UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORMFORM 10-K

 

 

 

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152018

OR

 

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number000-14656

 

 

REPLIGEN CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware 04-2729386

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

41 Seyon Street, Bldg. 1, Suite 100

Waltham, MA

 02453
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(781) 250-0111

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share

Name of Exchange on Which Registered

The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x.☐.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x.☒.

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨.☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨.☐.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of RegulationS-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K.    x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filerx Accelerated filer  ¨  Non-acceleratedAccelerated filer¨ 
Non-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company¨
   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Emerging growth company 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x.☒.

The aggregate market value of the voting andnon-voting common equity held bynon-affiliates as of June 30, 2015,29, 2018, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $1,348,697,533.$1,569,493,598.

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of February 18, 201622, 2019 was 33,031,533.43,921,488.

Documents Incorporated By Reference

The registrant intends to file a proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2018. Portions of such proxy statement are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form10-K.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

 

      PAGE 
Forward-looking Statements1

PART I

    

Item 1.

  

Business

   12 

Item 1A.

  

Risk Factors

   1011��

Item 1B.

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

   2125 

Item 2.

  

Properties

   2126 

Item 3.

  

Legal Proceedings

   2126 

Item 4.

  

Mine Safety Disclosures

   2126 

PART II

    

Item 5.

  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   2227 

Item 6.

  

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

   2529 

Item 7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   2630 

Item 7A.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   3844 

Item 8.

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   3844 

Item 9.

  

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   3844 

Item 9A.

  

Controls and Procedures

   3844 

Item 9B.

  

Other Information

   4147 

PART III

     4248 

PART IV

    

Item 15.

  

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

49

Item 16.

10-K Summary51

SIGNATURES

   43

SIGNATURES

4752 


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form10-K (“Form10-K”) contains forward-looking statements which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The forward-looking statements in this Form10-K do not constitute guarantees of future performance. Investors are cautioned that express or implied statements in this Form10-K that are not strictly historical statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding current or future financial performance, potential impairment of future earnings, management’s strategy, plans and objectives for future operations or acquisitions, product development and sales, research and development, selling, general and administrative expenditures, intellectual property and adequacy of capital resources and financing plans constitute forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, including, without limitation, the risks identified under the caption “Risk Factors” and other risks detailed in this Form10-K and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking information contained in this Form10-K, except as required by law.

PART I

 

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

The following discussion of our business contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. When used in this report, the words “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan” and “expect” and similar expressions as they relate to us are included to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements and are a result of certain factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report onForm 10-K.

References throughout this Annual Report on Form10-K to “Repligen”, “we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Company” refer to Repligen Corporation and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, unless the context otherwise indicates.

Overview

Repligen Corporation (“Repligen,” the “Company” or “we”) is a leading provider of advanced bioprocessing company focused on the development, productiontechnologies and commercialization of innovative productssolutions used in the process of manufacturing biologic drugs. Our products are made to substantially increase biopharmaceutical manufacturing efficiencies and flexibility. As the global biologics market continues to experience strong growth and expansion, our customers – primarily large biopharmaceutical companies and contract manufacturing organizations – face critical production cost, capacity, quality and time pressures that our products are made to address. Our commitment to bioprocessing is helping to set new standards for the way our customers manufacture biologic drugs, including monoclonal antibodies (“bioprocessing”mAb”). Biologic, recombinant proteins, vaccines and gene therapies. We are dedicated to inspiring advances in bioprocessing as a trusted partner in the production of biologic drugs that improve human health worldwide.

We currently operate as one bioprocessing business, with a comprehensive suite of products to serve both upstream and downstream processes in biologic drug manufacturing. Building on over 35 years of industry expertise, we have developed a broad and diversified product portfolio that reflects our commitment to build abest-in-class bioprocessing technology company with a world-class direct sales and commercial organization.

We are committed to capitalizing on growth opportunities and maximizing the value of our product platform through both organic growth initiatives (internal innovation and commercial leverage) and targeted acquisitions.

Our Products

Our bioprocessing business is comprised of three main product lines – Chromatography, Filtration and Proteins.

Direct-to-Customer Products (Chromatography and Filtration)

Since 2012, we have significantly expanded ourdirect-to-customer presence through our Chromatography and Filtration product lines, which include monoclonaldifferentiated products and systems. We have diversified and grown ourdirect-to-customer product offering through internal innovation and through disciplined, accretive acquisitions of assets or businesses that leverage existing product lines and/or expand our customer and geographic scope.

To support our sales goals for ourdirect-to-consumer products, we have invested in our commercial organization. Our commercial and research and development teams work to effectively launch new products and applications, as well as build new markets for acquired technologies that increase flexibility and convenience while streamlining biomanufacturing workflow for our customers. In addition, to meet increased demand for our products, we continue to invest in increasing the volume and scale of manufacturing at our facilities in the United States, Sweden and Germany.

Chromatography

Our Chromatography product line includes a number of products used in the downstream purification and quality control of biological drugs. The main driver of growth in this portfolio is our lab and process-scale OPUS®pre-packed chromatography (“PPC”) column line.

Our other products include chromatography resins (such as CaptivA®) used in a small number of commercial drug processes and ELISA test kits used by quality control departments to detect and measure the presence of leached Protein A and/or growth factor in the final product.

OPUS®

Our Chromatography product line features PPC columns under our OPUS brand. OPUS columns, which we deliver to our customerspre-packed with their choice of chromatography resin, are single-campaign(“single-use”) disposable columns that replace the use of traditional and more permanent glass columns used in downstream purification processes. By designing OPUS to be a technologically advanced and flexible option for the purification of biologics from process development through clinical-scale and some commercial manufacturing, Repligen has become a leader in the PPC market. The customization andready-to-use nature of our OPUS columns makes them ideal for purification of antibodies, recombinant proteins and vaccinesvaccines. Biomanufacturers value the time savings, labor and represent a growing areautility cost savings, product consistency and the “plug and play” convenience of drug development. Our customers include leading life sciences companies, global biopharmaceutical companies,OPUS.

We launched our first production-scale OPUS columns in 2012 and contract manufacturers worldwide. The high-value technologies thathave since added larger diameter options such as OPUS 45 and OPUS 60. Early in 2018, we provide enable biologics manufacturers to cost-effectively increase drug production yields while retainingintroduced OPUS 80 R, the highest quality and safety standards.

Repligen is a longtime global market leader in the manufacture of Protein A ligands, sold to life sciences companies under long term supply agreements. Protein A is a critical reagent used to purify monoclonal antibodies (“mAbs”)largest available PPC on the market, (over 50)for use in late-stage clinical or select commercial purification processes. We have also introduced next-generation features such as a resin recovery port on our larger columns. This allows our customers to reuse the recovered resin in development (over 300). In December 2011, we strengthenedother applications. The unpacking port feature was made available in the first quarter of 2017 on our Protein A market leadership with thelargest production-scale OPUS columns.

Through our acquisition of Novozymes’s bioprocessing business (“Novozymes”)Atoll GmbH in Lund, Sweden (the “Novozymes Acquisition”).2016, we established a customer-facing center in Europe and expanded our portfolio to include our smaller-scale columns, named OPUS PD, that are used in high-throughput process development screening, viral validation studies and scale down validation of chromatography processes. We maintain a broad and customizable PPC product line to meet our customers’ diverse needs.

We establishedOther Chromatography

Also included in our Chromatography portfolio are ELISA kits, which are analytical test kits to detect the presence of proteins and have executed ongrowth factors, and chromatography resins, including our CaptivA® brand. In addition, following our acquisition of Spectrum in 2017, we sell Spectra/Chrom® liquid chromatography products as part of our Chromatography product line.

Filtration

XCell ATF

Our Filtration products offer a diversification strategy to selectively expand the number of bioprocessing products that we sell directlyadvantages to end users. With the Novozymes Acquisition, we gained a portfolio of growth factors, led by LONG® R3 IGF-1, which is used in cell culture media to increase productivity. LONG®R3 IGF-1 is sold in collaboration with MilliporeSigma (formerly Sigma Aldrich), our exclusive distributor for the product. We also developed and directly market our OPUS® process-scale line of pre-packed chromatography columns for the capture and purificationmanufacturers of biologic drugs inat volumes that span from pilot studies to clinical development. Most recently, in June 2014, we acquired the businessand commercial-scale production. We first established our Filtration product line through our acquisition of Refine Technology, including Refine’sXCell Alternating Tangential Flow (“ATF”) System,assets from Refine Technology (“Refine”) in 2014. XCell ATF systems are used primarily in upstream perfusion, or “continuous manufacturing”, processes.

XCell ATF is a best-in-classtechnologically advanced filtration device used in upstream processes to generate extremely high cell concentrationscontinuously remove cellular metabolic waste products during the course of a fermentation step ofrun, freeing healthy cells to continue producing the biologic drug manufacturing process (the “Refine Business”of interest. XCell ATF was designed to both increase the density of cells in a bioreactor and extend the acquisitionproduction run. By continuously removing waste products from the fermenter, the XCell ATF System routinely increases cell densities to2- or3-times the levels achieved by standard batch fermentation. As a result, product yield is increased, which improves facility utilization and can reduce the size of a bioreactor required to manufacture a given volume of biologic drug product. This is important to biomanufacturers who seek to maximize output from their existing facilities. XCell ATF Systems are suitable for use in laboratory andscale-up all the way to production bioreactors as large as 2,000 liters.

Through internal innovation, we developed and in 2016 launchedsingle-use formats of the Refine Business,original stainless steel XCell ATF device to address increasing industry demand for“plug-and-play” technology. The XCell ATF device is now available to customers in both its original configuration (steel housing and replaceable filters) in all sizes (2, 4, 6 and 10), and/or as asingle-use device (disposable housing/filter combination) in most sizes (2, 6, and 10). The availability of XCell ATF in asingle-use format eliminates the “Refine Acquisition”pre-use workflow associated with autoclaving, leading to an 80% reduction in implementation time. Thesingle-use format also enables our customers to accelerate evaluations of the product with a lower initial overall cost of ownership. Based on strong demand, we have continued to expand thesingle-use XCell ATF offering.

In September 2018, we entered into a collaboration agreement with industry leader Sartorius Stedim Biotech (“SSB”). to integrate our XCell ATF controller technology into SSB’s BIOSTAT® STR large-scale,single-use bioreactors, to create novel perfusion-enabled bioreactors.

SIUS Tangential Flow Filters (TangenX)

In December 2016, we acquired TangenX Technology Corporation (“TangenX”), balancing our upstream XCell ATF offering with a downstream portfolio of flat-sheet tangential flow filters (“TFF”) and cassettes used in downstream biologic drug purification and formulation processes. The TangenX portfolio includes oursingle-use SIUS TFF brand, providing customers with a high-performance,low-cost alternative to reusable TFF cassettes.

TFF is a rapid and efficient method for separation and purification of biomolecules that is widely used in laboratory, process development and process scale applications in biopharmaceutical manufacturing. SIUS is an innovativesingle-use TFF line of cassettes and hardware forlab-scale through large-scale biopharmaceutical manufacturing.Single-use SIUS TFF cassettes with enclosed flat sheet membranes are designed to provide a high performing membrane at significantly lower product and labor costs than reusable TFF products. Each disposable cassette is deliveredpre-sanitized, integrity tested and ready to be equilibrated and used for tangential flow diafiltration and ultrafiltration processing. Use of SIUS TFF cassettes eliminatesnon-value added steps of cleaning and flushing required in reusable TFF products. The cassettes are interchangeable with filter hardware from multiple manufacturers, simplifying customer trial and adoption of SIUS products.

KrosFlo®, ProConnex® (Spectrum Life Sciences LLC)

We marketacquired Spectrum Life Sciences LLC (“Spectrum”) and its subsidiaries in August 2017 to strengthen our filtration business with the addition of a leading portfolio of hollow-fiber (HF) filters and modules,single-use flow path connectors and TFF filtration systems. Spectrum products globallyare used inbench-top through acommercial-scale processes, primarily for the filtration, isolation, purification and concentration of biologics and diagnostic products. Our Spectrum filtration products offer both standard and customized solutions to bioprocessing customers, with particular strength in consumable andsingle-use offerings.

With the addition of Spectrum, we nowin-house manufacture hollow-fiber filters that can be used in our XCell ATF system. In addition, we increased our direct commercial organizationsales presence in the U.S., Europe and Asia, and we diversified our end markets beyond monoclonal antibodies to include vaccines, recombinant protein and gene therapies.

Our Spectrum filtration brands include the KrosFlo® line of hollow-fiber cartridges and TFF systems, the Spectra/Por® portfolio of laboratory and process dialysis products andPro-Connex®single-use hollow-fiberModule-Bag-Tubing sets.

In 2018, we introduced our KONDUiT device to automate concentration and buffer exchange to be used in conjunction with our hollow fiber or flat sheet TFF filtration products.

OEM Products (Proteins)

Our OEM products are represented by our Protein A affinity ligands, which are a critical component of Protein A chromatography resins used in downstream purification, and cell culture growth factor products, which are a key component of cell culture media used upstream to increase cell density in a bioreactor and improve product yield.

Protein A/Ligands

We are a leading provider of Protein A affinity ligands to life sciences companies. Protein A ligands are an essential “binding” component of Protein A chromatography resins used in the purification of virtually all monoclonal antibody based drugs on the market or in development. We manufacture multiple forms of Protein A ligands under long-term supply agreements with major life sciences companies including GE Healthcare, MilliporeSigma and Purolite Life Sciences (“Purolite”), who in turn sell their Protein A chromatography resins to end users (“mAb manufacturers”). We have two manufacturing sites supporting overall global demand for our Protein A ligands: one in Lund, Sweden and another in Waltham, Massachusetts.

Protein A chromatography resins are considered the industry standard for purification of antibody-based therapeutics due to the ability of the Protein A ligand to very selectively bind to or “capture” antibodies from crude protein mixtures. Protein A resins are packed into the first chromatography column of typically three columns used in a mAb purification process. As a result of Protein A’s high affinity for antibodies, the mAb product is highly purified and concentrated within this first capture step before moving to polishing steps.

In June 2018, we entered into an agreement with Navigo Proteins GmbH (“Navigo”) for the exclusiveco-development of multiple affinity ligands for which Repligen holds commercialization rights. We are manufacturing and have agreed to supply the first of these ligands,NGL-Impact™ A, exclusively to Purolite, who will pair our high-performance ligand with Purolite’s agarose jetting base bead technology used in their Jetted A50 Protein A resin product. We also signed a long-term supply agreement with Purolite forNGL-Impact A and potential additional affinity ligands that may advance from our Navigo collaboration. The Navigo and Purolite agreements are supportive of our strategy to secure and reinforce our Proteins product line.

Growth Factors

Most biopharmaceuticals are produced through an upstream mammalian cell fermentation process. In order to stimulate increased cell growth and maximize overall yield from a bioreactor, manufacturers often add growth factors, such as insulin, to their cell culture fermentation media. As part of the Novozymes Acquisition in 2011, we gained several cell culture growth factor additives. Among those products is LONG®R3 IGF-1, our insulin-like growth factor that has been shown to be up to 100 times more biologically potent than insulin (the industry standard), thereby increasing recombinant protein production in cell culture fermentation applications. LONGR3IGF-1 is sold through a distribution partnership with MilliporeSigma.

Corporate Information

We are a Delaware corporation with global headquarters in Waltham, Massachusetts. We were incorporated in 1981 and became a publicly traded company in 1986. Our common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Global Market

under the symbol “RGEN”. We have over 540 employees and operate globally with offices and manufacturing sites located at multiple locations in the United States, Europe and Asia. Our principal executive offices are located at 41 Seyon Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02453, our website iswww.repligen.com and our telephone number is(781) 250-0111.

Our Market Opportunity

The global biologics drug market was estimated to be over $200 billion in 2017. This market includes therapeutic antibodies, recombinant proteins and vaccines. Antibody-based biologics alone accounted for over $115 billion of global biopharma revenue and represented a majority of the top 10 best-selling drugs across the pharmaceutical industry in 2017. Industry sources project the biologics market to grow at a rate of8%-10% annually over the next five years, driven by strength in the mAb class of biologics, as evidenced by the rate of new approvals, expanded labels for marketed antibodies and the emergence of biosimilar versions of originator mAbs.

In 2018, 13 mAbs (a record 11 originator mAbs and two biosimilars) were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) to treat a diverse range of diseases. Between 2016 and 2018, 36 mAbs were approved by the FDA, representing over 40% of all approved mAbs since the first therapeutic antibody was brought to market in 1986. There are currently more than 80 mAbs on the market and more than 400 in various stages of clinical development addressing a wide range of medical conditions including asthma, migraines and Alzheimer’s disease.

In addition to investments in the discovery and development of novel biologic drugs, there has been substantial investment infollow-on products (biosimilars) by generic and specialty pharmaceutical as well as large biopharmaceutical companies. Development offollow-on products has accelerated as the first major mAbs have come off patent in the European Union and United States. Due to the high cost of biologic drugs, many countries in the developing and emerging markets have been aggressively investing in biomanufacturing capabilities to supply lower cost biosimilars for the local markets. For both originator andfollow-on biologics manufacturing, Repligen products are well-positioned to enable greater manufacturing flexibility, production yields and lower costs through strategic partnersimproved process efficiencies.

Many of the products we manufacture are in select markets. In 2014the early stages of their adoption cycle, and 2015, we invested in expandingtogether with the expansion of our global commercial organization addingand strategic acquisitions, have contributed to product revenue growth from $47.5 million in 2013, to $193.9 million in 2018. While all product lines have grown over this period, our diversification strategy has resulted in a significant increase in direct product sales marketingas a percent of total product revenue, from 17% in 2012. By 2018, 72% of total bioprocessing revenue was attributable to direct product sales; 47% from our Filtration product line, 23% from our Chromatography product line and applications personnel who interact directly witha small percentage from other sources including sales of hospital products that we obtained through our end users. Our customer base comprisesacquisition of leading life sciences companies, major contract manufacturers and 20 of the top 25 biopharmaceutical companies.Spectrum.

Customers use our products to produce initial quantities of drug for clinical studies, and thenscale-up to larger volumes as the drug progresses to commercial production following regulatory approval. Detailed specifications for a drug’s manufacturing process are included in applications that must be approved by regulators, such as the U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationFDA, and the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), throughout the clinical trial process and prior to final commercial approval. As a result, products that become part of the manufacturing specifications of a late-stage clinical or commercial process can be very “sticky” due tosensitive given the regulatory hurdles, costs and uncertainties associated with displacing them.

Many of our products are early in their adoption cycle, and together with the expansion of our commercial organization and strategic acquisitions, have contributed to product revenue expansion from $41.8 million in 2012 to $83.5 million in 2015. To meet increased demand for our products, we have increased the volume and scale of manufacturing at our two manufacturing facilities in the U.S. and Sweden.

We were incorporated in May 1981 under the laws of the State of Delaware. Our principal executive offices are located at 41 Seyon Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02453 and our telephone number is (781) 250-0111. We conduct manufacturing in Waltham and at our facility in Lund, Sweden.

Our Market Opportunity

The global biologics drug market is estimated to be over $200 billion. This market includes mAbs, proteins and vaccines. mAb-based biologics alone accounted for approximately $80 billion of revenue, and represented six of the top 10 best-selling drugs across the pharmaceutical industry, in 2014. Industry sources project the biologics market to grow at approximately 8-10% annually over the next five years, driven by strength in the mAb class of biologics. This strength is evidenced by the rate of new approvals, expanded labels for marketed mAbs and the emergence of biosimilar versions of originator mAbs. In 2015, a record of nine therapeutic mAbs were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat a diverse range of diseases, including the first-ever approvals of mAbs to control LDL or “bad cholesterol.” There are currently more than 300 mAbs in various stages of clinical development, addressing a wide range of medical conditions including asthma, migraines and Alzheimer’s disease.

In addition to investments in the discovery and development of novel biologic drugs, there has been substantial investment in follow-on products (biosimilars and biobetters) by generic and specialty pharmaceutical as well as large biopharmaceutical companies. We believe development of follow-on products is accelerating as the first major mAbs begin to come off patent in the EU and U.S. For example, there are at least 12 companies attempting to market the first Humira® (adalimumab) biosimilar, which faces patent expiration in the U.S. at the end of 2016. Also, due to the high cost of biologic drugs, many countries in the developing and emerging markets have been aggressively investing in biomanufacturing capabilities to supply lower cost alternatives or biosimilars for the local markets We believe they are focused on innovative technologies that offer greater manufacturing flexibility, production yields and lower-costs through improved process efficiencies.

The Biologics Manufacturing Process

Manufacturing biologic drugs requires three fundamental steps. First, upstream manufacturing involves the production of the biologic by living cells that are grown in a bioreactor under controlled conditions. Methods of production vary with the industry standard beingfed-batch, where nutrients (media) are added to a bioreactor to

stimulate cell growth and productivity and then followed by a harvest step. The industry is increasingly adopting the perfusion (or continuous) method of production, which circulates nutrients into the bioreactor, while simultaneously harvesting the biologic drug product. Some manufacturers are embracing a hybrid approach combining bothfed-batch and perfusion methods. The cells being grown in a bioreactor are engineered to produce the biologic drugs of interest. These cells, or factories,tiny cell “factories” are highly sensitive to the conditions under which they grow, including the composition of the cell culture media and the growth factors used to stimulate increased cell growth and protein production, or titre. In the second downstream step, the biologic made upstream must be separated and purified, typically through various filtration and chromatography steps. In the third stage of the process,Finally, the purified biologic drug is concentrated and formulated and then quality controlled and packaged into its final injectable form.

Biologics are generally high value therapies. Given the inherent complexities of the process and the final drug product, we have observed that manufacturers are seeking and investing in innovative technologies that address pressure points in the production process in order to improve yields. We see that manufacturersManufacturers are also seeking technologies that reduce cost of goodscosts as the biologic drug moves through clinical stages and into commercial processes by adoptingsingle-use technologies as well as other products that confer moreyield increased flexibility and efficiency.

Our Products

Downstream Products

Protein AStrategy

We are focused on the leading providerdevelopment, production and commercialization of Protein A ligands, an essential component of Protein A chromatography resins (media) useddifferentiated, technology-leading solutions or products that address specific pressure points in the purification of virtually all monoclonal antibody-based drugs on the market (more than 50) or in development (more than 300). We manufacture multiple forms of Protein A ligands under long term supply agreements for major life sciences companies including GE Healthcarebiologics manufacturing process and MilliporeSigma, who in turn sell their Protein A chromatography media to end users (biopharmaceutical manufacturers). We have two manufacturing sites, one in Lund, Sweden and another in Waltham, MA, collectively supporting overall global demand for our Protein A ligands. On February 23, 2016, we amended our long term supply agreements with GE Healthcare to, among other things, extend the terms of the supply agreement relatingdeliver substantial value to our Lund, Sweden facility through 2019. The supply agreement relating to our Waltham, MA facility runs through 2021. This dual manufacturing capability gives us strong business continuity and reduces overall supply risk for our major customers.

Protein A chromatography media is considered the industry standard for purification of mAbs, due to the ability of Protein A to selectively bind to or “capture” mAbs from crude protein mixtures. Protein A media is packed into chromatography columns as the standard first step in a purification process. As a result of Protein A’s high affinity for antibodies, the mAb product is highly purified and concentrated within this first capture step before moving to polishing steps. The global Protein A media market that we supply generates annual revenues of $350-$400 million. We expect continued growth for our Protein A ligands as new drugs are approved and biosimilar manufacturing accelerates.

Chromatography products

Our chromatography portfolio includes a number of products used in the downstream purification and quality control of biological drugs. The main driver of growth in this portfolio is our OPUS® pre-packed chromatography column line. Our other products include Protein A chromatography resins used in a small number of commercial drug processes and ELISA test kits used by quality control departments to detect and measure the presence of leached Protein A in the final product.

Chromatography columns, packed with chromatography media, are used in biomanufacturing to purify the contents of a bioreactor. For late-stage clinical and large commercial processes, stainless steel columns are standard, and are packed in-house by the biomanufacturer. For clinical stage manufacturing, biomanufacturers value the quick turnover, cost savings and convenience of using pre-packed columns such as OPUS® versus traditional glass columns.

OPUS columns are pre-packed with purification media and are an efficient plug-and-play solution for our customers, and is a growing area of our business. As biomanufacturers have become acutely focused on improving the drug development process, they are moving towards flexible manufacturing and disposable solutions such as OPUS. Over the past three years we have observed customers moving away from in-house solutions (self-packed glass columns). They are starting to adopt the OPUS ready-to-use format due to convenience, flexibility and consistent product performance. OPUS columns save labor time, reduce overall costs and improve overall manufacturing efficiency, allowing biomanufacturers to reassign resources to higher value-add processes.

Our OPUS line is distinctly open platform, providing desirable opportunities for customization. For example, most biopharmaceutical manufacturers utilize three different chromatography media in a given process and our flexible columns are designed to meet these needs. We differentiate ourselves in the pre-packed column space by packing any brand of chromatography media in OPUS to any bed height, ensuring the most convenientincrease our customers’ product yield, and efficient process for end users. The plug-and-play nature of our OPUS columns make them ideal for purification of antibodies and recombinant proteins. With the launch of OPUS 45 cm diameter columns in 2014 and 60 cm columns in 2015, we have further differentiated ourselves from our competitors who offer a limited number of column diameter and resin (media) options. By offering these larger columns, we are making inroads in the glass column market whichcommitted to supporting our customers typically self-pack.

Pre-packed chromatography columns are at the early stages of adoption; we estimate that currently, we and our competitors collectively capture approximately 30% of a $165 million addressable market. As our sales force expands and we increase the number of call points, we are seeing more multi-site adoption of our OPUS® prepacked columns, including increased use by contract manufacturers, where quick turnover of multiple production runs is critical to profitability. We expect continuedwith strong growth for this product line as we aim to expand geographically and provide best-in-classcustomer service and support.

Upstream Products

Growth factors

Most biopharmaceuticals are produced through a mammalian cell fermentation process. In order to stimulate increased cell growth and maximize overall yield from a bioreactor, manufacturers often add growth factors, such as insulin, to the cell culture fermentation media. As part of the Novozymes Acquisition, we acquired several cell culture growth factor additives. Among those products is LONG®R3 IGF-1, our insulin-like growth factor that has been shown to be 100 times more biologically potent than insulin (the industry standard), thereby increasing recombinant protein production in cell culture fermentation applications. LONG®R3 IGF-1 is currently used in the manufacture of several commercial biopharmaceutical products and is sold through a distribution partnership with MilliporeSigma. Our goal over the last few years with MilliporeSigma has been to focus on pipeline development and work with customers already familiar with the product to more broadly adopt LONG®R3 IGF-1 as a platform product.

We estimate that the current market for cell culture growth factors is $75-$80 million. We are gaining share of this market as customers displace insulin with LONG®R3 IGF-1. We anticipate continued growth for this product group as our pipeline of opportunities advances from early-stage clinical to late-stage clinical and commercial manufacturing processes.

ATF Systems

The ATF System is a technologically advanced filtration device used to continuously remove cellular metabolic waste products during the course of a fermentation run, freeing healthy cells to continue producing the biologic drug of interest. The ATF System is designed to both increase the density of cells in a bioreactor and extend the production run, resulting in significantly greater product yield of up to two- to three-fold as well as reduced costs. This is important to biomanufacturers who seek to maximize output from their existing facilities. ATF Systems consist of a stainless steel housing that contains a consumable filter and an associated pump and controller. We sell the ATF System in a variety of sizes suitable for use in laboratory and scale-up all the way to production bioreactors as large as 2,000 liters. ATF Systems are used in the production of several FDA-approved monoclonal antibodies.

Following our acquisition of the ATF System from Refine Technology in 2014, we integrated the production of ATF into our operations in Waltham, MA.applications expertise.

We estimate thatintend to build on our recent history of developing market-leading solutions and delivering strong financial performance through the current market for cell retention devices is approximately $125-150 million. Within this market, we expect continued growth for our ATF franchise over the next several years, as biologics manufacturing accelerates globally and as large pharmaceutical customers who have evaluated the system adopt the technology as platform. The ATF System strengthens our upstream fermentation business and significantly broadens our technology base.following strategies:

Continued innovation. We plan to capitalize on our internal technological expertise to develop products that address unmet needs in upstream and downstream bioprocessing. We intend to invest further in our core Proteins product lines while developing platform and derivative products to support our Filtration and Chromatography product lines.

Platforming our products.A key strategy for accelerating market adoption of our products is delivery of enabling technologies that become the standard, or “platform,” technology in markets where we compete. We focus our efforts on winning early-stage technology evaluations through direct interaction with the key biomanufacturing decision makers in process development labs. This strategy is designed to establish early adoption of our enabling technologies at key accounts, with opportunity for customers to scale up as the molecule advances to later stages of development and potential commercialization. We believe this approach can accelerate the implementation of our products as platform products, thereby strengthening our competitive advantage and contributing to long-term growth.

Targeted acquisitions. We intend to continue to selectively pursue acquisitions of innovative technologies and products. We intend to leverage our balance sheet to acquire technologies and products that improve our overall financial performance by improving our competitiveness in filtration or chromatography or moving us into adjacent markets with common commercial call points.

Geographical expansion. We intend to expand our global commercial presence by continuing to selectively build out our global sales, marketing, field applications and services infrastructure.

Operational efficiency. We seek to expand operating margins through capacity utilization and process optimization strategies designed to increase our manufacturing yields. We plan to invest in systems to support our global operations, optimizing resources across our global footprint to maximize productivity.

Research and Development

Our research activities are focused on developing new high-value bioprocessing products. Specifically, we plan to focus these efforts on expanding our product portfolio and applications for our OPUS PPC columns, XCell ATF OPUSsystems, SIUS TFF, KrosFlo®, TFF systems and chromatography portfolio, includingother products, and developing next generation Protein A ligands. Research and development expenses totaled approximately $5.7 million, $5.6 million and $7.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Licensing Agreements

HDAC Agreement with BioMarin

On January 21, 2014, we out-licensed our HDACi portfolio, which includes the Friedreich’s ataxia program, to BioMarin Pharmaceuticals Inc. Friedreich’s ataxia is an inherited disease that causes progressive damage to the nervous system resulting in symptoms ranging from impaired walking and speech problems to heart disease. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, BioMarin agrees to use commercially reasonable efforts to commercialize HDACi portfolio product until the later of (i) the expiration of the last-to-expire valid claim of an issued and unexpired patent or pending patent application claiming a compound included in the agreement or (ii) 10 years. Under the terms of the agreement, Repligen received an upfront payment of $2 million in January 2014 from BioMarin and we have the potential to receive up to $160 million in future milestone payments for BioMarin’s development, regulatory approval and commercial sale of portfolio compounds included in the agreement. These potential milestone payments are approximately 37% related to clinical development and 63% related to initial commercial sales in specific geographies. In addition, Repligen is eligible to receive royalties on sales of qualified products developed. The royalty rates are tiered and begin in the mid-single-digits for the first HDACi portfolio product and for the first non-HDACi portfolio product with lesser amounts for any backup products developed under the agreement. Repligen’s receipt of these royalties is subject to customary offsets and deductions. There are no refund provisions in this agreement. Royalties under this agreement are paid on a country-by-country basis during the period beginning on the first commercial sale of a compound in such country, until the later of: (i) the expiration of exclusivity period granted by a governmental authority to prevent the entry of generic product into such country; (ii) the expiration of the last-to-expire valid claim of an issued and unexpired patent or pending patent application claiming such compound in such country; or (iii) ten years following the first commercial sale of such HDACi portfolio product in any country. Royalty payments on products derived from the compounds included in the agreement are calculated by multiplying net sales of such product for the calendar year by an applicable royalty rate based on incremental net sale amounts. We have no further obligations to BioMarin.

SMA Agreement with Pfizer

On December 28, 2012, we entered into an exclusive worldwide licensing agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Pfizer to advance the SMA program, which is led by RG3039 and also includes backup compounds and enabling technologies. Under the terms of the License Agreement, we received $5 million from Pfizer as an upfront payment on January 22, 2013, a $1 million milestone payment on September 4, 2013 and a $1 million milestone payment on December 28, 2014. On January 26, 2015, Pfizer notified us that they were terminating the License Agreement for convenience, effective as of April 26, 2015. We do not intend to invest additional resources to the development of the SMA program.

RG1068

Our clinical development portfolio previously included RG1068, a synthetic human hormone we had developed as a novel imaging agent for the improved detection of pancreatic duct abnormalities in combination with magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pancreatitis and potentially other pancreatic diseases. On December 23, 2014, Innovate Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Innovate”) acquired our RG1068 program for a nominal amount. Innovate is solely responsible for future development and commercialization of RG1068. If Innovate gains marketing approval and successfully commercializes RG1068, Repligen is eligible to receive royalties through the latter of ten years after the first commercial sale or the entry of a generic equivalent into the U.S. market.

Sales and Marketing

Our sales and marketing strategy supports our objective of establishing Repligenstrengthening our position as a leading provider of products and services, addressing upstream, downstream and quality control needs of bioprocessing customers in

the biopharmaceutical industry.

Direct-to-Customer Team

To support our sales goals for ourdirect-to-consumer products, we have invested in our commercial organization. Since 2014, we have significantly expanded our global commercial organization, to form a103-person commercial team as of December 31, 2018. This includes 54 people in field positions (direct sales, field applications and field service), and 49 people with internal positions (marketing, product management and customer service). This expansion also includes the biotechnologyteam of 26 highly experienced field personnel that we added with our acquisition of Spectrum in 2017. With the acquisition, we have greatly expanded our direct sales team in Asia, where we also work effectively with key distributors to serve our expanding customer base.

As part of the Spectrum integration process, we transitioned to a new sales model in 2018, whereby all sales staff now represent all Repligen products across our Chromatography and biopharmaceutical industries. ThroughFiltration portfolios. Our bioprocess account managers are supported in each region by bioprocess sales specialists with expertise in either Filtration or Chromatography and by technically trained field applications specialists and field service providers, who can work closely with customers on product demonstrations, implementation and support. We believe that this model helps drive further adoption at our productskey accounts and brands, including Protein A, LONG®R3 IGF-1, OPUS®, ATFalso open up new sales opportunities within each region.

OEM Agreements

For our Proteins product line, we provide premiere offerings and services to our bioprocess customers. We are committed to being a partner of choice for our customers with distributor and supply agreements in place for our growth factor and Protein A products with large life sciences companies such as GE Healthcare, MilliporeSigma and MilliporeSigma. On February 23, 2016, we amended our long term supply agreements withPurolite. The GE Healthcare to, among other things, extend the terms of theProtein A supply agreement relating to our Lund, Sweden facility runs, pursuant to its terms, through 2019.2019 with an option for earlier termination on six months’ advance notice. The GE Healthcare Protein A supply agreement relating to our Waltham, MAMassachusetts facility runs, pursuant to its terms, through 2021. We have investedOur Protein A supply agreement with MilliporeSigma runs, pursuant to its terms, through 2023, and in 2018 we amended our commercial organizationProtein A supply agreement with Purolite that runs, pursuant to its terms, to August 2026 with an option for renewal through 2028. Our dual manufacturing capability provides strong business continuity and now have 23 sales, marketing, product management and service individuals providing service and support toreduces overall supply risk for our expanding customer base. Our global sales organization has both distributor and direct sales personnel, depending on the market and application area. We will continue to expand our commercial organization. This organization also helps us identify market needs and new technologies that we can license and develop into new products.OEM customers.

Segment and Geographic Areas

We have one reportable segment. Segment and geographical information is contained in Note 2 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

Significant Customers and Geographic Reporting

Customers for our bioprocessing products include major life science companies, contract manufacturing organizations, biopharmaceutical companies, diagnostics companies and laboratory researchers.

The following table represents the Company’s total revenue by geographic area (based on the location of the customer):

 

   Years ended December 31, 
   2015  2014  2013 

Sweden

   37  38  35

United States

   28  33  51

United Kingdom

   17  20  12

Other

   18  9  2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   100  100  100
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Royalty revenue from Bristol represented 27% of total revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013; no such revenues were generated in 2014 and 2015.

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2018  2017  2016 

Revenue by customers’ geographic locations:

    

North America

   48  43  39

Europe

   40  46  54

APAC

   12  11  7

Other

   0  0  0
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenue

   100  100  100
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

GE Healthcare, our largest bioprocessing customer, accounted for 37%15%, 38%21% and 35%29% of total revenues in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively. MilliporeSigma, our second largest bioprocessing customer, accounted for 29%15%, 33%18% and 25%28% of total revenues in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

Employees

As of February 18, 2016,December 31, 2018, we had 168 employees.548employees. Of those employees, 1254 were engaged in engineering and research and development, 102325 in manufacturing, 23103 in sales and marketing and 3166 in administrative functions. Each of our employees has signed a confidentiality agreement. None of our U.S. employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We have twoone collective bargaining agreementsagreement with two unions that covercovers our 6162 employees in Sweden, comprising approximately 36%11% of our total workforce. The currentWe renewed these collective bargaining agreements during 2017, and the new collective bargaining agreements expire on March 31, 2016.2020. We are currently in negotiations to renew these collective bargaining agreements, and the risk of any work stoppage is low. The Company considers itsconsider our employee relations to be satisfactory.

Patents, LicensesIntellectual Property

We are committed to protecting our intellectual property through a combination of patent, copyright, trade secret and Proprietary Rights

Repligen considers patents to be an important element in the protection of our competitive and proprietary position and actively, and selectively, pursues patent protection in the United States and in major countries

abroad.trademark laws, as well as confidentiality agreements. As further described below, Repligen ownswe own or hashave exclusive rights to a number of U.S. patents and U.S. pending patent applications as well as corresponding foreign patents and patent applications. The

Chromatography

For our Chromatography product line, we have a base of intellectual property that comes from our acquisitions of Atoll GmbH in 2016, and certain assets acquired from BioFlash Partners in 2010. Our issued patents cover certain unique methods and features of our OPUSpre-packed columns, including methods of making and loading these chromatography columns as well as the column structure. We continually seek to improve upon this technology and have multiple new patent filings including those covering gamma irradiation sterilization, packing methods, and methods of removing air using specialized tubing and valve systems.

Filtration

For our Filtration product line, we are leveraging our acquisitions of third-party filtration patented technology of Refine, with a focus on ATF technology, TangenX, with a focus on tangential flow flat sheet cassette technology, and Spectrum, with a focus on tangential flow hollow fiber technology. We continually seek to improve upon these technologies and have multiple new patent filings including those covering pumps and controllers, methods of harvesting,single-use products, and filters. Our patent for alternating tangential flow and associated methods to use such a device in perfusion, acquired from Refine, expires in 2020, and we are proactively developing technology in an effort to mitigate any effects resulting from the expiration of keythis patent.

We currently have 44 patents owned or licensed by us orgranted (which expire over the failure ofnext 20 years) and 85 patents to issue on pending patent applications could create increased competition, with potential adverse effects on our business prospects.in countries including Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, Korea, Sweden, United Kingdom and the United States.

Other forms of market protection, including trade secrets and know-how, are also considered important elements of our proprietary strategy. Our policy is to require each of our employees, consultants, business partners, potential collaborators and major customers to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of an employment, consulting, business relationship, or product related audit with us. These agreements provide that all confidential information developed or made known to the other party during the course of the relationship with us is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances. In the case of employees and consultants, the agreements generally provide that all inventions conceived by the individual in the course of rendering services to Repligen shall be our exclusive property.property and must be assigned to Repligen.

Protein A

We have developed proprietary technology, trade secrets, and know-how relating to the manufacture of recombinant Protein A atcurrently hold a scale and quality standard which is consistent with the requirements of the biopharmaceutical industry. In addition, in April 2010, we were granted U.S. Patent No. 7,691,608,patent for “Nucleic Acids Encoding Recombinant Protein A,” which claims a recombinant genean isolated nucleic acid molecule that encodes a Protein A molecule with an amino acid sequence identical to that of the natural Protein A, molecule, which has long been commercialized for bioprocessing applications. This U.S. patent with the term adjustment that was granted, will remain in effect until June 2028. Foreign equivalents of this patentWe also have been issuedtwo pending patents covering affinity ligands through our collaboration with Navigo GmbH.

Trademarks

We vigilantly protect our products and services’ branding by maintaining trademark registrations globally for the Repligen trademark and our key product brands. We have a comprehensive branding policy that includes trademark usage guidelines to ensure Repligen trademarks are used in Sweden, Netherlands, Great Britain, France, Germanya manner that provides the maximum protection.

We prioritize our “housemark” trademarks, (i.e., Repligen, Spectrum and Canada. The claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,691,608 cover compositions of matter including isolated nucleic acids, expression vectors, bacterial cells that include the nucleic acids,TangenX), and ensure they are sufficiently protected and registered in key countries or regions globally, such as well as methods of producing truncated Protein A polypeptides, methods of producing affinity chromatography resins, and methods of purifying proteins.

OPUS

In January 2012, Repligen filed a provisional patent application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) which covers certain unique features of our OPUS pre-packed columns. Pending claims that relate to these unique features cover the ease and flexibility of column packing, bed height adjustment and cleaning that is improved over existing pre-packed column designs. In January 2013, we filed an international patent cooperation treaty (“PCT”) application as well as a utility application with the USPTO on the basis of the provisional application. The OPUS pre-packed column patent application is pending in the United States, Australia, Canada, Europe Hong Kong, India, and Japan.China. We also have product trademarks, including OPUS, XCell ATF, KrosFlo, SIUS,Pro-Connex, Spectra/Por andNGL-Impact A, that provide valuable company recognition and goodwill with its customers.

ATF Systems

As part of the Refine Acquisition, Repligen acquired the exclusive rightsOur ability to an issued U.S. patent (US 6,544,424) covering the Alternating Tangential Flow (ATF) System and a process related to the filtration of biologic fluids from a bioreactor through hollow fiber filters by the action of a diaphragm pump which creates alternating tangential flow through the filter. The patent expires in 2020. Another patent has been issuedcompete effectively in the U.S. covering improvementsmarketplace is dependent in part on the original ATF design that include a screen filter module (US 9,050,547). This family of patents and applications has issued or is pending in Brazil, Canada, China, Europe, India, and Korea. Other additional improvements on the original ATF systems and methods are covered by patent applications pending in one or more of the US, Canada, China, Europe, India, Japan, and Korea.

Spinal Muscular Atrophy

In 2009, Repligen entered into an exclusive license agreement with a non-profit organization, FSMA, now called CureSMA, for worldwide rightsour ability to patent applications related to compositions and methods for the

treatment of spinal muscular atrophy. FSMA had funded the development of these compounds and identified a novel enzyme target (“DcpS”) that these compounds inhibit. In 2011, we were granted U.S. Patent Nos. 7,888,366 and 7,985,755, both entitled “2,4 Diaminoquinazolines for Spinal Muscular Atrophy,” with allowed composition claims that cover both the genus and the species of the chemical structures of the lead clinical candidates. The expiration date of U.S. Patent No. 7,888,366 (the ‘366 patent) is in 2028 with potential for patent term extension. The expiration date of U.S. Patent No. 7,985,755 (the ‘755 patent) is in 2027 with potential for patent term extension. U.S. Patent No. 9,067,897, which is a continuation of the ‘366 patent, was issued in 2015 and expires in 2027. Foreign equivalents of these U.S. patents have been issued and/or are pending in Australia, Canada, Europe, Hong Kong, Japan, and New Zealand.

Pursuant to the License Agreement, we licensed all ofprotect our intellectual property relatedrights, which includes protecting the trademarks we use in connection with our products and services. We rely on several registered and unregistered trademarks to SMA to Pfizer and Pfizer has assumed responsibility for maintaining existing intellectual property and prosecuting new intellectual property relating to this program. On January 26, 2015, Pfizer issued to us a notice of its termination of the License Agreement for convenience, effective as of April 26, 2015.protect our brand.

Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsLicensing Agreements

Repligen hasWe have entered into multiple licensing and collaboration relationships with third-party business partners in an exclusive license agreement with The Scripps Research Institute for worldwide rightseffort to a patent application claiming compoundsfully exploit our technology and methods for treating Friedreich’s ataxia with inhibitors of histone deacetylase. We have extended this original work and filed additional patent applications which claim both methods and compositions for treating Friedreich’s ataxia. We licensed all ofadvance our intellectual property related to HDAC to BioMarin and BioMarin has assumed responsibility for maintaining existing intellectual property and prosecuting new intellectual property relating to this program. On January 21, 2014, we out-licensed our HDAC Inhibitor (HDACi) portfolio to BioMarin Pharmaceuticals Inc. Our out-licensed HDACi portfolio included patent applications in the United States as well as patent applications in Europe, Canada, Japan and Australia. Patents, if any, that are granted in the U.S. based on these patent applications are expected to expire from 2029 to 2032.bioprocessing business strategy.

Competition

Our bioprocessing products compete on the basis of quality, performance, cost effectiveness, and application suitability with numerous established technologies. Additional products using new technologies that may be competitive with our products may also be introduced. Many of the companies selling or developing competitive products, which in some cases include GE Healthcare and MilliporeSigma, our two largest customers, have greater financial and human resources, research and development, manufacturing and marketing experience than we do. They may undertake their own development of products that are substantially similar to or compete with

our products and they may succeed in developing products that are more effective or less costly than any that we may develop. These competitors may also prove to be more successful in their production, marketing and commercialization activities. We cannot be certain that the research, development and commercialization efforts of our competitors will not render any of our existing or potential products obsolete.

Manufacturing

We manufacture seven commercial forms of Protein A, including “native” Protein A for life sciences companies, including GE Healthcare, MilliporeSigma and MilliporeSigmaPurolite, under long-term supply agreements which expire between 2019 and 2021.2023. Native Protein A is manufactured in Lund, Sweden, while the recombinant forms are manufactured in Waltham, Massachusetts or in both Waltham, Massachusetts and Lund, Sweden. We currently manufacture our growth factor products in Sweden and ourLund, Sweden. Our OPUS chromatography columns and XCell ATF System products are manufactured in Waltham, Massachusetts.

We generally purchase raw materials from more than one commercially established company Our OPUSPD columns are manufactured in Ravensburg, Germany, and believe thatour SIUS TFF products were manufactured in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts until December 31, 2018 before manufacturing of the necessary raw materialsSIUS TFF products shifted to our new facility in Marlborough, Massachusetts. Our KrosFlo, Spectra/Pro andPro-Connex lines of products are currently commercially availablemanufactured in sufficient quantities necessary to meet market demand. However, thereRancho Dominguez, California. Our operating room products are only a limited number of suppliers of materials related to the ATF Systemmanufactured in Irving, Texas, and our Spectra/Chrom products one of which is the primary supplier of materials used for consumable ATF System products.are manufactured in Houston, Texas.

We utilize our own facilities in Waltham, Massachusetts and Lund, Sweden as well as third partythird-party contract manufacturing organizations to carry out certain fermentation and recovery operations, while the purification, immobilization, packaging and quality control testing of our bioprocessing products are conducted at our facilities. Our U.S. facility,facilities located in Waltham, MassachusettsMassachusetts; Lund, Sweden; Ravensburg, Germany; and our Sweden facility, located in Lund,Rancho Dominguez, California are both ISO 90019001:2015 certified and maintain formal quality systems to maintain process control, traceability, and product conformance. Additionally, our facility in Irving, Texas is ISO 13485:2012 certified. We practice continuous improvement initiatives based on routine internal audits as well as external feedback and audits performed by our partners and customers. In addition, we maintain a business continuity management system which focuses on key areas such as contingency planning, security stocks andoff-site storage of raw materials and finished goods to ensure continuous supply of our products.

Available Information

We maintain a website with the address www.repligen.com.www.repligen.com. We are not including the information contained on our website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form10-K. We make available free of charge through our website our Annual Reports on Form10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q and Current Reports on Form8-K, and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such materials with, or furnish such materials to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is also available free of charge through our website.

In addition, the public may read and copy any materials that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Also, ourOur filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission may be accessed through the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval (EDGAR) system at www.sec.gov.

www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

Investors should carefully consider the risk factors described below before making an investment decision.

If any of the events described in the following risk factors occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially harmed. In that case the trading price of our common stock could decline, and investors may lose all or part of their investment. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of or that we currently deem immaterial may also become important factors that affect Repligen.

This Annual Report on Form10-K contains forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward lookingforward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks faced by us described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report onForm10-K.

We face competition from numerous competitors, most of whom have far greater resources than we have, which may make it more difficult for us to achieve significant market penetration.

The bioprocessing market is intensely competitive, subject to rapid change and significantly affected by new product introductions and other market activities of industry participants.

Many of our competitors are large, well-capitalized companies with significantly more market share and resources than we have. As a consequence, they are able to spend more aggressively on product development, marketing, sales and other product initiatives than we can. Many of these competitors have:

 

significantly greater name recognition;

 

larger and more established distribution networks;

 

additional lines of products and the ability to bundle products to offer higher discounts or other incentives to gain a competitive advantage;

 

greater experience in conducting research and development, manufacturing, clinical trials, marketing, obtaining regulatory approval and entering into collaboration or other strategic partnership arrangements; and

 

greater financial and human resources for product development, sales and marketing and patent litigation.

Our current and future competitors, or other companiesincluding certain of our customers, may at any time develop additional products that compete with our products. If an existing or future competitorany company develops products that compete with or are superior to our products, our revenue may decline. In addition, some of our competitors may compete by lowering the price of their products. If prices were to fall, we may not be able to improve our gross margins or sales growth sufficiently to maintain and grow our profitability.

We dependDespite our increasingly diversified client base, we have historically depended on, and expect to continue to depend on, a limited number of customers for a high percentage of our revenues.

The loss of, or a significant reduction in orders from, any of theseour large customers, including following any termination or failure to renew a long-term supply contract, would significantly reduce our revenues and harm our results of operations. If a large customer purchases fewer of our products, defers orders or fails to place additional orders with us for any other reason, including for business continuity purposes, our revenue could decline, and our operating results may not meet market expectations. Under our long-term supply agreements with GE Healthcare (“GE”), we supply Protein A ligands to GE from our manufacturing facilities in Lund, Sweden and Waltham, Massachusetts (the “Lund Agreement” and “Waltham Agreement,” respectively). The Lund Agreement runs pursuant to its terms, through 2019 and the Waltham Agreement runs, pursuant to its terms, through 2021. GE may elect, upon six months’ prior notice to us, to reduce its minimum purchase requirements under the Lund Agreement. Even if GE so elects, GE would still be required to continue to purchase at least 50% of its global demand pursuant to the Waltham Agreement through the expiration of this agreement pursuant to its terms on December 31, 2021.

In addition, if thoseour customers order our products, but fail to pay on time or at all, our liquidity and operating results could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, if any of our current or future products compete with those of any of our largest customers, these customers may place fewer orders with us or cease placing orders with us, which would negatively affect our revenues and operating results.

AsIf we evolve from a company dependent on othersare unable to commercialize our products to a company selling directly to end users, we may encounter difficulties in expandingexpand our product portfolio, and our commercial efforts.ability to generate revenue could be adversely affected.

In connection with the Company’s decision to focus our efforts on the growth of our core bioprocessing business, weWe are increasingly seeking to develop and commercialize our own portfolio of products. Our future financial performance will depend, in part, on our ability to successfully develop and acquire additional bioprocessing products. There is no guarantee that we will be able to successfully acquire or develop additional bioprocessing products, and the Company’s financial performance will likely suffer if we are unable to do so.

If intangible assets and goodwill that we recorded in connection with our acquisitions become impaired, we couldmay have to take significant charges against earnings.

In connection with the accounting for the Novozymes Acquisition,our completed acquisitions, we recorded a significant amount of intangible assets, including developed technology and customer relationships relating to the growth factor products. In addition, in connection with the accounting for the Refine Acquisition, we recorded a significant amount of intangible assets, including developed technologyacquired product lines, and customer relationships relating to the ATF system.goodwill. Under U.S. GAAP, we must assess, at least annually and potentially more frequently, whether the value of intangible assets and goodwill has been impaired. Intangible assets and goodwill will be assessed for impairment in the event of an impairment indicator. Any reduction or impairment of the value of intangible assets and goodwill will result in a charge against earnings, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and shareholders’ equity in future periods.

Our exposure to political, economic and other risks that arise from operating a multinational business has and may continue to increase.

We operate on a global basis with offices or activities in Japan, South Korea, China, India, Europe and North America. Our operations and sales outside of the United States have increased as a result of the Novozymes Acquisition and the Refine Acquisitionour strategic acquisitions and the continued expansion of our commercial organization. Risks related to these increased foreign operations include:

 

fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;rates, which may affect the costs incurred in international operations and could harm our results of operations and financial condition;

 

changes in general economic and political conditions in countries where we operate, particularly as a result of ongoing economic instability within the European Union and other foreign jurisdictions;

the occurrence of a trade war, or other governmental action related to tariffs or trade agreements;

 

being subject to complex and restrictive employment and labor laws and regulations, as well as union and works council restrictions;

 

changes in tax laws or rulings in the United States or other foreign jurisdictions that may have an adverse impact on our effective tax rate;

 

being subject to burdensome foreign laws and regulations, including regulations that may place an increased tax burden on our operations;

 

being subject to longer payment cycles from customers and experiencing greater difficulties in timely accounts receivable collections; and

 

required compliance with a variety of foreign laws and regulations.regulations, such as data privacy requirements, real estate and property laws, anti-competition regulations, import and trade restrictions, export requirements, U.S. laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 and the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Export Administration Regulations, and other U.S. federal laws and regulations established by the office of Foreign Asset Control, local laws such as the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010 or other local laws that prohibit corrupt payments to governmental officials or certain payments or remunerations to customers.

Our business success depends in part on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other.other related factors. We cannot assure you that these and other related factors will not materially adversely affect our international operations or business as a whole.

In addition, a deterioration in diplomatic relations between the United States and any country where we conduct business could adversely affect our future operations and lead to a decline in profitability.

We may be unable to efficiently manage efficiently having becomeour growth as a larger and more geographically diverse organization.

The Novozymes Acquisition, the Refine Acquisition,Our strategic acquisitions, the continued expansion of our commercial sales operations, and our organic growth have increased the scope and complexity of our business. WeAs a result, we will face

challenges inherent in efficiently managing a more complex business with an increased number of employees over large geographic distances, including the need to implement appropriate systems, policies, benefits and compliance programs. Our inability to manage successfully the geographically more diverse (including from a cultural perspective) and substantially larger combined organization could materially adversely affect our operating results and, as a result, the market price of our common stock.

Our business is subject to a number of environmental risks.

Our manufacturing business involves the controlled use of hazardous materials and chemicals and is therefore subject to numerous environmental and safety laws and regulations and to periodic inspections for possible violations of these laws and regulations. In addition to these hazardous materials and chemicals, our facility in Sweden also uses Staphylococcus aureus and toxins produced by Staphylococcus aureus in some of its manufacturing processes. Staphylococcus aureus and the toxins it produces, particularly enterotoxins, can cause severe illness in humans. The costs of compliance with environmental and safety laws and regulations are significant and have increased since we completed the acquisition of the Novozymes Biopharma Business.significant. Any violations, even if inadvertent or accidental, of current or future environmental and safety laws or regulations and the cost of compliance with any resulting order or fine could adversely affect our operations.

Our acquisitions expose us to risks that could adversely affect our business, and we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of acquisitions of businesses or technologies.

In addition to the Novozymes Acquisition and the Refine Acquisition, and asAs a part of our growth strategy, we may make selected acquisitions of complementary products and/or businesses. Any acquisition involves numerous risks and operational, financial, and managerial challenges, including the following, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations:

 

difficulties in integrating new operations, technologies, products, and personnel;

 

problems maintaining uniform procedures, controls and policies with respect to our financial accounting systems;

 

lack of synergies or the inability to realize expected synergies and cost-savings;

 

difficulties in managing geographically dispersed operations;operations, including risks associated with entering foreign markets in which we have no or limited prior experience;

 

underperformance of any acquired technology, product, or business relative to our expectations and the price we paid;

 

negative near-term impacts on financial results after an acquisition, including acquisition-related earnings charges;

 

the potential loss of key employees, customers, and strategic partners of acquired companies;

 

claims by terminated employees and shareholders of acquired companies or other third parties related to the transaction;

 

the assumption or incurrence of additional debt obligations or expenses, or use of substantial portions of our cash;

the issuance of equity securities to finance or as consideration for any acquisitions wouldthat dilute the ownership of our stockholders;

 

the issuance of equity securities to finance or as consideration for any acquisitions may not be an option of if the price of our common stock is low or volatile which could preclude us from completing any such acquisitions;

 

any collaboration, strategic alliance and licensing arrangement may require us to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us;

diversion of management’s attention and company resources from existing operations of the business;

 

inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, and policies;

 

the impairment of intangible assets as a result of technological advancements, or worse-than-expected performance of acquired companies; and

 

assumption of, or exposure to, historical liabilities of the acquired business, including unknown contingent or similar liabilities that are difficult to identify or accurately quantify.quantify; and

risks associated with acquiring intellectual property, including potential disputes regarding acquired companies’ intellectual property.

In addition, the successful integration of acquired businesses requires significant efforts and expense across all operational areas, including sales and marketing, research and development, manufacturing, finance, legal, and information technologies. There can be no assurance that any of the acquisitions we may make will be successful or will be, or will remain, profitable. Our failure to successfully address the foregoing risks may prevent us from achieving the anticipated benefits from any acquisition in a reasonable time frame, or at all.

Servicing our debt will require a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to make payments on our debt.

We incurred significant indebtedness in the amount of $115.0 million in aggregate principal with additional accrued interest under our 2.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2021 (the “Notes”). Our ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on, or to refinance our indebtedness, including the Notes, depends on our future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors that may be beyond our control. Our business may not generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring debt or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. In addition, in the event of a fundamental change or a default under the Notes, the holders and/or the trustee under the indentures governing the Notes may accelerate the payment obligations or trigger the holders’ repurchase rights under the Notes. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt obligations, including the Notes.

If a make-whole fundamental change, such as an acquisition of our company, occurs prior to the maturity of the Notes, under certain circumstances, the conversion rate for the Notes will increase such that additional shares of our common stock will be issued upon conversion of the Notes in connection with such make-whole fundamental change. The ATF Systemincrease in the conversion rate will be determined based on the date on which the make-whole fundamental change occurs or becomes effective and the price paid (or deemed paid) per share of our common stock in such transaction. Upon conversion of the Notes, unless we elect to deliver solely shares of our common stock to settle such conversion (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we will be required to make cash payments in respect of the Notes being converted. We may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to make repurchases of Notes surrendered therefor or

notes being converted. Our failure to repurchase Notes at a time when the repurchase is required by the indenture or to pay any cash payable on future conversions of the Notes as required by the indenture would constitute a default under the indenture. If the repayment of the related indebtedness were to be accelerated after any applicable notice or grace periods, we may not have sufficient funds to repay the indebtedness and repurchase the notes or make cash payments upon conversions thereof.

In addition, our significant indebtedness, combined with our other financial obligations and contractual commitments, could have other important consequences. For example, it could:

make us more vulnerable to adverse changes in general U.S. and worldwide economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation;

limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business reliesand our industry;

place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors who have less debt; and

limit our ability to borrow additional amounts for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including to fund possible acquisitions of, or investments in, complementary businesses, products, services and technologies.

Any of these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we incur additional indebtedness, the risks related to our business and our ability to service or repay our indebtedness would increase.

Future strategic transactions or acquisitions may require us to seek additional financing, which we may not be able to secure on favorable terms, if at all.

We plan to continue a strategy of growth and development for our bioprocessing business, and we actively evaluate various strategic transactions on an ongoing basis, including licensing or acquiring complementary products, technologies or businesses that would complement our existing portfolio of development programs. In order to complete such strategic transactions, we may need to seek additional financing to fund these investments and acquisitions. Should we need to do so, we may not be able to secure such financing, or obtain such financing on favorable terms because of the volatile nature of the biotechnology marketplace. In addition, future acquisitions may require the issuance or sale of additional equity or debt securities, which may result in additional dilution to our stockholders.

We rely on a limited number of suppliers or, in some cases,for certain of our products, one supplier, and we may not be able to find replacements or immediately transition to alternative suppliers, which could have a material adverse effect on the ATF System business and our financial condition, results of operations and reputation.

There are only a limited number of suppliers of materials related to the ATF System products, onefor certain of which is the primary supplier of materials used for consumable ATF Systemour products. An interruption in operations of the business related to these products could occur if we encounter delays or difficulties in securing thesethe required materials, or if we cannot then obtain an acceptable substitute. Any such interruption could significantly affect the business related to these products and our financial condition, results of operations and reputation.

WeFor example, we believe that only a small number of suppliers are currently qualified to supply materials for the XCell ATF system.System. The use of materials furnished by these replacement suppliers would require us to alter our operations related to the XCell ATF system.System. Transitioning to a new supplier for our products would be time consuming and expensive, may result in interruptions in our operations, could affect the performance specifications of the ATF systemour product lines or could require that we revalidate the materials. There can be no assurance that we will be able to secure alternative materials and bring such materials on line and revalidate them without experiencing interruptions in our workflow. If we should encounter delays or difficulties in securing, reconfiguring or revalidating the materials required for ATF Systemour products, our business related to these products and our financial condition, results of operations and reputation could be adversely affected.

Our royalty agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb

As we evolve from a company dependent on sales of Orencia expired on December 31, 2013.

Our royalty agreement with Bristol provided for usothers to receive payments from Bristol based on their net sales of their Orencia®commercialize our products to a company selling directly to end users, we may encounter difficulties in expanding our product in the United States through December 31, 2013. As a result, we no longer receive royalty payments under this agreement as of December 31, 2013.

Our license agreement with Pfizer expired on April 26, 2015.

Our licensing agreement with Pfizer provided for us to potentially receive payments from Pfizer based on milestones related to clinical developmentportfolio and initialour commercial sales in specific geographies, as well as royalty payments from Pfizer based on its future sales of RG3039 or any SMA compounds developed under the license agreement. On January 26, 2015, Pfizer issued to us a notice of its termination of the License Agreement for convenience, effective as of April 26, 2015. As a result, we no longer receive milestone payments under this agreement.

We have limited sales and marketing capabilities.

We have a small sales force and, historically,Prior to 2016, we have generated most of our revenues through sales of bioprocessing products to a limited number of life sciences companies, such as GE Healthcare, MilliporeSigma and through other individual distributors. However, due in part to the Refine Acquisition,our recent strategic acquisitions, an increasing amount of our revenue is attributable to our commercialization of bioprocessing products that we sell directly toend-users, such as including biopharmaceutical companies and contract manufacturing organizations. This has required and will continue to require us to invest additional resources in our sales and marketing capabilities. We may not be able to attract and retain additional sales and marketing professionals, and the cost of building the sales and marketing function may not generate our anticipated revenue growth. In addition, our sales and marketing efforts may be unsuccessful. Our failure to manage these risks may have a negative impact on our financial condition, or results of operations and may cause our stock price to decline.

If we are unable to obtain or maintain our intellectual property, we may not be able to succeed commercially.

We endeavor to obtain and maintain trade secrets and, to a lesser extent with respect to the products that currently account for a majority of our revenue, patent and trade secret protection for our products and processes when available in order to protect themour products and processes from unauthorized use and to produce a financial return consistent with the significant time and expense required to bring our products to market. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to:

 

obtain and maintain patent protection for our products and manufacturing processes;

preserve our trade secrets;secrets andknow-how;

 

operate without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties;

obtain and maintain patent protection for our products and manufacturing processes; and

 

secure any necessary licenses from others on acceptable terms.

We consider trade secrets,know-how and other forms of market protection to be among the most important elements of our proprietary position, in particular, as it relates to the products that currently account for a majority of our revenue. We also own or have exclusive rights to a number of U.S. patents and U.S. pending patent applications as well as corresponding foreign patents and patent applications. We continue to actively and selectively pursue patent protection and seek to expand our patent estate, particularly for our products currently in development, and we cannot be sure that any patent applications relating to our products that we will file in the future or that any currently pending applications will issue on a timely basis, if ever. Since patent applications in the United States filed prior to November 2000 are maintained in secrecy until patents issue and since publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature often lag behind actual discoveries, weWe cannot be certain that we were the first to make the inventions covered by each of our pending patent applications or that we were the first to file patent applications for such inventions. Even if patents are issued, the degree of protection afforded by such patents will depend upon the:

 

scope of the patent claims;

 

validity and enforceability of the claims obtained in such patents; and

 

our willingness and financial ability to enforce and/or defend them.

The patent position of life sciences companies is often highly uncertain and usually involves complex legal and scientific questions. Patents which may be granted to us in certain foreign countries may be subject to opposition proceedings brought by third parties or result in suits by us, which may be costly and result in adverse consequences for us.

In some cases, litigation or other proceedings may be necessary to assert claims of infringement, to enforce patents issued to us or our licensors, to protect trade secrets,know-how or other intellectual property rights we own or to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of third parties. Such litigation could result in

substantial cost to us and diversion of our resources. An adverse outcome in any such litigation or proceeding could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If our competitors prepare and file patent applications in the United States that claim technology also claimed by us, we may be required to participate in interference proceedings declared by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to determine priority of invention, which would result in substantial costs to us.

While one of our U.S. patents covering recombinant Protein A had its term adjusted to expire in 2028, our other U.S. patents covering recombinant Protein A have expired, and as a result, we may face increased competition, which could harm our results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and future prospects.

Other companies could begin manufacturing and selling native or some of the commercial forms of recombinant Protein A in the U.S.United States and may directly compete with us on certain Protein A products. This may induce us to sell Protein A at lower prices and may erode our market share, which could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and future prospects.

Our freedom to develop our products may be challenged by others, and we may have to engage in litigation to determine the scope and validity of competitors’ patents and proprietary rights, which, if we do not prevail, could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and future prospects.

There has been substantial litigation and other proceedings regarding the complex patent and other intellectual property rights in the life sciences industry. We have been a party to, and in the future may become a party to, patent litigation or other proceedings regarding intellectual property rights.

Other types of situations in which we may become involved in patent litigation or other intellectual property proceedings include:

 

We may initiate litigation or other proceedings against third parties to seek to invalidate the patents held by such third parties or to obtain a judgment that our products or services do not infringe such third parties’ patents.

 

We may initiate litigation or other proceedings against third parties to seek to enforce our patents against infringement.

 

If our competitors file patent applications that claim technology also claimed by us, we may participate in interference or opposition proceedings to determine the priority of invention.

 

If third partiesthird-parties initiate litigation claiming that our processes or products infringe their patent or other intellectual property rights, we will need to defend against such claims.

The cost to us of any patent litigation or other proceeding, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the cost of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their substantially greater financial resources. If a patent litigation or other intellectual property proceeding is resolved in a way that is unfavorable to us, we or our collaborative or strategic partners may be enjoined from manufacturing or selling our products and services without a license from the other party and be held liable for significant damages. The failure to obtain any required license on commercially acceptable terms or at all may harm our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and future prospects.

Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace. Patent litigation and other proceedings may also absorb significant management time, attention and resources.

We may become involved in litigation or other proceedings with collaborative partners, which may be time consuming, costly and could result in delays in our development and commercialization efforts.

In connection with the Company’s decision to focus its efforts on the growth of its core bioprocessing business, we will seeksought development and commercialization partnerships for our remaining portfolio of clinical stage assets. Any disputes with such partners such as BioMarin, that lead to litigation or similar proceedings may

result in us incurring legal expenses, as well as facing potential legal liability. Such disputes, litigation or other proceedings are also time consuming and may cause delays in our development and commercialization efforts. If we fail to resolve these disputes quickly and with terms that are no less favorable to us than the current terms of the arrangements, our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and future prospects may be harmed.

If we are unable to continue to hire and retain skilled personnel, then we will have trouble developing and marketing our products.

Our success depends largely upon the continued service of our management and scientific staff and our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled technical, scientific, management and marketing personnel. We also face significant competition in the hiring and retention of such personnel from other companies, research and academic institutions, government and other organizations who have superior funding and resources. The loss of key personnel or our inability to hire and retain skilled personnel could materially adversely affect our product development efforts and our business.

The market may not be receptive to our new bioprocessing products upon their introduction.

We expect a portion of our future revenue growth to come from introducing new bioprocessing products, such as a larger size version ofincluding line extensions and new features for our OPUS disposable chromatography products, thecolumns, our XCell ATF System, our SIUS TFF product line, our Spectrum hollow fiber modules and newTFF systems and our growth factors. The commercial success of all of our products will depend upon their acceptance by the life science and biopharmaceutical industries. Many of the bioprocessing products that we are developing are based upon new technologies or approaches. As a result, there can be no assurance that these new products, even if successfully developed and introduced, will be accepted by customers. If customers do not adopt our new products and technologies, our results of operations may suffer and, as a result, the market price of our common stock may decline.

If our newOur products do not achieve sufficient market acceptance, our resultsare subject to quality control requirements.

Whether a product is produced by us or purchased from outside suppliers, it is subjected to quality control procedures, including the verification of operationsporosity and competitive position could suffer.

There can be no assurance that unforeseen problems will not occur with respectcertain products, the complete validation for good manufacturing practices, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, CE and ISO 2001 compliance, prior to final packaging. Quality control is performed by a staff of technicians utilizing calibrated equipment. In the development, performance or market acceptance of new products or thatevent we, will otherwise be able to successfully develop and market new products. Failure of our new products to gain market acceptance or our failuremanufacturers, produce products that fail to successfully developcomply with required quality standards, it may incur delays in fulfilling orders, write-downs, damage to our reputation and market new products could reduce our margins, which would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.damages resulting from product liability claims.

If our products do not perform as expected or the reliability of the technology on which our products are based is questioned, we could experience lost revenue, delayed or reduced market acceptance of our products, increased costs and damage to our reputation.

Our success depends on the market’s confidence that we can provide reliable, high-quality bioprocessing products. We believe that customers in our target markets are likely to be particularly sensitive to product defects and errors. Our reputation and the public image of our products and technologies may be impaired if our products fail to perform as expected. Although our products are tested prior to shipment, defects or errors could nonetheless occur in our products. Furthermore, the Protein A that we manufacture is subsequently incorporated into products that are sold by other life sciences companies and we have no control over the manufacture and

production of those products. In the future, if our products experience, or are perceived to experience, a material defect or error, this could result in loss or delay of revenues, delayed market acceptance, damaged reputation, diversion of development resources, legal claims, increased insurance costs or increased service and warranty costs, any of which could harm our business. Such defects or errors could also narrow the scope of the use of our products, which could hinder our success in the market. Even after any underlying concerns or problems are resolved, any lingering concerns in our target market regarding our technology or any manufacturing defects or

performance errors in our products could continue to result in lost revenue, delayed market acceptance, damaged reputation, increased service and warranty costs and claims against us.

If we are unable to manufacture our products in sufficient quantities and in a timely manner, our operating results will be harmed, our ability to generate revenue could be diminished and our gross margin may be negatively impacted.

Our revenues and other operating results will depend in large part on our ability to manufacture and assemble our products in sufficient quantities and in a timely manner. Any interruptions we experience in the manufacturing or shipping of our products could delay our ability to recognize revenues in a particular quarter. Manufacturing problems can and do arise, and as demand for our products increases, any such problems could have an increasingly significant impact on our operating results. While we have not generally experienced problems with, or delays in, our production capabilities that resulted in delays in our ability to ship finished products, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter such problems in the future. We may not be able to quickly ship products and recognize anticipated revenues for a given period if we experience significant delays in the manufacturing process. In addition, we must maintain sufficient production capacity in order to meet anticipated customer demand, which carries fixed costs that we may not be able to offset if orders slow, which would adversely affect our operating margins. If we are unable to manufacture our products consistently, in sufficient quantities, and on a timely basis, our bioprocessing revenue, gross margins and our other operating results will be materially and adversely affected.

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly, our customers’ future purchases are difficult to predict and any failure to meet financial expectations may result in a decline in our stock price.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate in the future as a result of many factors such as the impact of seasonal spending patterns, changes in overall spending levels in the life sciences industry, the inability of some of our customers to consummate anticipated purchases of our products due to changes inend-user demand, and other unpredictable factors that may affect ordering patterns. Because our revenue and operating results are difficult to predict, we believe thatperiod-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not a good indicator of our future performance. Additionally, if revenue declines in a quarter, whether due to a delay in recognizing expected revenue, adverse economic conditions or otherwise, our results of operations will be harmed because many of our expenses are relatively fixed. In particular, a large portion of our manufacturing costs, our research and development, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses are not significantly affected by variations in revenue. Further, our gross margins are dependent on product mix. A shift in sales mix away from our higher margin products to lower margin products will adversely affect our gross margins. If our quarterly operating results fail to meet investor expectations, the price of our common stock may decline.

Our future revenues pursuantSecurities or industry analysts may not publish favorable research or reports about our business or may publish no information, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

The trading market for our asset purchase agreement with BioMarincommon stock is influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us and our business. We do not have any control over these analysts and we cannot provide any assurance that analysts will cover us or provide favorable coverage. If any of the analysts who cover us issue an adverse opinion regarding the HDACi program depends significantly on BioMarin’s development and commercialization activities, over which we have no control.our stock price, our business or stock price would likely decline. If BioMarin is unableone or determines not to further develop or commercialize the HDACi program, or experiences significant delays in doing so, we may see a delay in receiving any potential milestone or royalty paymentsmore of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to receive any additional financial benefits from the program.

We entered into an asset purchase agreement with BioMarin on January 21, 2014, related to the histone deacetylase inhibitor (“HDACi”) portfolio, which includes the Friedreich’s ataxia program. We are dependent on BioMarin for the future success of this development program. We have no control over the conduct and timing of development efforts with respect to the HDACi program. BioMarin’s failure to devote sufficient financial and other resources to the development plan may resultregularly publish reports covering us, we could lose visibility in the delayedmarket, which in turn could cause our stock price or unsuccessful development of the program, which could leadtrading volume to the non-payment or delay in payment of milestones under the asset purchase agreement and may preclude or delay commercialization of any product under the HDACi program and any royalties we could receive on future commercial sales. Our future financial results may be harmed if BioMarin does not commercialize the HDACi program successfully or on a timely basis prior to the achievement of any milestones or the payment of any royalties to us.decline.

Health care reform measures could adversely affect our business.

The efforts of governmental and third-party payors to contain or reduce the costs of health care may adversely affect the business and financial condition of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including us.ours. Specifically, in both the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory proposals to change the health care system in ways that could affect our ability to sell our products profitably. The U.S. Congress passed the America Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 andFor example, in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and is considering a numberEducation Reconciliation Act of proposals that are intended to reduce or limit2010 (together, the growth of“Affordable Care Act”), was passed, which substantially changes the way health care costsis financed by both governmental and which couldprivate insurers and significantly transformimpacts the market for pharmaceuticals products. We expect furtherU.S. life sciences industry. The Affordable Care Act and other federal and state proposals and health care reforms to continue to be proposed by legislators, which could limit the prices that can be charged for the products we develop and may limit our commercial opportunity. In the United States, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, also called the Medicare Modernization Act (the “MMA”) changed the way Medicare covers and pays for pharmaceutical products. These cost reduction initiatives and other provisions of this legislation could decrease the coverage and price that we receive for any approved products and could seriously harm our business. While the MMA applies only to drug benefits for Medicare beneficiaries, private payors often follow Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement rates, and any reduction in reimbursement that results from the MMA may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors. The continuing efforts ofEfforts by the government and other third-party payors to contain or reduce the costs of health care through various means may limit our commercial opportunities and result in a decrease in the price of our common stock or limit our ability to raise capital.

Recent federal government efforts have been aimed at amending or repealing all or portions of existing health care reform legislation, including the Affordable Care Act. Changes in existing health care reform measures may result in uncertainty with respect to legislation, regulation and government policy that could significantly impact our business and the life sciences industry.

The enactment of legislation implementing changes in taxation of international business activities, the adoption of other corporate tax reform policies, or changes in tax legislation or policies could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.

Corporate tax reform, base-erosion efforts and tax transparency continue to be high priorities in many tax jurisdictions where we have business operations. As a result, policies regarding corporate income and other taxes in numerous jurisdictions are under heightened scrutiny and tax reform legislation is being proposed or enacted in a number of jurisdictions. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Tax Reform Act”), adopting broad U.S. corporate income tax reform will, among other things, reduce the U.S. corporate income tax rate, but will impose base-erosion prevention measures on earnings ofnon-U.S. subsidiaries of U.S. entities as well as the transition tax on mandatory deemed repatriation of accumulatednon-U.S. earnings of U.S. controlled foreign corporations. There is no assurance that our actual income tax liability will not be materially different than what is reflected in our income tax provisions and accruals.

In addition, many countries are beginning to implement legislation and other guidance to align their international tax rules with the Organisation for EconomicCo-operation and Development’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting recommendations and action plan that aim to standardize and modernize global corporate tax policy, including changes to cross-border tax, transfer pricing documentation rules, and nexus-based tax incentive practices. Because of the heightened scrutiny of corporate taxation policies, prior decisions by tax authorities regarding treatments and positions of corporate income taxes could be subject to enforcement activities, and legislative investigation and inquiry, which could also result in changes in tax policies or prior tax rulings. Any such changes in policies or rulings may also result in the taxes we previously paid being subject to change.

Due to the large scale of our international business activities, any substantial changes in international corporate tax policies, enforcement activities or legislative initiatives may materially adversely affect our business, the amount of taxes we are required to pay and our financial condition and results of operations generally.

We compete with life science, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies who are capable of developing new approaches that could make our products and technology obsolete.

The market for therapeutic and commercial products is intensely competitive, rapidly evolving and subject to rapid technological change. LifeWe compete with several medium and small companies in each of our product categories as well as several large companies, including GE Healthcare, Danaher Corporation (Pall), Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., MilliporeSigma and Sartorius. These competitors, as well as other life science, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies may have substantially greater financial, manufacturing, marketing, and research and development resources than we have. Newhave, as well as stronger name recognition, longer operating histories and benefits derived from greater economies of scale. These factors, among others, may enable our competitors to market their products at lower prices or on terms more advantageous to customers than what we can offer. Competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, new approaches by these competitors may make our products and technologies obsolete or noncompetitive.

We may become subject to litigation, which could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our business.

From time to time, we may become involved in litigation or other legal proceedings relating to claims arising from the ordinary course of business. Litigation is subject to inherent risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. If we receive an adverse judgment in any litigation, we could be required to pay substantial damages. With or without merit, litigation can be complex, can extend for a protracted period of time, can be very expensive and the expense can be unpredictable. Litigation initiated by us could also result in counter-claims against us, which could increase the costs associated with the litigation and result in our payment of damages or other judgments against us. In addition, litigation, and any related publicity, may divert the efforts and attention of some of our management and key personnel, which could adversely affect our business.

We may be exposed to liabilities under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and any determination that we violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act (the “FCPA”) and other laws that prohibit improper payments or offers of payments to foreign governments and their officials and political parties by U.S. persons and issuers as defined by the statute for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We have operations and agreements with third parties and make sales in jurisdictions outside of the U.S.,United States, which may experience corruption. Our activities in jurisdictions outside of the U.S.United States create the risk of unauthorized payments or offers of payments by one of our employees, consultants, sales agents or distributors, because these parties are not always subject to our control. These risks have increased following the Novozymes Acquisition.our recent acquisitions of overseas operations and facilities. It is our policy to implement safeguards to discourage these practices by our employees. However, our existing safeguards and any future improvements may prove to be less than effective, and the employees, consultants, sales agents or distributors of our Company may engage in conduct for which we might be held responsible. Violations of the FCPA may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions, and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could negatively affect our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, the government may seek to hold us liable for successor liability FCPA violations committed by any companies in which we invest or that we acquire.

Our stock price could be volatile, which could cause shareholders to lose part or all of their investment.

The market price of our common stock, like that of the common stock of many other companies with similar market capitalizations, is highly volatile. In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume

fluctuations. This volatility has significantly affected the market prices of securities of many life sciences,

biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies for reasons frequently unrelated to or disproportionate to the operating performance of the specific companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Our growth potential is changing as we evolve from an organization that was heavily involved in research and development to an organization with a strategic focus on our bioprocessing business.

In connection with the Company’s decision to focus its efforts on the growth of its core bioprocessing business, the Company has terminated its therapeutic product development activities. The core bioprocessing business on which the Company now focuses will provide growth opportunities that are different than those of a research and development oriented biotechnology company. As a result, the price of the Company’s common stock may behave differently than it has historically and, during the shift in our business, may behave in a manner not expected by securities analysts and investors. If the Company’s future business focused on bioprocessing generates results that fall below the revised expectations of securities analysts and investors, the trading price of the Company’s common stock could decline.

As a result of these risks, we may not be able to achieve the expected benefits of any such transaction or deliver the value thereof to our shareholders. If we are unsuccessful in consummating any such transaction, we may be required to reevaluate our business only after we have incurred substantial expenses and devoted significant management time and resources.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents, certain of our contracts with third parties, and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us, even one that may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation andby-laws may delay or prevent an acquisition of us or a change in our management. These provisions include the ability of our board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval. In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which limits the ability of stockholders owning in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock to merge or combine with us. Although we believe these provisions collectively provide for an opportunity to obtain greater value for stockholders by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors, they would apply even if an offer rejected by our board were considered beneficial by some stockholders. Additionally, certain of our contracts with third parties allow for termination upon specified change of control transactions. Anti-takeover provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management, and anti-takeover or change of control contract termination rights may frustrate or prevent any attempts by a third party to acquire or attempt to acquire the Company.

Changes in accounting standards and subjective assumptions, estimates, and judgments by management related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results or financial condition.

Generally accepted accounting principles and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines, and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our business, such as revenue recognition, asset impairment and fair value determinations, inventories, business combinations and intangible asset valuations, leases, and litigation, are highly complex and involve many subjective assumptions, estimates, and judgments. Changes in these rules or their interpretation or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates, or judgments could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance or financial condition.

Our results of operations could be negatively affected by potential fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

We conduct a large portion of our business in international markets. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, 33%2018, 28% of our revenuerevenues and 23%15% of our costs and expenses were denominated in foreign currencies, primarily

the Swedish Kroner,Krona, the British pound sterling, and the Euro. We are exposed to the risk of an increase or decrease in the value of the foreign currencies relative to the U.S. Dollar, which could increase the value of our expenses and decrease the value of our revenue when measured in U.S. Dollars. As a result, our results of operation may be influenced by the effects of future exchange rate fluctuations and such effects may have an adverse impact on our common stock price.

Our ability to use net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and certainbuilt-in losses to reduce future tax payments is limited by provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, and it is possible that certain transactions or a combination of certain transactions may result in material additional limitations on our ability to use our net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.

Section 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, contain rules that limit the ability of a company that undergoes an ownership change, which is generally any change in ownership of more than 50% of its stock over a three-year period, to utilize its net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and certainbuilt-in losses recognized in years after the ownership change. These rules generally operate by focusing on ownership

changes involving stockholders owning directly or indirectly 5% or more of the stock of a company and any change in ownership arising from a new issuance of stock by the company. Generally, if an ownership change occurs, the yearly taxable income limitation on the use of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and certainbuilt-in losses is equal to the product of the applicable long term tax exemptlong-term,tax-exempt rate and the value of the company’s stock immediately before the ownership change. We may be unable to offset our taxable income with losses, or our tax liability with credits, before such losses and credits expire and therefore would incur larger federal income tax liability. We have completed a number of financings sinceWhile our inception which may have resulted in a change in control as defined by Section 382 analysis completed during 2018 did not show any current exposure, future transactions or couldcombinations of future transactions may result in a change in control under Section 382 in the future.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report financial results or prevent fraud. If we identify a material weaknessesweakness in our internal control over financial reporting, our ability to meet our reporting obligations and the trading price of our stock could be negatively affected.

A material weakness is a deficiency,Effective internal controls are necessary to provide reliable financial reports and to assist in the effective prevention of fraud. Any inability to provide reliable financial reports or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement ofprevent fraud could harm our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Accordingly, a material weakness increases the risk that the financial information we report contains material errors.

business. We regularly review and update our internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies. In addition, we are required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to report annually on our internal control over financial reporting. Any system of internal controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. For example, in 2012, we updated our internal controls to include our operations in Sweden. If we, or our independent registered public accounting firm, determine that our internal controls over financial reporting are not effective, or we discover areas that need improvement in the future or discover a material weakness, these shortcomings could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results, and the price of our common stock could be negatively affected. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Accordingly, a material weakness increases the risk that the financial information we report contains material errors.

If we cannot conclude that we have effective internal control over our financial reporting, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide an unqualified opinion regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which could lead to a decline in our stock price. Failure to comply with reporting requirements could also subject us to sanctions and/or investigations by the SEC, The NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market or other regulatory authorities.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report financial results or prevent fraud.

Effective internal controls are necessary to provide reliable financial reports and to assist in the effective prevention of fraud. Any inability to provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud could harm our business.

We must annually evaluate our internal procedures to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which requires management and our independent registered public accounting firm to assess the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

We are implementing a new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system and have recentlypreviously implemented several significant ERP modules and expect to implement additional ERP modules in the future. The implementation of the ERP system represents a change in our internal control over financial reporting. Although we continue to monitor and assess our internal controls in the new ERP system environment as changes are made and new modules are implemented, and we have taken additional steps to modify and enhance the design and effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, there is a risk that deficiencies may occur that could constitute significant deficiencies or in the aggregate a material weakness.

If we fail to remedy any deficiencies or maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny, civil or criminal penalties or shareholder litigation. In addition, failure to maintain adequate internal controls could result in financial statements that do not accurately reflect our operating results or financial condition.

Natural disasters, geopolitical unrest, war, terrorism, public health issues or other catastrophic events could disrupt the supply, delivery or demand of products, which could negatively affect our operations and performance.

We are subject to the risk of disruption by earthquakes, floods and other natural disasters, fire, power shortages, geopolitical unrest, war, terrorist attacks and other hostile acts, public health issues, epidemics or pandemics and other events beyond our control and the control of the third parties on which we depend. Any of these catastrophic events, whether in the United States or abroad, may have a strong negative impact on the global economy, our employees, facilities, partners, suppliers, distributors or customers, and could decrease demand for our products, create delays and inefficiencies in our supply chain and make it difficult or impossible for us to deliver products to our customers. A catastrophic event that results in the destruction or disruption of our data centers or our critical business or information technology systems would severely affect our ability to conduct normal business operations and, as a result, our operating results would be adversely affected.

Changes in laws and regulations governing the privacy and protection of data and personal information could adversely affect our business.

We are subject to data privacy and protection laws and regulations that apply to the collection, transmission, storage and use of proprietary information and personally-identifying information, which among other things, imposes certain requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of certain individually identifiable information. In addition, numerous other federal and state laws, including state security breach notification laws, state health information privacy laws and federal and state consumer protection laws, govern the collection, use, disclosure and security of personal information.

Various foreign countries also have, or are developing, laws governing the collection, use, disclosure, security, and cross-border transmission of personal information. The legislative and regulatory landscape for privacy and data protection continues to evolve, and there has been an increasing amount of focus on privacy and data protection issues with the potential to affect our business. For example, privacy requirements in the European Union (“EU”) govern the transfer of personal information from the European Economic Area to the United States. While we continue to address the implications of changes to the EU data privacy regulations, the area remains an evolving landscape with new regulations coming into effect and continued legal challenges and our efforts to comply with the evolving data protection rules may be unsuccessful. Failure to comply with laws regarding data protection would expose us to risk of enforcement actions taken by data protection authorities in the EU and the potential for significant penalties if we are found to benon-compliant. Similarly, failure to comply with federal and state laws in the United States regarding privacy and security of personal information could expose us to penalties under such laws. Even if we are not determined to have violated these laws, government investigations into these issues typically require the expenditure of significant resources and generate negative publicity, which could harm our business.

 

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

We currently leaseOur material office and occupy approximately 76,000 square feet of space located in Waltham, Massachusetts which serves as our corporate headquarters. We also conduct manufacturing research and development, marketing and administrative operations at this facility. This lease expires on May 31, 2023. We also rent approximately 2,500 square feet at a second location in Waltham, Massachusetts to provide for expanded manufacturing operations. This facility is rented on a month-to-month basis. We also lease four adjacent buildings in Lund, Sweden totaling approximately 45,000 square feet of space used primarily for manufacturing and administrative operations. The lease for three buildings totaling approximately 41,000 square feet expires on June 30, 2017, while the lease for the fourth building with approximately 4,000 square feet of space expires on September 30, 2019.leases are detailed below:

Location

Square Feet

Principal Use

Lease Expiration

Waltham, Massachusetts

75,594Corporate headquarters, manufacturing, research and development, marketing and administrative officesMay 31, 2023

Rancho Dominguez, California

68,908Manufacturing, research and development, marketing and administrative operationsJuly 15, 2020(1)

Marlborough, Massachusetts

63,761Manufacturing operationsNovember 30, 2028

Lund, Sweden

45,381Manufacturing and administrative operationsDecember 31, 2021

(1)

In 2018, we expanded our facility in Rancho Dominguez, California by approximately 15,000 square feet. The lease for the expanded portion of the facility expires on November 30, 2025.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2018, we incurred total rental costs for all facilities of approximately $2,619,000.$4.4 million.

 

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently aware of any such proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

 

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “RGEN.” The quarterly high and low sales prices for our common stock are shown in the following tables.

   Year Ended December 31, 2015 
   High   Low 

First Quarter

  $34.15    $19.53  

Second Quarter

  $42.48    $28.88  

Third Quarter

  $42.22    $27.25  

Fourth Quarter

  $36.00    $21.69  

   Year Ended December 31, 2014 
   High   Low 

First Quarter

  $17.26    $11.70  

Second Quarter

  $23.14    $12.60  

Third Quarter

  $24.68    $18.23  

Fourth Quarter

  $26.75    $19.02  

Stockholders and Dividends

As of February 18, 2016,22, 2019, there were 438353 stockholders of record of our common stock. We have not paid any dividends since our inception and do not intend to pay any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain all earnings, if any, to support our operations. Any future determination as to the payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 20152018 regarding shares of Common Stockcommon stock that may be issued under the Company’s equity compensation plans, consisting of the Second Amended and Restated 2001 Repligen Corporation Stock Plan, the 1992 Repligen CorporationAmended and Restated 2012 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and the current 20122018 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.

 

Plan Category

  Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options
 Weighted-
average
exercise price of
outstanding
options
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in first column) (2)
   Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants
and rights
 Weighted-
average

exercise price of
outstanding
options,  warrants
and rights
 Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation

plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
 
  (a) (b) (c) 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

   1,240,935(1)  $10.44(2)   2,441,761     1,703,639(1)   $27.54(2)   2,874,751 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   N/A   $N/A    N/A  
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   1,240,935   $10.44    2,441,761  

 

(1)

Includes 1,054,584998,226 shares of Common Stockcommon stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options and 186,351705,413 shares of Common Stockcommon stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units.units (“RSUs”). No shares of restricted stock are outstanding.

(2)

Since restricted stock unitsRSUs do not have any exercise price, such units are not included in the weighted average exercise price calculation.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In June 2008, the Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to 1.25 million shares of our common stock to be repurchased at the discretion of management from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program has no set expiration date and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. We did not repurchase any shares of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2015.2018. In prior years, we repurchased a total of 592,827 shares, leaving 657,173 shares remaining under this authorization.

The graph below matches Repligen Corporation’s cumulative 69-month5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the NASDAQ Composite index, the NASDAQ Pharmaceutical index, and the NASDAQ Biotechnology index. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock and in each index (with the reinvestment of all dividends) from MarchDecember 31, 20102013 to December 31, 2015.2018.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*

Among Repligen Corporation, the NASDAQ Composite Index,

the NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index and the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index

 

LOGO

*$100 invested on 12/31/13 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.

Fiscal year ending December 31.

The information contained in the performance graph shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and such information shall not be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), except to the extent that Repligen specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities and Equity Purchases by the Company

In June 2014, in connection with the Refine Acquisition, we issued and sold 215,285 unregistered shares of our common stock to Refine Technology, LLC, an accredited investor, in exchange for certain of Refine’s assets and contract rights related to its ATF system. This issuance was intended to be exempt from the registration requirements pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506(b) promulgated under Regulation D.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected consolidated financial data are derived from the audited financial statements of Repligen. The selected financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this Annual Report, and in our Annual Reports on Form10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014, 20132018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2012 and our Transition Report on Form 10-K for the nine months ended December 31, 2011.2014.

 

(In thousands, except per share data) 2015 (1) 2014 2013 2012 (2) Nine Months Ended
December 31,
2011
 
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2018 (1) 2017(2) 2016 2015(3) 2014 
  (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) 

Revenue:

           

Product revenue

 $83,537   $60,431   $47,482   $41,834   $13,215    $193,891  $141,089  $104,441  $83,537  $60,431 

Royalty and other revenue

  —      3,117    20,687    20,433    10,235     141  147  100   —    3,117 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total revenue

  83,537    63,548    68,169    62,267    23,450     194,032  141,236  104,541  83,537  63,548 

Operating expenses:

     

Operating costs and expenses:

      

Cost of product revenue

  35,251    28,022    22,481    24,957    5,157     86,531  67,050  47,117  35,251  28,022 

Cost of royalty and other revenue

  —      —      2,682    2,213    1,315  

Research and development

  5,740    5,609    7,341    10,490    9,462     15,821  8,672  7,355  5,740  5,609 

Selling, general and administrative

  24,699    17,154    12,701    13,227    9,050     65,692  51,509  30,853  24,699  17,154 

Contingent consideration – fair value adjustments

  4,083    2,072    91    611    —       —     —    3,242  4,083  2,072 

Gain on bargain purchase

  —      —      —      (314  (427
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total operating expenses

  69,773    52,857    45,296    51,184    24,557  

Total operating costs and expenses

   168,044  127,231  88,567  69,773  52,857 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

  13,764    10,691    22,873    11,083    (1,107

Investment income

  136    309    301    219    161  

Interest expense

  (32  (50  (50  (57  (28

Other income (expense)

  (445  188    (110  26    (623

Income from operations

   25,988  14,005  15,974  13,764  10,691 

Other expenses, net

   (4,552 (6,757 (4,282 (341 447 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

  13,423    11,138    23,014    11,271    (1,597

Income tax (benefit) provision

  4,078    2,968    6,921    (2,885  16  

Income before income taxes

   21,436  7,248  11,692  13,423  11,138 

Income tax provision (benefit)

   4,819  (21,105 11  4,078  2,968 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss)

 $9,345   $8,170   $16,093   $14,156   $(1,613

Net income

  $16,617  $28,353  $11,681  $9,345  $8,170 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings (loss) per share:

     

Earnings per share:

      

Basic

 $0.28   $0.25   $0.51   $0.46   $(0.05  $0.38  $0.74  $0.35  $0.28  $0.25 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

 $0.28   $0.25   $0.50   $0.45   $(0.05  $0.37  $0.72  $0.34  $0.28  $0.25 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

           

Basic

  32,882    32,498    31,667    30,914    30,774     43,767  38,234  33,573  32,882  32,498 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

  33,577    33,264    32,407    31,253    30,774     45,471  39,150  34,099  33,577  33,264 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011   As of December 31, 

Balance Sheet Data:

     

Cash and marketable securities (3)

 $73,407   $62,003   $73,842   $49,970   $36,025  
  2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 
  (Amounts in thousands) 

Cash and marketable securities(4)

  $193,822  $173,759  $141,780  $73,407  $62,003 

Working capital

  84,471    70,264    75,049    55,457    39,431     145,897  217,571  163,078  84,471  70,264 

Total assets

  146,237    128,293    118,645    97,010    76,057     774,621  743,519  288,913  146,237  128,293 

Long-term obligations

  4,708    5,879    3,458    2,133    2,606     29,211  126,760  99,074  4,708  5,879 

Accumulated deficit

  (71,542  (80,887  (89,057  (105,151  (119,307   (15,568 (31,508 (59,861 (71,542 (80,887

Stockholders’ equity

  122,748    111,732    103,886    84,125    65,987  

Total stockholders’ equity

   615,568  591,548  168,764  122,748  111,732 

 

(1)

Includes the full year impact of the Refine Acquisitionacquisition of Spectrum Lifesciences, LLC on June 2, 2014.August 1, 2017

(2)

Includes the full year impact of the Novozymes Acquisitionacquisition of Atoll GmbH on April 1, 2016 and the acquisition of TangenX Corporation on December 20, 2011.14, 2016.

(3)

Includes the full year impact of the acquisition of Refine Technology on June 2, 2014.

(4)

Excludes restricted cash of $450,000 for the year ended$0.5 million as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and $200,000 for all other years presented$0.2 million as of December 31, 2013 related to the lease arrangement on our headquarters’ lease arrangement.headquarters.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,Repligen and its subsidiaries, collectively doing business as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K do not constitute guarantees of future performance. Investors are cautioned that statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not strictly historical statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding current or future financial performance, potential impairment of future earnings, management’s strategy, plans and objectives for future operations or acquisitions, product development and sales, product candidate research and development, selling, general and administrative expenditures, intellectual property, development and manufacturing plans, availability of materials, and product and adequacy of capital resources and financing plans constitute forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, including, without limitation, the risks identified under the caption ��Risk Factors” and other risks detailed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as required by law.

Repligen Corporation (“Repligen,” the “Company”Repligen”, “we”, “our”, or “we”“the Company”) is a leading provider of advanced bioprocessing company focused on the development, productiontechnology and commercialization of innovative productssolutions used in the process of manufacturing biologic drugs. Our products are made to substantially increase biopharmaceutical manufacturing efficiencies and flexibility. As the global biologics market continues to experience strong growth and expansion, our customers – primarily large biopharmaceutical companies and contract manufacturing organizations – face critical production cost, capacity, quality and time pressures that our products are made to address. Our commitment to bioprocessing is helping set new standards for the way our customers manufacture biologic drugs (“bioprocessing”). Biologic drugs include– including monoclonal antibodies, recombinant proteins, and vaccines and representgene therapies. We are dedicated to “inspiring advances in bioprocessing” as a growing area of drug development. Our customers include leading life sciences companies, global biopharmaceutical companies, and contract manufacturers worldwide. The high-value technologies that we provide enable biologics manufacturers to cost-effectively increase drug production yields while retaining the highest quality and safety standards.

Repligen is a longtime global market leadertrusted partner in the manufactureproduction of biologic drugs that improve human health worldwide.

Our Chromatography products featurepre-packed chromatography columns under our OPUS® brand. OPUS columns, which we deliver to our customerspre-packed with their choice of chromatography resin, are single-campaign(“single-use”) disposable columns that replace the use of traditional (more permanent) glass columns used in downstream purification processes. By designing OPUS as an advanced and flexible option for the purification of biologics from process development through clinical-scale and some commercial manufacturing, Repligen has become a leader inpre-packed columns.

Our Filtration products offer a number of advantages to manufacturers of biologic drugs at volumes that span from pilot studies to clinical and commercial-scale production. XCell ATF systems are used primarily in upstream perfusion (“continuous manufacturing”) processes to increase cell concentration and significantly improve biologic product yield from a bioreactor. To address increasing industry demand for“plug-and-play” technology, we developed and in 2016 launchedsingle-use formats of the original stainless steel XCell ATF device. In December 2016, we acquired TangenX Technology Corporation (“TangenX”), balancing our upstream XCell ATF offering with a downstream portfolio of flat-sheet filters and cassettes used in biologic drug purification and formulation processes. The TangenX portfolio includes thesingle-use SIUS TFF brand, providing customers with a high-performance,low-cost alternative to reusable TFF products. In August 2017, we completed our acquisition of Spectrum. Spectrum brands include the KrosFlo® family of products, ProConnex® disposable flow-path products, TFF systems and others. The Spectrum acquisition significantly strengthened our Filtration product line and diversifies our end markets beyond mAbs to include vaccine, recombinant protein and gene therapies.

We are a leading OEM manufacturer and supplier of Protein A ligands sold to life sciences companies under long term supply agreements.companies. Protein A is a critical reagentligands are an essential “binding” component of Protein A chromatography resins used to purify therapeuticin the purification of virtually all monoclonal antibodiesantibody (“mAbs”mAb”) based drugs on the market (over 50) or in development (over 300). In December 2011, we strengthenedthat our Protein A market leadership with the acquisition of Novozymes’s bioprocessing business (“Novozymes”) in Lund, Sweden (the “Novozymes Acquisition”).

We established and have executed on a diversification strategy to selectively expand the number of bioprocessing products that wecustomers sell direct to end users. With the Novozymes Acquisition, we gained a portfoliousers (biopharmaceutical manufacturers) for use in downstream purification of mAbs. We also manufacture and sell growth factors, led by LONG® R3 IGF-1, which isfactor products used into supplement cell culture media in order to increase productivity. LONG®R3 IGF-1 is soldcell growth and productivity in collaboration with MilliporeSigma (formerly Sigma Aldrich), our exclusive distributor for the product. We also developed and directly market our OPUS® process-scale line of pre-packed chromatography columns for the capture and purification of biologic drugs in clinical development. Most recently, in June 2014, we acquired the business of Refine Technology, including Refine’s Alternating Tangential Flow (“ATF”) System, a best-in-class device used to generate extremely high cell concentrations during the fermentation step of the biologic drug manufacturing process (the “Refine Business” and the acquisition of the Refine Business, the “Refine Acquisition”).

We market our products globally through a direct commercial organization in the U.S., Europe and Asia, as well as through strategic partners in select markets. In 2014 and 2015, we invested in expanding our global commercial organization, adding world-class sales, marketing and applications personnel who interact directly with our end users. Our customer base comprises of leading life sciences companies, major contract manufacturers and 20 of the top 25 biopharmaceutical companies.bioreactor.

Customers use our products to produce initial quantities of drug for clinical studies and thenscale-up to larger volumes as the drug progresses to commercial production following regulatory approval. Detailed specifications

for a drug’s manufacturing process are included in the applications that must be approved bybiopharmaceutical companies file for marketing approval with regulators, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, throughout the clinical trial process and prior to final commercial approval. As a result, products that become part of the manufacturing specifications of a late-stage clinical or commercial process can be very “sticky” due tosensitive given the regulatory hurdles, costs and uncertainties associated with displacing them.

Many of our products are early in their adoption cycle,

Critical Accounting Policies and together with the expansion of our commercial organization and strategic acquisitions, have contributed to product revenue expansion from $41.8 million in 2012 to $83.5 million in 2015. To meet increased demand for our products, we have increased the volume and scale of manufacturing at our two manufacturing facilities in the U.S. and Sweden.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATESEstimates

While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, we have identified the policies and estimates below as being critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The impact of and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations are discussed throughout “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition,” including in the “Results of Operations” section, where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results.

Revenue recognition

Product Sales

We generate revenue from the sale of bioprocessing products, equipment devices, and related consumables used with these equipment devices to customers in the life science and biopharmaceutical industries. On product sales to end customers, revenue is recognized, net of discounts, when both the title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer, as determined by the shipping terms provided there are no uncertainties regarding acceptance, and all obligations have been completed. Generally, our product arrangements for equipment sales are multiple element arrangements, and may include services, such as installation and training, and multiple products, such as consumables and spare parts. In accordanceUnder ASC 606, “Revenue from Contracts with ASC 605-25, based on terms and conditions of the product arrangements, the Company believes that these services and undelivered products can be accounted for separately from the delivered product element as the delivered products have value to our customers on a standalone basis. Accordingly, revenue for services not yet performed at the time of product shipment are deferred and recognized as such services are performed. The relative selling price of any undelivered products is also deferred at the time of shipment and recognized as revenue when these products are delivered. For product sales to distributors, the Company recognizes revenue for both equipment and consumables upon delivery to the distributors unless direct shipment to the end user’s is requested. In this case, revenue is recognized upon delivery to the end user’s location. In general, distributors are responsible for shipment to the end customer along with installation, training and acceptance of the equipment by the end customer. Shipments to distributors are not contingent upon resale of the product. We have a few longstanding customers who comprise the majority of revenue and have excellent payment histories and therefore we do not require collateral. We have had no significant write-offs of uncollectible invoices in the periods presented.

At the time of sale, we also evaluate the need to accrue for warranty and sales returns. The supply agreements we have with our customers and related purchase orders identify the terms and conditions of each sale and the price of the goods ordered. Due to the nature of the sales arrangements, inventory produced for sale is tested for quality specifications prior to shipment. Since the product is manufactured to order and in compliance with required specifications prior to shipment, the likelihood of sales return, warranty or other issues is largely diminished. Furthermore, there is no customer right of return in our sales agreements. Sales returns and warranty issues are infrequent and have not had a material impact on our financial statements historically.

Shipping and handling fees are recorded as a component of product revenue, with the associated costs recorded as a component of cost of product revenue.

Orencia RoyaltyCustomers,”

In April 2008, we settled our outstanding litigation with Bristol and began recognizing royalty revenue from that settlement in fiscal year 2009 for Bristol’s net sales in the United States of Orencia®, which is used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Pursuant to the settlement with Bristol, we recognized royalty revenue of $17,881,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Revenue earned from Bristol royalties was recorded in the periods when it was earned based on royalty reports sent by Bristol to us. We have no continuing obligations to Bristol as a result of this settlement. Our royalty agreement with Bristol provided that we would receive such royalty payments on sales of Orencia® by Bristol through December 31, 2013. These royalty payments have ceased.

Pfizer License Agreement

In December 2012, we entered into an exclusive worldwide licensing agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Pfizer to advance the SMA program, which is led by RG3039 and also includes backup compounds and enabling technologies. Under the terms of the License Agreement, we received $5 million from Pfizer as an upfront payment on January 22, 2013, a $1 million milestone payment on September 4, 2013 and a $1 million milestone payment on December 28, 2014. On January 26, 2015, Pfizer sent us a termination notice, and the License Agreement expired on April 25, 2015.

BioMarin License Agreement

On January 21, 2014, we out-licensed our histone deacetylase inhibitor (“HDACi”) portfolio, which includes the Friedreich’s ataxia program, to BioMarin Pharmaceuticals Inc., or BioMarin. Under the terms of the agreement, Repligen received an upfront payment of $2 million in January 2014 from BioMarin and a $125,675 payment in September 2014 upon tech transfer, and we have the potential to receive up to $160 million in future milestone payments for the development, regulatory approval and commercial sale of portfolio compounds included in the agreement. In addition, Repligen is eligible to receive royalties on sales of qualified products developed.

Research and Development Agreements

We did not recognize any revenue from sponsored research and development projects in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, we recognized $1,589,000 of revenue from sponsored research and development projects under agreements with the National Institutes of Health / Scripps Research Institute, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, GoFar and the European Friedrich’s Ataxia Consortium for Translational Studies.

Research revenue is recognized when, the expense has been incurred and services have been performed. Determination of which incurred costs qualify for reimbursementor as, obligations under the terms of our contractual agreementsa contract are satisfied, which occurs when control of the promised products or services is transferred to customers. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring products or services to a customer (“transaction price”). To the extent the transaction price includes variable consideration, the Company estimates the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price utilizing the expected value method or the most likely amount method, depending on the facts and circumstances relative to the timingcontract. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price if, in the Company’s judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of when such costs were incurred involvescumulative revenue under the judgmentcontract will not occur. Estimates of management. Our calculationsvariable consideration and determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based uponlargely on an assessment of the agreed-upon termsCompany’s anticipated performance and all information (historical, current and forecasted) that is reasonably available. Sales, value add, and other taxes collected on behalf of third parties are excluded from revenue.

When determining the transaction price of a contract, an adjustment is made if payment from a customer occurs either significantly before or significantly after performance, resulting in a significant financing component. Applying the practical expedient in paragraph606-10-32-18, the Company does not assess whether a significant financing component exists if the period between when the Company performs its obligations under the contract and when the customer pays is one year or less. None of the Company’s contracts contained a significant financing component as stated inof December 31, 2018.

Contracts with customers may contain multiple performance obligations. For such arrangements, the arrangements. However, shouldtransaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the estimated calculations changerelative standalone selling prices of the promised products or be challenged by other partiesservices underlying each performance obligation. The Company determines standalone selling prices based on the price at which the performance obligation is sold separately. If the standalone selling price is not observable through past transactions, the Company estimates the standalone selling price taking into account available information such as market conditions and internally approved pricing guidelines related to the agreements, researchperformance obligations.

The Company recognizes product revenue may be adjustedunder the terms of each customer agreement upon transfer of control to the customer, which occurs at a point in subsequent periods. The calculations have not historically changed or been challenged, and we do not anticipate any significant subsequent change in revenue related to sponsored research and development projects.time.

There have been no material changes to our initial estimates related to revenue recognition in any periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.Inventories

Inventories

Inventories relate to our bioprocessing business. We value inventory at cost or, if lower, fair marketnet realizable value, using thefirst-in,first-out method. We review our inventory at least quarterly and record a provision for excess

and obsolete inventory based on our estimates of expected sales volume, production capacity and expiration dates of raw materials,work-in-process and finished products. Expected sales volumes are determined based on supply forecasts provided by key customers for the next three to 12 months. We write down inventory that has become obsolete, inventory that has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value, and inventory in excess of expected requirements to cost of product revenue. Manufacturing of bioprocessing finished goods is done to order and tested for quality specifications prior to shipment.

A change in the estimated timing or amount of demand for our products could result in additional provisions for excess inventory quantities on hand. Any significant unanticipated changes in demand or unexpected quality failures could have a significant impact on the value of inventory and reported operating results. During all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, there have been no material adjustments related to a revised estimate of inventory valuations.

Business combinations

Amounts paid for acquisitions are allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, if any, based on their fair values at the dates of acquisition. The fair value of identifiable intangible assets is based on detailed valuations that use information and assumptions determined by management. Any excess of purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired is allocated to goodwill. The fair value of contingent consideration includes estimates and judgments made by management regarding the probability that future contingent payments will be made, the extent of royalties to be earned in excess of the defined minimum royalties, etc. Management updates these estimates and the related fair value of contingent consideration at each reporting period based on the estimated probability of achieving the earnout targets and applying a discount rate that captures the risk associated with the expected contingent payments. To the extent our estimates change in the future regarding the likelihood of achieving these targets we may need to record material adjustments to our accrued contingent consideration. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are recorded in our Statementconsolidated statement of Operations. The largestoperations and most judgmental component of our contingent consideration relates to the contingent consideration tied to Refine sales targets. The remaining maximum potential liability related to Refine’s sales based contingent consideration is $9.9 million, and we have accrued approximately $6.4 million as of December 31, 2015 as the estimated fair value. Fair value estimates are based on our projections of future Refine sales.comprehensive income.

We use the income approach to determine the fair value of certain identifiable intangible assets including customer relationships and developed technology. This approach determines fair value by estimatingafter-tax cash flows attributable to these assets over their respective useful lives and then discounting theseafter-tax cash flows back to a present value. We base our assumptions on estimates of future cash flows, expected growth rates, expected trends in technology, etc. We base the discount rates used to arrive at a present value as of the date of acquisition on the time value of money and certain industry-specific risk factors. We believe the estimated purchased customer relationships, developed technologies, trademark / tradename, patents, and in process research and development amounts so determined represent the fair value at the date of acquisition and do not exceed the amount a third party would pay for the assets.

Intangible assets and goodwill

Intangible Assetsassets

We amortize our intangible assets that have finite lives using the straight-line method. Amortization is recorded over the estimated useful lives ranging from 82 to 1520 years. We review our intangible assets subject to amortization to determine if any adverse conditions exist or a change in circumstances has occurred that would indicate impairment or a change in the remaining useful life. Further, we also review our indefinite-lived intangible assets not subject to amortization to determine if any adverse conditions exist or a change in circumstances occurred that would indicate an impairment. If the carrying value of an asset exceeds its estimated

undiscounted cash flows, we will write-down the carrying value of the intangible asset to its fair value in the period identified. In assessing fair value, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and discount rates. If these estimates or related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges. We generally calculate fair value as the present value of estimated future cash flows to be generated by the asset using a risk-adjusted discount rate. If the estimate of an intangible asset’s remaining useful life is changed, we will amortize the remaining carrying value of the intangible asset prospectively over the revised remaining useful life.

Goodwill

We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if events and circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Events that

would indicate impairment and trigger an interim impairment assessment include, but are not limited, to current economic and market conditions, including a decline in market capitalization, a significant adverse change in legal factors, business climate or operational performance of the business, and an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. Our annual impairment test date is the last day of our fiscal year, December 31 2015. The Company performed itsst. While we currently operate as one operating segment, we perform our annual impairment test over each of the Company’s onetwo reporting unitunits and concluded that goodwill was not impaired.

Accrued liabilities

We estimate accrued liabilities by identifying services performed on our behalf, estimating the level of service performed and determining the associated cost incurred for such service as of each balance sheet date. For example, we would accrue for professional and consulting fees incurred with law firms, audit and accounting service providers and other third partythird-party consultants. These expenses are determined by either requesting those service providers to estimate unbilled services at each reporting date for services incurred or tracking costs incurred by service providers under fixed fee arrangements.

We have processes in place to estimate the appropriate amounts to record for accrued liabilities, which principally involve the applicable personnel reviewing the services provided. In the event that we do not identify certain costs that have begun to be incurred or we under or over-estimate the level of services performed or the costs of such services, the reported expenses for that period may be too low or too high. The date on which certain services commence, the level of services performed on or before a given date, and the cost of such services often require the exercise of judgment. We make these judgments based upon the facts and circumstances known at the date of the financial statements.

A change in the estimated cost or volume of services provided could result in additional accrued liabilities. Any significant unanticipated changes in such estimates could have a significant impact on our accrued liabilities and reported operating results. There have been no material adjustments to our accrued liabilities in any of the periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Stock-based compensation

We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the fair value of share-based awards on the grant date.

The expected term of options granted represents the period of time for which the options are expected to be outstanding and is derived from our historical stock option exercise experience and option expiration data. For purposes of estimating the expected term, we have aggregated all individual option awards into one group, as we do not expect substantial differences in exercise behavior among our employees. The expected volatility is a measure of the amount by which our stock price is expected to fluctuate during the expected term of options granted. We determined the expected volatility based upon the historical volatility of our common stock over a

period commensurate with the option’s expected term. The risk-free interest rate is the implied yield available on U.S. Treasuryzero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the option’s expected term on the grant date. We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on any of our capital stock and do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, we use an expected dividend yield of zero to calculate the grant-date fair value of a stock option.

We recognize compensation expense on awards that vest based on service conditions on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period based upon the number of options that are ultimately expected to vest, and accordingly, such compensation expense has been adjusted by an amount of estimated forfeitures. We recognize compensation expense on awards that vest based on performance conditions based on our assessment of the probability that the performance condition will be achieved over the service period. Forfeitures represent only the unvested portion of a surrendered option. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary,

in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Based on an analysis of historical data, we have calculated an 8% annual forfeiture rate fornon-executive level employees, a 3% annual forfeiture rate for executive level employees, and a 0% forfeiture rate fornon-employee members of the Board of Directors, which we believe are reasonable assumptions to estimate forfeitures. However, the estimation of forfeitures requires significant judgment and, to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from our current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised.

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, we recorded stock-based compensation expense of approximately $3,598,000, $1,766,000$10.2 million, $6.7 million and $1,060,000,$4.6 million, respectively, for share-based awards granted under all of the Company’s stock plans.

As of December 31, 2015,2018, there was $6,547,000$27.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based awards. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average remaining requisite service period of 3.084.53 years. We expect 623,6521,195,236 unvested options and RSUs to vest over the next five years.

Income Taxestaxes

Deferred taxes are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided, if, based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We account for uncertain tax positions using a “more-likely-than-not”“more-likely-than-not” threshold for recognizing and resolving uncertain tax positions. The evaluation of uncertain tax positions is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in tax law, the measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns, the effective settlement of matters subject to audit, new audit activity and changes in facts or circumstances related to a tax position. We evaluate our tax position on a quarterly basis. We also accrue for potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONSResults of Operations

The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the related footnotes thereto.

Revenues

Total revenues for fiscal years 2015, 2014,2018, 2017, and 20132016 were comprised of the following:

 

   Years ended December 31,   % Change 
   2015   2014   2013   2015 vs. 2014  2014 vs. 2013 
   (in thousands, except percentages) 

Bioprocessing product revenue

  $83,537    $60,431    $47,482     38  27

Royalty and other revenue

   —       3,117     20,687     (100%)   (85%) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenue

  $83,537    $63,548    $68,169     31  (7%) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
   For the Years Ended December 31,   2018 vs. 2017  2017 vs. 2016 
   2018   2017   2016   $ Change  % Change  $ Change   % Change 
   (Amounts in thousands, except for percentage data) 

Revenue:

            

Product

  $193,891   $141,089   $104,441   $52,802   37.4 $36,648    35.1

Royalty and other

   141    147    100    (6  (4.1%)   47    47.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenue

  $194,032   $141,236   $104,541   $52,796   37.4 $36,695    35.1
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Product revenues

The majority ofSince 2016, we have been increasingly focused on selling our bioprocessing products are sold to customers who incorporate our products into their proprietary antibody purification processes for monoclonal antibodies. These customers then sell their products directly to customers in the pharmaceutical industry.industry and to our its contract manufacturers. These direct sales have increased to approximately 72% of our product revenue during 2018. We expect that direct sales will continue to account for an increasing percentage of our product revenues. Sales of our bioprocessing products can therefore be impacted by the timing of large-scale production orders and the regulatory approvals for such antibodies, which may result in significant quarterly fluctuations.

Product revenues were comprised of the following:

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2018   2017(1)   2016(2,3) 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Chromatography products

  $45,326   $36,309   $29,520 

Filtration products

   90,586    49,050    19,774 

Protein products

   54,375    53,969    54,716 

Other

   3,604    1,761    431 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total product revenue

  $193,891   $141,089   $104,441 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

2017 revenue for filtration, chromatography and other products includes revenue related to Spectrum from August 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.

(2)

2016 revenue for filtration products includes revenue related to TangenX from December 14, 2016 through December 31, 2016.

(3)

2016 revenue for chromatography products includes revenue related to Atoll from April 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016.

Revenue from protein products includes our Protein A ligands and cell culture growth factors. Revenue from filtration products includes our XCell ATF Systems and consumables, KrosFlo filtration products and SIUS filtration products. Revenue from chromatography products includes our OPUS and OPUS PD chromatography columns, chromatography resins and ELISA test kits. Other revenue primarily consists of revenue from the sale of our operating room products to hospitals as well as freight revenue.

For fiscal 2015, bioprocessing2018, product salesrevenue increased by $23,106,000$52.8 million, or 38%37%, as compared to fiscal 2014,2017. The increase is due to the continued adoption of our products by our key bioprocessing customers and a full year of revenues derived from our acquisition of Spectrum in August 2017. Sales of our bioprocessing products are impacted by the timing of orders, development efforts at our customers orend-users and regulatory approvals for biologics that incorporate our products, which may result in significant quarterly fluctuations. Such quarterly fluctuations are expected, but they may not be predictive of future revenue or otherwise indicate a trend.

For 2017, product revenues increased by $36.6 million, or 35%, as compared to 2016. The increase in product revenues is due largely to increased volumes in our affinity ligandFiltration and ATF products.Chromatography products, full year of revenue generated from Atoll and TangenX in 2017, and revenues of $19.4 million generated from the acquisition of Spectrum in 2017. We sell our various bioprocessing products at different price points. The mix of products sold varies and impacts the fluctuations in total product revenue and cost of product revenues from period to period.

For fiscal 2014, bioprocessing productRoyalty revenues

Royalty revenues in 2018 and 2017 relate to royalties received from a third-party systems manufacturer associated with our OPUS PD chromatography columns. Royalty revenues are variable and are dependent on sales increasedgenerated by $12,949,000 or 27% as compared to fiscal 2013 primarily due to sales of the ATF System following the Refine Acquisition.our partner.

Pursuant to the settlement with Bristol, we recognized royalty revenue of $17,881,000 in fiscal 2013. As this royalty arrangement with Bristol expired on December 31, 2013, we do not recognize any further royalty revenue from Bristol.

We recognized $2,126,000 of revenue for fiscal 2014 from the out-license of our HDACi portfolio to BioMarin on January 21, 2014. We also recognized $1,000,000 and $1,217,000 of revenue for fiscal 2014 and 2013, respectively, from the out-license of our Spinal Muscular Atrophy program to Pfizer on December 28, 2012. In fiscal 2013, we also recognized $1,589,000 of revenue from sponsored research and development projects under agreements with the National Institutes of Health / Scripps Research Institute, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, GoFar and the European Friedrich’s Ataxia Consortium for Translational Studies. We did not recognize any such revenue in fiscal 2015, and we do not expect to recognize any research and license revenue or to receive any incremental funding for our therapeutic development programs going forward.

Costs and operating expenses

Total costs and operating expenses for fiscal years 2015, 2014,2018, 2017 and 20132016 were comprised of the following:

 

  Years ended
December 31,
   % Change   For the Years Ended December 31,   2018 vs. 2017 2017 vs. 2016 
  2015   2014   2013   2015 vs. 2014 2014 vs. 2013   2018   2017   2016   $ Change   % Change $ Change % Change 
  (in thousands, except percentages)   (Amounts in thousands, except for percentage data) 

Cost of product revenue

  $35,251    $28,022    $22,481     26  25  $86,531   $67,050   $47,117   $19,481    29.1 $19,933  42.3

Cost of royalty and other revenue

   —       —       2,682     —      (100%) 

Research and development

   5,740     5,609     7,341     2  (24%)    15,821    8,672    7,355    7,149    82.4 1,317  17.9

Selling, general and administrative

   24,699     17,154     12,701     44  35   65,692    51,509    30,853    14,183    27.5 20,656  66.9

Contingent consideration – fair value adjustments

   4,083     2,072     91     97  2,177   —      —      3,242    —      N/A  (3,242 (100.0%) 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total costs and operating expenses

  $69,773    $52,857    $45,296     32  17  $168,044   $127,231   $88,567   $40,813    32.1 $38,664  43.7
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cost of product revenue

For fiscal 2015,2018, cost of product revenue increased $7,229,000$19.5 million, or 26%29%, as compared to fiscal 2014.2017 due primarily to the increase in product revenue mentioned above. Gross margins may fluctuate in future quarters based on expected production volume and product mix. For 2017, cost of product revenue increased $19.9 million, or 42% as compared to 2016. This increase is primarily due to the increasedincrease in product revenuerevenues noted above. For fiscal 2014,above, the sale of higher cost of product revenue increased $5,541,000 or 25% as compared to fiscal 2013. This increase is primarilySpectrum finished goods inventory due to the increased product revenue noted abovestep up to fair value upon acquisition, and the addition of the Refine Business.costs related to continuing investments in our operations to support future growth.

Gross margins were 58%55%, 54%53%, and 53%55% for fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively. During fiscal 2015,2018, gross margins increased compared to fiscal 20142017 primarily due to favorable Refine margins, increased capacity utilization andhigher product mix.revenue. During fiscal 2014,2017, gross margins increaseddeclined slightly compared to fiscal 20132016 due to favorable Refine margins, increased capacity utilizationproduct mix, the sale of higher cost Spectrum finished good inventory due to step up to fair value upon acquisition and product yield which offset highercontinuing investments in operations to support future growth.

Research and development expenses related to our facility expansion to bring manufacturing for our ATF systems to our Waltham facility.

Pursuant to the settlement with Bristol, we remitted 15% of royalty revenue received through the expiration of the agreement in December 2013 to the University of Michigan. Cost of royalty revenue for fiscal year 2013 was $2,682,000. As this royalty arrangement with Bristol expired on December 31, 2013, we do not expect to incur any further cost of royalty revenue to the University of Michigan.

During fiscal 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, research and development expenses were primarily related to bioprocessing products which included personnel, supplies and other research expenses. In August 2012, we announced a strategic focus on our Bioprocessing business and a simultaneous effort to find partners, out-licensing opportunities or other funding arrangements with external parties to reduce or eliminate the net expenditures on research and development activities for our therapeutic programs. In January 2013, we announced that we entered into an outlicensing agreement with Pfizer, Inc. for our Spinal Muscular Atrophy program, under an arrangement that would provide $5.0 million up front and up to $65.0 million in milestone payments, plus royalties. On January 26, 2015, Pfizer notified us that they were terminating this arrangement for convenience effective as of April 26, 2015. In January 2014, we announced that we entered into an outlicensing agreement with BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. for our Friedreich’s ataxia portfolio, under an arrangement that would provide $2.0 million up front and up to $160.0 million in future milestones, plus royalties.

Due to the small size of the Company and the fact that these various programs share personnel and fixed costs, we do not track all of our expenses or allocate any fixed costs by program, and therefore, have not provided an estimate of historical costs incurred by project. In addition to the legacy product research and development, the currentsingle-use XCell ATF project incurs expenses related to product development, sterilization, validation testing, and other research related expenses.

For fiscal 2015,2018, research and development expenses increased by $131,000$7.1 million, or 2%.82%, as compared to 2017. This increase is primarily driven by investments made during 2018 to expand our proteins product offerings through our development agreement with Navigo Proteins GmbH (“Navigo”). Additionally, the increase is related to product development activities acquired as part of the timing of expenditures, including personnel, suppliesSpectrum acquisition and otherincreased activity in our various bioprocessing development expenses related to our new products in development.projects.

For fiscal 2014,2017, research and development expenses decreasedincreased by $1,732,000$1.3 million, or 24%.18% as compared to 2016. This decreaseincrease is directly related to the increased expenditures related to the continued development of our decisionsingle-use XCell ATF products and other new products in 2012 to exit therapeutic drug development, and is partially offsetas well as expenses incurred by an increase in bioprocessing research and development expense.Spectrum since acquisition.

We expect our research and development expenses in the year ending December 31, 2016, which relate2019 to bioprocessingincrease in order to support new product development, to increase.development.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses include the costs associated with selling our commercial products and costs required to support our marketing efforts, including legal, accounting, patent, shareholder services, amortization of intangible assets and other administrative functions.

For fiscal 2015,2018, SG&A costs increased by $7,545,000$14.2 million, or 44%28%, as compared to fiscal 2014. This2017. The increase is primarily due to higherselling and administrative expenses related toactivities incurred following the implementation of an inventory accounting software package,Spectrum acquisition, as well as the continued buildout of our administrative infrastructure to support expected future growth and thecontinued expansion of our customer-facing activities to drive sales of our bioprocessing products. This increase is partially offset by $818,000 of closing and transition costs incurred in 2014 related to the Refine Acquisition. We expect SG&A expenses to increase in the year ending December 31, 2016 as we continue to expand our sales and marketing activities to drive future sales of our bioprocessing products.

For fiscal 2014,2017, SG&A costs increased by $4,454,000$20.7 million, or 35%67%, as compared to fiscal 2013.2016. This increase is primarily due to costs related to our acquisition of Spectrum, the continuing buildout of our administrative infrastructure to support future growth, the continuing expansion of our customer-facing activities to drive sales of our bioprocessing products, a full year of costs related to Atoll and marketing activitiesTangenX and closing and transition costs associated with the Refine Acquisition.incurred by Spectrum since acquisition.

Contingent Considerationconsideration

For fiscal 2015, ourIn 2016, we recorded contingent consideration liability increased approximately $2,943,000 comparedexpense related primarily to fiscal 2014. The increase is primarily attributed to a $4,048,000 increase in the fair valueour acquisitions of the contingent

consideration stemming from the Refine acquisition, partially offset by payments of approximately $1,139,000. The contingent consideration for this period stems from the BioFlash and Refine acquisitions. The contingent consideration related to BioFlash is valued using management’s estimates of royalties to be paid to the former shareholders of BioFlash based on sales of the acquired assets. The contingentAtoll. Contingent consideration related to the Refine Acquisition in 2016 is valued using management’s estimates of expected future milestone payments based on forecastedactual 2016 XCell ATF sales of the acquired assets and portion of any receipts that might be received in connection withrelated to the resolution, withdrawal or settlement of certain patent disputes with a third party to be paid to the former shareholders of Refine. The fair value of contingent consideration at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $6,788,000 and $3,845,000, respectively.

For fiscal 2014, our contingent consideration liability increased approximately $2,196,000 compared to fiscal 2013. The increase is primarily attributed to $3,321,000 stemming from the Refine Acquisition. The contingent consideration for this period stems from the Novozymes, BioFlash and Refine acquisitions. The contingentContingent consideration related to the Novozymes AcquisitionAtoll is based uponon actual amounts remaining2016 sales growth compared to be paid2015 sales. The decrease is attributable to Novozymes Denmark per the Deed of Settlement and Amendment entered into on May 5, 2014. Therecording Refine contingent consideration fair value adjustments related to BioFlashprojected 2015 and 2016 XCell ATF sales in the previous year, while in 2016 we only recorded fair value adjustments related to 2016 sales. This decrease is valued using management’s estimatespartially offset by contingent consideration expense related to our acquisition of royaltiesAtoll. Because the contingent consideration periods related to be paid to the former shareholdersour acquisitions of BioFlash, based on sales of the acquired assets. TheRefine and Atoll all concluded in 2016, we did not incur any contingent consideration related to the Refine Acquisition is valued using management’s estimates of expected future milestone payments based on forecasted sales of the acquired assets and portion of any receipts that might be receivedexpense in connection with the resolution, withdrawal or settlement of certain patent disputes with a third party to be paid to the former shareholders of Refine.2017.

Other expenses, net

The table below provides detail regarding our other expenses, net:

   For the Years Ended December 31,  2018 vs. 2017  2017 vs. 2016 
   2018  2017  2016  $ Change  % Change  $ Change  % Change 
   (Amounts in thousands, except for percentage data) 

Investment income

  $1,895  $371  $346  $1,524   410.8 $25   7.2

Interest expense

   (6,709  (6,441  (3,768  (268  4.2  (2,673  70.9

Other expenses

   262   (687  (860  949   (138.1%)   173   (20.1%) 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total other expense, net

  $(4,552 $(6,757 $(4,282 $2,205   (32.6%)  $(2,475  57.8
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

Investment income

Investment income includes income earned on invested cash balances. Investment incomeThe increase of $1.5 million for fiscal 2015, 2014,2018, as compared to 2017 was attributable to higher average invested cash balances and 2013 was $136,000, $309,000, and $301,000, respectively.higher interest rates on such invested cash balances. The decreaseincrease of $173,000approximately $25,000, or 56%7%, for fiscal 20152017 was primarily due to lower invested funds during 2015 compared to 2014. The increase of $8,000 or 3% for fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013 was due to slightly higher interest rates and adjusted investment mix.during 2017 compared to 2016. We expect investment income to vary based on changes in the amount of funds invested and fluctuation of interest rates.

Interest expense

Interest expense primarily relates to interest related to our issuance of 2.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2021 (the “Notes”) in May 2016. Interest expense increased $0.3 million in 2018, as compared to 2017 due to the

decrease in the balance of debt issuance costs that are being amortized. As these costs decrease the carrying value of the debt increases and interest calculated based on the carrying value increases as well. The increase of $2.7 million in 2017, as compared to 2016 was due to incurring a full year of interest expense on the Notes in 2017.

Other expenses

Changes in other expense in 2018, compared to the corresponding periods in the prior year are primarily attributable to foreign currency gains related to amounts due fromnon-Swedish kronor-based customers and cash balance denominated in U.S. dollars and British pounds held by Repligen Sweden AB.

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

TheIncome tax provision (benefit) for income taxes forthe years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:

  For the Years Ended December 31,  2018 vs. 2017  2017 vs. 2016 
  2018  2017      2016      $ Change   % Change  $ Change  % Change 
  (Amounts in thousands, except for percentage data) 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 $4,819  $(21,105 $11  $25,924    >(100% $(21,116  >(100%

Effective tax rate

  22.5  (291.2%  0.1     

For the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled $4,078,000. Our current2018, we recorded an income tax provision of $3,745,000$4.8 million. The effective tax rate was 22.5% in 2018 and is based upon the estimated income from the year and the composition of the income in different jurisdictions. The effective tax rate was higher than the U.S. statutory rate of 21% due to state tax effects and the impact of the Global IntangibleLow-Taxed Income tax enacted as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Tax Act”) enacted in December 2017.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded an income tax benefit of ($21.1) million. This income tax benefit was composed of current income tax provision of $3.6 million, offset by ($24.7) million deferred tax benefit. The 2017 tax provision of $3.6 million primarily relates to a foreign tax provision of $3,507,000 and $315,000 related to the resolution of our uncertain tax position for historic research and development credits and certain state apportionment matters.$3.3 million. Our deferred tax provisionbenefit of $333,000($24.7) million is primarily due to an increasea reduction of the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets in the amount of $12.2 million from the sale of certain intellectual property to Repligen Sweden AB during 2017 and taxable temporary differences generated from the Spectrum acquisition. Additionally, the Company recorded a deferred tax benefit of $12.8 million resulting from a reduction of the U.S. federal income tax on the Company’s net U.S. deferred tax liabilities stemming from new U.S. federal tax legislation passed in December 2017.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We providenon-GAAP adjusted income from operations,non-GAAP adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA as supplemental measures to GAAP measures regarding our operating performance. These financial measures exclude the impact of certain acquisition related items and, therefore, have not been calculated in accordance with GAAP. A detailed explanation and a reconciliation of eachnon-GAAP financial measures to tax amortizationits most comparable GAAP financial measures are described below.

We include this financial information because we believe these measures provide a more accurate comparison of indefinite lived intangibles.

The provision for income taxesour financial results between periods and more accurately reflect how management reviews its financial results. We excluded the impact of certain acquisition related items because we believe that the resulting charges do not accurately reflect the performance of our ongoing operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 totaled $2,968,000. Our current tax provisionperiod in which such charges are incurred.

Non-GAAP adjusted income from operations

Non-GAAP adjusted income from operations is measured by taking income from operations as reported in accordance with GAAP and excluding acquisition and integration costs, inventorystep-up charges, intangible

amortization and contingent consideration expenses booked through our consolidated statements of $2,481,000 primarily relatescomprehensive income. The following is a reconciliation of income from operations in accordance with GAAP to a foreign tax provision of $2,670,000 and $125,000 related to an uncertain tax position for historic research and development credits. Our deferred tax provision of $488,000 is primarily due to an increase in deferred tax liabilities related to tax amortization of indefinite lived intangibles.

In June 2015, we received a final assessmentnon-GAAP adjusted income from the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (“DOR”) regarding an examinationoperations for the years ended MarchDecember 31, 20102018 and 20112017:

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
       2018           2017     
   (Amounts in thousands) 

GAAP income from operations

  $25,988   $14,005 

Non-GAAP adjustments to income from operations:

    

Acquisition and integration costs

   2,928    7,519 

Inventorystep-up charges

   —      3,816 

Intangible amortization

   10,518    6,215 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted income from operations

  $39,434   $31,555 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted net income

Non-GAAP adjusted net income is measured by taking net income as reported in accordance with GAAP and excluding acquisition and integration costs and related tax effects, inventorystep-up charges, contingent consideration expenses, intangible amortization and related tax effects,non-cash interest expense, the partial release of the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets and the nine months ended December 31, 2011. This examination relatednet impact of tax reform legislation booked through our consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The following is a reconciliation of net income in accordance with GAAP to the qualification of Research and Development tax credits. The final settlement resulted in a payment to the DOR of approximately $141,000.

In December 2015, we reached a negotiated settlement with the DOR regarding an appeal of an assessment made in 2013non-GAAP adjusted net income for the years ended MarchDecember 31, 20082018 and 2009.2017:

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2018   2017 
   Amount   Fully Diluted
Earnings per
Share
   Amount   Fully Diluted
Earnings per
Share
 
   (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) 

GAAP net income

  $16,617   $0.37   $28,353   $0.72 

Non-GAAP adjustments to net income:

        

Acquisition and integration costs

   2,928    0.06    7,519    0.19 

Inventorystep-up charges

   —      —      3,816    0.10 

Intangible amortization

   10,518    0.23    6,215    0.16 

Non-cash interest expense

   4,248    0.09    3,977    0.10 

Tax effect of intangible amortization and acquisition costs

   (979   (0.02   (882   (0.02

Release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets

   —      —      (12,236   (0.31

Net impact of tax reform legislation

   —      —      (9,586   (0.24
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted net income

  $33,332   $0.73   $27,176   $0.69 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note that earnings per share amounts may not add due to rounding.

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA is measured by taking net income as reported in accordance with GAAP, excluding investment income, interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and excluding acquisition and integration costs, inventorystep-up charges and contingent consideration expenses booked through our consolidated statements of comprehensive income. The primary issuesfollowing is a reconciliation of net income in the appeal relatedaccordance with GAAP to the sourcing of intellectual property settlementsadjusted EBITDA for years ended December 31, 2018 and the qualification of Research and Development tax credits. The final settlement resulted in a payment to the DOR of approximately $1,012,000.

2017:

       For the Years Ended December 31,     
   2018           2017         
   (Amounts in thousands) 

GAAP net income

  $16,617   $28,353 

Non-GAAP EBITDA adjustments to net income:

    

Investment income

   (1,895   (371

Interest expense

   6,709    6,441 

Tax provision

   4,819    (21,105

Depreciation

   5,213    4,237 

Amortization

   10,565    6,215 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

EBITDA

   42,028    23,770 

Othernon-GAAP adjustments:

    

Acquisition and integration costs

   2,928    7,519 

Inventorystep-up charges

   —      3,816 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $44,956   $35,105 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liquidity and capital resourcesCapital Resources

We have financed our operations primarily through revenues derived from product sales, research grants, as well as proceeds and royalties from license arrangements, the issuance of the Notes in May 2016 and a litigation settlement.the issuance of common stock in our July 2017 public offering. Our revenue for the foreseeable future will primarily be limited to our bioprocessing product revenue.

At December 31, 2015,2018, we had cash and cash equivalents of $193.8 million compared to cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $73,407,000 compared to $62,003,000$173.8 million at December 31, 2014. In fiscal 2014 we utilized $21,236,000 of cash in the Refine Acquisition and invested an additional $3,400,000 in the expansion of our Waltham manufacturing and administrative facility.2017. A deposit for our leased office spacein Waltham, Massachusetts of $450,000 and $200,000 is$0.5 million was classified as restricted cash and iswas not included in cash and marketable securities totals for December 31, 2015 or2016. There were no restrictions on cash for December 31, 2014, respectively.2018 and 2017.

In July 2017, we completed a public offering in which 2,807,017 shares of our common stock were sold to the public at a price of $42.75 per share. The underwriters were granted an option, which they exercised in full, to purchase an additional 421,052 shares of our common stock. The total proceeds from this offering, net of underwriting discounts, commissions and other offering expenses, totaled $129.3 million.

On August 1, 2017, we completed our acquisition of Spectrum for $112.8 million in cash (net of cash received) and 6,153,995 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock.

During the fourth quarter of 2018, the closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeded 130% of the conversion price of the Notes for more than 20 trading days of the last 30 consecutive trading days of the quarter. As a result, the Notes are convertible at the option of the holders of the Notes during the first quarter of 2019. The Notes have a face value of $115.0 million and a carrying value of $103.5 million and are classified as current liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018. It is the Company’s policy and intent to settle the face value of the Notes in cash and any excess conversion premium in shares of our common stock. Between the end of the fourth quarter and the date of this filing, none of the Notes have been converted by the holders of such Notes.

Cash flows

 

(In thousands)    

Cash provided by (used in)

  Year ended
December 31,
2015
   Increase /
(Decrease)
 Year ended
December 31,
2014
 Increase /
(Decrease)
 Year ended
December 31,
2013
 
  For the Years Ended December 31, FY18 vs FY17 FY17 vs FY16 
  2018 2017 2016 $ Change $ Change 
  (Amounts in thousands) 

Operating activities

  $15,053    $(3,348 $18,401   $(7,529 $25,930    $32,770  $17,451  $7,521  $15,319  $9,930 

Investing activities

   4,791     24,583    (19,792  (1,886  (17,906   (14,037 (98,696 (49,194 84,659  (49,502

Financing activities

   767     (913  1,680    (842  2,522     3,407  129,945  112,113  (126,538 17,832 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

   (2,077 2,376  (2,299 (4,453 4,675 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

  $20,063  $51,076  $68,141  $(31,013 $(17,065
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating activities

For fiscal 2015,2018, our operating activities provided cash of $15,053,000$32.8 million reflecting net income of $9,345,000$16.6 million andnon-cash charges totaling $12,158,000 including$30.3 million primarily related to depreciation, amortization,non-cash interest expense, deferred tax expense and stock-based compensation charges. An increase in receivables consumed $8.7 million of cash and was primarily driven by the 37%year-to-date increase in revenues. An increase in inventory levels to accommodate future revenue growth consumed $4.0 million of cash, payment of accrued liabilities consumed $1.4 million of cash and an increase in other assets used $1.8 million. This utilization of cash is partially offset by $2.3 million of cash provided by an increase in accounts payable due to the timing of payments to vendors. The remaining cash flow used in operations resulted from net unfavorable changes in various other working capital accounts.

For 2017, our operating activities provided cash of $17.5 million, reflecting net income of $28.4 million offset by netnon-cash charges totaling $3.4 million comprised mainly of depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation charges and deferred tax benefits. Increases in accounts receivable consumed $6.9 million of cash, which is based on timing of revenues billed to and payments from customers. Decreases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities consumed $1.2 million of cash due to timing of payments to vendors.

For 2016, our operating activities provided cash of $7.5 million reflecting net income of $11.7 million andnon-cash charges totaling $11.3 million comprised mainly of depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation charges, deferred tax changesbenefits and the revaluation of contingent consideration. Increases in accounts payablereceivable and long-term liabilities provided an additional $5,139,000 of cash. Increases in accounts receivable, inventories and prepaid expenses and other current assets consumed $10,155,000$9.4 million of cash. Decreases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities consumed $1,592,000$5.8 million of cash.

For fiscal 2014,Investing activities

Our investing activities consumed $14.0 million of cash, including $12.8 million for capital expenditures. Of those expenditures, $2.1 million represented capitalized costs related to our operating activities provided cashinternal-use software. In addition, a capitalized payment for developed technology of $18,401,000 reflecting net income of $8,170,000 and non-cash charges totaling $8,188,000 including depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation charges, deferred tax asset valuation allowance changes and the revaluation of contingent consideration. Decreases$1.3 million was paid to Navigo in royalties and other receivables and increases2018 to assist in accounts payable provided an additional $6,557,000 and $2,288,000 of cash. Increases in accounts receivable, inventories and prepaid expenses and other current assets consumed $3,277,000 of cash. Decreases in accrued liabilities and long term liabilities consumed $3,525,000 of cash.expanding our proteins product offerings through a development agreement.

For fiscal 2013, our operating activities provided cash of $25,930,000 reflecting net income of $16,093,000 and non-cash charges totaling $7,055,000 including depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation charges, deferred tax asset valuation allowance changes and the revaluation of contingent consideration. Decreases in royalties and other receivables and in prepaid expenses and increases in accrued and long term liabilities provided an additional $2,457,000 and $2,458,000 of cash. Increases in accounts receivable and inventories as well as a decrease in accounts payable consumed $1,400,000 and $734,000 of cash.

Investing activities

We place our marketable security investments in high quality credit instruments as specified in our investment policy guidelines. For fiscal 2015,2017, our investing activities provided $4,791,000consumed $98.7 million of cash. We used $112.8 million in cash (net of cash comprisedreceived) for our acquisition of $7,419,000 of netSpectrum. Fixed asset additions consumed $5.5 million, as we continued to increase our manufacturing capacity. Net redemptions of marketable securities offset by $2,628,000provided $19.6 million of fixed asset additions. In fiscal 2014,cash in 2017.

For 2016, our investing activities consumed $19,792,000$49.2 million of cash. We used $8.8 million in cash (net of cash comprisedreceived) for our acquisition of $21,236,000Atoll and $35.8 million (net of cash received) for the Refine Acquisition, $5,602,000our acquisition of fixedTangenX. Fixed asset additions consumed $4.3 million, as we completedincreased the second phasemanufacturing capacity of our Waltham facility

expansionfacilities in the United States and a $250,000 increase in restricted cash related to our amended lease for our Waltham facility and partially offset by $7,296,000 of net redemptions of marketable securities. In fiscal 2013, our investing activities consumed $17,906,000 of cash, which is comprised of $13,272,000 of netSweden. Net purchases of marketable securities and $4,635,000consumed $0.3 million of fixed asset additions as we completedcash in 2016.

Financing activities

In 2018, our financing activities provided $3.4 million of cash. We received proceeds of $3.4 million from stock option exercises, partially offset by cash outlays of $11,000 related to the partial conversion of the Notes in the first phasequarter of 2018.

In July 2017, we received net proceeds of $129.3 million from the issuance of common stock. In May 2016, we received net proceeds of $111.1 million from the issuance of our Waltham facility expansion.

Financing activities

senior convertible notes. Exercises of stock options provided cash receipts of $866,000, $1,680,000$2.4 million and $2,450,000$1.8 million in fiscal 2015, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. In fiscal 2013, an excess tax benefitCash payments to Atoll and Refine in 2017 totaled $5.1 million, of which $1.7 million related to stock option exercises provided $72,000. Payments to Refine in 2015 related to achieving 2014 sales goals totaled $1,000,000, of which $99,000 related to ourthe fair value of this liabilitythese liabilities as of the respective acquisition datedates and is included as part of financing activities. Cash payments to Refine and BioFlash in 2016 totaled $4.1 million, of which $0.8 million related to the fair value of these liabilities as of the respective acquisition dates and is included as part of financing activities. The remaining amounts are included as an offset to our cash provided by operating activities.

Off-balance sheet arrangements Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any special purpose entities oroff-balance sheet financing arrangements.

Contractual obligationsObligations

As of December 31, 2015,2018, we had the following fixed obligations and commitments (in thousands):commitments:

 

  Payments Due By Period   Total   Less than
one year
   One to
three years
   Three to
five years
   Over five
years
 
  Total   Less than 1
Year
   1 –3 Years   3 –5 Years   More than 5
Years
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Convertible senior notes

  $114,989   $114,989   $—     $—     $—   

Operating lease obligations

  $11,497    $2,343    $3,322    $2,789    $3,043     18,034    4,021    6,862    3,529    3,622 

Purchase obligations (1)

   5,729     5,729     —       —       —       29,043    29,043    —      —      —   

Contingent consideration (2)

   6,788     4,480     2,308     —       —    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $24,014    $12,552    $5,630    $2,789    $3,043    $162,066   $148,053   $6,862   $3,529   $3,622 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Primarily represents purchase orders for the procurement of raw material for manufacturing.

(2)Represents the current estimated fair value of contingent consideration amounts relating to acquisitions. These amounts are recorded in accrued expenses and long term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. We have contingent consideration for an earnout pertaining to the Refine Acquisition, and upon the achievement of certain milestones in the Asset Purchase Agreement entered into with Refine, we could make additional payments of up to $9.9 million. It is not possible to predict with reasonable certainty whether these milestones will be achieved or the timing for achievement.

The table excludes a liability for uncertain tax positions totaling $2.9 million since we cannot currently make a reliable estimate of the period in which the liability will be payable, if ever. Please see Note 7,“Income Taxes,”to our consolidated financial statements for more information.

Capital requirementsRequirements

Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the following:

 

the expansion of our bioprocessing business;

 

the ability to sustain sales and profits of our bioprocessing products;

 

our ability to acquire additional bioprocessing products;

 

our ability to realize value from our outlicensed early stage CNS programs and the RG1068 program;

the scope of and progress made in our research and development activities;

 

the extent of any share repurchase activity; and

 

the success of any proposed financing efforts.

Absent acquisitions of additional products, product candidates or intellectual property, we believe our current cash balances are adequate to meet our cash needs for at least the next 24 months. We expect operating expenses

in the year ending December 31, 20162019 to increase as we continue to expand our bioprocessing business. We expect to incur continued spending related to the development and expansion of our bioprocessing product lines and expansion of our commercial capabilities for the foreseeable future. Our future capital requirements may include, but are not limited to, purchases of property, plant and equipment, the acquisition of additional bioprocessing products and technologies to complement our existing manufacturing capabilities, and continued investment in our intellectual property portfolio.

We plan to continue to invest in our bioprocessing business and in key research and development activities associated with the development of new bioprocessing products. We actively evaluate various strategic transactions on an ongoing basis, including licensing or acquiring complementary products, technologies or businesses that would complement our existing portfolio. We continue to seek to acquire such potential assets that may offer us the best opportunity to create value for our shareholders. In order to acquire such assets, we may need to seek additional financing to fund these investments. If our available cash balances and anticipated cash flow from operations are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, including because of any such acquisition-related financing needs or lower demand for our products, we may seek to sell common or preferred equity or convertible debt securities, enter into a credit facility or another form of third-party funding, or seek other debt funding. The sale of equity and convertible debt securities may result in dilution to our stockholders, and those securities may have rights senior to those of our common shares. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of preferred stock, convertible debt securities or other debt financing, these securities or other debt could contain covenants that would restrict our operations. Any other third-party funding arrangement could require us to relinquish valuable rights. We may require additional capital beyond our currently anticipated amounts. Additional capital may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all.

Net operating loss carryforwardsOperating Loss Carryforwards

At December 31, 2015,2018, we had utilized our remaining $19.5 million of net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $46,984,000 andcarryforwards. We had business tax credits carryforwards of approximately $1,920,000$2.9 million available to reduce future federal income taxes, if any. The net operating loss and business tax credits carryforwards will continue to expire at various dates through December 2035.2038. Net operating loss carryforwards and available tax credits are subject to review and possible adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service, state and foreign jurisdictions and may be limited in the event of certain changes in the ownership interest of significant stockholders.

Foreign earningsEarnings

As of December 31, 2018, the Company has accumulated undistributed earnings generated by our foreign subsidiaries of approximately $72.4 million. Because $58.0 million of such earnings have previously been subject to the one-time transition tax on foreign earnings required by the 2017 Tax Act, any additional taxes due with respect to such earnings or the excess of the amount for financial reporting over the tax basis of our foreign investments would generally be limited to foreign and state taxes. At December 31, 2015,2018, we have not provided for U.S. income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on outside basis differences of our foreign subsidiaries, of approximately $30,322,000 as we have the ability and intendintent to indefinitely reinvest the undistributed earnings of Repligen Sweden and Repligen Singapore Pte. Ltd.,our foreign subsidiaries, and there are no needs for such earnings in the U.S.United States that would contradict our plan to indefinitely reinvest.

Effects of inflationInflation

Our assets are primarily monetary, consisting of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. Because of their liquidity, these assets are not directly affected by inflation. Since we intend to retain and continue to use our equipment, furniture and fixtures and leasehold improvements, we believe that the incremental inflation related to replacement costs of such items will not materially affect our operations. However, the rate of inflation affects our expenses, such as those for employee compensation and contract services, which could increase our level of expenses and the rate at which we use our resources.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest rate riskRate Risk

We have historically held investments in commercial paper, U.S. Government and agency securities as well as corporate bonds and other debt securities. As a result, we arehave been exposed to potential loss from market risks that may occur as a result of changes in interest rates, changes in credit quality of the issuer or otherwise. We do not have any such investments as of December 31, 2018. As a result, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would have no effect on our cash position as of December 31, 2018.

We generally place our marketable security investments in high quality credit instruments, as specified in our investment policy guidelines. A hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would result in an approximate $93,000 decrease in the fair value of our investments as of December 31, 2015. We believe however, that the conservative nature of our investments mitigates our interest rate exposure, and our investment policy limits the amount of our credit exposure to any one issue, issuer (with the exception of U.S. agency obligations) and type of instrument. We do not expect any material loss from our marketable security investments and therefore believe that our potential interest rate exposure is limited.

Foreign exchange riskExchange Risk

Transactions byThe reporting currency of the Company is U.S. dollars, and the functional currency of each of our subsidiary, Repligen Sweden, may be denominated inforeign subsidiaries is its respective local currency. Our foreign currency exposures include the Swedish kronor, Euro, British pound, sterling, U.S. dollars, or in Euros whileChinese yuan, Japanese yen, Singapore dollar, South Korean won and Indian rupee; of these, the entity’s functionalprimary foreign currency isexposures are the Swedish krona. Certain sales transactions related to ATF system products are denominated in foreign currencies.kronor, Euro and British pound. Exchange gains or losses resulting from the translation between the transactional currency and the functional currency of Repligen Sweden and ATF System product sales are included in our consolidated statements of operations. The functional currency of the Company is U.S. dollars.net income. Fluctuations in exchange rates may adversely affect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows. We currently do not seek to hedge this exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates.

Although a majority of our contracts are denominated in U.S. dollars, 33%28% and 37%23% of total revenues during fiscal 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively, were denominated in foreign currencies while 23%15% and 31%24% of our costs and expenses during fiscal 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively, were denominated in foreign currencies, primarily operating expenses associated with cost of revenue, sales and marketing and general and administrative. In addition, 43%24% and 41%18% of our consolidated tangible assets were subject to foreign currency exchange fluctuations as of each of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively, while 21%6% and 27%8% of our consolidated liabilities were exposed to foreign currency exchange fluctuations as of each of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, respectively.

 

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Financial statements and supplementary data required by Item 8 are set forth at the pages indicated in Item 15(a) below and are incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

 

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

The Company’s management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inRules 13a-15(e) or15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act and as required by paragraph (b) of Rules13a-15 or15d-15 under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

(b) Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined inRule 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

 

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

 

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

 

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.2018. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established inInternal Control—Control – Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (COSO).

Subject to the foregoing, based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2015,2018, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form10-K, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.2018.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

(c) Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Our independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements included in this annual report has issued an attestation report on our internal controls over financial reporting. This report appears below.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Repligen Corporation:

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Repligen Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Repligen Corporation’sCorporation (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes and our report dated March 1, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Repligen Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Repligen Corporation as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 of Repligen Corporation and our report dated February 25, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

February 25, 2016March 1, 2019

(d) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Beginning in the second quarter of 2015, we added a number of new procedures to enhance our internal controls over revenue recognition and inventory costing. A number of these controls are automated system processes that were added in conjunction with the implementation of our enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system. Additional controls were added to ensure that procedures were subject to proper review and to ensure the accuracy of information entered into our ERP system. We reviewed and tested these new controls as part of our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls as of and for the year ended December, 31, 2015.

Except as otherwise described above, thereThere have not been anyno changes in the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting (as such term is definedidentified in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) underconnection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Securities Exchange Act) duringAct Rule13a-15 or Rule15d-15 that occurred in the quarterthree months ended December 31, 20152018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

Pursuant to General Instructions G to Form10-K, the information required for Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s proxy statement for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

PART IV

 

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form10-K:

(a) (1)Financial Statements:

The financial statements required by this item are submitted in a separate section beginning on page 3653 of this Report, as follows:

 

   Page 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   4954 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20152018 and December  31, 20142017

   5055 

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016

   5156 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016

   5257 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December  31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016

   5358 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   5459 

(a) (2)Financial Statement Schedules:

None.

(a) (3)Exhibits:

The Exhibits which are filed as part of this Annual Report or which are incorporated by reference are set forth in the Exhibit Index hereto.

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit
Number

  

Document Description

 2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated June  22, 2017, by and among Repligen Corporation, Top Hat, Inc., Swing Time, LLC, Spectrum, Inc., and Roy T. Eddleman (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on Form  8-K

 filed on June 23, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).
 3.1  

Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated June 30, 1992, as amended September 17, 1999 and

May  16, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference) (SEC File No. 000-14656).

 3.2  Amended and Restated Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Repligen Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference) (SEC File No. 000-14656).
    3.3Amendment No. 1 to theSecond Amended and Restated Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on December 20, 2011May 23, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).
    3.4Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 25, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
 4.1  

Specimen Stock Certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).

 4.2Base Indenture, dated as of May  24, 2016, by and between Repligen Corporation and Wilmington Trust, National Association (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Repligen Corporation’s AnnualCurrent Report on

Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 20028-K filed on May  24, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference) (SEC File No. 000-14656).

 4.3First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May  24, 2016, by and between Repligen Corporation and Wilmington Trust, National Association (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on8-K filed on May  24, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

Exhibit
Number

Document Description

 10.1*4.4  Employment Agreement,Form of 2.125% Convertible Senior Note due 2021 (included in Exhibit 4.3).
 4.5Second Supplemental Indenture, dated March 14, 1996,as of October 31, 2018, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated May  24, 2016, by and between Repligen Corporation and Walter C. HerlihyWilmington Trust Association (filed as Exhibit 10.34.1 to Repligen Corporation’s AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q for the yearquarter ended MarchOctober  31, 20022018 and incorporated herein by reference) (SEC File No. 000-14656).
 4.6Stockholder Agreement, dated June 22, 2017, by and between Repligen Corporation and Roy T.  Eddleman (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on June 23, 2017 and incorporate herein by reference).
  10.2*10.1*  Employment Agreement, dated March 14, 1996, between Repligen Corporation and James R. Rusche (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Repligen Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference) (SEC File No. 000-14656).
  10.3*Repligen Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on form8-K filed on December 14, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.4*10.2*  The Amended 1992 Repligen Corporation Stock Option Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Repligen Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference) (SEC File No. 000-14656).
  10.5*The Second Amended and Restated 2001 Repligen Corporation Stock Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on September 18, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.6.1*10.3.1*  The Amended and Restated 2001 Repligen Corporation Stock Option Plan, Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Repligen Corporation’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.6.2*10.3.2*  The Amended and Restated 2001 Repligen Corporation Stock Plan, Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on January 9, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.710.4+  Lease Between Repligen Corporation as Tenant and West Seyon LLC as Landlord, 35 Seyon Street, Waltham, MA (as amended to date).
10.5#Strategic Supplier Alliance Agreement dated January 28, 2010 by and between Repligen Corporation and GE HealthcareBio-Sciences AB) (as amended to date) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 20012016 and incorporated herein by reference) (SEC File No. 000-14656).

Exhibit
Number

10.6#
  

Document Description

  10.8#LicenseStrategic Supplier Alliance Agreement – Contract Manufacturing, by and between The Scripps Research InstituteGE HealthcareBio-Sciences AB and Repligen CorporationSweden AB (assuccessor-in-interest to Novozymes Biopharma Sweden AB), dated April 6, 2007as of July 7, 2011 (as amended to date) (filed as Exhibit 10.1810.2 to Repligen Corporation’s AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q for the yearquarter ended March 31, 20072016 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.9#10.7  Strategic Supplier Alliance Agreement dated January 28, 2010 by and between Repligen Corporation and GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Repligen Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.10First Amendment to Lease, dated July 5, 2011, by and between Repligen Corporation and TC Saracen, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 8, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.11Lease Between Repligen Sweden AB (assuccessor-in-interest to Novozymes Biopharma Sweden AB) as Tenant andi-parken i Lund AB as Landlord, St. Lars Vag 47, 220 09 Lund, Sweden (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to Repligen Corporation’s Transition Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.12#10.8*  Amendment No. 1 to Strategic Supplier Alliance Agreement, by and between GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB and Repligen Corporation, dated as of October 27, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Repligen Corporation’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.13#Strategic Supplier Alliance Agreement – Contract Manufacturing, by and between GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB and Repligen Sweden AB (as successor-in-interest to Novozymes Biopharma Sweden AB), dated as of July 7, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Repligen Corporation’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.14#Amendment to Strategic Supply Alliance Agreement, by and between GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB and Repligen Sweden AB (as successor-in-interest to Novozymes Biopharma Sweden AB), dated as of October 27, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.21 to Repligen Corporation’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.15*Repligen Corporation Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit  99.1 to Repligen Corporation’s FormS-8 filed on June 2, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.16*10.9*  Repligen CorporationNon-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Repligen Corporation’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 and incorporated by reference).
  10.17#10.10*  Asset Purchase Agreement, dated January 21, 2014, by and between Repligen Corporation and BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.18#Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 2, 2014, by and among Repligen Corporation, Refine Technology, LLC, Jerry Shevitz, certain members of Refine Technology, LLC, Refine Technology Sales LLC, and Refine Technology Sales Asia Pte. Ltd. (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Repligen Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.19Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated March 26, 2014, by and between Repligen Corporation and Centerpoint Acquisitions LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Repligen Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 and incorporated by reference herein).
  10.20*Letter Agreement, dated as of April 7, 2014, by and between Repligen Corporation and Tony J. Hunt (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).

Exhibit
Number

Document Description

  10.21*

Letter Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2014, by and between Repligen Corporation and Jon K.  Snodgres (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on

July 15, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).

  10.22*10.11*  Transitional Services and Separation Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2015, by and between Repligen Corporation and Walter C. Herlihy, Jr. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.23*Employment Agreement, dated as of February  26, 2015, by and between Repligen Corporation and Tony J. Hunt (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on Form8-K/A filed on March  2, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

Exhibit
Number

Document Description

  10.24*10.12* 

Repligen Corporation Amended and RestatedNon-Employee Directors’ Compensation Policy (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Repligen Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.13Form of Indemnification Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on May 12, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.14*Transitional Services and Separation Agreement, dated as of November  20, 2017, by and between Repligen Corporation and Howard Benjamin (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on November  22, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15Lease Agreement, dated February  6, 2018, by and between Repligen Corporation and U.S. REIF 111 Locke Drive Massachusetts, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Current Report on Form8-K filed on February  8, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.16*2018 Repligen Corporation Stock Option and Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Repligen Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.17*+Letter Agreement, dated as of September 3, 2016 by and between Repligen Corporation and Ralf Kuriyel.
10.18#Amendment No. 4 to Strategic Supplier Alliance Agreement, dated February 20, 2018, by and between Repligen Sweden AB and GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Repligen Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended

June 30, 2015 March 31, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference).

21.1+ Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1+ Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
24.1+ Power of Attorney (included on signature page).
31.1+ Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification.
31.2+ Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification.
32.1+ Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101 The following materials from Repligen Corporation on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2018, formatted in Extensive Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

 

#

Confidential treatment obtained as to certain portions.

*

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

+

Filed herewith.

The exhibits listed above are not contained in the copy of the Annual Report on Form10-K distributed to stockholders. Upon the request of any stockholder entitled to vote at the 20152019 annual meeting, the Registrant will furnish that person without charge a copy of any exhibits listed above. Requests should be addressed to Repligen Corporation, 41 Seyon Street, Waltham, MA 02453.

ITEM 16.

10-K SUMMARY

We may voluntarily include a summary of information required by Form10-K under this Item 16. We have elected not to include such summary information.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  REPLIGEN CORPORATION
Date: February 25, 2016March 1, 2019  By: 

/s/S/    TONY J. HUNT        

   

Tony J. Hunt

President and Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MENPERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby makes, constitutes and appoints Tony J. Hunt and Jon K. Snodgres with full power to act without the other, his true and lawfulattorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign any or all amendments to this Form10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto saidattorney-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that saidattorney-in-fact and agents of any of them, or any substitute or substitutes, lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

/s/S/    TONY J. HUNT

Tony J. Hunt

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal executive officer)

 February 25, 2016March 1, 2019

/s/S/    JON K. SNODGRES

Jon K. Snodgres

 

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal financial and accounting officer)

 February 25, 2016March 1, 2019

/s/S/    KAREN DAWES

Karen Dawes

 Chairperson of the Board February 25, 2016March 1, 2019

/s/    GLENNS/    NICOLAS L. CM. BOOPER        ARTHELEMY

Glenn L. Cooper, M.D.Nicolas M. Barthelemy

 Director February 25, 2016March 1, 2019

/s/    JOHNS/    GLENN G.L. COX        OOPER

John G. CoxGlenn L. Cooper, M.D.

 Director February 25, 2016March 1, 2019

/s/    ALFREDS/    JOHN L. GG. COLDBERG        OX

Alfred L. Goldberg, Ph.D.John G. Cox

 Director February 25, 2016March 1, 2019

/s/S/    GLENN P. MUIR

Glenn P. Muir

 Director February 25, 2016March 1, 2019

/s/S/    THOMAS F. RYAN, JR.

Thomas F. Ryan, Jr.

 Director February 25, 2016March 1, 2019

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

   Page 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   4954 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20152018 and December  31, 20142017

   5055 

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016

   5156 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016

   5257 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December  31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016

   5358 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   5459 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Repligen Corporation:

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Repligen Corporation (the Company) as of December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015. These2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)statements”). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Repligen Corporationthe Company at December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015,2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), Repligen Corporation’sthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of the Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 25, 2016March 1, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company‘s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company‘s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the US federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002

Boston, Massachusetts

February 25, 2016March 1, 2019

REPLIGEN CORPORATION

REPLIGEN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

 

(in thousands, except share data)  December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 
  December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 

Assets

      

Current assets:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $54,092   $35,363    $193,822  $173,759 

Marketable securities

   17,682    23,090  

Accounts receivable, less reserve for doubtful accounts of $31 and $41, respectively

   11,300    7,760  

Accounts receivables, less reserve for doubtful accounts of $227 and $58 at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively

   33,015  27,585 

Royalties and other receivables

   82    240     136  153 

Unbilled receivables

   2,602   —   

Inventories, net

   17,998    12,384     42,263  39,004 

Deferred tax asset, net

   —      5  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   2,098    2,104     3,901  2,281 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total current assets

   103,252    80,946     275,739  242,782 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   13,801    14,526     32,180  22,417 

Long-term marketable securities

   1,633    3,550  

Intangible assets, net

   12,755    14,636     135,438  144,753 

Goodwill

   14,346    14,185     326,735  327,333 

Restricted cash

   450    450  

Deferred tax assets

   4,355   —   

Other assets

   174  6,234 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total assets

  $146,237   $128,293    $774,621  $743,519 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

   

Current liabilities:

      

Accounts payable

  $6,724   $3,863    $10,489  $7,282 

Accrued liabilities

   12,057    6,819     15,865  17,929 

Convertible senior notes, current portion

   103,488   —   
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total current liabilities

   18,781    10,682     129,842  25,211 

Other long-term liabilities

   4,708    5,879  

Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)

   

Convertible senior notes, net

   —    99,250 

Deferred tax liabilities

   25,086  25,167 

Other liabilities, long-term

   4,125  2,343 
  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

   159,053  151,971 
  

 

  

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)

   

Stockholders’ equity:

      

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding

   —      —    

Common stock, $.01 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized, 32,949,353 shares at December 31, 2015 and 32,774,374 shares at December 31, 2014 issued and outstanding

   329    328  

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding

   —     —   

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 80,000,000 shares authorized; 43,917,378 shares at December 31, 2018 and 43,587,079 shares at December 31, 2017 issued and outstanding

   439  436 

Additional paid-in capital

   202,527    198,064     642,590  628,983 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (8,566  (5,773   (11,893 (6,363

Accumulated deficit

   (71,542  (80,887   (15,568 (31,508
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

   122,748    111,732     615,568  591,548 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $146,237   $128,293    $774,621  $743,519 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

REPLIGEN CORPORATION

REPLIGEN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

(in thousands, except share and per share data)  Years ended December 31, 
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015 2014 2013   2018 2017 2016 

Revenue:

        

Product revenue

  $83,537   $60,431   $47,482  

Products

  $193,891  $141,089  $104,441 

Royalty and other revenue

   —      3,117    20,687     141  147  100 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total revenue

   83,537    63,548    68,169     194,032  141,236  104,541 

Operating expenses:

    
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Costs and operating expenses:

    

Cost of product revenue

   35,251    28,022    22,481     86,531  67,050  47,117 

Cost of royalty and other revenue

   —      —      2,682  

Research and development

   5,740    5,609    7,341     15,821  8,672  7,355 

Selling, general and administrative

   24,699    17,154    12,701     65,692  51,509  30,853 

Contingent consideration – fair value adjustments

   4,083    2,072    91     —     —    3,242 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total operating expenses

   69,773    52,857    45,296  

Total costs and operating expenses

   168,044  127,231  88,567 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from operations

   13,764    10,691    22,873     25,988  14,005  15,974 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other income (expenses):

    

Investment income

   136    309    301     1,895  371  346 

Interest expense

   (32  (50  (50   (6,709 (6,441 (3,768

Other income (expense)

   (445  188    (110

Other income (expenses)

   262  (687 (860
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other expenses, net

   (4,552 (6,757 (4,282
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before income taxes

   13,423    11,138    23,014     21,436  7,248  11,692 

Income tax (benefit) provision

   4,078    2,968    6,921  

Income tax provision (benefit)

   4,819  (21,105 11 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income

  $9,345   $8,170   $16,093    $16,617  $28,353  $11,681 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings per share:

        

Basic

  $0.28   $0.25   $0.51    $0.38  $0.74  $0.35 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

  $0.28   $0.25   $0.50    $0.37  $0.72  $0.34 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

    

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

    

Basic

   32,881,940    32,497,657    31,667,015     43,767  38,234  33,573 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

   33,577,091    33,263,667    32,406,641     45,471  39,150  34,099 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other comprehensive income:

    

Unrealized (loss) gain on investments

   22    (28  (19

Foreign currency translation (loss) gain

   (2,815  (7,743  106  

Net income

  $16,617  $28,353  $11,681 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

    

Foreign currency translation adjustment

   (5,530 7,381  (5,189

Unrealized gain on marketable securities

   —    5  6 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Comprehensive income

  $6,552   $399   $16,180    $11,087  $35,739  $6,498 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

REPLIGEN CORPORATION

REPLIGEN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

 

(in thousands, except share data) Common Stock  Additional
Paid-in Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Stockholders’
Equity
 
 Number of
Shares
  Amount     

Balance, December 31, 2012

  31,195,041   $312   $187,051   $1,911   $(105,150 $84,124  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

      16,093    16,093  

Unrealized loss on investments

     (19   (19

Foreign currency translation adjustment

     106     106  

Share-based compensation expense

    1,060      1,060  

Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock

  730,700    7    2,515      2,522  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

  31,925,741   $319   $190,626   $1,998   $(89,057 $103,886  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

      8,170    8,170  

Unrealized loss on investments

     (28   (28

Foreign currency translation adjustment

     (7,743   (7,743

Share-based compensation expense

    1,766      1,766  

Shares issued in acquisition

  215,285    2    3,998      4,000  

Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock

  633,348    7    1,674      1,681  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

  32,774,374   $328   $198,064   $(5,773 $(80,887 $111,732  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

      9,345    9,345  

Unrealized gain on investments

     22     22  

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net

     (2,815   (2,815

Share-based compensation expense

    3,598      3,598  

Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock

  174,979    1    865      866  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2015

  32,949,353   $329   $202,527   $(8,566 $(71,542 $122,748  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-In Capital
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 
  Number of
Shares
  Par
Value
 

Balance at December 31, 2015

  32,949,353  $329  $202,527  $(8,566 $(71,542 $122,748 

Net income

  —     —     —     —     11,681   11,681 

Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock

  321,218   4   1,837   —     —     1,841 

Unrealized gain on investments

  —     —     —     6   —     6 

Issuance of common stock pursuant to the Atoll GmbH acquisition

  538,700   5   14,130   —     —     14,135 

Payment of contingent consideration in stock

  34,803   —     875   —     —     875 

Conversion option of convertible notes, net of issuance costs of $639

  —     —     18,072   —     —     18,072 

Stock-based compensation expense

  —     —     4,595   —     —     4,595 

Translation adjustment

  —     —     —     (5,189  —     (5,189
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

  33,844,074   338   242,036   (13,749  (59,861  168,764 

Net income

  —     —     —     —     28,353   28,353 

Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock

  330,185   3   2,348   —     —     2,351 

Unrealized gain on investments

  —     —     —     5   —     5 

Issuance of commons stock pursuant to the acquisition of Spectrum Lifesciences, LLC

  6,153,995   62   247,513   —     —     247,575 

Payment of contingent consideration in stock

  30,756   1   1,062   —     —     1,063 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs of $8,691

  3,228,069   32   129,277   —     —     129,309 

Stock-based compensation expense

  —     —     6,747   —     —     6,747 

Translation adjustment

  —     —     —     7,381   —     7,381 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

  43,587,079   436   628,983   (6,363  (31,508  591,548 

Net income

  —     —     —     —     16,617   16,617 

Issuance of common stock for debt conversion

  2   0   0   —     —     0 

Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock

  330,297   3   3,415   —     —     3,418 

Stock-based compensation expense

  —     —     10,192   —     —     10,192 

Cumulative effect of accounting changes

  —     —     —     —     (677  (677

Translation adjustment

  —     —     —     (5,530  —     (5,530
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2018

  43,917,378  $439  $642,590  $(11,893 $(15,568 $615,568 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

REPLIGEN CORPORATION

REPLIGEN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in thousands)

 

(In thousands)  Years ended December 31, 
  For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
  2015 2014 2013   2018 2017 2016 

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Net income:

  $9,345   $8,170   $16,093  

Net income

  $16,617  $28,353  $11,681 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

        

Depreciation and amortization

   4,594    4,020    3,114     15,778  10,507  5,334 

Non-cash interest expense

   4,248  3,977  2,274 

Stock-based compensation expense

   3,598    1,766    1,060     10,192  6,747  4,595 

Deferred tax expense (benefit)

   (118  295    2,788  

Deferred tax expense

   71  (24,679 (4,092

Loss on revaluation of contingent consideration

   4,083    2,072    91     —     —    3,242 

Loss on disposal of assets

   1    35    2  

Changes in assets and liabilities:

    

Other

   (3 64  (8

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding impact of acquisitions:

    

Accounts receivable

   (3,729  (1,597  (774   (6,101 (6,888 (3,222

Royalties and other receivables

   158    6,557    2,400     7  644  (652

Unbilled receivables

   (2,602  —     —   

Inventories

   (6,149  (860  (626   (4,042 605  (6,163

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   (277  (820  58  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

   (1,769 (1,304 612 

Accounts payable

   3,024    2,288    (734   2,266  807  (1,802

Accrued liabilities

   (1,592  (2,489  1,257  

Accrued expenses

   (1,398 (1,993 (4,038

Long-term liabilities

   2,115    (1,036  1,201     (494 611  (240
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   15,053    18,401    25,930  

Total cash provided by operating activities

   32,770  17,451  7,521 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Purchases of marketable securities

   (20,168  (27,508  (42,480   —    (47 (23,700

Redemptions of marketable securities

   27,587    34,804    29,209  

Acquisition of assets of Refine Technology, LLC

   —      (21,236  —    

Increase of restricted cash

   —      (250  —    

Redemption of marketable securities

   —    19,600  23,400 

Additions to capitalized software costs

   (2,147  —     —   

Developed technology intangible asset payment

   (1,255  —     —   

Acquisition of Spectrum Lifesciences, Inc., net of cash acquired

   —    (112,795  —   

Acquisition of Atoll GmbH, net of cash acquired

   —     —    (8,767

Acquisition of TangenX Technology Corporation, net of cash acquired

   —     —    (35,847

Proceeds from sale of fixed asset

   —     —    45 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

   (2,628  (5,602  (4,635   (10,635 (5,454 (4,325
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   4,791    (19,792  (17,906

Total cash used in investing activities

   (14,037 (98,696 (49,194
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

Proceeds from issuance of senior convertible notes, net of issuance costs

   —     —    111,070 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

   —    129,309   —   

Exercise of stock options

   866    1,680    2,450     3,418  2,351  1,841 

Excess tax benefit on exercise of stock options

   —      —      72  

Repayment of senior convertible notes

   (11  —     —   

Payments of contingent consideration

   (99  —      —       —    (1,715 (798
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

   767    1,680    2,522  

Total cash provided by financing activities

   3,407  129,945  112,113 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

   (1,882  (4,756  74  

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

   (2,077 2,376  (2,299
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   18,729    (4,467  10,620  

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

   35,363    39,830    29,210  

Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

   20,063  51,076  68,141 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

  $54,092   $35,363   $39,830  

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period

   173,759  122,683  54,542 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Supplemental information:

    

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period

  $193,822  $173,759  $122,683 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

    

Income taxes paid

  $4,948   $2,547   $1,264    $4,046  $4,021  $3,993 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  Years ended December 31, 
  2015 2014 2013 

Interest paid

  $2,444  $2,444  $1,222 

Supplemental disclosure ofnon-cash investing and financing activities:

    

Non-cash effect of adoption of ASU2016-16

  $5,609  $—    $—   

Payment of contingent consideration in common stock

  $—    $1,063  $875 

Common stock tendered for acquisition of Spectrum, Inc.

  $—    $247,575  $—   

Common stock tendered for acquisition of Atoll GmbH

  $—    $—    $14,135 

Property, plant and equipment related to lease incentives

  $2,270  $—    $—   

Business Acquisitions:

        

Fair value of tangible assets acquired

   —      1,175    —      $—    $19,709  $1,420 

Fair value of accounts receivable

   —      1,647    —       —    5,075  1,267 

Fair value of other assets

   —      184    —       —    1,718  183 

Liabilities assumed

   —      (365  —       —    (7,698 (3,662

Fair value of stock issued

   —      (4,000  —       —    (247,575 (14,135

Cost in excess of fair value of assets acquired (Goodwill)

   —      13,199    —       —    265,519  46,505 

Acquired identifiable intangible assets

   —      9,100    —       —    120,080  19,829 

In-process research and development

   —      1,600    —    

Deferred tax liabilities, net

   —    (43,608 (5,841
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 
   —      22,540    —       —    113,220  45,566 

Less accrued contingent consideration

   —      (1,370  —       —     —    (952

Working capital adjustment, reflected in other receivables as of December 31, 2014

   —      66    —    

Less working capital adjustment

   —    (425  —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash paid for business acquisition

   —      21,236    —    

Net cash paid for business acquisitions

  $—    $112,795  $44,614 
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

REPLIGEN CORPORATION

REPLIGEN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.

Organization and Nature of Business

Repligen Corporation (“Repligen” or the “Company”)(NASDAQ:RGEN) is a bioprocessing company that develops, manufacturesfocused on the development, manufacture and marketscommercialization of highly innovative products and solutions used to manufacture biologic drugs. improve the interconnected phases of the biological drug manufacturing process. The Company’s portfolio includes protein products (Protein A affinity ligands, cell culture growth factors), chromatography products (OPUSpre-packed columns, chromatography resins, ELISA kits), and filtration products (XCell ATF Systems, SIUS TFF cassettes, KrosFlo filters, modules and systems). The Company’s bioprocessing products are sold to major life sciences companies, biopharmaceutical development companies and contract manufacturing organizations worldwide. The Protein A ligands and growth factor products that the Company manufactures are components of chromatography resins and cell culture media, respectively.

The Company is a world-leadingthe leading manufacturer of both native and recombinant forms of Protein A ligands, a critical reagentscomponent of Protein A resins that are the industry standard for downstream separation and purification of monoclonal antibody-based therapeutics. The Company’s growth factors are used in biomanufacturingupstream processes to separateaccelerate cell growth and purify monoclonal antibodies,productivity in a type of biologic drug. Repligen also supplies several growth factor products, ATF System products and cell filtration products used to increase cell culture productivity during the bioproduction process. In the expanding area of flexible biomanufacturing technologies, the Company has developed and markets a seriesbioreactor. The Company’s innovative line of OPUS chromatography columns, used in downstream processes for usebench-scale through clinical-scale purification needs, are deliveredpre-packed with its customers’ choice of resin and volume. The Company’s XCell ATF Systems, available in clinical-scale manufacturing. The Company generally manufacturesstainless steel and sells Protein Asingle-use configurations, continuously eliminate waste from a bioreactor, to accelerate and growth factors to life sciences companies under long-term supply agreementsincrease productivity in upstream processes.Single-use SIUS TFF cassettes and sells its chromatography columns, as well as mediahardware are used for biologic drug concentration in downstream processes. KrosFlo filters and quality test kits, and ATF products directly to biopharmaceutical companies or contract manufacturing organizations or through distributors. The Company manufactures its products in production facilitiessystems are used in the United Statesfiltration, isolation, purification and Sweden.

In addition, the Company has out-licensed certain intellectual property to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, from which Repligen received royalties on Bristol’s net salesconcentration of biologics. Repligen’s corporate headquarters are in the United States of their product Orencia®. On April 7, 2008, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with BristolWaltham, Massachusetts (USA) and its manufacturing facilities are located in connection with a patent infringement lawsuit that Repligen filed against Bristol. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Bristol was obligated to pay us royalties on its U.S. net sales of Orencia® for any clinical indication at a rate of 1.8% for the first $500,000,000 of annual sales, 2.0% for the next $500,000,000 of annual salesWaltham, Massachusetts; Shrewsbury, Massachusetts (until June 2019); Marlborough, Massachusetts, Rancho Dominguez, California; Houston, Texas; Irving, Texas; Lund, Sweden; and 4% of annual sales in excess of $1 billion. Under the terms of the agreement, royalty payments on Bristol’s sales of Orencia® ceased as of December 31, 2013.Weingarten, Germany.

The Company is subject to a number of risks typically associated with companies in the biotechnology industry. These risks principally include the Company’s dependence on key customers, development by the Company or its competitors of new technological innovations, dependence on key personnel, protection of proprietary technology, compliance with the FDA and other governmental regulations and approval requirements, as well as the ability to grow the Company’s business and obtain adequate funding to finance this growth.

 

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

Significant estimates and assumptions by management affect the Company’s revenue recognition for multiple element arrangements, allowance for doubtful accounts, the net realizable value of inventory, estimated fair value of cost method investments, valuations and purchase price allocations related to business combinations, expected future cash flows including growth rates, discount rates, terminal values and other assumptions and estimates used to evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets, estimated fair values of intangible assets and goodwill, amortization methods and periods, warranty reserves, certain accrued expenses, stock-based compensation, fair value estimates of contingent consideration, contingent liabilities, tax reserves and recoverability of the Company’s net deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance.

Although the Company regularly assesses these estimates, actual results could differ materially from these estimates. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. The Company bases its

estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances.

Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Repligen Sweden AB, Repligen GmbH, Spectrum LifeSciences LLC and its subsidiaries (“Spectrum,” acquired on August 1, 2017) and Repligen Singapore Pte. Ltd. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year balances have changed to reflect current year presentation.

Foreign Currency

The Company translates the assets and liabilities of its foreign subsidiary at rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Revenues and expenses are translated at average rates in effect during the reporting period. Translation adjustments, including adjustments related to the Company’s intercompany loan with Repligen Sweden AB and Repligen Sweden AB’s intercompany loan with Repligen GmbH, are remeasured at each period end and included in accumulated other comprehensive income.

Revenue Recognition

Product Sales

The Company’sWe generate revenue recognition policy is to recognize revenues from product sales and services in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. These standards require that revenues are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, product delivery, including customer acceptance, has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of whether these criteria have been met are based on management’s judgments primarily regarding the fixed nature of the fee charged for the product delivered and the collectability of those fees. The Company has a few longstanding customers who comprise the majority of revenue and have excellent payment histories and therefore the Company does not require collateral. The Company has had no significant write-offs of uncollectible invoices in the periods presented. When more than one element such as equipment, consumables, and services are contained in a single arrangement, the Company allocates revenue between the elements based on each element’s relative selling price, provided that each element meets the criteria for treatment as a separate unit of accounting. An item is considered a separate unit of accounting if it has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. The selling price of the undelivered elements is determined by the price charged when the element is sold separately, or in cases when the item is not sold separately, by third-party evidence of selling price or management’s best estimate of selling price.

The Company’s product revenues are from the sale of bioprocessing products, equipment devices, and related consumables used with these equipment devices to customers in the life science and biopharmaceutical industries. On product sales to end customers, Under ASC 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,”revenue is recognized netwhen, or as, obligations under the terms of discounts,a contract are satisfied, which occurs when bothcontrol of the titlepromised products or services is transferred to customers. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring products or services to a customer (“transaction price”). To the extent the transaction price includes variable consideration, the Company estimates the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price utilizing the expected value method or the most likely amount method, depending on the facts and riskcircumstances relative to the contract. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price if, in the Company’s judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of loss have transferredcumulative revenue under the contract will not occur. Estimates of variable consideration and determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based largely on an assessment of the Company’s anticipated performance and all information (historical, current and forecasted) that is reasonably available. Sales, value add, and other taxes collected on behalf of third parties are excluded from revenue.

When determining the transaction price of a contract, an adjustment is made if payment from a customer occurs either significantly before or significantly after performance, resulting in a significant financing component. Applying the practical expedient in paragraph606-10-32-18, the Company does not assess whether a significant financing component exists if the period between when the Company performs its obligations under the contract and when the customer pays is one year or less. None of the Company’s contracts contained a significant financing component as of December 31, 2018.

Contracts with customers may contain multiple performance obligations. For such arrangements, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the estimated relative standalone selling prices of the promised products or services underlying each performance obligation. The Company determines standalone selling prices based on the price at which the performance obligation is sold separately. If the standalone selling price is not observable through past transactions, the Company estimates the standalone selling price taking into account available information such as market conditions and internally approved pricing guidelines related to the performance obligations.

The Company recognizes product revenue under the terms of each customer agreement upon transfer of control to the customer, as determined by the shipping terms provided there are no uncertainties regarding acceptance, and all obligations have been completed. Generally, our product arrangements for equipment sales are multiple element arrangements, and may include services, such as installation and training, and multiple products, such as consumables and spare parts. In accordance with ASC 605-25, based on terms and conditions of the product arrangements, the Company believes that these services and undelivered products can be accounted for separately from the delivered product element as the delivered products have value to our customers onwhich occurs at a standalone basis. Accordingly, revenue for services not yet performed at the time of product shipment are deferred and recognized as such services are performed. The relative selling price of any undelivered products is also deferred at the time of shipment and recognized as revenue when these products are delivered. For product sales to distributors, the Company recognizes revenue for both equipment and consumables upon delivery to the distributor unless direct shipment to the end user is requested. In this case, revenue is recognized upon delivery to the end user’s location. In general, distributors are responsible for shipment to the end customer along with installation, training and acceptance of the equipment by the end customer. Sales to distributors are not contingent upon resale of the product.point in time.

At the time of sale, the Company also evaluates the need to accrue for warranty and sales returns. The supply agreements the Company has with its customers and the related purchase orders identify the terms and

conditions of each sale and the price of the goods ordered. Due to the nature of the sales arrangements, inventory produced for sale is tested for quality specifications prior to shipment. Since the product is manufactured to order and in compliance with required specifications prior to shipment, the likelihood of sales return, warranty or other issues is largely diminished. Furthermore, there is no customer right of return in our sales agreements. Sales returns and warranty issues are infrequent and have not had a material impact on the Company’s financial statements historically.

Shipping and handling fees are recorded as a component of product revenue, with the associated costs recorded as a component of cost of product revenue.

The Scripps Research Institute

On April 6, 2007, the Company entered into an exclusive worldwide commercial license agreement (“Scripps License Agreement”) with The Scripps Research Institute (“Scripps”). Pursuant to the License Agreement, the Company obtained a license to use, commercialize and sublicense certain patented technology and improvements thereon, owned or licensed by Scripps, relating to compounds that may have utility in treating Friedreich’s ataxia, an inherited neurodegenerative disease.

Pursuant to the Scripps License Agreement, the Company agreed to pay Scripps an initial license fee of $300,000, certain royalty and sublicense fees and, in the event that the Company achieved specified developmental and commercial milestones, certain additional milestone payments. Total future milestone payments, if all milestones had been achieved, would have been approximately $4,300,000. In addition, the Company issued Scripps and certain of its designees 87,464 shares of the Company’s common stock, which had a value of $300,000 on the date of issuance.

In connection with the Scripps License Agreement, the Company issued warrants to an individual at Scripps to purchase up to 150,000 shares of common stock. No expense has been recorded related to these warrants through December 31, 2014. During the year ending December 31, 2014, the warrant’s seven-year term expired.

As of January 2014, all rights and obligations have been transferred to BioMarin.

Sale of Intellectual Property to BioMarin

In January 2014, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (“BioMarin”) to sell Repligen’s histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) portfolio. Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company received $2 million from BioMarin as an upfront payment on January 30, 2014 and a $125,675 payment on September 3, 2014 upon completion of the Technology Transfer. The Company is entitled to receive up to $160 million in potential future milestone payments for the development, regulatory approval and commercial sale of portfolio compounds included in the agreement. These potential milestone payments are approximately 37% related to clinical development and 63% related to initial commercial sales in specific geographies. In addition, Repligen is eligible to receive royalties on sales of therapeutic products originating from the HDACi portfolio. The royalty rates are tiered and begin in the mid-single-digits for the first HDACi portfolio product and for the first non-HDACi portfolio product with lesser amounts for any backup products developed under the Asset Purchase Agreement. Repligen’s receipt of these royalties is subject to customary offsets and deductions. There are no refund provisions in this agreement. The Company recognized $2.1 million of revenue in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 related to the transfer of the HDACi technology under the Asset Purchase Agreement. Any milestones earned upon specified clinical development or commercial sales events or future royalty payments, under the Asset Purchase Agreement will be recognized as revenue when they are earned.

Activities under this agreement were evaluated in accordance with ASC 605-25 to determine if they represented a multiple element revenue arrangement. The Company identified the following deliverables in the BioMarin agreement:

The assignment by Repligen to BioMarin of the Repligen Technology (“Repligen Know-How” and “Repligen Patents”) and the Scripps Agreement (the “Transferred Assets”);

The transfer of certain notebooks, data, documents, biological materials (if any) and other such documents in our possession that might be useful to further development of the program (the “Technology Transfer”).

Two criteria must be met in order for a deliverable to be considered a separate unit of accounting. The first criterion requires that the delivered item or items have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. The second criterion, which relates to evaluating a general right of return, is not applicable because such a provision does not exist in the Asset Purchase Agreement. The deliverables outlined above were deemed to have stand-alone value and to meet the criteria to be accounted for as separate units of accounting. Factors considered in this determination included, among other things, BioMarin’s right under the agreement to assign the Transferred Assets, whether any other vendors sell the items separately and if BioMarin could use the delivered item for its intended purpose without the receipt of the remaining deliverables. If multiple deliverables included in an arrangement are separable into different units of accounting, the multiple-element arrangements guidance addresses how to allocate the arrangement consideration to those units of accounting. The amount of allocable arrangement consideration is limited to amounts that are fixed or determinable. Arrangement consideration is allocated at the inception of the arrangement to the identified units of accounting based on their relative selling price.

The Company identified the arrangement consideration to allocate among the units of accounting as the $2.0 million non-refundable up-front payment and the $125,675 payment to be received upon completion of the Technology Transfer. The Company excluded the potential milestone payments provided for in the Asset Purchase Agreement from the arrangement consideration as they were not considered fixed or determinable at the time the Asset Purchase Agreement was signed. Because Repligen had not sold these items on a standalone basis previously, Repligen had no vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price. Furthermore, Repligen did not have detailed third-party evidence of selling price, and as a result we used our best estimate of selling price for each item. In determining these prices, Repligen considered what Repligen would be willing to sell the items for on a standalone basis, what the market would bear for such items and what another party might charge for these items.

The up-front arrangement consideration allocated to the Transferred Assets was recognized upon execution of the Asset Purchase Agreement as the risks and rewards associated with the Transferred Assets transferred at that time. The Company used a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the value of the Transferred Assets. Key assumptions in the analysis included: the estimated market size for a compound targeted at Friedreich’s ataxia, the estimated remaining costs of development and time to commercialization, and the probability of successfully developing and commercializing the program. Based on this analysis, the Company allocated $2,115,000 to the value of the Transferred Assets. However, as the recognized revenue is limited to the non-contingent consideration received, the Company recognized $2,000,000, the amount of the up-front payment, as revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2014.

The estimated selling price of the Technology Transfer items was approximately $300,000 resulting in consideration allocation of approximately $11,000. However, as this item was not delivered prior to March 31, 2014, the Company did not recognize any revenue related to the Technology Transfer in the three months ended March 31, 2014. Repligen received the payment and recognized $125,675 of other revenues in September 2014 upon completion of the Technology Transfer.

The Company believes that a change in the key assumptions used to determine best estimate of selling price for each of the deliverables would not have a significant effect on the allocation of arrangement consideration.

In addition to the $2.1 million up-front payment, the Company is also eligible to receive up to $160 million in potential milestone payments from BioMarin comprised of:

Up to $60 million related to the achievement of specified clinical and regulatory milestone events; and

Up to $100 million related to the achievement of specified commercial sales events, specifically the first commercial sale in specific territories.

The Company evaluated the potential milestones in accordance with ASC 605-28, which allows an entity to make an accounting policy election to recognize a payment that is contingent upon the achievement of a substantive milestone in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved. This evaluation included an assessment of the risks that must be overcome to achieve the respective milestone as well as whether the achievement of the milestone was due in part to our initial clinical work, the level of effort and investment required to achieve the respective milestone and whether the milestone consideration is reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement. There is considerable judgment involved in determining whether a milestone satisfies all of the criteria required to conclude that a milestone is substantive. Milestones that are not considered substantive are recognized as earned if there are no remaining performance obligations or over the remaining period of performance, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met.

The Company believes that the $60 million of specified clinical and regulatory milestone payments are substantive. Therefore, any such milestones achieved will be recognized as revenue when earned.

Any milestones achieved upon specified commercial sales events or future royalty payments are considered contingent revenue under the Asset Purchase Agreement, and will be recognized as revenue when they are earned as there are no undelivered elements remaining and no continuing performance obligations under the arrangement.

Sale of SecreFlo

On December 23, 2014, the Company sold its synthetic human secretin line, SecreFlo, to Innovate Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., or Innovate, pursuant to an asset purchase agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, Repligen received a nominal upfront payment and is eligible to receive royalties on net sales of qualified products for a period beginning on the first commercial sale of such product through the earlier of the expiration of the regulatory exclusivity period for the product or 10 years from its first commercial sale.

Pfizer License Agreement

In December 2012, the Company entered into an exclusive worldwide licensing agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”) to advance the spinal muscular atrophy program, or SMA program. Pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement, the Company received $5 million from Pfizer as an upfront payment on January 22, 2013, a $1 million milestone payment on September 4, 2013 and a $1 million milestone payment on December 28, 2014. On January 26, 2015 Pfizer notified the Company that they were terminating the License Agreement for convenience, effective as of April 26, 2015. The Company does not intend to invest additional resources to the development of the SMA program.

Orencia Royalty

In April 2008, the Company settled its outstanding litigation with Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (“Bristol”) and began recognizing royalty revenue in fiscal year 2009 for Bristol’s net sales in the United States of Orencia® which is used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The royalty agreement with Bristol provided that the Company would receive such royalty payments on sales of Orencia® by Bristol through December 31, 2013. Pursuant to the settlement with Bristol (“Bristol Settlement”), the Company recognized royalty revenue of approximately $17,881,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Revenue earned from Bristol royalties

was recorded in the periods when it was earned based on royalty reports sent by Bristol to the Company. These royalty payments have ceased as of December 31, 2013, and the Company has no continuing obligations to Bristol as a result of this settlement.

Pursuant to the Bristol Settlement, Repligen remitted to the University of Michigan 15% of all royalty revenue received from Bristol. Royalty expense for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 was approximately $2,682,000. This operating expense was included in cost of royalty revenue in the Company’s statements of comprehensive income.

Therapeutics Licensing Agreements

Activities under licensing agreements are evaluated in accordance with ASC 605-25 to determine if they represent a multiple element revenue arrangement. The Company identifies the deliverables included within the agreement and evaluates which deliverables represent separate units of accounting. The Company accounts for those components as separate units of accounting if the following two criteria are met:

The delivered item or items have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis.

If there is a general right of return relative to the delivered items, delivery or performance of the undelivered items is considered probable and within our control.

Factors considered in this determination include, among other things, whether any other vendors sell the items separately and if the licensee could use the delivered item for its intended purpose without the receipt of the remaining deliverables. If multiple deliverables included in an arrangement are separable into different units of accounting, the Company allocates the arrangement consideration to those units of accounting. The amount of allocable arrangement consideration is limited to amounts that are fixed or determinable. Arrangement consideration is allocated at the inception of the arrangement to the identified units of accounting based on their relative selling price. Revenue is recognized for each unit of accounting when the appropriate revenue recognition criteria are met.

Future milestone payments, if any, under a license agreement will be recognized under the provisions of ASC 605-28, which the Company adopted on January 1, 2011. The Company has elected to recognize a payment that is contingent upon the achievement of a substantive milestone in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved. A milestone is substantive if:

It can only be achieved based in whole or in part on either (1) the Company’s performance or (2) on the occurrence of a specific outcome resulting from the Company’s performance;

There is substantive uncertainty at the date an arrangement is entered into that the event will be achieved; and

It would result in additional payments being due to the entity.

The commercial milestone payments and royalty payments received under license agreements, if any, will be recognized as revenue when they are earned.

Research and Development Agreements

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized $803,000 of revenue, respectively, from sponsored research and development projects under agreements with the National Institutes of Health / Scripps Research Institute, the Muscular Dystrophy Association, Go Friedreich’s Ataxia Research, the European Friedrich’s Ataxia Consortium for Translational Studies, and the Friedreich’s Ataxia Research Alliance. The Company did not recognize any such revenue in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Research revenue is recognized when the expense has been incurred and services have been performed. Determination of which costs incurred qualify for reimbursement under the terms of the Company’s contractual agreements and the timing of when such costs were incurred involves the judgment of management. The Company’s calculations are based upon the agreed-upon terms as stated in the arrangements. However, should the estimated calculations change or be challenged by other parties to the agreements, research revenue may be adjusted in subsequent periods. The calculations have not historically changed or been challenged and the Company does not anticipate any subsequent change in its revenue related to sponsored research and development projects.

There have been no material changes to the Company’s initial estimates related to revenue recognition in any periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Risks and Uncertainties

The Company evaluates its operations periodically to determine if any risks and uncertainties exist that could impact its operations in the near term. The Company does not believe that there are any significant risks which have not already been disclosed in the consolidated financial statements. A loss of certain suppliers could temporarily disrupt operations, although alternate sources of supply exist for these items. The Company has mitigated these risks by working closely with key suppliers, identifying alternate sources and developing contingency plans.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Marketable Securities

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and on deposit and highly liquid investments in money market mutual funds. All cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Restricted cash represents cash that is restricted as to withdrawal or usage. In 2011, the Company issued a letter of credit in lieu of a security deposit for its leased facility in Waltham, Massachusetts, which was collateralized by a certificate of deposit held by the bank that issued the letter of credit. This certificate of deposit was classified as restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2016, the letter of credit was $0.5 million, the balance of restricted cash as of December 31, 2016. During 2017, the issuing bank no longer required collateral to secure the letter of credit. As a result, the Company released the funds from restricted cash.

We adopted ASU2016-18,“Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash,”on January 1, 2018, which changed the presentation of our consolidated statements of cash flows and related disclosures for all periods presented. Accordingly, the following is a summary of our cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash total as presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2018   2017   2016 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $193,822   $173,759   $122,233 

Restricted cash

   —      —      450 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

  $193,822   $173,759   $122,683 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

At December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014,2016, the Company’s investments included money market funds as well asand short-term and long-term marketable securities. There were no such investments as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. Short-term marketable securities are investments with original maturities of greater than 90 days. Long-term marketable securities are securities with maturities of greater than one year at the original date of purchase. The average remaining contractual maturity of marketable securities at December 31, 2015 is approximately 5.8 months.

Investments in debt securities consisted of the following at December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

   December 31, 2015 
   Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gain
   Gross
Unrealized
Loss
  Fair
Value
 

Marketable securities:

       

U.S. Government and agency securities

  $7,029    $—      $(6 $7,023  

Corporate and other debt securities

   10,659     7     (7  10,659  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
   17,688     7     (13  17,682  

Long-term marketable securities:

       

U.S. Government and agency securities

   838     —       (2  836  

Corporate and other debt securities

   800     —       (3  797  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
   1,638     —       (5  1,633  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $19,326    $7    $(18 $19,315  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

At December 31, 2015, the Company’s investments included thirty-four debt securities in unrealized loss positions with a total unrealized loss of approximately $19,000 and a total fair market value of approximately $12,520,000. All investments with gross unrealized losses have been in unrealized loss positions for less than 12 months. The unrealized losses were caused primarily by current economic and market conditions. There was no change in the credit risk of the securities. The Company does not intend to sell any investments in an unrealized loss position, and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases. There were no realized gains or losses on the investments for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.

2016.

Investments in debt securities consisted of the following at December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

   December 31, 2014 
   Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gain
   Gross
Unrealized
Loss
  Fair Value 

Marketable securities:

       

U.S. Government and agency securities

  $12,716    $2    $(2 $12,716  

Corporate and other debt securities

   10,373     4     (3  10,374  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
   23,089     6     (5  23,090  

Long-term marketable securities:

       

U.S. Government and agency securities

   1,228     —       —      1,228  

Corporate and other debt securities

   2,326     —       (4  2,322  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
   3,554     —       (4  3,550  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $26,643    $6    $(9 $26,640  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

The contractual maturities of debt securities at December 31, 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

   Amortized
Cost
   Fair Value 

Due in 1 year or less

  $17,688    $17,682  

Due in 1 to 2 years

   1,638     1,633  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $19,326    $19,315  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurement

In determining the fair value of its assets and liabilities, the Company uses various valuation approaches. The Company employs a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and

are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The fair value hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the source of inputs as follows:

 

Level 1

 –  

 Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

Level 2

 –  

 Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and models for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3

 –  

 Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

The availability of observable inputs can vary among the various types of financial assets and liabilities. To the extent that the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for financial statement disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the overall fair value measurement.

The Company’s fixed income investments are comprised of obligations of U.S. government agencies, corporate debt securities and other interest bearing securities. These investments have been initially valued at the transaction price and subsequently valued, at the end of each reporting period, utilizing third party pricing services or other market observable data. The pricing services utilize industry standard valuation models, including both income and market based approaches and observable market inputs to determine value. These observable market inputs include reportable trades, benchmark yields, credit spreads, broker/dealer quotes, bids, offers, current spot rates and other industry and economic events. The Company validates the prices provided by third party pricing services by reviewing their pricing methods and matrices, obtaining market values from other pricing sources, analyzing pricing data in certain instances and confirming that the relevant markets are active. After completing its validation procedures, the Company did not adjust or override any fair value measurements provided by the pricing services asAs of December 31, 2015.

The following fair value hierarchy table presents information about each major category of the Company’s assets measured at fair value2018, cash and cash equivalents on our consolidated balance sheet includes $126.6 million in a money market account. These funds are valued on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands):using Level 1 inputs.

   Fair value measurement at reporting date using: 
   Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
   Significant
other observable
inputs
(Level 2)
   Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
   Total 

Assets:

        

Money market funds

  $12,685    $—      $—      $12,685  

U.S. Government and agency securities

   7,456     402     —       7,858  

Corporate and other debt securities

   —       11,457     —       11,457  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $20,141    $11,859    $—      $32,000  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities:

        

Contingent consideration – short-term

   —       —       4,480     4,480  

Contingent consideration – long-term

   —       —       2,308     2,308  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $—      $—      $6,788    $6,788  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2015,2018 and 2017, the Company hashad no other assets or liabilities for which fair value measurement is either required or has been elected to be applied, other thanapplied.

In May 2016, the liabilities for contingent consideration recorded in connection with the acquisitionCompany issued $115.0 million aggregate principal amount of the assetsNotes due June 1, 2021. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of BioFlash Partners, LLC (“BioFlash”) andeach year, beginning on December 1, 2016. As of December 31, 2018, the Refine Acquisition. The contingent consideration related to BioFlash is valued using management’s estimates of royalties to be paid to the former shareholders of BioFlash based on salescarrying value of the acquired assets. The contingent consideration related to the Refine Acquisition is valued using management’s estimatesNotes was $103.5 million, net of expected future milestone payments based on forecasted sales of the acquired assetsunamortized discount, and portion of any receipts that might be received in connection with the resolution, withdrawal or settlement of certain patent disputes with a third party to be paid to the former shareholders of Refine. These valuations are Level 3 valuations as the primary inputs are unobservable.

The following tables provide quantitative information associated with the fair value measurement of the Company’s contingent consideration related to Refine using Level 3 inputs (in thousands):

Contingent Consideration
Refine

Fair value as of December 31, 2015

$ 6,369

Valuation technique

Probability-adjusted

discounted cash flow

Periods in which milestones can be achieved

2015 – 2016

    Fixed
Earn-out
   Variable
Earn-out
   Accrued
Balance
 

2015

  $3,500     850    $4,350  

2016

   4,250     1,300     2,019  

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of Refine’s contingent consideration are the probabilities of successful achievement of sales milestones. Significant increases or decreases in estimated Refine sales would result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement, respectively.

Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration in fiscal 2015 are primarily attributable to an increase to the expected Refine milestone payment of $4,048,000 related to 2015 sales and forecasted 2016 sales, a $1,000,000 milestone payment made to Refine related to 2014 sales, a $110,000 minimum royalty payment made to BioFlash, and a final milestone payment made to Novozymes Biopharma DK A/S of 25,000 Euros (approximately $29,000). All milestone payments made in 2015 were previously accrued. The following table provides a rollforward of the fair value of the contingent consideration (in thousands):Notes was $184.6 million. The fair value of the Notes is a Level 1 valuation and was determined based on the most recent trade activity of the Notes as of December 31, 2018. The Notes are discussed in more detail in Note 10,“Convertible Senior Notes”to these consolidated financial statements

Balance at December 31, 2014

  $3,844  

Payments

   (1,139

Changes in fair value

   4,083  
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

  $6,788  
  

 

 

 

There were no remeasurements to fair value during the year ended December 31, 20152018 of financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Inventories

Inventories relate to the Company’s bioprocessing business. The Company values inventory at cost or, if lower, fair marketnet realizable value, using thefirst-in,first-out method. The Company reviews its inventories at least quarterly and records a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on its estimates of expected sales volume, production capacity and expiration dates of raw materials,work-in-process and finished products. Expected sales volumes are determined based on supply forecasts provided by key customers for the next 3 to 12 months. The

Company writes down inventory that has become obsolete, inventory that has a cost basis in excess of its expected net realizable value, and inventory in excess of expected requirements to cost of product revenue. Manufacturing of bioprocessing finished goods is done to order and tested for quality specifications prior to shipment. Reserves for excess and obsolete inventory were $343,000 and $78,000 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The reserve balance at December 31, 2015 and 2014 is sufficient to cover excess or obsolete inventory for the consolidated Company.

A change in the estimated timing or amount of demand for the Company’s products could result in additional provisions for excess inventory quantities on hand. Any significant unanticipated changes in demand or unexpected quality failures could have a significant impact on the value of inventory and reported operating results. During all periods presented in the accompanying financial statements, there have been no material adjustments related to a revised estimate of inventory valuations.

Work-in-process and finished products inventories consist of material, labor, outside processing costs and manufacturing overhead.

Inventories consistLease Accounting

Certain of the following (in thousands):Company’s operating leases where the Company is the lessee provide for minimum annual payments that increase over the life of the lease. The aggregate minimum annual payments are expensed on the straight-lined basis beginning when the Company takes possession of the property and extending over the term of the related lease, including renewal options when the exercise of the option is reasonably assured as an economic penalty may be incurred if the option is not exercised. The amount by which straight-line rent exceeds actual lease payment requirements in the early years of the leases is accrued as deferred rent and reduced in later years when the actual cash payment requirements exceed the straight-line expense. The Company also accounts in its straight-line computation for the effect of any “rental holidays” and lessor-paid tenant improvements.

   December 31,
2015
   December 31,
2014
 

Raw Materials

  $10,671    $5,374  

Work-in-process

   1,586     2,256  

Finished products

   5,741     4,754  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $17,998    $12,384  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accrued Liabilities

The Company estimates accrued liabilities by identifying services performed on the Company’s behalf, estimating the level of service performed and determining the associated cost incurred for such service as of each balance sheet date. For example, the Company would accrue for professional and consulting fees incurred with law firms, audit and accounting service providers and other third partythird-party consultants. These expenses are determined by either requesting those service providers to estimate unbilled services at each reporting date for services incurred or tracking costs incurred by service providers under fixed fee arrangements.

The Company has processes in place to estimate the appropriate amounts to record for accrued liabilities, which principally involve the applicable personnel reviewing the services provided. In the event that the Company does not identify certain costs that have begun to be incurred or the Company under or over-estimates the level of services performed or the costs of such services, the reported expenses for that period may be too low or too high. The date on which certain services commence, the level of services performed on or before a given date, and the cost of such services often require the exercise of judgment. The Company makes these judgments based upon the facts and circumstances known at the date of the financial statements.

Income Taxes

Deferred taxes are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided, if, based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions using a “more-likely-than-not”“more-likely-than-not” threshold for recognizing and resolving uncertain tax positions. The evaluation of uncertain tax positions is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in tax law, the measurement of

tax positions taken or expected to be taken in tax returns, the effective settlement of matters subject to audit, new audit activity and changes in facts or circumstances related to a tax position. The Company evaluates this tax position on a quarterly basis. The Company also accrues for potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Property, Plant & Equipment

Property, Plant & Equipment is recorded at cost less allowances for depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset as follows:

 

Classification

  

Estimated Useful Life

Buildings

Thirty years

Leasehold improvements

  Shorter of the term of the lease or estimated useful life

Equipment

  Three to eighttwelve years

Furniture and fixtures

  Three to eight years

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents then outstanding. Potential common share equivalents consist of restricted stock awards and the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants. Under the treasury stock method, unexercised “in-the-money”“in-the-money” stock options are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period or at issuance, if later. The assumed proceeds are then used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period. Share-based payment awards that entitle their holders to receivenon-forfeitable dividends before vesting are considered participating securities and are included in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share. There are no such participating securities as of December 31, 2018.

A reconciliation of basic and diluted share amounts is as follows:

 

   Years ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 

Numerator:

      

Net income

  $9,345,000    $8,170,000    $16,093,000  

Denominator:

      

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding

   32,881,940     32,497,657     31,667,015  

Weighted average common stock equivalents from assumed exercise of stock options and restricted stock awards

   695,151     766,010     739,626  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding

   33,577,091     33,263,667     32,406,641  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic net income per common share

  $0.28    $0.25    $0.51  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted net income per common share

  $0.28    $0.25    $0.50  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
               For the Years Ended December 31,              
   2018   2017   2016 
   (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) 

Net income

  $16,617   $28,353   $11,681 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average shares used in computing net income per share - basic

   43,767    38,234    33,573 

Effect of dilutive shares:

      

Stock options and restricted stock awards

   581    441    526 

Convertible senior notes

   1,123    475    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dilutive potential common shares

   1,704    916    526 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average shares used in computing net income per share - diluted

   45,471    39,150    34,099 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings per share:

      

Basic

  $0.38   $0.74   $0.35 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

  $0.37   $0.72   $0.34 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

At December 31, 2015,2018, there were outstanding options to purchase 1,240,935998,226 shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $10.44$27.54 per share.share and 705,413 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units (“RSUs”). For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, 196,2092018, 479,854 shares of the

Company’s common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices of the stock options were greater than or equal to the average price of the common shares and were therefore, anti-dilutive.

As provided by the terms of the indenture underlying the senior convertible notes, the Company has a choice to settle the conversion obligation for the Convertible Notes in cash, shares or any combination of the two. The Company currently intends to settle the par value of the Convertible Notes in cash and any excess conversion premium in shares. The Company applies the provisions of ASC 260,“Earnings Per Share”, Subsection10-45-44, to determine the diluted weighted average shares outstanding as it relates to the conversion spread on its convertible notes. Accordingly, the par value of the Convertible Notes is not included in the calculation of diluted income per share, but the dilutive effect of the conversion premium is considered in the calculation of diluted net income per share using the treasury stock method. The dilutive impact of the Convertible Notes is based on the difference between the Company’s current period average stock price and the conversion price of the convertible notes, provided there is a premium. Pursuant to this accounting standard, there is no dilution from the accreted principal of the Convertible Notes.

At December 31, 2017, there were outstanding options to purchase 734,940 shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $20.80 per share and 505,235 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of RSUs. For the year ended December 31, 2017, 317,923 shares of the Company’s common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices of the stock options were greater than or equal to the average price of the common shares and were therefore, anti-dilutive.

At December 31, 2014,2016, there were outstanding options to purchase 1,225,1171,236,586 shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $8.31$12.05 per share. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, 307,4752016, 381,686 shares of the Company’s common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices of the stock options were greater than or equal to the average price of the common shares and were therefore, anti-dilutive.

At December 31, 2013, there were outstanding options to purchase 1,610,988 shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $5.07 per share. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, 187,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices of the stock options were greater than or equal to the average price of the common shares, and were therefore anti-dilutive.

Segment Reporting

The Company views its operations, makes decisions regarding how to allocate resources and manages its business as one operating segment.segment and two reporting units. As a result, the financial information disclosed herein represents all of the material financial information related to the Company’s principalCompany.

The following table represents product revenues by product line:

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2018   2017(1)   2016(2,3) 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Chromatography products

  $45,326   $36,309   $29,520 

Filtration products

   90,586    49,050    19,774 

Protein products

   54,375    53,969    54,716 

Other

   3,604    1,761    431 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total product revenue

  $193,891   $141,089   $104,441 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

2017 revenue for filtration, chromatography and other products includes revenue related to Spectrum from August 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.

(2)

2016 revenue for filtration products includes revenue related to TangenX from December 14, 2016 through December 31, 2016.

(3)

2016 revenue for chromatography products includes revenue related to Atoll from April 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016.

Revenue from protein products includes our Protein A ligands and cell culture growth factors. Revenue from filtration products includes our XCell ATF Systems and consumables as well as our KrosFlo and SIUS filtration products. Revenue from chromatography products includes our OPUS and OPUS PD chromatography columns, chromatography resins and ELISA test kits. Other revenue primarily consists of revenue from the sale of operating segment.room products to hospitals as well as freight revenue.

The following table represents the Company’s total revenue by geographic area (based on the location of the customer):

 

   Years ended December 31, 
   2015  2014  2013 

Sweden

   37  38  35

United States

   28  33  51

United Kingdom

   17  20  12

Other

   18  9  2
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   100  100  100
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2018  2017  2016 

Revenue by customers’ geographic locations:

    

North America

   48  43  39

Europe

   40  46  54

APAC

   12  11  7

Other

   0  0  0
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenue

   100  100  100
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The following table represents the Company’s total assets by geographic area (in thousands):area:

 

   December 31,
2015
   December 31,
2014
 

United States

  $91,881    $83,785  

Sweden

   54,313     44,508  

Singapore

   43     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $146,237    $128,293  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   December 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Total assets by geographic locations:

    

North America

  $665,833   $654,673 

Europe

   104,750    85,169 

APAC

   4,038    3,677 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets by geographic location

  $774,621   $743,519 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table represents the Company’s long-lived assets by geographic area (in thousands):area:

 

   December 31,
2015
   December 31,
2014
 

United States

  $36,350    $38,695  

Sweden

   6,635     8,653  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $42,985    $47,348  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   December 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Long-lived assets by geographic locations:

    

North America

  $464,253   $465,453 

Europe

   29,426    34,430 

APAC

   848    854 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total long-lived assets by geographic location

  $494,527   $500,737 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

There were no long-lived assets in Singapore as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Significant Customers

Financial instruments that subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and accounts receivable. Per the Company’s investment policy, cash equivalents and marketable securities are invested in financial instruments with high credit ratings and credit exposure to any one issue, issuer (with the exception of U.S. treasury obligations) and type of instrument is limited. At December 31, 20152018 and 2014,2017, the Company had no investments associated with foreign exchange contracts, options contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements.

Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited to customers to whom the Company makes significant sales. While a reserve for the potentialwrite-off of accounts receivable is maintained, the

Company has not written off any significant accounts to date. To control credit risk, the Company performs regular credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition.

Revenue from significant customers as a percentage of the Company’s total revenue is as follows:

 

  Years ended December 31,   For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015 2014 2013   2018 2017 2016 

Orencia® Royalties from Bristol

   —      —      27

MilliporeSigma

   15 18 28

GE Healthcare

   37  38  35   15 21 29

MilliporeSigma

   29  33  25

Significant accounts receivable balances as a percentage of the Company’s total trade accounts receivable and royalties and other receivable balances are as follows:

 

  December 31, 
  December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014   2018 2017 

GE Healthcare

   13  29   17 11

MilliporeSigma

   32  7   11 19

Bioprocessing Customer C

   21  —    

Bioprocessing Customer D

   —      11

Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets and Acquisitions

Acquisitions

Total consideration transferred for acquisitions is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, if any, based on their fair values at the dates of acquisition. The fair value of identifiable intangible assets is based

on detailed valuations that use information and assumptions determined by management. Any excess of purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired is allocated to goodwill. Any excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired over the purchase price is recognized in the statement of operations.operations and comprehensive income. The fair value of contingent consideration includes estimates and judgments made by management regarding the probability that future contingent payments will be made and the extent of royalties to be earned in excess of the defined minimum royalties. Management updates these estimates and the related fair value of contingent consideration at each reporting period. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.operations and comprehensive income.

The Company uses the income approach to determine the fair value of certain identifiable intangible assets including customer relationships and developed technology. This approach determines fair value by estimatingafter-tax cash flows attributable to these assets over their respective useful lives and then discounting theseafter-tax cash flows back to a present value. The Company bases its assumptions on estimates of future cash flows, expected growth rates, expected trends in technology, etc. Discount rates used to arrive at a present value as of the date of acquisition are based on the time value of money and certain industry-specific risk factors.

Goodwill

Goodwill is not amortized and is reviewed for impairment at least annually.annually at the reporting unit level. There was no evidence of impairment to goodwill at December 31, 2015.2018 and 2017. There were no goodwill impairment charges during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013.2016.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives using the estimated economic benefit method, as applicable, and the amortization expense is recorded within cost of product revenue and selling, general and administrative expense in the statements of operations.operations and comprehensive income. Intangible assets and their related useful lives are reviewed at least annually to determine if any adverse conditions exist that would indicate

the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable. More frequent impairment assessments are conducted if certain conditions exist, including a change in the competitive landscape, any internal decisions to pursue new or different technology strategies, a loss of a significant customer, or a significant change in the marketplace, including changes in the prices paid for our products or changes in the size of the market for our products. If impairment indicators are present, the Company determines whether the underlying intangible asset is recoverable through estimated future undiscounted cash flows. If the asset is not found to be recoverable, it is written down to the estimated fair value of the asset based on the sum of the future discounted cash flows expected to result from the use and disposition of the asset. If the estimate of an intangible asset’s remaining useful life is changed, the remaining carrying amount of the intangible asset is amortized prospectively over the revised remaining useful life. The Company continues to believe that its intangible assets are recoverable at December 31, 2015.2018.

Intangible assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

   Gross Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
  Weighted
Average
Useful Life
(in years)
 

Technology – developed

  $3,295    $(1,026  12  

In process research and development

   1,600     —      —    

Patents

   240     (177  8  

Customer relationships

   11,805     (3,682  9  

Trademark/ tradename

   700     —      —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total intangible assets

  $17,640    $(4,885  10  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

Intangible assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

   Gross Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
  Weighted
Average
Useful Life
(in years)
 

Technology – developed

  $3,338    $(750  12  

In process research and development

   1,600     —      —    

Patents

   240     (148  8  

Customer relationships

   12,202     (2,546  9  

Trademark/ tradename

   700     —      —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total intangible assets

  $18,080    $(3,444  10  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

Amortization expense for amortized intangible assets was approximately $1,600,000, $1,425,000 and $1,022,000 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, the Company expects to record the approximate amortization expense (in thousands):

Years Ending

  Amortization Expense 

December 31, 2016

  $1,701  

December 31, 2017

   1,701  

December 31, 2018

   1,537  

December 31, 2019

   1,522  

December 31, 2020

   1,189  

Stock Based Compensation

The Company measures stock-based compensation cost at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award and recognizes it as expense over the employee’s requisite service period on a straight-line basis. The Company records the expense for share-based awards subject to performance-based milestone vesting over the remaining service period when management determines that achievement of the milestone is probable. Management evaluates whether the achievement of a performance-based milestone is probable as of the reporting date. The Company has no awards that are subject to market conditions. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense based upon options that are ultimately expected to vest, and accordingly, such compensation expense has been adjusted by an amount of estimated forfeitures.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the fair value of share-based awards on the grant date. The following assumptions are used in calculating the fair value of share-based awards:

Expected termThe expected term of options granted represents the period of time for which the options are expected to be outstanding. For purposes of estimating the expected term, the Company has aggregated all individual option awards into one group as the Company does not expect substantial differences in exercise behavior among its employees.

Expected volatilityThe expected volatility is a measure of the amount by which the Company’s stock price is expected to fluctuate during the expected term of options granted. The Company determines the expected volatility based primarily upon the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over a period commensurate with the option’s expected term.

Risk-free interest rateThe risk-free interest rate is the implied yield available on U.S. Treasuryzero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the option’s expected term on the grant date.

Expected dividend yieldThe Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on any of its capital stock and does not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the Company uses an expected dividend yield of zero to calculate the grant-date fair value of a stock option.

Estimated forfeiture ratesThe Company has applied, based on an analysis of its historical forfeitures, annual forfeiture rates of 8% for awards granted tonon-executive level employees, 3% for awards granted to executive level employees and 0% for awards granted tonon-employee members of the Board of Directors to all unvested stock options as of December 31, 2014.2018. The Company reevaluates this analysis periodically and adjusts these estimated forfeiture rates as necessary. Ultimately, the Company will only recognize expense for those shares that vest.

Advertising Costs

The Company expenses advertising costs as they are incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $0.2 million, $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

Recent Accounting Standards Updates

We consider the applicability and impact of all Accounting Standards Updates on our condensed consolidated financial statements. Updates not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. Recently issued Accounting Standards Updates which we feel may be applicable to us are as follows:

Recently Issued Accounting PronouncementsStandard Updates – Not Yet Adopted

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. (“ASU”)2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).”ASU2016-02, along with subsequent ASUs issued to clarify certain provisions of ASU2016-02 (collectively known as “ASC 842”), establishes aright-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record an ROU asset and a lease liability on the consolidated balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Certain qualitative and quantitative disclosures are also required. The Company will adopt ASU2016-02 and related amendments on January 1, 2019 using an optional method allowed with the issuance of ASU2018-11,“Leases – Targeted Improvements (Topic 842),” in July 2018. ASU2018-11 gives entities the option to not provide comparative period financial statements and instead apply the transition requirements as of the effective date of the new standard. Pursuant to additional guidance under ASC 842, the Company will also elect the optional package of practical expedients, which will allow the Company to not reassess: (i) whether expired or existing contracts contain leases; (ii) lease classification for any expired or existing leases; and (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases. ASC 842 also allow entities to make certain policy elections, some of which the Company plans to elect, including a policy to not record short-term leases on the balance sheet as mentioned above. The Company is currently working through the implementation of transition-related controls and finalizing accounting elections. Although the Company is still assessing the potential impact this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures, the Company currently estimates total ROU assets to be within the range of approximately $12 million to $14 million and lease liabilities to be within the range of approximately $16 million to $18 million upon adoption, before considering deferred taxes. The difference between the two ranges is due to approximately $4 million of unamortized lease incentives and deferred rent at the Company’s Marlborough and Waltham facilities as of December 31, 2018. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASC 842 to have a material impact on the consolidated statements of operations or consolidated statements of cash flows.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU2018-02,“Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,” which gives entities the option to reclassify to retained earnings tax effects related to items that have been stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”). For all entities, the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Entities can choose whether to apply the amendments retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the Act is recognized or to apply the amendments in the period of adoption. The Company will adopt this guidance on January 1, 2019 and does not expect its adoption to have a material impact on the its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU2018-13,“Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.”ASU2018-13 includes amendments that aim to improve the effectiveness of fair value measurement disclosures. The amendments in this guidance modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements based on the concepts in FASB Concepts Statement,“Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting - Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements, including the consideration of costs and benefits. The amendments become effective for the Company in the year ending December 31, 2020 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU2018-15,“Intangibles – Goodwill and Other –Internal-Use Software (Subtopic350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing

Arrangement That Is a Service Contract.”ASU2018-15 aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtaininternal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include aninternal-use software license). The guidance also requires the entity to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement, which includes reasonably certain renewals. The guidance becomes effective for the Company in the year ending December 31, 2020 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU2018-18,“Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808): Clarifying the Interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606.”ASU2018-18 clarifies the interaction between Topic 808,“Collaborative Arrangements,”and Topic 606,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers,”by making targeted improvements to US GAAP for collaborative arrangements and providing guidance on whether certain transactions between collaborative arrangement participants should be accounted for with revenue under Topic 606. This includes improving comparability in the presentation of revenue for certain transactions between collaborative arrangement participants by allowing presentation of the units of account in collaborative arrangements that are within the scope of Topic 606 together with revenue accounted for under Topic 606. The guidance becomes effective for the Company in the year ending December 31, 2020 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standard Updates – Adopted During the Period

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)ASU 2014-09, “Revenue“Revenue from Contracts with Customers”Customers (Topic 606), (“ASC 606”) which supersedes all existingthe revenue recognition requirements including most industry-specific guidance.in ASC 605,“Revenue Recognition, and creates a new Topic 606,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Two adoption methods are permitted: retrospectively to all prior reporting periods presented, with certain practical expedients permitted; or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially adopting the ASU recognized at the date of initial application. The new standard requires the Company to recognize revenue when it transfers goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that the Company expects to receive for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issuedadoption of this ASU No. included updates as provided under ASU2015-14,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which delayedDate”; ASU2016-08,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)”; ASU2016-10,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing”; and ASU2016-12,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients.” The Company adopted the effective dateprovisions of ASC 606 using the new standard from January 1, 2017 tomodified retrospective method effective January 1, 2018. The FASB also agreed to allow entities to choose to adopt the standard asSee Note 4,“Revenue Recognition”,below for further discussion of the original effective date. The Company has not yet determined which adoption method it will utilize or the effect that the adoptioneffects of this guidance will havestandard on itsthe Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015,August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement2016-15,“Statement of Inventory,” (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 requires inventory be measured at the lowerCash Flows (Topic 203): Classification of costCertain Cash Receipts and net realizable value,Cash Payments.” ASU2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues and options that currently exist for market value be eliminated. ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as estimated selling pricesclarifies their presentation and classification in the ordinary courseStatement of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The guidanceCash Flows. ASU2016-15 is effective prospectively for reporting periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 20162017 and interim periods within those fiscal yearsis to be applied retrospectively with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expecthas historically classified payments up to the amount of its contingent consideration liability recognized at the date of its acquisition as financing activities, with additional payments classified as operating activities. Because the Company has classified its contingent consideration payments as required by this standard, the adoption of ASU 2015-11 tothis standard did not have a materialany impact on its consolidated financial statements.statements when applied on a retrospective basis.

In September 2015,October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16,2016-16, “Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.” ASU2016-16 requires that the income tax consequences of an intra-entity asset transfer other than inventory are recognized at the time of the transfer. An entity will continue to recognize the income tax consequences of an intercompany transfer of inventory when the inventory is sold to a third party. The Company adopted this standard on a modified-retrospective basis on January 1, 2018. See Note 7,“Income Taxes”,below for a discussion of the impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-18,“Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash,” which requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total cash, which is inclusive of cash and cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end of period balances on the statement of cash flows upon adoption of this standard. The Company adopted this standard on a retrospective basis on January 1, 2018. The adoption resulted in an increase to cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $450,000 in the statement of cash flows at December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2017. The Company did not hold any restricted cash at December 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017.

In January 2017, the FASB issuedASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): SimplifyingClarifying the AccountingDefinition of a Business”, which clarifies the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for Measurement-Period Adjustments.” The new standard requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined and sets forth new disclosure requirements related to the adjustments. The new standard will be effective on January 1, 2016. The Company does not expect the adoptionas acquisitions (or disposals) of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.” The new standard requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position.or businesses. The Company adopted this standard as of December 31, 2015 with prospective application; accordingly,January 1, 2018, and the adoption of ASU2017-01 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-04,“Intangibles–Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” eliminating the requirement to calculate the implied fair value, essentially eliminating step two from the goodwill impairment test. ASU2017-04 requires goodwill impairment to be based upon the results of step one of the impairment test, which is defined as the excess of the carrying value of a reporting unit over its fair value. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard is effective for the Company reclassified all current deferred tax assets and liabilities to noncurrent on its consolidated balance sheeta prospective basis beginning on January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this standard as of December 31, 2015, which resulted in an immaterial reclassification of current deferred tax assets to other long-term liabilities. Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted uponJanuary 1, 2018, and the adoption of this new standard.standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

3.

Acquisitions Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Acquisitions

Refine Technology,Spectrum LifeSciences, LLC

On June 2, 2014,August 1, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of Spectrum pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchasean Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of June 2, 2014 (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”22, 2017 (such acquisition, the “Spectrum Acquisition”), by.

Spectrum is a diversified filtration company with a differentiated portfolio of hollow fiber cartridges, benchtop to commercial scale filtration and amongperfusion systems and a broad portfolio of disposable andsingle-use solutions. Spectrum’s products are primarily used for the Company, Refine Technology, LLC (a limited liabilityfiltration, isolation, purification and concentration of monoclonal antibodies, vaccines, recombinant proteins, diagnostic products and cell therapies where the company formed underoffers both standard and customized solutions to its bioprocessing customers.

Spectrum’s filtration products include its KrosFlo® line of hollow fiber cartridges, tangential flow filtration (“TFF”) systems andsingle-use flow path consumables, as well as its Spectra/Por® portfolio of laboratory dialysis products and itsPro-Connex®single-use hollow fiberModule-Bag-Tubing sets. Outside of filtration, Spectrum products include Spectra/Chrom® liquid chromatography products for research applications. These bioprocessing products account for the lawsmajority of the StateSpectrum revenues. Spectrum also offers a line of New Jersey) (“Refine”), the members of Refine Technology, LLC, Jerry Shevitz, Refine Technology Sales LLC (a limited liability company formed under the laws of the State of New Jersey) and Refine Technology Sales Asia PTE. LTD. (a limited private company organized in the

operating room products.

Consideration Transferred

Republic of Singapore), the Company acquired the business of Refine, including Refine’s Alternating Tangential Flow (“ATF”) System, a market-leading device used to significantly increase product yield during the fermentation step of the biologic drug manufacturing process (the “Refine Business” and the acquisition of the Refine Business, the “Refine Acquisition”). Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, Repligen purchased all of the assets related to Refine’s ATF system and assumed certain specified liabilities related to Refine’s ATF system. This acquisition strengthened Repligen’s bioprocessing business by adding a complementary product line while expanding its direct sales presence worldwide. The transaction wasCompany accounted for the Spectrum Acquisition as a purchase of a business under ASC 805,Business Combinations. The terms of the acquisition included an upfront cashSpectrum Acquisition was funded through payment of approximately $21,236,000 less approximately $66,000 as a result of$122.9 million in cash, the final determination of working capital, issuance of 215,2856,153,995 unregistered shares of the Company’s $0.01 par value common stock valued at $4,000,000, future potential milestone payments totaling up to $10,900,000 if specific sales targets are met$247.6 million and a working capital adjustment of $0.4 million for the years 2014, 2015 and 2016, and future potential payments up to $7,500,000 outa total purchase price of any amounts that might be received in connection with the resolution, withdrawal or settlement of certain patent disputes with a third party. The $10,900,000 potential contingent consideration had an initial probability weighted fair value at acquisition of $1,370,000. The $7,500,000 potential contingent consideration had only a nominal probability weighted fair value at acquisition. In addition to the initial consideration, approximately $774,000 was paid to Refine following the acquisition under a Transition Services Agreement under which certain employees of Refine provided services to the Company in support of the Refine Business. As these payments were contingent upon future service, they were recognized as operating expense, ratably while the services were provided.

Consideration Transferred

The Company accounted for the Refine Acquisition as the purchase of a business under U.S. GAAP.$370.9 million. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets of the Refine BusinessSpectrum were recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values, and consolidated with those of Repligen.the Company. The fair value of the net assets acquired was approximately $26,540,000.$370.9 million.

The preparation of theconsideration and purchase price information has been prepared using a valuation that required the use of significant assumptions and estimates.estimates in its preparation. Critical estimates included, but were not limited to, future expected cash flows, including projected revenues and expenses, and the applicable discount rates. These estimates were based on assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable. However,reasonable; however, actual results may differ from these estimates.

The total consideration transferred follows (in(amounts in thousands):

 

Cash consideration, less $66 of working capital adjustments

  $21,170  

Value of common stock issued

   4,000  

Estimated fair value of contingent consideration

   1,370  
  

 

 

 

Total consideration transferred

  $26,540  
  

 

 

 

Cash consideration

  $122,932 

Equity consideration

   247,575 

Working capital adjustment

   425 
  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

  $370,932 
  

 

 

 

The fair value of contingent consideration was determined based upon a probability weighted analysis of expected future milestone and settlement payments to be made to the seller. The Company paid $1,000,000 to Refine in 2015 for achievements of sales targets met in 2014, and could make payments of up to $9,900,000 if specific sales targets are met in 2015 and 2016. In addition, the Company could pay Refine up to $7,500,000 out of any receipts that might be received in connection with the resolution, withdrawal or settlement of certain patent disputes with a third party. The liability for contingent consideration is included in current and long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and will be remeasured at each reporting period until the contingency is resolved. Please see Note 10—Accrued Liabilities for further details.

Acquisition relatedAcquisition-related costs are not included as a component of consideration transferred but are expensed in the periods in which the costs are incurred. The Company has incurred approximately $818,000$2.9 million and $7.1 million in transactionintegration costs

related to the Refine Acquisition. The transactionSpectrum Acquisition in 2018 and 2017, respectively. These costs are primarily included in 2014 selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.operations and comprehensive income.

Fair Value of Net Assets Acquired

The allocation of purchase price was based onamounts recorded for the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumedin the Spectrum Acquisition are final, based on the facts and circumstances that existed as of June 2, 2014.the August 1, 2017, the acquisition date. The components and allocation of the purchase price consists of the following amounts (in(amounts in thousands):

 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $10,137 

Accounts receivable

  $1,647     5,075 

Inventory

   1,003     13,502 

Other current assets

   184  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

   616 

Fixed assets

   85     6,004 

Deferred tax assets

   1,102 

Customer relationships

   6,400     78,400 

Developed technology

   2,000     38,560 

In process research and development (“IPR&D”)

   1,600  

Trademark and trade name

   700  

Accounts payable and other liabilities assumed

   (431

Trademark and tradename

   2,160 

Non-compete agreements

   960 

Goodwill

   13,352     265,722 

Accounts payable

   (1,335

Unrecognized tax benefit

   (576

Accrued liabilities

   (5,787

Deferred tax liabilities

   (43,608
  

 

   

 

 

Net assets acquired

  $26,540  

Fair value of net assets acquired

  $370,932 
  

 

   

 

 

Of the consideration paid, $6,400,000$78.4 million represents the fair value of customer relationships that will be amortized over the weighted average determined useful life of 1015 years, and $2,000,000$38.6 million represents the fair value of developed technology that will be amortized over a determined useful life of 1520 years. $700,000$1.0 million represents the fair value of trademark and trade namenon-competition agreements that will be amortized over a determined to have an indefinite useful life and is not subject to amortization.

$1,600,000 of the consideration paid3 years. $2.2 million represents the fair value of acquired IPR&D projectstrademarks that are considered identifiablewill be amortized over a determined life of 2 to 20 years. The aforementioned intangible assets aswill be amortized on a straight-line basis.

The goodwill of $265.7 million represents future economic benefits expected to arise from synergies from combining operations and commercial organizations to increase market presence and the extension of existing customer relationships. None of the acquisition date. Those assets are considered indefinite lived until efforts associated with the projects are completed or abandoned. The major acquired technology IPR&D relatesgoodwill recorded is expected to the development of a single use system product extension to the ATF system business. The IPR&D project is not currently amortized and is reviewed for impairment at least annually. There was no evidence of impairment to IPR&D as of December 31, 2015. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and intangible assets acquired was recorded to goodwill. The goodwill recognized is attributable to expected synergies that the Company will realize from this acquisition. This goodwill isbe deductible for income tax purposes over the next 15 years.purposes.

Revenue, Net Income and Pro Forma Presentation

The Company recorded revenue from RefineSpectrum of $15,628,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015 and $6,793,000$19.4 million from June 2, 2014August 1, 2017 through December 31, 2014. The segregation of Refine’s net income is administratively impractical, as the Company operates as one operating segment and does not separately allocate expenses.2017. The Company has included the operating results of RefineSpectrum in its fiscal 2015 and 2014 consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income since the June 2, 2014August 1, 2017 acquisition date. The following table presents unaudited supplemental pro forma information as if the RefineSpectrum Acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2013 (in2017 (amounts in thousands, except per share data):

 

   December 31,
2014
   December 31,
2013
 

Total revenue

  $67,330,000    $76,331,000  

Net income

   9,493,000     16,403,000  

Earnings per share:

    

Basic

  $0.28    $0.58  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

  $0.27    $0.56  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   December 31, 2017 

Total revenue

  $162,913 

Net income (loss)

  $17,220 

Earnings (loss) per share:

  

Basic

  $0.41 
  

 

 

 

Diluted

  $0.40 
  

 

 

 

The unaudited pro forma information for the year-endedyears ended December 31, 2014 and 20132017 was calculated after applying the Company’s accounting policies and the impact of acquisition date fair value adjustments. Unaudited pro forma net income for year-endedyear ended December 31, 20142017 was adjusted to exclude acquisition-related transaction costs. These expenses have been added to the unaudited pro forma net income for the year-ended December 31, 2013. In addition, the unaudited pro forma net income for the year-ended December 31, 2014 was adjusted to excludecosts, nonrecurring expenses related to the fair value adjustments associated with the acquisition of Refine that were recorded byand income tax benefits resulting from the Company. Theacquisition. In addition, the unaudited pro forma net income for the year-endedyear ended December 31, 20132017 was adjusted to include these acquisition-related transaction costs and expenses relatedincremental amortization of intangible assets. These items have been factored to the fair value adjustments. The basic and diluted EPS calculations reflectunaudited pro forma net income for the issuance of shares to Refine as if the equity consideration had been granted on January 1, 2013.year ended December 31, 2017.

These pro forma condensed consolidated financial results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and include certain adjustments to reflect the pro forma results of operations as if the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented, such as fair value adjustments to inventory and increased amortization for the fair value of acquired intangible assets. The pro forma information does not reflect the effect of costs or synergies that would have been expected to result from the integration of the acquisition. The pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results of operations that actually would have resulted had the combination occurred at the beginning of each period presented, or of future results of the consolidated entities.

4.

Revenue Recognition

Adoption of ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers

The Company adopted ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method for all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. For contracts that were modified before the effective date, the Company reflected the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating transaction price in accordance with the practical expedient in paragraph ASC606-10-65-1-(f)-4, which did not have a material effect on the cumulative impact of adopting ASC 606. Results for reporting periods beginning January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for the prior period. The impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements as a result of applying ASC 606 was immaterial. Deferred revenue resulting from contracts with customers is included in accrued expenses on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

Disaggregation of Revenue

Revenues for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (amounts in thousands, except percentages):

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2018   2017   2016 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Product Revenue

  $193,891   $141,089   $104,441 

Royalty and other income

   141    147    100 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenue

  $194,032   $141,236   $104,541 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

When disaggregating revenue, the Company considered all of the economic factors that may affect its revenues. Because all of its revenues are from bioprocessing customers, there are no differences in the nature, timing and uncertainty of the Company’s revenues and cash flows from any of its product lines. However, given that the Company’s revenues are generated in different geographic regions, factors such as regulatory and geopolitical factors within those regions could impact the nature, timing and uncertainty of the Company’s revenues and cash flows. In addition, a significant portion of the Company’s revenues are generated from two customers; therefore, economic factors specific to these two customers could impact the nature, timing and uncertainty of the Company’s revenues and cash flows.

Disaggregated revenue from contracts with customers by geographic region can be found in Note 2.,“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – Segment Reporting,” above.

Revenue from significant customers is as follows (amounts in thousands):

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2018   2017   2016 

MilliporeSigma

  $29,843   $25,061   $28,856 

GE Healthcare

  $29,616   $30,150   $30,366 

Filtration Products

The Company’s Filtration product line generates revenue through the sale of KrosFlo® hollow fiber (“HF”) TFF membranes and modules, ProConnex®single-use flow path connectors, flat sheet TFF cassettes and hardware, and XCell alternating tangential flow (“ATF”) devices and related consumables.

The Company markets the KrosFlo line of HF cartridges and TFF systems and the ProConnex line ofsingle-use flow path connectors which were acquired as part of the Spectrum Acquisition. These products are used in the filtration, isolation, purification and concentration of biologics and diagnostic products. Sales of large-scale systems generally include components and consumables as well as training and installation services at the request of the customer. Because the initial sale of components and consumables are necessary for the operation of the system, such items are combined with the systems as a single performance obligation. Training and installation services do not significantly modify or customize these systems and therefore represent a distinct performance obligation.

The Company’s other Filtration product offerings are not highly interdependent of one another and are therefore considered distinct products that represent separate performance obligations. Revenue on these products is generally recognized at a point in time upon transfer of control to the customer. The Company invoices the customer for the installation and training services in an amount that directly corresponds with the value to the customer of the Company’s performance to date; therefore, revenue recognized is based on the amount billable to the customer in accordance with the practical expedient under ASC606-10-55-18.

The Company also markets flat sheet TFF cassettes and hardware. TFF is a rapid and efficient method for separation and purification of biomolecules that is widely used in laboratory, process development and process scale applications in biopharmaceutical manufacturing. The Company’ssingle-use SIUS TFF cassettes and hardware are not highly interdependent of one another and are therefore considered distinct products that represent separate performance obligations. SIUS TFF product revenue is generally recognized at a point in time upon transfer of control to the customer.

The Company also markets the XCell ATF System, a technologically advanced filtration device used in upstream processes to continuously remove cellular metabolic waste products during the course of a fermentation run, freeing healthy cells to continue producing the biologic drug of interest. ATF Systems typically include a filtration system and consumables (i.e., tube devices, metal stands) as well as training and installation services at the request of the customer. The filtration system and consumables are considered distinct products and therefore represent separate performance obligations. First time purchasers of the systems typically purchase a controller that is shipped with the tube device(s) and metal stand(s). The controller is not considered distinct as it is a proprietary product that is highly interdependent with the filtration system; therefore, the controller is combined with the filtration system and accounted for as a single performance obligation. The training and installation services do not significantly modify or customize the ATF system and therefore represent a distinct performance obligation. ATF system product revenue related to the filtration system (including the controller if applicable) and consumables is generally recognized at a point in time upon transfer of control to the customer. ATF system service revenue related to training and installation services is generally recognized over time, as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits as the Company performs. The Company invoices the customer for the installation and training services in an amount that directly corresponds with the value to the customer of the Company’s performance to date; therefore, revenue recognized is based on the amount billable to the customer in accordance with the practical expedient under ASC606-10-55-18.

Chromatography Products

The Company’s Chromatography product line includes a number of products used in the downstream purification and quality control of biological drugs. The majority of chromatography revenue relates to the OPUSpre-packed chromatography column line and Protein A chromatography resins. OPUS columns typically consist of the outer hardware of the column with a resin as ordered by the customer packed inside of the column. OPUS columns may also be ordered without the packed resin. In either scenario, the OPUS column and resin are not interdependent of one another and are therefore considered distinct products that represent separate performance obligations. Chromatography product revenue is generally recognized at a point in time upon transfer of control to the customer.

Protein Products

The Company’s Protein product line generates revenue through the sale of Protein A ligands and growth factors. Protein A ligands are an essential component of Protein A chromatography resins (media) used in the purification

of virtually all monoclonal antibody (“mAb”)-based drugs on the market or in development. The Company manufactures multiple forms of Protein A ligands under long-term supply agreements with major life sciences companies, who in turn sell their Protein A chromatography media to end users (biopharmaceutical manufacturers). The Company also manufactures growth factors for sale under long-term supply agreements with certain life sciences companies as well as direct sales to its customers. Each protein product is considered distinct and therefore represents a separate performance obligation. Protein product revenue is generally recognized at a point in time upon transfer of control to the customer.

Other Products

The Company’s other products include operating room products sold to hospitals. Other product revenue is generally recognized at a point in time upon transfer of control to the customer.

Transaction Price Allocated to Future Performance Obligations

Remaining performance obligations represents the transaction price of contracts for which work has not been performed or has been partially performed. The Company’s future performance obligations relate primarily to the installation and training of certain of its systems sold to customers. These performance obligations are completed within one year of receipt of a purchase order from its customers. Accordingly, the Company has elected to not disclose the value of these unsatisfied performance obligations as provided under ASC606-10-50-14.

Contract Balances from Contracts with Customers

The following table provides information about receivables and deferred revenue from contracts with customers as of December 31, 2018 (amounts in thousands):

   2018 

Balances from contracts with customers only:

  

Accounts receivable

  $33,015 

Deferred revenue

   1,290 

Revenue recognized during the three-month period ending December 31, 2018 relating to:

  

The beginning deferred revenue balance

  $422 

Changes in pricing related to products or services satisfied in previous periods

   —   

The timing of revenue recognition, billings and cash collections results in the accounts receivables and deferred revenue balances on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. There were no impairment losses on receivables during the year ending December 31, 2018.

A contract asset is created when the Company satisfies a performance obligation by transferring a promised good to the customer. Contract assets may represent conditional or unconditional rights to consideration. The right is conditional, and recorded as a contract asset, if the Company must first satisfy another performance obligation in the contract before it is entitled to payment from the customer. Contract assets are transferred to billed receivables once the right becomes unconditional. If the Company has the unconditional right to receive consideration from the customer, the contract asset is accounted for as a billed receivable and presented separately from other contract assets. A right is unconditional if nothing other than the passage of time is required before payment of that consideration is due.

When consideration is received, or such consideration is unconditionally due, from a customer prior to transferring goods or services to the customer under the terms of a contract, a contract liability is recorded. Contract liabilities are recognized as revenue after control of the products or services is transferred to the customer and all revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Costs to Obtain or Fulfill a Customer Contract

The Company’s sales commission structure is based on achieving revenue targets. The commissions are driven by revenue derived from customer purchase orders which are short term in nature.

Applying the practical expedient in paragraph340-40-25-4, the Company recognizes the incremental costs of obtaining contracts as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the assets that the Company otherwise would have recognized is one year or less. These costs are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses. When shipping and handling costs are incurred after a customer obtains control of the products, the Company accounts for these as costs to fulfill the promise and not as a separate performance obligation.

5.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the estimated fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill acquired in a business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life is not amortized, but instead is tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with ASC 350. The following table represents the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for the yearyears ended December 31, 2015 is as follows (in2018 and 2017 (amounts in thousands):

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

  $14,185  

Adjustments to goodwill arising from Refine acquisition

   161  
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

  $14,346  
  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2016

  $59,548 

Goodwill adjustment related to TangenX acquisition

   85 

Acquisition of Spectrum Lifesciences, LLC

   265,519 

Cumulative translation adjustment

   2,181 
  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2017

  $327,333 

Goodwill adjustment related to Spectrum Lifesciences, LLC acquisition

   203 

Cumulative translation adjustment

   (801
  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2018

  $326,735 
  

 

 

 

During each of the fourth quarters of 2018, 2017 and 2016, we completed our annual impairment assessments and concluded that goodwill was not impaired in any of those years.

Other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets, except for the Refine Technology, LLCATF tradename, and in-process research and development, are amortized over their useful lives using the estimated economic benefit method, as applicable, and the amortization expense is recorded within selling, general and administrative expense in the Company’s statements of operations and comprehensive income. The Refine Technology, LLCATF tradename and in-process research and development areis not amortized. The Company reviews ourits indefinite-lived intangible assets not subject to amortization to determine if adverse conditions exist or a change in circumstances exists that would indicate an impairment. Intangible assets and their related useful lives are reviewed at least annually to determine if any adverse conditions exist that would indicate the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable. More frequent impairment assessments are conducted if certain conditions exist, including a change in the competitive landscape, any internal decisions to pursue new or different technology strategies, a loss of a significant customer, or a significant change in the marketplace, including changes in the prices paid for our products or changes in the size of the market for our products. An impairment results if the carrying value of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. If the estimate of an intangible asset’s remaining useful life is changed, the remaining carrying amount of the intangible asset is amortized prospectively over the revised remaining useful life. The Company continues to believe that its intangible assets are recoverable at December 31, 2015.2018.

4.Income Taxes

Income tax dataIntangible assets, net consisted of the following at December 31, 2018:

   December 31, 2018 
   Gross
Carrying
Value
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Net
Carrying
Value
   Weighted
Average
Useful Life

(in years)
 
   (Amounts in thousands)     

Finite-lived intangible assets:

        

Technology - developed

  $53,315   $(5,942  $47,373    19 

Patents

   240    (240   —      8 

Customer relationships

   101,460    (16,609   84,851    14 

Trademarks

   2,160    (159   2,001    20 

Other intangibles

   1,061    (548   513    3 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total finite-lived intangible assets

   158,236    (23,498   134,738    16 

Indefinite-lived intangible asset:

        

Trademarks

   700    —      700    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total intangible assets

  $158,936   $(23,498  $135,438   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Intangible assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2017:

   December 31, 2017 
   Gross
Carrying
Value
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Net
Carrying
Value
   Weighted
Average
Useful Life

(in years)
 
   (Amounts in thousands)     

Finite-lived intangible assets:

        

Technology - developed

  $51,801   $(3,201  $48,600    19 

Patents

   240    (238   2    8 

Customer relationships

   102,120    (9,636   92,484    14 

Trademarks

   2,160    (47   2,113    20 

Other intangibles

   1,063    (209   854    3 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total finite-lived intangible assets

   157,384    (13,331   144,053    16 

Indefinite-lived intangible asset:

        

Trademarks

   700    —      700    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total intangible assets

  $158,084   $(13,331  $144,753   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets was $10.6 million, $6.2 million and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013 (in2016, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, the Company expects to record the following amortization expense (amounts in thousands):

 

   December 31, 2015  December 31, 2014  December 31, 2013 

The components of income from operations before income taxes are as follows:

    

Domestic

  $(2,490 $(1,152 $12,783  

Foreign

   15,913    12,290    10,231  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $13,423   $11,138   $23,014  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The current and deferred components of the provision for income taxes on operations are as follows:

    

Current

  $3,745   $2,480   $4,124  

Deferred

   333    488    2,797  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $4,078   $2,968   $6,921  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The jurisdictional components of the provision for income taxes on operations are as follows:

    

Federal

  $295   $214   $3,322  

State

   276    (67  1,306  

Foreign

   3,507    2,821    2,293  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $4,078   $2,968   $6,921  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

  Estimated
Amortization
Expense
 

2019

  $10,536 

2020

   9,955 

2021

   9,464 

2022

   9,462 

2023

   9,462 

2024 and thereafter

   85,859 
  

 

 

 

Total

  $134,738 
  

 

 

 

At

6.

Consolidated Balance Sheet Detail

Inventories, net

Inventories, net consists of the following:

   December 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Raw materials

  $24,937   $22,351 

Work-in-process

   5,185    4,083 

Finished products

   12,141    12,570 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total inventories, net

  $42,263   $39,004 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:

   December 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Equipment maintenance and services

  $1,677   $1,091 

Prepaid taxes

   843    311 

Prepaid insurance

   629    594 

Deferred costs

   55    67 

Other

   697    218 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total prepaid expenses and other current assets

  $3,901   $2,281 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:

   December 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Land

  $1,023   $1,023 

Buildings

   764    764 

Leasehold improvements

   16,259    15,673 

Equipment

   24,092    21,904 

Furniture and fixtures

   5,448    4,272 

Construction in progress(1)

   12,906    2,581 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total property, plant and equipment

   60,492    46,217 

Less - Accumulated depreciation

   (28,312   (23,800
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total property, plant and equipment, net

  $32,180   $22,417 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

Construction in progress as of December 31, 2018 includes $7.3 million for the buildout of our Marlborough facility, $2.1 million in capitalizedinternal-use software development costs and $2.1 million for a casting machine, among other projects.

Depreciation expense totaled $5.2 million, $4.2 million and $3.3 million in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015,2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

   December 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Employee compensation

  $9,953   $9,560 

Taxes

   1,024    1,668 

Royalty and license fees

   242    1,383 

Accrued purchases

   683    1,191 

Warranties

   546    598 

Professional fees

   942    947 

Deferred revenue

   1,290    960 

Other

   1,185    1,622 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accrued liabilities

  $15,865   $17,929 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

7.

Income Taxes

The components of income from operations before income taxes are as follows:

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2018   2017   2016 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Domestic

  $(73  $(6,709  $(4,882

Foreign

   21,509    13,957    16,574 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from operations before income taxes

  $21,436   $7,248   $11,692 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The components of the income tax provision (benefit) from operations are as follows:

   For the Years Ended
December 31,
 
   2018  2017  2016 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Current and deferred components of the tax provision (benefit) from operations:

    

Current

  $4,354  $3,624  $4,077 

Deferred

   465   (24,729  (4,066
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $4,819  $(21,105 $11 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Jurisdictional components of the tax provision (benefit) from operations:

    

Federal

  $(393 $(24,012 $(3,809

State

   718   (438  (207

Foreign

   4,494   3,345   4,027 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $4,819  $(21,105 $11 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

During 2018, the Company hadutilized its remaining U.S. net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $46,984,000 and$19.5 million. At December 31, 2018, the Company had federal business tax creditscredit carryforwards of approximately $1,920,000$2.9 million and state business tax credit carryforwards of $0.4 million available to reduce future federaldomestic income taxes, if any. The cumulative U.S. federal net operating loss includes $10,242,000 related to excess tax deductions from share-based payments, the tax benefit of which will be recognized as an increase to additional paid in capital when the deduction reduces current taxes payable. The net operating loss and business tax credits carryforwards will continue to expire at various dates through December 2035.2038. The net operating loss and business tax credit carryforwards are subject to review and possible adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service and may be limited in the event of certain changes in the ownership interest of significant stockholders.

The Company’s consolidatedcomponents of deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following (in thousands):income taxes are as follows:

 

    December 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 

Deferred tax assets:

   

Temporary timing differences:

   

Stock compensation

  $1,079   $628  

Contingent consideration

   2,126    767  

Other

   1,150    1,674  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total temporary timing differences

   4,355    3,069  

Net operating loss carryforwards

   12,389    12,580  

Tax business credits carryforwards

   1,820    1,782  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   18,564    17,431  

Valuation allowance

   (18,514  (17,298
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

  $50   $133  

Deferred tax liabilities:

   

Goodwill and intangible assets

  $(501 $(251
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax liabilities

  $(451 $(118
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   December 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Deferred tax assets:

    

Temporary timing differences:

    

Stock-based compensation expense

  $2,874   $1,662 

Contingent consideration

   2,263    2,196 

Other

   2,632    1,704 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total temporary timing differences

   7,769    5,562 

Net operating loss carryforwards

   —      4,361 

Tax business credits carryforwards

   2,004    1,265 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   9,773    11,188 

Less: Valuation allowance

   (131   (6
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

   9,642    11,182 

Deferred tax liabilities:

    

Goodwill

   (1,076   (807

Acquired intangible assets

   (26,903   (32,359

Conversion option on convertible notes

   (2,394   (3,183
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (30,373   (36,349
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net deferred tax liabilities

  $(20,731  $(25,167
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The net change in the total valuation allowance was an increase of $1,216,000 in the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase is attributable to increases in deferred tax assets derived from temporary timing differences. The valuation allowance increased by $727,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014 and decreased by $1,736,0002018 was an increase of $0.1 million. The net change in the total valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2013.2017 was a decrease of $10.0 million which included the changes below. During 2013, based on the Company’s pre-tax income position,first quarter of 2017 the Company believedadopted ASU2016-09. ASU2016-09 states that it waspreviously unrecognized excess

tax benefits related to stock-based compensation should be recognized on a modified retrospective basis. As such, the Company increased its U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryovers by $5.1 million as of January 1, 2017 for previously unrecognized stock-based compensation excess tax benefits outstanding as of the beginning of the period. Because the Company maintained a full valuation allowance on its U.S. deferred tax assets at that date, the Company recorded a corresponding increase to the valuation allowance as of January 1, 2017. During the second quarter of 2017, the Company agreed to sell certain intellectual property to Repligen Sweden AB that allowed for the Company to utilize certain of its U.S. deferred tax assets. Accordingly, the Company reduced its valuation allowance on its U.S. deferred tax assets by $9.2 million. Additionally, in conjunction with the Spectrum Acquisition, the Company determined that its U.S. deferred tax assets were more likely than not to be realized after considering deferred tax liabilities related to the acquired intangible assets. Accordingly, the Company reduced its valuation allowance on its U.S. deferred tax assets by $5.9 million. The valuation allowance decreased by $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2018, the Company believes that it would generate sufficient taxable income to realize the tax benefit of a portionrealization of its deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2013, because the Company would no longer receive royalty payments on Bristol’s sales of Orencia, the Company concluded that realization of deferredassets related to capital loss carryovers and certain foreign tax assets beyond December 31, 2013 was not more likely than not, and as such, the Company maintained a valuation allowance against the majority of its remaining deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2015 the Company continues to believe that realization of deferred tax assets beyond December 31, 2015 iscredits are not more likely than not, and the Company continues to maintain a fullits valuation allowance against its remainingthose U.S. deferred tax assets with the exception for certain state tax credits.assets.

The reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to the effective income tax rate for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 is as follows (amounts in thousands):follows:

 

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2018 2017 2016 
 Year Ended   Amount % Amount % Amount % 
 December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013   (Amounts in thousands, except percentages) 

Income before income taxes

 $13,423    $11,138    $23,014     $21,436   $7,248   $11,692  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

Expected tax at statutory rate

  4,564    34.0  3,787    34.0  7,825    34.0   4,502  21.0 2,537  35.0 3,975  34.0

Adjustments due to:

             

Difference between U.S. and foreign tax

  (1,910  (14.2%)   (1,471  (13.2%)   (1,228  (5.3%)    345  1.6 (1,797 (24.8%)  (2,031 (17.4%) 

State income and franchise taxes

  563    4.2  122    1.1  1,122    4.9

State income and franchise tax

   (146 (0.7%)  (307 (4.2%)  (326 (2.8%) 

Business tax credits

  (115  (0.9%)   —      —      —      —       (1,523 (7.1%)  (708 (9.8%)  (236 (2.0%) 

Permanent differences

  118    0.9  (172  (1.5%)   (298  (1.3%) 

Permanent differences:

       

Stock-based compensation expense

   (1,213 (5.7%)  (946 (13.1%)  31  0.3

Transaction costs

   —    0.0 1,232  17.0 156  1.3

U.S. taxation of foreign earnings

   2,190  10.2  —    0.0  —    0.0

Executive compensation

   367  1.7 265  3.7  —    0.0

Other

   97  0.5 205  2.8 380  3.3

Change in U.S. federal tax rates

   —    0.0 (12,839 (177.1%)   —    0.0

Change in U.S. state tax rates

   748  3.5 (151 (2.1%)   —    0.0

Change in Netherlands tax rate

   (388 (1.8%)   —    0.0  —    0.0

Transition tax

   (1,338 (6.2%)  3,266  45.1  —    0.0

Uncertain tax provisions

   1,021  4.8 241  3.3  —    0.0

Change in valuation allowance

  1,216    9.1  727    6.5  (509  (2.2%)    125  0.6 (12,164 (167.8%)  (1,981 (16.9%) 

Return to provision adjustments

   33  0.2 (161 (2.2%)   —    0.0

Other

  (358  (2.7%)   (25  (0.2%)   9    —       (1 (0.1%)  222  3.0 43  0.4
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 $4,078    30.4 $2,968    26.7 $6,921    30.1

Income tax provision (benefit)

  $4,819  22.5 $(21,105 (291.2%)  $11  0.1
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

In June 2015, the Company received a final assessment from the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (“DOR”) regarding an examination for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2011 and the nine months ended December 31, 2011. This examination related to the qualification of Research and Development

The Company’s tax credits. The final settlement resulted in a payment to the DOR of approximately $141,000, inclusive of interest and penalties.

In December 2015, the Company reached a negotiated settlement with the DOR regarding an appeal of an assessment made in 2013 for the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2009. The primary issues in the appeal related to the sourcing of intellectual property settlements and the qualification of Research and Development tax credits. The final settlement resulted in a payment to the DOR of approximately $1,012,000, inclusive of interest. Of this amount, $926,000 had been provided for as a liability for an uncertain tax position as of September 30, 2015.

As a result of these settlements, the fiscal years ended March 31, 2008 through December 31, 2011 are now closed under the Massachusetts statute. The fiscal years ended December 31, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015returns are subject to examination by federal, state and international taxing authorities for the federal and state taxing authorities.following periods:

At December 31, 2015, the Company had accumulated Federal research credits of $2,578,000 which were not recognized for financial statement purposes, as it was not more likely than not that the Company would have sufficient earnings to realize those benefits in addition to the benefits the Company may derive from use of its Net Operating Losses. However, given the past uncertainty at the state level regarding their sustainability under audit, the Company applied a reserve of $1,289,000 against these cumulative Federal research credits.

Jurisdiction

Fiscal Years Subject
to Examination

United States – federal and state

2015-2018

Sweden

2012-2018

Germany

2017-2018

Netherlands

2012-2018

The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):benefits:

 

Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2015

   2,118  

Gross increases – tax positions in prior period

   324  

Gross decreases – settlements

   (1,153
  

 

 

 

Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2015

  $1,289  
  

 

 

 
   For the Years Ended December 31, 
       2018           2017     
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of period

  $1,806   $1,407 

Gross amounts of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax positions taken in the current period

   1,062    199 

Gross amounts of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax positions taken in the prior period

   —      679 

Gross amounts of decrease due to release

   (16   (479
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits, end of period

  $2,852   $1,806 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The amountIncluded in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits atas of December 31, 20152018 are $2.9 million of tax benefits that, will impact ourif recognized, would affect the effective tax rate are $1,289,000. For the year endedrate.

As of December 31, 2015,2018, the Company recognized interesthas accumulated undistributed earnings generated by our foreign subsidiaries of approximately $72.4 million. Because $58.0 million of such earnings have previously been subject to the one-time transition tax on foreign earnings required by the 2017 Tax Act, any additional taxes due with respect to such earnings or the excess of the amount for financial reporting over the tax basis of our foreign investments would generally be limited to foreign and penalties of $272,000.

state taxes. At December 31, 2015, the Company has2018, we have not provided for U.S. income taxes or foreign withholding taxes on outside basis differences of our foreign subsidiaries, as we have the ability and intent to indefinitely reinvest the undistributed earnings of approximately $30,322,000our foreign subsidiaries, and there are no needs for such earnings in the United States that would contradict our plan to indefinitely reinvest.

ASU2016-16,“Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory,” requires the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory to be recognized when the intra-entity transfer occurs rather than deferring recognition of income tax consequences until the transfer was made with an outside party. The Company adopted the provisions of this ASU in the first quarter of 2018. The adoption resulted in a decrease of $5.7 million to other assets, a decrease of $5.0 million to deferred tax assets and a decrease of $0.7 million to accumulated deficit at January 1, 2018.

On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law H.R. 1/Public LawNo. 115-97, the tax legislation commonly known as it isthe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Tax Act”). The Act made significant changes to federal tax law, including, but not limited to, a reduction in the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%, taxation of certain global intangiblelow-taxed income, allowing for immediate expensing of qualified assets, stricter limits on deductions for interest and certain executive compensation, and aone-time transition tax on previously deferred earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries.

In December 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) to address the application of GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax

effects of H.R.1. The Company recognized the provisional tax impacts related to deemed repatriated earnings and the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities and included these amounts in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. During 2018, final adjustments noted below have been made to the provisional amounts recorded during 2017, and the Company has now completed its accounting for various tax impacts of the Act.

The Act lowered the Company’s current intentionU.S. statutory federal tax rate from 35% to permanently reinvest these21% effective January 1, 2018. The Company recorded a tax benefit of $12.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2017 for the reduction in its US deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from the rate change. The accounting for this item is complete and no adjustments were made to this amount during 2018.

The Act included aone-time deemed repatriation transition tax whereby entities that are shareholders of a specified foreign corporation must include in gross income the undistributed and previously untaxed post-1986 earnings outsideand profits of the U.S. Itspecified foreign corporation. Our provisional amount recorded at December 31, 2017 increased our tax provision by $3.3 million. As of December 31, 2018, the accounting for this item is not practicalcomplete. For the three months ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $1.3 million, as a result of refining our calculations of post-1986 earnings and profits for our foreign subsidiaries.

The Company is subject to estimatea territorial tax system under the additional taxes that may be payable upon repatriation.Act, in which the Company is required to provide for tax on Global IntangibleLow-Taxed Income (“GILTI”) earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. The Company has adopted an accounting policy to provide for the tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax is incurred as a period expense.

 

5.8.

Stockholders’ Equity

Public Offering of Common Stock

On July 3, 2017, the Company completed a public offering in which 2,807,017 shares of its common stock were sold to the public at a price of $42.75 per share. The underwriters were granted an option, which they exercised in full, to purchase an additional 421,052 shares of the Company’s common stock. The total proceeds from this offering, net of underwriting discounts, commissions and Warrantsother offering expenses, totaled $129.3 million.

Stock Option and Incentive Plans

At December 31, 2013,our 2018 annual meeting of shareholders held on May 16, 2018, our shareholders approved the Company has2018 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”). Under the 2018 Plan the number of shares of our common stock that are reserved 4,005,174and available for issuance shall be 2,778,000 plus the number of shares of common stock pursuant to the Plans, as described below. On April 6, 2007, the Company issued warrants to an individual at Scripps to purchase up to 150,000available for issuance under our Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”). The shares of common stock at $0.01 per share, as discussed in Note 10. The warrants have a seven-year termunderlying any awards under the 2018 Plan, 2012 Plan and are exercisable based on performance criteria as detailed in the warrant agreement during 2014. The warrant expired prior to the performance criteria being achieved.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of approximately $3,598,000, $1,766,000 and $1,060,000 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, for share-based awards granted under the Second Amended and Restated 2001 Repligen Corporation Stock Plan (the “2001 Plan”) and the Repligen Corporation 2012 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan,” and collectivelytogether with the 20012018 Plan and the 1992 Repligen Corporation Stock Option2012 Plan, the “Plans”). that are forfeited, canceled or otherwise terminated (other than by exercise) shall be added back to the shares of stock available for issuance under the 2018 Plan. At December 31, 2018, 2,874,751 shares were available for future grant under the 2018 Plan.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $10.2 million, $6.7 million and $4.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for share-based awards granted under the Plans.

The following table presents stock-based compensation expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):and comprehensive income:

 

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  Years ended December 31,   2018   2017   2016 
  2015   2014   2013   (Amounts in thousands) 

Cost of product revenue

  $213    $128    $74    $1,019   $704   $341 

Research and development

   336     185     97     917    481    537 

Selling, general and administrative

   3,049     1,453     889     8,256    5,562    3,717 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $3,598    $1,766    $1,060  

Total stock-based compensation

  $10,192   $6,747   $4,595 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

During 2015,2016, the Company modified certain stock option grants for its former senior vice president of research and chief executive officerdevelopment in conjunction with his retirement. As part of the January 2015April 2016 transition agreement, all outstanding equity awards continued to vest through December 31, 2015,2016, and fifty percent (50%) of the option awards that are unvested on December 31, 2015February 28, 2017 immediately vested and became exercisable as of that date. As a result of these modifications to his share-based payment arrangements, the Company incurred stock compensation expense of $826,000$0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016. This expense was recorded to selling, generalresearch and administrativedevelopment expense on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.operations and comprehensive income.

The 20122018 Plan allows for the granting of incentive and nonqualified options to purchase shares of common stock, restricted stock and other equity awards. Incentive options granted to employeesEmployee grants under the Plans generally vest over a threethree- to five-year period, with20%-33% vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant and the remainder vesting in equal yearly installments thereafter. Nonqualified options issued tonon-employee directors

and consultants under the Plans generally vest over one year. In the first quarter of 2018, to create a longer-term retention incentive, the Company’s Compensation Committee granted long-term incentive compensation awards to its Chief Executive Officer consisting of both stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that are subject to time-based vesting over nine years. Options granted under the Plans have a maximum term of ten years from the date of grant and generally, the exercise price of the stock options equals the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. At December 31, 2015,2018, options to purchase 1,240,935998,226 shares and 705,413 RSUs were outstanding under the Plans. At December 31, 2015, 2,441,761 shares were available for future grant under the 2012 Plan.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the fair value of share-basedstock option awards on the grant date.date, and the Company uses the value of the common stock as of the grant date to value RSUs. The Company measures stock-based compensation cost at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award. The Company recognizes expense on awards with service-based vesting over the employee’s requisite service period on a straight-line basis. In the third quarter of 2017, the Company issued performance stock units to certain employees related to the Spectrum Acquisition which are tied to the achievement of certain revenue and gross margin metrics and the passage of time. Additionally, in the first quarter of 2018, the Company issued performance stock units to certain individuals which are tied to the achievement of certain 2018 revenue metrics and the passage of time. The Company recognizes expense on performance-based awards over the vesting period based on the probability that the performance metrics will be achieved. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for options that are ultimately expected to vest, and accordingly, such compensation expense has been adjusted for estimated forfeitures. The fair value of share-based awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 were calculated using the following estimated assumptions:

 

  2015  2014  2013  For the Years Ended December 31,

Expected term (years)

  6.6 -7.2  6.5  6.5

Volatility

  50.09 - 51.89%  51.00 - 51.71%  51.39% - 53.63%
  2018 2017 2016

Expected term (in years)

  5.5 – 7.5 6.1 6.7 – 7.1

Expected volatility (range)

  45.14 – 50.87% 51.48% 50.85 – 51.01%

Risk-free interest rate

  1.67 – 2.03%  1.88 - 2.11%  1.09% - 2.08%  2.63 – 2.96% 1.88 – 1.99% 1.51 – 2.37%

Expected dividend yield

  —    —    —    0% 0% 0%

Information regarding option activity for the year ended December 31, 20152018 under the Plans is summarized below:

 

   Options
Outstanding
  Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price Per
Share
   Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in years)
   (in  thousands)
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2014

   1,225,117   $8.31      

Granted

   310,857    15.23      

Exercised

   (177,693  5.22      

Forfeited/cancelled

   (117,346  8.81      
  

 

 

      

Options outstanding at December 31, 2015

   1,240,935   $10.44     6.42    $22,653  
  

 

 

      

Options exercisable at December 31, 2015

   559,922   $6.77     3.89    $12,048  
  

 

 

      

Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2015 (1)

   1,183,574   $10.42     6.36    $21,652  
  

 

 

      
   Shares   Weighted

average

exercise

price
   Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

(in Years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic

Value
(in Thousands)
 

Options outstanding at December 31, 2017

   734,940   $20.80     

Granted

   449,678   $35.48     

Exercised

   (176,804  $19.31     

Forfeited/expired/cancelled

   (9,588  $29.71     
  

 

 

       

Options outstanding at December 31, 2018

   998,226   $27.54    7.19   $25,273 
  

 

 

       

Options exercisable at December 31, 2018

   410,760   $18.53    4.96   $14,051 
  

 

 

       

Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2018(1)

   953,454      7.10   $24,490 
  

 

 

       

 

(1)This represents

Represents the number of vested options as of December 31, 20152018 plus the number of unvested options expected to vest as of December 31, 20152018 based on the unvested outstanding options at December 31, 20152018 adjusted for estimated forfeiture rates of 8% for awards granted tonon-executive level employees and 3% for awards granted to executive level employees.

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the totalpre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the closing price of the common stock on December 31, 20152018, the last business day of $28.292018, of $52.74 per share and the exercise price of eachin-the-money option) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2015.2018. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was approximately $4,942,000, $10,475,000$5.3 million, $5.3 million and $3,723,000,$5.0 million, respectively.

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was $22.45, $11.12$18.90, $16.94 and $4.31,$14.16, respectively. The total fair value of stock options that vested during the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 20132016 was approximately $2,317,000, $1,084,000$2.3 million, $2.2 million and $991,000,$1.7 million, respectively.

Information regarding RSU activity for the year ended December 31, 2018 under the Plans is summarized below:

   Shares   Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

(in Years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic

Value
(in Thousands)
 

Unvested at December 31, 2017

   505,235     

Awarded

   407,961     

Vested

   (153,383    

Forfeited/expired/cancelled

   (54,400    
  

 

 

     

Unvested at December 31, 2018

   705,413    3.98   $37,203 
  

 

 

     

Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2018(1)

   652,543    3.26   $34,415 
  

 

 

     

(1)

Represents the number of vested RSUs units as of December 31, 2018 plus the number of unvested RSUs expected to vest as of December 31, 2018 based on the unvested outstanding RSUs at December 31, 2018 adjusted for estimated forfeiture rates of 8% for awards granted tonon-executive level employees and 3% for awards granted to executive level employees.

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the totalpre-tax intrinsic value (equal to the closing price of the common stock on December 31, 2018, the last business day of 2018, of $52.74 per share, as RSUs do not have an exercise price) that would have been received by the RSU holders had all holders exercised on December 31, 2018. The aggregate intrinsic value of RSUs vested during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $6.2 million, $4.0 million and $1.7 million, respectively.

The weighted average grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $30.30, $26.03 and $27.25, respectively. The total fair value of RSUs that vested during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $4.6 million, $4.0 million and $1.5 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2015,2018, there was $6,547,000$27.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based awards. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average remaining requisite service period of 3.084.53 years. The Company expects 623,6521,195,236 unvested options and RSUs to vest over the next five years.

6.9.

Commitments and Contingencies

Lease Commitments

In 2001,January 2018, the Company entered into a ten-year lease agreement for approximately 25,000to rent a 63,761 square feetfoot manufacturing facility in Marlborough, Massachusetts. This facility is currently being transitioned to take over production of space located in Waltham,SIUS TFF from our Shrewsbury, Massachusetts facility. We expect this transition to be used for its corporate headquarters, manufacturing, researchfully completed by June 30, 2019. This lease expires on November 30, 2028 and development, and marketing and administrative operations. the total obligations related to this lease are included in the table below.

In July 2011,2017, as a result of the Spectrum Acquisition, the Company amended this agreementretained the obligation related to expand the lease to cover approximately 55,694 square feet and to extend the term of the lease by eleven years,manufacturing space in Rancho Dominguez, California, which expires on May 31, 2023. In connection with this lease agreement,July 15, 2020. The space is an approximately 54,000 square foot manufacturing facility which includes manufacturing, quality control and inventory areas as well as clean room suites. This space was expanded by approximately 15,000 square feet in November 2018 when the Company issued a letter of creditleased space in the amount of $200,000 to the lessor. The letter of credit is collateralized by a certificate of deposit held by the bank that issued the letter of credit. The certificate of deposit is classified as restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.an adjacent building. This additional lease expires on November 30, 2025.

In March 2014, the Company entered into an amendment of its existing lease agreement to expand the rented space from 55,694approximately 56,000 to 75,594approximately 76,000 square feet at 41 Seyon Street, Waltham, Massachusetts. Pursuant to the terms of the amended lease, Repligen leased an additional 19,900 square feet (the “Expansion Space”) for a period of eight years and one month, commencing on August 1, 2014.

The amended lease provides for additional rent expense of approximately $361,000$0.4 million on an annualized basis. The amended lease also requiresrequired an increased security depositincrease to a letter of credit from $200,000$0.2 million to $450,000$0.5 million and continues to require the Company to pay a proportionate share of certain of the landlord’s annual operating costs and real estate taxes. In 2017, the issuing bank no longer required collateral to secure the letter of credit; as a result, the Company released the funds from restricted cash. Future minimum rental commitments under the amended lease as of December 31, 20152018 are $1,371,000$1.4 million for the years ending December 31, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2020, respectively.

In 2007,2021, respectively, $1.3 million for the Company entered into a five-year lease agreement for approximately 2,500 square feet of space in Waltham, Massachusetts to provide for expanded manufacturing operations. Adjacent to this space, the Company entered into a two-year lease in 2008 for approximately 7,350 square feet of additional space to be used for expanded manufacturing and administrative operations. Both of these leases expired onyear ended December 31, 2012. The Company converted to a month-to-month basis2022 and $0.4 million for both sites. The Company terminated the lease onyear ending December 31, 2023 (until May 31, 2023, the 7,350 square feet of space in the first quarter of 2015.

Following the completionexpiration date of the Novozymes Acquisition, thelease).

The Company now leases four adjacent buildings in Lund, Sweden totaling approximately 45,000 square feet of space used primarily for biologics manufacturing and administrative operations. The lease for three buildings totaling approximately 41,000 square feetwas renewed during 2016 and expires on June 30, 2017 whileDecember 31, 2021. Future minimum rental commitments under the amended lease as of December 31, 2018 are $0.9 million for the fourth building with approximately 4,000 square feet of space expires on September 30, 2019.years ending December 31, 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively.

Obligations undernon-cancelable operating leases, including the facility leases discussed above, as of December 31, 20152018 are approximately as follows (in(amounts in thousands):

 

Years Ending

  Operating Leases 

December 31, 2016

  $2,343  

December 31, 2017

   1,888  

December 31, 2018

   1,434  

December 31, 2019

   1,418  

December 31, 2020

   1,371  

Thereafter

   3,043  
  

 

 

 

Minimum lease payments

  $11,497  
  

 

 

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

  Operating Leases 

2019

  $4,021 

2020

   3,599 

2021

   3,263 

2022

   2,213 

2023

   1,316 

2024 and thereafter

   3,622 
  

 

 

 

Minimum operating lease payments

  $18,034 
  

 

 

 

Rent expense charged to operations under operating leases was approximately $2,619,000, $2,735,000$4.4 million, $3.4 million and $2,437,000$2.6 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, the Company had deferred rent liabilities of $1,899,000, $1,956,000$4.1 million, $1.7 million and $2,028,000,$1.8 million, respectively, related to the escalating rent provisions for the Waltham, headquarters.

Massachusetts headquarters and the Company’s facilities in Rancho Dominguez, California and Marlborough, Massachusetts.

Licensing and Research Agreements

The Company licenses certain technologies that are, or may be, incorporated into its technology under several agreements and also has entered into several clinical research agreements which require the Company to fund certain research projects. Generally, the license agreements require the Company to pay annual maintenance fees and royalties on product sales once a product has been established using the technologies. The Company recorded researchResearch and development expenses associated with license agreements of approximately $7,000, $7,000 and $302,000were immaterial amounts for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,2018, 2017 and 2013, respectively.2016.

In October 2009, the CompanySeptember 2018, we entered into an exclusive worldwide commercial licensea collaboration agreement with FamiliesSartorius Stedim Biotech (“SSB”), a leading international supplier for the biopharmaceutical industry, to integrate XCell ATF cell retention control technology into Sartorius’s BIOSTAT® STR large-scale,single-use bioreactors to create novel perfusion-enabled bioreactors. As a result of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (see Note 2). Pursuantthis collaboration,end-users will stand to benefit from a single control system for 50L to 2,000L bioreactors used in perfusion cell culture applications. The single interface is designed to control cell growth, fluid management and cell retention in continuous and intensified bioprocessing and, ultimately, simplify the License Agreement dateddevelopment and manufacture of biotechnological drugs under current good manufacturing practices.

In June 2018, we secured an agreement with Navigo for the exclusiveco-development of multiple affinity ligands for which Repligen holds commercialization rights. We are manufacturing and have agreed to supply the first of these ligands,NGL-ImpactA, exclusively to Purolite Life Sciences (“Purolite”), who will pair our high-performance ligand with Purolite’s agarose jetting base bead technology used in their Jetted A50 Protein A resin product. We also signed a long-term supply agreement with Purolite forNGL-Impact A and other potential additional affinity ligands that may advance from our Navigo collaboration. The Navigo and Purolite agreements are supportive of our strategy to secure and reinforce our proteins business. We made payments to Navigo of $2.4 million in the year ended December 28, 2012, the Company transferred all rights31, 2018 in connection with this program, which are recorded to research and obligations related to the FSMA License Agreement to Pfizer. On January 26, 2015 Pfizer notified us that they were terminating the License Agreement, effective asdevelopment expenses in our consolidated statement of April 26, 2015.operations and comprehensive income.

Purchase Orders, Supply Agreements and Other Contractual Obligations

In the normal course of business, the Company has entered into purchase orders and other agreement with manufacturers, distributors and others. Outstanding obligations at December 31, 20152018 of approximately $5,729,000$29.0 million are expected to be completed within one year.

7.10.Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

Convertible Senior Notes

Prepaid expensesThe carrying value of the Company’s convertible senior notes is as follows:

   December 31, 
   2018   2017 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

2.125% convertible senior notes due 2021:

    

Principal amount

  $114,989   $115,000 

Unamortized debt discount

   (9,781   (13,395

Unamortized debt issuance costs

   (1,720   (2,355
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total convertible senior notes

  $103,488   $99,250 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

On May 24, 2016, the Company issued $115.0 million aggregate principal amount of its Notes. The net proceeds from the sale of the Notes, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and other current assets consistrelated offering expenses, were $111.1 million. The Notes bear interest at the rate of 2.125% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year, beginning December 1, 2016.

The Notes will mature on June 1, 2021, unless earlier repurchased, redeemed or converted in accordance with their terms. Prior to March 1, 2021, the Notes will be convertible at the option of holders of the following (in thousands):

   December 31, 2015   December 31, 2014 

Equipment maintenance and services

  $689    $492  

Prepaid VAT

   558     419  

Prepaid insurance

   455     359  

Vendor credit

   —       486  

Deferred costs

   206     5  

Prepaid taxes

   105     220  

Interest receivable

   63     100  

Other

   22     23  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $2,098    $2,104  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

8.Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plantNotes only upon satisfaction of certain conditions and equipment consistduring certain periods, and thereafter, the Notes will be convertible at any time until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date. Upon conversion, holders of the following (in thousands):Notes will receive shares of the Company’s common stock, cash or a combination thereof, at the Company’s election. It is the Company’s current intent and policy to settle all conversions through combination settlement, which involves satisfying the principal amount outstanding with cash and any note conversion value over the principal amount in shares of the Company’s common stock.

   December 31, 2015   December 31, 2014 

Leasehold improvements

  $13,306    $9,108  

Equipment

   13,758     13,116  

Furniture and fixtures

   2,808     2,270  

Construction in progress

   425     3,848  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total property, plant and equipment

   30,297     28,342  

Less: accumulated depreciation

   (16,496   (13,816
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

  $13,801    $14,526  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Depreciation expense totaled approximately $2,996,000, $2,594,000 and $2,092,000Notes with a par value of $11,000 were submitted for conversion in the fiscal years endedfourth quarter of 2017, and this conversion was settled in the first quarter of 2018. The conversion resulted in the issuance of a nominal-amount of shares of the Company’s common stock, and the Company recorded a loss of $1,000 on the conversion of these Notes.

During the fourth quarter of 2018, the closing price of the Company’s common stock continued to exceed 130% of the conversion price of the Notes for more than 20 trading days of the last 30 consecutive trading days of the quarter. As a result, the Notes are convertible at the option of the holders of the Notes during the first quarter of 2019, the quarter immediately following the quarter when the conditions were met, as stated in the terms of the Notes. These terms have been met each quarter since the second quarter of 2018 and, expecting to continue meeting these terms, the Company reclassified the carrying value of the Notes from long-term liabilities to current liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2018. As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

9.Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist2018, the if- converted value of the Notes exceeded the aggregate principal amount by $69.6 million. As of the date of this filing, no Notes were converted by the holders of such Notes in the first quarter of 2019. In the event the closing price conditions are met in the first quarter of 2019 or a future fiscal quarter, the Notes will be convertible at a holder’s option during the immediately following (in thousands):fiscal quarter.

The conversion rate for the Notes will initially be 31.1813 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of $32.07 per common share, and is subject to adjustment under the terms of the Notes. Holders of the Notes may require the Company to repurchase their Notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change prior to maturity for cash at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the repurchase date.

   December 31, 2015   December 31, 2014 

Employee compensation

  $4,680    $3,759  

Taxes

   166     571  

Current portion of contingent consideration

   4,480     1,135  

Professional fees

   269     511  

Unearned revenue

   258     130  

Other accrued expenses

   2,204     713  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $12,057    $6,819  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Company will not have the right to redeem the Notes prior to June 5, 2019, but may redeem the Notes, at its option, in whole or in part, on any business day on or after June 5, 2019 and prior to the maturity date if the last

reported sale price of the Company’s common stock has been at least 130% of the conversion price then in effect for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during any 30 consecutive trading day period ending on, and including, the trading day immediately preceding the date on which the Company provides written notice of redemption. The redemption price will be equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.

The Notes contain customary terms and events of default. If an event of default (other than certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization involving the Company) occurs and is continuing, the holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Notes may declare 100% of the principal of, and any accrued and unpaid interest on, all of the Notes to be due and payable. Upon the occurrence of certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization involving the Company, 100% of the principal of and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on all of the Notes will become due and payable automatically. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Notes provide that, to the extent the Company elects and for up to 270 days, the sole remedy for an event of default relating to certain failures by the Company to comply with certain reporting covenants consist exclusively of the right to receive additional interest on the Notes. The Company is not aware of any events of default, current events or market conditions that would allow holders to call or convert the Notes as of December 31, 2018.

The cash conversion feature of the Notes required bifurcation from the Notes and was initially accounted for as an equity instrument classified to stockholders’ equity, as the conversion feature was determined to be clearly and closely related to the Company’s stock. Based on market data available for publicly traded, senior, unsecured corporate bonds issued by companies in the same industry and asset base and with similar maturity, the Company estimated the implied interest rate, assuming no conversion option. Assumptions used in the estimate represent what market participants would use in pricing the liability component, including market interest rates, credit standing, and yield curves, all of which are defined as Level 2 observable inputs. The estimated implied interest rate was applied to the Notes, which resulted in a fair value of the liability component of $96.3 million upon issuance, calculated as the present value of implied future payments based on the $115 million aggregate principal amount. The equity component of the Notes was recognized as a debt discount, recorded in additionalpaid-in capital, and represents the difference between the aggregate principal of the Notes and the fair value of the Notes without conversion option on their issuance date. The debt discount is amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over five years, or the life of the Notes. The Company assesses the equity classification of the cash conversion feature quarterly, and it is notre-measured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification.

Interest expense recognized on the Notes in 2018 was $2.4 million, $3.6 million and $0.6 million for the contractual coupon interest, the accretion of the debt discount and the amortization of the debt issuance costs, respectively. Interest expense recognized on the Notes during 2017 includes $2.4 million, $3.4 million and $0.6 million for the contractual coupon interest, the accretion of the debt discount and the amortization of the debt issuance costs, respectively. The effective interest rate on the Notes is 6.6%, which includes the interest on the Notes, amortization of the debt discount and debt issuance costs. As of December 31, 2018, the carrying value of the Notes was $103.5 million and the fair value of the principal was $184.6 million. The fair value of the Notes was determined based on the most recent trade activity of the Notes as of December 31, 2018.

10.11.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 20152018 and 2014 (in thousands):2017:

 

   Unrealized gain (loss)
on investments
  Foreign currency
translation adjustment
  Total 

Balance as of December 31, 2013

  $(5 $2,003   $1,998  

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   (28  (7,743  (7,771
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014

   (33  (5,740  (5,773

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   22    (2,815  (2,793
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2015

  $(11 $(8,555 $(8,566
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustment
   Changes in
Fair Value of
Available-
for-Sale
Investments
   Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Balance as of December 31, 2016

  $(13,744  $(5  $(13,749

Other comprehensive loss

   7,381    5    7,386 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2017

   (6,363   —      (6,363

Other comprehensive loss

   (5,530   —      (5,530
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2018

  $(11,893  $—     $(11,893
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

11.12.

Employee Benefit Plans

In the U.S.,United States, the Repligen Corporation 401(k) Savings and Retirement Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) is a qualified defined contribution plan in accordance with Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. All U.S. employees over the age of 21 are eligible to makepre-tax contributions up to a specified percentage of their compensation. Under the 401(k) Plan, the Company may, but is not obligated to match a portion of the employees’ contributions up to a defined maximum. The match is calculated on a calendar year basis. The Company matched approximately $141,000, $107,000$0.7 million, $0.5 million and $92,000$0.2 million in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

In Sweden, the Company contributes to a government-mandated occupational pension plan that is a qualified defined contribution plan. All employees in Sweden are eligible for this pension plan. The Company pays premiums to a third partythird-party occupational pension specialist who administers the pension plan. These premiums are based on various factors including each employee’s age, salary, employment history and selected benefits in the pension plan. When an employee terminates or retires, these premium payments cease for that employee and the Company has no further pension-related obligations for that employee. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 20142018, 2017 and 2013,2016, the Company contributed approximately $485,000, $493,000$0.6 million, $0.5 million and $437,000,$0.5 million, respectively, to the pension plan.

12.13.

Related Party Transactions

In July 2017, in conjunction with the Spectrum Acquisition, the Board of Directors engaged one of the Company’s independent directors to serve as the chairperson of the Spectrum Integration Committee. In this role, this Director worked directly with the Company’s executive team on general integration strategy and focused on the integration of Spectrum’s operations and commercial organization with the Company. The Company recorded $0.2 million of expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 related to this director’s services.

Additionally, certain facilities leased by Spectrum are owned by the former owner of Spectrum, who currently holds greater than 10% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The lease amounts paid to this shareholder were negotiated in connection with the Spectrum Acquisition. The Company has incurred rent expense totaling $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 related to these leases.

As part of the Spectrum Acquisition, the Company was responsible for filing all tax returns for Spectrum for the period from January 1, 2017 through July 31, 2017, the day before the Spectrum Acquisition. The Company was responsible for collecting any tax refunds from federal and state authorities and remitting these refunds to the former shareholders of Spectrum, including the former owner of Spectrum who currently holds greater than 10% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. During 2018, the Company collected $1.7 million of these tax

refunds, which the Company paid to the Spectrum shareholders during the fourth quarter of 2018, net of $0.2 million of expenses paid by the Company on behalf of Spectrum for tax preparation and other fees.

14.

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

The following table contains consolidated statementssets forth certain unaudited quarterly results of operations for 2018 and 2017. In the opinion of management, this information for eachhas been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and all necessary adjustments, consisting only of the previous eight quarters. The Company believes that the following information reflects all normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation ofhave been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly the quarterly information forwhen read in conjunction with the periods presented.audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form10-K. The quarterly operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of future results for any future period.of operations.

 

  December 31,
2015
  September 30,
2015
  June 30,
2015
  March 31,
2015
  December 31,
2014
  September 30,
2014
  June 30,
2014
  March 31,
2014
 
  (in thousands, except per share amounts) 

Revenue:

        

Product revenue

 $21,449   $19,814   $21,457   $20,816   $15,393   $15,153   $15,551   $14,335  

Royalty and other revenue

  —      —      —      —      1,000    125    —      1,991  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenue

  21,449    19,814    21,457    20,816    16,393    15,278    15,551    16,326  

Operating expenses:

        

Cost of product revenue

  10,148    8,444    8,586    8,073    8,084    6,931    6,671    6,335  

Cost of royalty and other revenue

  —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Research and development

  1,431    1,490    1,252    1,568    1,328    1,650    1,430    1,201  

Selling, general and administrative

  6,473    5,959    6,242    6,024    4,975    4,471    4,326    3,384  

Contingent consideration – fair value adjustments

  1,969    233    768    1,112    1,945    10    18    98  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

  20,021    16,126    16,848    16,777    16,332    13,062    12,445    11,018  

Income from operations

  1,428    3,688    4,609    4,039    61    2,216    3,106    5,308  

Investment income

  44    37    19    36    59    64    85    102  

Interest expense

  (8  (8  (8  (9  (12  (11  (13  (14

Other income (expense)

  (270  (38  (269  132    134    (14  65    2  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

  1,194    3,679    4,351    4,198    242    2,255    3,243    5,398  

Income tax provision

  929    1,141    738    1,269    640    789    418    1,121  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 $265   $2,538   $3,613   $2,929   $(398 $1,466   $2,825   $4,277  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Earnings per share:

        

Basic

 $0.01   $0.08   $0.11   $0.09   $(0.01 $0.04   $0.09   $0.13  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted

 $0.01   $0.08   $0.11   $0.09   $(0.01 $0.04   $0.09   $0.13  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

        

Basic

  32,946    32,925    32,870    32,755    32,747    32,677    32,234    31,963  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted

  33,577    33,690    33,671    33,451    32,747    33,327    33,076    31,855  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 
   Q1   Q2   Q3   Q4 
   (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) 

Revenue

  $44,830   $47,731   $49,529   $51,942 

Gross profit

   25,162    26,643    27,346    28,350 

Operating expenses

   38,854    43,458    41,643    44,089 

Net income

   3,448    2,738    4,794    5,638 

Earnings per share:

        

Basic

  $0.08   $0.06   $0.11   $0.13 

Diluted

  $0.08   $0.06   $0.10   $0.12 
   For the Years Ended December 31, 2017 
   Q1   Q2   Q3   Q4 
   (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) 

Revenue

  $30,590   $32,455   $36,580   $41,611 

Gross profit

   16,600    18,518    16,593    22,475 

Operating expenses

   24,914    26,982    36,986    38,349 

Net income

   3,068    8,438    4,669    12,178 

Earnings per share:

        

Basic

  $0.09   $0.25   $0.11   $0.28 

Diluted

  $0.09   $0.24   $0.11   $0.27 

 

8092