Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

Form 10-K

Form 10-K
(Mark One)

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 20132016

or

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period fromto

Commission file number 000-04065

Lancaster Colony Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Ohio 13-1955943

Lancaster Colony Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Ohio13-1955943
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

37 West Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio
43215
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

37 West Broad Street

Columbus, Ohio

614-224-7141
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 43215
(AddressSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of principal executive offices)the Act:
 
(Zip Code)

614-224-7141

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, without par value NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x



Table of Contents

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one.)

Large accelerated filerx Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨¨  (Do(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates onof the registrant computed by reference to the price at which such Common Stock was last sold as of December 31, 20122015 was approximately $1,275,525,000, based on the closing price of these shares on that day.

$2,138.9 million.

As of August 9, 2013,4, 2016, there were approximately 27,324,00027,423,693 shares of Common Stock, without par value, outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed for its November 20132016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Table of Contents

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1.

Business  
3 

Item 1.

Item 1A.

Item 1B.6
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
 

Item 1B.

13 

Item 2.

Properties13

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings13

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures13

PART II

Item 5.

14

Item 6.

17

Item 7.

18

Item 7A.

29

Item 8.

29

Item 9.

Item 9A.60
Item 9B.
 

Item 9A.

60 

Item 9B.

Other Information62

PART III

Item 10.

62

Item 11.

62

Item 12.

62

Item 13.

62

Item 14.

 62 

 

Item 15.

63

64

66


PART I

Item 1.

Item 1.Business

Business

GENERAL

Lancaster Colony Corporation, an Ohio corporation, is a diversified manufacturer and marketer of consumer products. We focus primarily on specialty foodsfood products for the retail and foodservice markets. We also manufacture and market candles for the food, drug and mass markets. In recent years, our strategy has shifted away from operating businesses in a variety of industries towards emphasizing the growth and success we have achieved in specialty foods.channels. We began our operations in 1961 as a Delaware corporation. In 1992, we reincorporated as an Ohio corporation. Our principal executive offices are located at 37 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215 and our telephone number is 614-224-7141.

In recent years, our strategy has shifted away from operating businesses in a variety of industries towards emphasizing the growth and success we have achieved in our Specialty Foods business. Consistent with this strategy, on January 30, 2014, we sold effectively all of the net operating assets of our candle manufacturing and marketing operations. This sale marked the divestiture of our last remaining non-food business. The financial results of these operations for 2014, previously included in our Glassware and Candles segment, are reported as discontinued operations.
As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and except as the context otherwise may require, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “registrant,” or “the Company” mean Lancaster Colony Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where it is clear that the term only means the parent company. Unless otherwise noted, references to “year” pertain to our fiscal year which ends on June 30; for example, 20132016 refers to fiscal 2013,2016, which is the period from July 1, 20122015 to June 30, 2013.

2016.

Available Information

Our Internet web site address is http://www.lancastercolony.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge through our web sitewebsite as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information contained on our web site or connected to it is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

DESCRIPTION OF AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT BUSINESS SEGMENTS

SEGMENT

We operate in twoone business segments–segment – “Specialty Foods” and “Glassware and Candles”– with the sales of these segments accounting for approximately 87% and 13%, respectively, of consolidated net sales for the year ended June 30, 2013.Foods.” The financial information relating to our business segmentssegment for the three years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 is included in Note 1210 to the consolidated financial statements, which is includedand located in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Further description of eachthe business segment within which we operate is provided below.

Specialty Foods Segment

The following table presents the primary food products we manufacture and sell under our Specialty Foods segment manufacturesbrand names:
Food ProductsBrand Names
Salad dressings and saucesMarzetti, Marzetti Simply Dressed, Cardini’s, Girard’s, Katherine’s Kitchen
Vegetable dips and fruit dipsMarzetti
Frozen garlic breadsNew York BRAND Bakery, Mamma Bella, Mamma Bella’s
Frozen Parkerhouse style yeast rolls and dinner rollsSister Schubert’s, Mary B’s
Premium dry egg noodlesInn Maid, Amish Kitchen
Frozen specialty noodlesReames, Aunt Vi’s
Croutons and salad toppingsNew York BRAND Bakery, New York BRAND Bakery Texas Toast, Chatham Village, Cardini’s, Marzetti Simply Dressed, Marzetti
Flatbread wraps and pizza crustsFlatout
CaviarRomanoff
We also manufacture and sells include: salad dressingssell other products pursuant to brand license agreements, including Olive Garden® dressing, Jack Daniel’s® mustards and sauces marketed under the brand names “Marzetti,” “T. Marzetti,” “Cardini’s,” “Pfeiffer,” “Simply Dressed,” “Katherine’s Kitchen” and “Girard’s”; fruit glazes, vegetable dips and fruit dips marketed under the brand name “T. Marzetti”; Greek yogurt vegetable dips marketed under the brand name “Otria”; frozen garlic breads marketed under the brand names “New York BRAND” and “Mamma Bella”; frozen Parkerhouse style yeast dinner rolls and sweet rolls, as well as biscuits, marketed under the brand names “Sister Schubert’s,” “Marshall’s” and “Mary B’s”; premium dry egg noodles marketed under the brand names “Inn Maid” and “Amish Kitchen”; frozen specialty noodles and pastas marketed under the brand names “Reames” and “Aunt Vi’s”; croutons and related products marketed under the brand names “New York BRAND,” “Texas Toast,” “Chatham Village,” “Cardini’s” and “T. Marzetti” and caviar marketed under the brand name “Romanoff.”Hungry Girl® flatbreads. A portion of our sales in this segment relates toare products sold under private label to retailers, distributors and restaurants primarily in the United States. Additionally, a small portion of our sales relates toare dressing packets, frozen specialty noodles, pasta and pastasflatbreads sold to industrial customers for use as ingredients or components in their products.


Sales are made to retail and foodservice channels. The dressings, sauces, croutons, fruit glazes, vegetable dips, fruit dips, frozen breadsvast majority of the products we sell in the retail and yeast rollsfoodservice channels are sold primarily through sales personnel, food brokers and distributors throughout the United States. Sales are made to retail, club stores and foodservice markets.distributors. We have strong placement of products in U.S. grocery produce departments through our refrigerated salad dressings, vegetable and fruit dips, and croutons. Our flatbread products are generally placed in the deli section of the grocery store. We also have products typically marketed in grocery aisles involving shelf-stable salad dressing, slaw dressing, dry egg noodles and croutons. Within

the frozen aisles of grocery retailers, we also have prominent market positions of frozen yeast rolls, as well as garlic breads.breads and egg noodles. Products we sell in the foodservice marketschannel are often custom-formulated and include salad dressings, sandwich and dipping sauces, frozen breads and yeast rolls. Similar

Net sales attributable to our retail efforts, we utilize our researchMcLane Company, Inc. (“McLane”), a wholesale distribution subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., totaled 19%, 18% and development resources to accommodate a strong desire for new and differentiated products among our foodservice users. The dry egg noodles, frozen specialty noodles and pasta are sold through sales personnel, food brokers and distributors to retail, foodservice and industrial markets.

In 2013, two customers, each with sales greater than 10%18% of total segmentconsolidated net sales accounted for approximately 30% of this segment’s total net sales. Sales2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Net sales attributable to one customer comprised approximatelyWal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) totaled 16%, 16% and 17% of this segment’s totalconsolidated net sales in both 2012for 2016, 2015 and 2011.2014, respectively. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of this segment’sour total net sales during these years. Although we believe we have the leading market share in several product categories, all of the markets in which we sell food products are highly competitive in the areas of price, quality and customer service.

Our

We continue to rely upon our strong retail brands, innovation expertise, geographic and channel expansion and customer relationships for future growth. Our category-leading retail brands and commitment to new product development capabilities continue to be a source of future growth for this segment.helps drive increased consumer demand in our retail channel. In the foodservice markets,channel, we attempt to expand existing customer relationshipsgrow our business with established customers and pursue new opportunities by leveraging our culinary skills and experience to support the development of new products and menu offerings. AcquisitionsStrategic acquisitions are also a componentpart of our future growth plans, with a focus on fit and value.

A significant portion of this segment’sour product lines is manufactured at our 1415 food plants located throughout the United States. However, certainCertain items are also manufactured and packaged by third parties located in the United States, Canada and Europe.

Efficient and cost-effective production remains a key focus of the Specialty Foods segment. Beyond this segment’s ongoing initiatives for cost savings and operational improvements,focus. In 2015 we completed the construction of two new production facilities ina significant processing capacity expansion at our Horse Cave, Kentucky in recent years. dressing facility to help improve throughput and meet demand for our dressing products.
Our salad dressing plant provided us with incremental capacity enabling us to achieve operating efficiencies at both the new and existing dressing plant locations. Our frozen yeast rolls plant, which was significantly expanded in 2011, helped to satisfy increased customer demand and improved operating efficiencies. In 2013, we expanded our crouton manufacturing capacity to satisfy customer demand and improve operating efficiencies as well.

The operations of this segmentsales are not affected to any material extent by seasonal fluctuations, althoughprimarily in the fiscal second quarter and the Easter holiday season when sales of frozen retail products tend to be most pronounced in the fiscal second quarter.pronounced. The impacts on working capital are not significant. We do not utilize any franchises or concessions in this business segment. The trademarks that we utilize are significantconcessions. In addition to the overall success of this segment. Theowned and licensed trademarks discussed above, we also own and operate under innumerable other intellectual property rights, including patents, copyrights, formulas, proprietary trade secrets, technologies, know-how processes and licenses under which we operate, however, are notother unregistered rights. We consider our owned and licensed intellectual property rights to be essential to the overall success of this segment.

Glassware and Candles Segment

We sell candles, candle accessories, and other home fragrance products in a variety of sizes, forms and fragrances in retail markets to mass merchants, supermarkets, drug stores and specialty shops under the “Candle-lite” brand name. A significant portion of our candle business is marketed under private label. While much less significant, we have also sold candles, glassware and various other products to customers in certain commercial markets. These commercial product lines were sold in May 2013. The sales and related operating income were not material to the segment’s results of operations.

All the markets in which we sell candle products are highly competitive in the areas of design, price, quality and customer service. Sales attributable to one customer comprised approximately 57% of this segment’s total net sales in 2013. In 2012, two customers, each with sales greater than 10% of total segment net sales, accounted for approximately 63% of this segment’s total net sales. Sales attributable to one customer comprised approximately 58% of this segment’s total net sales in 2011. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of this segment’s total net sales during these years.

Seasonal retail stocking patterns cause certain products in this segment to experience increased sales in the first half of the fiscal year. We do not use any franchises or concessions in this segment. The patents and licenses under which we operate are not essential to the overall success of this segment. Certain trademarks are important, however, to this segment’s marketing efforts.

business.

NET SALES BY CLASS OF PRODUCTS

The following table sets forth business segment information with respect to the percentage of net sales contributed by each class of similar products that account for at least 10% of our consolidated net sales in any year from 20112014 through 2013:

   2013  2012  2011 

Specialty Foods Segment:

    

Non-frozen

   56  55  53

Frozen

   31  32  32

Glassware and Candles Segment:

    

Consumer table and giftware

   13  12  15

Net sales attributable to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) totaled approximately 22%, 21% and 22% of consolidated net sales for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Net sales attributable to McLane Company, Inc., a wholesale distribution subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., totaled approximately 11% of consolidated net sales for 2013.

2016:

 2016 2015 2014
Specialty Foods     
Non-frozen69% 67% 65%
Frozen31% 33% 35%
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

The estimated amount spent during each of the last three years on research and development activities determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles was less than 1% of net sales.

BACKLOG

The nature of our backlog varies by segment.

Orders in our Specialty Foods segment are generally filled in three to seven days. In our Glassware and Candles segment, we receive certain orders in a highly seasonal manner. The timing of these orders can materially impact the amount of the backlog we have at any point in time without being an indication of longer-term sales. Due to these variables, weWe do not view the amount of backlog at any particular point in time as a meaningful indicator of longer-term shipments.

COMPETITION

All the markets in which we sell products are highly competitive. Both our Specialty Foods segment and our Glassware and Candles segmentWe face competition from a number of domestic and foreign manufacturers of various sizes and capabilities. We compete with othercompetitor branded products, as well as an increasing presence of private label goods. We also compete with both domestic and foreign manufacturers of various sizes in the United States and internationally.retailers’ store branded products. Our ability to compete depends upon a variety of factors, including the position of our branded goods within various categories, product quality, product innovation, promotional and marketing activity, pricing and our ability to service customers.


ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Certain of our

Our operations are subject to various Federal,federal, state and local environmental protection laws. Based upon available information, compliance with these laws and regulations isdid not expected to have a material effect upon the level of capital expenditures, earnings or our competitive position for 2014.

in 2016 and is not expected to have a material impact in 2017.

EMPLOYEES AND LABOR RELATIONS

As of June 30, 2013,2016 we had approximately 3,100 employees. Approximately 18%2,700 employees, 21% of which are represented under various collective bargaining contracts. 7% of our employees are represented under variousa collective bargaining agreements. Approximately 11%contract that expired on April 30, 2016. We are currently renegotiating this contract. 9% of our employees are represented under a collective bargaining agreementscontract that will expire within one year. While we believe that labor relations with unionizedall our employees are good,satisfactory, a prolonged labor dispute or an organizing attempt could have a material effect on our business and results of operations.

FOREIGN OPERATIONS AND EXPORT SALES

Over 95% of our products are sold in the United States. Foreign operations and export sales have not been significant in the past and are not expected to be significant in the future based upon existing operations.

We do not have any fixed assets located outside of the United States.

RAW MATERIALS

During 2013,2016, we obtained adequate supplies of raw materials for all of our segments.and packaging. We rely on a variety of raw materials and packaging for the day-to-day production of our products, including soybean oil, various sweeteners, eggs, dairy-related products, flour, glass, fragrances and colorant agents, paraffin and other waxes, various films and plastic and paper packaging materials.

We purchase the majority of these materials on the open market to meet current requirements, but we also have some fixed-price contracts with terms generally less than one year.year or less. See further discussion in our “Risk Factors” section below and our contractual obligations disclosure in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.Operations (“MD&A”). Although the availability and price of certain of these materials has become moreare influenced by weather, disease and the level of global demand, we anticipate that future sources of supply will generally be available and adequate for our needs.

Item 1A.Risk Factors


Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock is subject to certain risks inherent in our business. The material risks and uncertainties that we believe could or do affect us are described below. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

If any of the following risks occur, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the value of our common stock could decline significantly.

Wal-Mart

Increases in the costs or limitations to the availability of raw materials we use to produce our products could adversely affect our business by increasing our costs to produce goods.
Our principal raw-material needs include soybean oil, various sweeteners, eggs, dairy-related products, flour, various films, plastic and paper packaging materials and water. Our ability to manufacture and/or sell our products may be impaired by damage or disruption to our manufacturing or distribution capabilities, or to the capabilities of our suppliers or contract manufacturers, due to factors that are hard to predict or beyond our control, such as adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, fire, terrorism, pandemics, strikes or other events. Production of the agricultural commodities used in our business may also be adversely affected by drought, water scarcity, temperature extremes, scarcity of suitable agricultural land, worldwide demand, livestock disease (for example, avian influenza), crop disease and/or crop pests.
We purchase a majority of our key raw materials on the open market. Our ability to avoid the adverse effects of a pronounced, sustained price increase in our raw materials is limited. We have observed increased volatility in the costs of many of these raw materials in recent years. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015, we experienced a significant increase in our egg-based ingredient costs as a direct result of a highly pathogenic strain of avian influenza that affected the primary egg-producing region in the United States. This increase was very sudden and significant and it adversely affected our results for the fourth quarter of 2015 and first half of 2016. In the past, fluctuating petroleum prices have impacted our costs of resin-based packaging and our costs of inbound freight on all purchased materials.
We try to limit our exposure to price fluctuations for raw materials by periodically entering into longer-term, fixed-price contracts for certain raw materials, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in limiting our exposure to these price fluctuations. We may experience further increases in the costs of raw materials, and we may try to offset such cost increases with higher prices or other measures. However, we may be unable to successfully implement offsetting measures.

Such cost increases, as well as an inability to effectively implement additional measures to offset higher costs, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
McLane, a foodservice distributor, is our largest customer and an adverse change in the financial condition of its business could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, the loss of, or a significant reduction in, our business with the underlying foodservice customers could cause our sales and net income to decrease.
Our net sales to McLane represented 19% of consolidated net sales for the year ended June 30, 2016. Our accounts receivable balance from McLane as of June 30, 2016 was $11.2 million. McLane is a large national distributor that sells and distributes our products to several of our foodservice national chain customers, principally in the quick service and casual dining channels. In general, our foodservice national chain customers have direct relationships with us, but many choose to buy our products through McLane, who acts as their distributor. McLane orders our products on behalf of these customers and we invoice McLane for these sales. Thus, unfavorable changes in the financial condition of McLane could have a material adverse effect on our profitability. In addition, the loss of, or significant reduction in our business with the underlying foodservice customers, or other disruptions, such as decreased consumer demand or stronger competition, could also have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We believe that our relationship with McLane and the underlying foodservice customers is good, but we cannot assure that we will be able to maintain these relationships. McLane and the underlying foodservice customers are not typically committed to long-term contractual obligations with us, and they may switch to other suppliers that offer lower prices, differentiated products or customer service that McLane and/or the underlying foodservice customers perceive to be more favorable. In addition, changes in the general business model of McLane, or the underlying foodservice customers, could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Wal-Mart is our second largest customer and an adverse change in the financial condition of its business could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, the loss of, or a significant reduction in, its business could cause our sales and net income to decrease.

Our net sales to Wal-Mart represented approximately 22%16% of consolidated net sales for the year ended June 30, 2013. We believe that2016. Our accounts receivable balance from Wal-Mart as of June 30, 2016 was $16.6 million. While our relationship with Wal-Mart ishas been long-standing and believed to be good, but we cannot assure that we will be able to maintain this relationship. Wal-Mart is not contractually obligated to purchase from us. In addition, changes in Wal-Mart’s general business model, such as reducing the shelf space devoted to the branded products we market, or devoting more shelf space to private labelcompeting products, could adversely affect the profitability of our business with Wal-Mart, even if we maintain a good relationship. The loss of, or a significant reduction in, this business could have a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability. Unfavorable changes in Wal-Mart’s financial condition or other disruptions to Wal-Mart, such as decreased consumer demand or stronger competition, could also have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Competitive conditions within our markets could impact our sales volumes and operating margins.

profits.

Competition within all of our markets is intense and is expected to remain so. Numerous competitors exist, many of which are larger than us in size. Global production overcapacity has also had an impact on operations within our Glassware and Candles segment. These competitive conditions could lead to significant downward pressure on the prices of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability.

Competitive considerations in the various product categories in which we sell are numerous and include price, product innovation, product quality, brand recognition and loyalty, effectiveness of marketing, promotional activity and the ability to identify and satisfy consumer preferences.preferences and trends. In order to protect existing market share or capture increased market share among our retail and foodservice channels, we may decide to increase our spending on marketing and promotional costs, advertising and new product innovation. The success of marketing, advertising and new product innovation is subject to risks, including uncertainties about trade and consumer acceptance. As a result, any increased expenditures we make may not maintain or enhance market share and could result in lower profitability.

We may be subject to product recalls or other claims for mislabeled, adulterated, contaminated defective or spoiled food products or consumer products.

Our results of operations could be impacted by both genuinereal and fictitiousunfounded claims regarding our products, our competitors’ products and our suppliers’ products. Under adversecertain circumstances, we may need to recall some of our products if they are, or have the potential to be, mislabeled, adulterated contaminated, or contain a defect.contaminated. Any of these circumstances could necessitate a voluntary or mandatory recall due to a substantial product hazard, a need to change a product’s labeling or out of an abundance of caution to avoid any potential product hazards. In March 2010, we instituted a recall of our salad dressing and dip products as a result of a recall by an ingredient supplier.for consumer safety. A pervasive product recall may have an adverse effect on our results of operations due to the costs of a recall, or the related legal claims, the destruction of product inventory, lost sales due to the unavailability of product for a period of time, or a loss of goodwill.customer and consumer sentiment. In addition, we may also be liable if any of our products causes bodily injury.

injury or illness.


Any claim or product recall could stem from, or result in, noncompliance with regulations of the Food and Drug Administration, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commissionfederal or state law.food laws and regulations. Such an action could force us to stop selling our products and create significant adverse publicity that could harm our credibility and decrease market acceptance of our products.

If we are required to defend against a product liability or other claim, whether or not we are found liable under the claim, we could incur substantial costs, our reputation could suffer and our customers might substantially reduce their existing or future orders from us.

In addition, either a significant product recall

Adverse publicity or a product liability claim involving a competitor’sconsumer concern regarding the safety and quality of food products or health concerns, whether with our products or for food products in markets relatedthe same food group as our products, may result in the loss of sales.
We are highly dependent upon consumers’ perception of the safety, quality and possible dietary attributes of our products. As a result, substantial negative publicity concerning one or more of our products, or other foods similar to thoseor in which we competethe same food group as our products, could result inlead to a loss of consumer confidence in our products, removal of our products from retailers’ shelves and/or reduced prices and sales of our markets generallyproducts. Product quality issues, whether actual or perceived, or allegations of product contamination, even when false or unfounded, could hurt the image of our brands and cause consumers to choose other products. Furthermore, any product recall, whether our own or by a third party within one of our categories or due to real or unfounded allegations, could damage our brand image and reputation. Any of these events could have a material impact on consumer demand, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If we conduct operations in a market channel that suffers a loss in consumer confidence as to the valuesafety and quality of food products, our brands.

business could be materially affected. The food industry has recently been subject to negative publicity concerning the health implications of GMOs, obesity, trans fat, diacetyl, artificial growth hormones, and bacterial contamination, such as salmonella and listeria. Consumers may increasingly require that foods meet stricter standards than are required by applicable governmental agencies, thereby increasing the cost of manufacturing such foods and ingredients. Developments in any of these areas, including, but not limited to, a negative perception about our formulations could cause our operating results to differ materially from expected results. Any of these events could materially reduce our sales, materially increase our costs and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We rely on the value of ourthe brands we sell, and the failure to maintain and enhance ourthese brands could adversely affect our business.

We rely on the success of our well-recognized brand names. Maintaining and enhancing our brand image and recognition is essential to our long-term success and themaintaining license agreements under which we market and sell certain brands is important to our business. The failure to do soeither could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We seek to maintain and enhance our brands through a variety of efforts, including the delivery of quality products, extending our brands into new markets and new products and investing in traditional marketing and advertising. The costs of maintaining and enhancing our brands, are increasing, and theseincluding maintaining our rights to brands under license agreements, may increase. These increased costs could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We manufacture and sell numerous products pursuant to brand license agreements, including without limitation Olive Garden® dressing, Jack Daniel’s® mustards and Hungry Girl® flatbreads. We believe that our relationships with our brand licensors are good, but we cannot assure that we will maintain those relationships. Many of our brand license agreements can be terminated or not renewed at the option of the licensor upon short notice to us. The termination of our brand license agreements, the failure to renew our brand license agreements on terms favorable to us, or the impairment of our relationship with our brand licensors could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability and results of operations.
In addition, we increasingly rely on electronic marketing, such as social media platforms and the use of online promotional effortsmarketing strategies, to support and enhance our brands. This marketplace is growing and evolving quickly and allows for the rapid dissemination of information regarding our brands by us and consumers. We may not be able to successfully adapt our marketing efforts to this marketplace, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, negative opinions or commentary posted online regarding our brands, regardless of their underlying merits or accuracy, could diminish the value of our brands and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


We rely on the performance of major retailers, wholesalers, food brokers, distributors, foodservice customers and mass merchants for the success of our business, and should they perform poorly or give higher priority to other brands or products, our business could be adversely affected.

We sell our products principally to retail outlets and wholesale distributors,foodservice channels, including traditional supermarkets, mass merchants, warehouse clubs, wholesalers,specialty food distributors, foodservice distributors and direct accounts, specialty food distributors, nonfood outlets such as drug store chains and dollar stores. The replacementnational restaurant chain accounts. Poor performance by or poor performance of our major wholesalers, retailers or chains, or our foodservice customers, or our inability to collect accounts receivable from our customers, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, many of our retail customers offer competitor branded and private labeltheir own store branded products that compete directly with our products for retail shelf space and consumer purchases. Accordingly, there is a risk that these customers may give higher priority or promotional support to their ownstore branded products or to the products of our competitors or discontinue the use of our products in favor of their ownstore branded products or other competing products. If we are not successful in maintainingFailure to maintain our retail shelf space or priority with these customers this could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Increases in the costs or limitations to the availability of raw materials we use to produce our products could adversely affect our business by increasing our costs to produce goods.

We purchase a majority of our key raw materials on the open market. Our ability to avoid the adverse effects of a pronounced, sustained price increase in our raw materials is limited. However, we try to limit our exposure to price fluctuations for raw materials by occasionally entering into longer-term, fixed-price contracts for certain raw materials. Our principal raw-material needs include soybean oil, various dairy-related products, flour, paper and plastic packaging materials, wax and water. We have observed increased volatility in the costs of many of these raw materials in recent years. From 2007 through the first half of 2009, and again in 2011 and 2012, commodity markets for grain-based products, on which our food products depend, including dairy, soybean oil and flour products, rose significantly and were unusually volatile due to market concerns over grain-based fuel sources and worldwide demand. Further, fluctuating petroleum prices have impacted our costs of wax and inbound freight on all purchased materials.

Disruptions in availability and increased prices of raw materials could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. The increase in the costs of raw materials used in our Specialty Foods segment during 2007 through 2009 and 2011 through 2012 had an adverse impact on our operating income. We took measures to offset the impact of these higher costs, including the implementation of higher pricing. However, there is no assurance that we will not experience further increases in the costs of raw materials, and uncertainty exists as to our ability to implement offsetting measures. Such further increases, as well as an inability to effectively implement additional measures to offset higher costs, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Increases in energy-related costs could negatively affect our business by increasing our costs to produce goods.

We are subject to volatility in energy-related costs that affect the cost of producing and distributing our products. This is true in bothproducts, including our Glassware and Candles segment, in which we use large amounts of wax, and in our Specialty Foods segment, in which we utilize petroleum-derived packaging materials. IncreasesWhile energy costs have generally trended lower over the past several quarters, sudden and dramatic increases in these types of costs could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We limit our exposure to price fluctuations in energy-related costs by periodically entering into longer-term, fixed-price contracts for natural gas and electricity supply to some of our manufacturing facilities, but there can be no assurance that we will be successful in fully limiting our exposure to future price fluctuations.
Manufacturing capacity constraints may have a material adverse effect on us.

Our current manufacturing facilitiesresources may be inadequate to meet significantly increased demand for some of our food products. Our ability to increase our manufacturing capacity depends on many factors, including the availability of capital, steadily increasing consumer demand, toolequipment delivery, construction lead-times, installation, qualification, regulatory permitting and qualification.

regulatory requirements. Increasing capacity through the use of third party manufacturers depends on our ability to develop and maintain such relationships and the ability of such third parties to devote additional capacity to fill our orders.

A lack of sufficient manufacturing capacity to meet demand could cause our customer order times to increase and our product qualityservice levels to decrease, which may negatively affect customer demand for our products and customer relations generally, and which in turn could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, operating our facilities at or near capacity may also increase production and distribution costs and negatively affect relations with our employees or contractors, which could result in higher employee turnover, labor disputes, and disruptions in our operations.

A disruption of production at certain manufacturing facilities could result in an inability to provide adequate levels of customer service.

Because we source certain products from single manufacturing sites and use third party manufacturers for significant portions of our production needs for certain products, it is possible that we could experience a production disruption that results in a reduction or elimination of the availability of some of our products. Should we not be able to obtain alternate production capability in a timely manner, or on favorable terms, a negative impact on our results of operations could result, including the potential for long-term loss of product placement with various customers.

We are also subject to risks of other business disruptions associated with our dependence on production facilities and distribution systems. Natural disasters, terrorist activity or other unforeseen events could interrupt production or distribution and have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, including the potential for long-term loss of product placement with our customers.
The availability and cost of transportation for our products is vital to our success, and the loss of availability or increase in the cost of transportation could have an unfavorable impact on our business and results of operations.

Our ability to obtain adequate and reasonably priced methods of transportation to distribute our products is a key factor to our success. Our Specialty Foods segmentA substantial portion of our products requires the use of refrigerated trailers to ship a substantial portion of its products.for shipping. Delays in transportation, especially in our Specialty Foods segment, where orders are generally filled in three to seven days following the receipt of the order,including weather-related delays, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Further, increased line haul costs due to industry capacity constraints and high fuel costs could also negatively impact our financial results. We are often required to pay fuel surcharges that fluctuate with the price of diesel fuel to third-party transporters of our products due to highproducts. While diesel fuel costs. Theseprices have trended lower over the past several quarters, our fuel surcharges can be substantialsubstantial. Accordingly, any sudden or dramatic increases in the price of diesel fuel would serve to increase our fuel surcharges and would increase our cost of goods sold. If we were unable to pass those highhigher costs to our customers in the form of price increases, those highhigher costs could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.


Our inability to successfully renegotiate unioncollective bargaining contracts and any prolonged work stoppages or other business disruptions could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We believe that our labor relations with unionized employees under collective bargaining contracts are good,satisfactory, but our inability to negotiate the renewal of these contracts could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Any prolonged work stoppages could also have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

We are also subject to risks of other business disruptions associated withcurrently renegotiating the labor contract for our dependence on our production facilities and our distribution systems. Natural disasters, terrorist activity or other events could interrupt our production or distribution and have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, including the potential for long-term loss of product placement withBedford Heights, Ohio plant facility, which produces various customers.

garlic bread products.

Technology failures could disrupt our operations and negatively impact our business.

We increasingly rely on information technology systems to process, transmit,conduct and storemanage our business operations, including the processing, transmitting, and storing of electronic information. For example, our sales group and our production and distribution facilities utilize information technology to increase efficiencies and limit costs. Furthermore, a significant portion of the communications between our personnel, customers, and suppliers depends on information technology. Like other companies, ourOur information technology systems may be vulnerable to a variety of interruptions due to events beyond our control, including, but not limited to, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, telecommunications failures computer viruses, hackers, cyber-based attacks and other security issues. If we are unable to adequately protect against these vulnerabilities, our operations could be disrupted, or we may suffer financial damage or loss because of lost or misappropriated information.

Cyber attacks or other breaches of network or other information technology security could have an adverse effect on our business.
Cyber attacks or other breaches of network or information technology security may cause equipment failures or disruptions to our operations. Our inability to operate our networks as a result of such events, even for a limited period of time, may result in significant expenses. Cyber attacks, which include the use of malware, computer viruses and other means for disruption or unauthorized access, have increased in frequency, scope and potential harm in recent years. To date, we have not been subject to cyber attacks or other cyber incidents that, individually or in the aggregate, have been material to our operations or financial condition. While we believe we take reasonable steps to protect the security of our information relative to our perceived risks, our preventative actions may be insufficient to defend against a major cyber attack in the future. The costs associated with a major cyber attack could include increased expenditures on cyber security measures, lost revenues from business interruption, litigation, regulatory fines and penalties and damage to our reputation. If we fail to prevent the theft of valuable information such as financial data, sensitive information about the Company and intellectual property, or if we fail to protect the privacy of customer, consumer and employee confidential data against breaches of network or information technology security, it could result in damage to our reputation and brand image, which could adversely impact our employee, customer and investor relations. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We are subject to Federal,federal, state and local government regulations that could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Certain of our

Our business operations are subject to regulation by various Federal,federal, state and local government entities and agencies. As a producer of food products for human consumption, our operations are subject to stringent production, packaging, quality, labeling and distribution standards, including regulations mandated bypromulgated under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Food Safety Modernization Act. We cannot predict ifwhether future regulation by various Federal,federal, state and local governmental entities and agencies would adversely affect our business and results of operations.

In addition, our business operations and the past and present ownership and operation of our properties, including idle properties, are subject to extensive and changing Federal,federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations pertaining to the discharge of materials into the environment, the handling and disposition of wastes (including solid and hazardous wastes) or otherwise relating to protection of the environment. Although most of our properties have been subjected to periodic environmental assessments, these assessments may be limited in scope and may not include or identify all potential environmental liabilities or risks associated with any particular property. We cannot be certain that our environmental assessments have identified all potential environmental liabilities or that we will not incur material environmental liabilities in the future.

We cannot assure that environmental issues relating to presently known matters or identified sites or to other matters or sites will not require additional, currently unanticipated investigation, assessment or expenditures. If we do incur or discover any material environmental liabilities or potential environmental liabilities in the future, we may face significant remediation costs and find it difficult to sell or lease any affected properties.


Increased government regulations to limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions as a result of concern over climate change may result in increased compliance costs, capital expenditures and other financial obligations for us. We use significant amounts of water, natural gas, diesel fuel, and electricity in the manufacture and distribution of our products. Legislation or regulations affecting these inputs could affect our profitability. In addition, climate change legislation or regulations could affect our ability to procure needed commodities at costs and in quantities we currently experience and may require us to make additional unplanned expenditures.

We may incur liabilities related to multiemployer pension plans which could adversely affect our financial results.

We contribute to two multiemployer pension plans under certain union agreementscollective bargaining contracts that provide pension benefits to employees and retired employees who are part of the plan. Generally, as a contributor, we are responsible for making annualperiodic contributions to these plans. Our required contributions to these plans and, upon termination or withdrawal from a plan, we are responsible for our proportionate share of the plan’s underfunded vested liability. The amount of our share for this liability can vary at any given timecould increase, however, based upon a number of factors, including our ability to renegotiate unioncollective bargaining contracts successfully, current and future regulatory requirements, the performance of the pension plan’s investments, the number of participants who are entitled to receive benefits from the plan, a shrinking contribution base as a result of the insolvency or withdrawal of other companies that currently contribute to these plans, the inability or failure of withdrawing companies to pay their withdrawal liability, low interest rates and other funding deficiencies. An increase in our required contributions to these plans could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, if we choose to voluntarily withdraw from a plan, we would be responsible for our proportionate share of the plan’s underfunded vested liability. We currently estimate that our liability for a complete withdrawal from both plans could exceed $16 million. However, that amount can vary at any given time based upon a number of factors, including current and future regulatory requirements, the performance of the pension plan’s investments, the number of participants who are entitled to receive benefits from the plan, the number of other contributors who participate in or withdraw from the plan.plan and whether the plan is terminated. These factors may cause our required contributionswithdrawal liability to increase, which could have a material adverse impacteffect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, should we choose to withdraw from a plan to which we contribute, we may incur withdrawal liabilities that could have a material adverse impact on our financial conditionoperations and results of operations.

cash flows.

We may not be able to successfully consummate proposed acquisitions or divestitures or integrateand integrating acquired businesses.

From time to time, webusinesses may present financial, managerial and operational challenges.

We continually evaluate acquiring other businesses that would strategically fit within our various operations. If we are unable to consummate, successfully integrate and grow these acquisitions and to realize contemplated revenue growth, synergies and cost savings, our financial results could be adversely affected. In addition, we may, from time to time, divest businesses, product lines or other operations that are less of a strategic fit within our portfolio or do not meet our growth or profitability targets. As a result, our profitability may be impacted by either gains or losses on the sales of divested assets or lost operating income or cash flows from those businesses.

We may also not be ableincur asset impairment or restructuring charges related to divest businesses, product linesacquired or other operations that are not core businesses ordivested assets, which may not be able to do so on terms that are favorable to us. Further,reduce our profitability and cash flows. Finally, a buyer’s inability to fulfill contractual obligations that were assigned as part of a divestiture, including those relating to customer contracts, could lead to future financial loss on our part. In addition, we may incur asset impairment or restructuring charges related to acquired or divested assets, which may reduce our profitability and cash flows. These potential acquisitions or divestitures present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including diversion of management attention from ongoing businesses, difficulty with integrating or separating personnel and financial and other systems, increased expenses, assumption of unknown liabilities, indemnities and potential disputes with the buyers or sellers.

A future increase in our indebtedness could adversely affect our profitability and operational flexibility.

Although we do not have any outstanding debt at this time, we may incur indebtedness for a variety of reasons, including acquisitions or potential changes in capitalization that might require significant cash expenditures. A consequence of such indebtedness could be a reduction in the level of our profitability due to higher interest expense. Depending on the future extent and availability of our borrowings, we could also become more vulnerable to economic downturns, require curtailment of cash dividends or share repurchases, reduce or delay beneficial expansion or investment plans, or otherwise be unable to meet our obligations

when due. For more information regarding our debt, see the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Restructuring and impairment charges could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

We did not record any restructuring and impairment charges for the three-year period ended June 30, 2013. Future events may occur though that could adversely affect the reported value of our assets and require impairment charges. Such events may include, but are not limited to, strategic decisions made in response to changes in economic and competitive conditions, the impact of the economic environment on our customer base, or a material adverse change in our relationship with significant customers.

There is no certainty regarding the amount of any future CDSOA distributions.

The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”) provides for the distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs from anti-dumping cases to qualifying domestic producers. Our CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $0.3 million, $2.7 million and $14.4 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

CDSOA remittances relate to certain candles being imported from the People’s Republic of China. CDSOA provisions for remittances apply only to duties collected on products imported prior to October 2007. Accordingly, we may receive some level of annual distributions for an undetermined period of years in the future as the monies collected that relate to entries filed prior to October 2007 are administratively finalized by U.S. Customs. Without further legislative action, we expect these distributions will eventually cease.

Cases have been brought in U.S. courts challenging certain aspects of CDSOA. In two separate cases, the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) ruled that the procedure for determining recipients eligible to receive CDSOA distributions is unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed both CIT decisions and the U.S. Supreme Court did not hear either case. This allowed the appellate court decisions to stand, but other legal challenges to CDSOA are still pending.

We are unable to determine, at this time, what the ultimate outcome of the other legal challenges will be, and it is possible that further legal actions, potential additional changes in the law and other factors could affect the amount of funds available for distribution, including funds relating to entries prior to October 2007. Accordingly, we cannot predict the amount of future distributions, if any, we may receive. U.S. Customs has advised affected domestic producers that it is possible that CDSOA distributions could be subject to clawback until the resolution of outstanding litigation. We believe that the likelihood of clawback is remote. Any change in CDSOA distributions could affect our earnings and cash flow.

The loss of the services of one or more members of our senior management team could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our operations and prospects depend in large part on the performance of our senior management team, several of which are long-serving employees with significant knowledge of our business model and operations. Should we not be able to find qualified replacements for any of these individuals if their services were no longer available, our ability to manage our operations or successfully execute our business strategy may be materially and adversely affected.

Mr. Gerlach, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of Directors, has a significant ownership interest in our Company.

As of June 30, 2013,2016, Mr. Gerlach owned or controlled approximately 30% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Accordingly, Mr. Gerlach has significant influence on all matters submitted to a vote of the holders of our common stock, including the election of directors. Mr. Gerlach’s voting power also may have the effect of discouraging transactions involving an actual or a potential change of control of our Company, regardless of whether a premium is offered over then-current market prices.

The interests of Mr. Gerlach may conflict with the interests of other holders of our common stock.

This conflict of interest may have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock.


Anti-takeover provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.

Certain provisions of our charter documents, including provisions limiting the ability of shareholders to raise matters at a meeting of shareholders without giving advance notice and provisions classifying our Board of Directors, may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or influence our Board of Directors. This may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes of control or management, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock.

Additionally, Ohio corporate law contains certain provisions that could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control. The Ohio Control Share Acquisition Act found in Chapter 1701 of the Ohio Revised Code provides that certain notice and informational filings and a special shareholder meeting and voting procedures must be followed prior to consummation of a proposed “control share acquisition,” as defined in the Ohio Revised Code. Assuming compliance with the prescribed notice and information filings, a proposed control share acquisition may be accomplished only if, at a special meeting of shareholders, the acquisition is approved by both a majority of the voting power represented at the meeting and a majority of the voting power remaining after excluding the combined voting power of the “interested shares,” as defined in the Ohio Revised Code. The Interested Shareholder Transactions Act found in Chapter 1704 of the Ohio Revised Code generally prohibits certain transactions, including mergers, majority share acquisitions and certain other control transactions, with an “interested shareholder,” as defined in the Ohio Revised Code, for a three-year period after becoming an interested shareholder, unless our Board of Directors approved the initial acquisition. After the three-year waiting period, such a transaction may require additional approvals under this Act, including approval by two-thirds of our voting shares and a majority of our voting shares not owned by the interested shareholder. The application of these provisions of the Ohio Revised Code, or any similar anti-takeover law adopted in Ohio, could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock.

Also, our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 1,150,000 shares of Class B Voting Preferred Stock and 1,150,000 shares of Class C Nonvoting Preferred Stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of those shares without any further vote or action by the shareholders. The rights of the holders of our common stock may be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any Class B Voting Preferred Stock and Class C Nonvoting Preferred Stock that may be issued in the future. The Company could use these rights to put in place a shareholder rights plan, or “poison pill,” that could be used in connection with a bid or proposal of acquisition for an inadequate price.


Disruptions in the financial markets may adversely affect our ability to access capital in the future.Item 1B.

We may need financing in the future to conduct our operations, expand our business, or refinance future indebtedness. Disruptions in global financial markets and banking systems may make credit and capital markets more difficult for companies to access, even for some companies with established revolving or other credit facilities. Any sustained weakness in the general economic conditions and/or financial markets in the U.S. or globally could adversely affect our ability to raise capital on favorable terms or at all.

From time to time, we may rely on access to financial markets as a source of liquidity for working capital requirements, acquisitions, and general corporate purposes. Our access to funds under our revolving credit facility is dependent on the ability of the financial institutions that are parties to that facility to meet their funding commitments. The obligations of the financial institutions under our revolving credit facility are several and not joint and, as a result, a funding default by one or more institutions does not need to be made up by the others.

Long-term volatility and disruptions in the capital and credit markets as a result of uncertainty, changing or increased regulation of financial institutions, reduced alternatives, or failure of significant financial institutions could adversely affect our access to the liquidity that may be needed for our businesses in the longer term. Such disruptions could require us to take measures to conserve cash until the markets stabilize or until alternative credit arrangements or other funding for our business needs can be arranged. Disruptions

in the capital and credit markets could result in higher interest rates on publicly issued debt securities and increased costs under credit facilities. Continuation of these disruptions could increase interest rates and the cost of capital and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.Properties


Item 2. Properties
We use approximately 2.61.8 million square feet of space for our operations. Of this space, approximately 0.5 million square feet are leased.

The following table summarizes our locations that in total exceed 75,000 square feet of space (including aggregation of multiple facilities) and that are considered ourthe principal manufacturing and warehousing operations:

operations of our Specialty Foods segment:

Location

  

Principal Products Involved

  

Terms of

Occupancy

Specialty Foods Segment:

Altoona, IA (1)

  Frozen pasta  Owned/Leased

Bedford Heights, OH (1)

(2)
  Frozen breads  Owned/Leased

Columbus, OH (1)

(2)
  Sauces, dressings, dips, distribution of frozen foods  Owned/Leased

Grove City, OH

  Distribution of non-frozen foods  Owned

Horse Cave, KY

  Sauces, dressings, dips, frozen rolls  Owned

Luverne, AL

  Frozen rolls  Owned

Milpitas, CA (2)

(3)
  Sauces and dressings  Owned/Leased

Saline, MI (2)

Flatbread wraps and pizza crustsOwned/Leased
Wareham, MA (3)

(4)
  Croutons  Leased

Glassware and Candles Segment:

Leesburg, OH

CandlesOwned

(1)Part leased for term expiring in calendar year 2014fiscal 2020
(2)Part leased for term expiring in calendar year 2015fiscal 2017
(3)Part leased for term expiring in fiscal 2021
(4)Fully leased for term expiring in calendar yearfiscal 2019

Item 3.Legal Proceedings



Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time we are a party to various legal proceedings. While we believe that the ultimate outcome of these various proceedings, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, litigation is always subject to inherent uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings could occur. An unfavorable ruling could include monetary damages or an injunction prohibiting us from manufacturing or selling one or more products or could lead to us altering the manner in which we manufacture or sell one or more products, which could have a material impact on net income for the period in which the ruling occurs and future periods. In the fourth quarter

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of 2013, a previously disclosed action brought by a competitor against us in our Glassware and Candles segment, was settled through our insurers. The outcome did not have a material impact on our results of operations.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART IIEquity Securities

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock trades on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol LANC. The following table sets forth the high and low prices for Lancaster Colony Corporation common shares and the dividends paid for each quarter of 20132016 and 2012.2015. Stock prices were provided by The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.

   Stock Prices   Dividends
Paid Per
Share
 
   High   Low     

2013

      

First Quarter

  $74.70    $67.90    $0.36  

Second Quarter

  $78.34    $66.89     5.38(1) 

Third Quarter

  $78.27    $69.65     0.38  

Fourth Quarter

  $84.88    $76.00     0.40  
      

 

 

 

Year

      $6.52  
      

 

 

 

2012

      

First Quarter

  $64.15    $53.60    $0.33  

Second Quarter

  $72.04    $59.00     0.36  

Third Quarter

  $71.58    $63.27     0.36  

Fourth Quarter

  $72.42    $62.68     0.36  
      

 

 

 

Year

      $1.41  
      

 

 

 

(1)Includes special cash dividend of $5.00 per common share. This dividend was approved by our Board of Directors on November 19, 2012 and was paid on December 28, 2012 to shareholders of record on December 10, 2012.

 Stock Prices Dividends Paid Per Share
 High Low  
2016     
First Quarter$101.63
 $89.62
 $0.46
Second Quarter (includes special dividend of $5.00 per share)$118.74
 $95.47
 5.50
Third Quarter$119.80
 $95.78
 0.50
Fourth Quarter$128.07
 $107.29
 0.50
Year    $6.96
      
2015     
First Quarter$97.44
 $84.48
 $0.44
Second Quarter$96.95
 $81.96
 0.46
Third Quarter$96.43
 $86.85
 0.46
Fourth Quarter$97.77
 $87.23
 0.46
Year    $1.82
The number of shareholders of record as of August 9, 20134, 2016 was approximately 10,500.770. This is not the actual number of beneficial owners of our common stock, as shares are held in “street name” by brokers and others on behalf of individual owners. The highest and lowest prices for our common stock from July 1, 20132016 to August 9, 20134, 2016 were $86.13$132.06 and $78.06.

$124.90.

We have paidincreased our regular cash dividends for 20053 consecutive quarters.years. Future dividends will depend on our earnings, financial condition and other factors.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our

In November 2010, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization of 2,000,000 shares, in November 2010. Approximately 1,468,000of which 1,418,152 shares from this authorization remained authorized for future purchaserepurchases at June 30, 2013.2016. This share repurchase authorization does not have a stated expiration date. In the fourth quarter, we did not repurchase any of our common stock.

Period

Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
 Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
 Average
Price Paid
Per Share
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans
 Total
Maximum
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans
Maximum
Number of
Shares that
May Yet be
Purchased
Under the
Plans

April 1-30, 2013

2016
 $
 
 1,418,1521,467,846

May 1-31, 2013

2016
 $
 
 1,418,1521,467,846

June 1-30, 2013

2016
 $
 
 1,418,1521,467,846

Total


 $
 
 1,418,1521,467,846




PERFORMANCE GRAPH

COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN

OF LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION, THE S&P MIDCAP 400 INDEX

AND THE DOW JONES U.S. FOOD PRODUCERS INDEX


The graph set forth below compares the five-year cumulative total return from investing $100 on June 30, 20082011 in each of our Common Stock, the S&P Midcap 400 Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Food Producers Index. It is assumed that all dividends are reinvested.

Cumulative Total Return (Dollars)

 
   6/08   6/09   6/10   6/11   6/12   6/13 

Lancaster Colony Corporation

   100.00     150.00     185.74     216.87     259.45     310.12  

S&P Midcap 400

   100.00     71.98     89.92     125.33     122.41     153.24  

Dow Jones U.S. Food Producers

   100.00     84.20     91.31     123.54     128.96     165.67  

reinvested, including any special dividends.


Cumulative Total Return (Dollars)
  6/11 6/12 6/13 6/14 6/15 6/16
Lancaster Colony Corporation 100.00 119.63 143.00 178.01 173.40 258.95
S&P Midcap 400 100.00 97.67 122.27 153.12 162.92 165.09
Dow Jones U.S. Food Producers 100.00 104.38 134.10 161.28 180.00 213.95
There can be no assurance that our stock performance will continue into the future with the same or similar trends depicted in the above graph.

Item 6.Selected Financial Data



Item 6. Selected Financial Data
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY

   Years Ended June 30, 

(Thousands Except Per Share Figures)

  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009 

Operations

      

Net Sales

  $1,165,909  $1,131,359  $1,089,946  $1,056,608  $1,051,491 

Gross Margin

  $267,109  $240,111  $242,429  $270,332  $215,492 

Percent of Net Sales

   22.9  21.2  22.2  25.6  20.5

Interest Expense

  $—     $—     $—     $—     $(1,217

Percent of Net Sales

   0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0  0.1

Other Income - Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act

  $293  $2,701  $14,388  $893  $8,696 

Income Before Income Taxes

  $161,983  $146,031  $161,506  $175,138  $137,006 

Percent of Net Sales

   13.9  12.9  14.8  16.6  13.0

Taxes Based on Income

  $52,734  $50,223  $55,142  $60,169  $47,920 

Net Income

  $109,249  $95,808  $106,364  $114,969  $89,086 

Percent of Net Sales

   9.4  8.5  9.8  10.9  8.5

Diluted Net Income per Common Share (1)

  $3.99  $3.51  $3.84  $4.07  $3.17 

Cash Dividends per Common Share

  $6.52  $1.41  $1.29  $1.185  $1.135 

Financial Position

      

Cash and Equivalents

  $123,386  $191,636  $132,266  $100,890  $38,484 

Total Assets

  $619,964  $682,635  $622,089  $586,453  $498,481 

Working Capital

  $248,881  $319,068  $257,040  $239,446  $148,233 

Property, Plant and Equipment-Net

  $189,695  $184,130  $185,282  $166,097  $170,900 

Long-Term Debt

  $—     $—     $—     $—     $—    

Property Additions

  $24,147  $16,347  $35,343  $12,833  $11,336 

Depreciation and Amortization

  $20,114  $20,266  $18,940  $20,533  $21,870 

Shareholders’ Equity

  $501,222  $564,267  $517,539  $484,908  $402,556 

Per Common Share

  $18.34  $20.68  $18.90  $17.21  $14.32 

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding-Diluted (1)

   27,285   27,265   27,689   28,174   28,044 

 Years Ended June 30,
(Thousands Except Per Share Figures)2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
Operations         
Net Sales (1)$1,191,109
 $1,104,514
 $1,041,075
 $1,013,803
 $988,937
Gross Profit (1)$299,629
 $257,692
 $248,568
 $244,707
 $223,428
Percent of Net Sales25.2% 23.3% 23.9% 24.1% 22.6%
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes (1)$184,633
 $154,552
 $153,279
 $153,818
 $141,216
Percent of Net Sales15.5% 14.0% 14.7% 15.2% 14.3%
Taxes Based on Income (1)$62,869
 $52,866
 $52,293
 $49,958
 $48,867
Income From Continuing Operations (1)$121,764
 $101,686
 $100,986
 $103,860
 $92,349
Percent of Net Sales10.2% 9.2% 9.7% 10.2% 9.3%
Continuing Operations Diluted Net Income Per Common Share (1)$4.44
 $3.72
 $3.69
 $3.79
 $3.38
Cash Dividends Per Common Share - Regular$1.96
 $1.82
 $1.72
 $1.52
 $1.41
Cash Dividends Per Common Share - Special$5.00
 $
 $
 $5.00
 $
          
Financial Position         
Total Assets (2)$634,732
 $702,156
 $627,301
 $606,260
 $669,467
Property, Plant and Equipment-Net (1)$169,595
 $172,311
 $168,674
 $168,074
 $161,029
Property Additions (1) (3)$16,671
 $18,298
 $15,645
 $23,460
 $15,506
Depreciation and Amortization (1)$24,147
 $21,111
 $18,993
 $17,617
 $17,589
Long-Term Debt$
 $
 $
 $
 $
Shareholders’ Equity$513,598
 $580,918
 $528,597
 $501,222
 $564,267
Per Common Share$18.73
 $21.23
 $19.33
 $18.34
 $20.68
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding-Diluted27,373
 27,327
 27,308
 27,285
 27,265
(1)Amounts for 2012-2014 exclude the impact of the discontinued Glassware & Candles segment operations.
(2)Certain prior-year figuresbalances were restatedreclassified in 20102016 to reflect the impact of the adoption of new accounting guidance about the provisionspresentation of a Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position (“FSP”) ondeferred tax assets and liabilities. With the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 03-06-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.”adoption, our net deferred tax liability for all periods presented has been classified as noncurrent.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis
(3)Amount for 2015 excludes property of Financial Condition and Results of Operations$6.9 million obtained in the Flatout acquisition.


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Our fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. Unless otherwise noted, references to “year” pertain to our fiscal year; for example, 20132016 refers to fiscal 2013,2016, which is the period from July 1, 20122015 to June 30, 2013.

2016.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the “Selected Financial Data” in Item 6 and our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto all included elsewhere in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The forward-looking statements in this section and other parts of this report involve risks, uncertainties and uncertaintiesother factors, including statements regarding our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and financial performance. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of factors set forth under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements.”

Statements” and those set forth in Item 1A.

OVERVIEW

Business Overview

Lancaster Colony Corporation is a diversified manufacturer and marketer of consumerspecialty food products focusing primarily on specialty foods for the retail and foodservice markets. channels.
We also manufacturepreviously manufactured and marketmarketed candles for the food, drug and mass markets. While much less significant,markets until that business was sold on January 30, 2014. The financial results of these operations for 2014, previously included in our Glassware and Candles segment, are reported as discontinued operations.
In March 2015 we have also sold candles, glasswareacquired all of the issued and various other productsoutstanding capital stock of Flatout Holdings, Inc. (“Flatout”), a privately owned manufacturer and marketer of flatbread wraps and pizza crusts based in Saline, Michigan. The purchase price was $92.2 million, net of cash acquired. This transaction is discussed in further detail in Note 2 to customers in certain commercial markets. These commercialthe consolidated financial statements.
Part of our future growth may result from acquisitions. We continue to review potential acquisitions that we believe will complement our existing product lines, were soldenhance our profitability and/or offer good expansion opportunities in May 2013. a manner that fits our overall strategic goals.
Our operations are organized in twointo one reportable segments:segment: “Specialty Foods” and “Glassware and Candles.Foods.TheOur sales of each segment are predominately domestic.

In recent years, our strategy

Our business has shifted away from operating businesses in a variety of industries towards emphasizing the growth and success we have achieved in our Specialty Foods segment. For perspective, in 2013, approximately 87% of our consolidated net sales was derived from the Specialty Foods segment, as compared to approximately 55% of our consolidated net sales being derived from the Specialty Foods segment in 2003.

We intend to periodically reassess the strategic fit and contribution of our remaining nonfood operations in light of market conditions, capital needs and other factors. Our current strategy focuses our efforts on the most profitable part of our business and minimizes the amount of financial and management resources devoted to our nonfood operations.

We view our food operations as having the potential to achieve future growth in sales and profitability due to attributes such as:

leading retail market positions in several branded productsproduct categories with a high-quality perception;

recognized innovation in retail products;

a broad customer base in both retail and foodservice accounts;

well-regarded culinary expertise among foodservice accounts;

customers;

recognized leadership in foodservice product development;

experience in integrating complementary business acquisitions; and

historically strong cash flow generation that supports growth opportunities.

Within the Specialty Foods segment, our

Our goal is to grow both retail and foodservice sales over time by:

leveraging the strength of our retail brands to increase current product sales, introducesales;

introducing new retail products and expand to new channels;

expanding distribution;

growing our foodservice sales through the strength of our reputation in product development and quality; and

pursuing acquisitions that meet our strategic criteria.

Within

In our retail markets, our Specialty Foods segment utilizeschannel, we utilize numerous branded products to support growth and maintain market competitiveness. We place great emphasis on our product innovation and development efforts so as to enhance growth by providing distinctive new products meetingor extensions of our current product lines to meet the evolving needs and preferences of consumers.

Our foodservice sales primarily consist of products sold to restaurant chains.chains, either directly or through distributors. Over the long-term, we have experienced broad-based growth in our foodservice sales, as we build on our strong reputation for product development and quality.

We expect that part of our future growth in the Specialty Foods segment will result from acquisitions. We continue to review potential acquisitions that we believe will provide good complements to our existing product lines, enhance our gross margins or offer good expansion opportunities in a manner that fits our overall goals.

As has occasionally been required to support future growth opportunities, we have historically made substantial capital investments to support our existing food operations such as the construction ofand future growth opportunities. For example, in 2015 we completed a new frozen yeast roll facility insignificant processing capacity expansion at our Horse Cave, Kentucky that began operations in 2008 and was significantly expanded through a project that was completed in June 2011. Thisdressing facility has helped provide capacityto help meet demand for potential future sales growth and also provided greater manufacturing efficiencies. In 2013, we expanded our crouton manufacturing capacity to provide capacity for potential future sales growth as well as improve operating efficiencies.dressing products. Based on our current plans and expectations, we believe that our total capital expenditures for 20142017 could total $25 million, and perhaps more depending on the timing and approvalapproximately $20 to $22 million. We anticipate we will be able to fund all of certain food-related projects currently being evaluated.

our capital needs in 2017 with cash generated from operations.

Summary of 20132016 Results

Consolidated net sales reached approximately $1,166$1,191 million during 2013,2016, increasing by approximately 3%8% as compared to prior-year net sales of $1,131$1,105 million, driven by growth coming from both operating segments. The Specialty Foods segment’s increase reflected higherincreased retail and foodservice sales, including some benefitvolumes, pricing actions and the contribution from higher pricing. The increase in sales of the Glassware and Candles segment was influenced by the growth of seasonal candle programs.

Flatout.


Gross marginprofit increased 11%16% to approximately $267.1$299.6 million from the prior-year comparable total of $240.1$257.7 million. The increase resulted from higher level of net sales, lower materialreduced commodity costs and a more favorable sales mix contributed to the improved gross margin.

Overall results were also affected by the funds received under CDSOA. In 2013, we received approximately $0.3 million under CDSOA, as compared to approximately $2.7 million in 2012 and approximately $14.4 million in 2011. For a more-detailed discussion of CDSOA, see the subcaption “Other Income – Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act” of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”).

lower freight costs.

Net income totaled approximately $109.2$121.8 million in 2013,2016, or $3.99$4.44 per diluted share, compared to net income of $95.8$101.7 million, or $3.51$3.72 per diluted share, in 2012.2015. Net income in 20112014 totaled approximately $106.4$75.0 million, or $3.84$2.74 per diluted share.

share, which included an after-tax loss on the sale of our candle manufacturing and marketing operations of $29.1 million.

Looking Forward

Factors that are expected

For 2017, we expect volume-driven growth in our retail sales channel with support from recent and upcoming new product introductions along with increased sales from Flatout. In the first half of 2017, we expect volume-driven growth from continuing customers in our foodservice channel will be largely offset by the influence of lower pricing (due to affect our future performance includelower commodity costs, particularly eggs) and the impact of added volumes from several newer retail and foodservice programs, as well as further market expansionour customer rationalization initiative which began in the third quarter of certain key product lines. 2016.
We will also continue to reviewconsider acquisition opportunities within the Specialty Foods segment that are consistent with our growth strategy and represent good value or otherwise provide significant strategic benefits. However, continued unsettled economic conditions affecting consumer and retailer buying patterns and market acceptance of our new product lines are among
Among the many influencesfactors that may impact our ability to improve sales and operating margins in the coming year.

Withinyear are the success of our Specialty Foods segment for 2014, we anticipate volumecontinued investment in innovation and new products, growth from both retailFlatout and foodservice sales channels. No significant impact is expectedthe level of efficiency gains we ultimately achieve from pricing actions. Additionally, basedour supply chain and other cost-saving initiatives.

Based on current market conditions, we foresee modestly favorable material cost comparisons for 2014. It is possible that future changes in the economy and regulatory environment could cause increases in these costs. To help offset or stabilizefirst half of 2017, due mainly to the impact of such increases,lower egg costs and continued favorable trends in certain other key commodities. However, in the second half of 2017, we have historically pursuedanticipate a more neutral pricing environment as we anniversary many comparisons on various pricing actionskey ingredients. Future changes in ingredient costs, as well as other material costs, will be influenced by the size of agricultural harvests in both the U.S. and operational strategies thatother parts of the world and related global demand, economic conditions and the regulatory environment.
Overall, we believe will aid our future results. We are also continuingcontinue to limit some of our exposure to volatile swings in food commodity costs through a structured forward purchasing program for certain key materials.

With respect to our Glasswarematerials such as soybean oil and Candles segment in 2014, we expect our results to be challenged by weaker demand from several customers, including reduced seasonal sales, as well as by correspondingly lower production levels.

flour. For a more-detailed discussion of the effect of commodity costs, see the “Impact of Inflation” section of this MD&A below.

In order to ensure that Changes in other notable recurring costs, such as marketing, transportation and production costs, may also impact our capitalization is adequate to support future internal growth prospects, acquire food businesses consistent with our strategic goals, and maintain cash returns to our shareholders through cash dividends and share repurchases, we will need to maintain sufficient flexibility in our future capital structure. overall results.

We will continue to periodically reassess our allocation of capital periodically to ensure that we maintain adequate operating flexibility while providing appropriate levels of cash returns to our shareholders, whether through share repurchases or cash dividends, including special dividends, if appropriate.

REVIEWshareholders.

RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS

Segment Sales Mix

The relative proportion of sales contributed by each of our business segments can impact a year-to-year comparison of the consolidated statements of income. The following table summarizes the sales mix over each of the last three years:

   2013  2012  2011 

Segment Sales Mix:

    

Specialty Foods

   87  87  85

Glassware and Candles

   13  13  15

Net Sales and Gross MarginProfit
  
Year Ended June 30, Change
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 2014
Net Sales$1,191,109
 $1,104,514
 $1,041,075
 $86,595
 8% $63,439
 6%
Gross Profit$299,629
 $257,692
 $248,568
 $41,937
 16% $9,124
 4%
Gross Margin25.2% 23.3% 23.9%        
In March 2015 we acquired Flatout and its results of operations have been included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Flatout contributed approximately $42 million in net sales to our 2016 results. Flatout net sales were not material to our consolidated financial statements in 2015, with Flatout contributing $13 million in net sales.
2016 to 2015

    Year Ended June 30,  Change 

(Dollars in thousands)

  2013  2012  2011  2013 vs. 2012  2012 vs. 2011 

Net Sales

         

Specialty Foods

  $1,013,803  $988,937  $922,856  $24,866    3 $66,081   7

Glassware and Candles

   152,106   142,422   167,090   9,684    7  (24,668  (15)% 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $1,165,909  $1,131,359  $1,089,946  $34,550    3 $41,413   4
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross Margin

  $267,109  $240,111  $242,429  $26,998    11 $(2,318  (1)% 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross Margin as a Percentage of Net Sales

   22.9  21.2  22.2     
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

      

Consolidated net sales for the year ended June 30, 20132016 increased by approximately 3%8% to approximately $1,166a new record of $1,191 million from the prior-year record total of approximately $1,131$1,105 million. There wereThis growth was driven by the contribution from Flatout, increased sales within both of our segments. The Specialty Foods segment’s increase reflected higher retail and foodservice sales. volumes and pricing actions. Our overall sales volume, as measured by pounds shipped, improved by 5%. Pricing actions were taken in response to significantly higher egg costs incurred in our first half. In general, the net impact of higher pricing represented more than 1% of net sales for 2016.
Retail sales reflected the incremental benefit from some recently introduced food products. The segment’s foodservicenet sales increased on expanded volumes associated10% due to the addition of Flatout and higher sales of certain product lines including Olive Garden® retail dressings and Marzetti® refrigerated dressings, including Simply Dressed®. Foodservice net sales improved 6% as demand from national chain restaurants remained strong. As a percentage of total net sales, retail net sales increased slightly to 52% from 51% in 2015.
Excluding sales contributed by Flatout, consolidated net sales increased 5% in 2016.

Our gross margin increased to 25.2% in 2016 compared with 23.3% in 2015 due to the influence of our net pricing actions and lower commodity and freight costs. The significantly higher egg costs attributed to the avian influenza outbreak we experienced in the first half of the year were more than offset by lower costs of certain existing customer programs. Higherother raw materials throughout the year, specifically soybean oil, dairy-based products, flour and resin packaging. Excluding any pricing contributedactions, total raw-material costs positively affected our gross margins by less than one-third1% of the segment’s net sales growth for 2013. The increased sales of the Glassware and Candles segment primarily reflected growth in seasonal candle volumes. sales.
2015 to 2014
Consolidated net sales for the year ended June 30, 20122015 increased by approximately 4% over6% to a then record of $1,105 million from the 2011prior-year record total of approximately $1,090$1,041 million. In 2012,This growth was primarily driven by volume and mix. Retail net sales increased 6% due to higher sales of New York BRAND® frozen garlic bread and Olive Garden® retail dressings and the impact of Flatout, but were offset in part by increased promotional spending on some retail product offerings and placement costs for new products. Foodservice net sales also improved 6% primarily due to increased sales withinto national chain restaurants. Our overall sales volume, as measured by pounds shipped, improved by 5%. Incremental net sales from Flatout accounted for less than 1% of the Specialty Foods segment were partially offset by lowervolume increase. The influence of a more favorable sales within the Glassware and Candles segment.mix was estimated to be less than 1%. The Specialty Foods segment’s increase reflected highernet impact of pricing for both retail and foodservice sales. Higher pricing totaled approximately 4% of segment net sales for 2012. Retail sales also reflected the incremental benefit from some recently introduced food products. The segment’s foodservice sales also increased on expanded volumes associated with programs among existing customers. The decrease in sales of the Glassware and Candles segment primarily reflected lower candle volumes. In 2012, we exited certain lower-margin business, including some seasonal

candle programs. Higher pricing helped to offset some of these declines.

Our gross margin aswas insignificant. As a percentage of net sales, was approximately 22.9%sales of retail products remained relatively unchanged at 51%.

Our gross margin declined to 23.3% in 20132015 compared with 21.2%23.9% in 2012 and 22.2% in 2011. In2014 as the Specialty Foods segment, gross margin percentages improved in 2013, reflecting factors such as modestlybenefits from the improved sales volumes beneficial pricing actions and favorablemodestly lower material costs were offset by increased operating costs due to capacity constraints in our dressing manufacturing, higher freight expense, increased placement costs for new products and certain nonrecurring charges related to Flatout. The higher levels of operating inefficiencies were most pronounced during the first half of 2015. We estimate that lower ingredient costs (especially for soybean oil, flour and sweeteners). Gross margin percentages in the Glassware and Candles segment also improved in 2013, as influencedbeneficially affected our gross margins by a more beneficial customer and product mix, higher sales and production levels and lower wax costs. In 2012, gross margin percentages in the Specialty Foods segment declined, reflecting a somewhat less favorable sales mix, as well as comparatively higher costs for a wide varietythan 1% of raw materials (especially for soybean oil and flour) and freight, as partially offset by higher pricing. In the Glassware and Candles segment, gross margin percentages improved slightly in 2012 primarily due to the impact of higher pricing and an improved sales mix. These factors were somewhat mitigated by higher wax costs, lower sales and reduced production levels.

net sales.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

    Year Ended June 30,  Change 

(Dollars in thousands)

  2013  2012  2011  2013 vs. 2012  2012 vs. 2011 

SG&A Expenses

  $105,203  $96,824  $95,425  $8,379    9 $1,399    1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

SG&A Expenses as a Percentage of Net Sales

   9.0  8.6  8.8      
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

       

  
Year Ended June 30, Change
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 2014
SG&A Expenses$115,059
 $102,831
 $94,801
 $12,228
 12% $8,030
 8%
SG&A Expenses as a Percentage of Net Sales9.7% 9.3% 9.1%        
Selling, general and administrative expenses for 20132016 totaled approximately $105.2$115.1 million and increased 9%12% as compared with the 20122015 total of $96.8$102.8 million, which had increased 1%8% from the 20112014 total of $95.4$94.8 million. The 20132016 increase was influenced byin these costs reflected the influence of overall higher sales and greater marketing and personnel costs. The 2012 increase was influenced by thevolumes, higher levels of food sales.

consumer spending on our key retail product lines, as well as the new consumer and trade activities related to Flatout and amortization expense attributable to the Flatout intangible assets. The 2015 increase in these costs reflected higher consumer promotional spending on new products, transaction expenses related to the Flatout acquisition and increased amortization expense attributable to the Flatout intangible assets.

Operating Income

    Year Ended June 30,  Change 

(Dollars in thousands)

  2013  2012  2011  2013 vs. 2012  2012 vs. 2011 

Operating Income

        

Specialty Foods

  $165,710  $151,479  $155,218  $14,231   9 $(3,739  (2)% 

Glassware and Candles

   7,983   2,105   3,764   5,878   279  (1,659  (44)% 

Corporate Expenses

   (11,787  (10,297  (11,978  (1,490  14  1,681   (14)% 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $161,906  $143,287  $147,004  $18,619   13 $(3,717  (3)% 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating Income as a Percentage of Net Sales

        

Specialty Foods

   16.3  15.3  16.8    

Glassware and Candles

   5.2  1.5  2.3    

Total

   13.9  12.7  13.5    

  
Year Ended June 30, Change
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 2014
Operating Income             
Specialty Foods$196,592
 $167,095
 $165,383
 $29,497
 18 % $1,712
 1%
Corporate Expenses(12,022) (12,234) (11,616) 212
 (2)% (618) 5%
Total$184,570
 $154,861
 $153,767
 $29,709
 19 % $1,094
 1%
Operating Income as a Percentage of Net Sales             
Specialty Foods16.5% 15.1% 15.9%        
Total15.5% 14.0% 14.8%        
Due to the factors discussed above, consolidatedthe Specialty Foods segment’s operating income for 20132016 totaled approximately $161.9$196.6 million, a 13%an 18% increase from 20122015 operating income of $143.3$167.1 million. The 20122015 total had decreased 3% from 2011was 1% higher than 2014 operating income totaling approximately $147.0of $165.4 million. See further discussion of operating results by segment following the discussion of “Net Income” below.

Other Income – Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act

CDSOA provides for the distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs from anti-dumping cases to qualifying domestic producers. Our CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $0.3 million, $2.7 million and $14.4 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

CDSOA remittances relate to certain candles being imported from the People’s Republic of China. CDSOA provisions for remittances apply only to duties collected on products imported prior to October 2007. Accordingly, we may receive some

The level of annual distributions for an undetermined periodthe 2016 corporate expenses presented above was consistent with our expectations and was similar to those of years in

the future as the monies collected that relate to entries filed prior to October 2007 are administratively finalized by U.S. Customs. Without further legislative action, we expect these distributions will eventually cease.

Cases have been brought in U.S. courts challenging certain aspects of CDSOA. In two separate cases, the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) ruled that the procedure for determining recipients eligible to receive CDSOA distributions is unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed both CIT decisions2015 and the U.S. Supreme Court did not hear either case. This allowed the appellate court decisions to stand, but other legal challenges to CDSOA are still pending.

We are unable to determine, at this time, what the ultimate outcome of the other legal challenges will be, and it is possible that further legal actions, potential additional changes in the law and other factors could affect the amount of funds available for distribution, including funds relating to entries prior to October 2007. Accordingly, we cannot predict the amount of future distributions, if any, we may receive. Any change in CDSOA distributions could affect our earnings and cash flow.

Interest 2014.


Income and Other – Net

Interest income and other was expense of approximately $0.2 million, income of less than $0.1 million and income of approximately $0.1 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

IncomeFrom Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes

As affected by the factors discussed above, our income from continuing operations before income taxes for 20132016 of approximately $162.0$184.6 million increased 11%19% from the 20122015 total of $146.0$154.6 million. The 2011 total2014 income from continuing operations before income taxes was approximately $161.5$153.3 million.
Taxes Based on Income
Our effective tax rate was 32.6%34.1%, 34.4%34.2% and 34.1% in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. The decrease inGiven the 2013nature of our operations (predominately U.S. based for both sales and manufacturing), our effective tax rates typically stay within a fairly narrow range. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation of the statutory rate to the effective rate for each year.
Income From Continuing Operations
Income from continuing operations for 2016 of $121.8 million increased from 2015 income from continuing operations of $101.7 million. Income from continuing operations was influenced by an increased deduction$101.0 million in 2014. Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for dividends paid to our frozen ESOP Planeach of the years ended June 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 have remained relatively stable. As a result, and due to the $5.00change in income from continuing operations for each year, diluted income from continuing operations per share special dividend paidtotaled $4.44, $3.72 and $3.69 for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Discontinued Operations
There were no discontinued operations in December 2012,2016 and 2015. In 2014, we recorded a higher qualified production activities deductionloss from discontinued operations of $26.0 million, net of tax, or $0.95 per diluted share, including an after-tax loss of $29.1 million on the sale of our candle manufacturing and a lower state rate, asmarketing operations in January 2014. Income from discontinued operations, net of tax, was $3.1 million in 2014.
Net Income
As influenced by the release of reserves associated with uncertain tax positions.

Net Income

As influenced by factors discussed above, net income for 20132016 of approximately $109.2$121.8 million increased from 2012the 2015 net income of $95.8$101.7 million, which had increased from 2014 net income of $75.0 million. Net income was approximately $106.4 million in 2011. Diluted net income per share totaled approximately $3.99$4.44 in 2013, a 14%2016, an increase from the prior-year2015 total of $3.51.$3.72 per diluted share. The latter amount was 9% lower than 2011 diluted2014 net income per share totaled $2.74 per diluted share, which included the loss on the sale of $3.84. Net income per share in recent years has been beneficially affected by share repurchases, which have totaled approximately $52.0 million over the three-year period ended June 30, 2013.

SEGMENT REVIEW – SPECIALTY FOODS

During 2013, net sales of the Specialty Foods segment exceeded $1 billion for the first time, surpassing a record sales level set in 2012. Net sales for 2013 totaled approximately $1,013.8 million, an increase from the 2012 total of $988.9 million. Net sales for 2012 increased 7% from the 2011 total of approximately $922.9 million. 2013 operating income of approximately $165.7 million increased 9% from the 2012 level of $151.5 million. The percentage of retail customer sales within the segment was approximately 52% during 2013, 2012 and 2011.

In 2013, net sales of the Specialty Foods segment increased approximately 3%. Higher pricing contributed less than one-third of the segment’s net sales growth for 2013. Volume growth exceeded 1% of sales and was primarily derived from sales to the foodservice channel. The retail sales increase of approximately 3% reflected the incremental benefit from some recently-introduced food products, higher pricing and a reduced level of coupon redemption costs. The segment’s foodservice sales increased approximately 2% on expanded volumes associated with certain existing customer programs. In 2012, net sales of the Specialty Foods segment increased approximately 7%. Higher product pricing totaled approximately 4% of segment net sales. The retail sales increase of over 5% also reflected the incremental benefit from some recently introduced food products. The segment’s foodservice sales increased approximately 9% on expanded volumes associated with programs among existing customers.

Operating income of the Specialty Foods segment in 2013 totaled approximately $165.7 million, a 9% increase from the 2012 level of $151.5 million. The 2012 level decreased 2% from the 2011 level of $155.2 million. The 2013 increase reflected factors such as improved sales volumes, beneficial pricing actions and modestly favorable ingredient costs (especially for soybean oil, flour and sweeteners). We estimate that lower material costs beneficially affected the segment’s results by less than one percent of segment net sales. The 2012 decrease reflected a somewhat less favorable sales mix, as well as comparatively higher costs for a wide variety of raw materials (especially for soybean oil and flour) and freight, as partially offset by higher pricing. We estimate that higher material costs in 2012 adversely affected comparative results by approximately 5% of segment net sales.

SEGMENT REVIEW – GLASSWARE AND CANDLES

Glassware and Candles segment net sales totaled approximately $152.1 million during 2013, as compared to $142.4 million in 2012 and $167.1 million in 2011. The 2013 increase was influenced by the growth of seasonal candle programs. The 2012 decrease primarily reflected lower candle volumes as we exited certain lower-margin business, including some seasonal candle programs. Higher pricing helped to offset some of the 2012 volume declines.

The segment recorded operating income of approximately $8.0 million in 2013, $2.1 million in 2012 and $3.8 million in 2011. The 2013 increase was influenced by a more beneficial customer and product mix, higher sales and production levels and lower wax costs. We estimate that the lower wax costs benefited segment operating margins by over 1% of segment net sales. The 2012 decrease reflected higher wax costs, lower sales and reduced production levels. These factors were somewhat mitigated by modestly higher pricing and an improved sales mix. We estimate that higher wax costs in the Glassware and Candles segment adversely affected the segment’s comparative results in 2012 by over 1% of net sales.

CORPORATE EXPENSES

The 2013 corporate expenses totaled approximately $11.8 million as compared to $10.3 million in 2012 and $12.0 million in 2011. The 2013 increase was influenced by greater personnel costs. The 2012 decrease reflected lower expenses related to previously idled held-for-sale real estate.

discontinued operations.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Liquidity and Capital Resources

In order

We maintain sufficient flexibility in our capital structure to ensure that our capitalization is adequate to support our future internal growth prospects, acquire food businesses consistent with our strategic goals, and maintain cash returns to our shareholders through cash dividends and share repurchases, we will need to maintain sufficient flexibility in our future capital structure.repurchases. Our balance sheet retainedmaintained fundamental financial strength during 2013, and2016 as we ended the year with approximately $123$118 million in cash and equivalents, along with shareholders’ equity of approximately $501$514 million and no debt.

Under our unsecured revolving credit facility (“Facility”), we may borrow up to a maximum of $120$150 million at any one time. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. We had no borrowings outstanding under this facilitythe Facility at June 30, 2013.2016. At June 30, 2013,2016, we had approximately $3.4$4.7 million of standby letters of credit outstanding, which reduced the amount available for borrowing on the unsecured revolving credit facility.Facility. The facilityFacility expires in April 2017,2021, and all outstanding amounts are then due and payable. Interest is variable based upon formulas tied to LIBOR or an alternative base rate defined in the credit agreement,Facility, at our option. We must also pay facility fees that are tied to our then-applicable consolidated leverage ratio. Based onLoans may be used for general corporate purposes. Due to the long-term nature of this facility,its terms, when we have outstanding borrowings under this facility, wethe Facility, they will classify the outstanding balancebe classified as long-term debt.

The facilityFacility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness, asset sales and acquisitions, and financial covenants relating to interest coverage and leverage. At June 30, 2013,2016, we were in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of the facility,Facility, and we exceeded the requirements of the financial covenants by substantial margins.

At June 30, 2016, we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under the Facility.

We currently expect to remain in compliance with the facility’sFacility’s covenants for the foreseeable future. AHowever, a default under the facilityFacility could accelerate the repayment of any outstanding indebtedness and limit our access to $75 million of additional credit available under the facility.Facility. Such an event could require a reduction in or curtailment of cash dividends or share repurchases, reduce or delay beneficial expansion or investment plans, or otherwise impact our ability to meet our obligations when due. At June 30, 2013, we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under the facility.


We believe that internally generated fundscash provided by operating activities and our existing balances in cash and equivalents, in addition to our currentlythat available bank credit arrangements,under the Facility, should be adequate to meet our cash requirements through 2014.2017. If we were to borrow outside of our credit facilitythe Facility under current market terms, our average interest rate may increase significantly and have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

For additional information regarding our credit facility, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.

Cash Flows

    Year Ended June 30,  Change 

(Dollars in thousands)

  2013  2012  2011  2013 vs. 2012  2012 vs. 2011 

Provided by Operating Activities

  $131,682  $122,447  $147,454  $9,235   8 $(25,007  (17)% 

Used in Investing Activities

  $(22,378 $(16,599 $(35,758 $(5,779  (35)%  $19,159   54

Used in Financing Activities

  $(177,554 $(46,478 $(80,320 $(131,076  (282)%  $33,842   42

Our cash flows for the years 2011 through 2013 are presented in the Consolidated Statements of

  
Year Ended June 30, Change
(Dollars in thousands)2016 2015 2014 2016 vs. 2015 2015 vs. 2014
Provided By Operating Activities$142,585
 $132,772
 $129,091
 $9,813
 7% $3,681
 3 %
(Used In) Provided By Investing Activities$(17,423) $(112,325) $8,475
 $94,902
 84% $(120,800) N/M
Used In Financing Activities$(189,284) $(49,784) $(49,412) $(139,500) N/M
 $(372) (1)%
Cash Flows. Cash flow generated from operationsprovided by operating activities remains the primary source of financing for our internal growth.
Cash provided by operating activities in 20132016 totaled approximately $131.7$142.6 million, an increase of 8%7% as compared with the prior-year2015 total of $122.4$132.8 million, which decreasedincreased 3% from the 20112014 total of $147.5$129.1 million. The 20132016 increase was due to an increase in net income and depreciation and amortization as partially offset by higher working capital requirements. In general, the increased levels of working capital requirements reflect higher sales volumes and the impact of our Flatout acquisition. Additionally, the changes in other current assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities reflect the timing of estimated tax payments and the favorable tax impact of the loss on sale of discontinued operations in prior years. The increase in depreciation and amortization reflects the amortization of intangibles relating to the Flatout acquisition and the related depreciation on its acquired fixed assets, as well as additional depreciation on recent capital expenditures. The 2015 increase in cash provided by operating activities resultedwas largely influenced by the discontinued operations resulting from higher net income. The 2012 decrease reflected relative changesthe sale of our candle manufacturing and marketing operations, which were sold in working capital, particularly accounts receivable, as well as lower net income.

January 2014. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further information regarding this sale.

Cash used in investing activities totaled approximately $22.4$17.4 million in 2013, $16.62016 as compared to a use of $112.3 million in 20122015 and $35.8a source of $8.5 million in 2011.2014. The 20132016 decrease in cash used in investing activities reflects the $92.2 million paid for the acquisition of Flatout in March 2015, as well as a planned lower level of capital expenditures in 2016. The 2015 increase in cash used in investing activities reflectedreflects cash paid for the 2015 acquisition of Flatout, proceeds from the sale of our candle manufacturing and marketing operations in 2014 and a higher level of capital expenditures in 2013, includingcompared to 2014. Our 2015 capital expenditures for expanded crouton manufacturing capacity. The 2012 decrease reflectedincluded a lower level of capital expenditures.processing capacity expansion project at our Horse Cave, Kentucky dressing facility which was essentially complete at December 31, 2014. Capital expenditures totaled approximately $24.1$16.7 million in 2013,2016, compared to $16.3$18.3 million in 20122015 and $35.3$16.0 million in 2011. Capital spending allocations during 2013 by segment approximated 97% for Specialty Foods and 3% for Glassware and Candles.2014. Based on our current plans and expectations, we believe that our total capital expenditures for 20142017 could total $25 million, and perhaps more depending on the timing and approval of certain food-related projects currently being evaluated.

approximately $20 to $22 million.

Financing activities used net cash totaling approximately $177.6$189.3 million, $46.5$49.8 million and $80.3$49.4 million in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. The 2013 increasehigher level in cash used in financing activities2016 was due to higher dividend payments, including the $5.00 per share special dividend that was paid in December 2012, as partially offset by a lower level of share repurchases.2015. The 2012 decrease was duespecial dividend payment, which totaled $136.7 million, led to a lower level of share repurchases, as partially offset by an increasethe decline in dividend payments. The total payment for cash dividends for the year endedretained earnings since June 30, 2013 was approximately $178.1 million.2015 and also resulted in the decrease of Corporate assets from that presented in the business segment information disclosed in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The dividend payout rate for 20132016 was $1.52$1.96 per share, excluding the special dividend, as compared to $1.41 per share during 2012 and $1.29$1.82 per share in 2011.2015 and $1.72 per share in 2014. This past fiscal year marked the 50th53rd consecutive year in which our dividend rate was increased. Cash utilized for share repurchases totaled approximately$0.2 million, $0.6 million $8.3 million and $43.1$3.1 million in 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization of 2,000,000 shares in November 2010. Approximately 1,468,000At June 30, 2016, 1,418,152 shares from this authorization remained authorized for future purchase at June 30, 2013.

purchase.

The future levels of share repurchases and declared dividends are subject to the periodic review of our Board of Directors and are generally determined after an assessment is made of various factors, such factors as anticipated earnings levels, cash flow requirements and general business conditions.

Our ongoing business activities continue to be subject to compliance with various laws, rules and regulations as may be issued and enforced by various Federal,federal, state and local agencies. With respect to environmental matters, costs are incurred pertaining to regulatory compliance and, upon occasion, remediation. Such costs have not been, and are not anticipated to become, material.

We are contingently liable with respect to lawsuits, taxes and various other matters that routinely arise in the normal course of business. We do not have any related party transactions that materially affect our results of operations, cash flowflows or financial condition.


OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS, CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS

We do not have off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “Variable Interest Entities,” that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.

We have various contractual obligations that are appropriately recorded as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Certain other items, such as purchase obligations, are not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Examples of items not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements are commitments to purchase raw materials or packaging inventory that has not yet been received as of June 30, 20132016 and future minimum lease payments for the use of property and equipment under operating lease agreements.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of June 30, 20132016 (dollars in thousands):

   Payment Due by Period 

Contractual Obligations

 Total  Less than 1
Year
  1-3 Years  3-5 Years  More than 5
Years
 

Operating Lease Obligations (1)

 $13,215  $4,764  $5,158  $2,142  $1,151 

Purchase Obligations (2)

  115,269   108,964   4,988   981   336 

Other Noncurrent Liabilities (as reflected on Consolidated Balance Sheet (3)

  1,685   —      1,685   —      —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $130,169  $113,728  $11,831  $3,123  $1,487 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Payment Due by Period
Contractual ObligationsTotal Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than 5 Years
Operating Lease Obligations (1)$23,303
 $4,810
 $8,614
 $4,090
 $5,789
Purchase Obligations (2)148,434
 138,456
 9,654
 324
 
Other Noncurrent Liabilities (as reflected on Consolidated Balance Sheet) (3)681
 
 681
 
 
Total$172,418
 $143,266
 $18,949
 $4,414
 $5,789
(1)Operating leases are primarily entered into for warehouse and office facilities and certain equipment. See Note 105 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
(2)Purchase obligations represent purchase orders and longer-term purchase arrangements related to the procurement of raw materials, supplies, services, and property, plant and equipment.
(3)This amount does not include approximately $21.6$26.0 million of other noncurrent liabilities recorded on the balance sheet, which consist of the underfunded pension liability, other post employment benefit obligations, tax liabilities, noncurrent workers compensation obligations, deferred compensation and interest on deferred compensation. These items are excluded, as it is not certain when these liabilities will become due. See Notes 5, 7, 89, 12, 13 and 914 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.

IMPACT OF INFLATION

In recent years,

Our business results can be influenced by significant changes in the costs of our raw materials. We attempt to mitigate the impact of inflation on our raw materials by entering into longer-term fixed-price contracts for a portion of our most significant commodities, soybean oil and flour. However, we have beenremain exposed to significant fluctuationsevents and trends in certain manufacturing input costs, including materials such as food commoditiesthe marketplace for our other raw-material and paraffin wax. In 2013, these fluctuations were not as significant, butpackaging costs. While we attempt to pass through sustained increases in 2012, we experienced comparatively higher costs for a wide variety of raw materials (especially for soybean oil, flour and paraffin wax) and in 2011, we experienced comparatively higher ingredient costs (including for soybean oil, dairy products, sugar, eggs and paraffin wax). We estimate that higher material costs adversely affectedvia price adjustments on our 2012retail and 2011 results by approximately 4%foodservice products, such price adjustments will often lag the changes in the related input costs.
For 2015 and 3%2014, the net impact of net sales, respectively. We also experienced higher distribution costsinflation was not significant. As we transitioned from 2015 to 2016 we saw a significant increase in 2012, which were,the price of egg-based ingredients due to a significant outbreak of avian influenza in part, influenced by higher diesel costs. Entering 2014, under current market conditions, we foresee a modestly favorable material costs comparison.

Over the courseUnited States. As noted above, due to timing and the degree of 2012 and 2011, we were generally able to adjust various selling prices of food products to partially offset the effects of increased raw-material costs. However, these adjustments generally lagged the increase in egg costs, we lagged obtaining cost recovery during the first half of 2016, but we had largely recovered such costs as we exited our costs, havingthird fiscal quarter. As we enter 2017, we expect to see a deflationary pricing environment within our foodservice channel as the cost of eggs has retreated to historical prices, and we have adjusted pricing charged to our foodservice customers to reflect the lower input cost of eggs and other key ingredients. Consequently, while the deflationary pricing is expected to have minimal impact to our gross profit during this period, we expect this deflationary pricing action to negatively impact our net negative impact onsales growth from our 2012foodservice channel during the first half of fiscal 2017.

We are also exposed to the impacts of general inflation, especially in the areas of annual wage adjustments and 2011 operating margins.

We alsobenefit costs. Over time, we attempt to minimize the exposure to increased costssuch cost increases through our ongoing efforts to achieve greater manufacturing and distribution efficiencies, through the improvement of work processes.

processes and strategic investments in plant equipment.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

This MD&A discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including, but not limited to, those related to accounts receivable inventories, marketing andallowances, distribution costs, asset impairments and self-insurance reserves. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Historically, the aggregate differences, if any, between our estimates and actual amounts in any year have typically not had a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements. While a summary of our significant accounting policies can be found in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, we believe the following critical accounting policies among others, affect ourreflect those areas in which more significant judgments and estimates are used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue upon transfer of title and risk of loss, provided that evidence of an arrangement exists, pricing is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. Net sales are recorded net of estimated sales discounts, returns, trade promotions and certain other sales incentives, including couponscoupon redemptions and rebates.

Receivables and Related Allowances
We evaluate the Allowanceadequacy of our allowances for Doubtful Accounts

customer deductions considering several factors including historical experience, specific trade programs and existing customer relationships. We also provide an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the aging of accounts receivable balances, historical write-off experience and on-going reviews of our trade receivables. Measurement of potential losses requires credit review of existing customer relationships, consideration of historical loss experience, including the need to adjust for current conditions, and judgments about the probable effects of relevant observable data, including present economic conditions such as delinquency rates and the economic health of customers. In addition to credit concerns, we also evaluate the adequacy of our allowances for customer deductions considering several factors including historical losses and existing customer relationships.

Valuation of Inventory

When necessary, we provide allowances to adjust the carrying value of our inventory to the lower of cost or net realizable value, including any costs to sell or dispose. The determination of whether inventory items are slow moving, obsolete or in excess of needs requires estimates about the future demand for our products. The estimates as to future demand used in the valuation of inventory are subject to the ongoing success of our products and may differ from actual due to such factors as changes in customer and consumer demand. A decrease in product demand due to changing customer tastes, consumer buying patterns or loss of shelf space to competitors could significantly impact our evaluation of our excess and obsolete inventories.

Long-Lived Assets

We monitor the recoverability of the carrying value of our long-lived assets by periodically considering whether indicators of impairment are present. If such indicators are present, we determine if the assets are recoverable by comparing the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows to the assets’ carrying amounts. Our cash flows are based on historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market and operating conditions. If the carrying amounts are greater, then the assets are not recoverable. In that instance, we compare the carrying amounts to the fair value to determine the amount of the impairment to be recorded.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill is not amortized. It is evaluated annually at April 30, through assetby applying impairment testing procedures, as appropriate. IntangibleOther intangible assets with lives restricted by contractual, legal, or other means are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.lives to Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. We periodically evaluate the future economic benefit of the recorded goodwill and other intangible assets when events or circumstances indicate potential recoverability concerns. Carrying amounts are adjusted appropriately when determined to have been impaired.

Accrued Marketing and Distribution

Various marketing programs are offered to customers to reimburse them for a portion or all of their promotional activities related to our products. Additionally, we often

We incur various freight and other related costs associated with shipping products to the customer.our customers and warehouses. We provide accruals for the costs of marketingunbilled shipments from carriers utilizing historical or projected freight rates and distribution based on historical information as may be modified by estimates of actual costs incurred. Actual costs may differ significantly if factors such as the level and success of the customers’ programs, changes in customer utilization practices, or other conditions differ from expectations.

relevant information.

Accruals for Self-Insurance

Self-insurance accruals are made for certain claims associated with employee health care, workers’ compensation and general liability insurance. These accruals include estimates that may beare primarily based on historical loss development factors. Differences in estimates
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Recent accounting pronouncements and assumptions could result in an accrual requirement materially different from the calculated accrual.

Accounting for Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

To determine our ultimate obligation under our defined benefit pension plans and our other postretirement benefit plans, we must estimate the future cost of benefits and attribute that cost to the time period during which each covered employee works. To record the related net assets and obligation of such benefit plans, we use assumptions related to inflation, investment returns, mortality, employee turnover, medical costs and discount rates. To determine the discount rate, we, along with our third-party actuaries, considered several factors, including the June 30, 2013 rates of various bond indices, such as the Moody’s Aa long-term bond index, yield curve analysis results from our actuaries based on expected cash flows of our plans, and the past history of discount rates used for the plan valuation. We, along with our third-party actuaries, review all of these assumptions on an ongoing basis to ensure that the most reasonable information available is being considered. Changes in assumptions and future investment returns could potentially have a material impact on pension expense and related funding requirements. We recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our defined benefit plans as an asset or liability in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Any changes in that funded status caused by subsequent plan revaluations are recognized through comprehensive income. We may also experience future plan settlements or curtailments having unanticipated effects on operating results.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-02,“Comprehensive Income: Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 13-02”) which adds new disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU 13-02 effectively replaces the requirements previously outlined in ASU No. 2011-05,“Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 11-05”) and ASU No. 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income: Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05” (“ASU 11-12”). The requirements of ASU 13-02 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. As ASU 13-02 relates to disclosure requirements only, we do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have an impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 11-12. This ASU indefinitely deferred the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income as set forth in

ASU 11-05. ASU 11-12 had the same effective date as the unaffected provisions of ASU 11-05, for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. As this update is merely a deferral, it had no impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 11-05. This ASU amended comprehensive income guidance to eliminate the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity. Instead, it requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 11-05 was effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. As noted above, portions of this ASU relating to reclassifications were indefinitely deferred with the issuance of ASU 11-12. We adopted the presentation provisions of this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 by presenting other comprehensive income and its components in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. There was no impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other: Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 11-08”). This ASU permitted an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying value. ASU 11-08 was effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. We chose not to use the qualitative approach for our annual goodwill review in fiscal 2013 and there was notheir impact on our consolidated financial statements are disclosed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.

Forward-Looking Statements

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”). This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the PSLRA and other applicable securities laws. Such statements can be identified by the use of the forward-looking words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “expect,” “hope” or similar words. These statements discuss future expectations; contain projections regarding future developments, operations or financial conditions; or state other

forward-looking information. Such statements are based upon assumptions and assessments made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe to be appropriate. These forward-looking statements involve various important risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ as a result of factors over which we have no, or limited, control including, without limitation, the specific influences outlined below. Management believes these forward-looking statements to be reasonable; however, youone should not place undue reliance on such statements that are based on current expectations. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements, except as required by law.

Items which could impact these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

to, those risk factors identified in Item 1A and:


price and product competition;
the impact of any regulatory matters affecting our food business, including any required labeling changes and their impact on consumer demand;
the potential for loss of larger programs or key customer relationships;

fluctuations in the effectcost and availability of consolidation of customers within key market channels;

the successingredients and cost of new product development efforts;

packaging;

the lack of market acceptance of new products;

the reaction of customers or consumers to the effect of price increases we may implement;

the effect of consolidation of customers within key market channels;

the success and cost of new product development efforts;
the lack of market acceptance of new products;
the possible occurrence of product recalls or other defective or mislabeled product costs;
changes in demand for our products, which may result from loss of brand reputation or customer goodwill;

the extentmaintenance of competitive position with respect to which future business acquisitions are completed and acceptably integrated;

the possible occurrence of product recalls or other defective or mislabeled product costs;

manufacturers;

efficiencies in plant operations, including the ability to optimize overhead utilization in candle operations;

price and product competition;

the uncertainty regarding the effect or outcome of any decision to explore further strategic alternatives among our nonfood operations;

fluctuations in the cost and availability of raw materials;

adverse changes in freight, energy costs andor other factors that may affect costs of producing, distributing or transporting our products;

capacity constraints that may affect our ability to meet demand or may increase our costs;

dependence on contract manufacturers;
efficiencies in plant operations;
stability of labor relations, including the impact of our current contract negotiations with a collective bargaining unit;
the outcome of any litigation or arbitration;
the impact of fluctuations in our pension plan asset values on funding levels, contributions required and benefit costs;

maintenance of competitive position with respectthe extent to other manufacturers, including global sources of production;

which future business acquisitions are completed and acceptably integrated;

dependence on key personnel;

stability of labor relations;

dependence on contract copackerspersonnel and limited or exclusive sources for certain goods;

changes in key personnel;

legislation and litigation affecting the future administration of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000;

access to any required financing;

changes in estimates in critical accounting judgments;

and

the outcome of any litigation or arbitration; and

certain other factors.

risk factors, including those discussed in other filings we have submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We have exposure to market risks primarily from changes in raw material prices. In recent years, due to the absence of any borrowings, we have not had exposure to changes in interest rates and ingredient prices.rates. We also have not had exposure to market risk associated with derivative financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments.

INTEREST RATE RISK

We are subject to interest rate risk primarily associated with any borrowings we may have outstanding. Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in interest rates could adversely affect earnings and cash flows. Rates under our credit facility are set at the time of each borrowing and are based on predetermined formulas connected to certain benchmark rates. Increases in these rates could have an adverse impact on our earnings and cash flows. At the end of 2013, we had no borrowings outstanding under our credit facility. The nature and amount of our borrowings may vary as a result of business requirements, acquisitions, market conditions and other factors.

COMMODITY

RAW MATERIAL PRICE RISK

We purchase a variety of commodities and other raw materials, such as soybean oil, flour, waxeggs and packagingdairy-based materials, which we use to manufacture our products. The market prices for these commodities are subject to fluctuation based upon a number of economic factors and may become volatile at times. A recent example of such volatility occurred as we transitioned from 2015 to 2016 and the price of egg-based ingredients increased suddenly and dramatically due to a significant outbreak of avian influenza in the United States which sharply curtailed supply. While we do not use any derivative commodity instruments to hedge against commodity price risk, we do actively manage a portion of the risk through a structured forward purchasing program for certain future requirements.key materials such as soybean oil and flour. This program gives us more predictable input costs, which may help stabilize our short-term margins during periods of volatility in commodity markets.

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Lancaster Colony Corporation

Columbus, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lancaster Colony Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2013.2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the table of contents at Item 15. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2013,2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.


We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013,2016, based on the criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated August 29, 2013,24, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio

August 29, 2013

24, 2016



LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

    June 30, 

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

  2013  2012 
ASSETS  

Current Assets:

   

Cash and equivalents

  $123,386   $191,636  

Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts, 2013-$822; 2012-$678)

   70,398    73,326  

Inventories:

   

Raw materials

   35,012    36,005  

Finished goods and work in process

   74,139    73,699  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total inventories

   109,151    109,704  

Deferred income taxes and other current assets

   23,123    17,073  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   326,058    391,739  

Property, Plant and Equipment:

   

Land, buildings and improvements

   144,206    140,337  

Machinery and equipment

   289,051    276,951  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total cost

   433,257    417,288  

Less accumulated depreciation

   243,562    233,158  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment-net

   189,695    184,130  

Other Assets:

   

Goodwill

   89,840    89,840  

Other intangible assets-net

   6,322    7,267  

Other noncurrent assets

   8,049    9,659  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $619,964   $682,635  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY  

Current Liabilities:

   

Accounts payable

  $41,890   $40,708  

Accrued liabilities

   35,287    31,963  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   77,177    72,671  

Other Noncurrent Liabilities

   23,291    31,627  

Deferred Income Taxes

   18,274    14,070  

Shareholders’ Equity:

   

Preferred stock-authorized 3,050,000 shares; outstanding-none

   

Common stock-authorized 75,000,000 shares; outstanding - 2013-27,323,721 shares; 2012-27,286,861 shares

   102,622    100,015  

Retained earnings

   1,139,213    1,208,027  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (8,391  (12,162

Common stock in treasury, at cost

   (732,222  (731,613
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   501,222    564,267  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $619,964   $682,635  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  
June 30,
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)2016 2015
ASSETS
Current Assets:   
Cash and equivalents$118,080
 $182,202
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts, 2016-$125; 2015-$206)66,006
 62,437
Inventories:   
Raw materials26,153
 30,655
Finished goods49,944
 47,244
Total inventories76,097
 77,899
Other current assets7,644
 7,672
Total current assets267,827
 330,210
Property, Plant and Equipment:   
Land, buildings and improvements116,858
 113,844
Machinery and equipment263,336
 253,143
Total cost380,194
 366,987
Less accumulated depreciation210,599
 194,676
Property, plant and equipment-net169,595
 172,311
Other Assets:   
Goodwill143,788
 143,788
Other intangible assets-net44,866
 47,771
Other noncurrent assets8,656
 8,076
Total$634,732
 $702,156
    
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:   
Accounts payable$39,931
 $38,823
Accrued liabilities33,072
 35,821
Total current liabilities73,003
 74,644
Other Noncurrent Liabilities26,698
 23,654
Deferred Income Taxes21,433
 22,940
Commitments and Contingencies
 
Shareholders’ Equity:   
Preferred stock-authorized 3,050,000 shares; outstanding-none
 
Common stock-authorized 75,000,000 shares; outstanding-2016-27,423,550 shares; 2015-27,360,581 shares110,677
 107,767
Retained earnings1,150,337
 1,219,119
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(11,350) (10,057)
Common stock in treasury, at cost(736,066) (735,911)
Total shareholders’ equity513,598
 580,918
Total$634,732
 $702,156
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

    Years Ended June 30, 

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

  2013  2012   2011 

Net Sales

  $1,165,909   $1,131,359    $1,089,946  

Cost of Sales

   898,800    891,248     847,517  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross Margin

   267,109    240,111     242,429  

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

   105,203    96,824     95,425  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating Income

   161,906    143,287     147,004  

Other Income:

     

Other income-Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act

   293    2,701     14,388  

Interest income and other-net

   (216  43     114  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income Before Income Taxes

   161,983    146,031     161,506  

Taxes Based on Income

   52,734    50,223     55,142  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Income

  $109,249   $95,808    $106,364  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Income Per Common Share:

     

Basic

  $4.00   $3.51    $3.84  

Diluted

  $3.99   $3.51    $3.84  

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:

     

Basic

   27,252    27,233     27,664  

Diluted

   27,285    27,265     27,689  

  
Years Ended June 30,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)2016 2015 2014
Net Sales$1,191,109
 $1,104,514
 $1,041,075
Cost of Sales891,480
 846,822
 792,507
Gross Profit299,629
 257,692
 248,568
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses115,059
 102,831
 94,801
Operating Income184,570
 154,861
 153,767
Other, Net63
 (309) (488)
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes184,633
 154,552
 153,279
Taxes Based on Income62,869
 52,866
 52,293
Income From Continuing Operations121,764
 101,686
 100,986
Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax:     
Income from discontinued operations
 
 3,058
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
 
 (29,058)
Total discontinued operations
 
 (26,000)
Net Income$121,764
 $101,686
 $74,986
Income Per Common Share From Continuing Operations:     
Basic$4.45
 $3.72
 $3.70
Diluted$4.44
 $3.72
 $3.69
Loss Per Common Share From Discontinued Operations:     
Basic and diluted$
 $
 $(0.95)
Net Income Per Common Share:     
Basic$4.45
 $3.72
 $2.75
Diluted$4.44
 $3.72
 $2.74
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:     
Basic27,336
 27,300
 27,264
Diluted27,373
 27,327
 27,308
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

    Years Ended June 30, 

(Amounts in thousands)

  2013  2012  2011 

Net Income

  $109,249   $95,808   $106,364  

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):

    

Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans:

    

Net gain (loss) arising during the period, before tax

   5,322    (8,437  4,036  

Amortization of loss, before tax

   665    324    500  

Amortization of transition asset, before tax

   (1  (1  (1

Amortization of prior service asset, before tax

   (5  (5  (5
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax

   5,981    (8,119  4,530  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Tax Attributes of Items in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):

    

Net gain (loss) arising during the period, tax

   (1,965  3,118    (1,590

Amortization of loss, tax

   (247  (120  (188

Amortization of transition asset, tax

   —      —      —    

Amortization of prior service asset, tax

   2    2    2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Tax (Expense) Benefit

   (2,210  3,000    (1,776
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax

   3,771    (5,119  2,754  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive Income

  $113,020   $90,689   $109,118  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  
Years Ended June 30,
(Amounts in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Net Income$121,764
 $101,686
 $74,986
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income:     
Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans:     
Net (loss) gain arising during the period, before tax(4,200) (3,563) 96
Prior service credit arising during the period, before tax1,770
 
 
Amortization of loss, before tax505
 401
 433
Amortization of prior service credit, before tax(126) (5) (5)
Total Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Before Tax(2,051) (3,167) 524
Tax Attributes of Items in Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income:     
Net (loss) gain arising during the period, tax1,551
 1,318
 (36)
Prior service credit arising during the period, tax(654) 
 
Amortization of loss, tax(186) (149) (160)
Amortization of prior service credit, tax47
 2
 2
Total Tax Benefit (Expense)758
 1,171
 (194)
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Net of Tax(1,293) (1,996) 330
Comprehensive Income$120,471
 $99,690
 $75,316
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

    Years Ended June 30, 

(Amounts in thousands)

  2013  2012  2011 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:

    

Net income

  $109,249   $95,808   $106,364  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   20,114    20,266    18,940  

Deferred income taxes and other noncash changes

   1,278    5,147    8,680  

Stock-based compensation expense

   2,901    2,922    2,297  

Loss (gain) on sale of property

   753    (92  14  

Pension plan activity

   (61  (1,122  (1,326

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Receivables

   1,522    (8,763  3,615  

Inventories

   (1,321  2,181    9,624  

Other current assets

   (5,647  5,536    317  

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

   2,894    564    (1,071
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   131,682    122,447    147,454  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:

    

Payments on property additions

   (24,147  (16,347  (35,343

Proceeds from sale of property

   2,836    895    19  

Other-net

   (1,067  (1,147  (434
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (22,378  (16,599  (35,758
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:

    

Purchase of treasury stock

   (609  (8,315  (43,103

Payment of dividends

   (178,063  (38,464  (35,696

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

   794    301    479  

Increase (decrease) in cash overdraft balance

   324    —      (2,000
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (177,554  (46,478  (80,320
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net change in cash and equivalents

   (68,250  59,370    31,376  

Cash and equivalents at beginning of year

   191,636    132,266    100,890  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and equivalents at end of year

  $123,386   $191,636   $132,266  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  
Years Ended June 30,
(Amounts in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:     
Net income$121,764
 $101,686
 $74,986
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization24,147
 21,111
 20,407
Deferred income taxes and other noncash changes(525) 306
 2,720
Stock-based compensation expense3,326
 3,040
 2,472
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation(1,417) (563) (1,020)
Gain on sale of property
 
 (6)
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
 
 44,033
Pension plan activity(296) (591) (243)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:     
Receivables(3,547) (1,900) (6,881)
Inventories1,802
 366
 1,122
Other current assets1,445
 5,229
 (1,147)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(4,114) 4,088
 (7,352)
Net cash provided by operating activities142,585
 132,772
 129,091
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:     
Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired(12) (92,217) 
Payments for property additions(16,671) (18,298) (15,961)
Proceeds from sale of property
 
 6
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations
 
 25,610
Other-net(740) (1,810) (1,180)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(17,423) (112,325) 8,475
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:     
Purchase of treasury stock(155) (569) (3,120)
Payment of dividends (including special dividend payment, 2016-$136,677; 2015-$0; 2014-$0)(190,546) (49,778) (46,988)
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation1,417
 563
 1,020
Decrease in cash overdraft balance
 
 (324)
Net cash used in financing activities(189,284) (49,784) (49,412)
Net change in cash and equivalents(64,122) (29,337) 88,154
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year182,202
 211,539
 123,385
Cash and equivalents at end of year$118,080
 $182,202
 $211,539
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Amounts in thousands,

except per share data)

 Common Stock
Outstanding
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
  Treasury
Stock
  Total
Shareholders’
Equity
 
 Shares  Amount             

Balance, June 30, 2010

  28,168  $94,885  $1,080,015  $(9,797 $(680,195 $484,908 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

    106,364     106,364 

Net pension and postretirement benefit gains, net of $1,776 tax effect

     2,754    2,754 

Cash dividends - common stock ($1.29 per share)

    (35,696    (35,696

Purchase of treasury stock

  (810     (43,103  (43,103

Stock-based plans, including excess tax benefits

  28   (4     (4

Stock-based compensation expense

   2,316      2,316 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2011

  27,386   97,197   1,150,683   (7,043  (723,298  517,539 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

    95,808     95,808 

Net pension and postretirement benefit losses, net of ($3,000) tax effect

     (5,119   (5,119

Cash dividends - common stock ($1.41 per share)

    (38,464    (38,464

Purchase of treasury stock

  (143     (8,315  (8,315

Stock-based plans, including excess tax benefits

  44   (104     (104

Stock-based compensation expense

   2,922      2,922 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2012

  27,287   100,015   1,208,027   (12,162  (731,613  564,267 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

    109,249     109,249 

Net pension and postretirement benefit gains, net of $2,210 tax effect

     3,771    3,771 

Cash dividends - common stock ($6.52 per share)

    (178,063    (178,063

Purchase of treasury stock

  (8     (609  (609

Stock-based plans, including excess tax benefits

  45   (294     (294

Stock-based compensation expense

   2,901      2,901 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2013

  27,324  $102,622  $1,139,213  $(8,391 $(732,222 $501,222 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Amounts in thousands,
except per share data)
 
Common Stock
Outstanding
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Treasury
Stock
 
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
 Shares Amount        
Balance, June 30, 2013 27,324
 $102,622
 $1,139,213
 $(8,391) $(732,222) $501,222
Net income     74,986
     74,986
Net pension and postretirement benefit gains, net of $194 tax effect       330
   330
Cash dividends - common stock ($1.72 per share)     (46,988)     (46,988)
Purchase of treasury stock (42)       (3,120) (3,120)
Stock-based plans, including excess tax benefits 57
 (305)       (305)
Stock-based compensation expense   2,472
       2,472
Balance, June 30, 2014 27,339
 104,789
 1,167,211
 (8,061) (735,342) 528,597
Net income     101,686
     101,686
Net pension and postretirement benefit losses, net of ($1,171) tax effect       (1,996)   (1,996)
Cash dividends - common stock ($1.82 per share)     (49,778)     (49,778)
Purchase of treasury stock (6)       (569) (569)
Stock-based plans, including excess tax benefits 28
 (62)       (62)
Stock-based compensation expense   3,040
       3,040
Balance, June 30, 2015 27,361
 107,767
 1,219,119
 (10,057) (735,911) 580,918
Net income     121,764
     121,764
Net pension and postretirement benefit losses, net of ($758) tax effect       (1,293)   (1,293)
Cash dividends - common stock ($6.96 per share)     (190,546)     (190,546)
Purchase of treasury stock (2)       (155) (155)
Stock-based plans, including excess tax benefits 65
 (416)       (416)
Stock-based compensation expense   3,326
       3,326
Balance, June 30, 2016 27,424
 $110,677
 $1,150,337
 $(11,350) $(736,066) $513,598
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lancaster Colony Corporation and our wholly-owned subsidiaries, collectively referred to as “we,” “us,” “our,” “registrant,” or the “Company.” Intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. Our fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. Unless otherwise noted, references to “year” pertain to our fiscal year; for example, 20132016 refers to fiscal 2013,2016, which is the period from July 1, 20122015 to June 30, 2013.

2016.

Discontinued Operations
On January 30, 2014, we sold effectively all of the net operating assets of our candle manufacturing and marketing operations. The financial results of these operations for 2014 are reported as discontinued operations. See further discussion and disclosure about discontinued operations in Note 3.
Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant estimates included in these consolidated financial statements include allowanceallowances for doubtful accounts receivable,customer deductions, net realizable value of inventories, useful lives for the calculation of depreciation and amortization, impairments of long-lived assets,distribution accruals, for marketing and merchandising programs, tax contingency reserves for uncertain tax positions, pension and postretirement assumptions as well as expenses related to distribution and self-insurance accruals. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Cash and Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of our cash and equivalents, including money market funds and commercial paper, approximate fair value due to their short maturities and are considered level 1 investments, which have quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets. As a result of our cash management system, checks issued but not presented to the banks for payment may create negative book cash balances. When such negative balances exist, they are included in other accrued liabilities. These June 30 balances were as follows:

   2013   2012 

Negative book cash balances reclassed to other accrued liabilities

  $324    $—    

Accrued Liabilities.

Receivables and Related Allowances
We evaluate the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The carrying amountsadequacy of our accounts receivable approximate fair value.allowances for customer deductions considering several factors including historical experience, specific trade programs and existing customer relationships. We also provide an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the aging of accounts receivable balances, historical write-off experience and on-going reviews of our trade receivables. Measurement of potential losses requires credit review of existing customer relationships, consideration of historical loss experience, including the need to adjust for current conditions, and judgments about the probable effects of relevant observable data, including present economic conditions such as delinquency rates and the economic health of customers.

Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and equivalents and trade accounts receivable. By policy, we limit the amount of credit exposure to any one institution or issuer. Our concentration of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable is mitigated by our credit evaluation process and by having a large and diverse customer base. However, see Note 1210 with respect to our accounts receivable with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

and McLane Company, Inc., a wholesale distribution subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESInventories

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market and are costed by various methods that approximate actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis. It is not practicableDue to segregatethe nature of our business, work in process inventory is not a material component of inventory. When necessary, we provide allowances to adjust the carrying value of our inventory to the lower of cost or net realizable value, including any costs to sell or dispose. The determination of whether inventory items are slow moving, obsolete or in excess of needs requires estimates about the future demand for our products. The estimates as to future demand used in the valuation of inventory are subject to the ongoing success of our products and may differ from finished goods inventories. We estimated that workactual due to factors such as changes in process inventories as a percentagecustomer and consumer demand.

30

Table of the combined total of finished goods and workContents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in process inventories at June 30 were as follows:

   2013  2012 

Work in process as a percentage of the combined total of finished goods and work in process

   4%   3

thousands, except per share data)



Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.depreciation, except for those acquired as part of a business combination, which are stated at fair value at the time of purchase. We use the straight-line method of computing depreciation for financial reporting purposes based on the estimated useful lives of the corresponding assets. Estimated useful lives for buildings and improvements range generally from two10 to 4540 years while machinery and equipment range generally from two3 to 2015 years. For tax purposes, we generally compute depreciation using accelerated methods.

Purchases of property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable and excluded from the property additions and the change in accounts payable in the Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows at June 30 were as follows:

   2013   2012   2011 

Construction in progress in accounts payable

  $346    $687    $45  

 2016 2015 2014
Construction in progress in accounts payable$1,000
 $189
 $2,755
The following table sets forth depreciation expense in each of the years endingended June 30:

   2013   2012   2011 

Depreciation expense

  $17,973    $17,767    $15,961  

 2016 2015 2014
Depreciation expense$20,114
 $18,867
 $17,419
Long-Lived Assets

We monitor the recoverability of the carrying value of our long-lived assets by periodically considering whether indicators of impairment are present. If such indicators are present, we determine if the assets are recoverable by comparing the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows to the assets’ carrying amounts. Our cash flows are based on historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate of future market and operating conditions. If the carrying amounts are greater, then the assets are not recoverable. In that instance, we compare the carrying amounts to the fair value to determine the amount of the impairment to be recorded.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill is not amortized. IntangibleIt is evaluated annually at April 30, by applying impairment testing procedures, as appropriate. Other intangible assets with lives restricted by contractual, legal, or other means are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives to generalSelling, General and administrative expense.Administrative Expenses. We periodically evaluate the future economic benefit of the recorded goodwill and other intangible assets when events or circumstances indicate potential recoverability concerns. Carrying amounts are adjusted appropriately when determined to have been impaired. As of April 30, 2013 and 2012 we completed our goodwill impairment testing, and have determined that our estimated fair value was substantially in excess of the related carrying value. See further discussion regarding goodwill and other intangible assets in Note 2.

7.

Accrued Marketing and Distribution

Various marketing programs are offered to customers to reimburse them for a portion or all of their promotional activities related to our products. Additionally, we often

We incur various freight and other related costs associated with shipping products to the customer.our customers and warehouses. We provide accruals for the costs of marketingunbilled shipments from carriers utilizing historical or projected freight rates and distribution based on

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

historical information as may be modified by estimates of actual costs incurred. Actual costs may differ significantly if factors such as the level and success of the customers’ programs, changes in customer utilization practices, or other conditions differ from expectations.

relevant information.

Accruals for Self-Insurance

Self-insurance accruals are made for certain claims associated with employee health care, workers’ compensation and general liability insurance. These accruals include estimates that are primarily based on historical loss development factors. Differences in estimates and assumptions could result in an accrual requirement materially different from the calculated accrual.

Shareholders’ Equity

We are authorized to issue 3,050,000 shares of preferred stock consisting of 750,000 shares of Class A Participating Preferred Stock with $1.00$1.00 par value, 1,150,000 shares of Class B Voting Preferred Stock without par value and 1,150,000 shares of Class C Nonvoting Preferred Stock without par value. Our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization of 2,000,000 shares in November 2010. Approximately 1,468,000At June 30, 2016, 1,418,152 shares remained authorized for future purchase at June 30, 2013.

purchase.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue upon transfer of title and risk of loss, provided that evidence of an arrangement exists, pricing is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. Net sales are recorded net of estimated sales discounts, returns, trade promotions and certain other sales incentives, including couponscoupon redemptions and rebates.


31

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Advertising Expense

We expense advertising as it is incurred. The following table summarizes advertising expense as a percentage of net sales in each of the years endingended June 30:

   2013  2012  2011 

Advertising expense as a percentage of net sales

   2%     2  2

Shipping and Handling

Shipping and handling

 2016 2015 2014
Advertising expense as a percentage of net sales3% 2% 2%
Distribution Costs
Distribution fees billed to customers are recorded as sales,included in Net Sales, while our shipping and handlingdistribution costs incurred are included in costCost of sales.

Sales.

Stock-Based Employee Compensation Plans

We account for our stock-based employee compensation plans in accordance with GAAP for stock-based compensation, which requires the measurement and recognition of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The cost of the employee services is recognized as compensation expense over the period that an employee provides service in exchange for the award, which is typically the vesting period. As our previous plan expired in May 2015, we obtained shareholder approval of a new plan at our November 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. See further discussion and disclosure in Note 6.

Other Income

During 2013, we received approximately $0.3 million from the U.S. government under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”) compared to $2.7 million received in 2012 and $14.4 million received in 2011. We recognize CDSOA-related income upon receiving notice from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security regarding its intent to remit a specific amount to us. These amounts were recorded as other income in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. See further discussion in Note 11.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Income Taxes

Our income tax expense, deferred tax assets and liabilities and reserves for unrecognized tax benefits reflect management’s best assessment of estimated future taxes to be paid. We are subject to income taxes in numerous domestic jurisdictions.

Our annual tax rate is determined based on our income, statutory tax rates and the permanent tax impacts of items treated differently for tax purposes than for financial reporting purposes. Tax law requires certain items be included in the tax return at different times than the items are reflected in the financial statements. Some of these differences are permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible in our tax return, and some differences are temporary, reversing over time, such as depreciation expense. These temporary differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Realization of certain deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income in the appropriate jurisdiction prior to the expiration of the carryforward periods. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized and thus we have not recorded any valuation allowance for the years ended June 30, 20132016 or 2012.

2015.

In accordance with accounting literature related to uncertainty in income taxes, tax benefits and liabilities from uncertain tax positions that are recognized in the financial statements are measured based on the largest benefitattribute that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

Changes in tax laws and rates could also affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. Management is not aware of any such changes that would have a material effect on our results of operations, cash flowflows or financial position. See further discussionsdiscussion in Note 5.

9.

Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents (restricted stock and stock-settled stock appreciation rights) outstanding during each period. Unvested shares of restricted stock granted to employees are considered participating securities since employees receive nonforfeitable dividends prior to vesting and, therefore, are included in the earnings allocation in computing EPS under the two-class method. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, which includes the dilutive potential common shares associated with nonparticipating restricted stock and stock-settled stock appreciation rights.

Basic and diluted net income per common share were calculated as follows:

   2013  2012  2011 

Net income

  $109,249   $95,808   $106,364  

Net income available to participating securities

   (326  (177  (146
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

  $108,923   $95,631   $106,218  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic

   27,252    27,233    27,664  

Incremental share effect from:

    

Nonparticipating restricted stock

   3    4    5  

Stock-settled stock appreciation rights

   30    28    20  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted

   27,285    27,265    27,689  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income per common share - basic

  $4.00   $3.51   $3.84  

Net income per common share - diluted

  $3.99   $3.51   $3.84  


32

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)



Basic and diluted income per common share from continuing operations were calculated as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Income from continuing operations$121,764
 $101,686
 $100,986
Income from continuing operations available to participating securities(242) (143) (174)
Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders$121,522
 $101,543
 $100,812
      
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic27,336
 27,300
 27,264
Incremental share effect from:     
Nonparticipating restricted stock3
 3
 3
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights34
 24
 41
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted27,373
 27,327
 27,308
      
Income per common share from continuing operations - basic$4.45
 $3.72
 $3.70
Income per common share from continuing operations - diluted$4.44
 $3.72
 $3.69
Comprehensive Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income includes changes in equity that result from transactions and economic events from non-owner sources. Comprehensive income is composed of two subsets – net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Included in other comprehensive income (loss) are pension and postretirement benefits adjustments.

The following table presents the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss by component:
 2016 2015
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at beginning of year$(10,057) $(8,061)
Defined Benefit Pension Plan Items:   
Net loss arising during the period(4,409) (3,408)
Amortization of unrecognized net loss (1)
539
 429
Postretirement Benefit Plan Items:   
Net gain (loss) arising during the period (2)
209
 (155)
Prior service credit arising during the period (2)
1,770
 
Amortization of unrecognized net gain (1)
(34) (28)
Amortization of prior service credit (1)
(126) (5)
Total other comprehensive loss, before tax(2,051) (3,167)
Total tax benefit758
 1,171
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax(1,293) (1,996)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of year$(11,350) $(10,057)
(1)Included in the computation of net periodic benefit income/cost. See Notes 12 and 13 for additional information.
(2)Includes a negative plan amendment and subsequent remeasurement. See Note 13 for additional information.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2013,July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-02,“Comprehensive Income: Reportingnew accounting guidance which requires entities to measure most inventory “at the lower of Amounts Reclassified Outcost or net realizable value,” thereby simplifying current guidance. Under current guidance an entity must measure inventory at the lower of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 13-02”)cost or market, where market is defined as one of three different measures, one of which addsis net realizable value. We will adopt this guidance on a prospective basis in fiscal 2017 including interim periods. We do not believe it will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued new disclosure requirementsaccounting guidance to simplify the accounting for items reclassified outstock-based compensation. The amendments include changes to the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU 13-02 effectively replacesawards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the requirements previously outlinedstatement of cash flows. The guidance will be effective for us in ASU No. 2011-05,“Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income” and ASU No. 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income: Deferralfiscal 2018 including interim periods. The transition method that will be applied on adoption varies for each of the Effective Dateamendments. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance.

33

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


In May 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance for Amendmentsthe recognition of revenue under the principle: “Recognize revenue to depict the Presentationtransfer of Reclassificationspromised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.” The guidance will be effective for us in fiscal 2019 including interim periods and will require either retrospective application to each prior period presented or retrospective application with the cumulative effect of Items Outinitially applying the standard recognized at the date of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Incomeadoption. The FASB issued subsequent clarifications of this new accounting guidance in 2016. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance.
In February 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance to require lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for leases with terms of more than 12 months. The updated guidance retains the two classifications of a lease as either an operating or finance lease (previously referred to as a capital lease). Both lease classifications require the lessee to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability based upon the present value of the lease payments. Finance leases will reflect the financial arrangement by recognizing interest expense on the lease liability separately from the amortization expense of the right-of-use asset. Operating leases will recognize lease expense (with no separate recognition of interest expense) on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The updated guidance requires expanded qualitative and quantitative disclosures, including additional information about the amounts recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The guidance will be effective for us in fiscal 2020 including interim periods using a modified retrospective approach. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05”.
In November 2015, the FASB issued new accounting guidance which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities, as well as any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. As a result, each jurisdiction will only have one net noncurrent deferred tax asset or liability. This guidance may be applied on either a prospective or retrospective basis and is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this guidance effective December 31, 2015 using a retrospective basis of adoption. With the adoption, our net deferred tax liability for all periods presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets has been classified as noncurrent. For June 30, 2015, the reclassification of $12.8 million of current deferred tax assets to noncurrent liabilities caused the Other Current Assets line to change from $20.5 million to $7.7 million and the Deferred Income Taxes line to change from $35.7 million to $22.9 million. As this guidance only relates to balance sheet classification, there was no impact on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
In September 2015, the FASB issued new accounting guidance which allows entities to prospectively reflect adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized for a business combination during the measurement period. Under the current guidance these adjustments need to be reflected retrospectively as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The requirements of ASU 13-02 areguidance will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012, with2015 but can be adopted early adoption permitted. As ASU 13-02 relates to disclosure requirements only, we doif financial statements have not expect the adoption ofbeen issued. We adopted this guidance toeffective July 1, 2015, and it did not have ana material impact on our consolidated financial position,statements.

Note 2 – Acquisition
On March 13, 2015, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Flatout Holdings, Inc. (“Flatout”), a privately owned manufacturer and marketer of flatbread wraps and pizza crusts based in Saline, Michigan. The purchase price, net of cash acquired, was $92.2 million and was funded by cash on hand. The purchase price was subject to a net working capital adjustment, which was settled in July 2015. Flatout is reported in our Specialty Foods segment, and its results of operations have been included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

34

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


The following purchase price allocation was based on the fair value of the net assets acquired:
Balance Sheet CaptionsAllocation
Receivables$2,479
Inventories3,749
Other current assets212
Property, plant and equipment6,937
Goodwill (not tax deductible)53,948
Other intangible assets44,000
Current liabilities(2,445)
Deferred tax liabilities(16,651)
Net assets acquired$92,229
The goodwill recognized above arose because the purchase price for Flatout reflected a number of factors including the future earnings and cash flow potential of Flatout and the avoidance of the time and costs which would be required (and the associated risks that would be encountered) to enhance our existing product offerings and enter the supermarket deli department. Goodwill also resulted from the workforce acquired with Flatout, as well as the impact of deferred tax liabilities established on the acquired assets.
We determined the values and lives of the other intangible assets listed in the allocation above as: $34.5 million for the tradename with a 30-year life; $5.0 million for the customer relationships with a 10-year life; $3.9 million for the technology / know-how with a 10-year life and $0.6 million for the non-compete agreements with a 5-year life.
Pro forma results of operations have not been presented herein as the acquisition was not considered material to our 2015 results of operations.

Note 3 – Discontinued Operations
On January 30, 2014, we sold effectively all of the net operating assets of our candle manufacturing and marketing operations for $28 million in cash. Net proceeds from the sale, after post-closing adjustments and transaction costs, totaled $25.6 million. The transaction resulted in a pretax loss of $44.0 million and a tax benefit of $15.0 million, which were recorded in the year ended June 30, 2014. The financial results of these operations for 2014 are reported as discontinued operations. The discontinued operations, previously included in our Glassware and Candles segment, had net sales of $89.4 million and a pretax loss of $39.4 million, including the pretax loss on sale, for the year ended June 30, 2014.

Note 4 – Long-Term Debt
At June 30, 2015, we had an unsecured credit facility under which we could borrow, on a revolving credit basis, up to a maximum of $120 million at any one time, with potential to expand the total credit availability to $200 million subject to us obtaining consent of the issuing banks and certain other conditions.
On April 8, 2016, we entered into a new unsecured revolving credit facility (“New Credit Facility”), which replaced the facility discussed above. The material terms and covenants of the New Credit Facility are substantially similar to our previous credit facility.
The New Credit Facility provides that we may borrow, on a revolving credit basis, up to a maximum of $150 million at any one time, with potential to expand the total credit availability to $225 million subject to us obtaining consent of the issuing banks and certain other conditions. The New Credit Facility expires on April 8, 2021, and all outstanding amounts are then due and payable. Interest is variable based upon formulas tied to LIBOR or cash flows.

an alternative base rate defined in the New Credit Facility, at our option. We must also pay facility fees that are tied to our then-applicable consolidated leverage ratio. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. Due to the nature of its terms, when we have outstanding borrowings under the New Credit Facility, they will be classified as long-term debt.
At June 30, 2016 and 2015, we had no borrowings outstanding under these facilities. At June 30, 2016, we had $4.7 million of standby letters of credit outstanding, which reduced the amount available for borrowing on the New Credit Facility. We paid no interest in 2016 and 2015.

35

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


The New Credit Facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness, asset sales and acquisitions. There are two principal financial covenants: an interest expense test that requires us to maintain an interest coverage ratio not less than 2.5 to 1 at the end of each fiscal quarter; and an indebtedness test that requires us to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio not greater than 3 to 1 at all times. The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated EBIT by Consolidated Interest Expense, and the leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated Debt by Consolidated EBITDA. All financial terms used in the covenant calculations are defined more specifically in the New Credit Facility.

Note 5 – Commitments
We have operating leases with initial noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year covering the rental of various facilities and equipment, which expire at various dates through fiscal year 2027. Certain of these leases contain renewal options, some provide options to purchase during the lease term and some require contingent rentals. The future minimum rental commitments due under these leases are summarized as follows:
  
2017$4,810
2018$4,277
2019$4,337
2020$2,472
2021$1,618
Thereafter$5,789
Total rent expense, including short-term cancelable leases, during the years ended June 30 is summarized as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Operating leases:     
Minimum rentals$5,298
 $5,036
 $5,079
Contingent rentals11
 6
 86
Short-term cancelable leases1,611
 900
 793
Total$6,920
 $5,942
 $5,958

Note 6 – Contingencies
In addition to the items discussed below, at June 30, 2016, we were a party to various claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Such matters did not have a material effect on the current-year results of operations and, in our opinion, their ultimate disposition will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
21% of our employees are represented under various collective bargaining contracts. We are currently renegotiating the labor contract for our Bedford Heights, Ohio plant facility, which produces various garlic bread products. This labor contract expired on April 30, 2016. 7% of our employees are represented under this collective bargaining contract. The labor contract for one of our Columbus, Ohio plant facilities, which produces various dressing products, will expire on March 5, 2017. 9% of our employees are represented under this collective bargaining contract. While we believe that labor relations with employees under collective bargaining contracts are satisfactory, a prolonged labor dispute could have a material effect on our business and results of operations.


36

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Note 27 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill attributable to the Specialty Foods segment was approximately $89.8$143.8 million at June 30, 20132016 and 2012.

2015.

The following table summarizes our identifiable other intangible assets, all included in the Specialty Foods segment, at June 30:

   2013  2012 

Trademarks (40-year life)

   

Gross carrying value

  $370   $370  

Accumulated amortization

   (205  (196
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying value

  $165   $174  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Customer Relationships (12 to 15-year life)

   

Gross carrying value

  $13,020   $13,020  

Accumulated amortization

   (6,863  (5,927
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net carrying value

  $6,157   $7,093  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total net carrying value

  $6,322   $7,267  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

30.

 2016 2015
Tradename (30-year life)   
Gross carrying value$34,500
 $34,500
Accumulated amortization(1,485) (365)
Net carrying value$33,015
 $34,135
Trademarks (40-year life)   
Gross carrying value$370
 $370
Accumulated amortization(232) (223)
Net carrying value$138
 $147
Customer Relationships (10 to 15-year life)   
Gross carrying value$18,020
 $18,020
Accumulated amortization(10,148) (8,882)
Net carrying value$7,872
 $9,138
Technology / Know-how (10-year life)   
Gross carrying value$3,900
 $3,900
Accumulated amortization(504) (114)
Net carrying value$3,396
 $3,786
Non-compete Agreements (5-year life)   
Gross carrying value$600
 $600
Accumulated amortization(155) (35)
Net carrying value$445
 $565
Total net carrying value$44,866
 $47,771
Amortization expense for our other intangible assets, which is reflected in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses, was as follows in each of the years endingended June 30 was as follows:

   2013   2012   2011 

Amortization expense

  $945    $1,083    $1,164  

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

30:

 2016 2015 2014
Amortization expense$2,905
 $1,605
 $946
Total annual amortization expense for each of the next five years is estimated to be as follows:

2014

  $ 946  

2015

  $946  

2016

  $775  

2017

  $604  

2018

  $604  

  
2017$2,764
2018$2,764
2019$2,764
2020$2,729
2021$2,644


37

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Note 38 – Liabilities

Accrued liabilities at June 30 were composed of:

   2013   2012 

Accrued compensation and employee benefits

  $21,785    $18,925  

Accrued distribution

   6,821     5,789  

Accrued taxes

   1,597     1,607  

Accrued marketing

   1,917     639  

Other

   3,167     5,003  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accrued liabilities

  $35,287    $31,963  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 2016 2015
Compensation and employee benefits$21,565
 $21,969
Distribution4,450
 5,445
Other taxes1,266
 1,182
Marketing1,107
 1,830
Other4,684
 5,395
Total accrued liabilities$33,072
 $35,821
Other noncurrent liabilities at June 30 were composed of:

   2013   2012 

Noncurrent workers compensation

  $9,156    $10,160  

Noncurrent gross tax contingency reserve

   912     1,781  

Noncurrent pension benefit liability

   3,456     9,183  

Noncurrent postretirement benefit liability

   2,747     2,863  

Deferred compensation and accrued interest

   3,963     3,395  

Other

   3,057     4,245  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other noncurrent liabilities

  $23,291    $31,627  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 2016 2015
Workers compensation$9,534
 $8,477
Gross tax contingency reserve1,599
 1,487
Pension benefit liability8,613
 5,070
Postretirement benefit liability939
 2,806
Deferred compensation and accrued interest4,655
 4,411
Other1,358
 1,403
Total other noncurrent liabilities$26,698
 $23,654

Note 4 – Long-Term Debt

At June 30, 2013 and 2012, we had an unsecured credit agreement under which we may borrow, on a revolving credit basis, up to a maximum of $120 million at any one time, with potential to expand the total credit availability to $200 million based on obtaining consent of the issuing banks and certain other conditions. The facility expires on April 18, 2017, and all outstanding amounts are then due and payable. Interest is variable based upon formulas tied to LIBOR or an alternative base rate defined in the credit agreement, at our option. We must also pay facility fees that are tied to our then-applicable consolidated leverage ratio. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. Based on the long-term nature of this facility, when we have outstanding borrowings under this facility, we will classify the outstanding balance as long-term debt.

At June 30, 2013 and 2012, we had no borrowings outstanding under this facility. At June 30, 2013, we had approximately $3.4 million of standby letters of credit outstanding, which reduced the amount available for borrowing under the credit agreement. We paid no interest in 2013 and 2012. At June 30, 2013 and 2012, we were in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of this facility, and we exceeded the requirements of the financial covenants by substantial margins. At June 30, 2013, we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under the facility.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness, asset sales and acquisitions. There are two principal financial covenants: an interest expense test that requires us to maintain an interest coverage ratio not less than 2.5 to 1 at the end of each fiscal quarter; and an indebtedness test that requires us to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio not greater than 3 to 1 at all times. The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated EBIT (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement) by Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement), and the leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated Debt (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement) by Consolidated EBITDA (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement).

Note 59 – Income Taxes

We and our domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated Federalfederal income tax return. Taxes based on income from continuing operations for the years ended June 30 have been provided as follows:

   2013   2012   2011 

Currently payable:

      

Federal

  $47,789    $41,214    $43,140  

State and local

   3,487     4,116     4,542  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current provision

   51,276     45,330     47,682  

Deferred Federal, state and local provision

   1,458     4,893     7,460  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total taxes based on income

  $52,734    $50,223    $55,142  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 2016 2015 2014
Currently payable:     
Federal$57,116
 $47,601
 $48,718
State and local6,502
 5,229
 4,526
Total current provision63,618
 52,830
 53,244
Deferred federal, state and local (benefit) provision(749) 36
 (951)
Total taxes based on income$62,869
 $52,866
 $52,293
Certain tax benefits recorded directly to common stock for each of the years endingended June 30 were as follows:

   2013   2012   2011 

Tax benefits recorded directly to common stock

  $794    $301    $479  

 2016 2015 2014
Tax benefits recorded directly to common stock$1,417
 $563
 $1,020
For the years ended June 30, our effective tax rate varied from the statutory Federalfederal income tax rate as a result of the following factors:

   2013  2012  2011 

Statutory rate

   35.0  35.0  35.0

State and local income taxes

   1.4    2.0    1.9  

ESOP dividend deduction

   (0.7  (0.2  (0.2

Domestic manufacturing deduction

   (2.9  (2.5  (2.5

Other

   (0.2  0.1    (0.1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effective rate

   32.6  34.4  34.1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 2016 2015 2014
Statutory rate35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
State and local income taxes2.3
 2.2
 2.0
ESOP dividend deduction(0.4) (0.2) (0.2)
Domestic manufacturing deduction for qualified income(3.0) (3.0) (3.0)
Other0.2
 0.2
 0.3
Effective rate34.1 % 34.2 % 34.1 %

38

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)



As referenced in Note 1, we adopted new accounting guidance for deferred taxes effective December 31, 2015. Our net deferred tax liability for all periods presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets has been classified as noncurrent. The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at June 30 were comprised of:

   2013  2012 

Deferred tax assets:

   

Inventories

  $2,597   $2,774  

Employee medical and other benefits

   11,161    13,201  

Receivable and other allowances

   4,375    4,699  

Other accrued liabilities

   3,133    2,869  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   21,266    23,543  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

   

Property, plant and equipment

   (21,607  (20,744

Goodwill

   (3,804  (3,427

Other

   (425  (274
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (25,836  (24,445
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax liability

  $(4,570 $(902
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net current deferred tax assets

 2016 2015
Deferred tax assets:   
Inventories$1,034
 $1,179
Employee medical and other benefits12,533
 11,135
Receivable and other allowances5,626
 5,652
Other accrued liabilities1,740
 2,229
Total deferred tax assets20,933
 20,195
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Property, plant and equipment(21,573) (22,968)
Intangible assets(14,555) (15,223)
Goodwill(6,117) (4,869)
Other(121) (75)
Total deferred tax liabilities(42,366) (43,135)
Net deferred tax liability$(21,433) $(22,940)
Prepaid federal income taxes of $4.3 million and prepaid Federal,$3.8 million were included in Other Current Assets at June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Prepaid state and local income taxes of $0.5 million and $0.6 million were included in Deferred Income Taxes and Other Current Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The related balances at June 30, were as follows:

   2013   2012 

Net current deferred tax assets

  $13,704    $13,168  

Prepaid Federal, state and local income taxes

  $7,549    $1,958  

2016 and 2015, respectively.

Cash payments for income taxes for each of the years endingended June 30 were as follows:

   2013   2012   2011 

Cash payments for income taxes

  $56,992    $38,726    $47,598  

 2016 2015 2014
Cash payments for income taxes$62,901
 $43,027
 $37,277
The gross tax contingency reserve at June 30, 20132016 was approximately $0.9$1.6 million and consisted of estimated tax liabilities of $1.0 million and interest and penalties of $0.6 million. The unrecognized tax benefits recorded as the gross tax contingency reserve noted in the following table for June 30, 20132016 and 20122015 would affect our effective tax rate, if recognized.

The following table sets forth changes in our total gross tax contingency reserve (including interest and penalties):

   2013  2012 

Balance, beginning of year

  $1,939   $1,795  

Tax positions related to the current year:

   

Additions

   66    17  

Reductions

   —      —    

Tax positions related to prior years:

   

Additions

   86    149  

Reductions

   (1,021  (22

Settlements

   (158  —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

  $912   $1,939  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 2016 2015
Balance, beginning of year$1,487
 $963
Tax positions related to the current year:   
Additions54
 54
Reductions
 
Tax positions related to prior years:   
Additions121
 516
Reductions(63) (46)
Settlements
 
Balance, end of year$1,599
 $1,487
We have not classified any of the gross tax contingency reserve at June 30, 20132016 as a current liabilitiesliability as none of these amounts are expected to be resolved within the next 12 months. TheConsequently, the entire liability of approximately $0.9$1.6 million was included in long-termother noncurrent liabilities. We expect that the amount of these liabilities will change within the next 12 months; however, we do not expect the change to have a significant effect on our financial position or results of operations.

We recognize interest and penalties related to these tax liabilities in income tax expense. For each of the years ended June 30, we recognized the change in the accrual for net tax-related interest and penalties as follows:

   2013  2012 

(Benefit) expense recognized for net tax-related interest and penalties

  $(539 $120  

 2016 2015
Expense recognized for net tax-related interest and penalties$92
 $87

39

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


We had accrued interest and penalties at June 30 as follows:

   2013   2012 

Accrued interest and penalties included in the gross tax contingency reserve

  $383    $922  

 2016 2015
Accrued interest and penalties included in the gross tax contingency reserve$571
 $479
We file income tax returns in the U.S. and various state and local jurisdictions. With limited exceptions, we are no longer subject to examination of U.S. Federalfederal or state and local income taxes for years prior to 2010.

2013.

The American Jobs Creation Act provided a tax deduction calculated as a percentage of qualified income from manufacturing in the United States. The deduction percentage for 20132016 was 9%. In accordance with FASB guidance, this deduction is treated as a special deduction, as opposed to a tax rate reduction.

reduction and is properly reflected in the effective tax rate table.


Note 610Stock-Based Compensation

Business Segment Information

We operate our business in one reportable segment, “Specialty Foods.” Our shareholders approved the adoption ofmanagement evaluates segment performance based on sales and subsequent amendmentsoperating income.
The following table sets forth information with respect to the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The 2005 Plan reserved 2,000,000 common shares for issuance toamount of net sales contributed by each class of similar products of our employees and directors, and all awards granted under the 2005 Plan will be exercisable at prices not less than fair market value asconsolidated net sales in each of the dateyears ended June 30:
 2016 2015 2014
Specialty Foods     
Non-frozen$818,716
 $741,726
 $681,872
Frozen372,393
 362,788
 359,203
Total$1,191,109
 $1,104,514
 $1,041,075
Our Corporate Expensesinclude various expenses of a general corporate nature, as well as costs related to certain divested or closed nonfood operations, including the grant. The vesting period for awards granted under the 2005 Plan varies asexpense associated with retirement plans applicable to those closed units, and therefore have not been allocated to the typeSpecialty Foods segment.

40

Table of award granted, but generally these awards have a maximum term of five years.

Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights

We use periodic grants of stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SSSARs”) as a vehicle for rewarding certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value. We calculate the fair value of SSSARs grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Our policy is to issue shares upon SSSARs exercise from new shares that had been previously authorized.

Contents

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

In 2013, 2012 and 2011, we granted SSSARs to various employees under the terms of the 2005 Plan.



The following table summarizessets forth certain additional financial segment information relating to these grants:

   2013  2012  2011 

SSSARs granted

   108    187    94  

Weighted average grant date fair value per right

  $9.04   $9.07   $10.12  

Assumptions used in fair value calculations:

    

Risk-free interest rate

   0.33  0.41  1.27

Dividend yield

   2.09  2.11  2.28

Volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock

   23.23  24.30  28.78

Weighted average expected life in years

   2.67    2.76    3.11  

Estimated forfeiture rate

   2  4  4

For each grant, the volatility factor was estimated based on actual historical volatility of our stockcontinuing operations for a time period equal to the term of the SSSARs. The expected average life was determined based on historical exercise experience for this type of grant. The SSSARs from each grant vest one-third on the first anniversary of the grant date, one-third on the second anniversary of the grant date and one-third on the third anniversary of the grant date.

We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Compensation expense was reflected in Cost of Sales or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees’ salaries expense classification and was allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded tax benefits and gross windfall tax benefits related to SSSARs. These windfall tax benefits were included in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The following table summarizes SSSARs compensation expense and tax benefits recorded for each of the years endingended June 30:

   2013   2012   2011 

Compensation expense

  $1,436    $1,624    $1,120  

Tax benefits

  $503    $569    $392  

Intrinsic value of exercises

  $1,851    $559    $922  

Gross windfall tax benefits

  $659    $230    $334  

The total fair values30 and certain items retained at the corporate level:

 2016 2015 2014
      
Net Sales (1) (2)
$1,191,109
 $1,104,514
 $1,041,075
Operating Income (2)
     
Specialty Foods$196,592
 $167,095
 $165,383
Corporate Expenses(12,022) (12,234) (11,616)
Total$184,570
 $154,861
 $153,767
Identifiable Assets (1) (3)
     
Specialty Foods$515,553
 $514,605
 $405,416
Corporate119,179
 187,551
 221,885
Total$634,732
 $702,156
 $627,301
Capital Expenditures     
Specialty Foods$16,652
 $18,230
 $15,578
Corporate19
 68
 67
Total$16,671
 $18,298
 $15,645
Depreciation and Amortization     
Specialty Foods$24,001
 $20,929
 $18,785
Corporate146
 182
 208
Total$24,147
 $21,111
 $18,993
(1)Net sales and long-lived assets are predominately domestic.
(2)All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
(3)Segment identifiable assets include those assets used in its operations and other intangible assets allocated to purchased businesses. Corporate assets consist principally of cash and equivalents. The decline in Corporate assets from June 30, 2015 to June 30, 2016 was due to the decrease in cash resulting from the payment of the December 2015 special dividend.
Net sales attributable to McLane Company, Inc. (“McLane”), a wholesale distribution subsidiary of SSSARs vestedBerkshire Hathaway, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) for each of the years ended June 30 were as follows:

   2013   2012   2011 

Fair value of vested rights

  $1,476    $1,107    $1,095  

 2016 2015 2014
Net sales to McLane$232,241
 $202,218
 $186,817
As a percentage of consolidated net sales19% 18% 18%
Net sales to Wal-Mart$189,417
 $177,354
 $175,388
As a percentage of consolidated net sales16% 16% 17%
Accounts receivable attributable to Wal-Mart and McLane at June 30 as a percentage of consolidated accounts receivable were as follows:
 2016 2015
Wal-Mart25% 26%
McLane17% 14%


41

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The following table summarizes the activity relating to SSSARs granted under the 2005 Plan for the year ended June 30, 2013:

   Number of
Rights
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding at beginning of year

   446   $60.55      

Exercised

   (175 $55.48      

Granted

   108   $72.67      

Forfeited

   (5 $63.50      
  

 

 

      

Outstanding at end of year

   374   $66.42     3.51    $4,323  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Exercisable and vested at end of year

   111   $60.89     2.46    $1,904  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Vested and expected to vest at end of year

   365   $66.41     3.50    $4,220  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table summarizes information about the SSSARs outstanding by grant year at June 30, 2013:

   Outstanding   Exercisable 
           Weighted Average         

Grant Years

  Range of
Exercise Prices
   Number
Outstanding
   Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
   Exercise
Price
   Number
Exercisable
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 

2013

  $72.67     108     4.66    $72.67     —      $—    

2012

  $63.50 - 68.12     158     3.65    $ 68.07     34    $68.12  

2011

  $57.78     54     2.65    $57.78     23    $57.78  

2010

  $58.79     50     1.66    $58.79     50    $58.79  

2009

  $39.86     4     0.66    $39.86     4    $39.86  

At June 30, 2013, there was approximately $1.5 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to SSSARs that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.04 years.

Restricted Stock

We use periodic grants of restricted stock as a vehicle for rewarding our nonemployee directors and certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value.

In 2013, 2012 and 2011, we granted shares of restricted stock to various employees under the terms of the 2005 Plan. The following table summarizes information relating to these grants:

   2013  2012  2011 

Employees

    

Restricted stock granted

   8    25    7  

Grant date fair value

  $572   $1,705   $390  

Weighted average grant date fair value per award

  $72.67   $68.08   $57.78  

Estimated forfeiture rate

   3  4  4

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The restricted stock under each of these employee grants vests on the third anniversary of the grant date. Under the terms of the grants, employees receive dividends on unforfeited restricted stock regardless of their vesting status. Approximately 23,000, 6,000 and 22,000 shares of employee restricted stock vested in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

In 2013, 2012 and 2011, we also granted shares of restricted stock to our seven nonemployee directors under the terms of the 2005 Plan. The following table summarizes information relating to each of these grants:

   2013   2012   2011 

Nonemployee directors

      

Restricted stock granted

   7     7     8  

Grant date fair value

  $490    $490    $420  

Weighted average grant date fair value per award

  $73.29    $65.97    $51.52  

The 2013 grant vests over a one-year period, and all of these shares are expected to vest. Dividends earned on the stock during the vesting period will be paid to the directors at the time the stock vests. Approximately 7,000, 8,000 and 8,000 shares of nonemployee director restricted stock vested in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and the directors were paid the related dividends.

We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Compensation expense was reflected in Cost of Sales or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees’ salaries expense classification and was allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded tax benefits and gross windfall tax benefits related to restricted stock. These windfall tax benefits were included in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The following table summarizes restricted stock compensation expense and tax benefits recorded for each of the years ending June 30:

   2013   2012   2011 

Compensation expense

  $1,465    $1,298    $1,177  

Tax benefits

  $513    $454    $412  

Gross windfall tax benefits

  $135    $71    $145  

The total fair values of restricted stock vested for each of the years ended June 30 were as follows:

   2013   2012   2011 

Fair value of vested shares

  $1,842    $645    $1,258  

The following table summarizes the activity relating to restricted stock granted under the 2005 Plan for the year ended June 30, 2013:

   Number of
Shares
  Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
 

Unvested restricted stock at beginning of year

   62   $63.25  

Granted

   15   $72.95  

Vested

   (31 $60.58  

Forfeited

   (1 $62.88  
  

 

 

  

Unvested restricted stock at end of year

   45   $68.16  
  

 

 

  

At June 30, 2013, there was approximately $1.7 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.76 years.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Note 711 – Stock-Based Compensation
Our shareholders previously approved the adoption of and subsequent amendments to the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The 2005 Plan reserved 2,000,000 common shares for issuance to our employees and directors. As the 2005 Plan expired in May 2015, we obtained shareholder approval of the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) at our November 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The 2015 Plan did not affect any currently outstanding equity awards granted under the 2005 Plan. The 2015 Plan reserved 1,500,000 common shares for issuance to our employees and directors. All awards granted under these plans will be exercisable at prices not less than fair market value as of the date of the grant. The vesting period for awards granted under these plans varies as to the type of award granted, but generally these awards have a maximum term of five years.
We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period of the grant. Compensation expense is reflected in Cost of Sales or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses based on the grantees’ salaries expense classification. We record tax benefits and excess tax benefits related to stock-settled stock appreciation rights (“SSSARs”) and restricted stock awards. These excess tax benefits are included in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As needed, we estimate a forfeiture rate for our SSSARs and restricted stock grants based on historical experience.
Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights
We use periodic grants of SSSARs as a vehicle for rewarding certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value. We calculate the fair value of SSSARs grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Our policy is to issue shares upon SSSARs exercise from new shares that had been previously authorized.
In 2016, 2015 and 2014, we granted SSSARs to various employees under the terms of the plans. The following table summarizes information relating to these grants:
 2016 2015 2014
SSSARs granted240
 149
 146
Weighted average grant date fair value per right$12.23
 $9.94
 $11.84
Weighted average assumptions used in fair value calculations:     
Risk-free interest rate0.86% 0.86% 0.75%
Dividend yield1.93% 2.02% 1.97%
Volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock20.88% 19.62% 22.35%
Weighted average expected life in years2.69
 2.71
 3.12
For these grants, the volatility factor was estimated based on actual historical volatility of our stock for a time period equal to the term of the SSSARs. The expected average life was determined based on historical exercise experience for this type of grant. The SSSARs we grant vest one-third on the first anniversary of the grant date, one-third on the second anniversary of the grant date and one-third on the third anniversary of the grant date.
The following table summarizes our continuing operations SSSARs compensation expense and tax benefits recorded for each of the years ended June 30:
 2016 2015 2014
Compensation expense$1,472
 $1,288
 $1,092
Tax benefits$515
 $451
 $382
Intrinsic value of exercises$3,788
 $1,162
 $2,692
Excess tax benefits$1,341
 $410
 $942
The total fair values of SSSARs vested for each of the years ended June 30 were as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Fair value of vested rights$1,192
 $1,252
 $1,145

42

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


The following table summarizes the activity relating to SSSARs granted under the plans for the year ended June 30, 2016:
 
Number of
Rights
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding at beginning of year395
 $84.24
    
Exercised(180) $79.11
    
Granted240
 $103.87
    
Forfeited(20) $88.72
    
Outstanding at end of year435
 $97.01
 3.97 $13,302
Exercisable and vested at end of year62
 $84.26
 2.52 $2,673
Vested and expected to vest at end of year408
 $96.74
 3.93 $12,594
The following table summarizes information about the SSSARs outstanding by grant year at June 30, 2016:
  Outstanding Exercisable
      Weighted Average    
Grant Years 
Range of
Exercise Prices
 
Number
Outstanding
 
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
 
Exercise
Price
 
Number
Exercisable
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
2016 $101.70-$112.62 240 4.68 $103.87  $—
2015 $91.13 113 3.65 $91.13 20 $91.13
2014 $79.78-$89.29 64 2.65 $89.11 24 $89.07
2013 $72.67 7 1.66 $72.67 7 $72.67
2012 $63.50-$68.12 11 0.65 $68.12 11 $68.12
At June 30, 2016, there was $3.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to SSSARs that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of 2 years.
Restricted Stock
We use periodic grants of restricted stock as a vehicle for rewarding our nonemployee directors and certain employees with long-term incentives for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value.
In 2016, 2015 and 2014, we granted shares of restricted stock to various employees under the terms of the plans. The following table summarizes information relating to these grants:
 2016 2015 2014
Employees     
Restricted stock granted28
 9
 24
Grant date fair value$2,923
 $845
 $2,190
Weighted average grant date fair value per award$102.89
 $91.13
 $89.21
The restricted stock under these employee grants vests on the third anniversary of the grant date. Under the terms of our grants, employees receive dividends on unforfeited restricted stock regardless of their vesting status. In 2016, 2015 and 2014, 6,000, 20,000 and 6,000 shares, respectively, of employee restricted stock vested.
In 2016, 2015 and 2014, we also granted shares of restricted stock to our nonemployee directors under the terms of the plans. The following table summarizes information relating to each of these grants:
 2016 2015 2014
Nonemployee directors     
Restricted stock granted6
 7
 6
Grant date fair value$639
 $639
 $490
Weighted average grant date fair value per award$112.05
 $92.92
 $84.42

43

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


The 2016 grant vests over a one-year period, and all of these shares are expected to vest. Dividends earned on the stock during the vesting period will be paid to the directors at the time the stock vests. In 2016, 2015 and 2014, 7,000, 6,000 and 7,000 shares, respectively, of nonemployee director restricted stock vested, and the directors were paid the related dividends.
The following table summarizes our continuing operations restricted stock compensation expense and tax benefits recorded for each of the years ended June 30:
 2016 2015 2014
Compensation expense$1,854
 $1,752
 $1,434
Tax benefits$649
 $613
 $502
Excess tax benefits$76
 $153
 $78
The total fair values of restricted stock vested for each of the years ended June 30 were as follows:
 2016 2015 2014
Fair value of vested shares$1,124
 $1,836
 $931
The following table summarizes the activity relating to restricted stock granted under the plans for the year ended June 30, 2016:
 
Number of
Shares
 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Unvested restricted stock at beginning of year45
 $87.71
Granted34
 $104.43
Vested(13) $83.59
Forfeited(3) $86.48
Unvested restricted stock at end of year63
 $97.71
At June 30, 2016, there was $3.5 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of 2 years.

Note 12 – Pension Benefits

Defined Benefit Pension Plans

We sponsor multiple defined benefit pension plans that have covered certain union workers.workers under collective bargaining contracts. However, as a result of prior-years’ restructuring activities, for all periods presented, we no longer have any active employees continuing to accrue service cost or otherwise eligible to receive plan benefits. Benefits being paid under the plans are primarily based on negotiated rates and years of service. We contribute to these plans at least the minimum amount required by regulation.

At the end of the year, we discount our plan liabilities using an assumed discount rate. In estimating this rate, we, along with our third-party actuaries, review the timing of future benefit payments, bond indices, consider yield curve analysis results and the past history of discount rates.

The actuarial present value of benefit obligations summarized below was based on the following assumption:

   2013  2012 

Weighted-average assumption as of June 30

   

Discount rate

   4.57  3.78

 2016 2015
Weighted-average assumption as of June 30   
Discount rate3.39% 4.12%
The net periodic benefit costs were determined utilizing the following beginning-of-the-year assumptions:

   2013  2012  2011 

Discount rate

   3.78  5.29  5.21

Expected long-term return on plan assets

   7.00  7.00  7.00

 2016 2015 2014
Discount rate4.12% 4.02% 4.57%
Expected long-term return on plan assets7.00% 7.00% 7.00%

44

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


In determining the long-term expected return on plan assets, we consider our related investment guidelines, our expectations of long-term rates of return by asset category, our target asset allocation weighting and historical rates of return and volatility for equity and fixed income investments. The investment strategy for plan assets is to control and manage investment risk through diversification among asset classes, investment managers/funds and investment styles. The plans’ investment guidelines have been designed to meet the intended objective that plan assets earn at least nominal returns equal to or in excess of the plans’ liability growth rate. In consideration of the current average age of the plans’ participants, the investment guidelines are based upon an investment horizon of at least 10 years.

The target and actual asset allocations for our plans at June 30 by asset category were as follows:

   Target Percentage
of Plan Assets at
June 30
  Actual Percentage of Plan Assets 
   2013  2013  2012 

Cash and equivalents

   0-10  2  2

Equity securities

   30-70  51    50  

Fixed income

   30-70  47    48  
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

    100  100
   

 

 

  

 

 

 

 
Target Percentage
of Plan Assets at
June 30
 Actual Percentage of Plan Assets
 2016 2016 2015
Cash and equivalents0%-10% 2% 2%
Equity securities30%-70% 50
 49
Fixed income30%-70% 48
 49
Total  100% 100%
Our target asset allocations are maintained through ongoing review and periodic rebalancing of equity and fixed income investments with assistance from an independent outside investment consultant. Also, the plan assets are diversified among asset classes, asset managers or funds and investment styles to avoid concentrations of risk. We expect that a modest allocation to cash will exist within the plans because each investment manager is likely to hold limited cash in a portfolio.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

We categorize our plan assets within a three-level fair value hierarchy as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets.

Level 2 – Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

The following table summarizes the fair values and levels, within the fair value hierarchy, for our plan assets at June 30, 2013 and 2012:

   June 30, 2013 

Asset Category

  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 

Cash and equivalents

  $543    $—      $—      $543  

Money market funds

   319     —       —       319  

U.S. government obligations

   —       4,275     —       4,275  

Corporate obligations

   —       2,440     —       2,440  

Mortgage obligations

   —       1,911     —       1,911  

Mutual funds fixed income

   8,455     —       —       8,455  

Mutual funds equity

   18,300     —       —       18,300  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $27,617    $8,626    $—      $36,243  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   June 30, 2012 

Asset Category

  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 

Cash and equivalents

  $168    $—      $—      $168  

Money market funds

   488     —       —       488  

U.S. government obligations

   —       4,707     —       4,707  

Corporate obligations

   —       2,196     —       2,196  

Mortgage obligations

   —       1,958     —       1,958  

Mutual funds fixed income

   8,054     —       —       8,054  

Mutual funds equity

   17,564     —       —       17,564  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $26,274    $8,861    $—      $35,135  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

30:

 June 30, 2016
Asset CategoryLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Cash and equivalents$557
 $
 $
 $557
Money market funds267
 
 
 267
U.S. government obligations
 4,785
 
 4,785
Municipal obligations
 139
 
 139
Corporate obligations
 2,927
 
 2,927
Mortgage obligations
 1,998
 
 1,998
Mutual funds fixed income7,135
 
 
 7,135
Mutual funds equity17,874
 
 
 17,874
Total$25,833
 $9,849
 $
 $35,682
        
 June 30, 2015
Asset CategoryLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Cash and equivalents$522
 $
 $
 $522
Money market funds181
 
 
 181
U.S. government obligations
 4,266
 
 4,266
Municipal obligations
 161
 
 161
Corporate obligations
 3,174
 
 3,174
Mortgage obligations
 1,857
 
 1,857
Mutual funds fixed income8,820
 
 
 8,820
Mutual funds equity18,165
 
 
 18,165
Total$27,688
 $9,458
 $
 $37,146

45

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


The plan assets classified at Level 1 include money market funds common stock and mutual funds. Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets are available for investments in this category.

The plan assets classified at Level 2 include fixed income securities consisting of government securities, municipal obligations, corporate obligations and mortgage obligations and other asset backed securities.obligations. For these types of securities, market prices are observable for identical or similar investment securities but not readily accessible for each of those investments individually at the measurement date. For these assets, we obtain pricing information from an independent pricing service. The pricing service uses various pricing models for each asset class that are consistent with what other market participants would use. The inputs and assumptions to the model of the pricing service are derived from market observable sources including as applicable: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, prepayment speed assumptions, attributes of the collateral, yield or price of bonds of comparable structuretwo-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and quality, and other market-related data.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

reference data including market research publications.

Relevant information with respect to our pension benefits as of June 30 can be summarized as follows:

   2013  2012 

Change in benefit obligation

   

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

  $44,318   $37,639  

Interest cost

   1,633    1,933  

Actuarial (gain) loss

   (4,188  6,966  

Benefits paid

   (2,244  (2,220
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Benefit obligation at end of year

  $39,519   $44,318  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2013  2012 

Change in plan assets

   

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

  $35,135   $35,346  

Actual return on plan assets

   3,352    997  

Employer contributions

   —      1,012  

Benefits paid

   (2,244  (2,220
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  $36,243   $35,135  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2013  2012 

Reconciliation of funded status

   

Net accrued benefit cost

  $(3,276 $(9,183
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2013  2012 

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of

   

Prepaid benefit cost (noncurrent assets)

  $180   $—    

Accrued benefit liability (noncurrent liabilities)

   (3,456  (9,183
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net amount recognized

  $(3,276 $(9,183
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2013  2012 

Accumulated benefit obligation

  $39,519   $44,318  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 2016 2015
Change in benefit obligation   
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$42,042
 $41,233
Interest cost1,685
 1,612
Actuarial loss2,683
 1,414
Benefits paid(2,258) (2,217)
Benefit obligation at end of year$44,152
 $42,042
 2016 2015
Change in plan assets   
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$37,146
 $38,725
Actual return on plan assets794
 638
Employer contributions
 
Benefits paid(2,258) (2,217)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$35,682
 $37,146
 2016 2015
Reconciliation of funded status   
Net accrued benefit cost$(8,470) $(4,896)
 2016 2015
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of   
Prepaid benefit cost (noncurrent assets)$143
 $174
Accrued benefit liability (noncurrent liabilities)(8,613) (5,070)
Net amount recognized$(8,470) $(4,896)
 2016 2015
Accumulated benefit obligation$44,152
 $42,042
The following table discloses, in the aggregate, those plans with benefit obligations in excess of the fair value of plan assets at the June 30 measurement date:

   2013   2012 

Benefit obligations

  $36,270    $44,318  

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  $32,814    $35,135  

 2016 2015
Benefit obligations$41,301
 $38,980
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$32,688
 $33,910

46

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)



Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 30 were as follows:

   2013  2012 

Net actuarial loss

  $14,110   $19,957  

Net transition asset

   —      (1

Income taxes

   (5,213  (7,374
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $8,897   $12,582  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 2016 2015
Net actuarial loss$20,434
 $16,564
Income taxes(7,550) (6,120)
Total$12,884
 $10,444
The amount in accumulated other comprehensive loss expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost during the next fiscal year is as follows:

   2014 

Net actuarial loss

  $461  

 2017
Net actuarial loss$715
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit (income) costincome for our pension plans at June 30:

   2013  2012  2011 

Components of net periodic benefit (income) cost

    

Interest cost

  $1,633   $1,933   $1,947  

Expected return on plan assets

   (2,380  (2,397  (2,027

Amortization of unrecognized net loss

   687    355    546  

Amortization of unrecognized net asset existing at transition

   (1  (1  (1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit (income) cost

  $(61 $(110 $465  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 2016 2015 2014
Components of net periodic benefit income     
Interest cost$1,685
 $1,612
 $1,754
Expected return on plan assets(2,520) (2,632) (2,457)
Amortization of unrecognized net loss539
 429
 460
Net periodic benefit income$(296) $(591) $(243)
We have not yet finalized our anticipated funding level for 2014,2017, but based on initial estimates, we do not expect to make any contributions to our pension plans during 2014.

2017.

Benefit payments estimated for future years are as follows:

2014

  $2,279  

2015

  $2,243  

2016

  $2,247  

2017

  $2,290  

2018

  $2,324  

2019 - 2023

  $ 12,733  

Note 8 – Postretirement Benefits

Postretirement Medical and Life Insurance Benefit Plans

We and certain of our operating subsidiaries provide multiple postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans. We recognize the cost of benefits as the employees render service. Postretirement benefits are funded as incurred. At the end of the year, we discount our plan liabilities using an assumed discount rate. In estimating this rate, we, along with our third-party actuaries, review the projected timing of future benefit payments, bond indices, consider yield curve analysis results and the past history of discount rates.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

The actuarial present value of benefit obligations summarized below was based on the following assumption:

   2013  2012 

Weighted-average assumption as of June 30

   

Discount rate

   4.57%   3.78

The net periodic benefit costs were determined utilizing the following beginning-of-the-year assumptions:

   2013  2012  2011 

Discount rate

   3.78  5.29  5.21

Health care cost trend rate pre-Medicare

   10.00  10.00  10.00

Health care cost trend rate Medicare

   7.00  10.00  10.00

Relevant information with respect to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefits as of June 30 can be summarized as follows:

   2013  2012 

Change in benefit obligation

   

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

  $3,054   $2,881  

Service cost

   31    25  

Interest cost

   113    147  

Actuarial (gain) loss

   (162  70  

Plan participant contributions

   55    61  

Benefits paid

   (157  (130
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Benefit obligation at end of year

  $2,934   $3,054  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2013  2012 

Change in plan assets

   

Employer contributions

  $102   $69  

Plan participant contributions

   55    61  

Benefits paid

   (157  (130
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  $—     $—    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2013  2012 

Reconciliation of funded status

   

Net accrued benefit cost

  $(2,934)  $(3,054
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

   2013  2012 

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of

   

Current accrued benefit liability

  $(187 $(191
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Noncurrent accrued benefit liability

  $(2,747 $(2,863
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2013  2012 

Accumulated benefit obligation

  $2,934   $3,054  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 30 were as follows:

                            
   2013  2012 

Net actuarial gain

  $(784 $(644

Prior service benefit

   (18  (23

Income taxes

   296    247  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $(506 $(420
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost during the next fiscal year are as follows:

   2014 

Prior service asset amortization

  $(5

Unrecognized gain amortization

   (27
  

 

 

 

Total

  $(32
  

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit cost at June 30:

   2013  2012  2011 

Components of net periodic benefit cost

    

Service cost

  $31   $25   $24  

Interest cost

   113    147    137  

Amortization of unrecognized net gain

   (22  (31  (46

Amortization of prior service asset

   (5  (5  (5
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

  $117   $136   $110  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

We expect to contribute approximately $0.2 million to our postretirement benefit plans in 2014.

Benefit payments estimated for future years are as follows:

2014

  $187  

2015

  $182  

2016

  $189  

2017

  $184  

2018

  $190  

2019 - 2023

  $944  

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

For other postretirement benefit measurement purposes, annual increases in medical costs for 2013 for pre-Medicare eligible claims were assumed to total approximately 8% per year and gradually decline to 5% by approximately the year 2021 and remain level thereafter. However, for Medicare eligible claims, the annual increases in medical costs for 2013 were assumed to total approximately 7% per year and gradually decline to 5% by approximately the year 2021 and remain level thereafter. Annual increases in medical costs for 2012 for pre-Medicare eligible claims were assumed to total approximately 10% per year and gradually decline to 5% by approximately the year 2017 and remain level thereafter. However, for Medicare eligible claims, the annual increases in medical costs for 2012 were assumed to total approximately 7% per year and gradually decline to 5% by approximately the year 2016 and remain level thereafter.

Assumed health care cost rates can have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effect:

  1-Percentage-Point
Increase
  1-Percentage-Point
Decrease
 

Effect on total of service and interest cost components

 $8   $(7

Effect on postretirement benefit obligation as of June 30, 2013

 $195   $(171
  
2017$2,325
2018$2,333
2019$2,352
2020$2,394
2021$2,424
2022 - 2026$12,664

Note 913 – Postretirement Benefits
Postretirement Medical and Life Insurance Benefit Plans
We and certain of our operating subsidiaries provide multiple postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans. We recognize the cost of benefits as the employees render service. Postretirement benefits are funded as incurred. At the end of the year, we discount our plan liabilities using an assumed discount rate. In estimating this rate, we, along with our third-party actuaries, review the projected timing of future benefit payments, bond indices, consider yield curve analysis results and the past history of discount rates.
In the quarter ended December 31, 2015, we terminated the medical benefits offered under the plans. The reduction in these benefits was accounted for as a negative plan amendment and resulted in the subsequent remeasurement of our benefit obligation. The remeasurement reduced the net periodic benefit cost for 2016 compared to the amount expected prior to the remeasurement.
Additional disclosures for postretirement benefits have not been presented herein as these disclosures are no longer considered material following the termination of medical benefits described above.


47

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Note 14 – Defined Contribution and Other Employee Plans

Defined Contribution Plans
We sponsored four defined contribution plans established pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code during 2013.2016. Contributions are determined under various formulas, and we contributed to threetwo of the plans in 2013.2016. Costs related to such plans for each of the years endingended June 30 were as follows:

   2013   2012   2011 

Costs related to defined contribution plans

  $906    $859    $820  

 2016 2015 2014
Costs related to defined contribution plans$992
 $888
 $808
Multiemployer Plans
Certain of our subsidiaries participate in multiemployer plans that provide pension benefits to retiree union workers under collective bargaining contracts at such locations. These plans generally provide for retirement, death and/or termination benefits for eligible employees within the applicable collective bargaining agreement,contract, based on specific eligibility/participation requirements, vesting periods and benefit formulas. The risks of participating in these multiemployer plans are different from single-employer plans in the following aspects: 1)(1) assets contributed to the multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers, 2)(2) if a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers and 3)(3) if we choose to stop participating in any of our multiemployer plans, we may be required to pay those plans an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.

Our participation in these plans for the annual period ended June 30, 20132016 is reflected in the following table. All information in the table is as of December 31 of the relevant year, except contributions which are based on our fiscal year, or except as otherwise noted. The EIN-PN column provides the Employer Identification Number (“EIN”) and the Plan Number (“PN”). The pension protection act zone status is based on information that we received from the plan. Among other factors, generally, plans in critical status (red zone) are less than 65 percent funded, plans in endangered or seriously endangered status (yellow zone or orange zone, respectively) are less than 80 percent funded, and plans at least 80 percent funded are said to be in the green zone. The FIP/RP status pending/implemented column indicates plans for which a funding improvement plan (“FIP”) or a rehabilitation plan (“RP”) is either pending or has been implemented by the trustees of each plan. There have been no significant changes that affect the comparability of 2013, 20122016, 2015 or 20112014 contributions.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

     Pension Protection
Act Zone Status
   Fiscal Year
Contributions
      

Plan Name

 EIN/PN 2012 2011 FIP/RP Status
Pending /
Implemented
 2013  2012  2011  Surcharge
Imposed
 Expiration
Date of
Collective
Bargaining
Agreement
 

Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund

 34-0904419-001 Red
12/31/11
 Red
12/31/10
 Yes,
Implemented
 $1,324   $1,311   $1,212   Yes (1)  11/1/13  

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan

 91-6145047-001 Green
12/31/11
 Green
12/31/10
 No  390    416    426   No  12/14/13  
     

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

Total contributions to multiemployer plans

     $1,714   $1,727   $1,638    
     

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

(1)A surcharge of 10% of required employer contributions under the collective bargaining agreement.

  
   
Pension Protection
Act Zone Status
   
Fiscal Year
Contributions
    
Plan Name EIN/PN 2015 2014 
FIP/RP Status
Pending /
Implemented
 2016 2015 2014 
Surcharge
Imposed
 
Expiration
Date of
Collective
Bargaining
Agreement
Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund 34-0904419-001 Red
12/31/14
 Red
12/31/13
 Yes,
Implemented
 $1,605
 $1,501
 $1,332
 No 4/30/2016
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan 91-6145047-001 Green
12/31/14
 Green
12/31/13
 No 420
 440
 397
 No 12/15/2018
Total contributions to multiemployer plans         $2,025
 $1,941
 $1,729
    
Our contributions to the Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Pension Fund exceeded 5% of the total contributions to the plan in the plan years ended December 31, 20112014, 2013 and 2010.

We contribute2012.

In addition to pension benefits provided under these two multiemployer postretirement benefit plans, other than pensions under the terms of collective bargaining agreementswe also contribute amounts for health and welfare benefits that cover active union workers.are defined by each plan. These benefits are not vested. As we are unable to separate contribution amounts to multiemployer postretirement benefit plans other than pensions from contribution amounts paid to active benefit plans, the aggregateThe contributions required by our participation in the multiemployerthese plans for these postretirement health and welfare benefits for each of the years endingended June 30 were as follows:

   2013   2012   2011 

Multiemployer health and welfare plan contributions, including postretirement contributions

  $3,666    $3,659    $3,437  

 2016 2015 2014
Multiemployer health and welfare plan contributions$3,559
 $3,796
 $3,367

48

Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)


Deferred Compensation Plan
We offer a deferred compensation plan for select employees who may elect to defer a certain percentage of annual compensation. We do not match any contributions. Each participant earns interest based upon the prime rate of interest, adjusted semi-annually, on their respective deferred compensation balance. Participants are paid out upon retirement or termination.
The following table summarizes our liability for total deferred compensation and accrued interest at June 30:

   2013   2012 

Liability for deferred compensation and accrued interest

  $3,963    $3,395  

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 2016 2015
Liability for deferred compensation and accrued interest$4,655
 $4,411
Deferred compensation expense for each of the years endingended June 30 was as follows:

   2013   2012   2011 

Deferred compensation expense

  $118    $101    $88  

 2016 2015 2014
Deferred compensation expense$151
 $136
 $131

Note 10 – Commitments

We have operating leases with initial noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year covering the rental of various facilities and equipment, which expire at various dates through fiscal year 2020. Certain of these leases contain renewal options, some provide options to purchase during the lease term and some require contingent rentals based on usage. The future minimum rental commitments due under these leases are summarized as follows:

2014

  $4,764  

2015

  $3,483  

2016

  $1,675  

2017

  $1,178  

2018

  $964  

Thereafter

  $1,151  

Total rent expense, including short-term cancelable leases, during the years ended June 30 is summarized as follows:

   2013   2012   2011 

Operating Leases:

      

Minimum rentals

  $5,065    $4,709    $4,491  

Contingent rentals

   127     274     217  

Short-term cancelable leases

   1,120     1,407     1,621  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $6,312    $6,390    $6,329  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note 11 – Contingencies

In addition to the items discussed below, at June 30, 2013, we were a party to various claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Such matters did not have a material effect on the current-year results of operations and, in our opinion, their ultimate disposition will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Approximately 18% of our employees are represented under various collective bargaining agreements. Approximately 11% of our employees are represented under collective bargaining agreements that will expire within one year. While we believe that labor relations with unionized employees are good, a prolonged labor dispute could have a material effect on our business and results of operations.

CDSOA provides for the distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs from anti-dumping cases to qualifying domestic producers. Our CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $0.3 million, $2.7 million and $14.4 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

CDSOA remittances relate to certain candles being imported from the People’s Republic of China. CDSOA provisions for remittances apply only to duties collected on products imported prior to October 2007. Accordingly, we may receive some level of annual distributions for an undetermined period of years in the future as the monies collected that relate to entries filed prior to October 2007 are administratively

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

finalized by U.S. Customs. Without further legislative action, we expect these distributions will eventually cease.

Cases have been brought in U.S. courts challenging certain aspects of CDSOA. In two separate cases, the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) ruled that the procedure for determining recipients eligible to receive CDSOA distributions is unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed both CIT decisions and the U.S. Supreme Court did not hear either case. This allowed the appellate court decisions to stand, but other legal challenges to CDSOA are still pending.

We are unable to determine, at this time, what the ultimate outcome of the other legal challenges will be, and it is possible that further legal actions, potential additional changes in the law and other factors could affect the amount of funds available for distribution, including funds relating to entries prior to October 2007. Accordingly, we cannot predict the amount of future distributions, if any, we may receive. U.S. Customs has advised affected domestic producers that it is possible that CDSOA distributions could be subject to clawback until the resolution of outstanding litigation. We believe that the likelihood of clawback is remote. Any change in CDSOA distributions could affect our earnings and cash flow.

Note 12 – Business Segments Information

We operate our business in two distinct operating and reportable segments: “Specialty Foods” and “Glassware and Candles.” Our management evaluates segment performance based on sales and operating income.

Specialty Foods–includes the production, marketing and sale of a family of pourable and refrigerated produce salad dressings, croutons, sauces, fruit glazes, refrigerated produce vegetable and fruit dips, chip dips, dry and frozen pasta and egg noodles, caviar, frozen hearth-baked breads, frozen yeast rolls, sweet rolls and biscuits. Salad dressings, sauces, croutons, frozen pasta and egg noodles, frozen bread products and frozen yeast rolls are sold to both retail and foodservice markets. The remaining products of this business segment are primarily directed to retail markets.

Glassware and Candles–includes the production and marketing of candles in a variety of popular sizes, shapes and scents and other home fragrance products and, through May 2013, also included the distribution of various commercial products, including glassware and candles. This segment’s products are sold primarily to retail markets such as mass merchandisers and food and drug stores and, through May 2013, to a lesser extent to commercial markets. The commercial product lines were sold in May 2013. The sales and related operating income were not material to the segment’s results of operations.

The following table sets forth reportable segment information with respect to the amount of net sales contributed by each class of similar products of our consolidated net sales in each of the years ending June 30:

   2013   2012   2011 

Specialty Foods

      

Non-frozen

  $649,447    $621,497    $570,547  

Frozen

   364,356     367,440     352,309  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Specialty Foods

  $1,013,803    $988,937    $922,856  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Glassware and Candles

      

Consumer table and giftware

  $148,304    $137,526    $161,635  

Nonconsumer ware and other

   3,802     4,896     5,455  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Glassware and Candles

  $152,106    $142,422    $167,090  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,165,909    $1,131,359    $1,089,946  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Corporate Expenses–include various expenses of a general corporate nature, as well as costs related to

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

certain divested or closed nonfood operations, including the expense associated with retirement plans applicable to those closed units. These corporate expenses are generally not directly attributable to the reportable operating segments and therefore have not been allocated to those segments.

The following sets forth certain additional financial information attributable to our reportable segments for the years ended June 30 and certain items retained at the corporate level:

   2013  2012  2011 

Net Sales

    

Specialty Foods

  $1,013,803   $988,937   $922,856  

Glassware and Candles

   152,106    142,422    167,090  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $1,165,909   $1,131,359   $1,089,946  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating Income(1)

    

Specialty Foods

  $165,710   $151,479   $155,218  

Glassware and Candles

   7,983    2,105    3,764  

Corporate Expenses

   (11,787  (10,297  (11,978
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $161,906   $143,287   $147,004  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Identifiable Assets(2)

    

Specialty Foods

  $392,494   $384,604   $385,470  

Glassware and Candles

   79,568    85,714    87,452  

Corporate

   147,902    212,317    149,167  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $619,964   $682,635   $622,089  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Capital Expenditures

    

Specialty Foods

  $23,341   $15,080   $34,292  

Glassware and Candles

   687    841    948  

Corporate

   119    426    103  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $24,147   $16,347   $35,343  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Depreciation and Amortization

    

Specialty Foods

  $17,469   $17,512   $15,435  

Glassware and Candles

   2,497    2,677    3,427  

Corporate

   148    77    78  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $20,114   $20,266   $18,940  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Operating income represents net sales less operating expenses related to the business segments. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated, and intersegment revenues are not significant.
(2)Identifiable assets for each segment include those assets used in its operations and intangible assets allocated to purchased businesses. Corporate assets consist principally of cash and equivalents, prepaid Federal, state and local income taxes and deferred income taxes.

Combined net sales from the two segments attributable to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) for each of the years ending June 30 were as follows:

   2013  2012  2011 

Net sales to Wal-Mart

  $256,053   $238,719   $243,064  

As a percentage of consolidated net sales

   22  21  22

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Tabular amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Combined accounts receivable for the two segments attributable to Wal-Mart at June 30 as a percentage of consolidated accounts receivable were as follows:

   2013  2012 

Accounts receivable due from Wal-Mart as a percentage of consolidated accounts receivable

   35%   41

Specialty Foods segment net sales attributable to McLane Company, Inc., a wholesale distribution subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., for the year ended June 30, 2013 were approximately $132.9 million, or approximately 11% of consolidated net sales.

Note 1315 – Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

   First
Quarter
   Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
   Fourth
Quarter
   Fiscal Year 

2013

         

Net Sales

  $290,976    $326,155   $279,511    $269,267    $1,165,909  

Gross Margin

  $65,717    $81,656   $58,824    $60,912    $267,109  

Net Income

  $26,662    $35,277   $21,833    $25,477    $109,249  

Diluted Net Income per Share(1)

  $0.98    $1.28   $0.80    $0.93    $3.99  
   First
Quarter
   Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
   Fourth
Quarter
   Fiscal Year 

2012

         

Net Sales

  $274,516    $311,786   $271,098    $273,959    $1,131,359  

Gross Margin

  $55,430    $69,859   $53,802    $61,020    $240,111  

Net Income

  $21,258    $30,373(2)  $18,222    $25,955    $95,808  

Diluted Net Income per Share(1)

  $0.78    $1.11(2)  $0.67    $0.95    $3.51  

 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 Fiscal Year
2016         
Net Sales$294,085
 $324,769
 $287,765
 $284,490
 $1,191,109
Gross Profit$67,967
 $83,594
 $72,924
 $75,144
 $299,629
Net Income$27,628
 $34,511
 $29,011
 $30,614
 $121,764
Diluted Net Income Per Common Share (1)
$1.01
 $1.25
 $1.06
 $1.12
 $4.44
          
 
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
 Fiscal Year
2015         
Net Sales$259,987
 $303,411
 $263,400
 $277,716
 $1,104,514
Gross Profit$57,424
 $78,653
 $56,625
 $64,990
 $257,692
Net Income$22,761
 $32,954
 $20,403
 $25,568
 $101,686
Diluted Net Income Per Common Share (1)
$0.83
 $1.20
 $0.75
 $0.93
 $3.72
(1)Diluted net income per common share amounts are calculated independently for each of the quarters presented. Accordingly, the sum of the quarterly net income per common share amounts may not agree with the fiscal year.
(2)Included in the second quarter earnings is income of approximately $1.8 million, net of taxes, or approximately $.06 per share, related to funds received under CDSOA.

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure



Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures


Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management must apply its judgment in evaluating the cost–benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required by Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2013.

2016.

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT

Internal control over financial reporting refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that:

1.Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

2.Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and our directors; and

3.Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of an unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is only possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Management has used the framework set forth in the report entitledInternal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) (2013) published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the most recent year.
Our internal control over financial reporting has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued a report onan independent registered public accounting firm. Their opinion, as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Thisreporting, is stated in their report, which is set forth on the following page.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Lancaster Colony Corporation

Columbus, Ohio
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Lancaster Colony Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2013,2016, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company'scompany’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company'scompany’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013,2016, based on the criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended June 30, 2013,2016, of the Company and our report dated August 29, 2013,24, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio

August 29, 2013

Item 9B.Other Information

24, 2016



Item 9B. Other Information
None.


PART III

Item 10.

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information regarding our directors and executive officers, including the identification of the Audit Committee and the Audit Committee financial expert, is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our definitive proxy statement for our November 20132016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“20132016 Proxy Statement”).

to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act.

The information regarding Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting compliance is incorporated by reference to the material under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our 20132016 Proxy Statement.

The information regarding changes, if any, in procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20132016 Proxy Statement.

The information regarding our Code of Business Ethics is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20132016 Proxy Statement.

Item 11.Executive Compensation


Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information regarding executive officer and director compensation is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20132016 Proxy Statement.

The information regarding Compensation Committee interlocks and insider participation and the Compensation Committee Report is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20132016 Proxy Statement.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters


Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20132016 Proxy Statement.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence


Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information regarding certain relationships and related transactions and director independence is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20132016 Proxy Statement.

Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services


Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Information regarding fees paid to and services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm during the fiscal years ended June 30, 20132016 and 20122015 and the pre-approval policies and procedures of the Audit Committee is incorporated by reference to the information contained in our 20132016 Proxy Statement.



PART IV

Item 15.

Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) (1)Financial Statements. The following consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 20132016 and 20122015 and for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2013,2016, together with the report thereon of Deloitte & Touche LLP dated August 29, 2013,24, 2016, are included in Item 8 of this report:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 20132016 and 2012

2015

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011

2014

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011

2014

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011

2014

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended June 30, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011

2014

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(a) (2)Financial Statement Schedules.Included in Part IV of this report is the following additional financial data that should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this report:

Schedule II- Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

Supplemental schedules not included with the additional financial data have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(a) (3)Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and Item 15(b15(b). See Index to Exhibits following “Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.”


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION
(Registrant)
By:LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION
(Registrant)
 
By:/s/ JOHNJOHN B. GERLACH, JR.GERLACH, JR.
 John B. Gerlach, Jr.
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
 President and Director
Date:August 29, 201324, 2016

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures

 

Title

 

Date

SignaturesTitleDate
/S/ JOHNs/ JOHN B. GERLACH, JR.GERLACH, JR.  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer August 29, 201324, 2016
John B. Gerlach, Jr.  Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director 
  (Principal Executive Officer) 
/S/ JOHN L. BOYLANs/ DOUGLAS A. FELL  Treasurer, Vice President, August 29, 201324, 2016
John L. BoylanDouglas A. Fell  Assistant Secretary 
  and Chief Financial Officer and Director 
  (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) 
/S/ JAMESs/ JAMES B. BACHMANNBACHMANN  Director August 21, 201317, 2016
James B. Bachmann   
/S/ NEELI BENDAPUDIs/ NEELI BENDAPUDI  Director August 22, 201312, 2016
Neeli Bendapudi   
/S/ KENNETH L. COOKEs/ WILLIAM H. CARTER  Director August 21, 201317, 2016
William H. Carter
/s/ KENNETH L. COOKEDirectorAugust 17, 2016
Kenneth L. Cooke   
/S/ ROBERTs/ ROBERT L. FOXFOX  Director August 21, 201317, 2016
Robert L. Fox   
/S/ ALANs/ ALAN F. HARRISHARRIS  Director August 21, 201317, 2016
Alan F. Harris   
/S/ EDWARD H. JENNINGSs/ ROBERT P. OSTRYNIEC  Director August 21, 201317, 2016
Edward H. JenningsRobert P. Ostryniec   
/S/ ZUHEIR SOFIAs/ ZUHEIR SOFIA  Director August 21, 201317, 2016
Zuheir Sofia   


LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE II. VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

For each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 20132016

Column A

  Column B   Column C   Column D   Column E 

Description

  Balance at
Beginning
of Year
   Additions
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
   Deductions (A)   Balance at
End of  Year
 

Reserves deducted from asset to which they apply - Allowance for doubtful accounts (amounts in thousands):

        

Year Ended June 30, 2011

  $516    $65    $11    $570  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Year Ended June 30, 2012

  $570    $128    $20    $678  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Year Ended June 30, 2013

  $678    $178    $34    $822  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note:


Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E
Description Balance at Beginning of Year Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses Additions Charged to Other Accounts (A) Deductions (B) Balance at End of Year
Reserves deducted from asset to which they apply - Allowance for doubtful accounts (amounts in thousands):          
Year Ended June 30, 2014 $340
 $96
 $
 $4
 $432
Year Ended June 30, 2015 $432
 $(263) $41
 $4
 $206
Year Ended June 30, 2016 $206
 $(10) $
 $71
 $125
Notes:
(A)Represents balance acquired in 2015 acquisition of Flatout.
(B)Represents uncollectible accounts written-off net of recoveries.





LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-K

JUNE 30, 20132016

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit
Number

  

Description

 
2.1Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2015 by and among T. Marzetti Company, as Buyer, Flatout Holdings, Inc., as the Company, the shareholders of the Company, as Sellers, and NCP-Flatout Seller Rep LLC as Sellers’ Representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (000-04065), filed March 16, 2015).
2.2First Amendment, dated as of September 30, 2015, to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2015, by and among T. Marzetti Company, as Buyer, Flatout Holdings, Inc., as the Company, the shareholders of the Company, as Sellers, and NCP-Flatout Seller Rep LLC, as Sellers’ Representative (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (000-04065), filed November 3, 2015).
2.3Asset Purchase Agreement Between Lancaster Colony Corporation and CL Products International, LLC, dated as of January 30, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (000-04065), filed January 30, 2014).
3.1  Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Lancaster Colony Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (000-04065), filed February 9, 2009).
3.2  Amended and Restated Regulations of Lancaster Colony Corporation, dated as of April 18, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23.1 to the QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q8-K (000-04065), filed February 9, 2009)April 19, 2016).
4.1  Specimen Certificate of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (000-04065), filed August 25, 2010)28, 2015).
4.2Description of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (000-04065), filed October 29, 2015).
10.1  Credit Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2012, by and8, 2016, among Lancaster Colony Corporation, the Lenders, (as defined therein)The Huntington National Bank as Syndication Agent and JPMorgan Chase Bank, NAN.A. as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (000-04065), filed April 23, 2012)11, 2016).
10.2(a)
  Lancaster Colony Corporation Executive Employee Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (000-04065), filed September 26, 2000).
10.3(a)
  2004 Amendment to Lancaster Colony Corporation Executive Employee Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (000-04065), filed January 3, 2005).
10.4(a)
  Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Executive Employee Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (000-04065), filed February 25, 2005).
10.5(a)
Lancaster Colony Corporation 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement (000-04065), filed October 9, 2015).
10.6(a)
  Lancaster Colony Corporation Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (000-04065), filed November 19, 2010).
10.610.7(a)
  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Directors under the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.2 to the QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q8-K (000-04065), filed February 9, 2011)November 17, 2015).
10.710.8(a)
  Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Award Agreement for employeesEmployees and consultantsConsultants under the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q(000-04065), filed May 10, 2011)3, 2016).
10.810.9(a)
  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for employeesEmployees and consultantsConsultants under the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q(000-04065), filed May 10, 2011).
10.9(a)Amended and Restated Key Employee Severance Agreement, dated December 3, 2008, between Lancaster Colony Corporation and John L. Boylan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (000-04065), filed February 9, 2009)May 3, 2016).
10.10(a)
  Amended and Restated Key Employee Severance Agreement, dated December 3, 2008, between Lancaster Colony Corporation and Bruce L. Rosa (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (000-04065), filed February 9, 2009).

Exhibit
Number
Description
10.11(a)
  Description of Executive Bonus Arrangements (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (000-04065), filed September 10, 2004).
21
10.12(a)
Employment Agreement, dated April 18, 2016, between Lancaster Colony Corporation and David A. Ciesinski (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (000-04065), filed April 19, 2016).
10.13(a)
Lancaster Colony Corporation Form of Change in Control Agreement, dated April 18, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (000-04065), filed April 19, 2016).
21*  Subsidiaries of Registrant.
2323*  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Firm.

Exhibit
Number

 

Description

  31.131.1*  Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  31.231.2*  Certification of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  3232**  Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS101.INS*  XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH101.SCH*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL101.CAL*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF101.DEF*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB101.LAB*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE101.PRE*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(a)

(a)Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement in which any Director or any Executive Officer participates.

*Filed herewith
**Furnished herewith

67


57