UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

 

 

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20132016

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 001-34504

 

 

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware 20-5340172

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

2401 South Plum Grove2300 Warrenville Road

Palatine, Illinois 60067Downers Grove, IL 60515

(Address of principal executive offices)

(847) 303-5300630-296-3400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

 

Name of each Exchange on which Registered

Common Stock, par value $0.001

 The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b)12(g) of the Act:

None

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x.☒.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x.☒.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No   ¨.☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  ¨

  

Accelerated filer  x

Non-accelerated filer  ¨

  

Smaller reporting company  ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the last sale price on The NASDAQ Global Market on June 28, 201330, 2016 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $112,336,629.$129,127,802.

As of March 10, 2014,1, 2017, there were 10,912,97311,529,535 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (which is expected to be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s 20132016 fiscal year) are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I

   2 

Item 1.

  

Business

   2 

Item 1A.

  

Risk Factors

   15 

Item 1B.

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

   31 

Item 2.

  

Properties

   31 

Item 3.

  

Legal Proceedings

   31 

Item 4.

  

Mine Safety Disclosures

   3132 

PART II

   3233 

Item 5.

  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   3233 

Item 6.

  

Selected Financial Data

   3335 

Item 7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   3840 

Item 7A.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

   5659 

Item 8.

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   5659 

Item 9.

  

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   5659 

Item 9A.

  

Controls and Procedures

   56

Item 9B.

Other Information

5960 

PART III

   6063 

Item 10.

  

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

   6063 

Item 11.

  

Executive Compensation

   6063 

Item 12.

  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   6063 

Item 13.

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

   6063 

Item 14.

  

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   6063 

PART IV

   6164 

Item 15.

  

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

   6164 


SPECIAL CAUTION CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

When included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or in other documents that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or in statements made by or on behalf of the Company, words like “believes,” “belief,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “projects,” “estimates,” “may,” “might,” “would,” “should” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described therein. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to the following: changes in operational and reimbursement processes at the state level, changes in Medicaid, Medicare and other medical payment levels, changes in or our failure to comply with existing Federalfederal and Statestate laws or regulations or the inability to comply with new government regulations on a timely basis, competition in the home and community basedpersonal care service industry, the geographical concentration of our affiliated operations, changes in the case mix of consumers and payment methodologies, operational changes resulting from the assumption by managed care organizations of responsibility for managing and paying for home and community basedpersonal care services to consumers, changes in estimates and judgments associated with critical accounting policies, our ability to maintain or establish new referral sources, our ability to renew significant agreements or groups of agreements, our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, city and state minimum wage pressure, changes in payments and covered services due to the overall economic downturnconditions and deficit spending by Federalfederal and Statestate governments, future cost containment initiatives undertaken by third party payors, our ability to access to financing due to the volatility and disruption ofthrough the capital and credit markets, our ability to meet debt service requirements and comply with covenants in debt agreements, business disruptions due to natural disasters or acts of terrorism, our ability to integrate and manage our information systems, our expectations regarding the size and growth of the market for our services, the acceptance of privatized social services, our expectations regarding changes in reimbursement rates, authorized hours and eligibility standards ofand limits on services imposed by state governmental agencies, the potential to settlefor litigation, and the effect of those changes on our results of operations in 2013 or for periods thereafter, our ability to successfully implement our coordinatedpersonal care model to grow our business, our ability to attract referrals, our ability to continue identifying, pursuing and pursuingintegrating acquisition opportunities and expand into new geographic markets, the impact of acquisitions on our business, the effectiveness, quality and cost of our services and various other matters, many of which are beyond our control.

Because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified, you should not rely on any forward-looking statement as a prediction of future events. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking and we do not intend to release publicly any updates or changes in our expectations concerning the forward-looking statements or any changes in events, conditions or circumstances upon which any forward-looking statement may be based, except as required by law. For a discussion of some of the factors discussed above as well as additional factors, see Part I, Item 1A—“Risk Factors” and Part II, Item 7—“Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” within “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

Unless otherwise provided, “Addus,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” refer to Addus HomeCare Corporation and our consolidated subsidiaries and “Holdings” refers to Addus HomeCare Corporation. When we refer to 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, we mean the twelve month period then ended December 31, unless otherwise provided.

A copy of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20132016 as filed with the SEC, including all exhibits, is available on our internet website at http://www.addus.com on the “Investor Relations”“Investor” page link. Information contained on, or accessible through, our website is not a part of, and is not incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PART I

 

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

Overview

We operate as one business segment and are a comprehensive provider of home and community basedcomprehensive personal care services, which are primarily social in nature and areprincipally provided in the home, and focused on the dual eligible population.home. Our services include personal care andservices provide assistance with activities of daily living, and adult day care.living. Our consumers are individuals with special needsprimarily persons who are at risk of hospitalization or institutionalization, such as the elderly, chronically ill and disabled. Our payor clients include federal, state and local governmental agencies, managed care organizations, commercial insurers and private individuals. As of December 31, 2016, we provided personal care services to over 33,000 consumers through 114 locations across 24 states, including three adult day services centers in Illinois. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we served approximately 50,000, 48,000, and 43,000 discrete consumers, respectively.

A summary of our financial results for 2016, 2015 and 2014 is provided in the table below:

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2016   2015   2014 
   (Amounts in Thousands) 

Net service revenues – continuing operations

  $400,688   $336,815   $312,942 

Net service revenues – discontinued operations

   —      —      —   

Net income from continuing operations

   11,927    11,353    11,963 

Earnings from discontinued operations

   97    270    280 

Net income

  $12,024   $11,623   $12,243 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $231,030   $185,797   $180,803 

Our services are predominantly provided in the home under agreements with state and local government agencies. Our consumers are predominately “dual eligible,” meaning they are eligible to receive both Medicare and Medicaid benefits. The federal government permits states to initiate dual eligible demonstration programs and other managed Medicaid initiatives designed to coordinate the services provided through Medicare and Medicaid, with the overall objective of improving care quality and reducing costs. States are increasingly implementing managed care programs to deliver care for Medicaid enrollees. Managed care organizations have an economic incentive to better manage the healthcare expenditures of their membership, and therefore seek to provide care in a more cost-effective setting, such as a patient’s home. Managed care revenues account for 26.1%, 18.3% and 9.1% of our revenue mix for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The personal care services we provide include assistance with bathing, grooming, oral care, skincare, assistance with feeding and dressing, medication reminders, meal planning and preparation, housekeeping and transportation services and other activities of daily living. We provide these non-medical services on a long-term, continuous basis, with an average duration of approximately 26 months per consumer.

Our model is designed to improve consumer outcomes and satisfaction, as well as lower the cost of acute care treatment and reduce service duplication. We believe our model to be especially valuable to managed care organizations that have economic responsibility for both personal care services as well as acute care expenditures. Over the long term, we believe our model will be a differentiator and as a result we expect to receive increased referrals from managed care organizations.

We utilize home care aides to observe and community basedreport changes in the condition of our consumers for the purpose of early intervention in the disease process, with the goal of reducing the cost of medical services by preventing unnecessary emergency room visits and/or hospital admissions and re-admissions. We coordinate the services provided by our team with those of other healthcare agencies as appropriate. Changes in consumers’ conditions are evaluated by appropriately trained managers and may result in the condition being reported to the consumers’ case manager at the managed care organization or other payor, in some cases to the consumers’ primary care

physicians for treatment or other follow-up. We believe this approach to the care of our consumers and the integration of our services into the broader healthcare continuum are attractive to managed care organizations and other payors who are ultimately responsible for the healthcare needs and costs of our consumers.

We utilize Interactive Voice Response (“IVR”) systems and smart phone applications to communicate with our home care aides. Through these technologies, we are able to identify changes in health conditions with automated alerts forwarded to an appropriate manager for triage and evaluation. In addition, we use technology to record basic transaction information about each visit, record start and end times for a scheduled shift, track mileage reimbursement, send text messages to the home care aide and communicate basic payroll information.

In addition to our focus on organic growth, we have grown through over 121 locations across 21 statesselective acquisitions which have expanded our presence in current markets or which have facilitated our entry into new markets where the personal care business has been moving to over 26,000 consumers.managed care organizations. We completed seven acquisitions during the period from December 2013 through December 2016.

Effective March 1, 2013, we sold substantially all of the assets used in our home health business (the “Home Health Business”) in Arkansas, Nevada and South Carolina, and 90% of the Home Health Business in California and Illinois, to subsidiaries of LHC Group, Inc. (the “Purchasers”(“the Purchasers”) for a cash purchase price of approximately $20$20.0 million. We retained a 10% ownership interest in the Home Health Business in California and Illinois. The assets sold included 19 home health agencies and two hospice agencies in five states. EffectiveOn December 30, 2013, we sold one home health agency in Pennsylvania for approximately $0.2 million. Through home health agencies, we previously provided physical, occupational and speech therapy, as well as skilled nursing services, to pediatric, adult infirm and elderly patients. The results of the Home Health Business sold and one additional agency in Idaho which was closed in November 2012, are reflected as discontinued operations for all periods presented herein. Continuing operations include the results of operations previously included in our home & community segment and three agencies previously included in our home health segment. Following the sale of the Home Health Business, we managehave managed and internally reportreported our business in one segment.

We believemaintain licensure as a home health agency in Delaware and, in order to provide personal care services in the salestate, provide limited home health services reimbursable by Medicare. Until ceasing business in the State of theIndiana on August of 2015, we also provided limited home health services reimbursable by Medicare in order to comply with regulatory requirements that personal care services be provided by a licensed home health agency. Priority Home Health Business substantially positions us for future growth. The sale allows us to focus both management and financial resources to address changesCare, located in the home and community based services industry and to address the needs of managed care organizations as they become responsible for the state sponsored programs. We completed two acquisitionsOhio, also maintains enrollment in, 2013 and January 2014 which expand our presence in two existing markets and provide us with a base of operations in two new targeted managed care states. We have improved our financial performance by lowering our administrative costs and concentrating our efforts on the business that is growing and providing all of our profitability and disposing of the business that was unprofitable. We have improved our overall financial position by eliminating our debt and adding substantial amounts in cash reserves to our balance sheet. A summary of our results for 2013, 2012 and 2011, expressed in thousands, are provided in the table below:

   2013   2012  2011 

Net service revenues – continuing operations

  $265,941    $244,315   $230,105  

Net service revenues – discontinued operations

   6,462     38,822    42,995  

Net income from continuing operations

   11,163     9,288    8,412  

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations

   7,982     (1,653  (10,393

Net income (loss)

  $19,145    $7,635   $(1,981
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $163,934    $149,857   $154,692  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

The home and community based services we provide are primarily social in nature and include assistance with bathing, grooming, dressing, personal hygiene and medication reminders, and other activities of daily living. We provide these services on a long-term, continuous basis, with an average duration of approximately 17 months per consumer. Our adult day centers provide a comprehensive program of skilled and support services and designated medical services for adults in a community-based group setting. Services provided by our adult day centers include social activities, transportation services to andbut does not derive significant revenues from the centers, the provision of meals and snacks, personal care and therapeutic activities such as exercise and cognitive interaction.

We utilize a coordinated care model that is designed to enhance consumer outcomes and satisfaction as well as lower the cost of acute care treatment and reduce service duplication. Through our coordinated care model, we utilize our home care aides to observe and report changes in the condition of our consumers for the purpose of early intervention in the disease process, thereby preventing or reducing the cost of medical services by avoiding emergency room visits, and/or reducing the need for hospitalization. These changes in condition are evaluated by appropriately trained managers and referred to appropriate medical personnel including the primary care physicians and managed care plans for treatment and follow-up. We will coordinate the services provided by our team with those of selected health care agencies as appropriate. We believe this approach to the provision of care to our consumers and the integration of our services into the broader healthcare industry is particularly attractive to managed care providers and others who are ultimately responsible for the healthcare needs of our consumers and over time will increase our business with them.Medicare.

Addus HomeCare Corporation was incorporated in Delaware in 2006 under the name Addus Holding Corporation for the purpose of acquiring Addus HealthCare, Inc. (“Addus HealthCare”). Addus HealthCare was founded in 1979. Our principal executive offices are located at 2401 South Plum2300 Warrenville Road, Downers Grove, Road, Palatine, Illinois 60067.60615. Our telephone number is (847) 303-5300.630-296-3400. Our internet address is www.addus.com. Through our website, we make available, free of charge, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish such information to the SEC.

Our Market and Opportunity

We provide home and community basedpersonal care services to the elderly and other adult infirm adults who needrequire long-term care and assistance with essential, routine tasksactivities of life.daily living. In recent years, home and community-based services (“HCBS”), including personal care services, have grown in significance and demand. This trend is expected to continue as a result of the aging of the U.S. population, increased life expectancy, and increased opportunities for individuals to receive home-based care as an alternative to institutionalization. The Kaiser Commission report onPatient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, “ACA”), made available financial incentives through 2015 for state Medicaid programs that expanded HCBS as an alternative to nursing homes and the uninsured dated December 2012 estimated totalother institutional long-term care alternatives.

In calendar year 2015, reported federal and state Medicaid expenditures for home and community basedfee-for-service personal care services in 2009amounted to be over $50.0$15 billion, annually, up from $19.4 billion in 2000, with an average annual increase of 11%$2.3 billion from 2012. Federal and state governments spent approximately $152 billion on Medicaid long-term services and supports (“LTSS”) in federal fiscal year 2014, a 4% increase over 2013, with growth primarily attributable to HCBS.

Many states use both fee-for-service and managed care delivery models for personal care services, but the number of beneficiaries served through managed care has grown. Between federal fiscal years 2013 and 2014, LTSS spending within Medicaid managed care programs grew at a rate of 55%. OverAs of July 2016, 39 states contracted with risk-based managed care organizations to serve their Medicaid enrollees, with 13 of those states enrolling at least 75% of all elderly beneficiaries or those with disabilities in managed care organizations. In 23 states, some or all LTSS was provided through a managed care arrangement, and several states anticipate expanding these models geographically or to new populations in 2017. As of federal fiscal year 2016, the same period, participants inCenters for Medicare & Medicaid homeServices (“CMS”) requires states to identify and community based services increased from 2.1 million to 3.3 million.estimate their institutional and HCBS expenditures within Medicaid managed care.

In addition to the projected growth of government-sponsored home and community basedpersonal care services, the private dutypay market for our services is growing rapidly.continuing to expand. We provide our private dutypay consumers with all of the same services we provide to our government-sponsored home and community basedpersonal care consumers.

Historically, there were limited barriers to entry in the home and community basedpersonal care services industry. As a result, the home and community basedpersonal care services industry developed in a highly fragmented manner, with many small local providers. Few companies have a significant market share across multiple regions or states. AccordingThe lack of licensure or certification requirements in some states makes it difficult to the National Association for Home Care & Hospice, or NAHC, as of 2013, there were over 33,000 homecare and hospice agencies in the United States. Approximately 15,000 were Medicare-certified homecare and hospice agencies, while the remaining 18,000 representestimate the number of licensedpersonal care services agencies. However, projections published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2016 indicate that social workers and home health and community basedpersonal care aides are among the long-term care services agencies inoccupations that will grow the United States providing services similar to those we provide. In addition, while difficult to estimate, there are many non-licensed, non-certified home and community based services agencies.most by 2030.

More recently, the home and community basedThe personal care services industry has beenbecome subject to increased regulation. At the federal level, recent efforts have focused on improved coordination of regulation across the various types of Medicaid programs through which personal care services are offered. In several states, providers are now required to obtain state licenses or registrations and must comply with laws and regulations governing standards of practice. Providers must dedicate substantial resources to ensure continuing compliance with all applicable regulations and significant expenditures may be necessary to offer new services or to expand into new markets. Any failure to comply with this growing and changingthe regulatory regime could lead to the termination of rights to participate in federal and state-sponsored programs and the suspension or revocation of licenses. We believe limitationscompliance with new licensing requirements or regulations, the increasing focus on the availability of new licenses,improving health outcomes, the rising cost and complexity of operations and pressure on reimbursement rates due to constrained government resources may create barriersdiscourage for new providers and may encourage industry consolidation.

The Federal Coordinated Health CareMedicare-Medicaid Coordination Office was established pursuant to the ACA to effectively integrate benefitsimprove services for consumers who are enrolled ineligible for both Medicare and Medicaid, also known as dual eligibles, and improve coordination between the federal and state governments to ensure that dual eligibles have full access toin the delivery of items and services to which they are entitled. Stated goals ofThe Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office within the Federal Coordinated Health Care Office are to ensure that the dual eligible population has full access to seamless high quality health care and to make the system as cost-effective as possible. The Federal Coordinated Health Care OfficeCMS, works with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), state Medicaid agencies, and other federal and state agencies, as well as physicians and others, to providemake available technical assistance and educational tools to improve care coordination between Medicare and Medicaid, and to reduce costs and improve beneficiary experience while reducing administrative and educate dual eligibles regardingregulatory barriers between the programs. For example, the Financial Alignment Initiative is a demonstration project that tests capitated models and managed fee-for-service models of integrated care coverage. It also performs policy and program analysis and develops policy and program recommendations regardingpayment for benefits provided to dual eligibles.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, both laws Nationally, 13 states are referred to herein as the “Health Reform Act”), encourages states to integrate the state managed Medicaid home and community based programs with managed Medicare programs. The objective of these initiatives is to enhance the coordination of benefits between the two programs and to lower overall costs. The integrated programs are being structured as three year pilots. Nationally, 34 states have initiated, or plan to initiate, efforts to pursue these programs,currently participating in this initiative, including 157 of the 2124 states in which we provide services.

We believe that our coordinatedpersonal care program makesand our technology make us well-suited to partner with managed care providersorganizations to address the needs of the dual eligible population. These programs will eliminatereduce service duplication between home and community basedpersonal care programs and traditional Medicare home health. We believe that our ability to identify changes in medicalour consumers’ health and condition before the medical need requires acute intervention is required will lower the overall cost of care and will be recognized as an added benefit of our services.care. We believe this approach to the provision of care to our consumersdelivery and the integration of our services into the broader healthcare industry iscontinuum are particularly attractive to managed care providersorganizations and others who are ultimately responsible for the healthcare needs of our consumers and over time will increase our business with them.

Our Growth Strategy

Our ability to grow our net service revenues growth is closely correlated with the number of consumers to whom we provide our services. Our continued growth depends on our ability to provide consistently high quality care, maintain our existing payor client relationships, establish relationships with new payors enter into new contracts and increase our referral sources. Our continued growth is also dependent upon the authorization by state agencies of new consumers to receive our services. We believe there are several market opportunities for growth. The U.S. population of persons aged 65 and older is growing, and the U.S. Census Bureau estimates that this population will more than double by 2050. Additionally, we believe the overwhelming majority of individuals in need of care generally prefer to receive care in their homes or community-based settings.homes. Finally, we believe the provision of home and community basedpersonal care services is more cost-effective than the provision of similar services in an institutional setting for long-term care. The following are the key elements of our growth strategy:

 

  

Consistently provide high-quality care. We schedule our home care aides to perform their services at times mutually determined by our consumers. The home care aides are required to perform tasks as defined within the individual plan of care. We monitor the performance of our home care aides through regular supervisory visits in the homes of consumers.

Drive growth in existing marketsmarkets.. We intend to drive growthhave grown in our existing markets by enhancing the breadth of our services, increasing the number of referral sources and leveraging and expanding our payor relationships in each market. We expect to achievehave achieved this growth by continuing to educateeducating referral sources about the benefits of our services and maintaining our emphasis on high quality care for our consumers. To take advantage of the growing demand for quality and reputable home and community based services from private duty consumers, we are focusing on increasing and enhancing the private pay services we provide to consumers in all of our locations. By providing private duty services, we expect to increase our net service revenues without a corresponding increase in our operating costs.services.

 

  

ExpandMarket the benefits of our coordinatedpersonal care model to managed care organizations serving the dual eligible populations.. Our coordinatedpersonal care model provides significant opportunities to effectively market to a wide range of payor clients and referral sources, many of whom are responsible for consumers with both social and medical service needs. We intend to extend this model to all of our

markets. We are also seekingseek to partner with managed care providersorganizations to address the needs of the dual eligible population in light of governmental incentives for consumers to enroll in managed care plans. OurWe believe that our approach to the provision of care to our consumers and the integration of our services into the broader healthcare industry isare particularly attractive to managed care providersorganizations and others who are ultimately responsible for both the healthcare needs and related costs of our consumers and over time we believe will increase our business with them.consumers.

 

  

GrowthGrow through acquisitions. We intend to continue to grow with selective acquisitions. While entering new marketsOur strategy is a priority for our acquisitions, we are also looking for opportunities to expand within our existing markets and to enter new markets.

 

  

Expand into new markets organicallymarkets.. We intend to offer our services in geographic markets contiguous to our existing markets through de novo agency development. We also anticipate we will have opportunities to develop new agencies in response to requests from managed care organizations.

Our Services

We deliverAs of December 31, 2016, we delivered services to our consumers through 121114 individual agencies located in 2124 states and 5three adult day services centers in Illinois. Our home and community based services, assist consumers, who would otherwise be at risk of placement in a long-termwhich include non-medical care institution, with activities of daily living.

Services are primarily provided in consumers’ homes on an as-needed, hourly basis, mostly to older adults and younger disabled persons. These services, generally provided by home and community based service aides, are of a social rather than medical nature and includesuch as personal care home support services and adult day care.

Personal care and home support services, are provided to consumers who are unable to independently perform some or all of their activities of daily living. OurWithout our services, many of our consumers would be at risk of placement in a long-term care institution.

Personal care services are primarily provided to older adults and younger disabled persons in their homes on an as-needed, hourly basis. Typically provided by home care aides, our services are needed when assistance from family or community members is insufficient or wherewhen caregivers respite is needed.need respite. Personal care services include assistance with bathing, grooming, oral care, skincare, assistance with feeding and dressing, and medication reminders. Home support services includereminders, meal planning and preparation, housekeeping and transportation services.services and other activities of daily living. Many consumers need such services on a long-term basis to address chronic or acute conditions. Each payor client establishes its own eligibility standards, determines the type, amount, duration and scope of services,

and establishes the applicable reimbursement rate. Therate in accordance with applicable law, regulations or contracts. We provide personal care services for an average duration of our provision of home and community based services is approximately 1726 months per consumer.

WeAs of December 31, 2016, we also operate 5operated three adult day services centers in Illinois which providethat each provides a comprehensive program of skilled and support services and designatedcertain health services for adults in a community-based group setting. Services provided by our adult day centersThese services include social activities, transportation services to and from the centers, the provision of meals and snacks, personal care and therapeutic activities, such as exercise and cognitive interaction. In order to focus on providing services to consumers in their homes, effective March 1, 2017, Addus ceased the adult day services businesses and sold substantially all of the assets used in our adult day services centers.

Our payor clients are principally federal, state and local governmental agencies and managed care organizations. The federal, state and local programs under which these organizations operate are subject to legislative, budgetary and other risks that can influence reimbursement rates. Managed care organizations that operate as an extension of our state payors are subject to similar economic pressures. Our commercial insurance carrier payor clients are typically for profit companies and are continuously seeking opportunities to control costs.

Most of our services are provided pursuant to agreements with state and local governmental social and aging service agencies. These agreements generally have a statedan initial term of one to two years and may be terminated by the counterparty uponwith 60 days’ notice. They are typically renewed for one to five-year terms, provided that we have complied with licensing, certification and program standards, and other regulatory requirements. Reimbursement rates and methods vary by state and service type, but are typically based on an hourly or unit-of-service basis. Managed care organizations are becoming an increasing portion of our payor mix as states shift from the management of their programs to managed care organizations. In 2013,2016, approximately 94.1%70.4% of our net service revenues from continuing operations were derived from state and local government programs, with 26.1% derived from managed care organizations, while approximately 5.9%3.5% of net service revenues from continuing operations were derived from insurance programs and private dutypay consumers.

The following table presents our locations, setting forth acquisitions, start-ups, divestitures and closures for the period December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013. The table excludes locations associated with discontinued operations.

Total

Total December 31, 2011

107

Closed/Merged

(3

Total at December 31, 2012

104

Acquired

16

Start-up

2

Closed/Merged

(1

Total at December 31, 2013

121

Our payor clients are principally federal, state and local governmental agencies. The federal, state and local programs under which they operate are subject to legislative, budgetary and other risks that can influence reimbursement rates. Our commercial insurance carrier payor clients are typically for profit companies and are continuously seeking opportunities to control costs. We are seeking to grow our private duty business.

For 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, our revenue mix by payor type for continuing operations was as follows:

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2013  2012  2011 

State, local and other governmental programs

   94.1  94.9  93.5

Commercial

   2.0    1.0    1.3  

Private duty

   3.9    4.1    5.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   100.0  100.0  100.0
   Year Ended December 31, 
   2016  2015  2014 

State, local and other governmental programs

   70.4  77.7  86.4

Managed care organizations

   26.1   18.3   9.1 

Private pay

   2.4   3.0   3.4 

Commercial insurance

   1.1   1.0   1.1 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   100.0  100.0  100.0

We derive a significant amount of our net service revenues from our operations in Illinois, New York, New Mexico and California, which represented 66%Washington. The percentages of total revenue for each of these significant states for 2016, 2015 and 6%; 64% and 7% and 58% and 8% of our total net service revenues for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.2014 were as follows:

   % of Total Revenue for the
Years Ended December, 31
 

State

    2016      2015      2014   

Illinois

   53.6  59.5  60.6

New York

   12.9   —     —   

New Mexico

   7.5   8.5   8.2 

Washington

   4.5   4.9   5.0 

A significant amount of our net service revenues from continuing operations are derived from one specific payor client, the Illinois Department on Aging, which accounted for 59%42.1%, 57%48.8%, and 51%53.2% of our total net service revenues from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

We also measure the performance of our business through review of our billable hours per client, billable hours per business day, revenues per billable hour and the number of consumers served, or census.

Competition

The home and community basedpersonal care services industry is highly competitive, fragmented and market specific. Each local market has its own competitive profile and no single competitor has significant market share across all of our markets. Our competition consists of home and community basedpersonal care service providers, home health providers, private caregivers, larger publicly held companies, privately held companies, privately held single-site agencies, hospital-based agencies, not-for-profit organizations, community-based organizations, managed care organizations and self-directed care programs. In addition, certain governmental payors contract for services with independent providers such that our relationships with these payors are not exclusive. This is particularly true in California.California where individuals act as independent providers, meaning individuals provide services for a consumer and are paid directly by the county where services are delivered. We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, competition from new entrants into our markets. Increased competition may result in pricing pressures, loss of or failure to gain market share or loss of consumers or payors, any of which could harm our business. In addition, some of our competitors may have greater financial, technical, political and marketing resources and name recognition on a larger number ofwith consumers and payors than we do.payors.

Sales and Marketing

We focus on initiating and maintaining working relationships with state and local governmental agencies responsible for the provision of the services we offer. We target these agencies in our current markets and in geographical areas that we have identified as potential markets for expansion. We also seek to identify service needs or changes in the service delivery or reimbursement system of governmental entities and attempt to work with and provide input to the responsible government personnel, provider associations and consumer advocacy groups.

In many states there is a need toWe establish new referral relationships with various managed care plansorganizations who are contractingcontract with the states for the management of the state Medicaid programs under dual eligible demonstration and similar Medicaid managed care programs. We have met with allmany contracted managed care plansorganizations in markets where we serve our clients and believe we are beginning to build thosebuilding the relationships necessary to insureensure continued referrals of new clients.

We receive substantially all of our consumers fromthrough third-party referrals. Generally, family members of potential consumers are made aware of available in-home or alternative living arrangements through a state or local case management system. These systems are operated by governmental or private agencies. We receive referrals from state departments on aging, rehabilitation, mental health and children’s services, county departments of social services, the Veterans Health Administration and city departments on aging.

We provide ongoing education and outreach to our target communities bothin order to inform residentsthe community about state and locally-subsidized care options and to communicate our role in providing quality home and community basedpersonal care services. We also utilize consumer-direct sales, marketing and advertising programs designed to attract consumers.

Payment for Services

We are compensated for substantially all of our services by federal, state and local government programs, such as Medicaid funded programs and Medicaid waiver programs, other state agencies, the Veterans Health

Administration, managed care organizations, commercial insurersinsurance and private dutypay consumers. Depending on the type of service, coverage for services may be predicated on a case manager, physician or nurse determination that the care is necessary or on the development of a plan for care in the home.

The following table sets forth net service revenues from continuing operations derived from each of our major payors during the indicated periods as a percentage of total net service revenues from continuing operations.

 

   Year Ended December 31, 

Payor Group

  2013  2012  2011 

Illinois Department on Aging

   58.8  57.3  51.2

Washington Department of Social and Health Services

   6.6    6.4    6.7  

Riverside County Department of Public Social Services, CA

   3.8    3.9    4.5  

Nevada Medicaid

   3.4    3.9    5.1  

Private duty

   3.9    4.1    5.2  

Commercial insurance

   2.0    1.0    1.3  

Other federal, state and local payors

   21.5    23.4    26.0  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   100.0  100.0  100.0
   Year Ended December 31, 

Payor

  2016  2015  2014 

Illinois Department on Aging

   42.1  48.8  53.2

Other federal, state and local payors

   28.3   28.9   33.2 

Managed care organizations

   26.1   18.3   9.1 

Private pay

   2.4   3.0   3.4 

Commercial insurance

   1.1   1.0   1.1 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   100.0  100.0  100.0

Illinois Department on Aging

We provide home and community basedpersonal care services pursuant to agreements with the Illinois Department on Aging, which is funded by Medicaid and general revenue funds of the State of Illinois. Consumers are identified by case managers contracted independently with the Illinois Department on Aging. Once a consumer has been evaluated and determined to be eligible for the program, the case manager refers the consumer to a list of authorized providers, from which the consumer selects the provider. We provide our services in accordance with a care plan developed by the case manager and under administrative directives from the Illinois Department on Aging. We are reimbursed on an hourly fee for servicefee-for-service basis.

Due to its revenue deficiencies, and financing issues and delay in finalizing budgets, the State of Illinois is currently reimbursing usproviders on a delayed basis with respect to these agreements.basis. These payment delays have adversely impacted, and may furthercould adversely impact our liquidity and may result in the need to increase borrowings under our credit facility. Other delayedDelayed payor reimbursements from the State of Illinois have also contributedcould contribute to thean increase in our receivables balances.

Washington Department The State of SocialIllinois did not adopt a comprehensive budget for fiscal year 2016, which ended on June 30, 2016, and Health Services

We provide home and community based services pursuantit has not yet adopted a comprehensive budget for fiscal year 2017, which began on July 1, 2016. Stopgap budget legislation was enacted on June 30, 2016, which appropriated funds through December 31, 2016. Without a budget, the State is not authorized to agreements with the Washington Departmentpay for non-Medicaid consumers we serve. Non-Medicaid consumers from Illinois represent approximately 15% of Social and Health Services, which is funded by Medicaid and general revenue fundsour current total annual revenues. Our accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2016, increased 37.7% compared to 2015, due in part to delays from the State of Washington. Consumers are identified by area AgencyIllinois in the second half of 2016. Accounts receivable attributable to delayed payments from the Illinois Department on Aging case managers contracted independently with the Washington Department of Social and Health Services. Once a consumer has been evaluated and determined to be eligible for the program, the case manager refers the consumer to a list of authorized providers, from which the consumer selects the provider. We provide our services in accordance with a care plan developed by the case manager and under administrative directives from the Washington Department of Social and Health Services. We are reimbursed on an hourly fee for service basis.

Riverside County Department of Public Social Services

We provide services pursuant to an agreement with the County of Riverside, California under its In-Home Support Services Program. Under this agreement, we serve consumers referred to us by county-employed social workers in accordance with the term and conditions of a Quality Assurance Work Plan. We provide personal care and other assistance with activities of daily living under this program. All services are reimbursed on an hourly fee for service basis. The current agreement has a one year term beginning July 1, 2013. The County has offered a one year extension beginning July 1, 2014, which is subject to approval by the County department that oversees our agreement.

Our contract relationship with the County of Riverside, California may change beforetotaled $53.0 million at the end of the term of our agreement, including any renewal terms, as2016, approximately $36.8 million related to Non-Medicaid consumers and approximately $16.2 million related to Medicaid consumers. Reimbursements from the State of CaliforniaIllinois could be further delayed due to the lack of a budget for fiscal year 2017 and Riverside County are planning to enter into managed care demonstration plans whereby the services we provide to consumersbecause current forecasts indicate higher state deficits in the county would become the responsibility of the contracted managed care plans. The transition of consumers to managed care is expected to take place while our agreement with the County of Riverside is in place. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to contract with managed care plans at rates comparable to our current contract with the County or that all of our consumers would move to managed care or that the managed care plans would continue to utilize our services at the same rate that they are provided today.

Our arrangements with all of our California county payors are not exclusive in nature. Rather, each county is permitted to contract for services from independent providers with a registry of independent providers managed by the county authority. The independent provider programs represent a competitive threat to us but we believe independent providers do not provide the level of management or supervision that the counties, or the individuals receiving services would have if the contract were with us.

Nevada Medicaid

We provide services pursuant to an agreement with the State of Nevada Division of Health Care Financing and Policy under Nevada Medicaid’s Personal Care Options program. Under this agreement, we identify consumers through community outreach efforts, who are then qualified by the State of Nevada to receive services. We provide personal care and other in-home support services under this program. All services are reimbursed on an hourly fee for service basis.

Private Duty

Our private duty services are provided on an hourly basis. Our rates are established to achieve a pre-determined gross profit margin, and are competitive with those of other local providers. We bill our private duty consumers for services rendered either bi-monthly or monthly, and in certain circumstances we obtain a two-

week deposit from the consumer. Other private duty payors include workers’ compensation programs/insurance, preferred provider organizations and other managed care companies and employers.

Commercial Insurance

Many states are moving the administration of their Medicaid home and community based programs to commercial managed care insurance companies. This transition is in response to federal and state initiatives to address the needs of the dual eligible population and in an overall desire to better manage the costs of the Medicaid long term care programs. Reimbursement from the managed care companies is generally on an hourly, fee for service basis with rates consistent with the individual state funded rates.

Most long-term care insurance policies contain benefits for in-home services and adult day care. Policies are generally subject to dollar limitations on the amount of daily, weekly or monthly coverage provided. Depending on the type of service, coverage for services may be predicated on a physician or nurse determination that the care is necessary or on the development of a plan for care in the home.near future.

Other Federal, State and Local Payors

Medicaid Funded Programs and Medicaid Waiver Programs

Medicaid is a state-administered program that provides certain social and medical services to qualified low-income individuals and is jointly funded by the federal government and individual states. Reimbursement rates and methods vary by state and service type, but are typically based on an hourly or unit-of-service basis. Rates are subject to adjustment based on statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, government funding limitations and interpretations of policy by individual state agencies. Within guidelines established by federal

statutes and regulations, and subject to federal oversight, each state establishes its own eligibility standards, determines the type, amount, duration and scope of services, sets the rate of payment for services and administers its own program, subject to federal oversight.program. Most states cover Medicaid beneficiaries for intermittent home health services as well as continuous services for children and young adults with complicated medical conditions, and certain states cover home and community-based services.

Currently, personal care services and other HCBS are largely reimbursed on a fee-for-service basis. However, states may seek permission from CMS to provide personal care services under waivers of traditional Medicaid requirements. In an effort to control escalating Medicaid costs, states are increasingly requiring Medicaid beneficiaries to enroll in managed care plans. Under a health reform bill signed into law in January 2012, Illinois set a goal to increase the percentage of Medicaid beneficiaries in Medicaid managed care plans from the then current 8% to 50% by 2015. Under these programs, States are increasingly requiring Medicaidthat require beneficiaries to work with case managers. In 2012, Illinois enacted Medicaid legislation requiring that 50% of Medicaid beneficiaries be enrolled in some type of care coordination program by 2015. A report issued by the Illinois Department on Aging in 2016 indicates that over 60% of the state’s Medicaid population is enrolled in a care coordination program, many provided through various managed care entities including managed care organizations.

Veterans Health Administration

The Veterans Health Administration operates the nation’s largest integrated health carehealthcare system, with more than 1,8001,700 sites of care, and provides health carehealthcare benefits, including home and community basedpersonal care services, to eligible military veterans. The Veterans Health Administration provides funding to regional and local offices and facilities that support the in-home care needs of eligible aged and disabled veterans by contracting directly with local in-home care providers, and to the aid and attendance pension, which pays veterans for their otherwise unreimbursed health and long-term care expenses. We currently have relationships and agreements with the Veterans Health Administration to provide home and community basedpersonal care services in several states, with the most Veterans Health Administration services being provided to eligible consumers in Illinois, Arkansas and California.

Other

Other sources of funding are available to support home and community basedpersonal care services in different states and localities. In addition, many states appropriate general funds or special use funds through targeted taxes or lotteries to finance home and community basedpersonal care services for senior citizens and peopleindividuals with disabilities.

Depending on the state, these funds may be used to supplement existing Medicaid waiver programs or for distinct programs that serve non-Medicaid eligible consumers.

Managed Care Organizations

Many states are moving the administration of their Medicaid personal care programs to commercially managed care insurance companies. This transition is due to an overall desire to better manage the costs of the Medicaid long term care programs. Reimbursement from the managed care organizations is generally on an hourly, fee-for-service basis with rates consistent with the individual state funded rates.

Commercial Insurance

Most long-term care insurance policies contain benefits for in-home services and adult day services. Policies are generally subject to dollar limitations on the amount of daily, weekly or monthly coverage provided.

Private Pay

Our private pay services are provided on an hourly basis. Our rates are established to achieve a pre-determined gross profit margin, and are competitive with those of other local providers. We bill our private pay consumers for services rendered either bi-monthly or monthly, and in certain circumstances we obtain a two- week deposit from the consumer. Other private payors include workers’ compensation programs/insurance, preferred provider organizations and employers.

Exposure for Payments Previously Received

As described above under the caption “Business—Overview,” we sold our Home Health Business effective March 1, 2013, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 7, 2013 (the “Home Health Purchase Agreement”), with LHC Group, Inc. and the Purchasers identified therein. Pursuant to the Home Health Purchase Agreement, we retained a 10% ownership interest in the Home Health Business in California and Illinois. In addition, not included in the sale were four home health agencies in Delaware, Idaho, Indiana and Pennsylvania. The home health agency in Pennsylvania was sold on December 30, 2013, and the agency in Idaho was closed in November 2012, the agency in Indiana was closed August 2015 and efforts to sell the Idaho agency were abandoned in December 2013. Because regulatory requirements in Delaware and Indiana require the provision of home and community based services to be provided by a licensed home health agency, we will continue to provide limited home health services reimbursable by Medicare in these agencies in order to maintain these licenses.

While we no longer receive substantial payments from Medicare for home health services, pursuant to the Home Health Purchase Agreement, we are obligated to indemnify the Purchasers for, among other things, (i) penalties, fines, judgments and settlement amounts arising from a violation of certain specified statutes, including the False Claims Act, the Civil Monetary Penalties Law, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the Stark Law or any state law equivalent in connection with the operation of the Home Health Business prior to the consummation of the sale (the “Closing”), and (ii) any liability related to the failure of any reimbursement claim submitted to certain government programs for services rendered by the Home Health Business prior to the Closing to meet the requirements of such government programs, or any violation prior to the Closing of any health carehealthcare laws. Such liabilities include amounts to be recouped by, or repaid to, such government programs as a result of improperly submitted claims for reimbursement or those discovered as a result of audits by investigative agencies. All services that we have provided that have been or may be reimbursed by Medicare are subject to retroactive adjustments and/or total denial of payments received from Medicare under various review and audit provisions included in the program regulations. The review period is generally described as six years from the date the services are provided but could be expanded to ten years under certain circumstances if fraud is found to have existed at the time of original billing. In the event that there are adjustments relating to the period prior to the Closing, we may be required to reimburse the Purchasers for the amount of such adjustments.

Medicare is the U.S. government’s health insurance program funded by the Social Security Administration for individuals aged 65 or older, individuals under the age of 65 with certain disabilities and individuals of all ages with end-stage renal disease. Eligibility for Medicare does not depend on income, and coverage is restricted to reasonable and medically-necessary treatment.

Medicare home health rates are based on a Medicare episodic rate set annually through federal legislation.regulation. The rate covers a 60-day episode of care. Payment for each patient’s episode of care is based on the severity of the consumer’s condition, his or her service needs and other factors relating to the cost of providing services and supplies.

In addition, Medicare payments can be adjusted through changes in the payment rate and recoveries of overpayments for, among other things, unusually costly care for a particular consumer, low utilization, transfers to another provider, the level of therapy services required, the number of episodes of care provided, and if the consumer is discharged but readmitted within the same 60-day episodic period. In addition, Medicare can also reduce levels of reimbursement if a provider is unable to produce appropriate billing documentation or acceptable medical authorizations.

Insurance Programs and Costs

We maintain workers’ compensation, general and professional liability, automobile, directors’ and officers’ liability, fiduciary liability and excess liability insurance. We offer various health insurance plans to eligible full-time and part-time employees. We believe our insurance coverage and self-insurance reserves are adequate for our current operations. However, we cannot assure you that any potential losses or asserted claims will not exceed such insurance coverage and self-insurance reserves.

Employees

The following is a breakdown of our part- and full-time employees, as well as the employees in our National Support Center, as of December 31, 2013:2016:

 

  Full-time   Part-time   Total   Full-time   Part-time   Total 

Continuing Operations – Home and Community Based Services

   4,221     12,222     16,443  

Continuing Operations – Personal Care Services

   2,252    20,613    22,865 

National Support Center

   120     22     142     197    8    205 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
   4,341     12,244     16,585     2,449    20,621    23,070 

Our home and community based servicecare aides provide substantially all of our services and comprise approximately 95%97.9% of our total workforce. In most cases, our home and community based services aidesThey undergo a criminal background check, and are provided with pre-service training and orientation and an evaluation of their skills. In many cases, home and community based servicescare aides are also required to attend ongoing in-services education. In certain states, our home and community based servicescare aides are required to complete certified training programs and maintain a state certification; however, no state in which we operate requires home and community based services aides to maintain a license similar to that of a nurse or therapist.certification. Approximately 70%66.1% of our total employees are represented by labor unions. We maintain strong working relationships with these labor unions. We have a national agreement with the Service Employees International Union (the “SEIU”). Wages and benefits which is currently under negotiation, as well as numerous agreements with local SEIU affiliates which are negotiated at the local level at various times throughout the year.renegotiated from time to time.

Our Technology

We have licensed the Horizon Homecare software solution (“Horizon Homecare”) from McKesson Information Solutions, LLC or McKesson,(“McKesson”), to address our administrative, office, clinical and operating information system needs, including assisting with the compliance of our operating systems with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, requirements. Horizon Homecare assists our staff in gathering information to improve the quality of consumer care, optimize financial performance, adjust consumer mix, promote regulatory compliance and enhance staff efficiency. Horizon Homecare supports intake, personnel scheduling, office, clinical and reimbursement management in an integrated database. The Horizon Homecare software is hosted by McKesson in a secure data center, which provides multiple redundancies for storage, power, bandwidth and security. Using this technology, we are ableworking to standardize the care delivered across our network of locations and effectively monitor our performance and consumer outcomes. We have also leveraged this technology to implement a centralized billing and collections function at our national support center.

We have developed internally a customized payroll management system.licensed the QlikView Business Intelligence software to provide historical, current, and forward-looking operational performance to identify and create or improve our current business strategies. This systemsoftware has been utilizedintegrated with our Horizon platform to calculateprovide high level historical and producecurrent analytical views to measure performance and better understand the factors that are driving our payroll. Thiskey metrics in a real-time manner. We are also disseminating detailed visit information to line level management to identify clients where scheduling or visit activities are not on track to meet their servicing needs.

We currently use the Ultipro system by Ultimate Software to address our human resources and payroll processing needs. Ultimate is a web based provider of integrated human resource and payroll software, iswhich supports our management with the systems and reporting necessary to manage our employees. Both software systems are integrated with Horizon Homecare and other clinical data-management systems, and includes a featureinclude features for general ledger population, tax reporting, managing wage assignments and garnishments, on-site check printing, general ledger population and direct-deposit paychecks. Secure management reports are made available centrally and through our internal reporting module.

We have contractedmade the decision to replace this internalconvert our payroll system with an external vendorfrom Ultimate to ADP and we expect this conversion to be complete in 2017. ADP will reduce the current cost of a comprehensive HRIS/Payroll system.processing payroll while reducing issues and errors. We will be adding significant electronic support systems to our recruiting, human resources, payroll and accounting support functions. This conversion will solidify our ability to easily migrate acquired entities, improve compliance to state and regulatory requirements and supply needed self-service capabilities to various levels within the Company.

We

In some states, we utilize commercial vendors for electronic visit verification pursuant to which our home and community basedpersonal care service aidsaides record their beginning and ending times for services provided through either an interactive

voice recognition (IVR)IVR system or cell phone based system. We have supplemented these commercial systems withIn the fall of 2016, we transitioned all company developed smart phone applications that allow our homecare aides the abilityprovided mobile devices to communicate with our support center,CellTrak for all mobile and IVR traffic unless otherwise mandated by a state to request additional work if available, to monitor or change their schedules and to inquire about payroll information.utilize a specific technology.

Government Regulation

Overview

Our business is subject to extensive and increasing federal, state and local regulation. Changes in the lawlaws and regulations or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations may have a dramatic effectmaterial impact on the definition of permissible activities, the relative cost of doing business, and the methods and amounts of payment for care by both governmental and other payors. Departments of the federal government are currently considering how to implement programs and policy changes and mandated demonstration projects in the Health Reform Act. As a result of the Health Reform Act, it is expected that the number of Medicaid beneficiaries will increase (although several states in which we operate have declined to expand Medicaid eligibility) and in addition, there may be additional increases if employers terminate their employee health plans. It is impossible to know at this time what effect, if any, this will have on budgetary allocations for our services. The health care industry has experienced, and is expected to continue to experience, extensive and dynamic change. In addition, differences among state laws may impede our ability to expand into certain markets. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could suffer civil or criminal penalties, including the loss of our licenses to operate and our ability to participate in federal or state programs. In addition the healthcare industry has experienced, and is expected to continue to experience, extensive and dynamic change. It is difficult to predict the effect of these changes on budgetary allocations for our services. See also “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Overview.”

Medicaid Participation

To participate in and qualify for reimbursement under Medicaid programs, we are subject to various requirements imposed by federal and state authorities. If we were to violate the applicable federal and state regulations, we could be excluded from participation in federal and state healthcare programs and be subject to substantial civil and criminal penalties. Federal regulations set forth eligibility requirements for personal care services provided under Medicaid waiver programs. These regulations specify that home based settings must be integrated in and support full access to the greater community, be selected by individuals from among different setting options, ensure privacy rights of individuals, optimize autonomy and independence in making life choices, and facilitate individual choice regarding services and supports. We may face additional costs associated with compliance with these regulations, but these costs will vary from state to state, depending on how the requirements are implemented.

Health ReformAffordable Care Act

The Health Reform ActU.S. Congress and certain state legislatures have passed many laws and regulations in recent years intended to effect major change within the national healthcare system, the most prominent of which is the ACA. However, the future of the ACA is unclear following the 2016 federal elections. The new presidential administration and certain members of Congress have stated their intent to repeal or make significant changes to the ACA, its implementation or interpretation, but have not yet agreed upon specific proposals for replacement reforms. As currently structured, the ACA affects how healthcare services are delivered and reimbursed through the expansion of health insurance coverage, reduction of growth in Medicare program spending, and the establishment and expansion of programs that tie reimbursement to quality and integration. It includes several provisions that may affect reimbursement for our services. The Health Reform Act is broad, sweeping reform, and is subjectIt allows states to change, including through the adoption of related regulations, the way in which its provisions are interpreted and the manner in which it is enforced. Although the Health Reform Act provides for expansion ofexpand eligibility for Medicaid enrollment, 21enrollment. A number of states, including some in which we do business,operate, have opted not to participateparticipated in Medicaid expansion. Some of the states that did not expand Medicaid are evaluating or participating in an alternative waiver plan.

The Health Reform Act also createsACA established within CMS athe Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, or CMMI, to test innovative payment and service delivery systems to reduce program expenditures while maintaining or enhancing quality. AmongFor example, the issues that are to be addressed by CMMI are: allowing the states to testhas supported testing of new models of care for individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, supporting “continuing care hospitals” that offer post acute care during the 30 days following discharge,dual eligibles, funding of home health providers that offer chronic care management services, and establishingestablishment of pilot programs that bundle acute care hospital services with physician services and post-acute care services, includingwhich may include home health services for patients with certain selected conditions. We maypatients. These systems could have difficulty negotiating for a fair share of the bundled payment. In addition, we may be unfairly penalized if a consumer is readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge for reasons beyondmaterial impact on our control.

We cannot assure you that the provisions described above, or that any other provisions of the Health Reform Act, will not adversely impact our business, results of operations or financial position.business.

Permits and Licensure

Our home and community basedpersonal care services are authorized and / and/or licensed under various state and county requirements. OurAlthough our home and community basedcare aides are generally have nonot subject to licensure requirements, although in certain states they are requiredrequire them to complete training programs and maintain state certification. We believe we are currently licensed appropriately whereas required by the laws of the states in which we operate, but additional licensing requirements may be imposed upon us in existing markets or markets that we enter in the future. For example, California’s Home Care Services Consumer Protection Act was enacted in 2013. This statute establishes a licensing program for home care organizations and requires background checks, basic training, and tuberculosis screening for the aides that are employed by home care organizations. Compliance by home care organizations and aides was expected by January 2016. Although we sold the bulk of our home health business in California in March 2013, we continue to operate in California and are subject to ongoing costs under the statute.

Applicable FederalFraud and StateAbuse Laws

Anti-Kickback Laws: The federal government enforces the federal Anti-Kickback Law thatStatute prohibits the offer,offering, payment, solicitation or receipt of any remuneration to induce referrals or from any personorders for items or entity to induce or in exchange for the referral of patientsservices covered by federal health carehealthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. TheCourts have interpreted this statute broadly and held that there is a violation if just one purpose of the remuneration is to generate referrals. Knowledge of the law or intent to violate the law is not required. Violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Law also prohibitsStatute may be punished by criminal fines, imprisonment, significant civil monetary penalties and exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs. In addition, the purchasing, leasing, orderingsubmission of a claim for services or arranging for any item, facility or service covered byitems generated in violation of the government payment programs (orfederal Anti-Kickback Statute may be subject to additional penalties under the recommendation thereof) in exchange for such referrals.federal False Claims Act. Many states, including Illinois, Nevada and California also have similar laws proscribing kickbacks, some of which are not limited to servicesapply regardless of the source of payment for which government-funded payment may be made. Violations of these provisions are punishable by criminal fines, civil penalties, imprisonmentitems or exclusion from participation in reimbursement programs.services.

The Stark Law and other Prohibitions on Physician Self-Referral: We may also be affected by theThe federal law commonly known as the “Stark Law,” thatLaw” prohibits physicians from making a referral forreferring Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries to an entity that provides certain “designated health care items or services, including home health services, if they, or their family members, have a financial relationship with the entity receiving the referral, unless certain conditions are met.an exception applies. The Stark Law also prohibits entities that provide designated health services reimbursable by Medicare or Medicaid from billing these programs for any items or services that result from a prohibited referral and requires the entities to refund amounts received for items or services provided pursuant to a prohibited referral. Violations of the Stark Law may result in denial of payment, and are punishable by civil monetary penalties onand exclusion from federal healthcare programs of both the person making the referral and the provider rendering the service. Such personsFailure to refund amounts received as a result of a prohibited referral on a timely basis may constitute a false or entities are also subjectfraudulent claim, which may result in additional penalties imposed under the federal False Claims Act. We attempt to exclusion from federal and state healthcare programs. We believestructure our relationships, including compensation agreements with physicians who served as medical directors in our home health agencies, to meet the requirements for the personal servicesan exception and that our operations comply withto the Stark Law.

Law, but we cannot provide assurance that every relationship is fully compliant. Many states, including Illinois, Nevada and California have also enacted statutes similar in scope and purpose to the Stark Law.

Beneficiary Inducement Prohibition: The federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law (“CMPL”) imposes substantial penalties for offering remuneration or other inducements to influence federal health care beneficiaries’ decisions to seek specific governmentally reimbursable items or services, or to choose particular providers. The CMPL also can be used for civil prosecution of the Anti-Kickback Law. Sanctions under the CMPL include substantial financial penalties as well as exclusion from participation in all federal and state health care programs.

The False Claims Act: Numerous state and federal laws govern the submission of claims for reimbursement and prohibit false claims or statements. Under the federal False Claims Act, for example, the government may fine any person, company or corporation that knowingly submits, or participates in submitting, claims for payment to the federal government whichthat are false or fraudulent, or which contain false or misleading information. Any“Knowingly” is defined broadly, and includes submission of a claim with reckless disregard to its truth or falsity. The federal False Claims Act can be used to prosecute fraud involving issues such person or entity that knowingly makes or uses a false record or statement to avoid payingas coding errors and billing for services not provided. Violations of other statutes, such as the federal government mayAnti-Kickback Statute, can also serve as a basis for liability under the federal False Claims Act. Among other potential bases for liability is the knowing and improper failure to report and return overpayments received from Medicare or Medicaid in a timely manner following identification of the overpayment. An overpayment is deemed to be subject“identified” when a person has, or should have through reasonable diligence, determined that an overpayment was received and quantified the overpayment.

A provider determined to finesbe liable under the False Claims Act.Act may be required to pay three times the amount of actual damages sustained by the federal government, in addition to mandatory civil monetary penalties that range from $10,957 to $21,916 for each false or fraudulent claim, after taking 2017 updates into account. These penalties will be updated annually based on changes to the consumer price index. Private parties may initiate whistleblower lawsuits againstalleging the defrauding of the federal government by a provider and may receive a share of any personsettlement or entityjudgment. When a private individual brings an action under the False Claims Act in the name of the government and may share in the proceeds of a successful suit. The penalty for violation of the False Claims Act is a minimum of $5,500 and a maximum of $11,000 for each fraudulent claim plus three times the amount of damages caused to the government as a result of each fraudulent claim. A False Claims Act violation may provide the basis for the imposition of administrative penalties as well as exclusion from participation in governmental health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. In addition to thefederal False Claims Act, the defendant generally is not made aware of the lawsuit under the federal government may use several criminal statutes to prosecute the submission of falsecommences its own investigation or fraudulent claimsdetermines whether it will intervene.

Every entity that receives at least $5 million in Medicaid payments annually must have written policies regarding certain federal and state laws for payment to the federal government.

Amendments to the False Claims Act in the Health Reform Actall employees, contractors and agents. These polices must provide that a provider must report and return overpayments within 60 days of identifying the overpayment or the claims for the services that generated the overpayments becomedetailed information about false claims, subject to the False Claims Act. Overpayments include payments for services for which the provider does not have proper documentation.false statements and whistleblower protections.

Many states, including Illinois, Nevada and California have similar false claims statutes that impose additional liability for the types of acts prohibited by the False Claims Act.

Other Fraud Alerts:and Abuse ProvisionsFrom time to time,: Criminal and civil penalties may be imposed under various other federal and state agencies, such asstatutes that prohibit various forms of fraud and abuse. For example, the U.S. Departmentfederal Civil Monetary Penalties Law (“CMPL”) imposes substantial penalties for offering remuneration or other inducements to influence federal healthcare beneficiaries’ decisions to seek specific governmentally reimbursable items or services or to choose particular providers. It also imposes penalties for contracting with an individual or entity known to be excluded from a federal healthcare program. The CMPL requires a lower burden of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”), issue pronouncements that identify practices that may be subject to heightened scrutiny, as well as practices that may violateproof than some other fraud and abuse laws. We believe, but cannot assure you, that our operations comply withlaws, including the principles expressed byfederal Anti-Kickback Statute. Civil monetary penalties increased significantly in 2016, were further adjusted in 2017, and will be updated annually based on changes to the Office of the Inspector General (the “OIG”) in these reports and special fraud alerts.

HIPAA and the HITECH Act: HIPAA privacy regulations contain detailed requirements concerning the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information by “HIPAA covered entities,” which includes our company.consumer price index. In addition to the privacy requirements, HIPAA coveredfinancial penalties, federal enforcement officials are able to exclude from Medicare or Medicaid any individuals or entities must implement certain security standardsconvicted of Medicare or Medicaid fraud or other offenses related to protect the integrity, confidentiality and availabilitydelivery of certain electronic health information. The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH Act”) imposes additional privacy and security requirements on health care providers and on their business associates. Failure to comply with HIPAA or the HITECH Act could result in fines and penalties that could have a material adverse effect on us.

Most states, including Illinois, Nevada and California also have laws that protect the privacy and security of confidential personal information.

Civil Monetary Penalties:The DHHS may impose civil monetary penalties upon any person or entity that presents, or causes to be presented, certain ineligible claims for medical items or services. The amount of penalties varies, depending on the offense, from $2,000 to $50,000 per violation plus treble damages for the amount at issue and exclusion from federal health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. In addition, personsservices under those programs. Persons who have been excluded from the Medicare or Medicaid program may not retain ownership in a participating entity. Participating entities that permit continued ownership by excluded individuals, that contract with excluded individuals, and the excluded individuals themselves, may be penalized. Penalties are also applicable in certain other cases, including violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Law, payments to limit certain patient services and improper execution of statements of medical necessity.

Surveys and AuditsPayment Integrity

We are subject to routine and periodic surveys and audits by various governmental agencies and other payors. From time to time, we receive and respond to survey reports containing statements of deficiencies. Periodic and random audits conducted or directed by these agencies could result in a delay in receipt or an adjustment to the amount of reimbursements due or received under federal or state programs. Violation of

Under the applicable federal and state health care regulations can result in excluding a health care provider from participating in the Medicare and/or Medicaid and other federal and state healthcare programs and can subject the provider to substantial civil and/or criminal penalties.

Pursuant to the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, the DHHS created a permanent and national recovery auditRecovery Audit Contractor (“RAC”) program, CMS contracts with third parties to identify improper Medicare payments made on claims of health care services provided to Medicare beneficiaries. The program uses recovery audit contractors, or RACs, to identify the improper Medicare payments and protect the Medicare Trust Fund from fraud, waste and abuse. Since the start of the program, RACs have identified more then $4.8 billion in improper payments. RACs are paid a contingent fee based on the improper payments identified.identified and corrected. CMS has also instituted Zone Program Integrity Contracts (“ZPICs”) for additional audit of Medicare providers, including home health agencies. By statute, states are required to enter into contracts with RACs to audit payments to Medicaid providers. Further, under the Medicaid Integrity Program, CMS employs private contractors, referred to as Medicaid Integrity Contractors (“MICs”), to perform post-payment audits of Medicaid claims and identify overpayments.

From time to time, various federal and state agencies, such as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), issue pronouncements that identify practices that may be subject to heightened scrutiny, as well as practices that may violate fraud and abuse laws. For example, the Office of the Inspector General (the “OIG”) issued an Investigative Advisory in 2012 that identified a number of program integrity vulnerabilities in the delivery of personal care services and recommending corrective actions by CMS. In December 2016, CMS issued a bulletin highlighting safeguards that state Medicaid agencies can put in place around personal care services. It has also issued guidance to personal care services agencies and attendants on avoiding improper payments. We believe, but cannot assure you, that our operations comply with the principles expressed by HHS in these reports, advisories and guidance.

HIPAA and Other Privacy and Security Requirements

The HIPAA Administrative Simplification provisions and implementing regulations require the use of uniform electronic data transmission standards and code sets for certain healthcare claims and reimbursement payment transactions submitted or received electronically. These provisions are intended to encourage electronic commerce in the U.S. healthcare industry.

HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”), and its implementing regulations extensively regulate the use, disclosure, confidentiality, availability and integrity of individually identifiable health information, known as “protected health information,” and provide for a number of individual rights with respect to such information. These requirements apply to most healthcare providers, which are known as “covered entities,” including our company. Vendors, known as “business associates,” that handle protected health information, on behalf of covered entities must also comply with most HIPAA requirements. A covered entity may be subject to penalties as a result of a business associate violating HIPAA, if the business associate is found to be an agent of the covered entity.

Covered entities must, among other things, maintain privacy and security policies, train workforce members, maintain physical, administrative, and technical safeguards, enter into confidentiality agreements with business associates, and permit individuals to access and amend their protected health information. In addition, covered entities must report breaches of unsecured (unencrypted) protected health information to affected individuals without unreasonable delay, but not to exceed 60 calendar days from the discovery date of the breach. Notification must also be made to HHS and, in certain cases involving large breaches, to the media.

HIPAA violations may result in criminal penalties and significant civil penalties. Our company is also subject to other applicable federal or state laws that are more restrictive than HIPAA, which could result in additional penalties. For example, the Federal Trade Commission uses its consumer protection authority to initiate enforcement actions against entities whose inadequate data security programs may expose consumers to fraud, identity theft and privacy intrusions. Various state laws and regulations require entities that maintain individually identifiable information (even if not health-related) to report data breaches to affected individuals and, in some cases, state regulators. We expect compliance with HIPAA and other privacy and security standards to continue to impose significant costs on our business lines.

Environmental, Health and Safety Laws

We are subject to federal, state and local regulations governing the storage, transport, use and disposal of hazardous materials and waste products. In the event of an accident involving such hazardous materials, we could be held liable for any damages that result, and any liability could exceed the limits or fall outside the coverage of our insurance. We may not be able to maintain insurance on acceptable terms, or at all.

 

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

The risks described below, and the risks described elsewhere in this Form 10-K, could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, cause the trading price of our common stock to decline and cause the actual outcome of matters to differ materially from our current expectations as to whichreflected in forward-looking statements are made in this Form 10-K. The risk factors described below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may also be materially adversely affected by factors that are not currently known to us, by factors that we currently consider immaterial or by factors that are not specific to us, such as general economic conditions.

If any of the following risks are actually realized, our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

You should refer to the explanation of the qualifications and limitations on forward-looking statements under “Special Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements.” All forward-looking statements made by us are qualified by the risk factors described below.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

ChangesReductions in reimbursement and other changes to Medicaid, Medicaid waiver, or other state and local medical and social programs could adversely affect our client caseload, units of service, net service revenues, gross profit and profitability.

For the year ended December 31, 2013,2016, we derived approximately 94%70.4% of our net service revenues from continuing operations from agreements that are directly or indirectly paid for by state and local governmental agencies, such asprimarily through Medicaid funded programs and Medicaid waiver programs. Governmental agencies generally condition their agreements with us upon a sufficient budgetary appropriation. If a governmental agency does not receive an appropriation sufficient to cover its contractual obligations with us, it may terminate an agreement or defer or reduce the amount of the reimbursement we receive. Almost all of the states in which we operate are facinghave experienced periodic financial pressures and budgetary shortfalls due to the currentchallenging economic downturnconditions and the rising costs of health care,healthcare, and asthe Medicaid program is often a state’s largest program. As a result, many states have made, are considering or may consider making changes in their Medicaid, Medicaid waiver or other state and local medical and social programs, including enacting legislation designed to reduce Medicaid expenditures.

Changes at the federal level also affect Medicaid policy and funding and the healthcare industry more broadly. The ACA, for example, made significant changes to Medicaid eligibility requirements. Future health reform efforts or efforts to repeal or significantly change the ACA will likely impact state programs. The Deficit Reduction ActIn addition, the federal government oversees various demonstration projects and Medicaid waiver programs under which states may apply to test new or existing approaches to payment and delivery of 2005 permits states to make benefit cuts to their Medicaid programs, which could affectbenefits.

If changes in Medicaid policy result in a reduction in available funds for the services we offer or a reduction in the number of beneficiaries eligible for which states contract with us. our services, our net service revenues could be negatively impacted. Our profitability depends principally on the levels of government-mandated payment rates and our ability to manage the cost of providing services.

Changes that states have mademay occur at the federal or may consider makingstate level to address their budget deficits or otherwise contain costs include:

 

limiting increases in, or decreasing, reimbursement rates;

 

redefining eligibility standards or coverage criteria for social and medical programs or the receipt of home and community basedpersonal care services under those programs;

 

increasing the consumer’s share of costs orconsumer responsibility, including through increased co-payment requirements;

 

decreasing benefits available under Medicaid programs, such as limiting the number of authorized hours for recipients;of personal care services that will be covered;

 

slowing payments to providers;

 

increasing utilization of self-directed care alternatives or “all inclusive” programs; or

 

shifting beneficiaries to managed care programs.organizations.

Certain of these measures have been implemented by, or are proposed in, states in which we operate. For example, California has considered a number of proposals, including potential changes in eligibility standards or hours utilization and Illinois has delayed payments to providers. In 2013,2016, we derived approximately 66%53.6% of our total net service revenues from continuing operations from services provided in Illinois, 6%12.9% of our total net service revenues from continuing operations in New York, 7.5% of our total net service revenues from services providedcontinuing operations in CaliforniaNew Mexico and 7%4.5% of our total net service revenues from continuing operations from services provided in Washington. Because a substantial portion of our business is concentrated in these states, any significant reduction in expenditures that pay for our services in these states and other states in which we do business may have a disproportionately negative impact on our future operating results. ProvisionsIllinois, in particular, is experiencing budgetary issues. The Governor of Illinois proposed a budget for fiscal year 2017 (which started July 1, 2016) that contains several measures aimed at reducing costs associated with the Health Reform Act increase eligibility for Medicaid, which may cause a reallocation of Medicaid funding. It is difficult to predict at this time what the effect ofIllinois Department on Aging. If enacted, these changes would be on our business. If changes in Medicaid policy result in a reduction in available funds for the services we offer, our net service revenuesmeasures could be negatively impacted.

Under the Health Reform Act, the federal medical assistance percentage (the “FMAP”) paid by the federal government to states that elect to provide Medicaid coverage to low income adults who were previously ineligible for Medicaid is 100% for calendar years 2014-2016 and gradually decreases to 90% in 2020 and thereafter. Not all states in which we do business may elect to provide coverage to newly eligible individuals. We are not able at this time to determine the impact that these changes will have on our business.

In March 2013, the federal government implemented certain budgetary restrictions, commonly known as sequestration. Although Medicaid is exempt from these automatic cuts, sequestration remains in place and could negatively impact reimbursement or authorizations for services under our federal or state contracts.

A number of states have initiated efforts to combat Medicaid fraud and overpayments. Ifaffect the number of Medicaid applicants or recipients is significantly reduced asclients we serve and our growth in Illinois.

In some cases, commercial insurance companies and other private payors rely on government payment systems to determine payment rates. As a result, changes to government healthcare programs that reduce Medicaid payments may negatively impact payments from private payors, as well. Any reduction in reimbursements or imposition of these efforts,copayments that dissuade the numberuse of consumers we serveour services, or any reduction in reimbursement from private payors, could be reduced, which could negativelymaterially adversely affect our business and results of operations.profitability.

State effortsThe implementation of alternative payment models and the transition of Medicaid beneficiaries to transition their home and community based programs to being administered by managed care plansorganizations may limit our market share and could adversely affect our net service revenues and our profitability.revenues.

Under the Health Reform Act, statesMany government and commercial payors are encouragedtransitioning providers to integrate the state managed Medicaid homealternative payment models that are designed to promote cost-efficiency, quality and community based programs with managed Medicare programs. The objective of these initiatives is to enhance the coordination of benefits between the two programscare. For example, accountable care organizations (“ACOs”) incentivize hospitals, physician groups, and other providers to lower overallorganize and coordinate patient care while reducing unnecessary costs.

Nationally, 34 Several states have initiated,implemented, or plan to initiate,implement, accountable care models for their Medicaid populations. If we are not included in these programs, or if ACOs establish programs that overlap with our services, we are at risk for losing market share and for a loss of our current business.

We may be similarly impacted by state efforts to pursue thesetransition Medicaid beneficiaries to managed care organizations. States are increasingly relying on managed care to deliver services within their Medicaid programs including 15 of the 21 states in which we provide services. However, the timing for implementation of these demonstration projects are unknown at this time. In addition, the final regulations implementing these programs modify the requirements and definitions around home and community-based settings.as a strategy to control costs. We cannot assure you that:that we will be able to secure favorable contracts with all or some of the managed care organizations;organizations, that our reimbursement under these programs will remain at current levels;levels, that the authorizations for services will remain at current levels or that our profitability will remain at levels consistent with past performance. If states in which we provide services transition their home and community based programsIn addition, operational processes may not be well defined as a state transitions beneficiaries to managed care plans and we are not ablecare. For example, communication of changes to participate through contracts witheither the managed care organization or otherwise, we could lose revenue generatedthe consumers may be unclear. Membership, new referrals and the related authorization for services to be provided may be delayed, which may result in those states, evendelays in statesservice delivery to consumers or in which we currently have contracts to provide home and community based services.

The implementation of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)payment for services rendered. Difficulties with operational processes may limit our ability to increase our market share and could adverselynegatively affect our revenues.revenue growth rates, cash flow and profitability for services provided.

CMS published final ACO regulations in October 2011, which established a shared savings program to facilitate coordination and cooperation among providers to improve the quality of care for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries and reduce unnecessary costs. These programs are focused on efforts by hospitals and physician groups to organize the medical providers and are not directed toward home and community based

service providers. If we are not included in development of these programs, or if the ACOs establish similar services to include home and community based programs for their participants, we are at risk for losing market share and for a loss of our current business. Other cost savingscost-saving initiatives may be presented by the government and commercial payors to control costs and reduce hospital admissions / readmissions in which we could be financially atthat subject our company to financial risk. We cannot predict at this time what effect ACOs or like organizationsalternative payment models may have on our company.

Our revenues are concentrated in a small number of states which will make us particularly sensitive to regulatory and economic changes in those states.

Our revenues are particularly sensitive to regulatory and economic changes in states in which we generate a significant portion of our revenues, including Illinois, New York, New Mexico and Washington. Accordingly, any change in the current demographic, economic, competitive or regulatory conditions in these states could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Changes to the Medicaid programs in these states could also have a disproportionately adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Efforts to reduce the costs of the Illinois Department on Aging program could adversely affect our service revenues and profitability.

In 2013,2016, we derived approximately 58.8%42.1% of our revenue from continuing operations from the Illinois Department on Aging programs. Since 2011In his fiscal year 2016 budget proposal, the StateGovernor of Illinois has undertaken a number of initiatives to reduce the costs ofproposed changes aimed at reducing expenditures by the Illinois Department on Aging, program, such as an income cap and higher threshold of need for eligibility in the mandated utilizationCommunity Care Program, as well as elimination of an electronic visit verification (EVV) system by all providers. Itthe add-on rate the Illinois Department on Aging had been paying Community Care Program service providers to help those providers pay for employee healthcare. Illinois did not enact a budget for fiscal year 2016 and therefore none of

the Governor of Illinois’s proposals were enacted. The Governor of Illinois also issued a proposed budget for fiscal year 2017, which began July 1, 2016. In his proposed 2017 budget, the Governor again offered several measures intended to reduce costs associated with the Illinois Department on Aging, such as shifting non-Medicaid eligible seniors from the Community Care Program to a new program known as the Community Reinvestment Program, a move that the Governor estimated will save approximately $197 million in fiscal year 2017. At this time, it is difficult to ascertain whathow significant an impact if any, these initiatives will have on our business. If they impact the eligibility of our consumers, the number of hours authorized or services provided to existing consumers, they would adversely affect our service revenues and profitability.growth.

Delays in reimbursement due to state budget deficits or otherwise have decreased, and may increase in the future, further decrease,adversely affecting our liquidity.

There is generally a delay between the time that we provide services and the time that we receive reimbursement or payment for these services. The majorityMany of the 21 states in which we operate are operating with budget deficits for their current fiscal year. These and other states may in the future delay reimbursement, which would adversely affect our liquidity. Specifically, the State of Illinois is currently reimbursing us on a delayed basis, including with respect to our agreements with the Illinois Department on Aging, our largest payor. Our reimbursements from the State of Illinois could be further delayed. In addition, from time to time, procedural issues require us to resubmit claims before payment is remitted, which contributes to our aged receivables. Additionally, unanticipated delays in receiving reimbursement from state programs due to changes in their policies or billing or audit procedures may adversely impact our liquidity and working capital. Because weWe fund our operations primarily through the collection of accounts receivable.

Specifically, the State of Illinois is currently reimbursing us on a delayed basis. The State of Illinois did not adopt a comprehensive budget for fiscal year 2016, which ended on June 30, 2016, and it has not yet adopted a comprehensive budget for fiscal year 2017, which began on July 1, 2016. Stopgap budget legislation was enacted on June 30, 2016, which appropriated funds through December 31, 2016. Without a budget, the State is not authorized to pay for non-Medicaid consumers we serve. Non-Medicaid consumers from Illinois represent approximately 15% of our current total annual revenues. Our accounts receivable, anynet of allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2016 increased 37.7% compared to 2015, due in part to delays in reimbursement would resultfrom the State of Illinois in the needsecond half of 2016. Accounts receivable attributable to increase borrowings under our credit facility.

Our revenue maydelayed payments from the Illinois Department on Aging totaled $53.0 million at the end of 2016, approximately $36.8 related to Non-Medicaid consumers and approximately $16.2 related to Medicaid consumers. Reimbursements from the State of Illinois could be negatively impacted by a failure to appropriately document services, resulting delays in reimbursement and related indemnification obligations.

Reimbursement to us is conditioned upon providing the correct administrative and billing codes and properly documenting the services themselves, including the level of service provided, and the necessity for the services. If incorrect or incomplete documentation is provided or inaccurate reimbursement codes are utilized, this could result in nonpayment for services rendered and could lead to allegations of billing fraud. This could subsequently lead to civil and criminal penalties, including exclusion from government healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. In addition, third-party payors may disallow, in whole or in part, requests for reimbursement based on determinations that certain amounts are not covered, services provided were not medically necessary, or supporting documentation was not adequate. Pursuantfurther delayed due to the Home Health Purchase Agreement, we are obligated to indemnify the Purchaserslack of a budget for among other things, (i) penalties, fines, judgmentsfiscal year 2017 and settlement amounts arising from a violation of certain specified statutes, including the False Claims Act, the Civil Monetary Penalties Law, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the Stark Law or anybecause current forecasts indicate higher state law equivalent in connection with the operation of the Home Health Business prior to the Closing, and (ii) any liability related to the failure of any reimbursement claim submitted to certain government programs for services rendered by the Home Health Business prior to the Closing to meet the requirements of such government programs, or any violation prior to the Closing of any health care laws. Such liabilities include amounts to be recouped by, or repaid to, such government programs as a result of improperly submitted claims for reimbursement or those discovered as a result of audits by investigative agencies. All services that we have provided that have been or

may be reimbursed by Medicare are subject to retroactive adjustments and/or total denial of payments received from Medicare under various review and audit provisions includeddeficits in the program regulations. The review period is generally described as six years from the date the services are provided but could be expanded to ten years under certain circumstances if fraud is found to have existed at the time of original billing. In the event that there are adjustments relating to the period prior to the Closing, we may be required to reimburse the Purchasers or the government for the amount of such adjustments, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition. In addition, timing delays may cause working capital shortages. Working capital management, including prompt and diligent billing and collection, is an important factor in achieving our financial results and maintaining liquidity. It is possible that documentation support, system problems, provider issues or industry trends may extend our collection period, which may materially adversely affect our working capital, and our working capital management procedures may not successfully mitigate this risk.near future.

The implementation or expansion of self-directed care programs in states in which we operate may limit our ability to increase our market share and could adversely affect our revenue.

Self-directed care programs are funded by Medicaid and state and local agencies and allow the consumer to exercise discretion in selecting home and community basedpersonal care service providers. Consumers may hire family members, friends or neighbors to provide services that might otherwise be provided by a home and community basedpersonal care service agency provider, such as our company. Most states and the District of Columbia have implemented self-directed care programs, to varying degrees and for different types of consumers. States are under pressure from the federal government and certain advocacy groups to expand these programs. CMS has provided states with specific Medicaid waiver options for programs that offer person-centered planning, individual budgeting or self-directed services and support as part of the CMS Independence Plus initiative introduced in 2002 under an Executive Order of the President. Certain private foundations have also granted resources to states to develop and study programs that provide financial accounts to consumers for their long-term care needs, and counseling services to help prepare a plan of care that will help meet those needs. Expansion of these self-directed programs may erode our Medicaid consumer base and could adversely affect our net service revenues.

Failure to renew a significant agreement or group of related agreements may materially impact our revenue.

In 2013,2016, we derived approximately 58.8%42.1% of our net service revenues from continuing operations under agreements with the Illinois Department on Aging, 6.6% of our net service revenues from continuing operations under an agreement with Washington, 3.4% of our net service revenues from continuing operations under an agreement with Nevada Medicaid and 3.8% of our net service revenues from continuing operations under an agreement with the Riverside County (California) Department of Public Social Services.Aging. Each of our agreements is generally in effect for a specific term. For example, the services we provide to the Illinois Department on Aging are provided under a number of agreements that expire at various times through 2015, while our agreement with the Riverside County Department of Public Social Services is reevaluated and subject to renewal annually. In addition, our relationship with Riverside County may change before the end of the term of our agreement, including any renewal terms, as the State of California and Riverside County are planning to enter into managed care demonstration plans whereby the services we provide to consumers in the county would become the responsibility of the contracted managed care plans.

Even though our agreements are stated to be for a specific term, they are generally terminable by the counterparty uponwith 60 days’ notice. Our ability to renew or retain our agreements depends on our quality of service and reputation, as well as other factors over which we have little or no control, such as state appropriations and changes in provider eligibility requirements. Additionally, failure to satisfy any of the numerous technical renewal requirements in connection with our proposals for agreements could result in a proposal being rejected even if it contains favorable pricing terms. Failure to obtain, renew or retain agreements with major payors may negatively impact our results of operations and revenue. We can give no assurance these agreements will be renewed on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Our industry is highly competitive, fragmented and market-specific, with limited barriers to entry.

We compete with home and community basedpersonal care service providers, home health providers, private caregivers, larger publicly held companies, privately held companies, privately held single-site agencies, hospital-based agencies, not-for-profit organizations, community-based organizations and self-directed care programs. In addition, certain governmental payors contract for services with independentmultiple personal care service providers and other provider types such that our relationships with these payors are not exclusive, particularly in California. Our competition consists of home and community based service providers, home health providers, private caregivers, larger publicly traded companies, privately held companies, privately held single-site agencies, hospital-based agencies, non-for-profit organizations, community-based organizations, managed care organizations and self-directed care programs.exclusive. Some of our competitors may have greater financial, technical, political and marketing resources, name recognition or a larger number of consumers and payors than we do. In addition, some of these organizations offer more services than we do in the markets in which we operate. Consumers or referral sources may perceive that local service providers and not-for-profit agencies deliver higher quality services or are more responsive. These competitive advantages may limit our ability to attract and retain referrals in local markets and to increase our overall market share.

ThereIn most states, there are limited barriers to entry in providing home-based social and medical services, and thepersonal care services. The trend has beenregarding these barriers is mixed; for states to eliminate many of the barriers that historically existed. For example, Illinois changed the way in which it procures home and community basedpersonal care service providers in 2009, allowing, per federal Medicaid regulation, all providers that are willing and capable to obtain state approval and provide services. ThisHowever, more states have added a licensing requirement for home care services and economic changes such as increases in minimum wage, the employer mandate under ACA, and changes in Department of Labor rules can also impact the ease of entry into a market. These factors may increaseaffect competition in that state, and because we derived approximately 66% of our net service revenues from continuing operations from services provided in Illinois in 2013, this increased competition could negatively impact our business.states.

Local competitors may develop strategic relationships with referral sources and payors. This could result in pricing pressures, loss of or failure to gain market share or loss of consumers or payors, any of which could harm our business. In addition, existing competitors may offer new or enhanced services that we do not provide, or be viewed by consumers as a more desirable local alternative. The introduction of new and enhanced service offerings, in combination with the development of strategic relationships by our competitors, could cause a decline in revenue, a loss of market acceptance of our services and a negative impact on our results of operations.

Our profitability could be negatively affected by a reduction in reimbursement from payors.

States such as Illinois and California are experiencing large budget deficits, which may result in lower Medicaid payments. In addition, private payors, including commercial insurance companies, could also reduce reimbursement. Any reduction in Medicaid reimbursements or imposition of copayments that dissuade the use of our services, or any reduction in reimbursement from private payors, would materially adversely affect our profitability.

We are subjectIf we fail to extensive government regulation. Changes tocomply with the laws and extensive regulations governing our business, we could be subject to penalties or be required to make changes to our operations, which could negatively impact our profitability and any failure to comply with these regulations could adversely affect our business.profitability.

The federal government and the states in which we operate regulate our industry extensively. The laws and regulations governing our operations, along with the terms of participation in various government programs, impose certain requirements on the way in which we do business, the services we offer, and our interactions with consumersproviders and the public.consumers. These requirements include matters related to:

 

licensure, certification and certification;enrollment with government programs;

 

eligibility requirements and appropriateness of services provided necessity of care;

adequacy and quality of services;

 

qualifications and training of personnel;

 

confidentiality, maintenance, data breach, identity theft and security issues associated with health-related and personal information and medical recordsrecords;

environmental protection, health and claims processing;

the use and disclosure of protected health information;safety;

 

relationships with physicians, and other referral sources;sources and recipients of referrals;

 

operating policies and procedures;

 

addition of facilities and services;

adequacy of documentation for services provided;

billing and coding for services;

timely and proper handling of overpayments; and

 

billing for services.debt collection.

These laws include, but are not limited to, HIPAA, HITECH, the Stark Law, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal False Claims Act and similar state laws. While we endeavor to comply with applicable laws and regulations, includingwe cannot assure you that our practices are fully compliant, or that courts or regulatory agencies will not interpret those laws and regulations in ways that will adversely affect our practices. Also, the Health Reform Act,laws and their interpretations,regulations governing our business are subject to frequent change.change, interpretations may evolve or enforcement focus may shift. These changes could reduce our profitability by increasing our liability, increasing our administrative and other costs, increasing or decreasing mandated services, forcingsubject us to restructure ourallegations of impropriety or illegality, require restructuring of relationships with referral sources and providers or requiring usotherwise require changes to implement additional or different programs and systems.our operations. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could lead to civil sanctions and criminal penalties, the termination of rights to participate in federal and state-sponsored programs, exclusion from federal healthcare programs, the suspension or revocation of licenses and other civil and criminal penalties and a delaynonpayment or delays in our ability to bill and collect for services provided. We cannot assure you that the provisions described above will notprovided, any of which could adversely impactaffect our business, results of operations, or financial results. Further,Federal and state government agencies have heightened and coordinated civil and criminal enforcement efforts throughout the healthcare industry.

In addition, as a result of our participation in Medicaid, Medicaid waiver, Medicare programs, Veterans Health Administration programs and other state and local governmental programs, and pursuant to certain of our contractual relationships, we may be unable to mitigate any adverse effects resulting from the Health Reform Act.

The Health Reform Act amended the False Claims Act to provide that a provider must report and return overpayments within 60 days of identifying the overpayment or the claims for the services that generated the overpayments become false claimsare subject to the False Claims Act. Overpayments include payments for services for which the provider does not have proper documentation. If we werevarious reviews, compliance audits and investigations by governmental authorities and other third parties to identify documentation failures that could not be corrected we could be required to return payments received for those claims within the mandated 60-day time period.verify our compliance with these programs and agreements as well as applicable laws, regulations and conditions of participation. If we fail to identifymeet any of the conditions of participation or coverage with respect to state licensure or our participation in Medicaid, Medicaid waiver, Medicare programs, Veterans Health Administration programs and return overpaymentsother state and local governmental programs, we may receive a notice of deficiency from the applicable surveyor or authority. Failure to institute a plan of action to correct the deficiency within the required 60-day period we could be subject to suits under the False Claims Actprovided by the governmentsurveyor or relators (whistleblowers). Anyauthority could result in civil or criminal penalties, the imposition of these could have a material adverse impact onfines or other sanctions, damage to our business and operations. During an internal evaluation of billing processes, we discovered documentation errors in a number of claims that we had submitted to Medicare and consistent with applicable law, in March 2014, we voluntarily remitted approximately $1.8 million to the government. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Details of Certain Balance Sheet Accounts, included elsewhere herein for more information.

In October 2013, California enacted the Home Care Services Consumer Protection Act. The act establishes a licensing program for home care organizations, and requires background checks, basic training, and tuberculosis screening for the aides that are employed by home care organizations. Home care organizations and aides will have until January 1, 2015 to comply with the new licensing and background check requirements. Although we sold the bulkreputation, cancellation of our home health business in California in March 2013, we continue to operate in California. The requirementsagreements, suspension or revocation of the act are expected to impose additional costs on us.

We are subject to variousour licenses or disqualification from federal and state regulationsreimbursement programs. These actions may adversely affect our ability to provide certain services, to receive payments from other payors and laws, including Anti-kickback laws, the Stark Law, the False Claims Act, Fraud Alerts, HIPPAto continue to operate. Further, actions taken against one of our locations may subject our other locations to adverse consequences. We may also fail to discover all instances of noncompliance by our acquisition targets, which could subject us to adverse remedies once those acquisitions are complete. Any termination of one or more of our locations from any federal, state or local program for failure to satisfy such program’s conditions of participation could adversely affect our net service revenues and the HITECH Act as described in the Section “Government Regulation” discussed elsewhere in this document. Failure to comply to these regulations or violations to these laws could lead to fines and exclusions or other sanctions that could have a material effect on our business.profitability.

We are subject to federal and state laws that govern our employment practices.practices, including minimum wage and local living wage ordinances. Failure to comply with these laws, or changes to these laws that increase our employment-related expenses, could adversely impact our operations.

We are required to comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations relating to employment, including occupational safety and health requirements, wage and hour requirements, employment insurance and equal employment opportunity laws. These laws can vary significantly among states and can be highly technical. Costs and expenses related to these requirements are a significant operating expense and may increase as a result of, among other things, changes in federal or state laws or regulations requiring employers to provide specified

benefits to employees, increases in the minimum wage and local living wage ordinances, increases in the level of existing benefits or the lengthening of periods for which unemployment benefits are available. We may not be able to offset any increased costs and expenses. Furthermore, any failure to comply with these laws, including even a seemingly minor infraction, can result in significant penalties which could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business.

In addition, certain individuals and entities, known as excluded persons, are prohibited from receiving payment for their services rendered to Medicaid, Medicare and other federal and state healthcare program beneficiaries. If we inadvertently hire or contract with an excluded person, or if any of our current employees or contractors becomes an excluded person in the future without our knowledge, we may be subject to substantial civil penalties, including up to $10,000$11,052 for each item or service furnished by the excluded individual to a federal or state healthcare program beneficiary, an assessment of up to three times the amount claimed and exclusion from the program.

Under the Health Reform Act, beginning in 2015, if we continue to provide a medical plan, we will beACA, each of our subsidiaries that employ employees (“EIN’s”) were required to provideoffer a minimum level of health coverage for 70 percent95% of our full-time employees in 2016 or be subject to an annual penalty. ManyFive of our employeesEIN’s met this requirement and four did not. We are not provided any medical coverage. If we determine that we will provideevaluating our options to minimize our exposure going forward. We could be assessed fines or penalties as a result of this matter if an employee obtains medical coverage for these employees, the costs could be materialthrough federal and have a significant effect on our profitability.state health exchanges.

In September 2013, the United States Department of Labor (the “Department of Labor”) announced the adoption of a rule that extended the minimum wage and overtime pay requirements of federal law to most direct care workers, such as home health aides, personalhome care aides and certified nursing assistants. These employees have been exempt from federal wage laws since 1974. The new rule willwas slated to take effect on January 1, 2015, (though the Department of Labor announced on October 7, 2014 that it would delay enforcement of the rule until June 30, 2015). Two decisions from the United States Court for the District of Columbia, handed down on December 22, 2014 and January 14, 2015, invalidated key provisions in the rule, effectively restoring the status quo in which home care agencies and other third party employers were able to utilize the “companionship services” exemption to the minimum wage and overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act. However, on August 21, 2015, the United States District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reversed the lower court’s previous ruling and reinstated the Department of Labor’s rule to extend federal minimum wage and overtime pay protections to most direct care workers. The rule became effective on October 13, 2015, and the Department of Labor began enforcement of the rule in November 2015. The National Association for Home Care and Hospice has appealed the Court of Appeals decision to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court refused to grant certiorari and review the appeal. As a result the Department of Labor’s rule has become final. Historically, we did not rely on the exemption to minimum wage and overtime regulations that were eliminated by the Department of Labor. Certain acquired entities did rely on the exemption, however, beginning in November of 2015 all Addus HomeCare operations were in compliance with the new rules.

A number of states alreadyalso require that direct care workers receive state-mandated minimum wage and/or overtime pay. Opponents say that the new protections will make in-home care more expensive for government programs such as Medicaid that pay for such services, and that the new rule could result in a reduction in covered services. We are currently evaluatingwill continue to evaluate the effect of the new rule on our operations.

We are subject to reviews, compliance audits and investigations that could result in adverse findings that negatively affect our net service revenues and profitability.

As

The Department of Labor also issued a result of our participation in Medicaid, Medicaid waiver, Medicare programs, Veterans Health Administration programs and other state and local governmental programs, and pursuant to certain of our contractual relationships, we are subject to various reviews, audits and investigations by governmental authorities and other third parties to verify our compliance with these programs and agreements as well as applicable laws, regulations and conditions of participation. Pursuant to the Home Health Purchase Agreement, we are obligated to indemnify the Purchasers for,proposed rule that, among other things, (i) penalties, fines, judgmentswould increase the minimum annual salary required for certain employees to be classified as “exempt” from entitlement to overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) from $23,660 to $47,476. Under the proposed rule which was scheduled to go into effect on December 1, 2016, this salary level would be increased every three years and settlement amounts arising from a violation of certain specified statutes, including the False Claims Act, the Civil Monetary Penalties Law, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the Stark Law or any state law equivalent in connection with the operation of the Home Health Business priorindexed to the Closing, and (ii) any liability related to the failure of any reimbursement claim submitted to certain government programsaverage salary levels for services renderedfull time employees as reported by the Home Health Business priorBureau of Labor Statistics. If finalized in its current form, this proposed rule could increase our costs by requiring us to pay overtime to additional employees. A number of states filed litigation against the ClosingDepartment of Labor seeking to meetblock this new overtime rule. The federal district court judge for the requirementsEastern District of such government programs,Texas in which the case was filed issued a preliminary injunction on November 22, 2016, enjoining the Department of Labor from implementing and enforcing the overtime final rule. The Department of Labor has appealed that ruling and, in the meantime, the case before the district court is continuing to move forward.

Our business may be adversely impacted if the ACA is repealed entirely or any violation prior to the Closing of any health care laws. Such liabilities include amounts to be recouped by, or repaid to, such government programsif provisions benefitting our operations are significantly modified as a result of improperly submitted claims for reimbursementthe 2016 federal elections.

The 2016 federal elections have increased the likelihood that the ACA will be repealed, replaced, or those discoveredsignificantly changed. The new presidential administration and certain members of Congress have stated their intent to repeal or make significant changes to the ACA, its implementation and its interpretation. In addition, the president signed an executive order that directs agencies to minimize “economic and regulatory burdens” of the ACA, but it is not clear how this will be implemented. There is uncertainty regarding whether, when, and how the ACA will be changed, what alternative provisions, if any, will be enacted, and the impact of alternative provisions on providers and other healthcare industry participants. Certain provisions of the ACA, as a result of audits by investigative agencies. All services that we have provided thatcurrently structured, have been or may be reimbursed by Medicare are subjectbeneficial to retroactive adjustments and/or total denial of payments received from Medicare under various review and audit provisions included in the program regulations. The review period is generally described as six years from the date the services are provided but could be expanded to ten years under certain circumstances if fraud is found to have existed at the time of original billing. In the event that there are adjustments relating to the period prior to the Closing, we may be required to reimburse the Purchasers for the amount of such adjustments, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition. Payments we

receive in respectresults of operations, including the Medicaid and Medicare can be retroactively adjusted after a new examination duringexpansion. Government efforts to repeal or change the claims settlement processACA or as a result of pre- or post-payment audits. Federal, state and local government payors may disallow our requests for reimbursement based on determinations that certain costs are not reimbursable because proper documentation was not provided or because certain services were not covered or deemed necessary. In addition, other third-party payors may reserve rights to conduct audits and make reimbursement adjustments in connection with or exclusive of audit activities. Significant adjustments as a result of these auditsimplement alternative reform measures could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

If we fail to meet any of the conditions of participation or coverage with respect to state licensure or our participation in Medicaid, Medicaid waiver, Medicare programs, Veterans Health Administration programs and other state and local governmental programs, we may receive a notice of deficiency from the applicable surveyor or authority. Failure to institute a plan of action to correct the deficiency within the period provided by the surveyor or authority could result in civil or criminal penalties, the imposition of fines or other sanctions, damage to our reputation, cancellation of our agreements, suspension or revocation of our licenses or disqualification from federal and state reimbursement programs. These actions may adversely affect our ability to provide certain services, to receive payments from other payors and to continue to operate. Additionally, actions taken against one of our locations may subject our other locations to adverse consequences. We may also fail to discover all instances of noncompliance by our acquisition targets, which could subject us to adverse remedies once those acquisitions are complete. Any termination of one or more of our locations from any federal, state or local program for failure to satisfy such program’s conditions of participation could adversely affectcause our net service revenues to decrease and profitability.our provision for bad debt to increase.

Negative publicity or changes in public perception of our services may adversely affect our ability to receive referrals, obtain new agreements and renew existing agreements.

Our success in receiving referrals, obtaining new agreements and renewing our existing agreements depends upon maintaining our reputation as a quality service provider among governmental authorities, physicians, hospitals, discharge planning departments, case managers, nursing homes, rehabilitation centers, advocacy groups, consumers and their families, other referral sources and the public. While we believe that the services that we provide are of high quality, if studies mandated by Congress in the Health Reform ActACA to make public quality measures are implemented and if our quality measures are deemed to be not of the highest value, our reputation could be negatively affected. Negative publicity, changes in public perceptions of our services or government investigations of our operations could damage our reputation and hinder our ability to receive referrals, retain agreements or obtain new agreements. Increased government scrutiny may also contribute to an increase in compliance costs and could discourage consumers from using our services. Any of these events could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

In addition, in connection with the sale of our Home Health Business, we granted a license to the Purchasers that allows them to use certain of our intellectual property, including the Addus name, for the provision of skilled nursing and related physical therapy healthcare services to individuals in their homes and hospice services in California Illinois, Arkansas, South Carolina and Nevada.Illinois. Although the use of the intellectual property is required to be consistent and at least equal to the level of quality and brand perception prior to the sale, we do not have operational control over the Purchasers. As a result, home health agencies operated by the Purchasers may not be operated in a manner consistent with the standards we uphold at our agencies. If such agencies do not maintain operational standards consistent with the standards we demand of our agencies, the image and brand reputation of Addus may suffer and our business may be materially affected.

Our growth strategy depends on our ability to manage growing and changing operations and we may not be successful in managing this growth.

Our business plan calls for significant growth in business over the next several years through the expansion of our services in existing markets and the establishment of a presence in new markets. This growth willwould place significant demands on our management team, systems, internal controls and financial and professional

resources. In addition, we will need to further develop our financial controls and reporting systems to accommodate any such future growth. This could require us to incur expenses for hiring additional qualified personnel, retaining professionals to assist in developing the appropriate control systems and expanding our information technology infrastructure. Our inability to effectively manage growth could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

Future acquisitions or start-upsgrowth initiatives may be unsuccessful and could expose us to unforeseen liabilities.

Our growth strategy includes geographical expansion into new markets and the addition of new services in existing markets through the acquisition of local service providers. These acquisitions involve significant risks and uncertainties, including difficulties assimilating acquired personnel and other corporate cultures into our business, the potential loss of key employees or consumers of acquired providers, and the assumption of liabilities and exposure to unforeseen liabilities of acquired providers. In the past, we have made acquisitions that have not performed as expected or that we have been unable to successfully integrate with our existing operations. In addition, our due diligence review of acquired businesses may not successfully identify all potential issues. For example, we were unable to fully integrate one acquired business because we were unable to procure a necessary government endorsement. The failure to effectively integrate future acquisitions could have an adverse impact on our operations.

We have grown our business through start-up, or de novo locations and we may in the future start upselectively open new locations in existing and new markets. Start-upsstates. De novo locations involve significant risks, including those relating to licensure, accreditation, hiring new personnel, establishing relationships with referral sources and delayeddelays or difficulty in installing our operating and information systems. We may not be successful in establishing start-upde novo locations in a timely manner due to generating insufficient business activity and incurring higher than projected operating cost that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We may be unable to pursue acquisitions or expand into new geographic regions without obtaining additional capital or consent from our lenders.

At December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, we had cash balances of $15.6$8.0 million and $1.7$4.1 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we had $24.1 million outstanding debt on our credit facility. As of December 31, 2015, we had no outstanding debt on our credit facility. After giving effect to the amount drawn on our credit facility, approximately $12.4$16.7 million of outstanding letters of credit at December 31, 2016 and 2015 and borrowing limits based on an advanced multiple of adjusted EBITDA, we had $42.6$79.7 million and $58.2 million available for borrowing under the credit facility as of December 31, 2013.2016 and 2015, respectively. Since our credit facility provides for borrowings based on a multiple of an EBITDA ratio, any declines experienced in our EBITDA would result in a decrease in our available borrowings under our credit facility.

We cannot predict the timing, size and success of our acquisition efforts, our efforts to expand into new geographic regions or the associated capital commitments. If we do not have sufficient cash resources or availability under our credit facility, our growth could be limited unless we obtain additional equity or debt financing. In the future, we may elect to issue additional equity securities in conjunction with raising capital, completing an acquisition or expanding into a new geographic region. Such issuances would be dilutive to existing shareholders. In addition, our credit facility prohibits us from consummating more than three acquisitions in any calendar year, and, inconsummating any event, does not permit theindividual acquisition with a purchase price for any one acquisition to exceed $500,000, in each caseexcess of $25.0 million and consummating acquisitions with a total purchase price in excess of $40.0 million in the

aggregate over the term of the credit facility, without the consent of the lenders. The consideration we paid in connection with 11 of the 14 acquisitions we completed exceeded $500,000. In addition, our credit facility requires, among other things, that we are in pro forma compliance with the financial covenants set forth therein and that no event of default exists before and after giving effect to any proposed acquisition. Our ability to expand in a manner consistent with historic practices may be limited if we are unable to obtain such consent from our lenders.

Access to additional capital and credit markets, at a reasonable cost, may be necessary for us to fund our operations, including potential acquisitions and working capital requirements. We currently rely on one financial

institution for funding under our credit facility and any instability in the financial markets or the negative impact of local, national and worldwide economic conditions on that financial institution could impact our short and long-term liquidity needs to meet our business requirements.

As a result of the indemnification provisions of the Home Health Purchase Agreement pursuant to which we sold Home Health Business, we may incur expenses and liabilities related to periods up to the date of sale or pursuant to our other indemnification obligations thereunder.

As a result of the indemnification provisions of the Home Health Purchase Agreement pursuant to which we sold the Home Health Business, we have agreed to indemnify the Purchasers for, among other things, (i) penalties, fines, judgments and settlement amounts arising from a violation of certain specified statutes, including the False Claims Act, the Civil Monetary Penalties Law, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the Stark Law or any state law equivalent in connection with the operation of the Home Health Business prior to the Closing, and (ii) any liability related to the failure of any reimbursement claim submitted to certain government programs for services rendered by the Home Health Business prior to the Closing to meet the requirements of such government programs, or any violation prior to the Closing of any health carehealthcare laws. Such liabilities include amounts to be recouped by, or repaid to, such government programs as a result of improperly submitted claims for reimbursement or those discovered as a result of audits by investigative agencies. All services that we have provided that have been or may be reimbursed by Medicare are subject to retroactive adjustments and/or total denial of payments received from Medicare under various review and audit provisions included in the program regulations. The review period is generally described as six years from the date the services are provided but could be expanded to ten years under certain circumstances if fraud is found to have existed at the time of original billing. In the event that there are adjustments relating to the period prior to the Closing, we may be required to reimburse the Purchasers for the amount of such adjustments, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

In addition, pursuant to the Home Health Purchase Agreement, we are obligated to indemnify the Purchasers for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants, certain taxes and liabilities related to the pre-Closing period (other than specifically identified assumed liabilities). Any liability we have to the Purchasers under the Home Health Purchase Agreement could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our business may be harmed by labor relations matters.

We are subject to a risk of work stoppages and other labor relations matters because our hourly workforce is highly unionized. As of December 31, 2013,2016, approximately 70%66.1% of our hourly workforce was represented by twoa national unions, including the Service Employees International Union,union, SEIU, which is our largest union. We have a national agreement with the SEIU. Wages and benefitsSEIU which is currently under negotiation, as well as numerous agreements with local SEIU affiliates which are negotiated at the local level at various times throughout the year.renegotiated from time to time. These negotiations are often initiated when we receive increases in our hourly rates from various state agencies. Upon expiration of these collective bargaining agreements, we may not be able to negotiate labor agreements on satisfactory terms with these labor unions. A strike, work stoppage or other slowdown could result in a disruption of our operations and/or higher ongoing labor costs, which could adversely affect our business. Labor costs are the most significant component of our total expenditures and, therefore, an increase in the cost of labor could significantly harm our business.

Our operations subject us to risk of litigation.

Operating in the home and community basedpersonal care services industry exposes us to an inherent risk of wrongful death, personal injury, professional malpractice and other potential claims or litigation brought by our consumers and employees. Because we operate in this industry, from time to time, we are subject to claims alleging that we did not properly treat or care for a consumer that we failed to follow internal or external procedures that resulted in death or harm

to a consumer or that our employees mistreated our consumers, resulting in death or harm. We are also subject to claims arising out of accidents involving vehicle collisions brought by consumers whom we

are transporting or from employees driving to or from home visits. We operate fiveAs of December 31, 2016, we operated three adult day services centers which provide transportation for our elderly and disabled consumers. Each of our vehicles transports 7seven to 14fourteen passengers to and from our locations. The concentration of consumers in one vehicle increases the risk of larger claims being brought against us in the event of an accident. In order to focus on providing services to consumers in their homes, effective March 1, 2017, Addus ceased the adult day services businesses and sold substantially all of the assets used in our adult day services centers.

In addition, regulatory agencies may initiate administrative proceedings alleging violations of statutes and regulations arising from our services and seek to impose monetary penalties on us. We could be required to pay substantial amounts to respond to regulatory investigations or, if we do not prevail, damages or penalties arising from these legal proceedings. We also are subject to potential lawsuits under the federal False Claims Act or other federal and state whistleblower statutes designed to combat fraud and abuse in our industry. Theseindustry including the federal False Claims Act litigation discussed in Part I, Item 3 hereof “Legal Proceedings.” This and other similar lawsuits can involve significant monetary awards or penalties which may not be covered by our insurance. If our third-party insurance coverage and self-insurance coverage reserves are not adequate to cover these claims, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Even if we are successful in our defense, civil lawsuits or regulatory proceedings could distract us from running our business or irreparably damage our reputation.

Our insurance liability coverage may not be sufficient for our business needs.

Although we maintain insurance consistent with industry practice, the insurance we maintain may not be sufficient to satisfy all claims made against us. For example, we have a $350,000 deductible per person/per occurrence under our workers’ compensation insurance program. We cannot assure you that claims will not be made in the future in excess of the limits of our insurance, and any such claims, if successful and in excess of such limits, may have a material adverse effect on our business or assets. We utilize historical data to estimate our reserves for our insurance programs. If losses on asserted claims exceed the current insurance coverage and accrued reserves, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. Changes in our annual insurance costs and self-insured retention limits depend in large part on the insurance market, and insurance coverage may not continue to be available to us at commercially reasonable rates, in adequate amounts or on satisfactory terms.

Inclement weather or natural disasters may impact our ability to provide services.

Inclement weather may prevent our employees from providing authorized services. We are not paid for authorized services that are not delivered due to these weather events. Furthermore, prolonged inclement weather or the occurrence of natural disasters in the markets in which we operate could disrupt our relationships with consumers, employees and referral sources located in affected areas and, in the case of our corporate office, our ability to provide administrative support services, including billing and collection services. For example, our corporate headquarters and a number of our agencies are located in the Midwestern United States, New York and California, increasing our exposure to blizzards and other major snowstorms, ice storms, tornados,tornadoes, flooding and earthquakes. Severe weather experienced during JanuaryThe impact of disasters and February of 2014 may negatively impact revenues in the first quarter of 2014.similar events is inherently uncertain. Future inclement weather or natural disasters may adversely affect our reputation, business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our business depends on our information systems. Our operations may be disrupted if we are unable to effectively integrate, manage and maintain the security of our information systems.

Our business depends on effective and secure information systems that assist us in, among other things, gathering information to improve the quality of consumer care, optimizing financial performance, adjusting consumer mix, monitoring regulatory compliance and enhancing staff efficiency. We rely on an external service

provider, McKesson, to provide continual maintenance, upgrading and enhancement of our primary information systems used for our operational needs. The software we license from McKesson supports intake, personnel scheduling, office clinical and centralized billing and receivables management in an integrated database, enabling us to standardize the care delivered across our network of locations and monitor our performance and consumer outcomes. To the extent that McKesson becomes insolvent or fails to support the software or systems, or if we lose our license with McKesson, our operations could be negatively affected.

We anticipate the payroll conversion to ADP to be complete in 2017. To the extent the conversion is delayed or ADP fails to provide support services to ensure the conversion is successfully completed, we could experience an increase in cost as well as a delay in acquisition integration. Either of these outcomes could negatively affect our operations.

WeOur business also depend upondepends on a proprietarycomprehensive payroll managementand human resources system that includes a feature for general ledger population,basic payroll functions and reporting, payroll tax reporting, managing wage assignments and garnishments, on-site check printing,garnishments. We rely on an external service provider, Ultimate Software, to provide continual maintenance, upgrading and direct-deposit paychecks. If we experience a reduction or interruption in the performance, reliability or availabilityenhancement of our informationprimary human resource and payroll systems. To the extent that Ultimate Software fails to support the software or systems, or fail to restoreany of the related support services provided by them, our information systems after such a reduction or interruption, ourinternal operations and ability to produce timely and accurate reports could be adverselynegatively affected. The operation of this system is dependent on the knowledge and talents of a limited number of company employees. Should these individuals terminate their employment, our ability to adequately support or maintain the system could be materially affected. We expect to replace our proprietary payroll system with a new system provided by an outside vendor during 2014. If we experience any disruptions in service during the transition to the outside vendor, our ability to produce timely and accurate reports could be adversely affected.

Because of the confidential health information and consumer records we store and transmit, loss of electronically-stored information for any reason could expose us to a risk of regulatory action, litigation and liability.

If we experience a reduction in the performance, reliability, or availability of our information systems, our operations and ability to process transactions and produce timely and accurate reports could be adversely affected. If we experience difficulties with the transition and integration of information systems or are unable to implement, maintain, or expand our systems properly, we could suffer from, among other things, operational disruptions, regulatory problems, and increases in administrative expenses.

We do not have full redundancybackup of all of our key information systems. Should our support centermain datacenter become inoperable as a resultbecause of a natural disaster or terrorist acts, itour operations would take substantial amountfailover to our geographically separate disaster recovery datacenter with a quick return to operations for all sites and systems. All of timeour sites and resourcesbranch offices have redundant connections to restore our primary and backup datacenters using data lines and cellular connections through VPN or MPLS.

The key business functions for our main sites also have redundancies with key functions geographically split between our two main facilities, should one not be available due to the currentabove mentioned scenarios.

While we believe these measures are reasonable, no system of information security is able to eliminate the risk of business disruptions.

A cyber-attack or security breach could cause a loss of confidential consumer data, give rise to remediation and other expenses, expose us to liability under HIPAA, consumer protection laws, common law or other legal theories, subject us to litigation and federal and state of operation. This risk is becoming even more critical as we are centralizing moregovernmental inquiries, damage our reputation, and otherwise be disruptive to our business.

We rely extensively on our computer systems to manage clinical and financial data, to communicate with our consumers, payors, vendors and other third parties, and to summarize and analyze our operating results. In spite of our business operations. The disruptionpolicies, procedures and other security measures used to the business would be material and would affectprotect our operational and financial performance.

Our business requires the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments could result in compromises or breaches of our security systems and consumer data, stored in our information systems. Anyone who circumvents our security measures could misappropriate our confidential information or cause interruptions in our services or operations. The Internet is a public network, and data is sent over this network from many sources. In the past, computer viruses or software programs that disable or impair computers have been distributed and have rapidly spread over the Internet. Computer viruses could be introduced into our systems which could disrupt our operations or make our systems inaccessible. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against the threat of security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by breaches. Our security measures may be inadequate to prevent security breaches, and our business operations would be negatively impacted by cancellation of contracts and loss of consumers if security breaches are not prevented.

The agreements that govern our credit facility contain various covenants that limit our discretion in the operation of our business and we have agreed to negotiate new terms.

Our credit facility agreement requires us to comply with customary financial and non-financial covenants. The financial covenants require us to maintain a maximum fixed charge ratio and a maximum leverage ratio, and limit our capital expenditures. Our credit facility also includes non-financial covenants including restrictions on our ability to:

transfer assets, enter into mergers, make acquisitions or experience fundamental changes;

make investments, loans and advances;

incur additional indebtedness and guarantee obligations;

create liens on assets;

enter into affiliate transactions;

enter into transactions other than in the ordinary course of business;

incur capital lease obligations; and

make capital expenditures.

We agreed, as a condition to receiving our lender’s consent to the sale of the Home Health Business, to renegotiate the terms of our current credit facility, including a potential reduction in the amount of the maximum revolving loan limit and commitment. We are in the process of renegotiating our credit facility and there can be no assurancesassurance that we will not be ablesubject to obtain financing on terms that are as favorable as our current credit facility. Thiscyber-attacks or security breaches in the future. Such attacks or breaches could result in a reductionloss of protected patient medical data or other information subject to privacy laws or disrupt our available creditinformation technology systems or increasesbusiness, potentially exposing us to regulatory action, litigation and liability. We continue to prioritize cyber-security and the development of practices and controls to protect our costs. These changes alongsystems and data. We utilize sophisticated firewalls to mitigate external threats and attacks through daily security content updates and intrusion prevention policies. In addition, all email is scanned for threats and viruses as well as Domain Keys Identified Mail (DKIM) keys authentication and Sender Policy Framework (SPF) records are utilized to mitigate spoofing and phishing attempts. Outgoing email is encrypted based on content and HIPAA regulations. In addition,

we are required to comply with the restrictionsprivacy and security laws and regulations of HIPAA as amended by HITECH. If our privacy and security practices are not in our current credit facilitycompliance with HIPAA and/or if we fail to satisfy applicable breach notification requirements in the event of a security breach, we could imposebe subject to significant operatingfines and financial restrictionspenalties. Penalties under HIPAA can be as high as $55,910 per violation (with an annual maximum of $1,677,299 per provision violated) depending on our ability to take actions that may be in our best interests.the degree of culpability.

Our current principal stockholders could have significant influence over us, and they could delay, deter or prevent a change of control or other business combination or otherwise cause us to take action with which you might not agree.

Eos Capital Partners III, L.P. and Eos Partners SBIC III, L.P.L.P (the “Eos Funds”), or the Eos Funds, together beneficially own approximately 36.9%34.0% of our outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2013.2016. As a result, the Eos Funds have the ability to significantly influence all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including:

 

changes to the composition of our board of directors, which has the authority to direct our business and appoint and remove our officers;

 

proposed mergers, consolidations or other business combinations; and

 

amendments to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws which govern the rights attached to our shares of common stock.

In addition, Mark First, one of our directors is affiliated with the Eos Funds.

This concentration of ownership of shares of our common stock could delay or prevent proxy contests, mergers, tender offers, open-market purchase programs or other purchases of shares of our common stock that might otherwise give you the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of our common stock. The interests of the Eos Funds may not always coincide with the interests of the other holders of our common stock. This concentration of ownership may also adversely affect our stock price.

We may not be able to attract, train and retain qualified personnel.

We must attract and retain qualified personnel in the markets in which we operate in order to provide our services. We compete for personnel with other providers of social and medical services as well as companies in other service-based industries. Competition may be greater for skilled personnel, such as regional and agency directors. Our ability to attract and retain personnel depends on several factors, including our ability to provide employees with attractive assignments and competitive benefits and salaries.

The loss of one or more of the members of the executive management team or the inability of a new management team to successfully execute our strategies may adversely affect our business. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, we may be unable to provide our services, the quality of our services may decline, and we could lose consumers and referral sources.

We may be more vulnerable to the effects of a public health catastrophe than other businesses due to the nature of our consumers.

The majority of our consumers are older individuals with complex medical challenges, many of whom may be more vulnerable than the general public during a pandemic or in a public health catastrophe. Our employees are also at greater risk of contracting contagious diseases due to their increased exposure to vulnerable consumers. For example, if a flu pandemic were to occur, we could suffer significant losses to our consumer population or a reduction in the availability of our employees and, at a high cost, be required to hire replacements for affected workers. Accordingly, certain public health catastrophes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We depend on the services of our executive officers and other key employees.

Our success depends upon the continued employment of certain members of our senior management team. We also depend upon the continued employment of the individuals that manage several of our key functional areas, including operations, business development, accounting, finance, human resources, marketing, information systems, contracting and compliance. We have recently changed a majority of the members of senior management, beginning with our CEO. The departure of any member of our senior management team may materially adversely affect our operations.

If we were required to write down all or part of our goodwill and/or our intangible assets, our net earnings and net worth could be materially adversely affected.

Goodwill and intangible assets with finite lives represent a significant portion of our assets. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of net assets acquired in business combinations. IfFor example, if our market capitalization drops significantly below the amount of net equity recorded on our balance sheet, it might indicate a decline in our fair value and would require us to further evaluate whether our goodwill has been impaired. If as part of our annual review of goodwill and intangibles, we were required to write down all or a significant part of our goodwill and/or intangible assets, our net earnings and net worth could be materially adversely affected, which could affect our flexibility to obtain additional financing. In addition, if our assumptions used in preparing our valuations of our reporting units for purposes of impairment testing differ materially from actual future results, we may record impairment charges in the future and our financial results may be materially adversely affected. We had $60.0$73.9 million and $68.8 million of goodwill and $8.8$15.4 million and $10.4 million of intangible assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheetConsolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2013.2016 and 2015, respectively.

It is not possible at this time to determine if there will be any future impairment charge, or if there is, whether such charges would be material. We will continue to review our goodwill and other intangible assets for possible impairment. We cannot be certain that a downturn in our business or changes in market conditions will not result in an impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets and the recognition of resulting expenses in future periods, which could adversely affect our results of operations for those periods.

Compliance with changing regulations including specific program compliance, corporate governance and public disclosure will result in additional expenses and pose challenges for our management team.

The state agencies that contract for our services require our compliance with various rules and regulations affecting the services we provide. We have a compliance officer who monitors and reports on our efforts for achieving the desired results. State agencies are recommending increased rules and regulations in an effort to control the growth of these programs and their overall costs. The implementation of these changes may require the Company to increase their efforts to remain compliant, may reduce the authorizations for services to be provided, may result in certain consumers no longer being eligible for our services all of which may result in lower revenues and increased costs, reducing our operating performance and profitability. If we continue to serve our consumers without addressing these increased regulations we are at risk for non-compliance with program requirements and potential penalties.

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC regulations, have created uncertainty for public companies and significantly increased the costs and risks associated with accessing the U.S. public markets. We are committed to maintaining high standards of internal controls over financial reporting, corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we intend to continue to invest appropriate resources to comply with evolving standards, and this investment has resulted and will likely continue to result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

Restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness may adversely affect us.

Our credit facility and the indentures governing our outstanding notes contain various covenants that limit our ability to take certain actions, including our ability to:

incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness;

issue redeemable stock and preferred stock;

repurchase capital stock;

make restricted payments, including paying dividends and making certain loans and investments;

redeem debt that is subordinated in right of payment to our outstanding notes;

create liens;

sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries;

enter into agreements that restrict dividends and certain other payments from subsidiaries;

merge, consolidate, sell or otherwise dispose of substantially all our assets;

enter into transactions with affiliates; and

guarantee certain obligations.

In addition, our credit facility contains restrictive covenants and requires us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial condition tests. Our ability to meet these restrictive covenants and financial ratios and tests may be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will meet those tests.

A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under our credit facility and the indentures governing our outstanding notes. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under our credit facility or the indentures governing our outstanding notes, all amounts outstanding under our credit facility and our outstanding notes may become immediately due and payable and all commitments under the credit facility to extend further credit may be terminated. The acceleration of any such indebtedness will result in an event of default under all of our other long-term indebtedness.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

The market price of our common stock may be volatile and this may adversely affect our stockholders.

The price at which our common stock trades may be volatile. The stock market has recently experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices of all securities, including securities of health carehealthcare companies. The market price of our common stock may be influenced by many factors, including:

 

our operating and financial performance;

 

variances in our quarterly financial results compared to expectations;

 

the depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock;

 

we have a relatively small base of registered shares of common stock consisting of the 5.4 million shares we issued in our initial public offering (“IPO”), which represents approximately 49.5% of our total common shares outstanding, that could result in significant stock price movements upward or downward based on low levels of trading volume in our common stock;

future sales of common stock or debt or the perception that sales could occur;

 

investor perception of our business and our prospects;

developments relating to litigation or governmental investigations;

changes or proposed changes in health care laws or regulations or enforcementthe occurrence of these laws and regulations, or announcements relating to these matters;risks impacting our company, including any of the risk factors set forth herein; or

 

general economic and stock market conditions.

In addition, the stock market in general has experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of homecare companies. These broad market and industry factors may materially reduce the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, securities class-action litigation has often been brought against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their respective securities. We have been and may become involved in this type of litigation in the future. Litigation of this type is often expensive to defend and may divert our management team’s attention as well as resources from the operation of our business.

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend solely on appreciation in the price of our common stock.

We do not pay dividends on our shares of common stock and intend to retain all future earnings to finance the continued growth and development of our business and for general corporate purposes. In addition, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future payment of cash dividends will depend upon our financial condition, capital requirements, credit facility limitations, earnings and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Our credit facility restricts our ability to declare or pay any dividend or other distribution unless no default then exists or would occur as a result thereof, we are in pro forma compliance with the financial covenants contained in the credit facility after giving effect thereto, we have an excess availability of at least 40% of the revolving credit commitment under the credit facility and the aggregate amount of dividends and distributions paid in any fiscal year does not exceed $5.0 million.

If securities or industry analysts fail to publish research or reports about our business or publish negative research or reports, or our results are below analysts’ estimates, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock may depend in part on the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If analysts fail to publish reports on us regularly or at all, we could fail to gain visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline. If one or more analysts do cover us and downgrade their evaluations of our stock or our results are below analysts’ estimates, our stock price would likely decline. In addition, due to the small number of analysts covering us, a single comment or report from one of the analysts whether positive or negative, could result in a significant increase or decrease in our stock price.

Provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware lawor certain other state laws could delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws and anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, could discourage, delay or prevent an unsolicited change in control of our company, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock. These provisions may also have the effect of making it more difficult for third parties to replace our current management without the consent of the board of directors. Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws that could delay or prevent an unsolicited change in control include:

 

a staggered board of directors;

 

limitations on persons authorized to call a special meeting of stockholders; and

 

the authorization of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval.

As a Delaware corporation, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. This section generally prohibits us from engaging in mergers and other business combinations with stockholders that beneficially own 15% or more of our voting stock, or with their affiliates, unless our directors or stockholders approve the business combination in the prescribed manner. However, because the Eos Funds acquired their shares prior to our IPO, Section 203 is currently inapplicable to any business combination with the Eos Funds or their affiliates. In addition, our amended and restated bylaws require that any stockholder proposals or nominations for election to our board of directors must meet specific advance notice requirements and procedures, which make it more difficult for our stockholders to make proposals or director nominations.

If Certain states in which we fail to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, our business and stock price could be adversely impacted.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, requires our management to report on, and requires our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. Compliance with SEC regulations adopted pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has increased our legal and financial compliance costs making some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and may also place strain on our personnel, systems and resources.

Compliance with public reporting and Sarbanes-Oxley Act requirements requires us to continually evaluate the adequacy of, and in some cases expand our compliance, accounting and finance staff. As a result of our increased stock price and overall market valueoperate, such as of the end of the second quarter of 2013, we became subject to the requirements of Section 404 of Sarbanes Oxley. Accordingly, we are now required to have an audit of our internal controls over financial reporting. We believe that material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting existed as of December 31, 2013, principally related to general controls over our information technology, including user access and change management activities and to overall controls related to our payroll system and related processes. We will engage an expert consultant to assist in enhancing the controls over our information technology; in addition, we have selected the vendor for a new payroll system that will address the control issues in that area and will engage an expert consultant to assist in the implementation. Implementing any appropriate changes to our internal controlsNew York, may require specific compliance trainingregulatory approval of our directors, officers and employees, entail substantial costs to modify our existing accounting systems, and take a significant periodpersons meeting such states’ definition of time to complete. Such changes may not, however, be effective in maintaining the adequacy of our internal controls, and any failure to maintain that adequacy,“controlling persons” or consequent inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis, could increase our operating costs and could materially impair our ability to operate our business. Moreover, if we fail to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 on a timely basis, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny and sanctions, our ability to raise capital could be impaired, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and our stock price could be adversely affected.

Compliance with changing regulations including specific program compliance, corporate governance and public disclosure will result in additional expenses and pose challenges for our management team.

The state agencies that contract for our services require our compliance with various rules and regulations affecting the services we provide. We have a compliance officer who monitors and reports on our efforts for achieving the desired results. State agencies are recommending increased rules and regulations in an effort to control the growth of these programs and their overall costs. The implementation of these changes may require the Company to increase their efforts to remain compliant, may reduce the authorizations for services to be provided, may result in certain consumers no longer being eligible for our services all of which may result in lower revenues and increased costs, reducing our operating performance and profitability. If we continue to serve our consumers without addressing these increased regulations we are at risk for non-compliance with program requirements and potential penalties.

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the rules and regulations promulgated there-under, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC regulations, have created uncertainty for public companies and significantly increased the costs and risks associated with accessing the U.S. public markets. We are committed to maintaining high standards of internal controls over financial reporting, corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we intend to continue to invest appropriate resources to comply with evolving standards, and this investment has resulted and will likely continue to result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

Declines in earnings could create future liquidity problems.

The availability of funds under the revolving credit portion of our credit facility is based on the lesser of (i) the product of adjusted EBITDA, as defined, for the most recent 12-month period multiplied by the specified advance multiple, up to 3.25, less the outstanding senior indebtedness and letters of credit or (ii) $55.0 million less the outstanding revolving loans and letters of credit. As of December 31, 2013 our total availability under our credit facility was $42.4 million.

The current Federal and state economic and reimbursement environments and state budgetary pressures to decrease or eliminate services we provide could negatively affect our future earnings. This decrease in earnings would reduce the availability of funds under our credit facilitysimilar concepts, which could havedelay or deter a negative impact on our future operating results.change of control or other business combination with us.

 

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

 

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

We do not own any real property. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we operated at 122120 leased properties including our National Support Center. Homesupport centers. Personal care and community basedadult day services are operated out of 121114 of these facilities. As part of the sale of the Home Health Business, a portion of 135 of the facilities wereare currently subleased to the Purchasers. We lease approximately 27,00059,000 and 12,000 square feet of an office buildingspace in Palatine,Downers Grove, Illinois and Frisco, Texas which servestogether serve as our corporate headquarters. In 2016, the contact center contained within the Downers Grove corporate headquarters fromclosed. As a former member of our board of directors and the former Chairman of Addus HealthCare. We have entered into a new lease forresult, approximately 59,00021,000 square feet of anthe office building locatedspace in Downers Grove IL to become our new corporate headquarters. We will assume occupancyis unused and related lease payments are included in May of 2014 at which time our arrangement with the former board memberrestructuring and Chairman of Addus HealthCare will terminate.other expenses.

 

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we are subject to claimslegal and/or administrative proceedings incidental to our business. It is the opinion of management that the outcome of pending legal and/or administrative proceedings will not have a material effect on our financial position and suits arisingresults of operations.

On January 20, 2016, we were served with a lawsuit that was filed in the ordinary courseUnited States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the Company and Cigna Corporation by Stop Illinois Marketing Fraud, LLC, a qui tam relator formed for the purpose of bringing this action. In the action, the plaintiff alleges, inter alia, violations of the federal False Claims Act relating primarily to allegations of violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and allegedly improper referrals of patients from our home care division to our home health business, substantially all of which was sold in 2013. The plaintiff seeks to recover damages, fees and costs under the federal False Claims Act including treble damages, civil penalties and its attorneys’ fees. The U.S. government has declined to intervene at this time. Plaintiff amended its complaint on April 4, 2016 to include additional allegations in support of its False Claims Act claims, including alleged violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. We and Cigna Corporation filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on June 6, 2016. Plaintiff filed its opposition to our motion on July 22, 2016. Our reply in further support of the motion to dismiss was filed on August 23, 2016. On February 3, 2017, the Court granted Cigna Corporation’s motion to dismiss in full, and granted our motion to dismiss in part allowing Plaintiff another chance to amend its complaint. Plaintiff timely filed a second amended complaint on March 10, 2017, withdrawing its conspiracy claim under the Federal False Claims Act and adding an explicit claim under the Illinois False Claims Act for damages for personal injuries. In our management’s opinion, the ultimate resolution of any of these pending claimssame underlying kickback allegations. We intend to continue to defend the litigation vigorously and legal proceedingsbelieve the case will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial positioncondition or results of operations.

On May 4, 2016, Addus HealthCare, together with 59 other social service and healthcare providers in the State of Illinois, filed an action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois against certain individuals in their official capacities as agents of the Illinois Department of Human Services, the Illinois Department on Aging, the

Illinois Department of Public Health, the Illinois Department of HealthCare and Family Services, the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, the Illinois Department of Corrections and the Illinois Department of Central Management Services, including the Governor of Illinois. On July 20, 2016, a third amended complaint was filed by the plaintiffs, who now comprise 97 similarly situated providers and provider organizations. In the action, the plaintiffs, including Addus HealthCare, allege to have entered into contracts with the various defendants based in part on the Governor’s proposed budget, which provided for funding for the services to be provided by plaintiffs thereunder. The Governor subsequently vetoed all of the relevant appropriations bills on June 25, 2015, and again vetoed an appropriations bill that included funding for the contracts on June 10, 2016. While the defendant officer and agency heads have continued to enforce such contracts, since August 1, 2016, we received an aggregate of approximately $65.4 million in payments from the State of Illinois from the stopgap budget enacted on June 30, 2016. In those actions, plaintiffs alleged the defendant officers and agency heads acted beyond the scope of their legal authority in entering into and enforcing contracts with no intent to perform under such contracts by failing to pay amounts due thereunder when due. The action also alleged that the

Governor of Illinois’ veto of appropriations for such contracts violated the Illinois Constitution. Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief to require payment of overdue bills to prevent irreparable harm, including imperiling the State’s infrastructure for delivery of human services. On August 31, 2016, the Court denied plaintiffs’ petitions for declaratory and injunctive relief and dismissed the actions with prejudice. Plaintiffs timely filed a notice of appeal on September 30, 2016.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

 

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock has been trading on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “ADUS” since our IPO on October 27, 2009. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our common stock. The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share on any matter to be voted upon by stockholders. All shares of common stock rank equally as to voting and all other matters. The table below sets forth the high and low sales prices for our common stock, as reported by The NASDAQ Global Market, for each of the periods indicated.

 

  High   Low   High   Low 

2013

    

2016

    

Fourth Quarter

  $32.40    $21.13    $36.30   $24.40 

Third Quarter

   29.94     17.62     27.43    17.35 

Second Quarter

   20.72     11.17     21.60    16.55 

First Quarter

   14.07     7.12     24.86    15.33 

2012

    

2015

    

Fourth Quarter

  $7.49    $5.25    $38.08   $18.75 

Third Quarter

   5.38     4.29     35.83    25.00 

Second Quarter

   5.30     3.67     29.19    22.86 

First Quarter

   5.05     3.21     24.68    20.64 

Holders

As of December 31, 2013, 46.4%2016, 37.6% of our shares were held by Company insiders. An additional 23.9%60.5% of the stock was held by 10172 institutional investors. We cannot estimate the total numberAs of holdersFebruary 17, 2017, Addus HomeCare Corporation had approximately 2,400 shareholders, including 18 shareholders of the shares of our company.record.

Dividends

Historically, weWe have notnever paid dividends on our common stock, including in the two most recent fiscal years, and we currently do not intend to pay any dividends on our common stock.stock in the foreseeable future. We currently plan to retain any earnings to support the operation, and to finance the growth, of our business rather than to pay cash dividends. Payments of any cash dividends in the future will depend on our financial condition, results of operations and capital requirements, credit facility limitations, earnings, as well as other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Our credit facility restricts our ability to declare or pay any dividend or other distribution unless no default then exists or would occur as a result thereof, and we are in pro forma compliance with the financial covenants contained in ourthe credit facility after giving effect thereto.thereto, we have an excess availability of at least 40% of the revolving credit commitment under the credit facility and the aggregate amount of dividends and distributions paid in any fiscal year does not exceed $5.0 million.

Equity Compensation Plan

The following table presents securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans at December 31, 2013.2016.

 

Plan Category

  Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights (1)
   Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights (2)
   Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected in
the First Column) (3)
   Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights (1)
   Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights (2)
   Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected in
the First Column) (3)
 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

   717,588    $8.80     1,681,750     404,757   $19.71    598,442 

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

   —       —       —       —      —      —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   717,588    $8.80     1,681,750     404,757   $19.71    598,442 

 

(1)Includes both grants of stock options and unvested share awards.options.

 

(2)Includes weighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock options only.

 

(3)Represents shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to our 2006 stock incentive plan (the “2006 Plan”) or our 2009 stock incentive plan (the “2009 Plan”). We do not plan on issuing any further grants under the 2006 Plan. There are 852,791 shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to the 2009 Plan.

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected financial information derived from our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements for the periods and at the dates indicated. The information is qualified in its entirety by and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

  For the Year Ended December 31,  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2013 2012 2011 2010 2009  2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 
  (in thousands, except per share data)  (Amounts In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

      

Consolidated Statements of Income Data:

     

Net service revenues (1)

  $265,941   $244,315   $230,105   $230,099   $219,921   $400,688  $336,815  $312,942  $265,941  $244,315 

Cost of service revenues

   198,202    180,264    168,632    170,376    162,734    294,593   245,492   229,207   198,202   180,264 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   67,739    64,051    61,473    59,723    57,187    106,095   91,323   83,735   67,739   64,051 

General and administrative expenses (4)

   50,118    46,362    45,858    47,042    45,137    84,213   70,452   61,834   50,118   46,362 

Revaluation of contingent consideration (6)

   —      —      (469  5,011    —      —     130   —     —     —   

Gain on sale of agency

   —      (495  —      —      —      —     —     —     —     (495

Depreciation and amortization

   2,160    2,521    3,167    3,408    4,144    6,647   4,717   3,830   2,160   2,521 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total operating expenses

   52,278    48,388    48,556    50,450    49,281    90,860   75,299   65,664   52,278   48,388 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income from continuing operations

   15,461    15,663    12,917    9,273    7,906    15,235   16,024   18,071   15,461   15,663 

Interest income (7)

   (188  (155  (2,263  (155  —    

Interest expense (2)

   674    1,723    2,524    3,159    6,773  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total interest expense, net

   486    1,568    261    3,004    6,773  

Interest income (2)

  (2,812  (47  (18  (188  (155

Interest expense

  2,332   786   698   674   1,723 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total interest (income) expense, net

  (480  739   680   486   1,568 

Other income

  206   —     —     —     —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

   14,975    14,095    12,656    6,269    1,133    15,921   15,285   17,391   14,975   14,095 

Income tax expense (benefit)

   3,812    4,807    4,244    1,902    (94

Income tax expense

  3,994   3,932   5,428   3,812   4,807 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

   11,163    9,288    8,412    4,367    1,227    11,927   11,353   11,963   11,163   9,288 

Less: Preferred stock dividends, undeclared subject to payment upon conversion; declared and converted in November 2009

   —      —      —      —      (5,387

Discontinued Operations

     

Net income (loss) from Home Health Business (3)

  97   270   280   (980  (1,653

Gain on sale of Home Health Business, net of tax

  —     —     —     8,962   —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders

   11,163    9,288    8,412    4,367    (4,160

Earnings (losses) from discontinued operations

  97   270   280   7,982   (1,653
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Discontinued Operations

      

Net income (loss) from home health business (5)

   (980  (1,653  (10,393  1,661    2,375  

Gain on sale of home health business, net of tax

   8,962    —      —      —      —    
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income (losses) from discontinued operations

   7,982    (1,653  (10,393  1,661    2,375  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss)

  $19,145   $7,635   $(1,981 $6,028   $(1,785
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income

 $12,024  $11,623  $12,243  $19,145  $7,635 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Basic income (loss) per common share:

           

Continuing operations

  $1.03   $0.86   $0.78   $0.41   $(1.54 $1.05  $1.03  $1.10  $1.03  $0.86 

Discontinued operations

   0.74    (0.15  (0.96  0.16    0.88    0.01   0.03   0.02   0.74   (0.15
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Basic income (loss) per common share:

  $1.77   $0.71   $(0.18 $0.57   $(0.66
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Basic income per common share:

 $1.06  $1.06  $1.12  $1.77  $0.71 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted income (loss) per common share:

           

Continuing operations

  $1.01   $0.86   $0.78   $0.41   $(1.54 $1.05  $1.02  $1.08  $1.01  $0.86 

Discontinued operations

   0.72    (0.15  (0.96  0.16    0.88    0.01   0.02   0.02   0.72   (0.15
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted income (loss) per common share:

  $1.73   $0.71   $(0.18 $0.57   $(0.66
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted income per common share:

 $1.06  $1.04  $1.10  $1.73  $0.71 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding:

           

Basic

   10,826    10,764    10,752    10,604    2,707    11,292   10,986   10,900   10,826   10,764 

Diluted

   11,075    10,784    10,752    10,606    2,707    11,349   11,189   11,114   11,075   10,784 

  For the Year Ended December 31,  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2013 2012 2011 2010 2009  2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 

Key Metrics:

      
 (Actual Numbers, Except Adjusted EBITDA and Billable Hours
in Thousands)
 

Key Metrics :

 

General:

           

Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands) (3)

  $18,136   $18,525   $16,415   $12,936   $12,347  

Adjusted EBITDA (4)

 $32,094  $23,627  $23,759  $18,796  $18,525 

States served at period end

   21    19    19    19    16    24   22   22   21   19 

Locations at period end

   121    96    96    107    101    114   119   129   121   96 

Employees at period end

   16,585    13,836    12,463    11,716    10,940    23,070   21,395   18,054   16,585   13,836 

Operational Data:

           

Average billable census

   26,802    25,104    23,877    23,743    22,768    33,944   32,756   31,019   26,802   25,104 

Billable hours (in thousands)

   15,621    14,388    13,504    13,599    13,377  

Billable hours

  23,088   19,556   18,335   15,621   14,388 

Average billable hours per census per month

   49    48    47    48    49    57   50   49   49   48 

Billable hours per business day

   59,850    55,126    51,938    52,103    51,253    88,460   75,214   71,903   59,850   55,126 

Revenues per billable hour

  $17.02   $16.98   $17.04   $16.92   $16.44   $17.35  $17.22  $17.07  $17.02  $16.98 

Percentage of Revenues by Payor:

           

State, local or other governmental

   94  95  94  93  94

Commercial

   2    1    1    1    1  

Private duty

   4    4    5    6    5  

State, local and other governmental programs

  71  78  87  94  95

Managed care organizations

  26   18   9   1   —   

Private pay

  2   3   3   4   4 

Commercial insurance

  1   1   1   1   1 
  December 31,  As of December 31, 
  2013 2012 2011 2010 2009  2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 
  (in thousands)  (Amounts In Thousands) 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

           

Cash

  $15,565   $1,737   $2,020   $816   $518   $8,013  $4,104  $13,363  $15,565  $1,737 

Accounts receivable, net of allowances

   61,354    71,303    72,368    70,954    70,491    116,999   84,959   68,333   61,354   71,303 

Goodwill and intangibles

   68,788    56,906    58,739    77,500    72,564    89,319   79,195   74,567   68,788   56,906 

Total assets

   163,934    149,857    154,692    166,924    161,315    231,030   185,797   180,803   163,934   149,857 

Total debt

   —      16,458    31,527    45,185    49,239  

Capital lease obligations

  2,433   2,991   3,663   —     —   

Term loan, net of debt issuance costs

  22,580   —     —     —     16,458 

Stockholders’ equity

   113,856    94,417    86,441    88,091    80,567    158,928   141,726   127,956   113,856   94,417 

 

(1)Acquisitions completed in 20132016 accounted for $1.7$52.7 million of growth in net service revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2013.2016. Acquisitions completed in 2010 included in 20112015 accounted for $4.9$11.6 million and $9.7 million of growth in net service revenues from continuing operations for the yearyears ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010,2016 and included $4.62015, respectively. Acquisitions completed in 2014 accounted for $8.8 million, $10.7 million and $7.5 million of growth in net service revenues from continuing operations for the yearyears ended December 31, 2010 compared to2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Acquisitions completed in 2013 accounted for $25.8 million, $24.6 million, $21.9 million and $1.7 million of growth in net service revenues from continuing operations for the yearyears ended December 31, 2009.2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

(2)Legislation enacted in Illinois entitles designated service program providers to receive a prompt payment interest penalty based on qualifying services approved for payment that remain unpaid after a designated period of time. As the amount and timing of the receipt of these payments are not certain, the interest income is recognized when received. We recorded $2.8 million in prompt payment interest income for the year ended December 31, 2016, no prompt payment interest income for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and $0.2 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

(3)During 2009December 2012, in anticipation of the sale of the Home Health Business we incurred one-time charges relating to our IPO which included $1.2 million of separation costs related toreported the former Chairman of Addus HealthCare which was charged to general and administrative expenses; a charge to interest expense pursuant to a contingent payment agreement in which an amount equal to $12.7 million was paid upon the completionoperating results of our IPO, of which $1.8 million was deemed interest expense; andHome Health Business as discontinued operations. On February 7, 2013, we entered into the write-off of $0.8 million in unamortized debt issuance costs relating to our former credit facility that was charged to interest expense.Home Health Purchase Agreement with the Purchasers.

 

(3)(4)We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before discontinued operations, interest expense, other non-operating income, taxes, depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation expense, M&A expense restructuring charges and preferred dividends.severance and other costs. Adjusted EBITDA is a performance measure used by management that is not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP)(“GAAP”). It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income, operating income or any other measure of financial performance calculated in accordance with GAAP.

Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors, management and others in evaluating our operating performance for the following reasons:

 

By reporting Adjusted EBITDA, we believe that we provide investors with insight and consistency in our financial reporting and present a basis for comparison of our business operations between current, past and future periods. Adjusted EBITDA allows management, investors and others to evaluate and compare our core operating results, including return on capital and operating efficiencies, from period to period, by removing the impact of our capital structure (interest expense), asset base (amortization and depreciation), tax consequences, stock-based compensation expense, M&A expense, restructuring charges and severance and other costs from our results of operations.

past and future periods. Adjusted EBITDA allows management, investors and others to evaluate and compare our core operating results, including return on capital and operating efficiencies, from period to period, by removing the impact of our capital structure (interest expense), asset base (amortization and depreciation), tax consequences and non-cash stock-based compensation expense from our results of operations, and also facilitates comparisons with the core results of our public company peers.

 

We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is a measure widely used by securities analysts, investors and others to evaluate the financial performance of other public companies, and therefore may be useful as a means of comparison with those companies, when viewed in conjunction with traditional GAAP financial measures.

 

We adopted ASC Topic 718 “Share-Based Payment,” on September 19, 2006, the effective date of our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”), and recorded stock-based compensation expense of $1.1 million, $1.6 million, $0.8 million, $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and $0.3 million per year for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 20092016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2008,2012, respectively. By comparing our Adjusted EBITDA in different periods, our investors can evaluate our operating results without stock-based compensation expense, which is a non-cash expense that is not a key measure of our operations.

In addition, management has chosen to use Adjusted EBITDA as a performance measure because the amount of non-cash expenses, such as depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense, may not directly correlate to the underlying performance of our business operations, and because such expenses can vary significantly from period to period as a result of new acquisitions, full amortization of previously acquired tangible and intangible assets or the timing of new stock-based awards, as the case may be. This facilitates internal comparisons to historical operating results, as well as external comparisons to the operating results of our competitors and other companies in the home and community basedpersonal care services industry. Because management believes Adjusted EBITDA is useful as a performance measure, management uses Adjusted EBITDA:

 

as one of our primary financial measures in the day-to-day oversight of our business to allocate financial and human resources across our organization, to assess appropriate levels of marketing and other initiatives and to generally enhance the financial performance of our business;

 

in the preparation of our annual operating budget, as well as for other planning purposes on a quarterly and annual basis, including allocations in order to implement our growth strategy, to determine appropriate levels of investments in acquisitions and to endeavor to achieve strong core operating results;

 

to evaluate the effectiveness of business strategies, such as the allocation of resources, the mix of organic growth and acquisitive growth and adjustments to our payor mix;

 

as a means of evaluating the effectiveness of management in directing our core operating performance, which we consider to be performance that can be affected by our management in any particular period through their allocation and use of resources that affect our underlying revenue and profit-generating operations during that period;

for the valuation of prospective acquisitions, and to evaluate the effectiveness of integration of past acquisitions into our company; and

 

in communications with our board of directors concerning our financial performance.

Although Adjusted EBITDA is frequently used by investors and securities analysts in their evaluations of companies, Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results of operations as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations include:

 

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or other contractual commitments;

 

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect interest expense or interest income;

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect other non-operating income from our investment in joint venture;

 

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash requirements for income taxes;

 

although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated or amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for these replacements;

 

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any goodwillstock based compensation; and intangible asset impairment

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any restructure charges;

 

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any revaluation of contingent consideration;severance and other costs;

 

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any preferred stock dividends;

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any stock based compensation; andIRS accrual adjustments;

 

other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Management compensates for these limitations by using GAAP financial measures in addition to Adjusted EBITDA in managing the day-to-day and long-term operations of our business. We believe that consideration of Adjusted EBITDA, together with a careful review of our GAAP financial measures, is the most informed method of analyzing our company.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to Adjusted EBITDAEBITDA:

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  2013 2012   2011 2010 2009   2016   2015   2014   2013   2012 
  (in thousands)   (Amounts In Thousands) 

Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss):

                 

Net income (loss)

  $19,145   $7,635    $(1,981 $6,028   $(1,785  $12,024   $11,623   $12,243   $19,145   $7,635 

Less: (Earnings) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

   (7,982  1,653     10,393    (1,661  (2,375   (97   (270   (280   (7,982   1,653 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

   11,163    9,288     8,412    4,367    (4,160   11,927    11,353    11,963    11,163    9,288 

Preferred stock dividends

   —      —       —      —      5,387  

Interest expense, net

   486    1,568     261    3,004    6,773  

Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations

   3,812    4,807     4,244    1,902    (94

Interest (income) expense, net

   (480   739    680    486    1,568 

Other non-operating income

   (206   —      —      —      —   

Income tax expense from continuing operations

   3,994    3,932    5,428    3,812    4,807 

Depreciation and amortization

   2,160    2,521     3,167    3,408    4,144     6,647    4,717    3,830    2,160    2,521 

M&A expenses

   1,122    1,013    1,031    660    —   

Stock-based compensation expense

   515    341     331    255    297     1,072    1,573    827    515    341 

Restructuring charges

   4,787    —      —      —      —   

Severance and other costs

   3,231    —      —      —      —   

IRS accrual

   —      300    —      —      —   
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA (1)

  $18,136   $18,525    $16,415   $12,936   $12,347    $32,094   $23,627   $23,759   $18,796   $18,525 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)The selected historical consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operationsIncome data for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and the balance sheet data as of December 31,2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012, were derived from our audited consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in thisthe Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected historical consolidated statements of operations data10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009 were derived from our audited consolidated financial statements which are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.applicable year.

(4)Adjusted EBITDA for 2009 includes a $1.2 million charge related to the separation agreement with the former Chairman of Addus HealthCare.

(5)During December 2012, in anticipation of the sale of the Home Health Business we reported the operating results of our Home Health Business as discontinued operations. On February 7, 2013, we entered into the Home Health Purchase Agreement with the Purchasers. In 2011, we determined that all of the $16.0 million allocated to goodwill and intangible assets for our home health reportable unit was impaired and recorded an impairment loss of $16.0 million.

(6)Adjusted EBITDA for 2011 includes a $0.5 million non-cash gain for the revaluation of contingent consideration originally estimated for the purchase of assets from Advantage.

(7)Legislation enacted in Illinois entitles designated service program providers to receive a prompt payment interest penalty based on qualifying services approved for payment that remain unpaid after a designated period of time. As the amount and timing of the receipt of these payments are not certain, the interest income is recognized when received. We recorded prompt payment interest income of $0.2 million, $0.2 million, $2.3 million and $0.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion together with our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements about our business and operations. Our actual results may differ materially from those we currently anticipate as a result of the factors we describe under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K and other risks.

Overview

We operate as one business segment and are a comprehensive provider of home and community basedcomprehensive personal care services, which are primarily social in nature and areprincipally provided in the home, focused on the dual eligible population.home. Our services include personal care andservices provide assistance with activities of daily living, and adult day care.living. Our consumers are individuals with special needsprimarily persons who are at risk of hospitalization or institutionalization, such as the elderly, chronically ill and disabled. Our payor clients include federal, state and local governmental agencies, managed care organizations, commercial insurers and private individuals. As of December 31, 2016, we provided personal care services to over 33,000 consumers through 114 locations across 24 states, including three adult day services centers in Illinois. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we served approximately 50,000, 48,000, and 43,000 discrete consumers, respectively.

A summary of our financial results for 2016, 2015 and 2014 is provided in the table below:

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2016   2015   2014 
   (Amounts in Thousands) 

Net service revenues – continuing operations

  $400,688   $336,815   $312,942 

Net service revenues – discontinued operations

   —      —      —   

Net income from continuing operations

   11,927    11,353    11,963 

Earnings from discontinued operations

   97    270    280 

Net income

  $12,024   $11,623   $12,243 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $231,030   $185,797   $180,803 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Our services are predominantly provided in the home under agreements with state and local government agencies. Our consumers are predominately “dual eligible,” meaning they are eligible to receive both Medicare and Medicaid benefits. The federal government permits states to initiate dual eligible demonstration programs and other managed Medicaid initiatives designed to coordinate the services provided through Medicare and Medicaid, with the overall objective of improving care quality and reducing costs. States are increasingly implementing managed care programs to deliver care for Medicaid enrollees. Managed care organizations have an economic incentive to better manage the healthcare expenditures of their membership, and therefore seek to provide care in a more cost-effective setting, such as a patient’s home. Managed care revenues account for 26.1%, 18.3% and 9.1% of our revenue mix for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The personal care services we provide include assistance with bathing, grooming, oral care, skincare, assistance with feeding and dressing, medication reminders, meal planning and preparation, housekeeping and transportation services and other activities of daily living. We provide these non-medical services on a long-term, continuous basis, with an average duration of approximately 26 months per consumer.

Our model is designed to improve consumer outcomes and satisfaction, as well as lower the cost of acute care treatment and reduce service duplication. We believe our model to be especially valuable to managed care organizations that have economic responsibility for both personal care services as well as acute care expenditures. Over the long term, we believe our model will be a differentiator and as a result we expect to receive increased referrals from managed care organizations.

We utilize home care aides to observe and report changes in the condition of our consumers for the purpose of early intervention in the disease process, with the goal of reducing the cost of medical services by preventing unnecessary emergency room visits and/or hospital admissions and re-admissions. We coordinate the services provided by our team with those of other healthcare agencies as appropriate. Changes in consumers’ conditions are evaluated by appropriately trained managers and may result in the condition being reported to the consumers’ case manager at the managed care organization or other payor, in some cases to the consumers’ primary care physicians for treatment or other follow-up. We believe this approach to the care of our consumers and the integration of our services into the broader healthcare continuum are attractive to managed care organizations and other payors who are ultimately responsible for the healthcare needs and costs of our consumers.

We utilize IVR systems and smart phone applications to communicate with the home care aides. Through these technologies we are able to identify changes in health conditions with automated alerts forwarded to an appropriate manager for triage and evaluation. In addition, we use the technology to record basic transaction information about each visit, record start and end times for a scheduled shift, track mileage reimbursement, text messages to the home care aide and communicate basic payroll information.

In addition to our focus on organic growth, we have been growing through over 121 locations across 21 statesselective acquisitions, which have expanded our presence in current markets or which have facilitated our entry into new markets where the personal care business has been moving to over 26,000 consumers.managed care organizations. We completed seven acquisitions during the period from December 2013 through December 2016.

Effective March 1, 2013, we sold substantially all of the assets used in our Home Health Business in Arkansas, Nevada and South Carolina, and 90% of the Home Health Business in California and Illinois, to the Purchasers for a cash purchase price of approximately $20$20.0 million. We retained a 10% ownership interest in the Home Health Business in California and Illinois. The assets sold included 19 home health agencies and two hospice agencies in five states. On December 30, 2013, we sold one home health agency in Pennsylvania for approximately $0.2 million. In November 2012, we ceased operations in a home health agency located in Idaho and abandoned efforts to sell this location in December 2013. Through our former home health agencies, we previously provided physical, occupational and speech therapy, as well as skilled nursing services, to pediatric, adult infirm and elderly patients. The results of the Home Health Business sold or held for sale are reflected as discontinued operations for all periods presented herein. Continuing operations include the results of operations previously included in our home & community segment and three agencies previously included in our home health segment. Following the sale of the Home Health Business, we managehave managed and internally reportreported our business in one segment.

We believemaintain licensure as a home health agency in Delaware and, in order to provide personal care services in the salestate, provide limited home health services reimbursable by Medicare. Until ceasing business in the State of theIndiana in August 2015, we also provided limited home health services reimbursable by Medicare in order to comply with regulatory requirements that personal care services be provided by a licensed home health agency. Priority Home Health Business substantially positions us for future growth. The sale allows us to focus both management and financial resources to address changes in the home and community based services industry and to address the needs of managed care organizations as they become responsible for the state sponsored programs. We have improved our financial performance by lowering our administrative costs and concentrating our efforts on the business that is growing and providing all of our profitability and disposing of the business that was unprofitable. We have improved our overall financial position by eliminating our debt and adding substantial amounts in cash reserves to our balance sheet.

A summary of our results for 2013, 2012 and 2011 are provided in the table below:

   2013   2012  2011 

Net service revenues – continuing operations

  $265,941    $244,315   $230,105  

Net service revenues – discontinued operations

   6,462     38,822    42,995  

Net income from continuing operations

   11,163     9,288    8,412  

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations

   7,982     (1,653  (10,393

Net income (loss)

  $19,145    $7,635   $(1,981
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $163,934    $149,857   $154,692  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

The home and community based services we provide are primarily social in nature and include assistance with bathing, grooming, dressing, personal hygiene and medication reminders, and other activities of daily living. We provide these services on a long-term, continuous basis, with an average duration of approximately 17

months per consumer. Our adult day centers provide a comprehensive program of skilled and support services and designated medical services for adults in a community-based group setting. Services provided by our adult day centers include social activities, transportation services to and from the centers, the provision of meals and snacks, personal care and therapeutic activities such as exercise and cognitive interaction.

We utilize a coordinated care model that is designed to enhance consumer outcomes and satisfaction as well as lower the cost of acute care treatment and reduce service duplication. Through our coordinated care model, we utilize our home care aides to observe and report changes in the condition of our consumers for the purpose of early intervention in the disease process, thereby preventing or reducing the cost of medical services by avoiding emergency room visits, and/or reducing the need of hospitalization. These changes in condition are evaluated by appropriately trained managers and referred to appropriate medical personnel including the primary care physicians and managed care plans for treatment and follow-up. We will coordinate the services provided by our team with those of selected health care agencies. We believe this approach to the provision of care to our consumers and the integration of our services into the broader healthcare industry is particularly attractive to managed care providers and others who are ultimately responsible for the healthcare needs of our consumers and over time will increase our business with them.

Our ability to grow our net service revenues is closely correlated with the number of consumers to whom we provide our services. Our continued growth depends on our ability to maintain our existing payor client relationships, establish relationships with new payors, enter into new contracts and increase our referral sources. Our continued growth is also dependent upon the authorization by state agencies of new consumers to receive our services. We believe there are several market opportunities for growth. The U.S. population of persons aged 65 and older is growing, and the U.S. Census Bureau estimates that this population will more than double by 2050. Additionally, we believe the overwhelming majority of individuals in need of care generally prefer to receive care in their homes or community-based settings. Finally, we believe the provision of home and community based services is more cost-effective than the provision of similar services in an institutional setting for long-term care.

We have historically grown our business primarily through organic growth, complemented with selective acquisitions. Our acquisitions have historically been focused on facilitating entry into new states.

We entered into two definitive acquisition agreements to acquire home and community based businesses during 2013 to further our presence in both existing states and to expand into new states. On October 17, 2013, we entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire the entire home and community based business of Medi Home Private Care, Division of Medical Services of America, Inc. The acquisition included two agencies located in South Carolina which closed effective November 1, 2013; four agencies located in Tennessee and two agencies located in Ohio, which closedalso maintains enrollment in January 2014. We also entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire the assets of Coordinated Home Health Care, LLC, a personal care business located in New Mexico, on November 7, 2013. The combined purchase price for these two acquisitions was $12.3 million at the close and a maximum of $2.3 million in future cash based on certain performance. The purchase included sixteen offices located in Southern New Mexico. The transaction closed effective December 1, 2013. The related acquisitions costs were $0.7 million for the Medi Home Private Care Division of Medical Services of America, Inc. and Coordinated Home Health Care, LLC deals, respectively.

On July 26, 2010, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which we acquired the operations and certain assets of Advantage Health Systems, Inc., a South Carolina corporation (“Advantage”). Advantage is a provider of home and community based services in South Carolina and Georgia, which expanded our services across 19 states. The total consideration payable pursuant to the Purchase Agreement was $8.3 million, comprised of $5.1 million in cash, common stock consideration with a deemed value of $1.2 million resulting in the issuance of 248,000 common shares, a maximum of $2.0 million in future cash consideration subject to the achievement of certain performance targets set forth in an earn-out agreement and the assumption of certain specified liabilities. In April 2011, we paid the first earn-out payment of

$0.5 million to the sellers of Advantage. During the fourth quarter of 2011 we completed a revaluation of the remaining contingent earn-out obligation and recorded a reduction of approximately $0.5 million with a remaining obligation of $0.7 million as of December 31, 2012. The final earn-out payment was made to Advantage for approximately $0.5 million on September 20, 2013.but does not derive significant revenues from Medicare.

Business

The results of the Home Health Business sold are reflected as discontinued operations for all periods presented herein. Continuing operations include the results of operations previously included in our home &and community segment and three agencies previously included in our home health segment. Following the sale of the Home Health Business, we manage and internally report our business in one segment. The following table presents our locations, acquisitions, start-ups and closures, exclusive of the Home Health Business for the period December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2013:

Total

Total December 31, 2011

107

Closed/Merged

(3

Total at December 31, 2012

104

Acquired

16

Start-up

2

Closed/Merged

(1

Total at December 31, 2013

121

As of December 31, 2013,2016, we provided our home and community basedpersonal care services through 121114 locations across 21 states.24 states, including three adult day services centers in Illinois. In order to focus on providing services to consumers in their homes, effective March 1, 2017, Addus ceased the adult day services businesses and sold substantially all of the assets used in our adult day services centers.

Our payor clients are principally federal, state and local governmental agencies.agencies and, increasingly, managed care organizations. The federal, state and local programs under which theythe agencies operate are subject to legislative, budgetary and other risks that can influence reimbursement rates. Our commercial insurance carrier payor clientsWe are typically for profit companies and are continuously seeking opportunitiesexperiencing a further transition of business from government payors to control costs. Wemanaged care organizations with which we are seeking to grow our private duty business.business given our emphasis on coordinated care and the prevention of the need for acute care. Managed care organizations are commercial insurance carriers that are under contract with various federal and state governmental agencies to provide and manage a full continuum of care.

For 2013, 2012the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2011,2014, our payor revenue mix for continuing operations was:

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2013  2012  2011 

State, local and other governmental programs

   94.1  94.9  93.5

Commercial

   2.0    1.0    1.3  

Private duty

   3.9    4.1    5.2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   100.0  100.0  100.0
   Year Ended December 31, 
   2016  2015  2014 

State, local and other governmental programs

   70.4  77.7  86.4

Managed care organizations

   26.1   18.3   9.1 

Private pay

   2.4   3.0   3.4 

Commercial insurance

   1.1   1.0   1.1 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   100.0  100.0  100.0

We derive a significant amount of our net service revenues from our continuing operations in Illinois, and California, which represented 66%53.6%, 59.5% and 6%; 64% and 7%; 58% and 8%;60.6% of our total net service revenues from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

A significant amount of our net service revenues from continuing operations are derived from one payor client, the Illinois Department on Aging, which accounted for 59%42.1%, 57%48.8% and 51%53.2% of our total net service revenues from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

The State of Illinois’ payments have been delayed in the past and may continue to be delayed due to a budget impasse that began in 2015. The State of Illinois did not adopt a comprehensive budget for fiscal year 2016, which ended on June 30, 2016, and it has not yet adopted a comprehensive budget for fiscal year 2017, which began on July 1, 2016. Stopgap budget legislation was enacted on June 30, 2016, which appropriated funds through December 31, 2016. Without a budget, the State is not authorized to pay for non-Medicaid consumers we served. Non-Medicaid consumers from Illinois represent approximately 15% of our current total annual revenues. Our accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2016 increased 37.7% compared to 2015, due in part to delays from the State of Illinois in the second half of 2016. Accounts receivable attributable to delayed payments from the Illinois Department on Aging totaled $53.0 million at the end of 2016, approximately $36.8 million thereof related to Non-Medicaid consumers and approximately $16.2 related to Medicaid consumers. Reimbursements from the State of Illinois could be further delayed due to the lack of a budget for fiscal year 2017 and because current forecasts indicate higher state deficits in the near future.

We also measure the performance of our business using a number of different metrics. We considermetrics, including billable hours, billable hours per business day, revenues per billable hour and the number of consumers, or census.

In 2016, the increase in managed care organization revenue was mainly attributable to the South Shore acquisition.

Components of our Statements of OperationsIncome

Net Service Revenues

We generate net service revenues from continuing operations by providing our services directly to individuals.consumers and primarily on an hourly basis. We receive payment for providing such services from our payor clients, including federal, state and local governmental agencies, managed care organizations, commercial insurers and private individuals.

Net service revenues from continuing operations are typically generated based on services rendered and reimbursed on an hourly basis. Our net service revenues from continuing operations were generated principally through reimbursements by state, local and other governmental programs which are partially funded by Medicaid programs, and to a lesser extent from private duty and insurance programs.consumers. Net service revenues from continuing operations are principally provided based on authorized hours, determined by the relevant agency, at an hourly rate which is either contractual or fixed by legislation and are recognized as net service revenues at the time services are rendered.

Cost of Service Revenues

We incur direct care wages, payroll taxes and benefit-related costs from continuing operations in connection with providing our services. We also provide workers’ compensation and general liability coverage for theseour employees.

Employees are also reimbursed for their travel time and related travel costs.

General and Administrative Expenses

Our general and administrative expenses from continuing operations consistinclude our costs for operating our network of expenses incurred in connection withlocal agencies and our activities and as part of our central administrative functions.offices.

Our general and administrativeagency expenses from continuing operations consist principally of costs for supervisory personnel, our community care coordinationsupervisors and office administrationadministrative costs. These expensesPersonnel costs include wages, payroll taxes, and benefit-related costs; facility rent; operatingemployee benefits. Facility costs such asincluding rents, utilities, postage, telephone and office expenses;expenses. Our support center and bad debt expense. We have initiated efforts to centralize administrative tasks currently conducted at the branch locations. Theexecutive office includes costs related to these initiatives are included in the general and administrative expenses from continuing operations. Other centralized expenses from continuing operations include administrative departments offor accounting, information systems, human resources, billing and collections, and contract administration, as well as national program coordination efforts forcontracting, marketing and private duty.executive leadership. These expenses primarily consist of compensation, including stock-based compensation, payroll taxes, and related benefits;employee benefits, legal, accounting and other professional fees;fees, travel, general insurance, rents and related facility costs;costs.

During 2016, the Company took steps to streamline and simplify its operations. The expenses recorded for the year ended December 31, 2016 included costs related to terminated employees and other operatingdirect costs such as software applicationassociated with implementing these initiatives. Other direct costs software implementationincluded contract termination costs, travel,accelerated depreciation and asset write-offs. The Company incurred total pretax expenses related to these streamlining initiatives of approximately $8.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, which is included in general insurance and bank account maintenance fees.administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company expects some additional restructuring and other costs to occur, however, the amount and timing cannot be determined at this time.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

We amortize our intangible assets with finite lives, consisting of customer and referral relationships, trade names, trademarks, state licenses and non-compete agreements, principally onusing accelerated methods based upon their estimated useful lives. Depreciable assets consist principally of furniture and equipment, network administration and telephone equipment, and operating system software. Depreciable and leasehold assets are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line method over their useful lives or, if less and if applicable, their lease terms.

Interest Income

Legislation enacted in Illinois law entitles designated service program providers to receive a prompt payment interest penalty based on qualifying services approved for payment that remain unpaid after a designated period of time. As the amount and timing of the receipt of these payments are not certain, the interest income from continuing operations is

recognized when received. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we received and reported$2.8 million in the statement of operations caption, interest income. While we may be owed additional prompt payment interest,interest. For the amountyears ended December 31, 2015 and timing of receipt of such payments remains uncertain and2014 we have determined that we will continue to recognize prompt payment interest income when received. The state amended its prompt payment interest terms, effective July 1, 2011, which changed the measurement period for outstanding invoices from a 60-day to a 90-day outstanding period. We believe this change in terms will reduce future amounts paid fordid not earn or receive any prompt payment interest.

Interest Expense

Interest expense from continuing operations consists of interest costs on our credit facility, capital lease obligations and other debt instruments.instruments and is reported in the statement of income when incurred.

Other Income

For the year ended December 31, 2016, other income from continuing operations of $0.2 million consists of income distributions received from the cost method investment in joint venture. No distributions were received during the years ended December 31, 2015 or 2014. We account for this income in accordance with ASC Topic 325, “Investments—Other.” We recognize the net accumulated earnings only to the extent distributed by the joint venture on the date received.

Income Tax Expense

All of our income from continuing operations is from domestic sources. We incur state and local taxes in states in which we operate. The differences from theFor 2016 and 2015, our federal statutory rate of 35% arerates were 35.0% and 34.5%, respectively. The effective income tax rates were 25.2% and 26.1% for 2016 and 2015, respectively. The difference between federal statutory and effective income tax rates was principally due to the inclusion of state taxes and the use of federal employment tax credits.credits that lower our effective tax rate.

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations consists of the resultsreduction of operations,the indemnification reserve, net of tax for our Home Health Business that was sold effective March 1, 2013 and the results of operations for an agency in Pennsylvania that was sold on December 30, 2013 and an agency in Idaho that was closed in November 2012.2013.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 20132016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20122015

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our consolidated results of operations.

 

  2013 2012 Change   2016 2015 Change 
  Amount % of
Net  Service
Revenues
 Amount % of
Net  Service
Revenues
 Amount %   Amount Net Service
Revenues
 Amount Net Service
Revenues
 Amount % 
  (in thousands, except percentages)   (Amounts In Thousands, Except Percentages) 

Net service revenues

  $265,941    100.0 $244,315    100.0 $21,626    8.9  $400,688   100.0 $336,815   100.0 $63,873   19.0

Cost of service revenues

   198,202    74.5    180,264    73.8    17,938    10.0     294,593   73.5   245,492   72.9   49,101   20.0 
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

Gross profit

   67,739    25.5    64,051    26.2    3,688    5.8     106,095   26.5   91,323   27.1   14,772   16.2 

General and administrative expenses

   50,118    18.8    46,362    19.0    3,756    8.1     84,213   21.0   70,452   20.9   13,761   19.5 

Gain on sale of agency

   —      —      (495  (0.2  495    *  

Revaluation of contingent consideration

   —     —     130   —     (130  (100.0

Depreciation and amortization

   2,160    0.8    2,521    1.0    (361  (14.3   6,647   1.7   4,717   1.4   1,930   40.9 
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total operating expenses

   52,278    19.7    48,388    19.8    3,890    8.0     90,860   22.7   75,299   22.4   15,561   20.7 

Operating income from continuing operations

   15,461    5.8    15,663    6.4    (202  (1.3   15,235   3.8   16,024   4.8   (789  (4.9
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

Interest income

   (188  (0.1  (155  (0.1  (33  21.3     (2,812  (0.7  (47  —     (2,765  5,883.0 

Interest expense

   674    0.3    1,723    0.7    (1,049  (60.9   2,332   0.6   786   0.2   1,546   196.7 

Total interest expense, net

   486    0.2    1,568    0.6    (1,082  (69.0
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

Total interest (income) expense, net

   (480  (0.1  739   0.2   (1,219  (165.0

Other income

   206   0.1   —     0.2   206  
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

   14,975    5.6    14,095    5.8    880    6.2     15,921   4.0   15,285   4.5   636   4.2 

Income tax expense

   3,812    1.4    4,807    2.0    (995  (20.7   3,994   1.0   3,932   1.2   62   1.6 
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

Net income from continuing operations

   11,163    4.2    9,288    3.8    1,875    20.2     11,927   3.0   11,353   3.4   574   5.1 
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

Discontinued operations:

              

Earnings (loss) from home health business, net of tax

   7,982    3.0    (1,653  (0.7  9,635    (582.9

Earnings from Home Health Business, net of tax

   97   —     270   0.1   (173  (64.1
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

Net income (loss)

  $19,145    7.2 $7,635    3.1 $11,510    150.8

Net income

  $12,024   3.0 $11,623   3.5 $401   3.5
  

 

   

 

   

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

  

Business Metrics

       

Average billable census

   26,802     25,104     1,698    6.8

Billable hours (in thousands)

   15,621     14,388     1,233    8.7  

Average Billable hours per census per month

   49     48     1    2.1  

Business Metrics (Actual Numbers, Except Billable Hours in Thousands)

       

Average billable census(1)

   33,944    32,756    1,188   3.6

Billable hours(2)

   23,088    19,556    3,532   18.1 

Average billable hours per census per month

   57    50    7   14.0 

Billable hours per business day

   59,850     55,126     4,724    8.6     88,460    75,214    13,246   17.6 

Revenues per billable hour

  $17.02    $16.98    $0.04    .02  $17.35   $17.22   $0.13   0.8

 

*(1)Percentage information not meaningfulAverage billable census is the number of unique clients receiving a billable service during a period.

(2)Billable hours is the total number of hours served to clients during a period.

Net service revenues from state, local and other governmental programs accounted for 94.1 %70.4% and 94.9 %77.7% of net service revenues for 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. Private dutyManaged care organizations accounted for 26.1% and to a lesser extent,18.3% of net service revenues in 2016 and 2015 respectively, with private and commercial payors accountedaccounting for the remainder of net service revenues. A significant amount of our net service revenues in 2016 and 2015 were derived from one payor client, Illinois Department on Aging, which accounted for 42.1% and 48.8% respectively, of our total net service revenues from continuing operations.

Net service revenues increased $21.6$63.9 million, or 8.9%19.0%, to $265.9$400.7 million for 20132016 compared to $244.3$336.8 million for the same period in 2012.2015. The increase was primarily due to the South Shore acquisition contributing net service revenues of $51.7 million in 2016 and a 6.8%3.6% increase in average billable census and a related 8.6%0.8% increase in revenues per billable hours.hour.

Gross profit, expressed as a percentage of net service revenues, decreased to 25.5%26.5% for 2013,2016, from 26.2%27.1% in 2012. This2015. The decrease as a percent of revenue of 0.7% iswas primarily due to increased wage costs for homecare aides.the South Shore acquisition which is a lower margin business.

General and administrative expenses, expressed as a percentage of net service revenues decreasedincreased to 18.8%21.0% for 2013,2016, from 19.0%20.9% in 2012.2015. General and administrative expenses increased to $ 50.1$84.2 million in 20132016 as compared to $46.4$70.5 million in 2012. In 2013, we had cost increases2015. The increase in general and administrative wages, an increase legal and

consulting expenses for acquisitionsthe years ended December 31, 2016 as compared to 2015 was primarily due to the following:

$4.8 million charge for lease commitments, a write-off of unamortized leasehold improvements, an equipment write-off resulting from the closure of three adult day services centers in Illinois during the third quarter of 2016, a write-off for unused contact center office space and business development initiatives, increased telecoma write-off related to the discontinued use of internally developed software and technology related costs, an increase in management bonuses and anfees for the termination of various contracts with certain outside vendors.

$3.2 million severance expense was taken for terminated employees with employment and/or separation agreements.

$3.1 million increase in bad debts.debt expense and a

$4.5 million increase in administrative employee wages, taxes and benefit costs, offset by a $1.2 million decrease in temporary office personnel expense.

Depreciation and amortization, expressed as a percentage of net service revenues, decreasedincreased to 0.81.7% from 1.4 % for 2013, from 1.0% in 2012.the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Amortization of intangibles, which are principally amortized using straight-line and accelerated methods, based upon the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, which range from two to twenty five years, totaled $1.3$4.9 million and $1.7$3.0 million for 2013the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively.

Interest Income

Legislation enacted in Illinois law entitles designated service program providers to receive a prompt payment interest penalty based on qualifying services approved for payment that remain unpaid after a designated period of time. As the amount and timing of the receipt of these payments are not certain, the interest income is recognized when received and reported in the income statement caption, interest“interest income. We” For the year ended December 31, 2016 we received $0.2$2.8 million in prompt payment interest in 2013 and $0.2 million in 2012. Whileinterest. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we may be owed additional prompt payment interest, the amount and timing of receipt of such payments remains uncertain and we have determined that we will continue to recognize prompt payment interest income when received. The state amended its prompt payment interest terms, effective July 1, 2011, which changed the measurement period for outstanding invoices from a 60-day to a 90-day outstanding period. We believe this change in terms will reduce future amounts paid fordid not earn or receive any prompt payment interest.

Interest Expense Net

Interest expense was $ 0.7increased to $2.3 million and $1.7from $0.8 million for 2013 and 2012, respectively. Interest expense decreased $ 1.0the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily the result of draws on the senior credit facility of $52.0 million primarily dueduring 2016. See Note 7 to a reductionthe Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Other Income

For the year ended December 31, 2016, other income from continuing operations of $0.2 million consists of income distributions received from the cost method investment in outstanding debt.joint venture. No distributions were received during the years ended December 31, 2015. We account for this income in accordance with ASC Topic 325, “Investments—Other.” We recognize the net accumulated earnings only to the extent distributed by the joint venture on the date received.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

Our effective tax ratesAll of our income is from continuing operations for 2013domestic sources. We incur state and 2012 were 25.5%local taxes in states in which we operate. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 34.1%2015 our federal statutory rate was 35.0% and 34.5%, respectively. The principaleffective income tax rate was 25.2% and 26.1% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The difference between our federal statutory and effective income tax rates are principally due to the Federalinclusion of state taxes and State statutory rates andthe use of federal employment tax credits that lower our effective tax rate is the use of Federal employment opportunity tax credits. Our effective tax rate for 2012 does not include any earned 2012 Federal employment opportunity tax credits, which were recognized in 2013 as the Federal employment opportunity tax credits were reinstated in January 2013.rate.

Discontinued Operations

Effective March 1, 2013, we sold substantially all of the assets used in our home health businessHome Health Business as described in Part I, Item 1. Therefore, we have segregated the Home Health Business operating results and presented them separately as discontinued operations for all periods presented (see noteNote 2— “Discontinued“Discontinued Operations” ofto the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein).

SeeThe table below that depictssummarizes the results of discontinued operations.

 

   2013  2012  Change 
   Amount  % of
Net  Service
Revenues
  Amount  % of
Net  Service
Revenues
  Amount  % 
   (in thousands, except percentages) 

Net service revenues

  $6,462    100.0 $38,822    100.0 $(32,360  (83.4)% 

Cost of service revenues

   3,692    57.1    20,818    53.6    (17,126  (82.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Gross profit

   2,770    42.9    18,004    46.4    (15,234  (84.6

General and administrative expenses

   4,442    68.7    20,743    53.4    (16,301  (78.6

Depreciation and amortization

   —      —      13    —      (13  (100.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Operating loss from discontinued operations

   (1,672  (25.9  (2,752  (7.1  1,080    (39.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Income tax (benefit)

   (692  (10.7  (1,099  (2.8  407    (37.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Net loss from discontinued operations

  $(980  (15.2)%  $(1,653  (4.3)%  $673    (40.7)% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

       2016           2015     
   (Amounts In Thousands) 

Net service revenues

  $—     $—   

Cost of service revenues

   —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

   —      —   

General and administrative expenses

   (163   (448

Depreciation and amortization

   —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income from discontinued operations

   163    448 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax

   66    178 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings from discontinued operations

  $97   $270 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The lossesNo revenues were recorded for 2013 are primarilythe year ended December 31, 2016 or 2015 related to the wind-downHome Health Business due to the sale of the business afterbusiness. For the sale on March 1, 2013. Operating lossesyear ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the earnings from discontinued operations represented our reduction of the Medicare indemnification reserve for the Home Health Business sold for periods no longer subject to audit. As of December 31, 2016, the Company, using its best judgment, has estimated a total of $0.4 million for billing adjustments for 2013, 2012 were primarily dueand 2011 which may be subject to reduced sales, higher costs to treat consumers and our inability to reduce fixed general and administrative costs at a rate consistent with revenue declines.Medicare audits.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 20122015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20112014

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our consolidated results of operations.

 

  2012 2011 Change   2015 2014 Change 
  Amount % of
Net Service
Revenues
 Amount % of
Net Service
Revenues
 Amount %   Amount Net  Service
Revenues
 Amount Net  Service
Revenues
 Amount % 
  (in thousands, except percentages)   (Amounts In Thousands, Except Percentages) 

Net service revenues

  $244,315    100.0% $230,105    100.0% $14,210    6.2%  $336,815   100.0% $312,942   100.0% $23,873   7.6

Cost of service revenues

   180,264    73.8    168,632    73.3    11,632    6.9     245,492   72.9   229,207   73.2   16,285   7.1 

Gross profit

   64,051    26.2    61,473    26.7    2,578    4.2     91,323   27.1   83,735   26.8   7,588   9.1 

General and administrative expenses

   46,362    19.0    45,858    19.9    504    1.1     70,452   21.0   61,834   19.8   8,618   13.9 

Revaluation of contingent consideration

   —     —     (469  (0.2  469    (100.0   130   0.0   —     0.0   130   0.0 

Gain on sale of agency

   (495)  (0.2  —     —     (495)  *  

Depreciation and amortization

   2,521    1.0    3,167    1.4    (646)  (20.4   4,717   1.4   3,830   1.2   887   23.2 

Total operating expenses

   48,388    19.8    48,556    21.1    (168)  (0.3   75,299   22.4   65,664   21.0   9,635   14.7 

Operating income from continuing operations

   15,663    6.4    12,917    5.6    2,746    21.3     16,024   4.8   18,071   5.8   (2,047)  (11.3

Interest income

   (155)  (0.1  (2,263  (1.0  2,108    (93.2)   (47)  —     (18)  —     (29)  161.1 

Interest expense

   1,723    0.7    2,524    1.1    (801)  (31.7   786   0.2   698   0.2   88   12.6 

Total interest expense, net

   1,568    0.6    261    0.1    1,307    500.8     739   0.2   680   0.2   59   8.7 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

   14,095    5.8    12,656    5.5    1,439    11.4     15,285   4.5   17,391   5.6   (2,106)  (12.1

Income tax expense

   4,807    2.0    4,244    1.8    563    13.3     3,932   1.2   5,428   1.7   (1,496)  (27.6

Net income from continuing operations

   9,288    3.8    8,412    3.7    876    10.4     11,353   3.4   11,963   3.8   (610)  (5.1

Discontinued operations:

              

Earnings (loss) from home health business, net of tax

   (1,653)  (0.7)  (10,393)  (4.5)  8,740    (84.1)

Net income (loss)

  $7,635    3.1% $(1,981)  (0.9)% $9,616    485.4%

Business Metrics

       

Average billable census

   25,104     23,877     1,277    5.3%

Billable hours (in thousands)

   14,388     13,504     884    6.5  

Average Billable hours per census per month

   48     47     1    2.1  

Earnings from Home Health Business, net of tax

   270   0.1   280   0.1   (10)  (3.6

Net income

  $11,623   3.5% $12,243   3.9% $(620)  (5.1)%

Business Metrics (Actual Numbers, Except Billable Hours in Thousands)

       

Average billable census (1)

   32,755    31,019    1,736   5.6

Billable hours (2)

   19,556    18,335    1,221   6.7 

Average billable hours per census per month

   50    49    1   2.0 

Billable hours per business day

   55,126     51,938     3,188    6.1     76,390    71,903    4,487   6.2 

Revenues per billable hour

  $16.98    $17.04    $(0.06)  (0.4)%  $17.22   $17.07   $0.15   0.9

(1)Average billable census is the number of unique clients receiving a billable service during a period.

(2)Billable hours is the total number of hours served to clients during a period.

Net service revenues from state, local and other governmental programs accounted for 94.9%77.7% and 93.5%86.4% of net service revenues for 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Private dutyManaged care organizations accounted for 18.3% and to a lesser extent,9.1% of net service revenues in 2015 and 2014 respectively, with private and commercial payors accountedaccounting for the remainder of net service revenues. A significant amount of our net service revenues in 2015 and 2014 were derived from one payor client, Illinois Department on Aging, which accounted for 48.8% and 53.2% respectively, of our total net service revenues from continuing operations.

Net service revenues increased $14.2$23.9 million, or 6.2%7.6%, to $244.3$336.8 million for 20122015 compared to $230.1$312.9 million for the same period in 2011.2014. The increase was primarily due to a 5.3%5.6% increase in average billable census increase and a related 6.5%0.9% increase in revenues per billable hours.hour.

Gross profit, expressed as a percentage of net service revenues, decreasedincreased to 26.2%27.1% for 2012,2015, from 26.7%26.8% in 2011. This decrease as a percent of revenue of 0.5% is2014. The increase was primarily due to an increase inimproved workers’ compensation costs as a result of an increase in average claim costs during 2012, partially offset by an increase in the average billed hours per census per month while leveraging the fixed wage cost for field staff.experience.

General and administrative expenses, expressed as a percentage of net service revenues decreasedincreased to 19.0%21.0% for 2012,2015, from 19.9%19.8% in 2011.2014. General and administrative expenses increased to $46.4$70.5 million in 20122015 as compared to $45.9$61.8 million in 2011. In 2012, we had cost increases2014. The increase in general and administrative wages, telecom and technology related costs,expenses as compared to 2014 was due to an increase in management bonuses, an increase in corporate infrastructurecosts related to wages, payroll taxes, stock compensation expenses, and increased expenditures related to legal, consulting, expensestemporary office personnel and the ongoing installation of our new human resources and payroll information system for business development initiatives which were partially offset by a decrease in bad debt expense due to improved collections and a decrease in legal related expenses.the year ended December 31, 2015.

Depreciation and amortization, expressed as a percentage of net service revenues, decreasedincreased to 1.0%1.4 % from 1.2 % for 2012, from 1.4% in 2011.the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization of intangibles, which are principally amortized using accelerated methods, totaled $1.7$3.0 million and $2.2$2.4 million for 2012the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

Interest Income

Legislation enacted in Illinois law entitles designated service program providers to receive a prompt payment interest penalty based on qualifying services approved for payment that remain unpaid after a designated period of time. As the amount and timing of the receipt of these payments are not certain, the interest income is recognized when received and reported in the income statement caption, interest“interest income. We received $0.2 million indid not receive or earn any prompt payment interest in 20122015 and $2.32014 and $0.2 million in 2011. While we may be owed additional prompt payment interest, the amount and timing of receipt of such payments remains uncertain and we have determined that we will continue to recognize prompt payment interest income when received. The state amended its prompt payment interest terms, effective July 1, 2011, which changed the measurement period for outstanding invoices from a 60-day to a 90-day outstanding period. We believe this change in terms will reduce future amounts paid for prompt payment interest.2013.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, was $1.7net, increased to $0.7 million and $2.5from $0.7 million for 2012the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to December 31, 2014. The increase was primarily as a result of the capital lease agreements entered into on July 12, 2014, September 11, 2014 and 2011, respectively. Interest expense decreased $0.8 million primarily dueApril 13, 2015 and interest on the new senior credit facility entered into on November 10, 2015, as described in Note 7 to a reduction in outstanding debt.the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

Our effective tax rates from continuing operations for 20122015 and 20112014 were 34.1%26.1% and 33.5%31.2%, respectively. The principal difference between the Federalfederal and Statestate statutory rates and our effective tax rate is the use of Federalfederal employment opportunity tax credits. Our effective tax rate for 2012 does not include any earned 2012 Federal employment opportunity tax credits, which were recognized in 2013 as the Federal employment opportunity tax credits were reinstated in January 2013.

Discontinued Operations

Effective FebruaryMarch 1, 2013, we entered intosold substantially all of the assets used in our Home Health Purchase Agreement.Business as described in Part I, Item 1. Therefore, we have segregated the Home Health Business operating results and presented them separately as discontinued operations for all periods presented (see noteNote 2— “Discontinued“Discontinued Operations” ofto the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein).

SeeThe table below that depictssummarizes the results of discontinued operations.

 

  2012 2011 Change 
  Amount % of  Net
Service
Revenues
 Amount % of  Net
Service
Revenues
 Amount %       2015           2014     
  (in thousands, except percentages)   (Amounts In Thousands) 

Net service revenues

  $38,822    100.0 $42,995    100.0 $(4,173)  (9.7)%  $—    $—  

Cost of service revenues

   20,818    53.6    22,673    52.7    (1,855)  (8.2   —     —  
  

 

   

 

 

Gross profit

   18,004    46.4    20,322    47.3    (2,318)  (11.4)   —     —  

General and administrative expenses

   20,743    53.4    21,068    49.0    (325)  (1.5   (448)   (470)

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge

   —     —      15,989    37.2    (15,989)  (100.0

Depreciation and amortization

   13    —      387    0.9    (374)  (96.6)   —     —  

Operating loss from discontinued operations

   (2,752)  (7.1  (17,122  (39.8  14,370    (83.9)

Income tax (benefit)

   (1,099)  (2.8  (6,729)  (15.7  5,630    83.7  

Net loss from discontinued operations

  $(1,653)  (4.3)% $(10,393)  (24.2)% $8,740    (84.1)%
  

 

   

 

 

Operating income from discontinued operations

   448    470 
  

 

   

 

 

Income tax

   178    190 
  

 

   

 

 

Earnings from discontinued operations

  $270   $280 
  

 

   

 

 

The losses

No revenues were primarilyrecorded for the year ended December 31, 2015 or 2014 related to the Home Health Business due to reduced sales, higher coststhe sale of the business. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the earnings from discontinued operations represents our reduction of the Medicare indemnification reserve for the Home Health Business sold for periods no longer subject to treat consumers andaudit. We retained the working capital of our inability to reduce fixed general and administrative costs at a rate consistent with revenue declines.Home Health Business when it was sold. The earnings from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 represents the final settlement of previously estimated working capital amounts.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our discussion below regarding our liquidity and capital resources includes discontinued operations.

Overview

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash from operations and borrowings under our credit facility. We entered into an amendment to our credit facility on the terms described below on May 24, 2016. At December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, we had cash balances of $15.6$8.0 million and $1.7$4.1 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 20132016, we had a total of $24.1 million outstanding on our credit facility. As of December 31, 2015, we had no balances outstanding under the revolving credit portion ofon our credit facility. After giving effect to the amount drawn on our credit facility, approximately $ 12.4$16.7 million of outstanding letters of credit as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and borrowing limits based on an advancedadvance multiple of adjustedAdjusted EBITDA, we had $ 42.6$79.7 million and $58.3 million available for borrowing under the credit facility as of December 31, 2013.2016 and 2015, respectively.

We used $16.3 million of the proceeds from the sale of the Home Health Business to pay down the outstanding amount of the revolving credit facility during the first quarter of 2013. In addition, in consideration for our lender’s consent to the sale of the Home Health Business, we agreed to work in good faith to negotiate an amendment to our credit facility to amend certain provisions of the credit agreement. Cash flows from operating activities represent the inflow of cash from our payor clients and the outflow of cash for payroll and payroll taxes, operating expenses, interest and taxes. Due to its revenue deficiencies and financing issues, from time to time the State of Illinois has reimbursed us on a delayed basis with respect to our various agreements including with our largest payor, the Illinois Department on Aging. The open receivable balance from the State of Illinois decreasedincreased by $7.8$18.9 million from $52.9$50.4 million as of December 31, 20122015 to $45.1$69.3 million as of December 31, 2013.2016.

The State of Illinois continues to reimburse us on aIllinois’ payments have been delayed basis. These payment delays have adversely impacted,in the past and may continue to be delayed due to a budget impasse that began in 2015. The State of Illinois did not adopt a comprehensive budget for fiscal year 2016, which ended on June 30, 2016, and it has not yet adopted a comprehensive budget for fiscal year 2017, which began on July 1, 2016. Stopgap budget legislation was enacted on June 30, 2016, which appropriated funds through December 31, 2016. Without a budget, the State is not authorized to pay for non-Medicaid consumers we served. Non-Medicaid consumers from Illinois represent approximately 15% of our current total annual revenues. Our accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2016 increased 37.7% compared to 2015, due in part to delays from the State of Illinois in the second half of 2016. Accounts receivable attributable to delayed payments from the Illinois Department on Aging totaled $53.0 million at the end of 2016, approximately $36.8 million thereof related to Non-Medicaid consumers and approximately $16.2 related to Medicaid consumers. Reimbursements from the State of Illinois could be further delayed due to the lack of a budget for fiscal year 2017 and because current forecasts indicate higher state deficits in the near future.

There remains uncertainty surrounding the remainder of the 2017 fiscal year and future budgets. If payments from the State of Illinois continue to be delayed in the future or become further delayed, or the Illinois State budget impasse is not resolved in the near term, the delays could adversely impact our liquidity and may result in the need to increase borrowings under our credit facility. Delayed reimbursements from ourfacility or cause us to pursue other state payors have also contributed to the increase in our receivable balances.liquidity options.

Credit Facility

On May 24, 2016, we entered into an amendment to our credit facility with certain lenders and Fifth Third Bank, as agent and letters of credit issuer. Our amended credit facility provides a $55.0$100.0 million revolving line of credit, a delayed draw term loan facility of up to $25.0 million and an uncommitted incremental term loan facility of up to $50.0 million, expiring November 2, 2014,10, 2020 and includes a $15.0$35.0 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit. The amended credit facility increased the specified advance multiple from 3.25 to 3.75 to 1.00

and previously included a $5.0 million term loan that matured and was paid on January 5, 2013.the maximum permitted senior leverage ratio from 3.50 to 4.00 to 1.00. Except as modified by the May 24, 2016, amendment, the amended credit facility contains the same material terms as the previous agreement dated November 10, 2015. Substantially all of the subsidiaries of Holdings are co-borrowers, and Holdings has guaranteed the borrowers’ obligations under the credit facility. The credit facility is secured by a first priority security interest in all of Holdings’ and the borrowers’ current and future tangible and intangible assets, including the shares of stock of the borrowers.

The availability of funds under the revolving credit portion of theour credit facility as amended, is based on the lesser of (i) the product of adjustedAdjusted EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement, for the most recent 12-month period for which financial statements have been delivered under the credit facility agreement multiplied by the specified advance multiple, up to 3.25,3.75, less the outstanding senior indebtedness and letters of credit, and (ii) $55.0$100.0 million less the outstanding revolving loans and letters of credit. Interest on the revolving line of credit and term loan amounts outstanding under theour credit facility ismay be payable either at (x) the sum of (i) an applicable margin ranging from 2.00% to 2.50% based on the applicable leverage ratio plus (ii) a floatingbase rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR, plus an applicable margingreatest of 4.6% or(a) the LIBOR rate for term periods of one, two, three or six monthsinterest last quoted by The Wall Street Journal as the “prime rate,” (b) the sum of the federal funds rate plus a margin of 4.6%. Interest0.50% and (c) the sum of the adjusted LIBOR that would be applicable to a loan with an interest period of one month advanced on the credit facility is paid monthlyapplicable day plus a margin of 3.00% or (y) the sum of (i) an applicable margin ranging from 3.00% to 3.50% based on or at the end ofapplicable leverage ratio plus (ii) the relevantadjusted LIBOR that would be applicable to a loan with an interest period as determined in accordanceof one, two or three months advanced on the applicable day or (z) the sum of (i) an applicable margin ranging from 3.00% to 3.50% based on the applicable leverage ratio plus (ii) the daily floating LIBOR that would be applicable to a loan with an interest period of one month advanced on the credit facility agreement.applicable day. We pay a fee equalranging from 0.25% to 0.5%0.50% per annum ofbased on the applicable leverage ratio times the unused portion of the revolving portion of the credit facility. Issued stand-by letters of credit are charged at a rate equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR loans payable quarterly. On January 12, 2016, May 5, 2016 and July 14, 2016, we drew $10.0 million, $10.0 million and $10.0 million, respectively, of 2.0% per annum payable monthly.our revolving credit line to fund growth and on-going operations. On February 5, 2016, we drew $22.0 million on our delayed draw term loan to fund the acquisition of South Shore. As a result of a provision in our amended credit facility, we were able to transfer $3.0 million of our revolving credit line debt to our term loan debt on May 24, 2016. During the month of August 2016, we fully repaid all outstanding amounts under the revolving portion of our credit facility. As of December 31, 2016, we had a total of $24.1 million outstanding on our credit facility and the total availability under our credit facility was $79.7 million. We did not have any amounts outstanding on our credit facility as of December 31, 20132015 and the total availability under the revolvingour credit loan facility was $42.6$58.3 million.

The credit facility contains customary affirmative covenants regarding, among other things, the maintenance of records, compliance with laws, maintenance of permits, maintenance of insurance and property and payment of taxes. The credit facility also contains certain customary financial covenants and negative covenants that, among other things, include a requirement to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a requirement to stay below a maximum senior leverage ratio and a requirement to stay below a maximum permitted amount of capital expenditures, as well as restrictions on guarantees, indebtedness, liens, dividends, distributions, investments and loans, subject to customary carve outs, a restriction on dividends (unless no default then exists or would occur as a result thereof, we are in pro forma compliance with the financial covenants contained in the credit facility after giving effect thereto, we have an excess availability of at least 40% of the revolving credit commitment under the credit facility and the aggregate amount of dividends and distributions paid in any fiscal year does not exceed $5.0 million), restrictions on our ability to enter into transactions other than in the ordinary course of business, a restriction on the ability to consummate more than three acquisitions in any calendar year, or for theconsummate any individual acquisition with a purchase price in excess of any one acquisition to exceed $0.5$25.0 million and consummate acquisitions with total purchase price in excess of $40.0 million in the aggregate over the term of the credit facility, in each case without the consent of the lenders, restrictions on mergers, transfers of assets, acquisitions, equipment, subsidiaries and affiliate transactions, subject to customary carve outs, and restrictions on fundamental changes and lines of business. WeAs of December 31, 2016 and 2015, we were in compliance with all of our credit facility covenants at December 31, 2013.covenants.

During the second quarter of 2012, the lenders under our credit facility agreed to a modified interpretation of the credit facility as it relates to the calculation of the fixed charge ratio, which provides us with increased flexibility in meeting this covenant. In order to obtain consent from our lender for the sale of the Home Health Business we agreed to work in good faith to negotiate and enter into an amendment to the credit facility to amend certain provisions including a reduction in the maximum revolving loan limit and revolving loan commitment.

We have received a commitment letter to renew our credit facility for a period of five years on essentially the same terms as the expiring facility. If executed, the term of the new facility will expire in November 2, 2019.

While our growth plan is not dependent on the completion of acquisitions, if we do not have sufficient cash resources or availability under our credit facility, or we are otherwise prohibited from making acquisitions under the terms of our credit facility, our growth, including our ability to grow through acquisitions, could be limited unless we obtain additional equity or debt financing or unless we obtain the necessary consents from our lenders.lenders under our credit facility. We believe the available borrowings under our credit facility, which, when taken togethercombined with cash from operations, will be sufficient to cover our working capital needs for at least the next 12 months.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes historical changes in our cash flows for:for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014:

 

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2013  2012  2011 
   (in thousands) 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $27,393   $15,405   $15,947  

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   2,893    (619  (1,051

Net cash (used in) financing activities

   (16,458  (15,069  (13,692
   2016   2015   2014 
   (Amounts in Thousands) 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

  $(743  $4,106   $7,028 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (21,738   (10,724   (12,496

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   26,390    (2,641   3,266 

Year Ended December 31, 20132016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20122015

Net cash used in operating activities was $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $4.1 million for the same period in 2015. This increase in cash used in operations was primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable during this period resulting from the delay in payments from the State of Illinois.

Net cash used in investing activities was $21.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to cash used in investing activities of $10.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $20.0 million for the acquisition of South Shore as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and $1.7 million in purchases of property and equipment related to new office space and investments in our technology infrastructure. Our investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $2.2 million in purchases of property and equipment to invest in our technology infrastructure, $4.3 million and $4.1 million for the acquisition of Priority Home Healthcare, Inc. and Five Points Healthcare of Virginia, as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and $0.1 million for the acquisition of a customer list.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $26.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $52.0 million in draws on our credit facility to fund on-going operations and the acquisition of South Shore, a full repayment of the revolving portion of our credit facility in the amount of $27.0 million and $0.9 million payments on the term loan portion of our credit facility. Our financing activities also included $1.2 million of payments on capital lease obligations, $3.0 million of cash received for the exercise of employee stock options, $1.1 million of excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options, $0.5 million payment for debt issuance costs and a $0.1 million payment for the contingentearn-out obligation related to our December 1, 2013 acquisition of Coordinated Home Health Care, LLC. Our financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 were a $1.0 million payment on the CHHC contingent earn-out obligation as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, $1.1 million of payments on capital lease obligations and $1.2 million payment for debt issuance costs, $0.3 million of cash received for the exercise of employee stock options and $0.3 million of excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options.

Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014

Net cash provided by operating activities was $27.4$4.1 million for 2013,the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to $15.4 million in 2012. This increase in cash provided by operations was primarily due to an increase in cash generated from continuing operations totaling $2.3 million, less cash used in discontinued operations totaling $1.8 million, plus amounts provided by net changes in working capital of $11.5 million.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $2.9$7.0 million for 2013. Our investing activities for 2013 were $16.1 millionthe same period in net proceeds received from the sale of the Home Health Business less $12.3 million related to acquisitions made during the year and the purchase of $0.9 million of property and equipment. Our investing activities for 2012 were $1.1 million for capital expenditures less a $0.5 million payment received for the sale of an agency.

Net cash used in financing activities was $16.5 million for 2013 as compared to net cash used of $15.1 million in 2012. Our financing activities for 2013 were primarily driven by net payments of $16.3 million on the revolving credit portion of our credit facility and $0.2 million in payments on our term loan. Our financing activities in 2012 were primarily driven by $8.5 million in payments on the revolving credit portion of our credit facility, $4.1 million in payments on subordinated dividend notes and $2.5 million in payments on our term loan.

Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2011

Net cash provided by operating activities was $15.4 million for 2012, compared to $15.9 million in 2011.2014. This decrease in cash provided by operations was primarily due to an increase in working capitalaccrued expenses and accounts of $2.8 million, which was offset by a decrease in our operating income of $3.3 million, of which $2.1 million represents a decline in prompt payment interest received with the remainder predominantly driven from declines in our home health business offset by increases in our home and community based services.receivable during this period.

Net cash used in investing activities was $0.6$10.7 million for 2012.the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to cash used in investing activities of $12.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. Our investing activities for 2012the year ended December 31, 2015 were $0.5$2.2 million in net proceeds received for the sale of a home health agency and the purchase of $1.1 millionpurchases of property and equipment.equipment to invest in our technology infrastructure, $4.3 million and $4.1 million for the acquisition of Priority Home Healthcare, Inc. and Five Points Healthcare of Virginia, as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and $0.1million for the acquisition of a customer list. Our investing activities for 2011 were $0.6 million for capital expendituresthe year ended December 31, 2014 included purchases of property and equipment related to our support center in Downers Grove, IL, the purchase of a $0.5 million earn-out paymentnew payroll system and the acquisition of Aid & Assist as described in Note 3 to Advantage.the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net cash used in financing activities was $15.1$2.6 million for 2012the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to net cash usedprovided by financing activities of $13.7$3.3 million in 2011.for the year ended December 31, 2014. Our financing activities for 2012the year ended December 31, 2015 were primarily driven by net payments of $8.5a $1.0 million payment on the revolving credit portionCHHC contingent earn-out obligation as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, $1.1 million of our credit facility, $4.1 million in payments on our subordinated dividend notescapital lease obligations and $2.5$1.2 million in payments on our term loan.payment for debt issuance costs, $0.3 million of cash received for the exercise of employee stock options and $0.3 million of excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options. Our financing activities in 2011for the year ended December 31, 2014 were primarily driven by $8.5 millionrelated to capital lease obligations entered into during the year to finance purchases of property and equipment related to our support center in payments on the revolving credit portion of our credit facility, $2.5 million in payments on subordinated dividend notes, $2.3 million in payments on our term loan, and $0.4 million in payments on other notes.Downers Grove, IL.

Outstanding Accounts Receivable

Gross accounts receivable as of December 31, 20132016 and 2015 were approximately $65.5 million.$124.4 million and $89.8 million, respectively. Outstanding accounts receivable, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts, decreasedincreased by $10.3$32.0 million as of December 31, 20132016 as compared to December 31, 2012, with $7.4 million representing the collection of Home Health accounts receivable.

Gross2015. The increase in accounts receivable asis primarily attributable to delay in both Medicaid and non-Medicaid payment from the State of December 31, 2012 were approximately $75.8 million. OutstandingIllinois for fiscal year 2017, accounts receivable netacquired as part of our acquisitions and the allowance for doubtful accounts, decreased by $1.1 million as of December 31, 2012 as compared to December 31, 2011.general increase in our overall business.

We establish our allowance for doubtful accounts to the extent it is probable that a portion or all of a particular account will not be collected. OurWe establish our provision for doubtful accounts is estimated and recorded primarily by analyzing historical trends and the aging receivables utilizing eight aging categories and applying our historical collection rates to each aging category, taking into consideration factors that might impact the use of historical collection rates or payor groups, with certain large payors analyzed separately from other payor groups.receivables. In our evaluation, of these estimates, we also consider other factors including: delays in payment trends in individual states due to budget or funding issues,issues; billing conversions related to acquisitions or internal systems andsystems; resubmission of bills with required documentation and disputes with specific payors. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained at a level that our management believes is sufficient to cover potential losses. However, actual collections could differ from our estimates.

Our collection procedures include review of account agingsaging and direct contact with our payors. We have historically not used collection agencies. An uncollectible amount not governed by amount or aging, is written off to the allowance account only after reasonable collection efforts have been exhausted.

The following tables detail our accounts receivable before reserves by payor category, showing Illinois governmental payors separately, and the related allowance amount at December 31, 2013, December 31, 20122016, 2015 and December 31, 2011:2014:

 

   December 31, 2013 
   0-90 Days  91-180 Days  181-365 Days  Over
365 Days
  Total 
   (in thousands, except percentages) 

Continuing Operations

      

Illinois governmental based programs

  $40,584   $2,912   $430   $483   $44,409  

Other state, local and other governmental programs

   14,551    1,659    914    116    17,240  

Private duty and commercial

   2,586    380    142    112    3,220  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   57,721    4,951    1,486    711    64,869  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Aging % continuing operations

   89.0  7.6  2.3  1.1 

Discontinued Operations

      

Medicare

   —      —      744    —      744  

Other state, local and other governmental programs

   —      —      —      —      —    

Private duty and commercial

   —      —      (119  —      (119

Illinois governmental based programs

   —      —      —      —      —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   —      —      625    —      625  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $57,721   $4,951   $2,111   $711   $65,494  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Aging % of total

   88.1%  7.6%  3.2%  1.1% 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

      $4,140  

Reserve as % of gross accounts receivable

       6.3%

  December 31, 2012  December 31, 2016 
  0-90 Days 91-180 Days 181-365 Days Over
365 Days
 Total  0-90 Days 91-180 Days 181-365 Days Over
365 Days
 Total 
  (in thousands, except percentages)  (Amounts In Thousands, Except Percentages) 

Continuing Operations

      

Illinois governmental based programs

  $38,339   $13,374   $1,076   $126   $52,915   $40,727  $25,619  $1,418  $1,585  $69,349 

Other state, local and other governmental programs

   10,248    845    610    329    12,032    20,786   3,090   2,117   3,002   28,995 

Private duty and commercial

   1,936    360    127    401    2,824  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   50,523    14,579    1,813    856    67,771  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Aging % continuing operations

   74.5  21.5  2.7  1.3 

Medicare

   4,751    955    188    —      5,894  

Other state, local and other governmental programs

   340    109    58    —      507  

Private duty and commercial

   965    211    164    30    1,370  

Illinois governmental based programs

   128    19    35    45    227  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   6,184    1,294    445    75    7,998  

Managed care organizations

  14,039   3,341   2,848   2,679   22,907 

Private pay and commercial insurance

  2,439   399   265   8   3,111 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $56,707   $15,873   $2,258   $931   $75,769   $77,991  $32,449  $6,648  $7,274  $124,362 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Aging % of total

   74.9%  20.9%  3%  1.2%   62.8%  26.1%  5.3%  5.8% 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

      $4,466       $7,363 

Reserve as % of gross accounts receivable

       5.9%      5.9
 December 31, 2015 
 0-90 Days 91-180 Days 181-365 Days Over
365  Days
 Total 
 (Amounts In Thousands, Except Percentages) 

Illinois governmental based programs

 $31,755  $16,315  $1,066  $1,276  $50,412 

Other state, local and other governmental programs

  13,218   4,473   3,507   1,308   22,506 

Managed care organizations

  8,867   1,711   1,969   598   13,145 

Private pay and commercial insurance

  3,118   454   225   (51)  3,746 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 $56,958  $22,953  $6,767  $3,131  $89,809 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Aging % of total

  63.4%  25.6%  7.5%  3.5% 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

     $4,850 

Reserve as % of gross accounts receivable

      5.4%

 

  December 31, 2011   December 31, 2014 
  0-90 Days 91-180 Days 181-365 Days Over
365  Days
 Total   0-90 Days 91-180 Days 181-365 Days Over
365 Days
 Total 
  (in thousands, except percentages)   (Amounts In Thousands, Except Percentages) 

Continuing Operations

      

Illinois governmental based programs

  $33,233   $11,969   $416   $1,110   $46,728    $37,406  $5,298  $670  $762  $44,136 

Other state, local and other governmental programs

   11,205    1,235    1,038    1,807    15,285     12,951   1,815   1,284   60   16,110 

Private duty and commercial

   1,690    502    583    916    3,691  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   46,128    13,706    2,037    3,833    65,704  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Aging % continuing operations

   70.2  20.9  3.1  5.8 

Medicare

   6,109    2,991    991    17    10,108  

Other state, local and other governmental programs

   518    153    122    161    954  

Private duty and commercial

   1,225    393    355    149    2,122  

Illinois governmental based programs

   241    249    119    60    669  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   8,093    3,786    1,587    387    13,853  

Managed care organizations

   6,524   1,167   919   258   8,868 

Private pay and commercial insurance

   2,658   299   173   (30)  3,100 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $54,221   $17,492   $3,624   $4,220   $79,557    $59,539  $8,579  $3,046  $1,050  $72,214 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Aging % of total

   68.2%  22.0%  4.6%  5.2%    82.4%  11.9%  4.2%  1.5% 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

      $7,189        $3,881 

Reserve as % of gross accounts receivable

       9.0%       5.4%

We calculate our continuing operations days sales outstanding (“DSO”) by taking the accounts receivable outstanding net of the allowance for doubtful accounts divided by the total net service revenues for the last quarter, multiplied by the number of days in that quarter. Our DSOs from continuing operations were 85, 86104, 92 and 9480 days at December 31, 2013, December 31, 20122016, 2015 and December 31, 2011,2014, respectively. The DSOs for our largest payor, the Illinois Department on Aging, at December 31, 2013, December 31, 20122016, 2015 and December 31, 20112014 were 97, 122152, 101 and 12585 days, respectively. We domay not expect to continue to receive payments on a consistent basis in the near term and anticipate our DSOs and the DSO for our largest payorthe Illinois Department on Aging may increase despite Illinois’s enactment of a stopgap budget on June 30, 2016. The increase in the reserve as a percentage of gross accounts receivable to increase.5.9% as of December 31, 2016 from 5.4% as of December 31, 2015 is attributable to additional reserves needed for managed care organizations and

Dividend Notes

Prior toacquisition transitions. The reserve as percentage of gross accounts receivable remains the completion of our IPO, we had 37,750 shares of series A preferred stock issuedsame for 2015 and outstanding, all of which were converted into shares of our common stock on November 2, 2009. Shares of our series A preferred stock accumulated dividends each quarter2014 at a rate of 10%, compounded annually. We accrued these undeclared dividends because the holders had the option to convert their shares of series A preferred stock into common stock at any time with the accumulated dividends payable in cash or a note payable. Our series A preferred stock was converted into 4,077,000 shares of common stock in connection with the completion of our IPO on November 2, 2009. We paid $0.2 million of the $13.1 million outstanding accumulated dividends as of November 2, 2009 with the remaining $12.9 million being converted into 10% junior subordinated promissory notes, which we refer to as the dividend notes. The dividends notes were subordinated and junior to all obligations under our credit facility. Our dividend notes were repaid in full during the fourth quarter of 2012.5.4%.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2013,2016, we did not have any off-balance sheet guarantees or arrangements with unconsolidated entities.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of the financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expense and related disclosures. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and other sources and factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances; however, actual results may differ from these estimates. We consider the items discussed below to be critical because of their impact on operations and their application requires our judgment and estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The majority of our revenues for 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 from continuing operations are derived from Medicaid and Medicaid waiver programs under agreements with various state and local authorities. These agreements provide for a service term from one year to an indefinite term. Services are provided based on authorized hours, determined by the relevant state or local agency, at an hourly rate specified in the agreement or fixed by legislation.legislation and recognized in net service revenues as services are provided. Services to other payors, such as private or commercial clients, are provided at negotiated hourly rates and recognized in net service revenues as services are provided. We provide for appropriate allowances for uncollectible amounts at the time the services are rendered.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We are paid for our services primarily by state and local agencies under Medicaid or Medicaid waiver programs, Medicare,managed care organizations, commercial insurance companies and private individuals.consumers. While our accounts receivable are uncollateralized, our credit risk is somewhat limited due to the significance of governmental payors to our results of operations. Laws and regulations governing the governmental programs in which we participate are complex and subject to interpretation. Amounts collected may be different than amounts billed due to client eligibility issues, insufficient or incomplete documentation, services at levels other than authorized and other reasons unrelated to credit risk.

Legislation enacted in Illinois law entitles designated service program providers to receive a prompt payment interest penalty based on qualifying services approved for payment that remain unpaid after a designated period of time. As the amount and timing of the receipt of these payments are not certain, the interest income is recognized when received and reported in the income statement caption, interest income. WeFor the year ended December 31, 2016, we received approximately $0.2 million, $0.2 million and $2.3$2.8 million in prompt payment interest in 2013, 2012interest. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2011, respectively. While2014 we may be owed additionaldid not earn or receive any prompt payment interest, the amount and timing of receipt of such payments remains uncertain and we have determined that we will continue to recognize prompt payment interest income when received.interest.

We establish our allowance for doubtful accounts to the extent it is probable that a portion or all of a particular account will not be collected. Our allowanceWe establish our provision for doubtful accounts is estimated and recorded primarily by analyzing historical trends and the aging receivables utilizing eight aging categories and applying our historical collection rates to each aging category, taking into consideration factors that might impact the use of historical collection rates or payor groups, with certain large payors analyzed separately from other payor groups.receivables. In our evaluation, of these estimates, we also consider other factors including: delays in payment trends in individual states due to budget or funding issues,issues; billing conversions related to acquisitions or internal systems,systems; resubmission of bills with required documentation and disputes with specific payors. Historically, we have not experienced any write-off of accounts as a result of a state operating with budget deficits. While we regularly monitor state budget and funding developments for the states in which we operate, we consider losses due to state credit risk on outstanding balances as remote. We believe that our recordedAn allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained at a level that our management believes is sufficient to cover potential losses; however,losses. However, actual collections in subsequent periods may require changes tocould differ from our estimates.

Goodwill

Our carrying value of goodwill is the residual of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired from various acquisitions including the acquisition of Addus HealthCare, Inc,Inc. (“Addus HealthCare”). In accordance with ASC Topic 350, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets ,”,” goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized. Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are required to be tested for impairment at least annually. We test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis, as of October 1, or whenever potential impairment triggers occur, such as a significant change in business climate or regulatory changes that would indicate that an impairment may have occurred. We may use a qualitative test, known as “Step 0”0,” or a two-step quantitative method to determine whether impairment has occurred. We can elect to perform Step 0, an optional qualitative analysis, and based on the results skip the remaining two steps. In 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, we elected to implement Step 0. The results of our Step 0 assessment indicated that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and therefore we concluded that there were no impairments for the years ended December 31, 20132016, 2015 or 2012.2014.

In 2011, we elected to evaluate the goodwill via the two step methodology. The first step in the evaluation of goodwill impairment involves comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit to the recorded value, including goodwill. We used the combination of a discounted cash flow model (“DCF model”) and the market multiple analysis method to determine the current fair value of each reporting unit. The DCF model was prepared using revenue and expense projections based on our current operating plan. As such, a number of significant assumptions and estimates are involved in the application of the DCF model to forecast revenue growth, price changes, gross profits, operating expenses and operating cash flows. The cash flows were discounted using a weighted average cost of capital of 14.5%, which was management’s best estimate based on our capital structure and external industry data. As part of the second step of this evaluation, if the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss would be recognized.

In light of the then Federal and state economic and reimbursement environments and state budgetary pressures to decrease or eliminate services provided by us, we completed a preliminary assessment of the fair value of our two reporting units, home & community (continuing operations) and home health (discontinued operations), and the potential for goodwill impairment as of June 30, 2011. Our total stockholders’ equity as of

September 30, 2011 was significantly greater than our market capitalization, which was approximately $43.6 million based on 10,774,886 shares of common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2011. While the market capitalization of approximately $43.6 million was below our stockholders’ equity, the market capitalization metric is only one indicator of fair value. In our opinion, the market capitalization approach, by itself, is not a reliable indicator of the value for our company.

Based on the above factors and updates to our business projections and forecasts, and other factors, we determined that the estimated fair value of our discontinued operations was less than the net book value indicating that its allocated goodwill was impaired. The preliminary assessment for our continuing operations indicated that its fair value was greater than its net book value with no initial indication of goodwill impairment.

As permitted by ASC Topic 350, when an impairment indicator arises toward the end of an interim reporting period, we may recognize our best estimate of that impairment loss. Based on our preliminary analysis prepared as of June 30, 2011, we determined that all of the $13.1 million allocated to goodwill for the discontinued operations as of September 30, 2011 was impaired and we recorded a goodwill impairment loss in the third quarter of 2011. The goodwill impairment charge was noncash in nature and did not affect our liquidity or cash flows from operating activities. Additionally, the goodwill impairment had no effect on our borrowing availability or covenants under our credit facility agreement.

The preliminary analysis prepared as of June 30, 2011 was subject to the completion of our annual impairment test as of October 1, 2011. We completed our annual impairment test of goodwill as of October 1, 2011 and determined that no additional impairment charges or adjustments were required. The goodwill for our continuing operations was $50.7 million. Continuing operations had fair values in excess of carrying amounts of approximately $9.1 million, or 8.9% as of October 1, 2011.

Long-Lived Assets

We review our long-lived assets and finite lived intangibles for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. To determine if impairment exists, we compare the estimated future undiscounted cash flows from the related long-lived assets to the net carrying amount of such assets. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset, generally determined by discounting the estimated future cash flows. No impairment charge was recorded in 2013for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 or 2012. Based on our 2011 assessment of fair value discussed above, we determined that all of the $2.3 million allocated to the discontinued operations finite lived intangibles were impaired.2014.

Indefinite-lived Assets

We also have indefinite-lived assets that are not subject to amortization expense such as licenses and in certain states certificates of need and licenses to conduct specific operations within geographic markets. Our management has concluded that certificates of need and licensesthese assets have indefinite lives, as management has determined that there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, economic or other factors that would limit the useful life of these intangible assets and we intend to renew the licenses indefinitely. The licenses and operate the certificates of need and licenses indefinitely. The certificates of need and licenses are tested annually for impairment. No impairment was recorded in 2013for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 or 2012. Based on our 2011 assessment of fair value discussed above, we determined that all of the $0.6 million allocated to discontinued operations certificates of need and licenses were impaired and recorded an impairment loss for 2011.2014.

Workers’ Compensation Program

Our workers’ compensation insurance program has a $0.35$0.4 million deductible component. We recognize our obligations associated with this program in the period the claim is incurred. The cost of both the claims reported and claims incurred but not reported, up to the deductible, have been accrued based on historical claims experience, industry statistics and an actuarial analysis performed by an independent third party. We monitor our

claims quarterly and adjust our reserves accordingly. These costs are recorded primarily in the cost of services caption in the consolidated statement of operations.income. Under the agreement pursuant to which we acquired Addus HealthCare, claims under our workers’ compensation insurance program that relaterelated to December 31, 2005 or earlier arewere the responsibility of the selling shareholders in the acquisition, subject to certain limitations. The responsibility of the selling shareholders for these claims was terminated on December 29, 2014. In August 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No 2010-24, Health Care Entities (Topic 954), “Presentation of Insurance Claims and Related Insurance Recoveries” (“ASU 2010-24”), which clarifies that companies should not net insurance recoveries against a related claim liability. Additionally, the amount of the claim liability should be determined without consideration of insurance recoveries. As of December 31, 2013, December 31, 20122016, 2015 and December 31, 20112014 we recorded $0.8 million. $1.0$0.7 million, $1.3 million, and $1.8$1.5 million, respectively, in workers’ compensation insurance recovery receivables and a corresponding increase in itsour workers’ compensation liability. The workers’ compensation insurance recovery receivable is included in our prepaid expenses and other current assets on the balance sheet.

Interest Income

Legislation enacted in Illinois law entitles designated service program providers to receive a prompt payment interest penalty based on qualifying services approved for payment that remain unpaid after a designated period of time. As the amount and timing of the receipt of these payments are not certain, the interest income from continuing operations is recognized when received. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we received and reported in the statement of operations caption, interest income. We received approximately $0.2 million, $0.2 million and $0.2$2.8 million in prompt payment interest in 2013, 2012interest. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2011, respectively. While2014 we may be owed additionaldid not earn or receive any prompt payment interest,interest.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes under the provisions of ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” The objective of accounting for income taxes is to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and timingdeferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of receiptevents that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. Deferred taxes, resulting from differences between the financial and tax basis of suchour assets and liabilities, are also adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. ASC Topic 740 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. ASC Topic 740, also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, ASC Topic 740 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, accounting in interim periods and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax positions.

Stock-based Compensation

We have two stock incentive plans, the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) and the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2009 Plan”) that provide for stock-based employee compensation. We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Stock Compensation.” Compensation expense is recognized on a graded method under the 2006 Plan and on a straight-line basis under the 2009 Plan over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value of the options and restricted stock awards. Under the 2006 Plan, we historically used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of our stock based payment awards, but beginning October 28, 2009 under our 2009 Plan we began using an enhanced Hull-White Trinomial model. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payments remains uncertainutilizing the Black-Scholes model and we have determined that we will continue to recognize prompt paymentthe enhanced Hull-White Trinomial model is affected by Holdings’ stock price and a number of assumptions, including expected volatility, risk-free interest income when received.rate, expected term, expected dividends yield, expected forfeiture rate, expected turn-over rate and the expected exercise multiple. Equity grants may no longer be granted under the 2006 Plan.

New Accounting Pronouncements

We do not believe any recentlyIn May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued butAccounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP and will be effective for us as of January 1, 2018. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition method and we have not yet selected which transition method we will apply. Our evaluation of ASU 2014-09 is not complete. The FASB has issued and may issue in the future, interpretative guidance, which may cause our evaluation to change. We have completed an initial review to determine the impact ASU 2014-09 and its subsequent updates through December 31, 2016 will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements or financial statement disclosures upon adoption. Based on our preliminary review, we believe that the timing and measurement of revenue for our customers will be similar to our current revenue recognition. However, this view is preliminary and could change based on the detailed analysis associated with the conversion and implementation phases of our ASU 2014-09 project. We will complete our assessment during 2017.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,“Leases” which replaces existing leasing rules with a comprehensive lease measurement and recognition standard and expanded disclosure requirements. ASU 2016-02 will require lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets as liabilities, with corresponding “right-of-use” assets and is effective accounting standardsfor annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, subject to early adoption. For income statement recognition purposes, leases will be classified as either a finance or an operating lease. We will be required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. Upon initial evaluation, we believe that the new standard will have a material effectimpact on our consolidatedConsolidated Balance Sheets but it will not affect our liquidity. We are continuing to evaluate other potential impacts to our financial statements and accounting systems including whether we will need to secure new software to account for the change in leases.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” ASU 2016-09 allows for simplification of several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Under ASU 2016-09, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (including tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards) should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. ASU 2016-09 also requires recognition of excess tax benefits regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the current period. ASU 2016-09 further permits the withholding of an amount up to employees’ maximum individual tax rate in the relevant jurisdiction without resulting in a liability classification. ASU 2016-09 also requires any excess tax benefits be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity and cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes to be classified as a financing activity. ASU 2016-09 is effective for public companies for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-09 on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments (Topic 326) Credit Losses.” ASU 2016-13 changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments. Under the new standard, entities holding financial assets, including accounts receivables and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income are to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. An allowance for credit losses will be a valuation account that will be deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. ASU 2016-13 is effective as of January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-13.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” This standard amends and adjusts how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years and will require adoption on a retrospective basis unless impracticable. If impracticable we would be required to apply the amendments prospectively as of the earliest date possible. We are currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-15 will have on our statement of financial position resultsor financial statement disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The new guidance eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of operations or cash flows.goodwill (i.e., Step 2 of the current goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, entities will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value (i.e., measure the charge based on the current Step 1). ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual and any interim impairment tests for periods beginning after December 15, 2019. We are currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2017-04 to determine how our goodwill impairment testing will be impacted and whether we may elect to adopt ASU 2017-04 prior to the stated effective date.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

We had outstanding letters of credit of $12.4$16.7 million at December 31, 2013.2016. These standby letters of credit benefit our third partythird-party insurer for our high deductible workers’ compensation insurance program. The amount of the letters of credit is negotiated annually in conjunction with the insurance renewals. We anticipate our commitment will increase as we continue to grow our business and more years become our responsibility as responsibility shifts from the former owners of Addus HealthCare to us.business.

The following table summarizes our cash contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013:2016:

 

Contractual Obligations

  Total   Less than
1 Year
   1-2
Years
   3-4
Years
   More than
5 Years
   Total   Less than
1 Year
   1-2
Years
   3-4
Years
   More than
5 Years
 
  (in thousands)   (Amounts in Thousands) 

Term loan, 3.79% due 2020

   24,063    1,250    2,500    20,313    —   

Interest payable on term loan(1)

   3,243    916    1,669    658    —   

Capital leases

   2,617    1,561    1,056    —      —   

Operating leases

  $16,929    $2,964    $4,962    $3,075    $5,928     16,515    3,855    5,565    3,675    3,420 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Contractual Obligations

  $46,438   $7,582   $10,790   $24,646   $3,420 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

(1)

As described in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 7. Long-Term Debt, interest on borrowings under the term loan are variable. The calculated interest payable amounts above use actual rates available through March 2017 and assumes the March 2017 rate of 3.79% for all future interest payable.

As described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the acquisition agreement for Aid & Assist at Home, LLC contains a contingent earn-out obligation, which expired December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, we determined there was no liability for the Aid & Assist at Home, LLC contingent earn-out obligation.

Impact of Inflation

We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. If our costs were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures, we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases. Our inability or failure to do so could harm our business, financial condition and results of operation.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Historically, we have beenWe are exposed to market risk dueassociated with changes in interest rates on our variable rate long-term debt. As of December 31, 2016, we had outstanding borrowings of approximately $24.1 million on our credit facility, all of which was subject to fluctuations invariable interest rates. As of December 31, 2013,2015, we had no outstanding indebtedness and therefore no current exposure.borrowings on our credit facility. If the variable rates on this debt were 100 basis points higher than the rate applicable to the borrowing during the year ended December 31, 2016, our net income would have decreased by $0.2 million, or $0.01 per diluted share. We do not currently have any derivative or hedging arrangements, or other known exposures, to changes in interest rates.

 

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements together with the related notes and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm, are set forth on the pages indicated in Part IV, Item 15.

 

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013.2016. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a companyan issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a companyan issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’sSecurities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a companyan issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’sissuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2013 due to the material weaknesses identified in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting below.

In light of the material weaknesses described below, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure that our financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, we believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations, changes in shareholder’s equity and cash flows for the periods presented.2016.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013), our management concluded our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.

Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

UnderIn accordance with SEC regulations, management excluded from its assessment the supervisioninternal control over financial reporting of South Shore Home Health Service Inc., which was acquired on February 5, 2016 and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and our principalwhose financial officer, we conducted an evaluationstatements constitute 7.9% of the effectivenesstotal assets of the Company as of December 31, 2016 and 12.9% and (7.0)% of the Company’s revenues and net income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2016.

BDO USA, LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting, based on the frameworkwhich is included herein.

Changes in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992).Controls Over Financial Reporting

A material weakness (as defined in SEC Rulerule 12b-2) is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. During the fourth

Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework,

quarter of 2015, our management has determined that certaina material weaknessesweakness in internal control over financial reporting existedexisted. Specifically, controls regarding segregation of duties and user access as well as monitoring and review controls related to billable and non-billable transactions were ineffective. There were insufficient controls over validating the completeness and accuracy of underlying data used in the operation of monitoring controls as well as ineffective controls related to review of new hire, terminations and payroll changes. Because the Company’s revenue and payroll are dependent on the effectiveness of these controls, these deficiencies, in the aggregate, resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s revenue or payroll expense may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis as of December 31, 2013. Specifically, we had one2015.

To remediate the material weakness in information technology controls due to an aggregation of deficiencies relating to segregation of duties, user access, and change management controls in key information technology systems. We had a second material weakness in payroll processes due to an aggregation of deficiencies relating to the information technology deficiencies described above, ineffective controls over payroll changes, and ineffective review and monitoring controls.

As a result of the material weaknesses described above, management has concludedduring 2016 we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an auditors’ report on the effectiveness ofhave implemented actions to improve our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, which report appears in Item 9B of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In accordance with SEC regulations, management excluded from its assessment the internal control overand procedures including hiring financial reporting at Coordinated Home Health Care, an asset purchase, which was acquired on December 1, 2013leadership and whose financial statements constitute 8.1% of total assets as of December 31, 2013 and 0.7% of revenuespersonnel for the year ended December 31, 2013.

To remediatefinance organization with appropriate experience and certification. Also, we have supplemented and enhanced resources and training for our organization. We effected proper tone at the top through these personnel changes and changes in our policies. The personnel in these new functions established a structure that allows us to validate the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the operation of monitoring controls. We have implemented changes to user access to properly segregate duties and programmatic enhancements to the time maintenance process to improve monitoring and review controls of transactions. We have improved our monitoring and review controls for new hires, terminations, and payroll changes. Also, management redesigned processes, implemented more robust accounting policies, and introduced new management review controls. As a result, we have improved the timeliness and the level of precision of our control activities. During the fourth quarter of 2016, we successfully completed the testing necessary to conclude that the material weaknessesweakness has been remediated.

Other than the changes described above, we intend to engage an expert consultant in information technology controls to assist in improving the design and effectiveness of controls in this area. In addition, we are planning the implementation of a comprehensive payroll and human resources information system that will remediate deficiencies identified in payroll.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There wasthere were no changechanges in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this reportfiscal quarter ended December 31, 2016, that hashave materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We have hired a director of internal audit and have engaged a consulting firm to assist us with effecting the changes necessary to correct our internal control deficiencies.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Addus HomeCare Corporation

Palatine, ILDowners Grove, Illinois

We have audited Addus HomeCare Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Control – Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Addus HomeCare Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As indicated in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of CoordinatedSouth Shore Home Health Care,Services Inc., which was acquired on December 1, 2013,February 5, 2016, and which is included in the consolidated balance sheets of Addus HomeCare Corporation as of December 31, 2013,2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations,income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. CoordinatedSouth Shore Home Health CareServices Inc., constituted 8.1%7.9% of total assets as of December 31, 2013,2016, and 0.7%12.9% and (7.0)% of revenues and net income (loss), respectively, for the year then ended. Management did not assess the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of CoordinatedSouth Shore Home Health CareServices Inc. because of the timing of the acquisition which was completed on December 1, 2013.February 5, 2016. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Addus HomeCare Corporation also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of CoordinatedSouth Shore Home Health Care.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Material weaknesses regarding

management’s failure to design and maintain controls over payroll monitoring controls and information technology controls related to user access and program changes have been identified and described in management’s assessment. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2013 financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 17, 2014 on those financial statements.Services Inc.

In our opinion, Addus HomeCare Corporation did not maintain,maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on the COSO criteria.

We do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on management’s statements referring to any corrective actions taken by the company after the date of management’s assessment.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Addus HomeCare Corporation as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations,income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132016 and our report dated March 17, 201415, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

/s/    BDO USA, LLP

Chicago, IL

March 17, 2014

Chicago, Illinois

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.March 15, 2017

PART III

Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K as we intend to file our definitive Proxy Statement for the 20132017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report, and certain information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the 20142017 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC withinnot later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.2016.

The Company has adopted a Code of Conduct that is applicable to all of its employees, officers and members of its Board of Directors, and its subsidiaries. A copy of the current version of our Code of Conduct is available in the Investors — Corporate Governance section of our internet website at http://www.addus.com/index.htm. A copy of the Code of Conduct is also available in print, free of charge, to any stockholder who requests it by writing to Addus HomeCare Corporation, 2300 Warrenville Road, Downers Grove, IL 60515. The Company intends to post amendments to or waivers, if any, from its Code of Conduct at this location on its website, in each case to the extent such amendment or waiver would otherwise require the filing of a Current Report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 5.05 thereof.

 

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the 20142017 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC withinnot later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.2016.

 

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the 20142017 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC withinnot later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.2016.

 

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the 20142017 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC withinnot later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.2016.

 

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTINGACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the 20142017 Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC withinnot later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.2016.

PART IV

 

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

 (a)Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 1.Consolidated Financial Statements. The consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements as listed in the accompanying “Index to Consolidated Financial Information” in page F-1 are filed as part of this Annual Report.

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or are not required or the information required to be set forth in those schedules is included in the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements or related notes. All other schedules not listed in the accompanying index have been omitted as they are either not required or not applicable, or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto.

 

 (b)Exhibits

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit


Number

  

Description of Document

  3.1  Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Addus HomeCare Corporation dated as of November 2,October 27, 2009 (filed on November 20, 2009 as Exhibit 3.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).
  3.2  Amended and Restated Bylaws of Addus HomeCare Corporation, as amended by the First Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws (filed on September 21, 2009May 9, 2013 as Exhibit 3.53.2 to Amendment No. 2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statementthe Company’s Quarterly Report on Form S-110-Q (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).
  4.1  Form of Common Stock Certificate (filed on October 2, 2009 as Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).
  4.2  Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 19, 2006, by and among Addus HomeCareHolding Corporation, Eos Capital Partners III, L.P., Eos Partners SBIC III, L.P., Freeport Loan Fund LLC, W. Andrew Wright, III, Addus Term Trust, W. Andrew Wright Grantor Retained Annuity Trust, Mark S. Heaney, James A. Wright and Courtney E. Panzer (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 4.24.3 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).
10.1  Separation and General Release Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2009, between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and W. Andrew Wright, III (filed on September 21, 2009 as Exhibit 10.1(b) to Amendment No. 2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.2Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated May 6, 2008, between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Mark S. Heaney (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.3Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated September 30, 2009, between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Mark S. Heaney (filed on October 2, 2009 as Exhibit 10.2(a) to Amendment No. 4 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.4Employment Agreement, dated November 29, 2010, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Dennis Meulemans (filed on December 1, 2010 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated by reference herein)

Exhibit

Number

Description of Document

  10.5  Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated August 27, 2007, between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Darby Anderson (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.4 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).*
  10.610.3  Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated September 30, 2009, between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Darby Anderson (filed on October 2, 2009 as Exhibit 10.4(a) to Amendment No. 4 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).*

Exhibit
Number

Description of Document

  10.710.4  Addus HealthCare, Inc. Home Health and Home Care Division Vice President and Regional Director Bonus Plan(filedPlan (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.10 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).*
  10.810.5  Addus HealthCare, Inc. Support Center Vice President and Department Director Bonus Plan (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 101110.11 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement onForm S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).*
  10.910.6  Addus Holding Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.12 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).*
  10.1010.7  Director Form of Option Award Agreement under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.13 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).*
  10.1110.8  Executive Form of Option Award Agreement under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.14 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).*
  10.1210.9  Form of Indemnification Agreement (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.16 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).
  10.1310.10  License Agreement, dated March 24, 2006, between McKesson Information Solutions, LLC and Addus HealthCare, Inc. (filed on August 26, 2009 as Exhibit 10.17 to Amendment No. 1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).
  10.1410.11  Contract Supplement to the License Agreement No. C0608555, dated March 24, 2006 (filed on August 26, 2009 as Exhibit 10.17(a)10.17 to Amendment No. 1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).
  10.1510.12  Contract Supplement to the License Agreement No. 00608555, dated March 28, 2006 (filed on August 26, 2009 as Exhibit 10.17(b) to Amendment No. 1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).
  10.1610.13  Amendment to License Agreement No. C0608555, dated March 28, 2006, between McKesson Information Solutions, LLC and Addus HealthCare, Inc. (filed on August 26, 2009 as Exhibit 10.17(c) to Amendment No. 1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement onForm S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.17Lease, dated April 1, 1999, between W. Andrew Wright, III and Addus HealthCare, Inc. (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.18 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement onForm S-1 and incorporated by reference herein).
  10.1810.14  First Amendment to Lease, dated asForm of April 1, 2002, between W. Andrew Wright, III and Addus HealthCare, Inc. (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.18(a) to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)

Exhibit

Number

Description of Document

  10.19Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of September 19, 2006, between W. Andrew Wright, III and Addus HealthCare, Inc. (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.18(b) to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.20Third Amendment to Lease, dated as of September 1, 2008, between W. Andrew Wright, III and Addus HealthCare, Inc. (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.18(c) to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.21Addus HomeCare Corporation 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (filed on September 21, 2009 as Exhibit 10.20 to Amendment No. 2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).*
  10.2210.15  Form of IncentiveNonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement underpursuant to the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (filed on September 21, 2009 as Exhibit 10.20(a) to Amendment No. 2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).*
  10.2310.16  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under thepursuant to 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (filed on September 21, 2009 as Exhibit 10.20(b) to Amendment No. 2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).*
  10.2410.17  Loan and SecurityThe Executive Nonqualified “Excess” Plan Adoption Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2009, by and among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., Fort Smith Home Health Agency, Inc., Little Rock Home Health Agency, Inc., Lowell Home Health Agency, Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation and Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., as borrowers, Fifth Third Bank, as agent, the financial institutions that are or may from time to time become parties thereto, and Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantordated April 1, 2012 (filed on NovemberApril 5, 20092012 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.25Consent and Amendment No. 1 to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2010, by and among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., Fort Smith Home Health Agency, Inc., Little Rock Home Health Agency, Inc., Lowell Home Health Agency, Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation and Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., as borrowers, Fifth Third Bank, as agent, the financial institutions that are or may from time to time become parties thereto, and Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantor (filed on March 18, 2010 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.26Joinder, Consent and Amendment No. 2 to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2010, by and among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (South Carolina), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., Fort Smith Home Health Agency, Inc., Little Rock Home Health Agency, Inc., Lowell Home Health Agency, Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation and Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., as borrowers, Fifth Third Bank, as agent, the financial institutions that are or may from time to time become parties thereto, and Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantor (filed on July 27, 2010 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated by reference herein).*

Exhibit


Number

  

Description of Document

  10.2710.18  Joinder, ConsentThe Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan Document, dated April 1, 2012 (filed on April 5, 2012 as Exhibit 99.2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and Amendment No. 3 to the Loan and Securityincorporated herein by reference).*
10.19Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2011,February 7, 2013, by and among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho),its subsidiaries identified therein, LHC Group, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., Fort Smith Home Health Agency, Inc., Little Rock Home Health Agency, Inc., Lowell Home Health Agency, Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation and Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., Addus HealthCare (South Carolina), Inc. Addus HealthCare (Delaware), Inc., as borrowers, Fifth Third Bank, as agent, the financial institutions that are or may from time to time become parties thereto, and Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantorits subsidiaries identified therein (filed on May 25, 2011March 6, 2013 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated herein by reference)reference herein).
  10.2810.20  Amendment No. 4 to LoanAmended and SecurityRestated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2011, effective as of June 30, 2011, by andAugust 11, 2014, among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., Fort Smith Home Health Agency, Inc., Little Rock Home Health Agency, Inc., Lowell Home Health Agency, Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation, Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., Addus Healthcare (South Carolina), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Delaware), Inc. and Cura Partners, LLC, as borrowers, Addus HomeCare Corporation, the other credit parties from time to a time a party thereto, the various institutions from time to time a party thereto, as lenders, and Fifth Third Bank as agent and L/C issuer (filed on August 11, 2014 as Exhibit 10.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No.001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).
10.21Amendment No 1. to Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of November 6, 2014 and effective as of September 30, 2014, among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation, Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., Addus HealthCare (South Carolina), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Delaware), Inc. and Cura Partners, LLC, as borrowers, Addus HomeCare Corporation, the other credit parties from time to time a party thereto, the various institutions from time to time a party thereto, as lenders, and Fifth Third Bank as agent and L/C issuer (filed on November 7, 2014 as Exhibit 10.2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).
10.22Consent and Amendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, effective May 24, 2016, among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation, Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., Addus HealthCare (South Carolina), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Delaware), Inc., Cura Partners, LLC, Priority Home Health Care, Inc. and South Shore Home Health Service Inc., as borrowers, Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantor, the other credit parties from time to time party thereto, the various institutions from time to time party thereto, as lenders, and Fifth Third Bank, as agent the financial institutions from time to time parties thereto, and Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantorL/C issuer (filed on July 29, 2011May 24, 2016 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated herein by reference)reference herein).
10.23Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, effective December 15, 2014, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Maxine Hochhauser (filed on December 15, 2014 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.24Amendment to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, effective December 15, 2014, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Darby Anderson (filed on December 15, 2014 as Exhibit 99.2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).*

Exhibit
Number

Description of Document

10.25Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, effective May 11, 2015, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Donald Klink (filed on April 30, 2015 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.26Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2015, by and among Addus Healthcare, Inc., Margaret Coffey, Carol Kolar, South Shore Home Health Service, Inc. and Acaring Home Care, LLC (filed on May 8, 2015 as Exhibit 10.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).
10.27Second Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2015, among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation, Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., Addus HealthCare (South Carolina), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Delaware), Inc., Cura Partners, LLC and Priority Home Health Care, Inc., as borrowers, Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantor, the other credit parties from time to time party thereto, the various institutions from time to time party thereto, as lenders, and Fifth Third Bank, as agent and L/C issuer (filed on November 16, 2015 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).
10.28Employment Agreement, dated November 29, 2010, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Dennis Meulemans (filed on December 1, 2010 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.29Separation Agreement and General Release, dated as of April 29, 2015, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Dennis Meulemans (filed on April 30, 2015 as Exhibit 99.2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.30Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated May 6, 2008, between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Mark S. Heaney (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.31Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated September 30, 2009, between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Mark S. Heaney (filed on October 2, 2009 as Exhibit 10.2(a) to Amendment No. 4 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-160634) and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.32  Amendment No. 2 to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated November 17, 2011, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Mark S. Heaney (filed on November 23, 2011 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated herein by reference)reference herein).*
  10.3010.33  Amendment No. 5 to LoanEmployment and SecurityNon-Competition Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2012,February 25, 2016, by and amongbetween Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., Fort Smith Home Health Agency, Inc., Little Rock Home Health Agency, Inc., Lowell Home Health Agency, Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation, Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., Addus HealthCare (South Carolina), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Delaware), Inc., as borrowers, Fifth Third Bank, as agent, the financial institutions from time to time parties thereto, and Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantorJames Zoccoli (filed on March 16, 2012 as Exhibit 10.41 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
  10.31Summary of Independent Director Compensation Policy (filed on March 16, 2012 as Exhibit 10.42 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
  10.32The Executive Nonqualified “Excess” Plan Adoption Agreement, by Addus HealthCare, Inc., dated April 1, 2012 (filed on April 5, 2012February 29, 2016 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).*
  10.3310.34  The Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan Document,Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated April 1, 2012as of February 29, 2016, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and R. Dirk Allison (filed on April 5, 2012March 2, 2016 as Exhibit 99.299.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated herein by reference)reference herein).*

Exhibit
Number

Description of Document

  10.3410.35Separation Agreement and General Release, dated as of March 18, 2016, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Inna Berkovich (filed on March 23, 2016 as Exhibit 10.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.36  Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, effective May 10, 2016, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Brian Poff (filed on May 12, 2016 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.37Separation Agreement and General Release, effective May 25, 2016, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Donald Klink (filed on May 27, 2016 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.38Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, effective June 1, 2016, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Brenda Belger (filed on June 1, 2016 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.39Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of June 18, 2012, by and between Addus Healthcare,HealthCare, Inc. and Inna Berkovich (filed on June 20, 2012 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated herein by reference)reference herein).*
  10.3510.40  Asset PurchaseSeparation Agreement and General Release, dated as of February 7, 2013,March 1, 2016, by and amongbetween Addus HealthCare, Inc., its subsidiaries identified therein, LHC Group, Inc.HomeCare Corporation and its subsidiaries identified thereinMark S. Heaney (filed on March 6, 20132, 2016 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein)

Exhibit

Number

Description of Document

.*
10.41Employment Agreement, dated January 16, 2017, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and W. Bradley Bickham (filed on January 4, 2017 as Exhibit 10.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).*
10.42Separation Agreement and General Release, dated as of February 13, 2017, by and between Addus HomeCare Corporation and Maxine Hochhauser (filed on January 18, 2017 as Exhibit 10.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-34504) and incorporated by reference herein).*
21.1  Subsidiaries of the Addus HomeCare Corporation (filed on March 28, 2011 as Exhibit 22.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
23.1  Consent of BDO USA, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*Firm
31.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*2002.
31.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*2002.
32.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**2002.
32.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**2002.
101  The following materials from Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013,2016, formatted in Extensive Business Reporting Language (XBRL), (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations,Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

*Filed herewith
**Furnished herewithManagement compensatory plan or arrangement

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Addus HomeCare Corporation
By: 

/s/    R. DS/    MARKIRK S. HAEANEYLLISON        

 

Mark S. Heaney,R. Dirk Allison,

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 17, 201415, 2017

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated:

 

Signature

  

Title

 

Date

/s/    MR. DARKIRK S. HAEANEYLLISON        

R. Dirk Allison

  

President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal

March 17, 2014
Mark S. Heaney

Executive Officer) and Director

 March 15, 2017

/s/    DENNIS B. MEULEMANS      Brian Poff        

Brian Poff

  

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and

March 17, 2014
Dennis B. Meulemans

Accounting Officer)

 March 15, 2017

/s/    MARK L. FIRST        

Mark L. First

  

Director

 March 17, 2014
Mark L. First15, 2017

/s/    SIMON A. BACHLEDA        

Simon A. Bachleda

  

Director

 March 17, 2014
Simon A. Bachleda15, 2017

/s/    STEVEN I. GERINGER        

Steven I. Geringer

  

Director

 March 17, 2014
Steven I. Geringer15, 2017

/s/    R. DMIRKICHAEL AELLISONARLEY        

Michael Earley

  

Director

 March 17, 201415, 2017

/s/    Darin J. Gordon        

R. Dirk AllisonDarin J. Gordon

  

Director

 March 15, 2017

/s/    Susan T. Weaver, M.D., FACP         

Susan T. Weaver, M.D., FACP

Director

March 15, 2017

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

   Page 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   F-2 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

   F-3 

Consolidated Statements of OperationsIncome

   F-4 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

   F-5 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

   F-6 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   F-7 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Addus HomeCare Corporation

Palatine,Downers Grove, Illinois

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Addus HomeCare Corporation as of December 31, 20132016 and 20122015 and the related consolidated statements of operations,income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013.2016. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and schedule. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Addus HomeCare Corporation at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flowflows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013,2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed the presentation of its deferred tax assets and liabilities in its consolidated balance sheets due to the adoption of FASB ASU2015-17—Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Addus HomeCare Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 17, 201415, 2017 expressed an adverseunqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

/s/    BDO USA, LLP

Chicago, Illinois

March 15, 2017

Chicago, IL

March 17, 2014

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31, 20132016 and 20122015

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)

 

  2013   2012   2016   2015 

Assets

Assets

        

Current assets

Current assets

        

Cash

Cash

  $15,565    $1,737    $8,013   $4,104 

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $4,140 and $4,466 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively

   61,354     71,303  

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $7,363 and $4,850 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively

   116,999    84,959 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   6,235     7,293     5,998    4,858 

Assets held for sale, net

   —       245  

Deferred tax assets

   8,326     7,258  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current assets

Total current assets

   91,480     87,836     131,010    93,921 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization

   2,634     2,489     6,648    8,619 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Other assets

Other assets

        

Goodwill

Goodwill

   60,026     50,536     73,906    68,844 

Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization

Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization

   8,762     6,370     15,413    10,351 

Investment in joint venture

Investment in joint venture

   900     —       900    900 

Deferred tax assets

   —       2,328  

Non-current deferred tax asset, net

   3,153    1,825 

Other assets

Other assets

   132     298     —      1,337 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total other assets

Total other assets

   69,820     59,532     93,372    83,257 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total assets

Total assets

  $163,934    $149,857    $231,030   $185,797 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

        

Current liabilities

Current liabilities

        

Accounts payable

Accounts payable

  $4,633    $4,117    $4,486   $4,748 

Current portion of long-term debt, net of debt issuance costs

   2,531    1,109 

Current portion of contingent earn-out obligation

   —      1,250 

Accrued expenses

Accrued expenses

   41,945     32,717     42,603    35,082 

Current maturities of long-term debt

   —       208  

Deferred revenue

   59     2,148  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current liabilities

Total current liabilities

   46,637     39,190     49,620    42,189 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities

   3,441     —    

Long-term debt, less current maturities

   —       16,250  

Long-term liabilities

    

Long-term debt, less current portion, net of debt issuance costs

   22,482    1,882 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities

Total liabilities

   50,078     55,440    $72,102   $44,071 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Commitments, contingencies and other matters

    

Stockholders’ equity

Stockholders’ equity

        

Common stock—$.001 par value; 40,000 authorized and 10,913 and 10,823 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively

   11     11  

Common stock—$.001 par value; 40,000 authorized and 11,527 and 11,108 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively

  $12   $11 

Additional paid-in capital

Additional paid-in capital

   83,072     82,778     92,253    87,076 

Retained earnings

Retained earnings

   30,773     11,628     66,663    54,639 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

Total stockholders’ equity

   113,856     94,417     158,928    141,726 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $163,934    $149,857    $231,030   $185,797 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

See accompanying notesNotes to consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSINCOME

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)

 

  For the Year Ended December 31,   For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2013 2012 2011   2016 2015 2014 

Net service revenues

  $265,941   $244,315   $230,105    $400,688  $336,815  $312,942 

Cost of service revenues

   198,202    180,264    168,632     294,593   245,492   229,207 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   67,739    64,051    61,473     106,095   91,323   83,735 

General and administrative expenses

   50,118    46,362    45,858     84,213   70,452   61,834 

Revaluation of contingent consideration

   —      —      (469   —     130   —   

Gain on sale of agency

   —      (495  —    

Depreciation and amortization

   2,160    2,521    3,167     6,647   4,717   3,830 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total operating expenses

   52,278    48,388    48,556     90,860   75,299   65,664 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income from continuing operations

   15,461    15,663    12,917     15,235   16,024   18,071 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Interest income

   (188  (155  (2,263   (2,812  (47  (18

Interest expense

   674    1,723    2,524     2,332   786   698 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total interest expense, net

   486    1,568    261  

Total interest (income) expense, net

   (480  739   680 

Other income

   206   —     —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

   14,975    14,095    12,656     15,921   15,285   17,391 

Income tax expense

   3,812    4,807    4,244     3,994   3,932   5,428 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

   11,163    9,288    8,412     11,927   11,353   11,963 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Discontinued operations:

    

Net loss from home health business

   (980  (1,653  (10,393

Gain on sale of home health business, net of tax

   8,962    —      —    

Earnings from discontinued operations

   97   270   280 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings (losses) from discontinued operations

   7,982    (1,653  (10,393

Net income

  $12,024  $11,623  $12,243 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss)

  $19,145   $7,635   $(1,981
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share

    

Basic income (loss) per share

    

Net income per common share

    

Basic income per share

    

Continuing operations

  $1.03   $0.86   $0.78    $1.05  $1.03  $1.10 

Discontinued operations

   0.74    (0.15  (0.96   0.01   0.03   0.02 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Basic income (loss) per share

  $1.77   $0.71   $(0.18

Basic income per share

  $1.06  $1.06  $1.12 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted income (loss) per share

    

Diluted income per share

    

Continuing operations

  $1.01   $0.86   $0.78    $1.05  $1.02  $1.08 

Discontinued operations

   0.72    (0.15  (0.96   0.01   0.02   0.02 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted income (loss) per share

  $1.73   $0.71   $(0.18

Diluted income per share

  $1.06  $1.04  $1.10 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding:

        

Basic

   10,826    10,764    10,752     11,292   10,986   10,900 

Diluted

   11,075    10,784    10,752     11,349   11,189   11,114 

See accompanying notesNotes to consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(amounts and shares in thousands)

 

  

 

Common Stock

   Additional
Paid in
Capital
  Retained
Earnings
  Total
Stockholders’
Equity
   Common Stock   Additional
Paid in
Capital
   Retained
Earnings
   Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 
  Shares Amount      Shares Amount             

Balance at December 31, 2010

   10,751    11     82,106    5,974    88,091  

Balance at December 31, 2013

   10,913  $11   $83,072   $30,773   $113,856 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Issuance of shares of common stock under restricted stock award agreements

   24    —       —      —      —       36   —      —      —      —   

Stock-based compensation

   —      —       331    —      331     —     —      827    —      827 

Net loss

   —      —       —      (1,981  (1,981

Balance at December 31, 2011

   10,775    11     82,437    3,993    86,441  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Issuance of shares of common stock under restricted stock award agreements

   43  �� —       —      —      —    

Stock-based compensation

   —      —       341    —      341  

Shares issued

   5   —       —      —      —    

Net income

   —      —       —      7,635    7,635  

Balance at December 31, 2012

   10,823   $11    $82,778   $11,628   $94,417  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Issuance of shares of common stock under restricted stock award agreements

   63    —       —      —      —    

Stock-based compensation

   —      —       515    —      515  

Common shares withheld for witholding taxes on exercise of options

   (67  —       (221  —      (221

Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options

   —     —      816    —      816 

Shares issued

   94    —       —      —      —       61   —      214    —      214 

Net income

   —      —       —      19,145    19,145     —     —      —      12,243    12,243 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

   10,913   $11    $83,072   $30,773   $113,856  

Balance at December 31, 2014

   11,010  $11   $84,929   $43,016   $127,956 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Issuance of shares of common stock under restricted stock award agreements

   57   —      —      —      —   

Forfeiture of shares of common stock under restricted stock award agreements

   (3  —      —      —      —   

Stock-based compensation

   —     —      1,573    —      1,573 

Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options

   —     —      269    —      269 

Shares issued

   44   —      305    —      305 

Net income

   —     —      —      11,623    11,623 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

   11,108  $11   $87,076   $54,639   $141,726 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Issuance of shares of common stock under restricted stock award agreements

   108   0    0    —      0 

Forfeiture of shares of common stock under restricted stock award agreements

   (69  0    0    —      0 

Stock-based compensation

   —     —      1,072    —      1,072 

Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options

   —     —      1,090    —      1,090 

Shares issued

   380   1    3,015    —      3,016 

Net income

   —     —      —      12,024    12,024 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

   11,527  $12   $92,253   $66,663   $158,928 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

See accompanying notesNotes to consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014

(amounts in thousands)

 

  For the Year 
  For the Year
Ended  December 31,
  Ended December 31, 
  2013 2012 2011   2016 2015 2014 

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Net income (loss)

  $19,145   $7,635   $(1,981

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Net income

  $12,024  $11,623  $12,243 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities, net of acquisitions:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   2,160    2,544    3,554     6,647   4,717   3,830 

Non-cash restructuring

   2,550   —     —   

Deferred income taxes

   4,701    839    (4,663   (1,328  838   2,221 

Stock-based compensation

   515    341    331     1,072   1,573   827 

Amortization of debt issuance costs

   166    215    224     357   97   154 

Provision for doubtful accounts

   3,019    2,877    4,275     7,373   4,309   2,818 

Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charge

   —      —      15,989  

Revaluation of contingent consideration

     (469   —     130   —   

(Gain) on sale home health business

   (15,284  —      —    

(Gain) loss on sale of agency

   —      (495  43  

Changes in operating accounts, net of acquisitions:

    

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:

    

Accounts receivable

   7,818    (1,812  (5,689   (32,606  (19,512  (9,276

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   1,061    (18  1,433     (282  2,318   (873

Other Assets

   —      —      —    

Accounts payable

   435    (1,149  1,962     (1,530  570   (850

Accrued expenses

   3,758    4,425    934     4,980   (2,557  (4,066

Deferred revenue

   (101  3    4  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   27,393    15,405    15,947  

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

   (743  4,106   7,028 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Acquisitions of businesses

   (12,325  —      (500   (20,026  (8,365  (7,172

Net proceeds from sale of home health business

   16,105    —      —    

Net proceeds from sale of agency

   —      495    —    

Acquisition of customer list

   —     (146  (50

Purchases of property and equipment

   (887  (1,114  (551   (1,712  (2,213  (5,274
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   2,893    (619  (1,051

Net cash used in investing activities

   (21,738  (10,724  (12,496
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

Net borrowings (repayments) on term loan

   (208  (2,500  (2,292

Net (payments) borrowings on revolving credit loan

   (16,250  (8,500  (8,500

Payments on subordinated dividend notes

   —      (4,069  (2,500

Debt issuance costs

   —      —      (34

Net borrowings (repayments) on other notes payable

   —      —      (366

Payments on term loan

   (938  —     —   

Payments on revolver

   (27,000  —     —   

Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options

   1,090   269   816 

Payment on contingent earn-out obligation

   (100  (1,000  —   

Payments for debt issuance costs

   (503  (1,165  (290

Cash received from exercise of stock options

   3,016   305   214 

Borrowings on revolver

   27,000   —     —   

Borrowings on term loan

   25,000   —     —   

Borrowings on capital lease obligations

   —     —     2,896 

Payments on capital lease obligations

   (1,175  (1,050  (370
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (16,458  (15,069  (13,692

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   26,390   (2,641  3,266 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net change in cash

   13,828    (283  1,204     3,909   (9,259  (2,202

Cash, at beginning of period

   1,737    2,020    816     4,104   13,363   15,565 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash, at end of period

  $15,565   $1,737   $2,020    $8,013  $4,104  $13,363 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

        

Cash paid for interest

  $725   $1,557   $2,337    $2,322  $786  $698 

Cash paid for income taxes

   5,689    1,758    2,005     5,087   911   4,465 

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities

        

Contingent and deferred consideration accrued for acquisitions

  $1,100   $—     $—      $—    $—    $1,020 

Property and equipment acquired through capital lease obligations

   618   378   1,137 

Tax benefit related to the amortization of tax goodwill in excess of book basis

   160    159    159     203   123   123 

See accompanying notesNotes to consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)

1. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Description of Business

The consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Addus HomeCare Corporation (“Holdings”) and its subsidiaries (together with Holdings, the “Company” or “we”). The Company provides homeoperates as one reportable business segment and community basedis a provider of comprehensive personal care services, through a networkwhich are provided primarily in the home. The Company’s personal care services provide assistance with activities of locations throughout the United States. These servicesdaily living and adult day services. The Company’s consumers are primarily performed in the homespersons who are at risk of the consumers. The Company’s home and community based services include assistance tohospitalization or institutionalization, such as the elderly, chronically ill and disabled with bathing, grooming, dressing, personal hygiene and medication reminders, and other activities of daily living. Home and community based services are primarily performed under agreements withdisabled. The Company’s payor clients include federal, state and local governmental agencies.

Discontinued Operations

On February 7, 2013, subsidiariesagencies, managed care organizations, commercial insurers and private individuals. As of Holdings entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with LHC Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Home Health Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the Home Health Purchase Agreement, effective March 1, 2013, the purchasers agreed to acquire substantially all the assets of the Company’s home health business in Arkansas, Nevada and South Carolina and 90% of its home health business in California and Illinois, withDecember 31, 2016, the Company retaining 10% ownership in such locations, for cash consideration of $20,000.

The Company’s home health services were operated through licensed and Medicare certified offices that provided physical, occupational and speech therapy, as well as skilled nursingpersonal care services to pediatric,over 33,000 consumers (unaudited) through 114 locations across 24 states, including three adult infirm and elderly patients. Home healthday services were reimbursed from Medicare, Medicaid and Medicaid-waiver programs, commercial insurance and private payors (see note 2) of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.centers in Illinois (unaudited).

Principles of Consolidation

All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company’s investment in entities with less than 20% ownership or in which the Company does not have the ability to influence the operations of the investee are being accounted for using the cost method and are included in investments in joint ventures.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generates net service revenues by providing services directly to consumers. The Company receives payments for providing services from federal, state and local governmental agencies, commercial insurers and private individuals.consumers. The Company’s continuing operations as defined in the Business Section in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, are principally provided based on authorized hours, determined by the relevant agency, at an hourly rate specified in agreements or fixed by legislation and recognized as revenues at the time services are rendered. Home and community basedPersonal care service revenues are reimbursed by state, local and other governmental programs which are partially funded by Medicaid or Medicaid waiver programs, with the remainder reimbursed through private dutypay and insurance programs.

Laws and regulations governing the Medicaid and Medicare programs are complex and subject to interpretation. As a result, there is at least a reasonable possibility that recorded estimates may change in the near term. The Company believes that it is in compliance in all material respects with all applicable laws and regulations.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company establishes its allowance for doubtful accounts to the extent it is probable that a portion or all of a particular account will not be collected. The Company estimatesestablishes its provision for doubtful accounts primarily by analyzing historical trends and the aging receivables utilizing eight aging categories, and applyingof receivables. In its historical collection rates to each aging category, taking into considerationevaluation, the Company considers other factors that might impact the use of historical collection rates or payor groups, with certain large payors analyzed separately from other payor groups. In the Company’s evaluation of these estimates, it also considersincluding: delays in payment trends in individual states due to budget or funding issues,issues; billing conversions related to acquisitions or internal systems,systems; resubmission of bills with required documentation and disputes with specific payors. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained at a level that the Company’s management believes is sufficient to cover potential losses. However, actual collections could differ from the Company’s estimates.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the related assets by use of the straight-line method except for internally developed software which is amortized by the sum-of-years digits method. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. The estimated useful lives of the property and equipment are as follows:

 

Computer equipment

  3 – 5 years

Furniture and equipment

  5 – 7 years

Transportation equipment

  5 years

Computer software

  5 – 10 years

Leasehold improvements

  

Lesser of useful life or lease term, unless

probability of lease renewal is likely


ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Goodwill

The Company’s carrying value of goodwill is the residualexcess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired from various acquisitions including the acquisition of Addus HealthCare, Inc. (“Addus HealthCare”). In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets ,”,” goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized. The Company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis, as of October 1, or whenever potential impairment triggers occur, such as a significant change in business climate or regulatory changes that would indicate that an impairment may have occurred. Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are required to be tested for impairment at least annually. The Company may use a qualitative test, known as “Step 0”0,” or a two-step quantitative method to determine whether impairment has occurred. In Step 0, the Company can elect to perform an optional qualitative analysis and based on the results skip the two step analysis. In 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, the Company elected to implement Step 0 and was not required to conduct the remaining two step analysis.

In 2011, The results of the Company elected to evaluateCompany’s Step 0 assessments indicated that it was more likely than not that the goodwill via the two step methodology. The first step in the evaluation of goodwill impairment involves comparing the current fair value of eachits reporting unit to the recordedexceeded its carrying value including goodwill. The Company used the combination of a discounted cash flow model (“DCF model”) and the market multiple analysis method to determine the current fair value of each reporting unit. The DCF model was prepared using revenue and expense projections based on the Company’s current operating plan. As such, a number of significant assumptions and estimates were involved in the application of the DCF model to forecast revenue growth, price changes, gross profits, operating expenses and operating cash flows. In 2011, the

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

cash flows were discounted using a weighted average cost of capital of 14.5%, which was management’s best estimate based on the capital structure oftherefore the Company and external industry data. As part ofconcluded that there were no impairments for the second step of this evaluation, if the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss would be recognized. The Company recorded a $15,989 goodwill and intangible asset charge during the third quarter of 2011 (see Note 6) for its discontinued operations (see Note 2).years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 or 2014.

Intangible Assets

The Company’s identifiable intangible assets consist of customer and referral relationships, trade names, trademarks, state licenses and non-compete agreements. Amortization is computed using straight-line and accelerated methods based upon the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, which range from two to 25twenty-five years.

Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized using the estimated economic benefit method over the useful life and assessed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company recognizeswould recognize an impairment loss when the estimated fair value offuture non-discounted cash flows associated with the intangible asset is less than the carrying value. An impairment charge would then be recorded for the excess of the carrying value over the fair value. The Company estimates the fair value of these intangible assets using the income approach. No impairment charge was recorded for the years ended December 31, 20132016, 2015 or 2012.2014.

The income approach, which the Company uses to estimate the fair value of its reporting units and intangible assets (other than goodwill), is dependent on a number of factors including estimates of future market growth and trends, forecasted revenue and costs, expected periods the assets will be utilized, appropriate discount rates and other variables. The Company bases its fair value estimates on assumptions the Company believes to be reasonable but which are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates. In addition, the

The Company makes certain judgments about the selection of comparable companies used in the market approach in determining its valuation.

We also havehas indefinite-lived intangible assets that are not subject to amortization expense such as certificates of need and licenses to conduct specific operations within geographic markets. OurThe Company’s management has concluded that certificates of need and licenses have indefinite lives, as management has determined that there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, economic or other factors that would limit the useful life of these intangible assets, and we intendthe Company intends to renew and operate the certificates of need and licenses indefinitely. The certificates of need and licenses are tested annually for impairment. No impairment was recorded in 2013for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 or 2012. Based on our 2011 assessment of fair value discussed above, we determined that all of the $0.6 million allocated to discontinued operations certificates of need and licenses were impaired and recorded an impairment loss for 2011.2014.

Debt Issuance Costs

The Company amortizes debt issuance costs on a straight-line method over the term of the related debt. This method approximates the effective interest method.

The Company has classified the debt issuance costs as a

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—Statements—(Continued)

 

reduction of the related long-term debt as of December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2015, debt issuance costs are included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as the Company had no long-term debt outstanding during the year to offset the debt issuance costs.

Workers’ Compensation Program

The Company’s workers’ compensation program has a $350$0.4 million deductible component. The Company recognizes its obligations associated with this program in the period the claim is incurred. The cost of both the claims reported and claims incurred but not reported, up to the deductible, have been accrued based on historical claims experience, industry statistics and an actuarial analysis performed by an independent third party. The future claims payments related to the workers’ compensation program are secured by letters of credit.

Interest Income

Legislation enacted in Illinois law entitles designated service program providers to receive a prompt payment interest penalty based on qualifying services approved for payment that remain unpaid after a designated period of time. As the amount and timing of the receipt of these payments are not certain, the interest income is recognized when received and reported in the statement of operations,income as interest income. The Company received $185, $155 and $2,263$2.8 million in prompt payment interest in 2013, 20122016 and 2011, respectively.did not earn or receive prompt payment interest in 2015 and 2014. While the Company may be owed additional prompt payment interest, the amount and timing of receipt of such payments remains uncertain and the Company has determined that it will continue to recognize prompt payment interest income when received.

Interest Expense

The Company’s interest expense consists of interest costs on its credit facility, capital lease obligations and otheramortization of debt instruments.issuance costs and is reported in the statement of income when incurred.

Other Income

Other income consists of income distributions received from the investment in joint venture. The Company accounts for this income in accordance with ASC Topic 325, “Investments—Other.” The Company recognizes the net accumulated earnings only to the extent distributed by the joint venture on the date received.

Income Tax Expenses

The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes”Taxes.”. The objective of accounting for income taxes is to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in its financial statements or tax returns. Deferred taxes, resulting from differences between the financial and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities, are also adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. ASC Topic 740 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. ASC Topic 740, also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, ASC Topic 740 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, accounting in interim periods and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax positions.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Stock-based Compensation

The Company has two stock incentive plans under which stock-based employee compensation awards are outstanding, the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) and the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “2009 Plan”) that provide for stock-based employee compensation.. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Stock Compensation.“Stock Compensation.” Compensation expense is recognized on a graded method under the 2006 Plan and on a straight-line basis under the 2009 Plan over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value of the options.options and restricted stock awards. Under the 2006 Plan, the Company historically used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of its stock based payment awards, but beginning October 28, 2009 under its 2009 Plan itthe Company began using an enhanced Hull-White Trinomial model. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payments utilizing the Black-Scholes

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

model and the Enhancedenhanced Hull-White Trinomial model is affected by Holdings’ stock price and a number of assumptions, including expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected term, expected dividends yield, expected forfeiture rate, expected turn-over rate and the expected exercise multiple. Equity grants may no longer be granted under the 2006 Plan.

Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

NetDiluted net income (loss) per common share, calculated on the treasury stock method, is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. The Company’s outstanding securities that may potentially dilute the common stock are stock options and restricted stock awards.

Included in the Company’s calculation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 20132016 were 647approximately 405,000 stock options outstanding, of which noneapproximately 30,000 were out-of-the money and 96dilutive. In addition, there were approximately 103,000 restricted stock awards with 44 included inoutstanding, of which approximately 27,000 were dilutive for the weighted diluted shares outstanding for 2013.year ended December 31, 2016.

Included in the Company’s calculation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 20122015 were 596approximately 650,000 stock options outstanding, of which 501approximately 40,000 were out-of-the money and therefore anti-dilutive and 57out-of-the-money. In addition, there were approximately 89,000 restricted stock awards with 12 included in the weighted diluted shares outstanding, of which approximately 6,000 were dilutive for 2012.

For the year ended December 31, 20112015.

Included in the Company had 10 dilutive shares but it reported a net loss and any potentially dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive, therefore, no additional shares were considered in theCompany’s calculation of diluted earnings per share.share for the year ended December 31, 2014 were approximately 684,000 stock options outstanding, of which approximately 146,000 were out-of-the money. In addition, there were approximately 80,000 restricted stock awards outstanding, of which approximately 44,000 were dilutive for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Estimates

The financial statements are prepared by management in conformity with GAAPU.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and include estimated amounts and certain disclosures based on assumptions about future events. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, payables and debt. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

expenses approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt with variable interest rates approximates fair value based on instruments with similar terms.

The Company applies fair value techniques on a non-recurring basis associated with valuing potential impairment losses related to goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets and also when determining the fair value of contingent considerations. To determine the fair value in these situations, the Company uses Level 3 inputs, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists; therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions, such as discounted cash flows, or if available, what a market participant would pay on the measurement date.

The Company utilizes the income approach to estimate the fair value of its intangible assets derived from acquisitions. At the date of acquisition, a contingent earn-out obligation is recorded at its fair value, which is calculated as the present value of the Company’s maximum obligation based on probability-weighted estimates of achievement of performance targets defined in the earn-out agreements. The Company reviews the fair valuation periodically and adjusts the fair value for any changes in the maximum earn-out obligation based on probability-weighted estimates of achievement of certain performance targets defined in the earn-out agreements. In addition, discounted cash flows arewere used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s investment in joint ventures.

Going Concern

In connection with the preparation of the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company conducted an evaluation as to whether there were conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, which raised substantial doubt as to the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date of the issuance, or the date of availability, of the financial statements to be issued, noting that there did not appear to be evidence of substantial doubt of the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP and will be effective for the Company as of January 1, 2018. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or modified retrospective (cumulative effect) transition method and we have not yet selected which transition method we will apply. The Company’s evaluation of ASU 2014-09 is not complete. The FASB has issued and may issue in the future, interpretative guidance, which may cause the Company’s evaluation to change. The Company has completed an initial review to determine the impact ASU 2014-09 and its subsequent updates through December 31, 2016 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements or financial statement disclosures upon adoption. Based on the Company’s preliminary review, it believes that the timing and measurement of revenue for its customers will be similar to its current revenue recognition. However, this view is preliminary and could change based on the detailed analysis associated with the conversion and implementation phases of the Company’s ASU 2014-09 project. The Company will complete its assessment during 2017.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,“Leases” which replaces existing leasing rules with a comprehensive lease measurement and recognition standard and expanded disclosure requirements. ASU 2016-02 will require lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets as liabilities, with corresponding “right-

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements—(Continued)

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

 

New Accounting Pronouncements

of-use” assets and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, subject to early adoption. For income statement recognition purposes, leases will be classified as either a finance or an operating lease. The Company does not believe any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standardswill be required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. Upon initial evaluation, the Company believes that the new standard will have a material effectimpact on our Consolidated Balance Sheets but it will not affect our liquidity. The Company’s continuing to evaluate other potential impacts to its financial statements and accounting systems including whether the Company will need to secure new software to account for the change in leases.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.” ASU 2016-09 allows for simplification of several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the Company’s consolidatedstatement of cash flows. Under ASU 2016-09, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (including tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards) should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. ASU 2016-09 also requires recognition of excess tax benefits regardless of whether the benefit reduces taxes payable in the current period. ASU 2016-09 further permits the withholding of an amount up to employees’ maximum individual tax rate in the relevant jurisdiction without resulting in a liability classification. ASU 2016-09 also requires any excess tax benefits be classified along with other income tax cash flows as an operating activity and cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes to be classified as a financing activity. ASU 2016-09 is effective for public companies for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-09 on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments (Topic 326) Credit Losses.” ASU 2016-13 changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments. Under the new standard, entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income are to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. An allowance for credit losses will be a valuation account that will be deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. ASU 2016-13 is effective as of January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-13.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” This standard amends and adjusts how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years and will require adoption on a retrospective basis unless impracticable. If impracticable the Company would be required to apply the amendments prospectively as of the earliest date possible. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-15 will have on its statement of financial position resultsor financial statement disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The new guidance eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of operations, or cash flows.goodwill (i.e., Step 2 of the current goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge.

Instead, entities will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value (i.e., measure the charge based on the current Step 1). ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual and

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

any interim impairment tests for periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2017-04 to determine how its goodwill impairment testing will be impacted and whether it may elect to adopt ASU 2017-04 prior to the stated effective date.

Reclassification of Prior Period Balances

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current-year presentation. On a retrospective basis, the Company early adopted ASU 2015-17,“Balance Sheet Classificationof Deferred Taxes,” which requires an entity to classify deferred tax assets and liabilities as non-current on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Previously, deferred tax assets and liabilities were separated into current and non-current amounts on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2. Discontinued Operations

During December 2012, in anticipation ofEffective March 1, 2013, the sale ofCompany sold substantially all of the assets used in its home health business (the “Home Health Business”), the Company reported the operating results of the Home Health Business as discontinued operations in accordance with ASC 360-10-45, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” On February 7, 2013, the Company entered into the Home Health Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which subsidiaries of LHC Group, Inc. agreed to acquire substantially all the assets of the Home Health Business in Arkansas, Nevada and South Carolina, and 90% of the Home Health Business in California and Illinois, with the Company retaining 10% ownership in such locations,to subsidiaries of LHC Group, Inc. (the “Purchasers”) for a cash consideration of $20,000.$20.0 million. The transaction was consummated effective March 1, 2013.Company retained a 10% ownership interest in the Home Health Business in California and Illinois. On December 30, 2013, the Company sold one home health agency in Pennsylvania for approximately $0.2 million. In addition,accordance with ASC 360-10-45, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the results of the Home Health Business and the Pennsylvania home health agency sold are reflected as discontinued operations for an agency in Pennsylvania that was sold on December 30, 2013 and an agency in Idaho that was closed on November 30, 2012 are included in discontinued operations.all periods presented herein.

The Company has included the financial results of the Home Health Business in discontinued operations for all periods presented. Assets soldAs a condition of the sale of the Home Health Business to subsidiaries of LHC Group. Inc. (“LHCG”), the Company is responsible for any adjustments to Medicare and Medicaid billings prior to the purchasers are presented as assets held for sale, net, onclosing of the accompanying consolidated balance sheet assale. In connection with an internal evaluation of the Company’s billing processes, it discovered documentation errors in a number of claims that it had submitted to Medicare. Consistent with applicable law, the Company voluntarily remitted $1.8 million to the government in March 2014. As of December 31, 2012. In connection with2016, the Company, using its best judgment, has estimated a total of $0.4 million for billing adjustments for 2013, 2012 and 2011 which may be subject to Medicare audits. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company reduced the indemnification reserve accrual by the amounts accrued for periods no longer subject to Medicare audits of $0.2 million, $0.4 million and $0.5 million respectively. This amount is reflected as a reduction in general and administrative expense of discontinued operations presentation, certain financial statement footnotes have also been updated to reflectand reflected in the impact of discontinued operations.table below.

The following table presents the net service revenues and earnings attributable to discontinued operations, which include the financial results for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011:2014:

 

   2013  2012  2011 

Net service revenues

  $6,462   $38,822   $42,995  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes

   (1,672  (2,752  (17,122

Income tax benefit

   (692  (1,099  (6,729
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) from discontinued operations

  $(980 $(1,653 $(10,393
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The following table presents the net gain on the sale of the Home Health Business:

Gain before income taxes

  $15,284  

Income tax expense

   (6,322
  

 

 

 

Gain on sale of Home Health Business, net of tax

   8,962  
  

 

 

 

The only class of assets for discontinued operations reflected as assets held for sale, net, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

   2013   2012 

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization

  $—      $245  

   2016   2015   2014 
   (Amounts in Thousands) 

Net service revenues

  $—     $—     $—   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

   163    448    470 

Income tax expense

   66    178    190 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income from discontinued operations

   97    270    280 

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements—(Continued)

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

 

Pursuant3. Acquisitions

Effective February 23, 2016, the Company acquired certain assets of Lutheran Social Services of Illinois (“LSSI”) for approximately $0.1 million, in order to expand its adult day services business within the State of Illinois. The results of operations from the acquisition of LSSI is included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income from the date of the acquisition. The LSSI acquisition accounted for $1.0 million of net service revenues from continuing operations and $0.1 million of net income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.

On April 24, 2015, Addus HealthCare entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Margaret Coffey and Carol Kolar (the “South Shore Sellers”), South Shore Home Health Purchase Agreement,Service Inc. (“South Shore”) and Acaring Home Care, LLC (“Acaring”), pursuant to which Addus HealthCare agreed to acquire all of the Company has retained $625issued and $7,123outstanding securities of accounts receivable, net aseach of December 31, 2013South Shore and 2012. In addition, the Company retained the related accrued expenses and accounts payable associated with the Home Health Business as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

3. Sale of Agency

DuringAcaring. On February 2012, the Company5, 2016, Addus HealthCare completed its saleacquisition of all the outstanding securities of South Shore and Acaring for a home health agency locatedtotal purchase price of $20.0 million (the “South Shore Purchase Price”). The related acquisition costs, included in Portland, Oregon for approximately $525 with net proceeds of approximately $495 after the payment of closing related expenses. The Company recorded a $495 pre-tax gaingeneral and administrative expenses on the saleConsolidated Statements of the agency as part of continuing operations.

4. Acquisitions

The Company entered into two definitive acquisition agreements to acquire home and community based businesses during 2013 to further its presence in both existing states and to expand into new states. On October 17, 2013 the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire the entire home and community based business of Medi Home Private Care Division of Medical Services of America, Inc.. The acquisition included two agencies located in South Carolina whichIncome, were closed effective November 1, 2013; four agencies located in Tennessee and two agencies located in Ohio which closed in January 2014. The Company also entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire the assets of Coordinated Home Health Care, LLC a personal care business located in New Mexico on November 7, 2013. The combined purchase price for these two acquisitions was $12.3$1.3 million at the close and a maximum of $2.3 million in future cash based on certain performance. The purchase included sixteen offices located in Southern New Mexico. The transaction closed effective December 1, 2013. The related acquisitions costs were $660 for the Medi Home Private Care Division of Medical Services of America, Inc. and Coordinated Home Health Care, LLC deals, and were expensed as incurred. The results of operations from these acquired entitiesSouth Shore and Acaring are included in our statementthe Company’s Consolidated Statements of operationsIncome from the datesdate of the respective acquisitions.acquisition. Acaring was dissolved on March 1, 2016, and its assets were transferred to South Shore.

The Company’s acquisition of the assets of Coordinated Home Health Care, LLCSouth Shore and Acaring has been accounted for in accordance with ASC TopTopic 805,Business Combinations”Combinations, and the resultantresulting goodwill and other intangible assets will bewas accounted for under ASC Topic 350 “Goodwill Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”Assets. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values as of December 1, 2013. The total purchase price is $12,825 and is comprised of:

   Total 

Cash

  $11,725  

Contingent earn-out obligation (net of discount of $1,125)

   1,100  
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price

  $12,825  
  

 

 

 

The contingent earn-out obligation has beenacquisition was recorded at its fair value as of $1,100, which is the present value of the Company’s obligation to up to $2,250 based on probability-weighted estimates of the achievement of certain performance targets, as defined.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

February 5, 2016. Under business combination accounting, the total purchase price will beSouth Shore Purchase Price was $20.0 million and was allocated to Coordinated Home Health Care, LLC’sSouth Shore’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values. Based upon our management’s valuation, the total purchase price has been allocated as follows:

 

  Total   Total
(Amounts in
Thousands)
 

Goodwill

  $9,488    $5,265 

Identifiable intangible assets

   3,300     9,957 

Accounts receivable

   888     6,807 

Prepaid expenses

   35  

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

   58  

Deposits

   15  

Other current assets

   858 

Accrued liabilities

   (1,593

Accounts payable

   (81   (1,268

Accrued liabilities

   (864

Other liabilities

   (14
  

 

   

 

 

Total purchase price allocation

  $12,825    $20,026 
  

 

   

 

 

Management’s assessment of qualitative factors affecting goodwill for South Shore includes: estimates of market share at the date of purchase; ability to grow in the market; synergy with existing Company operations and the presence of managed care payors in the market.

Identifiable intangible assets acquired consist of trade names and trademarks, customer relationships and non-compete agreements. The estimated fair value of identifiable intangible assets was determined by ourthe Company’s management. It is anticipated that the net intangible and identifiable intangible assets, including goodwill, are deductible for tax purposes.

Acquisitions completed in 2013 accounted for $1,692 of net service revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2013.

5. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

   December 31, 
   2013  2012 

Computer equipment

  $2,110   $1,705  

Furniture and equipment

   1,099    918  

Transportation equipment

   588    508  

Leasehold improvements

   1,628    1,496  

Computer software

   3,749    3,179  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   9,174    7,806  

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (6,540  (5,317
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $2,634   $2,489  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Computer software includes $1,500 of internally developed software that was recognized in conjunction with the acquisition of Addus HealthCare. Depreciation and amortization expense predominantly related to computer equipment and software is reflected in general and administrative expenses and totaled $814, $870 and $941 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The South Shore acquisition accounted for $51.7 million of net service revenues from continuing operations and $0.8 million net loss of net income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Effective November 9, 2015, the Company acquired certain assets of Five Points Healthcare of Virginia, LLC (“Five Points”), in order to further expand the Company’s presence in the State of Virginia. The total consideration for the transaction was comprised of $4.1 million in cash. The related acquisition costs, included in general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income, were $0.4 million and were expensed as incurred. The results of operations from this acquired entity are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income from the date of the acquisition.

The Company’s acquisition of Five Points has been accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations,” and the resulting goodwill and other intangible assets was accounted for under ASC Topic 350 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The acquisition of Five Points was recorded at its fair value as of November 9, 2015. The total purchase price was $4.1 million. Under business combination accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to Five Points’ net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values. Based upon management’s valuation, the total purchase price has been allocated as follows:

   Total
(Amounts in
Thousands)
 

Goodwill

  $2,885 

Identifiable intangible assets

   920 

Accounts receivable

   472 

Accrued liabilities

   (155)

Accounts payable

   (7)
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price allocation

  $4,115 
  

 

 

 

Management’s assessment of qualitative factors affecting goodwill for Five Points includes: estimates of market share at the date of purchase; ability to grow in the market; synergy with existing Company operations and the presence of managed care payors in the market.

Identifiable intangible assets acquired consist of trade names and trademarks, customer relationships and non-compete agreements. The estimated fair value of identifiable intangible assets was determined by the Company’s management. The net intangible and identifiable intangible assets, including goodwill, are deductible for tax purposes.

The Five Points acquisition accounted for $4.1 million of net service revenues from continuing operations and $0.0 million of net income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 and $0.7 million of net service revenues from continuing operations and $0.0 million net loss of net income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Effective January 1, 2015, the Company acquired Priority Home Health Care, Inc. (“PHHC”), in order to further expand the Company’s presence in the State of Ohio. The total consideration for the transaction was comprised of $4.3 million in cash. The related acquisition costs, included in general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income, were $0.5 million and were expensed as incurred. The results of operations from this acquired entity are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income from the date of the acquisition.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

 

6.The Company’s acquisition of PHHC has been accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations,” and the resultant goodwill and other intangible assets will be accounted for under ASC Topic 350 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The acquisition was recorded at its fair value as of January 1, 2015. The total purchase price is $4.3 million. Under business combination accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to PHHC’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values. Based upon management’s valuation, the total purchase price has been allocated as follows:

   Total
(Amounts in
Thousands)
 

Goodwill

  $1,862 

Identifiable intangible assets

   1,930 

Accounts receivable

   951 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

   58 

Other current assets

   8 

Accrued liabilities

   (339)

Accounts payable

   (220)
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price allocation

  $4,250 
  

 

 

 

Management’s assessment of qualitative factors affecting goodwill for PHHC includes: estimates of market share at the date of purchase; ability to grow in the market; synergy with existing Company operations and the presence of managed care payors in the market.

Identifiable intangible assets acquired consist of trade names and trademarks, customer relationships and non-compete agreements. The estimated fair value of identifiable intangible assets was determined by the Company’s management. It is anticipated that the net intangible and identifiable intangible assets, including goodwill, are deductible for tax purposes.

The PHHC acquisition accounted for $7.5 million of net service revenues from continuing operations and $0.3 million of net income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 and $9.0 million of net service revenues from continuing operations and $0.1 million of net income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Effective June 1, 2014, the Company acquired Cura Partners, LLC, which conducts business under the name Aid & Assist at Home, LLC (“Aid & Assist”), in order to further expand the Company’s presence in the State of Tennessee. The total consideration for the transaction was $8.2 million, comprised of $7.1 million in cash and $1.0 million, representing the estimated fair value of contingent earn-out obligation. The related acquisition costs, included in general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income, were $0.6 million and were expensed as incurred. The results of operations from this acquired entity are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income from the date of the acquisition.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The Company’s acquisition of Aid & Assist has been accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations,” and the resultant goodwill and other intangible assets will be accounted for under ASC Topic 350 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The acquisition was recorded at its fair value as of June 1, 2014. The total purchase price is $8.2 million and is comprised of:

   Total
(Amounts in
Thousands)
 

Cash

  $7,172 

Contingent earn-out obligation

   1,020 
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price

  $8,192 
  

 

 

 

As of June 1, 2014, the contingent earn-out obligation was recorded at its fair value of $1.0 million, which was the present value of the Company’s obligation to pay up to $1.2 million based on probability-weighted estimates of the achievement of certain performance targets, as defined in the earn-out agreement between the parties. As of December 31, 2014, the Company revalued this liability at $0.2 million. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, based on its valuations, the Company believes a liability does not exist for this contingent earn-out obligation. These declines in the fair value of the contingent earn-out obligation reflects the acquisition’s failure to achieve performance targets expected at the date of acquisition for 2014, 2015 and 2016. The contingentearn-out obligation expired December 31, 2016.

Under business combination accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to Aid & Assist’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values. Based upon management’s valuation, the total purchase price has been allocated as follows:

   Total
(Amounts in
Thousands)
 

Goodwill

  $4,317 

Identifiable intangible assets

   3,950 

Accounts receivable

   521 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

   65 

Other current assets

   60 

Accrued liabilities

   (553)

Accounts payable

   (168)
  

 

 

 

Total purchase price allocation

  $8,192 
  

 

 

 

Management’s assessment of qualitative factors affecting goodwill for Aid & Assist includes: estimates of market share at the date of purchase; ability to grow in the market; synergy with existing Company operations and the presence of managed care payors in the market.

Identifiable intangible assets acquired consist of trade names and trademarks, customer relationships and non-compete agreements. The estimated fair value of identifiable intangible assets was determined by the Company’s management. The net intangible and identifiable intangible assets, including goodwill, are deductible for tax purposes.

The Aid and Assist acquisition accounted for $8.8 million of net service revenues from continuing operations and $0.3 million net loss of net income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31,

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

2016, $10.7 million of net service revenues from continuing operations and $0.1 million net loss of net income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 and $7.5 million of net service revenues from continuing operations and $0.2 million of net income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2014.

The following table contains unaudited pro forma consolidated income statement information assuming the South Shore acquisition closed on January 1, 2015, the Five Points and PHHC acquisitions closed on January 1, 2014, and Aid and Assist acquisition closed on January 1, 2013.

   For the Years Ended December 31,
(Amounts in Thousands)
 
   2016   2015   2014 

Net service revenues

  $405,524   $392,887   $334,517 

Operating income from continuing operations

   14,437    20,383    19,458 

Net income from continuing operations

   11,409    14,135    12,893 

Earnings from discontinued operations

   97    270    280 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $11,506   $14,405   $13,173 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income per common share

      

Basic income per share

      

Continuing operations

  $1.01   $1.29   $1.18 

Discontinued operations

   0.01    0.02    0.03 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic income per share

  $1.02   $1.31   $1.21 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted income per share

      

Continuing operations

  $1.00   $1.27   $1.16 

Discontinued operations

   0.01    0.02    0.03 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted income per share

  $1.01   $1.29   $1.19 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The pro forma disclosures in the table above include adjustments for, amortization of intangible assets and tax expense and acquisition costs to reflect results that are more representative of the combined results of the transactions as if the South Shore acquisition had closed on January 1, 2015, the Five Points and PHHC acquisitions closed on January 1, 2014, and the Aid and Assist acquisition closed on January 1, 2013. This pro forma information is presented for illustrative purposes only and may not be indicative of the results of operation that would have actually occurred. In addition, future results may vary significantly from the results reflected in the pro forma information. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not reflect the impact of future events that may occur after the acquisition, such as anticipated cost savings from operating synergies.

For the acquisition of Coordinated Home Health Care, LLC on December 1, 2013, a contingent earn-out obligation was recorded at its fair value of $1.1 million, which was the present value of the Company’s obligation to pay up to $2.3 million based on probability-weighted estimates of the achievement of certain performance targets, as defined in the earn-out agreement between the parties. As of December 31, 2014, the Company revalued this liability at $1.9 million. This increase in the fair value of the contingent earn-out obligation reflected the acquisition’s excess achievement of performance targets for the year ended December 31, 2014 as a result of higher than anticipated rate of conversion to managed care organizations in the State of New Mexico. $1.0 million of the liability, which was recorded as the current portion at December 31, 2014, was subsequently paid during the second quarter of 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the remaining contingent earn-out obligation was recorded at its fair value of $1.3 million which is the maximum earn-out obligation based on

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

probability-weighted estimates of the achievement of certain performance targets, as defined in the earn-out agreement between the parties. The obligation was paid during the second quarter of 2016. The contingentearn-out obligation expired December 31, 2015.

4. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

   December 31, 
   2016   2015 
   (Amounts in Thousands) 

Computer equipment

  $3,807   $3,499 

Furniture and equipment

   3,146    2,498 

Transportation equipment

   898    773 

Leasehold improvements

   3,551    4,756 

Computer software

   5,419    6,245 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   16,821    17,771 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (10,173   (9,152
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $6,648   $8,619 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Computer software includes $2.9 million of internally developed software. The Company had disposals of property and equipment related to the closure of three adult day services centers in Illinois during the third quarter of 2016 and unused contact center office space. Depreciation and amortization expense predominantly related to computer equipment and software and leasehold improvements totaled $1.7 million, $1.7 million and $1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The Company’s carrying value of goodwill is the residual of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired from various acquisitions including the acquisition of Addus HealthCare. In accordance with ASC Topic 350, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized. The Company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis, as of October 1, or whenever potential impairment triggers occur, such as a significant change in business climate or regulatory changes that would indicate that an impairment may have occurred.

Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at least annually. The Company can elect to perform Step-0Step 0 an optional qualitative analysis and based on the results skip the remaining two steps. In 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, the Company elected to implement Step 0 and was not required to conduct the remaining two step analysis. In performing its goodwill assessment for 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, the Company evaluated the following factors that affect future business performance: macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, overall financial performance, entity-specific events, reporting unit factors and company stock price. As a result of the assessment of these qualitative factors, the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not that the fair values of the reporting unit goodwill as of December 31, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 exceed the carrying values of the unit. Accordingly, the first and second steps of the goodwill impairment test as described in FASB ASC 350-20-35, which includes estimating the fair values of the Company, are not considered necessarynecessary. The Company did not record any impairment charges for the Company.

In 2011,years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, or 2014. The goodwill for the Company elected to evaluate the goodwill via the two step methodology. The first step in the evaluation of goodwill impairment involves comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit to the recorded value, including goodwill. We used the combination of a discounted cash flow model (“DCF model”)Company’s continuing operations was $73.9 million and the market multiple analysis method to determine the current fair value of each reporting unit. The DCF model was prepared using revenue and expense projections based on our current operating plan. As such, a number of significant assumptions and estimates are involved in the application of the DCF model to forecast revenue growth, price changes, gross profits, operating expenses and operating cash flows. The cash flows were discounted using a weighted average cost of capital of 14.5%, which was management’s best estimate based on our capital structure and external industry data. As part of the second step of this evaluation, if the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss would be recognized.

In light of the then Federal and state economic and reimbursement environments and state budgetary pressures to decrease or eliminate services provided by us, we completed a preliminary assessment of the fair value of our two reporting units, home & community (continuing operations) and home health (discontinued operations), and the potential for goodwill impairment$68.8 million as of June 30, 2011. Our total stockholders’ equity as of September 30, 2011 was significantly greater than our market capitalization, which was approximately $43.6 million based on 10,774,886 shares of common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2011. While the market capitalization of approximately $43.6 million was below our stockholders’ equity, the market capitalization metric is only one indicator of fair value. In our opinion, the market capitalization approach, by itself, is not a reliable indicator of the value for our company.

During 2011, based on the aboveDecember 31, 2016 and updates to the Company’s business projections and forecasts, and other factors, the Company determined that the estimated fair value of its discontinued operations was less than the net book value indicating that its allocated goodwill was impaired. The preliminary assessment for the continuing operations indicated that its fair value was greater than its net book value with no initial indication of goodwill impairment.

As permitted by ASC Topic 350, when an impairment indicator arises toward the end of an interim reporting period, the Company may recognize its best estimate of that impairment loss. Based on the Company’s

2015, respectively.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements—(Continued)

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

 

preliminary analysis prepared as of June 30, 2011, the Company determined that all of the $13,076 allocated to goodwill for the discontinued operations as of September 30, 2011 was impaired and recorded a goodwill impairment loss in the third quarter of 2011.

The goodwill for the Company’s continuing operations was $60,026 and $50,536 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

SummaryA summary of goodwill and related adjustments for continuing operations is provided below:

 

   Continuing
operations
  Discontinued
operations
   Total 

Goodwill, at December 31, 2011

  $50,695   $—      $50,695  

Adjustments to previously recorded goodwill

   (159  —       (159
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Goodwill, at December 31, 2012

  $50,536   $—      $50,536  

Additions for Acquisitions

   9,650    —       9,650  

Adjustments to previously recorded goodwill

   (160  —       (160
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Goodwill, at December 31, 2013

  $60,026   $—      $60,026  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Goodwill
(Amounts in
Thousands)
 

Goodwill, at December 31, 2014

  $64,220 

Additions for acquisitions

   4,747 

Adjustments to previously recorded goodwill

   (123
  

 

 

 

Goodwill, at December 31, 2015

  $68,844 

Additions for acquisitions

   5,265 

Adjustments to previously recorded goodwill

   (203
  

 

 

 

Goodwill, at December 31, 2016

  $73,906 
  

 

 

 

Adjustments to the previously recorded goodwill are primarily credits related to amortization of tax goodwill in excess of book basis.

The Company’s identifiable intangible assets consist of customer and referral relationships, trade names, trademarks, state licenses and non-compete agreements. Amortization is computed using straight-line and accelerated methods based upon the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, which range from two to 25twenty-five years.

The Company also has indefinite-lived intangible assets that are not subject to amortization expense such as licenses and in certain states certificates of need and licenses to conduct specific operations within geographic markets. The Company has concluded that certificates of need and licensesthese assets have indefinite lives, as management has determined that there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, economic or other factors that would limit the useful life of these intangible assets and the Company intends to renew the licenses indefinitely. The licenses and operate the certificates of need and licenses indefinitely. The certificates of need and licenses are tested annually for impairment using the cost approach. Under this method assumptions are made about the cost to replace the certificates of need. No impairment charges were recorded in the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 or 2011.2014.

The carrying amount and accumulated amortization of each identifiable intangible asset category consisted of the following for continuing and discontinued operations at December 31, 20132016 and 2012:2015:

 

   Customer and
referral
relationships
  Trade names
and
trademarks
  State
Licenses
   Non-competition
agreements
  Total 

Gross balance at December 31, 2012

  $24,908   $4,081   $150    $408   $29,547  

Accumulated amortization

   (20,041  (2,778  —       (358  (23,117
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Balance at December 31, 2012

   4,867    1,303    150     50    6,370  

Additions for acquisitions

   1,438    1,200    —       1,100    3,738  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross balance at December 31, 2013

   26,346    5,281    150     1,508    33,285  

Accumulated amortization

   (21,138  (2,995  —       (390  (24,523
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Balance at December 31, 2013

  $5,208   $2,286   $150    $1,118   $8,762  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Customer
and referral
relationships
  Trade
names and
trademarks
  State
Licenses
   Non-competition
agreements
  Total 
   (Amounts in Thousands) 

Gross balance at January 1, 2015

  $27,896   7,181   150    2,058   37,285 

Acquisition of customer list

   146   —     —      —     146 

Additions for acquisitions

   1,830   980   —      40   2,850 

Accumulated amortization

   (24,055  (4,587  —      (1,288  (29,930
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Balance at December 31, 2015

   5,817   3,574   150    810   10,351 

Gross balance at January 1, 2016

   29,872   8,161   150    2,098   40,281 

Additions for acquisitions

   4,800   5,100   —      57   9,957 

Accumulated amortization

   (26,766  (6,296  —      (1,763  (34,825
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Balance at December 31, 2016

  $7,906  $6,965  $150   $392  $15,413 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements—(Continued)

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

 

Amortization expense for continuing and discontinued operations related to the identifiable intangible assets amounted to $1,346, $1,674,$4.9 million, $3.0 million and $2,613$2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. Goodwill and state licenses are not amortized pursuant to ASC Topic 350.

The weighted average remaining lives of identifiable intangible assets as of December 31, 2016 is 6.1 years.

The estimated future intangible amortization expense is as follows:

 

For the year ended December 31,

    Total
(Amount in
Thousands)
 

2014

  $1,988  

2015

   1,781  

2016

   1,611  

2017

   1,122    $4,185 

2018

   999     3,835 

2019

   2,698 

2020

   1,593 

2021

   1,418 

Thereafter

   1,111     1,684 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $8,612    $15,413 
  

 

   

 

 

7.6. Details of Certain Balance Sheet Accounts

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:

 

  December 31, 
  December 31,   2016   2015 
  2013   2012   (Amounts in Thousands) 

Prepaid health insurance

  $3,192    $4,062    $2,238   $490 

Prepaid workers’ compensation and liability insurance

   1,173     1,056     1,190    1,526 

Prepaid rent

   455     181     568    578 

Workers’ compensation insurance receivable

   821     953     747    1,303 

Other

   594     1,041     1,255    961 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
  $6,235    $7,293    $5,998   $4,858 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Accrued expenses consisted of the following:

 

   December 31, 
   2013   2012 

Accrued payroll

  $12,932    $11,539  

Accrued workers’ compensation insurance

   13,347     12,452  

Accrued health insurance

   3,731     3,469  

Indemnification reserve (1)

   3,224     —    

Accrued payroll taxes

   1,755     1,481  

Accrued professional fees

   1,319     477  

Amounts due to LHCG (2)

   2,196     —    

Accrued taxes

   113     1,223  

Accrued interest

   —       51  

Current portion of contingent earn-out obligation (3) (4)

   1,100     689  

Other

   2,228     1,813  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $41,945    $32,717  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   December 31, 
   2016   2015 
   (Amounts in Thousands) 

Accrued payroll

  $17,509   $13,304 

Accrued workers’ compensation insurance

   12,823    14,116 

Accrued health insurance (1)

   4,092    950 

Indemnification reserve (2)

   419    754 

Accrued payroll taxes

   1,747    1,805 

Accrued professional fees

   1,485    1,084 

Accrued severance (3)

   1,326    —   

Accrued restructuring (4)

   1,786    —   

Other

   1,416    3,069 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $42,603   $35,082 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements—(Continued)

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

 

 

(1)The Company provides health insurance coverage to qualified union employees providing personal care services in Illinois through a Taft-Hartley multi-employer health and welfare plan under Section 302(c)(5) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947. The Company’s insurance contributions equal the amount reimbursed by the State of Illinois. Contributions are due within five business days from the date the funds are received from the State. Amounts due of $2.2 million and $0.5 million for health insurance reimbursements and contributions were reflected in prepaid insurance and accrued insurance at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

(2)As a condition of the sale of the Home Health Business to subsidiaries of LHC Group. Inc. (“LHCG”) the Company is responsible for any adjustments to Medicare and Medicaid billings during our ownership.prior to the closing of the sale. In connection with an internal evaluation of the Company’s billing processes, it discovered documentation errors in a number of claims that it had submitted to Medicare. Consistent with applicable law, the Company voluntarily remitted $1.8 million to the government in March 2014. The Company, using its best judgment, has estimated a total of $3,244$0.4 million for billing adjustments. Consistent with applicable law,adjustments for 2013, 2012 and 2011 services which may be subject to Medicare audits. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company voluntarily remitted approximately $1,800reduced the indemnification reserve accrual by the amounts accrued for periods no longer subject to the governmentMedicare audits of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. This amount is reflected as a reduction in March 2014.

(2)Amounts due to LHCG pursuant to a billing services arrangement between the Companygeneral and LHCG.administrative expense of discontinued operations.

 

(3)The Company acquired certain assets of Advantage Health Systems, Inc. (“Advantage”) in July 2010. The purchase agreement for the acquisition of Advantage contained a provision for earn-out payments contingent upon the achievement of certain performance targets. The sellers of Advantage disagreedAccrued severance represents amounts payable to terminated employees with employment and/or separation agreements with the Company’s calculation of the earn-out payment and the parties agreed to have an arbitrator determine the amount of the second earn out payment. Based upon the arbitrator’s ruling the final earn out payment of $534 was made in October 2013.Company.

 

(4)The Company acquired certain assetsAccrued restructuring includes reserves for lease commitments related to the closure of Coordinated Home Health Care on December 1, 2013. The purchase agreement forthree adult day services centers in Illinois during the acquisition contained a provision for earn-out payments. The contingent earn-out obligation has been recorded at its fair valuethird quarter of $1,100, which is the present value of the Company’s obligation to up to $2,250 based on probability- weighted estimates of the achievement of certain performance targets.2016 and unused contact center office space.

The Company provides health insurance coverage to qualified union employees providing home and community based services in Illinois through a Taft-Hartley multi-employer health and welfare plan under Section 302(c)(5) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947. The Company’s insurance contributions equal the amount reimbursed by the State of Illinois. Contributions are due within five business days from the date the funds are received from the State. Amounts due of $3,163 and $3,405 for health insurance reimbursements and contributions were reflected in prepaid insurance and accrued insurance at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company’s workers’ compensation program has a $350$0.4 million deductible component. The Company recognizes its obligations associated with this program in the period the claim is incurred. The cost of both the claims reported and claims incurred but not reported, up to the deductible, have been accrued based on historical claims experience, industry statistics and an actuarial analysis performed by an independent third party. The future claims payments related to the workers’ compensation program are secured by letters of credit. These letters of credit totaled $12,411 and $7,710$16.7 million at December 31, 20132016 and 2012.2015.

As part of the terms of the acquisition of Addus HealthCare in 2006, all 2005 and prior workers’ compensation claims arewere the obligation of the former stockholders of Addus HealthCare. Approximately $1,039 in cash escrows and deposits were set-aside fromDuring the purchase pricefourth quarter of 2014, Addus HealthCare as collateralentered into an agreement pursuant to which the responsibility of the selling shareholders for these 2005 and prior claims as of December 31, 2013.was terminated. The outstanding loss reserves associated with the 2005 and prior workers’ compensation policies approximated $604$0.7 million and $0.8 million at December 31, 2013.

2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company received $0.8 million in cash and escrow amounts in exchange for the termination of these liabilities.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements—(Continued)

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

 

8.7. Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

 

  December 31,   December 31, 2016   December 31, 2015 
  2013   2012   (Amounts in Thousands) 

Revolving credit loan

  $—      $16,250    $—     $—   

Term loan

   —       208     24,063    —   

Capital leases

   2,433    2,991 

Less unamortized issuance costs

   (1,483   —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   —       16,458    $25,013   $2,991 

Less current maturities

   —       (208   (2,531   (1,109
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Long-term debt

  $—      $16,250    $22,482   $1,882 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” which amended the previous presentation of debt issuance costs in the financial statements. ASU 2015-03 requires an entity to present debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2016 and has classified the debt issuance costs as a reduction of long-term debt as of December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2015, debt issuance costs are included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as the Company had no long-term debt outstanding during the year to offset the debt issuance costs.

Capital Leases

On July 12, 2014, September 11, 2014 and April 13, 2015, the Company executed three 48-month capital lease agreements for $2.7 million, $1.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, with First American Commercial Bancorp, Inc. The capital leases were entered into to finance property and equipment at the Company’s corporate headquarters in Downers Grove, IL. The underlying assets are included in “Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. These capital lease obligations require monthly payments through September 2019 and have implicit interest rates that range from 3.0% to 3.6%. At the end of the term, the Company has the option to purchase the assets for $1 per lease agreement.

Effective October 1, 2016, the Company entered into a 25-month capital lease agreement for $0.6 million with Meridian Leasing Corporation. The capital leases were entered into to finance property and equipment for the Company’s telephone systems. The underlying assets are included in “Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. These capital lease obligations require monthly payments through October 2018 and have an implicit interest rate of 11.1%. At the end of the term, the Company has the option to purchase the assets for $1 per lease agreement.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

An analysis of the leased property under capital leases by major classes is as follows.

Classes of Property

  Asset Balances at
December 31, 2016
(Amounts in  Thousands)
 

Leasehold Improvements

  $2,928 

Furniture & Equipment

   1,144 

Computer Equipment

   635 

Computer Software

   303 
  

 

 

 

Total

   5,010 
  

 

 

 

Less: Accumulated Depreciation

   2,556 
  

 

 

 
  $2,454 
  

 

 

 

The future minimum payments for capital leases as of December 31, 2016 are as follows:

   Capital Lease
(Amounts In Thousands)
 

2017

  $ 1,561 

2018

   1,026 

2019

   30 
  

 

 

 

Total minimum lease payments

   2,617 

Less: amount representing estimated executory costs (such as taxes, maintenance and insurance), including profit thereon, included in total minimum lease payments

   (70
  

 

 

 

Net minimum lease payments

   2,547 

Less: amount representing interest (1)

   (114
  

 

 

 

Present value of net minimum lease payments (2)

  $2,433 
  

 

 

 

(1)Amount necessary to reduce net minimum lease payments to present value calculated at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at lease inception.

(2)Included in the balance sheet as $1.4 million of the current portion of long-term debt and $1.0 million of the long-term debt, less current portion.

Senior Secured Credit Facility

On May 24, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment to its credit facility with certain lenders and Fifth Third Bank, as agent and letters of credit issuer. The Company’s amended credit facility provides a $55,000$100.0 million revolving line of credit, a delayed draw term loan facility of up to $25.0 million and an uncommitted incremental term loan facility of up to $50.0 million, expiring November 2, 201410, 2020 and includes a $15,000$35.0 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit. The amended credit facility increased the specified advance multiple from 3.25 to 3.75 to 1.00 and previously included a $5,000 term loan that matured and was paid on January 5, 2013.the maximum permitted senior leverage ratio from 3.50 to 4.00 to 1.00. Except as modified by the May 24, 2016 amendment, the amended credit facility contains the same material terms as the previous agreement dated November 10, 2015. Substantially all of the subsidiaries of Holdings are co-borrowers,

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

and Holdings has guaranteed the borrowers’ obligations under the credit facility. The credit facility is secured by a first priority security interest in all of Holdings’ and the borrowers’ current and future tangible and intangible assets, including the shares of stock of the borrowers.

The availability of funds under the revolving credit portion of the Company’s credit facility, as amended, is based on the lesser of (i) the product of adjustedAdjusted EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement, for the most recent 12-month period for which financial statements have been delivered under the credit facility agreement multiplied by the specified advance multiple, up to 3.25,3.75, less the outstanding senior indebtedness and letters of credit, and (ii) $55,000$100.0 million less the outstanding revolving loans and letters of credit. Interest on the revolving line of credit and term loan amounts outstanding under theour credit facility ismay be payable either at (x) the sum of (i) an applicable margin ranging from 2.00% to 2.50% based on the applicable leverage ratio plus (ii) a floatingbase rate equal to the 30-day LIBOR, plus an applicable margingreatest of 4.6% or(a) the LIBOR rate for term periods of one, two, three or six monthsinterest last quoted by The Wall Street Journal as the “prime rate,” (b) the sum of the federal funds rate plus a margin of 4.6%. Interest0.50% and (c) the sum of the adjusted LIBOR that would be applicable to a loan with an interest period of one month advanced on the credit facility is paid monthlyapplicable day plus a margin of 3.00% or (y) the sum of (i) an applicable margin ranging from 3.00% to 3.50% based on or at the end ofapplicable leverage ratio plus (ii) the relevantadjusted LIBOR that would be applicable to a loan with an interest period as determined in accordanceof one, two or three months advanced on the applicable day or (z) the sum of (i) an applicable margin ranging from 3.00% to 3.50% based on the applicable leverage ratio plus (ii) the daily floating LIBOR that would be applicable to a loan with an interest period of one month advanced on the credit facility agreement.applicable day. The Company pays a fee equalranging from 0.25% to 0.5%0.50% per annum ofbased on the applicable leverage ratio times the unused portion of the revolving portion of the credit facility. Issued stand-by letters of credit are charged at a rate equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR loans payable quarterly.

On January 12, 2016, May 5, 2016 and July 14, 2016, the Company drew $10.0 million, $10.0 million and $10.0 million, respectively, of 2.0% per annum payable monthly.its revolving credit line to fund growth and on-going operations. On February 5, 2016, the Company drew $22.0 million on its delayed draw term loan to fund the acquisition of South Shore. As a result of a provision in the Company’s amended credit facility, the Company was able to transfer $3.0 million of its revolving credit line debt to the Company’s term loan debt on May 24, 2016. During the month of August 2016, the Company fully repaid all outstanding amounts under the revolving portion of the credit facility. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had a total of $24.1 million outstanding on the credit facility and the total availability under the revolving credit loan facility was $79.7 million. The Company did not have any amounts outstanding on the credit facility as of December 31, 20132015 and the total availability under the revolving credit loan facility was $42,600.$58.3 million.

The credit facility contains customary affirmative covenants regarding, among other things, the maintenance of records, compliance with laws, maintenance of permits, maintenance of insurance and property and payment of taxes. The credit facility also contains certain customary financial covenants and negative covenants that, among other things, include a requirement to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a requirement to stay below a maximum senior leverage ratio and a requirement to stay below a maximum permitted amount of capital expenditures, as well as restrictions on guarantees, indebtedness, liens, dividends, distributions, investments and loans, subject to customary carve outs, a restriction on dividends (unless no default then exists or would occur as a result thereof, the Company is in pro forma compliance with the financial covenants contained in the credit facility after giving effect thereto, the Company has an excess availability of at least 40% of the revolving credit commitment under the credit facility and the aggregate amount of dividends and distributions paid in any fiscal year does not exceed $5.0 million), restrictions on the Company’s ability to enter into transactions other than in the ordinary course of business, a restriction on the ability to consummate more than three acquisitions in any calendar year, or for theconsummate any individual acquisition with a purchase price in excess of any one acquisition to exceed $500,$25.0 million and consummate acquisitions with total purchase price in excess of $40.0 million in the aggregate over the term of the credit facility, in each case without the consent of the lenders, restrictions on mergers,

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

transfers of assets, acquisitions, equipment, subsidiaries and affiliate transactions, subject to customary carve outs, and restrictions on fundamental changes and lines of business. The Company was in compliance with all of its credit facility covenants at December 31, 2013.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

During the second quarter of 2012, the lenders under the credit facility agreed to a modified interpretation of the credit facility as it relates to the calculation of the fixed charge ratio, which provides the Company with increased flexibility in meeting this covenant. In order to obtain consent from the lender for the sale of the Home Health Business the Company agreed to work in good faith to negotiate and enter into an amendment to the credit to amend certain provisions including a reduction in the maximum revolving loan limit and revolving loan commitment.

The Company has received a commitment letter to renew the credit facility for a period of five years on essentially the same terms as the expiring facility. If executed the term of the new facility will expire in November 2, 2019.

Subordinated Dividend Notes

On November 2, 2009, in conjunction with the IPO, all outstanding shares of Holdings’ series A preferred stock were converted into an aggregate 4,077 shares of common stock at a ratio of 1:108. Total accrued and unpaid dividends on the series A preferred stock were $13,109 as of November 2, 2009, at which time a dividend payment of $173 was made and the remaining $12,936 in unpaid preferred dividends were converted into dividend notes. The dividend notes are subordinated and junior to all obligations under the Company’s credit facility. On November 2, 2009, the Company made a mandatory payment of $4,000 on the dividend notes. Interest on the outstanding dividend notes accrues at a rate of 10% per annum, compounded annually. The outstanding principal amount of the dividend notes was originally payable in eight equal consecutive quarterly installments which commenced on December 31, 2009 and each March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year thereafter until paid in full. Interest on the unpaid principal balance of the dividend notes is due and payable quarterly in arrears together with each payment of principal.

On March 18, 2010, the Company amended its subordinated dividend notes. A balance of $7,819 was outstanding on the dividend notes as of December 31, 2009. Pursuant to the amendments, the dividend notes were amended to (i) extend the maturity date of the dividend notes from September 30, 2011 to December 31, 2012, (ii) modify the amortization schedule of the dividend notes to reduce the annual principal payment amounts from $4,468 to $1,250 in 2010; from $3,351 to $2,500 in 2011; and amended total payments in 2012 to $4,069, and (iii) permit, based on the Company’s leverage ratio, the prepayment of all or a portion of the principal amount of the dividend notes, together with interest on the principal amount. The Company repaid the subordinated dividend notes in the fourth quarter of 2012.

9.8. Income Taxes

The current and deferred federal and state income tax provision (benefit), for continuing operations, are comprised of the following:

 

   December 31, 
   2013   2012   2011 

Current

      

Federal

  $2,926    $3,745    $2,863  

State

   435     792     319  

Deferred

      

Federal

   393     196     688  

State

   58     74     374  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

  $3,812    $4,807    $4,244  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

   December 31, 
   2016   2015   2014 
   (Amounts in Thousands) 

Current

      

Federal

  $4,400   $2,743   $2,231 

State

   908    528    976 

Deferred

      

Federal

   (1,147   546    1,915 

State

   (167   115    306 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Provision for income taxes

  $3,994   $3,932   $5,428 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The tax effects of certain temporary differences between the Company’s book and tax bases of assets and liabilities give rise to significant portions of the deferred income tax assets at December 31, 20132016 and 2012.2015. The deferred tax assets consisted of the following:

 

  December 31, 
  December 31,   2016   2015(1) 
  2013 2012   (Amounts in Thousands) 

Deferred tax assets

       

Current

   

Long-term

    

Accounts receivable allowances

  $1,664   $1,784    $2,960   $1,930 

Accrued compensation

   849    1,133     2,733    1,165 

Accrued workers’ compensation

   5,365    4,593     4,854    5,092 

Transaction costs

   1,137    917 

Reserves

   169    300 

Restructuring costs

   718    —   

Stock-based compensation

   954    1,190 

Other

   923    395     524    926 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current deferred tax assets

   8,801    7,905  

Total long-term deferred tax assets

   14,049    11,520 

Deferred tax liabilities

       

Current

   

Prepaid insurance

   (475  (647
  

 

  

 

 

Net deferred tax assets—current

   8,326    7,258  

Deferred tax assets

   

Long-term

       

Goodwill and intangible assets

   —      1,577     (9,863   (8,346

Property and equipment

   52    96     (552   (697

Reserves

   1,295    —    

Stock-based compensation

   861    655  
  

 

  

 

 

Total long-term deferred tax assets

   2,208    2,328  

Deferred tax liability

   

Long-term

   

Goodwill and intangible assets

   (5,649  —    

Prepaid insurance

   (478   (473

Other

   (3   (179
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total long-term deferred tax liabilities

   (3,441  —       (10,896   (9,695
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total net deferred tax assets

  $4,885   $9,586    $3,153   $1,825 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

(1)Prior year was adjusted to conform to current year presentation.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers projected future taxable income and tax-planning strategies in making this assessment. Based on this assessment, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize its deferred income tax assets as of December 31, 2013.2016.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17,“Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,” which requires an entity to classify deferred tax liabilities and assets as noncurrent within a classified balance sheet. Previous guidance required deferred tax liabilities and assets be separated into current and noncurrent amounts on the balance sheet. The Company early adopted ASU 2015-17 in the fourth quarter of 2016 on a retrospective basis. The early adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, consolidated results of operations or financial statement disclosures.

A reconciliation for continuing operation of the statutory federal tax rate of 35.0%, 34.5% and 34.5% to the effective income tax rate, for continuing operations, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 20112014, is summarized as follows:

 

   For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
   2013  2012  2011 

Federal income tax at statutory rate

   35.0%  34.0%  34.0

State and local taxes, net of federal benefit

   5.2    5.9    5.3  

Jobs tax credits, net (1)

   (6.8  (7.5  (8.2

Nondeductible meals and entertainment

   0.4    (0.8  0.7  

Other

   (8.3  2.5    1.7  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effective income tax rate

   25.5%  34.1%  33.5
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

(1)Included in the jobs tax credit for the year ended December 31, 2012 was a one-time benefit of a 2.4% reduction from the Company’s statutory tax rate for the jobs tax credits earned in 2012 but not recorded until 2013. The Federal employment opportunity tax credits were reinstated in 2013 and were not an allowable decuction in 2012.
   December 31, 
   2016  2015  2014 

Federal income tax at statutory rate

   35.0 %  34.5  34.5

State and local taxes, net of federal benefit

   5.2   5.2   5.9 

Jobs tax credits, net

   (15.8  (11.1  (9.9

Nondeductible permanent items

   0.9   0.5   0.5 

Other

   (0.2  (3.4  0.2 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effective income tax rate

   25.1%  25.7%  31.2%
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Company is subject to taxation in the jurisdictions in which it operates. The Company continues to remain subject to examination by U.S. federal authorities for the years 20092013 through 20132016 and for various state authorities for the years 20092012 through 2013. As part of2016.

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the acquisition of Addus HealthCare in 2006, the selling stockholders agreed to assume and indemnify the successor forCompany did not have any federal or state tax liabilities prior to the acquisition date.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits under ASC Topic 740 at December 31, 2013 was $115. If740. During 2015, the Company believed that it no longer had any uncertain tax positions that required a reserve and therefore recognized the entire amount would favorably impactprevious $0.1 million unrecognized tax benefit during 2015. During 2016, the effective tax rate in future periods. Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are recognized in interest expense and general and administrative expenses, respectively. The Company doesdid not anticipaterecord a material change in its liabilitiesreserve for uncertain tax positions during the next 12 months.positions.

A summary of the activities associated with the Company’s reserve for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

   Unrecognized
Tax Benefits
 

Balance at December 31, 2011

  $115  

Increases related to current year tax positions

   —    
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

  $115  

Increases related to current year tax positions

   —    
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

  $115  
  

 

 

 
   Unrecognized
Tax Benefits
(Amounts in
Thousands)
 

Balance at December 31, 2014

  $115 

Decreases related to current year tax positions

   (115
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

  $—   

Decreases related to current year tax positions

   —   
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

  $—   
  

 

 

 

10.ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to uncertain tax positions in interest expense and penalties within operating expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Accrued interest and penalties are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets within accrued interest and penalties for uncertain tax positions. The Company did not have any uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2016 or December 31, 2015, and as a result, it has not recorded a liability for interest and penalties for either year respectively.

9. Stock Options and Restricted Stock Awards

Stock Options

The 2006 Plan provides for the grant of non-qualified stock options to directors and eligible employees, as defined in the 2006 Plan. AAs of December 31, 2016, a total of 899approximately 899,000 of Holdings’ shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan. The number of options to be granted and the terms thereof were approved by Holdings’ board of directors. The option price for each share of common stock subject to an option may be greater than or equal to the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant. The stock options generally vest ratably over a five year period and expire 10 years from the date of grant, if not previously exercised.

In September 2009, the Company’s board of directors and stockholders adopted and approved the 2009 Plan. The 2009 Plan provides for the grant of 750approximately 1,500,000 incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, deferred stock units, restricted stock units, other stock units and performance shares.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

A summary of stock option activity and weighted average exercise price is as follows:

 

  For The Year Ended December 31,  For The Year Ended December 31, 
  2013   2012   2011  2016 2015 2014 
  Options Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Options Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Options Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Options
(Amounts in
Thousands)
 Weighted
Average
Exercise

Price
 Options
(Amounts in
Thousands)
 Weighted
Average
Exercise

Price
 Options
(Amounts in
Thousands)
 Weighted
Average
Exercise

Price
 

Outstanding, beginning of period

   596   $8.11     775   $7.69     588   $8.63    650  $12.70   684  $11.43   647  $8.80 

Granted

   177    10.93     36    4.49     229    5.33    285   20.03   40   26.49   121   22.97 

Exercised

   (94  9.09     (5  4.53     —       (380  8.77   (44  8.51   (66  6.90 

Forfeited/Cancelled

   (32  7.89     (209  6.02     (42  7.93    (150  17.40   (30  10.53   (18  9.26 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Outstanding, end of period

   647   $8.80     596   $8.11     775   $7.69    405  $19.71   650  $12.70   684  $11.43 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The following table summarizes stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2013:2016:

 

   Outstanding   Exercisable 

Exercise Price

  Options   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Options   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 

$4.06 – $5.93

   143     7.4    $4.59     74     7.2    $4.64  

$9.26 – $23.22

   504     5.4     9.93     324     3.3     9.36  
  

 

 

       

 

 

     
   647     5.8    $8.80     398     4.1    $8.48  
  

 

 

       

 

 

     

Exercise Price

  Outstanding   Exercisable 
  Options   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
   Weighted
Average
Exercise

Price
   Options   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
   Weighted
Average
Exercise

Price
 

$4.46 - $8.91

   30,453    5.50   $7.18    28,578    5.40   $7.07 

$10.00 - $35.00

   374,304    8.80    20.72    56,728    7.40    22.99 
  

 

 

       

 

 

     
   404,757    8.5   $19.71    85,306    6.80   $17.66 
  

 

 

       

 

 

     

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The Company historically used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of its stock based payment awards under its 2006 Plan, but beginning October 28, 2009 under its 2009 Plan it began using an enhanced Hull-White Trinomial model. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payments utilizing the Black-Scholes model and the Enhanced Hull-White Trinomial model is affected by Holdings’ stock price and a number of assumptions, including expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected term, expected dividendsdividend yield, expected forfeiture rate, expected turn-over rate, and the expected exercise multiple. Holdings did not have a history of market prices of its common stock as it was not a public company prior to the IPO, and as such management estimates volatility based on the volatilities of a peer group of publicly traded companies. The expected term of options is based on the Company’s estimate of when options will be exercised in the future. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on observed interest rates appropriate for the terms of the Company’s awards. The dividend assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of not paying dividends. The expected turn-over rate represents the expected forfeitures due to employee turnover and is based on historical rates experienced by the Company. The expected exercise multiple represents the mean ratio of the stock price to the exercise price at which employees are expected to exercise their options.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

The weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted as calculated using the Black-Scholes model and the Enhanced Hull-White Trinomial model and the related assumptions follow:

 

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  

For the Year Ended December 31,

  2016 2015 2014 
  

2013

Grants

  

2012

Grants

  

2011

Grants

Grants Grants Grants 

Weighted average fair value

  $5.14  $2.09  $2.54   $9.32   $9.18   $10.69 

Risk-free discount rate

  2.07% – 2.96%  1.59% – 1.95%  3.17%   1.70% - 2.02  2.29  2.12% - 2.73

Expected life

  6.0 – 6.25 years  6.0 – 6.5 years  6.0 – 6.5 years   8.20 years   8.20 years   7.70-8.20 years 

Dividend yield

  —    —    —       —   —     —   

Volatility

  47%  42% – 51%  42% – 51%   47  47  47

Expected turn-over rate

  5%  5%  5%   2  2  5

Expected exercise multiple

  2.2  2.2  2.2   2.2   2.2   2.2 

Stock option compensation expense, for continuing and discontinued operations, totaled $276, $181$0.6 million, $0.6 million and $254$0.5 million for the three years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. As of December 31, 2013,2016, there was $885$2.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost that is expected to be recognized over a period of five years.

The intrinsic value of vested and outstanding stock options was $5,570$1.5 million and $6,936, respectively$1.9 million, $5.9 million and $7.0 million and $6.3 million and $8.8 million as of December 31, 2013. 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 20132016, 2015 and 2014 was $288. $3.9 million, $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

There were 94approximately 380,000, 44,000 and 66,000 stock options exercised in 2016, 2015 and 2014 respectively. For 2016 and 2015, none of which 67the options exercised were issued as part of a cashless exchange and 15 stockexchange. For 2014, 26,000 of the options exercised of which 5 were issued as part of a cashless exchange in 2013exchange.

The Company recognized an excess tax benefit from the exercise of stock options of $1.1 million, $0.3 million and 2012, respectively.$0.8 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, as a credit to additional paid-in capital rather than a reduction of income tax expense.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Restricted Stock Awards

In 2013,2016, management awarded 63108,000 shares of restricted stock awards under the 2009 Plan with a weighted average grant date fair value of $9.61$21.14 per share. As of December 31, 2013, $4722016, $1.6 million of unearned compensation related to unvested awards of restricted stock will be recognized over the remaining vesting terms of the awards.

The following table summarizes the status of unvested restricted stock awards outstanding at December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011:2014:

 

  For The Year Ended December 31,  For The Year Ended December 31, 
  2013   2012   2011  2016 2015 2014 
  Restricted
Stock
Awards
 Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
   Restricted
Stock
Awards
 Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
   Restricted
Stock
Awards
 Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
  Restricted
Stock
Awards
(Amounts in
Thousands)
 Weighted
Average

Grant
Date  Fair

Value
 Restricted
Stock
Awards
(Amounts in

Thousands)
 Weighted
Average

Grant
Date  Fair

Value
 Restricted
Stock Awards
(Amounts
in Thousands)
 Weighted
Average

Grant
Date  Fair

Value
 

Unvested restricted stock awards

   42   $4.80     21   $5.95     6   $6.85  

Unvested restricted stock awards, beginning of period

  84  $18.91   79  $15.16   70  $9.13 

Awarded

   63    9.61     44    4.48     24    5.63    108   21.14   58   23.32   36   22.75 

Vested

   (32  4.65     (20  5.14     (8  5.64    (20  24.12   (38  17.02   (22  10.34 

Forfeited

   (3  5.32     (3  5.93     (1  5.93    (69  17.17   (15  21.46   (5  6.66 
  

 

    

 

    

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Unvested restricted stock awards at December 31,

   70   $9.13     42   $4.80     21   $5.95  

Unvested restricted stock awards, end of period

  103  $20.84   84  $18.91   79  $15.16 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The fair market value of restricted stock awards that vested during the year ended December 31, 20132016 was $573.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

$0.4 million.

Restricted stock award compensation expense, for continuing and discontinued operations, totaled $239, $160$0.5 million, $0.9 million and $77$0.3 million for the three years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

Shares available under the 2006 Plan and the 2009 Plan were 546 and 853, respectively,598,442, as of December 31, 2013.2016. The Company does not plan on issuingcannot issue any further grants under the 2006 Plan.

11.10. Operating Leases and Related Party Transactions

The Company leases its branch office space under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2019.2025. In addition to rent, the Company is typically responsible for taxes, maintenance, insurance and common area costs. A number of the office leases also contain escalation and renewal option clauses. Total rent expense on these office leases was $2,925, $3,380$2.9 million, $3.0 million and $3,495$2.7 million for continuing and discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 2011,2014, respectively. In connection with the sale of the Home Health Business, the Company entered into subleases for all or a portion of 135 of the Company’s leased properties and assigned nine leases to the purchasers. Assigned leases are not included in the schedule below.

The Company leasesentered into a 132 month lease with a third party for approximately 59,000 square feet (unaudited) of office space in Downers Grove, IL for its corporate headquarters. The Company assumed occupancy in May 2014. Rental expense relating to this lease amounted to $0.8 million and $0.8 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In 2016, the contact center

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

contained within the Downers Grove corporate headquarters closed. As a result, approximately 21,000 square feet (unaudited) of the office space in Downers Grove is unused and the related payments included in restructuring and other expenses. Additionally, the Company entered into a 64 month lease with a third party for approximately 12,000 square feet (unaudited) of office space in Frisco, Texas which also serves as our corporate headquarters. The Company assumed occupancy in July 2016. Rental expense relating to this lease amounted to $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Previously, the Company leased its corporate office space from a former member of its board of directors, who is also a stockholder of the Company, underCompany. Under the terms of an operating lease that expired in June 2013; this lease agreement is being operated on a month to month basis.basis through May 2014. Rental expense relating to this lease amounted to $483, $486 and $409$0.2 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.2014.

During 2011, the Company entered into a lease for its telecom system under a five year operating lease that expiresexpired in MayJune 2016. Total expense on the telecom lease for continuing and discontinued operations was $379, $285$0.5 million, $0.6 million and $62$0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively. TheIn 2016, the Company has entereddecided to retain the leased telecom system by entering into a capital lease agreement for a new corporate headquarters with a third party and it expectsthe fair value of the equipment as described in Note 7 to occupy the new space in or around May of 2014.Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following is a schedule of the future minimum payments, exclusive of taxes and other operating expenses, required under the Company’s operating leases. The payments owed with respect to the subleased properties of $0.0 million and unoccupied properties of $1.8 million included in accrued restructuring, have not been excluded fromincluded in the table below because the Company remains liable for payments in the event that the sublessee does not make the required payment to the landlord.

 

   Rent Amount 

2014

  $2,964  

2015

   2,656  

2016

   2,306  

2017

   1,680  

2018

   1,395  

Thereafter

   5,928  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $16,929  
  

 

 

 

   Rent
(Amount in
Thousands)
 

2017

  $3,855 

2018

   3,225 

2019

   2,340 

2020

   1,930 

2021

   1,745 

Thereafter

   3,420 
  

 

 

 

Total

  $16,515 
  

 

 

 

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

12. Stockholder’s Equity

2009 Stock Incentive Plan

In September 2009, the Company’s board of directors and stockholders adopted and approved the 2009 Plan. The 2009 Plan when established provided for the grant of 750 incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, deferred stock units, restricted stock units, other stock units and performance shares. In May 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors and stockholders approved an increase in the number of incentive stock options to 1,500 which was approved by the stockholders at the 2013 Annual Meeting.

13.11. Segment Data

The Company has historically segregated its results into two distinct reportingreportable segments: the home & community segment and the home health segment. As a result of the sale of the Home Health Business, in 2013, the Company has reported the operating results for the Home Health Business asin discontinued operations. Therefore, all of the Company’s continuing operations are reported as one operating segment.

14.12. Employee Benefit Plans

The Company’s 401(k) Retirement Plan covers all non-union employees. The 401(k) plan is a defined contribution plan that provides for matching contributions by the Company. Matching contributions are discretionary and subject to change by management. Under the provisions of the 401(k) plan, employees can contribute up to the maximum percentage and limits allowable under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The Company provided a matching contribution, equal to 6.0% of the employees’ contributions, totaling $46, $44, and $49$0.0 million for continuing and discontinued operations for the yearyears ended December 31, 2013, 2012,2016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

15.ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

13. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

TheFrom time to time, the Company is a partysubject to legal and/or administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course ofincidental to its business. It is the opinion of management that the outcome of suchpending legal and/or administrative proceedings will not have a material effect on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Income.

On January 20, 2016, the Company was served with a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the Company and Cigna Corporation by Stop Illinois Marketing Fraud, LLC, a qui tam relator formed for the purpose of bringing this action. In the action, the plaintiff alleges, inter alia, violations of the federal False Claims Act relating primarily to allegations of violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and allegedly improper referrals of patients from our home care division to our home health business, substantially all of which was sold in 2013. The plaintiff seeks to recover damages, fees and costs under the federal False Claims Act including treble damages, civil penalties and its attorneys’ fees. The U.S. government has declined to intervene at this time. Plaintiff amended its complaint on April 4, 2016 to include additional allegations in support of its False Claims Act claims, including alleged violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. The Company and Cigna Corporation filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on June 6, 2016. Plaintiff filed its opposition to the Company’s motion on July 22, 2016. The Company’s reply in further support of the motion to dismiss was filed on August 23, 2016. On February 3, 2017, the Court granted Cigna Corporation’s motion to dismiss in full, and granted our motion to dismiss in part allowing Plaintiff another chance to amend its complaint. Plaintiff timely filed a second amended complaint on March 10, 2017, withdrawing its conspiracy claim under the Federal False Claims Act and adding an explicit claim under the Illinois False Claims Act for the same underlying kickback allegations. The Company intends to defend the litigation vigorously believes the case will not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position andcondition or results of operations.

On May 4, 2016, the Company, together with 59 other social service and healthcare providers in the State of Illinois, filed an action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois against certain individuals in their official capacities as agents of the Illinois Department of Human Services, the Illinois Department on Aging, the Illinois Department of Public Health, the Illinois Department of HealthCare and Family Services, the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, the Illinois Department of Corrections and the Illinois Department of Central Management Services, including the Governor of Illinois. On July 20, 2016, a third amended complaint was filed by the plaintiffs, who now comprise 97 similarly situated providers and provider organizations. In the action, the plaintiffs, including the Company, allege to have entered into contracts with the various defendants based in part on the Governor’s proposed budget, which provided for funding for the services to be provided by plaintiffs thereunder. The Governor subsequently vetoed all of the relevant appropriations bills on June 25, 2015 and again vetoed an appropriations bill that included funding for the contracts on June 10, 2016. While the defendant officer and agency heads have continued to enforce such contracts, since August 1, 2016, the Company received an aggregate of approximately $65.4 million in payments from the State of Illinois from the stopgap budget enacted on June 30, 2016. In those actions, plaintiffs alleged the defendant officers and agency heads acted beyond the scope of their legal authority in entering into and enforcing contracts with no intent to perform under such contracts by failing to pay amounts due thereunder when due. The action also alleged that the Governor of Illinois’ vetoes of appropriations for such contracts violated the Illinois Constitution. Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief to payment of overdue bills to prevent irreparable harm, including imperiling the State’s infrastructure for delivery of human services. On August 31, 2016, the Court denied plaintiffs’ petitions for declaratory and injunctive relief and dismissed the actions with prejudice. Plaintiffs timely filed a notice of appeal on September 30, 2016.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Employment Agreements

The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain members of senior management. The terms of these agreements are up to four years with the potential to auto-renew and include non-compete and nondisclosure provisions, as well as provide for defined severance payments in the event of termination.

A substantial percentage of the Company’s workforce is represented by the Service Employees International Union (“SEIU”). The Company has a national agreement with the SEIU. Wages and benefits are negotiated at the local level at various times throughout the year. These negotiations are often initiated when the Company receives increases in hourly rates from various state agencies. Upon expiration of these collective bargaining agreements, the Company may not be able to negotiate labor agreements on satisfactory terms with these labor unions.

16.14. Severance and Restructuring

During 2016, the Company took steps to streamline and simplify its operations. The expenses recorded for year ended December 31, 2016 included costs related to terminated employees and other direct costs associated with implementing these initiatives. Other direct costs included contract termination costs, accelerated depreciation and asset write-offs. The Company incurred total pretax expenses related to these streamlining initiatives of approximately $8.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company expects some additional restructuring and other costs to occur, however, the amount and timing cannot be determined at this time.

The following provides the components of and changes in our severance and restructuring accruals:

   Employee
Termination
Costs
   Restructuring
and Other
 
   (Amounts in Thousands) 

Balance at December 31, 2015

  $—     $—   

Provision

   3,230    4,786 

Utilization

   (1,904   (3,000
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

  $1,326   $1,786 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Employee termination costs represent accrued severance payable to terminated employees with employment and/or separation agreements with the Company. The terminations resulted mainly from the closure of the contact center and other changes made to the executive leadership team made during the year ended December 31, 2016. The remaining accruals as of December 31, 2016 are expected to be paid through January 2019.

Restructuring and other costs comprised of costs related to lease commitments and write-offs of leasehold improvements and property and equipment resulting from the closure of three adult day services centers in Illinois and for unused contact center office space, costs related to a discontinued internally developed software product and fees for the termination of various contracts with outside vendors for the year ended December 31, 2016.

The aforementioned accruals are included in Accrued Expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the aforementioned expenses are included in General and Administrative Expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

15. Significant Payors

A substantial portion of the Company’s net service revenues and accounts receivables are derived from services performed for federal, state and local governmental agencies. One state governmental agency represented 59%The Illinois Department on Aging accounted for 42.1%, 57%48.8% and 51%53.2% of the Company’s net service revenues from continuing operations for 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 2011,2014, respectively.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

The related receivables due from Medicarethe Illinois Department on Aging represented 55.4% and the state agency represented 1% and 66%54.9% of the Company’s net accounts receivable at December 31, 2013, respectively,2016 and 7% and 69% of the Company’s accounts receivable at December 31, 2012,2015, respectively.

17.16. Concentration of Cash

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally ofinclude cash. The Company maintains cash with financial institutions which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.

18.ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

17. Unaudited Summarized Quarterly Financial Information

The following is a summary of the Company’s unaudited quarterly results of operations (amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data):operations:

 

  Year Ended December 31, 2016   Year Ended December 31, 2015 
 Year Ended December 31, 2013 Year Ended December 31, 2012   Dec. 31   Sept. 30   Jun. 30   Mar. 31   Dec. 31   Sept. 30   Jun. 30   Mar. 31 
 Dec. 31 Sept. 30 Jun. 30 Mar. 31 Dec. 31 Sept. 30 Jun. 30 Mar. 31   (Amounts and Shares in Thousands, Except Per Share Data) 

Net service revenues

 $69,882   $67,306   $65,755   $62,998   $63,775   $61,211   $60,440   $58,889    $103,657   $103,502   $100,927   $92,602   $84,760   $84,331   $85,809   $81,915 

Gross profit

  18,102    17,226    16,613    15,798    17,537    15,683    15,807    15,024     28,658    27,423    25,695    24,319    22,193    23,522    23,682    21,926 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income from continuing operations

  3,476    4,263    3,980    3,742    5,261    3,867    3,217    3,318     7,693    2,495    4,394    653    3,015    4,284    5,098    3,627 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income from continuing operations

  3,124    2,770    2,582    2,687    3,503    2,204    1,835    1,746     7,471    1,699    2,600    157    3,051    2,887    3,253    2,162 

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations

  (2,239  (203  (150  10,574    242    (407  (371  (1,117
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss)

 $885   $2,567   $2,432   $13,261   $3,745   $1,797   $1,464   $629  

Earnings from discontinued operations

   97    —      —      —      270    —        —   

Net income

  $7,568   $1,699   $2,600   $157   $3,321   $2,887   $3,253   $2,162 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Average shares outstanding:

                        

Basic

  10,826    10,787    10,785    10,778    10,772    10,761    10,761    10,756     11,383    11,367    11,361    11,022    11,007    11,007    10,989    10,947 

Diluted

  11,075    11,071    11,016    10,845    10,807    10,773    10,785    10,760     11,494    11,417    11,385    11,178    11,220    11,247    11,212    11,612 

Income (loss) per common share:

        

Basic net income per share

        

Income per common share:

                

Basic

                

Continuing operations

 $0.29   $0.26   $0.24   $0.25   $0.33   $0.20   $0.17   $0.16    $0.66   $0.15   $0.23   $0.01   $0.28   $0.26   $0.30   $0.20 

Discontinued operations

  (0.21  (0.02  (0.01  0.98    0.02    (0.03  (0.03  (0.10   0.01    —      —      —      0.02    —      —      —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Basic net income per share

 $0.08   $0.24   $0.23   $1.23   $0.35   $0.17   $0.14   $0.06    $0.67   $0.15   $0.23   $0.01   $0.30   $0.26   $0.30   $0.20 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Diluted net income per share

                        

Continuing operations

 $0.28   $0.25   $0.23   $0.25   $0.33   $0.20   $0.17   $0.16    $0.65   $0.15   $0.23   $0.01   $0.27   $0.26   $0.29   $0.19 

Discontinued operations

  (0.20  (0.02  (0.01  0.98    0.02    (0.03  (0.03  (0.10   0.01    —      —      —      0.02    —      —      —   
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Diluted net income per share

 $0.08   $0.23   $0.22   $1.23   $0.35   $0.17   $0.14   $0.06    $0.66   $0.15   $0.23   $0.01   $0.29   $0.26   $0.29   $0.19 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

18. Subsequent Events

On January 3, 2017, Maxine Hochhauser ceased serving as the Chief Operating Officer of Addus HealthCare. Effective January 16, 2017, W. Bradley Bickham was appointed as the Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of Addus HealthCare.

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements—(Continued)

(amounts and shares in thousands, except per share data)—(Continued)

 

ADDUS HOMECARE CORPORATIONOn January 30, 2017 and February 24, 2017, the Company drew $10.0 million and $10.0 million, respectively, of its revolving credit line, described in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 7. Long-Term Debt, to fund on-going operations.

AND SUBSIDIARIESIn order to focus on providing services to consumers in their homes, effective March 1, 2017, Addus ceased the adult day services businesses and sold substantially all of the assets used in our adult day services centers for approximately $2.4 million. The gain on the sale of the three remaining adult day services centers is approximately $2.1 million.

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

SCHEDULE II

(in thousands)Amounts In Thousands)

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  Balance at
beginning
of period
   Additions/
charges
   Deductions*   Balance at
end of
period
   Balance at
beginning
of period
   Additions/
charges
   Deductions*   Balance at
end of
period
 

Year ended December 31, 2013

        

Year ended December 31, 2016

        

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $4,466     3,020     3,346    $4,140    $4,850    7,373    4,860   $7,363 

Year ended December 31, 2012

        

Year ended December 31, 2015

        

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $7,189     2,877     5,600    $4,466    $3,881    4,309    3,340   $4,850 

Year ended December 31, 2011

        

Year ended December 31, 2014

        

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $6,723     4,275     3,809    $7,189    $4,140    2,818    3,077   $3,881 

 

*Write-offs, net of recoveries

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit
Number

F-36

Description of Document

    3.1Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Addus HomeCare Corporation dated as of November 2, 2009 (filed on November 20, 2009 as Exhibit 3.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and incorporated by reference herein)
    3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws of Addus HomeCare Corporation (filed on September 21, 2009 as Exhibit 3.5 to Amendment No. 2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
    4.1Form of Common Stock Certificate (filed on October 2, 2009 as Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
    4.2Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 19, 2006, by and among Addus HomeCare Corporation, Eos Capital Partners III, L.P., Eos Partners SBIC III, L.P., Freeport Loan Fund LLC, W. Andrew Wright, III, Addus Term Trust, W. Andrew Wright Grantor Retained Annuity Trust, Mark S. Heaney, James A. Wright and Courtney E. Panzer (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 4.2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.1Separation and General Release Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2009, between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and W. Andrew Wright, III (filed on September 21, 2009 as Exhibit 10.1(b) to Amendment No. 2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.2Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated May 6, 2008, between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Mark S. Heaney (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.3Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated September 30, 2009, between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Mark S. Heaney (filed on October 2, 2009 as Exhibit 10.2(a) to Amendment No. 4 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.4Employment Agreement, dated November 29, 2010, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Dennis Meulemans (filed on December 1, 2010 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.5Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated August 27, 2007, between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Darby Anderson (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.4 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.6Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated September 30, 2009, between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Darby Anderson (filed on October 2, 2009 as Exhibit 10.4(a) to Amendment No. 4 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.7Addus HealthCare, Inc. Home Health and Home Care Division Vice President and Regional Director Bonus Plan (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.10 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.8Addus HealthCare, Inc. Support Center Vice President and Department Director Bonus Plan (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.11 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)


Exhibit
Number

Description of Document

  10.9Addus Holding Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.12 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.10Director Form of Option Award Agreement under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.13 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.11Executive Form of Option Award Agreement under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.14 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.12Form of Indemnification Agreement (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.16 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.13License Agreement, dated March 24, 2006, between McKesson Information Solutions, LLC and Addus HealthCare, Inc. (filed on August 26, 2009 as Exhibit 10.17 to Amendment No. 1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.14Contract Supplement to the License Agreement, dated March 24, 2006 (filed on August 26, 2009 as Exhibit 10.17(a) to Amendment No. 1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.15Contract Supplement to the License Agreement, dated March 28, 2006 (filed on August 26, 2009 as Exhibit 10.17(b) to Amendment No. 1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.16Amendment to License Agreement, dated March 28, 2006, between McKesson Information Solutions, LLC and Addus HealthCare, Inc. (filed on August 26, 2009 as Exhibit 10.17(c) to Amendment No. 1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.17Lease, dated April 1, 1999, between W. Andrew Wright, III and Addus HealthCare, Inc. (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.18 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement onForm S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.18First Amendment to Lease, dated as of April 1, 2002, between W. Andrew Wright, III and Addus HealthCare, Inc. (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.18(a) to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.19Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of September 19, 2006, between W. Andrew Wright, III and Addus HealthCare, Inc. (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.18(b) to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.20Third Amendment to Lease, dated as of September 1, 2008, between W. Andrew Wright, III and Addus HealthCare, Inc. (filed on July 17, 2009 as Exhibit 10.18(c) to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.21Addus HomeCare Corporation 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (filed on September 21, 2009 as Exhibit 10.20 to Amendment No. 2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.22Form of Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (filed on September 21, 2009 as Exhibit 10.20(a) to Amendment No. 2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.23Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (filed on September 21, 2009 as Exhibit 10.20(b) to Amendment No. 2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 and incorporated by reference herein)


Exhibit
Number

Description of Document

  10.24Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2009, by and among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., Fort Smith Home Health Agency, Inc., Little Rock Home Health Agency, Inc., Lowell Home Health Agency, Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation and Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., as borrowers, Fifth Third Bank, as agent, the financial institutions that are or may from time to time become parties thereto, and Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantor (filed on November 5, 2009 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.25Consent and Amendment No. 1 to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 18, 2010, by and among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., Fort Smith Home Health Agency, Inc., Little Rock Home Health Agency, Inc., Lowell Home Health Agency, Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation and Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., as borrowers, Fifth Third Bank, as agent, the financial institutions that are or may from time to time become parties thereto, and Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantor (filed on March 18, 2010 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.26Joinder, Consent and Amendment No. 2 to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2010, by and among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (South Carolina), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., Fort Smith Home Health Agency, Inc., Little Rock Home Health Agency, Inc., Lowell Home Health Agency, Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation and Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., as borrowers, Fifth Third Bank, as agent, the financial institutions that are or may from time to time become parties thereto, and Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantor (filed on July 27, 2010 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.27Joinder, Consent and Amendment No. 3 to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2011, by and among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., Fort Smith Home Health Agency, Inc., Little Rock Home Health Agency, Inc., Lowell Home Health Agency, Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation and Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., Addus HealthCare (South Carolina), Inc. Addus HealthCare (Delaware), Inc., as borrowers, Fifth Third Bank, as agent, the financial institutions that are or may from time to time become parties thereto, and Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantor (filed on May 25, 2011 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference)
  10.28Amendment No. 4 to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2011, effective as of June 30, 2011, by and among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., Fort Smith Home Health Agency, Inc., Little Rock Home Health Agency, Inc., Lowell Home Health Agency, Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation, Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., Addus HealthCare (South Carolina), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Delaware), Inc., as borrowers, Fifth Third Bank, as agent, the financial institutions from time to time parties thereto, and Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantor (filed on July 29, 2011 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference)


Exhibit
Number

Description of Document

  10.29Amendment No. 2 to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated November 17, 2011, by and between Addus HealthCare, Inc. and Mark S. Heaney (filed on November 23, 2011 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference)
  10.30Amendment No. 5 to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2012, by and among Addus HealthCare, Inc., Addus HealthCare (Idaho), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Indiana), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Nevada), Inc., Addus HealthCare (New Jersey), Inc., Addus HealthCare (North Carolina), Inc., Benefits Assurance Co., Inc., Fort Smith Home Health Agency, Inc., Little Rock Home Health Agency, Inc., Lowell Home Health Agency, Inc., PHC Acquisition Corporation, Professional Reliable Nursing Service, Inc., Addus HealthCare (South Carolina), Inc., Addus HealthCare (Delaware), Inc., as borrowers, Fifth Third Bank, as agent, the financial institutions from time to time parties thereto, and Addus HomeCare Corporation, as guarantor (filed on March 16, 2012 as Exhibit 10.41 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
  10.31Summary of Independent Director Compensation Policy (filed on March 16, 2012 as Exhibit 10.42 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
  10.32The Executive Nonqualified “Excess” Plan Adoption Agreement, by Addus HealthCare, Inc., dated April 1, 2012 (filed on April 5, 2012 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated by reference herein)
  10.33The Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan Document, dated April 1, 2012 (filed on April 5, 2012 as Exhibit 99.2 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference)
  10.34Employment Agreement, effective June 18, 2012, by and between Addus Healthcare, Inc. and Inna Berkovich (filed on June 20, 2012 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference)
  10.35Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 7, 2013, by and among Addus HealthCare, Inc., its subsidiaries identified therein, LHC Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries identified therein (filed on March 6, 2013 as Exhibit 99.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated by reference herein)
  21.1Subsidiaries of the Addus HomeCare Corporation (filed on March 28, 2011 as Exhibit 22.1 to Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
  23.1Consent of BDO USA, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*
  31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
  31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
  32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
  32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


Exhibit
Number

Description of Document

101The following materials from Addus HomeCare Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2013, formatted in Extensive Business Reporting Language (XBRL), (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

*Filed herewith
**Furnished herewith