UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM10-K

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019

Commission file number:1-6615

 

SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

Delaware

 

Delaware

95-2594729

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

26600 Telegraph Road, Suite 400

Southfield, Michigan

48033

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code:(248)352-7300

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $0.01 par value

SUP

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of RegulationS-K (§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Act).    Yes      No  

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s $0.01 par value common equity held bynon-affiliates as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter was $486,960,608,$86,896,509, based on a closing price of $19.55.$3.46. On February 28, 2018,21, 2020, there were 24,917,02525,128,158 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s 20182020 Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the registrant’s fiscal year, are incorporated by reference into Part III of thisForm 10-K.

 

 

 



SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I

PAGE

PART I

Item 1

Business.

PAGE

1

Item 1

Business.

1
Item 1A

Risk Factors.Factors.

7

4

Item 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments.Comments.

20

14

Item 2

Properties.Properties.

20

14

Item 3

Legal Proceedings.Proceedings.

20

14

Item 4

Mine Safety Disclosures.Disclosures.

20

14

Item 4A

Information About Executive Officers of the Registrant..

21

14

PART II

Item 5

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.Securities.

23

17

Item 6

Selected Financial Data.Data.

25

18

Item 7

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.Operations.

27

19

Item 7A

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.Risk.

49

31

Item 8

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.Data.

52

32

Item 9

Changes in and Disagreements Withwith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.Disclosure.

103

71

Item 9A

Controls and Procedures.Procedures.

103

71

Item 9B

Other Information.Information.

104

71

PART III

Item 10

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.Governance.

105

72

Item 11

Executive Compensation.Compensation.

105

72

Item 12

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.Matters.

105

72

Item 13

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.Independence.

105

72

Item 14

Principal Accountant Fees and Services.Services.

105

72

PART IV

Item 15

Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedules.Schedules.

106

73

Schedule II

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.Accounts.

110

77

Item 16

Form 10-K Summary.

78

SIGNATURES


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. We have included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form10-K (including in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”) and from time to time our management may make statements that may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are based upon management’s current expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events and conditions and may discuss, among other things, anticipated future performance (including sales and earnings), expected growth, future business plans and costs and potential liability for environmental-related matters. Any statement that is not historical in nature is a forward-looking statement and may be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “will,” “will likely result,” “will continue,” “plans to”, “could”, “continue”, “approximately”, “forecast”, “estimates”, “pursue” and similar expressions. These statements include our belief regarding general automotive industry and market conditions and growth rates, as well as general domestic and international economic conditions.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of the company,Company, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements and from the company’sCompany’s historical results and experience. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, those described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and Part II - Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report on Form10-K and elsewhere in the Annual Report and those described from time to time in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Readers are cautioned that it is not possible to predict or identify all of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect future results and that the risks described herein should not be considered to be a complete list. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and the companyCompany undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.


ITEM 1 - BUSINESS

Description of Business and Industry

The principal business of Superior Industries International, Inc.’s (referred to herein as the “company”“Company,” “Superior,” or “we,” “us”“we” and “our”) principal business is the design and manufacture of aluminum wheels for sale to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”)(OEMs) in North America and Europe and aftermarket customers.distributors in Europe. We employ approximately 8,400 employees, operating in eight manufacturing facilities in North America and Europe with a combined annual manufacturing capacity of approximately 20 million wheels. We are one of the largest suppliers to global OEMs and we believe we are the #1 North AmericanEuropean aluminum wheel supplier, the #3 European OEM supplieraftermarket manufacturer and #1 European aftermarket supplier. Our OEM aluminum wheels accounted for approximately 92 percent of our sales in 2019 and are primarily sold for factory installation as either standard equipment or optional equipment, on approximately 180 vehicle models manufactured by Audi, BMW Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. (“FCA”)(including Mini), Daimler AG Company (Mercedes-Benz, AMG, Smart), FCA, Ford, General Motors (“GM”),GM, Honda, Jaguar-Land Rover,Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Mazda, Nissan, PSA, Renault, Subaru, Tesla,Suzuki, Toyota, VolkswagenVW Group (Volkswagen, Audi, SEAT, Skoda, Porsche, Bentley) and Volvo. We also sell aluminum wheels to the European aftermarket under the brands ATS, RIAL, ALUTEC and ANZIO. North America and Europe represent the principal markets for our products, but we have a global presence and opportunities withdiversified customer base consisting of North American, European and Asian OEMs. The following chart below included twelve months of proforma sales forWe continue to deliver on our European operations for informational purposes. Allstrategic plan to be one of the other charts in this document include seven months of sales forleading light vehicle aluminum wheel suppliers globally, delivering innovative wheel solutions to our European operations, which aligns with the acquisition date. On May 30, 2017, we acquired a majority interest in Uniwheels AG (“Uniwheels”), which is also referred to as our “European operations.”customers.

CUSTOMER SALES PERCENTAGES FOR 2016 AND 2017 ASSUMING 12 MONTHS OF UNIWHEELS

With the acquisition of our European operations in 2017, we diversified our customer base from predominately North American to include Europe and North America. The following chart demonstrates the shift in diversification of our business from 2016 to 2017.

DIVERSIFICATION

Uniwheels is a European supplier of OEM aluminum wheels and also a supplier of European aftermarket aluminum wheels. As a result of the acquisition, we have expanded into the European market, broadened our product portfolio and acquired a significant customer share with European OEMs, including Audi, Jaguar-Land Rover, Mercedes Benz and Volvo. The acquisition is not only complementary in terms of customers, market coverage and product offerings but also very much aligned with our strategic direction with a focus on larger diameter wheels, premium finishes, luxury brands and specialty wheels for high performance motorsport racing vehicles, all providing enhanced opportunity for higher value added business. With the acquisition, ourOur global reach encompasses sales to nine of the ten largest OEMs in the world with sales surpassing $1.1 billion.world. The following charts show key highlights of 2017 andchart shows our sales by major customer based on seven months of Uniwheels. The chart includes net income from operationsfor the years ended December 31, 2019 and Adjusted EBITDA, which is a key metric we use to measure operating performance but is not calculated according to GAAP.2018.

 

SALES BY CUSTOMER AND PROFITABILITY

 

*  Income from operations in 2017 includes$44.3 million in costs related to acquisition costs and integration costs.

*  See the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section of this annual report for a reconciliation of our Adjusted EBIDA to income from operations.

Historically, the focus of the Company was on providing wheels for relatively high-volume programs with lower degrees of competitive differentiation. In order to improve our strategic position and better serve our customers, we are augmenting our product portfolio with wheels containing higher technical content and greater differentiation. We believe this direction is consistent with current trends in the market and needs of our customers. To achieve this objective, we have invested and continue to invest in new manufacturing capabilities in order to produce more sophisticated finishes and larger diameter products, which typically provide higher value in the market. The acquisition of our European operations and the construction of a new finishing facility align with this strategic mission. We have constructed a physical vapor deposition (“PVD”) finishing facility, which we believe will establish us as the first OEM automotive wheel manufacturer to have this capabilityin-house in North America and Europe. PVD is a wheel coating process that creates bright chrome-like surfaces in an environmentally friendly manner.

Demand for our products is mainly driven by light-vehicle production levels in North America and Europe. TheEurope, as well as production levels at our key customers and take rates on programs we serve. North American light-vehicle production level in 20172019 was 16.3 million vehicles, as compared to 17.0 million vehicles a 4.7 percent decrease from 2016. Despite this decrease, the 2017 North American production level was one of the highest in the history of the industry.2018. In Europe, the passenger car and light duty truck vehicle production level in 20172019 was 18.717.7 million vehicles, a 0.3 percent increase over 2016. We track annual production rates based on information fromWard’s Automotive Group,as well as other sources.compared to 18.5 million vehicles in 2018. The majority of our customers’ wheel programs are awarded two to suppliers two or threefour years in advance. Our purchase orders with OEMs are typically specific to a particular vehicle model.

Raw Materials

The raw materials used in manufacturing our products are readily available and are obtained through numerous suppliers with whom we have established trade relations. Purchased aluminum accounted for the vast majority of

our total raw material requirements during 2017. Our aluminum requirements are met through purchase orders with major producers, with physical supply primarily obtained fromin-country production locations. Generally, aluminum purchase orders are fixed as to minimum and maximum quantities, which the producers must supply and we must purchase during the term of the orders. During 2017, we were able to successfully secure aluminum commitments from our primary suppliers to meet production requirements, and we anticipate being able to source aluminum requirements to meet our expected level of production in 2018. We procure other raw materials through numerous suppliers with whom we have established trade relationships. We also enter into commodity forward contracts and swaps covering up to twelve months aftermarket production volume in which the aluminum price is linked to the London Metal Exchange (LME) index. Moreover, in both our North American and European businesses, OEM wheel sale prices are adjusted for fluctuating aluminum commodity prices based on changes in commodity indices.

When market conditions warrant, we may also enter into purchase commitments to secure the supply of certain commodities used in the manufacture of our products, such as aluminum, natural gas and other raw materials.

Customer Dependence

We have proven our ability to be a consistent producer of high quality aluminum wheels with the capability to meet our customers’ price, quality, delivery and service requirements. We continually strive to continually enhance our relationships with our customers through continuous improvement programs, not only through our manufacturing operations but in the engineering, design, development and quality areas as well. These key business relationships have resulted in multiple vehicle supply contract awards with our key customers in the past few years.

GM, Ford and GMVW Group were our only customers individually accounting for more than 10 percent or more of our consolidated trade sales in 2017.2019. Net sales to these customers as well as Toyota, in 2017, 20162019 and 20152018 were as follows (dollars in millions):

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

 

  2015   2016   2017 

 

Percent of

Net Sales

 

 

Dollars

 

 

Percent of

Net Sales

 

 

Dollars

 

 

 

  Percent of
Net Sales
 Dollars   Percent of
Net Sales
 Dollars   Percent of
Net Sales
 Dollars 

GM

 

22%

 

 

$

295.0

 

 

18%

 

 

$

272.6

 

 

 

Ford

   44 $315.1    38 $271.4    22 $248.8 

 

15%

 

 

$

208.1

 

 

18%

 

 

$

265.3

 

 

 

GM

   24 $175.6    30 $216.4    20 $217.5 

Toyota

   14 $104.5    14 $98.4    9 $103.8 

VW Group

 

13%

 

 

$

180.1

 

 

12%

 

 

$

183.9

 

 

 


In addition, sales to NissanDaimler AG Company, BMW, Toyota and Volkswagen Group (“VW”), which includes Audi, exceededVolvo exceed 5 percent of sales during 2017,in 2019 and sales to Mercedes and Volvo for the seven months following the acquisition of Uniwheels exceeded 5 percent during 2017 on an annualized basis.2018. The loss of all or a substantial portion of our sales to Ford, GM, Toyota, Nissan, VW, Mercedes these customers, and/or Volvothose listed in the table above, would have a significant adverse effect on our financial results. See alsoRefer to Item 1A, “Risk Factors”Factors,” of this Annual Report.

Raw Materials

The raw materials used in manufacturing our products are readily available and are obtained through numerous suppliers with whom we have established trade relationships. Aluminum accounted for the vast majority of our total raw material requirements during 2019. Our aluminum requirements are met through purchase orders with major global producers. During 2019, we successfully secured aluminum commitments from our primary suppliers sufficient to meet our production requirements, and we anticipate being able to source aluminum requirements to meet our expected level of production in 2020.

When market conditions warrant, we may also enter into purchase commitments to secure the supply of certain other commodities used in the manufacture of our products, such as natural gas, electricity and other raw materials.

We establish price adjustment clauses with our OEM customers to minimize the aluminum price risk. In the aftermarket, we use hedging products to secure our aluminum purchase prices.

Foreign Operations

We manufacture a significant portionthe majority of our North American products in Mexico that are sold bothfor sale in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Net sales of wheels manufactured in our Mexico operations in 20172019 totaled $608.0$599.8 million and represented 83.085.2 percent of our total net sales in North America. We anticipate that the portion of our products produced in Mexico versus the United States will remain comparableAmerica as compared to $673.2 million and 84.1 percent in 2018. Net property, plant and equipment used in our operations in Mexico totaled $214.5$223.2 million at December 31, 2017.2019 and $221.5 million at December 31, 2018. The overall cost for us to manufacture wheels in Mexico is currently is lower than in the United States, due to lower labor costs as a result of lower prevailing wage rates.

Similarly, we manufacture the majority of our products for the European market in Poland, which are soldfor sale throughout Europe. NetFor the year ended December 31, 2019, net sales of wheels manufactured in our Poland operations for the seven months following

the acquisition were $220.4$422.4 million and represented 58.763.2 percent of our total net European sales, as compared to $421.8 million and 60.1 percent in Europe in 2017.2018. Net property, plant and equipment used in our operations in Poland totaled $227.3$217.6 million at December 31, 2017.2019 and $221.0 million at December 31, 2018. Similar to our Mexican operations, the overall cost to manufacture wheels in Poland is substantially lower than in both the United States and Germany at the present time due principally to lower labor costs.

Cost of manufacturing our product in Mexico, Germany and Poland may be affected by changes in cost structures, tariffs imposed by the United States, trade protection laws, policies and other regulations affecting trade and investments, social, political, labor, or general economic conditions. Other factors that can affect the business and financial results of our Mexican, German, Polish and U.S. operations include, but are not limited to, currency effects of the Peso, Euro and Zloty currencies, availability and competency of personnel and tax regulations. See also Item 1A, “Risk Factors - Our international operations and international trade agreements make us vulnerable to risks associated with doing business in foreign countries that can affect our business, financial condition and results of operations” and Item 1A, “Risk Factors - Fluctuations in foreign currencies may adversely impact our financial condition.”

Net Sales Backlog

Our customers typically award programs severaltwo to four years before actual production is scheduled to begin. Each year, the automotive manufacturers introduce new models, update existing models and discontinue certain models. In this process, we may be selected as the supplier on a new model, we may continue as the supplier on an updated model or we may lose a new or updated model to a competitor. The Company’sOur estimated net sales may be impacted by various assumptions, including new program vehicle production levels, customer price reductions, currency exchange rates and program launch timing. Our customers may terminate the awarded programs or reduce order levels at any time, based on market conditions or reduce order levels.change in portfolio direction. Therefore, expected net sales information does not represent firm commitments or firm orders. We estimate that we have been awarded programs covering approximately 8990 percent of our manufacturing capacity over the next three years.

Competition

Competition in the market for aluminum wheels is based primarily on delivery, overall customer service, price, quality and technology. We are the largest producer of aluminum wheels for OEM installations in North America and one of the largest in Europe. We currently supply approximately 2017 percent and 1413 percent of the aluminum wheels installed on passenger cars and light-duty trucks in North America and Europe, respectively.

Competition is global in nature with a significant volume of exports from Asia into North America. There are several competitors with facilities in North America but we estimate that we have more than twice the North American production capacity of any competitor. Some of the key competitors in North America include Central Motor Wheel of America, (“CMWA”), CITIC Dicastal Co., Ltd., Prime Wheel Corporation, Enkei, Hands Corporation, and Ronal. In 2017, the European Union renewed a tariff on aluminum wheels from China, which lessens the competitive pressures from Chinese competitors in that market. Key European competitors include Ronal, (Switzerland), Borbet, (Germany)Maxion and CMS (Turkey). The accessories market, by contrast, is heavily fragmented.CMS. We are the leading manufacturer of alloy wheels in the European aftermarket.aftermarket, where the competition is highly fragmented. Key competitors include Alcar, (Austria), Brock, (Germany), Borbet, (Germany), ATU (Germany) and Mak (Italy). See alsoMak. Refer to Item 1A, “Risk Factors”Factors,” of this Annual Report.

Steel and other types of wheels also compete with our products. According toWard’s Automotive Group, the aluminum wheel penetration rate on passenger cars and light-duty trucks in North America was 87approximately 88 percent for the 20172019 and 2018 model year and 81 percent

2


year. Although similar industry data is not available for the 2016 model year, compared to 79 percent for the 2015 model year. TheEurope, we estimate aluminum wheel penetration rate on passenger cars and light-duty trucks in Europe was 70 percent in 2017. We expect the aluminum wheel penetration ratecontinues to continuemarginally increase year-over-year with further opportunity to increase. However, severalSeveral factors can affect this rate including price, fuel economy requirements and styling preference.preferences. Although aluminum wheels currently arecost more costly than steel, aluminum is a lighter material than steel, which is desirable for fuel efficiency and generally viewed as aesthetically superior to steel and, thus, more desirable to the OEMs and their customers.

Research and Development

Our policy is to continuously review, improve and develop our engineering capabilities to satisfy our customer requirements in the most efficient and cost-effective manner available. We strive to achieve this objective by attracting and retaining top engineering talent and by maintaining the lateststate-of-the-art computer technology to support engineering development. Fully developed engineering centers located in Fayetteville, Arkansas, and in Lüdenscheid, Germany support our research and development manufacturing needs.development. We also have a technical sales function at our corporate headquarters in Southfield, Michigan that maintains a complement of engineering staff located near some of our largest customers’ headquarters and engineering and purchasing offices.

Research and development costs (primarily engineering and related costs), which Aftermarket wheels are expensed as incurred, are includeddeveloped in cost of sales in our consolidated income statements. Research and development costs during each of the last three years were $7.7 million in 2017, $3.8 million in 2016 and $2.6 million in 2015.Bad Dürkheim.

Government Regulation

Safety standards in the manufacture of vehicles and automotive equipment have been established under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, as amended. We believe that we are in compliance with all federal standards currently applicable to OEM suppliers and to automotive manufacturers.

Environmental Compliance

Our manufacturing facilities, like most other manufacturing companies, are subject to solid waste, water and air pollution control standards mandated by federal, state and local laws. Violators of these laws are subject to fines and, in extreme cases, plant closure. We believe our facilities are in material compliance with all presently applicable standards. However, costs related to environmental protection may grow due to increasingly stringent laws and regulations. The cost of environmental compliance was approximately $0.7 million in 2019 and 2018 and $0.6 million in 2017, $0.4 million in 2016 and $0.7 million in 2015.2017. We expect that future environmental compliance expenditures will approximate these levels and will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, climate change legislation or regulations restricting emission of “greenhouse gases” could result in increased operating costs and reduced demand for the vehicles that use our products. See alsoRefer to Item 1A, “Risk Factors - We are subject to various environmental laws” of this Annual Report.

In response to climate change, the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions is on the agenda of the European authorities. As a result, the EU has made a commitment in an EU Directive to reduce emissions by at least 20 percent by the year 2020 (measured on 1990 levels). Passenger cars have been identified as a key causal factor in emissions. A central element of the regulation is an average CO2 emissions target of 95g CO2 / km per new car registration. From 2025 this target has been further tightened to an average of between 68 and 78g CO2 / km. This value should be reached by means of improvements to engine technology and innovative technologies in terms of weight reduction.

Employees

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we hademployed approximately 7,8008,000 full-time employees and 350400 contract employees, compared to 4,189 full-timewith 4,800 employees in North America and 682 contract3,600 employees at December 31, 2016.in Europe. None of our employees in North America are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Uniwheels’Superior Industries Europe AG’s (“SEAG’s”) subsidiary, UniwheelsSuperior Industries Production (Germany)Germany GmbH (“UPG”SPG”), is a member of the employers’ association for the metal and electronic industry in North Rhine-Westphalia (METALL NRW Verband der Metalle.V. (Metall und Elektro-Industrie  North Rhine-WestphaliaNORDRHEIN-WESTPFALEN e.V.) and is subject to various collective bargaining agreements for the metal and electronic industry in North Rhine-Westphalia entered into by the employers’ association with the trade union IG Metall. These collective bargaining agreements include provisions relating to wages, holidays,holiday, and partial retirement. It is estimated that approximately 410200 employees of UniwheelsSEAG employed at UPGSPG in Germany were unionized

and/or and 437 employees were subject to collective bargaining agreements in 2017. UPG2019. SPG and UniwheelsSuperior Industries Automotive (Germany)Germany GmbH (operating a joint workers council) operate a statutory workers councilworkers’ councils and UniwheelsSuperior Industries Production (Poland) Sp. z o.o. (“UPP”) operates a voluntary workersworkers’ council. The increase in employees in 2017 was due to the acquisition of the Uniwheels business in Europe. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations.”

Fiscal Year End

Fiscal year 2019 and 2018 started on January 1 and ended December 31. The fiscal year offor 2017 consisted of the53-week period ended December 31, 2017 and the 2016 and 20152017. Thus, fiscal years consisted2019 and 2018 reflect one less calendar week of the52-week periods ended on December 25, 2016 and December 27, 2015, respectively.North America operations than fiscal year 2017. Historically our fiscal year ended on the last Sunday of the calendar year. Uniwheels,While our European operation acquired on May 30, 2017, isoperations historically reported on a calendar year end. Theseend, these fiscal periods alignaligned as of December 31, 2017. Beginning in 2018, both our North American and European operations will beare on a calendar fiscal year with each month ending on the last day of the calendar month. For convenience of presentation, all fiscal years are referred to as beginning as of January 1, and ending as of December 31, but actually reflect our financial position and results of operations for the periods described above.

Segment Information

As a result of the Uniwheels acquisition, the company expanded into the European market and extended its customer base to include the principal European OEMs. As a consequence, weWe have realignedaligned our executive management structure, organization and operations to focus on our performance in our North American and European regions. Accordingly, we have concluded that our North American and European businesses represent separate operating segments in view of significantly different markets and customers within each of these regions. Financial information about our operating segments is contained in Note 6, “Business Segments” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.

3


Seasonal Variations

The automotive industry is cyclical and varies based on the timing of consumer purchases of vehicles, which in turn varies based on a variety of factors such as general economic conditions, availability of consumer credit, interest rates and fuel costs. While there have been no significant seasonal variations in the past few years, production schedules in our industry can vary significantly from quarter to quarter to meet the scheduling demands of our customers. Typically, our aftermarket business experiences two seasonal peaks, which require substantially higher levels of production. The higher demand for aftermarket wheels from our customers occurs in March and SeptemberOctober leading into the spring and winter peak consumer selling seasons.

History

We were initially incorporated in Delaware in 1969. Our entry into the OEM aluminum wheel business in 1973 resulted from our successful development of manufacturing technology, quality control and quality assurance techniques that enabled us to satisfy the quality and volume requirements of the OEM market for aluminum wheels. The first aluminum wheel for a domestic OEM customer was a Mustang wheel for Ford Motor Company.Ford. We reincorporated in California in 1994, and in 2015, we moved our headquarters from Van Nuys, California to Southfield, Michigan and reincorporated in Delaware. On May 30, 2017, we acquired a majority interest in Uniwheels AG, which iswas a European supplier of OEM and aftermarket aluminum wheels. Uniwheels AG was renamed in 2018 to Superior Industries Europe AG. Our stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SUP.”

Available Information

Our Annual Report on Form10-K, quarterly reports on Form10-Q and any amendments thereto are available, without charge, on or through our website, www.supind.com, under “Investors,“Investor Relations,” as soon as reasonably

practicable after they are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The public may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website, www.sec.gov, which contains these reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding the company. Also included on our website, www.supind.com, under “Investor Relations,” is our Code of Conduct, which, among others, applies to our Chief Executive Officer, (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer. Copies of all SEC filings and our Code of Conduct are also available, without charge, upon request from Superior Industries International, Inc., Shareholder Relations, 26600 Telegraph Road, Suite 400, Southfield, Michigan 48033.

The SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information related to issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The content on any website referred to in this Annual Report on Form10-K is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form10-K.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

The following discussion of risk factors contains “forward-looking” statements, which may be important to understanding any statement in this Annual Report or elsewhere. The following information should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”)” and Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.

Our business routinely encounters and addresses risks and uncertainties. Our business, results of operations, and financial condition and cash flows could be materially adversely affected by the factors described below. Discussion about the important operational risks that our business encounters can also be found in the MD&A section and in the business description in Item 1, “Business” of this Annual Report. Below, we have described our present view of the most significant risks and uncertainties we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently do not consider significant, could also potentially impair our business, results of operations, financial condition and financial condition.cash flows. Our reactions to these risks and uncertainties as well as our competitors’ and customers’ reactions will affect our future operating results.

Risks Relating to Our Company4


Efforts to integrate our Europe segment, including substantial integration expenses and the additional indebtedness incurred to finance our acquisition of Uniwheels, could disrupt our business and adversely impact our stock price and future business and results of operations.

Since the acquisition of Uniwheels (now referred to as our “Europe segment,” “Europe business” or “Europe operations”) on May 30, 2017 (the “Acquisition”), we have made significant strides toward integrating the two companies. However, the continuing integration of our Europe segment with our North America segment will be a complex and time-consuming process that may not be successful. The company has a limited history of integrating a significant acquisition into its business and the integration process may produce unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. The primary areas of focus for successfully combining our Europe segment with our North American operations may include, among others: retaining and integrating management and other key employees; realizing overall improvement in the design, engineering,start-up and production of wheel programs; aligning customer interface across the combined business; integrating information, communications and other systems; and managing the growth of the combined company. Our integration efforts could disrupt our business in the following ways, among others, and any of the following could adversely affect our business, harm our financial condition, results of operations or business prospects:

the attention of management may be directed toward the completion of the integration and other transaction-related considerations and may be diverted from theday-to-day business operations of Superior, and matters related to the Acquisition may require commitments of time and resources that could otherwise have been devoted to other opportunities that might have been beneficial to us;

our employees may experience uncertainty regarding their future roles in the combined company, which might adversely affect our ability to retain, recruit and motivate key personnel; and

customers, suppliers and other third parties with business relationships with Superior may decide not to renew or may decide to seek to terminate, change and/or renegotiate their relationships with Superior as a result of the Acquisition, whether pursuant to the terms of their existing agreements with Superior or otherwise.

There are a large number of processes, policies, procedures, operations, technologies and systems that must be integrated with the rest of our operations, including purchasing, accounting and finance, sales, billing, payroll, manufacturing, marketing and employee benefits. While we expect to incur integration and restructuring costs and other transaction-related costs following completion of the Acquisition that currently are estimated to range between $5.0 million and $7.0 million, many of the expenses that will be incurred, especially with respect to manufacturing operations are, by their nature, difficult to estimate accurately. These expenses could, particularly in the near term, exceed the savings that we expect to achieve from elimination of duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale and cost savings. Although we expect that the realization of efficiencies related to the integration of the businesses will offset incremental transaction, Acquisition-related and restructuring costs over time, we cannot give any assurance that this net benefit will be achieved in the near term, or at all.

Even if we successfully integrate our Europe segment with our North American operations, there can be no assurance that we will realize the anticipated benefits. The Acquisition is expected to result in various benefits for the combined company including, among others, business growth opportunities and synergies in operations, purchasing and administration. Increased competition and/or deterioration in business conditions may limit our ability to expand this business. As such, we may not be able to realize the synergies, business opportunities and growth prospects anticipated in connection with the Acquisition.

The automotive industry is cyclical and volatility in the automotive industry could adversely affect our financial performance.

The majority ofPredominantly, our sales are made into the European and domestic U.S. automotive markets. Therefore, our financial performance depends largely on conditions in the European and U.S. automotive industry, which in turn can be affected significantly by broad economic and financial market conditions. Consumer demand for automobiles is subject to considerable volatility as a result of consumer confidence in general economic conditions, levels of employment, prevailing wages, fuel prices and the availability and cost of consumer credit. There can be no guarantee that the improvements in recent years will be sustained or that reductions from current production levels will not occur in future periods.credit, as well as changing consumer preferences. Demand for aluminum wheels can be further affected by other factors, including pricing and performance comparisons to competitive materials such as steel. Finally, the demand for our products is influenced by shifts of market share between vehicle manufacturers and the specific market penetration of individual vehicle platforms being sold by our customers. Decreases in demand for automobiles in Europe and the United States could adversely affect the valuation of our productive assets, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

A limited number of customers represent a large percentage of our sales. The loss of a significant customer or decrease in demand could adversely affect our operating results.

Ford, GM, Toyota, VW Group and Toyota,BMW, together, represented 8260 percent in 2019 and 64 percent of our sales in 2016 and just more than half of our total consolidated combined sales in 2017. Despite the decrease in the combined percentage of our three largest customers in 2017, a loss of a significant customer or decrease in demand still remains a risk.2018. Our OEM customers are not required to purchase any minimum amount of products from us. Increasingly global procurement practices, the pace of new vehicle introduction and demand for price reductions may make it more difficult to maintain long-term supply arrangements with our customers, and there are no guarantees that we will be able to negotiate supply arrangements with our customers on terms acceptable to us in the future. The contracts we have entered into with most of our customers provide that we will manufacture wheels for a particular vehicle model, rather than manufacture a specific quantity of products. Such contracts range from one

year to the life of the model (usually three to five years), typically arenon-exclusive and do not require the purchase by the customer of any minimum number of wheels from us. Therefore, a significant decrease in consumer demand for certain key models or group of related models sold by any of our major customers, or a decision by a manufacturer not to purchase from us, or to discontinue purchasing from us, for a particular model or group of models, could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and financial condition.cash flows.

We operate in a highly competitive industry.industry and efforts by our competitors to gain market share could adversely affect our financial performance.  

The global automotive component supply industry is highly competitive, both domestically and internationally.competitive. Competition is based on a number of factors, including price, technology, quality, delivery, and overall customer service, price, quality, technology and available capacity to meet customer demands. Some of our competitors are companies, or divisions or subsidiaries of companies, which are larger and have greater financial and other resources than we do. We cannot ensure that our products will be able to compete successfully with the products of these competitors. In particular, our ability to increase manufacturing capacity typically requires significant investments in facilities, equipment and personnel. OurThe majority of our operating facilities are at full or near to full capacity levels which may cause us to incur labor costs at premium rates in order to meet customer requirements, experience increased maintenance expenses or require us to replace our machinery and equipment on an accelerated basis. Furthermore, the nature of the markets in which we compete has attracted new entrants, particularly from low costlow-cost countries. As a result, our sales levels and margins continue to be adversely affected by pricing pressures reflective of significant competition from producers located inlow-cost foreign markets, such as China. Such competition with lower cost structures poses a significant threat to our ability to compete internationally and domestically. These factors have led to our customers awarding business to foreign competitors in the past, and they may continue to do so in the future. In addition, any of our competitors may foresee the course of market development more accurately, develop products that are superior to our products, have the ability to produce similar products at a lower cost or adapt more quickly to new technologies or evolving customer requirements. Consequently, our products may not be able to compete successfully with competitors’ products.

We experience continual pressure to reduce costs.

The global vehicle market is highly competitive at the OEM level, which drives continual cost-cutting initiatives by our customers. Customer concentration, relative supplier fragmentation and product commoditization have translated into continual pressure from OEMs to reduce the price of our products. It is possible that pricing pressures beyond our expectations could intensify as OEMs pursue restructuring and cost-cutting initiatives. If we are unable to generate sufficient production cost savings in the future to offset such price reductions, our gross margin rate of profitability and cash flows could be adversely affected. In addition, changes in OEMs’ purchasing policies or payment practices could have an adverse effect on our business. Our OEM customers typically attempt to qualify more than one wheel supplier for the programs we participate inon and for programs we may bid on in the future. As such, our OEM customers are able to negotiate favorable pricing or may decrease wheel orders.orders from us. Such actions may result in decreased sales volumes and unit price reductions for our company,the Company, resulting in lower revenues, gross profit, operating income and cash flows.

5


We may be unable to successfully implement cost-saving measures or achieve expected benefits under our plans to improve operations.

As part of our ongoing focus to provide high quality products, we continually analyze our business to further improve our operations and identify cost-cutting measures. We may be unable to successfully identify or implement plans targeting these initiatives or fail to realize the benefits of the plans we have already implemented, as a result of operational difficulties, a weakening of the economy or other factors. Cost reductions may not fully offset decreases in the prices of our products due to the time required to develop and implement cost reduction initiatives. Additional factors such as inconsistent customer ordering patterns, increasing product complexity and heightened quality standards are making it increasingly more difficult to reduce our costs. It is possible that asthe costs we incur costs to implement improvement strategies themay negatively impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flow may be negative.

flow.

Interruption in our production capabilities could result in increased freight costs or contract cancellations.

In the last six months of 2016, we experienced significant operating inefficiencies primarily in one of our manufacturing facilities. The inefficiencies stemmed from a variety of issues that reduced production rates. Contributing factors to the inefficiencies included an electricity outage and unanticipated equipment reliability issues which reduced finished goods andwork-in-process inventories. We also experienced several new product launches and significantramp-up in demand for newer products for which unusually high scrap rates were occurring. Lower than normal production yields coupled with the loss of inventory safety stock resulted in a series of expedited shipments to customers. The higher than normal costs included approximately $13 million in freight expediting costs and additional costs related to the production inefficiencies. In 2017, we were able to reduce the expedited shipping costs to less than $1 million and have made strides toward improving the production inefficiencies at this plant. However, headcount at this plant remained at elevated levels in 2017 to ensure we could meet new product launches, better serve our customers and avoid expedited shipping charges.

An interruption in production capabilities at any of our facilities as a result of equipment failure, interruption of raw materials or other supplies, labor disputes or other reasons could result in our inability to produce our products, which would reduce our sales and operating results for the affected period and harm our customer relationships. We have, from time to time, undertaken significantre-tooling and modernization initiatives at our facilities, which in the past have caused, and in the future may cause, unexpected delays and plant underutilization, and such adverse consequences may continue to occur as we continue to modernize our production facilities. In addition, we generally deliver our products only after receiving the order from the customer and thus typically do not hold large inventories. In the event of a production interruption at any of our manufacturing facilities, even if only temporary, or if we experience delays as a result of events that are beyond our control, delivery times to our customers could be severely affected. Any significant delay in deliveries to our customers could lead to premium freight costs and other performance penalties, as well as contract cancellations, and cause us to lose future sales and expose us to other claims for damages. Our manufacturing facilities are also subject to the risk of catastrophic loss due to unanticipated events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions or violent weather conditions. We have in the past, and may in the future, experience plant shutdowns or periods of reduced production which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Similarly, it also is possible that our customers may experience production delays or disruptions for a variety of reasons, which could include supply-chain disruption for parts other than wheels, equipment breakdowns or other events affecting vehicle assembly rates that impact us, work stoppages or slow-downs at factories where our products are consumed, or even catastrophic events such as fires, disruptive weather conditions or natural disasters. Such disruptions at the customer level may cause the affected customer to halt or limit the purchase of our products.

We may be unable to successfully launch new products and/or achieve technological advances.

In order to compete effectively compete in the global automotive component supply industry, we must be able to launch new products and adopt technology to meet our customers’ demands in a timely manner. However, we cannot ensure that we will be able to install and certify the equipment needed for new product programs in time for the start of production, or that the transitioning of our manufacturing facilities and resources under new product programs will not impact production rates or other operational efficiency measures at our facilities. In addition, we cannot ensure that our customers will execute the launch of their new product programs on schedule. We are also subject to the risks generally associated with new product introductions and applications, including lack of market acceptance, delays in product development and failure of products to operate properly. Further, changes in competitive technologies may render certainThe global automotive industry is experiencing a period of significant technological change. As a result, the success of our products obsolete business requires us to develop and/or less attractive.incorporate leading technologies. Such technologies are subject to rapid obsolescence. Our abilityinability to anticipate changes in technology andmaintain access to successfully develop and introduce new and enhanced products on a timely basis will be a significant factor inthese technologies (either through development or licensing) may adversely affect our ability to remain competitive. Our failurecompete. If we are unable to successfully and timely launchdifferentiate our products, maintain a low-cost footprint or compete effectively with technology-focused new productsmarket entrants, we may lose market share or adopt new technologies, or a failure bybe forced to reduce prices, thereby lowering our customers to successfully launch new programs,margins. Any such occurrences could adversely affect our results. We cannot ensure that we will be able to achievefinancial condition, operating results and cash flows.

International trade agreements, including the technological advances that may be necessary for us to remain competitive or that certainratification of the USMCA, and our products will not become obsolete.

Our international operations and international trade agreements make us vulnerable to risks associated with doing business in foreign countries that can affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We manufacture a substantial portion of our products in Mexico, Germany and Poland and we sell our products internationally. Accordingly, unfavorable changes in foreign cost structures, trade protection laws, tariffs on aluminum, regulations and policies affecting trade and investments and social, political, labor or economic conditions in a specific country or region, among other factors, could have a negative effect on our business and results of operations. Legal and regulatory requirements differ among jurisdictions worldwide. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines, criminal sanctions, prohibitions on the conduct of our business and damage to our reputation. Although we have policies, controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws, our employees, contractors, or agents may violate our policies.

Changes inAs a result of changes to U.S. administrative policy, among other possible changes, there may be (i) changes to existing trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”) and European Union (EU)its anticipated successor agreement, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (“USMCA”); (ii) greater restrictions on free trade generally; and (iii) significant increases in tariffs on goods imported into the United States, particularly tariffs on products manufactured in Mexico. It remains unclear what the U.S. administration or foreign governments, including China, will or will not do with respect to tariffs, NAFTA, USMCA or other international trade agreements and policies. However, Mexico and the United States have ratified the USMCA and it is expected that Canada will ratify it in 2020. The USMCA currently includes several provisions relating to automobile manufacturing.  One provision requires that automobiles must have 75 percent of their components manufactured in Mexico, the United States, or Canada to qualify for zero tariffs (up from 62.5 percent under NAFTA). Another provision requires that 40 percent to 45 percent of automobile parts must be made by workers who earn $16 per hour by 2023.  Currently, our workers in Mexico make less than $16 per hour. Mexico has also agreed to pass new labor laws that are intended to make it easier for Mexican workers to unionize.  We do not know whether the USMCA will be ratified by Canada or, if ratified, what the final provisions of the USMCA will contain and how those provisions will impact us but it is possible that the USMCA, if ratified, could increase our cost of manufacturing in Mexico which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

A trade war, other governmental action related to tariffs or international trade agreements, changes in United States social, political, regulatory and economic conditions or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development and investment in the territories and countries where we currently developmanufacture and sell products, could adversely affect our business. A significant portionand any resulting negative sentiments towards the United States as a result of our business activities are conducted in Mexico. Current leadership in the U.S. federal government is not supportive of certain existing international trade agreements, including the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”). If the U.S. withdraws from or materially modifies NAFTA or certain other international trade agreements,such changes, likely would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations couldand cash flows.

6


Cost of manufacturing our products in Mexico, Germany and Poland may be adversely affected. In addition, proposalsaffected by tariffs imposed by the United States, trade protection laws, policies and other regulations affecting trade and investments, social, political, labor, or general economic conditions. Other factors that can affect the business and financial results of our Mexican, German and Polish operations include, but are not limited to, institute a border adjustmentchanges in cost structures, currency effects of 20 percent for imports could have a negative impact on our operations.the Mexican Peso, Euro and Polish Zloty, availability and competency of personnel and tax regulations.

Fluctuations in foreign currencies and commodity and energy prices may adversely impact our financial condition.results.

Due to the growth of our operations outside of the United States, we have experienced increasedexperience exposure to foreign currency gains and losses in the ordinary course of our business. As a result, fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar, the Mexican peso, the Euro, the Polish Zloty and any currencies of other countries in which we conduct our business may have a material impact on our financial condition, as cash flows generated in foreign currencies may be used, in part, to service our U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities, or vice versa.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may also affect the value of our foreign assets as reported in U.S. dollars, and may adversely affect reported earnings and, accordingly, the comparability ofperiod-to-period results of operations. Changes in currency exchange rates may affect the relative prices at which we and our foreign competitors sell products in the same market. In addition, changes in the value of the relevant currencies may affect the cost of certain items required in our operations. We cannot ensure that fluctuations in exchange rates will not otherwise have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations or cause significant fluctuations in quarterly and annual results of operations.

Our business requires us to settle transactions between currencies in both directions - i.e., pesoin particular, U.S. dollar to Mexican Peso, Euro to U.S. dollar and Euro to U.S. Dollar, Euro to Zloty and vice versa for all transactions.Polish Zloty. To the greatest extent possible, we attempt to match the timing and magnitude of transaction settlements between currencies to create a “natural hedge.” Based on theour current business model and levels of production and sales activity, the net imbalance between currencies depends on specific circumstances. While changes in the terms of the contracts with our customers will be creatingcreate an imbalance between currencies that we are hedginghedge with foreign currency forward or option contracts, there can be no assurances that our hedging program will effectively offset the impact of the imbalance between currencies or that the net transaction balance will not change significantly in the future.

To manage this risk,Additionally, we may enter intoare exposed to commodity and energy price risks due to significant aluminum raw material requirements and the energy intensive nature of our operations. Natural gas and electricity prices are subject a to large number of variables that are outside of our control. We use financial derivatives and fixed-price agreements with suppliers to reduce the effect of any volatility on our financial results.

The foreign currency forward andor option contracts, the natural gas forward contracts, and the fixed-price agreements we enter into with financial institutions and suppliers are designed to protect against foreign exchange risks and price risks associated with certain existing assets and liabilities, certain firmly committed transactions and forecasted future cash flows. We have a program to hedge a portion of our material foreign exchange or commodity and energy price exposures, typically for up to 4248 months. However, we may choose not to hedge certain foreign exchange or commodity or energy price exposures for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, accounting considerations, and the prohibitive economic cost of hedging particular exposures.exposures, or our inability to identify willing counterparties. There is no guarantee that our hedge program will effectively mitigate our exposures to foreign exchange and commodity and energy price changes which could have material adverse effects on our cash flows and results of operations.

Our substantial indebtedness could adverselyFluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may also affect the USD value of assets and liabilities of our financial condition

We have a significant amount of new indebtedness. As of December 31, 2017, our total debt was $707.9 million ($683.6 million, net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $24.3 million), and we had availability of $157.2 million under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities,foreign operations, as well as 30.0 million Euros under a European revolving line of credit. The interest expense onassets and liabilities denominated in non-functional currencies such as the significant amount of new indebtedness will be significantly higher than historical interest expenseEuro, and couldmay adversely affect reported earnings and, accordingly, the comparability of period-to-period results of operations. Changes in currency exchange rates or commodity and energy prices may affect the relative prices at which we and our foreign competitors sell products in the same market. In addition, changes in the value of the relevant currencies or commodities and energy prices may affect the cost of certain items required in our operations. We cannot ensure that fluctuations in exchange rates or commodities and energy prices will not otherwise have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.condition or results of operations or cause significant fluctuations in quarterly and annual results of operations.

Subject to the limits contained in the Credit Agreement governing the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the indenture governing the Notes (the “Indenture”) and our other debt instruments, we may be able to incur substantial additional debt from time to time to finance working capital, capital expenditures, investments or acquisitions, or for other purposes. If weWe do so, the risks related to our high level of debt could intensify.

In addition, the Indenture and the Credit Agreement governing the Senior Secured Credit Facilities contain restrictive covenants that will limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long-term best interest. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of all our debt.

We may not be ableexpect to generate sufficient cash to servicerepay all of our indebtedness including(including the Notes,Term Loan Facility and Notes) or obligations relating to the redeemable preferred stock by their respective maturity dates and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy ourthese obligations, under our indebtedness, which may not be successful.

Our ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance our debt obligations or redeemable preferred stock depends on our financial and operating performance, which is subject to prevailing economic, industry and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business, economic and other factors beyond our control. We may not be able to maintain a sufficient level of cash flow from operating activities to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest and/or dividends on the Notesour debt, redeemable preferred stock and our other indebtedness.

If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations or redeemable preferred stock obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital or seek to restructure or refinance our indebtedness, including the Notes. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital and credit markets and our financial condition at such time.

7


We do not expect to generate sufficient cash to repay all principal due under the €250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.0% Senior Notes due June 15, 2025 (the “Notes”) of $243.1 million and the $400.0 million Senior Secured Term Loan Facility (“Term Loan Facility” or “Term Loan B”) due May 23, 2024 of $371.8 million (together with the Revolving Credit Facility referred to as the USD Senior Secured Credit Facility, “USD SSCF”), in full by the respective maturity dates, which will likely require us to refinance a portion or all of the outstanding debt. We might not be able to refinance the debt at satisfactory terms. Any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and associated transactions costs and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations and limit our financial flexibility. In addition, any failure to make payments of interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness and dividends or redemption payments on our redeemable preferred stock on a timely basis would likely result in a reduction of our credit rating,ratings, which could harm our ability to incur additional indebtedness.indebtedness or issue equity, or to refinance all or portions of these obligations. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations.or other payment obligations, including (i) redemption of our redeemable preferred stock at a redemption price equal to the greater of $300.0 million (2.0 times stated value) or the product of the number of common shares into which the redeemable preferred stock could be converted (5.3 million shares currently) and the then current market price of our common stock and (ii) the repurchase of the Notes or redemption of the redeemable preferred stock upon a change of control or repurchase of the Notes upon sales of certain assets. The holders of the preferred stock have redemption rights that allow them to force us to redeem the preferred stock on or after September 14, 2025 to the extent allowable under Delaware Law.  In the absence of such cash flows and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problemsconstraints and might be required to sell material assets or operations to attempt to meet our debt service and other obligations. The Credit Agreementcredit agreements governing the USD SSCF and the EUR 45.0 million credit line under the EUR Senior Secured Credit FacilitiesFacility (“EUR SSCF”), taken together the Global Senior Secured Credit Facility (“GSSCF”), and the Indenture willfor the Notes restrict our ability to conduct asset sales and/or use the proceeds from asset sales. We may not be able to consummate these asset sales to raise capital or sell assets at prices and on terms that we believe are fair, and any proceeds that we do receive may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due. For more information on the Indenture, see Exhibit 4.2due, as well as payments due with respect to this Annual Report onForm 10-K.our redeemable preferred stock. If we cannot meet our debt service obligations, the holders of our debt may accelerate our debt and, to the extent such debt is secured, foreclose on our assets. In such an event, we may not have sufficient assets to repay all of our debt.

Under the USD SSCF and EUR SSCF, we had available unused commitments of $156.4 million and 44.6 million Euros, respectively, as of December 31, 2019, which are critical to the Company’s ability to pay all of its obligations in a timely manner.

The credit lines under the USD SSCF and EUR SSFC will mature on May 23, 2022 and May 22, 2022, respectively, which is prior to the maturities of our other outstanding debt. We might not be able to extend these credit lines beyond the current due dates or may only be able to extend them for smaller amounts. This in turn might reduce our ability to refinance our other outstanding debt or other obligations in future years. It might also cause the rating agencies to downgrade our credit ratings. Additionally, it might require us to hold more cash in our bank accounts to ensure our ability to pay our obligations in a timely manner, which in turn could reduce our ability to pay down debt or other obligations.

Our substantial indebtedness and the corresponding interest expense could adversely affect our financial condition

We have a significant amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2019, our total debt was $630.6 million ($615.0 million net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $15.6 million). Additionally, we had availability of $156.4 million under the USD SSCF as well as 44.6 million Euros under the EUR SSCF at December 31, 2019.

A significant portion of our cash flow from operations will be used to pay our interest expense and will not be available for other business purposes.  We cannot be certain that our business will generate sufficient cash flow or that we will be able to enter into future financings that will provide sufficient proceeds to meet or pay the interest on our debt.

Subject to the limits contained in the credit agreements governing our GSSCF and the indenture governing our  €250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.0% Senior Notes due June 15, 2025 (the “Notes”) (with outstanding principal balance of €217.0 million at December 31 2019) and our other debt instruments, we may be able to incur substantial additional debt from time to time to finance working capital, capital expenditures, investments or acquisitions, or for other purposes. If we do so, the risks related to our high level of debt could intensify.

In addition, the indenture covering the Notes (the “Indenture”) and the credit agreements governing the GSSCF and our other debt instruments contain restrictive covenants that among other things, could limit our ability to incur liens, engage in mergers and acquisitions, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of assets, make investments, acquisitions, redeem our capital stock or pay dividends. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of the maturity of all of our debt.

A downgrade of our credit rating or a decrease of the prices of the Company’s common stock, the USD SSCF or the Notes could adversely impact our financial performance.

8


The Company, its USD SSCF, and the Notes, are rated by Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s. These ratings are widely followed by investors, customers, and suppliers, and a downgrade by one or both of these rating agencies might cause: suppliers to cancel our contracts, demand price increases, or decrease payment terms; customers to reduce their business activities with us; or investors to reconsider investments in financial instruments issued by Superior, all of which might cause a decrease of the price of our common stock, our Notes, and the price of the bilaterally traded Term Loan B which is a part of the USD SSCF.

A decrease in our common stock, Notes and/or Term Loan B prices, in turn, might accelerate such negative trends. A reduction in the price of the Notes and Term Loan B implies an increase of the yield debt investors demand to provide us with financing, which, in turn, would make it more difficult for us to refinance our existing debt, redeemable preferred stock obligations and/or future debt or redeemable preferred stock obligations.  

The terms of the Credit Agreementcredit agreement governing the Senior Secured Credit Facilities andGSSCF, the Indenture, will, and other debt instruments, as well as the documents governing other debt that we may incur in the future, may restrict our current and future operations, particularly our ability to respond to changes or to take certain actions.

The Indenture, and the Credit Agreementcredit agreements governing the Senior Secured Credit Facilities,GSSCF and our other debt instruments, and the documents governing other debt that we may incur in the future, may contain a number of restrictive covenants that impose

significant operating and financial restrictions on us and may limit our ability to engage in acts that may be in our long-term best interests, including restrictions on our ability to:

incur additional indebtedness and guarantee indebtedness;

create or incur liens;

engage in mergers or consolidations or sell all or substantially all of our assets;

sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of assets;

make investments, acquisitions, loans or advances or other restricted payments;

pay dividends or distributions, repurchase our capital stock or make certain other restricted payments;

prepay, redeem, or repurchase any subordinated indebtedness;

designate our subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries;

enter into agreements which limit the ability of ournon-guarantor subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other payments to us; and

enter into certain transactions with our affiliates.

In addition, the restrictive covenants in the Credit Agreementcredit agreement governing the Senior Secured Credit FacilitiesGSSCF and other debt instruments require us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial condition tests to the extent subject to certain financial covenant conditions. Our ability to meet those financial ratios and tests can be affected by events beyond our control. We may not meet those ratios and tests.

A breach of the covenants or restrictions under the Indenture governing the Notes, under the credit agreement governing the GSSCF, or under the Credit Agreement governing the Senior Secured Credit Facilitiesother debt instruments could result in an event of default under the applicable indebtedness. Such a default may allow the creditors under such facility to accelerate the related debt, which may result in the acceleration of any other debt to which a cross-acceleration or cross-default provision applies. In addition, an event of default under the Credit Agreementcredit agreement governing our Senior Secured Credit FacilitiesGSSCF would permit the lenders under our revolving credit facilityfacilities to terminate all commitments to extend further credit under that facility.these facilities. Furthermore, if we were unable to repay the amounts due and payable under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities,GSSCF or under other secured debt instruments, those lenders could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. We have pledged substantially all of our assets as collateral under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities.GSSCF. In the event our lenders or holders of the Notes accelerate the repayment of our borrowings, we may not have sufficient assets to repay that indebtedness or be able to borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. Even if we are able to obtain new financing, it may not be on commercially reasonable terms or on terms acceptable to us. As a result of these restrictions, we may be:

limited in how we conduct our business;

unable to raise additional debt or equity financing to operate during general economic or business downturns; or

unable to compete effectively or to take advantage of new business opportunities. These restrictions, along with restrictions that may be contained in agreements evidencing or governing other future indebtedness, may affect our ability to grow or pursue other important initiatives in accordance with our growth.growth strategy.

Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly.

Borrowings under our Senior Secured Credit FacilitiesGSSCF are at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness couldwill increase even though the amount borrowed remains the same, and our net

9


income and cash flows, including cash available

for servicing our indebtedness, would correspondingly decrease. As of December 31, 2017,2019, approximately $386.8$371.8 million of our debt was variable rate debt. Our anticipated annual interest expense on $386.8$371.8 million variable rate debt at the current rate of 6.055.7 percent would be $23.4$21.2 million. In the future, we may enterWe have entered into interest rate swaps that involve the exchange ofexchanging floating for fixed rate interest payments in order to reduce interest rate volatility. As of December 31, 2019, we have executed interest rate swaps for $260.0 million, maturing $25.0 million March 31, 2020, $35.0 million December 31, 2020, $50 million September 30, 2022, and $150 million December 31, 2022. In the future, we may again enter into interest rate swaps to reduce interest rate volatility. However, we may not maintain interest rate swaps with respect to all of our variable rate indebtedness, and any swaps we enter into may not fully mitigate our interest rate risk.

We may be adversely affected by changes in LIBOR reporting practices, the method in which LIBOR is determined or the use of alternative reference rates.

The interest rates under our USD SSCF are calculated using LIBOR. On July 27, 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (the authority that regulates LIBOR) announced that it intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021 and it is unclear whether new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established. If LIBOR ceases to exist, a comparable or successor reference rate as approved by the Administrative Agent under the USD SSCF will apply or such other reference rate as may be agreed by the Company and the lenders under the credit agreement governing the USD SSCF. The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, is considering replacing U.S. dollar LIBOR with a newly created index, calculated based on repurchase agreements backed by treasury securities. It is not possible to predict the effect of these changes, other reforms or the establishment of alternative reference rates in the United Kingdom, the United States or elsewhere. To the extent these interest rates increase, our interest expense will increase, which could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

We are subject to taxation related risks in multiple jurisdictions.

We are a U.S.-based multinational company subject to tax in multiple U.S. and foreign tax jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our global provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets or liabilities and in evaluating our tax positions on a worldwide basis. While we believe our tax positions are consistent with the tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we conduct our business, it is possible that these positions may be overturned by jurisdictional tax authorities, which may have a significant impact on our global provision for income taxes. Tax laws are dynamic and subject to change as new laws are passed and new interpretations of the law are issued or applied. We are also subject to ongoing tax audits. These audits can involve complex issues, which may require an extended period of time to resolve and can be highly subjective. Tax authorities may disagree with certain tax reporting positions taken by us and, as a result, assess additional taxes against us. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits in order to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Reform”) was signed into law. The newly enacted Tax Reform, among other things, contains significant changes to corporate taxation, including the reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, aone-time transition tax on offshore earnings at reduced tax rates regardless of whether earnings are repatriated, the elimination of U.S. tax on foreign dividends (subject to certain important exceptions), new taxes on certain foreign earnings, a new minimum tax related to payments to foreign subsidiaries and affiliates, immediate deductions for certain new investments and the modification or repeal of many business deductions and credits.

The changes effected by the Tax Reform required us to remeasure existing net deferred tax liabilities using the lower rate in the period of enactment. We have reported provisional amounts for the income tax effects of Tax Reform for which the accounting is incomplete but a reasonable estimate could be determined. Based on a continued analysis of the estimates and further guidance on the application of the law, it is anticipated that additional revisions may occur throughout the allowable measurement period.

In addition, governmental tax authorities are increasingly scrutinizing the tax positions of companies. Many countries in the European Union, as well as a number of other countries and organizations such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, are actively considering changes to existing tax laws that, if enacted, could increase our tax obligations in countries where we do business. The impact of tax reform in the US or other foreign tax law changes could result in an overall tax rate increase to our business.

Increases in the costs and restrictions on availability of raw materials could adversely affect our operating margins and cash flow.

Generally, we obtain our raw materials, supplies and energy requirements from various sources. Although we currently maintain alternative sources, our business is subject to the risk of price increases and periodic delays in delivery. Fluctuations in the prices of raw materials may be driven by the supply/supply and demand relationship for that commodity or governmental regulation.regulation, including trade laws and tariffs. In addition, if any of our suppliers seek bankruptcy relief or otherwise cannot continue their business as anticipated, the availability or price of raw materials could be adversely affected.

Although we are able to periodically pass certain aluminum cost increases on to our customers, we may not be able to pass along all changes in aluminum costs (e.g. for aftermarket), or there may be a delay in passing the aluminum costs onto our

customers. Our customers are not obligated to accept energy or other supply cost increases that we may attempt to pass along to them. This inability to pass on these cost increases to our customers could adversely affect our operating margins and cash flow, possibly resulting in lower operating income and profitability.flows.

Aluminum and alloy pricing, and the timing of our receipt of payment from customers for aluminum price fluctuations, may have a material effect on our operating margins and results of operations.cash flows.

The cost of aluminum is a significant component in the overall cost of a wheel and in our selling prices to OEM customers. The priceCustomer prices are adjusted for fluctuations in aluminum we purchase is adjusted monthlyprices based primarily on changes in certain published market indices, but the timing of suchprice adjustments is based on specific customer agreements and can vary from monthly to quarterly. As a result, the timing of aluminum price adjustments with customers flowing through sales rarely will match the timing of such changes in cost and can result in fluctuations to our gross profit. This is especially true during periods of frequent increases or decreases in the market price of aluminum.

10


The aluminum we use to manufacture wheels also contains additional alloy materials, including silicon. The cost of alloying materials is also is a component of the overall cost of a wheel. The price of the alloys we purchase is also based on certain published market indices; however, most of our customer agreements do not provide price adjustments for changes in market prices of alloying materials. Increases or decreases in the market prices of these alloying materials could have a material effect on our operating margins and results of operations.cash flows.

There is a risk of discontinuation of the E.U. anti-dumping duty from China which may increase the competitive pressure from Chinese producers, primarilyincluding in the aftermarket.

In 2010, the European Commission imposed provisional anti-dumping duties of 22.3 percent on imports of aluminum road wheels from China after a complaint of unfair competition from European manufacturers. The European Commission argued that the EU manufacturers had suffered a significant decrease in production and sales, and a loss of market share, as well as price depression due to cheaper imports from China. On January 23, 2017, the European Commission decided to maintain the anti-dumping duties (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/109) for another five yearfive-year period. The anti-dumping duties protect the EU producers until January 24, 2022. After this date, the competitive pressures from Chinese producers, which have cost advantages, primarily in the aftermarket, may adversely affect the company’s assets,Company’s financial condition, and results of operations or prospects.and cash flows.

We are subject to various environmental laws.

We incur costs to comply with applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in the ordinary course of our business. We cannot ensure that we have been or will be at all times in complete compliance with such laws and regulations. Failure to be in compliance with such laws and regulations could result in material fines or sanctions. Additionally, changes to such laws or regulations may have a significant impact on our cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.

We are also subject to various foreign, federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, including those governing discharges into the air and water, the storage, handling and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes, the remediation of soil and groundwater contaminated by hazardous substances or wastes and the health and safety of our employees. The nature of our current and former operations and the history of industrial uses at some of our facilities expose us to the risk of liabilities or claims with respect to environmental and worker health and safety matters which could have a material adverse effect on our financial health.condition. In addition, some of our properties are subject to indemnification and/or cleanup obligations of third parties with respect to environmental matters. However, in the event of the insolvency or bankruptcy of such third parties, we could be required to bearassume the liabilities that would otherwise be the responsibility of such third parties.

Further, changes in legislation or regulation imposing reporting obligations on, or limiting emissions of greenhouse gases from, or otherwise impacting or limiting our equipment and operations or from the vehicles that use our products could adversely affect demand for those vehicles or require us to incur costs to become compliant with such regulations.

We are from time to time subject to litigation, which could adversely impactaffect our financial condition or results of operations.

The nature of our business exposes us to litigation in the ordinary course of our business. We are exposed to potential product liability and warranty risks that are inherent in the design, manufacture and sale of automotive products, the failure of which could result in property damage, personal injury or death. Accordingly, individual or class action suits alleging product liability or warranty claims could result. Although we currently maintain what we believe to be suitable and adequate product liability insurance in excess of our self-insured amounts, we cannot assure youguarantee that we will be able to maintain such insurance on acceptable terms or that such insurance will provide adequate protection against potentialfuture liabilities. In addition, if any of our products prove to be defective, we may be required to participate in a recall. A successful claim brought against us in excess of available insurance coverage, if any, or a requirement to participate in any product recall, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, or financial condition. We cannot give assurance that any current or future claims will not adversely affect our cash flows, financial condition or results of operations.cash flows.

Our business involvesrequires extensive product development activities leading to the creation oflaunch new products. In the case of new products,Accordingly, there is a risk that wheels under development may not be ready by the start of production (“SOP”) and/or may fail to meet the customer’s specifications. In any such case, warranty or compensation claims might be raised, or litigation might be commenced, against the company. Moreover, the company could lose its reputation of an entrepreneur actively developing new and innovative solutions, which in turn could affect the volume of orders, particularly orders for new designs.Company.

Moreover, there are risks related to civil liability under our customer supply contracts (civil liability clauses in contracts with customers, contractual risks related to civil liability for causing delay in production launch, etc.). If we fail to ensure production launch as and when required by the customer, thus jeopardizing production processes at the customer’s facilities, this could lead to increased costs, giving rise to recourse claims against, or causing loss of orders by the company.Company. This could also have an adverse effect on our assets, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.cash flows.

11


We may be unable to attract and retain key personnel.personnel, including our senior management team, which may adversely affect our ability to conduct our business.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to attract, hire, train and retain qualified managerial, operational, engineering, sales and marketing personnel. We face significant competition for these types of employees in our industry. We may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining the personnel we require to conduct our operations successfully. In addition, key personnel may leave us and compete against us. Our success also depends, to a significant extent, on the continued service of our senior management team. We may be unsuccessful in replacing key managers who either resign or retire. The lossDuring the last several years we have experienced significant turnover in our senior management members, additional losses of any membermembers of our senior management team or other experienced senior employees could impair our ability to execute our business plans and strategic initiatives, cause us to lose customers and experience reduced net sales, or lead to employee morale problems and/or the loss of other key employees. In any such event, our financial condition, results of operations, internal control over financial reporting or cash flows could be adversely affected.

Furthermore, in order to remain competitive and retain our Europe segment employees, the company may be forced to increase its labor costs at a faster pace than it historically has done. Labor costs represent a considerable part of the cost of our Europe segment’s products. Though the workforce currently costs less in Poland than in other EU member states, the difference should decrease over time as the Polish economy is catching up with the average of the EU.

If the company fails to attract an adequate number of qualified employees and to retain such employees at salaries prevailing in the industry and increase labor efficiency and effectiveness (particularly with respect to our Europe segment’s manufacturing and production in Poland and Germany), this may have a material adverse effect on the company’s assets, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

We may be unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Many of our key controls rely on maintaining personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. GAAP in order to operate effectively. Material weaknesses or deficiencies may cause our financial statements to contain material misstatements, unintentional errors or omissions and late filings with regulatory agencies may occur. As part of the integration, we will be aligning the control framework in 2018 to ensure our Europe segment has adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange ActRule 13a-15(f). If the Europe segment is unable to implement the control framework in 2018, we will not have adequate control over financial reporting for the consolidated company.

A disruption in our information technology systems, including a disruption related to cybersecurity, could adversely affect our financial performance.

We rely on the accuracy, capacity and security of our information technology systems. Despite the security measures that we have implemented, including those measures related to cybersecurity, our systems, as well as those of our customers, suppliers and other service providers could be breached or damaged by computer viruses, malware, phishing attacks,denial-of-service attacks, natural orman-made incidents or disasters or unauthorized physical or electronic access. These types of incidents have become more prevalent and pervasive across industries, including in our industry, and are expected to continue in the future. A breach could result in business disruption, theft of our intellectual property, trade secrets or customer information and unauthorized access to personnel information. Although cybersecurity and the continued development and enhancement of our controls, processes and practices designed to protect our information technology systems from attack, damage or unauthorized access are a high priority for us, our activities and investment may not be deployed quickly enough or successfully protect our systems against all vulnerabilities, including technologies developed to bypass our security measures. In addition, outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees or customers to disclose access credentials or other sensitive information in order to gain access to our secure systems and networks. There are no assurances that our actions and investments to improve the maturity of our systems, processes and risk management framework or remediate vulnerabilities will be sufficient or completed quickly enough to prevent or limit the impact of any cyber intrusion. Moreover, because the techniques used to gain access to or sabotage systems often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate the methods necessary to defend against these types of attacks and we cannot predict the extent, frequency or impact these problems may have on us. To the extent that our business is interrupted or data is lost, destroyed or inappropriately used or disclosed, such disruptions could adversely affect our competitive position, relationships with our customers, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. In addition, we may be required to incur significant costs to protect against the damage caused by these disruptions or security breaches in the future.

We are also dependent on security measures that some of our third-party customers, suppliers and other service providers take to protect their own systems and infrastructures. Some of these third parties store or have access to certain of our sensitive data, as well as confidential information about their own operations, and as such are subject to their own cybersecurity threats. Any security breach of any of these third-parties’ systems could result in unauthorized access to our information technology systems, cause us to benon-compliant with applicable laws or regulations, subject us to legal claims or proceedings, disrupt our operations, damage our reputation, and cause a loss of confidence in our products and services, any of which could adversely affect our financial performance.

Competitors could copy our products or technologies and we could violate protected intellectual property rights or trade secrets of our competitors or other third parties.

We register business-related intellectual property rights, such as industrial designs and trademarks, hold licenses and other agreements covering the use of intellectual property rights, and have taken steps to ensure that our

trade secrets and technologicalknow-how remain confidential. Nevertheless, there is a risk that third parties would attempt to copy, in full or in part, our products, technologies or industrial designs, or to obtain unauthorized access and use of companyCompany secrets, technologicalknow-how or other protected intellectual property rights. Also, other companies could successfully develop technologies, products or industrial designs similar to ours, and thus potentially compete with us.

Further, there can be no assurance that we will not unknowingly infringe intellectual property rights of our competitors, such as patents and industrial designs, especially due to the fact that the interpretations of what constitutes protected intellectual property may differ. Similarly, there is a risk that we will illegitimately use intellectual property developed by our employees, which is subject in each case to relevant regulations governing employee-created innovations. If a dispute concerning intellectual property rights arises, in which the relevant court issues an opinion on the disputed intellectual property rights contrary to us, identifying a breach of intellectual property rights, we may be required to pay substantial damages or to stop the use of such intellectual property. In addition, we are exposed to the risk of injunctions being imposed to prevent further infringement, leading to a decrease in the number of customer orders.

All these events could have a material adverse effect on our assets, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.cash flows.

We may be unable to successfully achieve expected benefits from12


Impairment of goodwill would negatively impact our joint ventures or acquisitions.consolidated results of operations and net worth.

As of December 31, 2019, we continuehad approximately $184.8 million of goodwill which represented approximately 14.1 percent of total assets on our consolidated balance sheet related to expand globally,our acquisition of Uniwheels. Goodwill is not amortized but we test it for impairment on an annual basis as of December 31, or on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment is more likely than not to have engaged,occurred, which could result in recognition of a goodwill impairment.  A goodwill impairment could materially adversely affect our results of operations for the period in which such charge is recorded.

Our business could be negatively impacted by a threatened proxy contest with two stockholders who have each nominated an individual for election to our Board of Directors at the 2020 annual meeting.

We recently received notices from each of GAMCO Asset Management Inc. (“GAMCO”) and may continueD.C. Capital LLC (“D.C. Capital”) announcing their intent to engage, in joint ventureseach nominate one individual for election to our Board of Directors at the 2020 annual meeting. If a proxy contest results from one or both notices received from GAMCO or D.C. Capital, our business could be adversely affected. Responding to nominations by activist stockholders are costly and we may pursue acquisitions that involve potential risks, including failure to successfully integratetime-consuming, and realizedivert the expected benefitsattention of such joint ventures or acquisitions. Integrating acquired operations is a significant challenge,our Board of Directors and there is no assurance that we will be able to managesenior management team from the integrations successfully. Failure to successfully integrate operations or to realize the expected benefitspursuit of such joint ventures or acquisitions may have an adverse impact onbusiness strategies, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our financial statements are subject to changes in accounting standards that could adversely impact our profitability or financial position.

Our consolidated financial statements are subject to the application of U.S. GAAP, which are periodically revised and/or expanded. Accordingly, from time to time, we are required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued by recognized authoritative bodies, including the FASB. Recently, accounting standard setters issued new guidance which further interprets or seeks to revise accounting pronouncements related to revenue recognition and lease accounting as well as to issue new standards expanding disclosures. The impact of accounting pronouncements that have been issued but not yet implemented is disclosed in our annual and quarterly reports on Form10-K and Form10-Q. An assessment of proposed standards is not provided, as such proposals are subject to change through the exposure process and, therefore, their effects on our consolidated financial statements cannot be meaningfully assessed. It is possible that future accounting standards we are required to adopt could change the current accounting treatment that we apply to our consolidated financial statements and that such changes could have a material adverse effect on our reported results of operations and financial position.

We may fail to comply with conditions of the state tax incentive programs in Poland.

We have three production plants in a special Poland economic zone, Tanobrzeska Specjalna Strefa Ekonomiczna Euro-Park Wislosan in Stalowa Wola, Poland. Our Polish operations were granted seveneight permits to operate in suchthis special economic zone, which allows us to benefit from Polish state tax incentives. The permits require certain conditions to be met, which include increasing the number of employees, keeping the number of employees at such level and incurring required capital expenditures. In addition, particular permits indicate deadlines for completion of respective stages of investments. For three of the seveneight permits, conditions have

already been fulfilled. As of December 31, 2017, the tax subsidies are limited to 2017 (for three permits) and 2026 (for four permits). If we do not fulfill the conditions required by the permits, the permits might be withdrawn and we would no longer benefit from state tax incentives, which may impact our assets, financial condition, results of operations or prospectscash flows in a material way. Furthermore, under current Polish regulations, special economic zones are scheduled to cease to exist in 2026.

We are currently unable to fully deduct interest charges on German and US indebtedness.

The interest deduction barrier (Zinsschranke) limitsunder German tax law (Zinsschranke) and US tax law limit the tax deductibility of interest expenses for a German business.expenses. If no exception to the interest deduction barrier applies,these limits apply, the net interest expense (interest expense less interest income) is deductible up to 30 percent of the taxable EBITDA (verrechenbares EBITDA) taxable in Germany and the US, respectively, in a given financial year.Non-deductible interest expenses can be carried forward. Interest carry-forwards are subject to the same tax cancellation rules as tax loss carry-forwards. Whenever interest expenses are not deductible or if an interest carry-forward is lost, the tax burden in future assessment periods could rise, which might have alone, or in combination, a material adverse effect on our assets, financial condition, results of operation or prospects.cash flows.

We may be exposed to risks related to existing and future profit and loss transfer agreements executed with German subsidiaries of Uniwheels.our European operations.

Profit and loss transfer agreements are one of the prerequisites of the taxation of Superior and its German subsidiaries as a German tax group. For tax purposes, a profit and loss transfer agreement must have a contract term for a minimum of five years. In addition, such agreement must be fully executed. If a profit and loss transfer agreement or its actual execution does not meet the prerequisites for the taxation as a German tax group, Superior Industries International AG (SII AG)(“SII AG”) and each subsidiary are taxed on their own income (and under certain circumstances even with retrospective effect). Additionally, 5 percent of dividends from the subsidiary to SII AG, or other Superior European controlling entities within the European Union would be regarded asnon-deductible expenses at the SII AG level.level, or level of other Superior European controlling entities. Furthermore, the compensation of a loss of a subsidiary would be regarded as a contribution by SII AG into the subsidiary and thus, would not directly reduce SII AG’s profits. As a consequence, if the profit and loss transfer agreements do not meet the prerequisites of a German tax group, this could have a future material adverse effect on our assets, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.cash flows.

We may not have the ability to use cash to settle the principal amount of the Notes upon redemption or to repurchase the Notes upon a fundamental change, which could adversely affect our financial condition.

The Notes are redeemable any time on or after June 15, 2020 at a redemption price set forth in the Indenture. In addition, the company may redeem some or all of the Notes prior to June 15, 2020 at a price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount thereof plus a “make-whole” premium and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the redemption date. Prior to June 15, 2020, the company may redeem up to 40 percent of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes using the proceeds of certain equity offerings at the redemption price set forth in the Indenture. If the company experiences a change of control or sells certain assets, the company may be required to offer to purchase the Notes from holders. If we do not have adequate cash available or cannot obtain additional financing, or our use of cash is restricted by applicable law, regulations or agreements governing our current or future indebtedness, we may not be able to repurchase the Notes when required under the Indenture, which would constitute an event of default under the Indenture. An event of default under the Indenture could also lead to a default under other agreements governing our current and future indebtedness, and if the repayment of such other indebtedness were accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds to repay the indebtedness and repurchase the Notes or make cash payments upon conversion of the Notes.

The terms of the Notes could delay or prevent an attempt to take over our company.

The terms of the Notes require us to repurchase the Notes in the event of a fundamental change. A takeover of our company would constitute a fundamental change. This could have the effect of delaying or preventing a takeover of our company that may otherwise be beneficial to our stockholders.

Purchase of additional shares of Uniwheels could take more time than anticipated and may take more resources andrequire a higher purchase price.

Superior executed a Domination and Profit Loss Transfer Agreement, “DPLTA”, which became effective in January 2018. According to the terms of the DPLTA, SuperiorSII AG offered to purchase any further tenderedoutstanding shares of Uniwheels for cash consideration of Euro 62.18, or approximately Polish Zloty 264 per share. This62.18. The cash consideration paid to shareholders, which tendered under the DPTLA may be subject to change based on appraisal proceedings that the minority shareholders of Uniwheels have initiated.

13


ITEM 1B - UNRESOLVEDUNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2 - PROPERTIES

Our worldwide headquarters is located in Southfield, Michigan. In our North American operations, we maintain and operate fivefour facilities that manufacture aluminum wheels for the automotive industry and a newincluding our facility for finishing wheels. Four of these fivewheels with physical vapor deposition. These facilities are located in Chihuahua, Mexico and one facility is located in Fayetteville, Arkansas. The fiveMexico. These manufacturing facilities currently encompass 2.5approximately two million square feet of manufacturing space. We own all of our manufacturing facilities in North America, and we lease our worldwide headquarters located in Southfield, MichiganMichigan. During the third quarter of 2019, the Company initiated a plan to significantly reduce production and other temporary facilities.manufacturing operations at its Fayetteville, Arkansas, location. As of December 31, 2019, we are continuing to use the Arkansas facility for research and development activities and service wheel storage.

Our European operations include five locations. The European headquarters is situated in Bad Dürkheim, Germany which includes our European management, sales and distribution functions, as well as the logistics center and warehouse for the aftermarket business. The largest of European production operations consist of three production facilities the largest of which is in Stalowa Wola, Poland, which includes threeconsists of 3 plants. The newest plant in Poland was put into operation in the beginning of June 2016. Another plantproduction facility is situated in Werdohl, Germany, where most development work is performed. Forged wheels are manufactured in Fußgönheim, Germany, near the Bad Dürkheim offices. The newest plantEuropean locations also include a research and development center in Poland was put into operation in the beginning of June 2016.Lüdenscheid, Germany. Our European production facilities encompass approximately 1.5 million square feet. We own all of our manufacturing facilities in Europe, and we lease our European headquarters located in Bad Dürkheim, Germany.

In general, our manufacturing facilities, which have been constructed at various times, over the past several years, are in good operating condition and are adequate to meet our current production capacity requirements. There are active maintenance programs to keep these facilities in good condition, and we have an active capital spending program to replace equipment as needed to maintain factory reliability and remain technologically competitive on a worldwide basis.

Additionally, reference is made to Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” Note 9, “Property, Plant and Equipment” and Note 1516 “Leases, and Related Parties”, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.

ITEM 3 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are party to various legal and environmental proceedings incidental to our business. Certain claims, suits and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business have been filed or are pending against us. Based on facts now known, we believe all such matters are adequately provided for, covered by insurance, are without merit, and/or involve such amounts that would not materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. See alsoRefer to under Item 1A, “Risk Factors - We are from time to time subject to litigation, which could adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations” of this Annual Report.

ITEM 4 - MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4A --INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Information regarding executive officers who are also Directors is contained in our 20182020 Proxy Statement under the caption “Election of Directors.” Such information is incorporated into Part III, Item 10, “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.” With the exception of the CEO, allAll executive officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the will of the Board of Directors. ForThe following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our executive officers.

Name

Age

Position

Majdi B. Abulaban

Kevin Burke

Joanne M. Finnorn

56

51

55

President and Chief Executive Officer

Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Michael J. Hatzfeld Jr.

47

Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller

Parveen Kakar

53

Senior Vice President of Sales, Marketing and Product Development

Matti M. Masanovich

48

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Andreas Meyer

Dr. Karsten Obenaus

54

55

Senior Vice President, President, Europe

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Europe

14


Name

Age

Position

Set forth below is a description of the CEO’s employment agreement, see “Employment Agreements” in our 2018 Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Listed below alphabetically are the name, age, position and business experience of each of our officers, as of the filing date:executive officers.

 

Name

  Age  

Position

  Assumed
Position
Scot S. Bowie  44  Vice President and Corporate Controller  2015
    Corporate Controller, Black Diamond Equipment  2014
    Chief Accounting Officer, Affinia Group Inc.  2011
    Corporate Controller of External Reporting, Affinia Group Inc.  2008
Joanne M. Finnorn  53  Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary  2017
    Vice President and General Counsel of Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company  2016
    General Counsel and Principal of HouseSetter LLC  2013
    Principal of Finnorn Law & Advisory Services  2012
    Vice President, Subscriber Services, OnStar  2011
    Vice President and General Counsel, OnStar  2004
Parveen Kakar  51  Senior Vice President Sales, Marketing and Product Development  2014
    Senior Vice President, Corporate Engineering and Product Development  2008
    Vice President, Program Development  2003
Nadeem Moiz  47  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  2017
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Direct ChassisLink Inc.  2013
    Vice President of Finance Strategic Planning and Supply Chain Finance, Graphic Packaging International  2011
Shawn J. Pallagi  60  Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer  2016
    Senior Vice President Chief Human Resource Officer, Remy International  2014
    Vice President, Human Resources, Remy International  2011
    Executive Director, Human Resources, Global Manufacturing and Labor Relations, General Motors  2006
James F. Sistek  54  Senior Vice President, Business Operations and Systems  2014
    Chief Executive Officer and Founder, Infologic, Inc.  2013
    Vice President, Shared Services and Chief Information Officer, Visteon Corporation  2009
Donald J. Stebbins  60  President and Chief Executive Officer  2014
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Visteon Corporation  2008
Robert M. Tykal  55  Senior Vice President, Operations  2017
    Vice President, Global Operations, Gilbarco Veeder Root, Fortive Corporation  2013
    President and Chief Executive Officer, DaimlerChrysler AG/MTU Drive Shafts  2002

Majdi B. Abulaban

Mr. Abulaban is the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, a position he has held since May 2019. Mr. Abulaban was previously employed by Aptiv PLC (formerly Delphi Automotive) (NYSE: APTV) (“Aptiv”), a technology company that develops safer, greener and more connected solutions for a diverse array of global customers, from 1985 to April 2019, most recently as Senior Vice President and Group President, Global Signal and Power Solutions Segment from January 2017 to April 2019. From February 2012 to January 2017, Mr. Abulaban served as the Senior Vice President and Group President, Global Electrical and Electronic Architecture Segment and President of Aptiv Asia Pacific. Prior to that, Mr. Abulaban held various business unit leadership positions with Delphi in China, Singapore and the United States. Mr. Abulaban is currently a member of the Board of Directors of SPX FLOW, Inc. (NYSE: FLOW), a global supplier of highly specialized, engineered solutions. Mr. Abulaban holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and a Master of Business Administration from the Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University.

Kevin Burke

Mr. Burke is the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, a position he has held since October 2019.  He joined Superior from Valeo North America, a Tier One auto supplier and technology company, where he was Head of Human Resources – North America since March 2018, with responsibility for all human resources across the United States, Mexico and Canada.   From 2015 to 2017, he was at Lear Corporation, a Tier One auto supplier, as Vice President of Human Resources – Asia Pacific based in Shanghai, China.  From 2013 to 2015, Mr. Burke was the Chief Human Resources Officer for ITC Holdings, an independent electric transmission company.  Prior to that, he held various HR leadership positions with General Mills, Pulte Homes and Dow Corning Corporation.  Mr. Burke earned a Bachelor of Arts in Communication and a Master of Labor & Industrial Relations from Michigan State University, as well as a Master of Business Administration from Northwestern University’s Kellogg School.

Joanne M. Finnorn

Ms. Finnorn is the Company’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, a position she has held since September 2017. Previously, Ms. Finnorn served as the Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer of Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company from February 2016 to August 2017. From 2013 to January 2016, Ms. Finnorn served as General Counsel of HouseSetter LLC, a home monitoring company and was the Principal of Finnorn Law & Advisory Services. Ms. Finnorn began her career as an attorney with General Motors, served as General Counsel of GMAC’s European Operations in Zurich, Switzerland and Vice President & General Counsel and Vice President, Subscriber Services, for OnStar LLC.  Ms. Finnorn obtained a Bachelor degree from Alma College and a Juris Doctor from Stanford Law School.

Michael J. Hatzfeld Jr.

Mr. Hatzfeld Jr. is the Company’s Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller, a position he has held since December 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Hatzfeld Jr. held various positions with General Motors Company since 2011, most recently as Controller, US Sales and Marketing Unit in 2018, Controller, Global Revenue Recognition Project from 2016 to 2017, Controller, Customer Care and Aftersales Units from 2014 to 2016 and Assistant Director, Corporate Reporting and Analysis from 2013 to 2014. Mr. Hatzfeld Jr. began his career in public accounting at Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Hatzfeld Jr. holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Duquesne University. Mr. Hatzfeld Jr. is also a Certified Public Accountant.

Parveen Kakar

Mr. Kakar is the Company’s Senior Vice President of Sales, Marketing and Product Development, a position that he has held since September 2014. Mr. Kakar joined the Company in 1989 as the Director of Engineering Services and has held various positions at the Company since then. From July 2008 to September 2014, Mr. Kakar served as the Company’s Senior Vice President of Corporate Engineering and Product Development and from 2003 to 2008 as the Vice President of Program Development. Mr. Kakar holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Punjab Engineering College in India.

In addition to the officers of the Company we have two key executives, Dr. Wolfgang Hiller and Dr. Karsten Obenaus, that manage the European operations.15


Matti Masanovich

Mr. Masanovich is the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, a position he has held since September 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Masanovich was the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at General Cable Corporation (NYSE: BGC), a publicly held global wire and cable manufacturer, from November 2016 to July 2018. Prior to that, Mr. Masanovich served as the short-term Vice President and Controller of International Automotive Components, an automotive interiors supplier, from August 2016 to October 2016. From November 2013 to April 2016, Mr. Masanovich served as Global Vice President of Finance, Packard Electrical and Electronic Architecture (E/EA) Division in Shanghai, China at APTIV (NYSE: APTV) (formerly Delphi Automotive), an automotive technology company. Mr. Masanovich previously served in various executive positions with both public and private companies. Mr. Masanovich began his career in public accounting at Coopers & Lybrand and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Mr.

Masanovich holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Windsor. Mr. Masanovich is also a Chartered Accountant.

Andreas Meyer

Mr. Meyer is the Company’s Senior Vice President, President, Europe, a position he has held since November 1, 2019. He was previously the Senior Vice President of Snop / Tower Automotive Holding GmbH, a first tier automotive supplier, from January 2017 to October 2019. Prior to that, he served as Tower’s Vice President of Operations from July 2015 to January 2017. From July 2013 to June 2015, Mr. Meyer was the Managing Director of Hörmann Automotive GmbH (“Hörmann”), a first tier automotive supplier. Mr. Meyer also served as Managing Director of Hörmann Automotive Components from October 2007 to June 2015. Mr. Meyer graduated from Helmut Schmidt University Hamburg with a degree in business management.

Dr. Karsten Obenaus

Dr. Obenaus is the Company’s Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer Europe; Global ERM & Strategic Planning, a position he has held since July 2017. Prior to that, Dr. Obenaus served as the Chief Financial Officer of UNIWHEELS AG from November 2014 and Head of Accounting, Head of Risk Management, Head of Controlling and Chief Financial Officer Polish Operations from 2008. Before that, he served as the Head of Controlling at the German alloy wheel producer ATS, which was later acquired by Uniwheels. Dr. Obenaus started his professional career in 1994 and obtained accounting and finance positions at Deutsche Industrie-Treuhand, Goedecke AG (Pfizer Group) and EMTEC (BASF Group). He holds a Master degree in Economics and subsequently acquired a Doctorate in Economics at the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University of Frankfurt/Main.

16


PART II

ITEM 5 - MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Performance Graph

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SUP.”

The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return from December 31, 20122014 through December 31, 2017,2019, for our common stock, the Russell 2000 and a peer group(1) of companies that we have selected for purposes of this comparison. We have assumed that dividends have been reinvested, and the returns of each company in the Russell 2000 and the peer group have been weighted to reflect relative stock market capitalization. The graph below assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2012,2014, in each of our common stock, the stocks comprising the Russell 2000 and the stocks comprising the peer group.

 

 

 

 

Superior

Industries

International, Inc.

 

 

Russel 2000

 

 

Peer Group(1)

 

  Superior
Industries
International, Inc.
   Russel 2000   Peer Group(1) 

2012

  $100   $100   $100 

2013

  $102   $139   $144 

2014

  $102   $146   $132 

 

$

100

 

 

$

100

 

 

$

100

 

2015

  $98   $139   $132 

 

$

96

 

 

$

95

 

 

$

92

 

2016

  $144   $169   $174 

 

$

141

 

 

$

116

 

 

$

115

 

2017

  $83   $194   $193 

 

$

81

 

 

$

132

 

 

$

135

 

2018

 

$

27

 

 

$

118

 

 

$

111

 

2019

 

$

22

 

 

$

148

 

 

$

144

 

 

(1)

We do not believe that there is a single published industry or line of business index that is appropriate for comparing stockholder returns. As a result, we have selected a peer group comprised of companies as disclosed in the 20182020 Proxy Statement.

Dividends

Per share quarterly cash dividends declared totaled $0.45 during 2017 and $0.72 during 2016. Continuation of dividends is contingent upon various factors, including economic and market conditions, none of which can be accurately predicted, and the approval of our Board of Directors.

Holders of Common Stock

As of March 12, 2018,February 21, 2020, there were approximately 368356 holders of record of our common stock.

Quarterly Common Stock Price Information

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SUP”.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales price per share of our common stock during the fiscal periods indicated.

   2017   2016 
   High   Low   High   Low 

First Quarter

  $27.40   $21.90   $23.43   $16.35 

Second Quarter

  $25.90   $18.58   $27.90   $21.53 

Third Quarter

  $20.95   $14.00   $32.12   $24.76 

Fourth Quarter

  $17.45   $13.95   $30.12   $22.45 

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following table shows our purchases of our common stock during the fourth quarter of 2017:

Period

(a)
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased1
(b)
Average Price
Paid Per Share
(c)
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced
Programs
(d)
Maximum Dollar
Value of Shares
That May Yet be
Purchased Under
Publicly Announced
Programs(1)
(in thousands)

October 2017

—  —  —  34,600,000

November 2017

—  —  —  34,600,000

December 2017

—  —  —  34,600,000

Total

—  —  

(1)In October 2014, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program (the “2014 Repurchase Program”) authorizing the repurchase of up to $30.0 million of our common stock. Under the 2014 Repurchase Program, we repurchased common stock from time to time on the open market or in private transactions, totaling 1,056,954 shares of company stock at a cost of $19.6 million in 2015 and 585,970 shares for $10.3 million in January of 2016, which completed the 2014 Repurchase Program. The repurchased shares described above were either canceled and retired or added to treasury stock after the reincorporation in Delaware in 2015.

In January of 2016, our Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program (the “2016 Repurchase Program”), authorizing the repurchase of up to an additional $50.0 million of common stock. The timing and extent of the repurchases under the 2016 Repurchase Program will depend upon market conditions and other corporate considerations in our sole discretion. Under the 2016 Repurchase Program, we repurchased common stock from time to time on the open market or in private transactions, totaling

454,718 shares of company stock at a cost of $10.4 million in 2016. In the aggregate, we purchased $20.7 million in company stock during 2016 under the 2014 Repurchase Program and 2016 Repurchase Program. During 2017, we purchased an additional 215,841 shares of company stock at a cost of $5.0 million under the 2016 Repurchase Program.Not applicable.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Except as set forth below, the company has not issued any securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) within the past three fiscal years.Not applicable.

On May 22, 2017, we completed the private placement of 140,202 shares of our Series A redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 9,798 shares of our Series B redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (together, the “Preferred Stock”), to TPG Growth III Sidewall, L.P. (the “Investor”) for a purchase price of $150.0 million. On August 30, 2017, our stockholders approved the conversion of the 9,798 shares of Series B redeemable preferred stock into Series A redeemable preferred stock and all shares of Series B redeemable preferred stock were automatically converted. Series A redeemable preferred stock is convertible into shares of Superior common stock equal to the number of shares determined by dividing the sum of the stated value and any accrued and unpaid dividends by the conversion price of $28.162.17

The private placement of the Preferred Stock is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act under Section 4(a)(2) and Regulation D thereunder. The Investor has represented to Superior that it is an “accredited investor” as defined by Rule 501 of the Securities Act and that the Preferred Stock is being acquired for investment purposes and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof and appropriate legends will be affixed to any certificates evidencing the shares of Preferred Stock. Additional information regarding this transaction is set forth in Note 13, “Redeemable Preferred Shares” in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.

On June 15, 2017, we issued €250.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 6.00% Senior Notes due June 15, 2025 (the “Notes”) to initial purchasers including J.P. Morgan Securities plc, Citigroup Global Markets Limited, RBC Europe Limited and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. The offering of the Notes is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act under Rule 144A and Regulation S. The purchasers of the notes have represented to Superior that they are either (1) Qualified Institutional Buyers within the meaning of Rule 144A of the Securities Act or (2) is a qualified investor outside of the United States. Additional information regarding this transaction is set forth in Note 12, “Long-Term Debt” in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.


Securities Authorized for Issue Under Equity Compensation Plans

The information about securities authorized for issuance under Superior’s equity compensation plans is included in Note 18,19, “Stock-Based Compensation” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report and will also be included in our 20182020 Proxy Statement under the caption “Securities Authorized for Issuance under the Equity Compensation Plans.”

ITEM 6 - SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.

The fiscal year of 2017 consisted of the53-week period ended December 31, 2017 and the 2016 and 2015 fiscal years consisted of the52-week periods ended on December 25, 2016 and December 27, 2015, respectively. Historically, our fiscal year ended on the last Sunday of the calendar year. Uniwheels, our European operation

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Income Statement (000s)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales (1)

 

$

1,372,487

 

 

$

1,501,827

 

 

$

1,108,055

 

 

$

732,677

 

 

$

727,946

 

Value added sales (2)

 

$

755,325

 

 

$

797,187

 

 

$

616,753

 

 

$

408,690

 

 

$

360,846

 

Gross profit (3)

 

$

116,062

 

 

$

163,527

 

 

$

102,897

 

 

$

86,204

 

 

$

71,217

 

Income (loss) from operations (4)

 

$

(50,059

)

 

$

85,805

 

 

$

21,518

 

 

$

54,602

 

 

$

36,294

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Superior (4)

 

$

(96,460

)

 

$

25,961

 

 

$

(6,203

)

 

$

41,381

 

 

$

23,944

 

Adjusted EBITDA (5)

 

$

168,795

 

 

$

185,623

 

 

$

140,085

 

 

$

88,511

 

 

$

76,053

 

Balance Sheet (000s)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets (6)

 

$

1,311,867

 

 

$

1,451,616

 

 

$

1,551,252

 

 

$

542,756

 

 

$

539,929

 

Long-term debt

 

$

611,025

 

 

$

661,426

 

 

$

679,552

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Redeemable preferred stock

 

$

160,980

 

 

$

144,463

 

 

$

144,694

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Share Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Basic

 

$

(5.10

)

 

$

0.29

 

 

$

(1.01

)

 

$

1.63

 

 

$

0.90

 

- Diluted

 

$

(5.10

)

 

$

0.29

 

 

$

(1.01

)

 

$

1.62

 

 

$

0.90

 

Dividends declared

 

$

0.18

 

 

$

0.36

 

 

$

0.45

 

 

$

0.72

 

 

$

0.72

 

acquired on May 30, 2017, is based on a calendar year end. These fiscal periods align as of December 31, 2017. Beginning in 2018, both our North American and European operations will be on a calendar fiscal year with each month ending on the last day of the month. For convenience of presentation, all fiscal years are referred to as beginning as of January 1, and ending as of December 31, but actually reflect our financial position and results of operations for the periods described above.

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 

Income Statement (000s)

      

Net sales

  $1,108,055  $732,677  $727,946  $745,447  $789,564 

Value added sales(1)

  $616,753  $408,690  $360,846  $369,355  $400,591 

Closure and Impairment Costs(2)

  $138  $1,458  $7,984  $8,429  $—   

Gross profit

  $102,897  $86,204  $71,217  $50,222  $64,061 

Income from operations

  $21,518  $54,602  $36,294  $17,913  $34,593 

Consolidated Income before income taxes and equity earnings

  $866  $54,721  $35,283  $15,702  $36,841 

Income tax benefit (provision)(3)

  $(6,875 $(13,340 $(11,339 $(6,899 $(14,017

Net income

  $(6,009 $41,381  $23,944  $8,803  $22,824 

Adjusted EBITDA(4)

  $140,085  $88,511  $76,053  $55,753  $63,616 

Balance Sheet (000s)

      

Current assets

  $417,383  $254,081  $245,820  $276,011  $384,218 

Current liabilities

  $195,059  $85,964  $73,862  $71,962  $99,430 

Working capital

  $222,324  $168,117  $171,958  $204,049  $284,788 

Total assets

  $1,551,252  $542,756  $539,929  $579,910  $653,388 

Long-term debt

  $679,552  $—    $—    $—    $—   

Shareholders’ equity

  $445,723  $398,226  $413,912  $439,006  $483,063 

Financial Ratios

      

Current ratio(5)

   2.1:1   3.0:1   3.3:1   3.8:1   3.9:1 

Return on average shareholders’ equity(6)

   (1.4)%   10.2  5.6  1.9  4.8

Share Data

      

Net income

      

- Basic

  $(1.01 $1.63  $0.90  $0.33  $0.83 

- Diluted

  $(1.01 $1.62  $0.90  $0.33  $0.83 

Shareholders’ equity atyear-end

  $17.89  $15.84  $15.86  $16.42  $17.79 

Dividends declared

  $0.45  $0.72  $0.72  $0.72  $0.20 

(1)

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, Topic ASC 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, on a modified retrospective basis. Accordingly, periods prior to 2018 have not been adjusted.

(2)

Value added sales is a key measure that is not calculated according to U.S. GAAP. In the discussion of operating results, we provide information regarding value added sales. Value added sales represents net sales less the value of aluminumRefer to “Management’s Discussion and services provided by outside service providers that are included in net sales. As discussed further below, arrangements with our customers allow us to pass on changes in aluminum prices and outside service provider costs; therefore, fluctuations in underlying aluminum prices and the use of outside service providers generally do not directly impact our profitability. Accordingly, value added sales is worthy of being highlighted for the benefit of users of our financial statements. Our intent is to allow users of the financial statements to consider our net sales information both with and without the aluminum and outside service provider cost components thereof. Management uses value added sales as a key metric to determine growth of the company because it eliminates the volatility of aluminum prices. During 2015, we modified the presentation of value added sales to also exclude third-party manufacturing costs passed directly through to customers and retrospectively applied this modification to 2012 through 2014. See theAnalysis, Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresMeasures” section of this Annual Report for a definition of value added sales and a reconciliation of value added sales to net sales.sales, the most comparable GAAP measure.

(2)(3)

SeeIn 2019, we recognized a non-cash charge to cost of sales of $14.8 million in connection with the plan to reduce production and manufacturing operations at our Fayetteville, Arkansas location, including $7.6 million of accelerated depreciation for excess equipment, $3.2 million write-down of supplies inventory, $1.6 million of employee severance, $0.6 million of accelerated amortization of right of use assets under operating leases and $1.8 million of relocation costs for redeployment of machinery and equipment (refer to Note 3,23, “Restructuring” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report for a discussion of restructuring charges. During 2016, we sold the shut-down Rogers facility for total proceeds of $4.3 million, resulting in a $1.4 million gain on sale. Prior to selling the facility, we incurred $1.5 million of further closure costs including carrying costsReport).

During 2015, we recorded $4.3 million in impairment of fixed assets and asset relocation costs, $2.0 million of carrying costs for the closed Rogers facility and $1.7 million in depreciation.

(4)

In the fourth quarter of 2019, we recognized goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible impairment charges totaling $102.2 million for the closed facilityour European reporting unit (refer to Note 10, “Goodwill and $0.3 million in depreciation. During 2015, the shutdown of the Rogers facility resulted in a gross margin loss of $8.0 million. We incurred $4.3 million in restructuring costs related to an impairment of fixed assets and other associated costs such as asset relocation costs. Additionally, we incurred $2.0 million of further closure costs including carrying costs for the closed facility and $1.7 million in depreciation. The Adjusted EBITDA impact of the Rogers facility closure for 2015 was $6.3 million, which includes the $4.3 million of restructuring costs and $2.0 million of carrying costs related to the closed facility. During 2014, we had $8.4 million of restructuring costs related to the closure of the Rogers facility. The carrying costs for the closed facility are not included in the restructuring line in the Consolidated Income Statements of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

(3)See Note 14, “Income Taxes”Other Intangible Assets” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report for a discussion of material items impacting the 2017, 2016 and 2015 income tax provisions.Report).

(4)(5)

Adjusted EBITDA is a key measure that is not calculated according to GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest incomeRefer to “Management’s Discussion and expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, restructuring and other closure costs, impairments of long-lived assets and investments, acquisition costs and integration costs. We use Adjusted EBITDA as an important indicator of the operating performance of our business. We use Adjusted EBITDA in internal forecasts and models when establishing internal operating budgets, supplementing the financial results and forecasts reported to our Board of Directors and evaluating short-term and long-term operating trends in our operations. We believe the Adjusted EBITDA financial measure assists in providing a more complete understanding of our underlying operational measures to manage our business, to evaluate our performance compared to prior periods and the marketplace, and to establish operational goals. We believe that thesenon-GAAP financial adjustments are useful to investors because they allow investors to evaluate the effectiveness of the methodology and information used by management in our financial and operational decision-making. Adjusted EBITDA is anon-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. Thisnon-GAAP financial measure may not be computed in the same manner as similarly titled measures used by other companies. See theAnalysis, Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresMeasures” section of this Annual Report for a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of our Adjusted EBITDA to net income.income, the most comparable GAAP measure.

(5)(6)

The current ratio is current

In 2019, we adopted ASC 842, “Leases,” the new lease accounting standard, resulting in recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets divided by current liabilities.of $18.2 million effective January 1, 2019.

(6)Return on average shareholders’ equity is net income divided by average shareholders’ equity. Average shareholders’ equity is the beginning of the year shareholders’ equity plus the end of year shareholders’ equity divided by two.

18


ITEM 7 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Please refer to the section entitled “Forward Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report immediately prior to Item 1. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to those discussed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Executive Overview

Our principal business is the design and manufacture of aluminum wheels for sale to OEMs in North America and Europe and aftermarket suppliers in Europe. We employ approximately 8,400 employees, operating in eight manufacturing facilities in North America and Europe with a combined annual manufacturing capacity of approximately 20 million wheels. We are one of the largest suppliers to global OEMs, and we believe we are the #1 North American aluminum wheel manufacturer, the #3 European aluminum wheel manufacturer and the #1 European aluminum wheel aftermarket manufacturer and supplier. Our OEM aluminum wheels accounted for approximately 9492 percent of our sales in 2019 and are primarily sold for factory installation on many vehicle models manufactured by Audi, BMW,BMW-Mini, Daimler AG Company (Mercedes-Benz, AMG, Smart), FCA, Ford, GM, Honda, Jaguar-Land Rover,Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Mazda, Nissan, PSA, Renault, Subaru, Tesla,Suzuki, Toyota, VolkswagenVW Group (Volkswagen, Audi, SEAT, Skoda, Porsche, Bentley) and Volvo. We sell aluminum wheels to the European aftermarket under the brands ATS, RIAL, ALUTEC and ANZIO. North America and Europe represent the principal markets for our products,

but we have a global presence and influence with North American, European and Asian OEMs.  With the acquisition of our European operations in 2017, we diversified our customer base from predominately North American OEMs (e.g. Ford and G.M.) to a global customer base of OEMs (e.g. Audi,Mercedes-Benz, and Toyota). The following chart demonstratesshows our sales by customer for the shiftyears ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

Globally, we shipped 19.2 million units down from 21.0 million in diversification2018, generally consistent with overall industry volume trends.  Demand for our products is mainly driven by light-vehicle production levels in North America and Europe, as well as production levels at our key customers and take rates on programs we serve. North American light-vehicle production in 2019 was 16.3 million vehicles, as compared to 17.0 million vehicles in 2018. In Europe, light vehicle production level in 2019 was 17.7 million vehicles, as compared to 18.5 million vehicles in 2018.

19


The following chart shows the comparison of our business from 2016 to 2017.operational performance in 2019, 2018 and 2017:

 

DIVERSIFICATION

 

Historically,

For the focuscalendar year 2019, sales were lower due to reduced volumes in both North America and Europe. Our 2019 Adjusted EBITDA was lower than 2018 primarily due to lower industry volumes in North America and Europe, rising energy rates, the impact of the Company was on providing wheels for relatively high-volume programs with lower degrees of competitive differentiation. In order to improve our strategic positionGM strike and better serve our customers, we are augmenting our product portfolio with wheels containing higher technical content and greater differentiation. We believe this direction is consistent with current trendslaunch challenges in the market and needs of our customers. To achieve this objective, we have invested in the past and continue to invest in new manufacturing capabilities in order to produceNorth America, partially offset by a shift toward larger more sophisticated finishes and larger diameter products, which typically provide higher value in the market. wheel diameter.

20


The acquisition of our European operations and the construction of a new finishing facility align with this strategic mission. We are in the process of constructing a physical vapor deposition PVD finishing facility, which will establish us as the first OEM automotive wheel manufacturer to have this capabilityin-house. PVDfollowing table is a wheel coating process that creates bright chrome-like surfaces in an environmentally friendly manner.

As a resultsummary of the acquisition of the European operations on May 30, 2017, we have broadened our product portfolioCompany’s operating results for 2019, 2018 and acquired a significant customer share with European OEMs, including Audi, Jaguar-Land Rover, Mercedes Benz and Volvo. The acquisition is not only complementary in terms of customers, market coverage and product offerings but also very much aligned with our strategic direction with a priority focus on larger diameter wheels, premium finishes, luxury brands and specialty wheels for high performance motorsport racing vehicles, all providing enhanced opportunity for higher margin business. With the acquisition, our global reach encompasses sales to nine of the ten largest OEMs in the world with sales surpassing $1.1 billion. The following charts show sales by major customer. The sales to our top four customers in 2017 represented 59 percent of total sales compared to 88 percent in 2016.

SALES BY CUSTOMER

Net sales in 2017 increased 51 percent to $1,108.1 million from $733 million in 2016 due to the inclusion of seven months of our European operations. Our North American sales were $732 million and $733 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively. During 2017, we incurred $44.3 million in nonrecurring costs related to the acquisition of Uniwheels and integration of our European business with our North American operations. Excluding the nonrecurring costs, our income from operations improved compared to last year due to the inclusion of the seven months of European operations. We anticipate incurring further integration costs in 2018 to complete the integration of the two companies. The following charts show the impact of the nonrecurring costs on our 2017 operating results.

SALES AND PROFITABILITY

*  Income from operations in 2017 includes$44.3 million in costs related to acquisition costs and integration costs.

*  See the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section of this annual report for a reconciliation of our Adjusted EBIDA to income from operations.

Our current year income from operations decreased while our Adjusted EBITDA increased. Income from operations decreased in 2017 to $21.5 million from $54.6 million in 2016 due to $44.3 million of nonrecurring expenses related to the acquisition of Uniwheels and integration of our European business. Our Adjusted EBITDA increased to $140.1 million in 2017 from $88.5 million in 2016. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was driven by the inclusion of $61.0 million from our new European operations. On a comparable basis the North American Adjusted EBITDA decreased from $88.5 in 2016 to $79.1 million in 2017 due to lower volumes and Mexican operational inefficiencies.

Overall North American production of passenger cars and light-duty trucks in 2017 was reported by industry publications as decreasing by 4.7 percent versus 2016 with production of light-duty trucks, which includespick-up trucks, SUVs, vans and “crossover vehicles,” increasing 2.1 percent and production of passenger cars decreasing 15.8 percent. While North American production was a solid 17.0 million this year, it did decrease for

the first time since 2009. The decrease in sales is driven by a shift in consumer demand away from passenger cars to crossover vehicles and used vehicles. Superior North America unit sales followed the industry decline with a sales decrease of 6.4 percent in 2017 due to a 21.4 percent decline in passenger cars offset by 1.0 percent increase in light-duty trucks. In 2017, we had decreased sales with our North American OEM customers offset by increased sales with Nissan and other international customers.

Overall European new vehicle production of passenger cars and light-duty trucks in 2017 were reported by industry publications as increasing 0.3 percent versus 2016. This was the fourth consecutive annual increase in European new vehicle registrations. Germany, UK, France, Italy and Spain remained the five largest car markets in Europe for 2017. Germany, France, Italy and Spain new vehicle registrations increased in 2017 while the UK experienced a decrease in the current year. From an OEM perspective, European sales increased in 2017 for Renault, Peugeot, Mercedes and FIAT, partially offset by slight decreases in Volkswagen, Audi, Opel and Ford. Our 2017 European operation sales increased at a rate higher than the industry. Unit sales for the last seven months of 2017 increased by 6.2 percent over the same time period in 2016 due to favorable market conditions.2017:

Results of Operations

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

  2017 2016   2015 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

(Thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Sales

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

  $732,418  $732,677   $727,946 

 

$

704,320

 

 

$

800,383

 

 

$

732,418

 

Europe

   375,637   —      —   

 

 

668,167

 

 

 

701,444

 

 

 

375,637

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Net sales

   1,108,055  732,677    727,946 

 

 

1,372,487

 

 

 

1,501,827

 

 

 

1,108,055

 

Cost of sales

   1,005,158  646,473    656,729 

 

 

(1,256,425

)

 

 

1,338,300

 

 

 

1,005,158

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Gross profit

   102,897  86,204    71,217 

 

 

116,062

 

 

 

163,527

 

 

 

102,897

 

Percentage of net sales

   9.3 11.8   9.8

 

 

8.5

%

 

 

10.9

%

 

 

9.3

%

Selling, general and administrative

   81,379  31,602    34,923 

 

 

63,883

 

 

 

77,722

 

 

 

81,379

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Income from operations

   21,518  54,602    36,294 

Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles

 

 

102,238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

 

 

(50,059

)

 

 

85,805

 

 

 

21,518

 

Percentage of net sales

   1.9 7.5   5.0

 

 

(3.6

)%

 

 

5.7

%

 

 

1.9

%

Interest (expense) income, net

   (40,004 245    103 

Other income (expense), net

   13,188  (126   (1,114

Interest expense, net

 

 

(47,011

)

 

 

(50,097

)

 

 

(40,004

)

Other (expense) income, net

 

 

4,815

 

 

 

(6,936

)

 

 

13,188

 

Change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative

   6,164   —      —   

 

 

(782

)

 

 

3,480

 

 

 

6,164

 

Income tax benefit (provision)

   (6,875 (13,340   (11,339
  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Consolidated net income

   (6,009 41,381    23,944 

Income tax provision

 

 

(3,423

)

 

 

(6,291

)

 

 

(6,875

)

Consolidated net income (loss)

 

 

(96,460

)

 

 

25,961

 

 

 

(6,009

)

Less: net loss attributable tonon-controlling interests

   (194  —      —   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(194

)

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Net income attributable to Superior

   (6,203 41,381    23,944 

Net income (loss) attributable to Superior

 

 

(96,460

)

 

 

25,961

 

 

 

(6,203

)

Percentage of net sales

   (0.6)%  5.6   3.3

 

 

(7.0

)%

 

 

1.7

%

 

 

(0.6

)%

Diluted (loss) earnings per share

  $(1.01 $1.62   $0.90 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

$

(5.10

)

 

$

0.29

 

 

$

(1.01

)

Value added sales(1)

   616,753  408,690    360,846 

 

$

755,325

 

 

$

797,187

 

 

$

616,753

 

Adjusted EBITDA(2)

  $140,085  $88,511   $76,053 

 

$

168,795

 

 

$

185,623

 

 

$

140,085

 

Percentage of net sales(3)

   12.6 12.1   10.4

Percentage of value added sales(4)

   22.7 21.7   21.1

Percentage of net sales

 

 

12.3

%

 

 

12.4

%

 

 

12.6

%

Percentage of value added sales

 

 

22.3

%

 

 

23.3

%

 

 

22.7

%

Unit shipments in thousands

   17,008  12,260    11,244 

 

 

19,246

 

 

 

20,991

 

 

 

17,008

 

 

(1)

Value added sales is a key measure that is not calculated according to GAAP. In the discussion of operating results, we provide information regarding value added sales. Value added sales represents net sales less the value of aluminumRefer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and services provided by outside service providers that are included in net sales. As discussed further below, arrangements with our customers allow us to pass on changes in aluminum prices and outside service provider costs; therefore, fluctuations in underlying aluminum prices and the use of outside service providers generally do not directly impact our profitability. Accordingly, value added sales is worthy

of being highlighted for the benefit of users of our financial statements. Our intent is to allow users of the financial statements to consider our net sales information both with and without the aluminum and outside service provider cost components thereof. Management utilizes value added sales as a key metric to determine growth of the company because it eliminates the volatility of aluminum prices. See theAnalysis, Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresMeasures” section of this Annual Report for a definition of value added sales and a reconciliation of value added sales to net sales.sales, the most comparable GAAP measure.

(2)

Adjusted EBITDA is a key measure that is not calculated according to GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest incomeRefer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, restructuring and other closure costs, impairments of long-lived assets and investments, acquisition costs and integration costs. We use Adjusted EBITDA as an important indicator of the operating performance of our business. We use Adjusted EBITDA in internal financial forecasts and models when establishing internal operating budgets, supplementing the financial results and forecasts reported to our Board of Directors and evaluating short-term and long-term operating trends in our operations. We believe the Adjusted EBITDA financial measure assists in providing a more complete understanding of our underlying operational measures to manage our business, to evaluate our performance compared to prior periods and the marketplace and to establish operational goals. We believe that thesenon-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors because they allow investors to evaluate the effectiveness of the methodology and information used by management in our financial and operational decision-making. Adjusted EBITDA is anon-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. Thisnon-GAAP financial measure may not be computed in the same manner as similarly titled measures used by other companies. See theAnalysis, Non-GAAP Financial MeasuresMeasures” section of this Annual Report for a definition of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of our Adjusted EBITDA to net income.

(3)Adjusted EBITDA: Percentage of net sales is a key measure that is not calculated according to GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net sales is defined as Adjusted EBITDA divided by net sales. See theNon-GAAP Financial Measures section of this Annual Report for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA.
(4)Adjusted EBITDA: Percentage of value added sales is a key measure that is not calculated according to GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of value added sales is defined as Adjusted EBITDA divided by value added sales. See theNon-GAAP Financial Measures section of this Annual Report for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA and value added sales.

20172019 versus 20162018

Shipments

Wheel unit shipments were 19.2 million for 2019, compared to unit shipments of 21.0 million in the prior year, a decrease of 8.3 percent. The decrease occurred primarily in our North American operations and was driven by softer industry production levels, lower production at our key customers, including the impact of the UAW labor strike at General Motors, and lower take rates on the programs we serve.

Net Sales

Net salesforsales for 2019 were $1,372.5 million, compared to net sales of $1,501.8 million for the same period in 2018.  The reduction in net sales is primarily driven by reduced volumes, lower aluminum prices in both North America and Europe, and a weaker Euro, partially offset by improved product mix comprised of larger diameter wheels and premium finishes in both regions.

21


Cost of Sales

Cost of sales were $1,256.4 million in 2019, compared to $1,338.3 million in the prior year period. The decrease in cost of sales was due primarily due to lower volumes, lower aluminum prices, and a weaker Euro partially offset by higher aluminum content associated with larger diameter wheels and $14.8 million of restructuring and relocation costs related to our Fayetteville, Arkansas manufacturing location.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2019 were $63.9 million, or 4.7 percent of net sales, compared to $77.7 million, or 5.2 percent of net sales for the same period in 2018.  The decrease is primarily due to a reduction in acquisition and integration expenses and the alignment of reporting for SG&A between our North American and European operations.

Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangibles

In 2019 we recognized a goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles impairment charge of $102.2 million relating to our European reporting unit (refer to Note 10, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report).

Net Interest Expense

Net interest expense for 2019 was $47.0 million, compared to interest expense of $50.1 million in 2018. The reduction in interest expense was primarily due to the 2018 repricing of the Company’s $400.0 million Senior Secured Term Loan Facility (“Term Loan Facility”), the early extinguishment of a portion of the 6% Senior Notes due June 15, 2025 (“Notes”) in 2019 and decreased loan reference rates, primarily US Dollar LIBOR rates.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income was $4.8 million in 2019, compared with other expense of $(6.9) million in 2018. The increase in other income was primarily driven by a $3.7 million gain on the early extinguishment of a portion of the Notes in 2019 and a foreign exchange gain in 2019 versus a foreign exchange loss in 2018.  

Change in Fair Value of Embedded Derivative Liability

During 2019, the redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative liability associated with the conversion and the early redemption options increased $0.8 million to $3.9 million primarily due to higher volatility and lower dividend assumptions with the respect to the conversion option and a shorter expected time horizon with respect to the redemption option.

Income Tax Provision

The income tax provision for 2019 was $3.4 million on pre-tax loss of $93.0 million, representing an effective tax rate of (3.7) percent. The effective tax rate was lower than the statutory rate primarily due to the effects of U.S. taxation on foreign earnings under Global Intangible Low-Tax Income (GILTI) provisions of tax reform, goodwill impairment in Germany offset by a favorable split of jurisdictional pre-tax income, and the generation of a new polish SEZ Credit. The income tax provision for 2018 was $6.3 million on pre-tax earnings of $32.3 million, representing an effective income tax rate of 19.5 percent.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Superior

Net loss attributable to Superior in 2019 was $(96.5) million, or a loss of $(5.10) per diluted share, compared to net income attributable to Superior of $26.0 million, or an earnings per diluted share of $0.29, in 2018.

22


Segment Sales and Income from Operations

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

Change

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

 

$

704,320

 

 

$

800,383

 

 

$

(96,063

)

Europe

 

 

668,167

 

 

 

701,444

 

 

 

(33,277

)

Total net sales

 

$

1,372,487

 

 

$

1,501,827

 

 

$

(129,340

)

Income (loss) from Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

 

$

16,713

 

 

$

29,702

 

 

$

(12,989

)

Europe

 

 

(66,772

)

 

 

56,103

 

 

 

(122,875

)

Total income from operations

 

$

(50,059

)

 

$

85,805

 

 

$

(135,864

)

North America

In 2019, net sales of our North America segment decreased 12.0 percent, compared to 2018, primarily due to a 13.2 percent decrease in volumes, including the impact of the UAW labor strike at General Motors, and lower aluminum prices, partially offset by improved product mix comprised of larger diameter wheels and premium wheel finishes. The decline in unit shipments was primarily due to lower sales to Ford, Nissan, Toyota and FCA. U.S. and Mexico sales as a percentage of North American total sales were approximately 14.8 percent and 85.2 percent, respectively, during 2019, which compares to 15.9 percent and 84.1 percent for 2018. North American segment income from operations decreased in 2019 due primarily to a decrease in volumes and restructuring and relocation costs related to our Fayetteville, Arkansas facility, partially offset by favorable procurement savings, product mix and foreign exchange.

Europe

Net sales of our European segment for 2019 decreased 4.7 percent, compared to 2018, primarily due to a weaker Euro, lower aluminum prices and lower volume, partially offset by improved product mix comprised of larger diameter wheels and premium wheel finishes. Sales in Germany and Poland as a percentage of total European segment sales were approximately 36.8 percent and 63.2 percent, respectively, during 2019, which compares to 39.9 percent and 60.1 percent for 2018. European segment income from operations for the year ended 2019 decreased primarily due to a $102.2 million charge for impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles.  Additionally, segment income was lower due to reduced cost performance related to higher energy costs, lower volumes and negative foreign exchange effects from the Euro, which was partially offset by favorable mix.

2018 versus 2017 increased $375.4

Shipments

Wheel unit shipments were 21 million over 2016for 2018, an increase of 23.4 percent, compared to unit shipments of 17 million in the prior year period. The increase in unit shipments was primarily due to the inclusion of sevenan additional five months of the European operation’s units, which drove 4.2 million units of improvement.

Net Sales

Net sales for 2018 were $1,501.8 million, compared to net sales of our European operations. Overall unit shipments increased$1,108.1 million in the current year to 17.0 million from 12.3 million, an2017. The increase of 38.2 percent, which was driven by the additioninclusion of seven months’ unit sales foran additional five months of our newly acquired European operations. Net sales were also favorably impacted by anoperations, which contributed $305.0 million of the increase. Additionally, a 9.8 percent increase in the value of the aluminum component of sales, which we generally pass through to our customers. The North Americanglobal average selling price per wheel increased by 6.8 percent during 2017contributed $89.0 million of the sales increase, due to increases in comparison to 2016 due mainly to favorablealuminum prices and improved product mix with a higher percentagecomprised of larger diameter wheels and the increase in aluminum prices.premium finishes.

As a result of the acquisition of Uniwheels in 2017, our major customer mix of shipments became more diversified as shown below:

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

  2017  2016  2015 

Ford

   22  36  42

GM

   20  29  25

Toyota

   9  14  14

Other international customers

   49  21  19
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   100  100  100
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales increased significantlywere $1,338.3 million in 20172018 compared to $1,005.2 million in the prior year period. The increase in cost of sales was due mainly to $263.0 million associated with the inclusion of sevenan additional five months of costs of our newly acquiredthe European operations. In addition, an increase in aluminum costs resulted in higherAdditionally, cost of sales increased due to higher aluminum prices and increased manufacturing costs associated with larger diameter wheels, energy rates in ourMexico and launch costs in North American operations, which is typically passed through to the customer.America.

23


Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses also increased significantlyfor 2018 were $77.7 million, or 5.2 percent of net sales, compared to $81.4 million, or 7.3 percent of net sales in 2017 in comparison to 20162017. The decrease as a percentage of sales is due to the inclusion$22.4 million of seven months of our European operations and $32.1 million ofreduced acquisition and integration expenses related to the acquisition of Uniwheels.expenses.

Net Interest Expense

Net interest expense for 20172018 was $50.1 million and $40.0 million while the company recognized $0.2 million of net interest income in 2016. Interest expense increased in 2017for 2017. The increase is due to the new debt issued to financefull year of interest on the acquisition of Uniwheels.debt in 2018, partially offset by a non-recurring interest cost related to the bridge loan financing for the European business acquisition incurred in 2017.

Net Other (Expense) Income

Net other incomeexpense was $13.2$(6.9) million in 20172018 compared with net other expenseincome of $0.1$13.2 million in 2016.2017. The significant increasechange was primarily due in part to foreign exchange losses of $(1.0) million in 2018 compared to gains of $12.9 million in 2017 (includingand $2.2 million to year-over-year changes in derivative contracts. The remaining items were of an acquisition-related foreign exchange gain of $8.2 million), as compared to foreign exchange losses of $0.4 million in 2016. We also recognized a $0.5 million gain on sale of our minority interest in Synergies Casting Limited, a private aluminum wheel manufacturer based in Visakhapatnam, Indiaindividually insignificant nature. 

Change in Fair Value of Embedded Derivative Liability

During 2018 and 2017, we recognized a $3.5 million and $6.2 million change in the fair value of our redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative liability. The beginning fair value of the embedded derivative liability, was measured as of the date of issuance, May 22, 2017. During the third and fourth quarter, the fair value of the embedded derivative liability decreased,respectively, primarily due to the declinedeclines in our stock price.price experienced in the respective years.

Income Tax Provision

The income tax provision for 2018 was $6.3 million on pre-tax income of $32.3 million primarily due to the split of jurisdictional pre-tax income or loss and finalizing 2017 provisional amounts recorded for the enactment-date-effects of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“the Act”). The income tax provision for 2017 was $6.9 million on apre-tax income of $0.9 million due primarily to the split of jurisdictionalpre-tax income or loss, certainnon-deductible acquisition costs related to the Uniwheels acquisition, and provisional estimates recorded for the transition tax on offshore earnings and a deferred tax expense. The deferred tax expense resulted from the reduction of our deferred tax assets due to the change in the statutory federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% for years subsequent to 2017, based on the newly enacted U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“The Act”). The income tax provision for 2016 was $13.3 million, representing an effective income tax rate of 24.4 percent. The effective tax rate for 2016 was lower than the statutory rate due to earnings in countries with tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory rate.rate, acquisition costs and the effects of the Act.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Superior

Net lossincome attributable to Superior in 20172018 was $6.2$26.0 million, or a loss of $1.01$0.29 per diluted share, compared to a net incomeloss in 20162017 of $41.4$(6.2) million, or $1.62$(1.01) loss per diluted share. The decrease in 2017 diluted per share was mainly driven by the acquisition costs, integration costs, interest expense, accretion on preferred equity, and the dividends that were issued to the preferred equity holder.

Segment Sales and Income from Operations

 

  Year Ended
December 31,
   

 

 

 

Year Ended

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

  2017   2016   Change 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

Change

 

(Dollars in thousands)            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected data

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Sales

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

  $732,418   $732,677   $(259

 

$

800,383

 

 

$

732,418

 

 

$

67,965

 

Europe

   375,637    —      375,637 

 

 

701,444

 

 

 

375,637

 

 

 

325,807

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total net sales

  $1,108,055   $732,677   $375,378 

 

$

1,501,827

 

 

$

1,108,055

 

 

$

393,772

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income (loss) from Operations

      

Income from Operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

  $9,808   $54,602   $(44,794

 

$

29,702

 

 

$

9,808

 

 

$

19,894

 

Europe

   11,710    —      11,710 

 

 

56,103

 

 

 

11,710

 

 

 

44,393

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total income from operations

  $21,518   $54,602   $(33,084

 

$

85,805

 

 

$

21,518

 

 

$

64,287

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

North America

Due to the acquisition of our European operations on May 30, 2017, we will provide geographical segment analysis for the 2017 and 2016 results of operations discussion and analysis rather than the geographical discussion that was provided in 2016 and 2015. In 2017,2018, net sales of our North America segment remained at a consistent level despite a 6.4increased 9.3 percent decrease in volume due to a 6.8an 11.1 percent increase in average unit selling price. Unit shipments declined from 12.3 million in 2016 to 11.5 million in 2017 resulting in a $47.0 million reduction in revenue which was fully offset by the increase in average selling price. The decline in volume resulted from lower unit sales with Ford, GM and FCA,price per wheel partially offset by increased sales at Nissan and Subaru.a 1.7 percent decrease in volumes. The increase in average selling price per wheel, contributed $81.5 million, and was driven by an increase in the value of thehigher aluminum component of sales,pricing, which we generally pass through to our customers, and our value added sales.improved product mix comprised of larger diameter wheels and premium finishes. Unit shipments declined from 11.5 million in 2017 to 11.3 million in 2018 resulting in a $12.2 million reduction in revenue. The splitdecline in unit shipments was primarily due to lower sales to Ford, FCA, BMW and Subaru, partially offset by increased sales to GM. North American segment sales between U.S. and Mexico sales were approximately 15.9 percent and 84.1 percent, respectively during 2018, which compares to 17.0 percent and 83.0 percent respectively during 2017, which compares to 16.4 percent and 83.6 percent for 2016.

2017. The North America

24


segment income from operations decreasedincreased in 20172018 due primarily to nonrecurringlower integration costs and production inefficiencies. During 2017, the company incurred $29.5 million of additional costs relating to the acquisitionfavorable product mix, partially offset by increased launch and integration of the European operations. We continued to invest in our machinery through higher levels of maintenance than in past years to alleviate the production issues that we have experienced since the second quarter of 2016.energy costs.

Europe

We acquired the Uniwheels business on May 30, 2017, which comprises our European operations. As a result, we have included seven monthsIn 2018, net sales of our European operations in our consolidated statement of operations for 2017. The European operations salessegment increased over the same seven-month period last year by 18.6 percent. Income from operations for this period included purchase accounting adjustments of $14.8 million related86.7 percent primarily due to inventory, and other expenses related to the acquisition and integration of the business.

2016 versus 2015

Net Sales

Net sales in 2016 increased $4.8 million to $732.7 million from $727.9 million in 2015. Wheel shipments increased by 9 percent in 2016 compared to 2015 resulting in $60.8 million higher sales compared to 2015. Net sales were unfavorably impacted by a decline in the value of the aluminum componentan additional five months of sales, which we

generally pass through to our customers and resulted in $61.5contributed $283.3 million, lower revenues. The average selling price of our wheels decreased 8 percent due to the unfavorable impact of the decline in aluminum value. Increases in unit shipments to GM, Nissan, Toyota and Subaru were partially offset by decreases in unit shipments to Ford and FCA. Wheel program development revenues totaled $10.0 million in 2016 and $6.9 million in 2015.

U.S. Operations

Net sales of our U.S. plants in 2016 decreased 32 percent, to $120.4 million from $177.2 million in 2015, reflecting a decrease in unit shipments and a decrease6.5 percent increase in the average selling price of our wheels. Unit shipments from our U.S. plants decreased 28 percentper wheel. The increase in 2016, primarily reflecting the reallocation of production volume to our plants in Mexico. The decline in volume resulted in $50.5 million lower sales. The average selling price of our wheels decreased 7 percent primarily due to the decline in the value of the aluminum component coupled with the mix ofper wheel, sizes and finishes sold. The lower aluminum value decreased revenues by approximately $9.4 million when compared to 2015.

Mexico Operations

Net sales of our Mexico plants in 2016 increased 11 percent, to $612.3 million from $550.7 million in 2015, reflecting a 20 percent increase in unit shipments offset partially by an 8 percent decrease in the average selling prices of our wheels. The unit shipment volume increase in 2016 resulted in $111.3 million higher sales. The 8 percent decrease in the average selling price of our wheels was primarily a result of the lower pass-through price of aluminum partially offset by a favorable mix of wheel sizes and finishes sold. The lower aluminum value decreased revenues by approximately $52.1 million when compared to 2015.

Our major customer mix, based on unit shipments, is shown below:

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

  2016  2015  2014 

Ford

   36  42  42

GM

   29  25  24

Toyota

   14  14  12

FCA

   6  8  10

Other international customers

   15  11  12
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   100  100  100
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

According toWard’s Auto Info Bank, overall North American production of passenger cars and light-duty trucks in 2016 increased approximately 3 percent, while production of the specific passenger car and light-duty truck programs using our wheels increased 1 percent. In contrast to the overall market, our total shipments increased by 9 percent, resulting in our share of the North American aluminum wheel market increasing by 1 percentage point on a year-over-year basis. The increase in market share was 4 percentage points in passenger car programs, offset by a 3 percentage point decline in light-duty trucks.

Cost of Sales

In 2016, our consolidated cost of goods sold decreased $10.2 million to $646.5 million, or 88 percent of net sales, compared to $656.7 million, or 90 percent of net sales, in 2015. Cost of sales in 2016 primarily reflects a decline in aluminum prices of approximately $53.8 million, which we generally pass through to our customers, offset by an increase in freight, maintenance and supply costs. Freight costs increased $16.4 million to $20.4 million in 2016, compared to $4.0 million in 2015 due mainly to expedited shipments of approximately $13 million to customers arising from the operating inefficiencies discussed in the executive overview section. Repair and maintenance costs increased $4.3 million and supply costs increased $3.4 million in 2016 when compared to 2015. Cost of sales associated with corporate services such as engineering support for wheel program development and manufacturing support increased $2.4 million in 2016 when compared to 2015 primarily due topre-production charges incurred on new product platforms and increased compensation costs.

U.S. Operations

Cost of sales for our U.S. operations decreased in 2016 by $61.6 million, or 30 percent when compared to 2015. The 2016 decline in cost of sales for our U.S. plant primarily reflects the effect of reallocating production volume to our Mexico facilities which resulted in a 28 percent decline in unit shipments and the reduction of labor and aluminum costs by $6.1 million and $10.9 million, respectively, when compared to 2015. Lower aluminum prices also contributed to the decline.

Mexico Operations

Cost of sales for our Mexico operations increased by $51.4 million in 2016 when compared to 2015, which is mainly driven by a 20 percent increase in wheel shipments. During 2016, plant labor and benefit costs, including overtime premiums, increased approximately $4.6 million, primarily as a result of higher average headcount and wage increases. Direct material and contract labor costs increased approximately $1.9 million from 2015 primarily due to the 20 percent rise in unit shipments. The increase in direct material costs was more than offset by a decrease of approximately $42.9 million of aluminum purchase costspricing, which we generally pass through to our customers. Depreciation increased $0.8 million in 2016 comparedEuropean segment sales between Germany and Poland were approximately 39.9 percent and 60.1 percent, respectively, during 2018, which compares to 2015. Supply41.3 percent and small tool costs increased $4.5 million and plant repair and maintenance expenses increased $4.9 million in 2016 compared to 2015.

Gross Profit

Consolidated gross profit increased $15.0 million to $86.2 million, or 1258.7 percent of net sales, compared to $71.2 million, or 10 percent of net sales, last year. The increase in gross profit primarily reflects the favorable impact of the 9 percent increase in unit shipments and cost reduction resulting from the shift in manufacturing from our U.S. facility to facilities in Mexico. Partially offsetting the increase in gross profit were operating inefficiencies incurred in one of our manufacturing facilities in the last six months of 2016.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $31.6 million, or 4 percent of net sales, in 2016 compared to $34.9 million, or 5 percent of net sales, in 2015. The 2016 decrease is primarily attributable to a $1.4 million gain on sale of the Rogers facility in the last quarter of 2016, a $1.0 million reduction of severance costs and a $1.4 million decline in compensation and employee benefit costs.

Income from Operations

Consolidatedfor 2017. European segment income from operations for the year ended 2018 increased $18.3 million in 2016 to $54.6 million, or 7 percent of netconsistent with increasing sales, from $36.3 million, or 5 percent of net sales, in 2015.

Consolidated income from operations in 2016 was favorably impacted by a 9 percent increase in unit shipments, which was partially offset by operating inefficiencies incurred in one of our manufacturing facilities as more fully explained in the cost of sales discussion above.

U.S. Operations

Operating income from our U.S. operations for 2016 increased by $5.5 million compared to 2015. Operating income increased in 2016 as improved cost performance offset the impact of a 28 percent decrease in unit shipments. The overall cost improvement resulted from improved productivity, as well as lower supply and repair and maintenance costs. However, the lower production levels had an unfavorable impact on operating income due to lower absorption of fixed overhead costsa reduction in 2016 when compared to 2015.

Mexico Operations

Operating incomeintegration related expenses from our Mexico operations increased by $12.8$14.8 million in 2016 compared2017 to 2015 and reflects a $12.5 million increase in gross profit in 2016. The increase in gross profit primarily reflects a 20 percent increase in unit shipments and a favorable mix of wheel sizes and finishes sold, when compared to 2015.

U.S. versus Mexico Production

During 2016, wheels produced by our Mexico and U.S. operations accounted for 86 percent and 14 percent, respectively, of our total production. During 2015, wheels produced by our Mexico and U.S. operations accounted for 78 percent and 22 percent, respectively, of our total production.

Interest Income, net and Other Income (Expense), net

Net interest income was $0.2 million and $0.1$2.4 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively due to the increase in the average cash balance which was mainly related to the increase in operating income.2018.

Net other income (expense) was expense of $0.1 million and $1.1 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Also included in other income (expense) net are foreign exchange losses of $0.4 million and $1.2 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Effective Income Tax Rate

Our income before income taxes was $54.7 million in 2016 and $35.3 million in 2015. The effective tax rate on the 2016 pretax income was 24.4 percent compared to 32.1 percent in 2015.

The 2016 effective income tax rate was 24.4 percent. The effective tax rate was lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily as a result of income in jurisdictions where the statutory rate is lower than the U.S. rate and tax benefits due to the release of tax liabilities related to uncertain tax positions as a result of settlements with various tax jurisdictions.

Our effective income tax rate for 2015 was 32.1 percent. The effective tax rate was lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily as a result of net decreases in the liability for uncertain tax positions partially offset by the reversal of deferred tax assets related to stock based compensation.

Net Income

Net income in 2016 was $41.4 million, or 6 percent of net sales compared to $23.9 million, or 3 percent of net sales in 2015. Earnings per share were $1.62 and $0.90 per diluted share in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our sources of liquidity primarily include cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, net cash provided by operating activities, our senior notes and borrowings under available debt facilities, factoring arrangements for trade receivables and, from time to time, other external sources of funds. Working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) and our current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) were $222.3$163.1 million and 1.9, respectively, at December 31, 2019, versus $192.0 million and 2.1:1 respectively, at December 31, 2017, versus $168.1 million and 3.0:1 at December 31, 2016.2018. As of December 31, 2017,2019, our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $47.1$77.9 million compared to $58.5$48.2 million at December 31, 2016. The 2017 increase in working capital resulted primarily from the acquisition of Uniwheels.2018.

Our working capital requirements, investing activities and cash dividend payments have historically have been funded from internally generated funds, or existing cash,debt facilities, cash equivalents and short-term investments, and we believe these sources will continue to meet our   capital requirements, in the foreseeable future. Our workingas well as our currently anticipated short-term needs. Capital expenditures consist of ongoing maintenance and operational improvements (“maintenance”), as well as capital decreased in 2017, primarily due to an increase in accounts payable related to timingnew product offerings and expanded capacity for existing products (“new business”). Over time capital expenditures have consisted of payments.roughly equal components of maintenance and new business, the most significant of which in recent years has been our investment in physical vapor deposition (PVD) technology which went into production in 2019.      

In connection with the acquisition of Uniwheels,our European business, we entered into several debt and equity financing arrangements during 2017. On March 22, 2017, we entered into a senior secured credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”USD Senior Secured Credit facility (“USD SSCF”) with Citibank, N.A, JP Morgan Chase N.A., Royal Bank of Canada and Deutsche Bank A.G. New York Branch (collectively, the “Lenders”). The Credit Agreement consistsconsisting of a $400.0 million senior secured term loan facility (the “TermSenior Secured Term Loan Facility (“Term Loan Facility”) and a $160.0 million revolving credit facility.facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”). On May 22, 2017, we issued 140,202150,000 shares of Series A redeemable preferred stock and 9,798 shares of Series B redeemable preferred stock to TPG Superior and TPG Growth III Sidewall, L.P. (“TPG”) for an aggregate purchase price of $150.0 million. On June 15, 2017, we issued €250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.00%6% Senior Notes (the “Notes”) due June 15, 2025.2025 (“Notes”). In addition, as a part of the Uniwheelsour European business acquisition, we assumed $70.7 million of outstanding debt. At

During the second quarter of 2019, the Company amended the EUR Senior Secured Credit Facility (“EUR SSCF”), our European revolving credit facility, increasing the available borrowing limit from 30.0 million Euro to 45.0 million Euro and extending the term to May 22, 2022. In addition, the European business entered into equipment loan agreements totaling $13.4 million (12.0 million Euro) in the fourth quarter of 2019, but the Company had not drawn down on the loans as of December 31, 2017, balances2019. On January 1, 2020, the available borrowing limit of the EUR SSCF was increased from 45.0 million Euro to 60.0 million Euro. All other terms of the EUR SSCF remained unchanged.

Balances outstanding under the Term Loan Facility, Notes, and an equipment loan as of December 31, 2019 were $386.8$371.8 million, $300.3$243.1 million, and $20.8$12.7 million, respectively. Unused commitmentsThe redeemable preferred stock balance issued to TPG amounted to $161.0 million as of December 31, 2019. There was no balance outstanding under the revolving credit facilityRevolving Credit Facility of the USD SSCF at December 31, 2019 and unused commitments were $157.2 million and$156.4 million. In addition, there was 30.044.6 million Euro available under a Uniwheels line of creditour EUR SSCF as of December 31, 2017.2019. Cash and funds available under credit facilities were $284.2 million at December 31, 2019.   

As part of our commitment to enhancing shareholder value, we have engaged in repurchases of our common stock from time to time. In October 2014, ourOn September 3, 2019, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approveddetermined to suspend the 2014 Repurchase Program, authorizing the repurchase of up to $30.0 million of ourCompany’s quarterly common stock. The 2014 Repurchase Program was completed in January 2016, with purchases from October 2014 to January 2016 of 1,642,924 shares for a cost of $30.0 million. In January 2016, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of common stock under the 2016 Repurchase Program. Under the 2016 Repurchase Program, we may repurchase common stock from time to time on the open market or in private transactions. During 2016, we repurchased 454,718 shares of company stock at a cost of $10.4 million under the 2016 Repurchase Program. During 2017, we purchased an additional 215,841 shares of company stock at a cost of $5.0 million under the 2016 Repurchase Program. The timing and extent of the repurchases under the 2016 Repurchase Program will depend upon market conditions and other corporate considerations in our sole discretion.dividend.

25


The following table summarizes the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities as reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

  2017   2016   2015 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

(Thousands of dollars)            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $63,710   $78,491   $59,349 

 

$

162,842

 

 

$

156,116

 

 

$

63,710

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (777,614   (35,038   (34,946

 

 

(54,663

)

 

 

(77,097

)

 

 

(777,614

)

Net cash used in financing activities

   701,107    (37,327   (31,348

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

(76,599

)

 

 

(76,338

)

 

 

701,107

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

   1,371    (376   (3,470

 

 

(1,117

)

 

 

(1,577

)

 

 

1,371

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  $(11,426  $5,750   $(10,415
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

$

30,463

 

 

$

1,104

 

 

$

(11,426

)

2017

2019 versus 20162018

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $63.7$162.8 million in 2017,2019 compared to net$156.1 million in 2018. The year-over-year increase in operating cash flow is primarily due to improved working capital management. The reduction in inventory was driven by lower production volumes and aluminum prices. The increase in payables due to improved terms with aluminum suppliers was largely offset by the lower year-over-year reduction in accounts receivable.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $54.7 million in 2019 compared to $77.1 million in 2018. The decline in cash used in investing activities in 2019 was due to the year-over-year reduction in capital expenditures, as well as cash proceeds received upon sale of other assets in 2019.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $76.6 million compared to $76.3 million in 2018. The modest increase in cash used in financing activities was due to prepayments on the term loan and early extinguishment of the 6% Notes in 2019, substantially offset by lower purchases of non-controlling redeemable shares and, to a lesser extent, lower cash dividends largely due to suspension of the common share dividend in the third quarter of 2019.

2018 versus 2017

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities of $78.5was $156.1 million for 2016.in 2018 and $63.7 million in 2017. The decreaseincrease in cash flow provided by operating activities was mainly due to lower net income primarily duethe inclusion of a full year of our European operations as compared to seven months in 2017, improved working capital management and the acquisitionintroduction of Uniwheels and integration related fees, and an increasea receivables factoring program in inventory partially offset by increasesNorth America, which generated $30.1 million of operating cash flows in trade payables.the year.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $77.1 million in 2018 compared to $777.6 million in 2017 compared to $35.0 million in 2016.2017. Net cash used in investing activities was higher in 2017 primarily due to the Uniwheels acquisition.

our European business acquisition in 2017.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $76.3 million compared to net cash provided by financing activities wasof $701.1 million in 2017 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $37.3 million in 2017. Net cash provided by financing activities was higher in 2017 due to the issuance of debt issued to finance the UniwheelsEuropean business acquisition.

2016 versus 201526

Our liquidity remained strong in 2016. Working capital (current assets minus current liabilities) and our current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) were $168.1 million and 3.0:1, respectively, at December 31, 2016, versus $172.0 million and 3.3:1 at December 31, 2015. The 2016 decrease in working capital resulted primarily from an increase in accounts payable related to timing of payments which was partially offset by an increase in inventory. We generate our principal working capital resources primarily through operations. The increase in cash from working capital in 2016 primarily reflects a significant increase in net income and an increase in accounts payable offset by increased inventories. Assuming continuation of our historically strong liquidity, which includes funds available under our revolving credit facility, we believe we are well positioned to take advantage of new and complementary business opportunities, and to fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the foreseeable future.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $19.1 million to $78.5 million for 2016, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $59.3 million for 2015. The increase in operating activities relates primarily to the $17.4 million increase in net income. Additional sources of cash flow related to a $15.9 million increase in accounts payable and an $8.0 million decrease in accounts receivable. Offsetting amounts were cash flow uses of $22.3 million increase in inventories and a $4.7 million decrease in income tax payable.

Investing Activities

Our principal investing activities during 2016 were the funding of $39.6 million of capital expenditures and $4.3 million proceeds from the sale of the Rogers facility. Principal investing activities during 2015 included the funding of $39.5 million of capital expenditures and the purchase of $1.0 million of certificates of deposit, partially offset by the receipt of $3.8 million cash proceeds from maturing certificates of deposit and $1.9 million proceeds from sales of fixed assets.

Financing Activities

Our principal financing activities during 2016 consisted of the repurchase of our common stock for cash totaling $20.7 million and payment of cash dividends on our common stock totaling $18.3 million, partially offset by the receipt of cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options totaling $1.6 million. Financing activities during 2015 consisted of the repurchase of our common stock for cash totaling $19.6 million and payment of cash dividends on our common stock totaling $19.1 million, partially offset by the receipt of cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options totaling $7.3 million.

Risk Management

We are subject to various risks and uncertainties in the ordinary course of business due, in part, to the competitive global nature of the industry in which we operate, to changing commodity prices for the materials used in the manufacture of our products, and to development of new products.

We have operations in Mexico with sale and purchase transactions denominated in both Pesos and dollars. The Peso is the functional currency of certain of our operations in Mexico. The settlement of accounts receivable and

accounts payable transactions denominated in anon-functional currency results in foreign currency transaction gains and losses. In 2017, the value of the Mexican Peso increased by 5.1 percent in relation to the U.S. dollar. We had foreign currency transaction gains in 2017 of $11.0 million and losses in 2016 and 2015 of $0.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, which are included in other income (expense) in the Consolidated Income Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report. In addition to gains on Peso foreign currency transactions, the 2017 gain includes an $8.2 million realized gain on a Zloty forward contract used to hedge the acquisition purchase price and a $2.5 million unrealized loss on a Euro cross currency swap.

Since 1990, the Mexican Peso has experienced periods of relative stability followed by periods of major declines in value. The impact of changes in value of our foreign operations relative to the U.S. dollar has resulted in a cumulative unrealized translation loss at December 31, 2017 of $101.0 million. Translation gains and losses are included in other comprehensive income (loss) in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.

We also have operations in Europe with sale and purchase transactions denominated in Euros and Zlotys. The Euro is the functional currency of our operations in Europe. A significant component of our European production operations is located in Poland. The settlement of accounts receivable and accounts payable for these operations requires the transfer of funds denominated in Zlotys. The value of the Euro has increased 7.2 percent in relation to the U.S. dollar in the seven months following the acquisition of Uniwheels ended December 31, 2017. During that same period the value of the Zloty has remained relatively flat in relation to the Euro. Foreign currency transaction gains totaled $1.9 million in 2017. All transaction gains and losses are included in other income (expense) in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

As it relates to foreign currency translation gains and losses, the Euro has experienced periods of relative stability in value. The impact of changes in value relative to our European operations resulted in a cumulative unrealized translation gain at December 31, 2017 of $26.2 million. Translation gains and losses are included in other comprehensive income in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Changes in currency exchange rates may affect the relative prices at which we and our foreign competitors sell products in the same market. In addition, changes in the value of the relevant currencies may affect the cost of certain items required in our operations. The vast majority of our European revenues will be denominated in the Euros. Accordingly, the foreign exchange exposure associated with Peso and Zloty denominated costs is a growing risk factor and could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

We are entering into foreign currency forward and option contracts with financial institutions to protect against foreign exchange risks associated with certain existing assets and liabilities, certain firmly committed transactions and forecasted future cash flows. We have implemented a program to hedge a portion of our material foreign exchange exposures, typically for up to 48 months. However, we may choose not to hedge certain foreign exchange exposures for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to accounting considerations and prohibitive economic cost of hedging particular exposures. We do not use derivative contracts for trading, market-making, or speculative purposes. For additional information on our derivatives, see Notes 5 and 20 of the Notes to the Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.

When market conditions warrant, we may enter into purchase commitments to secure the supply of certain commodities used in the manufacture of our products, such as aluminum, natural gas and other raw materials. We previously had several purchase commitments for the delivery of natural gas through 2015. These natural gas contracts were considered to be derivatives under U.S. GAAP, and when entering into these contracts, it was expected that we would take full delivery of the contracted quantities of natural gas over the normal course of business. Accordingly, at inception, these contracts qualified for the normal purchase, normal sale (“NPNS”) exemption provided for under U.S. GAAP.


Contractual Obligations

Contractual obligations as of December 31, 20172019 are as follows (amounts in millions):

 

  Payments Due by Fiscal Year 

 

Payments Due by Fiscal Year

 

Contractual Obligations

  2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   Thereafter   Total 

 

2020

 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2024

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

Total

 

Long-term debt

  $4.0   $3.2   $3.2   $7.2   $7.2   $683.1   $707.9 

 

$

3.0

 

 

$

3.0

 

 

$

3.0

 

 

$

3.0

 

 

$

372.4

 

 

$

243.1

 

 

$

627.5

 

Retirement plans

   1.4    1.4    1.5    1.4    1.5    43.9    51.1 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

41.7

 

 

 

49.2

 

Purchase obligations

   13.6    —      —      —      —      —      13.6 

 

 

18.6

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20.4

 

Capital leases

   0.8    0.5    —      —      —      —      1.3 

Finance leases

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

3.1

 

Operating leases

   4.4    3.2    3.2    2.9    2.5    7.2    23.4 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

1.9

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

16.2

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $24.2   $8.3   $7.9   $11.5   $11.2   $734.2   $797.3 

 

$

27.1

 

 

$

9.8

 

 

$

7.2

 

 

$

6.5

 

 

$

375.8

 

 

$

290.0

 

 

$

716.4

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The table above does not reflect unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties of $35.5$34.3 million, for which the timing of settlement is uncertain, a $16.1$8.7 million liability carried on our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017of liabilities for derivative financial instruments maturing in 20182020 through 20212023 nor the redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative liability of $4.7$3.9 million. In addition, the table does not include dividend payments due quarterly nor the redemption value of the redeemable preferred stock in 2025.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we had no significantoff-balance sheet arrangements other than factoring of $13.6$49.6 million of our trade receivables in European business.receivables.

Inflation

Inflation has not had a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition for the three years ended December 31, 2017. Cost increases in our principal raw material, aluminum, fundamentally are passed through to our customers, with timing of the pass-through dependent on the specific commercial agreements. Wage increases during the current year ranged from approximately 3 percent to 6 percent depending on location and job performance. Cost increases for labor, other raw materials and for energy may not be recovered in our selling prices. Additionally, competitive global pricing pressures are expected to continue, which may lessen the possibility of recovering these types of cost increases in selling prices.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

In this Annual Report, we discuss two important measures that are not calculated according to U.S. GAAP, value added sales and Adjusted EBITDA.

Value added sales is a key measure that is not calculated according to GAAP. In the discussion of operating results, we provide information regarding value added sales. Value added sales represents net sales less the value of aluminum and services provided by outsourced service providers (OSPs)(“OSPs”) that are included in net sales. As discussed further below, arrangements with our customers allow us to pass on changes in aluminum prices and OSP costs;prices; therefore, fluctuations in underlying aluminum price and the use of OSPs generally do not directly impact our profitability. Accordingly, value added sales is worthy of being highlighted for the benefit of users of our financial statements. Our intent is to allow users of the financial statements to consider our net sales information both with and without the aluminum and OSP cost components thereof. Management utilizes value

added sales as a key metric to determine growth of the companyCompany because it eliminates the volatility of aluminum prices.

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

  2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

(Thousands of dollars)            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Sales

  $1,108,055  $732,677  $727,946  $745,447  $789,564 

Net sales

 

$

1,372,487

 

 

$

1,501,827

 

 

$

1,108,055

 

 

$

732,677

 

 

$

727,946

 

Less, aluminum value and OSP

   (491,302 (323,987 (367,100 (376,092 (388,973

 

 

(617,162

)

 

 

(704,640

)

 

 

(491,302

)

 

 

(323,987

)

 

 

(367,100

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Value added sales

  $616,753  $408,690  $360,846  $369,355  $400,591 

 

$

755,325

 

 

$

797,187

 

 

$

616,753

 

 

$

408,690

 

 

$

360,846

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA is a key measure that is not calculated according to U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest income and expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, restructuring charges and other closure costs and impairments of long-lived assets and investments, changes in the fair value of the redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative liability, acquisition costs and integration costs.costs, certain hiring and separation related costs, gains associated with early debt extinguishment, and accounts receivable factoring fees. We use Adjusted EBITDA as an important indicator of the operating performance of our business. Adjusted EBITDA is used in our internal forecasts and models when establishing internal operating budgets, supplementing the financial results and forecasts reported to our Board of Directors and evaluating short-term and long-term operating trends in our operations. We believe the Adjusted EBITDA financial measure assists in providing a more complete understanding of our underlying operational measures to manage our business, to evaluate our performance compared to prior periods and the marketplace and to establish operational goals. Adjusted EBITDA is anon-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial information provided in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Thisnon-GAAP financial measure may not be computed in the same manner as similarly titled measures used by other companies.

Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net sales is a key measure that is not calculated according to GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net sales is defined as Adjusted EBITDA divided by net sales.27

Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of value added sales is a key measure that is not calculated according to GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of value added sales is defined as Adjusted EBITDA divided by value added sales.


The following table reconciles our net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to our Adjusted EBITDA:

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 
(Thousands of dollars)                

Income from operations

   21,518   54,602   36,294   17,913   34,593 

Interest (expense) income, net

   (40,004  245   103   1,095   1,691 

Other income (expense), net

   13,188   (126  (1,114  (3,306  557 

Change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative liability(3)

   6,164   —     —     —     —   

Income tax provision

   (6,875  (13,340  (11,339  (6,899  (14,017
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

  $(6,009 $41,381  $23,944  $8,803  $22,824 

Interest expense (income), net

   40,004   (245  (103  (1,095  (1,691

Income tax provision

   6,875   13,340   11,339   6,899   14,017 

Depreciation(1)

   54,167   34,261   34,530   35,582   28,466 

Amortization

   15,168   —     —     —     —   

Acquisition support, integration and other(2)

   35,906   —     —     —     —   

Change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative liability(3)

   (6,164  —     —     —     —   

Closure costs (excluding accelerated depreciation)(4)

   138   1,210   6,343   5,564   —   

Gain on sale of facility(4)

   —     (1,436  —     —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $140,085  $88,511  $76,053  $55,753  $63,616 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net sales

   12.6  12.1  10.4  7.5  8.1

Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of value added sales

   22.7  21.7  21.1  15.1  15.9

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

(Thousands of dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(96,460

)

 

$

25,961

 

 

$

(6,009

)

 

$

41,381

 

 

$

23,944

 

Interest expense (income), net

 

 

47,011

 

 

 

50,097

 

 

 

40,004

 

 

 

(245

)

 

 

(103

)

Income tax provision

 

 

3,423

 

 

 

6,291

 

 

 

6,875

 

 

 

13,340

 

 

 

11,339

 

Depreciation (1)

 

 

75,773

 

 

 

68,753

 

 

 

54,167

 

 

 

34,261

 

 

 

34,530

 

Amortization

 

 

24,944

 

 

 

26,303

 

 

 

15,168

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles (5)

 

 

102,238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition, integration, restructuring, debt

   extinguishment gains and factoring fees (2)

 

 

11,084

 

 

 

11,698

 

 

 

36,044

 

 

 

1,210

 

 

 

6,343

 

Change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock

   embedded derivative liability (3)

 

 

782

 

 

 

(3,480

)

 

 

(6,164

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of facility (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,436

)

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

168,795

 

 

$

185,623

 

 

$

140,085

 

 

$

88,511

 

 

$

76,053

 

Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of net sales

 

 

12.3

%

 

 

12.4

%

 

 

12.6

%

 

 

12.1

%

 

 

10.4

%

Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of value added

   sales

 

 

22.3

%

 

 

23.3

%

 

 

22.7

%

 

 

21.7

%

 

 

21.1

%

 

(1)

Depreciation expense in 2019, 2016 and 2015 includes $7.6 million, $0.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively, of accelerated depreciation charges as a result of shortened estimated useful lives due to restructuring activities described in Note 3, “Restructuring” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report.activities.

(2)

WeIn 2019, we incurred $25.1approximately $5.4 million of Fayetteville restructuring costs related(excluding $7.6 million of accelerated depreciation), and $1.8 million of machinery and equipment relocation costs from Fayetteville to theother Superior sites, $4.8 million of certain hiring and separation costs, $1.7 million of acquisition of Uniwheels. Additionally, we have incurred approximately $10.8 million inand integration costs, related to aligning the two companies.$1.0 million of accounts receivable factoring fees, and $3.7 million of gains on extinguishment of debt.

In 2018, we incurred approximately $9.7 million in integration costs, $1.5 million of CEO separation costs and $0.5 million of accounts receivable factoring fees.

In 2017, we incurred $25.1 million of costs related to the acquisition of Uniwheels and $10.8 million in integration costs.

During 2016, we incurred $1.2 million in closure and operating costs (excluding $0.3 million in depreciation) associated with the closure of our facility in Rogers, Arkansas.

During 2015, we had completed the shutdown of the Rogers facility which resulted in recording $4.3 million in impairment of fixed assets, and $2.0 million of closure costs.

(3)

The change in the fair value is mainly driven by the change in our stock price from the original valuation date in May 2017. Refer to Note 13, “Redeemable Preferred Shares”4, “Fair Value Measurements” and Note 5, “Derivative Financial Instruments” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report.

(4)(4)

In the fourth quarter of 2016, we sold the Rogers facility, for total proceeds of $4.3 million, resultingwhich resulted in a $1.4 million gain on sale. Prior

(5)

In the fourth quarter of 2019, we recognized a goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles impairment charge of $102.2 million   relating to our European reporting unit (refer to Note 10, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” in the Notes to the saleConsolidated Financial Statements in 2016, Rogers incurred $1.5 millionItem 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in closure and operating costs, which included $0.3 million in depreciation. The Rogers facility Adjusted EBITDA was a positive $0.2 million in 2016 due to the $1.4 million gain on sale. During 2015, we had completed the shutdown of the Rogers facility which resulted in a gross margin loss of $8.0 million. We incurred $4.3 million in restructuring costs related to an impairment of fixed assets and other associated costs such as asset relocation costs. Additionally, we experienced $2.0 million of further closure costs including inefficiencies and $1.7 million in depreciation. The Adjusted EBITDA impact of the Rogers facility closure for 2015 was $6.3 million, which includes the $4.3 million of restructuring costs and $2.0 million of inefficiency costs related to the closure. During 2014, we recorded $3.1 million of restructuring costs excluding accelerated depreciation and we impaired an investment by $2.5 million.this Annual Report).

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparationAccounting estimates are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to apply significant judgment in makingstatements. These estimates require the use of judgments and assumptions that affect amountsthe reported therein, as well as

financial information included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. These estimates and assumptions, which are based upon historical experience, industry trends, terms of various past and present agreements and contracts and information available from other sources that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, form the basis for making judgments about the carrying valuesamounts of assets and liabilities, thatthe disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses in the periods presented. We believe the accounting estimates employed are not readily apparent through other sources. There can be no assurance thatappropriate and the resulting balances are reasonable; however, due to the inherent uncertainties in developing estimates actual results reportedcould differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustments to these balances in future periods (refer to Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the future will not differ from these estimates, or that future changesNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements in these estimates will not adversely impactItem 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report for our results of operations or financial condition. As described below, the most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparationpolicies related to our critical accounting estimates).

28


Wheel Revenue Recognition - Sales of our financial statements include estimatesproducts and assumptions as to revenue recognition, inventory valuation, amortization of preproduction costs, impairment of and the estimated useful lives of our long-lived assets, the fair value of stock-based compensation, as well as those used in the determination of liabilities related to self-insured portions of employee benefits, workers’ compensation, derivatives and deferred income taxes.

Wheel Revenue Recognition - Our products are manufactured to customer specifications under standard purchase orders. We ship our products to OEM customers based on release schedules provided weekly by our customers. Our sales and production levels are highly dependent upon the weekly forecasted production levels of our customers. Sales of these products, net of estimated pricing adjustments and their related costs are recognized when title and risk of losscontrol transfers to the customer, generally upon shipment. Tooling reimbursement revenues, related to initial tooling reimbursed by our customers, are deferred and recognized over the expected life of the wheel program on a straight-line basis. A portion of our selling prices to OEM customers is attributable to the aluminum content of our wheels. Our selling prices are adjusted periodically for changes in the current aluminum market based upon specified aluminum price indices during specific pricing periods, as agreed with our customers. SeePreproduction Costs and Revenue Recognition Related to Long-Term Supply Arrangementsbelow forOur selling prices also incorporate a discussion of tooling reimbursement revenues.

Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities - In order to hedge exposure related to fluctuations in foreign currency rates and the cost of certain commodities used in the manufacture of our products, we periodically may purchase derivative financial instruments such as forward contracts, options or collars to offset or mitigate the impact of such fluctuations. Programs to hedge currency rate exposure may address ongoing transactions, including foreign-currency-denominated receivables and payables, as well as specific transactions related to purchase obligations. Programs to hedge exposure to commodity cost fluctuations would bewheel weight price component which is based on underlying physical consumption of such commodity.

We account for our derivative instruments as either assets or liabilitiescustomer product specifications. Weights are monitored, and carry them at fair value. For derivative instruments that hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that are designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) in shareholders’ equity and reclassified into income in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument, if any, is recognized in current income. To receive hedge accounting treatment, cash flow hedges must be highly effective in offsetting changes to expected future cash flows on hedged transactions. For forward exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges, changes in the time value are included in the definition of hedge effectiveness. Accordingly, any gains or losses related to this component are reported as a component of AOCI in shareholders’ equity and reclassified into income in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Derivatives that do not qualify as hedgesprices are adjusted as variations arise. Customer contract prices are generally adjusted quarterly to fair value through current income. See Note 5, “Derivative Financial Instruments” in the Notesincorporate these price adjustments. Price adjustments due to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further discussion of derivatives.

When market conditions warrant, we may also enter into contracts to secure the supply of certain commodities used in the manufacture of our products, suchproduction efficiencies are generally recognized as aluminum, natural gas and other raw materials. We previously had several purchase commitments for the delivery of natural gas through the end of 2015. These natural gas contracts were considered to be derivative instruments under U.S. GAAP and when entering into these contracts, it was expected that we would take full delivery of the contracted quantities of natural gas over the normal course of business. Accordingly, at inception, these contracts qualified for the normal purchase normal sale exemption provided for under U.S. GAAP. As such, we do not account for these purchase commitments as derivatives

negotiated with customers.

unless there is a change in the facts or circumstances that causes management to believe that these commitments would not be used in the normal course of business. In our European business, we have entered into forward contracts for aluminum which hedge the risk of fluctuations in commodity prices. See Note 20, “Risk Management” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for additional information pertaining to these purchase commitments.

Redeemable Preferred Stock Embedded Derivative -In addition to derivative financial instruments used in hedging activities, weWe issued redeemable preferred stock as a part of the financing for the acquisition of our European business. The redeemable preferred stock includes embedded derivatives relating to the conversion and early redemption options. Accordingly, we have recorded an embedded derivative liability representing the combined fair value of the right of holders to receive common stock upon conversion of Series A redeemable preferred stock at any time (the “conversion option”) and the right of the holders to exercise their early redemption option upon the occurrence of a redemption event (the “early redemption option”). The embedded derivative liability is adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end with changes in fair value recorded in the “Change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative liability” financial statement line item of the company’sCompany’s consolidated statements of operations.income statement.

A binomial option pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of the conversion and early redemption options embedded in the redeemable preferred stock. The binomial model utilizes a “decision tree” whereby future movement in the company’sCompany’s common stock price is estimated based on the volatility factor. The binomial optionsoption pricing model requires the development and use of assumptions. These assumptions include estimated volatility of the value of our common stock, assumed possible conversion or early redemption dates, an appropriate risk-free interest rate, risky bond rate and dividend yield. Seeyield (refer to Note 13, “Redeemable Preferred Shares”5, “Derivative Financial Instruments” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report for additional information pertaining to these embedded derivatives.derivatives).

Fair Value Measurements - The companyCompany applies fair value accounting for all financial assets and liabilities andnon-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, while other assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as when we have an asset impairment. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Inputs that are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Our derivatives areover-the-counter customized derivative transactions and are not exchange traded. We estimate the fair value of these instruments using industry-standard valuation models such as a discounted cash flow. These models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based expectations for interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices and the contractual terms of the derivative instruments. The discount rate used is the relevant interbank deposit rate (e.g., LIBOR) plus an adjustment fornon-performance risk. In certain cases, market data may not be available, and we may use broker quotes and models (e.g., Black-Scholes) to determine fair value. This includes situations where there is lack of liquidity for a particular currency or commodity or when the instrument is longer dated. The fair value measurements of the redeemable preferred shares embedded derivatives are based upon Level 3 unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the liability - refer(refer to Note 5, “Derivative Financial Instruments” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.

Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value and categorized as raw material,work-in-process or finished goods. When necessary, management uses estimates of net realizable value to record inventory reserves for obsolete and/or slow-moving inventory. Our inventory values in North America, which are based upon standard costs for raw materials and labor and overhead established at the beginning of the year, are adjusted to actual costs on afirst-in,first-out (“FIFO”) basis. Current raw material prices and labor and overhead costs are utilized in developing these adjustments. Our inventories in Europe are based on average cost or the FIFO method.

Preproduction Costs and Revenue Recognition Related to Long-Term Supply Arrangements - We incur preproduction engineering and tooling costs related to the products produced for our customers under long-term supply agreements. We expense all preproduction engineering costs for which reimbursement is not contractually guaranteed by the customer or which are in excess of the contractually guaranteed reimbursement amount. We amortize the cost of the customer-owned tooling over the expected life of the wheel program on a straight-line basis. Also, we defer any reimbursements made to us by our customers and recognize the tooling reimbursement revenue over the same period in which the tooling is in use. Changes in the facts and circumstances of individual wheel programs may accelerate the amortization of both the cost of the customer-owned tooling and the deferred tooling reimbursement revenues. Recognized tooling reimbursement revenues, which totaled approximately $11.9 million, $8.0 million and $5.8 million, in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are included in net sales in the Consolidated Income Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” ofin this Annual Report. The following tables summarize the unamortized customer-owned tooling costs included in ournon-current assets, and the deferred tooling revenues included in accrued liabilities and othernon-current liabilities:Report).

December 31,

  2017   2016 
(Dollars in Thousands)        

Unamortized Preproduction Costs

    

Preproduction costs

  $84,198   $78,299 

Accumulated amortization

   (71,409   (65,100
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net preproduction costs

  $12,789   $13,199 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred Tooling Revenue

    

Accrued liabilities

  $4,654   $5,419 

Othernon-current liabilities

   1,974    2,593 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tooling revenue

  $6,628   $8,012 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impairment of Goodwill - As of December 31, 2017,2019 and 2018, we had recorded goodwill of $304.8$184.8 million and $291.4 million as a result of ourthe acquisition of our European business on May 30, 2017. Goodwill must beis not amortized but is tested for impairment on at least an annual basis and as of an interim period if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment is more likely than not to have occurred. In conducting ourbasis.

We conducted the annual impairment testing, we may first perform a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. If not, no further goodwill impairment testing is performed. If it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount, or if we elect not to perform a qualitative assessment of a reporting unit, we compare the fair value of the reporting unit to the related net book value. If the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is measured and recognized. We conduct our annual impairment testing as of the last day of our fourth quarter.December 31, 2019 using a quantitative approach. We utilizeutilized both an income approach and a market approach supplemented by an income approach to assess fair value for goodwill.

In 2017, we performed a quantitative assessment of our European reporting unit as of December 31, 2017. The assessment indicated thatdetermine the fair value of the European reporting unit as part of our goodwill impairment assessment. The income approach is based on projected debt-free cash flow, which is discounted to the present value using discount factors that consider the timing and risk of cash flows. The discount rate used is the weighted average of the estimated cost of equity and of debt (“weighted average cost of capital”). The weighted average cost of capital is adjusted as necessary to reflect risk associated with the business of the European reporting unit. Financial projections are based on estimated production volumes, product

29


prices and expenses, including raw material cost, wages, energy and other expenses. Other significant assumptions include terminal value cash flow and growth rates, future capital expenditures and changes in future working capital requirements. The market approach is based on the observed ratios of enterprise value to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of comparable, publicly traded companies. The market approach fair value is determined by multiplying historical and anticipated financial metrics of the European reporting unit by the EBITDA pricing multiples derived from comparable, publicly traded companies. A considerable amount of management judgment and assumptions are required in performing the quantitative impairment test, principally related to determining the fair value of the reporting unit.  While the Company believes its judgments and assumptions are reasonable, different assumptions could change the estimated fair value.

We determined that the carrying value of the European reporting unit exceeded its respectivefair value at December 31, 2019. The decline in fair value was due to lower forecasted industry production volumes in our long-range plan (completed in the fourth quarter of 2019), as compared to our prior year long-range plan. This was primarily due to softening in the Western and Central European automotive market. Industry forecasts for Western and Central European production volumes in 2020 to 2023 are lower than prior year forecasts by approximately 6 percent, with the most significant decline in the outlook occurring in the fourth quarter of 2019. Similarly, EBITDA and cash flow for the European reporting unit declined as compared to the prior year long-range plan due to lower forecasted production volumes, which adversely impacted fair value under both the income and market approaches, respectively. In determining the fair value, the Company weighted the income and market approaches, 75 percent and 25 percent, respectively. Significant assumptions used under the income approach included a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 10.0 percent and a long-term growth rate of 2.0 percent. In determining the WACC, management considered the level of risk inherent in the cash flow projections and current market conditions. The use of these unobservable inputs results in classification of the fair value estimate as a Level 3 measurement in the fair value hierarchy. Based on the results of our quantitative analysis, we recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment charge equal to the excess of the carrying value.value over the fair value of the European reporting unit at December 31, 2019 of $99.5 million (refer to Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 10, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report for further discussion of asset impairments).

Impairment of Intangible Assets – Intangible assets include both finite and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Finite-lived intangible assets consist of brand names, technology and customer relationships. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line over their estimated useful lives (since the pattern in which the asset will be consumed cannot be reliably determined). Indefinite-lived intangible assets, excluding goodwill, consist of trade names associated with our aftermarket business.  In the fourth quarter of 2019, we recognized an indefinite-lived intangible impairment charge of $2.7 million relating to trade names used in our European aftermarket business (refer to Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 10, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report for further discussion of asset impairments).  

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Investments - In accordance with U.S. GAAP, managementManagement evaluates the recoverability and estimated remaining lives of long-lived assets whenever facts and circumstances suggest that

the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed. See Note 1, “SummaryFair value is determined primarily using anticipated cash flows. If the carrying amount of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further discussion ofa long-lived asset impairments.

When facts and circumstances indicate that there may have beengroup is considered impaired, a loss in value, management will also evaluate its cost and equity method investments to determine whether there was an other-than-temporary impairment. If a loss in the value of the investment is determined to be other than temporary, then the decline in value is recognized in earnings. See Note 10, “Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for discussion of our investment.

Trade names - The fair value of our trade name is estimated based upon management’s estimates using a royalty savings approach, which isrecorded based on the principle that, ifamount by which the business did not own thecarrying amount exceeds fair value. The North American and European reporting units are separately tested for impairment on an asset it would have to license it in order to earn the returns that it was earning. The fair value is calculated based on the present value of the royalty stream that the business was saving by owning the asset. The projections that we use in our model are updated annually and will change over time based on the historical performance and changing business conditions of the European business. The determination of whether a trade name is impaired involves a significant level of judgment in these assumptions, and changes in our business strategy, or economic or market conditions could significantly impact these judgments.group basis.

Retirement Plans - Subject to certain vesting requirements, our unfunded retirement plan generally provides for a benefit based on final average compensation, which becomes payable on the employee’s death or upon attaining age 65, if retired. The net periodic pension cost and related benefit obligations are based on, among other things, assumptions of the discount rate future salary increases and the mortality of the participants. The net periodic pension costs and related obligations are measured using actuarial techniques and assumptions. Seeassumptions (refer to Note 16,17, “Retirement Plans” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report for a description of these assumptions.assumptions).

The following information illustrates the sensitivity to a change in certain assumptions of our unfunded retirement plans as of December 31, 2017.2019. Note that these sensitivities may be asymmetrical and are specific to 2017.2019. They also may not be additive, so the impact of changing multiple factors simultaneously cannot be calculated by combining the individual sensitivities shown.

The effect of the indicated increase (decrease) in selected factors is shown below (in thousands):

 

    Increase (Decrease) in: 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease) in:

 

Assumption

  Percentage
Change
 Projected Benefit
Obligation at
December 31,
2017
   2017 Net
Periodic
Pension
Cost
 

 

Percentage

Change

 

 

Projected Benefit

Obligation at

December 31,

2019

 

 

2020 Net

Periodic

Pension

Cost

 

Discount rate

   +1.0 $(3,429  $(156

 

 

+1.0

%

 

$

(3,482

)

 

$

(3

)

Rate of compensation increase

   +1.0 $427   $51 

 

 

+1.0

%

 

$

356

 

 

$

28

 


Stock-Based CompensationValuation of Deferred Tax Assets - We accountThe ability to realize deferred tax assets depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward periods provided for stock-based compensation using the fair value recognition in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of any stock options granted, which requires us to make estimates regarding dividend yields on our common stock, expected volatility in the price of our common stock, risk free interest rates, forfeiture rates and the expected life of the option. To the extent these estimates change, our stock-based compensation expense would change as well.tax law for each applicable tax jurisdiction. The fair value of any restricted shares awardedassessment regarding whether a valuation allowance is calculated using the closing market price of our common stock on the date of issuance. We recognize these compensation costs net of the applicable forfeiture rates and recognize the compensation costs for only those shares expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting term of threerequired or four years. We estimated the forfeiture rate based on our historical experience.

Trade names - The fair value of our trade name is estimated based upon management’s estimates using a royalty savings approach, whichshould be adjusted is based on an evaluation of possible sources of taxable income and also considers all available positive and negative evidence factors. Our accounting for the principle that, if the business did not own the asset, it would have to

license it in order to earn the returns that it was earning. The fair value is calculated based on the present value of the royalty stream that the business was saving by owning the asset. The projections that we use in our model are updated annually and will change over time based on the historical performance and changing business conditions of the European business. The determination of whether a trade name is impaired involves a significant level of judgment in these assumptions, and changes in our business strategy, or economic or market conditions could significantly impact these judgments.

Workers’ Compensation and Loss Reserves - We self-insure any losses arising out of workers’ compensation claims. Workers’ compensation accruals are based upon reported claims in process and actuarial estimates for losses incurred but not reported. Loss reserves, including incurred but not reported reserves, are estimated using actuarial methods and ultimate settlements may vary significantly from such estimates due to increased claim frequency or the severity of claims.

Accounting for Income Taxes - We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. The asset and liability method requires the recognitionvaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences that currently exist between the tax basis and financial reporting basis ofrepresents our assets and liabilities. We calculate current and deferred tax provisions based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from actual results reflected on the income tax returns filed during the following years. Adjustments based on filed returns are recorded when identified in the subsequent years.

The effect on deferred taxes for a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that the tax rate change is enacted. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred income tax assets when, in our judgment, based upon currently available information and other factors, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of such deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The determination of the need for a valuation allowance is based on anon-going evaluation of current information including, among other things, historical operating results, estimates of future earnings in different taxing jurisdictions and the expected timing of the reversals of temporary differences. We believe that the determination to record a valuation allowance to reduce a deferred income tax asset is a significant accounting estimate because it is based, among other things, on anbest estimate of future taxable incomeevents. Changes in the U.S. and certain other jurisdictions, which is susceptibleour current estimates, due to change and mayunanticipated market conditions, governmental legislative actions or may not occur, and because the impact of adjustingevents, could have a valuation allowance may be material.

In determining when to release the valuation allowance established against our net deferred income tax assets, we consider all available evidence, both positive and negative. Consistent with our policy, the valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax assets will not be reversed until such time as we have generated three years of cumulativepre-tax income and have reached sustained profitability, which we define as two consecutiveone-year periods ofpre-tax income.

We account for our uncertain tax positions utilizing atwo-step approach to evaluate tax positions. Step one, recognition, requires evaluation of the tax position to determine if based solely on technical merits it is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. Step two, measurement, is addressed only if a position is more likely than not to be sustained. In step two, the tax benefit is measured as the largest amount of benefit, determined on a cumulative probability basis, which is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement with tax authorities. If a position does not meet the more likely than not threshold for recognition in step one, no benefit is recorded until the first subsequent period in which the more likely than not standard is met, the issue is resolved with the taxing authority, or the statute of limitations expires. Positions previously recognized are derecognized when we subsequently determine the position no longer is more likely than not to be sustained. Evaluation of tax positions, their technical merits and measurements using cumulative probability are highly subjective management estimates. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

Presently, we have not recorded a deferred tax liability for temporary differences related to investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration. These temporary differences may become taxable

upon a repatriation of earnings from the subsidiaries or a sale or liquidation of the subsidiaries. At this time the company does not have any plans to repatriate income from its foreign subsidiaries.

New Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This update outlines a single, comprehensive model for accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. We plan to adopt this update on January 1, 2018. The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (modified retrospective method). We anticipate adopting the standard using the modified retrospective method. We have completed our assessment and do not expect that implementation will have any material effect on our financial position or operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU2016-02”). ASU2016-02 requires an entityability to recognizeright-of-use assets and lease liabilities on its balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. ASU2016-02 offers specific accounting guidance for a lessee, a lessor and sale and leaseback transactions. Lessees and lessors are required to disclose qualitative and quantitative information about leasing arrangements to enable a user of the financial statements to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. For public companies, ASU2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period, and requires a modified retrospective adoption, with early adoption permitted. We are evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our financial position and statement of operations.

In August 2016, the FASB issued an ASU entitled “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 740): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” The objective of the ASU is to address the diversity in practice in the presentation of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our statement of cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued an ASU entitled “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The objective of the ASU is to simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our financial position and statement of operations.

In January 2017, the FASB issued an ASU entitled “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business.” The objective of the ASU is to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our financial position and statement of operations.

In March 2017, the FASB issued an ASU entitled “Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” The objective of the ASU is to improve the reporting of net benefit cost in the financial statements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our financial position and statement of operations.

In July 2017, the FASB issued an ASU entitled “(Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial

instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception.” The objective of this ASU is to reduce the complexity in accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. When determining whether certain financial instruments should be classified as debt or equity instruments, a down round feature would no longer preclude equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our financial position and statement of operations.

In August 2017, the FASB issued an ASU entitled “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815).” The objective of this standard is to better align financial reporting with risk management activities, provide a more faithful representation of hedging activities and reduce complexity and costs associated with hedging. This ASU removes the requirement to recognize hedge ineffectiveness in income prior to settlement, allows documentation of hedge effectiveness at inception to be completed byquarter-end, allows qualitative rather than quantitative assessment of effectiveness (subsequent to initial quantitative assessment), allows critical terms match for cash flow hedges of a group of forecasted transactions if derivatives mature within the same month as transactions, permits use of the “back up” long haul method for hedges initially designated using the short cut method and permits cash flow hedging of a component of purchases and sales ofnon-financial assets (i.e., commodity price excluding transportation) resulting in higher hedge effectiveness. The ASU also permits fair value hedging of the benchmark interest rate component of interest rate risk as well as partial term hedging, allows partial term fair value hedges of interest rate risk, permits cash flow hedging of interest rate risk for a contractually specified rate rather than a benchmark rate and permits exclusion of cross currency basis spread in determining effectiveness. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our financial position and statement of operations.

On December 22, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118) to provide guidance regarding accounting and disclosure for tax effects arising from changes in tax regulations under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) enacted December 22, 2017. The Act contains significant changes to corporate taxation, including reduction in the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, aone-time transition tax on offshore earnings at reduced tax rates, elimination of U.S. tax on foreign dividends, new taxes on certain foreign earnings, a new minimum tax related to payments to foreign subsidiaries and affiliates, immediate deductions for certain new investments and the modification or repeal of many business deductions and credits. The Act will also have international tax consequences for many companies that operate internationally. Generally, the SEC guidance directs companies to recognize income tax effects where requisite analysis can be completed prior to issuance of financial statements; estimate income tax effects where analysis is not yet complete but a reasonable estimate can be determined; and disclose effects where no reasonable estimate can be determined. The reasonable estimate would be reported as a provisional amount during a “measurement period.” In circumstances in which provisional amounts cannot be prepared, tax provisions should be determined based on tax laws in effect immediately prior to enactment of the Act. Disclosures should include tax effects for which accounting is incomplete; items reported as provisional amounts; current orutilize deferred tax amounts for which the incomeassets. At December 31, 2019 total deferred tax effects of the Act have not been completed; the reason the initial accounting is incomplete; additional information needed to complete the accounting requirements under ASC Topic 740; natureassets were $82.4 million and amount of any measurement period adjustments recognized during the reporting period; effect of measurement period adjustments on the effectivevaluation allowances against those deferred tax rate; and the point at which accounting for the all tax effects of the Act has been completed. Referassets were $22.9 million (refer to Note 14,15, “Income Taxes” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report for additional information including the impact of the Act on our financial position and results of operations.information).

ITEM 7A - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Foreign Currency. A significant portion of our We have business operations are conducted in the United States, Mexico, and Europe, principally Germany and Poland. As a result, we have a certain degree of market risk with respect to our cash

flows due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates when transactions are denominated in currencies other than our functional currency, including inter-company transactions.

In accordance with our corporate risk management policies, we may enter into foreign currency forward, swap and option contracts and currency swaps with financial institutions to protect againstmitigate foreign exchange riskscurrency exposures associated with certain existing assets and liabilities, certain firmly committed transactions and forecasted future cash flows. We have implemented a program to hedge a portion of our materialPeso, Zloty and Euro foreign exchange exposures,exposure, for up to approximately 48 months. However, we may choose not to hedge certain foreign exchange exposures for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, accounting considerations and prohibitive economic cost of hedging particular exposures. We do not use derivative contracts for trading, market-making, or speculative purposes. For additional information on our derivatives, seerefer to Note 5, “Derivative Financial Instruments” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Annual Report.

At December 31, 2017,2019, the net fair value net liability forasset of foreign currency exchange derivatives for the Pesowith an aggregate notional value of $522.7 million was $11.5$21.1 million. The potential loss in fair value forof such financial instruments from a 10 percent adverse change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates would be $23.3$56.5 million at December 31, 2017.2019.

During 2017, the Mexican pesoIn addition to U.S. dollar exchange rate averaged 18.96 Pesos to $1.00. Based on the balance sheetoperational foreign currency exposure, we have issued notes with a face value of €250 million maturing June 15, 2025 (with outstanding principal of €217.0 million at December 31, 2017, the value2019).   

Interest Rate Risk.  At December 31, 2019, approximately $371.8 million of net assets for our operations in Mexico was 2,456 million Pesos. Accordingly, a 10 percentdebt bears interest at variable rates, currently 5.7 percent. A 100 basis point change in the relationship between the peso and the U.S. dollarour rate would result in a translation impactan increase or decrease of $13.0 million, which would be recognized$3.7 million. We have entered into interest rate swaps exchanging floating for fixed rate interest payments in other comprehensive (loss) income.

Since Uniwheels was acquired on May 30, 2017, the Euroorder to U.S. dollar exchangereduce interest rate averaged $1.17 to 1.00 Euro. Based on the balance sheet atvolatility. As of December 31, 2017, the value of net assets for our operations in Europe was 683.1 million Euros. Accordingly, a 10 percent change in the relationship between the Euro and the U.S. dollar would result in a translation impact of $79.8 million, which would be recognized in other comprehensive income.

At December 31, 20172019, the fair value liability for foreign currency exchange derivatives (consisting of cross currency swaps) for the Eurointerest rate swaps with a notional value of $260.0 million was $2.5$5.8 million. The potential loss in fair value for such financial instruments from a 10 percent adverse change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates would be $4.2These swaps mature as follows: $25.0 million aton March 31, 2020, $35.0 million on December 31, 2017.

At2020, $50.0 million on September 30, 2022 and $150.0 million on December 31, 2017,2022. In the fair value net asset for foreign currency exchange derivatives for the Zloty was $2.4 million. The potential loss in fair value for such financial instruments from a 10 percent adverse change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates would be $17.2 million at December 31, 2017.

Our business requires usfuture, we may again enter into interest rate swaps to settle transactions between currencies in both directions - i.e., pesoreduce interest rate volatility. However, we may not maintain interest rate swaps with respect to U.S. dollarall of our variable rate indebtedness, and vice versa. To the greatest extent possible, we attempt to match the timing and magnitude of transaction settlements between currencies to create a “natural hedge.” For 2017, we had a $12.9 million net gain on foreign exchange transactions related to the Peso, Euro and Zloty. The net imbalance between currencies depends on many factors including but not limited to, the company’s business model, location of production operations and associated currencies, and geographic distribution of sales activity and associated currencies. While changes in the terms of the contracts with our customers may create an imbalance between currencies that we are hedging with foreign currency forward contracts, there can be no assurances that our hedging program will effectively offset the impact of the imbalance between currencies or that the net transaction balance will not change significantly in the future.

Commodity Purchase Commitments. When market conditions warrant,any swaps we enter into purchase commitments to secure the supply of certain commodities used in the manufacture ofmay not fully mitigate our products, such as aluminum, natural gas and other raw materials. However, we do not enter into derivatives or other financial instrument transactions for speculative purposes. At December 31, 2017, we had no purchase commitments in place for the delivery of

interest rate risk.

31


aluminum, natural gas or other raw materials. However, our European business has entered into forward contracts to hedge price fluctuations in its aluminum raw materials. At December 31, 2017 the fair value asset relating to forward contracts for aluminum was $1.8 million. The change in fair value for such financial instruments from a 10 percent adverse change in market price for aluminum would be $1.6 million at December 31, 2017.

See the section captioned “Risk Management” in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a further discussion about the market risk we face.

32


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Superior Industries International, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Superior Industries International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20172019 and December 25, 2016,2018, the related consolidated income statements, statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the periodsperiod ended December 31, 2017, December 25, 2016, and December 27, 2015,2019, and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”"financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172019 and December 25, 2016,2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the periodsperiod ended December 31, 2017, December 25, 2016, and December 27, 2015,2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 15, 2018,February 28, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’sCompany's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Detroit, Michigan

March 15, 2018February 28, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2009.

33


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Superior Industries International, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Superior Industries International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control -IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2019, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, of the Company and our report dated March 15, 2018,February 28, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Uniwheels AG, which was acquired on May 30, 2017 and whose financial statements constitute 32.8 percent of total assets (excluding goodwill and intangibles which are included within the scope of management’s assessment) and 33.9 percent of net sales of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at Uniwheels AG.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Detroit, Michigan

March 15, 2018

February 28, 2020

34


SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

  2017 2016 2015 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

NET SALES

  $1,108,055  $732,677  $727,946 

 

$

1,372,487

 

 

$

1,501,827

 

 

$

1,108,055

 

Cost of sales:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of sales

   1,005,020  645,015  650,717 

 

 

1,256,425

 

 

 

1,338,300

 

 

 

1,005,158

 

Restructuring costs (Note 3)

   138  1,458  6,012 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 
   1,005,158  646,473  656,729 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

GROSS PROFIT

   102,897  86,204  71,217 

 

 

116,062

 

 

 

163,527

 

 

 

102,897

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   81,379  31,602  34,923 

 

 

63,883

 

 

 

77,722

 

 

 

81,379

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

INCOME FROM OPERATIONS

   21,518  54,602  36,294 

Interest (expense) income, net

   (40,004 245  103 

Other income (expense), net

   13,188  (126 (1,114

Change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative liability

   6,164   —     —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

CONSOLIDATED INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   866  54,721  35,283 

Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles

 

 

102,238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS

 

 

(50,059

)

 

 

85,805

 

 

 

21,518

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

(47,011

)

 

 

(50,097

)

 

 

(40,004

)

Other (expense) income, net

 

 

4,815

 

 

 

(6,936

)

 

 

13,188

 

Change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative

 

 

(782

)

 

 

3,480

 

 

 

6,164

 

CONSOLIDATED INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

 

(93,037

)

 

 

32,252

 

 

 

866

 

Income tax provision

   (6,875 (13,340 (11,339

 

 

(3,423

)

 

 

(6,291

)

 

 

(6,875

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME (LOSS)

   (6,009 41,381  23,944 

 

 

(96,460

)

 

 

25,961

 

 

 

(6,009

)

Less: Net income attributable tonon-controlling interest

   (194  —     —   
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Less: net (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(194

)

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO SUPERIOR

  $(6,203 $41,381  $23,944 

 

$

(96,460

)

 

$

25,961

 

 

$

(6,203

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO SUPERIOR – BASIC

  $(1.01 $1.63  $0.90 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO SUPERIOR – DILUTED

  $(1.01 $1.62  $0.90 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE – BASIC

 

$

(5.10

)

 

$

0.29

 

 

$

(1.01

)

EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE – DILUTED

 

$

(5.10

)

 

$

0.29

 

 

$

(1.01

)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

35


SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

   2017   2016   2015 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Superior

  $(6,203 $41,381  $23,944 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:

    

Foreign currency translation gain (loss)

   29,822   (16,904  (16,810

Change in unrecognized gains (losses) on derivative instruments:

    

Change in fair value of derivatives

   14,067   (11,062  (7,189

Tax benefit (provision)

   (6,464  4,250   2,665 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Change in unrecognized gains (losses) on derivative instruments, net of tax

   7,603   (6,812  (4,524

Defined benefit pension plan:

    

Actuarial (losses) gains on pension obligation, net of curtailments and amortization

   (1,931  799   1,807 

Tax benefit (provision)

   310   (295  (761
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Pension changes, net of tax

   (1,621  504   1,046 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

   35,804   (23,212  (20,288
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Comprehensive income attributable to Superior

  $29,601  $18,169  $3,656 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Superior

 

$

(96,460

)

 

$

25,961

 

 

$

(6,203

)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation (loss) gain

 

 

(5,168

)

 

 

(23,924

)

 

 

29,822

 

Change in unrecognized gains on derivative instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of derivatives

 

 

17,515

 

 

 

7,221

 

 

 

14,067

 

Tax provision

 

 

(4,359

)

 

 

(1,928

)

 

 

(6,464

)

Change in unrecognized gains on derivative instruments,

   net of tax

 

 

13,156

 

 

 

5,293

 

 

 

7,603

 

Defined benefit pension plan:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial gains (losses) on pension obligation, net of curtailments and

   amortization

 

 

(4,086

)

 

 

2,924

 

 

 

(1,931

)

Tax (provision) benefit

 

 

1,515

 

 

 

(667

)

 

 

310

 

Pension changes, net of tax

 

 

(2,571

)

 

 

2,257

 

 

 

(1,621

)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

5,417

 

 

 

(16,374

)

 

 

35,804

 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Superior

 

$

(91,043

)

 

$

9,587

 

 

$

29,601

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

36


SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

  2017 2016 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

ASSETS

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $46,360  $57,786 

 

$

77,927

 

 

$

47,464

 

Short-term investments

  ��750  750 

 

 

 

 

 

750

 

Accounts receivable, net

   160,167  99,331 

 

 

76,786

 

 

 

104,649

 

Inventories

   173,999  82,837 

Inventories, net

 

 

168,470

 

 

 

175,578

 

Income taxes receivable

   6,929  3,682 

 

 

4,630

 

 

 

6,791

 

Other current assets

   29,178  9,695 

 

 

26,375

 

 

 

35,189

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total current assets

   417,383  254,081 

 

 

354,188

 

 

 

370,421

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   536,686  227,403 

 

 

529,282

 

 

 

532,767

 

Investment in unconsolidated affiliate

   —    2,000 

Non-current deferred income tax assets, net

   54,302  28,838 

 

 

38,607

 

 

 

42,105

 

Goodwill

   304,805   —   

 

 

184,832

 

 

 

291,434

 

Intangibles

   203,473   —   

Intangibles, net

 

 

137,078

 

 

 

168,369

 

Othernon-current assets

   34,603  30,434 

 

 

67,880

 

 

 

46,520

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total assets

  $1,551,252  $542,756 

 

$

1,311,867

 

 

$

1,451,616

 

  

 

  

 

 

LIABILITIES, MEZZANINE EQUITY AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

  $118,424  $37,856 

 

$

123,112

 

 

$

107,274

 

Short-term debt

   4,000   —   

 

 

4,010

 

 

 

3,052

 

Accrued expenses

   68,786  46,315 

 

 

60,845

 

 

 

65,662

 

Income taxes payable

   3,849  1,793 

 

 

3,148

 

 

 

2,475

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total current liabilities

   195,059  85,964 

 

 

191,115

 

 

 

178,463

 

Long-term debt (less current portion)

   679,552   —   

 

 

611,025

 

 

 

661,426

 

Embedded derivative liability

   4,685   —   

 

 

3,916

 

 

 

3,134

 

Non-current income tax liabilities

   5,731  5,301 

 

 

6,523

 

 

 

9,046

 

Non-current deferred income tax liabilities, net

   28,539  3,628 

 

 

12,369

 

 

 

18,664

 

Othernon-current liabilities

   47,269  49,637 

 

 

67,724

 

 

 

49,306

 

Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 21)

   —     —   

Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 20)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mezzanine equity:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Authorized - 1,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding - 150,000 shares (no shares at December 31, 2016)

   144,694   —   

Authorized - 1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding - 150,000 shares

outstanding at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018

 

 

160,980

 

 

 

144,463

 

European non-controlling redeemable equity

 

 

6,525

 

 

 

13,849

 

Shareholders’ equity:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Authorized - 100,000,000 shares

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issued and outstanding - 24,917,025 shares (25,143,950 shares at December 31, 2016)

   89,755  89,916 

Issued and outstanding - 25,128,158 and 25,019,237 shares at

December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018

 

 

93,331

 

 

 

87,723

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (89,121 (124,925

 

 

(100,078

)

 

 

(105,495

)

Retained earnings

   393,146  433,235 

 

 

258,437

 

 

 

391,037

 

  

 

  

 

 

Superior shareholders’ equity

   393,780  398,226 

Noncontrolling interests

   51,943   —   
  

 

  

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   445,723  398,226 

 

 

251,690

 

 

 

373,265

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities, mezzanine equity and shareholders’ equity

  $1,551,252  $542,756 

 

$

1,311,867

 

 

$

1,451,616

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

37


SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

        Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Retained
Earnings
  Total 
   Unrecognized
Gains/Losses
on Derivative
Instruments
  Pension
Obligations
  Cumulative
Translation
Adjustment
   
       
       
       
  Common Stock      
 Number of
Shares
  Amount      

BALANCE AT FISCAL YEAR END 2014

  26,730,247  $81,473  $(4,765 $(5,186 $(71,474 $438,958  $439,006 

Net income

  —     —     —     —     —     23,944   23,944 

Change in unrecognized gains/losses on derivative instruments, net of tax

  —     —     (4,524  —     —     —     (4,524

Change in employee benefit plans, net of taxes

  —     —     —     1,046   —     —     1,046 

Net foreign currency translation adjustment

  —     —     —     —     (16,810  —     (16,810

Stock options exercised

  420,642   7,265   —     —     —     —     7,265 

Restricted stock awards granted, net of forfeitures

  4,960   —     —     —     —     —     —   

Stock-based compensation expense

  —     2,807   —     —     —     —     2,807 

Tax impact of stock options

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Common stock repurchased

  (1,056,954  (3,437  —     —     —     (16,201  (19,638

Cash dividends declared ($0.72 per share)

  —     —     —     —     —     (19,184  (19,184
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

BALANCE AT FISCAL YEAR END 2015

  26,098,895  $88,108  $(9,289 $(4,140 $(88,284 $427,517  $413,912 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive

Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized

Gains (Losses)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

on Derivative

Instruments

 

 

Pension

Obligations

 

 

Translation

Adjustment

 

 

Retained

Earnings

 

 

Controlling

Interest

 

 

Total

 

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2016

 

 

25,143,950

 

 

$

89,916

 

 

$

(16,101

)

 

$

(3,636

)

 

$

(105,188

)

 

$

433,235

 

 

$

 

 

$

398,226

 

Consolidated net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6,203

)

 

 

194

 

 

 

(6,009

)

Change in unrecognized gains/losses on

   derivative instruments, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,603

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,603

 

Change in employee benefit plans, net of

   taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,621

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,621

)

Net foreign currency translation

   adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,822

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,267

 

 

 

34,089

 

Stock options exercised

 

 

2,000

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41

 

Common stock issued, net of shares

   withheld for employee taxes

 

 

(13,084

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

889

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

889

 

Common stock repurchased

 

 

(215,841

)

 

 

(777

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4,237

)

 

 

 

 

 

(5,014

)

Cash dividends declared ($0.45 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,737

)

 

 

 

 

 

(10,737

)

Redeemable preferred dividend and

   accretion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(18,912

)

 

 

 

 

 

(18,912

)

Non-controlling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63,200

 

 

 

63,200

 

UNIWHEELS AG additional tenders

 

 

 

 

 

(314

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15,718

)

 

 

(16,032

)

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2017

 

 

24,917,025

 

 

$

89,755

 

 

$

(8,498

)

 

$

(5,257

)

 

$

(75,366

)

 

$

393,146

 

 

$

51,943

 

 

$

445,723

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

38


SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

        Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Retained
Earnings
  Total 
   Unrecognized
Gains/Losses
on Derivative
Instruments
  Pension
Obligations
  Cumulative
Translation
Adjustment
   
       
       
       
  Common Stock      
 Number of
Shares
  Amount      

BALANCE AT FISCAL YEAR END 2015

  26,098,895  $88,108  $(9,289 $(4,140 $(88,284 $427,517  $413,912 

Net income

  —     —     —     —     —     41,381   41,381 

Change in unrecognized gains/losses on derivative instruments, net of tax

  —     —     (6,812  —     —     —     (6,812

Change in employee benefit plans, net of taxes

  —     —     —     504   —     —     504 

Net foreign currency translation adjustment

  —     —     —     —     (16,904  —     (16,904

Stock options exercised

  86,908   1,641   —     —     —     —     1,641 

Restricted stock awards granted, net of forfeitures

  (1,165  —     —     —     —     —     —   

Stock-based compensation expense

  —     3,618   —     —     —     —     3,618 

Tax impact of stock options

  —     92   —     —     —     —     92 

Common stock repurchased

  (1,040,688  (3,543  —     —     —     (17,176  (20,719

Cash dividends declared ($0.72 per share)

  —     —     —     —     —     (18,487  (18,487
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

BALANCE AT FISCAL YEAR END 2016

  25,143,950  $89,916  $(16,101 $(3,636 $(105,188 $433,235  $398,226 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Gains (Losses)

on Derivative

Instruments

 

 

Pension

Obligations

 

 

Cumulative

Translation

Adjustment

 

 

Retained

Earnings

 

 

Non-

controlling

Interest

 

 

Total

 

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2017

 

 

24,917,025

 

 

$

89,755

 

 

$

(8,498

)

 

$

(5,257

)

 

$

(75,366

)

 

$

393,146

 

 

$

51,943

 

 

$

445,723

 

Consolidated net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,961

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,961

 

Change in unrecognized gains/losses

   on derivative instruments, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,293

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,293

 

Change in employee benefit plans, net

   of taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,257

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,257

 

Net foreign currency translation

   adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(23,924

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(23,924

)

Stock options exercised

 

 

4,500

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68

 

Common stock issued, net of shares

   withheld for employee taxes

 

 

97,712

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

1,525

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,525

 

Cash dividends declared ($0.36 per

   share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,353

)

 

 

 

 

 

(9,353

)

Redeemable preferred dividend and

   accretion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(32,462

)

 

 

 

 

 

(32,462

)

Preferred stock modification

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,257

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,257

 

Reclassification to European non-

   controlling redeemable equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(51,943

)

 

 

(51,943

)

Adjust European non-controlling

   redeemable equity to redemption

   value

 

 

 

 

 

(3,625

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,625

)

European non-controlling redeemable

   equity dividend

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,512

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,512

)

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2018

 

 

25,019,237

 

 

$

87,723

 

 

$

(3,205

)

 

$

(3,000

)

 

$

(99,290

)

 

$

391,037

 

 

$

 

 

$

373,265

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

39


SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

        Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Retained
Earnings
  Non-
Controlling
Interest
  Total 
   Unrecognized
Gains/Losses
on Derivative
Instruments
  Pension
Obligations
  Cumulative
Translation
Adjustment
    
        
        
        
  Common Stock       
 Number of
Shares
  Amount       

BALANCE AT FISCAL YEAR END 2016

  25,143,950  $89,916  $(16,101 $(3,636 $(105,188 $433,235  $—    $398,226 

Consolidated net income (loss)

  —     —     —     —     —     (6,203  194   (6,009

Change in unrecognized gains/losses on derivative instruments, net of tax

  —     —     7,603   —     —     —     —     7,603 

Change in employee benefit plans, net of taxes

  —     —     —     (1,621  —     —     —     (1,621

Net foreign currency translation adjustment

  —     —     —     —     29,822   —     4,267   34,089 

Stock options exercised

  2,000   41   —     —     —     —     —     41 

Restricted stock awards granted, net of forfeitures

  (13,084  —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Stock-based compensation expense

  —     889   —     —     —     —     —     889 

Common stock repurchased

  (215,841  (777  —     —     —     (4,237  —     (5,014

Cash dividends declared

  —     —     —     —     —     (10,737  —     (10,737

($0.45 per share)

       

Redeemable preferred dividend and accretion

  —     —     —     —     —     (18,912  —     (18,912

Non-controlling interest

  —     —     —     —     —     —     63,200   63,200 

Uniwheels additional tenders

  —     (314  —     —     —     —     (15,718  (16,032
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

BALANCE AT FISCAL YEAR END 2017

  24,917,025  $89,755  $(8,498 $(5,257 $(75,366 $393,146  $51,943  $445,723 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

Common Stock

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Gains (Losses)

on Derivative

Instruments

 

 

Pension

Obligations

 

 

Cumulative

Translation

Adjustment

 

 

Retained

Earnings

 

 

Total

 

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2018

 

 

25,019,237

 

 

$

87,723

 

 

$

(3,205

)

 

$

(3,000

)

 

$

(99,290

)

 

$

391,037

 

 

$

373,265

 

Consolidated net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(96,460

)

 

 

(96,460

)

Change in unrecognized gains/losses

   on derivative instruments, net of

   tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,156

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,156

 

Change in employee benefit plans, net

   of taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,571

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,571

)

Net foreign currency translation

   adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,168

)

 

 

 

 

 

(5,168

)

Common stock issued, net of shares

   withheld for employee taxes

 

 

108,921

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

5,608

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,608

 

Cash dividends declared ($0.18 per

   share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4,597

)

 

 

(4,597

)

Redeemable preferred dividend and

   accretion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(30,977

)

 

 

(30,977

)

European non-controlling redeemable

   equity dividend

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(566

)

 

 

(566

)

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2019

 

 

25,128,158

 

 

$

93,331

 

 

$

9,951

 

 

$

(5,571

)

 

$

(104,458

)

 

$

258,437

 

 

$

251,690

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

40


SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

  2017 2016 2015 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

  $(6,009 $41,381  $23,944 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Consolidated net income (loss)

 

$

(96,460

)

 

$

25,961

 

 

$

(6,009

)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

   69,335  34,261  34,530 

 

 

100,722

 

 

 

95,056

 

 

 

69,335

 

Income tax,non-cash changes

   (3,395 (4,669 (9,531

 

 

(3,504

)

 

 

(1,048

)

 

 

(3,395

)

Impairments of long-lived assets and other charges

   —     —    2,688 

Impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles

 

 

102,238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation

   2,576  3,618  2,807 

 

 

5,716

 

 

 

2,131

 

 

 

2,576

 

Debt amortization

   7,328   —     —   

Amortization of debt issuance costs

 

 

4,843

 

 

 

3,868

 

 

 

7,328

 

Othernon-cash items

   1,133  812  1,400 

 

 

(714

)

 

 

5,733

 

 

 

1,133

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

   4,599  8,043  (14,030

 

 

26,737

 

 

 

42,829

 

 

 

4,599

 

Inventories

   (1,264 (22,339 11,509 

 

 

5,262

 

 

 

(6,125

)

 

 

(1,264

)

Other assets and liabilities

   (8,214 6,244  2,469 

 

 

7,424

 

 

 

(7,732

)

 

 

(8,214

)

Accounts payable

   1,411  15,880  (1,132

 

 

7,479

 

 

 

(9,132

)

 

 

1,411

 

Income taxes

   (3,790 (4,740 4,695 

 

 

3,099

 

 

 

4,575

 

 

 

(3,790

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

   63,710  78,491  59,349 

 

 

162,842

 

 

 

156,116

 

 

 

63,710

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to property, plant and equipment

   (70,937 (39,575 (39,543

 

 

(64,294

)

 

 

(77,697

)

 

 

(70,937

)

Acquisition of Uniwheels, net of cash acquired

   (706,733  —     —   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(706,733

)

Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments

   —    200  3,750 

 

 

 

 

 

600

 

 

 

 

Purchase of investments

   —     —    (950

Proceeds from sales of fixed assets

   56  4,337  1,815 

Other

   —     —    (18
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other investing activities

 

 

9,631

 

 

 

 

 

 

56

 

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

   (777,614 (35,038 (34,946

 

 

(54,663

)

 

 

(77,097

)

 

 

(777,614

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

   975,571   —     —   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

975,571

 

Proceeds from issuance of redeemable preferred shares

   150,000   —     —   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

150,000

 

Debt repayment

   (323,177  —     —   

Repayment of debt

 

 

(46,024

)

 

 

(7,936

)

 

 

(323,177

)

Cash dividends paid

   (19,473 (18,340 (19,082

 

 

(22,556

)

 

 

(28,816

)

 

 

(19,473

)

Purchase of non-controlling redeemable shares

 

 

(6,681

)

 

 

(39,048

)

 

 

 

Cash paid for common stock repurchase

   (5,014 (20,719 (19,638

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,014

)

Payments related to tax withholdings for stock-based compensation

   (1,687  —     —   

 

 

(108

)

 

 

(606

)

 

 

(1,687

)

Net increase (decrease) in short term debt

   (10,877  —     —   

Net decrease in short term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,877

)

Proceeds from borrowings on revolving credit facility

   71,750   —     —   

 

 

114,040

 

 

 

324,450

 

 

 

71,750

 

Repayments of borrowings on revolving credit facility

   (100,650  —     —   

 

 

(114,040

)

 

 

(324,450

)

 

 

(100,650

)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

   41  1,641  7,265 

 

 

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

41

 

Redeemable preferred shares issuance costs

   (3,737  —     —   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,737

)

Financing costs paid

   (31,640  —     —   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(31,640

)

Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options

   —    91  107 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES

   701,107  (37,327 (31,348
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other financing activities

 

 

(1,230

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

(76,599

)

 

 

(76,338

)

 

 

701,107

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

   1,371  (376 (3,470

 

 

(1,117

)

 

 

(1,577

)

 

 

1,371

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (11,426 5,750  (10,415

 

 

30,463

 

 

 

1,104

 

 

 

(11,426

)

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period

   57,786  52,036  62,451 

 

 

47,464

 

 

 

46,360

 

 

 

57,786

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

  $46,360  $57,786  $52,036 

 

$

77,927

 

 

$

47,464

 

 

$

46,360

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

41


SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 20172019

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations

Headquartered in Southfield, Michigan, the principal business of Superior Industries International, Inc. (referred to herein as “Superior”, the “Company”, “Superior”, or “we,” “us” and “our”) is the designdesigns and manufacture ofmanufactures aluminum wheels for sale to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”). and aftermarket customers. We are one of the largest suppliers of cast aluminum wheels to the world’s leading automobile and light truck manufacturers, with manufacturing operations in the United States, Mexico, Germany and Poland. Customers inOur OEM aluminum wheels are sold primarily for factory installation, as either standard equipment or optional equipment, on vehicle models manufactured by BMW-Mini, Daimler AG Company (Mercedes-Benz, AMG, Smart), FCA, Ford, GM, Jaguar-Land Rover, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Nissan, PSA, Subaru, Suzuki, Toyota, VW Group (Volkswagen, Audi, Skoda, SEAT, Porsche, Bentley) and Volvo. We also sell aluminum wheels to the European aftermarket under the brands ATS, RIAL, ALUTEC and ANZIO. North America and Europe represent the principal markets for our products. On May 30, 2017,products, but we acquired Uniwheels,have a largeglobal presence and influence with North American, European supplier of OEM aluminum wheels, as well as a supplier of European aftermarket wheels, which we believe is viewed as one of the technological leaders in the market for alloy wheels. As a result of the Uniwheels acquisition, weand Asian OEMs. We have determined that our North American and European businessesoperations should be treated as separate reportableoperating segments in view of differences in economic circumstances, markets and customers as further described in Note 6, “Business Segments”.Segments.”

Presentation of Consolidated Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the companyCompany and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

We have made a numberAccounting estimates are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. These estimates require the use of judgments and assumptions related tothat affect the reportingreported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses to prepare these financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP as delineated by the FASB in its ASC. Generally, assets and liabilitiesperiods presented. We believe that the accounting estimates employed are subject to estimation and judgment include the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, amortization of preproduction costs, impairment ofappropriate and the estimated useful lives of our long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill, self-insurance portions of employee benefits, workers’ compensation and general liability programs, fair value of stock-based compensation, income tax liabilities and deferred income taxes. Whileresulting balances are reasonable; however, due to the inherent uncertainties in making estimates, actual results could differ we believe suchfrom the original estimates, requiring adjustments to be reasonable.

The fiscal year for 2017 consisted of the53-week period ended December 31, 2017 and the 2016 and 2015 fiscal years consisted of the52-week periods ended on December 25, 2016 and December 27, 2015, respectively. Historically our fiscal year ended on the last Sunday of the calendar year. Uniwheels, our European operation acquired on May 30, 2017, is reported on a calendar year end. These fiscal periods align as of December 31, 2017. Beginningthese balances in 2018, both our North American and European operations will be on a calendar fiscal year with each month ending on the last day of the calendar month. For convenience of presentation, all fiscal years are referred to as beginning as of January 1, and ending as of December 31, but actually reflect our financial position and results of operations for the periods described above.future periods.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents generally consist of cash, certificates of deposit, and fixed deposits and money market funds with original maturities of three months or less. Our cash and cash equivalents are not subject to significant interest rate risk due to the short maturities of these investments. Certificates of deposit and fixed deposits whose original maturity is greater than three months and is one year or less are classified as short-term investments and certificates of deposit and fixed deposits whose maturity is greater than one year at the balance sheet date are classified asnon-current assets in our consolidated balance sheets. The purchase of any certificates of deposit or fixed deposits that are classified as short-term investments ornon-current assets appear in the investing section of our consolidated statements of cash flows. At times throughout the year and atyear-end, cash balances held at financial institutions were in excess of federally insured limits.

Restricted Deposits

We purchase certificates of deposit that mature within twelve months and are used to secure or collateralize letters of credit securing our workers’ compensation obligations.investments. At December 31, 2017 and 2016,2018 certificates of deposit totaling $0.8 million were restricted in use (to collateralize letters of credit securing workers’ compensation obligations) and were classified as short-term investments on our consolidated balance sheet. There were no certificates of deposit at December 31, 2019.  

Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

In order to hedge exposure related to fluctuations in foreign currency rates and the cost of certain commodities used in the manufacture of our products, we periodically may purchase derivative financial instruments such as forward contracts, options or collars to offset or mitigate the impact of such fluctuations. Programs to hedge currency rate exposure may address ongoing transactions including, foreign-currency-denominated receivables and payables, as well as specific transactions related to purchase obligations. Programs to hedge exposure to commodity cost fluctuations would be based on underlying physical consumption of such commodity.

We account for our derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities and carry them at fair value. For derivative instruments that hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that are designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in shareholders’ equity and reclassified into income in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument, if any, is recognized in current income. To receive hedge accounting treatment, cash flow hedges must be highly effective in offsetting changes to expected future cash flows on hedged transactions. For forward exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges,(including changes in the time value are included in the definition of hedge effectiveness. Accordingly, any gains or losses related to this component arefor forward contracts) is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in shareholders’ equity and reclassified into income in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Derivatives that do not qualify or have not been designated as hedges are adjusted to fair value through current income. SeeRefer to Note 5, “Derivative Financial Instruments” for additional information pertaining to our derivative instruments.

We enter into contracts to purchase certain commodities used in the manufacture of our products, such as aluminum, natural gas and other raw materials. These contracts are considered to be derivative instruments under U.S. GAAP. However, upon entering into these contracts, we expect to fulfill our purchase commitments and take full delivery of the contracted quantities of these commodities during the normal course of business. Accordingly, under U.S. GAAP,GAAP; however, these purchase contracts are not accounted for as derivatives because they qualify for the normal purchase normal sale exception under U.S. GAAP, unless there is a change in the facts or circumstances that causes management to believe that these commitments would not be used in the normal course of business. See Note 20, “Risk Management” for additional information pertaining to these purchase commitments.exemption.

Cash Paid for Interest and Taxes andNon-Cash Investing Activities42

Cash paid for interest was $24.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. Cash paid for income taxes was $11.1 million, $21.9 million and $12.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

As of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, $15.1 million, $4.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of equipment had been purchased but not yet paid for and are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheets.


Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable primarily consists of amounts that are due and payable from our customers for the sale of aluminum wheels. We maintainevaluate the collectability of receivables each reporting period and record an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based uponrepresenting our estimate of probable losses. Additions to the expected collectability of all trade receivables. The allowance is reviewed continuallyare charged to bad debt expense reported in selling, general and adjusted for amounts deemed uncollectible by management.administrative expense.

InventoriesInventory

Inventories, which are categorized as raw materials,work-in-process or finished goods, are stated at the lower of cost or marketnet realizable value. The cost of inventories is measured using thefirst-in,first-out FIFO (first-in, first-out) method or the average cost method. When necessary, management uses estimatesInventories are reviewed to determine if inventory quantities are in excess of net realizable value to record inventory reserves for obsolete and/forecasted usage or slow-moving inventory.if they have become obsolete. Aluminum is the primary material component in our inventories. Our aluminum requirements have historically been supplied from twoCurrently our three primary vendors each accounting for more than 10 percent of our aluminum purchases during 2016 and 2015. During 2017, we added an additional vendor and we added the suppliers from our European operations.    Despite the diversification of aluminum vendors, the two primary vendors still mademake up more than 10 percent of our aluminum purchases in 2019, 2018 and 2017.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. The cost of additions, improvements and interest during construction, if any, are capitalized. Our maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense when incurred. Depreciation is calculated generally on the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets.

 

Classification

Expected Useful Life

Computer equipment

3 to 5 years

Production machinery and technical equipment

3 to 20 years

Buildings

15 to 50 years

Other equipment, operating and office equipment

3 to 20 years

When property, plant and equipment is replaced, retired or disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts. Property, plant and equipment no longer used in operations, which are generally insignificant in amount, are stated at the lower of costany resulting gain or estimated net realizable value. Gains and losses, if any, areloss is recorded as a component of operating income if the disposition relates to an operating asset. If anon-operating asset is disposedcost of any gains and losses are recorded insales or other income or expenseexpense.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The carrying amount of long-lived assets to be held and used in the periodbusiness is evaluated for impairment when events and circumstances warrant. If the carrying amount of disposition or write down.a long-lived asset group is considered impaired, a loss is recorded based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds fair value. Fair value is determined primarily using anticipated cash flows.

Preproduction Costs and Revenue Recognition Related to Long-Term Supply ArrangementsGoodwill

We incur preproduction engineering and tooling costs related to the products produced for our customers under long-term supply agreements. We expense all preproduction engineering costs for which reimbursementGoodwill is not contractually guaranteed by the customer or which are in excess of the contractually guaranteed reimbursement amount. We amortize the cost of the customer-owned tooling over the expected life of the wheel program on a straight-line basis. Also, we defer any reimbursements made to us by our customer and recognize the tooling reimbursement revenue over the same period in which the toolingamortized but is in use. Changes in the facts and circumstances of individual wheel programs may accelerate the amortization of both the cost of customer-owned tooling and the deferred tooling reimbursement revenues. Recognized tooling reimbursement revenues, which totaled $11.9 million, $8.0 million and $5.8 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are included in net sales in the consolidated income statements. The following tables summarize the unamortized customer-owned

tooling costs included in our othernon-current assets, and the deferred tooling revenues included in accrued expenses and othernon-current liabilities:

December 31,

  2017   2016 
(Dollars in Thousands)        

Customer-Owned Tooling Costs

    

Preproduction costs

  $84,198   $78,299 

Accumulated amortization

   (71,409   (65,100
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net preproduction costs

  $12,789   $13,199 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred Tooling Revenue

    

Accrued expenses

  $4,654   $5,419 

Othernon-current liabilities

   1,974    2,593 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tooling revenue

  $6,628   $8,012 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Impairment of Goodwill

Goodwill must be tested for impairment on at least an annual basis, and as of an interim periodbasis. Impairment testing is required more often than annually if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment is more likely than not to have occurred. In conducting our annual impairment testing, we may first perform a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. If not, no further goodwill impairment testing is performed. If it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount, or if we elect not to perform a qualitative assessment of a reporting unit, we compare the fair value of the reporting unit to the related net book value. If the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is measured and recognized. We conduct our annual impairment testing as of December 31 of each year.

31. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Investments

In accordance with ASC 360 entitled “Property, Plant and Equipment”, management evaluates the recoverability and estimated remaining lives of long-lived assets. The company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed.

When facts and circumstances indicate that there may have been a loss in value, management will also evaluate its cost method investmentscharges, if any, related to determine whether there was an other-than-temporary impairment. If a loss in the value of the investment is determined to be other than temporary, then the decline in value is recognizedgoodwill are recorded as a loss.separate charge included in income from operations. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $99.5 million relating to our European reporting unit (refer to Note 10, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”).

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets include both finite and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Finite-lived intangible assets consist of brand names, technology and customer relationships. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line over their estimated useful lives (since the pattern in which the asset will be consumed cannot be reliably determined). Indefinite-lived intangible assets, excluding goodwill, consist of trade names associated with our aftermarket business.  Impairment charges, if any, related to intangible assets are recorded as a separate charge included in income from operations. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we recognized an indefinite-lived intangible impairment charge of $2.7 million relating to trade names used in our European aftermarket business (refer to Note 10, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”).

43


Foreign Currency Transactions and Translation

We have wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries with operations in Mexico and Europe whose functional currency is the peso and Euro, respectively. In addition, we have operations with U.S. dollar functional currency with transactions denominated in pesos and other currencies and operations in Europe with Euro functional currency with transactions denominated in Polish Zlotys and other currencies. These operations had monetaryThe assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries that were denominateduse local currency as their functional currency are translated to U.S. dollars based on the current exchange rate prevailing at each balance sheet date and any resulting translation adjustments are included in currencies that were different thanaccumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries whose local currency is not their functional currency are remeasured from their local currency to their functional currency and werethen translated to U.S. dollars. Revenues and expenses are translated into the functional currency of the entityU.S. dollars using the average exchange rate in effect at the end ofrates prevailing for each accounting period. Any gainsperiod presented.

Gains and losses recorded as a resultarising from foreign currency transactions and the effects of remeasurement discussed in the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities into the functional currencypreceding paragraph are reflected as transaction gains and losses and includedrecorded in other expense, net in the consolidated income statements.(expense), net. We had foreign currency transaction gains (losses) of $0.5 million, ($1.0) million, and $12.9 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, and losses of $0.4 million and $1.2 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are included in other income (expense), net in the consolidated income statements. In addition, we had a minority investment in India that had a functional currency of the Indian rupee which was divested in September 2017.

When our foreign subsidiaries translate their financial statements from the functional currency to the reporting currency, the balance sheet accounts are translated using the exchange rates in effect at the end of the accounting period and retained earnings is translated using historical rates. The income statement accounts are generally translated at the weighted average of exchange rates during the period and the cumulative effect of translation is recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in shareholders’ equity, as reflected in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity. The value of the Mexican peso and Euro increased 5.1 percent and 7.2 percent, respectively, in relation to the U.S. dollar, while the Zloty remained essentially flat in relation to the Euro in 2017.respectively.

Revenue Recognition

SalesOn January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2014-09, Topic ASC 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” Under this new standard, revenue is recognized when performance obligations under our contracts are satisfied. Generally, this occurs upon shipment when control of products and any related costs are recognized when title and risk of loss transfers to our customers. At this point, revenue is recognized in an amount reflecting the purchaser,consideration we expect to be entitled to under the terms of our contract.

The Company maintains long term business relationships with our OEM customers and aftermarket distributors; however, there are no definitive long-term volume commitments under these arrangements. Volume commitments are limited to near-term customer requirements authorized under purchase orders or production releases generally uponwith delivery periods of less than a month. Sales do not involve any significant financing component since customer payment is generally due 40-60 days after shipment. Tooling reimbursementContract assets and liabilities consist of customer receivables and deferred revenues related to initialtooling.

At contract inception, the Company assesses goods and services promised in its contracts with customers and identifies a performance obligation for each promise to deliver a good or service (or bundle of goods or services) that is distinct. Principal performance obligations under our customer contracts consist of the manufacture and delivery of aluminum wheels, including production wheels, service wheels and replacement wheels. As a part of the manufacture of the wheels, we develop tooling reimbursed bynecessary to produce the wheels. Accordingly, tooling costs, which are explicitly recoverable from our customers, are deferredcapitalized as preproduction costs and recognizedamortized to cost of sales over the expectedaverage life of the vehicle wheel programprogram. Similarly, customer reimbursement for tooling costs is deferred and amortized to net sales over the average life of the vehicle wheel program.

In the normal course of business, the Company’s warranties are limited to product specifications and the Company does not accept product returns unless the item is defective as manufactured. Accordingly, warranty costs are treated as a cost of fulfillment subject to accrual, rather than a performance obligation. The Company establishes provisions for both estimated returns and warranties when revenue is recognized. In addition, the Company does not typically provide customers with the right to a refund but provides for product replacement.

Prices allocated to production, service and replacement wheels are based on prices established in our customer purchase orders which represent the standalone selling price. Prices for service and replacement wheels are commensurate with production wheels with adjustment for any special packaging. In addition, prices are subject to adjustment for changes in commodity prices for certain raw materials, aluminum and silicon, as well as production efficiencies and wheel weight variations from specifications used in pricing. These price adjustments are treated as variable consideration. Customer tooling reimbursement is generally based on quoted prices or cost not to exceed quoted prices.

We estimate variable consideration by using the “most likely” amount estimation approach. For commodity prices, initial estimates are based on the commodity index at contract inception. Changes in commodity prices are monitored and revenue is adjusted as changes in the commodity index occur. Prices incorporate the wheel weight price component based on product specifications. Weights are monitored, and prices are adjusted as variations arise. Price adjustments due to production efficiencies are generally recognized as and when negotiated with customers. Customer contract prices are generally adjusted quarterly to incorporate price adjustments.

Under the Company’s policies, shipping costs are treated as a straight-line basis,cost of fulfillment. In addition, as discussed above.

Research and Development

Research and development costs (primarily engineeringpermitted under a practical expedient relating to disclosure of performance obligations, the Company does not disclose remaining performance obligations under its contracts since contract terms are substantially less than a year (generally less than one month). Our revenue recognition practices and related costs)transactions and balances are expensed as incurred and are includedfurther described in cost of sales in the consolidated income statements. Amounts expensed during 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $7.7 million, $3.8 million and $2.6 million, respectively.Note 3, “Revenue.”

Value-Added Taxes44

Value-added taxes that are collected from customers and remitted to taxing authorities are excluded from sales and cost of sales.


Stock-Based Compensation

We account for stock-based compensation using the estimated fair value recognition method in accordance with U.S. GAAP.method. We recognize these compensation costs net of the applicable forfeiture rate and recognize the compensation costson a straight-line basis for only those shares expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting term of three to four years. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on our historical experience. SeeRefer to Note 18,19, “Stock-Based Compensation” for additional information concerning our share-basedstock-based compensation awards.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. The asset and liability method requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences that currently exist between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of our assets and liabilities. We calculate current and deferred tax provisions based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from actual results reflected on the income tax returns filed during the following years. Adjustments based on filed returns are recorded when identified in the subsequent years.

The effect on deferred taxes for a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that the tax rate change is enacted. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred income tax assets when, in our judgment, based upon currently available information and other factors, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of such deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The determination of the need for a valuation allowance is based on anon-going evaluation of current information including, among other things, historical operating results, estimates of future earnings in different taxing

jurisdictions and the expected timing of the reversals of temporary differences. We believe that the determination to record a valuation allowance to reduce a deferred income tax asset is a significant accounting estimate because it is based, among other things, on an estimate of future taxable income in the U.S. and certain other jurisdictions, which is susceptible to change and may or may not occur, and because the impact of adjusting a valuation allowance may be material.

In determining when to release the valuation allowance established against our net deferred income tax assets, we consider all available evidence, both positive and negative. Consistent with our policy, the valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax assets will not be reversed until such time as we have generated three years of cumulativepre-tax income and have reached sustained profitability, which we define as two consecutive one year periods ofpre-tax income.

We account for uncertain tax positions utilizing atwo-step approach to evaluate tax positions. Step one, recognition, requires evaluation of the tax position to determine if based solely on technical merits it is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. Step two, measurement, is addressed only if a position is more likely than not to be sustained. In step two, the tax benefit is measured as the largest amount of benefit, determined on a cumulative probability basis, which ismore-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement with tax authorities. If a position does not meet themore-likely-than-not threshold for recognition in step one, no benefit is recorded until the first subsequent period in which the more likely than not standard is met, the issue is resolved with the taxing authority, or the statute of limitations expires. Positions previously recognized are derecognized when we subsequently determine the position no longer is more likely than not to be sustained. Evaluation of tax positions, their technical merits, and measurements using cumulative probability are highly subjective management estimates. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

Presently, we have not recorded a deferred tax liability for temporary differences related to investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration. These temporary differences may become taxable upon a repatriation of earnings from the subsidiaries or a sale or liquidation of the subsidiaries. At this time the companyCompany does not have any plans to repatriate income from its foreign subsidiaries.

Earnings (Loss) Per ShareCash Paid for Interest and Taxes and Non-Cash Investing Activities

As summarized below, basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to Superior, less preferred dividends, by the weighted average number of common shares outstandingCash paid for interest was $42.3 million, $43.8 million and $24.3 million for the period. For purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share, net income is divided by the total of the weighted average shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect outstanding stock options and restricted stock under the treasury stock method, which includes consideration of stock-based compensation required by U.S. GAAP. The redeemable convertible preferred stock has been excluded from the weighted average shares since inclusion would be

antidilutive. Accordingly, preferred stock dividends (including accretion of the preferred stock redemption premium which has been treated as deemed dividends) have been deducted from net income.

Year Ended December 31,

  2017   2016   2015 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)            

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share

      

Net income (loss) attributable to Superior

  $(6,203  $41,381   $23,944 

Less: Redeemable preferred stock dividends and accretion

   (18,912   —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic Numerator

   (25,115   41,381    23,944 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic

   24,929    25,439    26,599 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic (loss) earnings per share

  $(1.01  $1.63   $0.90 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted Earnings Per Share

      

Net income (loss) attribute to Superior

  $(6,203  $41,381   $23,944 

Less: Redeemable preferred stock dividends and accretion

   (18,912   —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted Numerator

   (25,115   41,381    23,944 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding - basic

   24,929    25,439    26,599 

Weighted average dilutive stock options and restricted stock

   —      100    34 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted

   24,929    25,539    26,633 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted (loss) earnings per share

  $(1.01  $1.62   $0.90 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the yearyears ended December 31, 2017, no options or restricted stock were included in the diluted earnings per share calculation because to do so would have been anti-dilutive. All stock options2019, 2018 and restricted stock have been included in the diluted earnings per share calculations2017. Cash paid for income taxes was $9.0 million, $6.5 million and $11.1 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2016, but for the year ended December 31, 2015, we have excluded options to purchase 147,150 shares at prices ranging from $21.84 to $22.57 because exercise prices exceeded average market price2019, 2018, and as a consequence they were antidilutive. In addition, the performance shares discussed in Note 18, “Stock-Based Compensation” are not included in the diluted income per share because the performance metrics had not been met as2017.

As of December 31, 2017.2019, 2018 and 2017, $15.6 million, $10.3 million, and $15.1 million, respectively, of equipment had been purchased but not yet paid for and are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheets.

45


New Accounting PronouncementsStandards

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Topic 842, “Leases.” 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This update outlines a single, comprehensive model for accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. We plan to adopt this update onEffective January 1, 2018. The guidance permits two methods2019, we adopted ASU 2016-02, ASC 842 using the optional transition approach. Adoption of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (modified retrospective method). We will adopt the standard using the modified retrospective method. We have completed our assessment and do not expect that implementation will have a material effect on our financial position or resultsresulted in recognition of operations.

In February of 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-02, Leases (Topic 842)operating lease right-of-use (“ASU2016-02”ROU”). ASU2016-02 requires an entity to recognizeright-of-use assets and lease liabilities on its balance sheetof $18.2 million and disclose key information about leasing arrangements.$18.6 million, respectively, as well as a charge to eliminate previously deferred rent of $0.4 million, as of January 1, 2019. ASU2016-02 offers specific accounting guidance for a lessee, a lessor and sale and leaseback transactions. Lessees and lessors are required also requires lessees to disclose qualitative and quantitative information about leasing arrangements to enable a user of the financial statements to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. For public companies, Under the optional transition approach, financial statements for prior periods have not been restated and the disclosures applicable under the previous standard will be included for those periods. In adopting the standard, the Company has adopted the package of practical expedients. As a consequence, the Company has not reassessed (1) whether existing or expired contracts contain leases under the new definition of a lease, (2) lease classification for expired or existing leases (finance vs. operating) and (3) whether previously capitalized initial direct costs qualify for capitalization under the new standard. In addition, the Company has also adopted an accounting policy to exclude leases of less than one year from capitalization.

ASU 2018-02, “Income Statement — Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income2016-02: Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” In January, 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02 which gives entities the option to reclassify to retained earnings the tax effects resulting from the Tax Cut and Jobs Act (“the Act”) related to items in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) that the FASB refers to as having been stranded in AOCI. The new guidance may be applied retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the Act is recognized in the period of adoption. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2019. The guidance requires new disclosures regarding a company’s accounting policy for releasing tax effects in AOCI. The Company has elected to not reclassify the income tax effects of the Act from AOCI.

ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350).” ASU 2017-04 amends the requirement that entities compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount as part of a two-step goodwill impairment test under previously existing guidance. Under ASU 2017-04, in determining the amount of a goodwill impairment an entity will no longer calculate the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination (what is referred to as Step 2 under previously existing guidance). Under the new guidance, entities will perform their annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, an impairment will be recognized equal to the excess of the carrying amount over fair value not to exceed the total amount of goodwill. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period, and

requires a modified retrospective adoption,2019 with early adoption permitted. The Company early adopted this standard in conjunction with our annual goodwill impairment test conducted in the fourth quarter of 2019. Refer to Note 10, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles” for further discussion regarding the results of our annual goodwill impairment test for 2019.

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted

ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” In June 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments" (ASU 2016-13), which requires entities to use a new impairment model based on Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) rather than incurred losses. Under CECL, estimated credit losses would incorporate relevant information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts and any expected credit losses would be recognized at the time of sale. We are evaluating the impact this guidanceplan to adopt ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020. The Company does not expect that adoption will have any significant effect on our financial positionstatements or disclosures because we generally do not incur any significant credit losses due to the financial strength and resultscredit worthiness of operations.our customers.

ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement.” In August 2016,2018, the FASB issued an ASU entitled “Statement“Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement,” which is designed to improve the effectiveness of Cash Flows (Topic 740): Classification of Certain Cash Receiptsdisclosures by removing, modifying and Cash Payments.” The objective of the ASU isadding disclosures related to address the diversity in practice in the presentation of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our statement of cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued an ASU entitled “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The objective of the ASU is to simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Thismeasurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. EarlyThe ASU allows for early adoption is permitted.in any interim period after issuance of the update. We are evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our financial position and results of operations.statement disclosures.

ASU 2018-14, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans.”  In January 2017,August 2018, the FASB issued an ASU entitled “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying“Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General Subtopic 715-20 - Disclosure Framework - Changes to the DefinitionDisclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans,” which is designed to improve the effectiveness of a Business.” The objective of thedisclosures by removing and adding disclosures related to defined benefit plans. ASU is to add guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. This ASU2018-14 is effective for fiscal years beginningending after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We will apply this guidance2020. The new standard allows for early adoption in the future as applicable.

In March 2017, the FASB issued an ASU entitled “Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” The objectiveany year after issuance of the ASU is to improve the reporting of net benefit cost in the financial statements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.update. We are evaluating the impact this guidancenew standard will have on our financial position and results of operations.statement disclosures.

In July 2017, the FASB issued an ASU entitled “(Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception”. The objective of this ASU is to reduce the complexity in accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. When determining whether certain financial instruments should be classified as debt or equity instruments, a down round feature would no longer preclude equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. We are evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our financial position and results of operations.46


In August 2017, the FASB issued an ASU entitled “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815).” The objective of this standard is to better align financial reporting with risk management activities, provide a more faithful representation of hedging activities and reduce complexity and costs associated with hedging. This ASU removes the requirement to recognize hedge ineffectiveness in income prior to settlement, allows documentation of hedge effectiveness at inception to be completed byquarter-end, allows qualitative rather than quantitative assessment of effectiveness (subsequent to initial quantitative assessment), allows critical terms match for cash flow hedges of a group of forecasted transactions if derivatives mature within the same month as transactions, permits use of the “back up” long haul method for hedges initially designated using the short cut method and permits cash flow hedging of a component of purchases and sales ofnon-financial assets (i.e., commodity price excluding transportation) resulting in higher hedge effectiveness. The ASU also permits fair value hedging of the benchmark interest rate component of interest rate risk as well as partial term hedging, allows partial term fair value hedges of interest rate risk, permits cash flow hedging of interest rate risk for a contractually specified rate

rather than a benchmark rate and permits exclusion of cross currency basis spread in determining effectiveness. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our financial position and statement of operations.

On December 22, 2017, The Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118) to provide guidance regarding accounting and disclosure for tax effects arising from changes in tax regulations under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) enacted December 22, 2017. The Act contains significant changes to corporate taxation, including reduction in the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, aone-time transition tax on offshore earnings at reduced tax rates, elimination of U.S. tax on foreign dividends, new taxes on certain foreign earnings, a new minimum tax related to payments to foreign subsidiaries and affiliates, immediate deductions for certain new investments and the modification or repeal of many business deductions and credits. The Act will also have tax consequences for many companies that operate internationally. Generally, the SEC guidance directs companies to recognize income tax effects where requisite analysis can be completed prior to issuance of financial statements; estimate income tax effects where analysis is not yet complete but a reasonable estimate can be determined; and disclose effects where no reasonable estimate can be determined. The reasonable estimate would be reported as a provisional amount during a “measurement period.” In circumstances in which provisional amounts cannot be prepared, tax provisions should be determined based on tax laws in effect immediately prior to enactment of the Act. Disclosures should include tax effects for which accounting is incomplete; items reported as provisional amounts; current or deferred tax amounts for which the income tax effects of the Act have not been completed; the reason the initial accounting is incomplete; additional information needed to complete the accounting requirements under ASC Topic 740; nature and amount of any measurement period adjustments recognized during the reporting period; effect of measurement period adjustments on the effective tax rate; and the point at which accounting for the all tax effects of the Act has been completed. Refer to Note 14, “Income Taxes” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for additional information including the impact of the Act on our financial position and results of operations.

NOTE 2 - ACQUISITION

On March 23, 2017, Superior announced that it had entered into various agreements to commence a tender offer to acquire 100 percent of the outstanding equity interests of Uniwheels (the “Acquisition”) through a newly-formed, wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Acquisition Sub”). The Acquisition will be effected through a multi-step process as more fully described below.

In the first step of the Acquisition, on March 23, 2017, Superior obtained a commitment from the owner of approximately 61 percent of the outstanding stock of Uniwheels, Uniwheels Holding (Malta) Ltd. (the “Significant Holder”), evidenced by an irrevocable undertaking agreement (the “Undertaking Agreement”) to tender such stock in the second step of the Acquisition. In connection with the Undertaking Agreement, on March 23, 2017: (i) Superior entered into a business combination agreement with Uniwheels pursuant to which, subject to the provisions of the German Stock Corporation Act, Uniwheels and its subsidiaries undertook to, among other things, cooperate with the financing of the Acquisition; and (ii) Superior and the Significant Holder entered into a guarantee and indemnification agreement pursuant to which Superior will hold the Significant Holder harmless for claims that may arise relating to its involvement with Uniwheels. As Uniwheels was a company listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange, the Acquisition was required to be carried out in accordance with the Polish Act of 29 July 2005 on Public Offerings and the Conditions for Introducing Financial Instruments to Organized Trading and Public Companies (the “Public Offering Act”).

Following the publication of a formal tender offer document by Superior, as required by the Public Offering Act, Superior commenced the acceptance period for the tender offer (the “Tender Offer”) on April 12, 2017, pursuant to which Superior offered to purchase all (but not less than 75 percent) of the outstanding stock of Uniwheels and, upon the consummation of the Tender Offer, agreed to purchase the stock of the Significant Holder along with all other stock of Uniwheels tendered pursuant to the Tender Offer. On May 30, 2017, Superiorthe Company acquired 92.3 percent of the outstanding stock of UniwheelsUNIWHEELS AG (now referred to as our “Europe segment,” “Europe business”, “Europe operations” or “European operations”) for approximately $703.0 million (based on an exchange rate of 1.00 DollarU.S. dollar = 3.74193 Polish Zloty). We refer to this acquisition as the “First Step Acquisition.”

Under the terms of the Tender Offer:

the Significant Holder received cash consideration of Polish Zloty 226.5 per share; and

Uniwheels’ other shareholders received cash consideration of Polish Zloty 247.87 per share, equivalent to the volume weighted-average-price of Uniwheels’ shares for the three months prior to commencement of the Tender Offer, plus 5.0 percent.

via a tender offer. On June 30, 2017, the company announced that it hadCompany commenced the delisting and associated tender process for the remaining outstanding shares of Uniwheels. As of July 31, 2017, 153,251 additional shares (representing 1.2 percent of Uniwheels shares) were tendered at Polish Zloty 247.87 per share. On December 15, 2017, an additional 75,000 shares (representing 0.6 percent of Uniwheels shares) were tendered at Polish Zloty 262.50 per share.

Subsequently, Superior decided to pursuepursued a DPLTA, without concurrently pursuinga merger/squeeze-out. This was executedDomination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement (“DPLTA”) which became effective inon January 17, 2018, with retroactive effect as of January 1, 2018. This approach enables Superior to realize substantial synergies of a consolidated entity without the distraction or expense associated with simultaneously pursuing the purchase of the remaining shares. According to the terms ofUnder the DPLTA, Superior AGthe Company offered to purchase any further tendered shares for cash consideration of Euro 62.18, or approximately Polish Zloty 264 per share.62.18. This cash consideration may be subject to change based on appraisal proceedings that the minority shareholders of UniwheelsUNIWHEELS AG have initiated. Because the aggregate equity purchase price of the Acquisition (assuming an exchange rate of 1.00 DollarU.S. dollar = 3.74193 Polish Zloty) was determined at the time of the initial acquisition,tender offer, any increase in the resulting price must be reflected as a reduction to common stock. For each share that is not tendered, Superior will be obligated toof paid in capital (common stock). Each year beginning in 2019, the Company must pay a guaranteedan annual dividend of Euro 3.23 on any outstanding shares as long as the DPLTA is in effect. For any shares tendered prior to payment of the dividend each year, the Company must pay interest at a statutory rate, currently 4.12 percent, at the time the shares are redeemed. As of December 31, 2019, a total of 12,310,000 shares have been tendered and the Company now owns 99.3 percent of the outstanding shares of Superior Industries Europe AG (formerly Uniwheels AG).     

As a result of the effectiveness of the DPLTA as of January 1, 2018, the carrying value of the non-controlling interest related to UNIWHEELS AG common shares outstanding of $51.9 million, which was presented as a component of stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2017, was reclassified to European non-controlling redeemable equity during the first quarter of 2018. The non-controlling interest shares may be tendered at any time and are, therefore, immediately redeemable and must be classified outside stockholders’ equity. For the period of time that the DPLTA is in effect, beginningthe non-controlling interest will continue to be presented in 2019.European non-controlling redeemable equity outside of stockholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets.

The aggregate equity purchase price of the Acquisition (assuming the remaining shares of Uniwheels’ stock are acquired for cash consideration of Polish Zloty 247.87 per share, the price paid to Uniwheels’ shareholders in the Tender Offer, and an exchange rate of 1.00 Dollar = 3.74193 Polish Zloty) will be approximately $778.0 million, including the cost of shares which have not yet been tendered. We entered into foreign currency hedges prior to the closing of the First Step Acquisition intended to reduce currency risk associated with the settlement of the Tender Offer (the “Hedging Transactions”). The net benefit of such Hedging Transactions to Superior reduced the total anticipated purchase price of the Acquisition to $766.2 million.

The company’sCompany’s consolidated financial statements forinclude the year ended December 31, 2017 include Uniwheels results of our European operations subsequent to May 30, 2017 (please see Note 6, “Business Segments” for the segment results in 2017).2017. The company’sCompany’s consolidated financial statements reflect the purchase accounting adjustments in accordance with ASC 805 “Business Combinations”, whereby the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values on the acquisition date.

During the fourth quarter of 2017, the company obtained an updated valuation of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. The following is the preliminary allocation of the purchase price:

 

(Dollars in thousands)    

 

 

 

 

Estimated purchase price

  

 

 

 

 

Cash consideration

  $703,000 

 

$

703,000

 

  

 

 

Non-controlling interest

   63,200 

 

 

63,200

 

  

 

 

Preliminary purchase price allocation

  

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

   12,296 

 

 

12,296

 

Accounts receivable

   60,580 

 

 

60,580

 

Inventories

   83,901 

 

 

83,901

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   11,859 

 

 

11,859

 

  

 

 

Total current assets

   168,636 

 

 

168,636

 

Property and equipment

   259,784 

 

 

259,784

 

Intangible assets(1)

   205,000 

Intangible assets

 

 

205,000

 

Goodwill

   286,249 

 

 

286,249

 

Other assets

   32,987 

 

 

32,987

 

  

 

 

Total assets acquired

   952,656 

 

 

952,656

 

  

 

 

Accounts payable

   61,883 

 

 

61,883

 

Other current liabilities

   40,903 

 

 

40,903

 

  

 

 

Total current liabilities

   102,786 

 

 

102,786

 

Other long-term liabilities

   83,670 

 

 

83,670

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities assumed

   186,456 

 

 

186,456

 

  

 

 

Net assets acquired

  $766,200 

 

$

766,200

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Intangible assets are recorded at estimated fair value, as determined by management based on available information which includes a preliminary valuation prepared by an independent third party. The fair values assigned to identifiable intangible assets were determined through the use of the income approach, specifically the relief from royalty and multi-period excess earnings methods. The major assumptions used in arriving at the estimated identifiable intangible asset values included management’s estimates of future cash flows, discounted at an appropriate rate of return which are based on the weighted average cost of capital for both the company and other market participants. The useful lives for intangible assets were determined based upon the remaining useful economic lives of the intangible assets that are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to future cash flows. The estimated fair value of intangible assets and related useful lives as included in the preliminary purchase price allocation include:

47


Acquired intangible assets were recorded at estimated fair value, as determined through the use of the income approach, specifically the relief from royalty and multi-period excess earnings methods. The major assumptions used in arriving at the estimated identifiable intangible asset values included estimates of future cash flows, discounted at an appropriate rate of return which are based on the weighted average cost of capital for both the Company and other market participants. The useful lives for intangible assets were determined based upon the remaining useful economic lives of the intangible assets that are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to our future cash flows. The estimated fair value of intangible assets and related useful lives as included in the purchase price allocation are as follows:

 

Estimated
Fair Value
Estimated
Useful Life
(in Years)
(Dollars in thousands)

Brand name

$9,0004-6

Technology

15,0004-6

Customer relationships

167,0007-11

Trade names

14,000Indefinite

$205,000

 

 

Estimated

Fair Value

 

 

Estimated

Useful Life

(in Years)

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brand name

 

$

9,000

 

 

4-6

Technology

 

 

15,000

 

 

4-6

Customer relationships

 

 

167,000

 

 

7-11

Trade names

 

 

14,000

 

 

Indefinite

 

 

$

205,000

 

 

 

The above goodwill

Goodwill represents future economic benefits expected to be recognized from the company’sCompany’s expansion into the European wheel market, as well as expected future synergies and operating efficiencies from combining operations with Uniwheels. Acquisitionefficiencies. The purchase price allocation of goodwill, which was finalized in the second quarter of $304.8 million (initial balance2018, yielding an amount of $286.2 million, increased for post-acquisition translation adjustments) has beenwas allocated to the Europe segment. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $99.5 million, as well as an indefinite-lived intangible impairment charge of $2.7 million, relating to our European segment.reporting unit (refer to Note 10, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”).

The following unaudited combined pro forma information is for informational purposes only. The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what the combined company’sCompany’s results actually would have been had the Acquisitionacquisition been completed as of the beginning of the periods as indicated. In addition, the unaudited pro forma information does not purport to project the future results of the combined company.Company.

 

   Twelve Months Ended 
   December 31,
2017
   December 31,
2016
 
   Proforma   Proforma 
(Dollars in thousands)        

Net sales as reported

  $1,108,055   $732,677 

Uniwheels sales, prior to the Acquisition

   243,744    513,571 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Proforma combined sales

  $1,351,799   $1,246,248 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income as reported

  $(6,009  $41,381 

Uniwheels net income before income taxes, prior to the Acquisition

   25,394    55,883 

Incremental interest expense on the debt

   (17,716   (42,518

Incremental amortization on the identifiable intangible assets

   (9,769   (23,446

Transaction expenses incurred by both the company and Uniwheels

   35,906    —   

Income tax expense related to the proforma adjustments

   (10,114   7,509 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Proforma net income

  $17,692   $38,809 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Proforma basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share (1)

  $(0.55  $0.28 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Twelve Months Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

2017

 

 

 

Proforma

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Proforma combined sales

 

$

1,351,799

 

Proforma net income

 

$

17,692

 

 

(1)Earnings attributable to Superior common stockholders used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share has been reduced by estimated annual preferred stock dividends (including accretion of the preferred stock redemption premium which has been treated as a deemed dividend). Refer to Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Earnings per Share” for further information.

NOTE 3 - RESTRUCTURINGREVENUE

During 2014, we completed a reviewIn accordance with ASC 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” the Company disaggregates revenue from contracts with customers into our segments, North America and Europe. Revenues by segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 are summarized in Note 6, “Business Segments”.

The opening and closing balances of initiatives to reduce coststhe Company’s receivables and enhance our competitive position. Based on this review, we committed to a plan to close operations at our Rogers, Arkansas facility, which was completed during the fourth quarter of 2014. current and long-term contract liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

2019

 

 

December 31,

2018

 

 

Change

 

Customer receivables

 

$

68,283

 

 

$

97,566

 

 

$

(29,283

)

Contract liabilities—current

 

 

5,880

 

 

 

5,810

 

 

 

70

 

Contract liabilities—noncurrent

 

 

13,577

 

 

 

8,354

 

 

 

5,223

 

48


The action was undertaken in order to reduce costs and enhance our global competitive position. During 2016, we sold the Rogers facility for total proceeds of $4.3 million, resulting in a $1.4 million gain on sale, which is recorded as a reduction to selling, general and administrative expensechanges in the consolidated income statements.

The total cost incurred as acontract liability balances primarily result offrom timing differences between our performance and customer payment while the Rogers facility closure was $16.0 million, of which $0.1 million, $1.5 million, $6.0 million and $8.4 million was recognized as of December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The following table summarizesdecline in customer receivables is primarily due to the Rogers, Arkansas plant closure costs and classificationdecline in the consolidated income statement forsales. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 20152019 and 2014:

(Dollars in thousands)  Costs
Incurred

Through
December 31,

2016
  Costs in
the Year
Ended
December 31,
2017
   Total
Costs
  Classification

Accelerated and other depreciation of assets idled (1)

  $7,254  $13   $7,267  Cost of sales,
Restructuring costs

Severance costs(2)

      Cost of sales,
   2,011   —      2,011  Restructuring costs

Equipment removal and impairment, inventory written-down, lease termination and other costs (3)

   6,634   125    6,759  Cost of sales,
Restructuring costs
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total restructuring costs

   15,899   138    16,037  

Gain on sale of the facility

   (1,436  —      (1,436 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total

  $14,463  $138   $14,601  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

(1)Cost of sales includes accelerated depreciation due to shorter useful lives for assets to be retired after operations ceased at the Rogers facility.

(2)The closure resulted in a reduction of workforce of approximately 500 employees and a shift in production to other facilities.

(3)We incurred other associated costs such as moving costs, impairment of assets and other closing costs. In 2016, the majority of the costs related to closing, maintenance and other costs. In 2015, we determined that some of the assets would not ultimately be transferred to other facilities and recorded a $2.7 million impairment. In 2014, the majority of the restructuring costs related to inventory write-downs, moving costs and other costs.

Changes2018, the Company recognized tooling reimbursement revenue of $10.7 million and $8.5 million, respectively, which had been deferred in prior periods and was previously included in the accrued expenses related to restructuring liabilities duringcurrent portion of the yearscontract liability (deferred revenue). During the year ended December 31, 20172019 and 2016 were less than $0.1 million.2018, the Company recognized revenue of $1.7 million and $2.8 million, respectively, from obligations satisfied in prior periods as a result of adjustments to pricing estimates for production efficiencies and other revenue adjustments.

NOTE 4 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The companyCompany applies fair value accounting for all financial assets and liabilities andnon-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, while other assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as when we have an asset impairment. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Inputs that are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, investments in certificates of deposit, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values due to the short period of time until maturity.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Included in cash and cash equivalents are highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash, and which are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value due to interest rate, quoted price or penalty on withdrawal. A debt security is classified as a cash equivalent if it meets these criteria and if it has a remaining time to maturity of three months or less from the date of acquisition. Amounts on deposit and available upon demand, or negotiated to provide for daily liquidity without penalty, are classified as cash and cash equivalents. Time deposits, certificates of deposit and money market accounts that meet the above criteria are reported at par value on our balance sheet and are excluded from the table below.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Our derivatives areover-the-counter customized derivative transactions and are not exchange traded. We estimate the fair value of these instruments using industry-standard valuation models such as a discounted cash flow. These models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based expectations for interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices and the contractual terms of the derivative instruments. The discount rate used is the relevant interbank deposit rate (e.g., LIBOR) plus an adjustment fornon-performance risk. In certain cases, market data may not be available and we may use broker quotes and models (e.g., Black-Scholes) to determine fair value. This includes situations where there is lack of liquidity for a particular currency or commodity or when the instrument is longer dated. The fair value measurements of the redeemable preferred sharesstock embedded derivativesderivative are based upon Level 3 unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the liability – refer to “Note 5, Derivative Financial Instruments.”

Cash Surrender Value

TheWe have an unfunded salary continuation plan, which was closed to new participants effective February 3, 2011. We purchased life insurance policies on certain participants to provide, in part, for future liabilities. In the second quarter of 2019, we terminated our life insurance policies in exchange for the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies is the sum of money the insurance company will pay to the company in the event the policy is voluntarily terminated before its maturity or the insured event occurs. Over the term of the life insurance contracts, the cash surrender value changes as a result of premium payments and investment income offset by investment losses, charges and miscellaneous fees. The amount of the asset recorded$7.6 million. We also received $0.6 million for the investment in the life insurance contracts is equal to the cash surrender value which is the amount that will be realized under the contract as of the balance sheet date if the insured event occurs.death benefit claims.  

The following tables categorize items measured at fair value at December 31, 20172019 and 2016:2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurement at Reporting Date Using

 

      Fair Value Measurement at Reporting Date Using 

December 31, 2017

      Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

in Active

Markets for

Identical

Assets (Level 1)

 

 

Significant

Other Observable

Inputs (Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

(Dollars in thousands)                

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit

  $750    —      750    —   

Cash surrender value

   8,040    —      8,040    —   

Derivative contracts

   6,342    —      6,342    —   

 

$

21,973

 

 

$

 

 

$

21,973

 

 

$

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   15,132    —      15,132    —   

 

 

21,973

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,973

 

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Liabilities

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative contracts

   16,106    —      16,106    —   

 

 

8,709

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,709

 

 

 

 

Embedded derivative liability

   4,685    —      —      4,685 

 

 

3,916

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,916

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $20,791    —      16,106    4,685 

 

$

12,625

 

 

$

 

 

$

8,709

 

 

$

3,916

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurement at Reporting Date Using

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

in Active

Markets for

Identical

Assets (Level 1)

 

 

Significant

Other Observable

Inputs (Level 2)

 

 

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit

 

$

750

 

 

$

 

 

$

750

 

 

$

 

Cash surrender value

 

 

8,057

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,057

 

 

 

 

Derivative contracts

 

 

4,218

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,218

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

13,025

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,025

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative contracts

 

 

8,836

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,836

 

 

 

 

 

Embedded derivative liability

 

 

3,134

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,134

 

Total

 

$

11,970

 

 

$

 

 

$

8,836

 

 

$

3,134

 

 

       Fair Value Measurement at Reporting Date Using 

December 31, 2016

      Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
   Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
(Dollars in thousands)                

Assets

        

Certificates of deposit

  $750   $—     $750   $—   

Cash surrender value

   7,480    —      7,480    —   

Derivative contracts

   13    —      13    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   8,243    —      8,243    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities

        

Derivative contracts

   24,773    —      24,773    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $24,773   $—     $24,773   $—   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the changes during 2019, 2018 and 2017 in level 3 fair value measurement of the embedded derivative liability relating to the redeemable preferred sharesstock issued May 22, 2017 in connection with the acquisition of Uniwheels:our European operations:

 

Year Ended December 31,

  2017 
(Dollars in thousands)    

Change in fair value:

  

Beginning fair value at date of issuance on May 22, 2017

  $10,849 

Change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative liability

   (6,164
  

 

 

 

Ending fair value at December 31, 2017

  $4,685 
  

 

 

 

January 1, 2017 – December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Beginning fair value – January 1, 2017

 

$

 

Change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock

   embedded derivative liability

 

 

4,685

 

Ending fair value – December 31, 2017

 

 

4,685

 

Change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock

   embedded derivative liability

 

 

(3,480

)

Effect of redeemable preferred stock modification

 

 

1,929

 

Ending fair value – December 31, 2018

 

 

3,134

 

Change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock

   embedded derivative liability

 

 

782

 

Ending fair value – December 31, 2019

 

$

3,916

 

Debt Instruments

The carrying values of the company’sCompany’s debt instruments vary from their fair values. The fair values were determined by reference to transacted prices of these securities (Level 2 input based on the GAAP fair value

hierarchy)2). The estimated fair value, as well as the carrying value, of the company’sCompany’s debt instruments are shown below (in thousands):

 

  December 31,
2017
 

 

December 31,

2019

 

 

December 31,

2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated aggregate fair value

  $704,005 

 

$

606,093

 

 

$

624,943

 

Aggregate carrying value(1)

   707,864 

 

 

630,635

 

 

 

684,922

 

(1)Long-term debt excluding the impact of unamortized debt issuance costs.

(1)

Long-term debt excluding the impact of unamortized debt issuance costs.

NOTE 5 - DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We use derivatives to partially offset our business exposure to foreign currency, interest rates, aluminum and other commodity risk. We may enter into forward contracts, option contracts, swaps, collars or other derivative instruments to offset some of the risk on expected future cash flows and on certain existing assets and liabilities. However, we may choose not to hedge certain exposures for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, accounting considerations and the prohibitive economic cost of hedging particular exposures. During 2017, the Company entered into a Euro cross currency swap to effectively convert Uniwheels Euro denominated earnings into dollars for use in repaying the debt issued to finance the acquisition.

50


There can be no assurance the hedges will offset more than a portion of the financial impact resulting from movements in foreign currency exchange rates.rates, interest rates, and aluminum and natural gas commodity prices.

To help protect gross margins from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, certain of our subsidiaries, whose functional currency is the U.S. dollar or the Euro, hedge a portion of their forecasted foreign currency costs. Generally, wecosts denominated in the Mexican Peso and Polish Zloty, respectively. We may hedge portions of our forecasted foreign currency exposure associated with costs, typically for up to 48 months.

We record all derivatives in the consolidated balance sheetsheets at fair value. Our accounting treatment for these instruments dependsis based on whether the hedges have been designated for hedge accounting treatment. For hedges subject to hedge accounting treatment, the effective portions ofdesignation. The cash flow hedges that are designated as hedging instruments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income or lossAccumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income (“AOCI”) until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portions of cash flow hedges are recordedearnings, at which point accumulated gains or losses will be recognized in cost of sales.earnings and classified with the underlying hedged transaction. Derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments are adjusted to fair value through earnings in the financial statement line item to which the derivative relates. At December 31, 2017, theThe Company heldhas derivatives that wereare designated for hedge accounting treatmentas hedging instruments as well as derivatives that did not qualify or had not been designated for hedge accounting treatment. All derivatives were designateddesignation as hedging instruments at December 31, 2016.instruments.

Deferred gains and losses associated with cash flow hedges of foreign currency costs are recognized as a component of cost of sales in the same period as the related cost is recognized. Our foreign currency transactions hedged with cash flow hedges as of December 31, 2017, are expected to occur within 1 month to 48 months.

Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges must bede-designated as hedges when it is probable the forecasted hedged transaction will not occur in the initially identified time period or within a subsequenttwo-month time period. Deferred gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss associated with such derivative instruments are reclassified immediately into other expense. Any subsequent changes in fair value of such derivative instruments are reflected in other expense unless they arere-designated as hedges of other transactions.

Redeemable Preferred Stock Embedded Derivative

We have determined that the conversion option embedded in the Series Aour redeemable preferred stock is required to be accounted for separately from the Series A redeemable preferred stock as a derivative liability. Separation

of the conversion option as a derivative liability is required because its economic characteristics are considered more akin to an equity instrument and therefore the conversion option is not considered to be clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the redeemable preferred stock. This is because theThe economic characteristics of the redeemable preferred stock are considered more akin to a debt instrument due to the fact that the shares are redeemable at the holder’s option, the redemption value is significantly greater than the face amount, the shares carry a fixed mandatory dividend and the stock price necessary to make conversion more attractive than redemption is $56.324 and($56.324) is significantly greater than the company’s stock price at the date of issuance of $19.05,($19.05), all of which lead to the conclusion that redemption is more likely than conversion. For additional information on the redeemable preferred stock, see Note 13, “Redeemable Preferred Shares”.

We also have also determined that the embedded early redemption option upon the occurrence of a redemption event (e.g. change of control) must also be bifurcated and accounted for separately from the redeemable preferred stock, at fair value, because the debt host contract involves a substantial discount (face of $150.0 million as compared to the redemption value of $300$300.0 million) and exercise of the early redemption option would accelerate the holder’s option to redeem the shares.shares (refer to Note 12, “Redeemable Preferred Stock”).

Accordingly, we have recorded an embedded derivative liability representing the combined fair value of the right of holders to receive common stock upon conversion of Series A redeemable preferred stock at any time (the “conversion option”) and the right of the holders to exercise their early redemption option upon the occurrence of a redemption event (the “early redemption option”). The embedded derivative liability is adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end with changes in fair value recorded in changethe “Change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative liability inderivative” financial statement line item of the company’sCompany’s consolidated income statements of operations (refer to Note 13, “Redeemable Preferred Shares”4, “Fair Value Measurements”).

A binomial option pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of the conversion and early redemption options embedded in the redeemable preferred stock. The binomial model utilizes a “decision tree” whereby future movement in the company’sCompany’s common stock price is estimated based on a volatility factor. The binomial optionsoption pricing model requires the development and use of assumptions. These assumptions include estimated volatility of the value of our common stock, assumed possible conversion or early redemption dates, an appropriate risk-free interest rate, risky bond rate and dividend yield.

The expected volatility of the company’s equityCompany’s common stock is estimated based on the historical volatility of our common stock.volatility. The assumed base case term used in the valuation model is the period remaining until May 22, 2024September 14, 2025 (the earliest date at which the holder may exercise its unconditional redemption option). A number of other scenarios incorporatedincorporate earlier redemption dates to address the possibility of early redemption upon the occurrence of a redemption event. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield on the U.S. Treasury zero coupon yield curve with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the conversion and early redemption options. The significant assumptions utilized in the company’sCompany’s valuation of the embedded derivativesderivative at December 31, 20172019 are as follows: valuation scenario terms between 4.02.00 and 6.395.71 years, volatility of 32.064 percent, risk-free rate of 2.11.6 percent to 2.31.7 percent related to the respective assumed terms, a risky bond rate of 19.219.5 percent and ano dividend yield of 2.4 percent.yield.

Based on the foregoing assumptions, the fair value of the redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative liability at December 31, 2017 is $4.7 million and the change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative liability during the year was $6.2 million mainly due to the decline in our stock price from $19.05 (at date of issuance) to $14.85 (at December 31, 2017) and the reduction in the remaining term of the options used in the valuation scenarios due to the months elapsed since issuance.51


The following tables display the fair value of derivatives by balance sheet line item at December 31, 20172019 and December 31, 2016:2018:

 

   December 31, 2017 
   Other
Current
Assets
   Other
Non-current
Assets
   Accrued
Liabilities
   Other
Non-current
Liabilities
 
(Dollars in thousands)                

Foreign exchange forward contracts and collars designated as hedging instruments

  $3,065    723    4,922    8,405 

Foreign exchange forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments

   721    —      206    —   

Aluminum forward contracts not designated as hedges

   1,833    —      —      —   

Cross currency swap not designated as hedging instrument

   —      —      1,467    1,106 

Embedded derivative liability

   —      —      —      4,685 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total derivative financial instruments

  $5,619    723    6,595    14,196 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Other

Current

Assets

 

 

Other

Non-current

Assets

 

 

Accrued

Liabilities

 

 

Other

Non-current

Liabilities

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange forward contracts designated as

   hedging instruments

 

$

7,808

 

 

$

12,821

 

 

$

60

 

 

$

100

 

Foreign exchange forward contracts not

   designated as hedging instruments

 

 

1,196

 

 

 

 

 

 

554

 

 

 

 

Aluminum forward contracts designated as

   hedging instruments

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

 

Natural gas forward contracts designated as

   hedging instruments

 

 

81

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

1,312

 

 

 

727

 

Interest rate swap contracts designated as hedging

   instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,304

 

 

 

3,525

 

Embedded derivative liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,916

 

Total derivative financial instruments

 

$

9,145

 

 

$

12,828

 

 

$

4,357

 

 

$

8,268

 

 

  December 31, 2016 

 

December 31, 2018

 

  Other
Current
Assets
   Other
Non-current
Assets
   Accrued
Liabilities
   Other
Non-current
Liabilities
 

 

Other

Current

Assets

 

 

Other

Non-current

Assets

 

 

Accrued

Liabilities

 

 

Other

Non-current

Liabilities

 

(Dollars in thousands)                

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange forward contracts and collars designated as hedging instruments

  $13   $—     $10,076   $14,697 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Foreign exchange forward contracts designated as

hedging instruments

 

$

2,599

 

 

$

1,011

 

 

$

659

 

 

$

6,202

 

Foreign exchange forward contracts not

designated as hedging instruments

 

 

333

 

 

 

 

 

 

207

 

 

 

 

Aluminum forward contracts designated as

hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

927

 

 

 

 

Cross currency swap not designated as hedging

instrument

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

227

 

 

 

 

Natural gas forward contracts designated as

hedging instruments

 

 

275

 

 

 

 

 

 

355

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap contracts designated as hedging

instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

131

 

 

 

128

 

Embedded derivative liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,134

 

Total derivative financial instruments

  $13   $—     $10,076   $14,697 

 

$

3,207

 

 

$

1,011

 

 

$

2,506

 

 

$

9,464

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following table summarizes the notional amount and estimated fair value of our derivative financial instruments:

 

   December 31, 2017   December 31, 2016 
   Notional
U.S. Dollar
Amount
   Fair
Value
   Notional
U.S. Dollar
Amount
   Fair
Value
 
(Dollars in thousands)                

Foreign currency forward contracts and collars designated as hedging instruments

  $397,744   $(9,539  $160,461   $24,760 

Foreign exchange forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments

   23,305    515    —      —   

Aluminum forward contracts not designated as hedges

   15,564    1,833    —      —   

Cross currency swap not designated as hedging instrument

   36,454    (2,573   —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total derivative financial instruments

  $473,067   $(9,764  $160,461   $24,760 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

Notional

U.S. Dollar

Amount

 

 

Fair

Value

 

 

Notional

U.S. Dollar

Amount

 

 

Fair

Value

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts and collars

   designated as hedging instruments

 

$

449,181

 

 

$

20,469

 

 

$

467,253

 

 

$

(3,251

)

Foreign exchange forward contracts not designated

   as hedging instruments

 

 

73,491

 

 

 

642

 

 

 

45,905

 

 

 

126

 

Aluminum forward contracts designated as

   hedging instruments

 

 

9,405

 

 

 

(67

)

 

 

10,810

 

 

 

(927

)

Cross currency swap not designated as hedging

   instrument

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,151

 

 

 

(227

)

Natural gas forward contracts designated as hedging

   instruments

 

 

5,816

 

 

 

(1,951

)

 

 

2,165

 

 

 

(80

)

Interest rate swap contracts designated as hedging

   instruments

 

 

260,000

 

 

 

(5,829

)

 

 

90,000

 

 

 

(259

)

Total derivative financial instruments

 

$

797,893

 

 

$

13,264

 

 

$

628,284

 

 

$

(4,618

)

52


Notional amounts are presented on a grossnet basis. The notional amounts of the derivative financial instruments do not represent amounts exchanged by the parties and, therefore, are not a direct measure of our exposure to the financial risks described above. The amounts exchanged are calculated by reference to the notional amounts and by other terms of the derivatives, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates or commodity volumes and prices.

The following table providestables summarize the impactgain or loss recognized in AOCI as of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on our consolidated income statement:December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the amounts reclassified from AOCI into earnings and the amounts recognized directly into earnings for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

 

Year ended December 31, 2017

  Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in AOCI on
Derivatives (Effective
Portion)
   Amount of Pre-tax Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified from
AOCI into Income (Effective
Portion)
 Amount of Pre-tax Gain or
(Loss) Recognized in Income
on Derivatives (Ineffective
Portion and Amount Excluded
from Effectiveness Testing)
 

Year ended December 31, 2019

 

Amount of Gain or (Loss)

Recognized in AOCI on

Derivatives

 

 

Amount of Pre-tax Gain or

(Loss) Reclassified from

AOCI into Income

 

 

Amount of Pre-tax Gain or

(Loss) Recognized in

Income on Derivatives

 

(Dollars in thousands)          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts and collars

  $7,603   $(4,539 $(538
  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Derivative Contracts

 

$

13,156

 

 

$

3,746

 

 

$

4,320

 

Total

  $7,603   $(4,539 $(538

 

$

13,156

 

 

$

3,746

 

 

$

4,320

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2016

  Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in AOCI on
Derivatives (Effective
Portion)
 Amount of Pre-tax Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified from
AOCI into Income (Effective
Portion)
 Amount of Pre-tax Gain or
(Loss) Recognized in Income
on Derivatives (Ineffective
Portion and Amount Excluded
from Effectiveness Testing)
 

Year ended December 31, 2018

 

Amount of Gain or (Loss)

Recognized in AOCI on

Derivatives

 

 

Amount of Pre-tax Gain or

(Loss) Reclassified from

AOCI into Income

 

 

Amount of Pre-tax Gain or

(Loss) Recognized in

Income on Derivatives

 

(Dollars in thousands)        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts and collars

  $(6,812 $(13,597 $(156
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Derivative Contracts

 

$

5,293

 

 

$

728

 

 

$

(406

)

Total

  $(6,812 $(13,597 $(156

 

$

5,293

 

 

$

728

 

 

$

(406

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2015

  Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in AOCI on
Derivatives (Effective
Portion)
 Amount of Pre-tax Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified from
AOCI into Income (Effective
Portion)
 Amount of Pre-tax Gain or
(Loss) Recognized in Income
on Derivatives (Ineffective
Portion and Amount Excluded
from Effectiveness Testing)
 

Year ended December 31, 2017

 

Amount of Gain or (Loss)

Recognized in AOCI on

Derivatives (Effective

Portion)

 

 

Amount of Pre-tax Gain or

(Loss) Reclassified from

AOCI into Income

(Effective Portion)

 

 

Amount of Pre-tax Gain or

(Loss) Recognized in

Income on Derivatives

(Ineffective Portion and

Amount Excluded from

Effectiveness Testing)

 

(Dollars in thousands)        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts and collars

  $(4,524 $(9,960 $19 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Derivative Contracts

 

$

7,603

 

 

$

(4,539

)

 

$

(538

)

Total

  $(4,524 $(9,960 $19 

 

$

7,603

 

 

$

(4,539

)

 

$

(538

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NOTE 6 - BUSINESS SEGMENTS

As a result of the Acquisition, the company expanded into the European market and extended its customer base to include the principal European OEMs. As a consequence, we have realigned our executive management structure, organization and operations to focus on our performance in our North American and European regions. In accordance with the requirements of ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting,” we have concluded that our North American and European businesses represent separate operating segments in view of significantly different markets, customers and products within each of these regions. Each operating segment has discrete financial information which is evaluated regularly by the company’sCompany’s CEO in determining resource allocation and assessing performance. Within each of these regions, markets, customers, products and production processes are similar and production can be readily transferred between production facilities. Moreover, our business within each region leverages common systems, processes and infrastructure. Accordingly, North America and Europe comprise the company’sCompany’s reportable segments for purposes of segment reporting.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Net Sales

 

 

Income from Operations

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

(Dollars in thousands)  Net Sales   Income from Operations 
2017   2016   2015   2017   2016   2015 

North America

  $732,418   $732,677   $727,946   $9,808   $54,602   $36,294 

 

$

704,320

 

 

$

800,383

 

 

$

732,418

 

 

$

16,713

 

 

$

29,702

 

 

$

9,808

 

Europe

   375,637    —      —      11,710    —      —   

 

 

668,167

 

 

 

701,444

 

 

 

375,637

 

 

 

(66,772

)

 

 

56,103

 

 

 

11,710

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

$

1,372,487

 

 

$

1,501,827

 

 

$

1,108,055

 

 

$

(50,059

)

 

$

85,805

 

 

$

21,518

 

  $1,108,055   $732,677   $727,946   $21,518   $54,602   $36,294 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Depreciation and

Amortization

 

 

Capital Expenditures

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

(Dollars in thousands)  Depreciation and
Amortization
   Capital Expenditures 
2017   2016   2015   2017   2016   2015 

North America

  $35,931   $34,261   $34,530   $47,493   $39,575   $39,543 

 

$

38,845

 

 

$

33,588

 

 

$

35,931

 

 

$

22,464

 

 

$

37,476

 

 

$

47,493

 

Europe

   33,404    —      —      23,444    —      —   

 

 

61,877

 

 

 

61,468

 

 

 

33,404

 

 

 

41,830

 

 

 

40,221

 

 

 

23,444

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

$

100,722

 

 

$

95,056

 

 

$

69,335

 

 

$

64,294

 

 

$

77,697

 

 

$

70,937

 

  $69,335   $34,261   $34,530   $70,937   $39,575   $39,543 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, Plant, and

Equipment, net

 

 

Goodwill and

Intangible Assets

 

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

North America

 

$

237,372

 

 

$

249,791

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

Europe

 

 

291,910

 

 

 

282,976

 

 

 

321,910

 

 

 

459,803

 

 

 

$

529,282

 

 

$

532,767

 

 

$

321,910

 

 

$

459,803

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)                

 

Total Assets

 

  Property, plant, and
equipment, net
   Long-lived
intangible assets
 
  2017   2016   2017   2016 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

North America

  $245,178   $227,403   $—     $—   

 

$

484,689

 

 

$

484,682

 

Europe

   291,508    —      203,473    —   

 

 

827,178

 

 

 

966,934

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

$

1,311,867

 

 

$

1,451,616

 

  $536,686   $227,403   $203,473   $—   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)  Total Assets 
  2017   2016 

North America

  $519,192   $542,756 

Europe

   1,032,060    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $1,551,252   $542,756 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Geographic information

Net sales by geographic location is the following:location:

 

Year Ended December 31,

  2017   2016   2015 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

(Dollars in thousands)            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

  $124,711   $120,395   $177,198 

 

$

104,476

 

 

$

127,178

 

 

$

124,711

 

Mexico

   607,707    612,282    550,748 

 

 

599,844

 

 

 

673,205

 

 

 

607,707

 

Germany

   155,227    —      —   

 

 

245,805

 

 

 

279,631

 

 

 

155,227

 

Poland

   220,410    —      —   

 

 

422,362

 

 

 

421,813

 

 

 

220,410

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Consolidated net sales

  $1,108,055   $732,677   $727,946 

 

$

1,372,487

 

 

$

1,501,827

 

 

$

1,108,055

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

NOTE 7 - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

 

December 31,

  2017   2016 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade receivables

  $152,476   $91,213 

 

$

71,150

 

 

$

101,864

 

Other receivables

   10,016    9,037 

 

 

8,503

 

 

 

7,083

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

79,653

 

 

 

108,947

 

   162,492    100,250 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   (2,325   (919

 

 

(2,867

)

 

 

(4,298

)

  

 

   

 

 

Accounts receivable, net

  $160,167   $99,331 

 

$

76,786

 

 

$

104,649

 

  

 

   

 

 

The following percentages of our consolidated net sales were made to Ford, GM and Toyota: 2017 - 22 percent, 20 percent and 9 percent, respectively; 2016 - 38 percent, 30 percent and 14 percent, respectively; and 2015 - 44 percent, 24 percent and 14 percent, respectively.

 

 

2019 Percent

of Net Sales

 

 

2018 Percent

of Net Sales

 

 

2017 Percent

of Net Sales

 

GM

 

 

22

%

 

 

18

%

 

 

20

%

Ford

 

 

15

%

 

 

18

%

 

 

22

%

VW Group

 

 

13

%

 

 

12

%

 

 

9

%

The accounts receivable from GM, Ford and Toyota at December 31, 2017VW Group represented approximately 2632 percent, 208 and 9 percent and 4 percent, respectively of the total accounts receivable. The accounts receivable, from GM, Ford and Toyotarespectively, at December 31, 2016, represented approximately 392019 and 24 percent, 3211 percent, and 148 percent respectively of the total accounts receivable.receivable, respectively, at December 31, 2018.

NOTE 8 - INVENTORIES

 

December 31,

  2017   2016 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raw materials

  $59,353   $40,255 

 

$

44,245

 

 

$

49,571

 

Work in process

   48,803    21,447 

 

 

40,344

 

 

 

42,886

 

Finished goods

   65,843    21,135 

 

 

83,881

 

 

 

83,121

 

  

 

   

 

 

Inventories

  $173,999   $82,837 
  

 

   

 

 

Inventories, net

 

$

168,470

 

 

$

175,578

 

54


Service wheel and supplies inventory included in othernon-current assets in the consolidated balance sheets totaled $8.1$10.6 million and $6.5$8.9 million at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.   Included in raw materials were operating supplies and spare parts totaling $12.5 million and $10.3 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

NOTE 9 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

 

December 31,

  2017   2016 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land and buildings

  $136,918   $67,915 

 

$

158,907

 

 

$

140,471

 

Machinery and equipment

   720,175    485,185 

 

 

856,961

 

 

 

769,451

 

Leasehold improvements and others

   12,192    4,868 

 

 

12,173

 

 

 

12,883

 

Construction in progress

   58,753    26,301 

 

 

30,179

 

 

 

67,559

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

1,058,220

 

 

 

990,364

 

   928,038    584,269 

Accumulated depreciation

   (391,352   (356,866

 

 

(528,938

)

 

 

(457,597

)

  

 

   

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

  $536,686   $227,403 

 

$

529,282

 

 

$

532,767

 

  

 

   

 

 

Depreciation expense was $54.2$75.8 million, $34.3$68.8 million and $34.5$54.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

NOTE 10 - INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE

On June 28, 2010, we executed a share subscription agreement (the “Agreement”) with Synergies, a private aluminum wheel manufacturer based in Visakhapatnam, India, providing for our acquisition of a minority interest in Synergies. The total cash investment in Synergies amounted to $4.5 million, representing 12.6 percent of the outstanding equity shares of Synergies. Our Synergies investment is accounted for using the cost method. During 2011, a group of existing equity holders, including the company, made a loan of $1.5 million to Synergies for working capital needs. The company’s share of this unsecured advance was $0.5 million. The remaining principal balance of the unsecured advance was paid in full during the first quarter of 2015.

In October 2014, a typhoon caused significant damage to the facilities and operations of Synergies, and in the fourth quarter of 2014, we tested the $4.5 million carrying value of our investment for impairment. Based on our evaluation, we determined there was an other-than-temporary impairment and wrote the investment down to its estimated fair value of $2.0 million, with the $2.5 million loss recognized in income Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2014. The valuation was based on an income approach using current financial forecast data, and rates and assumptions market participants would use in pricing2019 included accelerated depreciation of $7.6 million related to excess equipment arising from the investment. There was no further impairment in 2016 and 2015.

In the third quarter of 2017, the company divested its interest Synergies in exchange for a $2.6 million note receivable realizing a gain of $0.5 million. The note receivable is payable in installments through April 4, 2019. A payment of $0.5 million due October 14, 2017 was received and the remaining balanceplan to reduce production at December 31, 2017 was $2.1 million.our Fayetteville, Arkansas manufacturing facility (refer to Note 23, “Restructuring”).

NOTE 1110 - GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as certain trade names, acquired in connection with the Acquisition on May 30, 2017, are not amortized, but are instead evaluated for impairment on an annual basis,annually at the end of the fiscal year, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that impairment may be more likely. At December 31, 2017, the goodwill balance is $304.8 million, consisting of the initial balance of $286.2 million, increased for post-Acquisition translation adjustments. The carrying amount of goodwill arose from the Acquisition described in Note 2, “Acquisition”.

likely than not. We conducted the annual goodwill impairment testing as of December 31, 2017. In performing2019 using a quantitative approach.  Based on the results of our valuation,quantitative analysis, we recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment charge equal to the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the European reporting unit at December 31, 2019 of $99.5 million. Additionally, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $2.7 million related to our aftermarket trade name indefinite-lived intangible asset which was primarily attributable to the decline in forecasted aftermarket revenues. Total impairment charges of $102.2 million have been recognized as a separate charge and included in income from operations.    

We utilized both an income and a market approach to estimatedetermine the fair value of ourthe European reporting unit due to the fact that Uniwheels stock is still publicly traded. In our market approach, we estimated value based on the market price of Uniwheels shares as of December 31, 2017 of 305 Polish Zloty, as well as the pricepart of our most recent purchase of

Uniwheels shares of 264 Zloty on December 15, 2017. In addition to the market approach, we have used the income approach to further support our analysis.goodwill impairment assessment. The income approach is based on projected debt-free cash flow, which is discounted to the present value using discount factors that consider the timing and risk of cash flows. The discount rate used is the value-weightedweighted average of ouran estimated cost of equity and of debt (“weighted average cost of capital”). OurThe weighted average cost of capital is adjusted as necessary to reflect risk associated with the business of the European reporting unit. Business forecastsFinancial projections are based on estimated production volumes, product prices and expenses, including raw material cost, wages, energy and other expenses. Other significant assumptions include terminal value cash flow and growth rates, future capital expenditures and changes in future working capital requirements. Our assessment indicatedThe market approach is based on the observed ratios of enterprise value to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of comparable, publicly traded companies. The market approach fair value is determined by multiplying historical and anticipated financial metrics of the European reporting unit by the EBITDA pricing multiples derived from comparable, publicly traded companies. A considerable amount of management judgment and assumptions are required in performing the quantitative impairment test, principally related to determining the fair value of the reporting unit.  While the Company believes its judgments and assumptions are reasonable, different assumptions could change the estimated fair value.

At December 31, 2019, we determined that the faircarrying value of the European reporting unit exceeded its respective carryingfair value.

The company’s other intangible assets consistdecline in fair value was due to lower forecasted industry production volumes included in our long-range plan (completed in the fourth quarter of assets2019), as compared to our prior year long-range plan. This was primarily due to softening of the Western and Central European automotive market. Industry forecasts for Western and Central European production volumes in 2020 to 2023 are lower than prior year forecasts by approximately 6.0 percent, with finite livesthe most significant decline in the outlook occurring in the fourth quarter of 2019. Similarly, EBITDA and cash flow for the European reporting unit declined as compared to the prior year long-range plan due to lower forecasted industry production volumes which adversely impacted fair value under both the income and market approaches. In determining the fair value, the Company weighted the income and market approaches, 75 percent and 25 percent, respectively. Significant assumptions used under the income approach included a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 10.0 percent and a trade name with an indefinite life. Theselong-term growth rate of 2.0 percent. In determining the WACC, management considered the level of risk inherent in the cash flow projections and current market conditions. The use of these unobservable inputs results in classification of the fair value estimate as a Level 3 measurement in the fair value hierarchy.

55


The Company’s finite-lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Following is a summary of the company’sCompany’s finite-lived and indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill as of December 31, 2017. There were no such intangible assets at December 31, 2016.2019 and 2018.

 

  Gross
Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
 Currency
Translation
   Net   Remaining
Weighted
Average
Amortization
Period
 
(Dollars in thousands                  

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

Gross

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Impairment

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Currency

Translation

 

 

Net Carrying Amount

 

 

Remaining

Weighted

Average

Amortization

Period

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brand name

  $9,000   $(1,091 $581   $8,490    5-6 

 

$

9,000

 

 

 

—  

 

 

$

(4,778

)

 

$

110

 

 

$

4,332

 

 

3-4

Technology

   15,000    (1,818 968    14,150    4-6 

 

 

15,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,963

)

 

 

183

 

 

 

7,220

 

 

2-4

Customer relationships

   167,000    (12,259 11,005    165,746    6-11 

 

 

167,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

(53,681

)

 

 

954

 

 

 

114,273

 

 

4-9

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

Total finite

   191,000    (15,168 12,554    188,386   

 

 

191,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

(66,422

)

 

 

1,247

 

 

 

125,825

 

 

 

Trade names

   14,000    —    1,087    15,087    Indefinite 

 

 

14,000

 

 

 

(2,733

)

 

 

 

 

 

(14

)

 

 

11,253

 

 

Indefinite

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

Total

  $205,000   $(15,168 $13,641   $203,473   
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

Total intangibles

 

$

205,000

 

 

$

(2,733

)

 

$

(66,422

)

 

$

1,233

 

 

$

137,078

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 

Beginning Balance

 

 

Impairment

 

 

Currency

Translation

 

 

Ending

Balance

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

291,434

 

 

$

(99,505

)

 

$

(7,097

)

 

$

184,832

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

Gross

Carrying

Amount

 

 

Accumulated

Amortization

 

 

Currency

Translation

 

 

Net Carrying Amount

 

 

Remaining

Weighted

Average

Amortization

Period

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brand name

 

$

9,000

 

 

$

(2,979

)

 

$

237

 

 

$

6,258

 

 

4-5

Technology

 

 

15,000

 

 

 

(4,964

)

 

 

394

 

 

 

10,430

 

 

3-5

Customer relationships

 

 

167,000

 

 

 

(33,468

)

 

 

3,823

 

 

 

137,355

 

 

5-10

Total finite

 

 

191,000

 

 

 

(41,411

)

 

 

4,454

 

 

 

154,043

 

 

 

Trade names

 

 

14,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

326

 

 

 

14,326

 

 

Indefinite

Total intangibles

 

$

205,000

 

 

$

(41,411

)

 

$

4,780

 

 

$

168,369

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning Balance

 

 

Impairment

 

 

Currency

Translation

 

 

Ending

Balance

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

304,805

 

 

 

 

 

$

(13,371

)

 

$

291,434

 

Amortization expense for these intangible assets was $25.0 million, $26.3 million and $15.2 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2017.2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The anticipated annual amortization expense for these intangible assets is $25.0$24.5 million for 20182020 to 2021, and $22.2$21.7 million for 2022.2022, $19.8 million for 2023 and 2024.

Note 12 – LONG-TERM

56


NOTE 11 - DEBT

A summary of long-term debt and the related weighted average interest rates is shown below (in thousands):below:

 

  December 31, 2017 

 

December 31, 2019

(Dollars in Thousands)

 

Debt Instrument  Total
Debt
   Debt
Issuance
Costs(1)
 Total
Debt, Net
 Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
 

 

Total

Debt

 

 

Debt

Issuance

Costs (1)

 

 

Total

Debt, Net

 

 

Weighted

Average

Interest

Rate

 

Credit Facility - Term Loan

  $386,800   $(15,802 $370,998  5.6

Term Loan Facility

 

$

371,800

 

 

$

(10,192

)

 

$

361,608

 

 

 

5.7

%

6.00% Senior Notes due 2025

   300,250    (8,510 291,740  6.0

 

 

243,074

 

 

 

(5,408

)

 

 

237,666

 

 

 

6.0

%

Other

   20,814    —    20,814  1.0

 

 

12,693

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,693

 

 

 

2.2

%

  

 

   

 

  

 

  
  $707,864   $(24,312 683,552  

Finance Leases

 

 

3,068

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,068

 

 

 

2.9

%

  

 

   

 

   

 

$

630,635

 

 

$

(15,600

)

 

 

615,035

 

 

 

 

 

Less: Current portion

     (4,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4,010

)

 

 

 

 

     

 

  

Long-term debt

     $679,552  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

611,025

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

(Dollars in Thousands)

 

Debt Instrument

 

Total

Debt

 

 

Debt

Issuance

Costs (1)

 

 

Total

Debt, Net

 

 

Weighted

Average

Interest

Rate

 

Term Loan Facility

 

$

382,800

 

 

$

(13,078

)

 

$

369,722

 

 

 

6.3

%

6.00% Senior Notes due 2025

 

 

286,100

 

 

 

(7,366

)

 

 

278,734

 

 

 

6.0

%

Other

 

 

16,022

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,022

 

 

 

2.2

%

 

 

$

684,922

 

 

$

(20,444

)

 

 

664,478

 

 

 

 

 

Less: Current portion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,052

)

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

661,426

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Unamortized portion

Senior Notes

On June 15, 2017, Superior issued €250.0Euro 250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.00% Senior Notes (the “Notes”) due June 15, 2025.2025 (the “Notes”). Interest on the Notes is payable semiannually, on June 15 and December 25.15. Superior may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, on or after June 15, 2020 at redemption prices of 103.000%103.000 percent and 101.500%101.500 percent of the principal amount thereof if the redemption occurs during the12-month period beginning June 15, 2020 or 2021, respectively, and a redemption price of 100.000%100 percent of the principal amount thereof on or after June 15, 2022, in each case plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the applicable redemption date. In addition, the companyCompany may redeem some or all of the Notes prior to June 15, 2020 at a price equal to 100.000%100.0 percent of the principal amount thereof plus a “make-whole” premium and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, up to, but not including, the redemption date. Prior to June 15, 2020, the companyCompany may redeem up to 40.000%40 percent of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes using the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a certain redemption price. If we experience a change of control or sell certain assets, the companyCompany may be required to offer to purchase the Notes from the holders.

The Notes are senior unsecured obligations ranking equally in right of payment with all of the Company’sits existing and future senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to any subordinated indebtedness. The notesNotes are effectively subordinated in right of payment to the existing and future secured indebtedness of the Company, including the Senior Secured Credit Facilities (as defined below), to the extent of the assets securing such indebtedness.

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company opportunistically purchased Notes on the open market with face value of $36.8 million (33.0 million Euro) for $32.3 million. The associated carrying value of the Notes, net of allocable debt issuance costs, was $35.9 million, resulting in a net gain of $3.7 million, which was included in other (expense) income, net.

Guarantee

The Notes are unconditionally guaranteed by all material wholly-owned direct and indirect domestic restricted subsidiaries of the companyCompany (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”), with customary exceptions including, among other things, where providing such guarantees is not permitted by law, regulation or contract or would result in adverse tax consequences.

57


Covenants

Subject to certain exceptions, the indenture governing the Notes contains restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of Superior and the Subsidiary Guarantors to: (i) incur additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred stock; (ii) pay dividends on, or make distributions in respect of, their capital stock; (iii) make certain investments or other restricted payments; (iv) sell certain assets or issue capital stock of restricted subsidiaries; (v) create liens; (vi) merge, consolidate, transfer or dispose of substantially all of their assets; and (vii) engage in certain transactions with affiliates. These covenants are subject to a number ofseveral important limitations and exceptions that are described in the indenture.

The indenture provides for customary events of default that include, among other things (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods): (i) nonpayment of principal, premium, if any, and interest, when due; (ii) breach of covenants in the indenture; (iii) a failure to pay certain judgments; and (iv) certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the TrusteeBank of New York Mellon, London Branch (“the Trustee”) or holders of at least 30 percent in principal amount of the then outstanding Notes may declare the principal, premium, if any, and accrued and unpaid interest on all the Notes to be due and payable. These events of default are subject to a number ofseveral important qualifications, limitations and exceptions that are described in the indenture. As ofAt December 31, 2017,2019, the companyCompany was in compliance with all covenants under the indenturesindenture governing the Notes.

Senior Secured Credit Facilities

On March 22, 2017, Superior entered into a senior secured credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Citibank, N.A, as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Issuing Bank, JP Morgan Chase N.A., Royal Bank of Canada and Deutsche Bank A.G. New York Branch

(collectively, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners, and the other lenders party thereto (collectively, the “Lenders”). The Credit Agreement consistsconsisted of a $400.0 million senior secured term loan facility (the “Term Loan Facility”), which matures on May 23, 2024, and a $160.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility” and,) maturing on May 23, 2022, together with the Term Loan Facility, the “SeniorUSD Senior Secured Credit Facilities”Facilities (“USD SSCF”).

On June 29, 2018, the Company entered into an amendment to the Credit Agreement pursuant to which the interest rate under the Term Loan Facility was reduced to LIBOR plus 4.00 percent (from LIBOR plus 4.50 percent), subject to a LIBOR floor of 0.00 percent (in place of the previous LIBOR floor of 1.00 percent). Substantially all of the original loans under the Term Loan Facility were replaced with loans from existing lenders under terms that were not substantially different than those of the original loans. As a result, this transaction did not result in any debt extinguishment and the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the original loans will continue to be amortized over the remaining term of the replacement loans (which is unchanged from the original term). Borrowings under the Term Loan Facility will bear interest at a rate equal to, at the company’sCompany’s option, either (a) LIBOR for the relevant interest period, adjusted for statutory reserve requirements, subject to a floor of 1.000.00 percent per annum, plus an applicable rate of 4.504.00 percent or (b) a base rate, subject to a floor of 2.00 percent per annum, equal to the highest of (1) the rate of interest in effect as publicly announced by the administrative agent as its prime rate, (2) the federal funds rate plus 0.50 percent and (3) LIBOR for an interest period of one month plus 1.00 percent, in each case, plus an applicable rate of 3.503.00 percent.

Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility initially bear interest at a rate equal to, at the company’sCompany’s option, either (a) LIBOR for the relevant interest period, adjusted for statutory reserve requirements, subject to a floor of 1.00 percent per annum, plus an applicable rate of 3.50 percent or (b) a base rate, subject to a floor of 2.00 percent per annum, equal to the highest of (1) the rate of interest in effect as publicly announced by the administrative agent as its prime rate, (2) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50 percent and (3) LIBOR for an interest period of one month plus 1.00 percent, in each case, plus an applicable rate of 3.502.50 percent provided such rate may not be less than zero. The initial commitment fee for unused commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility shall be 0.50 percent. After September 30, 2017, theThe applicable rates for borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and commitment fees for unused commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility are based upon the First Lien Net Leverage Ratio effective for the preceding quarter with LIBOR applicable rates between 3.50 percent and 3.00 percent, base rate applicable rates between 2.50 percent and 2.00 percent and commitment fees between 0.50 percent and 0.25 percent. Commitment fees are included in our consolidated financial statements line, interest (expense) income,expense, net. During the year ended

As of December 31, 2017,2019, the companyCompany had repaid $13.2$28.2 million under the term loan facilityTerm Loan Facility resulting in a balance of $386.8$371.8 million.

Quarterly principal payments of $1.0 million are due on the term loan, however, as a result of prepayments, there are no quarterly payments due until 2021. Beginning in January 2019, payments may be due on the term loan in an amount equal to a percentage (up to 50 percent) of excess cash flow as defined under the Credit Agreement. In addition, further payments may be due in the event of asset sales equal to net proceeds on such dispositions in excess of $5.0 million individually and $20.0 million in the aggregate in any year.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, the companyCompany had no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, had outstanding letters of credit of $2.8$3.6 million and had available unused commitments under the facilityRevolving Credit Facility of $157.2$156.4 million.

58


Guarantees and Collateral Security

Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed by all material wholly-owned direct and indirect domestic restricted subsidiaries of the company,Company, with customary exceptions including, among other things, where providing such guarantees is not permitted by law, regulation or contract or would result in adverse tax consequences. The guarantees of such obligations, will be secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, by substantially all of our assets and the Subsidiary Guarantors’ assets, including but not limited to: (i) a perfected pledge of all of the capital stock issued by each of the company’sCompany’s direct wholly-owned domestic restricted subsidiaries or any guarantor (subject to certain exceptions) and up to 65 percent of the capital stock issued by each direct wholly-owned foreign restricted subsidiary of the companyCompany or any guarantor (subject to certain exceptions) and (ii) perfected security interests in and mortgages on substantially all tangible and intangible personal property and materialfee-owned real property of the Company and the guarantors (subject to certain exceptions and exclusions).

Covenants

The Senior Secured Credit Facilities containAgreement contains a number of restrictive covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our ability to incur additional indebtedness and guarantee indebtedness, create or incur liens,

engage in mergers or consolidations, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of assets, make investments, acquisitions, loans or advances, pay dividends, distributions or other restricted payments, or repurchase our capital stock, prepay, redeem, or repurchase any subordinated indebtedness, enter into agreements which limit our ability to incur liens on our assets or that restrict the ability of restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other restricted payments to us, and enter into certain transactions with our affiliates.

In addition, the Credit Agreement contains customary default provisions, representations and warranties and restrictiveother covenants. The Credit Agreement also contains a provision permitting the Lenders to accelerate the repayment of all loans outstanding under the Senior Secured Credit FacilitiesUSD SSCF during an event of default. As ofAt December 31, 2017,2019, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Agreement.

UniwheelsEuropean Debt

In connection with the Acquisition,acquisition of UNIWHEELS AG, the Company assumed $70.7 million of outstanding debt. At December 31, 2017, $20.82019, $12.7 million of debt remained outstanding relating to an equipment loan with quarterly principal payments of $0.8 million.which $3.0 million was classified as current.

During the second quarter of 2019, the Company amended its EUR Senior Secured Credit Facility (“EUR SSCF”), our European revolving credit facility, increasing the available borrowing limit from 30.0 million Euro to 45.0 million Euro and extending the term to May 22, 2022. At December 31, 2017, $4.0 million of this debt2019, there was classified as current. Uniwheels also has an undrawn revolving line of credit for 3044.6 million Euro which expires July 31, 2020.of available funds under the EUR SSCF.  The revolving credit facilityEUR SSCF bears interest at Euribor (with a floor of zero) plus 0.95a margin (ranging from 1.55 percent (butto 3.0 percent based on the net debt leverage ratio of Superior Industries Europe AG and its wholly owned subsidiaries, collectively “Superior Europe AG”), currently 1.55 percent. The annual commitment fee for unused commitments (ranging from 0.50 percent to 1.05 percent based on the net debt leverage ratio of Superior Europe AG), is currently 0.50 percent per annum. In addition, a management fee is assessed equal to 0.07 percent of borrowings outstanding at each month end. The commitment and management fees are both included in interest expense, net. Superior Europe AG has pledged substantially all of its assets, including land and buildings, receivables, inventory, and other moveable assets (other than collateral associated with the equipment loan) as collateral under the EUR SSCF. On January 31, 2020, the available borrowing limit of the EUR SSCF was increased from Euro 45.0 million to Euro 60.0 million. All other terms of the EUR SSCF remained unchanged.

The EUR SSCF is subject to a number of restrictive covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of  Superior Europe AG to incur additional indebtedness and guarantee indebtedness, create or incur liens, engage in mergers or consolidations, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of assets, make investments, acquisitions, loans or advances, pay dividends or distributions, or repurchase our capital stock, prepay, redeem, or repurchase any event not less than 0.95 percent)subordinated indebtedness, and enter into agreements which limit our ability to incur liens on our assets. At December 31, 2019, Superior Europe AG was in compliance with all covenants under the EUR SSCF.

During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company entered into equipment loan agreements totaling $13.4 million (12.0 million Euro) which bear interest at 2.3 percent and mature on September 30, 2027. Interest and principal repayments are due quarterly. The funds will be used to finance certain property, plant and equipment at the Company’s Werdohl, Germany plant. The loans are secured with liens on the financed equipment and are subject to restrictive covenants that, among other things, restrict the ability of Superior Europe AG to reduce its ownership interest in Superior Industries Production Germany GmbH, its wholly-owned subsidiary and the borrower under the loan. At December 31, 2019, the Company had not yet drawn down on the loans. On January 15, 2020, the Company withdrew $11.9 million (10.6 million Euro) under the equipment loans, with the remaining available funds expected to be drawn in 2020. Quarterly installment payments of $479 thousand (427.7 thousand Euro) under the loan bears interest at 2.20 percent.agreements will begin in December of 2020. At December 31, 2019, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the loans.

59


NOTE 1312 - REDEEMABLE PREFERRED SHARESSTOCK

On March 22,During 2017, Superiorwe issued 150,000 shares of Series A (140,202 shares) and Series B (9,798 shares) Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share to TPG Growth III Sidewall, L.P. (“TPG”) entered into an Investment Agreement pursuant to which Superior agreed to issue a number of shares of Series A Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A redeemable preferred stock”) and Series B Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series B redeemable preferred stock”), par value $0.01 per share (the “Series A redeemable preferred stock” and “Series B redeemable preferred stock” referred to collectively as the “redeemable preferred stock”) to TPG for an aggregate purchase price of $150.0 million (the “Investment”). As of the closing of the Investment on May 22, 2017, Superior issued 140,202 shares of Series A redeemable preferred stock, which was equal to 19.99 percent of Superior’s common stock outstanding on such date, and 9,798 shares of Series B redeemable preferred stock to TPG.

million. On August 30, 2017, our stockholders approved the conversion of 9,798 shares of Series B redeemable preferred stock into Series A redeemable preferred stock and all outstanding shares of Series B redeemable preferred stock were automatically converted into Series A redeemable preferred stock, (the “Conversion”). Series Athe “redeemable preferred stock” after approval by our shareholders. The redeemable preferred stock has an initial stated value of $1,000 per share, par value of $0.01 per share and liquidation preference over common stock. Series A

The redeemable preferred stock is convertible into shares of Superiorour common stock equal to the number of shares determined by dividing the sum of the stated value and any accrued and unpaid dividends by the conversion price of $28.162. Series AThe redeemable preferred stock accrues dividends at a rate of 9 percent per annum, payable at Superior’sour election eitherin-kind or in cash. Series A redeemable preferred stockcash and is also entitled to participate in dividends on common stock in an amount equal to that which would have been due had the shares been converted into common stock.

We may mandate conversion of the Series A redeemable preferred stock if the price of the common stock exceeds $84.49. TPG may redeem the shares upon the occurrence of any of the following events (referred to as a “redemption event”): a change in control, recapitalization, merger, sale of substantially all of the company’sCompany’s assets, liquidation or delisting of the company’sCompany’s common stock. In addition, as originally issued, TPG may,has the right, at its option, to unconditionally redeem the shares at any time after May 23, 2024. Superior2024, subsequently extended to September 14, 2025 (the “redemption date”). We may, at itsour option, redeem in whole at any time all of the shares of Series A redeemable preferred stock outstanding. If redeemedAt redemption by either party, on or before October 22, 2018, the redemption value (the “redemption value”) would be $262.5 million (1.75 times stated value). If redeemed after October 22, 2018, the redemption value wouldwill be the greater of $300two times the initial face value ($150.0 million) and any accrued unpaid dividends or dividends paid-in-kind, currently $300.0 million, (2.0 times stated value) or the product of the number of common shares into which the Series A redeemable preferred stock could be converted (5.3 million shares currently) and the then current market price of the common stock.

We have determined that the conversion option and the redemption option exercisable upon occurrence of a “redemption event” which are embedded in the redeemable preferred stock is required tomust be accounted for separately from the redeemable preferred stock as a derivative liability. Separation of the conversion option as a derivative liability is required because its economic characteristics are considered(as more akin to an equity instrument and therefore the conversion option is not considered to be clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the redeemable preferred stock. This is because the economic characteristics of the redeemable preferred stock are considered more akin to a debt instrument due to the fact that the shares are redeemable at the holder’s option, the redemption value is significantly greater than the face amount, the shares carry a fixed mandatory dividend, the stock price necessary to make conversion more attractive than redemption ($56.324) is significantly greater than the price at the date of issuance ($19.05), all of which lead to the conclusion that redemption is more likely than conversion.

We have also determined that the early redemption option exercisable upon the occurrence of a redemption event must also be bifurcated and accounted for separately from the redeemable preferred stock at fair value, because the debt host contract involves a substantial discount (face of $150.0 million as compared to the redemption value of $300.0 million) and the exercise of the early redemption option upon the occurrence of a redemption event would accelerate the holder’s option to redeem the shares.

Accordingly, we have recorded an embedded derivative liability representing the estimated combined fair value of the right of holders to receive common stock upon conversion (the “conversion option”) and the right of the holders to exercise their early redemption option upon the occurrence of a redemption event. The embedded derivative liability is adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end with changes in fair value recorded in the “Change in fair value of redeemable preferred stock embedded derivative liability” financial statement line item of the company’s consolidated statements of operations. Refer tofully described under Note 5, “Derivative Financial Instruments” for further information regarding the valuation of the embedded derivative.).

Since the redeemable preferred stock may be redeemed at the option of the holder, but is not mandatorily redeemable, the redeemable preferred stock has been classified as mezzanine equity and initially recognized at fair value of $150.0 million (the proceeds on the date of issuance) less issuance costs of $3.7 million, resulting in an initial value of $146.3 million. This amount had been further reduced by $10.9 million assigned to the embedded derivative liability at date of issuance, resulting in an adjusted initial value of $135.5 million. We are accreting theThe difference between the adjusted initial value of $135.5 million and the redemption value of $300.0$300 million was being accreted over the seven-year period from the date of issuance through May 23, 2024 (the original date at which the holder hashad the unconditional right to redeem the shares, deemed to be the earliest likely redemption date) using the effective interest method. The accretion to the carrying value of the redeemable preferred stock is treated as a deemed dividend, recorded as a charge to retained earnings and deducted in computing earnings per share (analogous to the treatment for stated and participating dividends paid on the redeemable preferred shares). We have accreted $9.2

On November 7, 2018, the Company filed a Certificate of Correction to the Certificate of Designations for the preferred stock, which became effective upon filing and corrected the redemption date to September 14, 2025. This resulted in a modification of the redeemable preferred stock. As a result of the modification, the carrying value of the redeemable preferred stock decreased $17.2 million (which was credited to retained earnings, treated as a deemed dividend and added back to compute earnings per share) and the period for accretion of the carrying value to the redemption value has been extended to September 14, 2025. The accretion has been adjusted to amortize the excess of the redemption value over the carrying value over the period through September 14, 2025. The accumulated accretion net of the modification adjustment as of December 31, 20172019 is $25.5 million resulting in aan adjusted redeemable preferred stock balance of $144.7$161.0 million.

60


NOTE 13 - EUROPEAN NON-CONTROLLING REDEEMABLE EQUITY

On January 17, 2018, the Company entered into a Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer agreement (“DPLTA”) retroactively effective as of January 1, 2018. As a result, non-controlling interests with a carrying value of $51.9 million were reclassified from stockholders’ equity to mezzanine equity as of January 1, 2018 because non-controlling interests with redemption rights (not within the Company’s control) are considered redeemable and must be classified outside shareholders’ equity. In addition, the carrying value of the non-controlling interests must be adjusted to redemption value since the shares are currently redeemable. The following table summarizes the European non-controlling redeemable equity activity for the two year period ended December 31, 2019:

Balance at December 31, 2017

 

$

 

Reclassification of non-controlling interests

 

 

51,943

 

Redemption value adjustment

 

 

3,625

 

Dividends accrued

 

 

1,512

 

Dividends paid

 

 

(964

)

Translation adjustment

 

 

(3,219

)

Purchase of shares

 

 

(39,048

)

Balance at December 31, 2018

 

 

13,849

 

Dividends accrued

 

 

566

 

Dividends paid

 

 

(848

)

Translation adjustment

 

 

(361

)

Purchase of shares

 

 

(6,681

)

Balance at December 31, 2019

 

$

6,525

 

NOTE 14 - EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to Superior, after adjusting for redeemable preferred stock dividend and accretion, European non-controlling redeemable equity dividends and, with respect to 2018, the preferred stock modification (consisting of the preferred stock reduction of $17.2 million, net of the increase in the embedded derivative liability of $1.9 million), by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. For purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share, the weighted average shares outstanding includes the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and time and performance based restricted stock units under the treasury stock method. The redeemable preferred shares discussed in Note 12, “Redeemable Preferred Stock” are not included in the diluted earnings per share because the conversion would be anti-dilutive.

Year Ended December 31,

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic Earnings Per Share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported net income (loss) attributable to Superior

 

$

(96,460

)

 

$

25,961

 

 

$

(6,203

)

Less: Redeemable preferred stock dividends and accretion

 

 

(30,977

)

 

 

(32,462

)

 

 

(18,912

)

Add: Preferred stock modification

 

 

 

 

 

15,257

 

 

 

 

Less: European non-controlling redeemable equity dividend

 

 

(566

)

 

 

(1,512

)

 

 

 

Basic numerator

 

$

(128,003

)

 

$

7,244

 

 

$

(25,115

)

Basic earnings (loss) per share

 

$

(5.10

)

 

$

0.29

 

 

$

(1.01

)

Weighted average shares outstanding-Basic

 

 

25,099

 

 

 

24,994

 

 

 

24,929

 

Diluted Earnings Per Share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported net income (loss) attributable to Superior

 

$

(96,460

)

 

$

25,961

 

 

$

(6,203

)

Less: Redeemable preferred stock dividends and accretion

 

 

(30,977

)

 

 

(32,462

)

 

 

(18,912

)

Add: Preferred stock modification

 

 

 

 

 

15,257

 

 

 

 

Less: European non-controlling redeemable equity dividend

 

 

(566

)

 

 

(1,512

)

 

 

 

Diluted numerator

 

$

(128,003

)

 

$

7,244

 

 

$

(25,115

)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

$

(5.10

)

 

$

0.29

 

 

$

(1.01

)

Weighted average shares outstanding-Basic

 

 

25,099

 

 

 

24,994

 

 

 

24,929

 

Dilutive effect of common share equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

161

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding-Diluted

 

 

25,099

 

 

 

25,155

 

 

 

24,929

 


NOTE 15 - INCOME TAXES

IncomeIncome/(loss) before income taxes from domestic and international jurisdictions is comprised of the following:

 

Year Ended December 31,

  2017   2016   2015 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

(Dollars in thousands)       ��    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes:

      

Income/(loss) before income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

  $(63,716  $18,499   $25,069 

 

$

(60,170

)

 

$

(44,058

)

 

$

(63,716

)

Foreign

   64,582    36,222    10,214 

 

 

(32,867

)

 

 

76,310

 

 

 

64,582

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

$

(93,037

)

 

$

32,252

 

 

$

866

 

  $866   $54,721   $35,283 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

The provisionbenefit/(provision) for income taxes is comprised of the following:

 

Year Ended December 31,

  2017   2016   2015 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

(Dollars in thousands)            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current taxes

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

  $6,121   $(5,017  $(10,900

 

$

3,834

 

 

$

3,714

 

 

$

6,121

 

State

   (390   450    481 

 

 

(146

)

 

 

127

 

 

 

(390

)

Foreign

   (12,564   (10,639   (2,099

 

 

(10,615

)

 

 

(11,180

)

 

 

(12,564

)

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total current taxes

   (6,833   (15,206   (12,518

 

 

(6,927

)

 

 

(7,339

)

 

 

(6,833

)

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Deferred taxes

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

   (4,387   (1,199   (961

 

 

(3,174

)

 

 

(919

)

 

 

(4,387

)

State

   1,492    (332   (576

 

 

1,014

 

 

 

521

 

 

 

1,492

 

Foreign

   2,853    3,397    2,716 

 

 

5,664

 

 

 

1,446

 

 

 

2,853

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deferred taxes

   (42   1,866    1,179 

 

 

3,504

 

 

 

1,048

 

 

 

(42

)

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income tax provision

  $(6,875  $(13,340  $(11,339
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income tax benefit (provision)

 

$

(3,423

)

 

$

(6,291

)

 

$

(6,875

)

The following is a reconciliation of the U.S. federal tax rate to our effective income tax rate:

 

Year Ended December 31,

  2017 2016 2015 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Statutory rate

   (35.0)%  (35.0)%  (35.0)% 

 

 

(21.0

)%

 

 

(21.0

)%

 

 

(35.0

)%

State tax provisions, net of federal income tax benefit

   263.4  (6.3 3.8 

 

 

(2.7

)

 

 

6.4

 

 

 

263.4

 

Tax credits

   88.9  0.6  0.9 

 

 

(6.6

)

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

88.9

 

Foreign income taxes at rates other than the statutory rate

   1,206.6  11.7  2.3 

 

 

(17.7

)

 

 

16.8

 

 

 

1,206.6

 

Valuation allowance and other

   (138.0 5.1  (5.6

 

 

6.9

 

 

 

(28.0

)

 

 

(138.0

)

Changes in tax liabilities, net

   (11.3 0.5  6.4 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

(11.3

)

Share based compensation

   (61.5 (1.2 (4.4

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

(61.5

)

Transaction costs

   (372.2  —     —   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(372.2

)

Tax Reform

   (1,918.7  —     —   

US Tax Reform implementation

 

 

 

 

 

10.9

 

 

 

(1,918.7

)

US tax on non-US income

 

 

6.7

 

 

 

(16.1

)

 

 

 

Non taxable income

   152.6   —     —   

 

 

(2.4

)

 

 

16.3

 

 

 

152.6

 

Impairment of goodwill

 

 

34.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

   31.3  0.2  (0.5

 

 

4.4

 

 

 

(4.5

)

 

 

31.3

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Effective income tax rate

   (793.9)%  (24.4)%  (32.1)% 

 

 

3.7

%

 

 

(19.5

)%

 

 

(793.9

)%

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Our effective income tax rate for 2017 was 793.9 percent. The effective tax rate was higher than the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due tonon-deductible acquisition costs related to the Uniwheels acquisition, and provisional estimates recorded for the transition tax on offshore earnings and a deferred tax expense resulting from the reduction of our deferred tax assets. The reduction in deferred tax assets was due to the change in the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% for years subsequent to 2017 arising from the newly enacted U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Our effective income tax rate for 2016 was 24.4 percent. The effective tax rate was lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily as a result of income in jurisdictions where the statutory rate is lower than the U.S. rate and tax benefits due to the release of tax liabilities related to uncertain tax positions.62

Our effective income tax rate for 2015 was 32.1 percent. The effective tax rate was lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily as a result of net decreases in the liability for uncertain tax positions partially offset by the reversal of deferred tax assets related to share-based compensation shortfalls.


Tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:

 

December 31,

  2017   2016 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income tax assets:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued liabilities

  $2,445   $6,120 

 

$

4,695

 

 

$

8,117

 

Hedging and foreign currency losses

   2,034    9,475 

 

 

2,386

 

 

 

(1,163

)

Deferred compensation

   8,628    11,723 

 

 

8,018

 

 

 

8,021

 

Inventory reserves

   2,954    3,563 

 

 

4,609

 

 

 

3,984

 

Net loss carryforwards and credits

   69,018    3,123 

 

 

38,342

 

 

 

51,552

 

Interest carryforwards

 

 

19,632

 

 

 

11,269

 

Competent authority deferred tax assets and other foreign timing differences

   6,939    5,135 

 

 

3,954

 

 

 

6,749

 

Other

   (830   462 

 

 

782

 

 

 

(3,921

)

  

 

   

 

 

Total before valuation allowance

   91,188    39,601 

 

 

82,418

 

 

 

84,608

 

Valuation allowance

   (7,634   (3,123

 

 

(22,879

)

 

 

(16,576

)

  

 

   

 

 

Net deferred income tax assets

   83,554    36,478 

 

 

59,539

 

 

 

68,032

 

  

 

   

 

 

Deferred income tax liabilities:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangibles, property, plant and equipment and other

   (57,791   (11,268

 

 

(33,301

)

 

 

(44,591

)

  

 

   

 

 

Deferred income tax liabilities

   (57,791   (11,268

 

 

(33,301

)

 

 

(44,591

)

  

 

   

 

 

Net deferred income tax assets

  $25,763   $25,210 

 

$

26,238

 

 

$

23,441

 

  

 

   

 

 

The classification of our net deferred tax asset is shown below:

 

December 31,

  2017   2016 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term deferred income tax assets

  $54,302   $28,838 

 

$

38,607

 

 

$

42,105

 

Long-term deferred income tax liabilities

   (28,539   (3,628

 

 

(12,369

)

 

 

(18,664

)

  

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

  $25,763   $25,210 

 

$

26,238

 

 

$

23,441

 

  

 

   

 

 

Realization of any of our deferred tax assets at December 31, 20172019 is dependent on the companyCompany generating sufficient taxable income in the future. The determination of whether or not to record a full or partial valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets is a critical accounting estimate requiring a significant amount of judgment on the part of management. In determining when to release the valuation allowance established against our deferred income tax assets, we consider all available evidence, both positive and negative. We perform our analysis on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis at the end of each reporting period. The increase in the valuation allowance of $4.5$6.3 million relates to Stateinterest expense carryforwards and state net operating loss carryforwards the companyCompany is not more likely than not to utilize prior to expiration, as well as, German loss carryforwards that are frozen under the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement with UNIWHEELS AG.expiration.

The U.S. Tax CutsCut and Jobs Act (“the Act”) was enacted on December 22, 2017. The Act reducescontains significant changes to corporate taxation, including the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, requires companies to pay aone-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred and creates new taxes on certain foreign sourced earnings. Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, allows filers to use prior year methodologies or estimates of the anticipated current impact of the Act in the preparation of their 2017 financial statements. At December 31, 2017, the Company had not completed its accounting for the tax effects of enactment of the Act; however, in certain cases, as described below, it has made a reasonable estimate of the effects on its existing deferred tax balances and theone-time transition tax. In all cases, the Company will continue to make and refine its calculations as additional data is gathered and further analysis is completed. In addition, the Company’s estimates may also be affected as it gains a more thorough

understanding of the tax law and certain aspects of the Act are clarified by the taxing authorities. Any adjustments to these provisional amounts will be reported as a component of tax expense (benefit) in the reporting period in which any such adjustments are determined, which will be no later than the fourth quarter of 2018.

We recognized the impact of the Act for the year ended December 31, 2017. The impact primarily consists of a $7.3 million related tore-measurement of U.S. deferred tax assets due to the loweringreduction of the corporate tax rate described above and $9.3 million of expense for the estimate of the impact offrom 35 percent to 21 percent, a one-time transition tax on offshore earnings at reduced tax rates regardless of whether earnings are repatriated, the mandatory repatriationelimination of U.S. tax on foreign dividends (subject to certain important exceptions), new tax on U.S. shareholders of certain foreign subsidiaries earnings — Global Intangible Low-Tax Income (“GILTI”), limitations on deductibility of foreign subsidiaries. interest expense, immediate deductions for certain new investments and the modification or repeal of many business deductions and credits.

The Company anticipates additional guidance and clarification regarding the implementationhad recorded a provisional amount of $16.6 million expense for enactment-date income tax effects of the transitionAct at December 31, 2017. Following the guidance in SAB 118, at December 31, 2018, the Company has completed the accounting for all enactment-date income tax will be issued by federaleffects of the Act and state taxing authorities and this estimate is, therefore, subjectrecorded a benefit of $3.9 million as an adjustment to future refinement.the provisional amounts.

As of December 31, 2017,2019, we have cumulative tax effected U.S. state and Germany NOL carryforwards of $87.0$12.2 million that expire in the years 20182020 to 2037.2038. Also, we have $58.0$26.0 million of tax credit carryforwards, primarily in Poland, which expire in the years 2021 to 2026.

Historically, U.S. income63


The transition tax hassubstantially eliminated the basis difference on foreign subsidiaries that existed previously for purposes of accounting standards codification topic 740. However, there are limited other taxes that could continue to apply such as foreign withholding and certain state taxes. Taxes have not been recognizedprovided on the excessbasis differences in investments of $227 million that are deemed indefinitely reinvested. Quantification of the amount for financial reporting over thedeferred tax basis of the Company’s investment in itsnon-U.S. subsidiaries derived from foreign earnings that areliability, if any, associated with indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. At December 31, 2017, unremitted earnings of the $164.3 million have been included in the computation of the transition tax associated with the Act. The Company remains indefinitely reinvested with respect to its initial investment and any associated potential withholding tax on earnings of itsnon-U.S. subsidiaries subject to the transition tax, as well as with respect to future earnings that will primarily fund the operations of the subsidiary; however, the Company continues to evaluate its position under SAB 118.basis differences is not practicable.  

We account for our uncertain tax positions in accordance with U.S. GAAP. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of these tax benefits is as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31,

  2017   2016   2015 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

(Dollars in thousands)            

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance

  $3,446   $7,318   $7,193 

 

$

31,036

 

 

$

33,054

 

 

$

3,446

 

Increases (decreases) due to foreign currency translations

   —      —      —   

 

 

(632

)

 

 

(2,018

)

 

 

 

Increases (decreases) as a result of positions taken during:

   —      —      —   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prior periods

   —      (3,872   1,238 

 

 

(36

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current period

   29,773    —      1,798 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,773

 

Settlements with taxing authorities

   —      —      —   

Expiration of applicable statutes of limitation

   (165   —      (2,911

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(165

)

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Ending balance(1)

  $33,054   $3,446   $7,318 
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Ending balance

 

$

30,368

 

 

$

31,036

 

 

$

33,054

 

 

(1)Increases in uncertain tax positions are primarily due to acquisition of UNIWHEELS AG. These uncertain tax positions offset certain deferred tax assets of UNIWHEELS AG.

Our policy regarding interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions is to record interest and penalties as an element of income tax expense. At the end of 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015 the companyCompany had liabilities of $2.4$3.9 million, $1.8$3.3 million and $2.1$2.4 million of potential interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions. Included in the unrecognized tax benefits is $1.8$2.6 million that, if recognized, would favorably affect our annual effective tax rate. Within the next twelve-month period we do not expect ano decrease in unrecognized tax benefits.

Income tax returns are filed in multiple jurisdictions and are subject to examination by tax authorities in various jurisdictions where the Company operates. The Company has open tax years from 20132014 to 20172018 with various significant tax jurisdictions.jurisdictions, including ongoing tax audits in the U.S. for 2015 to 2017 and Germany for 2017 and 2018

NOTE 15 16 - LEASES AND RELATED PARTIES

We

Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted ASU 2016-02, ASC 842, “Leases,” the new lease certain land, facilitiesaccounting standard, using the optional transition approach resulting in recognition of operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities of $18.2 million and $18.6 million, respectively, as well as a charge to eliminate previously deferred rent of $0.4 million.

The Company determines whether an arrangement is or contains a lease at the inception of the arrangement. Operating leases are included in other non-current assets, accrued expenses and other non-current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in property, plant and equipment, net, short-term debt and long-term debt (less current portion) in our consolidated balance sheets.

ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of the lease payments over the lease term. Since we generally do not have access to the interest rate implicit in the lease, the Company uses our incremental borrowing rate (for fully collateralized debt) at the inception of the lease in determining the present value of the lease payments. The implicit rate is, however, used where readily available. Lease expense under long-term operating leases expiring at various dates through 2026. Total lease expense for all operating leases amounted to $4.3 million in 2017 and $1.9 million in 2016 and 2015. During 2015, we moved our headquarters from Van Nuys, California to Southfield, Michigan.

Our former headquarters in Van Nuys, California is leased fromrecognized on a straight-line basis over the Louis L. Borick Foundation (the “Foundation”). The Foundation is controlled by Mr. Steven J. Borick, the former Chairman and CEOterm of the company, as Presidentlease. Certain of our leases contain both lease and Director of the Foundation.non-lease components, which are accounted for separately.

The lease providedCompany has operating and finance leases for annual lease paymentsoffice facilities, a data center and certain equipment. The remaining terms of approximately $427,000, through March 2015. In November 2014, the lease was amendedour leases range from over one year to just under nine years. Certain leases include options to extend the lease term for up to ten years, as well as options to terminate both of which have been excluded from March 2015 to March 2017,the term of the lease since exercise of these options is not reasonably certain.

64


Lease expense, cash flow, operating and to reduce the amount of office spacefinance lease assets and annual rent. As amended, beginning April 2015, the annualliabilities, average lease payment is approximately $225,000. The future minimum lease payments thatterm and average discount rate are payable to the Foundation for the Van Nuys administrative office lease total $0.1 million. Total lease payments to these related entities were less than $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.3 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We also have a lease for our headquarters in Southfield, Michigan from October 2015 to September 2026 which is with an unrelated party.as follows:

The following are summarized

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Twelve Months Ended

 

Lease Expense

 

 

 

 

Finance lease expense:

 

 

 

 

Amortization of right-of-use assets

 

$

1,691

 

Interest on lease liabilities

 

 

83

 

Operating lease expense

 

 

3,509

 

Total lease expense

 

$

5,283

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flow Components

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:

 

 

 

 

     Operating cash outflows from finance leases

 

$

83

 

     Operating cash outflows from operating leases

 

 

3,463

 

     Financing cash outflows from finance leases

 

 

1,230

 

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new finance lease liabilities, net of terminations and disposals

 

 

2,573

 

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities (including adoption impact of $18.2 million) net of terminations and disposals

 

 

18,961

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

Balance Sheet Information

 

 

 

 

Operating leases:

 

 

 

 

     Other non-current assets

 

$

15,201

 

     Accrued liabilities

 

$

(2,949

)

     Other non-current liabilities

 

 

(13,282

)

          Total operating lease liabilities

 

$

(16,231

)

 

 

 

 

 

Finance leases:

 

 

 

 

     Property and equipment gross

 

$

4,821

 

     Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(2,118

)

     Property and equipment, net

 

$

2,703

 

     Current portion of long-term debt

 

$

(1,023

)

     Long-term debt

 

 

(2,045

)

          Total finance lease liabilities

 

$

(3,068

)

 

 

 

 

 

Lease Term and Discount Rates

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average remaining lease term - finance leases (years)

 

4.1

 

Weighted-average remaining lease term - operating leases (years)

 

6.4

 

Weighted-average discount rate - finance leases

 

 

2.9

%

Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases

 

 

3.9

%

65


Summarized future minimum payments under all leases:our leases are as follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

Year Ended December 31,

  Operating
Leases
 
(Dollars in thousands)    

2018

  $4,447 

 

2019

 

 

Finance Leases

 

 

Operating Leases

 

Lease Maturities (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

$

1,175

 

 

$

3,508

 

2021

 

 

908

 

 

 

3,034

 

2022

 

 

502

 

 

 

2,505

 

2023

 

 

128

 

 

 

2,185

 

2024

 

 

123

 

 

 

2,030

 

Thereafter

 

 

434

 

 

 

4,941

 

Total

 

 

3,270

 

 

 

18,203

 

Less: Imputed interest

 

 

(202

)

 

 

(1,972

)

Total lease liabilities, net of interest

 

$

3,068

 

 

$

16,231

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summarized future minimum payments for our leases under ASC 840 are as follows:

Summarized future minimum payments for our leases under ASC 840 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Leases

 

 

 

 

 

Lease Maturities (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

   3,242 

 

$

4,249

 

 

 

 

 

2020

   3,207 

 

 

3,232

 

 

 

 

 

2021

   2,845 

 

 

2,870

 

 

 

 

 

2022

   2,463 

 

 

2,635

 

 

 

 

 

2023

 

 

2,346

 

 

 

 

 

Thereafter

   7,192 

 

 

7,647

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 
  $23,396 
  

 

 

Total

 

$

22,979

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase Agreement

In the first quarter of 2015, we entered into an agreement to purchase a subscription to online software provided by NGS Inc. Our Senior Vice President, Business Operations, is a passive investorThe 2018 disclosure includes certain non-lease components that have been excluded from our ASC 842 accounting and our Vice President of Information Technology is also a passive investor in NGS. We made payments to NGS of $376,920 and $243,000 during the 2017 and 2016 fiscal year, respectively. The transaction was entered into in the ordinary course of business and is an arms-length transaction.disclosures for 2019.

NOTE 1617 - RETIREMENT PLANS

We have an unfunded salary continuation plan covering certain directors, officers and other key members of management. We purchase life insurance policies on certain participants to provide in part for future liabilities. Cash surrender value of these policies, totaling $8.0 million and $7.5 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, are included in othernon-current assets in the company’s consolidated balance sheets. Subject to certain vesting requirements, the plan provides for a benefit based on final average compensation, which becomes payable on the employee’s death or upon attaining age 65, if retired. The plan was closed to new participants effective February 3, 2011. We have measuredpurchased life insurance policies on certain participants to provide in part for future liabilities. Cash surrender value of these policies, totaling $8.1 million, are included in other non-current assets in the plan assets and obligationsCompany’s condensed consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2018. In the second quarter of 2019, we terminated our salary continuation planlife insurance policies in exchange for all periods presented.the cash surrender value of $7.6 million. We also received $0.6 million for death benefit claims.

The following table summarizes the changes in plan assets and plan benefit obligations:

 

Year Ended December 31,

  2017   2016 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in benefit obligation

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning benefit obligation

  $27,612   $28,399 

 

$

26,953

 

 

$

29,759

 

Service cost

   —      —   

Interest cost

   1,189    1,216 

 

 

1,144

 

 

 

1,086

 

Actuarial gain (loss)

   2,300    (464

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

 

4,295

 

 

 

(2,486

)

Benefit payments

   (1,342   (1,539

 

 

(1,391

)

 

 

(1,406

)

  

 

   

 

 

Ending benefit obligation

  $29,759   $27,612 

 

$

31,001

 

 

$

26,953

 

  

 

   

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in plan assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

 

$

 

 

$

 

Employer contribution

 

 

1,391

 

 

 

1,406

 

Benefit payments

 

 

(1,391

)

 

 

(1,406

)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

 

$

 

 

$

 

Funded status

 

$

(31,001

)

 

$

(26,953

)

Amounts recognized in the consolidated

   balance sheets consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued expenses

 

$

(1,478

)

 

$

(1,392

)

Other non-current liabilities

 

 

(29,523

)

 

 

(25,561

)

Net amount recognized

 

$

(31,001

)

 

$

(26,953

)

Amounts recognized in accumulated other

   comprehensive loss consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial loss

 

$

8,940

 

 

$

4,799

 

Prior service cost

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(1

)

Net amount recognized, before tax effect

 

$

8,939

 

 

$

4,798

 

Weighted average assumptions used to

   determine benefit obligations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

 

 

3.3

%

 

 

4.4

%

Rate of compensation increase

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

3.0

%

 

Year Ended December 31,

  2017  2016 
(Dollars in thousands)       

Change in plan assets

   

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

  $—    $—   

Employer contribution

   1,342   1,539 

Benefit payments

   (1,342  (1,539
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

  $—    $—   
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Funded status

  $(29,759 $(27,612
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:

   

Accrued expenses

   (1,407  (1,177

Othernon-current liabilities

   (28,352  (26,435
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net amount recognized

  $(29,759 $(27,612
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of:

   

Net actuarial loss

  $7,722  $5,692 

Prior service cost

   (1  (1
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net amount recognized, before tax effect

  $7,721  $5,691 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:

   

Discount rate

   3.7  4.4

Rate of compensation increase

   3.0  3.0

Components of net periodic pension cost are described in the following table:

 

Year Ended December 31,

  2017 2016 2015 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

(Dollars in thousands)        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Components of net periodic pension cost:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service cost

  $—    $—    $44 

Interest cost

   1,189  1,216  1,230 

 

$

1,144

 

 

$

1,086

 

 

$

1,189

 

Amortization of actuarial loss

   369  335  535 

 

 

209

 

 

 

438

 

 

 

369

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net periodic pension cost

   1,558  $1,551  $1,809 

 

$

1,353

 

 

$

1,524

 

 

$

1,558

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost:

Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

   4.4 4.4 4.2

 

 

4.4

%

 

 

3.7

%

 

 

4.4

%

Rate of compensation increase

   3.0 3.0 3.0

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

3.0

%

 

 

3.0

%

The decrease in the 2017 net periodic pension cost compared to the 2016 cost was primarily due to decreased amortization of actuarial losses. The decrease in the 2016 net periodic pension cost compared to the 2015 cost was primarily due to decreased amortization of actuarial losses and decreased service cost from terminations and retirements.

Benefit payments during the next ten years, which reflect applicable future service, are as follows:

 

Year Ended December 31,

  Amount 

 

Amount

 

(Dollars in thousands)    

 

 

 

 

2018

  $1,433 

2019

  $1,410 

2020

  $1,468 

 

$

1,502

 

2021

  $1,442 

 

$

1,478

 

2022

  $1,479 

 

$

1,518

 

Years 2023 to 2027

  $8,282 

2023

 

$

1,497

 

2024

 

$

1,535

 

Years 2025 to 2029

 

$

8,870

 

The following is an estimate of the components of net periodic pension cost in 2018:2020:

 

Estimated Year Ended December 31,

  2018 

 

2020

 

(Dollars in thousands)    

 

 

 

 

Service cost

  $—   

Interest cost

   1,086 

 

 

1,004

 

Amortization of actuarial loss

   437 

 

 

289

 

  

 

 

Estimated 2018 net periodic pension cost

  $1,523 
  

 

 

Estimated 2020 net periodic pension cost

 

$

1,293

 

67


Other Retirement Plans

We also contribute to employee retirement savings plans in the U.S. and Mexico that cover substantially all of our employees in those countries. The employer contribution totaled $1.7$1.5 million, $1.4$1.8 million and $1.5$1.7 million for the three years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

NOTE 1718 - ACCRUED EXPENSES

 

December 31,

  2017   2016 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payroll and related benefits

  $27,954   $12,766 

 

$

25,048

 

 

$

23,503

 

Insurance reserves

 

 

840

 

 

 

1,120

 

Taxes, other than income taxes

   9,419    7,325 

 

 

12,096

 

 

 

8,115

 

Current portion of derivative liability

   6,595    10,076 

 

 

4,357

 

 

 

2,506

 

Dividends

   7,322    5,127 

Dividends and interest

 

 

1,247

 

 

 

4,197

 

Deferred tooling revenue

   4,654    5,419 

 

 

5,880

 

 

 

5,810

 

Current portion of executive retirement liabilities

   1,407    1,177 

 

 

1,478

 

 

 

1,392

 

Professional fees

 

 

2,216

 

 

 

4,750

 

Warranty liability

 

 

143

 

 

 

437

 

Other

   11,435    4,425 

 

 

7,540

 

 

 

13,832

 

  

 

   

 

 

Accrued liabilities

  $68,786   $46,315 

 

$

60,845

 

 

$

65,662

 

  

 

   

 

 

NOTE 1819 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Equity Incentive Plan

Our 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was approved by stockholders in May 2018 and amended and restated the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan. The Plan

Our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), authorizes us to issue up to 3.54.35 million shares of common stock, along withnon-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and performance units to our officers, key employees,non-employee directors and consultants. At December 31,

2017, 2019, there were 1.71.6 million shares available for future grants under this Plan. No more than 600,0001.2 million shares may be used under the Plan as “full value” awards, which include restricted stock and performance stock units. It is our policy to issue shares from authorized but not issued shares upon the exercise of stock options.

During the first quarter of 2015, the company implemented a long-term incentive program for the benefit of certain members of company management. The program was designed to strengthen employee retention and to provide a more structured incentive program to stimulate improvement in future company results. Per

Under the terms of the program,Plan, each year eligible participants wereare granted in 2015, 2016 and 2017, time value restricted stock units (“RSUs”), vesting ratably over a three-year time period, and performance restricted stock units (“PSUs”), with a three-year cliff vesting. Upon vesting, each restricted stock award is exchangeable for one share of the company’sCompany’s common stock, with accrued dividends. The PSUs are categorized further into three individual categories whose vesting is contingent upon the achievement of certain targets as follows:

 

40 percent of

Other Awards

On May 16, 2019 the PSUs vest upon certain Return on Invested Capital targets for 2017, 2016Company granted the following equity awards to Majdi B. Abulaban, our President and 2015 units

40 percent of the PSUs vest upon certain Cumulative EPS targets for 2017 and 2016 units

40 percent of the PSUs vest upon certain EBITDA margin targets for 2015 units

20 percent of the PSUs vest upon certain market based Shareholder Return targets for 2017, 2016 and 2015 units

Other Awards

During 2014, we granted 132,455 restricted shares, including 50,000 shares vesting April 30, 2017, and 82,455 shares vesting on December 31, 2016 under anChief Executive Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”). The fair value of each of these restricted shares was $19.44. These grants were made outside of the Plan as inducement grantsOfficer, in connection with his entering into employment with the appointmentCompany and the 2019 Inducement Grant Plan (the “Inducement Plan”): (i) an initial award consisting of our current CEO(a) 666,667 PSUs at target, vesting in three approximately equal installments, to the extent the performance metrics are satisfied, during each of three performance periods and company President. Beginning(b) 333,333 RSUs, vesting in 2015,approximately equal installments on February 28, 2020, 2021 and 2022; (ii) a 2019-2021 PSU grant, with the CEOtarget number of 316,832 PSUs, which will vest to the extent the performance metrics are satisfied; and (iii) a 2019 RSU grant of 158,416 RSUs, vesting in approximately equal installments on February 28, 2020, 2021 and 2022. The PSU awards may be granted restricted stock unit awards each year under Superior’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, or any successor equity plan. Under the CEO’s Employment Agreement, time-vested restricted stock units will be granted each year with cliff vestingearned at the third fiscal year end following grant. The CEO will also be granted performance-vested restricted stock units each year, vesting based on company performance goals established by the independent compensation committee during the three fiscal years following the grant.

Options

Options are granted at not less than fair market valueup to 200 percent of target depending on the datelevel of grant and expire no later than ten years afterachievement of the date of grant. Options and restricted shares granted under this Plan generally require no less than a three-year ratable vesting period. Stock option activity in 2017 and 2016 are summarized in the following table:performance metrics.

 

   Outstanding   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Balance at December 31, 2015

   376,033   $18.89    3.6   $452,128 

Granted

   —     $—       

Exercised

   (86,908  $18.77     

Canceled

   (24,750  $21.51     

Expired

   (32,750  $17.56     
  

 

 

       

Balance at December 31, 2016

   231,625   $18.88    3.1   $1,845,263 

Granted

   —      —       

Exercised

   (2,000  $16.76     

Canceled

   (6,000  $21.09     

Expired

   (78,000  $18.62     
  

 

 

       

Balance at December 31, 2017

   145,625   $18.96     
  

 

 

       

Options vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2017

   145,625   $18.96    2.0   $—   
  

 

 

       

Exercisable at December 31, 2017

   145,625       
  

 

 

       

 

 

Equity Incentive Awards

 

 

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

 

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value

 

 

Performance Shares

 

 

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value

 

 

Options

 

 

Weighted Average

Exercise Price

 

Balance at December 31, 2018

 

 

183,726

 

 

$

17.26

 

 

 

296,523

 

 

$

19.10

 

 

 

59,000

 

 

$

18.33

 

Granted

 

 

1,083,999

 

 

 

4.88

 

 

 

1,548,098

 

 

 

6.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Settled

 

 

(103,681

)

 

 

17.12

 

 

 

(31,081

)

 

 

22.81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited or expired

 

 

(116,788

)

 

 

8.92

 

 

 

(264,747

)

 

 

11.92

 

 

 

(8,750

)

 

 

15.30

 

Balance at December 31, 2019

 

 

1,047,256

 

 

$

5.39

 

 

 

1,548,793

 

 

$

7.17

 

 

 

50,250

 

 

$

18.86

 

Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2019

 

 

933,826

 

 

$

5.44

 

 

 

1,340,263

 

 

$

6.20

 

 

 

50,250

 

 

$

18.86

 


We received cash proceeds of less than $0.1Stock-based compensation expense was $5.7 million, $1.6$2.1 million and $7.3 million from stock options exercised in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was less than $0.1 million, $0.7 million and $0.8$1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Upon the exercise of stock options and the issuance of restricted stock awards, it is our policy to only issue shares from authorized common stock.

The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pretax difference between the closing stock price on the last trading day of the reporting period and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number ofin-the-money options. This is the amount that would have been received by the option holders had they exercised and sold their options on that day. This amount varies based on changes in the fair market value of our common stock. The closing price of our common stock on the last trading day of our fiscal year was $14.85.

Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are summarized in the following tables:

Range of

Exercise Prices

  

Options

Outstanding

at
12/31/2017

  

Weighted
Average
Remaining

Contractual
Life (in
Years)

   

Weighted
Average
Exercise

Price

   

Options

Exercisable

at
12/31/2017

   

Weighted
Average
Exercise

Price

 
$15.17   —    $15.75   29,375   1.6   $15.17    29,375   $15.17 
$15.76   —    $16.54   24,250   2.4   $16.32    24,250   $16.32 
$16.55   —    $19.65   22,000   4.5   $17.07    22,000   $17.07 
$19.66   —    $22.21   49,000   0.4   $21.84    49,000   $21.84 
$22.22   —    $22.57   21,000   3.4   $22.57    21,000   $22.57 
   

 

 

      

 

 

   
   145,625   2.0   $18.96    145,625   $18.96 
  

 

 

      

 

 

   

Range of

Exercise Prices

  

Options

Outstanding

at
12/31/2016

  

Weighted
Average
Remaining

Contractual
Life (in
Years)

   

Weighted
Average
Exercise

Price

   

Options

Exercisable

at
12/31/2016

   

Weighted
Average
Exercise

Price

 
$15.17   —    $16.54   54,625   3.0   $15.68    54,625   $15.68 
$16.55   —    $17.58   36,000   5.5   $16.95    36,000   $16.95 
$17.59   —    $20.20   54,000   2.3   $18.16    54,000   $18.16 
$20.21   —    $22.21   51,000   1.4   $21.84    51,000   $21.84 
$22.22   —    $22.57   36,000   4.4   $22.57    36,000   $22.57 
   

 

 

      

 

 

   
   231,625   3.1   $18.88    231,625   $18.88 
  

 

 

      

 

 

   

Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock awards, or “full value” awards, generally vest ratably over no less than a three-year period. Shares of restricted stock granted under the Plan are considered issued and outstanding at the date of grant, have the same dividend and voting rights as other outstanding common stock, are subject to forfeiture if employment terminates prior to vesting, and are expensed ratably over the vesting period. Dividends paid on the restricted shares granted under the Plan arenon-forfeitable if the restricted shares do not ultimately vest. Restricted stock activity in 2017 and 2016 are summarized in the following table:

   Number
of Awards
   Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Amortization
Period (in
Years)
 

Balance at December 31, 2015

   192,293   $19.20    1.7 

Granted

   —     $—     

Vested

   (42,546  $18.47   

Canceled

   (5,452  $18.75   
  

 

 

     

Balance at December 31, 2016

   144,295   $19.43    0.5 

Granted

   —     $—     

Vested

   (140,628  $19.43   

Canceled

   (3,667  $19.16   
  

 

 

     

Balance at December 31, 2017

   —     $—      —   
  

 

 

     

Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock unit activity in 2017 and 2016 are summarized in the following table:

   Number
of Awards
   Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Amortization
Period (in
Years)
 

Balance at December 31, 2015

   53,323   $18.78    2.1 

Granted

   84,200   $23.71   

Vested

   (7,227  $18.78   

Canceled

   (2,729  $18.78   
  

 

 

     

Balance at December 31, 2016

   127,567   $22.03    1.7 

Granted

   131,656   $22.24   

Vested

   (67,889  $21.54   

Canceled

   (22,068  $22.95   
  

 

 

     

Balance at December 31, 2017

   169,266   $22.27    1.6 
  

 

 

     

Restricted Performance Stock Units

Restricted performance stock unit activity in 2017 and 2016 are summarized in the following table:

   Number
of Awards
   Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Amortization
Period (in
Years)
 

Balance at December 31, 2015

   106,647   $18.78    2.0 

Granted

   127,139   $23.14   

Vested

   —     $—     

Canceled

   (6,593  $19.92   
  

 

 

     

Balance at December 31, 2016

   227,193   $21.72    1.6 

Granted

   164,566   $22.39   

Vested

   (71,493  $19.00   

Added by performance factor

   4,268    19.00   

Canceled

   (84,860  $22.76   
  

 

 

     

Balance at December 31, 2017

   239,674   $22.58    1.7 
  

 

 

     

Stock Based Compensation

Stock-basedUnrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to our equity incentive plans in accordance with U.S. GAAP was allocated as follows:

Year Ended December 31,

  2017   2016   2015 
(Thousands of dollars)            

Cost of sales

  $452   $472   $370 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   2,124    3,218    2,437 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense before income taxes

   2,576    3,690    2,807 

Income tax benefit

   (970   (1,361   (1,044
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stock-based compensation expense after income taxes

  $1,606   $2,329   $1,763 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Asnon-vested awards of December 31, 2017, a total of $2.5$7.7 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related tonon-vested awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.61.8 years. There were no significant capitalized stock-based compensation costs at December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015.

NOTE 19 - COMMON STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAMS

In October 2014, our Board of Directors approved the 2014 Repurchase Program, which authorized the repurchase of up to $30.0 million of our common stock. Under the 2014 Repurchase Program, we repurchased common stock from time to time on the open market or in private transactions. Shares repurchased under the 2014 Repurchase Program during 2015 totaled 1,056,954 shares at a cost of $19.6 million. The 2014 Repurchase Program was completed in the beginning of 2016, with purchases of 585,970 shares for a cost of $10.3 million. The repurchased shares described above were either canceled and retired or added to treasury stock after the reincorporation in Delaware in 2015.

In January of 2016, our Board of Directors approved the 2016 Repurchase Program, which authorized the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of common stock. Under the 2016 Repurchase Program, we may repurchase common stock from time to time on the open market or in private transactions. During 2016, we repurchased 454,718 shares of company stock at a cost of $10.4 million under the 2016 Repurchase Program. In the aggregate, we purchased $20.7 million in company stock during 2016 under the 2014 Repurchase Program and 2016 Repurchase Program. During 2017, we purchased an additional 215,841 shares of company stock at a cost of $5.0 million under the 2016 Repurchase Program.

NOTE 20 - RISK MANAGEMENTCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

We are subject to various risks and uncertainties in the ordinary course of business due, in part, to the competitive global nature of the industry in which we operate, changing commodity prices for the materials used in the manufacture of our products and the development of new products.

We have operations in Mexico with sale and purchase transactions denominated in both Pesos and dollars. The Peso is the functional currency of certain of our operations in Mexico. The settlement of accounts receivable and accounts payable for our operations in Mexico requires the transfer of funds denominated in the Mexican peso, the value of which increased 5.1 percent in relation to the U.S. dollar in 2017. Foreign currency transaction gains totaled $11.0 million in 2017, and foreign currency losses were $0.4 million and $1.2 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively. In addition to gains on Peso foreign currency transactions, the 2017 foreign currency transaction gains include an $8.2 million realized gain on a Zloty forward contract used to hedge the acquisition purchase price, partially offset by $2.5 million unrealized loss on a Euro cross currency swap. All transaction gains and losses are included in other income (expense), net, in the consolidated income statements.

As it relates to foreign currency translation gains and losses, however, since 1990, the Mexican peso has experienced periods of relative stability followed by periods of major declines in value. The impact of these changes in value relative to our Mexico operations resulted in a cumulative unrealized translation loss at December 31, 2017 of $101.0 million. Translation gains and losses are included in other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

We also have operations in Europe with sale and purchase transactions denominated in Euros and Zlotys. The Euro is the functional currency of our operations in Europe. A significant component of our European production operations is located in Poland. The settlement of accounts receivable and accounts payable for these operations requires the transfer of funds denominated in Zlotys. The value of the Euro has increased 7.2 percent in relation to the U.S. dollar in the seven months following the acquisition of Uniwheels ended December 31, 2017. During that same period, the value of the Zloty has remained relatively flat in relation to the Euro. Foreign currency transaction gains totaled $1.9 million for the seven months ended December 31, 2017. All transaction gains and losses are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated income statements.

As it relates to foreign currency translation gains and losses, the Euro has experienced periods of relative stability in value. The impact of changes in value relative to our European operations resulted in a cumulative unrealized translation gain at December 31, 2017 of $26.2 million. Translation gains and losses are included in other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.Purchase Commitments

When market conditions warrant, we may also enter into purchase commitments to secure the supply of certain commodities used in the manufacture of our products, such as aluminum, natural gas and other raw materials. However,Prices under our European business had entered into forwardaluminum contracts are based on a market index,  the London Mercantile Exchange (LME), and regional premiums for processing, transportation and alloy components which are adjusted quarterly for purchases in the ensuing quarter. Changes in aluminum prices are generally passed through to hedge price fluctuationsour OEM customers and adjusted on a quarterly basis. Certain of our purchase agreements include volume commitments, however any excess commitments are generally negotiated with suppliers and those which have occurred in its aluminum raw materials. At December 31, 2017, the fair value asset relatingpast have been carried over to foreign contracts for aluminum was $1.8 million.future periods.  

NOTE 21 - CONTINGENCIESContingencies

We are party to various legal and environmental proceedings incidental to our business. Certain claims, suits and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business have been filed or are pending against us. Based on facts now known, we believe all such matters are adequately provided for, covered by insurance, are without merit and/or involve such amounts that would not materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

NOTE 21 - RECEIVABLES SECURITIZATION

The Company sells certain customer trade receivables on a non-recourse basis under factoring arrangements with designated financial institutions. These transactions are accounted for as sales and cash proceeds are included in cash provided by operating activities. Factoring arrangements incorporate customary representations and warranties, including representations as to validity of amounts due, completeness of performance obligations and absence of commercial disputes. During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company sold trade receivables totaling $334.1 million and $276.8 million, respectively, and incurred factoring fees of $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively, which are included in other (expense) income, net. The collective limit under our factoring arrangements was $117.3 million as of December 31, 2019 and $80.9 million as of December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2019, $49.6 million of receivables had been factored under the arrangements. As of  December 31, 2018, $53.8 million of receivables had been factored under the arrangements.

NOTE 22 - RELATED PARTIES

Purchase Agreement

In the first quarter of 2015, we entered into an agreement to purchase a subscription to online software provided by NGS Inc. Our former Senior Vice President, Business Operations and our Vice President of Information Technology are passive investors in NGS. We made payments to NGS of $479,520, $479,520, and $376,920 during 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The transaction was entered into in the ordinary course of business and is an arms-length agreement.

NOTE 23 - RESTRUCTURING

During the third quarter of 2019, the Company initiated a plan to significantly reduce production and manufacturing operations at its Fayetteville, Arkansas location. As a result, the Company recognized a non-cash charge of $13.0 million in cost of sales, comprised of (1) $7.6 million of accelerated depreciation for excess equipment, (2) $3.2 million relating to the write-down of certain supplies inventory to net salvage value, (3) $1.6 million of employee severance and (4) $0.6 million of accelerated amortization of right of use assets under operating leases. In  addition, relocation costs for redeployment of machinery and equipment of $1.8 million were recognized in the fourth quarter of 2019.  Additional relocation costs are expected to be incurred over the next 12-18 months. As of December 31, 2019, $1.1 million of the restructuring severance accrual remains and is expected to be paid in full by the end of the second quarter of 2020.   

69


NOTE 24 - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Year 2017

  First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 Year 

Year 2019

 

First

Quarter

 

 

Second

Quarter

 

 

Third

Quarter

 

 

Fourth

Quarter

 

 

Year

 

Net sales

  $174,220  240,628  331,404  361,803  1,108,055 

 

$

357,693

 

 

$

352,499

 

 

$

352,014

 

 

$

310,281

 

 

$

1,372,487

 

Gross profit

  $19,204  20,105  23,893  39,695  102,897 

 

$

33,122

 

 

$

39,995

 

 

$

16,047

 

 

$

26,898

 

 

$

116,062

 

Income (loss) from operations

  $3,944  (1,998 5,758  13,814  21,518 

 

$

18,639

 

 

$

24,031

 

 

$

(243

)

 

$

(92,486

)

 

$

(50,059

)

Consolidated income (loss) before income taxes

  $3,300  (9,241 (501 7,308  866 

 

$

6,893

 

 

$

14,811

 

 

$

(11,416

)

 

$

(103,325

)

 

$

(93,037

)

Income tax (provision) benefit

  $(198 1,722  3,355  (11,754 (6,875

 

$

(4,943

)

 

$

(7,541

)

 

$

4,785

 

 

$

4,276

 

 

$

(3,423

)

Consolidated net income (loss)

  $3,102  (7,519 2,854  (4,446 (6,009

 

$

1,950

 

 

$

7,270

 

 

$

(6,631

)

 

$

(99,049

)

 

$

(96,460

)

Less: Net (income) loss attributable tonon-controlling interest

non-controlling interest

   —    247  (239 (202 (194

Net income (loss) attributable to Superior

   3,102  (7,272 2,615  (4,648 (6,203

Income (loss) per share:

      

Earnings (loss) per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

  $0.12  (0.41 (0.22 (0.50 (1.01

 

$

(0.24

)

 

$

(0.04

)

 

$

(0.57

)

 

$

(4.25

)

 

$

(5.10

)

Diluted

  $0.12  (0.41 (0.22 (0.50 (1.01

 

$

(0.24

)

 

$

(0.04

)

 

$

(0.57

)

 

$

(4.25

)

 

$

(5.10

)

Dividends declared per share

  $0.18  0.09  0.09  0.09  0.45 

 

$

0.09

 

 

$

0.09

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

0.18

 

 

Year 2016

  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
   Fourth
Quarter
  Year 

Net sales

  $186,065  $182,709  $175,580   $188,323  $732,677 

Gross profit

  $27,715  $29,540  $10,981   $17,968  $86,204 

Income from operations

  $18,722  $19,540  $5,250   $11,090  $54,602 

Income before income taxes

  $19,022  $19,247  $4,910   $11,542  $54,721 

Income tax (provision) benefit

  $(4,558 $(6,082 $1,064   $(3,764 $(13,340

Net income

  $14,464  $13,165  $5,974   $7,778  $41,381 

Income per share:

       

Basic

  $0.56  $0.52  $0.24   $0.31  $1.63 

Diluted

  $0.56  $0.52  $0.23   $0.31  $1.62 

Dividends declared per share

  $0.18  $0.18  $0.18   $0.18  $0.72 

Year 2018

 

First

Quarter

 

 

Second

Quarter

 

 

Third

Quarter

 

 

Fourth

Quarter

 

 

Year

 

Net sales

 

$

386,448

 

 

$

388,944

 

 

$

347,612

 

 

$

378,823

 

 

$

1,501,827

 

Gross profit

 

$

49,991

 

 

$

53,559

 

 

$

23,673

 

 

$

36,304

 

 

$

163,527

 

Income from operations

 

$

27,634

 

 

$

31,270

 

 

$

7,688

 

 

$

19,213

 

 

$

85,805

 

Consolidated income (loss) before income taxes

 

$

13,687

 

 

$

12,930

 

 

$

(7,714

)

 

$

13,349

 

 

$

32,252

 

Income tax (provision) benefit

 

$

(3,370

)

 

$

(4,795

)

 

$

7,051

 

 

$

(5,177

)

 

$

(6,291

)

Consolidated net income (loss)

 

$

10,317

 

 

$

8,135

 

 

$

(663

)

 

$

8,172

 

 

$

25,961

 

Earnings (loss) per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.07

 

 

$

(0.02

)

 

$

(0.37

)

 

$

0.61

 

 

$

0.29

 

Diluted

 

$

0.07

 

 

$

(0.02

)

 

$

(0.37

)

 

$

0.61

 

 

$

0.29

 

Dividends declared per share

 

$

0.09

 

 

$

0.09

 

 

$

0.09

 

 

$

0.09

 

 

$

0.36

 

70


ITEM 9 - CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTSACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls

We acquired Uniwheels on May 30, 2017 and are in the process of reviewing and evaluating their internal controls as a part of the process of aligning and integrating the business and operations.    SEC guidance allows companies to exclude acquisitions from their assessment of internal control over financial reporting during the first year of acquisition while integrating the acquired company. Accordingly, the scope of our assessment of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures does not include internal control over financial reporting relating to Uniwheels constituted 32.8 percent of our total assets as of December 31, 2017 (excluding goodwill and intangibles which are included within the scope of the assessment), and 33.9 percent of our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The company’sCompany’s management, with the participation of the CEOour Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the company’sCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2017.2019. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEOChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 20172019 our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Rule13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the companyCompany are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’sCompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

As previously mentioned, we acquired Uniwheels on May 30, 2017 and are in the process of reviewing and evaluating its internal control over financial reporting as a part of the process of aligning and integrating the business and operations.    SEC guidance allows companies to exclude acquisitions from their assessment of internal control over financial reporting during the first year of acquisition while integrating the acquired company. Accordingly, the scope of our assessment does not include internal control over financial reporting relating to Uniwheels. Uniwheels constituted 32.8 percent of our total assets as of December 31, 2017 (excluding goodwill and intangibles which are included within the scope of the assessment) assets recorded as part of the purchase accounting), and 33.9 percent of our net sales for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changing conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’sCompany’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172019 based upon criteria established in the2013Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment, management determined that our internal control over financial reporting excluding the recently acquired Uniwheels business, was effective as of December 31, 20172019 based on the criteria in the2013 Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

The effectiveness of the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172019 has been audited by Deloitte and Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included in this Annual Report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Other than the acquisition of Uniwheels referenced above, thereThere has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20172019 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B - OTHER INFORMATION

None.

71


PARTPART III

ITEM 10 - DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Except as set forth herein, the information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our 20182020 Proxy Statement.

Executive Officers - The names of corporate executive officers as of fiscal year end who are not also Directors are listed at the end of Part I of this Annual Report. Information regarding executive officers who are Directors is contained in our 20182020 Proxy Statement under the caption “Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors.” Such information is incorporated herein by reference. With the exception of the CEO, allAll executive officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the will of the Board of Directors. For a description of the CEO’sChief Executive Officer’s employment agreement, see “Executive Compensation and Related Information - Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in our 20182020 Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Code of Ethics - Included on our website, www.supind.com, under “Investors,“Investor Relations,” is our Code of Conduct, which, among others, applies to our CEO, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer. Copies of our Code of Conduct are available, without charge, from Superior Industries International, Inc., Shareholder Relations, 26600 Telegraph Road, Suite 400, Southfield, Michigan 48033.

ITEM 11 - EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information relating to Executive Compensation is set forth under the captions “Compensation of Directors” and “Executive Compensation and Related Information - Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in our 20182020 Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12 - SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information related to Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters is set forth under the caption “Voting Securities and Principal Ownership” in our 20182020 Proxy Statement. Also see Note 18,19, “Stock Based Compensation” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.

ITEM 13 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information related to Certain Relationships and Related Transactions is set forth under the caption, “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” in our 20182020 Proxy Statement, and in Note 15, “Leases and Related22, “Related Parties” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.

ITEM 14 - PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information related to Principal Accountant Fees and Services is set forth under the caption “Proposal No. 43 - Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in our 20182020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

72


PART IV

ITEM 15 - EXHIBITS, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)

The following documents are filed as a part of this report:

 

1.

Financial Statements: See the “Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule” in Item 8 of this Annual Report.

 

2.

Financial Statement Schedule

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017

 

3.

Exhibits

    2.1

3.Exhibits

    2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger of Superior Industries International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed May 21, 2015).
    2.2Undertaking Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2017, between Superior Industries International, Inc. and Uniwheels Holding (Malta) Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed March  24, 2017).

    2.3

    2.2

Combination Agreement, dated March 23, 2017, between Superior Industries International, Inc. and Uniwheels AG (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed March 24, 2017).

    3.1

Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed May 21, 2015).

    3.2

Amended and RestatedBy-Laws of the Registrant effective as of October  25, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed October 30, 2017).

    3.3

Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Perpetual Preferred Stock of Superior Industries International, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed May 26, 2017).

    3.4

Certificate of Correction, filed in the State of Delaware on November 7, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018).

    4.1

Form of Superior Industries International, Inc.‘s’s Common Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed May 21, 2015).

    4.2

Indenture, dated as of June 15, 2017, among Superior Industries International, Inc., the subsidiaries of Superior identified therein, The Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, Luxembourg Branch, as registrar and transfer agent and The Bank of New York Mellon acting through its London Branch, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed June 20, 2017).

  10.1

4.3

2003 Equity Incentive PlanDescription of the Registrant (Incorporated by referenceRegistrant’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Exhibit 99.1 to Registrant’s FormS-8 dated July 28, 2003. RegistrationNo. 333-107380).Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.**

  10.2

  10.1

Salary Continuation Plan of The Registrant, amended and restated as of November 14, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).*

  10.3

  10.2

2008 Equity Incentive Plan of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 28, 2008).*

  10.4

  10.3

2008 Equity Incentive Plan Notice of Stock Option Grant and Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s FormS-8 filed November 10, 2008. RegistrationNo. 333-155258).*

  10.5

  10.4

Employment letter between the Registrant and Kerry A. Shiba, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the period ended September 26, 2010).*
  10.6

Form of Notice of Grant and Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to Registrant’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed May 20, 2010).*

  10.7

  10.5

Second Amendment to Sublease Agreement dated April  1, 2010 by and among The Louis L. Borick Trust and The Nita Borick Management Trust and Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed March  25, 2010).
  10.82010 Employee Incentive Plan of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.14 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010).*
  10.9Superior Industries International, Inc. Annual Incentive Performance Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K dated March 24, 2011).*
  10.10Superior Industries International, Inc. CEO Annual Incentive Performance Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K dated March 24, 2011).*
  10.11

Superior Industries International, Inc. Executive Change in Control Severance Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K dated March 24, 2011).*

  10.12

  10.6

Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed May 23, 2013).*

73


  10.7

  10.13

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Superior Industries International, Inc. Amended and Restated Executive Employment2008 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).*

  10.8

Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement dated August  10, 2016, betweenunder the RegistrantSuperior Industries International, Inc. Amended and Donald J. Stebbins.Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).*

  10.9

Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Superior Industries International, Inc. Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 29, 2016).*

  10.10

Superior Industries International, Inc. Annual Incentive Performance Plan (Incorporated by reference to Annex A to Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14-A filed on March 25, 2016).*

  10.11

2018 Equity Incentive Plan of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018).*

  10.12

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Superior Industries International, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018).*

  10.13

Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Superior Industries International, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018).*

  10.14

Offer Letter of Employment, dated July 28, 2017 between Superior Industries International, Inc. and Joanne Finnorn (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017).*

  10.15

Offer Letter Offer Letter of Employment, dated August 23, 2018, between Superior Industries International, Inc. and Matti Masanovich (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K dated August 11, 2016) filed September 14, 2018).*

  10.14

  10.17

Indemnification Agreement, dated March 23, 2017, between Superior Industries International, Inc. and Uniwheels Holding (Malta) Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 24, 2017).

  10.18

Investment Agreement, dated March 22, 2017, between Superior Industries International, Inc., and TPG Growth III Sidewall, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 24, 2017).

  10.19

Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2017, by and between Superior Industries International, Inc. and TPG Growth III Sidewall, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 26, 2017).

  10.20

English Translation of the Domination and Profit Transfer Agreement between Superior Industries International Germany AG and UNIWHEELS AG, dated December 5, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 11, 2017).

  10.21

Credit agreementAgreement dated December 19, 2014 between Superior Industries International, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed December 23, 2014).

  10.15

  10.22

Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement dated as of March 3, 2015, by and among Superior Industries International, Inc., the Lenders from time to time a party thereto and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2015).

  10.16

  10.23

Consent and Amendment No. 2 dated as of October 14, 2015 to the Credit Agreement dated as of December 19, 2014, by and among Superior Industries International, Inc., the Lenders from time to time party thereto and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrator (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2015).

  10.17

  10.24

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Superior Industries International, Inc. Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).*
  10.18Form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Superior Industries International, Inc. Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).*
  10.19Form ofNon-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Superior Industries International, Inc. Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed on July 29, 2016).*

74


  10.24

  10.25

First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated May 23, 2017, among Superior Industries International, Inc., the subsidiaries of Superior identified therein, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the Lenders party thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed June 20, 2017).

  10.25

  10.26

Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated May 31, 2017, among Superior Industries International, Inc., the subsidiaries of Superior identified therein, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the Lenders party thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed June 20, 2017).

  10.26

  10.27

Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated June 15, 2017, among Superior Industries International, Inc., the subsidiaries of Superior identified therein, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the Lenders party thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed June 20, 2017).

  10.27

  10.28

BridgeFourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated March  22, 2017,June 29, 2018, among Superior Industries International, Inc., the subsidiaries of Superior identified therein, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and the Lenders party thereto.*** (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.410.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed March 24, 2017)June 29, 2018).

  10.28

  10.29

Investor RightsExecutive Employment Agreement, dated as of May  22, 2017, by andMarch 28, 2019, between Superior Industries International, Inc. and TPG Growth III Sidewall, L.P.Majdi B. Abulaban, including forms of award agreements to be granted under the Inducement Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed May  26, 2017) dated April 1, 2019).*

  10.29

  10.30

Separation Agreement,Retention Award Letter, dated June  30, 2017,August 8, 2019, between Matti Masanovich and Superior Industries International, Inc. and Kerry Shiba * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s CurrentRegistrant's Quarterly Report on Form8-K filed June 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017)2019).*

  10.30

  10.31

OfferRetention Award Letter, of Employment, dated April  18, 2017,August 8, 2019, between Joanne Finnorn and Superior Industries International, Inc. and Nadeem Moiz * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed August 4, 2017)., **

  10.31

  10.32

Offer Letter of Employment,Management Board Member Service Contract, dated April  28, 2017September 26, 2019, between Superior Industries International, Inc.Europe AG and Robert Tykal * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed November 13, 2017).

  10.32Offer Letter of Employment, dated July  28, 2017 between Superior Industries International, Inc. and Joanne Finnorn *Andreas Meyer (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed November 13, 2017) for the quarter ended September 30, 2019).*

  10.33

Amendment Agreement, dated October 30, 2019, to the Management Board Member Service Contract, dated September 26, 2019, between Superior Industries Europe AG and Andreas Meyer(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019).*

  10.34

English TranslationOffer Letter of the Domination and Profit Transfer AgreementEmployment, dated September 17, 2019, between Superior Industries International, Germany AGInc. and UNIWHEELS AG,Kevin Burke.*, **

10.35

Superior Industries International, Inc. 2019 Inducement Grant Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated August 8, 2019).*

10.36

Retention Award Letter, dated December 5, 201713, 2019, between Parveen Kakar and Superior Industries International, Inc.* (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 toof the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed December 11, 2017).16, 2019.


*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

**

Filed herewith.

***

Certain schedules and exhibits to this agreement have been omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(2) of RegulationS-K. A copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit will be furnished supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

****

Submitted electronically with the report.

76


SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM10-K

Schedule II

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 AND 20152017

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions

 

      Additions 

 

Balance at

Beginning of

Year

 

 

Charge to

Costs and

Expenses

 

 

Other

 

 

Deductions

From

Reserves

 

 

Balance at

End of Year

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable

 

$

4,298

 

 

$

919

 

 

$

56

 

 

$

(2,406

)

 

$

2,867

 

Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets

 

$

16,576

 

 

$

6,822

 

 

$

 

 

$

(519

)

 

$

22,879

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable

 

$

2,325

 

 

$

2,311

 

 

$

 

 

$

(338

)

 

$

4,298

 

Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets

 

$

7,634

 

 

$

9,036

 

 

$

 

 

$

(94

)

 

$

16,576

 

  Balance
at

Beginning
of

Year
   Charge
to

Costs
and

Expenses
   Other   Deductions
From
Reserves
 Balance
at

End of
Year
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable

  $919   $1,127   $1,162   $(883 $2,325 

 

$

919

 

 

$

1,127

 

 

$

1,162

 

 

$

(883

)

 

$

2,325

 

Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets

  $3,123   $1,005   $3,506    —    $7,634 

 

$

3,123

 

 

$

1,005

 

 

$

3,506

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,634

 

2016

         

Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable

  $867   $403   $—     $(351 $919 

Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets

  $5,891   $698   $—     $(3,466 $3,123 

2015

         

Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable

  $514   $380   $—     $(27 $867 

Valuation allowances for deferred tax assets

  $3,911   $1,980   $—     $—    $5,891 

77


SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM10-K

ITEM 16- FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

78


SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Registrant)

By

/s/ Majdi B. Abulaban

February 28, 2020

SUPERIOR INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Majdi B. Abulaban

(Registrant)

By/s/ Donald J. StebbinsMarch 15, 2018
Donald J. Stebbins

President and Chief Executive Officer and President

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Majdi B. Abulaban and Matti M. Masanovich as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact (with full power to each of them to act alone), with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with the exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection herewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing required and necessary to be done in and about the foregoing as fully for all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the dates indicated.

 

/s/ Majdi B. Abulaban

Majdi B. Abulaban

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

February 28, 2020

/s/ Donald J. Stebbins

Donald J. Stebbins

Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)

March 15, 2018

/s/ Nadeem MoizMatti M. Masanovich

Nadeem Moiz

Matti M. Masanovich

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

March 15, 2018February 28, 2020

/s/ Scot S. BowieMichael J. Hatzfeld Jr.

Scot S. Bowie

Michael J. Hatzfeld Jr.

Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

March 15, 2018February 28, 2020

/s/ Michael R. Bruynesteyn

Michael R. Bruynesteyn

Director

March 15, 2018February 28, 2020

/s/ Jack A. HockemaRichard J. Giromini

Jack A. Hockema

Richard J. Giromini

Director

March 15, 2018February 28, 2020

/s/ Paul J. Humphries

Paul J. Humphries

Director

March 15, 2018February 28, 2020

/s/ Ransom A. Langford

Ransom A. Langford

Director

February 28, 2020

/s/ James S. McElya

James S. McElya

Director

March 15, 2018February 28, 2020

/s/ Timothy C. McQuay

Timothy C. McQuay

Director

March 15, 2018February 28, 2020

/s/ Ellen B. Richstone

Ellen B. Richstone

Director

March 15, 2018February 28, 2020

/s/ Francisco S. Uranga

Francisco S. Uranga

Director

March 15, 2018February 28, 2020

/s/ Ransom A. Langford

Ransom A. Langford

Director

March 15, 2018

 

111

79