SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(MARK ONE)
x |
| |
| (MARK ONE) |
| ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
|
| |
¨
| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the transition period from to . |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number:number 001-13439
Dril-Quip, Inc.
DRIL-QUIP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| |
| Delaware | | 74-2162088 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| | (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
|
| |
Houston, Texas | | 77041 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713) 939-7711
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| |
Title of Each Class | | Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered |
| Common Stock, $.01 par value per share | | New York Stock Exchange |
Rights to Purchase Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock | | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes xý No ¨ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No xý Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes xý No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes xý No ¨ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. xý Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| | |
| | | |
| Large accelerated filer | | x | ý | Accelerated filer | | ¨ |
| | | |
| Non-Accelerated filer | | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No xý At June 30,
2015,2016, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately
$2,895,800,000$2,183,800,000 based on the closing price of such stock on such date of
$75.25.$58.43.
At February
22, 2016,27, 2017, the number of shares outstanding of registrant’s Common Stock was
37,953,302.37,806,683.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its
20162017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes certain statements that may be deemed to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Statements contained in all parts of this document that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that are beyond the control of Dril-Quip, Inc. (the “Company” or “Dril-Quip”). You can identify the Company’s forward-looking statements by the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “project,” “believe” and similar expressions, or by the Company’s discussion of strategies or trends. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, no
assurancesassurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct. These forward-looking statements include the following types of information and statements as they relate to the Company:
future operating results and cash flow;
scheduled, budgeted and other future capital expenditures;
working capital requirements;
the need for and the availability of expected sources of liquidity;
the introduction into the market of the Company’s future products;
the market for the Company’s existing and future products;
the Company’s ability to develop new applications for its technologies;
the exploration, development and production activities of the Company’s customers;
compliance with present and future environmental regulations and costs associated with environmentally related penalties, capital expenditures, remedial actions and proceedings;
effects of pending legal proceedings;
changes in customers’ future product and service requirements that may not be cost effective or within the Company’s capabilities; and
future operations, financial results, business plans and cash needs.
These statements are based on assumptions and analyses in light of the Company’s experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors the Company believes were appropriate in the circumstances when the statements were made. Forward-looking statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected results, and actual future results could differ materially from those described in such statements. While it is not possible to identify all factors, the Company continues to face many risks and uncertainties. Among the factors that could cause actual future results to differ materially are the risks and uncertainties discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this report and the following:
the volatility of oil and natural gas prices;
the cyclical nature of the oil and gas industry;
uncertainties associated with the United States and worldwide economies;
uncertainties regarding political tensions in the Middle East, South America, Africa and elsewhere;
current and potential governmental regulatory actions in the United States and regulatory actions and political unrest in other countries;
uncertainties regarding future oil and gas exploration and production activities, including new regulations, customs requirements and product testing requirements;
operating interruptions (including explosions, fires, weather-related incidents, mechanical failure, unscheduled downtime, labor difficulties, transportation interruptions, spills and releases and other environmental risks);
project terminations, suspensions or scope adjustments to contracts reflected in the Company’s backlog;
the Company’s reliance on product development;
technological developments;
the Company’s reliance on third-party technologies;
acquisition and merger activities involving the Company or its competitors;
the Company’s dependence on key employees and skilled machinists, fabricators and technical personnel;
the Company’s reliance on sources of raw materials;
impact of environmental matters, including future environmental regulations;
competitive products and pricing pressures;
fluctuations in foreign currency;currency, including those attributable to Brexit;
the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to set and maintain production levels and pricing;
the Company’s reliance on significant customers;
creditworthiness of the Company’s customers;
fixed-price contracts;
changes in general economic, market or business conditions;
access to capital markets;
negative outcome of litigation, threatened litigation or government proceedings;
terrorist threats or acts, war and civil disturbances; and
the interpretationchanges to, and differing interpretations of, foreign tax laws with respect to our foreignoperations and subsidiaries.
Many of such factors are beyond the Company’s ability to control or predict. Any of the factors, or a combination of these factors, could materially affect the Company’s future results of operations and the ultimate accuracy of the forward-looking statements. Management cautions against putting undue reliance on forward-looking statements or projecting any future results based on such statements or present or prior earnings levels. Every forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement, and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement.
Item 1. Business
Dril-Quip, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “Dril-Quip”), designs, manufactures, sells and services highly engineered
offshore drilling and production equipment that is well suited
primarily for use in deepwater, harsh environment and severe service applications. The Company’s principal products consist of subsea and
surface wellheads, subsea and surface production trees, subsea control systems and manifolds, mudline hanger systems, specialty connectors and associated pipe, drilling and production riser systems, liner hangers, wellhead connectors, diverters and diverters.safety valves. Dril-Quip’s products are used by major integrated, large independent and foreign national oil and gas companies and drilling contractors primarily in offshore areas throughout the world. Dril-Quip also provides technical advisory assistance on an as-requested basis during installation of its products, as well as rework and reconditioning services for customer-owned Dril-Quip products. In addition, Dril-Quip’s customers may rent or purchase running tools from the Company for use in the installation and retrieval of the Company’s products.
Dril-Quip has developed its broad line of subsea equipment, surface equipment and offshore rig equipment primarily through its internal product research and development efforts. The Company believes that it has achieved significant market share and brand name recognition with respect to its established products due to the technological capabilities, reliability, cost effectiveness and operational timesaving features of these products.
The Company’s operations are organized into three geographic segments—Western Hemisphere (including North and South America; headquartered in Houston, Texas), Eastern Hemisphere (including Europe and Africa; headquartered in Aberdeen, Scotland) and Asia-Pacific (including the Pacific Rim, Southeast Asia, Australia, India and the Middle East; headquartered in Singapore). Each of these segments sells similar products and services, and the Company has major manufacturing facilities in all three of its headquarter locations as well as in Macae, Brazil. The Company maintains additional facilities for fabrication and/or reconditioning and rework in Australia, Norway, Denmark, Nigeria, Indonesia, China, Egypt, Ghana and Qatar. The Company’s manufacturing operations are vertically integrated, allowing it to perform substantially all of its forging, heat treating, machining, fabrication, inspection, assembly and testing at its own facilities. The Company’s major subsidiaries are Dril-Quip (Europe) Limited, located in Aberdeen with branches in Denmark, Norway and Holland; Dril-Quip Asia Pacific PTE Ltd., located in Singapore; Dril-Quip do Brasil LTDA, located in Macae, Brazil; and DQ Holdings Pty. Ltd., located in Perth, Australia. Other subsidiaries include Dril-Quip (Ghana) Ltd. located in Takoradi, Ghana,Ghana; PT DQ Oilfield Services Indonesia located in Jakarta, Indonesia,Indonesia; Dril-Quip (Nigeria) Ltd. located in Port Harcourt, Nigeria,Nigeria; Dril-Quip Egypt for Petroleum Services S.A.E. located in Alexandria, Egypt,Egypt; Dril-Quip Oilfield Services (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. located in Tianjin, ChinaChina; and Dril-Quip Qatar LLC, located in Doha, Qatar. For additional discussion
On November 10, 2016, the Company acquired TIW Corporation (TIW), a Texas corporation, located in Houston, Texas, and all of
our geographic segments, please see Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.its subsidiaries. TIW manufactures consumable downhole products for the onshore and offshore global oil and gas market. TIW's subsidiaries include TIW Canada Ltd. located in Alberta, Canada; TIW de Mexico S.A. de C.V., located in Villahermosa, Mexico; TIW de Venezuela S.A., located in Anaco, Venezuela and with a registered branch located in Shushufindi, Ecuador; TIW (UK) Limited, located in Aberdeen, Scotland; TIW Hungary LLC, located in Szolnok, Hungary; and TIW International, Inc., which has a registered branch located in Singapore.
Dril-Quip markets its products through its offices and sales representatives located in the major international energy markets throughout the world. In
2015 and 2014,2016, the Company generated approximately
63%66% of its revenues from foreign sales compared to
67%63% in
2013.both 2015 and 2014.
The Company makes available, free of charge on its website, its Annual Report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q (in both HTML and XBRL formats), current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably
practicablepractical after it electronically files such reports with, or furnishes them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Company’s website address is www.dril-quip.com. Documents and information on the Company’s website, or on any other website, are not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K. Any materials the Company files with the SEC may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information concerning the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports the Company has filed with the SEC.
The Company also makes available free of charge on its website (www.dril-quip.com/govern.html) its:
Corporate Governance Guidelines,
Code of Business Conduct and Ethical Practices,
Audit Committee Charter,
Nominating and Governance Committee Charter, and
Compensation Committee Charter.
Any stockholder, who so requests, may obtain a printed copy of any of these documents from the Company. Changes in or waivers to
ourthe Company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethical Practices involving directors and executive officers of the Company will be posted on its website.
Overview and Industry Outlook
Both the market for
offshore drilling and production equipment and services and the Company’s business are substantially dependent on the condition of the oil and gas industry and, in particular, the willingness of oil and gas companies to make capital expenditures on exploration, drilling and production
operations offshore.operations. The level of capital expenditures has generally been dependent upon the prevailing view of future oil and gas prices, which are influenced by numerous factors affecting the supply and demand for oil and gas, including worldwide economic activity, interest rates and the cost of capital, environmental regulation, tax policies and the ability and/or desire of OPEC and other producing nations to set and maintain production levels and prices. The
price ofBrent crude oil
price reached a high of $115.19 per barrel in June 2014 and then began to drop sharply during the fourth quarter of 2014, ending the year at
$55.27.$55.27 per barrel. Crude oil prices continued to drop in 2015, reaching a low of $35.26
andper barrel in December
2015,2015. During the first quarter of 2016, the price per barrel reached a low of $26.01, before rebounding slightly to end the year at $54.96 per barrel. On November 30, 2016, OPEC met and decided
not to
reduce its 30cut production by approximately 1.2 million
barrels per day. The reduced production, if realized, is expected to keep oil prices over $50 per barrel
per day production quota. Production at this rate has produced a market oversupply causing prices to continue to decline amid softening demand and global economic weakness.during 2017. Capital expenditures are also dependent on the cost of exploring for and producing oil and gas, the availability, expiration date and price of
offshore leases, the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves,
in offshore areas, technological advances and alternative opportunities to invest in onshore exploration and production operations. Oil and gas prices and the level of
offshore drilling and production activity have historically been characterized by significant volatility.
DeclinesFuture declines in oil and gas prices may further adversely affect the willingness of some oil and gas companies to make capital expenditures on exploration, drilling and production operations,
offshore, which could have an adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Brent
Crudecrude oil prices per barrel for the current and previous two years are summarized below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Brent Crude Oil Prices | |
Year | | Low | | | High | | | Average | | | Dec. 31, | |
2013 | | $ | 96.84 | | | $ | 118.90 | | | $ | 108.56 | | | $ | 109.95 | |
2014 | | | 55.27 | | | | 115.19 | | | | 98.97 | | | | 55.27 | |
2015 | | | 35.26 | | | | 66.33 | | | | 52.32 | | | | 36.61 | |
We expect the
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Brent Crude Oil Prices |
| Year | Low | | High | | Average | | Dec. 31, |
| 2014 | $ | 55.27 |
| | $ | 115.19 |
| | $ | 98.97 |
| | $ | 55.27 |
|
| 2015 | 35.26 |
| | 66.33 |
| | 52.32 |
| | 36.61 |
|
| 2016 | 26.01 |
| | 54.96 |
| | 43.67 |
| | 54.96 |
|
The decrease in Brent
Crudecrude oil prices
over the past three years continues to have a significant effect on major integrated, large independent and foreign national oil and gas companies’ capital expenditure
budgets for 2016 and thereafter.budgets. The Company expects continued volatility in both crude oil and natural gas prices, as well as in the level of drilling and production related activities. Even during periods of high prices for oil and natural gas, companies exploring for oil and gas may cancel or curtail programs, seek to renegotiate contract terms, including the price of products and services, or reduce their levels of capital expenditures for exploration and production for a variety of reasons. A continued significant and prolonged decline in hydrocarbon prices would likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—A material or extended decline in expenditures by the oil and gas industry could significantly reduce our revenue and income.”
Recent Developments
On October 14, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Pearce Industries, Inc. to acquire all the outstanding common stock, par value $100.00 per share, of TIW Corporation for a cash purchase price of $142.7 million, which is subject to customary adjustments for cash and working capital. The acquisition closed on November 10, 2016. The acquisition of TIW
is expected to strengthen the Company's liner hanger sales and increase market share. Additionally, the acquisition of TIW gives Dril-Quip a presence in the onshore oil and gas market.
Dril-Quip’s revenues are generated from two sources: products and services. Product revenues are derived
primarily from the sale of offshore drilling and production equipment. Service revenues are earned when the Company provides technical advisory assistance and rental tools during installation and retrieval of the Company’s products. Additionally, the Company earns service revenues when rework and reconditioning services are provided. In
2015,2016, the Company derived
81%80% of its revenues from the sale of its products and
19%20% of its revenues from services compared to
81% and 19% in 2015 and 83% and 17% in 2014,
and 84% and 16% in 2013, respectively.
Dril-Quip designs, manufactures, fabricates, inspects, assembles, tests and markets subsea equipment, surface equipment and offshore rig equipment. The Company’s products are used
primarily to explore for oil and gas from offshore drilling rigs, such as floating rigs and jack-up rigs, and for drilling and production of oil and gas wells on offshore platforms, tension leg platforms (TLPs), Spars and moored vessels such as FPSOs. TLPs are floating production platforms that are connected to the ocean floor via vertical mooring tethers. A Spar is a floating cylindrical structure approximately six or seven times longer than its diameter and is anchored in place. FPSOs are floating production, storage and offloading monohull moored vessels.
The TIW products are used in the drilling and production for oil and gas both onshore and offshore.
Subsea Equipment. Subsea equipment is used in the drilling and production of offshore oil and gas wells around the world. Included in the subsea equipment product line are subsea wellheads, mudline hanger systems, specialty connectors and associated pipe, production riser systems, subsea production trees, liner hangers, safety valves, subsea control systems and subsea manifolds.
Subseawellheadsare pressure-containing vessels that are sometimes referred to as a “wellhead housing” and are made from forged and machined steel grade metal.steel. A casing hanger, also made of steel, lands inside the wellhead housing and suspends casing (pipe) downhole. As drilling depth increases, successively smaller diameter casing strings are installed, each suspended by an independent casing hanger. Subsea wellheads are utilized when drilling from floating drilling rigs, either semi-submersible or drillship types, or TLPs and Spars. The Company’s flagship subsea wellhead, called the SS-15® Subsea Wellhead System, is rated for 15,000 psi internal pressure and is offered to the industry in a variety of configurations. The Company’s newest wellhead product, the SS-20™TM BigBore™TM 11-H II-H Subsea Wellhead System, is designed to contain higher pressures (20,000 psi)pounds per square inch (psi)) and accommodate additional casing strings installed through a conventional marine drilling riser and a subsea blowout preventer.
Mudline hanger systems are used in jack-up drilling operations to support the weight of the various casing strings at the ocean floor while drilling a well. They also provide a method to disconnect the casing strings in an orderly manner at the ocean floor after the well has been drilled, and subsequently reconnect to enable production of the well by either tying it back vertically to a subsequently installed platform or by installing a shallow water subsea tree. Large diameter weld-onspecialty connectors (threaded or stab type) are used primarily in offshore wells drilled from floating drilling rigs, jack-up rigs, fixed platforms, TLPs and Spars. Specialty connectors join lengths of conductor or large diameter (16-inch or greater) casing. Specialty connectors provide a more rapid connection than other methods of connecting lengths of pipe. Connectors may be sold individually or as an assembly after being welded to sections of Company or customer supplied pipe. Dril-Quip’s weld-on specialty connectors are designed to prevent cross threading and provide a quick, convenient method of joining casing joints with structural integrity compatible with casing strength.
Production riser systems are generally designed and manufactured to customer specifications. Production risers provide a vertical conduit from the subsea wellhead up to a TLP, Spar or FPSO.FPSO floating at the surface.
Asubsea production tree is an assembly composed of valves, a wellhead connector, control equipment and various other components installed on a subsea wellhead or a mudline hanger system and used to control the flow of oil and gas from a producing well. Subsea trees may be eitherused as stand alone satellite typewells or multiple well template mounted and cluster arrangements. BothThese types typically produce via a subsea gathering system of manifolds and flowlines to a central control point located on a platform, TLP, Spar or FPSO. The use of subsea production trees has become an increasingly important method for producing wells located in hard-to-reach deepwater areas or economically marginal fields located in shallower waters. The Company is an established manufacturer of complicated dual-bore production trees, which are used in severe service applications.trees. In addition, Dril-Quip manufactures a patented single bore (SingleBore™(SingleBoreTM) subsea completion system which features a hydraulic valve mechanism instead of a
wireline-installed mechanism that allows the operator to plug the tubing hanger annulus remotely from the surface via a hydraulic control line and
subsequently unplug it when the well is put on production. This mechanism eliminates the need for an expensive multibore installation and workover riser, thereby saving both cost and installation time. Dril- Quip’s guidelinelessDril-Quip’s subsea production tree istrees are used in ultra-deepwater applications. This tree featuresThese trees feature remote multiple flowline and control connections, utilizing remotely operated intervention tools. The Company’s subsea production trees are generally custom designed and manufactured to customer specifications.
Aliner hanger is used to hang-off and seal casing into a previously installed casing string in the well bore, and can provide a means of tying back the liner for production to surface. Dril-Quip has developed a state-of-the-art liner hanger system and has installed its liner hangers in a number of difficult well applications, resulting in improved industry recognition and market opportunities. In addition to liner hanger systems that are well suited for onshore use, TIW offers expandable liner hanger systems that are typically utilized in challenging environments such as deepwater or High Pressure, High Temperature (HPHT) applications.
Asafety valve is used to provide a quick, sure shutoff in the drill string at the drill floor and prevent flow up the drill pipe. The TIW Kelly Valve is located in the drill string below the kelly, the uppermost component of the drill string, and is designed to be closed under pressure to remove the kelly.
A subsea control system provides control of subsea trees, manifolds, and other ocean floor process equipment and pipeline protection equipment. Dril-Quip has developed a variety of subsea control systems, including fiber optic based multiplex control systems that provide real time access to tree functions and tree equipment status. The control system can be packaged for shallow water or deepwater applications. Dril-Quip also manufactures control systems used in the installation, retrieval and workover of production equipment. Asubsea manifold is a structure located on the ocean floor consisting of valves, chokes, flowline connections and a control module used to collect and control the flow of oil and gas from subsea wells for delivery to a floating production unit or terminal.
Surface Equipment. Surface equipment is principally used for flow control on offshore production platforms, TLPs and Spars. Included in the Company’s surface equipment product line are platform wellheads, platform production trees and riser tensioners. Dril-Quip’s development of platform wellheads and platform production trees was facilitated by adaptation of its existing subsea wellhead and tree technology to surface wellheads and trees.
Platform wellheads are pressure-containing forged and machined metal housings in which casing hangers are landed and sealed at the platform deck to suspend casings. The Company emphasizes the use of metal-to-metal sealing wellhead systems with operational time-saving features which can be used in high pressure, high temperature and corrosive drilling and production applications. After installation of a wellhead,a platform production tree, consisting of gate valves, a surface wellhead connector, controls, tree cap and associated equipment, is installed on the wellhead to control and regulate oil or gas production. Platform production trees are similar to subsea production trees but utilize less complex equipment and more manual, rather than hydraulically activated,actuated, valves and connectors. Platform wellheads and platform production trees and associated equipment are designed and manufactured in accordance with customer specifications.
Riser tensioners are used on a floating drilling/production vessel to provide a continuous and reliable upward force on a riser string that is independent of the movement of the floating vessel.
Offshore Rig Equipment. Offshore rig equipment includes drilling riser systems, wellhead connectors and diverters. Thedrilling riser system consists of (i) lengths of riser pipe and associated riser connectors that secure one to another; (ii) the telescopic joint, which connects the entire drilling riser system to the diverter at top of the riser at the rig and provides a means to compensate for vertical motion of the rig relative to the ocean floor; and (iii) the wellhead connector, which provides a means for remote connection and disconnection of the drilling riser system to and from the blowout preventer stack. Thewellhead connector provides remote connection/disconnection of the blowout preventer stack production treeto or production riser to/from the wellhead.Diverters are used to provide protection from shallow gas blowouts and to divert gases off of the rig during the drilling operation. Wellhead connectors
are used on production riser systems and drilling riser
systemssystems. They are also used on both TLPs and Spars, which are
being installed
more frequently in deepwater applications. The principal markets for offshore rig equipment are new rigs, rig upgrades, TLPs and Spars. Drilling risers, wellhead connectors and diverters are generally designed and manufactured to customer specifications.
Certain products of the Company are used in potentially hazardous drilling, completion and production applications that can cause personal injury, product liability and environmental claims. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our business involves numerous operating hazards that may not be covered by insurance. The occurrence of an event not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.”
The Company provides services to customers, including technical advisory assistance and rental tools during installation and retrieval of the Company’s products. The Company also provides rework and reconditioning services on its customer-owned products. These services are provided from the Company’s worldwide locations and represented approximately
19%20% of revenues
in 2016 compared to 19% in 2015 and 17% in
2014 compared to 16% in 2013.2014.
Technical Advisory Assistance. Dril-Quip does not install products for its customers, but it does provide technical advisory assistance to the customer, if requested, in the installation of its products. The customer is not obligated to utilize these services and may use its own personnel or a third party to perform these services. Technical advisory assistance services performed by the Company are negotiated and sold separately from the Company’s products. These services are not a prerequisite to the sale of the Company’s products as its products are fully functional on a stand alone basis. The Company’s technicians provide assistance in the onsite installation of the Company’s products and are available on a 24-hour call out from the Company’s facilities located in Houston, Texas; Aberdeen, Scotland; Singapore; Macae, Brazil;Midland, Texas; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Youngsville, Louisiana; New Orleans, Louisiana; Perth, Australia;Villahermosa, Mexico; Nisku, Alberta, Canada; Anaco, Venezuela; Shushufindi, Ecuador; Macae, Brazil; Aberdeen, Scotland; Szolnok, Hungary; Stavanger, Norway; Esbjerg, Denmark; Port Harcourt, Nigeria; Tianjin, China; Alexandria, Egypt; Takoradi, Ghana; Tianjin, China; Doha, Qatar; Singapore; and Doha, Qatar.Perth, Australia.
Rental.The Company rents running and installation tools for use in installing its products. These tools are required to install and retrieve the Company’s products that are purchased by customers. Rental or purchase of running tools is not a condition of the sale of the Company’s products and is contracted for separately from product sales and other services offered by the Company. Running tools are available from Dril-Quip’s locations in Houston, Texas; Midland, Texas; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Youngsville, Louisiana; Villahermosa, Mexico; Nisku, Alberta, Canada; Anaco, Venezuela; Shushufindi, Ecuador; Macae, Brazil; Aberdeen, Scotland; Singapore; Macae, Brazil;Szolnok, Hungary; Stavanger, Norway; Esbjerg, Denmark; Beverwijk, Holland; Singapore; and Perth, Australia.
Reconditioning. The Company provides reconditioning of its customer-owned products at its facilities in Houston, Texas; Aberdeen, Scotland; Singapore; Macae, Brazil; Perth, Australia;Aberdeen, Scotland; Stavanger, Norway; Esbjerg, Denmark; Port Harcourt, Nigeria; Tianjin, China; Alexandria, Egypt; Takoradi, Ghana; Balikpapan, Indonesia; Tianjin, China; Doha, Qatar; Singapore; and Doha, Qatar.Perth, Australia. The Company does not typically service, repair or recondition its competitors’ products. Dril-Quip has major manufacturing facilities in Houston, Texas; Aberdeen, Scotland; Singapore; and Macae, Brazil.
TheSee “Item 2. Properties—Manufacturing Facilities.” Only the Houston facility
at Eldridge Parkway provides forged and heat treated products to
all of its major manufacturing facilities. Dril-Quip maintains its high standards of product quality through the implementation of Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) methodologies, as well as through the use of quality control specialists.
The Company’s Houston, Aberdeen, Singapore and Macae manufacturing plants are ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001 and ISO 9001:20089001 certified. The Houston, Aberdeen, Singapore and Macae plants are also licensed to applicable American Petroleum Institute (API) product specifications and are API Q1, 9th edition compliant. The Metallurgical Laboratory at the Houston operations is ISO 17025 certified. See “Item 2. Properties—Major Manufacturing Facilities.”certified for Crack Tip Opening Displacement, Hardness, Tensile and Charpy V-Notch testing. Dril-Quip works to maintain its high standards of product quality through the use of quality control specialistsprecision measuring equipment such as Gage Masters, Faro Arms, Coordinate Measuring Machine and the application of APQP. APQP entails concurrent engineering principles to identify and address potential quality concerns early in the product development process. The Company has the capability to manufacture various products from each of its product lines at its major manufacturing facilities and believes that this localized manufacturing capability is essential in order to compete with the Company’s major competitors. The Company’s manufacturing processes are vertically integrated, providing capability for the majority of its forging and heat treating and essentially all of its machining, fabrication, inspection, assembly and testing to be performed in-house. Dril-Quip recently added a Coordinate Measuring Machine and developed a certified Crack Tip Opening Displacement testing capability at its Houston operations to further improve responsiveness and support customers’ needs. The Company’s primary raw material is cast steel ingots, from which it produces steel shaped forgings at its forging and heat treatment facility in Houston, Texas. The Company routinely purchases steel ingots from multiple suppliers on a purchase order basis and does not have any long-term supply contracts. The Company’s Houston facility provides forgings and heat treatment for its Houston, Aberdeen, Singapore and Macae facilities. The Company’s major competitors depend on outside sources for all
or a substantial portion of their forging and heat treatment requirements. The Company has made significant capital investments in developing its vertically integrated manufacturing capability. Prolonged periods of low demand in the market for
offshore drilling and production equipment could have a greater effect on the Company than on certain of its competitors that have not made such large capital investments in their facilities.
Dril-Quip’s manufacturing facilities utilize state-of-the-art computer numerically controlled (CNC) machine tools and equipment, which contribute to the Company’s product quality and timely delivery. The Company has also developed a cost effective, in-house machine tool rebuild capability which produces “like new” machine upgrades with customized features to enhance the economic
manufacturemanufacturing of its specialized products. The Company purchases quality used machine tools as they become available and stores them at its facilities to be rebuilt and upgraded as the need arises. Rebuilding used machine tools allows for greater customization suitable for manufacturing Dril-Quip proprietary product lines. This strategy provides the added advantage of in-house expertise for repairs and maintenance of these machines. A significant portion of the Company’s manufacturing capacity growth has been through the rebuild/upgrade of quality used machine tools, including the replacement of outdated control systems with state-of-the-art CNC controls.
The Company’s principal customers are major integrated, large independent and foreign national oil and gas companies.
Offshore drillingDrilling contractors and engineering and construction companies also represent a portion of the Company’s customer base. The Company’s customers are generally oil and gas companies that are well-known participants in
offshore exploration and production.
The Company is not dependent on any one customer or group of customers.
In 2016, the Company’s top 15 customers represented approximately 75% of total revenues, and Chevron and its affiliated companies accounted for approximately 16% of total revenues. In 2015 and 2014, the Company’s top 15 customers represented approximately 61% of total revenues, and Chevron and its affiliated companies accounted for approximately 12% and 10%
, respectively, of total revenues. In 2013, the Company’s top 15 customers represented approximately 64% of total revenues,
and Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (“Petrobras”) and its affiliated companies accounted for approximately 11% of total revenues.respectively. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of total revenues in
2016, 2015
2014 or
2013.2014. The number and variety of the Company’s products required in a given year by any one customer depends upon the amount of that customer’s capital expenditure budget devoted to
offshore exploration and production and on the results of competitive bids for major projects. Consequently, a customer that accounts for a significant portion of revenues in one fiscal year may represent an immaterial portion of revenues in subsequent years. While the Company is not dependent on any one customer or group of customers, the loss of one or more of its significant customers could, at least on a short-term basis, have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.
Backlog consists of firm customer orders of Dril-Quip products for which a purchase order or signed contract has been received, satisfactory credit or financing arrangements exist and delivery is scheduled. Historically, the Company’s revenues for a specific period have not been directly related to its backlog as stated at a particular point in time. The Company’s product backlog was approximately
$318 million at December 31, 2016 and $685 million at December 31,
2015 and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2014.2015. The backlog at the end of
20152016 represents a decrease of approximately
$515$367 million, or
43%54%, from the end of
2014.2015. The Company’s backlog balance during
20152016 was
negatively impacted by purchase order cancellations and revisions totaling approximately $62 million and translation adjustments of approximately $35$1.3 million, due primarily to the strengtheningweakening of the British pound sterling against the U.S. dollar, versusand by approximately $113 million in cancellations, of which $52 million was attributable to the Brazilian real.cancellation of one contract during the first quarter of 2016 for wellhead equipment for a development project. In addition, the current decline incontinued depressed hydrocarbon prices and resulting business environment has resulted in a significant decrease in new customer orders.
The Company expects to fill approximately 60%70% to 70%80% of the December 31, 20152016 product backlog by December 31, 2016.2017. The remaining backlog at December 31, 20152016 consists of longer-term projects which are being designed and manufactured to customer specifications requiring longer lead times. In August 2012, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary, Dril-Quip do Brasil LTDA, was awarded a four-year contract by Petrobras, Brazil’s national oil company. The contract was valued at $650 million, net of Brazilian taxes, at exchange rates in effect at that time (approximately $340$407 million based on the December 31, 20152016 exchange rate of 3.903.26 Brazilian real to 1.00 U.S. dollar) if all the equipment under the contract was ordered. Amounts are included in the Company’s backlog as purchase orders under the contract are received. Revenues of approximately $106$129 million have been recognized on this contract through December 31, 2015.2016. As of December 31, 2015,2016, the Company’s backlog included $47$29 million of purchase orders under this Petrobras contract. The Company has not recognized revenue of approximately $9$11 million as of December 31, 20152016 for certain items of equipment that were completed but not yet accepted for delivery by Petrobras. If Petrobras does not ultimately accept these items for delivery or if they refuse to accept these or similar items completed in the future, the Company’s results of operations may be adversely affected. Following an interim amendment to extend the term of the contract pending the resolution of discussions, the Company entered into an amendment on October 17, 2016 to extend the duration of the contract until July 2020. As part of the amendment to the contract, Petrobras agreed to issue purchase orders totaling a minimum of approximately $30 million (based on current
exchange rates) before 2019. The Company
is in ongoing discussions with Petrobras regarding this contract and does not expectcannot provide assurance that Petrobras will order all of the equipment under the
contract during its current four-year term.contract. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our backlog is subject to unexpected adjustments and cancellations and is, therefore, an uncertain indicator of our future revenues and earnings.”
Dril-Quip markets its products and services throughout the world directly through its sales personnel in
twomultiple domestic and
twenty-one international locations. In addition, in certain foreign markets the Company utilizes independent sales agents or representatives to enhance its marketing and sales efforts.
Some of the locations in which Dril-Quip has sales agents or representatives are Trinidad,
Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. Although they do not have authority to contractually bind the Company, these representatives market the Company’s products in their respective territories in return for sales commissions. The Company advertises its products and services in trade and technical publications targeted to its customer base. The Company also participates in industry conferences and trade shows to enhance industry awareness of its products.
The Company’s customers generally order products on a purchase order basis. Orders, other than those considered to be long-term projects, are typically filled within
nine to twelve months after receipt,
of a purchase order, depending on the type of product and whether it is sold out of inventory or requires some customization. Contracts for certain of the Company’s larger, more complex products, such as subsea production trees, drilling risers and equipment for TLPs and Spars, can take a year or more to complete.
The primary factors influencing a customer’s decision to purchase the Company’s products are the quality, reliability and reputation of the product,
technologically superior featuresprice, technology, service and
price. Timely delivery of equipment is also very important to customer operations and the Company maintains an experienced sales coordination staff to help assure suchtimely delivery. For large drilling and production system orders, project management teams coordinate customer needs with the Company’s engineering, manufacturing and service organizations, as well as with subcontractors and vendors.
A portion of the Company’s business consists of designing, manufacturing and selling equipment, as well as offering technical advisory assistance during installation of the equipment, for major projects pursuant to competitive bids. The number of such projects in any year may fluctuate. The Company’s profitability on such projects is critically dependent on making accurate and cost effective bids and performing efficiently in accordance with bid specifications. Various factors, including availability of raw materials, changes in customer
requirements and governmental regulations, can adversely affect the Company’s performance on individual projects, with potential material adverse effects on project profitability.
Product Development and Engineering
The technological demands of the oil and gas industry continue to increase as offshore exploration and drilling expand into more hostile environments. Conditions encountered in these environments include water depths in excess of 10,000 feet, well pressures exceeding 15,000 psi, (pounds per square inch), well flowing temperatures beyond 350oF (Fahrenheit) and mixed flows of oil, gas and water that may also be highly corrosive and impact material properties. Since its founding in 1981, Dril-Quip has actively engaged in continuing development efforts to generate new products and improve existing products. When developing new products, the Company typically seeks to design the most technologically advanced version for a particular application to establish its reputation and qualification in that product. Thereafter, the Company leverages its expertise in the more technologically advanced product to produce less costly and complex versions of the product for less demanding applications. The Company also focuses its activities on reducing the overall cost to the customer, which includes not only the initial capital cost but also operating, installation and maintenance costs associated with its products.
In the 1980s, the Company introduced its first product, specialty connectors, as well as mudline suspension systems, template systems and subsea wellheads. In the 1990s, the Company introduced a series of new products, including diverters, wellhead connectors, SingleBore™SingleBoreTM subsea trees, improved severe service dual bore subsea trees, subsea and platform valves, platform wellheads, platform trees, subsea tree workover riser systems, drilling riser systems and TLP and Spar production riser systems. Since 2000, Dril-Quip has introduced multiple new products, including liner hangers, subsea control systems, subsea manifolds and riser tensioners. Historically, Dril-Quip’s product development work is primarily conducted at its facilities in Houston, TexasTexas; however, such activities have gradually increased in other regions, such as Aberdeen, Singapore and Aberdeen, Scotland.Brazil. In addition to the work of its product development staff, the Company’s application engineering staff provides technical services to customers in connection with the design and sales of its products. The Company’s ability to develop new products and maintain technological
advantages is important to its future success. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our business could be adversely affected if we do not develop new products and secure and retain patents related to our products.”
The Company believes that the success of its business depends more on the technical competence, creativity and marketing abilities of its employees than on any individual patent, trademark or copyright. Nevertheless, as part of its ongoing product development and manufacturing activities, Dril-Quip’s policy has been to seek patents when appropriate on inventions concerning new products and product improvements. All patent rights for products developed by employees are assigned to the Company and almost all of the Company’s products have components that are covered by patents.
In
2015, Dril-Quip completed2016, major production milestones were met for several key global projects. In the
engineering, manufacture, assembly and test of the first of 18North Sea, seven subsea completion trees
and associated installation equipment for a subsea field development project
in the North Sea. Further, the Company began the successful installation of the first of these subsea production systems, an event that represented a major production schedule milestone. Additionally, subseawere successfully installed. Subsea trees
were completed andpreviously delivered for
installation to a
subsea field development project off the coast of
Trinidad. The Company also began installationTrinidad were subsequently installed. Also, off the cost of
Dry Tree Production SystemsTrinidad, multiple deepwater subsea wellhead systems were installed with the support of a service facility in Trinidad; this is Dril-Quip's first aftermarket support presence in the region. With the completion of engineering, manufacturing, assembly and testing of dry tree equipment, Dril-Quip was able to support the
production startuptieback of
multiple wells for projects in the
first TLP in South America.Gulf of Mexico and off the coast of Malaysia. Engineering,
manufacture,manufacturing, assembly and test work continued on
several additional
Dry Tree Projectsdry tree projects in the
Company’sCompany's backlog. The requirements of the equipment in these projects represent significant technological challenges, the development of which is serving to enhance the
Company’sCompany's overall engineering capabilities.
In an ongoing test program, the Company continued the utilization of its recently constructed high-load horizontal test machine and fatigue test machine for rigorous validation testing of its existing specialty connector
product line. Active engineering programs have been initiated in-house to continue development in specialty connector product enhancements as well as new product development. Engineering development efforts are on-going in subsea production systems and capital equipment product lines.
In early 2016, the Company announced that it is establishing a research and development facility in Singapore that focuses on materials and products suitable for HPHT applications. The new facility, which is expected to open in late 2017, will serve as an additional hub for research and development activities for the Company.
Dril-Quip has numerous U.S. registered trademarks, including Dril-Quip®, Quik-Thread®, Quik-Stab®, Multi-Thread®, MS-15®, SS-15®, SS-10® and SU-90®. The Company has registered its trademarks in the countries where such registration is deemed material. Although in the aggregate, the Company’s patents and trademarks are of considerable importance to the manufacturing and marketing of many of its products, the Company does not consider any single patent or trademark or group of patents or trademarks to be material to its business as a whole, except the Dril-Quip® trademark. The Company also relies on trade secret protection for its confidential and proprietary information. The Company routinely enters into confidentiality agreements with its employees and suppliers. There can be no assurance, however, that others will not independently obtain similar information or otherwise gain access to the Company’s trade secrets. Dril-Quip faces significant competition from other manufacturers and suppliers of exploration and production equipment. Several of its primary competitors are diversified multinational companies with substantially larger operating staffs and greater capital resources than those of the Company and which, in many instances, have been engaged in the manufacturing business for a much longer period of time than the Company. The Company competes principally with GE Oil and Gas (formerly Vetco Gray) and the petroleum production equipment segments of
OneSubsea (a Schlumberger, Ltd.
/Cameron International Corporation joint venture),
FMC Technologies, Inc.TechnipFMC plc and Aker Solutions.
Because of their relative size and diversity of products, several of the Company’s competitors have the ability to provide “turnkey” services for
offshore drilling and production applications, which enables them to use their own products to the exclusion of Dril-Quip’s products. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—We may be unable to successfully compete with other manufacturers of drilling and production equipment.” The Company also competes to a lesser extent with a number of other companies in various products. The principal competitive factors in the petroleum drilling and production equipment markets are quality, reliability and reputation of the product, price, technology, service and timely delivery.
As of December 31, 2015, the total number of the Company's employees was 2,319, of which 1,246 were located in the United States. The total number of the Company’s employees as of December 31,
20152016 was
2,319.2,355, which includes the addition of 406 employees of TIW during the fourth quarter of 2016. Of these
1,2462,355, 1,193 were located in the United States.
As a result of additional worldwide reductions in force, the total number of employees as of February 24, 2017 was reduced to 2,179, an 7.5% reduction from December 31, 2016. In addition, reductions in pay have been instituted globally during the first quarter of 2017. Substantially all of the Company’s employees are not covered by collective bargaining agreements, and the Company considers its employee relations to be good.
The Company’s operations depend in part on its ability to attract quality employees. While the Company believes that its wage and salary rates are competitive and that its relationship with its labor force is good, a significant increase in the wages and salaries paid by competing employers could result in a reduction of the Company’s labor force, increases in the wage and salary rates paid by the Company or both. If either of these events were to occur, in the near-term, the profits realized by the Company from work in progress would be reduced and, in the long-term, the production capacity and profitability of the Company could be diminished and the growth potential of the Company could be impaired. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Loss of our key management or other personnel could adversely impact our business.”
Many aspects of the Company’s operations are affected by political developments and are subject to both domestic and foreign governmental regulations, including those relating to oilfield operations, the discharge of
materials into the environment from our manufacturing or other facilities, health and worker safety aspects of our operations, or otherwise relating to human health and environmental protection. In addition, the Company depends on the demand for its services from the oil and gas industry and, therefore, is affected by changing taxes, price controls and other laws and regulations relating to the oil and gas industry in general, including those specifically directed to onshore and offshore operations. The adoption of laws and regulations curtailing exploration and development drilling for oil and gas for economic or other policy reasons could adversely affect the Company’s operations by limiting demand for the Company’s products. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our operations and our customers’ operations are subject to a variety of governmental laws and regulations that may increase our costs, limit the demand for our products and services or restrict our operations.”
In recent years, increased concern has been raised over the protection of the environment. Legislation to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases has been introduced, but not enacted, in the U.S. Congress, and there has been a wide-ranging policy debate, both nationally and internationally, regarding the impact of these gases and possible means for their regulation. In addition, efforts have been made and continue to be made in the international community toward the adoption of international treaties or protocols that would address global climate change issues, such as the annual United Nations Climate Change Conferences. In November 2015, the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) was held in Paris with the objective to achieve a legally binding and universal agreement on climate, with the aim of keeping global warming below 2oC (Celsius), from all nations, regardless of size. The Paris Agreement, will be open for signingsigned by the U.S. on April 22, 2016, and, if it comes into force, would requirerequires countries to review and “represent a progression” in their intended nationally determined contributions, which set greenhouse gas emission reduction goals, every five years beginning in 2020.years. In November 2014, the United States and China agreed to new targets for carbon emissions reductions. Also, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has undertaken efforts to collect information regarding greenhouse gas emissions and their effects. Following a finding by the EPA that certain greenhouse gases represent a danger to human health, the EPA has expanded its regulations relating to those emissions and has adopted rules imposing permitting and reporting obligations. The results of the permitting and reporting requirements could lead to further regulation of these greenhouse gases by the EPA. Moreover, specific design and operational standards apply to U.S. outer continental shelf vessels, rigs, platforms, vehicles, structures and equipment.
The U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) regulates the design and operation of well control and other equipment at offshore production sites, among other requirements. BSEE has adopted stricter requirements for subsea drilling production equipment. In April 2015,2016, BSEE announcedpublished a proposedfinal blowout preventer systems and well control rule, which focuses on blowout preventer requirements and includes reforms in well design, well control, casing, cementing, real-time monitoring and subsea containment, among other things. In addition, offshore drilling in certain areas has been opposed by environmental groups and, in certain areas, has been restricted. For example, in December 2016, the Obama administration banned offshore drilling in portions of the Arctic and Atlantic oceans. To the extent that new laws or other governmental actions prohibit or restrict offshore drilling or impose additional environmental protection requirements that result in increased costs to the oil and gas industry in general and the offshore drilling industry in particular, the business of the Company could be adversely affected. The Company cannot determine to what extent its future operations and earnings may be affected by new legislation, new regulations or changes in existing regulations. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our business and our customers’ businesses are
subject to environmental laws and regulations that may increase our costs, limit the demand for our products and services or restrict our operations.”
Our operations are also governed by laws and regulations related to workplace safety and worker health, such as the Occupational Safety and Health Act and regulations promulgated thereunder.
Based on the Company’s experience to date, the Company does not currently anticipate any material adverse effect on its business or consolidated financial position as a result of future compliance with existing environmental, health and safety laws. However, future events, such as changes in existing laws and regulations or their interpretation, more vigorous enforcement policies of or by regulatory agencies, or stricter or different interpretations of existing laws and regulations, may require additional expenditures by the Company, which may be material.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Pursuant to Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K and General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the following information is included in Part I of this Form 10-K:
The following table sets forth the names, ages (as of February 20,
2016)2017) and positions of the Company’s executive officers:
|
| | | | | | | |
Name | | Age | | | Position |
Blake T. DeBerry | | | 56 | | 57 | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
James A. Gariepy | | | 58 | | 59 | Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
Jerry M. Brooks | | | 64 | | 65 | Vice President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
James C. Webster | | | 46 | | 47 | Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Blake T. DeBerry has been President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company since October 2011. Mr. DeBerry was Senior Vice President—Sales and Engineering from July 2011 until October 2011, and was Vice President—Dril-Quip Asia-Pacific (which covers the Pacific Rim, Asia, Australia, India and the Middle East) from March 2007 to July 2011. He has been an employee of the Company since 1988 and has held a number of management and engineering positions in the Company’s domestic and international offices. Mr. DeBerry holds a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from Texas Tech University.
James A. Gariepy is Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, a position he has held since October 2011. Mr. Gariepy was Senior Vice President—Manufacturing, Project Management and Service from July 2011 until October 2011, and was Vice President—Dril-Quip Europe (which covers Europe, Africa and Northern Eurasia) from March 2007 to July 2011. He has held domestic and international management positions since joining the Company in 2004. Mr. Gariepy holds a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from the Lawrence Technological University and an MBA from the University of St. Thomas.
Jerry M. Brooksis Vice President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer. He has been Vice President since 2007 and Chief Financial Officer since 1999. From 2009 until May 2011, he also served as Secretary of the Company. From 1992 until March 1999, Mr. Brooks served as Chief Accounting Officer. From 1980 to 1991, he held various positions with Chiles Offshore Corporation, most recently as Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer. Mr. Brooks holds a BBA in Accounting and aan MBA in Finance from the University of Texas at Austin.
James C. Webster is Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. He joined the Company in February 2011 as Vice President and General Counsel and was elected to the additional position of Secretary in May 2011. From September 2005 until September 2010, he was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of M-I SWACO, at the time, a joint venture between Smith International, Inc. and Schlumberger Ltd., and then was an area general counsel for Schlumberger from September 2010 to February 2011 following Schlumberger’s acquisition of Smith International. From 1999 to September 2005, he was an associate with, and later a partner in, the law firm of Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP in Houston. Mr. Webster holds an economics degree from the University of Arizona and a joint Law/MBA from Loyola University.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In this Item 1A.
, the terms “we,” “our,” “us” and “Dril-Quip” used herein refer to Dril-Quip, Inc. and its subsidiaries unless otherwise indicated or as the context so requires.
A material or extended decline in expenditures by the oil and gas industry could significantly reduce our revenue and income.
Our business depends upon the condition of the oil and gas industry and, in particular, the willingness of oil and gas companies to make capital expenditures on exploration, drilling and production
operations offshore.operations. The level of capital expenditures is generally dependent on the prevailing view of future oil and gas prices, which are influenced by numerous factors affecting the supply and demand for oil and gas, including:
worldwide economic activity;
the level of exploration and production activity;
interest rates and the cost of capital;
environmental regulation;
federal, state and foreign policies regarding exploration and development of oil and gas;
the ability and/or desire of OPEC and other major producers to set and maintain production levels and pricing;
governmental regulations regarding future oil and gas exploration and production;
the cost of exploring and producing oil and gas;
�� | • | | the cost of developing alternative energy sources; |
the cost of developing alternative energy sources;
the availability, expiration date and price of onshore and offshore leases;
the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves in onshore and offshore areas;
the success of drilling for oil and gas in unconventional resource plays such as shale formations;
alternative opportunities to invest in onshore exploration and production opportunities;
technological advances; and
weather conditions.
Oil and gas prices and the level of
offshore drilling and production activity have been characterized by significant volatility in recent years. Worldwide military, political and economic events have contributed to crude oil and natural gas price volatility and are likely to continue to do so in the future.
Brent crude oil prices per barrel for the current and previous two years are summarized below: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Brent Crude Oil Prices | |
Year | | Low | | | High | | | Average | | | Dec. 31, | |
2013 | | $ | 96.84 | | | $ | 118.90 | | | $ | 108.56 | | | $ | 109.95 | |
2014 | | | 55.27 | | | | 115.19 | | | | 98.97 | | | | 55.27 | |
2015 | | | 35.26 | | | | 66.33 | | | | 52.32 | | | | 36.61 | |
We expect continued volatility in both crude oil and natural gas prices, as well as in the level of drilling and production related activities. Even during periods of high prices for oil and natural gas, companies exploring for oil and gas may cancel or curtail programs, seek to renegotiate contract terms, including the price of our products and services, or reduce their levels of capital expenditures for exploration and production for a variety of reasons. These risks are greater during periods of low or declining commodity prices. Continued significant or prolonged declines in hydrocarbon prices have had, and may continue to have, a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We may not be able to satisfy technical requirements, testing requirements or other specifications under contracts and contract tenders.
Our products are used
primarily in deepwater, harsh environment and severe service applications. Our contracts with customers and customer requests for bids typically set forth detailed specifications or technical requirements for
our products and services, which may also include extensive testing requirements. We anticipate that such testing requirements will become more common in our contracts. In addition, recent scrutiny of the offshore drilling industry has resulted in more stringent technical specifications for our products and more comprehensive testing requirements for our products to ensure compliance with such specifications. We cannot assure you that our products will be able to satisfy the specifications or that we will be able to perform the full-scale testing necessary to prove that the product specifications are satisfied in future contract bids or under existing contracts, or that the costs of modifications to our products to satisfy the specifications and testing will not adversely affect our results of operations. If our products are unable to satisfy such requirements, or we are unable to perform any
required full-scale testing, our customers may cancel their contracts and/or seek new suppliers, and our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial position may be adversely affected.
We rely on technology provided by third parties and our business may be materially adversely affected if we are unable to renew our licensing arrangements with them.
We have existing contracts and may enter into new contracts with customers that require us to use technology or to purchase components from third parties, including some of our competitors. In the ordinary course of our business, we have entered into licensing agreements with some of these third parties for the use of such technology, including a license from a competitor of a technology important to our subsea wellheads. We may not be able to renew our existing licenses or to purchase these components on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we are unable to use a technology or purchase a component, we may not be able to meet existing contractual commitments without increased costs or modifications or at all. In addition, we may need to stop selling products incorporating that technology or component or to redesign our products, either of which could result in a material adverse effect on our business and operations.
We may be unable to successfully compete with other manufacturers of drilling and production equipment.
Several of our primary competitors are diversified multinational companies with substantially larger operating staffs and greater capital resources than ours and which have been engaged in the manufacturing business for a much longer time than us. If these competitors substantially increase the resources they devote to developing and marketing competitive products and services, we may not be able to compete effectively. Similarly, consolidation among our competitors could enhance their product and service offerings and financial resources, further intensifying competition.
The loss of a significant customer could have an adverse impact on our financial results.
Our principal customers are major integrated oil and gas companies, large independent and foreign national oil and gas companies
in offshore areas throughout the world.
Offshore drillingDrilling contractors and engineering and construction companies also represent a portion of our customer base.
In 2016, our top 15 customers represented approximately 75% of total revenues, and Chevron and its affiliated companies accounted for approximately 16% of total revenues. In 2015 and 2014, our top 15 customers represented approximately 61% of total revenues, and Chevron and its affiliated companies accounted for approximately 12% and 10%
, respectively, of total revenues. In 2013, our top 15 customers represented approximately 64% of total revenues,
and Petrobrasrespectively. No other customer accounted for
approximately 11%more than 10% of total
revenues.revenues in 2016, 2015 or 2014. While we are not dependent on any one customer or group of customers, the loss of one or more of our significant customers could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Our customers’ industries are undergoing continuing consolidation that may impact our results of operations.
The oil and gas industry is rapidly consolidating and, as a result, some of our largest customers have consolidated and are using their size and purchasing power to seek economies of scale and pricing concessions. This consolidation may result in reduced capital spending by some of our customers or the acquisition of one or more of our primary customers, which may lead to decreased demand for our products and services. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to maintain our level of sales to a customer that has consolidated or replace that revenue with increased business activity with other customers. As a result, the acquisition of one or more of our primary customers may have a significant negative impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. We are unable to predict what effect consolidations in the industry may have on price, capital spending by our customers, our selling strategies, our competitive position, our ability to retain customers or our ability to negotiate favorable agreements with our customers.
Increases in the cost of raw materials and energy used in our manufacturing processes could negatively impact our profitability.
Any increases in commodity prices for items such as nickel, molybdenum and heavy metal scrap that are used to make the steel alloys required for our products would result in an increase in our raw material costs. Similarly, any increase in energy costs would increase our product costs. If we are not successful in raising our prices on products to compensate for any increased raw material or energy costs, our margins will be negatively impacted.
We depend on third-party suppliers for timely deliveries of raw materials, and our results of operations could be adversely affected if we are unable to obtain adequate supplies in a timely manner.
Our manufacturing operations depend upon obtaining adequate supplies of raw materials from third parties. The ability of these third parties to deliver raw materials may be affected by events beyond our control. Any interruption in the supply of raw
materials needed to manufacture our products could adversely affect our business, results of operations and reputation with our customers.
Conditions in the global financial system may have impacts on our business and financial position that we currently cannot predict.
Uncertainty in the credit markets may negatively impact the ability of our customers to finance purchases of our products and services and could result in a decrease in, or cancellation of, orders included in our backlog or adversely affect the collectability of our receivables. If the availability of credit to our customers is reduced, they may reduce their drilling and production expenditures, thereby decreasing demand for our products and services, which could have a negative impact on our financial position. Additionally, unsettled conditions could have an impact on our suppliers, causing them to be unable to meet their obligations to us. Although we do not currently anticipate a need to access the credit markets in the short term, a prolonged constriction on future lending by banks or investors could result in higher interest rates on future debt obligations or could restrict our ability to obtain sufficient financing to meet our long-term operational and capital needs.
We are exposed to the credit risks of our customers, and a general increase in the nonpayment and nonperformance by customers could have an adverse impact on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business is subject to risks of loss resulting from nonpayment or nonperformance by our customers. Certain of our customers finance their activities through cash flow from operations, the incurrence of debt or the issuance of equity. In an economic downturn, commodity prices typically decline, and the credit markets and availability of credit can be expected to be constrained. Additionally, certain of our customers’ equity values could decline. The combination of lower cash flow due to commodity prices, a reduction in borrowing bases under reserve-based credit facilities and the lack of available debt or equity financing may result in a significant reduction in our customers’ liquidity and ability to pay or otherwise perform on their obligations to us. Furthermore, some of our customers may be highly leveraged and subject to their own operating and regulatory risks, which increases the risk that they may default on their obligations to us. Any increase in the nonpayment and nonperformance by our customers could have an adverse impact on our operating results and could adversely affect our liquidity.
Our backlog is subject to unexpected adjustments and cancellations and is, therefore, an uncertain indicator of our future revenues and earnings.
The revenues projected in our backlog may not be realized or, if realized, may not result in profits. All of the projects currently included in our backlog are subject to change and/or termination at the option of the customer. In the case of a change or termination, the customer is generally required to pay us for work performed and other costs necessarily incurred as a result of the change or termination.
We can give no assurance that our backlog will remain at current levels. Sales of our products are affected by prices for oil and natural gas, which have fluctuated significantly and may continue to do so in the future. Contracts denominated in foreign currency are also affected by changes in exchange rates, which may have a negative impact on our backlog. When drilling and production levels are depressed, a customer may no longer need the equipment or services currently under contract or may be able to obtain comparable equipment or services at lower prices. As a result, customers may exercise their termination rights or attempt to renegotiate contract terms. Continued declines in oil and natural gas prices could also reduce new customer orders, possibly causing a decline in our future backlog. If we experience significant project terminations, suspensions or scope adjustments to contracts reflected in our backlog, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely impacted.
Our international operations expose us to instability and changes in economic and political conditions and other risks inherent to international business, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
We have substantial international operations, with approximately
63%66% of our revenues from foreign sales in
2016 compared to 63% in both 2015 and
2014 compared to 67% in 2013.2014. We operate our business and market our products and services in many of the significant oil and gas producing areas in the world and are, therefore, subject to the risks customarily attendant to international operations and investments in foreign countries. Risks associated with our international operations include:
volatility in general economic, social and political conditions;
terrorist threats or acts, war and civil disturbances;
expropriation or nationalization of assets;
renegotiation or nullification of existing contracts;
foreign taxation, including changes in laws or differing interpretations of existing laws;
assaults on property or personnel;
restrictive action by local governments;
foreign and domestic monetary policies;
limitations on repatriation of earnings;
travel limitations or operational problems caused by public health threats; and
changes in currency exchange rates.
Any of these risks could have an adverse effect on our ability to manufacture products abroad or the demand for our products and services in some locations. To date, we have not experienced any significant problems in foreign countries arising from local government actions or political instability, but there is no assurance that such problems will not arise in the future. Interruption of our international operations could have a material adverse effect on our overall operations.
Our international operations expose us to compliance risks.
Doing business on a worldwide basis exposes us and our subsidiaries to risks inherent in complying with the laws and regulations of a number of different nations, including various anti-bribery laws. We do business and have operations in a number of developing countries that have relatively underdeveloped legal and regulatory systems compared to more developed countries. Several of these countries are generally perceived as presenting a higher than normal risk of corruption, or as having a culture in which requests for improper payments are not discouraged. Maintaining and administering an effective anti-bribery compliance program under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the United Kingdom’s Bribery Act of 2010 and similar statutes of other nations in these environments presents greater challenges than is the case in more developed countries.
In addition, our import and export activities are governed by unique customs laws and regulations in each of the countries where we operate. The laws and regulations concerning import and export activity, recordkeeping and reporting, import and export control and economic sanctions are complex and subject to frequent change.
The precautions we take to prevent and detect misconduct, fraud or non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations may not be able to prevent such occurrences, and we could face unknown risks or losses. Our failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations or acts of misconduct could subject us to fines, penalties or other sanctions, including debarment from government contracts, seizure of shipments and loss of import and export privileges, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
We are subject to taxation in many jurisdictions and there are inherent uncertainties in the final determination of our tax liabilities.
As a result of our international operations, we are subject to taxation in many jurisdictions.
Therefore,Accordingly, our effective income tax rate and other tax obligations in the
final determinationfuture could be adversely affected by a number of
ourfactors including changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax
rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities,
involvesdisagreements with taxing authorities with respect to the interpretation of
the statutestax laws and
requirements of taxing authorities worldwide. Foreignregulations and changes in tax laws. In particular, foreign income tax returns of foreign subsidiaries and related entities are routinely examined by foreign tax
authorities. Theseauthorities, and these tax examinations may result in assessments of additional taxes, interest or penalties. Refer to “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” regarding tax assessments in Brazil.
We regularly assess all of these matters to determine the adequacy of our tax provision, which is subject to discretion. If our assessments are incorrect, it could have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Moreover, the United States Congress, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and other government agencies in the other jurisdictions where we and our subsidiaries do business have had an extended focus on issues related to the taxation of multinational corporations. One example is in the area of "base erosion and profit shifting," where payments are made between affiliates from a jurisdiction with high tax rates to a jurisdiction with lower tax rates. As a result, the tax laws in the United States and other countries in which we and our subsidiaries do business could change on a prospective or retroactive basis, and such changes could adversely affect us.
Our excess cash is invested in various financial instruments which may subject us to potential losses.
We invest excess cash in various financial instruments including interest bearing accounts, money market mutual funds and funds which invest in U.S. Treasury obligations and repurchase agreements backed by U.S. Treasury obligations. However, changes in the financial markets, including interest rates, as well as the performance of the issuers, can affect the market value of our short-term investments.
We may suffer losses as a result of foreign currency fluctuations and limitations on the ability to repatriate income or capital to the United States.
We conduct a portion of our business in currencies other than the U. S. dollar, and our operations are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We cannot assure you that we will be able to protect the Company against such fluctuations in the future. Historically, we have not conducted business in countries that limit repatriation of earnings. However, as we expand our international operations, we may begin operating in countries that have such limitations. Further, we cannot assure you that the countries in which we currently operate will not adopt policies limiting repatriation of earnings in the future.
Our foreign subsidiaries also hold significant amounts of cash that may be subject to both U.S. income taxes (subject to adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes of the applicable foreign country if we dividend that cash to us, as we are located in the United States.
Our business involves numerous operating hazards that may not be covered by insurance. The occurrence of an event not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Our products are used in potentially hazardous drilling, completion and production applications that can cause personal injury, product liability and environmental claims. In addition, certain areas where our products are used, including in and near the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, are close to high population areas and subject to hurricanes and other extreme weather conditions on a relatively frequent basis. A catastrophic occurrence at a location where our equipment and/or services are used may expose us to substantial liability for personal injury, wrongful death, product liability, environmental damage or commercial claims. Our general liability insurance program includes an aggregate coverage limit of $200 million for claims with respect to property damage, injury or death and pollution. However, our insurance policies may not cover fines, penalties or costs and expenses related to government-mandated cleanup of pollution. In addition, our insurance does not provide coverage for all liabilities, and we cannot assure you that our insurance coverage will be adequate to cover claims that may arise or that we will be able to maintain adequate insurance at rates we consider reasonable. The occurrence of an event not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
We attempt to further limit our liability through contractual indemnification provisions with our customers. We generally seek to enter into contracts for the provision of our products and services that provide for (1) the responsibility of each party to the contract for personal injuries to, or the death of, its employees and damages to its property, (2) cross-indemnification with other contractors providing products and/or services to the other party to the contract with respect to personal injury, death and property damage and (3) the operator being responsible for claims brought by third parties for personal injury, death, property loss or damage relating to pollution or other well control events. We may not be able to successfully obtain favorable contractual provisions, and a failure to do so may increase our risks and costs, which could materially impact our results of operations. In addition, we cannot assure you that any party that is contractually obligated to indemnify us will be financially able to do so.
We may lose money on fixed-price contracts.
A portion of our business consists of the designing, manufacturing and selling of our equipment for major projects pursuant to competitive bids, and is performed on a fixed-price basis. Under these contracts, we are typically responsible for all cost overruns, other than the amount of any cost overruns resulting from requested changes in order specifications. Our actual costs and any gross profit realized on these fixed-price contracts may vary from the estimated amounts on which these contracts were originally based. This may occur for various reasons, including:
errors in estimates or bidding;
changes in availability and cost of labor and materials;
variations in productivity from our original estimates; and
material changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
These variations and the risks inherent in our projects may result in reduced profitability or losses on projects. Depending on the size of a project, variations from estimated contract performance could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.
Our business could be adversely affected if we do not develop new products and secure and retain patents related to our products.
Technology is an important component of our business and growth strategy, and our success as a company depends to a significant extent on the development and implementation of new product designs and improvements. Whether we can continue to develop systems and services and related technologies to meet
evolving industry requirements and, if so, at prices acceptable to our customers will be significant factors in determining our ability to compete in the industry in which we operate. Many of our competitors are large multinational companies that may have significantly greater financial resources than we have, and they may be able to devote greater resources to research and development of new systems, services and technologies than we are able to do.
Our ability to compete effectively will also depend on our ability to continue to obtain patents on our proprietary technology and products. Although we do not consider any single patent to be material to our business as a whole, the inability to protect our future innovations through patents could have a material adverse effect.
We may be required to recognize a charge against current earnings because of percentage-of-completion accounting.
Revenues and profits on long-term project contracts are recognized on a percentage-of-completion basis. We calculate the percent complete and apply the percentage to determine revenues earned and the appropriate portion of total estimated costs. Accordingly, purchase order price and cost estimates are reviewed periodically as the work progresses, and adjustments proportionate to the percentage complete are reflected in the period when such estimates are revised. To the extent that these adjustments result in a reduction or elimination of previously reported profits, we would have to recognize a charge against current earnings, which could be significant depending on the size of the project or the adjustment.
Loss of our key management or other personnel could adversely impact our business.
We depend on the services of Blake DeBerry, President and Chief Executive Officer, and James Gariepy, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Together, Mr. DeBerry and Mr. Gariepy have over
3540 years with the Company and approximately
6070 years of relevant industry experience. The loss of either of these officers could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
In addition, competition for skilled machinists, fabricators and technical personnel among companies that rely heavily on engineering and technology is intense, and the loss of qualified employees or an inability to attract, retain and motivate additional highly skilled employees required for the operation and expansion of our business could hinder our ability to conduct research activities successfully and develop and produce marketable products and services. A significant increase in the wages paid by competing employers could result in a reduction of our skilled labor force, increase in the wage rates paid by us or both. If either of these events were to occur, in the near-term, the profits realized by us from work in progress would be reduced and, in the long-term, our production capacity and profitability could be diminished and our growth potential could be impaired.
Acquisitions, dispositions and investments may not result in anticipated benefits and may present risks not originally contemplated, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
From time to time, we evaluate purchases and sales of assets, businesses or other investments. These transactions may not result in the anticipated realization of savings, creation of efficiencies, offering of new products or services, generation of cash or income or reduction of risk. In addition, acquisitions may be financed by borrowings, requiring us to incur debt, or by the issuance of our common stock. These transactions involve numerous risks, and we cannot ensure that:
any acquisition would be successfully integrated into our operations and internal controls;
the due diligence conducted prior to an acquisition would uncover situations that could result in financial or legal exposure;
the use of cash for acquisitions would not adversely affect our cash available for capital expenditures and other uses;
any disposition, investment, acquisition or integration would not divert management resources from the operation of our business; or
any disposition, investment, acquisition or integration would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Our operations and our customers’ operations are subject to a variety of governmental laws and regulations that may increase our costs, limit the demand for our products and services or restrict our operations.
Our business and our customers’ businesses may be significantly affected by:
federal, state, local and foreign laws and other regulations relating to the oilfield operations, worker safety and the protection of the environment;
changes in these laws and regulations;
levels of enforcement of these laws and regulations; and
interpretation of existing laws and regulations.
In addition, we depend on the demand for our products and services from the oil and gas industry. This demand is affected by changing taxes, price controls and other laws and regulations relating to the oil and gas industry in general, including those specifically directed to offshore operations. For example, the adoption of laws and regulations curtailing exploration and development drilling for oil and gas for economic or other policy reasons could adversely affect our operations by limiting demand for our products. We cannot determine the extent to which our future operations and earnings may be affected by new legislation, new regulations or changes in existing regulations and enforcement thereof.
Various new regulations intended to improve
particularly offshore safety systems and environmental protection have been issued since 2010 that have increased the complexity of the drilling permit process and may limit the opportunity for some operators to continue deepwater drilling in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, which could adversely affect the Company’s financial operations. Third-party challenges to industry operations in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico may also serve to further delay or restrict activities. If the new regulations, policies, operating procedures and possibility of increased legal liability are viewed by our current or future customers as a significant impairment to expected profitability on projects, they could discontinue or curtail their
offshore operations, thereby adversely affecting our financial operations by decreasing demand for our products.
Because of our foreign operations and sales, we are also subject to changes in foreign laws and regulations that may encourage or require hiring of local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. If we fail to comply with any applicable law or regulation, our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows may be adversely affected.
Our businesses and our customers’ businesses are subject to environmental laws and regulations that may increase our costs, limit the demand for our products and services or restrict our operations.
Our operations and the operations of our customers are also subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of human health and the environment. These environmental laws and regulations affect the products and services we design, market and sell, as well as the facilities where we manufacture our products. For example, our operations are subject to numerous and complex laws and regulations that, among other things, may regulate the management and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes; require acquisition of environmental permits related to our operations; restrict the types, quantities and concentrations of various materials that can be released into the environment; limit or prohibit operation
activities in certain ecologically sensitive and other protected areas; regulate specific health and safety criteria addressing worker protection; require compliance with operational and equipment standards; impose testing, reporting and record-keeping requirements; and require remedial measures to mitigate pollution from former and ongoing operations. We are required to invest financial and managerial resources to comply with such environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and anticipate that we will continue to be required to do so in the future. In addition, environmental laws and regulations could limit our customers’ exploration and production activities. These laws and regulations change frequently, which makes it impossible for us to predict their cost or impact on our future operations. For example, legislation to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases has been introduced, but not enacted, in the U.S. Congress, and there has been a wide-ranging policy debate, both nationally and internationally, regarding the impact of these gases and possible means for their regulation. In addition, efforts have been made and continue to be made in the international community toward the adoption of international treaties or protocols that would address global climate change issues, such as the annual United Nations Climate Change Conferences, including the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris (COP 21) in November 2015, which
resulted in the creation of the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement,
will be open for signingsigned by the U.S. on April 22, 2016,
and, if it comes into force, would requirerequires countries to review and “represent a progression” in their
intended nationally determined contributions, which set greenhouse gas emission reduction goals, every five
years beginning in 2020.years. Also, the EPA has undertaken efforts to collect information regarding greenhouse gas emissions and their effects. Following a finding by the EPA that certain greenhouse gases represent a danger to human health, the EPA has expanded its regulations relating to those emissions and has adopted rules imposing permitting and reporting obligations. The results of the permitting and reporting requirements could lead to further regulation of these greenhouse gases by the EPA.
To date,Subsequent to the Paris Agreement, there has been no significant legislative progress in cap and trade proposals or greenhouse gas emission reductions. The adoption of legislation or regulatory programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions could also increase the cost of consuming, and thereby reduce demand for, the hydrocarbons that our customers produce. Consequently, such legislation or regulatory programs could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. It is too early to determine whether, or in what form, further regulatory action regarding greenhouse gas emissions will be adopted or what specific impact a new regulatory action might have on us or our customers. Generally, the anticipated regulatory actions do not appear to affect us in any material respect that is different, or to any materially greater or lesser extent, than other companies that are our competitors. However, our business and prospects could be adversely affected to the extent laws are enacted or modified or other governmental action is taken that prohibits or restricts our customers’ exploration and production activities or imposes environmental protection requirements that result in increased costs to us or our customers.
Environmental laws may provide for “strict liability” for damages to natural resources or threats to public health and safety, rendering a party liable for environmental damage without regard to negligence or fault on the part of such party. Sanctions for noncompliance may include revocation of permits, corrective action orders, administrative or civil penalties and criminal prosecution. Some environmental laws and regulations provide for joint and several strict liability for remediation of spills and releases of hazardous substances. In addition, we may be subject to claims alleging personal injury or property damage as a result of alleged exposure to hazardous substances, as well as damage to natural resources. These laws and regulations also may expose us to liability for the conduct of or conditions caused by others, or for our acts that were in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations at the time such acts were performed. Any of these laws and regulations could result in claims, fines or expenditures that could be material to results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Our business could be adversely affected by a failure or breach of our information technology systems.
Our business operations depend on our information technology (IT) systems. Despite our security and back-up measures, our IT systems are vulnerable to computer viruses, natural disasters and other disruptions or failures. The failure of our IT systems to perform as anticipated for any reason or any significant breach of
security could disrupt our business and result in numerous adverse consequences, including reduced effectiveness and efficiency of our operations and those of our customers, inappropriate disclosure of confidential information, increased overhead costs, loss of intellectual property and damage to our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, we may be required to incur significant costs to prevent or respond to damage caused by these disruptions or security breaches in the future.
The market price of our common stock may be volatile.
The trading price of our common stock and the price at which we may sell common stock in the future are subject to large fluctuations in response to any of the following:
limited trading volume in our common stock;
quarterly variations in operating results;
general financial market conditions;
the prices of natural gas and oil;
announcements by us and our competitors;
our liquidity;
changes in government regulations;
our ability to raise additional funds;
our involvement in litigation; and
other events.
We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the near future.
We have not paid any dividends in the past and do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our Board of Directors review this policy on a regular basis in light of our earnings, financial position and market opportunities. We currently intend to retain any earnings for the future operation and development of our business as well as potential stock repurchases or acquisition opportunities.
Provisions in our corporate documents and Delaware law could delay or prevent a change in control of the Company, even if that change would be beneficial to our stockholders.
The existence of some provisions in our corporate documents and Delaware law could delay or prevent a change in control of our company, even if that change would be beneficial to our stockholders. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may make acquiring control of our company difficult, including:
provisions relating to the classification, nomination and removal of our directors;
provisions regulating the ability of our stockholders to bring matters for action at annual meetings of our stockholders;
provisions requiring the approval of the holders of at least 80% of our voting stock for a broad range of business combination transactions with related persons; and
the authorization given to our Board of Directors to issue and set the terms of preferred stock.
Our stockholder rights plan could also make it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or could discourage a third party from acquiring, our company or a large block of our common stock. In addition, the Delaware General Corporation Law imposes restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock.
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments |
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2. Properties
Manufacturing Facilities
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Location | | Building Size
(Approximate
Square Feet) | | | Land
(Approximate
Acreage) | | | Owned or Leased | |
Houston, Texas | | | | | | | | | | | | |
—Hempstead Highway | | | 175,000 | | | | 12.9 | | | | Owned | |
—N. Eldridge Parkway | | | 1,722,000 | | | | 218.0 | | | | Owned | |
Aberdeen, Scotland | | | | | | | | | | | | |
—Stoneywood South | | | 222,800 | | | | 24.1 | | | | Owned | |
—Birchmoss | | | 26,200 | | | | 0.7 | | | | Leased | |
Singapore | | | 293,200 | | | | 14.4 | | | | Leased | |
Macae, Brazil | | | 169,600 | | | | 10.6 | | | | Owned | |
Dril-Quip has manufacturing facilities in Houston, Aberdeen, Singapore and Macae. A majority of the
|
| | | | | | |
| Location | | Building Size
(Approximate
Square Feet) | | Land
(Approximate
Acreage) | | Owned or Leased |
| Houston, Texas | | | | | | |
| —Hempstead Highway | | 175,000 | | 12.9 | | Owned |
| —N. Eldridge Parkway | | 1,731,000 | | 218.0 | | Owned |
| —S. Main Street | | 127,000 | | 2.9 | | Owned |
| —Taylor Road | | 17,500 | | 0.4 | | Owned |
| Youngsville, Louisiana | | 36,100 | | 0.8 | | Owned |
| Alberta, Canada | | 20,000 | | 0.5 | | Owned |
| Aberdeen, Scotland | | | | | | |
| —Dyce | | 222,800 | | 24.1 | | Owned |
| —Birchmoss | | 26,200 | | 0.7 | | Leased |
| Singapore | | 293,200 | | 14.4 | | Leased |
| Macae, Brazil | | 169,600 | | 10.6 | | Owned |
The Company’s forging and heat treatment requirements are performed
byat the Houston
facility at Eldridge.Eldridge Parkway facility.
Sales, Service and Reconditioning Facilities
| | | | | | | | | | |
Location(1) | | Building Size
(Approximate
Square Feet) | | | Land
(Approximate
Acreage) | | | Activity |
New Orleans, Louisiana | | | 1,600 | | | | — | | | Sales/Service |
Beverwijk, Holland | | | 32,400 | | | | 0.8 | | | Sales/Warehouse |
Perth and Welshpool, Australia | | | 28,000 | | | | 2.9 | | | Sales/Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
Stavanger, Norway | | | 42,000 | | | | 6.1 | | | Sales/Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse/Fabrication |
Esbjerg, Denmark | | | 19,100 | | | | 2.6 | | | Sales/Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
Port Harcourt, Nigeria | | | 6,600 | | | | 0.1 | | | Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
Tianjin, China | | | 12,200 | | | | — | | | Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
Shekou, China | | | 600 | | | | — | | | Sales |
Cairo, Egypt | | | 2,200 | | | | — | | | Sales |
Balikpapan, Indonesia | | | 2,000 | | | | — | | | Reconditioning |
Alexandria, Egypt | | | 5,200 | | | | 0.6 | | | Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
Takoradi, Ghana | | | 2,500 | | | | 0.8 | | | Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
Doha, Qatar | | | 8,900 | | | | — | | | Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
(1) | All facilities are leased except Stavanger, Norway, which is owned. |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Location* | | Building Size
(Approximate
Square Feet) | | Land
(Approximate
Acreage) | | Activity |
| Odessa, Texas* | | 6,000 | | 0.1 | | Warehouse |
| Midland, Texas | | 10,000 | | 0.2 | | Sales/Service/Warehouse |
| New Orleans, Louisiana | | 1,600 | | — | | Sales/Service |
| Oklahoma City, Oklahoma* | | 6,000 | | 0.1 | | Sales/Warehouse |
| Calgary, Alberta, Canada | | 1,350 | | — | | Sales |
| Nisku, Alberta, Canada | | 12,500 | | 0.3 | | Sales/Service/Warehouse |
| Villahermosa, Mexico* | | 12,400 | | 0.3 | | Sales/Service/Warehouse |
| Anaco, Venezuela* | | 3,000 | | 0.1 | | Sales/Service/Warehouse |
| Quito, Ecuador | | 2,600 | | 0.1 | | Sales |
| Shushufindi, Ecuador | | 135,800 | | 3.1 | | Sales/Service/Warehouse |
| Szolnok, Hungary | | 4,300 | | 0.1 | | Sales/Service/Warehouse |
| Beverwijk, Holland | | 32,000 | | 0.7 | | Sales/Warehouse |
| Stavanger, Norway* | | 42,000 | | 6.1 | | Sales/Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse/Fabrication |
| Esbjerg, Denmark | | 19,100 | | 2.6 | | Sales/Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
| Takoradi, Ghana | | 2,500 | | 0.8 | | Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
| Port Harcourt, Nigeria | | 6,600 | | 0.1 | | Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
| Cairo, Egypt | | 2,200 | | — | | Sales |
| Alexandria, Egypt | | 5,200 | | 0.6 | | Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
| Balikpapan, Indonesia | | 2,000 | | — | | Reconditioning |
| Doha, Qatar | | 8,900 | | — | | Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
| Tianjin, China | | 12,200 | | — | | Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
| Shekou, China | | 600 | | — | | Sales |
| Perth and Welshpool, Australia | | 28,000 | | 2.9 | | Sales/Service/Reconditioning/Warehouse |
*These facilities are owned; all other facilities are leased.
The Company also performs sales, service and reconditioning activities at its facilities in Houston,
Youngsville, Alberta, Aberdeen, Singapore and Macae.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From 2002 to 2007, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary imported goods through the State of Espirito Santo in Brazil and subsequently transferred them to its facility in the State of Rio de Janeiro. During that period, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary paid taxes to the State of Espirito Santo on its imports. Upon the final sale of
these goods, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary collected taxes from customers and remitted them to the State of Rio de Janeiro net of the taxes paid on importation of those goods to the State of Espirito Santo in accordance with the Company’s understanding of Brazilian tax laws.
In August 2007, the State of Rio de Janeiro served the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary with assessments to collect a state tax on the importation of goods through the State of Espirito Santo from 2002 to 2007 claiming that these taxes were due and payable to it under applicable law. The Company settled these assessments with payments to the State of Rio de Janeiro of $12.2 million in March 2010 and $3.9 million in December 2010. Approximately $7.8 million of these settlement payments were attributable to penalties, interest and amounts that had expired under the statute of limitations so that amount was recorded as an expense. The remainder of the settlement payments generated credits (recorded as a long-term prepaid tax) to be used to offset future state taxes on sales to customers in the State of Rio de Janeiro, subject to certification by the tax authorities. During the second quarter of 2015, the tax authorities certified approximately $8.3 million of those credits paid in 2010 and granted an additional $2.3 million in inflation-related credits. The additional amount of credits granted by the tax authorities increased long-term prepaid taxes and decreased selling, general and administrative expenses by $2.3 million.
In December 2010 and January 2011, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary was served with two additional assessments totaling approximately $13.0 million from the State of Rio de Janeiro to cancel the credits associated with the tax payments to the State of Espirito Santo
(“Santo Credits”)(Santo Credits) on the importation of goods from July 2005 to October 2007. The Santo Credits are not related to the credits described above. The Company has objected to these assessments on the grounds that they would represent double taxation on the importation of the same goods and that the Company is entitled to the credits under applicable Brazilian law. With regard to the December 2010 assessment, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary filed an appeal with a State of Rio de Janeiro judicial court to annul the tax assessment following a ruling against the Company by the tax administration’s highest council. In connection with that appeal, the Company was required to deposit with the court approximately $3.1 million in December 2014 as the full amount of the assessment with penalties and interest. The Company
intends to filefiled a similar appeal in the judicial system with regard to the January 2011 assessment
as a result of a recent ruling againstand was required to deposit with the
Company by the tax administration’s highest council once that ruling is finalized.court approximately $5.7 million in December 2016. The Company believes that these credits are valid and that success in the judicial court process is probable. Based upon this analysis, the Company has not accrued any liability in conjunction with this matter.
Since 2007, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary has paid taxes on the importation of goods directly to the State of Rio de Janeiro and the Company does not expect any similar issues to exist for periods subsequent to 2007.
For a further description of the Company’s legal proceedings, see “Commitments and Contingencies,” Note
912 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company also is involved in a number of legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of such legal actions, in the opinion of management, the ultimate liability with respect thereto will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosure |
Not applicable.
PART II
| Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
The Company’s common stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DRQ. The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low sales prices of the common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange for the indicated quarters of fiscal years
20152016 and
2014. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Sales Price ($) | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | |
Quarter Ended | | High | | | Low | | | High | | | Low | |
March 31 | | $ | 81.13 | | | $ | 65.28 | | | $ | 112.86 | | | $ | 94.99 | |
June 30 | | | 81.78 | | | | 67.56 | | | | 116.53 | | | | 99.00 | |
September 30 | | | 75.48 | | | | 53.37 | | | | 110.23 | | | | 88.98 | |
December 31 | | $ | 68.69 | | | $ | 56.87 | | | $ | 93.54 | | | $ | 69.38 | |
2015.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Sales Price ($) |
| | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Quarter Ended | | High | | Low | | High | | Low |
| March 31 | | $ | 61.80 |
| | $ | 48.88 |
| | $ | 81.13 |
| | $ | 65.28 |
|
| June 30 | | 66.73 |
| | 56.24 |
| | 81.78 |
| | 67.56 |
|
| September 30 | | 59.89 |
| | 50.13 |
| | 75.48 |
| | 53.37 |
|
| December 31 | | $ | 69.40 |
| | $ | 46.90 |
| | $ | 68.69 |
| | $ | 56.87 |
|
There were approximately
130126 stockholders of record of the Company’s common stock as of December 31,
2015.2016. This number includes the Company’s employees and directors that hold shares, but does not include the number of security holders for whom shares are held in a “nominee” or “street” name.
The Company has not paid any dividends in the past and does not currently anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. The Company intends to reinvest any retained earnings for the future operation and development of its business, or to use for potential stock repurchases or acquisition opportunities. The Board of Directors will review this policy on a regular basis in light of the Company’s earnings, financial position and market opportunities.
Information concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is included in Note
1215 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Repurchase of Equity Securities
On February 26, 2015, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan under which the Company iswas authorized to repurchase up to $100 million of its common stock. In the fourth quarter ofDuring 2015, the Company repurchased and cancelled 572,700 shares at an average cost of $60.94 per share for a total cost of $34.9 million. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had repurchased and cancelled 1,184,700 shares at an average price of $63.98 for a total cost of $63.98$75.8 million. In the first six months of 2016, the Company repurchased and cancelled 400,500 shares at an average cost of $60.51 per share for a total cost of $75.8$24.2 million. As of June 30, 2016, the Company had repurchased and cancelled the maximum amount allowed under the February 26, 2015 authorization. The following table summarizes the repurchase and cancellation of common stock during 2016.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | Total Number
of Shares
Purchased | | Average
Price Paid
Per Share | | Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of a Publicly
Announced Plan or
Program | | Maximum Dollar
Value (in millions) of
Shares that
May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Program |
| April 2016 | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | 24.2 |
|
| May 2016 | | 345,600 |
| | 60.56 |
| | 345,600 |
| | 3.3 |
|
| June 2016 | | 54,900 |
| | 30.21 |
| | 54,900 |
| | — |
|
| Total | | 400,500 |
| | $ | 60.51 |
| | 400,500 |
| | $ | — |
|
On July 26, 2016, the
three months endedBoard of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase plan under which the Company can repurchase up to $100 million of its common stock. The repurchase plan has no set expiration date and any repurchased shares are expected to be cancelled. No repurchases have been made pursuant to this plan as of December 31,
2015. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number
of Shares
Purchased | | | Average
Price Paid
Per Share | | | Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of a Publicly
Announced Plan or
Program | | | Maximum Dollar
Value (in millions) of
Shares that
May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Program | |
October 1-31, 2015 | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | — | | | $ | 59.1 | |
November 1-30, 2015 | | | 288,900 | | | | 62.10 | | | | 288,900 | | | | 41.2 | |
December 1-31, 2015 | | | 283,800 | | | | 59.73 | | | | 283,800 | | | | 24.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 572,700 | | | $ | 60.94 | | | | 572,700 | | | $ | 24.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
2016.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report on Form 10-K.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Products | | $ | 685,364 | | | $ | 773,205 | | | $ | 731,617 | | | $ | 610,218 | | | $ | 511,650 | |
Services | | | 158,946 | | | | 157,752 | | | | 140,755 | | | | 122,813 | | | | 89,692 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 844,310 | | | | 930,957 | | | | 872,372 | | | | 733,031 | | | | 601,342 | |
Cost and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Products | | | 382,925 | | | | 428,125 | | | | 436,359 | | | | 384,513 | | | | 303,995 | |
Services | | | 76,361 | | | | 85,402 | | | | 77,547 | | | | 67,153 | | | | 57,853 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cost of sales | | | 459,286 | | | | 513,527 | | | | 513,906 | | | | 451,666 | | | | 361,848 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 88,044 | | | | 92,762 | | | | 94,806 | | | | 82,218 | | | | 70,510 | |
Engineering and product development | | | 48,145 | | | | 45,920 | | | | 40,115 | | | | 37,455 | | | | 34,626 | |
Special items | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,719 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 248,835 | | | | 278,748 | | | | 223,545 | | | | 161,692 | | | | 129,639 | |
Interest income | | | 948 | | | | 667 | | | | 587 | | | | 462 | | | | 418 | |
Interest expense | | | (12 | ) | | | (35 | ) | | | (35 | ) | | | (32 | ) | | | (53 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 249,771 | | | | 279,380 | | | | 224,097 | | | | 162,122 | | | | 130,004 | |
Income tax provision | | | 57,763 | | | | 70,668 | | | | 54,270 | | | | 42,913 | | | | 34,737 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 192,008 | | | $ | 208,712 | | | $ | 169,827 | | | $ | 119,209 | | | $ | 95,267 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per common share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 5.00 | | | $ | 5.22 | | | $ | 4.18 | | | $ | 2.96 | | | $ | 2.38 | |
Diluted | | $ | 4.98 | | | $ | 5.19 | | | $ | 4.16 | | | $ | 2.94 | | | $ | 2.36 | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 38,364 | | | | 39,964 | | | | 40,648 | | | | 40,332 | | | | 40,071 | |
Diluted | | | 38,531 | | | | 40,190 | | | | 40,865 | | | | 40,523 | | | | 40,322 | |
Statement of Cash Flows Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | | $ | 190,155 | | | $ | 149,313 | | | $ | 162,229 | | | $ | (8,159 | ) | | $ | 101,854 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (26,655 | ) | | | (41,571 | ) | | | (41,873 | ) | | | (48,999 | ) | | | (54,187 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | (73,565 | ) | | | (186,827 | ) | | | 3,367 | | | | 12,257 | | | | 5,098 | |
Other Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | $ | 30,477 | | | $ | 31,155 | | | $ | 29,340 | | | $ | 26,224 | | | $ | 23,013 | |
Capital expenditures | | | 27,079 | | | | 42,549 | | | | 42,633 | | | | 50,773 | | | | 56,213 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | |
| | | (In thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Working capital | | $ | 1,023,483 | | | $ | 928,498 | | | $ | 931,563 | | | $ | 769,299 | | | $ | 648,302 | |
Total assets | | | 1,428,250 | | | | 1,449,251 | | | | 1,396,805 | | | | 1,249,708 | | | | 1,094,715 | |
Total debt | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 57 | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 1,324,458 | | | | 1,245,192 | | | | 1,242,018 | | | | 1,066,432 | | | | 925,244 | |
Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| Statement of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenues: | | | | | | | | | |
| Products | $ | 433,012 |
| | $ | 685,364 |
| | $ | 773,205 |
| | $ | 731,617 |
| | $ | 610,218 |
|
| Services | 105,719 |
| | 158,946 |
| | 157,752 |
| | 140,755 |
| | 122,813 |
|
| Total revenues | 538,731 |
| | 844,310 |
| | 930,957 |
| | 872,372 |
| | 733,031 |
|
| Cost and expenses: | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of sales: | | | | | | | | | |
| Products | 268,405 |
| | 382,925 |
| | 428,125 |
| | 436,359 |
| | 384,513 |
|
| Services | 59,999 |
| | 76,361 |
| | 85,402 |
| | 77,547 |
| | 67,153 |
|
| Total cost of sales | 328,404 |
| | 459,286 |
| | 513,527 |
| | 513,906 |
| | 451,666 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | 53,143 |
| | 88,044 |
| | 92,762 |
| | 94,806 |
| | 82,218 |
|
| Engineering and product development | 44,325 |
| | 48,145 |
| | 45,920 |
| | 40,115 |
| | 37,455 |
|
| Operating income | 112,859 |
| | 248,835 |
| | 278,748 |
| | 223,545 |
| | 161,692 |
|
| Interest income | 3,037 |
| | 948 |
| | 667 |
| | 587 |
| | 462 |
|
| Interest expense | (28 | ) | | (12 | ) | | (35 | ) | | (35 | ) | | (32 | ) |
| Income before income taxes | 115,868 |
| | 249,771 |
| | 279,380 |
| | 224,097 |
| | 162,122 |
|
| Income tax provision | 22,647 |
| | 57,763 |
| | 70,668 |
| | 54,270 |
| | 42,913 |
|
| Net income | $ | 93,221 |
| | $ | 192,008 |
| | $ | 208,712 |
| | $ | 169,827 |
| | $ | 119,209 |
|
| Earnings per common share: | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 2.48 |
| | $ | 5.00 |
| | $ | 5.22 |
| | $ | 4.18 |
| | $ | 2.96 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 2.47 |
| | $ | 4.98 |
| | $ | 5.19 |
| | $ | 4.16 |
| | $ | 2.94 |
|
| Weighted average common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 37,537 |
| | 38,364 |
| | 39,964 |
| | 40,648 |
| | 40,332 |
|
| Diluted | 37,667 |
| | 38,531 |
| | 40,190 |
| | 40,865 |
| | 40,523 |
|
| Statement of Cash Flows Data: | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | 246,522 |
| | $ | 190,155 |
| | $ | 149,313 |
| | $ | 162,229 |
| | $ | (8,159 | ) |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (157,849 | ) | | (26,655 | ) | | (41,571 | ) | | (41,873 | ) | | (48,999 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (21,893 | ) | | (73,565 | ) | | (186,827 | ) | | 3,367 |
| | 12,257 |
|
| Other Data: | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | $ | 31,857 |
| | $ | 30,477 |
| | $ | 31,155 |
| | $ | 29,340 |
| | $ | 26,224 |
|
| Capital expenditures | 25,763 |
| | 27,079 |
| | 42,549 |
| | 42,633 |
| | 50,773 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | |
| Working capital | $ | 955,231 |
| | $ | 1,023,483 |
| | $ | 928,498 |
| | $ | 931,563 |
| | $ | 769,299 |
|
| Total assets | 1,461,404 |
| | 1,428,250 |
| | 1,449,251 |
| | 1,396,805 |
| | 1,249,708 |
|
| Total stockholders’ equity | 1,356,424 |
| | 1,324,458 |
| | 1,245,192 |
| | 1,242,018 |
| | 1,066,432 |
|
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected aspects of the Company’s financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income and cash flows during the periods included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto presented elsewhere in this report.
Dril-Quip designs, manufactures, sells and services highly engineered
offshore drilling and production equipment that is
primarily well suited for use in deepwater, harsh environment and severe service applications. The Company designs and manufactures subsea equipment, surface equipment and offshore rig equipment for use by major integrated, large independent and foreign national oil and gas companies
and drilling contractors primarily in offshore areas throughout the world. The Company’s principal products consist of subsea and surface wellheads, subsea and surface production trees, subsea control systems and manifolds, mudline hanger systems, specialty connectors and associated pipe, drilling and production riser systems, liner hangers, wellhead connectors and diverters. Dril-Quip also provides technical advisory assistance on an as-requested basis during installation of its products, as well as rework and reconditioning services for customer-owned Dril-Quip products. In addition, Dril-Quip customers may rent or purchase running tools from the Company for use in the installation and retrieval of the Company’s products.
Both the market for
offshore drilling and production equipment and services and the Company’s business are substantially dependent on the condition of the oil and gas industry and, in particular, the willingness of oil and gas companies to make capital expenditures on exploration, drilling and production
operations offshore.operations. Oil and gas prices and the level of
offshore drilling and production activity have historically been characterized by significant volatility. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—A material or extended decline in expenditures by the oil and gas industry could significantly reduce our revenue and income.”
During 2016, Brent crude oil prices averaged $43.67 per barrel compared to $52.32 per barrel in 2015 and $98.97 per barrel in 2014. According to the
Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the U.S. Department of Energy, Brent Crude oil prices per barrel are listed below for periods covered by this report: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Brent Crude Oil Prices | |
Year | | Low | | | High | | | Average | | | Dec. 31, | |
2013 | | $ | 96.84 | | | $ | 118.90 | | | $ | 108.56 | | | $ | 109.95 | |
2014 | | | 55.27 | | | | 115.19 | | | | 98.97 | | | | 55.27 | |
2015 | | | 35.26 | | | | 66.33 | | | | 52.32 | | | | 36.61 | |
According to the February 2016January 2017 release of the Short-Term Energy Outlook published by the EIA, Brent Crudecrude oil prices are projected to average $37.52$53.50 per barrel in 20162017 and $50.00$56.18 in 2017.2018. The International Energy Agency projected the global oil demand to growslow by 1.20.2 million barrels per day in 2016 to a total of 95.7 million barrels per day2017 based on its February 2016January 2017 Oil Market Report.
According to the EIA, between January
4, 20163, 2017 and February
5, 2016,10, 2017, the price of Brent
Crudecrude oil ranged from
$26.01$53.18 per barrel to
$36.28$55.94 per barrel, closing at
$32.35$55.20 per barrel on February
5, 2016.10, 2017.
Detailed below is the average contracted offshore rig count (rigs currently drilling as well as rigs committed, but not yet drilling) for the Company’s geographic regions for the years ended December 31,
2016, 2015
2014 and
2013.2014. The rig count data includes floating rigs (semi-submersibles and drillships) and jack-up rigs. The Company has included only these types of rigs as they are the primary assets used to deploy the Company’s products.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | Floating Rigs | | | Jack-up Rigs | | | Floating Rigs | | | Jack-up Rigs | | | Floating Rigs | | | Jack-up Rigs | |
Western Hemisphere | | | 115 | | | | 66 | | | | 125 | | | | 96 | | | | 129 | | | | 89 | |
Eastern Hemisphere | | | 85 | | | | 84 | | | | 100 | | | | 96 | | | | 94 | | | | 89 | |
Asia-Pacific | | | 39 | | | | 248 | | | | 54 | | | | 260 | | | | 50 | | | | 248 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 239 | | | | 398 | | | | 279 | | | | 452 | | | | 273 | | | | 426 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | Floating Rigs | | Jack-up Rigs | | Floating Rigs | | Jack-up Rigs | | Floating Rigs | | Jack-up Rigs |
| Western Hemisphere | 83 |
| | 43 |
| | 115 |
| | 66 |
| | 125 |
| | 96 |
|
| Eastern Hemisphere | 62 |
| | 65 |
| | 85 |
| | 84 |
| | 100 |
| | 96 |
|
| Asia-Pacific | 29 |
| | 221 |
| | 39 |
| | 248 |
| | 54 |
| | 260 |
|
| Total | 174 |
| | 329 |
| | 239 |
| | 398 |
| | 279 |
| | 452 |
|
Source: IHS—Petrodata RigBase—December 31, 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014
According to IHS-Petrodata RigBase, as of December 31, 2015,2016, there were 579461 rigs contracted for the Company’s geographic regions (151 floating rigs and 310 jack-up rigs), which represents a 20.4% decrease from the rig count of 579 rigs (217 floating rigs and 362 jack-up rigs), which represents as of December 31, 2015. The December 31, 2015 rig count represented a 19.3%19.2% decrease from the rig count on December 31, 2014 of 717 rigs (274 floating rigs and 443 jack-up rigs) as.
The Company believes that the number of rigs (semi-submersibles, drillships and jack-up rigs) under construction impacts its backlog and resulting revenues because in certain cases, its customers order some of the Company’s products during the construction of such rigs. As a result, an increase in rig construction activity tends to favorably impact the Company’s backlog while a decrease in rig construction activity tends to negatively impact the Company’s backlog. According to IHS-Petrodata RigBase, at the end of
2016, 2015
2014 and
2013,2014, there were
152, 198
228 and
233228 rigs, respectively, under construction. The expected delivery dates for the rigs under construction on December 31,
20152016 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Floating
Rigs | | | Jack-Ups | | | Total | |
2016 | | | 34 | | | | 89 | | | | 123 | |
2017 | | | 15 | | | | 29 | | | | 44 | |
2018 | | | 12 | | | | 6 | | | | 18 | |
2019 | | | 8 | | | | 2 | | | | 10 | |
After 2019 or unspecified delivery date | | | 2 | | | | 1 | | | | 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 71 | | | | 127 | | | | 198 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Floating
Rigs | | Jack-Ups | | Total |
| 2017 | 31 |
| | 80 |
| | 111 |
|
| 2018 | 9 |
| | 14 |
| | 23 |
|
| 2019 | 5 |
| | 4 |
| | 9 |
|
| 2020 | 3 |
| | 6 |
| | 9 |
|
| | 48 |
| | 104 |
| | 152 |
|
However, given the sustained low level of oil and gas prices and oversupply of offshore drilling rigs, the Company believes it is possible that delivery of some rigs under construction could be postponed or cancelled, decreasing the opportunity for supply of the Company's products.
The demand for the Company’s products and services is also affected by laws and regulations relating to the oil and gas industry in general, including those specifically directed to offshore operations. The adoption of new laws and regulations, or changes to existing laws or regulations that curtail exploration and development drilling for oil and gas for economic or other policy reasons, could adversely affect the Company’s operations by limiting demand for its products.
Oil and gas prices and the level of
offshore drilling and production activity have been characterized by significant volatility in recent years. Worldwide military, political, economic and other events have contributed to oil and natural gas price volatility and are likely to continue to do so in the future. Lower crude oil and natural gas prices have resulted in a trend of customers seeking to renegotiate contract terms with the Company, including reductions in the prices of its products and services, extensions of delivery terms and, in some
instances, contract cancellations or revisions. In some cases, a customer may already hold an inventory of the Company’s equipment, which may delay the placement of new orders. In addition, some of the Company’s customers could experience liquidity or solvency issues or could otherwise be unable or unwilling to perform under a contract, which could ultimately lead a customer to enter bankruptcy or otherwise encourage a customer to seek to repudiate, cancel or renegotiate a contract. An extended period of reduced crude oil and natural gas prices may accelerate these trends. If the Company experiences significant contract terminations, suspensions or scope adjustments to its contracts, then its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely impacted.
The Company expects continued volatility in both crude oil and natural gas prices, as well as in the level of drilling and production related activities. Even during periods of high prices for oil and natural gas, companies exploring for oil and gas may cancel or curtail programs, seek to renegotiate contract terms, including the price of products and services, or reduce their levels of capital expenditures for exploration and production for a variety of reasons. A continued significant and prolonged decline in hydrocarbon prices would likely have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.
The Company operates its business and markets its products and services in most of the significant oil and gas producing areas in the world and is, therefore, subject to the risks customarily attendant to international operations and investments in foreign countries. These risks include nationalization, expropriation, war, acts of terrorism and civil disturbance, restrictive action by local governments, limitation on repatriation of earnings, change in foreign tax laws and change in currency exchange rates, any of which could have an adverse effect on either the Company’s ability to manufacture its products in its facilities abroad or the demand in certain regions for the Company’s products or both. To date, the Company has not experienced any significant problems in foreign countries arising from local government actions or political instability, but there is no assurance that such problems will not arise in the future. Interruption of the Company’s international operations could have a material adverse effect on its overall operations.
The June 23, 2016 referendum by British voters to exit the European Union (Brexit) adversely impacted global markets, including currencies, and resulted in a decline in the value of the British pound sterling, as compared to the U.S. dollar and other currencies. Volatility in exchange rates could be expected to continue in the short term as the United Kingdom (U.K.) negotiates its exit from the European Union. A weaker British pound sterling compared to the U.S. dollar during a reporting period would cause local currency results of the Company's U.K. operations to be translated into fewer U.S. dollars. Continued adverse consequences such as deterioration in economic conditions and volatility in currency exchange rates could have a negative impact on the Company's financial position and results of operations. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our international operations expose us to instability and changes in economic and political conditions and other risks inherent to international business, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.”
Revenues. Dril-Quip’s revenues are generated from two sources: products and services. Product revenues are derived from the sale of offshore drilling and production equipment. Service revenues are earned when the Company provides technical advisory assistance and rental tools during installation and retrieval of the Company’s products. Additionally, the Company earns service revenues when rework and reconditioning services are provided. In 2015,2016, the Company derived 81%80% of its revenues from the sale of its products and 19%20% of its revenues from services compared to 81% and 19% in 2015 and 83% and 17% in 2014, and 84% and 16% in 2013, respectively. Service revenues generally correlate to revenues from product sales because increased product sales typically generate increased demand for technical advisory assistance services during installation and rental of running tools. The Company has substantial international operations, with approximately 63%66% of its revenues derived from foreign sales in 2016 and 63% in both 2015 and 2014 and 67% in 2013.2014. Substantially all of the Company’s domestic revenue relates to operations in the U. S. Gulf of Mexico. Domestic revenue approximated 37%34% of the Company’s total revenues for 2016 and 37% in both 2015 and 2014 and 33% in 2013.2014.
Product contracts are typically negotiated and sold separately from service contracts. In addition, service contracts are not typically included in the product contracts or related sales orders and are not offered to the customer as a condition of the sale of the Company’s products. The demand for products and services is generally based on
world-wideworldwide economic conditions in the
offshore oil and gas industry, and is not based on a specific relationship between the two types of contracts. Substantially all of the Company’s sales are made on a purchase order basis. Purchase orders are subject to change and/or termination at the option of the customer. In case of a change or termination, the customer is required to pay the Company for work performed and other costs necessarily incurred as a result of the change or termination.
Generally, the Company attempts to raise its prices as its costs increase. However, the actual pricing of the Company’s products and services is impacted by a number of factors, including global oil prices, competitive pricing pressure, the level of utilized capacity in the oil service sector, maintenance of market share, the introduction of new products and general market conditions.
The Company accounts for larger and more complex projects that have relatively longer manufacturing time frames on a percentage-of-completion basis. During
2016, there were 10 projects that were accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method, which represented approximately 14% of the Company’s total revenues and 17% of the Company’s product revenues. During 2015, there were 14 projects that were accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method, which represented
approximately 16% of the Company’s total revenues and 19% of the Company’s product revenues. During 2014, there were 17 projects that were accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method, which represented 11% of the Company’s total revenues and 13% of the Company’s product revenues.
During 2013, there were 21 projects that were accounted for using the percentage-of-completion method, which represented 15% of the Company’s total revenues and 18% of the Company’s product revenues. This percentageThese percentages may fluctuate in the future. Revenues accounted for in this manner are generally recognized based upon a calculation of the percentage complete, which is used to determine the revenue earned and the appropriate portion of total estimated cost of sales. Accordingly, price and cost estimates are reviewed periodically as the work progresses, and adjustments proportionate to the
percentpercentage complete are reflected in the period when such estimates are revised. Losses, if any, are recorded in full in the period they become known. Amounts received from customers in excess of revenues recognized are classified as a current liability. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—We may be required to recognize a charge against current earnings because of percentage-of-completion accounting.”
Cost of Sales. The principal elements of cost of sales are labor, raw materials and manufacturing overhead. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues is influenced by the product mix sold in any particular period, costs from projects accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method, over/under manufacturing overhead absorption and market conditions. The Company’s costs related to its foreign operations do not significantly differ from its domestic costs.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses include the costs associated with sales and marketing, general corporate overhead, business development expenses, compensation expense, stock-based compensation expense, legal expenses, foreign currency transaction gains and losses and other related administrative functions. The Company’s U.K. subsidiary, whose functional currency is the British pound sterling, conducts a portion of its operations in U.S. dollars. As a result, this subsidiary holds significant monetary assets denominated in U.S. dollars. These monetary assets
are subject to changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the British pound sterling, which has resulted in pre-tax non-cash foreign currency gains during the year ended December 31, 2016 totaling $31.8 million.
Engineering and Product Development Expenses. Engineering and product development expenses consist of new product development and testing, as well as application engineering related to customized products.
Income Tax Provision. The Company’s overall effective income tax rate has historically been lower than the statutory rate primarily due to foreign income tax rate differentials, research and development credits and deductions related to domestic manufacturing activities.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain consolidated statements of income data expressed as a percentage of revenues:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Products | | | 81.2 | % | | | 83.1 | % | | | 83.9 | % |
Services | | | 18.8 | | | | 16.9 | | | | 16.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 100.0 | | | | 100.0 | | | | 100.0 | |
Cost of sales: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Products | | | 45.4 | | | | 46.0 | | | | 50.0 | |
Services | | | 9.0 | | | | 9.2 | | | | 8.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cost of sales | | | 54.4 | | | | 55.2 | | | | 58.9 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 10.5 | | | | 10.0 | | | | 10.9 | |
Engineering and product development | | | 5.7 | | | | 4.9 | | | | 4.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 29.4 | | | | 29.9 | | | | 25.6 | |
Interest income | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 29.5 | | | | 30.0 | | | | 25.7 | |
Income tax provision | | | 6.8 | | | | 7.6 | | | | 6.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | | 22.7 | % | | | 22.4 | % | | | 19.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Revenues: | | | | | |
| Products | 80.4 | % | | 81.2 | % | | 83.1 | % |
| Services | 19.6 |
| | 18.8 |
| | 16.9 |
|
| Total revenues | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 100.0 |
|
| Cost of sales: | | | | | |
| Products | 49.8 |
| | 45.4 |
| | 46.0 |
|
| Services | 11.1 |
| | 9.0 |
| | 9.2 |
|
| Total cost of sales | 61.0 |
| | 54.4 |
| | 55.2 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | 9.9 |
| | 10.5 |
| | 10.0 |
|
| Engineering and product development | 8.2 |
| | 5.7 |
| | 4.9 |
|
| Operating income | 20.9 |
| | 29.4 |
| | 29.9 |
|
| Interest income | 0.6 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
|
| Income before income taxes | 21.5 |
| | 29.5 |
| | 30.0 |
|
| Income tax provision | 4.2 |
| | 6.8 |
| | 7.6 |
|
| Net income | 17.3 | % | | 22.7 | % | | 22.4 | % |
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a breakdown of our products and service revenues:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | (In millions) | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Products | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subsea equipment | | $ | 606.9 | | | $ | 684.4 | | | $ | 646.5 | |
Surface equipment | | | 25.6 | | | | 35.2 | | | | 35.8 | |
Offshore rig equipment | | | 52.9 | | | | 53.6 | | | | 49.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total products | | | 685.4 | | | | 773.2 | | | | 731.6 | |
Services | | | 158.9 | | | | 157.8 | | | | 140.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | $ | 844.3 | | | $ | 931.0 | | | $ | 872.4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (In millions) |
| Revenues: | | | | | |
| Products | | | | | |
| Subsea equipment | $ | 382.2 |
| | $ | 606.9 |
| | $ | 684.4 |
|
| Surface equipment | 16.7 |
| | 25.6 |
| | 35.2 |
|
| Offshore rig equipment | 34.1 |
| | 52.9 |
| | 53.6 |
|
| Total products | 433.0 |
| | 685.4 |
| | 773.2 |
|
| Services | 105.7 |
| | 158.9 |
| | 157.8 |
|
| Total revenues | $ | 538.7 |
| | $ | 844.3 |
| | $ | 931.0 |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015
Revenues. Revenues decreased by $305.6 million, or approximately 36.2%, to $538.7 million in 2016 from $844.3 million in 2015. The overall decrease in revenues was impacted by a 21.0% decrease in the average contracted offshore rig count (including floating and jack-up rigs) in 2016 as compared to 2015. Product revenues decreased by approximately $252.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of decreased revenues of $224.7 million in subsea equipment, $8.9 million in surface equipment and $18.8 million in offshore rig equipment. Product revenues decreased in the Western Hemisphere by $78.1 million, in Asia-Pacific by $46.3 million and in the Eastern Hemisphere by $128.0 million. The decreased revenues are largely due to the decline in oil and gas prices resulting in decreases in the demand for exploration and production equipment, especially subsea equipment. In any given time period, the revenues recognized between the various product lines and geographic areas will vary depending upon the timing of shipments to customers, completion status of the projects accounted for under the percentage-of-completion accounting method, market conditions and customer demand. Service revenues decreased by approximately $53.2 million resulting from decreased service revenues in the Western Hemisphere of $25.0 million, in the Eastern Hemisphere of $18.1 million and $10.1 million in Asia-Pacific. The decrease in service revenues is largely due to the decline in oil and gas prices leading to decreased exploration and production activities.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales decreased by $130.9 million, or 28.5%, to $328.4 million for 2016 from $459.3 million for the same period in 2015. As a percentage of revenues, cost of sales was approximately 61.0% in 2016 and 54.4% in 2015. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue increased in 2016 primarily as a result of unabsorbed manufacturing overhead costs.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. For 2016, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $34.9 million, or 39.7%, to $53.1 million from $88.0 million in 2015. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to decreases in personnel and related expenses of $4.1 million, a 5.9% decrease from 2015, acquisition and restructuring costs of $4.3 million compared to zero in 2015 and foreign currency gains of $31.8 million in 2016 as compared to gains of $5.0 million in 2015. The increase in the foreign exchange gain was caused by a 16.9% decline in the value of the British pound sterling against the U.S. dollar from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016. During 2015, the value of the British pound sterling declined only 5.1% against the U.S. dollar. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were 9.9% in 2016 and 10.5% in 2015.
Engineering and Product Development Expenses. For 2016, engineering and product development expenses decreased by approximately $3.8 million, or 7.9%, to $44.3 million from $48.1 million in 2015 primarily due to a reduction in payroll related expenses. Engineering and product development expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 8.2% in 2016 from 5.7% in 2015 largely due to the decrease in revenues.
Income Tax Provision. Income tax expense for 2016 was $22.6 million on income before taxes of $115.9 million, resulting in an effective income tax rate of approximately 19.5%. Income tax expense in 2015 was $57.8 million on income before taxes of $249.8 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of approximately 23.1%. The decrease in the effective income tax rate percentage primarily reflects the changes in taxable income among the Company’s three geographic areas, which have different income tax rates, research and development credits, foreign intellectual property tax benefits and deductions related to domestic manufacturing activities.
Net Income. Net income was approximately $93.2 million in 2016 and $192.0 million in 2015 for the reasons set forth above.
Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014
Revenues. Revenues decreased by $86.7 million, or approximately 9.3%, to $844.3 million in 2015 from $931.0 million in 2014. The overall decrease in revenues was impacted by a 12.9% decrease in the average contracted offshore rig count (including floating and jack-up rigs) in 2015 as compared to 2014. Product revenues decreased by approximately $87.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the same period in 2014 as a result of decreased revenues of $77.5 million in subsea equipment, $9.6 million in surface equipment and $0.7 million in offshore rig equipment. Product revenues decreased in the Western Hemisphere by $98.1 million and in Asia-Pacific by $19.4 million, partially offset by a $29.7 million increase in the Eastern Hemisphere. In any given time period, the revenues recognized between the various product lines and geographic areas will vary depending upon the timing of shipments to customers, completion status of the projects accounted for under the percentage-of-completion accounting method, market conditions and customer demand. Service revenues increased by approximately $1.1 million resulting from increased service revenues in the WesternHemisphere of $13.8 million, partially offset by decreases of $6.8 million in the Eastern Hemisphere and $5.9 million in Asia-Pacific. The majority of the increases in service revenues related to increased rental of the Company’s running and installation tools, partially offset by a decrease in technical advisory assistance.
Cost of Sales.Cost of sales decreased by $54.2 million, or 10.6%, to $459.3 million for 2015 from $513.5 million for the same period in 2014. As a percentage of revenues, cost of sales werewas approximately 54.4% in 2015 and 55.2% in 2014. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue decreased in 2015 primarily due to changes in the product mix and a reduction in unabsorbed manufacturing overhead expense.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.For 2015, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $4.8 million, or 5.2%, to $88.0 million from $92.8 million in 2014. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to decreases in personnel and related expenses of $5.2 million coupled with foreign currency gains of $5.0 million in 2015 as compared to gains of $4.5 million in 2014. The decrease was offset by an increase in stock-based compensation of $1.2 million to $13.1 million in 2015 from $11.9 million in 2014. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were 10.5% in 2015 and 10.0% in 2014.
Engineering and Product Development Expenses.For 2015, engineering and product development expenses increased by approximately $2.2 million, or 4.8%, to $48.1 million from $45.9 million in 2014. Personnel and related expenses increased by $2.0 million. Engineering and product development expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 5.7% in 2015 from 4.9% in 2014.
Income Tax Provision. Income tax expense for 2015 was $57.8 million on income before taxes of $249.8 million, resulting in an effective income tax rate of approximately 23.1%. Income tax expense in 2014 was $70.7 million on income before taxes of $279.4 million, resulting in an effective income tax rate of approximately 25.3%. The decrease in the effective income tax rate percentage primarily reflects the changes in taxable income among the Company’s three geographic areas, which have different income tax rates, research and development credits, foreign intellectual property tax benefits and deductions related to domestic manufacturing activities.
Net Income.Net income was approximately $192.0 million in 2015 and $208.7 million in 2014 for the reasons set forth above.Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013
Revenues. Revenues increased by $58.6 million, or approximately 6.7%, to $931.0 million in 2014 from $872.4 million in 2013. The overall increase in revenues was impacted by a 4.6% increase in the average contracted offshore rig count (including floating and jack-up rigs) in 2014 as compared to 2013. Product revenues increased by approximately $41.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 as a result of increased revenues of $37.9 million in subsea equipment and an increase of $4.3 million in offshore rig equipment, partially offset by a decrease of $0.6 million in surface equipment. The increase in subsea equipment revenue was primarily due to increased revenues of $24.1 million in subsea equipment in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico as numerous subsea equipment orders were completed and shipped. Product revenues increased by $10.2 million in the Western Hemisphere, $19.1 million in the Eastern Hemisphere and $12.3 million in Asia-Pacific. Service revenues increased by approximately $17.0 million resulting from increased service revenues in the Western Hemisphere of $2.2 million, $13.1 million in the Eastern Hemisphere and $1.7 million in Asia-Pacific. The majority of the increases in service revenues related to increased technical advisory assistance services and rental of the Company’s running and installation tools.
Cost of Sales.Cost of sales decreased by $0.4 million, or less than 1.0%, to $513.5 million for 2014 from $513.9 million for the same period in 2013. As a percentage of revenues, cost of sales were approximately 55.2% in 2014 and 58.9% in 2013. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue decreased in 2014 primarily due to pricing increases and changes in the product mix.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.For 2014, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by approximately $2.0 million, or 2.1%, to $92.8 million from $94.8 million in 2013. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily due to foreign currency translation gains of $4.5 million in 2014 as compared to losses of $6.0 million in 2013. The gains were partially offset by an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $11.9 million in 2014 as compared to $8.9 million in 2013. Personnel and related expenses totaled $86.0 million for 2014 as compared to $79.3 million for 2013. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were 10.0% in 2014 and 10.9% in 2013.
Engineering and Product Development Expenses.For 2014, engineering and product development expenses increased by approximately $5.8 million, or 14.5%, to $45.9 million from $40.1 million in 2013. The increase was primarily due to additional personnel required to meet the demands of the backlog related to long-term projects. Engineering and product development expenses as a percentage of revenues increased to 4.9% in 2014 from 4.6% in 2013.
Income Tax Provision. Income tax expense for 2014 was $70.7 million on income before taxes of $279.4 million, resulting in an effective income tax rate of approximately 25.3%. Income tax expense in 2013 was $54.3 million on income before taxes of $224.1 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of approximately 24.2%. The increase in the effective income tax rate reflects the $1.2 million Research and Development tax credit from the “American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012” recognized on the 2012 U.S. income tax return, but not recorded until 2013 for financial statement purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also contributing to the increased tax rate is the difference in income tax rates between the Company’s three geographic areas.
Net Income.Net income was approximately $208.7 million in 2014 and $169.8 million in 2013 for the reasons set forth above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash flows provided by (used in) operations by type of activity were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | (In thousands) | |
Operating activities | | $ | 190,155 | | | $ | 149,313 | | | $ | 162,229 | |
Investing activities | | | (26,655 | ) | | | (41,571 | ) | | | (41,873 | ) |
Financing activities | | | (73,565 | ) | | | (186,827 | ) | | | 3,367 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 89,935 | | | | (79,085 | ) | | | 123,723 | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash activities | | | (7,304 | ) | | | (6,566 | ) | | | 3,442 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 82,631 | | | $ | (85,651 | ) | | $ | 127,165 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Operating activities | $ | 246,522 |
| | $ | 190,155 |
| | $ | 149,313 |
|
| Investing activities | (157,849 | ) | | (26,655 | ) | | (41,571 | ) |
| Financing activities | (21,893 | ) | | (73,565 | ) | | (186,827 | ) |
| | 66,780 |
| | 89,935 |
| | (79,085 | ) |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash activities | (24,619 | ) | | (7,304 | ) | | (6,566 | ) |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | 42,161 |
| | $ | 82,631 |
| | $ | (85,651 | ) |
Statements of cash flows for entities with international operations that are local currency functional exclude the effects of the changes in foreign currency exchange rates that occur during any given year, as these are non-cash changes. As a result, changes reflected in certain accounts on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows may not reflect the changes in corresponding accounts on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The primary liquidity needs of the Company are (i) to fund capital expenditures to improve and expand facilities and manufacture additional running tools and (ii) to fund working capital. The Company’s principal source of funds is cash flows from operations.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $56.4 million in 2016 compared to 2015, primarily due to an increase in operating assets and liabilities of $154.8 million offset by lower net income of $98.8 million. Net cash provided by operating activities increased $40.8 million in 2015 compared to 2014, primarily due to increases in operating assets and liabilities of $57.1 million, offset by lower net income of $16.7 million.
Net
cash provided income decreased by operating activities decreased $12.9$98.8 million to $93.2 million in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to decreases2016 from $192.0 million in operating assets and liabilities of $54.4 million, offset by higher net income of $38.9 million and non-cash income adjustments of $2.6 million.
2015. Net income decreased by $16.7 million to $192.0 million in 2015 from $208.7 million in 2014. Net income increased by $38.9 million to $208.7 million in 2014 from $169.8 million in 2013. The reasons for the changes in net income are set forth in the “Results of Operations” section above.
The change in operating assets and liabilities of $112.7 million during 2016 primarily reflected a decrease in trade receivables of $106.5 million largely related to increased collection efforts and a decline in revenues. Prepaids and other assets decreased by $9.8 million due to decreases in vendor prepayments. Inventory decreased $7.9 million due to decreases in inventory for long-term projects. Accounts payable and accrued expenses increased by $11.4 million due to a $9.1 million increase in customer prepayments.
The change in operating assets and liabilities of $42.1 million during 2015 primarily reflected a decrease in trade receivables of $36.7 million and a decrease in inventory of $28.5 million. Trade receivables decreased primarily due to increased collection efforts and an overall downward shift of market activities. Inventory decreased due to lower balances in finished goods and an increase in the allowance for excess and slow-moving inventory. Prepaids and other assets increased by $17.9 million mostly from advances to suppliers related to long-term projects. Accounts payable and accrued expenses were lower by approximately $89.4 million which included a decrease of $52.8 million in customer prepayments.
The change
Net cash used in
operating assets and liabilities of $99.1 million during 2014 primarily reflected an increase in trade receivables of $102.7 million and an increase in inventory of $36.8 million. Trade receivablesinvesting activities increased due to the
growthacquisition of
revenues in 2014 and an increase in unbilled revenuesTIW. See Note 4 of
$15.1 million relatedthe Notes to
long-term projects. Inventory increased due to higher balances in raw materials and finished goods to accommodate the
backlog requirements related to long-term projects. Prepaids and other assets increased by $13.2 million mostly due from advances to suppliers related to long-term projects. Accounts payable and accrued expenses were higher by approximately $54.2 million which included an increaseConsolidated Financial Statements for details of
$26.2 million in customer prepayments.the purchase price allocation. Capital expenditures by the Company were $25.8 million, $27.1 million and $42.5 million in 2016, 2015 and $42.6 million in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. Capital expenditures in 2016, 2015 2014 and 20132014 included expanding worldwide manufacturing facilities as well as increased expenditures on machinery and equipment and running tools. The capital expenditures for 2016 were primarily $10.8 million for facilities, $6.0 million for machinery and equipment, $7.9 million for running tools and other expenditures of $1.1 million. Capital expenditures in 2015 were primarily $1.0 million for facilities, $12.7 million for machinery and equipment, $11.8 million for running tools and other expenditures of $1.6 million. Capital expenditures in 2014 were primarilycomprised of $3.0 million for facilities, $27.0 million for machinery and equipment, $8.3 million for running tools and other expenditures of $4.2 million. Capital expenditures in 2013 were comprised of $7.2 million for facilities, $23.6 million for machinery and equipment, $7.7 million for running tools and other expenditures of $4.1 million.
The exercise of stock options generated cash to the Company of $2.2 million in both 2016 and 2015 and $2.8 million in 2014. Under two separate share repurchase plans approved by its Board of Directors, the Company repurchased and $10.5cancelled 2,023,172 shares for a total cost of $190 million in 2015, 2014, and 2013 respectively.during 2014. On February 26, 2015, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase plan under which the Company was authorized to repurchase up to $100 million of its common stock. The Company repurchased 1,184,700 shares under this plan in 2015 for a total of $75.8 million. UnderDuring 2016, the Company repurchased 400,500 shares under this plan for a share repurchase plan approved by itstotal of $24.2 million. All repurchased shares were subsequently cancelled.
On July 26, 2016, the Board of Directors
in 2012, the Company repurchased 869,699 shares, atauthorized a
total cost of $90.0 million during 2014. On June 12, 2014 the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized anothernew stock repurchase plan under which the Company
was authorized tocan repurchase up to $100 million of its common stock. The
Companyrepurchase plan has no set expiration date and any repurchased
1,151,603 shares
underare expected to be cancelled. No repurchases have been made pursuant to this plan
in 2014 for a totalas of
$100.0 million. All repurchased shares were subsequently cancelled.December 31, 2016.
The following table presents long-term contractual obligations of the Company and the related payments in total and by year as of December 31,
2015: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Payments Due by Year | |
Contractual Obligations | | 2016 | | | 2017 | | | 2018 | | | 2019 | | | 2020 | | | After
2020 | | | Total | |
| | | (In millions) | |
Operating lease obligations | | $ | 3.2 | | | $ | 2.1 | | | $ | 1.8 | | | $ | 1.5 | | | $ | 1.3 | | | $ | 4.4 | | | $ | 14.3 | |
2016:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Payments Due by Year |
| Contractual Obligations | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | After 2021 | | Total |
| | | (In millions) |
| Operating lease obligations | | $ | 3.5 |
| | $ | 2.4 |
| | $ | 1.8 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 6.7 |
| | $ | 16.8 |
|
In addition to the above, the Company has issued purchase orders in the ordinary course of business for the purchase of goods and services. These purchase orders are enforceable and legally binding. However, none of the Company’s purchase obligations call for deliveries of goods or services for time periods in excess of one year.
The Company believes that cash generated from operations plus cash on hand will be sufficient to fund operations, working capital needs and anticipated capital expenditure requirements for the next twelve months. However, a continued depresseddepression, or a significant future decline, in hydrocarbon prices, catastrophic events or significant changes in regulations affecting the Company or its customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity. Should market
conditions result in unexpected cash requirements, the Company believes that borrowing from commercial lending institutions would be available and adequate to meet such requirements.
Backlog consists of firm customer orders of Dril-Quip products for which a purchase order or signed contract has been received, satisfactory credit or financing arrangements exist and delivery is scheduled. Historically, the Company’s revenues for a specific period have not been directly related to its backlog as stated at a particular point in time. The Company’s product backlog was approximately
$318 million at December 31, 2016 and $685 million at December 31,
2015 and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2014.2015. The backlog at the end of
20152016 represents a decrease of approximately
$515$367 million, or
43%54%, from the end of
2014.2015. In June 2016, the Company was awarded a contract valued at approximately $40 million to supply subsea drilling and production equipment and related services to Kangean Energy Indonesia, Ltd. for the development of its Terang/Sirasun/Batur gas fields project located offshore Indonesia. Of the $40 million contract, $29 million is related to equipment, which is included in the Company's backlog at December 31, 2016, and $11 million is related to services, which is not included in backlog. The Company’s backlog balance during
2015 has been2016 was negatively impacted by
purchase order cancellations and revisions totaling approximately $62$1.3 million
andin translation adjustments,
of approximately $35 million, due primarily to the
strengtheningweakening of
the British pound sterling against the U.S. dollar,
versusand by approximately $113 million in cancellations, of which $52 million was attributable to the
Brazilian real. In addition,cancellation of one contract during the
current decline in hydrocarbon prices and resulting business environment has resulted infirst quarter of 2016 for wellhead equipment for a
significant decrease in new customer orders.development project.
The Company expects to fill approximately
60%70% to
70%80% of the December 31,
20152016 product backlog by December 31,
2016.2017. The remaining backlog at December 31,
20152016 consists of longer-term projects which are being designed and manufactured to customer specifications requiring longer lead times. In August 2012, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary, Dril-Quip do Brasil LTDA, was awarded a four-year contract by Petrobras, Brazil’s national oil company. The contract was valued at $650 million, net of Brazilian taxes, at exchange rates in effect at that time (approximately
$340$407 million based on the December 31,
20152016 exchange rate of
3.903.26 Brazilian real to 1.00 U.S. dollar) if all the equipment under the contract is ordered. Amounts are included in the Company’s backlog as purchase orders under the contract are received. Revenues of approximately
$106$129 million have been recognized on this contract through December 31,
2015.2016. As of December 31,
2015,2016, the Company’s backlog included
$47$29 million of purchase orders under this Petrobras contract. The Company has not yet recognized revenue of approximately
$9$11 million as of December 31,
20152016 for certain items of equipment that were completed but not accepted for delivery by Petrobras. If Petrobras does not ultimately accept these items for delivery or if they refuse to accept these or similar items completed in the future, the Company’s results of operations may be adversely affected.
Following an interim amendment to extend the term of the contract pending the resolution of discussions, the Company entered into an amendment on October 17, 2016 to extend the duration of the contract until July 2020. As part of the amendment to the contract, Petrobras agreed to issue purchase orders totaling a minimum of approximately $30 million (based on current exchange rates) before 2019. The Company
is in ongoing discussions with Petrobras regarding this contract and does not expectcannot provide assurance that Petrobras will order all of the equipment under the
contract during its current four-year term.contract. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Our backlog is subject to unexpected adjustments and cancellations and is, therefore, an uncertain indicator of our future revenues and earnings.”
The Company’s operations are organized into three geographic segments—Western Hemisphere (including North and South America; headquartered in Houston, Texas), Eastern Hemisphere (including Europe and Africa; headquartered in Aberdeen, Scotland) and Asia-Pacific (including the Pacific Rim, Southeast Asia, Australia, India and the Middle East; headquartered in Singapore). Each of these segments sells similar products and services, and the Company has major manufacturing facilities in all three of its headquarter locations as well as in Macae, Brazil. Revenues for each of these segments are dependent upon the ultimate sale of products and services to the Company’s customers. For information on revenues by geographic segment, see Note
1013 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Revenues of the Western Hemisphere are also influenced by its sale of
products to the Eastern Hemisphere and Asia-Pacific segments. Accordingly, the operating incomes of each area are closely tied to third-party sales, and the operating income of the Western Hemisphere is also dependent upon its level of intercompany sales.
The Company has operations in various countries around the world and conducts business in a number of different currencies other than the U. S. dollar, principally the British pound sterling and the Brazilian real. Our significant foreign subsidiaries may also have monetary assets and liabilities not denominated in their functional currency. These monetary assets and liabilities are exposed to changes in currency exchange rates which may result in non-cash gains and losses primarily due to fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and each subsidiary’s functional currency.
The Company generally attempts to minimize its currency exchange risk by seeking international contracts payable in local currency in amounts equal to the Company’s estimated operating costs payable in local currency and in U.S. dollars for
the balance of the contracts.
Because of this strategy, the Company does not anticipate such exposure to be material in the future. The Company had, net of income taxes, transaction gains of
$25.6 million, $3.9 million and $3.4 million in
2016, 2015 and 2014,
respectively, and transaction losses of $4.6 million in 2013.respectively. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to protect itself against such fluctuations in the future.
Historically, the Company has not conducted business in countries that limit repatriation of earnings. However, as the Company expands its international operations, it may begin operating in countries that have such limitations. Further, there can be no assurance that the countries in which the Company currently operates will not adopt policies limiting repatriation of earnings in the future. The Company also has significant investments in countries other than the United States, principally its manufacturing operations in Scotland, Singapore, Brazil and, to a lesser extent, Norway. The functional currency of these foreign operations is the local currency except for Singapore, where the U.S. dollar is used. Financial statement assets and liabilities in the functional currency are translated at the end of the period exchange rates. Resulting translation adjustments are reflected as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and have no current effect on earnings or cash flow.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates. The Company believes the following accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
The Company recognizes product revenues from two methods:
product revenues recognized under the percentage-of-completion method; and
product revenues from the sale of products that do not qualify for the percentage-of-completion method.
Revenues recognized under the percentage-of-completion method
The Company uses the percentage-of-completion method on long-term contracts that have the following characteristics:
the contracts call for products which are designed to customer specifications;
the structural designs are unique and require significant engineering and manufacturing efforts generally requiring more than one year in duration;
the contracts contain specific terms as to milestones, progress billings and delivery dates; and
product requirements cannot be filled directly from the Company’s standard inventory.
For each project, the Company prepares a detailed analysis of estimated costs, profit margin, completion date and risk factors which include availability of material, production efficiencies and other factors that may impact the project. On a quarterly basis, management reviews the progress of each project, which may result in revisions of previous estimates, including revenue recognition. The Company calculates the percent complete and applies the percentage to determine the revenues earned and the appropriate portion of total estimated costs. Losses, if any, are recorded in full in the period they become known. Historically, the Company’s estimates of total costs and costs to complete have approximated actual costs incurred to complete the project.
Under the percentage-of-completion method, billings
domay not
always correlate directly to the revenue recognized. Based upon the terms of the specific contract, billings may be in excess of the revenue recognized, in which case the amounts are included in customer prepayments as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Likewise, revenue recognized may exceed customer billings in which case the amounts are reported in trade receivables. Unbilled revenues are expected to be billed and collected within one year. At December 31,
20152016 and
2014,2015, receivables included
$70.8$56.8 million and
$68.0$70.8 million of unbilled receivables, respectively. For the year ended December 31,
2015,2016, there were
10 projects representing approximately 14% of the Company’s total revenues and approximately 17% of its product revenues, and 14 projects
during 2015 representing approximately 16% of the Company’s total revenues and approximately 19% of its product revenues,
and 17 projects during 2014 representing approximately 11% of the Company’s total revenues and approximately 13% of its product revenues, which were accounted for using percentage-of-completion accounting.
Revenues not recognized under the percentage-of-completion method
Revenues from the sale of inventory products, not accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method, are recorded at the time the manufacturing processes are complete and ownership is transferred to the customer.
The Company earns service revenues from three sources:
technical advisory assistance;
rental of running tools; and
rework and reconditioning of customer-owned Dril-Quip products.
The Company does not install products for its customers, but it provides technical advisory assistance. At the time of delivery of the product, the customer is not obligated to buy or rent the Company’s running tools and the Company is not obligated to perform any subsequent services relating to installation. Technical advisory assistance service revenue is recorded at the time the service is rendered. Service revenues associated with the rental of running and installation tools are recorded as earned. Rework and reconditioning service revenues are recorded when the refurbishment process is complete.
The Company normally negotiates contracts for products, including those accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method, and services separately. For all product sales, it is the customer’s decision as to the timing of the product installation as well as whether Dril-Quip running tools will be purchased or rented. Furthermore, the customer is under no obligation to utilize the Company’s technical advisory assistance services. The customer may use a third party or their own personnel.
Inventories. Inventory costs are determined principally by the use of the first-in, first-out (FIFO) costing method and are stated at the lower of cost or market. Company manufactured inventory is valued principally using standard costs, which are calculated based upon direct costs incurred and overhead allocations and approximate actual costs. Inventory purchased from third-party vendors is principally valued at the weighted average cost. Periodically, obsolescence reviews are performed on slow-moving inventories and reserves are established based on current assessments about future demands and market conditions. The inventory values have been reduced by a reserve for excess and slow-moving inventories of $39.2$45.6 million and $34.6$39.2 million as of December 31, 20152016 and 2014,2015, respectively. If market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory reserves may be required.
Contingent Liabilities. The Company establishes reserves for estimated loss contingencies when the Company believes a loss is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Revisions to contingent liabilities are reflected in net income in the period in which different or additional facts or information become known or circumstances change that affect the Company’s previous assumptions with respect to the likelihood or amount of loss. Reserves for contingent liabilities are based upon the Company’s assumptions and estimates regarding the probable outcome of the matter. Should the outcome differ from the Company’s assumptions and estimates, revisions to the estimated reserves for contingent liabilities would be required. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no derivative instruments and no off-balance sheet hedging or financing arrangements, contracts or operations.
New Accounting Standards
In November 2015,
The information set forth under Note 3 of Notes to the FASB issued ASU 2015-17 “Income Taxes (Topic 740).” In an effort to reduce complexity,Consolidated Financial Statements under the requirement to separate deferred income tax liabilitiescaption "New Accounting Standards" is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7A. Quantitative and
assets into current and noncurrent amounts will no longer be necessary. In the future, all deferred income taxes will be considered noncurrent and will continue to be offset into a single amount within each country. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company’s financial statements will be revised to reflect this amendment beginning in the first quarter of 2017.In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11 “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330).” This standard states that inventory within the scope of this update should be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling price in the normal course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The amendment applies a new five-step revenue recognition model to be used in recognizing revenues associated with customer contracts. The amendment requires disclosure sufficient to enable readers of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, including qualitative and quantitative disclosures, significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill the contract. The standard’s effective date was originally for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. On
April 1, 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company is currently exposed to certain market risks related to interest rate changes on its short-term investments and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company does not engage in any material hedging transactions, forward contracts or currency trading which could mitigate the market risks inherent in such transactions. There have been no material changes in market risks for the Company from December 31,
2014.2015.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Through its subsidiaries, the Company conducts a portion of its business in currencies other than the United States dollar, principally the British pound sterling and the Brazilian real. The Company has not experienced significant transaction gains or losses associated with changes in currency exchange rates and does not anticipate such exposure to be material in the future. However, thereThere is no assurance that the Company will be able to protect
itself against currency fluctuations in the future. In periods where the dollar is strong as compared to other currencies, it is possible that foreign sales may reflect a decline in profits due to translation. It does not appear the Company’s sales have experienced significant profit declines. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Currency Risk” in Item 7 of this report.
The Company uses a sensitivity analysis model to measure the potential impact on revenue and net income of a 10% adverse movement of foreign currency exchange rates for the British pound sterling and the Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar over the previous year. Based upon this model, a 10% decrease would have resulted in a decrease in revenues of approximately
$35.5$17.6 million and a decrease in net income of approximately
$13.5$3.6 million for
2015.2016. There can be no assurance that the exchange rate decrease projected above will materialize as fluctuations in exchange rates are beyond the Company’s control.
Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Management has designed its internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officers and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework inInternal Control—Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework inInternal Control—Integrated Framework(2013), our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015.2016.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm, who audited the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has also audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting,
andas stated in their report
is set forth on page 45.which appears herein.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dril-Quip, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2015 2016and December 31, 2014,2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the twothree years in the period ended December 31, 2015 2016in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedulelisted in the accompanying index appearing under Item 15(a)(2)presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’sCompany's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
February
25, 2016Report27, 2017
Table of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmBoard of Directors and Stockholders
Dril-Quip, Inc.
Houston, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Dril-Quip, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2013. In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31, 2013 listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and schedule based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Dril-Quip, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Also in our opinion, the financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31, 2013, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ BDO USA, LLP
Houston, Texas
February 26, 2014
Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | (In thousands, except per share data) | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Products | | $ | 685,364 | | | $ | 773,205 | | | $ | 731,617 | |
Services | | | 158,946 | | | | 157,752 | | | | 140,755 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues | | | 844,310 | | | | 930,957 | | | | 872,372 | |
Cost and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Products | | | 382,925 | | | | 428,125 | | | | 436,359 | |
Services | | | 76,361 | | | | 85,402 | | | | 77,547 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total cost of sales | | | 459,286 | | | | 513,527 | | | | 513,906 | |
Selling, general and administrative | | | 88,044 | | | | 92,762 | | | | 94,806 | |
Engineering and product development | | | 48,145 | | | | 45,920 | | | | 40,115 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total costs and expenses | | | 595,475 | | | | 652,209 | | | | 648,827 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | | | 248,835 | | | | 278,748 | | | | 223,545 | |
Interest income | | | 948 | | | | 667 | | | | 587 | |
Interest expense | | | (12 | ) | | | (35 | ) | | | (35 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | | | 249,771 | | | | 279,380 | | | | 224,097 | |
Income tax provision | | | 57,763 | | | | 70,668 | | | | 54,270 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 192,008 | | | $ | 208,712 | | | $ | 169,827 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per common share: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 5.00 | | | $ | 5.22 | | | $ | 4.18 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | $ | 4.98 | | | $ | 5.19 | | | $ | 4.16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic | | | 38,364 | | | | 39,964 | | | | 40,648 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted | | | 38,531 | | | | 40,190 | | | | 40,865 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) |
| Revenues: | | | | | |
| Products | $ | 433,012 |
| | $ | 685,364 |
| | $ | 773,205 |
|
| Services | 105,719 |
| | 158,946 |
| | 157,752 |
|
| Total revenues | 538,731 |
| | 844,310 |
| | 930,957 |
|
| Cost and expenses: | | | | | |
| Cost of sales: | | | | | |
| Products | 268,405 |
| | 382,925 |
| | 428,125 |
|
| Services | 59,999 |
| | 76,361 |
| | 85,402 |
|
| Total cost of sales | 328,404 |
| | 459,286 |
|
| 513,527 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | 53,143 |
| | 88,044 |
| | 92,762 |
|
| Engineering and product development | 44,325 |
| | 48,145 |
| | 45,920 |
|
| Total costs and expenses | 425,872 |
| | 595,475 |
| | 652,209 |
|
| Operating income | 112,859 |
| | 248,835 |
| | 278,748 |
|
| Interest income | 3,037 |
| | 948 |
| | 667 |
|
| Interest expense | (28 | ) | | (12 | ) | | (35 | ) |
| Income before income taxes | 115,868 |
| | 249,771 |
| | 279,380 |
|
| Income tax provision | 22,647 |
| | 57,763 |
| | 70,668 |
|
| Net income | $ | 93,221 |
| | $ | 192,008 |
| | $ | 208,712 |
|
| Earnings per common share: | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 2.48 |
| | $ | 5.00 |
| | $ | 5.22 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 2.47 |
| | $ | 4.98 |
| | $ | 5.19 |
|
| Weighted average common shares outstanding: | | | | | |
| Basic | 37,537 |
| | 38,364 |
| | 39,964 |
|
| Diluted | 37,667 |
| | 38,531 |
| | 40,190 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | (In thousands) | |
Net income | | $ | 192,008 | | | $ | 208,712 | | | $ | 169,827 | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | | | (51,060 | ) | | | (30,034 | ) | | | (6,340 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total comprehensive income | | $ | 140,948 | | | $ | 178,678 | | | $ | 163,487 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
DRIL-QUIP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, | |
| | 2015 | | | 2014 | |
| | | (In thousands) | |
| ASSETS | | | | |
Current assets: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 381,336 | | | $ | 298,705 | |
Trade receivables, net | | | 319,780 | | | | 373,993 | |
Inventories, net | | | 344,458 | | | | 392,559 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 24,613 | | | | 23,569 | |
Prepaids and other current assets | | | 54,111 | | | | 38,314 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | | | 1,124,298 | | | | 1,127,140 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | | | 294,251 | | | | 309,525 | |
Other assets | | | 9,701 | | | | 12,586 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | $ | 1,428,250 | | | $ | 1,449,251 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 30,934 | | | $ | 53,837 | |
Accrued income taxes | | | 14,052 | | | | 16,903 | |
Customer prepayments | | | 18,388 | | | | 71,177 | |
Accrued compensation | | | 17,957 | | | | 21,527 | |
Other accrued liabilities | | | 19,484 | | | | 35,198 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | | | 100,815 | | | | 198,642 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | 2,977 | | | | 5,417 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 103,792 | | | | 204,059 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) | | | | | | | | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock: 10,000,000 shares authorized at $0.01 par value (none issued) | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock: | | | | | | | | |
100,000,000 shares authorized at $0.01 par value at December 31, 2015 and 2014, 37,951,223 and 38,932,508 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014 | | | 378 | | | | 388 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | — | | | | 16,480 | |
Retained earnings | | | 1,425,344 | | | | 1,278,528 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive losses | | | (101,264 | ) | | | (50,204 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 1,324,458 | | | | 1,245,192 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 1,428,250 | | | $ | 1,449,251 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Net income | $ | 93,221 |
| | $ | 192,008 |
| | $ | 208,712 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | (49,141 | ) | | (51,060 | ) | | (30,034 | ) |
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 44,080 |
| | $ | 140,948 |
| | $ | 178,678 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | (In thousands) | |
Operating activities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 192,008 | | | $ | 208,712 | | | $ | 169,827 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 30,477 | | | | 31,155 | | | | 29,340 | |
Stock-based compensation expense | | | 13,125 | | | | 11,856 | | | | 8,900 | |
Loss (gain) on sale of equipment | | | 69 | | | | (146 | ) | | | 124 | |
Deferred income taxes | | | (3,465 | ) | | | (3,145 | ) | | | (1,235 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trade receivables, net | | | 36,729 | | | | (102,696 | ) | | | (17,250 | ) |
Inventories, net | | | 28,539 | | | | (36,814 | ) | | | (10,562 | ) |
Prepaids and other assets | | | (17,883 | ) | | | (13,239 | ) | | | 6,161 | |
Excess tax benefits of stock options and awards | | | (70 | ) | | | (558 | ) | | | (2,863 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | (89,374 | ) | | | 54,188 | | | | (20,213 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 190,155 | | | | 149,313 | | | | 162,229 | |
Investing activities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | | | (27,079 | ) | | | (42,549 | ) | | | (42,633 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of equipment | | | 424 | | | | 978 | | | | 760 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (26,655 | ) | | | (41,571 | ) | | | (41,873 | ) |
Financing activities | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase of common stock | | | (75,805 | ) | | | (190,234 | ) | | | (10,002 | ) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | | 2,170 | | | | 2,849 | | | | 10,506 | |
Excess tax benefits of stock options and awards | | | 70 | | | | 558 | | | | 2,863 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | (73,565 | ) | | | (186,827 | ) | | | 3,367 | |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash activities | | | (7,304 | ) | | | (6,566 | ) | | | 3,442 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | | 82,631 | | | | (85,651 | ) | | | 127,165 | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | | 298,705 | | | | 384,356 | | | | 257,191 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | | $ | 381,336 | | | $ | 298,705 | | | $ | 384,356 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE SHEETS
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| ASSETS | |
| Current assets: | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 423,497 |
| | $ | 381,336 |
|
| Trade receivables, net | 213,513 |
| | 319,780 |
|
| Inventories, net | 355,413 |
| | 344,458 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | 24,497 |
| | 24,613 |
|
| Prepaids and other current assets | 39,791 |
| | 54,111 |
|
| Total current assets | 1,056,711 |
| | 1,124,298 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 323,149 |
| | 294,251 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | 1,699 |
| | — |
|
| Goodwill | 34,371 |
| | — |
|
| Intangible assets | 29,594 |
| | — |
|
| Other assets | 15,880 |
| | 9,701 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 1,461,404 |
| | $ | 1,428,250 |
|
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | |
| Current liabilities: | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 36,108 |
| | $ | 30,934 |
|
| Accrued income taxes | 24,543 |
| | 14,052 |
|
| Customer prepayments | 11,884 |
| | 18,388 |
|
| Accrued compensation | 10,829 |
| | 17,957 |
|
| Other accrued liabilities | 18,116 |
| | 19,484 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 101,480 |
| | 100,815 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | 3,500 |
| | 2,977 |
|
| Total liabilities | 104,980 |
| | 103,792 |
|
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
| |
|
| Stockholders’ equity: | | | |
| Preferred stock: 10,000,000 shares authorized at $0.01 par value (none issued) | — |
| | — |
|
| Common stock: | | | |
| 100,000,000 shares authorized at $0.01 par value at December 31, 2016 and 2015, 37,797,317 and 37,951,223 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015 | 375 |
| | 378 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital | 5,468 |
| | — |
|
| Retained earnings | 1,500,988 |
| | 1,425,344 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive losses | (150,407 | ) | | (101,264 | ) |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 1,356,424 |
| | 1,324,458 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 1,461,404 |
| | $ | 1,428,250 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Common
Stock | | | Additional
Paid-In
Capital | | | Retained
Earnings | | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) | | | Total | |
| | | (In thousands) | |
Balance at December 31, 2012 | | $ | 405 | | | $ | 179,868 | | | $ | 899,989 | | | $ | (13,830 | ) | | $ | 1,066,432 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (6,340 | ) | | | (6,340 | ) |
Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | 169,827 | | | | — | | | | 169,827 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 163,487 | |
Options exercised and awards vested (284,653 shares) | | | 3 | | | | 10,503 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10,506 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | 8,900 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,900 | |
Excess tax benefits—stock options and awards | | | — | | | | 2,695 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,695 | |
Treasury stock (85,840 shares) | | | (1 | ) | | | (10,001 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | (10,002 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | | | 407 | | | | 191,965 | | | | 1,069,816 | | | | (20,170 | ) | | | 1,242,018 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (30,034 | ) | | | (30,034 | ) |
Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | 208,712 | | | | — | | | | 208,712 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 178,678 | |
Options exercised and awards vested (48,523 shares) | | | 1 | | | | 2,848 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,849 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | | | | | 11,856 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,856 | |
Excess tax benefits—stock options and awards | | | | | | | 25 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 25 | |
Treasury stock (2,023,172 shares) | | | (20 | ) | | | (190,214 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (190,234 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2014 | | | 388 | | | | 16,480 | | | | 1,278,528 | | | | (50,204 | ) | | | 1,245,192 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (51,060 | ) | | | (51,060 | ) |
Net income | | | — | | | | — | | | | 192,008 | | | | — | | | | 192,008 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 140,948 | |
Options exercised and awards vested (168,268 shares) | | | | | | | 2,170 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,170 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | 13,125 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 13,125 | |
Excess tax benefits—stock options and awards | | | — | | | | (1,172 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,172 | ) |
Treasury stock (1,184,700 shares) | | | (10 | ) | | | (30,603 | ) | | | (45,192 | ) | | | — | | | | (75,805 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2015 | | $ | 378 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,425,344 | | | $ | (101,264 | ) | | $ | 1,324,458 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Operating activities | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 93,221 |
| | $ | 192,008 |
| | $ | 208,712 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 31,857 |
| | 30,477 |
| | 31,155 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | 12,217 |
| | 13,125 |
| | 11,856 |
|
| Loss (gain) on sale of equipment | (103 | ) | | 69 |
| | (146 | ) |
| Deferred income taxes | (3,400 | ) | | (3,465 | ) | | (3,145 | ) |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
| Trade receivables, net | 106,544 |
| | 36,729 |
| | (102,696 | ) |
| Inventories, net | 7,873 |
| | 28,539 |
| | (36,814 | ) |
| Prepaids and other assets | 9,816 |
| | (17,883 | ) | | (13,239 | ) |
| Excess tax benefits of stock options and awards | (135 | ) | | (70 | ) | | (558 | ) |
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (11,368 | ) | | (89,374 | ) | | 54,188 |
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 246,522 |
| | 190,155 |
| | 149,313 |
|
| Investing activities | | | | | |
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (25,763 | ) | | (27,079 | ) | | (42,549 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of equipment | 357 |
| | 424 |
| | 978 |
|
| Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired | (132,443 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (157,849 | ) | | (26,655 | ) | | (41,571 | ) |
| Financing activities | | | | | |
| Repurchase of common stock | (24,234 | ) | | (75,805 | ) | | (190,234 | ) |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 2,206 |
| | 2,170 |
| | 2,849 |
|
| Excess tax benefits of stock options and awards | 135 |
| | 70 |
| | 558 |
|
| Net cash used in financing activities | (21,893 | ) | | (73,565 | ) | | (186,827 | ) |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash activities | (24,619 | ) | | (7,304 | ) | | (6,566 | ) |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 42,161 |
| | 82,631 |
| | (85,651 | ) |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 381,336 |
| | 298,705 |
| | 384,356 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 423,497 |
| | $ | 381,336 |
| | $ | 298,705 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Total |
| | (In thousands) |
| Balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | 407 |
| | $ | 191,965 |
| | $ | 1,069,816 |
| | $ | (20,170 | ) | | $ | 1,242,018 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (30,034 | ) | | (30,034 | ) |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | 208,712 |
| | — |
| | 208,712 |
|
| Comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 178,678 |
|
| Options exercised and awards vested (48,523 shares) | 1 |
| | 2,848 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,849 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | — |
| | 11,856 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,856 |
|
| Excess tax benefits—stock options and awards | — |
| | 25 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 25 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock (2,023,172 shares) | (20 | ) | | (190,214 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (190,234 | ) |
| Balance at December 31, 2014 | 388 |
| | 16,480 |
| | 1,278,528 |
| | (50,204 | ) | | 1,245,192 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (51,060 | ) | | (51,060 | ) |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | 192,008 |
| | — |
| | 192,008 |
|
| Comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 140,948 |
|
| Options exercised and awards vested (168,268 shares) | — |
| | 2,170 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,170 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | — |
| | 13,125 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,125 |
|
| Excess tax benefits—stock options and awards | — |
| | (1,172 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1,172 | ) |
| Repurchase of common stock (1,184,700 shares) | (10 | ) | | (30,603 | ) | | (45,192 | ) | | — |
| | (75,805 | ) |
| Balance at December 31, 2015 | 378 |
| | — |
| | 1,425,344 |
| | (101,264 | ) | | 1,324,458 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustment | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (49,141 | ) | | (49,141 | ) |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | 93,221 |
| | — |
| | 93,221 |
|
| Comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 44,080 |
|
| Options exercised and awards vested (163,547 shares) | 1 |
| | 2,205 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,206 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | — |
| | 12,217 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12,217 |
|
| Excess tax benefits—stock options and awards | — |
| | (2,241 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2,241 | ) |
| Repurchase of common stock (400,500 shares) | (4 | ) | | (6,713 | ) | | (17,517 | ) | | — |
| | (24,234 | ) |
| Other | — |
| | — |
| | (60 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (62 | ) |
| Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 375 |
| | $ | 5,468 |
| | $ | 1,500,988 |
| | $ | (150,407 | ) | | $ | 1,356,424 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
DRIL-QUIP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Dril-Quip, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “Dril-Quip”), designs, manufactures, sells and services highly engineered
offshore drilling and production equipment that is
primarily well suited for use in deepwater, harsh environment and severe service applications. The Company’s principal products consist of subsea and surface wellheads, subsea and surface production trees, subsea control systems and manifolds, mudline hanger systems, specialty connectors and associated pipe, drilling and production riser systems, liner hangers, wellhead connectors,
diverters and
diverters.safety valves. Dril-Quip’s products are used by major integrated, large independent and foreign national oil and gas companies
and drilling contractors primarily in offshore areas throughout the world. Dril-Quip also provides technical advisory assistance on an as-requested basis during installation of its products, as well as rework and reconditioning services for customer-owned Dril-Quip products. In addition, Dril-Quip’s customers may rent or purchase running tools from the Company for use in the installation and retrieval of the Company’s products.
The Company’s operations are organized into three geographic segments—Western Hemisphere (including North and South America; headquartered in Houston, Texas), Eastern Hemisphere (including Europe and Africa; headquartered in Aberdeen, Scotland) and Asia-Pacific (including the Pacific Rim, Southeast Asia, Australia, India and the Middle East; headquartered in Singapore). Each of these segments sells similar products and services and the Company has major manufacturing facilities in all three of its headquarter locations as well as in Macae, Brazil. The Company’s major subsidiaries are Dril-Quip (Europe) Limited, located in Aberdeen with branches in Denmark, Norway and Holland; Dril-Quip Asia Pacific PTE Ltd., located in Singapore; Dril-Quip do Brasil LTDA, located in Macae, Brazil; and DQ Holdings Pty. Ltd., located in Perth, Australia. Other subsidiaries include Dril-Quip (Ghana) Ltd. located in Takoradi,
Ghana,Ghana; PT DQ Oilfield Services Indonesia located in Jakarta,
Indonesia,Indonesia; Dril-Quip (Nigeria) Ltd. located in Port Harcourt,
Nigeria,Nigeria; Dril-Quip Egypt for Petroleum Services S.A.E. located in Alexandria,
Egypt,Egypt; Dril-Quip Oilfield Services (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. located in Tianjin,
ChinaChina; and Dril-Quip Qatar LLC, located in Doha, Qatar.
On November 10, 2016, the Company acquired TIW Corporation (TIW), a Texas corporation, located in Houston, Texas, and all of its subsidiaries, including TIW Canada Ltd. located in Alberta, Canada; TIW de Mexico S.A. de C.V., located in Villahermosa, Mexico; TIW de Venezuela S.A., located in Anaco, Venezuela and with a registered branch located in Shushufindi, Ecuador; TIW (UK) Limited, located in Aberdeen, Scotland; TIW Hungary LLC, located in Szolnok, Hungary; and TIW International, Inc., which has a registered branch located in Singapore. TIW manufactures consumable downhole products for the onshore and offshore global oil and gas market. For a listing of all of Dril-Quip's subsidiaries, please see Exhibit 21.1 to this report.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Some of the Company’s more significant estimates are those affected by critical accounting policies for revenue recognition, inventories and contingent liabilities.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Short-term investments that have a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents. The Company invests excess cash in interest bearing accounts, money market mutual funds and funds which invest in U.S. Treasury obligations and repurchase agreements backed by U.S. Treasury obligations. The Company’s investment objectives continue to be the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity.
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts on trade receivables equal to amounts estimated to be uncollectible. This estimate is based upon historical collection experience combined with a specific review of each customer’s outstanding trade receivable balance. Management believes that the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate; however, actual write-offs may exceed the recorded allowance.
Inventory costs are determined principally by the use of the first-in, first-out (FIFO) costing method and are stated at the lower of cost or market. Company manufactured inventory is valued principally using standard costs, which are calculated based upon direct costs incurred and overhead allocations and approximate actual costs. Inventory purchased from third-party vendors is principally valued at the weighted average cost. Periodically, obsolescence reviews are performed on slow-moving inventories and reserves are established based on current assessments about future demands and market conditions. The inventory values have been reduced by a reserve for excess and slow-moving inventories. Inventory reserves of
$39.2$45.6 million and
$34.6$39.2 million were recorded as of December 31,
20152016 and
2014,2015, respectively. If market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory reserves may be required.
Inventories acquired from TIW as of November 10, 2016 have been recorded at provisional fair values. For additional information, see Note 4, Business Acquisitions.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost, with depreciation provided on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
Property, plant and equipment acquired from TIW as of November 10, 2016 have been recorded at provisional fair values. For additional information, see Note 4, Business Acquisitions.
Goodwill
Goodwill consists of the excess of the acquisition costs over the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of each year and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may be impaired. For this purpose, goodwill is evaluated at the reporting unit level. Dril-Quip recorded goodwill related to the acquisition of TIW. For further information regarding goodwill, see Note 7, Goodwill.
Intangible Assets
Definite-lived intangible assets consist of patents and customer relationships. Dril-Quip recognizes amortization expense for definite-lived intangible assets on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives. Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of trademarks, specifically trade names acquired as part of the acquisition of TIW. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are stated at cost and are not amortized; instead, they are tested for impairment at least annually. The Company reviews acquired trademarks for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. The fair value of trademarks is estimated using the relief from royalty method to estimate the value of the cost savings and a discounted cash flows method to estimate the value of future income. The sum of these two values for each trademark is the fair value of the trademark. If the carrying amount of trademarks exceeds the estimated fair value, the impairment is calculated as the excess of carrying amount over the estimate of fair value. For additional information regarding other assets, see Note 8, Intangible Assets.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, an impairment charge is recognized by reflecting the asset at its fair value. No impairments of long-lived assets were recorded in
2016, 2015
2014 or
2013.2014.
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Current income taxes are provided on income reported for financial statement purposes, adjusted for transactions that do not enter into the computation of income taxes payable in the same year. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. The effect
on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company classifies interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income taxes in its financial statements.
The Company recognizes product revenues from two methods:
product revenues recognized under the percentage-of-completion method; and
product revenues from the sale of products that do not qualify for the percentage-of-completion method.
Revenues recognized under the percentage-of-completion method
The Company uses the percentage-of-completion method on long-term project contracts that have the following characteristics:
the contracts call for products which are designed to customer specifications;
the structural designs are unique and require significant engineering and manufacturing efforts generally requiring more than one year in duration;
the contracts contain specific terms as to milestones, progress billings and delivery dates; and
product requirements cannot be filled directly from the Company’s standard inventory.
For each project, the Company prepares a detailed analysis of estimated costs, profit margin, completion date and risk factors which include availability of material, production efficiencies and other factors that may impact the project. On a quarterly basis, management reviews the progress of each project, which may result in revisions of previous estimates, including revenue recognition. The Company calculates the
percentpercentage complete and applies the percentage to determine the revenues earned and the appropriate portion of total estimated costs. Losses, if any, are recorded in full in the period they become known. Historically, the Company’s estimates of total costs and costs to complete have approximated actual costs incurred to complete the project.
Under the percentage-of-completion method, billings
domay not
always correlate directly to the revenue recognized. Based upon the terms of the specific contract, billings may be in excess of the revenue recognized, in which case the amounts are included in customer prepayments as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Likewise, revenue recognized may exceed customer billings in which case the amounts are reported in trade receivables. Unbilled revenues are expected to be billed and collected within one year. At December 31,
20152016 and
2014,2015, receivables included
$70.8$56.8 million and
$68.0$70.8 million of unbilled receivables, respectively. For the year ended December 31,
2015,2016, there were
10 projects representing approximately 14% of the Company’s total revenues and approximately 17% of its product revenues, and 14 projects
during 2015 representing approximately 16% of the Company’s total revenues and approximately 19% of its product revenues,
and 17 projects during 2014 representing approximately 11% of the Company’s total revenues and approximately 13% of its product revenues, which were accounted for using percentage-of-completion accounting.
Revenues not recognized under the percentage-of-completion method
Revenues from the sale of inventory products, not accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method, are recorded at the time the manufacturing processes are complete and ownership is transferred to the customer.
The Company earns service revenues from three sources:
technical advisory assistance;
rental of running tools; and
rework and reconditioning of customer-owned Dril-Quip products.
The Company does not install products for its customers, but it does provide technical advisory assistance. At the time of delivery of the product, the customer is not obligated to buy or rent the Company’s running tools and the Company is not obligated to perform any subsequent services relating to installation. Technical advisory assistance service revenue is recorded at the time the service is rendered. Service revenues associated with the rental of running and installation tools are recorded as earned. Rework and reconditioning service revenues are recorded when the refurbishment process is complete.
The Company normally negotiates contracts for products, including those accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method, and services separately. For all product sales, it is the customer’s decision as to the timing of the product
installation as well as whether Dril-Quip running tools will be purchased or rented. Furthermore, the customer is under no obligation to utilize the Company’s technical advisory assistance services. The customer may use a third party or their own personnel.
The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates except for revenues and expenses, which are translated at average monthly rates. Translation adjustments are reflected as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and have no effect on current earnings or cash flows.
Foreign currency exchange transactions are recorded using the exchange rate at the date of the settlement. The Company experienced exchange gains of approximately
$25.6 million, $3.9 million and $3.4 million in
2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively,
and exchange losses of $4.6 million in 2013, net of income taxes. These amounts are included in selling, general and administrative costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income on a pre-tax basis.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and payables. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their respective fair values as they are short-term in nature.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk primarily include trade receivables. The Company grants credit to its customers, which operate primarily in the oil and gas industry. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains reserves for potential losses, and actual losses have historically been within management’s expectations.
In addition, the Company invests excess cash in interest bearing accounts, money market mutual funds and funds which invest in obligations of the U.S. Treasury and repurchase agreements backed by U.S. Treasury obligations. Changes in the financial markets and interest rates could affect the interest earned on short-term investments.
Basic earnings per
common share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per common share are computed considering the dilutive effect of stock options and awards using the treasury stock method.
Options where the exercise price exceeds the average market price are excluded from the calculation of diluted net earnings per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive.
3. New Accounting Standards
In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350).” The standard simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by removing the second step of the two-step impairment test. The amendment requires an entity to perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The amendment should be applied on a prospective basis. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is evaluating the impact of the new standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805).” This update clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is evaluating the impact of the new standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718).” The standard simplifies several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures and statutory withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
The Company expects the primary impact of this ASU to be the income tax effects of awards recognized in the statement of cash flows when the awards are vested or settled.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842).” The new standard requires lessees to recognize lease assets (right of use) and lease obligations (lease liability) for leases previously classified as operating leases under generally accepted accounting principles on the balance sheet for leases with terms in excess of 12 months. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company has launched an internal project to evaluate the impact of the new standard on its financial statements. Dril-Quip has $16.8 million in future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2016. Dril-Quip is a lessee in the majority of its leasing transactions and expects the implementation of the new standard to increase its non-current assets and non-current liabilities. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new standard on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17 “Income Taxes (Topic 740).” In an effort to reduce complexity, the requirement to separate deferred income tax liabilities and assets into current and noncurrent amounts will no longer be necessary. In the future, all deferred income taxes will be considered noncurrent and will continue to be offset into a single amount within each country. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company’s financial statements will be revised to reflect this amendment beginning in the first quarter of 2017.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11 “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory (Topic 330).” This standard states that inventory within the scope of this update should be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling price in the normal course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is evaluating the impact of the new
guidancestandard on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The amendment applies a new five-step revenue recognition model to be used in recognizing revenues associated with customer contracts. The amendment requires disclosure sufficient to enable readers of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, including qualitative and quantitative disclosures, significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill the contract. The standard’s effective date was originally for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. On April 1, 2015, the FASB voted to defer the effective date by one year to December 15, 2017 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company
will adopt this standard on January 1, 2018. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of the new
guidancestandard on its consolidated financial statements.
4. Business Acquisitions
On October 14, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Pearce Industries, Inc. to acquire all the outstanding common stock, par value $100.00 per share, of TIW Corporation (TIW) for a cash purchase price of $142.7 million, which is subject to customary adjustments for cash and working capital. The acquisition closed on November 10, 2016 and is expected to strengthen the Company's liner hanger sales and increase market share. Additionally, the acquisition of TIW gives Dril-Quip a presence in the onshore oil and gas market.
Total acquisition costs through December 31, 2016 in connection with the purchase of TIW were $2.5 million and were expensed in general and administrative costs.
Purchase Price Allocation
Acquired assets and liabilities were recorded at estimated fair value as of the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of tangible and intangible identifiable net assets resulted in the recognition of goodwill of $34.4 million, the majority of which is included in long-lived assets in the Western Hemisphere and is attributable to expected synergies from combining operations as well as intangible assets which do not qualify for separate recognition. The amount of goodwill that is deductible for income tax purposes is not significant.
The goodwill was determined on the basis of the fair values of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date. It may be adjusted if the provisional fair values change as a result of circumstances existing at the acquisition date. Such fair value adjustments may arise in respect to intangible assets, inventories and property, plant and equipment, upon completion of the necessary valuations and physical verifications of such assets. The amount of deferred taxes may also be adjusted during the measurement period. For further information regarding goodwill, see Note 7.
The following table sets forth the preliminary purchase price allocation, which was based on fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, November 10, 2016:
|
| | | |
| | Valuation at November 10, 2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Cash | $ | 1,829 |
|
| Trade receivables | 9,794 |
|
| Inventories | 29,896 |
|
| Prepaid and other current assets | 3,572 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | 205 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 38,058 |
|
Intangible assets (1) | 29,808 |
|
| Total assets acquired | $ | 113,162 |
|
| | |
| Accounts payable | 5,599 |
|
| Customer prepayments | 2,757 |
|
| Other accrued liabilities | 2,644 |
|
| Deferred tax liabilities, non-current | 2,261 |
|
| Total liabilities assumed | $ | 13,261 |
|
| | |
| Net identifiable assets acquired | $ | 99,901 |
|
| Goodwill | 34,371 |
|
| Net assets acquired | $ | 134,272 |
|
(1) Includes $3.3 million of patents with a weighted average useful life of 10 years, $8.4 million of tradenames with an indefinite life and $18.1 million of customer relationships with a weighted average useful life of 15 years. See Note 8 for further information regarding intangible assets.
Summary of Unaudited Pro Forma Information
TIW's results of operations have been included in Dril-Quip's financial statements for the period subsequent to the closing of the acquisition on November 10, 2016. Business acquired from TIW contributed revenues of $6.6 million, a pre-tax operating loss of $4.4 million and a net loss of $3.1 million for the period from November 10, 2016 through December 31, 2016. The following table reflects the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for the period presented, as though the acquisition of TIW had occurred on January 1, 2015:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) |
| | (unaudited) |
| Revenues | $ | 595,797 |
| | $ | 943,714 |
|
| Net income | $ | 84,756 |
| | $ | 193,310 |
|
| Basic earnings per share | $ | 2.26 |
| | $ | 5.04 |
|
| Diluted earnings per share | $ | 2.25 |
| | $ | 5.02 |
|
The unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been realized if the acquisition had been completed on the date indicated, nor is it indicative of future operating results. The pro forma results do not include, for example, the effects of anticipated synergies from the acquisition.
Inventories consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | |
| | | (In thousands) | |
Raw materials and supplies | | $ | 101,311 | | | $ | 107,357 | |
Work in progress | | | 104,102 | | | | 112,514 | |
Finished goods | | | 178,292 | | | | 207,295 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | 383,705 | | | | 427,166 | |
Less: allowance for obsolete and excess inventory | | | (39,247 | ) | | | (34,607 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Total inventory | | $ | 344,458 | | | $ | 392,559 | |
| | | | | | | | |
5.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Raw materials and supplies | $ | 85,684 |
| | $ | 101,311 |
|
| Work in progress | 81,645 |
| | 104,102 |
|
| Finished goods | 233,732 |
| | 178,292 |
|
| | 401,061 |
| | 383,705 |
|
| Less: allowance for obsolete and excess inventory | (45,648 | ) | | (39,247 | ) |
| Total inventory | $ | 355,413 |
| | $ | 344,458 |
|
6. Property, Plant and Equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment consists of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Estimated
Useful Lives | | | December 31, | |
| | | | 2015 | | | 2014 | |
| | | | | | (In thousands) | |
Land and improvements | | | 10-25 years | | | $ | 27,753 | | | $ | 26,854 | |
Buildings | | | 15-40 years | | | | 188,420 | | | | 194,587 | |
Machinery, equipment and other | | | 3-10 years | | | | 351,477 | | | | 340,279 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 567,650 | | | | 561,720 | |
Less accumulated depreciation | | | | | | | (273,399 | ) | | | (252,195 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total property, plant and equipment | | | | | | $ | 294,251 | | | $ | 309,525 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Estimated Useful Lives | | December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | | | (In thousands) |
| Land and improvements | 10-25 years | | $ | 26,653 |
| | $ | 27,753 |
|
| Buildings | 15-40 years | | 201,239 |
| | 188,420 |
|
| Machinery, equipment and other | 3-10 years | | 389,111 |
| | 351,477 |
|
| | | | 617,003 |
| | 567,650 |
|
| Less accumulated depreciation | | | (293,854 | ) | | (273,399 | ) |
| Total property, plant and equipment | | | $ | 323,149 |
| | $ | 294,251 |
|
Depreciation expense totaled $31.6 million, $30.5 million and $31.2 million for 2016, 2015 and $29.32014, respectively.
7. Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reporting unit during the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Carrying Value | | | Carrying Value |
| | January 1, 2016 | Acquisition of TIW | Impairments | December 31, 2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Western Hemisphere | $ | — |
| $ | 26,632 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 26,632 |
|
| Eastern Hemisphere | — |
| 7,739 |
| — |
| 7,739 |
|
| Asia-Pacific | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Total | $ | — |
| $ | 34,371 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 34,371 |
|
8. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets, the majority of which were acquired in the acquisition of TIW, consist of the following:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Estimated
Useful Lives | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | Gross Book Value | Accumulated Amortization | Net Book Value | | Gross Book Value | Accumulated Amortization | Net Book Value |
| | | | (In thousands) |
| Trademarks | indefinite | | $ | 8,416 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 8,416 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
| Patents | 15 - 30 years | | 3,583 |
| 294 |
| 3,289 |
| | 248 |
| 248 |
| — |
|
| Customer relationships | 5 - 15 years | | 18,057 |
| 168 |
| 17,889 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
| | | | $ | 30,056 |
| $ | 462 |
| $ | 29,594 |
| | $ | 248 |
| $ | 248 |
| $ | — |
|
Amortization expense was $0.2 million, none and none for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Based on the carrying value of intangible assets at December 31, 2016, amortization expense for the subsequent five years is estimated to be as follows: 2017—$1.5 million; 2018—$1.5 million; 2019—$1.5 million; 2020—$1.5 million; and 2013, respectively.6.2021—$1.5 million.
The Company is required to recognize the impact of a tax position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination based upon the technical merits of the position, including resolution of any appeals.
Based on the Company’s evaluation, the Company has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Company’s financial statements. TheAn evaluation was performed for the tax years which remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions as of December 31,
2015,2016, which are the years ended December 31,
20082009 through December 31,
2014.2015. The Company has occasionally been assessed interest or penalties by major tax jurisdictions; these assessments historically have not materially impacted the Company’s financial results. Interest expense assessed by tax jurisdictions is included with interest expense and assessed penalties are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
The Company evaluates uncertain tax positions for recognition and measurement in the consolidated financial statements. To recognize a tax position, the Company determines whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation, based on the technical merits of the position. A tax position that meets the more likely than not threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The amount of tax benefit recognized with respect to any tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement. The Company had
an uncertain tax position of $5.7 million at December 31, 2016 due to uncertainty in special provisions in foreign tax jurisidictions. There were no uncertain tax positions
that required recognition infor the
consolidated financial statements atyears ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. If it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be realized, a valuation allowance would be established to reduce deferred tax assets. As of December 31,
20152016 and
2014,2015, the Company determined that a valuation allowance was not necessary.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
|
| | | |
| | 2016 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Balance at beginning of year | $ | — |
|
| Additions for tax positions related to the current year | — |
|
| Additions for tax positions in prior years | 3,628 |
|
| Additions related to acquisitions | 2,089 |
|
| Balance at end of year | $ | 5,717 |
|
It is reasonably possible that the Company's existing liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the year ending December 31, 2017, primarily due to the progression of any audits and the expiration of statutes of limitation. However, the Company cannot reasonably estimate a range of potential changes in its existing liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits due to various uncertainties, such as the unresolved nature of any possible audits. As of December 31, 2016, if recognized, $5.7 million of the Company's unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, would favorably impact the effective tax rate.
Income before income taxes consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | (In thousands) | |
Domestic | | $ | 107,158 | | | $ | 124,571 | | | $ | 98,883 | |
Foreign | | | 142,613 | | | | 154,809 | | | | 125,214 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 249,771 | | | $ | 279,380 | | | $ | 224,097 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Domestic | $ | 33,543 |
| | $ | 107,158 |
| | $ | 124,571 |
|
| Foreign | 82,325 |
| | 142,613 |
| | 154,809 |
|
| Total | $ | 115,868 |
| | $ | 249,771 |
| | $ | 279,380 |
|
The income tax provision (benefit) consists of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | (In thousands) | |
Current: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | $ | 33,017 | | | $ | 43,652 | | | $ | 30,962 | |
Foreign | | | 28,229 | | | | 30,022 | | | | 24,543 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current | | | 61,246 | | | | 73,674 | | | | 55,505 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Federal | | | (1,611 | ) | | | (5,916 | ) | | | (1,299 | ) |
Foreign | | | (1,872 | ) | | | 2,910 | | | | 64 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total deferred | | | (3,483 | ) | | | (3,006 | ) | | | (1,235 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 57,763 | | | $ | 70,668 | | | $ | 54,270 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Current: | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | 8,461 |
| | $ | 33,017 |
| | $ | 43,652 |
|
| Foreign | 15,246 |
| | 28,229 |
| | 30,022 |
|
| Total current | 23,707 |
| | 61,246 |
| | 73,674 |
|
| Deferred: | | | | | |
| Federal | 1,121 |
| | (1,611 | ) | | (5,916 | ) |
| Foreign | (2,181 | ) | | (1,872 | ) | | 2,910 |
|
| Total deferred | (1,060 | ) | | (3,483 | ) | | (3,006 | ) |
| Total | $ | 22,647 |
| | $ | 57,763 |
| | $ | 70,668 |
|
The difference between the effective income tax rate reflected in the provision for income taxes and the U.S. federal statutory rate was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Federal income tax statutory rate | | | 35.0 | % | | | 35.0 | % | | | 35.0 | % |
Foreign income tax rate differential | | | (7.3 | ) | | | (6.0 | ) | | | (6.0 | ) |
Foreign development tax incentive | | | (1.3 | ) | | | (1.6 | ) | | | (2.6 | ) |
Manufacturing benefit | | | (1.4 | ) | | | (1.7 | ) | | | (1.4 | ) |
Foreign intellectual property tax benefit | | | (0.8 | ) | | | (0.0 | ) | | | (0.0 | ) |
Other | | | (1.1 | ) | | | (0.4 | ) | | | (0.8 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Effective income tax rate | | | 23.1 | % | | | 25.3 | % | | | 24.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As part
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Federal income tax statutory rate | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % |
| Foreign income tax rate differential | (11.7 | ) | | (7.3 | ) | | (6.0 | ) |
| Foreign development tax incentive | (0.9 | ) | | (1.3 | ) | | (1.6 | ) |
| Manufacturing benefit | (1.1 | ) | | (1.4 | ) | | (1.7 | ) |
| Foreign intellectual property tax benefit | (1.0 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | — |
|
| Other | (0.8 | ) | | (1.1 | ) | | (0.4 | ) |
| Effective income tax rate | 19.5 | % | | 23.1 | % | | 25.3 | % |
Table of the United Kingdom’s (U.K.) growth agenda, the “patent box” tax regime, effective April 1, 2013, was introduced to provide an additional incentive to develop, commercialize and retain innovative patented technology in the U.K. This foreign intellectual property tax benefit enables the Company’s U.K. operations to begin to phase in a corporate tax rate of 10% on profits earned from qualifying products over four years beginning April 1, 2013. The full benefit of the patent box tax regime will become available in April 2017. The Company has recorded in December 2015 a total “patent box” benefit of approximately $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015. It is reasonably possible that the benefit could be reviewed by the U.K. taxing authority and the amount of benefit claimed could be adjusted. However, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that the tax positions taken by the Company, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation, will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the positions and as such, no uncertain tax position has been recognized.Contents
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Based upon existing market conditions and the Company’s earnings prospects, it is anticipated that all deferred tax assets will be realized in future years.
If it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be realized, a valuation allowance would be established to reduce deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company determined that a valuation allowance was not necessary. Significant components of the Company’s net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | |
| | | (In thousands) | |
Net current deferred tax assets: | | | | | | | | |
Inventory | | $ | 11,062 | | | $ | 10,835 | |
Inventory reserve | | | 8,926 | | | | 8,535 | |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | | | 1,578 | | | | 1,022 | |
Reserve for accrued liabilities | | | 1,205 | | | | 510 | |
Other | | | 1,842 | | | | 2,667 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net current deferred tax assets | | | 24,613 | | | | 23,569 | |
Net non-current deferred tax liability: | | | | | | | | |
Property, plant and equipment | | | (10,583 | ) | | | (11,295 | ) |
Stock options | | | 6,898 | | | | 5,735 | |
Other | | | 708 | | | | 143 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net non-current deferred tax liabilities | | | (2,977 | ) | | | (5,417 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
Net deferred tax asset | | $ | 21,636 | | | $ | 18,152 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Net current deferred tax assets: | | | |
| Inventory | $ | 11,674 |
| | $ | 11,062 |
|
| Inventory reserve | 9,857 |
| | 8,926 |
|
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | 1,311 |
| | 1,578 |
|
| Reserve for accrued liabilities | 840 |
| | 1,205 |
|
| Other | 815 |
| | 1,842 |
|
| Net current deferred tax assets | 24,497 |
| | 24,613 |
|
| Net non-current deferred tax liability: | | | |
| Property, plant and equipment | (9,552 | ) | | (10,583 | ) |
| Stock options | 6,052 |
| | 6,898 |
|
| Other | 1,699 |
| | 708 |
|
| Net non-current deferred tax liabilities | (1,801 | ) | | (2,977 | ) |
| Net deferred tax asset | $ | 22,696 |
| | $ | 21,636 |
|
Undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal income taxes has been provided thereon. The estimate of
undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries amounted to $784$854 million as of December 31, 2015.2016. Upon distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company may be subject to both U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability is not practicable.
The Company paid
$23.0 million, $61.7 million
$69.9 million and
$41.0$69.9 million in income taxes in
2016, 2015
and 2014,
and 2013, respectively.
7.
10. Other Accrued Liabilities
Other accrued liabilities consist of the following:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | |
| | | (In thousands) | |
Payroll taxes | | $ | 2,639 | | | $ | 3,354 | |
Property, sales and other taxes | | | 7,059 | | | | 12,702 | |
Commissions payable | | | 1,925 | | | | 3,917 | |
Accrued vendor costs | | | 3,134 | | | | 10,162 | |
Other | | | 4,727 | | | | 5,063 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 19,484 | | | $ | 35,198 | |
| | | | | | | | |
8.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Payroll taxes | $ | 3,151 |
| | $ | 2,639 |
|
| Property, sales and other taxes | 6,258 |
| | 7,059 |
|
| Commissions payable | 1,424 |
| | 1,925 |
|
| Accrued vendor costs | 2,185 |
| | 3,134 |
|
| Accrued warranties | 3,853 |
| | 4,414 |
|
| Other | 1,245 |
| | 313 |
|
| Total | $ | 18,116 |
| | $ | 19,484 |
|
11. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company has a defined-contribution 401(k) plan covering domestic employees and a defined-contribution pension plan covering certain foreign employees. The Company generally makes contributions to the plans equal to each participant’s eligible contributions for the plan year up to a specified percentage of the participant’s annual compensation. The Company’s contribution expense was
$4.6 million, $5.7 million
and $5.9 million
in 2016, 2015 and
$4.9 million in 2015, 2014,
and 2013, respectively.
9.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company leases certain offices, shop and warehouse facilities, automobiles and equipment. Total lease expense incurred was
$5.0 million, $5.1 million
and $4.2 million
in 2016, 2015 and
$3.5 million in 2015, 2014,
and 2013, respectively. Future annual minimum lease commitments at December 31,
20152016 are as follows:
2016—$3.2 million; 2017—$
2.13.5 million; 2018—$
2.4 million; 2019—$1.8 million;
2019—2020—$
1.51.6 million;
2020—2021—$
1.30.8 million; and thereafter—$
4.46.7 million.
From 2002 to 2007, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary imported goods through the State of Espirito Santo in Brazil and subsequently transferred them to its facility in the State of Rio de Janeiro. During that period, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary paid taxes to the State of Espirito Santo on its imports. Upon the final sale of these goods, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary collected taxes from customers and remitted them to the State of Rio de Janeiro net of the taxes paid on importation of those goods to the State of Espirito Santo in accordance with the Company’s understanding of Brazilian tax laws.
In August 2007, the State of Rio de Janeiro served the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary with assessments to collect a state tax on the importation of goods through the State of Espirito Santo from 2002 to 2007 claiming that these taxes were due and payable to it under applicable law. The Company settled these assessments with payments to the State of Rio de Janeiro of $12.2 million in March 2010 and $3.9 million in December 2010.
Approximately $7.8 million of these settlement payments were attributable to penalties, interest and amounts that had expired under the statute of limitations so that amount was recorded as an expense. The remainder of the settlement payments generated credits (recorded as a long-term prepaid tax) to be used to offset future state taxes on sales to customers in the State of Rio de Janeiro, subject to certification by the tax authorities. During the second quarter of 2015, the tax authorities certified approximately $8.3 million of those credits paid in 2010 and granted an additional $2.3 million in inflation-related credits. The additional amount of credits granted by the tax authorities increased long-term prepaid taxes and decreased selling, general and administrative expenses by $2.3 million.
In December 2010 and January 2011, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary was served with two additional assessments totaling approximately $13.0 million from the State of Rio de Janeiro to cancel the credits associated with the tax payments to the State of Espirito Santo
(“Santo Credits”)(Santo Credits) on the importation of goods from July 2005 to October 2007. The Santo Credits are not related to the credits described above. The Company has objected to these assessments on the grounds that they would represent double taxation on the importation of the same goods and that the Company is entitled to the credits under applicable Brazilian law. With regard to the December 2010 assessment, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary filed an appeal with a State of Rio de Janeiro judicial court to annul the tax assessment following a ruling against the Company by the tax administration’s highest council. In connection with that appeal, the Company was required to deposit with the court approximately $3.1 million in December 2014 as the full amount of the assessment with penalties and interest. The Company
intends to filefiled a similar appeal in the judicial system with regard to the January 2011 assessment
as a result of a recent ruling againstand was required to deposit with the
Company by the tax administration’s highest council once that ruling is finalized.court approximately $5.7 million in December 2016. The Company believes that these credits are valid and that success in the judicial court process is probable. Based upon this analysis, the Company has not accrued any liability in conjunction with this matter.
Since 2007, the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary has paid taxes on the importation of goods directly to the State of Rio de Janeiro and the Company does not expect any similar issues to exist for periods subsequent to 2007.
The Company operates its business and markets its products and services in most of the significant oil and gas producing areas in the world and is, therefore, subject to the risks customarily attendant to international operations and dependency on the condition of the oil and gas industry. Additionally, products of the Company are used in potentially hazardous drilling, completion, and production applications that can cause personal injury, product liability and environmental claims. Although exposure to such risk has not resulted in any significant problems in the past, there can be no assurance that ongoing and future developments will not adversely impact the Company.
The Company is also involved in a number of legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. Although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of such legal action, in the opinion of management, the ultimate liability with respect thereto will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
10.
13. Geographic Segments
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year ended December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | (In thousands) | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Western Hemisphere | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Products | | $ | 332,452 | | | $ | 430,597 | | | $ | 420,439 | |
Services | | | 88,376 | | | | 74,544 | | | | 72,328 | |
Intercompany | | | 53,429 | | | | 55,094 | | | | 51,767 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 474,257 | | | $ | 560,235 | | | $ | 544,534 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Eastern Hemisphere | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Products | | $ | 234,853 | | | $ | 205,185 | | | $ | 186,074 | |
Services | | | 52,963 | | | | 59,794 | | | | 46,653 | |
Intercompany | | | 5,799 | | | | 10,719 | | | | 1,254 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 293,615 | | | $ | 275,698 | | | $ | 233,981 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asia-Pacific | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Products | | $ | 118,059 | | | $ | 137,423 | | | $ | 125,104 | |
Services | | | 17,607 | | | | 23,414 | | | | 21,774 | |
Intercompany | | | 5,124 | | | | 3,165 | | | | 9,155 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 140,790 | | | $ | 164,002 | | | $ | 156,033 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Summary | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Products | | $ | 685,364 | | | $ | 773,205 | | | $ | 731,617 | |
Services | | | 158,946 | | | | 157,752 | | | | 140,755 | |
Intercompany | | | 64,352 | | | | 68,978 | | | | 62,176 | |
Eliminations | | | (64,352 | ) | | | (68,978 | ) | | | (62,176 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 844,310 | | | $ | 930,957 | | | $ | 872,372 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Western Hemisphere | | $ | 112,499 | | | $ | 143,206 | | | $ | 111,498 | |
Eastern Hemisphere | | | 89,349 | | | | 79,146 | | | | 49,672 | |
Asia-Pacific | | | 38,155 | | | | 54,302 | | | | 55,136 | |
Eliminations | | | 9,768 | | | | 2,726 | | | | 7,791 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 249,771 | | | $ | 279,380 | | | $ | 224,097 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Long-Lived Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Western Hemisphere | | $ | 208,408 | | | $ | 221,597 | | | $ | 216,104 | |
Eastern Hemisphere | | | 43,449 | | | | 45,517 | | | | 43,430 | |
Asia-Pacific | | | 55,021 | | | | 57,923 | | | | 59,192 | |
Eliminations | | | (2,926 | ) | | | (2,926 | ) | | | (2,927 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 303,952 | | | $ | 322,111 | | | $ | 315,799 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Western Hemisphere | | $ | 677,460 | | | $ | 731,448 | | | $ | 805,399 | |
Eastern Hemisphere | | | 391,672 | | | | 375,781 | | | | 316,473 | |
Asia-Pacific | | | 372,823 | | | | 354,329 | | | | 292,463 | |
Eliminations | | | (13,705 | ) | | | (12,307 | ) | | | (17,530 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 1,428,250 | | | $ | 1,449,251 | | | $ | 1,396,805 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (In thousands) |
| Revenues: | | | | | |
| Western Hemisphere | | | | | |
| Products | $ | 254,359 |
| | $ | 332,452 |
| | $ | 430,597 |
|
| Services | 63,350 |
| | 88,376 |
| | 74,544 |
|
| Intercompany | 43,856 |
| | 53,429 |
| | 55,094 |
|
| Total | $ | 361,565 |
| | $ | 474,257 |
| | $ | 560,235 |
|
| Eastern Hemisphere | | | | | |
| Products | $ | 106,862 |
| | $ | 234,853 |
| | $ | 205,185 |
|
| Services | 34,818 |
| | 52,963 |
| | 59,794 |
|
| Intercompany | 337 |
| | 5,799 |
| | 10,719 |
|
| Total | $ | 142,017 |
| | $ | 293,615 |
| | $ | 275,698 |
|
| Asia-Pacific | | | | | |
| Products | $ | 71,791 |
| | $ | 118,059 |
| | $ | 137,423 |
|
| Services | 7,551 |
| | 17,607 |
| | 23,414 |
|
| Intercompany | 1,882 |
| | 5,124 |
| | 3,165 |
|
| Total | $ | 81,224 |
| | $ | 140,790 |
| | $ | 164,002 |
|
| Summary | | | | | |
| Products | $ | 433,012 |
| | $ | 685,364 |
| | $ | 773,205 |
|
| Services | 105,719 |
| | 158,946 |
| | 157,752 |
|
| Intercompany | 46,075 |
| | 64,352 |
| | 68,978 |
|
| Eliminations | (46,075 | ) | | (64,352 | ) | | (68,978 | ) |
| Total | $ | 538,731 |
| | $ | 844,310 |
| | $ | 930,957 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization: | | | | | |
| Western Hemisphere | 22,455 |
| | 20,301 |
| | 20,851 |
|
| Eastern Hemisphere | 4,965 |
| | 5,685 |
| | 5,794 |
|
| Asia-Pacific | 4,437 |
| | 4,491 |
| | 4,510 |
|
| Total | $ | 31,857 |
| | $ | 30,477 |
| | $ | 31,155 |
|
| Income before income taxes: | | | | | |
| Western Hemisphere | $ | 40,280 |
| | $ | 112,499 |
| | $ | 143,206 |
|
| Eastern Hemisphere | 60,835 |
| | 89,349 |
| | 79,146 |
|
| Asia-Pacific | 12,779 |
| | 38,155 |
| | 54,302 |
|
| Eliminations | 1,974 |
| | 9,768 |
| | 2,726 |
|
| Total | $ | 115,868 |
| | $ | 249,771 |
| | $ | 279,380 |
|
| Total Long-Lived Assets: | | | | | |
| Western Hemisphere | $ | 317,875 |
| | $ | 208,408 |
| | $ | 221,597 |
|
| Eastern Hemisphere | 33,338 |
| | 43,449 |
| | 45,517 |
|
| Asia-Pacific | 53,960 |
| | 55,021 |
| | 57,823 |
|
| Eliminations | (480 | ) | | (2,926 | ) | | (2,926 | ) |
| Total | $ | 404,693 |
| | $ | 303,952 |
| | $ | 322,011 |
|
| Total Assets: | | | | | |
| Western Hemisphere | $ | 775,358 |
| | $ | 677,460 |
| | $ | 731,448 |
|
| Eastern Hemisphere | 318,529 |
| | 391,672 |
| | 375,781 |
|
| Asia-Pacific | 370,043 |
| | 372,823 |
| | 354,329 |
|
| Eliminations | (2,526 | ) | | (13,705 | ) | | (12,307 | ) |
| Total | $ | 1,461,404 |
| | $ | 1,428,250 |
| | $ | 1,449,251 |
|
The Company’s operations are organized into three geographic segments—Western Hemisphere (including North and South America; headquartered in Houston, Texas), Eastern Hemisphere (including Europe and Africa; headquartered in Aberdeen, Scotland) and Asia-Pacific (including the Pacific Rim, Southeast Asia, Australia, India and the Middle East; headquartered in Singapore). Each of these segments sells similar products and services and the Company has major manufacturing facilities in all three of its headquarter locations as well as in Macae, Brazil.
Eliminations of operating profits are related to intercompany inventory transfers that are deferred until shipment is made to third party customers.
In 2016, Chevron and its affiliated companies accounted for approximately 16% of the Company’s total revenues. In 2015
and 2014, Chevron and its affiliated companies accounted for approximately 12%
of the Company’s total revenues. In 2014, Chevron and
its affiliated companies accounted for approximately 10%
of the Company’s total revenues and in 2013, Petrobras and its affiliated companies accounted for approximately 11%, respectively, of the Company’s total revenues. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s total revenues in
2016, 2015
2014 or
2013.11.2014.
Under a Stockholder Rights Plan adopted by the Board of Directors on November 24, 2008, each share of common stock includes one right to purchase from the Company a unit consisting of one
one-hundredthhundredth of a share (a “Fractional Share”) of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at a specific purchase price per Fractional Share, subject to adjustment in certain events. The rights will cause substantial dilution to any person or group that attempts to acquire the Company without the approval of the Company’s Board of Directors.
12.
15. Stock-Based Compensation and Stock Awards
On May 13, 2004, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2004 Incentive Plan of Dril-Quip, Inc. (as amended in 2012 and approved by the Company’s stockholders on May 10, 2012, the “2004 Plan”), which reserved up to 2,696,294 shares of common stock to be used in connection with the 2004 Plan. Persons eligible for awards under the 2004 Plan are employees holding positions of responsibility with the Company or any of its subsidiaries and members of the Board of Directors. Options granted under the 2004 Plan have a term of ten years and become exercisable in cumulative annual increments of one-fourth of the total number of shares of common stock subject thereto, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of the grant.
The fair value of stock options granted was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expected life was based on the Company’s historical trends, and volatility is based on the historical volatility over the expected life of the options. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury yield curve at the grant date. The Company does not pay dividends and, therefore, there is no assumed dividend yield.
Option activity for the year ended December 31,
20152016 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Number of
Options | | | Weighted
Average
Price | | | Aggregate
intrinsic value
(in millions) | | | Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in years) | |
Outstanding at December 31, 2014 | | | 459,247 | | | | 55.86 | | | | | | | | | |
Granted | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | | (38,500 | ) | | | 56.37 | | | | | | | | | |
Forfeited | | | (5,625 | ) | | | 68.23 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 | | | 415,122 | | | $ | 55.64 | | | $ | 3.4 | | | | 4.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable at December 31, 2015 | | | 415,122 | | | $ | 55.64 | | | $ | 3.4 | | | | 4.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Options | | Weighted Average Price | | Aggregate intrinsic value (in millions) | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2015 | 415,122 |
| | 55.64 |
| | | | |
| Granted | — |
| | — |
| | | | |
| Exercised | (54,350 | ) | | 40.61 |
| | | | |
| Forfeited | (8,813 | ) | | 67.71 |
| | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2016 | 351,959 |
| | $ | 57.66 |
| | $ | 2.5 |
| | 3.5 |
| Exercisable at December 31, 2016 | 351,959 |
| | $ | 57.66 |
| | $ | 2.5 |
| | 3.5 |
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised in
2016, 2015
and 2014
and 2013 was
$751,000, $2.0$1.0 million, $0.8 million and
$10.7$2.0 million, respectively. The income tax benefit realized from stock options exercised was
$357,000, $263,000
$718,000 and
$3.7 million$718,000 for the years ended December 31,
2016, 2015
2014 and
2013,2014, respectively. There were no anti-dilutive stock option shares on December 31,
2015.2016.
Stock-based compensation is recognized as selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. For the year ended December 31, 2016, there was no stock-based compensation expense
for stock option awards. During the years ended December 31, 2015
2014 and
2013,2014, stock-based compensation expense for stock option awards
totaledwas $1.1 million
$2.5 million and
$3.4$2.5 million, respectively. No stock-based compensation expense was capitalized during
2016, 2015
2014 or 2013.and 2014.
Options granted to employees vest over four years and the Company recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options. At December 31,
2015,2016, there was no unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested stock
options.options as all outstanding options were fully vested.
On October 28,
20152016 and
2014,2015, pursuant to the 2004 Plan, the Company awarded officers, directors and key employees restricted stock awards
(RSA)(RSAs), which is an award of common stock subject to time vesting. In May 2012, the Board of Directors amended the 2004 Plan to include non-employee directors as eligible for RSAs. The awards issued under the 2004 Plan are restricted as to transference, sale and other disposition. These RSAs vest ratably over a three year period. The RSAs may also vest in case of a change of control. Upon termination, whether voluntary or involuntary, the RSAs that have not vested will be returned to the Company resulting in stock forfeitures. The fair market value of the stock on the date of grant is amortized and charged to selling, general and administrative expense over the stipulated time period over which the RSAs vest on a straight-line basis, net of estimated forfeitures.
The Company’s RSA activity and related information is presented below:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | RSA
Number of
Shares | | | Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share | |
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2014 | | | 160,154 | | | $ | 93.78 | |
Granted | | | 123,224 | | | | 66.02 | |
Vested | | | (79,797 | ) | | | 89.10 | |
Forfeited | | | (9,985 | ) | | | 96.29 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2015 | | | 193,596 | | | $ | 77.91 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Restricted stock awards
|
| | | | | | |
| | RSA Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share |
| Nonvested balance at December 31, 2015 | 193,596 |
| | $ | 77.91 |
|
| Granted | 165,063 |
| | 48.45 |
|
| Vested | (84,513 | ) | | 84.98 |
|
| Forfeited | (4,763 | ) | | 80.60 |
|
| Nonvested balance at December 31, 2016 | 269,383 |
| | $ | 57.59 |
|
RSA compensation expense for the
yearyears ended December 31,
2016 and 2015 totaled $7.2 million and $6.3 million for
20142014. For 2016, 2015 and
$3.9 million for 2013. For 2015, 2014,
and 2013, the income tax benefit recognized in net income for RSAs was
$1.2 million, $1.8 million
$2.2 million and
$2.0$2.2 million, respectively. As of December 31,
2015,2016, there was $14.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested RSAs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.62.2 years. There were
96,100108,561 anti-dilutive restricted shares on December 31,
2015.2016.
On October 28,
2016 and 2015,
and 2014,pursuant to the 2004 Plan, the Company awarded
67,346 and 45,729 performance unit awards (Performance Units)
, respectively, pursuant to the 2004 Plan to officers and key employees. The Performance Units were valued based on a Monte Carlo simulation at
$53.46 for the 2016 grants and $79.00 for
the 2015 grants,
approximately 110.3% and
$126.84 for the 2014 grants, approximately 120.2%
and 139.4%, respectively, of the grant share price. Under the plan, participants may earn from 0% to 200% of their target award based upon the Company’s relative total share return (TSR) in comparison to the 15 component companies of the Philadelphia Oil Service Index. The TSR is calculated over a
three year period from October 1, 20142015 and 20152016 to September 30, 20172018 and 20182019, respectively, and assumes reinvestment of dividends for companies within the index that pay dividends, which Dril-Quip does not. Assumptions used in the Monte Carlo simulation are as follows:
| | | | |
| | | 2014 | | 2015 |
Grant date | | October 28, 2014 | | October 28, 2015 |
Performance period | | October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2017 | | October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2018 |
Volatility | | 27.8% | | 29.5% |
Risk-free interest rate | | 0.8081% | | 0.9795% |
Grant date price | | $91.02 | | $65.72 |
|
| | |
| | 2015 | 2016 |
| Grant date | October 28, 2015 | October 28, 2016 |
| Performance period | October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2018 | October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2019 |
| Volatility | 29.5% | 32.5% |
| Risk-free interest rate | 0.9795% | 1.0100% |
| Grant date price | $65.72 | $48.45 |
The Company’s Performance Unit activity and related information is presented below:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Number of
Performance
Units | | | Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per
Unit | |
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2014 | | | 123,786 | | | $ | 113.98 | |
Granted | | | 67,346 | | | | 79.25 | |
Vested | | | (48,086 | ) | | | 84.66 | |
Forfeited | | | (3,478 | ) | | | 114.50 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2015 | | | 139,568 | | | $ | 107.31 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | Number of Performance Units | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Unit |
| Nonvested balance at December 31, 2015 | 135,969 |
| | $ | 106.49 |
|
| Granted | 87,503 |
| | 53.46 |
|
| Vested | (27,253 | ) | | 138.31 |
|
| Forfeited | — |
| | — |
|
| Nonvested balance at December 31, 2016 | 196,219 |
| | $ | 78.42 |
|
Performance Unit compensation expense was
$4.5$4.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2016, $4.5 million for 2015
and $3.1 million for
20142014. For 2016, 2015 and
$1.6 million for 2013. For 2015, 2014,
and 2013, the income tax benefit recognized in net income for Performance Units was
$462,000, $1.1 million
none and none, respectively. As of December 31,
2015,2016, there was
$9.3$8.9 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested Performance Units which is to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.62.1 years. There were
57,20064,546 anti-dilutive Performance Units at December 31,
2015.2016.
Director Stock Compensation Awards
In June 2014, the Board of Directors authorized a stock compensation program for the directors pursuant to the 2004 Plan. Under this program, the Directors may elect to receive all or a portion of their fees in the form of restricted stock awards (DSA) in an amount equal to 125% of the fees in lieu of cash. The awards are made quarterly on the first business day after the end of each calendar quarter and vest on January 1 on the second year after the grant date.
The Company DSA activity for December 31,
20152016 is presented below:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | DSA Number of
Shares | | | Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per
Share | |
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2014 | | | 1,204 | | | $ | 89.40 | |
Granted | | | 6,843 | | | | 68.73 | |
Vested | | | (1,885 | ) | | | 72.00 | |
Forfeited | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2015 | | | 6,162 | | | $ | 71.77 | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | DSA Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share |
| Nonvested balance at December 31, 2015 | 6,162 |
| | $ | 71.77 |
|
| Granted | 8,174 |
| | 58.47 |
|
| Vested | (914 | ) | | 89.39 |
|
| Forfeited | — |
| | — |
|
| Nonvested balance at December 31, 2016 | 13,422 |
| | $ | 62.46 |
|
Director stock compensation awards expense for
20152016 was
$328,000$405,000 as compared to
$328,000 for 2015 and $21,600 for 2014. For
2016, 2015 and 2014, the income tax benefit recognized in net income for DSAs was
$19,000, $41,000 and none, respectively. There was
$225,000$300,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested DSAs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of one year. There were
4502,162 anti-diluted DSA shares on December 31,
2015.2016.
The following table summarizes information for equity compensation plans in effect as of December 31,
2015: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options(1) | | | Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options | | | Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plan
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a)) | |
Plan category | | (a) | | | (b) | | | (c) | |
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock options | | | 415,122 | | | $ | 55.64 | | | | 441,914 | |
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 415,122 | | | $ | 55.64 | | | | 441,914 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options(1) | | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plan (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
| Plan category | (a) | | (b) | | (c) |
| Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders | | | | | |
| Stock options | 351,959 |
| | $ | 57.66 |
| | 184,773 |
|
| Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | 351,959 |
| | $ | 57.66 |
| | 184,773 |
|
| |
| (1) | Excludes 199,758282,805 shares of unvested RSAs and DSAs and 139,568196,219 of unvested Performance Units, which were granted pursuant to the 2004 Plan approved by the stockholders. |
13.
The following is a reconciliation of the basic and diluted earnings per share computation.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2015 | | | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
| | | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Net income | | $ | 192,008 | | | $ | 208,712 | | | $ | 169,827 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding | | | 38,364 | | | | 39,964 | | | | 40,648 | |
Effect of dilutive securities—stock options and awards | | | 167 | | | | 226 | | | | 217 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total shares and dilutive securities | | | 38,531 | | | | 40,190 | | | | 40,865 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings per common share | | $ | 5.00 | | | $ | 5.22 | | | $ | 4.18 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Diluted earnings per common share | | $ | 4.98 | | | $ | 5.19 | | | $ | 4.16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
14.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| Net income | $ | 93,221 |
| | $ | 192,008 |
| | $ | 208,712 |
|
| Weighted average basic common shares outstanding | 37,537 |
| | 38,364 |
| | 39,964 |
|
| Effect of dilutive securities—stock options and awards | 130 |
| | 167 |
| | 226 |
|
| Total shares and dilutive securities | 37,667 |
| | 38,531 |
| | 40,190 |
|
| Basic earnings per common share | $ | 2.48 |
| | $ | 5.00 |
| | $ | 5.22 |
|
| Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 2.47 |
| | $ | 4.98 |
| | $ | 5.19 |
|
17. Stock Repurchase Plan
Under two separate share repurchase plans approved by its Board of Directors, the Company repurchased and cancelled 2,023,172 shares for a total cost of $190 million during 2014. On February 26, 2015, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan under which the Company
iswas authorized to repurchase up to $100 million of its common stock.
As of December 31, 2015, theThe Company
had repurchased
and cancelled 1,184,700 shares
in 2015 at an average cost of $63.98 per share for a total cost of $75.8 million.
15. During the first six months of 2016, the Company repurchased 400,500 shares under this plan at an average cost of $60.51 per share for a total cost of $24.2 million, to conclude all repurchases under the February 26, 2015 plan. All repurchased shares were subsequently cancelled.
On July 26, 2016, the Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase plan under which the Company can repurchase up to $100 million of its common stock. The repurchase plan has no set expiration date and any repurchased shares are expected to be cancelled. No repurchases have been made pursuant to this plan as of December 31, 2016.
18. Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Quarter Ended | |
| | | March 31 | | | June 30 | | | Sept. 30 | | | Dec. 31 | |
| | | (In thousands, except per share data) | |
| | | (Unaudited) | |
2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 226,002 | | | $ | 215,276 | | | $ | 201,402 | | | $ | 201,630 | |
Cost of sales | | | 125,138 | | | | 117,664 | | | | 108,132 | | | | 108,352 | |
Gross profit | | | 100,864 | | | | 97,612 | | | | 93,270 | | | | 93,278 | |
Operating income | | | 71,693 | | | | 52,579 | | | | 64,255 | | | | 60,308 | |
Net income | | | 53,664 | | | | 39,213 | | | | 50,777 | | | | 48,354 | |
Earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic(1) | | $ | 1.38 | | | $ | 1.01 | | | $ | 1.32 | | | $ | 1.28 | |
Diluted(1) | | | 1.38 | | | | 1.01 | | | | 1.32 | | | | 1.28 | |
2014 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 204,073 | | | $ | 230,315 | | | $ | 241,750 | | | $ | 254,819 | |
Cost of sales | | | 110,787 | | | | 124,993 | | | | 135,250 | | | | 142,497 | |
Gross profit | | | 93,286 | | | | 105,322 | | | | 106,500 | | | | 112,322 | |
Operating income | | | 58,567 | | | | 68,954 | | | | 72,992 | | | | 78,235 | |
Net income | | | 42,618 | | | | 51,324 | | | | 55,683 | | | | 59,087 | |
Earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic(1) | | $ | 1.05 | | | $ | 1.27 | | | $ | 1.41 | | | $ | 1.51 | |
Diluted(1) | | | 1.04 | | | | 1.27 | | | | 1.40 | | | | 1.50 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended |
| | March 31 | | June 30 | | Sept. 30 | | Dec. 31 |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) (Unaudited) |
| 2016 | | | | | | | |
| Revenues | $ | 166,561 |
| | $ | 142,439 |
| | $ | 123,640 |
| | $ | 106,091 |
|
| Cost of sales | 93,096 |
| | 79,881 |
| | 77,633 |
| | 77,794 |
|
| Gross profit | 73,465 |
| | 62,558 |
| | 46,007 |
| | 28,297 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | 49,343 |
| | 45,217 |
| | 22,933 |
| | (4,634 | ) |
| Net income | 36,769 |
| | 36,137 |
| | 19,013 |
| | 1,302 |
|
| Earnings per share: | | | | | | | |
Basic(1) | $ | 0.97 |
| | $ | 0.96 |
| | $ | 0.51 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
|
Diluted(1) | 0.97 |
| | 0.96 |
| | 0.51 |
| | 0.03 |
|
| 2015 | | | | | | | |
| Revenues | $ | 226,002 |
| | $ | 215,276 |
| | $ | 201,402 |
| | $ | 201,630 |
|
| Cost of sales | 125,138 |
| | 117,664 |
| | 108,132 |
| | 108,352 |
|
| Gross profit | 100,864 |
| | 97,612 |
| | 93,270 |
| | 93,278 |
|
| Operating income | 71,693 |
| | 52,579 |
| | 64,255 |
| | 60,308 |
|
| Net income | 53,664 |
| | 39,213 |
| | 50,777 |
| | 48,354 |
|
| Earnings per share: | | | | | | | |
Basic(1) | $ | 1.38 |
| | $ | 1.01 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
| | $ | 1.28 |
|
Diluted(1) | 1.38 |
| | 1.01 |
| | 1.32 |
| | 1.28 |
|
| |
| (1) | The sum of the quarterly per share amounts may not equal the annual amount reported, as per share amounts are computed independently for each quarter and for the full year. |
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
19. Subsequent Event
On May 28, 2014, our Audit Committee dismissed BDO USA, LLP (BDO),January 6, 2017, the Company acquired The Technologies Alliance Inc. d/b/a OilPatch Technologies (OPT) for $20.0 million. The purchase price was subject to closing adjustments and appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), as Dril-Quip’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014.was funded with cash on hand. The reports of BDOacquisition and purchase price allocation do not meet the significant subsidiary test outlined in Regulation S-X Rule 1-02. Therefore, the Company does not expect the acquisition to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements asCompany's Consolidated Balance Sheets. OPT's results of andoperations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 didperiods prior to this acquisition were not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the subsequent interim period through May 28, 2014, there were no disagreements with BDO on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolvedmaterial to the satisfactionCompany's Consolidated Statements of BDO, would have caused BDO to make reference theretoOperations.
Item 9. Changes in their reportsand Disagreements With Accountants on the financial statements for such years. In addition, none of the “reportable events” described in Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item
304 of Regulation S-K occurred with respect to the Company during the years ended December 31, 20139A. Controls and
2012 and the subsequent interim period through May 28, 2014.During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and the subsequent interim period through May 28, 2014, neither the Company nor anyone acting on our behalf consulted PwC regarding (1) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on Dril-Quip’s financial statements; or (2) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement as defined in Item 304 of Regulation S-K or a “reportable event” as described in Item 304 of Regulation S-K.
Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
Procedures
In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31,
20152016 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
“Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” appears on page 44 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
There has been no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended December 31,
20152016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Item 9B. | Other Information |
None.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this item is set forth under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance Matters” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement (the
“2016“2017 Proxy Statement”) for its annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May
13, 2016,12, 2017, which sections are incorporated herein by reference.
Pursuant to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K, the information required by this item with respect to executive officers of the Company is set forth in Part I of this report.
Item 11. | Executive Compensation |
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is set forth in the sections entitled “Director Compensation,” “Executive Compensation” and “Corporate Governance Matters” in the
20162017 Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item is set forth in the sections entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Executive Compensation—Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the
20162017 Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item is set forth in the section entitled “Corporate Governance Matters” in the
20162017 Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item is set forth in the sections entitled “Approval of Appointment of Independent Public Accounting Firm—Fees” and “—Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy for Audit and Non-Audit Services” in the
20162017 Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) Financial Statements
All financial statements of the registrant are set forth under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Balance at
beginning of
period | | | Charges to costs
and expenses | | | Recoveries
and write
offs | | | Balance at end
of period | |
| | | (In thousands) | |
Allowance for doubtful trade receivables | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2015 | | $ | 6,241 | | | $ | 5,741 | | | $ | (4,243 | ) | | $ | 7,739 | |
December 31, 2014 | | | 2,364 | | | | 4,832 | | | | (955 | ) | | | 6,241 | |
December 31, 2013 | | | 2,113 | | | | 910 | | | | (659 | ) | | | 2,364 | |
Allowance for excess and slow moving inventory | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2015 | | $ | 34,607 | | | $ | 8,512 | | | $ | (3,872 | ) | | $ | 39,247 | |
December 31, 2014 | | | 33,216 | | | | 3,951 | | | | (2,560 | ) | | | 34,607 | |
December 31, 2013 | | | 30,426 | | | | 3,554 | | | | (764 | ) | | | 33,216 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Description | | Balance at
beginning of
period | | Charges to costs
and expenses | | Recoveries
and write
offs | | Balance at end
of period |
| | | (In thousands) |
| Allowance for doubtful trade receivables | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2016 | | $ | 7,739 |
| | $ | 1,259 |
| | $ | (3,428 | ) | | $ | 5,570 |
|
| December 31, 2015 | | 6,241 |
| | 5,741 |
| | (4,243 | ) | | 7,739 |
|
| December 31, 2014 | | 2,364 |
| | 4,832 |
| | (955 | ) | | 6,241 |
|
| Allowance for excess and slow moving inventory | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2016 | | $ | 39,247 |
| | $ | 5,748 |
| | $ | 653 |
| | $ | 45,648 |
|
| December 31, 2015 | | 34,607 |
| | 8,512 |
| | (3,872 | ) | | 39,247 |
|
| December 31, 2014 | | 33,216 |
| | 3,951 |
| | (2,560 | ) | | 34,607 |
|
All other financial schedules are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is presented in the financial statements or notes thereto.
Dril-Quip will furnish any exhibit to a stockholder upon payment by the stockholder of the Company’s reasonable expenses to furnish the exhibit.
|
| | | | |
Exhibit No. | | Description |
| | |
*3.1 | | | | |
| *2.1 | | — | | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 14, 2016, by and between Pearce Industries, Inc. and the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 17, 2016). |
| | | | |
| *3.1 | | — | | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 20, 2014). |
| | | | |
*3.2*3.2 | | — | | Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 25, 2008). |
| | | | |
*3.3*3.3 | | — | | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 20, 2014). |
| | | | |
*4.1*4.1 | | — | | Form of certificate representing Common Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (RegistrationNo. 333-33447)). |
| | |
*4.2 | | | | |
| *4.2 | | — | | Rights Agreement dated as of November 24, 2008 between Dril-Quip, Inc. and Mellon Investor Services LLC, as Rights Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 25, 2008). |
| | | | |
Exhibit No.
| | Description
| | |
| | |
*+*+10.1 | | — | | Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr. DeBerry (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2011). |
| | |
*+*+10.2 | | — | | Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr. Gariepy (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2011). |
| | |
*+*+10.3 | | — | | Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr. Brooks (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2011). |
| | |
*+*+10.4 | | — | | Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr. Webster (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2011). |
| | |
*+*+10.5 | | — | | Amended and Restated 2004 Incentive Plan of Dril-Quip, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Proxy Statement filed on April 6, 2012). |
| | | | |
*+*+10.6 | | — | | Short-Term Incentive Plan of Dril-Quip, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit B to the Company’s Proxy Statement filed on April 6, 2012). |
| | | | |
*+*+10.7 | | — | | Form of Standard Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 19, 2008). |
| | | | |
*+*+10.8 | | — | | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2011). |
| | | | |
*+*+10.9 | | — | | Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Directors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012). |
| | | | |
| **+10.10 | | — | | Summary of Executive Officer and Non-employee Director Compensation. |
| | | | |
*10.11*10.11 | | — | | Contract for Goods and Services dated August 20, 2012 between Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. and Dril-Quip do Brasil LTDA (English translation) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012). |
|
| | | | |
*+ | | | | |
| *+10.12 | | — | | 2012 Performance Unit Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 19, 2012). |
| | | | |
*+*+10.13 | | — | | Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on January 18, 2012). |
| | | | |
*+*+10.14 | | — | | 2013 Performance Unit Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2013). |
| | | | |
*+*+10.15 | | — | | Stock Compensation Program for Directors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014). |
| | | | |
*+*+10.16 | | — | | Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 12, 2015). |
| | | | |
| *10.17 | | — | | Amendment to Contract #4600368806, dated as of July 29, 2016, between Petróleo Brasileiro S.A., the Company and Dril-Quip do Brasil LTDA (English translation) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016). |
** | | | | |
| *10.18 | | — | | Extrajudicial Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2016, between Petróleo Brasileiro S.A., the Company and Dril-Quip do Brazil LTDA (English translation) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016).
|
| | | | |
| **21.1 | | — | | Subsidiaries of the Registrant. |
| | | | |
****23.1 | | — | | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. |
| | |
**23.2 | | — | | Consent of BDO USA, LLP. |
| | | | |
Exhibit No.
| | Description
|
| | |
****31.1 | | — | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Blake T. DeBerry. |
| | | | |
****31.2 | | — | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Jerry M. Brooks. |
| | | | |
****32.1 | | — | | Section 1350 Certification of Blake T. DeBerry. |
| | | | |
****32.2 | | — | | Section 1350 Certification of Jerry M. Brooks. |
| | | | |
| **101.INS | | — | | XBRL Instance Document |
| | | | |
| **101.SCH | | — | | XBRL Schema Document |
| | | | |
| **101.CAL | | — | | XBRL Calculation Document |
| | | | |
| **101.DEF | | — | | XBRL Definition Linkbase Document |
| | | | |
| **101.LAB | | — | | XBRL Label Linkbase Document |
| | | | |
| **101.PRE | | — | | XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document |
| | | | |
| * | Incorporated herein by reference as indicated. |
| | | | |
| ** | Filed with this report. |
| | | | |
| + | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K. |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on February
25, 2016.28, 2017. |
| | |
| DRIL-QUIP, INC. |
| |
| By: | | /S/ BLAKE T. DEBERRY |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | |
Name | | Capacity | | Date |
| | |
/S/ JOHN V. LOVOI
JOHN V. LOVOI
| | | | |
/S/ JOHN V. LOVOI | | Chairman of the Board | | February 25, 201628, 2017 |
| | |
/S/ BLAKE T. DEBERRY
BLAKE T. DEBERRY
JOHN V. LOVOI | | |
/S/ BLAKE T. DEBERRY | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | | February 25, 201628, 2017 |
| | |
/S/ JERRY M. BROOKS
JERRY M. BROOKS
BLAKE T. DEBERRY | | |
/S/ JERRY M. BROOKS | | Vice President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | | February 25, 201628, 2017 |
| JERRY M. BROOKS | | |
/S/ A.P. SHUKISA.P. SHUKIS
| | Director | | February 25, 201628, 2017 |
| | |
/S/ TERENCE B. JUPP
TERENCE B. JUPP
A.P. SHUKIS | | |
/S/ TERENCE B. JUPP | | Director | | February 25, 201628, 2017 |
| | |
/S/ STEVEN L. NEWMAN
STEVEN L. NEWMAN
TERENCE B. JUPP | | |
/S/ STEVEN L. NEWMAN | | Director | | February 25, 201628, 2017 |
| STEVEN L. NEWMAN | | |