UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM10-K

 

FORM 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to

Commission file number1-13926

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

76-0321760

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

15415 Katy Freeway

Houston, Texas  77094

(Address and zip code of principal executive offices)

(281)492-5300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

Trading Symbol

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share

DO

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of RegulationS-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K.  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ☒

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer  ☐

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging growth company  ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B)13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes  No 

State the aggregate market value of the voting andnon-voting common equity held bynon-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

As of June 30, 2017                                                                         $694,258,330

As of June 28, 2019

$572,749,915

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

As of February 9, 2018    Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share                         137,227,782

As of February 7, 2020

Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share

137,703,910 shares

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the definitive proxy statement relating to the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., which will be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2017,2019, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.



DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

FORM10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 20172019

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., or the Company, filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, or the Original Filing, with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on February 11, 2020. The Company is filing this Amendment No. 1 to the Original Filing solely to correct a typographical error in the Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, or the Opinion, contained in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm included in the Original Filing. The Opinion incorrectly contained several unintended repetitive incomplete sentences due to imbedded underlying metadata that was not removed prior to filing. That error has been corrected in this Amendment No. 1.

In addition, the exhibit list included in Item 15 of Part IV of the Original Filing has been amended to contain a currently-dated consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP and, pursuant to the rules of the SEC, currently-dated certifications from the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Such consent and the certifications of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are attached as exhibits to this Amendment No. 1.

Except as described above, this Amendment No. 1 does not amend or update any other information contained in the Original Filing. The Company has included a complete copy of the Original Filing, as amended per above, in this filing.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Page No.

Cover Page

1

Document Table of Contents

2

Part I

Item 1.

Business

4

Part I

Item 1.

1A.

Business

Risk Factors

2

9

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

7

Item 1B.

1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

19

22

Item 2.

Properties

19

Item 3.

2.

Legal Proceedings

Properties

19

22

Item 4.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

22

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

19

22

Part II

Item 5.5.

Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities

20

23

Item 6.6.

Selected Financial Data

22

24

Item 7.7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations

23

25

Item 7A.7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

44

39

Item 8.8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

46

40

Consolidated Financial Statements

48

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

ConsolidatedFinancialStatements

53

44

Item 9.

NotestoConsolidatedFinancialStatements

49

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure

88

78

Item 9A.

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

88

78

Item 9B.

Other Information

89

Item 9B.

Other Information

79

Part III

Part III

Item 10.10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

89

80

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

89

Item 12.11.

Executive Compensation

80

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters

89

80

Item 13.13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

90

80

Item 14.14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

90

80

Part IV

Item 15.

15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

90

81

Item 16.

Form10-K Summary

93

Signatures

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

94

84

Signatures

85


PART I

Item 1. Business.

General

Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. provides contract drilling services to the energy industry around the globe with a fleet of 1715 offshore drilling rigs, consisting of four drillships and seven ultra-deepwater, four deepwater and11 semisubmersible rigs, including twomid-water semisubmersible rigs. The semisubmersibleOcean Victorywas sold in January 2018 and thejack-upOcean Scepter is rigs that are currently being marketed for sale. Both rigs have been excluded from ourcold stacked. Our current fleet total.excludes the Ocean Confidence, which we expect to complete the sale of in the first quarter of 2020. See “— “– Our FleetFleet Enhancements and AdditionsStatus” and “—“– Our FleetFleet Status.Enhancements.

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this report to “Diamond Offshore,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in 1989.

Our Fleet

Our fleet enables us to offer services in the floater market on a worldwide basis. A floater rig is a type of mobile offshore drilling rig that floats and does not rest on the seafloor. This asset class includes self-propelled drillships and semisubmersible rigs.

Semisubmersible rigs are comprised of an upper working and living deck resting on vertical columns connected to lower hull members. Such rigs operate in a “semi-submerged” position, remaining afloat, off bottom, in a position in which the lower hull is approximately 55 feet to 90 feet below the water line and the upper deck protrudes well above the surface. Semisubmersibles hold position while drilling by use of a series of small propulsion units or thrusters that provide dynamic positioning, or DP, to keep the rig on location, or with anchors tethered to the sea bed. Although DP semisubmersibles are self-propelled, such rigs may be moved long distances with the assistance of tug boats.Non-DP, or moored, semisubmersibles require tug boats or the use of a heavy lift vessel to move between locations.

A drillship is an adaptation of a maritime vessel that is designed and constructed to carry out drilling operations by means of a substructure with a moon pool centrally located in the hull. Drillships are typically self-propelled and are positioned over a drillsite through the use of a DP system similar to those used on semisubmersible rigs.


OurFleet Status

The following table presents additional information regarding our floater fleet (semisubmersibles and drillships) can be further categorized based on the nominal water depth for each class of rig as follows:at February 1, 2020:

 

Rig Type and Name

 

Rated Water

Depth

(in feet)(a)

 

 

Attributes

 

Year Built/

Redelivered (b)

 

Current

Location (c)

 

Customer (d)

DRILLSHIPS (4):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ocean BlackLion

 

 

12,000

 

 

DP; 7R; 15K

 

2015

 

GOM

 

Hess Corporation

Ocean BlackRhino

 

 

12,000

 

 

DP; 7R; 15K

 

2014

 

GOM

 

Hess Corporation

Ocean BlackHornet

 

 

12,000

 

 

DP; 7R; 15K

 

2014

 

GOM

 

Contract Preparation/BP

Ocean BlackHawk

 

 

12,000

 

 

DP; 7R; 15K

 

2014

 

GOM

 

Occidental

SEMISUBMERSIBLES

   (11):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ocean GreatWhite

 

 

10,000

 

 

DP; 6R; 15K

 

2016

 

North Sea/U.K.

 

Actively Marketing/Warm Stacked

Ocean Valor

 

 

10,000

 

 

DP; 6R; 15K

 

2009

 

Brazil

 

Petrobras

Ocean Courage

 

 

10,000

 

 

DP; 6R; 15K

 

2009

 

Brazil

 

Petrobras

Ocean Monarch

 

 

10,000

 

 

15K

 

2008

 

Australia/ Singapore/ Myanmar

 

Demob/Contract Preparation/Posco Daewoo

Ocean Endeavor

 

 

10,000

 

 

15K

 

2007

 

North Sea/U.K.

 

Shell

Ocean Rover

 

 

8,000

 

 

15K

 

2003

 

Malaysia

 

Cold Stacked

Ocean Apex

 

 

6,000

 

 

15K

 

2014

 

Australia

 

Woodside

Ocean Onyx

 

 

6,000

 

 

15K

 

2013

 

Singapore/Australia

 

Contract Preparation/Beach

Ocean America

 

 

5,500

 

 

15K

 

1988

 

Malaysia

 

Cold Stacked

Ocean Valiant

 

 

5,500

 

 

15K

 

1988

 

North Sea/U.K.

 

Shell

Ocean Patriot

 

 

3,000

 

 

15K

 

1983

 

North Sea/U.K.

 

Apache

CategoryAttributes

Rated

Water Depth(a)

(in feet)

Number of Units in Our Fleet

Ultra-DeepwaterDP

=

7,501 to 12,000

Dynamically Positioned/Self-Propelled

7R

  11

=

2 Seven ram blow out preventers

Deepwater6R

=

5,000 to 7,500

Six ram blow out preventer

15K

    4

=

15,000 psi well control system

Mid-Water(a)

400 to 4,999    2

(a)

Rated water depth for semisubmersiblesdrillships and drillshipssemisubmersibles reflects the maximum water depth in which a floating rig has been designed to operate.for drilling operations. However, individual rigs are capable of drilling, or have drilled, in marginally greater water depths depending on various conditions (such as salinity of the ocean, weather and sea conditions).

Fleet Status

The following table presents additional information regarding our floater fleet at January 29, 2018:

Rig Type and Name

  Rated
Water Depth

(in feet)
  

Attributes

 Year Built/
Redelivered (a)
  

Current Location (b)

  

Customer (c)

ULTRA-DEEPWATER:

       

Drillships (4):

       

Ocean BlackLion

   12,000  DP; 7R; 15K  2015  GOM  Hess Corporation

Ocean BlackRhino

   12,000  DP; 7R; 15K  2014  GOM  Hess Corporation

Ocean BlackHornet

   12,000  DP; 7R; 15K  2014  GOM  Anadarko

Ocean BlackHawk

   12,000  DP; 7R; 15K  2014  GOM  Anadarko

Semisubmersibles (7):

       

Ocean GreatWhite

   10,000  DP; 6R; 15K  2016  Malaysia  BP

Ocean Valor

   10,000  DP; 6R; 15K  2009  Brazil  Petrobras

Ocean Courage

   10,000  DP; 6R; 15K  2009  Brazil  Petrobras

Ocean Confidence

   10,000  DP; 6R; 15K  2001/2015  Canary Islands  Cold Stacked

Ocean Monarch

   10,000  15K  2008  Australia  Warm Stacked/Cooper Energy

Ocean Endeavor

   10,000  15K  2007  Italy  Cold Stacked

Ocean Rover

   8,000  15K  2003  Malaysia  Cold Stacked

DEEPWATER:

       

Semisubmersibles (4):

       

Ocean Apex

   6,000  15K  2014  Australia  Woodside Energy

Ocean Onyx

   6,000  15K  2013  Malaysia  Cold Stacked

Ocean America

   5,500  15K  1988  Malaysia  Cold Stacked

Ocean Valiant

   5,500  15K  1988  North Sea/U.K.  Maersk

MID-WATER:

       

Semisubmersibles (2):

       

Ocean Patriot

   3,000  15K  1983  North Sea/U.K.  Shipyard/Shell

Ocean Guardian

   1,500  15K  1985  North Sea/U.K.  Warm Stacked/Decipher Prod Ltd

Attributes

DP    =    Dynamically Positioned/Self-Propelled(b)

  7R    =    2 Seven ram blow out preventers

6R     =    Six ram blow out preventer

15K    =    15,000 psi well control system

(a)Represents year rig was built and originally placed in service or year rig was redelivered with significant enhancements that enabled the rig to be classified within a different floater category than originally constructed.

(b)(c)

GOM means U.S. Gulf of Mexico.

(c)(d)

For ease of presentation in this table, customer names have been shortened or abbreviated. Warm-stacked is used to describe a rig that is idled (not contracted) and maintained in a “ready” state with a full crew to enable the rig to be quickly placed into service when contracted. Cold-stacked is used to describe an idled rig for which steps have been taken to preserve the rig and reduce certain costs, such as crew costs and maintenance expenses. Depending on the amount of time that a rig is cold-stacked, significant expenditures may be required to return the rig to a “ready” state.

Fleet Enhancements

During early 2019, we completed the reactivation of the Ocean Endeavor, which is currently on contract in the United Kingdom, or U.K. We also completed the reactivation and Additions. Ourupgrade of the Ocean Onyx in late 2019. As part of the upgrade of the Ocean Onyx, we increased the rig’s lower deck load capability, reduced rig motion response and made other technologically desirable enhancements sought by our customers. We expect the Ocean Onyx to commence operating under a long-term strategy iscontract in Australia in the second quarter of 2020.  In addition, we added


enhanced automation features on two of our drillships, the Ocean BlackHawk and Ocean BlackHornet, during their 2019 shipyard stays for regulatory surveys.  Similar projects for our other two drillships are scheduled to upgrade our fleet to meet customer demand for advanced, efficient and high-tech rigs by acquiring or building new rigs when possible to do so at attractive prices. Our most recent fleet enhancement cycle wasbe completed in 2016, with the delivery of theOcean GreatWhite.2020.

We continue to evaluate further rig acquisition and enhancement opportunities as they arise. However, we can provide no assurance whether, or to what extent, we will continue to make rig acquisitions or enhancements to our fleet. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Sources and Uses of CashUpgrades and Other Capital Expenditures” in Item 7 of this report.

Pressure Control by the Hour®. In 2016, we launched an initiative to increase the operational efficiency of our rigs by reducing subseanon-productive time, or downtime incurred by a contracted rig due to the performance of routine

maintenance on or failure of subsea equipment, primarily the blowout preventer, or BOP. As part of this initiative, we entered into aten-year collaborative arrangement with a subsidiary of GE Oil & Gas, or GE, to monitor the BOP equipment and proactively manage the maintenance, certification and reliability of such equipment. In connection with the services agreement with GE, we sold the BOP equipment to a GE affiliate and have leased back such equipment under four separateten-year operating leases. Collectively, we refer to the services agreement with GE and the lease agreements with the GE affiliate as the “PCbtH program.” At the end of 2016, all of our drillships were participants in the PCbtH program. Since the fourth quarter of 2016 through the fourth quarter of 2017, the operational efficiency of our drillships has increased from 95.1% to 99.7%.

Markets

The principal markets for our offshore contract drilling services are:

the Gulf of Mexico, including the United States, or U.S., and Mexico;

South America, principally offshore Brazil, and Trinidad and Tobago;

Australia and Southeast Asia, including Malaysia, Indonesia

Australia and Southeast Asia, including Malaysia, Myanmar and Vietnam;

Europe, principally offshore the United Kingdom, or U.K., and Norway;

Europe, principally offshore the U.K.;

East and West Africa; and

the Mediterranean; and

the Middle East.

the Mediterranean.

We actively market our rigs worldwide. From time to time, our fleet operates in various other markets throughout the world. See Note 1716 “Segments and Geographic Area Analysis” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

Offshore Contract Drilling Services

Our contracts to provide offshore drilling services vary in their terms and provisions. We typically obtain our contracts through a competitive bid process, although it is not unusual for us to be awarded drilling contracts following direct negotiations. Our drilling contracts generally provide for a basic dayrate regardless of whether or not drilling results in a productive well. Drilling contracts generally also provide for reductions in rates during periods when the rig is being moved or when drilling operations are interrupted or restricted by equipment breakdowns, adverse weather conditions or other circumstances. Under dayrate contracts, we generally pay the operating expenses of the rig, including wages and the cost of incidental supplies. Historically, dayrate contracts have accounted for the majority of our revenues. In addition, from time to time, our dayrate contracts may also provide for the ability to earn an incentive bonus from our customer based upon performance.

The duration of a dayrate drilling contract is generally tied to the time required to drill a single well or a group of wells, in what we refer to as awell-to-well contract, or a fixed period of time, in what we refer to as a term contract. ManyOur drilling contracts may be terminated by the customer in the event the drilling unit is destroyed or lost, or if drilling operations are suspended for an extended period of time as a result of a breakdown of equipment or, in some cases, due to events beyond the control of either party to the contract. Certain of our contracts also permit the customer to terminate the contract early by giving notice; in most circumstances this requires the payment of an early termination fee by the customer. The contract term in many instances may also be extended by the customer exercising options for the drilling of additional wells or for an additional length of time, generally at competitive market rates andsubject to mutually agreeable terms and rates at the time of the extension. In periods of decreasing demand for offshore rigs, drilling contractors may prefer longer term

contracts to preserve dayrates at existing levels and ensure utilization, while customers may prefer shorter contracts that allow them to more quickly obtain the benefit of declining dayrates. Moreover, drilling contractors may accept lower dayrates in a declining market in order to obtain longer-term contracts and add backlog. See “Risk Factors We may not be able to renew or replace expiring contracts for our rigs” and “Risk Factors Our business involves numerous operating hazards that could expose us to significant losses and significant damage claims. We are not fully insured against all of these risks and our contractual indemnity provisions may not fully protect us,” in Item 1A of this report, which are incorporated herein by reference. For a discussion of our contract backlog, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and


Results of Operations — Market Overview —Contract Drilling BacklogBacklog” in Item 7 of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Customers

We provide offshore drilling services to a customer base that includes major and independent oil and gas companies and government-owned oil companies. During 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, we performed services for 14, 1812, 13 and 1914 different customers, respectively. During 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, our most significant customers were as follows:

 

  Percentage of Annual
Consolidated Revenues
 

 

Percentage of Annual Consolidated

Revenues

 

Customer

      2017         2016         2015     

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Anadarko

   24.9  22.4  12.4

Hess Corporation

 

 

28.9

%

 

 

25.0

%

 

 

16.0

%

Occidental (formerly Anadarko)

 

 

20.6

%

 

 

33.8

%

 

 

24.9

%

Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.

   18.9  17.9  24.1

 

 

19.5

%

 

 

15.8

%

 

 

18.9

%

Hess Corporation

   16.0  7.7  0.3

BP

   15.8  9.0  0.1

 

 

3.1

%

 

 

10.5

%

 

 

15.8

%

ExxonMobil

      5.8  12.4

No other customer accounted for 10% or more of our annual total consolidated revenues during 2017, 20162019, 2018 or 2015.2017. See “Risk Factors —Our industry is highly competitive, with an oversupply of drilling rigs and intense price competition” and “Risk Factors —Our customer base is concentrated”in Item 1A of this report, which are incorporated herein by reference.

As of January 1, 2018,2020, our contract backlog was $2.4an aggregate $1.6 billion attributable to 13 customers. All four of our drillships are currently contracted10 customers, compared to work in the GOM. As$2.0 billion as of January 1, 2018, contract2019.  Of our current contracted backlog for the years 2020, 2021 and 2022, $0.3 billion, $0.2 billion and $0.1 billion, respectively, or 43%, 44% and 24%, respectively, are attributable to our expected operations in the GOM was $653.0 million, $554.0 million and $86.0 million for the years 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively, all of which was attributable to twofrom three customers. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Market Overview —Contract Drilling BacklogBacklog” in Item 7 of this report. See “Risk Factors —We can provide no assurance that our drilling contracts will not be terminated early or that our current backlog of contract drilling revenue will be ultimately realized” in Item 1A of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Competition

Based on industry data, as of the date of this report, there are approximately 800760 mobile drilling rigs (drillships, semisubmersibles and jack-up rigs) in service worldwide, including approximately 260240 floater rigs. Despite consolidation in previous years, the offshore contract drilling industry remains highly competitive with numerous industry participants, none of which at the present time has a dominant market share. Some of our competitors may have greater financial or other resources than we do.

Drilling contracts are traditionally awarded on a competitive bid basis. Price is typically the primary factor in determining which qualified contractor is awarded a job. Customers may also consider rig availability and location, a drilling contractor’s operational and safety performance record, and condition and suitability of equipment. We believe we compete favorably with respect to these factors.

We compete on a worldwide basis, but competition may vary significantly by region at any particular time. See “—Markets.”  Competition for offshore rigs generally takes place on a global basis, as these rigs are highly mobile and may be moved, although at a cost that may be substantial, from one region to another. It is characteristic of the offshore

drilling industry to move rigs from areas of low utilization and dayrates to areas of greater activity and relatively higher dayrates. The current oversupply of offshore drilling rigs also intensifies price competition. See “Risk FactorsOur industry is highly competitive, with an oversupply of drilling rigs and intense price competition” in Item 1A of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Governmental Regulation and Environmental Matters

Our operations are subject to numerous international, foreign, U.S., state and local laws and regulations that relate directly or indirectly to our operations, including regulations controlling the discharge of materials into the environment, requiring removal andclean-up under some circumstances, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, and may include laws or regulations pertaining to climate change, carbon emissions or energy use. See “Risk Factors We are subject to extensive domestic and international laws and regulations that could significantly limit our business activities and revenues and increase our costs” and “Risk Factors – Regulation of greenhouse gases and climate change could have a negative impact on our business” in Item 1A of this report, which are incorporated herein by reference.

Operations Outside the United States

Our operations outside the U.S. accounted for approximately 58%, 66% and 79% of our total consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. See “Risk Factors— Significant portions of our operations are conducted outside the United States and involve additional risks not associatedwith United States domestic operations” and “Risk Factors —We may be required to accrue additional tax liability on certain of our foreign earnings” in Item 1A of this report, which are incorporated herein by reference.

Employees

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had approximately 2,4002,500 workers, including international crew personnel furnished through independent labor contractors.

Information About Our Executive Officers of the Registrant

We have included information on our executive officers in Part I of this report in reliance on General Instruction G(3) to Form10-K. Our executive officers are elected annually by our Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of our Board of Directors until their successors are duly elected and qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal from office. Information with respect to our executive officers is set forth below.

 

Name

Age as of

January 31, 2018

2020

Position

Marc Edwards

57

59

President and Chief Executive Officer and Director

Ronald Woll

52

Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer

David L. Roland

56

58

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Thomas Roth

62

64

Senior Vice President Worldwide Operations

Ronald Woll

50Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer

Scott Kornblau

46

48

Senior Vice President Actingand Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Beth G. Gordon

62

64

Vice President and Controller

Marc Edwards has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a Director since March 2014. Mr. Edwards previously

Ronald Woll has served as a member of theour Executive CommitteeVice President and Chief Commercial Officer since January 1, 2019. Mr. Woll previously served as Senior Vice President of the Completion and Production Division at Halliburton Company, a global diversified oilfield services company,Chief Commercial Officer from January 2010 to February 2014.June 2014 until December 2018.

David L. Rolandhas served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since September 2014. From April 2004 until joining us in 2014, Mr. Roland served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of ION Geophysical Corporation, a NYSE-listed geophysical company.

Thomas Rothhas served as our Senior Vice President Worldwide Operations since December 2016. Mr. Roth previously served as Vice President of the Boots & Coots Product Service Line at Halliburton Company from July 2013 to September 2015. Mr. Roth also served as Boots & Coots Global Operations Manager at Halliburton Company from August 2011 to July 2013.

Ronald WollScott Kornblauhas served as our Senior Vice President and Chief CommercialFinancial Officer since June 2014.July 2018. Mr. WollKornblau previously served as Senior Vice President — Supply Chain at Halliburton Company from January 2011 through June 2014.

Scott Kornblau has served as our Vice President, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since December 2017. Mr. Kornblau previously served as our2017, Vice President and Treasurer sincefrom January 2017 until December 2017 and Treasurer sincefrom July 2007.2007 until January 2017.

Beth G. Gordon has served as our Vice President and Controller since January 2017 and previously served as our Controller since April 2000.

Access to Company Filings

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and accordingly file annual, quarterly and current reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K,


respectively, any amendments to those reports, proxy statements and other information with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. You may read and copy the information we file with the SEC at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference room. Our SEC filings are also available to the public from the SEC’s Internet site at www.sec.gov or from our Internet site at www.diamondoffshore.com. Our website provides a hyperlink to a third-party SEC filings website where these reports may be viewed and printed at no cost as soon as reasonably practicable after we have electronically filed such material with, or furnished it to, the SEC. The preceding Internet addresses and all other Internet addresses referenced in this report are for information purposes only and are not intended to be a hyperlink. Accordingly, no information found or provided at such Internet addresses or at our website in general (or at other websites linked to our website) is intended or deemed to be incorporated by reference in this report.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Our business is subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties. If any of these risks or uncertainties actually occur, our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows, including negative cash flows, prospects and the trading pricesprice of our securities, may be materially and adversely affected. You should carefully consider these risks when evaluating us and our securities. The following is a description of the most significant risks and uncertainties facing us; however, these risks and uncertainties are not the only ones facing our company. We are also subject to a variety of risks that affect many other companies generally, as well as additional risks and uncertainties not known to us or that, as of the date of this report, we believe are not as significant as the risks described below.below, but which may also materially adversely affect our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, including negative cash flows, prospects and the trading price of our securities.

The current protracted downturn in our industry may continue for several more years, and we cannot predict if or when it will end.

Over the past several years, crude oil prices have been volatile, reaching a high of $115 per barrel in 2014, declining to $55 per barrel by the end of 2014 and reaching a low of $28 per barrel during 2016.  Oil prices recovered to nearly $57 per barrel by the end of 2016 and have continued to fluctuate. As of the date of this report, Brent crude oil prices were in the mid-$50-per-barrel range, having started 2020 in the mid-to-upper $60-per-barrel range. As a result of, among other things, this continued volatility in commodity price and its uncertain future, the offshore drilling industry has experienced, and is continuing to experience, a substantial decline in demand for its services, as well as a significant decline in dayrates for contract drilling services. The decline in demand for our contract drilling services and the dayrates for those services has had, and if the industry downturn continues, will continue to have, a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including negative cash flows.  The protracted downturn in our industry will exacerbate many of the other risks included below and other risks that we face, and we cannot predict if or when the downturn will end.

The worldwide demand for drilling services has historically been dependent on the price of oil and, has declined significantly as a result of the decline inlow oil prices, and demand has continued to be depressed in 2017.2019, and there continues a protracted downturn in our industry.

Demand for our drilling services depends in large part upon the oil and natural gas industry’s offshore exploration and production activity and expenditure levels, which are directly affected by oil and gas prices and market expectations of potential changes in oil and gas prices. CommencingBeginning in the second half of 2014, oil prices declined significantly, resulting in a sharp decline in the demand for offshore drilling services, including services that we provide, and materially adversely affecting our results of operations and cash flows in 2015, 2016 and 2017, compared to previous years. Any prolongedyears before the decline. The continuation of low oil prices would have a material adverse effect onmake more severe the downturn in our industry and would continue to materially adversely affect many of our customers and, therefore, on demand for our services and on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including negative cash flows.

Oil prices have been, and are expected to continue to be, volatile and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including:

worldwide supply and demand for oil and gas;

the level of economic activity in energy-consuming markets;

the worldwide economic environment and economic trends, including recessions and the level of international trade activity;

the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, to set and maintain production levels and pricing;

the worldwide economic environment and economic trends, including recessions and the level of international trade activity;

the level of production innon-OPEC countries;

the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, and 10 other oil producing countries, including Russia and Mexico, or OPEC+, to set and maintain production levels and pricing;

civil unrest and the worldwide political and military environment, including uncertainty or instability resulting from an escalation or additional outbreak of armed hostilities involving the Middle East, Russia, otheroil-producing regions or other geographic areas or further acts of terrorism in the United States or elsewhere;

the level of production in non-OPEC+ countries, including U.S. domestic onshore oil production;

the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and delivering oil and gas, both onshore and offshore;

civil unrest and the worldwide political and military environment, including uncertainty or instability resulting from an escalation or additional outbreak of armed hostilities involving the Middle East, Russia, other oil-producing regions or other geographic areas or further acts of terrorism in the U.S. or elsewhere;

the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves;

the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and delivering oil and gas, both onshore and offshore;

the rate of decline of existing and new oil and gas reserves and production;

the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves;

available pipeline and other oil and gas transportation and refining capacity;

the rate of decline of existing and new oil and gas reserves and production;

the ability of oil and gas companies to raise capital;

available pipeline and other oil and gas transportation and refining capacity;

weather conditions, including hurricanes, which can affect oil and gas operations over a wide area;

the ability of oil and gas companies to raise capital;

weather conditions, including hurricanes, which can affect oil and gas operations over a wide area;

natural disasters or incidents resulting from operating hazards inherent in offshore drilling, such as oil spills;

the policies of various governments regarding exploration and development of their oil and gas reserves;

international sanctions on oil-producing countries, or the lifting of such sanctions;

technological advances affecting energy consumption, including development and exploitation of alternative fuels or energy sources;

laws and regulations relating to environmental or energy security matters, including those addressing alternative energy sources or the risks of global climate change;

domestic and foreign tax policy; and

advances in exploration and development technology.

Although, historically, higher sustained commodity prices have generally resulted in increases in offshore drilling such as oil spills;

the policies of various governments regarding exploration and development of their oil and gas reserves;

technological advances affecting energy consumption, including development and exploitation of alternative fuelsprojects, short-term or energy sources;

laws and regulations relating to environmental or energy security matters, including those purporting to address global climate change;

domestic and foreign tax policy; and

advances in exploration and development technology.

An increasetemporary increases in the price of oil and gas will not necessarily result in an increase in offshore drilling activity or an increase in the market demand for our rigs, although, historically, higher commodity prices have generally resulted in increases in offshore drilling projects.rigs. The timing of commitment to offshore activity in a cycle depends on project deployment times, reserve replacement needs, availability of capital and alternative options for resource development.development, among other things. Timing can also be affected by availability, access to, and cost of equipment to perform work.

Our business depends on the level of activity in the offshore oil and gas industry, which has been cyclical, is currently in a protracted downturn and is significantly affected by many factors outside of our control.

Demand for our drilling services depends upon the level of offshore oil and gas exploration, development and production in markets worldwide, and those activities depend in large part on oil and gas prices, worldwide demand for

oil and gas and a variety of political and economic factors. The level of offshore drilling activity is adversely affected when operators reduce or defer new investment in offshore projects, reduce or suspend their drilling budgets or reallocate their drilling budgets away from offshore drilling in favor of other priorities, such as shale or other land-based projects, which couldhave reduced, and may in the future further reduce demand for our rigs. As a result, our business and the oil and gas industry in general are subject to cyclical fluctuations.

As a result of the cyclical fluctuations in the market, there have been periods of lower demand, excess rig supply and lower dayrates, followed by periods of higher demand, shorter rig supply and higher dayrates. We cannot predict the timing or duration of such fluctuations. Periods of lower demand or excess rig supply, which have occurredsuch as the current protracted downturn in the recent pastour industry that is continuing and are continuing,may continue for several more years, intensify the competition in the industry and often result in periods of lower utilization and lower dayrates. During these periods,


our rigs may not be able to obtain contracts for future work and may be idle for long periods of time or may be able to obtain work only under contracts with lower dayrates or less favorable terms. Additionally, prolonged periods of low utilization and dayrates could also(such as we are currently experiencing) have in the past resulted in, and may in the future result in, the recognition of further impairment charges on certain of our drilling rigs if future cash flow estimates, based upon information available to management at the time, indicate that the carrying value of these rigs may not be recoverable. See “—“–We may incur additional asset impairments and/or rig retirements as a result of reduced demand for certain offshore drilling rigs.”

Our industry is highly competitive, with an oversupply of drilling rigs and intense price competition.

The offshore contract drilling industry is highly competitive with numerous industry participants.participants, and such competitiveness may be exacerbated by the current protracted downturn in our industry. Some of our competitors may beare larger companies, have larger or more technologically advanced fleets and have greater financial or other resources than we do. The drilling industry has experienced consolidation in the past and may experience additional consolidation, which could create additional large competitors. Drilling contracts are traditionally awarded on a competitive bid basis. Price is typically the primary factor in determining which qualified contractor is awarded a job; however, rig availability and location, a drilling contractor’s safety record and the quality and technical capability of service and equipment mayare also be considered.

NewAs of the date of this report, there are approximately 240 floater rigs currently available to meet customer drilling needs in the offshore contract drilling market, and many of these rigs are not currently contracted and/or are cold stacked. Although there have been over 135 floater rigs scrapped over the past six years, the market remains oversupplied as new rig construction, and upgrades of existing drilling rigs, cancelation or termination of drilling contracts and established rigs coming off contract have contributed to the current oversupply, of drilling rigs, intensifying price competition. In addition, some shipyards own rigs recently constructed or under construction, which are not currently marketed, which, if acquired by us or our competitors, would further exacerbate the oversupply of rigs.

In addition, during industry downturns like the one we are currently experiencing, rig operators may take lower dayrates and shorter contract durations to keep their rigs operational. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Market Overview in Item 7 of this report.

We can provide no assurance that our drilling contracts will not be terminated early or that our current backlog of contract drilling revenue will be ultimately realized.

Generally, ourOur customers may terminate our drilling contracts under certain circumstances, such as the destruction or loss of a drilling rig, if we suspendour suspension of drilling operations for a specified period of time as a result of a breakdown of major equipment, excessive downtime for repairs, failure to meet minimum performance criteria (including customer acceptance testing) or, in some cases, due to other events beyond the control of either party.

In addition, some of our drilling contracts permit the customer to terminate the contract after specified notice periods, often by tendering contractually specified termination amounts, which may not fully compensate us for the loss of the contract. In some cases, our drilling contracts may permit the customer to terminate the contract without cause, upon little or no notice or without making an early termination payment to us. During depressed market conditions, such as those currently in effect, certain customers have utilized, and may in the future utilize, such contract clauses to seek to renegotiate or terminate a drilling contract or claim that we have breached provisions of our drilling contracts in order to avoid their obligations to us under circumstances where we believe we are in compliance with the contracts. Additionally, because of depressed commodity prices, restricted credit markets, economic downturns, changes in priorities or strategy or other factors beyond our control, a customer may no longer want or need a rig that is currently under contract or may be able to obtain a comparable rig at a lower dayrate. For these reasons, customers have sought and may in the future seek to renegotiate the terms of our existing drilling contracts, terminate our contracts without justification or repudiate or otherwise fail to perform their obligations under our contracts. As a result of such contract renegotiations or terminations, our contract backlog has been and may in the future be adversely impacted. We might not recover any compensation (or any recovery

we obtain may not fully compensate us for the loss of the contract) and we may be required to idle one or more rigs for an extended period of time. Each of these results couldhas had, and may in the future have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. See “— “– Our industry is highly competitive, with an oversupply of


drilling rigs and intense price competition” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Market Overview — Contract Drilling BacklogBacklog” in Item 7 of this this report.

We may not be able to renew or replace expiring contracts for our rigs.

As of the date of this report, all of our current customer contracts will expire between 20182020 and 2020.2023. Two of our contracts expire in 2020, six contracts expire in 2021, and two contracts expire in each of 2022 and 2023. Some of our drilling rigs are not currently contracted for continuous utilization between contracts and are being actively marketed for these uncontracted periods. Our ability to renew or replace expiring contracts or obtain new contracts, and the terms of any such contracts, will depend on various factors, including market conditions and the specific needs of our customers, at such times. Given the historically cyclical and highly competitive nature of our industry and the likelihood that the current protracted downturn in our industry continues, we may not be able to renew or replace the contracts or we may be required to renew or replace expiring contracts or obtain new contracts at dayrates that are below and likely substantially below, existing dayrates, or that have terms that are less favorable to us, including shorter durations, than our existing contracts. Moreover, we may be unable to secure contracts for these rigs. Failure to secure contracts for a rig may result in a decision to cold stack the rig, which puts the rig at risk for impairment and may competitively disadvantage the rig as many customers, during the most recentcurrent protracted market downturn, have expressed a preference for ready or “hot”“warm” stacked rigs over cold-stacked rigs. If a decision is made to cold stack a rig, our operating costs for the rig are typically reduced; however, we will incur additional costs associated with cold stacking the rig (particularly if we cold stack a newer rig, such as a drillship or other DP semisubmersible rig, for which cold-stacking costs are typically substantially higher than for an older non-DP rig). In addition, the costs to reactivate a cold-stacked rig may be substantial. See “– We must make substantial capital and operating expenditures to reactivate, build, maintain and upgrade our drilling fleet.”

We may incur additional asset impairments and/or rig retirements as a result of reduced demand for certain offshore drilling rigs.

The current oversupply of drilling rigs in the offshore drilling market has resulted in numerous rigs being idled and, in some cases, retired and/or scrapped. We evaluate our property and equipment for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, and we couldhave incurred impairment charges in the past, and may incur additional impairment charges in the future related to the carrying value of our drilling rigs. Impairment write-offs could result if, for example, any of our rigs become obsolete or commercially less desirable due to changes in technology, market demand or market expectations or their carrying values become excessive due to the condition of the rig, cold stacking the rig, the expectation of cold stacking the rig in the near future, contracted backlog of less than one year for a rig, a decision to retire or scrap the rig, or spending in excess spending overof budget on anew-build newbuild, construction project or major rig upgrade. We utilize an undiscounted probability-weighted cash flow analysis in testing an asset for potential impairment, reflecting management’s assumptions and estimates regarding the appropriate risk-adjusted dayrate by rig, future industry conditions and operations and other factors. Asset impairment evaluations are, by their nature, highly subjective. The use of different estimates and assumptions could result in materially different carrying values of our assets, which could impact the need to record an impairment charge and the amount of any charge taken. Since 2012, we have retired and sold 2730 drilling rigs (inclusive of the sale of the Ocean Confidence, which is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2020) and recorded impairment losses aggregating $1.7 billion, including $99.3 million recognized in 2017.billion. Historically, the longer a drilling rig remains cold stacked, the higher the cost of reactivation and, depending on the age, technological obsolescence and condition of the rig, the lower the likelihood that the rig will be reactivated at a future date. The current oversupply of rigs in our industry, together with the current protracted downturn, heightens the risk of the need for future rig impairments. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Market Overview —Critical Accounting EstimatesProperty, Plant and Equipment” in Item 7 of this report and Note 23 “Asset Impairments” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

We can provide no assurance that our assumptions and estimates used in our asset impairment evaluations will ultimately be realized or that the current carrying value of our property and equipment including rigs designated as held for sale, will ultimately be realized.

The incurrence of additional asset impairment charges would lower the aggregate carrying value of our rigs and could cause us to breach certain debt covenants under our credit facilities, such as the requirement to maintain a


specified ratio of (A) the aggregate value of certain of our rigs to (B) the aggregate value of substantially all rigs owned by us and the requirement to maintain a specified ratio of (A) the aggregate value of certain of our marketed rigs to (B) the sum of the commitments under our $950 million revolving credit facility, plus certain outstanding loans, letter of credit exposures and other indebtedness.  See “– Our significant debt levels may limit our liquidity and flexibility in obtaining additional financing and in pursuing other business opportunities.”

Our significant debt levels may limit our liquidity and flexibility in obtaining additional financing and in pursuing other business opportunities.

Our business is highly capital intensive and dependent on having sufficient cash flow and/or available sources of financing in order to fund our capital expenditure requirements. During 2019, our cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities decreased an aggregate $300.8 million and during 2018 increased an aggregate $74.0 million. Based on our cash flow forecast, as of the date of this report, we expect to generate aggregate negative cash flows for 2020. If market conditions do not improve, we could continue to generate aggregate negative cash flows in future periods.

As of December 31, 2019, we had outstanding approximately $2.0 billion of senior notes, maturing at various times from 2023 through 2043. As of February 7, 2020, we had no borrowings outstanding under our $225 million revolving credit facility maturing in October 2020, which we may have difficulty replacing upon maturity, or our $950 million revolving credit facility maturing in October 2023 and had utilized $6.0 million for the issuance of a letter of credit under the latter in support of an existing bond. We expect to begin to utilize borrowing under our two credit facilities in the first half of 2020 to meet our liquidity requirements and anticipate ending 2020 with a drawn balance on our $950 million revolving credit facility. At February 7, 2020, we had approximately $1.2 billion available under such credit facilities in the aggregate, subject to their respective terms, to meet our short-term liquidity requirements. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital Resources – Sources and Uses of CashCredit Agreements” in Item 7 of this report and Note 9 “Credit Agreements and Senior Notes” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

Our ability to meet our debt service obligations is dependent upon our future performance, which is unpredictable and dependent on our ability to manage through the current protracted industry downturn. Our levels of indebtedness could have negative consequences to us, including:

we may have difficulty satisfying our obligations with respect to our outstanding debt and, given the challenges to our business presented by the protracted industry downturn, our operational obligations;

we may have difficulty obtaining financing, including refinancing for our existing indebtedness upon maturity, in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes;

we may need to use a substantial portion of our available cash flow from operations to pay interest and principal on our debt, which would reduce the amount of money available to fund working capital requirements, capital expenditures and other general corporate or business activities;

our vulnerability to the effects of general adverse economic conditions, such as the continuing protracted industry downturn, and adverse operating results, including negative cash flows, could increase;

our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and in our industry in general could be limited;

we may not have the ability to pursue business opportunities that become available to us;

our amount of debt and the amount we must pay to service our debt obligations could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and

our customers may react adversely to our significant debt level and seek alternative service providers.


In addition, our failure to comply with the restrictive covenants in our debt instruments could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Among other things, these covenants:

require us to maintain a specified ratio of our consolidated indebtedness to total capitalization;

require us to maintain a specified ratio of (A) the aggregate value of certain of our rigs to (B) the aggregate value of substantially all rigs owned by us;

require us to maintain a specified ratio of (A) the aggregate value of certain of our marketed rigs to (B) the sum of the commitments under our $950 million revolving credit facility, plus certain outstanding loans, letter of credit exposures and other indebtedness;

limit the ability of our subsidiaries to incur debt; and

require us to make a cash collateral deposit if a change in control occurs, as defined in each respective credit facility, within 90 days of the change in control event. The amount of such cash collateral deposit is based on our credit ratings within 90 days of such change in control event. See “–We are controlled by a single stockholder, which could result in potential conflicts of interest.”

In September 2019, S&P Global Ratings, or S&P, downgraded our corporate and senior unsecured notes credit ratings to CCC+ from B. The rating outlook from S&P changed to stable from negative. Our current corporate credit rating from Moody’s Investor Services, or Moody’s, is B2 and our current senior unsecured notes credit rating from Moody’s is B3. The rating outlook from Moody’s is negative. These credit ratings are below investment grade and could raise our cost of financing. Consequently, we may not be able to issue additional debt in amounts and/or with terms that we consider to be reasonable. These ratings could limit our ability to pursue other business opportunities or to refinance our indebtedness as it matures.

Our revolving credit facilities bear interest at variable rates, based on our corporate credit rating and market interest rates. If market interest rates increase, our cost to borrow under our revolving credit facilities may also increase. Although we may employ hedging strategies such that a portion of the aggregate principal amount outstanding under our credit facilities would effectively carry a fixed rate of interest, any hedging arrangement put in place may not offer complete protection from this risk.

Changes in tax laws and policies, effective income tax rates or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our tax returns could adversely affect our financial results.

Tax laws and regulations are highly complex and subject to interpretation and disputes. We conduct our worldwide operations through various subsidiaries in a number of countries throughout the world. As a result, we are subject to highly complex tax laws, regulations and income tax treaties within and between the countries in which we operate as well as countries in which we may be resident, which may change and are subject to interpretation. In addition, in several of the international locations in which we operate, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries enter into agreements with each other to provide specialized services and equipment in support of our foreign operations. In such cases, we apply an intercompany transfer pricing methodology to determine the arm’s length amount to be charged for providing the services and equipment. In most cases, there are alternative transfer pricing methodologies that could be applied to these transactions and, if applied, could result in different chargeable amounts.

As a result, we determine our income tax expense based on our interpretation of the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect in each jurisdiction for the period during which we operate and earn income. Our overall effective tax rate could be adversely affected by lower than anticipated earnings in countries where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated earnings in countries where we have higher statutory rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities or by changes in tax laws, tax treaties, regulations, accounting principles or interpretations thereof in one or more countries in which we operate. In addition, changes in laws, treaties and regulations and the interpretation of such laws, treaties and regulations may put us at risk for future tax assessments and liabilities which could be substantial.


Our income tax returns are subject to review and examination. We recognize the benefit of income tax positions we believe are more likely than not to be sustained on their merit should they be challenged by a tax authority. If any tax authority successfully challenges any tax position taken or any of our intercompany transfer pricing policies, or if the terms of certain income tax treaties are interpreted in a manner that is adverse to us or our operations, or if we lose a material tax dispute in any country, our effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings could increase substantially.

Our consolidated effective income tax rate may vary substantially from one reporting period to another.

Our consolidated effective income tax rate is impacted by the mix between our domestic and international pre-tax earnings or losses, as well as the mix of the international tax jurisdictions in which we operate. We cannot provide any assurance as to what our consolidated effective income tax rate will be in the future due to, among other factors, uncertainty regarding the nature and extent of our business activities in any particular jurisdiction in the future and the tax laws of such jurisdictions, as well as potential changes in U.S. and foreign tax laws, regulations or treaties or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, changes in the administrative practices and precedents of tax authorities or any reclassification or other matter (such as changes in applicable accounting rules) that increases the amounts we have provided for income taxes or deferred tax assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. This variability may cause our consolidated effective income tax rate to vary substantially from one reporting period to another.

Our customer base is concentrated.

We provide offshore drilling services to a customer base that includes major and independent oil and gas companies and government-owned oil companies. During 2017,2019, two of our customers in the GOM and our three largest customers in the aggregate accounted for 41%50% and 60%69%, respectively, of our annual total consolidated revenues. In addition, the number of customers we have performed services for has declined from 35 in 2014 to 1412 in 2017.2019. As of January 1, 2020, our contracted backlog was an aggregate $1.6 billion of which 43%, 44% and 24% for the years 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively, was attributable to our operations in the GOM from three customers. The loss of a significant

customer could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, especially in a declining market (like the current protracted industry downturn) where the number of our working drilling rigs is declining along with the number of our active customers. In addition, if a significant customer experiences liquidity constraints or other financial difficulties, or elects to terminate one of our drilling contracts, it could materially adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our utilization rates in the affected market and also displace demand for our other drilling rigs as the resulting excess supply enters the market. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Market Overview —Contract Drilling BacklogBacklog” in Item 7 of this report.

We may be subject to litigation and disputes that could have a material adverse effect on us.

We are, from time to time, involved in litigation and disputes. These matters may include, among other things, contract disputes, personal injury claims, environmental claims or proceedings, asbestos and other toxic tort claims, employment and tax matters, claims of infringement of patent and other intellectual property rights, and other litigation that arises in the ordinary course of our business. Although we intend to defend these matters vigorously, weWe cannot predict with certainty the outcome or effect of any dispute, claim or other litigation matter, and there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of any litigation. We may not have insurance for litigation or claims that may arise, or if we do have insurance coverage it may not be sufficient, insurers may not remain solvent, other claims may exhaust some or all of the insurance available to us or insurers may interpret our insurance policies such that they do not cover losses for which we make claims or may otherwise dispute claims made. Litigation may have a material adverse effect on us because of potential adverse outcomes, defense costs, the diversion of our management’s resources and other risk factors inherent in litigation or relating to the claims that may arise.

Our contract drilling expense includes fixed costs that will not decline in proportion to decreases in rig utilization and dayrates.

Our contract drilling expense includes all direct and indirect costs associated with the operation, maintenance and support of our drilling equipment, which is often not affected by changes in dayrates and utilization. During


periods of reduced revenue and/or activity (like the current protracted industry downturn), certain of our fixed costs will not decline and often we may incur additional operating costs, such as fuel and catering costs, for which we arethe customer generally reimbursed by the customerreimburses us when a rig is under contract. During times of reduced dayrates and utilization, like the current protracted industry downturn, reductions in costs may not be immediate as we may incur additional costs associated with cold stacking a rig (particularly if we cold stack a newer rig, such as a drillship or other DP semisubmersible rig, for which cold-stacking costs are typically substantially higher than for an older floaternon-DP rig), or we may not be able to fully reduce the cost of our support operations in a particular geographic region due to the need to support the remaining drilling rigs in that region. Accordingly, a decline in revenue due to lower dayrates and/or utilization may not be offset by a corresponding decrease in contract drilling expense.

Contracts for our drilling rigs are generally fixed dayrate contracts, and increases in our operating costs could adversely affect our profitability on those contracts.

Our contracts for our drilling rigs generally provide for the payment of an agreed dayrate per rig operating day, although some contracts do provide for a limited escalation in dayrate due to increased operating costs we incur on the project. ManyOver the term of a drilling contract, our operating costs such as labor costs, are unpredictable and may fluctuate based ondue to events beyond our control. In addition, equipment repair and maintenance expenses vary depending on the type of activity the rig is performing, the age and condition of the equipment and general market factors impacting relevant parts, components and services. The gross margin that we realize on these fixed dayrate contracts will fluctuate based on variations in our operating costs over the terms of the contracts. In addition, for contracts with dayrate escalation clauses, we may not be able to fully recover increased or unforeseen costs from our customers.

Changes in tax laws, effective income tax rates or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our tax returns could adversely affect our financial results.

Tax laws and regulations are highly complex and subject to interpretation and disputes. We conduct our worldwide operations through various subsidiaries in a number of countries throughout the world. As a result, we are subject to

highly complex tax laws, regulations and income tax treaties within and between the countries in which we operate as well as countries in which we may be resident, which may change and are subject to interpretation. We determine our income tax expense based on our interpretation of the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect in each jurisdiction for the period during which we operate and earn income. Our overall effective tax rate could be adversely and suddenly affected by lower than anticipated earnings in countries where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated earnings in countries where we have higher statutory rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities or by changes in tax law, tax treaties, regulations, accounting principles or interpretations thereof in one or more countries in which we operate. In addition, changes in laws, treaties and regulations and the interpretation of such laws, treaties and regulations may put us at risk for future tax assessments and liabilities which could be substantial.

Our income tax returns are subject to review and examination. We do not recognize the benefit of income tax positions we believe are more likely than not to be disallowed upon challenge by a tax authority. If any tax authority successfully challenges any tax position taken or intercompany pricing policies, or if the terms of certain income tax treaties are interpreted in a manner that is adverse to us or our operations, or if we lose a material tax dispute in any country, our effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings could increase substantially.

We are subject to extensive domestic and international laws and regulations that could significantly limit our business activities and revenues and increase our costs.

Certain countries are subject to restrictions, sanctions and embargoes imposed by the United StatesU.S. government or other governmental or international authorities. These restrictions, sanctions and embargoes may prohibit or limit us from participating in certain business activities in those countries. Our operations are also subject to numerous local, state and federal laws and regulations in the United StatesU.S. and in foreign jurisdictions concerning the containment and disposal of hazardous materials, the remediation of contaminated properties and the protection of the environment. Laws and regulations protecting the environment have become increasingly stringent, and may in some cases impose “strict liability,” rendering a person liable for environmental damage without regard to negligence or fault on the part of that person. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations could subject us to civil or criminal enforcement action, for which we may not receive contractual indemnification or have insurance coverage, and could result in the issuance of injunctions restricting some or all of our activities in the affected areas. We may be required to make significant expenditures for additional capital equipment or inspections and recertifications thereof to comply with existing or new governmental laws and regulations. It is also possible that these laws and regulations may in the future add significantly to our operating costs or result in a substantial reduction in revenues associated with downtime required to install such equipment or may otherwise significantly limit drilling activity.

In addition, our operating income is negatively impacted when wethese laws and regulations require us to perform certain regulatory inspections, which we refer to as a special survey, thatsurvey. For most of our rigs, these special surveys are due every five years, for most of our rigs. Thealthough the inspection interval for our North Sea rigs istwo-and-one-half years. Our operating income is negatively impacted during these special surveys. These special surveys are generally performed in a shipyard and require scheduled downtime, which can negatively impact operating revenue. Operating expenses increase as a result of these special surveys due to the cost to mobilize the rigs to a shipyard, and inspection, repair and maintenance costs. Repair and maintenance activities may result from the special survey or may have been previously planned to take place during this mandatory downtime. The number of rigs undergoing a special survey will vary from year to year, as well as from quarter to quarter. Operating income may also be negatively impacted by intermediate surveys, which are performed at interim periods between special surveys. Although an intermediate survey normally does not require shipyard time, the survey may require some downtime for the rig. We can provide no assurance as to the exact timing and/or duration of downtime and/or the costs or lost revenues associated with regulatory inspections, planned rig mobilizations and other shipyard projects.

In addition, the offshore drilling industry is dependent on demand for services from the oil and gas exploration industry and, accordingly, can be affected by changes in tax and other laws relating to the energy business generally.


Governments in some countries are increasingly active in regulating and controlling the ownership of concessions, the exploration for oil and gas and other aspects of the oil and gas industry. The modification of existing laws or regulations or

the adoption of new laws or regulations curtailing exploratory or developmental drilling for oil and gas for economic, environmental or other reasons could limit drilling opportunities.

U.S. federal, and state, foreign and international laws and regulations address oil spill prevention and control and impose a variety of obligations on us related to the prevention of oil spills and liability for damages resulting from such spills. Some of these laws and regulations have significantly expanded liability exposure across all segments of the oil and gas industry. For example, the United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990 imposes strict and, with limited exceptions, joint and several liability upon each responsible party for oil removal costs and a variety of public and private damages. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations could subject us to civil or criminal enforcement action, for which we may not receive contractual indemnification or have insurance coverage, and could result in the issuance of injunctions restricting some or all of our activities in the affected areas. In addition, legislative and regulatory developments may occur that could substantially increase our exposure to liabilities that might arise in connection with our operations.

Regulation of greenhouse gases and climate change could have a negative impact on our business.

Governments around the world are also increasingly considering and adopting laws and regulations to address climate change issues. Lawmakers and regulators in the United StatesU.S. and other jurisdictions where we operate have focused increasingly on restricting the emission of carbon dioxide, methane and other “greenhouse” gases. This may result in new environmental regulations that may unfavorably impact us, our suppliers and our customers. Moreover, there is increased focus, including by governmental and non-governmental organizations, investors and other stakeholders on these and other sustainability matters. In addition, efforts have been made and continue to be made in the international community toward the adoption of international treaties or protocols that would address global climate change issues and impose reductions of hydrocarbon-based fuels. We may be exposed to risks related to new laws, regulations, treaties or international agreements pertaining to climate change, greenhouse gases, carbon emissions or energy use that could decrease the use of oil or natural gas, thus reducing demand for hydrocarbon-based fuel and our drilling services. Governments may also pass laws or regulations incentivizing or mandating the use of alternative energy sources, such as wind power and solar energy, which may reduce demand for oil and natural gas and our drilling services. Such laws, regulations, treaties or international agreements could result in increased compliance costs or additional operating restrictions, or adversely affect the demand for hydrocarbons, which may have a negative impact on our business, and could materially adversely affect our operations by limiting drilling opportunities.

If we, or our customers, are unable to acquire or renew permits and approvals required for drilling operations, we may be forced to delay, suspend or cease our operations.

Oil and natural gas exploration and production operations require numerous permits and approvals for us and our customers from governmental agencies in the areas in which we operate or expect to operate. Depending on the area of operation, the burden of obtaining such permits and approvals to commence such operations may reside with us, our customers or both. Obtaining all necessary permits and approvals may necessitate substantial expenditures to comply with the requirements of these permits and approvals, future changes to these permits or approvals, or any adverse change in the interpretation of existing permits and approvals. In addition, such regulatory requirements and restrictions could also delay or curtail our operations.

Our business involves numerous operating hazards that could expose us to significant losses and significant damage claims. We are not fully insured against all of these risks and our contractual indemnity provisions may not fully protect us.

Our operations are subject to the significant hazards inherent in drilling for oil and gas offshore, such as blowouts, reservoir damage, loss of production, loss of well control, unstable or faulty sea floor conditions, fires and natural disasters such as hurricanes. The occurrence of any of these types of events could result in the suspension of drilling operations, damage to or destruction of the equipment involved and injury or death to rig personnel and damage to producing or potentially productive oil and gas formations, oil spillage, oil leaks, well blowouts and extensive uncontrolled fires, any of which could cause significant environmental damage. In addition, offshore drilling operations


are subject to marine hazards, including capsizing, grounding, collision and loss or damage from severe weather. Operations also may be suspended because of machinery breakdowns, abnormal drilling conditions, failure of suppliers or subcontractors to perform or supply goods or services or personnel shortages. Any of the foregoing events could result in significant damage or loss to our properties and assets or the properties and assets of others, injury or death to rig personnel or others, significant loss of revenues and significant damage claims against us.

Our drilling contracts with our customers provide for varying levels of indemnity and allocation of liabilities between our customers and us with respect to the hazards and risks inherent in, and damages or losses arising out of, our

operations, and we may not be fully protected. Our contracts are individually negotiated, and the levels of indemnity and allocation of liabilities in them can vary from contract to contract depending on market conditions, particular customer requirements and other factors existing at the time a contract is negotiated. We may incur liability for significant losses or damages under such provisions.

Additionally, the enforceability of indemnification provisions in our contracts may be limited or prohibited by applicable law or such provisions may not be enforced by courts having jurisdiction, and we could be held liable for substantial losses or damages and for fines and penalties imposed by regulatory authorities. The indemnification provisions in our contracts may be subject to differing interpretations, and the laws or courts of certain jurisdictions may enforce such provisions while other laws or courts may find them to be unenforceable. The law with respect to the enforceability of indemnities varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and is unsettled under certain laws that are applicable to our contracts. There can be no assurance that our contracts with our customers, suppliers and subcontractors will fully protect us against all hazards and risks inherent in our operations. There can also be no assurance that those parties with contractual obligations to indemnify us will be financially able to do so or will otherwise honor their contractual obligations.

We maintain liability insurance, which generally includes coverage for environmental damage; however, because of contractual provisions and policy limits, our insurance coverage may not adequately cover our losses and claim costs. In addition, certain risks and contingencies related to pollution, reservoir damage and environmental risks are generally not fully insurable. Also, we do not typically purchaseloss-of-hire insurance to cover lost revenues when a rig is unable to work.  There can be no assurance that we will continue to carry the insurance we currently maintain, that our insurance will cover all types of losses or that we will be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at rates we consider to be reasonable or that we will be able to obtain insurance against some risks.

We are self-insured for physical damage to rigs and equipment caused by named windstorms in the GOM. This results in a higher risk of material losses that are not covered by third party insurance contracts. In addition, certain of our shore-based facilities are located in geographic regions that are susceptible to damage or disruption from hurricanes and other weather events. Future hurricanes or similar natural disasters that impact our facilities, our personnel located at those facilities or our ongoing operations may negatively affect our financial position and operating results.

If an accident or other event occurs that exceeds our insurance coverage limits or is not an insurable event under our insurance policies, or is not fully covered by contractual indemnity, it could result in a significant loss to us.

We must make substantial capital and operating expenditures to reactivate, build, maintain and upgrade our drilling fleet.

Our business is highly capital intensive and dependent on having sufficient cash flow and/or available sources of financing in order to fund our capital expenditure requirements. Our expenditures could increase as a result of changes in offshore drilling technology; the cost of labor and materials; customer requirements; the cost of replacement parts for existing drilling rigs; the geographic location of the rigs; and industry standards. Changes in offshore drilling technology, customer requirements for new or upgraded equipment and competition within our industry may require us to make significant capital expenditures in order to maintain our competitiveness. In addition, changes in governmental regulations, safety or other equipment standards, as well as compliance with standards imposed by maritime self-regulatory organizations, may require us to make additional unforeseen capital expenditures. As a result, we may be required to take our rigs out of service for extended periods of time, with corresponding losses of revenues, in order to make such alterations or to add such equipment. Depending on the length of time that a rig has been cold-stacked, we may incur significant costs to restore the rig to drilling capability,


which may also include capital expenditures due to the possible technological obsolescence of the rig. Market conditions, such as the current protracted industry downturn, may not justify these expenditures or enable us to operate our older rigs profitably during the remainder of their economic lives. We can provide no assurance that we will have access to adequate or economical sources of capital to fund our capital and operating expenditures.

Significant portions of our operations are conducted outside the United StatesU.S. and involve additional risks not associated with United StatesU.S. domestic operations.

Our operations outside the United StatesU.S. accounted for approximately 58%47%, 66%41% and 79%58% of our total consolidated revenues for 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively, and include, or have included, operations in South America, Australia and Southeast Asia, Europe East and West Africa, the Mediterranean and Mexico. Because we operate in various regions throughout the world, we are exposed to a variety of risks inherent in international operations, including risks of war or conflicts; political and economic instability and disruption; civil disturbance; acts of piracy, terrorism or other assaults on property or personnel; corruption; possible economic and legal sanctions (such as possible restrictions against countries that the U.S. government may consider to be state sponsors of terrorism); changes in global monetary and trade policies, laws and regulations; fluctuations in currency exchange rates; restrictions on currency exchange; controls over the repatriation of income or capital; and other risks. We may not have insurance coverage for these risks, or we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage for such events at reasonable rates. Our operations may become restricted, disrupted or prohibited in any country in which any of these risks occur.

On January 29, 2020, the European Parliament approved the U.K.’s withdrawal from the European Union, commonly referred to as Brexit. The U.K. officially left the European Union on January 31, 2020. Following its departure, the U.K. entered into a transition period that is scheduled to last until December 31, 2020 during which period of time the U.K.’s trading relationship with the European Union is expected to remain largely the same while the two parties negotiate a trade agreement as well as other aspects of the U.K.’s relationship with the European Union. The impact of Brexit and the future relationship between the U.K. and the European Union are uncertain for companies that do business in the U.K. and the overall global economy. Approximately 17% of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019 were generated in the U.K. Brexit, or similar events in other jurisdictions, could depress economic activity or impact global markets, including foreign exchange and securities markets, which may have an adverse impact on our business and operations as a result of changes in currency exchange rates, tariffs, treaties and other regulatory matters.

We are also subject to the following risks in connection with our international operations:

kidnapping of personnel;

seizure, expropriation, nationalization, deprivation, malicious damage or other loss of possession or use of property or equipment;

renegotiation or nullification of existing contracts;

seizure, expropriation, nationalization, deprivation, malicious damage or other loss of possession or use of property or equipment;

disputes and legal proceedings in international jurisdictions;

renegotiation or nullification of existing contracts;

changing social, political and economic conditions;

disputes and legal proceedings in international jurisdictions;

imposition of wage and price controls, trade barriers, export controls or import-export quotas;

changing social, political and economic conditions;

difficulties in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods;

imposition of wage and price controls, trade barriers, export controls or import-export quotas;

fluctuations in currency exchange rates and restrictions on currency exchange;

difficulties in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods;

regulatory or financial requirements to comply with foreign bureaucratic actions;

fluctuations in currency exchange rates and restrictions on currency exchange;

restriction or disruption of business activities;

regulatory or financial requirements to comply with foreign bureaucratic actions;

limitation of our access to markets for periods of time;

restriction or disruption of business activities;

travel limitations or operational problems caused by public health threats or changes in immigration policies;

limitation of our access to markets for periods of time;

difficulties in supplying, repairing or replacing equipment or transporting personnel in remote locations;

travel limitations or operational problems caused by public health threats or changes in immigration policies;

difficulties in supplying, repairing or replacing equipment or transporting personnel in remote locations;

difficulties in obtaining visas or work permits for our employees on a timely basis; and

difficulties in obtaining visas or work permits for our employees on a timely basis; and

changing taxation policies and confiscatory or discriminatory taxation.

We are also subject to the regulations of the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and other U.S. laws and regulations governing our international operations in addition to domestic and international anti-bribery laws and sanctions, trade laws and regulations, customs laws and regulations, and other restrictions imposed by other governmental or international authorities. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in criminal and civil penalties, economic sanctions, seizure of shipments and/or the contractual withholding of monies owed to us, among other things. We have operated and may in the future operate in parts of the world where strict compliance with anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Any failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 or other anti-corruption laws due to our own acts or omissions or the acts or omissions of others, including our partners, agents or vendors, could subject us to substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties and curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions. In addition, international contract drilling operations are subject to various laws and regulations in countries in which we operate, including laws and regulations relating to the equipping and operation of drilling rigs; import-export quotas or other trade barriers; repatriation of foreign earnings or capital; oil and gas exploration and development; local content requirements; taxation of offshore earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel; and use and compensation of local employees and suppliers by foreign contractors.

Any significant cyber attack or other interruption in network security or the operation of critical information technology systems could materially disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business.

Our consolidated effective income tax ratebusiness has become increasingly dependent upon information technologies, computer systems and networks, including those maintained by us and those maintained and provided to us by third parties (for example, “software-as-a-service” and cloud solutions), to conduct day-to-day operations, and we are placing greater reliance on information technology to help support our operations and increase efficiency in our business functions. We are dependent upon our information technology and infrastructure, including operational and financial computer systems, to process the data necessary to conduct almost all aspects of our business. Computer, telecommunications and other business facilities and systems could become unavailable or impaired from a variety of causes including, among others, storms and other natural disasters, terrorist attacks, utility outages, theft, design defects, human error or complications encountered as existing systems are maintained, repaired, replaced or upgraded. It has been reported that known or unknown entities or groups have mounted so-called “cyber attacks” on businesses and other organizations solely to disable or disrupt computer systems, disrupt operations and, in some cases, steal data. In addition, the U.S. government has issued public warnings that indicate that energy assets might be specific targets of cybersecurity threats. Cybersecurity risks and threats continue to grow and may vary substantially from one reporting periodbe difficult to another.

Our consolidated effective income tax rate is impactedanticipate, prevent, discover or mitigate. A breach, failure or circumvention of our computer systems or networks, or those of our customers, vendors or others with whom we do business, including by the mix betweenransomware or other attacks, could materially disrupt our domesticbusiness operations and internationalpre-tax earnings or losses, as well as the mix of the international tax jurisdictions in which we operate. We cannot provide any assurances as to what our consolidated effective income tax rate will becustomers’ operations and could result in the future duealteration, loss, theft or corruption of data, and unauthorized release of, unauthorized access to, amongor our loss of access to confidential, proprietary, sensitive or other factors, uncertainty regarding the nature and extent ofcritical data or systems concerning our company, business activities, employees, customers or vendors. Any such breach, failure or circumvention could result in any particular jurisdiction in the futureloss of customers, financial losses, regulatory fines, substantial damage to property, bodily injury or loss of life, or misuse or corruption of critical data and the tax laws of such jurisdictions, as well as potential changes in U.S.proprietary information and foreign tax laws, regulationscould have a material adverse effect on our operations, business or treaties or the

reputation.

interpretation or enforcement thereof, changes in the administrative practices and precedents of tax authorities or any reclassification or other matter (such as changes in applicable accounting rules) that increases the amounts we have provided for income taxes or deferred tax assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. This variability may cause our consolidated effective income tax rate to vary substantially from one reporting period to another.

We may be required to accrue additional tax liability on certain of our foreign earnings.

Certain of our international rigs are owned and operated, directly or indirectly, by Diamond Foreign Asset Company, or DFAC, a Cayman Islands subsidiary that we own. It is our intention to continue to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of DFAC and its foreign subsidiaries to finance our foreign activities. We do not expect to provide for U.S. taxes on any earnings generated by DFAC and its foreign subsidiaries, except to the extent that these earnings are immediately subjected to U. S. federal income tax (such as under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017). Should a future distribution be made from any unremitted earnings of this subsidiary, we may be required to record additional U.S. income taxes and/or withholding taxes in certain jurisdictions; however, it is not practical to estimate this potential liability.

Acts of terrorism, piracy and political and social unrest could affect the markets for drilling services, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Acts of terrorism and social unrest, brought about by world political events or otherwise, have caused instability in the world’s financial and insurance markets in the past and may occur in the future. Such acts could be directed against companies such as ours. In addition, acts of terrorism, piracy and social unrest could lead to increased volatility in prices for crude oil and natural gas and could adversely affect the market for offshore drilling services. Insurance premiums could increase and coverage may be unavailable in the future. Government regulations may effectively preclude us from engaging in business activities in certain countries. These regulations could be amended to cover countries where we currently operate or where we may wish to operate in the future.


Although we have paid cash dividends in the past, we did not pay any dividends in 2017 and we may not pay dividends in the future, and we can give no assurance as to the amount or timing of the payment of any future dividends.

We pay dividends at the discretion of our Board of Directors, or Board. Any determination to declare a dividend, as well as the amount of any dividend that may be declared, will be based on the Board’s consideration of our financial position, earnings, earnings outlook, capital spending plans, outlook on current and future market conditions and business needs and other factors that our Board considers relevant at that time. The Board’s dividend policy may change from time to time, but there can be no assurance that we will declare any cash dividends at all or in any particular amounts. See “Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Dividend Policy” in Item 5 of this report and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Item 7 of this report.

We rely on third-party suppliers, manufacturers and service providers to secure and service equipment, components and parts used in rig operations, conversions, upgrades and construction.

Our reliance on third-party suppliers, manufacturers and service providers to provide equipment and services exposes us to volatility in the quality, price and availability of such items. Certain components, parts and equipment that we use in our operations may be available only from a small number of suppliers, manufacturers or service providers. The failure of one or more third-party suppliers, manufacturers or service providers to provide equipment, components, parts or services, whether due to capacity constraints, production or delivery disruptions, price increases, quality control issues, recalls or other decreased availability of parts and equipment, is beyond our control and could materially disrupt our operations or result in the delay, renegotiation or cancellation of drilling contracts, thereby causing a loss of contract drilling backlog and/or revenue to us, as well as an increase in operating costs and an increased risk of additional asset impairments.

Additionally, our suppliers, manufacturers and service providers could be negatively impacted by the current protracted industry conditionsdownturn or global economic conditions. If certain of our suppliers, manufacturers or service providers were to experience significant cash flow issues, become insolvent or otherwise curtail or discontinue their business as a result of such conditions, it could result in a reduction or interruption in supplies, equipment or services available to us and/or a significant increase in the price of such supplies, equipment and services.services,.

We must make substantial capital and operating expenditures to build, maintain, and upgrade our drilling fleet.

Our business is highly capital intensive and dependent on having sufficient cash flow and/or available sources of financing in order to fund our desired capital expenditure requirements. Our expenditures could increase as a result of changes in offshore drilling technology; the cost of labor and materials; customer requirements; the cost of replacement parts for existing drilling rigs; and industry standards. Changes in offshore drilling technology, customeraccounting principles and financial reporting requirements for newcould adversely affect our results of operations or upgraded equipment and competition within our industry may require us to make significant capital expenditures in order to maintain our competitiveness. In addition, changes in governmental regulations, safety or other equipment standards, as well as compliance with standards imposed by maritime self-regulatory organizations, may require us to make additional unforeseen capital expenditures. As a result, we may befinancial condition.

We are required to takeprepare our rigs out of service for extended periods of time,financial statements in accordance with corresponding losses of revenues,accounting principles generally accepted in order to make such alterationsthe U.S., or to add such equipment. We can provide no assuranceGAAP, as promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. It is possible that future accounting standards that we will have accessare required to adequate or economical sources of capital to fund our capital expenditures.

Our debt levels may limit our liquidity and flexibility in obtaining additional financing and in pursuing other business opportunities.

Our business is highly capital intensive and dependent on having sufficient cash flow and/or available sources of financing in order to fund our capital expenditure requirements. As of December 31, 2017,adopt could change the current accounting treatment that we had outstanding approximately $2.0 billion of senior notes, maturing at various times from 2023 through 2043. As of February 9, 2018, we had no borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility and $1.5 billion available under our credit facility to meet our short-term liquidity requirements. We may incur additional indebtedness in the future and borrow from time to time under our revolving credit facility to fund working capital or other needs, subject to compliance with its covenants.

Our ability to meet our debt service obligations is dependent upon our future performance, which is subject to general economic conditions, industry cycles and financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, many of which are beyond our control. High levels of indebtedness could have negative consequences to us, including:

we may have difficulty satisfying our obligations with respectapply to our outstanding debt;

we may have difficulty obtaining financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes;

we may need to use a substantial portion of our available cash flow from operations to pay interestconsolidated financial statements and principal on our debt, which would reduce the amount of money available to fund working capital requirements, capital expenditures, the payment of dividends and other general corporate or business activities;

our vulnerability to the effects of general economic downturns, adverse industry conditions and adverse operating results could increase;

our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to,that such changes in our business and in our industry in general could be limited;

we may not have the ability to pursue business opportunities that become available to us;

our amount of debt and the amount we must pay to service our debt obligations could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt;

our customers may react adversely to our significant debt level and seek alternative service providers; and

our failure to comply with the restrictive covenants in our debt instruments that, among other things, require us to maintain a specified ratio of our consolidated indebtedness to total capitalization and limit the ability of our subsidiaries to incur debt, could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

In addition, our $1.5 billion revolving credit facility matures on October 22, 2020, except for $40 millionresults of commitments that mature on March 17, 2019operations and $60 millionfinancial condition.  For a description of commitments that mature on October 22, 2019. Our ability to renew or replace our revolving credit facility is dependent on numerous factors, including our financial condition and prospects at the time and the then current state of the bank and capital markets in the U.S. Our liquidity may be adversely affected if we are unable to replace our revolving credit facility upon acceptable terms when it matures.

In July 2017, Moody’s Investor Services downgraded our corporate credit rating to Ba3 with a negative outlook from Ba2 with a stable outlook. In October 2017, S&P Global Ratings, or S&P, downgraded our corporate credit rating to B+ fromBB-; our outlook by S&P remains negative. These credit ratings are below investment grade and could raise our cost of financing. As a consequence, we may not be able to issue additional debt in amounts and/or with termsrecent accounting standards that we considerhave not yet adopted and, if known, our estimates of their expected impact, see Note 1 “General InformationRecent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted” to be reasonable. One or morethe Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 8 of these occurrences could limit our ability to pursue other business opportunities.this report.

Our revolving credit facility bears interest at variable rates, based on our corporate credit rating and market interest rates. If market interest rates increase, our cost to borrow under our revolving credit facility may also increase. Although we may employ hedging strategies such that a portion of the aggregate principal amount outstanding under our credit facility would effectively carry a fixed rate of interest, any hedging arrangement put in place may not offer complete protection from this risk.

Any significant cyber attack or other interruption in network security or the operation of critical computer systems could materially disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business.

Our business has become increasingly dependent upon information technologies, systems and networks to conductday-to-day operations, and we are placing greater reliance on technology to help support our operations and increase efficiency in our business functions. We are dependent upon our information technology and infrastructure, including operational and financial computer systems, to process the data necessary to conduct almost all aspects of our business. Computer and other business facilities and systems could become unavailable or impaired from a variety of causes including, among others, storms and other natural disasters, terrorist attacks, utility outages, theft, design defects, human error or complications encountered as existing systems are maintained, repaired, replaced or upgraded. It has also been reported that known or unknown entities or groups have mountedso-called “cyber attacks” on businesses and other organizations solely to disable or disrupt computer systems, disrupt operations and, in some cases, steal data. A breach or failure of our computer systems or networks, or those of our customers, vendors or others with whom we do business, could materially disrupt our business operations and our customers’ operations and could result in the alteration, loss, theft or corruption of data or unauthorized release of confidential, proprietary or sensitive data concerning our company, business activities, employees, customers or vendors. Any such breach or failure could have a material adverse effect on our operations, business or reputation.

Failure to obtain and retain highly skilled personnel could hurt our operations.

We require highly skilled personnel to operate and provide technical services and support for our business. A well-trained, motivated and adequately-staffed work force has a positive impact on our ability to attract and retain business. As a result, our future success depends on our continuing ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain skilled personnel for all areas of our organization. To the extent that demand for drilling services and/or the size of the active worldwide industry fleet increases, shortages of qualified personnel could arise, creating upward pressure on wages and

difficulty in staffing and servicing our rigs. Our continued ability to compete effectively depends on our ability to attract new employees and to retain and motivate our existing employees. Heightened competition for skilled personnel could materially and adversely limit our operations and further increase our costs.

We are controlled by a single stockholder, which could result in potential conflicts of interest.

Loews Corporation, which we refer to as Loews, beneficially owned approximately 53% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of February 9, 2018,7, 2020, and is in a position to control actions that require the consent of stockholders, including the election of directors, amendment of our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and any merger or sale of substantially all of our assets. In addition, three officers of Loews serve on our Board of Directors.Directors, or Board. We have also entered into a services agreement and a registration rights agreement with Loews, and we may in the future enter into other agreements with Loews.

In addition, under each of our credit facilities, a change of control event would occur if (a) any person other than Loews, its subsidiaries or affiliates and/or certain issuers of investment grade debt owns or has the power to vote more than 50% of our outstanding common stock or (b) any combination of Loews, its subsidiaries or affiliates and/or certain issuers of investment grade debt ceases to own or have the power to vote more than 25% of our outstanding common stock. If a change of control event occurs, we would be required to cash collateralize part or all of the lenders’ credit exposures under the credit facility if we fail to obtain at least one investment grade credit rating


as set forth in the credit facility.  Under our credit ratings as of the date of this report, we would be required to cash collateralize all of the lenders’ credit exposures under each credit facility if a change in control event occurred. See “Our significant debt levels may limit our liquidity and flexibility in obtaining additional financing and in pursuing other business opportunities.

Loews is a holding company, with principal subsidiaries (in addition to us) consisting of CNA Financial Corporation, a 90%an 89%-owned subsidiary engaged in commercial property and casualty insurance; Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, a 51%-ownedwholly-owned subsidiary engaged in the transportation and storage of natural gas and natural gas liquids; Loews Hotels & Co,Holding Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary engaged in the operation of a chain of hotels; and Consolidated Container Company,Altium Packaging LLC, a 99%-owned subsidiary providingengaged in the manufacture of rigid plastic packaging solutions to end markets such as beverage, food and household chemicals.solutions. It is possible that potential conflicts of interest could arise in the future for our directors who are also officers of Loews with respect to a number of areas relating to the past and ongoing relationships of Loews and us, including tax and insurance matters, financial commitments and sales of common stock pursuant to registration rights or otherwise. Although the affected directors may abstain from voting on matters in which our interests and those of Loews are in conflict so as to avoid potential violations of their fiduciary duties to stockholders, the presence of potential or actual conflicts could affect the process or outcome of Board deliberations.

Item 1B.   1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 2.   Properties.2. Properties.

We own an office building in Houston, Texas, where our corporate headquarters are located. We also own offices and other facilities in New Iberia, Louisiana, Aberdeen, Scotland, Macae, Brazil and Ciudad del Carmen, Mexico. Additionally, we currently lease various office, warehouse and storage facilities in Australia, Brazil, Louisiana, Malaysia, Singapore and the U.K. to support our offshore drilling operations.

See information with respect to legal proceedings in Note 1110 “Commitments and Contingencies” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

Item 4.   4. Mine Safety Disclosures.Disclosures.

Not applicable.


PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Price RangeMarket Information and Holders of Common StockRecord

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the symbol “DO.”  The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low closing prices of our common stock as reported by the NYSE.

   Common Stock 
   High   Low 

2017

    

First Quarter

  $19.49   $14.70 

Second Quarter

   16.31    10.26 

Third Quarter

   14.85    10.22 

Fourth Quarter

   18.94    14.31 

2016

    

First Quarter

  $24.09   $15.55 

Second Quarter

   26.04    20.28 

Third Quarter

   26.11    14.80 

Fourth Quarter

   21.08    15.42 

As of February 9, 2018,7, 2020, there were approximately 149118 holders of record of our common stock. This number represents registered stockholders and does not include stockholders who hold their shares through an institution.

Dividend Policy

We pay dividends at the discretion of our Board of Directors.Board. Any determination to declare a dividend, as well as the amount of any dividend that may be declared, will be based on the Board’s consideration of our financial position, earnings, earnings outlook, capital spending plans, outlook on current and future market conditions and business needs, contractual obligations and other factors that our Board considers relevant at that time. The Board’s dividend policy may change from time to time, but there can be no assurance that we will declare any cash dividends at all or in any particular amounts. See “Risk Factors —Although weWe have not paid cash dividends in the past, we did not pay any dividends in 2017 and we may not pay dividends in the future, and we can give no assurance asa dividend to the amount or timing of the payment of any future dividends” in Item 1A of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference. We discontinued our regular cash dividend in 2016.

stockholders since 2015.

CUMULATIVE TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURNCumulative Total Stockholder Return

The following graph shows the cumulative total stockholder return for our common stock, the Standard & Poor’s 400 MidCapPoor's SmallCap 600 Index and the Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services index over the five yearfive-year period ended December 31, 2017.2019.

Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return(1)

 

 

 Dec. 31,
2012
  Dec. 31,
2013
  Dec. 31,
2014
  Dec. 31,
2015
  Dec. 31,
2016
  Dec. 31,
2017
 

 

Dec. 31,

2014

 

 

Dec. 31,

2015

 

 

Dec. 31,

2016

 

 

Dec. 31,

2017

 

 

Dec. 31,

2018

 

 

Dec. 31,

2019

 

Diamond Offshore

  100   88   62   36   30   32 

 

$

100

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

49

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

20

 

S&P 400 MidCap Index

  100   133   146   143   173   201 

S&P SmallCap 600 Index

 

$

100

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

124

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

128

 

 

 

157

 

Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services

  100   128   106   82   105   87 

 

$

100

 

 

 

78

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

51

 

(1)

Total return assuming reinvestment of dividends. Assumes $100 invested on December 31, 20122014 in our common stock and the two published indices.

Our dividend history for the periods reported above is as follows:

   Q1   Q2   Q3   Q4 

Year

  Regular   Special   Regular   Special   Regular   Special   Regular   Special 

2017

  $   $   $   $   $   $   $   $ 

2016

  $   $   $   $   $   $   $   $ 

2015

  $0.125   $   $0.125   $   $0.125   $   $0.125   $ 

2014

  $0.125   $0.75   $0.125   $0.75   $0.125   $0.75   $0.125   $0.75 

2013

  $0.125   $0.75   $0.125   $0.75   $0.125   $0.75   $0.125   $0.75 


Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following table sets forth certain historical consolidated financial data relating to Diamond Offshore. We prepared the selected consolidated financial data from our consolidated financial statements as of and for the periods presented. The selected consolidated financial data below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”Operations" in Item 7 and our Consolidated Financial Statements (including the Notes thereto) in Item 8 of this report.

 

 As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 

 

As of and for the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 

 

2019

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

2017

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 (In thousands, except per share and ratio data) 

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

 

Income Statement Data:

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 $1,485,746  $1,600,342  $2,419,393  $2,814,671  $2,920,421 

 

$

980,644

 

 

 

$

1,083,215

 

(1)

 

$

1,485,746

 

 

 

$

1,600,342

 

 

 

$

2,419,393

 

 

Operating income (loss)

  123,879 (1)   (356,884) (1)   (294,074) (1)   572,562 (1)   801,606 

Net income (loss)

  18,346   (372,503  (274,285  387,011   548,686 

Net income (loss) per share:

     

Operating (loss) income

 

 

(282,330

)

 

 

 

(112,183

)

(2)

 

 

123,879

 

(2)

 

 

(356,884

)

(2)

 

 

(294,074

)

(2)

Net (loss) income

 

 

(357,214

)

 

 

 

(180,272

)

 

 

 

18,346

 

 

 

 

(372,503

)

 

 

 

(274,285

)

 

Net (loss) income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

  0.13   (2.72  (2.00  2.82   3.95 

 

 

(2.60

)

 

 

 

(1.31

)

 

 

 

0.13

 

 

 

 

(2.72

)

 

 

 

(2.00

)

 

Diluted

  0.13   (2.72  (2.00  2.81   3.95 

 

 

(2.60

)

 

 

 

(1.31

)

 

 

 

0.13

 

 

 

 

(2.72

)

 

 

 

(2.00

)

 

Balance Sheet Data:

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Drilling and other property and equipment, net

 $5,261,641 (1)  $5,726,935 (1)  $6,378,814 (1)  $6,945,953 (1)  $5,467,227 

 

$

5,152,828

 

 

 

$

5,184,222

 

(2)

 

$

5,261,641

 

(2)

 

$

5,726,935

 

(2)

 

$

6,378,814

 

(2)

Total assets

  6,250,570   6,371,877   7,149,894 (2)   8,005,398 (2)   8,374,437 (2) 

 

 

5,834,044

 

 

 

 

6,035,694

 

 

 

 

6,250,570

 

 

 

 

6,371,877

 

 

 

 

7,149,894

 

(3)

Long-term debt (excluding current maturities) (3)

  1,972,225   1,980,884   1,979,778 (2)   1,978,635 (2)   2,227,192 (2) 

Long-term debt (excluding current

maturities)(4)

 

 

1,975,741

 

 

 

 

1,973,922

 

 

 

 

1,972,225

 

 

 

 

1,980,884

 

 

 

 

1,979,778

 

(3)

Other Financial Data:

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures, excluding accruals

 $139,581  $652,673  $830,655  $2,032,764 (4)  $957,598 

 

$

326,090

 

 

 

$

222,406

 

 

 

$

139,581

 

 

 

$

652,673

 

 

 

$

830,655

 

 

Cash dividends declared per share

        0.50   3.50   3.50 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.50

 

 

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(5)

  0.91x   (3.21)x (6)   (2.45)x (6)   4.64  7.79

 

(1)

On January 1, 2018, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), or ASU 2014-09, which superseded previous revenue recognition requirements in ASU Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. Under the new guidance, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services and in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. We adopted ASU 2014-09, and its related amendments, or collectively Topic 606, using the modified retrospective implementation method, and, accordingly, have applied the five-step method outlined in Topic 606 for determining when and how revenue is recognized to all contracts that were not completed as of the date of adoption. Revenues for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts have not been adjusted and continue to be reported under the previous revenue recognition guidance. See Note 1 - “General Information - Changes in Accounting Principles - Revenue Recognition” and Note 2 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report for a discussion of the impact of adopting Topic 606.

(2)

During 2018, 2017, 2016 2015 and 20142015 we recorded impairment losses aggregating $27.2 million, $99.3 million, $678.1 million $860.4 million and $109.5$860.4 million, respectively, to write down certain of our drilling rigs and related equipment with indicators of impairment to their estimated recoverable amounts. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 — Overview — 2017 Compared to 2016 — Impairment of Assets” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 — Overview — 2016 Compared to 2015 — Impairment of Assets”in Item 7 and Note 23 “Asset Impairments” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report for a discussion of these impairments.

(2)

(3)

Historical data for the three annual periods ending on or beforeyear ended December 31, 2015 has been restated to reflect the effect thereon of the adoption on January 1, 2016 of an accounting standard whichthat requires debt issuance costs associated with our senior notes to be presented in the balance sheet as a reduction in the related long-term debt. Prior to the adoption of this accounting standard, debt issuance costs associated with our senior notes were presented as “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and “Other assets” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.  See Note 1 “General Information — Debt Issuance Costs” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

(3)

(4)

See Note 9 “Credit AgreementAgreements and Senior Notes” to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report for a discussion of changes to our long-term debt.

(4)During 2014, we took delivery of three ultra-deepwater drillships and two deepwater semisubmersible rigs. The aggregate net book value of these newly constructed rigs was $2.7 billion at December 31, 2014, of which $1.3 billion was reported in constructionwork-in-progress at December 31, 2013.
(5)For all periods presented, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed on a total enterprise basis. Earnings representpre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations plus fixed charges. Fixed charges include (i) interest, whether expensed or capitalized, (ii) amortization of debt issuance costs, whether expensed or capitalized, and (iii) a portion of rent expense, which we believe represents the interest factor attributable to rent.
(6)The deficiency in our earnings available for fixed charges for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $479.8 million and $388.9 million, respectively.


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and our Consolidated Financial Statements (including the Notes thereto) in Item 8 of this report.

This section of this Form 10-K generally discusses 2019 and 2018 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2019 and 2018. For a discussion of our financial condition and results of operations for 2018 compared to 2017, please refer to Item 7 of Part II, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019.

We provide contract drilling services to the energy industry around the globe with a fleet of 1715 offshore drilling rigs, consisting of four drillships and seven ultra-deepwater, four deepwater and11 semisubmersible rigs, including twomid-water semisubmersible rigs. The semisubmersibleOcean Victorywas sold in January 2018 andrigs that are cold stacked as of thejack-upOcean Scepter is currently being marketed for sale. We have excluded both rigs from our current fleet total. date of this report.

Market Overview

OilOver the past several years, crude oil prices have partially rebounded from the historical12-year lowbeen volatile, reaching a high of less than $30$115 per barrel in January 20162014 but dropping to $55 per barrel by the upper$60s-per-barrel rangeend of 2014. In 2015, oil prices continued to decline, closing at $37 per barrel at the end of January 2018.the year, and continuing to fall to a low of $28 per barrel during 2016 before recovering to nearly $57 per barrel by the end of 2016. The increaseprice of crude oil continued to fluctuate in 2017 and 2018, with oil prices in the $60- per-barrel range at the beginning of 2019.  As of the date of this report, Brent crude oil prices were in the mid-$50-per-barrel range, having started 2020 in the mid-to-upper $60-per-barrel range. As a result of, among other things, this continued volatility in commodity price is in part due toand its uncertain future, the late December 2017 shutdown ofoffshore drilling industry has experienced a major North Sea pipeline which led to production shutdowns at several offshore fields, and, production cuts by certain members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, and others that went into effect in 2017 to reduce the oversupply of oil and raise and potentially stabilize oil prices. However, the increase in oil prices has not yet resulted in a measurable increasesubstantial decline in demand for offshoreits services, as well as a significant decline in dayrates for contract drilling services or higher dayrates as capital spending for offshore exploration and development remains at a relatively low levelservices.

Industry-wide floater utilization was approximately 66% at the startend of 2019 based on industry analyst reports, which was unchanged from the third quarter of 2019, but an increase from nearly 60% utilization at the end of 2018. As a consequence, the offshore contractTendering activity has also increased in some markets, but drilling industry remains weak.

programs remain primarily short term in nature, with options for future wells. Industry analysts have reported that capital investments are expected to increase slightly in 2017, for2020 compared to recent years, but forecasted spending in 2020 remains lower than previous spending levels. Dayrates remain low and pricing power currently remains with the third consecutive year,customer, as some industry analysts have indicated that, based on historical data, utilization rates must increase to the global80%-range before pricing power shifts to the drilling contractor.

From a supply perspective, the offshore floater market remains oversupplied with approximately 240 rigs available based on industry reports. Over the last six years, 135 floaters reportedly have been scrapped; however, the pace of floater rigs decreased with 30 floaters being scrapped during the year, for a total of over 80 floaters retired since 2015. Despite these events, the oversupply of drilling rigs in the floater markets continues to persist as drilling rigs across all water depth categories continue to be cold stacked as they come off contract with no immediate future work. rig attrition has now slowed. Industry reports indicate that there remain approximately 4025 newbuild floaters on order with scheduled deliveries between 2018 and 2021. Industry analysts predict thatin 2020 through 2022. Of these newbuild rigs, 16 are scheduled for delivery in 2020, but only one is under contract as of the 2018 delivery dates may be deferred.

Givendate of this report. In addition, over the next twelve months, more than 60 currently contracted floaters are estimated to roll off their contracts, further adding to the oversupply of rigs, competition for the limited numberfloaters. This combination of factors points to a continued, challenging offshore drilling jobs remains intense. In some cases, dayrates have been negotiated at break-even or below-cost levels in order to enablemarket and a continuation of the drilling contractor to recover a portion of operating costs for rigs that would otherwise be uncontracted or cold stacked. In addition, customers have indicated a preference for “hot” rigs rather than reactivated cold-stacked rigs. This preference incentivizes the drilling contractor to contract rigs at lower rates for the sole purpose of maintaining the rigs in an active state and allowing for at least partial cost recovery.protracted industry downturn.

Our results of operations and cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2017 have been materially impacted by continuing depressed market conditions in the offshore drilling industry. We currently expect that these adverse market conditions will continue for the near term, which could result in more of our rigs being without contracts, contracted at lower rates than the rigs are currently earning and/or cold stacked or scrapped. These events, if they were to occur, could further materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. When we cold stack or elect to scrap a rig, we evaluate the rig for impairment. During 2017, 2016 and 2015, we recognized aggregate impairment losses of $99.3 million (three rigs), $678.1 million (eight rigs and related spares) and $860.4 million (17 rigs). See “— Results of Operations — Overview — 2017 Compared to 2016 — Impairment of Assets,” “— Results of Operations — Overview — 2016 Compared to 2015 — Impairment of Assets,” “Risk Factors — We may incur additional asset impairments and/or rig retirements asAs a result of reduced demand for certain offshore drilling rigs” in Item 1A of this reportthe continuing protracted industry downturn and Note 2 “Asset Impairments”these challenges, we are continuing to actively seek ways to drive efficiency, reduce non-productive time and provide technical innovation to our Consolidated Financial Statementscustomers. We expect these innovations and efficiencies to result in Item 8faster and safer drilling and completion of this report.

Historically,wells, leading to lower overall well costs to the longer a drilling rig remains cold stacked, the higher the costbenefit of reactivation and, depending on the age, technological obsolescence and condition of the rig, the lower the likelihood that the rig will be reactivated at a future date. As of January 29, 2018, five rigs in our fleet were cold stacked.customers.

See “—“– Contract Drilling Backlog”for future commitments of our rigs during 20182020 through 2020.

2023.

ContractDrillingBacklog

The following table reflects our contract drilling backlog as of January 1, 2018 (based on contract information known at that time), October 1, 2017 (the date reported in our Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017), and January 1, 2017 (the date reported in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016). Contract drilling backlog, as presented below, includes only firm commitments (typically represented by signed contracts) and is calculated by multiplying the contracted operating dayrate by the firm contract period. Our


calculation also assumes full utilization of our drilling equipment for the contract period (excluding scheduled shipyard and survey days); however, the amount of actual revenue to be earned and the actual periods during which revenues arewill be earned will be different than the amounts and periods shown in the tables below due to various factors. Utilization rates, which generally approach92-98% during contracted periods, can be adversely impacted by downtime due to various operating factors including but not limited to, weather conditions and unscheduled repairs and maintenance. Contract drilling backlog excludes revenues for mobilization, demobilization, contract preparation and customer reimbursables. No revenue is generally earned during periods of downtime for regulatory surveys. Changes in our contract drilling backlog between periods are generally a function of the performance of work on term contracts, as well as the extension or modification of existing term contracts and the execution of additional contracts. In addition, under certain circumstances, our customers may seek to terminate or renegotiate our contracts, which could adversely affect our reported backlog.

See “Risk Factors —We can provide no assurance that our drilling contracts will not be terminated early or that our current backlog of contract drilling revenue will be ultimately realized” in Item 1A of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The backlog information presented below does not, nor is it intended to, align with the disclosures related to revenue expected to be recognized in the future related to unsatisfied performance obligations, which are presented in Note 2 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report. Contract drilling backlog includes only future dayrate revenue as described above, while the disclosure in Note 2 excludes dayrate revenue and only reflects expected future revenue for mobilization, demobilization and capital modifications to our rigs, which are related to non-distinct promises within our signed contracts.

The following table reflects our contract drilling backlog as of January 1, 2020 (based on information available at that time), October 1, 2019 (the date reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019), and January 1, 2019 (the date reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018) (in millions).

 

   January 1,
2018
   October 1,
2017
   January 1,
2017
 
   (In thousands) 

Contract Drilling Backlog

      

Ultra-Deepwater Floaters

  $2,222,000   $2,413,000   $3,215,000 

Deepwater Floaters

   90,000    86,000    197,000 

Other Rigs(1)

   105,000    118,000    152,000 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $2,417,000   $2,617,000   $3,564,000 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

January 1,

2020(1)

 

 

October 1,

2019(1)

 

 

January 1,

2019(1)

 

Contract Drilling Backlog

 

$

1,611

 

 

$

1,835

 

 

$

1,973

 

 

(1)

Includes contract

Contract drilling backlog for ourmid-water floatersas of January 1, 2020, October 1, 2019 and January 1, 2019 excludes future commitment amounts totaling approximately $100.0 million, $130.0 million and for periods prior$135.0 million, respectively, payable by a customer in the form of a guarantee of gross margin to 2018, ourjack-up rig.be earned on future contracts or by direct payment, pursuant to terms of an existing contract.

The following table reflects the amount of our contract drilling backlog by year as of January 1, 2018.2020 (in millions).

 

   For the Years Ending December 31, 
   Total   2018   2019   2020 
   (In thousands) 

Contract Drilling Backlog

        

Ultra-Deepwater Floaters

  $2,222,000   $1,062,000   $927,000   $233,000 

Deepwater Floaters

   90,000    45,000    45,000     

Other Rigs(1)

   105,000    42,000    45,000    18,000 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $2,417,000   $1,149,000   $1,017,000   $251,000 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ending December 31,

 

 

 

Total

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

Contract Drilling Backlog (1)

 

$

1,611

 

 

$

802

 

 

$

486

 

 

$

209

 

 

$

114

 

 

(1)

Includes contract

Contract drilling backlog as of January 1, 2020 excludes future gross margin commitments totaling approximately $100.0 million, which is comprised of approximately $25.0 million for ourmid-water floaters.2020 and an aggregate of approximately $75.0 million for the three-year period ending December 31, 2023.  These amounts are payable by a customer in the form of a guarantee of gross margin to be earned on future contracts or by direct payment at the end of each of the two respective periods, pursuant to terms of an existing contract.


The following table reflects the percentage of rig days committed by year as of January 1, 2018.2020. The percentage of rig days committed is calculated as the ratio of total days committed under contracts, as well as scheduled shipyard, survey and mobilization days for all rigs in our fleet, to total available days (number of rigs, including cold-stacked rigs, multiplied by the number of days in a particular year).

 

   For the Years Ending
December 31,
 
     2018      2019       2020   

Rig Days Committed(1)

     

Ultra-Deepwater Floaters

   71  59   17

Deepwater Floaters

   29  24    

Other Rigs(2)

   37  33   12

 

 

For the Years Ending December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

Rig Days Committed (1)

 

75%

 

 

42%

 

 

15%

 

 

8%

 

 

(1)

As of January 1, 2018,2020, includes approximately 95480 rig days, 30 rig days and 30 rig days currently known and scheduled shipyard days for contract preparation, mobilization of rigs, surveys and extended repair and maintenance projects as well as mobilization days, for the year 2018.years 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively.

(2)Includes rig days committed for ourmid-water floaters.

Important Factors That May Impact Our Operating Results, Financial Condition or Cash Flows

Operating Income.Our operating income is primarily a function of contract drilling revenue earned less contract drilling expenses incurred or recognized. The two most significant variables affecting our contract drilling revenue are the dayrates earned and utilization rates achieved by our rigs, each of which is a function of rig supply and demand in the marketplace. These factors are not entirely within our control and are difficult to predict. We generally recognize revenue from dayrate drilling contracts as services are performed. Consequently, when a rig is idle, no dayrate is earned and revenue will decrease as a result.

Revenue is also affected by the acquisition or disposal of rigs, rig mobilizations, required surveys and shipyard projects. In connection with certain drilling contracts, we may receive fees for the mobilization and demobilization of equipment. In addition, some of our drilling contracts require downtime before the start of the contract to prepare the rig to meet customer requirements for which we may or may not be compensated. We earnrecognize these fees ratably as services are performed over the initial term of the related drilling contracts. We defer mobilization and contract preparation fees received (on either alump-sum or dayrate basis), as well as direct and incremental costs associated with the mobilization of equipment and contract preparation activities, and amortize each, on a straight-line basis, over the term of the related drilling contracts. Absent aAs noted above, demobilization revenue expected to be received upon contract mobilization costs arecompletion is estimated and is also recognized currently.ratably over the initial term of the contract.

Operating income also fluctuates due to varying levels of contract drilling expenses. Our operating expenses represent all direct and indirect costs associated with the operation and maintenance of our drilling equipment, which generally are not affected by changes in dayrates and short-term reductions in utilization. For instance, if a rig is to be idle for a short period of time, few decreases in operating expenses may actually occur since the rig is typically maintained in a prepared or “warm-stacked” state with a full crew. In addition, when a rig is idle, we are responsible for certain operating expenses such as rig fuel and supply boat costs, which are typically costs of the operatorour customer when a rig is under contract. However, if a rig is expected to be idle for an extended period of time, we may reduce the size of a rig’s crew and take steps to “cold stack” the rig, which lowers expenses and partially offsets the impact on operating income. The cost of cold stacking a rig can vary depending on the type of rig. The cost of cold stacking a drillship, for example, is typically substantially higher than the cost of cold stacking ajack-up rig or an older floater rig.

The principal components of our operating costs are, among other things,expenses include direct and indirect costs of labor and benefits, repairs and maintenance, freight, regulatory inspections, boat and helicopter rentals and insurance. Labor and repair and maintenance costs represent the most significant components of our operating expenses. In general, our labor costs increase primarily due to higher salary levels, rig staffing requirements and costs associated with labor regulations in the geographic regions in which our rigs operate. In addition, the costs associated with training employees can be significant. Costs to repair and maintain our equipment fluctuate depending upon the type of activity the drilling unit is

performing, as well as the age and condition of the equipment and the regions in which our rigs are working. See “—“– Contractual Cash Obligations — Pressure Control by the Hour®Hour®.”

Regulatory Surveys and Planned Downtime.Our operating income is negatively impacted when we perform certain regulatory inspections, which we refer to as a special survey, that are due every five years for most of our rigs. The inspection interval for our North Sea rigs istwo-and-one-half years. Operating revenue decreases because


these special surveys are generally performed during scheduled downtime in a shipyard. Operating expenses increase as a result of these special surveys due to the cost to mobilize the rigs to a shipyard, inspection costs incurred and repair and maintenance costs, which are recognized as incurred. Repair and maintenance activities may result from the special survey or may have been previously planned to take place during this mandatory downtime. The number of rigs undergoing a special survey will vary from year to year, as well as from quarter to quarter.

During 2018,2020, we expect to spend approximately 20480 days for upgrades, surveys, contract preparation and 75mobilization of rigs, which includes approximately 80 days for contract preparation for the Ocean Onyx, an aggregate of approximately 285 days for special surveys and upgrades for theOcean PatriotBlackRhino andOcean Valiant,respectively. Additionally, we expect to spendBlackLion, approximately 3560 days for a special surveythe mobilization of and contract preparation for theOcean ValorMonarch prior to its contract in 2018, during the paid contracted standby period.Myanmar and approximately 55 days for mobilization and contract preparation activities for other rigs. We can provide no assurance as to the exact timing and/or duration of downtime associated with regulatory inspections, planned rig mobilizations and other shipyardthese projects. See “— “ – Contract Drilling Backlog.Backlog.

Physical Damage and Marine Liability Insurance.We are self-insured for physical damage to rigs and equipment caused by named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, as defined by the relevant insurance policy.Mexico. If a named windstorm in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico causes significant damage to our rigs or equipment, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Under our current insurance policy, which renewed effective May 1, 2017, we carry physical damage insurance for certain losses other than those caused by named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico for which our deductible for physical damage is $25.0 million per occurrence. We do not typically retainloss-of-hire insurance policies to cover our rigs.

In addition, under our current insurance policy, which renewed effective May 1, 2017, we carry marine liability insurance covering certain legal liabilities, including coverage for certain personal injury claims, and generally covering liabilities arising out of or relating to pollution and/or environmental risk. We believe that the policy limit for our marine liability insurance is within the range that is customary for companies of our size in the offshore drilling industry and is appropriate for our business. OurUnder these policies our deductibles for marine liability coverage related to insurable events arising due to named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico isare $25.0 million for the first occurrence with no aggregate deductible, and vary in amounts ranging between $25.0 million and, if aggregate claims exceed certain thresholds, up to $100.0 million for each subsequent occurrence, depending on the nature, severity and frequency of claims that might arise during the policy year. Our deductibles for other marine liability coverage, including personal injury claims not related to named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, are $10.0$5.0 million for the first occurrence and vary in amounts ranging between $5.0 million and, if aggregate claims exceed certain thresholds, up to $100.0 million for each subsequent occurrence, depending on the nature, severity and frequency of claims that might arise during the policy year.

2017 Reduction Plan. The contract drilling industry has experienced a severe downturn that began inmid-2014 with a dramatic decline in oil prices, resulting in a lack of demand for the services we provide, primarily in the area of deepwater drilling. This lack of demand, combined with a significant oversupply of drilling rigs, has caused our management to again review our organizational and operational structure, in an effort to further reduce our operating profile. In late 2017, we undertook a reorganization of our operational structure, including the identification of redundant positions and, among other things, negotiated the termination of our agency relationship in Brazil. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we recognized $14.1 million in “Restructuring and separation costs” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations primarily associated with the severance of certain executives and other employees and termination of our agency agreement in Brazil, the majority of which was unpaid at December 31, 2017. As we continue to position our organization to compete effectively in what we continue to expect to be a protracted downturn, we expect to continue our assessment of our organizational structure during 2018. For the first quarter of 2018, we expect to incur approximately $3 million in severance costs for additional redundant employees. If market conditions do not significantly improve in the near term and the market downturn remains protracted, additional actions may be required to further reduce our cost profile.

Impact of Changes in Tax Laws or Their Interpretation.We operate through our various subsidiaries in a number of countriesjurisdictions throughout the world. As a result, we are subject to highly complex tax laws, treaties and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate, which may change and are subject to interpretation. Changes in laws, treaties and regulations and the interpretation of such laws, treaties and regulations may put us at risk for future tax assessments and liabilities which could be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, commonly referred to as the Tax Reform Act. The Tax Reform Act amended the Internal Revenue Code in several areas that had a direct and immediate effect on our results of operations and statement of financial position as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, including, among other items, aone-time mandatory deemed repatriation of accumulated earnings of our foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and a reduction in the U.S corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in January 2018. We have used our best judgment to estimate the impact of the Tax Reform Act on our reported results. Due to the timing of the enactment of the Tax Reform Act, there continues to be a significant amount of uncertainty as to the appropriate application of a number of the underlying provisions, pending further guidance and clarification from the relevant authorities. We will continue to monitor developments in this area and adjust our estimates throughout the year in 2018, as and if necessary, as additional guidance and clarification becomes available. See “—Critical Accounting Estimates Income Taxes,” “Results of Operations — Overview — 2017 Compared to 2016 —Income Tax Benefit” and Note 15 “Income Taxes” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our significant accounting policies are included in Note 1 “General Information” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report. Judgments, assumptions and estimates by our management are inherent in the preparation of our financial statements and the application of our significant accounting policies. We believe that our most critical accounting estimates are as follows:

Property, Plant and Equipment.We carry our drilling and other property and equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and routine repairs are charged to income currently while replacements and betterments that upgrade or increase the functionality of our existing equipment and that significantly extend the useful life of an existing asset, are capitalized. Significant judgments, assumptions and estimates may be required in determining whether or not such replacements and betterments meet the criteria for capitalization and in determining useful lives and salvage values of such assets. Changes in these judgments, assumptions and estimates could


produce results that differ from those reported. Historically, the amount of capital additions requiring significant judgments, assumptions or estimates has not been significant. During the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, we capitalized $69.4$343.8 million and $177.6$243.6 million, respectively, in replacements and betterments of our drilling fleet.

We evaluate our property and equipment for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable (such as, but not limited to, cold stacking a rig, the expectation of cold stacking a rig in the near term,future, contracted backlog of less than one year for a rig, a decision to retire or scrap a rig, or excess spending over budget on a newbuild, construction project or major rig upgrade). We utilize an undiscounted probability-weighted cash flow analysis in testing an asset for potential impairment. Our assumptions and estimates underlying this analysis include the following:

dayrate by rig;

utilization rate by rig if active, warm stacked or cold stacked (expressed as the actual percentage of time per year that the rig would be used at certain dayrates);

the per day operating cost for each rig if active, warm stacked or cold stacked;

the estimated annual cost for rig replacements and/or enhancement programs;

the estimated maintenance, inspection or other reactivation costs associated with a rig returning to work;

salvage value for each rig; and

the estimated maintenance, inspection or other reactivation costs associated with a rig returning to work;

salvage value for each rig; and

estimated proceeds that may be received on disposition of each rig.

Based on these assumptions, we develop a matrix for each rig under evaluation using multiple utilization/dayrate scenarios, to each of which we have assigned a probability of occurrence. We arrive at a projected probability-weighted cash flow for each rig based on the respective matrix and compare such amount to the carrying value of the asset to assess recoverability.

The underlying assumptions and assigned probabilities of occurrence for utilization and dayrate scenarios are developed using a methodology that examines historical data for each rig, which considers the rig’s age, rated water depth and other attributes and then assesses its future marketability in light of the current and projected market environment at the time of assessment. Other assumptions, such as operating, maintenance, inspection and reactivation costs, are estimated using historical data adjusted for known developments, cost projections forre-entry of rigs into the market and future events that are anticipated by management at the time of the assessment.

Management’s assumptions are necessarily subjective and are an inherent part of our asset impairment evaluation, and the use of different assumptions could produce results that differ from those reported. Our methodology generally involves the use of significant unobservable inputs, representative of a Level 3 fair value measurement, which may include assumptions related to future dayrate revenue, costs and rig utilization, quotes from rig brokers, the long-term future performance of our rigs and future market conditions. Management’s assumptions involve uncertainties about future demand for our services, dayrates, expenses and other future events, and management’s expectations may not be indicative of future outcomes. Significant unanticipated changes to these assumptions could materially alter our analysis in testing an asset for potential impairment. For example, changes in market conditions that exist at the measurement date or that are projected by management could affect our key assumptions. Other events or circumstances that could affect our assumptions may include, but are not limited to, a further sustained decline in oil and gas prices, cancelations of our drilling contracts or contracts of our competitors, contract modifications, costs to comply with new governmental regulations, capital expenditures required due to advances in offshore drilling technology, growth in the global oversupply of oil and geopolitical events, such as lifting sanctions onoil-producing nations. Should actual market conditions in the future vary significantly from market conditions used in our projections, our assessment of impairment would likely be different.

During 2017,We did not incur an impairment loss in response to continued depressed market conditions for the offshore contract drilling industry and our expectations that a market recovery is not likely to occur in the near term, we evaluated ten of our drilling rigs with indications that their carrying values may not be recoverable. As a result of these evaluations, we determined that the carrying values of one ultra-deepwater semisubmersible, one deepwater semisubmersible and onejack-up rig were impaired and recorded impairment losses of $71.3 million and $28.0 million during the second and fourth quarters of 2017, respectively.

During 2016, we evaluated 15 of our drilling rigs with indications that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable2019 and   recorded an aggregate impairment loss of $678.1$27.2 million related to eight rigs including an $8.1 million impairment of rig spares and supplies. During 2015, we evaluated 25 of our drilling rigs with indications that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable and recorded an aggregate impairment loss of $860.4 million related to 17 drilling rigs.in 2018. See “— Results of Operations — Overview — 2017 Compared to 2016 — Impairment of Assets” and “— Results of Operations —Overview — 2016 Compared to 2015 — Impairment of Assets” and Note 23 “Asset Impairments” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

Personal Injury Claims.Under our current insurance policies, which renewed effective May 1, 2017, our deductibles for marine liability insurance coverage with respect to personal injury claims not related to named windstorms in the U.S.

Gulf of Mexico, which primarily result from Jones Act liability in the Gulf of Mexico, are $10.0$5.0 million for the first occurrence with no aggregate deductible, and vary in


amounts ranging between $5.0 million and, if aggregate claims exceed certain thresholds, up to $100.0 million for each subsequent occurrence, depending on the nature, severity and frequency of claims that might arise during the policy year. Our deductibledeductibles for personal injury claims arising due to named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico isare $25.0 million for the first occurrence with no aggregate deductible, and vary in amounts ranging between $25.0 million and, if aggregate claims exceed certain thresholds, up to $100.0 million for each subsequent occurrence, depending on the nature, severity and frequency of claims that might arise during the policy year. The Jones Act is a federal law that permits seamen to seek compensation for certain injuries during the course of their employment on a vessel and governs the liability of vessel operators and marine employers for the work-related injury or death of an employee. We engage outside consultants to assist us in estimating our aggregate liability for personal injury claims based on our historical losses and utilizing various actuarial models.

The models used in estimating our aggregate reserve for personal injury claims include actuarial assumptions such as:

claim emergence, or the delay between occurrence and recording of claims;

settlement patterns, or the rates at which claims are closed;

development patterns, or the rate at which known cases develop to their ultimate level;

average, potential frequency and severity of claims; and

effect ofre-opened claims.

effect of re-opened claims.

The eventual settlement or adjudication of these claims could differ materially from our estimated amounts due to uncertainties such as:

the severity of personal injuries claimed;

significant changes in the volume of personal injury claims;

the unpredictability of legal jurisdictions where the claims will ultimately be litigated;

inconsistent court decisions; and

the risks and lack of predictability inherent in personal injury litigation.

significant changes in the volume of personal injury claims;

the unpredictability of legal jurisdictions where the claims will ultimately be litigated;

inconsistent court decisions; and

the risks and lack of predictability inherent in personal injury litigation.

Income Taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with accounting standards that require the recognition of the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and an asset and liability approach in recognizing the amount of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been currently recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. In each of our tax jurisdictions we recognize a current tax liability or asset for the estimated taxes payable or refundable on tax returns for the current year and a deferred tax asset or liability for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance, if necessary, which is determined by the amount of any tax benefits that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized under a “more likely than not” approach. We do not establish deferred tax liabilities for certain of our foreign earnings that we intend to indefinitely reinvest to finance foreign activities. However, if these earnings become subject to U.S. federal tax, any required provision could have a material adverse impact on our financial results. We make judgments regarding future events and related estimates especially as they pertain to the forecasting of our effective tax rate, the potential realization of deferred tax assets such as net operating loss carryforwards, utilization of foreign tax credits, and exposure to the disallowance of items deducted on tax returns upon audit.

Certain of our international rigs are owned and operated, directly or indirectly, by DFAC. As of December 31, 2017, all unremitted earnings of DFAC have been deemed repatriated as a result of the Tax Reform Act, and U.S. taxes have been provided for them. We intend to indefinitely reinvest earnings of DFAC and its foreign subsidiaries to finance our foreign activities.

The Tax Reform Act requires a U.S. shareholder of a foreign corporation to include in income its global intangiblelow-taxed income, or GILTI. Due to the fact that the GILTI computation is dependent on contingent or future events that cannot reasonably be known, we have made the accounting policy decision, as permitted by U.S. GAAP, to account for U.S. tax on GILTI, should it be applicable, as a period cost in the period in which the tax would be incurred, as opposed to recognizing deferred taxes on the basis differences that are expected to affect the amount of GILTI.

In several of the international locations in which we operate, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries enter into agreements with other of our wholly-owned subsidiaries to provide specialized services and equipment in support of our foreign operations. We apply a transfer pricing methodology to determine the arm’s length amount to be charged for providing the services and equipment, and utilize outside consultants to assist us in the development of such transfer pricing methodologies. In most cases, there are alternative transfer pricing methodologies that could be applied to these transactions and, if applied, could result in different chargeable amounts.


Results of Operations

Although we performOur operating results for contract drilling services with different types of drilling rigsare dependent on three primary metrics or key performance indicators: revenue-earning days, rig utilization and in many geographic locations, there is a similarity of economic characteristics due to the nature of the revenue-earning process as it relates to the offshore drilling industry, over the operating lives of our drilling rigs. We believe that the combination of our drilling rigs into one reportable segment is the appropriate aggregation in accordance with applicable accounting standards on segment reporting. However, for purposes of this discussion and analysis of our results of operations, we provide greater detail with respect to the types of rigs in our fleet to enhance the reader’s understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations.

Keyaverage daily revenue. The following table presents these three key performance indicators by equipment type are listed below.and other comparative data relating to our revenues and operating expenses (in thousands, except days, daily amounts and percentages).  

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2017  2016  2015 

REVENUE-EARNING DAYS(1)

  

Floaters:

    

Ultra-Deepwater

   2,546   2,074   2,690 

Deepwater

   874   844   1,339 

Mid-Water

   445   727   1,433 

Jack-ups

   282   149   909 

UTILIZATION(2)

    

Floaters:

    

Ultra-Deepwater

   59  51  64

Deepwater

   41  34  52

Mid-Water

   27  30  36

Jack-ups

   61  8  42

AVERAGE DAILY REVENUE(3)

    

Floaters:

    

Ultra-Deepwater

  $428,200  $477,000  $497,700 

Deepwater

   231,600   304,600   409,800 

Mid-Water

   309,500   342,000   270,500 

Jack-ups

   74,900   202,700   93,400 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

REVENUE-EARNING DAYS (1)

 

 

3,317

 

 

 

3,192

 

UTILIZATION (2)

 

 

56

%

 

 

51

%

AVERAGE DAILY REVENUE (3)

 

$

272,600

 

 

$

329,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVENUE RELATED TO CONTRACT

   DRILLING SERVICES

 

$

934,934

 

 

$

1,059,973

 

REVENUE RELATED TO REIMBURSABLE

   EXPENSES

 

 

45,710

 

 

 

23,242

 

TOTAL REVENUES

 

$

980,644

 

 

$

1,083,215

 

CONTRACT DRILLING EXPENSE,

   EXCLUDING DEPRECIATION

 

$

793,412

 

 

$

722,834

 

REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES

 

$

45,016

 

 

$

22,917

 

OPERATING LOSS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contract drilling services, net

 

$

141,522

 

 

$

337,139

 

Reimbursable expenses, net

 

 

694

 

 

 

325

 

Depreciation

 

 

(355,596

)

 

 

(331,789

)

General and administrative expense

 

 

(67,878

)

 

 

(85,351

)

Impairment of assets

 

 

 

 

 

(27,225

)

Restructuring and separation costs

 

 

 

 

 

(5,041

)

Loss on disposition of assets

 

 

(1,072

)

 

 

(241

)

Total Operating Loss

 

$

(282,330

)

 

$

(112,183

)

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

 

6,382

 

 

 

8,477

 

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized

 

 

(122,832

)

 

 

(123,240

)

Foreign currency transaction loss

 

 

(3,936

)

 

 

(379

)

Other, net

 

 

702

 

 

 

700

 

Loss before income tax benefit

 

 

(402,014

)

 

 

(226,625

)

Income tax benefit

 

 

44,800

 

 

 

46,353

 

NET LOSS

 

$

(357,214

)

 

$

(180,272

)

 

(1)

A revenue-earning day is defined as a24-hour period during which a rig earns a dayrate after commencement of operations and excludes mobilization, demobilization and contract preparation days.

(2)

Utilization is calculated as the ratio of total revenue-earning days divided by the total calendar days in the period for all specified rigs in our fleet (including three cold-stacked floater rigs but excluding rigs under construction). As ofat both December 31, 2017, our cold-stacked rigs included three ultra-deepwater semisubmersibles2019 and two deepwater semisubmersibles. As of December 31, 2016, our cold-stacked rigs included four ultra-deepwater semisubmersibles, three deepwater semisubmersibles, and threemid-water semisubmersibles. As of December 31, 2015, our cold-stacked rigs consisted of one ultra-deepwater, two deepwater and fourmid-water semisubmersible rigs and fivejack-up rigs, which were being marketed for sale at that time.2018).

(3)

Average daily revenue is defined as total contract drilling revenue for all of the specified rigs in our fleet per revenue-earning day.

Comparative data relating to our revenues and operating expenses by equipment type are listed below.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2017  2016  2015 
   (In thousands) 

CONTRACT DRILLING REVENUE

    

Floaters:

    

Ultra-Deepwater

  $1,090,139  $989,158  $1,339,059 

Deepwater

   202,329   256,997   548,667 

Mid-Water

   137,607   248,846   387,549 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Floaters

   1,430,075   1,495,001   2,275,275 

Jack-ups

   21,144   30,213   84,909 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Contract Drilling Revenue

  $1,451,219  $1,525,214  $2,360,184 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

REVENUES RELATED TO REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES

  $34,527  $75,128  $59,209 

CONTRACT DRILLING EXPENSE

    

Floaters:

    

Ultra-Deepwater

  $561,505  $494,510  $620,122 

Deepwater

   115,350   148,992   277,779 

Mid-Water

   69,050   84,194   230,606 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Floaters

   745,905   727,696   1,128,507 

Jack-ups

   25,428   17,854   65,699 

Other

   30,631   26,623   33,658 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Contract Drilling Expense

  $801,964  $772,173  $1,227,864 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES

  $33,744  $58,058  $58,050 

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)

    

Floaters:

    

Ultra-Deepwater

  $528,634  $494,648  $718,937 

Deepwater

   86,979   108,005   270,888 

Mid-Water

   68,557   164,652   156,943 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Floaters

   684,170   767,305   1,146,768 

Jack-ups

   (4,284  12,359   19,210 

Other

   (30,631  (26,623  (33,658

Reimbursable expenses, net

   783   17,070   1,159 

Depreciation

   (348,695  (381,760  (493,162

General and administrative expense

   (74,505  (63,560  (66,462

Bad debt recovery

      265    

Impairment of assets

   (99,313  (678,145  (860,441

Restructuring and separation costs

   (14,146     (9,778

Gain (loss) on disposition of assets

   10,500   (3,795  2,290 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Operating Income (Loss)

  $123,879  $(356,884 $(294,074
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

    

Interest income

   2,473   768   3,322 

Interest expense

   (113,528  (89,934  (93,934

Loss on extinguishment of senior notes

   (35,366      

Foreign currency transaction (loss) gain

   (1,128  (11,522  2,465 

Other, net

   2,230   (10,727  873 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income tax benefit

   (21,440  (468,299  (381,348

Income tax benefit

   39,786   95,796   107,063 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

  $18,346  $(372,503 $(274,285
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Overview

20172019 Compared to 20162018

Operating Income (Loss).OperatingNet results for 2017 increased $480.82019 decreased $176.9 million compared to 2016,2018, reflecting lower margins from our contract drilling services, primarily due to adriven by lower aggregate impairment loss recognized in 2017 ($578.8 million), combined with reduced depreciation expense ($33.1 million). Depreciation expense decreased compared to 2016, primarily due to a lower depreciable asset base, as a result of asset impairments in 2016 and 2017. These favorable variances were partially offset by a $99.8 million net reduction in rig operating results for our floater andjack-up rigs, $14.1 million in restructuring and severance costs recognized in 2017 and the absence of $14.6 million in net reimbursable revenue earned by theOcean Endeavorin 2016.contract drilling revenue.

Contract Drilling Revenue. Contract drilling revenue decreased $74.0$125.0 million during 20172019 compared to 2016,2018, primarily as a result of adue to lower average daily revenue earned by all rig types,($187.7 million) and the absence of loss-of-hire insurance proceeds ($8.4 million), which were recognized during 2018.  These negative factors were partially offset by the favorableeffect


in 2019 of 125 incremental revenue-earning days ($41.1 million) and recognition of revenues related to a gross margin commitment from a customer ($30.0 million). Comparing the two years, average daily revenue decreased primarily due to lower dayrates earned by some of our rigs as a result of renegotiating certain existing contracts during 2018 and a lower dayrate earned by the Ocean GreatWhite, which operated under new contracts in the U.K. in 2019. Revenue-earning days increased during 2019 primarily due to incremental revenue-earning days for the Ocean Endeavor (185 days), which was reactivated for a new contract in 2019, and fewer mobilization and non-productive days (250 days), partially offset by the unfavorable impact of an aggregate 353 incremental downtime for planned shipyard projects (78 days) and fewer revenue-earning days. Totaldays for the Ocean Guardian (232 days), which was sold in April 2019.  

Contract Drilling Expense, Excluding Depreciation. Contract drilling expense, excluding depreciation, increased $70.6 million during 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to incremental amortization of previously deferred contract preparation and mobilization costs ($28.3 million), incremental contract drilling expense for 2017the reactivated Ocean Endeavor ($28.6 million), and increased $29.8 million compared to 2016, reflecting higher amortizedcosts for our 2019 rig mobilization expensefleet for labor and personnel ($25.4 million) and incremental costs associated with the Pressure Control by the Hour® program, or the PCbtH program, on our drillships ($27.85.1 million), partially offset by lower repairrepairs and maintenance costs ($15.218.1 million) and a net reduction in other rig operating, equipment rental ($8.0 million), catering ($2.4 million), shorebase support and overhead costs ($8.210.1 million).

Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized.Interest expense increased $23.6 million during 2017 compared to 2016, primarily as a result of a $20.7 million reduction in interest capitalized during 2017 due to the completion of construction projects in 2016. Interest expense for 2017 also included incremental interest expense associated with newly-issued debt and subsequent debt redemption of existing debt in August 2017other rig costs ($4.03.0 million), which was.  These increases were partially offset by reduced interest expense associated with lower borrowings under our revolving credit agreementcosts in 2019 for the previously-owned Ocean Guardian ($2.824.4 million). See “— Liquidity and Capital Resources — Senior Notes.”

Impairment of Assets. During 2017, we determined that the carrying values of one ultra-deepwater semisubmersible, one deepwater semisubmersible, and onejack-up rig were impaired. As a result, we recorded impairment losses of $71.3 million and $28.0 million during the second and fourth quarters of 2017, respectively. The deepwater semisubmersible rig, which was sold in April 2019, and lower fuel costs ($8.6 million) for scrap in January 2018,our fleet.

Other Operating Expenses. Our results for 2019 also reflect higher depreciation expense ($23.8 million), compared to the prior year, primarily due to capital expenditures and thejack-up rig is being marketed for sale. During the second quarter completion of 2016, we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $678.1 million with respectsoftware implementation projects in 2019, partially offset by a reduction in general and administrative expense in 2019 due to the carrying valuesabsence of twomid-water, three deepwater, and three ultra-deepwater semisubmersible rigs, including related rig spares and supplies.a charge recorded in 2018 for settlement of a legal claim ($17.5 million). There were no impairments or restructuring charges incurred in 2019. See “— Critical Accounting Estimates — Property, Plant and Equipment” and Note 1 “General Information —Assets Held for Sale” and Note 23 “Asset Impairments” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

Restructuring and Separation Costs.During the fourth quarter of 2017, our management approved and initiated a plan to restructure our worldwide operations, which also included a reduction in workforce at our corporate facilities and onshore bases. During 2017, we recognized $14.1 million in restructuring and other employee separation related costs, including $11.5 million related to a negotiated termination of our agency agreement in Brazil. See “Important Factors that May Impact Our Operating Results, Financial Condition or Cash Flows — 2017 Reduction Plan.”

Gain on Disposition of Assets.During 2017, we sold one ultra-deepwater floater, one deepwater floater, threemid-water floaters and onejack-up rig for scrap and recognized an aggregatepre-tax gain of $8.9 million on the sale of these rigs. In 2016, we sold one deepwater rig, three midwater rigs and fourjack-ups for a netpre-tax loss of $4.0 million.

Loss on Extinguishment of Senior Notes.During the third quarter of 2017, we recorded a $35.4 million loss on extinguishment of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of our senior notes that were to mature in 2019. See “— Liquidity and Capital Resources — Senior Notes.”

Other, net.During 2016, we sold our investment in privately-placed corporate bonds for a total recognized loss of $12.1 million.

Income Tax Benefit.During 20172019 and 2016,2018, we recorded net income tax benefits of $39.8$44.8 million (11.4% effective tax rate) and $95.8$46.4 million (20.5% effective tax rate), respectively, on net losses of $21.4$402.0 million and $468.3$226.6 million, respectively.  The varianceIncome tax benefit for the 2018 period included a tax benefit related to the reversal of an uncertain tax position related to a toll charge related to the one-time mandatory repatriation of previously deferred earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries ($43.3 million), or Transition Tax.  Income tax benefit for the 2019 period included a tax benefit associated with the reduction of our Transition Tax liability pursuant to final regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service in June 2019 ($14.2 million), partially offset by deferred tax expense associated with Swiss tax reform ($12.1 million).  

Other than these discrete tax adjustments, the difference in the amount of income tax benefit

recognized between years isin 2019, compared to 2018, was in large part due to differences in the mix of our domestic and internationalpre-tax earnings and losses including asset impairments taken during both 2017 and 2016 in various jurisdictions, as well as discrete tax items recorded in each period as a result of, including but not limited to, tax audits or assessments and filed or amended tax returns.

In addition, as a result of the Tax Reform Act that was signed into law on December 22, 2017, we recorded incremental income tax expense of $1.1 million, consisting of (i) a $75.4 million charge related to the immediate deemed repatriation of the previously deferred accumulated earnings of ournon-U.S. subsidiaries and (ii) a $74.3 million benefit resulting from the remeasurement of our net U.S. deferred tax liability at the lower corporate income tax rate. During 2016, we recorded a $43.0 million reduction in income tax expense, primarily related to our Egyptian tax liability for uncertain tax positions related to the devaluation of the Egyptian Pound. See “Important Factors that May Impact Our Operating Results, Financial Condition or Cash Flows —Impact of Changes in Tax Laws or Their Interpretation” and Note 15 “Income Taxes” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

2016 Compared to 2015

Operating Income (Loss).Operating results for 2016 decreased $62.8 million compared to 2015, primarily due to lower utilization of our rig fleet, which reduced both contract drilling revenue and expense. Our operating results for 2016 reflected an aggregate impairment charge of $678.1 million compared to impairment charges aggregating $860.4 million in 2015. As a result of the impairment charges in 2015 and 2016 and resulting lower depreciable asset base, depreciation expense decreased $111.4 million in 2016 compared to 2015.

Contract drilling revenue decreased $835.0 million, during 2016, compared to 2015, due to depressed market conditions in all floater markets and for ourjack-up rig. Operating results for 2016 reflected an aggregate of 2,577 fewer revenue-earning days compared to 2015, and lower average daily revenue earned by our ultra-deepwater and deepwater floater fleets. Average daily revenue increased for ourmid-water andjack-up fleets primarily due to the favorable settlement of a contractual dispute and receipt ofloss-of-hire insurance proceeds, each in 2016.

Total contract drilling expense for 2016 decreased $455.7 million compared to 2015, reflecting our lower cost structure due to additional rigs idled, cold stacked or retired during 2015 and 2016, as well as the favorable impact of our cost control initiatives. The reduction in contract drilling expense during 2016 included lower costs associated with labor and personnel ($222.9 million), repairs and maintenance ($63.1 million), mobilization ($71.3 million), shorebase and operational support ($48.1 million), freight ($17.4 million), revenue-based agency fees ($16.1 million), inspections ($8.9 million), and other rig operating expenses ($7.9 million), including rig stacking costs and late start penalties recognized in 2015.

Impairment of Assets. During 2016, we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $678.1 million related to the carrying values of eight rigs, including related rig spares and supplies. In 2015, we recorded an aggregate impairment loss of $860.4 million related to 17 of our rigs, consisting of two ultra-deepwater, one deepwater and ninemid-water floaters and fivejack-up rigs. See “— Critical Accounting Estimates —Property, Plant and Equipment” and Note 2 “Asset Impairments” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

Restructuring and Separation Costs.During the first quarter of 2015, our management approved and initiated a reduction in workforce at our onshore bases and corporate facilities, which resulted in the recognition of $9.8 million in restructuring and other employee separation related costs in 2015.

Income Tax Expense.Our effective tax rate for 2016 was 20.5% compared to a 28.1% effective tax rate for 2015. The variance in the tax rate was due to differences in the mix of our domestic and internationalpre-tax earnings and losses, including asset impairments taken during both 2016 and 2015 in various jurisdictions, with differing tax consequences. The 2016 period was also favorably impacted by a $43.0 million adjustment, primarily related to our Egyptian tax liability for uncertain tax positions related to the devaluation of the Egyptian Pound.

Contract Drilling Revenue and Expense by Equipment Type

2017 Compared to 2016

Ultra-Deepwater Floaters.Revenue generated by our ultra-deepwater floaters increased $101.0 million during 2017 compared to 2016, primarily as a result of 472 incremental revenue-earning days ($225.2 million), partially offset by lower average daily revenue earned ($124.2 million). Revenue-earning days increased primarily due to incremental revenue-earning days for theOcean GreatWhite (351 days), which went on contract during the first quarter of 2017, and theOcean BlackRhino,which was warm-stacked for much of 2016 (275 days) before commencing its current contract, and fewer days associated with downtime for repairs (89 days). The increase in 2017 revenue-earning days was partially offset by incremental downtime for theOcean Monarch, which was in the shipyard for a survey and contract modifications during the first half of 2017 (168 days), and the absence of revenue-earning days for two cold-stacked rigs that had worked in 2016 (78 days). Average daily revenue decreased during 2017, primarily due to the absence of $40.0 million in demobilization revenue recognized in 2016 for theOcean Endeavor and the effect of lower dayrates earned under new contracts for both theOcean Monarchand Ocean BlackRhino during 2017, compared to 2016.

Contract drilling expense for our ultra-deepwater floaters increased $67.0 million during 2017, compared to 2016, primarily due to incremental contract drilling expense for theOcean GreatWhite($37.0 million), incremental costs associated with the PCbtH program on our drillships ($27.8 million), higher costs for rig mobilization ($14.0 million) and labor and personnel ($5.9 million), combined with a net increase in other rig operating costs ($2.5 million). These increased costs for our ultra-deepwater floaters were partially offset by a reduction in repair and maintenance expenses ($5.6 million) and costs associated with international shorebases and overhead costs ($14.5 million).

Deepwater Floaters.Revenue generated by our deepwater floaters decreased $54.7 million in 2017, compared to 2016, primarily due to a reduction in average daily revenue earned ($63.8 million), partially offset by the effect of 30 incremental revenue-earning days ($9.2 million). Average daily revenue decreased during 2017, primarily as a result of a lower dayrate being earned by theOcean Valiant under its current contract in the North Sea that commenced in the fourth quarter of 2016. Revenue-earning days increased primarily due to 218 incremental days for our active deepwater floaters, partially offset by 188 fewer days for theOcean Victory, which had been under contract during 2016.

Contract drilling expense for our deepwater floaters decreased $33.6 million during 2017, compared to 2016, primarily due to a net reduction in costs associated with labor and personnel ($14.2 million), maintenance and repairs ($11.2 million), equipment rental ($2.6 million), freight ($1.4 million) and other rig operating and overhead costs ($4.2 million) attributable to various factors, including the cold stacking of rigs and implementation of cost control initiatives for our working rigs and shorebase operations in 2016.

Mid-Water Floaters.Revenue and contract drilling expense during 2017 for ourmid-water floaters decreased $111.2 million and $15.1 million, respectively, compared to 2016. The decrease in revenue during 2017 resulted from 282 fewer revenue-earning days ($96.5 million), combined with a lower average daily revenue earned ($14.4 million). The decrease in revenue-earning days primarily related to the completion of the final contract for theOcean Ambassador in March 2016 (78 days) and fewer days for both theOcean Guardian, which was warm stacked between contracts for much of 2017 (166 days), and theOcean Patriot(38 days),which commenced a shipyard project and survey in late 2017. The decrease in contract drilling expense was primarily due to reduced costs related to theOcean Ambassador ($8.1 million), and a reduction in labor and personnel ($5.6 million) and other costs ($1.5 million) for the remainder of ourmid-water rigs. Only two rigs remain in ourmid-water fleet, both of which operated under contract for portions of 2017 and 2016, while the remainder of ourmid-water fleet was cold stacked and has now been sold.periods.


Jack-ups.Contract drilling revenue attributable to our current and previously-ownedjack-up rigs decreased $9.1 million during 2017, compared to 2016. TheOcean Scepter, which had been idle since completion of its previous contract in 2016, returned to Mexico for a new contract in early 2017 and operated until November 2017 at a lower dayrate than previously earned ($4.1 million). The rig was relocated to the Gulf of Mexico in late 2017 and is currently being

marketed for sale. The decrease in contract drilling revenue also reflected the absence of $4.9 million inloss-of-hire insurance proceeds recognized in 2016.

Contract drilling expense for ourjack-up rigs increased $7.6 million during 2017, compared to 2016, primarily due to higher costs incurred by theOcean Scepter for labor and personnel ($6.4 million) and repairs ($1.7 million), partially offset by reduced costs associated with sold rigs ($0.5 million).

2016 Compared to 2015

Ultra-Deepwater Floaters.Revenue generated by our ultra-deepwater floaters during 2016 decreased $349.9 million compared to 2015, primarily as a result of 616 fewer revenue-earning days ($306.8 million), combined with lower average daily revenue earned ($43.1 million). Revenue-earning days for 2016 decreased primarily due to fewer revenue-earning days for cold-stacked rigs that had operated during 2015 (716 days) and theOcean Clipper,which was sold in late 2015 (245 days), and unplanned downtime for repairs (22 days). The aggregate decrease in revenue-earning days was partially offset by incremental revenue-earning days for our drillships (185 days), and theOcean Monarch, which was warm stacked for the first half of 2015 (182 days). Average daily revenue decreased in 2016 primarily due to lower amortized mobilization and contract preparation revenue compared to 2015.

Contract drilling expense for our entire ultra-deepwater floater fleet decreased $125.6 million during 2016, compared to 2015 and was net of incremental contract drilling expense of $74.9 million attributable to our four drillships and theOcean GreatWhite,which was placed in service in late 2016. Contract drilling expense for our other ultra-deepwater floaters decreased $200.5 million during 2016, compared to 2015, reflecting lower expense for labor and personnel ($92.7 million), maintenance and inspections ($38.5 million), mobilization ($26.8 million), shorebase and operational support ($16.2 million), freight ($9.8 million), revenue-based agency fees ($8.2 million), and other rig operating and overhead costs ($8.3 million). These reductions in contract drilling expense were primarily due to lower costs for our cold-stacked rigs and theOcean Clipper, as well as other cost reduction initiatives.

Deepwater Floaters.Revenue generated by our deepwater floaters decreased $291.7 million in 2016, compared to 2015, primarily due to 495 fewer revenue-earning days ($202.9 million), combined with a lower average daily revenue earned ($88.7 million). The net reduction in revenue-earning days in 2016 reflected 782 fewer days for cold-stacked rigs that had operated in 2015, partially offset by incremental revenue-earning days for other deepwater rigs with contracts that commenced inmid-2015 and in 2016. Average daily revenue decreased primarily as a result of lower amortized mobilization and contract preparation fees ($21.9 million), combined with lower dayrates earned by theOcean Valiant andOcean Apex during 2016 compared to 2015.

Contract drilling expense incurred by our deepwater floaters decreased $128.8 million during 2016, compared to 2015, primarily due to lower costs associated with cold-stacked rigs and cost control initiative in our onshore bases and corporate facilities. Compared to 2015, contract drilling expense in 2016 for our deepwater floaters reflected reductions in costs for labor and personnel ($51.3 million), mobilization of rigs ($29.5 million), repairs, maintenance and inspections ($18.7 million), shorebase and operational support ($15.1 million), revenue-based agency fees ($4.4 million), freight ($4.1 million) and other operating costs ($5.7 million).

Mid-Water Floaters.Revenue generated by ourmid-water floaters during 2016 decreased $138.7 million compared to 2015, primarily due to 706 fewer revenue-earning days ($191.0 million), partially offset by higher average daily revenue earned ($52.0 million), which included a $36.0 million settlement received in connection with a contractual dispute with a former customer. Revenue-earning days decreased in 2016, primarily due to fewermid-water floaters operating under contracts during 2016 (three rigs) compared to 2015 (nine rigs).

Contract drilling expense for ourmid-water floaters decreased $146.4 million in 2016, compared to 2015, reflecting a reduction in costs attributable to rigs that have been retired ($109.0 million). Other cost reductions in 2016, compared to 2015, include lower costs for labor and personnel ($19.1 million), maintenance, repairs and inspections ($9.9 million),

shorebase and operational support ($6.1 million) and other ($2.3 million), primarily due to lower activity and cost control initiatives.

Jack-ups.Contract drilling revenue and expense for ourjack-up fleet decreased $54.7 million and $47.8 million, respectively, during 2016 compared to 2015. Revenue-earning days decreased by 760 days due to the cold stacking of three rigs that operated under contract during 2015 and an early contract termination for theOcean Scepter in 2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We principally rely on our cash flows from operations and cash reserves to meet our liquidity needs. We may also utilize borrowings under our $1.5 billion syndicated revolving credit agreement, or Credit Agreement. See “— Credit Agreement.”

Based on our cash available for current operations and contractual backlog of $2.4 billion, as of January 1, 2018, of which $1.2 billion is expected to be realized in 2018, we believe future capital spending and debt service requirements will be funded fromDuring 2019, our cash and cash equivalents future operatingand marketable securities decreased an aggregate $300.8 million and during 2018 increased an aggregate $74.0 million. Based on our cash flow forecast, as of the date of this report, we expect to generate aggregate negative cash flows for 2020 and borrowingsto begin to utilize borrowing under our Credit Agreement, as needed.two credit facilities in the first half of 2020 to meet our liquidity requirements. We anticipate ending 2020 with a drawn balance on our $950.0 million revolving credit facility. If market conditions do not improve, we could continue to generate aggregate negative cash flows in future periods. See “— “– Sources and Uses of CashCapital ExpendituresCredit Agreements.

Our worldwide cash balances are available to finance both our domestic and “Risk Factors —We can provide no assurance that our drilling contracts will not be terminated early or that our current backlog of contract drilling revenue will be ultimately realized” in Item 1A of this report.

To the extent available,foreign activities. If and when circumstances require, we expect to utilizerecord the operating cash flows generated bywithholding income tax impact associated with the potential distribution of earnings of our foreign subsidiaries; however, we have not provided income tax on the outside basis difference of our international subsidiaries as management does not intend to dispose of these subsidiaries and cash reserves of DFAC and the operating cash flows availablestructuring alternatives exist to and cash reserves of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. to meet each entity’s respective working capital requirements and capital commitments. mitigate any potential liability should a disposition take place.

At December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015,2019, we had cash available for current operations of $156.3 million. In addition, as follows:of January 1, 2020, our contractual backlog was $1.6 billion, of which $0.8 billion is expected to be realized during 2020.

   December 31, 
   2017   2016   2015 
   (In thousands) 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $376,037   $156,233   $119,028 

Marketable securities

       35    11,518 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cash available for current operations

  $376,037   $156,268   $130,546 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

A substantialWe have historically invested a significant portion of our cash flows has historically been invested in the enhancement of our drilling fleet including $1.6 billion since 2015 for the construction of two newbuild rigs and otherour ongoing rig equipment replacement and capital enhancement projects. We determine themaintenance programs. The amount of cash required to meet our capital commitments is determined by evaluating our rig construction obligations, the need to upgrade our rigs to meet specific customer requirements and our ongoing rig equipment enhancement/enhancement, maintenance and replacement programs. We also make periodic assessments of our capital spending programs based on current and expected industry conditions and make adjustments thereto if required.our cash flow forecast.

Based on our cash available and contractual backlog, we believe our 2020 capital spending and debt service requirements will be funded from a combination of our cash and cash equivalents, future operating cash flows and borrowings under our credit agreements. See “— “– Sources and Uses of CashUpgrades and Other Capital Expenditures.”

We pay dividends at the discretion of our Board of Directors, or Board, and any determination to declare a dividend, as well as the amount of any dividend that may be declared, will be based on the Board’s consideration of our financial position, earnings, earnings outlook, capital spending plans, outlook on current and future market conditions and business needs and other factors that our Board considers relevant at that time. Our dividend policy may change from time to time, and there can be no assurance that we will declare any cash dividends at all or in any particular amounts. See “Risk Factors —Although we have paid cash dividends in the past, we did not pay any dividends in 2017 and we may not pay dividends in the future and we can give no assurance as to the amount or timing of the payment of any future dividends” in Item 1A of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference. We did not pay any dividends in 2017 or 2016. We paid regular cash dividends in the aggregate amount of $68.6 million during 2015.

Depending on market conditions, we may, from time to time, purchase shares of our common stock in the open market or otherwise. We did not purchase any of our outstanding common stock during 2017, 2016 or 2015.

During 2016, we entered into foursale-and-leaseback transactions for certain well control equipment on our drillships and received proceeds of $210.0 million. See “— Contractual Cash Obligations —Pressure Control by the Hour®Expenditures.”

We may, from time to time, issue debt or equity securities, or a combination thereof, to finance capital expenditures, the acquisition of assets and businesses or for general corporate purposes. We have a shelf registration statement under which we may publicly issue from time to time up to $750 million of debt, equity or hybrid securities. Our ability to access the capital markets by issuing debt or equity securities will be dependent on our results of operations, our current financial condition, current credit ratings, current market conditions and other factors beyond our control.control at such time.

Sources and Uses of Cash

Our cash flow from operations and capital expenditures for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017 was as follows:

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2017   2016   2015 
   (In thousands) 

Cash flow from operations

  $493,808   $646,554   $736,427 

Capital expenditures:

      

Drillship construction

  $   $55,426   $454,093 

Construction of ultra-deepwater floater

       503,172    55,805 

Rig equipment and replacement program

   139,581    94,075    320,757 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital expenditures

  $139,581   $652,673   $830,655 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash Flow from Operations. Operations. Cash flow from operations decreased approximately $152.7for 2019 was $9.1 million, during 2017,or a decrease of $223.0 million compared to 2016, primarily due2018, reflecting the effects of the protracted downturn in the offshore contract drilling industry. Our cash flows for 2019, compared to 2018, reflected lower cash receipts fromfor contract drilling services ($245.0194.2 million) and, higher income taxes paid,tax payments, net of refunds, primarily in our foreign tax jurisdictions ($26.316.9 million), partially offset by a $118.6 million net decrease inand higher cash payments forexpenditures related to contract drilling, shorebase support and general and administrative expenses, including personnel-related, repairscosts ($11.8 million).

Upgrades and maintenance, shorebase, overheadsOther Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures during 2019 were $326.1 million and other rigwere funded from our operating costs. The decline in both cash receiptsflows and cash payments related to the performance of contract drilling services reflects continued depressed market conditions in the offshore drilling industry, as well as the positive results of our focus on controlling costs.

Cash flow from operations decreased approximately $89.9 million during 2016, compared to 2015, primarily due to lower cash receipts from contract drilling services ($704.9 million), partially offset by a $584.8 million net decrease in cash payments for contract drilling and general and administrative expenses, including personnel-related, maintenance, mobilization, shorebase and operational support and other rig operating costs and lower income taxes paid, net of refunds ($30.2 million). The decline in both cash receipts from and cash payments related to contract drilling services reflects an aggregate decline in our contract drilling operations, as well as a lower cost structure and implementation of our cost control initiatives.

See “— Results of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.”

Capital Expenditures.available cash. As of the date of this report, we expect totalcash capital expenditures for 2018in 2020 to aggregatebe approximately $220.0$190 million forto $210 million. Planned spending in 2020 associated with projects under our ongoing capital maintenance and replacement programs. programs includes equipment upgrades for the Ocean BlackRhino and Ocean BlackLion and costs associated with the completion of the reactivation and upgrade of the Ocean Onyx.


Credit Agreements. We expect to fund our 2018 capital spending from our operating cash flowscurrently have approximately $1.2 billion, in the aggregate, available under two credit facilities, of which $225.0 million matures in October 2020, which we may have difficulty replacing upon maturity, and our cash reserves.

Credit Agreement

Our Credit Agreement provides for a $1.5 billion senior unsecured revolving$950.0 million matures in October 2023. These credit facilityagreements may be used for general corporate purposes, maturing on October 22, 2020, except for $40including investments, acquisitions and capital expenditures. The $950.0 million facility includes a swingline subfacility of commitments that mature on March 17, 2019$100.0 million and $60 milliona letter of commitments that mature on October 22, 2019.credit subfacility in the amount of $250.0 million. As of December 31, 2017, we had2019, there were no borrowings

amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement,credit agreements; however, in January 2020, a $6.0 million financial letter of credit was issued under the $950.0 million facility’s letter of credit subfacility in support of an outstanding surety bond.

We are subject to various restrictive covenants and we were in compliance with all covenant requirements. As of February 9, 2018, we had no borrowings outstanding and $1.5 billion availableborrowing limitations under our Credit Agreementcredit agreements, and repayment of borrowings under our credit agreements is subject to provide short-term liquidity for our payment obligations.acceleration upon the occurrence of an event of default.

Senior Notes

Notes. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had an aggregate $2.0 billion in long-term, unsecured senior notes outstanding which will mature at various times beginning in 2023 through 2043.

During 2017, we issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured 7.875% senior notes due 2025, or 2025 Notes, and received net proceeds of $489.1 million after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and expenses. The 2025 Notes bear interest at 7.875% per year and mature on August 15, 2025. Interest on the 2025 Notes is payable semiannually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year, beginning February 15, 2018. We used the net proceeds from the 2025 Notes, together with cash on hand, to fund the redemption of our 5.875% senior notes due 2019 at a redemption price of $543.0 million. See Note 9 “Credit AgreementAgreements and Senior Notes” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

During 2015, we repaid maturing senior notes of $250.0 million.

Credit Ratings

In July 2017, Moody’s Investor Services downgraded our corporate credit rating to Ba3 with a negative outlook from Ba2 with a stable outlook. In October 2017, S&P Global Ratings, orSeptember 2019, S&P downgraded our corporate and senior unsecured notes credit ratings to CCC+ from B.  The rating outlook from S&P changed to stable from negative. Our current corporate credit rating to B+ fromBB-; Moody’s is B2 and our current senior unsecured notes credit rating from Moody’s is B3. The rating outlook by S&P remainsfrom Moody’s is negative. These credit ratings are below investment grade. Market conditionsgrade and other factors, many of which are outside of our control, could cause our credit ratings to be lowered further. Any further downgrade in our credit ratings could adversely impactraise our cost of issuing additional debt and the amount of additional debt that we could issue, and could further restrict our access to capital markets and our ability to raise funds by issuing additional debt. As a consequence,financing. Consequently, we may not be able to issue additional debt in amounts and/or with terms that we consider to be reasonable. One or more of these occurrencesThese ratings could limit our ability to pursue other business opportunities.opportunities or to refinance our indebtedness as it matures.

Contractual Cash Obligations

The following table sets forth our contractual cash obligations at December 31, 2017.2019 (in thousands).

 

   Payments Due By Period 

Contractual Obligations (1)

  Total   Less than 1 year   1–3 years   4–5 years   After 5 years 
   (In thousands) 

Long-term debt (principal and interest)

  $3,944,375   $113,063   $226,125   $226,125   $3,379,063 

PCbtH program

   550,000    65,000    130,000    130,000    225,000 

Property leases

   2,587    1,733    762    92     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total obligations

  $4,496,962   $179,796   $356,887   $356,217   $3,604,063 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due By Period

 

Contractual Obligations(1)

 

Total

 

 

Less than

1 year

 

 

1 – 3 years

 

 

4 – 5 years

 

 

After 5

years

 

Long-term debt (principal and interest)

 

$

3,718,251

 

 

$

113,063

 

 

$

226,125

 

 

$

467,500

 

 

$

2,911,563

 

Well Control Equipment services agreement

 

 

250,383

 

 

 

39,221

 

 

 

78,227

 

 

 

78,334

 

 

 

54,601

 

Operating leases

 

 

209,592

 

 

 

33,952

 

 

 

62,649

 

 

 

61,207

 

 

 

51,784

 

Total obligations

 

$

4,178,226

 

 

$

186,236

 

 

$

367,001

 

 

$

607,041

 

 

$

3,017,948

 

 

(1)

The above table excludes $105.0$148.8 million of total net unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2017.2019. Due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash outflows associated with the liabilities recognized in these balances, we are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities.

Tax Reform Act.At December 31, 2017, we had no current income tax liability with respect to the deemed repatriation of earnings or other provisions of the Tax Reform Act. See “Important Factors that May Impact Our Operating Results, Financial Condition or Cash Flows —Impact of Changes in Tax Laws or Their Interpretation” and Note 15 “Income Taxes” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.

Pressure Control by the Hour®Hour®. In 2016, we entered into aten-year agreement with a subsidiary of Baker Hughes Company (formerly known as Baker Hughes, a GE Oil & Gas,company), or GE,Baker Hughes, to provide services with respect to certain blowout preventer and related well control equipment, or Well Control Equipment,on our four drillships. Such services include management of maintenance, certification and reliability with respect to such equipment.equipment. In connection with the contractual services agreement, with GE, we sold the equipment Well Control Equipment on our drillships to a GE affiliate for an aggregate $210.0 millionBaker Hughes subsidiary and are leasing it back such equipment over separateten-year operating leases.leases for approximately $26 million per year in the aggregate. Collectively, we refer to the contractualservices agreement with GE and thecorresponding operating lease agreements with the GEBaker Hughes affiliate as the “PCbtH program.” See Note 12 “Sale10 “Commitments and Leaseback Transactions”Contingencies” and Note 11 “Leases and Lease Commitments” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.


Except for our contractual requirements under the PCbtH program discussed above, we had no other purchase obligations for major rig upgrades or any other significant obligations at December 31, 2017,2019, except for those related to our direct rig operations, which arise during the normal course of business.

Other Commercial Commitments - Letters of Credit

We were contingently liable as of December 31, 20172019 in the amount of $20.4$37.1 million under certain tax, performance, tax, supersedeas, bidVAT and customs bonds and letters of credit. Agreements relating to approximately $14.8$28.5 million of supersedeas,customs, tax, VAT and customssupersedeas bonds can require collateral at any time.time, while the remaining agreements, aggregating $8.6 million, cannot require collateral except in events of default. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had not been required to make any collateral deposits with respect to these agreements. The remaining agreements cannot require collateral exceptHowever, in events of default. Banks have issued lettersJanuary 2020, we were required to issue a $6.0 million financial letter of credit onas collateral in support of our behalf securing certain of theseoutstanding surety bonds. The table below provides a list of these obligations in U.S. dollar equivalents and their time to expiration.expiration (in thousands).

 

       For the Years Ending
December 31,
 
   Total       2018           2019     
   (In thousands) 

Other Commercial Commitments

      

Performance bond

  $1,000   $   $1,000 

Supersedeas bond

   9,189    9,189     

Tax bond

   5,408    5,408     

Bid bond

   3,200    3,200     

Other

   1,649    1,649     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total obligations

  $20,446   $19,446   $1,000 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ending December 31,

 

 

 

Total

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

Other Commercial Commitments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax bonds

 

$

25,634

 

 

$

6,058

 

 

$

3,241

 

 

$

16,335

 

Performance bonds

 

 

7,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,100

 

 

 

 

Supersedeas bonds

 

 

2,600

 

 

 

2,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customs bonds

 

 

1,446

 

 

 

1,446

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

312

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

 

 

 

88

 

Total obligations

 

$

37,092

 

 

$

10,328

 

 

$

10,341

 

 

$

16,423

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, we had nooff-balance sheet debt or otheroff-balance sheet arrangements.

Other

Operations Outside the U.S. Our operations outside the U.S. accounted for approximately 47%, 41% and 58% of our total consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See “Risk Factors – Significant portions of our operations are conducted outside the U.S. and involve additional risks not associated with U.S. domestic operations” in Item 1A of this report.

Currency Risk.Some of our subsidiaries conduct a portion of their operations in the local currency of the country where they conduct operations, resulting in foreign currency exposure. Currency environments in which we currently have or previously had significant business operations include Australia, Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, Mexico, Trinidad and Tobago and the U.K., creating exposure to certain monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. These assets and liabilities are revalued based on currency exchange rates at the end of the reporting period.

To reduce our currency exchange risk, we may, if possible, arrange for a portion of our international contracts to be payable to us in local currency in amounts equal to our estimated operating costs payable in local currency, with the balance of the contract payable in U.S. dollars. At present, however, only a limited number of our contracts are payable both in U.S. dollars and the local currency. Historically, to the extent that we have not been able to cover our local currency operating costs with customer payments in the local currency, we have also utilized foreign currency forward exchange, or FOREX, contracts to reduce our currency exchange risk. We currently have no outstanding FOREX contracts.

We record currency transaction gains and losses and gains and losses arising from the settlement of our FOREX contracts that have been designated as cash flow hedges as “Foreign currency transaction (loss) gain” and “Contract drilling, excluding depreciation” expense, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The revaluation of liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar related to foreign income taxes, including deferred tax assets and liabilities and uncertain tax positions, is reported as a component of “Income tax benefit,”benefit” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.


Forward-Looking Statements

We or our representatives may, from time to time, either in this report, in periodic press releases or otherwise, make or incorporate by reference certain written or oral statements that are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may project, indicate or imply future results, events, performance or achievements, and may contain or be identified by the words “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” “project,” “forecast,” “budget” and similar expressions. In addition, any statement concerning future financial performance (including, without limitation, future revenues, earnings or growth rates), ongoing business strategies or prospects, and possible actions taken by or against us which may be provided by management, are also forward-looking statements as so defined. Statements made by us in this report that contain forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations and statements about the following subjects:

market conditions and the effect of such conditions on our future results of operations;

sources and uses of and requirements for financial resources and sources of liquidity;

contractual obligations and future contract negotiations;

interest rate and foreign exchange risk;

operations outside the United States;

business strategy;

growth opportunities;

competitive position including, without limitation, competitive rigs entering the market;

expected financial position;

cash flows and contract backlog;

 

market conditions and the effect of such conditions on our future results of operations;

future dayrates

sources and termuses of and requirements for theOcean GreatWhite;financial resources and sources of liquidity;

idling drilling rigs or reactivating stacked rigs;

contractual obligations and future contract negotiations;

outcomes of legal proceedings;

interest rate and foreign exchange risk;

declaration and payment of dividends;

operations outside the United States;

financing plans;

business strategy;

competitive position including, without limitation, competitive rigs entering the market;

expected financial position;

market outlook;

cash flows and contract backlog;

tax planning and effects of the Tax Reform Act;

future amounts payable by a customer in the form of a guarantee of gross margin to be earned on future contracts or by direct payment, pursuant to terms of an existing contract, including the timing and revenue associated therewith;

debt levels and the impact of changes in the credit markets and credit ratings for our debt;

idling drilling rigs or reactivating stacked rigs;

budgets for capital and other expenditures;

outcomes of litigation and legal proceedings;

timing and duration of required regulatory inspections for our drilling rigs;

declaration and payment of dividends;

timing and cost of completion of capital projects;

financing plans;

delivery dates and drilling contracts related to capital projects or rig acquisitions;

market outlook;

plans and objectives of management;

tax planning and effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017;

scrapping retired rigs;

changes in tax laws and policies or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our tax returns;

assets held for sale;

debt levels and the impact of changes in the credit markets and credit ratings for us and our debt;

purchasing or constructing rigs;

budgets for capital and other expenditures;

asset impairments and impairment evaluations;

timing and duration of required regulatory inspections for our drilling rigs and other planned downtime;

our internal controls and internal control over financial reporting;

process and timing for acquiring regulatory permits and approvals for our drilling operations;

performance of contracts;

timing and cost of completion of capital projects;

purchases of our securities;

delivery dates and drilling contracts related to capital projects;

compliance with applicable laws;

plans and objectives of management;

scrapping retired rigs;

asset impairments and impairment evaluations;

assets held for sale;


our internal controls and internal control over financial reporting;

performance of contracts;

compliance with applicable laws; and

availability, limits and adequacy of insurance or indemnification.

These types of statements are based on current expectations about future events and inherently are subject to a variety of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expected, projected or expressed in forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among others, the following:

those described under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A;

general economic and business conditions and trends, including recessions and adverse changes in the level of international trade activity;

worldwide supply and demand for oil and natural gas;

the continuing protracted downturn in our industry and the expected continuation thereof;

changes in foreign and domestic oil and gas exploration, development and production activity;

worldwide supply and demand for oil and natural gas;

oil and natural gas price fluctuations and related market expectations;

changes in foreign and domestic oil and gas exploration, development and production activity;

the ability of OPEC to set and maintain production levels and pricing, and the level of production innon-OPEC countries;

oil and natural gas price fluctuations and related market expectations;

policies of various governments regarding exploration and development of oil and gas reserves;

the ability of OPEC+ to set and maintain production levels and pricing, and the level of production in non-OPEC+ countries;

policies of various governments regarding exploration and development of oil and gas reserves;

inability to obtain contracts for our rigs that do not have contracts;

inability to obtain contracts for our rigs that do not have contracts;

the inability to reactivate cold-stacked rigs;

the cancellation or renegotiation of contracts included in our reported contract backlog;

advances in exploration and development technology;

the worldwide political and military environment, including, for example, inoil-producing regions and locations where our rigs are operating or are in shipyards;

the worldwide political and military environment, including, for example, in oil-producing regions and locations where our rigs are operating or are in shipyards;

casualty losses;

operating hazards inherent in drilling for oil and gas offshore;

the risk that dividends may not be declared or paid;

the risk of physical damage to rigs and equipment caused by named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico;

the risk of physical damage to rigs and equipment caused by named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico;

industry fleet capacity;

industry fleet capacity;

market conditions in the offshore contract drilling industry, including, without limitation, dayrates and utilization levels;

market conditions in the offshore contract drilling industry, including, without limitation, dayrates and utilization levels;

competition;

competition;

changes in foreign, political, social and economic conditions;

changes in foreign, political, social and economic conditions;

risks of international operations, compliance with foreign laws and taxation policies and seizure, expropriation, nationalization, deprivation, malicious damage or other loss of possession or use of equipment and assets;

risks of international operations, compliance with foreign laws and taxation policies and seizure, expropriation, nationalization, deprivation, malicious damage or other loss of possession or use of equipment and assets;

risks of potential contractual liabilities pursuant to our various drilling contracts in effect from time to time;

risks of potential contractual liabilities pursuant to our various drilling contracts in effect from time to time;

customer or supplier bankruptcy, liquidation or other financial difficulties;

customer or supplier bankruptcy, liquidation or other financial difficulties;

the ability of customers and suppliers to meet their obligations to us and our subsidiaries;

the ability of customers and suppliers to meet their obligations to us and our subsidiaries;

collection of receivables;

collection of receivables;

foreign exchange and currency fluctuations and regulations, and the inability to repatriate income or capital;

risks of war, military operations, other armed hostilities, sabotage, piracy, cyber attack, terrorist acts and embargoes;

changes in offshore drilling technology, which could require significant capital expenditures in order to maintain competitiveness;

reallocation of drilling budgets away from offshore drilling in favor of other priorities such as shale or other land-based projects;

regulatory initiatives and compliance with governmental regulations including, without limitation, regulations pertaining to climate change, greenhouse gases, carbon emissions or energy use;

compliance with and liability under environmental laws and regulations;

uncertainties surrounding deepwater permitting and exploration and development activities;

potential changes in accounting policies by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, SEC, or regulatory agencies for our industry which may cause us to revise our financial accounting and/or disclosures in the future, and which may change the way analysts measure our business or financial performance;

development and increasing adoption of alternative fuels;

potential changes in accounting policies by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, or regulatory agencies for our industry which may cause us to revise our financial accounting and/or disclosures in the future, and which may change the way analysts measure our business or financial performance;

customer preferences;

development and exploitation of alternative fuels;

risks of litigation, tax audits and contingencies and the impact of compliance with judicial rulings and jury verdicts;

customer preferences;

cost, availability, limits and adequacy of insurance;

risks of litigation, tax audits and contingencies and the impact of compliance with judicial rulings and jury verdicts;

invalidity of assumptions used in the design of our controls and procedures and the risk that material weaknesses may arise in the future;

cost, availability, limits and adequacy of insurance;

business opportunities that may be presented to and pursued or rejected by us;

invalidity of assumptions used in the design of our controls and procedures and the risk that material weaknesses may arise in the future;

the results of financing efforts;

business opportunities that may be presented to and pursued or rejected by us;

adequacy and availability of our sources of liquidity;

the results of financing efforts;

risks resulting from our indebtedness;

adequacy and availability of our sources of liquidity;

public health threats;

risks resulting from our indebtedness;

negative publicity; and

public health threats;

negative publicity; and

impairments of assets.

The risks and uncertainties included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report and our other filings with the SEC include additional factors that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial performance. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements included in this report speak only as of the date of this report. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect any change in our expectations or beliefs with regard to the statement or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any forward-looking statement is based. In addition, in certain places in this report, we may refer to reports published byof third parties that purport to describe trends or developments in energy production or drilling and exploration activity. While we believe that each of these reports is reliable, we have not independently verified the information included in such reports. We specifically disclaim any responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of such information and undertake no obligation to update such information.

New Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, which are not yet effective, and their effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows, see Note 1 “General Information - Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted” to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this report.


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The information included in this Item 7A is considered to constitute “forward-looking statements” for purposes of the statutory safe harbor provided in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7 of this report.

Our measure of market risk exposure represents an estimate of the change in fair value of our financial instruments. Market risk exposure is presented for each class of financial instrument held by us at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, assuming immediate adverse market movements of the magnitude described below. We believe that the various rates of adverse market movements represent a measure of exposure to loss under hypothetically assumed adverse conditions. The estimated market risk exposure represents the hypothetical loss to future earnings and does not represent the maximum possible loss or any expected actual loss, even under adverse conditions, because actual adverse fluctuations would likely differ. In addition, since our investment portfolio is subject to change based on our portfolio management strategy as well as in response to changes in the market, these estimates are not necessarily indicative of the actual results that may occur.

Exposure to market risk is managed and monitored by our senior management. Senior management approves the overall investment strategy that we employ and has responsibility to ensure that the investment positions are consistent with that strategy and the level of risk acceptable to us. We may manage risk by buying or selling instruments or entering into offsetting positions.

Interest Rate Risk. We have exposure to interest rate risk arising from changes in the level or volatility of interest rates. Historically, ourOur investments in marketable securities were primarilyare in fixed maturity securities. securities, although we do not hold any marketable securities as of the date of this report. We monitor our sensitivity to interest rate risk by evaluating the change in the value of our financial assets and liabilities due to fluctuations in interest rates. Our exposureThe evaluation is performed by applying an instantaneous change in interest rates by varying magnitudes on a static balance sheet to determine the effect such risk was minimala change in 2017rates would have on the recorded market value of our investments and 2016 asthe resulting effect on stockholders’ equity. The analysis provides the sensitivity of the market value of our financial instruments to selected changes in market rates and prices which we had no investmentsbelieve are reasonably possible over a one-year period.

The sensitivity analysis estimates the change in marketable securities atthe market value of our interest sensitive assets and liabilities that were held on December 31, 20172019 and 2018, due to instantaneous parallel shifts in the fair valueyield curve of such securities was immaterial as100 basis points, with all other variables held constant.

The interest rates on certain types of December 31, 2016.assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Accordingly, the analysis may not be indicative of, is not intended to provide, and does not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on our earnings or stockholders’ equity. Further, the computations do not contemplate any actions we could undertake in response to changes in interest rates.

Our long-term debt, as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, is denominated in U.S. dollars. Our existing debt has been issued at fixed rates, and as such, interest expense would not be impacted by interest rate shifts. The impact of a100-basis point increase in interest rates on fixed rate debt would result in a decrease in market value of $145.1$89.7 million and $125.3$94.9 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. A100-basis point decrease would result in an increase in market value of $168.9$102.0 million and $147.3$108.6 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.

We are also subject to risk exposure related to the variable interest rates charged on our revolving credit arrangement,agreements, which are calculated on a base rate as defined in the respective credit agreement.

At December 31, 2018, our marketable securities included investments in U.S. Treasury bills with a fair value of $299.9 million. The impact of a 100-basis point increase or decrease in interest rates would not have had a significant impact on the market value of these securities. We had no such investments outstanding as of December 31, 2019.  


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

REPORTOFINDEPENDENTREGISTEREDPUBLICACCOUNTINGFIRM

Tothe Stockholders stockholders and the BoardofDirectorsofDiamondOffshoreDrilling,Inc. and Subsidiaries

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the related consolidated statements of income,operations, comprehensive income shareholders’or loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as “the financial statements”the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 13, 2018,11, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’sCompany's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets – Refer to Notes 1 and 3 to the financial statements.

Critical Audit Matter Description


The evaluation of drilling equipment, specifically drilling rigs, for impairment occurs whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, such as cold stacking a drilling rig, the expectation of cold stacking a drilling rig in the near term, contracted backlog of less than one year, a decision to retire or scrap a drilling rig, or excess spending over budget on a newbuild, construction project or major drilling rig upgrade.

When the Company determines that the carrying value of a drilling rig may not be recoverable, they prepare an undiscounted probability-weighted cash flow analysis to determine if there is a potential impairment. This analysis utilizes certain assumptions for each drilling rig under evaluation and considers multiple probability-weighted utilization and dayrate scenarios.  The Company’s development of the dayrate assumption involves judgments relative to the current and expected market for the drilling rigs and expectations of future oil and gas prices. The drilling and other property and equipment balance was $5.2 billion as of December 31, 2019, and no impairment expense was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019.

We identified impairment of drilling rigs as a critical audit matter because of the significant judgments made by management to identify indicators of impairment and to prepare probability-weighted cash flow analyses to determine if potential impairments exist. This required a high degree of auditor judgment, including the involvement of fair value specialists, and increased extent of effort related to evaluating indicators of impairment and dayrate used in the undiscounted probability-weighted cash flow analysis.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to (i) the identification of indicators of impairment and (ii) the evaluation of the Company’s undiscounted probability-weighted cash flow analysis for those drilling rigs with factors that indicated potential impairment included the following, among others:

We tested the effectiveness of relevant controls related to the Company’s identification of impairment indicators, and the Company’s review of the undiscounted probability-weighted cash flow analyses.

We evaluated the Company’s identification of impairment indicators by:

o

Corroborating information used in the identification of impairment indicators through independent inquiries of marketing and operations personnel and by performing an independent assessment of potential indicators of impairment utilizing the individual drilling rig history, asset class history for dayrates, backlog and potential drilling rig opportunities.

o

Considering industry and analysts reports and the impact of macroeconomic factors, such as future oil and gas prices, on the Company’s process for identifying indicators of impairment.  

o

Comparing the timing of impairments recorded by the Company with the timing of impairments recorded by the Company’s peers.  

With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the Company’s undiscounted probability-weighted cash flow analysis for those drilling rigs with factors that had indicators of potential impairment by:

o

Evaluating the reasonableness of the dayrate assumptions utilized in the Company’s probability-weighted undiscounted cash flow analyses by evaluating potential drilling rig opportunities and considering industry reports and data.

o

Comparing the assumptions used in the Company’s previous undiscounted probability-weighted cash flow analyses to the assumptions used in the current undiscounted probability-weighted cash flow analyses to assess for management bias.


Income Taxes – Refer to Notes 1 and 14 to the financial statements.

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with accounting standards that require the recognition of the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and an asset and liability approach in recognizing the amount of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been currently recognized in the financial statements or tax returns. In each of the tax jurisdictions, the Company recognized a current tax liability or asset for the estimated taxes payable or refundable on tax returns for the current year and a deferred tax asset or liability for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carryforwards. The deferred tax liability balance was $47.5 million as of December 31, 2019 and income tax benefit recorded in 2019 was $44.8 million.

In several of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates, certain wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into agreements with other wholly-owned subsidiaries to provide specialized service and equipment.  The Company applied transfer pricing methodologies to determine the amount to be charged for providing the services and equipment and utilized outside consultants to assist in the development of such transfer pricing methodologies. Each jurisdiction enacts laws, which, in many cases, allows for alternative transfer pricing methodologies, which may differ from the Company’s selected methodologies.  Alternative transfer pricing methodologies, if applied, could result in different chargeable amounts.

Given the multiple jurisdictions in which the Company files tax returns and the complexity of the tax laws and regulations, and transfer pricing methodologies applied to wholly-owned subsidiary transactions, auditing management’s estimates of income taxes in foreign jurisdictions required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the use of our tax specialists and audit teams in the local jurisdiction knowledgeable of the tax laws of the applicable country.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the Company’s application of transfer pricing methodologies, included the following, among others:

We evaluated the appropriateness and consistency of management’s methods and assumptions used in the application of its transfer pricing methodology, which included testing the effectiveness of the related internal controls.

We involved transfer pricing specialists to evaluate the reasonableness of transfer pricing methodologies utilized by the Company.

We tested the accuracy of transfer prices by recalculating the prices in accordance with the chosen methodology.

With the assistance of our income tax specialists and audit teams in the local jurisdiction knowledgeable of the tax laws of the applicable country, we evaluated management’s assertions with respect to the Company’s entitlement to the economic benefits associated with the tax positions resulting from the application of transfer pricing methodology.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston,Texas

February 13, 2018 11,2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1989.


REPORTOFINDEPENDENTREGISTEREDPUBLICACCOUNTINGFIRM

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Tothe Stockholders stockholders and the BoardofDirectorsofDiamondOffshoreDrilling,Inc. and Subsidiaries

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and subsidiaries’subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, of the Company and our report dated February 13, 2018,11, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas

February 13, 2018 11,2020


DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

  December 31, 

 

December 31,

 

  2017 2016 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

ASSETS   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $376,037  $156,233 

 

$

156,281

 

 

$

154,073

 

Marketable securities

 

 

 

 

 

299,849

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for bad debts

   256,730   247,028 

 

 

250,856

 

 

 

168,620

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   157,625   102,146 

 

 

68,658

 

 

 

163,396

 

Assets held for sale

   96,261   400 
  

 

  

 

 

Asset held for sale

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

   886,653   505,807 

 

 

476,795

 

 

 

785,938

 

Drilling and other property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation

   5,261,641   5,726,935 

 

 

5,152,828

 

 

 

5,184,222

 

Other assets

   102,276   139,135 

 

 

204,421

 

 

 

65,534

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets

  $6,250,570  $6,371,877 

 

$

5,834,044

 

 

$

6,035,694

 

  

 

  

 

 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

   

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

  $38,755  $30,242 

 

$

68,586

 

 

$

43,933

 

Accrued liabilities

   154,655   182,159 

 

 

210,780

 

 

 

172,228

 

Taxes payable

   29,878   23,898 

 

 

23,228

 

 

 

20,685

 

Short-term borrowings

      104,200 
  

 

  

 

 

Total current liabilities

   223,288   340,499 

 

 

302,594

 

 

 

236,846

 

Long-term debt

   1,972,225   1,980,884 

 

 

1,975,741

 

 

 

1,973,922

 

Deferred tax liability

   167,299   197,011 

 

 

47,528

 

 

 

104,380

 

Other liabilities

   113,497   103,349 

 

 

275,971

 

 

 

135,893

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

   2,476,309   2,621,743 

 

 

2,601,834

 

 

 

2,451,041

 

  

 

  

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

       

Stockholders’ equity:

   

Preferred stock (par value $0.01, 25,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding)

       

Common stock (par value $0.01, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 144,085,292 shares issued and 137,227,782 shares outstanding at December 31, 2017; 143,997,757 shares issued and 137,169,663 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016)

   1,441   1,440 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock (par value $0.01, 25,000,000 shares authorized,

NaN issued and outstanding)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock (par value $0.01, 500,000,000 shares authorized;

144,781,766 shares issued and 137,703,910 shares outstanding

at December 31, 2019; 144,383,662 shares issued and 137,438,353

shares outstanding at December 31, 2018)

 

 

1,448

 

 

 

1,444

 

Additionalpaid-in capital

   2,011,397   2,004,514 

 

 

2,024,347

 

 

 

2,018,143

 

Retained earnings

   1,964,497   1,946,765 

 

 

1,412,201

 

 

 

1,769,415

 

Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)

   (5  1 

Treasury stock, at cost (6,857,510 and 6,828,094 shares of common stock at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively)

   (203,069  (202,586
  

 

  

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) gain

 

 

(18

)

 

 

21

 

Treasury stock, at cost (7,077,856 and 6,945,309 shares of common

stock at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively)

 

 

(205,768

)

 

 

(204,370

)

Total stockholders’ equity

   3,774,261   3,750,134 

 

 

3,232,210

 

 

 

3,584,653

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $6,250,570  $6,371,877 

 

$

5,834,044

 

 

$

6,035,694

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  2017 2016 2015 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Revenues:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contract drilling

  $1,451,219  $1,525,214  $2,360,184 

 

$

934,934

 

 

$

1,059,973

 

 

$

1,451,219

 

Revenues related to reimbursable expenses

   34,527   75,128   59,209 

 

 

45,710

 

 

 

23,242

 

 

 

34,527

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total revenues

   1,485,746   1,600,342   2,419,393 

 

 

980,644

 

 

 

1,083,215

 

 

 

1,485,746

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating expenses:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contract drilling, excluding depreciation

   801,964   772,173   1,227,864 

 

 

793,412

 

 

 

722,834

 

 

 

801,964

 

Reimbursable expenses

   33,744   58,058   58,050 

 

 

45,016

 

 

 

22,917

 

 

 

33,744

 

Depreciation

   348,695   381,760   493,162 

 

 

355,596

 

 

 

331,789

 

 

 

348,695

 

General and administrative

   74,505   63,560   66,462 

 

 

67,878

 

 

 

85,351

 

 

 

74,505

 

Impairment of assets

   99,313   678,145   860,441 

 

 

 

 

 

27,225

 

 

 

99,313

 

Bad debt recovery

      (265   

Restructuring and separation costs

   14,146      9,778 

 

 

 

 

 

5,041

 

 

 

14,146

 

(Gain) loss on disposition of assets

   (10,500  3,795   (2,290
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loss (gain) on disposition of assets

 

 

1,072

 

 

 

241

 

 

 

(10,500

)

Total operating expenses

   1,361,867   1,957,226   2,713,467 

 

 

1,262,974

 

 

 

1,195,398

 

 

 

1,361,867

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating income (loss)

   123,879   (356,884  (294,074

Operating (loss) income

 

 

(282,330

)

 

 

(112,183

)

 

 

123,879

 

Other income (expense):

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

   2,473   768   3,322 

 

 

6,382

 

 

 

8,477

 

 

 

2,473

 

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized

   (113,528  (89,934  (93,934

 

 

(122,832

)

 

 

(123,240

)

 

 

(113,528

)

Foreign currency transaction (loss) gain

   (1,128  (11,522  2,465 

Loss on extinguishment of senior notes

   (35,366      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(35,366

)

Foreign currency transaction loss

 

 

(3,936

)

 

 

(379

)

 

 

(1,128

)

Other, net

   2,230   (10,727  873 

 

 

702

 

 

 

700

 

 

 

2,230

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loss before income tax benefit

   (21,440  (468,299  (381,348

 

 

(402,014

)

 

 

(226,625

)

 

 

(21,440

)

Income tax benefit

   39,786   95,796   107,063 

 

 

44,800

 

 

 

46,353

 

 

 

39,786

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss)

  $18,346  $(372,503 $(274,285
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Earnings (loss) per share:

    

Net (loss) income

 

$

(357,214

)

 

$

(180,272

)

 

$

18,346

 

(Loss) earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

  $0.13  $(2.72 $(2.00

 

$

(2.60

)

 

$

(1.31

)

 

$

0.13

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

  $0.13  $(2.72 $(2.00

 

$

(2.60

)

 

$

(1.31

)

 

$

0.13

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted-average shares outstanding:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares of common stock

   137,213   137,168   137,157 

 

 

137,652

 

 

 

137,399

 

 

 

137,213

 

Dilutive potential shares of common stock

   52       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total weighted-average shares outstanding

   137,265   137,168   137,157 

 

 

137,652

 

 

 

137,399

 

 

 

137,265

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME OR LOSS

(In thousands)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2017  2016  2015 

Net income (loss)

  $18,346  $(372,503 $(274,285

Other comprehensive (losses) gains, net of tax:

    

Derivative financial instruments:

    

Unrealized holding loss

         (1,574

Reclassification adjustment for (gain) loss included in net income (loss)

   (6  (5  5,084 

Investments in marketable securities:

    

Unrealized holding loss on investments

      (6,559  (4,940

Reclassification adjustment for loss included in net income (loss)

      11,600    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive (loss) gain

   (6  5,036   (1,430
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

  $18,340  $(367,467 $(275,715
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(357,214

)

 

$

(180,272

)

 

$

18,346

 

Other comprehensive gains (losses), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative financial instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassification adjustment for gain included in net

   (loss) income

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(6

)

Investments in marketable securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gain on investments

 

 

23

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

 

Reclassification adjustment for gain included

   in net (loss) income

 

 

(55

)

 

 

(37

)

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive (loss) gain

 

 

(39

)

 

 

26

 

 

 

(6

)

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

$

(357,253

)

 

$

(180,246

)

 

$

18,340

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except number of shares)

 

  

 

Common Stock

  Additional
Paid-In

Capital
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive

Gains (Losses)
  

 

Treasury Stock

  Total
Stockholders’

Equity
 
  Shares  Amount     Shares  Amount  

January 1, 2015

  143,960,260   1,440   1,993,898   2,661,999   (3,605  6,812,361   (202,169  4,451,563 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

           (274,285           (274,285

Dividends to stockholders ($0.50 per share)

           (68,578           (68,578

Stock-based compensation, net of tax

  18,617      5,736         7,810   (236  5,500 

Net gain on derivative financial instruments

              3,510         3,510 

Net loss on investments

              (4,940        (4,940
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

  143,978,877   1,440   1,999,634   2,319,136   (5,035  6,820,171   (202,405  4,112,770 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loss

           (372,503           (372,503

Anti-dilution adjustment

           132            132 

Stock-based compensation, net of tax

  18,880      4,880         7,923   (181  4,699 

Net loss on derivative financial instruments

              (5        (5

Net gain on investments

              5,041         5,041 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

  143,997,757  $1,440  $2,004,514  $1,946,765  $1   6,828,094  $(202,586 $3,750,134 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Impact of change in accounting policy

        634   (634            
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted balance at December 31, 2016

  143,997,757  $1,440  $2,005,148  $1,946,131  $1   6,828,094  $(202,586 $3,750,134 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

           18,346            18,346 

Anti-dilution adjustment

           20            20 

Stock-based compensation, net of tax

  87,535   1   6,249         29,416   (483  5,767 

Net loss on derivative financial instruments

              (6        (6
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

  144,085,292  $1,441  $2,011,397  $1,964,497  $(5  6,857,510  $(203,069 $3,774,261 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Paid-In

 

 

Retained

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

Treasury Stock

 

 

Stockholders’

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Earnings

 

 

Gains (Losses)

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Equity

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

143,997,757

 

 

$

1,440

 

 

$

2,004,514

 

 

$

1,946,765

 

 

$

1

 

 

 

6,828,094

 

 

$

(202,586

)

 

$

3,750,134

 

Impact of change in

   accounting principle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

634

 

 

 

(634

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted balance at

   January 1, 2017

 

 

143,997,757

 

 

$

1,440

 

 

$

2,005,148

 

 

$

1,946,131

 

 

$

1

 

 

 

6,828,094

 

 

$

(202,586

)

 

$

3,750,134

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,346

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,346

 

Anti-dilution

   adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

Stock-based

   compensation, net

   of tax

 

 

87,535

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

6,249

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,416

 

 

 

(483

)

 

 

5,767

 

Net loss on derivative

   financial instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

December 31, 2017

 

 

144,085,292

 

 

$

1,441

 

 

$

2,011,397

 

 

$

1,964,497

 

 

$

(5

)

 

 

6,857,510

 

 

$

(203,069

)

 

$

3,774,261

 

Impact of change in

   accounting principle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,812

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,812

)

Adjusted balance at

   January 1, 2018

 

 

144,085,292

 

 

$

1,441

 

 

$

2,011,397

 

 

$

1,949,685

 

 

$

(5

)

 

 

6,857,510

 

 

$

(203,069

)

 

$

3,759,449

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(180,272

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(180,272

)

Anti-dilution

   adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Stock options exercised

 

 

3,773

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based

   compensation, net

   of tax

 

 

294,597

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

6,746

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

87,799

 

 

 

(1,301

)

 

 

5,448

 

Net loss on derivative

   financial instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

Net gain on

   investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

144,383,662

 

 

$

1,444

 

 

$

2,018,143

 

 

$

1,769,415

 

 

$

21

 

 

 

6,945,309

 

 

$

(204,370

)

 

$

3,584,653

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(357,214

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(357,214

)

Stock-based

   compensation, net

   of tax

 

 

398,104

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

6,204

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

132,547

 

 

 

(1,398

)

 

 

4,810

 

Net loss on derivative

   financial instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

Net loss on

    investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(32

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(32

)

December 31, 2019

 

 

144,781,766

 

 

$

1,448

 

 

$

2,024,347

 

 

$

1,412,201

 

 

$

(18

)

 

 

7,077,856

 

 

$

(205,768

)

 

$

3,232,210

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

  2017 2016 2015 

Operating activities:

    

Net income (loss)

  $18,346  $(372,503 $(274,285

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(357,214

)

 

$

(180,272

)

 

$

18,346

 

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

   348,695   381,760   493,162 

 

 

355,596

 

 

 

331,789

 

 

 

348,695

 

Loss on impairment of assets

   99,313   678,145   860,441 

 

 

 

 

 

27,225

 

 

 

99,313

 

Loss on extinguishment of senior notes

   35,366       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,366

 

Restructuring and separation costs

   14,146       

 

 

 

 

 

1,478

 

 

 

14,146

 

(Gain) loss on disposition of assets

   (10,500  3,795   (2,290

Loss on sale of marketable securities, net

      12,146    

Loss on foreign currency forward exchange contracts

         8,364 

Loss (gain) on disposition of assets

 

 

1,072

 

 

 

241

 

 

 

(10,500

)

Deferred tax provision

   (72,127  (106,263  (242,034

 

 

(56,908

)

 

 

(75,993

)

 

 

(72,127

)

Stock-based compensation expense

   6,250   4,880   4,856 

 

 

6,208

 

 

 

6,749

 

 

 

6,250

 

Deferred income, net

   8,676   (29,108  (45,383

Deferred expenses, net

   46,337   (20,155  (26,405

Contract liabilities, net

 

 

27,578

 

 

 

183

 

 

 

8,676

 

Contract assets, net

 

 

2,625

 

 

 

(6,221

)

 

 

 

Deferred contract costs, net

 

 

59,141

 

 

 

22,765

 

 

 

46,337

 

Long-term employee remuneration programs

 

 

3,169

 

 

 

547

 

 

 

3,801

 

Other assets, noncurrent

   (326  (4,914  2,483 

 

 

52

 

 

 

(1,307

)

 

 

(326

)

Other liabilities, noncurrent

   (963  (31  (3,890

 

 

6,514

 

 

 

(3,217

)

 

 

(963

)

Payments of settlement of foreign currency forward exchange contracts designated as accounting hedges

         (8,364

Other

   7,708   5,691   858 

 

 

2,380

 

 

 

1,013

 

 

 

3,907

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

   (11,049  159,098   58,872 

 

 

(37,832

)

 

 

87,970

 

 

 

(11,049

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   (1,291  6,187   19,195 

 

 

(1,170

)

 

 

6,211

 

 

 

(1,291

)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

   19,803   (71,085  (180,872

 

 

3,897

 

 

 

(7,587

)

 

 

19,803

 

Taxes payable

   (14,576  (1,089  71,719 

 

 

(6,019

)

 

 

20,484

 

 

 

(14,576

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   493,808   646,554   736,427 

 

 

9,089

 

 

 

232,058

 

 

 

493,808

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Investing activities:

    

Investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures (including rig construction)

   (139,581  (652,673  (830,655

 

 

(326,090

)

 

 

(222,406

)

 

 

(139,581

)

Proceeds from disposition of assets, net of disposal costs

   15,196   221,722   13,049 

 

 

16,217

 

 

 

70,067

 

 

 

15,196

 

Proceeds from sale and maturities of marketable securities

   35   4,614   51 

 

 

2,300,000

 

 

 

1,600,000

 

 

 

35

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Purchase of marketable securities

 

 

(1,996,996

)

 

 

(1,895,997

)

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (124,350  (426,337  (817,555

 

 

(6,869

)

 

 

(448,336

)

 

 

(124,350

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Financing activities:

    

Repayment of long-term debt

   (500,000     (250,000

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redemption of senior notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(500,000

)

Payment of debt extinguishment costs

   (34,395      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(34,395

)

Proceeds from issuance of senior notes

   496,360       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

496,360

 

(Repayment of) proceeds from short-term borrowings, net

   (104,200  (182,389  286,589 

Repayment of short-term borrowings, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(104,200

)

Debt issuance costs and arrangement fees

   (7,263  (215  (624

 

 

(12

)

 

 

(5,651

)

 

 

(7,263

)

Payment of dividends and anti-dilution payments

   (156  (408  (69,432
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

(35

)

 

 

(156

)

Net cash used in financing activities

   (149,654  (183,012  (33,467

 

 

(12

)

 

 

(5,686

)

 

 

(149,654

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

   219,804   37,205   (114,595

 

 

2,208

 

 

 

(221,964

)

 

 

219,804

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

   156,233   119,028   233,623 

 

 

154,073

 

 

 

376,037

 

 

 

156,233

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

  $376,037  $156,233  $119,028 

 

$

156,281

 

 

$

154,073

 

 

$

376,037

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.General Information

1. General Information

Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. provides contract drilling services to the energy industry around the globe with a fleet of 1715 offshore drilling rigs, consisting of four4 drillships and seven ultra-deepwater, four deepwater and twomid-water11 semisubmersible rigs. Two rigs, including 2 rigs that are currently cold stacked. Our current fleet excludes the semisubmersibleOcean Victoryandjack-upOcean Scepter, are reported as “Assets held for sale”Confidence, which we expect to complete the sale of in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and have been excluded from our current fleet. TheOcean Victory was sold in January 2018. the first quarter of 2020. See Note 8.

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in these Notes to “Diamond Offshore,” “we,” “us” or “our” mean Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries. We were incorporated in Delaware in 1989.

As of February 9, 2018,7, 2020, Loews Corporation, or Loews, owned approximately 53% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

Principles of Consolidation

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany transactions and balances.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S., or GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Changes in Accounting Principles

Leases. In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), or ASU 2016-02, which (i) requires lessees to recognize a right of use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for most leases, (ii) updates previous accounting standards for lessors to align certain requirements with the updates to lessee accounting standards and the revenue recognition accounting standards and (iii) requires enhanced disclosure of qualitative and quantitative information about an entity's leasing arrangements.

We adopted ASU 2016-02 effective January 1, 2019 using an optional transition method requiring leases existing at, or entered into after, January 1, 2019 to be recognized and measured under the new accounting standard. Prior period amounts have not been adjusted and continue to be reflected in accordance with our historical accounting for leases. In our adoption of ASU 2016-02, we also utilized a transition practical expedient package whereby we did not reassess (i) whether any of our expired or existing contracts contain a lease, (ii) the classification for any expired or existing leases and (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases. The adoption of this standard resulted in the recording of operating lease assets and offsetting operating lease liabilities of $146.8 million as of January 1, 2019, with no related impact on our annual Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity. See Note 11.

Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, we concluded that our drilling contracts contain a lease component for the use of our drilling rigs based on the updated definition of a lease. However, ASU 2016-02 provides for a practical expedient for lessors whereby, under certain circumstances, the lessor may combine the lease and non-lease components and account for the combined component in accordance with the accounting treatment for the


predominant component. We have determined that our current drilling contracts qualify for this practical expedient and have combined the lease and service components of our standard drilling contracts. We continue to account for the combined component under ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and its related amendments.

Revenue Recognition. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), or ASU 2014-09, which superseded the revenue recognition requirements in ASU Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. Under the new guidance, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services and in an amount that reflects the consideration the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.

We adopted ASU 2014-09 and its related amendments, or collectively Topic 606, effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective implementation method. Accordingly, we have applied the five-step method outlined in Topic 606 for determining when and how revenue is recognized to all contracts that were not completed as of the date of adoption. Revenues for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts have not been adjusted and continue to be reported under the previous revenue recognition guidance. For contracts that were modified before the effective date, we have considered the modification guidance within the new standard and determined that the revenue recognized and contract balances recorded prior to adoption for such contracts were not impacted. While Topic 606 requires additional disclosure of the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, its adoption has not had a material impact on the measurement or recognition of our revenues.

Our adoption of ASU 2014-09 represents a change in accounting principle and therefore, we have recorded the cumulative effect of adopting Topic 606 as an increase to opening retained earnings on January 1, 2018. This adjustment represents an accrual for the earned portion of demobilization revenue expected to be received for contracts not completed as of December 31, 2017, which was not recordable under previous revenue recognition guidance until completion of the demobilization activities. See Note 2.

Income Taxes. In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, or ASU 2016-16. ASU 2016-16 amended the guidance in Topic 740 with respect to the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. We have evaluated our historical intra-group transactions for impact under the provisions of ASU 2016-16 and adopted the guidance thereof effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach. We recorded the $17.4 million cumulative effect of applying the new standard as a decrease to opening retained earnings with an offset to deferred income tax liability. See Note 14.

Stock-Based Compensation. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), or ASU 2016-09, which required (i) recognition of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as discrete tax items in the condensed consolidated statement of operations when share-based awards vest or are settled, (ii) exclusion of excess tax benefits from the computation of assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method when calculating earnings per share, and (iii) presentation of excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. The guidance also provides for a policy election to either estimate the number of awards expected to vest or account for forfeitures when they occur.  

We adopted ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017 using a modified retrospective approach and have elected to account for forfeitures of share-based awards in the period in which such forfeitures occur. The adoption resulted in a $0.6 million reduction in opening retained earnings and an offsetting increase in additional paid-in capital.  

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, or ASU 2016-13. ASU 2016-13 requires changes to the recognition of credit losses on financial instruments not accounted for at fair value through net income, including loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases and available-for-sale debt securities. The amended standard broadens the information that an entity must consider in developing its estimate of expected credit losses, requiring an entity to estimate credit losses over the life of an exposure based on historical information, current information and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The guidance is effective for interim and annual


periods beginning after December 15, 2019. We adopted ASU 2016-13 effective January 1, 2020 by applying a modified retrospective method and the impact was not material to our consolidated financial statements.  

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider short-term, highly liquid investments that have an original maturity of three months or less and deposits in money market mutual funds that are readily convertible into cash to be cash equivalents.

The effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in foreign currencies was not material for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015.2017.

Provision for Bad Debts

We recordPrior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, we have historically recorded a provision for bad debts on acase-by-case basis when facts and circumstances indicateindicated that a customer receivable may not be collectible. In establishing these reserves, we considerconsidered historical and other factors that predictpredicted collectability of such customer receivables, including write-offs, recoveries and the monitoring of credit quality. Such provision iswas reported as a component of “Operating expense” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 3.4.

Assets Held For Sale

We reported the $96.3 million and $0.4 million carrying values of certain of our rigs being marketed for sale as “Assets held for sale” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. TheOcean Victory, which was reported as “Assets held for sale” at December 31, 2017 with a carrying value of $1.2 million, was sold in January 2018. We also reported theOcean Scepter, ajack-up rig, as held for sale at December 31, 2017, based upon management’s

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

decision to sell the rig after receipt of an unsolicited bid for the rig in November 2017. The sale of the rig has not yet been negotiated; however, management is actively marketing the rig for sale and expects to complete a sale during 2018. TheOcean Spur, which was reported as “Assets held for sale” at December 31, 2016, was sold in 2017.

Drilling and Other Property and Equipment

We carry our drilling and other property and equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and routine repairs are charged to income currently while replacements and betterments that upgrade or increase the functionality of our existing equipment and that significantly extend the useful life of an existing asset are capitalized. Significant judgments, assumptions and estimates may be required in determining whether or not such replacements and betterments meet the criteria for capitalization and in determining useful lives and salvage values of such assets. Changes in these judgments, assumptions and estimates could produce results that differ from those reported. During the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, we capitalized $69.4$343.8 million and $177.6$243.6 million, respectively, in replacements and betterments of our drilling fleet.

Costs incurred for major rig upgrades and/or the construction of rigs are accumulated in constructionwork-in-progress, with no depreciation recorded on the additions, until the month the upgrade or newbuild is completed and the rig is placed in service. Upon retirement or sale of a rig, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any gains or losses are includedreported in our resultsConsolidated Statements of operationsOperations as “(Gain) loss“Loss (gain) on disposition of assets.” Depreciation is recognized up to applicable salvage values by applying the straight-line method over the remaining estimated useful lives from the year the asset is placed in service. Drilling rigs and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 30 years.

Capitalized Interest

We capitalize interest cost for rig construction or upgrades, as well asand other qualifying projects. During the three years ended December 31, 2017, we capitalized interest on qualifying expenditures, primarily related to our rig construction projects.

A reconciliation of our total interest cost to “Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized” as reported in our Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:follows (in thousands):

 

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2017   2016   2015 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

  (In thousands) 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Total interest cost including amortization of debt issuance costs

  $113,618   $110,748   $110,242 

 

$

122,832

 

 

$

123,816

 

 

$

113,618

 

Capitalized interest

   (90   (20,814   (16,308

 

 

 

 

 

(576

)

 

 

(90

)

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total interest expense as reported

  $113,528   $89,934   $93,934 

 

$

122,832

 

 

$

123,240

 

 

$

113,528

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate our property and equipment for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable (such as, but not limited to, cold stacking a rig, the expectation of cold stacking a rig in the near term, contracted backlog of less than one year for a rig, a decision to retire or scrap a rig, or excess spending over budget on a newbuild, construction project or major rig upgrade). We utilize an undiscounted

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

probability-weighted cash flow analysis in testing an asset for potential impairment. Our assumptions and estimates underlying this analysis include the following:

dayrate by rig;

utilization rate by rig if active, warm stacked or cold stacked (expressed as the actual percentage of time per year that the rig would be used at certain dayrates);

the per day operating cost for each rig if active, warm stacked or cold stacked;

the estimated annual cost for rig replacements and/or enhancement programs;

the estimated maintenance, inspection or other reactivation costs associated with a rig returning to work;

salvage value for each rig; and

estimated proceeds that may be received on disposition of each rig.

Based on these assumptions, we develop a matrix for each rig under evaluation using multiple utilization/dayrate scenarios, to each of which we have assigned a probability of occurrence. We arrive at a projected probability-weighted cash flow for each rig based on the respective matrix and compare such amount to the carrying value of the asset to assess recoverability.

The underlying assumptions and assigned probabilities of occurrence for utilization and dayrate scenarios are developed using a methodology that examines historical data for each rig, which considers the rig’s age, rated water depth and other attributes and then assesses its future marketability in light of the current and projected market environment at the time of assessment. Other assumptions, such as operating, maintenance, inspection and reactivation costs, are estimated using historical data adjusted for known developments, cost projections forre-entry of rigs into the market and future events that are anticipated by management at the time of the assessment.

Management’s assumptions are necessarily subjective and are an inherent part of our asset impairment evaluation, and the use of different assumptions could produce results that differ from those reported. Our methodology generally involves the use of significant unobservable inputs, representative of a Level 3 fair value measurement, which may include assumptions related to future dayrate revenue, costs and rig utilization, quotes from rig brokers, the long-term future performance of our rigs and future market conditions. Management’s assumptions involve uncertainties about future demand for our services, dayrates, expenses and other future events, and management’s expectations may not be indicative of future outcomes. Significant unanticipated changes to these assumptions could materially alter our analysis in testing an asset for potential impairment. For example, changes in market conditions that exist at the measurement date or that are projected by management could affect our key assumptions. Other events or circumstances that could affect our assumptions may include, but are not limited to, a further sustained decline in oil and gas prices, cancelations of our drilling contracts or contracts of our competitors, contract modifications, costs to comply with new governmental regulations, capital expenditures required due to advances in offshore drilling technology, growth in the global oversupply of oil and geopolitical events, such as lifting sanctions onoil-producing nations. Should actual market conditions in the future vary significantly from market conditions used in our projections, our assessment of impairment would likely be different. See Note 2.

3.

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We believe that the carrying amount of our current financial instruments approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. See Note 7.


Debt Issuance Costs

Deferred costs associated with our credit facilities are presented in “Other assets” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2019 and 2018 and amortized as interest expense over the respective terms of the credit facilities. During 2018, we paid $5.7 million in debt issuance and arrangement fees in connection with our credit facilities. Deferred costs associated with our senior notes are presented in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 as a reduction into the related long-term debt and are amortized over the respective terms of the related debt. See Note 9.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with accounting standards that require the recognition of the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and an asset and liability approach in recognizing the amount of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been currently recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. In each of our tax jurisdictions we recognize a current tax liability or asset for the estimated taxes payable or refundable on tax returns for the current year and a deferred tax asset or liability for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance, if necessary, which is determined by the amount of any tax benefits that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized under a “more likely than not” approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. We make judgments regarding future events and related estimates especially as they pertain to the forecasting of our effective tax rate, the potential realization of deferred tax assets such as utilization of foreign tax credits, and exposure to the disallowance of items deducted on tax returns upon audit.

We record both interest and penalties related to accrued unrecognized tax positions in “Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized” and recognize penalties associated with uncertain tax positions in “Income tax benefit” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Liabilities for uncertain tax positions, including any penalty,interest and penalties, are denominated in the currency of the related tax jurisdiction and are revalued for changes in currency exchange rates. The revaluation of such liabilities for uncertain tax positions is reported in “Income tax benefit” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 15.

Treasury Stock

In connection with the vesting of restricted stock units held by certain individuals, we acquired 29,416 and 7,923 shares of our common stock during 2017 and 2016, respectively (valued at $0.5 million in 2017 and $0.2 million in 2016), in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations that were incurred on the vesting date. See Note 4.

Depending on market conditions, we may, from time to time, purchase shares of our common stock in the open market or otherwise. We account for the purchase of treasury stock using the cost method, which reports the cost of the shares acquired in “Treasury stock” as a deduction from stockholders’ equity in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We did not repurchase any shares of our outstanding common stock during 2017, 2016 or 2015.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)14.

Comprehensive (Loss) Income

Comprehensive (loss) income (loss) is the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances except those transactions resulting from investments by owners and distributions to

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

owners. Comprehensive (loss) income (loss) for the three years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 includes net (loss) income (loss) and unrealized holding gains and losses on marketable securities and financial derivatives designated as cash flow accounting hedges. See Note 10.

Foreign Currency

Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Transactions incurred in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are subject to gains or losses due to fluctuations in those currencies. We report foreign currency transaction gains and losses as “Foreign currency transaction (loss) gain” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and may also include, when applicable, unrealized gains and losses to record the carrying value of foreign currency forward exchange, or FOREX, contracts not designated as accounting hedges and realized gains and losses from the settlement of such contracts.Operations. The revaluation of assets and liabilities related to foreign income taxes, including deferred tax assets and liabilities and uncertain tax positions, including any penalty,interest and/or penalties, is reported in “Income tax benefit (expense)”benefit” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.


2. Revenue Recognitionfrom Contracts with Customers

The activities that primarily drive the revenue earned from our contract drilling services includes (i) providing a drilling rig and the crew and supplies necessary to operate the rig, (ii) mobilizing and demobilizing the rig to and from the drill site and (iii) performing rig preparation activities and/or modifications required for the contract. Consideration received for performing these activities may consist of dayrate drilling revenue, mobilization and demobilization revenue, contract preparation revenue and reimbursement revenue. We recognize revenue from dayrateaccount for these integrated services provided within our drilling contracts as servicesa single performance obligation satisfied over time and comprised of a series of distinct time increments in which we provide drilling services.

Consideration for activities that are performed. In connection with such drillingnot distinct within the context of our contracts we may receive fees (on eitherand do not correspond to alump-sum or dayrate basis) for distinct time increment within the mobilization of equipment. We earn these fees as servicescontract term are performedallocated across the single performance obligation and recognized ratably over the initial term of the related drilling contracts. We defer mobilization fees received, as well as direct and incremental mobilization costs incurred, and amortize each, on a straight-line basis, over the term of the related drilling contractscontract (which is the period we estimate to be benefited from the mobilization activity)corresponding activities and generally ranges from two to 60 months). Straight-line amortization of mobilization revenuesConsideration for activities that correspond to a distinct time increment within the contract term is recognized in the period when the services are performed. The total transaction price is determined for each individual contract by estimating both fixed and related costsvariable consideration expected to be earned over the term of the contract. See below for further discussion regarding the allocation of the transaction price to the remaining performance obligations.

The amount estimated for variable consideration may be constrained (reduced) and is only included in the transaction price to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of previously recognized revenue will not occur throughout the term of the contract. When determining if variable consideration should be constrained, management considers whether there are factors outside of our control that could result in a significant reversal of revenue as well as the likelihood and magnitude of a potential reversal of revenue. These estimates are re-assessed each reporting period as required.

Dayrate Drilling Revenue. Our drilling contracts generally provide for payment on a dayrate basis, with higher rates for periods when the drilling unit is operating and lower rates or zero rates for periods when drilling operations are interrupted or restricted. The dayrate invoices billed to the customer are typically determined based on the varying rates applicable to the specific activities performed on an hourly basis. Such dayrate consideration is allocated to the distinct hourly increment it relates to within the contract term, and therefore, recognized in line with the contractual rate billed for the services provided for any given hour.

Mobilization/Demobilization Revenue. We may receive fees (on either a fixed lump-sum or variable dayrate basis) for the mobilization and demobilization of our rigs. These activities are not considered to be distinct within the context of the contract and therefore, the associated revenue is allocated to the overall performance obligation and recognized ratably over the initial term of the related drilling contract. We record a contract liability for mobilization fees received, which is amortized ratably to contract drilling revenue as services are rendered over the initial term of the related drilling contract. Demobilization revenue expected to be received upon contract completion is estimated as part of the overall transaction price at contract inception and recognized in earnings ratably over the initial term of the contract with an offset to an accretive contract asset.

In some contracts, (which generally range from twothere is uncertainty as to 60 months)the likelihood and amount of expected demobilization revenue to be received. For example, contractual provisions may require that a rig demobilize a certain distance before the demobilization revenue is consistent withpayable or the timing of net cash flows generatedamount may vary dependent upon whether or not the rig has additional contracted work within a certain distance from the actual drilling services performed. Absent a contract, mobilization costs are recognized currently. Upon completionwellsite. Therefore, the estimate for such revenue may be constrained, as described above, depending on the facts and circumstances pertaining to the specific contract. We assess the likelihood of a drilling contract, we recognize in earnings any demobilization fees receivedreceiving such revenue based on our past experience and costs incurred.knowledge of market conditions.

Contract Preparation Revenue. Some of our drilling contracts require downtime before the start of the contract to prepare the rig to meet customer requirements. At times, we may be compensated by the customer for such work (on either a fixed lump-sum or variable dayrate basis). These activities are not considered to be distinct within the context of the contract. We record a contract liability for contract preparation fees are generally earned as services are performedreceived, which is amortized ratably to contract drilling revenue over the initial term of the related drilling contracts. We defer contract preparation fees received, as well as direct and incremental costs associated with the contract preparation activities and amortize each, on a straight-line basis, over the term of the related drilling contracts (which we estimate to be benefited from the contract preparation activity)contract.


Capital Modification Revenue.

From time to time, we may receive fees from our customers for capital improvements or upgrades to our rigs to meet contractual requirements (on either a fixed lump-sum or variable dayrate basis). The activities related to these capital modifications are not considered to be distinct within the context of our contracts. We deferrecord a contract liability for such fees received in “Accrued liabilities” and “Other liabilities” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and recognize these fees into income on a straight-line basisthem ratably as contract drilling revenue over the periodinitial term of the related drilling contract.

Revenues Related to Reimbursable Expenses. We capitalize the costs of such capital improvements and depreciate them over the estimated useful life of the improvement.

We recordgenerally receive reimbursements receivedfrom our customers for the purchase of supplies, equipment, personnel services and other services provided at thetheir request of our customers in accordance with a drilling contract or agreement, forother agreement. Such reimbursable revenue is variable and subject to uncertainty, as the amounts received and timing thereof are highly dependent on factors outside of our influence. Accordingly, reimbursable revenue is fully constrained and not included in the total transaction price until the uncertainty is resolved, which typically occurs when the related costs are incurred on behalf of a customer. We are generally considered a principal in such transactions and record the associated revenue at the gross amount billed to the customer, as “Revenues related to reimbursable expenses” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2016, Such amounts are recognized ratably over the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU,No. 2016-16,Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, or ASU2016-16. ASU2016-16 amendsperiod within the guidance in Topic 740 with respect tocontract term during which the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. This guidance is effective for interimcorresponding goods and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We have evaluated our historical intra-group transactions for possible impact under the provisions of ASU2016-16. The guidance in ASU2016-16 will be applied effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach whereby we will record the cumulative effect of applying the new standard as an adjustment to opening retained earnings with an offset to a deferred income tax liability. We expect to reduce opening retained earnings by approximately $18 million upon adoption of the standard on January 1, 2018.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-15,Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, or ASU2016-15. ASU2016-15 provides specific guidance on eight cash flow classification issues not specifically addressed by GAAP: debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; settlement ofzero-coupon debt instruments; contingent consideration payments; proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies; distributions from equity method investees; beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. The amendments in ASU2016-15 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. ASU2016-15 should be applied using a retrospective transition method, unless it is impracticable to do so for some of the issues. In such case, the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. We do not expect ASU2016-15 to have a significant impact on the presentation of cash receipts and cash payments within our consolidated statements of cash flows.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-02,Leases (Topic 842), or ASU2016-02, which requires an entity to separate the lease components from thenon-lease components in a contract. The lease componentsservices are to be accounted for under ASU2016-02, which, underconsumed.

Contract Balances

Accounts receivable are recognized when the guidance, may require recognitionright to consideration becomes unconditional based upon contractual billing schedules. Payment terms on invoiced amounts are typically 30 days. Contract asset balances consist primarily of lease assetsdemobilization revenue that we expect to receive and lease liabilities by lessees for most leases and derecognitionis recognized ratably throughout the contract term, but invoiced upon completion of the leased asset and recognition of a net investment indemobilization activities. Once the lease by the lessor. ASU2016-02 also provides for additional disclosure requirements for both lessees and lessors.Non-lease components would be accounted for under ASU2014-09. We have determined that under the new standard, our drilling contracts contain a lease component and therefore we will be required to separately recognize revenues associated with the lease and services components. Additionally, for transactions in which we are considered lessees, we will recognize a lease liability and right of use asset based on our portfolio of leases as of the time of adoption. The guidance of ASU2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption of ASU2016-02 is permitted. We expect to adopt ASU2016-02 on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach. We are currently reviewing the requirements of the accounting standard with regard to arrangements under which we are either the lessor or lessee, to determine the impact of ASU2016-02, including any newly issued guidance, on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and disclosures contained in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), or ASU2014-09, which is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The new standard supersedes the industry-specific standards that currently exist under GAAP and provides a framework to address revenue recognition issues comprehensively for all contracts with customers regardless of industry-specific or transaction-specific fact patterns. Under the new guidance, companies recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU2014-09 provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and howdemobilization revenue is invoiced, the corresponding contract asset is transferred to accounts receivable. Contract assets may also include amounts recognized and requires enhanced disclosures about revenue. When applyingin advance of amounts invoiced due to the new standard, we plan to account for the integrated services provided within our drilling contracts asblending of rates when a single performance obligation composed of a series of distinct time increments, which will be satisfied over time. We will determine the total transaction price for each individual contract by estimating both fixed and variable consideration expected to be earnedhas operating dayrates that increase over the term ofinitial contract term. Contract liabilities include payments received for mobilization as well as rig preparation and upgrade activities which are allocated to the contract. Consideration that does not relate to a distinct good or service, such as mobilization, demobilization, and contract preparation revenue, will be allocated across the singleoverall performance obligation and recognized ratably over the initial term of the contract. All other componentsContract liabilities may also include amounts invoiced in advance of consideration withinamounts recognized due to the blending of rates when a contract includinghas operating dayrates that decrease over the dayrateinitial contract term.

Contract balances are netted at a contract level, such that deferred revenue for mobilization, contract preparation and capital modifications (contract liabilities) is netted with any accrued demobilization revenue (contract asset) for each applicable contract.

The following table provides information about receivables, contract assets and contract liabilities from our contracts with customers (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

2019

 

 

December 31,

2018

 

Trade receivables

 

$

199,572

 

 

$

160,478

 

Current contract assets (1)

 

 

6,314

 

 

 

6,832

 

Noncurrent contract assets (1)

 

 

 

 

 

2,107

 

Current contract liabilities (deferred revenue) (1)

 

 

(9,573

)

 

 

(2,803

)

Noncurrent contract liabilities (deferred revenue) (1)

 

 

(38,531

)

 

 

(17,723

)

(1)

Contract assets and contract liabilities may reflect balances that have been netted together on a contract basis. Net current contract asset and liability balances are included in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and “Accrued liabilities,” respectively, and net noncurrent contract asset and liability balances are included in “Other assets” and “Other liabilities,” respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.


Significant changes in the contract assets and the contract liabilities balances during the period are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Net Contract Balances

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Contract assets, beginning of period

 

$

8,939

 

 

$

2,718

 

Contract liabilities, beginning of period

 

 

(20,526

)

 

 

(20,343

)

Net balance at beginning of period

 

 

(11,587

)

 

 

(17,625

)

Decrease due to amortization of revenue that was

   included in the beginning contract liability

   balance

 

 

6,952

 

 

 

19,026

 

Increase due to cash received, excluding amounts

   recognized as revenue during the period

 

 

(34,529

)

 

 

(19,353

)

Increase due to revenue recognized during the

   period but contingent on future performance

 

 

3,537

 

 

 

7,114

 

Decrease due to transfer to receivables during the

   period

 

 

(5,119

)

 

 

(893

)

Adjustments

 

 

(1,044

)

 

 

144

 

Net balance at end of period

 

$

(41,790

)

 

$

(11,587

)

Contract assets at end of period

 

$

6,314

 

 

$

8,939

 

Contract liabilities at end of period

 

 

(48,104

)

 

 

(20,526

)

Deferred Contract Costs

Certain direct and incremental costs incurred for upfront preparation, initial mobilization and modifications of contracted rigs represent costs of fulfilling a contract as they relate directly to a contract, enhance resources that will continuebe used in satisfying our performance obligations in the future and are expected to be recovered. Such costs are deferred and amortized ratably to contract drilling expense as services are rendered over the initial term of the related drilling contract. Such deferred contract costs in the amount of $20.0 million and $4.0 million are reported in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and “Other assets,” respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2019. Deferred contract costs in the amount of $70.0 million and $13.1 million are reported in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and “Other assets,” respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2018. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the amount of amortization of such costs was $96.0 million and $67.7 million, respectively. There was 0 impairment loss in relation to capitalized costs.

Costs incurred for the demobilization of rigs at contract completion are recognized as incurred during the demobilization process. Costs incurred for rig modifications or upgrades required for a contract, which are considered to be capital improvements, are capitalized as drilling and other property and equipment and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the improvement.

Transaction Price Allocated to Remaining Performance Obligations

The following table reflects revenue expected to be recognized in the period when the services are performed. We expect our revenue recognition under ASU2014-09future related to differ from our current revenue recognition pattern only as it relates to demobilization revenue. Such revenue, which is recognized upon completion of a contract under current GAAP, will be estimated at contract inception and recognized over the term of the contract under the new guidance. We plan to adopt ASU2014-09 effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach whereby we will record the cumulative effect of applying the new standard to all outstanding contractsunsatisfied performance obligations as of January 1, 2018 as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. We do not expect this adjustment to be significant as it will primarily consistDecember 31, 2019 (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ending December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

Total

 

Mobilization and contract

   preparation revenue

 

$

2,268

 

 

$

630

 

 

$

124

 

 

$

3,022

 

Capital modification

   revenue

 

 

9,028

 

 

 

1,777

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,805

 

Blended rate revenue

 

 

27,848

 

 

 

9,114

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,962

 

Total

 

$

39,144

 

 

$

11,521

 

 

$

124

 

 

$

50,789

 


The revenue included above consists of the impact of the timing difference related to recognition of demobilizationexpected fixed mobilization and upgrade revenue for affected contracts. Not all contracts include a demobilization provision.

2.Asset Impairments

2017 Impairments. During 2017, in response to continued depressed market conditions for the offshore contract drilling industry, our expectations that a market recovery is not likely to occur in the near term,both wholly and partially unsatisfied performance obligations as well as decisions byexpected variable mobilization and upgrade revenue for partially unsatisfied performance obligations, which has been estimated for purposes of allocating across the entire corresponding performance obligations. Revenue expected to be recognized in the future related to the blending of rates when a contract has operating dayrates that decrease over the initial contract term is also included. The amounts are derived from the specific terms within drilling contracts that contain such provisions, and the expected timing for recognition of such revenue is based on the estimated start date and duration of each respective contract based on information known at December 31, 2019. The actual timing of recognition of such amounts may vary due to factors outside of our managementcontrol. We have applied the disclosure practical expedient in Topic 606 and have not included estimated variable consideration related to market certain rigs for sale,wholly unsatisfied performance obligations or to distinct future time increments within our contracts, including dayrate revenue.  

3. Asset Impairments

2019 Impairment Evaluation. At December 31, 2019, we evaluated ten3 drilling rigs with indicators of impairment. Based on our assumptions and analysis at that time, we determined that the undiscounted probability-weighted cash flow of each of these rigs was in excess of its carrying value. As a result, we concluded that 0 impairment of these rigs had occurred at December 31, 2019.

2018 Impairment. During 2018, we recorded an impairment loss of $27.2 million to recognize a reduction in fair value of the Ocean Scepter. We estimated the fair value of the impaired rig using a market approach based on a signed agreement to sell the rig, less estimated costs to sell. We considered this valuation approach to be a Level 3 fair value measurement due to the level of estimation involved as the sale had not yet been completed at the time of our analysis.

2017 Impairments. During 2017, we evaluated 10 of our drilling rigs with indications that their carrying values may not be recoverable. Based on our analyses, weindicators of impairment and determined that the carrying values of three3 rigs were impaired including one rig that had previously been impaired in a prior year and two rigs that were classified as held for sale at December 31, 2017. We(we collectively refer to these three rigs as the “2017 Impaired Rigs.” The 2017 Impaired Rigs consist of one ultra-deepwater semisubmersible, one deepwater semisubmersible and onejack-up rig.Rigs).

We estimated the fair value of two2 of the 2017 Impaired Rigs using an income approach, in whichwhereby the fair value of each rig was estimated based on a calculation of the rig’s discounted future net cash flows over its remaining economic life, whichflows. These calculations utilized significant unobservable inputs, including but not limited to, assumptions related to estimated dayrate revenue, rig utilization, estimated reactivation and regulatory survey costs, as well as estimated proceeds that may be received on ultimate disposition of theeach rig. The fair value of the otherremaining 2017 Impaired Rig was estimated using a market approach, which required us to estimate the value that would be received for the rig in the principal or most advantageous market for that rig in an orderly transaction between market participants. This estimate was primarily based on an indicative bid to purchase the rig at that time, as well as our evaluation of other market data points; however, the rig has not been sold.points. Our fair value estimates were representative of Level 3 fair value measurements due to the significant level of estimation involved and the lack of transparency as to the inputs used. During the second and fourth quarters of 2017, we

We recorded impairment losses of $71.3 million and $28.0 million, respectively, or an aggregate impairment losslosses of $99.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 related to our 2017 Impaired Rigs.

2016 Impairments. During 2016, we evaluated 15 of our drilling rigs with indications that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Based on our assumptions and analyses at that time, we determined that the carrying values of eight of these rigs were impaired, including one rig that had been previously impaired in a prior year. We collectively refer to

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)See Note 1.

 


these eight rigs as the “2016 Impaired Rigs.” The 2016 Impaired Rigs consisted of three ultra-deepwater, three deepwater and twomid-water semisubmersible rigs.4. Supplemental Financial Information

We estimated the fair value of the 2016 Impaired Rigs using an income approach, as described above. Our fair value estimates were representative of Level 3 fair value measurements due to the significant level of estimation involved and the lack of transparency as to the inputs used. During the second quarter of 2016, we recorded an impairment loss of $670.0 million related to our 2016 Impaired Rigs.

2015 Impairments. During 2015, we evaluated 25 of our drilling rigs with indications that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Using an undiscounted, projected probability-weighted cash flow analysis, we determined that the carrying value of 17 of these rigs, consisting of two ultra-deepwater, one deepwater and ninemid-water floaters and fivejack-up rigs, were impaired. We collectively refer to these 17 rigs as the “2015 Impaired Rigs.”

We estimated the fair value of 16 of the 2015 Impaired Rigs utilizing a market approach, as described above. We estimated the fair value of the one remaining 2015 Impaired Rig using an income approach, as discussed above. Our fair value estimates are representative of Level 3 fair value measurements due to the significant level of estimation involved and the lack of transparency as to the inputs used. During the first, third and fourth quarters of 2015, we recognized impairment losses of $358.5 million, $2.6 million and $499.4 million, respectively, for an aggregate impairment loss of $860.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.

See Notes 1 and 8.

3.Supplemental Financial Information

Consolidated Balance SheetSheets Information

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for bad debts, consists of the following:following (in thousands):

 

  December 31, 
  2017   2016 

 

December 31,

 

  (In thousands) 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Trade receivables

  $247,453   $236,040 

 

$

199,572

 

 

$

160,478

 

Federal income tax receivable

 

 

38,574

 

 

 

 

Value added tax receivables

   14,067    14,639 

 

 

17,716

 

 

 

13,237

 

Related party receivables

   205    149 

 

 

166

 

 

 

174

 

Other

   464    1,659 

 

 

287

 

 

 

190

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

256,315

 

 

 

174,079

 

   262,189    252,487 

Allowance for bad debts

   (5,459   (5,459

 

 

(5,459

)

 

 

(5,459

)

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $256,730   $247,028 

 

$

250,856

 

 

$

168,620

 

  

 

   

 

 

An analysis of the changes

There was no change in our provision for bad debts for each of the three years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015 is as follows:

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2017   2016   2015 
   (In thousands) 

Allowance for bad debts, beginning of year

  $5,459   $5,724   $5,724 

Bad debt recovery

       (265    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Allowance for bad debts, end of year

  $5,459   $5,459   $5,724 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

2017. See Note 7 for a discussion of our provision for bad debts and write off ofpolicy regarding uncollectible accounts against the reserve.accounts.

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:following (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

 

  December 31, 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

  2017   2016 
  (In thousands) 

Deferred contract costs

 

$

20,019

 

 

$

70,021

 

Rig spare parts and supplies

  $28,383   $25,343 

 

 

18,250

 

 

 

20,256

 

Deferred mobilization costs

   51,297    61,488 

Prepaid BOP Lease

   3,873    3,873 

Prepaid taxes

 

 

12,475

 

 

 

54,412

 

Current contract assets

 

 

6,314

 

 

 

6,832

 

Prepaid rig costs

 

 

2,990

 

 

 

5,247

 

Prepaid insurance

   3,091    3,771 

 

 

2,892

 

 

 

2,742

 

Prepaid taxes

   67,212    2,894 

Prepaid software costs

 

 

2,319

 

 

 

1,531

 

Other

   3,769    4,777 

 

 

3,399

 

 

 

2,355

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $157,625   $102,146 

 

$

68,658

 

 

$

163,396

 

  

 

   

 

 

During 2016, we recognized an $8.1 million impairment loss related to our rig spare parts and supplies.

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:following (in thousands):

 

   December 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (In thousands) 

Rig operating expenses

  $48,894   $33,732 

Payroll and benefits

   46,560    45,619 

Deferred revenue

   11,371    9,522 

Accrued capital project/upgrade costs

   3,698    60,308 

Interest payable

   28,234    18,365 

Personal injury and other claims

   5,699    6,424 

Other

   10,199    8,189 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $154,655   $182,159 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

“Accrued liabilities” at December 31, 2017, includes $13.6 million in accrued costs related to our 2017 Reduction Plan of which $11.5 million and $2.1 million were reported as “Rig operating expenses” and “Payroll and benefits,” respectively. See Note 14.

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Accrued capital project/upgrade costs

 

$

56,603

 

 

$

37,379

 

Payroll and benefits

 

 

42,494

 

 

 

47,564

 

Rig operating expenses

 

 

37,969

 

 

 

42,323

 

Interest payable

 

 

28,234

 

 

 

28,234

 

Current operating lease liability (1)

 

 

20,030

 

 

 

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

9,573

 

 

 

2,803

 

Personal injury and other claims

 

 

7,074

 

 

 

5,544

 

Shorebase and administrative costs

 

 

5,275

 

 

 

6,217

 

Other

 

 

3,528

 

 

 

2,164

 

Total

 

$

210,780

 

 

$

172,228

 

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

(1)

We adopted ASU 2016-02 effective January 1, 2019, which required us to recognize a right of use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for most leases. See Note 11.


Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows Information

Noncash investing activities excluded from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and other supplemental cash flow information is as follows:follows (in thousands):

 

  December 31, 
  2017   2016   2015 

 

December 31,

 

  (In thousands) 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Accrued but unpaid capital expenditures at period end

  $3,698   $60,308   $84,146 

 

$

56,603

 

 

$

37,234

 

 

$

3,698

 

Common stock withheld for payroll tax obligations(1)

   483    181    236 

 

 

1,398

 

 

 

1,301

 

 

 

483

 

Cash interest payments(2)

   97,096    105,987    110,412 

Cash interest payments

 

 

113,063

 

 

 

113,063

 

 

 

97,096

 

Cash income taxes paid (refunded), net:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign

 

 

17,821

 

 

 

9,286

 

 

 

43,999

 

U.S. federal

       (31,151   (21,751

 

 

1,001

 

 

 

(7,389

)

 

 

 

Foreign

   43,999    48,931    69,697 

State

   94    1    58 

 

 

(15

)

 

 

2

 

 

 

94

 

 

(1)

Represents the cost of 29,416132,547, 87,799 and 7,92329,416 shares of common stock withheld to satisfy the payroll tax obligation incurred as a result of the vesting of restricted stock units in 20172019, 2018 and 2016,2017, respectively. These costs are presented as a deduction from stockholders’ equity in “Treasury stock” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and 2016.respectively.

(2)Interest payments, net of amounts capitalized, were $97.0 million, $86.1 million and $94.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

4.Stock-Based Compensation

5. Stock-Based Compensation

We have an Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, or Equity Plan, for our officers, independent contractors, employees andnon-employee directors, which is designed to encourage stock ownership by such persons, thereby aligning their interests with those of our stockholders and to permit the payment of performance-based compensation as defined by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code.persons. Under the Equity Plan, we may grant both time-vesting and performance-vesting awards, which are earned on the achievement of certain performance criteria. The following types of awards may be granted under the Equity Plan:

Stock options (including incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options);

Stock appreciation rights, or SARs;

Restricted stock;

Restricted stock units, or RSUs;

Performance shares or units; and

Other stock-based awards (including dividend equivalents).

A maximum of 7,500,000 shares of our common stock is available for the grant or settlement of awards under the Equity Plan, subject to adjustment for certain business transactions and changes in capital structure. Vesting conditions and other terms and conditions of awards under the Equity Plan are determined by our Board of Directors or the

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

compensation committee of our Board of Directors, subject to the terms of the Equity Plan. RSUs may be issued with performance-vesting or time-vesting features. Except for RSUs issued to our CEO,Chief Executive Officer, RSUs are not participating securities, and the holders of such awards have no right to receive regular dividends if or when declared. However, we have not paid a dividend to stockholders since 2015.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-09,Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718), or ASU2016-09. ASU2016-09 requires that all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies be recognized in the income statement as discrete tax items when share-based awards vest or are settled. The update also clarifies the statement of cash flows presentation for certain components of share-based awards and provides for a policy election to either estimate the number of awards expected to vest or account for forfeitures when they occur. We have elected to account for forfeitures of share-based awards in the period in which such forfeitures occur and adopted ASU2016-09 on January 1, 2017 using a modified retrospective approach. The adoption of ASU2016-09 resulted in a $0.6 million reduction in opening retained earnings. The impact to our Consolidated Balance Sheets is as follows:

   Retained
Earnings
   Additional
Paid-in Capital
 
   (In thousands) 

Balance as of January 1, 2017 before adoption

  $1,946,765   $2,004,514 

Adjustment for making election to account for forfeitures as they occur

   (634   634 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of January 1, 2017 after adoption

  $1,946,131   $2,005,148 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

All other requirements of ASU2016-09, where applicable, have been applied prospectively as of January 1,2017.

Total compensation cost recognized for all awards under the Equity Plan (or its predecessor) for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016 and 2015 was $8.7$6.2 million, $7.0$6.8 million and $5.7$8.7 million, respectively. Tax benefits recognized for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 related thereto were $2.6$0.5 million, $2.4$0.8 million and $1.9$2.6 million, respectively. As of December 31, 20172019 there was $11.2$6.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related tonon-vested awards under the Equity Plan, which we expect to recognize over a weighted average period of two years.


Time-Vesting Awards

SARs. Currently, SARs awarded under the Equity Plan generally vest ratably over a four-year periodimmediately and expire in ten years. The exercise price per share of SARs awarded under the Equity Plan may not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.

The fair value of SARs granted under the Equity Plan (or its predecessor) during each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 was estimated using the Black Scholes pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2017  2016  2015 

Expected life of SARs (in years)

   7   7   6 

Expected volatility

   31.70  45.79  55.12

Dividend yield

      .60%(1)   1.70

Risk free interest rate

   2.09  1.46  1.66

(1)Represents dividend yield related to January 2016 grant of SARs prior to our decision in early 2016 to discontinue paying dividends.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Expected life of SARs (in years)

 

 

7

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

7

 

Expected volatility

 

 

39.35

%

 

 

32.10

%

 

 

31.70

%

Risk free interest rate

 

 

2.11

%

 

 

2.56

%

 

 

2.09

%

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The expected life of SARs is based on historical data as is the expected volatility. The dividend yield is based on the current approved regular dividend rate in effect and the current market price at the time of grant. Risk free interest rates are determined using the U.S. Treasury yield curve at time of grant with a term equal to the expected life of the SARs.

A summary of SARs activity under the Equity Plan as of December 31, 20172019 and changes during the year then ended is as follows:

 

   Number of
Awards
   Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

(Years)
   Aggregate Intrinsic
Value

(In Thousands)
 

Awards outstanding at January 1, 2017

   1,449,706   $67.43     

Granted

   66,000   $14.95     

Exercised

          

Forfeited

   5,240   $41.88     

Expired

   248,352   $90.95     
  

 

 

       

Awards outstanding at December 31, 2017

   1,262,114   $60.16    4.3   $272 
  

 

 

       

Awards exercisable at December 31, 2017

   1,230,382   $60.63    4.2   $272 
  

 

 

       

 

 

Number of

Awards

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price

 

 

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term

(Years)

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

(In

Thousands)

 

Awards outstanding at January 1, 2019

 

 

1,029,082

 

 

$

54.08

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

28,000

 

 

$

8.57

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expired

 

 

(134,852

)

 

$

71.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Awards outstanding at December 31, 2019

 

 

922,230

 

 

$

50.19

 

 

 

3.6

 

 

$

 

Awards exercisable at December 31, 2019

 

 

922,230

 

 

$

50.19

 

 

 

3.6

 

 

$

 

The weighted-average grant date fair values per share of awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016were $3.75, $7.11 and 2015 were $5.61, $9.32 and $14.44, respectively. The total intrinsic value of awards exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 was $0, $0$0.1 million and $0, respectively. The total fair value of awards vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016was $0.1 million, $0.7 million and 2015 was $1.2 million, $2.2 million and $3.6 million, respectively.

Restricted Stock Units. RSUs are contractual rights to receive shares of our common stock in the future if the applicable vesting conditions are met. In 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, we granted an aggregate of 276,085, 183,076310,700, 135,759 and 153,493276,085 time-vesting RSUs, respectively.One-half of each annual grant of time-vesting RSUs will vest two years from the date of grant and the remaining 50% of which will vest three years from the date of grant, conditioned upon continued employment through the applicable vesting date. The fair value of time-vesting RSUs granted under the Equity Plan was estimated based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The fair value ofnon-participating RSUs granted in 2015 was discounted at a three-year risk-free interest rate of 1.48%, in consideration of thenon-participative rights of the awards. The fair values ofnon-participating RSUs granted in 2017 and 2016 were not discounted as the fair values would have reflected the 2016 suspension of regular dividend payments.


A summary of activity for time-vesting RSUs under the Equity Plan as of December 31, 20172019 and changes during the year then ended is as follows:

 

 

Number

of Awards

 

 

Weighted

-Average

Grant Date

Fair Value

Per Share

 

  Number of
Awards
   Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 

Nonvested awards at January 1, 2017

   319,560   $23.13 

Nonvested awards at January 1, 2019

 

 

422,059

 

 

$

16.57

 

Granted

   276,085   $16.37 

 

 

310,700

 

 

$

10.47

 

Vested

   68,659   $25.08 

 

 

(174,774

)

 

$

18.20

 

Forfeited

   55,697   $20.76 

 

 

(24,382

)

 

$

13.42

 

  

 

   

Nonvested awards at December 31, 2017

   471,289   $19.15 
  

 

   

Nonvested awards at December 31, 2019

 

 

533,603

 

 

$

12.58

 

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The total fair value of time-vesting RSUs vested during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $1.1 million.

No time-vesting RSUs vested during the years ended December 31, 2016 or 2015.2019, 2018 and 2017 was $1.9 million, $1.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively.

Performance-Vesting Awards

Restricted Stock Units. In 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, we granted an aggregate of 370,616, 248,188190,634, 194,563 and 169,312370,616 performance-vesting RSUs, respectively, which will vest upon achievement of certain performance goals as set forth in the individual award agreements over the three-year performance period beginning on January 1 in the year of grant. The shares of our common stock to be received upon the vesting of the performance-vesting RSUs will be delivered no later than March 15 of the year following completion of the three-year performance period. The fair value of performance-vesting RSUs granted under the Equity Plan to employees in 2015, other than to our CEO, was estimated based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The fair value ofnon-participating, performance-vesting RSUs granted in 2015 was discounted at a three-year risk-free interest rate of 1.48% in consideration of thenon-participative rights of the awards. The fair value of performance-vesting RSUs granted to our CEO in 2015 was not discounted as such awards are participating securities. The fair values of performance-vesting RSUs granted in 2017 and 2016 were not discounted as the fair values would have reflected the 2016 suspension of regular dividend payments.

A summary of activity for performance-vesting RSUs under the Equity Plan as of December 31, 20172019 and changes during the year then ended is as follows:

 

   Number of
Awards
   Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share
 

Nonvested awards at January 1, 2017

   431,706   $24.55 

Granted

   370,616   $16.61 

Vested

   18,876   $46.64 

Forfeited

   55,590   $19.95 
  

 

 

   

Nonvested awards at December 31, 2017

   727,856   $20.28 
  

 

 

   

 

 

Number

of Awards

 

 

Weighted

-Average

Grant Date

Fair Value

Per Share

 

Nonvested awards at January 1, 2019

 

 

741,973

 

 

$

17.53

 

Granted

 

 

190,634

 

 

$

10.49

 

Vested

 

 

(223,330

)

 

$

21.44

 

Nonvested awards at December 31, 2019

 

 

709,277

 

 

$

14.41

 

The total grant date fair value of the performance-vesting RSUs that vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016was $2.3 million, $2.5 million and 2015 was $0.3 million, $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

6. (Loss) Earnings Per Share

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

5.Earnings (Loss) Per Share

A reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of theWe present basic and dilutedper-share computations follows: (loss) earnings per share on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Basic (loss) earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted (loss) earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock (common share equivalents) were exercised or converted into common stock, unless the effect would be antidilutive. For all periods in which we experience a net loss, all shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock appreciation rights and vesting of outstanding restricted stock units have been excluded from the calculation of weighted-average shares because their inclusion would be antidilutive.

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2017   2016   2015 
   (In thousands, except per share data) 

Net income (loss) — basic and diluted (numerator):

  $18,346   $(372,503  $(274,285
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares — basic (denominator):

   137,213    137,168    137,157 

Dilutive effect of stock-based awards

   52         
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares including conversions — diluted (denominator):

   137,265    137,168    137,157 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per share:

      

Basic

  $0.13   $(2.72  $(2.00
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

  $0.13   $(2.72  $(2.00

The following table sets forth the share effects of stock-based awards excludedexcluded from the computation of diluted (loss) earnings (loss) per share as the inclusion of such potentially dilutive shares would have been antidilutive for the periods presented.(in thousands).

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2017   2016   2015 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  (In thousands) 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Employee and director:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

       7    26 

SARs

   1,315    1,505    1,553 

 

 

982

 

 

 

1,133

 

 

 

1,315

 

RSUs

   757    704    278 

 

 

1,205

 

 

 

1,153

 

 

 

757

 

6. Derivative Financial Instruments

Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts

Our international operations expose us to foreign exchange risk associated with our costs payable in foreign currencies. To manage this risk, in prior years we entered into FOREX contracts for future delivery of Australian dollars, Brazilian reais, British pounds sterling, Mexican pesos and Norwegian kroner. These forward contracts were derivatives as defined by GAAP.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we settled FOREX contracts with aggregate a notional value of approximately $91.6 million of which the entire aggregate amount was designated as an accounting hedge. During the year ended December 31, 2015 we did not enter into or settle any FOREX contracts that were not designated as accounting hedges. We did not enter into any FOREX contracts during 2017 or 2016 and there were no FOREX contracts outstanding at December 31, 2017 or 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized an aggregate loss of $8.4 million related to our FOREX contracts designated as hedging instruments, which was reported in Contract drilling expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table presents the amounts recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets7. Financial Instruments and Consolidated Statements of Operations related to our derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges for the year ended December 31, 2015.Fair Value Disclosures

For the Year Ended
December 31,
2015
(In thousands)

FOREX contracts:

Amount of loss recognized in AOCGL on derivative (effective portion)

$(2,420)

Location of loss reclassified from AOCGL into income (effective portion)



Contract drilling,
excluding
depreciation


Amount of loss reclassified from AOCGL into income (effective portion)

$(7,829)

Location of loss recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing)



Foreign currency
transaction gain
(loss)


Amount of loss recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing)

$(1)

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we did not reclassify any amounts from AOCGL due to the probability of an underlying forecasted transaction not occurring.

7.Financial Instruments and Fair Value Disclosures

Concentrations of Credit and Market Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit or market risk consist primarily of periodic temporary investments of excess cash, trade accounts receivable and investments in debt securities, including mortgage-backed securities. We generally place our excess cash investments in U.S. government backedTreasury Bills and U.S. government-backed short-term money market instruments through several financial institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the insurable limit. We periodically evaluate the relative credit standing of these financial institutions as part of our investment strategy.

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to our trade accounts receivable are limited, primarily due to the entities comprising our customer base. Since the market for our services is the offshore oil and gas industry, this customer base consists primarily of major and independent oil and gas companies, andas well as government-owned oil companies. Based on our current customer base and the geographic areas in which we operate, as well as the number of rigs currently working in a geographic area, we do notWe believe that we have anypotentially significant concentrations of credit risk at December 31, 2017.on the basis of the limited number of our rigs currently contracted and the smaller population of customers, as several customers have contracted for multiple rigs.

In general, before working for a customer with whom we have not had a prior business relationship and/or whose financial stability may be uncertain to us, we perform a credit review on that company. Based on that analysis, we may require that the customer present a letter of credit, prepay or provide other credit enhancements. We recordHistorically, we have recorded a provision for bad debts on acase-by-case basis when facts and circumstances indicateindicated that a customer receivable may not be collectible and, historically, lossescollectible. Losses on our trade receivables have been infrequent occurrences.

In December 2013, we entered into a settlement with Niko with respect to certain obligations under dayrate contracts for theOcean Monarch andOcean Lexington, whereby we would receive an aggregate of $80.0 million. From December

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

2013 until Niko’s default on the agreement, we received $49.0 million from Niko. Commencing in 2015, we filed a lawsuit against Niko in a U.S. court and a Canadian court, both of which granted judgments against Niko. On October 18, 2016, we executed a final settlement agreement with Niko, or which we refer to as the 2016 Agreement. Under the 2016 Agreement, Niko paid us a cash settlement amount of $3.0 million, agreed to make future payments to us equal to 20% of amounts to be retained by Niko pursuant to a waterfall distribution under their credit facility and assigned to us Niko’s interest in potential contingent payments related to the sale of five Indonesian production sharing contracts. We plan to recognize revenue from these amounts as funds are received due to the uncertainty regarding their timing and collection. As of December 31, 2017, the amount outstanding to us under the agreement was $28.0 million.

Fair Values

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy prescribed by GAAP requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1

Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. Level 1 assets include short-term investments such as money market funds, U.S. Treasury Bills and Treasury notes. Our Level 1 assets at December 31, 2017 consisted of cash held in money market funds of $337.1 million and time deposits of $20.9 million. Our Level 1 assets at December 31, 2016 consisted of cash held in money market funds of $125.7 million and time deposits of $20.6 million.

Level 2

Quoted market prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. Level 2 assets and liabilities may include residential mortgage-backed securities, corporate bonds purchased in a private placement offering andover-the-counter foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Our Level 2 assets at December 31, 2016 consisted solely of residential mortgage-backed securities, which were valued using a model-derived valuation technique based on the quoted closing market prices received from a financial institution. The inputs used in our valuation are obtained from a Bloomberg curve analysis which uses par coupon swap rates to calculate implied forward rates so that projected floating rate cash flows can be calculated. The valuation techniques underlying the models are widely accepted in the financial services industry and do not involve significant judgment. We had no Level 2 assets or liabilities as of December 31, 2017.

Level 3

Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. Level 3 assets and liabilities generally include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation or for which there is a lack of transparency as to the inputs used. Our Level 3 assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 consisted of nonrecurring measurements of certain of our drilling rigs and associated spare parts and supplies for which we recorded an impairment loss during the second and fourth quarters of 2017 and the second quarter of 2016. See Notes 1, 2 and 3.

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 


Market conditions could cause an instrument to be reclassified among Levels 1, 2 and 3. Our policy regarding fair value measurements of financial instruments transferred into and out of levels is to reflect the transfers as having occurred at the beginning of the reporting period. There were no transfers between fair value levels during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Certain of our assets and liabilities are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with GAAP. In addition, certain assets and liabilities may be recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Generally, we record assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment charges. We recorded an impairment chargescharge related to certainone of our drilling rigs, and related spare parts and supplies, which werewas measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in 2017 and 2016, respectively,2018, and have presented the aggregate loss in “Impairment of assets” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.2018.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are summarized below.below (in thousands).

 

   December 31, 2017 
   Fair Value Measurements Using   Assets at Fair
Value
   Total Losses
for Year
Ended(1)
 
   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3     
   (In thousands) 

Recurring fair value measurements:

          

Assets:

          

Short-term investments

  $358,019   $   $   $358,019   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Nonrecurring fair value measurements:

          

Assets:

          

Impaired assets(2)

  $   $   $97,261   $97,261   $99,313 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Assets at

Fair Value

 

 

 

Recurring fair value measurements:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

$

135,300

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

135,300

 

 

 

Total short-term investments

 

$

135,300

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

135,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Assets at

Fair Value

 

 

Total

Losses

for Year

Ended (1)

 

Recurring fair value measurements:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury bills

 

$

299,900

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

299,900

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

 

135,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

135,800

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term investments

 

$

435,700

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

435,700

 

 

 

 

 

Nonrecurring fair value measurements:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impaired assets

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

27,225

 

(1)

Represents impairment lossesloss of $71.3 million and $28.0$27.2 million recognized during the second and fourth quarters of 2017, respectively,2018 related to our 2017 Impaired Rigs.a drilling rig whose carrying value was impaired and was subsequently sold. See Note 2.3.

(2)Represents the total book value as of December 31, 2017 of one ultra-deepwater rig and one deepwater semisubmersible rig, which were written down to their estimated fair value during the second quarter of 2017, and onejack-up rig, which was written down to fair value during the fourth quarter of 2017. Of the total fair value, $96.3 million and $1.0 million were reported as “Assets held for sale” and “Drilling and other property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation,” respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017. See Notes 1 and 2.

   December 31, 2016 
   Fair Value Measurements Using   Assets at Fair
Value
   Total Losses
for Year
Ended(1)
 
   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3     
   (In thousands) 

Recurring fair value measurements:

          

Assets:

          

Short-term investments

  $146,360   $   $   $146,360   

Mortgage-backed securities

       35        35   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total assets

  $146,360   $35   $   $146,395   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Nonrecurring fair value measurements:

          

Assets:

          

Impaired assets(2)

  $   $   $69,153   $69,153   $678,145 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(1)Represents impairment losses of $8.1 million and $670.0 million recognized during the year ended December 31, 2016 related to our rig spare parts and supplies and 2016 Impaired Rigs, respectively. See Notes 2 and 3.
(2)Represents the total book value as of December 31, 2016 for 11 drilling rigs ($45.5 million) and for rig spare parts and supplies ($23.6 million), which were previously written down to their estimated fair value. Of the total fair value, $23.6 million, $0.4 million and $45.1 million were reported as “Prepaid expenses and other current assets,” “Assets held for sale” and “Drilling and other property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation,” respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016. See Notes 1, 2 and 3.

We believe that the carrying amounts of our other financial assets and liabilities (excluding long-term debt), which are not measured at fair value in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, approximate fair value based on the following assumptions:

 

Cash and cash equivalents -- The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

 

Accounts receivable and accounts payable -- The carrying amounts approximate fair value based on the nature of the instruments.


Short-term borrowings — The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

We consider ourOur senior notes including current maturities, to be Level 2 liabilitiesare not measured at fair value; however, under the GAAP fair value hierarchy, and, accordingly, theour long-term debt would be considered Level 2 liabilities. The fair value of our senior notes was derived using a third-party pricing service at December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018. We perform control procedures over information we obtain from pricing services and brokers to test whether prices received represent a reasonable estimate of fair value. These procedures include the review of pricing service or broker pricing methodologies and comparing fair value estimates to actual trade activity executed in the market for these instruments occurring generally within a10-day window period of the report date. Fair values and related carrying values of our senior notes (see Note 9) are shown below.below (in millions).

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

  December 31, 2017   December 31, 2016 

 

Fair

Value

 

 

Carrying

Value

 

 

Fair

Value

 

 

Carrying

Value

 

  Fair Value   Carrying Value   Fair Value   Carrying Value 
  (In millions) 

5.875% Senior Notes due 2019

  $   $   $518.6   $499.8 

3.45% Senior Notes due 2023

   223.1    249.4    215.0    249.3 

 

$

212.5

 

 

$

249.6

 

 

$

185.0

 

 

$

249.5

 

7.875% Senior Notes due 2025

   523.1    496.5         

 

 

435.0

 

 

 

497.1

 

 

 

415.0

 

 

 

496.8

 

5.70% Senior Notes due 2039

   405.0    497.2    392.5    497.1 

 

 

292.5

 

 

 

497.3

 

 

 

305.0

 

 

 

497.2

 

4.875% Senior Notes due 2043

   547.5    748.9    532.7    748.9 

 

 

408.8

 

 

 

749.0

 

 

 

416.3

 

 

 

748.9

 

We have estimated the fair value amounts by using appropriate valuation methodologies and information available to management. Considerable judgment is required in developing these estimates, and accordingly, no assurance can be given that the estimated values are indicative of the amounts that would be realized in a free market exchange.

8. Drilling and Other Property and Equipment

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

8.Drilling and Other Property and Equipment

Cost and accumulated depreciation of drilling and other property and equipment are summarized as follows:follows (in thousands):

 

  December 31, 
  2017   2016 

 

December 31,

 

  (In thousands) 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Drilling rigs and equipment

  $7,971,406   $8,950,385 

 

$

8,004,489

 

 

$

8,210,824

 

Land and buildings

   63,309    64,449 

 

 

64,267

 

 

 

63,757

 

Office equipment and other

   82,691    73,108 

 

 

92,289

 

 

 

91,819

 

  

 

   

 

 

Cost

   8,177,406    9,087,942 

 

 

8,161,045

 

 

 

8,366,400

 

Less accumulated depreciation

   (2,855,765   (3,361,007
  

 

   

 

 

Less: accumulated depreciation

 

 

(3,008,217

)

 

 

(3,182,178

)

Drilling and other property and equipment, net

  $5,261,641   $5,726,935 

 

$

5,152,828

 

 

$

5,184,222

 

  

 

   

 

 

During 2019, we recognized an aggregate pre-tax loss of $1.1 million on the years endeddisposal of assets, which included a pre-tax gain on the sale of the Ocean Guardian of $14.3 million offset by an aggregate pre-tax loss of $15.4 million on the disposal of certain other property and equipment. In 2019, we also transferred the $1.0 million net book value of the Ocean Confidence, a previously impaired semisubmersible rig, to “Asset held for sale” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20172019. We expect to complete the sale of the rig in the first quarter of 2020 for a net gain of $3.5 million.

9. Credit Agreements and 2016,Senior Notes

Credit Agreements

In September 2012, we recognized impairment losses of $99.3 million and $670.0 million, respectively. See Note 2.

9.Credit Agreement and Senior Notes

Credit Agreement

We haveentered into a syndicated 5-year revolving credit agreement, with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,which, as administrative agent and swingline lender, that providesamended as of August 18, 2016, provided for a $1.5 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility for general corporate purposes,purposes. On October 2, 2018, we entered into Amendment No. 6 and Consent to Credit Agreement and Successor Agency Agreement, or the Amendment, which weamended our 5-year revolving credit agreement, dated as of September 28, 2012, as amended (we refer to such credit agreement as the Amended Credit Agreement. Our Credit Agreement maturesFacility). Among other things, the Amendment reduced the aggregate principal amount of commitments under the credit facility to $325.0 million, of which $100.0 million of the commitments matured in 2019. The remaining $225.0 million of commitments mature on October 22, 2020 exceptand are available, subject to the terms of the Amended Credit Facility, for $40revolving loans.

On October 2, 2018, Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., or DODI, as the U.S. borrower, and our subsidiary Diamond Foreign Asset Company, or DFAC, as the foreign borrower, entered into a senior 5-year revolving credit


agreement with a syndicate of lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (we refer to such credit agreement as the $950 Million Credit Facility). The maximum amount of borrowings available under the $950 Million Credit Facility is $950.0 million of commitments that mature on March 17, 2019 and $60 million of commitments that maturemay be used for general corporate purposes, including investments, acquisitions and capital expenditures. The $950 Million Credit Facility, which matures on October 22, 2019. In addition, we also have the option to increase the revolving commitments under the Credit Agreement by up to an additional $5002, 2023, provides for a swingline subfacility of $100.0 million from time to time, upon receiptand a letter of additional commitments from new or existing lenders, and to request one additionalone-year extensioncredit subfacility of the maturity date. $250.0 million.

The entire amount of borrowings available under the facility$950 Million Credit Facility is available subjectfor loans to its terms,DFAC, and a portion of such amount is available for revolving loans. Uploans to $250 millionDODI, based on a ratio as specified in the $950 Million Credit Facility. The obligations of DODI and DFAC under the $950 Million Credit Facility are each guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of DODI and DFAC, respectively, and 65% of the facility may be usedequity interest in DFAC is pledged as collateral for the issuance of performance or other standby letters of credit and up to $100 million may be used for swingline loans.

Revolving loansobligations under the $950 Million Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option, at a rate per annum basedFacility.

The $950 Million Credit Facility includes restrictions on either an alternate base rate, or ABR, or a Eurodollar Rate,borrowing if, after giving effect to any such borrowings and the application of the proceeds thereof, the aggregate amount of available cash, as defined in the $950 Million Credit Agreement, plusFacility, would exceed $500.0 million. In addition, the applicable interest margin for an ABR loan or a Eurodollar loan. Based on our current credit ratings, the applicable interest rate for ABRability to borrow revolving loans under the $950 Million Credit AgreementFacility is 0.25% over the greater of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) the dailyone-month Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00%. The applicable interest rate for Eurodollarconditioned on there being no unused commitments to advance loans under the Amended Credit Agreement is currently 1.25% over British Bankers’ Association LIBOR.Facility.

Swingline loans bear interest, at our option, at a rate per annum equalWe refer to (i) the ABR plus the applicable interest margin for ABR loans or (ii) the dailyone-month Eurodollar Rate plus the applicable interest margin for Eurodollar loans.

UnderAmended Credit Facility and $950 Million Credit Facility collectively as the Credit Agreement,Agreements. At December 31, 2019, we also pay, based on our current long-term credit ratings, and as applicable, other customary fees including, but not limited to, a commitment fee on the unused commitmentshad 0 borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement of 0.20% per annum andAgreements, however, in January 2020, a fronting fee to the issuing bank for each letter of credit. Participation fees for letters of credit are dependent upon the type of$6.0 million financial letter of credit was issued currently 0.625% per annum for performance lettersunder the $950 Million Credit Facility in support of credit and

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

1.25% per annum for all other lettersa previously issued surety bond. As of credit. Favorable changes in our current credit ratings could lower the fees that we payFebruary 7, 2020, there was approximately $1.2 billion available under the Credit Agreement; however, current interest rates and fees will apply should there be any further downgradeAgreements in our credit ratings.the aggregate, subject to their respective terms.

Covenants

The Amended Credit AgreementFacility contains customary covenants, including, but not limited to, maintenance of a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to total capitalization, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement,Facility, of not more than 60% at the end of each fiscal quarter, as well as limitations on liens; mergers, consolidations, liquidation and dissolution; changes in lines of business; swap agreements; transactions with affiliates; and subsidiary indebtedness. As

The $950 Million Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants, including (i) maintenance of a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to total capitalization not to exceed 60% at the end of each fiscal quarter, (ii) maintenance of a ratio of not less than 80% at the end of each fiscal quarter of (A) the aggregate value of certain rigs directly wholly owned by the borrowers and subsidiary guarantors to (B) the aggregate value of substantially all rigs owned by us and (iii) maintenance of a ratio of not less than 3:00 to 1:00 at the end of each fiscal quarter of (A) the sum of the aggregate value of all marketed rigs, as defined in the $950 Million Credit Facility, wholly owned directly by DFAC and certain foreign guarantors, as specified in the $950 Million Credit Facility, plus the value of the Ocean Valiant at any time when it is a marketed rig owned by a guarantor to (B) the sum of commitments under the $950 Million Credit Facility, the outstanding loans and letter of credit exposures under the Amended Credit Facility plus certain other indebtedness of DFAC and certain foreign guarantors, as specified in the $950 Million Credit Facility.

The $950 Million Credit Facility also contains additional covenants generally applicable to DODI and its subsidiaries that we consider usual and customary for an agreement of this type, including a limit on the payment of dividends if certain minimum cash balances are not maintained.

The Credit Agreements provide for customary events of default including, among others, a cross-default provision with respect to DODI’s and its subsidiaries’ other indebtedness in excess of $100.0 million. At December 31, 2017,2019, we were in compliance with all covenant requirements.requirements under the Credit Agreements.

Interest Rates and Fees

Revolving loans under the Credit Agreements bear interest, at our option, at a rate per annum based on either an alternate base rate, or ABR, or a Eurodollar Rate, as defined in the applicable Credit Agreement, plus the applicable interest margin for an ABR loan or a Eurodollar loan (determined based on our credit ratings). Swingline loans under the $950 Million Credit Facility bear interest, at our option, at a rate per annum equal to (i) the ABR plus the applicable


interest margin for ABR loans or (ii) the daily one-month Eurodollar Rate plus the applicable interest margin for Eurodollar loans.

Under the Credit Agreements, we also pay, based on our current long-term credit ratings, and as applicable, other customary fees including, but not limited to, a commitment fee on the unused commitments under each of the Credit Agreements and a fronting fee to the issuing bank for each letter of credit. Participation fees for letters of credit are dependent upon the type of letter of credit issued.

The following summarizes the interest rate margins and fees payable under the Credit Agreements, based on our current long-term credit ratings:

Amended Credit Facility

$950 Million Credit Facility

Revolving Loans:

ABR

0.25% over the greater of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) the daily one-month Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00%

3.25% over the greater of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) the daily one-month Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00%

Eurodollar

1.25% over specified LIBOR

4.25% over specified LIBOR

Swingline Loans

N/A

At our option, at a rate per annum equal to (i) the ABR plus the applicable interest margin for ABR loans or (ii) the daily one-month Eurodollar Rate plus the applicable interest margin for Eurodollar loans

Letter of credit participation fees:

Performance letters of credit

N/A

2.125% per annum

All other letters of credit

N/A

4.25% per annum

Commitment fee on unused

commitments under credit

agreement

    0.20% per annum

    0.70% per annum

Favorable changes in our current credit ratings could lower the interest rate margins and fees that we pay under the Credit Agreements; however, current interest rates and fees under the Credit Agreements will apply should there be any further downgrade in our credit ratings.

Senior Notes

At December 31, 2017, we had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement. At February 9, 2018, we had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement and an additional $1.5 billion available. At December 31, 2016, we had $104.2 million in borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement that bore interest at a weighted average interest rate of 1.9%.

Senior Notes

At December 31, 2017,2019, our senior notes were comprised of the following debt issues:issues (dollars in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Semiannual

  Principal Amount      Interest Rate Semiannual
Interest  Payment
Dates

 

Principal

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate

 

 

Interest Payment

Debt Issue

  (In millions)   Maturity Date  Coupon Effective 

 

Amount

 

 

Maturity Date

 

Coupon

 

 

Effective

 

 

Dates

3.45% Senior Notes due 2023

  $250.0   November 1, 2023  3.45% 3.50% May 1 and November 1

 

$

250.0

 

 

November 1, 2023

 

 

3.45

%

 

 

3.50

%

 

May 1 and November 1

7.875% Senior Notes due 2025

  $500.0   August 15, 2025  7.875% 8.00% February 15 and August 15

 

$

500.0

 

 

August 15, 2025

 

 

7.875

%

 

 

8.00

%

 

February 15 and August 15

5.70% Senior Notes due 2039

  $500.0   October 15, 2039  5.70% 5.75% April 15 and October 15

 

$

500.0

 

 

October 15, 2039

 

 

5.70

%

 

 

5.75

%

 

April 15 and October 15

4.875% Senior Notes due 2043

  $750.0   November 1, 2043  4.875% 4.89% May 1 and November 1

 

$

750.0

 

 

November 1, 2043

 

 

4.875

%

 

 

4.89

%

 

May 1 and November 1


At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the carrying value of our senior notes, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs, was as follows:follows (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

 

  December 31, 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

  2017   2016 
  (In thousands) 

5.875% Senior Notes due 2019

  $   $498,679 

3.45% Senior Notes due 2023

   248,162    247,879 

 

$

248,759

 

 

$

248,455

 

7.875% Senior Notes due 2025

   489,420     

 

 

491,655

 

 

 

490,491

 

5.70% Senior Notes due 2039

   492,971    492,812 

 

 

493,316

 

 

 

493,139

 

4.875% Senior Notes due 2043

   741,672    741,514 

 

 

742,011

 

 

 

741,837

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total senior notes, net

  $1,972,225   $1,980,884 

 

$

1,975,741

 

 

$

1,973,922

 

  

 

   

 

 

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

As of December 31, 2017,2019, the aggregate annual maturity of our senior notes, excluding net unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs of $8.1$7.0 million and $19.7$17.3 million, respectively, was as follows:follows (in thousands):

 

  Aggregate
Principal
Amount
 
  (In thousands) 

 

Aggregate

Principal

Amount

 

Year Ending December 31,

  

 

 

 

 

2018

  $ 

2019

    

2020

    

 

$

 

2021

    

 

 

 

2022

    

 

 

 

2023

 

 

250,000

 

2024

 

 

 

Thereafter

   2,000,000 

 

 

1,750,000

 

  

 

 

Total maturities of senior notes

  $2,000,000 

 

$

2,000,000

 

  

 

 

Senior

Notes Due 2019Redemption. In August 2017, we redeemed all of our outstanding 5.875% senior notes due 2019, or 2019 Notes, for a redemption price of $543.0 million in the aggregate, including accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. We accounted for the redemption as an extinguishment of debt and reported a corresponding loss of $35.4 million in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Senior Notes Due 2025. In August 2017, we issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured 7.875% senior notes due 2025, or 2025 Notes, and received net proceeds of $489.1 million after deducting underwritingdeduction of underwriter discounts, commissions and estimated expenses. The 2025 Notes bear interest at 7.875% per year and mature on August 15, 2025. Interest on the 2025 Notes is payable semiannually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year, beginning February 15, 2018. We used the net proceeds from the 2025 Notes, together with cash on hand, to fund the redemption of our previously outstanding 2019 Notes.

The 2025 Notes are unsecured obligations of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.,DODI, and rank equally in right of payment to all of its existing and future senior indebtedness, and are structurally subordinated to all existing and future obligations of our subsidiaries. We have the right to redeem some or all of the 2025 Notes at any time or from time to time, on at least 15 days but not more than 60 days prior written notice, at the applicable redemption price specified in the governing indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption. The 2025 Notes contain customary covenants including limitations on liens, mergers, consolidations and certain sales of assets and on entering into sale and lease-back transactions covering a drilling rig or drillship, as specified in the governing indenture.redemption.

Senior Notes Due 2023 and 2043. Our 3.45% Senior Notes due 2023 and 4.875% Senior Notes due 2043 are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.,DODI, and rank equally in right of payment to all of its existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness, and are effectively subordinated to all existing and future obligations of our subsidiaries. We have the right to redeem all or a portion of these notes for cash at any time or from time to time, on at least 15 days but not more than 60 days prior written notice, at a make-whole redemption price specified in the governing indenture (if applicable) plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption.

Senior Notes Due 2039. Our 5.70% Senior Notes due 2039 are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.DODI, and rank equally in right of payment to all of its existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

indebtedness, and are effectively subordinated to all existing and future obligations of our subsidiaries. We have the right to redeem all or a portion of these notes for cash at any time or from time to time, on at least 15 days but not more than 60 days prior written notice, at the redemption price specified in the governing indenture plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption.

10.Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table sets forth the components of “Other comprehensive gain (loss)” and the related income tax effects thereon for the three years ended December 31, 2017 and the cumulative balances in AOCGL by component at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

   Unrealized Gain (Loss) on   Total
AOCGL
 
   Derivative
Financial
Instruments
   Marketable
Securities
   
   (In thousands) 

Balance at January 1, 2015

   (3,504   (101   (3,605

Change in other comprehensive loss before reclassifications, after tax of $846 and $(1)

   (1,574   (4,940   (6,514

Reclassification adjustments for items included in Net Loss, after tax of $(2,737) and $0

   5,084        5,084 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

   3,510    (4,940   (1,430
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2015

   6    (5,041   (5,035

Change in other comprehensive loss before reclassifications, after tax of $0 and $2

       (6,559   (6,559

Reclassification adjustments for items included in Net Loss, after tax of $3 and $0

   (5   11,600    11,595 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive (loss) income

   (5   5,041    5,036 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

   1        1 

Reclassification adjustments for items included in Net Loss, after tax of $2 and $0

   (6       (6
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive loss

   (6       (6
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

  $(5  $   $(5
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

The following table presents the line items2025 Notes, 3.45% Senior Notes due 2023, 4.875% Senior Notes due 2043 and 5.70% Senior Notes due 2039 contain customary covenants including limitations on liens, mergers, consolidations and certain sales of assets and on entering into sale and lease-back transactions covering a drilling rig or drillship, as specified in our Consolidated Statementseach governing indenture. As of Operations affected by reclassification adjustments outDecember 31, 2019, we were in compliance with all of AOCGL.these covenants.

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Major Components of AOCGL

 Year Ended December 31,  

Consolidated Statements of
Operations Line Items

  2017  2016  2015   
  (In thousands)   

Derivative financial instruments:

    

Unrealized loss on FOREX contracts

 $  $  $7,829  Contract drilling, excluding depreciation

Unrealized gain on Treasury Lock Agreements

  (8  (8  (8 Interest expense
  2   3   (2,737 Income tax expense (benefit)
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  
 $(6 $(5 $5,084  Net of tax
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Marketable securities:

    

Unrealized loss on marketable securities

 $  $11,600  $  Other, net
          Income tax expense
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  
 $  $11,600  $  Net of tax
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

11.Commitments and Contingencies

Various claims have been filed against us in the ordinary course of business, including claims by offshore workers alleging personal injuries. With respect to each claim or exposure, we have made an assessment, in accordance with GAAP, of the probability that the resolution of the matter would ultimately result in a loss. When we determine that an unfavorable resolution of a matter is probable and such amount of loss can be determined, we record a liability for the amount of the estimated loss at the time that both of these criteria are met. Our management believes that we have recorded adequate accruals for any liabilities that may reasonably be expected to result from these claims.

Patent Litigation. On August 30, 2017, an affiliate of Transocean Ltd., or Transocean, an offshore drilling contractor, filed a lawsuit against us and one of our subsidiaries in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, alleging that we infringed certain United States patents previously owned by Transocean or its affiliates or employees pertaining to certain dual-activity drilling operations. The lawsuit alleges that we infringed the patents by the unauthorized sale, offer for sale, and importation and use of four of our drilling rigs (Ocean Blackhawk,Ocean BlackHornet,Ocean BlackRhino andOcean BlackLion) and is seeking unspecified monetary damages. The Transocean patents, which expired in May 2016, do not apply to drilling activities outside the United States or to activities that occurred after the expiration of the patents. We are unable to estimate our potential exposure, if any, to the Transocean lawsuit at this time but do not believe that our ultimate liability, if any, resulting from this litigation will have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Asbestos Litigation.We. We are one of several unrelated defendants in lawsuits filed in Louisiana state courts alleging that defendants manufactured, distributed or utilized drilling mud containing asbestos and, in our case, allowed such drilling mud to have been utilized aboard our drilling rigs. The plaintiffs seek, among other things, an award of unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. The manufacture and use of asbestos-containing drilling mud had already ceased before we acquired any of the drilling rigs addressed in these lawsuits. We believe that we are not liable for the damages asserted in the lawsuits pursuant to the terms of our 1989 asset purchase agreement with Diamond M Corporation. We are unable to estimate our potential exposure, if any, to these lawsuits at this time but do not believe that our ultimate

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

liability, if any, resulting from this litigation will have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations orand cash flows, including negative cash flows.

Non-Income Tax and Related Claims. We have received assessments related to, or otherwise have exposure to, non-income tax items such as sales-and-use tax, value-added tax, ad valorem tax, custom duties, and other similar taxes in various taxing jurisdictions. We have determined that we have a probable loss for these taxes and the related penalties and interest and, accordingly, have recorded a $16.1 million and $12.3 million liability at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. We intend to defend these matters vigorously; however, the ultimate outcome of these assessments and exposures could result in additional taxes, interest and penalties for which the fully assessed amounts would have a material adverse effect on our financial statements

Other Litigation.We have been named in various other claims, lawsuits or threatened actions that are incidental to the ordinary course of our business, including a claim by one of our customers in Brazil, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A., or Petrobras, that it will seek to recover from its contractors, including us, any taxes, penalties, interest and fees that it must pay to the Brazilian tax authorities for our applicable portion of withholding taxes related to Petrobras’ charter agreements with its contractors. We intend to defend these matters vigorously; however, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and the ultimate outcome or effect of any claim, lawsuit or action cannot be predicted with certainty. As a result, there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of any litigation matter. Any claims against us, whether meritorious or not, could cause us to incur significant costs and expenses and require significant amounts of management and operational time and resources. In the opinion of our management, no such pending or known threatened claims, actions or proceedings against us are expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Personal Injury Claims. Under our current insurance policies, which renewed effective May 1, 2017, our deductibles for marine liability insurance coverage with respect to personal injury claims not related to named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, which primarily result from Jones Act liability in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, are $10.0$5.0 million for the first occurrence with no aggregate deductible, and vary in amounts ranging between $5.0 million and, if aggregate claims exceed certain thresholds, up to $100.0 million for each subsequent occurrence, depending on the nature, severity and frequency of claims that might arise during the policy year. Our deductibledeductibles for personal injury claims arising due to named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico isare $25.0 million for the first occurrence with no aggregate deductible, and vary in amounts ranging between $25.0 million and, if aggregate claims exceed certain thresholds, up to $100.0 million for each subsequent occurrence, depending on the nature, severity and frequency of claims that might arise during the policy year.


The Jones Act is a federal law that permits seamen to seek compensation for certain injuries during the course of their employment on a vessel and governs the liability of vessel operators and marine employers for the work-related injury or death of an employee. We engage outside consultants to assist us in estimating our aggregate liability for personal injury claims based on our historical losses and utilizing various actuarial models. We allocate a portion of the aggregate liability to “Accrued liabilities” based on an estimate of claims expected to be paid within the next twelve months with the residual recorded as “Other liabilities.” At December 31, 20172019, our estimated liability for personal injury claims was $30.9$17.4 million, of which $5.2$6.4 million and $25.7$11.0 million were recorded in “Accrued liabilities” and “Other liabilities,” respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 20162018, our estimated liability for personal injury claims was $32.9$27.9 million, of which $6.1$5.2 million and $26.8$22.7 million were recorded in “Accrued liabilities” and “Other liabilities,” respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The eventual settlement or adjudication of these claims could differ materially from our estimated amounts due to uncertainties such as:

the severity of personal injuries claimed;

significant changes in the volume of personal injury claims;

the unpredictability of legal jurisdictions where the claims will ultimately be litigated;

inconsistent court decisions; and

the risks and lack of predictability inherent in personal injury litigation.

significant changes in the volume of personal injury claims;

the unpredictability of legal jurisdictions where the claims will ultimately be litigated;

inconsistent court decisions; and

the risks and lack of predictability inherent in personal injury litigation.

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Purchase Obligations. At December 31, 2017,2019, we had no0 purchase obligations for major rig upgrades or any other significant obligations, except for those related to our direct rig operations, which arise during the normal course of business.

Operating Leases.We lease office and yard facilities, housing,non-rig equipment and vehicles under operating leases, which expire at various times through the year 2022. Total rent expense amounted to $3.9 million, $5.5 million and $7.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Future minimum rental payments under leases are approximately $1.7 million and $0.5 million for 2018 and 2019, respectively, and an aggregate of $0.3 million for the years 2020 through 2022.

In addition, we lease certain blowout preventer equipment, or BOP, and related well control equipment underten-year operating leases. See Note 12.

Letters of Credit and Other.We were contingently liable as of December 31, 2017 in the amount of $20.4 million under certain performance, supersedeas, tax, bid and customs bonds and letters of credit. Agreements relating to approximately $14.8 million of supersedeas, tax and customs bonds can require collateral at any time. As of December 31, 2017, we had not been required to make any collateral deposits with respect to these agreements. The remaining agreements cannot require collateral except in events of default. On our behalf, banks have issued letters of credit securing certain of these bonds.

12.Sale and Leaseback Transactions

Services Agreement. In February 2016, we entered into aten-year agreement with a subsidiary of Baker Hughes Company (formerly named Baker Hughes, a GE Oil & Gas,company), or GE,Baker Hughes, to provide services with respect to certain blowout preventer and related well control equipment, or Well Control Equipment, on our four drillships. Such services include management of maintenance, certification and reliability with respect to such equipment.

In connection with the contractual services agreement with GE, we completed four sale and leaseback transactions with another GE affiliate during 2016 with respect to the Well Control Equipment on our four drillships. As a result of these transactions, we received an aggregate of $210.0 million in proceeds from the sale of the Well Control Equipment, which was less than the carrying value of the equipment. The resulting difference was recorded as prepaid rent with no gain or loss recognized on the transactions. The prepaid rent will be amortized over the respective terms of the operating leases. Future commitments under the operating leases and contractual services agreements are estimated to be approximately $65.0$39 million per year or an estimated $550.0$250 million in the aggregate over the remaining term of the agreements. During

In addition, we lease Well Control Equipment for our drillships under ten-year operating leases. See Note 11.

Letters of Credit and Other. We were contingently liable as of December 31, 2019 in the amount of $37.1 million under certain tax, performance, supersedeas, VAT and customs bonds and letters of credit. Agreements relating to approximately $28.5 million of customs, tax, VAT and supersedeas bonds can require collateral at any time, while the remaining agreements, aggregating $8.6 million, cannot require collateral except in events of default. As of December 31, 2019, we had not been required to make any collateral deposits with respect to these agreements. However, in January 2020, we were required to issue a $6.0 million financial letter of credit as collateral in support of our outstanding surety bonds.

11. Leases and Lease Commitments

Our leasing activities primarily consist of operating leases for shorebase offices, office and information technology equipment, employee housing, vehicles, onshore storage yards and certain rig equipment and tools. Our leases have terms ranging from one month to ten years, some of which include options to extend the lease for up to five years and/or to terminate the lease within one year.

Additionally, we are participants in four sale and leaseback arrangements with a subsidiary of Baker Hughes pursuant to the 2016 sale of Well Control Equipment on our drillships and corresponding agreements to lease back that equipment under ten-year operating leases for approximately $26 million per year in the aggregate with renewal options for two successive five-year periods. At the time of the transactions with Baker Hughes, the carrying value of the Well Control Equipment exceeded the aggregate proceeds received from the sale, resulting in the recognition of prepaid rent, which was being amortized over the respective terms of the leases. On January 1, 2019, as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-02, the aggregate remaining prepaid rent balances of $3.9 million and $10.6 million, previously recorded as “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and “Other assets,” respectively, were


reclassified to a right-of-use lease asset within “Other assets” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and continue to be amortized over the remaining terms of the leases.

In applying ASU 2016-02, we utilized an exemption for short-term leases whereby we did not record leases with terms of one year or less on the balance sheet. We have also made an accounting policy election not to separate lease components from non-lease components for each of our classes of underlying assets, except for subsea equipment, which includes the Well Control Equipment discussed above. At inception, the consideration for the overall Well Control Equipment arrangement was allocated between the lease and service components based on an estimation of stand-alone selling price of each component, which maximized observable inputs. The costs associated with the service portion of the agreement are accounted for separately from the cost attributable to the equipment leases based on that allocation and thus, are not included in our right-of-use lease asset or lease liability balances. The non-lease components for each of our other classes of assets generally relate to maintenance, monitoring and security services and are not separated from their respective lease components. See Note 10.

The lease term used for calculating our right-of-use assets and lease liabilities is determined by considering the noncancelable lease term, as well as any extension options that we are reasonably certain to exercise. The determination to include option periods is generally made by considering the activity in the region or for the rig corresponding to the respective lease, among other contract-based and market-based factors. We have used our incremental borrowing rate to discount future lease payments as the rate implicit in our leases is not readily determinable.  To arrive at our incremental borrowing rate, we consider our unsecured borrowings and then adjust those rates to assume full collateralization and to factor in the individual lease term and payment structure.

Total operating lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $39.7 million of which $3.4 million related to short-term leases. Total operating lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and 2016, we recognized $61.7was $30.1 million and $34.0$30.6 million, respectively, in aggregate expenserespectively.

Supplemental information related to leases is as follows (in thousands, except weighted-average data):

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

2019

 

Operating cash flows used for operating leases

 

$

39,561

 

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease

   liabilities

 

 

26,248

 

Weighted-average remaining lease term

 

6.7 years

 

Weighted-average discount rate

 

 

8.68

%

Future minimum rental payments under noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2018 were as follows (in thousands):

2019

 

$

28,373

 

2020

 

 

27,144

 

2021

 

 

26,565

 

2022

 

 

26,281

 

2023

 

 

26,280

 

Thereafter

 

 

64,062

 

Total lease payments

 

$

198,705

 


Maturities of lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019 are as follows (in thousands):

2020

 

$

32,888

 

2021

 

 

30,548

 

2022

 

 

29,973

 

2023

 

 

29,499

 

2024

 

 

29,580

 

Thereafter

 

 

51,784

 

Total lease payments

 

 

204,272

 

Less: interest

 

 

(50,348

)

Total lease liability

 

$

153,924

 

Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets:

 

 

 

 

Accrued liabilities

 

$

20,030

 

Other liabilities

 

 

133,894

 

Total operating lease liability

 

$

153,924

 

Operating lease assets, including prepaid rent balances related to the Well Control Equipment leases and contractual services agreements.Baker Hughes transaction, totaling $169.2 million are included in “Other assets” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019.

As of December 31, 2019, we had an additional operating lease for mooring equipment to be used on a rig that had not yet commenced. The agreement, which commenced in January 2020, provides for fixed lease payments of approximately $5 million in the aggregate to be paid over a lease term of 5 years.

13.Related-Party Transactions

12. Related-Party Transactions

Transactions with Loews.We are party to a services agreement with Loews, or the Services Agreement, pursuant to which Loews performs certain administrative and technical services on our behalf. Such services include personnel, internal auditing accounting,services and cash management services, in addition to advice and assistance with respect to preparation of tax returns and obtaining insurance. Under the Services Agreement, we are required to reimburse Loews for (i) allocated personnel costscost (such as salaries, employee benefits and payroll taxes) of the Loews personnel actually providing such services and (ii) allout-of-pocket expenses related to the provision of such services. The Services

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Agreement may be terminated at our option upon 30 days’ notice to Loews and at the option of Loews upon six months’ notice to us. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify Loews for all claims and damages arising from the provision of services by Loews under the Services Agreement unless due to the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Loews. We were charged $1.0$0.7 million, $1.0$0.6 million and $1.3$1.0 million by Loews for these support functions during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016respectively.

13. Restructuring and 2015, respectively.Separation Costs

Transactions with Other Related Parties.We hire marine vessels and helicopter transportation services at the prevailing market rate from subsidiaries of SEACOR Holdings Inc., SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. and Era Group Inc. We paid $47,000, $0.7 million and $6.0 million for the hire of such vessels and such services during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. A member of our Board of Directors serves as the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of SEACOR Holdings Inc., theNon-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. and theNon-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Era Group Inc.

14.Restructuring and Separation Costs

In late 2017, in response to expectations at the time that a recovery of the offshore drilling market willwould not occur in the near term, combined with changes to the size and composition of our drilling fleet since 2015, we reviewed our global cost and organizational structure, including the way in which we market our services in certain countries. As a result, our management approved and initiated a reduction in workforce at our onshore bases and corporate facilities, as well as the negotiation of a termination of our agency agreement in Brazil, also referred to as the 2017 Reduction Plan. As of December 31, 2017, appropriate communications had been made to substantially all impacted personnel, and weBrazil. We incurred $14.1 million in restructuring and employee separation related costs during 2017. Accrued costs associated with the 2017, Reduction Plan were $13.6 million as of December 31, 2017, of whichincluding $11.5 million is related to the termination of our Brazilian agency agreement,agreement. During 2018, we incurred an additional $5.0 million in severance and related costs for redundant employees identified in 2018 in connection with the restructuring plan and paid $12.4 million in previously accrued costs. During 2019, all remaining obligations under the restructuring plan were settled.

14. Income Taxes

Several of our rigs are owned by Swiss branches of entities incorporated in the U.K. that have historically been taxed under a special tax regime pursuant to Swiss corporate income tax rules. On September 3, 2019, the Swiss federal government, along with the Canton of Zug, enacted tax legislation, which is expectedwe refer to as Swiss Tax Reform, effective as of January 1, 2020. Swiss Tax Reform significantly changed Swiss corporate income tax rules by,


among other things, abolishing special tax regimes. The legislation also provides transition rules under which companies can maintain their current basis of taxation through January 1, 2022.

The abolition of special tax regimes will require us to determine our Swiss tax liability on a net income basis beginning on January 1, 2022, thus also requiring deferred taxes to be paidcomputed on the difference between the Swiss tax basis and U.S. GAAP basis of certain items, including property, plant and equipment. There are still many uncertainties in the first quarterapplication of 2018,Swiss Tax Reform, including the values to be used to measure depreciable property. Therefore, we have recorded a $74.2 million net deferred tax asset for the difference in basis of certain of our rigs between Swiss tax and $2.1 millionU.S. GAAP, offset, where appropriate, by a reserve for an uncertain tax position. As further clarification is relatedissued by the Swiss tax authorities, deferred tax balances and the reserve for uncertain tax positions may need to severance paymentsbe adjusted. The potential changes could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In 2019, the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, issued final regulations with respect to two former executives, payable over a two year period.

During 2015,the calculation of the toll charge associated with the deemed repatriation of previously deferred earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries, or Transition Tax, in response to depressed conditions in the offshore drilling market at that time, we reviewed our cost and organization structure, and, as a result, our management approved and initiated a reduction in workforce at our onshore bases and corporate facilities, also referred to as the 2015 Reduction Plan. During 2015, we paid $9.8 million in restructuring and employee separation related costs to impacted personnel.

15.Income Taxes

On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in 2017, commonly referred to as the Tax Reform Act. TheBased on the new regulations, we recorded a net tax benefit of $14.2 million in the second quarter of 2019, primarily to reverse a previously recorded uncertain tax position related to the Transition Tax. Consequently, our revised net tax benefit associated with the Tax Reform Act amended the Internal Revenue Code in several areas that had a direct and immediate effect on our results of operations and statement of financial position as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, including, among other items, aone-time mandatory deemed repatriation of accumulated earnings of our foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and a reduction in the U.S corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in January 2018. As a result of these changes, we recorded a provisional net tax expense of $1.1is $34.5 million, during the fourth quarter of 2017, consistingwhich now consists of (i) a $75.4$38.0 million charge relating to theone-time mandatory repatriation of previously deferred earnings of certainnon-US subsidiaries that are owned either wholly or partially by our U.S. subsidiaries, inclusive of the utilization of certain tax attributes offset by a provisional liability for uncertain tax positions related to such attributes and (ii) a $74.3$72.5 million credit resulting from the remeasurementdetermination and re-measurement of our net U.S. deferred tax liabilities at the lower corporate income tax rate.

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Also on December 22, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which allows companies to report the income tax effects of the Tax Reform Act as a provisional amount based on a reasonable estimate, which would be subject to adjustment during a reasonable measurement period, not to exceed twelve months, until the accounting and analysis under ASC 740 is complete. Due to the timing of the enactment of the Tax Reform Act, there continues to be a significant amount of uncertainty as to the appropriate application of a number of the underlying provisions, pending further guidance and clarification from the relevant authorities. We will continue to monitor developments in this area and adjust our estimates throughout the year in 2018, as and if necessary, as additional guidance and clarification becomes available. Our provisional estimate of the tax effect of the Tax Reform Act is a net charge of $1.1 million as discussed above. We are still in the process of evaluating our estimate as it relates to the tax effect of (i) the mandatory, deemed repatriation aspect of the Tax Reform Act, (ii) the amount of deferred tax assets and liabilities subject to the income tax rate change from 35% to 21%, and (iii) the ability to more likely than not realize the benefit of deferred tax assets, including net operating losses and foreign tax credits. Any adjustments to these provisional amounts will be reported as a component of “Tax expense (benefit)” in the reporting period in which such adjustments are determined, which will be no later than the fourth quarter of 2018.

Our income tax expense is a function of the mix between our domestic and internationalpre-tax earnings or losses, as well as the mix of international tax jurisdictions in which we operate.operate and recognition of valuation allowances for deferred tax assets for which the tax benefits are not likely to be realized. Certain of our rigs are owned and operated, directly or indirectly, by Diamond Foreign Asset Company, or DFAC. We currently intend to indefinitelyOur management has determined that we will no longer permanently reinvest foreign earnings.As of December 31, 2019, we recorded $0.4 million for the earningswithholding income tax impact associated with the potential distribution of DFAC and its foreign subsidiaries to finance foreign activities. Except to the extent of the U.S. tax provided under the Tax Reform Act or other required U.S. tax provision, weDFAC’s earnings. We have not provided income tax on the outside basis difference of this subsidiary nor provided forour international subsidiaries as management does not intend to dispose of these subsidiaries and structuring alternatives exist to mitigate any withholding or other tax that may be applicablepotential liability should a future distribution be made from any unremitted earnings of this subsidiary. Itdisposition take place. The potential unrecorded tax liability associated with the outside basis difference is not practical to estimate this potential liability.approximately $95 million.  

The components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:follows (in thousands):

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2017   2016   2015 
   (In thousands) 

Federal — current

  $6,994   $230   $63,223 

State — current

   95    (60   93 

Foreign — current

   25,252    10,297    71,655 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current

   32,341    10,467    134,971 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Federal — deferred

   (85,066   (108,274   (245,045

Foreign — deferred

   12,939    2,011    3,011 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred

   (72,127   (106,263   (242,034
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $(39,786  $(95,796  $(107,063
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Federal – current

 

$

(13,810

)

 

$

20,107

 

 

$

6,994

 

State – current

 

 

19

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

95

 

Foreign – current

 

 

25,899

 

 

 

9,531

 

 

 

25,252

 

Total current

 

 

12,108

 

 

 

29,640

 

 

 

32,341

 

Federal – deferred

 

 

(67,015

)

 

 

(75,279

)

 

 

(85,066

)

Foreign – deferred

 

 

10,107

 

 

 

(714

)

 

 

12,939

 

Total deferred

 

 

(56,908

)

 

 

(75,993

)

 

 

(72,127

)

Total

 

$

(44,800

)

 

$

(46,353

)

 

$

(39,786

)

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 


The difference between actual income tax expense and the tax provision computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before taxes is attributable to the following:following (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

  2017   2016   2015 
  (In thousands) 

Income before income tax expense:

      

(Loss) income before income tax expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

  $(241,178  $(146,037  $(11,158

 

$

(339,072

)

 

$

(266,855

)

 

$

(241,178

)

Foreign

   219,738    (322,262   (370,190

 

 

(62,942

)

 

 

40,230

 

 

 

219,738

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

$

(402,014

)

 

$

(226,625

)

 

$

(21,440

)

  $(21,440  $(468,299  $(381,348
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Expected income tax benefit at federal statutory rate

  $(7,504  $(163,905  $(133,472

 

$

(84,423

)

 

$

(47,591

)

 

$

(7,504

)

Effect of tax rate changes

   (74,294        

 

 

(74,168

)

 

 

1,763

 

 

 

(74,294

)

Mandatory repatriation of earnings pursuant to Tax Reform and Jobs Act

   94,194         

Mandatory repatriation of earnings pursuant to

Tax Reform Act

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

94,194

 

Effect of foreign operations

   (42,102   48,573    (4,906

 

 

3,129

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

(42,102

)

Amortization of deferred charges associated with intercompany rig sales to other tax jurisdictions

           38,466 

Valuation allowance

   (41,492   62,400     

 

 

11,650

 

 

 

11,929

 

 

 

(41,492

)

Uncertain tax positions, settlements and adjustments relating to prior years

   31,726    (34,666   (1,114

 

 

96,960

 

 

 

(15,777

)

 

 

31,726

 

Other

   (314   (8,198   (6,037

 

 

2,052

 

 

 

3,308

 

 

 

(314

)

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income tax benefit

  $(39,786  $(95,796  $(107,063

 

$

(44,800

)

 

$

(46,353

)

 

$

(39,786

)

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

 

Deferred Income Taxes.Significant components of our deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows:follows (in thousands):

 

   December 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (In thousands) 

Deferred tax assets:

    

Net operating loss carryforwards, or NOLs

  $133,298   $159,653 

Foreign tax credits

   27,623    95,145 

Worker’s compensation and other current accruals

   10,330    14,824 

Bareboat charter deductions

       23,353 

UK depreciation deduction

   52,800    21,222 

Anticipatory deductions and credits

   13,111     

Deferred compensation

   3,711    4,689 

Foreign contribution taxes

   3,806    3,857 

Stock compensation awards

   6,872    11,679 

Deferred deductions

   94    8,185 

Other

   3,748    2,526 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   255,393    345,133 

Valuation allowance

   (169,224   (210,716
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

   86,169    134,417 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

    

Property, plant and equipment

   (236,038   (284,480

Mobilization

   (17,192   (46,274

Other

   (238   (674
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (253,468   (331,428
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net deferred tax liability

  $(167,299  $(197,011
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

We record a valuation allowance to derecognize a portion of our deferred tax assets, which we do not expect to be ultimately realized. A summary of changes in the valuation allowance is as follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating loss carryforwards, or NOLs

 

$

253,973

 

 

$

209,679

 

Foreign tax credits

 

 

43,026

 

 

 

43,225

 

Disallowed interest deduction

 

 

40,777

 

 

 

16,248

 

Worker’s compensation and other current

   accruals

 

 

6,250

 

 

 

8,375

 

Deferred deductions

 

 

12,345

 

 

 

10,481

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

7,209

 

 

 

 

Operating lease liability

 

 

5,461

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

4,367

 

 

 

6,380

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

 

373,408

 

 

 

294,388

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(186,620

)

 

 

(174,970

)

Net deferred tax assets

 

 

186,788

 

 

 

119,418

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

(225,643

)

 

 

(212,251

)

Mobilization

 

 

(2,245

)

 

 

(11,012

)

Right-of-use assets

 

 

(5,461

)

 

 

 

Other

 

 

(967

)

 

 

(535

)

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(234,316

)

 

 

(223,798

)

Net deferred tax liability

 

$

(47,528

)

 

$

(104,380

)

 

   For the Year Ended December 31, 
   2017   2016   2015 
   (In thousands) 

Valuation allowance as of January 1

  $210,716   $146,647   $48,036 

Establishment of valuation allowances:

      

Net operating losses

   20,805    10,318    82,155 

Foreign tax credits

   2,877    62,400     

Other deferred tax assets

   14,213    4,823    27,928 

Releases of valuation allowances in various jurisdictions

   (79,387   (13,472   (11,472
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Valuation allowance as of December 31

  $169,224   $210,716   $146,647 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Operating Loss Carryforwards. As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had recorded a deferred tax asset of $133.3$254.0 million for the benefit of NOL carryforwards, $18.1comprised of $149.4 million related to our U.S. losses and $115.2$104.6 million related to our international operations. Approximately $73.5$154.7 million of this deferred tax asset relates to NOL carryforwards that have an

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

indefinite life. The remaining $59.8$99.3 million relates to NOL carryforwards in several of our foreign subsidiaries, as well as in the United States.U.S. Unless utilized, thethese NOL carryforwards will expire between 2021 and 2037 as follows:2038.


Year Expiring

  Tax Benefit of
NOL

Carryforwards
(In millions)
 

2021

  $5.1 

2022

   0.2 

2023

   0.1 

2025

   28.7 

2027

   7.6 

2036

   17.9 

2037

   0.2 
  

 

 

 

Total

  $59.8 
  

 

 

 

Foreign Tax Credits. As of December 31, 2017, a valuation allowance for $110.9 million has been recorded for our NOLs for which the deferred tax assets are not likely to be realized.

Foreign Tax Credits.As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had recorded a deferred tax asset of $27.6$43.0 million for the benefit of foreign tax credits in the U.S. Unless, all of which will expire, unless utilized, between 2020 to 2030.

Valuation Allowances. We record a valuation allowance on a portion of our excessdeferred tax assets not expected to be ultimately realized. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we established valuation allowances related to net operating losses, foreign tax credits and other deferred tax assets of $27.6$30.7 million, in the U.S. will expire in 2019$35.2 million and in$37.9 million, respectively. During the years 2024ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we released valuation allowances in various jurisdictions of $19.0 million, $23.3 million and $79.4 million, respectively. The valuation allowance was also reduced by a $6.2 million adjustment to 2027 as follows:retained earnings at January 1, 2018 in connection with our adoption of ASU 2016-16. See Note 1 “General Information - Changes in Accounting Principles - Income Taxes.”

Year Expiring

  Foreign Tax
Credits

(In millions)
 

2019

  $0.8 

2024

   3.1 

2025

   3.5 

2026

   20.0 

2027

   0.2 
  

 

 

 

Total

  $27.6 
  

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2017, a2019, valuation allowance of $26.7allowances aggregating $186.6 million hashave been recorded for our net operating losses, foreign tax credits and other deferred tax assets for which the deferred tax assetsbenefits are not likely to be realized.

Valuation Allowances — Other Deferred Tax Assets.As of December 31, 2017, we recorded valuation allowances for other deferred tax assets of $31.6 million.

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Unrecognized Tax Benefits.Our income tax returns are subject to review and examination in the various jurisdictions in which we operate, and we are currently contesting various tax assessments. We accrue for income tax contingencies, or uncertain tax positions, that we believe are morenot likely than not exposures.to be realized. A reconciliationrollforward of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, gross of tax carryforwards and excluding interest and penalties, is as follows:follows (in thousands):

 

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
  2017   2016   2015 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

  (In thousands) 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Balance, beginning of period

  $(34,970  $(53,952  $(57,116

 

$

(55,943

)

 

$

(81,864

)

 

$

(34,970

)

Additions for current year tax positions

   (51,260   (4,233   (7,013

 

 

(85,970

)

 

 

(2,906

)

 

 

(51,260

)

Additions for prior year tax positions

   (2,938   (1,020   (82

 

 

(2,113

)

 

 

(20,943

)

 

 

(2,938

)

Reductions for prior year tax positions

   623    19,661    2,673 

 

 

23,267

 

 

 

49,175

 

 

 

623

 

Reductions related to statute of limitation expirations

   6,681    4,574    7,586 

 

 

1,875

 

 

 

595

 

 

 

6,681

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Balance, end of period

  $(81,864  $(34,970  $(53,952

 

$

(118,884

)

 

$

(55,943

)

 

$

(81,864

)

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

The $51.3 million addition tofor current year tax positions for 2017in 2019 is primarily attributabledue to a provisionalrecent change in Switzerland tax legislation. Due to the uncertainties regarding the application of Swiss Tax Reform, including the values to be used to measure depreciable property, a liability associated withfor an uncertain tax position was recorded in the useamount of $ 86.2 million. The $23.3 million reduction for prior year tax attributes in conjunction withpositions is mainly due to reversal of an uncertain tax position recorded for the deemed,one-time mandatory repatriation provision of the Tax Reform Act. Act, following final regulations issued by the IRS in June 2019.

The $19.7$20.9 million addition for prior year tax positions in 2018 and the $51.3 million addition for current year tax positions in 2017, as well as the $49.2 million reduction for prior year tax positions in 2016 resulted2018 are all primarily fromdue to uncertainty associated with the devaluationenactment of the Egyptian Pound.Tax Reform Act and subsequent clarification issued by the IRS related to the positions in question.  

At December 31, 2017, $2.32019, $0.5 million, $51.3$91.1 million and $52.9$58.3 million of the net liability for uncertain tax positions were reflected in “Other assets,” “Deferred tax liability” and “Other liabilities,” respectively.respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2016, $2.12018, $1.2 million, $3.1$7.5 million and $35.0$75.3 million of the net liability for uncertain tax positions were reflected in “Other assets,” “Deferred tax liability” and “Other liabilities,” respectively.respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Of the net unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, all $101.9$148.8 million, $36.0$81.6 million and $49.4$101.9 million, respectively, would affect the effective tax rates if recognized.

At December 31, 2017,2019, the amount of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were $3.1was $4.0 million and $15.1$16.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2016,2018, the amount of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were $2.7was $3.2 million and $16.8$16.3 million, respectively.


We record interest related to accrued uncertain tax positions in interest expense and recognize penalties associated with uncertain tax positions in tax expense. Interest expense (benefit) recognized during the three years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 related to uncertain tax positions was $0.5$1.0 million, $(0.1)$0.1 million and $(4.8)$0.5 million, respectively. Penalties recognized during the three years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 related to uncertain tax positions were $0.3 million, $0.6 million and $(1.7) million, $(23.2) million and $2.3 million, respectively.

In several of the international locations in which we operate, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries enter into agreements with other of our wholly-owned subsidiaries to provide specialized services and equipment in support of our foreign operations. We apply a transfer pricing methodology to determine the amount to be charged for providing the services and equipment. In most cases, there are alternative transfer pricing methodologies that could be applied to these transactions and, if applied, could result in different chargeable amounts. Taxing authorities in the various foreign locations in which we operate could apply one of the alternative transfer pricing methodologies which could result in an increase to our income tax liabilities with respect to tax returns that remain subject to examination.

We expect the statute of limitations for the 20122013 through 2015 tax yearyears to expire in 20182020 for onevarious of our subsidiaries operating in Ireland, Malaysia and Mexico. We anticipate that the related unrecognized tax benefit will decrease by $1.5$5.1 million at that time.

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Tax Returns and Examinations.We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions and various foreign jurisdictions. Tax years that remain subject to examination by these jurisdictions include the year 2000 and the years 20062009 to 2016.2018. We are currently under audit in the United States, Australia, Brazil, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Malaysia, Mexico, Nicaragua, Norway, Qatar and the United Kingdom.Kingdom, or U.K. We do not anticipate that any adjustments resulting from the tax audit of any of these years will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

15. Employee Benefit Plans

16.Employee Benefit Plans

Defined Contribution Plans

We maintain defined contribution retirement plans for our U.S., U.K., and third-country national, or TCN, employees. The plan for our U.S. employees, or the 401k Plan, is designed to qualify under Section 401(k) of the Code. Under the 401k Plan, each participant may elect to defer taxation on a portion of his or her eligible earnings, as defined by the 401k Plan, by directing his or her employer to withhold a percentage of such earnings. A participating employee may also elect to makeafter-tax contributions to the 401k Plan. During 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, we matched 100% of the first 5%, 6% and 6%, respectively, of each employee’s qualifying annual compensation contributed to the 401k Plan. We ceased making discretionary profit sharing contributions to the 401k Plan on May 1, 2015. Prior to that date, we made discretionary profit sharing contributions equal to 4% of a participant’s defined compensation.pre-tax or Roth elective deferral basis in each respective year. Participants are fully vested in the employer match immediately upon enrollment in the 401k Plan and subject to a three-year cliff vesting period for any profit sharing contribution.Plan. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, our provision for contributions was $9.1 million, $8.0 million and $8.9 million, $12.9 million and $23.8 million, respectively.

The defined contribution retirement plan for our U.K. employees provides that we make annual contributions in an amount equal to the employee’semployee's contributions generally up to a maximum percentage of the employee’semployee's defined compensation per year. Our contribution during 20172019, 2018 and from July 1, 2016 to December 31, 20162017 for employees working in the U.K. sector of the North Sea was 6% of the employee’s defined compensation. During the first six months of 2016 and in 2015, our contribution was 10% of the employee’s defined compensation. Our provision for contributions was $1.4$2.1 million, $2.0$1.5 million and $3.4$1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.

The defined contribution retirement plan for our TCN employees, or International Savings Plan, is similar to the 401k Plan. During 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, we matched 5%, 6% and 6%, respectively, of each employee’s compensation contributed to the International Savings Plan. During the four months ended April 30, 2015, we made discretionary profit sharing contributions to the International Savings Plan equal to 4% of a participant’s defined compensation. We ceased making profit sharing contributions on May 1, 2015. Ourin each respective year, and our provision for contributions was $0.4 million $0.8 millionin each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and $2.2 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.2017.

Deferred Compensation and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

Our Amended and Restated Diamond Offshore Management Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, or Supplemental Plan, provides benefits to a select group of our management or other highly compensated employees to compensate such employees for any portion of ourthe applicable percentage of the base salary contribution and/or matching contribution under the 401k Plan that could not be contributed to that plan because of limitations within the Code. Our provision for contributions to the Supplemental Plan for 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 was approximately $136,000, $146,000$0.1 million in each respective year.

16. Segments and $153,000, respectively.Geographic Area Analysis

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

17.Segments and Geographic Area Analysis

Although we provide contract drilling services with different types of offshore drilling rigs and also provide such services in many geographic locations, we have aggregated these operations into one1 reportable segment based on the similarity of economic characteristics due to the nature of the revenue-earning process as it relates to the offshore drilling industry over the operating lives of our drilling rigs.

Revenues from contract drilling services by equipment-type are listed below:

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2017   2016   2015 
   (In thousands) 

Floaters:

      

Ultra-Deepwater

  $1,090,139   $989,158   $1,339,059 

Deepwater

   202,329    256,997    548,667 

Mid-Water

   137,607    248,846    387,549 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Floaters

   1,430,075    1,495,001    2,275,275 

Jack-ups

   21,144    30,213    84,909 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total contract drilling revenues

   1,451,219    1,525,214    2,360,184 

Revenues related to reimbursable expenses

   34,527    75,128    59,209 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

  $1,485,746   $1,600,342   $2,419,393 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Geographic Areas


Our drilling rigs are highly mobile and may be moved to other markets throughout the world in response to market conditions or customer needs. At December 31, 2017,2019, our actively-marketedactive drilling rigs were located offshore four3 countries in addition to the United States. Revenues by geographic area are presented by attributing revenues to the individual country or areas where the services were performed.

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2017   2016   2015 
   (In thousands) 

United States

  $630,595   $548,024   $513,605 

International:

      

South America

   348,479    434,956    812,271 

Australia/Asia

   307,925    234,182    415,033 

Europe

   177,603    344,964    532,824 

Mexico

   21,144    38,216    145,660 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   855,151    1,052,318    1,905,788 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

  $1,485,746   $1,600,342   $2,419,393 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)The following tables provide information about disaggregated revenue by equipment-type and country (in thousands):

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Total

Contract

Drilling

Revenues (1)

 

 

Revenues

Related to

Reimbursable

Expenses

 

 

Total

 

United States

 

$

507,759

 

 

$

7,881

 

 

$

515,640

 

Brazil

 

 

191,519

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

191,602

 

United Kingdom

 

 

149,724

 

 

 

14,036

 

 

 

163,760

 

Australia

 

 

85,932

 

 

 

23,710

 

 

 

109,642

 

Total

 

$

934,934

 

 

$

45,710

 

 

$

980,644

 

An individual international country may, from time to time, comprise a material percentage of our total contract drilling revenues from unaffiliated customers. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, individual countries that comprised 5% or more of our total contract drilling revenues from unaffiliated customers are listed below.

(1)

Contract drilling revenue for 2019 was entirely attributable to our floater rigs (drillships and semisubmersibles).

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

Floater Rigs

 

 

Jack-up

Rigs (1)

 

 

Total

Contract

Drilling

Revenues

 

 

Revenues

Related to

Reimbursable

Expenses

 

 

Total

 

    2017     2016     2015   

United States

 

$

628,574

 

 

$

8,413

 

 

$

636,987

 

 

$

7,436

 

 

$

644,423

 

Brazil

   18.9  18.0  23.1

 

 

170,839

 

 

 

 

 

 

170,839

 

 

 

(26

)

 

 

170,813

 

United Kingdom

   12.0  15.3  11.4

 

 

84,749

 

 

 

 

 

 

84,749

 

 

 

7,738

 

 

 

92,487

 

Australia

 

 

53,170

 

 

 

 

 

 

53,170

 

 

 

7,612

 

 

 

60,782

 

Malaysia

   11.2  1.7  6.8

 

 

114,228

 

 

 

 

 

 

114,228

 

 

 

(210

)

 

 

114,018

 

Australia

   9.5  12.8  7.0

Trinidad & Tobago

   4.6  9.2  9.8

Mexico

   1.4  2.4  6.0

Romania

      4.0  9.7

Other countries (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

692

 

 

 

692

 

Total

 

$

1,051,560

 

 

$

8,413

 

 

$

1,059,973

 

 

$

23,242

 

 

$

1,083,215

 

(1)

Loss-of-hire insurance proceeds related to early contract terminations for two jack-up rigs.

(2)

This represents countries that individually comprised less than 5% of total revenues.

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

Floater Rigs

 

 

Jack-up

Rigs

 

 

Total

Contract

Drilling

Revenues

 

 

Revenues

Related to

Reimbursable

Expenses

 

 

Total

 

United States

 

$

619,655

 

 

$

 

 

$

619,655

 

 

$

10,940

 

 

$

630,595

 

Brazil

 

 

280,798

 

 

 

 

 

 

280,798

 

 

 

(311

)

 

 

280,487

 

United Kingdom

 

 

171,146

 

 

 

 

 

 

171,146

 

 

 

6,424

 

 

 

177,570

 

Australia

 

 

125,568

 

 

 

 

 

 

125,568

 

 

 

15,385

 

 

 

140,953

 

Malaysia

 

 

164,984

 

 

 

 

 

 

164,984

 

 

 

1,988

 

 

 

166,972

 

Trinidad

 

 

67,924

 

 

 

 

 

 

67,924

 

 

 

 

 

 

67,924

 

Other countries (1)

 

 

 

 

 

21,144

 

 

 

21,144

 

 

 

101

 

 

 

21,245

 

Total

 

$

1,430,075

 

 

$

21,144

 

 

$

1,451,219

 

 

$

34,527

 

 

$

1,485,746

 

(1)

This represents countries that individually comprised less than 5% of total revenues.


The following table presents our long-lived tangible assets by geographic locationcountry as of December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015.2017. A substantial portion of our assets is comprised of rigs that are mobile, and therefore asset locations at the end of the period are not necessarily indicative of the geographic distribution of the earnings generated by such assets during the periods and may vary from period to period due to the relocation of rigs. In circumstances where our drilling rigs were in transit at the end of a calendar year, they have been presented in the tables below within the geographic areacountry in which they were expected to operate.operate (in thousands).

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018 (1)

 

 

2017 (1)

 

Drilling and other property and equipment, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

2,227,934

 

 

$

2,245,989

 

 

$

2,300,956

 

International:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United Kingdom

 

 

1,061,585

 

 

 

1,083,540

 

 

 

133,525

 

Brazil

 

 

883,607

 

 

 

923,355

 

 

 

923,398

 

Australia

 

 

570,964

 

 

 

242,929

 

 

 

629,436

 

Singapore

 

 

404,420

 

 

 

366,798

 

 

 

17

 

Malaysia

 

 

2,037

 

 

 

318,191

 

 

 

1,084,793

 

Other countries (2)

 

 

2,281

 

 

 

3,420

 

 

 

189,516

 

 

 

 

2,924,894

 

 

 

2,938,233

 

 

 

2,960,685

 

Total

 

$

5,152,828

 

 

$

5,184,222

 

 

$

5,261,641

 

 

   December 31, 
   2017 (1)   2016 (1)   2015 (1) 
   (In thousands) 

Drilling and other property and equipment, net:

      

United States

  $2,300,956   $2,753,511   $3,292,474 

International:

      

Australia/Asia/Middle East

   1,714,246    1,429,563    1,224,089 

South America

   923,398    1,030,069    1,051,283 

Europe/Africa

   320,473    380,462    664,520 

Mexico

   2,568    133,330    146,448 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2,960,685    2,973,424    3,086,340 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $5,261,641   $5,726,935   $6,378,814 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)

During 2017, 20162018 and 2015,2017, we recorded aggregate impairment losses of $99.3 million, $678.1$27.2 million and $860.4$99.3 million, respectively, to write down certain of our drilling rigs and related equipment with indicators of impairment to their estimated recoverable amounts.

(2)

This represents countries with long-lived assets that individually comprised less than 5% of total drilling and other property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation.

The following table presents the countries in which material concentrations of our long-lived tangible assets were located as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:

   December 31, 
       2017          2016          2015     

United States

   43.7  48.1  51.6

Malaysia

   20.6  13.6  10.4

Brazil

   17.5  16.8  15.3

Australia

   12.0  11.4  4.5

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, no other countries had more than a 5% concentration of our long-lived tangible assets.

Major Customers

Our customer base includes major and independent oil and gas companies and government-owned oil companies. Revenues from our major customers for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017 that contributed more than 10% of our total revenues are as follows:

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Customer

    2017     2016     2015   

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Anadarko

   24.9  22.4  12.4

Hess Corporation

 

 

28.9

%

 

 

25.0

%

 

 

16.0

%

Occidental (formerly Anadarko)

 

 

20.6

%

 

 

33.8

%

 

 

24.9

%

Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.

   18.9  17.9  24.1

 

 

19.5

%

 

 

15.8

%

 

 

18.9

%

Hess Corporation

   16.0  7.7  0.3

BP

   15.8  9.0  0.1

 

 

3.1

%

 

 

10.5

%

 

 

15.8

%

ExxonMobil

      5.8  12.4

 

18.Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data

17. Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data

Unaudited summarized financial data by quarter for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 is shown below.below (in thousands).

 

 

First

 

 

Second

 

 

Third

 

 

Fourth

 

  First
Quarter
   Second
Quarter
   Third
Quarter
   Fourth
Quarter
 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

 

Quarter

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

233,542

 

 

$

216,706

 

 

$

254,020

 

 

$

276,376

 

Operating loss

 

 

(49,127

)

 

 

(111,500

)

 

 

(72,834

)

 

 

(48,869

)

Loss before income tax expense

 

 

(77,390

)

 

 

(141,342

)

 

 

(102,610

)

 

 

(80,672

)

Net loss

 

 

(73,328

)

 

 

(113,988

)

 

 

(95,128

)

 

 

(74,770

)

Net loss per share, basic and diluted

 

$

(0.53

)

 

$

(0.83

)

 

$

(0.69

)

 

$

(0.54

)

  (In thousands, except per share data) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

        

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

  $374,226   $399,289   $366,023   $346,208 

 

$

295,510

 

 

$

268,861

 

 

$

286,322

 

 

$

232,522

 

Operating income (loss)(1)

   50,859    20,824    58,581    (6,385

Income (loss) before income tax expense

   24,462    (7,020   (3,801   (35,081

Operating income (loss)(2)(1)

 

 

512

 

 

 

(52,375

)

 

 

(23,043

)

 

 

(37,277

)

Loss before income tax expense

 

 

(25,142

)

 

 

(79,286

)

 

 

(55,894

)

 

 

(66,303

)

Net income (loss)

   23,539    15,949    10,799    (31,941

 

 

19,321

 

 

 

(69,274

)

 

 

(51,112

)

 

 

(79,207

)

Net income (loss) per share, basic and diluted

  $0.17   $0.12   $0.08   $(0.23

 

$

0.14

 

 

$

(0.50

)

 

$

(0.37

)

 

$

(0.58

)

2016

        

Revenues

  $470,543   $388,747   $349,178   $391,874 

Operating income (loss)(2)(1)

   111,569    (626,669   54,071    104,145 

Income (loss) before income tax expense

   83,196    (666,115   34,746    79,874 

Net income (loss)

   87,425    (589,937   13,927    116,082 

Net income (loss) per share, basic and diluted

  $0.64   $(4.30  $0.10   $0.85 

 

(1)During the second and fourth quarters of 2017, we recognized an aggregate impairment loss of $71.2 million and $28.0 million, respectively, to write down certain of our drilling rigs with indicators of impairment to their estimated recoverable amounts. See Notes 1 and 2.
(2)During the second quarter of 2016, we recognized an aggregate impairment loss of $678.1 million to write down certain of our drilling rigs and related spare parts with indicators of impairment to their estimated recoverable amounts. See Notes 1 and 2.

(1)During the second quarter of 2018, we recognized an impairment loss of $27.2 million to write down the carrying value of the Ocean Scepter to its estimated recoverable amount. See Note 3.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the federal securities laws, including this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us under the federal securities laws is accumulated and communicated to our management on a timely basis to allow decisions regarding required disclosure.


Our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, participated in an evaluation by our management of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) as of December 31, 2017.2019. Based on their participation in that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017.2019.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any control system, however well designed, including the possibility of human error or mistakes, faulty judgments in decision-making and the possible circumvention or overriding of controls. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Management must make judgments with respect to the relative cost and expected benefits of any specific control measure. The design of a control system also is based in part upon assumptions and judgments made by management about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that a control will be effective under all potential future conditions. As a result, even an effective system of internal controls can provide no more than reasonable assurance with respect to the fair presentation of financial statements and the processes under which they were prepared. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because ifof changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.2019. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) inInternal Control – Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment our management believes that, as of December 31, 2017,2019, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, the registered public accounting firm that audited our financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form10-K, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The attestation report of Deloitte & Touche LLP is included at the beginning of Item 8 of

this Form10-K.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the foregoing evaluation that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter of 20172019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

Not applicable.applicable.


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Information about our directors and persons nominated to become directors is contained under the caption “Election of Directors” in our Proxy Statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, or our 2018 Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.   Information about our executive officers is reported under the caption “Executive Officers“Information About Our Executive Officers” in Item 1 of the Registrant” in Part I of this Report.

Information about beneficial ownership reporting compliance is contained under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our 2018 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

We have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Our code can be found in the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.diamondoffshore.com and is available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy by writing to our Corporate Secretary at Diamond Offshore, Attention: Corporate Secretary, 15415 Katy Freeway, Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77094. We intend to post any changes to or waivers of our code for our directors or executive officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, on our website within the time period required by the SEC and the NYSE.

Information about the proceduresAdditional information required by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directorsthis item can be found in our 2018 Proxy Statement underfor our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the captions “Board Diversity and Director Nominating Process” and “Communications with Diamond Offshore and Others”SEC within 120 days after December 31, 2019 (the “2020 Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information about the composition of the Audit Committee and our Audit Committee financial experts is contained in our 2018 Proxy Statement under the caption “Board Committees – Audit Committee” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Information about Compensation Committee interlocks, director and executive officer compensation and the Compensation Committee Report is containedrequired by this item can be found in our 20182020 Proxy Statement under the captions “Compensation Committee — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Director Compensation,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Compensation Committee Report”  and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Information about securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans can be found under the caption “Stock-Based Compensation” under Item 4 of this Report and is contained in our 20182020 Proxy Statement under the caption “Equity Plan” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information about the number of shares of our common stock beneficially ownedAdditional information required by each director and named executive officer, by all directors and executive officers as a group and on each beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock is contained under the captions “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Security ownership of Management and Directors”this item can be found in our 20182020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information about certain relationships and related transactions and director independence is contained under the captions “Director Independence” and “Transactions with Related Persons”required by this item can be found in our 20182020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Information about our Audit Committee’spre-approval policy and procedures for audit and other services and information about our principal accountant fees and services is containedrequired by this item can be found in our 20182020 Proxy Statement under the caption “Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor — Audit Fees” and “— Auditor Engagement andPre-Approval Policy” and is incorporated herein by reference.


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

Item 15.

(a)

    Exhibits

Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules.Schedules

(a)    Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

 

 

(b)

Exhibits

Exhibit No.

Description

Exhibit No.

Description

3.1

    3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003) (SEC FileNo. 1-13926).

3.2

Amended and RestatedBy-laws (as amended through October  4, 2013)July 23, 2018) of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form8-K filed October 8, 2013)July 24, 2018).

    4.1

4.1*

Description of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

4.2

Indenture, dated as of February 4, 1997, between Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (successor to The Bank of New York Mellon which was previously known as The Bank of New York) (as successor to The Chase Manhattan Bank), as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001) (SEC FileNo. 1-13926).

    4.2

4.3

Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 8, 2009, between Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (successor to The Bank of New York Mellon), as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form8-K filed October 8, 2009) (SEC FileNo. 1-13926).

    4.3

4.4

Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 5, 2013, between Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (successor to The Bank of New York Mellon), as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form8-K filed November 5, 2013).

    4.4

4.5

Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 15, 2017, between Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Current Report on Form8-K filed August 16, 2017).


Exhibit No. 1-13926).

Description

10.3

Services Agreement, dated October 16, 1995, between Loews Corporation and Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001) (SEC FileNo. 1-13926).

 10.4+

Amended and Restated Diamond Offshore Management Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan effective as of January 1, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006) (SEC FileNo. 1-13926).

10.5+

Diamond Offshore Management Bonus Program, as amended and restated, and dated as of December 31, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997) (SEC FileNo. 1-13926).

10.6+

Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit B attached to our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed April 1, 2014)2014).

10.7+

Form of Stock Option Certificate for grants to executive officers, other employees and consultants pursuant to the Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form8-K filed October 1, 2004) (SEC FileNo. 1-13926).

10.8+

Form of Stock Option Certificate for grants tonon-employee directors pursuant to the Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form8-K filed October 1, 2004) (SEC FileNo. 1-13926).

10.9+

The Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers (as Amended and Restated as of March 28, 2014) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A attached to our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed April 1, 2014).

  10.10+Form of Award Certificate for stock appreciation right grants to the Company’s executive officers, other employees and consultants pursuant to the Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form8-K filed April 28, 2006) (SEC FileNo. 1-13926).

  10.11+

10.10+

Form of Award Certificate for stock appreciation right grants tonon-employee directors pursuant to the Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007) (SEC FileNo. 1-13926)2007).

  10.12+

10.11+

Form of Award Certificate for grants of Performance Restricted Stock Units under the Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly Report Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014)2014).

  10.13+

10.12+

Specimen Agreement for grants of restricted stock units to officers under the Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form8-K filed March 30, 2015)2015).

  10.14+

10.13+

Specimen Agreement for grants of restricted stock units to the Chief Executive Officer under the Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form8-K filed March 30, 2015)2015).

  10.15

10.14+

Specimen agreement for grants of restricted stock units to executive officers under the Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 14, 2018).

10.15+

Specimen agreement for grants of restricted stock units to the Chief Executive Officer under the Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 14, 2018).

10.16+

The Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2018, as amended June 28, 2018) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018).

10.17+

Specimen agreement for cash incentive awards to executive officers under the Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 14, 2018).  


Exhibit No.

Description

10.20

  10.16

Extension Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2013, among Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as an issuing bank, as swingline lender and as administrative agent for the lenders, and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013)2013).

  10.17

10.21

Commitment Increase and Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2014, among Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as an issuing bank, as swingline lender and as administrative agent for the lenders, and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014)2014).

  10.18

10.22

Commitment Increase and Extension Agreement and Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2014, among Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and swingline lender, the issuing banks named therein and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form8-K filed October 24, 2014)2014).

  10.19

10.23

Extension Agreement and Amendment No. 4 to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2015, among Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and swingline lender, the issuing banks named therein and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015)2015).

  10.20

10.24

Agreement and Amendment No. 5 to Credit Agreement, dated as of August 18, 2016, among Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and swingline lender, the issuing banks named therein and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016)2016).

  10.21+

10.25

SeveranceAmendment No. 6 and Consent to Credit Agreement and Successor Agency Agreement, dated Mayas of October 2, 2016, between2018, among Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., as borrower, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as successor administrative agent, the lenders party thereto and Kelly Youngbloodthe other parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.2 to our QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016) 8-K filed October 4, 2018).

  10.22+

10.26

5-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2018, among Diamond Offshore Executive Retention PlanDrilling, Inc., as the U.S. borrower, Diamond Foreign Asset Company, as the foreign borrower, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and swingline lender, the issuing banks named therein and the lenders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form8-K filed January 31, 2017)October 4, 2018).

  10.23+

  10.27+

Form ofExecutive Retention Agreement, underdated June 29, 2018, between Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and Ronald Woll (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 2, 2018).


Exhibit No.

Description

10.28+

Specimen Cash Incentive Award Agreement for executive officers under the Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2018, as amended on June 28, 2018) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 20, 2019).

10.29+

Specimen Cash Incentive Award Agreement for the Chief Executive RetentionOfficer under the Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2018, as amended on June 28, 2018) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form8-K filed January 31, 2017)March 20, 2019).

10.30+

Specimen Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for executive officers under the Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 20, 2019).

  12.1*

10.31+

Statement re Computation of Ratios.Specimen Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for the Chief Executive Officer under the Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 20, 2019).

21.1*

List of Subsidiaries of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.Inc.

23.1*

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.LLP.

  24.1*

24.1

Power of Attorney (set forth on the signature page hereof)of the Original Filing).

31.1*

Rule13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.Officer.

31.2*

Rule13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.Officer.

32.1*

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.Officer.

101.INS**

XBRL Instance Document.Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH**

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL**

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.LAB**

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE**

Inline XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF**

Inline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.

104*

The cover page of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, formatted in Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition.(included with the Exhibit 101 attachments).

 

*

Filed or furnished herewith.

**

The documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) and attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, are deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise, not subject to liability under these sections.

+

Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

Item 16.    Form10-K Summary.

None.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 13, 2018.14, 2020.

 

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.

By:

By:

/s/ SCOTT KORNBLAU

Scott Kornblau

Acting

Chief Financial Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Scott Kornblau and David L. Roland and each of them, as his or her true and lawfulattorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution andre-substitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all documents relating to this Annual Report on Form10-K, including any and all amendments and supplements thereto, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto saidattorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as fully as to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that saidattorneys-in-fact and agents or their or his or her substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

Title

Date

/s/    MARC EDWARDS        

Marc Edwards

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

February 13, 2018

/s/    SCOTT KORNBLAU        

Scott Kornblau

Vice President, Acting Chief Financial

Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)

February 13, 2018

/s/    BETH G. GORDON        

Beth G. Gordon

Vice President and Controller

(Principal Accounting Officer)

February 13, 2018

/s/    JAMES S. TISCH        

James S. Tisch

Chairman of the BoardFebruary 13, 2018

/s/    JOHN R. BOLTON        

John R. Bolton

DirectorFebruary 13, 2018

/s/    CHARLES L. FABRIKANT        

Charles L. Fabrikant

DirectorFebruary 13, 2018

/s/    PAUL G. GAFFNEY II        

Paul G. Gaffney II

DirectorFebruary 13, 2018

Signature

Title

Date

/s/    EDWARD GREBOW        

Edward Grebow

Director

February 13, 2018

/s/    HERBERT C. HOFMANN        

Herbert C. Hofmann

DirectorFebruary 13, 2018

/s/    KENNETH I. SIEGEL        

Kenneth I. Siegel

DirectorFebruary 13, 2018

/s/    CLIFFORD M. SOBEL        

Clifford M. Sobel

DirectorFebruary 13, 2018

/s/    ANDREW H. TISCH        

Andrew H. Tisch

DirectorFebruary 13, 2018

/s/    RAYMOND S. TROUBH        

Raymond S. Troubh

DirectorFebruary 13, 2018

 

9585