Table of Contents
 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 
Form
10-K
 
 
(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 26, 202031, 2022
Or
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
to
Commission File Number:
0-21238
 
 
 
Landstar System, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
 
 
Delaware
 
06-1313069
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
13410 Sutton Park Drive South

Jacksonville, Florida

 
32224
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(904)
398-9400
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of each class
 
Trading
Symbol(s)
 
Name of each exchange
on which registered
Common Stock
 
LSTR
 
NASDAQ
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
 
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    
Yes   ☒
  ☑    No  ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒
No
  ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    
Yes   ☒
  ☑    No  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    
Yes  ☒
  ☑    No  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated
filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer   Accelerated filer 
    
Non-accelerated
filer
   Smaller reporting company 
    
     Emerging growth company 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.  
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to
§240.10D-1(b).  ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2
of the Act).    Yes  ☐    No  
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates
of the registrant was $4,086,370,000$5,340,732,000 (based on the per share closing price on June 27, 2020,25, 2022, the last business day of the Company’s second fiscal quarter, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market). In making this calculation, the registrant has assumed, without admitting for any purpose, that all directors and executive officers of the registrant, and no other persons, are affiliates.
The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), outstanding as of the close of business on January 22, 202127, 2023 was 38,386,768.35,928,383.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the following document are incorporated by reference in this Form
10-K
as indicated herein:
 
Document
  
Part of
10-K
Into Which Incorporated
Proxy Statement relating to Landstar System, Inc.’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on May 12, 202110, 2023
  
Part III
 

Table of Contents
LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC.
2020 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM
10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 


LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC.

2022 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

     
Page
 
  
    

Item 1.

 
Item 1.
   3 

Item 1A.

    1112 

Item 1B.

    1819 

Item 2.

    1819 

Item 3.

    1819 

Item 4.

    1819 
  
    

Item 5.

 
Item 5.
   1920 

Item 6.

    2122 

Item 7.

    2122 

Item 7A.

    3437 

Item 8.

    3539 

Item 9.

    6063 

Item 9A.

    6063 

Item 9B.

    6466 

Item 9C.

 
   
66 

Item 10.

    6567 

Item 11.

    6567 

Item 12.

    6567 

Item 13.

    6567 

Item 14.

    6567 
  
    

Item 15.

 
Item 15.
   6668 

   6971 

EX – 31.1 Section 302 CEO Certification

EX – 31.2 Section 302 CFO Certification

EX – 32.1 Section 906 CEO Certification

EX – 32.2 Section 906 CFO Certification

2


2

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.

Business

Introduction

Landstar System, Inc. was incorporated in January 1991 under the laws of the State of Delaware and has been a publicly held company since its initial public offering in March 1993. The principal executive offices of Landstar System, Inc. (collectively with its subsidiaries and other affiliated companies referred to herein as “Landstar” or the “Company,” unless the context otherwise requires) is located at 13410 Sutton Park Drive South, Jacksonville, Florida 32224 and its telephone number is (904)

398-9400.
The Company makes available free of charge through its website its annual report on Form
10-K,
quarterly reports on Form
10-Q,
current reports on Form
8-K,
proxy statements on Schedule 14A and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company’s website is www.landstar.com. The SEC maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that contains the Company’s current and periodic reports, proxy and information statements and other information filed electronically with the SEC.

Description of Business

Landstar, is a worldwide, technology-enabled, asset-light provider of integrated transportation management solutions.solutions delivering safe, specialized transportation services to a broad range of customers utilizing a network of agents, third party capacity providers and employees. The Company offers services to its customers across multiple transportation modes, with the ability to arrange for individual shipments of freight to comprehensive third party logistics solutions to meet all of a customer’s transportation needs. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and Mexico, and between the United States and Canada, Mexico and other countries around the world. The Company’s services emphasize safety, information coordination and customer service and are delivered through a network of over 1,100 independent commission sales agents and approximately 79,000over 108,000 third party capacity providers, primarily truck capacity providers, linked together by a series of digital technologies which are provided and coordinated by the Company. The nature of the Company’s business is such that a significant portion of its operating costs varies directly with revenue.

Landstar markets its integrated transportation management solutions primarily through independent commission sales agents and exclusively utilizes third party capacity providers to transport customers’ freight. Landstar’s independent commission sales agents enter into contractual arrangements with the Company and are responsible for locating freight, making that freight available to Landstar’s capacity providers and coordinating the transportation of the freight with customers and capacity providers. The Company’s third party capacity providers consist of independent contractors who provide truck capacity to the Company under exclusive lease arrangements (the “BCO Independent Contractors”), unrelated trucking companies who provide truck capacity to the Company under

non-exclusive
contractual arrangements (the “Truck Brokerage Carriers”), air cargo carriers, ocean cargo carriers and railroads. Through this network of agents and capacity providers linked together by Landstar’s seriesecosystem of digital technologies, Landstar operates an integrated transportation management solutions business primarily throughout North America with revenue of $4.1$7.4 billion during the most recently completed fiscal year. The Company reports the results of two operating segments: the transportation logistics segment and the insurance segment.

Transportation Logistics Segment

The transportation logistics segment provides a wide range of integrated transportation management solutions. Transportation services are provided by Landstar’s “Operating Subsidiaries”: Landstar Ranger, Inc., Landstar Inway, Inc., Landstar Ligon, Inc., Landstar Gemini, Inc., Landstar Transportation Logistics, Inc., Landstar Global Logistics, Inc., Landstar Express America, Inc., Landstar Canada, Inc., Landstar Metro, S.A.P.I. de C.V., and as further described below under “

Truck Services
”, Landstar Metro, Landstar Servicios and Landstar Blue.Blue, LLC. Transportation services offered by the Company include truckload, less-than-truckload and less-than-truckloadother truck transportation, rail intermodal, air cargo, ocean cargo, expedited ground and air delivery of time-critical freight, heavy-haul/specialized, U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico cross-border, intra-Mexico, intra-Canada, project cargo and customs brokerage. Examples of the industries serviced by the transportation logistics segment include automotive parts and assemblies, consumer durables, building products, metals, chemicals, foodstuffs, heavy machinery, retail, electronics and military equipment. In addition, the transportation logistics segment provides transportation services to other transportation companies, including third party logistics small package and less-than-truckload service providers. Each of theThe independent commission sales agents has the opportunity to market all of the services provided by the transportation logistics segment. Billings for freight transportation services are typically charged to customers on a per shipment basis for the physical transportation of freight and are referred to as transportation revenue. See “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for the amount of revenue from external customers, measure of profit and total assets attributable to the transportation logistics segment for the last three fiscal years.

3


3

Table of Contents

Truck Services

. The transportation logistics segment’s truck transportation services include a full array of truckload transportation for a wide range of commodities and, to a lesser degree, less-than-truckload and other truck transportation services. A significant portion of the Company’s truckload services is priced in the spot market and delivered over irregular or
non-repetitive
routes, while approximately 32%24% of the Company’s fiscal year 20202022 truck transportation revenue was generated by BCO Independent Contractors utilizing Landstar provided trailing equipment, which frequently is used on more routine, regular routes. The Company utilizes a broad assortment of equipment, including dry and specialty vans of various sizes, unsided/platform trailers (including flatbeds, drop decks and specialty trailers) and temperature-controlled vans. Available truck transportation services also include
short-to-long
haul movement of containers by truck and expedited ground and dedicated power-only truck capacity. During fiscal year 2020,2022, revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors and Truck Brokerage Carriers was 45%35% and 47%54%, respectively, of consolidated revenue. Also, during fiscal year 2020,2022, truck transportation revenue generated via van equipment and unsided/platform trailing equipment was 66%59% and 32%27%, respectively, of truck transportation revenue and less-than-truckload and other truck transportation revenue was 2% and 13%, respectively, of truck transportation revenue. The Company’s truck services contributed 89% of consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2022, 91% of consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2021 and 92% of consolidated revenue in fiscal years 2020 and 2019, respectively, and 93% of consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2018.
2020.

On May 6, 2020, the Company formed a new subsidiary that was subsequently renamed Landstar Blue.Blue, LLC (“Landstar Blue”). Landstar Blue arranges truckload brokerage services while helpingwith a focus on the contract services market. Landstar Blue also helps the Company to develop and test digital technologies and processes for the benefit of all Landstar independent commission sales agents. On June 15, 2020, Landstar Blue completed the acquisition of an independent agent of the Company whose business focused on truckload brokerage services. The results of operations from Landstar Blue are presented as part of the Company’s transportationstransportation logistics segment. Revenue from Landstar Blue represented less thanapproximately 1% of the Company’s transportation logistics segment revenue in fiscal year 2022 and less than 1% in both fiscal years 2021 and 2020.

Rail Intermodal Services.

The transportation logistics segment has contracts with Class 1 domestic and Canadian railroads, certain short-line railroads and most major asset-based intermodal equipment providers, including agreements with stacktrain operators and container and trailing equipment companies. In addition, the transportation logistics segment has contracts with a vast network of local trucking companies that handle
pick-up
and delivery of rail freight. These contracts provide the transportation logistics segment the ability to transport freight via rail throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico. The transportation logistics segment’s rail intermodal service capabilities include trailer on flat car, container on flat car, box car and railcar. The transportation logistics segment’s rail intermodal services contributed 3%2% of consolidated revenue in each ofboth fiscal years 2020, 20192022 and 2018.
2021 and 3% in fiscal year 2020.

Air and Ocean Services.

The transportation logistics segment provides domestic and international air services and ocean services to its customers. The Company executes international air freight transportation as an International Air Transport Association (“IATA”) certified Indirect Air Carrier (“IAC”) and international ocean freight transportation as an Ocean Transportation Intermediary (“OTI”) licensed by the Federal Maritime Commission (“FMC”) as a
non-vessel
operating common carrier (“NVOCC”) and ocean freight forwarder. Through its network of independent commission sales agents, relationships within a global network of foreign transportation intermediaries and contracts with a number of airlines and ocean lines, the
transportation logistics segment provides efficient and cost effective
door-to-door
transportation to most points in the world for a vast array of cargo types such as
over-sized
break bulk, consolidations, full container loads, less-than container loads and refrigerated freight. The transportation logistics segment’s air and ocean services contributed 8% of consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2022, 5% of consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2021 and 3% of consolidated revenue in each of fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018.
year 2020.

Insurance Segment

The insurance segment is comprised of Signature Insurance Company (“Signature”), a wholly owned offshore insurance subsidiary, and Risk Management Claim Services, Inc. (“RMCS”). The insurance segment provides risk and claims management services to certain of Landstar’s Operating Subsidiaries. In addition, it reinsures certain risks of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors and provides certain property and casualty insurance directly to certain of Landstar’s Operating Subsidiaries. Revenue at the insurance segment represents reinsurance premiums from third party insurance companies that provide insurance programs to BCO Independent Contractors where all or a portion of the risk of loss is ultimately borne by Signature. Revenue at the insurance segment represented approximately 1% of the Company’s consolidated revenue in each of fiscal years 2020, 20192022, 2021 and 2018.2020. See “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for the amount of revenue from external customers, measure of profit and total assets attributable to the insurance segment for the last three fiscal years.

4


4

Table of Contents

Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations

Management believes the following factors are particularly significant to the Company’s operations:

Agent Network

The Company’s primary

day-to-day
contact with its customers is through its network of independent commission sales agents and, to a lesser extent, through employees of the Company. The typical Landstar independent commission sales agent maintains a relationship with a number of shippers and services these shippers utilizing the Company’s digital technologies and extensive network of third party capacity that provides various modes of transportation services to the Company. The Company provides assistance to the agents in developing additional relationships with shippers and enhancing agent and Company relationships with larger shippers through the Company’s field employees, located throughout the United States and Canada. The Operating Subsidiaries provide programs to support the agents’ operations and tools and data to assist agents in establishing pricing for freight hauled by the various modes of transportation available to the agents. It is important to note that the Operating Subsidiaries, and not the Company’s agents, contract directly with customers and generally assume the related credit risk and potential liability for freight losses or damages when the Company is providing transportation services as a motor carrier.

Management believes the Company has more independent commission sales agents than any other asset-light integrated transportation management solutions company in the United States. Landstar’s vast network of independent commission sales agent locations provides the Company regular contact with shippers at the local level and the capability to be highly responsive to shippers’ changing needs. The Company’s large network of available capacity provides independent commission sales agents with the resources needed to service both large and small shippers. Through its agent network, the Company offers smaller shippers a level of service comparable to that typically enjoyed only by larger customers. Examples include the ability to provide transportation services on short notice, multiple

pick-up
and delivery points, automated information flow, access to specialized equipment, spotted van trailers and
drop-and-hook
operations. While the majority of the agents in the Company’s network arrange truck transportation services for shippers, a number of the Company’s agents specialize in certain types of freight and transportation services (such as oversized or heavy loads and/or rail, air and international freight transportation). Each independent commission sales agent has the opportunity to market all of the services provided by the transportation logistics segment.

The independent commission sales agents use a variety of digital technologies provided by the Company to service the requirements of shippers. For truckload services, the Company’s independent commission sales agents primarily use Landstar proprietary software which enables agents to enter available freight, dispatch capacity and process most administrative procedurestasks and then communicate that information to Landstar and its capacity providers via the internet.through either web-based or mobile tools. The Company’s

web-based
available truck information system provides a listing of available truck capacity to the Company’s independent commission sales agents. The Company also offers independent commission sales agents a variety of proprietary pricing, operational and financial tools via web or mobile applications. For modes of transportation other than truckload, the independent commission sales agents utilize both proprietary and third party information technology applications provided by the Company.

Commissions to agents are based on contractually agreed-upon percentages of (i) revenue, or net revenue, defined as(ii) revenue less the cost of purchased transportation, or net(iii) revenue less a contractually agreed upon percentage of revenue retained by Landstar.Landstar and the cost of purchased transportation (the “retention contracts”). Commissions to agents as a percentage of consolidated revenue will vary directly with fluctuations in the percentage of consolidated revenue generated by the various modes of transportation and reinsurance premiums and, in general, vary inversely with changes in net revenue margin, definedthe amount of purchased transportation as net revenue divided bya percentage of revenue on services provided by Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads, air cargo carriers and ocean cargo carriers. Commissions to agents are recognized over the freight transit period as the performance obligation to the customer is completed.

The Company had 508625 and 555593 agents whothat each generated at least $1 million in Landstar revenue (the “Million Dollar Agents”) during fiscal years 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively. Landstar revenue from the Million Dollar Agents in the aggregate represented 92%97% and 93%94% of consolidated revenue in 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively. Included among the Company’s Million Dollar Agents, the Company had 133 independent sales agencies that generated at least $10 million in Landstar revenue during the 2022 fiscal year, which in aggregate comprised approximately 74% of Landstar’s consolidated revenue. Management believes that the majority of the Million Dollar Agents choose to represent the Company exclusively.

Historically, the Company has experienced very few terminations of its Million Dollar Agents, whether such terminations are initiated by the agent or the Company. Annual terminations of Million Dollar Agents have typically been less than 3% of the total number of Million Dollar Agents. In fiscal year 2020, the change in the number of Million Dollar Agents was entirely attributable to agents generating under $5 million of Landstar revenue per year, as the Company experienced no change in fiscal year 2020 compared to fiscal year 2019 in the number of independent sales agents generating $5 million or more of Landstar revenue.

5


5

Table of Contents
During fiscal year 2020, the
COVID-19
pandemic impacted the number of agents generating under $5 million of Landstar revenue both with respect to existing agents, some of whom had difficulty operating their small businesses during the pandemic due to personal issues, staffing issues and/or customer issues, and with respect to the Company’s ability to recruit new independent sales agents to the Landstar network, given the uncertain operating environment and challenges we experienced in building personal relationships with prospective agent candidates during the pandemic.

Third Party Capacity

The Company relies exclusively on independent third parties for its hauling capacity other than for trailing equipment owned or leased by the Company and utilized primarily by the BCO Independent Contractors. These third party transportation capacity providers consist of BCO Independent Contractors, Truck Brokerage Carriers, air and ocean cargo carriers and railroads. Landstar’s use of capacity provided by third parties allows it to maintain a lower level of capital investment, resulting in lower fixed costs. During fiscal year 2020,2022, revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors, Truck Brokerage Carriers and railroads represented approximately 45%35%, 47%54% and 3%2%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated revenue. Collectively, revenue generated by air and ocean cargo carriers represented approximately 3%8% of the Company’s consolidated revenue during fiscal year 2020.2022. Historically, the gross profitvariable contribution margin (defined as gross profit,variable contribution, which is defined as revenue less the costvariable costs of purchased transportation and commissions to agents,revenue, divided by revenue) generated from freight hauled by BCO Independent Contractors has been greater than that from freight hauled by other third party capacity providers. However, the Company’s insurance and claims costs, depreciation costs and other operating costs are incurred primarily in support of BCO Independent Contractor capacity. In addition, as further described in the “Corporate Services” section that follows, the Company incurs significantly higher selling, general and administrative costs in support of BCO Independent Contractor capacity as compared to the other modes of transportation. Purchased transportation costs are recognized over the freight transit period as the performance obligation to the customer is completed.

BCO Independent Contractors.

Management believes the Company has the largest fleet of truckload BCO Independent Contractors in the United States. BCO Independent Contractors provide truck capacity to the Company under exclusive lease arrangements. Each BCO Independent Contractor operates under the motor carrier operating authority issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”) to Landstar’s Operating Subsidiary to which such BCO Independent Contractor provides services and has leased his or her equipment. The Company’s network of BCO Independent Contractors provides marketing, operating, safety, recruiting and retention advantages to the Company.

The Company’s BCO Independent Contractors are compensated primarily based on a contractually agreed-upon percentage of revenue generated by loads they haul. This percentage generally ranges from 62% to 70% where the BCO Independent Contractor provides only a tractor and 73% to 76% where the BCO Independent Contractor provides both a tractor and trailing equipment. The BCO Independent Contractor must pay substantially all of the expenses of operating his/her equipment, including driver wages and benefits, fuel, physical damage insurance, maintenance, highway use taxes and debt service, if applicable. The Company passes 100% of fuel surcharges billed to customers for freight hauled by BCO Independent Contractors to its BCO Independent Contractors. During fiscal year 2020,2022, the Company billed customers $168.8$445 million in fuel surcharges and passed 100% of such fuel surcharges to the BCO Independent Contractors. These fuel surcharges are excluded from revenue and the cost of purchased transportation.

The Company maintains an ecosystem of digital technologies and applications through which BCO Independent Contractors can view a comprehensive listing of the Company’s available freight, allowing them to consider rate, size, origin and destination when planning trips. The Company’s digital applications also provideLandstarOne mobile application provides BCO Independent Contractors information on loading opportunities as well as fueling station locations, retail fuel prices, fuel prices net of Landstar-arranged discounts and applicable state fuel tax credits, and equipment inspection site locations. The Landstar Contractors’ Advantage Purchasing Program (“LCAPP”) leverages Landstar’s purchasing power to provide discounts to eligible BCO Independent Contractors when they purchase equipment, fuel, tires and other items. In addition, Landstar Contractor Financing, Inc. provides a source of funds at competitive interest rates to the BCO Independent Contractors to purchase trailing equipment.

The number of trucks provided to the Company by BCO Independent Contractors was 10,99111,281 at December 26, 2020,31, 2022, compared to 10,24311,864 at December 28, 2019.25, 2021. At December 26, 2020,31, 2022, approximately 97% of the trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors were provided by BCO Independent Contractors who provided five or fewer trucks to the Company. The number of trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors fluctuates daily as a result of truck recruiting and truck terminations. MoreLess trucks were recruited in fiscal year 20202022 than in fiscal year 20192021 and trucks terminated were lowerhigher in fiscal year 20202022 than in fiscal year 2019,2021, resulting in an overall net increasedecrease of 748583 trucks during fiscal year 2020.2022. Landstar’s BCO Independent Contractor truck

6

Table of Contents
turnover was approximately 27%29% in fiscal year 2020,2022, compared to 36%21% in fiscal year 2019.2021. Approximately 38%32% of 20202022 turnover was attributable to BCO Independent Contractors who had been with the Company for less than one year. Management believes the factors that have historically favorably impacted turnover include the Company’s extensive agent network, the quantity and quality of available freight, the proprietary technology-based tools the Company makes available to BCO Independent Contractors

6


to empower them to manage their businesses, the Company’s programs to reduce the operating costs of its BCO Independent Contractors and Landstar’s reputation for quality, service, reliability and financial strength.

Decreasing revenue per load on a sequential basis historically has had an unfavorable impact on BCO Independent Contractor turnover. During fiscal year 2022, revenue per load reached its all-time high during the Company’s 2022 first quarter and sequentially decreased throughout the second, third and fourth fiscal quarters.

In October 2020, the Company announced a new initiative in further support of its network of BCO Independent Contractors. This initiative involved the establishment of multiple field operations centers located in the United States and Canada to further support the Company’s ongoing efforts in recruiting and retaining BCO Independent Contractors. In connection with this initiative, the Company recorded commission program termination costs of $15,494,000 related to buyouts of certain incentive commission arrangements with several of its independent sales agents due to the Company’s discontinuation of a truck owner-operator recruitment and retention program formerly involving those agents.

Truck Brokerage Carriers.

At December 26, 2020,31, 2022, the Company maintained a database of over 69,00097,000 approved Truck Brokerage Carriers who provide truck capacity to the Company. Truck Brokerage Carriers provide truck capacity to the Company under
non-exclusive
contractual arrangements and each operates under its own
DOT-issued
motor carrier operating authority. Truck Brokerage Carriers are paid either a negotiated rate for each load hauled or, to a lesser extent, a contractually agreed-upon fixed rate per load. The Company recruits, approves, establishes contracts with and tracks safety ratings and service records of these third party trucking companies. In addition to providing additional capacity to the Company, the use of Truck Brokerage Carriers enables the Company to pursue different types and quality of freight such as short-haul traffic, less-than-truckload and, in certain instances, lower-priced freight that generally would not be handled by the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors.

The Company maintains an ecosystem of digital technologies and applications through which Truck Brokerage Carriers can view a listing of the Company’s freight that is available to them. The Landstar Savings Plus Program leverages Landstar’s purchasing power to provide discounts to eligible Truck Brokerage Carriers when they purchase fuel and equipment and provides the Truck Brokerage Carriers with an electronic payment option.

Railroads and Air and Ocean Cargo Carriers.

The Company has contracts with Class 1 domestic and Canadian railroads, certain short-line railroads and domestic and international airlines and ocean lines. These relationships allow the Company to pursue the freight best serviced by these forms of transportation capacity. Railroads and ocean cargo carriers are paid either a negotiated rate for each load hauled or a contractually agreed-upon fixed rate per load. Air cargo carriers are generally paid a negotiated rate for each load hauled. Ocean cargo carriers are generally paid contractually agreed-upon fixed rates per load. The Company also contracts with other third party capacity providers, such as air charter service providers, when required by specific customer needs.

Trailing Equipment

The Company offers its customers a large and diverse fleet of trailing equipment. The following table illustrates the mix of the trailing equipment as of December 26, 2020,31, 2022, either provided by the BCO Independent Contractors or owned or leased by the Company and made available primarily to BCO Independent Contractors. The Company also provides power-only services, as reported in other truck transportation revenue, utilizing trailing equipment generally provided by the shipper or other third party. In general, Truck Brokerage Carriers utilize their own trailing equipment when providing transportation services on behalf of Landstar. Power-only and Truck Brokerage Carrier trailing equipment is not included in the following table:

Trailers by Type

    

Van

   13,82215,564 

Unsided/platform, including flatbeds, step decks, drop decks and low boys

   3,0672,834 

Temperature-controlled

   172195 
  

 

Total

   17,06118,593 
  

 

Specialized services offered by the Company include those provided by a large fleet of flatbed trailers and multi-axle trailers capable of hauling extremely heavy or oversized loads. Management believes the Company, along with its network of capacity providers, offers one of the largest fleets of heavy/specialized trailing equipment in North America.

At December 26, 2020, 12,83131, 2022, 14,704 of the trailers available to the BCO Independent Contractors were owned by the Company and 206241 were rented. In addition, at December 26, 2020, 4,02431, 2022, 3,648 trailers were provided by the BCO Independent Contractors. Approximately 32%24% of Landstar’s truck transportation revenue was generated on Landstar providedLandstar-provided trailing equipment during fiscal year 2020.2022.

7


7

Table of Contents

Customers

The Company’s customer base is highly diversified and dispersed across many industries, commodities and geographic regions. The Company’s top 100 customers accounted for approximately 46%44% and 42%46%, respectively, of consolidated revenue during fiscal years 20202022 and 2019.2021. Management believes that the Company’s overall size, ecosystem of digital technologies and applications, geographic coverage, access to equipment and diverse service capability offer the Company significant competitive marketing and operating advantages. These advantages allow the Company to meet the needs of even the largest shippers. Larger shippers often consider reducing the number of authorized carriers they use in favor of a small number of “core carriers,” such as the Company, whose size and diverse service capabilities enable these core carriers to satisfy most of the shippers’ transportation needs. The Company’s national account customers include the United States Department of Defense and many of the companies included in the Fortune 500. Large shippers also use third party logistics providers (“3PLs”) to outsource the management and coordination of their transportation needs. 3PLs and other transportation companies also utilize the Company’s available transportation capacity to satisfy their obligations to their shippers. There were 1214 transportation service providers, including 3PLs, included in the Company’s top 25 customers for fiscal year 2020.2022. Management believes the Company’s network of agents and third party capacity providers allows it to efficiently attract and service smaller shippers which may not be as desirable to other large transportation providers (see above under “Agent Network”). No customer accounted for more than 4%3% of the Company’s 20202022 revenue.

Technology

Management believes leadership in the development, operation and support of an ecosystem of digital technologies and applications is an ongoing part of providing high quality service.

Landstar focuses on providing integrated transportation management solutions which emphasize customer service and information coordination among its independent commission sales agents, customers, capacity providers and employees. The Company continues to focus on identifying, purchasing or developing and implementing software applications and tools which are designed to: (i) assist Landstar independent commission sales agents in efficiently sourcing capacity, pricing transportation services and managing and analyzing the performance of thetheir independent businesses, (ii) assist customers in meeting their transportation needs, (iii) assist third party capacity providers in identifying desirable freight opportunities and operating their independent businesses, and (iv) improve operational and administrative efficiency throughout the Company. Landstar intends to continue to improve its technologies to meet the total needs of its agents, customers and third party capacity providers and remains engaged in various multi-year projects aimed at increasing efficiencies, primarily through technology, at Landstar and across our agent and third party capacity network.

Management believes leadership in the development, operation and support of an ecosystem of digital technologies and applications is an ongoing part of providing high quality service. The Company has engaged in a multi-year effort to implement a comprehensive strategy focused on the long-term development of leading edge digital tools to empower participants in our network to succeed in the technology-driven transportation logistics marketplace. As part of the execution of this strategy, the Company has launched the following tools to participants within our network:

Agent TMS: A cloud-based platform for truckload freight agent workflow.

Analytics: A suite of business intelligence applications powered by Microsoft Power BI for independent sales agents and BCO Independent Contractors to access information and identify trends in their businesses.

Pricing: Landstar-proprietary pricing tools developed with data scientists using historical Company information and third party pricing data to provide independent commission sales agents with near real time market data.

LandstarOne: Mobile application available to BCO Independent Contractors and third party motor carriers providing a one-stop location for available loading opportunities as well as fueling station locations, retail fuel prices, fuel prices net of Landstar-arranged discounts and applicable state fuel tax credits, and equipment inspection site locations.

Clarity: Landstar’s proprietary freight tracking exception management tool that incorporates geo-positional data from, among other sources, electronic logging devices, trailer tracking devices and third party data aggregators.

Trailer Tools: Applications empowering independent commission sales agents through the automation of the Company’s trailer request and trailer pool management processes.

Credit: Application that automates the credit request process for independent commission sales agents.

Since the launch of this initiative in 2016, the Company has invested approximately $123 million in this strategic development effort, including approximately $33 million and $27 million, respectively, in fiscal years 2022 and 2021.

8


The Company’s information technology systems used in connection with its operations are located in Jacksonville, Florida and, to a lesser extent, in Rockford, Illinois. In addition, the Company utilizes several third party data centers throughout the U.S. Landstar relies, in the regular course of its business, on the proper operation of its information technology systems.

Corporate Services

The Company provides many administrative support services to its network of independent commission sales agents, third party capacity providers and customers. Management believes that the mobile and digital applications purchased or developed and maintained by the Company and its administrative support services provide operational and financial advantages to its independent commission sales agents, third party capacity providers and customers. These, in turn, enhance the operational and financial efficiency of all aspects of the network.

Administrative support services that provide operational and financial advantages to the network include customer contract administration, customer credit review and approvals, pricing, customer billing, accounts receivable collections, third party capacity settlement, operator and equipment safety and compliance management for our network of BCO Independent Contractors, insurance claims handling, coordination of vendor discount programs and third party capacity sourcing programs. Marketing and advertising strategies are also provided by the Company. The Company’s practices of accepting customer credit risk and paying its agents and carriers promptly provides a significant competitive advantage to the Company in comparison to less capitalized competitors.

Competition

Landstar competes primarily in the transportation and logistics services industry with truckload carriers, third party logistics companies, digital freight brokers, intermodal transportation and logistics service providers, railroads, less-than-truckload carriers and other asset-light transportation and logistics service providers. The transportation and logistics services industry is extremely competitive and fragmented.

8

Table of Contents

Management believes that competition for freight transported by the Company is based on service, efficiency and freight rates, which are influenced significantly by the economic environment, particularly the amount of available transportation capacity and freight demand. Management believes that Landstar’s overall size, service offerings and availability of a wide range of equipment, together with its geographically dispersed local independent agent network, present the Company with significant competitive advantages over many transportation and logistics service providers.

Self-Insured Claims

Potential liability associated with accidents in the trucking industry is severe and occurrences are unpredictable. For periods prior to May 1, 2019, Landstar retains liability for commercial trucking claims up to $5,000,000$5 million per occurrence and maintains various third party insurance arrangements for liabilities in excess of its $5,000,000$5 million self-insured retention. Effective May 1, 2019, the Company entered into a new three year commercial auto liability insurance arrangement for losses incurred between $5,000,000$5 million and $10,000,000$10 million (the “Initial Excess Policy”) with a third party insurance company. The Company subsequently extended the Initial Excess Policy for one additional policy year, from May 1, 2022 through April 30, 2023. For commercial trucking claims incurred on or after May 1, 20192022 through April 30, 2022,2023, the extended Initial Excess Policy provides for a limit for a single loss of $5,000,000,$5 million, with ana remaining aggregate limit of $15,000,000$10 million for eachthe policy year, an aggregate limit of $20,000,000 for the

thirty-six
month term endedperiod ending April 30, 2022,2023, and optionsan option to increase such aggregate limitslimit for
a pre-established
amounts amount of additional premium. If aggregate losses under the Initial Excess Policy exceed either the annual aggregate limit or the aggregate limit for the three year period ending April 30, 2022,2023, and the Company did not elect to increase such aggregate limitslimit for a
pre-established
amount of additional premium, Landstarthe Company would retain liability of up to $10,000,000$10 million per occurrence, inclusive of its $5,000,000$5 million self-insured retention for commercial trucking claims during the remainder of the applicable policy year(s). Moreover, as a result of the Company’s aggregate loss experience since it entered into the Initial Excess Policy, the Initial Excess Policy required the Company to pay additional premium up to a
pre-established
maximum amount of $3,500,000, which was provided for in insurance and claims costs for the Company’s 2020 fiscal first quarter.
period ending April 30, 2023.

The Company also maintains third party insurance arrangements providing excess coverage for commercial trucking liabilities in excess of $10,000,000.$10 million. These third party arrangements provide coverage on a per occurrence or aggregated basis. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the occurrence of trials in courts throughout the United States involving catastrophic injury and fatality claims against commercial motor carriers that have resulted in verdicts in excess of $10 million. Within the transportation logistics industry, these verdicts are often referred to as “Nuclear Verdicts.” The increase in Nuclear Verdicts has had a significant impact on the cost of commercial auto liability claims throughout the United States. Due to the increasing cost of commercial auto liability claims, throughout the United States in recent years, the availability of such excess coverage has significantly decreased, and the pricing associated with such excess coverage, to the extent available, has significantly increased. Effective May 1, 2020Over the most recent three-year period, with respect to

9


the annual policy year ending April 30, 2021,2023, as compared to the annual policy year ended April 30, 2020, the Company experienced an increase of approximately $14$20 million, or over 170%360%, in the premiums charged by third party insurance companies to the Company for excess coverage for commercial trucking liabilities in excess of $10,000,000.$10 million.

Moreover, in recent years the Company has increased the level of its financial exposure to commercial trucking claims in excess of $10 million, including through the use of additional self-insurance, deductibles, aggregate loss limits, quota shares and other arrangements with third party insurance companies, based on the availability of coverage within certain excess insurance coverage layers and estimated cost differentials between proposed premiums from third party insurance companies and historical and actuarially projected losses experienced by the Company at various levels of excess insurance coverage. For example, with respect to a hypothetical claim in the amount of $35 million incurred during the annual policy year ending April 30, 2023, the Company would have an aggregate financial exposure of approximately $10 million. Furthermore, the Company’s third party insurance arrangements provide excess coverage up to an uppermost coverage layer, in excess of which the Company retains additional financial exposure. No assurances can be given that the availability of excess coverage for commercial trucking claims will not continue to deteriorate, that the pricing associated with such excess coverage, to the extent available, will not continue to increase, nor that insurance coverage from third party insurers for excess coverage of commercial trucking claims will even be available on commercially reasonable terms at certain levels.

Moreover, the occurrence of a Nuclear Verdict, or the settlement of a catastrophic injury and/or fatality claim that could have otherwise resulted in a Nuclear Verdict, could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s cost of insurance and claims and its results of operations.

Further, the Company retains liability of up to $1,000,000 for each general liability claim, up to $250,000 for each workers’ compensation claim and up to $250,000 for each cargo claim. In addition, under reinsurance arrangements by Signature of certain risks of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors, the Company retains liability of up to $500,000, $1,000,000 or $2,000,000 with respect to certain occupational accident claims and up to $750,000 with respect to certain workers’ compensation claims. The Company’s exposure to liability associated with accidents incurred by Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads and air and ocean cargo carriers who transport freight on behalf of the Company is reduced by various factors including the extent to which such carriers maintain their own insurance coverage. A material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, cargo claims or workers’ compensation claims or the material unfavorable development of existing claims could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s cost of insurance and claims and its results of operations.

Regulation

Certain of the Operating Subsidiaries are considered motor carriers and/or brokers authorized to arrange for transportation services by motor carriers which are regulated by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (the “FMCSA”) and by various state agencies. The FMCSA has broad regulatory powers with respect to activities such as motor carrier operations, practices, periodic financial reporting and insurance. Subject to federal and state regulatory authorities or regulation, the Company’s capacity providers may transport most types of freight to and from any point in the United States over any route selected.

9

Table of Contents

Interstate motor carrier operations are subject to safety requirements prescribed by the FMCSA. Each truck operator, whether working as a BCO Independent Contractor or for a Truck Brokerage Carrier, is required to have a commercial driver’s license and may be subject to mandatory drug and alcohol testing. The FMCSA’s commercial driver’s license and drug and alcohol testing requirements have not adversely affected the Company’s ability to source the capacity necessary to meet its customers’ transportation needs. However, on January 6, 2020 the FMCSA implemented new requirements applicable to drug and alcohol testing by motor carriers. The new regulation expands motor carrier reporting requirements to include reporting of all operators who test positive and/or refuse to submit to a test as prescribed in the regulation. The new regulation also expands rules relating to the obligation of motor carriers to conduct queries to check if current or prospective operators are prohibited from operating a commercial motor vehicle due to a positive or unresolved drug or alcohol test. The expanded reporting of positive results, or of an operator’s refusal to meet FMCSA testing requirements, to a centralized clearinghouse prescribed by FMCSA has the potential to remove operators from service that may otherwise have been undetected or unreported.

In addition, FMCSA mandated the use of electronic logging devices (“ELDs”) in certain
over-the-road
commercial motor vehicles effective December 18, 2017. The FMCSA’s ELD mandate has not adversely affected the size of the Company’s fleet of BCO Independent Contractors or its ability to source truck capacity provided by Truck Brokerage Carriers.

Additionally, certain of the Operating Subsidiaries are licensed as Ocean Transportation Intermediaries by the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission as

non-vessel-operating
common carriers and/or as ocean freight forwarders. The Company’s air transportation activities in the United States are subject to regulation by the U.S. Department of Transportation as an indirect air carrier. One of the Operating Subsidiaries is licensed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through the Bureau of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“U.S. Customs”) as a customs broker. The Company is also subject to regulations and requirements relating to safety and security promulgated by, among others, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through U.S. Customs and the Transportation Security Administration, the Canada Border Services Agency and various state and local agencies and port authorities. In addition, because the U.S. government is one of the Company’s customers, the Company must comply with and is affected by laws and regulations relating to doing business with the federal government.

The transportation industry is subject to other potential regulatory and legislative changes (such as the possibility of more stringent environmental, climate change and/or safety/security regulations, limits on vehicle weight and size and regulations relating to the health and wellness of commercial truck operators) that may affect the economics of the industry by requiring changes in operating practices, by changing the demand for motor carrier services or the cost of providing truckload or other transportation or logistics services, or by adversely impacting the number of available commercial truck operators.

10


For a discussion of the risks associated with these laws and regulations, see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”

Seasonality

Landstar’s operations are subject to seasonal trends common to the trucking industry. Truckload volumes for the quarter ending in March are typically lower than for the quarters ending in June, September and December.

Human Capital Resources

We believe our employees are among our most important resources and are critical to our continued success. We focus significant attention on attracting and retaining talented and experienced individuals to manage and support our operations. To attract and retain top talent in our highly competitive industry, we have designed our compensation and benefits programs to provide a balanced and effective reward structure. Our short and long-term incentive programs are aligned with key business objectives and are intended to motivate strong performance. Our employees are eligible for medical, dental and vision insurance, a 401(k) savings/retirement plan, flexible

time-off,
employer-provided life and disability insurance, our wellness program, our tuition reimbursement program, and an array of voluntary benefits designed to meet individual needs. We engage firms nationally recognized in the benefits area to objectively evaluate our programs and benchmark them against peers and other similarly situated organizations.

Landstar seeks to compensate employees in a manner that is fair, consistent, and reflective of the external market and provides recognition for the achievement of individual goals, corporate objectives, and professional competencies while maintaining fiscal responsibility. To help us achieve this goal, in 2021, Landstar completed a review of employee compensation that included the establishment of new pay grades and applicable salary ranges for all exempt positions. This review followed a similar review of employee compensation for all information technology positions completed in 2020 and a review of all non-exempt positions completed in 2019. Based on applicable pay grades, salary ranges and market data, Landstar completed an annual salary review for all positions in 2022 in conjunction with its annual review and salary adjustment process.

As of December 26, 2020,31, 2022, the Company and its subsidiaries employed 1,3201,449 individuals. Three Landstar Ranger drivers (out of a Company total of approximately 10,99111,281 drivers for BCO Independent Contractors) are members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. The turnover rate for Landstar employees located in the United States and Canada was 17% in 2022, 13% in 2021 and 9% in 2020. The Company considers relations with its employees to be good.

10

Table of Contents

The Company has identified the following employee-focused goals:

Create and maintain an environment in which continuous improvement is encouraged and expected by everyone within the organization;

Engage each Landstar employee in the Company’s vision to inspire and empower entrepreneurs to succeed in the highly competitive, technology driven freight transportation industry; and

Ensure that all Landstar employees fully understand the requirements of their job and the role their job plays within Landstar.

Landstar formally monitors employee satisfaction and engagement through periodic employee satisfaction and engagement surveys. The Company also uses employee roundtable and focus group discussions as well as exit interviews to monitor engagement and satisfaction.

Landstar also provides comprehensive professional development opportunities to employees at all levels. VariousLandstar’s training and development department offers all employees the opportunity to participate in various learning tracks includeon topics including Leadership, Workplace Safety & Security, Customer Service and other core skills. Courses offered by the training and development department are delivered by Landstar’s team of Association for Talent Development (ATD) certified trainers through both

on-line
and classroom settings.

11


At our core, Landstar is about providing opportunity to people regardless of background. We do not tolerate racism or discriminatory behavior and strongly believe thatin diversity and inclusion make us stronger as a company.inclusion. The Company reaffirms its commitment to equal employment opportunity for all people. The Company complies with all applicable federal and state laws pertaining to equal employment opportunity and affirmative action. It is our philosophy to treat our employees and applicants fairly without regard to race, color, sex, religion, national origin, disability, present, past, or future service in a branch of the uniformed services of the United States, citizenship, sexual orientation or gender identity. Our management teams and all of our employees are expected to exhibit and promote honest, ethical and respectful conduct in the workplace. All of our employees must adhere to a code of ethics and employee compliance code that set standards for appropriate behavior and includes required annual training.

During 2020, amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, we shifted the vast majority of our employees to a remote work environment and implemented a number of other measures to address the safety and health of our employees, BCO Independent Contractors, and independent commission sales agents amidstagents. In 2022, as the

immediate threat related to the COVID-19
pandemic we implementedsubsided in the following, among other steps:
Shifting the vast majorityUnited States, many of our employees began to a remote work environment;
Initiating regular communicationreturn to employees regarding impactsour offices and resume in-person meetings. As of the
COVID-19
pandemic, including health and safety protocols and procedures end of 2022, however, a significant majority of the Company’s employees continued to address actual and suspected
COVID-19
cases and potential exposure of our employees;
Establishing physical distancing procedures and providing personal protective equipment and cleaning supplies for employees who need to be
on-site;
Increasing cleaning protocols at our offices;
Modifying work spaces with plexiglass dividers, rearranged office layouts and touchless faucets;
Expanding the use of virtual interactions in all aspects of our business;
Cancelling the annual agent convention, BCO
All-Star
Celebration and various other events;
Institutingremotely or on a pandemic relief program whereby Landstar paid an extra $50 for each load delivered by a BCO Independent Contractor with a confirmed delivery date from April 1, 2020 through May 30, 2020 to both the BCO Independent Contractor hauling the load and the independent sales agent dispatching the load;
Providing up to $2,000 to a BCO Independent Contractor who tests positive for
COVID-19
or is placed under a mandatory quarantine by a public health authority;
Providing paid
time-off
for employees directly impacted by
COVID-19,
and instructing those who are infected to stay home; and
Prohibiting
non-essential
business travel for all employees.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
hybrid basis.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Operational Risks

Increased severity or frequency of accidents and other claims or a material unfavorable development of existing claims.

As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Self-Insured Claims,” potential liability associated with accidents in the trucking industry is severe and occurrences are unpredictable. For periods prior to May 1, 2019, Landstar retains liability for commercial trucking claims up to $5,000,000$5 million per occurrence and maintains various third party
11

Table of Contents
insurance arrangements for liabilities in excess of its $5,000,000$5 million self-insured retention. Effective May 1, 2019, the Company entered into a new three year commercial auto liability insurance arrangement for losses incurred between $5,000,000$5 million and $10,000,000$10 million (the “Initial Excess Policy”) with a third party insurance company. The Company subsequently extended the Initial Excess Policy for one additional policy year, from May 1, 2022 through April 30, 2023. For commercial trucking claims incurred on or after May 1, 20192022 through April 30, 2022,2023, the extended Initial Excess Policy provides for a limit for a single loss of $5,000,000,$5 million, with ana remaining aggregate limit of $15,000,000$10 million for eachthe policy year, an aggregate limit of $20,000,000 for the
thirty-six
month term endedperiod ending April 30, 2022,2023, and optionsan option to increase such aggregate limitslimit for
a pre-established
amounts amount of additional premium. If aggregate losses under the Initial Excess Policy exceed either the annual aggregate limit or the aggregate limit for the three year period ending April 30, 2022,2023, and the Company did not elect to increase such aggregate limitslimit for a
pre-established
amount of additional premium, Landstarthe Company would retain liability of up to $10,000,000$10 million per occurrence, inclusive of its $5,000,000$5 million self-insured retention for commercial trucking claims during the remainder of the applicable policy year(s).
period ending April 30, 2023.

The Company also maintains third party insurance arrangements providing excess coverage for commercial trucking liabilities in excess of $10,000,000.$10 million. These third party arrangements provide coverage on a per occurrence or aggregated basis. Landstar retains liability forIn recent years, there has been a significant increase in the occurrence of trials in courts throughout the United States involving catastrophic injury and fatality claims against commercial trucking claimsmotor carriers that have resulted in verdicts in excess of our coverage limits under$10 million. Within the transportation logistics industry, these third party insurance arrangements.verdicts are often referred to as “Nuclear Verdicts.” The increase in Nuclear Verdicts has had a significant impact on the cost of commercial auto liability claims throughout the United States. Due to the increasing cost of commercial auto liability claims, throughout the United States in recent years, the availability of such excess coverage has significantly decreased, and the pricing associated with such excess coverage, to the extent available, has significantly increased. Effective May 1, 2020Over the most recent three-year period, with respect to the annual policy year ending April 30, 2021,2023, as compared to the annual policy year ended April 30, 2020, the Company experienced an increase of approximately $14$20 million, or over 170%360%, in the premiums charged by third party insurance companies to the Company for excess coverage for commercial trucking liabilities in excess of $10,000,000.$10 million.

Moreover, in recent years the Company has increased the level of its financial exposure to commercial trucking claims in excess of $10 million, including through the use of additional self-insurance, deductibles, aggregate loss limits, quota shares and other arrangements with third party insurance companies, based on the availability of coverage within certain excess insurance coverage layers and estimated cost differentials between proposed premiums from third party insurance companies and historical and actuarially projected losses experienced by the Company at various levels of excess insurance coverage. For example, with respect to a hypothetical claim in the amount of $35 million incurred during the annual policy year ending April 30, 2023, the Company would have an aggregate financial exposure of approximately $10 million. Furthermore, the Company’s third party insurance arrangements provide excess coverage up to an uppermost coverage layer, in excess of which the Company retains additional financial exposure. No assurances can be given that the availability of excess coverage for commercial trucking claims will not continue to deteriorate, that the pricing associated with such excess coverage, to the extent available, will not continue to increase, nor that insurance coverage from third party insurers for excess coverage of commercial trucking claims will even be available on commercially reasonable terms at certain levels. If anyMoreover, the occurrence of a Nuclear Verdict, or the settlement of a catastrophic injury and/or fatality claim occurrence were to exceed our excess coverage limits under our third party insurance arrangements, such claimthat could have otherwise resulted in a Nuclear Verdict, could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s financial conditioncost of insurance and claims and its results of operations.

12


Further, the Company retains liability of up to $1,000,000 for each general liability claim, up to $250,000 for each workers’ compensation claim and up to $250,000 for each cargo claim. In addition, under reinsurance arrangements by Signature of certain risks of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors, the Company retains liability of up to $500,000, $1,000,000 or $2,000,000 with respect to certain occupational accident claims and up to $750,000 with respect to certain workers’ compensation claims. The Company’s exposure to liability associated with accidents incurred by Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads and air and ocean cargo carriers who transport freight on behalf of the Company is reduced by various factors including the extent to which such carriers maintain their own insurance coverage. A material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, cargo claims or workers’ compensation claims or the material unfavorable development of existing claims could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s cost of insurance and claims and its results of operations.

Dependence on third party insurance companies.

The Company is dependent on a limited number of third party insurance companies to provide insurance coverage in excess of its self-insured retention amounts. Historically, the Company has maintained insurance coverage for commercial trucking claims in excess of its self-insured retention, up to various maximum amounts, with a limited number of third party insurance companies. In an attempt to manage the cost of insurance and claims, the Company has historically increased or decreased the level of its financial exposure to commercial trucking claims by increasing or decreasing its level of self-insured retention based on the estimated cost differential between proposed premiums from third party insurance companies and historical and actuarially projected losses experienced by the Company at various levels of self-insured retention. Similarly, in its excess insurance layers, the Company may increase or decrease the level of its financial exposure to commercial trucking claims, including through the use of additional self-insurance as well as deductibles, aggregate loss limits, quota shares and other arrangements with third party insurance companies, based on the estimated cost differential between proposed premiums from third party insurance companies and historical and actuarially projected losses experienced by the Company at various levels of excess insurance coverage. To the extent that the third party insurance companies propose increases to their premiums for coverage of commercial trucking claims, the Company may decide to pay such increased premiums or increase its financial exposure on an aggregate, per occurrence or other basis, including by increasing the amount of its self-insured retention. In fact, in recent years, threeseveral of the largest third party insurers providing excess coverage for commercial trucking claims in the United States announced that in light of increased severity trends related to the increase in losses attributable to unfavorable verdicts, they would no longer provide such coverage. Decisions by these third party insurers to exit this line of business have had a significant negative impact on the availability and pricing of excess coverage for commercial trucking claims in the United States. No assurances can be given that other third party insurers will not also decide to exit the market as a provider of excess coverage for commercial trucking claims in the United States, which could have a further negative effect on the availability and pricing of such coverage. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that insurance coverage from third party insurers for claims in excess of the Company’s current self-insured retentions will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms.
12

Table of Contents

Dependence on independent commission sales agents.

As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Agent Network,” the Company markets its services primarily through independent commission sales agents. During fiscal year 2020, 5082022, 625 agents generated revenue for Landstar of at least $1 million each, or in the aggregate approximately 92%97% of Landstar’s consolidated revenue. Included among these Million Dollar Agents, 133 agents generated at least $10,000,000 of Landstar revenue during the 2022 fiscal year, or in the aggregate approximately 74% of Landstar’s consolidated revenue. Of these larger agencies, one such Landstar independent commission sales agency, itself with a very diversified customer base, generated approximately $866,000,000, or 12%, of Landstar’s consolidated revenue and approximately 7% of Landstar’s consolidated variable contribution in fiscal year 2022.

A number of these larger agencies, including the largest of Landstar’s independent commission sales agents by revenue, maintain administrative operations in countries outside of North America where the risks may be different than in the United States or Canada due to geopolitical, legal or other risks associated with maintaining administrative operations in such foreign jurisdictions. There can be no assurance regarding the potential disruption and impact adverse geopolitical developments in these foreign jurisdictions could have on the ability of certain large independent commission sales agents to generate and maintain administrative operations in support of significant amounts of Landstar revenue. As disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 28, 2022, the largest Landstar independent commission sales agency by revenue referenced above, while based in the United States, has significant administrative operations located in eastern Ukraine. The administrative operations of this agency were significantly disrupted during the onset of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The Company also has another of its largest independent commission sales agencies, as measured by revenue, that is based in the United States but conducts a portion of its administrative operations in western Ukraine. Russian efforts to destroy infrastructure throughout Ukraine

13


has impacted the availability of electricity and other basic utilities at various times throughout the country. The priority for Landstar and both of these agencies is the safety and well-being of these agencies’ Ukrainian workforces and their families. No assurances can be provided regarding the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the extent of potential future operational disruption the conflict may have on either of these Landstar agencies and the related impact of these disruptions on the Company.

Landstar competes with motor carriers and other third parties for the services of these independent commission sales agents. Landstar has historically experienced very limited agent turnover in the number of its Million Dollar Agents. There can be no assurances, however, that Landstar will continue to experience very limited turnover of its Million Dollar Agents in the future. Landstar’s contracts with its agents, including its Million Dollar Agents, are typically terminable without cause upon 10 to 30 days’ notice by either party and generally contain significant but not unqualified

non-compete
provisions restrictive covenants limiting the ability of a former agent to compete with Landstar for a specified period of time post-termination, and other restrictive covenants. The loss of some of the Company’s Million Dollar Agents and/or a significant decrease in revenue generated by Million Dollar Agents could have a material adverse effect on Landstar, including its results of operations and revenue.

Dependence on third party capacity providers.

As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Transportation Capacity,” Landstar does not own trucks or other transportation equipment (otherother than trailing equipment)equipment and relies on third party capacity providers, including BCO Independent Contractors, Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads and air and ocean cargo carriers, to transport freight for its customers. The Company competes with motor carriers and other third parties for the services of BCO Independent Contractors and other third party capacity providers. The market for qualified truck owner-operators and other third party truck capacity providers is very competitive among motor carriers, third party logistics companies and others and no assurances can be given that the Company will be able to maintain or expand the number of BCO Independent Contractors or other third party truck capacity providers. Additionally, the Company’s third party capacity providers other than BCO Independent Contractors can be expected, under certain circumstances, to charge higher prices to cover increased operating expenses, such as any increases in the cost of fuel, labor, equipment or insurance, and the Company’s operating income may decline without a corresponding increase in price to the customer. A significant decrease in available capacity provided by either the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors or other third party capacity providers, or increased rates charged by other third party capacity providers that cannot be passed through to customers, could have a material adverse effect on Landstar, including its results of operations and revenue.

The coronavirus (

(“COVID-19
) pandemic has hadmay have a significant adverse impact on our business.
The
COVID-19
pandemic has caused and continuesmay continue to cause significant disruptions in the global economy, which significantly intensified in the United States in late March and continued throughout the remainder of 2020. The situation with respect to the
COVID-19
pandemic continues to evolve and its effects, both short and long-term, remain unknown.economy. Economic disruptions and other effects on the global or domestic economies caused by the
COVID-19
pandemic could have a material adverse impact on the demand for our services and our abilityservices. In addition, although there has been an easing of governmental restrictions relating to obtain financing on favorable termsCOVID-19 in certain jurisdictions, restrictions could be reinstated in the future to manage a resurgence or at all.
new outbreak of COVID-19, including in connection with new variants or mutations of COVID-19.

In connection with the impact of the

COVID-19
pandemic, the Company experienced a significant decline in truckload volumes during the second quarter of 2020 compared to the corresponding period of 2019 followed by a similarly significant yet more gradual sequential increase in demand during the third and fourth quarters of 2020.2020, followed by two years of unprecedented strength in demand for the Company’s services in 2021 and 2022. This significant, rapid decrease in demand followed by the similarlyan ultimately more significant yet more gradual increase in demand was unprecedented in the history of the Company. The extent to which the
COVID-19
pandemic impacts the Company’s results in future quarters will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the duration of the pandemic, the actions taken by federal, state and localdomestic as well as foreign governments in response to the pandemic, the availability and effectiveness of vaccines for
COVID-19
and the length of time necessary for the global economy to transition back to more normal operating conditions.conditions, which could involve a decrease in overall economic demand as well as a secular shift in demand for goods back to services. These and other factors could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Moreover, the
COVID-19
virus continues to spread in areas where we provide services. The Landstar network includes over 1,100 independent agent locations throughout North America where such independent agents provide shipment coordination and dispatch services, freight tracking, trailer management and numerous other operational functions. Similarly, the Landstar network includes tens of thousands of truck capacity providers who operate throughout North America without any Landstar truck terminals. Management believes the decentralized nature of our model should insulate Landstar’s freight operations in an environment where social distancing can disrupt centralized business structures. A significant disruption to our independent agent network and/or a significant decrease in available truck capacity providers due to illness or government restrictions related to the
COVID-19
pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our ability to source capacity to service our customers and could have a significant impact on Landstar, including our results of operations, revenue and cash flows.
13

Table of Contents
In addition, the
COVID-19
pandemic has caused significant disruptions in the Mexican economy. During the Company’s 2020 fiscal year, the value of the Mexican peso to the U.S. dollar significantly depreciated and may continue to depreciate further. No assurances can be given regarding the potential impact of the
COVID-19
pandemic and other factors on the Mexican economy and the value of the Mexican peso relative to the U.S. dollar and could have a significant adverse impact on the financial condition and results of operations of our Mexican subsidiaries.

Disruptions or failures in the Company’s computer systems; cyber and other information security incidents.

As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Technology,” the Company’s information technology systems used in connection with its operations are located in Jacksonville, Florida and to a lesser extent in Rockford, Illinois. In addition, the Company utilizes several third party data centers throughout the U.S. Landstar relies, in the regular course of its business, on the proper operation of its information technology systems to link its extensive network of customers, employees, agents and third party capacity providers, including its BCO Independent Contractors. Moreover, in connection witha significant portion of the
COVID-19
pandemic, the Company has temporarily transitioned the vast majority of its office-based Company’s employees to
work-at-home
arrangements.work remotely or on a hybrid basis. Although the Company has redundant systems for its critical operations, any significant disruption or failure of its technology systems or those of third party data centers on which it relies

14


could significantly disrupt the Company’s operations and impose significant costs on the Company. Moreover, it is critical that the data processed by or stored in the Company’s information technology systems or otherwise in the Company’s possession remain confidential, as it often includes confidential, proprietary and/or competitively sensitive information regarding our customers, employees, agents and third party capacity providers, key financial and operational results and statistics, and our strategic plans, including technology innovations, developments and enhancements. Cyber incidents that impact the security, availability, reliability, speed, accuracy or other proper functioning of these systems and data, including outages, computer viruses,

break-ins
and similar disruptions, could have a significant impact on our operations. Accordingly, information security and the continued development and enhancement of the controls and processes designed to protect our systems, computers, software, data and networks from attack, damage or unauthorized access remain a priority for us. Although we believe that we have robust security procedures and other safeguards in place, as threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to enhance our information security measures and/or to investigate and remediate any security vulnerabilities. For example, in the first quarter of 2016, we were subject to “spear-phishing” attacks through which third parties were able to obtain personal employee data. We have undertaken a number of remedial measures in response, including enhancing our security systems and additional training for our employees. Additional incidents may occur in the future and may have a material adverse effect on our business and operations. A significant incident, including system failure, security breach, disruption by malware, or other damage, could interrupt or delay our operations, damage our reputation, cause a loss of customers, agents and/or third party capacity providers, expose us to a risk of loss or litigation, and/or cause us to incur significant time and expense to remedy such an event, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Although the Company maintains cybersecurity and business interruption insurance, the Company’s insurance may not be adequate to cover all losses that may be incurred in the event of a significant disruption or failure of its information technology systems. In addition, cybersecurity and business interruption insurance could in the future become more expensive and difficult to maintain and may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Dependence on key vendors.

As described above under “
Dependence on third party insurance companies
and “
Disruptions or failures in the Company’s computer systems; cyber and other information security incidents,
” the Company is dependent on certain vendors, including third party insurance companies, third party data center providers, third party information technology application providers and third party payment disbursement providers. Any inability to negotiate satisfactory terms with one of these key vendors or any other significant disruption to or termination of a relationship with one of these key vendors could disrupt the Company’s operations and impose significant costs on the Company.
Catastrophic loss of a Company facility.
The Company faces the risk of a catastrophic loss of the use of all or a portion of its facilities located in Jacksonville, Florida, Laredo, Texas and Rockford, Illinois due to hurricanes, flooding, tornados, other weather conditions, natural disasters, terrorist attacks or otherwise. The Company’s corporate headquarters and approximately
two-thirds
of the Company’s employees are located in its Jacksonville, Florida facility. In particular, a significant hurricane or similar catastrophic event that impacts the Jacksonville, Florida metropolitan area could significantly disrupt the Company’s operations and impose significant costs on the Company.
Although the Company maintains insurance covering its facilities, including business interruption insurance, the Company’s insurance may not be adequate to cover all losses that may be incurred in the event of a catastrophic loss of one of the Company’s facilities. In addition, such insurance, including business interruption insurance, could in the future become more expensive and difficult to maintain and may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
14

Table of Contents

Economic, Competitive and Industry Risks

Decreased demand for transportation services; U.S. trade relationships.

The transportation industry historically has experienced cyclical financial results as a result of slowdowns in economic activity, the business cycles of customers, and other economic factors beyond Landstar’s control. If a slowdown in economic activity or a downturn in the Company’s customers’ business cycles cause a reduction in the volume of freight shipped by those customers, the Company’s operating results could be materially adversely affected.

In addition, Landstar hauls a significant number of shipments that have either been imported into the United States or are destined for export from the United States. Any decision by the U.S. government to adopt actions such as a border tax on imports, an increase in customs duties or tariffs, the renegotiation of U.S. trade agreements or any other action that could have a negative impact on international trade could cause a reduction in the volume of freight shipped by many Landstar customers. Any changes in tax and trade policies in the United States and corresponding actions by other countries could adversely affect our financial performance.

Substantial industry competition.

As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Competition,” Landstar competes primarily in the transportation and logistics services industry. This industry is extremely competitive and fragmented. Landstar competes primarily with truckload carriers, intermodal transportation service providers, railroads, less-than-truckload carriers, third party logistics companies, digital freight brokers and other asset-light transportation and logistics service providers. Management believes that competition for the freight transported by the Company is based on service, efficiency and freight rates, which are influenced significantly by the economic environment, particularly the amount of available transportation capacity and freight demand. In recent years, the use of technology and the implementation of technology-based innovations have become increasingly important to compete within the transportation and logistics industry. In particular, management believes leadership in the development, operation and support of an ecosystem of digital technologies and applications is an ongoing part of providing high quality service. The failure of the Company to maintain or enhance its technology ecosystem in response to changing demands from customers, agents, and capacity providers could have a significant adverse impact on Landstar’s ability to compete for customers, agents and capacity providers in the transportation and logistics industry. Historically,

15


In addition, competition in our industry, historically, has created downward pressure on freight rates. In addition, manyMany large shippers are using third party logistics providers (“3PLs”)use 3PLs other than the Company to outsource the management and coordination of their transportation needs rather than directly arrangingarrange for transportation services with carriers. As noted above, there were 1214 transportation service providers, including 3PLs, included in the Company’s top 25 customers for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2020.31, 2022. Usage by large shippers of 3PLs often provides carriers, such as the Company, with a less direct relationship with the shipper and, as a result, may increase pressure on freight rates while making it more difficult for the Company to compete primarily based on service and efficiency. A decrease in freight rates could have a material adverse effect on Landstar, including its revenue and operating income.

Legal, Tax, Regulatory and Compliance Risks

Status of independent contractors.

In recent years, the topic of the classification of individuals as employees or independent contractors has gained increased attention among federal and state regulators as well as the plaintiffs’ bar. Various legislative or regulatory proposals have been introduced at the federal and state levels that may affect the classification status of individuals as independent contractors or employees for either employment tax purposes (e.g., withholding, social security, Medicare and unemployment taxes) or other benefits available to employees (most notably, workers’ compensation benefits). Recently, certain states (most prominently, California) have seen significant increased activity by tax and other regulators and numerous class action lawsuits filed against transportation companies that engage independent contractors.

There are many different tests and standards that may apply to the determination of whether a relationship is that of an independent contractor or one of employment. For example, different standards may be applied by the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. Department of Labor, the National Labor Relations Board, state unemployment agencies, state departments of labor, state taxing authorities, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, state discrimination or disability benefit administrators and state workers compensation boards, among others. For federal tax purposes, most individuals are classified as employees or independent contractors based on a multi-factor

“common-law”
analysis rather than any definition found in the Internal Revenue Code or Internal Revenue Service regulations. In addition, under Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978, a taxpayer that meets certain criteria may treat an individual as an independent contractor for employment tax purposes if the taxpayer has been audited without being told to treat similarly situated workers as employees, if the taxpayer has received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or a court decision affirming the taxpayer’s treatment of the individual as an independent contractor, or if the taxpayer is following a long-standing recognized practice.

The Company classifies its BCO Independent Contractors and independent commission sales agents as independent contractors for all purposes, including employment tax and employee benefits. There can be no assurance that legislative, judicial, administrative or regulatory (including tax) authorities will not introduce proposals or assert interpretations of existing rules and regulations that would change the employee/independent contractor classification of BCO Independent Contractors or independent commission sales agents doing business with the Company. On September 18, 2019, California enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 5 into law, codifying the strict “ABC” test for purposes of determining a worker’s status as an independent contractor or employee under

15

Table of Contents
California law. While new in California, versions of the ABC test have existed in a number of other states over the years and have been challenged in various courts as violating the federal government’s exclusive right to regulate trucking in certain areas of law and interstate commerce. The Company continues to monitor and analyze the impact of the new law, which became effective as of January 1, 2020, including what steps may be necessary or advisable to adapt to a changing legal and regulatory environment in California. The Company has BCO Independent Contractors, Truck Brokerage Carriers and independent commission sales agents who reside in and/or principally operate their business in California that could be impacted by AB 5 or similar laws, which could eventually affect our relationship with them. Additionally, the new law may have a significant impact on our Truck Brokerage Carriers based in California who utilize owner-operators to provide various types of transportation services such as drayage, regional or local delivery. Since the Company is neither incorporated nor headquartered in California and the vast majority of BCO Independent Contractors, Truck Brokerage Carriers and independent commission sales agents currently doing business with the Company reside and principally operate outside of California, we do not expect AB 5 to have a material impact on Landstar’s overall network of BCO Independent Contractors, Truck Brokerage Carriers and independent commission sales agents. Nevertheless, there remains significant uncertainty regarding many aspects of the new law, including how the law will be interpreted and enforced by state and local governments as well as by courts.

Potential changes, if any, that could impact the legal classification of the independent contractor relationship between the Company and BCO Independent Contractors or independent commission sales agents could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s operating model. Further, the costs associated with any such potential changes could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition if Landstar were unable to pass through to its customers an increase in price corresponding to such increased costs. Moreover, class action litigation in this area against other transportation companies has resulted in significant damage awards and/or monetary settlements for workers who have been allegedly misclassified as independent contractors and the legal and other related expenses associated with litigating these cases can be substantial.

16


Regulatory and legislative changes.

As noted above in Item 1, “Business — Factors Significant to the Company’s Operations — Regulation,” certain of the Operating Subsidiaries are motor carriers and/or property brokers authorized to arrange for transportation services by motor carriers which are regulated by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (“FMCSA”), an agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and by various state agencies. Several of the Operating Subsidiaries maintain a federal hazardous materials safety permit and, as a result, have an increased risk of compliance review by the FMCSA. Certain of the Operating Subsidiaries are licensed as Ocean Transportation Intermediaries by the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission as
non-vessel-operating
common carriers and/or as ocean freight forwarders. The Company’s air transportation activities in the United States are subject to regulation by the U.S. Department of Transportation as an indirect air carrier. One of the Company’s subsidiaries is licensed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through the Bureau of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“U.S. Customs”) as a customs broker. The Company is also subject to regulations and requirements relating to safety and security promulgated by, among others, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security through U.S. Customs and the Transportation Security Administration, the Canada Border Services Agency and various state and local agencies and port authorities.

The transportation industry is subject to other potential regulatory and legislative changes (such as the possibility of more stringent environmental, climate change and/or safety/security regulations, limits on vehicle weight and size and regulations relating to the health and wellness of commercial truck operators) that may affect the economics of the industry by requiring changes in operating practices, by changing the demand for motor carrier services or the cost of providing truckload or other transportation or logistics services, or by adversely impacting the number of available commercial truck operators.

In particular, the FMCSA in recent years proposed a number of regulatory changes that affect the operation of commercial motor carriers across the United States. It is difficult to predict in what form FMCSA regulations may be implemented, modified or enforced and what impact any such regulations may have on motor carrier operations or the aggregate number of trucks that provide hauling capacity to the Company. For example, on January 6, 2020, the FMCSA implemented new requirements applicable to drug and alcohol testing by motor carriers. The new regulation expandsexpanded motor carrier reporting requirements to include reporting of all operators who test positive and/or refuse to submit to a test as prescribed in the regulation. The new regulation also expandsexpanded rules relating to the obligation of motor carriers to conduct queries to check if current or prospective operators are prohibited from operating a commercial motor vehicle due to a positive or unresolved drug or alcohol test. The expanded reporting of positive results, or of an operator’s refusal to meet FMCSA testing requirements, to a centralized clearinghouse prescribed by FMCSA has the potential to remove operators from service that may otherwise have been undetected or unreported.

In addition, in December 2010, the FMCSA introduced the Compliance Safety Accountability (“CSA”) motor carrier oversight program. The Company believes the intent of this program is to improve regulatory oversight of motor carriers and commercial drivers using a safety measurement system methodology that is fundamentally different from the methodology that the

16

Table of Contents
FMCSA historically relied upon. Under CSA, the FMCSA monitors seven Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories, or BASICs, under which a motor carrier may be evaluated against established threshold scores for each such BASIC. In the event a motor carrier has one or more BASIC scores that exceeds the applicable threshold, the motor carrier has an increased risk of roadside inspection and/or compliance review by FMCSA. Under the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, or the “FAST Act” signed into law on December 4, 2015, the FMCSA was required to engage the National Research Council to conduct a study of CSA and the Safety Measurement System (“SMS”) utilized by the CSA program. As a result of the FAST Act, the FMCSA announced the removal of the BASIC scores from public view and that such scores are expected to remain hidden from public view while changes to CSA are considered. In 2018, the FMCSA announced significant anticipated changes to CSA that if enacted would be expected to have a material impact on the current program. As of the end of 2022, no such changes to CSA have yet been enacted. No assurances can be given with respect to the changes that may be made to the CSA program, or any replacement or supplemental program, in the future and what impact a new or revised motor carrier oversight programprograms implemented by the FMCSA could have on the Company, its motor carrier operations or the aggregate number of trucks that provide hauling capacity to the Company.

Regulations focused on diesel emissions and other air quality matters.

Focus on diesel emissions, climate change and related air quality matters has led to efforts by federal, state and local governmental agencies to support legislation and regulations to limit the amount of carbon emissions, including emissions created by diesel engines utilized in tractors such as those operated by the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors and Truck Brokerage Carriers. Moreover, federal, state and local governmental agencies may also focus on regulation in relation to trailing equipment specifications in an effort to achieve, among other things, lower carbon emissions. For example, under the federal Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) is responsible for prescribing national ambient air quality standards (“NAAQS”) for certain air pollutants, and each state is

17


responsible for implementing those standards within its borders. Specifically, each state must adopt, and submit for the EPA’s approval, a state implementation plan (“SIP”) that provides for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the NAAQS. In connection with its efforts to comply with the NAAQS, the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) has implemented regulations that restrict the ability of certain tractors and trailers from operating in California and that impose emission standards on nearly all diesel-fueled trucks with gross vehicle weight ratings in excess of 14,000 lbs. that operate in California. Moreover, these emission standards are scheduled tohave become increasingly stringent such that byover time. As of January 1, 2023, nearly all diesel-fueled trucks with gross vehicle weight ratings in excess of 14,000 lbs. that operate in California will beare required to have a 2010 or newer model year engine. In 2012, the EPA formally approved certain CARB regulations as part of California’s SIP, including CARB’s “Regulation to Reduce Emissions of Diesel Particulate Matter, Oxides of Nitrogen and Other Criteria Pollutants from

In-Use
Heavy-Duty Diesel-Fueled Vehicles” (commonly referred to as the “Truck and Bus Regulation”) and “Regulation to Reduce Emissions of Diesel Particulate Matter, Oxides of Nitrogen and Other Criteria Pollutants from
In-Use
Heavy-Duty Diesel-Fueled Drayage Trucks” (commonly referred to as the “Drayage Truck Regulation”). The EPA thereafter received express authorization to enforce California’s SIP, including the Truck and Bus Regulation and the Drayage Truck Regulation.
In June 2016, Landstar Ranger, Inc. received an information request from the EPA to determine the Clean Air Act compliance status of Landstar Ranger, Inc. with respect to the Truck and Bus Regulation and the Drayage Truck Regulation in the state of California. Landstar Ranger, Inc. believes it complied with this information request; however, the timing and outcome of the review by the EPA and any subsequent action by the EPA, if any, cannot be predicted. The Company may incur significant legal and other professional fees in connection with the EPA’s review. If the Company is found to be in noncompliance with CARB regulations, the EPA and CARB may seek to impose significant fines and penalties, or injunctive relief, on the Company. Further, the Company reorganized its entire fleet of van trailing equipment to maintain CARB-compliant trailer operations. Moreover, no No assurances can be given with respect to the extent BCO Independent Contractors will choose to become CARB-compliant by purchasing a new or used CARB-compliant tractor, replacing the engine in their existing tractor with a CARB-compliant engine or performing an exhaust retrofit of their existing tractor by installing a particulate matter filter. Accordingly, many of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors may choose not to haul loads that would require travel within California, which could affect the ability of the Company to service customer freight needs for freight originating from, delivering to or traveling through California. Furthermore, increased regulation of tractor or trailing equipment specifications, including emissions created by diesel engines, could create substantial costs for the Company’s third party capacity providers and, in turn, increase the cost of purchased transportation to the Company. An increase in the costs to purchase, lease or maintain tractor or trailing equipment or in purchased transportation cost caused by existing or new regulations without a corresponding increase in price to the customer could adversely affect Landstar, including its results of operations and financial condition.
17

Table of Contents

General Risk Factors

Potential changes in taxes.

From time to time, various legislative proposals are introduced to increase federal, state, or local taxes. On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Reform Act”). The legislation significantly changed U.S. tax law by, among other things, lowering corporate income tax rates, implementing a territorial tax system and imposing a repatriation tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. With respect to the change in corporate tax rates, the Tax Reform Act permanently reduced the U.S. corporate income tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% rate, effective January 1, 2018. In connection with this reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate, the Company revalued its ending net deferred tax liabilities at December 30, 2017 resulting in a provisional $20,430,000 tax benefit in the Company’s consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017. The Company cannot predict whether, or in what form, any increase in corporate income tax rates, motor fuel tax rates or other tax rates applicable to the transportation services provided by the Company will be enacted and, if enacted, how such increased tax rates may impact the Company. As an example, for every 100 basis point increase in the U.S. corporate income tax rate the Company would recognize a one-time tax charge of approximately $1,400,000 in connection with revaluing its ending net deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2022. With respect to potential increases in fuel and similar taxes, it is unclear whether or not the Company’s Truck Brokerage Carriers would attempt to pass the increase on to the Company or if the Company will be able to reflect this potential increased cost of capacity, if any, in prices to customers. Any such increase in fuel taxes, without a corresponding increase in price to the customer, could have a material adverse effect on Landstar, including its results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, competition from other transportation service companies including those that provide
non-trucking
modes of transportation would likely increase if state or federal taxes on fuel were to increase without a corresponding increase in taxes imposed upon other modes of transportation.

On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law by President Biden. The Inflation Reduction Act establishes a one percent excise tax on stock repurchases made by publicly traded U.S. corporations. This provision is effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022. The excise tax could have an adverse effect on the Company’s cash flows.

Intellectual property.

The Company uses both internally developed and purchased technology in conducting its business. Whether internally developed or purchased, it is possible that the use of these technologies could be claimed to infringe upon or violate the intellectual property rights of third parties. In the event that a claim is made against the Company by a third party for the infringement of intellectual property rights, any settlement or adverse judgment against the Company either in the form of increased costs of licensing or a cease and desist order in using the technology could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business and its results of operations.

18


Unclaimed property
. The Company is subject to federal and state laws relating to abandoned and unclaimed property. States routinely audit the records of companies to assess compliance with such laws. The Company is currently undergoing a multi-state unclaimed property audit. The Company is also undergoing a separate unclaimed property audit conducted by the State of Delaware, and in connection with that audit, the Company has entered into a voluntary disclosure agreement with the Delaware Department of Finance. The timing and outcome of either the multi-state unclaimed property audit or the Delaware audit cannot be predicted. The Company may incur significant professional fees in connection with these audits. If the Company is found to be in noncompliance with applicable unclaimed property laws or the manner in which such laws are interpreted or applied, states may determine that they are entitled to the remittance by the Company of significant amounts of unclaimed or abandoned property and further may seek to impose other significant costs on the Company, including penalties and interest.
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.
Properties

Item 2.

Properties

The Company owns or leases various properties in the U.S., Canada and Mexico for the Company’s operations and administrative staff that support its independent commission sales agents, BCO Independent Contractors and other third party capacity providers. The transportation logistics segment’s primary facilities are located in Jacksonville, Florida and Rockford, Illinois. In addition, the Company’s corporate headquarters are located in Jacksonville, Florida. The Company also maintains a key freight staging and transload facility in Laredo, Texas. The Jacksonville, Florida, Rockford, Illinois and Laredo, Texas facilities are owned by the Company. The Company also maintains a network of owned and leased field operations centers in the United States and Canada in support of the ongoing recruitment and retention of its BCO Independent Contractors. Management believes that Landstar’s owned and leased properties are adequate for its current needs and that leased properties can be retained or replaced at an acceptable cost.

Item 3.
Legal Proceedings

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

See Item 7, “

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Legal Proceedings
”.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

19


18

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Common Stock of the Company is listed and traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “LSTR.”

The reported last sale price per share of the Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on January 22, 202127, 2023 was $152.37$172.65 per share. As of such date, Landstar had 38,386,76835,928,383 shares of Common Stock outstanding and had 113131 stockholders of record of its Common Stock. However, the Company estimates that it has a significantly greater number of stockholders because a substantial number of the Company’s shares are held by brokers or dealers for their customers in street name.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Company

The Company did not purchase any shares of its Common Stock during the period from September 27, 202025, 2022 to December 26, 2020,31, 2022, the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter.

On December 9, 2019,7, 2021, the Landstar System, Inc. Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase up to 1,849,0681,912,824 shares of the Company’s Common Stock from time to time in the open market and in privately negotiated transactions. On December 6, 2022, the Landstar System, Inc. Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase up to 1,900,826 additional shares of the Company’s Common Stock from time to time in the open market and in privately negotiated transactions. As of December 26, 2020,31, 2022, the Company had authorization to purchase in the aggregate up to 1,821,0303,000,000 shares of its Common Stock under this program.these programs. No specific expiration date has been assigned to the December 9, 2019 authorization.

7, 2021 or December 6, 2022 authorizations.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The Company maintains a stock compensation plan for members of its Board of Directors, the 2022 Directors Stock Compensation Plan (the “2022 DSCP”), and twoan employee equity incentive plans.plan, the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 EIP”). The following table presents information related to securities authorized for issuance under these plans at December 26, 2020:

Plan Category
  
Number of Securities

to be Issued Upon

Exercise of

Outstanding Options
   
Weighted-average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options
   
Number of Securities

Remaining Available for

Future Issuance Under

Equity Compensation

Plans
 
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders
   17,650   $54.16    3,732,872 
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders
   0    0    0 
31, 2022:                

Plan Category

  Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options
   Weighted-average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options
   Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans
 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

   1,900   $56.40    3,435,525 

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

   0    0    0 

Under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 EIP”),EIP, the issuance of (i) a

non-vested
share of Landstar Common Stock issued in the form of restricted stock and (ii) a share of Landstar Common Stock issued upon the vesting of a previously granted restricted stock unit each counts as the issuance of two securities against the number of securities available for future issuance. Included in the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans were 60,586193,217 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the 2013 Directors’ Stock Compensation Plan.2022 DSCP.

20


19

Table of Contents

Financial Model Shareholder Returns

The following graph illustrates the return that would have been realized, assuming reinvestment of dividends, by an investor who invested $100 in each of the Company’s Common Stock, the Standard and Poor’s 500 Stock Index and the Dow Jones Transportation Stock Index for the period commencing December 26, 201530, 2017 through December 26, 2020.31, 2022.

LOGO

21


20

Table of Contents

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data
Not applicable.
Reserved

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

The following is a “safe harbor” statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements contained in this document that are not based on historical facts are “forward-looking statements.” This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this Form

10-K
contain forward-looking statements, such as statements which relate to Landstar’s business objectives, plans, strategies and expectations. Terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “intention,” “expects,” “plans,” “predicts,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “will,” the negative thereof and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are by nature subject to uncertainties and risks, including but not limited to: the impact of the Russian conflict with Ukraine on the operations of certain independent commission sales agents, including the Company’s largest such agent by revenue in the 2022 fiscal year; the impact of the coronavirus
(COVID-19)
pandemic; an increase in the frequency or severity of accidents or other claims; unfavorable development of existing accident claims; dependence on third party insurance companies; dependence on independent commission sales agents; dependence on third party capacity providers; decreased demand for transportation services; U.S. foreign trade relationships; substantial industry competition; disruptions or failures in the Company’s computer systems; cyber and other information security incidents; dependence on key vendors; changes in fuel taxes; status of independent contractors; regulatory and legislative changes; regulations focused on diesel emissions and other air quality matters; catastrophic loss of a Company facility; intellectual property; unclaimed property; and other operational, financial or legal risks or uncertainties detailed in this and Landstar’s other SEC filings from time to time and described in Item 1A in this Form
10-K
under the heading “Risk Factors.” These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results or events to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated. Investors should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Introduction

Landstar System, Inc. and its subsidiary, Landstar System Holdings, Inc. (collectively referred to herein with their subsidiaries and other affiliated companies as “Landstar” or the “Company”), is a worldwide, technology-enabled, asset-light provider of integrated transportation management solutions.solutions delivering safe, specialized transportation services to a broad range of customers utilizing a network of agents, third party capacity providers and employees. The Company offers services to its customers across multiple transportation modes, with the ability to arrange for individual shipments of freight to comprehensive third party logistics solutions to meet all of a customer’s transportation needs. Landstar provides services principally throughout the United States and to a lesser extent in Canada and Mexico, and between the United States and Canada, Mexico and other countries around the world. The Company’s services emphasize safety, information coordination and customer service and are delivered through a network of over 1,100 independent commission sales agents and approximately 79,000over 108,000 third party capacity providers, primarily truck capacity providers, linked together by a series of digital technologies which are provided and coordinated by the Company. The nature of the Company’s business is such that a significant portion of its operating costs varies directly with revenue.

Landstar markets its integrated transportation management solutions primarily through independent commission sales agents and exclusively utilizes third party capacity providers to transport customers’ freight. Landstar’s independent commission sales agents enter into contractual arrangements with the Company and are responsible for locating freight, making that freight available to Landstar’s capacity providers and coordinating the transportation of the freight with customers and capacity providers. The Company’s third party capacity providers consist of independent contractors who provide truck capacity to the Company under exclusive lease arrangements (the “BCO Independent Contractors”), unrelated trucking companies who provide truck capacity to the Company under

non-exclusive
contractual arrangements (the “Truck Brokerage Carriers”), air cargo carriers, ocean cargo carriers and railroads. Through this network of agents and capacity providers linked together by Landstar’s seriesecosystem of digital technologies, Landstar operates an integrated transportation management solutions business primarily throughout North America with revenue of $4.1$7.4 billion during the most recently completed fiscal year. The Company reports the results of two operating segments: the transportation logistics segment and the insurance segment.

The transportation logistics segment provides a wide range of integrated transportation management solutions. Transportation services are provided by Landstar’s “Operating Subsidiaries”: Landstar Ranger, Inc., Landstar Inway, Inc., Landstar Ligon, Inc., Landstar Gemini, Inc., Landstar Transportation Logistics, Inc., Landstar Global Logistics, Inc., Landstar Express America, Inc., Landstar Canada, Inc., Landstar Metro, S.A.P.I. de C.V., and as further described below, Landstar Metro, Landstar Servicios and Landstar Blue.Blue, LLC. Transportation services offered by the Company include truckload, less-than-truckload and less-than-truckloadother truck transportation, rail intermodal, air cargo, ocean cargo, expedited

22


21

Table of Contents

expedited ground and air delivery of time-critical freight, heavy-haul/specialized, U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico cross-border, intra-Mexico, intra-Canada, project cargo and customs brokerage. Examples of the industries serviced by the transportation logistics segment include automotive parts and assemblies, consumer durables, building products, metals, chemicals, foodstuffs, heavy machinery, retail, electronics and military equipment. In addition, the transportation logistics segment provides transportation services to other transportation companies, including third party logistics and less-than-truckload service providers. Each of theThe independent commission sales agents has the opportunity to market all of the services provided by the transportation logistics segment. Billings for freight transportation services are typically charged to customers on a per shipment basis for the physical transportation of freight and are referred to as transportation revenue. During fiscal year 2020,2022, revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors, Truck Brokerage Carriers and railroads represented approximately 45%35%, 47%54% and 3%2%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated revenue. Collectively, revenue generated by air and ocean cargo carriers represented approximately 3%8% of the Company’s consolidated revenue during fiscal year 2020.

During 2017, the Company incorporated Landstar Metro, S.A.P.I. de C.V., a transportation logistics company (“Landstar Metro”), and Landstar Metro Servicios S.A.P.I. de C.V., a services company (“Landstar Servicios”), each based in Mexico City, Mexico. Landstar Metro provides freight and logistics services within the country of Mexico and in conjunction with Landstar’s U.S./Mexico cross-border services. Landstar Servicios provides various administrative, financial, operational, safety and compliance services to Landstar Metro. The results of operations from Landstar Metro and Landstar Servicios are presented as part of the Company’s transportation logistics segment. On September 20, 2017, Landstar Metro acquired substantially all of the assets of the asset-light transportation logistics business of a Mexican transportation logistics company. In connection with the acquisition, individuals affiliated with the seller subscribed for equity interests in Landstar Metro and Landstar Servicios, and as of December 29, 2018, owned in the aggregate approximately 21% of the equity interests of each of them. On January 29, 2019, Landstar acquired all of the remaining equity interests in Landstar Metro and Landstar Servicios held by their former minority equityholders. Accordingly, as of such date, Landstar Metro and Landstar Servicios each became wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. Revenue from Landstar Metro represented less than 1% of the Company’s transportation logistics segment revenue during fiscal year 2020.
2022.

On May 6, 2020, the Company formed a new subsidiary that was subsequently renamed Landstar Blue, LLC (“Landstar Blue”). Landstar Blue arranges truckload brokerage services while helpingwith a focus on the contract services market. Landstar Blue also helps the Company to develop and test digital technologies and processes for the benefit of all Landstar independent commission sales agents. On June 15, 2020, Landstar Blue completed the acquisition of an independent agent of the Company whose business focused on truckload brokerage services. The results of operations from Landstar Blue are presented as part of the Company’s transportationstransportation logistics segment. Revenue from Landstar Blue represented less thanapproximately 1% of the Company’s transportation logistics segment revenue during fiscal year 2020.

2022.

The insurance segment is comprised of Signature Insurance Company (“Signature”), a wholly owned offshore insurance subsidiary, and Risk Management Claim Services, Inc. The insurance segment provides risk and claims management services to certain of Landstar’s Operating Subsidiaries. In addition, it reinsures certain risks of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors and provides certain property and casualty insurance directly to certain of Landstar’s Operating Subsidiaries. Revenue at the insurance segment represents reinsurance premiums from third party insurance companies that provide insurance programs to BCO Independent Contractors where all or a portion of the risk is ultimately borne by Signature. Revenue at the insurance segment represented approximately 1% of the Company’s consolidated revenue for fiscal year 2020.

2022.

Changes in Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management believes the Company’s success principally depends on its ability to generate freight through its network of independent commission sales agents and to deliver freight safely and efficiently deliver that freight utilizing third party capacity providers. Management believes the most significant factors to the Company’s success include increasing revenue, sourcing capacity, empowering its network through technology-based tools and controlling costs, including insurance and claims.

22

Table of Contents

Revenue

While customer demand, which is subject to overall economic conditions, ultimately drives increases or decreases in revenue, the Company primarily relies on its independent commission sales agents to establish customer relationships and generate revenue opportunities. Management’s emphasis with respect to revenue growth is on revenue generated by independent commission sales agents who on an annual basis generate $1 million or more of Landstar revenue. Management believes future revenue growth is primarily dependent on its ability to increase both the revenue generated by Million Dollar Agents and the number of Million Dollar Agents through a combination of recruiting new agents, increasing the revenue opportunities generated by existing independent commission sales agents and providing its independent commission sales agents with digital technologies they may use to grow revenue and increase efficiencies at their businesses. The following table shows the number of Million Dollar Agents, the average revenue generated by these agents and the percent of consolidated revenue generated by these agents during the past three fiscal years:

   
Fiscal Years
 
   
2020
  
2019
  
2018
 
Number of Million Dollar Agents
   508   555   608 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Average revenue generated per Million Dollar Agent
  $7,489,000  $6,880,000  $7,150,000 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Percent of consolidated revenue generated by Million Dollar Agents
   92  93  94
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 

   Fiscal Years 
   2022  2021  2020 

Number of Million Dollar Agents

   625   593   508 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Average revenue generated per Million Dollar Agent

  $11,499,000  $10,371,000  $7,489,000 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Percent of consolidated revenue generated by Million Dollar Agents

   97  94  92
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The change in the number of Million Dollar Agents on a year-over-year basis is influenced by many factors and is not solely the result of terminations of contractual relationships between agents and the Company, whether such terminations are initiated by the agent or the Company. Such other factors include consolidations among agencies or transactions in connection with ownership changes often due to retirement planning, estate planning or similar transitional issues.matters. The change in the number of Million Dollar

23


Agents on a year-over-year basis may also be affected by agents that remain with the Company yet experienced lower year-over-year revenue that resulted in such agent moving below the Million Dollar Agent category. Revenue from accounts formerly handled by terminated Million Dollar Agents is often retained by the Company as the customer may choose to transfer its account to an existing Landstar agent.

Historically, the Company has experienced very few terminations of its Million Dollar Agents, whether such terminations are initiated by the agent or the Company. Annual terminations of Million Dollar Agents have typically been less than 3% of the total number of Million Dollar Agents. Revenue from accounts formerly handled by terminated Million Dollar Agents is often retained by the Company as the customer may choose to transfer its account to an existing Landstar agent.

In fiscal year 2020,2022, the change in the number of Million Dollar Agents was entirely attributable to new agents generating under $5 million of Landstar revenue perand existing agents who were not formerly Million Dollar Agents. Included among the Company’s Million Dollar Agents in the 2022 fiscal year, as the Company experienced nohad 133 independent sales agencies that generated at least $10 million in Landstar revenue. In fiscal year 2021, the change in the number of Million Dollar Agents was attributable to growth in existing agents who were former Million Dollar Agents whose businesses were temporarily impacted in fiscal year 2020 compared toby the COVID-19 pandemic as well as new agents and existing agents who were not formerly Million Dollar Agents. Included among the Company’s Million Dollar Agents in the 2021 fiscal year, 2019 in the number ofCompany had 115 independent sales agents generating $5agencies that generated at least $10 million or more ofin Landstar revenue. During fiscal year 2020, the

COVID-19

24

pandemic impacted the number of agents generating under $5 million of Landstar revenue both with respect to existing agents, some of whom had difficulty operating their small businesses during the pandemic due to personal issues, staffing issues and/or customer issues, and with respect to the Company’s ability to recruit new independent sales agents to the Landstar network, given the uncertain operating environment and challenges we experienced in building personal relationships with prospective agent candidates during the pandemic.


23

Table of Contents

Management monitors business activity by tracking the number of loads (volume) and revenue per load by mode of transportation. Revenue per load can be influenced by many factors other than a change in price. Those factors include the average length of haul, freight type, special handling and equipment requirements, fuel costs and delivery time requirements. For shipments involving two or more modes of transportation, revenue is generally classified by the mode of transportation having the highest cost for the load. The following table summarizes this information by trailer type for truck transportation and by mode for all others for the past three fiscal years:

   
Fiscal Years
 
   
2020
  
2019
  
2018
 
Revenue generated through (in thousands)
:
    
Truck transportation
    
Truckload:
    
Van equipment
  $ 2,515,940  $ 2,371,188  $ 2,791,494 
Unsided/platform equipment
   1,202,295   1,295,817   1,386,387 
Less-than-truckload
   97,546   98,324   102,531 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total truck transportation
   3,815,781   3,765,329   4,280,412 
Rail intermodal
   114,313   118,305   128,976 
Ocean and air cargo carriers
   132,180   121,485   134,577 
Other
(1)
   70,707   79,458   71,179 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
  $4,132,981  $4,084,577  $4,615,144 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Revenue on loads hauled via BCO Independent Contractors included in total truck transportation
  $1,866,526  $1,831,752  $2,001,665 
Number of loads
:
    
Truck transportation
    
Truckload:
    
Van equipment
   1,318,768   1,337,089   1,398,388 
Unsided/platform equipment
   487,348   513,579   516,613 
Less-than-truckload
   163,024   155,592   145,269 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total truck transportation
   1,969,140   2,006,260   2,060,270 
Rail intermodal
   46,280   47,590   53,030 
Ocean and air cargo carriers
   31,900   30,110   28,970 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
   2,047,320   2,083,960   2,142,270 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Loads hauled via BCO Independent Contractors included in total truck transportation
   945,210   954,990   949,330 
Revenue per load
:
    
Truck transportation
    
Truckload:
    
Van equipment
  $1,908  $1,773  $1,996 
Unsided/platform equipment
   2,467   2,523   2,684 
Less-than-truckload
   598   632   706 
Total truck transportation
   1,938   1,877   2,078 
Rail intermodal
   2,470   2,486   2,432 
Ocean and air cargo carriers
   4,144   4,035   4,645 
Revenue per load on loads hauled via BCO Independent Contractors
  $ 1,975  $ 1,918  $ 2,109 
Revenue by capacity type (as a % of total revenue)
:
    
Truck capacity providers:
    
BCO Independent Contractors
   45  45  43
Truck Brokerage Carriers
   47  47  49
Rail intermodal
   3  3  3
Ocean and air cargo carriers
   3  3  3
Other
   2  2  2

   Fiscal Years 
   2022  2021  2020 

Revenue generated through (in thousands):

    

Truck transportation

    

Truckload:

    

Van equipment

  $ 3,892,085  $ 3,525,830  $ 2,192,254 

Unsided/platform equipment

   1,760,357   1,549,037   1,119,272 

Less-than-truckload

   142,438   117,505   97,546 

Other truck transportation (1)

   835,959   770,846   406,709 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total truck transportation

   6,630,839   5,963,218   3,815,781 

Rail intermodal

   145,017   159,974   114,313 

Ocean and air cargo carriers

   558,986   327,160   132,180 

Other (2)

   101,720   87,216   70,707 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  $7,436,562  $6,537,568  $4,132,981 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Revenue on loads hauled via BCO Independent Contractors included in total truck transportation

  $2,636,036  $2,612,188  $1,866,526 

Number of loads:

    

Truck transportation

    

Truckload:

    

Van equipment

   1,496,247   1,422,734   1,141,261 

Unsided/platform equipment

   558,530   521,891   458,550 

Less-than-truckload

   191,233   183,975   163,024 

Other truck transportation (1)

   320,790   300,710   206,305 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total truck transportation

   2,566,800   2,429,310   1,969,140 

Rail intermodal

   40,710   52,310   46,280 

Ocean and air cargo carriers

   41,850   41,450   31,900 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2,649,360   2,523,070   2,047,320 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loads hauled via BCO Independent Contractors included in total truck transportation

   1,027,480   1,039,630   945,210 

Revenue per load:

    

Truck transportation

    

Truckload:

    

Van equipment

  $2,601  $2,478  $1,921 

Unsided/platform equipment

   3,152   2,968   2,441 

Less-than-truckload

   745   639   598 

Other truck transportation (1)

   2,606   2,563   1,971 

Total truck transportation

   2,583   2,455   1,938 

Rail intermodal

   3,562   3,058   2,470 

Ocean and air cargo carriers

   13,357   7,893   4,144 

Revenue per load on loads hauled via BCO Independent Contractors

  $2,566  $2,513  $1,975 

Revenue by capacity type (as a % of total revenue):

    

Truck capacity providers:

    

BCO Independent Contractors

   35  40  45

Truck Brokerage Carriers

   54  51  47

Rail intermodal

   2  2  3

Ocean and air cargo carriers

   8  5  3

Other

   1  1  2

(1)

Includes power-only, expedited, straight truck, cargo van, and miscellaneous other truck transportation revenue generated by the transportation logistics segment. Power-only refers to shipments where the Company furnishes a power unit and an operator but not trailing equipment, which is typically provided by the shipper or consignee.

(2)

Includes primarily reinsurance premium revenue generated by the insurance segment and intra-Mexico transportation services revenue generated by Landstar Metro.

25


24

Table of Contents

Expenses

Purchased transportation

Also critical to the Company’s success is its ability to secure capacity, particularly truck capacity, at rates that allow the Company to profitably transport customers’ freight. The following table summarizes the number of available truck capacity providers as of the end of the three most recent fiscal years:

   
Dec. 26,

2020
   
Dec. 28,

2019
   
Dec. 29,

2018
 
BCO Independent Contractors
   10,242    9,554    9,884 
Truck Brokerage Carriers:
      
Approved and active
(1)
   46,053    39,497    41,069 
Other approved
   22,972    16,820    17,985 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   69,025    56,317    59,054 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total available truck capacity providers
   79,267    65,871    68,938 
  
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors
   10,991    10,243    10,599 

   Dec. 31,
2022
   Dec. 25,
2021
   Dec. 26,
2020
 

BCO Independent Contractors

   10,393    11,057    10,242 

Truck Brokerage Carriers:

      

Approved and active (1)

   66,745    64,476    46,053 

Other approved

   30,999    25,870    22,972 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   97,744    90,346    69,025 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total available truck capacity providers

   108,137    101,403    79,267 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors

   11,281    11,864    10,991 

(1)

Active refers to Truck Brokerage Carriers who moved at least one load in the 180 days immediately preceding the fiscal year end.

The Company incurs costs that are directly related to the transportation of freight that include purchased transportation and commissions to agents. The Company incurs indirect costs associated with the transportation of freight that include other operating costs and insurance and claims. In addition, the Company incurs selling, general and administrative costs essential to administering its business operations. Management continually monitors all components of the costs incurred by the Company and establishes annual cost budgets which, in general, are used to benchmark costs incurred on a monthly basis.

Purchased transportation represents the amount a BCO Independent Contractor or other third party capacity provider is paid to haul freight. The amount of purchased transportation paid to a BCO Independent Contractor is primarily based on a contractually agreed-upon percentage of revenue generated by loads hauled by the BCO Independent Contractor. Purchased transportation paid to a Truck Brokerage Carrier is based on either a negotiated rate for each load hauled or, to a lesser extent, a contractually agreed-upon fixed rate per load. Purchased transportation paid to railroads and ocean cargo carriers is based on either a negotiated rate for each load hauled or a contractually agreed-upon fixed rate per load. Purchased transportation paid to air cargo carriers is generally based on a negotiated rate for each load hauled and purchased transportation paid to ocean cargo carriers is generally based on contractually agreed-upon fixed rates per load.hauled. Purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue for truck brokerage, rail intermodal and ocean cargo services is normally higher than that of BCO Independent Contractor and air cargo services. Purchased transportation is the largest component of costs and expenses and, on a consolidated basis, increases or decreases as a percentage of consolidated revenue in proportion to changes in the percentage of consolidated revenue generated through BCO Independent Contractors and other third party capacity providers and external revenue from the insurance segment, consisting of reinsurance premiums. Purchased transportation as a percent of revenue also increases or decreases in relation to the availability of truck brokerage capacity and with changes in the price of fuel on revenue generated from shipments hauled by Truck Brokerage Carriers. The Company passes 100% of fuel surcharges billed to customers for freight hauled by BCO Independent Contractors to its BCO Independent Contractors. These fuel surcharges are excluded from revenue and the cost of purchased transportation. Purchased transportation costs are recognized over the freight transit period as the performance obligation to the customer is completed.

Commissions to agents

Commissions to agents are based on contractually agreed-upon percentages of (i) revenue, or net revenue, defined as(ii) revenue less the cost of purchased transportation, or net(iii) revenue less a contractually agreed upon percentage of revenue retained by Landstar.Landstar and the cost of purchased transportation (the “retention contracts”). Commissions to agents as a percentage of consolidated revenue will vary directly with fluctuations in the percentage of consolidated revenue generated by the various modes of transportation and reinsurance premiums and, in general, vary inversely with changes in net revenue margin, definedthe amount of purchased transportation as net revenue divided bya percentage of revenue on services provided by Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads, air cargo carriers and ocean cargo carriers. Commissions to agents are recognized over the freight transit period as the performance obligation to the customer is completed.

The Company defines gross profit as revenue less the cost

Other operating costs, net of purchased transportation and commissions to agents. Gross profit divided by revenue is referred to as gross profit margin. The Company’s operating margin is defined as operating income divided by gross profit.

In general, gross profit margingains on revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors represents a fixed percentage of revenue due to the nature of the contracts that pay a fixed percentage of revenue to both the BCO Independent Contractors and independent commission sales agents. For revenue generated by Truck Brokerage Carriers, gross profit margin is either fixed or variable as a percent of revenue, depending on the contract with each individual independent commission sales agent. Under certain contracts with independent commission sales agents, the Company retains a fixed percentage of revenue and the agent retains the amount remaining less the cost of purchased transportation (the “retention contracts”). Gross profit margin on revenue generated from shipments hauled
25

Table of Contents
by railroads, air cargo carriers, ocean cargo carriers and Truck Brokerage Carriers, other than those under retention contracts, is variable in nature as the Company’s contracts with independent commission sales agents provide commissions to agents at a contractually agreed upon percentage of net revenue for these types of shipments. Approximately 50% of the Company’s consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2020 was generated under contracts that have a fixed gross profit margin while 50% was under contracts that have a variable gross profit margin.
asset sales/dispositions

Maintenance costs for Company-provided trailing equipment and BCO Independent Contractor recruiting and qualification costs are the largest components of other operating costs. Also included in other operating costs are trailer rental costs, the provision for uncollectible advances and other receivables due from BCO Independent Contractors and independent commission sales agents and gains/losses, if any, on sales of Company-owned trailing equipment.

26


Insurance and claims

With respect to insurance and claims cost, potential liability associated with accidents in the trucking industry is severe and occurrences are unpredictable.

For periods prior to May 1, 2019, Landstar retains liability for commercial trucking claims up to $5 million per occurrence and maintains various third party insurance arrangements for liabilities in excess of its $5 million self-insured retention. Effective May 1, 2019, the Company entered into a new three year commercial auto liability insurance arrangement for losses incurred between $5,000,000$5 million and $10,000,000$10 million (the “Initial Excess Policy”) with a third party insurance company. The Company subsequently extended the Initial Excess Policy for one additional policy year, from May 1, 2022 through April 30, 2023. For commercial trucking claims incurred on or after May 1, 20192022 through April 30, 2022,2023, the extended Initial Excess Policy provides for a limit for a single loss of $5,000,000,$5 million, with ana remaining aggregate limit of $15,000,000$10 million for eachthe policy year, an aggregate limit of $20,000,000 for the

thirty-six
month term endedperiod ending April 30, 2022,2023, and optionsan option to increase such aggregate limitslimit for
a pre-established
amounts amount of additional premium. If aggregate losses under the Initial Excess Policy exceed either the annual aggregate limit or the aggregate limit for the three year period ending April 30, 2022,2023, and the Company did not elect to increase such aggregate limitslimit for a
pre-established
amount of additional premium, Landstarthe Company would retain liability of up to $10,000,000$10 million per occurrence, inclusive of its $5,000,000$5 million self-insured retention for commercial trucking claims during the remainder of the applicable policy year(s). Moreover, as a result of the Company’s aggregate loss experience since it entered into the Initial Excess Policy, the Initial Excess Policy required the Company to pay additional premium up to a
pre-established
maximum amount of $3,500,000, which was provided for in insurance and claims costs for the Company’s 2020 fiscal first quarter.
period ending April 30, 2023.

The Company also maintains third party insurance arrangements providing excess coverage for commercial trucking liabilities in excess of $10,000,000.$10 million. These third party arrangements provide coverage on a per occurrence or aggregated basis. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the occurrence of trials in courts throughout the United States involving catastrophic injury and fatality claims against commercial motor carriers that have resulted in verdicts in excess of $10 million. Within the transportation logistics industry, these verdicts are often referred to as “Nuclear Verdicts.” The increase in Nuclear Verdicts has had a significant impact on the cost of commercial auto liability claims throughout the United States. Due to the increasing cost of commercial auto liability claims, throughout the United States in recent years, the availability of such excess coverage has significantly decreased, and the pricing associated with such excess coverage, to the extent available, has significantly increased. Effective May 1, 2020Over the most recent three-year period, with respect to the annual policy year ending April 30, 2021,2023, as compared to the annual policy year ended April 30, 2020, the Company experienced an increase of approximately $14$20 million, or over 170%360%, in the premiums charged by third party insurance companies to the Company for excess coverage for commercial trucking liabilities in excess of $10,000,000.$10 million.

Moreover, in recent years the Company has increased the level of its financial exposure to commercial trucking claims in excess of $10 million, including through the use of additional self-insurance, deductibles, aggregate loss limits, quota shares and other arrangements with third party insurance companies, based on the availability of coverage within certain excess insurance coverage layers and estimated cost differentials between proposed premiums from third party insurance companies and historical and actuarially projected losses experienced by the Company at various levels of excess insurance coverage. For example, with respect to a hypothetical claim in the amount of $35 million incurred during the annual policy year ending April 30, 2023, the Company would have an aggregate financial exposure of approximately $10 million. Furthermore, the Company’s third party insurance arrangements provide excess coverage up to an uppermost coverage layer, in excess of which the Company retains additional financial exposure. No assurances can be given that the availability of excess coverage for commercial trucking claims will not continue to deteriorate, that the pricing associated with such excess coverage, to the extent available, will not continue to increase, nor that insurance coverage from third party insurers for excess coverage of commercial trucking claims will even be available on commercially reasonable terms at certain levels.

Moreover, the occurrence of a Nuclear Verdict, or the settlement of a catastrophic injury and/or fatality claim that could have otherwise resulted in a Nuclear Verdict, could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s cost of insurance and claims and its results of operations.

Further, the Company retains liability of up to $1,000,000 for each general liability claim, up to $250,000 for each workers’ compensation claim and up to $250,000 for each cargo claim. In addition, under reinsurance arrangements by Signature of certain risks of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors, the Company retains liability of up to $500,000, $1,000,000 or $2,000,000 with respect to certain occupational accident claims and up to $750,000 with respect to certain workers’ compensation claims. The Company’s exposure to liability associated with accidents incurred by Truck Brokerage Carriers, railroads and air and ocean cargo carriers who transport freight on behalf of the Company is reduced by various factors including the extent to which such carriers maintain their own insurance coverage. A material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, cargo claims or workers’ compensation claims or the material unfavorable development of existing claims could have a material adverse effect on Landstar’s cost of insurance and claims and its results of operations.

27


Selling, general and administrative

During the 20202022 fiscal year, employee compensation and benefits accounted for approximately

sixty-six
percent 67% of the Company’s selling, general and administrative costs.
Employee compensation and benefits include wages and employee benefit costs as well as incentive compensation and stock-based compensation expense. Incentive compensation and stock-based compensation expense is highly variable in nature in comparison to wages and employee benefit costs.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization primarily relate to depreciation of trailing equipment and information technology hardware and software.

26

Table

Costs of Contents

revenue

The following table sets forthCompany incurs costs of revenue related to the percentage relationshiptransportation of freight and, to a much lesser extent, to reinsurance premiums received by Signature. Costs of revenue include variable costs of revenue and other costs of revenue. Variable costs of revenue include purchased transportation and commissions to agents, both being directas these costs are entirely variable on a shipment-by-shipment basis. Other costs of revenue include fixed costs of revenue and semi-variable costs of revenue, where such costs may vary over time based on certain economic factors or operational metrics such as the number of Company-controlled trailers, the number of BCO Independent Contractors, the frequency and severity of insurance claims, the number of miles traveled by BCO Independent Contractors, or the number and/or scale of information technology projects in process or in-service to support revenue generating activities, rather than on a shipment-by-shipment basis. Other costs of revenue associated with the transportation of freight include: (i) other operating costs, primarily consisting of trailer maintenance and BCO Independent Contractor recruiting and qualification costs, as reported in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) transportation-related insurance premiums paid and claim costs incurred, included as a portion of insurance and claims in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) costs incurred related to internally developed software including ASC 350-40 amortization, implementation costs, hosting costs and other support costs utilized to support our independent commission sales agents, third party capacity providers, and customers, included as a portion of depreciation and amortization and of selling, general and administrative in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income; and (iv) depreciation on Company-owned trailing equipment, included as a portion of depreciation and amortization in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Other costs of revenue associated with reinsurance premiums received by Signature are comprised of broker commissions and other fees paid related to the administration of insurance programs to BCO Independent Contractors and are included in selling, general and administrative in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. In addition to costs of revenue, the Company incurs various other costs relating to its business, including most selling, general and administrative costs and portions of costs attributable to insurance and claims and depreciation and amortization. Management continually monitors all components of the costs incurred by the Company and establishes annual cost budgets that, in general, are used to benchmark costs incurred on a monthly basis.

Gross Profit, Variable Contribution, Gross Profit Margin and Variable Contribution Margin

The following table sets forth calculations of gross profit, defined as revenue less costs of revenue, and gross profit margin defined as gross profit divided by revenue, for the periods indicated. The Company refers to revenue less variable costs of revenue as “variable contribution” and indirectvariable contribution divided by revenue as “variable contribution margin”. Variable contribution and variable contribution margin are each non-GAAP financial measures. The closest comparable GAAP financial measures to variable contribution and variable contribution margin are, respectively, gross profit and gross profit margin. The Company believes variable contribution and variable contribution margin are useful measures of the variable costs that we incur at a shipment-by-shipment level attributable to our transportation network of third-party capacity providers and independent commission sales agents in order to provide services to our customers. The Company believes variable contribution and variable contribution margin are important performance measurements and management considers variable contribution and variable contribution margin in evaluating the Company’s financial performance and in its decision-making, such as budgeting for infrastructure, trailing equipment and selling, general and administrative costs.

28


The reconciliations of gross profit to variable contribution and gross profit margin to variable contribution margin are each presented below:

   Fiscal Year 
   2022  2021  2020 

Revenue

  $ 7,436,562  $ 6,537,568  $ 4,132,981 

Costs of revenue:

    

Purchased transportation

   5,804,017   5,114,667   3,192,850 

Commissions to agents

   614,865   507,209   340,780 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Variable costs of revenue

   6,418,882   5,621,876   3,533,630 

Trailing equipment depreciation

   36,653   35,204   34,892 

Information technology costs

   19,834   13,560   9,791 

Insurance-related costs (1)

   127,605   109,387   90,778 

Other operating costs

   45,192   36,531   30,463 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Other costs of revenue

   229,284   194,682   165,924 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total costs of revenue

   6,648,166   5,816,558   3,699,554 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit

  $788,396  $721,010  $433,427 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross profit margin

   10.6  11.0  10.5

Plus: other costs of revenue

   229,284   194,682   165,924 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Variable contribution

  $1,017,680  $915,692  $599,351 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Variable contribution margin

   13.7  14.0  14.5

(1)

Insurance-related costs in the table above include (i) other costs of revenue related to the transportation of freight that are included as a portion of insurance and claims in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income and (ii) certain other costs of revenue related to reinsurance premiums received by Signature that are included as a portion of selling, general and administrative in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. Insurance and claims costs included in other costs of revenue relating to the transportation of freight primarily consist of insurance premiums paid for commercial auto liability, general liability, cargo and other lines of coverage related to the transportation of freight and the related cost of claims incurred under those programs, and, to a lesser extent, the cost of claims incurred under insurance programs available to BCO Independent Contractors that are reinsured by Signature. Other insurance and claims costs included in costs of revenue that are included in selling, general and administrative in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income consist of brokerage commissions and other fees incurred by Signature relating to the administration of insurance programs available to BCO Independent Contractors that are reinsured by Signature.

In general, variable contribution margin on revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors represents a fixed percentage due to the nature of the contracts that pay a fixed percentage of revenue to both the BCO Independent Contractors and independent commission sales agents. For revenue generated by Truck Brokerage Carriers, variable contribution margin may be either a fixed or variable percentage, depending on the contract with each individual independent commission sales agent. Variable contribution margin on revenue generated from shipments hauled by railroads, air cargo carriers, ocean cargo carriers and Truck Brokerage Carriers, other than those under retention contracts, is variable in nature, as the Company’s contracts with independent commission sales agents provide commissions to agents at a contractually agreed upon percentage of the amount represented by revenue less purchased transportation for these types of shipments. Approximately 40% of the Company’s consolidated revenue in fiscal year 2022 was generated under transactions that pay a fixed percentage of revenue to the third party capacity provider and/or agents while 60% was generated under transactions that pay a variable percentage of revenue to the third party capacity provider and/or agents.

Operating income as a percentage of gross profit for the periods indicated:

   
Fiscal Years
 
   
2020
  
2019
  
2018
 
Revenue
   100.0  100.0  100.0
Purchased transportation
   77.3   76.6   77.4 
Commissions to agents
   8.2   8.4   8.2 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Gross profit margin
   14.5  15.1  14.5
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Gross profit
   100.0  100.0  100.0
Investment income
   0.6   0.8   0.6 
Indirect costs and expenses:
    
Other operating costs, net of gains on asset sales/dispositions
   5.1   6.1   4.8 
Insurance and claims
   14.6   13.1   11.3 
Selling, general and administrative
   28.0   25.9   28.2 
Depreciation and amortization
   7.7   7.2   6.5 
Impairment of intangible and other assets
   0.4   —     —   
Commission program termination costs
   2.6   —     —   
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total costs and expenses
   58.4   52.2   50.9 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Operating margin
   42.2  48.6  49.7
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
Management believes thatand operating income as a discussionpercentage of indirect costsvariable contribution

The following table presents operating income as a percentage of gross profit and operating income as a percentage of variable contribution. The Company’s operating income as a percentage of variable contribution is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as operating income divided by variable contribution. The Company believes that operating income as a percentage of variable contribution is useful and meaningful to investors for the following principal reasons: (1)(i) the variable costs of revenue for a significant portion of the business are highly influenced by short-term market-based trends in the freight transportation industry, whereas other costs, including other costs of revenue, are much less impacted by short-term freight market trends; (ii) disclosure of these relative measures (i.e., each indirect operating cost line item as a percentage of gross profit)this measure allows investors to better understand the underlying trends in the Company’s results of operations; (2) due to the generally fixed nature of these indirect costs (other than insurance and claims costs), these relative measures are(iii) this measure is meaningful to

29


investors’ evaluations of the Company’s management of its indirect costs attributable to operations; (3)operations other than the purely variable costs associated with purchased transportation and commissions to agents that the Company incurs to provide services to our customers; and (iv) management considers this financial information in its decision-making, such as budgeting for infrastructure, trailing equipment and selling, general and administrative costs;costs.                        

   Fiscal Year 
   2022  2021  2020 

Gross profit

  $788,396  $721,010  $433,427 

Operating income

  $571,083  $505,668  $252,950 

Operating income as % of gross profit

   72.4  70.1  58.4

Variable contribution

  $ 1,017,680  $ 915,692  $ 599,351 

Operating income

  $571,083  $505,668  $252,950 

Operating income as % of variable contribution

   56.1  55.2  42.2

The increases in operating income as a percentage of gross profit from fiscal year 2021 to fiscal year 2022 and (4) this information facilitates comparisons by investorsfrom fiscal year 2020 to fiscal year 2021 each resulted from operating income increasing at a more rapid percentage rate than the increase in gross profit, as the Company was able to scale our fixed cost infrastructure, primarily certain components of selling, general and administrative costs, across a larger gross profit base.

The increases in operating income as a percentage of variable contribution from fiscal year 2021 to fiscal year 2022 and fiscal year 2020 to fiscal year 2021 each resulted from operating income increasing at a more rapid percentage rate than the Company’s resultsincrease in variable contribution, as the Company was able to the resultsscale our fixed cost infrastructure, primarily certain components of other

non-asset
or asset-light companies in the transportationselling, general and logistics services industry who report “net revenue” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis, which representsadministrative costs, as well as certain components of our other costs of revenue, less the cost of purchased transportation. The difference between the Company’s use of the term “gross profit” and the use of the term “net revenue” by other companies in the transportation and logistics services industry is due to the direct cost of commissions to agents under the Landstar business model, whereas other companies in this industry generally have no commissions to agents.
across a larger variable contribution base.

Also, as previously mentioned, the Company reports two operating segments: the transportation logistics segment and the insurance segment. External revenue at the insurance segment, representing reinsurance premiums, has historically been relatively consistent on an annual basis at 2% or less of consolidated revenue and generally corresponds directly with the number of trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors. The discussion of indirect cost line items in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations considers the Company’s costs on a consolidated basis rather than on a segment basis. Management believes this presentation format is the most appropriate to assist users of the financial statements in understanding the Company’s business for the following reasons: (1) the insurance segment has no other operating costs; (2) discussion of insurance and claims at either segment without reference to the other may create confusion amongst investors and potential investors due to intercompany arrangements and specific deductible programs that affect comparability of financial results by segment between various fiscal periods but that have no effect on the Company from a consolidated reporting perspective; (3) selling, general and administrative costs of the insurance segment comprise less than 10% of consolidated selling, general and administrative costs and have historically been relatively consistent on a year-over-year basis; and (4) the insurance segment has no depreciation and amortization.

Fiscal Year Ended December��26, 2020December 31, 2022 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2019

25, 2021

Revenue for fiscal year 20202022 was $4,132,981,000,$7,436,562,000, an increase of $48,404,000,$898,994,000, or 1%14%, compared to fiscal year 2019.2021. Transportation revenue increased $48,183,000,$892,297,000, or 1%14%. The increase in transportation revenue was attributable to an increased revenue per load of approximately 3%, partially offset by a decreased8% and an increased number of loads hauled of approximately 2% in fiscal year 20205% compared to fiscal year 2019.2021. During the Company’s 2022 fiscal year, demand for the Company’s truck transportation services was at all-time high levels during the 2022 first quarter, as supply chains exhibited significant disruption. The macroeconomic environment subsequently began to slow and supply chain congestion began to ease as year-over-year revenue growth decelerated during the 2022 second and third quarters as compared to the 2021 second and third quarters before turning negative in the 2022 fourth quarter as compared to the 2021 fourth quarter. Reinsurance premiums were $56,462,000$78,554,000 and $56,241,000$71,857,000 for fiscal years 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively. The increase in revenue from reinsurance premiums was primarily attributable to (i) an increase in the aggregate value of equipment insured by BCO Independent Contractors under a physical damage program reinsured by Signature; (ii) participation levels among BCO Independent

30


27

Table

Contractors in certain occupational accident programs and workers’ compensation programs and (iii) an increase in the average number of Contents

trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors in fiscal year 2022 compared to fiscal year 2021. The Company’s fiscal year ends each year on the last Saturday in December and, as such, the Company’s fiscal year 2022 included fifty-three weeks of operations whereas fiscal year 2021 included fifty-two weeks of operations.

Truck transportation revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors and Truck Brokerage Carriers (together, the “third party truck capacity providers”) for fiscal year 20202022 was $3,815,781,000,$6,630,839,000, representing 92%89% of total revenue, an increase of $50,452,000,$667,621,000, or 1%11%, compared to fiscal year 2019. Revenue2021. The number of loads hauled by third party truck capacity providers increased approximately 6% in fiscal year 2022 compared to fiscal year 2021, and revenue per load on loads hauled by third party truck capacity providers increased approximately 3% in fiscal year 20205% compared to fiscal year 2019, while2021.

The increase in the number of loads hauled by third partyvia truck capacity providers decreased approximately 2% in fiscal year 2020 compared to fiscal year 2019.

2021 was due to a broad-based increase in demand for the Company’s truck transportation services during fiscal year 2022. Loads hauled via van equipment increased 5%, loads hauled via unsided/platform equipment increased 7%, less-than-truckload loadings increased 4% and loads hauled via other truck transportation services increased 7% as compared to fiscal year 2021. The year-over-year growth in the number of loads hauled via truck peaked in the 2022 first quarter, decelerated throughout the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2022, and turned negative in the 2022 fourth fiscal quarter. The number of loads hauled via truck were 20%, 10% and 1% above the corresponding period of 2021 in the first, second and third fiscal quarters, respectively. The number of loads hauled via truck during the 2022 fourth fiscal quarter was 6% below the 2021 fourth fiscal quarter, despite the extra week of operations in the 2022 fourth fiscal quarter.

The increase in revenue per load on loads hauled via truck was entirely due to a comparatively tighter market for van truckloadtight truck capacity environment experienced during fiscal year 2022, in particular during the second halffirst fiscal quarter of 2020. The decrease infiscal year 2022, and the numberimpact of higher diesel fuel costs on loads hauled via truckTruck Brokerage Carrier, partially offset by a decreased average length of haul during fiscal year 2022. As compared to fiscal year 2019 was due to the unfavorable impact of the

COVID-19
pandemic on demand for the Company’s truck transportation services at the onset of the pandemic and the relative softness in the U.S. manufacturing sector in the 2020 period compared to the 2019 period, mostly offset by consumer driven demand for van services that began
mid-summer
2020. The increasingly tight market for van truckload capacity during the 2020 second half was attributable to strong demand for
e-commerce,
foodstuffs, building products and other consumer durables.
During the 2020 fiscal year compared to the 2019 fiscal year,2021, revenue per load on loads hauled via van equipment increased 8%5%, reflectingon loads hauled via unsided/platform equipment increased consumer demand, while6%, on less-than-truckload loadings increased 17% and on loads hauled by other truck transportation services increased 2%. The year-over-year growth in revenue per load on loads hauled via unsided/platform equipment decreased 2%, reflecting softnesstruck decelerated throughout fiscal year 2022, before turning negative in the U.S. manufacturing sector. Also adversely impacting revenue2022 fourth fiscal quarter. Revenue per load on loads hauled via unsided/platform equipmenttruck was a decrease in revenue per load on heavy specialized loadings of22% and 10% above prior year in the 2020first and second fiscal yearquarters, respectively; essentially flat in the 2022 third quarter as compared to the 2019 fiscal year. Additionally, revenue per load on less-than-truckload loadings decreased 5% from fiscal2021 third quarter, and 7% below the prior year 2019 to fiscal year 2020.
During fiscal year 2020 as compared to fiscal year 2019, loads hauled via van equipment decreased 1% and loads hauled via unsided/platform equipment decreased 5%, for similar reasons as described above with respect to the overall decrease in the number of loads hauled via truck in2022 fourth fiscal year 2020 compared to fiscal year 2019. Less-than-truckload volumes increased 5% in fiscal year 2020 compared to fiscal year 2019.
quarter.

Fuel surcharges billed to customers on revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors are excluded from revenue. Fuel surcharges on Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue identified separately in billings to customers and included as a component of Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue were $60,118,000$211,770,000 and $79,486,000$107,776,000 in fiscal years 20202022 and 2019,2021, respectively. It should be noted that billings to many customers of the Company’s truck brokerage services include a single

all-in
rate that does not separately identify fuel surcharges on loads hauled via Truck Brokerage Carriers. Accordingly, the overall impact of changes in fuel prices on revenue and revenue per load on loads hauled via truck is likely to be greater than that indicated.

Transportation revenue generated by rail intermodal, air cargo and ocean cargo carriers (collectively, the “multimode capacity providers”) for fiscal year 20202022 was $246,493,000,$704,003,000, or 6%9% of total revenue, an increase of $6,703,000,$216,869,000, or 3%45%, compared to fiscal year 2019.2021. Revenue per load on revenue generated by multimode capacity providers increased approximately 2%64% in fiscal year 2022 compared to fiscal year 2021, while the number of loads hauled by multimode capacity providers decreased approximately 12% over the same period. Revenue per load on loads hauled by multimode capacity providers increased for all modes. Revenue per load on loads hauled via air, ocean and rail intermodal increased 118%, 56% and 16%, respectively, during fiscal year 2022 as compared to fiscal year 2021. The increase in revenue per load on loads hauled via air cargo carriers and ocean cargo carriers, in particular, was primarily related to ongoing disruptions in domestic and global supply chains and strong consumer demand. Revenue per load on revenue generated by multimode capacity providers is influenced by many factors, including revenue mix among the various modes of transportation used, length of haul, complexity of freight, density of freight lanes, fuel costs and availability of capacity. The decrease in the number of loads hauled by multimode capacity providers was due to a 22% decrease in rail loadings and a 13% decrease in air loadings, partially offset by a 7% increase in ocean loadings. The 22% decrease in rail loadings was broad-based across several agencies and customers, and the 13% decrease in air loadings was entirely attributable to decreased loadings at one specific customer. The 7% increase in ocean loadings was due to a broad-based increase in demand across many customers for the Company’s ocean services.

Purchased transportation was 78.0% and 78.2% of revenue in fiscal years 2022 and 2021, respectively. The decrease in purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to a decreased rate of purchased transportation on revenue generated by Truck Brokerage Carriers, partially offset by (i) an increased percentage of revenue generated by Truck Brokerage Carriers, which

31


typically has a higher rate of purchased transportation than revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors and (ii) an increased percentage of revenue generated by multimode capacity providers, which typically has a higher rate of purchased transportation than third party truck capacity providers. Commissions to agents were 8.3% and 7.8% of revenue in fiscal years 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase in commissions to agents as a percentage of revenue was primarily attributable to a decreased cost of purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue on revenue generated by Truck Brokerage Carriers during fiscal year 2022.

Investment income was $3,162,000 and $2,857,000 in fiscal years 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase in investment income was primarily attributable to higher average rates of return on investments during fiscal year 2022, partially offset by a lower average investment balance held by the insurance segment during fiscal year 2022.

Other operating costs increased $8,661,000 in fiscal year 2022 compared to fiscal year 2021. The increase in other operating costs compared to the prior year was primarily due to (i) increased trailing equipment maintenance costs as a result of (x) increased labor and parts costs charged by the Company’s network of third party trailer maintenance facilities; and (y) an increased average trailer fleet size during fiscal year 2022 and (ii) an increased provision for contractor bad debt, partially offset by increased gains on sales of operating property.

Insurance and claims increased $20,372,000 in fiscal year 2022 compared to fiscal year 2021. The increase in insurance and claims expense compared to the prior year was primarily due to increased severity of current year trucking claims during fiscal year 2022, increased insurance premiums, primarily for commercial auto and excess liability coverage, and increased net unfavorable development of prior years’ claims in the 2022 fiscal year. During fiscal years 2022 and 2021, insurance and claims costs included $11,331,000 and $9,708,000 of net unfavorable adjustments to prior years’ claims estimates, respectively.

Selling, general and administrative costs were essentially the same in fiscal year 2022 as compared to fiscal year 2021. In the 2022 fiscal year as compared to the 2021 fiscal year, the Company experienced increased wages, an increased provision for customer bad debt, increased travel and entertainment costs and the return of the Company’s annual agent convention held in April 2022. These increases were offset by decreased stock-based compensation expense and a decreased provision for incentive compensation. Included in selling, general and administrative costs was stock-based compensation expense of $12,399,000 and $27,537,000 for fiscal years 2022 and 2021, respectively, and incentive compensation expense of $16,507,000 and $29,361,000 for fiscal years 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization increased $7,844,000 in fiscal year 2022 compared to fiscal year 2021. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to increased depreciation on new and updated digital tools deployed for use by the Company’s network of agents, capacity providers and employees, and to a lesser extent, in connection with increased trailing equipment depreciation.

Interest and debt expense in fiscal year 2022 decreased $356,000 compared to fiscal year 2021. The decrease in interest and debt expense was primarily attributable to increased interest income earned on cash balances held by the transportation logistics segment, partially offset by increased average borrowings on the Company’s revolving credit facility during fiscal year 2022, as the Company had no borrowings under its revolving credit facility during the 2021 period, and increased interest expense related to finance lease obligations. The Company had no borrowings under its revolving credit facility as of the end of fiscal year 2022.

The provisions for income taxes for fiscal years 2022 and 2021 were based on estimated annual effective income tax rates of 24.5% and 24.4%, respectively, adjusted for discrete events, such as benefits resulting from stock-based awards. The actual effective income tax rate for fiscal year 2022 was 24.1%, which was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate of 21%, primarily attributable to state taxes and nondeductible executive compensation, partially offset by excess tax benefits realized on stock-based awards. The actual effective income tax rate for fiscal year 2021 was 24.0%, higher than the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% primarily due to state taxes and nondeductible executive compensation, partially offset by excess tax benefits realized on stock-based awards. The actual effective income tax rate in fiscal year 2022 of 24.1% was lower than the estimated annual effective income tax rate of 24.5%, primarily due to excess tax benefits recognized on stock-based awards in fiscal year 2022. The actual effective income tax rate in fiscal year 2021 of 24.0% was lower than the 24.4% estimated annual effective income tax rate primarily due to excess tax benefits recognized on stock-based compensation arrangements in fiscal year 2021.

Net income was $430,914,000, or $11.76 per diluted share, in fiscal year 2022. Net income was $381,524,000, or $9.98 per diluted share, in fiscal year 2021.

32


Fiscal Year Ended December 25, 2021 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 26, 2020

Revenue for fiscal year 2021 was $6,537,568,000, an increase of $2,404,587,000, or 58%, compared to fiscal year 2020. Transportation revenue increased $2,389,192,000, or 59%. The increase in transportation revenue was attributable to increased revenue per load of approximately 29% and an increased number of loads hauled of approximately 23% compared to fiscal year 2020. The significant increase in revenue in 2021 from 2020 was primarily related to two factors: (1) consumer demand for durable goods and e-commerce drove revenue during the 2021 period to record levels; and (2) ongoing supply chain disruptions in connection with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. economy. In particular, the adverse impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on demand for the Company’s truck transportation services significantly accelerated during the last week of the Company’s 2020 first fiscal quarter. However, following the demand lows experienced by the Company in April and May 2020, demand for the Company’s truck transportation services sequentially increased throughout the remainder of the 2020 fiscal year and significantly accelerated in fiscal year 2021. This significant, rapid decrease in demand early in the pandemic was followed by a substantially longer and greater sequential increase in demand that was unprecedented in the history of the Company. Reinsurance premiums were $71,857,000 and $56,462,000 for fiscal years 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in revenue from reinsurance premiums was primarily attributable to increased premiums from a third party insurance company relating to unladen insurance provided to certain BCO Independent Contractors and an increase in the average number of trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors in fiscal year 2021 compared to the 2019 fiscal year 2020.

Truck transportation revenue generated by third party truck capacity providers for fiscal year 2021 was $5,963,218,000, representing 91% of total revenue, an increase of $2,147,437,000, or 56%, compared to fiscal year 2020. Revenue per load on loads hauled by third party truck capacity providers increased approximately 27% compared to fiscal year 2020, and the number of loads hauled by third party truck capacity providers increased approximately 23% over the same period.

The increase in revenue per load on loads hauled via truck was primarily due to an extremely tight truck capacity environment experienced during fiscal year 2021. During fiscal year 2021, the demand for truck capacity, particularly with respect to van capacity, increased more rapidly than the supply of available truck capacity in the marketplace as the U.S. economy recovered from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic coupled with the impact of domestic supply chain disruptions. Revenue per load on loads hauled via van equipment increased 29%, revenue per load on loads hauled via unsided/platform equipment increased 22%, revenue per load on less-than-truckload loadings increased 7% and revenue per load on loads hauled via other truck transportation increased 30% as compared to fiscal year 2020.

The increase in the number of loads hauled via truck compared to fiscal year 2020 was due to a broad-based increase in demand for the Company’s truck transportation services during fiscal year 2021, particularly those services provided via van equipment and other truck transportation loadings, primarily power-only, compared to fiscal year 2020. Loads hauled via van equipment increased 25%, loads hauled via unsided/platform equipment increased 14%, loads hauled via less-than-truckload increased 13% and loads hauled via other truck transportation increased 46% as compared to fiscal year 2020.

Fuel surcharges billed to customers on revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors are excluded from revenue. Fuel surcharges on Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue identified separately in billings to customers and included as a component of Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue were $107,776,000 and $60,118,000 in fiscal years 2021 and 2020, respectively. It should be noted that billings to many customers of the Company’s truck brokerage services include a single all-in rate that does not separately identify fuel surcharges on loads hauled via Truck Brokerage Carriers. Accordingly, the overall impact of changes in fuel prices on revenue and revenue per load on loads hauled via truck is likely to be greater than that indicated.

Transportation revenue generated by multimode capacity providers for fiscal year 2021 was $487,134,000, or 7% of total revenue, an increase of $240,641,000, or 98%, compared to fiscal year 2020. Revenue per load on revenue generated by multimode capacity providers increased approximately 65% in fiscal year 2021 compared to fiscal year 2020, and the number of loads hauled by multimode capacity providers increased approximately 1%20% over the same period. The increase in revenueRevenue per load of 2% on loads hauled by multimode capacity providers wasincreased for all modes, primarily attributabledue to increased revenuestrong U.S. and global economic recoveries coupled with the impact of global supply chain disruptions which were particularly acute with respect to international ocean and air freight. Revenue per load on loads hauled via ocean, shipments.air and rail intermodal increased 86%, 54% and 24%, respectively, during fiscal year 2021 as compared to fiscal year 2020. Revenue per load on revenue generated by multimode capacity providers is influenced by many factors, including revenue mix among the various modes of transportation used, length of haul, complexity of freight, density of freight lanes, fuel costs and availability of capacity. The increase in the number of loads hauled by multimode capacity providers was primarily due to a 14%broad-based increase in demand across many customers for the Company’s rail, air loadings, primarily attributable to increased loadings at two specific agencies.and ocean service offerings during fiscal year 2021.

33


Purchased transportation was 77.3%78.2% and 76.6%77.3% of revenue in fiscal years 20202021 and 2019,2020, respectively. The increase in purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to an increased percentage of revenue contributed by Truck Brokerage Carriers, which typically has a higher rate of purchased transportation than revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors, and an increased rate of purchased transportation on revenue generated by Truck Brokerage Carriers, partially offset by a decreased rate of purchased transportation paid on Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors due to (i) an increased percentage of revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors who use Landstar-owned trailers and

(ii) the impact of COVID-19
pandemic relief incentive payments made to BCO Independent Contractors.in fiscal year 2020. Under the pandemic reliefthat program, for each load delivered by a BCO Independent Contractor with a confirmed delivery date from April 1, 2020 through May 30, 2020, the Company paid each of the BCO Independent Contractor who hauled the load and the independent commission sales agent who dispatched the load an extra $50. Commissions to agents were 8.2%7.8% and 8.4%8.2% of revenue in fiscal years 2021 and 2020, and 2019, respectively. CommissionsThe decrease in commissions to agents on Truck Brokerage Carrieras a percentage of revenue were lowerwas primarily attributable to an increased cost of purchased transportation as compared to the 2019 fiscal year due to the impacta percentage of a decreased net revenue margin on revenue generated by Truck Brokerage Carriers whereas commissions to agentsand a decreased commission rate paid on revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractor revenue were higher duringContractors due to the elimination as of the end of the 2020 fiscal year dueof certain incentive commission arrangements formerly paid to agents relating to a discontinued BCO recruitment and retention program and the impact of
the COVID-19
pandemic relief incentive payments.payments to agents included in fiscal year 2020. The Company paid a total of $12,593,000 in
COVID-19
pandemic relief incentive payments to BCO Independent Contractors and independent commission sales agents in April and Mayduring fiscal year 2020.

Investment income was $3,399,000$2,857,000 and $5,041,000$3,399,000 in fiscal years 20202021 and 2019,2020, respectively. The decrease in investment income was primarily attributable to lower average rates of return on investments during fiscal year 2020,2021, partially offset by a slightly higher average investment balance held by the insurance segment during fiscal year 2020.

28

2021.

Other operating costs decreased $6,811,000increased $6,068,000 in fiscal year 20202021 compared to fiscal year 2019 and represented 5.1% of gross profit in fiscal year 2020 compared to 6.1% in fiscal year 2019.2020. The decreaseincrease in other operating costs compared to the prior year was primarily due to aincreased trailing equipment maintenance costs, increased BCO recruiting and qualification costs, decreased provision for contractor bad debt,gains on sales of used trailing equipment, the impact of the cancellationresumption of an event for the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors due to the

COVID-19
pandemic, increased gains on the sales of used trailing equipment, decreased trailer rental costs and decreased BCO recruiting and
on-boarding
coststhat was cancelled in 2020 due to the impactCOVID-19 pandemic and increased payments of the
up to $2,000 made to BCO Independent Contractors who tested positive for COVID-19
pandemic. The decrease in other operating costs as a percentage and were placed out of gross profit was caused by the decrease in other operating costs, partially offset by the effect of decreased gross profit.
service.

Insurance and claims increased $7,454,000$17,690,000 in fiscal year 20202021 compared to fiscal year 2019 and represented 14.6% of gross profit in fiscal year 2020 compared to 13.1% in fiscal year 2019.2020. The increase in insurance and claims expense compared to the prior year was primarily due to an increase in insurance premiums, primarily for commercial trucking liability coverage, in fiscal year 2021, increased severity of current year trucking claims during the 2021 period and an increase in BCO miles traveled in fiscal year 2021, partially offset by a $5,000,000 charge for the Company’s self-insured retention with respect to a tragic vehicular accident involving a fatality during fiscal year 2020 and a $3,500,000 charge relating to additional premium the Company paidwas required to pay under the Initial Excess Policy in connection with certain aggregated losses increased insurance premiums incurred for commercial trucking liability coverage following the Company’s May 1, 2020 insurance renewal and increased severity of currentduring fiscal year claims, partially offset by decreased net unfavorable development of prior years’ claims in the 2020 period.2020. During fiscal years 20202021 and 2019,2020, insurance and claims costs included $9,196,000$9,708,000 and $16,679,000$9,196,000 of net unfavorable adjustments to prior years’ claims estimates, respectively. The increase in insurance and claims as a percentage of gross profit was caused by the increase in insurance and claims costs and the effect of decreased gross profit.

Selling, general and administrative costs increased $8,680,000$53,645,000 in fiscal year 20202021 compared to fiscal year 2019 and represented 28.0% of gross profit in fiscal year 2020 compared to 25.9% of gross profit in fiscal year 2019.2020. The increase in selling, general and administrative costs compared to prior year was attributable to increased stock-based compensation expense, an increased provision for incentive compensation and increased information technology costs and an increasedwages, partially offset by a decreased provision for customer bad debt, partially offset by decreased travel and entertainment costs related to the impact of the

COVID-19
pandemic and decreased agent convention costs.debt. Included in selling, general and administrative costs was stock-based compensation expense of $27,537,000 and $4,639,000 for fiscal years 2021 and 2020, respectively, and incentive compensation expense of $29,361,000 and $7,841,000 and $1,517,000 for the 2020 and 2019 fiscal years respectively. The increase in selling, general2021 and administrative costs as a percentage of gross profit was due to the increase in selling, general and administrative costs and the effect of decreased gross profit.
2020, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization increased $1,387,000$3,754,000 in fiscal year 20202021 compared to fiscal year 2019 and represented 7.7% of gross profit in fiscal year 2020 compared to 7.2% of gross profit in fiscal year 2019.2020. The increase in depreciation and amortization expenses was primarily due to increased depreciation on information technology assets, partially offset by a decrease in trailing equipment depreciation. The increase in depreciation and amortization as a percentage of gross profit was due to increased depreciation and the effect of decreased gross profit.

assets.

During the 2020 second fiscal quarter, the Company recorded a

non-cash
impairment charge of $2,582,000 representing 0.4% of gross profit, in respect of certain assets, primarily customer contract and related customer relationship intangible assets, acquired on September 20, 2017, along with substantially all of the other assets of the asset-light transportation logistics business of Fletes Avella, S.A. de C.V. (“Fletes Avella”). As previously disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q
for the 2020 first quarter, negative macroeconomic trends in Mexico caused significant disruptions in the Mexican economy. Accordingly, management performed impairment tests of the carrying values of certain assets that primarily relate to intra-Mexico business acquired as a part of the Fletes Avella acquisition. The impairment tests resulted in an impairment charge of $2,582,000, as the negative macroeconomic trends in Mexico resulted in updated financial projections relating to these intangible assets to be substantially below those originally anticipated at the acquisition date. There was no corresponding goodwill impairment charge recorded as the fair value of the Company’s Mexico and cross-border reporting unit continuescontinued to significantly exceed its carrying value as of December 26, 2020.

During the 2020 fourth fiscal quarter, the Company recorded commission program termination costs of $15,494,000 representing 2.6% of gross profit, related to buyouts of certain incentive commission arrangements with several of its independent sales agents due to the Company’s discontinuation of a truck owner-operator recruitment and retention program formerly involving those agents.

34


Interest and debt expense in fiscal year 20202021 increased $812,000$23,000 compared to fiscal year 2019. The increase in interest and debt expense was primarily attributable to decreased interest income earned on cash balances held by the transportation logistics segment.

2020.

The provisions for income taxes for both the 2020 and 2019 fiscal years 2021 and 2020 were based on estimated annual effective income tax rates of 24.4% and 24.2%, respectively, adjusted for discrete events, such as benefits resulting from stock-based awards. The increase in the estimated annual effective income tax rate was primarily attributable to an increased provision for nondeductible executive compensation during the 2021 period. The actual effective income tax rate for fiscal year 2021 was 24.0%, which was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% primarily attributable to state taxes and nondeductible executive compensation, partially offset by excess tax benefits realized on stock-based awards. The actual effective income tax rate for fiscal year 2020 was 22.8%, which was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate of 21%, primarily attributable to state taxes

29

and the meals and entertainment exclusion, partially offset by excess tax benefits realized on stock-based awards, the favorable resolution of certain tax matters during the 2020 fiscal year and state tax refunds. The actual effective income tax rate forin fiscal year 20192021 of 24.0% was 23.0%, which was higherlower than the statutory federal24.4% estimated annual effective income tax rate of 21% primarily attributabledue to state taxes and the meals and entertainment exclusion, partially offset by excess tax benefits realizedrecognized on stock-based awards.compensation arrangements in fiscal year 2021. The effective income tax rate in the 2020 fiscal year 2020 of 22.8% was lower than the 24.2% estimated annual effective income tax rate primarily due to excess tax benefits recognized on stock-based compensation arrangements, the favorable resolution of certain tax matters during the 2020 fiscal year and state tax refunds in the 2020 fiscal year. The effective

Net income tax ratewas $381,524,000, or $9.98 per diluted share, in the 2019 fiscal year of 23.0% was lower than the 24.2% estimated effective income tax rate primarily due to excess tax benefits recognized on stock-based compensation arrangements in the 2019 fiscal year.

2021. Net income was $192,106,000, or $4.98 per commondiluted share, ($4.98 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2020. Net income attributable to the Company was $227,720,000, or $5.72 per common share ($5.72 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2019. Net income during fiscal year 2020 was unfavorably impacted by $15,494,000, or $0.31 per commondiluted share, ($0.31 per diluted share) related to a
one-time
cost to buyout certain incentive commission arrangements with several agents, $12,593,000, or $0.25 per commondiluted share, ($0.25 per diluted share) related to the impact of the
COVID-19
pandemic relief incentive payments and $2,582,000, or $0.05 per commondiluted share, ($0.05 per diluted share) of
non-cash
impairment charges related to certain assets, primarily customer contract and related customer relationship intangible assets of the Company’s Mexico subsidiaries.
Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2019 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2018
Revenue for fiscal year 2019 was $4,084,577,000, a decrease of $530,567,000, or 11%, compared to fiscal year 2018. Transportation revenue decreased $534,460,000, or 12%. The decrease in transportation revenue was attributable to decreased revenue per load of approximately 9% and a decreased number of loads hauled of approximately 3% in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018. Reinsurance premiums were $56,241,000 and $52,348,000 for fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase in revenue from reinsurance premiums was primarily attributable to the increase in the average number of trucks provided by BCO Independent Contractors and an increase in the aggregate value of equipment insured by BCO Independent Contractors under a physical damage program reinsured by Signature in the 2019 fiscal year compared to the 2018 fiscal year.
Truck transportation revenue generated by third party truck capacity providers for fiscal year 2019 was $3,765,329,000, representing 92% of total revenue, a decrease of $515,083,000, or 12%, compared to fiscal year 2018. Revenue per load on loads hauled by third party truck capacity providers decreased approximately 10% in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018, and the number of loads hauled by third party truck capacity providers decreased approximately 3% in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018. The decrease in revenue per load on loads hauled via truck was primarily due to a softer freight demand environment experienced during the 2019 fiscal year, which resulted in more readily available truck capacity as compared to the 2018 fiscal year. Revenue per load on loads hauled via van equipment decreased 11%, revenue per load on loads hauled via unsided/platform equipment decreased 6% and revenue per load on less-than-truckload loadings decreased 10% as compared to the 2018 fiscal year. The decrease in the number of loads hauled via truck compared to fiscal year 2018 was primarily attributable to a decrease in demand for the Company’s truckload services provided via van equipment. Fuel surcharges billed to customers on revenue generated by BCO Independent Contractors are excluded from revenue. Fuel surcharges on Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue identified separately in billings to customers and included as a component of Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue were $79,486,000 and $101,346,000 in fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. It should be noted that billings to many customers of the Company’s truck brokerage services include a single
all-in
rate that does not separately identify fuel surcharges on loads hauled via Truck Brokerage Carriers. Accordingly, the overall impact of changes in fuel prices on revenue and revenue per load on loads hauled via truck is likely to be greater than that indicated.
Transportation revenue generated by multimode capacity providers for fiscal year 2019 was $239,790,000, or 6% of total revenue, a decrease of $23,763,000, or 9%, compared to fiscal year 2018. The number of loads hauled by multimode capacity providers decreased approximately 5% in the 2019 fiscal year compared to the 2018 fiscal year, and revenue per load on revenue generated by multimode capacity providers decreased approximately 4% over the same period. The decrease in the number of loads hauled by multimode capacity providers was primarily due to a 10% decrease in rail intermodal loadings, mostly attributable to decreased loadings at three specific agencies. The decrease in revenue per load of 4% on loads hauled by multimode capacity providers was primarily attributable to decreased revenue per load on air loadings due to the impact of air loadings provided in support of disaster relief efforts during fiscal year 2018. Also, revenue per load on revenue generated by multimode capacity providers is influenced by many factors, including revenue mix among the various modes of transportation used, length of haul, complexity of freight, density of freight lanes, fuel costs and availability of capacity.
30

Purchased transportation was 76.6% and 77.4% of revenue in fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. The decrease in purchased transportation as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to a decreased rate of purchased transportation paid on Truck Brokerage Carrier revenue and an increased percentage of revenue contributed by BCO Independent Contractors. Commissions to agents were 8.4% and 8.2% of revenue in fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase in commissions to agents as a percentage of revenue was primarily attributable to an increased net revenue margin on revenue generated by Truck Brokerage Carriers.
Investment income was $5,041,000 and $3,816,000 in fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase in investment income was primarily attributable to higher average rates of return on investments and a higher average investment balance held by the insurance segment during fiscal year 2019.
Other operating costs increased $5,471,000 in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018 and represented 6.1% of gross profit in fiscal year 2019 compared to 4.8% in fiscal year 2018. The increase in other operating costs compared to the prior fiscal year was primarily due to increased trailing equipment maintenance costs as a result of an increased number of Company-owned trailers and an increased provision for contractor bad debt. The increase in other operating costs as a percentage of gross profit was caused by the increase in other operating costs and the effect of decreased gross profit.
Insurance and claims increased $4,642,000 in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018 and represented 13.1% of gross profit in fiscal year 2019 compared to 11.3% in fiscal year 2018. The increase in insurance and claims expense compared to the prior fiscal year was primarily due to increased net unfavorable development of prior years’ claims and increased severity of current year claims in the BCO programs reinsured by Signature. Net unfavorable development of prior years’ claims was $16,679,000 and $13,960,000 in fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase in insurance and claims as a percentage of gross profit was caused by the increase in insurance and claims costs and the effect of decreased gross profit.
Selling, general and administrative costs decreased $29,259,000 in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018 and represented 25.9% of gross profit in fiscal year 2019 compared to 28.2% of gross profit in fiscal year 2018. The decrease in selling, general and administrative costs compared to prior fiscal year was attributable to a decreased provision for incentive compensation and decreased stock-based compensation expense, partially offset by increased wages. Included in selling, general and administrative costs was incentive compensation expense of $1,517,000 and $19,210,000 for the 2019 and 2018 fiscal years, respectively, and stock-based compensation expense of $4,236,000 and $18,256,000 for the 2019 and 2018 fiscal years, respectively. The decrease in selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of gross profit was due to the decrease in selling, general and administrative costs, partially offset by the effect of decreased gross profit.
Depreciation and amortization increased $898,000 in fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018 and represented 7.2% of gross profit in fiscal year 2019 compared to 6.5% of gross profit in fiscal year 2018. The increase in depreciation and amortization expenses was primarily due to increased depreciation on information technology assets. The increase in depreciation and amortization as a percentage of gross profit was due to the effect of decreased gross profit and increased depreciation costs.
Interest and debt expense in fiscal year 2019 decreased $213,000 compared to fiscal year 2018. The decrease in interest and debt expense was primarily attributable to increased interest income earned on cash balances held by the transportation logistics segment.
The provisions for income taxes for the 2019 and 2018 fiscal years were based on estimated annual effective income tax rates of 24.2% and 24.5%, respectively, adjusted for discrete events, such as benefits resulting from stock-based awards. The actual effective income tax rate for fiscal year 2019 was 23.0%, which was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% primarily attributable to state taxes and the meals and entertainment exclusion, partially offset by excess tax benefits realized on stock-based awards. The actual effective income tax rate for fiscal year 2018 was 22.3%, which was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% primarily attributable to state taxes, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s (the “Tax Reform Act”) elimination of the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m) and the meals and entertainment exclusion. The effective income tax rate in the 2019 fiscal year of 23.0% was lower than the 24.2% estimated effective income tax rate primarily due to excess tax benefits recognized on stock-based compensation arrangements in the 2019 fiscal year. The effective income tax rate in the 2018 fiscal year of 22.3% was lower than the 24.5% estimated annual effective income tax rate primarily due to excess tax benefits recognized on stock-based compensation arrangements in the 2018 fiscal year, favorable adjustments recognized during the 2018 fiscal year relating to federal domestic production activities deductions and research and development credits and the favorable resolution of certain tax matters during the 2018 fiscal year.
The net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest of $17,000 and $68,000 in the 2019 and 2018 fiscal years, respectively, represents the former noncontrolling investors’ share of the net loss incurred by Landstar Metro and Landstar Servicios.
31

Net income attributable to the Company was $227,720,000, or $5.72 per common share ($5.72 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2019. Net income attributable to the Company was $255,281,000, or $6.19 per common share ($6.18 per diluted share), in fiscal year 2018.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Working capital and the ratio of current assets to current liabilities were $561,255,000 and 1.6 to 1, respectively, at December 31, 2022, compared with $512,917,000 and 1.5 to 1, respectively, at December 25, 2021, and $402,038,000 and 1.5 to 1, respectively, at December 26, 2020, compared with $444,984,000 and 1.8 to 1, respectively, at December 28, 2019, and $435,611,000 and 1.8 to 1, respectively, at December 29, 2018.2020. Landstar has historically operated with current ratios within the range of 1.5 to 1 to 2.0 to 1. Cash provided by operating activities was $210,717,000, $307,840,000,$622,659,000, $276,740,000, and $297,901,000$210,717,000 in fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The decrease in cash flow provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2020 was primarily attributable to the increase in trade and other accounts receivable as of the end of the 2020 fiscal year as compared to as of the end of the 2019 fiscal year driven by the significant growth in revenue during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020. The increase in cash flow provided by operating activities for fiscal year 20192022 was primarily attributable to favorable net working capital impacts in connection with the timing of collections of trade receivables.

receivables and payment of certain payables and increased net income. The increase in cash flow provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2021 was primarily attributable to increased net income, partially offset by the 58% increase in revenue year-over-year, which increased net receivables, defined as accounts receivable less accounts payable.

The Company declared and paid $1.10 per share, or $40,284,000 in the aggregate, in cash dividends during fiscal year 2022. During fiscal year 2022, the Company also paid $75,387,000 of dividends payable which were declared during fiscal year 2021 and included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 25, 2021. In addition, on December 6, 2022, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $2.00 per share, or $71,854,000 in the aggregate, payable on January 20, 2023 to stockholders of record of its Common Stock as of January 6, 2023. Dividends payable of $71,854,000 related to this special dividend were included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2022. The Company declared and paid $0.92 per share, or $35,191,000 in the aggregate, in cash dividends during fiscal year 2021 and, during such period, also paid $76,770,000 of dividends payable which were declared during fiscal year 2020 and included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 26, 2020. The Company declared and paid $0.79 per share, or $30,557,000 in the aggregate, in cash dividends during fiscal year 2020 and, during such period, also paid $78,947,000 of dividends payable which were declared during fiscal year 2019 and included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 28, 2019. In addition, on December 8, 2020, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $2.00 per share, or $76,770,000 in the aggregate, payable on January 22, 2021 to stockholders of record of its Common Stock as of January 8, 2021. Dividends payable of $76,770,000 related to this special dividend were included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 26, 2020. The Company declared and paid $0.70 per share, or $27,891,000 in the aggregate, in cash dividends during fiscal year 2019. The Company declared and paid $0.63 per share, or $25,933,000 in the aggregate, in cash dividends during fiscal year 2018 and, during such period, also paid $62,985,000 of dividends payable which were declared during fiscal year 2017 and included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 30, 2017. Since paying its first cash dividend in August 2005, the Company has paid approximately $506,000,000$728,000,000 in cash dividends in the aggregate to its stockholders, inclusive of the $2.00 per share special dividend paid on January 22, 2021.

20, 2023.

During fiscal year 2022, the Company purchased 1,900,826 shares of its Common Stock at a total cost of $285,983,000. During fiscal year 2021, the Company purchased 733,854 shares of its Common Stock at a total cost of $122,722,000. During fiscal year 2020, the Company purchased 1,178,970 shares of its Common Stock at a total cost of $115,962,000. During fiscal year 2019, the Company purchased 849,068 shares of its Common Stock at a total cost of $88,578,000. During fiscal year 2018, the Company purchased 2,000,000 shares of its Common Stock at a total cost of $208,087,000. The Company has used cash provided by operating activities to fund the purchases. Since January 1997, the Company has purchased approximately $1,791,000,000$2,200,000,000 of its Common Stock under programs authorized by the Board of Directors of the Company in open market and private block transactions. As of December 26, 2020,31, 2022, the Company may purchase in the aggregate up to 1,821,0303,000,000 shares of its Common Stock under its authorized stock purchase programs. Long-term debt, including current maturities, was $103,400,000 at December 31, 2022, compared to $111,804,000 at December 25, 2021 and $100,774,000 at December 26, 2020, compared to $112,844,000 at December 28, 2019 and $128,425,000 at December 29, 2018.2020.

35


Equity

Shareholders’ equity was $691,835,000,$887,221,000, or 87%90% of total capitalization (defined as long-term debt including current maturities plus equity), at December 26, 2020,31, 2022, compared to $721,469,000,$862,010,000, or 86%89% of total capitalization at December 28, 201925, 2021 and $689,133,000,$691,835,000, or 84%87% of total capitalization at December 29, 2018.26, 2020. The decreaseincrease in shareholders’ equity in fiscal year 2020 was primarily the result of net income, almost entirely offset by purchases of shares of the Company’s Common Stock and dividends declared by the Company in fiscal year 2020, partially offset by net income.2022. The increase in shareholders’ equity in fiscal year 20192021 was primarily the result of net income, partially offset by purchases of shares of the Company’s Common Stock and dividends declared by the Company in fiscal year 2019.

2021.

On August 18, 2020, Landstar entered into an amended and restated credit agreement with a syndicate of banks and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Credit“First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”). As previously disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2022, Landstar entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement, dated July 1, 2022, with a bank syndicate led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) that superseded and replaced the First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement which matures on August 18, 2023,July 1, 2027, provides $250,000,000 offor borrowing capacity in the form of a revolving credit facility $35,000,000of $300,000,000, $45,000,000 of which may be utilized in the form of letters of credit. The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement also includes an “accordion” feature providing for a possible increase of up to an aggregate amount of borrowing capacity of $400,000,000.

$600,000,000. The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which superseded and replaced the First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, is referred to herein as the “Credit Agreement.”

The Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants that limit, among other things, the incurrence of additional indebtedness. The Company is required to, among other things, maintain a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio,fixed charge coverage ratio, as defineddescribed in the Credit Agreement, and maintain a Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, below a specified maximum. The Credit Agreement provides for a restriction on cash dividends and other distributions to stockholders on the Company’s capital stock to the extent there is a default under the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Credit Agreement under certain circumstances limits the amount of such cash dividends and other distributions to stockholders to the extent that, after giving effect to any payment made to effect such cash

32

dividend or other distribution, the Leverage Ratio would exceed 2.5 to 1 on a pro forma basis as of the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter. The Credit Agreement provides for an event of default in the event that, among other things, a person or group acquires 35% or more of the outstanding capital stock of the Company or obtains power to elect a majority of the Company’s directors or the directors cease to consist of a majority of Continuing Directors, as defined in the Credit Agreement. None of these covenants are presently considered by management to be materially restrictive to the Company’s operations, capital resources or liquidity. The Company is currently in compliance with all of the debt covenants under the Credit Agreement.

At December 26, 2020,31, 2022, the Company had no borrowings outstanding and $33,618,000$33,493,000 of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement. At December 26, 2020,31, 2022, there was $216,382,000$266,507,000 available for future borrowings under the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Company has $64,934,000$76,567,000 in letters of credit outstanding as collateral for insurance claims that are secured by investments totaling $72,149,000$85,074,000 at December 26, 2020.31, 2022. Investments, all of which are carried at fair value, include primarily investment-grade bonds and U.S. Treasury obligationsasset-backed securities having maturities of up to five years. Fair value of investments is based primarily on quoted market prices. See “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included herein for further discussion on measurement of fair value of investments.

Historically, the Company has generated sufficient operating cash flow to meet its debt service requirements, fund continued growth, both organic and through acquisitions, complete or execute share purchases of its Common Stock under authorized share purchase programs, pay dividends and meet working capital needs. As an asset-light provider of integrated transportation management solutions, the Company’s annual capital requirements for operating property are generally for trailing equipment and information technology hardware and software. In addition, a significant portion of the trailing equipment used by the Company is provided by third party capacity providers, thereby reducing the Company’s capital requirements. During fiscal years 2020, 20192022, 2021 and 2018,2020, the Company acquired $31,633,000, $29,054,000$30,659,000, $48,674,000 and $46,595,000,$31,633,000, respectively, of trailing equipment by entering into finance leases. During fiscal years 2020, 20192022, 2021 and 2018,2020, the Company also purchased $30,626,000, $19,416,000$26,005,000, $23,261,000 and $9,747,000,$30,626,000, respectively, of operating property. Included in the $9,747,000$23,261,000 of purchases of operating property during the 20182021 fiscal year was $2,162,000 related to the completion of its Laredo, Texas facility for which the Company accrued a corresponding liability in accounts payable as of December 30, 2017. During fiscal year 2020, Landstar acquired $500,000 of operating property for which the Company accrued a corresponding liability in accounts payable as of December 26, 2020. Landstar anticipates acquiring either by purchase or lease financing approximately $77,000,000$78,000,000 in new trailing equipment, primarily to replace older trailing equipment in fiscal 2021.year 2023. Landstar anticipates spending approximately $23,000,000$19,000,000 on information technology hardware and software in fiscal 2021, $16,000,000year 2023, $14,000,000 of which relates to either building or buying software applications that enhance or add to the Company’s technology ecosystem. In addition, Landstar anticipates spending approximately $13,000,000 on buildings and improvements.

36


As previously disclosed in the Company’s 2019 Annual Report on Form
10-K,
on January 29, 2019,

On April 1, 2022, Landstar acquired all of the remaining equity interests in Landstar MetroInvestment Holdco, LLC, a newly formed Delaware LLC and Landstar Servicios held by their former minority equityholders. As of such date, Landstar Metro and Landstar Servicios each became wholly owned subsidiariessubsidiary of Landstar System Holdings, Inc., purchased Class A units of Cavnue, LLC for approximately $4,999,000 in cash consideration. Cavnue, LLC is a privately held company focused on combining technology and road infrastructure to unlock the Company. Cash consideration paid in the 2019 fiscal year to purchase these remaining equity interests was $600,000.full potential of connected and autonomous vehicles. Further, on June 15, 2020, Landstar Blue completed the acquisition of an independent agent of the Company. CashTotal cash consideration paid for the acquisition was approximately $2,766,000.

$2,934,000.

Management believes that cash flow from operations combined with the Company’s borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement will be adequate to meet Landstar’s debt service requirements, fund continued growth, both internal and through acquisitions, pay dividends, complete the authorized share purchase programsprogram and meet working capital needs.

Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in certain claims and pending litigation arising from the normal conduct of business. Many of these claims are covered in whole or in part by insurance. Based on knowledge of the facts and, in certain cases, opinions of outside counsel, management believes that adequate provisions have been made for probable losses with respect to the resolution of all such claims and pending litigation and that the ultimate outcome, after provisions therefor, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company, but could have a material effect on the results of operations in a given quarter or year.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Landstar provides for the estimated costs of self-insured claims primarily on an actuarial basis. The amount recorded for the estimated liability for claims incurred is based upon the facts and circumstances known on the applicable balance sheet date. The ultimate resolution of these claims may be for an amount greater or less than the amount estimated by management. The Company continually revises its existing claim estimates as new or revised information becomes available on the status of each claim. Historically, the Company has experienced both favorable and unfavorable development of prior years’ claims estimates. During fiscal

33

years 2020, 20192022, 2021 and 2018,2020, insurance and claims costs included $9,196,000, $16,679,000$11,331,000, $9,708,000 and $13,960,000$9,196,000 of net unfavorable adjustments to prior years’ claims estimates, respectively. The unfavorable development of prior years’ claims in the 2020 and 20192022 fiscal yearsyear was attributable to several specific claims. The unfavorable development of prior years’ claims in eachthe 2021 fiscal year was primarily attributable to five claims. The unfavorable development of prior year’s claims in the 2020 fiscal year was attributable to several specific claims as well as to actuarially determined adjustments to prior year commercial trucking loss estimates. It is reasonably likely that the ultimate outcome of settling all outstanding claims will be more or less than the estimated claims liability at December 26, 2020.
31, 2022.

Significant variances from management’s estimates for the ultimate resolution of self-insured claims could be expected to positively or negatively affect Landstar’s earnings in a given quarter or year. However, management believes that the ultimate resolution of these items, given a range of reasonably likely outcomes, will not significantly affect the long-term financial condition of Landstar or its ability to fund its continuing operations.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of its financing activities, primarily its borrowings on its revolving credit facility, if any, and investing activities with respect to investments held by the insurance segment.

On August 18, 2020, Landstar entered into an amendedthe First Amended and restated credit agreementRestated Credit Agreement with a syndicate of banks and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (theagent. As previously disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2022, Landstar entered into the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated July 1, 2022, with a bank syndicate led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent. The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which superseded and replaced the First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, is referred to herein as the “Credit Agreement”).Agreement.” The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement which matures on August 18, 2023,July 1, 2027, provides $250,000,000 offor borrowing capacity in the form of a revolving credit facility $35,000,000of $300,000,000, $45,000,000 of which may be utilized in the form of letters of credit. The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement also includes an “accordion” feature providing for a possible increase of up to an aggregate amount of borrowing capacity of $400,000,000.$600,000,000.

37


The revolving credit loans under the Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2022, at the option of Landstar, bear interest at (i) a forward-looking term rate based on the Eurocurrencysecured overnight financing rate plus 0.10% and an applicable margin ranging from 1.25% to 2.00%, or (ii) an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.25% to 1.00%, in each case with the applicable margin determined based upon the Company’s Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, at the end of the most recent applicable fiscal quarter for which financial statements have been delivered. The revolving credit facility bears a commitment fee, payable in arrears, of 0.25%0.20% to 0.35%0.30%, based on the Company’s Leverage Ratio at the end of the most recent applicable fiscal quarter for which financial statements have been delivered. As of both December 26, 202031, 2022 and December 28, 201925, 2021 and during the entire fourth quarter of 2022 and all of fiscal years 2020 and 2019,year 2021, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement.

Long-term investments, all of which are

available-for-sale
and are carried at fair value, include primarily investment-grade bonds and U.S. Treasury obligationsasset-backed securities having maturities of up to five years. Assuming that the long-term portion of investments remains at $81,216,000,$104,575,000, the balance at December 26, 2020,31, 2022, a hypothetical increase or decrease in interest rates of 100 basis points would not have a material impact on future earnings on an annualized basis. Short-term investments consist of short-term investment-grade instruments and the current maturities of investment-grade corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury obligations.asset-backed securities. Accordingly, any future interest rate risk on these short-term investments would not be material to the Company’s operating results.

Assets and liabilities of the Company’s Canadian and Mexican operations are translated from their functional currency to U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and revenue and expense accounts are translated at average monthly exchange rates during the period. Adjustments resulting from the translation process are included in accumulated other comprehensive income. Transactional gains and losses arising from receivable and payable balances, including intercompany balances, in the normal course of business that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the operation are recorded in the statements of income when they occur. The assets held at the Company’s Canadian and Mexican subsidiaries at December at 26, 202031, 2022 were collectively, as translated to U.S. dollars, approximately 4% of total consolidated assets. Accordingly, translation gains or losses of 25%35% or less related to the Canadian and Mexican operations would not be material.

38


34

Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
   
Dec. 26,

2020
  
Dec. 28,

2019
 
ASSETS
 
Current Assets
         
Cash and cash equivalents
  $249,354  $319,515 
Short-term investments
   41,375   32,901 
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance of $8,670 and $7,284
   764,169   588,549 
Other receivables, including advances to independent contractors, less allowance of $7,239 and $7,667
   134,757   35,553 
Other current assets
   18,520   21,370 
          
Total current assets
   1,208,175   997,888 
          
Operating property, less accumulated depreciation and amortization of $299,407 and $280,849
   296,996   285,855 
Goodwill
   40,949   38,508 
Other assets
   107,679   105,460 
          
Total assets
  $1,653,799  $1,427,711 
          
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
Current Liabilities
         
Cash overdraft
  $74,748  $53,878 
Accounts payable
   380,505   271,996 
Current maturities of long-term debt
   35,415   42,632 
Insurance claims
   149,774   44,532 
Dividends payable
   76,770   78,947 
Other current liabilities
   88,925   60,919 
          
Total current liabilities
   806,137   552,904 
          
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities
   65,359   70,212 
Insurance claims
   38,867   33,575 
Deferred income taxes and other noncurrent liabilities
   51,601   49,551 
Shareholders’ Equity
         
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 160,000,000 shares, issued 68,183,702 and 68,083,419 shares
   682   681 
Additional
paid-in
capital
   228,875   226,123 
Retained earnings
   2,046,238   1,962,161 
Cost of 29,797,639 and 28,609,926 shares of common stock in treasury
   (1,581,961  (1,465,284
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
   (1,999  (2,212
          
Total shareholders’ equity
   691,835   721,469 
          
Total liabilities and equity
  $1,653,799  $1,427,711 
          
   
Dec. 31,

2022
  
Dec. 25,

2021
 
ASSETS
 
Current Assets         
Cash and cash equivalents  $339,581  $215,522 
Short-term investments   53,955   35,778 
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance of $12,121 and $7,074   967,793   1,154,314 
Other receivables, including advances to independent contractors, less allowance of $10,579 and $8,125   56,235   101,124 
Other current assets   21,826   16,162 
          
Total current assets   1,439,390   1,522,900 
          
Operating property, less accumulated depreciation and amortization of $393,274 and $344,099   314,990   317,386 
Goodwill   41,220   40,768 
Other assets   136,279   164,411 
          
Total assets  $1,931,879  $2,045,465 
          
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
Current Liabilities         
Cash overdraft  $92,953  $116,478 
Accounts payable   527,372   604,130 
Current maturities of long-term debt   36,175   36,561 
Insurance claims   50,836   46,896 
Dividends payable   71,854   75,387 
Other current liabilities   98,945   130,531 
          
Total current liabilities   878,135   1,009,983 
          
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities   67,225   75,243 
Insurance claims   58,268   49,509 
Deferred income taxes and other noncurrent liabilities   41,030   48,720 
Shareholders’ Equity         
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 160,000,000 shares, issued 68,382,310 and 68,232,975 shares   684   682 
Additional
paid-in
capital
   258,487   255,148 
Retained earnings   2,635,960   2,317,184 
Cost of 32,455,300 and 30,539,235 shares of common stock in treasury   (1,992,886  (1,705,601
Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (15,024  (5,403
          
Total shareholders’ equity   887,221   862,010 
          
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity  $1,931,879  $2,045,465 
          
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
5
39

LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
   
Fiscal Years Ended
 
   
December 26,

2020
   
December 28,

2019
  
December 29,

2018
 
Revenue
  $4,132,981   $4,084,577  $4,615,144 
Investment income
   3,399    5,041   3,816 
Costs and expenses:
              
Purchased transportation
   3,192,850    3,127,474   3,569,961 
Commissions to agents
   340,780    342,226   378,002 
Other operating costs, net of gains/losses on asset sales/dispositions   30,463    37,274   31,803 
Insurance and claims
   87,773    80,319   75,677 
Selling, general and administrative
   167,633    158,953   188,212 
Depreciation and amortization
   45,855    44,468   43,570 
Impairment of intangible and other assets
   2,582    —     —   
Commission program termination costs
   15,494    —     —   
               
Total costs and expenses
   3,883,430    3,790,714   4,287,225 
               
Operating income
   252,950    298,904   331,735 
Interest and debt expense
   3,953    3,141   3,354 
               
Income before income taxes
   248,997    295,763   328,381 
Income taxes
   56,891    68,060   73,168 
               
Net income
   192,106    227,703   255,213 
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
   —      (17  (68
               
Net income attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary
  $192,106   $227,720  $255,281 
               
Earnings per common share attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary
  $4.98   $5.72  $6.19 
               
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary
  $4.98   $5.72  $6.18 
               
Average number of shares outstanding:
              
Earnings per common share
   38,602,000    39,786,000   41,273,000 
               
Diluted earnings per share
   38,602,000    39,786,000   41,310,000 
               
Dividends per common share
  $2.79   $2.70  $0.63 
               
   
Fiscal Years Ended
 
   
December 31,

2022
   
December 25,

2021
   
December 26,

2020
 
Revenue  $7,436,562   $6,537,568   $4,132,981 
Investment income   3,162    2,857    3,399 
Costs and expenses:               
Purchased transportation   5,804,017    5,114,667    3,192,850 
Commissions to agents   614,865    507,209    340,780 
Other operating costs, net of gains on asset sales/dispositions   45,192    36,531    30,463 
Insurance and claims   125,835    105,463    87,773 
Selling, general and administrative   221,279    221,278    167,633 
Depreciation and amortization   57,453    49,609    45,855 
Impairment of intangible and other assets   —      —      2,582 
Commission program termination costs   —      —      15,494 
                
Total costs and expenses   6,868,641    6,034,757    3,883,430 
                
Operating income   571,083    505,668    252,950 
Interest and debt expense   3,620    3,976    3,953 
                
Income before income taxes   567,463    501,692    248,997 
Income taxes   136,549    120,168    56,891 
                
Net income  $430,914   $381,524   $192,106 
                
Diluted earnings per share  $11.76   $9.98   $4.98 
                
Average diluted shares outstanding   36,633,000    38,235,000    38,602,000 
                
Dividends per common share  $3.10   $2.92   $2.79 
                
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
4
3
6
0

LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in thousands)
 
   
Fiscal Years Ended
 
   
Dec. 26,

2020
  
Dec. 28,

2019
   
Dec. 29,

2018
 
Net income attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary
  $ 192,106  $ 227,720   $255,281 
Other comprehensive income (loss):
              
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
investments, net of tax expense (benefit) of $463, $561, $(206)
   1,688   2,050    (786
Foreign currency translation (losses) gains
   (1,475  1,613    (1,927
               
Other comprehensive income (loss)
   213   3,663    (2,713
               
Comprehensive income attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary
  $192,319  $231,383   $252,568 
               
   
Fiscal Years Ended
 
   
Dec. 31,

2022
  
Dec. 25,

2021
  
Dec. 26,

2020
 
Net income  $430,914  $381,524  $192,106 
Other comprehensive (loss) income:             
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on
available-for-sale
investments, net of tax (benefit) expense of ($2,345), ($739) and $463
   (8,562  (2,695  1,688 
Foreign currency translation losses   (1,059  (709  (1,475
              
Other comprehensive (loss) income   (9,621  (3,404  213 
              
Comprehensive income  $421,293  $378,120  $192,319 
              
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
4
3
7
1

Table of Contents
LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
   
Fiscal Years Ended
 
   
Dec. 26,

2020
  
Dec. 28,

2019
  
Dec. 29,

2018
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
             
Net income
  $192,106  $227,703  $255,213 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
             
Depreciation and amortization of operating property and intangible assets
   45,855   44,468   43,570 
Non-cash
interest charges
   334   253   253 
Provisions for losses on trade and other accounts receivable
   9,415   9,831   7,415 
Gains on sales/disposals of operating property
   (2,576  (1,016  (979
Impairment of intangible and other assets
   2,582   —     —   
Deferred income taxes, net
   1,130   4,767   2,115 
Stock-based compensation
   4,639   4,236   18,256 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
             
(Increase) decrease in trade and other accounts receivable
   (285,169  81,415   (57,419
Increase in other assets
   (4,719  (11,395  (2,962
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
   108,090   (42,138  22,527 
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
   28,496   (17,786  8,367 
Increase in insurance claims
   110,534   7,502   1,545 
              
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
   210,717   307,840   297,901 
              
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
             
Net change in other short-term investments
   131   (131  —   
Sales and maturities of investments
   22,632   62,922   51,576 
Purchases of investments
   (25,550  (65,922  (54,041
Purchases of operating property
   (30,626  (19,416  (9,747
Proceeds from sales of operating property
   7,760   3,991   4,018 
Consideration paid for acquisition
   (2,766  —     —   
              
NET CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES
   (28,419  (18,556  (8,194
              
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
             
Increase (decrease) in cash overdraft
   20,870   (1,461  13,097 
Dividends paid
   (109,504  (27,891  (88,918
Payment for debt issue costs
   (1,132  —     —   
Proceeds from exercises of stock options
   725   1,056   1,435 
Taxes paid in lieu of shares issued related to stock-based compensation plans
   (3,326  (8,456  (3,938
Purchases of common stock
   (115,962  (88,578  (208,087
Principal payments on finance lease obligations
   (43,703  (44,635  (43,283
Purchase of noncontrolling interest
   —     (600  —   
Payment of contingent consideration
   —     —     (985
              
NET CASH USED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
   (252,032  (170,565  (330,679
              
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
   (427  1,060   (1,708
              
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
   (70,161  119,779   (42,680
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
   319,515   199,736   242,416 
              
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $249,354  $319,515  $199,736 
              
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
8

Table of Contents
LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
   
Fiscal Years Ended
 
   
Dec. 31,

2022
  
Dec. 25,

2021
  
Dec. 26,

2020
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES             
Net income  $430,914  $381,524  $192,106 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:             
Depreciation and amortization   57,453   49,609   45,855 
Non-cash
interest charges
   355   447   334 
Provisions for losses on trade and other accounts receivable   12,220   5,722   9,415 
Gains on sales/disposals of operating property   (2,944  (1,830  (2,576
Impairment of intangible and other assets   —     —     2,582 
Deferred income taxes, net   (5,360  (3,790  1,130 
Stock-based compensation   12,399   27,537   4,639 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:             
Decrease (increase) in trade and other accounts receivable   219,190   (362,234  (285,169
(Increase) decrease in other assets   (5,938  4,444   (4,719
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable   (76,758  224,125   108,090 
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities   (31,571  43,422   28,496 
Increase (decrease) in insurance claims   12,699   (92,236  110,534 
              
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES   622,659   276,740   210,717 
              
INVESTING ACTIVITIES             
Net change in other short-term investments   —     —     131 
Sales and maturities of investments   41,198   31,938   22,632 
Purchases of investments   (40,202  (84,992  (25,550
Purchases of operating property   (26,005  (23,261  (30,626
Proceeds from sales of operating property   5,236   2,971   7,760 
Consideration paid for acquisition   —     —     (2,766
Purchase of
non-marketable
securities
   (4,999  —     —   
              
NET CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES   (24,772  (73,344  (28,419
              
FINANCING ACTIVITIES             
(Decrease) increase in cash overdraft   (23,525  41,730   20,870 
Dividends paid   (115,671  (111,961  (109,504
Payment for debt issue costs   (1,080  —     (1,132
Proceeds from exercises of stock options   68   160   725 
Taxes paid in lieu of shares issued related to stock-based compensation plans   (10,428  (2,342  (3,326
Purchases of common stock   (285,983  (122,722  (115,962
Principal payments on finance lease obligations   (39,063  (37,644  (43,703
Payment of deferred consideration   —     (168  —   
              
NET CASH USED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES   (475,682  (232,947  (252,032
              
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents   (2,195  (232  (427
              
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash   120,010   (29,783  (70,161
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period   219,571   249,354   319,515 
              
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period  $339,581  $219,571  $249,354 
              
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
2

LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2022,
December 25, 2021 and December 26, 2020
December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
 
  
Landstar System, Inc. and Subsidiary Shareholders
       
        
Additional
           
Accumulated
Other
  
Non-
    
  
Common Stock
  
Paid-In
  
Retained
  
Treasury Stock at Cost
  
Comprehensive
  
controlling
    
  
Shares
  
Amount
  
Capital
  
Earnings
  
Shares
  
Amount
  
(Loss) Income
  
Interests
  
Total
 
Balance December 30, 2017
   67,740,380$677$209,599  $1,611,158   25,749,493$(1,167,600 $ (3,162)  $3,205  $653,877 
Adoption of accounting standards (Note 1)
           773                 773 
Net income (loss)
           255,281             (68  255,213 
Dividends ($0.63 per share)
           (25,933                (25,933
Purchases of common stock
               2,000,000 (208,087          (208,087
Transaction with noncontrolling interests
       1,078                 (1,078  —   
Issuance of stock related to stock-based compensation plans
   130,582 2 (2,081      5,508 (424          (2,503
Stock-based compensation
       18,256                     18,256 
Other comprehensive (loss) income
                     (2,713  250   (2,463
                                
Balance December 29, 2018
   67,870,962$679$226,852  $1,841,279   27,755,001$(1,376,111 $(5,875 $2,309  $689,133 
Net income (loss)
           227,720             (17  227,703 
Dividends ($2.70 per share)
           (106,838                (106,838
Purchases of common stock
               849,068 (88,578          (88,578
Purchase noncontrolling interests
       1,842                 (2,442  (600
Issuance of stock related to stock-based compensation plans
   212,457 2 (6,807      5,857 (595          (7,400
Stock-based compensation
       4,236                     4,236 
Other comprehensive income
                     3,663   150   3,813 
                                
Balance December 28, 2019
   68,083,419$681$226,123  $1,962,161   28,609,926$(1,465,284 $(2,212 $—    $721,469 
Adoption of accounting standards (Note 1
6
)
           (702                (702
Net income
           192,106      ��          192,106 
Dividends ($2.79 per share)
           (107,327                (107,327
Purchases of common stock
               1,178,970 (115,962          (115,962
Issuance of stock related to stock-based compensation plans
   100,283 1 (1,887      8,743 (715          (2,601
Stock-based compensation
       4,639                     4,639 
Other comprehensive income
                     213   —     213 
                                
Balance December 26, 2020
   68,183,702$ 682$228,875  $2,046,238   29,797,639$(1,581,961 $(1,999 $—    $691,835 
                                      
   
Common Stock
   
Additional
Paid-In
  
Retained
  
Treasury Stock at Cost
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
    
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
  
Earnings
  
Shares
   
Amount
  
(Loss) Income
  
Total
 
Balance December 28, 2019   68,083,419   $681   $226,123  $1,962,161   28,609,926   $(1,465,284 $(2,212 $721,469 
Adoption of accounting standards
(Note 17)
                 (702               (702
Net income                 192,106                192,106 
Dividends ($2.79 per share)                 (107,327               (107,327
Purchases of common stock                     1,178,970    (115,962      (115,962
Issuance of stock related to stock-based compensation plans   100,283    1    (1,887      8,743    (715      (2,601
Stock-based compensation             4,639                    4,639 
Other comprehensive income                              213   213 
                                     
Balance December 26, 2020   68,183,702   $682   $228,875  $2,046,238   29,797,639   $(1,581,961 $(1,999 $691,835 
Net income                 381,524                381,524 
Dividends ($2.92 per share)                 (110,578               (110,578
Purchases of common stock                     733,854    (122,722      (122,722
Issuance of stock related to stock-based compensation plans   49,273    —      (1,264      7,742    (918      (2,182
Stock-based compensation             27,537                    27,537 
Other comprehensive loss                              (3,404  (3,404
                                     
Balance December 25, 2021   68,232,975   $682   $255,148  $2,317,184   30,539,235   $(1,705,601 $(5,403 $862,010 
Net income                 430,914                430,914 
Dividends ($3.10 per share)                 (112,138               (112,138
Purchases of common stock                     1,900,826    (285,983      (285,983
Issuance of stock related to stock-based
compensation plans
   149,335    2    (9,060      15,239    (1,302      (10,360
Stock-based compensation             12,399                    12,399 
Other comprehensive loss                              (9,621  (9,621
                                     
Balance December 31, 2022   68,382,310   $684   $258,487  $2,635,960   32,455,300   $(1,992,886 $(15,024 $887,221 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
4
39
3

Table of Contents
LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Significant Accounting Policies
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Landstar System, Inc. and its subsidiary, Landstar System Holdings, Inc. (“LSHI”). Landstar System, Inc. and its subsidiary are herein referred to as “Landstar” or the “Company.” Significant intercompany accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires the use of management’s estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fiscal Year
Landstar’s fiscal year is the 52 or 53 week period ending the last Saturday in December.
Revenue Recognition
The nature of the Company’s freight transportation services and its performance obligations to customers, regardless of the mode of transportation used to perform such services, relate to the safe and
on-time
pick-up
and delivery of a customer’s freight on a
shipment-by-shipment
basis. Landstar customers are typically invoiced on a
shipment-by-shipment
basis at a
pre-defined
rate, payable thirty to sixty
(30-60)
days after the customer’s receipt of such invoice. Payment terms to customers do not contain a significant financing component and the amount owed by the customer does not contain variable terms, embedded or otherwise. We have determined that revenue recognition over the freight transit period provides a faithful depiction of the transfer of services to the customer as our obligation for which we are primarily responsible for fulfilling is performed over the transit period. Accordingly, transportation revenue billed to a customer for the physical transportation of freight and related direct freight expenses are recognized on a gross basis over the freight transit period as the performance obligation to the customer is satisfied. The Company determines the transit period for a given shipment based upon the
pick-up
date and the delivery date, which may be estimated if delivery has not occurred as of the reporting date. Determining the transit period and how much of it has been completed as of a given reporting date may therefore require management to make judgments that affect the timing of revenue recognized. With respect to shipments with a
pick-up
date in one reporting period and a delivery date in another, the Company recognizes such transportation revenue based on relative transit time in each reporting period. A days in transit output method is used to measure the progress of the performance of the Company’s freight transportation services as of the reporting date and a portion of the total revenue that will be billed to the customer once a load is delivered is recognized in each reporting period based on the percentage of total transit time that has been completed at the end of the applicable reporting period. Reinsurance premiums of the insurance segment are recognized over the period earned, which is usually on a monthly basis. Fuel surcharges billed to customers for freight hauled by independent contractors who provide truck capacity to the Company under exclusive lease arrangements (the “BCO Independent Contractors”) are excluded from revenue and paid in entirety to the BCO Independent Contractors.
Adoption of Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”
The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update
2014-09
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(“ASU
2014-09”)
on December 31, 2017 under the modified retrospective transition method resulting in a $773,000 cumulative adjustment to retained earnings. Our reported results for 2020, 2019 and 2018 are presented under Topic 606
.
4
0
4

Revenue from Contracts with Customers – Disaggregation of Revenue
The following table summarizes
(i)
the percentage of consolidated revenue generated by mode of transportation and
(ii)
the
total
amount
of
truck transportation revenue
hauled
by BCO Independent Contractors and Truck Brokerage Carriers
generated by
equipment type during the fiscal years ended December 26, 2020,31, 2022, December 28, 201925, 2021 and December 29, 201826, 2020 (dollars in thousands):
 
   
Fiscal Years Ended
 
Mode  
December 31,

2022
  
December 25,

2021
  
December 26,

2020
 
Truck – BCO Independent Contractors   35  40  45
Truck – Truck Brokerage Carriers   54  51  47
Rail intermodal   2  2  3
Ocean and air cargo carriers   8  5  3
Truck Equipment Type
             
Van equipment  $3,892,085  $3,525,830  $2,192,254 
Unsided/platform equipment  $1,760,357  $1,549,037  $1,119,272 
Less-than-truckload  $142,438  $117,505  $97,546 
Other truck transportation (1)  $835,959  $770,846  $406,709 
   
Fiscal Years Ended
 
Mode
  
December 26,

2020
  
December 28,

2019
  
December 29,

2018
 
Truck – BCO Independent Contractors   45  45  43
Truck – Truck Brokerage Carriers   47  47  49
Rail intermodal
   3  3  3
Ocean and air cargo carriers
   3  3  3
Truck Equipment Type
             
Van equipment
  $ 2,515,940  $ 2,371,188  $ 2,791,494 
Unsided/platform equipment
  $1,202,295  $1,295,817  $1,386,387 
Less-than-truckload
  $97,546  $98,324  $102,531 
(1)Includes power-only, expedited, straight truck, cargo van, and miscellaneous other truck transportation revenue generated by the transportation logistics segment. Power-only refers to shipments where the Company furnishes a power unit and an operator but not trailing equipment, which is typically provided by the shipper or consignee.
Insurance Claim Costs
Landstar provides, primarily on an actuarially determined basis, for the estimated costs of cargo, property, casualty, general liability and workers’ compensation claims both reported and for claims incurred but not reported.
For periods prior to May 1, 2019, Landstar retains liability for commercial trucking claims up to $5,000,000$5 million per occurrence and maintains various third party insurance arrangements for liabilities in excess of its $5,000,000$5 million self-insured retention. Effective May 1, 2019, the Company entered into a new three year commercial auto liability insurance arrangement for losses incurred between $5,000,000$5 million and $10,000,000$10 million (the “Initial Excess Policy”) with a third party insurance company. The Company subsequently extended the Initial Excess Policy for one additional policy year, from May 1, 2022 through April 30, 2023. For commercial trucking claims incurred on or after May 1, 20192022 through April 30, 2022,2023, the extended Initial Excess Policy provides for a limit for a single loss of $5,000,000,$5 million, with ana remaining aggregate limit of $15,000,000$10 million for eachthe policy year, an aggregate limit of $20,000,000 for the
thirty-six
month term endedperiod ending April 30, 2022,2023, and optionsan option to increase such aggregate limitslimit for a
pre-established
amountsamount of additional premium. If aggregate losses under the Initial Excess Policy exceed either the annual aggregate limit or the aggregate limit for the three year period ending April 30, 2022,2023, and the Company did not elect to increase such aggregate limitslimit for a
pre-established
amount of additional premium, Landstarthe Company would retain liability of up to $10,000,000$10 million per occurrence, inclusive of its $5,000,000$5 million self-insured retention for commercial trucking claims during the remainder of the applicable policy year(s). Moreover,
aperiod ending April 30, 2023.
s a result of the Company’s aggregate loss experience since it entered into the Initial Excess Policy, the
Initial Excess Policy required the Company to
pay additional premium 
up to a pre-established maximum amount of $3,500,000,
which was provided for in insurance and claims costs for the Company’s 2020 fiscal first quarter.
The Company also maintains third party insurance arrangements providing excess coverage for commercial trucking liabilities in excess of $10,000,000.$10 million. These third party arrangements provide coverage on a per occurrence or aggregated basis. Due to the increasing cost of commercial auto liability claims throughout the United States inIn recent years, the availabilityCompany has increased the level of suchits financial exposure to commercial trucking claims in excess coverage has significantly decreasedof $10 million, including through the use of additional self-insurance, deductibles, aggregate loss limits, quota shares and the pricing associatedother arrangements with such excess coverage, to the extent available, has significantly increased. Effective May 1, 2020 with respect to the annual policy year ending April 30, 2021, the Company experienced an increase of approximately $14 million, or over 170%, in the premiums charged by third party insurance companies, tobased on the Company foravailability of coverage within certain excess insurance coverage for commercial trucking liabilities in excess of $10,000,000.
In addition,layers and estimated cost differentials between proposed premiums from third party insurance arrangements providing excess coverage for commercial trucking liabilities in excess of Landstar’s self-insured retention generally require thatcompanies and historical and actuarially projected losses experienced by the Company fund settlement payments to claimants and seek reimbursement from the Company’s third partyat various levels of excess insurance providers, as applicable. In connection with settlements of claims in excess of the Company’s $5 million self-insured retention, the Company accrues for such anticipated settlement payments and records a corresponding receivable for amounts the Company expects to collect from its third party insurance providers following the payment of such settlement amounts. On the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 26, 2020, the Company has an aggregate accrual of current liabilities in insurance claims for anticipated payments of settlement amounts above our self-insured retention ofcoverage.
41

$104,000,000, and a corresponding amount of current assets included in other receivables. The Company believes it is reasonably assured that it will collect these receivables from its third party insurance providers following its payment of the settlement amounts included in its accrual. The Company evaluates collectability of these receivables based on the credit worthiness and surplus of the applicable third party insurance provider, along with its prior experience and contractual terms with such third party insurance provider.
Further, the Company retains liability of up to $1,000,000 for each general liability claim, up to $250,000 for each workers’ compensation claim and up to $250,000 for each cargo claim. In addition, under reinsurance arrangements by Signature of certain risks of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors, the Company retains liability of up to $500,000, $1,000,000 or $2,000,000 with respect to certain occupational accident claims and up to $750,000 with respect to certain workers’ compensation claims.
 
4
5

Tires
Tires purchased as part of trailing equipment are capitalized as part of the cost of the equipment. Replacement tires are charged to expense when placed in service.
Cash, and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Included in cash and cash equivalents are all investments, except those provided for collateral, with an original maturity of 3 months or less.
At December 25, 2021, the Company had $4,049,000 of restricted cash held by the Company’s insurance segment included in the short-term investments balance of $35,778,000, providing collateral, along with certain other investments, for the letters of credit issued to guarantee payment of insurance claims.
Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments include cash equivalents, short and long-term investments, trade and other accounts receivable, accounts payable, other accrued liabilities, and long-term debt plus current maturities (“Debt”). The carrying value of cash equivalents, trade and other accounts receivable, accounts payable, current insurance claims and other accrued liabilities approximates fair value as the assets and liabilities are short term in nature. Short and long-term investments are carried at fair value as further described in Note 4 in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company’s Debt includes borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility, to the extent there are any, plus borrowings relating to finance lease obligations used to finance trailing equipment. The interest rates on borrowings under the revolving credit facility are typically tied to short-term interest rates that adjust monthly and, as such, carrying value approximates fair value. Interest rates on borrowings under finance leases approximate the interest rates that would currently be available to the Company under similar terms and, as such, carrying value approximates fair value.
4
2

Trade and Other Receivables
The allowance for doubtful accounts for both trade and other receivables represents management’s estimate of the amount of outstanding receivables that will not be collected. Estimates are used to determine the allowance for doubtful accounts for both trade and other receivables and are generally based on specific identification, historical collection results, current economic trends and changes in payment trends.
Following is a summary of the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts for fiscal years ending December 26, 2020,31, 2022, December 28, 201925, 2021 and December 29, 201826, 2020 (in thousands):
 
   
Balance at

Beginning of

Period
   
Charged to

Costs and

Expenses
   
Write-offs,

Net of

Recoveries
   
Balance at

End of

Period
 
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022
                    
Trade receivables  $7,074   $7,354   $(2,307  $12,121 
Other receivables   9,511    4,863    (2,629   11,745 
Other
non-current
receivables
   200    3    —      203 
                     
   $16,785   $12,220   $(4,936  $24,069 
                     
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 25, 2021
                    
Trade receivables  $8,670   $1,735   $(3,331  $7,074 
Other receivables   8,399    4,050    (2,938   9,511 
Other
non-current
receivables
   264    (63   (1   200 
                     
   $17,333   $5,722   $(6,270  $16,785 
                     
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 26, 2020
                    
Trade receivables  $7,284   $6,121   $(4,735  $8,670 
Other receivables   8,806    3,291    (3,698   8,399 
Other
non-current
receivables
   260    3    1    264 
                     
   $16,350   $9,415   $(8,432  $17,333 
                     
   
Balance at

Beginning of

Period
   
Charged to

Costs and

Expenses
   
Write-offs,

Net of

Recoveries
   
Balance at

End of

Period
 
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 26, 2020
                    
Trade receivables
  $ 7,284   $ 6,121   $(4,735  $ 8,670 
Other receivables
   8,806    3,291    (3,698   8,399 
Other
non-current
receivables
   260    3    1    264 
                     
   $ 16,350   $9,415   $(8,432  $17,333 
                     
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2019
                    
Trade receivables
  $6,413   $4,309   $(3,438  $7,284 
Other receivables
   7,211    5,518    (3,923   8,806 
Other
non-current
receivables
   256    4    —      260 
                     
   $13,880   $9,831   $(7,361  $16,350 
                     
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2018
                    
Trade receivables
  $6,131   $3,886   $(3,604  $6,413 
Other receivables
   6,952    3,520    (3,261   7,211 
Other
non-current
receivables
   251    9    (4   256 
                     
   $13,334   $7,415   $(6,869  $ 13,880 
                     
Operating Property
Operating property is recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the
estimated
useful lives of the related assets. Buildings and improvements are being depreciated over 30 years. Trailing equipment is being depreciated over 7 to 10 years. Information technology hardware and software included in other equipment is generally being depreciated over 3 to 7 years.
4
6
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets of acquired businesses. The Company
has 2two reporting units within the transportation logistics segment that report goodwill. The Company reviews its goodwill balance annually for impairment for each reporting unit, unless circumstances dictate more frequent assessments, and in accordance with ASU
2011-08,
Testing Goodwill for Impairment
. ASU
2011-08
permits an initial assessment, commonly referred to as “step zero”, of qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount and also provides a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative analysis required by ASC Topic 350. In the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020,2022, the Company performed the qualitative assessment of goodwill and determined it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of its reporting units would be greater than its carrying amount. Therefore, the Company determined it was not necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. Furthermore, there has been no historical impairment of the Company’s goodwill.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense is equal to the current year’s liability for income taxes and a provision for deferred income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to be applied to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
Share-Based Payments
The Company’s share-based payment arrangements include restricted stock units (“RSU”), stock options,
non-vested
restricted stock, and Deferred Stock Units.Units and stock options. The fair value of an RSU with a performance condition is determined based on the market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant, discounted for lack of marketability for a minimum post-vesting holding
4
3

requirement. With respect to RSU awards with a performance condition, the Company reports compensation expense ratably over the life of the award based on an estimated number of units that will vest over the life of the award, multiplied by the fair value of an RSU. The fair value of an RSU with a market condition is determined at the time of grant based on the expected achievement of the market condition at the end of each vesting period. With respect to RSU awards with a market condition, the Company recognizes compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period under an award based on the fair market value of the award at the time of grant, regardless of whether the market condition is satisfied. Previously recognized compensation cost would be reversed, however, if the employee terminated employment prior to completing such requisite service period. The Company estimates the fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model and recognizes compensation cost for stock option awards expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Forfeitures are estimated at grant date based on historical experience and anticipated employee turnover. The fair values of each share of
non-vested
restricted stock issued and Deferred Stock Unit granted are based on the fair value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant and
compensation
costs for
non-vested
restricted stock and Deferred Stock Units are recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the award.
Earnings Per Share
Earnings per common share
attributable
to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary are based on the weighted average number of shares
outstanding,
, including outstanding
non-vested
restricted stock and outstanding Deferred Stock Units. Diluted
earnings
per share attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary are based on the weighted average number of common shares and Deferred Stock Units outstanding plus the incremental shares that would have been outstanding upon the assumed exercise of all dilutive stock options.
The following table provides a reconciliation of During the average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate earnings per common share attributable to Landstar System, Inc.fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, December 25, 2021 and subsidiaryDecember 26, 2020, in reference to the average numberdetermination of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per share, the future compensation cost attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary (in thousands):outstanding shares of
non-vested
restricted stock exceeded the impact of incremental shares that would have been outstanding upon the assumed exercise of all dilutive stock options.
   
Fiscal Years
 
   
2020
   
2019
   
2018
 
Average number of common shares outstanding
   38,602    39,786    41,273 
Incremental shares from assumed exercises of stock options
   —      —      37 
                
Average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding
   38,602    39,786    41,310 
                
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, December 25, 2021 and December 26, 2020, December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, 0no options outstanding to purchase shares of Common Stock were antidilutive. Outstanding RSUs were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary for all periods because the performance metric requirements or market condition for vesting had not been satisfied.
4
7

Dividends Payable
On December 8, 2020,6, 2022, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $2.00 per share payable on
January 22, 2021,20, 2023 to stockholders of record of its Common Stock as of January 8, 2021.6, 2023. Dividends payable of $76,770,000$71,854,000 related to this special dividend were included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 26, 2020.31, 2022.
On December 10, 2019,7, 2021, the Company announced that its Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $2.00 per share payable on
January 24, 2020,21, 2022, to stockholders of record of its Common Stock as of January 10, 2020.7, 2022. Dividends payable of $78,947,000$75,387,000 related to this special dividend were included in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 28, 2019.25, 2021.
Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities of the Company’s Canadian and Mexican operations are translated from their functional currency to U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and revenue and expense accounts are translated at average monthly exchange rates during the period. Adjustments resulting from the translation process are included in accumulated other comprehensive income. Transactional gains and losses arising from receivable and payable balances, including intercompany balances, in the normal course of business that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the operation are recorded in the statements of income when they occur.
4
4

(2) Acquired Business
On May 6, 2020,
the
C
ompan
y
Company formed a new subsidiary that was subsequently renamed Landstar Blue, LLC (“Landstar Blue”). Landstar Blue arranges truckload brokerage services while helpingwith a focus on the contract services market. Landstar Blue also helps the Company to develop and test digital technologies and processes for the benefit of all Landstar independent commission sales agents. On June 15, 2020, Landstar Blue completed the acquisition of an independent agent of the Company whose business focused on truckload brokerage services. Cash consideration paid for the acquisition was approximately $2,766,000. In addition, the Company assumed approximately $200,000 in liabilities consisting of additional contingent purchase price.price, of which $168,000 was remitted during the Company’s 2021 second fiscal quarter. The resulting goodwill arising from the acquisition was approximately $2,871,000. With respect to this goodwill, 100% is expected to be deductible by the Company for U.S. income tax purposes. Pro forma financial information for prior periods is not presented as the Company does not believe the acquisition to be material to the Company’s consolidated results. The results of operations for Landstar Blue are presented as part of the Company’s transportationstransportation logistics segment. Transaction costs for the acquisition were insignificant.
(3) Other Comprehensive Income
The following table presents the components of and changes in accumulated other comprehensive income attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary,(loss), net of related income taxes, as of and for the fiscal years ended December 26, 2020,31, 2022, December 28, 201925, 2021 and December 29, 201826, 2020 (in thousands):
 
  
Unrealized
Holding (Losses)
Gains on
Available-for-Sale

Securities
   
Foreign Currency
Translation
   
Total
 
Balance as of December 30, 2017
  $(144  $(3,018  $(3,162
Other comprehensive loss
   (786   (1,927   (2,713
            
Balance as of December 29, 2018
   (930   (4,945   (5,875
Other comprehensive income
   2,050    1,613    3,663 
              
Unrealized
Holding
 
Gains
(Losses) on
Available-for-Sale

Securities
   
Foreign Currency
Translation
   
Total
 
Balance as of December 28, 2019
   1,120    (3,332   (2,212  $1,120   $ (3,332  $ (2,212
Other comprehensive income (loss)
   1,688    (1,475   213    1,688    (1,475   213 
              
 
   
 
   
 
 
Balance as of December 26, 2020
  $2,808   $(4,807  $(1,999   2,808    (4,807   (1,999
Other comprehensive loss
   (2,695   (709   (3,404
              
 
   
 
   
 
 
Balance as of December 25, 2021
   113   $ (5,516  $ (5,403
Other comprehensive loss
   (8,562   (1,059   (9,621
  
 
   
 
   
 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2022
  $ (8,449  $ (6,575  $ (15,024
  
 
   
 
   
 
 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to investment income due to the realization of previously unrealized gains and losses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income were not significant for the fiscal years ended December 26, 2020,31, 2022, December 28, 201925, 2021 and December 29, 2018.26, 2020.
4
8

(4) Investments
Investments include primarily investment-grade corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury obligationsasset-backed securities having maturities of up to five years (the “bond portfolio”) and money market investments. Investments in the bond portfolio are reported as
available-for-sale
and are carried at fair value. Investments maturing less than one year from the balance sheet date are included in short-term investments and investments maturing more than one year from the balance sheet date are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Management performs an analysis of the nature of the unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
investments to determine whether an allowance for credit loss is
appropriate.
necessary. Unrealized losses, representing the excess of the purchase price of an investment over its fair value as of the end of a period, considered to be a result of credit-related factors, are to be included as a charge in the statement of income, while unrealized losses considered to be a result of non
-non-credit-related
credit-related factors are to be included as a component of shareholders’ equity. Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets are classified within Level 1. Investments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active, but are valued based on quoted market prices, are classified within Level 2. As Level 2 investments include positions that are not traded in active markets, valuations may be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or
non-transferability,
which are generally based on available market information. Any transfers between levels are recognized as of the beginning of any reporting period. Fair value of the bond portfolio was determined using Level 1 inputs related to U.S. Treasury obligations and money market investments and Level 2 inputs related to investment-grade corporate bonds, asset-backed securities and direct obligations of government agencies. Unrealized losses, net of unrealized gains, on the investments in the bond portfolio were $10,763,000 at December 31, 2022, while unrealized gains, net of unrealized losses, on the investments in the bond portfolio were $3,578,000 and $1,427,000$144,000 at December 26, 2020 and December 28, 2019, respectively.
4
5

25, 2021.
The amortized cost and fair values of
available-for-sale
investments are as follows at December 26, 202031, 2022 and December 28, 201925, 2021 (in thousands):
 
  
Amortized
Cost
   
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   
Fair

Value
   
Amortized
Cost
   
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
   
Fair

Value
 
December 26, 2020
            
December 31, 2022
            
Money market investments
  $17,867   $—     $ —     $17,867   $21,910   $—     $—     $21,910 
Asset-backed securities
   567    —      26    541    18,905    —      2,889    16,016 
Corporate bonds and direct obligations of government agencies
   98,241    3,551    72    101,720    126,134    1    7,775    118,360 
U.S. Treasury obligations
   2,338    125    —      2,463    2,344    —      100    2,244 
                  
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
Total
  $119,013   $3,676   $98   $122,591   $ 169,293   $1   $ 10,764   $ 158,530 
                  
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
December 28, 2019
            
December 25, 2021
            
Money market investments
  $15,691   $—     $—     $15,691   $8,750   $—     $—     $8,750 
Asset-backed securities
   572    —      1    571    22,441    —      346    22,095 
Corporate bonds and direct obligations of government agencies
   97,583    1,465    44    99,004    137,916    1,406    966    138,356 
U.S. Treasury obligations
   2,335    12    5    2,342    2,342    50    —      2,392 
                  
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
Total
  $ 116,181   $ 1,477   $50   $117,608   $171,449   $ 1,456   $1,312   $171,593 
                  
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
49

For those
available-for-sale
investments with unrealized losses at December 26, 202031, 2022 and December 28, 2019,25, 2021, the following table summarizes the duration of the unrealized loss (in thousands):
 
   
Less than 12 months
   
12 months or longer
   
Total
 
   
Fair

Value
   
Unrealized

Loss
   
Fair

Value
   
Unrealized

Loss
   
Fair

Value
   
Unrealized

Loss
 
December 26, 2020
                              
Asset-backed securities
  $541   $26   $—     $ —     $541   $ 26 
Corporate bonds and direct obligations of government agencies
   2,681    72    —      —      2,681    72 
                               
Total
  $3,222   $98   $—     $—     $3,222   $98 
                               
December 28, 2019
                              
Asset-backed securities
  $571   $1   $—     $—     $571   $1 
Corporate bonds and direct obligations of government agencies
   8,728    41    4,260    3    12,988    44 
U.S. Treasury obligations
   1,226    5    —      —      1,226    5 
                               
Total
  $10,525   $ 47   $4,260   $3   $14,785   $50 
                               
   
Less than 12 months
   
12 months or longer
   
Total
 
   
Fair

Value
   
Unrealized

Loss
   
Fair

Value
   
Unrealized

Loss
   
Fair

Value
   
Unrealized

Loss
 
December 31, 2022
                              
Asset-backed securities
  $—     $—     $ 16,016   $ 2,889   $16,016   $2,889 
Corporate bonds and direct obligations of
government agencies
   54,031    1,516    62,390    6,259    116,421    7,775 
U.S. Treasury obligations
   2,244    100    —      —      2,244    100 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $ 56,275   $ 1,616   $78,406   $9,148   $ 134,681   $ 10,764 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
December 25, 2021
                              
Asset-backed securities
  $22,095   $346   $—     $—     $22,095   $346 
Corporate bonds and direct obligations of
government agencies
   72,526    966    —      —      72,526    966 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total
  $94,621   $1,312   $—     $—     $94,621   $1,312 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
The Company believes unrealized losses on investments were primarily caused by rising interest rates rather than changes in credit quality. The Company expects to recover, through collection of all of the contractual cash flows of each security, the amortized cost basis of these securities as it does not intend to sell, and does not anticipate being required to sell, these securities before recovery of the cost basis. For these reasons, no losses have been recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.
Short-term investments include $41,375,000$53,955,000 in current maturities of investments held by the Company’s insurance segment at December 26, 2020.31, 2022. The
non-current
portion of the bond portfolio of $81,216,000$104,575,000 is included in other assets. The short-term investments, together with $30,774,000$31,119,000 of
non-current
investments, provide collateral for the $64,934,000$76,567,000 of letters of credit issued to guarantee payment of insurance claims.
Investment income represents the earnings on the insurance segment’s assets. Investment income earned from the assets of the insurance segment are included as a component of operating income as the investment of these assets is critical to providing collateral, liquidity and earnings with respect to the operation of the Company’s insurance programs.
4
6

(5) Income Taxes
The provisions for income taxes consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
  
Fiscal Years
   
Fiscal Years
 
  
2020
   
2019
   
2018
   
2022
   
2021
   
2020
 
Current:
                  
Federal
  $47,955   $52,422   $60,650   $116,642   $104,640   $47,955 
State
   7,249    10,367    9,410    23,309    18,462    7,249 
Foreign
   557    504    993    1,958    856    557 
              
 
   
 
   
 
 
Total current
  $55,761   $63,293   $71,053   $ 141,909   $ 123,958   $ 55,761 
              
 
   
 
   
 
 
Deferred:
                  
Federal
  $1,523   $4,212   $1,730   $(3,945  $(3,278  $1,523 
State
   (393   555    385    (1,415   (512   (393
              
 
   
 
   
 
 
Total deferred
  $1,130   $4,767   $2,115   $(5,360  $(3,790  $1,130 
              
 
   
 
   
 
 
Income taxes
  $56,891   $68,060   $73,168   $136,549   $120,168   $56,891 
              
 
   
 
   
 
 
5
0

Temporary differences and carryforwards which gave rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
  
Dec. 26, 2020
   
Dec. 28, 2019
   
Dec. 31, 2022
   
Dec. 25, 2021
 
Deferred tax assets:
            
Receivable valuations
  $4,286   $4,004   $5,838   $4,112 
Share-based payments
   2,020    2,923    5,021    7,000 
Self-insured claims
   3,613    3,565    3,205    3,696 
Other
   6,056    2,935    11,381    10,354 
          
 
   
 
 
Total deferred tax assets
  $15,975   $13,427   $ 25,445   $ 25,162 
          
 
   
 
 
Deferred tax liabilities:
            
Operating property
  $52,014   $49,669   $49,092   $57,903 
Goodwill
   3,772    4,223    3,892    3,958 
Other
   3,087    1,531    3,895    2,409 
          
 
   
 
 
Total deferred tax liabilities
  $58,873   $55,423   $56,879   $64,270 
          
 
   
 
 
Net deferred tax liability
  $42,898   $41,996   $31,434   $39,108 
          
 
   
 
 
The following table summarizes the differences between income taxes calculated at the federal income tax ratesrate of 21% for 2020, 2019, and 2018 on income before income taxes and the provisions for income taxes (in thousands):
 
  
Fiscal Years
   
Fiscal Years
 
  
2020
   
2019
   
2018
   
2022
   
2021
   
2020
 
Income taxes at federal income tax rate
  $52,289   $62,110   $68,960   $119,167   $105,355   $ 52,289 
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
   5,375    8,876    7,713    16,596    14,260    5,375 
Non-deductible
executive compensation
   96    —      1,012    3,552    2,946    96 
Meals and entertainment exclusion
   326    644    719    200    —      326 
Share-based payments
   (977   (3,093   (2,138   (2,958   (1,070   (977
Section 199 deductions and R&D credits
   (717   (714   (3,309
Research and development credits
   (1,526   (2,069   (717
Other, net
   499    237    211    1,518    746    499 
              
 
   
 
   
 
 
Income taxes
  $56,891   $68,060   $73,168   $136,549   $120,168   $56,891 
              
 
   
 
   
 
 
The Company files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. The Company or its subsidiaries file state tax returns in the majority of the U.S. state tax jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to U.S. federal or state income tax examinations by tax authorities for 20162018 and prior years. The Company’s wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary, Landstar Canada, Inc., is subject to Canadian income and other taxes. The Company’s wholly-owned Mexican subsidiaries, Landstar Holdings, S. de R.L.C.V., Landstar Metro, S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Landstar Metro, Servicios S.A.P.I. de C.V., are subject to Mexican income and other taxes. The Company’s Canadian and Mexican subsidiaries also may each be subject to U.S. income and other taxes.
As of December 26, 202031, 2022 and December 28, 2019,25, 2021, the Company had $2,030,000$3,046,000 and $2,253,000,$2,344,000, respectively, of net unrecognized tax benefits representing the provision for the uncertainty of certain tax positions plus a component of interest and penalties. Estimated interest and penalties on the provision for the uncertainty of certain tax positions is included in income tax expense. At December 26, 202031, 2022 and December 28, 2019
,
25, 2021, there was $648,000$845,000 and $690,000,$658,000, respectively, accrued for estimated interest and penalties related to the uncertainty of certain tax positions. The Company does not currently anticipate any significant increase or decrease to the unrecognized tax benefit during fiscal year 2021.
4
7

2023.
The following table summarizes the rollforward of the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits for fiscal years 20202022 and 20192021 (in thousands):
 
  
Fiscal Years
   
Fiscal Years
 
  
2020
   
2019
   
2022
   
2021
 
Gross unrecognized tax benefits – beginning of the year
  $3,014   $3,519   $ 2,845   $ 2,585 
Gross increases related to current year tax positions
   349    468    789    782 
Gross increases related to prior year tax positions
   232    469    792    315 
Gross decreases related to prior year tax positions
   —      (295   (83   (17
Settlements
   —      (356
Lapse of statute of limitations
   (1,010   (791   (617   (820
          
 
   
 
 
Gross unrecognized tax benefits – end of the year
  $2,585   $3,014   $3,726   $2,845 
          
 
   
 
 
Landstar paid income taxes of $158,715,000 in fiscal year 2022, $104,844,000 in fiscal year 2021 and $47,589,000 in fiscal year 2020, $67,317,000 in fiscal year 2019 and $75,124,000 in fiscal year 2018.2020.
5
1

(6) Operating Property
Operating property is summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
  
Dec. 26, 2020
   
Dec. 28, 2019
   
Dec. 31, 2022
   
Dec. 25, 2021
 
Land
  $16,328   $15,834   $16,328   $16,328 
Buildings and improvements
   64,314    58,484    69,160    65,034 
Trailing equipment
   433,400    425,595    502,322    479,300 
Information technology hardware and software
   110,626    91,115 
Other equipment
   82,361    66,791    9,828    9,708 
          
 
   
 
 
Total operating property, gross
   596,403    566,704    708,264    661,485 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
   299,407    280,849    393,274    344,099 
          
 
   
 
 
Total operating property, net
  $296,996   $285,855   $ 314,990   $ 317,386 
          
 
   
 
 
Included above is $199,045,000$185,609,000 in fiscal year 20202022 and $222,993,000$189,053,000 in fiscal year 20192021 of operating property under finance leases, $139,259,000$137,087,000 and $156,439,000,$143,227,000, respectively, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Landstar acquired operating property by entering into finance leases in the amount of $30,659,000 in fiscal year 2022, $48,674,000 in fiscal year 2021 and $31,633,000 in fiscal year 2020, $29,054,000 in fiscal year 2019 and $46,595,000 in fiscal year 2018.2020.
(7) Retirement Plan
Landstar sponsors an Internal Revenue Code section 401(k) defined contribution plan for the benefit of U.S. domiciled full-time employees who have completed sixthree months of service. The Company reduced the employee service requirement to three months of service as of January 1, 2022. Eligible employees make voluntary contributions up to
75% of their base salary, subject to certain limitations. Landstar contributes an amount equal to 100% of the first 3% and 50% of the next 2% of such contributions, subject to certain limitations.
The expense for the Company-sponsored defined contribution plan included in selling, general and administrative expense was $2,716,000 in fiscal year 2022, $2,374,000 in fiscal year 2021 and $2,417,000 in fiscal year 2020, $2,427,000 in fiscal year 2019 and $2,147,000 in fiscal year 2018.2020.
(8) Debt
Other than the finance lease obligations as presented on the consolidated balance sheets, the Company had 0no outstanding debt as of December 26, 202031, 2022 and December 28, 2019.25, 2021.
On August 18, 2020, Landstar entered into
an amended and restated
credit agreement with a syndicate of banks and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent
(
the “Credit(the “First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”).
As previously disclosed in a Form
8-K
filed with the SEC on July 8, 2022, Landstar entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement, dated July 1, 2022, with a bank syndicate led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) that superseded and replaced the First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement,
, which matures on August 18, 2023,
July 1, 2027, provides $250,000,000 offor borrowing capacity in the form of a revolving credit facility $35,000,000of $300,000,000, $45,000,000 of which may be utilized in the form of letters of credit. The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement also includes an “accordion” feature providing for a possible increase of up to an aggregate amount of borrowing capacity of $400,000,000.
$600,000,000.
4
8

December 31, 2022 and December 25, 2021, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement.
The revolving credit loans under the Credit Agreement, at the option of Landstar, bear interest at (i) a forward-looking term rate based on the Eurocurrencysecured overnight financing rate plus 0.10% and an applicable margin ranging from 1.25% to 2.00%, or (ii) an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.25% to 1.00%, in each case with the applicable margin determined based upon the Company’s Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, at the end of the most recent applicable fiscal quarter for which financial statements have been delivered. The revolving credit facility bears a commitment fee, payable quarterly in arrears, of 0.25%0.20% to 0.35%0.30%, based on the Company’s Leverage Ratio at the end of the most recent applicable fiscal quarter for which financial statements have been delivered. As
5
2

Table of December 26, 2020 and December 28, 2019, the Company had 0 borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement.Contents
The Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants that limit, among other things, the incurrence of additional indebtedness. The Company is required to, among other things, maintain a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio,fixed charge coverage ratio, as defineddescribed in the Credit Agreement, and maintain a Leverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, below a specified maximum. The Credit Agreement provides for a restriction on cash dividends and other distributions to stockholders on the Company’s capital stock to the extent there is a default under the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Credit Agreement under certain circumstances limits the amount of such cash dividends and other distributions to stockholders to the extent that, after giving effect to any payment made to effect such cash dividend or other distribution, the Leverage Ratio would exceed 2.5 to 1 on a pro forma basis as of the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter. The Credit Agreement provides for an event of default in the event that, among other things, a person or group acquires 35% or more of the outstanding capital stock of the Company or obtains power to elect a majority of the Company’s directors or the directors cease to consist of a majority of Continuing Directors, as defined in the Credit Agreement. None of these covenants are presently considered by management to be materially restrictive to the Company’s operations, capital resources or liquidity. The Company is currently in compliance with all of the debt covenants under the Credit Agreement.
The interest rates on borrowings under the revolving credit facility are typically tied to short-term interest rates that adjust monthly and, as such, carrying value approximates fair value. Interest rates on borrowings under finance leases approximate the interest rates that would currently be available to the Company under similar terms and, as such, carrying value approximates fair value.
Landstar paid interest of $4,151,000 in fiscal year 2022, $3,715,000 in fiscal year 2021 and $3,915,000 in fiscal year 2020, $4,439,000 in fiscal year 2019 and $3,761,000 in fiscal year 2018.2020.
(9) Leases
Landstar’s noncancelable leases are primarily comprised of finance leases for the acquisition of new trailing equipment. Each finance lease for the acquisition of trailing equipment is a five year lease with a $1 purchase option for the applicable equipment at lease expiration. Substantially all of Landstar’s operating lease
right-of-use
assets and operating lease liabilities represent leases for facilities maintained in support of the Company’s network of BCO Independent Contractors and office space used to conduct Landstar’s business. These leases do not have significant rent escalation holidays, concessions, leasehold improvement incentives or other
build-out
clauses. Further, the leases do not contain contingent rent provisions. Landstar also
rents
certain trailing equipment to supplement the Company-owned trailer fleet under
“month-to-month”
lease terms, which are not required to be recorded on the balance sheet due to the less than twelve month lease term exemption. Sublease income is primarily comprised of weekly trailing equipment rentals to our BCO Independent Contractors.
Most of Landstar’s operating leases include one or more options to renew. The exercise of lease renewal options is typically at Landstar’s sole discretion, and, as such, the majority of renewals to extend the lease terms are not included in the
right-of-use
assets and lease liabilities as they are not reasonably certain of exercise. Landstar regularly evaluates the renewal options, and when they are reasonably certain of exercise, Landstar includes the renewal period in the lease term.
As most of Landstar’s operating leases do not provide an implicit rate, Landstar utilized its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date in determining the present value of the lease payments. Landstar has a centrally managed treasury function; therefore, based on the applicable lease terms and the current economic environment, we applythe Company applies a portfolio approach for determining the incremental borrowing rate.
49

Table of Contents
The components of lease cost for finance leases and operating leases as of December 26, 202031, 2022 were (in thousands):
 
Finance leases:
      
Amortization of
right-of-use
assets
  $24,589   $ 22,071 
Interest on lease liability
   3,155    2,908 
      
 
 
Total finance lease cost
   27,744    24,979 
Operating leases:
      
Lease cost
   3,075    3,495 
Variable lease cost
   —      —   
Sublease income
   (4,695   (5,616
      
 
 
Total net operating lease income
   (1,620   (2,121
      
 
 
Total net lease cost
  $26,124   $22,858 
      
 
 
5
3

Table of Contents
Total rent expense, net of sublease rent income, under operating leases was $490,000 in fiscal year 2019. Total sublease rentlease income, net of rent expense under operating leases, was $868,000$1,632,000 and $1,620,000 in fiscal year 2018.years 2021 and 2020, respectively.
A summary of the lease classification on ourthe Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 26, 202031, 2022 is as follows (in thousands):
Assets:
 
Operating lease
right-of-use
assets
  Other assets  $2,595  Other assets $2,044 
Finance lease assets
  Operating property, less accumulated depreciation and amortization   139,259  Operating property, less accumulated depreciation and amortization  137,087 
          
 
 
Total lease assets
     $141,854    $139,131 
          
 
 
Liabilities:
The following table reconciles the undiscounted cash flows for the finance and operating leases to the finance and operating lease liabilities recorded on the balance sheet at December 26, 202031, 2022 (in thousands):
 
   
Finance

Leases
   
Operating

Leases
 
2021
  $37,917   $762 
2022
   28,774    697 
2023
   21,759    612 
2024
   11,827    528 
2025
   5,580    216 
Thereafter
   —      —   
           
Total future minimum lease payments
   105,857    2,815 
Less amount representing interest (1.9% to 4.4%)
   5,083    220 
           
Present value of minimum lease payments
  $100,774   $2,595 
           
Current maturities of long-term debt
   35,415      
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities
   65,359      
Other current liabilities
        739 
Deferred income taxes and other noncurrent liabilities
        1,856 
   
Finance

Leases
   
Operating

Leases
 
2023
  $39,032   $801 
2024
   29,795    680 
2025
   23,126    419 
2026
   15,807    127 
2027
   4,312    127 
Thereafter
   —      49 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Total future minimum lease payments
   112,072    2,203 
Less amount representing interest (1.6% to 5.6%)
   8,672    159 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Present value of minimum lease payments
  $ 103,400   $ 2,044 
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
Current maturities of long-term debt
36,175
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities
67,225
Other current liabilities782
Deferred income taxes and other noncurrent liabilities
1,262
The weighted average remaining lease term and the weighted average discount rate for finance and operating leases as of December 26, 202031, 2022 were:
 
  
Finance Leases
 
Operating Leases
   Finance Leases Operating Leases 
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
   3.4   4.0    3.5   3.3 
Weighted average discount rate
   3.0  4.0   3.0  4.5
 
5
04

Table of Contents
(10) Share-Based Payment Arrangements
As of Decemb
e
r 26, 2020,December 31, 2022, the Company had 2has an employee equity incentive plans, the 2002 employee stock option and stock incentive plan, (the “ESOSIP”) and the 2011 equity incentive plan (the “2011 EIP”). No further grants can be made under the ESOSIP. The Company also has a stock compensation plan for members of its Board of Directors, the 2022 Directors Stock Compensation Plan (the “2022 DSCP”), which replaced the Amended and Restated 2013 Directors Stock Compensation Plan (as amended and restated, as of May 17, 2016, the “2013 DSCP”). At the Company’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 11, 2022, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2022 DSCP. The provisions of the 2022 DSCP are substantially similar to the provisions of the 2013 DSCP. 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock were authorized for issuance under the 2011 EIP and 115,000200,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stockcommon stock were authorized for issuance under the 2022 DSCP. No further grants can be made under the 2013 DSCP, including
 from the
56,502 shares of the Company’s common stock previously reserved for issuance, but not issued, under the 2013 DSCP. The ESOSIP, 2011 EIP, 2013 DSCP and 20132022 DSCP are each referred to herein as a “Plan,” and, collectively, as the “Plans.”Amounts recognized in the financial statements with respect to these Plans are as follows (in thousands):
 
  
Fiscal Years
   
Fiscal Years
 
  
2020
   
2019
   
2018
   
2022
   
2021
   
2020
 
Total cost of the Plans during the period
  $4,639   $4,236   $18,256   $12,399   $27,537   $4,639 
Amount of related income tax benefit recognized during the period
   (2,114   (4,130   (6,610   (5,199   (7,063   (2,114
              
 
   
 
   
 
 
Net cost of the Plans during the period
  $2,525   $106   $11,646   $7,200   $20,474   $2,525 
              
 
   
 
   
 
 
Included in income tax benefits recognized in the fiscal years ended December 26, 2020,31, 2022, December 28, 201925, 2021 and December 29, 201826, 2020 were excess tax benefits from stock-based awards of $941,000, $3,019,000$2,948,000, $1,057,000 and $2,060,000,$941,000, respectively.
As of December 26, 2020,31, 2022, there were 60,586193,217 shares of the Company’s Common Stock reserved for issuance under the 20132022 DSCP and 3,672,2863,242,308 shares of the Company’s Common Stock reserved for issuance in the aggregate under the ESOSIP and 2011 EIP.
Restricted Stock Units
The following table summarizes information regarding the Company’s outstanding restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards with either a performance condition or a market condition under the Plans:
 
  
Number
of RSUs
   
Weighted Average

Grant Date Fair
Value
   
Number of
RSUs
   
Weighted Average

Grant Date

Fair Value
 
Outstanding at December 30, 2017
   387,372   $55.75 
Granted
   65,824   $95.94 
Vested
   (67,971  $53.92 
Forfeited
   (92,880  $52.36 
       
Outstanding at December 29, 2018
   292,345   $66.31 
Outstanding at December 28, 2019
   198,875   $84.37 
Granted
   68,820   $89.34    59,967   $102.58 
Shares earned in excess of target
(1)
   71,172   $54.78    11,648   $77.00 
Vested shares, including shares earned in excess of target
   (226,981  $53.27    (76,290  $73.44 
Forfeited
   (6,481  $86.60    (10,987  $100.55 
         
 
    
Outstanding at December 28, 2019
   198,875   $84.37 
Outstanding at December 26, 2020
   183,213   $93.44 
Granted
   59,967   $102.58    46,342   $128.64 
Shares earned in excess of target
(2)
   11,648   $77.00    7,132   $31.97 
Vested shares, including shares earned in excess of target
   (76,290  $73.44    (24,600  $59.85 
Forfeited
   (10,987  $100.55    (2,688  $107.76 
         
 
    
Outstanding at December 26, 2020
   183,213   $93.44 
Outstanding at December 25, 2021
   209,399   $102.90 
Granted
   50,019   $139.44 
Shares earned in excess of target
(3)
   91,497   $92.58 
Vested shares, including shares earned in excess of target
   (177,146  $95.48 
Forfeited
   (21,989  $113.85 
         
 
    
Outstanding at December 31, 2022
   151,780   $115.80 
  
 
    

(1)
Represents additional shares earned under both the January 27, 2015 and January 29, 2016 RSU awards as fiscal year 2018 financial results exceeded target performance level and under the May 1, 2015 RSU award as total shareholder return exceeded the target under the award.
(2)
Represents additional shares earned under the February 2, 2017 RSU awards as fiscal year 2019 financial results exceeded target performance level.
(2)
Represents shares earned in excess of target under the May 1, 2015 RSU award as total shareholder return exceeded the target under the award.
(3)
Represents additional shares earned under each of the February 2, 2017, February 2, 2018 and February 1, 2019 RSU awards, as fiscal year 2021 financial results exceeded target performance level under each such award.
5
5

Table of Contents
During fiscal years 2018, 20192020, 2021 and 2020,2022, the Company granted RSUs with a performance condition. During fiscal years 2018 and 2019, the Company also issued
RSUs with a marketperformance condition granted on January 28, 2022 may vest on January 31 of 2025, 2026 and 2027 based on growth in operating income and
pre-tax
income per diluted share from continuing operations as further described below.compared to the results from the 2021 fiscal year. RSUs with a performance condition granted on January 29, 2021 may vest on January 31 of 2024, 2025 and 2026 based on growth in operating income and
pre-tax
income per diluted share from continuing operations as compared to the results from the 2020 fiscal year, adjusted to reflect the add back of
non-cash
impairment charges recorded in the Company’s 2020 fiscal year related to certain assets, primarily customer contract and related customer relationship intangible assets, held by the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries. RSUs with a performance condition granted on January 31, 2020 may vest on January 31 of 2023, 2024 and 2025. RSUs with a performance condition granted on February 1, 2019 may vest on January 31 of 2022, 2023 and 2024. RSUs with a performance condition granted on February 2, 2018 may vest on January 31 of 2021, 2022 and 2023. RSUs with a performance condition granted
51

Table of Contents
on January 31, 2020, February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018 vest2025 based on growth in operating income and
pre-tax
income per diluted share from continuing operations attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary as compared to a base year, being the year immediately precedingresults from the year of grant.2019 fiscal year. At the time of grant, the target number of common shares available for issuance under the January 28, 2022, January 29, 2021 and January 31, 2020 February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018 grants equals
100
% 100% of the number of RSUs granted, and the maximum number of common shares available for issuance under the January 28, 2022, January 29, 2021 and January 31, 2020 February 1, 2019 and February 2, 2018 grants equals
200
% 200% of the number of RSUs credited to the recipient. In the event actual results exceed the target, the number of shares that will be granted will exceed the number of RSUs granted. The fair value of an RSU with a performance condition was determined based on the market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant, discounted for lack of marketability for a minimum post-vesting holding requirement. The discount rate due to lack of marketability used for RSU award grants with a performance condition for all periods was
7
% 7%. With respect to RSU awards with a performance condition, the Company reports compensation expense over the life of the award based on an estimated number of units that will vest over the life of the award, multiplied by the fair value of an RSU at the time of grant.
During fiscal year 2019, the Company granted 9,725 RSUs that vest based on a market condition. During fiscal year 2018, the Company granted 9,324 RSUs that vest based on a market condition. The RSUs granted in 2019 may vest on June 30 of 2023, 2024 and 2025, and the RSUs granted in 2018 may vest on June 30 of 2022, 2023 and 2024, in each case based on the Company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) compound annual growth rate over the vesting periods, adjusted to reflect dividends (if any) paid during such periods and capital adjustments as may be necessary. The maximum number of common shares available for issuance under each grant equals 150% of the number of RSUs granted. The fair value of each RSU award was determined at the time of grant based on the expected achievement of the market condition at the end of each vesting period. With respect to these RSU awards, the Company reports compensation expense ratably over the life of the award based on an estimated number of units that will vest over the life of the award, multiplied by the fair value of the RSU. Previously recognized compensation cost would be reversed only if the employee terminated employment prior to completing the requisite service period.
The Company recognized approximately $1,602,000, $1,557,000$9,100,000, $24,197,000 and $15,985,000$1,602,000 of share-based compensation expense related to RSU awards in fiscal years 2020, 20192022, 2021 and 2018,2020, respectively. As of December 26, 2020,31, 2022, there was a maximum of $33.5$17.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSU awards granted under the Plans with an expected average remaining life of approximately 2.83.5 years. With respect to RSU awards with a performance condition, the amount of future compensation expense to be recognized will be determined based on future operating results.
Non-vested
Restricted Stock and Deferred Stock Units
The 2011 EIP provides the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors with the authority to issue shares of Common Stock of the Company, subject to certain vesting and other restrictions on transfer (“restricted stock”).
The following table summarizes information regarding the Company’s outstanding shares of
non-vested
restricted stock and Deferred Stock Units (defined below) under the Plans:
 
  
Number of

Shares and Deferred

Stock Units
   
Weighted Average
Grant Date

Fair Value
 
Non-vested
at December 30, 2017
   54,755   $78.02 
Granted
   22,803   $113.35 
Vested
   (19,814  $75.11 
Forfeited
   (1,757  $71.12 
       
Non-vested
at December 29, 2018
   55,987   $93.66 
Granted
   30,338   $102.76 
Vested
   (21,517  $92.70 
         
Number of

Shares and Deferred

Stock Units
   
Weighted Average
Grant Date

Fair Value
 
Non-vested
at December 28, 2019
   64,808   $98.24    64,808   $98.24 
Granted
   26,604   $111.88    26,604   $111.88 
Vested
   (28,621  $98.83    (28,621  $98.83 
Forfeited
   (2,351  $106.34    (2,351  $106.34 
         
 
    
Non-vested
at December 26, 2020
   60,440   $103.65    60,440   $103.65 
Granted
   26,351   $150.20 
Vested
   (29,055  $104.35 
Forfeited
   (1,300  $97.81 
         
 
    
Non-vested
at December 25, 2021
   56,436   $125.16 
Granted
   25,354   $152.54 
Vested
   (27,074  $122.68 
Forfeited
   (6,921  $144.45 
  
 
    
Non-vested
at December 31, 2022
   47,795   $138.30 
The
Th
e fair value of each share of
non-vested
restricted stock issued and Deferred Stock Unit granted under the Plans is based on the fair value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. Shares of
non-vested
restricted stock are generally subject to vesting in three equal annual installments either on the first, second and third anniversary of the date of grant or the third, fourth and
5
2

Table of Contents
fifth anniversary of the date of the grant, or 100% on the first or fifth anniversary of the date of the grant. For restricted stock awards granted under the 20132022 DSCP plan, each recipient may elect to defer receipt of shares and instead receive restricted stock units (“Deferred Stock Units”), which represent contingent rights to receive shares of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of
5
6

recipient separation from service from the Board of Directors, or, if earlier, upon a change in control event of the Company. Deferred Stock Units become vested 100% on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. Deferred Stock Units do not represent actual ownership in shares of the Company’s Common Stock and the recipient does not have voting rights or other incidents of ownership until the shares are issued. However, Deferred Stock Units do contain the right to receive dividend equivalent payments prior to settlement into shares.
As of December 26, 2020,31, 2022, there was $3,312,000$3,449,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested
shares of restricted stock and Deferred Stock Units granted under the Plans. The unrecognized compensation cost related to these
non-vested
shares of restricted stock and Deferred Stock Units is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years.
Stock Options
The Company did not grant any stock options during its 2018, 20192020, 2021 or 20202022 fiscal years. Options outstanding under the Plans generally become exercisable in either five equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant or 100% on the fifth anniversary from the date of grant, subject to acceleration in certain circumstances. All options granted under the Plans expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. Under the Plans, the exercise price of each option equals the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant.
The fair value of each option grant on its grant date was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company utilized historical data, including exercise patterns and employee departure behavior, in estimating the term that options will be outstanding. Expected volatility was based on historical volatility and other factors, such as expected changes in volatility arising from planned changes to the Company’s business, if any. The risk-free interest rate was based on the yield of zero coupon U.S. Treasury bonds for terms that approximated the terms of the options granted.
The following table summarizes information regarding the Company’s outstanding stock options under the Plans:
 
  
Options Outstanding
   
Options Exercisable
   
Options Outstanding
   
Options Exercisable
 
  
Number of

Options
   
Weighted Average

Exercise Price

per Share
   
Number of

Options
   
Weighted Average

Exercise Price

per Share
 
Options at December 30, 2017
   189,040   $49.34    169,240   $48.50 
Exercised
   (99,926  $48.36       
             
Options at December 29, 2018
   89,114   $50.44    88,114   $50.35 
Exercised
   (44,647  $49.64       
               
Number of

Options
   
Weighted Average

Exercise Price

per Share
   
Number of

Options
   
Weighted Average

Exercise Price

per Share
 
Options at December 28, 2019
   44,467   $51.24    44,467   $51.24    44,467   $51.24    44,467   $51.24 
Exercised
   (26,817  $49.31          (26,817  $49.31       
               
 
          
Options at December 26, 2020
   17,650   $54.16    17,650   $54.16    17,650   $54.16    17,650   $54.16 
Exercised
   (9,080  $52.97       
               
 
          
Options at December 25, 2021
   8,570   $55.42    8,570   $55.42 
Exercised
   (6,670  $55.14       
  
 
          
Options at December 31, 2022
   1,900   $56.40    1,900   $56.40 
  
 
          
The following tables summarizeAll 1,900 stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 26, 2020:
31, 2022 had an exercise price per share of $56.40 and weighted average remaining contractual life of 0.1 years. All 1,900 were exercised
   
Options Outstanding
 
Range of Exercise Prices Per Share
  
Number

Outstanding
   
Weighted Average

Remaining Contractual

Term (years)
   
Weighted Average

Exercise Price

per Share
 
$
 
41.80 - $
 
45.00
   1,500    0.1   $41.80 
$
 
45.01 - $
 
56.40  
   16,150    1.9   $55.31 
                
    17,650    1.7   $54.16 
                
   
Options Exercisable
 
Range of Exercise Prices Per Share
  
Number

Exercisable
   
Weighted Average

Remaining Contractual

Term (years)
   
Weighted Average

Exercise Price

per Share
 
$
 
41.80 - $
 
45.00  
   1,500    0.1   $41.80 
$
 
45.01 - $
 
56.40  
   16,150    1.9   $55.31 
                
    17,650    1.7   $54.16 
                
5
3

, 2023
, following which the Company had no remaining issued and outstanding vested or unvested stock options
At December 26, 2020,31, 2022, the total intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable was $1,433,000.$202,000. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020 2019was $704,000, $965,000 and 2018 was $1,846,000, $2,683,000 and $6,715,000, respectively.
As of December 26, 2020,31, 2022, there was 0no unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested
stock options granted under the Plans.
Directors’ Stock Compensation Plan
Directors of the Company who are not employees of the Company (each an “Eligible Director”) are entitled under the 20132022 DSCP to receive a grant of such number of restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock or Deferred Stock Units equal to the quotient of $110,000 $
150,000
divided by the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date immediately following the date of each annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company (an “Annual Meeting”). Each eligible Director was previously entitled under the 2013 DSCP to receive a grant of such number of restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock or Deferred Stock Units equal to the quotient of $
110,000
divided by the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date immediately following the date of each Annual Meeting. In fiscal year 2022,
7,063
restricted shares were granted to Eligible Directors. In fiscal year 2021,
3,804
restricted
5
7

shares were granted to Eligible Directors. In fiscal year 2020, 4,890 restricted shares and 978 Deferred Stock Units were granted to Eligible Directors. In fiscal year 2019, 5,240 restricted shares and 1,048 Deferred Stock Units were granted to Eligible Directors. In fiscal year 2018, 4,950 restricted shares and 990 Deferred Stock Units were granted to Eligible Directors. Restricted shares and Deferred Stock Units granted in 2018, 20192020, 2021 and 20202022 vest on the date of the next Annual Meeting. During each of fiscal years 2022, 2021 and 2020, 2019$964,000, $669,000 and 2018, $660,000, respectively, of compensation cost was recorded for the grant of these restricted shares and Deferred Stock Units.


(11) Equity
On December 9, 2019,7, 2021, the Landstar System, Inc. Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase up to 1,849,0681,912,824 shares of the Company’s Common Stock from time to time in the open market and in privately negotiated transactions
.
On December 6, 2022, the Landstar System, Inc. Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase up to
1,900,826
additional
shares of the Company’s Common Stock from time to time in the open market and in privately negotiated transactions.
As of December 26, 2020,31, 2022, the Company had authorization to purchase in the aggregate up to 1,821,030
3,000,000
shares of its Common Stock under this program.these programs. No specific expiration date has been assigned to the December 9, 2019 authorization.
7, 2021
or 
December 
6, 2022
authorizations. During fiscal year 2020,2022, Landstar purchased a total of 1,178,970
1,900,826
shares of its Common Stock at a total cost of $115,962,000$
285,983
,000 pursuant to its previously announced stock purchase programs.program.
The Company has 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized and unissued.
(12) Commitments and Contingencies
At December 26, 2020,31, 2022, in addition to the $64,934,000$76,567,000 letters of credit secured by investments, Landstar had $33,618,000$33,493,000 of letters of credit outstanding under the Company’s Credit Agreement.
The Company is involved in certain claims and pending litigation arising from the normal conduct of business. Many of these claims are covered in whole or in part by insurance. Based on knowledge of the facts and, in certain cases, opinions of outside counsel, management believes that adequate provisions have been made for probable losses with respect to the resolution of all such claims and pending litigation and that the ultimate outcome, after provisions therefor, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company, but could have a material effect on the results of operations in a given quarter or year.
(13) Segment Information
Landstar markets its integrated transportation management solutions primarily through independent commission sales agents and exclusively utilizes third party capacity providers to transport customers’ freight. Landstar’s independent commission sales agents enter into contractual arrangements with the Company and are responsible for locating freight, making that freight available to Landstar’s capacity providers and coordinating the transportation of the freight with customers and capacity providers. The Company’s third party capacity providers consist of independent contractors who provide truck capacity to the Company under exclusive lease arrangements (the “BCO Independent Contractors”), unrelated trucking companies who provide truck capacity to the Company under
non-exclusive
contractual arrangements (the “Truck Brokerage Carriers”), air cargo carriers, ocean cargo carriers and railroads. Through this network of agents and capacity providers linked together by Landstar’s seriesecosystem of digital technologies, Landstar operates an integrated transportation management solutions business primarily throughout North America with revenue of $4.1$7.4 billion during the most recently completed fiscal year. The Company reports the results of 2two operating segments: the transportation logistics segment and the insurance segment.
5
4

Table of Contents
The transportation logistics segment provides a wide range of integrated transportation management solutions. Transportation services offered by the Company include truckload, less-than-truckload and less-than-truckloadother truck transportation, rail intermodal, air cargo, ocean cargo, expedited ground and air delivery of time-critical freight, heavy-haul/specialized, U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico cross-border, intra-Mexico, intra-Canada, project cargo and customs brokerage. Examples of the industries serviced by the transportation logistics segment include automotive parts and assemblies,
consumer durables,
building products, metals, chemicals, foodstuffs, heavy machinery, retail, electronics and military equipment. In addition, the transportation logistics segment provides transportation services to other transportation companies, including third party logistics and less-than-truckload service providers. Each of theThe independent commission sales agents has the opportunity to market all of the services provided by the transportation logistics segment. Billings for freight transportation services are typically charged to customers on a per shipment basis for the physical transportation of freight and are referred to as transportation revenue. The results of operations from Landstar Blue Landstar Metro and Landstar ServiciosMetro are presented as part of the Company’s transportation logistics segment.
5
8

Table of Contents
The insurance segment is comprised of Signature Insurance Company (“Signature”), a wholly owned offshore insurance subsidiary, and Risk Management Claim Services, Inc. The insurance segment provides risk and claims management services to certain of Landstar’s operating subsidiaries. In addition, it reinsures certain risks of the Company’s BCO Independent Contractors and provides certain property and casualty insurance directly to certain of Landstar’s operating subsidiaries. Revenue at the insurance segment represents reinsurance premiums from third party insurance companies that provide insurance programs to BCO Independent Contractors where all or a portion of the risk is ultimately borne by Signature. Internal revenue for premiums billed by the insurance segment to the transportation logistics segment is calculated each fiscal period based primarily on an actuarial calculation of historical loss experience and is believed to approximate the cost that would have been incurred by the transportation logistics segment had similar insurance been obtained from an unrelated third party.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates a segment’s performance based on operating income.
NaNNo single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated revenue in fiscal years 2020, 20192022, 2021 and 2018.2020. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue is generated in North America, primarily through customers located in the United States.
5
5

Table of Contents
The following tables summarize information about the Company’s reportable business segments as of and for the fiscal years ending December 26, 2020,31, 2022, December 28, 201925, 2021 and December 29, 201826, 2020 (in thousands):
 
  
Transportation
           
Transportation
         
  
Logistics
   
Insurance
   
Total
   
Logistics
   
Insurance
   
Total
 
2022
         
External revenue
  $7,358,008   $78,554   $7,436,562 
Internal revenue
      79,229    79,229 
Investment income
      3,162    3,162 
Interest and debt expense
   3,620       3,620 
Depreciation and amortization
   57,453       57,453 
Operating income
   524,500    46,583    571,083 
Expenditures on long-lived assets
   26,005       26,005 
Goodwill
   41,220       41,220 
Finance lease additions
   30,659       30,659 
Total assets
   1,704,557    227,322    1,931,879 
2021
         
External revenue
  $6,465,711   $71,857   $6,537,568 
Internal revenue
      62,558    62,558 
Investment income
      2,857    2,857 
Interest and debt expense
   3,976       3,976 
Depreciation and amortization
   49,609       49,609 
Operating income
   464,282    41,386    505,668 
Expenditures on long-lived assets
   23,261       23,261 
Goodwill
   40,768       40,768 
Finance lease additions
   48,674       48,674 
Total assets
   1,736,854    308,611    2,045,465 
2020
                  
External revenue
  $4,076,519   $56,462   $4,132,981   $4,076,519   $56,462   $4,132,981 
Internal revenue
      54,003    54,003       54,003    54,003 
Investment income
      3,399    3,399       3,399    3,399 
Interest and debt expense
   3,953       3,953    3,953       3,953 
Depreciation and amortization
   45,855       45,855    45,855       45,855 
Operating income
   221,210    31,740    252,950    221,210    31,740    252,950 
Expenditures on long-lived assets
   30,626       30,626    30,626       30,626 
Goodwill
   40,949       40,949    40,949       40,949 
Finance lease additions
   31,633       31,633    31,633       31,633 
Total assets
   1,301,991    351,808    1,653,799    1,301,991    351,808    1,653,799 
2019
         
External revenue
  $4,028,336   $56,241   $4,084,577 
Internal revenue
      46,587    46,587 
Investment income
      5,041    5,041 
Interest and debt expense
   3,141       3,141 
Depreciation and amortization
   44,468       44,468 
Operating income
   258,742    40,162    298,904 
Expenditures on long-lived assets
   19,416       19,416 
Goodwill
   38,508       38,508 
Finance lease additions
   29,054       29,054 
Total assets
   1,168,944    258,767    1,427,711 
2018
         
External revenue
  $4,562,796   $52,348   $4,615,144 
Internal revenue
      37,872    37,872 
Investment income
      3,816    3,816 
Interest and debt expense
   3,354       3,354 
Depreciation and amortization
   43,570       43,570 
Operating income
   303,426    28,309    331,735 
Expenditures on long-lived assets
   9,747       9,747 
Goodwill
   38,232       38,232 
Finance lease additions
   46,595       46,595 
Total assets
   1,175,040    205,524    1,380,564 
(14) Change in Accounting Estimate for Self-Insured Claims
Landstar provides for the estimated costs of self-insured claims primarily on an actuarial basis. The amount recorded for the estimated liability for claims incurred is based upon the facts and circumstances known on the applicable balance sheet date. The ultimate resolution of these claims may be for an amount greater or less than the amount estimated by management. The Company continually revises its existing claim estimates as new or revised information becomes available on the status of each claim. Historically, the Company has experienced both favorable and unfavorable development of prior years’ claims estimates.
59

Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the
adverse
effect of the increase in the cost of insurance claims resulting from unfavorable development of prior year self-insured claims estimates on operating income, net income attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary and earnings per share attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary set forth in the consolidated statements of income for the fiscal years ended December 26, 2020,31, 2022, December 28, 201925, 2021 and December 29, 201826, 2020 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
   
Fiscal Years Ended
 
   
December 26,

2020
   
December 28,

2019
   
December 29,

2018
 
Operating income
  $9,196   $16,679   $13,960 
Net income attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary
  $6,989   $12,683   $10,582 
Earnings per share attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary
  $0.18   $0.32   $0.26 
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary
  $0.18   $0.32   $0.26 
5
6

Table of Contents
   
Fiscal Years Ended
 
   
December 31,

2022
   
December 25,

2021
   
December 26,

2020
 
Operating income
  $11,331   $9,708   $9,196 
Net income
  $8,570   $7,359   $6,989 
Diluted earnings per share
  $0.23   $0.19   $0.18 
The unfavorable development of prior years’ claims in the fiscal year
s
ended December 31, 2022 was primarily attributable to several specific claims. The unfavorable development of prior years’ claims in the fiscal year ended December 25, 2021 was primarily attributable to five claims. The unfavorable development of prior years’ claims in the fiscal year ended December 26, 2020 and December 28, 2019
was
attributable
in each year
to several
specific
claims as well as actuarially determined adjustments to prior year commercial trucking loss estimates.
(15) Impairment of Intangible and Other Assets
During the 2020 second fiscal quarter, the Company recorded a
non-cash
impairment charge of $2,582,000 in respect of certain assets, primarily customer contract and related customer relationship intangible assets, acquired on September 20, 2017, along with substantially all of the other assets of the asset-light transportation logistics business of Fletes Avella, S.A. de C.V. (“Fletes Avella”). During the 2020 second fiscal quarter negative macroeconomic trends in Mexico during the first half of 2020, including issues in the international oil and gas sector, caused significant disruptions in the Mexican economy. Accordingly, management performed impairment tests of the carrying values of certain assets that primarily relate to intra-Mexico business acquired as a part of the Fletes Avella acquisition. The impairment tests resulted in an impairment charge of $2,582,000, as the negative macroeconomic trends in Mexico caused
updated
financial projections as of the end of the 2020 second quarter relating to these intangible assets to be substantially below those originally anticipated at the acquisition date. There was no corresponding goodwill impairment charge recorded as the fair value of the Company’s Mexico and cross-border reporting unit continues to significantly exceed its carrying value as of December 26, 2020.31, 2022.
(16) Equity investment
On April 1, 2022, Landstar Investment Holdco, LLC, a newly formed Delaware LLC and wholly owned subsidiary of Landstar System Holdings, Inc., purchased Class A units of Cavnue, LLC, for approximately $4,999,000 in cash consideration. Cavnue, LLC is a privately held company focused on combining technology and road infrastructure to unlock the full potential of connected and autonomous vehicles.
This
non-controlling
investment in units of Cavnue, LLC, is considered an investment in
non-marketable
equity securities without a readily determinable market value. The carrying value of our
non-marketable
equity securities going forward will be adjusted to fair value upon observable transactions for identical or similar investments of the same issuer or impairment (referred to as the measurement alternative).
(17) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2016-13–
Financial Instruments –
Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
(“ASU
2016-13”),
which requires measurement and recognition of expected versus incurred credit losses for financial assets held. The Company adopted ASU
2016-13
on December 29, 2019, under the modified retrospective transition method resulting in a $702,000 cumulative adjustment to retained earnings.
 
56
70

Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Landstar System, Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary (the Company) as of December 26, 202031, 2022 and December 28, 2019,25, 2021, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 26, 2020, December 28, 2019, and December 29, 2018,31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 26, 202031, 2022 and December 28, 2019,25, 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 26, 2020, December 28, 2019, and December 29, 2018,31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 26, 2020,31, 2022, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 23, 202124, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
58

Table of Contents
Self-insurance claims liability
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the liability for insurance claims includes the actuarially determined estimated costs of cargo, property, casualty, general liability, and workers’ compensation claims, both reported and for claims incurred but not reported, up to the Company’s retained amount per claim, which is referred to as the self-insurance claims liability. The Company’s estimated costs of insurance claims include assumptions regarding the frequency and severity of claims and are based upon the facts and circumstances known as of the applicable balance sheet date. The Company’s liability for insurance claims as of December 26, 202031, 2022 was $188,641,000,$109,104,000, which includes the self-insurance claims liability.
61

Table of Contents
We identified the evaluation of the self-insurance claims liability as a critical audit matter. Specialized skills were needed to evaluate the Company’s estimate of the self-insurance claims liability. This evaluation included assumptions related to the potential for the development in future periods of claims both reported and incurred but not reported as of the balance sheet date and the impact of those developments on the estimated liability associated with such claims. In addition, a higher degree of subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate the Company’s estimate of the self-insurance claims liability due to the inherent uncertainty in the frequency and severity of claims.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the Company’s self-insurance claims process, including a control related to the development of the assumptions used to estimate the self-insurance claims liability. We involved actuarial professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in assessing the actuarial model used by the Company, including the external actuarial report obtained by the Company, to estimate the self-insurance claims liability for consistency with generally accepted actuarial standards. The actuarial professionals also developed an estimate of the range of the self-insurance claims liability using the Company’s historical claims data. We compared the estimated range of the self-insurance claims liability to the amount recorded by the Company. We tested a sample of the claims data used in the actuarial model by comparing the data to underlying claims details. For certain claims, we obtained letters received directly from the Company’s external legal counsel to evaluate the liability recorded. Additionally, we assessed the development of the self-insurance claims liability in the current year compared to recent historical trends and considered the implications on the current year assumptions. We also assessed facts and circumstances received by the Company after the balance sheet date, but before the consolidated financial statements were issued, and the impact, if any, of such facts and circumstances on the self-insurance claims liability.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1988.
Jacksonville, Florida
February 23, 202124, 2023
 
59
6
2

Table of Contents
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form
10-K,
an evaluation was carried out, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), who was also serving as the Company’s principal financial officer as of such date, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on that evaluation, the CEO and principal financial officerCFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 26, 202031, 2022 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, Company management recognizes that any disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitation in any control system, no evaluation or implementation of a control system can provide complete assurance that all control issues and all possible instances of fraud have been or will be detected.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
(a) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of Landstar System, Inc. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules
13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
Management, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 26, 2020.31, 2022. This assessment was performed using the criteria established under the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error or circumvention or overriding of internal control. Accordingly, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and reporting and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Based on the assessment performed using the criteria established by COSO, management has concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 26, 2020.31, 2022.
 
60
6
3

Table of Contents
KPMG LLP (PCAOB ID: 185), the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2020,31, 2022, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Such report appears immediately below.
(b) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
61
6
4

Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Landstar System, Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Landstar System, Inc. and subsidiary’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 26, 2020,31, 2022, based on criteria established in
Internal
Control – Integrated Framework (2013)
F
r
a
me
w
ork (20
1
3)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 26, 2020,31, 2022, based on criteria established in
Internal
Con
t
rol ControlIntegratIntegrated Framework (2013)
e
d Fra
m
ew
or
k (20
1
3)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 26, 202031, 2022 and December 28, 2019,25, 2021, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 26, 2020, December 28, 2019, and December 29, 2018,31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 23, 202124, 2023 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
62

Table of Contents
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/KPMG LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
February 23, 202124, 2023
 
6365

(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial financi
al
reporting during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B.
Other Information
On February 23, 2023, the Landstar Board of Directors adopted amendments to the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), effective as of such date. Changes to the Bylaws include revisions that (1) conform provisions concerning the list of stockholders to recent amendments to Section 219(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law and (2) make various other additional amendments and conforming changes that do not materially affect the substance of the Bylaws.
NoneThe foregoing is only a summary of the changes made to the Bylaws, does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Bylaws, which is filed as Exhibit 3.2 to this Annual Report on Form
10-K
and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9C.
64Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
Not applicable.
66

Table of Contents
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this Item concerning the Directors (and nominees for Directors) and Executive Officers of the Company will be set forth under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Directors of the Company,” “Information Regarding Board of Directors and Committees,” and “Executive Officers of the Company” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference. The information required by this Item concerning the Company’s Audit Committee and the Audit Committee’s Financial Expert will be set forth under the caption “Information Regarding Board of Directors and Committees” and “Report of the Audit Committee” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to each of its directors and employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller and all other employees performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on the Company’s website at
www.landstar.com
under “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance.” The Company intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form
8-K
regarding amendments to, or waivers from, a provision or provisions of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct by posting such information on its website at the web address indicated above.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item will be set forth under the captions “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Compensation of Directors,” “Compensation of Named Executive Officers,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Summary Compensation Table,” “Pay Versus Performance Table,” “Grants of Plan-Based Awards,” “Option Exercises and Stock“Stock Vested,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End,” “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation,” “Report of the Compensation“Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation”Reports” and “Key Executive Employment Protection Agreements” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item pursuant to Item 201(d) of Regulation
S-K
is set forth under the caption “Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities” in Part II, Item 5 of this report, and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this Item pursuant to Item 403 of Regulation
S-K
will be set forth under the caption “Security Ownership by Management and Others” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
None, other than information required to be disclosed under this item in regard to Director Independence, which will be set forth under the caption “Independent Directors” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this item will be set forth under the caption “Report of the Audit Committee” and “Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
65
67

PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1)
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
   
Page
 
35
36
37
38
   39 
   40 
41
42
43
44
   5861 
(2)
Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedules have been omitted because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto, or is not applicable or required.
(3)
Exhibits
(3)
Exhibits
 
Exhibit
No.
  
Description
(3)
  
Articles of Incorporation and
By-Laws:
    3.1
  
   3.2
    3.2*
  
(4)
  
Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures:
    4.1 P
  Specimen of Common Stock Certificate. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form
S-1
(Registration
(Registration No. 33-57174))
   4.4
    4.2
  
Description of Securities (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form
10-K
for fiscal year ended December 28, 2019 (Commission File
No. 0-21238))
(10)
  
Material contracts:
  10.1+
  
  10.2+
  Landstar System, Inc. Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 11, 2017 (Commission File No. 0-21238))
    10.3+
Landstar System, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2015 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2014 (Commission File No. 0-21238))
66


  10.5+
  10.4+
  Amended and Restated Landstar System, Inc. 2002 Employee Stock Option and Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on March 23, 2009 (Commission File No. 0-21238))
  10.6+
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Landstar System, Inc. 2002 Employee Stock Option and Stock Incentive Plan, dated February 18, 2016, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 26, 2015 (Commission File No. 0-21238))
  10.7+
Landstar System, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended through December 2, 2015,March 12, 2020, (Incorporated by reference to Appendix BA to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 5, 20166, 2020 (Commission File No. 0-21238))
  10.8+
  10.5+
  
  10.9+
  10.6+
  
  10.10+
  10.7+
  
  10.11+
  10.8+
  Total Shareholder Return Performance Related Stock Award Agreement, dated May 1, 2015, between Landstar System, Inc. and James B. Gattoni (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 19, 2015 (Commission File No. 0-21238))
  10.12+
Total Shareholder Return Performance Related Stock Award Agreement, between Landstar System, Inc. and James B. Gattoni, dated April 24, 2018 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 25, 2018 (Commission File No. 0-21238))
(21)
  10.9+
  
  10.10+
(21)
Subsidiaries of the Registrant:
  21.1*
  
(23)
  
Consents of experts and counsel:
  23.1*
  
(24)
  
Power of attorney:
  24.1*
  
(31)
  
Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:
  31.1*
  
(32)
  31.2*
  
(32)
Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:
  32.1**
  
67

  32.2**
101 *  The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2020,31, 2022, formatted in Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language (iXBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and (vii) Financial Statement Schedule.
  104*
104 *
  Cover Page Interactive Date File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).
69

+
management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
*
Filed herewith.
**
Furnished herewith.
THE COMPANY WILL FURNISH, WITHOUT CHARGE, TO ANY SHAREHOLDER OF THE COMPANY WHO SO REQUESTS IN WRITING, A COPY OF ANY EXHIBITS, AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. ANY SUCH REQUEST SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC., ATTENTION: INVESTOR RELATIONS, 13410 SUTTON PARK DRIVE SOUTH, JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32224.
 
68
70

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
Date: February 23, 202124, 2023  LANDSTAR SYSTEM, INC.
  By: 
/s/ JAMES B. GATTONI
   James B. Gattoni
   
President and
   
Chief Executive Officer
By:/s/ JAMES P. TODD
James P. Todd
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
Signature
  
Title
 
Date
/s/ JAMES B. GATTONI
James B. Gattoni
  President and Chief ExecutiveFebruary 23, 2021
James B. GattoniOfficer; Principal Executive Officer;
Principal Financial Officer; Director February 24, 2023
/s/ JAMES P. TODD
James P. Todd
  Vice President and Corporate ControllerFebruary 23, 2021
James P. Toddof Landstar System Holdings, Inc.;
Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary; Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer February 24, 2023
*
Homaira Akbari
  Director February 23, 2021
Homaira Akbari24, 2023
*
David G. Bannister
  Director February 23, 2021
David G. Bannister24, 2023
*
James L. Liang
DirectorFebruary 24, 2023
*
Diana M. Murphy
  Chairman of the Board February 23, 2021
Diana M. Murphy24, 2023
*
Anthony J. Orlando
  Director February 23, 2021
Anthony J. Orlando24, 2023
*
George P. Scanlon
  Director February 23, 2021
George P. Scanlon24, 2023
*
Teresa L. White
  Director February 23, 2021
Larry J. Thoele24, 2023
By: 
/s/ MICHAEL K. KNELLER
Michael K. Kneller
Attorney In Fact*
6971