UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM10-K

 

 

[X]        ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152018

OR

[    ]        TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                        to                        

Commission File No.:000-51826

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

LOGO

Washington 47-0956945

(State or other jurisdiction


of incorporation or organization)

 (IRS Employer Identification No.)

Suite 1120, 700 West Pender Street,

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

V6C 1G8

((Address of Principal Executive Office)Office)

 

V6C 1G8

((Zip Code)Code)

Registrant’s telephone number including area code:(604)684-1099

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

[    ]  Yes  [X]  No  ☐

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  [    ]  Yes  [ X ]  No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during1934during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  [X]  No  [    ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  [ X ]  No  [    ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of RegulationS-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K.  [ X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  [X]

    ☒

  

Accelerated filer  [    ]

 

Non-accelerated filer  [    ]

 

    ☐

Smaller reporting company    [    ]

   

(Do not check if a smaller

    reporting company)Emerging growth company    

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Act).  [    ]  Yes  [X]  No

The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s voting andnon-voting common equity held bynon-affiliates of the Registrant as of June 30, 2015,2018, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the closing price of the voting stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on such date, was approximately $882.4$1,072.5 million.

As of February 11, 2016,13, 2019, the Registrant had 64,656,13865,201,661 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain information that will be contained in the definitive proxy statement for the Registrant’s annual meeting to be held in 20162019 is incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form10-K.

 

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDINGFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

  41

INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA

1

CURRENCY

2 

PART I

  63 

ITEM 1.

  

BUSINESS

  63 

Mercer

  63

Corporate Strategy

8

The Pulp Industry

9 

Corporate Strategy

9

The Pulp Industry

10

Pulp Production

  16 

Generation and Sales of “Green”Green Energy and Chemicals at ourOur Mills

  1716 

Cash Production Costs

  2019 

Production Costs

  2019 

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

  23 

Transportation

  25 

Capital Expenditures

  25 

Innovation

  2827 

Environmental

  28 

Climate Change

  2930 

Human Resources

  31 

Wood Products Industry

 32

Description of Certain Indebtedness

  3233 

Internet Availability and Additional Information

  3436 

ITEM 1A.

  

RISK FACTORS

  3637 

ITEM 1B.

  

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

51
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES51
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

  54 

ITEM 4.2.

  

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURESPROPERTIES

  5554 

ITEM 3.

PART IILEGAL PROCEEDINGS

  5658 

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

58

PART II

59

ITEM 5.

  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES  5659 

ITEM 6.

  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA  5961 

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

  6063 

ITEM 7.

  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS  6164 

Results of Operations

  6164 

Year Ended December  31, 20152018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20142017

  6569 

Year Ended December  31, 20142017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20132016

  6772 

Sensitivities

  6875 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

  6976 

Balance Sheet Data

  7178 

Sources and Uses of Funds

  7178 

Credit Facilities and Debt Covenants

  7279 

Off-Balance-Sheet Activities

  7380 

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

  7381 

Foreign Currency

  7481 

Credit Ratings of 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes

  7481 

Critical Accounting Policies

  7482 

New Accounting Standards

  7885 

ITEM 7A.

  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK  7986 

Derivatives

79

Interest RateForeign Currency Exchange Risk

  81

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

8186 

(i)


PulpProduct Price Risk

  8287 

EnergyFiber Price Risk

  8287 

Interest Rate Risk

87

Credit Risk

88

Risk Management and Derivatives

88

ITEM 8.

  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA  8289 

ITEM 9.

  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE  8289 

ITEM 9A.

  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES  8290 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

  8290 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

  8390 

Changes in Internal Controls

  8391 

ITEM 9B.

  OTHER INFORMATION  8391 

PART III

  8492 

ITEM 10.

  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  8492 

Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Directors

 92

Other Executive Officers

94

Audit Committee

  8896 

Compensation and Human ResourceResources Committee

  8896 

Governance and Nominating Committee

  8897 

Environmental, Health and Safety Committee

  8997 

Lead Director/Deputy Chairman

  8997 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Anti-Corruption Policy

  8997 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

  8998 

ITEM 11.

  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  9098 

ITEM 12.

  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS  9098 

ITEM 13.

  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE  9098 

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

  9098 

ITEM 14.

  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES  9099 

PART IV

  9199 

ITEM 15.

  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES  9199

ITEM 16.

FORM10-K SUMMARY101 

(ii)


CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDINGFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form10-K includes “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of thePrivate Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They often include words such as “believes”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “estimates”, “intends”, “plans”, “seeks” or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs, such as “will”, “should”, “could”, “may”, “aims”, “intends” or “projects”. A forward-looking statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of future events or circumstances, and those future events or circumstances may not occur. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this annual report on Form10-K. These forward-looking statements are all based on currently available operating, financial and competitive information and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Our actual future results and trends may differ materially depending on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed under Item 1. “Business”, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”. Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not rely on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. Any or all of the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report on Form10-K and any other public statement made by us, including by our management, may turn out to be incorrect. We are including this cautionary note to make applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of thePrivate Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for forward-looking statements. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA

In this document,annual report on Form10-K, we rely on and refer to information and statistics regarding our market share and the markets in which we compete. We have obtained some of this market share information and industry data from internal surveys, market research, publicly available information and industry publications. Such reports generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy or completeness of such information is not guaranteed. Although we believe this information is reliable, we have not independently verified, and cannotnor can we guarantee, the accuracy or completeness of that information,information.

Statements in this annual report on Form10-K concerning the production capacity of our mills are management estimates based primarily on historically achieved levels of production and readers should use cautionassumptions regarding maintenance downtime. Statements concerning electrical generating capacity at our mills are also management estimates based primarily on our expected production (which largely determines the amount of electricity we can generate) and assumptions regarding maintenance downtime, in placing reliance on such information.

each case within manufacturers’ specifications of capacity.

(1)


CURRENCY

The following table sets out exchange rates, based on the noon buying rates in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, referred to as the “Noon Buying Rate”, for the conversion of U.S. dollars to euros and Canadian dollars in effect at the end of the following periods, the average exchange rates during these periods (based on daily Noon Buying Rates) and the range of high and low exchange rates for these periods:

 

  Year Ended December 31,
  Year Ended December 31,       2018          2017          2016          2015          2014    
  2015   2014   2013   2012   2011   ($/€)
          ($/€)         

End of period

   1.0859     1.2101     1.3779     1.3186     1.2973    1.1456  1.2022  1.0552  1.0859  1.2101

High for period

   1.0524     1.2101     1.2774     1.2062     1.2926    1.1281  1.0416  1.0375  1.0524  1.2101

Low for period

   1.2015     1.3927     1.3816     1.3463     1.4875    1.2488  1.2041  1.1516  1.2015  1.3927

Average for period

   1.1096     1.3297     1.3281     1.2859     1.3931    1.1817  1.1301  1.1072  1.1096  1.3297
          ($/C$)            ($/C$)

End of period

   0.7226     0.8620     0.9401     1.0042     0.9835    0.7329  0.7989  0.7448  0.7226  0.8620

High for period

   0.7148     0.8588     0.9348     0.9600     0.9430    0.7326  0.7275  0.6853  0.7148  0.8588

Low for period

   0.8529     0.9423     1.0164     1.0299     1.0584    0.8143  0.8243  0.7972  0.8529  0.9423

Average for period

   0.7830     0.9060     0.9712     1.0007     1.0121    0.7722  0.7710  0.7558  0.7830  0.9060

On February 8, 2016,11, 2019, the most recent weekly publication of the daily Noon Buying Rate before the filing of this annual report on Form10-K reported that the Noon Buying Rate as of February 5, 20168, 2019 for the conversion of U.S. dollars to euros and Canadian dollars was $1.1131$1.1326 per euro and $0.7207$0.7532 per Canadian dollar.

(2)


PART I

 

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

BUSINESS

In this document, please note the following:

 

references to “we”, “our”, “us”, the “Company” or “Mercer” mean Mercer International Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context clearly suggests otherwise, and references to “Mercer Inc.” mean Mercer International Inc. excluding its subsidiaries;

 

references to “net income (loss)” mean net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders;

references to “NBSK” mean northern bleached softwood kraft;

references to “ADMTs” mean air-dried metric tonnes;

references to “MW” mean megawatts and “MWh” mean megawatt hours; and

all references to “$” or “dollars” shall mean U.S. dollars, which is our reporting currency, unless otherwise stated; “€” refers to euros; and “C$” refers to Canadian dollars.dollars;

references to “NBHK” mean northern bleached hardwood kraft;

references to “NBSK” mean northern bleached softwood kraft;

references to “ADMTs” meanair-dried metric tonnes;

references to “MW” mean megawatts and “MWh” mean megawatt hours;

references to “Mfbm” mean thousand board feet of lumber;

references to “MMfbm” mean million board feet of lumber;

our lumber metrics are converted from cubic meters to Mfbm using a conversion ratio of 1.6 cubic meters of lumber equaling one Mfbm, which is the ratio commonly used in the industry; and

references to “net income (loss)” mean net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders.

Due to rounding, numbers presented throughout this report may not add up precisely to totals we provide and percentages may not precisely reflect the absolute figures.

Mercer

General

Mercer Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Washington whose common stock is quoted and listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (MERC).

We have two reporting operating segments, being Pulp and Wood Products.

We are one of the world’s largest producers of market“market” NBSK pulp, which leads tois pulp that is sold on the open market. Our size provides us increased presence, and better industry information in our markets and provides for close customer relationships with many large pulp consumers. We operateUntil December 10, 2018, we operated two modern and highly efficient NBSK mills in Eastern Germany and one NBSK mill in Western CanadaCanada.

On December 10, 2018, we acquired all of the shares of Mercer Peace River Pulp Ltd. (formerly Daishowa-Marubeni International Ltd.), referred to as “MPR”. MPR owns 100% of a bleached kraft pulp mill near Peace River, Alberta and have our headquartershas a 50% joint venture interest in Vancouver, Canada. the Cariboo Pulp & Paper Company, referred to as “CPP”, which owns the Cariboo NBSK mill in Quesnel, British Columbia.

(3)


We are the sole NBSK pulp producer, and the only significant producer ofmarket pulp for resale, known as “market pulp”,producer in Germany, which is the largest pulp import market in Europe. We are able to supply the growing pulp demand in China both through our Canadian mill’smills’ ready access to the Port of Vancouver and through our Stendal mill’s existing logistics arrangements. In addition, as a result of the significant investments we have made in co-generationcogeneration equipment, all of our mills generate and sell a significant amount of surplus “green” energy to regional utilities.energy. We also produce and sell tall oil, aby-product of our production process, which is used as both a chemical additive and as a “green”green energy source.

We currently employ approximately 1,469 people. Our three NBSK pulp millsentered the Wood Products segment in April 2017 when we acquired substantially all of the assets of the Friesau mill, one of Germany’s largest sawmills.

As at December 31, 2018 and after giving effect to the acquisition of MPR, we have consolidated annual production capacity of approximately 1.52.2 million ADMTs of NBSKkraft pulp, 550 million board feet of lumber and are capable of generating 305approximately 411.5 MW of electricity. Of our pulp capacity, approximately 1.9 million ADMTs or 86% is NBSK and the balance is NBHK.

Key operating details for each of our mills are as follows:

 

  

Rosenthal mill. Our Rosenthal mill is a modern, efficient ISO 9001, 14001 and 50001 certified NBSK pulp mill that has an annual production capacity of approximately 360,000 ADMTs and 57 MW of electrical generation. The Rosenthal mill generated and exported 157,977 MWh of electricity in 2018, resulting in approximately $17.1 million in revenues. The Rosenthal mill is located in the town of Blankenstein,Rosenthal am Rennsteig, Germany, approximately 300 kilometers south of Berlin.

 

  

Stendal mill. Our Stendal mill is astate-of-the-art, single-line, single line, ISO 9001, 14001 and 1400150001 certified NBSK pulp mill that has an annual production capacity of approximately 660,000 ADMTs and 148 MW of electrical generation. The Stendal mill is onegenerated and exported 338,426 MWh of the largest NBSK millselectricity in Europe.2018, resulting in approximately $36.1 million in revenues. The Stendal mill is located near the town of Stendal, Germany, approximately 130 kilometers west of Berlin.

 

 

Celgar mill. Our Celgar mill is a modern, efficient ISO 9001 and 14001 certified NBSK pulp mill withthat has an annual production capacity of approximately 520,000 ADMTs and 100 MW of electrical generation. The Celgar mill generated and exported 115,463 MWh of electricity in 2018, resulting in approximately $9.9 million in revenues. The Celgar mill is located near the city of Castlegar, British Columbia, Canada, approximately 600 kilometers east of Vancouver.

Peace River mill. Our Peace River mill is a modern ISO 14001 certified “swing” mill that produces both NBSK and NBHK pulp and has an annual production capacity of approximately 475,000 ADMTs and 65 MW of electrical generation. The Peace River mill generated and exported 3,316 MWh of electricity in 2018. The Peace River mill is located near the town of Peace River, Alberta, approximately 490 kilometers north of Edmonton. Through our Peace River mill, we have a 50% proportionate share of the annual production capacity of the Cariboo mill, which is approximately 170,000 ADMTs and 28.5 MW of electrical generation. The Cariboo mill is located in Quesnel, British Columbia, approximately 660 kilometers north of Vancouver. MPR also holds two 20-year renewable governmental forest management agreements and three deciduous timber allocations in Alberta with an aggregate allowable annual cut of approximately 2.4 million cubic meters of hardwood.

Friesau mill.Our Friesau mill is one of Germany’s largest sawmills with an annual production capacity of approximately 550 million board feet of lumber and 13 MW of

(4)


electrical generation from a modern biomass fueled cogeneration power plant built in 2009. The Friesau mill generated and exported 86,325 MWh of electricity in 2018, resulting in approximately $10.8 million in revenues. The Friesau mill is located approximately 16 kilometers west of our Rosenthal mill and has historically been one of the Rosenthal mill’s largest fiber suppliers.

We currently employ approximately 2,210 people and have our headquarters in Vancouver, Canada.

Pulp Segment

Our pulp mills are some of the newest and most modern and newest NBSK pulp mills in Europe and North America. We believe the relative age, production capacity and electrical generation capacity of our mills provide us with certain manufacturing cost and other advantages over many of our competitors. We believe our competitors’ older mills do not have the equipment or capacity to produce or sell surplus power or chemicals in a meaningful amount. In addition, since our mills are relatively new, they benefit from lower maintenance capital requirements and higher efficiency relative to many of our competitors’ mills.

The following table sets out our pulp production and pulp revenues for the periods indicated:

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  2015   2014   2013         2018(1)               2017               2016       

Pulp production (‘000 ADMTs)

   1,458.0     1,485.0     1,444.5     1,472.6    1,507.0    1,428.4   

Pulp sales (‘000 ADMTs)

   1,463.1     1,486.4     1,440.1     1,440.9    1,515.1    1,428.7   

Pulp revenues (in thousands)

  $    946,237    $  1,073,632    $      996,187      $    1,190,588     $    979,645     $    847,328   

(1)

Includes results of MPR since December 10, 2018.

Our modern pulp mills generate electricity, which is surplus to their operating requirements, providing our mills with a stable revenue source unrelated to pulp prices. Additionally, our German pulp mills generate tall oil from black liquor, which is sold to third parties for use in numerous applications includingbio-fuels. Since our energy and chemical production areby-products of our pulp production process, there are minimal incremental costs and our surplus energy and chemical sales are highly profitable. All of our mills generate and sell surplus energy to regional utilities.utilities or the regional electrical market. Our German mills benefit from special tariffs under Germany’sRenewable Energy Sources Act, referred to as the “Renewable Energy Act”, which provides for premium pricing on “green”green energy. Our recently acquired Peace River mill sells surplus energy to its regional electrical market. Each of our Celgar mill and the Cariboo mill is party to a fixed electricity purchase agreement with the regional public utility provider for the sale of surplus power through 2020.2020 and 2022, respectively, and, in the case of the Cariboo mill, renewable at the option of the joint venture for an additionalten-year term.

The following table sets out the amount of surplus energy we produced and sold and revenues from the sale of suchsurplus energy and chemicals in our pulp segment for the periods indicated:

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  2015   2014   2013   2018(1)   2017   2016 
  (MWh)   ($)   (MWh)   ($)   (MWh)   ($)   (MWh)   ($)   (MWh)   ($)   (MWh)   ($) 
      (thousands)       (thousands)       (thousands)       (in thousands)       (in thousands)       (in thousands) 

Surplus electricity

   814,966     74,736     807,758     88,758     699,051     79,372     615,182    63,189    822,120    77,867    785,845    71,539 

Chemicals

     12,231       12,722       12,826       14,427      14,203      12,756 
    

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

 

Total

         86,967           101,480             92,198            77,616           92,070           84,295 
    

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

 

(1)

Includes results of MPR since December 10, 2018, but does not include our interest in CPP, which is accounted for using the equity method.

(5)


Our strategic pulp mill locations position us well to serve customers in Europe, Asia and North America. Due to the proximity of our German mills to most of our European customers, we benefit from lower transportation costs relative to most of our major competitors. Our Celgar mill, located in Western Canada, is well situated to serve Asian and North American customers, specifically in China, which is the world’s largest and fastest-growing pulp import market. Our Stendal mill also supplies customers in China through its existing logistics arrangements. We primarily work directly with customers to capitalize on our geographic diversity, coordinate sales and enhance customer relationships. We believe our ability to deliver high qualityhigh-quality pulp on a timely basis and our customer service make us a preferred supplier for many customers.

Wood Products Segment

We manufacture, sell and distribute lumber, electricity and other wood residuals at the Friesau mill which produces lumber for European, U.S. and other lumber export markets.

FiberThe Friesau mill also expanded our biomass energy profile and provides synergies relating to the sharing of wood and biomass fuel resources and the optimization of staffing and services with our Rosenthal mill.

The European and U.S. lumber markets are very different. In the European market, lumber is generally customized in terms of dimensions and finishing, whereas the largestU.S. market is driven primarily by demand from new housing starts and dimensions and finishing are generally standardized.

Additionally, lumber production costand sales in manufacturing NBSK pulp. Although fiberEurope are commonly measured in cubic meters, whereas in the U.S. they are measured in thousand board feet or Mfbm.

The following table sets out our lumber production and revenues from April 12, 2017, being the date we acquired the Friesau mill, to December 31, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2018:

   December 31, 
         2018                 2017       

Lumber production (MMfbm)

   398.7      281.3 

Lumber sales (MMfbm)

   412.9      213.5 

Lumber revenues (in thousands)

    $    168,663       $    82,176 

The Friesau mill generates electricity for minimal incremental costs, all ofwhich is cyclical in bothsold,providing a stable revenue source unrelated to lumber prices. The Friesau mill’s modern biomass fueled cogeneration power plant has an annual production capacity of approximately 13 MW of electricity. The plant sells electricity pursuant to a long-term fixed price and supply, there is a significantgreen power tariff that runs to 2029.

The following table sets out the amount of high-quality fiber within a close radiussurplus energy we produced and sold and revenues from the sale of each ofsurplus energy by our mills. This fiber supply, combined with our purchasing power and our ability to switch between whole logs chipped at our mills and sawmill residual chips, enables us to enter into contracts and arrangements which have generally provided us with sufficient fiber supply.Friesau mill for the periods indicated.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (MWh)   ($)   (MWh)   ($) 
       (in thousands)       (in thousands) 

Surplus electricity

   86,325    10,831    73,698    8,872 

(6)


Corporate Structure, History and Development of Business

Mercer Inc. reorganized as a corporation under the laws of the State of Washington in 2006 from a Washington business trust. Its common stock is quoted and listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (MERC) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (MRI.U). As at December 31, 2015, we had 64,501,896 shares of common stock outstanding.

The following simplified chart sets out our principal operating subsidiaries, their jurisdictions of organization, their principal activities and their annual pulp productionor lumberproduction and electrical generation capacity:

 

LOGO

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC. Washington, U.S.A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Zellstoff-und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH Pulp production and sales Germany 360,000 ADMTs 57 MW Zellstoff Stendal GmbH Pulp production and sales Germany 660,000 ADMTs 148 MW Zellstoff Celgar Limited Partnership Pulp production and sales British Columbia, Canada 520,000 ADMTs 100 MW Mercer Timber Products GmbH Lumber production and sales Germany 550 MMfbm 13 MW Mercer Holz GmbH Wood procurement and logistics Germany Mercer Peace River Pulp Ltd.(1) Pulp production and sales British Columbia, Canada 645,000 ADMTs 93.5 MW

(1)

Acquired December 10, 2018, includes 170,000 ADMTs and 28.5 MW based on MPR’s 50% joint venture interest in CPP.

We entered into the pulp business in 1994 when we acquired our Rosenthal mill in 1994 and, inmill. In 1999, we completed a major capital project to convert it to the production of kraft pulp from sulphite pulp, increase its production capacity and improve efficiencies. The project cost approximately $385.7 million, of which approximately $100.8 million was financed through government grants.pulp. Subsequent capital investments and efficiency improvements have reduced emissions and energy costs, and increased the mill’s annual production capacity and enabled the production of tall oil.

In September 2004, we completed construction of the Stendal mill at a cost of approximately $1.1 billion, which was financed through a combination of government grants, of approximately $332.0 million, low-cost, long-term project debt which was largely severally guaranteed by governments in Germany, and equity. Subsequent capital investments and efficiency improvements have increased the mill’s annual production capacity and its generation of “green”green energy.

We initially had a 63.6% ownership interest in Stendal which increased over time through acquisitions and/or further investments to 83.0% in 2013. Inuntil September 2014, when we made an additional capital investment in Stendal and acquired all of the shareholder loans and substantially all of the shares of the minority shareholder in Stendal and other rights. As a result of such transactions, we now consolidate all of the economic interest in Stendal.

InWe expanded our pulp operations into Western Canada in February 2005 when we acquired the Celgar mill for $210.0 million plus defined working capital. The Celgar mill was completely rebuilt in the early 1990s through a C$850.0 million modernization and expansion project. Since its acquisition, we have effected several capital projects and other initiatives at the Celgar mill to increase its annual production capacity and its generation of “green”green energy.

In April 2017, we entered into the wood products segment when we acquired the Friesau mill for $61.6 million in cash.

In October 2018, we acquired the Santanol Group, which operates Indian sandalwood plantations and an oil extractives plant in Australia, for $35.7 million in cash.

In December 2018, we significantly expanded our pulp business when we acquired MPR for approximately $344.6 million in cash.

(7)


Corporate Strategy

Our corporate strategy is to expand our asset and earnings base through organic growth and acquisitions, primarily in Europe and North America. We pursue organic growth through active management and targeted capital expenditures to generate a high return by increasing pulp, energy and chemical production,improving efficiency, reducing costs and improving efficiency.increasing production of pulp, lumber, energy andby-products such as chemicals. We are also leveraging our fiber and process expertise to develop innovative new products based on other derivatives of the kraft pulping process.process and wood processing. We seek to acquire interests in companies and assets primarily in the pulp industryforest products business and related wood extractive businesses where we can leverage our experience and expertise in adding value through a focused management approach. Key elements of our strategy include:

 

 

 

Focus on Premium Grade Market NBSK Pulp. We produceOur principal product is market NBSK pulp, because itwhich is a premium grade kraft pulp and generally obtains the highest price relative to other kraft pulps. Although demand is cyclical, between 20062009 and 20152018 overall worldwide demand for bleached softwood kraft market pulp grew at an average of approximately 1%2% per annum. We focus on customers that produce tissue, specialty papers and high-quality printing and writing paper grades. We believe the growth in demand from tissue and specialty paper customers, which utilize a significant proportion of NBSK pulp, has more than offset the secular decline in demand from printing and writing paper customers. This allows us to benefit from our long-term relationships with tissue and specialty paper manufacturers in Europe and participate in higher growth markets in emerging countries such as China where there has been strong growth in tissue demand. Since the acquisition of MPR, we also produce NBHK pulp, which we believe is now undergoing similar market dynamics as NBSK pulp.

 

 

 

Increasing Stable Revenues from Renewable Energy and Chemical Sales and Leveraging our Fiber and Process Expertise to Expand Growth. We focus on enhancing our generation and sales of surplus renewable energy and chemicals and, because there are minimal associated incremental costs, such sales are highly profitable. These salesThe acquisition of the Friesau mill has allowed us to expand into the German lumber market and grow our biomass energy profile.Sales of surplus renewable energy and chemicals provide us with a stable income source unrelated to cyclical changes in pulp prices.and lumberprices. Additionally, we seek to capitalize on our fiber and process expertise to expand our commercialization and sales of new products and into new growth areas.

 

 

 

Targeted Capital Expenditures to Enhance Production Capacity and Efficiency. We currently operate threefour large modern pulp mills whichand the Friesau mill. These provide us with a platform to be an efficient and competitive producer of high-quality NBSKkraft pulp withoutand lumberwithout the need for significant sustaining capital. We seek to make targeted capital expenditures to increase production and operational efficiency, reduce costs and increase electricity and chemical sales. Over the last five years,Between 2014 and 2018, we have invested approximately $180.3$183 million (including $41.0$7.6 million in associated government grants) in growth capital expenditures for capacity expansions, operational efficiencies and renewable energy and chemical production.

 

 

 

Achieving Operational Excellence. Operating our mills reliably and at a competitive cost is important for our financial performance. In addition to capital expenditures, we continuously strive to develop maintenance systems and procedures that will improve the throughput of our products by increasing the reliability of our manufacturing processes.

(8)


We also seek to reduce operating costs by better managing certain operating activities such

as fiber procurement, sales, marketing and logistics activities. We believe that our continued focus on operational excellence should allow us to achieve improved profitability and cash flows.

 

 

 

Strategic Opportunities. We believe there will be continuing change and consolidation in ourthe forest products business, including pulp, lumber and related wood plantations and harvesting, processing and extractive businesses as industry participants continually seek to lower costs, refocus their product lines and react to ever changing global market conditions. We take an opportunistic approach to potential investments or acquisitions that can grow our business and expand our earnings.

The Pulp Industry

General

Pulp is used in the production of paper, tissues and paper-related products. Pulp is generally classified according to fiber type, the process used in its production and the degree to which it is bleached. Kraft pulp, a type of chemical pulp, is produced through a sulphate chemical process in which lignin, the component of wood which binds individual fibers, is dissolved in a chemical reaction. Chemically prepared pulp allows the wood’s fiber to retain its length and flexibility, resulting in stronger paper products. Kraft pulp can be bleached to increase its brightness. KraftSoftwood kraft pulp is noted for its strength, brightness and absorption properties and is used to produce a variety of products, including lightweight publication grades of paper, tissues and other paper-related products.

There are two main types of bleached kraft pulp, being softwood kraft made from coniferous trees and hardwood kraft made from deciduous trees. Softwood species generally have long, flexible fibers which add strength to paper while fibers from species of hardwood contain shorter fibers which lend bulk and opacity.

We primarily produce and sell NBSK pulp, which is a bleached kraft pulp manufactured using northern softwood and is considered a premium grade because of its strength. It generally obtains the highest price relative to other kraft pulps. Southern bleached softwood kraft pulp is kraft pulp manufactured using southern softwood and does not possess

Prior to our recent acquisition of the strength found in NBSK pulp.Peace River mill, NBSK pulp iswas the sole pulp product of our mills. The Peace River mill is a “swing mill” as it produces both NBSK and NBHK pulp. Generally, approximately 37% of the Peace River mill’s production is NBSK and 63% is NBHK. The mill expands our product offering and its swing capabilities allow us to adjust our production mix to respond to market developments and take advantage of pricing differentials between NBSK and NBHK.

Most paper users of market kraft pulp use a mix of softwood and hardwood grades to optimize production and product qualities. In 2015,2018, market kraft pulp consumption was approximately 54%56% hardwood bleached kraft and 43%41% softwood bleached kraft, with the remainder comprised of unbleached pulp. Over the last several years, production of hardwood pulp, based on fast growing plantation fiber primarily from Asia and South America, has increased much more rapidly than that of softwood grades, based on fiber that has longer growth cycles. Hardwood kraft generally has a cost advantage over softwood kraft as a result of lower fiber costs, higher wood yields and, for newer hardwood mills, economies of scale. As a result of this growth in supply and lower costs, kraft pulp customers have substituted some of the pulp content in their products to hardwood pulp.

(9)


Counteracting customers’ ability to substitute lower priced hardwood pulp for NBSK pulp is the requirement for strength and formation characteristics in finished goods. Paper and tissue makers focus on larger paper machines with higher speeds and lower basis weights for certain papers which require the strength characteristics of softwood pulp. Additionally, where paper products are lightweight or specialized, like direct mail, magazine paper or premium tissue, or where strength or absorbency are important, softwood kraft forms a significant proportion of the fiber used. As a result, we believe that the ability of kraft pulp users to further substitute hardwood for softwood pulp is limited by such requirements.

Kraft pulp can be made in different grades, with varying technical specifications, for different end uses. KraftSoftwood kraft pulp is valued for its reinforcing role in mechanical printing papers and is sought after by producers of paper for the publishing industry, primarily for magazines and advertising materials. KraftSoftwood kraft pulp is also an important ingredient for tissue manufacturing and tissue demand tends to increase with living standards in developing countries. KraftNBSK pulp produced for reinforcement fibers is considered the highest grade of kraft pulp and generally obtains the highest price.

Markets

We believe that over 130140 million ADMTs of chemical pulp are converted annually into tissues, printing and writing papers, carton boards and other specialty grades of paper and paperboard around the world. We also believe that over one thirdapproximately 45% of this pulp is sold on the open market as market pulp, while the remainder is produced for internal purposes by integrated paper and paperboard manufacturers.

The pulp business is highly cyclical in nature and markets are characterized by periods of supply and demand imbalance, which in turn affect prices. Pulp markets are highly competitive and are sensitive to cyclical changes in the global economy, industry capacity and foreign exchange rates, all of which can have a significant influence on selling prices and our operating results. The length and magnitude of industry cycles have varied over time but generally reflect changes in macro-economic conditions and levels of industry capacity. Pulp is a commodity that is generally available from other producers. Because commodity products have few distinguishing qualities from producer to producer, competition is generally based upon price, which is generally determined by supply relative to demand.

Between 20062009 and 2015,2018, worldwide demand for chemical market pulp grew at an average rate of approximately 2% annually, with worldwide demand for bleached softwood kraft market pulp having grown at an average of approximately 1%2% per annum.

(10)


The following chart illustrates the global demand for chemical market pulp for the periods indicated:

Estimated Global Chemical Market Pulp Demand

 

LOGO

Two keyOver the last several years, macro-economic trends inaffecting worldwide NBSK pulp demand over the last several years have been:include:

 

a significant increase in demand from emerging markets, and in particular China, which has more than offset a decline indeclining and stagnating demand in the mature markets of Europe, North America and Japan; and

 

a significant shift in demand by end use, as demand from tissue and specialty producers has increased markedly and offset the secular decline in demand for printing and writing paper resulting from the rapid growth in digital media.

Since 2006,Over the last ten years, demand for chemical softwood market pulp has grown in the emerging markets of Asia, particularly China and Eastern Europe and Latin America.Europe. In China, in particular has experienced substantial growth and its imports of chemical softwood market pulp grew by approximately 12%6% per annum between 20062009 and 2015.2018. We believe the emerging markets now account for approximately 52%55% of total world demand. China now accountsdemand for approximately 30% of global bleached softwood kraft market pulp demand, compared to only 13% in 2006. Western Europe currentlyand China itself now accounts for approximately 26%32% of global bleached softwood kraft market pulp demand compared to approximately 36%23% in 2006. The2009. Western Europe currently accounts for approximately 24% of global bleached softwood kraft market pulp demand compared to approximately 30% in the mature markets of Europe, North America and Japan in 2015 declined by approximately 2.9 million ADMTs from 2006.2009.

(11)


The following chart sets forth industry-wide bleached softwood kraft deliveries to China for the periods indicated:

12 Month Rolling Bleached Softwood Kraft Pulp Deliveries to China

 

LOGO

Growth in NBSK pulp demand in China and other emerging markets has to a large extent, been primarily driven by increased demand from tissue and specialty paper producers, as a result of economic growth and rising income levels and living standards in such markets. These factors generally contribute to a greater demand for personal hygiene products in such regions. In China alone, tissue producers have publicly announced plans to increase their annual tissueproduction capacity has increased by approximately 1.05.6 million ADMTs during 2016. At this time there can be no assurance as to when and how much of such capacity expansion will be implemented.over the last five years.

This has also led to an overall shift in demand for NBSK pulp, as demand from tissue producers has increased, while demand from printing and writing end uses has decreased. Between 2003 and 2013, NBSK pulp demand for tissue production increased by approximately 168%, an approximate 10% compound annual growth rate. From 2006 to 2014, a period very affected by “digital substitution” of traditional paper grades, total NBSK demand grew by 3%.

The following chart compares worldwide NBSK pulp demand by end use in each of 2003 and 20132017 (the latest year for which figures are currently available).:

NBSK Pulp Demand by End Use

 

 

LOGO

We believe 2014 and 20152018 NBSK demand by end use was generally consistent with the trend in the chart above.

(12)


A measure of demand for kraft pulp is the ratio obtained by dividing the worldwide demand of kraft pulp by the worldwide capacity for the production of kraft pulp, or the “demand/capacity ratio”. An increase in this ratio generally occurs when there is an increase in global and regional levels of economic activity. An increase in this ratio also generally indicates greater demand as consumption increases, which often results in rising kraft pulp prices and a reduction of inventories by producers and buyers. As prices continue to rise, producers continue to run at higher operating rates. However, an adverse change in global and regional levels of economic activity generally negatively affects demand for kraft pulp, often leading buyers to reduce their purchases and rely on existing pulp inventories. As a result, producers run at lower operating rates by taking downtime to limit thebuild-up of their own inventories. The demand/capacity ratio for bleached softwood kraft pulp was approximately 92%89%, 93% and 94%92% in 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

Between 20112013 and 2015,2018, we believe approximately 0.80.5 million ADMTs of pulp capacity was idled or shut down through mill closures or curtailments. Further, in efforts to improve environmental and safety standards, China has publicly stated that itclosed “old” mills and removed about 15.6 million ADMTs.

In 2018, chemical pulp capacity increased by approximately 0.9 million ADMTs, consisting entirely of softwood kraft pulp. Currently, we are not aware of any material announced capacity increases of NBSK or NBHK pulp in 2019. However, we cannot predict whether new capacity will be reducing existing pulp and paper capacityannounced or may come online in the near term by closing “old” mills, targeting a removal of 3.4 million ADMTs by the end of 2015. At this time,future. As pulp prices are highly cyclical, there can be no certaintyassurance that pulp prices will not decline in the future as a result of increases to the actual amount and timing of any such closures.

Producers have publicly announced plans to expand the global supply of bleached hardwood kraft pulp in the 2016 and 2017 period by about 3.6 million ADMTs, primarily from South America and Asia. Further capacity increases of about 2.7 million ADMTs have been announced for 2018. We cannot ascertain with any certainty how much such capacity increases will be actually realized, given capital, fiber and other restraints. This increase in bleached hardwood kraft pulp is largely targeted at the growing demand for pulp in developing markets, particularly in China, by producers of tissues, specialty papers and packaging. Althoughpulp. While not a direct competitor to NBSK pulp, if such additional bleached hardwood kraft pulpany future increases of NBHK supply isare not absorbed by such demand growth, as a result of generally lower prices for bleached hardwood kraft

pulp, thissuch supply increase could put downward pressure on NBSK pulp prices. However, we believe customers’ ability to further substitute lower priced bleached hardwood kraft pulp for NBSK pulp is limited by the strength characteristic of NBSK pulp which is required by large modern paper machines to run lower basis-weight paper products efficiently.

Producers have also publicly announced modernization and expansion projects for NBSK mills in Europe, including Russia, to be implemented in 2016 and 2017, ranging from small expansions of existing mills to potential “greenfield” mills. We estimate that if all of these projects were completed, they would increase NBSK pulp capacity by about 1.1 million ADMTs per annum. Further capacity increases of about 0.9 million ADMTs of NBSK pulp have been announced for 2018. We currently believe a number of the projects announced for 2016 and 2017 will be implemented while others are currently subject to various conditions including financing and further development. We believe that, because of fiber constraints, such a significant expansion of NBSK capacity in the region would likely require the closure of older mills. However, at this time, we cannot predict which of the publicly announced expansion projects will be completed or how much additional NBSK pulp production capacity may come online and when. As pulp prices are highly cyclical, there can be no assurance that NBSK pulp prices will not decline in the future as a result of increases to the supply of kraft pulp.

In addition, certain integrated pulp and paper producers have the ability to discontinue paper production by idling their paper machines and selling their NBSK pulp production on the market, if market conditions, prices and trends warrant such actions.

NBSK Pulp Pricing

Kraft pulp is a globally traded commodity and prices are highly cyclical and volatile. Kraft pulp prices are generally quoted in U.S. dollars. Pricing is primarily influenced by the balance between supply and demand, as affected by global macroeconomicmacro-economic conditions, changes in consumption and capacity, the level of customer and producer inventories and fluctuations in exchange rates. Generally, we and other producers consider global NBSK pulp supply and demand to be evenly balanced when world inventory levels are at about 30 days’ supply.

General macroeconomicmacro-economic conditions are closely tied to overall global business activity, which helps determine pulp demand and, in turn, impacts pricing.

As the majority of market NBSK pulp is produced and sold by Canadian and Northern European producers, while the price of NBSK pulp is generally quoted in U.S. dollars, pricing is often affected by fluctuations in the currency exchange rates for the U.S. dollar versus the euro and the Canadian dollar. As NBSK pulp producers generally incur costs in their local currency, while pulp is quoted in U.S. dollars, a U.S. dollar strengthening generally benefits producers’ businesses and operating margins. Conversely, a weakening of the U.S. dollar versus the local currency of producers generally adversely affects producers’ businesses and operating margins.

(13)


As a corollary to changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the euro and Canadian dollar, a stronger U.S. dollar generally increases costs to customers of NBSK pulp producers and results in downward pressure on prices. Conversely, a weakening U.S. dollar generally supports higher pulp pricing. However, there is invariably a time lag between changes in currency exchange rates and pulp prices. This lag can vary and is not predictable with any certainty.

As Northern Europe has historically been the world’s largest market and NBSK pulp is the premium grade, the European market NBSK price is generally used as a benchmark price by the industry. The average European list prices for NBSK pulp since 20062009 have fluctuated between a low of approximately $575 per ADMT in 2009 and a high of $1,030$1,230 per ADMT in 2011.2018.

The following chart sets out the changes in list prices for NBSK pulp in Europe, as stated in U.S. dollars, Canadian dollars and euros for the periods indicated:

NBSK Pulp Price History (European Delivery)

 

In 2013, demand from China was stable throughout the year and supply was slightly under-balanced, which resulted in higher year-end list prices. In 2014, demand from both Europe and China was stable, while supply was slightly under-balanced throughout the year which kept prices relatively high. In 2015, demand was generally stable. However, the strength of the dollar resulted in lower pulp prices.LOGO

The following table sets out list prices for NBSK pulp in the regions indicated at the dates indicated:

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
      2015           2014           2013           2018           2017           2016     
  (in $/ADMT)   ($/ADMT) 

Europe

   800     935     905     1,185    1,030    810 

China

   595     700     750     725    890    605 

North America

   940     1,020     990     1,430    1,205    990 

A producer’s net sales realizations are list prices, net of customer discounts, commissionsrebates and other selling concessions. While there are differences between NBSK list prices in Europe, North AmericaOver the last three years, these have increased as producers compete for customers and Asia, European prices are generally regarded as the global benchmark and pricing in other regions tends to follow European trends.sales. The nature of the pricing structure in Asia is different in that, while quoted list prices tend to be lower than Europe, customer discounts and rebates are much lower, resulting in net sales realizations that are generally similar to other markets.

(14)


The following chart sets forth changes in FOEX PIX Pulp Index prices for NBSK pulp in Europe and global bleached softwood kraft inventory levels between 20032005 and 2015:2018:

Pulp Price and Global Inventory History

 

LOGO

Seasonality

We are exposed to fluctuations in quarterly sales volumes and expenses due to seasonal factors. These factors are common in the NBSKkraft pulp industry. We generally have weaker pulp demand in Europe during the summer holiday months and in China in the period relating to its lunar new year. We typically have a seasonalbuild-up in raw material inventories in the early winter months as our mills build up their fiber supply for the winter when there is reduced availability.

Competition

Pulp markets are large and highly competitive. Producers ranging from small independent manufacturers to large integrated companies produce pulp worldwide. Our pulp and customer services compete with similar products manufactured and distributed by others. While many factors influence our competitive position, particularly in weak economic times, a key factor is price. Other factors include service, quality and convenience of location. Some of our competitors are larger than we are in certain markets and have substantially greater financial resources. These resources may afford those competitors more purchasing power, increased financial flexibility, more capital resources for expansion and improvement and enable them to compete more effectively. Our key NBSK pulp competitors are principally located in Northern Europe and Canada and include Canfor Pulp, Stora Enso, Metsä Fibre, Ilim, Södra Cell and Asia Pulp and Paper.

(15)


Pulp Production

We manufacture and sell NBSK pulp produced from wood chips and pulp logs at our three mills.

The following table sets out ourOur pulp production capacity and actual production by mill for the periods indicated:indicated is set out below:

 

  Annual
Production
    Capacity(1)     
   Year Ended December 31,   Annual
    Production    
Capacity(1)
   Year Ended December 31, 
  2015   2014   2013       2018(2)           2017           2016     

Pulp Production by Mill:

      (ADMTs) 
Pulp Production by Mill:      (ADMTs) 

Rosenthal

   360,000     353,099     360,463     361,724     360,000    351,566    361,309    353,486 

Stendal

   660,000    636,863    679,152    648,581 

Celgar

   520,000     453,215     453,104     447,935     520,000    442,620    466,558    426,317 

Stendal

            660,000     651,659     671,444     634,816  

Peace River

   475,000    30,438     

Cariboo(3)

   170,000    11,103     
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total pulp production

         1,540,000       1,457,973       1,485,011       1,444,475      2,185,000     1,472,590     1,507,019     1,428,384 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Capacity is the rated capacity of the plants for the year ended December 31, 2015.2018.

(2)

Includes results from December 10, 2018 of MPR and MPR’s 50% joint venture interest in CPP.

(3)

MPR’s 50% joint venture interest in CPP.

Softwood kraft pulp is valued for its reinforcing role in mechanical printing papers and is sought after by producers of paper for the publishing industry, primarily for magazines and advertising materials. Softwood kraft pulp is also an important ingredient for tissue manufacturing, and tissue demand tends to increase with living standards in developing countries. NBHK provides bulk and opacity for customers.

The kraftNBSK pulp produced at the Rosenthal mill is a long-fibered softwood pulp produced by a sulphate cooking process and manufactured primarily from wood chips and pulp logs. A number of factors beyond economic supply and demand have an impact on the market for chemical pulp, including requirements for pulp bleached without any chlorine compounds or without the use of chlorine gas. The Rosenthal mill has the capability of producing both “totally chlorine free” and “elemental chlorine free” pulp. Totally chlorine free pulp is bleached to a high brightness using oxygen, ozone and hydrogen peroxide as bleaching agents, whereas elemental chlorine free pulp is produced by substituting chlorine dioxide for chlorine gas in the bleaching process. This substitution virtually eliminates complex chloro-organic compounds from the mill’s effluent. The Rosenthal mill produces pulp for reinforcement fibers to the specifications of certain of our customers. We believe that a number of our customers consider us their supplier of choice.

The kraftNBSK pulp produced at the Stendal mill is of a slightly different grade than the pulp produced at the Rosenthal mill as the mix of softwood fiber used is slightly different. This results in a complementary product more suitable for different end uses. The Stendal mill is capable of producing both totally chlorine free and elemental chlorine free pulp.

The Celgar mill produces high-quality kraftNBSK pulp that is made from a unique blend of slow growing/long-fiber Western Canadian tree species. It is used in the manufacture of high-quality paper and tissue products. We believe the Celgar mill’s pulp is known for its excellent product characteristics, including tensile strength, wet strength and brightness. The Celgar mill is a long-established supplier to paper and tissue producers in Asia.

The Peace River mill produces NBHK, NBSK and a small amount of “transitional” pulp, a lower grade pulp that is produced during the period when the mill transitions between NBSK and NBHK pulp.

Generation and Sales of “Green”Green Energy and Chemicals at ourOur Mills

Our pulp mills are large scalebio-refineries that, in addition to pulp, also produce surplus “carbon neutral” or “green”green energy. As part of the pulp production process our mills generate “green”green energy using carbon-neutral carbon neutralbio-fuels such as black liquor and wood waste. Through the incineration ofbio-fuels in the

(16)


recovery and power boilers, our mills produce sufficient steam to cover all of our steam requirements and allow us to produce surplus electricity which we sell to third party utilities.third-party utilities and, in the case of the Peace River mill, into the regional electricity market. As a result, we have benefited from “green”green energy legislation, incentives and commercialization that have developed over the last decade in Europe and Canada. In addition, in recent years we have applied considerable resources to increasing our capacity to produce and sell chemicals, primarily tall oil for use in numerous applications includingbio-fuels.

Our Friesau mill also generates and sells green energy produced from its biomass cogeneration power plant.

Our surplus energy and chemical sales provide our millsus with a new stable revenue source unrelated to pulp or lumber prices. Since our energy and chemical production areby-products of our pulp production

process, processes, there are minimal incremental costs and our surplus energy and chemical sales are highly profitable. We believe that this revenue source gives our mills a competitive advantage over other older mills which do not have the equipment or capacity to produce and/or sell surplus power and/or chemicals in a meaningful amount.

In December 2013, we completed a $49.3 million capital project at our Stendal mill, referred to as “Project Blue Mill”, to increase production and efficiency through debottlenecking initiatives including the installation of an additional 46 MW steam turbine at the mill. The debottlenecking which, among other things, required a new turbine in order to enhance and efficiently utilize steam production was designed to increase the mill’s annual pulp production capacity by 30,000 ADMTs. The new turbine permits the mill to produce an additional 109,000 MWh annually of surplus renewable energy for sale at premium pricing.

In September 2010, we completed a $60.6 million capital project at our Celgar mill, referred to as the “Celgar Energy Project”, to increase the production of “green” energy and optimize its power generation capacity. Approximately $44.6 million of the project cost was financed by grants from the Canadian federal government. The project included the installation of a 48 MW condensing turbine which increased the mill’s installed generating capacity to 100 MW and upgraded its bark boiler and steam consuming facilities.

The following table sets out our electricity generation and surplus electricity sales for the five years ended December 31, 2015:2018:

Electricity Generation and Exports

 

LOGO

1.5 million tonnes Pulp Production & 398.7 MMfbm Lumber Production 1.5 million tonnes Pulp Production & 281.3 MMfbm Lumber Production 1.4 million tonnes Pulp Production 1.5 million tonnes Pulp Production 1.5 million tonnes Pulp Production

(1)

Includes results of MPR from December 10, 2018. Does not include electrical generation and exports of our 50% joint venture interest in CPP, which is accounted for using the equity method.

(17)


The following chart sets forth our consolidated revenues from electricity and chemical sales for the five years ended December 31, 2015:2018:

Energy and Chemical Revenue

 

LOGO

(1)

Includes results of MPR from December 10, 2018. Does not include energy revenues of our 50% joint venture interest in CPP, which is accounted for using the equity method.

German Pulp Mills and Friesau Mill

Our German pulp mills and the Friesau mill participate in a program established pursuant to the Renewable Energy Act, which requires that public electric utilities give priority to electricity produced from renewable energy sources by independent power producers and pay a fixed tariff for such electricity for a period of 20 years. SuchCurrently we expect such tariff expiresto expire on December 31, 20192020 for our Rosenthal mill, and December 31, 2024 for our Stendal mill and in 2029 for the Friesau mill. Under the program, our German mills now sell their surplus energyRecent amendments to the local electricity grid at the rates stipulated by the Renewable Energy Act will extend the initial terms for biomass energy.

Since 2005, our Germanpulp mills have also benefited fromfor a further10-year period, based upon the saleprice received in the last year prior to renewal, regressing at a rate of emission allowances under the8% per annum. Such amendments are subject to compliance with European Union, Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme, referred to as the “EU ETS”. However, our eligibility“EU”, state aid rules. While we expect them to be effective, we can provide no assurance that the current proposed amendments will be implemented or when.

In 2018, energy sales for special tariffs under the Renewable Energy Act has reduced the amount of emissions allowances granted to our German pulp mills underand the EU ETS.Friesau mill were $64.0 million or 582,728 MWh.

In 2015, our Rosenthal and Stendal mills sold approximately 165,852 MWh and 500,050 MWh of electricity, respectively, for proceeds of $16.8 million and $46.7 million, respectively.

In 2015,2018, our Rosenthal and Stendal mills generated $2.3$14.4 million and $9.4 million, respectively, from the sale of tall oil, aby-product of our production process. In 2014, our Rosenthal mill completed a capital project which allowed it to process, and sell tall oil. We currently expect tall oil sales to increase in the future.other chemicals.

Celgar MillCanadian Pulp Mills

The Celgar mill has an electricity sales agreement with the British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, referred to as “B.C. Hydro”, for the sale of power generated, pursuant to which the mill agreed to supply a minimum of approximately 238,000 MWh of surplus electrical energy annually to the utility over aten-year term. The agreement expires in 2020.

(18)


In 2015,2018, our Celgar mill sold approximately 149,064115,463 MWh of renewable electricity for proceeds of approximately $11.2$9.9 million.

In 2012, we initiatedThe Peace River mill has an annual production capacity of approximately 65 MW of electrical generation. The mill’s surplus electricity is sold into the Alberta market.

The Cariboo mill has two generators, only one of which is used for pulp production. The other generator produces and sells electricity to B.C. Hydro at a claim againstfixed rate pursuant to a long-term electricity purchase agreement that runs until December 2022 and may be extended for an additionalten-year term at the Government of Canada under the North American Free Trade Agreement, referred to as “NAFTA”, relating to our investment in Celgar and unfair and discriminatory treatment regarding its ability to purchase and sell energy. See Item 3. “Legal Proceedings”.

In 2015, our Celgar mill’s energy costs benefited from a recovery of $6.1 million as a result of a successful appeal before the British Columbia Utilities Commission of certain elementsoption of the mill’s energy purchase agreement.joint venture.

Cash Production Costs

ConsolidatedThe following table sets forth our consolidated cash production costs and cash production costs per ADMT for our pulp mills are set outsegment, and a reconciliation of such amounts to cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization, as presented in the following tableour consolidated financial statements, for the periods indicated:

 

  Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
  2015   2014   2013  2018(1) 2017 2016 

Cash Production Costs

  (per ADMT)   (%)   (per ADMT)   (%)   (per ADMT)   (%) 
 (in thousands) (per ADMT)(2) (in thousands) (per ADMT)(2) (in thousands) (per ADMT)(2) 

Fiber

  $286     62    $332     62    $356     62   $452,878  $        307  $  399,013  $265  $  376,839  $264 

Labor

   51     11     58     11     62     11   89,740  61  80,650(3)   54  73,486(3)   51 

Chemicals

   51     11     59     11     63     11   89,395  61  80,541  53  72,188  51 

Energy

   18     4     29     5     32     5   38,579  26  29,609  20  28,396  20 

Other

   59     12     57     11     64     11   127,706  87  116,997  78  77,093  54 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total cash production costs(1)

  $      465             100    $      535             100    $      577             100  
Pulp segment cash production costs(4) 798,298  $        542  706,810  $        469  628,002  $        440 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
Pulp segment other direct costs(5) 68,730   78,218   71,356  
 

 

   

 

   

 

  
Pulp segment cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization 867,028   785,028   699,358  
Wood products segment and corporate and other cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization 183,610   93,130   1,136  

Intercompany eliminations

 (18,537  (12,139   -  
 

 

   

 

   

 

  
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization $1,032,101   $866,019   $700,494  
 

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

(1)

(1)Includes MPR from December 10, 2018.

(2)

Cash production costs per ADMT excludesare cash production costs divided by pulp production for the year.

(3)

Adjusted as a result of our adoption of Accounting Standards Update2017-07,Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-Retirement Benefit Cost, in the current year.See Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4)

Cash production costs exclude depreciation and amortization.

(5)

Other direct costs primarily consist of freight and the net change in finished goods inventory.

Production Costs

Our major costs of pulp production are fiber, labor, energychemicals and chemicals.energy. Fiber, comprised of wood chips and pulp logs, is our most significant operating expense for our pulp segment, representing about 62%57% of our pulp cash production costs in 2018.

Further, fiber, in the form of sawlogs, represents about 80% of lumber cash production costs.

(19)


Given the significance of fiber to our total operating expenses and our limited ability to control its costs,cost compared with our other operating costs, volatility in fiber costs can materially affect our margins and results of operations.

Fiber

Our mills are situated in regions which generally provide a relatively stable supply of fiber. The fiber consumed by our pulp mills consists of wood chips produced by sawmills as aby-product of the sawmilling process and pulp logs. Wood chips are small pieces of wood used to make pulp and are either wood residuals from the sawmilling process or pulp logs chipped especially for this purpose. Pulp logs consist of lower quality logs not used in the production of lumber. Wood chipsThe Friesau mill consumes sawlogs and pulp logswaste wood, which are cyclical in both price and supply.

Generally, the cost of wood chips, and pulp logs and sawlogs is primarily affected by the supply and demand for lumber. Additionally, regional factors such as harvesting levels and weather conditions can also have a material effect on the supply, demand and price for fiber.

In Germany, the price and supply of wood chips has been affected by increasing demand from alternative or renewable energy producers and government initiatives for carbon neutral energy. Declining

energy prices, weaker economies or periodically warm winters such as in 2014 and 2015 tempered the demand for wood chips resulting from initiatives by European governments to promote the use of wood as a carbon neutral energy. Over the long-term, we expect this There can be no assurance that suchnon-traditional demand for fiber is likely to continue to increase.

In August 2012, Russia enteredwill remain strong in the World Trade Organization and, as a result, lowered its export tariffs for pine and spruce to 15% and 13%, respectively, which we believe has had a positive impact on European fiber supply.long-term.

During the past few years, certain customers have endeavored to purchase pulp that is produced using fiber that meets certain recognized wood certification requirements from forest certification agencies like FSC, PEFC, SFI-CSA.the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC), the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) and the Canadian Standards Association (CSA). If the fiber we purchase does not meet certain wood certifications required by customers, it may make it more difficult or prevent us from selling our pulp to such customers. The chain of custody wood certification process is a voluntary process which allows a company to demonstrate that they use forest resources in accordance with strict principles and standards in the areas of sustainable forest management practices and environmental management. In an effort to procure wood only from sustainably managed sources, we employ an FSC Chain of Custody protocol for controlled wood and PEFC certification, which requires tracking of fiber origins and preparing risk based assessments regarding the region and operator. In the areas where we operate, we are actively engaged in the further development of certification processes. AlthoughHowever, there is competition among private certification systems along with efforts by supporters to further these systems by having customers of forest products require products to be certified to their preferred system. Such wood certification requirementsstandards continue to evolve and are not consistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction weor how they are interpreted and applied. We currently do not expect certification requirements to have a material adverse impact on our fiber procurement and pulp sales. However, if sufficient marketplace demand requires wood raw materials to be sourced from standards that are inconsistent with those in our fiber supply regions, it could increase our operating costs and available harvest levels.

Offsetting some of the increases in demand for wood fiber have been initiatives to increase harvest levels in Germany, particularly from small private forest owners. We believe that Germany has the highest availability of softwood forests in Europe suitable for harvesting and manufacturing. We believe private ownership of such forests is approximately 48%. Many of these forest ownership stakes are very small and have been harvested at rates much lower than their rate of growth.

In 2013,2018, our per unit fiber prices in Germany increased by approximately 13%, mainly due to strong demand from the European board producers and sawmills, along with the increased demand for pellets due to an unusually cold winter. In addition to increased demand, high snow levels and summer floods in some areas in which we operate led to lower fiber supply levels during much of 2013. In 2014, our per unitpulp fiber costs in Germany decreased by approximately 6% dueincreased compared to sawmills running at high rates,2017, primarily as a stronger supplyresult of logs and lowerstrong demand from pellet producers and board manufacturers.for wood in our German mills’ procurement areas. In 2015,2017, our per unit pulp fiber costs in Germany decreased by approximately 17% duewere flat compared to the strength of the U.S. dollar. In 2015, in local currency terms, average fiber prices in Germany were marginally lower2016, primarily as a result of a generally balanced wood market.market in Germany.

(20)


We believe we are the largest consumer of wood chips and pulp logs in Germany and often provide the best long-term economic outlet for the sale of wood chips in Eastern Germany. We coordinate the wood procurement activities for our German mills to reduce overall personnel and administrative costs, provide greater purchasing power and coordinate buying and trading activities. This coordination and integration of fiber flows also allows us to optimize transportation costs, and the species and fiber mix for both mills. In addition, in 2016, we entered into a joint wood purchasing arrangement with another significant wood consumer in Europe, being the Mondi Group.

In 2015,2018, the Rosenthal mill consumed approximately 1.8 million cubic meters of fiber. Approximately 64%66% of such consumption was in the form of sawmill wood chips and approximately 36%34% was in the form of pulp logs. The wood chips for the Rosenthal mill are sourced from approximately 3433 sawmills located primarily in the states of Bavaria,Baden-Württemberg and Thüringia and areprimarily within a 300 kilometer radius of the Rosenthal mill. Within this radius, the Rosenthal mill is the largest consumer of wood chips. Given its location and size, the Rosenthal mill is often the best economic outlet for the sale of wood chips in the area. Approximately 63%In 2018, approximately 78% of the fiber consumed by the Rosenthal mill iswas spruce and the remainder iswas pine. While fiber costs and supply are subject to cyclical changes largely in the sawmill

industry, we expect that we will be able to continue to obtain an adequate supply of fiber on reasonably satisfactory terms for the Rosenthal mill due to its location and our long-term relationships with suppliers. We have not historically experienced any significant fiber supply interruptions at the Rosenthal mill.

Wood chips for the Rosenthal mill are normally sourced from sawmills underone-year contracts with quarterly adjustments for market pricing. Substantially all of our chip supply is sourced from suppliers with which we have long-standing relationships. Pulp logs are sourced from the state forest agencies in Thüringia, Saxony and Bavaria and from private and municipal forest owners. In addition, the Rosenthal mill buys relevant volumes from traders and via imports from the Czech Republic and Poland.

In 2015,2018, the Stendal mill consumed approximately 3.33.2 million cubic meters of fiber. Approximately 27%28% of such fiber was in the form of sawmill wood chips and approximately 73%72% was in the form of pulp logs. The core wood supply region for the Stendal mill includes most of the NorthernNortheastern and Western part of Germany primarily within an approximate 300 kilometer radius of the mill. We also purchase wood chips from Southwestern and Southern Germany.Germany as well as the Baltic Sea region. The fiber consumed by the Stendal mill consisted of approximately 41%61% pine, 57%38% spruce and 2%1% other species in 2015.2018. The Stendal mill has sufficient chipping capacity to fully operate solely using pulp logs, if required. We source pulp logs from private forest holders, municipal forest owners and from state forest agencies inSaxony-Anhalt, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Saxony, Lower Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia, Hesse, Brandenburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Rhineland PalatinateRhineland-Palatinate and the City of Berlin. The volumes are distributed at optimal costs between the mills. In addition, over the last three years, the Stendal mill also imported fiber from Poland and the Baltic Sea region.

The availability of fiber for the Celgar mill is in large part influenced by the strength of the lumber market. Lumber markets are primarily driven by U.S. housing starts and, to a lesser degree, demand from China.

In 2015,2018, our Celgar mill’s per unit fiber costs increased compared to 2017, due to strong demand from coastal pulp mills and limited pulp log availability. In 2017, our Celgar mill’s per unit fiber costs were flat compared to 2016, due to a balanced wood market in the Celgar mill’s fiber basket.

In 2018, the Celgar mill consumed approximately 2.4 million cubic meters of fiber. Approximately 69% of such fiber was in the form of sawmill wood chips and the remaining 31% came from pulp logs

(21)


processed through its woodroom or chipped by a third party.third-party. Celgar’s woodroom is able to process about 40% of the mill’s fiber needs. The source of fiber at the mill is characterized by a mixture of species (pine, douglas fir, hemlock, cedar and spruce) and the mill sources fiber from a number of Canadian and U.S. suppliers.

The availability of fiber forIn 2018, the Celgar mill is in large part influenced by the strength of the lumber market. Lumber markets are primarily driven by U.S. housing starts and, to a lesser degree, demand from China.

The Celgar mill hashad access to approximately 3324 different chip suppliers from Canada and the U.S., representing approximately 69% of its total annual fiber requirements. The Celgar mill’s woodroom and third party chippers supplied the remaining 31% of the mill’s fiber requirements in 2015.United States. Chips are purchased in Canada and the U.S.United States in accordance with chip purchase agreements. Generally, pricing is reviewed and adjusted periodically to reflect market prices. One of the longer-term contracts is aso-called “evergreen” agreement, where the contract remains in effect until one of the parties elects to terminate after providing the stipulated notice. All other contracts are generally for one year with quarterly adjustments or on three-month terms.

To secure the volume of pulp logs required by its woodroom and field chippers, the Celgar mill has entered into pulp log supply agreements, which can range from three-month toone-year terms, with a number of different suppliers, many of whom are also contract chip suppliers to the mill. All of the pulp log agreements can be terminated by either party for any reason, upon seven days’ written notice. The Celgar mill also purchased two non-renewable licenses at a cost of $1.3 million, which will provide saw logs to sawmills in the area and pulp logs for the Celgar mill to use. The Celgar mill also bids on British Columbia timber sales from time to time.

The Celgar mill has also commenced a pulp pricing and education process with certain licensees and contractors in most locales to increase harvesting of pulp logs that have traditionally been left as waste after harvesting operations.

In 2015, our Celgar mill’s per unit fiber costsMPR holds two20-year renewable governmental forest management agreements and three deciduous timber allocations in Alberta with an aggregate allowable annual cut of approximately 2.4 million cubic meters of hardwood, of which it currently harvests approximately 44%, and 400,000 cubic meters of softwood, which it sells to sawmills surrounding the Peace River mill in exchange for wood chips. The forest management agreements were flat compared to 2014, as the strengthlast renewed for a20-year term expiring in 2029.

Approximately 85% of the dollar largely offset higher prices inPeace River mill’s hardwood fiber requirements are satisfied through MPR’s forest management agreements and timber allocations with the remainder sourced from trees harvested from third-party owned timberlands. The supply of hardwood fiber at the Peace River mill is characterized by a mix of aspen and balsam poplar. Softwood fiber supply is from residual sawmill chips from local currency terms. However, in Canadian dollar terms, in 2015 average fiber prices for our Celgarsurrounding sawmills.

The Cariboo mill were approximately 17% higher than in 2014, due tohas a secure supply of high-quality residual wood chips primarily supplied by surrounding sawmills located at a short distance. The majority of the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar, as a portion of our Celgar mill’s fiber is currently sourced from sawmills owned by MPR’s joint venture partner. The supply of fiber is characterized by a mix of lodgepole pine, white spruce and interior douglas fir.

Our Friesau mill is dependent on the consistent supply of sawlog fiber. Wood fiber is the single largest input cost and accounts for about 80% of its cash costs of producing lumber. Our Friesau mill is located in U.S. dollars,an area where there is a significant amount of high-quality fiber within economic reach. The wood fiber requirements of the Friesau mill are met primarily through open market purchases and due to increased demand for chips in our Celgar mill’s procurement areacontract purchases from coastal pulp mills.state forestry agencies and private timberland owners.

Labor

Our labor costs are generally steady, with small overall increases due to inflation in wages and health care costs. Over the last three years, weWe have been able to largely offset such increases by increasing our efficiencies and production and streamlining operations.operations; however, such costs increased in 2018 as a result of maintenance work at the mills.

(22)


Energy

Our energy is primarily generated from renewable carbon neutral sources, such as black liquor and wood waste. Our mills produce all of our steamenergy requirements and generate excess energy which we sell to third party utilities.third-party utilities and, in the case of the Peace River mill, into the Alberta market. In 2015,2018, we generated 1,846,8421,711,568 MWh and sold 814,966701,507 MWh of surplus energy. See also “– Generation and Sales of ‘Green’Green Energy and Chemicals at our Mills”. We utilize fossil fuels, such as natural gas, primarily in our lime kilns and we use a limited amount forstart-up and shut-down operations. Additionally, from time to time, mill process disruptions occur and we consume small quantities of purchased electricity and fossil fuels to maintain operations. As a result, all of our mills are subject to fluctuations in the prices for fossil fuels.

Chemicals

Our pulp mills use certain chemicals which are generally available from several suppliers and sourcing is primarily based upon pricing and location. OurOverall, our chemical costs have declinedremained generally stable over the last three years through improved efficienciesyears. However, such costs increased in 2018 as a result of maintenance work and capital expenditures and the strength of the dollar.other cost increases.

In connection with our focus on the growingbio-energy market, we sell tall oil, aby-product of our pulp production process which is used as both a chemical additive and as a “green”green energy source. In 2015,2018, we generated $11.7$14.9 million from the sale of tall oil.oil and other chemicals.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution

Our pulp revenues by geographic area are set out in the following table for the periods indicated:

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  2015   2014   2013   2018(1)   2017   2016 

Revenues by Geographic Area

  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Germany

  $344,843    $346,879    $321,711    $432,055   $342,273   $326,898 

Italy

   53,919     80,730     65,654     70,968    51,589    53,702 

Other European Union countries(1)

   210,218     250,952     224,988  

Other EU countries(2)

   268,204    212,849    173,585 

United States

   15,453     39,146     30,404     55,692    23,572    26,985 

China

   266,632     276,848     300,827     291,657    292,231    221,773 

Other Asia

   43,981     69,711     49,855     61,132    46,355    31,897 

Other countries

   11,191     9,366     2,748     10,880    10,776    12,488 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total(2)(3)

  $    946,237    $    1,073,632    $    996,187    $    1,190,588   $      979,645   $      847,328 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Not including Germany or Italy; includes new entrant countries to the European Union from their timeIncludes results of admission.MPR since December 10, 2018.

(2)

(2)Excluding Germany and Italy.

(3)

Excluding intercompany sales.

(23)


The following charts illustrate the geographic distribution of our pulp revenues as a percentage of our total pulp revenues for the periods indicated:

 

2018 Geographically

Segmented Pulp Sales

LOGO

2017 Geographically
Segmented Pulp Sales

LOGO

2016 Geographically
Segmented Pulp Sales

LOGO

*Not includingExcluding Germany or Italy; includes new entrant countries to the European Union from their time of admission.and Italy.

The distribution of our pulp sales by end use are set out in the following table for the periods indicated:

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
      2015           2014             2013       2018   2017   2016 
  (in thousands of ADMTs)   (in thousands of ADMTs) 

Tissue

   501     542       523     567    587    503 

Specialty

   227     205       181     211    203    209 

Printing & Writing

   716     705       662     635    683    663 

Other

   19     34       74     28    42    54 
  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
         1,463           1,486             1,440                   1,441                  1,515                  1,429 
  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

In 2018, our wood products segment revenues were: (i) 32% from Germany; (ii) 22% from other EU countries; (iii) 31% from the United States; and (iv) 15% from other countries.

Our global sales and marketing group is responsible for conducting all sales and marketing of the pulp produced at our mills and currently has approximately 1415 employees. This group largely handles all European and North American sales directly. Sales to Asia are made directly or through commission agents overseen by our sales group. The global sales and marketing group handles sales to approximately 190180 customers. We coordinate and integrate the sales and marketing activities of our German mills to realize on a number of synergies between them. These include reduced overall administrative and personnel costs and coordinated selling, marketing and transportation activities. We also coordinate pulp sales from the Celgar mill withacross our German mills on a global basis, thereby providing our larger customers with seamless service across all major geographies. In marketing our pulp, we seek to establish long-term relationships by providing a competitively priced, high-quality, consistent product and excellent service. In accordance with customary practice, we maintain long-standing relationships with our customers, pursuant to which we periodically reach agreements on specific volumes and prices.

Our lumber sales are handled by our sales team in Germany and Vancouver. We also sell lumber through commissioned agents in certain markets.

Our pulp and lumber sales are on customary industry terms. At December 31, 2015,2018, we had no material payment delinquencies. In 2015,2018, one customer through several of its operations accounted for 16% of our pulp sales. In 2014, one customersegment through several of its operations accounted for 13% of our revenues. In 2017, one customer of our pulp sales.segment through several

(24)


of its operations accounted for 13% of our revenues. In 2013,2016, two customers through several of their operations accounted for 10%19% and 11%10%, respectively, of our pulp sales. We do not believe our pulp sales are dependent upon the activities of any single customer and the loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect on us.

Our sales to tissue and specialty paper product manufacturers were approximately 50%54% of our pulp sales volume in 20152018, 52% in 2017 and 2014 and about 49% of our pulp sales50% in 2013.2016. Generally, tissue producer customers are

not as sensitive to cyclical declines in demand caused by downturns in economic activity. The balance of our sales was to other paper product manufacturers.

Transportation

We transport our NBSK pulp and lumber generally by truck, rail and ocean carriers through third-party carriers. We have a small fleet of trucks in Germany that deliver some of our German mills’ pulp.

Our German pulp mills are currently the only significant market kraft pulp producers in Germany, which is the largest import market for kraft pulp in Europe. We therefore have a competitive transportation cost advantage compared to Canadian and Northern European pulp producers when shipping to customers in Europe. Due to the location of our German mills, we are able to deliver pulp to many of our customers primarily by truck and rail. Most trucks that deliver goods into Eastern Germany generally do not have significant backhaul opportunities as the region is primarily an importer of goods. We are therefore frequently able to obtain relatively low backhaul freight rates for the delivery of our products to many of our customers. Since many of our customers are located within a 500 kilometer radius of our German mills, we can generally supply pulp to customers of these mills faster than our competitors because of the short distances between the mills and our customers.

The Celgar mill’sOur Canadian mills’ pulp is transported to customers by truck, rail truck and ocean carrier to ensure timely delivery. The majority of Celgar’sour Canadian mills’ pulp for overseas markets is initially delivered primarily by rail to the Port of Vancouver for shipment overseas by ocean carrier. Based in Western Canada, the Celgar mill isour Canadian mills are well positioned to service Asian customers. The majority of the Celgar mill’sour Canadian mills’ pulp for domestic markets is shipped by rail directly to the customer or to third partythird-party warehouses in the U.S. In 2015, we establishedUnited States. We also operate a logistics and reload center near Trail, British Columbia. The center providesColumbia to provide us with additional warehouse space for our Celgar mill and greater transportation flexibility in terms of access to rail and trucking options.

The Friesau mill’s lumber is transported to customers by truck, rail and ocean carriers through third-party carriers.

In each of 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, outbound transportation costs comprised approximately 9%, 9% and 8%, respectively, of our total consolidated cost of sales. Generally, in recent years, our transportation costs have decreasedbeen stable despite growing overseas shipments due to the positive impact of a stronger dollar, decreases in fuel costs and higher shipping capacity. Wecapacity and we have also taken initiatives to target sales to the most “freight logical” customers.

Capital Expenditures

In 2015, weWe have continued with ourto make capital investment programsinvestments designed to increase pulp, “green”green energy and chemical generation,production, reduce costs and improve efficiency and environmental performance at our mills.pulpmills. The improvements made at our mills over the years have increased the competitive position of our facilities.pulp segment. Since its acquisition, we have also made capital investments to optimize sawmill production at the Friesau mill.

(25)


Total capital expenditures at our mills (excluding any related governmental grants) are set out in the following table for the periods indicated:

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  2015   2014   2013   2018(1)     2017     2016 
  (in thousands of dollars)   (in thousands) 

Rosenthal

  $15,690    $16,624    $8,385    $19,632     $18,855     $15,167 

Stendal

   18,490     8,700     32,524     19,228      6,293      7,801 

Celgar

   12,356     9,288     4,798     27,342      29,386      19,558 

Friesau

   20,682      3,197     
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

     

 

 

Total

  $    46,536    $    34,612    $    45,707    $        86,884     $        57,731     $        42,526 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

     

 

 

(1)

Does not include capital expenditures of MPR, which was acquired on December 10, 2018.

Capital investments at the Rosenthal mill in 20152018 primarily related to new chip screens to improve the consistency of chips for the mill’s digester, bleach plant improvements and other projects. In 2017, they related to the purchase of additional land for raw material storage and a railcar acceptance system for logs and, in 2016, they related to a railcar acceptance system for logs and a lime kiln retrofit.

Capital investments at the Stendal mill in 2018 primarily related to wastewater improvement projects including the extension of the effluent treatment plant and other projects. In 2017, they included a project to reduce nitrogen in wastewater and smaller projects and in 2016 they related to a wastewater reduction project consisting of an evaporation plant upgrade and completion of an automated chip storage project. a project to reduce chloride levels in the process water.

In 2014, they related primarily to the automated chip storageJune 2018, we commenced a Phase II expansion and optimization project and a tall oil project. In 2013, capital expenditures at the RosenthalFriesau mill, related primarilywhich is designed to, among other things, increase annual lumber production to approximately 750 million board feet and improve production grade capabilities and efficiencies. We currently expect to substantially complete the completion of the recovery upgrade project and the replacement of capital.

Capital investments at the Stendal mill in 2015 related primarily to a wastewater reduction project consisting of an evaporation plant upgrade. In 2014, they related primarily to the evaporation plant upgrade. In 2013, capital investments at the Stendal mill related primarily to Project Blue Mill, which was completed in December 2013. Project Blue Mill required $49.3 million in capital expenditures, which was primarily funded through approximately €11.3 million ($15.0 million) of non-refundable German government grants, a €17.0 million ($22.2 million) five-year amortizing secured term debt facility, operating cash flow of the Stendal mill and shareholder contributions.2020.

Certain of our capital investment programs in Germany were partially financed through government grants made available by German federal and state governments. Under legislation adopted by the federal and certain state governments of Germany, government grants are provided to qualifying businesses operating in Eastern Germany to finance capital investments. The grants are made to encourage investment and job creation. For example, the government grants received in connection with Project Blue Mill require us to maintain the employment of core employees for five years after completion of the project, among certain other terms. Previously, government grants were available for up to 35% of the cost of qualified investments. These grants at the 35% of cost level required that at least one permanent job be created for each €0.5 million ($0.6 million) of capital investment eligible for such grants and that such jobs be maintained for a period of five years from the completion of the capital investment project. Generally, government grants are not repayable by a recipient unless such recipient fails to complete the proposed capital investment or, if applicable, fails to create or maintain the requisite amount of jobs or comply with other applicable terms. In the case of such failure, the government is entitled to revoke the grants and seek repayment unless such failure resulted from material unforeseen market developments beyond the control of the recipient, in which case the government may refrain from reclaiming previous grants. Pursuant to legislation in effect at the time, the Stendal mill recorded approximately $350.0 million of government grants. We believe that we are currently in compliance in all material respects with all of the terms and conditions governing the government grants we have received in Germany. See Item 3. “Legal Proceedings”.

The following table sets out, as at the dates indicated, the effect of government grants on the recorded value of such assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets:

 

  As at December 31,   As at December 31, 
  2015 2014 2013   2018   2017   2016 
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Property, plant and equipment, gross amount less amortization

  $  1,015,569   $  1,188,195   $  1,403,990    $1,240,789   $    1,088,012   $      971,462 

Less: government grants less amortization

   (253,178 (305,045 (365,359   (211,532   (243,164   (233,186
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net (as shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheet)

  $762,391   $883,150   $1,038,631    $    1,029,257   $844,848   $738,276 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

(26)


The following table sets forth, as at the dates indicated, the gross amount of all government grants we have received and capitalized in our balance sheet, the associated amortization and the resulting net balance we include in our property, plant and equipment:

 

  As at December 31,   As at December 31, 
  2015   2014   2013   2018   2017   2016 
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Government grants – gross(1)

  $475,142    $532,696    $600,158    $503,119   $528,721   $467,260 

Less: Accumulated amortization

   (221,964   (227,651   (234,799

Less: accumulated amortization

   (291,587   (285,557   (234,074
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Government grants less accumulated amortization

  $    253,178    $    305,045    $    365,359    $        211,532   $        243,164   $        233,186 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Grants were received in euros and Canadian dollars and amounts change when translated into dollars as a result of changes in currency exchange rates.

Qualifying capital investments at industrial facilities in Germany that reduce effluent discharges offset wastewater fees that would otherwise be required to be paid. For more information about our environmental capital expenditures, see “– Environmental”.

In 2015,2018, capital investments at the Celgar mill primarily related to improvements to its digester and large maintenance projects. In 2017, capital investments at the Celgar mill included apre-bleach press system upgrade and large maintenance projects. In 2016, they included new wood harvesting equipment, a logistics and reload center and other maintenance projects. In 2014, they included a new chip screening project, the logistics and reload center and maintenance projects. In 2013, capital expenditures at the Celgar mill related primarily to a variety of maintenance projects.

In January 2014, we commenced the implementation of a new enterprise resource planning, or “ERP”, system to replace our existing business software applications at an estimated cost of $12.0 million. The project was designed to be completed in stages over the following two years. The ERP system installation will replace a suite of existing legacy systems which, while functional, will begin becoming obsolete in the near future. The ERP solution introduces state-of-the-art, end-to-end business solutions that will provide automation for most aspects of our business including finance, payroll, inventory management, sales, fiber management, supply chain, business analytics and forecasting.

To assist us through the implementation, we have engaged third party advisors with extensive experience in ERP implementations using contemporary systems implementation methodologies that will address not only the technical complexities of such an implementation but also assist with maintaining internal controls over financial reporting.

Excluding costs for projects2019, excluding amounts being financed through government grants capitaland expected insurance proceeds, we expect our totalcapital expenditures including ERP expenditures, in 2016 are expected to be approximately $56.0$130 million to $150 million.

In our pulp segment, excluding our Peace River mill, we currently expect our capital expenditures in 2019 to be principally comprised principally of approximately:

$18.2approximately $90 million atfor large maintenance projects, improvements to the Rosenthal mill for the retrofit of the lime kiln, a rail acceptance system for logsCelgar mill’s bale line and other capital improvements at our mills. At the Peace River mill we will be undertaking significant maintenance projects;to the boiler that will be funded by insurance proceeds. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – General”.

$16.2In our wood products segment, we currently expect capital expenditures in 2019 at our Friesau mill, principally comprised of approximately $50 million at the Stendalfor further upgrades to our planer mill for the replacement of mobile equipmentand large sawline and other maintenance projects;capital improvements.

$20.3 million at the Celgar mill for maintenance projects and the purchase of equipment for our second pass harvesting project; and

$1.3 million for continuing implementation of our ERP software across the entire company.

Innovation

We are well positioned to capitalize onutilize our expertise with fiber andwood, its processing andby-products to expand our product mix and intomix. As a result, we seek to develop new markets. Accordingly, we have a number of initiatives focused on developing innovative new products that are based on derivatives of the kraft pulping process.process and wood processing. Currently these derivativesprocesses are focused in two broad categories:on:

 

the further refinement of materials contained in black liquor, the extractive chemical and lignin containing compounds that are a result of the kraft pulping process; and

 

the further refinement of cellulose materials that are currently the basis of NBSK pulp.pulp; and

higher use products that may be derived from wood processing and harvesting including oils from sandalwood trees.

We are working on some of these initiatives on our own and somewith others in conjunction with industry associations and others withor joint venture partners. Currently, oneOne of the more well-developedbetter-developed of these projects is a cellulose derivative generally referredprocess to in the industry as “cellulose filaments”. Cellulose filaments are the result of a new process that unbindsunbind the individual filaments that make up a cellulose fiber. In northern softwoods, there are approximately 1,000 filaments making up a single fiber. The filaments resulting from this patented

(27)


process are long, ribbon-like structures that have unique strength characteristics similar to other chemical derivatives, such as aramids. We believe that this material may haveare working to create commercial potential in many applications therefor, including as strength enhancers, solution stabilizers and specialty solutions for numerous other industries.products and applications.

We are part ofThrough an industry association, that has made considerable progress inwe are developing a particularproven manufacturing process.process able to supply commercial quantities of cellulose filaments. We, along with other member companies, including certain other NBSKpulp producers, have license rights to further develop and market existing intellectual property registered under patent to our industry association. The association and one of its member companies have constructed a pilot production facility and we have access to its product for development purposes. While there remains much work to be done, we continue to be encouraged with the results to date and intend to continueWe expect to expend resources to further develop this technology, both individually and in joint development arrangements with third parties. We currently estimate expenditures totaling approximately $0.5$1 million in 2016.2019.

Such research and development is stillof various end use applications are at an early stagedifferent levels of development and, to date, there has been no commercialization of any products to date. We currently estimate it may take between two and four years before we can determine if product applications can be commercialized. However, thereproducts. There can be no assurance that such research and development will ever result in commercialization or the production or sales of any products by us at a profit or at all.

We haveare also worked with suppliers to develop new customized formsresearching potential higher use products that may be derived from processing different species of railcarstrees. In particular, we recently acquired the Santanol Group which harvests and processes sandalwood trees in Germany designed to better handle the transportation of logs and chips to our German mills. These customized cars are larger than existing ones and are expected to reduce transportation and handling costs at our German mills.Australia. We expect to take delivery of about 300 to 400 cars over the next 18 months.

We have also worked with equipment suppliers to develop innovative logging equipment to permit us to effect second pass harvesting in the fiber procurement areawill be processing these trees for the Celgar mill. Such equipment includes customized processingproduction of sandalwood oil. This product is valued by the fragrance and chipping equipmentessential oil industries for its scent and trailers for haulage.health benefits.

Environmental

Our operations are subject to a wide range of environmental laws and regulations, dealing primarily with:

air, water and land;

solid and hazardous waste management;

waste disposal;

remediation and contaminated sites; and

chemical usage.

Compliance with water, airthese laws and land pollution control. regulations generally involves capital expenditures as well as additional operating costs. We cannot easily quantify the future amounts of capital expenditures we might have to make to comply with these laws and regulations or the effects on our operating costs because in some instances compliance standards have not been developed, have not become final or definitive or may be amended in the future. In addition, it is difficult to isolate the environmental component of most manufacturing capital projects.

We devote significant management and financial resources to comply with all applicable environmental laws and regulations. In particular, the operation of our plants is

subject to permits, authorizations and approvals and we have to comply with certainprescribed emission limits. Compliance with these requirements is monitored by local authorities andnon-compliance may result in administrative orders, fines or closures of thenon-compliant mill. Our total capital expenditures on environmental projects at our mills were approximately $19.4$20.6 million in 2015,2018, approximately $6.1$4.6 million in 20142017 and approximately $1.9$2.9 million in 2013.2016. In 2016,2019, capital expenditures for environmental projects, principally comprised of projects to improve wastewater quality, are expected to be approximately $1.3$6.0 million.

Environmental compliance is a priority for our operations. To ensure compliance with environmental laws and regulations, we regularly monitor emissions at our mills and periodically perform

(28)


environmental audits of operational sites and procedures both with our internal personnel and outside consultants. These capital expenditures are expectedaudits identify opportunities for improvement and allow us to reduce wastewater fees and upgradetake proactive measures at the effluent system.mills as considered appropriate.

We believe we have obtained all required environmental permits, authorizations and approvals for our operations. We believe our operations are currently in material compliance with the requirements of all applicable environmental laws and regulations and our respective operating permits.

Under German state environmental rules relating to effluent discharges, industrial users are required to pay wastewater fees based upon the amount of their effluent discharge. These rules also provide that an industrial user which undertakes environmental capital expenditures and lowers certain effluent discharges to prescribed levels may offset the amount of these expenditures against the wastewater fees that they would otherwise be required to pay. We expect capital investment programs and other environmental initiatives at our German mills will continue to offset the wastewater fees that are payable and we believe they will ensure that our operations continue in substantial compliance with prescribed standards.

Environmental compliance isIn Canada, in addition to existing provincial air quality regulations, the federal government has proposed an air quality management system, referred to as “AQMS”, as a prioritycomprehensive national approach for improving air quality in Canada. The federal proposed AQMS includes:

ambient air quality standards for outdoor air quality management across the country;

a framework for air zone air management within provinces and territories that targets specific sources of air emissions;

regional airsheds that facilitate coordinated action across borders;

industrial sector-based emission requirements that set a national base level of performance for major industries in Canada; and

improved intergovernmental collaboration to reduce emissions from the transportation sector.

In 2016, Environment Canada released thePan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change. The framework put in place a national, sector-based greenhouse gas reduction program applicable to a number of industries. In addition, the provincial governments of Alberta and British Columbia:

have greenhouse gas reporting requirements;

are working on reduction strategies; and

together with the Canadian federal government, are considering new or revised emission standards.

In addition, British Columbia has adopted a carbon tax and Alberta has a mandatory greenhouse gas emission reduction regulation.

We believe that these air emission measures in Germany and Canada have not had, and in 2019 will not have, a significant effect on our operations. To ensure complianceAlthough these measures could have a material adverse effect on our operations in the future, we expect that we will not be disproportionately affected by these measures as compared with environmental laws and regulations, we regularly monitor emissions atowners of comparable operations. We also expect that these measures will not significantly disrupt our mills and periodically perform environmental audits of operational sites and procedures both with our internal personnel and outside consultants. These audits identify opportunities for improvement and allow us to take proactive measures at the mills as considered appropriate.planned operations.

The Rosenthal mill has a relatively modern biological wastewater treatment and oxygen bleaching facility. We have significantly reduced our levels of absorbable organic halogen discharge at the Rosenthal mill and we believe the Rosenthal mill’s absorbable organic halogen and chemical oxygen discharges are in compliance with the standards currently mandated by the German government.

Management believes that, as the Stendal mill is a state-of-the-art facility, it will be able to continue to operate in compliance with the applicable environmental requirements.(29)

Management further believes that Celgar will continue to operate in substantial compliance with the requirements of all applicable environmental laws and regulations.


Future regulations or permits may place lower limits on allowable types of emissions, including air, water, waste and hazardous materials, and may increase the financial consequences of maintaining compliance with environmental laws and regulations or conducting remediation. Our ongoing monitoring and policies have enabled us to develop and implement effective measures to maintain emissions in substantial compliance with environmental laws and regulations to date in a cost-effective manner. However, there can be no assurancesassurance that this will be the case in the future.

Climate Change

Over the past several years, changing weather patterns and climatic conditions due to natural andman-made causes have added to the unpredictability and frequency of natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, hail storms, wildfires and wind, snow storms and ice storms, which could alsostorms. Such changes and resulting conditions can adversely affect our operations, including variations in the cost and availability of raw materials, such as fiber. However, asfiber, unplanned downtime, operating rates and transportation and logistics. As there are

differing scientific studies relating to the severity, extent and speed at which climate change is occurring, we cannot identify and predict all of the consequences of climate change on our business and operations.

The effects and perceived effects of climate change and social and governmental responses have created both opportunities and negative consequences for our business.

The focus on climate change has generated a substantial increase in demand and in legislative requirements for “carbon neutral”carbon neutral or “green” energy in both Europe and, increasingly, in North America.green energy. Pulp mills consume wood residuals, being wood chips and pulp logs, as the base raw material for their production process. Wood chips are residuals left over from lumber production and pulp logs are generally lower quality logs left over from logging that are unsuitable for the production of lumber. Sawmills consume sawlogs and residuals like wood chips that are generally sold to other industrial consumers like pulp and pellet producers.

As part of their production process, our pulp mills take wood residuals and process them through a digester where cellulose is separated from the wood to be used in pulp production and the remaining residuals, called “black liquor”,black liquor, are used for “green”green energy production. As a result of their use of wood residuals and because our mills generate combined heat and power in a process known as cogeneration, they are efficient producers of energy. Our Friesau mill utilizes residual bark and shavings from consumed logs to produce energy. This energy is carbon neutral and produced from a renewable source. Our relatively modern mills generate a substantial amount of energy that is surplus to their operational requirements.

These factors, along with governmental initiatives in respect of renewable or “green”green energy legislation, have provided business opportunities for us to enhance our generation and sales of “green”green energy to regional utilities.

We are constantly exploring other initiatives to enhance our generation and sales of surplus “green”green energy and chemicalby-products. Other potential opportunities that may result from climate change include:

 

the expansion of softwood forests and increased growth rates for such forests;

 

more intensive forestry practices and timber salvaging versus harvesting standing timber;

 

greater demand for sustainable energy and cellulosic biomass fuels; and

 

additional governmental incentives and/or legislative requirements to enhance biomass energy production.

(30)


At this time, we cannot predict which, if any, of these potential opportunities will be realized by us or their economic effect on our business.

While not all of the specific consequences to our business from climate change are not predictable, the most visible adverse consequence to date is that the focus on renewable energy has created greater demand and competition for wood residuals or fiber from renewable energy producers like the pellet industry in Germany.

In Germany, the price and supply of wood residuals have been affected by an increasing demand from alternative or renewable energy producers and governmental initiatives for carbon neutral energy. Declining energy prices, weaker economies or warm winters such as in 2015 and 2014 temper the demand for wood chips resulting from initiatives by European governments to promote the use of wood as a carbon neutral energy. Over the long term, this There can be no assurance that suchnon-traditional demand for fiber is expected to increasewill remain strong in Europe.the long-term. Additionally, the growing interest and focus in British Columbia for renewable “green”green energy is also

expected to createhas created additional competition for such fiber in that region over time.fiber. Such additional demand for wood residuals may increase the competition and prices for wood residuals over time.

GovernmentalIn response to climate change risks, there have been governmental initiatives and legislation on the international, national, state and local levels. Such governmental action or legislation may alsocan have an important effect on the demand and prices for wood residuals.fiber. As governments pursue “green”green energy initiatives, they risk creating incentives and demand for wood residuals from renewable energy producers that “cannibalizes” or adversely affects traditional users, such as lumber and pulp and paper producers. We are continually engaged in dialogue with governments to educate and try to ensure potential initiatives recognize the traditional and continuing role of our mills in the overall usage of forestry resources and the economies of local communities.

Other potential negative consequences from climate change that over time may affect our business include:

 

a greater susceptibility of northern softwood forests to disease, fire and insect infestation;

 

the disruption of transportation systems and power supply lines due to more severe storms;

 

the loss of fresh water transportation for logs and pulp due to lower water levels;

 

decreases in the quantity and quality of processed water for our mill operations;

 

the loss of northern softwood forests in areas in sufficient proximity to our mills to competitively acquire fiber; and

 

lower harvest levels decreasing the supply of harvestable timber and, as a consequence, wood residuals.

Human Resources

We currently employ approximately 1,469 people. We have2,210 people, of which approximately 1,0281,395 employees workingwork in our German operations includingand approximately 780 employees work in our wood procurement, transportation and sales subsidiaries. In Canada, we haveCanadian operations.

Our pulp mills employ approximately 441 employees,1,790 people, the majority of which 21whom are employed at our Vancouver, British Columbia, office.

Rosenthalbound by collective agreements. The Friesau mill employs approximately 438340 people, the majority of whom are bound by a collective agreement. In July 2015, the Rosenthal mill revised its collective agreement for a two-year period until June 2017. The agreement provides for an initial 2.4% wage increase and a subsequent increase of 2.4% in September 2016.

Stendal employs approximately 584 people, the majority of which are bound by a collective agreement. In 2011, Stendal entered into a seven-year collective agreement, effective July 2011 and expiring in 2018. Since, prior to entering into this collective agreement, Stendal’s employees had relatively lower wages compared to their peers at other German pulp mills, this agreement provided for an approximately 5.5% wage increase in 2012 and a further 2.5% minimum annual wage increase from 2013 to 2015.

Celgar employs approximately 420 people, the majority of which are bound by a collective agreement. Celgar entered into a five-year collective agreement with its hourly workers in 2012, which expires in April 2017. The agreement provided for lump sum payments of C$3,750 for all active employees in 2012 and 2013 and wage increases of 2.0%, 2.5% or 3.0% in each of 2014, 2015 and 2016.(31)


We consider the relationships with our employees to be good. Although no assurancesassurance can be provided, we have not had any significant work stoppages at any of our operations and we would therefore expect to enter into new labor agreements with our workers when the current labor agreements expire without any significant work stoppages.

Our directorssenior managers and senior managersdirectors have extensive experience in the pulp, lumber and forestry industries, along with experienced managers at all of our mills. Our management has a proven track record of implementing new initiatives and capital projects in order to reduce costs throughout our operations as well as identifying and harnessing new revenue opportunities.

Wood Products Industry

General

With approximately 3.7 billion cubic meters, Germany has the largest timber reserves in Europe. The principal trees are spruce, pine, beech and oak. Approximately 70 to 80 million cubic meters are harvested annually. Many of the German forest areas have been certified according to PEFC or FSC standards. Modern solid wood products include sawn and planed lumber which are used in different areas.

Demand for softwood lumber is cyclical and influenced by transportation costs, exchange rates, government tariffs and competitiveness of substitute products, as well as factors that affect consumer confidence and drive demand for residential construction, such as interest rates, disposable income, unemployment rates, perceived job security and other indicators of general economic conditions. Demand can vary from region to region within a country and seasonal factors that determine optimal building conditions can also affect demand.

Lumber Products and Markets

Our Friesau mill, which was built in 1992 and has two high-volume Linck sawlines, has the ability to produce both rough and planed products. The sawmill principally manufactures finished sawn lumber milled from spruce and pine, including European metric and specialty lumber, U.S. dimensional lumber andJ-grade lumber, in various sizes and grades.

The process for manufacturing lumber results in a significant percentage of each sawlog ending up asby-products or residuals such as wood chips, trim blocks, sawdust shavings and bark.By-products are typically sold to a wide variety of customers. In addition, we utilize a significant portion of the chips from the Friesau mill at our Rosenthal pulp mill.

The main markets for our lumber products are in Europe, the United States and the Far East.

Our Friesau mill fosters a diverse customer base in each of its key markets. Customers include national and regional distributors, large construction firms, secondary manufacturers, retail yards and home centers.

Competition

The markets for our lumber products are highly competitive on a global basis and producers compete generally on price, quality and service. Factors influencing our competitive position include, among others, the availability, quality and cost of raw materials, including fiber, energy and labor and the efficiency and productivity of the Friesau mill in relation to its competitors. The Friesau mill competes in international markets subject to currency fluctuations and global business conditions.

(32)


Our Friesau mill competes against many producers, a number of whom own and operate more mills than we do and numerous competitors have greater financial resources or lower production costs than us.

Description of Certain Indebtedness

The following summarizes certain material provisions of: (i)of our 2019senior notes and 2022 Senior Notes; (ii) our Stendal Revolving Credit Facility; (iii) our credit facilities related to our Rosenthal mill; and (iv) the Celgar Working Capital Facility.revolving working capital facilities. The summaries are not complete and are qualified by reference to the applicable documents and the applicable amendments to such documents on file with the SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, referred to as the “SEC”, and incorporated by reference herein.

2019 and 2022 Senior Notes

On November 26, 2014, we issued $250.0 million in aggregate principal amountWe currently have outstanding the following issues of 7.000% Senior Notes due 2019,senior notes, collectively referred to as the “2019 Senior“Senior Notes”, and $400.0:

$100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.750% Senior Notessenior notes due 2022, referred to as the “2022 Senior Notes” and, together with;

$250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.500% senior notes due 2024, referred to as the 2019“2024 Senior Notes, the “2019 and 2022 Senior Notes”, to refinance our previously outstanding 9.50% Senior Notes due 2017, Stendal’s senior project finance facility and Stendal’s amortizing term facility for Project Blue Mill.;

The 2019 Senior Notes mature on December 1, 2019 and interest on the 2019 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on each June 1 and December 1. Interest is payable to holders of record of the 2019 Senior Notes on the immediately preceding May 15 and November 15 and is computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months.

$350.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.375% senior notes due 2025, referred to as the “2025 Senior Notes”(1); and

$300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.500% senior notes due 2026, referred to as the “2026 Senior Notes”(2).

(1)

Issued in December 2018 and the net proceeds, along with cash on hand, were used to purchase MPR.

(2)

Issued in December 2017 and the net proceeds, along with cash on hand, were used on January 5, 2018 to redeem $300.0 million of 2022 Senior Notes.

The 2022 Senior Notes mature on December 1, 2022 and interest on the 2022 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on each June 1 and December 1. Interest is payable to holders of record of the 2022 Senior Notes on the immediately preceding May 15 and November 15 and is computed on the basis of a360-day year consisting of twelve30-day months.

Commencing December 1, 2016, the 2019 Senior Notes will become redeemable at our option at a price equal to 103.500% of the principal amount redeemed and declining ratably on December 1 of each year thereafter to 100.000% on or after December 1, 2018. Commencing December 1, 2017, the 2022 Senior Notes will becomebecame redeemable at our option at a price equal to 105.813% of the principal amount redeemed and declining ratably on December 1 of each year thereafter to 100.000% on or after December 1, 2020.

The 2024 Senior Notes mature on February 1, 2024 and interest on the 2024 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on each February 1 and August 1. Interest is payable to holders of record of the 2024 Senior Notes on the immediately preceding January 15 and July 15 and is computed on the basis of a360-day year consisting of twelve30-day months. Commencing February 1, 2020, the 2024 Senior Notes will become redeemable at our option at a price equal to 103.250% of the principal amount redeemed and declining ratably on February 1 of each year thereafter to 100.000% on or after February 1, 2022.

The 2025 Senior Notes mature on January 15, 2025 and interest on the 2025 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on each January 15 and July 15. Commencing July 15, 2019, interest is payable to holders of record of the 2025 Senior Notes on the immediately preceding January 1 and July 1 and is computed on the basis of a360-day year consisting of twelve30-day months. Commencing January 15, 2021, the 2025 Senior Notes will become redeemable at our option at a price equal to 103.688% of the principal amount redeemed and declining ratably on January 15 of each year thereafter to 100.000% on or after January 15, 2023.

(33)


The 2026 Senior Notes mature on January 15, 2026 and interest on the 2026 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on each January 15 and July 15. Commencing July 15, 2018, interest is payable to holders of record of the 2026 Senior Notes on the immediately preceding January 1 and July 1 and is computed on the basis of a360-day year consisting of twelve30-day months. Commencing January 15, 2021, the 2026 Senior Notes will become redeemable at our option at a price equal to 102.750% of the principal amount redeemed and declining ratably on January 15 of each year thereafter to 100.000% on or after January 15, 2023.

The indentures governing the 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes contain covenants limiting, among other things, our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to: incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock; pay dividends or make other distributions to our shareholders; purchase or redeem capital stock or subordinated indebtedness; make investments; create liens; incur restrictions on the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other payments to us; sell assets; consolidate or merge with or into other companies or transfer all or substantially all of our assets; and engage in transactions with affiliates. As of December 31, 2015,2018, all of our subsidiaries arewere restricted subsidiaries.

The 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes are unsecured and are not guaranteed by any of our operating subsidiaries, all of which are located outside the United States. Our obligations under the 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes rank: effectively junior in right of payment to all of our existing and future secured indebtedness, to the extent of the assets securing such indebtedness, and all indebtedness and liabilities of

our subsidiaries; equal in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness; and senior in right of payment to any of our future subordinated indebtedness.

As at December 31, 2015, $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2019 Senior Notes and $400.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2022 Senior Notes were outstanding.

StendalPan-German Revolving Credit Facility

On November 25, 2014,In December 2018, certain of our Stendal millGerman subsidiaries entered into a €75.0new €200.0 million joint revolving credit facility, referred to as the “Stendal Revolving Credit“German Facility”, with a syndicategroup of four banks as originalbank lenders. The German Facility, which will be used for general corporate purposes, replaced three existing revolving credit facilities of certain of our German subsidiaries which aggregated €170.0 million. The principal terms of the Stendal Revolving CreditGerman Facility are as follows:include:

 

The total availability under the facilityGerman Facility is €75.0€200.0 million.

 

The facilityGerman Facility matures on the earlier of October 31, 2019 and one month prior to the stated maturity of the 2019 Senior Notes.in December 2023.

 

The facility may be utilized inGerman Facility is unsecured and is jointly and severally guaranteed by each of our German subsidiaries.

Interest under the form of cash advances or advances by letters of credit or bank guarantees of up to €5.0 million. Borrowings accrue interest at a rateGerman Facility is payable on loans of Euribor plus a 3.50% margin. Fees of 2.25% per annum are payable1.05% to 2.00% depending on issued but undrawn letters ofthe leverage ratio as defined in the underlying credit and bank guarantees. There is aagreement.

A commitment fee equal to 35% of 1.10% per annumthe applicable margin on the unused and uncancelled amount of the German Facility is payable on unused availability.quarterly in arrears.

 

The facility is secured by a first ranking registered security interest on the inventories and receivables of Stendal. All shareholder loans made by Mercer Inc. to Stendal are subordinated to the indebtedness under the facility.

The facilityGerman Facility contains financial maintenance covenants which are tested semi-annually on June 30 and Decembera quarterly basis, commencing March 31, 2019, which require Stendalrequire: (i) our German subsidiaries that are party thereto to maintain (i) a leverage ratio of “net debt” (excluding shareholder loans) to EBITDA of not greater than 2.50:1.00,3.50:1.00; and (ii) an interest coverage ratio (EBITDA to interest expense)defined capital of not less than 1.20:1.00 and (iii) a current ratio (current assets to current liabilities) of at least 1.10:1.00.€400.0 million.

 

Stendal is permitted under the facility to make (i) distributions for regularly scheduled interest payments on its shareholder loans from Mercer Inc. in an amount of up to $23.0 million per year, provided it maintains pro forma liquidity (availability under the facility plus unencumbered cash) of at least €20.0 million and no event of default is occurring and (ii) other distributions to Mercer Inc. semi-annually, provided it maintains pro forma liquidity of at least €20.0 million, no event of default is occurring and it has (A) a leverage ratio (excluding shareholder loans) of not greater than 2.50:1.00, (B) a trailing six-month interest coverage ratio of at least 1.40:1.00 and (C) a current ratio of at least 1.25:1.00.

Pursuant to the facility, Stendal has provided €8.5 million as partial cash collateral for variable-to-fixed interest rate swaps, referred to as the “Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract”, and such contract sharespari passu in the security for the Stendal Revolving Credit Facility. For further information related to the Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract, see Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” and the notes to our consolidated financials included herein.

The facilityGerman Facility contains other customary restrictive covenants which, among other things, govern the ability of Stendalour German subsidiaries to incur liens, sell assets, incur indebtedness, make investments,acquisitions with proceeds from the German Facility, enter into joint ventures change its business and issue,or repurchase or redeem shares. The facilityGerman Facility also contains customary events of default.

Rosenthal Credit Facilities

Our Rosenthal mill has the following credit facilities:

 

(34)


a €25.0 million revolving working capital facility which we extended in 2016The German Facility is available to mature in October 2019, referred to as the “Rosenthal Loan Facility”. The Rosenthal Loan Facility consists of a revolving credit facility which may be utilized by way of cash advances or advances by way of letter of credit or bank guarantees. The interest payable on cash advances is Euribor plus 2.95%, plus certain other costs incurred by the lenders in connection with the facility. Each cash advance is to be repaid on the last dayall of the respective interest period and in full on the termination date and each advance by way of a letter of credit or bank guarantee shall be repaid on the applicable expiry date of such letter of credit or bank guarantee. An interest periodborrowers, subject to maximum borrowingsub-limits for cash advances shall be one, three or six months or any other period as Rosenthal and the lenders may determine. There is also a 0.90% per annum commitment fee on the unused and uncancelled amountcertain of the revolving facility which is payable semi-annually in arrears. This facility is secured by a first ranking security interest on the inventories and receivables of Rosenthal. It also provides Rosenthal with a hedging facility relating to the hedging of the interest, currency and pulp prices as they affect Rosenthal pursuant to a strategy agreed to by Rosenthal and the lender from time to time. borrowers.

As at December 31, 2015, €3.12018, approximately €51.5 million ($59.0 million) of the German Facility was drawn and approximately €11.9 million ($13.6 million) of the German Facility was supporting bank guarantees leaving approximately €21.9€136.6 million available under this facility; and($156.5 million) available.

a €5.0 million revolving credit facility for our Rosenthal mill which bears interest at the rate of the three-month Euribor plus 2.5%. Borrowings under this agreement are secured by certain land at the Rosenthal mill. The facility matures in December 2018.

Celgar Working Capital Facility

OurIn July 2018, our Celgar mill’smill entered into a C$40.0 million revolving credit facility with a Canadian bank, referred to as the “Celgar Working Capital Facility”,. The principal terms of the facility include:

The facility matures on May 2, 2019. in July 2023.

The facility is available by way of: (i) Canadian and U.S. denominated advances, which bear interest at a designated prime rate less 0% to 0.125% per annum,annum; (ii) banker’s acceptance equivalent loans, which bear interest at the applicable Canadian dollar banker’s acceptance plus 1.25% to 1.50% per annumannum; and (iii) U.S. dollar LIBOR advances, which bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.25% to 1.50% per annum.

The facility includes a C$3.0 millionsub-limit for letters of credit. Celgar is required to pay 1.00% to 1.25% per annum on issued letters of credit and 0.25% per annum on unused availability under the facility and 1.25% per annum on issued but undrawn letters of credit. facility.

The availability of the facility is subject to a borrowing base limit that is based on the Celgar mill’s eligible receivable and inventory levels from time to time.

The Celgar Working Capital Facility is secured by, among other things, a first priority charge on the inventories and receivables of Celgar. The facility is guaranteed by Mercer Inc. and all material subsidiaries of Celgar.

The facility includes a springing financial covenant, which is measured when excess availability under the facility is less than C$5.0 million and which requires Celgar to comply with a 1.10:1.00 fixed charge coverage ratio.

The facility also contains restrictive covenants which, among other things, restrict the ability of Celgar to declare and pay dividends, incur indebtedness, incur liens and make payments on subordinated debt. The facility contains customary events of default.

As at December 31, 2018, approximately C$1.7 million ($1.2 million) was supporting letters of credit and approximately C$38.3 million ($28.1 million) was available under the Celgar Working Capital Facility.

MPR Revolving Credit Facility

In February 2019, our Peace River mill entered into a C$60.0 million revolving credit facility with a Canadian bank, referred to as the “MPR Working Capital Facility”. The principal terms of the facility include:

The facility matures in February 2024.

The facility is available by way of: (i) Canadian denominated advances, which bear interest at a designated prime rate per annum; (ii) banker’s acceptance equivalent loans, which bear interest at the applicable Canadian dollar banker’s acceptance plus 1.25% to

(35)


1.50% per annum; (iii) dollar denominated base rate advances at the greater of the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, a designated LIBOR rate plus 1.00% and the bank’s applicable reference rate for U.S. dollar loans; and (iv) dollar LIBOR advances, which bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.25% to 1.50% per annum.

The facility includes a C$5.0 millionsub-limit for letters of credit of MPR. MPR is required to pay 1.25% to 1.50% per annum, plus a 0.125% annual fee where there is more than one lender under the facility, on issued letters of credit.

The availability of the facility is subject to a borrowing base limit that is based on the Peace River mill’s eligible receivable and inventory levels from time to time.

The MPR Working Capital Facility is secured by, among other things, a first priority charge on the inventories and receivables of the Peace River mill.

The facility includes a springing financial covenant, which is measured when excess availability under the facility is less than the greater of 10% of borrowing base thereunder or C$4.5 million and which requires MPR to comply with a 1.00:1.00 fixed charge coverage ratio.

The facility also contains restrictive covenants which, among other things, restrict the ability of MPR to declare and pay dividends, incur indebtedness, incur liens, make investments, including in its existing joint ventures, and make payments on subordinated debt. The facility contains customary events of default.

Internet Availability and Additional Information

We make available free of charge, on or through our website at www.mercerint.com, annual reports on Form10-K, quarterly reports on Form10-Q and current reports on Form8-K, and all amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we file these materials with, or furnish these materials to, the SEC. The public may read and copy any material we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DCD.C. 20549. The public may also obtain information on the

operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site at www.sec.gov that also contains our current and periodic reports, including our proxy and information statements.

All websites referred to herein are inactive textual references only, meaning that the information contained on such websites is not incorporated by reference herein and you should not consider information contained on such websites as part of this document unless expressly specified.

(36)


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The statements in this “Risk Factors” section describe material risks to our business and should be considered carefully. You should review carefully the risk factors listed below, as well as those factors listed in other documents we file with the SEC. In addition, these statements constitute our cautionary statements under thePrivate Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.1995. Our disclosure and analysis in this annual report on Form10-K and in our annual report to shareholders contain some forward-looking statements that set forth anticipated results based on management’s current plans and assumptions.

There are a number of important factors, many of which are beyond our control that could cause actual conditions, events or results to differ significantly from those described in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

our business is highly cyclical;cyclical in nature;

 

a weakening of the global economy, including capital and credit markets, could adversely affect our business and financial results and have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and capital resources;

 

our level of indebtedness could negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity;

 

cyclical fluctuations in the price and supply of our raw materials, particularly fiber, could adversely affect our business;

 

we face intense competition in our markets;

 

we are exposed to currency exchange rate fluctuations;

 

political uncertainty, the rise of populist political parties and an increase in trade protectionism could have a material adverse effect on global macro-economic activities and trade and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition;

we are subject to extensive environmental regulation and we could incur substantial costs as a result of compliance with, violations of or liabilities under applicable environmental laws and regulations;

 

our business is subject to risks associated with climate change and social and government responses thereto;

 

our new ERP system may cost more than expected, be delayed, fail to perform as planned and interrupt operational transactions during and following the implementation, which could adversely affect our operations and results of operations;

we periodically use derivatives to manage certain risks which has caused significant fluctuations in our operating results;

our operations require substantial capital and we may be unable to maintain adequate capital resources to provide for such capital requirements;

 

our acquisition of MPR and other future acquisitions may result in additional risks and uncertainties in our business;

 

the operations of MPR are subject to their own risks, which we may not be able to manage successfully;

we may not be able to enhance the operating performance and financial results or lower the costs of MPR’s operations as planned;

fluctuations in prices and demand for lumber could adversely affect our business;

adverse housing market conditions may increase the credit risk from customers of our wood products segment;

our wood products segment lumber products are vulnerable to declines in demand due to competing technologies or materials;

(37)


changes in credit ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations could adversely affect our cost of financing and have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities;

 

we rely on government grants and participate in German statutory energy programs;

 

we are subject to risks related to our employees;

 

we are dependent on key personnel;

we may experience material disruptions to our production (including as a result of, among other things, planned and unplanned maintenance downtime);production;

 

if our long-lived assets become impaired, we may be required to recordnon-cash impairment charges that could have a material impact on our results of operations;

 

we may incur losses as a result of unforeseen or catastrophic events, including the emergence of a pandemic, terrorist attacks or natural disasters;

 

our insurance coverage may not be adequate;

 

we rely on third parties for transportation services;

we periodically use derivatives to manage certain risks which could cause significant fluctuations in our operating results;

 

failures or security breaches of our information technology systems could disrupt our operations and negatively impact our business;

 

the price of our common stock may be volatile;

 

a small number of our shareholders could significantly influence our business;

 

our international sales and operations are subject to applicable laws relating to trade, export controls and foreign corrupt practices, the violation of which could adversely affect our operations; and

 

we are exposed to interest rate fluctuations.

From time to time, we also provide forward-looking statements in other materials we release as well as oral forward-looking statements. Such statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events; they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts.

Statements in the future tense, and all statements accompanied by terms such as “may”, “will”, “believe”, “project”, “expect”, “estimate”, “assume”, “intend”, “design”, “anticipate”, “plan”, “should” and variations thereof and similar terms are intended to be forward-looking statements as defined by federal securities law. You can find examples of these statements throughout this annual report on Form10-K, including in the description of business in Item 1. “Business” and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”. While these forward-looking statements reflect our best estimates when made, the following risk factors could cause actual results to differ materially from estimates or projections.

We intend that all forward-looking statements we make will be subject to safe harbor protection of the federal securities laws pursuant to Section 27A of theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.amended, referred to as the “Exchange Act”.

You should consider the limitations on, and risks associated with, forward-looking statements and not unduly rely on the accuracy of predictions contained in such forward-looking statements. As noted above, these forward-looking statements speak only as of the date when they are made. We do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events, circumstances, changes in expectations, or the occurrence of unanticipated events after the date of those statements. Moreover, in the

(38)


future, we may make forward-looking statements that involve the risk factors and other matters described in this document as well as other risk factors subsequently identified.

Our business is highly cyclical in nature.

The pulp business isand lumber businesses are highly cyclical in nature and markets are characterized by periods of supply and demand imbalance, which in turn can materially affect prices. Pulp and lumber markets are sensitive to cyclical

changes in the global economy, industry capacity and foreign exchange rates, all of which can have a significant influence on selling prices and our operating results. The length and magnitude of industry cycles have varied over time but generally reflect changes in macro-economic conditions and levels of industry capacity. Pulp is a commodityand lumber are commodities that isare generally available from other producers. Because commodity products have few distinguishing qualities from producer to producer, competition is generally based upon price, which is generally determined by supply relative to demand.

Industry capacity can fluctuate as changing industry conditions can influence producers to idle production capacity or permanently close mills. In addition, to avoid substantial cash costs in idling or closing a mill, some producers will choose to operate at a loss, sometimes even a cash loss, which can prolong weak pricing environments due to oversupply. Oversupply of our products can also result from producers introducing new capacity in response to favorable pricing trends. Certain integrated pulp and paper producers have the ability to discontinue paper production by idling their paper machines and selling their NBSK pulp production on the market, if market conditions, prices and trends warrant such actions.

Currently, there have been publiclywe are not aware of any material announced significant increases to expand chemical pulp capacity worldwide. Producers have announced projects to increase hardwood kraft pulp capacity by an aggregate of about 3.6 million ADMTs in 2016 and 2017, primarily in South America and Asia. Further capacity increases of about 2.7 million ADMTs have been announced for 2018. This increase in bleached hardwood kraft pulp is largely targeted at the growing demand forNBSK or NBHK pulp in developing markets, particularly in China, by producers of tissues, specialty papers and packaging. If such additional bleached hardwood kraft pulp supply is not absorbed by such demand growth, as a result of generally lower prices for bleached hardwood kraft pulp, this supply increase could put downward pressure on NBSK pulp prices.

Producers have also announced increases to NBSK pulp capacity in 2016 and 2017 of an estimated 1.1 million ADMTs, along with another 0.8 million ADMTs of southern softwood and fluff pulp capacity. Further capacity increases of about 0.9 million ADMTs have been announced for 2018. At this time,2019. However, we cannot predict how much of the publiclywhether new capacity will be announced capacityor will come on line and when.in the future. If suchany new capacity, particularly for NBSK pulp, is not absorbed in the market or offset by curtailments or closures of older, high-cost NBSK pulp mills, the increase could put downward pressure on NBSK pulp prices and materially adversely affect our results of operations, margin, and profitability.

Demand for each of pulp and lumber has historically been determined primarily by general global macroeconomicmacro-economic conditions and has been closely tied to overall business activity. NBSK pulpPulp prices have been and are likely to continue to be volatile and can fluctuate widely over time. Between 20052009 and 2015,2018, European list prices for NBSK pulp have fluctuated between a low of approximately $575 per ADMT in 2009 to a high of $1,030$1,230 per ADMT in 2011.2018. In the same period, the average North American NBHK price has fluctuated between a low of $520 per ADMT in 2009 to a high of $1,235 per ADMT in 2018.

Our mills and operations voluntarily subject themselves to third-party certification as to compliance with internationally recognized, sustainable management standards because end use paper and lumber customers have shown an increased interest in understanding the origin of products they purchase. Demand for our products could be adversely affected if we, or our suppliers, are unable to achieve compliance or are perceived by the public as failing to comply with these standards or if our customers require compliance with alternate standards for which our operations are not certified.

A producer’s actual sales price realizations are list prices net of customer discounts, rebates and other selling concessions. Over the last three years, these have increased for pulp sales as pulp producers compete for customers and sales. Our sales price realizations may also be affected by NBSK price movements between the order and shipment dates.

Accordingly, prices for pulp and lumber are driven by many factors outside our control, and we have little influence over the timing and extent of price changes, which are often volatile. Because market conditions beyond our control determine the priceprices for pulp and lumber, prices may fall below our cash production costs, requiring us to either incur short-term losses on product sales or cease production at one or more of our mills. Therefore, our profitability depends on managing our cost structure, particularly raw materials which represent a significant component of our operating costs and can fluctuate based upon

(39)


factors beyond our

control. If the prices of our products decline, or if prices for our raw materials increase, or both, our results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

A weakening of the global economy, including capital and credit markets, could adversely affect our business and financial results and have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and capital resources.

As demand for pulpour products has principally historically been determined by general global macroeconomicmacro-economic activities, demand and prices for our productproducts have historically decreased substantially during economic slowdowns. A significant economic downturn may affect our sales and profitability. Further, our suppliers and customers may also be adversely affected by an economic downturn. Additionally, restricted credit and capital availability restrains our customers’ ability or willingness to purchase our products, resulting in lower revenues. Depending on their severity and duration, the effects and consequences of a global economic downturn could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and capital resources, including our ability to raise capital, if needed, and otherwise negatively impact our business and financial results.

Our level of indebtedness could negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

As of December 31, 2015,2018, we hadhave approximately $638.0$1,041.4 million of indebtedness outstanding. We may also incur additional indebtedness in the future. Our high debt levels may have important consequences for us, including, but not limited to the following:

 

our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, general corporate and other purposes or to fund future operations may not be available on terms favorable to us or at all;

 

a significant amount of our operating cash flow is dedicated to the payment of interest and principal on our indebtedness, thereby diminishing funds that would otherwise be available for our operations and for other purposes;

 

increasing our vulnerability to current and future adverse economic and industry conditions;

 

a substantial decrease in net operating cash flows or increase in our expenses could make it more difficult for us to meet our debt service requirements, which could force us to modify our operations;

 

our leveraged capital structure may place us at a competitive disadvantage by hindering our ability to adjust rapidly to changing market conditions or by making us vulnerable to a downturn in our business or the economy in general;

 

causing us to offer debt or equity securities on terms that may not be favorable to us or our shareholders;

 

limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes and opportunities in our business and our industry; and

 

our level of indebtedness increases the possibility that we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay the principal or interest due in respect of our indebtedness.

The indentures that govern our 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes,and our bank credit facilities contain restrictive covenants which impose operating and other restrictions on us and our subsidiaries. These restrictions will affect, and in many respects will limit or prohibit, our ability to, among other things, incur or guarantee additional indebtedness, pay dividends or make distributions on capital stock or redeem or repurchase capital stock, make investments or acquisitions, create liens and enter into mergers,

consolidations or transactions with affiliates. The terms of our indebtedness also restrict our ability to sell certain assets, apply the proceeds of such sales and reinvest in our business.

(40)


Certain of the agreements governing our indebtedness have covenants that require us to maintain prescribed financial ratios and tests. Failure to comply with such covenants could result in events of default and could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.

Our ability to repay or refinance our indebtedness will depend on our future financial and operating performance. Our performance, in turn, will be subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions, as well as financial, business, legislative, regulatory, industry and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Our ability to meet our future debt service and other obligations may depend in significant part on the extent to which we can successfully implement our business strategy. We cannot assure you that we will be able to implement our strategy fully or that the anticipated results of our strategy will be realized. Over the next several years, we will require financing to refinance maturing debt obligations (unless extended), and such refinancing may not be available on favorable terms or at all.

Cyclical fluctuations in the price and supply of our raw materials, particularly fiber, could adversely affect our business.

Our main raw material which is fiber in the form of wood chips, and pulp logs representsand sawlogs. Fiber represented approximately 62%57% of our pulp cash production costs.costs and approximately 80% of our lumber cash production costs in 2018. Fiber is a commodity and both prices and supply are cyclical. Fiber pricing is subject to regional market influences and our costs of fiber may increase in a region as a result of local market shifts. The cost of wood chips, and pulp logs and sawlogs is primarily affected by the supply and demand for lumber. Demand for these raw materials is generally determined by the volume of pulp and paper products and wood products produced globally and regionally. Governmental regulations related to the environment, forest stewardship and “green”green or renewable energy can also affect the supply of fiber. In Germany, governmental initiatives to increase the supply of renewable energy have led to more renewable energy projects in Europe, including Germany. Demand for wood residuals from such energy producers, combined with lower harvesting rates, has generally put upward pressure on prices for wood residuals, such as wood chips, in Germany and its neighboring countries. This has resulted in higher fiber costs for our German pulp mills and such trend could continue to put further upward pressure on wood chip prices. Wood chip supply in Germany was generally stable during the course of 2014 and 2015last three years due to stable sawmill production and lower demand from pellet producers and board manufacturers; however, there is no assurance that wood chip supply will continue to be stable or that supply will not be reduced or that fiber costs will not increase in the future.

Similarly, North American sawmill activity declined significantly during the recession, reducing the supply of chips and availability of pulp logs to pulp mills, including our Celgar mill. Additionally, North American energy producers are exploring the viability of renewable energy initiatives and governmental initiatives in this field are increasing, all of which could lead to higher demand for sawmill residual fiber, including chips. A recovery in U.S. housing starts, which commenced in the latter part of 2012 and has continued through 2015,the first half of 2018, resulted in increased sawmill activity. This increased the supply of wood chips for the Celgar mill and reduced its need for pulp logs, which are generally a higher cost for the mill than wood chips. Sawmill activity was stableHowever, a slowdown in Canada during 2014sawmilling activities that commenced in the second half of 2018 reduced the availability of both wood chips and 2015; however, therepulp logs and put upward pressure on fiber costs. There is no assurance that sawmill activity will continue to remainimprove or become stable or that fiber prices will not increase in the future.

The 2006 Softwood Lumber Agreement, which governed softwood lumber exports from Canada to the United States, expired in 2015, and aone-year post-expiration period during which the United States agreed not to impose trade sanctions expired in October 2016. In November 2016, a petition was filed by a coalition of U.S. lumber producers to the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission requesting an investigation into alleged subsidies provided to Canadian lumber producers. In December 2017, the U.S. International Trade Commission published its final injury determination. In late

(41)


2017, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its final countervailing and anti-dumping duty rates, which set out a countervailing duty of 14.19% and an anti-dumping rate of 6.04% for “all other” Canadian lumber producers. The U.S. Department of Commerce also concluded that critical circumstances did not exist for countervailing duties, but did exist for anti-dumping duties. The Canadian forest products industry and Canadian federal and provincial governments have denied the U.S. Department of Commerce’s allegations. Canada has announced an appeal of the duties to the North American Free Trade Agreement appeal panel and the World Trade Organization. It is uncertain when or if the United States and Canada may settle a new agreement and what terms or restrictions it may contain. Any duties or other restrictions imposed on Canadian softwood lumber exports by the United States could negatively impact Canadian sawmill production in our Canadian mills’ supply area and result in reduced availability and increased costs for wood chips for the mill. While we believe this may be partially offset by increased wood chip supply from U.S. sawmills and pulp log availability, we cannot currently predict the overall effect on our Canadian mills’ overall fiber costs.

Availability of fiber may be further limited by adverse responses to and prevention of wildfires, weather, insect infestation, disease, ice storms, wind storms, flooding and other natural causes. In addition, the quantity, quality and price of fiber we receive could be affected byman-made causes such as those resulting from industrial disputes, material curtailments or shut-down of operations by suppliers,

government orders and legislation (including new taxes or tariffs). Any or a combination of these can affect fiber prices in a region.

The cyclical nature of pricing for fiber represents a potential risk to our profit margins if pulp and lumber producers are unable to pass along price increases to their customers or we cannot offset such costs through higher prices for our surplus energy.

WeOther than the renewable forest licenses of MPR, we do not own any timberlands or have any material long-term governmental timber concessions and weconcessions. We also currently have few long-term fiber contracts at our German operations. Fiber is available from a number of suppliers and we have not historically experienced material supply interruptions or substantial sustained price increases. However, our requirements have increased and may continue to do so as we expand capacity through capital projects or other efficiency measures at our mills. As a result, we may not be able to purchase sufficient quantities of these raw materials to meet our production requirements at prices acceptable to us during times of tight supply. An insufficient supply of fiber or reduction in the quality of fiber we receive would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.flows.

In addition to the supply of fiber, we are, to a lesser extent, dependent on the supply of certain chemicals and other inputs used in our production facilities. Any disruption in the supply of these chemicals or other inputs could affect our ability to meet customer demand in a timely manner and could harm our reputation. Any material increase in the cost of these chemicals or other inputs could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We face intense competition in our markets.

We sell our pulp and lumber globally, with a large percentage sold in Europe, Asia and North America. The markets for pulp and lumber are highly competitive. A number of other global companies compete in each of these markets and no company holds a dominant position. Our pulp isand lumber are considered a commoditycommodities because many companies produce similar and largely standardized products. As a result, the primary basis for competition in our markets has been price. Many of our competitors have greater resources and lower leverage than we do and may be able to adapt more quickly to industry or market changes or devote greater resources to the sale of products than we can. There can be no assurance that we will continue to be competitive in the future. Prices for our products are affected by many factors outside of our control and we have no influence over the timing and extent of price changes, which are often

(42)


volatile. Our ability to maintain satisfactory marginmargins depends, in large part, on managing our costs, particularly raw material and energy costs which represent significant components of our operating costs and can fluctuate based upon factors beyond our control.

The globalGlobal pulp market hasand lumber markets have historically been characterized by considerable swings in prices which have and will result in variability in our earnings.

We are exposed to currency exchange rate fluctuations.

We have manufacturing operations in Germany and Canada. Most of the operating costs and expenses of our German mills are incurred in euros and those of our Celgar millCanadian mills in Canadian dollars. However, the majority of our sales are in products quoted in dollars. Our results of operations and financial condition are reported in dollars. As a result, our costs generally benefit from a strengthening dollar but are adversely affected by a decrease in the value of the dollar relative to the euro and to the Canadian dollar. Such shiftsdeclines in currenciesthe dollar relative to the euro and the Canadian dollar reduce our operating margins and the

cash flow available to fund our operations and to service our debt. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Further, while a strengthening dollar generally lowers our costs and expenses, it increases the cost of NBSK pulp to our customers and generally puts downward pressure on pulp prices and reduces our European lumber, energy and chemical sales revenues as they are sold in euros and Canadian dollars.

Although we report in dollars, we hold certain assets and liabilities, including our mills, in euros and Canadian dollars. We translate foreign denominated assets and liabilities into dollars at the rate of exchange on the balance sheet date. Equity accounts are translated using historical exchange rates. Unrealized gains or losses from these translations are recorded in our Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)other comprehensive income (loss) and do not affect our net earnings, operating income or Operating EBITDA.

Certain intercompany dollar advances between Mercer Inc. and its foreign subsidiaries are held in euros.euros and Canadian dollars and certain foreign subsidiaries hold some cash and other balances in dollars. When such advances and cash and other balances are translated by thethese subsidiaries into dollarsthe applicable local currency at the end of each reporting period, the gains or losses thereon are reflected in net earnings.

Political uncertainty, the rise of populist political parties and an increase in trade protectionism could have a material adverse effect on global macro-economic activities and trade and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The current rise of populist political parties, economic nationalist sentiments and trade protectionism has led to increasing political uncertainty and unpredictability throughout the world. In 2016, the United Kingdom held a referendum at which the electorate voted to leave the Council of the European Union and is currently seeking to settle the terms of its departure and future trade relationship with the European Union. Currently there is no certainty as to what terms may be implemented, if at all, and the overall effect on European and world economies. The current U.S. presidential administration has imposed tariffs on various goods from various countries, including China and announced intentions to impose further, more significant tariffs. These potential developments, market perceptions concerning these and related issues and the attendant regulatory uncertainty regarding, for example, the posture of governments with respect to international trade, could have a material adverse effect on global trade and economic growth which, in turn, can adversely affect our business, results of operation and financial condition.

The rise of populist political parties in some countries and the dominance of single-party political power in other countries may also lead to increased trade barriers, trade protectionism and restrictions on trade. Increased trade protectionism could materially adversely affect our business. If the current continuing global recovery is undermined by downside risks and there is a prolonged economic downturn,

(43)


governments, especially populist governments, may turn to trade barriers to protect their domestic industries against imports, thereby depressing demand. Changes in U.S. trade policy, such as the announcement of unilateral tariffs on imported products, have already triggered retaliatory actions from affected countries, resulting in “trade wars” that could have a material adverse effect on global trade and economic growth.

Protectionist developments, or the perception they may occur, may have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions, and may significantly reduce global trade. Increasing trade protectionism in the markets could increase the risks associated with exporting goods to such markets. These developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to extensive environmental regulation and we could incur substantial costs as a result of compliance with, violations of or liabilities under applicable environmental laws and regulations.

Our operations are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations as well as permits, guidelines and policies relating to the protection of the environment. These laws, regulations, permits, guidelines and policies govern, among other things:

 

unlawful discharges to land, air, water and sewers;

 

waste collection, storage, transportation and disposal;

 

hazardous waste;

 

dangerous goods and hazardous materials and the collection, storage, transportation and disposal of such substances;

 

theclean-up of unlawful discharges;

 

land use planning;

 

municipal zoning; and

 

employee health and safety.

In addition, as a result of our operations, we may be subject to remediation,clean-up or other administrative orders or amendments to our operating permits, and we may be involved from time to time in administrative and judicial proceedings or inquiries. Future orders, proceedings or inquiries could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Environmental laws and land use laws and regulations are constantly changing. New regulations or the increased enforcement of existing laws could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. In addition, compliance with regulatory requirements is expensive, at times requiring the replacement, enhancement or modification of equipment, facilities or operations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our profitability by offsetting any increased costs of complying with future regulatory requirements.

We are subject to liability for environmental damage at the facilities that we own or operate, including damage to neighboring landowners, residents or employees, particularly as a result of the

contamination of soil, groundwater or surface water and especially drinking water. The costs of such liabilities can be substantial. Our potential liability may include damages resulting from conditions existing before we purchased or operated these facilities. We may also be subject to liability for any offsite environmental contamination caused by pollutants or hazardous substances that we or our predecessors arranged to transport, treat or dispose of at other locations. In addition, we may be held legally responsible for liabilities as a successor owner of businesses that we acquire or have acquired. Except for Stendal, our facilities have been operating for decades and we have not done invasive testing to determine whether or to what extent any such environmental contamination exists. As a result, these businesses may have liabilities for conditions that we discover or that become apparent, including liabilities arising fromnon-compliance

(44)


with environmental laws by prior owners. Because of the limited availability of insurance coverage for environmental liability, any substantial liability for environmental damage could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We have incurred, and we expect to continue to incur, significant capital, operating and other expenditures as a result of complying with applicable environmental laws and regulations.

Further, enactment of new environmental laws or regulations, changes in existing laws or regulations or the interpretation of these laws and regulations might require significant capital expenditures. We may be unable to generate sufficient funds or access other sources of capital to fund unforeseen environmental liabilities or expenditures.

Our business is subject to risks associated with climate change and social and government responses thereto.

Our operations and those of our suppliers are subject to climate change variations which can impact the productivity of forests, the abundance of species, harvest levels and lumber. Further, over the last few years, changing weather patterns and climate conditions due to natural andman-made causes have added to the frequency and unpredictability of natural disasters like earthquakes, storms, wildfires and wind, snow and ice storms. One or a combination of these factors could adversely affect our fiber supply which is our largest cash production cost. There are differing scientific studies and opinions relating to the severity, extent and speed at which climate change is or may be occurring around the world. As a result, we are currently unable to identify and predict all of the specific consequences of climate change on our business and operations.

Further, governmental initiatives in response to climate change also have an impact on operations. There continue to be numerous international, country level and regional initiatives to address global and country specific climate issues.

In Germany, government and social focus on and demand for “carbon neutral”carbon neutral or “green”green energy has created greater demand and competition for the wood residuals or fiber that is consumed by our pulp mills as part of their production process.processes. This has helped drive up the cost of fiber for German mills. In addition, further or new governmental initiatives or legislation may also increase both the demand and prices for wood residuals. As governments pursue “green”green energy initiatives, they may implement financial, tax, pricing or other legislated incentives for renewable energy producers that “cannibalize” or materially adversely affect fiber supplies for existing traditional users, such as lumber and pulp and paper producers.

Such additional demand for wood residuals and/or governmental initiatives may materially increase the competition and prices for wood residuals over time. This could increase our fiber costs and/or restrict our ability to acquire fiber at competitive prices or at all during times of shortages. If our fiber costs increase and we cannot pass on these costs to our customers or offset them through higher prices for our sales of surplus energy, it will negatively affect our operating margins, results of operations and financial position. If we cannot obtain the fiber required to operate our mills, we may have to curtail and/or shut down production. This could have a material adverse effect on operations, financial results and financial position.

Other potential risks to our business from climate change include:

 

a greater susceptibility of northern softwood forests to disease, fire and insect infestation, which could diminish fiber availability;

 

the disruption of transportation systems and power supply lines due to more severe storms;

 

the loss of fresh water transportation for logs and pulp due to lower water levels;

 

(45)


decreases in the quantity and quality of processed water for our mill operations;

 

the loss of northern softwood forests in areas in sufficient proximity to our mills to competitively acquire fiber; and

 

lower harvest levels decreasing the supply of harvestable timber and, as a consequence, wood residuals.

The occurrence of any or a combination of these events could have a material adverse effect on our operations and/or financial results.

Our new ERP system may cost more than expected, be delayed, fail to perform as planned and interrupt operational transactions during and following the implementation, which could adversely affect our operations and results of operations.

In January 2014, we commenced the implementation of a new ERP solution to replace our existing business software applications at a total estimated cost of $12.0 million. The project was designed to be completed in stages over the following two years. Such projects are inherently complex, resource intensive and lengthy. As a result, we could experience unplanned or unforeseen issues that could adversely affect the project, our business and/or our results of operations, including:

costs of implementation that materially exceed our expectation;

delays in the go-live of one or more of the stages of the project, resulting in additional costs or time for completion;

errors in implementation resulting in errors in the commencement or reporting of business transactions;

failure in the deliverables of our key partners, suppliers and implementation advisors, resulting in an inferior product, reduced business efficacy and the project not providing expected benefits;

deficiencies in the training of employees in the use of the new solution, resulting in errors in the recording of data or transactions, leading to delays in input deliveries and production impairment;

a control failure during or post implementation, which may result in a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting; and

other implementation issues leading to delays and impacts on our business.

We periodically use derivatives to manage certain risks which has caused significant fluctuations in our operating results.

In 2002, Stendal entered into the Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract to fix interest payments under its indebtedness until 2017, which prevented Stendal from benefiting from the general decline in interest

rates that ensued. Because we effectively fixed the rate on Stendal’s indebtedness under such contract, the value of our derivative position moves inversely to interest rates. The Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract remains in place after we refinanced Stendal’s indebtedness in 2014.

We also periodically use other derivatives related to currency exchange rates, pulp prices and energy prices.

We record unrealized gains or losses on our derivative instruments when they are marked to market at the end of each reporting period and realized gains or losses on them when they are settled. These unrealized and realized gains and losses can materially impact our operating results for any reporting period.

If any of the variety of instruments and strategies we utilize is not effective, we may incur losses which may have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. The purpose of our derivative activity may also be considered speculative in nature; we do not use these instruments with respect to any pre-set percentage of revenues or other formula, but either to augment our potential gains or reduce our potential losses depending on our perception of future economic events and developments.

Our operations require substantial capital and we may be unable to maintain adequate capital resources to provide for such capital requirements.

Our business is capital intensive and requires that we regularly incur capital expenditures to maintain our equipment, improve efficiencies and, as a result of changes to environmental regulations that require capital expenditures, bring our operations into compliance with such regulations. In addition, we may approve projects in the future that will require significant capital expenditures. Increased capital expenditures could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and our ability to satisfy our debt obligations. If our available cash resources and cash generated from operations are not sufficient to fund our operating needs and capital expenditures, we would have to obtain additional funds from borrowings or other available sources or reduce or delay our capital expenditures. Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health, limit our operations or impair our ability to raise additional capital. If this occurs, we may not be able to obtain additional funds on favorable terms or at all. If we cannot maintain or upgrade our equipment as may be required from time to time, we may become unable to manufacture products that compete effectively. An inability to make required capital expenditures in a timely fashion could have a material adverse effect on our growth, business, financial condition or results of operations.

FutureOur acquisition of MPR and other future acquisitions may result in additional risks and uncertainties in our business.

Our future performance will depend in part on whether we can integrate MPR with our operations in an effective and efficient manner. The acquisition of MPR is larger than the other acquisitions we have made. Integrating MPR with our operations will be a complex, time consuming and potentially expensive process.

In order to grow our business, we may seek to acquire additional assets or companies. Our ability to pursue selective and accretive acquisitions will be dependent on management’s ability to identify, acquire and develop suitable acquisition targets in both new and existing markets. In pursuing acquisition and investment opportunities, we face competition from other companies having similar growth strategies, many of which may have substantially greater resources than us. Competition for these acquisitions or investment targets could result in increased acquisition or investment prices, higher risks and a diminished pool of businesses or assets available for acquisition.

Acquisitions also frequently result in recording of goodwill and other intangible assets, which are subject to potential impairments in the future that could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Furthermore, the costs of integrating acquired businesses (including restructuring charges associated with the acquisitions, as well as other acquisition costs, such as accounting fees, legal fees and investment banking fees) could significantly impact our operating results.

Although we perform diligence on the businesses we purchase, in light of the circumstances of each transaction, an unavoidable level of risk remains regarding the actual condition of these businesses. We may

(46)


not be able to ascertain the value or understand the potential liabilities of the acquired businesses and their operations until we assume operating control of the assets and operations of these businesses.

Furthermore, anyour acquisition of MPR and other future acquisitions of businesses or facilities could entail a number of risks, including:

 

problems with the effective integrationdiversion of operations;management’s attention from our ongoing business;

 

inability to maintain key pre-acquisition business relationships;difficulty integrating the operations, including financial and accounting functions, sales and marketing procedures, technology and other corporate administrative functions of the combined operations;

 

increased operating costs;

 

exposure to substantial unanticipated liabilities;

difficulty in realizing projected synergies, efficiencies and cost savings;

difficulty maintaining relationships with present and potential customers, distributors and suppliers due to uncertainties regarding service, production quality and prices; and

 

difficulties in realizing projected efficiencies, synergiesproblems retaining key employees.

All of the pulp produced by the MPR mills was previously sold by a third-party agent that was a shareholder of MPR. We intend to take over a majority of its sales functions over time. Our internal sales staff and cost savings.third-party agents may not be able to sell such pulp production on terms as favorable as those achieved by the existing agent.

We cannot guarantee that we will successfully integrate MPR with our operations. If we are unable to address any of these risks, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

In addition, geographic and other expansions, acquisitions or joint ventures may require significant managerial attention, which may be diverted from our other operations. If we are unsuccessful in overcoming these risks, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The operations of MPR are subject to their own risks, which we may not be able to manage successfully.

The financial results of MPR are subject to many of the same factors that affect our financial condition and results of operations, including the cyclical nature of the pulp business, exposure to interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations, exposure to liability for environmental damage, the competitive nature of our markets and regulatory, legislative and judicial developments. Additionally, the operations of MPR are subject to other factors that are unique to its business, such as obligations to comply with laws and regulations related to forest management and timber practices. The financial results of MPR could be materially adversely affected as a result of any of these or other related factors, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition on a consolidated basis.

In addition, MPR’s 50% ownership interest in the Cariboo mill is through an unincorporated joint venture. The ownership and operation of the Cariboo mill is subject to the agreement underlying the joint venture and itsday-to-day operations are principally conducted by MPR’s joint venture partner. Joint ventures generally involve special risks, including that the business and strategic interests of the joint venture partner and MPR may not coincide or that the joint venture partner may be unable to meet its economic or other obligations thereunder. MPR has limited control over the actions of the joint venture

(47)


partner in respect of the Cariboo mill, including anynon-performance, default or bankruptcy of such party. Anynon-performance by MPR’s joint venture partner or other actions taken by the joint venture partner in connection with theday-to-day operation of the Cariboo mill may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to enhance the operating performance and financial results or lower the costs of MPR’s operations as planned.

While we believe that there are a number of opportunities to reduce operating costs, increase production and improve the financial results of MPR, we may not be able to achieve our planned operating improvements, cost reductions, capacity increases or improved price realizations in our expected time periods, if at all. In addition, some of the improvements that we hope to achieve depend upon capital expenditure projects that we plan to implement at the Peace River mill. Such capital projects may not be completed in our expected time periods, if at all, may not achieve the results that we have estimated or may have a cost substantially in excess of our planned amounts.

Fluctuations in prices and demand for lumber could adversely affect our business.

The financial performance of the Friesau mill depends on the demand for and selling price of lumber, which is subject to significant fluctuations. The markets for lumber are highly volatile and are affected by economic conditions in Europe, Asia and the United States, the strength of housing markets in such regions, the growing importance of the Asian market, changes in industry production capacity, changes in inventory levels and other factors beyond our control. Additionally, interest rates have a significant impact on residential construction and renovation activity, which in turn influence the demand for and price of lumber.

Adverse housing market conditions may increase the credit risk from customers of our wood products segment.

Our wood products segment generally extends credit to customers who are generally susceptible to the same economic business risks that we are. Unfavorable housing market conditions could result in financial failures of one or more of such customers. If such customers’ financial position becomes impaired, our ability to fully collect receivables from such customers could be impaired and negatively affect our operating results, cash flows and liquidity.

Our wood products segment lumber products are vulnerable to declines in demand due to competing technologies or materials.

Our lumber products may compete with alternative products. For example, plastic, wood/plastic or composite materials may be used by builders as alternatives to the lumber products produced by our wood products segment. Changes in the prices for oil, chemicals and other products can change the competitive position of our wood products segment lumber products relative to available alternatives and could increase substitution of those products for our wood products segment products. If use of these alternative products grows, demand for and pricing of our wood products segment products could be adversely affected.

Changes in credit ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations could adversely affect our cost of financing and have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities.

Credit rating agencies rate our debt securities on factors that include our operating results, actions that we take, their view of the general outlook for our industry and their view of the general outlook for the economy. Actions taken by the rating agencies can include maintaining, upgrading or downgrading the current rating or placing the company on a watch list for possible future downgrading. Downgrading the

(48)


credit rating of our debt securities or placing us on a watch list for possible future downgrading could limit our access to the credit markets, increase our cost of financing and have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities, including the 2019 and 2022our Senior Notes.

We rely on government grants and participate in German statutory energy programs.

We currently benefit from a subsidized capital expenditure program as a result of German federal and state government grants. Should either the German federal or state governments be prohibited from honoring legislative grants, or should we be required to repay any such legislative grants, this may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

Since 2005, ourOur German mills have benefited from sales of emission allowances under the EU ETS. Since our German mills receive stipulated special tariffs undersell surplus green energy at fixed prices or “tariffs” pursuant to the Renewable Energy Act, the amount of emissions allowances granted to our German mills under the EU ETS has been reduced. Additionally, such emission allowances are subject to statutory amendment or change in the future.Act.

In 2014, in response to an investigation by the European Commission into whether portions of the Renewable Energy Act constituted unpermitted state aid, the German government amended the Renewable Energy Act. After such amendment,same, which amendments permitted our German mills continuedto continue to sell “green”green energy into the market at stipulated prices or “tariffs”. Furthermore, they and were exempted, as “existing installations”, from certain surcharges on the consumption of energy that they generate, or “auto-generation”. This exemption is set to be re-considered in 2017.

The German government has publicly announced that it intends to further amend

amended the Renewable Energy Act in 2016effective January 1, 2017, so that funding for renewable energy is to be allocated through an auction system, starting in 2017. The auction system is expected to be primarily designed to create a competitive bidding process for new installations of wind, solar and solarbiomass energy. WhileOur Friesau mill’s tariff expires in 2029. However, the current funding system is expectedamendments provide that existing pulp mills, including our German pulp mills, are ineligible for such auction process and instead will have their tariffs renewed upon expiry of their initial20-year terms for a further10-year period, based upon the price received in the last year prior to continuerenewal, regressing at a rate of 8% per annum. Currently we expect our Rosenthal mill’s initial20-year tariff to applyexpire on December 31, 2020 and our Stendal mill’s initial20-year tariff to biomass energy,expire on December 31, 2024. Such10-year extensions for such pulp mills have been notified by the currentGerman government to the European Commission for review for compliance with applicable state aid rules. We have been advised by German governmental paper proposes to develop tender mechanisms for biomass installations, for which fundingauthorities that such extensions may not be permitted under the current system has run out. At this time, the final proposedEU rules. As a result, we cannot currently predict whether such promulgated amendments to the Renewable Energy Act and in particular those that affect biomass producers like our German mills, havewill become effective. If they do not been released. As a result,become effective, we cannot predict what further resulting amendments the German government may put into effect of any promulgated amendments to the Renewable Energy Actand their effect on our German mills’ sale or consumption of energy.energy after the expiry of their current terms on December 31, 2020 for Rosenthal and December 31, 2024 for Stendal.

Our costs of energy for our pulp operations in Germany could increase in the event that the auto-generation surcharge exemption is removed or reduced in the future. Additionally, if the stipulated tariffs for energy sold by our German mills are reduced in the future as a result of legislative changes,or sales are on an auction or market basis, we cannot provide assurances that our energy sales in Germany may notwill be as profitable. Any of the foregoing situations or any combination of them could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We are subject to risks related to our employees.

The majority of our employees are unionized and we have collective agreements in place with our employees at all of our mills.mills, other than the Peace River mill which isnon-union. Although we have not experienced any material work stoppages in the past, there can be no assurance that we will be able to negotiate acceptable collective agreements or other satisfactory arrangements with our employees upon the expiration of our collective agreements. This could result in a strike or work stoppage by the affected workers. The registration or renewal of the collective agreements or the outcome of our wage negotiations could result in higher wages or benefits paid to union members. Additionally, changing demographics may make it more difficult for us to recruit skilled employees in the future. Accordingly, we could experience a significant disruption of our operations or higher on-goingongoing labor costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.flows. In addition, whenever we seek to reduce workforce at any of our mills, the affected mill’s labor force could seek to hinder or delay such actions, we could incur material severance or other costs and our operations could be disrupted.

(49)


We are dependent on key personnel.

Our future success depends, to a large extent, on the efforts and abilities of our executive and senior mill operating officers. Such officers are industry professionals, many of whom have operated through multiple business cycles. Our officers play an integral role in, among other things:

sales and marketing;

reducing operating costs;

identifying capital projects which provide a high rate of return; and

prioritizing expenditures and maintaining employee relations.

The loss of one or more of our officers could make us less competitive, in these areas which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We do not maintain any key person life insurance for any of our executive or senior mill operating officers.

We may experience material disruptions to our production.

A material disruption at one of our manufacturing facilities could prevent us from meeting customer demand, reduce our pulp, lumber and energy sales and/or negatively impact our results of operations. Any of our mills could cease operations unexpectedly due to a number of events, including:

 

unscheduled maintenance outages;

 

prolonged power failures;

 

equipment failure;

 

employee errors or failures;

 

design error or employee or contractor error;

 

chemical spill or release;

 

explosion of a boiler;

 

disruptions in the transportation infrastructure, including roads, bridges, railway tracks, tunnels, canals and ports;

 

fires, floods, earthquakes, windstorms, pest infestations, severe weather conditions or other natural catastrophes;catastrophes affecting our production of goods or the supply of raw materials like fiber;

 

prolonged supply disruption of major inputs;

 

labor difficulties;

 

capital projects that require temporary cost increases or curtailment of production; and

 

other operational problems.

Any such downtime or facility damage could prevent us from meeting customer demand for our products and/or require us to make unplanned capital expenditures. If any of our facilities were to incur significant downtime, our ability to meet our production capacity targets and satisfy customer requirements would be impaired and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

If our long-lived assets become impaired, we may be required to recordnon-cash impairment charges that could have a material impact on our results of operations.

We review the carrying value of long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Should the markets

(50)


for our products deteriorate or should we decide to invest capital differently or should other cash flow assumptions change, it is possible that we will be required to recordnon-cash impairment charges in the future that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We may incur losses as a result of unforeseen or catastrophic events, including the emergence of a pandemic, terrorist attacks or natural disasters.

The occurrence of unforeseen or catastrophic events, including the emergence of a pandemic or other widespread health emergency (or concerns over the possibility of such an emergency), terrorist attacks or natural disasters, could create economic and financial disruptions and could lead to operational difficulties (including travel limitations) that could impair our ability to manage or operate our business and adversely affect our results of operations.

Our insurance coverage may not be adequate.

We have obtained insurance coverage that we believe would ordinarily be maintained by an operator of facilities similar to our mills. Our insurance is subject to various limits and exclusions. Damage or destruction to our facilities could result in claims that are excluded by, or exceed the limits of, our insurance coverage. Additionally, the weak global and financial markets have also reduced the availability and extent of credit insurance for our customers. If we cannot obtain adequate credit insurance for our customers, we may be forced to amend or curtail our planned operations which could negatively impact our sales revenues, results of operations and financial position.

We rely on third parties for transportation services.

Our business primarily relies upon third parties for the transportation of pulp and lumber to our customers, as well as for the delivery of our raw materials to our mills. Our pulp, lumber and raw materials are principally transported by truck, barge, rail andsea-going vessels, all of which are highly regulated. Increases in transportation rates can also materially adversely affect our results of operations.

Further, if our transportation providers fail to deliver our pulp or lumber in a timely manner, it could negatively impact our customer relationships and we may be unable to sell it at full value. If our transportation providers fail to deliver our raw materials in a timely fashion, we may be unable to manufacture pulp or lumber in response to customer orders.orders or sell them at full value. Also, if any of our transportation providers were to cease operations, we may be unable to replace them at a reasonable cost. The occurrence of any of the foregoing events could materially adversely affect our results of operations.

We periodically use derivatives to manage certain risks which could cause significant fluctuations in our operating results.

We periodically use derivatives related to currency exchange rates, interest rates, commodity prices and energy prices.

We record unrealized gains or losses on our derivative instruments when they are marked to market at the end of each reporting period and realized gains or losses on them when they are settled. These unrealized and realized gains and losses can materially impact our operating results for any reporting period.

If any of the variety of instruments and strategies we utilize is not effective, we may incur losses which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The purpose of our derivative activity may also be considered speculative in nature; we do not use these instruments with respect to anypre-set percentage of revenues or other formula, but either to

(51)


augment our potential gains or reduce our potential losses depending on our perception of future economic events and developments.

Failures or security breaches of our information technology systems could disrupt our operations and negatively impact our business.

We use information technologies to securely manage our operations and various business functions. We rely on various technologies to process, store and report on our business and to communicate electronically between our facilities, personnel, customers and suppliers.suppliers as well as for administrative functions and many of such technology systems are independent on one another for their functionality. We also use information technologies to process financial information and results of operations for internal reporting purposes and to comply with regulatory, legal and tax requirements. We rely on third party providers for some of these information technologies and support. Our ability to effectively manage our business and coordinate the production, distribution and sale of our products is highly dependent on our technology systems. Despite our security design and controls and other operational safeguards, and those of our third party providers, our information technology systems may be vulnerable to a variety of interruptions, including during the process of upgrading or replacing hardware, software, databases or components thereof, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, cyber-attacks, hackers, unauthorized access attempts and other security issues or may be breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such interruption or breach could result in operational disruptions or the misappropriation of sensitive data that could subject us to civil and criminal penalties, litigation or have a negative impact on our reputation. There can be no assurance that such disruptions or misappropriations and the resulting repercussions will not negatively impact our cash flows and materially affect our results of operations or financial condition.

In addition, many of our information technology systems, such as those we use for administrative functions, including human resources, payroll, accounting and internal and external communications, as well as the information technology systems of our third-party business partners and service providers, whether cloud-based or hosted in proprietary servers, contain personal, financial or other information that is entrusted to us by our customers and personnel. Many of our information technology systems also contain proprietary and other confidential information related to our business, such as business plans and research and development initiatives. To the extent we or a third party were to experience a material breach of our or such third party’s information technology systems that result in the unauthorized access, theft, use, destruction or other compromises of our customers’ or personnel’s data or confidential information stored in such systems, including through cyber-attacks or other external or internal methods could result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, and subject us to litigation and governmental investigations and proceedings, any of which could result in our exposure to material liability. For example, the European Union adopted a new regulation that became effective in May 2018, called the General Data Protection Regulation, or “GDPR”, which requires companies to meet new requirements regarding the handling of personal data, including its use, protection and transfer and the ability of persons whose data is stored to correct or delete such data about themselves. Failure to meet the GDPR requirements could result in penalties of up to 4% of annual worldwide revenue. The GDPR also confers a private right of action on certain individuals and associations.

(52)


The price of our common stock may be volatile.

The market price of our common stock may be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including those described above and the following:

 

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results or our competitors’ operating results;

 

announcements by us or our competitors of new products, capacity changes, significant contracts, acquisitions or strategic investments;

our growth rate and our competitors’ growth rates;

 

the financial market and general economic conditions;

 

changes in stock market analyst recommendations regarding us, our competitors or the forest products industry generally or lack of analyst coverage of our common stock;

 

sales of common stock by our executive officers, directors and significant shareholders;

 

changes in accounting principles; and

 

changes in laws and regulations.

In addition, there has been significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of companies operating in the forest products industry that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. Some companies that have had volatile market prices for their securities have had securities litigation brought against them. If litigation of this type is brought against us, it could result in substantial costs and would divert management’s attention and resources.

A small number of our shareholders could significantly influence our business.

There are a few significant shareholders of our common stock who own a substantial percentage of the outstanding shares of our common stock. These few significant shareholders, either individually or acting together, may be able to exercise significant influence over matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of the company or our assets. This concentration of ownership may make it more difficult for other shareholders to effect substantial changes in the company, may have the effect of delaying, preventing or expediting, as the case may be, a change in control of the company and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Further, the possibility that one or more of these significant shareholders may sell all or a large portion of their common stock in a short period of time could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. Also, the interests of these few shareholders may not be in the best interests of all shareholders.

Our international sales and operations are subject to applicable laws relating to trade, export controls and foreign corrupt practices, the violation of which could adversely affect our operations.

As a result of our international sales and operations, we are subject to trade and economic sanctions and other restrictions imposed by the United States, Canada and other governments or organizations, including prohibitions in the U.S.United States against foreign competitors’ (including our operating subsidiaries) receipt of certain unlawful foreign governmental benefits. We are also subject to the U.S.Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, the CanadianCorruption of Foreign Public Officials Act and other anti-bribery laws that generally bar bribes or unreasonable gifts to foreign governments or officials. Changes in trade sanctions laws could restrict our business practices, including cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries or with sanctioned entities, and may result in modifications to compliance

(53)


programs. Violations of these laws or regulations could result in sanctions including fines, loss of authorizations needed to conduct our international business, the imposition of tariffs or duties and other penalties, which could adversely impact our business, operating results and financial condition.

We are exposed to interest rate fluctuations.

Interest on borrowings under our revolving credit facilities are at “floating” rates. As a result, increases in interest rates will increase our costs of borrowing and reduce our operating margins.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

 

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

We own the Rosenthal, Stendal, Celgar, Peace River pulp mills, the Friesau milland their underlying properties and Celgar mills andhave a 50% joint venture interest in the underlying properties.Cariboo pulp mill. We also own sandalwood plantations in Western Australia.

Rosenthal mill.Mill.The Rosenthal mill is situated on a 230 acre site in the town of BlankensteinRosenthal am Rennsteig in the state of Thüringia, approximately 300 kilometers south of Berlin. The Saale riverRiver flows through the site of the mill. In late 1999, we completed a major capital project which converted the Rosenthal mill to the production of kraft pulp. It is a single line mill with a current annual production capacity of approximately 360,000 ADMTs of kraft pulp. The mill is self-sufficient in steam and electrical power. Some excess electrical power which is constantly generated is sold to the regional power grid. The facilities at the mill include:

 

an approximately 425,000 square feet fiber storage area;

 

debarking and chipping facilities for pulp logs;

 

an approximately 700,000 square feet roundwood yard;

 

a fiber line, which includes a Kamyr continuous digester and bleaching facilities;

 

a pulp machine, which includes a dryer, a cutter and a baling line;

 

an approximately 60,000 square feet finished goods storage area;

 

a chemical recovery line, which includes a recovery boiler, evaporation plant, recausticizing plant and lime kiln;

 

a fresh water plant;

 

a wastewater treatment plant; and

 

a power station with a turbine capable of producing 57 MW of electricelectrical power from steam produced by the recovery boiler and a power boiler.

Stendal Mill.The Stendal mill is situated on a 200 acre site owned by Stendal that is part of a larger 1,250 acre industrial park near the town of Stendal in the state ofSaxony-Anhalt, approximately 300 kilometers north of the Rosenthal mill and 130 kilometers west of Berlin. The mill is adjacent to the Elbe riverRiver and has access to harbor facilities for water transportation. The mill is a single line mill with a current annual design production capacity of approximately 660,000 ADMTs of kraft pulp. The Stendal mill

(54)


is self-sufficient in steam and electrical power. Some excess electrical power which is constantly being generated is sold to the regional power grid. The facilities at the mill include:

 

an approximately 920,000740,000 square feet fiber and roundwood storage area;

 

debarking and chipping facilities for pulp logs;

 

a fiber line, which includes ten SuperBatch™ digesters and bleaching facilities;

 

a pulp machine, which includes a dryer, a cutter and a baling line;

 

an approximately 108,000105,000 square feet finished goods storage area;

a chemical recovery line, which includes a recovery boiler, evaporation plant, recausticizing plant and lime kiln;

 

a fresh water plant;

 

a wastewater treatment plant; and

 

a power station with two turbines capable of producing 148 MW of electrical power.

Celgar Mill. The Celgar mill is situated on a 400 acre site near the city of Castlegar, British Columbia. The mill is located on the south bank of the Columbia River, approximately 600 kilometers east of the port city of Vancouver, British Columbia, and approximately 32 kilometers north of theCanada-U.S. border. The city of Seattle, Washington is approximately 650 kilometers southwest of Castlegar. The Celgar mill is a single line mill with a current annual production capacity of approximately 520,000 ADMTs of kraft pulp. Internal power generating capacity resulting from the completion of the Celgar Energy Project in 2010 enables the Celgar mill to be self-sufficient in electrical power and to sell surplus electricity. The facilities at the Celgar mill include:

 

chipan approximately 25,000 square feet fiber storage facilities with a capacity of 250,000 cubic meters of chips;area;

 

a woodroom containing debarking and chipping equipmentfacilities for pulp logs;

 

a fiber line, which includes a dual vessel hydraulic digester, a two stage oxygen delignification system and a four stage bleach plant;

 

two pulp machines, which each include a dryer, a cutter and a baling line;

 

an approximately 28,000 square feeton-site finished goods storage area and an approximately 29,000 square feetoff-site finished goods storage area;

a chemical recovery line, which includes a recovery boiler, evaporation plant, recausticizing areaplant and lime kiln;

a wastewater treatment system; and

 

a power station with two turbines and generators capable of producing approximately 48100 MW of electrical power.

Peace River Mill. The Peace River mill is situated on a 791 acre site near the town of Peace River, Alberta, approximately 490 kilometers north of Edmonton. The mill has an annual production capacity of approximately 475,000 ADMTs of kraft pulp and 5265 MW respectively, of electric power from steam produced byelectrical generation. The facilities at the Peace River mill include:

an approximately 90,000 square meter paved fiber (wood chip) storage area and approximately 700,000 cubic meter log storage area;

an approximately 90 railcar siding/storage plus an additional 75 railcar siding/storage;

(55)


anon-site water intake and water treatment system for supplying mill water, potable water and fire system water;

a fiber-line which includes a dual vessel hydraulic digester, a single stage oxygen delignification system and a four stage bleach plant;

a single pulp machine which includes a main pulp dryer and a booster pulp dryer, a cutter and two bale lines;

an 11,000 ADMTon-site pulp storage warehouse with railcar loading bays;

a chemical recovery line which includes a recovery boiler, evaporation plant, recausticizing plant and a lime kiln;

a waste water treatment system with an additional linedbio-solids storage basin; and

a power boiler.station with a 25 MW condensing turbine and 45 MW back pressure turbine.

Friesau Mill. The Friesau mill is situated on a 62 acre site in the town of Saalburg-Ebersdorf, Germany, approximately 300 kilometers south of Berlin and only 16 kilometers from the Rosenthal mill. It is a two line sawmill with an annual production capacity of approximately 550 MMfbm of lumber on a continuously operating basis. The mill also sells electrical power generation to the regional power grid at fixed green power tariffs. The mill is self-sufficient in thermal power. The facilities at the Friesau mill include:

an approximately one million square feet roundwood storage area;

three log debarking and two sorting lines;

two Linck sawing lines;

56 lumber kilns capable of matching sawmill production;

a two line planer mill;

an approximately 663,800 square feet finished goods storage area; and

a biomass fueled cogeneration power plant capable of producing 13 MW of electrical power.

Santanol.Santanolowns and leases approximately 2,500 hectares of existing Indian sandalwood plantations and a processing and extraction plant in Western Australia.

(56)


The Manufacturing Process.Process

The following diagram provides a simplified description of the kraft pulp manufacturing process at our pulp mills:

 

LOGO

In order to transform wood chips into kraft pulp, wood chips undergo a multi-step process involving the following principal stages: chip screening, digesting, pulp washing, screening, bleaching and drying.

In the initial processing stage, wood chips are screened to remove oversized chips and sawdust and are conveyed to a pressurized digester where they are heated and cooked with chemicals. This occurs in a continuous process at the Celgar, Peace River, Cariboo and Rosenthal mills and in a batch process at the Stendal mill. This process softens and eventually dissolves the phenolic material called lignin that binds the fibers to each other in the wood.

Cooked pulp flows out of the digester and is washed and screened to remove most of the residual spent chemicals and partially cooked wood chips. The pulp then undergoes a series of bleaching stages where the brightness of the pulp is gradually increased. Finally, the bleached pulp is sent to the pulp machine where it is dried to achieve a dryness level of approximately 90%. The pulp is then ready to be baled for shipment to customers.

A significant feature of kraft pulping technology is the recovery system, whereby chemicals used in the cooking process are captured and extracted forre-use, which reduces chemical costs and improves

(57)


environmental performance. During the cooking stage, dissolved organic wood materials and used chemicals, collectively known as black liquor, are extracted from the digester. After undergoing an evaporation process, black liquor is burned in a recovery boiler. The chemical compounds of the black

liquor are collected from the recovery boiler and are reconstituted into cooking chemicals used in the digesting stage through additional processing in the recausticizing plant.

The heat produced by the recovery boiler is used to generate high-pressure steam. Additional steam is generated by a power boiler through the combustion of biomass consisting of bark and other wood residuals from sawmills and our woodrooms and residue generated by the effluent treatment system. Additionally, during times of upset, we may use natural gas to generate steam. The high pressure steam produced by the recovery and power boilers is used to power a turbine generator to generate electricity, low pressure steam coming off the turbine is then used to provide heat for the digesting and pulp drying processes.

Our Friesau mill principally manufactures finished sawn lumber milled from spruce and pine, including European metric and specialty lumber, U.S. dimensional lumber andJ-grade lumber, in various sizes and grades. The process for manufacturing lumber results in a significant percentage of each sawlog ending up asby-products or residuals such as wood chips, trim blocks, sawdust shavings and bark, which are typically sold to a wide variety of customers. In addition, we utilize a significant portion of the chips from the Friesau mill at our Rosenthal pulp mill.

Other Properties. In addition, we own a logistics and reload center near Trail, British Columbia and lease offices in Vancouver, British Columbia, Berlin, Arneburg and Hamburg, Germany, Perth, Australia and Seattle, Washington.

The €5.0 million Rosenthal working capital facility is secured by certain land at the Rosenthal mill. The working capital loan facilities established for our three mills are secured by first charges against the inventories and receivables of the respective mills.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In January 2012, we initiated a claim against the Government of Canada for breaches by it of its obligations under NAFTA. Our NAFTA claim relates to our investment in the Celgar mill and arises from the treatment of the Celgar mill’s energy generation assets and operations by the Province of British Columbia, primarily through the actions of B.C. Hydro, a provincially owned and controlled enterprise, and the British Columbia Utilities Commission, a provincial government regulatory agency. Our NAFTA claim is against the Government of Canada, rather than the Province of British Columbia as, under NAFTA, the Canadian government is responsible for the actions of its provinces. Our NAFTA claim alleges that our Celgar mill has received unfair and discriminatory treatment regarding the mill’s ability to purchase and sell energy compared to other pulp mills and entities that generate and sell electricity within the Province of British Columbia. Under our NAFTA claim, we are seeking approximately C$250.0 million in damages consisting of past losses accruing since 2008 and the net present value of projected losses that would result from the ongoing application of discriminatory Provincial policies should the status quo remain unchanged. Our NAFTA claim was heard by a tribunal appointed pursuant thereto in 2015. We currently expect to receive a decision from the tribunal some time in 2016.

As a result of the inherent uncertainty of litigation, there can be no assurance whether we will be successful in such NAFTA claim and we cannot quantify the amount we may recover, if any, under such proceedings if we were successful.

In 2012, as a result of a regular tax field audit for the Stendal mill, German public authorities commenced a preliminary investigation into a past and then current managers of the mill relating to whether certain settlement amounts received by the Stendal mill in 2007, 2010 and 2011 from the main contractor under the contract for the construction of the mill should have reduced the assessment base for the original investment subsidies granted to the mill by German authorities. The payments were made by the contractor to the Stendal mill to settle certain warranty, performance and remediation claims that the mill made against the contractor after completion of mill construction. The amounts under review aggregate approximately €8.3 million ($9.0 million). Investment subsidies received by the Stendal mill were generally based upon a percentage of the assessment base for subsidies of the mill. If the settlement payments received by the Stendal mill result in a reduction of the assessment base for subsidies under applicable German rules there

could be a proportionate reduction in the investment subsidies and the difference could be repayable by the mill. We believe the Stendal mill has properly recorded the settlement amounts received from the contractor and that the same do not reduce the assessment base for subsidies of the mill and do not believe the outcome of the investigation will have a material adverse effect on our business or operations. However, at this time, there can be no certainty as to the outcome of the current investigation.

We are also subject to routine litigation incidental to our business. We do not believe that the outcome of such litigation will have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.

 

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

(58)


PART II

 

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

(a)        Market Information.Our shares are quoted for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “MERC” and listed in U.S. dollars on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol “MRI.U”. The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices of our shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for each quarter in thetwo-year period ended December 31, 2015:2018:

 

Fiscal Quarter Ended

        High               Low             High             Low     

2015

    

2018

      

March 31

  $    15.50    $    11.87     $14.90      $12.05  

June 30

  $15.95    $13.00     $17.75      $12.20  

September 30

  $14.21    $8.28     $18.75      $15.45  

December 31

  $11.68    $8.80     $19.14      $9.36  

2014

    

2017

      

March 31

  $9.95    $7.05     $12.98      $10.35  

June 30

  $10.54    $7.08     $12.70      $10.95  

September 30

  $11.41    $9.06     $12.45      $10.45  

December 31

  $14.08    $9.25     $15.00      $11.70  

(b)        Shareholder Information.As at February 11, 2016,13, 2019, there were approximately 255200 holders of record of our shares and a total of 64,656,13865,201,661 shares were outstanding.

(c)        Dividend Information.On February 10, 2016,14, 2019, our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $0.115$0.125 per share to be paid to holders of our common stock on April 5, 20163, 2019 to shareholders of record on March 28, 2016.27, 2019.

In 2015,2018, our board of directors approved twofour quarterly dividend payments of $0.115$0.125 per share each, the first of which wasbeing paid on April 4, 2018, the second being paid on July 6, 2018, the third being paid on October 5, 20153, 2018 and the secondfourth being paid on January 5, 2016.December 20, 2018.

The further declaration and payment of dividends is at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors, including our earnings, financial condition, restrictions imposed by our credit facilities and the terms of any other indebtedness that may be outstanding, cash requirements, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. The indentures governing our 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes and our credit facilities limit our ability to pay dividends or make other distributions on capital stock. See Item 1. “Business – Description of Certain Indebtedness”.

(d)        Equity Compensation Plans.The following table sets forth information as at December 31, 20152018 with respect to the shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.

 

  Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

(a)
 Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding
options, warrants and rights
(b)
 Number of securities
remaining available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding
securities reflected in

column (a))
(c)

Plan Category

  

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

 -(1) $- 2,048,9752,819,121(2)

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

 - $            -  -

(59)


 

(1)

Excludes 78,00031,130 outstanding restricted shares which vest in 20162019 and 1,255,919a maximum of 2,036,008 outstanding performance share units, 154,242898,790 of which had vested as at December 31, 2015.2018. The underlying shares of common stock relating to the vested performance share units were issued in January 2016.February 2019. Of the remaining 1,101,6771,137,218 performance share units, 630,189503,344 will vest in 20172019 and 471,488633,874 will vest in 2018.2020. The actual number of shares of common stock issued in respect of unvested performance share units will vary from 0% to 200% of performance share units granted, based upon achievement of performance objectives established for such awards.

(2)

Represents the number of shares of our common stock remaining available for issuance under the 2010 Plan as of December 31, 2015.2018. Our 2010 Plan replaced the 2004 Plan and the 1992 Plan expired in 2008. Our 2010 Plan provides for options, restricted stock rights, restricted shares, performance shares, performance share units and stock appreciation rights to be awarded to employees, consultants andnon-employee directors.

(e)        Performance Graph.The following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return, calculated on an assumed dividend reinvested basis, for our common stock, the NASDAQ Stock Market Index, referred to as the “NASDAQ Index”, and Standard Industrial Classification, or “SIC”, Code Index (SIC Code 2611- pulp mills), referred to as the “Industry Index”. The graph assumes $100 was invested in each of our common stock, the NASDAQ Index and the Industry Index on December 31, 2010.2013. Data points on the graph are annual.

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN

 

LOGO

ASSUMES $100 INVESTED DEC. 31, 2013

ASSUMES DIVIDENDS REINVESTED

FISCAL YEAR ENDING DEC. 31, 2018

 

   

2010

   

2011

   

2012

   

2013

   

2014

   

2015

 

Mercer International Inc.

   100.00     78.71     92.39     128.65     158.58     119.69  

SIC Code Index

   100.00     70.25     80.12     95.69     107.16     68.72  

NASDAQ Stock Market Index

   100.00     99.17     116.48     163.21     187.27     200.31  
   

2013

     

2014

     

2015

     

2016

     

2017

     

2018

 

Mercer International Inc.

  $  100.00     $  123.27     $93.04     $115.55     $161.48     $122.13 

Industry Index

  $100.00     $123.38     $93.04     $115.56     $161.49     $122.15 

NASDAQ Index

  $100.00     $114.75     $  122.74     $  133.62     $  173.22     $  168.30 

(60)


ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected historical financial and operating data as at and for the years indicated. Our consolidated financial statements as at and for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2012 were reported using the euro. Effective October 1, 2013, we changed our reporting currency to the U.S. dollar. With the change in reporting currency, all comparative financial information has been recast from euros to U.S. dollars to reflect our consolidated financial statements as if they had been historically reported in U.S. dollars, consistent with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 830. Certain balance sheet items in 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011 have been reclassified as a result of our early adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2015-03,Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, and Accounting Standards Update 2015-17,Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. See Note 1 of our consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in this annual report.

The following selected financial data isare qualified in itstheir entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in this annual report and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  2015 2014 2013 2012 2011   2018(1) 2017 2016 2015 2014 
  (in thousands, other than per share and per ADMT amounts)   (in thousands, other than per share amounts and operating data) 

Statement of Operations Data

            

Revenues

      

Pulp

  $946,237   $1,073,632   $996,187   $979,770   $1,157,206  

Energy and chemicals

   86,967   101,480   92,198   92,966   94,758  

Pulp segment revenues

  $1,268,204  $  1,071,715  $931,623  $1,033,204  $1,175,112 

Wood products segment revenues

   189,036  97,430    

Corporate and other revenues

   478     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total revenues

  $  1,457,718  $1,169,145  $931,623  $1,033,204  $1,175,112 

Pulp segment operating income

  $274,356  $171,279(2)   $124,594(2)   $171,850(2)   $167,892(2)  

Wood products segment operating income

   6,203  5,610    

Corporate and other operating loss

   (12,692 (8,335 (9,470 (4,923 (4,464
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total operating income

  $267,867  $168,554  $115,124  $166,927  $163,428 

Pulp segment depreciation and amortization

  $87,628  $80,833  $71,476  $67,761  $77,675 

Wood products segment depreciation and amortization

   8,485  4,060    

Corporate and other depreciation and amortization

   616  401  508  572  337 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total depreciation and amortization

  $96,729  $85,294  $71,984  $68,333  $78,012 
  $  1,033,204   $  1,175,112   $  1,088,385   $  1,072,736   $  1,251,964  

Costs and expenses

  $867,520   $1,013,314   $1,056,725   $1,009,714   $1,097,299    $1,189,851  $1,000,591(2)   $816,499(2)   $866,277(2)   $1,011,684(2)  

Operating income

  $165,684   $161,798   $31,660   $63,022   $154,665  

Interest expense

  $(53,891 $(67,516 $(69,156 $(71,767 $(82,114  $51,464  $54,796  $51,575  $53,891  $67,516 

Foreign exchange gain (loss) on intercompany debt

  $(5,306 $(4,777 $904   $-   $1,635  

Gain on settlement of debt

  $-   $3,357   $-   $-   $-  

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments

  $(935 $11,501   $19,709   $4,812   $(1,974

Other income (expense)

  $(601 $(171 $311   $(179 $1,990  

Net income (loss)(1)

  $75,502   $113,154   $(26,375 $(15,670 $69,699  

Net income (loss) per share

      

(Loss) gain on settlement of debt

  $(21,515)(3)  $(10,696)(4)  $(454)(4)  $ -  $3,357 

Legal cost award

  $(6,951 $ -  $ -  $ -  $ - 

Acquisition commitment fee

  $(5,250 $ -  $ -  $ -  $ - 

Other income (expenses)

  $(5,417 $873(2)   $(3,631)(2)  $(8,085)(2)  $4,923(2)  

Net income

  $128,589  $70,483  $34,943  $75,502  $113,154 

Net income per common share

      

Basic

  $1.17   $1.82   $(0.47 $(0.28 $1.39    $1.97  $1.09  $0.54  $1.17  $1.82 

Diluted

  $1.17   $1.81   $(0.47 $(0.28 $1.24    $1.96  $1.08  $0.54  $1.17  $1.81 

Dividends declared per common share

  $0.23   $-   $-   $-   $-    $0.50  $0.47  $0.46  $0.23  $- 

Weighted average shares outstanding

            

Basic

   64,381   62,013   55,674   55,597   50,117     65,133  64,916  64,631  64,381  62,013 

Diluted

   64,777   62,515   55,674   55,597   56,986     65,771  65,393  65,098  64,777  62,515 

Balance Sheet Data

            

Current assets

  $388,811   $357,867   $465,447   $448,993   $475,393    $810,699  $852,339(5)   $401,851  $388,811  $357,867(6)  

Current liabilities

  $104,421   $115,503   $180,259   $179,876   $163,534    $195,388  $430,466(5)   $93,170  $104,421  $115,503 

Working capital

  $284,390   $242,364   $285,188   $269,117   $311,859    $615,311  $421,873  $308,681  $284,390  $242,364(6)  

Total assets

  $1,182,817   $1,306,229   $1,531,908   $1,546,977   $1,564,693  

Total assets(7)

  $1,975,735  $1,724,710(5)   $  1,158,708  $  1,182,817  $  1,306,229(6)  

Long-term liabilities

  $695,420   $751,846   $1,003,332   $999,339   $1,033,348    $1,198,918  $743,578  $686,410  $695,420  $751,846(6)  

Total equity

  $382,976   $438,880   $348,317   $367,762   $367,811    $581,429  $550,666  $379,128  $382,976  $438,880 

Other Data

      

Pulp sales volume (ADMTs)

   1,463.1   1,486.4   1,440.1   1,473.5   1,427.9  

Pulp production (ADMTs)

   1,458.0   1,485.0   1,444.5   1,468.3   1,453.7  

Average pulp sales realizations (per ADMT)(2)

  $640   $715   $683   $657   $799  

Selected Production, Sales and Other Data

      

Pulp Segment

      

Pulp production (‘000 ADMTs)

      

NBSK

   1,451.3  1,507.0  1,428.4  1,458.0  1,485.0 

NBHK

   21.3     

Pulp sales (‘000 ADMTs)

      

NBSK

   1,418.0  1,515.1  1,428.7  1,463.1  1,486.4 

NBHK

   22.9     

Average pulp sales realizations ($/ADMT)(8)

      

NBSK

   821  640  586  640  715 

NBHK

   707     

Energy production (‘000 MWh)

   1,625.2  1,888.3  1,812.6  1,846.8  1,853.5 

Energy sales (‘000 MWh)

   615.2  822.1  785.8  815.0  807.8 

Average energy sales realizations ($/MWh)

   103  95  91  92  110 

Wood Products Segment

      

Lumber production (MMfbm)

   398.7  281.3    

Lumber sales (MMfbm)

   412.9  213.5    

Average lumber sales realizations ($/Mfbm)

   408  385    

Energy production and sales (‘000 MWh)

   86.3  73.7    

Average energy sales realizations ($/MWh)

   125  120    

(61)


 

(1)

Includes results of MPR since December 10, 2018 and excludes energy sales relating to our 50% joint venture interest in CPP, which is accounted for as an equity investment.

(2)

Adjusted as a result of our adoption of Accounting Standards Update2017-07,Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-Retirement Benefit Cost, in the current year. See Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

(3)

Redemption of $300.0 million of 2022 Senior Notes.

(4)

Redemption of 2019 Senior Notes.

(5)

In December 2017, we issued $300.0 million of 2026 Senior Notes and used the proceeds along with cash on hand to redeem, on January 5, 2018, $300.0 million of 2022 Senior Notes.

(6)

Adjusted as a result of our adoption of Accounting Standards Update2015-17,Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, and Accounting Standards Update2015-03,Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.

(7)

We do not report the effect of government grants relating to our assets in our income. These grants reduce the cost basis of the assets purchased. See Item 1. “Business – Capital Expenditures”.

(2)(8)

Sales realizations after discounts.customer discounts, rebates and other selling concessions. Incorporates the effect of pulp price variations occurring between the order and shipment dates.

(62)


NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

This annual report on Form10-K contains “non-GAAP“non-GAAP financial measures”, that is, financial measures that either exclude or include amounts that are not excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, referred to as “GAAP”. Specifically, we make use of thenon-GAAP measures “Operating EBITDA” and “Operating EBITDA margin”.

Operating EBITDA is defined as operating income (loss) plus depreciation and amortization andnon-recurring capital asset impairment charges. Operating EBITDA margin is Operating EBITDA expressed as a percentage of revenues. We use Operating EBITDA and Operating EBITDA margin as benchmark measurements of our own operating results and as benchmarks relative to our competitors. We consider them to be meaningful supplements to operating income as performance measures primarily because depreciation expense andnon-recurring capital asset impairment charges are not actual cash costs, and depreciation expense varies widely from company to company in a manner that we consider largely independent of the underlying cost efficiency of our operating facilities. In addition, we believe Operating EBITDA is commonly used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate our financial performance.

Operating EBITDA does not reflect the impact of a number of items that affect our net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders,, including financing costs and the effect of derivative instruments. Operating EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from operations as a measure of performance, or as an alternative to net cash from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. Operating EBITDA and Operating EBITDA margin are internal measures and therefore may not be comparable to other companies.

Operating EBITDA has significant limitations as an analytical tool, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are that Operating EBITDA does not reflect: (i) our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; (ii) changes in, or cash requirements for, working capital needs; (iii) the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our outstanding debt; (iv) noncontrolling interests in our Stendal NBSK pulp mill operations prior to our acquisition of 100% of the economic interest of Stendal in September 2014; (v) the impact of realized or marked to market changes in our derivative positions, which can be substantial; and (vi)(v) the impact ofnon-recurring impairment charges against our investments or assets. Because of these limitations, Operating EBITDA should only be considered as a supplemental performance measure and should not be considered as a measure of liquidity or cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business. Because all companies do not calculate Operating EBITDA in the same manner, Operating EBITDA as calculated by us may differ from Operating EBITDA or EBITDA as calculated by other companies. We compensate for these limitations by using Operating EBITDA as a supplemental measure of our performance and by relying primarily on our GAAP financial statements.

(63)


ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of our operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 is based upon and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this annual report. This annual report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those indicated in forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and Item 1A. “Risk Factors”.

Results of Operations

General

We operate inhave two reportable operating segments:

Pulp – consists of the manufacture, sale and distribution of pulp, businesselectricity and otherby-products at our operationspulp mills.

Wood Products – consists of the manufacture, sale and distribution of lumber, electricity and other wood residuals at the Friesau mill.

Each segment offers primarily different products and requires different manufacturing processes, technology and sales and marketing.

Until December 10, 2018, we operated three pulp mills, two of which are located in Germany and one in Western Canada. OurSuch pulp mills have a current combined annual production capacity of approximately 1.5 million ADMTs of NBSK pulp and 305 MW of electrical generation. On December 10, 2018, we acquired MPR which operates the Peace River mill in Alberta and has a 50% joint venture interest in the Cariboo mill in British Columbia. The Peace River mill is a swing mill that produces both NBSK and NBHK. We currently have consolidated annual kraft pulp production capacity of approximately 2.2 million ADMTs, of which approximately 86% is NBSK and the balance is NBHK.

The Friesau mill is located in Germany and has an annual production capacity of 550 million board feet of lumber and 13 MW of electrical generation.

Markets for NBSKkraft pulp are global, cyclical and commodity based. Our financial performance depends on a number of variables that impact sales and production costs. Sales and production results for kraft pulp are influenced largely by the market price for NBSKkraft pulp, fiber costs and foreign currency exchange rates. Kraft pulp prices are highly cyclical and primarily determined by the balance between supply and demand. Pricing and demand are influenced by global macroeconomicmacro-economic conditions, changes in consumption and industry capacity, the level of customer and producer inventories and fluctuations in exchange rates. The average European list prices for NBSK pulp between 20062009 and 20152018 have fluctuated between a low of $575 per ADMT in 2009 to a high of $1,030$1,230 per ADMT in 2011.2018. The average North American list prices for NBHK pulp between 2009 and 2018 have fluctuated between a low of $520 per ADMT in 2009 to a high of $1,235 per ADMT in 2018.

Our financial performance is also impacted by changes in the dollar to euro and Canadian dollar exchange rates. Changes in currency rates affect our operating results because most of our operating costs at our German mills are incurred in euros. Most ofeuros and those at our operating costs at the Celgar millCanadian mills are in Canadian dollars. These costs do not fluctuate with the dollar to euro or Canadian dollar exchange rates. Thus, an increase in the strength

(64)


of the dollar versus the euro and the Canadian dollar decreases our operating costs and increases our operating margins and income from operations. Conversely, a weakening of the dollar against the euro and the Canadian dollar tends to increase our operating costs and decrease our operating margins and income from operations. Our energy, chemical and chemicalEuropean lumber sales are made in local currencies and, as a result, decline in dollar terms when the dollar strengthens and increase when the dollar weakens.

As a corollary to changes in exchange rates between the dollar and the euro and Canadian dollar, a stronger dollar generally increases costs to our customers and results in downward pressure on pulp and lumber prices. Conversely, a weakening dollar generally supports higher pulp and lumber pricing. However, there is invariably a time lag between changes in currency exchange rates and pulp prices. This lag can vary and is not predictable with any precision.

In 2015, changes in foreign exchange rates had a very significant effect on revenues,2018, the dollar was 5% weaker against the euro compared to 2017, which increased our euro denominated costs and expenses and results of operations, asexpenses. In 2018, the U.S. dollar increased by approximately 16% and 14%, respectively, versus the euro andwas flat against the Canadian dollar compared to 2014. This largely contributed to an approximately 14% reduction in our costs and expenses in 2015 compared to 2014.

2017. In 2014,2017, the U.S. dollar was flat and 7% stronger2% weaker against the euro and Canadian dollar respectively, compared to 2013. This contributed to a 4% decrease in costs and expenses in 2014 compared to 2013.

In 2013, demand for NBSK pulp from China was stable throughout the year and supply was slightly under-balanced,2016, which resulted in higher prices than the prior year. In 2014, generally strong markets resulted in average NBSK list prices being about 7% higher than the previous year. At the end of 2014, list prices were approximately $935 per ADMT in Europe and $1,020 per ADMT and $700 per ADMT in North America and China, respectively. In 2015, although pulp markets and demand were generally stable, the appreciation and the strength of the U.S. dollar versus theincreased our euro and Canadian dollar resulted indenominated costs and expenses. In 2016, a generally overall strong dollar benefited our costs and expenses.

In 2018, average list prices declining by about 8% compared to 2014. At the end of 2015, thefor NBSK list price waspulp increasedby approximately $940 per ADMT in North America and $800 and $595 per ADMT31% in Europe and 23% in China respectively.compared to 2017 as a result of steady demand. In 2017, list prices for NBSK pulp increased by approximately 15% compared to 2016.

Our pulp sales realizations are list prices, net of customer discounts, rebates and other selling commissions.concessions. Over the last three years, these discounts, rebates and commissions,concessions, particularly in Europe and North America, have increased as producers compete for customers and sales. Our sales to China are closer to a net price with significantly lower or little discounts and rebates.

SurplusThe European and U.S. lumber markets are very different. In the European market, lumber is generally customized in terms of dimensions and finishing, whereas the U.S. market is driven primarily by demand from new housing starts and dimensions and finishing are generally standardized.

In the first half of 2018, European and U.S. lumber markets were strong with prices near multi-year highs. In the third quarter of 2018, European and U.S. lumber markets weakened with prices declining. European lumber pricing declined due to an increase in beetle and storm damaged wood entering the market at lower prices. U.S. lumber pricing declined as a response to record pricing earlier in 2018 which resulted in increased supply and high customer inventory levels combined with a slower summer housing market. This pricing stabilized at the end of 2018. In 2017, European and U.S. lumber markets were strong with prices near multi-year highs.

Production and sales of energy and chemicals are key revenue sources for us. In 2018, 2017 and 2016, we generated and sold 701,507 MWh, 895,818 MWh and 785,845 MWh, respectively, of renewable energy. Furtherinitiatives to increase our generation and sales of renewable energy, chemicals and otherby-products will continue to be a key focus for us. Such further initiatives may require additional capital spending.

Energy and chemicals areby-products of our pulp productionand lumberproduction and the volumes generated and sold are primarily related to the rate of pulp production. Prices for our energy and chemical sales are generally stable and unrelated to cyclical changes in pulp prices. However,or lumberprices. In 2018, our energy and chemicals are sold inchemical revenues decreased by approximately 12% compared to 2017 primarily due to the local currencies ofmaintenance work on our millsStendal and as a result, in 2015,Celgar turbines. In 2017, our energy and chemical revenues increased by approximately 20%compared to 2016 due to the strengtheningacquisition of the dollar versus the euroFriesau mill and Canadian dollar largely contributed to a decline in revenues compared to 2014.higher production at our pulp mills.

Production and sales of surplus energy and chemicals are key revenue sources for us. In 2015, 2014 and 2013, our mills generated and sold 814,966 MWh, 807,758 MWh and 699,051 MWh, respectively, of surplus renewable energy. Initiatives to increase our generation and sales of surplus renewable energy, chemicals and other by-products will continue to be a key focus for us. Such further initiatives may require additional capital spending.

(65)


Our production costs are influenced by the availability and cost of raw materials, energy and labor, and our plant efficiencies and productivity. Our main raw material is fiber in the form of wood chips, pulp logs and pulp logs.sawlogs. Wood chip, and pulp log and sawlog costs are primarily affected by the supply of, and demand for, lumber and pulp, which are both highly cyclical. Over the last three years, the demand and competition for fiber has also been impacted by renewable energy producers in Germany, particularly by wood pellet producers. Higher fiber costs could affect producer profit margins if they are unable to pass along price increases to pulp and lumber customers or purchasers of surplus energy.

In 2013, improving lumber markets increased the supply of chips and demand for saw logs and higher quality pulp logs, which put upward pressure on log pricing. Additionally, higher energy prices and a focus on “green” or renewable energy, while benefiting our surplus power sales, led to an overall increase in demand for wood residuals in Germany from other renewable energy producers such as pellet producers. This increased demand and competition for fiber put upward pressure on fiber prices. A recovery in U.S. housing starts which commenced in the latter part of 2012 and continued through 2015 resulted in increased sawmill activity in North America. This increased the supply of wood chips for the Celgar mill and reduced its need for pulp logs, which are generally a higher cost for the mill than wood chips. In 2015,2018, our per unit fiber costs were 14% lower than 2014increased by approximately 18% for our pulp segment and 7% for our wood products segment primarily as a result of lower availability of pulp logs and demand from coastal pulp mills in Celgar’s fiber basket and increased demand from competitors in our European fiber procurement areas. In 2018, harvesting activities in both British Columbia and Germany were negatively impacted by short-term interruptions resulting from unseasonably wet winter conditions. Additionally, in British Columbia, there was lower pulp log availability as sawmills focused harvesting activities on rebuilding low sawlog inventories. In 2017, our per unit fiber costs in our pulp segment were flat compared to 2016, primarily as a result of a balanced wood market in both Germany and the strength of the U.S. dollar versus the euro and Canadian dollar. Wood chip supply in Germany was generally stable during 2015.Celgar mill’s fiber basket.

Production costs also depend on the total volume of production. High operating rates and production efficiencies permit us to lower our average per ADMTunit cost by spreading fixed costs over more units. Higher operating rates also permit us to increase our generation and sales of surplus renewable energy and chemicals. Our production levels are also dependent on, among other things, the number of days of maintenance downtime at our mills.

The following table sets out the number of days (ADMTs in thousands) of annual maintenance(and ADMTs) ofannualmaintenance downtime at each offor our millspulp segment for the periods indicated:

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 
   Days   ADMTs   Days   ADMTs   Days   ADMTs 
   (in thousands, except numbers of days) 

Rosenthal

   11     11.1     10     10.1     10     9.4  

Stendal

   15     28.1     4     7.5     12     22.4  

Celgar

   14     19.2     10     14.0     11     16.0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

       40         58.4         24         31.6         33         47.8  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Year Ended December 31, 
   2018(1)   2017   2016 
       Days       ADMTs       Days       ADMTs       Days       ADMTs 
   (in thousands, except numbers of days) 

Pulp segment

   54    75.6    35    48.0    43    61.4 

Going forward in 2016,

(1)

Excluding MPR, which was acquired on December 10, 2018.

In 2019, excluding the Peace River mill, we currently have scheduled maintenance downtime for our pulp mills of 3947 days, or approximately 56,40074,300 ADMTs. Of such downtime, an aggregate of two days, or approximately 3,700 ADMTs, will be in the second quarter, an aggregate of ten days, or approximately 12,300 ADMTs, in the third quarter and an aggregate of 35 days, or 58,300 ADMTs, in the fourth quarter.

In 2019, we intend to undertake the replacement of the lower furnace of the boiler at the Peace River mill as a result of a boiler incident that occurred in 2017. Such work is planned to commence in the later part of August 2019, take approximately 58 days, or approximately 95,000 ADMTs, and insurance is expected to cover the estimated costs of about $50.0 million. Upon completion, the mill will have a newstate-of-the-art boiler. We also expect to receive business interruption insurance for the extra downtime for repairs resulting from the prior incident. Such business interruption insurance proceeds will be recorded as a reduction to our cost and expenses.

Unexpected maintenance downtime which has not materially affected us during any of the periods described in this discussion, can be particularly disruptive in our industry.

Our product mix is also important because premium grades of NBSK pulp generally achieve higher prices and profit margins.

We also periodically enter into interest rate, foreign currency, pulp price and energy price derivative contracts to partially protect against the effect of such changes. Gains or losses on such derivatives are included in our earnings, either as they are settled or as they are marked to market for each reporting period. See Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk”.

Selected 20152018 Highlights

In 2015:2018, we:

 

we achieved strong operating performancerecord net income of $128.6 million and the strength of the dollar helped us generate $234.0 million in Operating EBITDA* and $75.5of $364.6 million in net income;driven by higher pulp sales realizations;

 

(66)


we continued to strengthensignificantly expanded our balance sheet and increased our cash position to $99.6 million from $53.2 million and our working capital to $284.4 million from $242.4 million, respectively, from the start of the year;

we reduced our debt by $35.6 million;

mid-waypulp operations through the year, our board instituted a quarterly cash dividendacquisition of $0.115 per share and we returned approximately $14.8 million to our shareholders;

we initiated a broad company-wide program to enhance safety performance at all of our operations;MPR; and

 

wecompleted significant capital investments which were successful infocused on increasing our appeal beforeefficiency, productivity and lowering the B.C. Utilities Commission and recovered $6.1 million and completed our NAFTA hearing and are awaiting a decision currently expected some time in 2016.risk of unplanned downtime.

*See page 64 of this annual report on Form 10-K“– Summary Financial Highlights” for a reconciliation of net income to Operating EBITDA.

Current Market Environment

Demand fromIn 2018, continuing steady demand led to higher pulp prices and sales realizations compared to 2017. In 2018, our NBSK pulp sales realizations increased by 28% compared to 2017. At December 31, 2018, NBSK list prices in Europe, China and Europe was stable throughout 2015North America were approximately $1,185, $725 and supply was generally balanced. However, due to$1,430 per ADMT, respectively, and NBHK prices in China and North America were $710 and $1,230 per ADMT, respectively. As at December 31, 2018, the strengthening dollar, prices decreased in 2015 compared to 2014.

At year end, world kraft pulp producer inventories were about 41 days’ supply for NBSK and about 47 days’ supply for NBHK. At the start of NBSK pulp were at about 29 days’ supply. In addition,2019, we are starting to see increased demand in China which we expect will lower inventory levels.

We believe the new pulp production capacity that came online did not materially adversely impact the market in 2018 as a result of steady demand growth and expected supply limitations. Further, we are not expecting any material new pulp capacity to see continued growthcome online in NBSKthe near term. As a result, we currently expect overall steady pulp demand in emerging markets, particularly in China, driven by increasingthe near term.

Currently the European lumber market is strong demand from tissue producers.

As our operating costs are primarily incurred in euros and Canadian dollars and our principal product, NBSK pulp, is quoted in dollars, our business and operating margins have benefited from the current strengthening of the dollar. Going forward, while weprices continue to benefit frombe near multi-year highs and are expected to remain steady in the near term. The U.S. lumber market is weak as a stronger dollar, the strengthening of the dollar increases costsresponse to our Europeanrecord pricing earlier in 2018 which resulted in increased supply and Asian customers and generally puts downward pressure on pulp prices.high customer inventory levels combined with a slower summer housing market.

Summary Financial Highlights

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015  2014  2013 
   (in thousands, other than percent and per share
amounts)
 

Pulp revenues

  $    946,237   $    1,073,632   $        996,187  

Energy and chemical revenues

  $86,967   $101,480   $92,198  

Operating income

  $165,684   $161,798   $31,660  

Operating EBITDA(1)

  $234,017   $239,810   $110,305  

Operating EBITDA margin(1)

   23%    20%    10%  

Foreign exchange gain (loss) on intercompany debt

  $(5,306 $(4,777 $904  

Gain on settlement of debt

  $-   $3,357   $-  

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments

  $(935 $11,501   $19,709  

Income tax benefit (provision)

  $(29,449 $16,774   $(9,196

Net income (loss)

  $75,502   $113,154   $(26,375

Net income (loss) per share

    

Basic

  $1.17   $1.82   $(0.47)  

Diluted

  $1.17   $1.81   $(0.47)  

Common shares outstanding at period end

   64,502    64,274    55,854  
  Year Ended December 31, 
          2018(1)                  2017                  2016         
  (in thousands, other than percent and per share amounts) 

Statement of Operations Data

   

Pulp segment revenues

 $      1,268,204  $      1,071,715  $      931,623 

Wood products segment revenues

  189,036   97,430  

Corporate and other revenues

  478   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

 $1,457,718  $1,169,145  $931,623 

Pulp segment operating income

 $274,356  $171,279(2)   $124,594(2)  

Wood products segment operating income

  6,203   5,610  

Corporate and other operating loss

  (12,692  (8,335  (9,470
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating income

 $267,867  $168,554  $115,124 

Pulp segment depreciation and amortization

 $87,628  $80,833  $71,476 

Wood products segment depreciation and amortization

  8,485   4,060  

Corporate and other depreciation and amortization

  616   401   508 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total depreciation and amortization

 $96,729  $85,294  $71,984 

Operating EBITDA(3)

 $364,596  $253,848(2)   $187,108(2)  

Operating EBITDA margin(3)

  25%   22%   20% 

Loss on settlement of debt

 $(21,515)(4)  $(10,696)(5)  $(454)(5) 

Provision for income taxes

 $(48,681 $(33,452 $(24,521

Net income

 $128,589  $70,483  $34,943 

Net income per common share

   

Basic

 $1.97  $1.09  $0.54 

Diluted

 $1.96  $1.08  $0.54 

Common shares outstanding at period end

  65,202   65,017   64,694 

 

(1)

Includes results of MPR since December 10, 2018.

(2)

Adjusted as a result of our adoption of Accounting Standards Update2017-07,Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-Retirement Benefit Cost, in the current year. See Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

(67)


(3)

See“Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a description of Operating EBITDA and Operating EBITDA margin, are not measures of financial performance under GAAPtheir limitations and should notwhy we consider them to be considered in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP.useful measures. The following table provides a reconciliation of net income (loss) to operating income and Operating EBITDA for the periodsyears indicated:

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014  2013 
   (in thousands) 

Net income (loss)

  $75,502    $113,154   $(26,375

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

   -     7,812    607  

Income tax (benefit) provision

   29,449     (16,774  9,196  

Interest expense

   53,891     67,516    69,156  

Foreign exchange loss (gain) on intercompany debt

   5,306     4,777    (904

Gain on settlement of debt

   -     (3,357  -  

(Gain) loss on derivative instruments

   935     (11,501  (19,709

Other expense (income)

   601     171    (311
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

   165,684     161,798    31,660  

Add: Depreciation and amortization

   68,333     78,012    78,645  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating EBITDA

  $        234,017    $        239,810   $        110,305  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Year Ended December 31, 
   2018     2017   2016 
   (in thousands) 

Net income

  $128,589     $70,483   $34,943 

Provision for income taxes

   48,681      33,452    24,521 

Interest expense

   51,464      54,796    51,575 

Loss on settlement of debt

   21,515      10,696    454 

Legal cost award

   6,951      -    - 

Acquisition commitment fee

   5,250      -    - 

Other expenses (income)

   5,417      (873   3,631 
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

   267,867      168,554    115,124 

Add: Depreciation and amortization

   96,729      85,294    71,984 
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating EBITDA

  $    364,596     $    253,848   $    187,108 
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

(4)

Redemption of $300.0 million of 2022 Senior Notes.

(5)

Redemption of 2019 Senior Notes.

Selected Production, Sales and Other Data

Selected production, sales and exchange rate data for the periods indicated:

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 

Pulp production (‘000 ADMTs)

           1,458.0             1,485.0             1,444.5  

Annual maintenance downtime (‘000 ADMTs)

   58.4     31.6     47.8  

Annual maintenance downtime (days)

   40     24     33  

Pulp sales (‘000 ADMTs)

   1,463.1     1,486.4     1,440.1  

Average NBSK pulp list prices in Europe ($/ADMT)(1)

   850     928     864  

Average NBSK pulp list prices in North America ($/ADMT)(1)

   972     1,025     941  

Average NBSK pulp list prices in China ($/ADMT)(1)

   643     733     700  

Average pulp sales realizations ($/ADMT)(2)

   640     715     683  

Energy production (‘000 MWh)

   1,846.8     1,853.5     1,710.2  

Energy sales (‘000 MWh)

   815.0     807.8     699.1  

Average energy sales realizations ($/MWh)

   92     110     114  

Average Spot Currency Exchange Rates

      

$ / €(3)

   1.1096     1.3297     1.3281  

$ / C$(3)

   0.7830     0.9060     0.9712  

   Year Ended December 31, 
       2018(1)           2017             2016     

Pulp Segment

        

Pulp production (‘000 ADMTs)

        

NBSK

   1,451.3    1,507.0      1,428.4 

NBHK

   21.3       

Annual maintenance downtime (‘000 ADMTs)

   75.6    48.0      61.4 

Annual maintenance downtime (days)

   54    35      43 

Pulp sales (‘000 ADMTs)

        

NBSK

   1,418.0    1,515.1      1,428.7 

NBHK

   22.9       

Average NBSK pulp list prices in Europe ($/ADMT)(2)

   1,183    901      803 

Average NBSK pulp list prices in China ($/ADMT)(2)

   878    712      599 

Average NBSK pulp list prices in North America ($/ADMT)(2)

   1,337    1,105      978 

Average pulp sales realizations ($/ADMT)(3)

        

NBSK

   821    640      586 

NBHK

   707       

Energy production (‘000 MWh)

   1,625.2(4)     1,888.3      1,812.6 

Energy sales (‘000 MWh)

   615.2(4)     822.1      785.8 

Average energy sales realizations ($/MWh)

   103    95      91 

Wood Products Segment

        

Lumber production (MMfbm)

   398.7    281.3     

Lumber sales (MMfbm)

   412.9    213.5     

Average lumber sales realizations ($/Mfbm)

   408    385     

Energy production and sales (‘000 MWh)

   86.3    73.7     

Average energy sales realizations ($/MWh)

   125    120     

Average Spot Currency Exchange Rates

        

$ / €(5)

   1.1817    1.1301      1.1072 

$ / C$(5)

   0.7722    0.7710      0.7558 

 

(1)

Includes results of MPR since December 10, 2018.

(2)

Source: RISI pricing report.

(2)(3)

Sales realizations after discounts.customer discounts, rebates and other selling concessions. Incorporates the effect of pulp price variations occurring between the order and shipment dates.

(3)(4)

Excludes energy production and sales relating to our 50% joint venture interest in CPP, which is accounted for as an equity investment.

(5)

Average Federal Reserve Bank of New York Noon Buying Rates over the reporting period.

(68)


Year Ended December 31, 20152018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20142017

Consolidated - Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017

Total revenues in 2015 decreased2018 increased by approximately 12%25% to $1,033.2$1,457.7 million from $1,175.1$1,169.1 million in 2014.2017 primarily due to higher pulp sales realizations and the inclusion of wood products segment revenues for the full year partially offset by lower pulp sales volumes.

Costs and expenses in 2018 increased by approximately 19% to $1,189.9 million from $1,000.6 million in 2017 primarily due to higher per unit fiber costs, higher maintenance costs and the inclusion of our wood products segment results for the full year.

In 2018, cost of sales depreciation and amortization increased to $96.3 million from $84.9 million in 2017 due to the completion of large capital projects at our mills, the inclusion of depreciation for our wood products segment for the full year and the negative impact of a weaker dollar on our euro denominated depreciation expense.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $61.5 million in 2018 from $49.7 million in 2017 primarily due to increased business development activities, the inclusion of our wood products segment for the full year and the negative impact of a weaker dollar on our euro denominated expenses.

In 2018, our operating income increased by approximately 59% to $267.9 million from $168.6 million in 2017 as higher NBSK pulp sales realizations more than offset higher per unit fiber costs, higher maintenance costs and lower energy and pulp sales volumes.

In 2018, we redeemed $300.0 million of 2022 Senior Notes at a cost, including premium, of $317.4 million and recorded a loss on such redemption of $21.5 million (being $0.33 per share). In 2017, we redeemed $227.0 million of our 7.0% 2019 Senior Notes at a cost, including premium, of $234.9 million and recorded a loss on such redemption of $10.7 million (being $0.16 per share).

Interest expense in 2018 decreased to $51.5 million from $54.8 million in 2017 primarily as a result of a lower overall average interest rate during the year on our outstanding indebtedness.

In 2018, we incurred expenses of $7.0 million in connection with the legal cost award and $5.3 million in an acquisition commitment fee related to our acquisition of MPR.

In 2018, we incurred other expenses of $5.4 million primarily due to a foreign exchange loss on the strengthening of the dollar on our Canadian dollar denominated cash held to purchase MPR.

During 2018, income tax expense increased to $48.7 million from $33.5 million in 2017 primarily due to higher taxable income for our German mills. In 2018, record net income resulted in our loss carryforwards and other deductions being reduced, resulting in current income taxes of $32.1 million.

In 2018, after giving effect to costs of $33.7 million, or $0.52 per basic and $0.51 per diluted share, for the loss on the redemption of senior notes, the legal cost award and the acquisition commitment fee, our net income increased to $128.6 million, or $1.97 per basic and $1.96 per diluted share, from $70.5 million, or $1.09 per basic and $1.08 per diluted share, after giving effect to costs of $10.7 million for the loss on the redemption of senior notes in 2017.

In 2018, Operating EBITDA increased by approximately 44% to $364.6 million from $253.8 million in 2017 as higher NBSK pulp sales realizations more than offset higher per unit fiber costs, higher maintenance costs and lower energy and pulp sales volumes.

(69)


Pulp Segment – Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017

Selected Financial Information

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2018(1)     2017 
   (in thousands) 

Pulp revenues

  $            1,190,588     $            979,645 

Energy and chemical revenues

  $77,616     $92,070 

Depreciation and amortization

  $87,628     $80,833 

Operating income

  $274,356     $171,279 

(1)

Results of MPR included from December 10, 2018.

Pulp revenues in 2015 decreased2018 increased by approximately 12%22% to $946.2$1,190.6 million from $1,073.6$979.6 million in 2014,2017 due to lower pulphigher sales realizations and the inclusion of $29.8 million of revenues from the MPR acquisition partially offset by lower sales volumes.

Energy and chemical revenues decreased by approximately 14%16% to $87.0$77.6 million in 20152018 from $101.5$92.1 million in 2014,2017 primarily due to scheduled maintenance work on one turbine at each of our Stendal and Celgar mills and lower pulp production. The turbine at the impact ofStendal mill was taken offline for a stronger U.S. dollar relativescheduled maintenance in April 2018 and did not resume service until July 2018. The turbine at the Celgar mill was taken offline to complete maintenance work identified during the eurosecond quarter shut and Canadian dollar, partially offset by higher sales volumes.did not resume service until late August 2018.

PulpNBSK pulp production marginally decreased by approximately 2%4% to 1,457,9731,451,327 ADMTs in 20152018 from 1,485,0111,507,019 ADMTs, being an annual production record, in 2014. We2017. In 2018, with the acquisition of MPR, we also produced 21,263 ADMTs of NBHK pulp. In 2018, we had an aggregateannual scheduled maintenance downtime of 4054 days (approximately 58,40075,600 ADMTs) of annual, compared to 35 days (approximately 48,000 ADMTs) in 2017.

We estimate that such maintenance downtime atin 2018 adversely impacted our mills in 2015, including $26.4operating income by approximately $72.9 million, comprised of approximately $45.3 million in directout-of-pocket expenses compared to 24 days (approximately 31,600 ADMTs)and the balance in 2014, including $19.3 million in direct out-of-pocket expenses.reduced production. Many of our competitors that report their financial results using International Financial Reporting Standards, referred to as “IFRS”, capitalize their direct costs of maintenance downtime. In 2016, we currently estimate taking an aggregate of 39 days of maintenance downtime at our mills.

PulpNBSK pulp sales volumes marginally decreased by approximately 2%6% to 1,463,1321,417,961ADMTs in 2018 compared to 1,515,084 ADMTs in 2015 from 1,486,356 ADMTs in 2014,2017 primarily due to lower production resultingproduction. In 2018, we also sold 22,907 ADMTs of NBHK pulp.

In 2018, list prices for NBSK pulp increased from higher annual maintenance downtime days in 2015.

2017, largely as a result of continued steady demand. Average list prices for NBSK pulp in Europe were approximately $850$1,183 per ADMT in 2015,2018, compared to approximately $928$901 per ADMT in 2014.2017. Average list prices for NBSK pulp in China and North America and China were approximately $972$878 per ADMT and $643$1,337 per ADMT, respectively, in 2015,2018 compared to approximately $1,025$712 per ADMT and $733$1,105 per ADMT, respectively, in 2014.2017.

Average NBSK pulp sales realizations decreasedincreased by approximately 10%28% to $821 per ADMT in 2018 from approximately $640 per ADMT in 2015 from approximately $715 per ADMT last year, primarily2017 due to lowerhigher list prices resulting from the strength of the U.S. dollar.

prices. In 2018, NBHK pulp sales realizations were $707 per ADMT.

In 2015, the dollar was 16% and 14% stronger against the euro and Canadian dollar, respectively, compared to 2014.

Costs and expenses in 2015 decreased by approximately 14% to $867.5 million from $1,013.3 million in 2014, primarily due to the overall impact on costs of the stronger dollar, partially offset by higher annual maintenance downtime costs.

In 2015, operating depreciation and amortization decreased by approximately 13% to $67.8 million from $77.7 million in 2014, due to the impact of a stronger dollar relative to the euro and Canadian dollar.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased marginally to $46.2 million from $47.9 million in 2014, due to the stronger U.S. dollar.

Transportation costs decreased to $74.4 million in 2015 from $88.6 million in 2014, primarily due to the impact of a stronger U.S. dollar.

On average, our overall per unit fiber costs in 2015 decreased by approximately 14% from 2014, primarily asAs a result of the effect of a strongstronger dollar versusat the end of 2018, we recorded a positive impact on our dollar denominated cash and receivables held at our operations, which was mostly offset by the negative impact of an overall 5% weaker dollar against the euro, which increased the dollar cost of our euro denominated costs and expenses compared to 2017. In 2018, the Canadian dollarnet positive impact on local currencyoperating income due to foreign exchange was $3.9 million.

(70)


Costs and expenses in 2018 increased by approximately 10% to $995.2 million from $901.8 million in 2017 primarily due to higher per unit fiber prices. costs, higher maintenance costs and costs and expenses from our acquisition of MPR partially offset by lower sales volumes.

In 2015,2018, depreciation and amortization increased to $87.6 million from $80.8 million in local currency terms,2017 primarily due to the negative impact of a weaker dollar on our euro denominated depreciation expense, capital improvements at the Celgar mill and the depreciation expense for the acquisition of MPR.

On average, in 2018, overall per unit fiber prices in Germany were marginally lower than in 2014,costs increased by approximately 18% from 2017 primarily as a result of increased demand from competitors in our European fiber procurement areas and lower availability of pulp logs and demand from coastal pulp mills in Celgar’s fiber basket. Harvesting activities in both Germany and British Columbia were impacted by short-term interruptions resulting from unseasonably wet winter conditions. Additionally, in British Columbia, there was lower pulp log availability as sawmills focused harvesting activities on rebuilding low sawlog inventories. In 2019, we currently expect modestly lowerper unit fiber costs as a result of improved harvesting conditions and the availability of storm damaged wood in Germany.

Transportation costs increased by approximately 5% to $80.4 million in 2018 from $76.4 million in 2017 primarily due to our acquisition of MPR.

In 2018, pulp segment operating income increased by approximately 60% to $274.4 million from $171.3 million in 2017 primarily due to higher pulp sales realizations partially offset by higher per unit fiber costs, higher maintenance costs and lower sales volumes.

Wood Products Segment – Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2017

Selected Financial Information

   Year Ended December 31, 
       2018             2017(1)     
   (in thousands) 

Lumber revenues

  $            168,663     $            82,176 

Energy revenues

  $10,831     $8,872 

Wood residual revenues

  $9,542     $6,382 

Depreciation and amortization

  $8,485     $4,060 

Operating income

  $6,203     $5,610 

(1)

We acquired the Friesau mill in April 2017.

In 2018, lumber revenues were $168.7 million, of which approximately 25% of sales volumes were in the U.S. market and substantially all remaining sales were in Europe, compared to $82.2 million in 2017, the majority of which was in the European market. European lumber markets were generally balancedstrong with prices near multi-year highs and U.S. lumber markets were strong with a weakening near the end of 2018.

In 2018, lumber production increased to 398.7 MMfbm from 281.3 MMfbm in 2017 primarily as a result of the inclusion of our wood market.products segment results for the full year. In 2018, lumber sales volumes increased to 412.9 MMfbm in 2018 from 213.5 MMfbm in 2017.

In 2018, average lumber sales realizations increased by approximately 6% to $408 per Mfbm from $385 per Mfbm in 2017.

In 2018, energy and otherby-product revenues increased to $20.4 million from $15.3 million in 2017 primarily as a result of the inclusion of our wood products segment results for the full year. In 2018, we sold 86,325 MWh of electricity compared to 73,698 MWh of electricity in 2017.

(71)


Our fiber costs were approximately 80% of our cash production costs in 2018. Unseasonably wet winter weather conditions in Germany early in 2018 resulted in lower harvesting activities and high fiber costs in 2018 compared to 2017. We currently expect modestly lower per unit fiber costs in 2019 as a result of improved harvesting conditions and the availability of beetle and storm damaged wood.

In 2018, depreciation and amortization for our wood products segment increased to $8.5 million from $4.1 million in 2017 as a result of the inclusion of a full year in 2018 and capital projects.

In 2018, our wood products segment operating income increased to $6.2 million from $5.6 million in 2017.

Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016

Consolidated – Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016

Total revenues in 2017 increased by approximately 25% to $1,169.1 million from $931.6 million in 2016 primarily due to higher pulp revenues and the inclusion of $97.4 million of revenues from our wood products segment.

Costs and expenses in 2017 increased by approximately 23% to $1,000.6 million from $816.5 million in 2016 primarily due to the inclusion of our wood products segment and higher pulp sales volumes.

In 2017, cost of sales depreciation and amortization increased to $84.9 million from $71.5 million in 2016 due to the completion of large capital projects at our pulp mills and the acquisition of the Friesau mill.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $49.7 million in 2017 from $44.5 million in 2016 primarily due to the inclusion of our wood products segment.

In 2017, our operating income increased by approximately 46% to $168.6 million from $115.1 million in 2016 primarily due to higher pulp sales realizations.

In the first quarter of 2017, we issued an aggregate of $250.0 million of 6.5% 2024 Senior Notes and utilized the proceeds primarily to acquire the Friesau mill and redeem $227.0 million of our 7.0% 2019 Senior Notes at a cost, including premium, of $234.9 million and recorded a loss on such redemption of $10.7 million (being $0.16 per share). In December 2017, we issued $300.0 million of 5.5% 2026 Senior Notes and used the proceeds and cash on hand to redeem, on January 5, 2018, $300.0 million of 2022 Senior Notes.

Interest expense in 2017 increased to $54.8 million from $51.6 million in 2016 primarily as interest accrued on the 2024 and 2026 Senior Notes issued in 2017 and the redeemed 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes during the requisite redemption notice periods and increased borrowings to partially finance the acquisition of the Friesau mill and build up its working capital.

During 2017, income tax expense increased to $33.5 million from $24.5 million in 2016 due to higher taxable income for our German mills.

In 2017, net income increased to $70.5 million, or $1.09 per basic and $1.08 per diluted share, from $34.9 million, or $0.54 per share, in 2016.

(72)


In 2017, Operating EBITDA increased by approximately 36% to $253.8 million from $187.1 million in 2016 primarily as a result of higher pulp sales realizations and, to a lesser degree, the inclusion of our wood products segment.

Pulp Segment – Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016

Selected Financial Information

   Year Ended December 31, 
       2017             2016     
   (in thousands) 

Pulp revenues

  $            979,645     $            847,328 

Energy and chemical revenues

  $92,070     $84,295 

Depreciation and amortization

  $80,833     $71,476 

Operating income

  $171,279     $124,594 

Pulp revenues in 2017 increased by approximately 16% to $979.6 million from $847.3 million in 2016 due to higher sales realizations and sales volumes.

Energy and chemical revenues increased by approximately 9% to $92.1 million in 2017 compared to $84.3 million in 2016 primarily due to higher sales volumes.

Pulp production increased by approximately 6% to 1,507,019 ADMTs, being an annual production record, in 2017 from 1,428,384 ADMTs in 2016. In 2017, we had annual maintenance downtime of 35 days (approximately 48,000 ADMTs), compared to 43 days (approximately 61,400 ADMTs) in 2016.

We estimate that such maintenance downtime in 2017 adversely impacted our operating income by approximately $36.8 million, comprised of approximately $28.1 million in directout-of-pocket expenses and the balance in reduced production. Many of our competitors that report their financial results using IFRS capitalize their direct costs of maintenance downtime.

Pulp sales volumes increased by approximately 6% to 1,515,084 ADMTs in 2017 compared to 1,428,672 ADMTs in 2016 primarily due to continued steady demand from both China and Europe and record production.

In 2017, list prices for NBSK pulp increased from 2016, largely as a result of continued steady demand. Average list prices for NBSK pulp in Europe were approximately $901 per ADMT in 2017, compared to approximately $803 per ADMT in 2016. Average list prices for NBSK pulp in China and North America were approximately $712 per ADMT and $1,105 per ADMT, respectively, in 2017, compared to approximately $599 per ADMT and $978 per ADMT, respectively, in 2016.

Average pulp sales realizations increased by approximately 9% to $640 per ADMT in 2017 from approximately $586 per ADMT in 2016 due to higher list prices.

In 2017, the dollar was 2% weaker against the euro and Canadian dollar terms,compared to 2016 which increased the dollar cost of our euro and Canadian dollar denominated costs and expenses and contributed to a negative foreign exchange impact on operating income of approximately $28.0 million when compared to 2016.

Costs and expenses in 2017 increased by approximately 12% to $901.8 million from $807.0 million in 2016 primarily due to higher sales volumes, the negative impact of a weaker dollar on our euro and Canadian dollar denominated costs and expenses and the reversal in 2016 of accruals for wastewater fees at our German mills of $20.8 million.

(73)


In 2017, depreciation and amortization increased to $80.8 million from $71.5 million in 2016 due to the completion of several major capital projects.

On average, in 2017 overall per unit fiber pricescosts in Germany and for our Celgar mill were approximately 17% higher than in 2014, dueflat compared to the impact of a stronger dollar, as a portion of our Celgar mill’s fiber is sourced in dollars and due to increased demand for chips in our Celgar mill’s procurement area from coastal pulp mills. In 2016 we currently expect our overall per unit fiber costs to be generally flat, largelyprimarily as a result of a balanced wood market in both Germany and in the Celgar mill’s fiber basket and due to the continued strength of the dollar versus the euro and Canadian dollar.basket.

In 2015, our operating income increased to $165.7 million from $161.8 million in 2014, primarily due to the effect of a strong U.S. dollar, partially offset by lower pulp sales realizations and higher annual maintenance downtime costs.

Interest expense in 2015 decreased by approximately 20% to $53.9 million from $67.5 million in 2014, primarily due to lower indebtedness.

The noncontrolling shareholder’s interest in the Stendal mill’s net income, which was eliminated in the third quarter of 2014, was $7.8 million in 2014.

In 2015, we recorded a derivative loss of $0.9 million on the mark to market adjustment of the Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract, compared to a non-cash derivative gain of $11.5 million in 2014.

During 2014, we recorded a net gain on the settlement of debt of $3.4 million, which reflected a gain of $31.9 million on our acquisition of all of the shareholder loans of the former noncontrolling shareholder in Stendal, in large part offset by a loss of $28.5 million on the settlement of debt resulting from the refinancing of our long-term debt.

During 2015, as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus the euro, we recorded a non-cash loss on the foreign exchange translation of inter-company debt between Mercer Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries of $5.3 million, compared to $4.8 million in 2014.

During 2015, we recorded an income tax expense of $29.4 million, compared to a net income tax benefit of $16.8 million in 2014, due to the recognition of income tax loss carry-forwards. The effective tax rate for 2015 was 28%. In 2014, the effective tax rate was a recovery as a result of the recognition of deferred German tax assets primarily consisting of tax loss carryforwards.

We had net income of $75.5 million, or $1.17 per basic and diluted share, in 2015. In 2014, net income was $113.2 million, or $1.82 per basic and $1.81 per diluted share, which included a net income tax benefit of $16.8 million, a non-cash gain on derivative instruments of $11.5 million and a net gain on the settlement of debt of $3.4 million.

In 2015, Operating EBITDA marginally decreased by 2% to $234.0 million from $239.8 million in 2014, as the decline in pulp sales realizations, lower energy revenues and higher maintenanceTransportation costs more than offset the positive effect from the strength of the dollar. In 2015, our Operating EBITDA margin was 23%, compared to 20% in 2014.

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013

Total revenues in 2014 increased by approximately 8%12% to $1,175.1 million from $1,088.4$76.4 million in 2013,2017 from $68.1 million in 2016 primarily due to higher sales volumes.

In 2017, pulp revenues and higher energy and chemical revenues.

Pulp revenues in 2014segment operating income increased by approximately 8%37% to $1,073.6$171.3 million from $996.2$124.6 million in 2013,2016 primarily due to higher pulp sales realizations and higher sales volumes.

Energy and chemical revenues increased by approximately 10% to $101.5 million in 2014 from $92.2 million in 2013, primarily because of record energy sales volumes, resulting from Project Blue Mill coming online atpartially offset by the negative impact of a weaker dollar and the reversal in 2016 of accruals for wastewater fees.

Wood Products Segment – Year Ended December 31, 2017

Selected Financial Information

Year Ended
    December 31, 2017    
(in thousands)

Lumber revenues

    $82,176    

Energy revenues

    $8,872    

Wood residual revenues

    $6,382    

Depreciation and amortization

    $4,060    

Operating income

    $5,610    

In 2017, we had lumber revenues of $82.2 million, the majority of which was in the European market. European lumber markets were generally strong and prices steady and near multi-year highs.

We produced 281.3 MMfbm of lumber. Lumber sales volumes were 213.5 MMfbm as we completed our Stendalinventorybuild-up to support sales to the U.S. market.

Average lumber sales realizations in 2017 were approximately $385 per Mfbm.

In 2017, energy and otherby-product revenues were approximately $15.3 million and we sold 73,698 MWh of electricity.

Our fiber costs were approximately 80% of our cash production costs. The ramping up of production resulted in our purchasing large volumes of sawlogs in a short period. This resulted in our sawlog costs being marginally higher than our regional competitors.

In 2017 we started realizing on identified fiber synergies between the Friesau mill at the end of 2013.

Pulp production increased by approximately 3% to 1,485,011 ADMTs in 2014 from 1,444,475 ADMTs in 2013. We had an aggregate of 24 days (approximately 31,600 ADMTs) of annual maintenance downtime at our mills in 2014, compared to 33 days in 2013. During 2014, our Celgar mill took ten days of annual maintenance downtime, or approximately 14,000 ADMTs, our Stendal mill took four days of annual maintenance downtime, or approximately 7,500 ADMTs, and our Rosenthal mill took ten dayspulp mill. During 2017, the facility shipped approximately 738,300 cubic meters of annual maintenance downtime, orchips to Rosenthal, and Rosenthal shipped approximately 10,100 ADMTs.

Pulp sales70,100 cubic meters of waste wood to Friesau. Both volumes increased by approximately 3% to 1,486,356 ADMTsare in 2014 from 1,440,147 ADMTs in 2013, primarily due to generally steady demand throughout 2014.

Average list prices for NBSK pulp in Europe were approximately $928 per ADMT in 2014, compared to approximately $864 per ADMT in 2013. Average list prices for NBSK pulp in North Americaline with our forecasts and China were approximately $1,025 per ADMT and $733 per ADMT, respectively, in 2014, compared to approximately $941 per ADMT and $700 per ADMT, respectively, in 2013.

Average pulp sales realizations increased by approximately 5% to $715 per ADMT in 2014 from approximately $683 per ADMT in 2013, primarily due to higher list prices.

Costs and expenses in 2014 decreased by approximately 4% to $1,013.3 million from $1,056.7 million in 2013, primarily duehave begun to lower per unit fiber costs and the overall impact on costsat both mills. As at December 31, 2017, we estimate we have realized approximately $6.9 million of the stronger U.S. dollar.our expected synergy savings.

In 2014, operating2017, depreciation and amortization marginally decreased to $77.7 million from $78.3 million in 2013.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $47.9 million in 2014 from $51.2 million in 2013.

Transportation costs decreased to $88.6 million in 2014 from $90.0 million in 2013.

On average, our overall per unit fiber costs in 2014 decreased by approximately 7% from 2013, primarily as a result of lower average fiber costs in the markets from which our mills source their fiber and the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus the Canadian dollar. Our per unit fiber costs for our Celgar mill decreased during 2014 compared to 2013 due to strong sawmill activity in the region. Our per unit fiber costs at our German mills declined due to sawmills running at high rates, a stronger supply of logs and lower demand from pellet producers and board manufacturers.

In 2014, our operating income increased to $161.8 million from $31.7 million in 2013, primarily due to higher pulp sales realizations, lower per unit fiber costs, the strengthening of the U.S. dollar and record energy sales volumes.

Interest expense in 2014 decreased to $67.5 million from $69.2 million in 2013, primarily due to lower indebtedness.

During 2014, we recorded a net gain on the settlement of debt of $3.4 million, which reflected a gain of $31.9 million on our acquisition of all of the shareholder loans of the former noncontrolling shareholder in Stendal, in large part offset by a loss of $28.5 million on the settlement of debt resulting from the refinancing of our long-term debt.

In 2014, we recorded a non-cash derivative gain of $11.5 million on the mark to market adjustment of the Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract, compared to a net derivative gain of $19.7 million in 2013.

The noncontrolling shareholder’s interest in the Stendal mill’s net income in 2014wood products segment was $7.8 million, compared to $0.6 million in the prior year. We eliminated such noncontrolling interest in the third quarter of 2014.

During 2014, we recorded a net income tax benefit of $16.8 million, compared to a net income tax expense of $9.2 million in 2013, primarily due to the recognition of income tax loss carry-forwards associated with our Stendal mill.

We had net income of $113.2 million, or $1.82 per basic and $1.81 per diluted share, in 2014, which included a non-cash unrealized gain on the Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract of $11.5 million, a net gain of $3.4 million on the settlement of debt and a deferred income tax benefit of $22.0 million. In 2013, the net loss was $26.4 million, or $0.47 per basic and diluted share, which included a net gain of $19.7 million on the Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract and our fixed price pulp swaps and a deferred tax provision of $11.5$4.1 million.

In 2014, Operating EBITDA increased by 117% to $239.8 million from $110.3 million in 2013, primarily as a result of higher pulp prices, lower per unit fiber costs, the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus the euro and Canadian dollar and higher energy sales volumes. In 2014,2017, our Operating EBITDA marginwood products segment operating income was 20%, compared to 10% in 2013.$5.6 million.

(74)


Sensitivities

Our earnings are sensitive to, among other things, fluctuations in:

NBSK Pulp Price. NBSK pulpPulp is a global commodity that is priced in U.S. dollars, whose markets are highly competitive and cyclical in nature. As a result, our earnings are sensitive to NBSK pulp price changes. Based upon our 20152018 sales volume (and(adjusting for MPR operating for a full year and assuming all other factors remained constant), each $10.00 per tonne change in NBSK pulp list prices yields a change in Operating EBITDA of approximately $12.0$17.0 million.

Lumber Price. Lumber pricing is priced in markets which are highly competitive and cyclical in nature. As a result, our earnings are sensitive to lumber price changes. Based upon our 2018 sales volume and assuming all other factors remain constant, each $10.00 per Mfbm change in lumber price yields a change in Operating EBITDA of approximately $4.0 million.

Fiber Price. Our main raw material is fiber in the form of wood chips, pulp logs and sawlogs. Fiber is a commodity and both prices and supply are cyclical. As a result, our operating costs are sensitive to fiber price changes. For our pulp segment, based upon our 2018 fiber costs, adjusting for MPR operating for a full year and assuming all other factors remained constant, each 1% change in per unit fiber price yields a change in annual operating costs of approximately $6.0 million. For our wood products segment, based upon our 2018 fiber costs and assuming all other factors remained constant, each 1% change in per unit fiber price yields a change in annual operating costs of approximately $1.0 million.

Foreign Exchange.Our operating costs are in euros for our German mills and Canadian dollars for our Celgar mill and our principal product, NBSK pulp, is quoted in U.S. dollars.Canadian mills. As a result, our operating costs when translated into U.S. dollars will fluctuate with changes in the value of the U.S dollar relative to the euro and Canadian dollar. Our business and operating margins have materially benefited from the current strengthening of the U.S. dollar. Based on our 20152018 operating costs, adjusting for MPR operating for a full year and assuming all other factors remained constant, each $0.01 change in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the euro and the Canadian dollar yields a total change in annual operating costs of approximately $9.0$16.0 million.

Our European lumber, energy and chemical sales are made in local currencies and, as a result, decline in U.S. dollar terms when the U.S. dollar strengthens. Based on our 20152018 lumber, energy and chemical revenues and energy revenues,assuming all other factors remained constant, each $0.01 change in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the euro and the Canadian dollar yields a total change in chemicallumber, energy and energychemical revenues of approximately $1.0$2.0 million.

The above sensitivity analysis provides only a limitedpoint-in-time view of the pulp price, lumber price, fiber price and foreign exchange rates discussed. The actual impact of the underlying price and rate changes may differ materially from that shown in the sensitivity analysis.

Seasonal Influences.We are exposed to fluctuations in quarterly sales volumes and expenses due to seasonal factors. These factors are common in the NBSK pulp industry.and lumber industries. We generally have weaker pulp demand in Europe during the summer holiday months and in China in the period relating to itsthe lunar new year. We typically have a seasonalbuild-up in raw material inventories in the early winter months as ourthe mills build up their fiber supply for the winter when there is reduced availability.

(75)


Liquidity and Capital Resources

Summary of Cash Flows

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 
   (in thousands) 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $        159,220    $        144,588    $      36,325  

Net cash used in investing activities

   (49,817   (49,105   (44,968

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   (56,664   (175,752   15,233  

Effect of exchange rate on changes in cash and cash equivalents

   (6,282   (14,287   3,699  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  $46,457    $(94,556  $10,289  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities.Cash from operations includes:

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2018     2017     2016 
   (in thousands) 

Net cash from operating activities

  $236,668     $141,926     $    140,782 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (467,479     (121,551     (44,303

Net cash from (used in) financing activities

   14,861(1)       288,751(2)       (62,377

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

   (4,297     10,716      (2,065
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(2)

  $    (220,247)(1)     $     319,842(2)      $32,037 
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

cash received from customers;

cash paid to employees and suppliers;

cash paid for interest on our debt; and

cash paid or received for taxes.

(1)

Includes restricted cash of $317.4 million used to redeem $300.0 million of 2022 Senior Notes on January 5, 2018. Excluding such amount, in 2018 net cash used in financing activities was $332.3 million and the net increase in our cash and cash equivalents was $97.2 million.

(2)

Includes proceeds from $300.0 million of 2026 Senior Notes issued in December 2017 which were used to redeem, on January 5, 2018, $300.0 million of 2022 Senior Notes. Excluding such amount, in 2017 net cash used in financing activities was $11.2 million and the net increase in our cash and cash equivalents was $19.8 million.

We operate in a cyclical industry and our operating cash flows vary accordingly. Our principal operating cash expenditures are for labor, fiber, chemicals and debt service.

Working capital levels fluctuate throughout the year and are affected by maintenance downtime, changing sales patterns, seasonality and the timing of receivables and the payment of payables and expenses. Generally, finished goods inventories are increased prior to scheduled maintenance downtime to maintain sales volume while production is stopped. Our fiber inventories exhibit seasonal swings as we increase pulp log, sawlog and wood chip inventories to ensure adequate supply of fiber to our mills during the winter months. Changes in sales volume can affect the level of receivables and influence overall working capital levels. We believe our management practices with respect to working capital conform to common business practices.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Cash from operations includes:

cash received from customers;

cash paid to employees and suppliers;

cash paid for interest on our debt; and

cash paid or received for taxes.

Cash provided by operating activities in 20152018 increased to $159.2$236.7 million from $144.6$141.9 million in 20142017 and $36.3$140.8 million in 20132016 due to higher operating income. AnIn 2018, an increase in accounts receivables, excluding non-cash items,receivable used cash of $11.3$10.4 million. In 2017, an increase in accounts receivable used cash of $64.9 million, in 2015, comparedof which $8.3 million was related to $25.1 million in 2014 andour wood products segment. In 2016, a decrease in accounts receivables providingreceivable provided cash of $14.0 million in 2013. An increase in inventories, excluding non-cash items, used cash of $13.2 million in 2015, compared to a decrease in inventories providing cash of $6.4 million in 2014 and$9.5 million. In 2018, an increase in inventories usingused cash of $14.6$58.1 million. In 2017, an increase in inventories used cash of $20.0 million, reflecting an increase of $27.0 million from our wood products segment and a decrease of $7.0 million in 2013.our pulp segment. A decrease in inventories provided cash of $6.8 million in 2016. An increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses excluding non-cash items, provided cash of $9.7$38.0 million, including a legal cost award in 2015, compared2018. In 2017, an increase in

(76)


accounts payable and accrued expenses provided cash of $37.2 million, of which $15.6 million was related to our wood products segment, and in 2016 a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses usingused cash of $5.4 million in 2014 and $11.6 million in 2013.$10.3 million.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities.Activities

Cash from investing activities includes:

 

acquisitions of property, plant and equipment;equipment and businesses;

 

proceeds from the sale of assets; and

 

purchases and sales of short-term investments.

Investing activities in 20152018 usedcash of $467.5 million primarily related to the acquisitions of MPR for $344.6 million and Santanol for $35.7 million and capital expenditures of $87.0 million. Investing activities in 2017 usedcash of $121.6 million primarily related to the acquisition of our Friesau mill for $61.6 million and capital expenditures of $57.9 million. Investing activities in 2016 used cash of $49.8$44.3 million primarily related to capital expenditures of $46.5$42.5 million and intangible asset purchases of $3.8$1.8 million primarily related to our ERP project. Investing activities in 2014 used cash of $49.1 million, primarily related toEnterprise Resource Planning software.

In 2018, capital expenditures included large maintenance projects at our pulp mills, improvements to the digester at our Celgar mill, new chip screens, and bleach plant improvements at the Rosenthal mill, extension of $34.6 millionthe effluent treatment plant and intangible asset purchasesother wastewater improvement projects at the Stendal mill and upgrades to the planer mill and saw line and the replacement of $4.8 million, primarily related to our ERP project. Investing activities in 2013 used cash of $45.0 million, primarily due to capital spending of $45.7 million.

mobile equipment at the Friesau mill. In 2015,2017, capital expenditures which used cash of $46.5$57.9 million were primarily related to wastewater reductiona railcar acceptance system for logs and additional land for raw material storage at our Rosenthal mill, apre-bleach press system upgrade and large maintenance projects at our German mills designed to reduce wastewater fees that would otherwise be payableCelgar mill and the completion of an automated chip storage project at the Rosenthal mill.various other smaller projects. In 2014,2016, capital expenditures, which used cash of $34.6$42.5 million, were primarily related to a railcar acceptance system for logs and a lime kiln retrofit at our Rosenthal mill, a wastewater reduction project consisting of an evaporation plant upgrade and a project to reduce chloride levels in the process water at our Stendal mill and new chip screening project andwood harvesting equipment, a logistics and reload center and other maintenance projects at our Celgar mill and the automated chip storage project and a new tall oil plant at our Rosenthal mill. In 2013, capital expenditures, which used cash of $45.7 million, primarily related to Project Blue Mill.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities.Activities

Cash from financing activities includes:

 

issuanceissuances and payments of debt;

 

borrowings and payments under revolving lines of credit;

 

proceeds from issuances of stock; and

 

paymentpayments of cash dividends and repurchases of stock.

In 2015,2018, financing activities provided cash of $14.9 million primarily from the issuance of $350.0 million 2025 Senior Notes which, along with cash on hand, was used to finance our acquisition of MPR. In 2018, advances of $36.6 million on our revolving credit facilities were primarily used to finance capital projects at the Friesau mill and wood procurement activities. In 2018, we used $317.4 million to redeem $300.0 million of 2022 Senior Notes, $40.7 million for the payment of dividends and $10.1 million for debt issuance costs primarily related to the 2025 Senior Note issuance. In 2017, financing activities provided cash of $288.8 million, including $250.0 million from the issuance of the 2024 Senior Notes,

(77)


which was primarily used to redeem the 2019 Senior Notes at a cost of $234.9 million and $300.0 million from the issuance of the 2026 Senior Notes which along with cash on hand was used to redeem $300.0 million of 2022 Senior Notes in January 2018. In 2017, debt issuance costs related to two issuances of senior notes used cash of $11.6 million, dividend payments used cash of $29.9 million and scheduled payments in respect of our Stendal mill’s interest rate swap contract used cash of $6.9 million. In 2017, we also drew $22.3 million on a revolving credit facility to partially finance the acquisition of the Friesau mill and to build its working capital. In 2016, financing activities used cash of $56.7$62.4 million, primarily due to repaymentsour quarterly dividend payments of $29.7 million, the repurchase and cancellation of $23.0 million of our revolving credit facilities, which used cash of2019 Senior Notes for $23.1 million the redemption of the payment-in-kind note issued in respect of the purchase of the minority interest in our Stendal mill in 2014, which used cash of $10.8and $10.9 million for scheduled payments in respect of the Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract, which used cash of approximately $13.5 million, and our quarterly dividend payment, which used cash of $7.4 million. In 2014, financing activities used cash of $175.8 million, primarily due to the repurchase of the 2017 Senior Notes and the payout and discharge of the Stendal mill’s then credit facility, which used cash of approximately $891.0 million, and the payment of $20.2 million in associated costs, partially offset by the issuance of shares of our common stock, which provided cash of approximately $53.9 million, the issuance of our 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes, which provided cash of $650.0 million and borrowings on our revolving credit facilities, which provided cash of $26.3 million. In 2014, we received $6.7 million in

government grants. In 2013, financing activities provided net cash of $15.2 million, primarily due to borrowings by the Stendal mill under a project loan facility for Project Blue Mill, which provided cash of $22.2 million, and the issuance of an additional $50.0 million of 2017 Senior Notes, which provided cash of $52.3 million, partially offset by principal repayments under Stendal’s project finance facility, which used cash of $55.0 million. In 2013, we received $9.3 million in government grants.interest rate swap.

Balance Sheet Data

The following table is a summary of selected financial information for the dates indicated:

 

  December 31, 
  December 31,   2018   2017 
  2015   2014   (in thousands) 
Financial Position  (in thousands)     

Cash and cash equivalents

  $99,629    $53,172    $240,491   $143,299(1)  

Working capital

  $284,390    $242,364    $615,311   $421,873 

Total assets

  $    1,182,817    $    1,306,229    $1,975,735   $1,724,710(2)  

Long-term liabilities

  $695,420    $751,846    $1,198,918   $743,578(2)  

Total equity

  $382,976    $438,880    $581,429   $550,666 

During 2015, as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus the euro and the Canadian dollar, we recorded a non-cash reduction in the carrying value of our net assets, consisting primarily of our fixed assets, denominated in euros and Canadian dollars. This non-cash reduction of approximately $123.0 million does not affect our net income, Operating EBITDA or cash flows but is reflected in our other comprehensive income (loss) and as a reduction to our total equity.

(1)

Excludes restricted cash held to redeem $300.0 million of 2022 Senior Notes on January 5, 2018.

(2)

In December 2017, we issued $300.0 million of 2026 Senior Notes and used the proceeds along with cash on hand to redeem, on January 5, 2018, $300.0 million of 2022 Senior Notes.

Sources and Uses of Funds

Our principal sources of funds are cash flows from operations and cash and cash equivalents on hand and our revolving credit facilities.hand. Our principal uses of funds consist of operating expenditures, capital expenditures and interest payments on our outstanding 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes.

The following table sets out our total capital expenditures and interest expense for the periods indicated:

 

  Year Ended December 31,   Year Ended December 31, 
  2015   2014   2013   2018   2017   2016 
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Capital expenditures

  $        46,536    $        34,612    $        45,707    $        87,012   $        57,915   $        42,526 

Cash paid for interest expense(1)

  $51,975    $65,013    $65,747    $40,278   $45,908   $50,159 

Interest expense(2)

  $51,464   $54,796   $51,575 

 

(1)

Amounts differ from interest expense which includesnon-cash items. See supplemental disclosure of cash flow information from our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

(2)

Interest on our 2022 Senior Notes is paid semi-annually in June and December of each year. In March 2017, we redeemed our 2019 Senior Notes and, in January 2018, we redeemed $300.0 million of our 2022 Senior Notes. Interest on our 2024Senior Notes is paid semi-annually in February and August of each year and interest on our 2025 Senior Notes and on our 2026 Senior Notes is paid semi-annually in January and July of each year, commencing in July 2019 and July 2018, respectively. See Item 1. “Business – Description of Certain Indebtedness” for further information.

In 2018, we expended $40.7 million to pay four quarterly dividends of $0.125 per common share.

As at December 31, 2015,2018, our cash and cash equivalents were $99.6(excluding restricted cash) increased to $240.5 million compared to cash and cash equivalents of $53.2from $143.3 million at the end of 2014. As at the end of 2015, we also had cash of $9.2 million held by Stendal used to secure the Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract.2017.

(78)


As at December 31, 2015,2018, we had approximately $137.0$184.5 million available under our revolving credit facilities. Subsequently, in 2019, we established the C$60.0 million MPR Working Capital Facility.

As at December 31, 2015,2018, we had no material commitments to acquire assets or operating businesses.

In 2016,2019, excluding amounts being financed through government grants and expected insurance proceeds, we currently expect capital expenditures to be approximately $56.0$130 million primarily related to the replacement of mobile equipment at the Stendal mill, the retrofit of the lime kiln and rail acceptance system for logs and other maintenance projects at the Rosenthal mill and maintenance projects and the purchase of equipment for our second pass harvesting project at the Celgar mill.$150 million.

We currently consider the majority of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no U.S. income tax has been provided on such earnings. However, if we were required to repatriate funds to the United States, we believe that we currently could repatriate the majority thereof without incurring any material amount of taxes as a result of our shareholder advances and U.S. tax loss carryforwards.reform. However, it is currently not practical to estimate the income tax liability that might be incurred if such earnings were remitted to the United States. Substantially all of our undistributed earnings are held by our foreign subsidiaries outside of the United States.

Based upon the current level of operations and our current expectations for future periods in light of the current economic environment, and in particular, current and expected pulp and lumber pricing and foreign exchange rates, we believe that cash flow from operations and available cash, together with available borrowings under our revolving credit facilities, will be adequate to finance the capital requirements for our business including the payment of our quarterly dividend duringdividendduring the next 12 months.

In the future we may make acquisitions of businesses or assets or commitments to additional capital projects. To achieve the long-term goals of expanding our assets and earnings, including through acquisitions, capital resources will be required. Depending on the size of a transaction, the capital resources that will be required can be substantial. The necessary resources will be generated from cash flow from operations, cash on hand, borrowing against our assets or the issuance of securities.

Credit Facilities and Debt Covenants

We had the following principal amounts outstanding under our credit facilities 2019 Senior Notes and 2022 Senior Notes as at the dates indicated:

 

   December 31, 
   2015   2014 
   (in thousands) 

Stendal Revolving Credit Facility

  $-    $25,412  

Rosenthal Loan Facility

  $-    $-  

Rosenthal revolving €5.0 million facility

  $-    $-  

Celgar Working Capital Facility

  $-    $-  

2019 Senior Notes

  $        250,000    $    250,000  

2022 Senior Notes

  $400,000    $400,000  
   December 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (in thousands) 

German Facility(1)

  $58,968   

Stendal revolving credit facility

    $ - 

Rosenthal joint revolving facility

    $25,185 

Rosenthal €2.6 million loan

  $ -   $ - 

Celgar Working Capital Facility

  $ -   $ - 

2022 Senior Notes

  $        100,000   $        400,000(2)  

2024 Senior Notes

  $250,000   $250,000 

2025 Senior Notes

  $350,000   

2026 Senior Notes

  $300,000   $300,000 

(1)

This facility was entered into in December 2018 and replaced the Stendal revolving credit facility, the Rosenthal joint revolving facility and the Mercer Holz GmbH revolving credit facility.

(2)

In December 2017, we issued $300.0 million of 2026 Senior Notes and on January 5, 2018, we redeemed $300.0 million of our 2022 Senior Notes. See Item 1. “Business – Description of Certain Indebtedness” for further information.

For a description of such indebtedness, see Item 1. “Business – Description of Certain Indebtedness”.

(79)


Certain of our long-term obligations contain various financial tests and covenants customary to these types of arrangements.

Under the Stendal Revolving CreditGerman Facility, our Stendal millthe Obligors must not exceed a ratio of net debt to EBITDA of 2.50:3.50:1 in any12-month period and there must be a ratiomaintain defined capital of EBITDA to interest expense equal to or in excess of 1.20:1 for each 12-month period. Additionally, current assets to current liabilities must equal or exceed 1.1:1.

Under the Rosenthal Loan Facility, our Rosenthal mill must not exceed a ratio of net debt to EBITDA of 3:1 in any 12-month period and there must be a ratio of EBITDA to interest expense equal to or in excess of 1.2:1.0 for each 12 month period. Additionally, current assets to current liabilities must equal or exceed 1.1:1.0.less than €400.0 million.

The Celgar Working Capital Facility includes a covenant that, for so long as the excess amount under the facility is less than C$5.0 million, then until it becomes equal to or greater than such amount, the Celgar mill must maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.1:1.0 for each12-month period.

The Stendal Revolving CreditGerman Facility is provided by a syndicate of foursix financial institutions and each of our Celgar Working Capital Facility and our Rosenthal facilities are eachMPR Working Capital Facility is provided by one financial institution. To date we have not experienced any reductions in credit availability with respect to these credit facilities. However, if any of these financial institutions were to default on their commitment to fund, we could be adversely affected.

The MPR Working Capital Facility includes a covenant that so long as the excess amount under the facility is less than the greater of 10% of the borrowing base thereunder or C$4.5 million, MPR must comply with a 1.00:1.00 fixed charge coverage ratio.

The indentures governing the 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes do not contain any financial maintenance covenants and there are no scheduled principal payments until maturity. Interest on our 2019 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1, commencing June 1, 2015, at the rate of 7.000% and they mature in December 2019. Interest on our 2022 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1, commencing June 1, 2015, at the rate of 7.750%7.75% and they mature in December 2022. Interest on our 2024 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1, 2017, at the rate of 6.50% and they mature in February 2024. Interest on our 2025 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15, commencing July 15, 2019, at the rate of 7.375% and they mature in January 2025. Interest on our 2026 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15, commencing July 15, 2018, at the rate of 5.50% and they mature in January 2026.

As at December 31, 2015,2018, we were in full compliance with all of the covenants of our indebtedness.

Off-Balance-Sheet Activities

At December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, we had nooff-balance sheet arrangements.

(80)


Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table sets out our contractual obligations and commitments as at December 31, 2015.2018:

 

  Payments Due By Period   Payments Due By Period 

Contractual Obligations(1)

  2016   2017-2018   2019-2020   Beyond 2020   Total   2019   2020-2021   2022-2023   Beyond 2023   Total 
  (in thousands)   (in thousands) 

Debt(2)

  $-    $-    $250,000    $400,000    $650,000    $ -   $ -   $158,968   $    900,000   $1,058,968 

Interest rate derivative

   10,380     6,533     -     -     16,913  

Interest on debt(3)

   49,749     99,022     78,826     59,417     287,014     58,039        136,441        128,494    88,094    411,068 

Capital lease obligations(4)

   3,333     7,081     6,381     4,505     21,300     6,302    7,042    6,688    17,025    37,057 

Operating lease obligations(5)

   1,380     2,527     772     -     4,679     3,309    5,680    4,614    5,360    18,963 

Purchase obligations(6)

   1,448     384     -     -     1,832     36,831    55,751    48,738    4,215    145,535 

Other long-term liabilities(7)

   3,597     5,988     6,184     16,063     31,832     7,864    9,754    10,553    30,084    58,255 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $    69,887    $    121,535    $    342,163    $    479,985    $    1,013,570    $    112,345   $214,668   $358,055   $1,044,778   $    1,729,846 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

We have identified approximately $4.6$8.8 million of asset retirement obligations. However, due to the uncertain timing related to these potential liabilities, we are unable to allocate the payments in the contractual obligations table.

(2)

This reflects the future principal payments due under our long-term debt obligations. See Item 1. “Business – Description of Certain Indebtedness” and Note 68 to our consolidated financial statements included herein for a description of such indebtedness.

(3)

Amounts presented for interest payments assume that all debt outstanding as of December 31, 20152018 will remain outstanding until maturity, and interest rates on variable rate debt in effect as of December 31, 20152018 will remain in effect until maturity.

(4)

Capital lease obligations relate to transportation vehicles and production equipment. These amounts reflect principal and imputed interest.

(5)

Operating lease obligations relate to land, transportation vehicles and other production and office equipment.

(6)

Purchase obligations relate primarily totake-or-pay contracts, including for purchases of raw materials, made in the ordinary course of business.

(7)

Other long-term liabilities relate primarily to future payments that will be made for post-employment benefits. Those amounts are estimated using actuarial assumptions, including expected future service, to project the future obligations. Additionally, the balance also includes pension funding which is calculated on an annual basis. Consequently, the 2016 amount includes $0.7 million related to pension funding.

Foreign Currency

Effective October 1, 2013, ourOur reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. However, we hold certain assets and liabilities in euros and Canadian dollars and the majority of our expenditures are denominated in euros or Canadian dollars. Accordingly, our consolidated financial results are subject to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

We translate foreign denominated assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars at the rate of exchange on the balance sheet date. Equity accounts are translated using historical exchange rates. Unrealized gains or losses from these translations are recorded in our Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)other comprehensive income (loss) and do not affect our net earnings.

In the year ended December 31, 2015, we reported a net $123.0 million foreign currency translation loss and, as a result, the cumulative foreign exchange translation loss reported within2018, accumulated other comprehensive loss increased by $69.2 million to $156.2a loss of $128.2 million, as at December 31, 2015. Inprimarily due to the year ended December 31, 2014, we reported a net $81.0 million foreign currency translation loss.adjustment.

Based upon the exchange rate at December 31, 2015,2018, the U.S. dollar increased bywas approximately 10% in value5% stronger against the euro and increased by approximately 16% in value8% stronger against the Canadian dollar since December 31, 2014.2017. See Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk”.

Credit Ratings of 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes

We and our Senior Notes are rated by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services, referred to as “S&P”, and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., referred to as “Moody’s”,.

S&P and Moody’s base their assessment of the credit risk on our 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes on the business and financial profile of Mercer Inc. and our restricted subsidiaries under the indentures governing the 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes. As of December 31, 2015,2018, all of our subsidiaries are restricted subsidiaries. Factors that may affect our credit rating include changes in our operating performance and liquidity. Credit rating downgrades can adversely impact, among other things, future borrowing costs and access to capital markets.

In November 2015, S&P affirmed its

(81)


Moody’s rating on the 2019 and 2022our Senior Notes as B+ and a recovery rating of “3” but upgraded its outlook to “positive”. Moody’s affirmed its current rating on the 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes as B2is Ba3 and its outlook as “stable”is stable and S&P’s rating on our Senior Notes isBB- and its recovery rating is “3”.

Credit ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal by the assigning rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect both the amount and the timing of recording of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying note disclosures. Our management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. As the number of variables and assumptions affecting the probable future resolution of the uncertainties increase, these judgments become even more subjective and complex.

Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 1 to our audited annual consolidated financial statements included in Part IV of this annual report. While all of the significant accounting policies

are important to the consolidated financial statements, some of these policies may be viewed as having a high degree of judgment. On an ongoing basis using currently available information, management reviews its estimates, including those related to accounting for, among other things, pensionspension and other post-retirement benefit obligations, deferred income taxes (valuation allowance and permanent reinvestment), depreciation and amortization, future cash flows associated with impairment testing for long-lived assets, the allocation of the purchase price in a business combination to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, legal liabilities and contingencies. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates, and changes in these estimates are recorded when known.

The following accounting policies require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, and are subject to a fair degree of measurement uncertainty.

PensionsPension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Obligations

We maintain a defined benefit pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plan for certain employees at MPR and our Celgar mill which is funded based on actuarial estimates and requirements and arenon-contributory. We recognize the net funded status of the plan and we record net periodic benefit costs associated with these net obligations. As at December 31, 2015,2018, we had pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations aggregating $55.7$110.9 million and accumulated pension plan assets with a fair value of $29.4$84.1 million. Our 20152018 net periodic pension and other post-retirement benefit costs were $2.2$1.9 million. The amounts recorded for the net pension and other post retirementpost-retirement obligations include various judgments and uncertainties.

The following inputs are used to determine our net obligations and our net periodic benefit costs each year and the determination of these inputs requires judgment:

 

discount rate – used to determine the net present value of our pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations and to determine the interest cost component of our net periodic pension and other post-retirement benefit costs;

 

return on assets – used to estimate the growth in the value of invested assets that are available to satisfy pension obligations and to determine the expected return on the plan assets component of our net periodic pension costs;

 

mortality rate – used to estimate the impact of mortality on pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations;

 

(82)


rate of compensation increase – used to calculate the impact future pay increases will have on pension benefit obligations; and

 

health care cost trend rate – used to calculate the impact of future health care costs on other post-retirement benefit obligations.

For the discount rate, we use the rates available on high-quality corporate bonds with a duration that is expected to match the timing of expected pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations. High-quality corporate bonds are those with a rating of “AA” or better.

In determining the expected return on assets, we consider the historical long-term returns, expected asset mix and the active management premium.

For the mortality rate we use actuarially-determined mortality tables that are consistent with our historical mortality experience and future expectations for mortality of the employees who participate in our pension and other post-retirement benefit plans.

In determining the rate of compensation increase, we review historical compensation increases and promotions, while considering current industry conditions, the terms of collective bargaining agreements with employees and the outlook for the industry.

For the health care cost trend rate, we consider historical trends for these costs, as well as recently enacted healthcarehealth care legislation. We also compare our health care rate to those of our industry.

Variations in assumptions described above could have a significant effect on the pension and other post-retirement benefitbenefits net periodic benefit cost and obligation reported in our consolidated financial statements. For example, aone-percentage point change in any one of the following assumptions would have increased (decreased) our 20152018 net periodic benefit cost and our accrued benefit obligation as follows:

 

  Net periodic benefit cost     Accrued benefit obligation 
          Net periodic benefit cost               Accrued benefit obligation         1% increase     1% decrease     1% increase     1% decrease 
  

1% increase

 

1% decrease

 

1% increase

 

1% decrease

   ($ in thousands) 
Assumption  ($ in thousands)               

Discount rate

   33   (99 (6,730 7,714     306      (411     (57,629     77,300 

Return on assets

   (307 307   N/A   N/A     (450     512      -      - 

Rate of compensation

   20   (19 430   (425   183      (142     63,464      (58,204

Health care cost trend rate

   36   (39 613   (598   29      (33     508      (490

Deferred Taxes

As at December 31, 2015,2018, we had $23.2$1.4 million in deferred tax assets and $13.2$93.1 million in deferred tax liabilities, resulting in a net deferred tax assetliability of $10.0$91.7 million. Our tax assets are net of a $90.6$11.1 million valuation allowance. Our deferred tax assets are comprised primarily of tax loss and interest carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, bothall of which will reduce taxable income in the future. We assess the realization of these deferred tax assets at each reporting period to determine whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assetassets will be realized. Our assessment includes a review of all available positive and negative evidence, including, but not limited to, the following:

 

the history of the tax loss carryforwards and their expiry dates;

 

future reversals of temporary differences;

 

our historical and projected earnings; and

 

tax planning opportunities.

(83)


Significant judgment is required when evaluating the positive and negative evidence, specifically the Company’s estimates of future earnings. The weight given to negative and positive evidence is commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. Operating results during the most recent three-year period are generally given more weight than expectations of future profitability, which are inherently uncertain. A cumulative loss position during the most recent three-year period is considered significant negative evidence in assessing the realizability of deferred income tax assets that is difficult to overcome.

Once our evaluation of the evidence is complete, if we believe that it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, based on currently available information, an income tax valuation allowance is recorded against the deferred tax assets.

If market conditions improve or tax planning opportunities arise in the future, we may reduce our valuation allowance, resulting in future tax benefits. If market conditions deteriorate in the future, we may increase our valuation allowance, resulting in future tax expenses. Any change in tax laws may change the valuation allowances in future periods.

Property, Plant and Equipment

As at December 31, 2015,2018, we had property, plant and equipment recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheet of $762.4$1,029.3 million. In 2015,2018, we recorded depreciation and amortization for property, plant and equipment of $68.3$91.4 million.

The calculation of depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment requires us to apply judgment in selecting the remaining useful lives of the assets. The remaining useful life of an asset must address both physical and economic considerations. The remaining economic life of property, plant and equipment may be shorter than its physical life. The pulp industry in recent years has historically been characterized by considerable uncertainty in business conditions. Estimates of future economic conditions for our property, plant and equipment and therefore, their remaining useful economic life, require considerable judgment.

If our estimate of the remaining useful life changes, such a change is accounted for prospectively in our determination of depreciation and amortization. Actual depreciation and amortization charges for an individual asset may therefore be significantly accelerated if the outlook for its remaining useful life is shortened considerably.

We evaluate property, plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. In performing the review of recoverability, we estimate future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. The estimates of future cash flows, based on reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections, require management to make subjective judgments. In addition, the time periods for estimating future cash flows is often lengthy, which increases the sensitivity of the assumptions made. Depending on the assumptions and estimates used, the estimated future cash flows projected in the evaluation of property, plant and equipment can vary within a wide range of outcomes. Our management considers the likelihood of possible outcomes in determining the best estimate of future cash flows. If actual results are not consistent with the assumptions and judgments used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values, actual impairment losses could vary materially, either positively or negatively, from estimated impairment losses.

(84)


Business Combination

We allocate the total purchase of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the business combination date. In developing estimates of fair values for long-lived assets, including identifiable intangible assets, we utilize a variety of inputs including forecasted cash flows, discount rates, estimated replacement costs and depreciation and obsolescence factors. Determining the fair value for specifically identified intangible assets, such as contracts, involves judgment. We may refine our estimates and make adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed over a measurement period, not to exceed one year. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or the final determination of the values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments are charged to earnings. Subsequent actual results of the underlying business activity supporting the specifically identified intangible assets could change, requiring us to record impairment charges or accelerate the remaining useful life.

Contingent Liabilities

We are subject to lawsuits, investigations and other claims related to environmental, product and other matters, and are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters, as well as potential ranges of probable losses. We disclose contingent liabilities when there is a reasonable possibility that an ultimate loss may occur and we record contingent liabilities when it becomes probable that we will have to make payments and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.

Assessing probability of loss and estimating probable losses requires analysis of multiple factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

 

historical experience;

 

judgments about the potential actions of third partythird-party claimants and courts; and

 

recommendations of legal counsel.

Contingent liabilities are based on the best information available and actual losses in any future period are inherently uncertain. If estimated probable future losses or actual losses exceed our recorded

liability for such claims, we would record additional charges. These exposures and proceedings can be significant and the ultimate negative outcomes could be material to our operating results or liquidity in any given quarter or year.

New Accounting Standards

See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 15 of this annual report onForm10-K.

(85)


ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risks from changes in interest rates and associated with fluctuations in:

foreign currency exchange rates, particularlyrates;

prices for the products we manufacture;

fiber costs;

credit risk; and

interest rates.

For a discussion of our earnings sensitivities to foreign exchange rates, betweenpulp and lumber prices and fiber costs, see Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Sensitivities” on page 75 hereof.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We compete with producers from around the U.S.world, particularly Europe and North America, in our product lines. We sell our principal product, pulp, mainly in transactions denominated in dollars but sell certain other products including energy and European lumber in local currencies, being euros and Canadian dollars. Changes in the relative strength or weakness of the dollar versus the euro and the Canadian dollar affect our operating costs and margins. A stronger dollar lowers our operating costs but can in turn increase the cost of pulp to our customers and thereby create downward pressure on prices. On the other hand, a weaker dollar tends to increase our operating costs but tends to support higher pulp prices.

We are particularly sensitive to changes in the value of the dollar versus the euro and Canadian dollar. ChangesWe expect exchange rate fluctuations to continue to impact costs and revenues, but we cannot predict the magnitude or direction of this effect for any period, and there can be no assurance of any future effects.

Furthermore, certain of our assets and liabilities are denominated in euros and Canadian dollars. A depreciation of these currencies against the dollar will decrease the fair value of such financial instrument assets and an appreciation of these currencies against the dollar will increase the fair value of such financial instrument liabilities, thereby decreasing our fair value. An appreciation of these currencies against the dollar will increase the fair value of such financial instrument assets and a depreciation of these currencies against the dollar will decrease the fair value of financial instrument liabilities, thereby increasing our fair value. As a result, our earnings can be subject to the potentially significant effect of foreign currency translation gains or losses in respect of these euros and Canadian dollar items.

(86)


The following table provides information about our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations for the carrying amount of financial instruments sensitive to such fluctuations as at December 31, 2018 and expected cash flows from these instruments:

   As at December 31, 2018 
   Carrying
Value
   Fair
Value
     Expected maturity date 
Financial Instruments    2019     2020     2021     2022     2023     Thereafter 
   (in thousands) 

in euros

                            

Cash and cash equivalents

   70,075    70,075      70,075      -      -      -      -       

Accounts receivable

   62,842    62,842      62,842      -      -      -      -       

Accounts payable and other

   83,572    83,572      83,572      -      -      -      -       

Capital leases

   25,191    25,191      4,213      2,311      2,218      2,267      2,368      11,814  

Debt

   51,500    51,500      -      -      -      -      51,500       

in Canadian dollars

                            

Cash and cash equivalents

   36,908    36,908      36,908      -      -      -      -       

Accounts receivable

   18,557    18,557      18,557      -      -      -      -       

Accounts payable and other

   94,430    94,430      94,430      -      -      -      -       

Capital leases

   895    895      295      295      295      10      -       

Product Price Risk

Historically, economic and market shifts, fluctuations in capacity and changes in foreign currency exchange rates have created cyclical changes in prices, sales volume and margins for our products, particularly NBSKpulp and lumber. In general, our products are commodities that are widely available from other producers and, because these products have few distinguishing qualities from producer to producer, competition is based primarily on price which is determined by supply relative to demand. The overall levels of demand for the products we manufacture, and consequently our sales and profitability, reflect fluctuations in end user demand.

Fiber Price Risk

Fiber in the form of wood chips, pulp logs and sawlogs represents our largest operating cost. Fiber is a market-priced commodity and, as such, is subject to fluctuations in prices based on supply and demand. Increases in the prices of fiber will tend to increase our operating costs and reduce our operating margins.

Interest Rate Risk

Fluctuations in interest rates may affect our resultsthe fair value of operationsfixed interest rate financial instruments which are sensitive to such fluctuations. A decrease in interest rates may increase the fair value of such fixed interest rate financial instrument assets and an increase in interest rates may decrease the fair value of such fixed interest rate financial condition and, consequently,instrument liabilities, thereby increasing our fair value. An increase in interest rates may decrease the fair value of such fixed interest rate financial instrument assets and a decrease in interest rates may increase the fair value of such fixed interest rate financial instrument liabilities, thereby decreasing our fair value. We may seek to manage our interest rate risks through the use of interest rate derivatives.

(87)


The following tables provide information about our exposure to interest rate fluctuations for the financial instruments sensitive to such fluctuations as at December 31, 2018 and expected cash flows from these instruments:

   As at December 31, 2018 
   Total  Fair
Value
   Expected maturity date 
  2019     2020     2021   2022   2023   Thereafter 
   (in thousands, other than percentages) 

Liabilities

  

Long-term debt:

                   

Fixed rate ($)(1)(2)(3)(4)

   1,000,000     965,000            -      -    100,000    -    900,000 

Average interest rate

   6.63%     6.63%            -      -    7.75%    -    6.51% 

Variable rate ($)(5)

   58,968     58,968            -      -    -    58,968    - 

Average interest rate

   1.05%     1.05%            -      -    -    1.05%    - 

(1)

2022 Senior Notes bearing interest at 7.75%, principal amount $100.0 million.

(2)

2024 Senior Notes bearing interest at 6.50%, principal amount $250.0 million.

(3)

2025 Senior Notes bearing interest at 7.375%, principal amount $350.0 million.

(4)

2026 Senior Notes bearing interest at 5.50%, principal amount $300.0 million.

(5)

German Facility bearing interest at Euribor plus 1.05% to 2.00%.

Credit Risk

We are exposed to credit risk on the accounts receivable from our customers. In order to manage our credit risk, we have adopted policies which include the analysis of the financial position of our customers and the regular review of their credit limits. We also subscribe to credit insurance and, in some cases, require bank letters of credit. Our customers are mainly in the business of tissue, printing, paper converting and other consumer products, as well as lumber wholesale and retail.

Risk Management and Derivatives

We seek to manage these risks through internal risk management policies as well as the periodic use of derivatives. We may use derivatives to reduce or limit our exposure to interest rate and currency risks. We may also use derivatives to reduce or limit our exposure to fluctuations in pulp and lumber prices. We use derivatives to reduce our potential losses or to augment our potential gains, depending on our management’s perception of future economic events and developments. These types of derivatives are generally highly speculative in nature. They are also very volatile as they are highly leveraged given that margin requirements are relatively low in proportion to notional amounts.

Many of our strategies, including the use of derivatives, and the types of derivatives selected by us, are based on historical trading patterns and correlations and our management’s expectations of future events. However, these strategies may not be effective in all market environments or against all types of risks. Unexpected market developments may affect our risk management strategies during this time, and unanticipated developments could impact our risk management strategies in the future. If any of the variety of instruments and strategies we utilize is not effective, we may incur significant losses.

Derivatives

Derivatives are contracts between two parties where payments between the parties are dependent upon movements in the price of an underlying asset, index or financial rate. Examples of derivatives include swaps, options and forward rate agreements. The notional amount of the derivatives is the contract amount used as a reference point to calculate the payments to be exchanged between the two parties and the notional amount itself is not generally exchanged by the parties.

The principal derivatives we periodically use are interest rate derivatives, pulp price derivatives, energy derivatives and foreign exchange derivatives.

(88)


Interest rate derivatives include interest rate forwards (forward rate agreements) which are contractual obligations to buy or sell an interest-rate-sensitive financial instrument on a future date at a specified price. They also include interest rate swaps which areover-the-counter contracts in which two counterparties exchange interest payments based upon rates applied to a notional amount.

Pulp price derivatives include fixed price pulp swaps which are contracts in which two counterparties exchange payments based upon the difference between the market price of pulp and the notional amount in the contract.

Energy derivatives include fixed electricity forward sales and purchase contracts which are contractual obligations to buy or sell electricity at a future specified date. Our mills produce surplus electricity that we sell to third parties. As a result, we monitor the electricity market closely. Where possible and to the extent we think it is advantageous, we may sell into the forward market through forward contracts.

Foreign exchange derivatives include currency swaps which involve the exchange of fixed payments in one currency for the receipt of fixed payments in another currency. Such cross currency swaps involve the exchange of both interest and principal amounts in two different currencies. They also include foreign exchange forwards which are contractual obligations in which two counterparties agree to exchange

one currency for another at a specified price for settlement at apre-determined future date. Forward contracts are effectively tailor-made agreements that are transacted between counterparties in theover-the-counter market.

As at December 31, 2015 and 2014,2018, we had no outstanding derivatives.In2017, we had no outstanding derivatives, other than theour Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract.mill’s interest rate swap contract which matured and was terminated in October 2017.

However, in the future, we may from time to time use foreign exchange derivatives to convert some of our costs (including currency swaps relating to our long-term indebtedness) from euros to U.S. dollars as our principal product is priced in U.S. dollars. We have also converted some of our costs to U.S. dollars by issuing long-term U.S. dollar denominateddollar-denominated debt in the form of our 2019 and 2022 Senior Notes. We may also from time to time use pulp priceor lumber derivatives to fix price realizations and interest rate derivatives to fix the rate of interest on indebtedness.

In August 2002, Stendal entered into the Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract in connection with its long-term indebtedness relating to the Stendal mill to fix the interest rate thereunder at the then low level, relative to its historical trend and projected variable interest rate. Under the Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract, Stendal pays a fixed rate and receives a floating rate with the interest payments being calculated on a notional amount. The interest rates payable thereunder were swapped into fixed rates based on the Eur-Euribor rate for the repayment periods of the tranches under Stendal’s indebtedness. Stendal effectively converted its indebtedness from a variable interest rate loan into a fixed interest rate loan. The Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract was left in place following the refinancing of Stendal’s indebtedness in November 2014.

We record unrealized gains and losses on our outstanding derivatives when they are marked to market at the end of each reporting period and realized gains or losses on them when they are settled. We determine market valuations based primarily upon valuations provided by our counterparties.

We are exposed to very modest credit related risks in the event ofnon-performance by counterparties to derivative contracts. However, we do not expect that the counterparties, which are major financial institutions and large utilities, will fail to meet their obligations.

The following table and the notes thereto sets forth the maturity date, the notional amount, the recognized gain or loss and the strike and swap rates for derivatives that were in effect during 2015 and 2014:

 

       December 31, 2015    December 31, 2014

Derivative Instrument

 

Maturity Date

    Notional
Amount
    Recognized
Gain (Loss)
    Notional
Amount
    Recognized
Gain (Loss)
       (in millions)    (in thousands)    (in millions )    (in thousands)

Stendal interest rate swap(1)

 October 2017    $    209.0    $      (935)    $      304.7    $    11,501

(1)

In 2002, Stendal entered into the Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract, which are variable-to-fixed interest rate swaps, with respect to an aggregate maximum amount of approximately €612.6 million of the principal amount of the long-term indebtedness under its then credit facility. The remaining contract commenced in April 2005 for a notional amount of €612.6 million, with an interest rate of 5.28%, and the notional amount gradually decreases and the contract terminates in October 2017.

Interest Rate Risk

Fluctuations in interest rates may affect the fair value of fixed interest rate financial instruments which are sensitive to such fluctuations. A decrease in interest rates may increase the fair value of such fixed interest rate financial instrument assets and an increase in interest rates may decrease the fair value of such fixed interest rate financial instrument liabilities, thereby increasing our fair value. An increase in interest rates may decrease the fair value of such fixed interest rate financial instrument assets and a decrease in interest rates may increase the fair value of such fixed interest rate financial instrument liabilities, thereby decreasing our fair value. We may seek to manage our interest rate risks through the use of interest rate derivatives. For a discussion of our interest rate derivatives including maturities, notional amounts, gains or losses and swap rates, see “– Derivatives”.

The following tables provide information about our exposure to interest rate fluctuations for the financial instruments sensitive to such fluctuations as at December 31, 2015 and expected cash flows from these instruments:

   As at December 31, 2015 
   Total  Fair
Value
   Expected maturity date 
         2016             2017             2018           2019           2020       Thereafter 
   (in thousands, other than percentages) 

Liabilities

  

Long-term debt:

                   

Fixed rate ($)(1)(2)

   650,000    654,625     -       -       -     250,000     -     400,000  

Average interest rate

   7.46%    7.46%                  

   Notional
  Amount  
   Fair
Value
   Expected maturity date 
          2016           2017           2018           2019           2020       Thereafter 
Interest Rate Derivatives  (in thousands, other than percentages) 

Interest rate swap:

                

Variable to fixed ($)(3)

   208,965     (16,913)     69,606     139,359     -     -     -     -  

Average pay rate

   5.28%     5.28%     5.28%     5.28%     -     -     -     -  

Average receive rate

   0.03%     0.03%     0.03%     0.03%     -     -     -     -  

(1)

2019 Senior Notes bearing interest at 7.000%, principal amount $250.0 million.

(2)

2022 Senior Notes bearing interest at 7.750%, principal amount $400.0 million.

(3)

The Stendal Interest Rate Swap Contract.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. However, we hold financial instruments denominated in euros and Canadian dollars which are sensitive to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. A depreciation of these currencies against the U.S. dollar will decrease the fair value of such financial instrument assets and an appreciation of these currencies against the U.S. dollar will increase the fair value of such financial instrument liabilities, thereby decreasing our fair value. An appreciation of these currencies against the U.S. dollar will increase the fair value of such financial instrument assets and a depreciation of these currencies against the U.S. dollar will decrease the fair value of financial instrument liabilities, thereby increasing our fair value. We may seek to manage our foreign currency risks by utilizing foreign exchange rate derivatives. For a discussion of such derivatives including maturities, notional amounts, gains or losses and strike rates, see “– Derivatives”.

The following table provides information about our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations for the carrying amount of financial instruments sensitive to such fluctuations as at December 31, 2015 and expected cash flows from these instruments:

   As at December 31, 2015 
   Carrying
Value
   Fair
Value
   Expected maturity date 
Financial Instruments      

2016

   

2017

   

2018

   

2019

   

2020

   

Thereafter

 
   (in thousands) 

in euros

            

Cash and cash equivalents

   45,378     45,378     45,378     -     -     -     -     -    

Restricted cash

   8,500     8,500     4,469     4,031     -     -     -     -    

Accounts receivable

   76,319     76,319     76,319     -     -     -     -     -    

Accounts payable and other

   57,411     57,411     57,411     -     -     -     -     -    

Derivative financial instruments

   15,576     15,576     9,559     6,017     -     -     -     -    

in Canadian dollars

            

Cash and cash equivalents

   16,877     16,877     16,877     -     -     -     -     -    

Accounts receivable

   15,536     15,536     15,536     -     -     -     -     -    

Accounts payable and other

   29,223     29,223     29,223     -     -     -     -     -    

Pulp Price Risk

Fluctuations in the price of pulp will affect the fair value of pulp price swaps. A decrease in pulp prices will increase the fair value of the pulp price swaps and an increase in pulp prices will decrease the fair value of the pulp price swaps. As at December 31, 2015, we had no outstanding pulp price derivatives.

Energy Price Risk

We are subject to some energy price risk, primarily for natural gas purchases. Our electricity price risks are mitigated by the ability of all of our mills to produce renewable energy.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The consolidated financial statements and supplementary data required with respect to this Item 8, and as listed in Item 15 of this annual report on Form10-K, are included in this annual report on Form10-K commencing on page 91.102.

 

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

 

(89)


ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form10-K. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have

concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act.

It should be noted that any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions designed to obtain reasonable (and not absolute) assurance as to its effectiveness, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Mercer’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.GAAP.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of Mercer;

 

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and

 

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree orof compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of Mercer’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.2018. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth inInternal Control-Integrated Framework, as issued in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment and those criteria, management concluded that Mercer maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.2018.

The

(90)


We have excluded each of MPR and the Santanol Group, which we acquired on December 10, 2018 and October 18, 2018, respectively, from the assessment of the effectiveness of Mercer’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152018. The assets of MPR and the Santanol Group represent 22% and 2%, respectively, and the revenues of MPR and Santanol represent 2% and nil%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report which appears within.in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Controls

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules13a-15(f) and15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B.  OTHER

OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

(91)


PART III

ITEM 10.

ITEM 10.   DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Directors

We are governed by a board of directors, referred to as the “Board”, each member of which is elected annually. The following sets forth information relating to our directors and executive officers.

Jimmy S.H. Lee,Executive Chairman and Director, age 58,61, has served as a director since May 1985, as President and Chief Executive Officer from 1992 to July 2015 and as Executive Chairman since July 2015. In March 2016, Mr. Lee was appointed a director of Golden Valley Mines Ltd. Previously, during the period when MFC Bancorp Ltd. was our affiliate, he served as a director from 1986 and President from 1988 to December 1996 when it was spun out. Mr. Lee was also a director of Quinsam Capital Corp. from March 2004 to November 2007 and Fortress Paper Ltd. from August 2006 to April 2008. During Mr. Lee’s tenure with Mercer, we acquired the Rosenthal mill and converted it to the production of kraft pulp, constructed and commenced operations at the Stendal mill and acquired the Celgar mill.mill, the Friesau mill and MPR. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of British Columbia, Canada. Mr. Lee possesses particular knowledge and experience in our business as a “founder” and as our Chief Executive Officer for over 2324 years. He also has broad knowledge and experience in finance and banking, credit markets, international pulp markets, derivative risk management and capital allocation. Through his experience and background, Mr. Lee provides vision and leadership to the Board. Mr. Lee also provides the Board with insight and information regarding our strategy, operations and business.

David M. Gandossi,Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, age 58,61, has served as a director and as Chief Executive Officer and President since July 2015 and served as Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary from August 2003 to July 2015. His previous roles included Chief Financial Officer and other senior executive positions with Formation Forest Products and Pacifica Papers Inc. Since 2007, Mr. Gandossi has previously chaired a number of industry working committees or groups including the B.C. Pulp and Paper Task Force, a joint government industrythe BCBio-economy Transformation Council and labor effort mandated to identify measures to improve the competitiveness of the British Columbia pulp and paper industry.FPI National Research Advisory Committee. He also participated in the Pulp and Paper Advisory Committee to the BC Competition Council and was a member of B.C.’s Working Roundtable on Forestry. He is currently a Directordirector of FPInnovationsThe Forest Products Association of Canada (FPAC) and ChairThe Council of the FPI National Research Advisory Committee. He also co-chairs the BC Bio-economy Transformation Council, a collaborative effort between Government and industry.Forest Industries (COFI). Mr. Gandossi holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of British Columbia and is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of British Columbia in Canada.

Eric Lauritzen, age 77, has served as a director since June 2004. From 1994 until his retirement in 1998, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Harmac Pacific, Inc., a TSX-listed pulp producer that was acquired by Pope & Talbot Inc. From 1981 to 1994, he served as Vice President, Pulp and Paper Marketing of MacMillan Bloedel Limited, a TSX-listed North American pulp and paper company that was acquired by Weyerhaeuser Company Limited. Mr. Lauritzen has accumulated extensive executive, production and marketing experience in the pulp and paper industry, particularly in the softwood kraft pulp sector. He received his Bachelor of Commerce degree in 1961 from the University of British Columbia and his M.B.A. in 1963 from Harvard Business School. Mr. Lauritzen brings to the Board broad industry and leadership experience and understanding of the pulp business on a global basis, including sales and marketing. He also provides leadership to our Board on board practices, governance matters and succession planning in his role as the Lead Director of the Board.(ICABC).

William D. McCartney, age 60,63, has served as a director since January 2003. He has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of Pemcorp Management Inc., a corporate finance and management consulting firm, since its inception in 1990. From 1984 to 1990, he was a founding partner of Davidson & Company, Chartered Accountants, where he specialized in business advisory services. He has been involved

with numerous capital restructuring and financing events involving several public companies and brings substantial knowledge relating to the financial accounting and auditing processes. He is a member of the Local Advisory Committee of the TSX and TSX Venture Exchange. He is a chartered accountant and has been a member of the Canadian InstituteChartered Professional Accountants of Chartered AccountantsCanada since 1980. He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Administration from Simon Fraser University. Mr. McCartney has extensive experience in accounting, financial and capital markets. He provides the Board with insight and leads its review and understanding of accounting, financial and reporting matters. Mr. McCartney provides the Board experience and leadership on accounting and financial matters in his role as Chair of the Board’s Audit Committee.

Graeme A. Witts, age 77, has served as a director since 2003. He is also a Director and the former Chairman of Azure Property Group, SA, a European hotel group. He organized Sanne Trust Company Limited, a trust company located in the Channel Islands, in 1988 and was Managing Director from 1988 to 2000, when he retired. Mr. Witts has previous executive experience with the Procter & Gamble Company, as well as with Clarks shoes. He also has experience in government auditing and brings significant financial accounting knowledge from a global perspective. Mr. Witts is a fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and holds a masters degree in chemistry from Oxford University and a research degree in magnetic resonance. Mr. Witts has extensive experience in global accounting and financial matters, which he brings to the Board along with senior executive experience with large international companies. His broad knowledge and senior level experience in European businesses, accounting and financing matters provide valuable insights to the Board.

(92)


Bernard Picchi, age 66,69, has served as a director since June 2011. He is now Managing Director of Private Wealth Management for Palisade Capital Management, LLC, of Fort Lee, New Jersey, referred to as “Palisade”, and has been in that role since July 2009. Before joining Palisade, Mr. Picchi served as Managing Partner of Willow Rock Associates from August 2008 through June 2009, a company which advised securities firms on energy investments. From March 2003 through July 2008, Mr. Picchi served as Senior Energy Analyst at two independent research firms based in New York City, Foresight Research Solutions (2003-2005) and Wall Street Access (2006-2008). From 1999 through 2002, he was Director of U.S. Equity Research at Pittsburgh-based Federated Investors, where he also managed the Capital Appreciation Fund, a5-star rated (during his tenure) $1.5 billion equity mutual fund. Before Federated Investors, Mr. Picchi enjoyed a20-year career on Wall Street (Salomon Brothers, Kidder Peabody, and Lehman Brothers) both as an award-winning energy analyst and as an executive (Director of U.S. Equity Research at Lehman in themid-1990s). He began his post-college career at Mellon Bank in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Mr. Picchi holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Foreign Service from Georgetown University, and he has achieved the professional designation Chartered Financial Analyst. He has also served on variousnon-profit boards, most notably that of the Georgetown University Library on which he has served for the past 30 years. Mr. Picchi brings to our Board his significant experience and financial expertise in the capital markets, investments and analysis of public companies. His broad experience in the capital markets and particularly as a financial analyst and wealth manager provide the Board with valuable insight into the expectations, concerns and interests of investors, Shareholdersshareholders and the capital markets generally.

James Shepherd, age 63,66, has served as a director since June 2011. He is also currently a director of Buckman Laboratories International Inc. Mr. Shepherd was President and Chief Executive Officer of Canfor Corporation from 2004 to 2007 and Slocan Forest Products Ltd. from 1999 to 2004. He is also the former President of Crestbrook Forest Industries Ltd. and Finlay Forest Industries Limited and the former Chairman of the Forest Products Association of Canada. Mr. Shepherd has previously served as a director of Conifex Timber Inc., Canfor Corporation and Canfor Pulp Income Fund (now Canfor Pulp Products Inc.). Mr. Shepherd holds a degree in Mechanical Engineering from Queen’s University. Mr. Shepherd has held several chief executive officer leadership and other senior positions in the forest industry. As a result, Mr. Shepherd brings to the Board extensive senior executive experience relevant to our operations and an

understanding of all aspects of the forest products business, ranging from fiber harvesting to lumber and pulp and paper operations. He also brings to our Board significant experience and background in the designing, execution and implementation of large, complex capital projects at large manufacturing facilities like our mills.

R. Keith Purchase, age 71,74, has served as a director since June 2012. Mr. Purchase was Executive Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer for MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. from 1998 to 1999, President and Chief Executive Officer of TimberWest Forest Ltd. from 1994 to 1998 and Managing Director of Tasman Pulp and Paper from 1990 to 1994. Mr. Purchase was previously a director of Catalyst Paper Corporation and Chair of its board of directors. Mr. Purchase has held several very senior positions in significant companies involved in the forestry industry. He brings to the Board extensive senior executive experience relevant to the Company’s operations, as well as significant board of director leadership experience from a wide variety of companies.

Nancy OrrMarti Morfitt, age 65,61, has served as a director since May 2013.2017. Ms. OrrMorfitt is alsocurrently the President and Chief Executive Officer of River Rock Partners, Inc., a business consulting group based in Naples, Florida. Ms. Morfitt was the Chief Executive Officer of Airborne, Inc. from 2009 to 2012, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer and a Director of CNS, Inc. and the VP, Meals US of the Pillsbury Company from 1982 to 1998. She currently serves as a director of Protocol Biomass Corp., Prometic Life SciencesGraco Inc. and Ressources Québec,lululemon athletica, inc. Ms. Morfitt brings a subsidiarytrack record of Investissement Québec. Ms. Orr’s previous experience includes serving as President of Dynamis Group Inc. from 1991 to 2007, a private company involvedindustry leading business performance in the energy and wood recycling sectors in Europe and the United States. Ms. Orr also served as Interim Chief Financial Officer of Redline Communications Inc., where she also served as a director, Chair of its Audit Committee and a member of its Compensation Committee.

(93)


consumer packaged goods industry. She brings to the Board significantextensive senior executive experience, as a senior executive, director and audit and compensation committee member ofwell as significant public company board experience from a wide variety of publicly tradedcompanies.

Alan Wallace, age 59, has served as a director since June 2018. Mr. Wallace is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Peloton Advisors Inc., a financial advisory firm working with private and public companies on mergers and government corporations, includingacquisitions, financial and strategic transactions and he is based in Vancouver, British Columbia. Mr. Wallace was the BankVice Chairman, Investment Banking, CIBC World Markets Inc. from 1987 to 2013 where he was also theCo-Head of Canada, Dundee Wealth Management Inc., Fibrek Inc., Donohue Inc., les Services Financiers CDPQ – la Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, H.E.C. Montréalits Paper and FRV Media Inc. Ms. Orr is a member of the Women Corporate Directors and a Fellow member of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Quebec andForest Products Group from 1995 to 2013. Mr. Wallace holds a Master of Business Administration from Queen’sthe University of Chicago and a Bachelor of Arts degreeApplied Science from the University of Western Ontario. Ms. OrrToronto. Mr. Wallace has significant capital markets and mergers and acquisitions experience, including relating to debt and equity financings, corporate credit facilities and financial advisory assignments. He also has extensive forest products experience relating to financings and strategic transactions in the industry. He brings to the Boardboard extensive experience and knowledge in the forest products industrycapital markets and corporate strategic review.

Linda Welty, age 63, has served as a director since June 2018. Ms. Welty is currently an independent director of Huber Engineered Materials, a global manufacturer of engineered specialty ingredients, a portfolio company of J.M. Huber Corporation and has served in financialthat role since 2014. She currently serves as chairman and accounting matters.a director of the Atlanta Chapter of the National Association of Corporate Directors, whose mission is to advance excellence in corporate governance. She providesis the Board with valuable experiencePresident and insight into boardChief Executive Officer of Welty Strategic Consulting, LLC, an advisory firm focused on the development and governance practicesexecution of value creation strategies. From 2010 to 2011 she served as a director and accounting matters.member of the special committee of Massey Energy Company. She served as an independent director of Vertellus Specialties, Inc. from 2007 to 2016. Ms. Welty was President and Chief Operating Officer of Flint Ink Corp., a global producer of printing inks for packaging and publication from 2003 to 2005. From 1998 to 2003, she served as President of the Specialty Group of H.B. Fuller Company, a global manufacturer of adhesives, sealants and coatings. She also served for over twenty years in global leadership roles for Hoechst AG and its former U.S. subsidiary, Celanese. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering from the University of Kansas.

Other Executive Officers

David K. Ure, age 48,51, returned to Mercer in September 2013, assuming the role of Senior Vice President, Finance from September 2013 to July 2015 and the role of Chief Financial Officer and Secretary from July 2015. Prior to serving as Vice President, Finance of Sierra Wireless Inc., Mr. Ure was Vice President, Controller at Mercer from 2006 to 2010. He has also served as Controller at various companies including Catalyst Paper Corp., Pacifica Papers Inc., and Trojan Lithograph Corporation, as well as CFOChief Financial Officer and Secretary of Finlay Forest Industries Inc. Mr. Ure has over 15 years’ experience in the forest products industry. He is currently a director of FPInnovations and has also served on variousnon-profit boards in the neuro developmental research, child disability and family support spaces and currently sits on the boards of Kids Brain Health Network Inc., Semiahmoo House Society and Peninsula Estates Housing Society. He holds a Bachelor of Commerce in Finance from the University of British Columbia, Canada and is a member of the Certified General Accountants’ AssociationChartered Professional Accountants of Canada.

Adolf Koppensteiner, age 57, has been Chief Operating Officer since January 1, 2018 and has served as Managing Director, Operations and Technical of the Stendal mill since October 2013, prior to which he served as Mill Manager at the Rosenthal mill since joining Mercer in 2007. In the past, Mr. Koppensteiner was Managing Director of Kvaerner Central Europe, where he was responsible for sales and service for fifteen years. His whole career has been in the pulp and paper industry, where he has held a variety of positions building up significant experience in engineering, project work, and pulp millstart-ups, as well as the development and optimization of operating processes.

(94)


Leonhard Nossol, age 58,61, has served as our Group Controller for Europe since August 2005. He has also been Managing Director of Rosenthal since 1997 and the sole Managing Director of Rosenthal since 2005. Before joining Mercer, Mr. Nossol was Director, Finance and Administration for a German household appliance producer from 1992 to 1997. Prior to this, he was Operations Controller at Grundig AG (consumer electronics) in Nürnberg. Mr. Nossol has been a member of the board of directors of the Pulp and Paper Association of Germany since 2014 and was elected as the speaker of the forest and wood unit of such association since 2014. He has been a member of the German Industry Federation’s (BDI) Tax Committee since 2003. He was elected President of the German Wood Users Association (AGR) in 2013. He is also a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Germany’s Thünen Institute, the Federal research institute for forestry, fishery and agriculture. Mr. Nossol holds a Political Science degree from Freie Universität Berlin and a degree in Business Management from the University of Applied Sciences in Berlin.

Richard Short, age 48,51, has served as Vice President, Controller since February 2014 and as Controller from November 2010 to February 2014, prior to which he served as Controller and Director,

Corporate Finance since joining Mercer in 2007. Previous roles include Controller, Financial Reporting from 2006 to 2007 and Director, Corporate Finance from 2004 to 2006 with Catalyst Paper Corporation and Assistant Controller at theThe Alderwoods Group Inc. Mr. Short holds a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology from the University of British Columbia and has been a member of the Canadian InstituteChartered Professional Accountants of Chartered AccountantsCanada since 1993.

David M. Cooper, age 62, has served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Europe since 2005. Mr. Cooper previously held a variety of senior positions around the world at Sappi Ltd. from 1982 to 2005. These roles included the sales and marketing of various pulp and paper grades and the management of a manufacturing facility. Mr. Cooper has more than thirty years of diversified experience in the international pulp and paper industry.

Eric X. Heine, age 52,55, has served as Vice President, of Sales, Marketing and MarketingLogistics for Asia and North America and Asia since June 2005. Mr. Heine was previously Vice President Pulp and International Paper Sales and Marketing for Domtar Inc. from 1999 to 2005. Mr. Heine has over twenty-five years of experience in the pulp and paper industry, including developing strategic sales channels and market partners to build corporate brands. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Forestry (Wood Science) from the University of Toronto, Canada.

Wolfram Ridder, age 54,57, has served as Vice President of Business Development since 2005, prior to which he served as Managing Director at Mercer’s Stendal mill from 2001 to 2005. Mr. Ridder also served as Vice President Pulp Operations, Assistant to CEO from 1999 to 2005 and Assistant Managing Director at the Rosenthal mill from 1995 to 1998. Prior to joining Mercer, Mr. Ridder worked as a Scientist for pulping technology development at the German Federal Research Center for Wood Science and Technology in Hamburg from 1988 to 1995. Mr. Ridder has a Master of Business Administration and a Master of Wood Science and Forest Product Technology from Hamburg University.

Genevieve Stannus, age 45,48, has served as Treasurer since July 2005, prior to which she served as Senior Financial Analyst since joining Mercer in August 2003. Prior to her role at Mercer, Ms. Stannus held Senior Treasury Analyst positions with Catalyst Paper Corporation and Pacifica Papers Inc. Ms. Stannus has over twenty years of experience in the forest products industry. She is a member of the Certified GeneralChartered Professional Accountants Association of Canada.

Brian Merwin, age 42,45, has served as Vice President, Strategic Initiatives since February 2009. Mr. Merwin previously held roles within Mercer such as Director, Strategic and Business Initiatives, and Business Analyst. He was a key member of the Celgar Energy Project, and was instrumental in the development of the B.C. Hydro energy purchase agreement and securing the ecoENERGY grant. Mr. Merwin has a Master of Business Administration from the Richard Ivey School of Business in Ontario, Canada and a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of British Columbia, Canada.

We also have experienced mill managers at all of our mills who have operated through multiple business cycles in the pulp industry.

(95)


The Board met fiveten times during 20152018 and each current member of the Board attended 100% at least 75%of the total number of such meetings and meetings of the committees of the Board on which they serve during their term. In addition, our independent directors regularly meet in separate executive sessions without any member of our management present. The Lead Director presides over these meetings. Although we do not have a formal policy with respect to attendance of directors at our annual meetings, all directors are encouraged and expected to attend such meetings if possible. All of our current directors attended our 20152018 annual meeting.

The Board has developed corporate governance guidelines in respect of: (i) the duties and responsibilities of the Board, its committees and officers; and (ii) practices with respect to the holding of regular quarterly and strategic meetings of the Board including separate meetings ofnon-management directors. The Board has established four standing committees, the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Human ResourceResources Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Environmental, Health and Safety Committee.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act and functionsandfunctions pursuant to a charter adopted by the directors. A copy of the current charter is incorporated by reference in the exhibits to this Form10-K and is available on our website at www.mercerint.com under the “Governance” link.www.mercerint.com/investors/governance. The function of the Audit Committee generally is to meet with and review the results of the audit of our financial statements performed by the independent registered public accountants andaccounting firmand to recommend the selection of an independent public accountants.registeredpublic accounting firm. The members of the Audit Committee are Mr. McCartney, Ms. Morfitt, and Mr. Shepherd and Ms. Orr,Wallace, each of whom is independent under applicable laws and regulations and the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Mr. McCartney is a Chartered Professional Accountant and a “financial expert” within the meaning of such term under theSarbanesSarbanes-Oxley-Oxley Act of 2002. The Audit Committee met four times during 2015.in 2018.

The Audit Committee has established procedures for: (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters; and (ii) the confidential and anonymous submission by our employees and others of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. A person wishing to notify us of such a complaint or concern should send a written notice thereof, marked “Private & Confidential”, to the Chairman of the Audit Committee, Mercer International Inc., c/o Suite 1120, 700 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 1G8.

Compensation and Human ResourceResources Committee

The Board has established a Compensation and Human ResourceResources Committee. The Compensation and Human ResourceResources Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the strategy and design of our compensation,equity-based and benefits programs. The Compensation and Human ResourceResources Committee functions pursuant to a charter adopted by the directors, a copy of which is available on our website at www.mercerint.comwww.mercerint.com/investors/governance in the Corporate Governance Guidelines under the “Governance” link.Guidelines. The Compensation and Human ResourceResources Committee is also responsible for approving all compensation actions relating to executive officers. The members of the Compensation and Human ResourceResources Committee are Mr. Picchi, Mr. Witts,Shepherd, Ms. Morfitt and Mr. Purchase and Ms. Orr,Wallace, each of whom is independent under applicable laws and regulations and the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The Compensation and Human ResourceResources Committee met four times during 2015.in 2018.

(96)


Governance and Nominating Committee

The Board has established a Governance and Nominating Committee comprised of Mr. Lauritzen,Purchase, Mr. McCartney and Mr. Witts,Ms. Welty, each of whom is independent under applicable laws and regulations and the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The Governance and Nominating Committee functions pursuant to a charter adopted by the directors, a copy of which is incorporated by reference in the exhibits to this Form10-K and is available on our website at www.mercerint.comwww.mercerint.com/investors/governance in the Corporate Governance Guidelines under the “Governance” link.Guidelines. The purpose of the committee is to: (i) manage the corporate governance system of the Board; (ii) assist the Board in fulfilling its duties to meet applicable

legal and regulatory and self-regulatory business principles and codes of best practice; (iii) assist in the creation of a corporate culture and environment of integrity and accountability; (iv) in conjunction with the Lead Director, monitor the quality of the relationship between the Board and management; (v) review management succession plans; (vi) recommend to the Board nominees for appointment to the Board; (vii) lead the Board’s annual review of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance; and (viii) set the Board’s forward meeting agenda. The Governance and Nominating Committee met four times in 2015.2018.

Environmental, Health and Safety Committee

The Board established an Environmental, Health and Safety Committee in 2006, currently comprised of Mr. Shepherd, Mr. Purchase, Ms. Welty, Mr. Lee and Mr. Lee,Gandossi, to review on behalf of the Board the policies and processes implemented by management, and the resulting impact and assessments of all our environmental, health and safety related activities. The Environmental, Health and Safety Committee functions pursuant to a charter adopted by the directors, a copy of which is available on our website at www.mercerint.comwww.mercerint.com/investors/governance in the Corporate Governance Guidelines underGuidelines. More specifically, the “Governance” link. More specifically,purpose of the Environmental, Health and Safety Committee is to: (i) review and approve, and if necessary revise, our environmental, health and safety policies and environmental compliance programs; (ii) monitor our environmental, health and safety management systems including internal and external audit results and reporting; and (iii) provide direction to management on the frequency and focus of external independent environmental, health and safety audits. The Environmental, Health and Safety Committee met four times in 2015.2018.

Lead Director/Deputy Chairman

The Board appointed Mr. LauritzenPurchase as Lead Director in 2012.2018. The role of the Lead Director is to provide leadership to thenon-management directors on the Board and to ensure that the Board can operate independently of management and that directors have an independent leadership contact. The duties of the Lead Director include, among other things: (i) ensuring that the Board has adequate resources to support itsdecision-making process and ensuring that the Board is appropriately approving strategy and supervising management’s progress against that strategy; (ii) ensuring that the independent directors have adequate opportunity to meet to discuss issues without management being present; (iii) chairing meetings of directors in the absence of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; (iv) ensuring that delegated committee functions are carried out and reported to the Board; and (v) communicating to management, as appropriate, the results of private discussions among outside directors and acting as a liaison between the Board and the Chief Executive Officer.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Anti-Corruption Policy

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our directors, employees and executive officers and an Anti-Corruption Policy. The code and the policy are available on our website at www.mercerint.com under the “Governance” link.www.mercerint.com/investors/governance. Copies of the code and the policy may also be

(97)


obtained without charge upon request to Investor Relations, Mercer International Inc., Suite 1120, 700 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 1G8 (Telephone: (604)684-1099) or Investor Relations, Mercer International Inc., 14900 Interurban Avenue South, Suite 282, Seattle WA, U.S.A. 98168 (Telephone: (206) 674-4639).

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The information required under “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” is incorporated by reference from the proxy statement relating to our annual meeting to be held in 2016,2019, which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days of our most recently completed fiscal year.

ITEM 11.

ITEM 11.   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference from the proxy statement relating to our annual meeting to be held in 2016,2019, which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days of our most recently completed fiscal year.

 

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference from the proxy statement relating to our annual meeting to be held in 2016,2019, which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days of our most recently completed fiscal year.

 

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

Pursuant to the terms of the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the terms and conditions of all proposed transactions between us, any of our officers, directors or shareholders who beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock, or relatives or affiliates of any such officers, directors or shareholders, to ensure that such related party transactions are fair and are in our overall best interest and that of our shareholders. In the case of transactions with employees, a portion of the review authority is delegated to supervising employees pursuant to the terms of our written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

The Audit Committee has not adopted any specific procedures for conduct of reviews and considers each transaction in light of the facts and circumstances. In the course of its review and approval of a transaction, the Audit Committee considers, among other factors it deems appropriate:

 

Whetherwhether the transaction is fair and reasonable to us;

 

Thethe business reasons for the transaction;

 

Whetherwhether the transaction would impair the independence of one of ournon-employee directors; and

 

Whetherwhether the transaction is material, taking into account the significance of the transaction.

(98)


Any member of the Audit Committee who is a related person with respect to a transaction under review may not participate in the deliberations or vote respecting approval or ratification of the transaction, provided, however, that such director may be counted in determining the presence of a quorum at a meeting of the committee that considers the transaction.

The information called for by Items 404(a) and 407(a) of RegulationS-K required to be included under this Item 13 is incorporated by reference from the proxy statement relating to our annual meeting to be held in 2016,2019, which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days of our most recently completed fiscal year.

 

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated by reference from the proxy statement relating to our annual meeting to be held in 2016,2019, which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days of our most recently completed fiscal year.

PART IV

 

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

(a) (1)

Financial Statements

(a)(2)   Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(2)

Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(a)(3)   Exhibits

(a)(3)

Exhibits

Exhibits that are not filed herewith have been previously filed with the SEC and are incorporated herein by reference.

 

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger among Mercer International Inc., Mercer International Regco Inc. and Mercer Delaware Inc. dated December 14, 2005. Incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus filed on December 15, 2005.

3.1  

Articles of Incorporation of Mercer International Inc., as amended. Incorporated by reference fromForm 8-A filed March 2, 2006.

3.2  

Bylaws of Mercer International Inc. Incorporated by reference from Form8-A filed March 2, 2006.

4.1  

Indenture dated November 26, 2014 between Mercer International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 20192022 Senior Notes. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed November 28, 2014.

4.2  

Indenture dated November 26, 2014February 3, 2017 between Mercer International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 20222024 Senior Notes. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed November 28, 2014.February 3, 2017.

10.14.3

Indenture dated December 20, 2017 between Mercer International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 2026 Senior Notes. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed December 20, 2017.

(99)


4.4

Indenture dated December 7, 2018 between Mercer International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 2025 Senior Notes. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed December 7, 2018.

10.1*

Revolving Credit Facility Agreement dated December 19, 2018 amongZellstoff-und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH, Mercer Timber Products GmbH, Zellstoff Stendal GmbH, Mercer Holz GmbH, Stendal Pulp Holding GmbH, D&Z Holding GmbH, Zellstoff Stendal Transport GmbH, Mercer Pulp Sales GmbH, UniCredit Bank AG, Commerzbank AG, Luxembourg Branch, Credit Suisse AG, London Branch, LandesbankBaden-Württemberg and Royal Bank of Canada.

10.2  

Revolving Credit Facility Agreement dated November 25, 2014 among Zellstoff Stendal GmbH, UniCredit Bank AG, Credit Suisse AG, London Branch, Royal Bank of Canada and Barclays Bank PLC. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed November 28, 2014.

10.210.3  

Form of Trustee’s Indemnity Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and its Trustees. Incorporated by reference from Form10-K filed March 31, 2003.

10.3†

2004 Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference from Form S-8 filed June 16, 2004.

10.4†  

Mercer International Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.Plan, as amended. Incorporated by reference from Appendix A to Mercer International Inc.’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed April 24, 2014.

10.5†  

Employment Agreement effective SeptemberNovember 1, 2005 between Mercer International Inc. and Leonhard Nossol dated August 18, 2005. Incorporated by reference from Form10-Q filed May 6, 2008.

10.6†

Employment Agreement dated October 20, 2005 between Mercer Pulp Sales GmbH and David Cooper. Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed April 29, 2015.

10.7†  

Employment Agreement dated October 2, 2006 between Stendal Pulp Holding GmbH and Wolfram Ridder. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed October 3, 2006.

10.810.7  

Electricity Purchase Agreement effective January 27, 2009 between Zellstoff Celgar Limited Partnership and British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority. Incorporated by reference from Form10-K filed March 2, 2009. Certainnon-public information has been omitted from the appendices to Exhibit 10.9 pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the SEC. Suchnon-public information was filed with the SEC on a confidential basis. The SEC approved the request for confidential treatment in March 2009.

10.910.8  

Revolving Credit Facility Agreement dated August 19, 2009 among D&Z Holding GmbH, Zellstoff-und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH, D&Z Beteiligungs GmbH and ZPR Logistik GmbH and Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG. Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed August 24, 2009.

10.10

Extension, Amendment and Confirmation Letter dated October 4, 2012 among Zellstoff- und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH, D&Z Holding GmbH, D&Z Beteiligungs GmbH, ZPR Logistik GmbH, Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG and Mercer International Inc. Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed November 2, 2012.

10.11

SecondThird Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 2, 2013July 16, 2018 among Zellstoff Celgar Limited Partnership, as borrower, and the lenders from time to time parties thereto, as lenders, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, as agent. Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K10-Q filed May 8, 2013.July 26, 2018.

10.12*10.9  

Second Extension, AmendmentShare Purchase Agreement by and Confirmation Letter dated February 5, 2016 among Zellstoff- und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH, D&Z Holding GmbH, ZPR Logistik GmbHMarubeni Corporation, Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd. and Daishowa North America Corporation and Mercer International Inc. dated as of October 3, 2018. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed October 9, 2018.

10.13†10.10†  

Employment Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and David Ure dated August 12, 2013. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed on July 19, 2015.

10.1410.11  

First Amending Agreement dated October 21, 2014 betweenamong Zellstoff Celgar Limited Partnership, Mercer International Inc., as guarantor, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. Incorporated by reference from Form10-Q filed October 31, 2014.

10.15†10.12†  

Amendment to Employment Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and David Ure, dated July 17, 2015. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed July 19, 2015.

10.16†10.13†  

Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and Jimmy S.H. Lee, dated for reference September 29, 2015. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed September 28,29, 2015.

10.17†10.14†  

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and David M. Gandossi, dated for reference September 29, 2015. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed September 28,29, 2015.

(100)


14.110.15  

Code of Business ConductRegistration Rights Agreement dated December 7, 2018 between Mercer International Inc. and Ethics.Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, related to the 2025 Senior Notes. Incorporated by reference from Mercer International Inc.’s definitive proxy statementForm8-K filed on Schedule 14A filed August 11, 2003.December 7, 2018.

21.1*  

List of Subsidiaries of Registrant.

23.1*  

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

31.1*  

Section 302 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer.

31.2*  

Section 302 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer.

32.1*  

Section 906 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer.

32.2*  

Section 906 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer.

101*  

The following financial statements from the Company’s annual report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016,14, 2019, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets;Statements of Operations; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations;Comprehensive Income; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income;Balance Sheets; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

*

Filed herewith.

Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

ITEM 16.

FORM10-K SUMMARY

None.

 

(101)


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of

Mercer International Inc.

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Mercer International Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, (loss), changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows of Mercer International Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015.2018, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited Mercer International Inc.’s and its subsidiaries’the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2018, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Management

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and their results of operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A.9A of the 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our responsibility is to express an opinionopinions on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers Place, 250 Howe Street, Suite 1400, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 3S7

T: +1 604 806 7000, F: +1 604 806 7806

“PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership.

(102)


As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Mercer Peace River Pulp Ltd. and the Santanol Group from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, because they were acquired by the Company in purchase business combinations during 2018. We have also excluded Mercer Peace River Pulp Ltd. and the Santanol Group from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Mercer Peace River Pulp Ltd. and the Santanol Group are wholly-owned subsidiaries whose total assets and total revenues excluded from management’s assessment and our audit of internal control over financial reporting represent approximately 22% and 2% of total assets, respectively and approximately 2% and 0% of total revenues, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mercer International Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, Mercer International Inc. and its subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the COSO.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants

Vancouver, British ColumbiaCanada

February 12, 2016

14, 2019

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.

(103)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data)

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2018  2017  2016 
    

Revenues

  $    1,457,718   $    1,169,145   $    931,623  

Costs and expenses

    

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization

   1,032,101   866,019   700,494 

Cost of sales depreciation and amortization

   96,288   84,893   71,476 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   61,462   49,679   44,529 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

   267,867   168,554   115,124 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    

Other income (expenses)

    

Interest expense

   (51,464  (54,796  (51,575

Loss on settlement of debt (Note 8(a))

   (21,515  (10,696  (454

Legal cost award (Note 17(c))

   (6,951      

Acquisition commitment fee (Note 2)

   (5,250      

Other income (expenses)

   (5,417  873   (3,631
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other expenses

   (90,597  (64,619  (55,660
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before provision for income taxes

   177,270   103,935   59,464 

Provision for income taxes

   (48,681  (33,452  (24,521
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

  $128,589  $70,483  $34,943 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    

Net income per common share

 

Basic

  $1.97  $1.09  $0.54 

Diluted

  $1.96  $1.08  $0.54 
    

Dividends declared per common share

  $0.50  $0.47  $0.46 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(104)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands of U.S. dollars)

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
       2018          2017          2016     

Net income

  $    128,589  $    70,483  $    34,943 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes

    

Foreign currency translation adjustment

   (76,920  120,509   (14,369

Change in unrecognized losses and prior service costs related to defined benefit pension plans, net of tax of $424 (2017 and2016 - $nil)

   7,730   5,763   675 

Change in unrealized gains/losses on marketable securities, net of taxes of $nil in all years.

   21   (4  (1
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes

   (69,169  126,268   (13,695
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  $59,420  $196,751  $21,248 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(105)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

 

   December 31, 
   2015   2014 

ASSETS

    

Current assets

    

Cash and cash equivalents

  $99,629     $53,172   

Restricted cash (Note 14)

   9,230      10,286   

Accounts receivable (Note 2)

   134,254      141,088   

Inventories (Note 3)

   141,001      146,576   

Prepaid expenses and other

   4,697      6,745   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

   388,811      357,867   
    

Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 4)

   762,391      883,150   

Intangible and other assets

   8,461      8,925   

Deferred income tax (Note 8)

   23,154      56,287   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $1,182,817     $1,306,229   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
    

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Current liabilities

    

Accounts payable and other (Note 5)

  $96,032     $102,225   

Dividends payable (Note 9)

   7,418        

Pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations (Note 7)

   971      1,177   

Debt (Note 6)

        12,101   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   104,421      115,503   
    

Debt (Note 6)

   638,043      661,570   

Interest rate derivative liability (Note 14)

   6,533      17,962   

Pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations (Note 7)

   25,374      34,837   

Capital leases and other (Note 16)

   12,299      15,321   

Deferred income tax (Note 8)

   13,171      22,156   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   799,841      867,349   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
    

Shareholders’ equity

    

Common shares $1 par value; 200,000,000 authorized;

    

                                64,502,000 issued and outstanding (2014 - 64,274,000)

   64,424      64,156   

Additional paid-in capital

   329,246      326,951   

Retained earnings

   160,880      100,214   

Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 11)

   (171,574)     (52,441)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   382,976      438,880   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  $1,182,817     $1,306,229   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
    

Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)

    

Subsequent events (Note 2, Note 6(e) and Note 9)

    
   December 31, 
   2018  2017 

ASSETS

   

Current assets

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $240,491  $143,299 

Restricted cash to redeem senior notes (Note 8(a))

      317,439 

Accounts receivable

   252,692   206,027 

Inventories

   303,813   176,601 

Prepaid expenses and other

   13,703   8,973 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   810,699   852,339 
   

Property, plant and equipment, net

   1,029,257   844,848 

Investment in joint ventures (Note 2)

   62,574    

Intangible and other assets

   71,831   26,147 

Deferred income tax

   1,374   1,376 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $    1,975,735  $    1,724,710 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   

Current liabilities

   

Accounts payable and other

  $194,484  $133,557 

Pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations

   904   985 

Senior notes to be redeemed with restricted cash (Note 8(a))

      295,924 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   195,388   430,466 
   

Debt

   1,041,389   662,997 

Pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations

   25,829   21,156 

Capital leases and other

   38,593   27,464 

Deferred income tax

   93,107   31,961 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   1,394,306   1,174,044 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   

Shareholders’ equity

   

Common shares $1 par value; 200,000,000 authorized;

                            65,202,000 issued and outstanding (2017 – 65,017,000)

   65,171   64,974 

Additionalpaid-in capital

   342,438   338,695 

Retained earnings

   301,990   205,998 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (128,170  (59,001
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   581,429   550,666 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

  $1,975,735  $1,724,710 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   

Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)

   

Subsequent events (Notes 8(e), 11 and 17(c))

   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(106)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSCHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data)dollars)

 

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 

Revenues

      

Pulp

  $946,237     $1,073,632     $996,187   

Energy and chemicals

   86,967      101,480      92,198   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   1,033,204      1,175,112      1,088,385   

Costs and expenses

      

Operating costs, excluding depreciation and amortization

   753,523      887,712      920,832   

Operating depreciation and amortization

   67,761      77,675      78,309   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   46,236      47,927      51,169   

Restructuring expenses

             6,415   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

   165,684      161,798      31,660   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
      

Other income (expense)

      

Interest expense

   (53,891)     (67,516)     (69,156)  

Gain on settlement of debt

        3,357        

Foreign exchange gain (loss) on intercompany debt

   (5,306)     (4,777)     904   

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments (Note 14)

   (935)     11,501      19,709   

Other income (expense)

   (601)     (171)     311   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other expense

   (60,733)     (57,606)     (48,232)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

   104,951      104,192      (16,572)  

Income tax benefit (provision) (Note 8)

      

Current

   (11,934)     (5,242)     2,286   

Deferred

   (17,515)     22,016      (11,482)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   75,502      120,966      (25,768)  

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

        (7,812)     (607)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders

  $75,502     $113,154     $(26,375)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
      

Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders (Note 10)

  

  

Basic

  $1.17     $1.82     $(0.47)  

Diluted

  $1.17     $1.81     $(0.47)  
      

Cash dividends declared per common share (Note 9)

  $0.23     $    $  
   Common Shares            
   Number
(thousands of

shares)
  Amount, at Par
Value
  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Total
Equity
 

Balance, December 31, 2015

   64,502   $64,424   $329,246   $160,880   $(171,574)   $382,976  

Shares issued on grants of restricted shares

   38    78   (78         

Shares issued on grants of performance share units

   154    154   (154         

Stock compensation expense

          4,659         4,659 

Net income

             34,943      34,943 

Dividends declared

             (29,755     (29,755

Other comprehensive loss

                (13,695  (13,695
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

   64,694    64,656   333,673   166,068   (185,269  379,128 

Shares issued on grants of restricted shares

   43    38   (38         

Shares issued on grants of performance share units

   280    280   (280         

Stock compensation expense

          2,890         2,890 

Net income

             70,483      70,483 

Dividends declared

             (30,553     (30,553

Settlement of short-swing trade profit claim

          2,450         2,450 

Other comprehensive income

                126,268   126,268 
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

   65,017    64,974   338,695   205,998   (59,001  550,666 

Shares issued on grants of restricted shares

   31    43   (43         

Shares issued on grants of performance share units

   154    154   (154         

Stock compensation expense

          3,940         3,940 

Net income

             128,589      128,589 

Dividends declared

             (32,597     (32,597

Other comprehensive loss

                (69,169  (69,169
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2018

   65,202   $65,171  $342,438  $301,990  $(128,170 $    581,429 
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(107)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)CASH FLOWS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 

Net income (loss)

  $75,502     $120,966     $(25,768)  
      

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes

      

Foreign currency translation adjustment (net of tax effect
of $nil in all years)

   (122,955)     (81,024)     (1,733)  

Change in unrecognized losses and prior service costs related to defined benefit plans (net of tax effect of $nil in all years)

   3,949      (2,873)     4,636   

Change in unrealized gains/losses on marketable securities (net of tax effect of $nil in all years)

   (127)     (14)     (10)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes

   (119,133)     (83,911)     2,893   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

   (43,631)     37,055      (22,875)  

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest

        (7,812)     (607)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common shareholders

  $(43,631)    $29,243     $(23,482)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
   2018  2017  2016 

Cash flows from (used in) operating activities

    

Net income

  $128,589  $70,483  $34,943 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows from operating activities

    

Depreciation and amortization

   96,729   85,294   71,984 

Deferred income tax provision

   16,596   22,056   16,809 

Loss on settlement of debt

   21,515   10,696   454 

Defined benefit pension plans and other post-retirement benefit plan expense

   1,868   2,179   1,955 

Stock compensation expense

   3,940   2,890   4,659 

Other

   3,165   2,497   4,582 

Defined benefit pension plans and other post-retirement benefit plan contributions

   (1,133  (2,031  (2,316

Changes in working capital

    

Accounts receivable

   (10,370  (64,949  9,466 

Inventories

   (58,082  (19,994  6,844 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   37,959   37,170   (10,274

Other

   (4,108  (4,365  1,676 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash from (used in) operating activities

   236,668   141,926   140,782 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    

Cash flows from (used in) investing activities

    

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

   (87,012  (57,915  (42,526

Purchase of intangible assets

   (600  (1,777  (1,844

Acquisitions (Note 2)

   (380,312  (61,627   

Other

   445   (232  67 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash from (used in) investing activities

   (467,479  (121,551  (44,303
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    

Cash flows from (used in) financing activities

    

Redemption of senior notes

   (317,439  (234,945  (23,079

Proceeds from issuance of senior notes

   350,000   550,000    

Proceeds from revolving credit facilities, net

   36,560   22,281    

Dividend payments

   (40,724  (29,866  (29,733

Payment of interest rate derivative liability

      (6,887  (10,883

Payment of debt issuance costs

   (10,074  (11,620   

Other

   (3,462  (212  1,318 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash from (used in) financing activities

   14,861   288,751   (62,377
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

   (4,297  10,716   (2,065
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

   (220,247  319,842   32,037 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year

   460,738   140,896   108,859 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year

  $240,491  $460,738  $140,896 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    

Supplemental cash flow disclosure

    

Cash paid for interest

  $40,278  $45,908  $50,159 

Cash paid for income taxes

  $16,149  $10,866  $13,352 

Supplemental schedule ofnon-cash investing and financing activities

    

Leased production equipment

  $12,145  $145  $17,792 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(108)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)

  Common shares                   
  Number
(thousands of
shares)
  Amount, at
Par Value
  Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Shareholders’
Equity
  Noncontrolling
Interest
(Deficit)
  Total
Equity
 

Balance at December 31, 2012

  55,816    $55,619    $267,718    $37,190    $28,577    $389,104    $(21,342)   $367,762   

Shares issued on grants of restricted shares

  38     77     (77)    -    -    -    -    -  

Stock compensation expense

  -    -    3,574     -    -    3,574     -    3,574   

Net income (loss)

  -    -    -    (26,375)    -    (26,375)    607     (25,768)  

Capital contribution to acquire additional 8.1% of Stendal mill

  -    -    (10,118)    -    -    (10,118)    9,974     (144)  

Other comprehensive income

  -    -    -    -    2,893     2,893     -    2,893   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

  55,854     55,696     261,097     10,815     31,470     359,078     (10,761)    348,317   

Shares issued through public share offering

  8,050     8,050     45,809     -    -    53,859     -    53,859   

Shares issued on grants of restricted shares

  38     78     (78)    -    -    -    -    -  

Shares issued on grants of performance shares

  332     332     (332)    -    -    -    -    -  

Stock compensation expense

  -    -    1,470     -    -    1,470     -    1,470   

Net income

  -    -    -    113,154     -    113,154     7,812     120,966   

Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in the Stendal mill (Note 12)

  -    -    18,985     (23,755)    -    (4,770)    2,949     (1,821)  

Other comprehensive loss

  -    -    -    -    (83,911)    (83,911)    -    (83,911)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance December 31, 2014

  64,274     64,156     326,951     100,214     (52,441)    438,880     -    438,880   

Shares issued on grants of restricted shares

  38     78     (78)    -    -    -    -    -  

Shares issued on grants of performance shares

  160     160     (160)    -    -    -    -    -  

Shares issued on exercise of stock options

  30     30     (30)    -    -    -    -    -  

Stock compensation expense

  -    -    2,563     -    -    2,563     -    2,563   

Net income

  -    -    -    75,502     -    75,502     -    75,502   

Dividends declared

  -    -    -    (14,836)    -    (14,836)    -    (14,836)  

Other comprehensive loss

  -    -    -    -    (119,133)    (119,133)    -    (119,133)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance December 31, 2015

  64,502    $64,424    $329,246    $160,880    $(171,574)   $382,976    $-   $382,976   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars)

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
 ��2015  2014  2013 

Cash flows from (used in) operating activities

   

Net income (loss)

 $75,502    $120,966    $(25,768)  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash flows from operating activities

   

Gain on settlement of debt

      (3,357)      

Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments

  573     (11,501)    (21,494)  

Depreciation and amortization

  68,333     78,012     78,645   

Deferred income taxes

  17,515     (22,016)    11,482   

Foreign exchange (gain) loss on intercompany debt

  5,306     4,777     (904)  

Defined benefit pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plan expense

  2,162     2,475     3,526   

Stock compensation expense

  2,409     1,586     3,574   

Other

  2,756     2,076     4,073   

Defined benefit pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plan contributions

  (2,349)    (2,951)    (2,878)  

Changes in working capital

   

Accounts receivable

  (11,256)    (25,113)    13,993   

Inventories

  (13,235)    6,445     (14,563)  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  9,665     (5,382)    (11,569)  

Other

  1,839     (1,429)    (1,792)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash from (used in) operating activities

  159,220     144,588     36,325   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   

Cash flows from (used in) investing activities

   

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

  (46,536)    (34,612)    (45,707)  

Purchase of intangible assets

  (3,809)    (4,776)      

Restricted cash

      (10,627)      

Other

  528     910     739   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash from (used in) investing activities

  (49,817)    (49,105)    (44,968)  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   

Cash flows from (used in) financing activities

   

Repayment of debt and repurchase of notes

  (10,763)    (891,019)    (56,416)  

Proceeds from issuance of notes and borrowings of debt

      650,000     74,472   

Proceeds from issuance of shares

      53,859       

Dividend payment

  (7,418)          

Proceeds from (repayment of) revolving credit facilities, net

  (23,058)    26,254     (5,640)  

Payment of interest rate derivative liability

  (13,530)          

Repayment of capital lease obligations

  (2,412)    (2,465)    (2,593)  

Proceeds from sale and lease-back transactions

  466     1,533       

Payment of note issuance costs

  (326)    (20,169)    (3,855)  

Proceeds from government grants

  158     6,699     9,265   

Other

  219     (444)      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash from (used in) financing activities

  (56,664)    (175,752)    15,233   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  (6,282)    (14,287)    3,699   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

  46,457     (94,556)    10,289   

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

  53,172     147,728     137,439   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 $99,629    $53,172    $147,728   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)

(In thousands of U.S. dollars)

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

   

Cash paid during the year for

   

Interest

 $51,975    $65,013    $65,747   

Income taxes

 $8,784    $3,718    $7,307   
   

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities

   

Payment-in-kind note issued to acquire noncontrolling interest

 $-   $12,101   $-  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Background

Mercer International Inc. (“Mercer Inc.”) is a Washington corporation and its shares of common stock are quoted and listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global MarketMarket.

Since acquiring Mercer Peace River Pulp Ltd. (formally called Daishowa-Marubeni International Ltd.) (“MPR”) in December 2018 it now owns and the Toronto Stock Exchange.

Mercer Inc. operates threefour pulp manufacturing facilities, onetwo in Canada and two in Germany, has a 50% joint venture interest in an NBSK pulp mill in Canada and isowns one of the largest producers of market northern bleached softwood kraft (“NBSK”) pulpsawmill that also has a biomass power plant in the world.Germany.

In these consolidated financial statements, unless otherwise indicated, all amounts are expressed in United StatesU.S. dollars (“U.S. dollars” or “$$”). The symbol “€” refers to euros and the symbol “C$” refers to Canadian dollars.

Basis of Presentation

These consolidated financial statements contained herein include the accounts of Mercer Inc. and all of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaU.S. (“GAAP”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

The Company owns 100% of the economic interest in its subsidiaries with the exception of the 50% joint venture interest in an NBSK pulp mill with West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd, which is accounted for using the equity method.

Use of Estimates

Preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant management judgment is required in determining the accounting for, among other things, pensionspension and other post-retirement benefit obligations, deferred income taxes (valuation allowance and permanent reinvestment), depreciation and amortization, future cash flows associated with impairment testing for long-lived assets, the allocation of the purchase price in a business combination to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, legal liabilities and contingencies. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates, and changes in these estimates are recorded when known.

Significant Accounting Policies

Cash, and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash and cash equivalents include cash held in bank accounts and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Restricted cash is comprised of cash deposits that are designated for the settlement of debt or which cannot be withdrawn without prior notice or penalty.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are recorded at cost, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company reviews the collectability of receivablesaccounts receivable at each reporting date. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful

(109)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

accounts at an amount estimated to cover the potential losses on certain uninsured receivables.accounts receivable. Any amounts that are determined to be uncollectible and uninsured are offset against the allowance. The allowance is based on the Company’s evaluation of numerous factors, including the payment history and financial position of the debtors. For certain customers the Company receives a letter of credit prior to shipping its product.

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Inventories

Inventories of raw materials, finished goods and work in progress are valued at the lower of cost, using the weighted-average cost method, or net realizable value. OtherSpare parts and other materials and spare parts are valued at the lower of cost and replacement cost. Cost includes labor, materials and production overhead and is determined by using the weighted average cost method. Raw materials inventories include both roundwood (logs)pulp logs, sawlogs and wood chips. These inventories are located both at the pulp mills and at various offsite locations. In accordance with industry practice, physical inventory counts utilize standardized techniques to estimate quantities of roundwoodpulp logs, sawlogs and wood chip inventory volumes. These techniques historically have provided reasonable estimates of such inventories.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of buildings and production equipment is based on the estimated useful lives of the assets and is computed using the straight-line method. Buildings are depreciated over 10 to 50 years and production equipment and other primarily over 25 years.

The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. To determine recoverability, the Company compares the carrying value of the assets to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets held for use is based on the fair value of the asset.

The costs of major rebuilds, replacements and those expenditures that substantially increase the useful lives of existing property, plant, and equipment are capitalized, as well as interest costs associated with major capital projects until ready for their intended use. The cost of repairs and maintenance as well as planned shutdown maintenance performed on manufacturing facilities, composed of labor, materials and other incremental costs, is recognized as an expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as incurred.

Leases which transfer to the Company substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item are capitalized at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Capital leases are depreciated over the lease term. Operating lease payments are recognized as an expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The Company provides for asset retirement obligations when there is a legislated or contractual basis for those obligations. An obligation is recorded as a liability at fair value in the period in which the Company incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of an asset. The associated costs are capitalized as part of the carrying value of the related asset and amortized over its remaining useful life. The liability is accreted using a credit adjusted risk-free interest rate.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, consisting of property, plant and equipment and finite-life intangibles, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. To determine recoverability, the Company compares the carrying value of the assets to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets held for use is based on the fair value of the asset.

(110)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Government Grants

The Company records investment grants from federal and state governments when the conditions of their receipt are complied with and there is reasonable assurance that the grants will be received. Grants related to assets are government grants whose primary condition is that the company qualifying for them should purchase, construct or otherwise acquire long-term assets. Secondary conditions may also be attached, including restricting the type or location of the assets and/or other conditions that must be met. Grants related to assets are deducted from the asset costscost of the assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Grants related to income are government grants which are either unconditional, related to reduced environmental emissions or related to the Company’s normal business operations, and are reported as a reduction of related expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations when the conditions of their receipt are complied with and there is reasonable assurance that the grants will be received.

The Company is required to pay certain fees based on water consumption levelswastewater emissions at its German mills. Accrued fees can be reduced upon the mills’ demonstration of reduced wastewater emissions. The fees are expensed as incurred and the fee reduction is recognized once the Company has reasonable assurance that the German regulators will accept the reduced level of wastewater emissions. There may be a significant period of time between recognition of the wastewater expense and recognition of the wastewater fee reduction.

PensionsAmortizable Intangible Assets

Amortizable intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The amortization periods have been provided in the Intangible and Other Assets Note.

Sandalwood Tree Plantations

Sandalwood tree plantations are measured at the lower of cost which includes both direct and indirect costs of growing and harvesting the sandalwood trees and net realizable value. The cost of the sandalwood plantations is recorded in intangible assets and other and the cost of the harvested sandalwood is recorded in inventory in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Pension Plans

The Company maintains a defined benefit pension planplans for its MPR employees and its salaried employees at its Celgar mill which isare funded andnon-contributory. The cost of the benefits earned by the salaried employees is determined using the projected benefit method prorated on services. The pension expense reflects the current service cost, the interest on the unfunded liability and the amortization over the estimated average remaining service life of the employees of (i) prior service costs, and (ii) the net actuarial gain or loss that exceeds 10% of the greater of the accrued benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets as ofat the beginning of the year. The Company recognizes the net funded status of the plan.

In addition, hourly-paid employees at the Celgar mill are covered by a multiemployer pension plan for which contributions are charged against earnings in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

(111)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Foreign Operations and Currency Translation

The Company determines its foreign subsidiaries’ functional currency by reviewing the currency of the primary economic environment in which the foreign subsidiaries operate, which is normally the currency of the environment in which the foreign subsidiaries generate and expend cash. The Company translates assets and liabilities of itsnon-U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using the rate in effect at the balance sheet date and revenues and expenses are translated at the average rate of exchange throughout the period. Foreign currency translation gains and losses are recognized within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)loss in shareholders’ equity.

Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the respective functional currencies of each operation using exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are translated to the functional currency using the exchange rate at that date.Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to the functional currency using historical exchange rates. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions related to operating activities are included in costs and expenses while those related tonon-operating activities are included in other income (expenses) in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Where intercompany loans are of a long-term investment nature, the after-tax effect of exchange rate changes are included as an unrealizeda foreign currency translation adjustment within accumulated other comprehensive incomeloss in shareholders’ equity.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when obligations under the terms of a contract with its customer are satisfied; generally this occurs with the transfer of control of the products sold. Transfer of control to the customer is based on the standardized shipping terms in the contract as this determines when the Company has the right to payment, the customer has legal title to the asset and the customer has the risks of ownership. Payment terms are defined in the contract and payment is typically due within three months after control has transferred to the customer. The contracts do not have a significant financing component.

The Company has elected to exclude value added, sales and other taxes it collects concurrent with revenue-producing activities from revenues.

The Company may arrange shipping and handling activities as part of the sale of its products. The Company has elected to account for shipping and handling activities that occur after the customer has obtained control of the product as a fulfillment cost rather than as an additional promised service.

The following is a description of the principal activities from which the Company generates its revenues. For a breakdown of revenues by product and geographic location see the Business Segment Information Note.

Pulp and Lumber Revenues

For European sales sent by truck or train from the mills directly to the customer, the contracted sales terms are such that control transfers once the truck or train leaves the mill. For orders sent by ocean freighter, the contract terms state that control transfers at the time the product passes the ships rail. For North American sales shipped by truck or train, the contracts state that control transfers once the truck or train has arrived at the customer’s specified location.

(112)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Revenue RecognitionThe transaction price is included in the sales contract and is net of customer discounts, rebates and other selling concessions.

The Company recognizes revenue fromCompany’s pulp sales are to tissue and chemicalpaper producers and the Company’s lumber sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,are to manufacturers and retailers. The Company’s sales to Europe and North America are direct to the customer. The Company’s pulp sales price is fixed or determinable, title of ownershipto overseas customers are primarily through third party sales agents and risk of loss have passedthe Company’s lumber sales to overseas customers are either direct to the customer or through third party sales agents.

By-Product Revenues

Energy sales are to utility companies in Canada and collectability is reasonably assured.Germany. Sales are reported net of discounts and allowances.

The Company reports revenue from sales of surplus electricity and the sale of chemicals as “energy and chemicals” revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Energy revenuesenergy are recognized as the electricity is consumed by customersthe customer and when collection is reasonably assured. These revenues include an estimate of the value of electricity transferred to customers in the period but billed subsequent to period-end. Customer bills are based on agreed uponcontractual usage rates and meter readings that indicatemeasure electricity consumption.

Chemicals and wood residuals from our German mills are sold into the European market direct to the customer and have shipping terms where control transfers once the chemicals or wood residuals are loaded onto the truck at the mill.

Shipping and Handling Costs

Amounts charged to customers for shipping and handling costs are recognized as revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Shipping and handling costs incurred by the Company are included in operating costscost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense over an award’s requisite service period based on the award’s fair value in selling, general, and administrative expenses withinin the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company issues new shares upon the exercise of stock-based compensation awards.

For performance share units (“PSUs”) which have the same grant and service inception date, the fair value is based upon the targeted number of shares to be awarded and the quoted market price of the Company’s shares at that date. For PSUs where the service inception date precedes the grant date, the fair value is based upon the targeted number of shares awarded and the quoted price of the Company’s shares at each reporting date up to the grant date. The target number of shares is determined using management’s best estimate. The final determination of the number of shares to be granted is made by the Company’s Boardboard of Directors.directors. The Company estimates forfeitures of PSUs based on management’s expectations and recognizes compensation cost only for those awards expected to vest. Estimated forfeitures are adjusted to actual experience at each balance sheet date.

The fair value of restricted shares is determined based upon the number of shares granted and the quoted price of the Company’s shares on the date of grant.

Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are recognized using the asset and liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial

(113)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases,basis, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Valuation allowances are provided if, after considering both positive and negative available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Deferred income taxes are determined separately for eachtax-paying component of the Company. For eachtax-paying component, all deferred tax liabilities and assets are offset and presented as a single net amount.

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company occasionally enters into derivative financial instruments including interest rate swaps and pulp price swaps to limit exposures to changes in interest rates and pulp prices.manage certain market risks. These derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments and accordingly, are recorded at fair value onin the Consolidated Balance Sheet with the changes in fair value recognized in gain (loss) on derivative instrumentsother income (expenses) in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Periodically, the Company enters into derivative contracts to supply materials for its own use and as such are exempt frommark-to-market accounting.

Fair Value Measurements

The fair value methodologies and, as a result, the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments are determined based on the fair value hierarchy provided in the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification, and are as follows:

Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2 – Valuations based on observable inputs in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted commodity prices or interest or currency exchange rates.

Level 3 – Valuations based on significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, such as discounted cash flow methodologies based on internal cash flow forecasts.

The financial instrument’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share Attributable to Common ShareholdersShare

Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders (“EPS”)share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding in the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholdersshare is calculated to give effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding by applying the “Treasury Stock” and “If-Converted”“If-Converted” methods. Outstanding stock options, restricted shares, performance shares and PSUs represent the onlyInstruments that could have a potentially dilutive effectseffect on the Company’s weighted average shares.

New Accounting Pronouncementsshares outstanding include all or a portion of outstanding stock options, restricted shares, restricted share units, performance shares and PSUs.

Accounting Pronouncements ImplementedBusiness Combinations

In April 2015,The Company uses the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”) which requires debt issuance costs to be presentedacquisition method in the balance sheet asaccounting for a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt, consistent with the presentation of a debt discount. Amortization of debt issuance costs shall continue to be reported as interest expense over the term of the related debt instrument. This standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015business combination. Under this approach, identifiable assets acquired and should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. Early application is permitted for all entitiesliabilities assumed are recorded at their respective fair market values at the beginningdate of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company has elected to early adopt ASU 2015-03 and as at December 31, 2015 $11,957 (2014 – $13,842)

acquisition. In developing estimates of fair market values for long-lived assets, including identifiable

(114)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

has been reclassified from intangible assets, the Company utilizes a variety of inputs including forecasted cash flows, discount rates, estimated replacement costs and other assetsdepreciation and obsolescence factors. Valuations are performed by management or independent valuation specialists under management’s supervision, where appropriate. Acquisition costs, as well as costs to long-term debt onintegrate acquired companies, are expensed as incurred in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company has not reclassified commitment fees related to revolving credit facilities due to their variable outstanding balances, and will continue to amortize these fees to interest expense over the termStatement of the related revolving credit facility.Operations.

In November 2015, the FinancialNew Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (“ASU 2015-17”) which requires deferred tax liabilities and assets to be presented as long-term in the balance sheet. This standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assets or retrospectively to all periods presented. Early application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company has elected to early adopt ASU 2015-17 and as at December 31, 2015 $19,473 (2014 – $19,968) has been reclassified from current deferred income tax assets with $12,595 (2014 – $13,232) being reclassified to long-term deferred income tax assets and $6,878 (2014 – $6,736) being reclassified to long-term deferred income tax liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.Pronouncements

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards BoardFASB issued Accounting Standards Update2014-09 (“ASU2014-09”), Revenue Recognition – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”) that requires companies to recognize revenue when a customer obtains control rather than when companies have transferred substantially all risks and rewards of a good or service. Additionally, the update provides presentation and disclosure requirements which are more detailed in regards to the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The Company adopted ASU2014-09 as at January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. This update does not change the amount or timing of when the Company recognizes revenue as the majority of the Company’s revenue arises from contracts with customers in which the sale of goods is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017the main performance obligation. The Company’s revised revenue recognition disclosure has been included in the Significant Accounting Policies and interim periods therein and requires expanded disclosures. The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements.Business Segment Information Note.

In July 2015,March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards BoardFASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-11, Simplifying2017-07 (“ASU2017-07”), Improving the MeasurementPresentation of Inventory (“ASU 2015-11”)Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-Retirement Benefit Cost which requires that inventory withinan employer report the scopeservice cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of this update, including inventory statednet benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations. The Company adopted ASU2017-07 as at averageJanuary 1, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2018, $1,132 of the net benefit cost be measured athas been recorded in other income (expenses) in the lowerConsolidated Statement of Operations. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $1,500 and $1,381, respectively, has been reclassified from cost of sales, excluding depreciation and net realizable value.amortization to other income (expenses) in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

In January 2018, the FASB released guidance on the accounting for tax on the global intangiblelow-taxed income (“GILTI”) provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”). The GILTI provisions impose a tax on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. The Company has elected to treat the GILTI inclusions as a period cost.

In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update2018-14 (“ASU2018-14”), Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General which both modifies and clarifies certain disclosure requirements for defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans. This update is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company elected to early adopt ASU2018-14 and the revised disclosure has been included in the Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Obligations Note.

(115)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update2016-02, Leases (“ASU2016-02”) which requires lessees to recognize virtually all of their leases on the balance sheet, by recording aright-of-use asset (“ROU assets”) and corresponding liability. In July 2018 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases as well as Accounting Standards Update2018-11, Leases: Targeted Improvements which further affect the guidance of ASU2016-02. These updates are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted as ofat the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company will adopt these updates on January 1, 2019 using the available practical expedients. The standard will have a material impact on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, but is not expected to impact the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The most significant impact will be the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities for operating leases while the accounting for capital leases will remain substantially unchanged. Adoption of the standard will result in recognition of additional ROU assets and lease liabilities for operating leases of approximately $14,700.

In February 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Act. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Act is recognized. The adoption of this accounting guidanceupdate will not materiallyhave an impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation - Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting which both clarifies and modifies accounting requirements relating to nonemployee share based payment transactions. The adoption of this update will not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update2018-13, Fair Value Measurement which both modifies and clarifies the disclosure requirements for fair value measurement. This update is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this update will not have an impact on the current disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.

Note 2. Acquisitions

MPR

On December 10, 2018, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of MPR for consideration of $344,588 cash, subject to certain customary working capital adjustments. The acquisition results in 100% ownership of a bleached kraft pulp mill in Peace River, Alberta, a 50% joint venture interest in an NBSK pulp mill in Quesnel, British Columbia, and a 50% interest in a logging and chipping operation for the areas underlying MPR’s forest management agreements and timber allocations. The acquisition of MPR expands the Company’s presence in Asia and adds northern bleached hardwood kraft to its product mix.

(116)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Acquisitions (continued)

The following summarizes the Company’s preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from MPR at the acquisition date:

   Purchase Price
Allocation
 

Current assets

  $135,305 

Property, plant and equipment

   207,743 

Investment in joint ventures

   62,672 

Amortizable intangible assets, timber cutting rights (a)

   34,810 

Other long-term assets

   392 
  

 

 

 

Total assets acquired

   440,922 

Current liabilities

   35,578 

Pension obligations

   9,747 

Deferred income tax

   47,912 

Other long-term liabilities

   3,097 
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities assumed

   96,334 
  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

  $        344,588 
  

 

 

 
(a)

The timber cutting rights are being amortized on a straight line basis over 30 years. The fair value of the timber cutting rights was determined through the market approach utilizing comparable market data. The values were then discounted at a rate of 12.5% for 30 years to arrive at the fair value.

The purchase price allocation was based on a preliminary valuation and may be revised as a result of additional information obtained regarding the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and revisions of provisional estimates of fair value, including, but not limited to, the completion of valuations related to property, plant, and equipment and the identification of intangible assets. The purchase price allocation will be finalized during the12-month measurement period following the acquisition date.

MPR is a business under GAAP, accordingly the Company began consolidating its results of operations, financial position.position and cash flows in the consolidated financial statements as of the acquisition date. The amount of MPR’s revenues and net loss included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $29,907 and $978, respectively. In the year ended December 31, 2018, $1,871 of acquisition related costs were recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company also incurred an acquisition commitment fee of $5,250 for a senior unsecured bridge facility to ensure financing was in place for the acquisition. However, the bridge facility was not used as the Company issued the senior notes due 2025.

The following unaudited pro forma information represents the Company’s results of operations as if the acquisition of MPR had occurred on January 1, 2017. This pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results that would have occurred for the periods presented or that may be expected in the future.

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
           2018                   2017         

Revenues

  $1,906,697   $1,503,446 

Net income

  $189,431   $42,267 

(117)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 2. Acquisitions (continued)

The unaudited pro forma information includes additional interest expense related to debt issued to finance the acquisition of $25,190 and $26,989 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively and additional depreciation expense of $11,679 and $9,776 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Other adjustments also include those related to increasing the December 31, 2018 net income and decreasing the December 31, 2017 net income by thenon-recurring acquisition commitment fee of $5,250 and acquisition costs of $1,871.

MPR undertakes related party transactions in the normal course of business with the 50% owned NBSK pulp mill with whom $6,044 has been incurred primarily for the purchase of pulp. MPR also transacts with the 50% owned logging operation and as of December 31, 2018, had a balance of $2,343 owing to the logging operation related to the purchase of chips and logs.

Santanol

On October 18, 2018, the Company acquired Santanol for $35,724 cash. Santanol owns and leases existing Indian sandalwood plantations and a processing extraction plant in Australia. The acquisition presents the opportunity to expand the Company’s operations to include plantation harvesting as well as production and marketing of solid wood chemical extractives.

The following summarizes the Company’s allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from Santanol at the acquisition date:

   Purchase Price
Allocation
 

Net working capital

  $5,111 

Property, plant and equipment

   18,490 

Sandalwood tree plantations (a)

   12,123 
  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

  $                35,724 
  

 

 

 
(a)

The fair value of the sandalwood tree plantations was determined using the discounted cash flows method using a rate of 10.5%.

Santanol is a business under GAAP, accordingly the Company began consolidating its results of operations, financial position and cash flows in the consolidated financial statements as of the acquisition date. The amount of Santanol’s revenues and net loss included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $478 and $907, respectively. In the year ended December 31, 2018, $777 of acquisition related costs were recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Pro forma information related to acquisition of Santanol has not been included as it does not have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(118)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 2.3. Accounts Receivable

 

  December 31, 
  2015   2014 

Sale of pulp, energy and chemicals, net of allowance of $15 (2014 – $29)

 $119,359    $133,586  

Other non-trade receivables

  14,895     7,502  
 

 

 

   

 

 

 
 $            134,254    $        141,088  
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Included within other non-trade receivables is approximately C$8.5 million ($6,109) related to a settlement with a utility provider in connection to a fee structure dispute. The settlement was approved by a governing utilities regulatory agency in December 2015 and payment was received in January 2016.

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

   December 31, 
   2018   2017 

Trade, net of allowance of $nil (2017 – $18)

  $230,426   $186,008 

Other

   22,266    20,019 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $            252,692   $            206,027 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note 3.4. Inventories

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
  2015   2014   2018   2017 

Raw materials

  $57,592    $52,877    $103,983   $49,137 

Finished goods

   36,829     45,090     114,304    58,364 

Spare parts and other

   46,580     48,609     85,526    69,100 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
  $141,001    $146,576    $            303,813   $            176,601 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Note 4.5. Property, Plant and Equipment

 

  December 31,   Estimated Useful
Lives (Years)
   December 31, 
  2015   2014   2018 2017 

Land

  $27,625    $30,803      $54,832  $44,834 

Buildings

   154,047     172,626     10 - 50    251,408  187,738 

Production and other equipment

   1,299,076     1,422,828     25    1,698,132  1,556,242 
    

 

  

 

 
  

 

   

 

      2,004,372  1,788,814 
   1,480,748     1,626,257  

Less: accumulated depreciation

   (718,357)     (743,107)       (975,115 (943,966
  

 

   

 

 
  $762,391    $883,150      

 

  

 

 
  

 

   

 

     $    1,029,257  $       844,848 
    

 

  

 

 

As at December 31, 2015,2018, property, plant and equipment was net of $253,178$211,532 of unamortized government investment grants (2014(2017$305,045)$243,164). As at December 31, 2015,2018, included in production and other equipment is equipment under capital leases which had gross amounts of $16,233 (2014$44,756 (2017$20,325)$35,648), and accumulated depreciation of $8,395 (2014$15,963 (2017$6,218)$13,954). During the year ended December 31, 2018, production and other equipment totalling $70totaling $12,145 was acquired under capital lease obligations (2014(2017$2,960; 2013$145; 2016$2,112)$17,792).

The Company maintains industrial landfills on its premises for the disposal of waste, primarily from the mills’ pulp processing activities. The mills have obligations under their landfill permits to decommission these disposal facilities pursuant to certain regulations. As at December 31, 2015,2018, the Company had recorded $4,620 (2014$8,752 (2017$4,798)$5,278) of asset retirement obligations in capital leases and other in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(119)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 6. Intangible and Other Assets

Intangible assets as at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, were comprised of the following:

   Estimated Useful
Lives (Years)
  December 31, 
   2018  2017 

Energy sales agreement

  11  $17,234  $18,052 

Timber cutting rights

  30   34,139    

Software and other intangible assets

  5   23,731   23,635 
    

 

 

  

 

 

 
     75,104   41,687 

Less: accumulated amortization

     (21,177  (17,115
    

 

 

  

 

 

 
    $      53,927  $      24,572 
    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other assets of $17,904 (2017 – $1,575) primarily relate to sandalwood tree plantations.

Note 5.7. Accounts Payable and Other

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
  2015   2014   2018   2017 

Trade payables

  $20,637    $22,729    $36,333   $36,151 

Accrued expenses

   55,648     52,968     95,936    67,528 

Interest rate derivative liability, current portion (Note 14)

   10,380     14,832  

Interest payable

   16,861    10,093 

Income tax payable

   29,818    4,324 

Legal cost award payable (Note 17(c))

   6,951     

Dividends payable

       8,126 

Other

   9,367     11,696     8,585    7,335 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
  $96,032    $102,225    $          194,484    $          133,557 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Note 8. Debt

   December 31, 
   2018   2017 

2022 Senior Notes, principal amount, $100,000 (a)

  $98,918   $394,565 

2024 Senior Notes, principal amount, $250,000 (a)

   246,154    245,398 

2025 Senior Notes, principal amount, $350,000 (a)

   342,761     

2026 Senior Notes, principal amount, $300,000 (a)

   294,588    293,773 

Credit facilities

    

€200 million joint revolving credit facility (b)

   58,968     

C$40 million revolving credit facility (c)

        

€70 million revolving credit facility

       25,185 

€2.6 million demand loan (d)

        
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $        1,041,389   $          958,921 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(120)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 6.8. Debt

Debt consists of the following: (continued)

 

   December 31, 
   2015   2014 

2019 Senior Notes, unsecured, $250,000 face value (a)

  $245,689    $244,711  

2022 Senior Notes, unsecured, $400,000 face value (a)

   392,354     391,447  

Payment-in-kind note (b)

   -     12,101  

Revolving credit facilities

    

€75.0 million (c)

   -     25,412  

C$40.0 million (d)

   -     -  

€25.0 million (e)

   -     -  

€5.0 million (f)

   -     -  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   638,043     673,671  

Less: current portion

   -     (12,101)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Debt, less current portion

  $638,043    $661,570  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

As at December 31, 2015,2018, the maturities of the principal portion of debt are as follows:

 

Matures  Amount 

2016

  $-  

2017

   -  

2018

   -  

2019

   250,000  

2020

   -  

Thereafter

   400,000  
  

 

 

 
  $650,000  
  

 

 

 

2019

  $—  

2020

   —  

2021

   —  

2022

   100,000  

2023

   58,968  

Thereafter

   900,000  
  

 

 

 
  $        1,058,968  
  

 

 

 

Certain of the Company’s debt instruments were issued under agreements which, among other things, may limit its ability and the ability of its subsidiaries to make certain payments, including dividends. These limitations are subject to specific exceptions. As at December 31, 2015,2018, the Company is in compliance with the terms of its debt agreements.

 

(a)

On November 26, 2014,December 7, 2018, the Company issued $650,000 of senior notes consisting of $250,000$350,000 in aggregate principal amount of 7.00%7.375% senior notes which mature on December 1, 2019January 15, 2025 (“20192025 Senior Notes”) and $400,000 in aggregate principal amount of 7.75% senior notes which mature on December 1, 2022 (“2022 Senior Notes” and collectively with the 2019 Senior Notes, the “Senior Notes”). The 2025 Senior Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their principal amount. Upon their issuanceThe net proceeds of the Senior Notesofferings were recorded at $635,949 which included debt issuance costs$342,682 after deducting the underwriter’s discount and offering expenses. The net proceeds, together with cash on hand, were used to finance the acquisition of $14,051. These costs were proportionally allocated to the 2019 Senior Notes and the 2022 Senior Notes.MPR.

On December 20, 2017, the Company issued $300,000 in aggregate principal amount of 5.50% senior notes which mature on January 15, 2026 (“2026 Senior Notes”). The 2026 Senior Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their principal amount. The net proceeds of the offering were $293,795, after deducting the underwriter’s discount and offering expenses.

In January 2018, the Company used the net proceeds of the 2026 Senior Notes, together with cash on hand, to purchase $300,000 in aggregate principal amount of 2022 Senior Notes (herein defined below). In connection with this redemption the Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of $21,515 in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As at December 31, 2017, the total cash used to redeem the 2022 Senior Notes was classified as restricted cash and the carrying value of the 2022 Senior Notes was classified as a current liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

On February 3, 2017, the Company issued $225,000 in aggregate principal amount of 6.50% senior notes which mature on February 1, 2024 (“2024 Senior Notes”) and on March 16, 2017, the Company issued an additional $25,000 in aggregate principal amount of its 2024 Senior Notes. The 2024 Senior Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their principal amount. The net proceeds of the offerings were $244,711, after deducting the underwriter’s discount and offering expenses. The net proceeds from the 2024 Senior Notes, together with cash on hand, were used to redeem $227,000 of remaining aggregate principal amount of outstanding senior notes due 2019, to finance the acquisition of the Friesau mill, a sawmill and biomass power plant near Friesau, Germany and for general working capital purposes. In connection with the redemption the Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of $10,696 in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

On November 26, 2014, the Company issued $400,000 in aggregate principal amount of 7.75% senior notes which mature on December 1, 2022 (“2022 Senior Notes” and collectively with the 2024 Senior Notes, 2025 Senior Notes and 2026 Senior Notes, the “Senior Notes”).

(121)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 6.8. Debt (continued)

 

The Senior Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of the Company. They rank equal in right of payment with all existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness of the Company and are senior in right of payment to any current or future subordinated indebtedness of the Company. The Senior Notes are effectively junior in right of payment to all existing and future secured indebtedness, to the extent of the assets securing such indebtedness, and all indebtedness and liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries.

The Company may redeem all or a part of the 2025 Senior Notes or 2026 Senior Notes, upon not less than 10 days’ or more than 60 days’ notice and the Company may redeem all or a part of the 2024 Senior Notes or 2022 Senior Notes, upon not less than 30 days’ or more than 60 days’ notice at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) discussed below,price plus accrued and unpaid interest to (but not including) the applicable redemption date.

The 2019 Senior Notesfollowing table presents the redemption prices are equal to 103.50% for(expressed as percentages of principal amount) and the twelve month period beginning on December 1, 2016, 101.75% for the twelve month period beginning on December 1, 2017, and 100.00% beginning on December 1, 2018 and at any time thereafter. The 2022 Senior Notes redemption prices are equal to 105.813% for the twelve month period beginning on December 1, 2017, 103.875% for the twelve month period beginning on December 1, 2018, 101.938% for the twelve month period beginning on December 1, 2019, and 100.00% beginning on December 1, 2020 and at any time thereafter.periods:

2022 Senior Notes

  

2024 Senior Notes

  

2025 Senior Notes

  

2026 Senior Notes

 

12 Month
Period

Beginning

 Percentage  

12 Month
Period
Beginning

 Percentage  

12 Month
Period
Beginning

 Percentage  

12 Month
Period
Beginning

 Percentage 

December 1, 2018

  103.875 February 1, 2020  103.250 January 15, 2021  103.688 January 15, 2021  102.750

December 1, 2019

  101.938 February 1, 2021  101.625 January 15, 2022  101.844 January 15, 2022  101.375

December 1, 2020 and thereafter

  100.000 

February 1, 2022

and thereafter

  100.000 January 15, 2023 and thereafter  100.000 January 15, 2023 and thereafter  100.000

 

(b)

A €10.0€200.0 million payment-in-kind note due to the former noncontrolling shareholder of the Stendal mill which the Company redeemed on April 20, 2015 for a cash payment of €10.0 million ($10,763).

(c)

A €75.0 millionjoint revolving credit facility atwith all of the Stendal millCompany’s German mills that matures in October 2019.December 2023. Borrowings under the facility are collateralized by the mill’s inventory and accounts receivableunsecured and bear interest at Euribor plus 3.50%.a variable margin ranging from 1.05% to 2.00% dependent on conditions including but not limited to a prescribed leverage ratio. As at December 31, 2015,2018, approximately €75.0€51.5 million ($81,443)58,968) of this facility was drawn and accruing interest at a rate of 1.05% and approximately €11.9 million ($13,582) of this facility was supporting bank guarantees leaving approximately €136.6 million ($156,450) available.

 

(d)(c)

A C$40.0 million revolving credit facility at the Celgar mill that matures in May 2019.July 2023. Borrowings under the facility are collateralized by the mill’s inventory, and accounts receivable, general intangibles and capital assets and are restricted by a borrowing base calculated on the mill’s inventory and accounts receivable. When the borrowing capacity is less than 25% of the total facility the Canadian dollar denominated amounts bear interest at bankers acceptance plus 1.50% or Canadian prime.prime and the U.S. dollar denominated amounts bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.50% or U.S. base. When the borrowing capacity is greater than or equal to 25% of the total facility, the respective bankers acceptance or LIBOR margins are reduced by 0.25% and the Canadian Prime or U.S. base margins are reduced by 0.125%. As at December 31, 2015,2018, approximately C$1.7 million ($1,228)1,245) was supporting letters of credit and approximately C$38.3 million ($27,674)28,076) was available.

 

(e)(d)

A €25.0€2.6 million revolving credit facilitydemand loan at the Rosenthal mill that matures in October 2016. Borrowings under the facility are collateralized by the mill’s inventory and accounts receivable and bear interest at Euribor plus 3.50%. As at December 31, 2015, approximately €3.1 million ($3,324) of this facility was supporting bank guarantees leaving approximately €21.9 million ($23,823) available.

In February 2016, the Company amended the facility, including extending its maturity date to October 2019 and reducing the applicable margin on borrowings from 3.50% to 2.95%.

(f)

A €5.0 million revolving credit facility at the Rosenthal mill that matures in December 2018.does not have a maturity date. Borrowings under this facility are unsecured and bear interest at the rate of the three-month Euribor plus 2.50% and are secured by certain land at the Rosenthal mill.. As at December 31, 20152018, approximately €1.3€2.6 million ($1,358)2,922) of this facility was supporting bank guarantees leaving approximately €3.7 million ($4,071)$nil available.

(e)

In 2019, MPR entered into a C$60.0 million revolving credit facility that matures in February 2024. The facility is available by way of: (i) Canadian denominated advances, which bear interest at a designated

(122)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 8. Debt (continued)

prime rate per annum; (ii) banker’s acceptance equivalent loans, which bear interest at the applicable Canadian dollar banker’s acceptance plus 1.25% to 1.50% per annum; (iii) dollar denominated base rate advances at the greater of the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, a designated LIBOR rate plus 1.00% and the bank’s applicable reference rate for U.S. dollar loans; and (iv) dollar LIBOR advances, which bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.25% to 1.50% per annum. The facility is secured by, among other things, the mill’s inventories and receivables.

Note 7.9. Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Obligations

Defined Benefit Plans

Included in pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations are amounts related to the Company’s Celgar and Rosenthal mills. The largest componentfrom the date of these obligations is with respect to the Celgar mill which maintains a defined benefit pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plans for certain employees (the “Celgar Defined Benefit Plans”).acquisition MPR.

Pension benefits are based on employees’ earnings and years of service. The Celgar Defined Benefit Plansdefined benefit plans are funded by contributions from the Company based on actuarial estimates and statutory requirements.

Information about the Celgar Defined Benefit Plans,defined benefit plans, in aggregate for the year ended December 31, 2015 is2018 were as follows:

 

  2015   2018 
      Pension       Other Post-
  Retirement  
Benefits
           Total       Pension Other Post-
Retirement
Benefits
 Total 

Change in benefit obligation

          

Benefit obligation, December 31, 2014

  $    43,073     $    28,465     $    71,538   

Benefit obligation, December 31, 2017

  $38,330  $20,788  $59,118 

Benefit obligation transferred, MPR

   62,545     62,545 

Service cost

   121      798      919      269  467  736 

Interest cost

   1,427      984      2,411      1,409  709  2,118 

Benefit payments

   (2,345)     (587)     (2,932)     (2,346 (594 (2,940

Actuarial gains

   (1,021)     (3,988)     (5,009)  

Actuarial losses (gains)

   456  (5,065 (4,609

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   (6,829)     (4,394)     (11,223)     (4,667 (1,446 (6,113
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Benefit obligation, December 31, 2015

   34,426      21,278      55,704   

Benefit obligation, December 31, 2018

   95,996  14,859  110,855 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
      

Reconciliation of fair value of plan assets

          

Fair value of plan assets, December 31, 2014

   35,653           35,653   

Fair value of plan assets, December 31, 2017

   37,057     37,057 

Fair value of plan assets transferred, MPR

   52,740     52,740 

Actual returns

   107           107      378     378 

Contributions

   1,762      587      2,349      539  594  1,133 

Benefit payments

   (2,345)     (587)     (2,932)     (2,346 (594 (2,940

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   (5,731)          (5,731)     (4,246    (4,246
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Fair value of plan assets, December 31, 2015

   29,446           29,446   

Fair value of plan assets, December 31, 2018

   84,122     84,122 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Funded status, December 31, 2015(1)

  $(4,980)    $(21,278)    $(26,258)  

Funded status, December 31, 2018

  $      (11,874 $      (14,859 $      (26,733
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
      

Components of the net benefit cost recognized

          

Service cost

  $121     $798     $919     $269  $467  $736 

Interest cost

   1,427      984      2,411      1,409  709  2,118 

Expected return on plan assets

   (2,054)          (2,054)     (1,694    (1,694

Amortization of unrecognized items

   878           886      915  (207 708 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net benefit costs

  $372     $1,790     $2,162     $899  $969  $1,868 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

The total of $26,345 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet also includes the pension liabilities of $87 relating to employees at the Company’s Rosenthal mill.

(123)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 7.9. Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Obligations (continued)

 

Information about the Celgar Defined Benefit Plans,Celgar’s defined benefit plans, in aggregate for the year ended December 31, 2014 is2017 was as follows:

 

   2014 
       Pension       Other Post-
  Retirement  
Benefits
         Total       

Change in benefit obligation

      

Benefit obligation, December 31, 2013

  $    43,566     $    28,458     $    72,024   

Service cost

   121      724      845   

Interest cost

   1,836      1,244      3,080   

Benefit payments

   (2,571)     (825)     (3,396)  

Actuarial losses

   3,901      1,350      5,251   

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   (3,780)     (2,486)     (6,266)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Benefit obligation, December 31, 2014

   43,073      28,465      71,538   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
      

Reconciliation of fair value of plan assets

      

Fair value of plan assets, December 31, 2013

   35,372           35,372   

Actual returns

   3,829           3,829   

Contributions

   2,126      825      2,951   

Benefit payments

   (2,571)     (825)     (3,396)  

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   (3,103)          (3,103)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets, December 31, 2014

   35,653           35,653   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Funded status, December 31, 2014(1)

  $(7,420)    $(28,465)    $(35,885)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
      

Components of the net benefit cost recognized

      

Service cost

  $121     $724     $845   

Interest cost

   1,836      1,244      3,080   

Expected return on plan assets

   (2,225)          (2,225)  

Amortization of unrecognized items

   787      (12)     775   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net benefit costs

  $519     $1,956     $2,475   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2017 
   Pension  Other Post-
Retirement
Benefits
  Total 

Change in benefit obligation

    

Benefit obligation, December 31, 2016

  $            35,125   $23,928   $            59,053  

Service cost

   95    584    679  

Interest cost

   1,339    947    2,286  

Benefit payments

   (2,222)   (706)   (2,928) 

Actuarial losses (gains)

   1,499    (5,484)   (3,985) 

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   2,494    1,519    4,013  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Benefit obligation, December 31, 2017

   38,330    20,788    59,118  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    

Reconciliation of fair value of plan assets

    

Fair value of plan assets, December 31, 2016

   33,011    —    33,011  

Actual returns

   2,564    —    2,564  

Contributions

   1,325    706    2,031  

Benefit payments

   (2,222)   (706)   (2,928) 

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

   2,379    —    2,379  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets, December 31, 2017

   37,057    —    37,057  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Funded status, December 31, 2017 (1)

  $            (1,273 $            (20,788 $            (22,061
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    

Components of the net benefit cost recognized

    

Service cost

  $                  95   $584   $                  679  

Interest cost

   1,339    947    2,286  

Expected return on plan assets

   (2,012)   —    (2,012) 

Amortization of unrecognized items

   1,074    152    1,226  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net benefit costs

  $                496   $              1,683   $              2,179  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
(1)

The total of $36,014 on$22,141 in the Consolidated Balance Sheet also includes the pension liabilities of $129$80 relating to employees at the Company’s Rosenthal mill.

The amortization of unrecognized items primarily relates to net actuarial losses. The Company expects to recognize approximately $781 of net actuarial losses in 2016. The Celgar Defined Benefit Plans do not have any net transition asset or obligation recognized as a reclassification adjustment of other comprehensive income. There are no plan assets that are expected to be returned to the Company in 2016.

and prior service costs.

(124)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 7.9. Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Obligations (continued)

 

The Company anticipates that it will make contributions to the Celgar Defined Benefit Plansdefined benefit plans of approximately $667$3,282 in 2016.2019. Estimated future benefit payments under the Celgar Defined Benefit Plansthese plans are as follows:

 

       Pension       Other Post-
    Retirement    
Benefits
 

2016

  $2,223    $707  

2017

   2,220     749  

2018

   2,224     795  

2019

   2,232     840  

2020

   2,228     884  

2021 – 2025

   10,957     5,106  
   Pension   Other Post-
Retirement
Benefits
 

2019

  $            3,922   $            660 

2020

   4,095    688 

2021

   4,258    713 

2022

   4,449    735 

2023

   4,610    759 

2024 - 2028

   25,953    4,131 

Weighted Average Assumptions

The weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations at the measurement dates and the net periodic benefit costs were as follows:follows for Celgar’s defined benefit plan:

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
        2015               2014               2013         2018 2017 2016 

Benefit obligations

          

Discount rate

   4.00%     3.75%     4.50%                 3.14             3.50             3.80

Rate of compensation increase

   2.50%     2.50%     2.75%     2.50 2.50 2.50

Net benefit cost for year ended

          

Discount rate

   3.75%     4.50%     4.00%     3.50 3.80 4.00

Rate of compensation increase

   2.50%     2.75%     2.75%     2.50 2.50 2.50

Expected rate of return on plan assets

   6.40%     6.60%     6.60%     4.40 6.00 6.40

The weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations at the measurement dates and the net benefit costs were as follows for MPR’s defined benefit plan:

December 31,
2018

Benefit obligations

Discount rate

            3.90

Rate of compensation increase

2.75

Net benefit cost for year ended

Discount rate

3.95

Rate of compensation increase

3.25

Expected rate of return on plan assets

5.15

The discount rate assumption is adjusted annually to reflect the rates available on high-quality debt instruments, with a duration that is expected to match the timing of expected pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations. High-quality debt instruments are corporate bonds with a rating of “AA” or better.

(125)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 9. Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Obligations (continued)

The expected rate of return on plan assets is a management estimate based on, among other factors, historical long-term returns, expected asset mix and active management premium.

The expected rate of compensation increase is a management estimate based on, among other factors, historical compensation increases and promotions, while considering current industry conditions, the terms of collective bargaining agreements with employees and the outlook for the industry.

The assumed health care cost trend rates used to determine the other post-retirement benefit obligations were as follows:

 

   December 31, 
           2015                   2014         

Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year

   6.50%     7.00%  

Rate to which the cost trend is assumed to decline (ultimate trend rate)

   4.50%     4.50%  

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

   2020     2020  

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 7. Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Obligations (continued)

   December 31, 
   2018   2017 

Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year

               5.50%                6.00% 

Rate to which the cost trend is assumed to decline to (ultimate trend rate)

   4.50%    4.50% 

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

   2021     2021  

The expected health care cost trend rates are based on historical trends for these costs, as well as recently enacted health care legislation. The Company also compares health care cost trend rates to those of the industry.

A one-percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effect on other post-retirement benefit obligations:

  December 31, 2015   December 31, 2014 
  1%
  Increase  
   1%
  Decrease  
   1%
  Increase  
   1%
  Decrease  
 

Effect on total service and interest rate components

 $36    $(39)    $54    $(56)  

Effect on other post-retirement benefit obligations

 $        613    $        (598)    $        830    $        (806)  

Investment Objective and Asset Allocation

The investment objective for the Celgar Defined Benefit Plansdefined benefit pension plan is to sufficiently diversify invested plan assets to maintain a reasonable level of risk without imprudently sacrificing the return on the invested funds, and ultimately to achieve a long-term total rate of return, net of fees and expenses, at least equal to the long-term interest rate assumptions used for funding actuarial valuations. To achieve this objective, the Company’s overall investment strategy is to maintain an investment allocation mix of long-term growth investments (equities) and fixed income investments (debt securities). Investment allocation targets have been established by asset class after considering the nature of the liabilities, long-term return expectations, the risks associated with key asset classes, inflation and interest rates and related management fees and expenses. In addition, the Celgar Defined Benefit Plans’defined benefit pension plan’s investment strategy seeks to minimize risk beyond legislated requirements by constraining the investment managers’ investment options. There are a number of specific constraints based on investment type, but they all have the general purpose of ensuring that the investments are fully diversified and that risk is appropriately managed. For example, no more than 10% ofthere are constraints on the book value of the assets that can be invested in any one entity or group, investments in any one entity cannot exceed 30% of the voting shares and all equity holdings must be listed on a public exchange. Reviews of the investment objectives, key assumptions and the independent investment managers are performed periodically.

PensionDe-Risking Actions

During 2017 the Company initiated a pensionde-risking strategy for Celgar’s defined benefit plan. The target asset allocationfirst step of the Celgar Defined Benefit Plans’ assets, based onstrategy resulted in changing the fair value oftarget investment mix to 80% debt securities, to more effectively hedge the assets held, is 60%plan liabilities for inactive members, and 20% equity securities, and 40%to consider the inflationary effect of future salary increases for the remaining active members.

In 2018, the Company used the debt securities. The following table presentssecurity investments in Celgar’s defined benefit plan to purchasebuy-in annuities for all inactive members. This transaction fully hedges the Celgar Defined Benefit Plans’ assets fair value measurements at December 31, 2015:plan liabilities for inactive members.

 

Asset Category

  Quoted Prices in
 Active Markets for 
Identical Assets
   Significant Other
 Observable Inputs 
   Significant
Unobservable
          Inputs          
   Total 

Equity securities

  $17,772     $    $    $17,772   

Debt securities

   11,602                11,602   

Cash

   72                72   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $                29,446     $                          -     $                        -     $                29,446   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(126)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 7.9. Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Obligations (continued)

 

Concentrations of Risk in the Celgar Defined Benefit Plans’Pension Plan’s Assets

The Company has reviewed the Celgar Defined Benefit Plans’defined benefit pension plan’s equity investments and determined that they are allocated based on the specific investment manager’s stated investment strategy with only slight over- or under-weightings within any specific category, and that those investments are within the constraints that have been set by the Company. Those constraints include a limitation on the value that can be invested in any one entity or group and the investment category targets noted above. In addition, we have threethe Company has one independent investment managers.manager. The Company has concluded that there are no significant concentrations of risk.

The following table presents the Celgar and MPR defined benefit pension plans’ assets fair value measurements as at December 31, 2018 under the fair value hierarchy:

  Fair value measurements as at December 31, 2018 using: 
Asset Category Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 

Equity securities

  $            31,230   $            —   $            —   $            31,230 

Debt securities, includingbuy-in annuities

  49,724         49,724 

Cash

  2,054         2,054 

Other

  1,114         1,114 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $            84,122   $            —   $            —   $            84,122 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Defined Contribution Plan

Effective December 31, 2008, the defined benefit plans at the Celgar Defined Benefit Plansmill were closed to new members. In addition, the related defined benefit service accrual ceased on December 31, 2008, and members began to receive pension benefits, at a fixed contractual rate, under a new defined contribution plan effective January 1, 2009. MPR also has defined contribution plans available to most of its employees. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, the Company made contributions of $646 (2014$1,024 (2017$759; 2013$959; 2016$773), to this plan.$743).

Multiemployer Plan

The Company participates in a multiemployer plan for the hourly-paid employees at the Celgar mill. The contributions to the plan are determined based on a percentage of pensionable earnings pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. The Company has no current or future contribution obligations in excess of the contractual contributions. Contributions during the year ended December 31, 20152018 totaled $1,390 (2014$2,218 (2017$2,085; 2013 – $2,635)$1,969; 2016 –$1,944).

Plan details are included in the following table:

 

   Provincially
Registered
 Plan Number 
  Expiration
Date of
Collective
Bargaining
Agreement
  

Are the Company’s
Contributions Greater Than

5% of Total Contributions

Legal name

           2015            2014            2013     

The Pulp and Paper Industry Pension Plan

  P085324  April 30,

2017

  Yes  Yes  Yes

Note 8. Income Taxes

Income (loss) before income taxes by taxing jurisdiction was as follows:

   Provincially
Registered
Plan Number
   Expiration
Date of
Collective
Bargaining
Agreement
   Are the Company’s
Contributions Greater Than 5% of
Total Contributions?
 
Legal name  2018   2017   2016 

The Pulp and Paper Industry Pension Plan

   P085324    April 30, 2021    No    No    No 

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 

United States

  $(27,788)    $(55,089)    $(31,032)  

Foreign

   132,739      159,281                14,460   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $        104,951     $        104,192     $(16,572)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The income tax benefit (provision) recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 is related to foreign tax jurisdictions.(127)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 8.10. Income Taxes (continued)

Income before provision for income taxes by taxing jurisdiction was as follows:

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2018  2017  2016 

U.S.

  $(69,202 $(41,635 $(32,511

Foreign

   246,472   145,570   91,975 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $      177,270  $      103,935  $      59,464 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The net income tax provision recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was related to foreign tax jurisdictions.

The Company’s effective income tax rate can be affected by many factors, including but not limited to, changes in the mix of earnings in tax jurisdictions with differing statutory rates, changes in corporate structure, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, the result of audit examinations of previously filed tax returns and changes in tax laws.laws and rates. The asset and liability approach is used to recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities.

The Company and/or one or more of its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the United States (“U.S.”), Germany, Canada and Canada.Australia. Currently, the Company does not anticipate that the expiration of the statute of limitations or the completion of audits in the next fiscal year will result in liabilities for uncertain income tax positions that are materially different than the amounts accrued or disclosed as ofat December 31, 2015.2018. However, this could change as tax years are examined by taxing authorities, the timing of those examinations,which are uncertain at this time. The German tax authorities have completed examinations up to and including the 20132015 tax year for all but two German entities. For one ofentity the German entities, 2008tax authorities have completed examinations up to 2014and including the 2013 tax years are being examinedyear and for the other entity 2011the German tax authorities have completed examinations up to 2014and including the 2007 tax years are being examined.year. The Company is generally not subject to U.S. or Canadian income tax examinations for tax years before 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively. The Company believes that it has adequately provided for any reasonable foreseeable outcomes related to its tax audits and that any settlement will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated results.

The liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet related to unrecognized tax benefits was $nil as at December 31, 2015 (20142018 (2017 – $nil). The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in provision for income tax benefit (provision)taxes in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, the Company recognized $nil in interest and penalties (2014(2017 – $nil; 20132016 – $nil).

Differences betweenThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”) was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes included, but were not limited to, a corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, aone-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of cumulative foreign earnings as at December 31, 2017, and a minimum tax on certain foreign earnings.

As a result of the reduction of the corporate tax rate, the Company revalued its U.S. Federal Statutorynet deferred tax asset balance, excluding after tax credits, as at December 31, 2017. Based on this revaluation, the net deferred tax asset was reduced by $27,445 and the Company’s effective rates areCompany recorded an offsetting reduction to the valuation allowance as follows:the

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
           2015                  2014                  2013         

U.S. Federal statutory rate

   35%    35%    35%  

U.S. Federal statutory rate on (income) loss before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

  $(36,972)   $(36,467)   $5,797   

Tax differential on foreign income

                 9,330     11,295     736   

Effect of foreign earnings

   (5,290)    (9,998)    (945)  

Valuation allowance

   (2,765)    52,906     (17,040)  

Tax benefit of partnership structure

   5,217     5,987     5,942   

Non-taxable foreign subsidies

   2,281     1,263     1,696   

True-up of prior year taxes

   5,073         (5,749)  

Foreign exchange on valuation allowance

   (5,005)    (7,146)    254   

Other

   (1,318)    (1,066)    113   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $(29,449)   $        16,774    $(9,196)  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    

Comprised of:

    

Current

  $(11,934)   $(5,242)   $            2,286   

Deferred

   (17,515)    22,016     (11,482)  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $(29,449)   $16,774    $(9,196)  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(128)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 8.10. Income Taxes (continued)

 

Company has a full valuation allowance against its U.S. deferred tax assets. The amount includedrelated to theone-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings was $3,473 based on cumulative foreign earnings of $22,398. The Company had loss carryforwards which were used to offset the tax. The final accounting for these impacts were finalized upon completion of the 2017 tax return and there were no material changes from the estimates reported as true-upat December 31, 2017.

The minimum tax on certain foreign earnings includes a provision to tax global intangiblelow-taxed income (“GILTI”) of priorforeign subsidiaries. The GILTI provision resulted in additional income for tax of $245,899. The Company had loss carryforwards which were used to offset the income. The Company has calculated its best estimate of the impact of the Act in its year taxes primarily includes adjustments that have been offsetend income tax provision in accordance with a change in valuation allowance.its understanding of the Act and guidance available as of the date of this filing.

Differences between the U.S. Federal statutory and the Company’s effective rates are as follows:

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2018  2017  2016 

U.S. Federal statutory rate

   21%   35%   35% 
    

U.S. Federal statutory rate on income before provision for income taxes

  $(37,227 $(36,377 $(20,812

Tax differential on foreign income

   (17,511          10,398   5,822 

Effect of foreign earnings(1)

   (51,639  (3,584  (13,850

Change in undistributed earnings

      13,297   (13,297

Change in tax rate

      (26,627   

Valuation allowance

           64,573   5,750             9,188 

Tax benefit of partnership structure

   4,208   4,937   4,933 

Non-taxable foreign subsidies

   2,908   2,735   2,118 

True-up of prior year taxes

   (9,877  (3,685  (980

Foreign exchange on valuation allowance

   (878  1,953   632 

Foreign exchange on settlement of debt

   879   1,342   3,150 

Other

   (4,117  (3,591  (1,425
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $(48,681 $(33,452 $(24,521
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
    

Comprised of:

    

Current income tax provision

  $(32,085 $(11,396 $(7,712

Deferred income tax provision

   (16,596  (22,056  (16,809
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $(48,681 $(33,452 $(24,521
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
(1)

Includes the impact of the GILTI provision.

(129)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 10. Income Taxes (continued)

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are composed of the following:

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
  2015   2014   2018 2017 

German tax loss carryforwards

  $75,668     $99,948     $35,364  $52,415 

U.S. tax loss carryforwards and credits

   65,957      54,892      8,982  47,028 

Canadian tax loss carryforwards

   217      1,661        5,672 

Basis difference between income tax and financial reporting with respect to operating pulp mills

   (58,047)     (61,205)     (138,541 (73,665

Derivative financial instruments

   1,862      5,043   

Long-term debt

   (6,253)     (3,889)     (7,232 (7,655

Payable and accrued expenses

   7,328      6,304      4,582  4,167 

Deferred pension liability

   6,911      9,413      9,657  6,122 

Capital leases

   1,146      2,450      8,269  5,879 

Research and development expense pool

   3,539      4,193      3,150  3,170 

Other

   2,282      3,183      (4,848 1,971 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 
   100,610      121,993      (80,617 45,104 

Valuation allowance

   (90,627)     (87,862)     (11,116 (75,689
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

  $9,983     $34,131   

Net deferred income tax liability

  $(91,733 $(30,585
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 
       

Comprised of:

       

Deferred income tax asset

  $23,154     $56,287     $1,374  $1,376 

Deferred income tax liability

   (13,171)     (22,156)     (93,107 (31,961
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

  $                    9,983     $            34,131   

Net deferred income tax liability

  $      (91,733 $            (30,585
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

The following table details the scheduled expiration dates of the Company’s net operating loss, interest and income tax credit carryforwards as at December 31, 2015:2018:

 

        Amount             Expiration Date     

Germany

    

Operating loss

  $          261,800    Indefinite

Interest

  $127,300    Indefinite

U.S.

    

Operating loss

  $181,300    2018 – 2035

Tax credits

  $2,500    2020 – 2025

Canada

    

Operating loss

  $800    2015 – 2035

Scientific research and experimental development tax credit

  $3,500    2030 – 2033

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 8. Income Taxes (continued)

   Amount   Expiration Date

Germany

    

Net operating loss

  $    115,700   Indefinite

Interest

  $69,000   Indefinite

U.S.

    

Net operating loss

  $8,900   2037

Income tax credits

  $7,100   2020 – 2027

Canada

    

Scientific research and experimental development tax credits

  $4,300   2030 – 2036

Australia

    

Net operating loss

  $970   Indefinite

At each reporting period, the Company assesses whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized, based on the review of all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, estimates of future taxable income, past operating results and prudent and

(130)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 10. Income Taxes (continued)

feasible tax planning strategies. The carrying value of ourthe Company’s deferred tax assets reflects ourits expected ability to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions to utilize these deferred income tax benefits. Significant judgment is required when evaluating this positive and negative evidence.

The following table summarizes the changes in valuation allowances related to net deferred tax assets:

 

            2015                       2014             2018 2017 

Balance at January 1

  $87,862     $140,768   

Balance as at January 1

  $75,689  $81,439 

Additions (reversals)

       

U.S.

   11,571      9,433      (37,709 (3,060

Canada

   (3,801)     (3,660)     (26,384 (4,643

Germany

        (51,533)  

Australia

   398��   

The impact of changes in foreign exchange rates

   (5,005)     (7,146)     (878 1,953 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Balance at December 31

  $                90,627     $              87,862   

Balance as at December 31

  $            11,116  $            75,689 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

As at December 31, 2015,2018, the Company has fully recognized all deferred tax assets for its German and Canadian entities and has not recognizeda full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets for its U.S. or Canadianand Australian entities.

The Company has not provided U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxesrecognized a tax liability on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as at December 31, 20152018 because it intendsthese earnings are expected to be permanently reinvest such earningsreinvested outside the U.S. If these foreign earnings were to beor repatriated in the future, the related U.S.without incurring a tax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes previously paid on these earnings. In addition, the Company has loss carryforwards which may be used to offset any current tax liability.

As ofat December 31, 2015,2018, the cumulative amount of undistributed earnings upon which U.S. income taxes have not been provided iswas approximately $299,100. It is not practicable to estimate the income tax liability that might be incurred if such earnings were remitted to the U.S.$413,700.

Note 9.11. Shareholders’ Equity

Dividends

During the yearyears ended December 31, 2015,2018 and 2017 the Company’s Boardboard of Directorsdirectors declared the following quarterly dividends:

 

Date Declared

  Dividend Per
Common Share
   Amount 

July 30, 2015

      $0.115         $7,418   

October 29, 2015

   0.115      7,418   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
      $                                         0.230         $                                         14,836   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Date Declared

  Dividend Per
Common Share
   Amount 

February 15, 2018

  $0.125   $8,147 

May 3, 2018

   0.125    8,150 

July 26, 2018

   0.125    8,150 

October 25, 2018

   0.125    8,150 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $0.500   $            32,597 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Date Declared

  Dividend Per
Common Share
   Amount 

February 9, 2017

  $0.115   $7,472 

April 27, 2017

   0.115    7,477 

July 27, 2017

   0.115    7,477 

October 26, 2017

   0.125    8,127 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $0.470   $            30,553 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(131)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 9.11. Shareholders’ Equity (continued)

 

Dividends are paid in the quarter subsequent to the quarter in which they were declared.

In February 2016,2019, the Company’s Boardboard of Directorsdirectors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.115$0.125 per common share. Payment of the dividend will be made on April 5, 20163, 2019 to all shareholders of record on March 28, 2016.27, 2019. Future dividends are subject to approval by the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors and may be adjusted as business and industry conditions warrant.

Share Capital

Common shares

On April 2, 2014, the Company issued an aggregate of 8,050,000 common shares by way of public offering at a price of $7.15 per share for net proceeds of $53,859 after deducting the underwriters’ discounts and offering expenses. In September 2014, the Company contributed $20,000 of the net proceeds to further capitalize the Stendal mill. The Company used the balance of the net proceeds for capital expenditures, including expansion of our wood procurement and logistics operations in Germany, and for general corporate purposes.

Preferred shares

The Company has authorized 50,000,000 preferred shares (2014(2017 – 50,000,000) with $1 par value issuable in series, of which 2,000,000 shares have been designated as Series A. The preferred shares may be issued in one or more series and with such designationsseries. Designations and preferences for each series as shall be stated in the resolutions providing for the designation and issueissuance of each such series adopted by the BoardCompany’s board of Directorsdirectors. The board of the Company. The Board of Directorsdirectors is authorized by the Company’s articles of incorporation to determine the voting, dividend, redemption and liquidation preferences pertaining to each such series. As at December 31, 2015,2018, no preferred shares had been issued by the Company.

Stock Based Compensation

In June 2010, the Company adopted a stock incentive plan (the “2010 Plan”) which provides for options, restricted stock rights, restricted shares, performance shares, performance share units (“PSUs”)PSUs and stock appreciation rights to be awarded to employees, consultants andnon-employee directors. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, there were no issued and outstanding options, restricted stock rights, performance shares or stock appreciation rights. As at December 31, 2015,2018, after factoring in all allocated shares, there remain approximately 2,049,0002.8 million common shares available for grant.

PSUs

PSUs comprise rights to receive common shares at a future date that are contingent on the Company and the grantee achieving certain performance objectives. The performance objective period is generally three years.

For the year ended December 31, 2015,2018, the Company recognized an expense of $1,819$3,422 related to PSUs (2014(2017 –$2,437; 2016$1,023; 2013 – $2,882)$4,210).

The following table summarizes PSU activity during the year:

   Number of
PSUs
  Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Unit
 

Outstanding as at January 1, 2018

   1,867,158  $9.28 

Granted

   652,548   12.75 

Vested and issued

   (153,243  13.19 

Forfeited

   (330,455  12.39 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Outstanding as at December 31, 2018

           2,036,008  $9.59 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(132)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 9.11. Shareholders’ Equity (continued)

 

The following table summarizes PSU activity during the year:

     Number of PSUs     Weighted Average
Grant Date
  Fair Value Per Unit  
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2015

   969,544     $10.64   

Granted

   471,488     $12.95   

Vested and issued

   (160,608)    $12.96   

Forfeited

   (24,505)    $10.54   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

                       1,255,919     $11.21   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The weighted-average grant date fair value per unit of all PSUs granted in 20142017 and 20132016 was $9.50$12.00 and $7.30,$6.04, respectively. The total fair value of PSUs vested and issued in 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $2,031, $3,046$1,992, $3,445 and $nil,$1,382, respectively.

Restricted Shares

Restricted shares generally vest at the end of one year; however, 200,000 restricted shares granted during the year ended December 31, 2011 vest in equal amounts over a five-year period commencing in 2012.year.

Expense recognized for the year ended December 31, 20152018 was $590 (2014$518 (2017$563; 2013$453; 2016$692)$449). As at December 31, 2015,2018, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted shares amounted to approximately $244$217 which will be amortized over the remaining vesting periods.

The following table summarizes restricted share activity during the year:

 

  Number of
    Restricted Shares    
   Weighted Average
Grant Date
 Fair Value Per Share 
   Number of
Restricted
Shares
 Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Share
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2015

   118,000     $11.58   

Outstanding as at January 1, 2018

   43,635  $11.80 

Granted

   38,000     $14.48      31,130  16.70 

Vested and issued

   (78,000)    $10.91      (43,635 11.80 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

                       78,000     $13.65   

Outstanding as at December 31, 2018

   31,130  $16.70 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of all restricted shares granted in 20142017 and 20132016 was $8.85$11.80 and $7.00,$9.41, respectively. The total fair value of restricted shares vested and issued in 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $1,096, $670$703, $437 and $532,$697, respectively.

Stock OptionsNote 12. Net Income Per Common Share

During the year ended December 31, 2015, no options were granted, no options expired, 30,000 stock options were exercised for proceeds of $219 and 25,000 stock options were cancelled in exchange for $154. The Company has no stock options outstanding as at December 31, 2015.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2018   2017   2016 

Net income

      

Basic and diluted

  $128,589   $70,483   $34,943 
      

Net income per common share

      

Basic

  $1.97   $1.09   $0.54 

Diluted

  $1.96   $1.08   $0.54 
      

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

      

Basic(1)

   65,133,467    64,915,955    64,631,491 

Effect of dilutive shares:

      

PSUs

   619,411    458,236    447,465 

Restricted shares

   17,962    18,914    19,309 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

       65,770,840        65,393,105        65,098,265 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding excludes 31,130 restricted shares which have been issued, but have not vested as at December 31, 2018 (2017 – 43,635 restricted shares; 2016 – 38,000 restricted shares).

Expense recognized for the year ended December 31, 2015 related to stock options was $nil (2014 – $nil; 2013 – $nil).(133)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 10.12. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share Attributable to Common Shareholders(continued)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 

Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders

      

Basic and diluted

  $75,502    $113,154    $(26,375)  
      

Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders

      

Basic

  $1.17    $1.82    $(0.47)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

  $1.17    $1.81    $(0.47)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
      

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

      

Basic (1)

    64,380,565      62,012,947      55,673,838  

Effect of dilutive shares:

      

PSUs

   335,922     406,922     -  

Restricted shares

   56,453     79,889     -  

Stock options

   3,852     15,112     -  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

   64,776,792     62,514,870     55,673,838  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

For the year ended December 31, 2015, the basic weighted average number of shares excludes 78,000 restricted shares which have been issued, but have not vested as at December 31, 2015 (2014 – 118,000 restricted shares; 2013 – 158,000 restricted shares).

The calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholdersshare does not assume the exercise of any instruments that would have an anti-dilutive effect on net income per common share. The following table summarizesThere were no anti-dilutive instruments for the instruments excluded from the calculation of net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders because they were anti-dilutive:years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 

PSUs

                      -                         -             791,432   

Restricted shares

             158,000   

Stock Options

             75,000   

Note 11.13. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
       2015           2014     

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  $(156,223)    $(33,268)  

Unrecognized losses and prior service costs related to defined benefit plans

   (15,338)     (19,287)  

Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities

   (13)     114   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  $        (171,574)    $        (52,441)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 12. Noncontrolling Interest

In September 2014, concurrent with the settlement of all outstanding loans payable to the noncontrolling shareholder of the Stendal mill, the Company paid $444 (€0.35 million) to acquire substantially all of the remaining shares of the noncontrolling interest and other rights in the Stendal mill. Accordingly, the Company included the noncontrolling interest in its consolidated results subsequent to this transaction. The increase in ownership was accounted for as an equity transaction and as a result, the noncontrolling interest was reduced by $2,949 and retained earnings, which includes legal fees of approximately $200 associated with the transaction, was reduced by $4,770. In addition, the Company reclassified to retained earnings $18,985 of negative paid-in capital concurrent with the buyout of the noncontrolling interest in the Stendal mill.

   Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustment
  Defined Benefit
Pension and
Other Post-
Retirement
Benefit Items
  Unrealized
Gains / Losses
on Marketable
Securities
  Total 

Balance as at December 31, 2016

  $(170,592 $(14,663 $(14 $(185,269

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

   120,509   4,537   (4  125,042 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss

      1,226      1,226 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   120,509   5,763   (4  126,268 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as at December 31, 2017

   (50,083  (8,900  (18  (59,001
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

   (76,920  7,022   21   (69,877

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss

      708      708 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   (76,920  7,730   21   (69,169
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as at December 31, 2018

  $        (127,003 $(1,170 $3  $      (128,170
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Note 13.14. Business Segment Information

The Company has three operating segments,is managed based on the individualprimary products it manufactures: pulp and wood products. Accordingly, the Company’s four pulp mills thatand its 50% interest in the NBSK pulp mill are aggregated into onethe pulp business segment, and the Friesau mill is a separate reportable business segment, market pulp, duewood products. The Company’s sandalwood business is included in Corporate and Other as it does not meet the criteria to the similar economic characteristicsbe reported as a separate segment.

None of the mills. Accordingly,income or loss items following operating income in the results presented are those of the one reportable business segment.

The following table presents net sales to external customers by product and by geographic area based on location of the customer:

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 

Pulp revenues

      

Germany

  $344,843     $346,879     $321,711   

China

   266,632      276,848      300,827   

Other European Union countries(1)

   210,218      250,952      224,988   

Italy

   53,919      80,730      65,654   

Other Asia

   43,981      69,711      49,855   

U.S.

   15,453      39,146      30,404   

Other countries

   11,191      9,366      2,748   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   946,237      1,073,632      996,187   

Energy and chemical revenues

      

Germany

   75,776      91,375      79,948   

Canada

   11,191      10,105      12,250   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $    1,033,204     $    1,175,112     $    1,088,385   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Not including Germany or Italy; includes new entrant countries to the European Union from their time of admission.

The following table presents total long-lived assets by geographic area based on location of the asset:

   December 31, 
   2015   2014 

Germany

  $623,932     $711,368   

Canada

   138,459      171,782   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $        762,391     $        883,150   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 13. Business Segment Information (continued)

In 2015, one customer through several of its operations accounted for 16% of the Company’s total pulp sales (2014 – one customer through several of its operations accounted for 13%; 2013 – two customers through several of their operations accounted for 10% and 11%, respectively).

Note 14. Derivative Transactions

The Company is exposed to certain market risks relating to its ongoing business. The Company seeks to manage these risks through internal risk management policies as well as, from time to time, the use of derivatives. The derivatives are measured at fair value with changes in fair value immediately recognized in gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The following table showsOperations are allocated to the derivative gains and lossessegments, since those items are reviewed separately by instrument type as they are recognized in gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations:management.

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 

Interest rate derivative contract

  $(935)    $11,501     $22,476   

Pulp price derivative contracts

             (2,767)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $          (935)    $        11,501     $        19,709   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest Rate Derivative(134)

During 2002, the Company entered into certain variable-to-fixed interest rate swaps in connection with the Stendal mill with respect to an aggregate maximum amount of approximately €612.6 million of the principal amount of the indebtedness under the Stendal mill’s senior project finance facility, which was settled in November 2014. Under the remaining interest rate swaps, the Company pays a fixed rate and receives a floating rate with the derivative payments being calculated on a notional amount. As at December 31, 2015, the contract has a fair value of €15.6 million ($16,913; 2014 – $32,794) of which €9.6 million ($10,380; 2014 – $14,832) is classified as current within accounts payable and other and €6.0 million ($6,533; 2014 – $17,962) is classified as a long-term liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The contract has an aggregate notional amount of €192.4 million, a fixed interest rate of 5.28% and matures in October 2017.

The Company has pledged as collateral cash in the amount of 67% of the fair value of the interest rate swap up to €8.5 million to the derivative counterparty. The calculation to determine the collateral is performed semi-annually, with the final calculation in October 2017. As at December 31, 2015, the collateral was €8.5 million ($9,230; 2014 – $10,286). This cash has been classified as restricted cash in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The counterparty to the interest rate derivative is a bank that is a member of a banking syndicate that holds the Stendal €75.0 million revolving credit facility and the Company does not anticipate non-performance by the bank.


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 14. Derivative Transactions (continued)Business Segment Information(continued)

 

Information about certain segment data for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, was as follows:

December 31, 2018

  Pulp   Wood
Products
   Corporate and
Other
  Consolidated 

Revenues from external customers

  $1,268,204   $189,036   $478  $1,457,718 

Operating income (loss)

  $274,356   $6,203   $(12,692 $267,867 

Depreciation and amortization

  $87,628   $8,485   $616  $96,729 

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

  $66,207   $20,682   $123  $87,012 

Total assets(1)

  $1,698,071   $131,754   $145,910  $1,975,735 

Revenues by major products

       

Pulp

  $1,190,588   $   $  $1,190,588 

Lumber

       168,663       168,663 

Energy and chemicals

   77,616    10,831    478   88,925 

Wood residuals

       9,542       9,542 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

  $1,268,204   $189,036   $478  $1,457,718 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Revenues by geographical markets

       

U.S.

  $55,692   $52,770   $  $108,462 

Germany

   499,620    73,854       573,474 

China

   291,657           291,657 

Other countries

   421,235    62,412    478   484,125 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

  $1,268,204   $189,036   $478  $1,457,718 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
(1)

Total assets for the pulp segment includes the Company’s $62,574 investment in the 50% owned NBSK pulp mill.

December 31, 2017

  Pulp   Wood
Products
   Corporate and
Other
  Consolidated 

Revenues from external customers

  $1,071,715   $97,430   $  $1,169,145 

Operating income (loss)

  $171,279   $5,610   $(8,335 $168,554 

Depreciation and amortization

  $80,833   $4,060   $401  $85,294 

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

  $54,534   $3,197   $184  $57,915 

Total assets

  $1,253,545   $116,320   $354,845  $1,724,710 

Revenues by major products

       

Pulp

  $979,645   $   $  $979,645 

Lumber

       82,176       82,176 

Energy and chemicals

   92,070    8,872       100,942 

Wood residuals

       6,382       6,382 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

  $1,071,715   $97,430   $  $1,169,145 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Revenues by geographical markets

       

U.S.

  $23,572   $20,060   $  $43,632 

Germany

   421,895    47,146       469,041 

China

   292,231           292,231 

Other countries

   334,017    30,224       364,241 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

  $1,071,715   $97,430   $  $1,169,145 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

(135)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 14. Business Segment Information(continued)

December 31, 2016

  Pulp   Wood
Products
   Corporate
and Other
  Consolidated 

Revenues from external customers

  $931,623   $   $  $931,623 

Operating income (loss)

  $124,594   $   $(9,470 $115,124 

Depreciation and amortization

  $71,476   $   $508  $71,984 

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

  $42,462   $   $64  $42,526 

Revenues by major products

       

Pulp

  $847,328   $   $  $847,328 

Lumber

               

Energy and chemicals

   84,295           84,295 

Wood residuals

               
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

  $931,623   $   $  $931,623 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Revenues by geographical markets

       

U.S.

  $26,985   $   $  $26,985 

Germany

   401,802           401,802 

China

   221,773           221,773 

Other countries

   281,063           281,063 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

  $      931,623   $        —   $        —  $      931,623 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Revenues between segments are accounted for at prices that approximate fair value. These include revenues from the sale of residual fiber from the wood products segment to the pulp segment for use in the pulp production process and from the sale of residual fuel from the pulp segment to the wood products segment for use in energy production. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the pulp segment sold $1,343 of residual fuel to the wood products segment (2017 – $1,350) and the wood products segment sold $18,537 of residual fiber to the pulp segment (2017 – $12,697).

The following table presents total long-lived assets by geographic area based on location of the asset:

   December 31, 
   2018   2017 

Germany

  $655,260   $681,141 

Canada

   355,817    163,707 

Australia

   18,180     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $    1,029,257   $    844,848 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

In 2018, one customer for the pulp segment through several of their operations accounted for 13% of the Company’s total revenues (2017 – one customer through several of their operations accounted for 13%; 2016 – two customers through several of their operations accounted for 19% and 10%).

Note 15. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement

Due to their short-term maturity, the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable and other approximates their fair value.

(136)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 15. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement(continued)

The carrying value of the revolving credit facilities classified as Level 2 approximates their fair value as the variable interest rates reflect current interest rates for financial instruments with similar characteristics and maturities. The fair value of the Senior Notes classified as Level 2 was determined using quoted prices in a dealer market, or using recent market transactions.

The following tables present a summary of the Company’s outstanding financial instruments and their estimated fair values under the fair value hierarchy:

   Fair value measurements as at December 31, 2018 using: 
Description  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 

Revolving credit facility

  $   $58,968   $   $58,968 

Senior notes

       965,000        965,000 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $   $1,023,968   $   $1,023,968 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Fair value measurements as at December 31, 2017 using: 
Description  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 

Revolving credit facility

  $   $25,185   $   $25,185 

Senior notes

       989,125        989,125 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $   $      1,014,310   $   $      1,014,310 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Credit Risk

The Company’s credit risk is primarily attributable to cash held in bank accounts and accounts receivable. The Company maintains cash balances in foreign financial institutions in excess of insured limits. The Company limits its credit exposure on cash held in bank accounts by periodically investing cash in excess of short-term operating requirements and debt obligations in low risk government bonds, or similar debt instruments. The Company’s credit risk associated with the sale of pulp, productslumber and other wood residuals is managed through setting credit limits, the purchase of credit insurance and for certain customers a letter of credit is received prior to shipping itsthe product. Concentrations of credit risk on the sale of pulp, productslumber and other wood residuals are with customers and agents based primarily in Germany, China and Italy.

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents of $99,629, restricted cash of $9,230$240,491 and accounts receivable of $134,254$252,692 recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, net of any allowances for losses, represents the Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk.

Note 15. Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure

Due to their short-term maturity, the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable and other approximates their fair value.(137)

The fair value of the interest rate derivative liability classified as Level 2 is determined using a discounted cash flow model that uses as its basis readily observable market inputs, such as forward interest rates and yield curves observable at specified intervals. The observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, including the Euribor rate provided by the counterparty to the interest rate derivative.

The fair value of debt classified as Level 2 is determined using quoted prices in a dealer market, or using recent market transactions. The fair value of debt classified as Level 3 was valued using a discounted cash flow model.

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s outstanding financial instruments and their estimated fair values under the fair value hierarchy:

                                                                                    
   Fair value measurements at December 31, 2015 using: 
Description  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 

Liabilities

        

Interest rate derivative

  $-    $16,913    $-    $16,913  

Debt

        

Senior Notes

   -     654,625     -     654,625  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $-    $671,538    $-    $671,538  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 15. Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure (continued)

   Fair value measurements at December 31, 2014 using:
Description       Level 1            Level 2            Level 3             Total     

Liabilities

        

Interest rate derivative

  $    $32,794     $    $32,794   

Debt

        

Senior Notes

        657,500           657,500   

Revolving credit facilities

        25,412           25,412   

Payment-in-kind note

             12,101      12,101   
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

  $                  -     $      715,706     $      12,101     $      727,807   
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note 16. Lease Commitments

Minimum lease payments, primarily for various vehicles, and plant and equipment under capital andnon-cancellable operating leases and the present value of net minimum payments as at December 31, 20152018 are as follows:

 

   Capital
Leases
  Operating
Leases

2016

  $            2,532    $            1,380  

2017

   1,957     1,266  

2018

   1,327     1,261  

2019

   2,344     772  

2020

   240     -  

Thereafter

   244     -  
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   8,644    $4,679  
    

 

 

 

Less: imputed interest

   344    
  

 

 

 

  

Total present value of minimum capitalized payments

   8,300    

Less: current portion of capital lease obligations

   2,433    
  

 

 

 

  

Long-term capital lease obligations

  $5,867    
  

 

 

 

  

In June 2015, the Company entered into certain non-cancellable capital leases for transportation vehicles that will be delivered in 2016, with total minimum lease payments of $12,656 over the 12-year term of the leases.

   Capital
Leases
   Operating
Leases
 

2019

  $6,302   $3,309 

2020

   3,601    2,963 

2021

   3,441    2,717 

2022

   3,278    2,557 

2023

   3,410    2,057 

Thereafter

   17,025    5,360 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   37,057   $          18,963 
    

 

 

 

Less: imputed interest

   7,477   
  

 

 

   

Total present value of minimum capitalized payments

   29,580   

Less: current portion of capital lease obligations

   4,911   
  

 

 

   

Long-term capital lease obligations

  $          24,669   
  

 

 

   

The current portion of the capital lease obligations iswas included in accounts payable and other and the long-term portion iswas included in capital leases and other in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Rent expense under operating leases was $2,271$1,413 for the year ended December 31, 2015 (20142018 (2017$2,978; 2013$1,697; 2016$3,497)$1,393).

Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies

 

(a)

The Company is involved in legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of any legal actions and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management that the outcome of any such claimclaims which isare pending or threatened, either individually or on a combined

MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

basis, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.

 

(b)

In 2012, as a result of a regular tax field audit for the Stendal mill, German public authorities commenced a preliminary investigation into past managers of the mill relating to whether certain settlement amounts received by the Stendal mill in 2007, 2010 and 2011 from the main contractor under the contract for the construction of the Stendal mill should have reduced the assessment base for the original investment subsidies granted to the mill by German authorities. The payments were made by the contractor to the Stendal mill to settle certain warranty, performance and remediation claims that the Stendal mill made against the contractor after completion of mill construction. The amounts under review aggregate approximately €8.3 million ($9,013). Investment subsidies received by the Stendal mill were generally based upon a percentage of the assessment base for subsidies of the mill. If the settlement payments received by the Stendal mill result in a reduction of the assessment base for subsidies under applicable German rules there could be a proportionate reduction in the investment subsidies and the difference could be repayable by the Stendal mill. The Stendal mill believes that it has properly recorded the settlement amounts received from the contractor and that the same do not reduce the assessment base for subsidies of the mill. While it is not reasonably possible to predict the outcome of the legal action and claim, it is the opinion of management that the outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.

(c)

The Company is subject to regulations that require the handling and disposal of asbestos in a prescribed manner if a property undergoes a major renovation or demolition. Otherwise, the Company is not required to remove asbestos from its facilities. Generally asbestos is found on steam and condensate piping systems as well as certain cladding on buildings and in building insulation throughout older facilities. The Company’s obligation for the proper removal and disposal of asbestos products from the Company’s mills is a conditional asset retirement obligation. As a result of the longevity of the Company’s mills, due in part to the maintenance procedures and the fact that the Company does not have plans for major changes that require the removal of asbestos, the timing of the asbestos removal is indeterminate. As a result, the Company is currently unable to reasonably estimate the fair value of its asbestos removal and disposal obligation. The Company will recognize a liability in the period in which sufficient information is available to reasonably estimate its fair value.

(138)


MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

(c)

In March 2018, the Company announced it had received the decision of the tribunal in respect of its previously initiated claim in January 2012 against the Government of Canada under the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”). The basis of the claim was that the Celgar mill had received discriminatory treatment regarding its ability to purchase and sell energy compared to other pulp mills and entities that generate and sell electricity within the Province of British Columbia. The tribunal ruled that there was no violation of NAFTA and as is customary in these matters, the tribunal awarded costs to the Government of Canada of approximately $6,951. The Company settled this amount in January 2019.

(139)


SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

(UNAUDITED)

Selected Quarterly Financial Data

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data)

 

   Quarters Ended 
   March 31   June 30   September 30   December 31 

2015

        

Revenues

  $    257,547    $    266,936    $    270,893    $    237,828  

Gross profit

   43,931     33,549     44,032     44,172  

Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders

   13,634     16,412     23,760     21,696  

Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders*

  $0.21    $0.25    $0.37    $0.33  

2014

        

Revenues

  $305,685    $285,192    $301,610    $282,625  

Gross profit

   39,243     22,021     48,186     52,348  

Gain (loss) on settlement of debt

   -     -     31,851     (28,494

Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders

   21,041     571     88,337     3,205  

Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders*

  $0.37    $0.01    $1.37    $0.05  
   Quarters Ended 
   March 31   June 30  September 30   December 31 

2018

       

Revenues

  $    367,903   $    346,532  $    331,058   $    412,225 

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization

   254,285    271,134   230,009    276,673 

Cost of sales depreciation and amortization

   23,209    22,906   23,197    26,976 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

   90,409    52,492   77,852    108,576 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   14,361    15,016   14,506    17,579 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

   76,048    37,476   63,346    90,997 

Net income

   25,649    16,755   41,176    45,009 

Net income per share*

  $0.39   $0.26  $0.63   $0.68 
       

2017

       

Revenues

  $242,784   $283,177  $305,498   $337,686 

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization

   172,596    230,534   228,941    233,948 

Cost of sales depreciation and amortization

   19,116    20,521   22,568    22,688 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

   51,072    32,122   53,989    81,050 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   9,726    13,259   12,327    14,367 
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

   41,346    18,863   41,662    66,683 

Net income (loss)

   9,726    (2,104  21,143    41,718 

Net income (loss) per share*

  $0.15   $(0.03 $0.32   $0.64 

 

*

On a diluted basis

(140)


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

Description of Exhibit

3.1

Articles of Incorporation of Mercer International Inc., as amended. Incorporated by reference fromForm 8-A filed March 2, 2006.

3.2

Bylaws of Mercer International Inc. Incorporated by reference from Form8-A filed March 2, 2006.

4.1

Indenture dated November 26, 2014 between Mercer International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 2022 Senior Notes. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed November 28, 2014.

4.2

Indenture dated February 3, 2017 between Mercer International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 2024 Senior Notes. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed February 3, 2017.

4.3

Indenture dated December 20, 2017 between Mercer International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 2026 Senior Notes. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed December 20, 2017.

4.4

Indenture dated December 7, 2018 between Mercer International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 2025 Senior Notes. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed December 7, 2018.

10.1*

Revolving Credit Facility Agreement dated December 19, 2018 amongZellstoff-und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH, Mercer Timber Products GmbH, Zellstoff Stendal GmbH, Mercer Holz GmbH, Stendal Pulp Holding GmbH, D&Z Holding GmbH, Zellstoff Stendal Transport GmbH, Mercer Pulp Sales GmbH, UniCredit Bank AG, Commerzbank AG, Luxembourg Branch, Credit Suisse AG, London Branch, LandesbankBaden-Württemberg and Royal Bank of Canada.

10.2

Revolving Credit Facility Agreement dated November 25, 2014 among Zellstoff Stendal GmbH, UniCredit Bank AG, Credit Suisse AG, London Branch, Royal Bank of Canada and Barclays Bank PLC. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed November 28, 2014.

10.3

Form of Trustee’s Indemnity Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and its Trustees. Incorporated by reference from Form10-K filed March 31, 2003.[P]

10.4†

Mercer International Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended. Incorporated by reference from Appendix A to Mercer International Inc.’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed April 24, 2014.

10.5†

Employment Agreement effective November 1, 2005 between Mercer International Inc. and Leonhard Nossol dated August 18, 2005. Incorporated by reference from Form10-Q filed May 6, 2008.

10.6†

Employment Agreement dated October 2, 2006 between Stendal Pulp Holding GmbH and Wolfram Ridder. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed October 3, 2006.

10.7

Electricity Purchase Agreement effective January 27, 2009 between Zellstoff Celgar Limited Partnership and British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority. Incorporated by reference from Form10-K filed March 2, 2009. Certainnon-public information has been omitted from the appendices to Exhibit 10.9 pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the SEC. Suchnon-public information was filed with the SEC on a confidential basis. The SEC approved the request for confidential treatment in March 2009.

10.8

Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of July 16, 2018 among Zellstoff Celgar Limited Partnership, as borrower, and the lenders from time to time parties thereto, as lenders, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, as agent. Incorporated by reference from Form10-Q filed July 26, 2018.


10.9

Share Purchase Agreement by and among Marubeni Corporation, Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd. and Daishowa North America Corporation and Mercer International Inc. dated as of October 3, 2018. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed October 9, 2018.

10.10†

Employment Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and David Ure dated August 12, 2013. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed on July 19, 2015.

10.11

First Amending Agreement dated October 21, 2014 among Zellstoff Celgar Limited Partnership, Mercer International Inc., as guarantor, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. Incorporated by reference from Form10-Q filed October 31, 2014.

10.12†

Amendment to Employment Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and David Ure, dated July 17, 2015. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed July 19, 2015.

10.13†

Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and Jimmy S.H. Lee, dated for reference September 29, 2015. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed September 29, 2015.

10.14†

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and David M. Gandossi, dated for reference September 29, 2015. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed September 29, 2015.

10.15

Registration Rights Agreement dated December 7, 2018 between Mercer International Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, related to the 2025 Senior Notes. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed on December 7, 2018.

21.1*

List of Subsidiaries of Registrant.

23.1*

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

31.1*

Section 302 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer.

31.2*

Section 302 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer.

32.1*

Section 906 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer.

32.2*

Section 906 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer.

101*

The following financial statements from the Company’s annual report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iii) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

*

Filed herewith.

Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 MERCER INTERNATIONAL INC.

Dated: February 12, 201614, 2019

 

By:

 

    /s/ JIMMY S.H. LEE

  

     Jimmy S.H. Lee

  

     Executive Chairman

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

/s/ JIMMY S.H. LEE

Date: February 12, 2016

Jimmy S.H. Lee

Executive Chairman and Director

    

Date: February 14, 2019

/s/ DAVID M. GANDOSSI

Date: February 12, 2016

David M. Gandossi

Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive

Officer and Director

    

Date: February 14, 2019

/s/ DAVID K.URE

Date: February 12, 2016

David K. Ure

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial

Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer

/s/ ERIC LAURITZEN

    

Date: February 12, 201614, 2019

Eric Lauritzen

Director

/s/ WILLIAM D. MCCARTNEY

Date: February 12, 2016

William D. McCartney

Director

    

/s/ GRAEME A. WITTS

Date: February 12, 201614, 2019

Graeme A. Witts

Director

/s/ BERNARD PICCHI

Date: February 12, 2016

Bernard Picchi

Director

    

Date: February 14, 2019

/s/ JAMES SHEPHERD

Date: February 12, 2016

James Shepherd

Director

    

Date: February 14, 2019

/s/ KEITH PURCHASE

Date: February 12, 2016

Keith Purchase

Director

    

Date: February 14, 2019

/s/ NANCY ORRMARTHA MORFITT

Martha Morfitt

Director

    

Date: February 12, 201614, 2019

Nancy Orr/s/ ALAN WALLACE

Alan Wallace

Director

    

Date: February 14, 2019

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

Description of Exhibit

2.1

/s/ LINDA WELTY

Linda Welty

Director

    

Agreement and Plan of Merger among Mercer International Inc., Mercer International Regco Inc. and Mercer Delaware Inc. dated DecemberDate: February 14, 2005. Incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus filed on December 15, 2005.2019

3.1

Articles of Incorporation of Mercer International Inc., as amended. Incorporated by reference from Form 8-A filed March 2, 2006.

3.2

Bylaws of Mercer International Inc. Incorporated by reference from Form 8-A filed March 2, 2006.

4.1

Indenture dated November 26, 2014 between Mercer International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 2019 Senior Notes. Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed November 28, 2014.

4.2

Indenture dated November 26, 2014 between Mercer International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, relating to the 2022 Senior Notes. Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed November 28, 2014.

10.1

Revolving Credit Facility Agreement dated November 25, 2014 among Zellstoff Stendal GmbH, UniCredit Bank AG, Credit Suisse AG, London Branch, Royal Bank of Canada and Barclays Bank PLC. Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed November 28, 2014.

10.2

Form of Trustee’s Indemnity Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and its Trustees. Incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed March 31, 2003.

10.3†

2004 Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference from Form S-8 filed June 16, 2004.

10.4†

Mercer International Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference from Appendix A to Mercer International Inc.’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed April 24, 2014.

10.5†

Employment Agreement effective September 1, 2005 between Mercer International Inc. and Leonhard Nossol dated August 18, 2005. Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed May 6, 2008.

10.6†

Employment Agreement dated October 20, 2005 between Mercer Pulp Sales GmbH and David Cooper. Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed April 29, 2015.

10.7†

Employment Agreement dated October 2, 2006 between Stendal Pulp Holding GmbH and Wolfram Ridder. Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed October 3, 2006.

10.8

Electricity Purchase Agreement effective January 27, 2009 between Zellstoff Celgar Limited Partnership and British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority. Incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed March 2, 2009. Certain non-public information has been omitted from the appendices to Exhibit 10.9 pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the SEC. Such non-public information was filed with the SEC on a confidential basis. The SEC approved the request for confidential treatment in March 2009.

10.9

Revolving Credit Facility Agreement dated August 19, 2009 among D&Z Holding GmbH, Zellstoff-und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH, D&Z Beteiligungs GmbH and ZPR Logistik GmbH and Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG. Incorporated by reference from Form8-K filed August 24, 2009.

10.10

Extension, Amendment and Confirmation Letter dated October 4, 2012 among Zellstoff- und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH, D&Z Holding GmbH, D&Z Beteiligungs GmbH, ZPR Logistik GmbH, Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG and Mercer International Inc. Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed November 2, 2012.


10.11

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 2, 2013 among Zellstoff Celgar Limited Partnership, as borrower, and the lenders from time to time parties thereto, as lenders, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, as agent. Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed May 8, 2013.

10.12*

Second Extension, Amendment and Confirmation Letter dated February 5, 2016 among Zellstoff- und Papierfabrik Rosenthal GmbH, D&Z Holding GmbH, ZPR Logistik GmbH and Mercer International Inc.

10.13†

Employment Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and David Ure dated August 12, 2013. Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed on July 19, 2015.

10.14

First Amending Agreement dated October 21, 2014 between Zellstoff Celgar Limited Partnership, Mercer International Inc., as guarantor, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed October 31, 2014.

10.15†

Amendment to Employment Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and David Ure, dated July 17, 2015. Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed July 19, 2015.

10.16†

Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and Jimmy S.H. Lee, dated for reference September 29, 2015. Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed September 28, 2015.

10.17†

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Mercer International Inc. and David M. Gandossi, dated for reference September 29, 2015. Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed September 28, 2015.

14.1

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Incorporated by reference from Mercer International Inc.’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed August 11, 2003.

21.1*

List of Subsidiaries of Registrant.

23.1*

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

31.1*

Section 302 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer.

31.2*

Section 302 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer.

32.1*

Section 906 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer.

32.2*

Section 906 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer.

101*

The following financial statements from the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the SEC on February 12, 2016, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

*

Filed herewith.

Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.