is expected to be placed in service in the second quarter of 2013 with an estimated cost of approximately $23 million.

Choctaw Brine Supply Expansion Projects: Louisiana Midstream is engaged in two brine supply service expansion projects. The first brine supply project consists of the development of a one million barrel brine pond, which was placed in service in January of 2013 at a total cost of approximately $13 million. Louisiana Midstream has executed seven-year, fixed-fee contracts in support of this project. The second project, which is supported by firm transportation contracts for 0.6 Bcf of capacity per day with producers and end-users with a 20-year commitment with minimum volume requirements, consistsweighted average contract life of constructing 26 miles of 12-inch pipeline from Louisiana Midstream’s facilities to a petrochemical customer’s plant. Thisapproximately 13 years. The project is expected to cost approximately $50$115 million and is expected to be placed ininto service in the third quarterfirst half of 2013.2016, subject to FERC approval.

Bluegrass Project: In 2013, Boardwalk Pipeline executed a series of agreements with the Williams Companies, Inc. (“Williams”) to develop the Bluegrass Project, a joint venture project that would develop a pipeline to transport NGLs from the Marcellus and Utica shale plays to the petrochemical and export complex in the Lake Charles, Louisiana area, and the construction of related fractionation, storage and liquefied petroleum gas (“LPG”) terminal export facilities.

The proposed project would include constructing a new pipeline that would initially provide producers with 200,000 barrels per day of mixed NGLs take-away capacity in Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania to an interconnect with the Texas Gas pipeline in Kentucky. Capacity could be increased to 400,000 barrels per day to meet market demand, primarily by adding additional liquids pumping capacity. From the interconnect with Texas Gas to Louisiana, a portion of the Texas Gas pipeline (“Texas Gas Loop Line”) would be converted from natural gas service to NGLs service. The proposed project would also include constructing a new large-scale fractionation plant, expanding NGLs storage facilities in Louisiana, constructing a new pipeline connecting these facilities to the converted Texas Gas Loop Line and constructing a new export LPG terminal and related facilities on the Gulf Coast to provide customers access to international markets.

Boardwalk Pipeline and Williams are engaged in comprehensive project development activities including project design, cost estimating, economic and risk analysis, permitting, other legal and regulatory approvals and right-of-way acquisition. Boardwalk Pipeline and Williams are also continuing ongoing discussions with potential customers regarding commitments for pipeline, fractionation, storage and export services to support this project. As of December 31, 2013, Boardwalk Pipeline and BPHC have contributed a total of $79 million to the project for pre-construction development costs.

Approval and completion of this project is subject to, among other conditions, execution of customer contracts sufficient to support the project, acquisition of right-of-way along the pipeline route, and the parties’ receipt of all necessary approvals, including board approvals and regulatory approvals, such as antitrust clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act and approvals by the FERC, among others. Before the Texas Gas Loop Line can be converted to NGLs service, abandonment authority must be received from FERC. The abandonment application was filed with FERC in May of 2013 and Boardwalk Pipeline estimates the abandonment process will take at least twelve months. In addition, each of the parties has the right, under certain circumstances, to withdraw from the project or from portions of the project, in which case the project may be terminated, only portions of the project may be completed, or the parties respective ownership interests in the project may change. Boardwalk Pipeline and Williams are continuing to evaluate all aspects of the project, including the anticipated date the project would be placed in service if it is completed.

Customers:   Boardwalk Pipeline serves a broad mix of customers, including producers of natural gas, local distribution companies, marketers, electric power generators, industrial users and interstate and intrastate pipelines, located throughout the Gulf Coast, Midwest and Northeast regions of the U.S.

Competition:   Boardwalk Pipeline competes with numerous other pipelines that provide transportation, storage and other services at many locations along its pipeline systems. Boardwalk Pipeline also competes with pipelines that are attached to new natural gas supply sources that are being developed closer to some of its traditional natural gas market areas. In addition, regulators’ continuing efforts to increase competition in the natural gas industry have increased the natural gas transportation options of Boardwalk Pipeline’s traditional customers. As a result of regulators’ policies, capacity segmentation and capacity release have created an active secondary market which increasingly competes with Boardwalk Pipeline’s natural gas pipeline services. Further, natural gas competes with other forms of energy available to Boardwalk Pipeline’s customers, including electricity, coal, fuel oils and alternative fuel sources.

The principal elements of competition among pipelines are available capacity, rates, terms of service, access to gas supplies, flexibility and reliability of service. In many cases, the elements of competition, in particular flexibility, terms of service and reliability, are key differentiating factors between competitors. This is especially the case with capacity being sold on a longer term basis. Boardwalk Pipeline is focused on finding opportunities to enhance its competitive profile in these areas by increasing the flexibility of its pipeline systems to meet the demands of customers, such as power generators and industrial users, and is continually reviewing its services and terms of service to offer customers enhanced service options.

Seasonality:   Boardwalk Pipeline’s revenues can be affected by weather, natural gas price levels, basis spreads and time period price spreads and natural gas price volatility. Weather impacts natural gas demand for heating needs and power generation, which in turn influences the short term value of transportation and storage across Boardwalk Pipeline’s pipeline systems. Colder than normal winters can result in an increase in the demand for natural gas for heating needs and warmer than normal summers can impact cooling needs, both of which typically result in increased pipeline transportation revenues and throughput. While traditionally peak demand for natural gas occurs during the winter months driven by heating needs, the increased use of natural gas for cooling needs during the summer months has partially reduced the seasonality of revenues. In 2012,2013, approximately 53% of Boardwalk Pipeline’s revenue was recognized in the first and fourth quarters of the year.

Governmental Regulation:   FERC regulates Boardwalk Pipeline’s natural gas operating subsidiaries under the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”) of 1938 and the Natural Gas Policy Act (“NGPA”) of 1978. FERC regulates, among other things, the rates and charges for the transportation and storage of natural gas in interstate commerce and the extension, enlargement or abandonment of facilities under its jurisdiction. Where required, Boardwalk Pipeline’s natural gas interstate subsidiaries hold certificates of public convenience and necessity issued by FERC covering certain of their facilities, activities and services. The maximum rates that may be charged by Boardwalk Pipeline’s subsidiaries operating under FERC’s jurisdiction, for all aspects of the natural gas transportation services it provides, are established through FERC’s cost-of-service rate-making process. The maximum rates that may be charged by Boardwalk Pipeline for storage services on Texas Gas, with the exception of services associated with a portion of the working gas capacity on that system, are established through FERC’s cost-of-service rate-making process. Key determinants in FERC’s cost-of-service rate-making process are the costs of providing service, the volumes of gas being transported, the rate design, the allocation of costs between services, the capital structure and the rate of return

a pipeline is permitted to earn. FERC has authorized Boardwalk Pipeline to charge market-based rates for its firm and interruptible storage services for the majority of its storage facilities. None of Boardwalk Pipeline’s FERC-regulated entities has an obligation to file a new rate case.

Boardwalk Pipeline is also regulated by the U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”) through the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”) under the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, as amended by Title I of the Pipeline Safety Act of 1979 (“NGPSA”) and the Hazardous Liquids Pipeline Safety Act of 1979 (“HLPSA”), which regulates safety requirements in the design, construction, operation and maintenance of interstate natural gas and NGL pipeline facilities. Boardwalk Pipeline has received authority from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”), an agency of DOT,PHMSA to operate certain natural gas pipeline assets under special permits that will allow it to operate those assets at higher than normal operating pressures of up to 0.80 of the pipe’s Specified Minimum Yield Strength (“SMYS”). Operating at higher than normal operating pressures will allow each of these pipelines to transport all of the volumes Boardwalk Pipeline has contracted for with its customers. PHMSA retains discretion whether to grant or maintain authority for Boardwalk Pipeline to operate these natural gas pipeline assets at higher pressures. PHMSA has also developed regulations that require transportation pipeline operators to implement integrity management programs to comprehensively evaluate certain high risk areas along their pipelines and take additional measures to protect pipeline

segments located in highly populated areas. The NGPSA and HLPSA were most recently amended by the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 (“2011 Act”) was enacted in 2012, andwith the 2011 Act requiring increased maximum civil penalties for certain violations to $200,000 per violation per day, and from aan increased total cap of $1 million to $2 million. In addition, the 2011 Act reauthorized the federal pipeline safety programs of PHMSA through September 30, 2015, and directs the Secretary of Transportation to undertake a number of reviews, studies and reports, some of which may result in more stringent safety controls or additional natural gas and hazardous liquids pipeline safety rulemaking. A number of the provisions of the 2011 Act have the potential to cause owners and operators of pipeline facilities to incur significant capital expenditures and/or operating costs.

Boardwalk Pipeline’s operations are also subject to extensive federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to protection of the environment. Such laws and regulations impose, among other things, restrictions, liabilities and obligations in connection with the generation, handling, use, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous substances and waste and in connection with spills, releases, discharges and emissions of various substances into the environment. Environmental regulations also require that Boardwalk Pipeline’s facilities, sites and other properties be operated, maintained, abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities.

Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of corrective or remedial obligations and the issuance of orders enjoining performance of some or all of Boardwalk Pipeline’s operations. While Boardwalk Pipeline believes that they are in substantial compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations and that continued compliance with existing requirements will not materially affect them, there is no assurance that the current regulatory standards will not become more onerous in the future, resulting in more significant costs to maintain compliance or increased exposure to significant liabilities.

Properties:   Boardwalk Pipeline is headquartered in approximately 108,000 square feet of leased office space located in Houston, Texas. Boardwalk Pipeline also leases approximately 108,00060,000 square feet of office space in Owensboro, Kentucky. Boardwalk Pipeline’s operating subsidiaries own their respective pipeline systems in fee. However, substantial portions of these systems are constructed and maintained on property owned by others pursuant to rights-of-way, easements, permits, licenses or consents.

HIGHMOUNT EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION LLC

HighMount Exploration & Production, LLC (“HighMount”) is engaged in the exploration, production and marketing of natural gas and oil (including condensate and NGLs). HighMount accounted for 2.0%1.7%, 2.5%2.0% and 2.9%2.5% of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

HighMount’s proved reserves and production are primarily located in the Sonora field, a tight sands gas formation within the Permian Basin in West Texas. HighMount holds mineral rights on over 500,000 net acres in the Permian Basin, with overapproximately 6,000 producing wells. In addition, HighMount has working interests in undeveloped oil and gas properties located on approximately 73,00067,000 net acres in Oklahoma and approximately 9,000 net acres in the Texas Panhandle which contain primarily oil reserves. During 2012, HighMount began the commercial development of its Oklahoma properties, utilizing horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing technologies.

HighMount’s interests in developed and undeveloped acreage, wellbores and well facilities generally take the form of working interests in leases that have varying terms. HighMount’s interests in these properties are, in many cases, held jointly with third parties and may be subject to royalty, overriding royalty, carried, net profits and other similar interests and contractual arrangements with other parties as is customary in the oil and gas industry. HighMount also owns and operates approximately 3,0003,200 miles of gathering lines and operates over 65,00058,000 horsepower of compression which are used to transport natural gas and NGLs principally from HighMount’s producing wells to processing plants and pipelines owned by third parties.

We use the following terms throughout this discussion of HighMount’s business, with “equivalent” volumes computed with oil and NGL quantities converted to Mcf, on an energy equivalent ratio of one barrel to six Mcf:

 

Average price  

-

  

Average price during the twelve-month period, prior to the date of the estimate, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements with customers, excluding escalations based upon future conditions

Bbl  

-

  

Barrel (of oil or NGLs)

Bcf  

-

  

Billion cubic feet (of natural gas)

Bcfe  

-

  

Billion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent

Developed acreage  

-

  

Acreage assignable to productive wells

Gross acres  

-

  

Total acres in which HighMount owns a working interest

Gross wells  

-

  

Total number of wells in which HighMount owns a working interest

Mcf  

-

  

Thousand cubic feet (of natural gas)

Mcfe  

-

  

Thousand cubic feet of natural gas equivalent

MMBbl  

-

  

Million barrels (of oil or NGLs)

MMBtu  

-

  

Million British thermal units

MMcf  

-

  

Million cubic feet (of natural gas)

MMcfe  

-

  

Million cubic feet of natural gas equivalent

Net acres  

-

  

The sum of all gross acres covered by a lease or other arrangement multiplied by the working interest owned by HighMount in such gross acreage

Net wells  

-

  

The sum of all gross wells multiplied by the working interest owned by HighMount in such wells

NGL  

-

  

Natural Gas Liquids – largely ethane and propane as well as some heavier hydrocarbons

Productive wells  

-

  

Producing wells and wells mechanically capable of production

Proved reserves  

-

  

Quantities of natural gas, NGLs and oil which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in the future from known reservoirs under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations

Proved developed reserves  

-

  

Proved reserves which can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment, infrastructure and operating methods

Proved undeveloped reserves  

-

  

Proved reserves which are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required

Tcf  

-

  

Trillion cubic feet (of natural gas)

Tcfe  

-

  

Trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent

Undeveloped acreage  

-

  

Acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of economic quantities of oil or gas

As of December 31, 2012,2013, HighMount owned 825.1719.3 Bcfe of net proved reserves, of which 84.1%92.7% were classified as proved developed reserves. HighMount’s estimated total proved reserves consist of 557.6514.5 Bcf of natural gas, 35.130.7 MMBbls of NGLs, and 9.53.4 MMBbls of oil and condensate. HighMount produced approximately 154133 MMcfe per day of net natural gas, NGLs and oil during 2012.2013. HighMount holds leasehold or drilling rights in 0.7 million net acres, of which 0.5 million is developed acreage and the balance is held for future exploration and development drilling opportunities. HighMount participated in the drilling of 9160 wells during 2012,2013, of which 8357 (or 91.2%95.0%) are productive wells.

Recent Developments:   The growth in recent years in the production of natural gas and natural gas liquids from new supply areas across the United States, some of which are closer to traditional high value end markets and are less expensive to produce than HighMount’s production, continues to depress the prices of those commodities. This trend is expected to continue for the foreseeable future as production from basins such as the Marcellus Shale and Utica Shale is forecasted to increase significantly over the next several years. As a result of these prevailing low commodity prices, it is not currently economical for HighMount to drill new natural gas wells in the Sonora field. In 2012, HighMount ceased drilling new gas wells and is now solely pursuing a strategy of seeking to develop resource plays expected to be rich in oil, which has not experienced the dramatic price declines of natural gas and natural gas liquids.

In 2011, HighMount acquired acreage in Oklahoma with non-proven oil resources in the Mississippian Lime and Woodford Shale formations. More recently, HighMount has been seeking to develop oil reserves in the Wolfcamp zone of its Sonora acreage. HighMount has drilled a number of exploratory wells in these plays using various horizontal drilling, fracturing and well completion techniques, which are far more expensive to drill than its traditional vertical natural gas wells in the Sonora field. HighMount is not currently drilling new wells on its Oklahoma properties and has one drilling rig working in the Wolfcamp area. To date, these exploratory wells have not yielded sufficient quantities of oil to support commercial development of these properties. Further study and refinement of drilling techniques will be required in order to determine whether there is an economic development opportunity.

In light of these developments, HighMount recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $584 million ($382 million after tax) in 2013. See the Results of Operations by Business Segment section of this MD&A and Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 for additional information.

Reserves:   HighMount’s reserves represent its share of reserves based on its net revenue interest in each property. Estimated reserves as of December 31, 20122013 are based upon studies for each of HighMount’s properties prepared by HighMount staff engineers and are the responsibility of management. Calculations were prepared using standard geological and engineering methods generally accepted by the petroleum industry and in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) guidelines.

HighMount employs various internal controls to validate the reserve estimation process. The main internal controls include (i) detailed reviews of reserve-related information by reserve engineering and executive management, (ii) reserve audits performed by an independent third party reserve auditor, (iii) segregation of duties, and (iv) system reconciliation or automated interface between various systems used in the reserve estimation process.

HighMount employs a team of reservoir engineers that specialize in HighMount’s areas of operation. The reservoir engineering team reports to HighMount’s Chief Operating Officer. The compensation of HighMount’s reservoir engineers is not dependent on the quantity of reserves booked. HighMount also employs a lead evaluator who reports to the Chief Financial Officer. HighMount’s lead evaluator has over 33seven years of petroleum engineering experience, most of which have been in the reservoir engineering and reserve fields. He is a member in good standing of and has held leadership roles in the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers and the Society of Petroleum Engineers, as well as a Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Texas.Engineers.

HighMount’s reserves estimates for 20122013 have been independently audited by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (“NSAI”), a worldwide leader of petroleum property analysis for industry and financial organizations and governmental agencies. NSAI was founded in 1961 and performs consulting services under Texas Board of Professional Engineers Registration No. F-2699. The technical person primarily responsible for NSAI’s audit and audit letter has 32over 30 years of industry experience and has been practicing consulting petroleum engineering at NSAI since 1989.

The following table sets forth HighMount’s proved reserves at December 31, 2012,2013, based on average 20122013 prices of $2.76$3.67 per MMBtu for natural gas, $41.11$35.39 per Bbl for NGLs and $94.71$96.94 per Bbl for oil. Approximately 95%99% of HighMount’s proved reserves wereare located in the Permian Basin in Texas and approximately 5%1% of proved reserves wereare located in Oklahoma.

 

            Natural Gas  
    Natural Gas         NGLs                  Oil               Equivalents  
      Natural Gas    
(MMcf)
   

    NGLs    

(Bbls)

   

Oil  

(Bbls)  

    Natural Gas 
Equivalents
(MMcfe)
   (MMcf)  (Bbls)  (Bbls)    (MMcfe)  

   

 

 

   

 

 

Proved developed

   490,978            28,835,347       4,945,283         693,662       484,922  27,571,435  2,761,873    666,922     

Proved undeveloped

   66,577            6,263,323       4,546,590         131,436         29,574    3,143,804     654,870    52,366     

   

 

 

   

 

 

Total proved

   557,555                35,098,670           9,491,873         825,098       514,496  30,715,239  3,416,743    719,288     

   

 

 

   

 

 

HighMount reviews its proved reserves on an annual basis. During 2012, total proved reserves declined 309 Bcfe, reflecting (i) a 328 Bcfe reduction as a result of economic factors such as lower gas prices and higher operating expenses, and as a result of higher production decline rates of its producing wells, partly due to the suspension of uneconomic maintenance and recompletion work, (ii) a 56 Bcfe reduction as a result of production during the year, offset by (iii) additionsfourth quarter of 75each year. During 2013, HighMount produced 48 Bcfe through drilling and booking of proved undeveloped locations.

At December 31, 2012, HighMount had proved undeveloped reserves of 131 Bcfe on locations scheduled to be drilled in the next five years. During 2012, HighMount recorded negative net reserve revisions of 19879 Bcfe primarily due to a reclassification of proved undeveloped reserves to the non-proved category because these reserves were no longer economical due to variability in well performance primarily in the decreaseMississippian Lime and reduction in drilling plans, driven by continued low natural gas and NGL prices. Also, 48 Bcfe of non-proved reserves were promoted to the proved undeveloped category as a result of the 2012 drilling activity. During 2012, HighMount spent $14 million to convert 2 Bcfe from proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves through drilling. As of December 31, 2012, there were no proved undeveloped locations that had remained undeveloped for five years or more.

Estimated net quantities of proved natural gas and oil reserves at December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 and changes in the reserves during 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 are shown in Note 1415 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

HighMount’s Sonora natural gas-producing properties typically have relatively long reserve lives and high well completion success rates. Based on December 31, 20122013 proved reserves and HighMount’s average production from these properties during 2012,2013, the average reserve-to-production index of HighMount’s proved reserves is 15 years.

In order to replenish reserves as they are depleted by production, and to increase reserves, and if determined to be economical, HighMount develops its existing acreage by drilling new wells and, where available, employing new technologies and drilling strategies designed to enhance production from existing wells. In addition, HighMount seeksmay seek to acquire additional acreage in its core areas of operation, as well as other locations where its management has identified an opportunity. As noted above, HighMount is not currently drilling new natural gas wells and is pursuing a limited drilling program seeking to develop additional oil reserves.

During 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, HighMount engaged in the drilling activity presented in the following table:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012        2011        2010            2013     2012     2011     

 
  Gross           Net          Gross           Net         Gross           Net          Gross     Net        Gross     Net        Gross     Net        

 

Development Wells

                                                  

Productive Wells

   83        78.5       46       46.0       227        221.3         57         45.3        83         78.5        46         46.0      

Dry Wells

   8        8.0             5.0       11        11.0                 3.0                8.0                5.0      

 

Total Development Wells

   91        86.5       51       51.0       238        232.3         60         48.3        91         86.5        51         51.0      

 

Exploratory Wells

                                                  

Productive Wells

          10       9.5                                    10         9.5      

Dry Wells

                2.0       2        2.0                                     2.0      

 

Total Exploratory Wells

          12       11.5       2        2.0                             12         11.5      

 

Total Completed Wells

   91        86.5       63       62.5       240        234.3         60         48.3        91         86.5        63         62.5      

 

In addition, at December 31, 2012,2013, HighMount had 23 (20.214 (13.8 net) wells in progress.

As of December 31, 2013, HighMount had working interests in approximately 6,000 gross producing wells (approximately 5,700 net producing wells) located primarily in the Permian Basin. In addition, HighMount had royalty interests in approximately 249 wells located in the Permian Basin. Wells located in the Permian Basin have a typical well depth in the range of 6,000 to 9,000 feet.

Acreage:  As of December 31, 2012,2013, HighMount owned interests in 1,107,5511,055,799 gross (700,281(657,354 net) acres in the United States which is comprised of 609,659615,282 gross (467,602(474,947 net) developed acres, and 497,892440,517 gross (232,679(182,407 net) undeveloped acres.

As of December 31, 2012, leasesLeases covering 86,577, 27,85918,956, 45,804 and 9,8438,150 of HighMount’s net acreage will expire byduring the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015,2016, if production is not established or HighMount takes no other action to extend the terms.

Production and Sales:  Please see the Production and Sales statistics table for additional information included in the MD&A under Item 7.

HighMount utilizes its own marketing and sales personnel to market the natural gas and oil that it produces to large energy companies and intrastate pipelines and gathering companies. Production is typically sold and delivered directly to a pipeline at liquid pooling points or at the tailgates of various processing plants, where it then enters a pipeline system. Permian Basin natural gas sales prices are primarily at a Houston Ship Channel Index.

To manage the risk of fluctuations in prevailing commodity prices, HighMount enters into commodity and basis swaps and other derivative instruments.

Wells:  As of December 31, 2012, HighMount had working interests in 6,133 gross producing wells (5,874 net producing wells) located primarily in the Permian Basin. In addition, HighMount had royalty interests in approximately 250 wells located in the Permian Basin. Wells located in the Permian Basin have a typical well depth in the range of 6,000 to 9,000 feet.

Competition:  HighMount competes with other oil and gas companies in all aspects of its business, including acquisition of producing properties and leases and obtaining goods, services and labor, including drilling rigs and well completion services. HighMount also competes in the marketing of produced natural gas and oil. Some of HighMount’s competitors have substantially larger financial and other resources than HighMount. Factors that affect HighMount’s ability to acquire producing properties include available funds, available information about the property and standards established by HighMount for minimum projected return on investment. Natural gas and oil also compete with alternative fuel sources, including heating oil and coal.

Governmental Regulation:  All of HighMount’s operations are conducted onshore in the United States. The U.S. oil and gas industry, and HighMount’s operations, are subject to regulation at the federal, state and local level. Such regulation includes requirements with respect to, among other things: permits to drill and to conduct other operations; provision of financial assurances (such as bonds) covering drilling and well operations; the location of wells; the method of drilling and completing wells; the surface use and restoration of properties upon which wells are drilled; the plugging and abandoning of wells; the marketing, transportation and reporting of production; the valuation and payment of royalties; the size of drilling and spacing units (regarding the density of wells which may be drilled in a particular area); the unitization or pooling of natural gas and oil properties; maximum rates of production from natural gas and oil wells; venting or flaring of natural gas; and the ratability of production and the operation of gathering systems and related assets.

HighMount uses hydraulic fracturing to stimulate the production of oil and natural gas. In recent years, concerns have been raised that the fracturing process may, among other things, contaminate underground sources of drinking water. The conference committee report for The Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2010 requested the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to conduct a study of hydraulic fracturing, particularly the relationship between hydraulic fracturing and drinking water. In December of 2012 the EPA issued a progress report of the projects the EPA is conducting as part of the study. A final draft report is expected to be released for public comment and peer review in 2014. Several bills have been introduced in Congress seeking federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing, which has historically been regulated at the state level, though none of the proposed legislation has been passed into law. HighMount believes that similar bills will continue to be introduced in Congress and a number of federal agencies are analyzing, or have been requested to review, a variety of environmental issues associated with hydraulic fracturing; however, HighMount cannot predict whether any such bill will be passed into law or, if passed, the substance of any such new law.

The Federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 amended the NGA to prohibit natural gas market manipulation by any entity, directed the FERC to facilitate market transparency in the sale or transportation of physical natural gas and significantly increased the penalties for violations of the NGA of 1938, the NGPA of 1978, or FERC regulations or orders thereunder. In addition, HighMount owns and operates gas gathering lines and related facilities which are regulated by the DOT and state agencies with respect to safety and operating conditions.

HighMount’s operations are also subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the discharge of contaminants into the environment, the generation, storage, transportation and disposal of contaminants, and the protection of public health, natural resources, wildlife and the environment. In most instances, the regulatory requirements relate to the handling and disposal of drilling and production waste products, water and air pollution control procedures, and the remediation of petroleum-product contamination. In addition, HighMount’s operations may require it to obtain permits for, among other things, air emissions, discharges into surface waters, and the construction and operation of underground injection wells or surface pits to dispose of produced saltwater and other non-hazardous oilfield wastes. HighMount could be required, without regard to fault or the legality of the original disposal, to remove or remediate previously disposed wastes, to suspend or cease operations in contaminated areas or to perform remedial well plugging operations or cleanups to prevent future contamination.

In September of 2009, the EPA adopted regulations under the Clean Air Act requiring the monitoring and reporting of annual greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions by certain large U.S. GHG emitters. Affected companies are required to monitor their GHG emissions and report to the EPA. Oil and gas exploration and production companies that emit more than 25,000 metric tons of GHG per year from any facility (as defined in the regulations), including HighMount, are required to monitor and report emissions for facilities that meet the emissions threshold. HighMount filed its first GHG report in SeptemberMarch of 20122013 for the 20112012 reporting year.

Properties:  In addition to its interests in oil and gas producing properties, HighMount leases an aggregate of approximately 56,300 square feet of office space in Houston, Texas, which includes its corporate headquarters, and approximately 83,800 square feet of office space in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. HighMount also leases other surface rights and office, warehouse and storage facilities necessary to operate its business. In addition to leased properties, HighMount also owns a 44,000 square foot office building in Sonora, Texas, and a 1,500 square foot office building in Morrison, Oklahoma.

LOEWS HOTELS HOLDING CORPORATION

The subsidiaries of Loews Hotels Holding Corporation (“Loews Hotels”), our wholly owned subsidiary, presently operate a chain of 1918 primarily upper, upscale hotels. Each hotel in the chain is managed by Loews Hotels. TenSeven of these hotels are owned by Loews Hotels, fiveseven are owned by joint ventures in which Loews Hotels has a significant equity interest and four are managed for unaffiliated owners. Loews Hotels’ earnings are derived from the operation of its wholly owned hotels, its share of earnings in joint venture hotels and hotel management fees earned from both joint venture and managed hotels. Loews Hotels accounted for 2.7%2.5%, 2.4%2.7% and 2.1%2.4% of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. The hotels are described below.

 

Name and Location  

Number of 


Rooms

 

Land Lease Information    

(if applicable)    

 

Owned:Owned (a):

  

Loews Annapolis Hotel, Annapolis, Maryland

   220  

Loews Boston Back Bay Hotel, Boston, Massachusetts

   225

Loews Coronado Bay, San Diego, California (b)

   440  

Land lease expiring 2034

Loews Le Concorde Hotel, Quebec City, Canada

   405

Land lease expiring 2069

Loews Madison Hotel, Washington, D.C.

   356

Loews Miami Beach Hotel, Miami Beach, Florida

   790  

Loews Philadelphia Hotel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

   585  

Loews Regency Hotel, New York, New York (c)

   350379         

Land lease expiring 2036 with renewal option for 24 years

Loews Vanderbilt Hotel, Nashville, Tennessee

   340  

Loews Hotel Vogue, Montreal, Canada

   140  

Joint Venture/Managed:

  

The Don CeSar, a Loews Hotel, St. Pete Beach, Florida

   347  

Hard Rock Hotel, at Universal Orlando, Orlando, Florida

   650

Loews Boston Hotel, Boston, Massachusetts

  225       

Loews Hollywood Hotel, Hollywood, California

   632

Loews Madison Hotel, Washington, D.C.

  356       

Loews Portofino Bay Hotel, at Universal Orlando, Orlando, Florida

   750  

Loews Royal Pacific Resort, at Universal Orlando, Orlando, Florida

  1,000  

Management Contract:

  

Loews Atlanta Hotel, Atlanta, Georgia

   414  

Loews New Orleans Hotel, New Orleans, Louisiana

   285  

Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel, Santa Monica, California

   340  

Loews Ventana Canyon, Tucson, Arizona

   400  

(a)

In February of 2014, the Loews LeConcorde Hotel in Quebec City, Canada was closed.

(b)

The hotel has a land lease expiring in 2034.

(c)

The hotel has a land lease expiring in 2036 with a renewal option for 24 years.

Under Construction:In 2013, Loews Hotels is a 50% partner in a joint venture which is constructing Cabana Bay Beach Resort, an 1,800 guestroom hotel at Universal Orlando, Florida. The first phase is expected to open early in 2014. Construction continues on the Loews Chicago Hotel, a 400 guestroom hotel which Loews Hotels agreed to purchase, upon completion of development expected to occur early in 2015.

Competition:Competition from other hotels and lodging facilities is vigorous in all areas in which Loews Hotels operates. The demand for hotel rooms in many areas is seasonal and dependent on general and local economic conditions. Loews Hotels properties also compete with facilities offering similar services in locations other than those in which its hotels are located. Competition among luxury hotels is based primarily on location and service. Competition among resort and commercial hotels is based on price as well as location and service. Because of the competitive nature of the industry, hotels must continually make expenditures for updating, refurnishing and repairs and maintenance, in order to prevent competitive obsolescence.

Recent Developments:

In June of 2012, Loews Hotels acquired a hotel in Hollywood, California, which is now operating as the Loews Hollywood Hotel. In November of 2012, Loews Hotels formed a joint venture with an institutional investor, which acquired an equity interest in the Loews Hollywood Hotel.

In December of 2012, Loews Hotels sold the Loews Denver Hotel.

In January of 2013, Loews Hotels acquired a hotel in Washington, D.C., which is now operating as the Loews Madison Hotel.

In February of 2013, Loews Hotels acquired a hotel in Boston, Massachusetts, which is now operating as the Loews Boston Back Bay Hotel.

In 2012, Loews Hotels became a 50% partner in a joint venture which is constructing an 1,800 guestroom hotel at Universal Orlando, Florida.

In December of 2012, Loews Hotels agreed to purchase, upon completion of development expected to occur in 2015, a 400 guestroom hotel in Chicago, Illinois.

EMPLOYEE RELATIONS

Including our operating subsidiaries as described below, we employed approximately 18,30018,175 persons at December 31, 2012.2013. We, and our subsidiaries, have experienced satisfactory labor relations.

CNA employed approximately 7,5007,035 persons.

Diamond Offshore employed approximately 5,3005,500 persons, including international crew personnel furnished through independent labor contractors.

Boardwalk Pipeline employed approximately 1,200 persons, approximately 110 of whom are union members covered under collective bargaining units.

HighMount employed approximately 400 persons.

Loews Hotels employed approximately 3,6253,780 persons, approximately 9651,100 of whom are union members covered under collective bargaining units.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

 

Name  Position and Offices Held  Age  First
  Became  
Officer

 

David B. Edelson

  

Senior Vice President

  53  2005

Gary W. Garson

  

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

  66  1988

Peter W. Keegan

  

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  68  1997

Richard W. Scott

  

Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer

  59  2009

Kenneth I. Siegel

  

Senior Vice President

  55  2009

Andrew H. Tisch

  

Office of the President, Co-Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee

  63  1985

James S. Tisch

  

Office of the President, President and Chief Executive Officer

  60  1981

Jonathan M. Tisch

  

Office of the President and Co-Chairman of the Board

  59  1987

           First  
           Became  
                 Name  Position and Offices Held  Age    Officer  

 

David B. Edelson

  

Senior Vice President

  54    2005  

Gary W. Garson

  

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

  67    1988  

Peter W. Keegan

  

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  69    1997  

Richard W. Scott

  

Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer

  60    2009  

Kenneth I. Siegel

  

Senior Vice President

  56    2009  

Andrew H. Tisch

  

Office of the President, Co-Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee

  64    1985  

James S. Tisch

  

Office of the President, President and Chief Executive Officer

  61    1981  

Jonathan M. Tisch

  

Office of the President and Co-Chairman of the Board

  60    1987  

Andrew H. Tisch and James S. Tisch are brothers and are cousins of Jonathan M. Tisch. None of the other officers or directors of Registrant is related to any other.

All of our executive officers except for Kenneth I. Siegel and Richard W. Scott have been engaged actively and continuously in our business for more than the past five years. Prior to joining us in 2009, Mr. Siegel was employed as a Managing Director in the Mergers & Acquisitions Department at Barclays Capital Inc. and previously in a similar capacity at Lehman Brothers. Prior to joining us in 2009, Mr. Scott was employed at American International Group, Inc. for more than five years, serving in various senior investment positions, including Chief Investment Officer–Insurance Portfolio Management.

Officers are elected and hold office until their successors are elected and qualified, and are subject to removal by the Board of Directors.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

Our website address is www.loews.com. We make available, free of charge, through the website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Copies of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Audit Committee charter, Compensation Committee charter and Nominating and Governance Committee charter have also been posted and are available on our website.

Item 1A.  RISK FACTORS.

Our business faces many risks. We have described below some of the more significant risks which we and our subsidiaries face. There may be additional risks that we do not yet know of or that we do not currently perceive to be significant that may also impact our business or the business of our subsidiaries.

Each of the risks and uncertainties described below could lead to events or circumstances that have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition or equity and/or the business, results of operations, financial condition or equity of one or more of our subsidiaries.

You should carefully consider and evaluate all of the information included in this Report and any subsequent reports we may file with the SEC or make available to the public before investing in any securities issued by us. Our subsidiaries, CNA Financial Corporation, Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, are public companies and file reports with the SEC. You are also cautioned to carefully review and consider the information contained in the reports filed by those subsidiaries before investing in any of their securities.

Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiary, CNA Financial Corporation

If CNA determines that its recorded insurance reserves are insufficient to cover its estimated ultimate unpaid liability for claim and claim adjustment expenses, CNA may need to increase its insurance reserves.reserves which would result in a charge to CNA’s earnings.

CNA maintains insurance reserves to cover its estimated ultimate unpaid liability for claim and claim adjustment expenses, including the estimated cost of the claims adjudication process, for reported and unreported claims and for future policy benefits. Reserves represent CNA’s best estimate at a given point in time. Insurance reserves are not an exact calculation of liability but instead are complex estimates derived by CNA, generally utilizing a variety of reserve estimation techniques from numerous assumptions and expectations about future events, many of which are highly uncertain, such as estimates of claims severity, frequency of claims, mortality, morbidity, discount rates, inflation, claims handling, case reserving policies and procedures, underwriting and pricing policies, changes in the legal and regulatory environment and the lag time between the occurrence of an insured event and the time of its ultimate settlement. Mortality is the relative incidence of death. Morbidity is the frequency and severity of illness, sickness and diseases contracted. Many of these uncertainties are not precisely quantifiable and require significant judgment on CNA’s part. As trends in underlying claims develop, particularly in so-called “long tail”“long-tail” or long duration coverages, CNA is sometimes required to add to its reserves. This is called unfavorable net prior year

development and results in a charge to earnings in the amount of the added reserves, recorded in the period the change in estimate is made. These charges can be substantial.

CNA is also subject to the uncertain effects of emerging or potential claims and coverage issues that arise as industry practices and legal, judicial, social, economic and other environmental conditions change. These issues have had, and may continue to have, a negative effect on CNA’s business by either extending coverage beyond the original underwriting intent or by increasing the number or size of claims, resulting in further increases in CNA’s reserves. The effects of these and other unforeseen emerging claim and coverage issues are extremely harddifficult to predict. Examples of emerging or potential claims and coverage issues include:

 

  

uncertainty in future medical costs in workers’ compensation. In particular, medical cost inflation could be greater than expected due to new treatments, drugs and devices; increased health care utilization; and/or the effectsfuture costs of worldwide economic conditions, which have resulted in an increase inhealth care facilities. In addition, the numberrelationship between workers’ compensation and size of certain claims including both directors

government and officers (“D&O”) and errors and omissions (“E&O”) insurance claims relatedprivate health care providers could change, potentially shifting costs to corporate failures, as well as other coverages;workers’ compensation;

 

  

increased uncertainty related to medical professional liability, medical products liability and workers’ compensation coverages resulting from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act;

significant class action litigation relating to claims handling and other practices;litigation; and

 

  

mass tort claims, including bodily injury claims related to welding rods, benzene, lead, noise induced hearing loss, injuries from various medical products including pharmaceuticals and various other chemical and radiation exposure claims.

In light of the many uncertainties associated with establishing the estimates and making the assumptions necessary to establish reserve levels, CNA reviews and changes its reserve estimates in a regular and ongoing process as experience develops and further claims are reported and settled. If estimated reserves are insufficient for any reason, the required increase in reserves would be recorded as a charge against earnings in the period in which reserves are determined to be insufficient. These charges could be substantial.

CNA’s key assumptions used to determine reserves for long term care products and payout annuity contracts could vary significantly from actual experience.

CNA’s reserves for long term care products and payout annuity contracts are based on certain key assumptions including morbidity, mortality, policy persistency (the percentage of policies remaining in force) and discount rates (whichrate. These assumptions are impacted by expected investment yields). critical bases for reserve estimates and, while monitored consistently, are inherently uncertain due to the limited historical data and industry data available to CNA, as only a small portion of the long term care policies which have been written to date are in claims paying status, and the potential changing trends in morbidity and mortality over time. Assumptions relating to mortality and discount rate also form the basis for reserve determination for payout annuity products.

A prolonged period during which interest rates remain at levels lower than those anticipated in CNA’s reserving maywould result in shortfalls in investment income on assets supporting policyCNA’s obligations under long term care policies and payout annuity contracts, which may also require changes to its reserves. These assumptions, while based on historical data and industry experience and monitored consistently, are critical basesThis risk is more significant for reserve estimates and are inherently uncertain.long term care products because the long potential duration of the policy obligations exceeds the duration of the supporting investment assets. If estimated reserves are insufficient for any reason, including changes in assumptions, the required increase in reserves would be recorded as a charge against earnings in the period in which reserves are determined to be insufficient. These charges could be substantial.

Catastrophe losses are unpredictable and could result in material losses.

Catastrophe losses are an inevitable part of CNA’s business. Various events can cause catastrophe losses. These events can be natural or man-made, and may include hurricanes, windstorms, earthquakes, hail, severe winter weather, fires, floods, riots, strikes, civil commotion and acts of terrorism. The frequency and severity of these catastrophe events are inherently unpredictable. In addition, longer-term natural catastrophe trends may be changing and new types of catastrophe losses may be developing due to climate change, a phenomenon that has been associated with extreme weather events linked to rising temperatures, and includes effects on global weather patterns, greenhouse gases, sea, land and air temperatures, sea levels, rain, hail and snow.

The extent of CNA’s losses from catastrophes is a function of the total amount of its insured exposures in the affected areas, the frequency and severity of the events themselves, the level of reinsurance assumed and ceded and reinsurance reinstatement premiums, if any. As in the case of catastrophe losses generally, it can take a long time for the ultimate cost to CNA to be finally determined, as a multitude of factors contribute to such costs, including evaluation of general liability and pollution exposures, additional living expenses, infrastructure disruption, business interruption and reinsurance collectibility. Reinsurance coverage for terrorism events is provided only in limited

circumstances, especially in regard to “unconventional” terrorism acts, such as nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological attacks. As a result, catastrophe losses are particularly difficult to estimate. Additionally, the U.S. government currently provides financial protection through the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization

As

Act, which is set to expire December 31, 2014. Should that act expire without reauthorization or be reauthorized under materially different terms, CNA’s claim experience develops onnet exposure to a specific catastrophe, CNA may be required to adjust its reserves, or take unfavorable net prior year development, to reflect revised estimates of the total cost of claims.significant terrorist event could increase.

CNA has exposure related to A&EP claims, which could result in material losses.

CNA’s property and casualty insurance subsidiaries have exposures related to A&EP claims. CNA’s experience has been that establishing claim and claim adjustment expense reserves for casualty coverages relating to A&EP claims is subject to uncertainties that are greater than those presented by other claims. Additionally, traditional actuarial methods and techniques employed to estimate the ultimate cost of claims for more traditional property and casualty exposures are less precise in estimating claim and claim adjustment expense reserves for A&EP. As a result, estimating the ultimate cost of both reported and unreported A&EP claims is subject to a higher degree of variability.

On August 31, 2010, CNA completed a retroactive reinsurance transaction under which substantially all of its legacy A&EP liabilities were ceded to National Indemnity Company (“NICO”), a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., subject to an aggregate limit of $4.0 billion (“Loss Portfolio Transfer”). If the other parties to the Loss Portfolio Transfer do not fully perform their obligations, CNA’s liabilities for A&EP claims covered by the Loss Portfolio Transfer exceed the aggregate limit of $4.0 billion, or CNA determines it has exposures to A&EP claims not covered by the Loss Portfolio Transfer, CNA may need to increase its recorded net reserves which would result in a charge against CNA’s earnings. These charges could be substantial.

CNA’s premium writings and profitability are affected by the availability and cost of reinsurance.

CNA purchases reinsurance to help manage its exposure to risk. Under CNA’s ceded reinsurance arrangements, another insurer assumes a specified portion of CNA’s exposure in exchange for a specified portion of policy premiums. Market conditions determine the availability and cost of the reinsurance protection CNA purchases, which affects the level of its business and profitability, as well as the level and types of risk CNA retains. If CNA is unable to obtain sufficient reinsurance at a cost it deems acceptable, CNA may be unwilling to bear the increased risk and would reduce the level of its underwriting commitments.

CNA may not be able to collect amounts owed to it by reinsurers which could result in higher net incurred losses.

CNA has significant amounts recoverable from reinsurers which are reported as receivables on its balance sheets and are estimated in a manner consistent with claim and claim adjustment expense reserves or future policy benefits reserves. The ceding of insurance does not, however, discharge CNA’s primary liability for claims. As a result, CNA is subject to credit risk relating to its ability to recover amounts due from reinsurers. In the past, certain of CNA’s reinsurance carriers have experienced credit downgrades by rating agencies within the term of CNA’s contractual relationship. Such action increases the likelihood that CNA will not be able to recover amounts due. In addition, reinsurers could dispute amounts which CNA believes are due to it. If CNA is not able to collect the amounts dueCNA collects from reinsurers are less than the amount recorded for any of the foregoing reasons, its net incurred losses will be higher.

CNA may not be able to collect amounts owed to it by policyholders who hold deductible policies which could result in higher net incurred losses.

A portion of CNA’s business is written under deductible policies. Under these policies, CNA is obligated to pay the related insurance claims and are reimbursed by the policyholder to the extent of the deductible, which may be significant. As a result CNA is exposed to credit risk to the policyholder. If CNA is not able to collect the amounts due from policyholders, its incurred losses will be higher.

CNA has incurred and may continue to incur significant realized and unrealized investment losses and volatility in net investment income arising from volatilitychanges in the capital and creditfinancial markets.

CNA’s investment portfolio is exposed to various risks, such as interest rate, credit, equity and currency risks, many of which are unpredictable. Investment returnsFinancial markets are an important part of CNA’s overall profitability. Generalhighly sensitive to changes in economic conditions, changesmonetary policies, domestic and international geopolitical issues and many other factors. Changes in financial

markets such asincluding fluctuations in interest rates, credit, conditionsequity and currency commodity and stock prices, and many other factors beyond CNA’s control can adversely affect the value of its investments and the realization of investment income. Further,

CNA has significant holdings in fixed maturity investments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. A decline in interest rates may reduce the returns earned on new fixed maturity investments, thereby reducing CNA’s net investment income, while an increase in interest rates may reduce the value of its existing fixed maturity investments. The value of CNA’s fixed maturity investments is also subject to risk that certain investments may default or become impaired due to deterioration in the financial condition of issuers of the investments CNA holds. Any such impairments which CNA deems to be other-than-temporary would result in a charge to its earnings.

In addition, CNA invests a portion of its assets in equity securities and limited partnerships which are subject to greater market volatility than its fixed incomematurity investments. In addition, limitedLimited partnership investments generally present, higher illiquidityprovide a lower level of liquidity than fixed income investments.maturity or equity investments and therefore may also limit CNA’s ability to withdraw assets. As a result of all of these factors, CNA may not realizeearn an adequate return on its investments, may incur losses on salesthe disposition of its investments, and may be required to write-down the value of its investments.

CNA’s valuation of investments and impairment of securities requires significant judgment which is inherently uncertain.

CNA exercises significant judgment in analyzing and validating fair values, which are primarily provided by third parties, for securities in its investment portfolio including those that are not regularly traded in active markets. CNA also exercises significant judgment in determining whether the impairment of particular investments is temporary or other-than-temporary. The valuation of residential and commercial mortgage and other asset backed securities can be particularly sensitive to fairly small changes in collateral performance. Due to the inherent uncertainties involved with these judgments, CNA may incur unrealized losses and conclude that other-than-temporary write-downs of its investments are required.

CNA is subject to capital adequacy requirements and, if it is unable to maintain or raise sufficient capital to meet these requirements, regulatory agencies may restrict or prohibit CNA from operating its business.

Insurance companies such as CNA are subject to capital adequacy standards set by regulators to help identify companies that merit further regulatory attention. These standards apply specified risk factors to various asset, premium and reserve components of statutory capital and surplus reported in CNA’s statutory basis of accounting financial statements. Current rules, including those promulgated by insurance regulators and specialized markets such as Lloyd’s, require companies to maintain statutory capital and surplus at a specified minimum level determined using the applicable regulatory capital adequacy formula. If CNA does not meet these minimum requirements, CNA may be restricted or prohibited from operating its business. If CNA is required to record a material charge against earnings in connection with a change in estimates or the occurrence of an event or if it incurs significant losses related to its investment portfolio, CNA may violate these minimum capital adequacy requirements unless it is able to raise sufficient additional capital.

While we have provided CNA with substantial amounts of capital in prior years, we may be restricted in our ability or may not be willing to provide additional capital support to CNA in the future. If CNA is in need of additional capital, CNA may be required to secure this funding from sources other than us. CNA may be limited in its ability to raise significant amounts of capital on favorable terms or at all.

CNA’s insurance subsidiaries, upon whom CNA depends for dividends in order to fund its working capital needs, are limited by insurance regulators in their ability to pay dividends.

CNA is a holding company and is dependent upon dividends, loans and other sources of cash from its subsidiaries in order to meet its obligations. Ordinary dividend payments or dividends that do not require prior approval by the insurance subsidiaries’ domiciliary insurance regulator are generally limited to amounts determined by formula which varies by jurisdiction. The formula for the majority of domestic states is the greater of 10% of the prior year statutory surplus or the prior year statutory net income, less the aggregate of all dividends paid during the twelve months prior to the date of payment. Some jurisdictions including certain domestic states, however, have an additional stipulation that dividends cannot exceed the prior year’s earned surplus. If CNA is restricted, by regulatory rule or otherwise, from paying or receiving inter-companyintercompany dividends, CNA may not be able to fund its working capital needs and debt service requirements from available cash. As a result, CNA would need to look to other sources of capital which may be more expensive or may not be available at all.

Rating agencies may downgrade their ratings of CNA and thereby adversely affect its ability to write insurance at competitive rates or at all.

Ratings are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies. CNA’s insurance company subsidiaries, as well as CNA’s public debt, are rated by rating agencies, namely, A.M. Best Company (“A.M. Best”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”). Ratings reflect the rating agency’s opinions of an insurance company’s or insurance holding company’s financial strength, capital adequacy, operating performance, strategic position and ability to meet its obligations to policyholders and debt holders.

Due to the intense competitive environment in which CNA operates, the uncertainty in determining reserves and the potential for CNA to take material unfavorable net prior year development in the future, and possible changes in the methodology or criteria applied by the rating agencies, the rating agencies may take action to lower CNA’s ratings in the future. If CNA’s property and casualty insurance financial strength ratings are downgraded below current levels, CNA’s business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. The severity of the impact on CNA’s business is dependent on the level of downgrade and, for certain products, which rating agency takes the rating action. Among the adverse effects in the event of such downgrades would be the inability to obtain a material volume of business from certain major insurance brokers, the inability to sell a material volume of CNA’s insurance products to certain markets, and the required collateralization of certain future payment obligations or reserves.

In addition, it is possible that a lowering of our corporate debt ratings by certain of the rating agencies could result in an adverse impact on CNA’s ratings, independent of any change in CNA’s circumstances. CNA has entered into several settlement agreements and assumed reinsurance contracts that require collateralization of future payment obligations and assumed reserves if its ratings or other specific criteria fall below certain thresholds. The ratings triggers are generally more than one level below CNA’s current ratings.

Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiary, Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.

Diamond Offshore’s business depends on the level of activity in the oil and gas industry, which is significantly affected by volatile oil and gas prices.

Diamond Offshore’s business depends on the level of activity in offshore oil and gas exploration, development and production in markets worldwide. Worldwide demand for oil and gas, oil and gas prices, market expectations of potential changes in these prices and a variety of political and economic factors significantly affect this level of activity. However, higher or lower commodity demand and prices do not necessarily translate into increased or decreased drilling activity since Diamond Offshore’s customers’ project development time, reserve replacement needs, as well as expectations of future commodity demand and prices all combine to affect demand for Diamond Offshore’s rigs. In addition, the level of offshore drilling activity may be adversely affected if operators reduce or defer new investment in offshore projects or reallocate their drilling budgets away from offshore drilling in favor of shale plays or other land-based energy markets, which could reduce demand for Diamond Offshore’s rigs and newbuilds. Oil and gas prices have been, and are expected to continue to be, extremely volatile and are affected by numerous factors beyond Diamond Offshore’s control, including:

 

  

worldwide demand for oil and gas;

 

  

the level of economic activity in energy-consuming markets;

 

  

the worldwide economic environment or economic trends, such as recessions;

 

  

the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, commonly called OPEC, to set and maintain production levels and pricing;

 

  

the level of production in non-OPEC countries;

 

  

the worldwide political and military environment, including uncertainty or instability resulting from an escalation or additional outbreak of armed hostilities in the Middle East, other oil-producing regions or other geographic areas or further acts of terrorism in the United States or elsewhere;

  

civil unrest;

  

the cost of exploring for, producing and delivering oil and gas;

 

  

the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves;

 

  

the rate of decline of existing and new oil and gas reserves;

 

  

available pipeline and other oil and gas transportation and refining capacity;

 

  

the ability of oil and gas companies to raise capital;

 

  

weather conditions;

 

  

natural disasters or incidents resulting from operating hazards inherent in offshore drilling, such as oil spills;

 

  

the policies of various governments regarding exploration and development of their oil and gas reserves;

 

  

development and exploitation of alternative fuels or energy sources;

 

  

competition for customers’ drilling budgets from land-based energy markets around the world;

 

  

laws and regulations relating to environmental or energy security matters, including those addressing the risks of global climate change;

domestic and foreign tax policy; and

 

  

advances in exploration and development technology.

Diamond Offshore’s business involves numerous operating hazards which could expose it to significant losses and significant damage claims. Diamond Offshore is not fully insured against all of these risks and its contractual indemnity provisions may not  fully protect Diamond Offshore.

Diamond Offshore’s operations are subject to the significant hazards inherent in drilling for oil and gas offshore, such as blowouts, reservoir damage, loss of production, loss of well control, unstable or faulty sea floor conditions, fires and natural disasters such as hurricanes. The occurrence of any of these types of events could result in the suspension of drilling operations, damage to or destruction of the equipment involved and injury or death to rig personnel, damage to producing or potentially productive oil and gas formations, and oil spillage, oil leaks, well blowouts and extensive uncontrolled fires, any of which could cause significant environmental damage. In addition, offshore drilling operations are subject to perils peculiar to marine operations, including capsizing, grounding, collision and loss or damage from severe weather. Operations also may be suspended because of machinery breakdowns, abnormal drilling conditions, failure of suppliers or subcontractors to perform or supply goods or services or personnel shortages.

ConsistentDiamond Offshore’s drilling contracts with industry practice,its customers provide for varying levels of indemnity and allocation of liabilities between its customers and Diamond Offshore with respect to the hazards and risks inherent in, and damages or losses arising out of, its operations, and Diamond Offshore may not be fully protected. Diamond Offshore’s contracts with its customers generally contain contractual rights to indemnityprovide that Diamond Offshore and its customers each assume liability for their respective personnel and property. Diamond Offshore’s contracts also generally provide that its customers assume most of the responsibility for and indemnify Diamond Offshore against loss, damage or other liability resulting from, its customer for, among other things,hazards and risks, pollution originating from the well and subsurface damage or loss, while Diamond Offshore typically retains responsibility for and indemnifies its customers against pollution originating from the rig. However, in certain drilling contracts Diamond Offshore’s contractual rightsOffshore may not be fully indemnified by its customers for damage to indemnificationtheir property and/or the property of their other contractors. In certain contracts Diamond Offshore may be unenforceableassume liability for losses or limited due todamages (including punitive damages) resulting from pollution or contamination caused by negligent or willful acts of commission or omission by itself,Diamond Offshore, its suppliers and/or subcontractors, generally subject to negotiated caps on a per occurrence basis and/or on an aggregate basis for the term of the contract. In some cases, suppliers or subcontractors who provide equipment or services to

Diamond Offshore may seek to limit their liability resulting from pollution or contamination. Diamond Offshore’s contracts are individually negotiated, and the levels of indemnity and allocation of liabilities in them can vary from contract to contract depending on market conditions, particular customer requirements and other factors existing at the time a contract is negotiated.

Additionally, the enforceability of indemnification provisions in Diamond Offshore’s contracts may be limited or prohibited by applicable law or may not be enforced by courts having jurisdiction, and Diamond Offshore could be held liable for substantial losses or damages and for fines and penalties imposed by regulatory authorities. The indemnification provisions of Diamond Offshore’s contracts may be subject to differing interpretations, and the laws or courts of certain jurisdictions may enforce such provisions while other laws or courts may find them to be unenforceable, void or limited by public policy considerations, including when the cause of the underlying loss or damage is Diamond Offshore’s gross negligence or willful misconduct, when punitive damages are attributable to Diamond Offshore or when fines or penalties are imposed directly against Diamond Offshore. The law with respect to the enforceability of indemnities varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and is unsettled under certain laws that are applicable to Diamond Offshore’s contracts. Current or future litigation in particular jurisdictions, whether or not Diamond Offshore is a party, may impact the interpretation and enforceability of indemnification provisions in its contracts. There can be no assurance that Diamond Offshore’s contracts with its customers, suppliers and subcontractors will fully protect it against all hazards and risks inherent in its operations. There can also be no assurance that those parties with contractual obligations to indemnify Diamond Offshore’s customers may dispute,Offshore will be financially able to do so or be unable to meet,will otherwise honor their contractual indemnification obligations.

Diamond Offshore maintains liability insurance, which includes coverage for environmental damage; however, because of contractual provisions and policy limits, Diamond Offshore’s insurance coverage may not adequately cover its losses and claim costs. In addition, pollution and environmental risks are generally not fully insurable when they are determined to be the result of criminal acts. Also, Diamond Offshore does not typically purchase loss-of-hire insurance to cover lost revenues when a rig is unable to work. Moreover, insurance costs across the industry have increased following the Macondo incident and, in the future, certain insurance coverage is likely to become more costly and may become less available or not available at all.

Diamond Offshore believes that the policy limit under its marine liability insurance is within the range that is customary for companies of its size in the offshore drilling industry and is appropriate for its business. However, if an accident or other event occurs that exceeds Diamond Offshore’s coverage limits or is not an insurable event under its insurance policies, or is not fully covered by contractual indemnity, it could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. There can be no assurance that Diamond Offshore will continue to carry the insurance it currently maintains, that its insurance will cover all types of losses or that those parties with contractual obligations to indemnify Diamond Offshore will necessarily be financially able to indemnify Diamond Offshore against all of these risks. In addition, no assurance can be made that Diamond Offshore will be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at rates it considers to be reasonable or that Diamond Offshore will be able to obtain insurance against some risks.

Diamond Offshore’s industry is highly competitive and cyclical, with intense price competition.

The offshore contract drilling industry is highly competitive with numerous industry participants, none of which at the present time has a dominant market share. Some of Diamond Offshore’s competitors may have greater financial or other resources than it does. The drilling industry has experienced consolidation in the past and may experience additional consolidation, which could create additional large competitors. Drilling contracts are traditionally awarded on a competitive bid basis. Price is typically the primary factor in determining which qualified contractor is awarded a job; however, rig availability and location, a drilling contractor’s safety record and the quality and technical capability of service and equipment may also be considered.

Diamond Offshore’s industry has historically been cyclical. There have been periods of lower demand, excess rig supply and low dayrates, followed by periods of high demand, short rig supply and high dayrates. Diamond Offshore cannot predict the timing or duration of such business cycles. Periods of lower demand or excess rig supply intensify the competition in the industry and often result in periods of low utilization. During these periods, Diamond Offshore’s existing rigs beingand newbuilds may not obtain contracts for future work and may be idle for long periods of time. Prolongedtime or may be able to obtain work only under contracts with lower dayrates or less favorable terms. Additionally, prolonged periods of low utilization and dayrates could also result in the recognition of impairment charges on certain of Diamond Offshore’s drilling rigs if future cash flow estimates, based upon information available to management at the time, indicate that the carrying value of these rigs may not be recoverable.

Significant new rig construction and upgrades of existing drilling rigs could also intensify price competition. Based on analyst reports, Diamond Offshore believes that there are approximately 67100 floaters on order and scheduled for delivery between 20132014 and 2016, with approximately 75%32% of these rigs scheduled for delivery in 2013 and 2014. The resulting increases in rig supply could be sufficient to depress rig utilization and intensify price competition from both existing competitors, as well as new entrants into the offshore drilling market. Not all of the rigs currently under construction have been contracted for future work, which may further intensify price competition as scheduled delivery dates occur. The majority of the floaters on order are dynamically positioned drilling rigs, which further increases competition with Diamond Offshore’s fleet in certain circumstances, depending on customer requirements. In Brazil, Petrobras, which accounted for approximately 33%34% of Diamond Offshore’s consolidated revenues in 20122013 and, as of February 1, 2013,5, 2014, accounted for approximately $2.6$1.0 billion and $500 million of contract drilling backlog throughin 2014 and in the aggregate for the years 2015 and 2016 and to which nine10 of Diamond Offshore’s floaters are currently contracted, has announced plans to construct locally 2928 new ultra-deepwater drilling units to be delivered beginning in 2015. These new drilling rigs, if built, would increase rig supply and could intensify price competition in Brazil as well as other markets as they enter the market, would compete with, and could displace, both Diamond Offshore’s deepwater and ultra-deepwater floaters coming off contract as well as its newbuilds coming to market and could materially adversely affect Diamond Offshore’s utilization rates, particularly in Brazil.

Diamond Offshore may not be able to renew or replace expiring contracts for its existing rigs or obtain contracts for its uncontracted newbuilds.

Diamond Offshore has a number of customer contracts that will expire in 2014 and 2015. Additionally, certain of its newbuilds that are expected to come to market during 2014 are contracted on a short term basis or are currently uncontracted. Although Diamond Offshore will seek to secure contracts for these units before construction is completed, its ability to renew or replace expiring contracts or obtain new contracts, and the terms of any such contracts, will depend on various factors, including market conditions and the specific needs of its customers. Given the highly competitive and historically cyclical nature of the industry, Diamond Offshore may be required to renew or replace expiring contracts or obtain new contracts at dayrates that are below, and potentially substantially below, existing dayrates, or may be unable to secure contracts for these units.

Diamond Offshore can provide no assurance that its current backlog of contract drilling revenue will be ultimately realized.

As of February 1, 2013,5, 2014, Diamond Offshore’s contract drilling backlog was approximately $8.6$6.8 billion for contracted future work extending, in some cases, until 2019. Generally, contract backlog only includes future revenues under firm commitments; however, from time to time, Diamond Offshore may report anticipated commitments for which definitive agreements have not yet been, but are expected to be, executed. Diamond Offshore can provide no assurance that it will be able to perform under these contracts due to events beyond its control or that Diamond Offshore will be able to ultimately execute a definitive agreement in cases where one does not currently exist. In addition, Diamond Offshore can provide no assurance that its customers will be able to or

willing to fulfill their contractual commitments. Diamond Offshore’s inability to perform under its contractual obligations or to execute definitive agreements, or its customers’ inability or unwillingness to fulfill their contractual commitments, may have a material adverse effect on Diamond Offshore’s business.

Diamond Offshore relies heavily on a relatively small number of customers and the loss of a significant customer and/or a dispute that leads to the loss of a customer could have a material adverse impact on its financial results.

Diamond Offshore provides offshore drilling services to a customer base that includes major and independent oil and gas companies and government-owned oil companies. In 2012,2013, Diamond Offshore’s five largest customers in the aggregate accounted for 62%54% of its consolidated revenues. Diamond Offshore expects Petrobras, and OGX, which accounted for approximately 33% and 12%34% of Diamond Offshore’s consolidated revenues in 2012,2013, to continue to be a significant customerscustomer in 2013.2014. Diamond Offshore’s contract drilling backlog, as of February 1, 2013,5, 2014, includes $1.0 billion, or 36%, in 2014 and $187$500 million or 7% of its contracted backlogin aggregate for 2013,the years 2015 and 2016, which is attributable to contracts with Petrobras and OGX for operations offshore Brazil. Petrobras has announced plans to construct locally, 2928 new ultra-deepwater drilling units to be delivered beginning in 2015. These new drilling units, if built, would compete with, and could displace, Diamond Offshore’s deepwater and ultra-deepwater floaters coming off contract and could

materially adversely affect utilization rates, particularly in Brazil. In addition, if Petrobras or another significant customer experiences liquidity constraints or other financial difficulties, it could materially adversely affect Diamond Offshore’s utilization rates in Brazil or other markets and also displace demand for its other drilling rigs and newbuilds as the resulting excess supply enters the market. While it is normal for Diamond Offshore’s customer base to change over time as work programs are completed, the loss of, or a significant reduction in the number of rigs contracted with, any major customer may have a material adverse effect on Diamond Offshore’s business.

The terms of Diamond Offshore’s drilling contracts may limit its ability to attain profitability in a declining market or to benefit  from increasing dayrates in an improving market.

The duration of offshore drilling contracts is generally determined by customer requirements and, to a lesser extent, the respective management strategies of the offshore drilling contractors. In periods of decreasing demand for offshore rigs, drilling contractors generally prefer longer term contracts but often at flat or slightly lower dayrates, to preserve dayrates at existing levels and ensure utilization, while customers prefer shorter contracts that allow them to more quickly obtain the benefit of lower dayrates. Conversely, in periods of rising demand for offshore rigs, contractors typically prefer shorter contracts that allow them to more quickly profit from increasing dayrates. In contrast, during these periodsdayrates, while customers with reasonably definite drilling programs typically prefer longer term contracts to maintain dayrate prices at a consistent level. An inabilityDiamond Offshore may be exposed to obtain longerdecreasing dayrates if any of its rigs are working under short term contracts during a declining market. Likewise, if any of its rigs are committed under long term contracts during an improving market, Diamond Offshore may be unable to enjoy the benefit of rising dayrates for the duration of those contracts. Exposure to falling dayrates in a declining market or the inability to fully benefit from increasing dayrates in an improving market through shorter term contracts may limit Diamond Offshore’s profitability.

Contracts for Diamond Offshore’s drilling rigs are generally fixed dayrate contracts, and increases in Diamond Offshore’s operating costs could adversely affect the profitability on those contracts.

Diamond Offshore’s contracts for its drilling rigs provide for the payment of a fixed dayrate per rig operating day, although some contracts do provide for a limited escalation in dayrate due to increased operating costs incurred by Diamond Offshore. Many of Diamond Offshore’s operating costs, such as labor costs, are unpredictable and fluctuate based on events beyond Diamond Offshore’s control. In addition, equipment repair and maintenance expenses fluctuate depending on the type of activity the rig is performing, the age and condition of the equipment and general market factors impacting relevant parts, components and services. The gross margin that Diamond Offshore realizes on these fixed dayrate contracts will fluctuate based on variations in Diamond Offshore’s operating costs over the terms of the contracts. In addition, for contracts with dayrate escalation clauses, Diamond Offshore may be unable to fully recover increased or unforeseen costs from its customers.

Diamond Offshore’s drilling contracts may be terminated due to events beyond its control.

Diamond Offshore’s customers may terminate some of their term drilling contracts if the drilling rig is destroyed or lost or if Diamond Offshore has to suspend drilling operations for a specified period of time as a result of a breakdown of major equipment or, in some cases, due to other events beyond the control of either party. In addition, some of Diamond Offshore’s drilling contracts permit the customer to terminate the contract after specified notice periods by tendering contractually specified termination amounts. These termination payments may not fully compensate Diamond Offshore for the loss of a contract. In addition,some cases, because of depressed market conditions, restricted credit markets, economic downturns or other factors beyond Diamond Offshore’s control, its customers may repudiate or otherwise fail to perform their obligations under Diamond Offshore’s contracts with them. Any recovery Diamond Offshore might obtain in these cases may not fully compensate it for the loss of the contract. In any case, the early termination of a contract may result in a rig being idle for an extended period of time. During periodstime, which could have a material adverse effect on Diamond Offshore’s financial condition, results of depressed market conditions, Diamond Offshore may be subject to an increased risk of its customers seeking to repudiate their contracts. Diamond Offshore’s

customers’ ability to perform their obligations under drilling contracts may also be adversely affected by restricted credit marketsoperations and economic downturns.cash flows. If Diamond Offshore’s customers cancel some of their contracts andor if Diamond Offshore iselects to terminate in the event that a customer fails to perform, and are unable to secure new contracts on a timely basis and on substantially similar terms, or if contracts are disputed or suspended for an extended period of time or if a number of Diamond Offshore’s contracts are renegotiated, it could materially and adversely affect Diamond Offshore’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Significant portions of Diamond Offshore’s operations are conducted outside the United States and involve additional risks not associated with domestic operations.

Diamond Offshore operates in various regions throughout the world which may expose it to political and other uncertainties, including risks of:

 

  

war, riot, civil disturbances and civil disturbances;acts of terrorism;

 

  

piracy or assaults on property or personnel;

 

  

kidnapping of personnel;

 

  

seizure, expropriation, nationalization, deprivation, malicious damage, or nationalizationother loss of possession or use of property or equipment;

 

  

renegotiation or nullification of existing contracts;

 

  

disputes and legal proceedings in international jurisdictions;

changing social, political and economic conditions;

 

  

imposition of wage and price controls, trade barriers or import-export quotas;

 

  

foreign and domestic monetary policies;

 

  

the inability to repatriate income or capital;

 

  

difficulties in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods;

 

  

fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

 

  

regulatory or financial requirements to comply with foreign bureaucratic actions;

 

  

travel limitations or operational problems caused by public health threats;

 

  

difficulties in supplying, repairing or replacing equipment or transporting personnel in remote locations;

 

  

difficulties in obtaining visas or work permits for employees on a timely basis; and

 

  

changing taxation policies.policies and confiscatory or discriminatory taxation.

Diamond Offshore is subject to the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and other U.S. laws and regulations governing its international operations in addition to worldwide anti-bribery laws. In addition, international contract drilling operations are subject to various laws and regulations in countries in which Diamond Offshore operates, including laws and regulations relating to:

 

  

the equipping and operation of drilling rigs;

 

  

import - export quotas or other trade barriers;

 

  

repatriation of foreign earnings or capital;

 

  

oil and gas exploration and development;

 

  

local content requirements;

taxation of offshore earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel; and

  

use and compensation of local employees and suppliers by foreign contractors.

Some foreign governments favor or effectively require the awarding of drilling contracts to local contractors, require use of a local agent or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. These practices may adversely affect Diamond Offshore’s ability to compete in those regions. It is difficult to predict what governmental regulations may be enacted in the future that could adversely affect the international offshore drilling industry. The actions of foreign governments may materially and adversely affect Diamond Offshore’s ability to compete.

In addition, the shipment of goods, including the movement of a drilling rig across international borders, subjects Diamond Offshore to extensive trade laws and regulations. Diamond Offshore’s import activities are governed by unique customs laws and regulations that differ in each of the countries in which Diamond Offshore operates and often impose record keeping and reporting obligations. The laws and regulations concerning import/export activity and record keeping and reporting requirements are complex and change frequently. These laws and regulations may be enacted, amended enforced and/or interpreted in a manner that could materially and adversely impact Diamond Offshore’s operations. Shipments can be delayed and denied export or entry for a variety of reasons, some of which may be outside of Diamond Offshore’s control. Shipping delays or denials could cause unscheduled downtime for rigs. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in criminal and civil penalties, economic sanctions, seizure of shipments and/or the contractual withholding of monies owed to Diamond Offshore, among other things.

Diamond Offshore may enter into drilling contracts that exposes it to greater risks than it normally assumes.

From time to time, Diamond Offshore may enter into drilling contracts with national oil companies, government-controlled entities or others that expose it to greater risks than it normally assumes, such as exposure to greater environmental or other liability and more onerous termination provisions giving the customer a right to terminate without cause or upon little or no notice. Upon termination, these contracts may not result in a payment to Diamond Offshore, or if a termination payment is required, it may not fully compensate Diamond Offshore for the loss of a contract. In addition, the early termination of a contract may result in a rig being idle for an extended period of time. For example, Diamond Offshore currently operates, and expects to continue to operate, its drilling rigs offshore Mexico for PEMEX – Exploración y Producción (“PEMEX”), the national oil company of Mexico. The terms of these contracts expose Diamond Offshore to greater environmental liability than it normally assumes, and provide that, among other things, each contract can be terminated by PEMEX on short notice, contractually or by statute, subject to certain conditions. While Diamond Offshore believes that the financial terms of these contracts and its operating safeguards in place mitigate these risks, it can provide no assurance that the increased risk exposure will not have a material negative impact on future operations or financial results.

Fluctuations in exchange rates and nonconvertibility of currencies could result in losses.

Due to Diamond Offshore’s international operations, Diamond Offshore may experience currency exchange losses where revenues are received and expenses are paid in nonconvertible currencies or where it does not effectively hedge an exposure to a foreign currency. Diamond Offshore may also incur losses as a result of an inability to collect revenues because of a shortage of convertible currency available to the country of operation, controls over currency exchange or controls over the repatriation of income or capital. Diamond Offshore can provide no assurance that financial hedging arrangements will effectively hedge any foreign currency fluctuation losses that may arise.

Diamond Offshore may be required to accrue additional tax liability on certain of its foreign earnings.

Certain of Diamond Offshore’s international rigs are owned and operated, directly or indirectly, by Diamond Offshore International Limited (“DOIL”), a wholly owned Cayman Islands subsidiary of Diamond Offshore. It is Diamond Offshore’s intention to indefinitely reinvest future earnings of DOIL and its foreign subsidiaries to finance foreign activities. Diamond Offshore does not expect to provide for U.S. taxes on any future earnings generated by DOIL, except to the extent that these earnings are immediately subjected to U.S. federal income tax. Should a future

distribution be made from any unremitted earnings of this subsidiary, Diamond Offshore may be required to record additional U.S. income taxes.

Rig conversions, upgrades or new buildsnewbuilds may be subject to delays and cost overruns.

From time to time, Diamond Offshore adds new capacity through conversions or upgrades to existing rigs or through new construction, such as its four,three ultra-deepwater drillships and its harsh environment, ultra-deepwater semisubmersible rig under construction and its construction of theOcean Apexand Ocean Onyx. Projects of this type are subject to risks of delay or cost overruns inherent in any large construction project resulting from numerous factors, including the following:

 

  

shortages of equipment, materials or skilled labor;

 

  

work stoppages;

 

  

unscheduled delays in the delivery of ordered materials and equipment;

 

  

unanticipated cost increases;increases or change orders;

 

  

weather interferences or storm damage;

 

  

difficulties in obtaining necessary permits or in meeting permit conditions;

 

  

design and engineering problems;

disputes with shipyards or suppliers;

 

  

availability of suppliers to recertify equipment for enhanced regulations;

 

  

customer acceptance delays;

 

  

shipyard failures or unavailability; and

 

  

failure or delay of third party service providers, civil unrest and labor disputes.

Failure to complete a rig upgrade or new construction on time, or failure to complete a rig conversion or new construction in accordance with its design specifications may, in some circumstances, result in the delay, renegotiation or cancellation of a drilling contract, resulting in a loss of contract drilling backlog and revenue to Diamond Offshore. If a drilling contract is terminated under these circumstances, Diamond Offshore may not be able to secure a replacement contract with equally favorable terms.

Diamond Offshore relies on third-party suppliers, manufacturers and service providers to secure equipment, components and parts used in rig operations, conversions, upgrades and construction.

Diamond Offshore’s reliance on third-party suppliers, manufacturers and service providers to provide equipment and services exposes it to volatility in the quality, price and availability of such items. Certain components, parts and equipment that are used in Diamond Offshore’s operations may be available only from a small number of suppliers, manufacturers or service providers. The failure of one or more third-party suppliers, manufacturers or service providers to provide equipment, components, parts or services, whether due to capacity constraints, production or delivery disruptions, price increases, quality control issues, recalls or other decreased availability of parts and equipment, is beyond Diamond Offshore’s control and could materially disrupt its operations or result in the delay, renegotiation or cancellation of a drilling contract, thereby causing a loss of contract drilling backlog and/or revenue as well as an increase in operating costs.

Diamond Offshore has elected to self-insure for physical damage to rigs and equipment caused by named windstorms in the GOM.

Because the amount of insurance coverage available to Diamond Offshore has been limited, and the cost for such coverage is substantial, Diamond Offshore has elected to self-insure for physical damage to rigs and equipment caused by named windstorms in the GOM. This results in a higher risk of losses, which could be material, that are not covered by third party insurance contracts.

Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiary, Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP

Boardwalk Pipeline may not have sufficient available cash to continue making distributions to unitholders at the current distribution rate or at all.

The amount of cash Boardwalk Pipeline has available to distribute to its unitholders, including us, principally depends upon the amount of cash it generates from its operations and financing activities and the amount of cash it requires, or determines to use, for other purposes, all of which fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on a number of factors. Many of these factors are beyond the control of Boardwalk Pipeline. Some of the factors that influence the amount of cash Boardwalk Pipeline has available for distribution in any quarter include:

fluctuations in cash generated by its operations, including as a result of the seasonality of its business, customer payment issues, general business conditions and market conditions, which impact, for example, contract renewals, basis spreads, time period price spreads, market rates, and supply and demand for natural gas and its services;

the level of capital expenditures it makes or anticipates making, including for expansion and growth projects;

the amount of cash necessary to meet its current or anticipated debt service requirements and other liabilities;

fluctuations in working capital needs;

its ability to borrow funds and/or access capital markets on acceptable terms to fund operations or capital expenditures, including acquisitions; restrictions contained in its debt agreements; and

the cost and form of payment for pending or anticipated acquisitions and growth or expansion projects and the timing and commercial success of any such initiatives.

There is no guarantee that unitholders will receive quarterly distributions from Boardwalk Pipeline. Boardwalk Pipeline’s distributions are determined each quarter by its board of directors based on the board’s consideration of its financial position, earnings, cash flow, current and future business needs and other relevant factors at that time. In February of 2014, Boardwalk Pipeline declared a quarterly distribution of $0.10 per unit, which was less than the quarterly distributions of $0.5325 per unit that Boardwalk Pipeline has declared and paid in recent periods. Boardwalk Pipeline may reduce or eliminate distributions at any time it determines that its cash reserves are insufficient or are otherwise required to fund current or anticipated future operations, capital expenditures, acquisitions, growth or expansion projects, debt repayment or other business needs.

Boardwalk Pipeline may not be able to maintain or replace expiring gas transportation and storage contracts at attractive rates or on a long-term basis.

Each year, a portion of Boardwalk Pipeline’s natural gas transportation contracts expirelong term basis and need to be renewed or replaced. Boardwalk Pipeline may not be able to extend contracts with existing customers or obtain replacement contractssell short term services at attractive rates or forat all due to narrower basis differentials which adversely affect the same termvalue of its transportation services and narrowing of price spreads between time periods and reduced volatility which adversely affect Boardwalk Pipeline’s storage services.

New sources of natural gas continue to be identified and developed in the U.S., including the Marcellus and Utica shale plays which are closer to the traditional high value markets Boardwalk Pipeline serves than the supply basins connected to its facilities. As a result, pipeline infrastructure has been and continues to be developed to move gas and NGLs from these supply basins to market areas, resulting in changes in pricing dynamics between supply basins, pooling points and market areas. Additionally, these new supplies of natural gas have reduced production or slowed production growth from supply areas connected to Boardwalk Pipeline’s pipelines and have caused some of

the gas production that is supplied to Boardwalk Pipeline’s system to be diverted to other market areas. These factors have adversely affected, and are expected to continue to adversely affect, the value of Boardwalk Pipeline’s transportation and storage services and have lowered the volumes Boardwalk Pipeline has transported on its pipelines, as the expiring contracts. further discussed below.

Transportation Services:

A key market driver that influences the rates and terms of itsBoardwalk Pipeline’s transportation contracts is the current and anticipated basis spreadsdifferentials - generally meaning the difference in the price of natural gas at receipt and delivery points on itsBoardwalk Pipeline’s natural gas pipeline systemspipelines - which influence how much

customers are willing to pay to transport gas between those points. Basis differentials can be affected by, among other things, the availability and supply of natural gas, the proximity of supply areas to end use markets, competition from other pipelines, including pipelines under development, available transportation and storage capacity, storage inventories, regulatory developments, weather and general market demand in markets served by itsBoardwalk Pipeline’s pipeline systems. As new sources of natural gas have been identified and developed, changes in pricing dynamics between supply basins, pooling points and market areas have occurred. As a result of the increase in overall pipeline capacity and the new sources of supply and related pipeline infrastructure discussed above, basis spreadsdifferentials on itsBoardwalk Pipeline’s pipeline systems have narrowed over the past severalsignificantly in recent years, reducing the transportation rates and other contract terms Boardwalk Pipeline can negotiate with its customers onfor available transportation capacity and for contracts due for renewal for its firm transportation services. The narrowing of basis differentials has also adversely affected the rates itBoardwalk Pipeline is able to charge for its interruptible and short term firm transportation services.

Each year, a portion of Boardwalk Pipeline’s firm natural gas transportation contracts expire and need to be renewed or replaced. For the reasons discussed above and elsewhere in this Report, in recent periods Boardwalk Pipeline has renewed many expiring contracts at lower rates and for shorter terms than in the past, which has materially adversely impacted its transportation revenues. Boardwalk Pipeline expects this trend to continue and therefore may not be able to sell its available capacity, extend expiring contracts with existing customers or obtain replacement contracts at attractive rates or for the same term as the expiring contracts, which would continue to adversely affect its business.

In 2008 and 2009, Boardwalk Pipeline placed into service a number of large new pipelines and expansions of its system, including its East Texas Pipeline, Southeast Expansion, Gulf Crossing Pipeline and Fayetteville and Greenville Laterals. These projects were supported by firm transportation agreements with anchor shippers, typically having a term of ten years and pricing and other terms negotiated based on then current market conditions, which included wider basis spreads and, correspondingly, higher transportation rates than those prevailing in the current market. As a result, in 2018 and 2019, Boardwalk Pipeline will have significantly more contract expirations than other years. Boardwalk Pipeline cannot predict what market conditions will prevail at the time such contracts expire and what pricing and other terms may be available in the marketplace for renewal or replacement of such contracts. If Boardwalk Pipeline is unable to renew or replace these and other expiring contracts when they expire, or if the terms of any such renewal or replacement contracts are not as favorable as the expiring agreements, Boardwalk Pipeline’s revenues and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Storage and PAL Services:

Boardwalk Pipeline owns and operates substantial natural gas storage facilities. The market for the storage and PAL services that it offers is also impacted by the factors discussed above, as well as natural gas price differentials between time periods, such as winter to summer (time period price spreads), and the volatility in time period price spreads. Recently, the market conditions described above have caused time period price spreads to narrow considerably and price volatility of natural gas to decline significantly, reducing the rates Boardwalk Pipeline is able to obtain on renewalscan charge for its storage and PAL services and adversely impacting the value of expiring contracts are generally lower than those under the expiring contracts, which adversely impacts its revenues and distributable cash.

The development of large new gas supply basinsthese services. These market conditions together with regulatory changes in the U.S. and the overall increase in the supplyfinancial services industry have also caused a number of natural gas created by such development can significantly affect Boardwalk Pipeline’s business.

Growing supplies of natural gas are being produced in new production areas that are not connected to Boardwalk Pipeline’s system and are closer to large end-user market areas than the supply basins connected to its system that traditionally served these markets. For example, gas produced in the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia and Ohio is being shipped to nearby northeast markets such as New York and Philadelphiamarketers, which have traditionally been served by gas produced in Gulf Coast and mid-continent production areas which are connected to its pipelines. This has caused and may continue to cause gas produced in supply areas connected to its system to be diverted to other market areas which may adversely affect capacity utilization and transportation rates on its systems. In addition, as discussed above, growing supplieslarge consumers of natural gas from developing supply basins, especially shale plays, connected to Boardwalk Pipeline’s system have causedstorage and mayPAL services, to exit the market, further impacting the market for those services.

Boardwalk Pipeline expects the conditions described above to continue to cause basis spreads to narrow. All of these dynamicsin 2014 and cannot give assurances they will not continue to impair Boardwalk Pipeline’s ability to renew or replace existing contracts or to sell interruptiblebeyond 2014. These market factors and short term firm transportation services at attractive rates, whichconditions adversely impacts Boardwalk Pipeline’simpact revenues, earnings and distributable cash flows.flow, and could impact Boardwalk Pipeline on a long term basis.

Boardwalk Pipeline may not be successful in executing its strategy to grow and diversify its business.

Boardwalk Pipeline relies primarily on the revenues generated from its long-haul natural gas transportation and storage services. As a result, negative developments in these services have significantly greater impact on its financial condition and results of operations than if Boardwalk Pipeline maintained more diverse assets. Boardwalk Pipeline is pursuing a strategy of growing and diversifying its business through acquisition and development of assets in complementary areas of the midstream energy sector, such as liquids transportation and storage assets, among others. Boardwalk Pipeline may not be successful in acquiring or developing such assets or may do so on terms that ultimately are not profitable.

In pursuing its growth and diversification strategy, Boardwalk Pipeline has been pursuing development (together with a joint venture partner) of a large capital project, the Bluegrass Project, consisting of a pipeline that would deliver NGLs from the Marcellus and Utica shale production areas of Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia to end use markets in the Gulf Coast area, and constructing new fractionation, liquids storage and export facilities located in the Gulf Coast region. Boardwalk Pipeline continues to have ongoing discussions with potential customers regarding commitments that would support constructing this project and has not made any external commitments to proceed with the project. Boardwalk Pipeline may incur substantial costs in developing this or other projects or otherwise pursuing growth and diversification opportunities; however, Boardwalk Pipeline can give no assurance that any such project will be completed, in whole or in part, or, if completed, that any such project or acquisition will be on attractive terms or generate a positive return.

Changes in the priceprices of natural gas and NGLs impacts supply of and demand for those commodities, which impacts Boardwalk Pipeline’s business.

Natural gas prices in the U.S. are currently lower than historical averages driven by the abundant and growing gas supply discussed above. The prices of natural gas and NGLs fluctuatesfluctuate in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors, including:

 

  

worldwide economic conditions;

 

  

weather conditions, seasonal trends and hurricane disruptions;

 

  

the relationship between the available supplies and the demand for natural gas and NGLs;

 

  

new supply sources;

 

  

the availability of adequate transportation capacity;

 

  

storage inventory levels;

 

  

the price and availability of oil and other forms of energy;

 

  

the effect of energy conservation measures;

 

  

the nature and extent of, and changes in, governmental regulation, new regulations adopted by the EPA for example greenhouse gas legislation and taxation; and

 

  

the anticipated future prices of natural gas, oil and other commodities.

It is difficult to predict future changes in natural gas and NGL prices. However, the economic environment that has existed over the last several years generally indicates a bias toward continued downward pressure on natural gas prices. Sustained low natural gas prices could negatively impact producers, including those directly connected to Boardwalk Pipeline’s pipelines that have contracted for capacity with them.them which could adversely impact revenues, earnings and distributable cash flow.

Conversely, future increases in the price of natural gas could make alternative energy sources more competitive and reduce demand for natural gas. A reduced level of demand for natural gas could reduce the utilization of capacity on Boardwalk Pipeline’s systems, reduce the demand for its services and could result in the non-renewal of contracted capacity as contracts expire and affect its midstream businesses.

Changes in the pipeline safety laws and regulations requiring substantial changes to existing integrity management programs or safety technologies could subject Boardwalk Pipeline to increased capital and operating costs and require it to use more comprehensive and stringent safety controls.

Boardwalk Pipeline’s pipelines are subject to regulation by PHMSA of the DOT under the NGPSA with respect to natural gas and the HLPSA with respect to NGLs, both as amended. The NGPSA and HLPSA govern the design, installation, testing, construction, operation, replacement and management of natural gas and NGLs pipeline facilities. These amendments have resulted in the adoption of rules, through PHMSA, that require transportation pipeline operators to implement integrity management programs, including more frequent inspections, correction of identified anomalies and other measures to ensure pipeline safety in high consequence areas, such as high population areas, areas unusually sensitive to environmental damage and commercially navigable waterways. These regulations have resulted in an overall increase in maintenance costs. Due to recent highly publicized incidents on certain pipelines in the U.S., it is possible that PHMSA may develop more stringent regulations. Boardwalk Pipeline could incur significant additional costs if new or more stringent pipeline safety requirements are implemented.

The 2011 Act was enacted and signed into law in early 2012. Under the 2011 Act, maximum civil penalties for certain violations have been increased to $200,000 per violation per day, and from a total cap of $1 million to $2 million. In addition, the 2011 Act reauthorized the federal pipeline safety programs of PHMSA through September 30, 2015, and directs the Secretary of Transportation to undertake a number of reviews, studies and reports, some of which may result in additional natural gas and hazardous liquids pipeline safety rulemaking in 2014 or soon thereafter. A number of the provisions of the 2011 Act have the potential to cause owners and operators of pipeline facilities to incur significant capital expenditures and/or operating costs.

Further, Boardwalk Pipeline has entered into firm transportation contracts with shippers which utilize the design capacity of certain of its pipeline assets, assuming that Boardwalk Pipeline operates those pipeline assets at higher than normal operating pressures (up to 0.80 of the pipeline’s SMYS). Boardwalk Pipeline has authority from PHMSA to operate those pipeline assets at such higher pressures, however PHMSA retains discretion to withdraw or modify this authority. If PHMSA were to withdraw or materially modify such authority, Boardwalk Pipeline may not have sufficient available cash,be able to continue making distributions to unitholders at the current distribution rate or at all.

The amount of cash Boardwalk Pipeline can distribute to its unitholders, including us, principally depends upon the amount of cash it generates from its operations and financing activities and the amount of cash it requires, or determines to use, for other purposes,transport all of which fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on a numberits contracted quantities of factors. Many of these factors are beyond the control of Boardwalk Pipeline. Some of the factors that influence the amount of cash Boardwalk Pipeline has available for distribution in any quarter include:

the level of capital expenditures it makes or anticipates making, including for expansion and growth projects;

the cost and form of payment for pending or anticipated acquisitions and growth or expansion projects and the commercial success of any such initiatives;

the amount of cash necessary to meet its current or anticipated debt service requirements and other liabilities;

fluctuations in working capital needs;

its ability to borrow funds and/or access capital markets to fund operations or capital expenditures, including acquisitions; restrictions contained in its debt agreements; and

fluctuations in cash generated by its operations, including as a result of the seasonality of its business, customer payment issues and general business conditions such as, among others, contract renewals, basis spreads, market rates, and fluctuations in PAL revenues.

Boardwalk Pipeline may determine to reduce or eliminate distributions at any time it determines that its cash reserves are insufficient or are otherwise required to fund current or anticipated future operations, capital expenditures, acquisitions, growth or expansion projects or other business needs. Any such reduction would reduce the amount of cash available to us.

Investments that Boardwalk Pipeline makes, whether through acquisitions or growth projects, that appear to be accretive may nevertheless reduce its distributable cash flows.

Boardwalk Pipeline plans to continue to grow and diversify its business by among other things, investing in assets through acquisitions and organic growth projects. Its ability to grow, diversify and increase distributable cash flows will depend, in part,natural gas on its abilitypipeline assets and could incur significant additional costs to close and execute on accretive acquisitions and projects. Anyre-obtain such transaction involves potential risks that may include, among other things:

the diversion of management’s and employees’ attention from other business concerns;

inaccurate assumptions about volume, revenues and costs, including potential synergies;

a decrease in liquidity as a result of Boardwalk Pipeline using available cashauthority or borrowing capacity to finance the acquisition or project;

a significant increase in interest expense or financial leverage if Boardwalk Pipeline incurs additional debt to finance the acquisition or project;

inaccurate assumptions about the overall costs of equity or debt;

an inability to hire, train or retain qualified personnel to manage and operate the acquired business and assets or the developed assets;

unforeseen difficulties operating in new product areas or new geographic areas; and

changes in regulatory requirements.

Additionally, acquisitions contain the following risks:

an inability to integrate successfully the businesses it acquires;

the assumption of unknown liabilities for which Boardwalk Pipeline is not indemnified, for which its indemnity is inadequate or for which its insurance policies may exclude from coverage;

limitations on rights to indemnity from the seller; and

customer or key employee losses of an acquired business.

Boardwalk Pipeline is exposed to credit risk relatingdevelop alternate ways to nonperformance by its customers.

Credit risk relates to the risk of loss resulting from the nonperformance by a customer ofmeet its contractual obligations. Boardwalk Pipeline’s exposure generally relates to receivables for services provided, future performance under firm agreements and volumes of gas or other products owed by customers for imbalances or product loaned by it to them under certain of its services. For Boardwalk Pipeline’s FERC-regulated business, Boardwalk Pipeline’s tariffs only allow it to require limited credit support in the event that its transportation customers are unable to pay for its services. If any of its significant customers have credit or financial problems which result in a delay or failure to pay for services provided by them or contracted for with them, or to repay the product they owe them, it could have a material adverse effect on Boardwalk Pipeline’s business. In addition, as contracts expire, the credit or financial failure of any of its customers could also result in the non-renewal of contracted capacity, which could have a material adverse effect on its business.

Boardwalk Pipeline depends on certain key customers for a significant portion of its revenues. The loss of any of these key customers could result in a decline in its revenues.

Boardwalk Pipeline relies on a limited number of customers for a significant portion of revenues. Its largest customer in terms of revenue, Devon Gas Services, LP, represented over 12% of its 2012 revenues. Boardwalk Pipeline’s top ten customers comprised approximately 47% of its revenues in 2012. Boardwalk Pipeline may be unable to negotiate extensions or replacements of contracts with key customers on favorable terms which could materially reduce its contracted transportation volumes and the rates it can charge for its services.

Boardwalk Pipeline’s natural gas transportation and storage operations are subject to extensive regulation by FERC, including rules and regulations related to the rates it can charge for its services and its ability to construct or abandon facilities. FERC’s rate-making policies which could limit its ability to recover the full cost of operating its pipelines, including earning a reasonable return.

Boardwalk Pipeline isPipeline’s natural gas transportation and storage operations are subject to extensive regulations relatingregulation by FERC, including the types and terms of services it may offer to customers, construction of new facilities, creation, modification or abandonment of services or facilities, recordkeeping and relationships with affiliated companies. FERC action in any of these areas could adversely affect Boardwalk Pipeline’s ability to compete for business, construct new facilities, offer new services or recover the full cost of operating its pipelines. This regulatory oversight can result in longer lead times to develop and complete any future project than competitors that are not subject to FERC’s regulations. FERC can also deny Boardwalk Pipeline the right to remove certain facilities from service.

FERC also regulates the rates itBoardwalk Pipeline can charge for its natural gas transportation and storage operations. For Boardwalk Pipeline’s cost-based services, FERC establishes both the maximum and minimum rates it can charge. The basic elements that FERC considers are the costs of providing service, the volumes of gas being transported, the rate design, the allocation of costs between services, the capital structure and the rate of return a pipeline is permitted to earn. Boardwalk Pipeline may not be able to recover all of its costs, including certain costs associated with pipeline integrity, through existing or future rates.

Customers or

FERC can challenge the existing rates on any of Boardwalk Pipeline’s pipelines. Such a challenge against them could adversely affect its ability to charge rates that would cover future increases in its costs or even to continue to collect rates to maintain its current revenue levels that are designed to permit a reasonable opportunity to recover current costs and depreciation and earn a reasonable return.

If any of Boardwalk Pipeline’Pipeline’s pipelines under FERC jurisdiction were to file a rate case, or if they have to defend their rates in a proceeding commenced by a customer or FERC, Boardwalk Pipeline would be required, among other things, to establish that the inclusion of an income tax allowance in its cost of service is just and reasonable. Under current FERC policy, since it is a limited partnership and does not pay U.S. federal income taxes, this would require it to show that its unitholders (or their ultimate owners) are subject to federal income taxation. To support such a showing, Boardwalk Pipeline’s general partner may elect to require owners of its units to re-certify their status as being subject to U.S. federal income taxation on the income generated by Boardwalk Pipeline or may attempt to provide other evidence. Boardwalk Pipeline can provide no assurance that the evidence it might provide to FERC will be sufficient to establish that its unitholders (or their ultimate owners) are subject to U.S. federal income tax liability on the income generated by Boardwalk Pipeline’s jurisdictional pipelines. If Boardwalk Pipeline is unable to make such a showing, FERC could disallow a substantial portion of the income tax allowance included in the determination of the maximum rates that may be charged by its pipelines, which could result in a reduction of such maximum rates from current levels.

Pipeline safety laws and regulations requiring the performance of integrity management programs or the use of certain safety technologies could subjectInvestments that Boardwalk Pipeline makes, whether through acquisitions, growth projects or joint ventures, that appear to increased capital and operating costs and require it to use more comprehensive and stringent safety controls.be accretive may nevertheless reduce its distributable cash flows.

Boardwalk Pipeline’s pipelines are subjectgrowth depends on its ability to regulationgrow and diversify its business by among other things, investing in assets through acquisitions or joint ventures and organic growth projects. Its ability to grow, diversify and increase distributable cash flows will depend, in part, on its ability to close and execute on accretive acquisitions and projects. Any such transaction involves potential risks that may include, among other things:

the diversion of management’s and employees’ attention from other business concerns;

inaccurate assumptions about volume, revenues and project costs, including potential synergies;

a decrease in liquidity as a result of Boardwalk Pipeline using available cash or borrowing capacity to finance the acquisition or project;

a significant increase in interest expense or financial leverage if Boardwalk Pipeline incurs additional debt to finance the acquisition or project;

inaccurate assumptions about the overall costs of equity or debt;

an inability to hire, train or retain qualified personnel to manage and operate the acquired business and assets or the developed assets;

unforeseen difficulties operating in new product areas or new geographic areas; and

changes in regulatory requirements or delays of regulatory approvals.

Additionally, acquisitions contain the DOT under the NGPSA with respect to natural gas and the HLPSA with respect to NGLs, both as amended. The NGPSA and HLPSA govern the design, installation, testing, construction, operation, replacement and management of natural gas and NGLs pipeline facilities. These amendments have resulted in the adoption of rules by the DOT, through PHMSA,following risks:

an inability to integrate successfully the businesses it acquires;

the assumption of unknown liabilities for which Boardwalk Pipeline is not indemnified, for which its indemnity is inadequate or for which its insurance policies may exclude from coverage;

limitations on rights to indemnity from the seller; and

customer or key employee losses of an acquired business.

There is no certainty that require transportation pipeline operators to implement integrity management programs, including more frequent inspections, correction of identified anomalies and other measures to ensure pipeline safety in high consequence areas, such as high population areas, areas unusually sensitive to environmental damage, and commercially navigable waterways. These regulations have resulted in an overall increase in maintenance costs. Due to recent highly publicized incidents on certain pipelines in the U.S., it is possible that PHMSA may develop more stringent regulations. Boardwalk Pipeline could incur significant additional costs if newwill be able to complete these acquisitions or more stringently interpreted pipeline safety requirements are implemented.projects on schedule, on budget or at all.

The 2011 Act was enacted and signed into law in early 2012. Under the 2011 Act, maximum civil penalties for certain violations have been increased to $200,000 per violation per day, and from a total cap of $1 million to $2 million. In addition, the 2011 Act reauthorized the federal pipeline safety programs of PHMSA through September 30, 2015, and directs the Secretary of Transportation to undertake a number of reviews, studies and reports, some of which may result in additional natural gas and hazardous liquids pipeline safety rulemaking. A number of the provisions of the 2011 Act have the potential to cause owners and operators of pipeline facilities to incur significant capital expenditures and/or operating costs.

Boardwalk Pipeline needsis exposed to maintain authoritycredit risk relating to nonperformance by its customers.

Credit risk relates to the risk of loss resulting from PHMSA to operate portionsthe nonperformance by a customer of its pipeline systems at higher than normal operating pressures.contractual obligations. Boardwalk Pipeline’s exposure generally relates to receivables for services provided, future performance under firm agreements and volumes of gas or other products owed by customers for imbalances or product loaned by it to them under certain of its services. For Boardwalk Pipeline’s FERC-regulated business, Boardwalk Pipeline’s tariffs only allow it to require limited credit support in the event that its transportation customers are unable to pay for its services. If any of its significant customers have credit or financial problems which result in a delay or failure to pay for services provided by them or contracted for with them, or to repay the product they owe them, it could have a material adverse effect on Boardwalk Pipeline’s business. In addition, as contracts expire, the credit or financial failure of any of its customers could also result in the non-renewal of contracted capacity, which could have a material adverse effect on its business.

Boardwalk Pipeline depends on certain key customers for a significant portion of its revenues. The loss of any of these key customers could result in a decline in its revenues.

Boardwalk Pipeline has entered into firm transportation contracts with shippers which utilize the design capacityrelies on a limited number of certaincustomers for a significant portion of revenues. Its largest customer in terms of revenue, Devon Gas Services, LP, represented over 11% of its pipeline assets, assuming that2013 revenues. Boardwalk Pipeline operates those pipeline assets at higher than normal operating pressures (up to 0.80Pipeline’s top ten customers comprised approximately 46% of the pipeline’s SMYS). Boardwalk Pipeline has authority from PHMSA to operate those pipeline assets at such higher pressures, however PHMSA retains discretion to withdraw or modify this authority. If PHMSA were to withdraw or materially modify such authority,its revenues in 2013. Boardwalk Pipeline may not be ableunable to transport allnegotiate extensions or replacements of contracts with key customers on favorable terms which could materially reduce its contracted quantities of natural gas ontransportation volumes and the rates it can charge for its pipeline assets and could incur significant additional costs to re-obtain such authority or to develop alternate ways to meet its contractual obligations.services.

Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiary, HighMount Exploration & Production LLC

HighMount may not be able to replace reserves and sustain production at current levels.production. Replacing reserves is risky and uncertain and requires significant capital expenditures.

HighMount’s success depends largely upon its ability to find, develop or acquire additional reserves that are economically recoverable. HighMount’s investment opportunities have shifted since 2011 from drilling vertical gas wells to produce gas reserves to more expensive exploratory horizontal wells testing and evaluating non-proven oil resources. The shift from drilling predictable vertical gas wells in mature fields to drilling exploratory horizontal oil wells creates greater uncertainty regarding HighMount’s ability to replenish or grow its reserves. Unless HighMount replaces theits reserves producedthat are depleted by production, negative reserve revisions, or otherwise, through successful development, exploration or acquisition, its proved reserves, and therefore its asset base, will decline over time. HighMount may not be able to successfully find and produce reserves economically in the future or to acquire proved reserves at acceptable costs. HighMount makes a substantial amount of capital expenditures for the acquisition, exploration and development of reserves.reserves and some of those efforts have not, and may in the future not, lead to the successful development of additional reserves, which could result in additional impairment charges, as discussed below, which could be material. HighMount’s net cash flows have been negatively impacted by reduced natural gas and NGL prices as well as increased drilling costs of developing HighMount’s oil reserves. If HighMount’s cash flow from operations is not sufficient to fund its capital expenditure budget, there can be no assurance that financing will be available or available at favorable terms to meet those requirements.

Estimates of natural gas and oil reserves are uncertain and inherently imprecise.

Estimating the volume of proved natural gas and oil reserves is a complex process and is not an exact science because of numerous uncertainties inherent in the process. The process relies on interpretations of available geological, geophysical, engineering and production data. The extent, quality and reliability of this technical data can vary. The process also requires certain economic assumptions, such as oil and gas prices, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and availability of funds. Therefore, these estimates are inherently imprecise.

Actual future production, commodity prices, revenues, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of recoverable reserves most likely will vary from HighMount’s estimates. Any significant variance could materially affect the quantities and present value of HighMount’s reserves. In addition, HighMount may adjust estimates of proved reserves upward or downward to reflect production history, results of exploration and development drilling, prevailing commodity prices and prevailing development expenses.

The timing of both the production and the expenses from the development and production of natural gas and oil properties will affect both the timing of actual future net cash flows from proved reserves and their present value. In addition, the 10% discount factor, used in calculating discounted future net cash flows for reporting purposes, is not necessarily the most accurate representation of their value.

If commodity prices remain depressed, HighMount may be required to take additional write-downs of the carrying values of its properties.

HighMount may be required, under full cost accounting rules, to further write-down the carrying value of its natural gas and oil properties.properties or to impair its other assets, such as its pipeline assets. A number of factors could result in a write-down, including continued low commodity prices, a substantial downward adjustment to estimated proved reserves, a substantial increase in estimated development costs, or deterioration inadditional unsuccessful exploration results. It is difficult to predict future changes in gas prices. However, the abundance of natural gas supply discoveries over the last few years would generally indicate a bias toward downward pressure on prices. HighMount utilizes the full cost method of accounting for its exploration and development activities. Under full cost accounting, HighMount is required to perform a ceiling test each quarter. The ceiling test is an impairment test and generally establishes a maximum, or “ceiling,” of the book value of

HighMount’s natural gas properties that is equal to the expected after tax present value (discounted at the required rate of 10%) of the future net cash flows from proved reserves, including the effect of cash flow hedges, calculated using the average first day of the month price for the preceding 12-month period.

If the net book value of HighMount’s exploration and production (“E&P”) properties (reduced by any related net deferred income tax liability) exceeds its ceiling limitation, HighMount will impair or “write-down” the book value of its E&P properties. HighMount recorded a ceiling test impairment charge in each quartercharges of 2012, totaling$291 million and $680 million ($186 million and $433 million (after taxes)after tax) for the yearyears ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. The 2013 write-downs were primarily attributable to negative reserve revisions due to variability in well performance where HighMount is testing different horizontal target zones and hydraulic fracture designs and due to reduced average NGL prices used in the ceiling test calculations. The 2012 as awrite-downs were the result of declines in natural gas and NGL prices. A write-down may not be reversed in future periods, even though higher natural gas and oil prices may subsequently increase the ceiling. Depending on the magnitude of any future impairment, a ceiling test write-down could significantly reduce HighMount’s income, or produce a loss.

Natural gas, oil and other commodity prices are volatile.

The commodity price HighMount receives for its production heavily influences its revenue, profitability, access to capital and future rate of growth. If the current low price environment for natural gas continues, HighMount’s results of operations will be lower as well. HighMount is subject to risks due to frequent and possibly substantial fluctuations in commodity prices. NGL prices generally fluctuate on a basis that correlates to fluctuations in crude oil prices. In the past, the prices of natural gas and crude oil have been extremely volatile, and HighMount expects this volatility to continue. The markets and prices for natural gas and oil depend upon factors beyond HighMount’s control. These factors include, among others, economic and market conditions, domestic production and import levels, storage levels, basis differentials, weather, government regulations and taxation. Lower commodity prices may reduce the amount of natural gas and oil that HighMount can produce economically.

HighMount engages in commodity price hedging activities.

The extent of HighMount’s commodity price risk is related to the effectiveness and scope of HighMount’s hedging activities. To the extent HighMount hedges its commodity price risk, HighMount will forego the benefits it would otherwise experience if commodity prices or interest rates were to change in its favor. Furthermore, because HighMount has entered into derivative transactions related to only a portion of its natural gas and oil production, HighMount will continue to have direct commodity price risk on the unhedged portion. HighMount’s actual future

production may be significantly higher or lower than HighMount estimates at the time it enters into derivative transactions for that period.

As a result, HighMount’s hedging activities may not be as effective as HighMount intends in reducing the volatility of its cash flows, and in certain circumstances may actually increase the volatility of cash flows. In addition, even though HighMount’s management monitors its hedging activities, these activities can result in substantial losses. Such losses could occur under various circumstances, including if a counterparty does not perform its obligations under the applicable hedging arrangement or if the hedging arrangement is imperfect or ineffective.

Risks Related to Us and Our Subsidiaries Generally

In addition to the specific risks and uncertainties faced by our subsidiaries, as discussed above, we and all of our subsidiaries face risks and uncertainties related to, among other things, terrorism, hurricanes and other natural disasters, competition, government regulation, dependence on key executives and employees, litigation, dependence on information technology and compliance with environmental laws.

Acts of terrorism could harm us and our subsidiaries.

Future terrorist attacks and the continued threat of terrorism in this country or abroad, as well as possible retaliatory military and other action by the United States and its allies, could have a significant impact on the assets and businesses of certain of our subsidiaries. CNA issues coverages that are exposed to risk of loss from a terrorism act. Terrorist acts or the threat of terrorism, including increased political, economic and financial market instability and volatility in the price of oil and gas, could affect the market for Diamond Offshore’s drilling services, Boardwalk Pipeline’s transportation, gathering and storage services and HighMount’s exploration and production

activities. In addition, future terrorist attacks could lead to reductions in business travel and tourism which could harm Loews Hotels. While our subsidiaries take steps that they believe are appropriate to secure their assets, there is no assurance that they can completely secure them against a terrorist attack or obtain adequate insurance coverage for terrorist acts at reasonable rates.

Our subsidiaries are subject to extensive federal, state and local governmental regulations.

The businesses operated by our subsidiaries are impacted by current and potential federal, state and local governmental regulations which impose or might impose a variety of restrictions and compliance obligations on those companies. Governmental regulations can also change materially in ways that could adversely affect those companies. Risks faced by our subsidiaries related to governmental regulation include the following:

CNA.  The insurance industry is subject to comprehensive and detailed regulation and supervision. Most insurance regulations are designed to protect the interests of CNA’s policyholders and third party claimants rather than its investors. Each jurisdiction in which CNA does business has established supervisory agencies that regulate its business.business, generally at the state level. Any changes in federal regulation could also impose significant burdens on CNA. In addition, the Lloyd’s marketplace sets rules under which its members, including CNA’s Hardy syndicate operate. These rules and regulations include the following:

 

  

standards of solvency, including risk-based capital measurements;

 

  

restrictions on the nature, quality and concentration of investments;

 

  

restrictions on CNA’s ability to withdraw from unprofitable lines of insurance or unprofitable market areas;

 

  

the required use of certain methods of accounting and reporting;

 

  

the establishment of reserves for unearned premiums, losses and other purposes;

 

  

potential assessments for funds necessary to settle covered claims against impaired, insolvent or failed private or quasi-governmental insurers;

  

licensing of insurers and agents;

 

  

approval of policy forms;

 

  

limitations on the ability of CNA’s insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends to us; and

 

  

limitations on the ability to non-renew, cancel, increase rates or change terms and conditions in policies.

Regulatory powers also extend to premium rate regulations which require that rates not be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory. CNA may also be required by the jurisdictions in which it does business to provide coverage to persons who would not otherwise be considered eligible. Each jurisdiction dictates the types of insurance and the level of coverage that must be provided to such involuntary risks. CNA’s share of these involuntary risks is mandatory and is generally a function of its respective share of the voluntary market by line of insurance in each jurisdiction.

Diamond Offshore.The offshore drilling industry is dependent on demand for services from the oil and gas exploration industry and, accordingly, is affected by changing tax and other laws relating to the energy business generally. Diamond Offshore may be required to make significant capital expenditures for additional equipment to comply with governmental laws and regulations. It is also possible that these laws and regulations may in the future add significantly to Diamond Offshore’s operating costs or result in a reduction in revenues associated with downtime required to install such equipment, or may otherwise significantly limit drilling activity.

In the aftermath of the 2010 Macondo well blowout in April of 2010 and the subsequent investigation into the causes of the event, new rules have been implemented for oil and gas operations in the GOM and in many of the international locations in which Diamond Offshore operates, including new standards for well design, casing and cementing and well control procedures, as well as rules requiring operators to systematically identify risks and establish safeguards against those risks through a comprehensive safety and environmental management system (“SEMS”). New regulations may continue to be announced, including rules regarding drilling systems and equipment, such as blowout preventer and well control systems and lifesaving systems as well as rules regarding employee training, engaging personnel in safety management and requiring third party audits of SEMS programs. Such new regulations could require modifications or enhancements to existing systems and equipment, or require new equipment, and could increase Diamond Offshore’s operating costs and cause downtime for its rigs if it is required to take any of them out of service between scheduled surveys or inspections, or if it is required to extend scheduled surveys or inspections, to meet any such new requirements. Diamond Offshore is not able to predict the likelihood, nature or extent of additional rulemaking, nor is it able to predict the future impact of these events on operations. Additional governmental regulations concerning licensing, taxation, equipment specifications, training requirements or other matters could increase the costs of Diamond Offshore’s operations, and enhanced permitting requirements, as well as escalating costs borne by its customers, could reduce exploration activity in the GOM and therefore demand for its services.

Governments in some countries are increasingly active in regulating and controlling the ownership of concessions, the exploration for oil and gas and other aspects of the oil and gas industry. The modification of existing laws or regulations or the adoption of new laws or regulations curtailing exploratory or developmental drilling for oil and gas for economic, environmental or other reasons could materially and adversely affect Diamond Offshore’s operations by limiting drilling opportunities.

Boardwalk Pipeline.  Boardwalk Pipeline’s natural gas transportation and storage operations are subject to extensive regulation by FERC and PHMSA of the DOT among other federal and state authorities. In addition to FERC rules and regulations related to the rates Boardwalk Pipeline can charge for its services, federal regulations extend to pipeline safety, operating terms and conditions of service, the types of services Boardwalk Pipeline may offer, construction or abandonment of facilities, accounting and record keeping, and relationships and transactions with affiliated companies. These regulations can adversely impact Boardwalk Pipeline’s ability to compete for business, construct new facilities, including by increasing the lead times to develop projects, offer new services, or recover the full cost of operating its pipelines.

HighMount.All of HighMount’s operations are conducted onshore in the United States. The U.S. oil and gas industry, and HighMount’s operations, are subject to regulation at the federal, state and local level. Such regulation includes requirements with respect to, among other things: permits to drill and to conduct other operations; provision of financial assurances (such as bonds) covering drilling and well operations; the location of wells; the method of drilling and completing wells; the surface use and restoration of properties upon which wells are drilled; the plugging and abandoning of wells; the marketing, transportation and reporting of production; the valuation and payment of royalties; the size of drilling and spacing units (regarding the density of wells which may be drilled in a particular area); the unitization or pooling of natural gas and oil properties; maximum rates of production from natural gas and oil wells; venting or flaring of natural gas; and the ratability of production and the operation of gathering systems and related assets. Changes in these regulations, which HighMount cannot predict, could be harmful to HighMount’s business and results of operations.

Hydraulic fracturing is a technique commonly used by oil and gas exploration companies, including HighMount, to stimulate the production of oil and natural gas by injecting fluids and sand into underground wells at high pressures, causing fractures or fissures in the geological formation which allow oil and gas to flow more freely. In recent years, concerns have been raised that the fracturing process and disposal of drilling fluids may contaminate underground sources of drinking water. The conference committee report for The Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2010 requested the EPA to conduct a study of hydraulic fracturing, particularly the relationship between hydraulic fracturing and drinking water. In December of 2012 the EPA issued a progress report of the projects the EPA is conducting as part of the study. A final draft report is expected to be released for public comment and peer review in 2014. Several bills were introduced in the 111th and 112th Congresses seeking federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing, which has historically been regulated at the state level, though none of the proposed legislation was passed into law. Similar bills may be introduced in the

current Congress and a number of federal agencies are analyzing, or have been requested to review, a variety of environmental issues associated with hydraulic fracturing. If hydraulic fracturing is banned or significantly restricted by federal regulation or otherwise, it could impair HighMount’s ability to economically drill new wells, which would reduce its production, revenues and profitability.

HighMount owns and operates gas gathering lines and related facilities which are regulated by the DOT and state agencies with respect to safety and operating conditions. PHMSA has established minimum federal safety standards for certain gas gathering lines. PHMSA has indicated that changes to the current regulatory framework are needed to address gas exploration and production activities. If implemented, the new changes could impact HighMount’s ability to transport some of its natural gas or cause HighMount to incur additional costs.

Our subsidiaries face significant risks related to compliance with environmental laws.

Our subsidiaries have extensive obligations and financial exposure related to compliance with federal, state and local environmental laws, many of which have become increasingly stringent in recent years and may in some cases impose strict liability, which could be substantial, rendering a person liable for environmental damage without regard to negligence or fault on the part of that person. For example, Diamond Offshore could be liable for damages and costs incurred in connection with oil spills related to its operations, including for conduct of or conditions caused by others. HighMount is subject to extensive environmental regulation in the conduct of its business, particularly related to the handling and disposal of drilling and production waste products, water and air pollution control procedures, and the remediation of petroleum-product contamination. Boardwalk Pipeline is also subject to laws and regulations, including requiring the acquisition of permits or other approvals to conduct regulated activities, restricting the manner in which it disposes of waste, requiring remedial action to remove or mitigate contamination andresulting from a spill or other release, requiring capital expenditures to comply with pollution control requirements.

We are subject to physical and financial risks associated with climate change.

As awareness of climate change issues increases, governments around the world are beginning to address the matter. This may result in new environmental regulations that may unfavorably impact us, our subsidiaries and their suppliers and customers. We and our subsidiaries may be exposed to risks related to new laws or regulations pertaining to climate change, carbon emissions or energy use that could decrease the use of oil or natural gas, thus reducing demand for hydrocarbon-based fuel and related services provided by our energy subsidiaries. Governments

also may pass laws or regulations encouraging or mandating the use of alternative energy sources, such as wind power and solar energy, which may reduce demand for oil and natural gas. In addition, changing global weather patterns have been associated with extreme weather events and could change longer-term natural catastrophe trends, including increasing the frequency and severity of hurricanes and other natural disasters which could increase future catastrophe losses at CNA and damage to property, disruption of business and higher operating costs at Diamond Offshore, Boardwalk Pipeline, HighMount and Loews Hotels.

There is currently no federal regulation that limits GHG emissions in the U.S. However, several bills were introduced in Congress in recent years that would regulate U.S. GHG emissions under a cap and trade system. Although these bills were not passed into law, some regulation of that type may be enacted in the U.S. in the near future. In addition, in 2009 the EPA adopted regulations under the Clean Air Act requiring the monitoring and reporting of annual GHG emissions by operators of facilities that emit more than 25,000 metric tons of GHG per year, which includes Boardwalk Pipeline and HighMount. Numerous states and several regional multi-state climate initiatives have announced or adopted plans to regulate GHG emissions, though the state programs vary widely. The establishment of a GHG reporting system and registry may be a first step toward broader regulation of GHG emissions. Compliance with future laws and regulations could impose significant costs on affected companies or adversely affect the demand for and the cost to produce and transport hydrocarbon-based fuel, which would adversely affect the businesses of our energy subsidiaries.

Any significant interruption in the operation of critical computer systems could materially disrupt operations.

We and our subsidiaries have become more reliant on technology to help increase efficiency in our businesses. We are dependent upon operational and financial computer systems to process the data necessary to conduct almost all aspects of our businesses. Any failure of our or our subsidiaries’ computer systems, or those of our or their customers, vendors or others with whom we and they do business, could materially disrupt business operations. Computer and other business facilities and systems could become unavailable or impaired from a variety of causes, including among others, storms and other natural disasters, terrorist attacks, utility outages or complications encountered as existing systems are replaced or upgraded. In addition, it has been reported that unknown entities or groups have mounted so-called “cyber attacks” on businesses and other organizations solely to disable or disrupt computer systems, disrupt operations and, in some cases, steal data. Any cyber attacks that affect our or our subsidiaries’ facilities could have a material adverse effect on our and their business or reputation.

Loss of key vendor relationships or failure of a vendor to protect personal information could result in a materially adverse effect on our operations.

We and our subsidiaries rely on services and products provided by many vendors in the United States and abroad. These include, for example, vendors of computer hardware, software and services, as well as other critical materials and services. If one or more key vendors becomes unable to continue to provide products or services, or fails to protect our proprietary information, including in some cases personal information of employees, customers or hotel guests, we and our subsidiaries may experience a material adverse effect on our or their business or reputation.

We could incur impairment charges related to the carrying value of the long-lived assets and goodwill of our subsidiaries.

Our subsidiaries regularly evaluate their long-lived assets and goodwill for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable. Most notably, we could incur impairment charges related to the carrying value of offshore drilling equipment at Diamond Offshore, natural gas and oil properties at HighMount, pipeline equipmentand storage assets at Boardwalk Pipeline and hotel properties owned by Loews Hotels.

We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that a potential impairment exists. The goodwill impairment test requires us to identify reporting units and estimate each unit’s fair value as of the testing date. We calculate the fair value of our reporting units (each of our principal operating subsidiaries) based on estimates of future discounted cash flows, which reflect management’s judgments and assumptions regarding the appropriate risk-adjusted discount rate, future industry conditions and operations and other factors. Asset impairment evaluations are, by nature, highly subjective. The use of different estimates and

assumptions could result in materially different carrying values of our assets which could impact the need to record an impairment charge and the amount of any charge taken.

We are a holding company and derive substantially all of our income and cash flow from our subsidiaries.

We rely upon our invested cash balances and distributions from our subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet our obligations and to declare and pay any dividends to holders of our common stock. Our subsidiaries are separate and independent legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to make funds available to us, whether in the form of loans, dividends or otherwise. The ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us is also subject to, among other things, the availability of sufficient earnings and funds in such subsidiaries, applicable state laws, including in the case of the insurance subsidiaries of CNA, laws and rules governing the payment of dividends by regulated insurance companies, and their compliance with covenants in their respective loan agreements. Claims of creditors of our subsidiaries will generally have priority as to the assets of such subsidiaries over our claims and our creditors and shareholders.

We could have liability in the future for tobacco-related lawsuits.

As a result of our ownership of Lorillard, Inc. (“Lorillard”) prior to the separation of Lorillard from us in 2008 (the “Separation”), from time to time we have been named as a defendant in tobacco-related lawsuits and could be named as a defendant in additional tobacco-related suits, notwithstanding the completion of the Separation. In the Separation Agreement entered into between us and Lorillard and its subsidiaries in connection with the Separation, Lorillard and each of its subsidiaries has agreed to indemnify us for liabilities related to Lorillard’s tobacco business, including liabilities that we may incur for current and future tobacco-related litigation against us. An adverse decision in a tobacco-related lawsuit against us could, if the indemnification is deemed for any reason to be unenforceable or any amounts owed to us thereunder are not collectible, in whole or in part, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and equity. We do not expect that the Separation will alter the legal exposure of either entity with respect to tobacco-related claims. We do not believe that we have any liability for tobacco-related claims, and we have never been held liable for any such claims.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

Our corporate headquarters is located in approximately 136,000 square feet of leased office space in New York City. Information relating to our subsidiaries’ properties is contained under Item 1.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Price Range of Common Stock

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “L.” The following table sets forth the reported high and low sales prices in each calendar quarter:

 

  2012  2011           2013                   2012         
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  High           Low      High      Low     High   Low   High   Low 

 

 

First Quarter

       $    40.16       $    37.02       $    45.31       $    39.06            $      44.78    $      41.06    $      40.16    $      37.02      

Second Quarter

   41.80       38.14       44.46       39.99         47.10     42.59     41.80     38.14      

Third Quarter

   42.86       39.04       42.64       33.79         47.94     44.03     42.86     39.04      

Fourth Quarter

   43.36       39.57       41.66       32.90         49.43     46.10     43.36     39.57      

The following graph compares annual total return of our Common Stock, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Index (“S&P 500 Index”) and our Peer Group (“Loews Peer Group”) for the five years ended December 31, 2012.2013. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index and the Loews Peer Group was $100 on December 31, 20072008 and that all dividends were reinvested.

 

 

 2007   2008    2009    2010    2011    2012    2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013 

Loews Common Stock

  100.00   56.48   73.34   79.06   76.98      83.84   100.00     129.84     139.97     136.28     148.43     176.69  

S&P 500 Index

  100.00   63.00   79.67   91.68   93.61   108.59   100.00     126.46     145.51    ��148.59     172.37     228.19  

Loews Peer Group (a)

  100.00   60.93   78.15   86.97   91.66   104.06   100.00     128.27     142.73     150.43     170.78     218.59  

 

(a)

The Loews Peer Group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries: Ace Limited, W.R. Berkley Corporation, Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, The Chubb Corporation, Energy Transfer Partners L.P., Ensco plc, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., Noble Corporation, Range Resources Corporation, Spectra Energy Corp, Transocean Ltd. and The Travelers Companies, Inc.

Dividend Information

We have paid quarterly cash dividends on Loews common stock in each year since 1967. Regular dividends of $0.0625 per share of Loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 20122013 and 2011.2012.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides certain information as of December 31, 20122013 with respect to our equity compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance.

 

Plan category Number of
securities to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
 Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 Number of
securities remaining
available for future
issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in the first column)
  Number of
securities to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
 Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 Number of
securities remaining
available for future
issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in the first column)
 

 

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (a)

  6,535,150             $    36.96          7,129,900          6,476,391             $38.50          6,838,923          

Equity compensation plans not approved by security
holders (b)

  N/A              N/A          N/A              N/A               N/A          N/A              

 

(a)

Reflects stock options and stock appreciation rights awarded under the Loews Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan.

(b)

We do not have equity compensation plans that have not been approved by our shareholders.

Approximate Number of Equity Security Holders

We have approximately 1,1701,090 holders of record of our common stock.

Common Stock Repurchases

We repurchased our common stock in 20122013 as follows:

 

Period Total number of
shares purchased
  Average price
paid per share

 

January 1, 2012 – March 31, 2012

  2,500         $38.42

April 1, 2012 – June 30, 2012

  1,302,700           38.99

July 1, 2012 – September 30, 2012

  2,187,630           40.11

October 1, 2012 – December 31, 2012

  2,060,000           40.60
Period Total number of
shares purchased
 Average price 
paid per share 

January 1, 2013 – March 31, 2013

   2,094,900      $43.70     

April 1, 2013 – June 30, 2013

   1,931,700      44.06     

July 1, 2013 – September 30, 2013

   918,200      45.49     

October 1, 2013 – December 31, 2013

   0      N/A     

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following table presents selected financial data. The table should be read in conjunction with Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.

 

Year Ended December 31  2012 2011 2010 2009 2008   2013   2012   2011   2010   2009 

 

 
(In millions, except per share data)                                

Results of Operations:

                

Revenues

  $  14,552   $  14,129   $  14,615   $  14,117   $  13,247       $15,053     $14,552     $14,129     $14,615     $14,117    

Income before income tax

  $1,399   $2,226   $2,902   $1,728   $594       $1,429     $1,399     $2,226     $2,902     $1,728    

Income from continuing operations

  $1,110   $1,694   $2,008   $1,384   $585       $1,069     $1,110     $1,694     $2,008     $1,384    

Discontinued operations, net

     (20  (2  4,713              (20)     (2)   

 

 

Net income

   1,110    1,694    1,988    1,382    5,298        1,069      1,110      1,694      1,988      1,382    

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (542  (632  (699  (819  (763)       (474)     (542)     (632)     (699)     (819)   

 

 

Net income attributable to Loews Corporation

  $568   $1,062   $1,289   $563   $4,535       $595     $568     $1,062     $1,289     $563    

 

 

Income (loss) attributable to:

      

Loews common stock:

      

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  $568   $1,062   $1,308   $565   $(177)    

Discontinued operations, net

     (19  (2  4,501     

 

Loews common stock

   568    1,062    1,289    563    4,324     

Former Carolina Group stock:

      

Net income attributable to Loews Corporation:

          

Income from continuing operations

  $595     $568     $1,062     $1,308     $565    

Discontinued operations, net

       211              (19)     (2)   

 

 

Net income

  $568   $1,062   $1,289   $563   $4,535       $595     $568     $1,062     $1,289     $563    

 

 

Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share:

      

Diluted Net Income Per Share:

          

Loews common stock:

      

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  $1.43   $2.62   $3.11   $1.31   $(0.37)    

Income from continuing operations

  $1.53     $1.43     $2.62     $3.11     $1.31    

Discontinued operations, net

     (0.04  (0.01  9.43              (0.04)     (0.01)   

 

 

Net income

  $1.43   $2.62   $3.07   $1.30   $9.06       $1.53     $1.43     $2.62     $3.07     $1.30    

 

Former Carolina Group stock:

      

Discontinued operations, net

  $-         $-        $-        $-        $1.95     

 

 

Financial Position:

                

Investments

  $  53,048   $49,028   $48,907   $46,034   $38,450       $   52,973     $   53,048     $   49,028     $   48,907     $   46,034    

Total assets

   80,021    75,268    76,198    73,990    69,791        79,939      80,021      75,268      76,198      73,990    

Debt

   9,210    9,001    9,477    9,485    8,258        10,846      9,210      9,001      9,477      9,485    

Shareholders’ equity

   19,459    18,772    18,386    16,833    13,068        19,458      19,459      18,772      18,386      16,833    

Cash dividends per share:

      

Loews common stock

   0.25    0.25    0.25    0.25    0.25     

Former Carolina Group stock

   -         -         -         -         0.91     

Book value per share of Loews common stock

   49.67    47.33    44.35    39.60    30.04     

Shares outstanding of Loews common stock

   391.81    396.59    414.55    425.07    435.09     

Cash dividends per share

   0.25      0.25      0.25      0.25      0.25    

Book value per share

   50.25      49.67      47.33      44.35      39.60    

Shares outstanding

   387.21      391.81      396.59      414.55      425.07    

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is comprised of the following sections:

 

       Page    
No.

Overview

  

Consolidated Financial Results

  4851

Parent Company Structure

  4852

Critical Accounting Estimates

  4952

Results of Operations by Business Segment

  5255

CNA Financial

  5255

Diamond Offshore

  6568

Boardwalk Pipeline

  7275

HighMount

  7478

Loews Hotels

77

Corporate and Other

79

Liquidity and Capital Resources

80

CNA Financial

80

Diamond Offshore

81

Boardwalk Pipeline

  82

HighMountCorporate and Other

83

Loews Hotels

  84

CorporateLiquidity and OtherCapital Resources

84

Contractual Obligations

  85

InvestmentsCNA Financial

85

Diamond Offshore

  86

Accounting Standards UpdateBoardwalk Pipeline

88

HighMount

89

Loews Hotels

89

Corporate and Other

89

Contractual Obligations

  90

Forward-Looking StatementsInvestments

  9190

Forward-Looking Statements

95

OVERVIEW

We are a holding company. Our subsidiaries are engaged in the following lines of business:

 

  

commercial property and casualty insurance (CNA Financial Corporation (“CNA”), a 90% owned subsidiary);

 

  

operation of offshore oil and gas drilling rigs (Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (“Diamond Offshore”), a 50.4% owned subsidiary);

 

 ��

transportation and storage of natural gas and natural gas liquids and gathering and processing of natural gas (Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (“Boardwalk Pipeline”), a 55%53% owned subsidiary);

 

  

exploration, production and marketing of natural gas and oil (including condensate and natural gas liquids), (HighMount Exploration & Production LLC (“HighMount”), a wholly owned subsidiary); and

 

  

operation of a chain of hotels (Loews Hotels Holding Corporation (“Loews Hotels”), a wholly owned subsidiary).

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Report to “Loews Corporation,” “the Company,” “Parent Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” or like terms refer to the business of Loews Corporation excluding its subsidiaries.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 1A, Risk Factors, and Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.

Consolidated Financial Results

Consolidated net income for the year ended December 31, 20122013 was $595 million, or $1.53 per share, compared to $568 million, or $1.43 per share, compared to $1.1 billion, or $2.62 per share, in 2011. Net income in2012.

Results for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 includes catastrophe losses of $243 millioninclude the following significant items (after tax and noncontrolling interests):

a ceiling test impairment charge at HighMount related to the carrying value of its natural gas and oil properties of $186 million in 2013 and $433 million in 2012;

goodwill impairment charges of $398 million in 2013 primarily related to HighMount reflecting the continued low market prices for natural gas and natural gas liquids and recent history of negative reserve revisions; and

a $111 million charge in 2013 related to CNA’s retroactive reinsurance agreement to cede its legacy asbestos and environmental pollution liabilities to National Indemnity, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. (“Loss Portfolio Transfer” or “LPT”). Under retroactive reinsurance accounting, amounts ceded through the LPT in excess of the consideration paid result in a deferred gain that is recognized in income over future periods. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the cumulative amounts ceded under the LPT exceeded the consideration paid, resulting in the recognition of an accounting loss.

Income before ceiling test and goodwill impairment charges, the impact of the LPT charge and net investment gains was $1.3 billion in 2013 as compared to $968 million in 2012. This increase is primarily due to higher earnings at CNA primarily relatedand increased investment income at the Parent Company due to Storm Sandyimproved performance of equities and after tax ceiling test impairment charges of $433 million at HighMount related to the carrying value of its natural gas and oil properties reflecting declines in natural gas and NGL prices. Lower results at Diamond Offshore also contributed to the reduction in net income,limited partnership investments. These increases were partially offset by higherlower earnings at Boardwalk Pipeline and higher parent company investment income as a result of improved performance of equity investments.Diamond Offshore.

CNA’s earnings declined due toincreased primarily from improved non-catastrophe current accident year underwriting results, higher investment income and lower catastrophe losses related to Storm Sandy andlosses. These increases were partially offset by a lower level of favorable net prior year development in 2012 than in 2011, partially offset by increased investment income. Increased investment income reflects improved performance of limited partnership investments.2013 as compared to 2012. The prior year catastrophe losses included $171 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) related to Storm Sandy.

Diamond OffshoreOffshore’s earnings decreased as a result of lower rig utilization and a decrease in average dayrate partially offset by lower interest expense.

Boardwalk Pipeline’s earnings increased primarily due to lower utilization including downtime for scheduled surveys and shipyard projects and a $27 million charge (after noncontrolling interests) for an uncertain tax position related to Egyptian operations. In addition, Diamond Offshore’s earnings in 2012 included a gain of $32 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) from the contributions from recent acquisitions, lower general and administrative expenses as well as lower impairment charges in 2012.sale of six jack-up rigs.

Book value per share increased to $50.25 at December 31, 2013 from $49.67 at December 31, 2012 from $47.332012. Book value per share excluding Accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) increased to $49.38 at December 31, 2011.2013 from $47.94 at December 31, 2012.

Parent Company Structure

We are a holding company and derive substantially all of our cash flow from our subsidiaries. We rely upon our invested cash balances and distributions from our subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet our obligations and to declare and pay any dividends to our shareholders. The ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends is subject to, among other things, the availability of sufficient earnings and funds in such subsidiaries, applicable state laws, including in the case of the insurance subsidiaries of CNA, laws and rules governing the payment of dividends by regulated insurance companies (see Note 1314 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8) and compliance with covenants in their respective loan agreements. Claims of creditors of

our subsidiaries will generally have priority as to the assets of such subsidiaries over our claims and those of our creditors and shareholders.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, applied on a consistent basis. We continually evaluate the accounting policies and estimates used to prepare the Consolidated Financial Statements. In general, our estimates are based on historical experience, evaluation of current trends, information from third party professionals and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the known facts and circumstances.

We consider the accounting policies discussed below to be critical to an understanding of our Consolidated Financial Statements as their application places the most significant demands on our judgment. Due to the inherent uncertainties involved with these types of judgments, actual results could differ significantly from estimates, which may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations or equity.

Insurance Reserves

Insurance reserves are established for both short and long-duration insurance contracts. Short-duration contracts are primarily related to property and casualty insurance policies where the reserving process is based on actuarial estimates of the amount of loss, including amounts for known and unknown claims. Long-duration contracts include long term care products and payout annuity contracts and are estimated using actuarial estimates about mortality, morbidity and persistency as well as assumptions about expected investment returns. The reserve for unearned premiums on property and casualty contracts represents the portion of premiums written related to the unexpired terms of coverage. The reserving process is discussed in further detail in the Reserves – Estimates and Uncertainties section below.

Reinsurance and Other Receivables

An exposure exists with respect to the collectibility of ceded property and casualty and life reinsurance to the extent that any reinsurer is unable to meet its obligations or disputes the liabilities CNA has ceded under reinsurance agreements. An allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance receivables is recorded on the basis of periodic evaluations of balances due from reinsurers, reinsurer solvency, CNA’s past experience and current economic

conditions. Further information on CNA’s reinsurance receivables is included in Note 1617 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

Additionally, an exposure exists with respect to the collectibility of amounts due from customers on other receivables. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded on the basis of periodic evaluations of balances due currently or in the future, management’s experience and current economic conditions.

If actual experience differs from the estimates made by management in determining the allowances for doubtful accounts on reinsurance and other receivables, net receivables as reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheets may not be collected. Therefore, our results of operations and/or equity could be materially adversely impacted.

Litigation

We and our subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings that have arisen during the ordinary course of business. We evaluate the facts and circumstances of each situation, and when management determines it necessary, a liability is estimated and recorded. Please read Note 1819 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

Valuation of Investments and Impairment of Securities

We classify fixed maturity securities and equity securities as either available-for-sale or trading which are both carried at fair value. Fair value represents the price that would be received in a sale of an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date, the determination of which requires us to make a significant number of assumptions and judgments. Securities with the greatest level of subjectivity around valuation are those that rely on inputs that are significant to the estimated fair value and that are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. These unobservable inputs are based on assumptions consistent with what we believe other market participants would use to price such securities. Further information on fair value measurements is included in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

CNA’s investment portfolio is subject to market declines below amortized cost that may be other-than-temporary and therefore result in the recognition of impairment losses in earnings. Factors considered in the determination of whether or not a decline is other-than-temporary include a current intention or need to sell the security or an indication that a credit loss exists. Significant judgment exists regarding the evaluation of the financial condition and expected near-term and long term prospects of the issuer, the relevant industry conditions and trends, and whether CNA expects to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. CNA has an Impairment Committee which reviews the investment portfolio on at least a quarterly basis, with ongoing analysis as new information becomes available. Further information on CNA’s process for evaluating impairments is included in Note 31 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

Long Term Care Products and Payout Annuity Contracts

Future policy benefit reserves for CNA’s long term carelife and group products and payout annuity contracts are based on certain assumptions including morbidity, mortality, policy persistency and discount rates, which are impacted by expected investment yields.rates. The adequacy of the reserves areis contingent on actual experience related to these key assumptions, which were generally established at time of issue. If actual experience differs from these assumptions, the reserves may not be adequate, requiring CNA to add to reserves. Therefore,

A prolonged period during which interest rates remain at levels lower than those anticipated in CNA’s reserving discount rate assumption could result in shortfalls in investment income on assets supporting CNA’s obligations under long term care policies and payout annuity contracts, which may also require changes to CNA’s reserves.

These changes to CNA’s reserves could materially adversely impact our results of operations and/or equity could be adversely impacted.and equity. The reserving process is discussed in further detail in the Reserves – Estimates and Uncertainties section below.

Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations

We make a significant number of assumptions in order to estimate the liabilities and costs related to our pension and postretirement benefit obligations under our benefit plans. The assumptions that have the most impact on pension costs are the discount rate and the expected long term rate of return on plan assets. These assumptions are evaluated relative to current market factors such as inflation, interest rates and fiscal and monetary policies. Changes in these assumptions can have a material impact on pension obligations and pension expense.

In determining the discount rate assumption, we utilized current market information and liability information, including a discounted cash flow analysis of our pension and postretirement obligations. In particular, the basis for our discount rate selection was the yield on indices of highly rated fixed income debt securities with durations comparable to that of our plan liabilities. The yield curve was applied to expected future retirement plan payments to adjust the discount rate to reflect the cash flow characteristics of the plans. The yield curves and indices evaluated in the selection of the discount rate are comprised of high quality corporate bonds that are rated AA by an accepted rating agency.

Further information on our pension and postretirement benefit obligations is included in Note 1516 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

Valuation of HighMount’s Proved Reserves

HighMount follows the full cost method of accounting for natural gas and oil exploration and production activities. Under the full cost method, all direct costs of property acquisition, exploration and development activities are capitalized and subsequently depleted using the units-of-production method. The depletable base of costs includes estimated future costs to be incurred in developing proved natural gas and oil reserves, as well as

capitalized asset retirement costs, net of projected salvage values. Capitalized costs in the depletable base are subject to a ceiling test. The test limits capitalized amounts to a ceiling, the present value of estimated future net revenues to be derived from the production of proved natural gas and oil reserves, using calculated average prices adjusted for any cash flow hedges in place. If net capitalized costs exceed the ceiling test at the end of any quarterly period, then a write-down of the assets must be recognized in that period. A write-down may not be reversed in future periods, even though higher natural gas and oil prices may subsequently increase the ceiling. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, HighMount recognized non-cash impairment charges of $291 million and $680 million ($433186 million and $433 million after tax) related to the carrying value of natural gas and oil properties, as discussed further in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8. In addition, gains or losses on the sale or other disposition of natural gas and oil properties are not recognized unless the gain or loss would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves.

HighMount’s estimate of proved reserves requires a high degree of judgment and is dependent on factors such as historical data, engineering estimates of proved reserve quantities, estimates of the amount and timing of future expenditures to develop the proved reserves, and estimates of future production from the proved reserves. HighMount’s estimated proved reserves are based upon studies for each of its properties prepared by HighMount staff engineers. Calculations were prepared using standard geological and engineering methods generally accepted by the petroleum industry and in accordance with SEC guidelines. Determination of proved reserves is based on, among other things, (i) a pricing mechanism for oil and gas reserves which uses an average 12-month price; (ii) a limitation on the classification of reserves as proved undeveloped to locations scheduled to be drilled within five years; and (iii) a 10% discount factor used in calculating discounted future net cash flows.

The process to estimate reserves is imprecise, and estimates are subject to revision. If there is a significant variance in any of HighMount’s estimates or assumptions in the future and revisions to the value of HighMount’s proved reserves are necessary, related depletion expense and the calculation of the ceiling test would be affected and recognition of natural gas and oil property impairments could occur. Given the volatility of natural gas and oil prices, it is possible that HighMount’s estimate of discounted future net cash flows from proved natural gas and oil reserves that is used to calculate the ceiling could materially change in the near term.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company uses a probability-weighted cash flow analysis to test property and equipment for impairment based on relevant market data. If an asset is determined to be impaired, a loss is recognized to reduce the carrying amount to the fair value of the asset. Management’s cash flow assumptions are an inherent part of our asset impairment evaluation and the use of different assumptions could produce results that differ from the reported amounts.

Goodwill

Goodwill is required to be evaluated on an annual basis and whenever, in management’s judgment, there is a significant change in circumstances that would be considered a triggering event. Management must apply judgment in assessing qualitatively whether events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Factors such as a reporting unit’s planned future operating results, long term growth outlook and industry and market conditions are considered. Judgment is also applied in determining the estimated fair value of reporting units’ assets and liabilities for purposes of performing quantitative goodwill impairment tests. Management uses all available information to make these fair value determinations, including the present values of expected future cash flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks involved in the assets and observed market multiples.

A ceiling test impairment charge at HighMount is considered a triggering event that requires a goodwill impairment analysis. This analysis resulted in HighMount recording a goodwill impairment charge of $584 million ($382 million after tax), see the Results of Operations by Business Segment section of this MD&A and Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 for additional information.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the financial statement and tax return bases of assets and liabilities. Any resulting future tax benefits are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not, and a valuation allowance is established for any portion of a deferred tax asset that management believes may not be realized. The assessment of the need for a valuation allowance requires

management to make estimates and assumptions about future earnings, reversal of existing temporary differences and available tax planning strategies. If actual experience differs from these estimates and assumptions, the recorded deferred tax asset may not be fully realized resulting in an increase to income tax expense in our results of operations. In addition, the ability to record deferred tax assets in the future could be limited resulting in a higher effective tax rate in that future period.

The Company has not established deferred tax liabilities for certain of its foreign earnings as it intends to indefinitely reinvest those earnings to finance foreign activities. However, if these earnings become subject to U.S. federal tax, any required provision could have a material impact on our financial results.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BY BUSINESS SEGMENT

Unless the context otherwise requires, references to net operating income (loss), net realized investment results and net income (loss) reflect amounts attributable to Loews Corporation Shareholders.shareholders.

CNA Financial

On February 10, 2014, CNA entered into a definitive agreement to sell the majority of its run-off annuity and pension deposit business. Further information on the sale is included in Note 23 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

Reserves – Estimates and Uncertainties

The level of reserves CNA maintains represents its best estimate, as of a particular point in time, of what the ultimate settlement and administration of claims will cost based on CNA’s assessment of facts and circumstances known at that time. Reserves are not an exact calculation of liability but instead are complex estimates that CNA derives, generally utilizing a variety of actuarial reserve estimation techniques, from numerous assumptions and expectations about future events, both internal and external, many of which are highly uncertain. As noted below, CNA reviews its reserves for each segment of its business periodically and any such review could result in the need to increase reserves in amounts which could be material and could adversely impact its results of operations, equity, business and insurer financial strength and corporate debt ratings. Further information on reserves is provided in Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

Property and Casualty Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves

CNA maintains loss reserves to cover its estimated ultimate unpaid liability for claim and claim adjustment expenses, including the estimated cost of the claims adjudication process, for claims that have been reported but not yet settled (case reserves) and claims that have been incurred but not reported (“IBNR”). Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves are reflected as liabilities and are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets under the heading “Insurance Reserves.” Adjustments to prior year reserve estimates, if necessary, are reflected in results of operations in the period that the need for such adjustments is determined. The carried case and IBNR reserves as of each balance sheet date are provided in the discussion that follows and in Note 89 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

The level of reserves CNA maintains represents its best estimate, as of a particular point in time, of what the ultimate settlement and administration of claims will cost based on CNA’s assessment of facts and circumstances known at that time. Reserves are not an exact calculation of liability but instead are complex estimates that CNA derives, generally utilizing a variety of actuarial reserve estimation techniques, from numerous assumptions and expectations about future events, both internal and external, many of which are highly uncertain.

CNA is subject to the uncertain effects of emerging or potential claims and coverage issues that arise as industry practices and legal, judicial, social, economic and other environmental conditions change. These issues have had, and may continue to have, a negative effect on CNA’s business by either extending coverage beyond the original underwriting intent or by increasing the number or size of claims. Examples of emerging or potential claims and coverage issues include:

 

  

uncertainty in future medical costs in workers’ compensation. In particular, medical cost inflation could be greater than expected due to new treatments, drugs and devices; increased health care utilization; and/or the effectsfuture costs of worldwide economic conditions, which have resulted in an increase inhealth care facilities. In addition, the numberrelationship between workers’ compensation and size of certain claims including both directorsgovernment and officers (“D&O”) and errors and omissions (“E&O”) insurance claims relatedprivate health care providers could change, potentially shifting costs to corporate failures, as well as other coverages;workers’ compensation;

 

  

increased uncertainty related to medical professional liability, medical products liability and workers’ compensation coverages resulting from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act;

significant class action litigation relating to claims handling and other practices;litigation; and

 

  

mass tort claims, including bodily injury claims related to welding rods, benzene, lead, noise induced hearing loss, injuries from various medical products including pharmaceuticals and various other chemical and radiation exposure claims.

The impact of these and other unforeseen emerging or potential claims and coverage issues is difficult to predict and could materially adversely affect the adequacy of CNA’s claim and claim adjustment expense reserves and could lead to future reserve additions.

CNA’s property and casualty insurance subsidiaries also have actual and potential exposures related to asbestos and environmental pollution (“A&EP”) claims. CNA’s experience has been that establishing reserves for casualty coverages relating to A&EP claims and the related claim adjustment expenses are subject to uncertainties that are greater than those presented by other claims. Additionally, traditional actuarial methods and techniques employed to estimate the ultimate cost of claims for more traditional property and casualty exposures are less precise in estimating claim and claim adjustment reserves for A&EP. As a result, estimating the ultimate cost of both reported and unreported A&EP claims is subject to a higher degree of variability.

To mitigate the risks posed by CNA’s exposure to A&EP claims and claim adjustment expenses, as further discussed in Note 89 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8, on August 31, 2010, CNA completed a transaction with NICO, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., under which substantially all of CNA’s legacy A&EP liabilities were ceded to NICO effective January 1, 2010 (“Loss Portfolio Transfer”).

The Loss Portfolio Transfer is considered a retroactive reinsurance contract. In the event thatDuring 2013 the cumulative claim and allocated claim adjustment expensesamounts ceded under the Loss Portfolio Transfer exceedexceeded the consideration paid, the resulting gain from such excess would be deferred. A cumulative amortization adjustment wouldin a $189 million deferred retroactive reinsurance gain. This deferred benefit will be recognized in earnings in the period such excess arises so that the resulting deferred gain would reflect the balance that would have existed if the revised estimate was available at the inception date offuture periods in proportion to actual recoveries under the Loss Portfolio Transfer. This accounting generally results in a reserve charge becauseOver the life of the timing difference between the recognition of the gross adverse reserve development and the related ceded reinsurance benefit. However,contract, there is no economic impact as long as theany additional losses are within the limit under the contract. Any future adverse prior year development in excess of approximately $230 million would put the Loss Portfolio Transfer into an overall gain position under retroactive reinsurance accounting.

Establishing Property & Casualty Reserve Estimates

In developing claim and claim adjustment expense (“loss” or “losses”) reserve estimates, CNA’s actuaries perform detailed reserve analyses that are staggered throughout the year. The data is organized at a “product” level. A product can be a line of business covering a subset of insureds such as commercial automobile liability for small or middle market customers, it can encompass several lines of business provided to a specific set of customers such as dentists, or it can be a particular type of claim such as construction defect. Every product is analyzedreviewed at least once during the year, with the exception of certain run-off products which are analyzed on a periodic basis.year. The analyses generally review losses gross of ceded reinsurance and apply the ceded reinsurance terms to the gross estimates to establish estimates net of reinsurance. In addition to the detailed analyses, CNA reviews actual loss emergence for all products each quarter.

The detailed analyses use a variety of generally accepted actuarial methods and techniques to produce a number of estimates of ultimate loss. CNA’s actuaries determine a point estimate of ultimate loss by reviewing the various estimates and assigning weight to each estimate given the characteristics of the product being reviewed. The reserve estimate is the difference between the estimated ultimate loss and the losses paid to date. The difference between the estimated ultimate loss and the case incurred loss (paid loss plus case reserve) is IBNR. IBNR calculated as such includes a provision for development on known cases (supplemental development) as well as a provision for claims that have occurred but have not yet been reported (pure IBNR).

Most of CNA’s business can be characterized as long-tail. For long-tail business, it will generally be several years between the time the business is written and the time when all claims are settled. CNA’s long-tail exposures include commercial automobile liability, workers’ compensation, general liability, medical professional liability, other professional liability and management liability coverages, assumed reinsurance run-off and products liability. Short-tail exposures include property, commercial automobile physical damage, marine and warranty. CNA Specialty and CNA Commercial contain both long-tail and short-tail exposures. Hardy contains primarily short-tail exposures. Other contains long-tail exposures.

Various methods are used to project ultimate loss for both long-tail and short-tail exposures including, but not limited to, the following:

 

  

paid development;

 

  

incurred development;

 

  

loss ratio;

 

  

Bornhuetter-Ferguson using paid loss;

 

  

Bornhuetter-Ferguson using incurred loss;

 

  

frequency times severity; and

 

  

stochastic modeling.

The paid development method estimates ultimate losses by reviewing paid loss patterns and applying them to accident or policy years with further expected changes in paid loss. Selection of the paid loss pattern may require consideration of several factors including the impact of inflation on claims costs, the rate at which claims professionals make claim payments and close claims, the impact of judicial decisions, the impact of underwriting changes, the impact of large claim payments and other factors. Claim cost inflation itself may require evaluation of changes in the cost of repairing or replacing property, changes in the cost of medical care, changes in the cost of wage replacement, judicial decisions, legislative changes and other factors. Because this method assumes that losses are paid at a consistent rate, changes in any of these factors can impact the results. Since the method does not rely on case reserves, it is not directly influenced by changes in the adequacy of case reserves.

For many products, paid loss data for recent periods may be too immature or erratic for accurate predictions. This situation often exists for long-tail exposures. In addition, changes in the factors described above may result in inconsistent payment patterns. Finally, estimating the paid loss pattern subsequent to the most mature point available in the data analyzed often involves considerable uncertainty for long-tail products such as workers’ compensation.

The incurred development method is similar to the paid development method, but it uses case incurred losses instead of paid losses. Since the method uses more data (case reserves in addition to paid losses) than the paid development method, the incurred development patterns may be less variable than paid patterns. However, selection of the incurred loss pattern typically requires analysis of all of the same factors described above. In addition, the inclusion of case reserves can lead to distortions if changes in case reserving practices have taken place, and the use of case incurred losses may not eliminate the issues associated with estimating the incurred loss pattern subsequent to the most mature point available.

The loss ratio method multiplies earned premiums by an expected loss ratio to produce ultimate loss estimates for each accident or policy year. This method may be useful for immature accident or policy periods or if loss development patterns are inconsistent, losses emerge very slowly, or there is relatively little loss history from which to estimate future losses. The selection of the expected loss ratio typically requires analysis of loss ratios from earlier accident or policy years or pricing studies and analysis of inflationary trends, frequency trends, rate changes, underwriting changes, and other applicable factors.

The Bornhuetter-Ferguson method using paid loss is a combination of the paid development method and the loss ratio method. This method normally determines expected loss ratios similar to the approach used to estimate the expected loss ratio for the loss ratio method and typically requires analysis of the same factors described above. This method assumes that future losses will develop at the expected loss ratio level. The percent of paid loss to ultimate loss implied from the paid development method is used to determine what percentage of ultimate loss is yet to be paid. The use of the pattern from the paid development method typically requires consideration of the same factors listed in the description of the paid development method. The estimate of losses yet to be paid is added to current paid losses to estimate the ultimate loss for each year. For long-tail lines, this method will react very slowly if actual

ultimate loss ratios are different from expectations due to changes not accounted for by the expected loss ratio calculation.

The Bornhuetter-Ferguson method using incurred loss is similar to the Bornhuetter-Ferguson method using paid loss except that it uses case incurred losses. The use of case incurred losses instead of paid losses can result in development patterns that are less variable than paid patterns. However, the inclusion of case reserves can lead to distortions if changes in case reserving have taken place, and the method typically requires analysis of the same factors that need to be reviewed for the loss ratio and incurred development methods.

The frequency times severity method multiplies a projected number of ultimate claims by an estimated ultimate average loss for each accident or policy year to produce ultimate loss estimates. Since projections of the ultimate number of claims are often less variable than projections of ultimate loss, this method can provide more reliable results for products where loss development patterns are inconsistent or too variable to be relied on exclusively. In addition, this method can more directly account for changes in coverage that impact the number and size of claims. However, this method can be difficult to apply to situations where very large claims or a substantial number of unusual claims result in volatile average claim sizes. Projecting the ultimate number of claims may require analysis of several factors including the rate at which policyholders report claims to CNA, the impact of judicial decisions, the impact of underwriting changes and other factors. Estimating the ultimate average loss may require analysis of

the impact of large losses and claim cost trends based on changes in the cost of repairing or replacing property, changes in the cost of medical care, changes in the cost of wage replacement, judicial decisions, legislative changes and other factors.

Stochastic modeling produces a range of possible outcomes based on varying assumptions related to the particular product being modeled. For some products, CNA uses models which rely on historical development patterns at an aggregate level, while other products are modeled using individual claim variability assumptions supplied by the claims department. In either case, multiple simulations are run and the results are analyzed to produce a range of potential outcomes. The results will typically include a mean and percentiles of the possible reserve distribution which aid in the selection of a point estimate.

For many exposures, especially those that can be considered long-tail, a particular accident or policy year may not have a sufficient volume of paid losses to produce a statistically reliable estimate of ultimate losses. In such a case, CNA’s actuaries typically assign more weight to the incurred development method than to the paid development method. As claims continue to settle and the volume of paid loss increases, the actuaries may assign additional weight to the paid development method. For most of CNA’s products, even the incurred losses for accident or policy years that are early in the claim settlement process will not be of sufficient volume to produce a reliable estimate of ultimate losses. In these cases, CNA will not assign any weight to the paid and incurred development methods. CNA will use the loss ratio, Bornhuetter-Ferguson and frequency times severity methods. For short-tail exposures, the paid and incurred development methods can often be relied on sooner primarily because CNA’s history includes a sufficient number of years to cover the entire period over which paid and incurred losses are expected to change. However, CNA may also use the loss ratio, Bornhuetter-Ferguson and frequency times severity methods for short-tail exposures.

For other more complex products where the above methods may not produce reliable indications, CNA uses additional methods tailored to the characteristics of the specific situation.

Periodic Reserve Reviews

The reserve analyses performed by CNA’s actuaries result in point estimates. Each quarter, the results of the detailed reserve reviews are summarized and discussed with CNA’s senior management to determine the best estimate of reserves. This group considers many factors in making this decision. The factors include, but are not limited to, the historical pattern and volatility of the actuarial indications, the sensitivity of the actuarial indications to changes in paid and incurred loss patterns, the consistency of claims handling processes, the consistency of case reserving practices, changes in CNA’s pricing and underwriting, pricing and underwriting trends in the insurance market, and legal, judicial, social and economic trends.

CNA’s recorded reserves reflect its best estimate as of a particular point in time based upon known facts, consideration of the factors cited above and its judgment. The carried reserve may differ from the actuarial point estimate as the result of CNA’s consideration of the factors noted above as well as the potential volatility of the projections associated with the specific product being analyzed and other factors impacting claims costs that may not be quantifiable through traditional actuarial analysis. This process results in management’s best estimate which is then recorded as the loss reserve.

Currently, CNA’s recorded reserves are modestly higher than the actuarial point estimate. For CNA Commercial, CNA Specialty and Hardy, the difference between CNA’s reserves and the actuarial point estimate is primarily driven by uncertainty with respect to immature accident years, claim cost inflation, changes in claims handling, changes to the tort reform roll-backsenvironment which may adversely impact claim costs and the effects from the economy. For CNA’s legacy A&EP liabilities, the difference between CNA’s reserves and the actuarial point estimate is primarily driven by the potential tail volatility of run-off exposures.

The key assumptions fundamental to the reserving process are often different for various products and accident or policy years. Some of these assumptions are explicit assumptions that are required of a particular method, but most of the assumptions are implicit and cannot be precisely quantified. An example of an explicit assumption is the pattern employed in the paid development method. However, the assumed pattern is itself based on several implicit assumptions such as the impact of inflation on medical costs and the rate at which claim professionals close claims.

As a result, the effect on reserve estimates of a particular change in assumptions typically cannot be specifically quantified, and changes in these assumptions cannot be tracked over time.

CNA’s recorded reserves are management’s best estimate. In order to provide an indication of the variability associated with CNA’s net reserves, the following discussion provides a sensitivity analysis that shows the approximate estimated impact of variations in significant factors affecting CNA’s reserve estimates for particular types of business. These significant factors are the ones that CNA believes could most likely materially impact the reserves. This discussion covers the major types of business for which CNA believes a material deviation to its reserves is reasonably possible. There can be no assurance that actual experience will be consistent with the current assumptions or with the variation indicated by the discussion. In addition, there can be no assurance that other factors and assumptions will not have a material impact on CNA’s reserves.

Within CNA Specialty, CNA believes a material deviation to its net reserves is reasonably possible for professional liability and related business.management liability products and Surety products. This business includes professional liability coverages provided to various professional firms, including architects, real estate agents, small and mid-sized accounting firms, law firms and technologyother professional firms. This business also includes D&O, employment practices, fiduciary, fidelity and surety coverages, as well as insurance products serving the health care delivery system. The most significant factor affecting reserve estimates for this businessthese products is claim severity. Claim severity is driven by the cost of medical care, the cost of wage replacement, legal fees, judicial decisions, legislative changes and other factors. Underwriting and claim handling decisions such as the classes of business written and individual claim settlement decisions can also impact claim severity. If the estimated claim severity increases by 9%, CNA estimates that the net reserves would increase by approximately $500$550 million. If the estimated claim severity decreases by 3%, CNA estimates that net reserves would decrease by approximately $150$200 million. CNA’s net reserves for this businessthese products were approximately $5.3$5.9 billion at December 31, 2012.2013.

Within CNA Commercial, the two types of business for which CNA believes a materialsignificant deviation to its net reserves is reasonably possible are workers’ compensation and general liability.

For CNA Commercial workers’ compensation, since many years will pass from the time the business is written until all claim payments have been made, claim cost inflation on claim payments is the most significant factor affecting workers’ compensation reserve estimates. Workers’ compensation claim cost inflation is driven by the cost of medical care, the cost of wage replacement, expected claimant lifetimes, judicial decisions, legislative changes and other factors. If estimated workers’ compensation claim cost inflation increases by 100 basis points for the entire period over which claim payments will be made, CNA estimates that its net reserves would increase by approximately $450$400 million. If estimated workers’ compensation claim cost inflation decreases by 100 basis points for the entire period over which claim payments will be made, CNA estimates that its net reserves would decrease

by approximately $400 million. Net reserves for CNA Commercial workers’ compensation were approximately $4.9$4.6 billion at December 31, 2012.2013.

For CNA Commercial general liability, the most significant factor affecting reserve estimates is claim severity. Claim severity is driven by changes in the cost of repairing or replacing property, the cost of medical care, the cost of wage replacement, judicial decisions, legislation and other factors. If the estimated claim severity for general liability increases by 6%, CNA estimates that its net reserves would increase by approximately $250$200 million. If the estimated claim severity for general liability decreases by 3%, CNA estimates that its net reserves would decrease by approximately $100 million. Net reserves for CNA Commercial general liability were approximately $3.8$3.7 billion at December 31, 2012.2013.

Given the factors described above, it is not possible to quantify precisely the ultimate exposure represented by claims and related litigation. As a result, CNA regularly reviews the adequacy of its reserves and reassesses its reserve estimates as historical loss experience develops, additional claims are reported and settled and additional information becomes available in subsequent periods.

In light of the many uncertainties associated with establishing the estimates and making the assumptions necessary to establish reserve levels, CNA reviews its reserve estimates on a regular basis and makes adjustments in the period that the need for such adjustments is determined. These reviews have resulted in CNA’s identification of information and trends that have caused CNA to change its reserves in prior periods and could lead to the

identification of a need for additional material increases or decreases in claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, which could materially affect our results of operations and equity and CNA’s business and insurer financial strength and corporate debt ratings positively or negatively. See the Ratings section of this MD&A for further information regarding CNA’s financial strength and corporate debt ratings.

The following table summarizes gross and net carried reserves for CNA’s property and casualty operations:

 

December 31  2012      2011   2013     2012   

 

 
(In millions)                   

Gross Case Reserves

  $8,771      $8,707          $      8,374            $8,771      

Gross IBNR Reserves

   9,824       9,642                9,350             9,824      

 

 

Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves

  $   18,595      $   18,349          $    17,724            $18,595      

 

 

Net Case Reserves

  $7,811      $7,806          $      7,541            $7,811      

Net IBNR Reserves

   8,786       8,607                8,486             8,786      

 

 

Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves

  $16,597      $16,413          $    16,027            $     16,597      

 

 

The following table summarizes the gross and net carried reserves for certain property and casualty business in run-off, including CNA Re and A&EP:

 

December 31  2012     2011 

 

 
(In millions)          

Gross Case Reserves

  $1,207     $1,321       

Gross IBNR Reserves

   1,955      1,808       

 

 

Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves

  $     3,162     $     3,129       

 

 

Net Case Reserves

  $292     $347       

Net IBNR Reserves

   220      244       

 

 

Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves

  $512     $591       

 

 

December 31  2013     2012   

 

 
(In millions)        

Gross Case Reserves

   $      1,140            $       1,207      

Gross IBNR Reserves

         2,167             1,955      

 

 

Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves

   $      3,307            $3,162      

 

 

Net Case Reserves

   $         283            $292      

Net IBNR Reserves

            184             220      

 

 

Total Net Carried Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves

   $         467            $512      

 

 

Life & Group Non-Core Policyholder Reserves

CNA calculates and maintains reserves for policyholder claims and benefits for Life & Group Non-Core based on actuarial assumptions. The determination of these reserves is fundamental to its financial results and requires management to make assumptions about expected investment and policyholder experience over the life of the contract. Since many of these contracts may be in force for several decades, these assumptions are subject to significant estimation risk.

The actuarial assumptions represent management’s best estimateestimates at the date the contract was issued plus a margin for adverse deviation. Actuarial assumptions include estimates of morbidity, mortality, policy persistency, discount rates and expenses over the life of the contracts. Under GAAP, these assumptions are locked in throughout the life of the contract unless a premium deficiency develops. The impact of differences between the actuarial assumptions and actual experience is reflected in results of operations each period.

Annually, management assesses the adequacy of its GAAP reserves by product group by performing premium deficiency testing. In this test, reserves computed using best estimate assumptions as of the date of the test without provisions for adverse deviation are compared to the recorded reserves. If reserves determined based on management’s current best estimate assumptions are greater than the existing net GAAP reserves (i.e. reserves net of any Deferred acquisition costs asset), the existing net GAAP reserves are adjustedwould be increased to the greater amount. Any such increase would be reflected in CNA’s results of operations in the period in which the need for such adjustment is determined, and could materially adversely affect CNA’s results of operations, equity and business and insurer financial strength and corporate debt ratings.

Payout Annuity Reserves

CNA’s payout annuity reserves consist primarily of single premium group and structured settlement annuities. The annuity payments are generally fixed and are either for a specified period or contingent on the survival of the payee. These reserves are discounted except for reserves for loss adjustment expenses on structured settlements not funded by annuities in its property and casualty insurance companies. In 2012 and 2011, CNA recognized a premium deficiency on its payout annuity reserves. Therefore, the actuarial assumptions established at time of issue have been unlocked and updated to management’s then current best estimate. The actuarial assumptions that management believes are subject to the most variability are discount ratesrate and mortality.

The table below summarizes the estimated pretax impact on CNA’s results of operations from various hypothetical revisions to its assumptions. CNA has assumed that revisions to such assumptions would occur in each policy type, age and duration within each policy group. Although such hypothetical revisions are not currently required or anticipated, CNA believes they could occur based on past variances in experience and its expectations of the ranges of future experience that could reasonably occur.

CNA’s current GAAP payout annuity reserves contain a level of margin in excess of management’s current best estimates. Any required increase in the net GAAP reserves resulting from the hypothetical revisions in the table below would first reduce the margin before they would affect results of operations. The estimated impacts to results of operations in the table below are after consideration of the existing margin.

 

December 31, 20122013  Estimated Reduction
to Pretax Income
 

 

 
(In millions of dollars)    

Hypothetical revisions

  

Discount rate:

  

50 basis point decline

      $131            106          

100 basis point decline

   277            247          

Mortality:

  

5% decline

   25            5          

10% decline

   51            31          

Any actual adjustment would be dependent on the specific policies affected and, therefore, may differ from the estimates summarized above.

Long Term Care Reserves

Long term care policies provide benefits for nursing home, assisted living and home health care subject to various daily and lifetime caps. Policyholders must continue to make periodic premium payments to keep the policy in force. Generally CNA has the ability to increase policy premiums, subject to state regulatory approval.

CNA’s long term care reserves consist of an active life reserve, a liability for due and unpaid claims, claims in the course of settlement and incurred but not reported claims. The active life reserve represents the present value of expected future benefit payments and expenses less expected future premium.

The actuarial assumptions that management believes are subject to the most variability are discount rates,rate, morbidity, and persistency, which can be affected by policy lapses and death. There is limited historical data and industry data available to CNA for these reserves, as only a small portion of the long term care policies which have been written to date are in claims paying status and trends in morbidity and mortality change over time. As a result, CNA’s long term care reserves may be subject to material increase if these trends develop adversely to its expectations.

The table below summarizes the estimated pretax impact on CNA’s results of operations from various hypothetical revisions to its assumptions. CNA has assumed that revisions to such assumptions would occur in each policy type, age and duration within each policy group. Although such hypothetical revisions are not currently

required or anticipated, CNA believes they could occur based on past variances in experience and its expectations of the ranges of future experience that could reasonably occur.

It should be noted that CNA’s current GAAP long term care reserves contain a level of margin in excess of management’s current best estimates. Any required increase in the net GAAP reserves resulting from the hypothetical revisions in the table below would first reduce the margin before they would affect results of operations. The estimated impactimpacts to results of operations in the table below are after consideration of the existing margin.

 

December 31, 20122013  Estimated Reduction
to Pretax Income
 

 

 
(In millions of dollars)    

Hypothetical revisions

  

Discount rate:

  

50 basis point decline

    $491            305              

100 basis point decline

   1,221            1,041              

Morbidity:

  

5% increase

   357            188              

10% increase

   869            724              

Persistency:

  

5% decline in voluntary lapse and mortality

   208            18              

10% decline in voluntary lapse and mortality

   607            418              

Any actual adjustment would be dependent on the specific policies affected and, therefore, may differ from the estimates summarized above.

The following table summarizes the net carried Life & Group Non-Core policyholder reserves:

 

December 31, 2012 Claim and claim
adjustment expenses
       Future
     policy benefits
       Policyholders’
     funds
  Separate    
account business    
 

 

 
(In millions)            

Long term care

   $1,683             $6,879         

Payout annuities

  637              2,008         

Institutional markets

  1              12        $100        $312            

Other

  45              4         

 

 

Total (a)

   $2,366             $8,903        $100        $312            

 

 

December 31, 2011 Claim and claim
adjustment expenses
      Future
     policy benefits
      Policyholders’
     funds
 Separate    
account business    
 
December 31, 2013 Claim and claim
adjustment expenses
 Future
policy benefits
 Policyholders’
funds
 Separate
account business
 Total         

 

 
(In millions)                    

Long term care

   $1,470            $6,374           $1,889       $7,329     $9,218        

Payout annuities

  660             1,997           613        1,990      2,603        

Institutional markets

  1             15        $129       $417              1        9   $57    $181        248        

Other

  53             5           37        4      41        

 

 

Total (a)

   $2,184            $8,391        $129       $417              2,540        9,332    57    181        12,110        

Shadow adjustments (a)

  83        406      489        

Ceded reserves

  435        733    35     1,203        

 

 

Total gross reserves

 $3,058       $10,471   $92   $181       $    13,802        

 

December 31, 2012

           

 

Long term care

 $1,683       $6,879     $8,562        

Payout annuities

  637        2,008      2,645        

Institutional markets

  1        12   $100   $312        425        

Other

  45        4      49        

 

Total

  2,366        8,903    100    312        11,681        

Shadow adjustments (a)

  162        1,812      1,974        

Ceded reserves

  478        760    34     1,272        

 

Total gross reserves

 $3,006       $    11,475   $    134   $312       $     14,927        

 

 

(a)

Reserve amountsTo the extent that unrealized gains on fixed income securities supporting long term care products and payout annuity contracts would result in a premium deficiency if those gains were realized, a related decrease in Deferred acquisition costs and/or increase in Insurance reserves are recorded, net of $1.3 billiontax and $1.4 billionnoncontrolling interests, as a reduction of ceded reserves and exclude $1.8 billion and $627 million of future policy benefits relating tonet unrealized gains through Other comprehensive income (“Shadow Adjustments”). The Shadow Adjustments as of December 31, 2012presented above do not include $342 million and 2011, as further discussed in Note 1 of the Notes$369 million related to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8. ReservesDeferred acquisition costs at December 31, 20122013 and 2011 also exclude $162 million and $95 million of claim and claim adjustment expenses relating to Shadow Adjustments.2012.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes the results of operations for CNA for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 as presented in Note 2122 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

 

Year Ended December 31 2012 2011 2010     2013   2012   2011      

 

 
(In millions)               

Revenues:

       

Insurance premiums

 $    6,882   $    6,603   $    6,515         $7,271       $      6,882     $      6,603         

Net investment income

  2,282    2,054    2,316          2,450    2,282    2,054         

Investment gains (losses)

  60    (19  86          27    60    (19)        

Other

  323    325    291          365    323    325         

 

 

Total

  9,547    8,963    9,208              10,113    9,547    8,963         

 

 

Expenses:

       

Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits

  5,896    5,489    4,985          5,947    5,896    5,489         

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

  1,274    1,176    1,168          1,362    1,274    1,176         

Other operating expenses

  1,327    1,234    1,777          1,318    1,327    1,234         

Interest

  170    185    157          166    170    185         

 

 

Total

  8,667    8,084    8,087          8,793    8,667    8,084         

 

 

Income before income tax

  880    879    1,121          1,320    880    879         

Income tax expense

  (247  (244  (335)        (378  (247  (244)        

 

Income from continuing operations

  633    635    786       

Discontinued operations, net

    (20)     

 

Net income

  633    635    766       

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (63  (78  (129)        (95  (63  (78)        

 

 

Net income attributable to Loews Corporation

 $570   $557   $637         $847       $570     $557         

 

 

2013 Compared with 2012

Net income increased $277 million in 2013 as compared with 2012. Net investment income increased $168 million, primarily driven by a significant increase in limited partnership results. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $33 million ($19 million after tax and noncontrolling interests) in investment gains. See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of net realized investment results and net investment income. Insurance premiums increased $389 million, including an increase of $241 million related to Hardy, which was acquired in July of 2012. Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits increased $51 million, primarily due to the impact of a $111 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) deferred gain under retroactive reinsurance accounting and lower aggregate favorable net prior year development, partially offset by lower catastrophe impacts. Further information on net prior year development for 2013 and 2012 is included in Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

2012 Compared with 2011

Net income increased $13 million in 2012 as compared with 2011. Net investment income increased $228 million, driven by significantly favorable limited partnership results. In addition, investment gains (losses) increased $79 million ($45 million after tax and noncontrolling interests). See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of net realized investment results and net investment income. Insurance premiums also increased $279 million, including the acquisition of Hardy. Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits increased $407 million, primarily due to higher catastrophe impacts, including $171 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) from Storm Sandy, and decreased aggregate favorable net prior year development. Further information on net prior year development for 2012 and 2011 is included in Note 89 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

2011 Compared with 2010

As further discussed in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8, on August, 31, 2010, CNA completed the Loss Portfolio Transfer. We recognized a loss of $328 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) in the third quarter of 2010, of which $309 million related to our continuing operations and $19 million related to our discontinued operations.

Net income decreased $80 million in 2011 as compared with 2010. Excluding the loss associated with the Loss Portfolio Transfer, net income decreased $408 million in 2011 as compared with 2010. Net investment income decreased $262 million, reflecting significant unfavorable limited partnership results. In addition, investment gains (losses) decreased $105 million ($56 million after tax and noncontrolling interests). See the Investments section of this MD&A for further discussion of net realized investment results and net investment income. Partially offsetting these decreases was an $88 million increase in insurance premiums. Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits increased $504 million, primarily due to a lower level of favorable net prior year development, higher catastrophe losses and decreased results in CNA’s payout annuity business. CNA’s payout annuity business was negatively impacted by a $104 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) increase in insurance reserves, due to unlocking actuarial reserve assumptions for anticipated adverse changes in mortality and discount rates, which reflect the current low interest rate environment and CNA’s view of expected investment yields, as discussed in Life & Group Non-Core Policyholder Reserves above. Further information on net prior year development for 2011 and 2010 is included in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

CNA Property and Casualty Insurance Operations

CNA’s property and casualty insurance operations consist of professional, financial, specialty property and casualty products and services and commercial insurance and risk management products.

In evaluating the results of the property and casualty businesses, CNA utilizes the loss ratio, the expense ratio, the dividend ratio and the combined ratio. These ratios are calculated using GAAP financial results. The loss ratio is the percentage of net incurred claim and claim adjustment expenses to net earned premiums. The expense ratio is the percentage of insurance underwriting and acquisition expenses, including the amortization of deferred acquisition costs, to net earned premiums. The dividend ratio is the ratio of policyholders’ dividends incurred to net earned premiums. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss, expense and dividend ratios.

The following table summarizes the results of CNA’s property and casualty operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2013  CNA
Specialty
   CNA
Commercial
   Hardy   Total 

 
(In millions, except %)                

Net written premiums

  $      3,091        $      3,312        $          396        $      6,799          

Net earned premiums

   3,004         3,350         361         6,715          

Net investment income

   657         927         4         1,588          

Net operating income

   635         421         9         1,065          

Net realized investment gains (losses)

   (1)        (8)        1         (8)          

Net income

   634         413         10         1,057          

Ratios:

        

Loss and loss adjustment expense

   56.7%     73.9%     44.8%     64.6%      

Expense

   30.0         34.2         48.6         33.1          

Dividend

   0.2         0.2           0.2          

 

Combined

   86.9%     108.3%     93.4%     97.9%      

 
Year Ended December 31, 2012     CNA
    Specialty
 CNA
Commercial
       Hardy       Total                           

 

 
(In millions, except %)         

Net written premiums

 $2,924   $3,373   $117   $    6,414            $      2,924        $      3,373        $          117        $      6,414          

Net earned premiums

  2,898    3,306    120    6,324             2,898         3,306         120         6,324          

Net investment income

  592    854    3    1,449             592         854         3         1,449          

Net operating income (loss)

  453    250    (21  682             453         250         (21)        682          

Net realized investment gains

  12    23     35             12         23           35          

Net income (loss)

  465    273    (21  717             465         273         (21)        717          

Ratios:

            

Loss and loss adjustment expense

  63.2  77.9  60.3  70.8%        63.2%      77.9%      60.3%      70.8%       

Expense

  31.5    35.3    57.2    34.0             31.5         35.3         57.2         34.0          

Dividend

  0.1    0.3     0.2             0.1         0.3           0.2          

 

 

Combined

  94.8  113.5  117.5  105.0%        94.8%      113.5%      117.5%      105.0%       

 

 
Year Ended December 31, 2011                

 

Net written premiums

  $      2,872        $      3,350          $      6,222          

Net earned premiums

   2,796         3,240           6,036          

Net investment income

   500         763           1,263          

Net operating income

   465         333           798          

Net realized investment gains (losses)

   (3)        10           7          

Net income

   462         343           805          

Ratios:

        

Loss and loss adjustment expense

   59.3%      70.9%        65.5%       

Expense

   30.7         34.6           32.9          

Dividend

   (0.1)        0.3           0.1          

 

Combined

   89.9%      105.8%        98.5%       

 

Year Ended December 31, 2011  

  CNA  

  Specialty  

   CNA
Commercial
   Total         

 

 
(In millions, except %)            

Net written premiums

  $2,872        $3,350        $      6,222          

Net earned premiums

   2,796         3,240         6,036          

Net investment income

   500         763         1,263          

Net operating income

   465         333         798          

Net realized investment gains (losses)

   (3)        10         7          

Net income

   462         343         805          

Ratios:

      

Loss and loss adjustment expense

   59.3%      70.9%      65.5%       

Expense

   30.7         34.6         32.9          

Dividend

   (0.1)        0.3         0.1          

 

 

Combined

   89.9%      105.8%      98.5%       

 

 
Year Ended December 31, 2010            

 

 

Net written premiums

  $2,691        $3,208        $      5,899          

Net earned premiums

   2,679         3,256         5,935          

Net investment income

   591         873         1,464          

Net operating income

   561         464         1,025          

Net realized investment gains (losses)

   18         (14)        4          

Net income

   579         450         1,029          

Ratios:

      

Loss and loss adjustment expense

   54.0%      66.8%      61.0%       

Expense

   30.6         35.4         33.3          

Dividend

   0.5         0.4         0.4          

 

 

Combined

   85.1%      102.6%      94.7%       

 

 

2013 Compared with 2012

Net written premiums increased $385 million in 2013 as compared with 2012, including an increase of $279 million related to Hardy. Excluding Hardy, the increase in net written premiums was primarily driven by increased rate, partially offset by previous underwriting actions taken in certain business classes in CNA Commercial. Net earned premiums increased $391 million in 2013 as compared with 2012, including $241 million related to Hardy. Excluding Hardy, the increase in net earned premiums was consistent with increases in net written premiums.

The CNA Specialty average rate increased 6% in 2013 as compared with an increase of 5% in 2012 for the policies that renewed in each period. Retention of 85% and 86% was achieved in each period. The CNA Commercial average rate increased 8% in 2013 as compared with an increase of 7% in 2012 for the policies that renewed in each period. Retention of 74% and 77% was achieved in each period. Hardy’s average rate decreased 2% in 2013 as compared with an increase of 1% for 2012 for the policies that renewed in each period. Retention of 70% and 68% was achieved in each period.

Net operating income increased $383 million in 2013 as compared to 2012, primarily due to improved underwriting results, higher net investment income and a settlement benefit of $28 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) in 2013 for CNA Commercial. These favorable impacts were partially offset by unfavorable net prior year development in 2013 for CNA Commercial. Catastrophe losses were $100 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) in 2013 as compared to $243 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) in 2012.

The combined ratio improved 7.1 points in 2013 as compared to 2012. The loss ratio improved 6.2 points in 2013 as compared to 2012, primarily due to an improved current accident year non-catastrophe loss ratio and decreased catastrophe losses in CNA Commercial and Hardy. The expense ratio improved by 0.9 points, primarily due to a higher net earned premium base in CNA Specialty and Hardy, the impact of lower underwriting expenses in CNA Specialty and decreased expenses including favorable changes in estimates of insurance assessment liabilities in CNA Commercial.

Favorable net prior year development decreased by $84 million, from $239 million in 2012 to $155 million in 2013. Further information on net prior year development is included in Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

2012 Compared with 2011

Net written premiums increased $192 million in 2012 as compared with 2011. Net written premiums for 2012 included $117 million related to Hardy and for 2011 included $128 million related to First Insurance Company of Hawaii (“FICOH”). Excluding Hardy and FICOH, the increase in net written premiums was primarily driven by positive rate achievement, partially offset by lower new business levels in certain lines in CNA Specialty. Net earned premiums increased $288 million in 2012 as compared with 2011, including $120 million related to Hardy during 2012 and $125 million related to FICOH during 2011. Excluding Hardy and FICOH, the increase in net earned premiums was consistent with increases in net written premiums and the impact of favorable premium development in CNA Commercial in 2012 as compared to unfavorable premium development in 2011.

The CNA Specialty average rate increased 5% in 2012 as compared to flat average rate in 2011 for the policies that renewed in each period. Retention of 86% and 87% was achieved in each period. The CNA Commercial average rate increased 7% in 2012 as compared with an increase of 2% in 2011 for the policies that renewed in each period. Retention of 77% and 78% was achieved in each period.

Net operating income decreased $116 million in 2012 as compared to 2011. The decrease in net operating income was primarily due to lower favorable net prior year development, higher catastrophe losses for CNA Commercial and decreased current accident year underwriting results in CNA Specialty. These unfavorable impacts were partially offset by higher net investment income and the inclusion of the Surety business on a wholly owned basis in 2012 for CNA Specialty. Catastrophe losses were $243 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) in 2012 as compared to $130 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) in 2011.

The combined ratio increased 6.5 points in 2012 as compared to 2011. The loss ratio increased 5.3 points in 2012 as compared to 2011, primarily due to higher catastrophe losses in CNA Commercial, lower favorable net prior year development and a higher current accident year loss ratio. The expense ratio increased by 1.1 points, primarily due to the favorable impact of recoveries in 2011 on insurance receivables written off in prior years in CNA Commercial and increased acquisition and underwriting expenses in CNA Specialty.

Favorable net prior year development decreased by $189 million, from $428 million in 2011 to $239 million in 2012. Further information on net prior year development for 2012 and 2011 is included in Note 89 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

2011 Compared with 2010

Net written premiums increased $323 million in 2011 as compared with 2010, primarily driven by new business, positive rate achievement in CNA Commercial, improved economic conditions reflected in insured exposures, as well as lower reinsurance costs. Net earned premiums increased $101 million in 2011 as compared with 2010, consistent with increases in net written premiums over recent quarters and favorable premium development in CNA Specialty, partially offset by unfavorable premium development in CNA Commercial.

The average rate for CNA Specialty was flat for 2011 as compared to a decrease of 2% in 2010 for the policies that renewed in each period. Retention of 87% and 86% was achieved in each period. The average rate for CNA Commercial increased 2% in 2011 as compared with an increase of 1% in 2010 for the policies that renewed in each period. Retention of 78% and 80% was achieved in each period.

Net operating income decreased $227 million in 2011 as compared to 2010 primarily due to lower net investment income, higher catastrophe losses and lower favorable net prior year development. Catastrophe losses were $130 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) in 2011 as compared to $71 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) in 2010.

The combined ratio increased 3.8 points in 2011 as compared to 2010. The loss ratio increased 4.5 points in 2011 as compared to 2010, primarily due to lower favorable net prior year development and higher catastrophe losses. The expense ratio improved by 0.4 points, primarily due to the favorable impact of recoveries in 2011 on insurance receivables written off in prior years in CNA Commercial.

Favorable net prior year development decreased by $172 million, from $600 million in 2010 to $428 million in 2011. Further information on net prior year development for 2011 and 2010 is included in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

Life & Group Non-Core and Other Operations

Life & Group Non-Core primarily includes the results of the life and group lines of business that are in run-off. Other primarily includes certain CNA corporate expenses, including interest on corporate debt and the results of certain property and casualty business in run-off, including CNA Re and A&EP. In 2010,

On February 10, 2014, CNA ceded substantially allentered into a definitive agreement to sell the majority of its legacy A&EP liabilities underrun-off annuity and pension deposit business. Further information on the Loss Portfolio Transfer, as further discussedsale is included in Note 823 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

The following table summarizes the results of CNA’s Life & Group Non-Core and Other operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2013  Life & Group
Non-Core
   Other   Total 

 
(In millions)            

Net earned premiums

    $     559         $          559         

Net investment income

   830       $            32      862         

Net operating loss

   (52)       (182)     (234)        

Net realized investment gains

   21             24         

Net loss

   (31)       (179)     (210)        
Year Ended December 31, 2012  Life & Group
Non-Core
         Other           Total                    

 

 
(In millions)          

Net earned premiums

  $560           $560             $     560         $560         

Net investment income

   801          $32    833            801       $32      833         

Net loss

   (81)          (66  (147)      ��    (81)       (66)     (147)        
Year Ended December 31, 2011                      

 

 

Net earned premiums

  $569           $569             $     569         $569         

Net investment income

   759          $32    791            759       $32      791         

Net operating loss

   (187)          (44  (231)           (187)       (44)     (231)        

Net realized investment losses

   (4)          (13  (17)           (4)       (13)     (17)        

Net loss

   (191)          (57  (248)           (191)       (57)     (248)        

 
Year Ended December 31, 2010          

 

Net earned premiums

  $582           $582         

Net investment income

   715          $137    852         

Net operating loss

   (81)          (334  (415)        

Net realized investment gains

   30           12    42         

Net loss

   (51)          (322  (373)        

 

2013 Compared with 2012

Net loss increased $63 million in 2013 as compared with 2012, primarily driven by the impact of a $111 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) deferred gain under retroactive reinsurance accounting related to the Loss Portfolio Transfer, as further discussed in Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8. The results were partially offset by $40 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) of expenses in 2012 due to unlocking actuarial reserve assumptions on CNA’s payout annuity business and long term care reserve strengthening. In 2013, payout annuity reserves were determined to be adequate, therefore no unlocking of actuarial assumptions was required.

CNA’s long term care business was positively impacted in 2013 by the effect of rate increase actions. The favorable impact of rate increase actions was more than offset by unfavorable morbidity.

2012 Compared with 2011

Net earned premiums, which relate primarily to the individual and group long term care businesses, decreased $9 million in 2012 as compared with 2011, primarily due to lapsing of policies in CNA’s individual long term care business, which is in run-off, partially offset by increased premiums resulting from rate increase actions related to this business.

Net loss decreased $101 million in 2012 as compared with 2011. The results include expenses of $22 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) in 2012 and $104 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) in 2011 related to CNA’s payout annuity business, due to unlocking actuarial reserve assumptions. The initial reserving assumptions for these contracts were determined at issuance, including a margin for adverse deviation, and were locked in throughout the life of the contract unless a premium deficiency developed. The increase to the related reserves in 2012 related to anticipated adverse changes in discount rates, which reflectreflected the current low interest rate environment and CNA’s view of expected future investment yields. The increase in 2011 related to anticipated adverse changes in mortality and discount rates. Additionally, long term care claim reserves were increased $18 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) in 2012 and $30 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) in 2011.

The decrease in net loss was also driven by improved results in Life & Group Non-Core life settlement contracts business and the impact of unfavorable performance in 2011 on its remaining pension deposit business.

2011 Compared with 2010

Net earned premiums, which relate primarily to the individual and group long term care businesses, decreased $13 million in 2011 as compared with 2010.

Net loss decreased $125 million in 2011 as compared with 2010, primarily driven by the loss of $328 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) as a result of the Loss Portfolio Transfer consummated in the third quarter of 2010. As a result of that transaction, the investment income allocated to Other decreased substantially because of the lower net reserve base and associated risk capital.

These net loss decreases were partially offset by net loss increases in CNA’s payout annuity, pension deposit and long term care businesses. In 2011, CNA’s payout annuity business was negatively impacted by a $104 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) increase in insurance reserves, as discussed above. In 2010, CNA’s payout annuity reserves were increased by $35 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests), resulting from unlocking assumptions. Additionally, long term care claim reserves were increased by $30 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) in 2011.

A number of CNA’s separate account pension deposit contracts guarantee principal and an annual minimum rate of interest. If aggregate contract value in the separate account exceeds the fair value of the related assets, an additional Policyholders’ funds liability is established. In 2011, CNA increased this pretax liability by $18 million. In 2010, CNA decreased this pretax liability by $24 million.

Diamond Offshore

Diamond Offshore’s operatingpretax income is primarily a function of contract drilling revenue earned less contract drilling expenses incurred or recognized. The two most significant variables affecting Diamond Offshore’s revenues are dayrates for rigs and rig utilization rates, each of which is a function of rig supply and demand in the marketplace. These factors are not within Diamond Offshore’s control and are difficult to predict. Revenue from dayrate drilling contracts are generally recognized as services are performed, consequently, when a rig is idle, no dayrate is earned and revenue will decrease as a result. Revenues can also be affected as a result of the acquisition or disposal of rigs, rig mobilizations, required surveys and shipyard projects. In connection with certain drilling contracts, Diamond Offshore may receive fees for the mobilization of equipment. In addition, some of Diamond Offshore’s drilling contracts require downtime before the start of the contract to prepare the rig to meet customer requirements for which it may be compensated.

Diamond Offshore’s operatingpretax income is also a function of varying levels of operating expenses. Operating expenses generally are not affected by changes in dayrates, and short term reductions in utilization do not necessarily result in lower operating expenses. For instance, if a rig is to be idle for a short period of time, few decreases in operating expenses may actually occur since the rig is typically maintained in a prepared or “warm stacked” state with a full crew. In addition, when a rig is idle, Diamond Offshore is responsible for certain operating expenses such as rig fuel and supply boat costs, which are typically costs of the operator when a rig is under contract. However, if the rig is to be idle for an extended period of time, Diamond Offshore may reduce the size of a rig’s crew and take steps to “cold stack” the rig, which lowers expenses and partially offsets the impact on operatingpretax income.

Operating expenses represent all direct and indirect costs associated with the operation and maintenance of Diamond Offshore’s drilling equipment. The principal components of Diamond Offshore’s operating costs are, among other things, direct and indirect costs of labor and benefits, repairs and maintenance, freight, regulatory inspections, boat and helicopter rentals and insurance. Labor and repair and maintenance costs represent the most significant components of Diamond Offshore’s operating expenses. In general, labor costs increase primarily due to higher salary levels, rig staffing requirements and costs associated with labor regulations in the geographic regions in which Diamond Offshore’s rigs operate. In addition, the costs associated with training new and seasoned employees can be significant. Diamond Offshore expects its labor and training costs to increase in 20132014 as a result of increased hiring and training activities as it continues the process of crewing its four new drillships.remaining drillships and semisubmersible rigs under construction. Costs to repair and maintain equipment fluctuate depending upon the type

of activity the drilling rig is performing, as well as the age and condition of the equipment and the regions in which Diamond Offshore’s rigs are working.

OperatingPretax income is negatively impacted when Diamond Offshore performs certain regulatory inspections, which it refers to as a 5-year survey, or special survey, that are due every five years for each of Diamond Offshore’s rigs. Operating revenue decreases because these special surveys are generally performed during scheduled downtime in a shipyard. Operating expenses increase as a result of these special surveys due to the cost to mobilize the rigs to a shipyard, inspection costs incurred and repair and maintenance costs which are recognized as incurred. Repair and maintenance activities may result from the special survey or may have been previously planned to take place during this mandatory downtime. The number of rigs undergoing a 5-year survey will vary from year to year, as well as from quarter to quarter.

In addition, operatingpretax income may also be negatively impacted by intermediate surveys, which are performed at interim periods between 5-year surveys. Intermediate surveys are generally less extensive in duration and scope than a 5-year survey. Although an intermediate survey may require some downtime for the drilling rig, it normally does not require dry-docking or shipyard time, except for rigs located in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) and Norwegian sectors of the North Sea.

As a result of anticipated downtime in the current year for rig mobilizations, regulatory surveys and shipyard projects, Diamond Offshore expects contract drilling revenue in 2013 to decline from the levels attained in 2012. During 2013, 112014, six of Diamond Offshore’s rigs will require 5-year surveys and one of its U.K.another three rigs will require dry-docking for inspections.complete surveys that commenced in 2013. These 12nine rigs willare expected to be out of service for approximately 830380 days in the aggregate. Diamond Offshore also expects to spend an additional approximately 590670 days during 20132014 for intermediate surveys, the mobilization of rigs, contract acceptance testing and extended maintenance projects, including contract preparation work for theOcean Endeavor(approximately 162 days) and North Sea enhancements for theOcean Patriot, each of which (approximately 165 days). The service-life-extension project for theOcean Confidenceis expected to require approximately 180 dayscommence late in the first quarter of downtime.2014, and the rig will be out of service for the balance of the year (approximately 290 days). Diamond Offshore can provide no assurance as to the exact timing and/or duration of downtime associated with regulatory inspections, planned rig mobilizations and other shipyard projects.

Diamond Offshore is self-insured for physical damage to rigs and equipment caused by named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. If a named windstorm in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico causes significant damage to Diamond Offshore’s rigs or equipment, it could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Under its insurance policy that expires on May 1, 2013,2014, Diamond Offshore carries physical damage insurance for certain losses other than those caused by named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico for which its deductible for physical damage is $25 million per occurrence. Diamond Offshore does not typically retain loss-of-hire insurance policies to cover its rigs.

In addition, under its current insurance policy, Diamond Offshore carries marine liability insurance covering certain legal liabilities, including coverage for certain personal injury claims, with no exclusions for pollution and/or environmental risk. Diamond Offshore believes that the policy limit for its marine liability insurance is within the range that is customary for companies of its size in the offshore drilling industry and is appropriate for Diamond Offshore’s business. Diamond Offshore’s deductibles for marine liability coverage, including for personal injury claims, are $10 million for the first occurrence and vary in amounts ranging between $5 million and, if aggregate claims exceed certain thresholds, up to $100 million for each subsequent occurrence, depending on the nature, severity and frequency of claims which might arise during the policy year.

Recent Developments

Internationally,The ultra-deepwater market has weakened, with an increasing number of rigs competing for fewer available jobs, resulting in a downward trend in recent contract dayrate fixtures and shorter term contracts executed. The most active ultra-deepwater floater markets remain primarily within the offshore basins of West Africa, Brazil and the Gulf of Mexico. However, there has been limited tendering activity thus far in 2014 and the outlook is uncertain for the remainder of 2014. If this trend continues, ultra-deepwater floaters could experience lower utilization, or idle time, and realize lower margins. Many industry analysts predict that there will be an oversupply of floaters in the ultra-deepwater market by the end of 2014.

The market for deepwater floaters has also weakened and deepwater floater marketsis characterized by intermittent demand, and multiple existing rigs face pockets of idle time throughout 2014 while newbuilds may have challenges securing work. Dayrate fixtures are generally strong and continue to show signs of further strengthening, particularly for ultra-deepwater rigs where there are reportedly few, if any, uncontracted rigs available to work in 2013, inclusive of the expected 2013 newbuild deliveries, with the market expected to remain strong throughout 2013. Diamond Offshore believes that the diminished availability of rigs in this market could continue to put upward pressure on dayrates during 2013. However, due to its contracted backlog in 2013 (100% and 92% for its ultra-deepwater and deepwater fleets), Diamond Offshore has limited availabilityalso moderating in this market and mayare projected by industry analysts to continue softening in 2014. This market has also seen limited tendering activity in 2014 with an uncertain outlook for the balance of the year.

Strength in the mid-water market also varies significantly by region. In both the U.K. and Norwegian sectors of the North Sea, the mid-water market is showing some signs of weakening, in the form of moderating or decreasing dayrates in part due to an increase in the availability of sublet opportunities being offered for some term contracted rigs. Increasing operator interest in frontier markets across Southeast Asia and South America, including Myanmar, Peru, Nicaragua, Trinidad and Tobago, and Colombia, indicates possible future strengthening in those regions, although opportunities in these areas are not be ableexpected to benefit from higher price fixtures during that period. Newbuildemerge quickly. In the Gulf of Mexico, demand for mid-water rigs is limited, while in Brazil, demand has moderated.

Since 2010, there have been a significant number of orders for newbuild ultra-deepwater and deepwater floaters continuedby established drilling contractors as well as new entrants to be placed in 2012, including Diamond Offshore’s order for a fourth drillship and a semisubmersible rig, both of which are currently under construction. Based on recent analyst data,the industry. Currently, there are 67approximately 100 newbuild floater rigs primarily ultra-deepwater and deepwater units, on order or under construction, excludingthat have been announced, including an estimated 2928 rigs potentially to be built on behalf of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A., (“Petrobras”), which is currently Diamond Offshore’s most significant customer. Excluding Petrobras’ orderedthese customer-ordered rigs, nearly 73%31 of the floaters57 newbuilds scheduled for delivery in 2014 and beyondthrough 2015 are not yet contracted for future work, including two of Diamond Offshore’s drillshipsfour rigs expected to be delivered in 2014 and one2015. The offshore drilling industry has been challenged by the addition of its semisubmersible rigs under construction. In addition, Petrobras has recently announced that it plans to cap the number of its contracted deepwater rigs beginning in 2016. According to industry analysts, they believe Petrobras intends to fill the majority of its deepwater requirement with its ownthese newbuild rigs, which are not yet under construction but which are scheduled for delivery in 2015 and beyond, although industry analysts believe that this timing may be delayed due to current Brazilian shipyard limitations. If imposed by Petrobras, this limit on the

number of contracted rigs could lead to additional availability andhas increased competition in the deepwater market in the future.

Market demand for mid-water floaters is generally stable and is also strengthening in certain geographic markets. In both the U.K. and Norway sectors of the North Sea, the mid-water market is very strong with industry analysts predicting the next availability of rigs in late 2013. A 2012 discovery offshore Norway has resulted in increased interest indownward pressure on dayrates. The influx of newbuilds into the harsh North Sea region, where there is a limited number ofmarket, combined with established rigs capable of working and the barriers to entry are high, primarily due to significant rig modifications necessary to operate in the region. In February of 2013, Diamond Offshore announced its plan to upgrade one of its mid-water floaters for North Sea operations, with a minimum three-year contract for the upgraded rig in the U.K. sector of the North Sea beginning in 2014. In the Mediterranean region, demand remains solid, including the Black Sea region where recent gas discoveries have led to increased interest in the region. The Southeast Asia and Australia markets also remain steady with indications of possible strengthening.

Four of Diamond Offshore’s marketed jack-up rigs are currently operating in the Mexican waters of the Gulf of Mexico, where drilling activity remains stable and additional tendering activity is ongoing. Diamond Offshore’s other international jack-up commenced a two year bareboat charter offshore Ecuador in 2012. During 2012, Diamond Offshore sold six jack-up rigs, resulting in a pretax gain of approximately $76 million.

Drilling activity on the Outer Continental Shelf of the GOM has continued to strengthen and has surpassed pre-Macondo levels. Additionally, some industry analysts predict that drilling activity, particularly in the ultra-deepwater market, will continue to strengthen in 2013 and beyond. However, Diamond Offshore’s ability to meet this demand is limited in the near term. Diamond Offshore currently has two semisubmersible rigs oncoming off contract in the GOM, one of which2014 and 2015, is expected to have limited availabilitycontinue to weaken the ultra-deepwater and deepwater floater markets.

The offshore drilling industry continues to be challenged by growing regulatory demands and more complex customer specifications, which could disadvantage some lower specification rigs. Additionally, customer focus on completing existing projects, possible reduction or deferral of new investment, reallocation of budgets away from offshore projects and particular customer requirements in certain markets could displace, or reduce demand and result in the second halfmigration of 2013. It also has onesome ultra-deepwater rigs to work in deepwater, and likewise, some deepwater rigs to compete against mid-water floaterrigs. Various rigs across all segments could experience lower utilization or idle time and one jack-up rig there available for contract. Looking forward, Diamond Offshore’s two ultra-deepwater drillships as well as one semisubmersible rig under construction which are scheduled for delivery in 2014, none of which have been contracted andlower specification rigs could be positioned in this market. TheOcean Onyx which is currently under construction, is expected to commence a one-year contract plus potential option periods in the GOM during the third quarter of 2013.cold stacked or scrapped.

Contract Drilling Backlog

The following table reflects Diamond Offshore’s contract drilling backlog as of February 1,5, 2014, October 23, 2013 October 17, 2012 (the date reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012)2013) and February 1, 20122013 (the date reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011)2012). Contract drilling backlog as presented below includes only firm commitments (typically represented by signed contracts) and is calculated by multiplying the contracted operating dayrate by the firm contract period and adding one-half of any potential rig performance bonuses. Diamond Offshore’s calculation also assumes full utilization of its drilling equipment for the contract period (excluding scheduled shipyard and survey days); however, the amount of actual revenue earned and the actual periods during which revenues are earned will be different than the amounts and periods shown in the tables below due to various factors. Utilization rates, which generally approach 92% – 98% during contracted periods, can be adversely impacted by downtime due to various operating factors including, but not limited to, weather conditions and unscheduled repairs and maintenance. Contract drilling backlog excludes revenues for mobilization, demobilization, contract preparation and customer reimbursables. No revenue is generally earned during periods of downtime for regulatory surveys. Changes in Diamond Offshore’s contract drilling backlog between periods are a function of the performance of work on term contracts, as well as the extension or modification of existing term contracts and the execution of additional contracts.

  February 1,
2013
   October 17,
2012
   February 1,     
2012     
   February 5,
2014
   October 23,
2013
   February 1,    
2013    
 

 

 
(In millions)                        

Floaters:

            

Ultra-Deepwater (a)

  $4,422       $4,660       $4,926           $    4,111       $    4,306       $     4,422         

Deepwater (b)

   1,229        1,373        1,081           794        862        1,229         

Mid-Water (c)

   2,649        2,510        2,348           1,744        1,997        2,649         

 

 

Total Floaters

   8,300        8,543        8,355           6,649        7,165        8,300         

Jack-ups

   272        203        277           180        188        272         

 

 

Total

  $8,572       $8,746       $8,632           $6,829       $7,353       $8,572         

 

 

 

(a)

As of February 1, 2013,5, 2014, for ultra-deepwater floaters includes (i) $1.3 billion attributable to contracted operations offshore Brazil for the years 2013 to 2015 and (ii) $1.8 billion attributable to future work for two drillships under construction for the years 2013 to 2019.

(b)

As of February 1, 2013, for deepwater floaters includes (i) $563$823 million attributable to contracted operations offshore Brazil for the years 2013 to 20162014 and 2015, (ii) $179 million for the years 2013 to 2014$1.8 billion attributable to future work for theOcean Onyx,two newbuild drillships, one of which is under construction.construction, for the years 2014 to 2019 and (iii) $641 million attributable to future work for the ultra-deepwater semisubmersible rig under construction for the years 2016 to 2019.

(c)(b)

As of February 1, 2013,5, 2014, for mid-waterdeepwater floaters includes $880(i) $308 million attributable to contracted operations offshore Brazil for the years 20132014 to 2016 and (ii) $36 million for the years 2014 and 2015 attributable to future work for theOcean Apex, which is under construction.

(c)

As of February 5, 2014, for mid-water floaters includes $421 million attributable to contracted operations offshore Brazil for the years 2014 and 2015.

The following table reflects the amount of Diamond Offshore’s contract drilling backlog by year as of February 1, 2013:5, 2014:

 

Year Ended December 31  Total   2013   2014   2015   2016 – 2019     Total   2014   2015   2016   2017 – 2019   

 

 
(In millions)                                        

Floaters:

                    

Ultra-Deepwater (a)

  $4,422    $979    $1,223    $996        $1,224        $4,111    $971    $1,198      $499      $1,443      

Deepwater (b)

   1,229     569     456     142     62         794     516     216     62    

Mid-Water (c)

   2,649     1,106     955     408     180         1,744     999     471     159     115      

 

 

Total Floaters

   8,300     2,654     2,634     1,546     1,466         6,649     2,486     1,885     720     1,558      

Jack-ups

   272     140     72     48     12         180     110     48     22    

 

 

Total

  $    8,572    $    2,794    $    2,706    $    1,594        $1,478        $     6,829    $    2,596    $    1,933      $      742      $1,558      

 

 

 

(a)

As of February 1, 2013,5, 2014, for ultra-deepwater floaters includes (i) $524 million, $473$499 million and $324 million for the years 20132014 and 2015, attributable to 2015,contracted operations offshore Brazil, (ii) $174 million, $361 million and $362 million for the years 2014 to 2016, and $909 million in the aggregate for the years 2017 to 2019, attributable to future work for two newbuild drillships, one of which is under construction and (iii) $107 million for the year 2016 and $534 million in the aggregate for the years 2017 to 2019 attributable to future work for the ultra-deepwater semisubmersible rig under construction.

(b)

As of February 5, 2014, for deepwater floaters includes (i) $112 million, $134 million and $62 million for the years 2014 to 2016, attributable to contracted operations offshore Brazil and (ii) $29 million $299 million and $361$7 million for the years 2013 to2014 and 2015 and $1.1 billion in the aggregate for the years 2016 to 2019, attributable to future work for two drillships under construction.

(b)

As of February 1, 2013, for deepwater floaters includes (i) $218 million, $149 million, $134 million and $62 million for the years 2013 to 2016, attributable to contracted operations offshore Brazil and (ii) $45 million and $134 million for the years 2013 and 2014, attributable to future work for theOcean OnyxApex,, which is under construction.

(c)

As of February 1, 2013,5, 2014, for mid-water floaters includes $456 million, $342 million and $82$79 million for the years 2013 to2014 and 2015, attributable to contracted operations offshore Brazil.

The following table reflects the percentage of rig days committed by year as of February 1, 2013.5, 2014. The percentage of rig days committed is calculated as the ratio of total days committed under contracts, as well as scheduled shipyard, survey and mobilization days for all rigs in Diamond Offshore’s fleet, to total available days (number of rigs multiplied by the number of days in a particular year). Total available days have been calculated based on the expected final commissioning dates for rigs under construction.

 

Year Ended December 31  2013 (a)     2014 (a)     2015 (a)     2016 - 2019     2014 (a)    2015 (a)    2016 (a)    2017 – 2019  

 

 

Floaters:

                

Ultra-Deepwater

   100%     86%     57%     14%         87%     62%     26%     19%     

Deepwater

   92%     44%     15%     2%         58%     21%     7%    

Mid-Water

   72%     50%     18%     2%         59%     26%     6%     1%     

Total Floaters

   83%     60%     30%     6%         67%     37%     13%     7%     

Jack-ups

   69%     39%     20%     1%         53%     20%     9%    

 

(a)

As of February 1, 2013,5, 2014, includes approximately 1,540, 6601,570, 270 and 140215 currently known, scheduled shipyard surveydays for rig commissioning, contract preparation, surveys and extended maintenance projects, as well as rig mobilization days for 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2015.2016.

Dayrate and Utilization Statistics

 

Year Ended December 31    2012           2011         2010       2013     2012     2011     

 

 

Revenue earning days (a)

                        

Floaters:

                        

Ultra-Deepwater

   2,475         2,387         1,873          2,392         2,475         2,387         

Deepwater

   1,605         1,718         1,342          1,530         1,605         1,718         

Mid-Water

   4,639         5,254         5,800          4,186         4,639         5,254         

Jack-ups (b)

   1,753         2,218         3,028          1,949         1,753         2,218         

Utilization (c)

                        

Floaters:

                        

Ultra-Deepwater

   85%         82%         66%          82%         85%         82%         

Deepwater

   88%         94%         74%          84%         88%         94%         

Mid-Water

   68%         72%         79%          64%         68%         72%         

Jack-ups (d)

   53%         47%         61%          76%         53%         47%         

Average daily revenue (e)

                        

Floaters:

                        

Ultra-Deepwater

  $  354,900        $  342,900        $  358,400         $ 344,200        $ 354,900        $ 342,900         

Deepwater

   368,800         416,500         401,900          403,100         368,800         416,500         

Mid-Water

   263,600         269,600         281,000          275,700         263,600         269,600         

Jack-ups

   90,200         81,900         87,700          88,600         90,200         81,900         

 

(a)

A revenue earning day is defined as a 24-hour period during which a rig earns a dayrate after commencement of operations and excludes mobilization, demobilization and contract preparation days.

(b)

Revenue earning days for the years ended December 31, 2012 2011 and 20102011 included approximately 87 days 720 days and 1,167720 days, earned by Diamond Offshore’s jack-up rigs during the respective periods prior to being sold in 2012 and 2010.2012.

(c)

Utilization is calculated as the ratio of total revenue earningsearning days divided by the total calendar days in the period for all rigs in Diamond Offshore’s fleet (including cold stacked rigs).

(d)

Utilization for Diamond Offshore’s jack-up rigs would have been 87%, and 59% and 73% for the years ended December 31, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, excluding revenue earning days and total calendar days associated with rigs that were sold in 2012 and 2010.2012.

(e)

Average daily revenue is defined as contract drilling revenue (excluding revenue for mobilization, demobilization and contract preparation) per revenue earning day.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes the results of operations for Diamond Offshore for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 as presented in Note 2122 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012   2011   2010         2013   2012   2011     

 

 
(In millions)                        

Revenues:

              

Contract drilling revenues

  $      2,936     $      3,254     $3,230         $    2,844     $    2,936     $    3,254       

Net investment income

   5      7      3                    7       

Investment gains

      1            1       

Other

   131      73      128          81      131      73       

 

 

Total

   3,072      3,335      3,361          2,926      3,072      3,335       

 

 

Expenses:

              

Contract drilling expenses

   1,537      1,549      1,391          1,573      1,537      1,549       

Other operating expenses

   572      535      546          554      572      535       

Interest

   46      73      91          25      46      73       

 

 

Total

   2,155      2,157      2,028          2,152      2,155      2,157       

 

 

Income before income tax

   917      1,178      1,333          774      917      1,178       

Income tax expense

   (223    (250    (413)         (245)     (223)     (250)      

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (357    (477    (474)         (272)     (357)     (477)      

 

 

Net income attributable to Loews Corporation

  $337     $451     $446         $257     $337     $451       

 

 

2013 Compared with 2012

Contract drilling revenue decreased $92 million in 2013 as compared with 2012, while contract drilling expense increased $36 million during the same period. Contract drilling revenue was negatively impacted by a decrease in revenue earned by Diamond Offshore’s ultra-deepwater and mid-water fleets, partially offset by favorable revenue variances for its deepwater and jack-up rigs. The increase in contract drilling expense reflects higher labor and personnel related costs primarily as a result of mid-2013 pay increases and costs associated with additional crews for Diamond Offshore’s new rigs expected to be delivered in 2014 and for theOcean Onyx delivered in the fourth quarter of 2013, higher repairs and maintenance and inspection costs, partially offset by decreased mobilization and freight costs.

Revenue generated by ultra-deepwater floaters decreased $48 million in 2013 as compared with 2012, due to lower average daily revenue of $25 million, a decrease in amortized mobilization revenue of $18 million and decreased utilization of $30 million, partially offset by $25 million of revenue recognized in connection with a settlement agreement entered into with a customer. The settlement agreement related to amounts due to Diamond Offshore during 2013 for which revenue of $56 million was not recognized due to the financial condition of the customer. The decrease in average daily revenue is primarily due to a contract extension for theOcean Roverat a significantly lower dayrate than previously earned. Amortized mobilization fees decreased primarily due to the recognition of mobilization revenue in the 2012 period associated with theOcean Monarch’s mobilization to Vietnam. The decrease in revenue earning days is primarily due to incremental unplanned downtime, partially offset by a reduction in downtime for shipyard projects and inspection.

Revenue generated by deepwater floaters increased $19 million in 2013 as compared with 2012, as a result of higher average daily revenue of $52 million, partially offset by a decrease in utilization of $28 million and lower amortized mobilization revenue of $5 million. Average daily revenue increased in 2013 primarily due to theOcean Valiant andOcean Victory both working at significantly higher dayrates than those rigs earned in 2012. The decline in revenue earning days is due to incremental unscheduled downtime for repairs, scheduled shipyard projects and mobilization of the Ocean America.

Revenue generated by mid-water floaters decreased $77 million in 2013 as compared with 2012, as a result of decreased utilization of $119 million and a reduction in amortized mobilization and contract preparation fees of $8 million, partially offset by higher average daily revenue of $50 million. Revenue earning days decreased primarily due to an increase in planned downtime for shipyard inspections and projects, cold-stacking of a rig, and 136 fewer days for theOcean Quest andOcean Lexington for which the associated revenue of $61 million was not recognized due to the financial condition of two of Diamond Offshore’s customers and since collection of the amounts due was not reasonably assured, partially offset by fewer days for the mobilization of rigs. The increase in average daily revenue is primarily due to new contracts and contract renewals for four rigs at higher dayrates than previously earned.

Revenue generated by jack-up rigs increased $14 million in 2013 as compared with 2012, primarily due to utilization of a rig which was warm stacked in 2012 earning $26 million of revenue in 2013, partially offset by the absence of revenue attributable to six jack-up rigs that Diamond Offshore sold in 2012. These rigs earned aggregate revenue of $5 million in 2012. Revenues in 2013 were further reduced by scheduled downtime for repairs for two jack-up rigs.

Net income decreased $80 million in 2013 as compared with 2012 reflecting the decline in revenue, increase in contract drilling expense and recognition of bad debt expense of $23 million, partially offset by lower interest expense. The decrease in interest expense is primarily due to an increase in interest capitalized on eligible construction projects in 2013, partially offset by incremental interest expense for the senior unsecured notes issued in 2013 and interest expense associated with uncertain tax positions in the Mexico tax jurisdiction. Net income for 2012 also included a $32 million gain (after tax and noncontrolling interests) on the sale of six jack-up rigs and an impairment loss of $19 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) recognized on three mid-water floaters.

Diamond Offshore’s effective tax rate for 2013 increased as compared with 2012. The higher effective tax rate in 2013 is primarily the result of differences in the mix of Diamond Offshore’s domestic and international pretax earnings and losses, as well as the international jurisdictions in which Diamond Offshore operates and a $57 million ($27 million after noncontrolling interests) charge related to an uncertain tax position for Egyptian operations. The increase in the effective rate is partially offset by the recognition of the impact of The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which reduced 2013 income tax expense by $28 million ($13 million after noncontrolling interests). The Act, which was signed into law on January 2, 2013, extended through 2013 several expired temporary business provisions, commonly referred to as “extenders” which were retroactively extended to the beginning of 2012.

As Diamond Offshore’s rigs frequently operate in different tax jurisdictions as they move from contract to contract, its effective tax rate can fluctuate substantially and its historical effective tax rates may not be sustainable and could increase materially.

2012 Compared with 2011

Contract drilling revenue decreased $318 million and net income decreased $114 million in 2012 as compared with 2011. Contract drilling revenue for 2012 was negatively impacted by a decrease in both revenue earning days and average daily revenue earned by Diamond Offshore’s deepwater and mid-water floaters, partially offset by favorable revenue variances for its ultra-deepwater floaters. Contract drilling expense decreased $12 million primarily due to a decrease in expense for mid-water floaters and jack-ups due to the movement of certain rigs to other operating regions with lower cost structures, lower repair and inspection costs, as well as the absence of operating costs in 2012 for the recently sold jack-up rigs. The decrease in contract drilling expense was partially offset by an increase in costs associated with ultra-deepwater and deepwater floaters, primarily due to higher personnel related, inspection and shorebase support costs in 2012.

Revenue generated by ultra-deepwater floaters increased $61 million in 2012 as compared with 2011, primarily due to increased average daily revenue of $30 million and increased utilization of $30 million due to higher revenue earning days. The increase in average daily revenue iswas primarily due to higher dayrates earned by theOcean Monarch operating internationally during 2012 compared with the rig operating in the GOM in 2011. The increase in revenue earning days iswas primarily due to downtime associated with theOcean Monarch in 2011, partially offset by a decrease in revenue earning days in 2012 for other ultra-deepwater rigs as a result of scheduled surveys and shipyard projects as well as unscheduled downtime for repairs in 2012.

Revenue generated by deepwater floaters decreased $135 million in 2012 as compared with 2011, primarily due to a $76 million decrease in average daily revenue, a $47 million decrease in utilization as a result of fewer revenue earning days and a $12 million decrease in amortized mobilization fees. The decline in average daily revenue during 2012 iswas primarily due to the completion of theOcean Valiant’s contract in Angola in December of 2011 which was at a significantly higher dayrate than the rig earned during 2012. The decrease in utilization during 2012 iswas primarily due to higher incremental downtime for shipyard projects and inspections as compared with 2011.

Revenue generated by mid-water floaters decreased $207 million in 2012 as compared with 2011, primarily due to a $166 million decrease in utilization, a $28 million decrease in average daily revenue and a $13 million decrease in amortized mobilization fees. Revenue earning days decreased by 615, primarily attributable to planned downtime

for mobilization and shipyard projects, unplanned downtime for repairs, the warm stacking of rigs between contracts and additional days a rig was cold-stacked.

Revenue generated by jack-up rigs decreased $37 million in 2012 as compared with 2011, primarily due to the sale of six jack-up rigs in 2012, three of which operated during 2011.

Net income decreased in 2012 as compared with 2011 reflecting a decline in revenue and a $19 million impairment loss (after tax and noncontrolling interests) on three mid-water floaters which arewere expected to be disposed of in 2013. Net income for 2012 included a $32 million gain (after tax and noncontrolling interests) on the sale of six jack-up rigs. In addition, interest expense decreased $27 million in 2012 as compared with 2011 primarily due to incremental interest costs capitalized during 2012 related to the continuing rig construction projects.

Diamond Offshore’s annual effective tax rate for 2012 increased as compared with 2011. The higher effective tax rate in 2012 iswas primarily the result of differences in the mix of Diamond Offshore’s domestic and international pre-taxpretax earnings and losses, the mix of international tax jurisdictions in which Diamond Offshore operates and the impact of a tax law provision that expired at the end of 2011. This provision allowed Diamond Offshore to defer recognition of certain foreign earnings for U.S. tax purposes during 2011, which deferral was unavailable in 2012. Diamond Offshore’s 2011 tax expense also included the reversal of $15 million of U.S. income tax expense, originally recognized in 2010, related to Diamond Offshore’s intention at that time to repatriate certain foreign earnings which changed in 2011 subsequent to its decision to build new drillships overseas.

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, or the Act, was signed into law on January 2, 2013. The Act extends through 2013 several expired or expiring temporary business provisions which are retroactively extended to the beginning of 2012. One of the extenders will again allow Diamond Offshore to defer recognition of certain foreign earnings for U.S. tax purposes. As required by GAAP, the effects of new legislation are recognized when signed into law. Consequently, Diamond Offshore expects to reduce its first quarter 2013 tax expense by approximately $28 million as a result of recognizing the 2012 effect of the extenders.

As Diamond Offshore’s rigs frequently operate in different tax jurisdictions as they move from contract to contract, its effective tax rate can fluctuate substantially and its historical effective tax rates may not be sustainable and could increase materially.

2011 Compared with 2010

Contract drilling revenue increased $24 million and net income increased $5 million in 2011 as compared with 2010. Revenue generated by Diamond Offshore’s floater rigs increased an aggregate $95 million in 2011 as compared with 2010, while revenue generated by its jack-up fleet declined $71 million. Except for Diamond Offshore’s deepwater floaters, average daily revenue earned by its other rigs decreased during 2011 compared to the levels attained in 2010. Utilization for ultra-deepwater and deepwater floaters increased significantly in 2011 as compared with 2010; however, utilization for mid-water floater and jack-up fleets decreased in 2011. One additional mid-water floater and one jack-up rig were cold stacked during 2011. TheOcean Courage andOcean Valor, which began operating under contract late in the first quarter and in the fourth quarter of 2010, contributed incremental revenue of $162 million during 2011. Total contract drilling expense increased $158 million during 2011 as compared with 2010, reflecting incremental contract drilling expense for theOcean Courage andOcean Valor, higher amortized mobilization costs and higher other operating costs associated with rigs operating internationally rather than domestically.

Revenue from ultra-deepwater floaters increased $123 million in 2011 as compared with 2010, primarily due to increased utilization of $184 million, partially offset by a decrease in average daily revenue of $36 million and the receipt of a $31 million contract termination fee in 2010. Revenue earning days increased primarily due to the two new ultra-deepwater floaters which were under contract in Brazil for all of 2011 generating $162 million in incremental revenue. However, aggregate revenue earned by Diamond Offshore’s six other ultra-deepwater rigs decreased $39 million due to a lower average daily revenue earned, partially offset by an increase in revenue earning days due to downtime in 2010 associated with the relocation of three rigs from the GOM to international locations.

Revenue from deepwater floaters increased $169 million in 2011 as compared with 2010. This increase was primarily due to a $152 million increase in utilization and a $25 million increase in average daily revenue, partially offset by an $8 million decrease in amortized mobilization fees. Revenue earning days increased in 2011, primarily due to fewer non-operating days for repairs, inspections and contract preparation activities as compared to 2010.

Revenue from mid-water floaters decreased $197 million in 2011 as compared with 2010, primarily due to decreased utilization of $153 million, decreased average daily revenue of $59 million and decreased amortized mobilization fees of $9 million, partially offset by a $24 million demobilization fee received in relation to theOcean Yorktown’s completion of its contract offshore Brazil. Revenue earning days decreased by 546, primarily attributable to additional cold stacked days in 2011 compared to 2010, partially offset by less warm stacked days between contracts.

Revenue from jack-up rigs decreased $71 million in 2011 as compared with 2010, primarily due to decreased utilization of $71 million and decreased average daily revenue of $13 million, partially offset by a $13 million increase in amortized mobilization fees. Revenue earning days decreased by 810, reflecting the impact of cold stacking rigs during the period, the sale of theOcean Shield in July 2010 and an increase in warm stacked days in between contracts, partially offset by a decrease in the number of non-revenue earning days for repairs and mobilization of rigs.

Net income increased in 2011 as compared with 2010, primarily due to the changes in contract drilling revenue and expense discussed above. In addition, interest expense decreased $18 million, primarily due to interest capitalized in 2011 on Diamond Offshore’s three drillships under construction at that time. In 2010, Diamond Offshore recognized a pretax gain of $33 million related to the sale of theOcean Shield.

Diamond Offshore’s annual effective tax rate decreased in 2011 as compared with 2010. The lower effective tax rate in the current year is primarily the result of differences in the mix of Diamond Offshore’s domestic and international pretax earnings and losses, as well as the mix of international tax jurisdictions in which Diamond Offshore operates. Also contributing to the lower effective tax rate in 2011 was the impact of a tax law provision that expired at the end of 2009 but was subsequently signed back into law in December 2010. This provision allowed Diamond Offshore to defer recognition of certain foreign earnings for U.S. income tax purposes. The extension of this tax law provision, and Diamond Offshore’s decisions to build three new drillships overseas caused Diamond Offshore to reassess its intent to repatriate certain foreign earnings to the U.S. It is now Diamond Offshore’s intent to reinvest those earnings internationally. Consequently, Diamond Offshore is no longer providing taxes on those foreign earnings and has reversed previously accrued taxes related to those earnings.

Boardwalk Pipeline

Boardwalk Pipeline derives revenues primarily from the transportation and storage of natural gas and natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) and gathering and processing of natural gas for third parties. Transportation services consist of firm natural gas transportation, wherebywhere the customer pays a capacity reservation charge to reserve pipeline capacity at certain receipt and delivery points along pipeline systems, plus a commodity and fuel charge on the volume of natural gas actually transported, and interruptible natural gas transportation, wherebywhere the customer pays to transport gas only when capacity is available and used. Boardwalk Pipeline offers firm natural gas storage services in which the customer reserves and pays for a specific amount of storage capacity, including injection and withdrawal rights, and interruptible storage and parking and lending (“PAL”) services where the customer receives and pays for capacity only when it is available and used. Some PAL agreements are paid for at inception of the service and revenues for these agreements are recognized as service is provided over the term of the agreement. Boardwalk Pipeline’s NGL contracts are generally fee-based and are dependent on actual volumes transported or stored, although in some cases minimum volume requirements apply. Boardwalk Pipeline’s NGL storage rates are market based rates and contracts are typically fixed-pricefixed price arrangements with escalation clauses. Boardwalk Pipeline is not in the business of buying and selling natural gas and NGLs other than for system management purposes, but changes in the level of natural gas and NGL prices may impact the volumes of gas transported and stored on its pipeline systems. Boardwalk Pipeline’s operating costs and expenses typically do not vary significantly based upon the amount of products transported, with the exception of fuel consumed at its compressor stations.

Market Conditions and Contract Renewals

Boardwalk Pipeline provides natural gas transportation services to customers that are directly connected to its pipeline system and, through interconnects with third party pipelines, to customers that are not directly connected to Boardwalk Pipeline’s system. Transportation rates that Boardwalk Pipeline can charge customers it serves through interconnects with third party pipelines are heavily influenced by current and anticipated basis differentials. Basis

The amountdifferentials, generally the difference in the price of natural gas being produced from unconventionalat receipt and delivery points across Boardwalk Pipeline’s natural gas productionpipeline system, influence how much customers are willing to pay to transport gas between those points. Basis differentials can be affected by, among other things, the availability and supply of natural gas, the proximity of supply areas has greatly increasedto end use markets, competition from other pipelines, including pipelines under development, available transportation and storage capacity, storage inventories, regulatory developments, weather and general market demand in recent years. This dynamic drovemarkets served by Boardwalk Pipeline’s pipeline systems. New sources of natural gas continue to be identified and developed in the pipeline industry,U.S., including Boardwalk Pipeline, to construct substantial new pipeline infrastructure to support this development. However, the oversupply of gas from these and other production areas has resulted in gas prices that are substantially lower than in recent years, which has caused producers to scale back production to levels below those that were expected when the new infrastructure was built. In addition, certain of these new supply basins, such as the Marcellus and the Utica Shaleshale plays, which are closer to the traditional high value markets served by interstate pipelines like Boardwalk Pipeline, a development that has further affected how natural gas moves across the interstate pipeline grid. These factors have led to increased competition in certain pipeline markets, as well as substantially narrower price differentials than previous years between producing/supply areas and market areas (basis spreads), which has put significant downward pressure on pricing for both firm and interruptible transportation capacity that Boardwalk Pipeline serves than the supply basins connected to Boardwalk Pipeline’s facilities. As a result, pipeline infrastructure has been and continues to be developed to move natural gas and NGLs from these supply basins to market areas, resulting in changes in pricing dynamics between supply basins, pooling points and market areas. Additionally, these new supplies of natural gas have reduced production or slowed production growth from supply areas connected to Boardwalk Pipeline’s pipelines and have caused some of the gas production that is currently marketing.supplied to Boardwalk Pipeline’s system to be diverted to other market areas. As a result of the new sources of supply and related pipeline infrastructure discussed above, basis differentials on Boardwalk Pipeline’s pipeline systems have narrowed significantly in recent years, reducing the transportation rates and other contract terms Boardwalk Pipeline does not expect basis spreads oncan negotiate with its system to improve in the current year.customers for available transportation capacity and for contracts due for renewal for its interruptible and firm transportation services.

As of December 31, 2012, aA substantial portion of Boardwalk Pipeline’s transportation capacity wasis contracted for under firm transportation agreements having a weighted-average remaining life of approximately 6.0 years. However, eachagreements. Each year a portion of Boardwalk Pipeline’s firm transportation agreements expire and mustneeds to be renewed or replaced. Due to the factors noted above, in recent periods Boardwalk Pipeline has renewed or replacedmany expiring contracts for most of the firm transportation capacity that expired in 2012, though on average at lower rates. The amount of contracted transportation capacity which will expire in 2013 is greaterrates and for shorter terms than in recent years.the past, which has materially adversely impacted its firm and interruptible transportation revenues. In light of the market conditions discussed above, natural gas transportation contracts that Boardwalk Pipeline expects that transportation contractshas renewed or entered into in 2013 will beand in recent years have been at lower rates, than expiring contracts. Remainingand any remaining available capacity will begenerally has been marketed and sold on aat lower rates under short term firm or interruptible basis, which will also becontracts, or in some cases not sold at all. As a result, capacity reservation charges under firm transportation agreements for the year ended December 31, 2013 were lower rates based on current market conditions.by $45 million than they were for 2012. Boardwalk Pipeline expects that these circumstances will negatively affectthis trend to continue and therefore may not be able to sell its available capacity, extend expiring contracts with existing customers or obtain replacement contracts at attractive rates or for the same term as the expiring contracts, all of which would continue to adversely impact its transportation revenues, earnings and distributable cash flows in 2013.and could impact Boardwalk Pipeline on a long term basis.

The market forMore recently, Boardwalk Pipeline has seen the value of its storage and PAL services is alsoadversely impacted by the factors discussed above, as well as bywhich have contributed to a narrowing of natural gas price differentials between time periods, such as winter to summer (time period price spreads). Time, and the price volatility of natural gas to decline significantly, reducing the rates Boardwalk Pipeline can charge for its storage and PAL services. Based on the current forward pricing curve, which is backwardated, time period price spreads declinedfor 2013 have significantly deteriorated from 2010the 2012 levels and Boardwalk Pipeline expects such conditions to 2011persist. In recent months, Boardwalk Pipeline has seen the deterioration of storage spreads accelerate and improvedthat trend is expected to continue into 2014. These market conditions, together with regulatory changes in the first halffinancial services industry, have also caused a number of 2012; however,gas marketers, which have traditionally been large consumers of Boardwalk Pipeline believes that current forward pricing curves indicate that the spreads for 2013 may not be as favorable. Forward pricing curves change frequently as a result of a variety of market factors, including weather, levels of storage gas and available capacity, among others and as such may not be a reliable predictor of actual future events. Accordingly, Boardwalk Pipeline cannot predict its future revenues from interruptiblePipeline’s storage and PAL services, due to exit the uncertaintymarket, further negatively impacting the market for those services. A reduced need for storage as supply increases, narrowing time period price spreads and volatilityfewer market participants has caused, and could continue to cause demand for Boardwalk Pipeline’s storage and PAL services to decline on a long term basis.

In February of 2014, Boardwalk Pipeline declared a quarterly distribution of $0.10 per unit, which was less than the quarterly distributions of $0.5325 per unit that have been declared and paid in recent prior periods, which reflects the market conditions discussed above.described above and the resulting cumulative impact on Boardwalk Pipeline’s business from the decline in transportation and storage revenues. Boardwalk Pipeline intends to use the increase in cash that is not distributed to unitholders to fund growth and/or to repay indebtedness. We have offered Boardwalk Pipeline up to $300 million of subordinated loans to fund growth, if it is needed. Boardwalk Pipeline intends to use those sources of capital to fund its growth and reduce its leverage (including its Debt-to-EBITDA ratio) in lieu of issuing additional limited partnership units which would be dilutive to unitholders. Boardwalk Pipeline cannot give assurances that it will complete future growth projects or acquisitions or, if completed, that they will be accretive to its earnings and cash flow, that Boardwalk Pipeline will be successful in reducing its leverage, or that Boardwalk

Pipeline will not issue and sell additional limited partnership units to fund its growth or for other partnership purposes.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes the results of operations for Boardwalk Pipeline for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 as presented in Note 2122 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012      2011      2010         2013   2012   2011 

 

 
(In millions)                              

Revenues:

                  

Other revenue, primarily operating

  $    1,187       $    1,144       $    1,128         $     1,231       $     1,187       $     1,144       

Net investment income

             1                

Investment losses

   (3               (3)    

 

 

Total

   1,184        1,144        1,129          1,232      1,184      1,144       

 

 

Expenses:

                  

Operating

   717        760        695          776      717      760       

Impairment of goodwill

   52       

Interest

   166        173        151          163      166      173       

 

 

Total

   883        933        846          991      883      933       

 

 

Income before income tax

   301        211        283          241      301      211       

Income tax expense

   (70      (57      (73)         (56)     (70)     (57)      

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (122      (77      (96)         (107)     (122)     (77)      

 

 

Net income attributable to Loews Corporation

  $109       $77       $114         $78       $109       $77       

 

 

2013 Compared with 2012

Total revenues increased $48 million for 2013 as compared with 2012. This increase is primarily due to $63 million of revenues earned from Boardwalk Louisiana Midstream LLC (“Louisiana Midstream”), acquired in October of 2012, a $30 million gain from the sale of storage gas and an increase in fuel revenues of $9 million primarily due to higher natural gas prices. The increase in revenues was partially offset by the market conditions discussed above, resulting in lower transportation revenues, excluding fuel, of $53 million and $4 million of reduced storage and PAL revenues.

Operating expenses increased $59 million for 2013, compared to 2012. This increase is primarily due to $38 million of expenses incurred by Louisiana Midstream, higher depreciation and property taxes of $9 million due to an increase in the asset base and increased fuel costs of $6 million due to higher natural gas prices.

Boardwalk Pipeline recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $52 million ($16 million after tax and noncontrolling interests) for the year ended December 31, 2013, representing the carrying value of goodwill related to its reporting unit which included goodwill associated with the acquisition of Petal Gas Storage, LLC (formerly referred to as Boardwalk HP Storage Company, LLC) (“Petal”) in December of 2011. The fair value of the reporting unit declined from the amount determined in 2012 primarily due to the recent narrowing of time period price spreads and reduced volatility which negatively affects the value of Boardwalk Pipeline’s storage and PAL services and the cumulative effect of reduced basis spreads on the value of Boardwalk Pipeline’s transportation services.

Net income decreased $31 million for 2013 as compared with 2012 reflecting higher revenues offset by increased expenses as discussed above. The percentage of income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased as a result of equity offerings in 2012 and 2013 by Boardwalk Pipeline, decreasing our ownership percentage from 59% in 2012 to 54% in 2013.

2012 Compared with 2011

Total revenues increased $40 million in 2012 as compared with 2011, primarily due to $63 million of revenues earned by Boardwalk HP Storage Company, LLC (“HP Storage”), acquired in December of 2011,Petal and Boardwalk Louisiana Midstream LLC (“Louisiana Midstream”), acquired in October of 2012, and higher PAL and storage revenues of $14 million resulting from improved market conditions. The increase in revenues was partially offset by a decrease in retained fuel of $34 million primarily due to lower natural gas prices.

Operating expenses decreased $43 million in 2012 as compared with 2011. The primary drivers of the decrease were charges incurred in 2011 including a $29 million impairment charge associated with Boardwalk Pipeline’s materials and supplies, an expense of $5 million representing an insurance deductible associated with replacing compressor assets and $4 million of gas losses associated with the Bistineau storage facility. In addition, in the 2012 period there were lower fuel costs of $21 million due to lower natural gas prices, lower general and administrative expenses of $16 million as a result of cost management activities and lower operation and maintenance expenses of $11 million primarily from lower maintenance project costs and outside services. These decreases were partially offset by $38 million of expenses incurred by HP StoragePetal and Louisiana Midstream and $9 million of asset impairment charges. The 2011 period included a gain of $9 million from the sale of storage gas. Interest expense decreased $7 million for 2012, primarily from a charge recorded in 2011 on the early extinguishment of debt, partially offset by increased debt levels and higher average interest rates.

2011 Compared with 2010

Total revenues increased $15 million in 2011 as compared with 2010. Gas transportation revenues, excluding fuel, increased $61 million primarily from increased capacities resulting from the completion of several compression projects in 2010, operating the Fayetteville Lateral at its design capacity and the acquisition of HP Storage. PAL and storage revenues decreased $19 million due to decreased parking opportunities from unfavorable natural gas price spreads between time periods and fuel retained decreased $16 million primarily due to lower natural gas prices.

Operating expenses increased $65 million in 2011 as compared with 2010. The increase includes a $29 million impairment charge associated with Boardwalk Pipeline’s materials and supplies, most of which was subsequently sold. There were also higher operation and maintenance expenses of $18 million primarily due to maintenance projects for pipeline integrity management and reliability spending and lower amounts of labor capitalized from fewer growth projects and higher depreciation and property taxes of $12 million associated with an increase in the asset base. These increases were partially offset by lower fuel consumed of $9 million primarily due to lower natural gas prices. Interest expense increased by $22 million in 2011, primarily from a $13 million charge on the early extinguishment of debt and $8 million resulting from higher average interest rates on Boardwalk Pipeline’s long term debt and lower capitalized interest.

HighMount

We use the following terms throughout this discussion of HighMount’s results of operations, with “equivalent” volumes computed with oil and NGL quantities converted to Mcf, on an energy equivalent ratio of one barrel to six Mcf:

 

Bbl

  

-

 

Barrel (of oil or NGLs)

Bcf

  

-

 

Billion cubic feet (of natural gas)

Bcfe

  

-

 

Billion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent

Mbbl

  

-

 

Thousand barrels (of oil or NGLs)

Mcf

  

-

 

Thousand cubic feet (of natural gas)

Mcfe

  

-

 

Thousand cubic feet of natural gas equivalent

MMBtu

  

-

 

Million British thermal units

HighMount’s revenues and profitability depend substantially on natural gas and oil prices and HighMount’s ability to increase its natural gas and oil production. For the period July 2008 through December 2012, NYMEX naturalNatural gas contract settlementand NGL prices have ranged from a high of $13.11 in July 2008remain at low levels due to a low of $2.04 in May 2012. This price decline is reflective of an increase in the supply of natural gas and NGL resulting from new sources of supply

recoverable from shale formations, primarily the result of technological advancements in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing. As a result, of the decline init has become uneconomical for HighMount to drill new natural gas prices, HighMount changedwells which has led it to change its drilling program in 2011 to develop properties that produce primarily oil andcapital investments strategy from natural gas liquidsproduction to benefit fromexploration and development of potential oil producing properties. HighMount has drilled a number of exploratory wells on its properties in the higher prices forMississippian Lime and Woodford Shale plays in Oklahoma and in the Wolfcamp zone of its Sonora acreage. Exploration of potential oil producing properties, including drilling and completion of horizontal wells, carries more risk and is significantly more expensive than drilling traditional vertical natural gas-producing wells. HighMount is not currently drilling new wells on its Oklahoma properties and has one drilling rig working in the Wolfcamp area. To date, these commodities. During 2012, NGL prices declined significantlyexploratory wells have not yielded sufficient quantities of oil to support commercial development of these properties. Further study and refinement of drilling techniques will be required in order to determine whether there is an economic development opportunity. HighMount has incurred substantial ceiling test and other impairment charges as a result HighMount reduced its overallof the market conditions and drilling programefforts discussed above and focused its capital investments primarilycould incur significant additional impairment charges in the future if these conditions continue or HighMount’s efforts to develop sufficient new proved reserves are not successful.

The focus on exploring oil producing properties. The reducedproperties has led to a reduction in natural gas and NGL prices, as well as the increased drilling costs developing HighMount’sproduction and an increase in oil reserves negatively impacted HighMount’s net cash flow.production. Natural gas production at HighMount has declined from 45.4 Bcf in 2011 to 33.0 Bcf in 2013. Revenues from the sale of NGL and oil, including the impact of hedges, amounted to 46%20% of HighMount’s total revenues for the year ended December 31, 20122013 as compared to 34%15% and 7% of its total revenue for the yearyears ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The price HighMount realizes for its production is also affected by HighMount’s hedging activities, as well as locational differences in market prices. As a result of ceiling test impairment charges recorded in 2012 which were primarily due to significant declines in natural gas and NGL prices, HighMount performed quarterly goodwill impairment tests and no impairment charges were required.

HighMount’s operating expenses consist primarily of production expenses, production and ad valorem taxes, as well as depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) expenses. Production expenses represent costs incurred to operate and maintain wells, related equipment and facilities and transportation costs and contain a significant fixed cost component. Production expenses per Mcfe increased primarily as a result of lower natural gas and NGL production that has absorbed HighMount’s fixed costs. HighMount’s increased focus on oil production also contributed to the increase in production cost per Mcfe due to HighMount’s oil projects generally requiring a higher cost to produce per equivalent unit than HighMount’s gas projects. Production and ad valorem taxes increase or decrease primarily when prices of natural gas and oil increase or decrease, but they are also affected by changes in production and state incentive programs, as well as appreciated property values. HighMount calculates depletion using the units-of-production method, which depletes the capitalized costs and future development costs associated with evaluated properties based on the ratio of production volumes for the current period to total remaining reserve volumes for the evaluated properties. HighMount’s depletion expense is affected by its capital spending program and projected future development costs, as well as reserve changes resulting from drilling programs, well performance and revisions due to changing commodity prices.

Production and Sales Statistics

Presented below are production and sales statistics related to HighMount’s operations for 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010:2011:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012   2011   2010     2013   2012   2011 

 

 

Gas production (Bcf)

   39.1       45.4       57.4           33.0       39.1       45.4        

Gas sales (Bcf)

   36.6       42.7       53.6           30.6       36.6       42.7        

NGL production/sales (Mbbls)

       2,002.2           2,357.2           2,693.7        

Oil production/sales (Mbbls)

   501.0       282.2       253.9           563.6       501.0       282.2        

NGL production/sales (Mbbls)

       2,357.2           2,693.7           3,008.9        

Equivalent production (Bcfe)

   56.2       63.3       77.0           48.4       56.2       63.3        

Equivalent sales (Bcfe)

   53.7       60.6       73.2           46.0       53.7       60.6        

Average realized prices without hedging results:

            

Gas (per Mcf)

  $2.67    $3.94    $4.30        $3.53    $2.67    $3.94      

NGL (per Bbl)

   37.35     52.70     40.96         31.84     37.35     52.70      

Oil (per Bbl)

   86.29     89.43     73.80         93.18     86.29     89.43      

Equivalent (per Mcfe)

   4.26     5.54     5.09         4.87     4.26     5.54      

Average realized prices with hedging results:

            

Gas (per Mcf)

  $4.24    $5.84    $6.03        $4.23    $4.24    $5.84      

NGL (per Bbl)

   38.36     39.60     34.84         36.05     38.36     39.60      

Oil (per Bbl)

   91.41     89.43     73.80         92.97     91.41     89.43      

Equivalent (per Mcfe)

   5.42     6.30     6.10         5.52     5.42     6.30      

Average cost per Mcfe:

            

Production expenses

  $1.33    $1.20    $1.12        $1.66    $1.33    $1.20      

Production and ad valorem taxes

   0.23     0.39     0.37         0.27     0.23     0.39      

General and administrative expenses

   0.76     0.68     0.62         0.86     0.76     0.68      

Depletion expense

   1.45     1.18     0.93         1.13     1.45     1.18      

In the second quarter of 2010, HighMount completed the sale of exploration and production assets located in the Antrim Shale in Michigan and the Black Warrior Basin in Alabama. The Michigan and Alabama properties represented approximately 17% in aggregate of HighMount’s total proved reserves as of December 31, 2009, prior to the sales.

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes the results of operations for HighMount for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 as presented in Note 2122 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.

 

Year Ended December 31  2012   2011   2010       2013     2012   2011   

 

 
(In millions)                        

Revenues:

              

Other revenue, primarily operating

  $        297     $        390     $        455         $      260         $      297         $      390       

Investment losses

      (34    (30)         (1)       (34)      

 

 

Total

   297      356      425          259      297      356       

 

 

Expenses:

              

Impairment of goodwill

   584       

Other operating expenses

              

Impairment of natural gas and oil properties

   680           291      680     

Operating

   239      245      258          252      239      245       

Interest

   14      46      61          17      14      46       

 

 

Total

   933      291      319          1,144      933      291       

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax

   (636    65      106          (885)     (636)     65       

Income tax (expense) benefit

   229      (24    (48)         311      229      (24)      

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation

  $(407   $41     $58         $(574)        $(407)        $41       

 

 

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, HighMount recorded ceiling test impairment charges of $291 million and $680 million ($186 million and $433 million after tax). The 2013 write-downs were primarily attributable to negative reserve revisions due to variability in well performance where HighMount is testing different horizontal target zones and hydraulic fracture designs and due to reduced average NGL prices used in the ceiling test calculations. The 2012 write-downs were the result of declines in natural gas and NGL prices. The December 31, 2013 ceiling test calculation was based on average 2013 prices of $3.67 per MMBtu for natural gas, $35.39 per Bbl for NGLs and $96.94 per Bbl for oil. The December 31, 2012 ceiling test calculation was based on average 2012 prices of $2.76 MMBtu for natural gas, $41.11 per Bbl for NGLs and $94.71 per Bbl for oil. Low natural gas and NGL prices, which are not anticipated to improve in the near term, and high drilling and completion costs of horizontal wells targeting oil reserves, compared to traditional vertical gas wells, as well as lower than anticipated production from recently completed wells, have adversely impacted HighMount’s results of operations and cash flows. The continuation of these factors could result in ceiling test impairment charges in future periods, which may be material.

Recognition of a ceiling test impairment charge is considered a triggering event for purposes of assessing any potential impairment of goodwill. The quantitative goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step process. The first step compares HighMount’s estimated fair value to its carrying value. Due to the continued low market prices for natural gas and NGLs, the recent history of quarterly ceiling test write-downs during 2012 and 2013 and potential for future impairments, and negative reserve revisions recognized during 2013, HighMount reassessed its goodwill impairment analysis. To determine fair value, HighMount used a market approach which required significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions primarily included, but were not limited to, earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, production and reserves, control premium, discount rates and required capital expenditures. These valuation techniques were based on analysis of comparable public companies, adjusted for HighMount’s growth profile. In the first step, HighMount determined that its carrying value exceeded its fair value requiring HighMount to perform the second step and to estimate the fair value of its assets and liabilities. The carrying value of goodwill is limited to the amount that HighMount’s estimated fair value exceeds the fair value of assets and liabilities. As a result, HighMount recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $584 million ($382 million after tax) for the year ended December 31, 2013, consisting of all of its remaining goodwill.

2013 Compared with 2012

HighMount’s operating revenues decreased $37 million for 2013 as compared with 2012 primarily due to reduced natural gas and NGL sales volumes and reduced NGL sales prices. HighMount sold 46.0 Bcfe in 2013 compared to 53.7 Bcfe in 2012. The decrease in sales volume was primarily due to the discontinued drilling of conventional vertical natural gas wells in recent years, as well as reduced maintenance of existing producing wells.

HighMount had hedges in place as of December 31, 2013 that covered approximately 59.9% and 20.9% of its total estimated 2014 and 2015 natural gas equivalent production at a weighted average price of $5.52 and $4.24 per Mcfe.

Operating expenses increased by $13 million for 2013 as compared with 2012 primarily as a result of an impairment charge of $34 million related to HighMount’s gathering pipelines in the Permian Basin due to low natural gas and NGL prices and decreased production, partially offset by lower DD&A expenses due to the impairment of natural gas and oil properties recorded in 2013 and 2012.

2012 Compared with 2011

HighMount’s operating revenues decreased $93 million in 2012 as compared with 2011 due to decreased natural gas and NGL prices and sales volumes. Average prices realized per Mcfe were $5.42 in 2012 compared to $6.30 in 2011. HighMount sold 53.7 Bcfe in 2012 compared to 60.6 Bcfe in 2011. The decrease in sales volume was primarily due to the continued reduction in capital spending on natural gas drilling since 2008.

HighMount had hedges in place as of December 31, 2012 that covered approximately 59.5% and 26.6% of its total estimated 2013 and 2014 natural gas equivalent production at a weighted average price of $6.27 and $5.39 per Mcfe.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, HighMount recorded non-cash ceiling test impairment charges of $680 million ($433 million after tax) related to the carrying value of its natural gas and oil properties. The write-downs were the result of declines in natural gas and NGL prices. The December 31, 2012 ceiling test calculation was based on average 2012 prices of $2.76 per MMBtu for natural gas, $41.11 per Bbl for NGLs and $94.71 per Bbl for oil. See Valuation of HighMount’s Proved Reserves included in Critical Accounting Estimates above for further information.

Operating expenses were $239 million and $245 million in 2012 and 2011. Production expenses and production and ad valorem taxes were $98 million in 2012 as compared with $109 million in 2011. DD&A expenses were $101 million in 2012 as compared with $94 million in 2011. The increase in DD&A expenses was primarily due to negative reserve revisions in 2011 and projected future development activity focused on developing oil reserves.

In connection with refinancing its $1.1 billion variable rate term loans, a pretax loss of $34 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2011, reflecting derivative losses from termination of interest rate hedge activities. Interest expense decreased $32 million in 2012 as compared with 2011 due to a lower outstanding debt balance in 2012.

2011 Compared with 2010

HighMount’s operating revenues decreased $65 million in 2011 as compared with 2010. Operating revenues decreased by $46 million due to the sale of HighMount’s assets in Michigan and Alabama in 2010. Permian Basin operating revenues decreased by $19 million on sales volumes of 60.6 Bcfe in 2011 compared to 66.5 Bcfe in 2010. Average prices realized per Mcfe for Permian Basin sales were $6.30 in 2011 compared to $6.02 in 2010, which reflects hedging activities. The decrease in Permian Basin sales volume is primarily due to the reduction in HighMount’s drilling activity in response to lower natural gas prices.

HighMount had hedges in place as of December 31, 2011 that covered approximately 51.7% and 16.3% of its total estimated 2012 and 2013 natural gas equivalent production at a weighted average price of $5.79 and $5.44 per Mcfe.

In connection with refinancing its $1.1 billion variable rate term loans a pretax loss of $34 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2011, reflecting derivative losses from termination of interest rate hedge activities. As a result of the Michigan and Alabama asset sales in 2010, HighMount recognized a pretax loss of $30 million in Investment losses related to its interest rate and commodity hedging activities. HighMount used the proceeds from the basin sales to reduce the outstanding debt under its term loans by $500 million, which resulted in a $15 million decrease in interest expense in 2011.

Operating expenses decreased $13 million in 2011 as compared with 2010. The decline reflects a $21 million decrease related to the sale of HighMount’s assets in Michigan and Alabama, partially offset by an $8 million increase in operating expenses in the Permian Basin. The increase in operating expenses is due to higher DD&A expenses, partially offset by lower general and administrative expenses.

DD&A expenses were $94 million and $92 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. This reflects a $10 million increase in the Permian Basin, due to negative reserve revisions and projected future development, offset by an $8 million decrease due to the sale of HighMount’s assets in Michigan and Alabama.

Loews Hotels

The following table summarizes the results of operations for Loews Hotels for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 as presented in Note 2122 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012     2011     2010     

 

 
(In millions)                

Revenues:

        

Other revenue, primarily operating

  $        396     $        336     $        307       

Net investment income

   1      1      1       

 

 

Total

   397      337      308       

 

 

Expenses:

        

Other Operating expenses

        

Operating

   366      306      284       

Depreciation

   30      29      29       

Equity income from joint ventures

   (24    (24    (17)      

Interest

   11      9      10       

 

 

Total

   383      320      306       

 

 

Income before income tax

   14      17      2       

Income tax expense

   (7    (4    (1)      

 

 

Net income attributable to Loews Corporation

  $7     $13     $1       

 

 

EBITDA

  $55     $55     $41       

 

 

Year Ended December 31    2013     2012     2011     

 

 
(In millions)                  

Revenues:

            

Other revenue, primarily operating

    $        380       $        396       $    336       

Net investment income

                1       

 

 

Total

     380        397        337       

 

 

Expenses:

            

Other operating expenses

            

Operating

     356        366        306       

Depreciation

     32        30        29       

Equity income from joint ventures

     (13)       (24)       (24)      

Interest

            11        9       

 

 

Total

     384        383        320       

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax

     (4)       14        17       

Income tax (expense) benefit

            (7)       (4)      

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation

    $(3)      $      $13       

 

 

EBITDA

    $37       $55       $55       

 

 

Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) is an indicator of operating performance used by Loews Hotels to measure its ability to service debt, fund capital expenditures and expand its business. EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that is not meant to replace net income as defined by GAAP. The following table reconciles EBITDA to Net income attributable to Loews Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

 

Year Ended December 31  2012      2011      2010         2013         2012         2011     

 

 
(In millions)                                    

EBITDA

  $            55      $            55      $            41           $          37           $          55           $55       

Depreciation

   (30     (29     (29)           (32)           (30)           (29)      

Interest

   (11     (9     (10)           (9)           (11)           (9)      

Income tax expense

   (7     (4     (1)      

Income tax (expense) benefit

     1            (7)           (4)      

 

 

Net income attributable to Loews Corporation

  $7      $13      $1       

Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation

    $(3)          $7           $      13       

 

 

2012 Compared with 2011

Revenues increased by $60 million in 2012Results of operations for 2013 as compared to 2011. Net income decreased by $6 million as compared to 2011.

The increase in revenues is due to $21 million from2012 include the impact of the 2013 closure of the Loews Regency Hotel for renovation and the addition of the Loews HollywoodMadison Hotel and the Loews Boston Hotel in 2013 to the portfolio of owned propertieshotels for approximately six months. In July of 2013, partial equity interests in the Loews Madison Hotel and the Loews Boston Hotel were sold. Results for 2012 include the Loews Hollywood Hotel for approximately five months prior to a partial equity interest sale in November of 2012 and higher revenue per available room (“RevPAR”). RevPAR is an industry measure of the combined effect of occupancy rates and average room rates on room revenues. Other hotel operating revenues primarily include guest charges for food and beverages. RevPAR, occupancy rates and average room rates as discussed below are for owned hotels only. RevPAR increased $5.71 to $168.89 in 2012 as compared to 2011 reflecting improving occupancy and average room rates. Occupancy rates increased to 75.3% in 2012 from 73.6% in 2011. Average room rates increased by $2.69, or 1.2%, in 2012 as compared to 2011. In addition, revenues include $4 million from the gain on2012. Upon the sale of the equity interests, Loews Denver HotelHotels’ share of earnings for these hotels is included in the fourth quarter of 2012.Equity income from joint ventures.

Revenues and operating expenses for 2013 and 2012 also include $57 million and $27 million of cost reimbursements from joint venture and managed properties, relating mainly to payroll incurred on behalf of the owners of hotel properties managed by us.Loews Hotels.

2013 Compared with 2012

Revenues excluding reimbursables decreased by $47 million in 2013 as compared to 2012, primarily due to the 2013 closure of the Loews Regency Hotel.

Revenue per available room (“RevPAR”) is an industry measure of the combined effect of occupancy rates and average room rates on room revenues. Other hotel operating revenues, not included in RevPAR, primarily include guest charges for food and beverages. RevPAR, occupancy rates and average room rates as discussed below are for owned and joint venture hotels. RevPAR decreased $5.41 to $168.67 for 2013 as compared to 2012 reflecting a decrease in occupancy and average room rates. Occupancy rates decreased to 75.2% in 2013 from 76.3% in 2012. Average room rates decreased by $3.60, or 1.6%, in 2013 as compared to 2012. Excluding the Loews Regency Hotel which was closed for renovation throughout 2013, RevPAR increased $3.76 for 2013 as compared to 2012, reflecting an increase in average room rates.

Operating expenses excluding reimbursables decreased $40 million for 2013 as compared to 2012, primarily due to the closure of the Loews Regency Hotel, partially offset by higher corporate expenses related to hotels recently acquired and under development. In addition, expenses were reduced by $3 million and $7 million in 2013 and 2012 related to recoveries of a loan guarantee payment.

Equity incomeearnings from joint venture properties decreased in 2013 as compared to 2012, primarily due to the impact of renovations and the development of joint venture properties.

2012 Compared with 2011

Revenues excluding reimbursables increased by $33 million in 2012 is consistent with 2011. Increasesas compared to 2011, primarily due to the addition of the Loews Hollywood Hotel in 2012 and higher RevPAR.

Owned and joint venture hotels RevPAR increased $8.93 to $174.08 in 2012 as compared to 2011 reflecting improving occupancy and average room rates; occupancy rates increased to 76.3% in 2012 from 73.6% in 2011; and average room rates at joint venture properties was offsetincreased by lower occupancy rates$3.65, or 1.6%, in 2012 as compared to 2011.

Operating expenses excluding reimbursables increased $60$33 million in 2012 as compared to 2011, primarily due to expenses of $22 million, including acquisition and transition related costs, from the Loews Hollywood Hotel and $13 million of costs related to the 2013 closure of the Loews Regency Hotel for renovation, partially offset by $7 million related to the partial recovery of a loan guarantee payment. In addition, operating expenses in 2012 include $27 million for cost reimbursements from joint venture and managed properties as discussed above.

2011 Compared with 2010

Revenues increased by $29 million in 2011 as compared to 2010. Net income increased by $12 million as compared to 2010.

RevPAR increased $15.29 to $163.18 in 2011 as compared to 2010. The increase in RevPAR reflects improving occupancy and average room rates. Occupancy rates increased to 73.6% in 2011 from 70.1% in 2010. Average room rates increased by $10.46, or 5.0%, in 2011 as compared to 2010.

The improvement in operating results for 2011 as compared to 2010 is due primarily to increases in RevPAR described above, and increases in equity income from joint venture properties reflecting higher occupancy and average room rates.

Corporate and Other

Corporate and Other operations consist primarily of investment income at the Parent Company, corporate interest expenses and other corporate administrative costs. Investment income includes earnings on cash and short term investments held at the Parent Company level to meet current and future liquidity needs, as well as results of limited partnership investments and the trading portfolio managed to take advantage of potential market opportunities.portfolio.

The following table summarizes the results of operations for Corporate and Other for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 as presented in Note 2122 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012 2011 2010     2013   2012   2011 

 

 
(In millions)                    

Revenues:

          

Net investment income

  $61   $1   $        187         $        141     $          61     $            1       

Other

   1    (2  (3)                   (2)      

 

 

Total

   62    (1  184          143      62      (1)      

 

 

Expenses:

          

Operating

           106    87    80          98      106      87       

Interest

   40    44    47          62      40      44       

 

 

Total

   146    131    127          160      146      131       

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax

   (84  (132  57       

Income tax (expense) benefit

   29              47    (24)      

Loss before income tax

   (17)     (84)     (132)      

Income tax benefit

        29      47       

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation

  $(55 $(85 $33       

Net loss attributable to Loews Corporation

  $(10)    $(55)    $(85)      

 

 

2013 Compared with 2012

Net investment income increased by $80 million in 2013 as compared to 2012, primarily due to improved performance of the equity and fixed income investments in the trading portfolio and improved performance of limited partnership investments for 2013.

Interest expense increased $22 million for 2013, primarily due to a May of 2013 public offering of $500 million aggregate principal amount of 2.6% senior notes due May 15, 2023 and $500 million aggregate principal amount of 4.1% senior notes due May 15, 2043.

Net results improved $45 million for 2013 as compared to 2012, primarily due to the change in revenues and expenses discussed above.

2012 Compared with 2011

RevenuesNet investment income increased by $63$60 million for 2012 as compared to 2011, primarily due to improved performance of equity and fixed income investments in the trading portfolio, partially offset by lower performance of limited partnership investments for 2012.

Net results improved $30 million for 2012 as compared to 2011. These changes were due primarily to the change in revenues discussed above, partially offset by an increase in corporate overhead expenses and reduced corporate overhead allocated to our subsidiaries.

2011 Compared with 2010

Revenues decreased by $185 million in 2011 as compared to 2010. There was a net loss of $85 million in 2011 as compared to net income of $33 million in 2010. Due to less favorable equity investment returns and overall capital market volatility, the results of the trading portfolio were flat for 2011 as compared to significant gains in 2010. Earnings on cash and short term investments were also negatively impacted in 2011 by lower effective income yields.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

CNA Financial

Cash Flows

CNA’s primary operating cash flow sources are premiums and investment income from its insurance subsidiaries. CNA’s primary operating cash flow uses are payments for claims, policy benefits and operating expenses, including interest expense on corporate debt. Additionally, cash may be paid or received for income taxes.

For 2012,2013, net cash provided by operating activities was $1.3$1.2 billion as compared with $1.3 billion for 2012. Tax payments were $129 million in 2013 as compared to tax recoveries of $29 million in 2012. Additionally, increased premium receipts were partially offset by increased claim payments.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.7 billion forin 2011. Cash flows resulting from reinsurance contract commutations are reported as operating activities. During 2012, operatingOperating cash flows were decreasedincreased by $30$547 million in 2011 related to net cash outflowsinflows from commutations as compared with net cash inflows of $547 million during 2011. Additionally, CNA received a $29 million tax refund in 2012 as compared to tax payments of $61 million in 2011.

Net cash used by operating activities was $89 million in 2010. As further discussed in Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 and previously referenced in this MD&A, in 2010 CNA completed the Loss Portfolio Transfer transaction. As a result of this transaction, operating cash flows were reduced for the initial net cash settlement with NICO. Excluding the impact of this transaction, net cash provided by operating activities was approximately $1.8 billion for 2010.commutations.

Cash flows from investing activities include the purchase and disposition of available-for-sale financial instruments. Additionally, cash flows from investing activities may include the purchase and sale of businesses, land, buildings, equipment and other assets not generally held for resale.

Net cash used by investing activities was $934$898 million for 2012,2013, as compared with net cash used of$934 million and $1.1 billion for 20112012 and net cash provided of $767 million for 2010.2011. The cash flow from investing activities is impacted by various factors such as the anticipated payment of claims, financing activity, asset/liability management and individual security buy and sell decisions made in the normal course of portfolio management. Additionally, during 2012, CNA acquired Hardy. Net cash provided by investing activities in 2010 primarily related to the sale of short term investments which was used to fund the $1.9 billion initial net cash settlement with NICO as discussed above.

Cash flows from financing activities may include proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities, outflows for stockholdershareholder dividends or repayment of debt and outlays to reacquire equity instruments. Net cash used by financing activities was $264 million, $239 million and $644 million for 2013, 2012 and $742 million for 2012, 2011 and 2010.2011.

Liquidity

CNA believes that its present cash flows from operations, investing activities and financing activities are sufficient to fund its current and expected working capital and debt obligation needs and CNA does not expect this to change in the near term. There are currently no amounts outstanding under CNA’s $250 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility.facility and no borrowings outstanding through CNA’s membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (“FHLBC”).

CNA has an effective Registration Statement on Form S-3 registering the future sale of an unlimited amount of its debt and equity securities.

Dividends

Dividends of $0.60$0.80 per share of CNA’s common stock were declared and paid in 2012.2013. On February 8, 2013,7, 2014, CNA’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.20$0.25 per share and a special dividend of $1.00 per share, payable March 7, 201312, 2014 to stockholdersshareholders of record on February 21, 2013.24, 2014. The declaration and payment of future dividends is at the discretion of CNA’s Board of Directors and will depend on many factors, including CNA’s earnings, financial condition, business needs, and regulatory constraints.

Ratings

Ratings are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies. CNA’s insurance company subsidiaries are rated by major rating agencies and these ratings reflect the rating agency’s opinion of the insurance company’s financial strength, operating performance, strategic position and ability to meet its obligations to policyholders. Agency ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, and may be revised or

withdrawn at any time by the issuing organization. Each agency’s rating should be evaluated independently of any other agency’s rating. One or more of these agencies could take action in the future to change the ratings of CNA’s insurance subsidiaries.

The table below reflects the various group ratings issued by A.M. Best Company (“A.M. Best”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and Standard & Poor’s (“S&P&P”) for the property and casualty and life companies. The table also includes the ratings for CNA senior debt.

 

   Insurance Financial Strength Ratings  Corporate Debt Ratings

 

   Property & Casualty  Life  CNA

 

   

CCC


Group

  

Western


Group

  CAC  Senior Debt

 

A.M. Best

  A  A  A-  bbb

Moody’s

  A3  Not rated  Not rated  Baa2

S&P

      A-A  A-A  Not rated  BBB-BBB

S&P maintains a positive outlook and A.M. Best, maintainsMoody’s and S&P each maintain a stable outlook on CNA. In June of 2012, Moody’s2013, S&P upgraded CNA’s debt rating to Baa2 with a stable outlook, affirmed CNA’s insurance financial strength rating and revised its outlook on CNA’s financial strength rating to positive from stable.

If CNA’s property and casualty insurance financial strength ratings were downgraded below current levels, its businessto A and resultsupgraded the credit rating on the senior debt of operations could be materially adversely affected. The severityCNA to BBB. In December 2013, Moody’s revised their outlook on CNA’s financial strength rating to stable from positive.

Hardy benefits from the collective financial strength of the impact on CNA’s businessLloyd’s market, which is dependent on the level of downgraderated A+ by S&P and for certain products, whichA by A.M. Best. The outlook by both rating agency takes the rating action. Among the adverse effects in the event of such downgrades would be the inability to obtain a material volume of business from certain major insurance brokers, the inability to sell a material volume of CNA’s insurance products to certain markets and the required collateralization of certain future payment obligations or reserves. Downgrades of corporate debt ratings could result in adverse effects upon CNA’s liquidity position, including negatively impacting CNA’s ability to access capital markets, and increasing its financing costs.agencies is positive.

Further, additional collateralization may be required for certain settlement agreements and assumed reinsurance contracts, as well as derivative contracts, if CNA’s ratings or other specific criteria fall below certain thresholds.

Diamond Offshore

Cash and investments totaled $2.1 billion at December 31, 2013, compared to $1.5 billion at December 31, 2012, compared to $1.2 billion at December 31, 2011.2012. In 2012,2013, Diamond Offshore paid cash dividends totaling $490 million, consisting of aggregate regular cash dividends of $69 million and aggregate special cash dividends of $421 million. On February 4, 2013,5, 2014, Diamond Offshore declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.125 per share and a special dividend of $0.75 per share.

Cash provided by operating activities in 20122013 was $1.3$1.1 billion, compared to $1.4$1.3 billion in 2011,2012, a decrease of $109$245 million compared to the 20112012 period, primarily due to lower earnings. Cash used in investing activities in 2012 decreased $245 million compared to 2011. This decrease was due to the sale of six jack-up rigs for cash proceeds of $132 million in 2012 and higher capital expenditures in 2011 related to the first installments for the construction of three new ultra-deepwater drillships.

Diamond Offshore is currently obligated under two vessel modificationvarious agreements and four turnkey contracts forin connection with the construction of two semisubmersible rigsthree ultra-deepwater drillships, an ultra-deepwater floater, a deepwater floater, and four new ultra-deepwater drillships. Diamond Offshore estimates thata North Sea enhancement project. TheOcean Onyx and the aggregate cost for the constructionOcean BlackHawk were delivered in December of the two semisubmersible rigs2013 and January of 2014 and the four new drillships, including commissioning, spares and project management, to be approximately $680final installments on these construction contracts aggregating $403 million and $2.6 billion,were paid in January of which $93 million and $648 million has already been paid.

2014. The following is a summary of Diamond Offshore’s remaining construction projects as of February 5, 2014:

(In millions)  Expected
Delivery (a)
  Total Project
Cost (b)
   Project
Expenditures
to date (c)
 

 

 

New rig construction:

      

Ultra-deepwater drillships:

      

Ocean BlackHornet

  Q2 2014  $635          $204         

Ocean BlackRhino

  Q3 2014   645           189         

Ocean BlackLion

  Q1 2015   655           171         

Ultra-deepwater floater:

      

Ocean GreatWhite

  Q1 2016   755           190         

Deepwater floater:

      

Ocean Apex

  Q3 2014   370           269         

Enhancement project:

      

Mid-water floater Ocean Patriot

  Q2 2014   120           50         

In September of 2012, Diamond Offshore entered into a $750 million syndicated, senior unsecured five-year revolving credit agreement for general corporate purposes, that provides for revolving loans, up to $250 million in performance or other standby letters of credit and up to $75 million in swingline loans. As of December 31, 2012, there were no loans or letters of credit outstanding under the credit agreement.

(a)

Represents expected delivery date of vessel from shipyard and does not include additional non-operating days for commissioning, contract preparation and mobilization to initial area of operation, which will occur prior to the rig being placed in service.

(b)

Total project costs include contractual payments for shipyard construction, commissioning, capital spares and project management costs and does not include capitalized interest.

(c)

Represents total project expenditures from inception of project to February 5, 2014, excluding project-to-date capitalized interest.

For 2013,2014, Diamond Offshore has budgeted approximately $1.8$2.1 billion for capital expenditures of which approximately $1.3$1.5 billion willand $82 million are expected to be spent towardson current rig construction projects and the construction of its new drillships and semisubmersible rigs,Ocean Patriot North Sea enhancement project and approximately $120$184 million is expected to be spent on a service life extension project for theOcean Confidence. The remainder will be spent on the North Sea enhancement project for theOcean Patriot.Diamond Offshore’s ongoing rig equipment enhancement/replacement program. Diamond Offshore expects to finance its 20132014 capital expenditures through the use of existing cash balances and cash flows from operations.

In addition,November of 2013, Diamond Offshore may,completed a public offering of $250 million aggregate principal amount of 3.5% senior notes due November 1, 2023 and $750 million aggregate principal amount of 4.9% senior notes due November 1, 2043. Diamond Offshore intends to use the net proceeds of $988 million from time to time, issue debt or equity securities, or a combination thereof, to finance capital expenditures, the acquisition of assets and businesses orthis offering for general corporate purposes. Diamond Offshore’s ability to accesspurposes, including the capital markets by issuing debtredemption, repurchase or equity securities will be dependent on its resultsretirement of operations, its current financial condition, current market conditions and other factors beyond its control.

A substantial portion of Diamond Offshore’s cash flows has been and is expected to continue to be invested in the enhancement$250 million principal amount of its drilling fleet. Diamond Offshore determines the5.2% senior notes due September 1, 2014 and $250 million principal amount of cash required to meet its capital commitments by evaluating its rig construction obligations, the need to upgrade rigs to meet specific customer requirements and its ongoing rig equipment enhancement and replacement programs. 4.9% senior notes due July 1, 2015.

As a result of Diamond Offshore’s intention to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of its wholly owned subsidiary, Diamond Offshore International Limited (“DOIL”), to finance its foreign activities, Diamond Offshore does not expect such earnings to be available for distribution to its stockholders or to finance its domestic activities. However, Diamond Offshore believes that the operating cash flows generated by and cash reserves of DOIL, and the operating cash flows available to and cash reserves of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. will be sufficient to meet both its working capital requirements and its capital commitments overcommitments. However, in light of the next twelve months.significant cash requirements of Diamond Offshore’s capital expansion program in 2014 and 2015, Diamond Offshore may make use of its credit facility to finance its capital expenditures, working capital requirements and to maintain a certain level of cash reserves. Diamond Offshore will however, continue to make periodic assessments based on its capital spending programs and industry conditions and will adjust capital spending programs if required. Diamond Offshore, may, from time to time, issue debt or equity securities, or a combination thereof, to finance capital expenditures, the acquisition of assets and

businesses or for general corporate purposes. Diamond Offshore’s ability to access the capital markets by issuing debt or equity securities will be dependent on its results of operations, current financial condition, current market conditions and other factors beyond its control.

Boardwalk Pipeline

At December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, cash and investments amounted to $4$29 million and $23$4 million. Funds from operations for the year ended December 31, 20122013 amounted to $534 million, compared to $576 million compared to $454 million in 2011.2012. In 20122013 and 2011,2012, Boardwalk Pipeline’s capital expenditures were $227$295 million and $142$227 million. During 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline purchased from us the remaining 80% interest in HP StoragePetal for $285 million and acquired Louisiana Midstream for $620 million. These acquisitions were funded using cash from operations, borrowings under Boardwalk Pipeline’s revolving credit facility and debt and equity offerings as further discussed below.offerings. For the years ended December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, Boardwalk Pipeline paid cash distributions of $479$534 million and $420$479 million to its partners.

Boardwalk Pipeline’s ability to access the capital markets for debt and equity financing under reasonable terms depends on its financial condition, credit ratings and market conditions.In May of 2013, Boardwalk Pipeline anticipates that its existing capital resources,sold 12.7 million common units in a public offering and received net proceeds of $377 million, including the revolving credit facility and future cash flows generatedan $8 million contribution from operations will be adequateus to fund its operations, including its maintenance capital expenditures. Boardwalk Pipeline may seek to access the capital markets to fund some or all of its growth capital expenditures, acquisitions or formaintain our 2% general corporate purposes, including to refinance all or a portion of its indebtedness, a significant amount of which matures in the next five years.partner interest.

In April of 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline entered into a Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement (“Amended Credit Agreement”) with aggregate lending commitments of $1.0 billion. The Amended Credit Agreement has a maturity date of April 27, 2017. As of December 31, 2012,2013, Boardwalk Pipeline had $302$175 million of loansborrowings outstanding under thisits revolving credit facility with a weighted-averageweighted average interest rate of 1.3% and had no letters of credit issued. As of December 31, 2012,2013, Boardwalk Pipeline was in compliance with all covenant requirements under the credit facility.

In 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline issued $300 million of 4.0% senior notes due June 2022 and $300 million of 3.4% senior notes due February 2023. The proceeds were used to redeem at maturity $225 million of 5.8% senior notes

due August 2012, repay in full its $200 million variable rate term loan due December 2016 and repay the $100 million of borrowings outstanding under the Subordinated Loan Agreement with us. The remaining proceeds were used to repay borrowings under Boardwalk Pipeline’s revolving credit facility.

In October of 2012, as part of financing the acquisition of Louisiana Midstream, Boardwalk Pipeline entered into a $225 million variable rate term loan due October 1, 2017.

In February, August and October of 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline sold 9.2 million, 11.6 million and 11.2 million common units in public offerings and received net proceeds of $250 million, $318 million and $298 million, including $5 million, $7 million and $6 million contributions from us to maintain our 2% general partner interest. The net proceeds were used to repay borrowings under Boardwalk Pipeline’s revolving credit facility, to purchase the remaining equity ownership of HP Storage and to acquire Louisiana Midstream.

Boardwalk Pipeline incurs substantial costs for ongoing maintenance of its pipeline systems and related facilities, including those incurred for pipeline integrity management activities, equipment overhauls, general upkeep and repairs. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”) has developed regulations that require transportation pipeline operators to implement integrity management programs to comprehensively evaluate certain areas along pipelines and take additional measures to protect pipeline segments located in highly populated areas. These regulations have resulted in an overall increase in Boardwalk Pipeline’s ongoing maintenance costs. Due to recent widely-known incidents that have occurred on certain pipelines in the U.S., it is possible that PHMSA may develop more stringent regulations. Boardwalk Pipeline could incur significant additional costs if new or more stringently interpreted pipeline safety requirements are implemented.

In 2013, Boardwalk Pipeline executed a series of agreements with the Williams Companies, Inc. to develop the Bluegrass Project, a joint venture project that would transport NGLs from the Marcellus and Utica shale plays to the petrochemical and export complex in the Lake Charles, Louisiana area, and the construction of related fractionation, storage and liquefied petroleum gas terminal export facilities. In connection with the transaction, Boardwalk Pipeline and Boardwalk Pipelines Holding Corp. (“BPHC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of ours, have entered into separate joint venture arrangements for purposes of funding the project. Boardwalk Pipeline and BPHC have contributed a total of $79 million to the project as of December 31, 2013. Approval and completion of the project is subject to, among other conditions, execution of customer contracts sufficient to support the project, acquisition of right-of-way along the pipeline route, and the parties’ receipt of all necessary approvals, including board approvals and regulatory approvals, such as antitrust clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act and approvals by the FERC, among others.

Boardwalk Pipeline expects total capital expenditures to be approximately $350$420 million in 2013,2014, including approximately $100$90 million for maintenance capital, $42$249 million of which will be related to pipeline integrity management.the Southeast Market Expansion and $23 million related to the Ohio Louisiana Access Project. In 2012,2013, total capital expenditures were $227$295 million, of which $80$70 million was recorded as maintenance capital.

Boardwalk Pipeline’s ability to access the capital markets for debt and equity financing under reasonable terms depends on its financial condition, credit ratings and market conditions. Boardwalk Pipeline expectsanticipates that its existing capital resources, including the revolving credit facility and future cash flows generated from operations will be adequate to spend approximately $250fund its operations, including maintenance capital expenditures. To help fund growth in 2014, we have offered to provide Boardwalk Pipeline with up to $300 million in 2013 onsubordinated debt if it is required. Although Boardwalk Pipeline anticipates that its existing capital resources including the subordinated loan will be adequate to fund its current expansiongrowth projects, including $33 million relatedBoardwalk Pipeline may seek to access the Southeast Market Expansion, $73 million relatedcapital markets to fund some or all capital expenditures for future growth projects or acquisitions, or to repay or refinance all or a portion of its indebtedness, a significant amount of which matures in the South Texas Eagle Ford Expansion, $16 million related to the Natural Gas Salt Dome Storage Project and $39 million related to the Choctaw Brine Supply Expansion Project.next five years.

HighMount

At December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, cash and investments amounted to $10$29 million and $85$10 million. Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $104 million and $151 million in 2013 and $140 million in 2012 and 2011.2012. Key drivers of net operating cash flows are commodity prices, production volumes and operating costs.

Cash used in investing activities in 20122013 was $336$224 million, compared to $292$336 million in 2011.2012. Cash used in investing activities in 2013 is net of proceeds received from the sale of HighMount’s assets in the Texas Panhandle of approximately $33 million. In accordance with the full cost method of accounting, proceeds from the sale were accounted for as a reduction of capitalized costs, and recorded as a credit to Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization. The primary driver of cash used in investing activities is capital spent developing HighMount’s natural gas and oil reserves. In addition, in 2011, HighMount paid approximately $106 million for the acquisition of working interests in oil and gas properties which was funded by a capital contribution from us. HighMount expects to spend approximately $270 million on capital expenditures in 2013 developing its natural gas and oil reserves, with a focus on oil drilling opportunities. Funds for capital expenditures and working capital requirements are expected to be provided primarily from operating activities the available capacity under the revolving credit facility and capital contributions from us.

At December 31, 2012, HighMount had $600 million of term loans outstanding and $110 million was outstanding under HighMount’s $250 million revolving credit facility. HighMount’s credit agreement governing its term loans and revolving credit facility contains financial covenants typical for these types of agreements, including a maximum debt to capitalization ratio and a minimum ratio of the net present value of its projected future cash flows from its proved natural gas and oil reserves to total debt. The calculation of net present value, performed at least annually,year-end, is based on commodity prices determined by the lenders.lenders and HighMount’s proved reserves at the time of measurement. A decline in commodity prices can reduce HighMount’s borrowing capacity requiring repayment of a portion of its lineterm loans. Due to the current limited capacity of HighMount’s credit funded by a capital contribution from us. As a result of declining commodity prices, in 2012,agreement, we made a $100$210 million of capital

contribution contributions to HighMount in 2013 to fund repayment of which $90$110 million was used to repay a portion of the amount outstanding under the line of credit in order to meet debt covenant requirements. In January of 2013, HighMount borrowed an additional $10HighMount’s revolving loan and $100 million under its revolving credit facility, bringing total borrowingsterm loans. In addition, during 2013, we made $139 million of capital contributions to $720 million.HighMount for capital expenditures focused on the exploration and development of oil producing properties. The credit agreement also contains customary restrictions or limitations on HighMount’s ability to engage in certain transactions, including transactions with affiliates. At December 31, 2012, HighMount wascurrently has $480 million of term loans outstanding and is in compliance with all of its covenants under the credit agreement.

Loews Hotels

Funds from operations continueLoews Hotels added two properties to exceed operating requirements. its portfolio in 2013, the Loews Madison Hotel and the Loews Boston Hotel. These acquisitions were initially funded with existing cash balances, debt and capital contributions by us. Subsequently, Loews Hotels sold half of its equity interests in both properties.

Cash and investments totaled $53 million at December 31, 2013, as compared to $43 million at December 31, 2012, as compared to $81 million at December 31, 2011.

In January of 2013 the Loews Regency Hotel closed for an extensive renovation, with an anticipated completion in the fourth quarter of this year. Capital expenditures for the renovation are estimated to be approximately $85 million.

Loews Hotels has added three properties to its portfolio consisting of the Loews Hollywood Hotel in 2012 and the Loews Boston Back Bay Hotel and the Loews Madison Hotel in 2013. These acquisitions were funded with existing cash balances, third party joint venture equity, debt and approximately $88 million of net capital contributions by us.

2012. Funds for future capital expenditures, including acquisitions of new properties, joint venture capital contributions, maintenance spending, renovation projectsrenovations and working capital requirements willare expected to be provided from operations, refinancing, newly incurred debt, existing cash balances and advances or capital contributions from us.

Corporate and Other

Parent Company cash and investments, net of receivables and payables, at December 31, 20122013 totaled $3.9$4.7 billion, as compared to $3.3$3.9 billion at December 31, 2011. During 2012,2012. In May of 2013, we received $683net proceeds of $983 million, after deducting the underwriters’ discounts, commissions and offering expenses, in connection with a public offering of $500 million aggregate principal amount of 2.6% senior notes due May 15, 2023 and $500 million aggregate principal amount of 4.1% senior notes due May 15, 2043. In addition, during 2013, we received $736 million in interest and dividends from our subsidiaries, $285 million from the sale of our 80% ownership interest in HP Storage to Boardwalk Pipeline and $100 million from the repayment of subordinated debt by Boardwalk Pipeline.subsidiaries. These inflows were partially offset by the payment of $222$228 million to fund treasury stock purchases, net capital contributionsthe payment of approximately $100 million to our subsidiaries and $99$97 million of cash dividends to our shareholders.shareholders and capital contributions of approximately $680 million to our subsidiaries.

On October 9, 2013, all of the 22.9 million class B units of Boardwalk Pipeline were converted by us into common units on a one-for-one basis, pursuant to the terms of the Boardwalk Pipeline partnership agreement. After the conversion we held 125.6 million common units.

As of December 31, 2012,2013, there were 391,805,166387,210,096 shares of Loews common stock outstanding. Depending on market and other conditions, we may purchase our shares and shares of our and our subsidiaries’subsidiaries outstanding common stock in the open market or otherwise. During the year ended December 31, 2012,2013, we purchased 5.64.9 million shares of Loews common stock at an aggregate cost of $222 million.stock.

We have an effective Registration Statement on Form S-3 registering the future sale of an unlimited amount of our debt and equity securities.

We continue to pursue conservative financial strategies while seeking opportunities for responsible growth. These include the expansion of existing businesses, full or partial acquisitions and dispositions, and opportunities for efficiencies and economies of scale.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Contractual Obligations

Our contractual payment obligations are as follows:

 

  Payments Due by Period   Payments Due by Period 
December 31, 2012  Total      

     Less than

     1 year

 1-3 years     3-5 years     More than  
5 years  
 
  

 

 

 
December 31, 2013  Total   Less than
1 year
   1-3 years   3-5 years   More than  
5 years  
 

 

 
(In millions)                                            

Debt (a)

  $12,919          $488           $2,646        $3,494          $6,291         $15,912    $1,379      $3,335      $2,008      $9,190        

Operating leases

   399       66        107         80           146          383     66       113       77       127        

Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves (b)

   26,505       6,152        7,607         3,910           8,836          25,630     5,939       7,458       3,816       8,417        

Future policy benefits reserves (c)

   35,607       153        449         726           34,279          37,749     205       583       826       36,135        

Policyholders’ funds reserves (c)

   133       26        15         (1)          93          86     30       5       (1)      52        

Rig construction contracts (d)

   1,766       928        838            

Rig construction contracts

   2,089     1,254       835        

Purchase and other obligations

   451       236        198         15           2          343     135       180       17       11        

 

 

Total (e)

  $  77,780          $    8,049           $  11,860        $    8,224          $  49,647       

Total (d)

  $  82,192    $    9,008      $  12,509      $    6,743      $  53,932        

 

 

 

(a)

Includes estimated future interest payments.

(b)

Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves are not discounted and represent CNA’s estimate of the amount and timing of the ultimate settlement and administration of gross claims based on its assessment of facts and circumstances known as of December 31, 2012.2013. See the Reserves - Estimates and Uncertainties section of this MD&A for further information.

(c)

Future policy benefits and policyholders’ funds reserves are not discounted and represent CNA’s estimate of the ultimate amount and timing of the settlement of benefits based on its assessment of facts and circumstances known as of December 31, 2012.2013. Future policy benefit reserves of $697$673 million and policyholders’ fund reserves of $35$34 million related to business which has been 100% ceded to unaffiliated parties in connection with the sale of CNA’s individual life business in 2004 are not included. Additional information on future policy benefits and policyholders’ funds reserves is included in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

(d)

Diamond Offshore has entered into four turnkey contracts for the construction of four ultra-deepwater drillships with deliveries scheduled in 2013 and 2014. The aggregate cost of the four drillships is expected to be approximately $2.6 billion, of which $648 million has been paid. The final installments of the contracted price are payable upon delivery of each vessel. Diamond Offshore has also entered into construction contracts to upgrade two existing rigs. The upgrades are expected to be completed in 2013 and 2014 at an aggregate cost of approximately $680 million, of which $93 million has been paid.

(e)

Does not include expected contribution of approximately $100$64 million to the Company’s pension and postretirement plans in 2013.2014.

Further information on our commitments, contingencies and guarantees is provided in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

INVESTMENTS

Investment activities of non-insurance subsidiaries primarily include investments in fixed income securities, including short term investments. The Parent Company portfolio also includes equity securities, including short sales and derivative instruments, and investments in limited partnerships. These types of investments generally present greater volatility, less liquidity and greater risk than fixed income investments and are included within Results of Operations – Corporate and Other.

We enter into short sales and invest in certain derivative instruments that are used for asset and liability management activities, income enhancements to our portfolio management strategy and to benefit from anticipated future movements in the underlying markets. If such movements do not occur as anticipated, then significant losses may occur. Monitoring procedures include senior management review of daily detailed reports of existing positions and valuation fluctuations to ensure that open positions are consistent with our portfolio strategy.

Credit exposure associated with non-performance by the counterparties to derivative instruments is generally limited to the uncollateralized change in fair value of the derivative instruments recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We mitigate the risk of non-performance by monitoring the creditworthiness of counterparties and diversifying derivatives to multiple counterparties. We occasionally require collateral from our derivative investment counterparties depending on the amount of the exposure and the credit rating of the counterparty.

Insurance

CNA maintains a large portfolio of fixed maturity and equity securities, including large amounts of corporate and government issued debt securities, residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, and other asset-backed securities and investments in limited partnerships which pursue a variety of long and short investment strategies across a broad array of asset classes. CNA’s investment portfolio supports its obligation to pay future insurance claims and provides investment returns which are an important part of CNA’s overall profitability.

Net Investment Income

The significant components of CNA’s net investment income are presented in the following table:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012   2011   2010       2013   2012   2011 

 

 
(In millions)                        

Fixed maturity securities

  $2,022    $2,011    $2,051         $      1,998     $      2,022     $      2,011       

Short term investments

   5     8     15                    8       

Limited partnership investments

   251     48     249          451      251      48       

Equity securities

   12     20     32          12      12      20       

Trading portfolio

   24     9     13          17      24      9       

Other

   24     16     10          25      24      16       

 

 

Gross investment income

   2,338     2,112     2,370          2,506      2,338      2,112       

Investment expenses

   (56   (58   (54)      

Investment expense

   (56)     (56)     (58)      

 

 

Net investment income

  $      2,282    $      2,054    $    2,316         $2,450     $2,282     $2,054       

 

 

Net investment income increased $168 million for 2013 as compared with 2012. The increase was primarily driven by a significant increase in limited partnership investment income, partially offset by a decrease in fixed maturity securities income. Limited partnership results were positively impacted by more favorable equity market returns. The decrease in fixed maturity securities income was due to the effect of reinvesting at lower market interest rates, partially offset by a higher invested asset base.

Net investment income increased $228 million for 2012 as compared with 2011. The increase was primarily driven by a significant increase in limited partnership investment income, increased trading portfolio income and an increase in fixed maturity securities income. Limited partnership results were positively impacted by more favorable equity market returns, and overall capital market and credit spread volatility. The increase in fixed maturity securities income was driven by a higher invested asset base and a favorable net impact of changes in estimates of prepayments for asset-backed securities. These favorable impacts were partially offset by the effect of purchasing new investments at lower market interest rates.

Net investment income decreased $262 million in 2011 as compared with 2010. The decrease was primarily driven by a significant decrease in limited partnership results as well as lower fixed maturity security income. Limited partnership results were adversely impacted by less favorable equity market returns, and overall capital

market and credit spread volatility. The decrease in fixed maturity security income was primarily driven by the effect of purchasing new investmentsinvesting at lower market interest rates.

The fixed maturity investment portfolio provided a pretax effective income yield of 5.3%5.1%, 5.5%5.3% and 5.6%5.5% for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011, and 2010.2011. Tax-exempt municipal bonds generated $317 million, $274 million $240 million and $263$240 million of net investment income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)

The components of CNA’s net realized investment results are presented in the following table:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012   2011   2010       2013   2012   2011 

 

 
(In millions)                        

Realized investment gains (losses):

            

Fixed maturity securities:

            

Corporate and other bonds

  $        106    $        48    $        164         $          55     $        106     $          48       

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

   (4   5     (128)         36      (4)     5       

Asset-backed

   (26   (82   44          (39)     (26)     (82)      

U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises

   3     1     3                 1       

Foreign government

   4     3     2                    3       

Redeemable preferred stock

     3     7          (1)       3       

 

 

Total fixed maturity securities

   83     (22   92          55      83      (22)      

Equity securities

   (23   (1   (2)         (22)     (23)     (1)      

Derivative securities

   (2     (1)         (9)     (2)    

Short term investments and other

   2     4     (3)                   4       

 

 

Total realized investment gains (losses)

   60     (19   86          27      60      (19)      

Income tax (expense) benefit

   (21   8     (36)         (9)     (21)     8       

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (4   1     (4)         (2)     (4)     1       

 

 

Net realized investment gains (losses) attributable to Loews Corporation

  $35    $(10  $46         $16     $35     $(10)      

 

 

Net realized investment gains increased $45decreased $19 million for 20122013 as compared with 2011,2012, driven by lower net realized investment gains on sales of securities, partially offset by lower other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses recognized in earnings. Net realized investment gains decreased $56increased $45 million for 20112012 as compared with 2010. Net realized investment results include OTTI losses of $100 million, $140 million and $151 million for 2012, 2011 and 2010.2011. Further information on CNA’s realized gains and losses, including CNA’s OTTI losses and impairment decision process, is set forth in NoteNotes 1 and 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

Portfolio Quality

CNA’s fixed maturity portfolio consists primarily of high quality bonds, 91.6%92.1% and 92.1%91.6% of which were rated as investment grade (rated BBB- or higher) at December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012. The classification between investment grade and non-investment grade is based on a ratings methodology that takes into account ratings from two major providers, Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”)&P and Moody’s, Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”), in that order of preference. If a security is not rated by these providers,agencies, CNA formulates an internal rating. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, approximately 99% and 2011, approximately 98% of the fixed maturity portfolio was rated by S&P or Moody’s, or was issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, Government agencies or Government-sponsored enterprises.

The following table summarizes the ratings of CNA’s fixed maturity portfolio at fair value:

 

December 31  2012     2011   2013     2012 

 

 
(In millions of dollars)                                        

U.S. Government, Government agencies and Government-sponsored enterprises

  $4,540         10.6%        $4,760         11.9%         $3,683     8.9%      $4,540     10.6%        

AAA

   3,224         7.6             3,421         8.6             2,776     6.7           3,224     7.6           

AA and A

   19,305         45.3             17,807         44.6             20,353     49.4           19,305     45.3           

BBB

   11,997         28.1             10,790         27.0             11,171     27.1           11,997     28.1           

Non-investment grade

   3,567         8.4             3,159         7.9             3,250     7.9           3,567     8.4           

 

 

Total

  $  42,633         100.0%        $  39,937         100.0%         $      41,233             100.0%      $        42,633           100.0%        

 

 

Non-investment grade fixed maturity securities, as presented in the table below, include high-yield securities rated below BBB- by bond rating agencies and other unrated securities that, according to CNA’s analysis, are below investment grade. Non-investment grade securities generally involve a greater degree of risk than investment grade securities. The amortized cost of CNA’s non-investment grade fixed maturity bond portfolio was $3.4$3.1 billion and $3.2$3.4 billion at December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012. The following table summarizes the ratings of this portfolio at fair value.value:

 

December 31  2012     2011   2013     2012 

 

 
(In millions of dollars)                                        

BB

  $1,529         42.9%        $1,484         47.0%         $1,393     42.9%       $1,529     42.9%        

B

   1,075         30.1             867         27.4             967     29.8            1,075     30.1           

CCC - C

   724         20.3             689         21.8             649     20.0            724     20.3           

D

   239         6.7             119         3.8             241     7.3            239     6.7           

 

 

Total

  $    3,567         100.0%        $    3,159         100.0%         $        3,250             100.0%       $          3,567           100.0%        

 

 

The following table summarizes available-for-sale fixed maturity securities in a gross unrealized loss position by ratings distribution.distribution:

 

December 31, 2012  Estimated
Fair Value
     %     Gross
Unrealized
Losses
     %     
December 31, 2013  Estimated
Fair Value
   %     Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   %     

 

 
(In millions of dollars)                                    

U.S. Government, Government agencies and Government-sponsored enterprises

  $642         23.9%     $45         29.1%        $1,244     12.8%       $78     14.8%       

AAA

   172         6.4          3         1.9             711     7.3            33     6.3           

AA

   387         14.4          41         26.5             2,282     23.5            192     36.4           

A

   323         12.0          12         7.7             2,302     23.7            94     17.8           

BBB

   551         20.5          22         14.2             2,526     26.0            104     19.7           

Non-investment grade

   610         22.8          32         20.6             648     6.7            27     5.0           

 

 

Total

  $2,685         100.0%     $155         100.0%        $        9,713             100.0%       $             528           100.0%       

 

 

The following table provides the maturity profile for these available-for-sale fixed maturity securities. Securities not due to mature on a single date are allocated based on weighted average life.life:

 

December 31, 2012  Estimated
Fair Value
     %       Gross
Unrealized
Losses
     %   �� 
December 31, 2013  

Estimated

Fair Value

     %     Gross
Unrealized
Losses
     % 

 

 
(In millions of dollars)                                            

Due in one year or less

  $213         7.9%          $8       5.2%       $186       1.9%      $2       0.4%     

Due after one year through five years

   913         34.0           22       14.2            1,252       12.9           32       6.1         

Due after five years through ten years

   865         32.2           72       46.5            4,326       44.5           186       35.2         

Due after ten years

   694         25.9           53       34.1            3,949       40.7           308       58.3         

 

 

Total

  $2,685         100.0%          $155       100.0%       $      9,713       100.0%      $        528       100.0%     

 

 

Duration

A primary objective in the management of the investment portfolio is to optimize return relative to corresponding liabilities and respective liquidity needs. CNA’s views on the current interest rate environment, tax regulations, asset class valuations, specific security issuer and broader industry segment conditions, and the domestic and global economic conditions, are some of the factors that enter into an investment decision. CNA also continually monitors exposure to issuers of securities held and broader industry sector exposures and may from time to time adjust such exposures based on its views of a specific issuer or industry sector.

A further consideration in the management of the investment portfolio is the characteristics of the corresponding liabilities and the ability to align the duration of the portfolio to those liabilities and to meet future liquidity needs, minimize interest rate risk and maintain a level of income sufficient to support the underlying insurance liabilities. For portfolios where future liability cash flows are determinable and typically long term in nature, CNA segregates investments for asset/liability management purposes. The segregated investments support the liabilities in Life & Group Non-Core including annuities, structured settlements and long term care products.

The effective durations of fixed maturity securities, short term investments and interest rate derivatives are presented in the table below. Short term investments are net of accounts payable and receivable amounts for securities purchased and sold, but not yet settled.

 

              December 31, 2012         December 31, 2011     December 31, 2013     December 31, 2012 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
    Fair Value   Effective
Duration
(Years)
       Fair Value     Effective      
Duration      
(Years)      
   Fair Value     Effective
Duration
(Years)
     Fair Value     Effective        
Duration        
(Years)        
 

 

 
(In millions of dollars)                                          

Investments supporting Life & Group Non-Core

   $    15,590             11.3          $  13,820          11.5            

Investments supporting Life & Group

              

Non-Core

  $15,009         11.3        $15,590         11.3              

Other interest sensitive investments

   28,855             3.9           28,071          3.9               27,766         4.4         28,855         3.9              

 

 

Total

   $    44,445             6.5          $41,891          6.4              $    42,775         6.9        $    44,445         6.5              

 

 

The investment portfolio is periodically analyzed for changes in duration and related price change risk. Additionally, CNA periodically reviews the sensitivity of the portfolio to the level of foreign exchange rates and other factors that contribute to market price changes. A summary of these risks and specific analysis on changes is included in Item 7A – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk included herein.

Short Term Investments

The carrying value of the components of CNA’s short term investment portfolio is presented in the following table:

 

December 31  2012     2011       2013     2012       

 

 
(In millions)                    

Short term investments:

            

Commercial paper

  $751      $411          $549      $751        

U.S. Treasury securities

   617       903           636       617        

Money market funds

   301       45           94       301        

Other

   163       282           128       163        

 

 

Total short term investments

  $      1,832      $      1,641          $      1,407      $      1,832        

 

 

European Exposure

CNA’s fixed maturity portfolio includes European exposure. The following table summarizes European exposure included within fixed maturity holdings:

   Corporate  Sovereign  Total 
  

 

 

 
December 31, 2012   Financial Sector  Other Sectors       

 

 
(In millions)             

AAA

    $224       $77    $118   $419     

AA

   227        128     35    390     

A

   878        796     6    1,680     

BBB

   386        1,109     6    1,501     

Non-investment grade

   15        193      208     

 

 

Total fair value

    $1,730       $2,303    $165   $4,198     

 

 

Total amortized cost

    $1,615       $2,027    $            161   $            3,803     

 

 

European exposure is based on application of a country of risk methodology. Country of risk is derived from the issuing entity’s management location, country of primary listing, revenue and reporting currency. As of December 31, 2012, securities with a fair value and amortized cost of $2.0 billion and $1.8 billion relate to Eurozone countries, which consist of member states of the European Union that use the Euro as their national currency. Of this amount, securities with a fair value and amortized cost of $324 million and $298 million pertain to Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal and Spain.

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATE

For a discussion of accounting standards updates that have been adopted or will be adopted in the future, please read Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Investors are cautioned that certain statements contained in this Report as well as some statements in periodic press releases and some oral statements made by our officials and our subsidiaries during presentations about us, are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may project, indicate or imply future results, events, performance or achievements, and may contain the words “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. In addition, any statement concerning future financial performance (including future revenues, earnings or growth rates), ongoing business strategies or prospects, and possible actions taken by us or our subsidiaries, which may be provided by management are also forward-looking statements as defined by the Act.

Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and projections about future events and are inherently subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated or projected. These risks and uncertainties include, among others:

Risks and uncertainties primarily affecting us and our insurance subsidiaries

 

  

the risks and uncertainties associated with CNA’s loss reserves, as outlined under “Results of Operations by Business Segment – CNA Financial – Reserves – Estimates and Uncertainties” in this MD&A, including the sufficiency of the reserves and the possibility for future increases, which would be reflected in the results of operations in the period that the need for such adjustment is determined;

 

  

the risk that the other parties to the transaction in which, subject to certain limitations, CNA ceded its legacy A&EP liabilities will not fully perform their obligations to CNA, the uncertainty in estimating loss reserves for A&EP liabilities and the possible continued exposure of CNA to liabilities for A&EP claims that are not covered under the terms of the transaction;

 

  

the performance of reinsurance companies under reinsurance contracts with CNA;

 

  

the impact of competitive products, policies and pricing and the competitive environment in which CNA operates, including changes in CNA’s book of business;

 

  

product and policy availability and demand and market responses, including the level of ability to obtain rate increases and decline or non-renew underpriced accounts, to achieve premium targets and profitability and to realize growth and retention estimates;

 

  

general economic and business conditions, including recessionary conditions that may decrease the size and number of CNA’s insurance customers and create additional losses to CNA’s lines of business, especially those that provide management and professional liability insurance, as well as surety bonds, to businesses

engaged in real estate, financial services and professional services, and inflationary pressures on medical care costs, construction costs and other economic sectors that increase the severity of claims;

 

  

conditions in the capital and credit markets, including continuing uncertainty and instability in these markets, as well as the overall economy, and their impact on the returns, types, liquidity and valuation of CNA’s investments;

 

  

conditions in the capital and credit markets that may limit CNA’s ability to raise significant amounts of capital on favorable terms, as well as restrictions on the ability or willingness of the Company to provide additional capital support to CNA;terms;

 

  

the possibility of changes in CNA’s ratings by ratings agencies, including the inability to access certain markets or distribution channels, and the required collateralization of future payment obligations as a result of such changes, and changes in rating agency policies and practices;

  

regulatory limitations, impositions and restrictions upon CNA, including the effects of assessments and other surcharges for guaranty funds and second-injury funds, other mandatory pooling arrangements and future assessments levied on insurance companies as well as the new federal financial regulatory reform of the insurance industry established by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act;

increased operating costs and underwriting losses arising from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the related amendments in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, as well as health care reform proposals at the state level;companies;

 

  

regulatory limitations and restrictions, including limitations upon CNA’s ability to receive dividends from its insurance subsidiaries imposed by regulatory authorities, including regulatory capital adequacy standards;

 

  

weather and other natural physical events, including the severity and frequency of storms, hail, snowfall and other winter conditions, natural disasters such as hurricanes and earthquakes, as well as climate change, including effects on global weather patterns, greenhouse gases, sea, land and air temperatures, sea levels, rain, hail and snow;

 

  

regulatory requirements imposed by coastal state regulators in the wake of hurricanes or other natural disasters, including limitations on the ability to exit markets or to non-renew, cancel or change terms and conditions in policies, as well as mandatory assessments to fund any shortfalls arising from the inability of quasi-governmental insurers to pay claims;

 

  

man-made disasters, including the possible occurrence of terrorist attacks and the effect of the absence or insufficiency of applicable terrorism legislation on coverages;

 

  

the unpredictability of the nature, targets, severity or frequency of potential terrorist events, as well as the uncertainty as to CNA’s ability to contain its terrorism exposure effectively; and

 

  

the occurrence of epidemics.

Risks and uncertainties primarily affecting us and our energy subsidiaries

 

  

the impact of changes in worldwide demand for oil and natural gas and oil and gas price fluctuations on E&P activity, including possible write-downs of the carrying value of natural gas and NGL properties and impairments of goodwill and reduced demand for offshore drilling services;

 

  

the continuing effects of the Macondo well blowout, including, without limitation, the impact on drilling in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, related delays in permitting activities and related regulations and market developments;blowout;

 

  

timing and cost of completion of rig upgrades, construction projects and other capital projects, including delivery dates and drilling contracts;

 

  

changes in foreign and domestic oil and gas exploration, development and production activity;

 

  

risks of international operations, compliance with foreign laws and taxation policies and seizure, expropriation, nationalization, deprivation, malicious damage or nationalizationother loss of possession or use of equipment and assets;

  

government policies regarding exploration and development of oil and gas reserves;

 

  

market conditions in the offshore oil and gas drilling industry, including utilization levels and dayrates;

 

  

timing and duration of required regulatory inspections for offshore oil and gas drilling rigs;

 

  

the worldwide political and military environment, including for example, in oil-producing regions and locations where Diamond Offshore’s offshore drilling rigs are operating or are under construction;

the risk of physical damage to rigs and equipment caused by named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico;

  

the availability, cost limits and adequacy of insurance and indemnification;

 

  

the impact of new pipelines or new gas supply sources on competition and basis spreads on Boardwalk Pipeline’s pipeline systems, which may impact its ability to maintain or replace expiring gas transportation and storage contracts and to sell short term capacity on its pipelines;

 

  

the costs of maintaining and ensuring the integrity and reliability of Boardwalk Pipeline’s pipeline systems;

 

  

the impact of current and future environmental laws and regulations and exposure to environmental liabilities including matters related to global climate change;

 

  

regulatory issues affecting natural gas transmission, including ratemaking and other proceedings particularly affecting Boardwalk Pipeline’s gas transmission subsidiaries;

 

  

the timing, cost, scope and financial performance of Boardwalk Pipeline’s recent, current and future acquisitions and growth projects, including the expansion into new product lines and geographical areas; and

 

  

the development of additional natural gas reserves and changes in reserve estimates.

Risks and uncertainties affecting us and our subsidiaries generally

 

  

general economic and business conditions;

 

  

risks of war, military operations, other armed hostilities, terrorist acts or embargoes;

 

  

potential changes in accounting policies by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission or regulatory agencies for any of our subsidiaries’ industries which may cause us or our subsidiaries to revise their financial accounting and/or disclosures in the future, and which may change the way analysts measure our and our subsidiaries’ business or financial performance;

 

  

the impact of regulatory initiatives and compliance with governmental regulations, judicial rulings and jury verdicts;

 

  

the results of financing efforts; by us and our subsidiaries, including any additional investments by us in our subsidiaries;subsidiaries and the ability of us and our subsidiaries to access bank and capital markets to refinance indebtedness and fund capital needs;

 

  

the ability of customers and suppliers to meet their obligations to us and our subsidiaries;

 

  

the successful negotiation, consummation and completion of contemplated transactions, projects and agreements, including obtaining necessary regulatory approvals, and the timing cost, scope and financial performance of any such transactions, projects and agreements;

 

  

the successful integration, transition and management of acquired businesses;

  

the outcome of pending or future litigation, including any tobacco-related suits to which we are or may become a party;

 

  

possible casualty losses;

 

  

the availability of indemnification by Lorillard and its subsidiaries for any tobacco-related liabilities that we may incur as a result of tobacco-related lawsuits or otherwise, as provided in the Separation Agreement; and

 

  

potential future asset impairments.

Developments in any of these or other areas of risk and uncertainty, which are more fully described elsewhere in this Report and our other filings with the SEC, could cause our results to differ materially from results that have

been or may be anticipated or projected. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report and we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to update these statements to reflect any change in our expectations or beliefs or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any forward-looking statement is based.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

We are a large diversified holding company. As such, we and our subsidiaries have significant amounts of financial instruments that involve market risk. Our measure of market risk exposure represents an estimate of the change in fair value of our financial instruments. Changes in the trading portfolio are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Market risk exposure is presented for each class of financial instrument held by us at December 31, assuming immediate adverse market movements of the magnitude described below. We believe that the various rates of adverse market movements represent a measure of exposure to loss under hypothetically assumed adverse conditions. The estimated market risk exposure represents the hypothetical loss to future earnings and does not represent the maximum possible loss nor any expected actual loss, even under adverse conditions, because actual adverse fluctuations would likely differ. In addition, since our investment portfolio is subject to change based on our portfolio management strategy as well as in response to changes in the market, these estimates are not necessarily indicative of the actual results which may occur.

Exposure to market risk is managed and monitored by senior management. Senior management approves our overall investment strategy and has responsibility to ensure that the investment positions are consistent with that strategy with an acceptable level of risk. We may manage risk by buying or selling instruments or entering into offsetting positions.

Interest Rate Risk – We have exposure to interest rate risk arising from changes in the level or volatility of interest rates. We attempt to mitigate our exposure to interest rate risk by utilizing instruments such as interest rate swaps, commitments to purchase securities, options, futures and forwards. We monitor our sensitivity to interest rate changes by revaluing financial assets and liabilities using a variety of different interest rates. The Company uses duration and convexity at the security level to estimate the change in fair value that would result from a change in each security’s yield. Duration measures the price sensitivity of an asset to changes in the yield rate. Convexity measures how the duration of the asset changes with interest rates. The duration and convexity analysis takes into account the unique characteristics (e.g., call and put options and prepayment expectations) of each security, in determining the hypothetical change in fair value. The analysis is performed at the security level and is aggregated up to the asset category level.

The evaluation is performed by applying an instantaneous change in the yield rates by varying magnitudes on a static balance sheet to determine the effect such a change in rates would have on the recorded market value of our investments and the resulting effect on shareholders’ equity. The analysis presents the sensitivity of the market value of our financial instruments to selected changes in market rates and prices which we believe are reasonably possible over a one year period.

The sensitivity analysis estimates the change in the fair value of our interest sensitive assets and liabilities that were held on December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 due to an instantaneous change in the yield of the security at the end of the period of 100 basis points, with all other variables held constant.

The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Accordingly, the analysis may not be indicative of, is not intended to provide, and does not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes of market interest rates on our earnings or shareholders’ equity. Further, the computations do not contemplate any actions we could undertake in response to changes in interest rates.

Our debt is denominated in U.S. Dollars and has been primarily issued at fixed rates, therefore, interest expense would not be impacted by interest rate shifts. The impact of a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on fixed rate debt would result in a decrease in market value of $498$616 million and $455$498 million at December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012. The impact of a 100 basis point decrease would result in an increase in market value of $543$698 million and $505$543 million at December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012. HighMount has entered into interest rate swaps for a notional amount of

$300 $300 million to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in LIBOR on a portion of its $600$500 million variable rate credit facility. These swaps effectively fix the interest rate at an effective rate of 3.4%3.6%. At December 31, 2012,2013, the impact of a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on variable rate debt would increase interest expense by approximately $9$6 million on an annual basis.

Equity Price Risk – We have exposure to equity price risk as a result of our investment in equity securities and equity derivatives. Equity price risk results from changes in the level or volatility of equity prices which affect the value of equity securities or instruments that derive their value from such securities or indexes. Equity price risk was measured assuming an instantaneous 25% decrease in the underlying reference price or index from its level at December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, with all other variables held constant. A model was developed to analyze the observed changes in the value of limited partnerships held by the Company over a multiple year period along with the corresponding changes in various equity indices. The result of the model allowed us to estimate the change in value of limited partnerships when equity markets decline by 25%.

Foreign Exchange Rate Risk – Foreign exchange rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in foreign currency exchange rates will impact the value of financial instruments. We have foreign exchange rate exposure when we buy or sell foreign currencies or financial instruments denominated in a foreign currency, which is reduced through the use of forward contracts. Our foreign transactions are primarily denominated in Australian dollars, Canadian dollars, British pounds, Brazilian reais, and the European Monetary Unit.Unit, Mexican pesos and Norwegian kroner. The sensitivity analysis assumes an instantaneous 20% decrease in the foreign currency exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar from their levels at December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, with all other variables held constant.

Commodity Price Risk – We have exposure to price risk as a result of our investments in commodities. Commodity price risk results from changes in the level or volatility of commodity prices that impact instruments which derive their value from such commodities. Commodity price risk was measured assuming an instantaneous increase of 20% from their levels at December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012. The impact of a change in commodity prices on the Company’s non-trading commodity-based financial derivative instruments at a point in time is not necessarily representative of the results that will be realized when such contracts are ultimately settled. Net losses from commodity derivative instruments used for hedging purposes, to the extent realized, will generally be offset by recognition of the underlying hedged transaction, such as revenue from sales.

Credit Risk – We are exposed to credit risk relating to the risk of loss resulting from the nonperformance by a customer of its contractual obligations. Although nearly all of the Company’s customers pay for its services on a timely basis, the Company actively monitors the credit exposure to its customers. Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries may perform credit reviews of customers and may require customers to provide cash collateral, post a letter of credit, prepay for services or provide other credit enhancements.

The following tables present our market risk by category (equity prices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices) on the basis of those entered into for trading purposes and other than trading purposes.

Trading portfolio:

 

Category of risk exposure:  Fair Value Asset (Liability)    Market Risk            Fair Value Asset (Liability)   Market Risk 

 

 
December 31  2012       2011     2012         2011               2013         2012           2013           2012         

 

 
(In millions)                              

Equity prices (1):

                 

Equity securities – long

   $       630       $       590      $      (158    $      (148)            $645        $630     $(161)    $(158)      

– short

   (7)      (9    2      2            (17)    (7)          2       

Options – purchased

   19       33      23      18            41     19      155      23       

– written

   (14)      (23    (42    (2)           (23)    (14)     (55)     (42)      

Interest rate (2):

                 

Fixed maturities – long

   161       109      5      (3)           123     161      (3)     5       

– short

   (77)         (7       (77)       (7)      

Short term investments

   2,526       2,092           3,261     2,526       

Other derivatives

   (3)      8      (3    (3)           (3)    (3)     (3)     (3)      

 

Note:

The calculation of estimated market risk exposure is based on assumed adverse changes in the underlying reference price or index of (1) a decrease in equity prices of 25% and (2) a decreasean increase in yield rates of 100 basis points. Adverse changes on options which differ from those presented above would not necessarily result in a proportionate change to the estimated market risk exposure.

Other than trading portfolio:

 

Category of risk exposure:  Fair Value Asset (Liability)    Market Risk   Fair Value Asset (Liability)   Market Risk 

 

 
December 31  2012       2011     2012     2011                2013               2012             2013             2012           

 

 
(In millions)                                

Equity prices (1):

                  

Equity securities:

                  

General accounts (a)

   $         249       $         304      $       (62    $       (76)           $185       $249      $(46)      $(62)      

Limited partnership investments

   3,090       2,711      (295    (242)          3,420      3,090      (447)     (295)      

Interest rate (2):

                  

Fixed maturities (a)

   42,604       39,931      (2,818    (2,614)          41,197      42,604          (2,808)     (2,818)      

Short term investments (a)

   3,309       3,013      (3    (11)          3,539      3,309      (2)     (3)      

Other invested assets, primarily mortgage loans

   418       258      (18    (11)          515      418      (24)     (18)      

Interest rate swaps and other (b)

   (6)         10      13        

Other derivative securities

   (3)      (1      

Interest rate swaps (b)

   (4)     (6)          10       

Other derivatives

     (3)      

Separate accounts:

                  

Fixed maturities

   288       381      (4    (15)          149      288      (2)     (4)      

Short term investments

   21       32           28      21       

Foreign exchange (3):

                  

Forwards – short

   4       (7    (27    (26)                    (20)     (27)      

Other invested assets

   59          (11      54      59      (7)     (11)      

Commodities (4):

                  

Forwards – short (b)

   36       42      (48    (43)               36      (38)     (48)      

 

 

 

Note:

The calculation of estimated market risk exposure is based on assumed adverse changes in the underlying reference price or index of (1) a decrease in equity prices of 25%, (2) an increase in yield rates of 100 basis points, (3) a decrease in the foreign currency exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar of 20% and (4) an increase in commodity prices of 20%.

 

(a)

Certain securities are denominated in foreign currencies. An assumed 20% decline in the underlying exchange rates would result in an aggregate foreign currency exchange rate risk of $(490)$(482) and $(382)$(490) at December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012.

 

(b)

The market risk at December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 will generally be offset by recognition of the underlying hedged transaction.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data are comprised of the following sections:

 

           Page     
No.
 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

   99          

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   100          

Consolidated Balance Sheets

   102          

Consolidated Statements of Income

   104          

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

   106          

Consolidated Statements of Equity

   107          

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   109          

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements:

   111          

1.

  

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

   111          

2.

  

Acquisition/Divestitures

   119          

3.

  

Investments

   120          

4.

  

Fair Value

   126          

5.

  

Derivative Financial Instruments

   134          

6.

  

Receivables

   135          

7.

  

Property, Plant and Equipment

   135          

8.

  

Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves

   137          

9.

  

Leases

   144          

10.

  

Income Taxes

   145          

11.

  

Debt

   148          

12.

  

Shareholders’ Equity

   150          

13.

  

Statutory Accounting Practices

   151          

14.

  

Supplemental Natural Gas and Oil Information (Unaudited)

   152          

15.

  

Benefit Plans

   155          

16.

  

Reinsurance

   163          

17.

  

Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

   165          

18.

  

Legal Proceedings

   165          

19.

  

Commitments and Contingencies

   166          

20.

  

Business Segments

   166          

21.

  

Consolidating Financial Information

   170          
            Page     
No.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

  103

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  104

Consolidated Balance Sheets

  106

Consolidated Statements of Income

  108

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

  109

Consolidated Statements of Equity

  110

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

  112

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements:

  114
 

1.

 

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

  114
 

2.

 

Acquisitions/Divestiture

  123
 

3.

 

Investments

  124
 

4.

 

Fair Value

  129
 

5.

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

  137
 

6.

 

Receivables

  138
 

7.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment

  138
 

8.

 

Goodwill

  140
 

9.

 

Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves

  141
 

10.

 

Leases

  148
 

11.

 

Income Taxes

  148
 

12.

 

Debt

  152
 

13.

 

Shareholders’ Equity

  155
 

14.

 

Statutory Accounting Practices

  156
 

15.

 

Supplemental Natural Gas and Oil Information (Unaudited)

  157
 

16.

 

Benefit Plans

  161
 

17.

 

Reinsurance

  168
 

18.

 

Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

  170
 

19.

 

Legal Proceedings

  170
 

20.

 

Commitments and Contingencies

  171
 

21.

 

Business Segments

  172
 

22.

 

Consolidating Financial Information

  175
 

23.

 

Subsequent Event

  181

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for us. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any control system, however well designed, including the possibility of human error and the possible circumvention or overriding of controls. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Management must make judgments with respect to the relative cost and expected benefits of any specific control measure. The design of a control system also is based in part upon assumptions and judgments made by management about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that a control will be effective under all potential future conditions. As a result, even an effective system of internal control over financial reporting can provide no more than reasonable assurance with respect to the fair presentation of financial statements and the processes under which they were prepared.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012.2013. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (1992). Based on this assessment, our management believes that, as of December 31, 2012,2013, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued an audit report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The report of Deloitte & Touche LLP follows this Report.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Loews Corporation

New York, NY

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Loews Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012,2013, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2013, based on the criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 20122013 of the Company and our report dated February 22, 201324, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the change of accounting for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts in 2012.schedules.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, NY

February 22, 2013

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, NY
February 24, 2014

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Loews Corporation

New York, NY

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Loews Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012.2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Loews Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012,2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company changed its accounting for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts in 2012.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2013, based on the criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 22, 201324, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, NY

February 22, 2013

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, NY
February 24, 2014

Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

Assets:

              

 

 
December 31  2012          2011       2013       2012       

 

 
(Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data)                   

Investments:

          

Fixed maturities, amortized cost of $38,324 and $37,466

  $42,765      $40,040       

Fixed maturities, amortized cost of $39,426 and $38,324

  $41,320        $42,765       

Equity securities, cost of $893 and $902

   898       927       

Equity securities, cost of $881 and $893

   871         898       

Limited partnership investments

   3,090       2,711          3,420         3,090       

Other invested assets, primarily mortgage loans

   460       245          562         460       

Short term investments

   5,835       5,105          6,800         5,835       

 

 

Total investments

   53,048       49,028          52,973         53,048       

Cash

   228       129          295         228       

Receivables

   9,366       9,259          9,361         9,366       

Property, plant and equipment

   13,935       13,618          14,498         13,935       

Goodwill

   996       908          357         996       

Other assets

   1,538       1,357          1,650         1,538       

Deferred acquisition costs of insurance subsidiaries

   598       552          624         598       

Separate account business

   312       417          181         312       

 

 

Total assets

  $    80,021      $    75,268         $    79,939        $    80,021       

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

Liabilities and Equity:

Liabilities and Equity:

  

        

 

 

December 31

  2012     2011        2013       2012       

 

 
(Dollar amounts in millions, except per share data)                

Insurance reserves:

         

Claim and claim adjustment expense

  $24,763     $24,303         $    24,089        $    24,763       

Future policy benefits

   11,475      9,810          10,471         11,475       

Unearned premiums

   3,610      3,250          3,718         3,610       

Policyholders’ funds

   157      191          116         157       

 

 

Total insurance reserves

   40,005      37,554          38,394         40,005       

Payable to brokers

   205      162          143         205       

Short term debt

   19      88          840         19       

Long term debt

   9,191      8,913          10,006         9,191       

Deferred incomes taxes

   840      622          716         840       

Other liabilities

   4,773      4,309          4,753         4,773       

Separate account business

   312      417          181         312       

 

 

Total liabilities

   55,345      52,065          55,033         55,345       

 

 

Commitments and contingent liabilities

         

Shareholders’ equity:

         

Preferred stock, $0.10 par value:

         

Authorized – 100,000,000 shares

         

Common stock, $0.01 par value:

         

Authorized – 1,800,000,000 shares

         

Issued – 392,054,766 and 396,585,226 shares

   4      4       

Issued – 387,210,096 and 392,054,766 shares

   4         4       

Additional paid-in capital

   3,595      3,494          3,607         3,595       

Retained earnings

   15,192      14,890          15,508         15,192       

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   678      384          339         678       

 

 
   19,469      18,772          19,458         19,469       

Less treasury stock, at cost (249,600 shares)

   (10      -         (10)      

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   19,459      18,772          19,458         19,459       

Noncontrolling interests

   5,217      4,431          5,448         5,217       

 

 

Total equity

   24,676      23,203          24,906         24,676       

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

  $    80,021     $    75,268         $79,939        $80,021       

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

 

Year Ended December 31  2012    2011    2010         2013     2012     2011       

 

 
(In millions, except per share data)                        

Revenues:

              

Insurance premiums

  $    6,882     $    6,603     $    6,515          $7,271     $6,882     $6,603       

Net investment income

   2,349      2,063      2,508           2,593      2,349      2,063       

Investment gains (losses):

              

Other-than-temporary impairment losses

   (129    (175    (254)          (76)     (129)     (175)      

Portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in Other comprehensive income

   (25    (41    22        

Portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss)

   (2)     (25)     (41)      

 

 

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

   (154    (216    (232)          (78)     (154)     (216)      

Other net investment gains

   211      164      288           104      211      164       

 

 

Total investment gains (losses)

   57      (52    56           26      57      (52)      

Contract drilling revenues

   2,936      3,254      3,230           2,844      2,936      3,254       

Other

   2,328      2,261      2,306           2,319      2,328      2,261       

 

 

Total

   14,552      14,129      14,615               15,053          14,552          14,129       

 

 

Expenses:

              

Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits

   5,896      5,489      4,985           5,947      5,896      5,489       

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

   1,274      1,176      1,168           1,362      1,274      1,176       

Contract drilling expenses

   1,537      1,549      1,391           1,573      1,537      1,549       

Other operating expenses (Notes 7 and 8)

   4,006      3,167      3,652        

Other operating expenses (Note 7)

   3,664      4,006      3,167       

Impairment of goodwill

   636       

Interest

   440      522      517           442      440      522       

 

 

Total

   13,153      11,903      11,713           13,624      13,153      11,903       

 

 

Income before income tax

   1,399      2,226      2,902           1,429      1,399      2,226       

Income tax expense

   (289    (532    (894)          (360)     (289)     (532)      

 

 

Income from continuing operations

   1,110      1,694      2,008        

Discontinued operations, net

         (20)       

 

Net income

   1,110      1,694      1,988           1,069      1,110      1,694       

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (542    (632    (699)          (474)     (542)     (632)      

 

 

Net income attributable to Loews Corporation

  $568     $1,062     $1,289          $595     $568     $1,062       

 

 

Net income attributable to Loews Corporation:

        

Income from continuing operations

  $568     $1,062     $1,308        

Discontinued operations, net

         (19)       

Basic net income per common share

  $1.53     $1.44     $2.62       

 

 

Net income

  $568     $1,062     $1,289        

 

Diluted net income per common share

  $1.53     $1.43     $2.62       

 

Dividends per share

  $0.25     $0.25     $0.25       

Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding

   388.64      395.12      404.53       

Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding

   389.51      395.87      405.32       

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

Year Ended December 31  2012     2011     2010        

 

 
(In millions, except per share data)            

Basic net income per common share:

      

Income from continuing operations

  $      1.44    $      2.62    $      3.12        

Discontinued operations, net

       (0.04)       

 

 

Net income

  $1.44    $2.62    $3.08        

 

 

Diluted net income per common share:

      

Income from continuing operations

  $1.43    $2.62    $3.11        

Discontinued operations, net

       (0.04)       

 

 

Net income

  $1.43    $2.62    $3.07        

 

 

Dividends per share

  $0.25    $0.25    $0.25        

Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding

   395.12     404.53     418.72        

Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding

   395.87     405.32     419.52        
Year Ended December 31      2013           2012           2011         

 

 
(In millions)            

Net income

  $     1,069     $     1,110     $     1,694       

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), after tax

      

Changes in:

      

Net unrealized gains on investments with other-than-temporary impairments

        84      10       

Net other unrealized gains (losses) on investments

   (679)     339      362       

 

 

Total unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments

   (673)     423      372       

Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

   (23)     (8)     39       

Pension liability

   329      (132)     (238)      

Foreign currency

   (11)     39      (14)      

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   (378)     322      159       

 

 

Comprehensive income

   691      1,432      1,853       

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (437)     (575)     (648)      

 

 

Total comprehensive income attributable to Loews Corporation

  $254     $857     $1,205       

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOMEEQUITY

 

Year Ended December 31    2012      2011      2010       

 

 
(In millions)            

Net income

  $      1,110    $      1,694    $      1,988        

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), after tax

      

Changes in:

      

Net unrealized gains on investments with other-than-temporary impairments

   84     10     86        

Net other unrealized gains on investments

   339     362     494        

 

 

Total unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments

   423     372     580        

Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

   (8   39     60        

Foreign currency

   39     (14   49        

Pension liability

   (132   (238   29        

 

 

Other comprehensive income

   322     159     718        

 

 

Comprehensive income

   1,432     1,853     2,706        

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (575   (648   (771)       

 

 

Total comprehensive income attributable to Loews Corporation

  $857    $1,205    $1,935        

 

 
       Loews Corporation Shareholders     
     Total   Common
Stock
     Additional
  Paid-in
  Capital
     Retained
  Earnings
       Accumulated
Other
    Comprehensive
    Income (Loss)
   Common
Stock
Held in
Treasury
   Noncontrolling
Interests
 

 

 
(In millions)                            

Balance, January 1, 2011

  $23,028     $            4        $3,667      $      14,500         $230        $      (15)    $4,642       

Net income

   1,694          1,062          632       

Other comprehensive income

   159            143           16       

Dividends paid

   (500)         (101)         (399)      

Acquisition of CNA Surety noncontrolling interests

   (475)       (59)        17           (433)      

Disposition of FICOH ownership interest

   (155)           (7)          (148)      

Issuance of equity securities by subsidiary

   152        28         1           123       

Purchase of Loews treasury stock

   (718)             (718)    

Retirement of treasury stock

          (164)      (569)       733     

Issuance of Loews common stock

          4            

Stock-based compensation

   22        19             3       

Other

   (8)       (1)      (2)         (5)      

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

   23,203      4         3,494       14,890      384              4,431       

Net income

   1,110          568          542       

Other comprehensive income

   322            289           33       

Dividends paid

   (549)         (99)         (450)      

Issuance of equity securities by subsidiary

   774        115         5           654       

Purchase of Loews treasury stock

   (222)             (222)    

Retirement of treasury stock

          (47)      (165)       212     

Issuance of Loews common stock

   13        13            

Stock-based compensation

   23        20             3       

Other

            (2)         4       

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

  $    24,676     $4        $    3,595      $      15,192         $     678        $(10)    $    5,217       

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

 

  Loews Corporation Shareholders     
            Accumulated   Common     
        Additional   Other   Stock     
    Common   Paid-in Retained Comprehensive   Held in   Noncontrolling       Loews Corporation Shareholders     
  Total Stock   Capital Earnings Income (Loss)   Treasury   Interests   Total   Common
Stock
   Additional
Paid-in
Capital
   Retained
Earnings
   Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
   

Common
Stock

Held in

Treasury

   Noncontrolling
Interests
 

 

 
(In millions)                                    

Balance, January 1, 2010

  $  21,085   $      4    $    3,637   $      13,693    $      (419)      $      (16)     $4,186        

Adjustment to initially apply guidance on accounting for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts

   (79     (65      (14)       

Balance, December 31, 2012

  $24,676     $            4          $3,595      $15,192        $678         $          (10)             $5,217           

Net income

   1,988       1,289        699           1,069          595             474           

Other comprehensive income

   718        646         72        

Other comprehensive loss

   (378)           (341)           (37)          

Dividends paid

   (597     (105      (492)          (597)         (97)            (500)          

Issuance of equity securities by subsidiary

   279      83     1         195        

Purchase of Loews treasury stock

   (405        (405)     

Issuance of Loews common stock

   8      8        

Retirement of treasury stock

   -      (97  (309    406      

Stock-based compensation

   21      18         3        

Other

   10      18    (3  2         (7)       

 

Balance, December 31, 2010

   23,028    4     3,667    14,500    230       (15)      4,642        

Net income

   1,694       1,062        632        

Other comprehensive income

   159        143         16        

Dividends paid

   (500     (101      (399)       

Acquisition of CNA Surety noncontrolling interests

   (475    (59   17         (433)       

Disposition of FICOH ownership interest

   (155      (7)        (148)       

Issuance of equity securities by subsidiary

   152      28     1         123           337       51         2            284           

Purchase of Loews treasury stock

   (718        (718)        (218)             (218)           

Retirement of treasury stock

   -      (164  (569    733                (48)      (180)          228            

Issuance of Loews common stock

   4      4                  5            

Stock-based compensation

   22      19         3           18        3             15           

Other

   (8    (1  (2      (5)          (6)       1       (2)            (5)          

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

  $23,203   $4    $3,494   $14,890   $384      $-      $4,431        

Balance, December 31, 2013

  $    24,906     $            4          $    3,607      $    15,508        $        339         $    -              $    5,448           

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITYCASH FLOWS

 

       Loews Corporation Shareholders     
                   Accumulated   Common     
           Additional       Other   Stock     
       Common   Paid-in   Retained   Comprehensive   Held in   Noncontrolling 
     Total   Stock   Capital   Earnings   Income   Treasury   Interests 

 

 
(In millions)                            

Balance, December 31, 2011

  $23,203      $4      $3,494      $    14,890      $384      $-      $4,431          

Net income

   1,110           568           542          

Other comprehensive income

   322             289         33          

Dividends paid

   (549)          (99)          (450)         

Issuance of equity securities by subsidiary

   774         115         5         654          

Purchase of Loews treasury stock

   (222)              (222)     

Retirement of treasury stock

   -         (47)      (165)        212      

Issuance of Loews common stock

   13         13            

Stock-based compensation

   23         20             3          

Other

   2           (2)          4          

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

  $    24,676      $  4      $3,595      $15,192      $678      $(10)     $    5,217          

 

 
Year Ended December 31    2013         2012         2011         

 

 
(In millions)            

Operating Activities:

      

Net income

  $1,069     $1,110     $1,694       

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided (used) by operating activities:

      

Investment (gains) losses

   (26)     (57)     52       

Undistributed (earnings) losses

   (380)     (103)     74       

Amortization of investments

   (24)     (50)     (64)      

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   871      905      833       

Impairment of goodwill

   636       

Impairment of natural gas and oil properties

   291      680     

Provision for deferred income taxes

        (22)     268       

Other non-cash items

   83      55      52       

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net:

      

Receivables

   87      327      1,085       

Deferred acquisition costs

        (16)     (1)      

Insurance reserves

   (68)     430      (237)      

Other assets

   (19)     74      181       

Other liabilities

   470      (73)     (326)      

Trading securities

   (901)     (406)     354       

 

 

Net cash flow operating activities

   2,097      2,854      3,965       

 

 

Investing Activities:

      

Purchases of fixed maturities

     (11,197)       (10,299)       (12,168)      

Proceeds from sales of fixed maturities

   6,869      6,123      7,591       

Proceeds from maturities of fixed maturities

   3,271      3,699      3,055       

Purchases of equity securities

   (77)     (54)     (72)      

Proceeds from sales of equity securities

   103      86      178       

Purchases of limited partnership investments

   (323)     (372)     (303)      

Proceeds from sales of limited partnership investments

   204      227      143       

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

   (1,737)     (1,405)     (1,335)      

Acquisitions

   (235)     (987)     (548)      

Dispositions

   182      221      222       

Change in short term investments

   (101)     (192)     1,461       

Other, net

   (257)     (142)     (127)      

 

 

Net cash flow investing activities

   (3,298)     (3,095)     (1,903)      

 

 

Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Year Ended December 31  2013       2012       2011         

 

 
(In millions)            

Financing Activities:

      

Dividends paid

  $(97)    $(99)    $(101)      

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests

   (500)     (450)     (399)      

Acquisition of CNA Surety noncontrolling interests

       (475)      

Purchases of treasury shares

   (228)     (212)     (732)      

Issuance of common stock

        13      4       

Proceeds from sale of subsidiary stock

   370      849      172       

Principal payments on debt

       (1,494)         (2,910)     (2,832)      

Issuance of debt

   3,255      3,152      2,321       

Other, net

   (40)     (7)     (11)      

 

 

Net cash flow financing activities

   1,271      336          (2,053)      

 

 

Effect of foreign exchange rate on cash

   (3)         

 

 

Net change in cash

   67      99      9       

Cash, beginning of year

   228      129      120       

 

 

Cash, end of year

  $295     $228     $129       

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Year Ended December 31  2012  2011  2010 

 

 
(In millions)          

Operating Activities:

    

Net income

  $1,110   $1,694   $1,988       

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:

    

Income from discontinued operations

     20       

Investment (gains) losses

   (57  52    (56)      

Undistributed (earnings) losses

   (103  74    (184)      

Amortization of investments

   (50  (64  (118)      

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   905    833    816       

Impairment of natural gas and oil properties

   680    

Provision for deferred income taxes

   (22  268    470       

Other non-cash items

   55    52    (53)      

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net:

    

Receivables

   327    1,085    (335)      

Deferred acquisition costs

   (16  (1  29       

Insurance reserves

   430    (237  (805)      

Other assets

   74    181    (83)      

Other liabilities

   (73  (326  132       

Trading securities

   (406  354    (1,778)      

 

 

Net cash flow operating activities - continuing operations

   2,854    3,965    43       

Net cash flow operating activities - discontinued operations

     (90)      

 

 

Net cash flow operating activities - total

   2,854    3,965    (47)      

 

 

Investing Activities:

    

Purchases of fixed maturities

   (10,299  (12,168  (16,715)      

Proceeds from sales of fixed maturities

   6,123    7,591    12,514       

Proceeds from maturities of fixed maturities

   3,699    3,055    3,340       

Purchases of equity securities

   (54  (72  (99)      

Proceeds from sales of equity securities

   86    178    341       

Purchases of limited partnership investments

   (372  (303  (663)      

Proceeds from sales of limited partnership investments

   227    143    166       

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

   (1,236  (857  (917)      

Deposits for construction of offshore drilling equipment

   (169  (478 

Acquisitions

   (987  (548 

Dispositions

   221    222    805       

Change in short term investments

   (192  1,461    1,892       

Other, net

   (142  (127  (76)      

 

 

Net cash flow investing activities - continuing operations

   (3,095  (1,903  588       

Net cash flow investing activities - discontinued operations

     76       

 

 

Net cash flow investing activities - total

   (3,095  (1,903  664       

 

 

Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Year Ended December 31  2012  2011  2010 

 

 
(In millions)          

Financing Activities:

    

Dividends paid

  $(99 $(101  $    (105)      

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests

   (450  (399  (492)      

Acquisition of CNA Surety noncontrolling interests

    (475 

Purchases of treasury shares

   (212  (732  (405)      

Issuance of common stock

   13    4    8       

Proceeds from sale of subsidiary stock

   849    172    344       

Principal payments on debt

   (2,910  (2,832  (659)      

Issuance of debt

   3,152    2,321    645       

Other, net

   (7  (11  (24)      

 

 

Net cash flow financing activities - continuing operations

   336    (2,053  (688)      

Net cash flow financing activities - discontinued operations

    

 

 

Net cash flow financing activities - total

   336    (2,053  (688)      

 

 

Effect of foreign exchange rate on cash - continuing operations

   4     1       

 

 

Net change in cash

   99    9    (70)      

Net cash transactions:

    

From continuing operations to discontinued operations

     (14)      

To discontinued operations from continuing operations

     14       

Cash, beginning of year

   129    120    190       

 

 

Cash, end of year

  $      228   $129   $120       

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation – Loews Corporation is a holding company. Its subsidiaries are engaged in the following lines of business: commercial property and casualty insurance (CNA Financial Corporation (“CNA”), a 90% owned subsidiary); the operation of offshore oil and gas drilling rigs (Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (“Diamond Offshore”), a 50.4% owned subsidiary); transportation and storage of natural gas and natural gas liquids and gathering and processing of natural gas (Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (“Boardwalk Pipeline”), a 55%53% owned subsidiary); exploration, production and marketing of natural gas and oil (including condensate and natural gas liquids), (HighMount Exploration & Production LLC (“HighMount”), a wholly owned subsidiary); and the operation of a chain of hotels (Loews Hotels Holding Corporation (“Loews Hotels”), a wholly owned subsidiary). Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Company,” “Loews” and “Registrant” as used herein mean Loews Corporation excluding its subsidiaries and the term “Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation” as used herein means Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation Shareholders.shareholders.

Principles of consolidation – The Consolidated Financial Statements include all subsidiaries and intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The equity method of accounting is used for investments in associated companies in which the Company generally has an interest of 20% to 50%.

Accounting estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the related notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Accounting changes – In October of 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued updated accounting guidance which limits the capitalization of costs incurred to acquire or renew insurance contracts to those that are incremental direct costs of successful contract acquisitions. The previous guidance allowed the capitalization of acquisition costs that vary with and are primarily related to the acquisition of new and renewal insurance contracts, whether the costs related to successful or unsuccessful efforts.

As of January 1, 2012, the Company adopted the updated accounting guidance prospectively as of January 1, 2004, the earliest date practicable. Due to the lack of available historical data related to certain accident and health contracts issued prior to January 1, 2004, a full retrospective application of the change in accounting guidance was impracticable. Acquisition costs capitalized prior to January 1, 2004 will continue to be accounted for under the previous accounting guidance and will be amortized over the premium-paying period of the related policies using assumptions consistent with those used for computing future policy benefit reserves for such contracts.

The Company has adjusted its previously reported financial information included herein to reflect the change in accounting guidance for deferred acquisition costs. The impacts of adopting the new accounting standard on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2011 were a $106 million decrease in Deferred acquisition costs of insurance subsidiaries and a $37 million decrease in Deferred income tax liabilities. The impacts to Accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) and Additional paid-in capital (“APIC”) were the result of the indirect effects of the Company’s adoption of this guidance on Shadow Adjustments, as further discussed below, and CNA’s acquisition of the noncontrolling interest of CNA Surety in 2011.

The impacts on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $234 million and $219 million decreases in Amortization of deferred acquisition costs, $242 million and $219 million increases in Other operating expenses, resulting in a $2 million decrease and a $1 million increase in Net income and a $0.01 decrease and no impact in Basic and Diluted net income per share. There were no changes to net cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities for the comparative periods presented as a result of the adoption of the new accounting standard.

Investments – The Company classifies its fixed maturity securities and equity securities as either available-for-sale or trading, and as such, they are carried at fair value. Short term investments are carried at fair value. Changes

in fair value of trading securities are reported within Net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Changes in fair value related to available-for-sale securities are reported as a component of Other comprehensive income. The cost of fixed maturity securities classified as available-for-sale is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity, which are included in Net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Losses may be recognized within the Consolidated Statements of Income when a decline in value is determined by the Company to be other-than-temporary.

To the extent that unrealized gains on fixed income securities supporting long term care products and payout annuity contracts would result in a premium deficiency if those gains were realized, a related decrease in Deferred acquisition costs and/or increase in Insurance reserves is recorded, net of tax and noncontrolling interests, as a reduction of net unrealized gains through Other comprehensive income (“Shadow Adjustments”). ForShadow Adjustments decreased $880 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) and increased $710 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) for the years ended December 31, 20122013 and 2011, Shadow Adjustments, net of participating policyholders’ interest, of $710 million and $515 million were recorded (after tax and noncontrolling interests).2012. At December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, net unrealized gains on investments included in AOCIAccumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) were correspondingly reduced by $478 million and $1.4 billion and $650 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests).

For asset-backed securities included in fixed maturity securities, the Company recognizes income using an effective yield based on anticipated prepayments and the estimated economic life of the securities. When estimates of prepayments change, the effective yield is recalculated to reflect actual payments to date and anticipated future payments. The amortized cost of high credit quality securities is adjusted to the amount that would have existed had the new effective yield been applied since the acquisition of the securities. Such adjustments are reflected in Net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Interest income on lower rated securities is determined using the prospective yield method.

The Company’s carrying value of investments in limited partnerships is its share of the net asset value of each partnership, as determined by the General Partner. Certain partnerships for which results are not available on a timely basis are reported on a lag, primarily three months or less. These investments are accounted for under the

equity method and changes in net asset values are recorded within Net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Investments in derivative securities are carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported as a component of Investment gains (losses), Income (loss) from trading portfolio, or Other comprehensive income (loss), depending on their hedge designation. A derivative is typically defined as an instrument whose value is “derived” from an underlying instrument, index or rate, has a notional amount, requires little or no initial investment and can be net settled. Derivatives include, but are not limited to, the following types of investments: interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and floors, put and call options, warrants, futures, forwards, commitments to purchase securities, credit default swaps and combinations of the foregoing. Derivatives embedded within non-derivative instruments (such as call options embedded in convertible bonds) must be split from the host instrument when the embedded derivative is not clearly and closely related to the host instrument.

A security is impaired if the fair value of the security is less than its cost adjusted for accretion, amortization and previously recorded other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses, otherwise defined as an unrealized loss. When a security is impaired, the impairment is evaluated to determine whether it is temporary or other-than-temporary.

Significant judgment is required in the determination of whether an OTTI loss has occurred for a security. CNA follows a consistent and systematic process for determining and recording an OTTI loss. CNA has established a committee responsible for the OTTI process. This committee, referred to as the Impairment Committee, is made up of three officers appointed by CNA’s Chief Financial Officer. The Impairment Committee is responsible for evaluating all securities in an unrealized loss position on at least a quarterly basis.

The Impairment Committee’s assessment of whether an OTTI loss has occurred incorporates both quantitative and qualitative information. Fixed maturity securities that CNA intends to sell, or it more likely than not will be required to sell before recovery of amortized cost, are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired and the entire difference between the amortized cost basis and fair value of the security is recognized as an OTTI loss in earnings. The remaining fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position are evaluated to determine if a credit loss exists. The factors considered by the Impairment Committee include: (i) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, (ii) whether the debtor is current on interest and principal payments, (iii) credit ratings of the securities and (iv) general market conditions and industry or sector specific outlook. CNA also considers results and analysis of cash flow modeling for asset-backed securities, and when appropriate, other fixed maturity securities.

The focus of the analysis for asset-backed securities is on assessing the sufficiency and quality of underlying collateral and timing of cash flows based on scenario tests. If the present value of the modeled expected cash flows equals or exceeds the amortized cost of a security, no credit loss is judged to exist and the asset-backed security is deemed to be temporarily impaired. If the present value of the expected cash flows is less than amortized cost, the security is judged to be other-than-temporarily impaired for credit reasons and that shortfall, referred to as the credit component, is recognized as an OTTI loss in earnings. The difference between the adjusted amortized cost basis and fair value, referred to as the non-credit component, is recognized as OTTI in Other comprehensive income. In subsequent reporting periods, a change in intent to sell or further credit impairment on a security whose fair value has not deteriorated will cause the non-credit component originally recorded as OTTI in Other comprehensive income to be recognized as an OTTI loss in earnings.

CNA performs the discounted cash flow analysis using stressed scenarios to determine future expectations regarding recoverability. For asset-backed securities, significant assumptions enter into these cash flow projections including delinquency rates, probable risk of default, loss severity upon a default, over collateralization and interest coverage triggers and credit support from lower level tranches.

CNA applies the same impairment model as described above for the majority of non-redeemable preferred stock securities on the basis that these securities possess characteristics similar to debt securities and that the issuers maintain their ability to pay dividends. For all other equity securities, in determining whether the security is other-than-temporarily impaired, the Impairment Committee considers a number of factors including, but not limited to: (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost, (ii) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, (iii) the intent and ability of CNA to retain its investment for a

period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in value and (iv) general market conditions and industry or sector specific outlook.

Joint venture investments – The Company has 20% to 50% interests in operating joint ventures related to the Bluegrass Project as discussed in Note 2 and hotel properties that are accounted for under the equity method. The Company’s investment in these entities was $242 million and $67 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and reported in Other assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Equity income for these investments was $12 million, $24 million and $24 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and reported in Other operating expenses on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Some of these investments are variable interest entities (“VIE”) as defined in the accounting guidance because the entities will require additional funding from each equity owner throughout the development and construction phase and are accounted for under the equity method since the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The maximum exposure to loss for the VIE investments is $336 million, consisting of the amount of the investment and debt guarantees.

The following tables present summarized financial information for these joint ventures:

Year Ended December 31    2013            2012        

 

(In millions)        

Total assets

   $     1,336         $        672      

Total liabilities

   954         625      

Year Ended December 31  2013             2012            2011         

 

Revenues

  $        349          $        294         $        284      

Net income

   7          32         29      

Hedging – The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedging transactions. The Company also formally assesses (both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis) whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods. When it is determined that a derivative for which hedge accounting has been designated is not (or ceases to be) highly effective, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively. See Note 5 for additional information on the Company’s use of derivatives.

Securities lending activities – The Company lends securities for the purpose of enhancing income or to finance positions to unrelated parties who have been designated as primary dealers by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Borrowers of these securities must deposit and maintain collateral with the Company of no less than 100% of the fair value of the securities loaned. U.S. Government securities and cash are accepted as collateral. The Company maintains effective control over loaned securities and, therefore, continues to report such securities as investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Securities lending is typically done on a matched-book basis where the collateral is invested to substantially match the term of the loan. This matching of terms tends to limit risk. In accordance with the Company’s lending agreements, securities on loan are returned immediately to the Company upon notice. Collateral is not reflected as an asset of the Company. There was no collateral held at December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012.

Revenue recognition – Premiums on property and casualty insurance contracts are recognized in proportion to the underlying risk insured which principally are earned ratably over the duration of the policies. Premiums on long term care contracts are earned ratably over the policy year in which they are due. The reserve for unearned premiums represents the portion of premiums written relating to the unexpired terms of coverage.

Insurance receivables include balances due currently or in the future, including amounts due from insureds related to losses under high deductible policies, and are presented at unpaid balances, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Amounts are considered past due based on policy payment terms. That allowance is determined based on periodic evaluations of aged receivables, management’s experience and current economic conditions. Insurance receivables and any related allowance are written off after collection efforts are exhausted or a negotiated settlement is reached.

Property and casualty contracts that are retrospectively rated contain provisions that result in an adjustment to the initial policy premium depending on the contract provisions and loss experience of the insured during the experience period. For such contracts, CNA estimates the amount of ultimate premiums that it may earn upon completion of the experience period and recognizes either an asset or a liability for the difference between the initial policy premium and the estimated ultimate premium. CNA adjusts such estimated ultimate premium amounts during the course of the experience period based on actual results to date. The resulting adjustment is recorded as either a reduction of or an increase to the earned premiums for the period.

Contract drilling revenue from dayrate drilling contracts is recognized as services are performed. In connection with such drilling contracts, Diamond Offshore may receive fees (either lump-sum or dayrate) for the mobilization of equipment. These fees are earned as services are performed over the initial term of the related drilling contracts. Absent a contract, mobilization costs are recognized currently. From time to time, Diamond Offshore may receive fees from its customers for capital improvements to their rigs. Diamond Offshore defers such fees received and recognizes these fees into revenue on a straight-line basis over the period of the related drilling contract. Diamond Offshore capitalizes the costs of such capital improvements and depreciates them over the estimated useful life of the improvement.

Revenues from transportation and storage services are recognized in the period the service is provided based on contractual terms and the related transported and stored volumes. The majority of Boardwalk Pipeline’s operating subsidiaries are subject to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) regulations and, accordingly, certain revenues collected may be subject to possible refunds to its customers. An estimated refund liability is recorded considering regulatory proceedings, advice of counsel and estimated total exposure.

HighMount’s natural gas and oil production revenue is recognized based on actual volumes of natural gas and oil sold to purchasers. Sales require delivery of the product to the purchaser, passage of title and probability of collection of purchaser amounts owed. Natural gas and oil production revenue is reported net of royalties. HighMount uses the sales method of accounting for gas imbalances. An imbalance is created when the volumes of gas sold by HighMount pertaining to a property do not equate to the volumes produced to which HighMount is entitled based on its interest in the property. An asset or liability is recognized to the extent that HighMount has an imbalance in excess of the remaining reserves on the underlying properties.

Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves – Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, except reserves for structured settlements not associated with asbestos and environmental pollution (“A&EP”), workers’ compensation lifetime claims, and accident and health claims are not discounted and are based on (i) case basis estimates for losses reported on direct business, adjusted in the aggregate for ultimate loss expectations; (ii) estimates of incurred but not reported losses; (iii) estimates of losses on assumed reinsurance; (iv) estimates of future expenses to be incurred in the settlement of claims; (v) estimates of salvage and subrogation recoveries and (vi) estimates of amounts due from insureds related to losses under high deductible policies. Management considers current conditions and trends as well as past CNA and industry experience in establishing these estimates. The

effects of inflation, which can be significant, are implicitly considered in the reserving process and are part of the recorded reserve balance. Ceded claim and claim adjustment expense reserves are reported as a component of Receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Claim and claim adjustment expense reserves are presented net of anticipated amounts due from insureds related to losses under deductible policies of $1.3 billion and $1.4 billion as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012. A significant portion of these amounts are supported by collateral. CNA also has an allowance for uncollectible deductible amounts, which is presented as a component of the allowance for doubtful accounts included in Receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Structured settlements have been negotiated for certain property and casualty insurance claims. Structured settlements are agreements to provide fixed periodic payments to claimants. Certain structured settlements are funded by annuities purchased from Continental Assurance Company (“CAC”), a wholly owned and consolidated subsidiary of CNA, for which the related annuity obligations are reported in Future policy benefits reserves. Obligations for structured settlements not funded by annuities are included in claim and claim adjustment expense reserves and carried at present values determined using interest rates ranging from 7.1% to 9.7% at December 31, 20122013 and 5.5% to 8.0% at December 31, 2011.2012. At December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the discounted reserves for unfunded structured settlements were $602$580 million and $632$602 million, net of discount of $1.0 billion$969 million and $1.1$1.0 billion.

Workers’ compensation lifetime claim reserves are calculated using mortality assumptions determined through statutory regulation and economic factors. Accident and health claim reserves are calculated using mortality and morbidity assumptions based on CNA and industry experience. Workers’ compensation lifetime claim reserves and accident and health claim reserves are discounted at interest rates ranging from 3.0% to 6.8% at December 31, 2013 and 3.0% to 6.5% at both December 31, 2012 and 2011.2012. At December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, such discounted reserves totaled $2.2$2.4 billion and $2.1$2.2 billion, net of discount of $837$617 million and $520$837 million.

Future policy benefits reserves – Reserves for long term care products and payout annuity contracts are computed using the net level premium method, which incorporates actuarial assumptions as to morbidity, mortality, persistency, discount rates, which are impacted by expected investment yieldsrate and expenses. Expense assumptions include the estimated effects of expenses to be incurred beyond the premium paying period. Actuarial assumptions generally vary by plan, age at issue and policy duration. The initial assumptions are determined at issuance, include a margin for adverse deviation, and are locked in throughout the life of the contract unless a premium deficiency develops. If a premium deficiency emerges, the assumptions are unlocked and deferred acquisition costs, if any, and the future policy benefit reserves are adjusted. Interest rates for long term care products range from 4.5% to 7.9% at December 31, 2013 and from 5.0% to 7.4% at December 31, 2012 and from 5.0% to 7.5% at December 31, 2011.2012. Interest rates for payout annuity contracts range from 5.0% to 8.7% at December 31, 20122013 and from 5.4% to 7.5% at December 31, 2011.2012. In 2012, CNA unlocked assumptions related to its payout annuity contracts due to anticipated adverse changes in discount rates, which reflectreflected the then current low interest rate environment and its view of expected investment yields, resulting in loss recognition which increased insurance liabilities by $33 million. In 2011, CNA unlocked assumptions related to its payout annuity contracts due to anticipated adverse changes in mortality and discount rates resulting in loss recognition which increased insurance reserves by $166 million.

Policyholders’ funds reserves – Policyholders’ funds reserves primarily include reserves for investment contracts without life contingencies. For these contracts, policyholder liabilities are generally equal to the accumulated policy account values, which consist of an accumulation of deposit payments plus credited interest, less withdrawals and amounts assessed through the end of the period.

Guaranty fund and other insurance-related assessments– Liabilities for guaranty fund and other insurance-related assessments are accrued when an assessment is probable, when it can be reasonably estimated, and when the event obligating the entity to pay an imposed or probable assessment has occurred. Liabilities for guaranty funds and other insurance-related assessments are not discounted and are included as part of Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the liability balances were $143 million and $152 million. As of December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were $1 million and $2 million of related assets for premium tax offsets. This asset is limited to the amount that is able to be offset against premium tax on future premium collections from business written or committed to be written.

Reinsurance – Reinsurance accounting allows for contractual cash flows to be reflected as premiums and losses. To qualify for reinsurance accounting, reinsurance agreements must include risk transfer. To meet risk transfer requirements, a reinsurance contract must include both insurance risk, consisting of underwriting and timing risk, and a reasonable possibility of a significant loss for the assuming entity.

Reinsurance receivables related to paid losses are presented at unpaid balances. Reinsurance receivables related to unpaid losses are estimated in a manner consistent with claim and claim adjustment expense reserves or future policy benefits reserves. Reinsurance receivables are reported net of an allowance for doubtful accounts on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The cost of reinsurance is primarily accounted for over the life of the underlying reinsured policies using assumptions consistent with those used to account for the underlying policies or over the reinsurance contract period. The ceding of insurance does not discharge the primary liability of CNA.

CNA has established an allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance receivables which relates to both amounts already billed on ceded paid losses as well as ceded reserves that will be billed when losses are paid in the future. The allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance receivables is estimated on the basis of periodic evaluations of balances due from reinsurers, reinsurer solvency, management’s experience and current economic conditions. Reinsurer financial strength ratings are updated and reviewed on an annual basis or sooner if CNA becomes aware of significant changes related to a reinsurer. Because billed receivables are generally approximate 5% or less of total reinsurance receivables, the age of the reinsurance receivables related to paid losses is not a significant input into the allowance analysis. Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance receivables are presented as a component of Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Amounts are considered past due based on the reinsurance contract terms. Reinsurance receivables related to paid losses and any related allowance are written off after collection efforts have been exhausted or a negotiated settlement is reached with the reinsurer. Reinsurance receivables related to paid losses from insolvent insurers are written off when the settlement due from the estate can be reasonably estimated. At the time reinsurance receivables related to paid losses are written off, any required adjustment to reinsurance receivables related to unpaid losses is recorded as a component of Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Reinsurance contracts that do not effectively transfer the economic risk of loss on the underlying policies are recorded using the deposit method of accounting, which requires that premium paid or received by the ceding company or assuming company be accounted for as a deposit asset or liability. CNA had $3 million and $18 million recorded as deposit assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and 2011,$130 million and $125 million and $123 million recorded as deposit liabilities at December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012. Income on reinsurance contracts accounted for under the deposit method is recognized using an effective yield based on the anticipated timing of payments and the remaining life of the contract. When the anticipated timing of payments changes, the effective yield is recalculated to reflect actual payments to date and the estimated timing of future payments. The deposit asset or liability is adjusted to the amount that would have existed had the new effective yield been applied since the inception of the contract.

Participating insurance – Policyholder dividends are accrued using an estimate of the amount to be paid based on underlying contractual obligations under policies and applicable state laws. Limitations exist on the amount of income from participating life insurance contracts that may be distributed to shareholders, and therefore the share of income on these policies that cannot be distributed to shareholders is excluded from Shareholders’ Equity by a charge to Income and Other comprehensive income and the establishment of a corresponding liability.

Deferred acquisition costs – Acquisition costs include commissions, premium taxes and certain underwriting and policy issuance costs which are incremental direct costs of successful contract acquisitions. Deferred acquisition costs related to long term care contracts issued prior to January 1, 2004 include costs which vary with and are primarily related to the acquisition of business, as further discussed above.business.

Acquisition costs related to property and casualty business are deferred and amortized ratably over the period the related premiums are earned.

Deferred acquisition costs related to long term care contracts are amortized over the premium-paying period of the related policies using assumptions consistent with those used for computing future policy benefit reserves for such contracts. Assumptions are made at the date of policy issuance or acquisition and are consistently applied during the

lives of the contracts. Deviations from estimated experience are included in results of operations when they occur. For these contracts, the amortization period is typically the estimated life of the policy. At December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, deferred acquisition costs were presented net of Shadow Adjustments of $369$342 million and $398$369 million.

CNA evaluates deferred acquisition costs for recoverability. Anticipated investment income is considered in the determination of the recoverability of deferred acquisition costs. Adjustments, if necessary, are recorded in current results of operations.

Deferred acquisition costs are presented net of ceding commissions and other ceded acquisition costs. Unamortized deferred acquisition costs relating to contracts that have been substantially changed by a modification in benefits, features, rights or coverages that were not anticipated in the original contract are not deferred and are included as a charge to operations in the period during which the contract modification occurred.

Investments in life settlement contracts and related revenue recognition – Prior to 2002, CNA purchased investments in life settlement contracts. A life settlement contract is a contract between the owner of a life insurance policy (the policy owner) and a third party investor (investor). Under a life settlement contract, CNA obtained the ownership and beneficiary rights of an underlying life insurance policy.

CNA accounts for its investments in life settlement contracts using the fair value method. Under the fair value method, each life settlement contract is carried at its fair value at the end of each reporting period. The change in fair value, life insurance proceeds received and periodic maintenance costs, such as premiums, necessary to keep the underlying policy in force, are recorded in Other revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The fair value of CNA’s investments in life settlement contracts were $100$88 million and $117$100 million at December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and are included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The cash receipts and payments related to life settlement contracts are included in Cash flows from operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The following table details the values for life settlement contracts. The determination of fair value is discussed in Note 4.

 

  Number of Life
Settlement
Contracts
   Fair Value of Life
Settlement
Contracts
   Face Amount of
Life Insurance
Policies
   Number of Life
Settlement
Contracts
   Fair Value of Life
Settlement
Contracts
     Face Amount of  
Life Insurance
Policies
 

 

 
(Dollar amounts in millions)                        

Estimated maturity during:

            

2013

   70            $15                $41          

2014

   60             13                 36             60              $13              $39            

2015

   60             11                 34             60               11               35            

2016

   50             9                 30             50               9               32            

2017

   40             7                 27             50               8               29            

2018

   40               7               26            

Thereafter

   390             45                 237             364               40               217            

 

 

Total

   670            $        100                $        405             624              $            88              $378            

 

 

CNA uses an actuarial model to estimate the aggregate face amount of life insurance that is expected to mature in each future year and the corresponding fair value. This model projects the likelihood of the insured’s death for each inforce policy based upon CNA’s estimated mortality rates, which may vary due to the relatively small size of the portfolio of life settlement contracts. The number of life settlement contracts presented in the table above is based upon the average face amount of inforce policies estimated to mature in each future year.

The increase (decrease) in fair value recognized for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 on contracts still being held was $(2) million, $11 million $5 million and $10$5 million. The gains recognized during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 on contracts that settled were $15 million, $42 million $28 million and $19$28 million.

Separate Account Business – Separate account assets and liabilities represent contract holder funds related to investment and annuity products for which the policyholder assumes substantially all the risk and reward. The assets

are segregated into accounts with specific underlying investment objectives and are legally segregated from CNA. All assets of the separate account business are carried at fair value with an equal amount recorded for separate account liabilities. Fee income accruing to CNA related to separate accounts is primarily included within Other revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

A number of separate account pension deposit contracts guarantee principal and an annual minimum rate of interest. If aggregate contract value in the separate account exceeds the fair value of the related assets, an additional Policyholders’ funds liability is established. During 2012 and 2010, CNA decreased this pretax Policyholders’ funds liability by $20 million and $24 million. CNA increased this pretax Policyholders’ funds liability by $18 million in 2011. Certain of these contracts are subject to a fair value adjustment if terminated by the policyholder.

Goodwill– Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets of acquired entities. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually or when certain triggering events require additional tests. In 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline changed the dateSubsequent reversal of its annuala goodwill impairment test from December 31 to November 30. The changecharge is preferable as it better aligns Boardwalk Pipeline’s goodwill impairment testing procedures with its planning process and alleviates resource constraints in connection with its year-end closing and financial reporting process. Due to significant judgments and estimates that are utilized in an impairment analysis, Boardwalk Pipeline determined it was impracticable to objectively determine operating and valuation estimates prior to November 30, 2012. As a result, the change in accounting principle was prospectively applied from November 30, 2012 and does not delay, accelerate, or avoid an impairment charge.permitted. See Note 8 for additional information on goodwill.

As a result of impairments of its Natural gas and oil properties (see Note 7), which were caused by declines in natural gas and natural gas liquids (“NGL”) prices, HighMount tested its goodwill for impairment at December 31, 2012. No impairment charge was required.

Property, plant and equipment – Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”). Depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the various classes of properties. Leaseholds and leasehold improvements are depreciated

or amortized over the terms of the related leases (including optional renewal periods where appropriate) or the estimated lives of improvements, if less than the lease term.

The principal service lives used in computing provisions for depreciation are as follows:

 

   

Years

Pipeline equipment

  30 to 50  

Offshore drilling equipment

  15 to 30  

Other

  3 to 40  

HighMount follows the full cost method of accounting for natural gas and oil exploration and production activities. Under the full cost method, all direct costs of property acquisition, exploration and development activities are capitalized. These capitalized costs are subject to a quarterly ceiling test. Under the ceiling test, amounts capitalized are limited to the present value of estimated future net revenues to be derived from the anticipated production of proved natural gas and oil reserves, assuming an average price during the twelve month period adjusted for cash flow hedges in place, and limiting the classification of proved undeveloped reserves to locations scheduled to be drilled within five years. If net capitalized costs exceed the ceiling test at the end of any quarterly period, then a permanent write-down of the assets must be recognized in that period. A write-down may not be reversed in future periods, even though higher natural gas and oil prices may subsequently increase the ceiling. Approximately 5.8%4.9% (unaudited) of HighMount’s total proved reserves as of December 31, 20122013 are hedged by qualifying cash flow hedges, for which hedge adjusted prices were used to calculate estimated future net revenue. Future cash flows associated with settling asset retirement obligations that have been accrued in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are excluded from HighMount’s calculations of discounted cash flows under the full cost ceiling test.

Depletion of natural gas and oil producing properties is computed using the units-of-production method. Under the full cost method, the base of costs subject to depletion also includes estimated future costs to be incurred in developing proved natural gas and oil reserves, as well as capitalized asset retirement costs, net of projected salvage values. The costs of investments in unproved properties including associated exploration-related costs are initially

excluded from the depletable base. As the unproved properties are evaluated, a ratable portion of the capitalized costs is periodically reclassified to the depletable base, determined on a property by property basis, over the terms of underlying leases. Once a property has been completely evaluated, any remaining capitalized costs are then transferred to the depletable base. In addition, proceeds from the sale or other disposition of natural gas and oil properties are accounted for as reductions of capitalized cost, unless the sale would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves, in which case, a gain or loss is recognized.

Impairment of long-lived assets – The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets and intangibles with finite lives, under certain circumstances, are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value. Assets to be disposed of and assets not expected to provide any future service potential to the Company are recorded at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.

Income taxes – The Company and its eligible subsidiaries file a consolidated tax return. Deferred income taxes are recognized for temporary differences between the financial statement and tax return bases of assets and liabilities, based on enacted tax rates and other provisions of the tax law. The effect of a change in tax laws or rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period in which such change is enacted. Future tax benefits are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not, and a valuation allowance is established for any portion of a deferred tax asset that management believes may not be realized.

The Company recognizes uncertain tax positions that it has taken or expects to take on a tax return. The tax benefit of a qualifying position is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. See Note 1011 for additional information on the provision for income taxes.

Pension and postretirement benefits – The Company recognizes the overfunded or underfunded status of its defined benefit plans in Other assets or Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in funded status related to prior service costs and credits and actuarial gains and losses are recognized in the year in which the

changes occur through Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Company measures its benefit plan assets and obligations at December 31. Annual service cost, interest cost, expected return on plan assets, amortization of prior service costs and credits and amortization of actuarial gains and losses are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Stock based compensation – The Company records compensation expense upon issuance of share-based payment awards for all awards it grants, modifies repurchases or cancels primarily on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, generally three to four years. The share-based payment awards are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and highly sensitive in the valuation of these awards. These assumptions include the term that the awards are expected to be outstanding, an estimate of the volatility of the underlying stock price, applicable risk-free interest rates and the dividend yield of the Company’s stock.

The Company recognized compensation expense that decreased net income by $13$11 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.2013. For the years ended December 31, 20112012 and 20102011, the Company recognized compensation expense that decreased net income by $13 million and $12 million each year.million. Several of the Company’s subsidiaries also maintain their own stock option plans. The amounts reported above include the Company’s share of expense related to its subsidiaries’ plans.

Net income Per Share– Companies with complex capital structures are required to present basic and diluted net income per share. Basic net income per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income attributable to common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.

For each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, approximately 0.9 million, 0.8 million and 2010, approximately 0.8 million potential shares attributable to exercises under the Loews Corporation Stock Option Plan were included in the calculation of diluted net income per share. For those same periods, approximately 1.5 million, 2.6 million and 2.0 million and 2.4 million Stock

Appreciation Rights (“SARs”) were not included in the calculation of diluted net income per share due to the exercise price being greater than the average stock price.

Foreign currency – Foreign currency translation gains and losses are reflected in Shareholders’ equity as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Company’s foreign subsidiaries’ balance sheet accounts are translated at the exchange rates in effect at each year endreporting date and income statement accounts are translated at the average exchange rates. Foreign currency transaction losses of $3 million, gains of $10 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and foreign currency transaction losses of $5 million and $18 million for the years ended December 31, 20112013, 2012 and 20102011 were included in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Regulatory accounting– The majority of Boardwalk Pipeline’s operating subsidiaries are regulated by FERC. GAAP for regulated entities requires Texas Gas Transmission, LLC (“Texas Gas”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Boardwalk Pipeline, to report certain assets and liabilities consistent with the economic effect of the manner in which independent third party regulators establish rates. Accordingly, certain costs and benefits are capitalized as regulatory assets and liabilities in order to provide for recovery from or refund to customers in future periods. Regulatory accounting is not applicable to Boardwalk Pipeline’s other FERC regulated entities.

Supplementary cash flow information – Cash payments made for interest on long term debt, net of capitalized interest, amounted to $415 million, $450 million $526 million and $494$526 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. Cash payments for federal, foreign, state and local income taxes amounted to $183 million, $120 million $322 million and $378$322 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. Investing activities exclude $43 million, $35 million and $14 million of accrued capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2010 investing activities include $51 million of previously accrued capital expenditures.

Note 2.  Acquisition/DivestituresAcquisitions/Divestiture

CNA Financial

On July 2, 2012, CNA acquired Hardy Underwriting Bermuda Limited (“Hardy”), a specialized Lloyd’s of London (“Lloyd’s”) underwriter. Through Lloyd’s syndicateSyndicate 382, Hardy underwrites primarily short-tail exposures in marine and aviation, non-marine property, specialty lines and property treaty reinsurance. Hardy has business operations in the United Kingdom, Bermuda, Bahrain, Guernsey and Singapore. For the year ended December 31, 2011, Hardy reported gross written premiums of $430 million. The purchase price for Hardy was $231 million and resulted in CNA recording $55 million of identifiable indefinite-lived intangible assets, $81 million of identifiable finite-lived intangible assets and $35 million of goodwill.

In November of 2011, CNA completed the sale of its 50% ownership interest in First Insurance Company of Hawaii (“FICOH”) and received $165 million in net proceeds. This sale did not have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations.

On June 10, 2011, CNA completed the acquisition of all of the publicly traded shares of common stock of CNA Surety Corporation (“CNA Surety”) for $475 million. Prior to the acquisition, CNA owned approximately 61% of the outstanding common stock of CNA Surety.

Boardwalk Pipeline

On October 1, 2012,In 2013, Boardwalk Pipeline executed a series of agreements with the Williams Companies, Inc. (“Williams”) to develop the Bluegrass Project, a joint venture betweenproject that would develop a pipeline to transport natural gas liquids from the Marcellus and Utica shale plays to the petrochemical and export complex in the Lake Charles, Louisiana area, and the construction of related fractionation, storage and liquefied petroleum gas terminal export facilities. In connection with the transaction, Boardwalk Pipeline and Boardwalk Pipelines Holding Corp. (“BPHC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, have entered into separate joint venture arrangements for purposes of funding the project. Boardwalk Pipeline and BPHC have contributed a total of $79 million to the project as of December 31, 2013. Approval and completion of the project is subject to, among other conditions, execution of customer contracts sufficient to support the project, acquisition of right-of-way along the pipeline route, and the parties’ receipt of all necessary approvals, including board approvals and regulatory approvals, such as antitrust clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act and approvals by the FERC, among others.

On October 1, 2012, a joint venture between Boardwalk Pipeline and BPHC acquired Boardwalk Louisiana Midstream LLC, (“Louisiana Midstream”), a company that provides salt dome storage, pipeline transportation, fractionation and brine supply services, from PL Logistics LLC for approximately $620 million. The acquisition was funded with proceeds from a $225 million five-year variable rate term loan and equity contributions by BPHC of $269 million for a 65% equity interest and of $148 million by Boardwalk Pipeline for a 35% equity interest. The joint venture recorded $25 million of identifiable finite-lived intangible assets and $56$52 million of goodwill. On October 15, 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline acquired BPHC’s 65% equity interest in the joint venture for $269 million, which did not result in any significant adjustments to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December of 2011, Petal Gas Storage, LLC (formerly referred to as Boardwalk HP Storage Company, LLCLLC) (“HP Storage”Petal”) acquired seven salt dome natural gas storage caverns and associated assets in Mississippi for approximately $550 million. HP StoragePetal funded the acquisition with proceeds from a $200 million five-year variable rate term loan and equity contributions from BPHC and Boardwalk Pipeline. BPHC contributed $280 million for an 80% interest in HP StoragePetal and Boardwalk Pipeline contributed $70 million for a 20% interest. HP StoragePetal recorded $52 million of goodwill and $14 million of identifiable finite-lived intangible assets. In February of 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline acquired BPHC’s 80% interest in HP StoragePetal for $285 million, which did not result in any significant adjustments to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

HighMount

In the fourth quarter of 2011, HighMount acquired working interests in oil and gas properties located in Oklahoma. The purchase price was approximately $106 million in cash and was included primarily in the cost of unproved properties within Property, plant and equipment in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In the second quarter of 2010, HighMount completed the sale of substantially all exploration and production assets located in the Antrim Shale in Michigan and the Black Warrior Basin in Alabama for approximately $530 million. These sales did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Statements of Income. In accordance with the full cost method of accounting, proceeds from these sales were accounted for as reductions of capitalized costs.

Note 3.  Investments

Net investment income is as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31        2012               2011               2010         2013   2012   2011 

 

 
(In millions)                        

Fixed maturity securities

  $2,022      $2,011      $2,052       $      1,998     $      2,022     $2,011       

Short term investments

   12       16       22             12      16       

Limited partnership investments

   283       97       315        519      283      97       

Equity securities

   12       20       32        12      12      20       

Income (loss) from trading portfolio (a)

   52       (39)      131        90      52      (39)      

Other

   24       16       10        25      24      16       

 

 

Total investment income

   2,405       2,121       2,562        2,649      2,405      2,121       

Investment expenses

   (56)      (58)      (54)       (56)     (56)     (58)      

 

 

Net investment income

  $2,349      $2,063      $2,508       $      2,593     $      2,349     $      2,063       

 

 

 

(a)

Includes net unrealized gains (losses) related to changes in fair value on trading securities still held of $(2), $6 $(58) and $88$(58) for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company held no non-income producing fixed maturity securities. As of December 31, 2012, the Company held nine non-income producing fixed maturity securities aggregating $1 million of fair value. As of December 31, 2011, the Company held nine non-income producing fixed maturity securities aggregating $3 million of fair value. As of December 31,2013 and 2012, and 2011, no investments in a single issuer exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity other than investments in securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises.

Investment gains (losses) are as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31        2012               2011               2010         2013   2012   2011 

 

 
(In millions)                        

Fixed maturity securities

  $83      $(22)    $92       $55     $83     $(22)      

Equity securities

   (23)      (1)     (2)       (22)     (23)     (1)      

Derivative instruments

   (5)      (34)     (31)       (10)     (5)     (34)      

Short term investments and other

   2       5       (3)                              5       

 

 

Investment gains (losses) (a)

  $57      $(52)    $56       $           26     $           57     $(52)      

 

 

(a)

Includes gross realized gains of $214, $251 $299 and $525$299 and gross realized losses of $181, $191 $322 and $435$322 on available-for-sale securities for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments is as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31          2012               2011               2010            2013             2012           2011     

 

 
(In millions)                        

Fixed maturity securities

  $1,871     $1,442     $1,140         $(2,541)    $1,871     $1,442       

Equity securities

        (2)     7          (15)          (2)      

Other

   (1)     (3)     (1)           (1)     (3)      

 

 

Total net change in unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments

  $1,875     $1,437     $1,146         $    (2,556)    $1,875     $    1,437       

 

 

The components of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”)OTTI losses recognized in earnings by asset type are as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31          2012               2011               2010     

 

 
(In millions)            

Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale:

      

Corporate and other bonds

  $27     $95     $68      

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

   34        62      

Asset-backed:

      

Residential mortgage-backed

   50      105      71      

Commercial mortgage-backed

       3      

Other asset-backed

          3      

 

 

Total asset-backed

   50      111      77      

U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises

         

 

 

Total fixed maturity securities available-for-sale

   112      206      207      

 

 

Equity securities available-for-sale:

      

Common stock

             11      

Preferred stock

   36           14      

 

 

Total equity securities available-for-sale

   42           25      

 

 

Short term investments

         

 

 

Net OTTI losses recognized in earnings

  $154     $216     $232      

 

 

A security is impaired if the fair value of the security is less than its cost adjusted for accretion, amortization and previously recorded OTTI losses, otherwise defined as an unrealized loss. When a security is impaired, the impairment is evaluated to determine whether it is temporary or other-than-temporary.
Year Ended December 31      2013           2012           2011     

 

 
(In millions)            

Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale:

      

Corporate and other bonds

  $22    $27    $95      

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

     34    

Asset-backed:

      

Residential mortgage-backed

   19     50     105      

Other asset-backed

   2       6      

 

 

Total asset-backed

   21     50     111      

U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises

     1    

 

 

Total fixed maturities available-for-sale

   43     112     206      

 

 

Equity securities available-for-sale:

      

Common stock

   8     6     8      

Preferred stock

   26     36     1      

 

 

Total equity securities available-for-sale

   34     42     9      

 

 

Short term investments

   1       1      

 

 

Net OTTI losses recognized in earnings

  $78    $154    $        216      

 

 

Significant judgment is required in the determination of whether an OTTI loss has occurred for a security. CNA follows a consistent and systematic process for determining and recording an OTTI loss. CNA has established a committee responsible for the OTTI process. This committee, referred to as the Impairment Committee, is made up of three officers appointed by CNA’s Chief Financial Officer. The Impairment Committee is responsible for evaluating all securities in an unrealized loss position on at least a quarterly basis.

The Impairment Committee’s assessment of whether an OTTI loss has occurred incorporates both quantitative and qualitative information. Fixed maturity securities that CNA intends to sell, or it more likely than not will be required to sell before recovery of amortized cost, are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired and the entire difference between the amortized cost basis and fair value of the security is recognized as an OTTI loss in earnings. The remaining fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position are evaluated to determine if a credit loss exists. The factors considered by the Impairment Committee include: (i) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, (ii) whether the debtor is current on interest and principal payments, (iii) credit ratings of the

securities and (iv) general market conditions and industry or sector specific outlook. CNA also considers results and analysis of cash flow modeling for asset-backed securities, and when appropriate, other fixed maturity securities.

The focus of the analysis for asset-backed securities is on assessing the sufficiency and quality of underlying collateral and timing of cash flows based on scenario tests. If the present value of the modeled expected cash flows equals or exceeds the amortized cost of a security, no credit loss is judged to exist and the asset-backed security is deemed to be temporarily impaired. If the present value of the expected cash flows is less than amortized cost, the security is judged to be other-than-temporarily impaired for credit reasons and that shortfall, referred to as the credit component, is recognized as an OTTI loss in earnings. The difference between the adjusted amortized cost basis and fair value, referred to as the non-credit component, is recognized as OTTI in Other comprehensive income. In subsequent reporting periods, a change in intent to sell or further credit impairment on a security whose fair value has not deteriorated will cause the non-credit component originally recorded as OTTI in Other comprehensive income to be recognized as an OTTI loss in earnings.

CNA performs the discounted cash flow analysis using stressed scenarios to determine future expectations regarding recoverability. For asset-backed securities, significant assumptions enter into these cash flow projections including delinquency rates, probable risk of default, loss severity upon a default, over collateralization and interest coverage triggers and credit support from lower level tranches.

CNA applies the same impairment model as described above for the majority of non-redeemable preferred stock securities on the basis that these securities possess characteristics similar to debt securities and that the issuers maintain their ability to pay dividends. For all other equity securities, in determining whether the security is other-than-temporarily impaired, the Impairment Committee considers a number of factors including, but not limited to: (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost, (ii) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, (iii) the intent and ability of CNA to retain its investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in value and (iv) general market conditions and industry or sector specific outlook.

The amortized cost and fair values of securities are as follows:

 

December 31, 2012 Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Estimated
Fair Value
 Unrealized
OTTI Losses
(Gains)
 
December 31, 2013  Cost or
Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   Estimated
Fair Value
   Unrealized
OTTI Losses
(Gains)
 

 

 
(In millions)                               

Fixed maturity securities:

               

Corporate and other bonds

  $19,530    $2,698        $21        $22,207      $  19,352        $1,645          $135         $20,862    

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

  9,372    1,455        44        10,783      11,281     548       272        11,557    

Asset-backed:

               

Residential mortgage-backed

  5,745    246        71        5,920    $(28)         4,940     123       92        4,971      $(37)       

Commercial mortgage-backed

  1,692    147        17        1,822    (3)         1,995     90       22        2,063     (3)       

Other asset-backed

  929    23         952      945     13       3        955    

 

 

Total asset-backed

  8,366    416        88        8,694    (31)         7,880     226       117        7,989     (40)       

U.S. Treasury and obligations of government- sponsored enterprises

  172    11        1        182   

U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises

   139     6       1        144    

Foreign government

  588    25         613      531     15       3        543    

Redeemable preferred stock

  113    13        1        125      92     10         102    

 

 

Fixed maturities available-for-sale

  38,141    4,618        155        42,604    (31)         39,275     2,450       528        41,197     (40)       

Fixed maturities, trading

  183     22        161      151       28        123    

 

 

Total fixed maturities

  38,324    4,618        177        42,765    (31)         39,426     2,450       556        41,320     (40)       

 

 

Equity securities:

               

Common stock

  38    14         52      36     9         45    

Preferred stock

  190    7         197      143     1       4        140    

 

 

Equity securities available-for-sale

  228    21        -        249    -           179     10       4        185     -        

Equity securities, trading

  665    80        96        649      702     119       135        686    

 

 

Total equity securities

  893    101        96        898    -           881     129       139        871     -        

 

 

Total

 $    39,217   $    4,719       $    273       $    43,663   $    (31)         $  40,307        $  2,579          $ 695         $    42,191      $    (40)       

 

 
December 31, 2012                    

 

Fixed maturity securities:

          

Corporate and other bonds

   $   19,530        $  2,698       $21         $22,207     

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

   9,372     1,455       44         10,783     

Asset-backed:

          

Residential mortgage-backed

   5,745     246       71         5,920       $(28)       

Commercial mortgage-backed

   1,692     147       17         1,822      (3)       

Other asset-backed

   929     23         952     

 

Total asset-backed

   8,366     416       88         8,694      (31)       

U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises

   172     11       1         182     

Foreign government

   588     25         613     

Redeemable preferred stock

   113     13       1         125     

 

Fixed maturities available-for-sale

   38,141     4,618       155         42,604      (31)       

Fixed maturities, trading

   183       22         161     

 

Total fixed maturities

   38,324     4,618       177         42,765      (31)       

 

Equity securities:

          

Common stock

   38     14         52     

Preferred stock

   190     7         197     

 

Equity securities available-for-sale

   228     21       -         249      -         

Equity securities, trading

   665     80       96         649     

 

Total equity securities

   893     101       96         898      -         

 

Total

   $   39,217        $  4,719       $   273         $    43,663       $      (31)       

 

December 31, 2011 Cost or
Amortized
Cost
  Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Estimated
Fair Value
  Unrealized
OTTI Losses
(Gains)
 

 

 
(In millions)               

Fixed maturity securities:

     

Corporate and other bonds

  $19,086    $1,946      $154        $20,878   

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

  9,018    900      136        9,782   

Asset-backed:

     

Residential mortgage-backed

  5,786    172      183        5,775    $99        

Commercial mortgage-backed

  1,365    48      59        1,354    (2)       

Other asset-backed

  946    13      4        955   

 

 

Total asset-backed

  8,097    233      246        8,084    97        

U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises

  479    14       493   

Foreign government

  608    28       636   

Redeemable preferred stock

  51    7       58   

 

 

Fixed maturities available-for-sale

  37,339    3,128      536        39,931    97        

Fixed maturities, trading

  127     18        109   

 

 

Total fixed maturities

  37,466    3,128      554        40,040    97        

 

 

Equity securities:

     

Common stock

  30    17       47   

Preferred stock

  258    4      5        257   

 

 

Equity securities available-for-sale

  288    21      5        304    -        

Equity securities, trading

  614    76      67        623   

 

 

Total equity securities

  902    97      72        927    -        

 

 

Total

 $    38,368   $  3,225     $    626       $    40,967   $        97        

 

 

The available-for-sale securities in a gross unrealized loss position are as follows:

 

  

Less than

12 Months

  

12 Months

or Longer

  Total 
 

 

 

 
December 31, 2012 Estimated
Fair Value
  Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Estimated
Fair Value
  Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Estimated
Fair Value
  Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 

 

 
(In millions)                  

Fixed maturity securities:

      

Corporate and other bonds

 $846       $13       $108       $8       $954       $21        

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

  254        5        165        39        419        44        

Asset-backed:

      

Residential mortgage-backed

  583        5        452        66        1,035        71        

Commercial mortgage-backed

  85        2        141        15        226        17        

 

 

Total asset-backed

  668        7        593        81        1,261        88        

U.S. Treasury and obligations of government- sponsored enterprises

  23        1          23        1        

Redeemable preferred stock

  28        1          28        1        

 

 

Total

 $    1,819       $    27       $    866       $    128       $    2,685       $  155        

 

 

 

Less than

12 Months

 

12 Months

or Longer

 Total  

Less than

12 Months

 

12 Months

or Longer

 Total 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 
December 31, 2011 Estimated
Fair Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Estimated
Fair Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Estimated
Fair Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
December 31, 2013 Estimated
Fair Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   Estimated
  Fair Value
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Estimated
 Fair Value
 Gross
Unrealized  
Losses
 

 

 
(In millions)                          

Fixed maturity securities:

            

Corporate and other bonds

 $2,552       $126     $159       $28     $2,711     $154         $3,592         $129       $72       $6       $3,664     $135        

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

  67      1      721      135      788      136          3,251        197        129        75        3,380      272        

Asset-backed:

            

Residential mortgage-backed

  719      36      874      147      1,593      183          1,293        29        343        63        1,636      92        

Commercial mortgage-backed

  431      39      169      20      600      59          640        22          640      22        

Other asset-backed

  389      4        389      4          269        3          269      3        

 

 

Total asset-backed

  1,539      79      1,043      167      2,582      246          2,202        54        343        63        2,545      117        

U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises

  13        1          13      1        

Foreign government

  111        3          111      3        

 

 

Total fixed maturities available-for-sale

  4,158      206      1,923      330      6,081      536        

Equity securities available-for-sale:

      

Total fixed maturity securities

  9,169        384        544        144        9,713      528        

Preferred stock

  117      5        117      5          87        4          87      4        

 

 

Total

 $  4,275       $  211     $  1,923       $  330     $    6,198     $  541         $   9,256         $388       $544       $144       $9,800     $532        

 

 
December 31, 2012             

 

Fixed maturity securities:

      

Corporate and other bonds

 $846         $13       $108       $8       $954     $21        

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

  254        5        165        39        419      44        

Asset-backed:

      

Residential mortgage-backed

  583        5        452        66        1,035      71        

Commercial mortgage-backed

  85        2        141        15        226      17        

 

Total asset-backed

  668        7        593        81        1,261      88        

U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises

  23        1          23      1        

Redeemable preferred stock

  28        1          28      1        

 

Total

 $  1,819         $    27       $  866       $  128       $   2,685     $  155        

 

Based on current facts and circumstances, the Company believes the unrealized losses presented in the table above are primarily attributable to broader economic conditions, changes in interest rates and credit spreads, market illiquidity and other market factors, but are not indicative of the ultimate collectibility of the current amortized cost of the securities. The investments with longer duration, primarily included within the states, municipalities and political subdivision asset category, were more significantly impacted by changes in market interest rates. The Company has no current intent to sell these securities, nor is it more likely than not that it will be required to sell prior to recovery of amortized cost; accordingly, the Company has determined that there are no additional OTTI losses to be recorded at December 31, 2012.2013.

The following table summarizes the activity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 related to the pretax credit loss component reflected in Retained earnings on fixed maturity securities still held at December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 for which a portion of an OTTI loss was recognized in Other comprehensive income.

 

Year Ended December 31  2012   2011   2010 

 

 
(In millions)            

Beginning balance of credit losses on fixed maturity securities

  $92     $141     $164       

Additional credit losses for securities for which an OTTI loss was previously recognized

   23      39      37       

Credit losses for securities for which an OTTI loss was not previously recognized

        11      11       

Reductions for securities sold during the period

   (14)     (67)     (62)      

Reductions for securities the Company intends to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell

   (8)     (32)     (9)      

 

 

Ending balance of credit losses on fixed maturity securities

  $        95     $        92     $        141       

 

 

Year Ended December 31  2013   2012   2011         

 

 
(In millions)            

Beginning balance of credit losses on fixed maturity securities

  $95     $92     $141           

Additional credit losses for securities for which an OTTI loss was previously recognized

        23      39           

Credit losses for securities for which an OTTI loss was not previously recognized

          11           

Reductions for securities sold during the period

   (23)     (14)     (67)          

Reductions for securities the Company intends to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell

     (8)     (32)          

 

 

Ending balance of credit losses on fixed maturity securities

  $        74     $        95     $        92           

 

 

Contractual Maturity

The following table summarizes available-for-sale fixed maturity securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain securities may be called or prepaid with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single date are allocated based on weighted average life.

 

December 31 2012 2011   2013   2012 

 

 
 Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Estimated
Fair Value
 Cost or
Amortized
Cost
 Estimated
Fair Value
   Cost or
Amortized
Cost
   Estimated
Fair Value
   Cost or
Amortized
Cost
   Estimated    
Fair Value    
 

 

 
(In millions)                         

Due in one year or less

  $1,648     $1,665        $1,802   $1,812              $2,420      $2,455      $1,648      $1,665          

Due after one year through five years

  13,603      14,442        13,110    13,537             9,496       10,068       13,603       14,442          

Due after five years through ten years

  8,726      9,555        8,410    8,890             11,667       11,954       8,726       9,555          

Due after ten years

  14,164      16,942        14,017    15,692             15,692       16,720       14,164       16,942          

 

 

Total

  $  38,141     $  42,604        $  37,339   $  39,931              $  39,275      $  41,197      $  38,141      $  42,604          

 

 

Limited Partnerships

The carrying value of limited partnerships as of December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 was approximately $3.1$3.4 billion and $2.7$3.1 billion which includes undistributed earnings of $828 million$1.2 billion and $607$828 million. Limited partnerships comprising 74.0%73.6% of the total carrying value are reported on a current basis through December 31, 20122013 with no reporting lag, 13.2%12.8% are reported on a one month lag and the remainder are reported on more than a one month lag. As of December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, the Company had 8693 and 8386 active limited partnership investments. The number of limited partnerships held and the strategies employed provide diversification to the limited partnership portfolio and the overall invested asset portfolio.

Of the limited partnerships held, 79.2% and 84.1% at December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, employ hedge fund strategies that generate returns through investing in securities that are marketable while engaging in various management techniques primarily in public fixed income and equity markets. These hedge fund strategies include both long and short positions in fixed income, equity and derivative instruments. The hedge fund strategies may seek to generate gains from mispriced or undervalued securities, price differentials between securities, distressed investments, sector rotation or various arbitrage disciplines. Within hedge fund strategies, approximately 52.3%53.7% were equity related, 27.1%28.7% pursued a multi-strategy approach, 16.8%12.8% were focused on distressed investments and 3.8%4.8% were fixed income related at December 31, 2012.2013.

Limited partnerships representing 13.0%17.8% and 11.7%13.0% at December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 were invested in private debt and equity. The remaining were invested in various other partnerships including real estate. The ten largest limited partnership positions held totaled $1.6$1.7 billion and $1.3$1.6 billion as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012. Based on the most recent information available regarding the Company’s percentage ownership of the individual limited partnerships, the carrying value reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets represents approximately 4.1% of the aggregate partnership equity at December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and the related income reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Income represents approximately 3.3%3.7%, 3.9%3.3% and 3.5%3.9% of the changes in total partnership equity for all limited partnership investments for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

While the Company generally does not invest in highly leveraged partnerships, there are risks which may result in losses due to short-selling, derivatives or other speculative investment practices. The use of leverage increases volatility generated by the underlying investment strategies.

The Company’s limited partnership investments contain withdrawal provisions that generally limit liquidity for a period of thirty days up to one year and in some cases do not permit withdrawals until the termination of the partnership. Typically, withdrawals require advance written notice of up to 90 days.

Investment Commitments

As of December 31, 2012,2013, the Company had committed approximately $202$381 million to future capital calls from various third party limited partnership investments in exchange for an ownership interest in the related partnerships.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company had mortgage loan commitments of $22 million representing signed loan applications received and accepted.

The Company invests in various privately placed debt securities, including bank loans, as part of its overall investment strategy and has committed to additional future purchases, sales and funding. As of December 31, 2012,2013, the Company had commitments to purchase $185or fund additional amounts of $151 million and sell $164$145 million under the terms of such investments.securities.

Investments on Deposit

Securities with carrying values of approximately $3.6$3.3 billion and $3.5$3.6 billion were deposited by CNA’s insurance subsidiaries under requirements of regulatory authorities and others as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012.

Cash and securities with carrying values of approximately $4$353 million and $5$4 million were deposited with financial institutions as collateral for letters of credit as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012. In addition, cash and securities were deposited in trusts with financial institutions to secure reinsurance and other obligations with various third parties. The carrying values of these deposits were approximately $277$294 million and $288$277 million as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012.

Note 4.  Fair Value

Fair value is the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The following fair value hierarchy is used in selecting inputs, with the highest priority given to Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable:

 

  

Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

 

  

Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.

 

  

Level 3 – Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are not observable.

Prices may fall within Level 1, 2 or 3 depending upon the methodologies and inputs used to estimate fair value for each specific security. In general, the Company seeks to price securities using third party pricing services. Securities not priced by pricing services are submitted to independent brokers for valuation and, if those are not available, internally developed pricing models are used to value assets using methodologies and inputs the Company believes

market participants would use to value the assets. Prices obtained from third party pricing services or brokers are not adjusted by the Company.

The Company performs control procedures over information obtained from pricing services and brokers to ensure prices received represent a reasonable estimate of fair value and to confirm representations regarding whether inputs are observable or unobservable. Procedures include (i) the review of pricing service or broker pricing methodologies, (ii) back-testing, where past fair value estimates are compared to actual transactions executed in the market on similar dates, (iii) exception reporting, where changes in price, period-over-period, are reviewed and challenged with the pricing service or broker based on exception criteria, (iv) detailed analyses,analysis, where the Company independently validates information regardingperforms an independent analysis of the inputs and assumptions forused to price individual securities and (v) pricing validation, where prices received are compared to prices independently estimated by the Company.

The fair values of CNA’s life settlement contracts are included in Other assets.assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Equity options purchased are included in Equity securities, and all other derivative assets are included in Receivables. Derivative liabilities are included in Payable to brokers. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized in the tables below:

December 31, 2013    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3   Total   

 

 
(In millions)             

Fixed maturity securities:

     

Corporate and other bonds

  $33   $20,625   $204   $  20,862      

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

    11,486    71    11,557      

Asset-backed:

     

Residential mortgage-backed

    4,640    331    4,971      

Commercial mortgage-backed

    1,912    151    2,063      

Other asset-backed

    509    446    955      

 

 

Total asset-backed

    7,061    928    7,989      

U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises

   116    28     144      

Foreign government

   81    462     543      

Redeemable preferred stock

   45    57     102      

 

 

Fixed maturities available-for-sale

   275    39,719    1,203    41,197      

Fixed maturities, trading

    43    80    123      

 

 

Total fixed maturities

  $275   $  39,762   $  1,283   $41,320      

 

 

Equity securities available-for-sale

  $126   $48   $11   $185      

Equity securities, trading

   678     8    686      

 

 

Total equity securities

  $804   $48   $19   $871      

 

 

Short term investments

  $  6,162   $563    $6,725      

Other invested assets

    54     54      

Receivables

    5   $2    7      

Life settlement contracts

     88    88      

Separate account business

   9    171    1    181      

Payable to brokers

   (40  (7  (5  (52)     

December 31, 2012  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 

 

 
(In millions)                

Fixed maturity securities:

        

Corporate and other bonds

  $6      $21,982      $219      $22,207     

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

     10,687       96       10,783     

Asset-backed:

        

Residential mortgage-backed

     5,507       413       5,920     

Commercial mortgage-backed

     1,693       129       1,822     

Other asset-backed

     584       368       952     

 

 

Total asset-backed

     7,784       910       8,694     

U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises

   158       24         182     

Foreign government

   140       473         613     

Redeemable preferred stock

   40       59       26       125     

 

 

Fixed maturities available-for-sale

   344       41,009       1,251       42,604     

Fixed maturities, trading

     72       89       161     

 

 

Total fixed maturities

  $344      $  41,081      $    1,340      $  42,765     

 

 

Equity securities available-for-sale

  $117      $98      $34      $249     

Equity securities, trading

   642         7       649     

 

 

Total equity securities

  $759      $98      $41      $898     

 

 

Short term investments

  $    4,990      $799      $6      $5,795     

Other invested assets

     58       1       59     

Receivables

     32       11       43     

Life settlement contracts

       100       100     

Separate account business

   4       306       2       312     

Payable to brokers

   (95)      (11)     (6)     (112)    

December 31, 2011  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
December 31, 2012    Level 1    Level 2    Level 3  Total   

 

 
(In millions)                          

Fixed maturity securities:

             

Corporate and other bonds

    $20,396      $482      $20,878        $6   $21,982   $219   $22,207      

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

     9,611       171       9,782          10,687    96    10,783      

Asset-backed:

             

Residential mortgage-backed

     5,323   ��   452       5,775          5,507    413    5,920      

Commercial mortgage-backed

     1,295       59       1,354          1,693    129    1,822      

Other asset-backed

     612       343       955          584    368    952      

 

 

Total asset-backed

     7,230       854       8,084          7,784    910    8,694      

U.S. Treasury and obligations of government-sponsored enterprises

  $451       42         493         158    24     182      

Foreign government

   92       544         636         140    473     613      

Redeemable preferred stock

   5       53         58         40    59    26    125      

 

 

Fixed maturities available-for-sale

   548       37,876       1,507       39,931         344    41,009    1,251    42,604      

Fixed maturities, trading

     8       101       109          72    89    161      

 

 

Total fixed maturities

  $548      $  37,884      $    1,608      $  40,040        $344   $  41,081   $    1,340   $  42,765      

 

 

Equity securities available-for-sale

  $124      $113      $67      $304        $117   $98   $34   $249      

Equity securities, trading

   609         14       623         642     7    649      

 

 

Total equity securities

  $733      $113      $81      $927        $759   $98   $41   $898      

 

 

Short term investments

  $    4,570      $508      $27      $5,105        $  4,990   $799   $6   $5,795      

Other invested assets

       11       11          58    1    59      

Receivables

     79       8       87          32    11    43      

Life settlement contracts

       117       117           100    100      

Separate account business

   21       373       23       417         4    306    2    312      

Payable to brokers

   (32)      (20)      (23)      (75)        (95  (11  (6  (112)     

The tables below present reconciliations for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 20122013 and 2011:2012:

 

                   

Unrealized  

Gains  

(Losses)  

Recognized in  

Net Income  

on Level  

3 Assets and  

Liabilities  

Held at  

December 31  

 
      
                   
                   
                   
   Net Realized Gains             
   (Losses) and Net Change             
   in Unrealized Gains             
   (Losses)       Transfers Transfers   
  

 

 

        
 Balance,   Included in Included in         into out of Balance, 
2012 January 1   Net Income OCI   Purchases Sales Settlements Level 3 Level 3 December 31 

2013

 

Balance,
January 1

  

 

 

Net Realized Gains
        (Losses) and Net Change        
in Unrealized Gains
(Losses)

 

Purchases

  

    Sales

  

Settlements

  

Transfers

into

Level 3

  

Transfers

out of
Level 3

  Balance,
December 31
  

Unrealized   

Gains   

(Losses)   

Recognized in   

Net Income   

on Level   

3 Assets and   

Liabilities   

Held at   

December 31   

 
 Included in
Net Income
 

Included in

OCI

 

 

 
(In millions)                                          

Fixed maturity securities:

                    

Corporate and other bonds

 $482     $6     $4     $230     $(135)   $(88)     $45     $(325)     $219         $(3)           $219       $3       $123     $(97)   $(44)     $          51        $(51)      $204         $(2)           

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

  171        14       (89)        96           96        (2)     $4         122      (79)    (61)      18         (27)       71         

Asset-backed:

                    

Residential mortgage-backed

  452      (14)     2      97       (40)       (84)      413          (18)            413        4       (14)        116      (10)    (75)      4         (107)       331          (3)           

Commercial mortgage-backed

  59      8      14      165      (12)    (28)      13      (90)      129           129         11         107      (3)    (11)      21         (103)       151         

Other asset-backed

  343      11      8      615      (365)    (128)       (116)      368           368        5       (4)        314      (197)    (35)       (5)       446          (2)           

 

 

Total asset-backed

  854      5      24      877      (377)    (196)      13      (290)      910          (18)            910        9       (7)        537      (210)    (121)      25         (215)       928          (5)           

Redeemable preferred stock

  -       (1)     53      (26)       26           26        (1)         (25)        -         

 

 

Fixed maturities available-for-sale

  1,507      11      27      1,174      (538)    (373)      58      (615)      1,251          (21)            1,251        9       (3)        782      (386)    (251)      94         (293)       1,203          (7)           

Fixed maturities, trading

  101      (6)      1      (7)       89          (6)            89        (4)       19      (24)       80          (4)           

 

 

Total fixed maturities

 $1,608     $5     $27     $  1,175     $  (545)   $(373)     $58     $(615)     $1,340         $(27)           $1,340       $5      $(3)       $801     $     (410)   $     (251)     $94        $     (293)      $1,283         $(11)           

 

 

Equity securities available-for-sale

 $67     $(36)    $6     $27     $(16)     $(14)     $34         $(38)           $34       $(27)     $3        $2        $(1)      $11         $(27)           

Equity securities, trading

  14      (6)       (1)       7          (6)            7        (5)       6          8          (5)           

 

 

Total equity securities

 $81     $(42)    $6     $27     $(17)   $-      $-      $(14)     $41         $(44)           $41       $(32)     $3        $8     $   $-      $-        $(1)      $19         $(32)           

 

 

Short term investments

 $27       $23     $(4)   $(41)     $1      $6          $6          $(6)      $-         

Other invested assets

  11          (10)        1           1           (1)       -         

Life settlement contracts

  117     $53         (70)        100         $11             100       $13         $(25)        88         $(2)           

Separate account business

  23         (21)       2           2         $1      (2)       1         

Derivative financial instruments, net

  (15)     (4)    $30       (6)       5          (1)            5        8      $(9)        (2)         (6)        (3)         1            

                   

Unrealized  

Gains  

(Losses)  

Recognized in  

Net Income  

on Level  

3 Assets and  

Liabilities  

Held at  

December 31  

 
                   
                   
                   
   Net Realized Gains             
   (Losses) and Net Change             
   in Unrealized Gains             
   (Losses)       Transfers Transfers   
  

 

 

        
 Balance,   Included in Included in         into out of Balance, 
2011 January 1   Net Income OCI   Purchases Sales Settlements Level 3 Level 3 December 31 

2012

 

Balance,
January 1

  

 

 

 

Net Realized Gains
      (Losses) and Net Change      
in Unrealized Gains
(Losses)

 

  Purchases

  

  Sales

  

Settlements

  

Transfers

into

Level 3

  

Transfers 

out of 
Level 3 

  Balance,
December 31
  

Unrealized   

Gains   

(Losses)   

Recognized in   

Net Income   

on Level   

3 Assets and   

Liabilities   

Held at   
December 31   

 
 

Included in

Net Income

 Included in
OCI
 

 

 
(In millions)                                          

Fixed maturity securities:

                    

Corporate and other bonds

 $624     $(11)    $(1)    $484     $(204)   $(149)    $79     $(340)   $482       $(12)           $482        $6        $4       $230     $(135)   $(88)     $        45        $(325)      $219       $(3)           

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

  266       (1)     3       (92)      (5)    171        171        14      (89)       96       

Asset-backed:

                    

Residential mortgage-backed

  767      (16)     (11)     225      (290)    (60)      (163)    452        (6)           452      (14)      2       97      (40)      (84)      413       (18)           

Commercial mortgage-backed

  73      20      (7)     81      (27)      (81)    59        59      8       14       165     (12)   (28)     13        (90)      129       

Other asset-backed

  359      (9)     5      537      (341)    (99)     2      (111)    343        (5)           343      11       8       615     (365)   (128)      (116)      368       

 

 

Total asset-backed

  1,199      (5)     (13)     843      (658)    (159)     2      (355)    854        (11)           854      5       24       877     (377)   (196)     13        (290)      910       (18)           

Redeemable preferred stock

  3      3      (3)      (3)       -         -       (1)      53     (26)      26       

 

 

Fixed maturities available-for-sale

  2,092      (13)     (18)     1,330      (865)    (400)     81      (700)    1,507        (23)           1,507      11       27       1,174     (538)   (373)     58        (615)      1,251       (21)           

Fixed maturities, trading

  184      (11)       (72)       101        (4)           101      (6)       1     (7)      89       (6)           

 

 

Total fixed maturities

 $  2,276     $(24)    $(18)    $1,330     $    (937)   $(400)    $81     $(700)   $1,608       $(27)           $1,608        $5        $27       $1,175     $      (545)   $      (373)     $58        $(615)      $1,340       $      (27)           

 

 

Equity securities available-for-sale

 $26     $(2)    $2     $66     $(27)    $5     $(3)   $67       $(3)           $67        $(36)       $6       $27     $(16)     $(14)      $34       $(38)           

Equity securities, trading

  6      (7)      1        14       14        (7)           14      (6)        (1)      7       (6)           

 

 

Total equity securities

 $32     $(9)    $   $67     $(27)   $-      $19     $(3)   $81       $(10)           $81        $(42)       $6       $27     $(17)   $-      $-        $(14)      $41       $(44)           

 

 

Short term investments

 $27       $39      $(29)     $(10)   $27        $27        $23     $(4)   $(41)     $1         $6       

Other invested assets

  26     $4       $(19)       11       $1            11          (10)       1       

Life settlement contracts

  129      33         (45)       117        5            117        $53          (70)       100       $11           

Separate account business

  41         (6)      (12)    23        23         (21)      2       

Derivative financial instruments, net

  (21)     (42)    $(1)     9       40        (15)       1            (15)     (4)       $30        (6)      5       (1)           

Net realized and unrealized gains and losses are reported in Net income as follows:

 

Major Category of Assets and Liabilities  Consolidated Statements of Income Line Items

 

Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale

  Investment gains (losses)

Fixed maturity securities, trading

  Net investment income

Equity securities available-for-sale

  Investment gains (losses)

Equity securities, trading

  Net investment income

Other invested assets

  Investment gains (losses) and Net investment income

Derivative financial instruments held in a trading portfolio

  Net investment income

Derivative financial instruments, other

  Investment gains (losses) and Other revenues

Life settlement contracts

  Other revenues

Securities shown in the Level 3 tables may be transferred in or out of Level 3 based on the availability of observable market information used to determine the fair value of the security. The availability of observable market information varies based on market conditions and trading volume and may cause securities to move in and out of Level 3 from reporting period to reporting period. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the year ended December 31, 2013. There were $106 million of transfers from Level 2 to Level 1 and $72 million of transfers from Level 1 to Level 2 during the year ended December 31, 2012. There were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers between levels at the beginning of quarterly reporting periods.

Valuation Methodologies and Inputs

The following section describes the valuation methodologies and relevant inputs used to measure different financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the instruments are generally classified.

Fixed Maturity Securities

Fixed maturity securities are valued using methodologies that model information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets, as well as discounted cash flow methodologies. Common inputs include: prices from recently executed transactions of similar securities, broker/dealer quotes, benchmark yields, spreads off benchmark yields, interest rates and U.S. Treasury or swap curves. Specifically for asset-backed securities, key inputs include prepayment and default projections based on past performance of the underlying collateral and current market data.

Level 1 securities include exchange traded bonds, highly liquid U.S. and foreign government bonds, and redeemable preferred stock, valued using quoted market prices. Level 2 securities include most other fixed maturity securities as the significant inputs are observable in the marketplace. Securities are generally assigned to Level 3 in cases where broker/dealer quotes are significant inputs to the valuation and there is a lack of transparency as to whether these quotes are based on information that is observable in the marketplace. Level 3 securities also include tax-exempt auction rate certificates and private placement debt securities. Fair value of auction rate securities is determined utilizing a pricing model with three primary inputs. The interest rate and spread inputs are observable from like instruments while the expected call date assumption is unobservable due to the uncertain nature of principal prepayments prior to maturity and the credit spread adjustment that is security specific. Fair value of certain private placement debt securities is determined using internal models with inputs that are not market observable.

Equity Securities

Level 1 equity securities include publicly traded securities valued using quoted market prices. Level 2 securities are primarily non-redeemable preferred stocks and common stocks valued using pricing for similar securities, recently executed transactions, broker/dealer quotes and other pricing models utilizing market observable inputs. Level 3 securities are priced using internal models with inputs that are not market observable.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Exchange traded derivatives are valued using quoted market prices and are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 2 derivatives primarily include currency forwards valued using observable market forward rates. Over-the-counter derivatives, principally interest rate swaps, total return swaps, commodity swaps, credit default swaps, equity warrants and options, are valued using inputs including broker/dealer quotes and are classified within Level 2 or Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, depending on the amount of transparency as to whether these quotes are based on information that is observable in the marketplace.

Short Term Investments

The valuation of securitiesSecurities that are actively traded or have quoted prices are classified as Level 1. These securities include money market funds and treasury bills. Level 2 primarily includes commercial paper, for which all inputs are market observable. Fixed maturity securities purchased within one year of maturity are classified consistent with

fixed maturity securities discussed above. Short term investments as presented in the tables above differ from the amounts presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets because certain short term investments, such as time deposits, are not measured at fair value.

Life Settlement Contracts

The fair values of life settlement contracts are determined as the present value of the anticipated death benefits less anticipated premium payments based on contract terms that are distinct for each insured, as well as CNA’s own assumptions for mortality, premium expense, and the rate of return that a buyer would require on the contracts, as no comparable market pricing data is available.

Separate Account Business

Separate account business includes fixed maturity securities, equities and short term investments. The valuation methodologies and inputs for these asset types have been described above.

Significant Unobservable Inputs

The table below presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs utilized by the Company in the fair value measurements of Level 3 assets. Valuations for assets and liabilities not presented in the table below are primarily based on broker/dealer quotes for which there is a lack of transparency as to inputs used to develop the valuations. The quantitative detail of unobservable inputs from these broker quotes is neither provided nor reasonably available to the Company.

 

December 31, 2013  Fair Value   Valuation
Technique(s)
  

Unobservable

Input(s)

  

Range

(Weighted

Average)

 

 
  (In millions)           

Assets

        

Fixed maturity securities

      $142       Discounted cash flow  Credit spread   1.74% – 19.90%(3.98%)  

Equity securities

   10       Market approach  Private offering price   
 
$360.12 – $4,267.66 per
share ($1,147.95 per share)
  
  

Life settlement contracts

   88       Discounted cash flow  Discount rate risk premium   9%  
      Mortality assumption   70% – 743%(191.6%)  
December 31, 2012  Fair Value      Valuation
Technique(s)
 

Unobservable

Input(s)

 Range (Weighted
Average)
               

 

 
(In millions)            

Assets

                

Fixed maturity securities

   $      121      Discounted cash flow   Expected call date  3.3 – 5.3 years (4.3 years)        $121       Discounted cash flow  Expected call date   3.3 – 5.3 years (4.3 years)  
       Credit spread adjustment  0.02% – 0.48% (0.17%)        Credit spread adjustment   0.02% – 0.48%(0.17%)  
   72      Market approach Private offering price  $42.39 – $102.32 ($100.11)     72       Market approach  Private offering price   $42.39 – $102.32($100.11)  

Equity securities

   34      Market approach Private offering price  $4.54 – $3,842.00 per share     34       Market approach  Private offering price   $4.54 – $3,842.00 per share  
         ($571.17 per share)           ($571.17 per share)  

Life settlement contracts

   100      Discounted cash flow   Discount rate risk premium  9%     100       Discounted cash flow  Discount rate risk premium   9%  
       Mortality assumption  69% – 883% (208.9%)        Mortality assumption   69% – 883%(208.9%)  

For fixed maturity securities, an increase to the expected call date assumption and credit spread adjustment or decrease in the private offering priceassumptions would result in a lower fair value measurement. For equity securities, an increase in the private offering price would result in a higher fair value measurement. For life settlement contracts, an increase in the discount rate risk premium or decrease in the mortality assumption would result in a lower fair value measurement.

Financial Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value

The carrying amount, estimated fair value and the level of the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial instrument assets and liabilities which are not measured at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are listed in the tables below. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of short term debt and long term debt exclude capital lease obligations. The carrying amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and short term investments not carried at fair value and certain other assets and liabilities approximate fair value due to the short term nature of these items.

 

   Carrying  Estimated Fair Value 
   

 

 
December 31, 2012  Amount    Level 1    Level 2   Level 3         Total       

 

 
(In millions)                    

Financial assets:

           

Other invested assets, primarily mortgage loans

  $    401       $    418          $    418      

Financial liabilities:

           

Premium deposits and annuity contracts

   100        104           104      

Short term debt

   19     $        13         6           19      

Long term debt

   9,191      10,170         202           10,372      

 Carrying Estimated   
December 31, 2011 Amount Fair Value   

 

December 31, 2013

  Carrying   Estimated Fair Value 
Amount   Level 1    Level 2      Level 3   Total 
(In millions)                        

Financial assets:

            

Other invested assets, primarily mortgage loans

  $234     $247         $        508         $     515     $     515        

Financial liabilities:

            

Premium deposits and annuity contracts

  109      114         57         58     58        

Short term debt

  88      90         838       $      852     20     872        

Long term debt

  8,913      9,533         9,995       10,387     182     10,569        
December 31, 2012                    

Financial assets:

          

Other invested assets, primarily mortgage loans

   $        401         $     418     $     418        

Financial liabilities:

          

Premium deposits and annuity contracts

   100         104     104        

Short term debt

   19       $       13     6     19        

Long term debt

   9,191       10,170     202     10,372        

The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of these financial assets and liabilities.

The fair values of mortgage loans were based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the current interest rate for similar financial instruments, adjusted for specific loan risk.

Premium deposits and annuity contracts were valued based on cash surrender values or estimated fair values of policyholder liabilities, net of amounts ceded related to sold business.

Fair value of debt was based on observable market prices when available. When observable market prices were not available, the fair value for debt was based on observable market prices of comparable instruments adjusted for differences between the observed instruments and the instruments being valued or is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Note 5.  Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses derivatives in the normal course of business, primarily in an attempt to reduce its exposure to market risk (principally interest rate risk, credit risk, equity price risk, commodity price risk and foreign currency risk) stemming from various assets and liabilities. The Company’s principal objective under such strategies is to achieve the desired reduction in economic risk, even if the position does not receive hedge accounting treatment.

The Company enters into interest rate swaps, futures and commitments to purchase securities to manage interest rate risk. Credit derivatives such as credit default swaps are entered into to modify the credit risk inherent in certain investments. Forward contracts, futures, swaps and options are used primarily to manage foreign currency and commodity price risk.

In addition to the derivatives used for risk management purposes described above, the Company may also use derivatives for purposes of income enhancement. Income enhancement transactions are entered into with the intention of providing additional income or yield to a particular portfolio segment or asset class. Income enhancement transactions include but are not limited to interest rate swaps, call options, put options, credit default swaps, index futures and foreign currency forwards. See Note 4 for information regarding the fair value of derivative instruments.

A summary of the aggregate contractual or notional amounts and gross estimated fair values related to derivative financial instruments follows. The contractual or notional amounts for derivatives are used to calculate the exchange of contractual payments under the agreements and may not be representative of the potential for gain or loss on these instruments.

 

December 31 2012 2011   2013  2012

 
 Contractual/     Contractual/   
 Notional Estimated Fair Value Notional Estimated Fair Value 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   Contractual/        Contractual/   
 Amount     Asset         (Liability)     Amount     Asset         (Liability)       Notional     Estimated Fair Value     Notional     Estimated Fair Value   

   Amount    Asset   (Liability)  Amount  Asset  (Liability)
(In millions)                               

With hedge designation:

                        

Interest rate risk:

                        

Interest rate swaps

   $  300                  $  (6)                 $  300               $  3             $  (3)              $  300        $    (4)           $  300        $    (6)       

Commodities:

                        

Forwards – short

  288                 $  39            (3)                268            64            (22)              191     $     5      (4)           288     $    39     (3)       

Foreign exchange:

                        

Currency forwards – short

  144                4             154            1            (8)              114          (1)           144     4    

Without hedge designation:

                        

Equity markets:

                        

Options – purchased

  255                19             286            33               1,561     41         255     19    

– written

  374                 (11)                398             (23)              729        (23)           374        (11)       

Equity swaps and warrants – long

  14                6             63            16               17             14     6    

Interest rate risk:

                        

Interest rate swaps

     100            1            (1)          

Credit default swaps

                        

– purchased protection

  78                 (2)                145            8            (1)              50        (3)           78        (2)       

– sold protection

  33                 (2)                28             (2)              25           33        (2)       

Foreign exchange:

                        

Currency forwards – long

  404                 (2)                203            4               55           404        (2)       

– short

  128                  330             (2)              113           128       

Gross estimated fair values of derivative positions are currently presented in Equity securities, Receivables and Payable to brokers on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. There would be no significant difference in the balance included in such accounts if the estimated fair values were presented net for the periods ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

For derivative financial instruments without hedge designation, changes in the fair value of derivatives not held in a trading portfolio are reported in Investment gains (losses) and changes in the fair value of derivatives held for trading purposes are reported in Net investment income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Losses of $10 million, $5 million $34 million and $31$34 million were recorded in Investment gains (losses) for the years ended December 31,

2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. Losses of $26 million, $19 million $14 million and $75$14 million were included in Net investment income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

The Company’s derivative financial instruments with cash flow hedge designation hedge variable price risk associated with the purchase and sale of natural gas and other energy-related products, exposure to foreign currency losses on future foreign currency expenditures, as well as risks attributable to changes in interest rates on long term debt. GainsLosses of $19 million and gains of $43 million $33 million and $87$33 million were recognized in OCI related to these cash flow hedges for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. Gains of $19 million and $54 million and losses of $28 million and $11 million were reclassified from AOCI into income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. As of December 31, 2012,2013, the estimated amount of net unrealized gainslosses associated with these cash flow hedges that will be reclassified from AOCI into earnings during the next twelve months was $34$6 million. For each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010,2011, the net amounts recognized due to ineffectiveness were less than $1 million.

Note 6.  Receivables

 

December 31  2012     2011           2013   2012    

 

 
(In millions)                  

Reinsurance

  $6,231      $6,092          $      6,088    $     6,231        

Insurance

   1,983       1,726           2,063     1,983        

Receivable from brokers

   159       275           239     159        

Accrued investment income

   437       442           448     437        

Federal income taxes

   51       164           34     51        

Other, primarily customer accounts

   717       801           818     717        

 

 

Total

   9,578       9,500           9,690     9,578        

Less: allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance receivables

   73       91           71     73        
allowance for other doubtful accounts   139       150           258     139        

 

 

Receivables

  $       9,366      $    9,259          $9,361    $9,366        

 

 

Note 7.  Property, Plant and Equipment

 

December 31  2012     2011       2013   2012    

 

 
(In millions)                

Pipeline equipment (net of accumulated DD&A of $1,168 and $926)

  $7,148      $6,749        

Offshore drilling equipment (net of accumulated DD&A of $3,347 and $3,378)

   3,824       4,119        

Natural gas and oil proved and unproved properties (net of accumulated DD&A of $2,813 and $2,056)

   893       1,330        

Other (net of accumulated DD&A of $874 and $899)

   815       799        

Pipeline equipment (net of accumulated DD&A of $1,404 and $1,168)

  $7,232    $7,148        

Offshore drilling equipment (net of accumulated DD&A of $3,727 and $3,347)

   3,750     3,824        

Natural gas and oil proved and unproved properties (net of accumulated DD&A of $3,128 and $2,813)

   772     893        

Other (net of accumulated DD&A of $825 and $874)

   812     815        

Construction in process

   1,255       621           1,932     1,255        

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

  $   13,935      $  13,618          $    14,498    $    13,935        

 

 

DD&A expense and capital expenditures are as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012   2011   2010       2013     2012     2011 

 
      Capital       Capital       Capital     

 
  DD&A   Expend.   DD&A   Expend.   DD&A   Expend.       DD&A     Capital
Expend.
     DD&A     Capital
Expend.
     DD&A     Capital     
Expend.     
 

 

 
(In millions)                                                          

CNA Financial

   $71    $98     $70     $85     $69     $51        $72       $90       $    71        $    98        $70        $85       

Diamond Offshore

   394     721     399      783      396      399         389        987        394         721         399         783       

Boardwalk Pipeline

   256     247     231      142      222      204         275        305        256         247         231         142       

HighMount

   101     346     94      324      92      188         75        270        101         346         94         324       

Loews Hotels

   30     30     29      19      29      13         32        369        30         30         29         19       

Corporate and other

   7     10     10      19           5                       7         10         10         19       

 

 

Total

  $  859    $  1,452    $  833     $1,372     $  816     $860        $    849       $2,025       $  859        $ 1,452        $    833        $ 1,372       

 

 

Capitalized interest related to the construction and upgrade of qualifying assets amounted to approximately $99 million, $55 million $31 million and $23$31 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

Pipeline Equipment

In October of 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline acquired Louisiana Midstream, a company that provides salt dome storage, pipeline transportation, fractionation and brine supply services for approximately $620 million, of which $550 million was allocated to Pipeline equipment.

In December of 2011, HP Storage acquired seven salt dome natural gas storage caverns and associated assets in Mississippi for approximately $550 million of which $487 million was allocated to Pipeline equipment. See Note 2 for additional information related to these purchases.

Offshore Drilling Equipment

Purchase of Assets

In 20122013 and 2011,2012, Diamond Offshore recorded $251$128 million and $490$251 million in Construction in process for four new ultra-deepwater drillships. Delivery is expected in the second and fourth quarters of 2013 and in the second and fourth quarters of 2014. In addition, Diamond Offshore recorded $354 million and $235 million in Construction in process for two new deepwater floaters in 2013 and 2012. The rigs will beare being constructed utilizing the hulls of two of Diamond Offshore’s mid-water floaters. Delivery is expectedIn 2013, Diamond Offshore also recorded $195 million in Construction in process for the thirdconstruction of a harsh environment semisubmersible drilling rig, with an expected completion date in the first quarter of 2013 and in the second quarter of 2014.2016.

Sale of Assets

In 2012, Diamond Offshore sold six jack-up rigs for total proceeds of $132 million, resulting in a pretax gain of approximately $76 million, recorded in Other revenues.

Asset Impairment

In 2012, Diamond Offshore decided to actively market for sale three mid-water rigs and one jack-up rig. The aggregate net book value of these rigs was transferred to Assets held for sale which is included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In connection with the reclassification, Diamond Offshore recorded an impairment charge of $62 million related to the three mid-water rigs. The fair value for each rig was measured using an expected present value technique that utilizesutilized significant unobservable inputs, representing a Level 3 fair value measurement, which includesincluded assumptions for estimated proceeds that may be received on disposition of the rig and estimated costs to sell. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the carrying value of these assets held for salerigs amounted to $8 million and $12 million.

Natural Gas and Oil Proved and Unproved Properties

Impairment of Natural Gas and Oil Properties

In 2013 and 2012, HighMount recorded non-cash ceiling test impairment charges of $291 million and $680 million ($433186 million and $433 million after tax) related to the carrying value of its natural gas and oil properties. The impairments were recorded within Other operating expenses and as credits to Accumulated DD&A. The 2013 write-downs were primarily attributable to negative reserve revisions due to variability in well performance where HighMount is testing different horizontal target zones and hydraulic fracture designs and due to reduced average NGL prices used in the ceiling test calculations. The write-downs in 2012 were the result of significant declines in natural gas and NGL prices. Had the effects of HighMount’s cash flow hedges not been considered in calculating the ceiling limitation, the impairments would have been $301 million and $737 million ($469192 million and $469 million after tax). for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Purchase of Assets

In the fourth quarter of 2011, HighMount paid $106 million to acquire working interests in oil and gas properties located in Oklahoma. See Note 2 for additional information related to this purchase.

Costs Not Being Amortized

HighMount excludes from amortization the cost of unproved properties, the cost of exploratory wells in progress and major development projects in progress. Natural gas and oil property and equipment costs not being amortized as of December 31, 2012,2013, are as follows, by the year in which such costs were incurred:

 

          Total                   2012                   2011                   2010                   Prior                 Total      2013         2012      2011       Prior         

 

 
(In millions)                                            

Acquisition costs

  $171            $2            $56            $1            $112               $      148         $      8            $        1           $      28            $  111                

Exploration costs

   9             3             4             1             1               76         70            1           3        ��   2                

Capitalized interest

   29             8             9             7             5               35         7            7           8            13                

 

 

Total excluded costs

  $209            $13            $69            $9            $118               $      259         $    85            $        9           $      39            $  126                

 

 
Note 8. Goodwill            
  Total   CNA
Financial
   Diamond
Offshore
   Boardwalk
Pipeline
   HighMount   

Loews    

Hotels    

 

 
(In millions)                        

Balance, December 31, 2011

   $    908          $        86          $    20             $    215             $    584            $    3                

Acquisitions

   91          35           56            

Other adjustments

   (3)         (3)             

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

   996          118         20            271           584            3                

Impairments

   (636)             (52)          (584)          

Other adjustments

   (3)         1           (4)           

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

   $    357          $      119          $    20             $    215             $        -             $    3                

 

Based upon the completion of its annual goodwill impairment testing in 2013, Boardwalk Pipeline determined in the first step of the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment analysis that the carrying value of its reporting unit which included goodwill associated with the Petal acquisition as discussed in Note 2, exceeded its fair value. The fair value of the reporting unit declined from the amount determined in 2012 primarily due to the recent narrowing of time period price spreads and reduced volatility which negatively affects the value of Boardwalk Pipeline’s storage and PAL services and the cumulative effect of reduced basis spreads on the value of Boardwalk Pipeline’s transportation services. The fair value measurement of the reporting unit was derived based on judgments and assumptions which Boardwalk Pipeline believes market participants would use in assessing the fair value of the reporting unit. These judgments and assumptions which utilized significant unobservable inputs, representing a Level 3 fair value measurement, included the valuation premise, use of a discounted cash flow model to estimate fair value and inputs to the valuation model. The inputs included, but were not limited to, forecasted operating results and the long term natural gas outlook for growth in demand. Due to the results of the first step, Boardwalk Pipeline performed the second step to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to the fair value of the reporting unit’s assets and liabilities. As a result, Boardwalk Pipeline recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $52 million ($16 million after tax and noncontrolling interests) for the year ended December 31, 2013, representing the carrying value of the decline ingoodwill for the reporting unit.

Recognition of a ceiling test impairment charge is considered a triggering event for purposes of assessing any potential impairment of goodwill at HighMount under a two-step process. The first step compares HighMount’s estimated fair value to its carrying value. Due to the continued low market prices for natural gas and NGL prices,NGLs, the recent history of quarterly ceiling test write-downs during 2012 and 2013 and potential for future impairments, and negative reserve revisions recognized during 2013, HighMount changedreassessed its drilling program in 2012goodwill impairment analysis. To determine fair value, HighMount used a market approach which required significant estimates and assumptions and utilized significant unobservable inputs, representing a Level 3 fair value measurement. These estimates and assumptions primarily included, but were not limited to, develop propertiesearnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, production and reserves, control premium, discount rates and required capital expenditures. These valuation techniques were based on analysis of comparable public companies, adjusted for HighMount’s growth profile. In the first step, HighMount determined that produce primarily oil.its carrying value exceeded its fair value requiring HighMount to perform the second step and to estimate the fair value of its assets and liabilities. The carrying value of goodwill is limited to the amount that HighMount’s estimated fair value exceeds the fair value of assets and liabilities. As a result, during 2012, $130HighMount recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $584 million ($382 million after tax) for the year ended December 31, 2013, consisting of costs associated with unevaluated natural gas prospects were reclassified as evaluated and included inall of its remaining goodwill.

Based on the full cost pool subject to depletion.results of the annual impairment tests for all other reporting units, the Company concluded that the fair values of all other reporting units significantly exceeded their carrying values, no other goodwill impairment existed at December 31, 2013.

Note 8.9.  Claim and Claim Adjustment Expense Reserves

CNA’s property and casualty insurance claim and claim adjustment expense reserves represent the estimated amounts necessary to resolve all outstanding claims, including claims that are incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) as of the reporting date. CNA’s reserve projections are based primarily on detailed analysis of the facts in each case, CNA’s experience with similar cases and various historical development patterns. Consideration is given to such historical patterns as field reserving trends and claims settlement practices, loss payments, pending levels of unpaid claims and product mix, as well as court decisions, economic conditions including inflation and public attitudes. All of these factors can affect the estimation of claim and claim adjustment expense reserves.

Establishing claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, including claim and claim adjustment expense reserves for catastrophic events that have occurred, is an estimation process. Many factors can ultimately affect the final settlement of a claim and, therefore, the necessary reserve. Changes in the law, results of litigation, medical costs, the cost of repair materials and labor rates can all affect ultimate claim costs. In addition, time can be a critical part of reserving determinations since the longer the span between the incidence of a loss and the payment or settlement of the claim, the more variable the ultimate settlement amount can be. Accordingly, short-tail claims, such as property damage claims, tend to be more reasonably estimable than long-tail claims, such as workers’ compensation, general liability and professional liability claims. Adjustments to prior year reserve estimates, if necessary, are reflected in the results of operations in the period that the need for such adjustments is determined. There can be no assurance that CNA’s ultimate cost for insurance losses will not exceed current estimates.

Catastrophes are an inherent risk of the property and casualty insurance business and have contributed to material period-to-period fluctuations in CNA’s results of operations and/or equity. CNA reported catastrophe losses, net of

reinsurance, of $169 million, $391 million $222 million and $121$222 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. Catastrophe losses in 2012 related primarily toincluded Storm Sandy and other U.S. storms.Sandy.

The table below provides a reconciliation between beginning and ending claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, including claim and claim adjustment expense reserves of the life company:

 

Year Ended December 31      2012          2011          2010     

 

 
(In millions)          

Reserves, beginning of year:

    

Gross

      $24,303       $25,496       $26,816       

Ceded

   5,020    6,122    5,594       

 

 

Net reserves, beginning of year

   19,283    19,374    21,222       

 

 

Reduction of net reserves due to the Loss Portfolio Transfer transaction

     (1,381)      

 

 

Change in net reserves due to acquisition (disposition) of subsidiaries

   291    (277  (98)      

 

 

Net incurred claim and claim adjustment expenses:

    

Provision for insured events of current year

   5,273    4,904    4,741       

Decrease in provision for insured events of prior years

   (182  (429  (544)      

Amortization of discount

   145    135    123       

 

 

Total net incurred (a)

   5,236    4,610    4,320       

 

 

Net payments attributable to:

    

Current year events

   (988  (1,029  (908)      

Prior year events

   (4,280  (3,473  (3,776)      

 

 

Total net payments

   (5,268  (4,502  (4,684)      

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment and other

   95    78    (5)      

 

 

Net reserves, end of year

   19,637    19,283    19,374       

Ceded reserves, end of year

   5,126    5,020    6,122       

 

 

Gross reserves, end of year

      $    24,763       $    24,303       $    25,496       

 

 

(a)

Total net incurred above does not agree to Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits as reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income due to amounts related to uncollectible reinsurance and loss deductible receivables, and benefit expenses related to future policy benefits and policyholders’ funds, which are not reflected in the table above.

The changes in provision for insured events of prior years (net prior year claim and claim adjustment expense reserve development) were as follows:

Year Ended December 31    2013     2012   2011

(In millions)               

Reserves, beginning of year:

          

Gross

    $24,763      $24,303    $    25,496     

Ceded

     5,126       5,020    6,122     

Net reserves, beginning of year

     19,637       19,283    19,374     

Change in net reserves due to acquisition (disposition) of subsidiaries

         291    (277)    

Net incurred claim and claim adjustment expenses:

          

Provision for insured events of current year

     5,114       5,273    4,904     

Decrease in provision for insured events of prior years

     (115     (182  (429)    

Amortization of discount

     154       145    135     

Total net incurred (a)

     5,153       5,236    4,610     

Net payments attributable to:

          

Current year events

     (981     (988  (1,029)    

Prior year events

     (4,588     (4,280  (3,473)    

Total net payments

     (5,569     (5,268  (4,502)    

Foreign currency translation adjustment and other

     (104     95    78     

Net reserves, end of year

     19,117       19,637    19,283     

Ceded reserves, end of year

     4,972       5,126    5,020     

Gross reserves, end of year

    $    24,089      $  24,763    $    24,303     

(a) Total net incurred above does not agree to Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits as reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income due to amounts related to retroactive reinsurance deferred gain accounting, uncollectible reinsurance and loss deductible receivables, and benefit expenses related to future policy benefits and policyholders’ funds, which are not reflected in the table above.

(a) Total net incurred above does not agree to Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits as reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income due to amounts related to retroactive reinsurance deferred gain accounting, uncollectible reinsurance and loss deductible receivables, and benefit expenses related to future policy benefits and policyholders’ funds, which are not reflected in the table above.

The changes in provision for insured events of prior years (net prior year claim and claim adjustment expense reserve development) were as follows:

The changes in provision for insured events of prior years (net prior year claim and claim adjustment expense reserve development) were as follows:

Year Ended December 31      2012         2011         2010         2013     2012   2011

 

(In millions)                       

Property and casualty reserve development

      $(180     $(429     $(545)          $(115    $(180)     $       (429)    

Life reserve development in life company

   (2   1                (2)     

 

Total

      $     (182     $     (429     $     (544)           $(115    $(182)     $       (429)    

 

The following tables summarize the gross and net carried reserves:

 

December 31, 2012  CNA
Specialty
   CNA
Commercial
   Life &
Group
Non-Core
   Other   Total 
December 31, 2013  CNA
Specialty
   CNA
Commercial
   Life &
Group
Non-Core
   Other   Total   

 

 
(In millions)                                        

Gross Case Reserves

  $2,292      $6,146        $2,690      $  1,540    $  12,668         $    2,270       $    5,829         $      2,748        $      1,415     $  12,262      

Gross IBNR Reserves

   4,456     5,180        316      2,143     12,095         4,419       4,820         310        2,278     11,827      

 

 

Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim

                    

Adjustment Expense Reserves

  $6,748      $11,326        $3,006      $3,683    $24,763         $    6,689       $  10,649         $      3,058        $      3,693     $  24,089      

 

 

Net Case Reserves

  $2,008      $5,611        $2,253      $484    $10,356         $    2,024       $    5,358         $      2,352        $         442     $  10,176      

Net IBNR Reserves

   4,104     4,600        275      302     9,281         4,142       4,269         271        259     8,941      

 

 

Total Net Carried Claim and Claim

                    

Adjustment Expense Reserves

  $6,112      $10,211        $2,528      $786    $19,637         $    6,166       $    9,627         $      2,623        $         701     $  19,117      

 

 
December 31, 2011                    
December 31, 2012                    

 

 

Gross Case Reserves

  $2,441      $6,266        $2,510      $1,321    $12,538         $    2,292       $    6,146         $      2,690        $      1,540     $  12,668      

Gross IBNR Reserves

   4,399     5,243        315      1,808     11,765         4,456       5,180         316        2,143     12,095      

 

 

Total Gross Carried Claim and Claim

                    

Adjustment Expense Reserves

  $6,840      $11,509        $2,825      $3,129    $24,303         $    6,748       $  11,326         $      3,006        $      3,683     $  24,763      

 

 

Net Case Reserves

  $2,086      $5,720        $2,025      $347    $10,178         $    2,008       $    5,611         $      2,253        $         484     $  10,356      

Net IBNR Reserves

   3,937     4,670        254      244     9,105         4,104       4,600         275        302     9,281      

 

 

Total Net Carried Claim and Claim

                    

Adjustment Expense Reserves

  $6,023      $10,390        $2,279      $591    $19,283         $    6,112       $  10,211         $      2,528        $         786     $  19,637      

 

 

A&EP Reserves

On August 31, 2010, Continental Casualty Company (“CCC”) together with several of CNA’s insurance subsidiaries completed a transaction with National Indemnity Company (“NICO”), a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., under which substantially all of CNA’s legacy A&EP liabilities were ceded to NICO (“Loss Portfolio Transfer”).

Under the terms of the NICO transaction, effective January 1, 2010 CNA ceded approximately $1.6 billion of net A&EP claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves to NICO under a retroactive reinsurance agreement with an aggregate limit of $4.0 billion. Included in the $1.6 billion of net A&EP claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves was approximately $90 million of net claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves relating to CNA’s discontinued operations. The $1.6 billion of claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves ceded to NICO was net of $1.2 billion of ceded claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves under existing third party reinsurance contracts. The NICO aggregate reinsurance limit also covers credit risk on the existing third party reinsurance related to these liabilities.

CNA paid NICO a reinsurance premium of $2.0 billion and transferred to NICO billed third party reinsurance receivables related to A&EP claims with a net book value of $215 million (net of an allowance of $100 million for doubtful accounts on billed third party reinsurance receivables, as discussed further below). As of August 31, 2010, NICO deposited approximately $2.2 billion in a collateral trust account as security for its obligations to CNA. NICO may reduce the collateral by the amount of net A&EP claim and allocated claim adjustment expense payments. In addition, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. guaranteed the payment obligations of NICO up to the full aggregate reinsurance

limit as well as certain of NICO’s performance obligations under the trust agreement. NICO is responsible for claims handling and billing and collection from third party reinsurers related to CNA’s A&EP claims.

The following table displays the impact of the Loss Portfolio Transfer on the 2010 Consolidated Statement of Income:

2010   

(In millions)

Other operating expenses

$(529)      

Income tax benefit

185       

Loss from continuing operations, included in the Other segment

(344)      

Loss from discontinued operations

(21)      

Net loss

(365)      

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

37       

Net loss attributable to Loews Corporation

$     (328)      

In connection with the transfer of billed third party reinsurance receivables related to A&EP claims and the coverage of credit risk afforded under the terms of the Loss Portfolio Transfer, CNA reduced its allowance for doubtful accounts on billed third party reinsurance receivables and ceded claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves by $200 million. This reduction is reflected in Other operating expenses presented above.

The Loss Portfolio Transfer is considered a retroactive reinsurance contract. In the event that the cumulative claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses ceded under the Loss Portfolio Transfer exceed the consideration paid, the resulting gain from such excess would be deferred. A cumulative amortization adjustment would be recognized in earnings in the period such excess arises so that the resulting deferred gain would reflect the balance that would have existed if the revised estimate was available at the inception date of the Loss Portfolio Transfer. This accounting generally results in a reserve charge because of the timing difference between the recognition of the gross adverse reserve development and the related ceded reinsurance benefit. However, there is no economic impact as long as the additional losses are within the limit under the contract.

The remaining amount available under the $4.0 billion aggregate limit of the Loss Portfolio Transfer was $2.0 billion on an incurred basis at December 31, 2012. This incurred amount includes $399 million of adverse prior year development since the contract effective date of January 1, 2010. Any future adverse prior year development in excess of approximately $230 million would put the Loss Portfolio Transfer into an overall gain position under retroactive reinsurance accounting. The net ultimate paid losses ceded under the Loss Portfolio Transfer were $661 million through December 31, 2012. The fair value of the collateral trust account at December 31, 2012 was $2.5 billion.

Net Prior Year Development

Changes in estimates of claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves and premium accruals, net of reinsurance, for prior years are defined as net prior year development. These changes can be favorable or unfavorable. The following tables and discussion include the net prior year development recorded for CNA Specialty, CNA Commercial and Other segments for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010. The net prior year development presented below includes premium development due to its direct relationship to claim and claim adjustment expense reserve development. The net prior year development presented below also includes the impact of commutations and write-offs, but excludes the impact of increases or decreases in the allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance receivables. See Note 16 for further discussion of the allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance receivables.2011.

Favorable net prior year development of $9 million, $11 million $29 million and $2$29 million was recorded in the Life & Group Non-Core segment for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2012  CNA
Specialty
     CNA
Commercial
     Other     Total 
Year Ended December 31, 2013  CNA
Specialty
   CNA
Commercial
   Other   Total   

 

 
(In millions)                                      

Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development

  $    (135)        $      (46)        $(24)      $    (205)       $      (230)        $          104        $           8      $      (118)    

Pretax (favorable) unfavorable premium development

   (15)       (35)                (46)       (17)        (9)       (16)     (42)    

 

 

Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development

  $     (150)        $      (81)        $        (20)      $     (251)       $      (247)        $            95        $          (8)     $      (160)    

 

 
Year Ended December 31, 2012                

 

Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development

   $      (135)        $          (46)       $        (24)     $      (205)    

Pretax (favorable) unfavorable premium development

   (15)        (35)            (46)    

 

Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development

   $      (150)        $          (81)       $        (20)     $      (251)    

 
Year Ended December 31, 2011                

 

Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development

   $      (217)        $        (204)       $          (2)     $      (423)    

Pretax (favorable) unfavorable premium development

   (28)        21        (1)     (8)    

 

Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development

   $      (245)        $        (183)       $          (3)     $      (431)    

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013, favorable premium development for Other is primarily due to a commutation recorded at Hardy.

Year Ended December 31, 2011                      

 

 

Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development

  $    (217)        $      (204)        $          (2)      $    (423)    

Pretax (favorable) unfavorable premium development

   (28)       21          (1)       (8)    

 

 

Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development

  $     (245)        $    (183)        $          (3)      $     (431)    

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2010                      

 

 

Pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development

  $    (341)        $      (304)        $      $(637)    

Pretax (favorable) unfavorable premium development

   (3)       48                    (2)       43     

 

 

Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year development

  $     (344)        $     (256)        $        6       $     (594)    

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2012, favorable premium development was recorded for CNA Commercial primarily due to premium adjustments on auditable policies arising from increased exposures.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, favorable premium development was recorded for CNA Specialty primarily due to changes in estimates of exposures in medical professional liability tail coverages. Unfavorable premium development for CNA Commercial was recorded due to a further reduction of ultimate premium estimates relating to retrospectively rated policies, partially offset by premium adjustments on auditable policies due to increased exposures.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, unfavorable premium development for CNA Commercial was recorded due to a change in ultimate premium estimates relating to retrospectively rated policies and return premium on auditable policies due to reduced exposures.

CNA Specialty

The following table and discussion provide further detail of the net prior year claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development (“development”) recorded for the CNA Specialty segment:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012   2011   2010           2013         2012         2011         

 

 
(In millions)                          

Medical professional liability

  $(32)    $(92)    $(98)          $(35  $(32  $(92)        

Other professional liability

   (22)     (78)     (129)      

Other professional liability and management liability

     (101   (22   (78)        

Surety

   (63)     (47)     (103)           (74   (63   (47)        

Warranty

   (5)     (13)         (3   (5   (13)        

Other

   (13)     13      (11)           (17   (13   13         

 

 

Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development

  $      (135)    $      (217)    $      (341)          $(230  $(135  $(217)        

 

 

2013

Overall, favorable development for medical professional liability reflects favorable experience in accident years 2009 and prior. Unfavorable development was recorded for accident years 2010 and 2011 due to higher than expected large loss activity.

Overall, favorable development for other professional liability and management liability was related to better than expected loss emergence in accident years 2010 and prior. Unfavorable development was recorded in accident year 2011 related to an increase in severity in management liability.

Favorable development for surety coverages was primarily due to better than expected large loss emergence in accident years 2011 and prior.

Other includes standard property and casualty coverages provided to CNA Specialty customers. Favorable development for other coverages was primarily due to better than expected loss emergence in property coverages primarily in accident years 2010 and subsequent.

2012

Favorable development for medical professional liability was primarily due to better than expected loss emergence in accident years 2008 and prior.

Overall, favorable development for other professional liability and management liability was primarily due to better than expected loss emergence in accident years 2003 through 2007. Unfavorable development was recorded in CNA’s lawyer coverages in accident years 2010 and 2011 primarily due to increased frequency and severity.

Favorable development for surety coverages was primarily due to better than expected loss emergence in accident years 2010 and prior.

Other includes standard property and casualty coverages provided to CNA Specialty customers. Overall, favorable development for other coverages was primarily due to favorable loss emergence in property and workers’ compensation coverages in accident years 2005 and subsequent. Unfavorable development was recorded in accident year 2009 primarily due to an unfavorable outcome on an individual general liability claim.

2011

Favorable development for medical professional liability was primarily due to favorable case incurred emergence in nurses, physicians, excess institutions and primary institutions in accident years 2008 and prior.

Favorable development for other professional liability and management liability was driven by better than expected loss emergence in the life agents, accountants, and architects & engineers business in accident years 2008 and prior. In addition, favorable development in CNA’s European book of business was primarily due to favorable outcomes on several large losses in financial directors and officers (“D&O”) and errors and omissions (“E&O”) coverages in accident years 2003 and prior.

Favorable development for surety coverages was primarily due to a decrease in the estimated loss on a large national contractor in accident year 2005 and better than expected loss emergence in accident years 2009 and prior.

Favorable development in warranty was driven by favorable policy year experience on an aggregate stop loss policy covering CNA’s non-insurance warranty subsidiary.

Unfavorable development for other coverages was primarily due to increased frequency of large claims in auto and workers’ compensation coverages in accident years 2009 and 2010.

2010

Overall, favorable development for medical professional liability was primarily due to lower than expected frequency of large losses, primarily in accident years 2007 and prior. This development amount also included unfavorable development in accident years 2008 and 2009 due to increased frequency of large losses related to medical products.

Overall, favorable development for other professional liability was recorded primarily in accident years 2007 and prior in D&O and E&O coverages due to several factors, including reduced frequency of large claims and the result of reviews of large claims. This development amount also included unfavorable development in employment practices liability, E&O and D&O coverages recorded in accident years 2008 and 2009, driven by the economic recession and higher unemployment.

Favorable development for surety coverages was primarily due to a decrease in the estimated loss on a large national contractor in accident year 2005 and lower than expected claim emergence in accident years 2008 and prior.

CNA Commercial

The following table and discussion providesprovide further detail of the development recorded for the CNA Commercial segment:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012     2011     2010       2013   2012   2011 

 

 
(In millions)                              

Commercial auto

   $          27        $        (98)       $        (88)          $15    $         27    $(98)         

General liability

   (64)       (39)       (59)           59     (64   (39)         

Workers’ compensation

   15        36        47            92     15     36          

Property and other

   (24)       (103)       (204)           (62   (24   (103)         

 

 

Total pretax (favorable) unfavorable net prior year claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserve development

   $        (46)       $      (204)       $      (304)          $      104    $(46  $      (204)         

 

 

2013

Unfavorable development for commercial auto coverages was primarily due to higher than expected frequency in accident years 2011 and 2012 and large loss emergence in accident years 2009 and 2010.

Unfavorable development for general liability coverages was primarily related to increased incurred loss severity in accident years 2010 through 2012.

Unfavorable development for workers’ compensation includes CNA’s response to legislation enacted during 2013 related to the New York Fund for Reopened Cases. The law change necessitated an increase in reserves as re-opened workers’ compensation claims can no longer be turned over to the state for handling and payment after December 31, 2013. Additional unfavorable development was recorded in accident year 2012 related to increased frequency and severity on claims related to Defense Base Act contractors and in accident year 2010 due to higher than expected large losses and increased severity in the state of California.

Favorable development for property and other coverages was primarily related to favorable outcomes on litigated catastrophe claims in accident years 2005 and 2010 as well as favorable loss emergence in non-catastrophe losses in accident years 2010 through 2012.

2012

Unfavorable development for commercial auto coverages was primarily due to higher than expected loss emergence in accident years 2007 and subsequent and higher than expected frequency in accident year 2011.

Overall, favorable development for general liability coverages was primarily due to better than expected loss emergence in accident years 2006 and subsequent related to umbrella business and 2003 and prior related to large account business. Unfavorable development was recorded in accident years 2009 through 2011 related to several large losses.

Overall, unfavorable development for workers’ compensation was primarily due to increased medical severity in accident years 2010 and 2011 and the recognition of losses related to favorable premium development in accident year 2011. Favorable development was recorded in accident years 2001 and prior reflecting favorable experience.

Overall, favorable development for property and marineother coverages was due to a favorable outcome on an individual claim in accident year 2005 and favorable loss emergence in non-catastrophe losses in accident years 2009 and 2010. Unfavorable development was recorded in accident year 2011 related to several large losses.

2011

Favorable development for commercial auto coverages was due to lower than expected severity on bodily injury claims and favorable claim emergence on umbrella policies in accident years 2006 and prior.

Favorable development in the general liability coverages was primarily due to favorable claim emergence in accident years 2007 and prior related to both primary and umbrella liability coverages.

Unfavorable development for workers’ compensation was related to increased medical severity in accident year 2010.

Overall, favorable development for property and other coverages was due to decreased frequency of large losses in commercial multi-peril coverages primarily in accident year 2010, favorable loss emergence related to catastrophe claims in accident year 2008 and favorable loss emergence related to non-catastrophe claims in accident years 2010 and prior. This development amount also included unfavorable development related to unallocated claim adjustment expenses.

2010A&EP Reserves

Favorable development for commercial auto coveragesIn 2010, Continental Casualty Company (“CCC”) together with several of CNA’s insurance subsidiaries completed a transaction with National Indemnity Company (“NICO”), a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., under which substantially all of CNA’s legacy A&EP liabilities were ceded to NICO (“Loss Portfolio Transfer” or “LPT”). Under the terms of the NICO transaction, CNA ceded approximately $1.6 billion of net A&EP claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves to NICO under a retroactive reinsurance agreement with an aggregate limit of $4.0 billion. The $1.6 billion of claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves ceded to NICO was primarily duenet of $1.2 billion of ceded claim and allocated claim adjustment expense reserves under existing third party reinsurance contracts. The NICO aggregate reinsurance limit also covers credit risk on the existing third party reinsurance related to lower than expected frequencythese liabilities. CNA paid NICO a reinsurance premium of $2.0 billion and severity trendstransferred to NICO billed third party reinsurance receivables related to A&EP claims with a net book value of $215 million, resulting in accident years 2009total consideration of $2.2 billion.

The following table displays the impact of the Loss Portfolio Transfer on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Year Ended December 31    2013       2012       2011          

 

 
(In millions)                  

Net A&EP adverse development before consideration of LPT

    $      363      $      261      $        84         

Provision for uncollectible third party reinsurance on A&EP

     140          

 

 

Additional amounts ceded under LPT

     503       261       84         

Retroactive reinsurance benefit recognized

     (314     (261     (84)        

 

 

Pretax impact of unrecognized deferred retroactive reinsurance benefit

    $    189      $-      $-         

 

 

During 2013, 2012 and prior.

Overall, favorable development for general liability and umbrella coverages was primarily due to better than expected loss emergence in accident years 2006 and prior. This development amount also included2011, unfavorable development primarily driven by increased claim frequency in accident years 2004 and prior for excess workers’ compensation and in accident years 2008 and 2009 for a portion of CNA’s primary casualty surplus lines book. Unfavorable development was also recorded for accident years 2000 and prior to 2001 related to mass tortA&EP claims primarily as a result of increased defense costs on specific mass tort accounts, including amounts related to unallocated claim adjustment expenses.

Unfavorable development in workers’ compensation was related to increased severity of indemnity losses relative to expectations on claims related to Defense Base Act contractors, primarily in accident years 2008 and prior.

Favorable development was recorded for property and marine coverages. Favorable development on catastrophe claims was due to loweran increase in ultimate claim severity and higher than expected incurred loss emergence, primarily in accident years 2008 and 2009. Favorable non-catastrophe development was due to lower than expected severity in accident years 2009 and prior. Favorable development in marine business was primarily due to decreasedanticipated claim frequency and favorable cargo salvage recoveries in recent accident yearsreporting, as well as lower thanincreased defense costs. Additionally, in 2013 CNA recognized a provision for uncollectible third party reinsurance which increased the expected severityrecovery from NICO.

The Loss Portfolio Transfer is a retroactive reinsurance contract. In the event that the cumulative claim and allocated claim adjustment expenses ceded under the Loss Portfolio Transfer exceed the consideration paid, the resulting gain from such excess is deferred. A portion of the deferred gain is cumulatively recognized in earnings in the period such excess arises as if the revised estimate was available at the inception date of the Loss Portfolio Transfer.

In the fourth quarter of 2013, the cumulative amounts ceded under the Loss Portfolio Transfer of $2.5 billion exceeded the $2.2 billion consideration paid, resulting in a $189 million deferred retroactive reinsurance gain in Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Income. This deferred benefit will be recognized in earnings in future periods in proportion to actual recoveries under the Loss Portfolio Transfer. Over the life of the contract, there is no economic impact as long as any additional losses are within the limit under the contract.

NICO established a collateral trust account as security for excess liability in accident years 2005its obligations to CNA. The fair value of the collateral trust account at December 31, 2013 was $3.1 billion. In addition, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. guaranteed the payment obligations of NICO up to the full aggregate reinsurance limit as well as certain of NICO’s performance obligations under the trust agreement. NICO is responsible for claims handling and prior. Favorable propertybilling and marine development incollection from third party reinsurers related to CNA’s European operation was due to lower than expected frequency of large claims primarily in accident year 2009.A&EP claims.

Note 9.10.  Leases

Leases cover office facilities, machinery and computer equipment. The Company’s hotels in some instances are constructed on leased land. Rent expense amounted to $92 million, $96 million $91 million and $92$91 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. The table below presents the future minimum lease payments to be made under non-cancelable operating leases along with lease and sublease minimum receipts to be received on owned and leased properties.

 

   Future Minimum Lease 
Year Ended December 31      Payments  Receipts     

 

 
(In millions)       

2013

      $66           $        2              

2014

   58         

2015

   49         

2016

   45         

2017

   35         

Thereafter

   146         

 

 

Total

      $      399           $        2              

 

 

       Future Minimum Lease  
  

 

 

 
Year Ended December 31      Payments    Receipts     

 

 
(In millions)       

2014

      $66         $2             

2015

   60         

2016

   53         

2017

   42         

2018

   35         

Thereafter

   127         

 

 

Total

      $    383         $    2             

 

 

Note 10.11.  Income Taxes

The Company and its eligible subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. The Company has entered into a separate tax allocation agreement with CNA, a majority-owned subsidiary in which its ownership exceeds 80%. The agreement provides that the Company will: (i) pay to CNA the amount, if any, by which the Company’s consolidated federal income tax is reduced by virtue of inclusion of CNA in the Company’s return or (ii) be paid by CNA an amount, if any, equal to the federal income tax that would have been payable by CNA if it had filed a separate consolidated return. The agreement may be canceled by either of the parties upon thirty days written notice.

For 20102011 through 2012,2013, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has accepted the Company into the Compliance Assurance Process (“CAP”), which is a voluntary program for large corporations. Under CAP, the IRS conducts a real-time audit and works contemporaneously with the Company to resolve any issues prior to the filing of the tax

return. The Company believes this approach should reduce tax-related uncertainties, if any. Although the outcome of tax audits is always uncertain, the Company believes that any adjustments resulting from audits will not have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position and cash flows. The Company and/or its subsidiaries also file income tax returns in various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. These returns, with few exceptions, are no longer subject to examination by the various taxing authorities before 2008.2009.

Diamond Offshore, which is not included in the Company’s consolidated federal income tax return, files income tax returns in the U.S. federal, various state and foreign jurisdictions. The examination of Diamond Offshore’s 2009 and 2011 U.S. federal income tax returns remain subject to examination. The 2010 federal income tax return is currently under examination.was completed during 2013. Tax years that remain subject to examination by the various other jurisdictions include years 2003 to 2011.2012.

The current and deferred components of income tax expense (benefit), excluding taxes on discontinued operations, are as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012      2011     2010     

 

 
(In millions)                

Income tax expense (benefit):

          

Federal:

          

Current

  $183       $127      $154          

Deferred

   (18)       246       465          

State and city:

          

Current

   19        10       21          

Deferred

   (5)       14       15          

Foreign

   110        135       239          

 

 

Total

  $      289       $      532      $      894          

 

 

Year Ended December 31  2013   2012   2011          

 

 
(In millions)            

Income tax expense (benefit):

      

Federal:

      

Current

  $171    $183    $127           

Deferred

   15     (18   246           

State and city:

      

Current

   19     19     10           

Deferred

   (8   (5   14           

Foreign

   163     110     135           

 

 

Total

  $     360    $     289    $     532           

 

 

The components of U.S. and foreign income before income tax and a reconciliation between the federal income tax expense at statutory rates and the actual income tax expense is as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012   2011   2010         2013   2012   2011          

 

 
(In millions)                        

Income before income tax:

            

U.S.

  $911     $1,466     $     2,236         $1,097    $911    $1,466           

Foreign

   488      760      666          332     488     760           

 

 

Total

  $     1,399     $    2,226     $2,902         $  1,429    $  1,399    $  2,226           

 

 

Income tax expense at statutory rate

  $490     $779     $1,016         $500    $490    $779           

Increase (decrease) in income tax expense resulting from:

            

Exempt investment income

   (86)     (76)     (85)         (99   (86   (76)          

Foreign related tax differential

   (152)     (203)     (105)         (117   (152   (203)          

Amortization of deferred charges associated with intercompany rig sales to other tax jurisdictions

   31      30      30          31     31     30           

Taxes related to domestic affiliate

   25      55      34          19     25     55           

Partnership earnings not subject to taxes

   (43)     (27)     (33)         (38   (43   (27)          

Unrecognized tax benefit

        (8)     31       

Unrecognized tax benefit (expense)

   66     6     (8)          

Other (a)

   18      (18)     6          (2   18     (18)          

 

 

Income tax expense

  $289     $532     $894         $360    $289    $532           

 

 

 

(a)

Includes state and local taxes, retroactive tax law changes, adjustments to prior year estimates and other non-deductible expenses.

Provision has been made for the expected U.S. federal income tax liabilities applicable to undistributed earnings of subsidiaries, except for certain subsidiaries for which the Company intends to invest the undistributed earnings indefinitely to finance foreign activities, or recover such undistributed earnings tax-free. The determination of the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability on approximately $2.0$2.4 billion of undistributed earnings related to foreign subsidiaries is not practicable.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding tax carryforwards and interest and penalties, is as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012   2011               2013       2012   2011   

 

 
(In millions)                    

Balance at January 1

  $        41     $        46         $67    $63    $75       

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

        1          2     4     1       

Additions for tax positions related to a prior year

          31     5    

Reductions for tax positions related to a prior year

   (2)     (2)         (7   (5   (5)      

Lapse of statute of limitations

     (4)         (2     (8)      

 

 

Balance at December 31

  $        48     $41         $              91    $              67    $              63       

 

 

At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, there were$76 million, $48 million and $41 million of unrecognized tax benefits related to Diamond Offshore that if recognized would affect the effective tax rate.rate if recognized.

The Company recognizes interest accrued related to: (i) unrecognized tax benefits in Interest expense and (ii) tax refund claims in Other revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company recognizes penalties in Income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Penalties and interestInterest amounts recorded by the Company were insignificant for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. The Company recorded income tax expense of $38 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and income tax benefit of $1 million and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 related to penalties.

During 2013, Diamond Offshore received a notification from the Egyptian tax authorities proposing a $1.2 billion increase in taxable income for the years 2006 to 2008. Diamond Offshore disagrees with the tax audit findings and 2010.intends to pursue all legal remedies available. A charge to income tax expense of $57 million, inclusive of $31 million of penalties, was recorded due to the inherent uncertainties associated with Egyptian income tax law.

The following table summarizes deferred tax assets and liabilities:

 

December 31  2012   2011      2013   2012     

 

 
(In millions)                

Deferred tax assets:

        

Insurance reserves:

        

Property and casualty claim and claim adjustment expense reserves

  $352     $419         $        289    $        352       

Unearned premium reserves

   162      142          178     162       

Receivables

   62      75          53     62       

Employee benefits

   524      449          319     524       

Life settlement contracts

   45      61          46     45       

Deferred retroactive reinsurance benefit

   66    

Net loss and tax credits carried forward

   178      135          81     178       

Basis differential in investment in subsidiary

   26      29          23     26       

Goodwill

   221     33       

Other

   205      227          186     172       

 

 

Deferred tax assets

   1,554      1,537          1,462     1,554       

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

        

Deferred acquisition costs

   (238)     (241)         (232   (238)      

Net unrealized gains

   (733)     (521)         (359   (733)      

Property, plant and equipment

   (691)     (790)         (786   (691)      

Basis differential in investment in subsidiary

   (565)     (490)         (564   (565)      

Other liabilities

   (167)     (117)         (198   (167)      

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities

   (2,394)     (2,159)         (2,139   (2,394)      

 

 

Net deferred tax liability

  $        (840)    $        (622)      

Net deferred tax liability (a)

  $(677  $(840)      

 

 

(a)

Includes $39 million of deferred tax assets reflected in Other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2013.

As of December 31, 2012,2013, the Company has federal loss carryforwards with a tax effect of approximately $40 million which expire in 2014 and 2032 and federal tax credit carryforwards of $100$42 million, of which $95 million expire between 2019have an indefinite life and 2022. Diamond Offshore has foreign operating loss carryforwards with a tax effect of approximately $24$18 million, of which $8$17 million have an indefinite life with the remaining benefits expiring between 20132021 and 2021.2023.

Although realization of deferred tax assets is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the recognized deferred tax assets will be realized through recoupment of ordinary and capital taxes paid in prior carryback years and through future earnings, reversal of existing temporary differences and available tax planning strategies.

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law on January 2, 2013. The act extends, through 2013, several expired or expiring temporary business provisions, commonly referred to as “extenders”, which are retroactively extended to the beginning of 2012. As required by GAAP, the effects of new legislation are recognized when signed into law. The Company expects to reduce the first quarter ofreduced 2013 tax expense by approximately $28 million as a result of recognizing the 2012 effect of the extenders.

Note 11.12.  Debt

 

December 31    2012   2011        2013   2012       

 

 
(In millions)                

Loews Corporation (Parent Company):

        

Senior:

        

5.3% notes due 2016 (effective interest rate of 5.4%) (authorized, $400)

  $400    $400         $400    $400         

2.6% notes due 2023 (effective interest rate of 2.8%) (authorized, $500)

   500    

6.0% notes due 2035 (effective interest rate of 6.2%) (authorized, $300)

   300     300          300     300         

4.1% notes due 2043 (effective interest rate of 4.3%) (authorized, $500)

   500    

CNA Financial:

        

Senior:

        

8.4% notes due 2012 (effective interest rate of 8.6%) (authorized, $100)

     70       

5.9% notes due 2014 (effective interest rate of 6.0%) (authorized, $549)

   549     549          549     549         

6.5% notes due 2016 (effective interest rate of 6.6%) (authorized, $350)

   350     350          350     350         

7.0% notes due 2018 (effective interest rate of 7.1%) (authorized, $150)

   150     150          150     150         

7.4% notes due 2019 (effective interest rate of 7.5%) (authorized, $350)

   350     350          350     350         

5.9% notes due 2020 (effective interest rate of 6.0%) (authorized, $500)

   500     500          500     500         

5.8% notes due 2021 (effective interest rate of 5.9%) (authorized, $400)

   400     400          400     400         

7.3% debentures due 2023 (effective interest rate of 7.3%) (authorized, $250)

   243     243          243     243         

Variable rate note due 2036 (effective interest rate of 3.7%)

   30    

Variable rate note due 2036 (effective interest rate of 3.5% and 3.7%)

   30     30         

Other senior debt (effective interest rates approximate 2.9%)

   13     13            13         

Diamond Offshore:

        

Senior:

        

5.2% notes due 2014 (effective interest rate of 5.2%) (authorized, $250)

   250     250          250     250         

4.9% notes due 2015 (effective interest rate of 5.0%) (authorized, $250)

   250     250          250     250         

5.9% notes due 2019 (effective interest rate of 6.0%) (authorized, $500)

   500     500          500     500         

3.5% notes due 2023 (effective interest rate of 3.6%) (authorized, $250)

   250    

5.7% notes due 2039 (effective interest rate of 5.8%) (authorized, $500)

   500     500          500     500         

4.9% notes due 2043 (effective interest rate of 5.0%) (authorized, $750)

   750    

Boardwalk Pipeline:

        

Senior:

        

Variable rate revolving credit facility due 2017 (effective interest rate of 1.3% and 0.5%)

   302     458       

8.0% subordinated loan due 2022

     100       

Variable rate term loan due 2016 (effective interest rate of 1.8%)

     200       

Variable rate term loan due 2017 (effective interest rate of 2.0%)

   225    

5.8% notes due 2012 (effective interest rate of 6.0%) (authorized, $225)

     225       

Variable rate revolving credit facility due 2017 (effective interest rate of 1.3%)

   175     302         

Variable rate term loan due 2017 (effective interest rate of 1.9% and 2.0%)

   225     225         

4.6% notes due 2015 (effective interest rate of 5.1%) (authorized, $250)

   250     250          250     250         

5.1% notes due 2015 (effective interest rate of 5.2%) (authorized, $275)

   275     275          275     275         

5.9% notes due 2016 (effective interest rate of 6.0%) (authorized, $250)

   250     250          250     250         

5.5% notes due 2017 (effective interest rate of 5.6%) (authorized, $300)

   300     300          300     300         

6.3% notes due 2017 (effective interest rate of 6.4%) (authorized, $275)

   275     275          275     275         

5.2% notes due 2018 (effective interest rate of 5.4%) (authorized, $185)

   185     185          185     185         

5.8% notes due 2019 (effective interest rate of 5.9%) (authorized, $350)

   350     350          350     350         

4.5% notes due 2021 (effective interest rate of 5.0%) (authorized, $440)

   440     440          440     440         

4.0% notes due 2022 (effective interest rate of 4.4%) (authorized, $300)

   300       300     300         

3.4% notes due 2023 (effective interest rate of 3.5%) (authorized, $300)

   300       300     300         

7.3% debentures due 2027 (effective interest rate of 8.1%) (authorized, $100)

   100     100          100     100         

Capital lease obligation

   10    

HighMount:

        

Senior:

        

Variable rate credit facility due 2016 (effective interest rate of 3.4%)

   710     700          500     710         

Capital lease obligation

   2    

Loews Hotels:

        

Senior debt, principally mortgages (effective interest rates approximate 3.9%)

   209     213          202     209         

Elimination of intercompany debt

     (100)      

 

 
   9,256     9,046          10,911     9,256         

Less unamortized discount

   46     45          65     46         

 

 

Debt

  $        9,210    $        9,001         $     10,846    $      9,210         

 

 

December 31, 2012  Principal   Unamortized
Discount
   Net   Short Term
Debt
   Long Term
Debt
 
December 31, 2013  Principal   Unamortized
Discount
   Net   Short Term
Debt
   Long Term 
Debt 
 

 

 
(In millions)                                        

Loews Corporation

  $700       $7        $693        $  693        $    1,700          $    22        $    1,678          $    1,678      

CNA Financial

   2,585     15         2,570       $13        2,557         2,572       12         2,560        $      549         2,011      

Diamond Offshore

   1,500     11         1,489       1,489         2,500       20         2,480     250         2,230      

Boardwalk Pipeline

   3,552     13         3,539       3,539         3,435       11         3,424       3,424      

HighMount

   710       710       710         502         502     21         481      

Loews Hotels

   209       209     6        203         202         202     20         182      

 

 

Total

  $   9,256       $        46        $     9,210       $      19         $    9,191        $  10,911          $    65        $  10,846        $      840            $  10,006      

 

 

At December 31, 2012,2013, the aggregate of long term debt maturing in each of the next five years is approximately as follows: $19 million in 2013, $820$840 million in 2014, $948 million in 2015, $1,712 million$1.5 billion in 2016, $1,104$977 million in 2017, $337 million in 2018 and $4,653 million$6.3 billion thereafter. Long term debt is generally redeemable in whole or in part at the greater of the principal amount or the net present value of scheduled payments discounted at the specified treasury rate plus a margin.

CNA FinancialCorporate and Other

In AprilMay of 2012, 2013, the Company completed a public offering of $500 million aggregate principal amount of 2.6% senior notes due May 15, 2023 and $500 million aggregate principal amount of 4.1% senior notes due May 15, 2043. The Company received net proceeds of $983 million, after deducting the underwriters’ discounts and commissions and offering expenses of $17 million, which will be amortized over the life of the notes. The proceeds for this offering will be used for general corporate purposes.

CNA entered intoFinancial

In 2013, CNA became a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (“FHLBC”). FHLBC membership provides participants with access to additional sources of liquidity through various programs and services. As a requirement of membership in the FHLBC, CNA acquired $16 million of FHLBC stock giving it access to approximately $330 million of additional liquidity. As of December 31, 2013, CNA has no outstanding borrowings from the FHLBC.

CNA has a $250 million revolving credit agreement. The credit agreement, which matures on April 19, 2016, bears interest at London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin and is intended to be used for general business purposes.margin. At CNA’s election the commitments under the unsecured credit facility may be increased from time to time up to an additional aggregate amount of $100 million, and two one-year extensions are available prior to first and second anniversary of the closing. As of December 31, 2012,2013, there were no borrowings under the credit facility and CNA was in compliance with all covenants.

Diamond Offshore

In SeptemberNovember of 2012,2013, Diamond Offshore entered intocompleted a public offering of $250 million aggregate principal amount of 3.5% senior notes due November 1, 2023 and $750 million aggregate principal amount of 4.9% senior notes due November 1, 2043. Diamond Offshore intends to use the net proceeds of $988 million from this offering for general corporate purposes, including the redemption, repurchase or retirement of $250 million principal amount of its 5.2% senior notes due September 1, 2014 and $250 million principal amount of its 4.9% senior notes due July 1, 2015.

Diamond Offshore has a $750 million revolving credit agreement for general business purposes.with a maturity date of September 28, 2018. The credit agreement which matures on September 28, 2017, bears interest at Diamond Offshore’s option on either an alternate base rate or Eurodollar rate, as defined in the credit agreement, plus an applicable margin. As of December 31, 2012,2013, there were no borrowings under the credit facility and Diamond Offshore was in compliance with all covenants.

Boardwalk Pipeline

In April of 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline entered intohas a Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement (“Amended Credit Agreement”)revolving credit agreement with aggregate lending commitments of $1.0 billion. The Amended Credit Agreementcredit agreement has a maturity date of April 27, 2017. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline had $175 million and $302 million of loansborrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility with a weighted-averageweighted average interest rate on the borrowings of 1.3% and had no letters of credit issued. As of December 31, 2012,2013, Boardwalk Pipeline was in compliance with all covenants under the credit facility and had available borrowing capacity of $698$825 million.

In June of 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline issued $300 million principal amount of 4.0% senior notes due June 15, 2022.HighMount

In August of 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline repaid at maturity the entire $225 million principal amount ofHighMount has a credit agreement governing its 5.8% senior notes. In September of 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline repaid in full its $200 million variable rate term loan due December 1, 2016.

In October of 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline entered intoand a $225$250 million variable rate term loan due October 1, 2017 to fund the acquisition of Louisiana Midstream.

In November of 2012, Boardwalk Pipeline issued $300 million principal amount of 3.4% senior notes due February 1, 2023. The proceeds were utilized to repay $100 million of borrowings under its subordinated loan agreement with BPHC and to reduce outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility. The credit agreement, which matures on December 1, 2016, bears interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin. As of December 31, 2013, there were no borrowings under the revolving credit facility. HighMount’s credit agreement contains financial covenants typical for these agreements, including a maximum debt to capitalization ratio and a minimum ratio of the net present value of its projected future cash flows from its proved natural gas and oil reserves to total debt. Due to the decline in proved natural gas and oil reserves and the resulting limited capacity under the credit agreement, HighMount repaid $210 million of its debt in 2013. As of December 31, 2013, HighMount was in compliance with all covenants.

Note 12.13.  Shareholders’ Equity

Accumulated other comprehensive income

The components oftables below display the changes in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(“AOCI”) by component for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013:

   OTTI  
Gains  
(Losses)
   Unrealized   
Gains (Losses)
on Investments
   Cash Flow
Hedges   
   Pension 
Liability
   Foreign
Currency
Translation
  Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 

 

 

(In millions)

           

Balance, January 1, 2011

  $(65)      $607         $(18)     $ (415)    $121       $230       

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, after tax of $23, $(211), $(13), $126 and $0

   (44)     377        20      (241)     (14  98       

Reclassification of (gains) losses from accumulated other comprehensive income, after tax of $(29), $8, $(10), $0 and $0

   54      (15)       19            61       

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   10      362        39      (238)     (14  159       

Acquisition of CNA Surety noncontrolling interests and disposition of FICOH ownership interest

     2                10       

Issuance of equity securities by subsidiary

               1       

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (2)     (42)            23      1    (16)      

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

   (57)     929        25      (621)     108    384       

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, after tax of $(54), $(151), $(17), $76 and $0

   102      281        26      (145)     39    303       

Reclassification of (gains) losses from accumulated other comprehensive income, after tax of $10, $(31), $20, $(8) and $0

   (18)     58        (34)     13       19       

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   84      339        (8)     (132)     39    322       

Issuance of equity securities by subsidiary

               5       

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (9)     (35)       (1)     16      (4  (33)      

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

   18      1,233        16      (732)     143    678       

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, after tax of $(3), $354, $7, $(165) and $0

        (658)       (12)     307      (11  (368)      

Reclassification of (gains) losses from accumulated other comprehensive income, after tax of $0, $10, $8, $(12) and $0

     (21)       (11)     22       (10)      

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

        (679)       (23)     329      (11  (378)      

Issuance of equity securities by subsidiary

               2       

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (1)     68          (31)     1    37       

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

  $    23       $        622         $(7)     $ (432)    $    133       $      339       

 

 

Amounts reclassified from AOCI shown above are reported in Net income as follows:

 

   Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
on Investments
   OTTI
Gains/
(Losses)
   Cash Flow
Hedges
   Foreign
Currency
Translation
   Pension
Liability
   Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 

 

 
(In millions)                        

Balance, January 1, 2010

    $173         $(144)      $(81)        $77         $(444)      $(419)    

Unrealized holding gains on investments, after tax of $(319), $(32) and $(30)

   585        59      54            698     

Adjustments for items included in Net income, after tax of $48, $(15) and $(4)

   (89)       27      7            (55)    

Foreign currency translation adjustment

         49          49     

Pension liability adjustment, after tax of $(15)

           29      29     

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (62)       (7)     2        (5)         (72)    

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2010

   607        (65)     (18)       121        (415)     230     

Acquisition of CNA Surety noncontrolling interests and disposition of FICOH ownership interest

   2                   10     

Unrealized holding gains on investments, after tax of $(211), $23 and $(13)

   377        (44)     20            353     

Adjustments for items included in Net income, after tax of $8, $(29) and $(10)

   (15)       54      19   ��        58     

Foreign currency translation adjustment

         (14)         (14)    

Pension liability adjustment, after tax of $126

           (238)     (238)    

Issuance of equity securities by subsidiary

                1     

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (42)       (2)     4        1        23      (16)    

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

   929        (57)     25        108        (621)     384     

Unrealized holding gains on investments, after tax of $(151), $(54) and $(17)

   281        102      26            409     

Adjustments for items included in Net income, after tax of $(31), $10 and $20

   58        (18)     (34)           6     

Foreign currency translation adjustment

         39          39     

Pension liability adjustment, after tax of $68

           (132)     (132)    

Issuance of equity securities by subsidiary

                5     

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (35)       (9)     (1)       (4)       16      (33)    

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

    $    1,233         $      18       $      16         $    143         $  (732)      $678     

 

 
Major Category of AOCIAffected Line Item

OTTI gains (losses)Investment gains (losses)
Unrealized gains (losses) on investmentsInvestment gains (losses)
Cash flow hedgesInterest expense, Other revenues and Contract drilling expenses
Pension liabilityOther operating expenses

Common Stock Dividends

Dividends of $0.25 per share on the Company’s common stock were declared and paid in 2013, 2012 and 2011.

There are no restrictions on the Company’s retained earnings or net income with regard to payment of dividends. However, as a holding company, Loews relies upon invested cash balances and distributions from its subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to declare and pay any dividends to holders of its common stock. The ability of the Company’s subsidiaries to pay dividends is subject to, among other things, the availability of sufficient earnings and funds in such subsidiaries, compliance with covenants in their respective loan agreements and applicable state laws, including in the case of the insurance subsidiaries of CNA, laws and rules governing the payment of dividends by regulated insurance companies. See Note 14 for a discussion of the regulatory restrictions on CNA’s availability to pay dividends.

Subsidiary Equity Transactions

In February, August and OctoberMay of 2012,2013, Boardwalk Pipeline sold 9.2 million, 11.6 million and 11.212.7 million common units in a public offeringsoffering and received net proceeds of $250 million, $318 million and $298$377 million, including $5an $8 million $7 million and $6 million contributionscontribution from usthe Company to maintain ourits 2% general partner interest. The Company’s percentage ownership interest in Boardwalk Pipeline declined as a result of these transactions,this transaction, from 64%55% to 55%53%. The issuance price of the common units exceeded the Company’s carrying value, resulting in an increase to APICAdditional paid-in capital (“APIC”) of $115$51 million and an increase to AOCI of $5$2 million.

Treasury Share RepurchasesStock

The Company repurchased 4.9 million, 5.6 million 18.2 million and 11.018.2 million shares of Loews common stock at aggregate costs of $218 million, $222 million $718 million and $405$718 million during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. Upon retirement, treasury stock is eliminated through a reduction to common stock, APIC and retained earnings.

Note 13.14.  Statutory Accounting Practices

CNA’s insurance subsidiaries are domiciled in various jurisdictions. These subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the respective jurisdictions’ insurance regulators. Domestic prescribed statutory accounting practices are set forth in a variety of publications of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) as well as state laws, regulations and general administrative rules. These statutory accounting principles vary in certain respects from GAAP. In converting from statutory accounting principles to GAAP, the more significant adjustments include deferral of policy acquisition costs and the inclusion of net unrealized holding gains or losses in shareholders’ equity relating to certain fixed maturity securities.

CNA’s ability to pay dividends and other credit obligations is significantly dependent on receipt of dividends from CCC as it directly or indirectly owns all significant subsidiaries. The payment of dividends by CNA’s insurance subsidiaries without prior approval of the insurance department of each subsidiary’s domiciliary jurisdiction is generally limited by formula. Dividends in excess of these amounts are subject to prior approval by the respective insurance regulator.

Dividends from CCC are subject to the insurance holding company laws of the State of Illinois, the domiciliary state of CCC. Under these laws, ordinary dividends, or dividends that do not require prior approval by the Department, may be paid only from earned surplus, which is calculated by removing unrealized gains from unassigned surplus. As of December 31, 2012,2013, CCC is in a positive earned surplus position, enabling CCC to pay approximately $550$715 million of dividend payments during 20132014 that would not be subject to the Department’s prior

approval. The actual level of dividends paid in any year is determined after an assessment of available dividend capacity, holding company liquidity and cash needs as well as the impact the dividends will have on the statutory surplus of the applicable insurance company.

Combined statutory capital and surplus and net income (loss), determined in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance and/or other regulatory authorities for the Combined Continental Casualty Companies and the life company, were as follows:

   Statutory Capital and Surplus          Statutory Net Income (Loss) 
 

 

 
  December 31        Year Ended December 31 
 

 

 
  2013 (b) 2012        2013 (b)   2012   2011   

 

 
(In millions)                

Combined Continental Casualty Companies (a)

   $  11,137       $    9,998               $    913       $    391            $    954      

Life company

 597       556               48       44            29      

(a)

Represents the combined statutory surplus of CCC and its subsidiaries, including the life company.

(b)

Information derived from the statutory-basis financial statements to be filed with insurance regulators.

CNA’s domestic insurance subsidiaries are subject to risk-based capital (“RBC”) requirements. Risk-based capitalRBC is a method developed by the NAIC to determine the minimum amount of statutory capital appropriate for an insurance company to support its overall business operations in consideration of its size and risk profile. The formula for determining the amount of risk-based capitalRBC specifies various factors, weighted based on the perceived degree of risk, which are applied to certain financial balances and financial activity. The adequacy of a company’s actual capital is evaluated by a comparison to the risk-based capitalRBC results, as determined by the formula. Companies below minimum risk-based capitalRBC requirements are classified within certain levels, each of which requires specified corrective action. As

The statutory capital and surplus presented above for CCC was approximately 265% and 240% of company action level RBC at December 31, 20122013 and 2011, all2012. Company action level RBC is the level of CNA’s domesticRBC which triggers a heightened level of regulatory supervision. The statutory capital and surplus of CCC’s foreign insurance subsidiaries, exceededwhich is not significant to the minimum risk-basedoverall statutory capital requirements.

Subsidiaries with insurance operations outside the United States areand surplus, also subject to insurance regulation in the countries in which they operate. CNA has legal entity and branch operations in other countries, primarily the United Kingdom, Canada and Bermuda. CNA’s foreign legal entities and branch met or exceeded their respective regulatory and other capital requirements.

Combined statutory capital and surplus and net income (loss), determined in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance and/or other regulatory authorities for the Combined Continental Casualty Companies and the life company, were as follows:

   Statutory Capital and Surplus   Statutory Net Income (Loss) 
  

 

 

 
   December 31   Year Ended December 31 
  

 

 

 
     2012 (b)    2011   2012 (b)   2011   2010     

 

 
(In millions)                    

Combined Continental Casualty Companies (a)

   $    9,998      $    9,888           $      391      $    954         $    258       

Life company

   556      519           44      29         86       

(a)

Represents the combined statutory surplus of CCC and its subsidiaries, including the life company.

(b)

Information derived from the statutory-basis financial statements to be filed with insurance regulators.

The Hardy insurance entities are not owned by CCC, therefore their regulatory capital is not included in the Statutory Capital and Surplus of the Combined Continental Casualty Companies presented in the table above. At December 31, 2012,2013, Hardy’s capital requirement was approximately $330 million, which included $66$148 million of capital provided by CCC andwhich is included in Combined Continental Casualty Companies’ Statutory Capital and Surplus above.

Note 14.15.  Supplemental Natural Gas and Oil Information (Unaudited)

Users of this information should be aware that the process of estimating quantities of proved natural gas, NGLs and crude oil reserves is very complex, requiring significant subjective decisions in the evaluation of all available geological, engineering and economic data for each reservoir. The data for a given reservoir may also change substantially over time as a result of numerous factors including, but not limited to, additional development activity, evolving production history and continual reassessment of the viability of production under varying economic conditions. As a result, revisions to existing reserve estimates may occur from time to time. Although every reasonable effort is made to ensure reserve estimates reported represent the most accurate assessments possible, the subjective decisions and variances in available data for various reservoirs make these estimates generally less precise than other estimates included in the financial statement disclosures.

Proved reserves represent quantities of natural gas, NGLs and oil which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in the future from known reservoirs under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations. Proved developed reserves are proved reserves which can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment, infrastructure and operating methods.

Estimates of reserves as of December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 are based upon studies for each of HighMount’s properties prepared by HighMount staff engineers. Calculations were prepared using standard geological and engineering methods generally accepted by the petroleum industry and in accordance with SEC guidelines. HighMount’s reserve estimates for 20122013 were audited by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., (“NSAI”). NSAI is an independent third party petroleum engineering consulting firm, and the audit was performed in accordance with the “Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information” promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers. All proved reserves are located in the United States of America.

States.

Reserves

Estimated net quantities of proved natural gas and oil (including condensate and NGLs) reserves at December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 and changes in the reserves during 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011 are shown in the schedule below:

 

Proved Developed and Undeveloped Reserves  Natural  
Gas
   NGLs and
Oil
   Natural Gas    
Equivalents    
   Natural  
Gas  
   NGLs and
Oil
   Natural Gas    
Equivalents    
 

 

 
  (Bcf)   (thousands   (Bcfe)       (Bcf)     (thousands
of barrels)
   (Bcfe)     
      of barrels)     

January 1, 2010

   1,521      73,838      1,964         

Changes in reserves:

      

Extensions, discoveries and other additions (a)

   251      13,370      331         

Revisions of previous estimates (b)

   (407)     (24,518)     (554)        

Production

   (57)     (3,263)     (77)        

Sales of reserves in place

   (363)     (232)     (364)        

Purchases of reserves in place

      

 

December 31, 2010

   945      59,195      1,300         

January 1, 2011

   945      59,195       1,300        

Changes in reserves:

            

Extensions, discoveries and other additions

   26      3,556      48            26      3,556       48        

Revisions of previous estimates (c)

   (107)     (7,540)     (152)        

Revisions of previous estimates (a)

   (107)     (7,540)      (152)       

Production

   (45)     (2,976)     (63)           (45)     (2,976)      (63)       

Sales of reserves in place

     (11)         (11)     

Purchases of reserves in place

     167      1              167       1        

 

 

December 31, 2011

   819      52,391      1,134            819      52,391       1,134        

Changes in reserves:

            

Extensions, discoveries and other additions (d)

   22      8,960      75         

Revisions of previous estimates (e)

   (244)     (13,902)     (328)        

Extensions, discoveries and other additions (b)

   22      8,960       75        

Revisions of previous estimates (c)

   (244)     (13,902)      (328)       

Production

   (39)     (2,858)     (56)           (39)     (2,858)      (56)       

Sales of reserves in place

            

Purchases of reserves in place

            

 

 

December 31, 2012

   558      44,591      825            558      44,591       825        

Changes in reserves:

      

Extensions, discoveries and other additions

     765       6        

Revisions of previous estimates (d)

   (11)     (8,643)      (63)       

Production

   (33)     (2,566)      (48)       

Sales of reserves in place

     (15)      (1)       

Purchases of reserves in place

      

 

December 31, 2013

   514      34,132       719        

 

 

Proved developed reserves at:

            

December 31, 2010

   741      45,804      1,016         

December 31, 2011

   623      37,951      851            623      37,951       851        

December 31, 2012

   491      33,781      694            491      33,781       694        

December 31, 2013

   485      30,333       667        

(a)

HighMount added 238 Bcfe of proved undeveloped reserves from non-proved categories in 2010. These additions pertain to locations HighMount expects to drill during the next five years. Additionally, HighMount added 42 Bcfe primarily through drilling and the remaining 51 Bcfe in additions were associated with the Alabama and Michigan properties prior to sale.

(b)

During 2010, HighMount reclassified 208 Bcfe of proved undeveloped reserves to a non-proved category due to certain wells reaching their five year maturity as a result of reduced drilling activity in 2009 and 2010. Additionally, HighMount reduced its proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves by 346 Bcfe as a result of higher production declines on its producing wells than previously anticipated.

(c)

During 2011, HighMount reduced its proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves by 152 Bcfe as a result of recent higher decline rates of producing wells and economic factors such as lower gas prices and higher operating expenses.

(d)(b)

During 2012, HighMount converted 27 Bcfe from probable reserves to proved developed and converted another 48 Bcfe from probable reserves to proved undeveloped as a result of new drilling activity.

(e)(c)

During 2012, HighMount reclassified 199 Bcfe of proved undeveloped reserves to a non-proved category as a result of economic factors such as lower gas prices and higher operating expenses. Lower gas prices also resulted in thean 80 Bcfe reduction in proved developed reserves due to wells reaching their economic limit sooner than previously anticipated. Additionally, HighMount reduced its proved developed reserves by 49 Bcfe as a result of higher production declines on its producing wells, partly due to the suspension of uneconomic maintenance and recompletion work.

(d)

During 2013, HighMount reclassified 79 Bcfe of proved undeveloped reserves to a non-proved category due to variability in well performance and reduction in drilling plans as a result of continued low natural gas and NGL prices. Additionally, HighMount reduced its proved developed reserves by 73 Bcfe primarily as a result of higher production declines on its gas-producing wells, partly due to the suspension of uneconomic maintenance and recompletion work. Higher gas prices resulted in an 89 Bcfe increase in proved developed reserves due to wells reaching their economic limit later than previously anticipated.

Capitalized Costs

The aggregate amounts of costs capitalized for natural gas and oil producing activities, and related aggregate amounts of accumulated depletion follow:

 

December 31        2012               2011               2010           2013     2012 2011       

 

 

(In millions)

                

Subject to depletion

  $3,497    $3,002    $2,818        $        3,641    $    3,497   $    3,002        

Costs excluded from depletion

   209     384     272         259     209    384        

 

 

Gross natural gas, NGL and oil properties

   3,706     3,386     3,090         3,900     3,706    3,386        

Less accumulated depletion

   2,813     2,056     1,991         3,128     2,813    2,056        

 

 

Net natural gas, NGL and oil properties

  $893    $1,330    $1,099        $772    $893   $1,330        

 

 

The following costs were incurred in natural gas and oil producing activities:

 

Year Ended December 31        2012               2011               2010           2013     2012 2011   

 

 

(In millions)

                

Acquisition of properties:

           

Proved

    $12         $12        

Unproved

  $16     128    $29        $18    $16    128        

 

 

Subtotal

   16     140     29         18     16    140        

Exploration costs

   6     11     5         16     6    11        

Development costs (a)

   308     159     143         222     308    159        

 

 

Total

  $330    $310    $177        $        256    $        330   $        310        

 

 

 

(a)

Development costs incurred for proved undeveloped reserves were $17, $14 and $25 in 2013, 2012 and $23 in 2012, 2011 and 2010.2011.

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Natural Gas and Oil Reserves

The following table represents a calculation of the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved natural gas and oil reserve quantities that HighMount owns:

 

December 31          2012                 2011                 2010         

 

 

(In millions)

      

Future cash inflows (a) (b)

  $3,405    $5,688    $6,044      

Less:

      

Future production costs

   1,446     1,969     2,073      

Future development costs

   359     636     580      

Future income tax expense

   6     456     571      

 

 

Future cash flows

   1,594     2,627     2,820      

Less annual discount (10% a year)

   948     1,725     1,863      

 

 

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  $646    $902    $957      

 

 

(a)

2012, 2011 and 2010 amounts exclude the effect of derivative instruments designated as hedges of future sales of production at year end.

(b)

The following prices were used in the determination of standardized measure:

December 31          2012                 2011                 2010         

 

 

Gas (per million British thermal units)

  $2.76    $4.12    $4.38      

NGL (per barrel)

   41.11     55.18     43.75      

Oil (per barrel)

   94.71     96.19     79.43      

December 31  2013   2012   2011

 

(In millions)           

Future cash inflows (a) (b)

  $      2,819            $      3,405            $      5,688      

Less:

      

Future production costs

   1,392         1,446        1,969      

Future development costs

   131         359        636      

Future income tax expense

     6        456      

 

Future cash flows

   1,296         1,594        2,627      

Less annual discount (10% a year)

   813         948        1,725      

 

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

  $483            $646        $         902      

 

 

(a)    2013, 2012 and 2011 amounts exclude the effect of derivative instruments designated as hedges of future sales of production at year end.

(b)    The following prices were used in the determination of standardized measure:

December 31  2013   2012   2011      

 

Gas (per million British thermal units)

  $3.67            $2.76        $        4.12      

NGL (per barrel)

   35.39         41.11              55.18      

Oil (per barrel)

         96.94               94.71        96.19      

In the foregoing determination of future cash inflows, sales prices for natural gas and oil represent average prices determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month, changed for contractual arrangements with customers. Future costs of developing and producing the proved natural gas and oil reserves reported at the end of each year shown were based on costs determined at each such year end, assuming the continuation of existing economic conditions. Future income taxes were computed by applying the appropriate year end or future statutory tax rate to future pretax net cash flows, less the tax basis of the properties involved, and giving effect to tax deductions, permanent differences and tax credits.

It is not intended that the FASB’s standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows represent the fair market value of HighMount’s proved reserves. HighMount cautions that the disclosures shown are based on estimates of proved reserve quantities and future production schedules which are inherently imprecise and subject to revision and the 10% discount rate. In addition, costs and prices as of the measurement date are used in the determinations, and no value was assigned to probable or possible reserves.

Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Natural Gas and Oil Reserves

The following table is a summary of changes between the total standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows at the beginning and end of each year:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012        2011        2010                2013            2012            2011         

 

(In millions)

                 

Standardized measure, beginning of period

  $        902     $        957     $      1,098         $646     $902     $      957     

Changes in the year resulting from:

            

Sales and transfers of natural gas and oil produced during the year, less production costs

   (213)     (291)     (345)             (169)         (213)    (291)    

Net changes in prices and development costs

   (644)     164      890          103      (644)    164     

Extensions, discoveries and other additions, less production and development costs

   183      82      67          50      183     82     

Previously estimated development costs incurred during the period

   14      25      23          17      14     25     

Revisions of previous quantity estimates

   181      (173)     (346)         (163)     181     (173)    

Net changes in purchases and sales of proved reserves in place

          (446)         (32)      3     

Accretion of discount

   100      107      114          61      100     107     

Income taxes

   131      20      (77)         (37)     131     20     

Net changes in production rates and other

   (8)          (21)              (8)    8     

 

Standardized measure, end of period

  $646     $902     $957         $483     $646     $      902     

 

Note 15.16.  Benefit Plans

Pension Plans – The Company has several non-contributory defined benefit plans for eligible employees. Benefits for certain plans are determined annually based on a specified percentage of annual earnings (based on the participant’s age or years of service) and a specified interest rate (which is established annually for all participants) applied to accrued balances. The benefits for another plan which covers salaried employees are based on formulas which include, among others, years of service and average pay. The Company’s funding policy is to make contributions in accordance with applicable governmental regulatory requirements.

Other Postretirement Benefit Plans – The Company has several postretirement benefit plans covering eligible employees and retirees. Participants generally become eligible after reaching age 55 with required years of service. Actual requirements for coverage vary by plan. Benefits for retirees who were covered by bargaining units vary by each unit and contract. Benefits for certain retirees are in the form of a Company health care account.

Benefits for retirees reaching age 65 are generally integrated with Medicare. Other retirees, based on plan provisions, must use Medicare as their primary coverage, with the Company reimbursing a portion of the unpaid amount; or are reimbursed for the Medicare Part B premium or have no Company coverage. The benefits provided by the Company are basically health and, for certain retirees, life insurance type benefits.

The Company funds certain of these benefit plans, and accrues postretirement benefits during the active service of those employees who would become eligible for such benefits when they retire. The Company uses December 31 as the measurement date for its plans.

Weighted-average

Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:

 

  Pension Benefits   Other Postretirement Benefits        Pension Benefits   Other Postretirement Benefits       
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
December 31  2012   2011   2010   2012   2011     2010     2013   2012   2011   2013   2012   2011       

 

 

Discount rate

   3.6%     4.5%     5.3%     3.5%     4.3%     5.0%     4.4%     3.6%     4.5%               4.2%               3.5%     4.3%   

Expected long term rate of return on plan assets

   7.5% to 7.8%     7.5% to 8.0%     7.5% to 8.0%     5.3%     5.3%     4.6%     7.5%     7.5% to 7.8%     7.5% to 8.0%     5.3%     5.3%     5.3%   

Rate of compensation increase

   3.5% to 5.5%     4.0% to 5.5%     4.0% to 5.5%               3.5% to 5.5%     3.5% to 5.5%     4.0% to 5.5%        

Weighted-averageWeighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:

 

  Pension Benefits   Other Postretirement Benefits        Pension Benefits   Other Postretirement Benefits       
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
Year Ended December 31  2012   2011   2010   2012   2011     2010     2013   2012   2011   2013   2012   2011       

 

 

Discount rate

   4.5%     5.3%     5.7%     4.4%     5.0%     5.6%     3.9%     4.5%     5.3%               3.5%               4.4%     5.0%   

Expected long term rate of return on plan assets

   7.5% to 8.0%     7.5% to 8.0%     7.5% to 8.0%     5.3%     4.6%     5.4%     7.5% to 7.8%     7.5% to 8.0%     7.5% to 8.0%     5.3%     5.3%     4.6%   

Rate of compensation increase

   4.0% to 5.5%     4.0% to 5.5%     4.0% to 5.5%               3.5% to 5.5%     4.0% to 5.5%     4.0% to 5.5%        

The expected long term rate of return for plan assets is determined based on widely-accepted capital market principles, long term return analysis for global fixed income and equity markets as well as the active total return oriented portfolio management style. Long term trends are evaluated relative to market factors such as inflation, interest rates and fiscal and monetary policies, in order to assess the capital market assumptions as applied to the plan. Consideration of diversification needs and rebalancing is maintained.

Assumed health care cost trend rates:

 

December 31  2012   2011   2010   2013   2012   2011 

 

 

Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year

   4.0% to 8.5%     4.0% to 8.5%     4.0% to 9.0%     4.0% to 8.5%     4.0% to 8.5%     4.0% to 8.5%   

Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)

   4.0% to 5.0%     4.0% to 5.0%     4.0% to 5.0%     4.0% to 5.0%     4.0% to 5.0%     4.0% to 5.0%   

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

   2013-2021     2012-2020     2011-2020     2014-2022     2013-2021     2012-2020   

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. An increase or decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rate of 1% in each year would not have a significant impact on the Company’s service and interest cost as of December 31, 2012.2013. An increase of 1% in each year would increase the Company’s accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 20122013 by $4$2 million and a decrease of 1% in each year would decrease the Company’s accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 20122013 by $6$4 million.

Net periodic benefit cost components:

 

  Pension Benefits   Other Postretirement Benefits         Pension Benefits   Other Postretirement Benefits       
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
Year Ended December 31          2012     2011   2010       2012   2011   2010                 2013       2012   2011   2013   2012   2011       

 

 

(In millions)

                                    

Service cost

   $      24      $      24      $     26          $       1      $       2      $       2             $22     $24     $24     $    $    $2       

Interest cost

   151      164      168                    11          136      151      164                6       

Expected return on plan assets

   (188)     (188)     (176)         (4)     (3)     (4)         (198)       (188)       (188)     (5)     (4)     (3)      

Amortization of unrecognized net gain

   47      29      28                 2       

Amortization of unrecognized net loss

   54      47      29             1       

Amortization of unrecognized prior service benefit

         (25)     (27)     (24)                 (25)     (25)     (27)      

Regulatory asset decrease

                5                    4       

Settlement/Curtailment

               

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

   $      34      $      29      $     46          $    (23)       $    (17)       $      (8)            $19     $34     $29     $    (24)    $    (23)    $    (17)      

 

 

The following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations and plan assets:

 

  Pension Benefits   Other Postretirement Benefits               Pension Benefits                   Other Postretirement Benefits 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
          2012     2011   2012         2011           2013   2012             2013     2012 

 

 

(In millions)

                      

Change in benefit obligation:

               

Benefit obligation at January 1

      $    3,393     $     3,146     $    118     $    159             $3,700         $3,393         $122         $118       

Service cost

   24      24           2          22      24      1    1       

Interest cost

   151      164           6          136      151      4    5       

Plan participants’ contributions

            7              6    6       

Amendments

         (11)      

Amendments/Curtailments

   (13)       (2 

Actuarial (gain) loss

   303      295           (15)         (313)     303      (13  8       

Benefits paid from plan assets

   (190)     (182)     (16)     (17)         (178)     (190)     (17  (16)      

Settlements

   (19)       

Foreign exchange

   19                 19      

Reduction of benefit obligations due to disposition of subsidiary

     (54)       (13)      

 

 

Benefit obligation at December 31

   3,700      3,393      122      118          3,336      3,700      101    122       

 

 

Change in plan assets:

               

Fair value of plan assets at January 1

   2,435      2,468      82      73          2,672      2,435      87    82       

Actual return on plan assets

   269      90           11          340      269      (2  8       

Company contributions

   141      113           8          98      141      7    7       

Plan participants’ contributions

            7              6    6       

Benefits paid from plan assets

   (190)     (182)     (16)     (17)         (178)     (190)     (17  (16)      

Settlements

   (19)       

Foreign exchange

   17                 17      

Reduction of plan assets due to disposition of subsidiary

     (54)      

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at December 31

   2,672      2,435      87      82          2,914      2,672      81    87       

 

 

Funded status

      $    (1,028)    $(958)    $(35)    $(36)            $(422)        $(1,028)        $(20       $(35)      

 

 

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:

       

Other assets

      $          $31         $27       

Other liabilities

   (431)        $(1,028)     (51  (62)      

 

Net amount recognized

      $(422)        $(1,028)        $(20       $(35)      

 

Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), not yet recognized in net periodic (benefit) cost:

       

Prior service cost (credit)

      $(6)        $        $(117       $(140)      

Net actuarial loss

   831      1,348      18    24       

 

Net amount recognized

      $825         $1,351         $(99       $(116)      

 

Information for plans with projected and accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:

       

Projected benefit obligation

      $3,229         $3,700      

Accumulated benefit obligation

   3,160      3,509         $51         $62       

Fair value of plan assets

   2,914      2,672      

   Pension Benefits   Other Postretirement Benefits 
  

 

 

 
   2012   2011    2012   2011 

 

 
(In millions)                

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:

        

Other assets

      $27     $28       

Other liabilities

  $      (1,028)    $      (958)     (62)     (64)      

 

 

Net amount recognized

  $(1,028)    $(958)    $(35)    $(36)      

 

 

Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), not yet recognized in net periodic (benefit) cost:

        

Prior service cost (credit)

  $    $    $(140)    $(166)      

Net actuarial loss

   1,348      1,174      24      20       

 

 

Net amount recognized

  $1,351     $1,177     $(116)    $(146)      

 

 

Information for plans with projected and accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:

        

Projected benefit obligation

  $3,700     $3,328       

Accumulated benefit obligation

   3,509      3,218     $62     $64       

Fair value of plan assets

   2,672      2,370       

The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $3.6$3.3 billion and $3.3$3.6 billion at December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012.

The Company employs a total return approach whereby a mix of equity and fixed maturity securities are used to maximize the long term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk and to manage cash flows according to plan requirements. The intent of this strategy is to minimize plan expenses by outperforming plan liabilities over the long run. Risk tolerance is established after careful consideration of the plan liabilities, plan funded status and corporate financial conditions. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of fixed maturity, equity and short term securities. Alternative investments, including limited partnerships, are used to enhance risk adjusted long term returns while improving portfolio diversification. At December 31, 2012,2013, the Company had committed $44$108 million to future capital calls from various third party limited partnership investments in exchange for an ownership interest in the related partnerships. Investment risk is monitored through annual liability measurements, periodic asset/liability studies and quarterly investment portfolio reviews.

The table below presents the estimated amounts to be recognized from Accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic cost (benefit) during 2013.2014.

 

   

Pension

Benefits

  

Other
      Postretirement      

Benefits

 

(In millions)

    

Amortization of net actuarial loss

  $   56    

Amortization of prior service credit

    $       (24)

 

Total estimated amounts to be recognized

  $   56    $       (24)

 

     Pension
Benefits
  Other        
Postretirement        
Benefits        

 

(In millions)        

Amortization of net actuarial loss

    $      30       $        1                 

Amortization of prior service credit

    (1)      (26)                

 

Total estimated amounts to be recognized

    $      29       $    (25)                

 

The table below presents the estimated future minimum benefit payments at December 31, 2012.2013.

 

Expected future benefit payments  Pension
Benefits
   Other     
Postretirement     
Benefits     
     Pension
Benefits
  Other        
Postretirement        
Benefits        

 

(In millions)                

2013

  $220        $10            

2014

   218     10                $        221      $          9              

2015

   222     10                218      9              

2016

   227     9                225      9              

2017

   233     9                231      9              

2018

    235      8              

Thereafter

   1,201     39                1,181      35              

 

  $     2,321        $87                $    2,311      $        79              

 

In 2013,2014, it is expected that contributions of approximately $93$59 million will be made to pension plans and $7$5 million to postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans.

Pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.

 

December 31, 2012  Level 1     Level 2   Level 3    Total    

 

 
(In millions)                

Fixed maturity securities:

        

Corporate and other bonds

    $436     $11    $447      

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

     91        91      

Asset-backed

     269��       269      

 

 

Total fixed maturity securities

  $-     796      11     807      

Equity securities

   424     102      5     531      

Short term investments

   41     82        123      

Fixed income mutual funds

   110         110      

Limited partnerships:

        

Hedge funds

     591      391     982      

Private equity

       69     69      

 

 

Total limited partnerships

   -     591      460     1,051      

Other assets

     40        40      

Investment contracts with insurance company

       10     10      

 

 

Total

  $    575    $    1,611     $    486    $    2,672      

 

 
December 31, 2011                

 

 

Fixed maturity securities:

        

Corporate and other bonds

    $377     $10    $387      

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

     104        104      

Asset-backed

     276        276      

 

 

Total fixed maturity securities

  $-     757      10     767      

Equity securities

   386     75      5     466      

Short term investments

   77     35        112      

Fixed income mutual funds

   98         98      

Limited partnerships:

        

Hedge funds

     533      355     888      

Private equity

       73     73      

 

 

Total limited partnerships

   -     533      428     961      

Other assets

     21        21      

Investment contracts with insurance company

       10     10      

 

 

Total

  $561    $1,421     $453    $2,435      

 

 

December 31, 2013      Level 1         Level 2       Level 3     Total       

 

 
(In millions)                

Fixed maturity securities:

        

Corporate and other bonds

    $505      $15    $520       

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

     73         73       

Asset-backed

     254         254       

 

 

Total fixed maturities

  $-     832       15     847       

Equity securities

   527     117       8     652       

Short term investments

   49     49         98       

Fixed income mutual funds

   100         100       

Limited partnerships:

        

Hedge funds

     705       352     1,057       

Private equity

       125     125       

 

 

Total limited partnerships

   -     705       477     1,182       

Other assets

     35         35       

 

 

Total

  $676    $1,738      $500    $2,914       

 

 
December 31, 2012                

 

 

Fixed maturity securities:

        

Corporate and other bonds

    $436      $11    $447       

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

     91         91       

Asset-backed

     269         269       

 

 

Total fixed maturities

  $-     796       11     807       

Equity securities

   424     102       5     531       

Short term investments

   41     82         123       

Fixed income mutual funds

   110         110       

Limited partnerships:

        

Hedge funds

     591       391     982       

Private equity

       69     69       

 

 

Total limited partnerships

   -     591       460     1,051       

Other assets

     40         40       

Investment contracts with insurance company

       10     10       

 

 

Total

  $575    $1,611      $486    $    2,672       

 

 

The limited partnership investments are recorded at fair value, which represents the plans’ share of the net asset value of each partnership. The share of the net asset value of each partnership is determined by the General Partner and is based upon the fair value of the underlying investments, which are valued using varying market approaches. Level 2 includes limited partnership investments which can be redeemed at net asset value in 90 days or less. Level 3 includes limited partnership investments with withdrawal provisions greater than 90 days, or for which withdrawals are not permitted until the termination of the partnership. Within hedge fund strategies, approximately 54%58% are equity related, 35%36% pursue a multi-strategy approach and 11%6% are focused on distressed investments at December 31, 2012.2013.

The fair value of the guaranteed investment contracts is an estimate of the amount that would be received in an orderly sale to a market participant at the measurement date. The amount the plan would receive from the contract holder if the contracts were terminated is the primary input and is unobservable. The guaranteed investment contracts are therefore classified as Level 3 investments.

For a discussion of the valuation methodologies used to measure fixed maturity securities, equities and short term investments, see Note 4.

The tables below present reconciliations for all pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 20122013 and 2011:2012:

 

       Actual Return on Assets   Net
Purchases,
   Net Transfers     
   Balance at   Still Held at   Sold During   Sales, and   In (Out) of   Balance at 
2012  January 1,   December 31,   the Year   Settlements   Level 3   December 31, 

 

 
(In millions)                        

Fixed maturity securities:

            

Corporate and other bonds

   $     10          $       1                   $     11            

Equity securities

   5                  5            

Limited partnerships:

            

Hedge funds

   355          45             $       3           $    (12)          391            

Private equity

   73          8               (12)          69            

 

 

Total limited partnerships

   428          53             3           (24)        $     -             460            

Investment contracts withinsurance company

   10                  10            

 

 

Total

   $   453          $     54             $       3           $    (24)        $     -             $   486            

 

 

2011                        

 

 

Fixed maturity securities:

            

Corporate and other bonds

   $     10                     $     10            

Asset-backed

   10                 $    (10)                 -            

 

 

Total fixed maturity securities

   20             $        -                  $       -               (10)               $     -                10            

Equity securities

   6             (1)                       5            

Limited partnerships:

            

Hedge funds

   427             5                  5               (82)                 355            

Private equity

   66             10                    (3)                 73            

 

 

Total limited partnerships

   493             15                  5               (85)               -                428            

Investment contracts with insurance company

   9             1                        10            

 

 

Total

   $   528             $      15                  $       5               $    (95)               $     -                $   453            

 

 

               Net         
       Actual Return on Assets   Purchases,   Net Transfers     
   Balance at   Still Held at   Sold During   Sales, and   In (Out) of   Balance at 
2013  January 1,   December 31,   the Year   Settlements   Level 3   December 31, 

 

 
(In millions)                        

Fixed maturity securities:

            

Corporate and other bonds

    $11            $(1)                  $5               $15          

Equity securities

   5         3                    8          

Limited partnerships:

            

Hedge funds

   391         62                (85)            $(16)             352          

Private equity

   69         2               $(1)           55            125          

 

 

Total limited partnerships

   460         64              (1)           (30)         (16)             477          

Investment contracts with insurance company

   10             (10)           -          

 

 

Total

    $486            $66               $(1)              $(35)            $(16)                $500          

 

 
2012                        

 

 

Fixed maturity securities:

            

Corporate and other bonds

    $10            $1                       $11          

Equity securities

   5                 5          

Limited partnerships:

            

Hedge funds

   355         45               $3               $(12)           391          

Private equity

   73         8                (12)           69          

 

 

Total limited partnerships

   428         53              3            (24)            $-              460          

Investment contracts with insurance company

   10                 10          

 

 

Total

    $453            $54               $3               $(24)            $-                 $486          

 

 

Other postretirement benefits plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below.

 

December 31, 2012  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3       Total       
December 31, 2013    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3       Total      

 

 
(In millions)                                

Fixed maturity securities:

                

Corporate and other bonds

    $20      $20           $17        $17         

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

     38       38            38         38         

Asset-backed

     21       21            20         20         

 

 

Total fixed maturity securities

  $-     79    $-     79       

Total fixed maturities

  $-         75      $-       75         

Short term investments

   4         4          3             3         

Fixed income mutual funds

   4         4          3             3         

 

 

Total

  $8    $79    $-    $87         $6        $75      $-      $81         

 

 
December 31, 2011                
December 31, 2012                

 

 

Fixed maturity securities:

                

Corporate and other bonds

    $20      $20           $20        $20         

States, municipalities and political subdivisions

     35       35            38         38         

Asset-backed

     20       20            21         21         

 

 

Total fixed maturity securities

  $-     75    $-     75       

Total fixed maturities

  $-         79      $-       79         

Short term investments

   3         3          4             4         

Fixed income mutual funds

   4         4          4             4         

 

 

Total

  $7    $75    $-    $82         $8        $79      $-      $87         

 

 

There were no Level 3 assets at December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012.

Savings Plans – The Company and its subsidiaries have several contributory savings plans which allow employees to make regular contributions based upon a percentage of their salaries. Matching contributions are made up to specified percentages of employees’ contributions. The contributions by the Company and its subsidiaries to these plans amounted to $123 million, $117 million $100 million and $104$100 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

Stock Option Plans – In 2012, shareholders approved the amended and restated Loews Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan (the “Loews Plan”). The aggregate number of shares of Loews common stock for which options or SARs may be granted under the Loews Plan increased from 12,000,000 shares to 18,000,000 shares, and the maximum number of shares of Loews common stock with respect to which options or SARs may be granted to any individual in any calendar year is 1,200,000 shares. The exercise price per share may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Generally, options and SARs vest ratably over a four-year period and expire in ten years.

A summary of the stock option and SAR transactions for the Loews Plan follows:

 

 2012 2011    
 

 

 

 
 

Number of

Awards

     

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

    

Number of

Awards

     

Weighted    

Average  

Exercise  

Price  

 
        2013   2012        
        

 

 

 
            Number of 
    Awards
    Weighted
 Average
 Exercise
 Price
   Number of    
Awards    
    Weighted      
 Average      
 Exercise      
 Price       
 

 

 

Awards outstanding, January 1

  6,624,609     $34.447     6,104,501     $33.082         6,535,150     $36.963      6,624,609     $34.447         

Granted

  970,800      39.605     910,200      39.957         903,975      44.408      970,800      39.605         

Exercised

  (985,359    22.517     (370,789    25.502         (871,155)     32.542      (985,359)     22.517         

Canceled

  (74,900    38.701     (19,303    34.692         (91,579)     43.975      (74,900)     38.701         

   

 

  

 

Awards outstanding, December 31

  6,535,150      36.963     6,624,609      34.447         6,476,391      38.497      6,535,150      36.963         

 

 

Awards exercisable, December 31

  4,566,021     $36.521     4,599,587     $33.405         4,496,245     $37.282      4,566,021     $36.521         

 

 

The following table summarizes information about the Company’s stock options and SARs outstanding in connection with the Loews Plan at December 31, 2012:2013:

 

  Awards Outstanding   Awards Exercisable   Awards Outstanding   Awards Exercisable 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
Range of exercise prices  

Number of

Shares

   

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life

  

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

   

Number of

Shares

   

Weighted    

Average    

Exercise    

Price    

     Number of
  Shares
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Number of
Shares
   Weighted    
Average    
Exercise    
Price    
 

 

 

$10.01-20.00

   233,778    1.0  $18.529     233,778    $18.529        154,803     0.1    $18.865     154,803       $18.865      

20.01-30.00

   952,506    4.2   24.733     814,683     24.631        723,172     3.4   24.773     723,172      24.773      

30.01-40.00

   3,212,716    6.5   36.742     1,873,805     35.967        2,761,766     5.6   36.796     1,924,554      36.224      

40.01-50.00

   1,931,400    6.0   44.095     1,439,005     44.825        2,645,775     6.4   44.265     1,502,841      44.801      

50.01-60.00

   204,750    4.1   51.080     204,750     51.080        190,875     3.1   51.080     190,875      51.080      

In 2012,2013, the Company awarded SARs totaling 970,800903,975 shares. In accordance with the Loews Plan, the Company has the ability to settle SARs in shares or cash and has the intention to settle in shares. The SARs balance at December 31, 20122013 was 5,740,2085,906,074 shares. There were 7,129,9006,838,923 shares and 1,813,2117,129,900 shares available for grant as of December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012.

The weighted average remaining contractual terms of awards outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2012,2013, were 5.75.5 years and 4.74.4 years. The aggregate intrinsic values of awards outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 20122013 were $33$64 million and $27$50 million. The total intrinsic value of awards exercised was $11 million, $18 million $6 million and $9$6 million for the years ended 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. The total fair value of shares vested was $11$7 million, $11 million and $12$11 million for the years ended 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $7 million, $8 million $10 million and $11$10 million related to the Loews Plan for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. The related income tax benefits recognized were $3$2 million, $4$3 million and $4 million. At December 31, 2012,2013, the compensation cost related to nonvested awards not yet recognized was $10$9 million, and the weighted average period over which it is expected to be recognized is 2.3 years.

The fair value of granted options and SARs for the Loews Plan were estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions and results:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012     2011     2010           2013     2012 2011      

 

 

Expected dividend yield

   0.6%     0.6%     0.7%         0.6  0.6  0.6%      

Expected volatility

   19.0%     24.1%     24.7%         16.3  19.0  24.1%      

Weighted average risk-free interest rate

   0.8%     1.7%     2.0%         1.1  0.8  1.7%      

Expected holding period (in years)

   5.0         5.0        5.0            5.0    5.0    5.0         

Weighted average fair value of awards

   $      6.53         $      8.92       $      8.57           $      6.75   $      6.53   $      8.92         

Note 16.17.  Reinsurance

CNA cedes insurance to reinsurers to limit its maximum loss, provide greater diversification of risk, minimize exposures on larger risks and to exit certain lines of business. The ceding of insurance does not discharge the primary liability of CNA. A credit exposure exists with respect to property and casualty and life reinsurance ceded to the extent that any reinsurer is unable to meet its obligations or to the extent that the reinsurer disputes the liabilities assumed under reinsurance agreements. Property and casualty reinsurance coverages are tailored to the specific risk characteristics of each product line and CNA’s retained amount varies by type of coverage. Reinsurance contracts are purchased to protect specific lines of business such as property and workers’ compensation. Corporate catastrophe reinsurance is also purchased for property and workers’ compensation exposure. Currently most reinsurance contracts are purchased on an excess of loss basis. CNA also utilizes facultative reinsurance in certain lines. In addition, CNA assumes reinsurance, primarily through Hardy and as a member of various reinsurance pools and associations.

The following table summarizes the amounts receivable from reinsurers:

 

December 31  2012         2011           2013         2012         

 

 
(In millions)                   

Reinsurance receivables related to insurance reserves:

          

Ceded claim and claim adjustment expenses

  $     5,126      $     5,020         $4,972    $5,126         

Ceded future policy benefits

   759       792          733     759         

Ceded policyholders’ funds

   35       36          35     35         

Reinsurance receivables related to paid losses

   311       244          348     311         

 

 

Reinsurance receivables

   6,231       6,092          6,088     6,231         

Less allowance for doubtful accounts

   73       91          71     73         

 

 

Reinsurance receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts

  $      6,158      $      6,001         $      6,017    $      6,158         

 

 

CNA has established an allowance for doubtful accounts on reinsurance receivables. CNA reviews the allowance quarterly and adjusts the allowance as necessary to reflect changes in estimates of uncollecteduncollectible balances. The allowance may also be reduced related to write-offs of reinsurance receivable balances.

CNA attempts to mitigate its credit risk related to reinsurance by entering into reinsurance arrangements with reinsurers that have credit ratings above certain levels and by obtaining collateral. On a limited basis, CNA may enter into reinsurance agreements with reinsurers that are not rated, primarily captive reinsurers. The primary methods of obtaining collateral are through reinsurance trusts, letters of credit and funds withheld balances. Such collateral was approximately $3.7$3.9 billion and $3.6$3.7 billion at December 31, 20122013 and 2011.2012.

CNA’s largest recoverables from a single reinsurer at December 31, 2012,2013, including prepaid reinsurance premiums, were approximately $2.7$2.9 billion from subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway Group, $900$850 million from subsidiaries of Swiss Re Group and $350 million from subsidiaries of the Hartford Insurance Group. The recoverable from the Berkshire Hathaway Group includes amounts related to third party reinsurance for which a

subsidiary of Berkshire HathawayNICO has assumed the credit risk under the terms of the Loss Portfolio Transfer as discussed in Note 8.9.

The effects of reinsurance on earned premiums are shown in the following table:

 

                  Assumed/     
  Direct   Assumed   Ceded   Net   Assumed/    
Net %    
   Direct     Assumed      Ceded       Net       Net %     

 

 
(In millions)                               ��        

Year Ended December 31, 2013

          

Property and casualty

  $    9,063     $258    $2,609    $    6,712     3.8%  

Accident and health

   512     48     1     559     8.6      

Life

   49       49      

 

Earned premiums

  $9,624     $306    $2,659    $7,271     4.2%  

 

Year Ended December 31, 2012

                    

Property and casualty

  $    8,354    $197    $    2,229    $    6,322     3.1%    $8,354     $197    $2,229    $6,322     3.1%  

Accident and health

   514     47     1     560     8.4         514     47     1     560     8.4     

Life

   51       51         51       51      

 

 

Earned premiums

  $8,919    $244    $    2,281    $    6,882     3.5%    $8,919     $244    $2,281    $6,882     3.5%  

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2011

                    

Property and casualty

  $    7,858    $95    $    1,919    $    6,034     1.6%    $7,858     $95    $1,919    $6,034     1.6%  

Accident and health

   521     50     2     569     8.8        521     50     2     569     8.8     

Life

   55       55         55       55      

 

 

Earned premiums

  $    8,434    $145    $    1,976    $    6,603     2.2%    $8,434     $145    $1,976    $6,603     2.2%  

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2010

          

Property and casualty

  $    7,716    $66    $    1,849    $    5,933     1.1%  

Accident and health

   534     49     2     581     8.4     

Life

   60       59     1    

 

Earned premiums

  $    8,310    $115    $    1,910    $    6,515     1.8%  

 

Included in the direct and ceded earned premiums for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and 2010 are $2.2 billion, $1.8 billion $1.5 billion and $1.4$1.5 billion related to property business that is 100% reinsured as a result ofunder a significant third party captive program. The third party captives that participate in this program are affiliated with the non-insurance company policyholders, therefore this program provides a means for the policyholders to self-insure this property risk. CNA receives and retains a ceding commission.

Life and accident and health premiums are primarily from long duration contracts; property and casualty premiums are primarily from short duration contracts.

Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits reported on the Consolidated Statements of Income are net of reinsurance recoveries of $1.5 billion, $1.3$1.5 billion and $1.1$1.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and 2010, including $712 million, $814 million $790 million and $735$790 million related to the significant third party captive program discussed above.

The impact of reinsurance on life insurance inforce is shown in the following table:

 

December 31  Direct   Assumed    Ceded   Net                Direct   Assumed     Ceded         Net          

 

 
(In millions)                                

2013

  $5,127     -      $    5,118      $9         

2012

  $    5,713     -      $    5,702    $        11           5,713     -       5,702       11         

2011

   6,528     -       6,515     13           6,528     -       6,515       13         

2010

   8,015     -       8,001     14        

As of December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, CNA has ceded $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion of claim and claim adjustment expense reserves, future policy benefits and policyholders’ funds as a result of business operations sold in prior years. Subject to certain exceptions, the purchasers assumed the third party reinsurance credit risk of the sold business.

Note 17.18.  Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

 

2012 Quarter Ended  Dec. 31  Sept. 30   June 30   March 31  

 

 
(In millions, except per share data)               

Total revenues

  $3,705   $3,715    $3,388    $3,744    

Net income (loss) (a)

   (32  177     56     367    

Per share-basic

   (0.08  0.45     0.14     0.93    

Per share-diluted

   (0.08  0.45     0.14     0.92    

2011 Quarter Ended

        
2013 Quarter Ended  Dec. 31 Sept. 30   June 30   March 31  

 
(In millions, except per share data)              

Total revenues

    $  3,890     $  3,704       $  3,725       $  3,734     

Net income (loss) (a)

   (198  282      269      242     

Per share-basic and diluted

   (0.51  0.73      0.69      0.62     
2012 Quarter Ended              

 

 

Total revenues

  $  3,481      $  3,438      $  3,542        $  3,668        $  3,705     $  3,715       $  3,388       $  3,744     

Net income (b)

   271       162       250         379    

Net income (loss) (b)

   (32  177      56      367     

Per share-basic

   0.68       0.41       0.61         0.92       (0.08  0.45      0.14      0.93     

Per share-diluted

   0.68       0.40       0.61         0.92       (0.08  0.45      0.14      0.92     

The sum of the quarterly per share amounts may not equal per share amounts reported for year-to-date periods. This is due to changes in the number of weighted average shares outstanding and the effects of rounding for each period.

 

(a)

Net income (loss) for the fourth quarter of 2013 includes a ceiling test impairment charge of $52 million at HighMount related to the carrying value of its natural gas and oil properties, a $398 million goodwill impairment charge and the impact of a $111 million deferred gain under retroactive reinsurance accounting at CNA.

(b)

Net income (loss) for the fourth quarter of 2012 includes an after tax non-casha ceiling test impairment charge of $97 million at HighMount related to the carrying value of its natural gas and oil properties and catastrophe impacts incurred, net of reinsurance and including reinstatement premiums of $171 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) recorded at CNA related to Storm Sandy.

(b)

Net income for the fourth quarter of 2011 was impacted by CNA unlocking assumptions related to its payout annuity contracts, resulting in a loss recognition of $104 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests), as further discussed in Note 1.

Note 18.19.  Legal Proceedings

The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. The outcome of this litigation will not, in the opinion of management, materially affect the Company’s results of operations or equity.

Note 19.20.  Commitments and Contingencies

Guarantees

In the course of selling business entities and assets to third parties, CNA has agreed to indemnify purchasers for losses arising out of breaches of representation and warranties with respect to the business entities or assets being sold, including, in certain cases, losses arising from undisclosed liabilities or certain named litigation. Such indemnification agreements may include provisions generallythat survive for periods ranging from nine months following the applicable closing date to the expiration of the relevant statutes of limitation.indefinitely. As of December 31, 2012,2013, the aggregate amount of quantifiable indemnification agreements in effect for sales of business entities, assets and third party loans was $725$702 million.

In addition, CNA has agreed to provide indemnification to third party purchasers for certain losses associated with sold business entities or assets that are not limited by a contractual monetary amount. As of December 31, 2012,2013, CNA had outstanding unlimited indemnifications in connection with the sales of certain of its business entities or assets that included tax liabilities arising prior to a purchaser’s ownership of an entity or asset, defects in title at the time of sale, employee claims arising prior to closing and in some cases losses arising from certain litigation and undisclosed liabilities. These indemnification agreements survive until the applicable statutes of limitation expire, or until the agreed upon contract terms expire.

Offshore Rig Purchase Obligations

Diamond Offshore has entered into fouris financially obligated under three turnkey construction contracts with Hyundai Heavy Industries, Co. Ltd., (“Hyundai”) for the construction of fourthree dynamically positioned, ultra-deepwater drillships with deliveries scheduledexpected delivery dates in the second and fourththird quarters of 20132014 and the first quarter of 2015. Diamond Offshore expects the aggregate cost of the construction of its drillships to be approximately $1.9 billion. The remaining contractual payments aggregating $1.2 billion due to Hyundai will be paid when the remaining drillships are delivered.

Diamond Offshore is also financially obligated under an agreement for the construction of a moored semisubmersible rig with an expected completion date in the second and fourth quartersthird quarter of 2014. The aggregate cost of the four drillships, including commissioning, spares and project management, is expected to be approximately $2.6 billion, of which approximately $650 million has been paid. These amounts are included in Construction in process within Property, plant and equipment in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining $2.0 billion will be paid upon delivery of the drillships in 2013 and 2014.

In December of 2011 and August of 2012, Diamond Offshore entered into agreements for the construction of two moored semisubmersible rigs designed to operate in water depths up to 6,000 feet with expected completion dates in the third quarter of 2013 and the second quarter of 2014. The rigs will be constructed utilizing the hulls of two of Diamond Offshore’s mid-water floaters and the aggregate cost of the two rigs,rig, including commissioning, spares and project management costs, is estimated to be approximately $680$370 million. Remaining contractual payments of $54 million are payable during 2014 as construction milestones are met.

Diamond Offshore entered into a vessel modification agreement for enhancements to a mid-water floater that will enable the rig to work in the North Sea, with an expected completion date in the second quarter of 2014. The total cost of the project is estimated to be approximately $120 million, including shipyard costs, owner-furnished equipment and labor, commissioning and capital spares. Remaining contractual payments of $10 million are payable during 2014 as construction milestones are met.

Diamond Offshore entered into a construction contract with Hyundai for the construction of a dynamically positioned, ultra-deepwater harsh environment semisubmersible drilling rig, expected to be delivered in the first quarter of 2016. The total cost of the rig including capital spares, commissioning and shipyard supervision is estimated to be approximately $755 million. The remaining contractual payment of $440 million is due upon delivery of the rig.

Boardwalk Pipeline

Boardwalk Pipeline’s future capital commitments are comprised of binding commitments under purchase orders for materials ordered but not received and firm commitments under binding construction service agreements. The commitments as of December 31, 2013 were approximately $85 million, all of which approximately $93 million has been paid.are expected to be settled within the next twelve months.

Loews Hotels

Loews Hotels has commitments aggregating approximately $520$175 million for acquisitions,the development and renovation of hotel properties.

Note 20.21.  Business Segments

The Company’s reportable segments are primarily based on its individual operating subsidiaries. Each of the principal operating subsidiaries are headed by a chief executive officer who is responsible for the operation of its business and has the duties and authority commensurate with that position. Investment gains (losses) and the related income taxes, excluding those of CNA, are included in the Corporate and other segment.

CNA’s results are reported in four business segments: CNA Specialty, CNA Commercial, Life & Group Non-Core and Other. CNA Specialty provides a broad array of professional, financial and specialty property and casualty products and services, primarily through insurance brokers and managing general underwriters. CNA Commercial includes property and casualty coverages sold to small businesses and middle market entities and organizations primarily through an independent agency distribution system. CNA Commercial also includes commercial insurance and risk management products sold to large corporations primarily through insurance brokers. Life & Group Non-

CoreNon-Core primarily includes the results of the life and group lines of business that are in run-off. Other includes the operations of Hardy since its acquisition date of July 2, 2012, corporate expenses, including interest on corporate debt, and the results of certain property and casualty business primarily in run-off, including CNA Re and A&EP. Hardy is a specialized Lloyd’s of London underwriter primarily of short-tail exposures in marine and aviation, non-marine property, specialty lines and property treaty reinsurance.

Diamond Offshore owns and operates offshore drilling rigs that are chartered on a contract basis for fixed terms by companies engaged in exploration and production of hydrocarbons. Offshore rigs are mobile units that can be relocated based on market demand. Diamond Offshore’s fleet consists of 4445 drilling rigs, including four new-buildnewbuild rigs which are under construction and two rigsone rig being constructed utilizing the hullshull of one of Diamond Offshore’s existing mid-water floaters. On December 31, 2012,2013, Diamond Offshore’s drilling rigs were located offshore 12 countries in addition to the United States.

Boardwalk Pipeline is engaged in the interstate transportation and storage of natural gas and natural gas liquidsNGLs and gathering and processing of natural gas. This segment consists of interstate natural gas pipeline systems originating in the Gulf Coast region, Oklahoma and Arkansas, and extending north and east through the midwestern states of Tennessee, Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio, natural gas storage facilities in four states and NGL pipelines and storage facilities in Louisiana, with approximately 14,41014,450 miles of pipeline.

HighMount is engaged in the exploration, production and marketing of natural gas and oil (including condensate and NGLs), primarily located in the Permian Basin in West Texas as well as in the Oklahoma Mississippian Lime and Texas Panhandle regions.in Oklahoma.

Loews Hotels operates a chain of 1918 hotels, 17 of which are in the United States and two areone is in Canada.

The Corporate and other segment consists primarily of corporate investment income, corporate interest expense and other unallocated expenses.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 1. In addition, CNA does not maintain a distinct investment portfolio for each of itsevery insurance segments,segment, and accordingly, allocation of assets to each segment is not performed. Therefore, a significant portion of net investment income and investment gains (losses) are allocated based on each segment’s carried insurance reserves, as adjusted.

The following tables set forth the Company’s consolidated revenues and income (loss) by business segment:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012 2011 2010       2013         2012     2011  

 

 
(In millions)                

Revenues (a):

        

CNA Financial:

        

CNA Specialty

  $3,742   $3,512   $3,516         $3,915     $3,742     $3,512       

CNA Commercial

   4,238    4,073    4,174          4,360      4,238      4,073       

Life & Group Non-Core

   1,395    1,334    1,357          1,424      1,395      1,334       

Other

   172    44    161          414      172      44       

 

 

Total CNA Financial

   9,547    8,963    9,208          10,113      9,547      8,963       

Diamond Offshore

   3,072    3,334    3,361          2,926      3,072      3,334       

Boardwalk Pipeline

   1,187    1,144    1,129          1,232      1,187      1,144       

HighMount

   297    390    455          260      297      390       

Loews Hotels

   397    337    308          380      397      337       

Corporate and other

   52    (39  154          142      52      (39)      

 

 

Total

  $    14,552   $    14,129   $    14,615         $    15,053     $    14,552     $    14,129       

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax and noncontrolling interests (a)(b):

        

CNA Financial:

        

CNA Specialty

  $788   $805   $1,046         $1,069     $788     $805       

CNA Commercial

   451    591    777          705      451      591       

Life & Group Non-Core

   (222  (386  (127)         (152)     (222)     (386)      

Other

   (137  (131  (575)         (302)     (137)     (131)      

 

 

Total CNA Financial

   880    879    1,121          1,320      880      879       

Diamond Offshore

   917    1,177    1,333          774      917      1,177       

Boardwalk Pipeline

   304    211    283          241      304      211       

HighMount

   (636  99    136          (884)     (636)     99       

Loews Hotels

   14    17    2          (4)     14      17       

Corporate and other

   (80  (157  27          (18)     (80)     (157)      

 

 

Total

  $1,399   $2,226   $2,902         $1,429     $1,399     $2,226       

 

 

Net income (loss) (a)(b):

        

CNA Financial:

        

CNA Specialty

  $465   $462   $579         $634     $465     $462       

CNA Commercial

   273    343    450          413      273      343       

Life & Group Non-Core

   (81  (191  (51)         (31)     (81)     (191)      

Other

   (87  (57  (322)         (169)     (87)     (57)      

 

 

Total CNA Financial

   570    557    656          847      570      557       

Diamond Offshore

   337    451    446          257      337      451       

Boardwalk Pipeline

   111    77    114          78      111      77       

HighMount

   (407  62    77          (573)     (407)     62       

Loews Hotels

   7    13    1          (3)          13       

Corporate and other

   (50  (98  14          (11)     (50)     (98)      

 

 

Income from continuing operations

   568    1,062    1,308       

Discontinued operations, net

     (19)      

 

Total

  $568   $1,062   $1,289         $595     $568     $1,062       

 

 

(a)

Investment gains (losses) included in Revenues, Income (loss) before income tax and noncontrolling interests and Net income (loss) are as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012 2011 2010           2013                 2012                 2011           

 

 

Revenues and Income (loss) before income tax and noncontrolling interests:

          

CNA Financial:

          

CNA Specialty

  $22   $(5 $30         $(3)    $22     $(5)       

CNA Commercial

   39    14    (15)         (13)     39      14        

Life & Group Non-Core

    (8  53          37        (8)       

Other

   (1  (20  18               (1)     (20)       

 

 

Total CNA Financial

   60    (19  86          27      60      (19)       

Corporate and other

   (3  (33  (30)         (1)     (3)     (33)       

 

 

Total

  $57   $(52 $56         $26     $57     $(52)       

 

 

Net income (loss):

          

CNA Financial:

          

CNA Specialty

  $12   $(3 $18         $(1)    $12     $(3)       

CNA Commercial

   23    10    (14)         (8)     23      10        

Life & Group Non-Core

    (4  30          21        (4)       

Other

    (13  12                 (13)       

 

 

Total CNA Financial

   35    (10  46          16      35      (10)       

Corporate and other

   (2  (21  (19)         (1)     (2)     (21)       

 

 

Total

  $        33   $        (31 $        27         $15     $33     $(31)       

 

 

 

(b)

Income taxes and interest expense are as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31  2012    2011    2010    2013   2012   2011 

 

 
  Income
Taxes
 Interest
Expense
   Income
Taxes
 Interest
Expense
   Income
Taxes
 Interest
Expense
       Income
    Taxes
       Interest
    Expense
       Income
    Taxes
       Interest
    Expense
       Income
    Taxes
       Interest    
    Expense    
 

 

 

CNA Financial:

                     

CNA Specialty

  $271     $279   $1    $351   $1         $364       $271       $279     $1       

CNA Commercial

   148      206      262      245        148        206     

Life & Group Non-Core

   (132 $23     (173  23     (71  23          (118)    $     (132)    $23      (173)     23       

Other

   (40  147     (68  161     (207  133          (113)     161      (40)     147      (68)     161       

 

 

Total CNA Financial

   247    170     244    185     335    157          378      166      247      170      244      185       

Diamond Offshore

   223    46     250    73     413    91          245      25      223      46      250      73       

Boardwalk Pipeline

   70    166     57    173     73    151          56      163      70      166      57      173       

HighMount

   (229  14     36    46     59    61          (311)     17      (229)     14      36      46       

Loews Hotels

   7    11     4    9     1    10          (1)               11           9       

Corporate and other

   (29  33     (59  36     13    47          (7)     62      (29)     33      (59)     36       

 

 

Total

  $        289   $        440    $        532   $        522    $        894   $        517         $360     $442     $289     $440     $532     $522       

 

 

Note 21.22. Consolidating Financial Information

The following schedules present the Company’s consolidating balance sheet information at December 31, 20122013 and 2011,2012, and consolidating statements of income information for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011. These schedules present the individual subsidiaries of the Company and their contribution to the consolidated financial statements. Amounts presented will not necessarily be the same as those in the individual financial statements of the Company’s subsidiaries due to adjustments for purchase accounting, income taxes and noncontrolling interests. In addition, many of the Company’s subsidiaries use a classified balance sheet which also leads to differences in amounts reported for certain line items.

The Corporate and Other column primarily reflects the parent company’s investment in its subsidiaries, invested cash portfolio and corporate long term debt. The elimination adjustments are for intercompany assets and liabilities, interest and dividends, the parent company’s investment in capital stocks of subsidiaries, and various reclasses of debit or credit balances to the amounts in consolidation. Purchase accounting adjustments have been pushed down to the appropriate subsidiary.

Loews Corporation

Consolidating Balance Sheet Information

 

December 31, 2012  CNA
Financial
   Diamond
Offshore
   Boardwalk
Pipeline
   HighMount   Loews
Hotels
   Corporate
and Other
   Eliminations   Total 
December 31, 2013  CNA
Financial
      Diamond
Offshore
   Boardwalk
Pipeline
   HighMount     Loews  
Hotels
      Corporate
and Other
      Eliminations      Total     

 

 
(In millions)                                                                            

Assets:

                                        

Investments

  $    47,636    $     1,435    $1      $8      $33    $3,935        $53,048        $46,107      $2,061       $28     $43      $4,734           $52,973      

Cash

   156     53     3       2       10     4         228         195       36     $29           10       24            295      

Receivables

   8,516     503     89       69       25     183      $(19)       9,366         8,666       498     97      143      28       74        $(145)        9,361      

Property, plant and equipment

   297     4,870     7,252       1,136       333     47         13,935         282       5,472     7,296      974      430       44            14,498      

Deferred income taxes

   119         734           (853)       -         244           517      3           (764)        -      

Goodwill

   118     20     271       584       3         996         119       20     215        3               357      

Investments in capital stocks of subsidiaries

             16,936       (16,936)       -                       17,264        (17,264)        -      

Other assets

   730     366     330       22       84     4       2        1,538         741       305     360      15      183              39         1,650      

Deferred acquisition costs of insurance subsidiaries

   598                 598         624                         624      

Separate account business

   312                 312         181                         181      

 

 

Total assets

  $58,482    $7,247    $7,946      $2,555      $488    $21,109      $(17,806)      $80,021        $57,159      $8,392     $7,997      $1,678     $700      $22,147        $(18,134)       $79,939      

 

 

Liabilities and Equity:

                                        

Insurance reserves

  $40,005                $40,005        $38,394                        $38,394      

Payable to brokers

   61        $10        $134         205         85      $1       $        $48            143      

Short term debt

   13          $6         19         549       250       21     $20               840      

Long term debt

   2,557    $1,489    $     3,539       710       203     693         9,191         2,011       2,230     $3,424      481      182       1,678            10,006      

Deferred income taxes

     483     619         37     552      $(851)       840             516     689        41       195        $(725)        716      

Other liabilities

 �� 3,260     675     432       120       42     263       (19)       4,773         3,323       734     427      121      23       690        (565)        4,753      

Separate account business

   312                 312         181                         181      

 

 

Total liabilities

   46,208     2,647     4,590       840       288     1,642       (870)       55,345         44,543       3,731     4,540      632      266       2,611        (1,290)        55,033      

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   11,058     2,331     1,624       1,715       200     19,467       (16,936)       19,459         11,354       2,362     1,570      1,046      434       19,536        (16,844)        19,458      

Noncontrolling interests

   1,216     2,269     1,732               5,217         1,262       2,299     1,887                    5,448      

 

 

Total equity

   12,274     4,600     3,356       1,715       200     19,467       (16,936)       24,676         12,616       4,661     3,457      1,046      434       19,536        (16,844)        24,906      

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

  $58,482    $7,247    $7,946      $     2,555      $        488    $    21,109      $  (17,806)      $    80,021        $57,159      $8,392     $7,997      $1,678     $700      $22,147        $(18,134)       $    79,939      

 

 

Loews Corporation

Consolidating Balance Sheet Information

 

December 31, 2011  CNA
Financial
   Diamond
Offshore
   Boardwalk
Pipeline
   HighMount   Loews
Hotels
   Corporate
and Other
   Eliminations   Total 
December 31, 2012  CNA
  Financial  
       Diamond 
Offshore
   Boardwalk
Pipeline
   HighMount      Loews   
Hotels
       Corporate
 and Other
      Eliminations      Total     

 

 
(In millions)                                                                            

Assets:

                                        

Investments

  $44,372    $1,206    $10    $85      $71    $3,284      $49,028        $47,636      $1,435    $     $    $33      $3,935          $53,048      

Cash

   75     30     13       10     1       129         156       53               10       4           228      

Receivables

   8,302     594     114     109       33     226    $(119)       9,259         8,516       503     89      69      25       183       $(19)        9,366      

Property, plant and equipment

   272     4,674     6,713     1,576       338     45       13,618         297       4,870     7,252      1,136      333       47           13,935      

Deferred income taxes

   444         499           (943)       -         119           734              (853)        -      

Goodwill

   86     20     215     584       3         908         118       20     271      584      3               996      

Investments in capital stocks of subsidiaries

             16,807     (16,807)       -                       16,936       (16,936)        -      

Other assets

   544     453     307     19       23     11       1,357         730       366     330      22      84       4       2         1,538      

Deferred acquisition costs of insurance subsidiaries

   552                 552         598                         598      

Separate account business

   417                 417         312                         312      

 

 

Total assets

  $55,064    $6,977    $7,372    $2,872      $478    $20,374    $(17,869)      $75,268        $58,482      $7,247    $7,946      $2,555     $488      $21,109       $(17,806)       $80,021      

 

 

Liabilities and Equity:

                                        

Insurance reserves

  $37,554                $37,554        $40,005                        $40,005      

Payable to brokers

   72    $8    $1    $36        $45       162         61           $10         $134           205      

Short term debt

   83          $5         88         13            $6               19      

Long term debt

   2,525     1,488     3,398     700       208     694    $(100)       8,913         2,557      $1,489    $3,539      710      203       693           9,191      

Deferred income taxes

     530     493       51     491     (943)       622             483     619        37       552       $(851)        840      

Other liabilities

   2,971     594     373     104       20     266     (19)       4,309         3,260       675     432      120      42       263       (19)        4,773      

Separate account business

   417                 417         312                         312      

 

 

Total liabilities

   43,622     2,620     4,265     840       284     1,496     (1,062)       52,065         46,208       2,647     4,590      840      288       1,642       (870)        55,345      

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   10,315     2,209     1,951     2,032       194     18,878     (16,807)       18,772         11,058       2,331     1,624      1,715      200       19,467       (16,936)        19,459      

Noncontrolling interests

   1,127     2,148     1,156             4,431         1,216       2,269     1,732                    5,217      

 

 

Total equity

   11,442     4,357     3,107     2,032       194     18,878     (16,807)       23,203         12,274       4,600     3,356      1,715      200       19,467       (16,936)        24,676      

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

  $    55,064    $      6,977    $      7,372    $      2,872      $        478    $    20,374    $  (17,869)      $    75,268        $58,482      $7,247    $7,946      $2,555     $488      $    21,109       $  (17,806)       $    80,021      

 

 

Loews Corporation

Consolidating Statement of Income Information

 

Year Ended December 31,
2012
  CNA
Financial
 Diamond
Offshore
 Boardwalk
Pipeline
 HighMount Loews
Hotels
 Corporate
and Other
   Eliminations   Total 
Year Ended December 31, 2013  CNA
Financial
      Diamond
Offshore
 Boardwalk
Pipeline
   HighMount     Loews  
Hotels
   Corporate
and Other
      Eliminations      Total        

 

 
(In millions)                                                             

Revenues:

                                 

Insurance premiums

  $    6,882           $    6,882            $7,271                       $7,271         

Net investment income

   2,282   $5       $1   $61         2,349             2,450       $    $1           $141            2,593         

Intercompany interest and dividends

                683      $(683)         -                         736        $(736)         -         

Investment gains (losses)

   60    $(3)          57             27           $(1)                26         

Contract drilling revenues

        2,936             2,936                 2,844                    2,844         

Other

   323    131            1,187    $297            396    1       (7)         2,328             365        81     1,231       260     $380                 2,319         

 

 

Total

   9,547 ��  3,072      1,184     297    397    745       (690)         14,552             10,113        2,926     1,232       259      380      879        (736)          15,053         

 

 

Expenses:

                                 

Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits

   5,896            5,896             5,947                        5,947         

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

   1,274            1,274             1,362                        1,362         

Contract drilling expenses

    1,537           1,537                 1,573                   1,573         

Other operating expenses

   1,327    572    717    919    372    106       (7)         4,006             1,318        554    776      543      375      98            3,664         

Impairment of goodwill

        52      584                 636         

Interest

   170    46    166    14    11    40       (7)         440             166        25    163      17      9      62            442         

 

 

Total

   8,667    2,155    883    933    383    146       (14)         13,153             8,793        2,152    991      1,144      384      160        -          13,624         

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax

   880    917    301    (636  14    599       (676)         1,399             1,320        774    241      (885)     (4    719        (736)         1,429         

Income tax (expense) benefit

   (247  (223  (70  229    (7  29         (289)            (378)       (245  (56)     311      1                 (360)        

 

 

Net income (loss)

   633    694    231    (407  7    628       (676)         1,110             942        529    185      (574)     (3    726        (736)         1,069         

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (63  (357  (122        (542)            (95)       (272  (107)                  (474)        

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation

  $570   $337   $109   $      (407 $7   $628      $        (676)        $568            $847       $257    $78      $(574)    $(3   $726        $(736)        $595         

 

 

Loews Corporation

Consolidating Statement of Income Information

 

Year Ended December 31, 2011  CNA
Financial
 Diamond
Offshore
 Boardwalk
Pipeline
   HighMount Loews
Hotels
 Corporate
and Other
 Eliminations Total 
Year Ended December 31, 2012  CNA
Financial
      Diamond 
Offshore 
 Boardwalk
Pipeline
 HighMount    Loews   
Hotels
    Corporate
 and Other
      Eliminations      Total         

 

 
(In millions)                                                       

Revenues:

                              

Insurance premiums

  $6,603          $6,603           $6,882                     $6,882          

Net investment income

   2,054   $7        $1   $1     2,063            2,282       $     $1     $61           2,349          

Intercompany interest and dividends

         624   $(624  -                      683      $(683)         -          

Investment gains (losses)

   (19  1       $(34     (52)           60        $(3)                57          

Contract drilling revenues

    3,254            3,254                2,936                  2,936          

Other

   325    73     $1,144     390    336    (2  (5  2,261            323        131     1,187     $297    396      1       (7)         2,328          

 

 

Total

   8,963    3,335      1,144     356    337    623    (629    14,129            9,547        3,072     1,184     297    397      745       (690)          14,552          

 

 

Expenses:

                              

Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits

   5,489           5,489            5,896                      5,896          

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

   1,176           1,176            1,274                      1,274          

Contract drilling expenses

    1,549          1,549                1,537                 1,537          

Other operating expenses

   1,234    535    760      245    311    87    (5  3,167            1,327        572    717    919    372      106       (7)         4,006          

Interest

   185    73    173      46    9    44    (8  522            170        46    166    14    11      40       (7)         440          

 

 

Total

   8,084    2,157    933      291    320    131    (13  11,903            8,667        2,155    883    933    383      146       (14)         13,153          

 

 

Income before income tax

   879    1,178    211      65    17    492    (616  2,226         

Income (loss) before income tax

   880        917    301    (636  14      599       (676)         1,399          

Income tax (expense) benefit

   (244  (250  (57)     (24  (4  47     (532)           (247)       (223  (70  229    (7    29           (289)         

 

 

Net income

   635    928    154      41    13    539    (616  1,694         

Net income (loss)

   633        694    231    (407  7      628       (676)         1,110          

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (78  (477  (77)         (632)           (63)       (357  (122              (542)         

 

 

Net income attributable to Loews Corporation

  $557   $451   $77     $41   $13   $539   $(616 $1,062         

Net income (loss) attributable to Loews Corporation

  $570       $337   $109    $(407 $7     $628      $(676)        $568          

 

 

Loews Corporation

Consolidating Statement of Income Information

 

Year Ended December 31, 2010  CNA
Financial
   Diamond
Offshore
   Boardwalk
Pipeline
   HighMount   Loews
Hotels
   Corporate
and Other
   Eliminations   Total 
Year Ended December 31, 2011  CNA
Financial
   Diamond 
Offshore 
 Boardwalk
Pipeline
   HighMount      Loews   
Hotels
    Corporate
 and Other
   Eliminations      Total         

 

 
(In millions)                                                                 

Revenues:

                                    

Insurance premiums

  $    6,515                 $6,515            $6,603                    $6,603          

Net investment income

   2,316     $3      $1      $    $        187        2,508             2,054     $       $1     $1          2,063          

Intercompany interest and dividends

             720     $      (720)     –                        624     $(624)         -          

Investment gains (losses)

   86         $(30)           56             (19          $(34)               (52)         

Contract drilling revenues

         3,230                 3,230                3,254                   3,254          

Other

   291      128             1,128             455              307      (3)       2,306             325      73     $1,144     390      336      (2    (5)         2,261          

 

 

Total

   9,208      3,361       1,129     425      308      904      (720)     14,615             8,963      3,335     1,144     356      337      623      (629)          14,129          

 

 

Expenses:

                                    

Insurance claims and policyholders’ benefits

   4,985                  4,985             5,489                     5,489          

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

   1,168                  1,168             1,176                     1,176          

Contract drilling expenses

     1,391                1,391                1,549                 ��1,549          

Other operating expenses

   1,777      546      695      258      296      80        3,652             1,234      535    760      245      311      87      (5)         3,167          

Interest

   157      91      151      61      10      55      (8)     517             185      73    173      46      9      44      (8)         522          

 

 

Total

   8,087      2,028      846      319      306      135      (8)       11,713             8,084      2,157    933      291      320      131      (13)         11,903          

 

 

Income before income tax

   1,121      1,333      283      106           769      (712)     2,902             879      1,178    211      65      17      492      (616)         2,226          

Income tax expense

   (335)     (413)     (73)     (48)     (1)     (24)       (894)         

 

Income from continuing operations

   786      920      210      58           745      (712)     2,008          

Discontinued operations, net

   (20)                 (20)         

Income tax (expense) benefit

   (244    (250  (57)     (24)     (4    47          (532)         

 

 

Net income

   766      920      210      58           745      (712)     1,988             635      928    154      41      13      539      (616)         1,694          

Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (129)     (474)     (96)             (699)            (78    (477  (77)                 (632)         

 

 

Net income attributable to Loews Corporation

  $637     $446     $114     $58     $    $745     $(712)    $1,289            $557     $451    $77      $41     $13     $539     $(616)        $1,062          

 

 

Note 23. Subsequent Event

On February 10, 2014, CNA entered into a definitive agreement to sell the majority of its run-off annuity and pension deposit business through the sale of the common stock of CAC and a 100% coinsurance agreement on a separate small block of annuity business outside of CAC.

The business being sold is currently reported within Life & Group Non-Core. As of December 31, 2013, gross insurance reserves for this business were approximately $3.4 billion. Results for this business were net income (after noncontrolling interests) of approximately $28 million and $7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and a net loss of approximately $111 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The sale is subject to regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions and is expected to close in the first half of 2014. An impairment loss of approximately $200 million (after tax and noncontrolling interests) will be recorded in the first quarter of 2014. This Page Intentionally Left Blankbusiness will be reported as discontinued operations in the first quarter of 2014.

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) which is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the federal securities laws, including this Report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management on a timely basis to allow decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company’s principal executive officer (“(��CEO”) and principal financial officer (“CFO”) undertook an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Report. The CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2012.2013.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the implementing rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company included a report of management’s assessment of the design and effectiveness of its internal controls as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.2013. The independent registered public accounting firm of the Company reported on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012.2013. Management’s report and the independent registered public accounting firm’s report are included in Item 8 of this Report under the captions entitled “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and are incorporated herein by reference.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) identified in connection with the foregoing evaluation that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2012,2013, that have materially affected or that are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.  Other Information.

None.

PART III

Except as set forth below and under Executive Officers of the Registrant in Part I of this Report, the information called for by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) has been omitted as Registrant intends to include such information in its definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after the close of its fiscal year.

PART IV

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) 1.  Financial Statements:

The financial statements above appear under Item 8. The following additional financial data should be read in conjunction with those financial statements. Schedules not included with these additional financial data have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

   

Page
Number

2.  Financial Statement Schedules:

  

Loews Corporation and Subsidiaries:

  

Schedule I–Condensed financial information of Registrant as of December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

  L–1189

Schedule II–Valuation and qualifying accounts for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

  L–3191

Schedule V–Supplemental information concerning property and casualty insurance operations as of December 31, 20122013 and 20112012 and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 20102011

  L–4192

 

   

Description

  

Exhibit
Number

  

3. Exhibits:

  

(3)

  

Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws

  
  

Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated August 11, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009

  

3.01

  

By-Laws of the Registrant as amended through October 9, 2007, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q filed October 31, 2007

  

3.02

(4)

  

Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

  
  

The Registrant hereby agrees to furnish to the Commission upon request copies of instruments with respect to long term debt, pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K

  

(10)

  

Material Contracts

  
  

Loews Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan amended and restated as of January 1, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008

  

+

10.01


+

   

Description

  

Exhibit
Number

 
  

Loews Corporation Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers, as amended through October 30, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.02 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009

  

10.02+

10.02    


  

Loews Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A to Registrant’s Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on March 26, 2012

  

10.03+

10.03    


  

Separation Agreement, dated as of May 7, 2008, by and among Registrant, Lorillard, Inc., Lorillard Tobacco Company, Lorillard Licensing Company LLC, One Park Media Services, Inc. and Plisa, S.A., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008

   10.04   
  

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 14, 2012 between Registrant and Andrew H. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.05 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011

  

10.05+

10.05


  

Amendment dated as of February 15, 2013 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Registrant and Andrew H. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.06 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012

  

10.06+

Amendment dated as of February 13, 2014 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Registrant and Andrew H. Tisch

+

10.06

*  


10.07*

+
  

Supplemental Retirement Agreement dated January 1, 2002 between Registrant and Andrew H. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001

  

10.08+

10.07


  

Amendment No. 1 dated January 1, 2003 to Supplemental Retirement Agreement between Registrant and Andrew H. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002

  

10.09+

10.08


  

Amendment No. 2 dated January 1, 2004 to Supplemental Retirement Agreement between Registrant and Andrew H. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003

  

10.10+

10.09


  

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 14, 2012 between Registrant and James S. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.09 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011

  

10.11+

10.10


  

Amendment dated as of February 15, 2013 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Registrant and James S. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012

  

10.12+

Amendment dated as of February 13, 2014 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Registrant and James S. Tisch

+

10.11*


10.13*

+
  

Supplemental Retirement Agreement dated January 1, 2002 between Registrant and James S. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001

  

10.14+

10.12


  

Amendment No. 1 dated January 1, 2003 to Supplemental Retirement Agreement between Registrant and James S. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002

  

10.15+

Description

+

10.13

Exhibit

Number
  

Amendment No. 2 dated January 1, 2004 to Supplemental Retirement Agreement between Registrant and James S. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003

  

10.16+

10.14


Description

Exhibit
Number

  
  

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of February 14, 2012 between Registrant and Jonathan M. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011

  

10.17+

10.15


  

Amendment dated as of February 15, 2013 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Registrant and Jonathan M. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012

  

10.18+

Amendment dated as of February 13, 2014 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Registrant and Jonathan M. Tisch

+

10.16*


10.19*

+
  

Supplemental Retirement Agreement dated January 1, 2002 between Registrant and Jonathan M. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001

  

10.20+

10.17


  

Amendment No. 1 dated January 1, 2003 to Supplemental Retirement Agreement between Registrant and Jonathan M. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002

  

10.21+

10.18    


  

Amendment No. 2 dated January 1, 2004 to Supplemental Retirement Agreement between Registrant and Jonathan M. Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003

  

10.22+

10.19


  

Supplemental Retirement Agreement dated March 24, 2000 between Registrant and Peter W. Keegan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000

  

10.23+

10.20    


  

First Amendment to Supplemental Retirement Agreement dated June 30, 2001 between Registrant and Peter W. Keegan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002

  

10.24+

10.21    


  

Second Amendment to Supplemental Retirement Agreement dated March 25, 2003 between Registrant and Peter W. Keegan and Third Amendment to Supplemental Retirement Agreement dated March 31, 2004 between Registrant and Peter W. Keegan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005

  

10.25+

10.22    


  

Fourth Amendment to Supplemental Retirement Agreement dated December 6, 2005 between Registrant and Peter W. Keegan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed December 7, 2005

  

10.26+

10.23    


  

Form of Stock Option Certificate for grants to executive officers and other employees and to non-employee directors pursuant to the Loews Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009

  

10.27+

10.24


  

Form of Award Certificate for grants of stock appreciation rights to executive officers and other employees pursuant to the Loews Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009

  

10.28+

Description

+

10.25

Exhibit

Number
  

Lease agreement dated November 20, 2001 between 61st & Park Ave. Corp. and Preston R. Tisch and Joan Tisch, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q filed August 4, 2009

10.26    

   

Description

10.29  
  

Exhibit
Number

(18)

Preferability letter, dated February 22, 2013, from Independent Registered Public Accounting firm

18.01*

(21)

  

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

  
  

List of subsidiaries of the Registrant

  21.01*

(23)

  

Consent of Experts and Counsel

  
  

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP

  23.01*
  

Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.

  23.02*
  

Audit Report of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., Independent Petroleum Consultants

  23.03*

(31)

  

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

  
  

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

  31.01*
  

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

  31.02*

(32)

  

Section 1350 Certifications

  
  

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

  32.01*
  

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

  32.02*

(100)

  

XBRL - Related Documents

  
  

XBRL Instance Document

  101.INS **101.INS* 
  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

  101.SCH **101.SCH* 
  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

  101.CAL **101.CAL* 
  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

  101.DEF **101.DEF* 
  

XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase

  101.LAB **101.LAB* 
  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

  101.PRE **101.PRE* 

      *Filed herewith.

*

Filed herewith.

**

The documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) and attached as Exhibit 101 to this Report are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, are deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise, not subject to liability under these sections.

+

+Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

LOEWS CORPORATION

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Peter W. Keegan

  (Peter W. Keegan, Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ James S. Tisch

  (James S. Tisch, President,
  Chief Executive Officer and Director)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Peter W. Keegan

  (Peter W. Keegan, Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Mark S. Schwartz

  (Mark S. Schwartz, Controller)Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Lawrence S. Bacow

  (Lawrence S. Bacow, Director)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Ann E. Berman

  (Ann E. Berman, Director)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Joseph L. Bower

  (Joseph L. Bower, Director)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Charles M. Diker

  (Charles M. Diker, Director)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Jacob A. Frenkel

  (Jacob A. Frenkel, Director)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Paul J. Fribourg

  (Paul J. Fribourg, Director)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Walter L. Harris

  (Walter L. Harris, Director)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Philip A. Laskawy

  (Philip A. Laskawy, Director)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Ken Miller

  (Ken Miller, Director)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Gloria R. Scott

  (Gloria R. Scott, Director)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Andrew H. Tisch

  (Andrew H. Tisch, Director)

Dated:    February 22, 2013

24, 2014
 

By

 

/s/ Jonathan M. Tisch

  (Jonathan M. Tisch, Director)
Dated:    February 24, 2014By

/s/ Anthony Welters

(Anthony Welters, Director)

SCHEDULE I

Condensed Financial Information of Registrant

LOEWS CORPORATION

BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS

 

December 31      2012   2011      

 

 
(In millions)            

Current assets, principally investment in short term instruments

    $2,556    $2,267       

Investments in securities

     1,332     1,140       

Investments in capital stocks of subsidiaries, at equity

     16,936     16,807       

Other assets

     34     25       

 

 

Total assets

    $    20,858    $    20,239       

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

  

Current liabilities

    $67    $233       

Long term debt

     693     694       

Deferred income tax and other

     639     540       

 

 

Total liabilities

     1,399     1,467       

Shareholders’ equity

     19,459     18,772       

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

    $20,858    $20,239       

 

 

STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

  

Year Ended December 31  2012   2011   2010      

 

 
(In millions)            

Revenues:

      

Equity in income of subsidiaries (a)

  $653    $1,193     $1,346        

Interest and other

   51     (17)     134        

 

 

Total

   704     1,176      1,480        

 

 

Expenses:

      

Administrative

   101     81      80        

Interest

   40     44      55        

 

 

Total

   141     125      135        

 

 
   563     1,051      1,345        

Income tax (expense) benefit

   5     11      (56)       

 

 

Net income

   568     1,062      1,289        

Equity in other comprehensive income of subsidiaries

   289     143      646        

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  $        857    $      1,205     $      1,935        

 

 

December 31

      2013        2012     

 

 
(In millions)              

Current assets, principally investment in short term instruments

     $3,350      $2,556        

Investments in securities

      1,330       1,332        

Investments in capital stocks of subsidiaries, at equity

      17,264       16,936        

Other assets

      33       34        

 

 

Total assets

     $    21,977      $    20,858        

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

  

Current liabilities

     $91      $67        

Long term debt

      1,678       693        

Deferred income tax and other

      750       639        

 

 

Total liabilities

      2,519       1,399        

Shareholders’ equity

      19,458       19,459        

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

     $    21,977      $    20,858        

 

 

STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

  

Year Ended December 31

 2013     2012     2011           

 

 
(In millions)               

Revenues:

         

Equity in income of subsidiaries (a)

 $        664       $        653        $1,193        

Interest and other

  83        51         (17)       

 

 

Total

  747        704         1,176        

 

 

Expenses:

         

Administrative

  91        101         81        

Interest

  62        40         44        

 

 

Total

  153        141         125        

 

 

Income before income tax

  594        563         1,051        

Income tax benefit

         5         11        

 

 

Net income

  595        568         1,062        

Equity in other comprehensive income (loss) of subsidiaries

  (341)       289         143        

 

 

Total comprehensive income

 $254       $857        $      1,205        

 

 

SCHEDULE I

(Continued)

 

Condensed Financial Information of Registrant

LOEWS CORPORATION

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

Year Ended December 31  2012   2011   2010     2013         2012          2011           

 

 
(In millions)                              

Operating Activities:

                  

Net income

  $        568     $1,062     $    1,289            $            595       $          568       $        1,062        

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:

                  

Undistributed (earnings) losses of affiliates

   14      (571)     (631)            58        14        (571)       

Provision for deferred income taxes

   67      (21)     92             (376)       67        (21)       

Changes in operating assets and liabilities–net:

      

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net:

            

Receivables

        (37)     (154)            (1)              (37)       

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

   (42)     (3)     (13)            511        (42)       (3)       

Trading securities

   (396)     420      (1,931)            (787)       (396)       420        

Other, net

   (13)     16      (39)            (59)       (13)       16        

 

 
   200      866      (1,387)            (59)       200        866        

 

 

Investing Activities:

                  

Investments and advances to subsidiaries

   262      (848)     508        

Investments in and advances to subsidiaries

     (669)       262        (848)       

Change in investments, primarily short term

   (158)     1,003      375             111        (158)       1,003        

Redemption of CNA preferred stock

       1,000        

Other

   (10)     (18)     (1)            (3)       (10)       (18)       

 

 
   94      137      1,882             (561)       94        137        

 

 

Financing Activities:

                  

Dividends paid

   (99)     (101)     (105)            (97)       (99)       (101)       

Issuance of common stock

   13           8                    13        4        

Purchases of treasury shares

   (212)     (732)     (405)            (228)       (212)       (732)       

Principal payments on debt

     (175)                 (175)       

Issuance of debt

     983           

Other

   4           2                           1        

 

 
   (294)     (1,003)     (500)            664        (294)       (1,003)       

 

 

Net change in cash

       (5)            44           

Cash, beginning of year

       5                    

 

 

Cash, end of year

  $    $-    $-            $44       $      $-        

 

 

 

(a)

Cash dividends paid to the Company by affiliates amounted to $736, $676 $616 and $712$616 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 2011 and 2010.2011.

SCHEDULE II

LOEWS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

 

Column A

  Column B   Column C   Column D   Column E   

Column B

   Column C   

Column D

   

Column E

 
      Additions               Additions         
Description  Balance at
Beginning
of Period
   Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
   Charged
to Other
Accounts
   Deductions   Balance at
End of
Period
   Balance at
Beginning
of Period
     Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
   

Charged

to Other
Accounts

   Deductions   Balance at 
End of
Period
 

 

 
(In millions)        
  For the Year Ended December 31, 2012   For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 

Deducted from assets:

                    

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   $    241     $        1     $        9     $     38     $    213            $    213              $    23            $    140            $  47            $  329            

 

 

Total

   $    241     $        1     $        9     $     38     $    213            $213              $23            $140            $47            $329            

 

 
  For the Year Ended December 31, 2011   For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 

Deducted from assets:

                    

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   $    404     $        6     $        69     $     238     $    241            $241              $1            $9            $38            $213            

 

 

Total

   $    404     $        6     $        69     $     238     $    241            $241              $1            $9            $38            $213            

 

 
  For the Year Ended December 31, 2010   For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 

Deducted from assets:

                    

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   $    614     $        1     $        69     $     280     $    404            $404              $6            $69            $238            $241            

 

 

Total

   $    614     $        1     $        69     $     280     $    404            $404              $6            $69            $  238            $241            

 

 

SCHEDULE V

LOEWS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Supplemental Information Concerning Property and Casualty Insurance Operations

 

Consolidated Property and Casualty Operations                        

 

 
December 31      2012   2011            2013       2012          

 

 
(In millions)                        

Deferred acquisition costs

    $598     $552           $624     $598        

Reserves for unpaid claim and claim adjustment expenses

     24,696      24,228                24,015      24,696        

Discount deducted from claim and claim adjustment expense reserves above (based on interest rates ranging from 3.0% to 9.7%)

     1,850      1,569            1,586      1,850        

Unearned premiums

     3,610      3,250            3,718      3,610        
Year Ended December 31  2012   2011   2010        2013       2012       2011          

 

 
(In millions)                        

Net written premiums

  $      6,964     $    6,798     $    6,471          $     7,348     $     6,964     $     6,798        

Net earned premiums

   6,881      6,603      6,514           7,271      6,881      6,603        

Net investment income

   2,074      1,845      2,097           2,240      2,074      1,845        

Incurred claim and claim adjustment expenses related to current year

   5,266      4,901      4,737           5,113      5,266      4,901        

Incurred claim and claim adjustment expenses related to prior years

   (180)     (429)     (545)          (115)     (180)     (429)       

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs

   1,274      1,176      1,168           1,362      1,274      1,176        

Paid claim and claim adjustment expenses

   5,257      4,499      4,667           5,566      5,257      4,499        

 

L-4192