Table of Contents


UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FORM
10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20212023
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from    to    
Commission file number
0-12014
IMPERIAL OIL LIMITED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Canada98-0017682
CANADA
(
State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
98-0017682
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
505 QUARRY PARK BOULEVARDQuarry Park Boulevard S.E., CALGARY, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
ABT2C 5N1,
CANADA
(Address of principal executive offices)
T2C 5N1
(Postal Code)
1-800-567-3776
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
1-800-567-3776
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading symbol
Name of each exchange on
which registered
None
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Shares (without par value)
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). Yes ☑ No ☐
Yes
  No......
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes...... Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
  No...... ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T
232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
  No...... ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated
filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filerNon-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company……
Accelerated filer……companyEmerging growth company……
Non-accelerated filer……company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act……
Act ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12
b-2
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes.....Yes ☐ No
As of the last business day of the 20212023 second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates
of the registrant was Canadian $8,092,185,812
$12,036,565,437 based upon the reported last sale price of such stock on the Toronto Stock Exchange on that date.
The number of common shares outstanding, as of February 15, 2022,2024, was 669,143,714.
535,836,803.
1

Table of Contents
Table of contents
Page
5
Item 1.
Business5
Upstream6
6
Present activities13
13
Downstream16
Transportation16
Refining16
Distribution16
Marketing17
Chemical17
Delivery commitments
Human capital resources
Competition18
Government regulations19
Item 1A.
Risk factors22
Item 1B.
Item 2.
1C.
Cybersecurity31
Item 3.
2.
Properties31
Item 3.Legal proceedings
Item 4.31
PART II
Item 5.32
Item 7.
33
Item 7A.
33
Item 8.
34
Item 9.
34
Item 9A.
34
Item 9B.
Other information34
Item 9C.
34
PART III
Item 10.35
Item 11.
Executive compensation35
Item 12.
36
Item 13.
37
Item 14.
38
PART IV
Item 15.39
Item 16.
Form 10-K40 summary
40
41
Item 16.Form 10-K summary42
SIGNATURES
Financial section
Proxy information section111
All dollar amounts set forth in this report are in Canadian dollars, except where otherwise indicated. Note that numbers may not add due to rounding.
2

Table of Contents
Forward-looking statements
Statements of future events or conditions in this report, including projections, targets, expectations, estimates, and business plans are forward-looking statements. Similarly, discussion of roadmaps or future plans related to carbon capture, transportation and storage, biofuel, hydrogen, and other future plans to reduce emissions and emission intensity of the company, its affiliates and third parties are dependent on future market factors, such as continued technological progress, policy support and timely rule-making and permitting, and represent forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as believe, anticipate, intend, propose, plan, goal, seek, project, predict, target, estimate, expect, strategy, outlook, schedule, future, continue, likely, may, should, will and similar references to future periods. Forward-looking statements in this report include, but are not limited to, references to estimates, development, timing and recovery of reserves; the improvement of recovery through experimental operations; the development drilling program at Cold Lake; the timing, cost, efficiency and production of the Aspen projectLeming SAGD and expansion projectGrand Rapids Phase 1 projects at Cold Lake;Lake, and associated emissions intensity reductions; the evaluation and pace of the Aspen project; the timing, pace and results from the EBRT field pilot; the continued evaluation of other oil sands leases and unconventional assets; the company’s intention to market its interest in XTO Energy Canada, and operations continuing as normal throughout marketing process and if it does not result in a sale; the upstream focus on key oil sands assets;leases; future activities with respect to Beaufort Sea licences; the ability for autonomous operations at Kearl to continue capturing productivity improvements, reducing cost and enhancing safety; the impact of the Kearl Boiler Flue Gas heat recovery unit and potential further investment in this technology; the ability to capture additional synergieson reducing greenhouse gas emissions; reduced greenhouse gas emissions from the operatorship transitionLASER technology at Syncrude;Cold Lake; the ability of rail infrastructure to mitigate pipeline capacity constraints; human capital resources strategy and impact; the measures required to comply with environmental regulations; anticipated capital exploration and operating expenditures, including with respect to environmental protection; the structure and effectiveness of the cybersecurity program; continued evaluation of the company’s share purchase program; being well positioned to participate in futuresubstantial investments to develop Canadian energy supplies and reduce commodity price risk; the company’s long-term business outlook including demand, supply and energy mix and pathways related to greenhouse gas emissions; the impact of participation in the Pathways alliance; Imperial’s Scopecompany-wide net-zero goal by 2050 (Scope 1 and 2 net zero goal by 20502) and the company’s greenhouse gas emissions intensity goalsgoal for 2023 and 2030 for its oil sands operations; the impact of participation in the Oil Sands Pathways to Net Zero alliance; market uncertainty and the extent of ongoing effects of the
COVID-19
pandemic on economic activity andglobal events affecting supply and demand; the impact of measures implemented by the company in response to COVID-19;demand, including inflation, and uncertainty in global economic recovery, and the company’s ability to mitigate related cost impacts; segment growth, competitive strategiesimpacts in all price environments; upstream focus on optimization within existing assets, cost reduction opportunities and benefits from an integrated business model;productivity enhancements; the ability of the company’s current investment strategy of value and select volume growth to deliver robust returns and support long term growth; continued evaluation of opportunities such as rail shipments and pace of the Aspen project; segment growth, competitive strategies and benefits from an integrated business model; the impact of Downstream strategies and competitive position; the timing, production and emissions reductions from the renewable diesel facility at Strathcona; potential impacts from environmental risks, carbon policy, climate related regulations and biofuels mandates; Chemical competitive position and the benefits to the Chemical business from integration with the Sarnia refinery and relationship with ExxonMobil; capital structure and financial strength as a competitive advantage, for risk mitigation and meeting funding requirements; expected full year capital expenditures of about $1.4$1.7 billion for 2022;2024; earnings sensitivities; risks associated with use of derivative instruments; the impact of any pending litigation, accounting standards and unrecognized tax benefits; the effectiveness of the company’s compensation plan in long term performance and mitigating risk; standardized measures of discounted future cash flows; anticipated productivitythe effectiveness of the company's corporate governance practices, including with respect to risk management and greenhouse gas emissions intensity benefits fromoversight; and the LASER project at Cold Lake; theprogress and impact of the Sarnia products pipeline;various initiatives including with E3 Lithium and plans to construct ausing renewable diesel facility at Strathcona, including timing of a final investment decision.Kearl.
Forward-looking statements are based on the company’s current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions at the time the statements are made. Actual future financial and operating results, including expectations and assumptions concerning future energy demand, supply and mix; commodity prices and foreign exchange rates and general market conditions;rates; production rates, growth and mix across various assets; production life, resource recoveries and reservoir performance; project plans, timing, costs, technical evaluations and capacities, and the company’s ability to effectively execute on these plans and operate its assets; production life, resource recoveriesassets, including its investment in the renewable diesel complex at Strathcona, the Leming, Grand Rapids and reservoir performance; plans to mitigate climate riskLASER projects at Cold Lake, and the resilience of company strategy to a range of pathways for society’s energy transition;autonomous operations at Kearl; the adoption and impact of new facilities or technologies on capital efficiency, production and reductions to greenhouse gasGHG emissions intensity, including but not limited to next generation technologies using solvents to replace energy intensive steam at Cold Lake, the EBRT project, boiler flue gas technology at Kearl, Strathcona’sStrathcona renewable diesel, complex and support for and advancement of carbon capture and storage including in connection with hydrogen for the renewable diesel project, recovery technologies and efficiency projects, and any changes in the scope, terms, or costs of such projects; the amount and timing of emissions reductions; that any required support from policymakers and other stakeholders for various new technologies such as carbon capture and storage will be provided; for renewable diesel, the availability and cost of locally-sourced and grown feedstock and the supply of renewable diesel to British Columbia in connection with its low-carbon fuel legislation; the amount and timing of emissions reductions, including the impact of lower carbon fuels; performance of third party service providers;
3

receipt of regulatory and third party approvals in a timely manner, especially with respect to large scale emissions reduction projects; applicable laws and government policies, including taxation, restrictions in response to COVID-19 and with respect to climate change, GHG emissions reductions and greenhouse gas emissions reductions; receipt of regulatory approvals; performance of third-party service providers;low carbon fuels; refinery utilization and product sales; the ability to offset any ongoing inflationary pressures; cash generation, financing sources and capital structure, such as dividends and shareholder returns, including the timing and amounts of share repurchases; capital and environmental expenditures; evolutionprogression of COVID-19 and its impacts on Imperial’s ability to operate its assets; capital and environmental expenditures; the capture of efficiencies within and between business lines and the company’s ability to effectively execute on its business continuity plansmaintain near-term cost reductions as ongoing efficiencies; and pandemic response activitiesgeneral market conditions could differ materially depending on a number of factors.
3

Table of Contents
These factors include global, regional or local changes in supply and demand for oil, natural gas, petroleum and petrochemical products, feedstocks and other market orfactors, economic conditions and seasonal fluctuations and resulting demand, price, differential and margin impacts; transportation for accessing markets; political or regulatory events, including changes in law or government policy, applicable royalty rates, and tax laws and actions in response to
COVID-19;
environmental risks inherent in oil and gas activities;including taxes on share repurchases; environmental regulation, including climate change and greenhouse gas regulation and changes to such regulation; environmental risks inherent in oil and gas activities; government policies supporting lower carbon investment opportunities; failure, delay or delay ofuncertainty regarding supportive policy and market development for the adoption of emerging lower emissionlower-emission energy technologies;technologies and other technologies that support emissions reductions; the receipt, in a timely manner, of regulatory and third-party approvals;approvals, including for new technologies that will help the company meet its lower emissions goals; third-party opposition to company and service provider operations, projects and infrastructure; availability and allocation of capital; availability and performance of third-party service providers, including in light of restrictions related to
COVID-19;
providers; unanticipated technical or operational difficulties; management effectiveness and disaster response preparedness, including business continuity plans in response to
COVID-19;
commercial negotiations;preparedness; project management and schedules and timely completion of projects; transportation for accessing markets; commercial negotiations; unexpected technological developments; the results of research programs and new technologies, including with respect to greenhouse gas emissions, and the ability to bring new technologies to commercial scale on a cost-competitive basis;basis, and the competitiveness of alternative energy and other emission reduction technologies; reservoir analysis and performance; the ability to develop or acquire additional reserves; operational hazards and risks; cybersecurity incidents; currency exchange rates; the occurrence, pace, rate of regionalrecovery and global economic recoveryeffects of public health crises, including the responses from the COVID-19 pandemic and the occurrence and severity of future outbreaks and variants;governments; general economic conditions, including inflation and the occurrence and duration of economic recessions;recessions or downturns; and other factors discussed in Item"Item 1A “Risk factors”Risk factors" and Item"Item 7 “Management’sManagement’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations”operations" in this annual report on Form 10-K.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, some that are similar to other oil and gas companies and some that are unique to Imperial Oil Limited. Imperial Oil Limited’sImperial’s actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by its forward-looking statements and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on them. Imperial Oil Limited undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained herein, except as required by applicable law.
Forward-looking and other statements regarding Imperial's environmental, social and other sustainability efforts and aspirations are not an indication that these statements are material to investors or require disclosure in the company's filings with securities regulators. In addition, historical, current and forward-looking environmental, social and sustainability-related statements may be based on standards for measuring progress that are still developing, internal controls and processes that continue to evolve, and assumptions that are subject to change in the future, including future rule-making.
Energy demand models are forward-looking by nature and aim to replicate system dynamics of the global energy system, requiring simplifications. The reference to any scenario in this report, including any potential net-zero scenarios, does not imply Imperial views any particular scenario as likely to occur. In addition, energy demand scenarios require assumptions on a variety of parameters. As such, the outcome of any given scenario using an energy demand model comes with a high degree of uncertainty. For example, the IEA describes its NZE scenario as extremely challenging, requiring unprecedented innovation, unprecedented international cooperation and sustained support and participation from consumers. Third-party scenarios discussed in this report reflect the modeling assumptions and outputs of their respective authors, not Imperial, and their use by Imperial is not an endorsement by the company of their underlying assumptions, likelihood or probability. Investment decisions are made on the basis of Imperial’s separate planning process, but may be secondarily tested for robustness or resiliency against different assumptions, including against various scenarios.process. Any use of the modeling of a third-party organization within this report does not constitute or imply an endorsement by Imperial of any or all of the positions or activities of such organization.
Actions needed to advance the company’s 2030 greenhouse gas emission-reductions plans are incorporated into its medium-term business plans, which are updated annually. The reference case for planning beyond 2030 is based on the ExxonMobil’s Global Outlook (the Outlook) research and publication. The Outlook is reflective of the existing global policy environment and an assumption of increasing policy stringency and technology improvement to 2050. However, the Outlook does not attempt to project the degree of required future policy and
4

technology advancement and deployment for the world or the company, to meet net zero by 2050. As future policies and technology advancements emerge, they will be incorporated into the Outlook, and the Company’s business plans will be updated accordingly. References to projects or opportunities may not reflect investment decisions made by the company. Individual projects or opportunities may advance based on a number of factors, including availability of supportive policy, permitting, technological advancement for cost-effective abatement, insights from the company planning process, and alignment with partners and other stakeholders. Capital investment guidance in lower-emission investments is based on our corporate plan; however, actual investment levels will be subject to the availability of the opportunity set, public policy support, and focused on returns.
The term “project” as used in this report can refer to a variety of different activities and does not necessarily have the same meaning as in any government payment transparency reports.

4
5

Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Business

Imperial Oil Limited was incorporated under the laws of Canada in 1880 and was continued under the
Canada Business Corporations Act
(the “CBCA”
(the "CBCA") by certificate of continuance dated April 24, 1978. The head and principal office of the company is located at 505 Quarry Park Boulevard S.E., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2C 5N1. Exxon Mobil Corporation (“ExxonMobil”("ExxonMobil") owns approximately 69.6 percent of the outstanding shares of the company. In this report, unless the context otherwise indicates, reference to the “company”"company" or “Imperial”"Imperial" includes Imperial Oil Limited and its subsidiaries, and reference to ExxonMobil includes Exxon Mobil Corporation and its affiliates, as appropriate.
The company is one of Canada’s largest integrated oil companies. It is active in all phases of the petroleum industry in Canada, including the exploration for, and production and sale of, crude oil and natural gas. In Canada, it is a major producer of crude oil, the largest petroleum refiner, a leading marketer of petroleum products, and a major producer of petrochemicals. The company also pursues lower-emission business opportunities including carbon capture and storage, hydrogen and biofuels.lower-emission fuels.
The company’s operations are conducted in three main segments: Upstream, Downstream and Chemical. Upstream operations include the exploration for, and production of, crude oil, natural gas, synthetic crude oil and bitumen. Downstream operations consist of the transportation and refining of crude oil, blending of refined products and the distribution and marketing of those products. Chemical operations consist of the manufacturing and marketing of various petrochemicals.
Operating data and financial information about the company’s business segments are contained in this report under the following: “Management’s"Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations”operations" and the “Financial section”"Financial section" under note 2 to the consolidated financial statements: “Business segments”"Business segments".

5
6

Table of Contents
Upstream
Disclosure of reserves
Summary of oil and gas reserves at
year-end
The table below summarizes the net proved reserves for the company, as at December 31, 2021,2023, as detailed in the “Supplemental"Supplemental information on oil and gas exploration and production activities” part ofactivities" in the “Financial section”, starting on page 42"Financial section" of this report.
All of the company’s reported reserves are located in Canada. The company has reported proved reserves based on the average of the
first-day-of-the-month
price for each month during the last
12-month
period endingended December 31. Natural gas is converted to an
oil-equivalent
basis at six million cubic feet per one thousand barrels. No major discovery or other favourable or adverse event has occurred since December 31, 20212023 that would cause a significant change in the estimated proved reserves as of that date.
 
Liquids (a)
Natural gasSynthetic
crude oil
BitumenTotal
oil-equivalent
basis
 
millions of
barrels
billions of
cubic feet
millions of
barrels
millions of
barrels
millions of
barrels
Net proved reserves:
Developed 53 242 1,706 1,957 
Undeveloped 8 112 105 218 
Total net proved 61 354 1,811 2,175 
(a)Liquids include crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids (NGLs). NGL proved reserves are not material and are therefore included under liquids.
   Liquids 
(a)
   Natural gas   Synthetic oil   Bitumen   Total
oil-equivalent

basis
 
   millions of
barrels
   billions of
cubic feet
   millions of
barrels
   millions of
barrels
   millions of
barrels
 
Net proved reserves:
          
Developed
  
 
14
 
  
 
205
 
  
 
326
 
  
 
1,957
 
  
 
2,331
 
Undeveloped
  
 
2
 
  
 
76
 
  
 
112
 
  
 
259
 
  
 
386
 
Total net proved
  
 
16
 
  
 
281
 
  
 
438
 
  
 
2,216
 
  
 
2,717
 
(a)
Liquids include crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids (NGLs). NGL proved reserves are not material and are therefore included under liquids.
The estimation of proved reserve volumes, which is based on the requirement of reasonable certainty, is an ongoing process based on rigorous technical evaluations, commercial and market assessments, detailed analysis of well information such as flow rates and reservoir pressures, and development and production costs, and other factors. Furthermore, the company only records proved reserves for projects which have received significant funding commitments by management made toward the development of the reserves. Although the company is reasonably certain that proved reserves will be produced, the timing and amount recovered can be affected by a number of factors, including completion and optimization of development projects, reservoir performance, regulatory approvals, government policies, consumer preferences, changes in the amount and timing of capital investments, royalty frameworks and significant changes in oil and gas price levels. In addition, proved reserves could be affected by an extended period of low prices which could reduce the level of the company’s capital spending and also impact its partners’ capacity to fund their share of joint projects.
As a result of improved prices in 2021, under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission definition of proved reserves, an additional 1.7 billion barrels of bitumen at Kearl and 0.5 billion barrels of bitumen at Cold Lake qualified as proved reserves at
year-end
2021.
6

Technologies used in establishing proved reserves estimates
Imperial’s proved reserves in 20212023 were based on estimates generated through the integration of available and appropriate geological, engineering and production data, utilizing well established technologies that have been demonstrated in the field to yield repeatable and consistent results.
Data used in these integrated assessments included information obtained directly from the subsurface via wellbores, such as well logs, reservoir core samples, fluid samples, static and dynamic pressure information, production test data, and surveillance and performance information. The data utilized also included subsurface information obtained through indirect measurements, including seismic data, calibrated with available well control information. The tools used to interpret the data included seismic processing software, reservoir modeling and simulation software, and data analysis packages.
In some circumstances, where appropriate analog reservoirs were available, reservoir parameters from these analogs were used to increase the quality of and confidence in the reserves estimates.


7

Preparation of reserves estimates
Imperial has a dedicated reserves management group that is separate from the base operating organization. Primary responsibilities of this group include oversight of the reserves estimation process for compliance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations, review of annual changes in reserves estimates and the reporting of Imperial’sthe company’s proved reserves. This group also maintains the official reserves estimates for Imperial’s proved reserves. In addition, this group provides training to personnel involved in the reserve estimation and reporting processes within Imperial.
The reserves management group maintains a central database containing the company’s official reserves estimates. Appropriate controls, including limitations on database access and update capabilities, are in place to ensure data integrity within this central database. An annual review of the system’s controls is performed by internal audit. Key components of the reserves estimation process include technical evaluations, commercial and market assessments, analysis of well and field performance, and long standinglong-standing approval guidelines. No changes may be made to reserves estimates in the central database, including the addition of any new initial reserves estimates or subsequent revisions, unless those changes have been thoroughly reviewed and evaluated by duly authorized personnel within the base operating organization. In addition, changes to reserves estimates that exceed certain thresholds require further review and endorsement by the operating organization and the reserves management group, culminating in reviews with and approval by senior management and the company’s board of directors.
The internal qualified reserves evaluator is a professional geoscientist registered in Alberta, Canada and has 1921 years of petroleum industry experience, including 1012 years of reserves related experience. The position provides leadership to the internal reserves management group and is responsible for filing a reserves report with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities. The company’s internal reserves evaluation staff consists of 2518 persons with an average of 1114 years of relevant technical experience in evaluating reserves, of whom 2217 persons are qualified reserves evaluators for purposes of Canadian securities regulatory requirements. The company’s internal reserves evaluation management team is made up of 1315 persons with an average of 119 years of relevant experience in evaluating and managing the evaluation of reserves.
7

Proved undeveloped reserves
As at December 31, 2021,2023, approximately 1410 percent of the company’s proved reserves were proved undeveloped reflecting volumes of 386218 million
oil-equivalent
barrels. Proved undeveloped reserves are associated with Syncrude, Kearl and Cold Lake, and the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets.Lake. This compared to 138240 million
oil-equivalent
barrels of proved undeveloped reserves reported at the end of 2020.2022. The increasedecrease of 24822 million
oil-equivalent
barrels of proved undeveloped reserves includes an increaseis mainly attributed to the migration of 262 million oil-equivalent barrels at Cold Lake an increase of 6 million
oil-equivalent
barrels at the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets, partially offset by a decrease of 20 million
oil-equivalent
barrels at Syncrude. Conversion of proved undeveloped reserves intoto proved developed was 34 million
oil-equivalent
barrels during 2021, associated with Cold Lakereserves following infill development drilling and the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets.start-up of the Grand Rapids Phase 1 project.
ProvedAs at December 31, 2023 there were no proved undeveloped reserves that have remained undeveloped for five years or more represent about 53 percent (204 million
oil-equivalentmore.
barrels) of proved undeveloped reserves and are associated with ongoing development programs at Cold Lake. These undeveloped reserves are planned to be developed in a staged approach to align with operational capacity and efficient capital spending commitment over the life of the asset. The company is reasonably certain that these proved reserves will be produced; however the timing and amount recovered can be affected by a number of factors including completion and optimization of development projects, reservoir performance, regulatory approvals, government policies, consumer preferences, changes in the amount and timing of capital investments, royalty frameworks and significant changes in oil and gas price levels.
One of the company’s requirements to report resources as proved reserves is that management has made significant funding commitments towards the development of the reserves. The company has a disciplined investment strategy and many major fields require a long lead-time in order to be developed. The company made investments of about $124$391 million during the year to progress the development of proved undeveloped reserves at Cold Lake, SyncrudeKearl and the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets.Syncrude. These investments represented about 2035 percent of the $632$1,108 million in total reported Upstream capital and exploration expenditures.


8

Table of Contents
Oil and gas production, production prices and production costs
Reference is made to the portion of the “Financial section”"Financial section" entitled “Management’s"Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” on page 48operations" of this report for a narrative discussion on the material changes.
Average daily production of oil
The company’s average daily oil production by final products sold during the three years ended December 31, 20212023 was as follows. All reported production volumes were from Canada.

thousands of barrels per day (a)2023 2022 2021 
Bitumen:
Kearl:
- gross (b)
191 172 186 
- net (c)
177 157 178 
Cold Lake:
- gross (b)
135 144 140 
- net (c)
106 106 114 
Total bitumen:
- gross (b)
326 316 326 
- net (c)
283 263 292 
Synthetic crude oil (d):
- gross (b)
76 77 71 
- net (c)
67 63 62 
Liquids (e):
- gross (b)
5 11 
- net (c)
5 10 
Total:
- gross (b)
407 402 408 
- net (c)
355 335 364 
(a)Volume per day metrics are calculated by dividing the volume for the period by the number of calendar days in the period.
(b)Gross production is the company’s share of production (excluding purchases) before deduction of the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
(c)Net production is gross production less the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
(d)The company’s synthetic crude oil production volumes were from the company’s share of production volumes in the Syncrude joint venture and include immaterial amounts of bitumen and other products exported to the operator's facilities using an existing interconnect pipeline.
(e)Liquids include crude oil, condensate and NGLs.
thousands of barrels per day (a)
 
 
2021
 
     2020      2019 
Bitumen:
           
Kearl:
  
- gross
(b)
 
 
186
 
     158      145 
  
- net
(c)
 
 
178
 
     155      140 
Cold Lake:
  
- gross
(b)
 
 
140
 
     132      140 
   
- net
(c)
 
 
114
 
     124      114 
Total bitumen:
  
- gross
(b)
 
 
326
 
     290      285 
  
- net
(c)
 
 
292
 
     279      254 
Synthetic oil 
(d)
:
  
- gross
(b)
 
 
71
 
     69      73 
  
- net
(c)
 
 
62
 
     68      65 
Liquids
(e)
:
  
- gross
(b)
 
 
11
 
     13      16 
   
- net
(c)
 
 
10
 
     12      14 
Total:
  
- gross
(b)
 
 
408
 
     372      374 
   
- net
(c)
 
 
364
 
     359      333 
(a)
Volume per day metrics are calculated by dividing the volume for the period by the number of calendar days in the period.
(b)
Gross production is the company’s share of production (excluding purchases) before deduction of the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
(c)
Net production is gross production less the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
(d)
The company’s synthetic oil production volumes were from the company’s share of production volumes in the Syncrude joint venture.
(e)
Liquids include crude oil, condensate and NGLs.
Average daily production and production available for sale of natural gas
The company’s average daily production and production available for sale of natural gas during the three years ended December 31, 20212023 are set forth below. All reported production volumes were from Canada. All gas volumes in this reportCanada and are calculated at a pressure base of 14.73 pounds per square inch absolute at 60 degrees Fahrenheit. Reference is made to the portion of the “Financial section”"Financial section" entitled “Management’s"Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” on page 48operations" of this report for a narrative discussion on the material changes.

millions of cubic feet per day (a)2023 2022 2021 
Gross production (b) (c)
33 85 120 
Net production (c) (d) (e)
32 83 115 
Net production available for sale (f)
11 50 81 
(a)Volume per day metrics are calculated by dividing the volume for the period by the number of calendar days in the period.
(b)Gross production is the company’s share of production (excluding purchases) before deduction of the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
(c)Production of natural gas includes amounts used for internal consumption with the exception of the amounts reinjected.
(d)Net production is gross production less the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
(e)Net production reported in the above table is consistent with production quantities in the net proved reserves disclosure.
(f)Includes sales of the company’s share of net production and excludes amounts used for internal consumption.



millions of cubic feet per day (a)
 
 
2021
 
     2020      2019 
Gross production
(b) (c)
 
 
120
 
     154      145 
Net production
(c) (d) (e)
 
 
115
 
     150      144 
Net production available for sale
(f)
 
 
81
 
     115      108 
(a)
Volume per day metrics are calculated by dividing the volume for the period by the number of calendar days in the period.
(b)
Gross production is the company’s share of production (excluding purchases) before deduction of the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
(c)
Production of natural gas includes amounts used for internal consumption with the exception of the amounts reinjected.
(d)
Net production is gross production less the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
(e)
Net production reported in the above table is consistent with production quantities in the net proved reserves disclosure.
(f)
Includes sales of the company’s share of net production and excludes amounts used for internal consumption.
9

Total average daily
oil-equivalent
basis production
The company’s total average daily production expressed in an
oil-equivalent
basis is set forth below, with natural gas converted to an
oil-equivalent
basis at six million cubic feet per one thousand barrels.

thousands of barrels per day (a)2023 2022 2021 
Total production oil-equivalent basis:
gross (b)
413 416 428 
net (c)
360 349 383 
(a)Volume per day metrics are calculated by dividing the volume for the period by the number of calendar days in the period.
(b)Gross production is the company’s share of production (excluding purchases) before deduction of the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
(c)Net production is gross production less the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
thousands of barrels per day (a)
  
 
2021
 
     2020      2019 
Total production
oil-equivalent
basis:
          
- gross
(b)
  
 
428
 
     398      398 
- net
(c)
  
 
383
 
     384      357 
(a)
Volume per day metrics are calculated by dividing the volume for the period by the number of calendar days in the period.
(b)
Gross production is the company’s share of production (excluding purchases) before deduction of the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
(c)
Net production is gross production less the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
Average unit sales price
The company’s average unit sales price and average unit production costs by product type for the three years ended December 31, 20212023 were as follows.

Canadian dollars per barrel2023 2022 2021 
Bitumen67.42 84.67 57.91 
Synthetic crude oil105.57 125.46 81.61 
Liquids (a)
59.30 93.77 59.41 
Canadian dollars per thousand cubic feet
Natural gas2.58 5.69 3.83 
(a)Liquids include crude oil, condensate and NGLs.
Canadian dollars per barrel
  
 
2021
 
     2020      2019 
Bitumen
  
 
57.91
 
     25.69      50.02 
Synthetic oil
  
 
81.61
 
     49.76      74.47 
Liquids
(a)
  
 
59.41
 
     27.40      42.91 
Canadian dollars per thousand cubic feet
          
Natural gas
  
 
3.83
 
     1.90      2.05 
(a)
Liquids include crude oil, condensate and NGLs.
In 2021,2023, Imperial's average Canadian dollar realization for bitumen decreased generally in line with Western Canada Select (WCS). The company's average Canadian dollar realizations for synthetic crude oil decreased generally in line with West Texas Intermediate (WTI), adjusted for changes in exchange rates and transportation costs and reflect a premium over WTI driven by supply and demand.
In 2022, Imperial’s average Canadian dollar realizationsrealization for bitumen increased generally in line with Western Canada Select (WCS). The company’s average Canadian dollar realizations for synthetic crude oil increased generally in line with West Texas Intermediate (WTI), adjusted for changes in exchange rates and transportation costs.
costs and reflect a premium over WTI driven by supply and demand.
In 2020, Imperial’s average Canadian dollar realizations for bitumen decreased primarily due to a decrease in WCS. The company’s average Canadian dollar realizations for synthetic crude decreased generally in line with WTI, adjusted for changes in exchange rates and transportation costs.
Average unit production costs

Canadian dollars per barrel2023 2022 2021 
Bitumen32.41 39.05 29.06 
Synthetic crude oil62.57 68.00 61.97 
Total oil-equivalent basis (a)
38.51 44.02 34.32 
(a)Includes liquids, bitumen, synthetic crude oil and natural gas.
Canadian dollars per barrel
  
 
2021
 
     2020      2019 
Bitumen
  
 
29.06
 
     25.73      31.53 
Synthetic oil
  
 
61.97
 
     45.51      54.44 
Total
oil-equivalent
basis
(a)
  
 
34.32
 
     28.73      34.82 
(a)
Includes liquids, bitumen, synthetic oil and natural gas.
In 2021,2023, bitumen unit production costs were higher,decreased, primarily driven by higherlower energy costs.
In 2021, synthetic oil unit production costs were higher, primarily driven by higher maintenance costs and mine tailings spend.
In 2020, bitumen unit production costs were lower, primarily driven by higher Kearl production due to improved reliability, plant capacity utilization, and reduced downtime related to the addition of supplemental crushing facilities in 2020, and cost saving activities in response to market conditions.mine equipment productivity.
In 2020,2023, synthetic crude oil unit production costs were lower,decreased, primarily driven by cost saving activities in response tohigher net production.
In 2022, bitumen unit production costs increased, primarily driven by higher energy costs.
In 2022, synthetic crude oil unit production costs increased, primarily driven by higher energy costs.

market conditions.
10

Table of Contents
Drilling and other exploratory and development activities
The company has been involved in the exploration for and development of crude oil and natural gas in Canada only.
Wells drilled
The following table sets forth the net exploratory and development wells that were drilled or participated in by the company during the three years ended December 31, 2021.
2023.
wells
  
 
2021
 
     2020      2019 
Net productive exploratory
  
 
-
 
     -      - 
Net dry exploratory
  
 
-
 
     -      - 
Net productive development
  
 
13
 
     29      28 
Net dry development
  
 
-
 
     -      - 
Total
  
 
13
 
     29      28 

wells2023 2022 2021 
Net productive exploratory — — 
Net dry exploratory — — 
Net productive development32 24 13 
Net dry development — — 
Total32 24 13 
In 2021,2023, wells drilled to add productive capacity include 1232 development wells at Cold Lake and 1 well associated with the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets.Lake.
In 2020,2022, wells drilled to add productive capacity include 2824 development wells at Cold Lake and 1 well associated withLake.
Wells drilling
At December 31, 2023, the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets.
In 2019,company was drilling the following development wells drilled to add productive capacity include 14 development wells at Cold Lake and 14 wells associated with the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets.
Wells drilling
At December 31, 2021, the company was participating in the drilling of the following exploratory and development wells within the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets.Lake. All wells were located in Canada.

2023
WellsGrossNet
Total11 11 
      
 
2021
 
    
Wells
  Gross           Net
Total
  
16
           
7
Exploratory and development activities regarding oil and gas resources

Cold Lake
To maintain production at Cold Lake, capital expenditures for additional production wells and associated facilities are required periodically. In 2021,2023, additional wells were drilled on existing phases.phases, as well as development drilling to add productive capacity. In 2022,2024, a development drilling program is planned within the approved development area to add productive capacity.
Additionally, in 2022, the company approved the budget for the Leming Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) project that will re-develop the original pilot area of the Cold Lake field, with development activities having commenced in 2023 and start-up planned in 2025.
In August 2018, Imperial received regulatory approval from the Alberta Energy Regulator for an expansion project at Cold Lake to develop the Grand Rapids interval using Solvent Assisted - Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SA-SAGD)technology, capable of producing 50,000 barrels per day before royalties. The company is developing the Grand Rapids reservoir through capital-efficient investments that make use of available steam capacity from existing plants, with the initial phase of Grand Rapids development planned as an extension from the Nabiye plant. In April 2022, the Grand Rapids Phase 1 (GRP1) project was approved by the company's board with a forecasted average production of 15,000 barrels per day before royalties. The initial steam injection phase started in December 2023 and is expected to last until the end of the first quarter of 2024, with production ramping up over the following months.
The company also conducts experimental pilot operations to improve recovery of bitumen from wells by means of new drilling, production or recovery techniques.



11

Aspen Cold Lake expansion and other in-situ oil sands activities
In October 2018, the company received regulatory approval for the Aspen solvent-assisted, steam-assisted gravity drainage
(SA-SAGD)
SA-SAGD project from the Alberta Energy Regulator. Development was proposed to occur in two phases, each producing about 75,000 barrels per day, before royalties. The first phase of the project was approved by the company’s board, and appropriated for $2.6 billion. Construction began late in the fourth quarter of 2018. In March 2019, the company slowed the pace of development given market uncertainty stemming from the Government of Alberta’s temporary mandatory production curtailment regulations and other industry competitiveness challenges. Although the Government of Alberta repealed the regulatory authority for imposing temporary production curtailments at the end of 2021, major investment remains on hold.hold due to continued market uncertainty. Aspen’s project pace will continue to be evaluated and remains an important opportunity for Imperial. The Enhanced Bitumen Recovery Technology (EBRT) field pilot on the Aspen lease received funding approval in 2023, with development work underway for pilot startup by 2027. The pilot will test technology that has the potential to deliver higher bitumen production rates and lower greenhouse gas emissions as compared to industry average SAGD operations.
11

In August 2018, Imperial received regulatory approval from the Alberta Energy Regulator for an expansion project at Cold Lake to develop the Grand Rapids interval using
SA-SAGD
technology, capable of producing 50,000 barrels per day before royalties. Imperial intends to develop the Grand Rapids reservoir through capital-efficient investments that make use of available steam capacity from existing plants, with the initial phase of Grand Rapids development planned as an extension from the Nabiye plant. Imperial continues to progress this opportunity.
Work progresses on technical and technology evaluations to support potential Clarke Creek, Corner, Clyden and Chard
in-situ
development regulatory applications.
The company also has interests in other oil sands leases in the Athabasca region of northern Alberta. Evaluation wells completed on these leased areas established the presence of bitumen. The company continues to evaluate these leases to determine their potential for future development.
Montney and Duvernay
The company owns a 50 percent interest in XTO Energy Canada which includes the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets located in central Alberta. In 2020, the company ramped down development drilling and revised long-term development plans to exclude a significant portion of the
non-core,
non-producing
and undeveloped areas of the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets. In 2021, the company resumed limited drilling activity to develop select portions of the acreage with other operators. In January 2022, Imperial announced its intention to market its interest in XTO Energy Canada jointly with ExxonMobil Canada, consistent with Imperial’s strategy to focus its upstream resources and efforts on its key oil sands assets. A definitive decision to sell the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets has not been made. Operations will continue as normal throughout the marketing process and should the process not result in a sale. XTO Energy Canada net production from these assets is about 140 million cubic feet of natural gas per day and about 9,000 barrels per day of crude, condensate and natural gas liquids.
Beaufort Sea
The company holds a 25 percent interest in two exploration licences in the Beaufort Sea. In 2016, the Federal Government of Canada declared Arctic waters off limits to new offshore oil and gas licences for five years subject to review at the end of that period. Existing licences were not impacted. In June 2019, the Federal Government approved selective changes to the
Canada Petroleum Resources Act
to prohibit and freeze the existing licences throughlicences. In 2023, the completion of the Beaufort Sea Regional Environmental Assessment
(BR-SEA)
review. In 2021, theWestern Arctic - Tariuq (Offshore) Accord was signed and prohibition was extended untilto December 31, 2022, during which time the2028. The Federal Government will continueplans to consult with stakeholders as partco-develop a climate and marine science-based review of the
BR-SEA
review to address regional social, environmental, economic and spill response impacts of natural resource development in the Arctic. moratorium. The company continues to hold the licences while maintaining community engagement and participation in the
BR-SEA process.
process.
Exploratory and development activities regarding oil and gas resources extracted by mining methods
The company continues to evaluate other undeveloped, mineable oil sands acreage in the Athabasca region.




12

Table of Contents
Present activities
Review of principal ongoing activities
Kearl
Kearl is a joint venture established to recover shallow deposits of oil sands using
open-pit
mining methods to extract the crude bitumen, which is processed through extraction and froth treatment trains. The company holds a 70.96 percent participating interest in the joint venture and ExxonMobil Canada Properties holds the other 29.04 percent. The product, a blend of bitumen and diluent, is typically shipped to the company’s refineries, Exxon Mobil Corporation refineries and to other third parties. Diluent is natural gas condensate or other light hydrocarbons added to the crude bitumen to facilitate transportation by pipeline and rail.
During 2021,2023, the company’s share of Kearl’s net bitumen production was about 178,000177,000 barrels per day and gross production was about 186,000191,000 barrels per day.
Total gross production for Kearl was about 263,000270,000 barrels per day (186,000(191,000 barrels Imperial’s share), setting a new record for Kearl and continuing multi-year improvements in reliability, costs and performance. Total gross production increased about 41,000up 28,000 barrels per day (28,000(19,000 barrels Imperial’sImperial's share) compared to 2020, which was2022, as a result of improved reliability, plant capacity utilization, and mine equipment productivity.
In 2023, Kearl completed its multiyear program to convert its 81 haul trucks to autonomous operation. Imperial is now one of the asset’s previous annual production record. Increased production was primarily driven bylargest autonomous mine fleet operators in the absence of prior year production balancing with market demands, supported byworld and continues to capture productivity improvements while also reducing costs and further enhancing operational safety.
In 2023, the supplemental crushers and other reliability improvements. Kearl also eliminatedcompany successfully completed its fall turnaround and transitionedmultiyear program to a single annual turnaround, one year ahead of schedule.
Kearl successfully started up the first Kearlinstall six Boiler Flue Gas heat recovery unit in 2021.units. This technology recovers waste heat from a boiler’s combustion exhaust to
pre-heat
preheat process water. This not only has the potential towater and reduce operating costs, but also emissions by up to 30,000 tonnes / year of carbon dioxide equivalent. Imperial is currently progressing plans to apply this innovative technology on up to five additional boilers.greenhouse gas emissions.
Cold Lake
Cold Lake is an
in-situ
heavy oil bitumen operation. The product, a blend of bitumen and diluent, is typically shipped to the company’s refineries, Exxon Mobil Corporation refineries and to other third parties.
During 2021,In 2023, net bitumen production at Cold Lake was about 114,000106,000 barrels per day andday. The gross production was about 140,000135,000 barrels per day. Gross production increasedday, which is a decrease of about 8,0009,000 barrels per day compared to 2020 as a result2022.
Cold Lake continues to utilize its commercial application of improved reliability,Liquid Addition to Steam for Enhanced Recovery (LASER), with the technology now being applied to approximately 15 percent of production, optimizations,resulting in reduced greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS) technology.
Grand Rapids Phase 1 (GRP1) will be the first SA-SAGD project in the industry and recent capital-efficient infill drilling.
is expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions intensity by up to 40 percent compared to existing CSS technology. The initial steam injection phase started in December 2023 and is expected to last until the end of the first quarter of 2024, with production ramping up over the following months.
Syncrude
Syncrude is a joint venture established to recover shallow deposits of oil sands using
open-pit
mining methods to extract crude bitumen, and then upgrade it to produce a high-quality, light (32 degrees API), sweet, synthetic crude oil. The company holds a 25 percent participating interest in the joint venture. The produced synthetic crude oil is typically shipped to the company’s refineries, Exxon Mobil Corporation refineries and to other third parties.
In 2021,2023, the company’s share of Syncrude’s net production of synthetic crude oilproduction was about 62,00067,000 barrels per day andday. The gross production was about 71,00076,000 barrels per day.
On September 30, 2021, operatorship successfully transferred from Syncrude Canadaday, which is a decrease of about 1,000 barrels per day compared to Suncor. With the transition complete, additional synergies are expected to be captured, in an effort to maximize profitability and improve reliability.2022.
The Province of Alberta, in its capacity as lessor of Kearl, Cold Lake, and Syncrude oil sands leases, is entitled to a royalty on production. Royalties are subject to the oil sands royalty regulations which are based upon a sliding scale determined largely by the price of crude oil.
Delivery commitments
The company has no material commitments to provide a fixed and determinable quantity of oil or gas under existing contracts and agreements.
13

Table of Contents
Oil and gas properties, wells, operations and acreage
Production wells
The company’s production of liquids, bitumen and natural gas is derived from wells located exclusively in Canada. The total number of wells capable of production, in which the company had interests at December 31, 20212023 and December 31, 2020,2022, is set forthdisclosed in the following table. The statistics in the table are determined in part from information received from other operators.
The total number of wells decreased in 2023 primarily due to the shut-in of multiple non-economical wells.
  
 
Year ended December 31, 2021
 
   Year ended December 31, 2020 
   Crude oil   Natural gas   Crude oil   Natural gas 
wells
   Gross 
(a
   Net 
(b
   Gross 
(a
   Net 
(b
   Gross 
(a
   Net 
(b
   Gross 
(a
   Net 
(b)
 
Total
(c)
  
 
4,557
 
  
 
4,509
 
  
 
2,729
 
  
 
885
 
   4,660    4,610    2,767    898  
(a)
Gross wells are wells in which the company owns a working interest.
(b)
Net wells are the sum of the fractional working interest owned by the company in gross wells, rounded to the nearest whole number.
(c)
Multiple completion wells are permanently equipped to produce separately from two or more distinctly different geological formations. At
year-end
2021, the company had an interest in 12 gross wells with multiple completions (2020 - 12 gross wells).

Year ended December 31, 2023Year ended December 31, 2022
Crude oilNatural gasCrude oilNatural gas
wells
Gross (a)
Net (b)
Gross (a)
Net (b)
Gross (a)
Net (b)
Gross (a)
Net (b)
Total (c)
4,0844,0802,4117704,2774,2642,419774
(a)Gross wells are wells in which the company owns a working interest.
(b)Net wells are the sum of the fractional working interest owned by the company in gross wells, rounded to the nearest whole number.
(c)Multiple completion wells are permanently equipped to produce separately from two or more distinctly different geological formations. At year-end 2023, the company had an interest in 12 gross wells with multiple completions (2022 - 12 gross wells).
Land holdings
At December 31, 20212023 and December 31, 2020,2022, the company held the following oil and gas rights, and bitumen and synthetic crude oil leases, all of which are located in Canada, specifically in the western provinces, in the Canada lands and in the Atlantic offshore.

     Developed   Undeveloped   Total 
thousands of acres
    
 
2021
 
   2020   
 
2021
 
   2020   
 
2021
 
   2020 
Western provinces 
(a):
             
Liquids and gas
  
- gross
(b)
 
 
1,059
 
   1,043   
 
621
 
   697   
 
1,680
 
   1,740 
  
- net
(c)
 
 
517
 
   510   
 
350
 
   388   
 
867
 
   898 
Bitumen
  
- gross
(b)
 
 
196
 
   197   
 
584
 
   594   
 
780
 
   791 
  
- net
(c)
 
 
182
 
   182   
 
255
 
   265   
 
437
 
   447 
Synthetic oil
  
- gross
(b)
 
 
119
 
   119   
 
100
 
   100   
 
219
 
   219 
  
- net
(c)
 
 
30
 
   30   
 
25
 
   25   
 
55
 
   55 
Canada lands
(d)
:
             
Liquids and gas
  
- gross
(b)
 
 
2
 
   2   
 
1,803
 
   1,803   
 
1,805
 
   1,805 
  
- net
(c)
 
 
2
 
   2   
 
495
 
   495   
 
497
 
   497 
Atlantic offshore:
             
Liquids and gas
  
- gross
(b)
 
 
65
 
   65   
 
267
 
   267   
 
332
 
   332 
   
- net
(c)
 
 
6
 
   6   
 
36
 
   36   
 
42
 
   42 
Total
(e)
:
  
- gross
(b)
 
 
1,441
 
   1,426   
 
3,375
 
   3,461   
 
4,816
 
   4,887 
   
- net
(c)
 
 
737
 
   730   
 
1,161
 
   1,209   
 
1,898
 
   1,939 
(a)
Western provinces include British Columbia and Alberta.
(b)
Gross acres include the interests of others.
(c)
Net acres exclude the interests of others.
(d)
Canada lands include the Arctic Islands, Beaufort Sea / Mackenzie Delta, and other Northwest Territories.
(e)
Certain land holdings are subject to modification under agreements whereby others may earn interests in the company’s holdings by performing certain exploratory work
(farm-out)
and whereby the company may earn interests in others’ holdings by performing certain exploratory work
(farm-in).
        Developed      UndevelopedTotal
thousands of acres2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 
Western provinces (a):
Liquids and gas
- gross (b)
422 441 185 185 607 626 
- net (c)
253 260 135 135 388 395 
Bitumen
- gross (b)
196 196 584 584 780 780 
- net (c)
182 182 255 255 437 437 
Synthetic crude oil
- gross (b)
119 119 100 100 219 219 
- net (c)
30 30 25 25 55 55 
Canada lands (d):
Liquids and gas
- gross (b)
2 1,803 1,803 1,805 1,805 
- net (c)
2 496 495 498 497 
Atlantic offshore:
Liquids and gas
- gross (b)
65 65 146 146 211 211 
- net (c)
6 22 22 28 28 
Total (e):
- gross (b)
804 823 2,818 2,818 3,622 3,641 
- net (c)
473 480 933 932 1,406 1,412 
(a)Western provinces include British Columbia and Alberta.
(b)Gross acres include the interests of others.
(c)Net acres exclude the interests of others.
(d)Canada lands include the Arctic Islands, Beaufort Sea / Mackenzie Delta, and other Northwest Territories.
(e)Certain land holdings are subject to modification under agreements whereby others may earn interests in the company’s holdings by performing certain exploratory work (farm-out) and whereby the company may earn interests in others’ holdings by performing certain exploratory work (farm-in).



14


Western provinces
The company’s bitumen leases include about 161,000 net acres of oil sands leases near Cold Lake and an area of about 34,000 net acres at Kearl. The company also has about 68,000 net acres of undeveloped, mineable oil sands acreage in the Athabasca region. In addition, the company has interests in other bitumen oil sands leases in the Athabasca areas totalling about 173,000 net acres, which include about 62,000 net acres of oil sands leases in the Clyden area, about 34,000 net acres of oil sands leases in the Aspen area, about 30,000 net acres of oil sands leases in the Corner area, about 29,000 net acres in the Clarke Creek area and about 18,000 net acres in the Chard area. The 173,000 net acres are suitable for
in-situ
recovery techniques.
The company’s share of Syncrude joint venture leases covering about 55,000 net acres accounts for the entire synthetic crude oil acreage.
Oil sands leases have an exploration period of 15 years and are continued beyond that point by payment of escalating rentals or by production. The majority of the acreage in Cold Lake, Kearl and Syncrude is continued by production.
The company holds interests in an additional 867,000388,000 net acres of developed and undeveloped land in the western provinces related to crude oil and natural gas, including about 369,000 net acres associated with the company’s unconventional portfolio in Alberta. These interests include lands that are part of Imperial’s recent announcement to market its interest in XTO Energy Canada jointly with ExxonMobil Canada. XTO Energy Canada assets include 568,000 net acres in the Montney shale, 85,000 net acres in the Duvernay shale and additional acreage in other areas of Alberta; Imperial owns a 50 percent interest in XTO Energy Canada. This is consistent with Imperial’s strategy to focus its upstream resources and efforts on its key oil sands assets.gas.
Crude oil and natural gas leases and licences from the western provinces have exploration periods ranging from two2 to 15 years and are continued beyond that point by proven production capability.
Canada lands
Land holdings in Canada lands primarily include exploration licence (EL) acreage in the Beaufort Sea of about 252,000 net acres and significant discovery licence (SDL) acreage in the Mackenzie Delta and Beaufort Sea areas of about 183,000 net acres.
Exploration licences on Canada lands have a finite term. If a significant discovery is made, a SDL may be granted that holds the acreage under the SDL indefinitely, subject to certain conditions.
The company’s net acreage in Canada lands is either continued by production or held through ELs and SDLs.
Atlantic offshore
Exploration licences on Atlantic offshore have a finite term. The Atlantic offshore acreage is continued by production licences or held by SDLs.

15

Table of Contents
Downstream
Supply and trading
The company supplements its own production of crude oil, condensate and petroleum products with substantial purchases from a number of other sources at negotiated market prices, in addition to undertaking trading activities. Purchases and sales are made under both spot and term contracts from domestic and foreign sources, including ExxonMobil.
Transportation
ImperialThe company currently transports the company’sits crude oil production and third-party crude oil required to supply refineries by contracted pipelines, common carrier pipelines and rail. ToThe company has rail infrastructure to mitigate pipeline capacity constraints, the company has developed rail infrastructure. The Edmonton rail terminal has total capacity to ship up to 210,000 barrels per day of crude oil.
constraints.
Refining
The company owns and operates three refineries, which process predominantly Canadian crude oil. The company purchases finished products to supplement its refinery production.
The approximate average daily volumes of refinery throughput and utilization during the three years ended December 31, 2021,2023, and the daily rated capacities of the refineries as at December 31, 2021,2023, were as follows.
 
           Refinery throughput (a)
Rated capacities (b)
            Year ended December 31at December 31
thousands of barrels per day2023 2022 2021 2023 
Strathcona, Alberta186 195 172 197 
Sarnia, Ontario110 113 106 123 
Nanticoke, Ontario111 110 101 113 
Total407 418 379 433 
Utilization of refinery capacity (percent)
94 98 89 
(a)Refinery throughput is the volume of crude oil and feedstocks that is processed in the refinery atmospheric distillation units.
(b)Refining capacity data is based on 100 percent of rated refinery process unit stream-day capacities to process inputs to atmospheric distillation units under normal operating conditions, less the impact of shutdowns for regular repair and maintenance activities, averaged over an extended period of time.


2023
   Refinery throughput 
(a)
     Rated capacities 
(b)
 
   Year ended December 31     at December 31 
thousands of barrels per day
  
 
2021
 
     2020      2019     
 
2021
 
Strathcona, Alberta
  
 
172
 
     170      183     
 
196
 
Sarnia, Ontario
  
 
106
 
     86      86     
 
119
 
Nanticoke, Ontario
  
 
101
 
     84      84     
 
113
 
Total
  
 
379
 
     340      353     
 
428
 
Utilization of refinery capacity
(percent)
  
 
89
 
     80      83        
(a)
Refinery throughput is the volume of crude oil and feedstocks that is processed in the refinery atmospheric distillation units.
(b)
Rated capacities are based on definite specifications as to types of crude oil and feedstocks that are processed in the refinery atmospheric distillation units, the products to be obtained and the refinery process, adjusted to include an estimated allowance for normal maintenance shutdowns. Accordingly, actual capacities may be higher or lower than rated capacities due to changes in refinery operation and the type of crude oil available for processing.
Lower refinery throughput in 2023 primarily reflects the impact of planned turnaround activities at Strathcona and Sarnia refineries.
2021
2022
Improved refinery throughput in 20212022 was primarily reflects reduced impacts associated with the
COVID-19
pandemic, partially offset by a planned turnaround at Strathcona.
2020
Lower throughput was driven by increased demand and reduced demand due to the
COVID-19
pandemic, partially offset by lower refinery turnaround activity and reliability events, including impacts from the Sarnia fractionation tower incident which occurred in April 2019.activity.
Distribution
The company maintains a nationwide distribution system to move petroleum products to market by pipeline, tanker, rail and road transport. The company owns and operates fuel terminals across the country, as well as natural gas liquids and products pipelines in Alberta, Manitoba and Ontario and has interests in the capital stock of two products pipeline companies.

16

Table of Contents
Marketing
The company markets petroleum products throughout Canada under well-known brand names, most notably Esso and Mobil, to all types of customers.
ImperialThe company supplies petroleum products to the motoring public through Esso and Mobil-branded sites and independent marketers. At the end of 2021,2023, there were about 2,4002,500 sites operating under a branded wholesaler model, whereby Imperial supplies fuel to independent third parties who own and operate sites in alignment with Esso and Mobil brand standards.
standards, whereby the company supplies fuel to independent third parties.
ImperialThe company also sells petroleum products, including fuel, asphalt and lubricants, to large industrial and transportation customers, independent marketers, resellers, as well as other refiners. The company serves agriculture, residential heating and commercial markets through branded fuel and lubricant resellers.
The approximate daily volumes of net petroleum products (excluding purchases / sales contracts with the same counterparty) sold during the three years ended December 31, 2021,2023, are set out in the following table.

thousands of barrels per day
  
 
2021
 
     2020      2019 
Gasolines
  
 
224
 
     215      249 
Heating, diesel and jet fuels
  
 
160
 
     146      167 
Lube oils and other products
Heavy fuel oils
  
 
27
 
     20      21 
Lube oils and other products
  
 
45
 
     40      38 
Net petroleum product sales
  
 
456
 
     421      475 
In 2021,2023, lower petroleum product sales were primarily driven by lower wholesale customer volume.
In 2022, improved petroleum product sales primarily reflects reduced impacts associated with the
COVID-19
pandemic.increased demand.
In 2020, lower sales were primarily driven by reduced demand due to the
COVID-19
pandemic.
Chemical
The company’s Chemical operations manufacture and market benzene, aromatic and aliphatic solvents, plasticizer intermediates, polyethylene resin, and polyethylene resin.markets refinery grade propylene. Its petrochemical and polyethylene manufacturing operations are located in Sarnia, Ontario, adjacent to the company’s petroleum refinery.
The company’s total petrochemical sales volumes during the three years ended December 31, 2021,2023, were as follows.

thousands of tonnes2023 2022 2021 
Total petrochemical sales820 842 831 
thousands of tonnes
  
 
2021
 
     2020      2019 
Total petrochemical sales
  
 
831
 
     749      732 
In 2021,2023, sales volumes decreased primarily due to planned maintenance activities.
In 2022, sales volumes increased primarily due to higher sales of intermediatespropylene and aromatics.polyethylene, partially offset by lower intermediates.

In 2020, sales volumes increased primarily due to higher sales of intermediates.
17


Human capital resources
Imperial operates in a complex, competitive and changing business environment where decisions and risks play out over time horizons that are often decades in length. This long-term orientation underpins the company’s philosophy on talent development.
Talent development begins with recruiting exceptional candidates and continues with individually planned experiences and training designed to facilitate broad development and a deep understanding of ourthe company's business across the business cycle. The company’s compensation is market competitive, long-term oriented, and highly differentiated by individual performance. In addition, benefits and workplace programs support the company’s talent management approach, and are designed to attract and retain employees for a long-term career. Overall, this multifaceted approach has resulted in strong employee retention.
Imperial views diversity as an opportunity. The company encourages and respects diversity of thought, ideas, and perspective in its workforce. The company considers diversity through all stages of employment including recruitment, training and development of its employees. Imperial’sThe company’s goal is to reflect the mix and diversity of the communities where it operates, and it continues to focus on diverse representation at all levels of the organization.
The number of regular employees was about 5,4005,300 at the end of 2023 (2022 - 5,300, 2021 (2020 - 5,800, 2019 - 6,000)5,400). Regular employees are defined as active executive, management, professional, technical, administrative, and wage employees who work full-time or part-time for the company and are covered by the company’s benefit plans and programs.
Competition
The Canadian energy and petrochemical industries are highly competitive. Competition exists in the search for and development of new sources of supply, the construction and operation of crude oil, natural gas and refined products pipelines and facilities and the refining, distribution and marketing of petroleum products and chemicals. The energy and petrochemical industries also compete with other industries in supplying the energy, fuel and chemical needs of both industrial and individual consumers. Certain industry participants, including Imperial, are expanding investments in lower-emission energy and emission-reduction services and technologies.
18

Table of Contents
Government regulations
Petroleum, natural gas and oil sands rights
Most of the company’s petroleum, natural gas and oil sands rights were acquired from governments, either federal or provincial. These rights, in the form of leases or licences, are generally acquired for cash or work commitments. A lease or licence entitles the holder to explore for petroleum, natural gas and / or oil sands on the leased lands for a specified period.
In western provinces, the lease holder can produce the petroleum or natural gas discovered on the leased lands and retains the rights based on continued production. Oil sands leases are retained by meeting the minimum level of evaluation, payment of rentals, or by production.
The holder of a licence relating to Canada lands and the Atlantic offshore can apply for a SDL if a discovery is made. If granted, the SDL holds the lands indefinitely subject to certain conditions. The holder may then apply for a production licence in order to produce petroleum or natural gas from the licenced land.
Project approval
Approvals and licences from relevant provincial or federal
governmental or regulatory bodies are required for the company to carry out, or make modifications to, its oil and gas activities. The project approval process for major projects can involve, among other things, environmental assessments (including relevant mitigation measures), stakeholder and Indigenous consultation and input regarding project concerns, and public hearings. Approval may be subject to various conditions and commitments arising through these processes.
In 2019,Approval of large energy projects may be impacted by the Canadian government implemented a new environmental assessment framework in Canada under the
Canada's Impact Assessment Act
(IAA), which may impact the manner in which large energy projects are approved.. The IAA includes broader consideration for social, health, and gender-based impacts, the impact on Canada’s climate change commitments (including a requirement under the Strategic Assessment for Climate Change to provide a credible plan for the project to deliver
net-zero
greenhouse gas emissions by 2050), reliance on strategic and regional assessments and adjusted regulatory review timelines. In October 2023, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the new federal assessment scheme was unconstitutional in part. Legislative and regulatory amendments have yet to be made to address this decision. The impact of this legislation and its expected amendments is not fully apparent, but it may impact the cost, manner, duration and ability to advance large energy projects and project expansions.
Environmental protection
The company regards protecting the environment in connection with its various operations as a priority. The company is subject to extensive environmental regulations in Canada that apply to all phases of exploration, development, operation, and final closure. These requirements cover the management and monitoring of potential environmental impacts during active operations, including practices for land disturbance, wildlife protection, specifications for equipment operation and material storage and limitations on discharges to the environment. It also includes conducting environmental surveys and collecting continuous operational measurements and sampling to confirm that environmental practices are adequately protecting the environment. These regulations also specify the actions and requirements for final reclamation, abandonment and closure of facilities. The company works in cooperation with government agencies, industry associations and communities to address existing, and to anticipate potential, environmental protection issues. The company also maintains extensive operating procedures, processes and emergency response plans to address environmental risks at its operations.
As discussed in Item"Item 1A. “RiskRisk factors” in this report, compliance with existing and potential future government regulations, including environmental regulations, may have material effects on the capital expenditures, earnings, and competitive position of the company. Imperial takes new and ongoing measures throughout its operations each year to prevent and minimize the impact of its operations on air, land and water. These include significant investments in refining infrastructure and technology to manufacture clean fuels, continued evaluation and implementation of new technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, adherence to federal and provincial greenhouse gas emissions reduction and reporting programs, enhanced water and land management, and expenditures for asset retirement obligations. In the past five years, the company has made capital and operating expenditures of about $3.7$5.6 billion on environmental protection and facilities. In 2021,2023, the company’s environmental capital and operating expenditures totalled approximately $1.1$1.7 billion, which was spent primarily on activities to protect the air, land and water, including remediation projects. Capital and operatingEnvironmental expenditures relating to environmental protection are expected to be about $1.0increase to approximately $1.9 billion in 2022.
2024, with capital expenditures expected
19


Tableto account for approximately 52 percent of Contentsthe total. Costs for 2025 are anticipated to be approximately $1.5 billion, with capital expenditures expected to account for approximately 43 percent of the total.

Crude oil
Production
Production
The maximum allowable gross production of crude oil from wells in Canada is subject to limitations by various regulatory authorities on the basis of engineering and conservation principles.
Additionally, the Government of Alberta has in the past used temporary mandatory production curtailment regulations to impose production limits on large producers in Alberta. Mandatory production curtailments wereAlberta, such as those implemented in January 2019 and eliminatedrepealed in December 2020. By the end of 2021, the regulatory authority to impose curtailments was repealed.2021.
Exports
Export contracts of more than one year for light crude oil and petroleum products and two years for heavy crude oil (including bitumen) require the prior approval of the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) and the Government of Canada. Export contracts of less than one year for light crude oil and petroleum products and two years for heavy crude oil (including bitumen) require an order from the CER.
Natural gas
Production
The maximum allowable gross production of natural gas from wells in Canada is subject to limitations by various regulatory authorities. These limitations are to ensure oil recovery is not adversely impacted by accelerated gas production practices. These limitations do not impact gas reserves, only the timing of production of the reserves and did not have a significant impact on Imperial’s 20212023 gas production rates.
Exports
Exports
The Government of Canada has the authority to regulate the export price for natural gas. Exports of natural gas from Canada require approval by the CER and the Government of Canada. The Government of Canada allows the export of natural gas by CER order without volume limitation for terms not exceeding 24 months.
Royalties
The Government of Canada and the provinces in which the company produces crude oil and natural gas impose royalties on production from lands where they own the mineral rights. Some producing provinces also receive revenue by imposing taxes on production from lands where they do not own the mineral rights.
Different royalties are imposed by the Government of Canada and each of the producing provinces. Royalties imposed on crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids vary depending on a number of parameters, including well production volumes, selling prices and recovery methods. For information with respect to royalties for Kearl, Cold Lake and Syncrude, see “Upstream”"Upstream" section entitled “Present activities”"Present activities" under Item 1 on page 13.
1.
20


Investment Canada Act
The
Investment Canada Act
requires Government of Canada approval, in certain cases, of the acquisition of control of a Canadian business by an entity that is not controlled by Canadians. The acquisition of natural resource properties may, in certain circumstances, be considered a transaction that constitutes an acquisition of control of a Canadian business requiring Government of Canada approval.
The Act also requires notification of the establishment of new unrelated businesses in Canada by entities not controlled by Canadians, but does not require Government of Canada approval except when the new business is related to Canada’s cultural heritage or national identity. The Government of Canada is also authorized to take any measures that it considers advisable to protect national security, including the outright prohibition of a foreign investment in Canada.
By virtue of the majority stock ownership of the company by ExxonMobil, the company is considered to be an entity which is not controlled by Canadians.
20

Competition Act
The Competition Bureau seeks to ensure that Canadian businesses and consumers prosper in a competitive and innovative marketplace. The Competition Bureau is responsible for the administration and enforcement of the
Competition Act
(the
(the Act). A merger transaction, whether or not notifiable, is subject to examination by the Commissioner of the Competition Bureau to determine whether the merger will have, or is likely to have, the effect of preventing or lessening substantially competition in a definable market. The assessment of the competitive effects of a merger is made with reference to the factors identified under the Act.
An Advance Ruling Certificate (ARC) may be issued by the Commissioner to a party or parties to a proposed merger transaction who want to be assured that the transaction will not give rise to proceedings under section 92 of the Act. An ARC may be issued when the Commissioner is satisfied that there would not be sufficient grounds on which to apply to the Competition Tribunal for an order against a proposed merger. The issuance of an ARC is discretionary. An ARC cannot be issued for a transaction that has been completed, nor does an ARC ensure approval of the transaction by any agency other than the Competition Bureau.
The company online
The company’s website
www.imperialoil.ca
contains a variety of corporate and investor information free of charge, including the company’s annual report on Form
10-K,
quarterly reports on Form
10-Q
and current reports on Form
8-K
and amendments to these reports. These reports are made available as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed or furnished to the SEC. The SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, contains reports, proxy and information statements, interactive data files, and other information regarding issuers that are submitted and posted electronically with the SEC.

21

Item 1A.
Item 1A.     Risk factors
Imperial’s financial and operating results are subject to a variety of risks inherent in oil, gas and petrochemical businesses, and the pursuit of lower-emission business opportunities. Many of these risk factors are not within Imperial’s control and could adversely affect Imperial’s business, financial and operating results, or financial position. These risk factors include:
Supply and demand
The oil, gas, fuels and petrochemical businesses are fundamentally commodity businesses. This means the company’s operations and earnings may be significantly affected by changes in oil, natural gas and petrochemical prices, and by changes in margins on refined products and petrochemicals. Crude oil, natural gas, petrochemical and petroleum product prices and margins depend on local, regional, and global events or conditions that affect supply and demand for the relevant commodity or product. Commodity prices have been volatile, and the company expects that volatility to continue. Any material decline in crude oil prices could have a material adverse effect on Imperial’sthe company’s Upstream operations, financial position, proved reserves and the amount spent to develop reserves. On the other hand, a material increase in crude oil prices could have a material adverse effect on Imperial’sthe company's Downstream margins, depending on the market conditions for refined products.
The company's pursuit of lower-emission business opportunities including carbon capture and storage, hydrogen, and lower-emission fuels also depends on the growth and development of markets for those products and services, including implementation of supportive government policies and developments in technology to enable those products and services to be provided on a cost-effective basis at commercial scale. See "Climate change, energy transition and greenhouse gas restrictions" in this Item 1A. The company may also be impacted by changes in other commodities the company utilizes, such as prices and availability of feedstocks for lower-emission fuels including renewable diesel.
Economic conditions
The demand for energy and petrochemicals is generally linked closely with broad-based economic activities and levels of prosperity. The occurrence of recessions or other periods of low or negative economic growth will typically have a direct adverse impact on the company’s results. Other factors that affect general economic conditions such as changes in population growth rates, government regulation or austerity programs, trade tariffs or broader breakdowns in global trade, security or public health issues and responses, the inability to access debt markets due to rating, banking, or legal constraints, liquidity crises, other events or conditions that impair the functioning of financial markets and institutions also pose risks to the company.
Other demand-related factors
Factors that may affect the demand for crude oil, gas, fuels and petrochemicals, and therefore could impact Imperial’sthe company’s results include technological improvements in energy efficiency; seasonal weather patterns, which affect the demand for ourthe company's products, including lower demand for gasoline, impacting Downstream results in the winter; increased competitiveness of, or government policy support for, alternative energy sources; new product quality regulations; technological changes or consumer preferences that alter fuel choices, such as technological advances in energy storage or other critical areas that make wind, and solar, hydrogen, nuclear or other alternatives more competitive for power generation; changes in consumer preferences for the company’s products, including consumer demand for alternative fueled or electric transportation or alternatives to plastic products; broad-based changes in personal income levels, interest rates and inflation; and security or public health issues and responses such as epidemics and pandemics. Market factors may also result in losses from commodity derivatives and other instruments used to hedge price exposures or for trading purposes. See also “Climate"Climate change, energy transition and greenhouse gas restrictions”restrictions" below.















22

Other supply-related factors
Commodity prices and margins also vary depending on a number of factors affecting supply. For example, increased supply from the development of new oil and gas supply sources and technologies to enhance recovery from existing sources tends to reduce commodity prices to the extent such supply increases are not offset by commensurate growth in demand. Similarly, increases in industry refining or petrochemical manufacturing capacity relative to demand tend to reduce margins on affected products. Crude oil, gas and petrochemical supply levels can also be affected by factors that reduce available supplies, such as the level of and adherence by participating countries or others to production quotas established by OPEC or “OPEC+”"OPEC+" and other agreements among sovereigns,sovereigns; government policies that restrict oil and gas production or exports, or increase associated costs, including actions intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and previous Government of Alberta curtailment regulations,regulations; the occurrence of wars or hostile actions, including disruption of land or sea transportation routes; natural disasters,disasters; trade tariffs or broader breakdowns in global trade,trade; disruptions in competitors’ operations, oroperations; and unexpected pipeline or rail constraints that may disrupt and have in the past disrupted supplies. For example, Russia's military action in Ukraine has impacted global crude oil and gas supply levels and prices, and continues to contribute to a volatile commodity environment, the duration of which is uncertain. Technological change can also alter the relative costs for competitors to find, produce, and refine oil and gas and to manufacture petrochemicals.
Canadian-specific market factors
22

The market price for western Canadian heavy crude oil is typically lower than light and medium grades of oil, principally due to the higher transportation and refining costs. Western Canadian crude oil may also be subject to limits on transportation capacity to markets. Future crude price differentials between western Canadian crude oil relative to prices in the U.S. Gulf Coast are uncertain and changes in the heavy or light crude oil differentials could have a material adverse effect on the company’s business. IncreasedIn the past, increased differentials in 2018 alsohave led the Government of Alberta to enact temporary mandatory production curtailment regulations in 2019. These regulations enabled the government to imposethat imposed production limits on large producers in Alberta such as Imperial. Mandatory production curtailment was eliminated in December 2020 andAlthough the regulatory authority to impose curtailments was repealed at the end of 2021; however,2021, the use of similar curtailment regulations in the future could have an adverse effect on the company’s business. A significant portion of the company’s production is bitumen, which is blended with diluent for transportation and marketability of heavy crude oil. Increases to diluent prices, relative to heavy crude oil prices, could also have an adverse effect on the company’s business.

Other market factors
Market factors may also result in losses from commodity derivatives and other instruments used to hedge price exposures or for trading purposes. Imperial’s future business results, including cash flows and financing needs, may also be affected by the occurrence, severity, pace and rate of recovery of future public health epidemics or pandemics, the responsive actions taken by governments and others, and the resulting effects on regional and global markets and economies. If the company’s mitigation and response efforts prove insufficient, then large outbreaks of epidemics, pandemics or other health crises at operating sites, particularly in remote locations and where work camps are utilized, could materially impact the company’s personnel and its operations, reducing productivity and increasing costs.
Government and political factors
Imperial’s results can be adversely impacted by political, legal or regulatory developments affecting operations and markets. Changes in government policy or regulations, changes in law or interpretation of settled law, challenges to legislative jurisdiction between different levels of government, third-party opposition to company or infrastructure projects, and duration of regulatory reviews could impact Imperial’sthe company’s existing operations and planned projects. This includes actions by policy-makers,policy makers, regulators or other actors to delay or deny necessary licences and permits, or restrict the availability of oil and gas leases or the operation of third-party infrastructure that the company relies on, such as pipelines to transport the company’s upstream production to market or that supply feedstock to the company’s refineries. Additionally, changes in environmental regulations, assessment processes or other laws (including but not limited to in respect of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions), regulatory interpretations that exclude or disfavour the company's products under government policies or programs intended to support new or developing markets or technologies or that are otherwise not technology-neutral, and increasing and expanding stakeholder consultation (includingwith stakeholders and Indigenous stakeholders),communities, may increase the cost of compliance or reduce or delay available business opportunities and adversely impact the company’s results.
Other government and political factors that could adversely affect the company’s financial results include increases in taxes or government royalty rates (including retroactive claims)claims or punitive taxes on oil, gas and petrochemical operations) and changes in trade policies and agreements. Changes in taxation policy, such as
23

the Government of Canada's proposed tax on repurchases of equity effective from January 1, 2024, could impact the company’s financial results and ability to return surplus cash to shareholders. Further, the adoption of regulations mandating efficiency standards, and the use of alternative fuels or uncompetitive fuel components could affect the company’s operations. Many governments are providing tax advantages and other subsidies to support alternative energy sources or are mandating the use of specific fuels or technologies. Governments are also introducing bans on certain technologies that could impact demand for products, such as the Government of Canada’s intentionregulations to bangradually reduce the saleproportion of permitted sales of new internal combustion engine cars and light trucks from 2026-2034 and ban such sales beginning in 2035. Governments and others are also promoting research into new technologies to reduce the cost and increase the scalability of alternative energy sources, and the success of these initiatives may decrease demand for the company’s products. Actions by policy makers, regulators or others may require changes in the company’s business or strategy that could result in reduced returns.
Governments may establish regulations with respect to the control of the company’s production, such as when increased price differentials in 2018 led the Government of Alberta to imposeAlberta's temporary mandatory production curtailment regulations that were in effect from 2019 through 2021, as discussed in the “Supply"Supply and demand”demand" section above. Government intervention in free markets may introduce unintended consequences such as market volatility and uncertainty, misallocation of resources, and erosion of investor confidence.
Environmental risks
All phases of the Upstream, Downstream and Chemical businesses are subject to environmental regulation pursuant to a variety of Canadian federal, provincial, territorial and municipal laws and regulations, as well as international conventions (collectively, “environmental legislation”"environmental legislation").
Environmental legislation imposes, among other things, restrictions, liabilities and obligations in connection with the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous substances and waste and in connection with spills, releases and emissions of various substances into the environment. As well, environmental regulations are imposed on the qualities and compositions of the products sold and imported, and include those aimed at reducing consumption or addressing environmental concerns with certain end products. Changes to these requirements could adversely affect the company’s results by impacting commodity prices, increasing costs and reducing revenues.
23

Environmental legislation also requires that wells, facility sites and other properties associated with the company’s operations be operated, maintained, monitored, abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities. This includes the requirement for specific approvals for many areas of interaction with the environment, such as land use, air quality, water use, biodiversity protection and waste, including mine tailings management. The failure to operate as anticipated and adhere to conditions, the delay or denial of approvals and changes to conditions or regulations could impact the company’s ability to operate its projects and facilities and adversely affect the company’s results.

Regulation of air, water and land
The implementation of, and compliance with, policies and regulations related to air, water and land, such as Alberta’s Lower Athabasca Regional Plan and Wetland Policy applicable to the company’s oil sands assets, could restrict development in current and future areas of operation. Of note, the first of two court cases brought against the government by Indigenous groups regarding the assessment of cumulative impacts and infringement on exercise of treaty rights in Alberta is scheduled to be heard in 2024. These cases may inform future government decisions and policies regarding land use planning and resource development, and could impact the requirements or willingness to grant regulatory licenses or approvals. The company also depends on water obtained under licences for withdrawal, storage, reuse and discharge in both its Upstream and Downstream businesses, including future projects and expansions. Water use may be limited by regulatory requirements, seasonal fluctuations, regional drought, competing demands, environmental sensitivities, increasingly stringent water management standards, and changes to conditions or availability of licences, which may restrict and adversely affect the company’s operations. Additionally, a number of air quality regulations and frameworks are being developed or have been implemented at the federal and provincial levels, including sulphur dioxide limits for refineries in Ontario, and when implemented could impact existing and planned operations and projects through increased capital and operating expenses including retrofits to existing equipment, and could adversely impact the company’s operations and financial results.

24

Regulation of wildlife
Federal and provincial legislation aimed at protecting sensitive, threatened or endangered wildlife, such as woodland caribou and species of migratory birds, may also increase restoration and offset costs and impact the company’s projects. If it is determined that such wildlife and their habitat are not sufficiently protected, governments or other parties may take actions to limit the pace or ability to develop in areas of Imperial’s current and future projects.
Regulation of oil sands
The company’s mining operations are subject to tailings management regulations that establish approval, monitoring, reporting and performance criteria for tailings ponds and management plans. A failure or perceived failure to satisfy the requirements or if the company’s tailings management operations do not operate in the manner anticipated by the company or third parties such as the events relating to the environmental protection order at the company’s Kearl operations in 2023 could impact the company's ability to operate its assets, and such impact could be material. Further, the absence or evolving nature of policies and regulations for the timing and closure of tailings ponds, including the approved technologies and methods for closure (such as the use of end pit lakes and water capped tailings), and dam safety directives, regulations, guides and abandonment requirements could have a material impact on conditions for approvals and ultimate mine closure costs. Additionally, successful management and closure requires the release of water to the environment, and although an Alberta water release policy and federal oil sands effluent regulations are being developed, the timing and impact of these regulations is uncertain and the absence of effective regulation could negatively impact the company’s operations and financial results.
Environmental assessments
In addition, certain types of operations, including exploration and development projects and significant changes to certain existing projects, may require the submission and approval of environmental impact assessments. In 2019, theThe Government of Canada implemented a newCanada's environmental assessment framework under the
Impact Assessment Act
, which
expands assessment considerations beyond the environment to include social, health, economic, and gender-based impacts and the impact on Canada’s climate change commitments (including a requirement under the Strategic Assessment for Climate Change to provide a credible plan for the project to deliver
net-zero
greenhouse gas emissions by 2050). It also includes a reliance on strategic and regional assessments and adjusted regulatory review timelines. In October 2023, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the new federal assessment scheme was unconstitutional in part. Legislative and regulatory amendments have yet to be made to address this decision. The impact of this legislation and its expected amendments is not fully apparent, but it may impact the cost, manner, duration and ability to advance large energy projects.projects and project expansions.
Compliance costs
Compliance with environmental legislation can require significant expenditures and failure to comply with environmental legislation may result in the cessation of operations, imposition of fines and penalties, and liability for
clean-up
costs and damages.
24

The costs of complying with environmental legislation in the future could have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition or results of operations. The company anticipates that changes in environmental legislation may require, among other things, reductions in emissions from its operations to the air and water and may result in increased capital expenditures. Changes in environmental legislation (including, but not limited to, application of regulations related to air, water, land, biodiversity and waste, such as mine tailings and the production or use of new or recycled plastics) may increase the cost of operation or compliance or reduce or delay available business opportunities. Future changes in environmental legislation and the enforcement of regulations could occur and result in stricter standards and enforcement, larger fines, penalties and liability, and increased capital expenditures and operating costs, which could have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition or results of operations.
Risk Management
There are operational risks inherent in oil and gas exploration and production activities, as well as the potential to incur substantial financial liabilities, if the company does not manage those risks effectively. Environmental hazards and risks, including severe weather, drought, forest fires and geological events, may impact the company’s operational performance, such asperformance. For example, the company's oil sands operations were particularly affected by extreme cold weather that makes mining operations more difficult.in 2022 and wildfires in 2016. The ability to insure risks is limited by the capacity of the applicable insurance markets, which may not be sufficient to cover the likely cost of a major adverse operating event. Accordingly, the company’s primary focus is on prevention, including through its rigorous operations integrity management system. The company’s future results will depend on the continued effectiveness of these efforts.
25

Climate change, energy transition and greenhouse gas restrictions
Net-zero scenarios
Net zero scenarios
Driven by concern over the risks of climate change, the provinces and the Government of Canada have adopted or have revised regulatory frameworks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions including emissions from the production and use of oil and gas and their products.products as well as the use or support for different emission-reduction technologies. These actions are being taken both independently by national and regional governments and within the framework of United Nations Conference of the Parties’ summits under which Canada has endorsed objectives to reduce the atmospheric concentration of CO2carbon dioxide (CO2) over the coming decades, with an ambition ultimately to achieve “net zero.”"net zero". Net zero means that emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities would be balanced by actions that remove such gases from the atmosphere. Expectations for transition of the world’s energy system to lower emissionlower-emission sources, and ultimately net zero, derive from hypothetical scenarios that reflect many assumptions about the future and reflect substantial uncertainties. The company’s actions with respect to the energy transition, including its announced ambition,goal, ultimately, to achieve net zero with respect tocompany-wide net-zero emissions (Scope 1 and 2) from its upstream oil sands operations,operated assets with continued technology development and policy support, carries risks that the transition, including underlying technologies, policies, and markets as discussed in more detail below, will not be available or develop at the pace or in the manner expectedestimated by current
net-zero scenarios. The success of Imperial's strategy for the energy transition will also depend on its ability to recognize key signposts of changes in the global energy system on a timely basis, and the corresponding ability to direct investment to the technologies and businesses, at the appropriate stage of development, to best capitalize on the company's competitive strengths. Imperial’s results may be impacted if the implementation pace and uncertainty of policy reduces the global competitiveness of the Canadian oil and gas industry and the company’s crude oil and refined products.
scenarios.
Greenhouse gas restrictions
Government actions intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions include adoption of carbon emissions pricing, cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, emissions limits, increased mileage and other efficiency standards, low carbon fuels standards, mandates for sales of electrical vehicles and incentives or mandates for renewable energy. The Government of Canada has updated its nationally determined contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement on climate change, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions economy-wide by 40 to 45 percent below 2005 levels by 2030, a substantial increase in ambition beyond its original NDC. To implement these goals, the Government of Canada uses a number of policy tools including the
Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act
(GGPPA), which sets a federal backstop carbon price Canada-wide through a carbon levy applied to fossil fuels ($50 per tonne CO2CO2 equivalent emissions starting in 2022 and increasing by $15 per tonne annually to $170 per tonne in 2030), and an output-based pricing system for large industrial emitters. Under the GGPPA, provinces are required to either adopt the GGPPA, or obtain equivalency by adopting a price-based system (with a minimum of the federal carbon pricing) or a cap and trade system. Further, in 2021 the Government of Canada enacted legislation to formalize Canada’s target to achieve
net-zero
emissions by 2050 and establish interim emissions reductions targets at five year intervals. For 2022, underUnder the Canadian
Net-Zero
Emissions Accountability Act, the Government of Canada is required to develop an emissions reduction plan for 2030 consistent with achieving
net-zero
emissions by 2050.

25

The Government of Alberta has obtained federal equivalency for its Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction Regulation (TIER) that came into effect in 2020 and applies to facilities with CO2CO2 emissions in excess of 100,000 tonnes per year. TIER is designed to reduce emissions by putting a price on nominally 10 percent of a facility’s emissions in 2020,2020. This percentage of priced emissions increased nominally to 11 percent in 2021 and 12 percent in 2022, with the oil sands mining and upgrading facilities increasing to 17 percent in 2021 and 18 percent in 2022. These percentages increase by 12 percent per year.year for 2023 to 2028 (inclusive), followed by an increase of 4 percent in 2029 and 2030 for the oil sands sector. Further, the Alberta
Oil Sands Emissions Limit Act
sets a limit of 100 megatonnes of CO2CO
2 per year of emissions in the oil sands sector, but oil sands emissions remain below the limit and it is not yet possible to predict the impact of this act on the company’s future oil sands operations in Alberta. With respect to other provinces, with Ontario cancelling the cap and trade program in 2018, the company’s operations in Ontario were subject to theobtained federal carbon levy and output based pricing system through 2021. Starting in 2022, Ontario has received equivalency for its Emissions Performance System, which putsput a price on 8 percent of a facility’s emissions.emissions in 2022. The price increased by 2.4 percent in 2023 and will increase by 1.5 percent per year starting in 2024. British Columbia has carbon pricing in place for all industrial emissions, with pricing expected to align withthat matches the federal carbon pricing inschedule since 2022. Increases in carbon pricing could adversely impact the company’s operations and financial results unless the company can adapt its operations.operations through technological innovation and investment in a cost-effective manner or meet compliance through offset credits or other mechanisms.
There are also various low carbon fuel standards being developed or already applicable to the company’s products. TheIn 2022, the Government of Canada is finalizing draft regulations forfinalized the Clean Fuel Regulations, which will require the reduction
26

in carbon intensity of liquid transportation fuels supplied in Canada starting in December 2022.July 2023. The regulations build upon the existing federal renewable fuels regulations that require fuel producers and importerssuppliers to have a specified amountreduce the carbon intensity of renewable fuel in gasoline and diesel.diesel by reducing the GHG emissions within the fossil fuel life cycle, blending in low carbon intensity renewables or fuel switching away from fossil fuels. Similarly, British Columbia introduced a Low Carbon Fuel Standard in 2013, which increased to a 10 percent carbon intensity reduction requirement in 2020. TheBeginning in 2023, the British Columbia government has announced its intention to reducefurther increased the carbon intensity reductions to a total of fuels by a further 2030 percent by 2030.2030 (compared to the 2010 baseline). Compliance can be achieved by either blending renewable fuels with low carbon intensity or by purchasing credits.
In 2019, theThe Government of Canada enacted the
Canada's Impact Assessment Act
, which
links environmental assessment approvals to climate change-related goals, and has also discussed a goal of establishing legally-binding policies for being carbon-neutral by 2050. Changes and policies related to this act could adversely impact the company’s ability to progress new oil sands projects. Uncertainty exists regarding federal overreach into provincial jurisdiction to implement such changes and policies. In October 2023, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the Impact Assessment Act was unconstitutional in part. Legislative and regulatory amendments have yet to be made to address this decision, and the impact of this legislation and its expected amendments is not fully apparent.
International accords and underlying regional and national regulations covering climate change and greenhouse gas emissions continue to evolve with uncertain timing and outcome, making it difficult to predict their business impact. Such laws and policies could make Imperial’s products more expensive and less competitive, reduce or delay available business opportunities, reduce demand for hydrocarbons, and shift hydrocarbon demand toward lower greenhouse gas emission energy sources. Current and pending greenhouse gas regulations or policies may also increase compliance and abatement costs including taxes and levies, increase abandonment and reclamation obligations and impact decommissioning timelines, lengthen project evaluation and implementation times, impact reserves evaluations and affect operations. Increased costs may not be recoverable in the market place, could negatively affect ourthe company's returns and could reduce the global competitiveness of the company’s crude oil, natural gas and refined products. Governments may also impose restrictions on production of, or emissions from, oil and gas to the extent they view such measures as a viable approach for pursuing national and global energy and climate policies. For example, in December 2023, the Government of Canada announced its intentionpublished a regulatory framework to pursue a cap on greenhouse gas emissionemissions from upstream oil and gas activities by 2030. Concern over the risks of climate change may lead governments to make laws applicable to the energy industry progressively more stringent over time. Political and other actors and their agents are also increasingly seeking to advance climate change objectives indirectly, such as by seeking to reduce the availability or increase the cost of financing and investment in the oil and gas sectorsector. These actions include delaying or blocking needed infrastructure, utilizing shareholder governance mechanisms against companies or their shareholders or financial institutions in an effort to deter investments in oil and gas activities, and taking other actions intended to promote changes in business strategy for oil and gas companies.
Technology and lower-emission solutions
Technology
Achieving societal ambitions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and ultimately achieve net zeronet-zero will require new technologies to reduce the cost and increase the scalability of alternative energy sources as well as technologies such as carbon captureCarbon Capture and sequestrationStorage (CCS). CCS technologies, focused initially on capturing and sequestering CO2CO2 emissions from high-intensity industrial activities, can assist in meeting society’s objective to mitigate atmospheric greenhouse gas levels while also helping ensure the availability of the reliable and affordable energy the world requires. The company’s future results and ability to succeed through the energy transition while helping meet Canada's emission-reduction goals and meet its own net-zero and emission reduction goals will depend in part on the success of these research and collaboration efforts andefforts. It will also rely on the company’s ability to adapt and apply the strengths of its current business model to providing the energy products of the future in a cost-competitive manner.

26

Policy and market development
The scale of the world’s energy system means that, in addition to developments in technology discussed above, a successful energy transition will require appropriate support from governments and private participants throughout the global economy. The company’s ability to develop and deploy CCS and other lower emissionlower-emission energy technologies at commercial scale will depend in part on the continued development of supportive government policies and markets. Failure or delay of these policies or markets to materialize or be maintained could adversely impact these investments. Policy and other actions that result in restricting the availability of hydrocarbon products without commensurate reduction in demand may have unpredictable adverse effects, including increased commodity price volatility; periods of significantly higher commodity prices and resulting inflationary pressures; and local or regional energy shortages. Such effects in turn may depress economic
27

growth or lead to rapid or conflicting shifts in policy by different actors, with resulting adverse effects on the company’s business.

In addition, the existence of supportive policies in any jurisdiction is not a guarantee that those policies will continue in the future. The company's operations and planned projects that have been developed with regard to current or anticipated policies may become uneconomic or otherwise adversely impacted if such policies change or are not adopted as anticipated. See also the discussion of “Supply"Supply and demand”demand", “Government"Government and political factors”,factors" and “Management effectiveness”"Management effectiveness" in this Item 1A.
Currency
Prices for commodities produced by the company are commonly benchmarked in U.S. dollars. The majority of Imperial’s sales and purchases are related to these industry U.S. dollar benchmarks. As the company records and reports its financial results in Canadian dollars, to the extent that the value of the Canadian dollar strengthens, the company’s reported earnings will be negatively affected. The company does not currently make use of derivative instruments to offset exposures associated with foreign currency.
Other business risks
Imperial is reliant on a number of key chemicals, catalysts and third-party service providers, including input and output commodity transportation (pipelines, rail, trucking, marine) and utilities providing services, including electricity and water, to various company operations. The lack of availability, capacity or proximity, with respect to pipeline facilities and railcars, could negatively impact Imperial’sthe company’s ability to produce at capacity levels. Transportation disruptions, including those caused by events unrelated to the company’s operations, could adversely affect the company’s price realizations, refining operations and sales volumes. This includes outages of key third-party infrastructure, such as pipelines servicing the company’s oil sands assets or pipelines supplying feedstock to its refineries, which could impact the company’s ability to operate its assets or limit the ability to deliver production and products to market. A third-party utilities outage could have an adverse impact on the company’s operations and ability to produce.
The company also enters into contractual relationships with suppliers, partners and other counterparties to procure and sell goods and services, and the company’s operations, market position and financial condition may be adversely impacted if these counterparties do not fulfil their obligations. ImperialThe company may also be adversely affected by the outcome of litigation resulting from its operations or by government enforcement proceedings alleging
non-compliance
with applicable laws or regulations. Litigation is subject to uncertainty and success is not guaranteed, and the company may incur significant expenses and devote significant resources in defending litigation.
Management effectiveness
Current and future increases in operating costs such as energy, transportation and materials, including through shipping, supply chain disruptions and inflationary cost pressures, could adversely affect the company’s financial results if it is unable to control or offset these costs. In addition to direct potential impacts on the company's costs and revenues, market factors such as rates of inflation may indirectly impact results to the extent such factors reduce general rates of economic growth and therefore energy demand, as discussed under "Supply and demand". Further, as underlying inflationary pressures remained in Canada and other countries throughout 2023, governments maintained elevated interest rates which may further impact the company through the availability of financing, cost of debt, and exchange rate fluctuations. Additional information regarding the potential future impact of market factors on the company's businesses is included or incorporated by reference under Item 7A Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk in this report.
Operational and other factors
In addition to external economic and political factors, Imperial’s future business results also depend on the company’s ability to manage successfully those factors that are at least in part within its control.control, including its capital allocation into existing and new businesses. The extent to which Imperialthe company manages these factors will impact its performance relative to competition. For projects in which the company is not the operator such as Syncrude, Imperial depends on the management effectiveness of one or more co-venturers whom the company does not control.
27


Project management
The nature of the company’s Upstream, Downstream and Chemical businesses depend on complex, long-term, and capital intensive projects that require a high degree of project management expertise to maximize efficiency. This includes development, engineering, construction, commissioning and ongoing operational
28

activities and expertise. The company’s results are affected by its ability to develop and operate projects and facilities as planned, and by events or conditions that affect the advancement, operation, cost or results of such projects or facilities. These risks include the company’s ability to obtain the necessary environmental and other regulatory approvals; changes in regulations; the ability to negotiate successfully with joint venturers, partners, governments, suppliers, customers and others; the ability to model and optimize reservoir performance; changes in resources and operating costs including the availability and cost of materials, equipment and qualified personnel; the ability to qualify for certain incentives available under supportive government policies for emerging markets and technologies; the impact of general economic, business and market conditions; and the company’s ability to prevent, to the extent possible, and respond effectively to unforeseen technical difficulties that could delay project
start-up
or cause unscheduled downtime.
Operational efficiency
An important component of Imperial’s competitive performance, especially given the commodity basedcommodity-based nature of Imperial’sthe company’s business, is the ability to operate efficiently, including the company’s ability to manage expenses and improve production yields on an ongoing basis. This requires continuous management focus, including technological integration and improvements, cost control, productivity enhancements and regular reappraisal of the company’s asset portfolio. The company’s operations and results also depend on key personnel and subject matter expertise, the recruitment, development and retention of high caliber employees, and the availability of skilled labour.
Research and development and technical change
Imperial relies upon the research and development organizations of the company and ExxonMobil, with whom the company conducts shared research. Innovation and technology are important to maintain the company’s competitive position, especially in light of the technological nature of Imperial’s business and the need for continuous efficiency improvement.
The company’s research and development organizations must be able to adapt to a changing market and policy environment, including developing technologies to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions intensity. To remain competitive, the company must also continuously adapt and capture the benefits of new technologies including growing the company’s capabilities to utilize digital data technologies to gain new business insights. There are risks associated with projects that rely on new technology, including that the results of implementing the new technology may differ from simulated, piloted or expected results. The failure to develop and adopt new technology may have an adverse impact on the company’s operations, ability to meet regulatory requirements and operational commitments and targets (including environmental sustainability and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions), and financial results.
Safety, business controls and environmental risk management
The scope and nature of the company’s operations present a variety of significant hazards and risks, including operational hazards and risks such as explosions, fires, pipeline ruptures and crude oil spills. Imperial’s operations are also subject to the additional hazards of pollution, releases of toxic gas and environmental hazards and risks, suchincluding severe weather (such as severeextreme cold weather events that impacted the company's oil sands operations in early 2022), drought, forest fires and geological events. The company’s results depend on management’s ability to minimize these inherent risks, to effectively control business activities and to minimize the potential for human error. ImperialThe company applies rigorous management systems, including a combined program of effective operations integrity management, ongoing upgrades, key equipment replacements, and comprehensive inspection and surveillance. The company also maintains a disciplined framework of internal controls and applies a controls management system for monitoring compliance with this framework. The company’s upstream and downstream operations may experience loss of production, slowdowns or shutdowns and increased costs due to the failure of interdependent systems, and substantial liabilities and other adverse impacts could result if the company’s management systems and controls do not function as intended.
28

Cybersecurity
ImperialThe company is regularly subject to attempted cybersecurity disruptions from a variety of sources, including state-sponsored actors. Imperial’sThe company’s defensive preparedness includes multi-layered technological capabilities for prevention and detection of cybersecurity disruptions:
non-technological
measures such as threat information sharing with governmental and industry groups; annual internal training and awareness campaigns including routine testing of employee awareness via mock threats; and an emphasis on resiliency including business response and recovery. See "Item 1C. Cybersecurity" for information on the company's program for managing cybersecurity risks.

29

The company has limited ability to influence third parties, including the company's partners, suppliers, service providers (including providers of cloud-based services for the company's data or applications) and customers, to implement strong cybersecurity controls, and the company is exposed to potential harm from cybersecurity events that may affect their operations. During 2023, the company responded to several cyber-attacks on suppliers and joint venture partners, none of which caused a material impact to Imperial. The company’s response included giving technical assistance, loaning equipment, and taking additional defensive measures.
If the measures the company is taking to protect against cybersecurity disruptions prove to be insufficient or if the company’s proprietary data is otherwise not protected, the company, as well as its customers, employees or third parties, could be adversely affected. The company is exposed to potential harm from cybersecurity events that may affect the operations of third parties, including our partners, suppliers, service providers (including providers of cloud-based services for our data or applications), and customers. Cybersecurity disruptions could cause physical harm to people or the environment; damage or destroy assets; compromise business systems; result in proprietary information being altered, lost or stolen; result in employee, customer or third-party information being compromised; or otherwise disrupt the company’s business operations. ImperialThe company could incur significant costs to remedy the effects of a major cybersecurity disruption, in addition to costs in connection with resulting regulatory actions, litigation or reputational harm.
Preparedness
The company’s operations have been and in the future may be disrupted by severe weather events, natural disasters, human error, and similar events. The company's facilities are designed, engineered, constructed, and operated to withstand a variety of extreme climatic and other conditions, with safety factors built in to cover a number of uncertainties, including those associated with permafrost stability, temperature extremes, extreme rainfall events, earthquakes and other events. The company's consideration of changing weather conditions and inclusion of safety factors in design covers the engineering uncertainties that climate change and other events may potentially introduce. Imperial’s ability to mitigate the adverse impacts of these events depends in part upon the effectiveness of its robust facility engineering, rigorous disaster preparedness and response, planning, as well asand business continuity planning.
COVID-19
As a result of
COVID-19,
governments in many countries, including Canada, have mandated quarantines, closures,
stay-at-home
orders and travel restrictions that have had a significant impact on demand for the company’s products. While these effects are expected to be temporary, the resurgence of cases of
COVID-19
has led to a highly uncertain business environment. Although there has been some movement toward
pre-pandemic
activity levels, the duration of the business disruptions and related financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time and continued or new restrictions could continue to impact the demand for petroleum products.
Imperial’s future business results, including cash flows and financing needs, will be affected by the scope and severity of current and future COVID outbreaks; actions taken by governments and others to address the pandemic and the effects of those actions on national and global economies and markets; changes in consumer behavior that affect demand for our products; and the effectiveness of the company’s own responsive actions to protect the safety and well-being of its people.
The company has had positive
COVID-19
cases, but these cases have not had a material impact on its operations or business. The company has initiated numerous emergency response and business continuity plans, and a substantial portion of the company’s workforce has implemented remote working arrangements. However, if the company’s mitigation and response efforts prove insufficient, then large outbreaks of epidemics, pandemics or other health crises such as
COVID-19
at operating sites, particularly in remote locations and where work camps are utilized, could materially impact the company’s personnel and its operations, reducing productivity and increasing costs.
The company could also be impacted by disruption to supply chains, methods of distribution and key third-party service providers, which could impact the ability to produce or sell its products, as well as increase the costs associated with its operations and decrease revenues and margins.
The
COVID-19
pandemic continues to evolve, with changing case numbers and the potential for additional public health restrictions. The impact of the pandemic remains difficult to predict.
29

Reputation
Imperial’s reputation is an important corporate asset. Factors that could have an impact on the company’s reputation includinginclude an operating incident or significant cybersecurity disruption; changes in consumer views concerning the company’s products; a perception by the public that the company is not being fully transparent in the sharing of information regarding its operations that is or may be relevant to community decision-making; actions taken by the company's business partners; a perception by investors or others that insufficient progress is being made with respect to the company’s ambition in the energy transition, or that pursuit of this ambition may result in allocation of capital to investments with reduced returns; and other adverse events such as those described in this Item 1A. Negative impacts on Imperial’s reputation could, in turn, make it more difficult for the company to compete successfully for new opportunities, obtain necessary regulatory approvals, obtain financing, and attract talent, or they could reduce consumer demand for the company’s branded products. Imperial’s reputation may also be harmed by events which negatively affect the image of the industry as a whole, including public and investor perception of Alberta oil sands in relation to greenhouse gas emissions, Indigenous rights and environmental impact.
Reserves
The company’s future production and cash flows from bitumen, synthetic crude oil, liquids and natural gas reserves are highly dependent upon the company’s success in exploiting its current reserves. To maintain production and cash flows over the long term, the company must replace produced reserves, which can be accomplished through exploration discovery of new resources, appraisal and investments in developing discovered resources, or acquisition of reserves. To the extent cash flows from operations are insufficient to fund capital expenditures and external sources of capital become limited or unavailable, the company’s ability to make the necessary capital investments to maintain and grow oil and natural gas reserves will be adversely impacted. In addition, the company may be unable to find and develop or acquire additional reserves to replace oil and natural gas production at acceptable costs.

Estimates of economically recoverable oil and natural gas reserves and future net cash flows involve many uncertainties, including factors beyond the company’s control. Key factors with uncertainty include: geological and engineering estimates, including that additional information obtained through seismic and drilling programs, reservoir analysis and production and operational history may result in revisions to reserves; the assumed effects of regulation or changes to regulation by government agencies, including royalty frameworks and environmental regulations (such as the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, including accelerated timelines and emission reduction stringency to meet government goals, which could impose significant compliance costs on the company, require new technology, or impact the economic viability of certain projects); future commodity
30

prices, where low commodity prices may affect reserves development; abandonment and reclamation costs, including reclamation and tailings requirements for mining operations; and operating costs. Actual production, revenues, taxes and royalties, development costs, abandonment and reclamation costs, and operating expenditures, with respect to reserves, will likely vary from such estimates, and such variances could be material.

Item 1B.    Unresolved staff comments

None.

Item 1C.    Cybersecurity

Imperial recognizes the importance of cybersecurity in achieving its business objectives, safeguarding its assets, and managing its daily operations. Accordingly, the company integrates cybersecurity risks into its overall enterprise risk management system. The board of directors oversees the company’s risk management approach and structure, which includes an annual review of the company’s cybersecurity program.

The company’s cybersecurity program is managed by the Canada IT Manager, with support from cross-functional teams led by information technology (IT) and operational technology cybersecurity operations managers in the company and in Exxon Mobil Corporation and its affiliates (collectively, Cybersecurity Operations Managers). The Cybersecurity Operations Managers are responsible for the day-to-day management and effective functioning of the cybersecurity program, including the prevention, detection, investigation, and response to cybersecurity threats and incidents. The Cybersecurity Operations Managers collectively have many years of experience in cybersecurity operations.

IT management provides updates to the company’s senior management throughout the year, covering, as appropriate, the company’s cybersecurity strategy, initiatives, key security metrics, penetration testing and benchmarking learnings, and business response plans, as well as the evolving cybersecurity threat landscape.

The company’s cybersecurity program includes multi-layered technological capabilities designed to prevent and detect cybersecurity disruptions and leverages industry standard frameworks, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework. The cybersecurity program incorporates an incident response plan to engage cross-functionally and report cybersecurity incidents to appropriate levels of management based on potential impact. The company conducts annual cybersecurity awareness training and routinely tests cybersecurity awareness and business preparedness for response and recovery, which are developed based on real-world threats. In addition, IT management exchanges threat information with governmental and industry groups and proactively engages independent, third-party cybersecurity experts to test, evaluate and recommend improvements on the effectiveness and resiliency of its cybersecurity program through penetration testing, breach assessments, regular cybersecurity incident drill testing, threat information sharing, and industry benchmarking. The company takes a risk-based approach with respect to its third-party service providers, tailoring processes according to the nature and sensitivity of the data or systems accessed by such third-party service providers and performing additional risk screenings and procedures, as appropriate.

As of the date of this report, the company has not identified any risks from known cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any prior cybersecurity incidents, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the company including its business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition.

While the company believes its cybersecurity program to be appropriate for managing constantly evolving cybersecurity risks, no program can fully protect against all possible adverse events. For additional information on these risks and potential consequences if the measures the company is taking prove to be insufficient or if the company's proprietary data is otherwise not protected, see “Item 1A. Risk factors: Operational and other factors - Cybersecurity” in this report.

30
31

Item 1B.
Unresolved staff comments
None.
Item 2.
Item 2.    Properties

Reference is made to Item 1 above.

Item 3.
Item 3.     Legal proceedings
On October 8, 2021, Imperial was charged by the Ontario Crown in the Ontario Court of Justice with committing the offences, at Imperial’s refinery in Nanticoke, Ontario, of: (a) discharging or causing or permitting the discharge of a petroleum product into a watercourse contrary to section 30(1) of the Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 40, as amended (the “OWRA”); (b) failing to forthwith notify the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks of the discharge contrary to section 30(2) of the OWRA; and (c) discharging or causing or permitting the discharge of a petroleum product into the natural environment contrary to section 14(1) of the Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.19, as amended. These offences were alleged to have occurred between May 31, 2019 and June 3, 2019. No determination of impact can be made at this time.
Refer to the relevant portions of note 9. Litigation"Litigation and other contingenciescontingencies" of the “Financial section”"Financial section" of this report for additional information on legal proceedings.
Imperial has elected to use a US $1 million threshold for disclosing environmental proceedings.
Item 4.
Item 4.     Mine safety disclosures
Not applicable.

31
32

Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5.
Item 5. Market for registrant’s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities
Market information
The company’s common shares are listed and trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange in Canada, and have unlisted trading privileges and trade on the NYSE American LLC in the United States. The symbol for the company’s common shares on these exchanges is IMO.
As of February 15, 20222024 there were
9,826 9,026holders of record of common shares of the company.
Information for security holders outside Canada
Cash dividends paid to shareholders resident in countries with which Canada has an income tax convention are usually subject to a Canadian
non-resident
withholding tax of 15 percent, but may vary from one tax convention to another.
The withholding tax is reduced to 5 percent on dividends paid to a corporation resident in the U.S. that owns at least 10 percent of the voting shares of the company.
The company is a qualified foreign corporation for purposes of the reduced U.S. capital gains tax rates, which are applicable to dividends paid by U.S. domestic corporations and qualified foreign corporations.
There is no Canadian tax on gains from selling shares or debt instruments owned by
non-residents
not carrying on business in Canada, as long as the shareholder does not, in any given 60 month period, own 25 percent or more of the shares of the company.
Canada has approved several positions with respect to the
Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty
Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting
(“MLI”
("MLI")
,
which may impact the taxability of dividends and capital gains in Canada if the shareholder’s country of residence has also approved these same positions of the MLI.
Between October 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021, pursuant toDuring the company’s restricted stock unit plan, 6,725 shares were issued to employeesfourth quarter, the company did not issue or former employees outside the U.S. in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act.    
sell any unregistered equity securities.
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans
Sections of the company’s management proxy circular are contained in the “Proxy"Proxy information section”section", starting on page 111.112. The company’s management proxy circular is prepared in accordance with Canadian securities regulations.
Reference is made to the section under the “Company"Company executives and executive compensation”compensation":
Entitled "Performance graph" within the "Compensation discussion and analysis" section on page 169 of this report; and
Entitled "Equity compensation plan information", within the "Compensation discussion and analysis", on page 182 of this report.


Entitled “Performance graph” within the “Compensation discussion and analysis” section on page 170 of this report; and
Entitled “Equity compensation plan information”, within the “Compensation discussion and analysis”, on page 176 of this report.
32
33

Table of Contents
Issuer purchases of equity securities

  Total number of
shares purchased
   Average price paid
per share
(Canadian dollars)
   Total number of
shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced plans
or programs
   Maximum number
of shares that may
yet be purchased
under the plans or
programs (a)
 
Total number of
shares purchased
Average price paid
per share
(Canadian dollars)
Total number of
shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced plans
or programs
Maximum number
of shares that may
yet be purchased
under the plans or
programs (a) (b)
October 2021
            
October 2023October 2023 
(October 1 - October 31)
  
 
2,846,704
 
  
 
42.70
 
  
 
2,846,704
 
  
 
23,627,643
 
(October 1 - October 31)11,722,03581.7211,722,035
November 2021
            
November 2023November 2023 
(November 1 - November 30)
  
 
7,089,309
 
  
 
43.49
 
  
 
7,089,309
 
  
 
16,538,334
 
(November 1 - November 30)
December 2021
            
December 2023December 2023  
(December 1 - December 31)
  
 
7,602,184
 
  
 
43.63
 
  
 
7,602,184
 
  
 
8,936,150
 
(December 1 - December 31)19,108,28078.5019,108,280
(a)On June 27, 2023, the company announced by news release that it had received final approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange for a new normal course issuer bid to continue its existing share purchase program. The program enabled the company to purchase up to a maximum of 29,207,635 common shares during the period June 29, 2023 to June 28, 2024. This maximum included shares purchased under the normal course issuer bid and from Exxon Mobil Corporation concurrent with, but outside of, the normal course issuer bid. As in the past, Exxon Mobil Corporation advised the company that it intended to participate to maintain its ownership percentage at approximately 69.6 percent. Imperial accelerated share purchases under the normal course issuer bid program, and the program completed on October 19, 2023 as a result of the company purchasing the maximum allowable number of shares under the program.
(b)On November 3, 2023, the company commenced a substantial issuer bid pursuant to which it offered to purchase for cancellation up to $1.5 billion of its common shares through a modified Dutch auction and proportionate tender offer. The substantial issuer bid was completed on December 13, 2023, with the company taking up and paying for 19,108,280 common shares at a price of $78.50 per share, for an aggregate purchase of $1.5 billion and 3.4 percent of Imperial’s issued and outstanding shares at the close of business on October 30, 2023. This included 13,299,349 shares purchased from Exxon Mobil Corporation by way of a proportionate tender to maintain its ownership percentage at approximately 69.6 percent.
(a)On June 27, 2023, the company announced by news release that it had received final approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange for a new normal course issuer bid to continue its existing share purchase program. The program enabled the company to purchase up to a maximum of 29,207,635 common shares during the period June 29, 2023 to June 28, 2024. This maximum included shares purchased under the normal course issuer bid and from Exxon Mobil Corporation concurrent with, but outside of, the normal course issuer bid. As in the past, Exxon Mobil Corporation advised the company that it intended to participate to maintain its ownership percentage at approximately 69.6 percent. Imperial accelerated share purchases under the normal course issuer bid program, and the program completed on October 19, 2023 as a result of the company purchasing the maximum allowable number of shares under the program.
(b)On November 3, 2023, the company commenced a substantial issuer bid pursuant to which it offered to purchase for cancellation up to $1.5 billion of its common shares through a modified Dutch auction and proportionate tender offer. The substantial issuer bid was completed on December 13, 2023, with the company taking up and paying for 19,108,280 common shares at a price of $78.50 per share, for an aggregate purchase of $1.5 billion and 3.4 percent of Imperial’s issued and outstanding shares at the close of business on October 30, 2023. This included 13,299,349 shares purchased from Exxon Mobil Corporation by way of a proportionate tender to maintain its ownership percentage at approximately 69.6 percent.
(a)
On June 23, 2021, the company announced by news release that it had received final approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange for a new normal course issuer bid and will continue its existing share purchase program. The program enables the company to purchase up to a maximum of 35,583,671 common shares during the period June 29, 2021 to June 28, 2022. This maximum includes shares purchased under the normal course issuer bid and from Exxon Mobil Corporation concurrent with, but outside of the normal course issuer bid. As in the past, Exxon Mobil Corporation has advised the company that it intends to participate to maintain its ownership percentage at approximately 69.6 percent. The program will end should the company purchase the maximum allowable number of shares, or on June 28, 2022.

In accordance with the company’s announcement in November 2021 that it intended to accelerate purchases under the normal course issuer bid, the program was subsequently completed on January 31, 2022 as a result of the company purchasing the maximum allowable number of shares under the program. The company will continue to evaluate the renewal of its normal course issuer bid share purchase program in June 20222024 in the context of its overall capital activities.
Purchase plans may be modified at any time without prior notice.

Item 7.
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
Reference is made to the section entitled “Management’sItem 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” in the “Financial section”, starting on page 48 of this report.
operations
Item 7A.
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
Reference is made to the section entitled “Market risks”"Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations" in the “Financial section”"Financial section", starting on page 49 of this report.

Item 7A. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
Reference is made to the section entitled "Market risks" in the "Financial section", starting on page 6364 of this report. All statements other than historical information incorporated in this Item 7A are forward-looking statements. The actual impact of future market changes could differ materially due to, among other things, factors discussed in this report.




33
34

Item 8.
Financial statements and supplementary data
Item 8. Financial statements and supplementary data
Reference is made to the table of contents in the “Financial section”"Financial section" on page 4243 of this report:
Consolidated financial statements, together with the report thereon of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (
PCAOB ID: 
271), Calgary, Canada dated February 23, 2022, beginning with the section entitled “Report of independent registered public accounting firm” on page 72 and continuing through note 17, “Other comprehensive income (loss) information” on page 106;
Consolidated financial statements, together with the report thereon of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PCAOB ID: 271), Calgary, Canada dated February 28, 2024, beginning with the section entitled "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" on page 72 and continuing through note 18, "Divestment activities" on page 107;
“Supplemental information on oil and gas exploration and production activities” (unaudited) starting on page 107.
"Supplemental information on oil and gas exploration and production activities" (unaudited) starting on page 108.

Item 9.
Changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure
Item 9. Changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure
None.

Item 9A.
Item 9A. Controls and procedures
As indicated in the certifications in Exhibit 31 of this report, the company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2021.2023. Based on that evaluation, these officers have concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to them in a manner that allows for timely decisions regarding required disclosures and are effective in ensuring that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Reference is made to page 71 of this report for “Management’s"Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting”reporting" and page 72 for the “Report"Report of independent registered public accounting firm”Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" on the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021.2023.
There has not been any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.
Other information
None.
Item 9B. Other information
During the three months ended December 31, 2023, none of the company's directors or officers adopted or terminated a "Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement" or "non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement," as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.

Item 9C.
Item 9C. Disclosure regarding foreign jurisdiction that prevents inspections
Not applicable.

34
35

Table of Contents
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, executive officers and corporate governance
Item 10. Directors, executive officers and corporate governance
Sections of the company’s management proxy circular are contained in the “Proxy"Proxy information section”section", starting on page 111.112. The company’s management proxy circular is prepared in accordance with Canadian securities regulations.
The company currently has seven directors. The articles of the company require that the board have between five and fifteen directors. Each director is elected to hold office until the close of the next annual meeting. Each of the seven individuals listed in the section entitled “Nominees"Nominees for director”director" on pages 112113 to 115117 of this report have been nominated for election at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held May 3, 2022.April 30, 2024. All of the nominees, with the exception of N.A. Hansen, are now directors and have been since the dates indicated. M.R. Crocker is a current director and has chosen not to stand for re-election. K.T. Hoeg, J.M. Mintz and D.S. Sutherland retired from the board on May 2, 2023 as they reached the company's mandatory retirement age for directors.
Reference is made to the section under “Nominees"Nominees for director”director":
“Director nominee tables”, on pages 112 to 115 of this report;
"Director nominee tables", on pages 113 to 117 of this report;
Reference is made to the sections under “Corporate"Corporate governance disclosure”disclosure":
“Skills and experience of our board members and nominees”, on page 120 of this report.
"Skills and experience of our board members and nominees", on page 122 of this report.
“Other public company directorships of our board members and nominees”, on page 124 of this report.
"Other public company directorships of our board members and nominees", on page 127 of this report.
The table entitled “Audit committee” under “Board and committee structure”, on page 133 of this report;
The table entitled "Audit committee" under "Board and committee structure", on page 137 of this report;
“Ethical business conduct”, starting on page 145 of this report; and
"Ethical business conduct", starting on page 150 of this report;
“Largest shareholder”, on page 149 of this report.
"Largest shareholder", on page 154 of this report.
Reference is made to the sections under “Company"Company executives and executive compensation”compensation":
“Named executive officers of the company” and “Other executive officers of the company”, on pages 151 to 153 of this report.
"Named executive officers of the company" and "Other executive officers of the company", on pages 156 to 157 of this report.

Item 11.
Executive compensation
Item 11. Executive compensation
Sections of the company’s management proxy circular are contained in the “Proxy"Proxy information section”section", starting on page 111.112. The company’s management proxy circular is prepared in accordance with Canadian securities regulations.
Reference is made to the sections under “Corporate"Corporate governance disclosure”disclosure":
“Director compensation”, on pages 137 to 143 of this report; and
"Director compensation", on pages 141 to 149 of this report; and
“Share ownership guidelines of independent directors and chairman, president and chief executive officer”, on page 144 of this report.
"Share ownership guidelines of independent directors and chairman, president and chief executive officer", on page 149 of this report.
Reference is made to the following sections under “Company"Company executives and executive compensation”compensation":
"Letter to shareholders", on page 159 of this report; and
"Compensation discussion and analysis", on pages 158 to 187 of this report.

“Letter to shareholders from the executive resources committee on executive compensation”, starting on page 154 of this report; and
“Compensation discussion and analysis”, on pages 156 to 178 of this report.
35
36

Item 12. Security ownership of Contentscertain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters
Item 12.
Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters
Sections of the company’s management proxy circular are contained in the “Proxy"Proxy information section”section", starting on page 111.112. The company’s management proxy circular is prepared in accordance with Canadian securities regulations.
Reference is made to the section under “Company"Company executives and executive compensation”compensation" entitled “Equity"Equity compensation plan information”information", within the “Compensation"Compensation discussion and analysis”analysis" section, on page 176182 of this report.
Reference is made to the section under “Corporate"Corporate governance disclosure”disclosure" entitled “Largest shareholder”"Largest shareholder", on page 149154 of this report.
Reference is also made to the security ownership information for directors and executive officers of the company under the preceding Items 10 and 11. The compensation of the directors and executive officers of the company for the year-endedyear ended December 31, 20212023 is described in the sections under “Nominees"Nominees for director”director" starting on page 112, “Director compensation”113, "Director compensation" starting on page 137141 and “Company"Company executives and executive compensation”compensation" starting on page 151.156. The following table shows the number of Imperial Oil Limited and Exxon Mobil Corporation common shares owned and restricted stock units held by each named executive officer, and the incumbent directors and executive officers as a group, as of February 15, 2022.
2024.

          Imperial Oil Limited       Exxon Mobil Corporation
Named executive officer
Common
shares (a)
Restricted
stock units (b)
Common
shares (a)
Restricted
stock units (b)
B.W. Corson— 410,400 129,044 59,700 
D.E. Lyons— 114,400 10,780 4,800 
S.P. Younger— 66,100 11,025 10,300 
B.A. Jolly13,498 76,300 — — 
S.L. Evers2,922 39,600 — — 
Incumbent directors and executive
officers as a group (16 people)
40,921 853,450 175,823 225,123 
(a)No common shares are beneficially owned by reason of exercisable options. None of these individuals owns more than 0.01 percent of the outstanding shares of Imperial Oil Limited or Exxon Mobil Corporation. The directors and officers as a group own less than 0.01 percent of the outstanding shares of Imperial Oil Limited, and less than 0.01 percent of the outstanding shares of Exxon Mobil Corporation. Information not being within the knowledge of the company has been provided by the directors and the executive officers individually.
(b)Restricted stock units do not carry voting rights prior to the issuance of shares on settlement of the awards.

   
Imperial Oil Limited
   
Exxon Mobil Corporation
 
Named executive officer  Common
shares (a)
   Restricted
stock units (b)
   Common
shares (a)
   Restricted
stock units (b)
 
B.W. Corson
   -    234,600    114,686    88,000 
D.E. Lyons
   -    78,000    10,046    14,400 
S.P. Younger
   -    32,400    9,457    19,900 
B.A. Jolly
   31,361    68,600    -    - 
J.R. Wetmore
   14,939    56,900    -    - 
Incumbent directors and executive
officers as a group (17 people)
   130,655    649,550    160,390    240,200 
(a)
No common shares are beneficially owned by reason of exercisable options. None of these individuals owns more than 0.01 percent of the outstanding shares of Imperial Oil Limited or Exxon Mobil Corporation. The directors and officers as a group own approximately 0.02 percent of the outstanding shares of Imperial Oil Limited, and less than 0.01 percent of the outstanding shares of Exxon Mobil Corporation. Information not being within the knowledge of the company has been provided by the directors and the executive officers individually.
(b)
Restricted stock units do not carry voting rights prior to the issuance of shares on settlement of the awards.
36
37

Item 13.
Certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence
Item 13. Certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence
Sections of the company’s management proxy circular are contained in the “Proxy"Proxy information section”section", starting on page 111.112. The company’s management proxy circular is prepared in accordance with Canadian securities regulations.
Reference is made to the section under “Corporate"Corporate governance disclosure”disclosure" entitled “Independence"Independence of our board members and nominees”nominees", on page 121123 of this report.
Reference is made to the section under “Corporate"Corporate governance disclosure”disclosure" entitled “Transactions"Transactions with Exxon Mobil Corporation”Corporation", on page 149154 of this report.
As an employee of Exxon Mobil Corporation, M.R. Crocker is deemed a
non-independent
member of the board of directors and the executive resources committee, public policysafety and corporate responsibilitysustainability committee, nominations and corporate governance committee and community collaboration and engagementfinance committee under the relevant standards. AsMr. Crocker has chosen not to stand for re-election. Director nominee N.A. Hansen is an employee of Exxon Mobil Corporation and if elected will also be deemed a non-independent director. As employees of Exxon Mobil Corporation, M.R. Crocker is, and N.A. Hansen will be, independent of the company’s management and is able to assist these committees by reflecting the perspective of the company’s shareholders.
37
38

Table of Contents
Item 14. Principal accountant fees and services
Auditor information
The audit committee of the board of directors recommends that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) be reappointed as the auditor of the company until the close of the next annual meeting. PwC has been the auditor of the company for more than five years and are located in Calgary, Alberta. PwC is a participating audit firm with the Canadian Public Accountability Board.Board and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB).
Auditor fees
The aggregate fees of PwC for professional services rendered for the audit of the company’s financial statements and other services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20212023 and December 31, 20202022 were as follows:

thousands of Canadian dollars2023 2022 
Audit fees2,200 2,190 
Audit-related fees97 92 
Tax fees — 
All other fees — 
Total fees2,297 2,282 
thousands of Canadian dollars
  
2021
   2020 
Audit fees
  
 
1,890
 
   1,910 
Audit-related fees
  
 
92
 
   92 
Tax fees
  
 
-
 
   - 
All other fees
  
 
-
 
   - 
Total fees
  
 
1,982
 
   2,002 
Audit fees included the audit of the company’s annual financial statements, internal control over financial reporting, and a review of the first three quarterly financial statements in 2021.2023. Audit-related fees consisted of other assurance services including the audit of the company’s retirement plan and royalty statement audits for oil and gas producing entities. The company did not engage the auditor for any other services.
The audit committee formally and annually evaluates the performance of the external auditor, recommends the external auditor to be appointed by the shareholders, recommends their remuneration and oversees their work. The audit committee also approves the proposed current year audit program of the external auditor, assesses the results of the program after the end of the program period and approves in advance any
non-audit
services to be performed by the external auditor after considering the effect of such services on their independence.
All of the services rendered by the auditor to the company were approved by the audit committee.
Auditor independence
The audit committee continuallyperiodically discusses with PwC their independence from the company and from management. PwC have confirmed that they are independent with respect to the company within the meaning of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Chartered Professional Accountants of Alberta, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)PCAOB and the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC. The company has concluded that the auditor’s independence has been maintained.

38
39

Table of Contents
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, financial statement schedules
Reference is made to the table
of contents in the “Financial section” "Financial section"
on page 4243 of this report.
The following exhibits, numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation
S-K,
are filed as part of this report:

(3)Restated certificate and articles of incorporation of the company (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (3.1) to the company’s Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2006 (File No. 0-12014)).
By-laws of the company (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (3)(ii) to the company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-12014)).
(4)Description of capital stock. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (4)(vi) of the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (File No. 0-12014)).
(10)(ii)(1)Alberta Cold Lake Transition Agreement, effective January 1, 2000, relating to the royalties payable in respect of the Cold Lake production project and terminating the Alberta Cold Lake Crown Agreement dated June 25, 1984. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10)(ii)(20) of the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (File No. 0-12014)).
  Syncrude Bitumen Royalty Option Agreement, dated November 18, 2008, setting out the terms of the exercise by the Syncrude Joint Venture owners of the option contained in the existing Crown Agreement to convert to a royalty payable on the value of bitumen, effective January 1, 2009 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.01(10)(ii)(2) of the company’s Form 8-K filed on November 19, 2008 (File No. 0-12014)).
(iii)(A)(1)Form of Letter relating to Supplemental Retirement Income (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10)(c)(3) of the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1980 (File No. 2-9259)).
(2)Deferred Share Unit Plan for Nonemployee Directors. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10)(iii)(A)(6) of the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 0-12014)).
Amended Restricted Stock Unit Plan with respect to Restricted Stock Units granted in 2016 and subsequent years, as amended effective October 26, 2016 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 9.01(c)[10(iii)(A)(1)] of the company’s Form 8-K filed on October 31, 2016 (File No. 0-12014)).
Amended Restricted Stock Unit Plan with respect to Restricted Stock Units granted in 2020 and subsequent years, as amended effective November 24, 2020 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10)(iii)(A)(6) of the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (File No. 0-12014)).
Amended Restricted Stock Unit Plan with respect to Restricted Stock Units granted in 2022 and subsequent years, as amended effective November 29, 2022 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10)(iii)(A)(7) of the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (File No. 0-12014)).
Amended Short Term Incentive Program, as amended effective December 1, 2023.
(21)Imperial Oil Resources Limited is incorporated in Alberta, Canada and Canada Imperial Oil Limited is incorporated in Canada, and both are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the company. The names of all other subsidiaries of the company are omitted because, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of December 31, 2023.
40

(3) (i)
  Restated certificate and articles of incorporation of the company (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (3.1) to the company’s Form
8-K
filed on May 3, 2006 (File
No. 0-12014)).
 (ii)
  
By-laws
of the company (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (3)(ii) to the company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File
No. 0-12014)).
(4) (vi)
  Description of capital stock. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (4)(vi) of the company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2019 (File
No. 0-12014)).
(10)
 (ii)  (1) Alberta Cold Lake Transition Agreement, effective January 1, 2000, relating to the royalties payable in respect of the Cold Lake production project and terminating the Alberta Cold Lake Crown Agreement dated June 25, 1984. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10)(ii)(20) of the company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001 (File
No. 0-12014)).
     (2)
 Syncrude Bitumen Royalty Option Agreement, dated November 18, 2008, setting out the terms of the
exercise by the Syncrude Joint Venture owners of the option contained in the existing Crown Agreement
to convert to a royalty payable on the value of bitumen, effective January 1, 2009 (Incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 1.01(10)(ii)(2) of the company’s Form
8-K
filed on November 19, 2008 (File
No. 0-12014)).
(iii)(A)
  (1) 
Form of Letter relating to Supplemental Retirement Income (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10)(c)(3) of the company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1980 (File
No. 2-9259)).
   (2) 
Deferred Share Unit Plan for Nonemployee Directors. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10)(iii)(A)(6) of the company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File
No. 0-12014)).
   (3)
 
Amended Restricted Stock Unit Plan with respect to Restricted Stock Units granted in 2011 and subsequent years, as amended effective November 14, 2011 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 9.01(c)[10(iii)(A)(1)] of the company’s Form
8-K
filed on February 23, 2012 (File
No. 0-12014)).
   (4)
 
Amended Restricted Stock Unit Plan with respect to Restricted Stock Units granted in 2016 and subsequent years, as amended effective October 26, 2016 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 9.01(c)[10(iii)(A)(1)] of the company’s Form
8-K
filed on October 31, 2016 (File
No. 0-12014)).
   (5)
 
Amended Short Term Incentive Program with respect to awards granted in 2016 and subsequent years, as amended effective October 26, 2016 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 9.01(c)[10(iii)(A)(1)] of the company’s Form
8-K
filed on October 31, 2016 (File
No. 0-12014)).
   (6)
 
Amended Restricted Stock Unit Plan with respect to Restricted Stock Units granted in 2020 and subsequent years, as amended effective November 24, 2020 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10)(iii)(A)(6) of the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (File
No. 0-12014)).
(21)    
Imperial Oil Resources Limited is incorporated in Alberta, Canada and Canada Imperial Oil Limited is incorporated in Canada, and both are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the company. The names of all other subsidiaries of the company are omitted because, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of December 31, 2021.
   
Certification by principal executive officer of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a).
   
Certification by principal financial officer of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a).
39

Certification by principal executive officer of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
Certification by principal financial officer of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).
Certification by chief executive officer of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b)
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
Certification by chief financial officer of Periodic Financial Report pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b)
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
SEC Rule 10D-1 Policy for the Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation effective December 1, 2023.
(101)
Interactive Data Files (formatted as Inline XBRL).
(104)
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).
Copies of Exhibits may be acquired upon written request of any shareholder to the vice president, investor relations, Imperial Oil Limited, 505 Quarry Park Boulevard S.E., Calgary, Alberta T2C 5N1, and payment of processing and mailing costs.
Item 16. Form
10-K
summary
Not applicable.
40
41

Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf on February 23, 202228, 2024 by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

         Imperial Oil Limited
           by_____/s/ Bradley W. Corson
            by /s/ Bradley W. Corson
(Bradley W. Corson)
Chairman, president and chief executive officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on February 23, 202228, 2024 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.

SignatureTitle
SignatureTitle
/s/ Bradley W. Corson
Chairman, president and
chief executive officer and director
(Principal executive officer)
(Bradley W. Corson)
(Principal executive officer)
/s/ Daniel E. Lyons
Senior vice-president,
finance and administration, and controller
(Daniel E. Lyons)
(Principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
accounting officer) (Daniel E. Lyons)
/s/ David W. Cornhill
Director
(David W. Cornhill)
/s/ Matthew R. Crocker
Director
(Matthew R. Crocker)
/s/ Sharon R. DriscollDirector
(Sharon R. Driscoll)
/s/ John N. FlorenDirector
 (John N. Floren)
/s/ Krystyna T. HoegGary J. GoldbergDirector
(Krystyna T. Hoeg)
 (Gary J. Goldberg)
/s/ Miranda C. Hubbs
Director
(Miranda C. Hubbs)
/s/ Jack M. Mintz
Director
(Jack M. Mintz)
/s/ David S. Sutherland
Director
(David S. Sutherland)
41
42

Table of Contents
Financial section
Table of contents
Page
43
44
48
48
49
52
59
62
63
65
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
2. Business segments
100
101
102
104
104
105
106
18. Divestment activities
Supplemental information on oil and gas exploration and production activities (unaudited)107

42
43

Table of Contents
Financial information (U.S. GAAP)

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Revenues50,702 59,413 37,508 
Net income (loss):
Upstream2,512 3,645 1,395 
Downstream2,301 3,622 895 
Chemical164 204 361 
Corporate and other(88)(131)(172)
Net income (loss)4,889 7,340 2,479 
Cash and cash equivalents at year-end864 3,749 2,153 
Total assets at year-end41,199 43,524 40,782 
Long-term debt at year-end4,011 4,033 5,054 
Total debt at year-end4,132 4,155 5,176 
Other long-term obligations at year-end3,851 3,467 3,897 
Shareholders’ equity at year-end22,222 22,413 21,735 
Cash flow from operating activities3,734 10,482 5,476 
Per share information (Canadian dollars)
Net income (loss) per common share - basic8.51 11.47 3.48 
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted8.49 11.44 3.48 
Dividends per common share - declared1.94 1.46 1.03 
millions of Canadian dollars
  
 
2021
 
  2020   2019 
Revenues
  
 
37,508
 
  22,284   34,002 
Net income (loss):
    
Upstream
  
 
1,395
 
  (2,318  1,348 
Downstream
  
 
895
 
  553   961 
Chemical
  
 
361
 
  78   108 
Corporate and other
  
 
(172
  (170  (217
Net income (loss)
  
 
2,479
 
  (1,857  2,200 
Cash and cash equivalents at
year-end
  
 
2,153
 
  771   1,718 
Total assets at
year-end
  
 
40,782
 
  38,031   42,187 
Long-term debt at
year-end
  
 
5,054
 
  4,957   4,961 
Total debt at
year-end
  
 
5,176
 
  5,184   5,190 
Other long-term obligations at
year-end
  
 
3,897
 
  4,100   3,637 
Shareholders’ equity at
year-end
  
 
21,735
 
  21,418   24,276 
Cash flow from operating activities
  
 
5,476
 
  798   4,429 
Per share information
(Canadian dollars)
    
Net income (loss) per common share - basic
  
 
3.48
 
  (2.53  2.88 
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted
  
 
3.48
 
  (2.53  2.88 
Dividends per common share - declared
  
 
1.03
 
  0.88   0.85 
43
44

Table of Contents
Frequently used terms
Listed below are definitions of several of Imperial’sthe company’s key business and financial performance measures. The definitions are provided to facilitate understanding of the terms and how they are calculated. TheseCertain measures included in this document are not prescribed by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). These measures constitute
“non-GAAP
"non-GAAP financial measures”measures" under Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation G and “specifiedItem 10(e) of Regulation S-K, and "specified financial measures”measures" under National Instrument
52-112
Non-GAAP
and Other Financial Measures Disclosure
of the Canadian Securities Administrators.

Reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measure, and other information required by these regulations, have been provided.
Non-GAAP
financial measures and specified financial measures are not standardized financial measures under GAAP and do not have a standardized definition. As such, these measures may not be directly comparable to measures presented by other companies, and should not be considered a substitute for GAAP financial measures.
Capital employed
Capital employed is a
non-GAAP
financial measure that is a measurement of net investment. When viewed from the perspective of how capital is used by the business, it includes the company’s property, plant and equipment and other assets, less liabilities, excluding both short-term and long-term debt. When viewed from the perspective of the sources of capital employed in total for the company, it includes total debt and equity. The most directly comparable financial measure that is disclosed in the financial statements is total assets within the company’s Consolidated balance sheet. Both of these views include the company’s share of amounts applicable to equity companies, which the company believes should be included to provide a more comprehensive measurement of capital employed.
Reconciliation of capital employed

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
From the Consolidated balance sheet
Business uses: asset and liability perspective
Total assets41,199 43,524 40,782 
Less:Total current liabilities excluding notes and loans payable(6,482)(8,776)(5,432)
Total long-term liabilities excluding long-term debt(8,363)(8,180)(8,439)
Add:Imperial’s share of equity company debt21 25 20 
Total capital employed26,375 26,593 26,931 
Total company sources: Debt and equity perspective
Notes and loans payable121 122 122 
Long-term debt4,011 4,033 5,054 
Shareholders’ equity22,222 22,413 21,735 
Add:Imperial’s share of equity company debt21 25 20 
Total capital employed26,375 26,593 26,931 

millions of Canadian dollars  
2021
   2020   2019 
From the Consolidated balance sheet
      
Business uses: asset and liability perspective
      
Total assets
  
 
40,782
 
   38,031    42,187 
Less:
  Total current liabilities excluding notes and loans payable  
 
(5,432
   (3,153   (4,366
  Total long-term liabilities excluding long-term debt  
 
(8,439
   (8,276   (8,355
Add: Imperial’s share of equity company debt
  
 
20
 
   26    24 
Total capital employed
  
 
26,931
 
   26,628    29,490 
Total company sources: Debt and equity perspective
      
Notes and loans payable
  
 
122
 
   227    229 
Long-term debt
  
 
5,054
 
   4,957    4,961 
Shareholders’ equity
  
 
21,735
 
   21,418    24,276 
Add: Imperial’s share of equity company debt
  
 
20
 
   26    24 
Total capital employed
  
 
26,931
 
   26,628    29,490 
44
45

Table of Contents
Return on average capital employed (ROCE)
ROCE is a
non-GAAP
ratio. From the perspective of the business segments, ROCE is annual business segment net income divided by average business segment capital employed (an average of the beginning and
end-of-year
amounts). Segment net income includes Imperial’s share of segment net income of equity companies, consistent with the definition used for capital employed, and excludes the cost of financing. Capital employed is a
non-GAAP
financial measure and is disclosed and reconciled above. The company’s total ROCE is net income excluding the
after-tax
cost of financing divided by total average capital employed. The company has consistently applied its ROCE definition for many years and views it as one of the best measures of historical capital productivity in a capital-intensive, long-term industry. Additional measures, which are more cash flow based, are used to make investment decisions.
Components of return on average capital employed

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
From the Consolidated statement of income
Net income (loss)4,889 7,340 2,479 
Financing (after-tax) including Imperial’s share of equity companies66 55 40 
Net income (loss) excluding financing4,955 7,395 2,519 
Average capital employed26,484 26,762 26,780 
Return on average capital employed (percent) – corporate total
18.7 27.6 9.4 
millions of Canadian dollars  
2021
   2020  2019 
From the Consolidated statement of income
     
Net income (loss)
  
 
2,479
 
   (1,857  2,200 
Financing
(after-tax)
including Imperial’s share of equity companies
  
 
40
 
   52   66 
Net income (loss) excluding financing
  
 
2,519
 
   (1,805  2,266 
Average capital employed
  
 
26,780
 
   28,059   29,591 
Return on average capital employed
(percent)
– corporate total
  
 
9.4
 
   (6.4  7.7 
Cash flows from operating activities and asset sales
Cash flows from operating activities and asset sales is a
non-GAAP
financial measure that is the sum of the net cash provided by operating activities and proceeds from asset sales reported in the Consolidated statement of cash flows. This cash flow reflects the total sources of cash both from operating the company’s assets and from the divesting of assets. The most directly comparable financial measure that is disclosed in the financial statements is cash flows from (used in) operating activities within the company’s Consolidated statement of cash flows. The company employs a long-standing and regular disciplined review process to ensure that assets are contributing to the company’s strategic objectives. Assets are divested when they no longer meet these objectives or are worth considerably more to others. Because of the regular nature of this activity, the company believes it is useful for investors to consider sales proceeds together with cash provided by operating activities when evaluating cash available for investment in the business and financing activities, including shareholder distributions.
Reconciliation of cash flows from (used in) operating activities and asset sales

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
From the Consolidated statement of cash flows
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities3,734 10,482 5,476 
Proceeds from asset sales86 904 81 
Total cash flows from (used in) operating activities and asset sales3,820 11,386 5,557 

millions of Canadian dollars
  
 
2021
 
   2020    2019 
From the Consolidated statement of cash flows
      
Cash flows from operating activities
  
 
5,476
 
   798    4,429 
Proceeds from asset sales
  
 
81
 
   82    82 
Total cash flows from operating activities and asset sales
  
 
5,557
 
   880    4,511 
45
46

Table of Contents
Operating costs
Operating costs is a
non-GAAP
financial measure that are the costs during the period to produce, manufacture, and otherwise prepare the company’s products for sale – including energy costs, staffing and maintenance costs. It excludes the cost of raw materials, taxes and interest expense and are on a
before-tax
basis. The most directly comparable financial measure that is disclosed in the financial statements is total expenses within the company’s Consolidated statement of income. While the company is responsible for all revenue and expense elements of net income, operating costs represent the expenses most directly under the company’s control and therefore, are useful in evaluating the company’s performance.
Reconciliation of operating costs
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
From the Consolidated statement of income
Total expenses44,600 50,186 34,307 
Less:
        Purchases of crude oil and products32,399 37,742 23,174 
        Federal excise tax and fuel charge2,402 2,179 1,928 
        Financing69 60 54 
Subtotal34,870 39,981 25,156 
Imperial's share of equity company expenses76 71 61 
Total operating costs9,806 10,276 9,212 

Components of operating costs

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
From the Consolidated statement of income
Production and manufacturing6,879 7,404 6,316 
Selling and general857 882 784 
Depreciation and depletion1,907 1,897 1,977 
Non-service pension and postretirement benefit82 17 42 
Exploration5 32 
Subtotal9,730 10,205 9,151 
Imperial's share of equity company expenses76 71 61 
Total operating costs9,806 10,276 9,212 


millions of Canadian dollars  
2021
   2020   2019 
From the Consolidated statement of income
      
Total expenses
  
 
34,307
 
   24,796    32,055 
Less:
      
        Purchases of crude oil and products
  
 
23,174
 
   13,293    20,946 
        Federal excise tax and fuel charge
  
 
1,928
 
   1,736    1,808 
        Financing
  
 
54
 
   64    93 
    Subtotal
  
 
25,156
 
   15,093    22,847 
Imperial’s share of equity company expenses
  
 
61
 
   64    76 
Total operating costs
  
 
9,212
 
   9,767    9,284 
Components of operating costs
      
millions of Canadian dollars  
2021
   2020   2019 
From the Consolidated statement of income
      
Production and manufacturing
  
 
6,316
 
   5,535    6,520 
Selling and general
  
 
784
 
   741    900 
Depreciation and depletion (includes impairments)
  
 
1,977
 
   3,293    1,598 
Non-service
pension and postretirement benefit
  
 
42
 
   121    143 
Exploration
  
 
32
 
   13    47 
    Subtotal
  
 
9,151
 
   9,703    9,208 
Imperial’s share of equity company expenses
  
 
61
 
   64    76 
Total operating costs
  
 
9,212
 
   9,767    9,284 
46
47

Table of Contents
Net income (loss) excluding identified items
Net income (loss) excluding identified items is a
non-GAAP
financial measure that is total net income (loss) excluding individually significant
non-operational
events with an absolute corporate total earnings impact of at least $100 million in a given quarter. The net income (loss) impact of an identified item for an individual segment in a given quarter may be less than $100 million when the item impacts several segments or several periods. The most directly comparable financial measure that is disclosed in the financial statements is net"Net income (loss)" within the company’s Consolidated statement of income. Management uses these figures to improve comparability of the underlying business across multiple periods by isolating and removing significant
non-operational
events from business results. The company believes this view provides investors increased transparency into business results and trends, and provides investors with a view of the business as seen through the eyes of management. Net income (loss) excluding identified items is not meant to be viewed in isolation or as a substitute for net income (loss) as prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. All identified items are presented on an
after-tax
basis.

Reconciliation of net income (loss) excluding identified items

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
From the Consolidated statement of income
Net income (loss) (U.S. GAAP)4,8897,3402,479
Less identified items included in Net income (loss)
Gain/(loss) on sale of assets208
Subtotal of identified items208
Net income (loss) excluding identified items4,8897,1322,479
millions of Canadian dollars  
2021
   2020  2019 
From the Consolidated statement of income
     
Net income (loss)
(U.S. GAAP)
  
 
2,479
 
   (1,857  2,200 
Less identified items included in Net income (loss)
     
        Impairments
  
 
-
 
   (1,171  - 
        Tax adjustments
  
 
-
 
   -   662 
Subtotal of identified items
  
 
-
 
   (1,171  662 
  
Net income (loss) excluding identified items
  
 
2,479
 
   (686  1,538 
47
48

Table of Contents
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
Overview
The following discussion and analysis of Imperial’sthe company’s financial results, as well as the accompanying financial statements and related notes to consolidated financial statements to which they refer, are the responsibility of the management of Imperial Oil Limited.
The company’s accounting and financial reporting fairly reflect its integrated business model involving exploration for, and production of, crude oil and natural gas,gas; manufacture, trade, transport and sale of crude oil, natural gas, petroleum products, petrochemicals and a variety of specialty products.
products; and pursuit of lower-emission business opportunities including carbon capture and storage, and lower-emission fuels.
Imperial, with its resource base, financial strength, disciplined investment approach and technology portfolio, is well-positioned to participate in substantial investments to develop new Canadian energy supplies. The company’s operatingreportable segments are Upstream, Downstream, Chemicals, and Corporate and other. The company’s integrated business model generally reduces the company’s risk from changes in commodity prices. While commodity prices depend on supply and demand and may be volatile on a short-term basis, Imperial’sthe company’s investment decisions are grounded on fundamentals reflected in its long-term business outlook, and use a disciplined approach in selecting and pursuing the most attractive investment opportunities. The corporateannual company plan is a fundamental annual management process that is the basis for setting operating and capital objectives, in addition to providingestablishes the economic assumptions used for investment evaluation purposes. Theevaluating investments and sets operating and capital objectives. ExxonMobil's Global Outlook (the Outlook), developed annually, is the foundation for the energy supplyplan assumptions. Price ranges for crude oil, including price differentials, refinery and demandchemical margins, volumes, operating costs including greenhouse gas emissions pricing, and foreign currency exchange rates are part of the company plan assumptions supporting the corporate plan is ExxonMobil’s
Outlook
for
Energy
, and corporatedeveloped annually. Company plan volume projections are based on individual field production profiles, which are also updated at least annually. Price ranges for crude oil, natural gas, including price differentials, refinery and chemical margins, volumes and operating costs including greenhouse gas emission prices and foreign currency exchange rates are based on corporate plan assumptions developed annually and are utilized for investment evaluation purposes. Major investment opportunities are evaluated over a range of potential market conditions. OnceAll major investments are made, a reappraisal process is completedreappraised to ensure relevant lessons arewe learn from our investment decisions, and the development and execution of the project. Lessons learned and improvements are incorporated into future projects.
The term “project”"project" as used in this report can refer to a variety of different activities and does not necessarily have the same meaning as in any government payment transparency reports.
48
49

Table of Contents
Business environment
Long-term business outlook
The “Long-term"Long-term business outlook”outlook" is based on Exxon Mobil Corporation’s
Global Outlook for Energy
(the
(the Outlook), which combined with the near-term pathways, is used to help inform the company’s long-term business strategies and investment plans.
The company’s business planning is underpinned by a deep understanding of long-term energymarket fundamentals. These fundamentals include energy supply and demand trends; the scale and variety of energy needs worldwide; capability, practicality and affordability of energy alternatives, including
low-carbon
solutions; greenhouse gas emission-reduction technologies; and supportiverelevant government policies. The Outlook considers these fundamentals to form the basis for the company’s long-term business planning, investment decisions, and research programs. The Outlook reflects the company’s view of global energy demand and supply through 2050. It is a projection based on current trends in technology, government policies, consumer preferences, geopolitics, and economic development. In addition,
The Outlook uses projections and scenarios from reputable third parties such as the Outlook considers a range of scenarios - including remote scenarios - to help inform perspective ofInternational Energy Agency (IEA) and the future and enhance strategic thinking over time.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Included in the range of these scenarios areare: the Intergovernmental PanelIPCC likely below 2°C scenarios and three scenarios from the IEA; IEA Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS), which reflects a sector-by-sector assessment of current policy in place or announced by governments; IEA Announced Pledges Scenario (APS), which reflects aspirational government targets met on Climate Change Lower 2°Ctime and the International Energy Agency’sin full; and IEA Net Zero Emissions (IEA NZE) by 2050 scenario. To effectively evaluate the pace of change, ExxonMobil uses many scenarios to help identify signposts to provide leading indicators of future developments and allow for timely adjustments to the Outlook. The IEA describesScenario (NZE), which the IEA NZEdescribes as extremely challenging, requiring all stakeholders – governments, businesses, investors and citizens – to take action this year and every year after so that the goal does not slip out of reach. The scenario assumes unprecedented and sustained energy efficiency gains, innovation and technology transfer, lower-emission investments, and globally coordinated greenhouse gas reduction policy. The IEA acknowledgesacknowledging that society is not currently on the IEA NZE pathway. No single transition pathway can be reasonably predicted, given the wide range of uncertainties. Key unknowns include yet-to-be-developed government policies, market conditions, and advances in technology that may influence the cost, pace, and potential availability of certain pathways. Scenarios that employ a full complement of technology options are likely to provide the most economically efficient pathways.
Using the company's own experts and third-party sources, the company monitors a variety of signposts that may indicate a potential shift in the energy transition. For example, the regional pace of the transition could be influenced by the cost of new technologies compared to existing or alternative energy sources.
By 2050, the world’s population is projected atto be around 9.7 billion people, or about 2 billion more than in 2019.2021. Coincident with this population increase, the company expectsOutlook projects worldwide economic growth to average close toapproximately 2.5 percent per year, with economic output growing by around 125110 percent by 2050 compared to 2019.2021. As economies and populations grow, and as living standards improve for billions of people, the need for energy is expected to continue to rise. Even with significant efficiency gains, global energy demand is projected to rise by almost 15 percent from 20192021 to 2050. This increase in energy demand is expected to be driven by developing countries (i.e., those that are not member nations of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)).
As expanding prosperity drives global energy demand higher, increasing use of energy-efficient technologies and practices, as well as lower-emission products, will continue to help significantly reduce energy consumption and CO2 emissions per unit of economic output over time. Substantial efficiency gains are likely in all key aspects of the world’s economy through 2050, affecting energy requirements for power generation, transportation, industrial applications, and residential and commercial needs.
Under the Outlook, global electricity demand is expected to increase almost 75about 80 percent from 20192021 to 2050, with developing countries likely to account for about 80over 75 percent of the increase. Consistent with this projection, power generation is expected to remain the largest and fastest growing major segment of global primary energy demand, supported by a wide variety of energy sources. The share of coal-fired generation is expected to decline substantially and approachto approximately 15 percent of the world’s electricity in 2050, versus nearlyapproximately 35 percent in 2019,2021, in part as a result ofdue to policies to improve air quality as well as reduce greenhouse gas emissions to address risks related to climate change. From 20192021 to 2050, the amount of electricity supplied using natural gas, nuclear power, and renewables is likelyexpected to more than double, accounting for the entire growth in electricity supplies and offsetting the reduction of coal. Electricity from wind and solar is expected to increase more than 600550 percent, helping total renewables (including other sources, i.e.e.g., hydropower) to account for aboutover 80 percent of the increase in electricity supplies worldwide through 2050. Total renewables are expected to reach about 50 percent of global electricity supplies by 2050. Natural gas and nuclear are also expected to increase shares over the period to 2050, reaching more than 25be about 20 percent and about 10 percent, respectively, of global electricity supplies respectively, by 2050. Supplies of electricity by energy type will reflect
50

significant differences across regions reflecting a wide range of factors, including the cost and availability of various energy supplies and policy developments.
49

Under the Outlook, energyEnergy for transportation - including cars, trucks, ships, trains, and airplanes - is expected to increase by almost 25over 30 percent from 20192021 to 2050. Transportation energy demand is expected to account for over 40more than 60 percent of the growth in liquid fuels demand worldwide over this period. Light-duty vehicle demand for liquid fuels is projected to peak by around 2025, and then decline to levels seen in the early-2000s by 2050, as the impact of better fuel economy and significant growth in electric cars, led by China, Europe, and the United States, work to offset growth in the worldwide car fleet of about 75almost 70 percent. By 2050, light-duty vehicles are expected to account for around 15 percent of global liquid fuels demand. During the same time period, nearly all the world’s commercial transportation fleets are expected to continue to run on liquid fuels, including biofuels, which are expected to be widely available and offer practical advantages in providing a large quantity of energy in small volumes.
Almost half of the world’s energy use is dedicated to industrial activity. As the global middle class continues to grow, demand for durable products, appliances, and consumable goods will increase. Industry uses energy products both as a fuel and as a feedstock for chemicals, asphalt, lubricants, waxes, and other specialty products. The Outlook anticipates technology advances, as well as the increasing shift toward cleaner forms of energy, such as electricity and natural gas, with coal declining. Demand for oil will continue to grow as a feedstock for industry.
As populations grow and prosperity rises, more energy will be needed to power homes, offices, schools, shopping centers, hospitals, etc. Combined residential and commercial energy demand is projected to rise by around 15 percent through 2050. Led by the growing economies of developing nations, average worldwide household electricity use will rise about 75 percent between 2021 and 2050.
Liquid fuels provide the largest share of global energy supplies today reflecting broad-based availability, affordability, ease of transportation, and fitness as a practical solution to meet a wide variety of needs. By 2050, global demand for liquid fuels is projected to grow to approximately 114110 million
oil-equivalent
barrels per day, an increase of about 1415 percent from 2019.2021. The
non-OECD
share of global liquid fuels demand is expected to increase to nearly 70 percent by 2050, as liquid fuels demand in the OECD is expected to decline by more than 20 percent. Much of the global liquid fuels demand today is met by crude production from traditional conventional sources; these supplies will remain important, and significant development activity is expected to offset much of the natural declines from these fields. At the same time, a variety of emerging supply sources - including tight oil, deepwater, oil sands, natural gas liquids, and biofuels - are expected to grow to help meet rising demand. The world’s resource base is sufficient to meet projected demand through 2050 as technology advances continue to expand the availability of economic and lower-carbon supply options. However, timelyTimely investments will remain critical to meeting global needs with reliable and affordable supplies.
Natural gas is a lower-emission, versatile and practical fuel for a wide variety of applications, and itapplications. It is expected to grow the most of any primary energy type from 20192021 to 2050, meeting about 5540 percent of global energy demand growth. Global natural gas demand is expected to rise nearly 3525 percent from 20192021 to 2050, with moregreater than half75 percent of that increase coming from the Asia Pacific region. Significant growth in supplies of unconventional gas - the natural gas found in shale and other tight rock formations - will help meet these needs. In total, about 50 percent of the growth in natural gas supplies is expected to become from unconventional sources. At the same time, conventionally-produced natural gas is likely to remain the cornerstone of global supply, meeting more than
around two-thirds
of worldwide demand in 2050. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade will expand significantly, meeting about 40 percenttwo thirds of the increase in global demand growth, with much of this supply expected to help meet rising demand in Asia Pacific.
The world’s energy mix is highly diverse and will remain so through 2050. Oil is expected to remaincontinue as the largest source of energy with its share remaining close to 30 percent in 2050. Coal is currentlyand natural gas are the secondnext largest sourcesources of energy but it is expected to lose that position to natural gas intoday, with the next few years. The share of natural gas is expectedgrowing to reach more than 25 percent by 2050, while the share of coal falls to about half that.that of natural gas. Nuclear power is projected to grow, significantly, as many nations are likely to expand nuclear capacity to address rising electricity needs as well as energy security and environmental issues. Total renewable energy is expected to exceed 20 percent of global energy by 2050, with other renewables (e.g., biomass, hydro and geothermalhydropower, geothermal) contributing a combined share of more than 10 percent. Total energy supplied from wind solar and biofuelssolar is expected to increase rapidly, growing over 420500 percent from 20192021 to 2050, when they are projected to be aboutaround 10 percent of the world energy mix.
Decarbonization of industrial activities will require a suite of nascent or future lower-carbon technologies and supporting policies. Lower-emission fuels, hydrogen-based fuels, and carbon capture and storage are three key
51

lower-carbon solutions needed to support a lower-emission future, in addition to wind and solar. Along with electrification, lower-emission fuels are expected to play an important role in decarbonization of the transportation sector, particularly in hard-to-decarbonize areas, such as aviation. Low-carbon hydrogen will be a key enabler replacing traditional furnace fuel to decarbonize the industrial sector. Hydrogen and hydrogen-based fuels like ammonia are also expected to make inroads into commercial transportation as technology improves to lower its cost and policy develops to support the needed infrastructure development. Carbon capture and storage on its own, or in combination with hydrogen production, is among the few proven technologies that could enable CO2 emission reductions from high-emitting and hard-to-decarbonize sectors such as power generation and heavy industries, including manufacturing, refining, and petrochemicals.
To meet this projected demand under the Outlook and the IEA's STEPS, the company anticipates that the world’s available oil and gas resource base will grow, not only from new discoveries, but also from increases in previously discovered fields. Technology will underpin these increases. The investments to develop and supply resources to meet global demand through 2050 will be significant. This reflects a fundamental aspect of thesignificant and would be needed to meet even rapidly declining demand for oil and natural gas business as the International Energy Agency (IEA) describesenvisioned in its
World Energy Outlook 2021
.aggressive decarbonization scenarios.
50

International accords and underlying regional and national regulations covering greenhouse gas emissions continue to evolve with uncertain timing and outcome, making it difficult to predict their business impact. Imperial’sThe company’s estimates of potential costs related to greenhouse gas emissions align with applicable provincial and federal regulations. Additionally, Imperialthe company uses ExxonMobil’s
the Outlook for Energy
as a foundation for estimating energy supply and demand requirements from various energy sources and uses, and the
Outlook for Energy
takes into account policies established to reduce energy related greenhouse gas emissions. The climate accord reached at the 2015 Conference of the Parties (COP 21) in Paris set many new goals, and many related policies are still emerging. The
Outlook for Energy
reflects an environment with increasingly stringent climate policies and is consistent with the successful achievement of the global aggregation of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), submitted by the nations that are signatories to the Paris Agreement, as available at the end of 2020, which were submitted by signatories to2022. The Outlook assumes success of these NDCs, despite the 2023 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 2015 Paris Agreement.Environment Programme (UNEP) Emissions Gap Report projecting that the G20 members will fall short of their NDCs. The
Outlook for Energy
seeks to identify potential impacts of climate related government policies, which often target specific sectors. It estimates potential impactsFor purposes of these policies on consumer energy demand by using various assumptions and tools – including, depending on the sector, and as applicable, use ofOutlook, a proxy cost on energy-related CO2 emissions is assumed, based on regional considerations and relative levels of carbon or assessment of targeted policies (i.e., automotive fuel economy standards). Aseconomic development, and by 2050, reaches up to $150 USD per metric ton for OECD nations and up to $100 USD per metric ton for non-OECD nations. China and other leading non-OECD nations are expected to trail OECD policy initiatives. Nevertheless, as people and nations look for ways to reduce risks of global climate change, they will continue to need practical solutions that do not jeopardize the affordability or reliability of the energy they need. The company continues to monitor the updates to the NDCs that nations have provided around COP 2628 in GlasgowDubai in November 20212023, as well as other policy developments in light of net zeronet-zero ambitions recently formulated by some nations, including Canada.
The information provided in the “Long-term business outlook”Outlook includes ExxonMobil's internal estimates and projections based upon ExxonMobil’s internal data and analyses, as well as publicly available information from external sources including the International Energy Agency.
Progress reducing emissions
Advancing climate solutions
Practical solutions to the world’s energy and climate challenges will benefit from market competition in addition to well-informed, well-designed and transparent policy approaches that carefully weigh costs and benefits. Such policies are likely to help manage the risks of climate change while also enabling societies to pursue other high priority goals around the world – including clean air and water, access to reliable and affordable energy, and economic progress for all people. The company encourages sound policy solutions that reduce climate-related risks across the economy at the lowest societal cost. All practical and economically viable energy sources will need to be pursued to continue meeting global energy demand, recognizing the scale and variety of worldwide energy needs, as well as the importance of expanding access to modern energy to promote better standards of living for billions of people.
Imperial has a goal to achieve net zero Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions in the company’s oil sands operations by 2050 in support of Canada’s commitment to move towards net zero emissions. To support this
net-zero
ambition, by the end of 2030 Imperial anticipates to reduce Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions intensity of its operated oil sands facilities by 30 percent, compared with 2016 levels. The company plans to achieve this through implementation of lower greenhouse gas next generation technologies at its Cold Lake operation, efficiency improvements at its facilities, and the use of carbon capture and storage. In the near term, the company remains on track to meet its previous Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions intensity goal of a 10 percent reduction for operated oil sands facilities by the end of 2023, compared to 2016 levels. In June, Imperial and its industry peers announced the launch oflaunched the Oil Sands Pathways to Net Zero alliance. Thealliance in 2021, with the goal of this unique alliance, working collectively with the federal and Alberta governments is to achieve net zeronet-zero greenhouse gas emissions from oil sands operations by 2050 to help Canada meet its climate goals.
As part of the company’s efforts to provide solutions that lower the greenhouse gas emissions intensity of its operations and provide lower life-cycle emissions products to customers, the company has announced a company-wide goal to achieve net zero emissions (Scope 1 and 2) by 2050 in its operated assets through collaboration with government and industry partners. Successful technology development and supportive fiscal
52

and regulatory frameworks will be needed to achieve this goal. This work builds on the company’s previously announced net-zero goal for operated oil sands as part of the Pathways Alliance initiative, as well as the company’s emission intensity reduction goal of 30 percent by 2030 for operated oil sands facilities when compared to 2016 levels. The company plans to achieve its net zero goal by applying oil sands recovery technologies that use less steam, implementing carbon capture and storage and implementing efficiency projects including the use of lower carbon fuels at its operations.
51


CurrentRecent business environment
In early 2020,Prior to the balance ofCOVID-19 pandemic, many companies in the industry invested below the levels needed to maintain or increase production capacity to meet anticipated demand. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this decline in investments accelerated as industry revenue collapsed, resulting in underinvestment and supply andtightness as demand for petroleum and petrochemical products experienced two significant disruptive effects. On therecovered. These reductions, along with supply chain constraints and a continuation of demand side, the
COVID-19
pandemic spread rapidly through most areas of the world resulting in substantial reductions in consumer and business activity and significantly reduced demand for crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products. This reduction in demand coincided with announcements of increased production in certain key
oil-producing
countries whichrecovery, led to increasesa steady increase in inventory levels and sharp declines in prices for crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products.
Through 2021, demand for petroleum and petrochemical products has continued to recover, with the company’s financial results benefiting from stronger prices and margins, notably prices for crude oil and natural gas as well as Chemical product margins. The company continuesprices and refining margins through 2022.

Energy markets began to closely monitor industrynormalize in 2023, down from their 2022 highs. During the first half of 2023, the price of crude oil declined, impacted by higher inventory levels. In the second half, crude oil prices increased modestly from strong demand, and global economic conditions amid this uneven global recovery fromongoing actions by OPEC+ oil producers to limit supply. In addition, the
COVID-19
pandemic which has brought unprecedented uncertainties Canadian WTI/WCS spread began to near-term economic outlooks, including recovery fromweaken in the
COVID-19
pandemic. fourth quarter, but remained in line with 2022 on an annual basis. Throughout 2023, strong demand for gasoline and distillate combined with low inventories kept refining margins strong, but short of 2022 levels on an annual basis. In the fourth quarter, refining margins dropped due to higher inventory and lower seasonal demand.
The general rate of inflation in Canada and across many other major countries experienced a brief declinepeaked in 2022, rising from already elevated levels in 2021, due to additional impacts on energy and other commodities from the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Inflation moderated in 2023 as major central banks tightened monetary policy aggressively and global GDP growth slowed. In Canada, it currently remains higher than the Bank of Canada's inflation target. Meanwhile, there are significant variations across OECD and non-OECD in the initial stagepace of the
COVID-19
pandemic. However inflation rates increasedchange in 2021 across major economies, with some regions experiencing multi-decade highs, largely reflecting overall imbalances between supply and demand recoveries from the pandemic. The underlying factors include, but are not limited to, global supply chain disruptions, shipping bottlenecks, labor market constraints and side effects from monetary and fiscal expansions. The global economic recovery remains uneven with significant uncertainty. Prices for services and materials continue to evolve in response to fast-changing commodity markets, industry activities, as well as government policies, impacting operating and capital costs.inflation. The company closely monitors market trends and works to mitigate both operating and capital cost impacts in all price environments through its economies of scale in global procurement, efficient project management practices, and general productivity improvements.environments.
Business results
Consolidated

millions of Canadian dollars
  
 
2021
 
   2020   2019 
Net income (loss)
(U.S. GAAP)
  
 
2,479
 
   (1,857  2,200 
    
Identified items included in Net income (loss)
(a)
              
Impairments
  
 
-
 
   (1,171  - 
Tax adjustments
  
 
-
 
   -   662 
Subtotal of identified items
  
 
-
 
   (1,171  662 
               
Net income (loss) excluding identified items
(a)
  
 
2,479
 
   (686  1,538 
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Net income (loss) (U.S. GAAP)
4,889 7,340 2,479 
Identified items1 included in Net income (loss)
   
Gain/(loss) on sale of assets 208 — 
Subtotal of identified items1
 208 — 
  
Net income (loss) excluding identified items1
4,889 7,132 2,479 
(a) Net income (loss) excluding identified items is a
non-GAAP
financial measure - see “Frequently used terms” section (page 44)    
2021
2023
Net income in 20212023 was $2,479$4,889 million, or $3.48$8.49 per share on a diluted basis, compared to a net loss of $1,857$7,340 million, or $2.53$11.44 per share in 2020. Prior year results2022.
2022
Net income in 2022 was $7,340 million, or $11.44 per share on a diluted basis, up from $2,479 million, or $3.48 per share in 2021. Results include unfavourablefavourable identified items
1
of $1,171$208 million after tax, related to the company’s decision to no longer develop a significant portiongain on the sale of its unconventional portfolio.
interests in XTO Energy Canada.
2020

Net loss in 2020 was $1,857 million, or $2.53 per share on a diluted basis, compared to net income of $2,200 million or $2.88 per share in 2019. Current year results reflect a
non-cash
impairment charge of $1,171 million after tax, related to the company’s decision to no longer develop a significant portion of its unconventional portfolio. Full-year 2019 results included a favourable impact of $662 million associated with the Alberta corporate income tax rate decrease.




1
non-GAAP
financial measure - see “Frequently"Frequently used terms”terms" section on page 44 for definition and reconciliation
reconciliation.
53
52

Overview
ImperialThe company produces crude oil and natural gas for sale predominantly into North American markets. Imperial’sThe company’s Upstream business strategies guide the company’s exploration, development, production, research and gas marketing activities. These strategies include improving asset reliability, accelerating development and application of high impact technologies, maximizing value by capturing new business opportunities and managing the existing portfolio, as well as pursuing sustainable improvements in organizational efficiency and effectiveness. These strategies are underpinned by a relentless focus on operations integrity, commitment to innovative technologies, disciplined approach to investing and cost management, development of employees and investment in the communities within which the company operates.
ImperialThe company has a significant oil and gas resource base and a large inventory of potential projects. The company’s current investment strategy is to invest for value and select volume growth, with focus on optimization within existing assets, cost reduction opportunities and productivity enhancements that aim to deliver robust returns at a wide range of prices. The company also continues to evaluate opportunities to support long-term growth. Although actual volumes will vary from year to year, the focus is on
value-add,
long-term growth opportunities within the context of the factors described in Item"Item 1A. “Risk factors”Risk factors". ImperialThe company continually evaluates opportunities, including crude shipments by rail and the pace of the development of its Aspen
in-situ
oil sands project, as economically justified.
The upstream industry environment has a history of significant price volatility. Market demand and prices experienced a sharp decline in the first half of 2020 largely driven by the
COVID-19
pandemic. Following this decline, prices improved in the second half of 2020 and throughout 2021, as supply and demand began to rebalance. Prices for most of the company’scompany's crude oil sold are referenced to Western Canada Select (WCS) and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil markets. Additionally, the market price for WCS is typically lower than light and medium grades of oil, and price differentials between WCS and WTI can fluctuate. Volatility in differentials can lead to government action, such as in 2019 when the Government of Alberta imposed temporary mandatory production curtailment regulations on large producers. Mandatory curtailment was eliminated in December 2020 and the regulatory authority to impose curtailment was repealed at the end of 2021.
ImperialThe company believes prices over the long term will be driven by market supply and demand, with the demand side largely being a function of general economic activity, alternative energy sources, levels of prosperity, technology advancements, consumer preference and government policies. On the supply side, prices may be significantly impacted by political events, logistics constraints, the actions of OPEC, governments, alternative energy sources, and other factors. To manage the risks associated with price, Imperialthe company tests the resiliency of its annual plans and all major investments across a range of price scenarios.
Key events
In 2021, demand for petroleum and petrochemical products continued to recover, with the company’s financial results benefiting from stronger prices compared to the prior year. The company continues to closely monitor industry and global economic conditions, including recovery from the
COVID-19
pandemic.
Upstream assetassets demonstrated strong operational performance met or exceeded expectations in 2021.2023. The company continued to benefit from its actions implemented in 2020prior years to reducemanage the cost structure and improve the reliability of its assets, enabling the Upstream to capture significant value and take advantage of the improving business environment throughout 2021.
value.

Upstream delivered its highestfull-year production in over 30 years, supported by Kearl achieving record annual totalaveraged 413,000 gross production of about 263,000oil-equivalent barrels per day (186,000 barrels Imperial’s share). The company adjusted its planned maintenance and turnaround activity atday.

At Kearl, eliminating its fall turnaround and transitioned to a single annual turnaround, one year ahead of schedule.
During 2021, Cold Lake gross production was about 140,000270,000 barrels per day driven by continued focus on(191,000 barrels Imperial’s share), up 28,000 barrels per day (19,000 barrels Imperial's share) compared to 2022, as a result of improved reliability, plant capacity utilization, and mine equipment productivity.

At Cold Lake, annual production optimization and reliability enhancements.averaged 135,000 gross oil-equivalent barrels per day.

At Syncrude, annual production averaged 76,000 gross oil-equivalent barrels per day.

As described in more detail in Item"Item 1A. “Risk factors”Risk factors", environmental risks and climate related regulations and
COVID-19
could have negative impacts on the upstream business.

53
54

Results of operations
20212023 Net income (loss) factor analysis
millions of Canadian dollars
96
(a)
Identified items are a
non-GAAP
financial measure – see “Frequently used terms” section (page 44)
Price – HigherLower bitumen realizations increased net income by about $3,640 million,were primarily driven by averagelower marker prices. Average bitumen realizations increasingdecreased by $32.22$17.25 per barrel, generally in line with WCS, and synthetic crude oil realizations increasingdecreased by $31.85$19.89 per barrel.
barrel, generally in line with WTI.

Volumes – HigherLower volumes were primarily driven by steam cycle timing at Cold Lake, and the absence of XTO Energy Canada production, balancing with market demands that occurred in 2020 increased net incomepartially offset by about $550 million.
improved reliability, plant capacity utilization, and mine equipment productivity at Kearl.

Royalty – HigherLower royalties decreased net income by about $680 million,were primarily driven by higherweakened commodity prices.

Identified items
Items1
Prior year results included unfavourablefavourable identified items
1
of $1,171 million related to the company’s decision to no longer develop a significant portioncompany's gain on the sale of its unconventional portfolio.
interests in XTO Energy Canada.

Other – All other items decreased net income by $968 million, primarily driven by higher operating expenses of about $720 million, unfavourable foreign exchange impacts of about $230 million and lower Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy received by the company compared to prior year of about $60 million, which includes Imperial’s proportionate share of a joint venture.
2020 Net income (loss) factor analysis
millions of Canadian dollars
(a)
Identified items are a
non-GAAP
financial measure – see “Frequently used terms” section (page 44)
Price – Lower realizations decreased net income by about $2,620 million.
Volumes – Lower volumes decreased net income by about $130 million.
Royalty – Lower royalties increased net income by about $540 million.
Identified items
1
Non-cash
impairment charge of $1,171 million, related to the company’s decision to no longer develop a significant portion of its unconventional portfolio. Absence of a favourable impact of $689 million associated with the Alberta corporate income tax rate decrease in 2019.
Other – All other items increased net income by $404 million, primarily driven by lower operating expenses of about $250 million,Includes favourable foreign exchange impacts of about $100$380 million, and lower operating expenses of about $70$380 million, associatedprimarily due to lower energy prices.
2022 Net income (loss) factor analysis
millions of Canadian dollars
253
Price – Higher realizations were generally in line with increases in marker prices, driven primarily by increased demand. Average bitumen realizations increased by $26.76 per barrel, generally in line with WCS, and synthetic crude oil realizations increased by $43.85 per barrel.

Volumes – Lower volumes were primarily the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy receivedresult of downtime at Kearl in the first half of the year, partly offset by higher production at Syncrude and Cold Lake.

Royalty – Higher royalties primarily driven by improved commodity prices.

Identified items1 – Results include favourable identified items1 related to the company which includes Imperial’s proportionate sharecompany's gain on the sale of a joint venture.
interests in XTO Energy Canada.

Other – Higher operating expenses of about $500 million, primarily from higher energy prices, partially offset by favourable foreign exchange impacts of about $270 million, and higher electricity sales at Cold Lake of about $60 million due to increased prices.
1
non-GAAP
financial measure - see “Frequently"Frequently used terms”terms" section on page 44 for definition and reconciliation
reconciliation.
54
55

Table of Contents
Marker prices and average realizations
Canadian dollars, unless otherwise noted2023 2022 2021 
West Texas Intermediate (US$ per barrel)
77.60 94.36 68.05 
Western Canada Select (US$ per barrel)
58.97 76.28 54.96 
WTI/WCS Spread (US$ per barrel)
18.63 18.08 13.09 
Bitumen (per barrel)
67.42 84.67 57.91 
Synthetic crude oil (per barrel)
105.57 125.46 81.61 
Conventional crude oil (per barrel)
59.30 97.45 59.84 
Natural gas liquids (per barrel)
 64.92 35.87 
Natural gas (per thousand cubic feet)
2.58 5.69 3.83 
Average foreign exchange rate (US$)
0.74 0.77 0.80 


Canadian dollars, unless otherwise noted
  
 
        2021
 
           2020            2019 
West Texas Intermediate
(US$) (per barrel)
  
 
68.05
 
   39.26    57.03 
Western Canada Select
(US$) (per barrel)
  
 
54.96
 
   26.87    44.29 
WTI/WCS Spread
(US$) (per barrel)
  
 
13.09
 
   12.39    12.74 
Bitumen
(per barrel)
  
 
57.91
 
   25.69    50.02 
Synthetic oil
(per barrel)
  
 
81.61
 
   49.76    74.47 
Conventional crude oil
(per barrel)
  
 
59.84
 
   29.34    51.81 
Natural gas liquids
(per barrel)
  
 
35.87
 
   13.85   ��22.83 
Natural gas
(per thousand cubic feet)
  
 
3.83
 
   1.90    2.05 
Average foreign exchange rate
(US$)
  
 
0.80
 
   0.75    0.75 
2021
Crude oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) - production and sales (a)
thousands of barrels per day202320222021
 grossnetgrossnetgrossnet
Bitumen326 283 316 263 326 292 
Synthetic crude oil (b)
76 67 77 63 71 62 
Conventional crude oil5 5 10 
Total crude oil production407 355 401 334 407 363 
NGLs available for sale  
Total crude oil and NGL production407 355 402 335 408 364 
Bitumen sales, including diluent (c)
442 424 451 
NGL sales (d)
 — 
Imperial’s average Canadian dollar realizations
Natural gas - production and production available for bitumen increased in 2021, generally in line with Western Canada Select. The company’s average Canadian dollar realizations for synthetic crude increase generally in line with West Texas Intermediate, adjusted for changes in exchange rates and transportation costs.
sale (a)
2020
millions of cubic feet per day202320222021
 grossnetgrossnetgrossnet
Production (e) (f)
33 32 85 83 120 115 
Production available for sale (g)
 11  50  81 
(a)Volume per day metrics are calculated by dividing the volume for the period by the number of calendar days in the period. Gross production is the company’s share of production (excluding purchases) before deduction of the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
(b)The company’s synthetic crude oil production volumes were from the company’s share of production volumes in the Syncrude joint venture and include immaterial amounts of bitumen and other products exported to the operator's facilities using an existing interconnect pipeline.
(c)Diluent is natural gas condensate or other light hydrocarbons added to crude bitumen to facilitate transportation to market by pipeline and rail.
(d)2021 NGL sales round to 0.
(e)Gross production of natural gas includes amounts used for internal consumption with the exception of the amounts re-injected.
(f)Net production is gross production less the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both. Net production reported in the above table is consistent with production quantities in the net proved reserves disclosure.
(g)Includes sales of the company’s share of net production and excludes amounts used for internal consumption.
Imperial’s average Canadian dollar realizations for bitumen decreased in 2020 primarily due to a decrease in WCS. The company’s average Canadian dollar realizations for synthetic crude decreased generally in line with WTI, adjusted for changes in exchange rates and transportation costs.2023
Crude oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) - production and sales 
(a)
            
thousands of barrels per day  
    2021
         2020         2019 
    
gross
   
net
   gross   net   gross   net 
Bitumen
  
 
326
 
  
 
292
 
   290    279    285    254 
Synthetic oil
(b)
  
 
71
 
  
 
62
 
   69    68    73    65 
Conventional crude oil
  
 
10
 
  
 
9
 
   11    10    14    13 
Total crude oil production
  
 
407
 
  
 
363
 
   370    357    372    332 
NGLs available for sale
  
 
1
 
  
 
1
 
   2    2    2    1 
Total crude oil and NGL production
  
 
408
 
  
 
      364
 
         372          359          374          333 
Bitumen sales, including diluent
(c)
  
 
451
 
        401         387      
NGL sales
(d)
  
 
-
 
        2         6      
    
Natural gas - production and production available for sale
(a)
               
millions of cubic feet per day  
    2021
         2020         2019 
    
gross
   
net
   gross   net   gross   net 
Production
(e) (f)
  
 
120
 
  
 
115
 
   154    150    145    144 
Production available for sale
(g)
       
 
81
 
        115         108 
(a)
Volume per day metrics are calculated by dividing the volume for the period by the number of calendar days in the period. Gross production is the company’s share of production (excluding purchases) before deduction of the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both.
(b)
The company’s synthetic oil production volumes were from the company’s share of production volumes in the Syncrude joint venture.
(c)
Diluent is natural gas condensate or other light hydrocarbons added to crude bitumen to facilitate transportation to market by pipeline and rail.
(d)
2021 NGL sales round to 0.
(e)
Gross production of natural gas includes amounts used for internal consumption with the exception of the amounts
re-injected.
(f)
Net production is gross production less the mineral owners’ or governments’ share or both. Net production reported in the above table is consistent with production quantities in the net proved reserves disclosure.
(g)
Includes sales of the company’s share of net production and excludes amounts used for internal consumption.
2021
Higher bitumen production atwas mainly attributable to Kearl, wasand primarily driven by the absence of prior year production balancing with market demands.
improved reliability, plant capacity utilization, and mine equipment productivity.
2020
2022
Kearl achieved the highest annual production in the asset’s history. ImprovedLower bitumen production was mainly dueattributable to Kearl, and primarily a result of downtime in the additionfirst half of supplemental crushing facilities in 2020, partially offset by the balancing of near term production with demand through the advancement and extension of planned turnaround activities.
year.
55
56

Table of Contents
Downstream
Overview
Imperial’sThe company’s Downstream serves predominantly Canadian markets with refining, trading, logistics and marketing activities. Imperial’sThe company's Downstream business strategies competitively position the company across a range of market conditions. These strategies include targeting industry leadingindustry-leading performance in reliability, safety and operations integrity, as well as maximizing value from advanced technologies, capitalizing on integration across Imperial’sthe company’s businesses, selectively investing for resilient and advantaged returns, operating efficiently and effectively, and providing quality, valued and differentiated products and services to customers.
ImperialThe company owns and operates three refineries in Canada with aggregate distillation capacity of 428,000433,000 barrels per day. Refining margins are largely driven by differences in commodity prices and are a function of the difference between what a refinery pays for its raw materials (primarily crude oil) and the market prices for the range of products produced (primarily gasoline, heating oil, diesel oil, jet fuel, fuel oil and asphalt). Crude oil and many products are widely traded atwith published prices, including those quoted on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Prices for these commodities are determined by the global and regional marketplaces and are influenced by many factors, including global and regional supply / demand balances, inventory levels, industry refinery operations, import / export balances, currency fluctuations, seasonal demand, weather and political climate. Imperial’sconsiderations. While industry refining margins significantly impact earnings, strong operations performance, product mix optimization, and disciplined cost control are also critical to the company's strong financial performance. The company's integration across the value chain, from refining to marketing, enhances overall value across the fuels business.
Key events
Through 2021,Refining margins remained strong in 2023, driven by strong demand for petroleum products continuedgasoline and distillate due to recover, with the Downstream financial results benefiting from stronger margins.relatively low inventory levels, but short of 2022 levels on an annual basis. The company continues to closely monitor industry and global economic conditions, including recovery fromconditions.

In January 2023, the
COVID-19 company fully funded the Strathcona renewable diesel project, the largest such facility in Canada, located at Strathcona refinery. The facility will use low-carbon hydrogen, locally sourced and grown feedstocks and the company's own proprietary catalyst to produce more than one billion litres of renewable diesel annually, and could help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Facility construction commenced during the year, and the project remains on-plan with renewable diesel production expected to begin in 2025.
pandemic.
As described in more detail in Item"Item 1A. “Risk factors”Risk factors", proposed carbon policy and other climate related regulations, as well as continued biofuels mandates, could have negative impacts on the downstreamDownstream business.
ImperialThe company supplies petroleum products to the motoring public through Esso and Mobil-branded sites and independent marketers. At the end of 2021,2023, there were about 2,4002,500 sites operating under a branded wholesaler model, whereby Imperial supplies fuel to independent third parties who own and operate sites in alignment with Esso and Mobil brand standards.
standards, whereby the company supplies fuel to independent third parties.
Results of operations
20212023 Net income (loss) factor analysis
millions of Canadian dollars
94

Margins – HigherLower margins increased net income by about $600 million, reflecting improved product demand.
primarily reflect weaker market conditions.

Other – All other items decreased net incomeHigher turnaround impacts of about $340 million, associated with the planned turnaround activities at the Strathcona and Sarnia refineries, partially offset by $258 million, primarily driven by unfavourablefavourable foreign exchange impacts of about $150$210 million, and an unfavourable inventory adjustmentimproved volumes of $74about $50 million,
2
, partially offset by and lower operating expenses of about $50 million.
million, primarily due to lower energy prices.
257
In 2021, the company recorded an unfavourable $74 million ($82 million, before tax) inventory adjustment (including the proportionate share of LIFO changes) related to reconciliations of additives and products inventory at equity and third-party terminals. The out-of-period impact of $57 million ($63 million, before tax) occurred over a number of years, and has been resolved.

56

20202022 Net income (loss) factor analysis
millions of Canadian dollars
213
Margins – Results were negatively impacted by lowerHigher margins primarily reflect improved market conditions.

Other – Lower turnaround impacts of about $710 million.
Other – All other items increased net income$140 million, reflecting the absence of turnaround activities at Strathcona refinery, improved volumes of about $130 million, favourable foreign exchange impacts of about $120 million, and absence of the prior year unfavourable out-of-period inventory adjustment of $74 million, partially offset by $302 million, primarily driven by lowerhigher operating expenses of about $190 million, lowermillion.

Refinery utilization
thousands of barrels per day (a)2023 2022 2021 
Total refinery throughput (b)
407 418 379 
Rated capacity at December 31 (c)
433 433 428 
Utilization of total refinery capacity (percent)
94 98 89 
(a)Volume per day metrics are calculated by dividing the volume for the period by the number of calendar days in the period.
(b)Refinery throughput is the volume of crude oil and feedstocks that is processed in the refinery atmospheric distillation units.
(c)Refining capacity data is based on 100 percent of rated refinery process unit stream-day capacities to process inputs to atmospheric distillation units under normal operating conditions, less the impact of shutdowns for regular repair and maintenance activities, averaged over an extended period of time.
2023
Lower refinery throughput in 2023 reflects the impact of planned turnaround impacts of about $190 million primarily related to reduced turnaround activity in the current yearactivities at Strathcona and improved reliability of about $180 million primarily due to the absence of the Sarnia fractionation tower incident which occurred in April 2019. These items were partially offset by lower sales volumes of about $290 million.
refineries.
Refinery utilization
               
thousands of barrels per day (a)  
2021
   2020   2019 
Total refinery throughput
(b)
  
 
379
 
                 340                  353 
Rated capacity at December 31
(c)
  
 
428
 
   428    423 
Utilization of total refinery capacity
(percent)
  
 
89
 
   80    83 
(a)
Volume per day metrics are calculated by dividing the volume for the period by the number of calendar days in the period.
(b)
Refinery throughput is the volume of crude oil and feedstocks that is processed in the refinery atmospheric distillation units.
(c)
Rated capacities are based on definite specifications as to types of crude oil and feedstocks that are processed in the refinery atmospheric distillation units, the products to be obtained and the refinery process, adjusted to include an estimated allowance for normal maintenance shutdowns. Accordingly, actual capacities may be higher or lower than rated capacities due to changes in refinery operation and the type of crude oil available for processing.
2021
2022
Improved refinery throughput in 20212022 was primarily reflectsdriven by increased demand and reduced impacts associated with the
COVID-19
pandemic, partially offset by a planned turnaround at Strathcona.activity.

2020Petroleum product sales
thousands of barrels per day (a)2023 2022 2021 
Gasolines228 229 224 
Heating, diesel and jet fuels176 176 160 
Lube oils and other products43 47 45 
Heavy fuel oils24 23 27 
Net petroleum product sales471 475 456 
(a)Volume per day metrics are calculated by dividing the volume for the period by the number of calendar days in the period.

2023
Lower throughput waspetroleum product sales in 2023 were primarily driven by reduced demand due to the
COVID-19
pandemic, partially offset by lower refinery turnaround activity and reliability events, including impacts from the Sarnia fractionation tower incident which occurred in April 2019.wholesale customer volume.
Petroleum product sales
               
thousands of barrels per day (a)  
2021
   2020   2019 
Gasolines
  
 
224
 
                 215                  249 
Heating, diesel and jet fuels
  
 
160
 
   146    167 
Heavy fuel oils
  
 
27
 
   20    21 
Lube oils and other products
  
 
45
 
   40    38 
Net petroleum product sales
  
 
456
 
   421    475 
(a) Volume per day metrics are calculated by dividing the volume for the period by the number of calendar days in the period.
  
2021
2022
Improved petroleum product sales in 20212022 primarily reflects reduced impacts associated with theincreased demand.
COVID-19
pandemic.



2020
Lower petroleum product sales were primarily driven by reduced demand due to the
COVID-19
pandemic.
57
58

Table of Contents
Chemical
Overview
North America continued to benefit from abundant supplies of natural gas and gas liquids, providing both low cost energy and feedstock for steam crackers.
Key events
In 2021, results benefited from robust industry demand and strong reliability.
2023, margins were adversely impacted by increased supply of polyethylene. Sales volumes decreased primarily due to planned maintenance activities.
ImperialThe company maintains a competitive advantage through continued operational excellence, consistent product quality, investment and cost discipline, and integration of its chemical plant in Sarnia with the refinery. The company also benefits from its relationship with ExxonMobil’s North American chemical businesses, enabling Imperial to maintain a leadership position in its key market segments.
Results of operations
20212023 Net income (loss) factor analysis
millions of Canadian dollars
760

2022 Net income (loss) factor analysis
millions of Canadian dollars
836
Margins – ImprovedLower margins increased net income by about $250 million, primarily due to strongerreflect weaker industry polyethylene margins.

Sales

thousands of tonnes2023 2022 2021 
Total petrochemical sales820 842 831 
2020 Net income (loss) factor analysis
millions of Canadian dollars
Margins – Lower earnings primarily reflect lower margins.
Sales
               
    
thousands of tonnes  
2021
   2020   2019 
Polymers and basic chemicals
  
 
599
 
                 574                  575 
Intermediate and others
  
 
232
 
   175    157 
Total petrochemical sales
  
 
831
 
   749    732 
Corporate and other

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Net income (loss)(88)(131)(172)
millions of Canadian dollars  
2021
  2020  2019 
Net income (loss)
  
 
(172
            (170            (217
58
59

Table of Contents
Liquidity and capital resources
Sources and uses of cash
The company issues long-term debt from time to time and maintains a commercial paper program. However, internally generated funds cover the majority of its financial requirements. Cash that may be temporarily surplus to the company’s immediate needs is carefully managed through counterparty quality and investment guidelines to ensure that it is secure and readily available to meet the company’s cash requirements and to optimize returns.
Cash flows from operating activities are highly dependent on crude oil and natural gas prices, as well as petroleum and chemical product margins. In addition, to provide for cash flow in future periods, the company needs to continually find and develop new resources, and continue to develop and apply new technologies to existing fields in order to maintain or increase production.
The company’s financial strength enables it to make large, long-term capital expenditures. Imperial’sThe company’s portfolio of development opportunities and the complementary nature of its business segments help mitigate the overall risks for the company and its cash flows. Further, due to its financial strength, debt capacity and portfolio of opportunities, the risk associated with delay of any single project would not have a significant impact on the company’s liquidity or ability to generate sufficient cash flows for its operations and fixed commitments.
Funding of registered retirement plans complies with federal and provincial pension regulations, and the company makes contributions to the plans based on an independent actuarial valuation completed at least once every three years depending on funding status. The most recent valuation of the company’s registered retirement plans was completed as at December 31, 2019.2022. The company contributed $164$148 million to the registered retirement plans in 2021.2023. Future funding requirements are not expected to affect the company’s existing capital investment plans or its ability to pursue new investment opportunities.

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Cash flows from (used in):   
Operating activities3,734 10,482 5,476 
Investing activities(1,694)(618)(1,012)
Financing activities(4,925)(8,268)(3,082)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(2,885)1,596 1,382 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year864 3,749 2,153 
millions of Canadian dollars  
2021
          2020          2019 
Cash provided by (used in)
             
Operating activities
  
 
5,476
 
  798   4,429 
Investing activities
  
 
(1,012
  (802  (1,704
Financing activities
  
 
(3,082
  (943  (1,995
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  
 
1,382
 
  (947  730 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  
 
2,153
 
  771   1,718 
Cash flowflows from operating activities
2023
2021
Cash flows from operating activities primarily reflect unfavourable working capital impacts, including an income tax catch-up payment of $2.1 billion, as well as lower Upstream realizations and Downstream margins.
2022
Cash flow generated from operating activities primarily reflects higher Upstream realizations, improved Downstream margins, and stronger Downstream margins.
2020
Cash flow generated from operating activities primarily reflects lower realizations in the Upstream and unfavourablefavourable working capital impacts.
Cash flow fromflows used in investing activities
2021
Investing activities used net cash of $1,012 million in 2021, up from $802 million2023
Cash flows
used in 2020,investing activities primarily reflectingreflect the absence of proceeds from the sale of interests in XTO Energy Canada, and higher additions to property, plant and equipment.
2022
2020
Investing activities used net cash of $802 million in 2020, compared to $1,704 millionCash flow used in 2019,investing activities primarily reflecting lowerreflects higher additions to property, plant and equipment.
equipment, which were partially offset by proceeds from the sale of interests in XTO Energy Canada.

59


60

Cash flow fromflows used in financing activities
2021
2023
At the end of 2021,2023, total debt outstanding was $5,176$4,132 million, compared with $5,184$4,155 million at the end of 2020.2022.

During the fourth quarter of 2023, the company extended the maturity dates of its two existing $250 million committed lines of credit to November 2024 and November 2025, respectively.

The company has not drawn on any of its outstanding $500 million of available credit facilities.
2022
At the end of 2022, total debt outstanding was $4,155 million, compared with $5,176 million at the end of 2021.

During the third quarter of 2022, the company decreased its long-term debt by $1 billion by partially repaying an existing facility with an affiliated company of ExxonMobil.
During the second quarter of 2021,2022, the company reduced its existing $500 million committed long-term line of credit to $250 million and extended the maturity date to June 30, 2023. Subsequently in the fourth quarter of two of its short-term lines2022, this committed long-term line of credit totalling $750 million, to May 2023, these facilities are now long-term.was cancelled in full. The company also extended one of its $300$250 million committed short-term linelong-term lines of credit to June 2022.30, 2024.
In November 2021,2022, the company extended the maturity date of an existing $250 million committed short-term line of credit to November 2022.
2023.
The company has not drawn on these facilities.
2020
At the endany of 2020, total debtits outstanding was $5,184 million, compared with $5,190 million at the end of 2019.
In response to market conditions, during the second quarter of 2020, the company entered into a $500 million committed short-term line of available credit to May 2021, and a $300 million committed short-term line of credit to June 2021. These facilities were in addition to existing credit facilities of $500 million. The company has not drawn on these facilities.
In November 2020, the company extended the maturity date of one of its existing $250 million committed short-term line of credit to November 2021. The company has not drawn on the facility.

The maturity date of the other existing $250 million credit facility remains unchanged at November 2021. The company has not drawn on the facility.
Share repurchases
                  
    
millions of Canadian dollars, unless noted    
2021
     2020     2019 
Share repurchases
    
 
2,245
 
     274      1,373 
Number of shares purchased
(millions) (a)
    
 
56.0
 
     9.8      38.7 
(a) Share repurchases were made under the company’s normal course issuer bid program, and include shares purchased from Exxon Mobil Corporation concurrent with, but outside of the normal course issuer bid.
2021

On April 30, 2021, the company announced an amendment to its normal course issuer bid to increase the number of common shares that were available to be purchased. Under the amendment, the number of common shares available for purchase increased to a maximum of 29,363,070 common shares during the period June 29, 2020 to June 28, 2021. In 2021, the company purchased 29,356,095 shares under this amended program.
millions of Canadian dollars, unless noted2023 2022 2021 
Share repurchases (a)
3,800 6,395 2,245 
Number of shares purchased (millions) (a)
48.3 93.9 56.0 
(a)Share repurchases were made under the company's normal course issuer bid program for the periods disclosed. Substantial issuer bids were undertaken and commenced on May 6, 2022 (expired on June 10, 2022), November 4, 2022 (expired on December 9, 2022), and November 3, 2023 (expired on December 8, 2023). Includes shares purchased from Exxon Mobil Corporation concurrent with, but outside of, the normal course issuer bid, and by way of a proportionate tender under the company's substantial issuer bids.
2023
On June 23, 202127, 2023, the company announced that it had received final approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange for a new normal course issuer bid and willto continue its then existing share purchase program. The program enablesenabled the company to purchase up to a maximum of 35,583,67129,207,635 common shares during the period June 29, 20212023 to June 28, 2022.
2024. The program completed on October 19, 2023 as a result of the company purchasing the maximum allowable number of shares under the program.

In accordanceOn November 3, 2023, the company commenced a substantial issuer bid pursuant to which it offered to purchase for cancellation up to $1.5 billion of its common shares through a modified Dutch auction and proportionate tender offer. The substantial issuer bid was completed on December 13, 2023, with the company’s announcement in November 2021company taking up and paying for 19,108,280common shares at a price of $78.50 per share, for an aggregate purchase of $1.5 billion and3.4 percent of Imperial's issued and outstanding shares at the close of business onOctober 30, 2023.This included 13,299,349shares purchased from Exxon Mobil Corporation by way of a proportionate tender to maintain its ownership percentage at approximately 69.6 percent.
2022
On June 27, 2022, the company announced that it intended to accelerate purchases underhad received final approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange for a new normal course issuer bid,bid. The program enabled the company to purchase up to a maximum of 31,833,809 common shares during the period June 29, 2022 to June 28, 2023. The program was subsequently completed on January 31,October 21, 2022 as a result of the company purchasing the maximum allowable number of shares under the program.

2020
In response to market conditions, substantial purchases under the share purchase program were suspended on April 1, 2020.
60

Dividends
                  
millions of Canadian dollars, unless noted    
2021
     2020     2019 
Dividends paid
    
 
706
 
     649      631 
Per share dividend paid
(dollars)
    
 
0.98
 
     0.88      0.82 

61

On May 6, 2022, the company commenced a substantial issuer bid pursuant to which it offered to purchase for cancellation up to $2.5 billion of its common shares through a modified Dutch auction and proportionate tender offer. The substantial issuer bid was completed on June 15, 2022, with the company taking up and paying for 32,467,532 common shares at a price of $77.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase of $2.5 billion and 4.9 percent of Imperial’s issued and outstanding shares at the close of business on May 2, 2022. This included 22,597,379 shares purchased from Exxon Mobil Corporation by way of a proportionate tender to maintain its ownership percentage at approximately 69.6 percent.

On November 4, 2022, the company commenced a substantial issuer bid pursuant to which it offered to purchase for cancellation up to $1.5 billion of its common shares through a modified Dutch auction and proportionate tender offer. The substantial issuer bid was completed on December 14, 2022, with the company taking up and paying for 20,689,655 common shares at a price of $72.50 per share, for an aggregate purchase of $1.5 billion and 3.4 percent of Imperial's issued and outstanding shares at the close of business on October 31, 2022. This included 14,399,985 shares purchased from Exxon Mobil Corporation by way of a proportionate tender to maintain its ownership percentage at approximately 69.6 percent.

Dividends

millions of Canadian dollars, unless noted2023 2022 2021 
Dividends paid1,103 851 706 
Per share dividend paid (dollars)
1.88 1.29 0.98 
Financial strength
The table below shows Imperial’sthe company’s consolidated
debt-to-capital
ratio. The data demonstrates the company’s creditworthiness:
 percent            
 At December 31  
2021
           2020           2019 
Debt to capital
(a)
  
 
19
 
   19    18 
(a)
Debt, defined as the sum of “Notes and loans payable” and “Long-term debt” (page 77), divided by capital, defined as the sum of debt and “Total shareholders’ equity” (page 77).

percent
At December 312023 2022 2021 
Debt to capital (a)
16 16 19 
(a)Debt, defined as the sum of “Notes and loans payable” and “Long-term debt” on the Consolidated balance sheet, divided by capital, defined as the sum of debt and “Total shareholders’ equity” on the Consolidated balance sheet.
Debt-related interest incurred in 2021,2023, before capitalization of interest, was $63$203 million, compared with $102up from $111 million in 2020.2022. The average effectiveweighted-average interest rate on the company’s debt was 1.24.9 percent in 2021, compared with 2.02023, up from 2.2 percent in 2020.2022.
The company’s financial strength represents a competitive advantage of strategic importance providing it the opportunity to readily access capital markets across a range of market conditions and enables the company to take on large, long-term capital commitments in the pursuit of maximizing shareholder value.
Contractual obligations
The company has contractual obligations involving commitments to third parties that impact its liquidity and capital resource needs. These contractual obligations are primarily for leases, debt, asset retirement obligations, pension and other postretirement benefits, other long-term obligations, and firm capital commitments. Further information on this topic can be found in notes 4, 5, 13 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements.

Other long-term purchase agreements are commitments that are
non-cancelable,
non-cancellable, or cancelablecancellable only under certain conditions, as well as long-term commitments, other than unconditional purchase obligations. They include primarily transportation services agreements, raw material supply and community benefits agreements. The total obligation at
year-end
2021 2023 was $8.7$11.8 billion, of which $697$728 million is due in 2022,2024, and $746$1,131 million is due in 2023. At March 31, 2021, due to the termination of transportation services agreements related to a third-party pipeline project, other long-term purchase agreements decreased by approximately $2.9 billion. The majority of these commitments related to years 2026 and beyond.2025.

61
62

Litigation and other contingencies
As discusseddiscussed in note 9 to thethe consolidated financial statements, on page 98, a variety of claims have been made against Imperial and its subsidiaries. Based on a consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances, the company does not believe the ultimate outcome of any currently pending lawsuits against the company will have a material adverse effect on the company’s operations, financial condition, or financial statements taken as a whole.
Additionally, as discussed in note 9, Imperial was contingently liable at December 31, 2021,2023, for guarantees relating to performance under contracts. These guarantees do not have a material effect on the company’s operations, financial condition, or financial statements taken as a whole.
There are no events or uncertainties beyond those already included in reported financial information that would indicate a material change in future operating results or financial condition.
Capital and exploration expenditures
Capital and exploration expenditures represent the combined total of additions at cost to property, plant and equipment, additions to finance leases, additional investments and acquisitions; exploration expenses on a
before-tax
basis from the Consolidated statement of income; and the company’s share of similar costs for equity companies. Capital and exploration expenditures exclude the purchase of carbon emission credits. While Imperial’sthe company’s management is responsible for all investments and elements of net income, particular focus is placed on managing the controllable aspects of this group of expenditures.

 millions of Canadian dollars  
          2021
             2020 
Upstream
(a)
  
 
632
 
   561 
Downstream
  
 
476
 
   251 
Chemical
  
 
8
 
   21 
Corporate and other
  
 
24
 
   41 
Total
  
 
1,140
 
   874 
(a)
Exploration expenses included.
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 
Upstream (a)
1,108 1,128 
Downstream472 295 
Chemical23 10 
Corporate and other175 57 
Total1,778 1,490 
(a)Exploration expenses included.
For the Upstream segment, capital and exploration expenditures were primarily related to sustaining activity in support of the company’s
in-situ
and oil sands and in-situ assets.
For the Downstream segment, capital expenditures were primarily for enhancingprogressing the company’s distribution networkStrathcona renewable diesel facility as well as other refinery and distribution projects to improve environmental performance, reliability, feedstock flexibility,and energy efficiency and environmental performance.efficiency.
Total capital and exploration expenditures are expected to be approximately $1.4$1.7 billion in 2022.2024.
Expected capital and exploration expenditures for 20222024 includes firm capital commitments of $290$686 million for the construction and purchase of fixed assets and other permanent investments. An additional $354$65 million of firm capital commitments have been made for years 20232025 and beyond.
Actual spending could vary depending on the progress of individual projects.

62
63

Table of Contents
Market risks
Crude oil, natural gas, petroleum product and chemical prices have fluctuated in response to changing market forces. The impacts of these price fluctuations on earnings from Upstream, Downstream and Chemical operations have varied.
Imperial’sThe company’s earnings are influenced by North American crude oil benchmark prices as well as changes in the differentials between these benchmarks and western Canadian prices for light and heavy crude oil. Imperial’sThe company’s integrated business model reduces the company’sits risk from changes in commodity prices. For instance, when light and heavy differentials between North American crude benchmarks and western Canadian prices widen, together, Imperialthe company is able to mitigate the impact of widening differentials on the Upstream through integration with Downstream investments in refineries, pipeline commitments and the Edmonton rail terminal. As an example, the negative impact of a widening differential in the Upstream is more than offset by the benefit of lower feedstock costs in the Downstream.
At this time, Imperial is a net consumer of natural gas, used in Imperial’s Upstream operation and refineries. A decrease in the value of natural gas reduces Imperial’s operating expenses, thereby increasing Imperial’s earnings.
In the competitive downstream and chemical environments, earnings are primarily determined by margin capture rather than absolute price levels on products sold. Refining margins are a function of the difference between what a refiner pays for its raw materials (primarily crude oil) and the market prices for the range of products produced. These prices, in turn, depend on global and regional supply / demand balances, inventory levels, refinery operations, import / export balances and weather.
Industry crude oil and natural gas commodity prices and petroleum and chemical product prices are commonly benchmarked in U.S. dollars. The majority of Imperial’sthe company’s sales and purchases are related to these industry U.S. dollar benchmarks. As the company records and reports its financial results in Canadian dollars, to the extent that the Canadian / U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuates, the company’s earnings will be affected.
ImperialThe company is exposed to changes in interest rates, primarily on its debt which carries floating interest rates. The impact of a quarter percent change in interest rates affecting Imperial’sthe company’s debt would not be material to earnings or cash flow. ImperialThe company has access to significant sources of long-term and short-term liquidity. Internally generated funds are expected to cover the majority of financial requirements, supplemented by long-term and short-term debt as needed.
The company’s potential exposure to commodity price and margin, and Canadian / U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations is summarized in the earnings sensitivities table, which shows the estimated annual effect, under current conditions, on the company’s
after-tax
net income. For any given period, the extent of actual benefit or detriment will be dependent on the price movements of individual types of crude oil and products, production and sales volumes, transportation capacity, costs and egress methods, and other factors. Accordingly, changes in benchmark prices for crude oil and crude oil differentials, and other factors listed in the table following, only provide broad indicators of changes in the earnings experienced in any particular period.
63


Earnings sensitivities
(a)
(a)
millions of Canadian dollars,
after-tax
One dollar (U.S.) per barrel increase (decrease) in crude oil prices
+ (-)105
100
One dollar (U.S.) per barrel increase (decrease) in light and heavy crude price differentials
(b)
+ (-)
30
Ten cents per thousand cubic feet decrease (increase) in natural gas prices
+ (-)
8
One dollar (U.S.) per barrel increase (decrease) in refining
2-1-1
margins
(c)
(b)
+ (-)140
              140
One cent (U.S.) per pound increase (decrease) in sales margins for polyethylene
+ (-)
7
One cent decrease (increase) in the value of the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar
+ (-)170
120
(a)
Each sensitivity calculation shows the annual impact on net income resulting from a change in one factor, after tax and royalties, and holding all other factors constant. These sensitivities have been updated to reflect current market conditions. They may not apply proportionately to larger fluctuations.
(b)
Light and heavy crude differentials represent the difference between WTI benchmark prices and western Canadian prices for light and heavy crudes.
(c)
The
2-1-1
crack spread is an indicator of the refining margin generated by converting two barrels of crude oil into one barrel of gasoline and one barrel of diesel.
The demand for crude oil, natural gas, petroleum products and petrochemical products are generally linked closely with economic growth. The occurrence of recessions or other periods of low or negative economic growth such as impacts due to the
COVID-19
pandemic, will typically have a direct adverse impact on the company’s financial results. Although price levels of crude oil and natural gas may rise and fall significantly over the short to medium-term due to global economic conditions, political events, decisions by OPEC, governments and other factors, industry economics over the long-term will continue to be driven by market supply and demand. Accordingly, theThe company evaluates the viability of its major investments over a range of prices.prices, including estimated greenhouse gas emission costs.

64

The global energy markets can give rise to extended periods in which market conditions are adverse to one or more of the company’s businesses. Such conditions, along with the capital-intensive nature of the industry and very long lead times associated with many of the company’s projects, underscore the importance of maintaining a strong financial position. Management views the company’s financial strength as a competitive advantage.
In general, segment results are not dependent on the ability to sell and / or purchase products to / from other segments. Where such intersegment sales take place, they are the result of efficiencies and competitive advantages from integrated business segments and refinery and chemical complexes. The company’s intersegment sales include crude oil produced by the Upstream and sold to the Downstream, as well as sales between refineries and the chemical plant related to raw materials, feedstocks and finished products. All intersegment sales are at market based prices. Refer to note 2 for additional information on intersegment revenue.
The company has an active asset management program in which underperformingnonstrategic assets are either improved to acceptable levels or considered for divestment. The asset management program includes a disciplined, regular review to ensure that assets are contributing to the company’s strategic objectives.
Risk management
The company’s size, strong capital structure and the complementary nature of the Upstream, Downstream and Chemical businesses reduceits business segments reduces the company’s enterprise-wide risk from changes in commodity prices and currency exchange rates. In addition, the company may use commodity-based contracts, including derivatives, to manage commodity price risk and to generate returns from trading. The company’s derivatives are not accounted for under hedge accounting. Credit risk associated with the company’s derivative position is mitigated by several factors, including the use of derivative clearing exchanges and the quality of and financial limits placed on derivative counterparties. No material market or credit risks to the company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity exist as a result of the derivatives described in notenote 6 on page 95.. The company maintains a system of controls that includes the authorization, reporting and monitoring of derivative activity.
64
65

Critical accounting estimates
The company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP). U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The company’s accounting and financial reporting fairly reflect its business model involving exploration for, and production of, crude oil and natural gas; manufacture, trade, transport and sale of crude oil, natural gas, petroleum products, petrochemicals and a variety of specialty products; and pursuit of lower-emission business opportunities, including carbon capture and storage, hydrogen and biofuels. Imperiallower-emission fuels. The company does not use financing structures for the purpose of altering accounting outcomes or removing debt from the balance sheet. The company’s significant accounting policies are summarized in note 1 to thethe consolidated financial statements on page 80.
statements.
Oil and natural gas reserves
Evaluations of oil and natural gas reserves are important to the effective management of upstream assets. They are an integral part of investment decisions about oil and gas properties such as whether development should proceed.
The estimation of proved reserve volumes, which is based on the requirement of reasonable certainty, is an ongoing process based on rigorous technical evaluations, commercial and market assessments, detailed analysis of well information such as flow rates and reservoir pressures, and development and production costs, and other factors. The estimation of proved reserves is controlled by the company through long-standing approval guidelines. Reserves changes are made within a well-established, disciplined process driven by qualified geoscience and engineering professionals, assisted by the reserves management group which has significant technical experience, culminating in reviews with and approval by senior management and the company’s board of directors. Notably, the company does not use specific quantitative reserves targets to determine compensation. Key features of the reserves estimation process are covered in “Disclosure"Disclosure of reserves”reserves" in Item 1.
Oil and natural gas reserves include both proved and unproved reserves.

Proved oil and natural gas reserves are determined in accordance with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requirements. Proved reserves are those quantities of oil and natural gas which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible under existing economic and operating conditions and government regulations. Proved reserves are determined using the average of first-day-of-the-month oil and natural gas prices during the reporting year.
Proved oil and natural gas reserves are determined in accordance with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requirements. Proved reserves are those quantities of oil and natural gas which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible under existing economic and operating conditions and government regulations. Proved reserves are determined using the average of
first-day-of-the-month
oil and natural gas prices during the reporting year.
Proved reserves can be further subdivided into developed and undeveloped reserves. Proved developed reserves include amounts which are expected to be recovered through existing wells, and facilities, or mining activities with existing equipment and operating methods. Proved undeveloped reserves include amounts expected to be recovered from new wells, on undrilled proved acreageexisting wells, facilities, or from existing wellsmining activities, where a relatively major capital expenditure is required for completion.required. Proved undeveloped reserves are recognized only ifwhen a development plan has been adopted indicating that the reserves are scheduled to be drilleddeveloped within five years, unless specific circumstances support a longer period of time.
The company is reasonably certain that proved reserves will be produced. However, the timing and amount recovered can be affected by a number of factors including completion and optimization of development projects, reservoir performance, regulatory approvals, government policies, consumer preferences, royalty frameworks and significant changes in oil and natural gas price levels.

Unproved reserves are quantities of oil and natural gas with less than reasonable certainty of recoverability and include probable reserves. Probable reserves are reserves that, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.
Unproved reserves are quantities of oil and natural gas with less than reasonable certainty of recoverability and include probable reserves. Probable reserves are reserves that, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.
Revisions in previously estimated volumes of proved reserves for existing fields can occur due to the evaluation or
re-evaluation
of already available geologic, reservoir or production data; new geologic, reservoir or production data; or changes in the average of
first-day-of-the-month
oil and natural gas prices and / or costs that are used in the estimation of reserves. Revisions can also result from significant changes in either development strategy or production equipment /and facility capacity.
6566


In 2019, downward revisions to proved bitumen reserves were driven by technical and development plan updates at Kearl, resulting in a decrease of 0.2 billion barrels, partially offset by an increase of 0.1 billion barrels at Cold Lake associated with an end of field life change driven by pricing. Downward revisions to proved synthetic oil reserves were a result of higher royalty obligations at Syncrude driven by pricing. Changes to liquids and natural gas proved reserves were the result of updated development plans at the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets and the divestment of conventional properties.
In 2020, downward revisions of proved bitumen reserves were a result of low prices. The 2.2 billion barrels of bitumen at Kearl and 0.6 billion barrels of bitumen at Cold Lake no longer qualified as proved reserves under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission definition of proved reserves. Downward revisions to proved synthetic oil reserves were a result of lower prices, offset by the addition of proved undeveloped reserves associated with future development at Syncrude. Changes to the liquids and natural gas proved reserves were the result of updated development plans at the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets and the divestment of conventional properties.
In 2021, upward revisions of proved bitumen reserves were a result of improved prices. The 1.7 billion barrels of bitumen at Kearl and 0.5 billion barrels of bitumen at Cold Lake qualified as proved reserves under the U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC definition of proved reserves. Upward revisions to proved synthetic crude oil reserves were a result of improved prices. Changes to the liquids and natural gas proved reserves were the result of updated development plans and divestments at the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets.
In 2022, downward revisions of proved bitumen reserves were driven by a decrease of 0.2 billion barrels at Kearl as a result of higher royalty obligations associated with pricing, and a decrease of 0.2 billion barrels at Cold Lake due to an updated development plan. An increase to the bitumen reserves of 0.1 billion barrels is associated with extensions at Cold Lake for the Grand Rapids Phase 1 SA-SAGD and Leming SAGD projects. Downward revisions to proved synthetic crude oil reserves were a result of mine development plan updates and higher royalty obligations at Syncrude associated with pricing. Changes to the liquids and natural gas proved reserves were primarily a result of the sale of the company’s interest in the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets.
In 2023, upward revisions of proved bitumen of 0.1 billion barrels were driven by lower royalty obligations associated with lower pricing and minor technical revisions at Cold Lake and Kearl. A slight increase in proved reserves for synthetic crude oil is associated with lower royalty obligations associated with pricing. Conventional proved liquids reserves decreased to zero under existing pricing and operating conditions.
Under the terms of certain contractual arrangements or government royalty regimes, lower prices can also increase proved reserves attributable to Imperial.the company. The company’s operating decisions and its outlook for future production volumes are not impacted by proved reserves as disclosed under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)SEC definition.
Unit-of-production
depreciation
Oil and natural gas reserve volumes are used as the basis to calculate
unit-of-production
depreciation rates for most upstream assets. Depreciation is calculated by taking the ratio of asset cost to total proved reserves or proved developed reserves applied to actual production. The volumes produced and asset cost are known, while proved reserves are based on estimates that are subject to some variability.
In the event that the
unit-of-production
method does not result in an equitable allocation of cost over the economic life of an upstream asset, an alternative method is used. The straight-line method is used in limited situations where the expected life of the asset does not reasonably correlate with that of the underlying reserves. For example, certain assets used in the production of oil and natural gas have a shorter life than the reserves, and as such, the company uses straight-line depreciation to ensure the asset is fully depreciated by the end of its useful life.
To the extent that proved reserves for a property are substantially
de-booked
and that property continues to produce such that the resulting depreciation charge does not result in an equitable allocation of cost over the expected life, assets will be depreciated using a
unit-of-production
method based on reserves determined at the most recent SEC price which results in a more meaningful quantity of proved reserves, appropriately adjusted for production and technical changes. This approach was applied in 2021, with the corresponding effect on depreciation expense being immaterial compared to prior periods. For 2022, all properties have sufficient reserves at current SEC prices which will enable equitable allocation of cost over the economic lives of the Upstream assets.
66


Impact of oil and gas reserves and prices and margins on testing for impairment
The company tests assets or groups of assets for recoverability on an ongoing basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The company has a robust process to monitor for indicators of potential impairment across its asset groups throughout the year. This process is aligned with the requirements of
ASC 360
and
ASC 932
and relies, in part, on the company’s planning and budgeting cycle.
Because the lifespans of the vast majority of the company’s major assets are measured in decades, the future cash flows of these assets are predominantly based on long-term oil and natural gas commodity prices, industry margins, and development and production costs. Significant reductions in the company’s view of oil or natural gas commodity prices or margin ranges, especially the longer-term prices and margins, and changes in the development plans, including decisions to defer, reduce or eliminate planned capital spending, can be an indicator of potential impairment. Other events or changes in circumstances, including indicators outlined in
ASC 360
can be indicators of potential impairment as well.

67

In general, Imperialthe company does not view temporarily low prices or margins as an indication of impairment. Management believes that prices over the long term must be sufficient to generate investments in energy supply to meet global demand. Although prices will occasionally drop significantly, industry prices over the long term will continue to be driven by market supply and demand fundamentals. On the supply side, industry production from mature fields is declining. This is being offset by investments to generate production from new discoveries, field developments, and technology and efficiency advancements. OPECOPEC+ investment activities and production policies also have an impact on world oil supplies. The demand side is largely a function of general economic activities, alternative energy sources and levels of prosperity. During the lifespan of its major assets, the company expects that oil and gas prices and industry margins will experience significant volatility, and consequently,volatility. Consequently, these assets will experience periods of higher earnings and periods of lower earnings, or even losses. In assessing whether events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable, the company considers recent periods of operating losses in the context of its longer-term view of prices and margins.
EnergyGlobal Outlook and cash flow assessment
The annual planning and budgeting process, known as the company plan, is the mechanism by which resources (capital, operating expenses and people) are allocated across the company. The foundation for the energy supply and demand assumptions supporting the company plan begins with Exxon Mobil Corporation’s
Corporation's Global Outlook for Energy
(the
(the Outlook), which contains demand and supply projections based on its assessment of current trends in technology, government policies, consumer preferences, geopolitics, economic development, and economic development.other factors.
Reflective of the existing global policy environment, the Outlook does not attempt to project the degree of required future policy and technology advancement and deployment for the world or the company, to meet net-zeronet zero by 2050. As future policies and technology advancements emerge, they will be incorporated into the Outlook, and consequently, the company’s business plans will be updated accordingly.
67

If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable, the company estimates the future undiscounted cash flows of the affected properties to judge the recoverability of carrying amounts. In performing this assessment, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets. Cash flows used in recoverability assessments are based on the assumptions developed in the company plan, which is reviewed and approved by the board of directors, and are consistent with the criteria management uses to evaluate investment opportunities. These evaluations make use of the company’s assumptions of future capital allocations, crude oil and natural gas commodity prices including price differentials, refining and chemical margins, volumes, development and operating costs, including greenhouse gas emissions prices, and foreign currency exchange rates. Volumes are based on projected field and facility production profiles, throughput, or sales. Management’s estimate of upstream production volumes used for projected cash flows makes use of proved reserve quantities and may include risk-adjusted unproved reserve quantities. The greenhouse gas emission prices reflect existing or anticipated policy actions of applicable provincial and federal governments. While third-party scenarios such as the
International Energy Agency Net Zero Emissions by 2050
, may be used to test the resiliency of company’s businesses or strategies, they are not used as a basis for developing future cash flows for impairment assessments.
Fair value of impaired assets
An asset group is impaired if its estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the asset group’s carrying value. Impairments are measured by the amount by whichexcess of the carrying value exceedsover fair value. The assessment of fair value is based on the views of a likely market participant. The principal parameters used to establish fair value include estimates of acreage values and flowing production metrics from comparable market transactions, market-based estimates of historical cash flow multiples, and discounted cash flows. Inputs and assumptions used in discounted cash flow models include estimates of future production volumes, throughput and product sales volumes, commodity prices which(which are consistent with the average of third-party industry experts and government agencies,agencies), refining and chemical margins, drilling and development costs, operating costs, and discount rates which are reflective of the characteristics of the asset group.
Other impairment estimates
Unproved properties are assessed periodically to determine whether they have been impaired. Significant unproved properties are assessed for impairment individually, and valuation allowances against the capitalized costs are recorded based on the company’s future development plans, the estimated economic chance of success and the length of time that the company expects to hold the properties. Properties that are not individually significant are aggregated by groups and amortized based on development risk and average holding period.
68

Long-lived assets that are held for sale are evaluated for possible impairment by comparing the carrying value of the asset with its fair value less the cost to sell. If the net book value exceeds the fair value less cost to sell, the assets are considered impaired and adjusted to the lower value. Judgment is required to determine if assets are held for sale, and to determine the fair value less cost to sell.
Investments inaccounted for by the equity companiesmethod are assessed for possible impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an investment may not be recoverable. Examples of key indicators include a history of operating losses, negative earnings and cash flow outlook, significant downward revisions to oil and gas reserves, and the financial condition and prospects for the investee’s business segment or geographic region. If the decline in value of the investment is other than temporary, the carrying value of the investment is written down to fair value. In the absence of market prices for the investment, discounted cash flows are used to assess fair value, which requires significant judgment.
Gains on sales of proved and unproved properties are only recognized when there is neither uncertainty about the recovery of costs applicable to any interest retained nor any substantial obligation for future performance by the company. Losses on properties sold are recognized when incurred or when the properties are held for sale and the fair value of the properties is less than the carrying value.
68

Recent impairments
In 2020, the company announced its decision to not further develop a significant portion of its unconventional portfolio in Alberta, resulting in a
non-cash,
after-tax
impairment charge of $1,171 million in the company’s 2020 Upstream results.
Factors which could put further assets at risk of impairment in the future include reductions in the company’s price or margin outlooks, changes in the allocation of capital or development plans, reduced long-term demand for the company’s products and operating cost increases which exceed the pace of efficiencies or the pace of oil and natural gas price increases.increases or margins. However, due to the inherent difficulty in predicting future commodity prices or margins, and the relationship between industry prices and costs, it is not practicable to reasonably estimate the existence or range of any potential future impairment charges related to the company’s long-lived assets.
Supplemental information regarding oil and gas results of operations, capitalized costs and reserves is provided following the notes to consolidated financial statements.
Pension benefits
The company’s pension plan is managed in compliance with the requirements of governmental authorities and meets funding levels as determined by independent third-party actuaries. Pension accounting requires explicit assumptions regarding, among others, the discount rate for the benefit obligations, the expected rate of return on plan assets and the long-term rate of future compensation increases. All pension assumptions are reviewed annually by senior management. These assumptions are adjusted only as appropriate to reflect long-term changes in market rates and outlook. The long-term expected rate of return on plan assets of 4.54.8 percent used in 2021,2023 compares to actual returns of 8.55.7 percent and 7.36.1 percent achieved over the last
10-
and
20-year
periods respectively, ending December 31, 2021.2023. If different assumptions are used, the obligation and expense could increase or decrease as a result. As an indication of the company’s potential exposure to changes in the critical assumptions such as the expected rate of return on plan assets and the discount rate for measuring the pension plan benefits obligation, a reduction of 1 percent in the discount rate would increase the benefits obligation by approximately $1.8$1 billion. Similarly, a reduction of 1 percent in the long-term rate of return on plan assets would increase the annual pension expense by approximately $95$75 million before tax. At Imperial,the company, differences between actual returns on plan assets and the long-term expected returns are not recorded in pension expense in the year the differences occur. Such differences are deferred, along with other actuarial gains and losses, and are amortized into pension expense over the expected average remaining service life of employees. Employee benefits expense represented about 1 percent of total expenses in 2021.2023.
69

Asset retirement obligations
The company is subject to retirement obligations for certain assets. The fair values of these obligations are recorded as liabilities on a discounted basis, which is typically at the time the assets are installed. In the estimation of fair value, the company uses assumptions and judgments regarding such factors as the existence of a legal obligation for an asset retirement obligation; technical assessments of the assets; estimated amounts and timing of settlements; discount rates; and inflation rates. The obligations are initially measured at fair value and discounted to present value.
Over time, the discounted asset retirement obligation amount will be accreted for the change in its present value, with this effect included in production and manufacturing expenses. As payments to settle the obligations occur on an ongoing basis and will continue over the lives of the operating assets, which can exceed 25 years, the discount rate will be adjusted only as appropriate to reflect long-term changes in market rates and outlook. For 2021, the obligations were discounted at 6 percent and the accretion expense was $99 million, before tax, which was significantly less than 1 percent of total expenses in the year. There would be no material impact on the company’s reported financial results if a different discount rate had been used. On page 94, noteNote 5 to the consolidated financial statements provides a three yearthree-year continuity table detailing the changes in asset retirement obligations.
69

Suspended exploratory well costs
The company continues capitalization of exploratory well costs when it has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well and the company is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. Exploratory well costs not meeting these criteria are charged to expense. Assessing whether the company is making sufficient progress on a project requires careful consideration of the facts and circumstances. The facts and circumstances that support continued capitalization of suspended wells at
year-end
are disclosed in note 15 to the consolidated financial statements on page 104.statements.

Tax contingencies
The operations of the company are complex, and related tax interpretations, regulations and legislation are continually changing. Significant management judgment is required in the accounting for income tax contingencies and tax disputes because the outcomes are often difficult to predict.
The benefits of uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take in its income tax returns are recognized in the financial statements if management concludes that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained with the tax authorities. For a position that is likely to be sustained, the benefit recognized in the financial statements is measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized. Significant management judgment is required in the accounting for income tax contingencies and tax disputes because the outcomes are often difficult to predict. The company’s unrecognized tax benefits and a description of open tax years are summarized in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.

70

Table of Contents
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting
Management, including the company’s chief executive officer and principal accounting officer and principal financial officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the company’s financial reporting. Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that Imperial Oil Limited’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021.2023.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, audited the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021,2023, as stated in their report which is included herein.
/s/ Bradley W. Corson
/s/ B
radley
Bradley W. Corson

B.W. Corson
Chairman, president and chief executive officer
(Principal executive officer)
/s/ Daniel E. Lyons
Daniel E. Lyons
/s/ D
aniel
E. Lyons

D.E. Lyons
Senior vice-president,
finance and administration, and controller
(Principal accounting officer and principal financial officer)
February 23, 202228, 2024

71

Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Imperial Oil Limited
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Imperial Oil Limited and its subsidiaries (together, the Company) as of December 31, 20212023 and 2020,2022, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021,2023, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021,2023, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20212023 and 2020,2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20212023 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021,2023, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the COSO.

Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

72


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
The Impact of Proved Developed Oil and Natural Gas Reserves on Upstream Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
As described in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated upstream property, plant and equipment (PP&E), net balance was $27,811$26,840 million as of December 31, 2021,2023, and the related depreciation and depletion expense for the year ended December 31, 20212023 was $1,775$1,680 million. Management uses the successful efforts method to account for its exploration and production activities. Costs incurred to purchase, lease or otherwise acquire a property (whether unproved or proved) are capitalized when incurred. As disclosed by management, proved oil and natural gas reserve volumes are used as the basis to calculate
unit-of-production
depreciation rates for most upstream assets.
The estimation of proved oil and natural gas reserve volumes is an ongoing process based on technical evaluations, commercial and market assessments, detailed analysis of well information such as flow rates and reservoir pressures, and development and production costs, among other factors. As further disclosed by management, reserves changes are made within a well-established,well established, disciplined process driven by qualified geoscience and engineering professionals, assisted by the reserves management group (together, “management’s specialists”)management’s specialists).

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the impact of proved developed oil and natural gas reserves on upstream PP&E, net is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management, including the use of management’s specialists, when developing the estimates of proved developed oil and natural gas reserve volumes, which in turn led toand (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating the audit evidence related to the data, methods, and assumptions used by management and its specialists in developing the estimates of proved developed oil and natural gas reserve volumes and the assumptions related to development and production costs, as applicable.
volumes.












73


Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’smanagement's estimates of proved developed oil and natural gas reserve volumes. The work of management’smanagement's specialists was used in performing the procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of estimates ofthe proved developed oil and natural gas reserve volumes. As a basis for using this work, management’s specialists’management's specialists' qualifications were understood and the Company’sCompany's relationship with management’smanagement's specialists was assessed. The procedures performed, also included evaluation ofi) evaluating the methods and assumptions used by management’smanagement's specialists, tests of the data used by management’s specialists, and an evaluation of management’s specialists’ findings. These procedures also included, among others,ii) testing the completeness and accuracy of the data used by management's specialists related to future developmenthistorical production volumes, and production costs. Additionally, these procedures includediii) evaluating whether the assumptionsmanagement's specialists' findings related to developmentestimated future production volumes by comparing the estimate to relevant historical and production costs were reasonable considering the past performance of the Company and its business and strategic plan,current period information, as applicable.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Professional Accountants
Calgary, Canada
February 23, 202228, 2024
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 19341934.
74

Table of Contents
Consolidated statement of income (U.S. GAAP)

millions of Canadian dollars
For the years ended December 312023 2022 2021 
Revenues and other income   
Revenues (a)
50,702 59,413 37,508 
Investment and other income (note 8, 18)
267 257 82 
Total revenues and other income50,969 59,670 37,590 
 
Expenses   
Exploration (note 15)
5 32 
Purchases of crude oil and products (b)
32,399 37,742 23,174 
Production and manufacturing (c)
6,879 7,404 6,316 
Selling and general (c)
857 882 784 
Federal excise tax and fuel charge2,402 2,179 1,928 
Depreciation and depletion1,907 1,897 1,977 
Non-service pension and postretirement benefit82 17 42 
Financing (d) (note 12)
69 60 54 
Total expenses44,600 50,186 34,307 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes6,369 9,484 3,283 
 
Income taxes (note 3)
1,480 2,144 804 
 
Net income (loss)4,889 7,340 2,479 
 
Per share information (Canadian dollars)
   
Net income (loss) per common share - basic (note 10)
8.51 11.47 3.48 
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted (note 10)
8.49 11.44 3.48 
(a) Amounts from related parties included in revenues (note 16).13,544 17,0428,777
(b) Amounts to related parties included in purchases of crude oil and products
       (note 16).
4,125 3,7952,737
(c) Amounts to related parties included in production and manufacturing,
       and selling and general expenses (note 16).
473 460420
(d) Amounts to related parties included in financing (note 16).169 7828
The information in the notes to consolidated financial statements is an integral part of these statements.
75
millions of Canadian dollars           
For the years ended December 31
  
            2021
               2020              2019 
Revenues and other income
              
    
Revenues
(a)
  
 
37,508
 
   22,284    34,002 
Investment and other income
(note 8)
  
 
82
 
   104    99 
Total revenues and other income
  
 
37,590
 
   22,388    34,101 
    
Expenses
               
    
Exploration
(note 15)
  
 
32
 
   13    47 
Purchases of crude oil and products
(b)
  
 
23,174
 
   13,293    20,946 
Production and manufacturing
(c) (note 11)
  
 
6,316
 
   5,535    6,520 
Selling and general
(c)
  
 
784
 
   741    900 
Federal excise tax and fuel charge
  
��
1,928
 
   1,736    1,808 
Depreciation and depletion (includes impairments)
(note 2, 11)
  
 
1,977
 
   3,293    1,598 
Non-service
pension and postretirement benefit
  
 
42
 
   121    143 
Financing
(d) (note 12)
  
 
54
 
   64    93 
Total expenses
  
 
34,307
 
   24,796    32,055 
    
Income (loss) before income taxes
  
 
3,283
 
   (2,408   2,046 
    
Income taxes
(note 3)
  
 
804
 
   (551   (154
    
Net income (loss)
  
 
2,479
 
   (1,857   2,200 
    
Per share information
(Canadian dollars)
               
Net income (loss) per common share - basic
(note 10)
  
 
3.48
 
   (2.53   2.88 
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted
(note 10)
  
 
3.48
 
   (2.53   2.88 
(a)
  
Amounts from related parties included in revenues, (note 16).
  
 
8,777
 
   5,107    8,569 
(b)
  
Amounts to related parties included in purchases of crude oil and products, (note 16).
  
 
2,737
 
   2,484    3,305 
(c)
  Amounts to related parties included in production and manufacturing, and selling and general expenses, (note 16).  
 
420
 
   579    628 
(d)
  
Amounts to related parties included in financing, (note 16).
  
 
28
 
   61    98 

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income (U.S. GAAP)

millions of Canadian dollars
For the years ended December 312023 2022 2021 
Net income (loss)4,889 7,340 2,479 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes   
Postretirement benefits liability adjustment (excluding amortization)(206)582 679 
 
Amortization of postretirement benefits liability adjustment
       included in net benefit costs
41 83 133 
Total other comprehensive income (loss)(165)665 812 
  
Comprehensive income (loss)4,724 8,005 3,291 
The information in the notes to consolidated financial statements is an integral part of these statements.



76

Consolidated balance sheet (U.S. GAAP)

millions of Canadian dollars
At December 312023 2022 
Assets  
Current assets  
Cash and cash equivalents864 3,749 
Accounts receivable - net (a)
4,482 4,719 
Inventories of crude oil and products (note 11)
1,944 1,514 
Materials, supplies and prepaid expenses1,008 754 
Total current assets8,298 10,736 
Investments and long-term receivables (b)
1,062 893 
Property, plant and equipment,  
less accumulated depreciation and depletion (note 18)
30,835 30,506 
Goodwill166 166 
Other assets, including intangibles - net838 1,223 
Total assets41,199 43,524 
 
Liabilities  
Current liabilities  
Notes and loans payable (note 12)
121 122 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (a) (note 11)
6,231 6,194 
Income taxes payable251 2,582 
Total current liabilities6,603 8,898 
Long-term debt (c) (note 14)
4,011 4,033 
Other long-term obligations (note 5)
3,851 3,467 
Deferred income tax liabilities (note 3)
4,512 4,713 
Total liabilities18,977 21,111 
 
Commitments and contingent liabilities (note 9)
  
 
Shareholders’ equity  
Common shares at stated value (d) (note 10)
992 1,079 
Earnings reinvested21,907 21,846 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (note 17)
(677)(512)
Total shareholders’ equity22,222 22,413 
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity41,199 43,524 
(a) Accounts receivable - net included net amounts receivable from related parties (note 16).1,0481,108
(b) Investments and long-term receivables included amounts from related parties (note 16).283288
(c) Long-term debt included amounts to related parties (note 16).3,4473,447
(d) Number of common shares authorized (millions) (note 10).1,1001,100
Number of common shares outstanding (millions) (note 10).536584
The information in the notes to consolidated financial statements is an integral part of these statements.

Approved by the directors.

/s/ Bradley W. Corson/s/ Daniel E. Lyons
Bradley W. CorsonDaniel E. Lyons
Chairman, president andSenior vice-president
chief executive officerfinance and administration, and controller
77

Consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity (U.S. GAAP)

millions of Canadian dollars
At December 312023 2022 2021 
Common shares at stated value (note 10)
   
At beginning of year1,079 1,252 1,357 
Share purchases at stated value(87)(173)(105)
At end of year992 1,079 1,252 
 
Earnings reinvested   
At beginning of year21,846 21,660 22,050 
Net income (loss) for the year4,889 7,340 2,479 
Share purchases in excess of stated value(3,713)(6,222)(2,140)
Dividends declared(1,115)(932)(729)
At end of year21,907 21,846 21,660 
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (note 17)
   
At beginning of year(512)(1,177)(1,989)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(165)665 812 
At end of year(677)(512)(1,177)
 
Shareholders’ equity at end of year22,222 22,413 21,735 
The information in the notes to consolidated financial statements is an integral part of these statements.

78

Consolidated statement of cash flows (U.S. GAAP)

millions of Canadian dollars
For the years ended December 312023 2022 2021 
Operating activities   
Net income (loss)4,889 7,340 2,479 
Adjustments for non-cash items:   
Depreciation and depletion1,907 1,897 1,977 
(Gain) loss on asset sales (note 8, 18)
(73)(158)(49)
Deferred income taxes and other(85)(77)91 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:   
Accounts receivable237 (862)(1,950)
Inventories, materials, supplies and prepaid expenses(688)(477)45 
Income taxes payable(2,331)1,876 248 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities81 948 2,020 
All other items - net (b)
(203)(5)615 
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities3,734 10,482 5,476 
 
Investing activities   
Additions to property, plant and equipment(1,785)(1,526)(1,108)
Proceeds from asset sales (note 8, 18)
86 904 81 
Additional investments (6)— 
Loans to equity companies - net5 10 15 
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities(1,694)(618)(1,012)
 
Financing activities   
Short-term debt - net (note 12)
 — (111)
Long-term debt - reduction (note 14)
 (1,000)— 
Finance lease obligations - reduction (note 14)
(22)(22)(20)
Dividends paid(1,103)(851)(706)
Common shares purchased (note 10)
(3,800)(6,395)(2,245)
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities(4,925)(8,268)(3,082)
 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(2,885)1,596 1,382 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year3,749 2,153 771 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year (a)
864 3,749 2,153 
(a)  Cash is composed of cash in bank and cash equivalents at cost. Cash equivalents are all highly liquid securities with maturity of
       three months or less.
(b)  Included contributions to registered pension plans.(148)(174)(164)
 
Income taxes (paid) refunded.(4,153)(374)58 
Interest (paid), net of capitalization.(69)(60)(43)
The information in the notes to consolidated financial statements is an integral part of these statements.
7
5

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income (U.S. GAAP)
millions of Canadian dollars           
For the years ended December 31
  
        2021
           2020          2019 
Net income (loss)
  
 
2,479
 
   (1,857  2,200 
    
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes
              
Postretirement benefits liability adjustment (excluding amortization)
  
 
679
 
   (212  (505
    
Amortization of postretirement benefits liability adjustment included in net periodic benefit costs
  
 
133
 
   134   111 
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
  
 
812
 
   (78  (394
    
              
Comprehensive income (loss)
  
 
3,291
 
   (1,935  1,806 

The information in the notes to consolidated financial statements is an integral part of these statements.


76

Consolidated balance sheet (U.S. GAAP)
millions of Canadian dollars       
At December 31  
            2021
              2020 
Assets
         
Current assets
         
Cash
  
 
2,153
 
  771 
Accounts receivable - net
(a)
  
 
3,869
 
  1,919 
Inventories of crude oil and products
(note 11)
  
 
1,102
 
  1,161 
Materials, supplies and prepaid expenses
  
 
689
 
  673 
Total current assets
  
 
7,813
 
  4,524 
Investments and long-term receivables
(b)
  
 
757
 
  781 
Property, plant and equipment,
         
less accumulated depreciation and depletion
  
 
31,240
 
  32,034 
Goodwill
(note 11)
  
 
166
 
  166 
Other assets, including intangibles - net
  
 
806
 
  526 
Total assets
  
 
40,782
 
  38,031 
   
Liabilities
         
Current liabilities
         
Notes and loans payable
(c) (note 12)
  
 
122
 
  227 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
(a) (note 11)
  
 
5,184
 
  3,153 
Income taxes payable
  
 
248
 
  0 
Total current liabilities
  
 
5,554
 
  3,380 
Long-term debt
(d) (note 14)
  
 
5,054
 
  4,957 
Other long-term obligations
(note 5)
  
 
3,897
 
  4,100 
Deferred income tax liabilities
(note 3)
  
 
4,542
 
  4,176 
Total liabilities
  
 
19,047
 
  16,613 
   
Commitments and contingent liabilities
(note 9)
       
   
Shareholders’ equity
         
Common shares at stated value
(e) (note 10)
  
 
1,252
 
  1,357 
Earnings reinvested
  
 
21,660
 
  22,050 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(note 17)
  
 
(1,177
  (1,989
Total shareholders’ equity
  
 
21,735
 
  21,418 
   
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  
 
40,782
 
  38,031 
(a)
Accounts receivable - net included net amounts receivable from related parties of $1,031 million (2020 – $384 million), (note 16).
(b)
Investments and long-term receivables included amounts from related parties of $298 million (2020 – $313 million), (note 16).
(c)
Notes and loans payable included amounts to related parties of $0 million (2020 – $111 million), (note 16).
(d)
Long-term debt included amounts to related parties of $4,447 million (2020 – $4,447 million), (note 16).
(e)
Number of common shares authorized and outstanding were 1,100 million and 678 million, respectively (2020 – 1,100 million and 734 million, respectively), (note 10).
The information in the notes to consolidated financial statements is an integral part of these statements.
Approved by the directors.
/s/
B
radley
W. Corson
/s/
D
aniel
E. Lyons

B.W. Corson

D.E. Lyons
Chairman, president andSenior vice-president,
chief executive officerfinance and administration, and controller
77

Consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity (U.S. GAAP)
millions of Canadian dollars            
At December 31  
            2021
               2020               2019 
Common shares at stated value
(note 10)
               
At beginning of year
  
 
1,357
 
   1,375    1,446 
Share purchases at stated value
  
 
(105)
 
   (18)    (71) 
At end of year
  
 
1,252
 
   1,357    1,375 
    
Earnings reinvested
               
At beginning of year
  
 
22,050
 
   24,812    24,560 
Net income (loss) for the year
  
 
2,479
 
   (1,857)    2,200 
Share purchases in excess of stated value
  
 
(2,140)
 
   (256)    (1,302) 
Dividends declared
  
 
(729)
 
   (647)    (646) 
Cumulative effect of accounting change
  
 
0
 
   (2)    0 
At end of year
  
 
21,660
 
   22,050    24,812 
    
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(note 17)
               
At beginning of year
  
 
(1,989)
 
   (1,911)    (1,517) 
Other comprehensive income (loss)
  
 
812
 
   (78)    (394) 
At end of year
  
 
(1,177)
 
   (1,989)    (1,911) 
    
Shareholders’ equity at end of year
  
 
21,735
 
   21,418    24,276 
The information in the notes to consolidated financial statements is an integral part of these statements.
78

Consolidated statement of cash flows (U.S. GAAP)
millions of Canadian dollars          
Inflow (outflow)          
For the years ended December 31  
            2021
              2020              2019 
Operating activities
             
Net income (loss)
  
 
2,479
 
  (1,857  2,200 
Adjustments for
non-cash
items:
             
Depreciation and depletion (includes impairments)
(note 2)
  
 
1,977
 
  3,273   1,598 
Impairment of intangible assets
(note 11)
  
 
-
 
  20   0 
(Gain) loss on asset sales
(note 8)
  
 
(49
  (35  (46
Deferred income taxes and other
  
 
91
 
  (521  (237
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
             
Accounts receivable
  
 
(1,950
  780   (170
Inventories, materials, supplies and prepaid expenses
  
 
45
 
  78   (74
Income taxes payable
  
 
248
 
  (106  41 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  
 
2,020
 
  (1,087  1,010 
All other items - net
(b)
  
 
615
 
  253   107 
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities
  
 
5,476
 
  798   4,429 
    
Investing activities
             
Additions to property, plant and equipment
  
 
(1,108
  (868  (1,636
Proceeds from asset sales
(note 8)
  
 
81
 
  82   82 
Loans to equity companies - net
  
 
15
 
  (16  (150
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities
  
 
(1,012
  (802  (1,704
    
Financing activities
             
Short-term debt - net
(note 12)
  
 
(111
  0   36 
Reduction in finance lease obligations
(note 14)
  
 
(20
  (20  (27
Dividends paid
  
 
(706
  (649  (631
Common shares purchased
(note 10)
  
 
(2,245
  (274  (1,373
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities
  
 
(3,082
  (943  (1,995
    
Increase (decrease) in cash
  
 
1,382
 
  (947  730 
Cash at beginning of year
  
 
771
 
  1,718   988 
Cash at end of year
(a)
  
 
2,153
 
  771   1,718 
(a)  Cash is composed of cash in bank and cash equivalents at cost. Cash equivalents are all highly liquid securities with maturity of three months or less when purchased.    
   
(b)  Included contributions to registered pension plans.
  
 
(164
  (195  (211
    
Income taxes (paid) refunded.
  
 
58
 
  (42  145 
Interest (paid), net of capitalization.
  
 
(43
  (62  (91
Non-cash
transactions
In 2019, the company removed $570 million of assets and corresponding liabilities associated with the Government of Ontario’s revocation of its cap and trade legislation. The impact of this removal was not reflected in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” and “All other items - net” lines on the Consolidated statement of cash flows as it was not a cash transaction.
The information in the notes to consolidated financial statements is an integral part of these statements.

79

Table of Contents
Notes to consolidated financial statements
The accompanying consolidated financial statements and the supporting and supplemental material are the responsibility of the management of Imperial Oil Limited.
The company’s principal business involves exploration for, and production of, crude oil and natural gas; manufacture, trade, transport and sale of crude oil, natural gas, petroleum products, petrochemicals and a variety of specialty products; and pursuit of lower-emission business opportunities including carbon capture and storage, and biofuels.lower-emission fuels.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP), which requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Prior years’ data have been reclassified in certain cases to conform to the 20212023 presentation basis. All amounts are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated.
1.    Summary of significant accounting policies
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of subsidiaries the company controls. Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. Subsidiaries include those companies in which Imperial has both an equity interest and the continuing ability to unilaterally determine strategic, operating, investing and financing policies. Imperial Oil Resources Limited and Canada Imperial Oil Limited are significant subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements and are wholly owned by Imperial Oil Limited. The consolidated financial statements also include the company’s share of the undivided interest in certain upstream assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, including i
tsits 70.96 percent interest in the Kearl joint venture and its 25 percent interest in the Syncrude joint venture.
Revenues
ImperialThe company generally sells crude oil, natural gas and petroleum and chemical products under short-term agreements at prevailing market prices. In some cases, products may be sold under long-term agreements, with periodic price adjustments to reflect market conditions.
Revenue is recognized at the amount the company expects to receive when the customer has taken control, which is typically when title transfers and the customer has assumed the risks and rewards of ownership. The prices of certain sales are based on price indices that are sometimes not available until the next period. In such cases, estimated realizations are accrued when the sale is recognized, and are finalized when final information is available. Such adjustments to revenue from performance obligations satisfied in previous periods are not significant. Payment for revenue transactions is typically due within 30 days.
Revenues include amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling. Shipping and handling costs incurred up to the point of final storage prior to delivery to a customer are included in “Purchases of crude oil and products” in the Consolidated statement of income. Delivery costs from final storage to customer are recorded as a marketing expense in “Selling and general” expenses. The company does not enter into ongoing arrangements whereby it is required to repurchase its products, nor does the company provide the customer with a right of return.
Future volume delivery obligations that are unsatisfied at the end of the period are expected to be fulfilled through ordinary production or purchases. These performance obligations are based on market prices at the time of the transaction and are fully constrained due to market price volatility.
Purchases and sales of inventory with the same counterparty that are entered into in contemplation of one another are combined and recorded as exchanges measured at the book value of the item sold.

“Revenues”
80

"Revenues" and “Accounts"Accounts receivable - net” primarily arisenet" include revenue and receivables both within the scope of ASC 606Revenue from contractsContracts with customers.Customers, and those outside the scope of ASC 606. Long-term receivables are primarily from
non-customers.
receivables outside the scope of
ASC 606. Contract assets are mainly from marketing assistance programs and are not significant. Contract liabilities are mainly customer prepayments loyalty programs and accruals of expected volume discounts, and are not significant.

80

Consumer taxes
Taxes levied on the consumer and collected by the company are excluded from the Consolidated statement of income. These are primarily provincial taxes on motor fuels, the federal goods and services tax and the federal / provincial harmonized sales tax.
Derivative instruments
ImperialThe company may use derivative instruments for trading purposes and to offset exposures associated with commodity prices, currency exchange rates and interest rates that arise from existing assets, liabilities, firm commitments and forecasted transactions. All derivative instruments, except those designated as normal purchase and normal sale, are recorded at fair value. Derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty are netted if the right of offset exists and certain other criteria are met. Collateral payables or receivables are netted against derivative assets and derivative liabilities, respectively.
Recognition and classification of the gain or loss that results from adjusting a derivative to fair value depends on the purpose for the derivative. The gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded under “Revenues”"Revenues" or “Purchases"Purchases of crude oil and products”products" in the Consolidated statement of income.
Fair value
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Hierarchy levels 1, 2 and 3 are terms for the priority of inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Hierarchy level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Hierarchy level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Hierarchy level 3 inputs are inputs that are not observable in the market.
Inventories
Inventories are recorded at the lower of current market value or cost. The cost of crude oil and products is determined primarily using the
last-in,
first-out
(LIFO) method. LIFO was selected over the alternative
first-in,
first-out
and average cost methods because it provides a better matching of current costs with the revenues generated in the period.
Inventory costs include expenditures and other charges (including depreciation), directly orand indirectly incurred in bringing the inventory to its existing condition and location. Selling and general expenses are reported as period costs and excluded from inventory costs. Inventories of materials and supplies are valued at cost or less.
Investments
The company’s interests in the underlying net assets of affiliates it does not control, but over which it exercises significant influence, are accounted for using the equity method. They are recorded at the original cost of the investment plus Imperial’sthe company’s share of earnings since the investment was made, less dividends received. Imperial’sThe company’s share of the
after-tax
earnings of these investments is included in “Investment and other income” in the Consolidated statement of income. Investments in equity securities, other than consolidated subsidiaries and equity method investments, are measured at fair value, with changes in the fair value recognized in net income. The company uses a modified approach for equity securities that do not have a readily determinable fair value. This modified approach measures investments at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions in similar investmentinvestments of the same issuer. Dividends from these investments are included in “Investment and other income”.
These investments represent interests in
non-publicly
traded pipeline companies and a rail loading joint venture that facilitate the sale and purchase of liquids in the conduct of company operations. Other parties who also have an equity interest in these investments share in the risks and rewards according to their percentage of ownership. ImperialThe company does not invest in these investments in order to remove liabilities from its balance sheet.

81


Property, plant and equipment
Cost basis
ImperialThe company uses the “successful efforts”"successful efforts" method to account for its exploration and production activities. Under this method, costs are accumulated on a
field-by-field
basis. Costs incurred to purchase, lease, or otherwise acquire a property (whether unproved or proved) are capitalized when incurred. Exploratory well costs are carried as an asset when the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well and where the company is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. Exploratory well costs not meeting these criteria are charged to expense. Other exploratory expenditures, including geophysical costs and annual lease rentals, are expensed as incurred. Development costs, including costs of productive wells and development dry holes, are capitalized.
Interest costs incurred to finance expenditures during the construction phase of projects are capitalized as part of the historical cost of acquiring the constructed assets. The project construction phase commences with the development of the detailed engineering design and ends when the constructed assets are ready for their intended use. Capitalized interest costs are included in property, plant and equipment and are depreciated over the service life of the related assets.
Maintenance and repair costs, including planned major maintenance, are expensed as incurred. Improvements that increase or prolong the service life or capacity of an asset are capitalized.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
Depreciation, depletion and amortization are primarily determined under either the
unit-of-production
method or the straight-line method, which is based on estimated asset service life taking obsolescence into consideration. Depreciation and depletion for assets associated with producing properties begin at the time when production commences on a regular basis. Depreciation for other assets begins when the asset is in place and ready for its intended use. Assets under construction are not depreciated or depleted.
Acquisition costs of proved properties are amortized using a
unit-of-production
method, computed on the basis of total proved oil and natural gas reserve volumes. Capitalized exploratory drilling and development costs associated with productive depletable extractive properties are amortized using the
unit-of-production
rates based on the amount of proved developed reserves of oil and gas that are estimated to be recoverable from existing facilities using current operating methods. Under the
unit-of-production
method, oil and natural gas volumes are considered produced once they have been measured through meters at custody transfer or sales transaction points at the outlet valve on the lease or field storage tank. In the event that the
unit-of-production
method does not result in an equitable allocation of cost over the economic life of an upstream asset, an alternative method is used. The straight-line method is used in limited situations where the expected life of the asset does not reasonably correlate with that of the underlying reserves. For example, certain assets used in the production of oil and natural gas have a shorter life than the reserves, and as such, the company uses straight-line depreciation to ensure the asset is fully depreciated by the end of its useful life. Investments in mining heavy equipment and certain ore processing plant assets at oil sands mining properties are depreciated on a straight-line basis over a maximum of 15 years and 50 years respectively. Depreciation of other plant and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method, based on the estimated service life of the asset.
To the extent that proved reserves for a property are substantially
de-booked
and that property continues to produce such that the resulting depreciation charge does not result in an equitable allocation of cost over the expected life, assets will be depreciated using a
unit-of-production
method based on reserves determined at the most recent SEC price which results in a more meaningful quantity of proved reserves, appropriately adjusted for production and technical changes. This approach was applied in 2021, with the corresponding effect on depreciation expense being immaterial compared to prior periods. For 2022, all properties have sufficient reserves at current SEC prices which will enable equitable allocation of cost over the economic lives of the Upstream assets.
Investments in refinery and chemical process manufacturing equipment are generally depreciated on a straight-line basis over a
25-year
life. Maintenance and repairs, including planned major maintenance, are expensed as incurred. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized and the assets replaced are retired.


82


Impairment assessment
The company tests assets or groups of assets for recoverability on an ongoing basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
Among the events or changes in circumstances which could indicate that the carrying value of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable are the following:
a significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset;
a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is being used or in its physical condition including a significant decrease in current and projected reserve volumes;
a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value, including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator;
an accumulation of project costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected;
a current-period operating loss combined with a history and forecast of operating or cash flow losses; and
a current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life.
a significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset;
a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is being used or in its physical condition including a significant decrease in current and projected reserve volumes;
a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value, including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator;
an accumulation of project costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected;
a current-period operating loss combined with a history and forecast of operating or cash flow losses; and
a current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life.
The company has a robust process to monitor for indicators of potential impairment across its asset groups throughout the year. This process is aligned with the requirements of
ASC 360
and
ASC 932
and relies, in part, on the company’s planning and budgeting cycle. Asset valuation analysis, profitability reviews and other periodic control processes assist the company in assessing whether events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amounts of any of its assets may not be recoverable.
Because the lifespans of the vast majority of the company’s major assets are measured in decades, the future cash flows of these assets are predominantly based on long-term oil and natural gas commodity prices, industry margins, and development and production costs. Significant reductions in the company’s view of oil or natural gas commodity prices or margin ranges, especially the longer-term prices and margins, and changes in the development plans, including decisions to defer, reduce or eliminate planned capital spending, can be an indicator of potential impairment. Other events or changes in circumstances, including indicators outlined in
ASC 360
can be indicators of potential impairment as well.
In general, Imperialthe company does not view temporarily low prices or margins as an indication of impairment. Management believes that prices over the long term must be sufficient to generate investments in energy supply to meet global demand. Although prices will occasionally drop significantly, industry prices over the long term will continue to be driven by market supply and demand fundamentals. On the supply side, industry production from mature fields is declining. This is being offset by investments to generate production from new discoveries, field developments, and technology and efficiency advancements. OPECOPEC+ investment activities and production policies also have an impact on world oil supplies. The demand side is largely a function of general economic activities, alternative energy sources and levels of prosperity. During the lifespan of its major assets, the company expects that oil and gas prices and industry margins will experience significant volatility, and consequently,volatility. Consequently, these assets will experience periods of higher earnings and periods of lower earnings, or even losses. In assessing whether events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable, the company considers recent periods of operating losses in the context of its longer-term view of prices and margins.
In the Upstream, the standardized measure of discounted cash flows included in the “Supplemental information on oil and gas exploration and production activities” is required to use prices based on the average of
first-day-of-month
prices in the year. These prices represent discrete points in time and could be higher or lower than the company’s price assumptions which are used for impairment assessments. The company believes the standardized measure does not provide a reliable estimate of the expected future cash flows to be obtained from the development and production of its oil and gas properties or of the value of its oil and gas reserves and therefore does not consider it relevant in determining whether events or changes in circumstances indicate the need for an impairment assessment.


83


EnergyGlobal Outlook and cash flow assessment
The annual planning and budgeting process, known as the company plan, is the mechanism by which resources (capital, operating expenses and people) are allocated across the company. The foundation for the energy supply and demand assumptions supporting the company plan begins with Exxon Mobil Corporation’s
Global Outlook for Energy
(the Outlook), which contains demand and supply projections based on its assessment of current trends in technology, government policies, consumer preferences, geopolitics, economic development, and economic development.other factors.
Reflective of the existing global policy environment, the Outlook does not attempt to project the degree of required future policy and technology advancement and deployment for the world or the company, to meet net-zeronet zero by 2050. As future policies and technology advancements emerge, they will be incorporated into the Outlook, and consequently, the company’s business plans will be updated accordingly.

If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable, the company estimates the future undiscounted cash flows of the affected properties to judge the recoverability of carrying amounts. In performing this assessment, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets. Cash flows used in recoverability assessments are based on the assumptions developed in the company plan, which is reviewed and approved by the board of directors, and are consistent with the criteria management uses to evaluate investment opportunities. These evaluations make use of the company’s assumptions of future capital allocations, crude oil and natural gas commodity prices including price differentials, refining and chemical margins, volumes, development and operating costs, including greenhouse gas emissions prices, and foreign currency exchange rates. Volumes are based on projected field and facility production profiles, throughput, or sales. Management’s estimate of upstream production volumes used for projected cash flows makes use of proved reserve quantities and may include risk-adjusted unproved reserve quantities. The greenhouse gas emission prices reflect existing or anticipated policy actions of applicable provincial and federal governments.

Fair value of impaired assets
An asset group is impaired if its estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the asset group’s carrying value. Impairments are measured by the amount by whichexcess of the carrying value exceedsover fair value. The assessment of fair value is based on the views of a likely market participant. The principal parameters used to establish fair value include estimates of acreage values and flowing production metrics from comparable market transactions, market-based estimates of historical cash flow multiples, and discounted cash flows. Inputs and assumptions used in discounted cash flow models include estimates of future production volumes, throughput and product sales volumes, commodity prices which(which are consistent with the average of third-party industry experts and government agencies,agencies), refining and chemical margins, drilling and development costs, operating costs, and discount rates which are reflective of the characteristics of the asset group.

Other impairment estimates
Unproved properties are assessed periodically to determine whether they have been impaired. Significant unproved properties are assessed for impairment individually, and valuation allowances against the capitalized costs are recorded based on the company’s future development plans, the estimated economic chance of success and the length of time that the company expects to hold the properties. Properties that are not individually significant are aggregated by groups and amortized based on development risk and average holding period.
Long-lived assets that are held for sale are evaluated for possible impairment by comparing the carrying value of the asset with its fair value less the cost to sell. If the net book value exceeds the fair value less cost to sell, the assets are considered impaired and adjusted to the lower value. Gains on sales of proved and unproved properties are only recognized when there is neither uncertainty about the recovery of costs applicable to any interest retained nor any substantial obligation for future performance by the company. Losses on properties sold are recognized when incurred or when the properties are held for sale and the fair value of the properties is less than the carrying value.

Interest capitalization
Interest costs incurred to finance expenditures during the construction phase of projects are capitalized as part of the historical cost of acquiring the constructed assets. The project construction phase commences with the development of the detailed engineering design and ends when the constructed assets are ready for their intended use. Capitalized interest costs are included in property, plant and equipment and are depreciated over the service life of the related assets.

84


Asset retirement obligations and other environmental liabilities
The company incurs retirement obligations for certain assets. The fair values of these obligations are recorded as liabilities on a discounted basis, which is typically at the time the assets are installed. In the estimation of fair value, the company uses assumptions and judgments regarding such factors as the existence of a legal obligation for an asset retirement obligation, technical assessments of the assets, estimated amounts and timing of settlements, discount rates and inflation rates. Asset retirement obligations incurred in the current period were levelLevel 3 fair value measurements. The costs associated with these liabilities are capitalized as part of the related assets and depreciated as the reserves are produced. Over time, the liabilities are accreted for the change in their present value.
Asset retirement obligations for downstream and chemical facilities generally become firm at the time the facilities are permanently shut down and dismantled. These obligations may include the costs of asset disposal and additional soil remediation. However, these sites generally have indeterminate lives based on plans for continued operations, and as such, the fair value of the conditional legal obligations cannot be measured, since it is impossible to estimate the future settlement dates of such obligations. Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements provides a three-year continuity table detailing the changes in asset retirement obligations.
The company accrues environmental liabilities when it is probable that obligations have been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Provisions for environmental liabilities are determined based on engineering estimated costs, taking into account the anticipated method and extent of remediation consistent with legal requirements, current technology and the possible use of the location. These provisions are not reduced by possible recoveries from third parties and projected cash expenditures are not discounted.
Foreign-currency translation
Monetary assets and liabilities in foreign currencies have been translated at the rates of exchange prevailing on December 31. Any exchange gains or losses are recognized in income.

85

Table of Contents
2.    Business segments
The company operates its business in Canada. TheCanada, and its reportable segments are Upstream, Downstream and Chemical functions best define the operating segments of the business that are reported separately.Chemical. The factors used to identify these reportable segments are based on the nature of the operations that are undertaken by each segment and the structure of the company’s internal organization. The Upstream segment is organized and operates to explore for and ultimately produce crude oil and its equivalent, and natural gas. The Downstream segment is organized and operates to refine crude oil into petroleum products and to distribute and market these products. The Chemical segment is organized and operates to manufacture and market hydrocarbon-based chemicals and chemical products. The above segmentation has been the long-standing practice of the company and is broadly understood across the petroleum and petrochemical industries.
These functions have been defined as the operating segments of the company because they are the segments (a) that engage in business activities from which revenues are earned and expenses are incurred; (b) whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the company’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to each segment and assess its performance; and (c) for which discrete financial information is available.
Corporate and other includes assets and liabilities that do not specifically relate to business segments – primarily cash, capitalized interest costs, short-term borrowings, long-term debt and liabilities associated with incentive compensation, pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities. Net earnings effects under Corporate and other activities primarily include debt-related financing, corporate governance costs,
non-service
pension and postretirement benefit costs, share-based incentive compensation expenses and interest income.
Segment accounting policies are the same as those described in the summarynote 1, "Summary of significant accounting policies.policies". Upstream, Downstream and Chemical expenses include amounts allocated from Corporate and other activities. The allocation is based on proportional segment expenses. Transfers of assets between segments are recorded at book amounts. Intersegment sales are made essentially at prevailing market prices. Assets and liabilities that are not identifiable by segment are allocated.


86

      Upstream       Downstream      Chemical 
millions of Canadian dollars 
    2021
      2020      2019  
    2021
      2020      2019  
    2021
      2020      2019 
Revenues and other income
                                    
Revenues
(a)
 
 
5,863
 
  6,263   9,479  
 
30,207
 
  15,178   23,591  
 
1,438
 
  843   932 
Intersegment sales
(b)
 
 
9,956
 
  2,527   3,763  
 
4,520
 
  1,480   1,597  
 
319
 
  165   229 
Investment and other income
(note 8)
 
 
12
 
  7   17  
 
59
 
  78   47  
 
1
 
  -   - 
  
 
15,831
 
  8,797   13,259  
 
34,786
 
  16,736   25,235  
 
1,758
 
  1,008   1,161 
Expenses
                                    
Exploration
(note 15)
 
 
32
 
  13   47  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
0
 
  -   - 
Purchases of crude oil and products
(b) (note 11)
 
 
7,492
 
  4,834   6,528  
 
29,505
 
  12,047   19,332  
 
966
 
  579   667 
Production and manufacturing
(note 11)
 
 
4,661
 
  3,852   4,440  
 
1,445
 
  1,468   1,829  
 
210
 
  215   251 
Selling and general 
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
572
 
  619   774  
 
90
 
  92   86 
Federal excise tax and fuel charge 
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
1,928
 
  1,736   1,808  
 
0
 
  -   - 
Depreciation and depletion
(c) (note 11)
 
 
1,775
 
  3,084   1,374  
 
158
 
  166   186  
 
18
 
  19   16 
Non-service
pension and postretirement benefit
 
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
0
 
  -   - 
Financing
(note 12)
 
 
15
 
  3   3  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
0
 
  -   - 
Total expenses
 
 
13,975
 
  11,786   12,392  
 
33,608
 
  16,036   23,929  
 
1,284
 
  905   1,020 
Income (loss) before income taxes
(note 11)
 
 
1,856
 
  (2,989  867  
 
1,178
 
  700   1,306  
 
474
 
  103   141 
Income tax expense (benefit)
(d) (note 3)
 
 
461
 
  (671  (481 
 
283
 
  147   345  
 
113
 
  25   33 
Net income (loss)
(note 11)
 
 
1,395
 
  (2,318  1,348  
 
895
 
  553   961  
 
361
 
  78   108 
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities
(b)
 
 
4,913
 
  286   2,423  
 
179
 
  470   1,965  
 
421
 
  114   172 
Capital and exploration expenditures
(e)
 
 
632
 
  561   1,248  
 
476
 
  251   484  
 
8
 
  21   34 
Property, plant and equipment
                                    
Cost 
 
48,200
 
  47,693   47,050  
 
6,772
 
  6,321   6,123  
 
984
 
  975   954 
Accumulated depreciation and depletion 
 
(20,389
  (18,786  (15,889 
 
(4,096
  (3,962  (3,830 
 
(721
  (699  (680
Net property, plant and equipment
(f)
 
 
27,811
 
  28,907   31,161  
 
2,676
 
  2,359   2,293  
 
263
 
  276   274 
Total assets
(b) (g) (h)
 
 
29,416
 
  31,835   34,554  
 
7,945
 
  4,554   5,179  
 
474
 
  408   416 
    
      Corporate and other       Eliminations      Consolidated 
millions of Canadian dollars 
    2021
      2020      2019  
    2021
      2020      2019  
    2021
      2020      2019 
Revenues and other income
                                    
Revenues
(a)
 
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
37,508
 
  22,284   34,002 
Intersegment sales
(b)
 
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
(14,795
  (4,172  (5,589 
 
0
 
  -   - 
Investment and other income
(note 8)
 
 
10
 
  19   35  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
82
 
  104   99 
  
 
10
 
  19   35  
 
(14,795
  (4,172  (5,589 
 
37,590
 
  22,388   34,101 
Expenses
                                    
Exploration
(note 15)
 
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
32
 
  13   47 
Purchases of crude oil and products
(b) (note 11)
 
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
(14,789
  (4,167  (5,581 
 
23,174
 
  13,293   20,946 
Production and manufacturing
(note 11)
 
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
6,316
 
  5,535   6,520 
Selling and general 
 
128
 
  35   48  
 
(6
  (5  (8 
 
784
 
  741   900 
Federal excise tax and fuel charge 
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
1,928
 
  1,736   1,808 
Depreciation and depletion
(c) (note 11)
 
 
26
 
  24   22  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
1,977
 
  3,293   1,598 
Non-service
pension and postretirement benefit
 
 
42
 
  121   143  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
42
 
  121   143 
Financing
(note 12)
 
 
39
 
  61   90  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
54
 
  64   93 
Total expenses
 
 
235
 
  241   303  
 
(14,795
  (4,172  (5,589 
 
34,307
 
  24,796   32,055 
Income (loss) before income taxes
(note 11)
 
 
(225
  (222  (268 
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
3,283
 
  (2,408  2,046 
Income tax expense (benefit)
(d) (note 3)
 
 
(53
  (52  (51 
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
804
 
  (551  (154
Net income (loss)
(note 11)
 
 
(172
  (170  (217 
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
2,479
 
  (1,857  2,200 
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities
(b)
 
 
(47
  (64  (124 
 
10
 
  (8  (7 
 
5,476
 
  798   4,429 
Capital and exploration expenditures
(e)
 
 
24
 
  41   48  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
1,140
 
  874   1,814 
Property, plant and equipment
                                    
Cost 
 
806
 
  782   741  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
56,762
 
  55,771   54,868 
Accumulated depreciation and depletion 
 
(316
  (290  (266 
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
(25,522
  (23,737  (20,665
Net property, plant and equipment
(f)
 
 
490
 
  492   475  
 
0
 
  -   -  
 
31,240
 
  32,034   34,203 
Total assets
(b) (g) (h)
 
 
3,196
 
  1,632   2,536  
 
(249
  (398  (498 
 
40,782
 
  38,031   42,187 
      Upstream    Downstream    Chemical
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 2023 2022 2021 2023 2022 2021 
Revenues and other income         
Revenues (a) (b)
222 494 5,863 49,241 57,466 30,207 1,239 1,453 1,438 
Intersegment sales (c)
16,274 19,135 9,956 6,509 7,476 4,520 342 523 319 
Investment and other income (note 8, 18)
16 135 12 108 43 59  — 
16,512 19,764 15,831 55,858 64,985 34,786 1,581 1,976 1,758 
Expenses         
Exploration (note 15)
5 32  — —  — — 
Purchases of crude oil and products (c) (note 11)
6,636 7,971 7,492 47,886 55,569 29,505 997 1,330 966 
Production and manufacturing4,917 5,491 4,661 1,702 1,640 1,445 260 273 210 
Selling and general — — 693 653 572 89 85 90 
Federal excise tax and fuel charge — — 2,399 2,177 1,928 3 — 
Depreciation and depletion1,680 1,673 1,775 183 179 158 15 18 18 
Non-service pension and postretirement benefit — —  — —  — — 
Financing (note 12)
7 15  —  — — 
Total expenses13,245 15,145 13,975 52,863 60,219 33,608 1,364 1,708 1,284 
Income (loss) before income taxes (note 11)
3,267 4,619 1,856 2,995 4,766 1,178 217 268 474 
Income tax expense (benefit) (note 3)
755 974 461 694 1,144 283 53 64 113 
Net income (loss) (c) (note 11)
2,512 3,645 1,395 2,301 3,622 895 164 204 361 
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities (c)
3,100 5,834 4,913 608 4,415 179 53 276 421 
Capital and exploration expenditures (d)
1,108 1,128 632 472 295 476 23 10 
Property, plant and equipment         
Cost46,776 45,784 48,200 7,368 6,926 6,772 1,018 995 984 
Accumulated depreciation and depletion(19,936)(18,835)(20,389)(4,301)(4,143)(4,096)(757)(741)(721)
Net property, plant and equipment (e)
26,840 26,949 27,811 3,067 2,783 2,676 261 254 263 
Total assets (c)
28,718 28,830 29,416 10,114 9,277 7,945 475 491 474 

      Corporate and other     Eliminations      Consolidated
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 2023 2022 2021 2023 2022 2021 
Revenues and other income         
Revenues (a) (b)
 — —  — — 50,702 59,413 37,508 
Intersegment sales (c)
 — — (23,125)(27,134)(14,795) — — 
Investment and other income (note 8, 18)
143 79 10  — — 267 257 82 
143 79 10 (23,125)(27,134)(14,795)50,969 59,670 37,590 
Expenses         
Exploration (note 15)
 — —  — — 5 32 
Purchases of crude oil and products (c) (note 11)
 — — (23,120)(27,128)(14,789)32,399 37,742 23,174 
Production and manufacturing — —  — — 6,879 7,404 6,316 
Selling and general80 150 128 (5)(6)(6)857 882 784 
Federal excise tax and fuel charge — —  — — 2,402 2,179 1,928 
Depreciation and depletion29 27 26  — — 1,907 1,897 1,977 
Non-service pension and postretirement benefit82 17 42  — — 82 17 42 
Financing (note 12)
62 54 39  — — 69 60 54 
Total expenses253 248 235 (23,125)(27,134)(14,795)44,600 50,186 34,307 
Income (loss) before income taxes (note 11)
(110)(169)(225) — — 6,369 9,484 3,283 
Income tax expense (benefit) (note 3)
(22)(38)(53) — — 1,480 2,144 804 
Net income (loss) (c) (note 11)
(88)(131)(172) — — 4,889 7,340 2,479 
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities (c)
(37)(59)(47)10 16 10 3,734 10,482 5,476 
Capital and exploration expenditures (d)
175 57 24  — — 1,778 1,490 1,140 
Property, plant and equipment         
Cost1,038 863 806  — — 56,200 54,568 56,762 
Accumulated depreciation and depletion(371)(343)(316) — — (25,365)(24,062)(25,522)
Net property, plant and equipment (e)
667 520 490  — — 30,835 30,506 31,240 
Total assets (c)
2,366 5,312 3,196 (474)(386)(249)41,199 43,524 40,782 
87

(a)Includes export sales to the United States of Contents$8,982 million (2022 - $12,394 million, 2021 - $7,228 million).
(b)Revenues include both revenue within the scope of ASC 606 and outside the scope of ASC 606. Trade receivables in "Accounts receivable – net" reported on the Consolidated balance sheet include both receivables within the scope of ASC 606 and outside the scope of ASC 606. Revenue and receivables outside the scope of ASC 606 primarily relate to physically settled commodity contracts accounted for as derivatives. Contractual terms, credit quality and type of customer are generally similar between contracts within the scope of ASC 606 and those outside it.
(a)
Includes export sales to the United States of $7,228 million (2020 - $4,614 million, 2019 - $7,190 million). Export sales to the United States were recorded in all operating segments, with the largest effects in the Upstream segment.
Revenues
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Revenue from contracts with customers44,465 52,265 34,275 
Revenue outside the scope of ASC 606
6,237 7,148 3,233 
Total50,702 59,413 37,508 
(c)In 2021, the Downstream segment acquired a portion of Upstream crude inventory for $444 million. There was no earnings impact and the effects of this transaction have been eliminated for consolidation purposes.
(d)Capital and exploration expenditures (CAPEX) include exploration expenses, additions to property, plant and equipment, additions to finance leases, additional investments and acquisitions and the company’s share of similar costs for equity companies. CAPEX excludes the purchase of carbon emission credits.
(e)Includes property, plant and equipment under construction of $3,251 million (2022 - $2,676 million, 2021 - $2,348 million).
(b)
In 2021, the Downstream segment acquired a portion of Upstream crude inventory for $444 million. There was no earnings impact and the effects of this transaction have been eliminated for consolidation purposes.
(c)
In 2020, the Upstream segment included a
non-cash
impairment charge of $1,531 million,
before-tax,
related to the company’s decision not to further develop a significant portion of its unconventional portfolio.
(d)
Segment results in 2019 include a largely
non-cash
favourable impact of $662 million associated with the Alberta corporate income tax rate decrease, with the largest impact in the Upstream segment.
(e)
Capital and exploration expenditures (CAPEX) include exploration expenses, additions to property, plant and equipment, additions to finance leases, additional investments and acquisitions and the company’s share of similar costs for equity companies. CAPEX excludes the purchase of carbon emission credits.
(f)
Includes property, plant and equipment under construction of $2,348 million (2020 - $1,874 million, 2019 - $2,149 million).
(g)
Effective January 1, 2019, Imperial adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s standard,
Leases (Topic 842)
, as amended. As at December 31, 2021, Total assets include operating lease right of use assets of $245 million (2020 - $188 million, 2019 - $260 million). An election was made not to restate prior periods. See note 13 for additional details.
(h)
In 2019, the company removed $570 million from Total assets and corresponding liabilities in the Downstream segment associated with the Government of Ontario’s revocation of its cap and trade legislation.
3.    Income taxes

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Current income tax expense (benefit)1,556 2,228 711 
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
(76)(84)93 
Total income tax expense (benefit)1,480 2,144 804 
Statutory corporate tax rate (percent)
24.1 24.1 24.0 
Increase (decrease) resulting from:   
Other (a)
(0.9)(1.5)0.5 
Effective income tax rate (percent)
23.2 22.6 24.5 
(a)Other primarily relates to prior year adjustments, disposals, investment tax credits and re-assessments. In 2022, the company's sale of its interests in XTO Energy Canada decreased the effective income tax rate by 1.3 percent.
millions of Canadian dollars
  
 
            2021
 
               2020               2019 
Current income tax expense
(benefit) (a)
  
 
711
 
   (27  140 
Deferred income tax expense
(benefit) (a)
  
 
93
 
   (524  (294
Total income tax expense
(benefit) (a)
  
 
804
 
   (551  (154
Statutory corporate tax rate
(percent)
  
 
24.0
 
   25.0   26.0 
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
              
Enacted tax rate change
(a)
  
 
0
 
   0.1   (31.9
Other
(b)
  
 
0.5
 
   (2.2  (1.6
Effective income tax rate
(percent)
  
 
24.5
 
   22.9   (7.5
(a)
On June 28, 2019 the Alberta government enacted a 4 percent decrease in the provincial tax rate, from 12 percent to 8 percent by 2022. On December 9, 2020 the Alberta government enacted an accelerated decrease in the province’s general corporate income tax rate from 10 percent to 8 percent, effective July 1, 2020. The cumulative effect of the 2020 legislative tax changes on the company’s financial statements were immaterial.
(b)
Other primarily relates to prior year adjustments,
re-assessments
and disposals.
Deferred income taxes are based on differences between the accounting and tax values of assets and liabilities. These differences in value are
re-measured
at each
year-end
using the tax rates and tax laws expected to apply when those differences are realized or settled in the future. Components of deferred income tax liabilities and assets as at December 31 were:

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Depreciation and amortization5,366 5,388 5,284 
Successful drilling and land acquisitions237 236 331 
Pension and benefits(168)(105)(303)
Asset retirement obligation(655)(529)(418)
Capitalized interest155 127 120 
LIFO inventory valuation(406)(454)(413)
Tax loss carryforwards(69)(84)(42)
Valuation allowance69 73 — 
Other(60)(53)(101)
Net deferred income tax liabilities4,469 4,599 4,458 

millions of Canadian dollars
  
 
            2021
 
              2020               2019 
Depreciation and amortization
  
 
5,284
 
  5,319   5,164 
Successful drilling and land acquisitions
  
 
331
 
  363   750 
Pension and benefits
  
 
(303
  (534  (469
Asset retirement obligation
  
 
(418
  (403  (336
Capitalized interest
  
 
120
 
  120   117 
LIFO inventory valuation
  
 
(413
  (150  (276
Tax loss carryforwards
  
 
(42
  (460  (141
Other
  
 
(101
  (154  (161
Net deferred income tax liabilities
  
 
4,458
 
  4,101   4,648 









88


Unrecognized tax benefits
Unrecognized tax benefits reflect the difference between positions taken or expected to be taken on income tax returns and the amounts recognized in the financial statements.
The following table summarizes the movement in unrecognized tax benefits:

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Balance as of January 160 47 36 
Additions based on current year’s tax position7 12 16 
Additions for prior years’ tax positions 10 — 
Settlements with tax authorities(20)(9)(5)
Balance as of December 3147 60 47 
millions of Canadian dollars
  
 
        2021
 
          2020           2019 
Balance as of January 1
  
 
36
 
  35   36 
Additions based on current year’s tax position
  
 
16
 
  2   - 
Additions for prior years’ tax positions
  
 
0
 
  -   1 
Settlements with tax authorities
  
 
(5
  (1  (2
Balance as of December 31
  
 
47
 
  36   35 
The unrecognized tax benefit balances shown above are predominatelypredominantly related to tax positions that would reduce the company’s effective tax rate if the positions are favourably resolved. Unfavourable resolution of these tax positions generally would not increase the effective tax rate. The 2021, 20202023, 2022 and 20192021 changes in unrecognized tax benefits did not have a material effect on the company’s net income or cash flow. The company’s tax filings from 20172018 to 20212023 are subject to examination by the tax authorities. Tax filings from 20072009 to 20162017 have open objections and therefore are also subject to examination by the tax authorities. The Canada Revenue Agency has made certain adjustments to the company’s filings. Management has evaluated these adjustments and is formally disputing those matters to which the company disagrees. Many of these outstanding matters will not be resolved until after 2022.2024. The impact on unrecognized tax benefits and the company’s effective income tax rate from these matters is not expected to be material.
Resolution of the related tax positions could take many years to complete. It is difficult to predict the timing of resolution for tax positions since such timing is not entirely within the control of the company.
The company classifies interest on income tax related balances as interest expense or interest income and classifies tax related penalties as operating expense.
Unrecognized tax benefits are not classified as future commitments because the company does not expect there will be any cash impact from the final settlements as sufficient funds have been deposited with the Canada Revenue Agency.
4.    Employee retirement benefits
Retirement benefits, which cover almost all retired employees and their surviving spouses, include pension income and certain health care and life insurance benefits. They are met through funded registered retirement plans and through unfunded supplementary benefits that are paid directly to recipients.
Pension income benefits consist mainly of company-paid defined benefit plans that are based on years of service and final average earnings. The company shares in the cost of health care and life insurance benefits. The company’s benefit obligations are based on the projected benefit method of valuation that includes employee service to date and present compensation levels, as well as a projection of salaries to retirement.
The expense and obligations for both funded and unfunded benefits are determined in accordance with accepted actuarial practices and U.S. GAAP. The process for determining retirement-income expense and related obligations includes making certain long-term assumptions regarding the discount rate, rate of return on plan assets and rate of compensation increases. The obligation and pension expense can vary significantly with changes in the assumptions used to estimate the obligation and the expected return on plan assets.

8
9

89

The benefit obligations and plan assets associated with the company’s defined benefit plans are measured on December 31.
             Pension benefits        Other postretirement
benefits
 2023 2022 2023 2022 
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31 (percent)
    
Discount rate4.60 5.10 4.60 5.10 
Long-term rate of compensation increase4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 
 
millions of Canadian dollars
Change in benefit obligation    
Benefit obligation at January 17,374 9,850 589 818 
Service cost162 280 12 23 
Interest cost373 295 28 24 
Actuarial loss (gain) (a)
514 (2,528)(14)(248)
Amendments184 —  — 
Benefits paid (b)
(453)(523)(34)(28)
Benefit obligation at December 318,154 7,374 581 589 
 
 Accumulated benefit obligation at December 317,449 6,820   
(a)Actuarial loss (gain) primarily driven by changes in the year-end discount rate and salary experience.
(b)Benefit payments for funded and unfunded plans.
   Pension benefits      Other postretirement
benefits
 
 
  
 
2021
 
  2020          
 
    2021
 
      2020 
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31
(percent)
                      
Discount rate
  3.00   2.50        
 
3.00
   2.50 
Long-term rate of compensation increase
  4.00   4.00        
 
4.00
   4.00 
      
millions of Canadian dollars
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
         
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in benefit obligation
                     
Benefit obligation at January 1
 
 
10,716
 
  9,786       
 
873
   693 
Service cost
 
 
324
 
  305       
 
28
   24 
Interest cost
 
 
271
 
  308       
 
22
   24 
Actuarial loss
(gain) (a)
 
 
(925
  811       
 
(83
)
 

  152 
Benefits paid
(b)
 
 
(536
  (494
)
 

      
 
(22
)

  (20
Benefit obligation at December 31
 
 
9,850
 
  10,716       
 
818
   873 
      
 Accumulated benefit obligation at December 31
 
 
8,885
 
  9,619        
 
     
(a)
Actuarial loss (gain) primarily driven by changes in the
year-end
discount rate, salary experience and lower long-term rate of compensation.
(b)
Benefit payments for funded and unfunded plans.
The discount rate for the purpose of calculating
year-end
postretirement benefits plan obligation is determined by using the Canadian Institute of Actuaries recommended spot yield curve for high-quality, long-term Canadian corporate bonds with an average maturity (or duration) approximating that of the liabilities. For the measurement of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, the assumed health care cost trend rates start with 5.80 percent in 20222024 and gradually decline to 3.57 percent by 20402043 and beyond.
             Pension benefits        Other postretirement
benefits
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2023 2022 
Change in plan assets    
Fair value at January 17,541 9,440 
Actual return (loss) gain785 (1,594)
Company contributions148 174 
Benefits paid (a)
(420)(479)
Fair value at December 318,054 7,541 
 
Plan assets in excess of (less than) projected benefit obligation at December 31    
Funded plans335 543 
Unfunded plans(435)(376)(581)(589)
Total (b)
(100)167 (581)(589)
(a)Benefit payments for funded plans only.
(b)Fair value of assets less projected benefit obligation shown above.
   Pension benefits      Other postretirement
benefits
 
millions of Canadian dollars
  
 
2021
 
 
 
2020
 
         
 
    2021
 
 
 
    2020
 
Change in plan assets
                      
Fair value at January 1
  
 
9,426
 
  8,599             
Actual return on plan assets
  
 
319
 
  1,073             
Company contributions
  
 
164
 
  195             
Benefits paid
(a)
  
 
(469
)
  (441)            
Fair value at December 31
  
 
9,440
 
  9,426             
      
Plan assets in excess of (less than) projected benefit obligation at December 31
                     
Funded plans
  
 
89
 
  (641            
Unfunded plans
  
 
(499
  (649     
 
(818
  (873
Total
(b)
  
 
(410
  (1,290     
 
(818
  (873
(a)
Benefit payments for funded plans only.
(b)
Fair value of assets less projected benefit obligation shown above.
Funding of registered retirement plans complies with federal and provincial pension regulations, and the company makes contributions to the plans based on an independent actuarial valuation. In accordance with authoritative guidance relating to the accounting for defined pension and other postretirement benefits plans, the overfunded or underfunded status of the company’s defined benefit postretirement plans was recorded as an asset or liability in the Consolidated balance sheet, and the changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occurred was recognized through other comprehensive income.
90

             Pension benefits        Other postretirement
benefits
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2023 2022 
Amounts recorded in the Consolidated balance sheet
consist of:
    
Other assets, including intangibles - net335 543  — 
Current liabilities(34)(35)(28)(28)
Other long-term obligations(401)(341)(553)(561)
Total recorded(100)167 (581)(589)
 
Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:    
Net actuarial loss (gain)724 666 (89)(84)
Prior service cost400 235  — 
Total recorded in accumulated other
       comprehensive income, before-tax
1,124 901 (89)(84)

       Pension benefits          Other postretirement
    benefits
 
millions of Canadian dollars
  
 
2021
 
  2020  
 
 
 
  
 
2021
 
  2020 
Amounts recorded in the Consolidated balance sheet
consist of:
                      
Other assets, including intangibles - net   
190
   -        
-
   - 
Current liabilities
  
 
(26
  (27      
 
(30
  (31
Other long-term obligations
  
 
(574
  (1,263      
 
(788
  (842
Total recorded
  
 
(410
  (1,290      
 
(818
  (873
      
Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:
                      
Net actuarial loss (gain)
  
 
1,272
 
  2,232       
 
173
 
  272 
Prior service cost
  
 
252
 
  269       
 
0  
 
  0   
Total recorded in accumulated other
    comprehensive income,
before-tax
  
 
1,524
 
  2,501       
 
173
 
  272 
The company establishes the long-term expected rate of return on plan assets by developing a forward-looking long-term return assumption for each asse
t
asset class, taking into account factors such as the expected real return for the specific asset class and inflation. A single, long-term rate of return is then calculated as the weighted average of the target asset allocation percentages and the long-term return assumption for each asset class. The 20212023 long-term expected return of 4.54.8 percent used in the calculations of pension expense compares to an actual rate of return of 8.55.7 percent and 7.36.1 percent over the last
10-
and
20-year
periods respectively, ending December 31, 2021.2023.
       Pension benefitsOther postretirement benefits
 2023 2022 2021 2023 2022 2021 
Assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost for years ended December 31 (percent)
      
Discount rate5.10 3.00 2.50 5.10 3.00 2.50 
Long-term rate of return on funded assets4.80 4.30 4.50  — — 
Long-term rate of compensation increase4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 
 
millions of Canadian dollars      
Components of net periodic benefit cost      
Service cost162 280 324 12 23 28 
Interest cost373 295 271 28 24 22 
Expected return on plan assets(373)(412)(427) — — 
Amortization of prior service cost19 17 17  — — 
Amortization of actuarial loss (gain)44 84 143 (9)16 
Net periodic benefit cost225 264 328 31 56 66 
 
Changes in amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income      
Net actuarial loss (gain)102 (522)(817)(14)(248)(83)
Amortization of net actuarial (loss) gain included in
       net periodic benefit cost
(44)(84)(143)9 (9)(16)
Prior service cost184 — —  — — 
Amortization of prior service cost included in net
       periodic benefit cost
(19)(17)(17) — — 
Total recorded in other comprehensive income223 (623)(977)(5)(257)(99)
Total recorded in net periodic benefit cost and
       other comprehensive income, before-tax
448 (359)(649)26 (201)(33)
   Pension benefits      Other postretirement
benefits
 
    
2021
  2020  2019       
2021
  2020  2019 
Assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost for years ended December 31
(percent)
                              
Discount rate
  
 
2.50
 
  3.10   3.90       
 
2.50
 
  3.10   3.90 
Long-term rate of return on funded assets
  
 
4.50
 
  4.50   4.50       
 
0  
 
  -     -   
Long-term rate of compensation increase
  
 
4.00
 
  4.50   4.50       
 
4.00
 
  4.50   4.50 
        
millions of Canadian dollars
                              
Components of net periodic benefit cost
                              
Service cost
  
 
324
 
  305   228       
 
28
 
  24   16 
Interest cost
  
 
271
 
  308   324       
 
22
 
  24   20 
Expected return on plan assets
  
 
(427
  (391  (349      
 
0  
 
  -     -   
Amortization of prior service cost
  
 
17
 
  14   -         
 
0  
 
  -     -   
Amortization of actuarial loss (gain)
  
 
143
 
  153   149       
 
16
 
  13   (1
Net periodic benefit cost
  
 
328
 
  389   352       
 
66
 
  61   35 
        
Changes in amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
                              
Net actuarial loss (gain)
  
 
(817
  129   288       
 
(83
  152   99 
Amortization of net actuarial (loss) gain included in
net periodic benefit cost
  
 
(143
  (153  (149      
 
(16
  (13  1 
Prior service cost
  
 
0  
 
  -     283       
 
0  
 
  -     -   
Amortization of prior service cost included in net
periodic benefit cost
  
 
(17
  (14  -         
 
0  
 
  -     -   
Total recorded in other comprehensive income
  
 
(977
  (38  422       
 
(99
  139   100 
Total recorded in net periodic benefit cost and
other comprehensive income,
before-tax
  
 
(649
  351   774       
 
(33
  200   135 
Costs for defined contribution plans, primarily the employee savings plan, were $47$44 million in 2023 (2022 - $43 million, 2021
(2020 - $47 million, 2019 - $43 million).
9
1

91

A summary of the change in accumulated other comprehensive income is shown in the table below:
 Total pension and other
postretirement benefits
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
(Charge) credit to other comprehensive income, before-tax(218)880 1,076 
Deferred income tax (charge) credit (note 17)53 (215)(264)
(Charge) credit to other comprehensive income, after-tax(165)665 812 
   Total pension and other
postretirement benefits
 
millions of Canadian dollars
  
 
2021
 
  2020   2019 
(Charge) credit to other comprehensive income,
before-tax
  
 
1,076
 
  (101  (522
Deferred income tax (charge) credit
(note 17)
  
 
(264
  23   128 
(Charge) credit to other comprehensive income,
after-tax
  
 
812
 
  (78  (394
The company’s investment strategy for pension plan assets reflects a long-term view, a careful assessment of the risks inherent in various asset classesplan assets and liabilities and broad diversification to reduce the risk of the portfolio. Consistent with the long-term nature of the liability, theThe pension plan assets are primarily invested in passive global
market-cap-weighted
indexed equity and domestic indexed bondfixed income index funds to diversify risk while minimizing costs. The balance of the plan assets isfixed income funds are largely invested in high-qualityinvestment grade corporate and government debt securities with interest rate sensitivity designed to approximate the interest rate sensitivity of plan
liabilities
. liabilities. The preferred target asset allocation for the pension plan assets is reviewed periodically and set based on considerations such as risk, diversification liquidity and credit quality of investment.liquidity. The target asset allocation for equity securities is 30 percent with the remainder in fixed-income securities.
The fair value measurement levels are accounting terms that refer to different methods of valuing assets. The terms do not represent the relative risk or credit quality of an investment.
The 20212023 fair value of the pension plan assets, including the level within the fair value hierarchy, is shown in the table below:

 Fair value measurements at December 31, 2023, using:
millions of Canadian dollarsTotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Net Asset
Value
Asset class   
Equity securities   
Canadian  
Non-Canadian2,347 2,347 
Debt securities - Canadian  
Corporate1,193 1,193 
Government4,251 4,251 
Asset backed  
Other5 5 
Equities – Venture capital124 124 
Real Estate93 93 
Cash41 7 34 
Total plan assets at fair value8,054 7   8,047 














92
       Fair value measurements at December 31, 2021, using: 
millions of Canadian dollars
  Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Net Asset
Value
 
Asset class
                         
Equity securities
                         
Canadian
  
 
247
 
                 
 
247
 
Non-Canadian
  
 
2,539
 
                 
 
2,539
 
Debt securities - Canadian
                         
Corporate
  
 
1,496
 
                 
 
1,496
 
Government
  
 
4,865
 
                 
 
4,865
 
Asset backed
  
 
1
 
                 
 
1
 
Equities – Venture capital
  
 
249
 
                 
 
249
 
Cash
  
 
43
 
  
 
36
 
            
 
7
 
Total plan assets at fair value
  
 
9,440
 
  
 
36
 
            
 
9,404
 

9
2
The 2022 fair value of the pension plan assets, including the level within the fair value hierarchy, is shown in the table below:
  Fair value measurements at December 31, 2022, using:
millions of Canadian dollarsTotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3Net Asset
Value
Asset class     
Equity securities     
Canadian96 96 
Non-Canadian2,215 2,215 
Debt securities - Canadian    
Corporate1,156 1,156 
Government3,842 3,842 
Asset backed
Equities – Venture capital199 199 
Cash31 10 21 
Total plan assets at fair value7,541 10   7,531 

The 2020 fair value of the pension plan assets, including the level within the fair value hierarchy, is shown in the table below:
 
 
       Fair value measurements at December 31, 2020, using: 
millions of Canadian dollars  Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Net Asset
Value
 
Asset class
                         
Equity securities
                         
Canadian
   222                   222 
Non-Canadian
   2,690                   2,690 
Debt securities - Canadian
                         
Corporate
   1,426                   1,426 
Government
   4,825                   4,825 
Asset backed
   -                   - 
Equities – Venture capital
   214                   214 
Cash
   49    41              8 
Total plan assets at fair value
   9,426    41              9,385 
A summary of pension plans with accumulated benefit obligation and projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets is shown in the table below:

                   Pension benefits
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 
For funded pension plans with projected benefit
obligation in excess of plan assets:
(a)
  
Projected benefit obligation — 
Fair value of plan assets — 
Projected benefit obligation less fair value of plan assets — 
 
For unfunded pension plans covered by book reserves:  
Projected benefit obligation435 376 
Accumulated benefit obligation395 353 
(a)In 2023 and 2022, the fair value of plan assets exceeded the projected benefit obligation for both the company sponsored plan and its proportionate share of a joint venture sponsored plan.
   Pension benefits 
millions of Canadian dollars
  
2021 
     2020 
For funded pension plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:
(a)
      
Accumulated benefit obligation
  
 
 
     1,034 
Fair value of plan assets
  
 
0
 
     954 
Accumulated benefit obligation less fair value of plan assets
  
 
0
 
     80 
   
For funded pension plans with projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:
 
(b)
            
Projected benefit obligation   
 
1,132 
 
     10,067 
Fair value of plan assets
  
 
1,031 
 
     9,426 
Projected benefit obligation less fair value of plan assets
  
 
101 
 
     641 
   
For unfunded plans covered by book reserves:
            
Projected benefit obligation
  
 
499 
 
     649 
Accumulated benefit obligation
  
 
461 
 
     565 
(a)
The amounts shown for 2020 represent the company’s proportionate share of a joint venture sponsored pension plan. The fair value of plan assets exceeded the accumulated benefit obligation for both the company sponsored plan and its proportionate share of a joint venture sponsored plan in 2021.
(b)
In 2021, projected benefit obligation exceeded the fair value of plan assets only for the company’s proportionate share of a joint venture sponsored pension plan.
Cash flows
Benefit payments expected in:
millions of Canadian dollars
  Pension benefits   Other postretirement
benefits
 millions of Canadian dollarsPension benefitsOther postretirement
benefits
2022
  
 
460
 
  
 
30
 
2023
  
 
460
 
  
 
31
 
2024
  
 
460
 
  
 
31
 
2025
  
 
460
 
  
 
32
 
2026
  
 
460
 
  
 
33
 
2027 - 2031
  
 
2,295
 
  
 
173
 
2027
2028
2029 - 2033
In 2022,2024, the company expects to make cash contributions of about $204$150 million to its pension plans.

9
3
93

Table of Contents
5.    Other long-term obligations
millions of Canadian dollars    
2021
     2020 
Employee retirement benefits
(a)
(note 4)
    
 
1,362
 
     2,105 
Asset retirement obligations and other environmental liabilities
(b) (c)
    
 
1,713
 
     1,676 
Share-based incentive compensation liabilities
(note 7)
    
 
79
 
     45 
Operating lease liability
(note 13)
    
 
147
 
     95 
Other obligations
    
 
596
 
     179 
Total other long-term obligations    
 
3,897
 
     4,100 
(a)
Total recorded employee retirement benefits obligations also included $56 million in current liabilities (2020 – $58 million).
(b)
Total asset retirement obligations and other environmental liabilities also included $102 million in current liabilities (2020 – $100 million).
(c)
For 2021, the asset retirement obligations were discounted at 6 percent (2020 - 6 percent). Asset retirement obligations incurred in the current period were
l
evel 3 fair value measurements.
The following table summarizes the activity in the liability for asset retirement obligations:
millions of Canadian dollars  
2021
     2020     2019 
Balance as at January 1
  
 
1,674
 
     1,400      1,417 
Additions (deductions)
  
 
6
 
     265      (23
Accretion
  
 
99
 
     82      80 
Settlement
  
 
(58
     (73     (74
Balance as at December 31
  
 
1,721
 
     1,674      1,400 
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 
Employee retirement benefits (a) (note 4)
954 902 
Asset retirement obligations and other environmental liabilities (b) (c)
2,564 2,150 
Share-based incentive compensation liabilities (note 7)
90 101 
Operating lease liability (note 13)
111 151 
Other obligations132 163 
Total other long-term obligations3,851 3,467 
(a)Total recorded employee retirement benefits obligations also included $62 million in current liabilities (2022 – $63 million).
(b)Total asset retirement obligations and other environmental liabilities also included $235 million in current liabilities (2022 – $116 million).
(c)For 2023, the asset retirement obligations were discounted at 6 percent (2022 - 6 percent). Asset retirement obligations incurred in the current period were level 3 fair value measurements.

The following table summarizes the activity in the liability for asset retirement obligations:
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Balance as at January 12,178 1,721 1,674 
Additions (deductions)471 415 
Accretion132 101 99 
Settlement(78)(59)(58)
Balance as at December 312,703 2,178 1,721 
Estimated cash payments for asset retirement obligations are $77$169 million in 20222024 and $64$162 million in 2023.
2025.
9
4
94

Table of Contents
6.    Financial and derivative instruments
Financial instruments
The fair value of the company’s financial instruments is determined by reference to various market data and other appropriate valuation techniques. There are no material differences between the fair value of the company’s financial instruments and the recorded carrying value. At December 31, 20212023 and December 31, 2020,2022, the fair value of long-term debt ($4,4473,447 million, excluding finance lease obligations) was primarily a level 2 measurement.
Derivative instruments
The company’s size, strong capital structure and the complementary nature of the Upstream, Downstream and Chemical businessesits business segments reduce the company’s enterprise-wide risk from changes in commodity prices, currency rates and currency exchangeinterest rates. In addition, the company uses commodity-based contracts, including derivative instrumentsderivatives, to manage commodity price risk and for trading purposes.to generate returns from trading. Commodity contracts held for trading purposes are presented in the Consolidated statement of income on a net basis in the line “Revenues”"Revenues" and in the Consolidated statement of cash flows in "Cash flows from (used in) operating activities". The company doescompany’s commodity derivatives are not designate derivative instruments as aaccounted for under hedge for hedge accounting purposes.accounting.
Credit risk associated with the company’s derivative position is mitigated by several factors, including the use of derivative clearing exchanges and the quality of and financial limits placed on derivative counterparties. The company maintains a system of controls that includes the authorization, reporting and monitoring of derivative activity.
At December 31, the net notional long / (short) position of derivative instruments was:

thousands of barrels
           
2021 
 2020
Crude
     
7,390 
    (800)Crude(4,450)1,800
Products
     
(560)
    (390)
Realized and unrealized gain or (loss) on derivative instruments recognized in the Consolidated statement of income is included in the following lines on a
before-tax
basis:
millions of Canadian dollars
    
2021
    2020    2019
Revenues
    
(46) 
    (13)     (3) 
Purchases of crude oil and products
    
(33) 
    (21)     (7) 
Total
    
(79) 
    (34)     (10) 

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Revenues(5)148 (46)
Purchases of crude oil and products — (33)
Total(5)148 (79)
The estimated fair value of derivative instruments, and the related hierarchy level for the fair value measurement iswere as follows:

At December 31, 2023
millions of Canadian dollars
 Fair valueEffect of
counterparty
netting
Effect of
collateral
netting
Net
carrying
value
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets
     Derivative assets (a)
28 18  46 (16)(12)18 
 
Liabilities
     Derivative liabilities (b)
16 31  47 (16) 31 
(a)Included in the Consolidated balance sheet line: “Materials, supplies and prepaid expenses”, “Accounts receivable - net” and “Other assets, including intangibles - net”.
(b)Included in the Consolidated balance sheet line: “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” and “Other long-term obligations”.
95
At December 31, 2021
millions of Canadian dollars
                                
   Fair value   
Effect of
counterparty
netting
  Effect of
collateral
netting
  Net
carrying
value

    Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
Assets
            
Derivative assets
(a)
  
 
24
 
  
 
17
 
  
 
0
 
  
 
41
 
  
 
(31
 
 
0
 
 
 
10

       
Liabilities
                                
Derivative liabilities
(b)
  
 
31
 
  
 
12
 
  
 
0
 
  
 
43
 
  
 
(31
 
 
(7
 
 
5


(a)  Included in the Consolidated balance sheet line: “Materials, supplies and prepaid expenses”, “Accounts receivable - net” and “Other assets, including intangibles - net”.
(b)  Included in the Consolidated balance sheet line: “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” and “Other long-term obligations”.

9
5
At December 31, 2022
millions of Canadian dollars
Fair valueEffect of
counterparty
netting
Effect of
collateral
netting
Net
carrying
value
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets       
Derivative assets (a)
17 32 — 49 (27)— 22 
 
Liabilities
Derivative liabilities (b)
21 20 — 41 (27)(4)10 
(a)Included in the Consolidated balance sheet line: “Materials, supplies and prepaid expenses”, “Accounts receivable - net” and “Other assets, including intangibles - net”.
(b)Included in the Consolidated balance sheet line: “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” and “Other long-term obligations”.

At December 31, 2020                          
millions of Canadian dollars                                 
   Fair value   
Effect of
counterparty
netting
  
Effect of
collateral
netting
  
Net
carrying
value
 
    Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
Assets
                                 
Derivative assets
(a)
   2    -    -    2    (2  -   - 
        
Liabilities
                                 
Derivative liabilities
(b)
   12    -    -    12    (2  (10  - 
(a)
Included in the Consolidated balance sheet line: “Materials, supplies and prepaid expenses”, “Accounts receivable - net” and “Other assets, including intangibles - net”.
(b)
Included in the Consolidated balance sheet line: “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” and “Other long-term obligations”.
At December 31, 20212023, and December 31, 2020,2022, the company had $6$24 million and $5$14 million, respectively, of collateral under a master netting arrangement not offset against the derivatives on the Consolidated balance sheet in “Accounts"Accounts receivable - net”net", primarily related to initial margin requirements.
9
6
96

Table of Contents
7.    Share-based incentive compensation programs
Share-based incentive compensation programs are designed to retain selected employees, reward them for high performance and promote individual contribution to sustained improvement in the company’s future business performance and shareholder value over the long-term. The nonemployee directors also participate in share-based incentive compensation programs.
Restricted stock units and deferred share units
Under the restricted stock unit plan, each unit entitles the recipient to the conditional right to receive from the company, upon vesting, an amount equal to the value of one common share of the company, based on the five-day average of the closing price of the company’s common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange on and immediately prior to the vesting dates. For the majority of the units, fifty50 percent of the units vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, and the remainder vest on the seventh anniversary of the grant date. Some management, professional, and technical participants will receive awards granted that vest 100 percent after three years. The company may also issue units to the chairman, president and chief executive officer where 50 percent of the units vest on the fifth anniversary of the grant date and the remainder vest on the tenth anniversary of the grant date, except that for awards granted prior to 2021,2020, the vesting of the tenth anniversary portion is delayed until retirement if later than 10 years.
The deferred share unit plan is made available to nonemployee directors. The nonemployee directors can elect to receive all or part of their eligible directors’ fees in units. The number of units granted is determined at the end of each calendar quarter by dividing the dollar amount of the nonemployee director’s fees for that calendar quarter elected to be received as deferred share units by the average closing price of the company’s shares for the five consecutive trading days (“("average closing price”price") immediately prior to the last day of the calendar quarter. Additional units are granted to represent dividends on unexercised units, and are calculated by dividing the cash dividend payable on the company’s shares by the average closing price immediately prior to the payment date for that dividend and multiplying the resulting number by the number of deferred share units held by the recipient, as adjusted for any share splits. Deferred share units cannot be exercised until after termination of service as a director, including termination due to death, and must be exercised in their entirety in one election no later than December 31 of the year following the year of termination of service. On the exercise date, the cash value to be received for the units is determined based on the company’s average closing price immediately prior to the date of exercise, as adjusted for any share splits.
All units require settlement by cash payments with the following exceptions. The restricted stock unit program provides that, for units granted to Canadian residents, the recipient may receive one common share of the company per unit or elect to receive the cash payment for the units that vest on the seventh year anniversary of the grant date. For units where 50 percent vest on the fifth anniversary of the grant date and the remainder vest on the tenth anniversary of grant, the recipient may receive one common share of the company per unit or elect to receive cash payment for all that vest.
The company accounts for all units by using the fair-value-based method. The fair value of awards in the form of restricted stock and deferred share units is the market price of the company’s stock. Under this method, compensation expense related to the units of these programs is measured each reporting period based on the company’s current stock price and is recorded in the Consolidated statement of income over the requisite service period of each award.
The following table summarizes information about these units for the year ended December 31, 2021:
    Restricted
stock units
  Deferred
share units
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2021
  
 
4,463,320
 
 
 
147,405
 
Granted
  
 
681,520
 
 
 
19,260
 
Vested / Exercised
  
 
(1,021,865
 
 
0
 
Forfeited and cancelled
  
 
(172,360
 
 
0
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2021
  
 
3,950,615
 
 
 
166,665
 
2023:

9
7
 Restricted
 stock units
Deferred
 share units
Outstanding at January 1, 20234,036,355 179,884 
Granted949,520 12,219 
Vested / Exercised(651,175)(154,781)
Forfeited and cancelled(421,390) 
Outstanding at December 31, 20233,913,31037,322

97

In 2021,2023, the before-tax compensation expense charged against income for these programs the restricted stock units and deferred share units was $96$52 million (2020(2022 - $2$103 million, benefit, 20192021 - $34 million expense)$89 million). Income tax expense associated withbenefit recognized in income related to this compensation programsexpense for the year was $23$13 million (2020(2022 - $0$25 million, 20192021 - $9 million benefit)$22 million). Cash payments of $52$68 million were made for these programsrelated to this compensation expense in 2023 (2022 - $65 million, 2021 (2020 - $33 million, 2019 - $50$48 million).
As of December 31, 2021,2023, there was $80$169 million of total before-tax unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock units based on the company’s share price at the end of the current reporting period. The weighted averageweighted-average vesting period of non-vested restricted stock units is 4.04.1 years. All units under the deferred share programs have vested as of December 31, 2021.
2023.
8.    Investment and other income
Investment and other income includes gains and losses on asset sales as follows:

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Proceeds from asset sales86 904 81 
Book value of asset sales13 746 32 
Gain (loss) on asset sales, before tax (a)73 158 49 
Gain (loss) on asset sales, after tax (a)63 241 43 
(a)2022 included a gain of $116 million ($208 million, after tax) from the sale of interests in XTO Energy Canada, which included the removal of a deferred tax liability.
millions of Canadian dollars    
2021
     2020     2019 
Proceeds from asset sales
    
 
81
 
     82      82 
Book value of asset sales
    
 
32
 
     47      36 
Gain (loss) on asset sales, before-tax
    
 
49
 
     35      46 
Gain (loss) on asset sales, after-tax
    
 
43
 
     32      42 
9.    Litigation and other contingencies
A variety of claims have been made against Imperialthe company and its subsidiaries in a number of lawsuits.
Management has regular litigation reviews, including updates from corporate and outside counsel to assess the need for accounting recognition or disclosure of these contingencies. The company accrues an undiscounted liability for those contingencies where the incurrence of a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If a range of amounts can be reasonably estimated and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, then the minimum of the range is accrued. The company does not record liabilities when the likelihood that the liability has been incurred is probable but the amount cannot be reasonably estimated or when the liability is believed to be only reasonably possible or remote. For contingencies where an unfavourable outcome is reasonably possible and which are significant, the company discloses the nature of the contingency and, where feasible, an estimate of the possible loss. For purposes of the company’s contingency disclosures, “significant”"significant" includes material matters, as well as other matters which management believes should be disclosed. Based on a consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances, the company does not believe the ultimate outcome of any currently pending lawsuits against the company will have a material adverse effect on the company’s operations, financial condition, or financial statements taken as a whole.
Additionally, the company has other commitments arising in the normal course of business for operating and capital needs, all of which are expected to be fulfilled with no adverse consequences material to the company’s operations or financial condition. Unconditional purchase obligations, as defined by accounting standards, are those long-term commitments that are non-cancelablenon-cancellable or cancelablecancellable only under certain conditions and that third parties have used to secure financing for the facilities that will provide the contracted goods and services. The company has 0tnot entered into any unconditional purchase obligations.
As a result of the completed sale of Imperial’sthe remaining company-owned Esso retail sites, the company was contingently liable at December 31, 2021,2023, for guarantees relating to performance under contracts of other third-party obligations totalling $21$13 million (2020(2022 - $26$17 million).



At March 31, 2021, due to the termination of transportation services agreements related to a third-party pipeline project, the company recognized a liability of $62 million, previously reported as a contingent liability.
9
8
98

Table of Contents
10. Common shares
At December 31
thousands of shares2023 2022 
Authorized1,100,000 1,100,000 
Outstanding535,837 584,153 
At December 31
thousands of shares
          
  
2021
     2020 
Authorized
  
 
1,100,000
 
     1,100,000 
Common shares outstanding
  
 
678,080
 
     734,077 
The most recent 12-month normal course issuer bid program came into effect June 29, 2021,2023, under which Imperial continued its existing share purchase program. The program enabled the company to purchase up to a maximum of 35,583,67129,207,635 common shares (5 percent of the total shares on June 15, 2021)2023) which included shares purchased under the normal course issuer bid and from Exxon Mobil Corporation concurrent with, but outside of the normal course issuer bid. As in the past, Exxon Mobil Corporation advised the company that it intended to participate to maintain its ownership percentage at approximately 69.6 percent. Subsequent to December 31, 2021, theThe program completed on January 31, 2022October 19, 2023 as a result of the company purchasing the maximum allowable number of shares under the program.
On November 3, 2023, the company commenced a substantial issuer bid pursuant to which it offered to purchase for cancellation up to $1.5 billion of its common shares through a modified Dutch auction and proportionate tender offer. The substantial issuer bid was completed on December 13, 2023, with the company taking up and paying for19,108,280 common shares at a price of $78.50 per share, for an aggregate purchase of $1.5 billion and 3.4 percent of Imperial’s issued and outstanding shares at the close of business on October 30, 2023. This included13,299,349 shares purchased from Exxon Mobil Corporation by way of a proportionate tender to maintain its ownership percentage at approximately 69.6 percent.
The excess of the purchase cost over the stated value of shares purchased has been recorded as a distribution of earnings reinvested.
The company’s common share activities are summarized below:

 Thousands of
 shares
Millions of
 dollars
Balance as at January 1, 2021734,077 1,357 
Issued under employee share-based awards— 
Purchases at stated value(56,004)(105)
Balance as at December 31, 2021678,080 1,252 
Issued under employee share-based awards— — 
Purchases at stated value(93,927)(173)
Balance as at December 31, 2022584,153 1,079 
Issued under employee share-based awards— — 
Purchases at stated value(48,316)(87)
Balance as at December 31, 2023535,837992












99
    Thousands of
shares
  Millions of
dollars
 
Balance as at January 1, 2019
   782,565   1,446 
Issued under employee share-based awards
   1   0 
Purchases at stated value
   (38,664  (71
Balance as at December 31, 2019
   743,902   1,375 
Issued under employee share-based awards
   7   - 
Purchases at stated value
   (9,832  (18
Balance as at December 31, 2020
   734,077   1,357 
Issued under employee share-based awards
   7   0 
Purchases at stated value
   (56,004  (105
Balance as at December 31, 2021
  
 
678,080
 
 
 
1,252
 

The following table provides the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share and the dividends declared by the company on its outstanding common shares:

 2023 2022 2021 
Net income (loss) per common share – basic   
Net income (loss) (millions of Canadian dollars)
4,889 7,340 2,479 
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (millions of shares)
574.8 640.2 711.6 
Net income (loss) per common share (dollars)
8.51 11.47 3.48 
 
Net income (loss) per common share – diluted   
Net income (loss) (millions of Canadian dollars)
4,889 7,340 2,479 
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (millions of shares)
574.8 640.2 711.6 
Effect of employee share-based awards (millions of shares)
1.1 1.3 1.6 
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding,
        assuming dilution (millions of shares)
575.9 641.5 713.2 
Net income (loss) per common share (dollars)
8.49 11.44 3.48 
 
Dividends per common share – declared (dollars)
1.94 1.46 1.03 
      
2021
     2020     2019 
Net income (loss) per common share – basic
                     
Net income (loss)
(millions of Canadian dollars)
    
 
2,479
 
     (1,857     2,200 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
(millions of shares)
    
 
711.6
 
     735.3      762.7 
Net income (loss) per common share
(dollars)
    
 
3.48
 
     (2.53     2.88 
    
Net income (loss) per common share – diluted
                     
Net income (loss)
(millions of Canadian dollars)
    
 
2,479
 
     (1,857     2,200 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
(millions of shares)
    
 
711.6
 
     735.3      762.7 
Effect of employee share-based awards
(millions of shares)
(a)
    
 
1.6
 
     -      2.3 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, assuming dilution
(millions of shares)
    
 
713.2
 
     735.3      765.0 
Net income (loss) per common share
(dollars)
    
 
3.48
 
     (2.53     2.88 
    
Dividends per common share – declared
(dollars)
    
 
1.03
 
     0.88      0.85 
(a)
For 2020, the Net income (loss) per common share – diluted excludes the effect of 1.9 million employee share-based awards. Share-based awards have the potential to dilute basic earnings per share in the future.
9
9
100

Table of Contents
11. Miscellaneous financial information
LIFO inventory
In 2021,2023, net income included an after-tax lossgain of $13$5 million (2020(2022$19$62 million loss, 2019gain, 2021$22$13 million loss) attributable to the effect of changes in last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventories. The replacement cost of inventories was estimated to exceed their LIFO carrying values at December 31, 20212023 by about $1.8$2.2 billion (2020(2022$0.8$2.0 billion). Inventories of crude oil and products at year-end consisted of the following:

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 
Crude oil979 809 
Petroleum products579 471 
Chemical products66 76 
Other320 158 
Total1,944 1,514 
millions of Canadian dollars  
2021
     2020 
Crude oil
  
 
674
 
     630 
Petroleum products
  
 
310
 
     403 
Chemical products
  
 
73
 
     55 
Other
  
 
45
 
     73 
Total
  
 
1,102
 
     1,161 
In 2021, the company recorded an unfavourable $74 million ($82
million, before tax) inventory adjustment (including the proportionate share of LIFO changes) related to reconciliations of additives and products inventory at equity and third-party terminal
s
.terminals. The out-of-period impact of $57 million ($63 million, before tax) occurred over a number of years, and has been resolved.
The company has determined that the adjustment iswas not material to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021, or any of the prior periods related to the adjustment. Accordingly, comparative periods presented in the consolidated financial statements have not been restated.
Research and development
Research expenditures are mainly spent on developing technologies to improve bitumen recovery, reduce costs and reduce the environmental impact of upstream operations, including technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions intensity, supporting environmental and process improvements in the refineries, as well as accessing ExxonMobil’s research worldwide.
The company has scientific research agreements with affiliates of ExxonMobil, which provide for technical and engineering work to be performed by all parties, the exchange of technical information and the assignment and licencinglicensing of patents, and patent rights. These agreements provide mutual access to scientific and operating data related to nearly every phase of the petroleum and petrochemical operations of the parties.
Net research and development costs charged to expenses in 2023 were $84 million (2022 – $74 million, 2021 were $89 million (2020 – $105 million, 2019 – $133 million). These costs are included in expenses due to the uncertainty of future benefits.
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
“Accounts payable and accrued liabilities” included accrued taxes other than income taxes of $415$455 million at December 31, 2021

2023 (2022 – $458 million) and other miscellaneous current liabilities of $726 million at December 31, 2023.
(2020 – $344 million)Government assistance
In 2022, the company prospectively adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s standard,
Government Assistance (Topic 832).
The standard requires the annual disclosure of certain types of government assistance not otherwise covered by authoritative accounting guidance. The company has received subsidies as partreceives allowances from governments in the form of the Government of Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan, which included the company’s proportionate share of a joint venture. It was recognizedemission credits as a reduction to expense (2020 – $155 million before tax)result of performing better than facility level expectations for emission targets and was includedrecords these at a nominal amount in the Consolidated statement of income, primarily as part of “Production and manufacturing”.
In the first quarter of 2020, with the change in economic conditions and the reduction in the company’s market capitalization, the company assessed its goodwill balances for impairment and recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $20 million in the company’s Upstream segment. The goodwill impairment is reflected in “Depreciation and depletion” on the Consolidated statement of income and “Goodwill” on the Consolidated balance sheet. The remaining balance of goodwill is associated withDuring 2022 and 2023, government assistance was immaterial to the Downstream segment.
company’s financial results.
1
00
101

Table of Contents
12. Financing and additional notes and loans payable information
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Debt-related interest (a)
203 111 63 
Capitalized interest(141)(57)(24)
Net interest expense62 54 39 
Other interest7 15 
Total financing (b)
69 60 54 
(a)Includes related party interest with ExxonMobil.
(b)The weighted-average interest rate on short-term borrowings in 2023 was 4.9 percent (2022 – 2.0 percent, 2021 – 0.2 percent) and on long-term borrowings, with ExxonMobil, in 2023 was 4.9 percent (2022 – 1.9 percent, 2021 – 0.6 percent).

millions of Canadian dollars    
2021
     
2020
     2019 
Debt-related interest
(a)
    
 
63
 
     102      138 
Capitalized interest
    
 
(24
     (41     (48
Net interest expense
    
 
39
 
     61      90 
Other interest
    
 
15
 
     3      3 
Total financing
(b)
    
 
54
 
     64      93 
(a)
Includes related party interest with ExxonMobil.
(b)
The weighted average interest rate on short-term borrowings in 2021 was 0.2 percent (2020 – 0.8 percent, 2019 – 1.8 percent). Average effective rate on the long-term borrowings with ExxonMobil in 2021 was 0.6 percent (2020 – 1.4 percent, 2019 – 2.2 percent).
During the secondfourth quarter of 2021,2023, the company extended the maturity date of twodates of its short-term lines of credit, totalling $750 million, to May 2023, these facilities are now long-term. The company also extended its $300 million committed short-term line of credit to June 2022. In November 2021, the company extended the maturity date of antwo existing $250 million committed short-term linelines of credit to November 2022. 2024 and November 2025 respectively.

The company has 0tnot drawn on theseany of its outstanding $500 million of available credit facilities.
In 2021, the company repaid the $111 million outstanding balance and terminated the non-interest bearing, revolving demand loan under an arrangement with an affiliate company of ExxonMobil.
10
1
102

Table of Contents
13. Leases

The company generally purchases the property, plant and equipment used in operations, but there are situations where assets are leased, primarily storage tanks, rail cars, marine vessels and transportation facilities. Right of use assets and lease liabilities are established on the balance sheet for leases with an expected term greater than one year, by discounting the amounts fixed in the lease agreement for the duration of the lease which is reasonably certain, considering the probability of exercising any early termination and extension options. The portion of the fixed payment related to service costs for tankers and finance leases is excluded from the calculation of right of use assets and lease liabilities. Usually, assets are leased only for a portion of their useful lives and are accounted for as operating leases. In limited situations, assets are leased for nearly all of their useful lives and are accounted for as finance leases. In general, leases are capitalized using the company’s incremental borrowing rate.
Variable payments under these lease agreements are not significant. Residual value guarantees, restrictions, or covenants related to leases, and transactions with related parties are also not significant. The company’s activities as a lessor are not material.
The table below summarizes the total lease cost incurred:

 202320222021
millions of Canadian dollarsOperating leasesFinance
 leases
Operating leasesFinance
 leases
Operating leasesFinance
 leases
Operating lease cost114 119 123 
Short-term and other (net of sublease rental income)30 40 19 
 
Amortization of right of use assets19 19 17 
Interest on lease liabilities29 30 33 
Total lease cost144 48 159 49 142 50 
   
2021
   2020   2019 
       
millions of Canadian dollars  Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
   Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
   Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
 
Operating lease cost
  
 
123
 
        157         151      
Short-term and other (net of sublease rental income)
  
 
19
 
        40         76      
       
Amortization of right of use assets
       
 
17
 
        29         55 
Interest on lease liabilities
       
 
33
 
        38         40 
Total lease cost
  
 
142
 
  
 
50
 
   197    67    227    95 
The following table summarizes the amounts related to operating leases and finance leases recorded on the Consolidated balance sheet, weighted averageweighted-average remaining lease term and weighted averageweighted-average discount rates applied at December 31:

  
2021
   2020  20232022
 
millions of Canadian dollars  Operating
leases
   Finance
leases 
(a)
   Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
 
millions of Canadian dollars
millions of Canadian dollarsOperating
 leases
Finance
 leases
Operating
 leases
Finance
 leases
Right of use assets
            Right of use assets 
Included in Other assets, including intangibles - net
  
 
245
 
      188    
Included in Property, plant and equipment, less
Included in Property, plant and equipment, less
Included in Property, plant and equipment, less
     
 
637
 
      532 
accumulated depreciation and depletion
            accumulated depreciation and depletion 
Total right of use assets
  
 
245
 
  
 
637
 
   188    532 
 
Lease liability due within one year
            
Lease liability due within one year
Lease liability due within one year 
Included in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
  
 
102
 
  
 
0
 
   97    - 
Included in Notes and loans payable
     
 
22
 
      16 
Long-term lease liability
            
Long-term lease liabilityLong-term lease liability 
Included in Other long-term obligations
  
 
147
 
  
 
0
 
   95    - 
Included in Long-term debt
     
 
607
 
      510 
Total lease liability
  
 
249
 
  
 
629
 
   192    526 
 
Weighted average remaining lease term
(years)
  
 
4
 
  
 
38
 
   4    38 
Weighted average discount rate
(percent)
  
 
1.2
 
  
 
4.8
 
   2.5    7.3 
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)
636537
Weighted-average discount rate (percent)
Weighted-average discount rate (percent)
1.94.71.14.7
(a)  The change in finance leases was due to a finance lease modification and re-measurement.
10
2

103

The maturity analysis of the company’s lease liabilities as at December 31 are summarized below:

 2023
 
millions of Canadian dollarsOperating
 leases
Finance
 leases
Maturity analysis of lease liabilities 
202490 49 
202538 46 
202616 44 
202710 43 
20289 42 
2029 and beyond46 858 
Total lease payments209 1,082 
 
Discount to present value(11)(497)
Total lease liability198 585 
   
2021
 
   
millions of Canadian dollars  Operating
leases
  Finance
leases
 
Maturity analysis of lease liabilities
         
2022
  
 
104
 
 
 
52
 
2023
  
 
65
 
 
 
50
 
2024
  
 
44
 
 
 
49
 
2025
  
 
6
 
 
 
46
 
2026
  
 
5
 
 
 
44
 
2027 and beyond
  
 
36
 
 
 
942
 
Total lease payments
  
 
260
 
 
 
1,183
 
   
Discount to present value
  
 
(11
 
 
(554
Total lease liability
  
 
249
 
 
 
629
 
In addition to the operating lease liabilities in the table immediately above, at December 31, 2021,2023, additional undiscounted commitments for leases not yet commenced totalled $5$54 million (2020(2022 - $27$14 million).
Estimated cash payments for operating and finance leases not yet commenced are $
2
$1 million in both 20222024 and 2023.$48 million in 2025.
The table below summarizes the cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities and the right of use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities:

 202320222021
 
millions of Canadian dollarsOperating
 leases
Finance
 leases
Operating
 leases
Finance
 leases
Operating
 leases
Finance
 leases
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities      
Cash flows from operating activities56  121 — 122 — 
Cash flows from financing activities 22  22  20 
 
Non-cash right of use assets recorded for lease liabilities      
In exchange for lease liabilities during the year61  117 — 176 123 

   
2021
   2020   2019 
       
millions of Canadian dollars  Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
   Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
   Operating
leases
   Finance
leases
 
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of
lease liabilities
                              
Cash flows from operating activities
  
 
122
 
  
 
0
 
   136    15    147    45 
Cash flows from financing activities
       
 
20
 
        20         27 
       
Non-cash right of use assets recorded for lease liabilities
                              
For January 1 adoption of
Leases (Topic 842)
                       298      
In exchange for lease liabilities during the year
  
 
176
 
  
 
123
 
   63    14    104    - 
10
3
104

Table of Contents
14. Long-term debt
At December 31
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 
Long-term debt (a) (b)
3,447 3,447 
Finance leases (c)
564 586 
Total long-term debt4,011 4,033 
(a)Borrowed under an existing agreement with an affiliated company of ExxonMobil that provides for a long-term, variable-rate, Canadian dollar loan from ExxonMobil to the company of up to $7.75 billion at interest equivalent to Canadian market rates. The agreement is effective until June 30, 2025, cancellable if ExxonMobil provides at least 370 days advance written notice.
(b)During the third quarter of 2022, the company decreased its long-term debt by $1 billion, partially repaying an existing facility with an affiliated company of ExxonMobil.
(c)Finance leases are primarily associated with transportation facilities and services agreements. The average imputed interest rate was 4.7 percent in 2023 (2022 – 4.7 percent). Total finance lease obligations also include $21 million in current liabilities (2022 - $22 million). Principal payments on finance leases of approximately $18 million on average per year are due in each of the next four years after December 31, 2024.
At December 31
       
 
            
 
     
millions of Canadian dollars
  
 
2021
 
        2020 
Long-term debt
(a)
  
 
4,447
 
        4,447 
Finance leases
(b)
  
 
607
 
        510 
Total long-term debt
  
 
5,054
 
        4,957 
(a)
Borrowed under an existing agreement with an affiliated company of ExxonMobil that provides for a long-term, variable-rate, Canadian dollar loan from ExxonMobil to the company of up to $7.75 billion at interest equivalent to Canadian market rates. The agreement is effective until June 30, 2025, cancelable if ExxonMobil provides at least 370 days advance written notice.
(b)
Finance leases are primarily associated with transportation facilities and services agreements. The average imputed rate was 4.8 percent in 2021 (2020 – 7.3 percent). Total finance lease obligations also include $22 million in current liabilities (2020 - $16 million). Principal payments on finance leases of approximately $20 million on average per year are due in each of the next four years after December 31, 2022.
15. Accounting for suspended exploratory well costs
The company continues capitalization of exploratory well costs when the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well and the company is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. The term “project” as used in this report can refer to a variety of different activities and does not necessarily have the same meaning as in any government payment transparency reports. At December 31, 2021 theThe company had 0capitalizedno capitalized suspended exploratory well costs (2020 - $0 million, 2019 - $0 million).as at December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
Exploration activity often involves drilling multiple wells, over a number of years, to fully evaluate a project. At December 31, 2021 theThe company had 0projectsno projects with exploratory wells costs capitalized (2020 - 0, 2019 - 0
)
.
as at December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
10
4
105

16. Transactions with related parties
Revenues and expenses of the company also include the results of transactions with affiliated companies of ExxonMobil in the normal course of operations. These were conducted on terms comparable to those which would have been conducted with unrelated parties and primarily consisted of the purchase and sale of crude oil, natural gas, petroleum and chemical products, as well as technical, engineering and research and development costs. Transactions with ExxonMobil also included amounts paid and received in connection with the company’s participation in a number of upstream activities conducted jointly in Canada.
In addition, the company has existing agreements with ExxonMobil:

a) 
To provide computer and customer support services to the company and to share common business and operational support services that allow the companies to consolidate duplicate work and systems;
a)To provide computer and customer support services to the company and to share common business and operational support services that allow the companies to consolidate duplicate work and systems;
b) 
To operate certain western Canada production properties owned by ExxonMobil, as well as provide for the delivery of management, business and technical services to ExxonMobil in Canada. These agreements are designed to provide organizational efficiencies and to reduce costs. No separate legal entities were created from these arrangements. Separate books of account continue to be maintained for the company and ExxonMobil. The company and ExxonMobil retain ownership of their respective assets, and there is no impact on operations or reserves;
b)To operate certain western Canada production properties owned by ExxonMobil, as well as provide for the delivery of management, business and technical services to ExxonMobil in Canada. These agreements are designed to provide organizational efficiencies and to reduce costs. No separate legal entities were created from these arrangements. Separate books of account continue to be maintained for the company and ExxonMobil. The company and ExxonMobil retain ownership of their respective assets, and there is no impact on operations or reserves;
c) 
To provide for the option of equal participation in new upstream opportunities; and
c)To provide for the option of equal participation in new upstream opportunities; and
d)To enter into derivative agreements on each other’s behalf.
d) 
To enter into derivative agreements on each other’s behalf.
The company had an existing agreement with ExxonMobil to provide for the delivery of management, business and technical services to Syncrude Canada Ltd. by ExxonMobil, which was terminated in connection with the transfer of operatorship of Syncrude on September 30, 2021.
Certain charges from ExxonMobil have been capitalized; they are not material in the aggregate.
The amounts of purchases and revenues by Imperial in 2021,2023, with ExxonMobil, were $2,669$4,026 million and $8,777$13,544 million respectively
(2020
(2022 - $2,424$3,719 million and $5,101$17,042 million respectively).
As at December 31, 2021,2023, the company had an outstanding long-term loansloan of $4,447$3,447 million (2020(2022$4,447$3,447 million) and short-term loans of
$0 million (2020 – $111 million)
from ExxonMobil (see note 14, Long-term debt, on page 104"Long-term debt", and note 12, Financing"Financing and additional notes
and loans payable information, on page 101information" for further details). The amount of financing costs with ExxonMobil were
$28 $169 million
(2020
(2022 - $61$78 million).
Imperial has other related party transactions not detailed above in note 16, as they are not significant.
10
5
106

Table of Contents
17. Other comprehensive income (loss) information
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Balance at January 1(512)(1,177)(1,989)
Postretirement benefits liability adjustment:   
Current period change excluding amounts reclassified
       from accumulated other comprehensive income
(206)582 679 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income41 83 133 
Balance at December 31(677)(512)(1,177)
millions of Canadian dollars  
        2021
          2020          2019 
Balance at January 1
  
 
(1,989
  (1,911  (1,517
Postretirement benefits liability adjustment:
             
Current period change excluding amounts
reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
  
 
679
 
  (212  (505
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
  
 
133
 
  134   111 
Balance at December 31
  
 
(1,177
  (1,989  (1,911
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) - before-tax income (expense):

millions of Canadian dollars  
        2021
         2020         2019 
Amortization of postretirement benefits liability adjustment included in net periodic benefit cost
(a)
  
 
(176
  (180  (148
Amortization of postretirement benefits liability adjustment
included in net benefit cost (a)
(a) This accumulated other comprehensive income component is included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost (note 4).(a) This accumulated other comprehensive income component is included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost (note 4).
(a)  This accumulated other comprehensive income component is included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost (note 4).
Income tax expense (credit) for components of other comprehensive income (loss):

millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Postretirement benefits liability adjustments:  
Postretirement benefits liability adjustment (excluding amortization)(66)188 221 
Amortization of postretirement benefits liability adjustment
       included in net benefit cost
13 27 43 
Total(53)215 264 
18. Divestment activities

millions of Canadian dollars  
        2021
          2020          2019 
Postretirement benefits liability adjustments:
              
Postretirement benefits liability adjustment (excluding amortization)
  
 
221
 
 
   (69  (165
Amortization of postretirement benefits liability adjustment included in net periodic benefit cost
  
 
43
 
   46   37 
Total
  
 
264
 
   (23  (128
Jointly with ExxonMobil Canada, Imperial signed an agreement in the second quarter of 2022 with Whitecap Resources Inc.for the sale of its interests in XTO Energy Canada which included assets in the Montney and Duvernay areas of central Alberta,for total cash consideration of approximately $1.9 billion ($0.9 billion Imperial's share). The transaction closed on August 31, 2022 and the company recognized a gain of approximately $0.2 billion, after tax. Imperial’s total assets associated with this transaction included about $0.9 billion (about $0.8 billion of property, plant and equipment) and about $0.2 billion total liabilities in the Upstream segment.
10
6
107

Supplemental information on oil and gas exploration and production activities
(unaudited)
The information on pages 107108 to 108109 excludes items not related to oil and natural gas extraction, such as administrative and general expenses, pipeline operations, gas plant processing fees and gains or losses on asset sales. The company’s 25 percent interest in proved synthetic crude oil reserves in the Syncrude joint-venture is included as part of the company’s total proved oil and gas reserves and in the calculation of the standardized measure of discounted future cash flows, in accordance with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board rules. Results of operations, costs incurred in property acquisitions, exploration and development activities, and capitalized costs include the company’s share of Kearl, Syncrude and other unproved mineable acreages in the following tables.
Results of operations
millions of Canadian dollars
  
 
        2021
 
           2020           2019 
Sales to customers
(a)
  
 
5,081
 
   2,066   3,927 
Intersegment sales
(a) (b)
  
 
3,037
 
   1,777   2,627 
  
 
8,118
 
   3,843   6,554 
Production expenses
  
 
4,728
 
   3,977   4,467 
Exploration expenses
  
 
32
 
   13   47 
Depreciation and depletion (includes impairments)
  
 
1,579
 
   2,857   1,266 
Income taxes
  
 
457
 
   (678  (487
Results of operations
  
 
1,322
 
   (2,326  1,261 
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Revenue
Sales to third parties (a)
6,4207,1545,081
Transfers (a) (b)
3,2204,1823,037
9,64011,3368,118
Production expenses5,0155,5214,728
Exploration expenses5532
Depreciation and depletion1,4751,4671,579
Income taxes7331,030457
Results of operations2,4123,3131,322
The amounts reported as costs incurred in property acquisitions, exploration and development activities include both capitalized costs and costs charged to expense during the year. Costs incurred also include new asset retirement obligations established in the current year, as well as increases or decreases to the asset retirement obligation resulting from changes in cost estimates or abandonment date.
Costs incurred in property acquisitions, exploration and development activities
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Property costs (c)
Proved — — 
Unproved — — 
Exploration costs5 32 
Development costs1,580 1,602 576 
Total costs incurred in property acquisitions, exploration and
development activities
1,585 1,607 608 
(a)Sales to third parties or transfers do not include the sale of natural gas and natural gas liquids purchased for resale, as well as royalty payments or diluent costs. These items are reported gross in note 2 in “Revenues”, “Intersegment sales” and in “Purchases of crude oil and products”.
(b)Sales of crude oil to consolidated affiliates are at market value, using posted field prices. Sales of natural gas liquids to consolidated affiliates are at prices estimated to be obtainable in a competitive, arm’s-length transaction.
(c)“Property costs” are payments for rights to explore for petroleum and natural gas and for purchased reserves (acquired tangible and intangible assets such as gas plants, production facilities and producing-well costs are included under “producing assets”). “Proved” represents areas where successful drilling has delineated a field capable of production. “Unproved” represents all other areas.




millions of Canadian dollars  
        2021
           2020           2019 
Property costs
(c)
      
Proved
  
 
-
 
   -    - 
Unproved
  
 
-
 
   -    2 
Exploration costs
  
 
32
 
   13    47 
Development costs
  
 
576
 
   816    1,176 
Total costs incurred in property acquisitions, exploration and development activities
  
 
608
 
   829    1,225 
(a)
Sales to customers or intersegment sales do not include the sale of natural gas and natural gas liquids purchased for resale, as well as royalty payments or diluent costs. These items are reported gross in note 2 in “Revenues”, “Intersegment sales” and in “Purchases of crude oil and products”.
(b)
Sales of crude oil to consolidated affiliates are at market value, using posted field prices. Sales of natural gas liquids to consolidated affiliates are at prices estimated to be obtainable in a competitive, arm’s-length transaction.
(c)
“Property costs” are payments for rights to explore for petroleum and natural gas and for purchased reserves (acquired tangible and intangible assets such as gas plants, production facilities and producing-well costs are included under “producing assets”). “Proved” represents areas where successful drilling has delineated a field capable of production. “Unproved” represents all other areas.
107
108

Table of Contents

Capitalized costs
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 
Property costs (a)
Proved1,840 1,840 
Unproved493 493 
Producing assets39,759 39,075 
Incomplete construction2,683 2,375 
Total capitalized cost44,775 43,783 
Accumulated depreciation and depletion(19,568)(18,512)
Net capitalized costs25,207 25,271 
(a)“Property costs” are payments for rights to explore for petroleum and natural gas and for purchased reserves (acquired tangible and intangible assets such as gas plants, production facilities and producing-well costs are included under “producing assets”). “Proved” represents areas where successful drilling has delineated a field capable of production. “Unproved” represents all other areas.
millions of Canadian dollars  
2021
  2020 
Property costs
(a)
   
Proved
  
 
2,045
 
  2,070 
Unproved
  
 
2,468
 
  2,462 
Producing assets
  
 
39,926
 
  39,785 
Incomplete construction
  
 
1,762
 
  1,518 
Total capitalized cost
  
 
46,201
 
  45,835 
Accumulated depreciation and depletion
  
 
(20,112
  (18,551
Net capitalized costs
  
 
26,089
 
  27,284 
(a)
“Property costs” are payments for rights to explore for petroleum and natural gas and for purchased reserves (acquired tangible and intangible assets such as gas plants, production facilities and producing-well costs are included under “producing assets”). “Proved” represents areas where successful drilling has delineated a field capable of production. “Unproved” represents all other areas.
Standardized measure of discounted future cash flows
As required by the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board, the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is computed by applying first-day-of-the-month average prices, year-end costs and legislated tax rates, and a discount factor of 10 percent to net proved reserves. The standardized measure includes costs for future dismantlement, abandonment and remediation obligations. The company believes the standardized measure does not provide a reliable estimate of the company’s expected future cash flows to be obtained from the development and production of its oil and gas properties or of the value of its proved oil and gas reserves. The standardized measure is prepared on the basis of certain prescribed assumptions, including first-day-of-the-month average prices, which represent discrete points in time and therefore may cause significant variability in cash flows from year to year as prices change.
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows related to proved oil and gas reserves
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Future cash flows158,347 198,923 161,577 
Future production costs(101,640)(104,765)(101,580)
Future development costs(24,074)(23,392)(21,903)
Future income taxes(7,016)(16,872)(8,192)
Future net cash flows25,617 53,894 29,902 
Annual discount of 10 percent for estimated timing of cash flows(11,615)(28,340)(15,732)
Discounted future cash flows14,002 25,554 14,170 
millions of Canadian dollars  
2021
  2020  2019 
Future cash flows
  
 
161,577
 
  23,911   166,801 
Future production costs
  
 
(101,580
  (18,787  (127,911
Future development costs
  
 
(21,903
  (6,096  (24,759
Future income taxes
  
 
(8,192
  (155  (3,960
Future net cash flows
  
 
29,902
 
  (1,127  10,171 
Annual discount of 10 percent for estimated timing of cash flows
  
 
(15,732
  1,065   (4,660
Discounted future cash flows
  
 
14,170
 
  (62  5,511 
Changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows related to proved oil and gas reserves
millions of Canadian dollars2023 2022 2021 
Balance at beginning of year25,554 14,170 (62)
Changes resulting from:
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs(4,918)(6,113)(3,841)
Net changes in prices, development costs and production costs (a)
(16,908)23,215 7,681 
Extensions, discoveries, additions and improved recovery,
     less related costs
58 664 52 
Development costs incurred during the year1,182 1,160 650 
Revisions of previous quantity estimates2,146 (4,431)13,482 
Accretion of discount2,535 1,439 24 
Net change in income taxes4,353 (4,550)(3,816)
Net change(11,552)11,384 14,232 
Balance at end of year14,002 25,554 14,170 
(a)SEC rules require the company’s reserves to be calculated on the basis of average first-day-of-the-month oil and natural gas prices during the reporting year. Future net cash flows are determined based on the net proved reserves as outlined in the “Net proved reserves table”.
millions of Canadian dollars  
2021
          2020        2019 
Balance at beginning of year
  
 
(62
  5,511   8,734 
Changes resulting from:
    
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs
  
 
(3,841
  (447  (2,441
Net changes in prices, development costs and production costs
(a)
  
 
7,681
 
  (8,661  (3,117
Extensions, discoveries, additions and improved recovery, less related costs
  
 
52
 
  114   169 
Development costs incurred during the year
  
 
650
 
  563   1,016 
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
  
 
13,482
 
  459   (168
Accretion of discount
  
 
24
 
  623   643 
Net change in income taxes
  
 
(3,816
  1,776   675 
Net change
  
 
14,232
 
  (5,573  (3,223
Balance at end of year
  
 
14,170
 
  (62  5,511 
(a)
SEC rules require the company’s reserves to be calculated on the basis of average first-day-of-the-month oil and natural gas prices during the reporting year. Future net cash flows are determined based on the net proved reserves as outlined in the “Net proved reserves table”.
108
109

Net proved reserves (a)
(a)
   Liquids 
(b)
  Natural gas  Synthetic oil  Bitumen  Total
oil-equivalent

basis
(c)
 
   millions of
barrels
  billions of
cubic feet
  millions of
barrels
  millions of
barrels
  millions of
barrels
 
Beginning of year 2019
   62   639   466   3,166   3,800 
Revisions
   (20  (33  (27  (134  (187
Improved recovery
   -   -   -   -   - 
(Sale) purchase of reserves in place
   -   (24  -   -   (4
Discoveries and extensions
   4   51   -   -   13 
Production
   (5  (52  (24  (93  (130
End of year 2019
   41   581   415   2,939   3,492 
Revisions
   (29  (348  (79  (2,757  (2,923
Improved recovery
   -   -   -   -   - 
(Sale) purchase of reserves in place
   -   (10  -   -   (2
Discoveries and extensions
   -   -   133   1   134 
Production
   (5  (55  (25  (102  (141
End of year 2020
   7   168   444   81   560 
Revisions
   13   165   17   2,239   2,297 
Improved recovery
   -   -   -   2   2 
(Sale) purchase of reserves in place
   -   (10  -   -   (2
Discoveries and extensions
   -   -   -   -   - 
Production
   (4  (42  (23  (106  (140
End of year 2021
  
 
16
 
 
 
281
 
 
 
438
 
 
 
2,216
 
 
 
2,717
 
Net proved developed reserves included above, as of
      
January 1, 2019
   24   273   466   2,861   3,396 
December 31, 2019
   22   291   415   2,609   3,095 
December 31, 2020
   7   167   311   76   422 
December 31, 2021
  
 
14
 
 
 
205
 
 
 
326
 
 
 
1,957
 
 
 
2,331
 
Net proved undeveloped reserves included above, as of
      
January 1, 2019
   38   366   -   305   404 
December 31, 2019
   19   290   -   330   397 
December 31, 2020
   -   1   133   5   138 
December 31, 2021
  
 
2
 
 
 
76
 
 
 
112
 
 
 
259
 
 
 
386
 
(a)
Net reserves are the company’s share of reserves after deducting the shares of mineral owners or governments or both. All reported reserves are located in Canada. Reserves of natural gas are calculated at a pressure of 14.73 pounds per square inch at 60°F.
(b)
Liquids include crude, condensate and natural gas liquids (NGLs). NGL proved reserves are not material and are therefore included under liquids.
(c)
Gas converted to oil-equivalent at six million cubic feet per one thousand barrels.
 
Liquids (b)
Natural gasSynthetic crude oilBitumen
Total
oil-equivalent
basis (c)
 
millions of
barrels
billions of
cubic feet
millions of
barrels
millions of
barrels
millions of
barrels
Beginning of year 2021168 444 81 560 
Revisions13 165 17 2,239 2,297 
Improved recovery— — — 
(Sale) purchase of reserves in place— (10)— — (2)
Discoveries and extensions— — — — — 
Production(4)(42)(23)(106)(140)
End of year 202116 281 438 2,216 2,717 
Revisions— (41)(62)(363)(432)
Improved recovery— — — — — 
(Sale) purchase of reserves in place(9)(141)— — (32)
Discoveries and extensions— — 67 67 
Production(3)(29)(23)(96)(127)
End of year 202272 353 1,824 2,193 
Revisions(2)26 90 114 
Improved recovery— — — — — 
(Sale) purchase of reserves in place— (1)— — — 
Discoveries and extensions— — — — — 
Production(2)(12)(25)(103)(132)
End of year 2023 61 354 1,811 2,175 
Net proved developed reserves included above, as of
January 1, 2021167 311 76 422 
December 31, 202114 205 326 1,957 2,331 
December 31, 202260 248 1,691 1,953 
December 31, 2023 53 242 1,706 1,957 
Net proved undeveloped reserves included above, as of
January 1, 2021— 133 138 
December 31, 202176 112 259 386 
December 31, 2022— 12 105 133 240 
December 31, 2023 8 112 105 218 
(a)Net reserves are the company’s share of reserves after deducting the shares of mineral owners or governments or both. All reported reserves are located in Canada. Reserves of natural gas are calculated at a pressure of 14.73 pounds per square inch at 60°F.
(b)Liquids include crude, condensate and natural gas liquids (NGLs). NGL proved reserves are not material and are therefore included under liquids.
(c)Gas converted to oil-equivalent at six million cubic feet per one thousand barrels.
The information above describes changes during the years and balances of proved oil and gas reserves at year-end 2019, 20202021, 2022 and 2021.2023. The definitions used are in accordance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’sSEC Rule 4-10 (a) of Regulation S-X.
Proved oil and natural gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible – from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations – prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire. In some cases, substantial new investments in additional wells and other facilities will be required to recover these proved reserves.
109

110

In accordance with SEC rules, the year-end reserves volumes, as well as the reserves change categories shown in the proved reserves tables are required to be calculated on the basis of average prices during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period. These reserves quantities were also used in calculating unit-of-production depreciation rates and in calculating the standardized measure of discounted net cash flow.
Revisions in previously estimated volumes of proved reserves for existing fields can occur due to the evaluation or re-evaluation of already available geologic, reservoir or production data; new geologic, reservoir or production data; or changes in the average of first-day-of-the-month oil and natural gas prices and / or costs that are used in the estimation of reserves. Revisions can also result from significant changes in either development strategy or production equipment /and facility capacity.

In 2019, downward revisions to proved bitumen reserves were driven by technical and development plan updates at Kearl, resulting in a decrease of 0.2 billion barrels, partially offset by an increase of 0.1 billion barrels at Cold Lake associated with an end of field life change driven by pricing. Downward revisions to proved synthetic oil reserves were a result of higher royalty obligations at Syncrude driven by pricing. Changes to liquids and natural gas proved reserves were the result of updated development plans at the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets and the divestment of conventional properties.
In 2020, downward revisions of proved bitumen reserves were a result of low prices. The 2.2 billion barrels of bitumen at Kearl and 0.6 billion barrels of bitumen at Cold Lake no longer qualified as proved reserves under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission definition of proved reserves. Downward revisions to proved synthetic oil reserves were a result of lower prices, offset by the addition of proved undeveloped reserves associated with future development at Syncrude. Changes to the liquids and natural gas proved reserves were the result of updated development plans at the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets and the divestment of conventional properties.
In 2021, upward revisions of proved bitumen reserves were a result of improved prices. The 1.7 billion barrels of bitumen at Kearl and 0.5 billion barrels of bitumen at Cold Lake qualified as proved reserves under the U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC definition of proved reserves. Upward revisions to proved synthetic crude oil reserves were a result of improved prices. Changes to the liquids and natural gas proved reserves were the result of updated development plans and divestments at the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets.
In 2022, downward revisions of proved bitumen reserves were driven by a decrease of 0.2 billion barrels at Kearl as a result of higher royalty obligations associated with pricing, and a decrease of 0.2 billion barrels at Cold Lake due to an updated development plan. An increase to the bitumen reserves of 0.1 billion barrels is associated with extensions at Cold Lake for the Grand Rapids Phase 1 SA-SAGD and Leming SAGD projects. Downward revisions to proved synthetic crude oil reserves were a result of mine development plan updates and higher royalty obligations at Syncrude associated with pricing. Changes to the liquids and natural gas proved reserves were primarily a result of the sale of the company’s interest in the Montney and Duvernay unconventional assets.
In 2023, upward revisions of proved bitumen of 0.1 billion barrels were driven by lower royalty obligations associated with lower pricing and minor technical revisions at Cold Lake and Kearl. A slight increase in proved reserves for synthetic crude oil is associated with lower royalty obligations associated with pricing. Conventional proved liquids reserves decreased to zero under existing pricing and operating conditions.
Under the terms of certain contractual arrangements or government royalty regimes, lower prices can also increase proved reserves attributable to Imperial.the company. The company’s operating decisions and its outlook for future production volumes are not impacted by proved reserves as disclosed under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)SEC definition.
Net proved reserves are determined by deducting the estimated future share of mineral owners or governments or both. For liquids and natural gas, net proved reserves are based on estimated future royalty rates as of the date the estimate is made incorporating the applicable governments’ oil and gas royalty regimes. For bitumen, net proved reserves are based on the company’s best estimate of average royalty rates over the remaining life of each of the Cold Lake and Kearl fields, and they incorporate the Alberta government’s oil sands royalty regime. For synthetic crude oil, net proved reserves are based on the company’s best estimate of average royalty rates over the remaining life of the project, and they incorporate the Alberta government’s oil sands royalty regime. In all cases, actual future royalty rates may vary with production, price and costs.
Net proved developed reserves are those volumes that are expected to be recovered through existing wells, and facilities, or mining activities with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well or facility. Net proved undeveloped reserves are those volumes that are expected to be recovered as a result of future investments to drill new wells, to recomplete existing wells and / or to install facilities to collect and deliver the production from existing and future wells, and facilities.facilities, or mining activities.


110
111

Proxy information section
Proxy information section
Table of contentsPage
Nominees for director
Page
Director nominee tables
112
112
116
117
117
118
118
119
120
121
122
122
2023123
124
nominees124
125
126
127
127
137
144
145
146
146
148
149
149
151
151
152
154
156
Executive summary157
design161
Determining compensation
Other compensation elements
Risk and governance
Executive compensation tables and narratives172
179
Appendix
Appendix A – Board of director and committee charters179

111
112

Nominees for director
The director nominee tables on the following pages provide information on the seven nominees proposed for election to the board of directors of the company. All of the nominees, with the exception of N.A. Hansen, are now directors and have been since the dates indicated. M.R. Crocker is a current director and has chosen not to stand for re-election. Mr. Hansen is not currently a director and is being nominated for election as a director for the first time.
Included in these tables is information relating to the director nominees’ biographies, independence status, expertise, standing committee memberships, attendance, public board memberships and shareholdings in the company. The information is as of February 15, 2022,2024, the effective date of this circular, unless otherwise indicated.
For more information on our director nominees, please see the Statement of corporate governance practice starting on page 118.
section.
Director nominee tables

David W. Cornhill
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Nonemployee director (independent)
Age:
68
Director since
: November 29, 2017
Skills and experience:
Leadership of large organizations, Operations/technical, Project management, Strategy development, Audit committee financial expert, Financial expertise, Executive compensation, Environment and sustainability, Risk management
Mr. Cornhill is a director of AltaGas Ltd., and is the chairman of the board of directors of TriSummit Utilities Inc. (formerly AltaGas Canada Inc.), a privately owned corporation. Mr. Cornhill is a founding shareholder of AltaGas (and its predecessors). He was chief executive officer of AltaGas from 1994 to 2016 and served as interim
co-chief
executive officer from July to December 2018. Prior to forming AltaGas, Mr. Cornhill served in various capacities with Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd, including
vice-president, finance and administration, treasurer and president and chief executive officer. Mr. Cornhill is an experienced leader in the business community and is a strong supporter of communities and community collaboration, investment and enhancement. He is a member of the Ivey Advisory Board at Western University. Mr. Cornhill holds a BSc (Hons.) degree and a MBA degree from Western University, and he was awarded an honorary Doctor of Laws degree by the University in 2015.
Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
DAVID W. CORNHILLDAVID W. CORNHILL
  
 
IMO Common
Shares
(% of class)
 
 
IMO Deferred      
Share Units      
(DSU)      
 
  
Total Vested      
Equity Holdings      
(Common + DSU)      
 
  
Restricted      
Stock Units      
(RSU)      
 
  
Total      
Holdings *      
(Common + DSU + RSU)      
 
Cornhill (cropped).jpg
Mr. Cornhill is a director of AltaGas Ltd., and is the chairman of the board of directors of TriSummit Utilities Inc. (formerly AltaGas Canada Inc.), a privately owned corporation. Mr. Cornhill is a founding shareholder of AltaGas (and its predecessors). He was chief executive officer of AltaGas from 1994 to 2016 and served as interim co-chief executive officer from July to December 2018. Prior to forming AltaGas, Mr. Cornhill served in various capacities with Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd, including vice-president, finance and administration, treasurer and president and chief operating officer. Mr. Cornhill is an experienced leader in the business community and is a strong supporter of communities and community collaboration, investment and enhancement. He is a member of the Ivey Advisory Board at Western University. Mr. Cornhill holds a BSc (Hons.) degree and a MBA degree from Western University, and he was awarded an honorary Doctor of Laws degree by the University in 2015.
Holdings as at February 15, 2022 (#)
  12,500
(<0.01%)
 10,953        
23,453      
  14,900        
38,353      
Total market value as at February 15, 2022 ($)
  697,500 611,177        
1,308,677    
  831,420        
2,140,097      
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Age: 70

Nonemployee director (independent)

Director since:
November 29, 2017

Skills and experience:
Leadership of large organizations,
Operations/technical,
Project management,
Strategy development,
Environment and sustainability,
Audit committee financial expert,
Financial expertise,
Executive compensation,
Risk management

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Age: 70

Nonemployee director (independent)

Director since:
November 29, 2017

Skills and experience:
Leadership of large organizations,
Operations/technical,
Project management,
Strategy development,
Environment and sustainability,
Audit committee financial expert,
Financial expertise,
Executive compensation,
Risk management

Board and Standing Committee MembershipAttendance in 2023Voting Results of Last Annual Meeting
Audit5 of 5 (100%)Votes For:477,220,521 (90.28%)
Executive resources8 of 8 (100%)Votes against:51,359,878 (9.72%)
Safety and sustainability5 of 5 (100%)Total Votes:528,580,399
Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
IMO Common Shares
(% of class)
IMO Deferred Share Units
(DSU)
Total Vested Equity Holdings
(Common + DSU)
Restricted Stock Units
(RSU)
Total Holdings*
(Common + DSU + RSU)
Holdings as at February 15, 2024 (#)12,50015,21727,71718,70046,417
(<0.01%)(<0.01%)15,217
Total market value as at February 15, 2024 ($)Total market value as at February 15, 2024 ($)1,016,2502,253,3921,520,3103,773,702
Year over year change (#)
  0 2,769        
2,769      
  3,300        
6,069      
Year over year change (#)01,9091,9091,8003,709
*Meets the necessary share ownership requirements*Meets the necessary share ownership requirements
Public Company Directorships in the Past Five Years*Public Company Directorships in the Past Five Years*
Other Positions in the Past Five Years
(position, date office held and status of employer)
AltaGas Ltd. (2010 - present)
AltaGas Canada Inc. (2018 - 2020)
*no public board interlocks
AltaGas Ltd. (2010 - present)
AltaGas Canada Inc. (2018 - 2020)
*no public board interlocks
AltaGas Ltd., Chairman of the board (1994 - 2019)
*Meets the necessary share ownership requirements113
  Board and Standing Committee Membership
Meeting
Attendance 2021
Public Company Directorships in the Past Five
Years*
Imperial Oil Limited board
Audit committee
Executive resources committee
Public policy and corporate responsibility committee
Nominations and corporate governance committee
(Chair)
Community collaboration and engagement committee
10 of 10 
(100%)

5 of 5 
(100%)
6 of 6 
(100%)
3 of 3 
(100%)
7 of 7 
(100%)
1 of 1 
(100%)
- AltaGas Ltd. (2010 – present)
- AltaGas Canada Inc. (2018 – 2020)
- Alterra Power Corp. (2008 – 2018)
- Painted Pony Energy Ltd. (2015 – 2017)
*no public board interlocks

BRADLEY W. CORSON
Corson (cropped).jpg
Mr. Corson was appointed as president and a director of Imperial Oil Limited on September 17, 2019, and assumed the additional roles of chairman and chief executive officer on January 1, 2020. Mr. Corson has worked for Exxon Mobil Corporation and its predecessor companies since 1983 in various upstream and downstream assignments, with responsibilities in the United States, Hong Kong and London. In his previous position, Mr. Corson was vice-president of Exxon Mobil Corporation and president of ExxonMobil Upstream Ventures, a division of Exxon Mobil Corporation.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Age: 62

Non-independent director

Director since:
September 17, 2019

Skills and experience:
Leadership of large organizations,
Operations/technical,
Project management,
Global experience, Strategy development,
Environment and sustainability,
Financial expertise,
Government relations, Executive compensation,
Risk management

Board and Standing Committee MembershipAttendance in 2023Voting Results of Last Annual Meeting
Board (Chair)
8 of 8 (100%)Votes For:522,575,825 (98.86%)
Votes Against:6,004,574 (1.14%)
Total Votes:528,580,399
Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
IMO Common Shares
(% of class)
IMO Deferred Share Units
(DSU)
Total Vested Equity Holdings
(Common + DSU)
Restricted Stock Units
(RSU)
Total Holdings*
(Common + DSU + RSU)
Holdings as at February 15, 2024 (#)000410,400410,400
Total market value as at February 15, 2024 ($)00033,365,52033,365,520
Year over year change (#)00086,80086,800
*Meets the necessary share ownership requirements
Public Company Directorships in the Past Five Years*
Other Positions in the Past Five Years
(position, date office held and status of employer)
None
 *no public board interlocks
President, Imperial Oil Limited (2019 – present)
President, ExxonMobil Upstream Ventures
(2015 – 2019) (Affiliate)
SHARON R. DRISCOLL
Driscoll (cropped).jpg
Ms. Driscoll is currently an independent director of Empire Company Limited and also serves as a director of Gildan Activewear Inc. Prior to her retirement in 2023, Ms. Driscoll held executive positions at RB Global Incorporated, including chief financial officer, co-chief executive officer and executive vice-president and advisor to the chief executive officer. Prior to joining RB Global, Ms. Driscoll served as the executive vice-president and chief financial officer for Katz Group Canada Ltd. from 2013 to 2015 and was the senior vice-president and chief financial officer at Sears Canada Inc. from 2008 to 2013. Ms. Driscoll is a Chartered Professional Accountant and has a Bachelor of Commerce (Honours) degree from Queen’s University.
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Age: 62

Nonemployee director (independent)

Director since:
May 2, 2023

Skills and experience:
Leadership of large organizations,
Project management,
Global experience, Strategy development,
Environment and sustainability,
Audit committee financial expert,
Financial expertise,
Executive compensation,
Risk management

Board and Standing Committee MembershipAttendance in 2023Voting Results of Last Annual Meeting
Board4 of 4 (100%)
Audit (Chair)
2 of 2 (100%)Votes For:526,032,840 (99.52%)
Executive resources5 of 5 (100%)Votes against:2,547,559 (0.48%)
Safety and sustainability4 of 4 (100%)Total Votes:528,580,399
Nominations and corporate governance3 of 3 (100%)
Finance5 of 5 (100%)
Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
IMO Common Shares
(% of class)
IMO Deferred Share Units
(DSU)
Total Vested Equity Holdings
(Common + DSU)
Restricted Stock Units
(RSU)
Total Holdings*
(Common + DSU + RSU)
Holdings as at February 15, 2024 (#)01,1221,1223,3004,422
Total market value as at February 15, 2024 ($)091,21991,219268,290359,509
Year over year change (#)01,1221,1223,3004,422
*Has 5 years from date of appointment to meet the necessary share ownership requirements
Public Company Directorships in the Past Five Years*
Other Positions in the Past Five Years
(position, date office held and status of employer)
Gildan Activewear Ltd. (2023 - Present)
Empire Company Limited (2018 – Present)
 *no public board interlocks
RB Global (formerly Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated) Executive vice-president and advisor to CEO (2022 – 2023)
RB Global (formerly Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated), Chief financial officer (2015 - 2022)
RB Global (formerly Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated), Chief financial officer and Co-chief executive officer (2019)
114
  Voting Results of 2021 Annual General Meeting:
Other Positions in the Past Five Years:
(position, date office held, and status of employer)
Votes in Favour:
649,845,433 (96.37%)
Votes Withheld:
24,498,796 (3.63%)
- AltaGas Ltd., Chairman of the board (1994 – 2019)
- AltaGas Ltd., Interim
co-CEO
(July to December 2018)

JOHN N. FLOREN
Floren (cropped).jpg
Mr. Floren is the former president and chief executive officer of Methanex Corporation, and prior to that appointment held the positions of senior vice-president, global marketing and logistics and regional director, marketing and logistics, North America. Mr. Floren was an employee of Methanex for approximately 22 years and has worked in the chemical industry for over 37 years. He currently serves as a director of West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. Mr. Floren holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from the University of Manitoba and attended the Harvard Business School’s Program for Management Development, the International Executive Program at INSEAD and completed the Directors Education Program at the Institute of Corporate Directors.
Oakville, Ontario, Canada

Age: 65

Nonemployee director (independent)

Director since:
May 2, 2023

Skills and experience:
Leadership of large organizations,
Operations/technical
Project management,
Global experience, Strategy development,
Environment and sustainability,
Financial expertise,
Government relations
Information technology/Cybersecurity oversight
Executive compensation,
Risk management

Board and Standing Committee MembershipAttendance in 2023Voting Results of Last Annual Meeting
Board4 of 4 (100%)
Audit2 of 2 (100%)Votes For:528,279,988 (99.94%)
Executive resources5 of 5 (100%)Votes against:300,411 (0.06%)
Safety and sustainability (Chair)
4 of 4 (100%)Total Votes:528,580,399
Nominations and corporate governance3 of 3 (100%)
Finance5 of 5 (100%)
Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
IMO Common Shares
(% of class)
IMO Deferred Share Units
(DSU)
Total Vested Equity Holdings
(Common + DSU)
Restricted Stock Units
(RSU)
Total Holdings*
(Common + DSU + RSU)
Holdings as at February 15, 2024 (#)01,1221,1223,3004,422
Total market value as at February 15, 2024 ($)091,21991,219268,290359,509
Year over year change (#)01,1221,1223,3004,422
*Has 5 years from date of appointment to meet the necessary share ownership requirements
Public Company Directorships in the Past Five Years*
Other Positions in the Past Five Years
(position, date office held and status of employer)
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (2016 – present)
Methanex Corporation (2013 – 2022)
 *no public board interlocks
Methanex Corporation, President and chief executive officer (2013 – 2022)
GARY J. GOLDBERG
Goldberg (cropped).jpg
Mr. Goldberg has more than 40 years of global experience in the mining industry, including in executive, operational and strategic roles, and currently serves as a non-executive director of BHP Group Limited. Mr. Goldberg served as the chief executive officer of Newmont Corporation from 2013 to 2019, and prior to that, was president and chief executive officer of Rio Tinto Minerals. Mr. Goldberg was also a non-executive director of Port Waratah Coal Services Limited and Rio Tinto Zimbabwe, and served as vice-chair of the World Gold Council, treasurer of the International Council on Mining and Metals, and chair of the National Mining Association in the United States.
Breckenridge, Colorado, United States of America

Age: 65

Nonemployee director (independent)

Director since:
May 2, 2023

Skills and experience:
Leadership of large organizations,
Operations/technical,
Project management,
Global experience, Strategy development,
Environment and sustainability,
Financial expertise,
Government relations, Executive compensation,
Risk management

Board and Standing Committee MembershipAttendance in 2023Voting Results of Last Annual Meeting
Board4 of 4 (100%)
Audit2 of 2 (100%)Votes For:528,282,636 (99.94%)
Executive resources (Chair)
5 of 5 (100%)Votes against:297,763 (0.06%)
Safety and sustainability4 of 4 (100%)Total Votes:528,580,399
Nominations and corporate governance3 of 3 (100%)
Finance5 of 5 (100%)
Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
IMO Common Shares
(% of class)
IMO Deferred Share Units
(DSU)
Total Vested Equity Holdings
(Common + DSU)
Restricted Stock Units
(RSU)
Total Holdings*
(Common + DSU + RSU)
Holdings as at February 15, 2024 (#)01,1221,1223,3004,422
Total market value as at February 15, 2024 ($)091,21991,219268,290359,509
Year over year change (#)01,1221,1223,3004,422
*Has 5 years from date of appointment to meet the necessary share ownership requirements
Public Company Directorships in the Past Five Years*
Other Positions in the Past Five Years
(position, date office held and status of employer)
BHP Group Limited (2020 – present)
Newmont Corporation (previously Newmont Mining Corporation) (2013 – 2019)
*no public board interlocks
Newmont Corporation, Executive advisor (2019 – 2020)
Newmont Corporation, Chief executive officer (2013 – 2019)
115

 NEIL A. HANSEN
Hansen (background)2 cropped.jpg
Mr. Hansen is currently senior vice-president, energy products, for ExxonMobil Product Solutions Company and has held that position since April, 2022. He is responsible for the global fuels and aromatics value chains. Mr. Hansen has 24 years of financial and commercial experience across ExxonMobil's Upstream and Downstream businesses in the Americas, Europe, and Asia Pacific regions. Prior to his current position, Mr. Hansen was vice-president, fuels for Europe, Africa and Middle East based in Belgium and prior to that was vice-president investor relations and corporate secretary at ExxonMobil.
The Woodlands, Texas, United States of America

Age: 49

Non-independent director

Director since:
Not currently a member of the board; first nomination for election as director

Skills and experience:
Leadership of large organizations,
Project management,
Global experience, Strategy development,
Environment and sustainability,
Financial expertise,
Government relations, Executive compensation,
Risk management

Board and Standing Committee MembershipAttendance in 2023Voting Results of Last Annual Meeting
Not currently a member of the board or any of its committeesNoneVotes For:n/a
Votes against:n/a
Total Votes:n/a
Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
IMO Common Shares
(% of class)
IMO Deferred Share Units
(DSU)
Total Vested Equity Holdings
(Common + DSU)
Restricted Stock Units
(RSU)
Total Holdings*
(Common + DSU + RSU)
Holdings as at February 15, 2024 (#)00000
Total market value as at February 15, 2024 ($)00000
Year over year change (#)00000
* No share ownership guidelines apply
Public Company Directorships in the Past Five Years*
Other Positions in the Past Five Years
(position, date office held and status of employer)
None
 *no public board interlocks
Senior vice-president, energy products, Exxon Mobil Product Solutions Company, (2022 – present) (Affiliate)
Vice-president, fuels, ExxonMobil Fuels & Lubricants Company, (2020 – 2022) (Affiliate)
Vice-president, investor relations and corporate secretary, Exxon Mobil Corporation (2018 – 2020) (Affiliate)
112
MIRANDA C. HUBBS
Hubbs (cropped).jpg
Ms. Hubbs is currently an independent director of Nutrien Ltd. and also serves as a director of PSP Investments (Public Sector Pension Investment Board), Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) and serves as Chair of the board of the Canadian Red Cross. Prior to retirement in 2011, Ms. Hubbs was executive vice- president and managing director of McLean Budden, one of Canada’s leading investment managers. Ms. Hubbs holds a BSc from Western University and an MBA from Schulich School of Business at York University and is a CFA charterholder. Ms. Hubbs serves on the ICD Climate Strategy Advisory Board and the Global Risk Institute Sustainable Finance Advisory Committee, holds the Fundamentals of Sustainability Accounting credential from the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, and has received her CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight issued by the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University.
Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Age: 57

Nonemployee director (independent)

Director since:
July 26, 2018

Skills and experience:
Global experience, Strategy development,
Environment and sustainability,
Audit committee financial expert,
Financial expertise,
Information technology/Cybersecurity oversight
Executive compensation,
Risk management

Board and Standing Committee MembershipAttendance in 2023Voting Results of Last Annual Meeting
Board8 of 8 (100%)
Audit5 of 5 (100%)Votes For:515,973,536 (97.62%)
Executive resources7 of 8 (88%)Votes against:12,601,009 (2.38%)
Safety and sustainability5 of 5 (100%)Total Votes:528,574,545
Nominations and corporate governance (Chair)
5 of 6 (83%)
Finance5 of 5 (100%)
Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
IMO Common Shares
(% of class)
IMO Deferred Share Units
(DSU)
Total Vested Equity Holdings
(Common + DSU)
Restricted Stock Units
(RSU)
Total Holdings*
(Common + DSU + RSU)
Holdings as at February 15, 2024 (#)018,73618,73617,40036,136
Total market value as at February 15, 2024 ($)01,523,2371,523,2371,414,6202,937,857
Year over year change (#)02,0012,0011,8003,801
*Meets the necessary share ownership requirements
Public Company Directorships in the Past Five Years*
Other Positions in the Past Five Years
(position, date office held and status of employer)
Nutrien Ltd. (2018 – present)
 *no public board interlocks
None
116

Bradley W. Corson
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Non-independent
director
Age:
60
Director since
: September 17, 2019
Skills
and experience:
Leadership of large organizations, Operations/technical, Project management, Global experience, Strategy development, Financial expertise, Government relations, Executive compensation, Environment and sustainability, Risk management
Mr. Corson was appointed as president and a director of Imperial Oil Limited on September 17, 2019, and assumed the additional roles of chairman and chief executive officer on January 1, 2020. Mr. Corson has worked for Exxon Mobil Corporation and its predecessor companies since 1983 in various upstream and downstream
assignments, with responsibilities in the United States, Hong Kong and London. In his previous position, Mr. Corson was vice-president of Exxon Mobil Corporation and president of ExxonMobil Upstream Ventures, a division of Exxon Mobil Corporation.
  Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
   
IMO Common
Shares
(% of class)
 
IMO Deferred      
Share Units      
(DSU)      
 
Total Vested      
Equity Holdings      
(Common + DSU)      
 
Restricted      
Stock Units      
(RSU)      
 
Total      
Holdings *      
(Common + DSU +  RSU)      
Holdings as at February 15, 2022 (#)
 0 0   
0  
 234,600       
234,600  
Total market value as at February 15, 2022 ($)
 0 0   
0  
 13,090,680       
13,090,680  
Year over year change (#)
 0 0   
0  
 78,200       
78,200  

*Meets the necessary share ownership requirements
  Board and Standing Committee Membership
Meeting Attendance
2021
Public Company Directorships in the Past Five
Years*
Imperial Oil Limited board
(Chair)
Community collaboration and engagement committee
10 of 10 
(100%)

1 of 1 
(100%)
None
*no public board interlocks

  Voting Results of 2021 Annual General Meeting:
Other Positions in the Past Five Years:
(position, date office held, and status of employer)
Votes in Favour:
656,343,284 (97.33%)
Votes Withheld:
18,000,945 (2.67%)
- President, Imperial Oil Limited (2019 – present)
- President, ExxonMobil Upstream Ventures
  (2015 – 2019) (Affiliate)

Matthew R. Crocker
Spring, Texas, United States of America
Non-independent director
Age:
48
Director since
:
May 4, 2021
Skills and experience:
Leadership of large organizations, Operations/technical, Project management, Global experience, Strategy development, Financial expertise, Government relations, Executive compensation, Environment and sustainability, Risk management
Mr. Crocker is senior vice-president, fuels at ExxonMobil Fuels & Lubricants Company since September, 2020. He is responsible for the downstream global fuels value chain, from crude to customer. Mr. Crocker has also held leadership positions within refining, upstream business development, chemicals and controllers. Prior

to his current position, Mr. Crocker was vice-president, strategy and portfolio management, covering the full scope of ExxonMobil’s upstream business.
 
  Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
 
   
IMO Common
Shares
(% of class)
 
IMO Deferred      
Share Units      
(DSU)      
 
Total Vested      
Equity Holdings      
(Common + DSU)      
 
Restricted      
Stock Units      
(RSU)      
 
Total      
Holdings *      
(Common + DSU + RSU)      
Holdings as at February 15, 2022 (#)
 0 0     
0      
 0       
0  
Total market value as at February 15, 2022 ($)
 0 0     
0      
 0       
0  
Year over year change (#)
 0 0     
0      
 0       
0  
*No share ownership guidelines apply
  Board and Standing Committee Membership
Meeting Attendance
2021
Public Company Directorships in the Past
Five Years*
Imperial Oil Limited board
Executive resources committee
Public policy and corporate responsibility committee
Nominations and corporate governance committee
Community collaboration and engagement committee
6 of 6 
(100%)

3 of 3 
(100%)
2 of 2 
(100%)
5 of 5 
(100%)
1 of 1 
(100%)
None
*no public board interlocks
  Voting Results of 2021 Annual General Meeting:
Other Positions in the Past Five Years:
(position, date office held, and status of employer)
Votes in Favour:
671,381,457  (99.56%)
Votes Withheld:
2,962,822  (0.44%)
- Senior vice president, fuels, ExxonMobil Fuels & Lubricants Company
  (2020 – Present) (Affiliate)
- Vice-president, strategy and portfolio management, ExxonMobil Upstream Business Development Company (2019 – 2020) (Affiliate)
- Special assignment, strategy and portfolio management, ExxonMobil Upstream Business Development Company (2019) (Affiliate)
- Vice-president, intermediates, performance derivatives, ExxonMobil Chemical Company (2017 – 2019) (Affiliate)
- Project executive, ExxonMobil Refining & Supply (2016 – 2017) (Affiliate)
113

Krystyna T. Hoeg
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Nonemployee director (independent)
Age
:
72
Director since
: May 1, 2008
Skills and experience:
Leadership of large organizations, Project management, Global experience, Strategy development, Audit committee financial expert, Financial expertise, Executive compensation, Environment and sustainability, Risk management
Ms. Hoeg was the president and chief executive officer of Corby Distilleries Limited from 1996 until her retirement in February 2007. She previously held several positions in the finance and controllers functions of Allied Domecq PLC and Hiram Walker & Sons Limited. Prior to that, she spent five years in public practice as a
chartered accountant with the accounting firm Touche Ross. She is currently a director of New Flyer Industries Inc. and is also a director of Revera Inc., Arterra Wines Canada Inc., and Duo Bank of Canada and Duo Financial Corporation, privately owned corporations. Ms. Hoeg is a past chair of the board of the Michael Garron Hospital.
  Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
    
IMO Common
Shares
(% of class)
  
IMO Deferred      
Share Units      
(DSU)
      
 
Total Vested      
Equity Holdings        
(Common + DSU)
        
  
Restricted      
Stock Units      
(RSU)
      
 
Total      
Holdings *      
(Common + DSU + RSU)
      
Holdings as at February 15, 2022 (#)
  0  51,161       
51,161      
  17,200       
68,361  
Total market value as at February 15, 2022 ($)
  0  2,854,784       
2,854,784      
  959,760       
3,814,544  
Year over year change (#)
  0  4,448       
4,448      
  1,000       
5,448   
*Meets the necessary share ownership requirements
  Board and Standing Committee Membership
Meeting
Attendance 2021
Public Company Directorships in the Past Five
Years*
Imperial Oil Limited board
Audit committee
(Chair)
Executive resources committee
Public policy and corporate responsibility committee
Nominations and corporate governance committee
Community collaboration and engagement committee
10 of 10 
(100%)

5 of 5 
(100%)
6 of 6 
(100%)
3 of 3 
(100%)
7 of 7 
(100%)
1 of 1 
(100%)
- New Flyer Industries Inc. (2015 – Present)
*no public board interlocks
  Voting Results of 2021 Annual General Meeting:
Other Positions in the Past Five Years:
(position, date office held, and status of employer)
Votes in Favour:
664,148,118 (98.49%)
Votes Withheld:
10,196,111 (1.51%)
None
Miranda C. Hubbs
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Nonemployee director (independent)
Age:
55
Director since
: July 26, 2018
Skills and
experience:
Global experience, Strategy development, Audit committee financial expert, Financial expertise, Information technology/cybersecurity oversight, Executive compensation, Environment and sustainability, Risk management
Ms. Hubbs is currently an independent director of Nutrien Ltd. and PSP Investments (Public Sector Pension Investment Board). Ms. Hubbs serves as vice-chair of the board of the Canadian Red Cross. Prior to retirement in 2011, Ms. Hubbs was executive vice president and managing director of McLean Budden, one of Canada’s
leading investment managers. Ms. Hubbs holds a BSc from Western University and an MBA from Schulich School of Business at York University and is a CFA charterholder. Ms. Hubbs serves on the ICD Climate Strategy Advisory Board and the Global Risk Institute Sustainable Finance Advisory Committee, holds the Fundamentals of Sustainability Accounting credential from the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, and has received her CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight issued by the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University.
  Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
    
IMO Common
Shares
(% of class)
  
IMO Deferred      
Share Units      
(DSU)
      
 
Total Vested        
Equity Holdings        
(Common + DSU)
        
  
Restricted      
Stock Units      
(RSU)
      
 
Total      
Holdings *      
(Common + DSU + RSU)
      
Holdings as at February 15, 2022 (#)
  0  14,383       
14,383      
  12,300       
26,683  
Total market value as at February 15, 2022 ($)
  0  802,571       
802,571      
  686,340       
1,488,911  
Year over year change (#)
  0  3,470        
3,470      
  3,300       
6,770  
*Meets the necessary share ownership requirements
  Board and Standing Committee Membership
Meeting
Attendance 2021
Public Company Directorships in the Past Five
Years*
Imperial Oil Limited board
Audit committee
Executive resources committee
Public policy and corporate responsibility committee
Nominations and corporate governance committee
Community collaboration and engagement committee
(Chair)
10 of 10 
(100%)

5 of 5
(100%)
6 of 6
(100%)
3 of 3
(100%)
7 of 7
(100%)
1 of 1
(100%)
- Nutrien Ltd. (2018 – present)
- Agrium Inc. (2016 – 2018)
- Spectra Energy Corporation (2015 – 2017)
*no public board interlocks
  Voting Results of 2021 Annual General Meeting:
Other Positions in the Past Five Years:
(position, date office held, and status of employer)
Votes in Favour:
669,057,757 (99.22%)
Votes Withheld:
5,286,472 (0.78%)
None
114

Jack M. Mintz
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Nonemployee director (independent)
Age
:
70
Director since
: April 21, 2005
Skills and experience:
Global experience
, Strategy development, Financial expertise, Government relations, Academic/research, Executive compensation, Environment and sustainability, Risk management
Dr. Mintz is currently the President’s Fellow at the University of Calgary’s School of Public Policy, a position he has held since July 2015. Dr. Mintz also serves on the board of Alberta Health Services and is the Senior Fellow at the C.D. Howe Institute, Distinguished Fellow at the MacDonald-Laurier Distinguished Fellow at the
MacDonald-Laurier Institute and Research Fellow at the International Tax and Investment Center (Washington D.C.). From 2006 to 2015, Dr. Mintz was the founding Director and Palmer Chair in Public Policy for the University of Calgary, and from 1999 to 2006, he was the president and chief executive officer of the C.D. Howe Institute. Prior to 2007, he also held professor positions at Queen’s University and the Joseph L. Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. Dr. Mintz also has published widely in the fields of public economics and fiscal federalism, has been an advisor to governments on fiscal matters, and has frequently published articles in national newspapers and magazines. Dr. Mintz received the Order of Canada in 2015.
  Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
   
IMO Common
Shares
(% of class)
 
IMO Deferred      
Share Units      
(DSU)
      
 
Total Vested      
Equity Holdings      
(Common + DSU)
      
 
Restricted      
Stock Units      
(RSU)
      
 
Total      
Holdings *      
(Common + DSU + RSU)
      
Holdings as at February 15, 2022 (#)
 1,000
(<0.01%)
 46,530       
47,530      
 17,200       
64,730  
Total market value as at February 15, 2022 ($)
 55,800 2,596,374       
2,652,174      
 959,760       
3,611,934  
Year over year change (#)
 0 4,325       
4,325      
 1,000       
5,325  
*Meets the necessary share ownership requirements
  Board and Standing Committee Membership
Meeting
Attendance 2021
Public Company Directorships in the Past Five
Years*
Imperial Oil Limited board
Audit committee
Executive resources committee
Public policy and corporate responsibility committee
(Chair)
Nominations and corporate governance committee
Community collaboration and engagement committee
10 of 10 
(100%)

5 of 5
(100%)
6 of 6
(100%)
3 of 3
(100%)
7 of 7
(100%)
1 of 1
(100%)
- Morneau Shepell Inc. (2010 – 2020)
*no public board interlocks
  Voting Results of 2021 Annual General Meeting:
Other Positions in the Past Five Years:
(position, date office held, and status of employer)
Votes in Favour:
643,739,018 (95.46%)
Votes Withheld:
30,605,211 (4.54%)
None
David S. Sutherland
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
Nonemployee director (independent)
Age
:
72
Director
since
: April 29, 2010
Skills and experience:
Leadership of large organizations, Operations/technical, Global experience, Strategy development, Audit committee financial expert, Financial expertise, Government relations, Executive compensation, Environment and sustainability, Risk management
In July 2007, Mr. Sutherland retired as president and chief executive officer of the former IPSCO, Inc. after spending 30 years with the company and more than five years as president and chief executive officer. Mr. Sutherland is the chairman of the board of United States Steel Corporation and director of GATX Corporation.
Mr. Sutherland is also chairman of Graham Group Ltd., an employee owned corporation. Mr. Sutherland is a former chairman of the American Iron and Steel Institute and served as a member of the board of directors of the Steel Manufacturers Association, the International Iron and Steel Institute, the Canadian Steel Producers Association and the National Association of Manufacturers.
  Imperial Oil Limited Ownership and Value of Equity (a) (b) (c) (d)
   
IMO Common
Shares
(% of class)
 
IMO Deferred      
Share Units      
(DSU)
      
 
Total Vested      
Equity Holdings      
(Common + DSU)
      
 
Restricted      
Stock Units      
(RSU)
      
 
Total      
Holdings *      
(Common + DSU + RSU)
      
Holdings as at February 15, 2022 (#)
 55,000
(<0.01%)
 43,636       
98,636      
 17,200       
115,836  
Total market value as at February 15, 2022 ($)
 3,069,000 2,434,889       
5,503,889      
 959,760  ��    
6,463,649  
Year over year change (#)
 0 4,248       
4,248      
 1,000       
5,248  
*Meets the necessary share ownership requirements
  Board and Standing Committee Membership
Meeting
Attendance 2021
Public Company Directorships in the Past Five
Years*
Imperial Oil Limited board
Audit committee
Executive resources committee
(Chair)
Public policy and corporate responsibility committee
Nominations and corporate governance committee
Community collaboration and engagement committee
10 of 10 
(100%)

5 of 5
(100%)
6 of 6
(100%)
3 of 3
(100%)
7 of 7
(100%)
1 of 1
(100%)
- GATX Corporation (2007 – Present)
- United States Steel Corporation (2008 – Present)
*no public board interlocks
  Voting Results of 2021 Annual General Meeting:
Other Positions in the Past Five Years:
(position, date office held, and status of employer)
Votes in Favour:
658,802,073 (97.70%)
Votes Withheld:
15,542,156 (2.30%)
None
115

Footnotes to director nominee tables on pages 112113 through 115:
116:
(a)
The information includes the beneficial ownership of common shares of Imperial Oil Limited, which information not being within the knowledge of the company has been provided by the nominees individually.
(b)
The company’s plan for restricted stock units for nonemployee directors is described on page 140. The company’s plan for deferred share units for nonemployee directors is described on page 139. The company’s plan for restricted stock units for selected employees is described on page 163.
(c)
The numbers for the company’s restricted stock units represent the total of the outstanding restricted stock units received in 2015 through 2021 and deferred share units received since directors’ appointment.
(d)
The value for Imperial Oil Limited common shares, deferred share units and restricted stock units is based on the closing price for Imperial Oil Limited common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange of $55.80 on February 15, 2022.

(a)The information includes the beneficial ownership of common shares of Imperial Oil Limited, which information not being within the knowledge of the company has been provided by the nominees individually.
(b)The company’s plan for restricted stock units for nonemployee directors is described on page 144. The company’s plan for deferred share units for nonemployee directors is described on page 143. The company’s plan for restricted stock units for selected employees is described on page 164.
(c)The numbers for the company’s restricted stock units represent the total of the outstanding restricted stock units received in 2017 through 2023 and deferred share units received since directors’ appointment.
(d)The value for Imperial Oil Limited common shares, deferred share units and restricted stock units is based on the closing price for Imperial Oil Limited common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange of $81.30 on February 15, 2024.

Director and nominee holdings in Exxon Mobil Corporation (a)
  Director
  
XOM Common
Shares
(#)
  
XOM Restricted
Stock
(#)
(b)
  
Total Common
Shares and
Restricted Stock
(#)
  
Total Market Value of  
Common Shares and  
Restricted Stock  
($)  
(c)  
B.W. Corson
  114,686  88,000  202,686  
20,140,312  
M.R. Crocker
  15,938  102,250  118,188  
11,743,994  
D.S. Sutherland
  5,730  -  5,730  
569,373  
 DirectorXOM Common
Shares
(#)
XOM Restricted
Stock
(#)
(b)
Total Common
Shares and
Restricted Stock
(#)
Total Market Value of
Common Shares and
Restricted Stock
($)
(c)
B.W. Corson129,04459,700188,74426,417,156
M.R. Crocker (d)
22,433149,000171,43323,994,258
N.A. Hansen155,800155,80021,806,218
(a)Holdings as at February 15, 2024. The information includes the beneficial ownership of common shares of Exxon Mobil Corporation, which information not being within the knowledge of the company has been provided by the nominees and directors individually. None of these individuals own more than 0.01 percent of the outstanding shares of Exxon Mobil Corporation. D.W. Cornhill, S.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren, G.J. Goldberg and M.C. Hubbs do not own common shares or hold restricted stock of Exxon Mobil Corporation.
(b)The numbers for Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock include outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units granted under its restricted stock plan which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan.
(a)
(c)The value for Exxon Mobil Corporation common shares and restricted stock is based on the closing price for Exxon Mobil Corporation common shares on the New York Stock Exchange of $103.73 U.S., which is converted to Canadian dollars at the daily rate of exchange of $1.3493 provided by the Bank of Canada for February 15, 2024.
(d)M.R. Crocker is a current director and has chosen not to stand for re-election. Mr. Crocker does not hold any Imperial Oil Limited common shares, restricted stock units or deferred share units.
Holdings as at February 15, 2022. The information includes the beneficial ownership of common shares of Exxon Mobil Corporation, which information not being within the knowledge of the company has been provided by the nominees and directors individually. None of these individuals own more than 0.01 percent of the outstanding shares of Exxon Mobil Corporation. D.W. Cornhill, K.T. Hoeg, M.C. Hubbs and J.M. Mintz do not own common shares or hold restricted stock of Exxon Mobil Corporation.
(b)
The numbers for Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock include outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units granted under its restricted stock plan which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan.
(c)
The value for Exxon Mobil Corporation common shares and restricted stock is based on the closing price for Exxon Mobil Corporation common shares on the New York Stock Exchange of $77.99 U.S., which is converted to Canadian dollars at the daily rate of exchange of $1.2741 provided by the Bank of Canada for February 15, 2022.
Majority voting policy
In 2022, amendments to the Canada Business Corporations Act came into force implementing majority voting requirements for uncontested director elections. These amendments provide for the election of a director only if the number of “for” votes represents a majority of the votes cast both “for” and “against” the director. Following the implementation of these amendments, the company’s existing majority voting policy was rendered redundant and was revoked by the board.


117
In order

Corporate governance disclosure

Table of contents
Corporate governance disclosure
2023 Corporate governance highlights
Corporate governance at a glance
Statement of corporate governance practice
Composition of our board nominees
Tenure of our board nominees
Skills and experience of our board members and nominees
Independence of our board members and nominees
Committee membership of our board
Number of meetings
Attendance of our board members in 2023
Other public company directorships of our board members and nominees
Interlocking directorships of our board nominees
Director qualification and selection process
Director orientation, education and development
Board performance assessment
Board and committee structure
Director compensation
Director compensation table
Outstanding share-based awards and option-based awards for directors
Incentive plan awards for directors - Value vested or earned during the year
Share ownership guidelines of independent directors and chairman, president and chief executive officer
Ethical business conduct
Restrictions on insider trading
Diversity
Shareholder engagement
Largest shareholder
Transactions with Exxon Mobil Corporation

2023 Corporate governance highlights
Five of seven of our directors and our director nominees are independent and meet the criteria for independence set by Canadian securities regulators, the SEC and the NYSE American LLC.
The company delivered extensive orientation programs to better align with the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance’s policy, “Governance Differences of Equity Controlled Corporations”, in 2012,S.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren and G.J. Goldberg upon their election to the board for the first time in 2023.
The directors are highly qualified with diversity of gender, background, experience and skill.
The company’s independent directors have significant stock ownership requirements, all of which have been met (S.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren and G.J. Goldberg were each elected to the board on May 2, 2023 and are expected to meet the share ownership guidelines within five years from the date of their appointment). The independent directors collectively have nearly $7.8 million in shareholdings in the company.
The independent directors regularly meet in executive sessions without management present.
Shares of the company passed a resolution adopting a majority voting policy. Asare listed on the TSX and trade on the NYSE American LLC and our corporate governance practices comply with applicable policies and practices of each exchange.
97% average vote in favour for the election of our directors at the 2023 annual meeting.
Two of seven or 29% of the datedirector nominees, and 10 of this circular, Exxon Mobil Corporation holds 69.6 percent23 or 43% of the company’s shares. If Exxon Mobil Corporation’s shareholdings were ever to fall below 50 percent, the company’s policy provides that for any
non-contested
election of directors, any director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” in such election shall tender his or her resignation. Within 90 days after certificationexecutive officers of the election results, the board of directors will decide, through a process managed by the nominationscompany and corporate governance committee and excluding the nominee in question, whether to accept the resignation. Absent a compelling reason for the director to remain on the board, the board shall accept the resignation. The board will promptly disclose its decision and, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation.major subsidiaries, are women.

116
118

Corporate governance disclosure
Corporate governance at a glance
Controlled companyYes
Controlled company
Yes
Size of board
7
Number of independent directors
5
Women on board
(board and nominees)
2
Average attendance of directors at board and committee meetings
100%97%
Lead directorYes
Independent chair of the executive sessions
Yes
In camera sessions of independent directors at every board meeting
Yes
Independent status of audit committee
100%
Audit committee members financially literate
All
Independent status of executive resources committee
83%
Independent status of nominations and corporate governance committee
83%
Majority of independent directors on all committees
Yes
Individual director elections
Yes
Average tenure of director nominees (approximate)
83 years
Average age of director nominees (approximate)
6461 years
Mandatory retirement age
72 years
Majority voting policy
Yes
Separate board chair and CEO
No
Number of board interlocks
None
No director serves on more than two boards of another reporting issuer
Yes
Share ownership requirements for independent directors
Yes
Share ownership requirements for chairman and chief executive officer
Yes
Board orientation and education program
Yes
Code of business conduct and ethics
Yes
Board and committee charters
Yes
Position descriptions for the chairman and chief executive officer, lead director and the chair of each committee
Yes
Skills matrix for directors
Yes
Annual board evaluation process
Yes
Annual advisory vote on executive compensation
No
Dual-class sharesNo
Dual-class shares
No
Change of control agreements
No
117
119

Statement of corporate governance practice
The company continually reviews its governance practices and monitors regulatory changes.
This section provides information pertaining to our board, the committees of the board, ethics, diversity and shareholder engagement. The company is committed to high corporate governance standards and best practices. The company’s corporate governance policies and practices comply with and in most cases exceed the requirements of
National Instrument
52-110
Audit Committees
(NI
(NI 52-110),
National Policy
58-201
Corporate Governance Guidelines
(NP
(NP 58-201)
and
National Instrument
58-101
Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices
(NI
(NI 58-101).
The company’s common shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the NYSE American LLC and our corporate governance practices reflect the standards of these exchanges. In accordance with NYSE American LLC requirements for
non-U.S.
companies, the company is in compliance with NYSE American standards in all significant respects except as described on the company’s website at
www.imperialoil.ca.
Composition of our board nominees
78
1011
1314
More information on diversity, including on the board and among executive officers of the company, can be found at page 146.151.
118
120

Tenure of our board nominees
The board charter provides that incumbent directors will not be
re-nominated
if they have attained the age of 72, except under exceptional circumstances and at the request of the chairman. K.T. Hoeg and D.S. Sutherland have reached the company’s mandatory retirement age for directors in 2022. However, the ongoing
COVID-19
pandemic has given rise to a rapidly evolving business environment, has created new challenges in relation to health, safety, and operational integrity, and has impacted the timing and progress of the board’s director recruitment process. Given these exceptional circumstances, the board recognizes the value of stability and continuity as these challenges continue to evolve. Therefore, at the request of the chairman and in accordance with the board charter, the nominations and corporate governance committee supported, and the board approved, Ms. Hoeg and Mr. Sutherland’s nomination for
re-election
for one further year. Following the annual meeting of shareholders, the company will continue its director recruitment process and any announcements of new directors will be made as they are available.
The company does not have term limits for independent directors because it values the comprehensive knowledge of the company that long serving directors possess and independent directors are expected to remain qualified to serve for a minimum of five years.

The following chart shows the current years of service of the nominees for the board of directors and the year they would normally be expected to retire from the board.

Name of director nominee
Years of service on the board
Year of expected retirement from
the board for independent directors
 D.W. Cornhill6 years2026
  D.W. Cornhill
 B.W. Corson4 years2026
  B.W. Corson
2 years-
  M.R. Crocker
 S.R. Driscoll1 year-2034
 J.N. Floren1 year2031
 G.J. Goldberg1 year2031
  K.T. Hoeg
N.A. Hansen (a)
14 years2023
 M.C. Hubbs
35 years2039
  J.M. Mintz
17 years2023
  D.S. Sutherland
12 years2023
(a)N.A. Hansen is being nominated for election as a director at the annual meeting of shareholders and is not currently a director.
119
121

Skills and experience of our board members and nominees

Our directors and nominees bring a wide range of skills, diversity and experience.

The current directors and director nominees collectively have the experience and expertise required to ensure effective oversight, stewardship and governance of the company. The key areas of experience and skills for each of the nominees for election as directors can also be found in each of the nomineesdirector nominee tables on pages 112113 through 115117 of this circular.
The table below sets out the diverse skill set required of the board and identifies the particular experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills of each director and nominee that led the board to conclude that such person should serve as a director of the company.

D.W.
Cornhill
 
B.W.
D.W.
Cornhill
Corson
M.R.
Crocker
(a)
S.R.
B.W.
Corson
Driscoll
J.N.
Floren
G.J.
M.R.
Crocker
Goldberg
N.A.
Hansen
(b)
M.C.
K.T.
Hoeg
M.C.
Hubbs
J.M.
Mintz
D.S.
Sutherland
Leadership of large organizations
üüüüüüü
Operations / technical
üüüüü
Project managementüüüüüüü
Global experienceüüüüüüü
Strategy developmentüüüüüüüü
Project management
Global experience
Strategy development
Environment and sustainability
üüüüüüüü
Audit committee financial expert
üüü
Financial expertiseüüüüüüüü
Financial expertise
Government relations
üüüüü
Government relations
Academic / research
Information technology / cybersecurity oversight
üü
Executive compensationüüüüüüüü
Executive compensation
Risk management
üüüüüüüü

(a)M.R. Crocker is a current director and has chosen not to stand for re-election at the annual meeting of shareholders.
(b)N.A. Hansen is not currently a director and is being nominated for election as a director at the annual meeting of shareholders.
120
122

Independence of our board members and nominees

Five out of seven of the director nominees are independent.

The board is currently composed of seven directors, allsix of whom will be standing for
re-election
at the annual meeting of shareholders on May 3, 2022.April 30, 2024. M.R. Crocker is a current director and has chosen not to stand for re-election. N.A. Hansen is not currently a director and is being nominated for election as a director. The majority of the board and nominees (five out of seven) are independent. The independent directors and nominees are not employees of the company.

The board determines independence on the basis of the standards specified by
National Instrument
52-110
Audit Committees
(NI
52-110)
,
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules and the listing standards of the NYSE American LLC. The board has reviewed relevant relationships between the company and each nonemployee director and director nominee to determine compliance with these standards.
Based on the directors’ responses to an annual questionnaire, the board determined that none of the independent directors has any interest, business or other relationship that could or could reasonably be perceived to constitute a material relationship with the company. B.W. Corson is a director and chairman, president and chief executive officer of the company and not considered to be independent. The board believes that Mr. Corson’s extensive knowledge of the business of the company and Exxon Mobil Corporation is beneficial to the other directors and his participation enhances the effectiveness of the board.
M.R. Crocker is also a
non-independent
director as he is an employee of Exxon Mobil Corporation. Mr. Crocker has chosen not to stand for re-election at the annual meeting of shareholders. Director nominee, N.A. Hansen, holds the position of senior vice-president, energy products at ExxonMobil Product Solutions Company, a division of Exxon Mobil Corporation, and if elected will also be a non-independent director. The company believes that Mr. Crocker and Mr. Hansen, although deemed
non-independent
under the relevant standards by virtue of histheir employment, can be viewed as independent of the company’s management and that histheir ability to reflect the perspective of the company’s shareholders enhances the effectiveness of the board.
 
Name of director
(a)
and/or nominee
 
Management
Independent
Not
independent
 
Management
Independent
Not
independent
Reason for
non-independent
status
 D.W. Cornhill
ü
 B.W. Corson
ü
ü
B.W. Corson is a director and chairman, president and
chief executive officer of Imperial Oil Limited.
 M.R. Crocker
(a)
ü
M.R. Crocker is an employee of Exxon Mobil Corporation.
 S.R. Driscollü
 J.N. Florenü
 G.J. Goldbergü
 N.A. Hansen (b)
üN.A. Hansen is an employee of Exxon Mobil Corporation.
  K.T. Hoeg
 M.C. Hubbs
ü
  J.M. Mintz
  D.S. Sutherland
(a)M.R. Crocker is a current director and has chosen not to stand for re-election at the annual meeting of shareholders.
(b)N.A. Hansen is not currently a director and is being nominated for election as a director at the annual meeting of shareholders.
(a)
D.C. Brownell did not stand for
re-election
in 2021 and resigned from the board and its committees on May
 4, 2021, and was not independent during his tenure in 2021.
121
123

Committee membership of our board

Each standing committee is chaired by a different independent director and
all of the independent directors are members of each committee.
The chart below shows the company’s current standing committee memberships and the chair of each committee.

Director
Nominations
and corporate
governance
committee
Audit
committee
(b)
Safety and sustainabilitycommittee
(d)
Executive
resources
committee
Finance committee
(d)
 D.W. Cornhill (c)
üüüü
ü
Chair
Director
 B.W. Corson (a)
Nominations
and corporate
governance
committee
Audit
committee
(b)
Public policy
and corporate
responsibility
committee
Executive
resources
committee
Community
collaboration
and
engagement
committee
  D.W. Cornhill
(c)
 M.R. Crocker (a)
ü
Chair
üü
ü
  B.W. Corson
(a)
 S.R. Driscoll (c)
-ü
-
ü
Chair
ü-ü-
ü
  M.R. Crocker
(a)
 J.N. Floren
üü
-
ü
Chair
üü
 G.J. Goldbergüüü
ü
Chair
ü
  K.T. Hoeg
(c)
Chair
 M.C. Hubbs
(c)
Chair
  J.M. Mintz
Chair
  D.S. Sutherland
(c)
Chair
(a)
ü
Not independent directors.Chair
üüüü
(a)Not independent directors. M.R. Crocker is a current director and has chosen not to stand for re-election.
(b)
All members of the audit committee are independent and financially literate within the meaning of National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees and the listing standards of the NYSE American LLC.
(b)All members of the audit committee are independent and financially literate within the meaning of National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees and the listing standards of the NYSE American LLC.
(c)
Audit committee financial experts under U.S. regulatory requirements.
(c)Audit committee financial experts under U.S. regulatory requirements.
(d)In May 2023, the board of directors approved the creation of the finance committee, and dissolved the community collaboration and engagement committee with the ongoing responsibilities of this committee being assumed by the safety and sustainability committee. There were no meetings of the community collaboration and engagement committee in 2023 prior to its dissolution.
In addition to its standing committees, the board may establish ad hoc committees or special committees from time to time. On September 30, 2021, aOne special committee of independent directors was createdestablished in September, 2022 and remained active during 2023 for the purposes of considering certain matters. The special committee iswas chaired by D.W. Cornhill
and
consists consisted of the five independent directors. The special committee was dissolved in February, 2024.
124

Number of meetings
The chart below shows the number of board and standing committee meetings held in 2021.2023. This includes seven regular meetings and threeone additional special meetingsmeeting of the board. Due to public health recommendations and restrictions related to
COVID-19
and for the health and safety of our directors and employees, all meetings in 2021 were conducted virtually. More information on the board’s activities in relation to
COVID-19
can be found in the Risk oversight section starting on page 129.

Meetings of the board and standing committees in 2021:2023:

Graphic - Number of meetings (English) (jpeg for wdesk)1.jpg

(a)In February 2023, the public policy and corporate responsibility committee was changed to the safety and sustainability committee.
(b)In May 2023, the board of directors approved the creation of the finance committee, and dissolved the community collaboration and engagement committee with the ongoing responsibilities of this committee being assumed by the safety and sustainability committee. There were no meetings of the community collaboration and engagement committee in 2023 prior to its dissolution.

        
Board
10
 
        
Audit committee  Executive resources
committee
  Public policy and
corporate
responsibility
committee
  Nominations and
corporate
governance
committee
  Community
collaboration and
engagement
committee
5
 
  
6
 
  
3
 
  
7
 
  
1
 
122
125

Attendance of our board members in 2021
2023

100% 97% board and standing committee meeting attendance from all members.
The following chart provides a summary of the attendance record of each of the directors in 2021.2023. The attendance record of each director nominee is also set out in his or hertheir biographical information on pages 112 through 115.within the nominee section. The attendance chart also provides an overall view of the attendance per standing committee. Senior management directors and other members of management periodically attend standing committee meetings at the request of the committee chair.

Director
 
Board
 
Audit
committee
 
Executive
resources
committee
 
Safety and sustainability
committee
(a)(b)
Nominations
and
corporate
governance
committee
Finance committee (b)
Annual
meeting
 
Total
 
Percentage
by director
 
 D.W.
 Cornhill
8 of 85 of 58 of 85 of 56 of 6
5 of 5
(chair)
1 of 138 of 38100%
 B.W.
 Corson
8 of 8
(chair)
1 of 19 of 9100%
 M.R.
 Crocker
 8 of 88 of 8 5 of 56 of 6 5 of 5 1 of 133 of 33100%
S.R.
Driscoll (c)
4 of 42 of 2
(chair)
5 of 54 of 43 of 35 of 51 of 124 of 24100%
J.N.
Floren (c)
4 of 42 of 25 of 54 of 4
(chair)
3 of 35 of 51 of 124 of 24100%
G.J.
Goldberg (c)
4 of 42 of 2
5 of 5
(chair)
4 of 43 of 35 of 51 of 124 of 24100%
 K.T.
 Hoeg (d)
3 of 33 of 33 of 31 of 13 of 31 of 114 of 14100%
 M.C.
 Hubbs
8 of 85 of 57 of 85 of 5
5 of 6
(chair)
5 of 51 of 136 of 3895%
 J.M.
 Mintz (d)
3 of 33 of 33 of 31 of 13 of 31 of 114 of 14100%
 D.S.
 Sutherland (d)
2 of 32 of 32 of 31 of 12 of 31 of 110 of 1471%
 Percentage
 by committee
98%96%96%100%94%100%100%226 of 232
Overall
attendance
97%
(a)In February 2023, the public policy and corporate responsibility committee was changed to the safety and sustainability committee.
(b)In May 2023, the board of directors approved the creation of the finance committee, and dissolved the community collaboration and engagement committee with the ongoing responsibilities of this committee being assumed by the safety and sustainability committee. There were no meetings of the community collaboration and engagement committee in 2023 prior to its dissolution.
(c)S.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren and G.J. Goldberg were elected to the board and its committees on May 2, 2023.
(d)K.T. Hoeg, J.M. Mintz and D.S. Sutherland retired from the board and its committees on May 2, 2023. Prior to retirement, K.T. Hoeg was the chair of the audit committee, J.M. Mintz was the chair of the safety and sustainability committee, and D.S. Sutherland was the chair of the executive resources committee.
Director
 
 
Board
 
    
Audit
committee
 
    
Executive
resources
committee
 
    
Public policy
and corporate
responsibility
committee
 
    
Nominations
and
corporate
governance
committee
 
    
Community
collaboration
and
engagement
committee
 
    
Annual
meeting
 
    
Total
 
    
Percentage
by director
 
  D.C. Brownell 
(a)
 4 of 4  -  3 of 3  1 of 1  2 of 2  -  1 of 1  
11 of 11
  
100%
                 
  D.W. Cornhill
 10 of 10  5 of 5  6 of 6  3 of 3  7 of 7
(chair)
  1 of 1  1 of 1  
33 of 33
  
100%
                 
  B.W. Corson
 10 of 10
(chair)
  -  -  -  -  1 of 1  1 of 1  
12 of 12
  
100%
                 
  M.R. Crocker 
(b)
 6 of 6  -  3 of 3  2 of 2  5 of 5  1 of 1  -  
17 of 17
  
100%
                 
  K.T. Hoeg
 10 of 10  5 of 5
(chair)
  6 of 6  3 of 3  7 of 7  1 of 1  1 of 1  
33 of 33
  
100%
                 
  M.C. Hubbs
 10 of 10  5 of 5  6 of 6  3 of 3  7 of 7  1 of 1
(chair)
  1 of 1  
33 of 33
  
100%
                 
  J.M. Mintz
 10 of 10  5 of 5  6 of 6  3 of 3
(chair)
  7 of 7  1 of 1  1 of 1  
33 of 33
  
100%
                 
  D.S. Sutherland
 10 of 10  5 of 5  6 of 6
(chair)
  3 of 3  7 of 7  1 of 1  1 of 1  
33 of 33
  
100%
                 
  Percentage by
  committee
 
100%
  
100%
  
100%
  
100%
  
100%
  
100%
  
100%
  
205 of 205
  
Overall
attendance
100%
                 
(a)
D.C. Brownell did not stand for
re-election
in 2021 and resigned from the board and its committees on May 4, 2021.
(b)
M.R. Crocker was elected to the board and its committees on May 4, 2021.
123
126

Other public company directorships of our board members and nominees

No director or nominee serves on more than two boards of another reporting issuer.
The following table shows which directors and nominees serve on the boards of other reporting issuers and the committee memberships in those companies.

Name of

director
or nominee
Other reporting issuers of
which director or nominee
is also a director
Type of company
Stock
symbol:
Exchange
Stock
symbol:
Exchange
Committee appointments
 D.W. CornhillAltaGas Ltd.Diversified energy companyALA:TSXEnvironment, health and safety committee
 B.W. Corson
  D.W. Cornhill
 M.R. Crocker (a)
AltaGas Ltd.Diversified energy companyALA:TSXNo committees
S.R. DriscollEmpire Company LimitedFood retailingEMP.A:TSX
  B.W. Corson
----
  M.R. Crocker
----
  K.T. Hoeg
New Flyer Industries Inc.Manufacturer of heavy duty transit busesNFI:TSXAudit committee
  M.C. Hubbs
Nutrien Ltd.Fertilizer manufacturingNTR:TSX, NYSE (chair),
Nominating committee, and
Corporate governance and social responsibility committee
Gildan Activewear Inc.Apparel and LuxuryGIL:TSXAudit and finance committee, Compensation and human resources committee
J.N. FlorenWest Fraser Timber Co. LtdBasic Materials- Forest ProductsWFG:TSXHealth, safety and environment committee (chair), Human resources and compensation committee, and Governance and nominating committee
G.J. GoldbergBHP Group LimitedBasic Materials- Other industrial Metals and miningBHP:ASXSustainability committee (chair) and Nominations and governance committee
N.A. Hansen (b)
M.C. HubbsNutrien Ltd.Fertilizer manufacturingNTR:TSX, NYSEHuman resources and compensation committee and Safety and sustainability committee (chair)
  J.M. Mintz
----
  D.S.
  Sutherland
GATX Corporation
Commercial rail vehicles and aircraft engines – shipping
GMT:NYSE
Compensation committee (chair) and Governance committee
United States
Steel Corporation
Iron and steel
X:NYSE
Chairman of the board
(a)M.R. Crocker is a current director and has chosen not to stand for re-election at the annual meeting of shareholders.
(b)N.A. Hansen is not currently a director and is being nominated for election as a director at the annual meeting of shareholders.
Interlocking directorships of our board membersnominees
As of the date of this proxy circular, there are no interlocking public company directorships among the directors listed in this circular.    
nominees.
124
127

Director qualification and selection process
The nominations and corporate governance committee is responsible for identifying and recommending new candidates for board nomination. The committee identifies candidates from a number of sources, including executive search firms and referrals from existing directors. The process for selection is described in paragraph 1011 (a) of the Board of Directors Charter found in Appendix A of this circular. The committee will consider potential future candidates as required.
In considering the qualifications of potential nominees for election as directors, the nominations and corporate governance committee considers the work experience and other areas of expertise of the potential nominees, with the objective of providing for diversity among the nonemployee directors. The following key criteria are considered to be relevant to the work of the board of directors and its committees:
Work experience
Experience in leadership of businesses or other large organizations (Leadership of large organizations)
Operations/technical experience (Operations / technical)
Project management experience (Project management)
Experience in working in a global work environment (Global experience)
Experience in development of business strategy (Strategy development)
Experience with environmental, health, community relations and/or safety policy, practices and management (Environment and sustainability)
Experience in leadership of businesses or other large organizations (Leadership of large organizations)
Operations/technical experience (Operations / technical)
Project management experience (Project management)
Experience in working in a global work environment (Global experience)
Experience in development of business strategy (Strategy development)
Experience with environmental, health, community relations and/or safety policy, practices and management (Environment and sustainability)
Other expertise
Audit committee financial expert (also see the financial expert section in the audit committee table starting on page 133)
Expertise in financial matters (Financial expertise)
Expertise in managing relations with government (Government relations)
Experience in academia or in research (Academic / research)
Expertise in information technology and cybersecurity oversight (Information technology / cybersecurity oversight)
Expertise in executive compensation policies and practices (Executive compensation)
Expertise in oversight of risk management policies and practices (Risk management)
Audit committee financial expert (also see the financial expert section in the audit committee table starting on page 137)
Expertise in financial matters (Financial expertise)
Expertise in managing relations with government (Government relations)
Expertise in information technology and cybersecurity oversight (Information technology / cybersecurity oversight)
Expertise in executive compensation policies and practices (Executive compensation)
Expertise in oversight of risk management policies and practices (Risk management)
The nominations and corporate governance committee may consider the following additional factors in assessing potential nominees:
possessing expertise in any of the following areas: law, science, marketing, administration, social/political environment or community and civic affairs;
individual competencies in business and other areas of endeavour in contributing to the collective experience of the directors; and
providing diversity of age, regional association, gender and other diversity elements (including Aboriginal peoples, persons with disabilities and members of visible minorities).
possessing expertise in any of the following areas: law, science, marketing, administration, social/political environment or community and civic affairs;
individual competencies in business and other areas of endeavour in contributing to the collective experience of the directors; and
providing diversity of age, regional association, gender and other diversity elements (including Aboriginal peoples, persons with disabilities and members of visible minorities).
The nominations and corporate governance committee assesses the work experience and other expertise each existing director possesses and whether the candidate is able to fill any gaps in such experience, expertise and diversity of age, regional association, gender and other diversity elements. More detailed information on diversity of the board, including in connection with the director recruitment process that was completed in 2023, can be found at page 151. Consideration is also given to whether candidates possess the ability to contribute to the broad range of issues with which the board and its committees must deal, are able to devote the necessary amount of time to prepare for and attend board and committee meetings and are free of any potential legal impediment or conflict of interest.
Candidates are expected to remain qualified to serve for a minimum of five years and independent directors are expected to achieve ownership of no less than 16,500 common shares, deferred share units and restricted share units within five years of becoming an independent director.
When the committee is recommending candidates for
re-nomination,
it assesses such candidates against the criteria for
re-nomination
as set out in paragraph 1011 (b) of the Board of Directors Charter found in Appendix A of this circular. Candidates for
re-nomination
are expected not to change their principal position, the thrust of their involvement or their regional association in a way that would significantly detract from their value as a director of the corporation. They are also expected to continue to be compatible with the criteria that led to their selection as nominees. Under exceptional circumstances, the nominations and
125

corporate governance committee, on the request of the chairman, may continue to support the nomination of a director who has attained the mandatory retirement age.
128

K.T. HoegRecently, the board and D.S. Sutherland have reached the company’s mandatory retirement age for directors in 2022. As a result, thenominations and corporate governance committee did initiate acompleted an extensive director recruitment process in 2021, however, the ongoing
COVID-19
pandemic has given rise to a rapidly evolving business environment, it has created new challengesearly 2023 in relation to health, safety, and operational integrity, and it has impacted the timing and progressanticipation of three of the director recruitment process. In light of these considerations, the committee andthen-current directors reaching mandatory retirement age. Throughout this process, the board recognizereviewed the valuerecruitment progress on a regular basis, including discussing numerous candidates, conducting extensive interviews and ensuring that all board members had the opportunity to meet the candidates to ensure a strong fit for the board. It also included engaging executive search firms to cultivate a diverse selection of stability and continuity as these challenges continue to evolve. Therefore,potential nominees. This recruitment process resulted in accordance withthree new directors being elected at the board charter, the committee supported, and the board approved, Ms. Hoeg and Mr. Sutherland’s nomination for
re-election
for one further year. Following the2023 annual meeting, S.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren and G.J. Goldberg, all of shareholders,whom are standing for re-election at the committee will continue its director recruitment process and any announcements of2024 annual meeting. These new directors will be made as they are available.complement the board’s existing skillsets and expertise by providing additional experience in energy, business transition and capital allocation.
Director orientation, education and development

The company regularly provides
in-depth
presentations to the directors on relevant
and emerging issues and encourages continuing education opportunities.
The corporate secretary organizes an orientation program for all new directors. In a series of meetings over several days, new directors are briefed by staff and functional managers on all significant areas of the company’s operations, industry specific topics, risk oversight and regulatory issues. New directors are also briefed on significant company policies, organizational structure, security, information technology management and on critical planning and reserves processes. They also receive key governance and disclosure documents and a comprehensive board manual which contains a record of historical information about the company,
by-laws,
company policies, the charters of the board and its committees, other relevant company business information, information on directors’ duties and additional board related activities and calendars. Shortly after their election to the board, S.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren and G.J. Goldberg completed an extensive orientation program with the company’s corporate secretary and senior managers of various departments. Each new director participated in comprehensive onboarding sessions, including in-depth reviews of the company’s history, culture, practices, businesses and operations, risk framework, and ethics and other foundational policies, and in-depth reviews of legal and regulatory requirements, the Canadian climate framework, the company's emissions profile, emissions-related targets and plans for achieving such targets, and energy industry dynamics in general. With N.A. Hansen being nominated for election for the first time this year, the corporate secretary plans to provide an orientation shortly after his election to the board.
Continuing education is provided to board
Board and committee members participate in continuing education and maintain oversight over company operations through regular presentations by management, which focus on providing and discussing more
in-depth
information about key aspects of the business. Subject to exceptional circumstances, each year the board has an extended meeting that focuses on a particular area of the company’s operations and includes a visit to one or more of the company’s operating sites or a site of relevance. Due to public health recommendations and restrictions related to
COVID-19,
aThese site visit was not possible in 2021. The board continued to engage with management on pandemic specific topics such as response and mitigation plans and actions, health and safety initiatives, site-specific issues and strategic financialvisits help directors better understand the strengths and business actions in responseopportunities unique to various operations and markets across the country, and enhance the board’s perspective of the integrated nature of the company’s business. In 2023, the board visited the Calgary research centre ("CRC"), the Kearl site and the Strathcona refinery, for a tour of the facilities and discussions specific to the pandemic. More information onoperations and research at CRC, Strathcona and Kearl, including reviewing the board’s activitiesmitigations and community engagement in relation torespect of the Kearl environmental protection order.
COVID-19
can be found
Throughout 2023, one way in the Risk oversight section starting on page 129.
Further, with strengthening market conditions throughout the year, the board focused on strategic direction, operational priorities, capital allocation and enhancing shareholder returns. The board also reviewed and discussed the company’s various environmental, social and governance initiatives, including the company’s founding membership in the Oil Sands Pathways to Net Zero initiative.
Throughout 2021,which the board and its committees received regularexercised oversight was through regularly receiving and discussing presentations and updates that focused on performance, strategy and opportunities for the business. Some of these presentationssessions included ongoing reviews of upstream and downstream performance, plans and plans, numerousstrategies, regular reviews and consideration of the company’s monitoring, assessment, mitigations and engagement relating to the Kearl environmental reviews including Canada climate policy updates, sustainability report and disclosure and emissions performance reviews, safety performance reviews,protection order, internal audit reviews, a pension management review, a review of harassment in workplace policy stewardship, community engagement strategy, litigation reviews, conflict of interest and ethics reviews and a competition and anti-corruption reviewreview. Recognizing the importance of cybersecurity oversight for the company, the board also reviewed and an upstream research review. The board was also providedconsidered an information technology and cybersecurity update including strategic cybersecurity priorities, the evolving threat landscape, key security initiatives and metrics, business response plans, and mitigation efforts and system improvements throughout the year.
The board also reviewed presentations on the company’s risk assessment processes for forced labour and child labour in its supply chain to support implementation of Canadian disclosure requirements on this subject.
126

129

With strong market conditions and business performance throughout the year, the board focused on strategic direction, operational priorities, capital allocation and prioritizing shareholder returns. This included reviews and approval of renewal and acceleration of the company's normal course issuer bid and the completion of one substantial issuer bid during the year.
The board also maintained oversight over the company’s various environmental, social and governance initiatives throughout the year, including considering and discussing the publication of the company’s advancing climate solutions and sustainability reports and reviewing the company's surplus site management process. There was a continued focus by the board on the company’s progress with emissions reduction initiatives, including the company’s continued participation in the Oil Sands Pathways to Net Zero initiative and setting and tracking emissions reduction goals. The board also undertook reviews of disclosure and emissions performance, safety performance, Canada climate policy updates and a review of the company's regulatory compliance framework and management system. Please see the Risk oversight section for more information on the board’s role in relation to the environment.
Members of ExxonMobil’s management also provide reviews of various aspects of ExxonMobil’s global business. In 2021,2023, the directors received a presentationconsidered presentations on ExxonMobil’s global internal audit process and strategy, cybersecurity, update, as well as an overview of ExxonMobil’s researchcorporate strategy, and development efforts.
its Global Outlook.
MembersPrior to each board meeting, members of the board also receive and review an extensive package of materials prior to each board meeting that provides a comprehensive summary on each agenda item to be discussed. Similarly, the committee members also receive and review a comprehensive summary on each agenda item to be discussed by that particular committee. Informational communications and other written publications or reports of interest to the directors are also forwarded routinely.
The board members are canvassed as to whether there are any additional topics relevant to the board or to a specific committee that they would like to see addressed, and management schedules presentations covering these areas.areas for discussion. In addition, at every meeting the board receives an extensive update from the chairman, president and chief executive officer on business environment trends, relevant geopolitical activities, federal government priorities, key provincial issues and competitor activities, as appropriate.
Directors are encouraged to participate in other continuing education programs and events to ensure their skills and knowledge remain current.
In 2023, one or more directors participated in continuing education provided by third parties pertaining to, among other things, board oversight of climate change and the energy transition, corporate disclosures, corporate governance and ethics, risk management, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence and internal audit. Furthermore, the board recognizes the importance of the company's relationships with Indigenous communities and acknowledges the calls to action of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, and all of the independent directors have completed the "4 Seasons of Reconciliation" course provided by the Indigenous Continuing Education Centre of the First Nations University of Canada.
Board performance assessment
The board and its committees, as well as the performance of the directors, are assessed on an annual basis. For 2021,2023, the directors engaged in a performance assessment with the chairman, president and chief executive officer, which includes discussion and evaluation of the board and each committee’s effectiveness in various areas. The chairman, president and chief executive officer also meets regularly with directors individually to discuss any outstanding issues. The nominations and corporate governance committee discuss a summary of these assessment outcomes in the first quarter of each year.
Beginning in 2024, the lead director and the chairman, president and chief executive officer will together lead the annual performance evaluation of the board. More information about the new lead director position can be found in the section that follows, under the heading “Board and committee structure — Leadership structure”.
Board and committee structure
Leadership structure
The company has chosen to combine the positions of chairman, president and chief executive officer. The board believes the interests of all shareholders are best served at the present time through a leadership model with a combined chairman and chief executive officer position. position and an independent lead director selected by and from the independent directors.


130

Through more than 3840 years of experience with ExxonMobil and Imperial, the current chief executive officer possesses an
in-depth
knowledge of the evolving energy industry supply and demand fundamentals and the array of challenges to be faced by the company. The board believes that the extensive experience and other insights put the chief executive officer in the best position to provide broad leadership for the board as it considers strategy and exercises its fiduciary responsibilities. Further, the board has demonstrated its commitment and ability to provide independent oversight of management.
The company does not have a lead director. While the chairman of the board is not an independent director, K.T. Hoeg, chair of the executive sessions of the board, provides leadership for the independent directors. The duties of the chair of the executive sessions include presiding at executive sessions, reviewing and modifying, if necessary, the agenda of the meetings of the board in advance to ensure that the board may successfully carry out its duties, and acting as a liaison with the chairman of the board, including the provision of feedback, as appropriate, from the executive sessions. The position description of the chair of thechief executive sessions, as well as the purpose of those executive sessions, areofficer is fully described in paragraphs 9 (c) and (d)paragraph 14 (a) of the Board of Directors Charter attached as Appendix A.

In February 2024, the board established a lead director position to further enhance independent board leadership. D.W. Cornhill was appointed lead director. Prior to the formation of the lead director position, D.W. Cornhill provided leadership for the independent directors in his capacity as chair of the executive sessions of the board. It is normally expected that the same director will serve as lead director for a minimum of two years. The duties and responsibilities of the lead director include:
127
act as liaison with the chairman, in consultation with the other directors, (provided however that each director will also be afforded direct and complete access to the chairman at any time as such director deems necessary or appropriate);

provides feedback to the chairman;
chairs meetings of the board in the absence of the chairman;
reviews and approves the schedule and agenda for all board and committee meetings and reviews associated materials distributed to the directors;
advises the chairman as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of information flows;
working together with the chairman, oversees the annual performance evaluation of the board; and
working together with the chair of the executive resources committee, oversees the annual performance review of the chief executive officer.

Compensation for the lead director is determined by the board on the recommendation of the nominations and corporate governance committee and will be reviewed annually. Presently, the board has established the compensation for acting as lead director at $45,000 per year. The position description of the lead director is fully described in paragraph 8 of the Board of Directors Charter attached as Appendix A.
Independent director executive sessions
The executive sessions of the board are in camera meetings of the independent directors and are held in conjunction with every board meeting. These meetings are held in the absence of management. The independent directors held teneight executive sessions in 2021.2023. Following the establishment of the lead director position in 2024, the executive sessions of the board are chaired by the lead director. The purposes of the executive sessions of the board include the following:following and are more fully described in paragraph 10 of the Board of Directors Charter attached as Appendix A:
raising substantive issues that are more appropriately discussed in the absence of management;
raising substantive issues that are more appropriately discussed in the absence of management;
discussing the need to communicate to the chairman of the board any matter of concern raised by any committee or director;
discussing the need to communicate to the chairman of the board any matter of concern raised by any committee or director;
addressing issues raised but not resolved at meetings of the board and assessing any
follow-up
needs with the chairman of the board;
addressing issues raised but not resolved at meetings of the board and assessing any follow-up needs with the chairman of the board;
discussing the quality, quantity, and timeliness of the flow of information from management that is necessary for the independent directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties, and advising the chairman of the board of any changes required; and
discussing the quality, quantity, and timeliness of the flow of information from management that is necessary for the independent directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties, and advising the chairman of the board of any changes required; and
seeking feedback about board processes.
seeking feedback about board processes.

In camera sessions of the board committees
Various committees also regularly hold in camera sessions without management present. The audit committee regularly holds private sessions of the committee members as well as private meetings of the committee with each of the external auditor, the internal auditor and senior management as part of every regularly scheduled committee meeting.

131

Committee structure
The board has created five standing committees to help carry out its duties. Each committee is chaired by a different independent director and all of the independent directors are members of each committee. M.R. Crocker is also a member of each committee, with the exception of the audit committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors. B.W. CorsonMr. Crocker has chosen not to stand for re-election at the annual meeting of shareholders. It is anticipated that if elected, director nominee N.A. Hansen will also be a member of each committee, with the exception of the audit committee. In February 2023, the public policy and corporate responsibility committee was changed to the safety and sustainability committee. In May 2023, the board dissolved the community collaboration and engagement committee, with the ongoing responsibilities of that committee being assumed by the safety and sustainability committee.
At the same time, the board of directors approved the creation of the finance committee, reflecting the board’s responsibility for oversight of the company’s capital structure and allocation, financial policies, practices and strategies and significant investments.
Graphic - Committee Structure (current) (ENGLISH).jpg
Board committees work on key issues in greater detail than would be possible at full board meetings, allowing directors to more effectively discharge their stewardship responsibilities. The independent chairs of the five committees are able to take a leadership role in executing the board’s responsibility with respect to a specific area of the company’s operations falling within the responsibility of the committee he or she chairs. The board and each committee have a written charter that can be found in Appendix A of this circular. The charters set out the purpose, structure, position description for the chair, and the responsibility and authority of that committee, and are reviewed and approved by the board annually.
In addition to its standing committees, the board may establish ad hoc committees or special committees from time to time.

128

Table of Contents
132

Risk oversight
The company is governed by a comprehensive and well-established risk management system, and the company’s success in managing risk over time has been achieved through emphasis on execution of this disciplined management framework.

enterprise risk management_new_adj_darktext (edited)(jpeg for wedesk).jpg

The company’s risk management system includes a process for identifying, prioritizing, measuring, and managing the principal risks across the company, as well as assessing the company’s response to these risks. The system is implemented at multiple levels of the business through various policies, guidelines, processes and systems, including:
energy outlook scenarios;
strategic planning;
risk management guidelines;
code of ethics and standards of business conduct;
delegation of authority guidelines;
credit risk assessment guidelines;
controls and operations integrity management systems;
capital project management systems;
IT risk management (including information technology, systems and cybersecurity);
guidelines for the management and protection of information; and
business continuity plans.
energy outlook scenarios;
strategic planning;
risk management guidelines;
code of ethics and standards of business conduct;
delegation of authority guidelines;
credit risk assessment guidelines;
controls and operations integrity management systems;
capital project management systems;
IT risk management (including information technology, systems and cybersecurity);
guidelines for the management and protection of information; and
business continuity plans.
For a discussion on the company’s risk management in relation to executive compensation, see the Compensation discussion and analysis section starting on page 156.
129

Table of Contentssection.
133

Graphic - Risk management oversight (jpeg for wdesk).jpg
The chairman, president and chief executive officer is charged with identifying the company’s principal risks and ensuring appropriate systems are in place to manage these risks. The company incorporates external input in the identification and assessment of risks, including engaging directly with a variety of external stakeholders and communities, including policy makers, investors, customers, regulators, academics, Indigenous peoples, non-governmental organizations and industry associations on issues and opportunities of relevance to the company. These risks included energy transition risks, operational risks, environmental and sustainability risks, and policy risks.
The board of directors is responsible for reviewing the principal risks and overseeing the implementation of the risk management system, with the various committees assisting in risk oversight for issues that fall under their responsibility. This integrated risk management approach facilitates recognition and oversight of risk. For example, the audit committee oversees the company’s system of internal accounting and financial controls, and the executive resources committee oversees the compensation programs and practices in relation to risk management.management, and the finance committee oversees risk management in connection with capital allocation and expenditures.
The public policysafety and corporate responsibilitysustainability committee oversees the policies and practices that manage environment, health, safety and security risk. This includesThe committee regularly engages with senior management on climate matters and our environmental practices and performance, including reviews of, and briefings from subject-matter experts on, compliance with legislation and the assessment of public policy impacts on corporate performance, health and safety systems and performance, new technology developments, and the risks, actions and disclosure associated with climate change.change and the energy transition. In 2023, this included an in-depth review of the company’s regulatory compliance framework and management processes through its operations integrity management system. As part of this assessment, the committee reviews the company’s commitments to environmental sustainability priorities such as progressive reclamation, decommissioning and remediation, water conservation and use, air quality improvement, waste management and land use and biodiversity. Additionally, the committee and board provide oversight over the company's emission reduction goals and performance, including the company's target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions intensity (Scope 1, 2) for its operated oil sands facilities by 30 percent by 2030 (relative to 2016 levels). As part of the company’s efforts to provide solutions that lower the greenhouse gas emissions intensity of its operations and to provide lower life-cycle emission products to its customers, Imperial has also implemented a company-wide goal to achieve net-zero emissions (Scope 1, 2) by 2050 in its operated assets through collaboration with government and other industry partners.
The board of directors evaluates climate change risk in the context of overall enterprise risk, including other operational, strategic, and financial risks. The company considersImperial's board is actively engaged and committed to overseeing the interactions among these factorscompany's efforts as it pursues a strategy that is resilient to a wide range of potential pathways for society’s energy transition while continuing to grow shareholder value.

134

The board and its committees carry out their risk oversight responsibility through regular reviews and assessments. Topic-specific assessments, such as for compliance programs, controls, stewardship of business performance, regulatory changes, the company’s energy outlook, and climate risk and sustainability are conducted regularly and as necessary. The board carefully considers various factors and risks in connection with specific proposals for capital expenditures, budget additions and strategic initiatives, as well as in evaluating strategic plans.
130

Table Members of Contentsthe board ask questions of management to ensure risks are identified, assessed, mitigated, and monitored. Each typical year, the board also visits one or more of the company’s operating sites or locations of importance for the company to better understand issues associated with the company’s business.
In the annual planning process, consideration is given to a diverse set of risks and other factors that may influence future energy supply and demand trends, including technological advancements, regulation and government policies, climate change, greenhouse gas restrictions, and other general economic conditions. It also takes into account emerging industry and economic conditions and market and government policy uncertainties in developing its strategic plans and longer-term price views. Further, the board is responsible for ensuring the company’s strategic planning process is effective, and in doing so regularly reviews the process, key issues and various alternatives for future strategy development to inform updates. Business plans and strategies are reviewed on an annual basis and approved by the board.
Members of the board ask questions of management to ensure risks are identified, assessed, mitigated, and monitored. Each typical year, the board also visits one or more of the company’s operating sites or locations of importance for the company to better understand issues associated with the company’s business. However, a site visit was not possible in 2021 due to public health recommendations and restrictions related to
COVID-19.
COVID-19
in 2021
The
COVID-19
pandemic and market conditions within the energy industry starting in 2020 has placed a significant emphasis on the board’s role in risk oversight. Throughout 2021, the board remained fully engaged on the company’s extensive business and emergency response plans and health and safety protocols in response to
COVID-19.
The board continuously reviewed and discussed with management the impact of
COVID-19
and market conditions on performance, business strategies, employees and the community. The board also guided the company through improving market conditions while maintaining focus on the health and safety of the company’s employees, contract partners, customers and communities.
Each committee continued to support the board by holding reviews and discussions of
COVID-19
topics specific to their responsibilities. For example, the community collaboration and engagement committee oversaw numerous initiatives to support the community through this challenging period, including the second round of a free fuel promotion for healthcare workers and an initiative to promote mental health across Canada, among other initiatives.
The tabletables on the following pages provides additional oversight and other information about the board and its five standing committees:
131

Table of Contents
135

Board of directors
The board of directors is responsible for the stewardship of the corporation. The stewardship process is carried out by the board directly or through one or more of the committees of the board. The formal mandate of the board can be found within the Board of Directors Charter in Appendix A of this circular.
The board is satisfied that its activities over the year have fulfilled its mandate.
Directors
   B.W. Corson (chair)
   J.N. Floren
Directors
   D.W. Cornhill
   B.W. Corson
(chair)
   G.J. Goldberg
   M.C. Hubbs
   D.W. Cornhill
   J.M. Mintz
   M.R. Crocker
   D.S. Sutherland
   K.T. Hoeg
   M.R. Crocker
   M.C. Hubbs
   S.R. Driscoll
Number of
meetings
TenEight meetings of the board of directors were held in 2021,2023, which included threeone special meeting of the board. The independent directors hold executive sessions of the board in conjunction with every board meeting. These meetings are held in the absence of management. The independent directors held teneight executive sessions in 2021.
2023.
Board
Board
highlights in
2021
2023
●  Welcomed three newly elected directors to the board.
  Approved changes to the composition of the committees of the board and updated charters to reflect mandates of those committees.
●  Carried out site visits to Kearl, Stathcona refinery, and the Calgary research centre.
Engaged in active oversight of company’s response to Kearl environmental protection order
Regularly discussed industry activity, market updates and company initiatives.
Regularly discussed operational and project updates.
Regularly discussed risk management and business controls environment.
Regularly reviewed information technology, systems and cybersecurity strategies (including trends, risks, preparedness, mitigation, response, system improvements and business continuity strategies) to assess the security and integrity of the company’s information, systems and assets.
Discussed comprehensive company strategy for all business lines, including a focus on capital allocation and discipline.
   ApprovedImplemented various avenuesmechanisms for enhancing shareholder returns, such as increasing dividends and amending,the dividend, renewing and accelerating the company’s normal course issuer bid programs.program, and one substantial issuer bid.
  Provided oversight in support of safety, environmental performance and sustainability.
  Regularly discussed climate change policies, risks, opportunities and Imperial’sthe company’s climate strategy, including the company’s founding partnershipcontinued membership in the Oil Sands Pathways to Net Zero initiative.
●  Expanded existing mechanisms for recovering certain executive compensation in the event of a material negative financial restatement, by adopting new policy in compliance with new Rule 10D-1 of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
  Reviewed various stages of key projects such as Kearl in-pit tailings, Kearl autonomous haul vehicles, Cold Lake Grand Rapids Phase 1, Enhanced Bitumen Recovery Technology pilot, and approved Strathcona’s renewable diesel project, Sarnia products pipeline and Kearl’s in pit tailings project.
   Provided oversight of the company’s response to the
COVID-19
pandemic.
Role in risk
oversight
The company’s financial, execution and operational risk rests with management and the company is governed by well-established risk management systems. The board of directors are responsible for reviewing the company’s principal risks and overseeing the implementation of the appropriate systems to manage these risks. The board carefully considers these risks in evaluating the company’s strategic plans and specific proposals for capital expenditures and budget additions. It also approves and monitors compliance with the code of ethics and business conduct, and ensures that executive officers create a culture of integrity throughout the company. The board reviews the company’s information technology, systems and cybersecurity to ensure they adequately protect corporate information and assets. In 2021, the board’s role in risk oversight included the company’s continued response to the
COVID-19
pandemic, with a focus on the health and safety of the company’s employees, contract partners, customers and communities.
Disclosure
policy
The company is committed to full, true and plain public disclosure of all material information in a timely manner, in order to keep security holders and the investing public informed about the company’s operations. The full details of the corporate disclosure policy can be found on the company’s internet site at
www.imperialoil.ca
.
Independence
The current board of directors is composed of seven directors, the majority of whom (five of seven) are independent. The five independent directors are not employees of the company.
132

Table of Contents
136

Audit committee
The role of the audit committee includes selecting and overseeing the independent auditor, reviewing the scope and results of the audit conducted by the independent auditor, and assisting the board in overseeing the integrity of the company’s financial statements. In addition, the committee’s role includes overseeing the company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the quality and effectiveness of internal controls, approving any changes in accounting principles and practices, and reviewing the results of monitoring activity under the company’s business ethics compliance program. The formal mandate of the committee can be found within the Audit Committee Charter in Appendix A of this circular.
The committee is satisfied that its activities over the year have fulfilled its mandate.

Committee members
   S.R. Driscoll (chair)
   J.N. Floren
Committee members
   M.C. Hubbs (vice-chair)
   G.J. Goldberg
   K.T. Hoeg
(chair)
   J.M. Mintz
   D.S. Sutherland
   M.C. Hubbs
(vice-chair)
   D.W. Cornhill
   D.W. Cornhill
Number of meetings
Five meetings of the audit committee were held in 2021.2023. The committee members met in camera without management present and separately with the internal auditor and the external auditor at all regularly scheduled meetings. A
pre-audit
meeting also occurs prior to every regularly scheduled audit committee meeting with the chair of the audit committee and the chief financial officer and both the internal and external auditors.
Committee highlights in 2021
2023
   Reviewed and recommended for approval the interim and full year financial and operating results.
   Reviewed and assessed the company’s system of internal controls and auditing procedures, and the results of the internal auditor’s audit program.
   Reviewed and assessed the external auditor plan, performance and fees.
   Reviewed evolving regulations and reporting obligations.
   Reviewed the committee’s mandate and completed the committee self-assessment.
   Performed external auditor performance evaluation.
   Ensured the effectiveness of controls and procedures and integrity of financial statements was maintained while continuing to respond to the
COVID-19
pandemic.
maintained.
Financial expertise
The company’s board of directors has determined that D.W. Cornhill, K.T. Hoeg,S.R. Driscoll and M.C. Hubbs and D.S. Sutherland meet the definition of “audit committee financial expert”. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has indicated that the designation of an audit committee financial expert does not make that person an expert for any purpose, or impose any duties, obligations or liability on that person that are greater than those imposed on members of the audit committee and board of directors in the absence of such designation or identification. All members of the audit committee are financially literate within the meaning of
National Instrument
52-110
Audit Committees
and the listing standards of the NYSE American LLC.
Role in risk oversight
The audit committee also has an important role in risk oversight. The audit committee oversees risks associated with financial and accounting matters, including compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and the company’s financial reporting and internal controls systems. In addition, it reviews the scope of PricewaterhouseCoopers’ audit in light of risks associated with the energy industry, the regulatory environment and company-specific financial audit risks. The committee also reviews financial statements and internal and external audit results, and any changes proposed to accounting principles and practices. With respect to the
COVID-19
pandemic, the audit committee is also responsible for ensuring the reporting and internal controls are maintained as the company implements various response measures, including work from home arrangements.
Independence
The audit committee is composed entirely of independent directors. All members met board approved independence standards, as that term is defined in
National Instrument
52-110
Audit Committees
, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules and the listing standards of the NYSE American LLC.
137

133

Table of Contents
Executive resources committee
The executive resources committee is responsible for corporate policy on compensation and for specific decisions on the compensation of the chief executive officer and key senior executives and officers reporting directly to that position. In addition to compensation matters, the committee is also responsible for succession plans and appointments to senior executive and officer positions, including the chief executive officer. The formal mandate of the committee can be found within the Executive Resources Committee Charter in Appendix A of this circular.
The committee is satisfied that its activities over the year have fulfilled its mandate.

Committee members
   G.J. Goldberg (chair)
   S.R. Driscoll
Committee members
   D.W. Cornhill (vice-chair)
   J.N. Floren
   M.R. Crocker
   D.S. Sutherland
(chair)
   M.C. Hubbs
   K.T. Hoeg
   D.W. Cornhill
(vice-chair)
   M.C. Hubbs
   M.R. Crocker
   J.M. Mintz
None of the members of the executive resources committee currently serves as a chief executive officer of another company.
Number of
meetings
SixEight meetings of the executive resources committee were held in 2021.
2023.
Committee
Committee
highlights in
2021
2023
  Evaluated performance and approved compensation for CEO and other executive officers.
  Approved overall compensation budget and incentive program for the company.
  Reviewed new policy relating to new Rule 10D-1 of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for recovering certain executive compensation programin the event of a material negative financial restatement, and principles.related amendments to the short term incentive plan.
  Reviewed strategic work planning and talent strategy plans.
   Revieweda number of workforce and organizational changes.
   Reviewed harassment policy and process outcomes.
  Continued focus on succession planning for senior management positions.
   Appointed a senior vice-president and general auditor as part of normal succession.
Committee
members
relevant skills
and experience
D.W. Cornhill, K.T. Hoeg, M.C. Hubbs and D.S. SutherlandAll committee members had extensive and lengthy experience in managing and implementing their respective companies’ compensation policies and practices in their past role as chief executive officers or members of senior management. Mr.D.W. Cornhill, Ms. Hoeg, Dr. MintzS.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren G.J. Goldberg and Mr. SutherlandM.C. Hubbs serve or have served on compensation committees of one or more public companies. Accordingly, committee members are able to use this experience and knowledge derived from their roles with other companies in judging the suitability of the company’s compensation policies and practices.
Role in risk
oversight
The executive resources committee oversees the compensation programs and practices that are designed to encourage appropriate risk assessment and risk management.
Independence
Independence
The members of the executive resources committee are independent, with the exception of M.R. Crocker, who is not considered to be independent under the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Canadian securities rules and the rules of the NYSE American LLC due to his employment with Exxon Mobil Corporation. However, the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance’s policy, “Governance Differences of Equity Controlled Corporations”, views Mr. Crocker as a related director and independent of management and who may participate as a member of the company’s executive resources committee. Mr. Crocker’s participation helps to ensure an objective process for determining compensation of the company’s officers and directors and assists the deliberations of this committee by bringing the views and perspectives of the majority shareholder.
134

Table of Contents
138

Public policySafety and corporate responsibilitysustainability committee
The role of the public policysafety and corporate responsibility sustainabilitycommittee is to reviewoversee and monitor the company’s policies and practices in matters of the environment, health, safety, security and sustainability. The committee monitors the company’s compliance with legislative, regulatory and corporate standards in these areas, and reviews trends and current and emerging public policy. It also assesses the potential impacts of public policy, climate change, and stakeholder and Indigenous relations on corporate performance.
performance, and oversees the company's community investment activities including charitable donations.
The committee reviewsevaluates safety and environmental performance, incidents and trends on a regular basis to ensure the company’s focus on the safety of its employees, contractors and stakeholders and on operating in an environmentally responsible manner. It also provides oversight over sustainability and climate risk, including regular reviews and assessment of sustainability performance and initiatives, as well as climate risk within the company’s risk management system and the strategies to address these risks. The formal mandate of the committee can be found within the Public PolicySafety and Corporate ResponsibilitySustainability Committee Charter in Appendix A of this circular. The committee is satisfied that its activities over the year have fulfilled its mandate.

Committee
members
   J.N. Floren (chair)
   M.R. Crocker
Committee
members
   G.J. Goldberg (vice-chair)
   J.M. Mintz
(chair)
   S.R. Driscoll
   M.R. Crocker
   D.S. Sutherland
(vice-chair)
   K.T. Hoeg
   D.W. Cornhill
   M.C. Hubbs
   D.W. Cornhill
   M.C. Hubbs
Number of
meetings
ThreeFive meetings of the public policysafety and corporate responsibilitysustainability committee were held in 2021.
2023.
Committee
Committee
highlights in
2021
2023
 Personnel and process safety systems, performance and incident review.review, including ongoing oversight and guidance for mitigations and community engagement in respect of the Kearl environmental protection order.
 Environmental performance review (greenhouse gas, other air emissions, water consumption).
 Updates on material Canadian policy regulatory change, potential impactsdevelopments.
 Updates on Pathways Alliance carbon capture utilization and Imperial’s advocacy strategies (air quality, plastics, UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples).storage (CCUS) activities.
 Review of climate change policies, risks, potential impactsthe company’s Advancing Climate Solutions and Imperial’s advocacySustainability Reports and climate strategies.
   Review of Imperial’s Sustainability Report and related environmental, social and corporate governance disclosures and Imperial’sthe company’s disclosure strategy and plans.
● The company invested more than $17.5M in Canadian communities in 2022 as reported using the London Benchmark Group model – a global standard for measuring and reporting community investment.
● In 2023, the company contributed over $16.5M through community benefit agreements to Indigenous communities.
● The company surpassed $5 billion in spending with Indigenous business since 2008, achieving the highest annual Indigenous business spend in 2023.
● Celebrated 20 years of support for Indspire, an organization that invests in the education of First Nations, Inuit and Métis people in Canada in 2023. Through the company's support, Indspire has provided scholarships to more than 500 Indigenous students.
Role in risk
oversight
The public policysafety and corporate responsibility sustainabilitycommittee reviews and monitors the company’s policies and practices in matters of environment, health, personnel and process safety and security, which policies and practices are intended to mitigate and manage risk in these areas. This includes specific reviews with respect to climate risk and the company’s strategies to address these risks. It also includes pandemic and emergency response and continuity planning, which is a significant focus of reviews and discussions in relation to the
COVID-19
pandemic.health pandemics and epidemics. The committee receives regular reports from management on these matters.
Independence
Independence
The members of the public policysafety and corporate responsibilitysustainability committee are independent, with the exception of M.R. Crocker.


139

Nominations and corporate governance committee
The role of the nominations and corporate governance committee is to oversee issues of corporate governance as they apply to the company, including the overall performance of the board, review potential nominees for directorship and review the charters of the board and any of its committees. The formal mandate of the committee can be found within the Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee Charter in Appendix A of this circular. The committee is satisfied that its activities over the year have fulfilled its mandate.
Committee members
   M.C. Hubbs (chair)
   M.R. Crocker
Committee members
   J.N. Floren (vice-chair)
   S.R. Driscoll
●  D.W. Cornhill
   D.W. Cornhill
(chair)
   G.J. Goldberg
   K.T. Hoeg
   J.M. Mintz
(vice-chair)
   M.C. Hubbs
   M.R. Crocker
   D.S. Sutherland
135

Table of Contents
Number of meetings
SevenSix meetings of the nominations and corporate governance committee were held in 2021.
2023.
Committee highlights in
2021
2023
 Approval of the statement of corporate governance practices.
 Engagement in board and committee self-assessment.
   Recommendation Review of director compensation principles.
● Continued oversight and increase to share ownership requirements.
   Initiation and oversightcompletion of director recruitment process.process with three new directors joining the board upon election at the 2023 shareholder meeting.
● Recommendation for changes to the composition of the committees of the board and recommendations for changes to the charters to reflect mandates of those committees.
Role in risk oversight
The nominations and corporate governance committee oversees risk by implementing an effective program for corporate governance, including board composition and succession planning.
Independence
Independence
The members of the nominations and corporate governance committee are independent, with the exception of M.R. Crocker, who is not considered to be independent under the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Canadian securities rules and the rules of the NYSE American LLC due to his employment with Exxon Mobil Corporation. However, the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance’s policy, “Governance Differences of Equity Controlled Corporations”, views Mr. Crocker as a related director and independent of management and who may participate as a member of the company’s nominations and corporate governance committee. Mr. Crocker’s participation helps to ensure an objective nominations process and assists the deliberations of this committee by bringing the views and perspectives of the majority shareholder.
Community collaboration and engagementFinance committee
The role of the community collaboration and engagementfinance committee is to oversee all ofprovide oversight and guidance regarding the company’s community investment activities, including charitable donations.corporation’s capital structure/capital allocation, financial policies, practices and strategies. The formal mandate of the committee can be found within the Community Collaboration and EngagementFinance Committee Charter in Appendix A of this circular.
The committee is satisfied that its activities over the year have fulfilled its mandate.
Committee
members
D.W. Cornhill (chair)
● J.N. Floren
S.R. Driscoll (vice-chair)
G.J. Goldberg
M.R. Crocker
M.C. Hubbs
(chair)
Number of
meetings
Five meetings of the finance committee were held in 2023.
Committee
highlights in
2023
 Review and recommendation of the company’s corporate and finance plans including the capital budget.
  K.T. Hoeg 
(vice-chair)
 Review and recommendation of dividend declarations.
  M.R. Crocker
members
  D.W. Cornhill
  J.M. Mintz
  B.W. Corson
  D.S. Sutherland
 Review and recommendation of share buyback programs.
Role in risk oversightThe finance committee oversees risk by implementing and overseeing effective policies, practices and procedures, and by carefully considering various risk and other factors in connection with specific proposals for capital expenditures, budget additions and strategic initiatives and plans.
Number of
meetings
Independence
One meeting of the community collaboration and engagement committee was held in 2021.
   Imperial invested more than $11M in Canadian communities in 2020 as reported using the London Benchmark Group model – a global standard for measuring and reporting community investment.
   In 2021, Imperial paid more than $18.5M through community benefit agreements to Indigenous communities (2020:$17.5M).
   Recognized by the Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business with Silver level Progressive Aboriginal Relations (PAR) certification.
Committee
   Showed up for our communities in 2021 as
COVID-19
continued.
highlights in
2021
   Increased engagement with employee giving and volunteer matching ImpACT program – $600,000 given to 900 charities and
non-profits
across Canada.
   Provided $2.5M in free fuel vouchers to 100,000 front-line healthcare workers in Healthcare Heroes 2.0 campaign.
   Donated $200,000 to Canadian Mental Health Association branches across operating areas in Fuel What Matters 2.0 campaign.
   Donated $150,000 towards vaccine education in Athabasca, Cold Lake and Southern Ontario.
   Raised $2.9M in United Way campaign from employee/annuitant and corporate donations.
Independence
The majority of the members of the community collaboration and engagementfinance committee are independent, (five out of seven) with the exception of B.W. Corson and M.R. Crocker.
136
140

Table of Contents
Director compensation
Director compensation discussion and analysis

Directors’ compensation is intended to align the long-term
financial interests of the directors with those of the shareholders.

g259423g61o10 (1).jpg
Nonemployee director compensation levels are reviewed by the nominations and corporate governance committee each year, and resulting recommendations are presented to the full board for approval. The nominations and corporate governance committee decided not to use an external research firm to assemble the comparator data to determine compensation for the July 1, 2020 - June 30, 2021 period. The committee relied instead on an
internally-led
assessment to provide competitive compensation and market data for directors’ compensation, which assisted the committee in making a compensation recommendation for the company’s directors. The
internally-led
assessment included a review of industry survey data from benchmark companies, with this market data being provided by an independent external consultant. The internal assessment maintained the compensation design philosophy, objectives and principles, and was consistent with previous methodology used in this analysis.
Employees of the company or Exxon Mobil Corporation receive no extra pay for serving as directors. Nonemployee directors receive compensation consisting of cash and restricted stock units. Since 1999, the nonemployee directors have been able to receive all or part of their cash directors’ fees in the form of deferred share units. The purpose of the deferred share unit plan for nonemployee directors is to provide them with additional motivation to promote sustained improvement in the company’s business performance and shareholder value by allowing them to have all or part of their directors’ fees tied to the future growth in value of the company’s common shares. The deferred share unit plan is described in more detail on page 139.
137
143.

Table of Contents
141

Compensation decision making process and considerations
The nominations and corporate governance committee relies on market comparisons with a group of major Canadian companies with national and international scope and complexity. The company draws its nonemployee directors from a wide variety of industrial sectors and, as such, a broad sample is appropriate for this purpose. The nominations and corporate governance committee does not target any specific percentile among comparator companies at which to align compensation for this group.
The comparator companies included in the benchmark sample are as follows:

Energy
Non-energy
Energy
Non-energy
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Air Canada
 Cenovus Energy Inc.
BCE Inc.
  Cenovus Energy Enbridge Inc.
Bank of Nova Scotia
  Enbridge Inc.
BCE Inc.
  Ovintiv Inc.
Canadian National Railway Company
 Ovintiv Inc.
Nutrien Ltd.
 Parkland Fuel Corporation
Nutrien Ltd.
  Suncor Energy Inc.
Royal Bank of Canada
 Suncor Energy Inc.
Teck Resources Limited
 TC Energy Corporation
Sun Life Financial Inc.
Teck Resources Limited
TELUS Corporation
Thomson Reuters Corporation
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Hedging policy
Company policy prohibits all employees, including executives, and directors, from being a party to derivative or similar financial instruments, including puts, calls, or other options, future or forward contracts, or equity swaps or collars, with respect to the company or Exxon Mobil Corporation stock.
For a discussion on the process by which the compensation of the company’s executive officers is determined, see the Compensation discussion and analysis section starting on page 156.
158.
Compensation details
Board retainer
The compensation of the nonemployee directors is assessed annually.
Effective 2018, the nonemployee directors received an annualannually, and currently consists of a cash retainer for board membership of $110,000 per year, the retainer for each standing committee chaired was eliminated, and thea grant of restricted stock units was increased from 2,600 to 3,000. There were no changes to nonemployee director compensation from 2018 to 2021.units.
In 2021, the nominations and corporate governance committee reviewed and recommended a change to the compensation paid to the nonemployee directors. Effective July 1, 2021, theannual grant of restricted stock units, was increasedincreasing the grant from 3,000 to 3,300, with the annual retainer for board membership remaining at $110,000 per year. The board subsequently approved this recommendation.
During 2023, the committee recommended and the board approved no changes to nonemployee director compensation.
138

Table of Contents
142

The following table summarizes the compensation terms for the nonemployee directors in 2021:
2023:

 Director compensation
Director compensation
 Annual retainer terms: (a)
From July 1, 2020
to June 30, 2021
Effective July 1, 2021
 Cash retainer:
  Cash retainer:
 Board membership
$110,000 annually$110,000 annually
 Committee chairNone
    Committee chair
NoneNone
 Equity based compensation:
3,000 Restricted stock units3,300 units
    Restricted stock units
(which vest50% vests on each of the 5
th
and 10
th
(which vest on the 5
th
and 10
th
anniversary of date of grant)anniversary of date of grant)
(a)
The nonemployee directors may elect to take all or a portiondates of the cash retainer in the form of deferred share units. Nonemployee directors who are appointed to the board during any given year receive the full restricted stock unit grant and a prorated cash retainer based on the date of appointment.grant)
(a) The nonemployee directors may elect to take all or a portion of the cash retainer in the form of deferred share units. Nonemployee directors who are elected or appointed to the board during the year receive the full restricted stock unit grant and a pro-rated cash retainer based on the appointment or election date.
In addition to compensation for board membership, the board determines the compensation for special committee membership when the committee is established. For There was no cash retainer in connection with the special committee established on September 30, 2021, the board approved a 2021 cash retainer of $15,000 for the chair and $10,000 for members.that was in place during 2023.
Equity based compensation
Deferred share units
In 1999, an additional form of long-term incentive compensation (“deferred share units”) was made available to nonemployee directors. Nonemployee directors may elect to receive all or a portion of their cash compensation in the form of deferred share units.
The following table shows the portion of the retainer each nonemployee director elected to receive in cash and deferred share units in 2021.2023.

 Director
 
Election for 2023 director’s fees
in cash
(%)
 
 
Election for 2023 director’s fees in
deferred share units
(%)
 
D.W. Cornhill0100
S.R. Driscoll (a)
0100
J.N. Floren (a)
0100
G.J. Goldberg (a)
0100
K.T. Hoeg (b)
0100
M.C. Hubbs0100
J.M. Mintz (b)
0100
D.S. Sutherland (b)
0100

(a)S.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren, G.J. Goldberg were elected to the board and its committees on May 2, 2023.
(b)K.T. Hoeg, J.M. Mintz and D.S. Sutherland retired from the board and its committees on May 2, 2023.

143
  Director
  
 
Election for 2021 director’s fees
in cash
(%)
 
  
 
Election for 2021 director’s fees in
deferred share units
(%)
 
  D.W. Cornhill
  22  78
  K.T. Hoeg
  0  100
  M.C. Hubbs
  0  100
  J.M. Mintz
  0  100
  D.S. Sutherland
  0  100

The number of deferred share units granted to a nonemployee director is determined at the end of each calendar quarter for that year, according to the following calculation:
(i)the dollar amount of the nonemployee director’s fees for that calendar quarter that the director elected to receive as deferred share units;
(i)the dollar amount of the nonemployee director’s fees for that calendar quarter that the director elected to receive as deferred share units;
divided by
(ii)
the average of the closing price of the company’s shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange for the five consecutive trading days (“average closing price”) immediately prior to the last day of that calendar quarter.
(ii)the average of the closing price of the company’s shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange for the five consecutive trading days (“average closing price”) immediately prior to the last day of that calendar quarter.

139

Table of Contents
Those deferred share units are granted effective the last day of that calendar quarter.

A nonemployee director is also granted additional deferred share units to represent dividends on unexercised deferred share units. These additional units are granted on the dividend payment dates for the company’s common shares, according to the following calculation:
(i)the cash dividend payable for a common share of the company divided by the average closing price immediately prior to the payment date for that dividend;
(i)the cash dividend payable for a common share of the company divided by the average closing price immediately prior to the payment date for that dividend; multiplied by
(ii)
the number of unexercised deferred share units held by the nonemployee directors on the dividend record date.
(ii)the number of unexercised deferred share units held by the nonemployee directors on the dividend record date.
A nonemployee director may only exercise deferred share units by the end of the calendar year following the year of termination of service as a director of the company, including termination of service due to death. No deferred share units may be exercised unless all of the deferred share units are exercised on the same date. On the exercise date, the cash value to be received for the units is determined based on the company’s average closing price immediately prior to the date of exercise.
Restricted stock units
In addition to the cash fees described above, the company pays a significant portion of director compensation in restricted stock units to align director compensation with the long-term interests of shareholders. The restricted stock unit plan is described in more detail beginning on page 163.
164.
In 2016, theThe number of restricted stock units granted annually was increased in 2016 from 2,000 units to 2,600 units, in 2018 to 3,000 units, and in 2018 was increased to 3,000 units. In 2021 the number of restricted stock units granted annually was increased to 3,300 units.
Up until 2015, the vesting period for restricted stock units was 50 percent vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date (received in cash) and the remaining 50 percent vesting on the seventh anniversary of the grant date (with an option to receive in cash or common shares). In 2016, in order to better align the long-term financial interests of the directors with those of the shareholders, the vesting period was increased such that 50 percent vests on the fifth anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50 percent vests on the tenth anniversary of the grant date. For all the units to be vested, directors may elect to receive one common share for each unit or a cash payment for the units. The vesting periods are not accelerated upon separation or retirement from the board, except in the event of death.
In contrast to the forfeiture provisions for restricted stock units held by employees of the company, the restricted stock units awarded to nonemployee directors are not subject to risk of forfeiture at the time a director leaves the company’s board. This provision is designed to reinforce the independence of these board members. However, while on the board and for a
24-month
period after leaving the company’s board, restricted stock units may be forfeited if the nonemployee director engages in direct competition with the company or otherwise engages in any activity detrimental to the company. The board agreed that the word “detrimental” shall not include any actions taken by a nonemployee director or former nonemployee director who acted in good faith and in the best interest of the company.
Prior to vesting of the restricted stock units, the nonemployee directors receive amounts equivalent to the cash dividends paid to holders of common shares. The amount is determined for each cash dividend payment date by the following calculation:
(i)the cash dividend payable for a common share divided by the average closing price immediately prior to the payment date for that dividend;
multiplied
by
(ii)
the number of unvested restricted stock units held by the nonemployee directors on the dividend record date.    
(i)the cash dividend payable for a common share divided by the average closing price immediately prior to the payment date for that dividend; multiplied by
(ii)the number of unvested restricted stock units held by the nonemployee directors on the dividend record date.
Other reimbursement
Nonemployee directors are also reimbursed for travel and other expenses incurred for attendance at board and committee meetings.
140

Table of Contents
144

Components of director compensation
The following table sets out the details of compensation paid to the nonemployee directors in 2021.
2023.
Director
(a)
  
 
Annual
retainer for
board
membership
and special
committee
($)
(b)
 
  
Restricted
stock
units
(RSU)
(#)
  
Total
fees
paid in
cash
($)
(c)
  
Total value
of deferred
share units
(DSU)
($)
(d)
  
Total value
of restricted
stock units
(RSU)
($)
(e)
  
All other
compen-
sation
($)
(f)
  
Total
 compensation 
($)
  D.W. Cornhill
  125,000  3,300  27,500  97,500  145,464  20,209  290,673
  K.T. Hoeg
  120,000  3,300  0  120,000  145,464  65,389  330,853
  M.C. Hubbs
  120,000  3,300  0  120,000  145,464  20,829  286,293
  J.M. Mintz
  120,000  3,300  0  120,000  145,464  60,695  326,159
  D.S. Sutherland
  120,000  3,300  0  120,000  145,464  57,760  323,224

Director
(a)
 
Annual
retainer for
board
membership
($)
(b)
 
Restricted
stock
units
(RSU)
(#)
Total
fees
paid in
cash
($)
(c)
Total value
of deferred
share units
(DSU)
($)
(d)
Total value
of restricted
stock units
(RSU)
($)
(e)
All other
compen-
sation
($)
(f)
Total
 compensation
($)
D.W. Cornhill110,0003,300110,000254,49658,331422,827
S.R. Driscoll82,5003,30082,500254,496673337,669
J.N. Floren82,5003,30082,500254,496673337,669
G.J. Goldberg82,5003,30082,500254,496673337,669
K.T. Hoeg (b)
55,00055,00085,346140,346
M.C. Hubbs110,0003,300110,000254,49662,032426,528
J.M. Mintz (b)
55,00055,00080,009135,009
D.S. Sutherland (b)
55,00055,000102,176157,176
(a)As directors employed by the company or Exxon Mobil Corporation in 2023, B.W. Corson and M.R. Crocker did not receive compensation for acting as directors. S.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren, G.J. Goldberg were elected to the board on May 2, 2023. and their “Annual retainer for board membership” has been pro-rated accordingly.
(b)K.T. Hoeg, J.M. Mintz and D.S. Sutherland retired from the board on May 2, 2023 and their “Annual retainer for board membership” has been prorated accordingly.
(a)
As directors employed by the company or Exxon Mobil Corporation in 2021, B.W. Corson, D.C. Brownell and M.R. Crocker did not receive compensation for acting as directors.
(b)
D.W. Cornhill is chair of the special committee.
(c)
“Total fees paid in cash” is the portion of the “Annual retainer for board membership and special committee”(c)“Total fees paid in cash” is the portion of the “Annual retainer for board membership” that the director elected to receive as cash. This amount is reported as “Fees earned” in the Director compensation table on page 142.
(d)
“Total value of deferred share units” is the portion of the “Annual retainer for board membership and special committee” that the director elected to receive as deferred share units, as set out in the previous table on page 139. This amount plus the “Total value of restricted stock units” amount is shown as “Share-based awards” in the Director compensation table on page 142.
(e)
The values of the restricted stock units shown are the number of units multiplied by the closing price of the company’s shares on the date of grant, December 6, 2021 ($44.08).
(f)
Amounts under “All other compensation” consist of dividend equivalent payments on unvested restricted stock units and the value of additional deferred share units granted in lieu of dividends on unvested deferred share units. In 2021, D.W. Cornhill received $10,708 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units and additional deferred share units valued at $9,501 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units. K.T. Hoeg received $15,436 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units and additional deferred share units valued at $49,953 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units. M.C. Hubbs received $8,160 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units and additional deferred share units valued at $12,669 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units. J.M. Mintz received $15,436 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units and additional deferred share units valued at $45,259 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units. D.S. Sutherland received $15,436 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units and additional deferred share units valued at $42,324 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units.
141

Table of Contents
Director compensation table on page 146.
(d)“Total value of deferred share units” is the portion of the “Annual retainer for board membership” that the director elected to receive as deferred share units, as set out in the previous table on page 143. This amount plus the “Total value of restricted stock units” amount is shown as “Share-based awards” in the Director compensation table on page 146.
(e)The values of the restricted stock units shown are the number of units multiplied by the closing price of the company’s shares on the date of grant, December 4, 2023 ($77.12).
(f)Amounts under “All other compensation” consist of dividend equivalent payments on unvested restricted stock units, the value of additional deferred share units granted in lieu of dividends on unvested deferred share units, and the value of premiums paid by the company for accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) insurance. In 2023, D.W. Cornhill received $30,892 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units, additional deferred share units valued at $27,307 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units and insurance premiums of $132. S.R Driscoll received additional deferred share units valued at $585 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units and insurance premiums of $88. J.N. Floren received additional deferred share units valued at $585 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units and insurance premiums of $88. G.J. Goldberg received additional deferred share units valued at $585 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units and insurance premiums of $88. K.T. Hoeg received $33,776 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units, additional deferred share units valued at $51,526 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units, and insurance premiums of $44. M.C. Hubbs received $27,876 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units, additional deferred share units valued at $34,024 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units, and insurance premiums of $132. J.M. Mintz received $33,776 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units, additional deferred share units valued at $46,189 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units, and insurance premiums of $44. D.S. Sutherland received $33,776 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units, additional deferred share units valued at $68,356 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units, and insurance premiums of $44.

145

Director compensation table
The following table summarizes the compensation paid, payable, awarded or granted for 20212023 to each of the nonemployee directors of the company.

Name
(a)
  
Fees
earned
($)(b)
  
Share-
based
awards
($) (c)
  
Option-
based
awards
($)
  
Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation
($)
  
Pension
value
($)
  
All other
compensation
($) (d)
  
Total
($)
Name
(a)
Fees
earned
($)(b)
Share-
based
awards
($) (c)
Option-
based
awards
($)
Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation
($)
Pension
value
($)
All other
compensation
($) (d)
Total
($)
D.W. Cornhill
  27,500  242,964  -  -  -  20,209  290,673  D.W. Cornhill364,49658,331422,827
S.R. DriscollS.R. Driscoll336,996673337,669
J.N. FlorenJ.N. Floren336,996673337,669
G.J. GoldbergG.J. Goldberg336,996673337,669
K.T. Hoeg
  0  265,464  -  -  -  65,389  330,853  K.T. Hoeg55,00085,346140,346
M.C. Hubbs
  0  265,464  -  -  -  20,829  286,293  M.C. Hubbs364,49662,032426,528
J.M. Mintz
  0  265,464  -  -  -  60,695  326,159  J.M. Mintz55,00080,009135,009
D.S. Sutherland
  0  265,464  -  -  -  57,760  323,224  D.S. Sutherland55,000102,176157,176
(a)
As directors employed by the company or Exxon Mobil Corporation in 2021, B.W. Corson, D.C. Brownell and M.R. Crocker did not receive compensation for acting as directors.
(b)
Represents all fees awarded, earned, paid or payable in cash for services as a director. The nonemployee directors are able to receive all or part of their directors’ fees in the form of deferred share units.
(c)
Represents the value of the restricted stock units (calculated by multiplying the number of units by the closing price of the company’s shares on the date of grant), plus the value of deferred share units (calculated by the portion of the “Annual retainer for board membership and special committee” that the director elected to receive as deferred share units as noted on page 139).
(d)
Amounts under “All other compensation” consist of dividend equivalent payments on unvested restricted stock units and the value of additional deferred share units granted in lieu of dividends on unvested deferred share units. In 2021, D.W. Cornhill received $10,708 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units and additional deferred share units valued at $9,501 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units. K.T. Hoeg received $15,436 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units and additional deferred share units valued at $49,953 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units. M.C. Hubbs received $8,160 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units and additional deferred share units valued at $12,669 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units. J.M. Mintz received $15,436 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units and additional deferred share units valued at $45,259 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units. D.S. Sutherland received $15,436 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units and additional deferred share units valued at $42,324 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units.
(a)As directors employed by the company or Exxon Mobil Corporation in 2023, B.W. Corson and M.R. Crocker did not receive compensation for acting as directors. S.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren, G.J. Goldberg were elected to the board on May 2, 2023. and their compensation has been pro-rated accordingly. K.T. Hoeg, J.M. Mintz and D.S. Sutherland retired from the board on May 2, 2023 and their compensation has been pro-rated accordingly.
 
 
Five-year look back at total compensation paid to nonemployee directors
 
Year
  
 
Amount
($)
 
2017
  1,351,454
2018
  1,500,739
2019
  1,251,395
2020
  1,073,527
2021
  1,557,202
(b)Represents all fees awarded, earned, paid or payable in cash for services as a director. The nonemployee directors are able to receive all or part of their directors’ fees in the form of deferred share units.
(c)Represents the value of the restricted stock units (calculated by multiplying the number of units by the closing price of the company’s shares on the date of grant), plus the value of deferred share units (calculated by the portion of the “Annual retainer for board membership” that the director elected to receive as deferred share units as noted on page 143).
142
(d)Amounts under “All other compensation” consist of dividend equivalent payments on unvested restricted stock units, the value of additional deferred share units granted in lieu of dividends on unvested deferred share units, and the value of premiums paid by the company for accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) insurance. In 2023, D.W. Cornhill received $30,892 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units, additional deferred share units valued at $27,307 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units and insurance premiums of $132. S.R Driscoll received additional deferred share units valued at $585 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units and insurance premiums of $88. J.N. Floren received additional deferred share units valued at $585 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units and insurance premiums of $88. G.J. Goldberg received additional deferred share units valued at $585 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units and insurance premiums of $88. K.T. Hoeg received $33,776 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units, additional deferred share units valued at $51,526 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units, and insurance premiums of $44. M.C. Hubbs received $27,876 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units, additional deferred share units valued at $34,024 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units, and insurance premiums of $132. J.M. Mintz received $33,776 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units, additional deferred share units valued at $46,189 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units, and insurance premiums of $44. D.S. Sutherland received $33,776 in dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units, additional deferred share units valued at $68,356 in lieu of dividends on deferred share units, and insurance premiums of $44.

146

 
 
Five-year look back at total compensation paid to nonemployee directors
 
Year
 
Amount
($)
 
20191,251,395
20201,073,527
20211,557,202
20222,153,807
20232,294,893
Outstanding share-based awards and option-based awards for directors
The following table sets forth all outstanding awards held by nonemployee directors of the company as at December 31, 20212023 and does not include common shares owned by the director.

     
Option-based awards
     
Share-based awards
 Option-based awards Share-based awards
Name
(a)
  
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
(#)
  
Option
exercise
price
($)
  
Option
expiration
date
  
Value of
unexercised
in-the-
money
options
($)
  
Number of
shares or units
of shares that
have not
vested
(#) (b)
  
Market or
payout value
  of share-based  

awards that
have not
vested
($) (c)
Name
(a)
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
(#)
Option
exercise
price
($)
Option
expiration
date
Value of
unexercised
in-the-
money
options
($)
Number of
shares or units
of shares that
have not
vested
(#) (c)
Market or
payout value
 of share-based
awards that
have not
vested
($) (d)
D.W. Cornhill
  -  -  -  -  25,853  1,179,429   D.W. Cornhill33,9172,560,055
K.T. Hoeg
  -  -  -  -  68,361  3,118,644  
S.R. Driscoll S.R. Driscoll4,422333,773
J.N. Floren J.N. Floren4,422333,773
G.J. Goldberg G.J. Goldberg4,422333,773
K.T. Hoeg (b)
K.T. Hoeg (b)
16,7001,260,516
M.C. Hubbs
  -  -  -  -  26,683  1,217,292   M.C. Hubbs36,1362,727,545
J.M. Mintz
  -  -  -  -  63,730  2,907,383  
D.S. Sutherland
  -  -  -  -  60,836  2,775,346  
J.M. Mintz (b)
J.M. Mintz (b)
16,7001,260,516
D.S. Sutherland (b)
D.S. Sutherland (b)
16,7001,260,516
(a)As directors employed by the company or Exxon Mobil Corporation in 2023, B.W. Corson and M.R. Crocker did not receive compensation for acting as directors. S.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren and G.J. Goldberg were elected to the board on May 2, 2023.
(b)K.T. Hoeg, J.M. Mintz and D.S. Sutherland retired from the board on May 2, 2023.
(c)Represents restricted stock units and deferred share units held as of December 31, 2023.
(a)
As directors employed by the company or Exxon Mobil Corporation in 2021, B.W. Corson, D.C. Brownell and M.R. Crocker did not receive compensation for acting as directors.
(d)Value is based on the closing price of the company’s shares on December 31, 2023 ($75.48). For K.T. Hoeg, J.M. Mintz and D.S. Sutherland, the value represents restricted stock units held as of December 31, 2023, as each of them exercised their deferred share units by the end of the 2023.
(b)
Represents restricted stock units and deferred share units held as of December 31, 2021.
(c)
Value is based on the closing price of the company’s shares on December 31, 2021 ($45.62).

147

Incentive plan awards for directors - Value vested or earned during the year
The following table sets forth the value of the awards that vested or were earned by each nonemployee director of the company in 2021.
2023.

Name
(a)
Option-based awards

Value
–Value vested during
the year
($)
Share-based awards – Value

vested during the year
($) (b)
 Non-equity incentive plan

compensation – Value
earned during the year
($)
 D.W. Cornhill116,211
  D.W. Cornhill
 S.R. Driscoll
---
 J.N. Floren
 G.J. Goldberg
 K.T. Hoeg-3,914,11798,545-
 M.C. Hubbs116,211
  M.C. Hubbs
 J.M. Mintz
-3,595,688--
  J.M. Mintz
-98,545-
 D.S. Sutherland
-3,438,08498,545-
(a)As directors employed by the company or Exxon Mobil Corporation in 2023, B.W. Corson and M.R. Crocker did not receive compensation for acting as directors. S.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren and G.J. Goldberg were elected to the board on May 2, 2023. K.T. Hoeg, J.M. Mintz and D.S. Sutherland retired from the board on May 2, 2023.
(b)Represents restricted stock units granted in 2016 and 2018, which vested in 2023. Value is based on the average of the weighted-average price (as determined by the Toronto Stock Exchange) of common shares of the company on the vesting date and the four consecutive trading days immediately prior to the vesting date. For K.T. Hoeg, the value also includes 55,991.53 deferred share units that were exercised on May 3, 2023 after her retirement, at a price of $67.83 which was the weighted average price of common shares of the company on the five consecutive trading days immediately prior to the exercise date.For J.M. Mintz, the value also includes 50,237.90 deferred share units that were exercised on May 2, 2023 after his retirement, at a price of $69.26 which was the weighted average price of common shares of the company on the five consecutive trading days immediately prior to the exercise date. For D.S. Sutherland, the value also includes 48,551.19 deferred share units that were exercised on July 28, 2023 after his retirement, at a price of $68.42 which was the weighted average price of common shares of the company on the five consecutive trading days immediately prior to the exercise date.
(a)
As directors employed by the company or Exxon Mobil Corporation in 2021, B.W. Corson, D.C. Brownell and M.R. Crocker did not receive compensation for acting as directors.
(b)
Represents restricted stock units granted in 2014 and 2016, which vested in 2021. Value is based on the average of the weighted average price (as determined by the Toronto Stock Exchange) of common shares of the company on the vesting date and the four consecutive trading days immediately prior to the vesting date.
143
148

Table of Contents
Share ownership guidelines of independent directors and chairman, president and chief executive officer
In 2021, to reflect the increase in restricted stock units granted annually to independent directors, the board approved an increase in the independent director share ownership guidelines from 15,000 shares to 16,500 shares. Independent directors are required to hold the equivalent of at least 16,500 shares of Imperial Oil Limited, including common shares, deferred share units and restricted stock units, within five years from the date of appointment tojoining the board.
The chairman, president and chief executive officer has separate share ownership requirements and must, within three years of his appointment, acquire shares of the company, including common shares and restricted stock units, of a value of no less than five times his base salary.
The board of directors believes that these share ownership guidelines will result in an alignment of the interests of board members with the interests of all other shareholders. As of the date of this circular, the independent directors currently have holdings of 313,96395,819 shares which is more than three timesmeets the required guideline.
Minimum share ownership
requirement
Time to fulfill
Chairman, president and chief executive
officer
5 x base salaryWithin 3 years of appointment
Independent directors16,500 sharesWithin 5 years of initial appointment
The chart below shows the shareholdings of the independent directors and the chairman, president and chief executive officer of the company as of February 15, 2022,2024, the record date of the management proxy circular.
Director
  
Director
since
  
Amount
acquired
since last
report
(February 17,
2021 to
February 15,
2022)
 (#)
  
 
Total
holdings
(includes
commo
n shares,
deferred share
units and
restricted stock
units)
(#)
 
  
Market
value of
total
holdings
(a) ($)
  
Minimum
shareholding
requirement
  
Minimum
  requirement  
met
  D.W. Cornhill
  November 29, 2017  6,069  38,353  2,140,097  16,500  Yes
  B.W. Corson
  September 17, 2019  78,200  234,600  13,090,680  Five times base salary  Yes
  K.T. Hoeg
  May 1, 2008  5,448  68,361  3,814,544  16,500  Yes
  M.C. Hubbs
  July 26, 2018  6,770  26,683  1,488,911  16,500  Yes
  J.M. Mintz
  April 21, 2005  5,325  64,730  3,611,934  16,500  Yes
  D.S. Sutherland
  April 29, 2010  5,248  115,836  6,463,649  16,500  Yes
  Total accumulated holdings
  (#) and value of directors’
  holdings ($)
    
548,563
  
$30,609,815
    
(a)
The amount shown in the column “Market value of total holdings” is equal to the “Total holdings” multiplied by the closing price of the company’s shares on the proxy circular record date February 15, 2022 ($55.80).
Director
Director
since
Amount
acquired
since last
report
(February 9,
2023 to
February 15, 2024) (#)
 
Total
holdings
(includes
common shares,
deferred share
units and
restricted stock
units) (#)
 
Market
value of
total
holdings
(a) ($)
Minimum
shareholding
requirement
Minimum
 requirement
met
 D.W. CornhillNovember 29, 20173,70946,4173,773,70216,500Yes
 B.W. CorsonSeptember 17, 201986,800410,40033,365,520Five times base salaryYes
 S.R. DriscollMay 2, 20234,4224,422359,50916,500
Yes (b)
 J.N. FlorenMay 2, 20234,4224,422359,50916,500
Yes (b)
 G.J. GoldbergMay 2, 20234,4224,422359,50916,500
Yes (b)
 M.C. HubbsJuly 26, 20183,80136,1362,937,85716,500Yes
Total accumulated holdings (#) and
value of directors’ holdings ($)
506,21941,155,606

(a)The amount shown in the column “Market value of total holdings” is equal to the “Total holdings” multiplied by the closing price of the company’s shares on the proxy circular record date February 15, 2024 ($81.30).
(b)S.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren and G.J. Goldberg were elected to the board on May 2, 2023 and are expected to meet the share ownership guidelines for independent directors of 16,500 shares within the required five years from such date.
For information relating to compensation of the company’s named executive officers, see the Compensation discussion and analysis section starting on page 156.158.

144
149

Table of Contents
Ethical business conduct

The company is committed to high ethical standards through its policies and practices.
The company’s directors, officers and employees are responsible for developing, approving and implementing plans and actions designed to achieve corporate objectives. In doing so, they are expected to observe the highest standards of integrity in the conduct of the company’s business, with the methods employed to attain results being as important as the results themselves.
The board has adopted a written code of ethics and business conduct (the “Code”) which can be found on the company’s website at
www.imperialoil.ca/en-CA/Investors/Investor-relations
, including any applicable amendments. The Code applies to each of the company’s directors, officers and employees, and consists of the ethics policy, the conflicts of interest policy, the corporate assets policy, the directorships policy and the procedures and open door communication. No person in the company has the authority to make exceptions or grant waivers with respect to its foundational policies. There have been no material change reports filed in the past 12 months pertaining to conduct of a director or executive officer that constitute a departure from the Code. In addition, the directors of the company must comply with the conflict of interest provisions of the
Canada Business Corporations Act,
as well as the relevant securities regulatory instruments, in order to ensure that the directors exercise independent judgment in considering transactions and agreements in respect of which such director has a material interest.
Under the company’s procedures and open door communication, employees are encouraged and expected to refer suspected violations of the law, company policy or internal controls and procedures by various means, including to their supervisors or the company’s ethics advisor, controller or general auditor. Imperial also has an ethics “hotline” that is operated by a third-party service provider and offers confidential, anonymous reporting 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Suspected violations involving a director or executive officer, as well as any concern regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters are to be referred directly to the internal auditor. The audit committee initially reviews all issues involving directors or executive officers, and then refers all issues to the board of directors. In the alternative, employees may also address concerns to individual nonemployee directors or to nonemployee directors as a group. No action may be taken or threatened against employees for asking questions, voicing concerns, or making complaints or suggestions in good faith.
Management provides the board of directors with a review of corporate ethics and conflicts of interest on an annual basis. The company’s internal auditors audit each business line’s compliance with the program and report to the audit committee. Directors, officers and employees review the company’s standards of business conduct (which includes the Code) on an annual basis, with independent directors and all employees being required to sign a declaration card confirming that they have read and are familiar with the standards of business conduct. In addition, every four years a business practices review is conducted in which managers review the standards of business conduct with all employees in their respective work units.
The board, through its audit committee, examines the effectiveness of the company’s internal control processes and management information systems. The board consults with the external auditor, the internal auditor and the management of the company to ensure the integrity of the systems.
There are a number of structures and processes in place to facilitate the functioning of the board independently of management. The board has a majority of independent directors. Each committee is chaired by a different independent director and all of the independent directors are members of each committee. The audit committee is composed entirely of independent directors. Each other committee (except the community collaboration and engagement committee) is composed entirely of the independent directors and M.R. Crocker, who is an employee of Exxon Mobil Corporation and although deemed
non-independent
under the relevant standards by virtue of his employment, is viewed as independent of the company’s management. It is anticipated that if elected, director nominee N.A.Hansen will also be a member of each committee, with the exception of the audit committee, and although Mr. Hansen will be deemed non-independent under the relevant standards by virtue of his employment with Exxon Mobil Corporation, he will be viewed as independent of the company’s management.

150

The agendas of each of the board and its committees are not set by management alone, but by the board as a whole and by each committee. A significant number of agenda items are mandatory and recurring. Board meetings are scheduled at least one full year in advance. Any director may call a meeting of the board or a meeting of a committee of which the director is a member. There is a board-prescribed flow of financial, operating and other corporate information to all directors. The board may also utilize ad hoc or special committees when considering various matters.
145

Table of Contents
The independent directors conduct executive sessions in the absence of members of management. TheseIn 2023 these meetings arewere chaired by K.T. Hoeg,D.W. Cornhill, the independent director designated by the independent directors to chair and lead these discussions. TenEight executive sessions were held in 2021.2023. Following the establishment of the lead director position in 2024, the executive sessions of the board are chaired by the lead director.
The company’s delegation of authority guide provides that certain matters of the company are reviewed by functional contacts within ExxonMobil. The company’s employees are regularly reminded that they are expected to act in the best interests of the company, and are reminded of their obligation to identify any instances where the company’s general interest may not be consistent with ExxonMobil’s priorities. If such situations ever occurred,occur, employees are expected to escalate such issues with successive levels of the company’s management. Final resolution of any such issues is made by the company’s chairman, president and chief executive officer.
Restrictions on insider trading

Commitment to stringent safeguards with trading restrictions and reporting for company insiders.

Structures and processes are in place to caution, track and monitor reporting insiders, nonemployee directors and key employees with access to sensitive information with respect to personal trading in the company’s shares. The company's code of ethics prohibits employees from securities transactions based on material, non-public information learned through their positions with the company. The company also has guidelines regarding corporate disclosure processes and procedures, as well as insider trading prohibitions and trading bans that are applicable to all directors, officers and employees.
Nonemployee directors are required to
pre-clear
any tradestrad
es in the company’s shares. Reporting insiders are required to give advance notice to the company of any sale of the company’s shares and advise the company within five days of any purchase of the company’s shares. Reporting insiders are required, under securities regulations, to publicallypublicly disclose all transactions in the company’s shares on the System for Electronic Disclosure by Insiders (SEDI).
From time to time, the company advises its directors and officers, and those of Exxon Mobil Corporation, and employees in certain positions, not to trade in the company’s shares. Trading bans occur in connection with the directors’ pending consideration of the financial statements of the company, including the unaudited financial statements for each quarter, and in connection with undisclosed pending events that constitute material information about the business affairs of the company.
Diversity

Diversity

The company has a long history of valuing diversity on the board and in its executive management.
Board diversity
The company has a longstanding commitment to diversity amongst its directors, anddirectors. Imperial has had at least one woman on its board continuously since 1977.
1977, and 40 percent of the board's independent directors are women.
The company does not have a formal written policy relating to the identification and nomination of directors who are women, Aboriginal peoples, persons with disabilities or members of visible minorities (the “designated groups”, as defined under the
Canada Business Corporations Regulations, 2001),
and has not adopted a target regarding members of the designated groups on its board. With the objective of fostering a diversity of expertise, viewpoint and competencies, the board charter provides that the nominations and corporate
151

governance committee may consider a number of factors, including gender and membership in aother designated group,groups, in assessing potential nominees.
The nominations and corporate governance committee assesses the work experience, other expertise, individual competencies and diversity of age, regional association and the designated groups that each existing director possesses and whether each nominee is able to fill any gaps amongst the existing directors. Additionally, the committee may consider any other factors that it believes to be relevant. The company does not believe that any one of these dimensions should be considered in isolation and without due regard to all of the other factors, in determining the ability of potential directors to contribute to the work of the board of directors.
146

TableThe board considers diversity through the annual nomination process, board assessment and other discussions. The board and the nominations and corporate governance committee also specifically consider diversity through targeted director recruitment processes. With three of Contentsthe company’s directors retiring in 2023, the board and the nominations and corporate governance committee completed an extensive director recruitment process in early 2023, with S.R. Driscoll, J.N. Floren and G.J. Goldberg being elected as directors of the company at the annual meeting in 2023. Diversity and the composition of the board was a key consideration throughout this process and the review of potential candidates, with the company instructing executive search firms to cultivate a diverse selection of potential nominees. The result of the recruitment process brought further experience and diverse perspectives to the board and maintained 40 percent of the independent directors being women.
As of the date of this proxy circular, the number and percentage of directors and nominees who are members of the designated groups are:

 
 Designated group (a)
 
Number
 
Number
Percent
(%)
 
Women
  Women
2 of 7 (board and nominees)
29
2 of 5 (independent directors)
29
40
 Aboriginal peoples
0 of 70
 Persons with disabilities
0 of 70
 Members of visible minorities
0 of 70
(a)
Defined under the Employment Equity Act (Canada)
(a)Defined under the Employment Equity Act (Canada)
The above diversity disclosure relies on voluntary self-identification by directors and nominees, and therefore only represents the information of individuals who have chosen to self-identify. The information has not been independently verified by the company. The board nominee composition charts on page 118120 show the diversity of our board nominees with respect to gender, experience and regional association, but do not reflect membership in other designated groups.
Executive officer diversity
The company believes inclusion and diversity are key competitive strengths that are critical to maintaining the company’s position as an industry leader. To ensure commitment at all levels of the company, inclusion and diversity, anti-harassment and equal employment opportunity performance is stewarded annually to the company’s senior management. There is an
in-depth
succession planning process, which includes the consideration of various aspects of diversity, as well as plans to address gaps, if any, for key positions.
The company’s internal training programs emphasize the value of collaboration, appreciating differences and sustaining an inclusive work environment, keeping inclusion and diversity
top-of-mind
with all employees. Imperial also values external perspective and expertise, and collaborates with leading diversity organizations to help shape our future inclusion and diversity plans.expertise. The company supports educational development and recruiting practices that facilitate the employment of Indigenous peoples, and in 2021 achieved Silver Certification in the Progressive Aboriginal Relations (PAR) program managed by the Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business.
Imperial maintains a supportive work environment thoughthrough a range of development and
152

networking programs, including
employee-led
diversity networks that are focused on common interests. These programs continuedare conducted in both virtual and in-person formats to reach a virtual format in 2021 as a resultbroad range of the
COVID-19employees.
pandemic.    
In considering potential nominees for executive officer appointments, the executive resources committee considers diversity of gender and the other designated groups, work experience, other expertise, individual competencies and other dimensions of diversity in addition to the other factors described on page 160.diversity. The company has not adopted a target regarding members of the designated groups in executive officer positions. The company does not believe that any one of these dimensions should be considered, without due regard to all of these other factors, in determining the ability of potential nominees to fill executive officers positions.
147

Table of Contents
As of the date of this proxy circular, the number and percentage of executive officers of the company and its major subsidiaries who are members of the designated groups are:

Designated group (a)
Number
Number
Percent
(%)
 Women10 of 2343
  Women
 Aboriginal peoples
0 of 2312 of 25480
  Aboriginal peoples
0 of 250
 Persons with disabilities
0 of 25230
 Members of visible minorities
2 of 233 of 25129
(a)Defined under the Employment Equity Act (Canada)
(a)
Defined under the Employment Equity Act (Canada)
The above diversity disclosure relies on voluntary self-identification by executive officers, and therefore only represents the information of individuals who have chosen to self-identify. The information has not been independently verified by the company.
Shareholder engagement

 
Shareholder engagement strategy focuses on wide-ranging dialogue between shareholders and management.
Understanding investor interests and concerns and obtaining their feedback is central to the company's shareholder engagement program. This critical input not only informs how the company interacts and communicates, but also helps identify what areas require additional focus to demonstrate ongoing progress and performance.
The company’s senior management regularly meet with institutional investors and shareholders through industry conferences, roadshows and company hosted investor events. In response to
COVID-19
and to ensure the health and safety of our employees, investors and shareholders,2023, these meetingsevents were largely held predominantly in a virtual format for the balance of 2021.as in-person engagements. Pertinent materials from these conferences and hosted events are available on the company’s website.
AlsoThe company also hosts regular quarterly earnings calls in responseconnection with earnings releases, and archives of these calls (including transcripts) are available on Imperial’s website for one year after each call. These calls allow the company to
COVID-19
provide more insight and to ensurecontext regarding the health and safety of its shareholders, directors, officers and stakeholders,company’s performance, as well as directly address questions from the investment community.
The company took a number of steps to ensure active engagement through the annual meeting that was held in a virtual only format. Shareholders were given the opportunity to register a proxyholder to attend and ask questions in real time, and the company encouraged engagement from shareholders prior to the event. This format also allowed shareholders, who may not otherwise have been able to attend in person, to log in as a guest and follow the meeting. The webcast is available on the company website along with speeches and presentations from the annual general meeting and the outcome of the voting on each resolution.
The company also hosts regular quarterly earnings calls in connection with earnings releases, and archives of these calls (including transcripts) are available on Imperial’s website for one year after each call. These calls allow the company to provide more insight and context regarding the company’s performance, as well as directly address questions from the investment community.
153

The company annually solicits questions and comments from shareholders through the annual meeting of shareholders. The comments received are reviewed by senior management providing them with an indication of areas of interest to our shareholders, and those requiring a response are answered individually. In addition, the company’s Investor Relations team responds to shareholder queries throughout the year, and proactively reaches out to shareholders to obtain their views on matters identified broadly by shareholders, including with respect to environment, social and governance topics, as well as optimal engagement approaches. TheIn 2023, shareholder engagement and discussion involved a broad range of topics including capital allocation strategy, corporate guidance and operational performance, company growth plans, emission reduction plans and the Oil Sands Pathways to Net Zero initiative, and corporate strategy including with respect to the energy transition. Investor Relations team is available to respond to shareholderperspectives were a factor considered in decision making, and investor queries throughoutfeedback was incorporated into company disclosure improvement efforts.

Communicating with the year.
board
Shareholders, employees and others can contact the board directly by writing to:
Chair of the Board of Directors
148c/o Corporate Secretary
Imperial Oil Limited
505 Quarry Park Blvd SE
Calgary, AB, Canada T2C 5N1


Table of Contents
Largest shareholder
 
Exxon Mobil Corporation is the majority shareholder of the company, holding 69.6% of the company’s shares.
To the knowledge of the directors and executive officers of the company, the only shareholder who, as of February 15, 2022,2024, owned beneficially, or exercised control or direction over, directly or indirectly, more than five percent of the outstanding common shares of the company, is Exxon Mobil Corporation, 5959 Las Colinas Boulevard, Irving,22777 Springwoods Village Parkway, Spring, Texas, 75039-2298,77389-1425, which owns beneficially 465,723,543372,942,029 common shares, representing approximately 69.6 percent of the outstanding voting shares of the company. As a consequence, the company is a “controlled company” for purposes of the listing standards of the NYSE American LLC and a “majority controlled company” for purposes of the TSX Company Manual.
Transactions with Exxon Mobil Corporation
The company has written procedures and controls that require any transactions between the company and ExxonMobil and its subsidiaries to be reviewed by controllers, tax, treasurers and legal to ensure that each agreement meets the company’s policies and procedures, is fair, and complies with legal and tax requirements. These agreements may also be subject to review by the chairman, president, and chief executive officer. Annual training is provided for key individuals to ensure awareness of the requirements for identifying related party transactions, and procedures are in place to ensure reporting of these transactions is complete and accurate. Related party transactions with ExxonMobil and its subsidiaries are analyzed and reviewed by management on a quarterly basis to understand any significant variances from period to period, and reviewed with the board of directors on an annual basis.

The company undertook a number of issuer bid transactions during 2023 that involved ExxonMobil. On June 29, 2020,27, 2023, the company implemented a limited
12-month
“normal “normal course” share purchase program, primarily to eliminate dilution from shares issued in conjunction with its restricted stock unit plan. On April 30, 2021, in response to improving market conditions, the company announced an amendment to the program to increase the number of common shares it could purchase. This amendment increased the program from 50,000 shares to a maximum of 29,363,070 shares, or up to four percent of the outstanding shares as of June 15, 2020. Between June 29, 2020 and June 28, 2021, the company purchased 8,931,249 common shares on the open market and a corresponding 20,431,821 common shares from ExxonMobil concurrent with, but outside of the program to maintain its shareholding at approximately 69.6 percent. On June 29, 2021, a further
12-month
normal course share purchase program was implemented, allowing the company to purchase up to five percent of its outstanding common shares as of June 15, 2021,2023, or a maximum of 35,583,67129,207,635 shares. In accordance with the company’s announcement on November 12, 2021 that it intended to accelerate purchases under theThe program the program subsequently ended on January 31, 2022October 19, 2023 upon the company purchasing the maximum allowable number of shares. As of February 15, 2022, the company purchased 10,822,142shares, with 8,879,143 common shares purchased on the open market and 24,761,529a corresponding 20,328,492 common shares purchased from ExxonMobil concurrent with, but outside of thisthe program to maintain its shareholding at approximately 69.6 percent.

On November 3, 2023, the company commenced a substantial issuer bid that offered to purchase up to $1.5 billion of its common shares through a modified Dutch auction and proportionate tender offer. The substantial issuer bid was completed on December 13, 2023, with the company purchasing 19,108,280 common shares at a price of $78.50 per share, for an aggregate purchase of $1.5 billion and 3.4 percent of the company's issued and outstanding shares (as of the close of business on October 30, 2023). This included 13,299,349 shares purchased from ExxonMobil by way of a proportionate tender to maintain its ownership percentage at approximately 69.6 percent.
154

The amounts of purchases and revenues by the company and its subsidiaries for other transactions in 20212023 with ExxonMobil and its affiliates were $2,669$4,026 million and $8,777$13,544 million, respectively. These transactions were conducted on terms as favourable as they would have been with unrelated parties, and primarily consisted of the purchase and sale of crude oil, natural gas, petroleum and chemical products, as well as technical, engineering and research and development costs. Transactions with ExxonMobil also included amounts paid and received in connection with the company’s participation in a number of upstream activities conducted jointly in Canada. In addition, the company has existing agreements with affiliates of ExxonMobil to provide information technology and customer support services to the company and to share common business and operational support services to allow the companies to consolidate duplicate work and systems. The company has a contractual agreement with an affiliate of ExxonMobil in Canada to operate certain western Canada production properties owned by ExxonMobil. There are no asset ownership changes.
The company and that affiliate also have a contractual agreement to provide for equal participation in new upstream opportunities. The company had an existing agreement with ExxonMobil to provide for the delivery of management, business and technical services to Syncrude Canada Ltd. by ExxonMobil, which was terminated in connection with the transfer of operatorship of Syncrude on September 30, 2021.
149

Table of Contents
As at December 31, 2021,2023, the company had an outstanding loan of $4,447$3,447 million under an existing agreement with an affiliated company of ExxonMobil that provides for a long term, variable rate loan from ExxonMobil to the company of up to $7.75 billion (Canadian) at market interest rates. The agreement is effective until June 30, 2025, cancellable if ExxonMobil provides at least 370 days advance written notice. Additionally, in 2021 the company repaid the outstanding balance of the short term loan of $111 million borrowed under an arrangement with ExxonMobil, and terminated the associated loan agreement. This short term loan provided for a
non-interest
bearing, revolving demand loan of up to $150 million, and represented ExxonMobil’s share of a working capital facility required to support purchasing, marketing, transportation and derivative arrangements for crude oil and diluent products undertaken by the company on behalf of ExxonMobil.
150
155

Table of Contents

Company executives and executive compensation
Named executive officers of the company
The named executive officers of the company at year end 20212023 are listed below, all of whom remain in their positions as of February 15, 2022.
2024.
Bradley W. Corson, 60
62
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Position held at the end of 2021 (date2023 (date office held):
Chairman, president and chief executive officer
(2020 – Present)
 
Other positions in the past five years (position,(position, date office held and status of employer):
President
(2019 – Present)2020)
 
President, ExxonMobil Upstream Ventures
(2015 – 2019) (Affiliate)(affiliate)
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Corson (cropped).jpg
Daniel E. Lyons, 59
61
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Position held at the end of 2021 (date2023 (date office held):
Senior vice-president, finance and administration, and controller
(2018 – Present)
 
Other positions in the past five years (position,(position, date office held and status of employer):
No other positions in the last five years
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Vice-president, downstream business services and downstream treasurer, Exxon Mobil Corporation
(2015 – 2018) (Affiliate)
EO - Dan Lyons .jpg
Simon P. Younger, 46
48
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Position held at the end of 2021 (date2023 (date office held):
Senior vice-president, upstream
(2020 – Present)
 
Other positions in the past five years (position,(position, date office held and status of employer):
Vice-president, production, upstream
(2019 – 2020)

Senior planning advisor, corporate strategic planning, upstream, Exxon Mobil Corporation
(2017 – 2019) (Affiliate)(affiliate)
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Vice-president, production and joint interest manager, ExxonMobil Qatar Limited
(2015 – 2017) (Affiliate)
EO - Younger.jpg
Bruce A. Jolly, 54
56
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Position held at the end of 2021 (date2023 (date office held):
Assistant controller
Treasurer
(20192023 – Present)
 
Other positions in the past five years (position,(position, date office held and status of employer):
Assistant controller
(2019 – 2023)

Upstream controller
(2018 – 2019)
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Controller, United States upstream production, Exxon Mobil Corporation
(2016 – 2018) (Affiliate)
EO - Bruce Jolly.jpg
Jonathan R. Wetmore, 49
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Sherri L. Evers, 47
Position held (dateat the end of 2023 (date office held):
Vice-president, downstreamSenior vice-president, sustainability, commercial development and Western Canada fuels manager
product solutions
(20182023 – Present)
 
Other positions in the past five years (position,(position, date office held and status of employer):
Manager, supplyVice-president, commercial and manufacturing
corporate development
(2021 – 2023)

Fuels manager, Central and Eastern Canada, fuels and lubricants
(June 20172018December 2017)2020)
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Refinery manager, Fawley UK, UK Esso Petroleum Company Ltd
(2013 – 2017) (Affiliate)
EO - Sherri Evers .jpg
151
156

Table of Contents
Other executive officers of the company
In addition to the named executive officers listed on the previous page, the following individuals are executive officers of the company as of February 15, 2022.
2024.
Kristi L. Desjardins, 50

Sherri L. Evers, 45
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Position held (date(date office held):
Vice-president, commercial and corporate development
human resources
(20212020 – Present)
 
Other positions in the past five years (position,(position, date office held and status of employer):
Fuels manager, Central and Eastern Canada, fuels and lubricants
(2018 – 2020)
Product exchange and analysis manager, refining and supply, Exxon Mobil Corporation
(2016 – 2018) (Affiliate)
Kitty Lee, 45
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Position held (date office held):
Treasurer
(2020 – Present)
Other positions in the past five years (position, date office held and status of employer):
Financial advisor, treasurer’s, Exxon Mobil Corporation
(2019 – 2020) (Affiliate)
Benefits finance manager, treasurer’s, Exxon Mobil Corporation
(2018 – 2019) (Affiliate)
Global coordination manager, controller’s, Exxon Mobil Corporation
(2016 – 2018) (Affiliate)
Kristi L. Desjardins, 48
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Position held (date office held):
Vice-president, human resources
(2020 – Present)
Other positions in the past five years (position, date office held and status of employer):
Human resources services manager, global human resources operations, Exxon Mobil Corporation
(2018 – 2020) (Affiliate)
Manager, human resources services
(2017 – 2018)
Manager, human resources services, operations
(2014 – 2017)
(affiliate)
EO - Desjardins (background).jpg
Constance D. Gemmell, 55
57
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Position held (date(date office held):
Director, corporate tax
(2018 – Present)
 
Other positions in the past five years (position,(position, date office held and status of employer):
Manager, income tax planning and adviceNo other positions in the past five years
(2013 – 2018)
152

Table of Contents
Kimberly J. Haas, 48EO - Constance Gemmel.jpg
Sarnia, Ontario, Canada
Ian R. Laing, 50
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Position held (date(date office held):
Vice-president, chemicalsgeneral counsel and Sarnia chemical plant managercorporate secretary
(2020 – Present)
 
Other positions in the past five years (position,(position, date office held and status of employer):
Project executive, chemicals, global operations, Exxon Mobil Chemical Company
(2020) (Affiliate)
Process manager, Baytown olefins plant, Exxon Mobil Chemical Company,
(2016 – 2020) (Affiliate)
Ian R. Laing, 48
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Position held (date office held):
Vice-president, general counsel and corporate secretary
(2020 – Present)
Other positions in the past five years (position, date office held and status of employer):
Assistant general counsel, downstream and corporate departments and corporate secretary
(2019 – 2020)
 

EO - Ian Laing.jpg
Christopher Leyerzapf, 48
Position held (date office held):
Assistant general counsel,controller
(2023 – Present)
Other positions in the past five years (position, date office held and status of employer):
Upstream controller
(2021 – 2023)

Upstream business analysis and reporting manager
(2019 – 2021)

Senior financial advisor, upstream
corporate reporting, Exxon Mobil Corporation
(2018 – 2019) (affiliate)

Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Chris Leyerzapf 255[1].jpg
Eloissa D. Wells, 43
Position held (date office held):
Vice-president, chemicals and Sarnia site complex manager
(201720232018)Present)
Other positions in the past five years (position, date office held and status of employer):
US and Canada commercial fuel sales and marketing manager, product solutions, fuels value chain, Exxon Mobil Corporation (2021 – 2023) (affiliate)

Business analysis and reporting manager, controllers, Exxon Mobil Corporation
(2019 – 2021) (affiliate)

Baton Rouge fuels refinery process department head, Baton Rouge refinery, Exxon Mobil Corporation (2017 – 2019) (affiliate)

Sarnia, Ontario, Canada
EO - Wells (background).jpg
153
157

Table of Contents
Executive Compensation
Compensation discussion and analysis
Compensation design
Approach to executive compensation
Strong governance practices
Overview
Accountability and performance
Long-term award program
Bonus program
Salary program
Determining compensation
Annual benchmarking
2023 business performance
Performance graph
2023 compensation actions
Other compensation elements
Retirement plans
Award vesting and share utilization
Granting practices
Amendments
Risk and governance
Executive stock ownership
Forfeiture provisions
Clawback policies
Anti-hedging policy
Severance agreements
Change-in-control
Definitions and frequently used terms
Executive compensation tables
Summary compensation table
Outstanding equity awards
Incentive plan awards – Value vested or earned
Equity compensation plan information
RSUs as a percentage of outstanding shares
Annual burn rate
Status of prior long-term incentive plans
Pension plan benefits
Other compensation elements
The compensation and discussion analysis and executive compensation tables outline Imperial's executive compensation program and process for determining pay as it applies to the named executive officers (NEOs).

For 2023, named executive officers were:
Corson (cropped).jpg
Brad W. Corson
Chairman, president, and chief executive officer
Dan Lyons (crop).jpg
Daniel E. Lyons
Senior vice-president, finance and administration, and controller
EO - Younger.jpg
Simon P. Younger
Senior vice-president, upstream
Bruce Jolly (crop).jpg
Bruce A. Jolly
Treasurer
Sherri Evers (crop).jpg
Sherri L. Evers
Senior vice-president, sustainability, commercial development, and product solutions

Executive summary
Letter to shareholders from the executive resources committee on executive compensation
Dear fellowFellow shareholders:
The executive resources committee (“committee”) would like to outline for yousupports the roledesign and resulting pay outcomes of Imperial's executive compensation program; we believe that it aligns well with the company’s business model and considers the complexity of the committeebusiness environment in ensuring good governance inwhich the managementcompany operates. Executive performance is evaluated across multiple performance dimensions within the context of the company’s long-term strategy. The design of the executive compensation withinprogram rewards performance and ensures the company.
goal of maximizing long-term shareholder value is achieved and the company is positioned for long-term success.
Business Perspective
Imperial's business involves investments that create shareholder value over long periods of time, requiring executives to maintain a long-term view when making decisions. The committeeexecutive compensation program design reflects this and has proven to be adaptable to evolving strategic priorities.

In 2023, Imperial delivered strong business results across a wide range of performance dimensions. Through its focus on strategic priorities and commitment to delivering reliable, affordable, and lower emission energy to Canadians, the company is responsiblepositioned for corporate policylong-term success, and able to drive long-term shareholder value. The company's disciplined approach and focus on compensationcost efficiencies allows it to realize the full benefit of market conditions and for specific decisionsdeliver strong financial performance. For more information on the compensation of the chief executive officer,2023 key senior executives, and officers of the company. In exercising this responsibility, the committee views long-term orientation and the management of risk as integral elements of the compensation policies and practices of the company. These policies and practices are designed to keep management, including named executive officers, focused on the strategic objectives of the company over the long-term and to effectively assess and mitigate risk in the execution of these objectives. business results see page 168.
Compensation Decisions
The committee exercises oversight of a compensation program that supportsaligns executives' pay with the company’s objectiveresults of their decisions and the returns of our shareholders over the long term. The program design is aligned with the core elements of the majority shareholder's compensation program, and is designed to attract, develop,drive long-term accountability, reward the highest standard of performance, and retain key talent needed to achieve its strategic objectives.promote retention.
The compensation discussion and analysis (“("CD&A”&A") section that follows describes the compensation program for the company’scompany's named executive officers and how the program supports the business goals of the company.
Key decisions approved by the committee are as follows:
The company’s compensationcommittee approved competitive base salaries for named executive officers, consistent with the salary program is designed to:
for all executives.
·
align the interests of its executives with long-term shareholder interests;
·
encourage executives to manage risk and take a long-term view when making investments and managing the assets of the business;
·
reinforce the company’s philosophy that the experience, skill, and motivation of the company’s executives are significant determinants of future business success; and
·
promote career orientation and strong individual performance.
The 2023 bonus program awards were approved at lower levels than 2022, reflective of changes in year-on-year earnings performance and further differentiated by individual performance.
The compensationcommittee granted restricted stock unit awards in keeping with program design, is aligned with the core elementsvalue of the majority shareholder’s compensation program, including linkage to near term aspects of incentive pay, long vesting periods, risk of forfeiture, and alignmentawards having increased year-on-year in line with the shareholder experience.
increases in stock price.
We execute our oversight responsibilities in this regard by ensuring the company’s program is built on sound principles of compensation design, including an annual assessment of comparator companies to evaluate market competitiveness, appropriate risk assessment, and risk management practices, sound governance principles, and support of the company’s business model. In exercising our oversight and decision making roles, the committee balances many factors each year in terms of impact on compensation decisions relative to the company’s performance.
The committee considers both business resultshas reviewed and individual performance in its decisions. The business environment in 2020 presenteddiscussed the CD&A with management of the company and the broader industry with extreme challenges and these challenges continued to some extent into 2021. The
COVID-19
pandemic has continued to have an impact on our organization and employees, presenting unique management and operational challenges for the company. In this difficult environment, Imperial remained focused on delivering long-term shareholder value and positioning the company for the ongoing recovery in demand and prices. Demand for petroleum and petrochemical products has continued to recover, with the company’s financial results benefiting from stronger commodity prices and structurally lower operating and capital expenditures. For more information on the 2021 key business results see page 168.
154

Table of Contents
The key business results had an impact on 2021 compensation decisions for the named executive officers.
2021 Compensation program highlights
Base salary
·
   2021 salaries were held at 2020 levels, reflective of market conditions at the time of decision
For 2022, the executive resources committee granted salary increases to named executive officers consistent with the salary program for executives. Individual salary increases take into account individual performance, level of responsibility, and experience; and reflects market analysis and competitiveness at time of decision in 2021
Annual bonus
·
   2021 bonus award was paid in full in year of grant rather than a combination of cash and earnings bonus units, consistent with market practice and resulting in a stronger link to earnings performance and individual performance differentiation.
Restricted stock units
·
   The executive resources committee granted awards consistent with program design; no
make-up
grants were awarded to address lower value of 2020 award grants
·
   The value of long-term awards increased year-over-year, reflecting stock price recovery; changes in award grants for named executive officers reflect individual performance and/or change in pay grade
The individual committee members, through their experience in stewarding compensation programs and their participation on board committees, are able to understand the company’s overall objectives, operating risks, and financial risks. This understanding of the company’s objectives and range of business risks allows an appropriate calibration of the company’s compensation policies and practices to the business model.
The committee continues to support the design of the executive compensation program in that it achieves the goal of maximizing long-term shareholder value while positioning the company for long-term success in a lower-emissions future. The committee has recommended to the board that the CD&A be included in the company’s management proxy circular for the 20222024 annual meeting of shareholders. Weshareholders and annual report of Form 10-K. On behalf of the committee, I encourage you to read the comprehensive disclosure in the CD&A that follows. The committee is committed to overseeing all aspects of the executive compensation program in the best interests of the company and all shareholders.
Submitted on behalf of the executive resources committee,

WI00143_ExecutiveOfficerBGReplaceSmall_GaryGoldberg (resized).jpg
G.J. Goldberg,
Chair, executive resources committee
Original signed by
D.S. Sutherland,
Chair, executive resources committee
D.W. Cornhill, Vice-chair
M.R. Crocker
K.T. Hoeg
M.C. Hubbs
J.M. Mintz
155
159

Table
Compensation design
Approach to executive compensation
The decisions that our executives make and the risks they manage play out over multi-year time horizons. Executives are required to carefully consider current and future risks, such as those related to the energy transition, and to make decisions across a broad range of Contents

Table of Contents
Overview
The company takes a long-term view to managing its business.
Our objective is to meet society’s needs with the productsbusiness environments that are essential for modern life while playing a key role in addressing the challenges of climate change. The company takes a long-term view in managing its business rather than reacting to short-term business cycles. The company’s strategies provide the framework to deliver on its commitments, creategenerate sustainable shareholder value throughoutover the commodity price cycle, and address the dual challenge of meeting growing energy demand while reducing environmental impacts. As such, thelong term.

The company's executive compensation program design aligns executives' pay with the results of their decisions and shareholder returns over the long term. The program is designed to drive long-term sustainabilityaccountability, reward the highest standard of performance, and promote retention.

Drive long-term accountability
The company's strategic objectives have been established to drive sustainable value while positioning the company for long-term success in a lower-emissions future. These objectives are translated into annual plan goals through a comprehensive process which incorporates corporate and functional plans. Goals are incorporated in the corporate plan, which is reviewed and approved by the board and provides the framework for the company's commitments.

Reward outstanding performance
Highly differentiated pay-for-performance is foundational to the company's compensation program design. The extent to which executives achieve pre-established goals, assessed over near- and long-term horizons, is a key differentiating factor in executives' pay deliberations. Performance evaluation directly impacts level of base salary, bonus, and long-term incentive awards.
Promote retention
Long-term orientation also underpins how the company develops talent. It begins with recruiting exceptional people, and continues with individually planned experiences and training, which leads to broad development and a deep understanding of our business across the business cycle.
The compensation program is designed to attract and supports key business strategies as outlined below:retain talent for a career through compensation that is market competitive, highly differentiated by individual performance, and with long restriction periods that promote retention.
Supported by strong governance practices
Key design features that discourage executives from taking inappropriate risk include:

✓ Extensive stock ownership✗ No severance agreements
✓ Significant pay at risk✗ No change-in-control arrangements
✓ Strong forfeiture provisions✗ No guaranteed bonuses
✓ Clawback policy✗ No additional stock grants to balance losses in value
✓ Anti-hedging policy✗ No accelerated vesting at retirement
✓ Annual assessment of compensation design












Canadian business environment
·
Large, accessible upstream resources;
·
Mature, competitive downstream markets;
·
Evolving environmental, fiscal, and energy policies impacting global competitiveness; and
·
Market access limitations and uncertainties.
Business model
·
Long-life, competitively advantaged assets;
·
Disciplined investment and cost management;
·
Value-chain integration and synergies;
·
High-impact technologies and innovation; and
·
Operational excellence and responsible growth.
Key business strategies
·
Deliver industry-leading performance in safety, emissions reductions, environmental performance and reliability;
·
Grow profitable production and sales volumes;
·
Disciplined and long-term focus on improving the productivity of the company’s asset mix; and
·
Best-in-class
cost structure to support industry-leading returns on capital and superior cash flow.
These key business strategies are the primary focus and support long-term growth in shareholder value.
157
160

Key elements of the compensation program
The key elements of the company’s compensation program that align with the business model and support key business strategies are:
Overview
Element
Base salary
Annual bonus
Restricted stock units
Accountability and performance | Pages 162 - 163
Board reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives annually; integrated into company's plan cycle.
Goals are cascaded at each level, tailored for area of responsibility; annual assessment versus planned goals results in differentiated pay outcomes.
Compensation design | Pages 164 - 166
PercentNamed executive officers participate in the same broad-based programs as all other executives.
Restricted stock units for senior executives represent a higher percentage of total direct compensation1, reflective of the impact of their decisions, and resulting in increased pay-at-risk.
Restricted stock unitsAnnual bonusBase salary
Percent of NEO total direct compensation (a)
1
Over 50 percent
·
   Approximately 30 percent
·
   Approximately 10 to 20 percent
·
   Approximately 5010 to 30 percent or more
Intent
Link pay to returns of long-term shareholders
  Intent
Encourage long-term view through the commodity price cycle
·
   Provide competitive base pay
·
Link pay to annual company earnings performance
·
   Provide near-term performance paymentAlign incentives across all functions
·
   LinkProvide competitive base pay to returns of long-term shareholders
·
   Encourages long-term view through commodity price cycle
Key design features
Design Features
·
   Increase determined by individual performance, level of responsibility, experience, and pay grade
·
   Ties directly to long-term benefits (pension & savings plans)
·
   Paid in year of grant
·
   Bonus award pool shifts in line with year-over-year earnings
·
   Individual award determined by performance and pay grade
·
   Full award subject to clawback
·
Granted in the form of stock units
·
CEO: 50 percent vests in 5 years from grant date; 50 percent in 10 years
·
All other executives and employees:executives: 50 percent vests in 3 years from grant date; 50 percent in 7 years
·
Long restriction periods coupled with performance metrics applied at grant
·
Significant portion of pay at risk of forfeiture for extended period of time
Paid in year of grant
Bonus award pool reflective of business performance
Individual award further determined by individual performance and pay grade
Full award subject to clawback
Increase determined by individual performance, experience, and pay grade
Ties directly to long-term benefits
Determining compensation
Annual compensation benchmarking | Page 167
  Pay at risk
·
   FixedTarget pay
·
   Variable pay at risk
·
   Variable pay at risk around the median, considering tenure in position, individual and business performance
Business performance | Page 168
Performance DimensionMeasurement
Progress toward strategic objectives
(a)  Total direct compensation includes salary, the annual bonus,Operations performance
Financial performance
Energy transition
Business portfolio
Demonstrated leadership and the grant date fair valueaccomplishments relative to established goals and objectives
Pay deliberations and decisions | Pages 170 - 171
Balances progress toward strategic objectives, business results, individual performance, and competitiveness of the restricted stock unit award which is equal to the price of the company’s common shares on the date of grant.
pay, taking into account experience in position




1 Refer to definitions and frequently used terms on page 175
161
The above programs are underpinned by our pension and savings plans which provides for financial security after employment.
Management of risk
The company is governed by a comprehensiveAccountability and well-established risk management system, and the company’s success in managing risk over time has been achieved through emphasis on execution of this disciplined management framework. The company operates in an industry in which effective risk management is critical. The company’s risk management framework includes a process for identifying, prioritizing, measuring, and managing the principal risks across the company, as well as assessing the company’s response to these risks. This framework establishes common expectations for addressing risks inherent in our business and takes priority over other business and financial objectives. For further discussion on the company’s risk management system and oversight, see “Risk oversight” within the “Statement of corporate governance practice” on page 129.
The company’s long-term orientation andperformance
Executive compensation program design encourageis aligned with business model and talent development approach - long-term oriented, performance differentiated, and adaptable to evolving strategic priorities through goal setting.
Strategic objectives
The company's long-term strategic objectives center around four key interdependent performance dimensions, reflective of the highest performance standardscompany's priority focus areas. These objectives, fully integrated into the company's plan cycle, provide the framework for the organization to deliver on its commitments.

Strategic objectives have been established to drive sustainable growth in shareholder value while positioning the company for long-term success in a lower-emissions future.
Long-term strategic objectives
Operations performanceDeliver industry-leading performance in safety, environmental performance, and reliability
Financial performanceDeliver industry-leading earnings and cash flow growth
Energy transitionReduce GHG emissions intensity at our operated assets and in hard-to-decarbonize sectors
Business portfolioOptimize existing business portfolio, resilient to a transitioning energy system
Plan goals
The company's strategic objectives are translated into annual plan goals through a comprehensive process that incorporates corporate and discourage inappropriate risk taking. The compensation program components described belowfunctional plans. Plan goals are designedendorsed by the board.
A disciplined approach to incent effective management of all operating and financial risks associated withestablishing goals aligns executives to deliver on the company’s business, including risks related to climate change, in order to:
company's strategic objectives.

·
Picture - Plan Goals.jpg
protectThe chief executive officer ("CEO") is primarily responsible for executing the safetycompany's long-term strategic objectives, as translated into annual plan goals. CEO goals and securityobjectives are supplemented with enterprise-wide initiatives. These include risk management, corporate reputation, talent management, research and technology, and management of our employees,major projects.

Plan goals and objectives are cascaded throughout the communities,organization, tailored to each executive's area of responsibility.

Goals and objectives are reviewed with senior management annually and reinforced through periodic stewardship reviews and the environment in which we operate;performance assessment process.

Leaders are held accountable to deliver on plan goals and objectives across all performance dimensions within the context of the company's strategic objectives. This sets a high performance threshold. Where faced with trade-offs across different priorities, these are discussed with senior management.
·
manage risk and operate
Design adaptable to evolving strategic priorities through integration in the business with effective business controls;company's plan process, corporate goals & objectives approved by the board

·
create sustainable value for company shareholders by increasing shareholder return, net income, and return on average capital employed*; and
·
advance the long-term strategic direction of the company.

Due to
162

Performance evaluation
The executive resources committee evaluates accomplishments across all business performance dimensions within the long vesting periodscontext of restricted stock unitsthe company's long-term strategy. Financial and the linkage of compensation to overall company performance, including all aspects of risk management, executive compensation is designed tooperating metrics further support the sustainability of ourcommittee's assessment.

Relevant business performance measures include:
Safety, health, and environmental performance;
Risk management;
Total shareholder return;
Net income;
Return on average capital employed1;
Cash flow from operations and managementasset sales1;
Operating performance of risk.
the upstream, downstream, and chemical businesses; and
*Progress on advancing long-term strategic interests.

1non-GAAP financial measure – see
Frequently definitions and frequently used terms
section on page 171 for definition and reconciliation.175.
158

TableResults of Contents
Compensation components
To manage risk, a substantial portionthe annual performance evaluation inform level of total compensation (excluding compensatory pension value) to senior executives is in the form of an annualpay, including salary, bonus, and restricted stock units. In the judgment of the committee, the mix of near-term and long-term incentives strikes an appropriate balance aligning the interests of senior executives with business priorities and the long-term sustainable growth of the company to create value for shareholder. Ongoing reviews of our compensation program, including incentives, ensure continued relevance of this mix and applicability for the company.
The table below outlines the risk management elements of our compensation programs:
Compensation
components
Risk management
Common programs
·
   All executives employed by the company, including the named executive officers, participate in common programs (the same salary, incentive, and retirement programs). Similar compensation design features and allocation of awards within the programs discourage inappropriate risk taking. The compensation of executives is differentiated based on individual performance assessment, level of responsibility, and individual experience.
·
   All executives on assignment from an affiliate of the company, including the named executive officers on assignment from Exxon Mobil Corporation and Esso Australia Pty Ltd., also participate in common programs that are administered by Exxon Mobil Corporation or such affiliates. The named executive officers on assignment receive the company’s restricted stock units.
·
   The executive resources committee reviews and approves compensation recommendations for each named executive officer prior to implementation.
Annual bonus
·
   Recoupment (“claw-back”) and forfeiture – The entire annual bonus is subject to claw-back and any delayed portion of the annual bonus is subject to forfeiture in the event of material negative restatement of the company’s reported financial or operating results. This reinforces the importance of the company’s financial controls and compliance programs. Claw-back and forfeiture provisions also apply if an executive resigns or engages in detrimental activity.
Restricted stock units
·
   Long holding periods – To further reinforce the importance of risk management and a long-term investment orientation, senior executives are required to hold a substantial portion of their equity incentive award for periods that far exceed the typical holding periods of comparator stock programs. The lengthy holding periods are tailored to the company’s business model.
·
   Risk of forfeiture – During these long holding periods, the restricted stock units are at risk of forfeiture for resignation or detrimental activity. The long vesting periods on restricted stock units and the risk of forfeiture together support an appropriate risk/reward profile that reinforces the long-term orientation expected of senior executives.
Pension
·
   The company’s defined benefit pension plan and supplemental pension arrangements are highly dependent on executives remaining with the company for a career and performing at the highest levels until retirement. This dimension of total compensation encourages executives to take a long-term view when making business decisions and to focus on achieving sustainable growth for shareholders.
unit award. For more details abouton pay deliberations for the aforementioned compensation components,CEO and other named executive officers, see pages 170 to 171.
Chief executive officer
The committee evaluates the “Compensation program” section.
CEO's performance based on progress against plan goals and objectives, which are reflective of the company's strategic objectives and supported by financial and operating metrics.
Other supporting compensation and staffing practices
·
A long established programThe company's strategic objectives are interdependent, with long-term success determined by delivery in each of management developmentthe strategic objectives. As such, the committee assigns equal weight to each of the four strategic objectives.

Recognizing the complexity and succession planning issignificant uncertainty inherent in place to reinforce a career orientationtransitioning energy system, the committee maintains its focus on balancing the energy transition objectives and ensure continuity of leadership;
meeting society's need for affordable products that support modern life.
·
The use of perquisites at the company is very limited, and mainly composed of financial planning for senior executives and the selective use of club memberships which are largely tied to building business relationships; and
·
Tax assistance is provided for employees on expatriate assignment. This assistance consists primarily of a tax equalization component designed to maintain the employees’ overall income tax burden at approximately the same level it would have otherwise been, had they remained in their home country. The expatriate relocation program is broad-based and applies to all executive, management, professional and technical transferred employees.
159

Table of Contents
Hedging policy
Company policy prohibits all employees, including executives, and directors, from being a party to derivative or similar financial instruments, including puts, calls, or other options, future or forward contracts, or equity swaps or collars, with respect to the company or Exxon Mobil Corporation stock.
Business performance and basis for compensation
The assessment of employee performanceProgress is conducted through the company’s annual performance assessment program. The process assesses performance against relevant business performance measures and objectives, including the means by which performance is achieved. These business performance measures may include:
·
safety, health, and environmental performance;
·
risk management;
·
total shareholder return;
·
net income;
·
return on average capital employed*;
·
cash flow from operations and asset sales*;
·
operating performance of the upstream, downstream, and chemical segments; and
·
progress on advancing government relations and long-term strategic interests.
*non-GAAP
financial measure – see
Frequently used terms
section on page 171 for definition and reconciliation.
The performance assessment program includes a comparative assessment of employee performance using a standard approachdiscussed throughout the organizationyear in various board and at all levels. It is integrated with the compensation program, which results in significant pay differentiation between highercommittee reviews. Financial and lower performers. The performance assessment program is also integrated with the executive development process. Both have been in place for many yearsoperating metrics are assessed over near- and are the basis for planning individual development and succession for management positions. Decision-making with respect to compensation requires judgment,long-term time horizons, taking into account the broader business environment. See page 168 for 2023 business performance.
Executive officers
The CEO reviews the performance of all other executive officers with the board during the annual executive development review. Performance is evaluated based on accomplishments versus plan goals and individualobjectives.
In addition to this formal annual assessment, the board evaluates the performance of all senior executives throughout the year during specific reviews and responsibility. Quantitativeboard meetings.
The committee also takes into account demonstrated leadership in sustaining sound business controls and a strong ethical and corporate governance environment.
The committee does not use quantitative targets or formulae are not used to assess individual performance or determine compensation. Formula-based performance assessments and compensation typically require emphasis on two or three business metrics. For the amountcompany to be an industry leader and effectively manage the technical complexity and integrated scope of compensation.its operations, senior executives must advance multiple strategies and objectives in parallel, versus emphasizing one or two at the expense of others that require equal attention.
Disciplined approach holds executives accountable for business results and progressing strategic objectives, balancing short- and long-term activities

Succession planning
163

The succession planning process fosters
Long-term award program
Through long restriction periods, Imperial executives are incentivized to take a long-term view in decision making
Restricted stock units represent over 50 percent of total direct compensation1, and are intended to link executive pay to the company’s approachreturns of long-term shareholders and encourage a long-term view through the commodity price cycle.

Restricted stock units granted to the CEO vest 50 percent in 5 years and 50 percent in 10 years. Restricted stock units granted to all other executives vest 50 percent in 3 years and 50 percent in 7 years.

Program design
Business model alignment
Long investment lead times and complex risk management
landscape require long-term view

Shareholder alignment
Majority of executive pay delivered in restricted stock units, aligning realized pay level with returns of long-term shareholders
Accountability
Restriction periods and risk of forfeiture drive focus on long-term shareholder value creation while managing risk

Longest restriction periods in any industry
Applying performance measures at grant enables restriction periods of up to 10 years
Highest standards of performance
Performance assessed against
pre-established goals and objectives, results tie directly to award level
Ability to retain key talent
Executives unable to monetize significant portion of pay, creating large “buyout" hurdle
Long restriction periods in line with investment lead times and risk profile
Investment decisions in a career orientationcapital-intensive industry and promotionmanagement of risk play out over time horizons often decades in length, through volatile commodity price cycles, requiring executives to maintain a long-term view when making decisions.
Long restriction periods ensure that a significant portion of pay reflects the outcome of these decisions and the experience of long-term shareholders.
An alternate formula-based program would require a shorter time horizon to set meaningful, credible targets. A shorter-term program could encourage short-term decision making, which is not aligned with the long investment lead times and capital-intensive nature of the business.
Example below shows net cash flow of a typical Imperial project aligning with the restricted stock program design for the Imperial CEO. It illustrates that short-term vesting occurs prior to determination of project financial success or failure and that longer-term vesting better aligns with shareholder returns resulting from within. This approach strengthens continuity of leadershipinvestment decisions.
Picture - Long restriction periods.jpg


1 Refer to definitions and supports ongoing alignmentfrequently used terms on page 175
164

Share-denominated basis aligns award values with our long-term business model. This process helpsshareholder outcomes
Uniquely long restriction periods result in a need to assess the competenceapply performance metrics at grant, versus at vest.
Restricted stock award grant levels are established based on pay grade and readiness of individuals for senior executive positions. individual performance.
The executive resources committee does not adjust share grants to offset changes in share price, which results in executives seeing a one-for-one change in compensation through share price.
A share-denominated approach1 coupled with long restriction periods defines the risk/reward profile of stock-based performance awards and results in a greater degree of volatility versus alternate programs with a dollar-denominated approach.1
2023 decisions
As in prior years, and as a matter of principle, the committee did not adjust share grants to offset changes in the current share price, thus maintaining strong alignment in the experience of our executives and our long-term shareholders.
Changes in award grants for named executive officers reflect individual performance.
Long-term award value increased reflective of stock price, $77.12 at 2023 grant versus $72.62 in 2022, up from $44.08 in 2021, and $24.26 in 2020.
Stock ownership1
It is responsible for approving specific succession plans for the position of chairman, president and chief executive officer, and key senior executive positions, including all officers of the company.
Imperial's policy that executives maintain significant stock ownership, with no accelerated vesting at retirement
The executive resources committee regularly reviews the company’s succession plans for key senior executive positions. It considers candidates for these positions from within the company and certain candidates from Exxon Mobil Corporation and its affiliates. This is an
in-depth
review of succession plans, which includes the consideration of various aspects of diversity as well as plans to address gaps, if any, for key executives. The company has a long-standing practice to regularly review with senior management the progress of women, Indigenous people, persons with disabilities, and visible minorities, including topics such as recruitment, attrition, training and development. For more information regarding executive officer diversity see page 146.
The chairman, president and chief executive officer also discussesmust, within three years of his appointment, acquire shares of the strengths, progress,company, including common shares and development needsrestricted stock units, of key succession candidates regularly.a value no less than five times his base salary
Long restriction periods result in stock ownership far exceeding ownership guidelines typical among other companies across industries. This providesaligns the board an opportunity to confirm a pipelineinterests of key and diverse talent exists to enable achievementour executives with those of long-term strategic objectives. shareholders and ensures focus on actions that create sustainable shareholder value over the long term
At retirement, outstanding shares will continue to vest over a 7 to 10 year period

Exxon Mobil Corporation has a plan similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan, under which grantees may receive restricted stock units, referred to herein as Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock. B.W. Corson holds Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock granted in 2018 and previous years, as well as Imperial Oil restricted stock units granted since 2019. D.E. Lyons holds Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock granted in 2017 and previous years, as well as Imperial Oil restricted stock units granted since 2018. S. P. Younger holds Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock granted in 2019 and previous years, as well as Imperial Oil restricted stock units granted since 2020.

























1 Refer to definitions and frequently used terms on page 175
165

Bonus program
Annual bonus program represents 10 to 20 percent of total direct compensation1, and is intended to link executive pay to annual company earnings performance.

Program design
The executive resources committee makes recommendations to("committee") establishes the board of directors for selection of all officersoverall size of the company, as well as other key senior executive positions reporting tobonus program. In establishing the annual bonus program, the committee:
Considers input from the chairman, president and chief executive officer.
160

Tableofficer on performance of Contents
Compensation program
The company’s compensation program is designed to reward performance,
promote retention, and encourage long-term business decisions.
Career orientation
The company’s objective is to attract, develop,the company and retain over a career the best talent available. It takes a long period of time and significant investment to develop the experienced executive talent necessary to succeed infrom the company’s business. Senior executives must have experience with all phasesinternal compensation advisors regarding compensation trends as obtained from external consultants;
Considers the linkage to the majority shareholder’s bonus program given the company’s working interest is included in Exxon Mobil Corporation earnings;
Considers annual net income of the business cyclecompany; and
Uses judgment to be effective leaders. The company’s compensation program elements are designed to encourage a career orientation among employees at all levelsmanage the overall size of the company. Careerannual bonus program taking into consideration the cyclical nature and long-term orientation among a dedicatedof the business.
A bonus award matrix is used to determine individual grant levels based on pay grade and highly skilled workforce, combinedindividual performance.
Tie to year-over-year change in earnings coupled with individual performance defines the highest performance standards, contributes to the company’s leadership in the industry and serves the interests of shareholders in the long term. The average servicerisk/reward profile of the bonus program and results in greater degree of volatility versus market practice, aligned with our approach to executive compensation as discussed on page 160.
Bonus delivered in cash in year of grant.
Full bonus award subject to clawback, see page 173.
2023 decisions
2023 bonus program awards were approved at lower levels than 2022, reflective of year-over-year changes in earnings performance; individual awards for named executive officers is 31 years which reflects this
on-going
career orientation strategy.further reflect individual performance.
The compensation program emphasizes individual experience and performance; executives holding similar positions may receive substantially different levels of compensation. Consistent with the company’s long-term career orientation, high-performing executives typically earn substantially higher levels of compensationCEO bonus $1.7 million, down from $2.2 million in the later years of their careers. This pay practice reinforces the importance of a long-term focus on making decisions that are key to business success.
2022.
The company’s executive compensation program is composed of base salaries, as well as near-term cash bonus and long-term incentive compensation. The company does not have written employment contracts or any other agreement with its named executive officers providing for payments on change of control or termination of employment.
Base salary
Salary program
Base salary represents
approximately10 to 30
percent
of total direct compensation1, and is intended to provide competitive base pay. It alsopay and directly affectsaffect the level of retirement benefits, as salary is included in the retirement benefits calculation.benefit formulas.
The overall size of the company’s overall salary program is determined by annual benchmarking. Individual salary increases are the result of individual performance, level of responsibility, experience, and changes to pay grade,grade.
2023 decisions
For 2023, the committee approved competitive base salaries for named executive officers consistent with the salary program for all executives.
Individual salary treatments take into account individual performance, level of responsibility and reflectsexperience, and reflect market analysis and competitiveness at the time of the decision.decision in2023.












1 Refer to definitions and frequently used terms on page 175
2021 decisions166

Determining Compensation
Annual benchmarking

·
2021 salaries were held at 2020 levels, reflective of market conditions at the time of decision.
·
For 2022, theThe executive resources committee granted salary increasesconducts annual benchmarking to namedassess market competitiveness of executive officers consistent with the salarypay and program for executives.
design
Compensation benchmarking
161

Annual bonus
The company’s annual bonus program represents
10 to 20
 percent
of total direct compensation,business and is intended to link executive pay to annual company earnings performance. The bonus program is established annually byindividual performance, the executive resources committee ("committee") benchmarks against a select group of major Canadian companies1.

Criteria for selecting benchmark companies1 include:
Canadian companies or Canadian affiliates;
Large operating scope and complexity;
Capital intensive; and
Proven sustainability over time.

Pay orientation
In assessing the appropriateness of pay levels, the committee considers scale and complexity, and tenure in position as relevant factors.
The committee focuses on a broad range around the median of compensation benchmark companies. This provides the ability to:
Differentiate compensation based on earnings,experience and can be highly variable depending on these results.performance levels among executives;
Minimize the potential for automatic ratcheting-up of compensation that could occur within a narrow target among benchmark companies; and
In establishing theRespond to changing business conditions
The elements of Exxon Mobil Corporation and respective affiliates' compensation programs for B. W. Corson, D. E. Lyons, and S. P. Younger, including salary, annual bonus, program,and restricted stock units (long-term) compensation considerations, are generally similar to those of the executive resources committee:company.























1 Refer to definitions and frequently used terms on page 175
167

2023 business performance
In 2023, Imperial delivered strong business results across a wide range of performance dimensions.
·
considers input fromDelivered strong safety performance and effective enterprise risk management across the chairman, presidentorganization.
Recognized as one of Canada's top employers by Mediacorp Canada Inc. for the fourth consecutive year, and chief executive officerdesignated as a 2023 top employer for Canadians over 40 and for young people.
Commitment to sustainability
Published Imperial's Advancing Climate Solutions and Corporate Sustainability Reports.
Continued to progress the company's goals to reduce emissions intensity at its operated oil sands by 30% by 2030 compared with 2016 levels, and to achieve net zero (scope 1 and 2) by 2050 in operated assets through collaboration with government and industry partners.
Established Low Carbon Solutions organization, focused on performanceleveraging our unique capabilities in lower-emission technologies like renewable fuels, hydrogen and carbon capture and storage, to help customers meet their sustainability goals.
Progressed Pathways foundational carbon storage hub project to provide crucial infrastructure to support oil sands emission reductions.
Achieved start-up of the companyfinal boiler flue gas units at Kearl. The six units now operating have the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Received first-ever shipment of renewable diesel at Kearl for use in mine fleet as part of the company's ongoing effort to reduce emissions and fromdemonstrate suitability for use in heavy equipment.
Through Imperial's partnership, E3 Lithium commissioned the company’s internal compensation advisors regarding compensation trends as obtained from external consultants;Direct Lithium Extraction field pilot plant and began operations.
Reached new milestone with $4.6 billion spent on Indigenous businesses since 2008.
Financial performance
·
Strong operating performance and reliability performance.
considers the linkage to the majority shareholder’s bonus program given the company’s working interest is included in Exxon Mobil Corporation earnings;
·
considers annualAchieved net income of about $4.9 billion.
Generated substantial cash with $3.7 billion in cash flow from operating activities, and $6.4 billion in cash flow from operating activities excluding the company;impacts of working capital.1
Increased quarterly dividend to $0.50 per share in the second quarter, increasing the annual dividend paid for the 29th consecutive year. The dividend of $0.50 per share represents a 14% increase year over year.
Total shareholder returns of $4.9 billion; including dividends of $1.1 billion and share repurchases of $3.8 billion which includes a substantial issuer bid of $1.5 billion, and the accelerated completion of the company’s normal course issuer bid.
Upstream operations performance
In response to off-lease seepage at Kearl, the company expanded monitoring, interception and collection systems. The company also increased communications and engagement with local communities.
Produced 413,000 gross oil-equivalent barrels per day of full-year upstream production; driven by strong operations and a continued focus on low capital high return investments.
Kearl’s full year production was the highest in the asset’s history, bringing full year production to 270,000 gross oil-equivalent barrels per day (191,000 barrels Imperial's share).
Achieved best-ever quarterly production at Kearl of 308,000 gross oil-equivalent barrels per day (218,000 barrels Imperial's share) in the fourth quarter, and best-ever single-day production at Kearl of 363,000 gross oil-equivalent barrels per day (258,000 barrels Imperial's share) on December 25th.
Completed conversion of last remaining haul trucks at Kearl to autonomous operation, which helped capture significant improvements to truck productivity and workforce safety.
Produced 135,000 gross oil-equivalent barrels per day of full-year production at Cold Lake.
Started-up steam-injection at Cold Lake Grand Rapids Phase 1, which will be the first solvent-assisted SAGD project in industry and is expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions intensity by up to 40% compared to existing cyclic steam simulation technology.
Produced 76,000 gross oil-equivalent barrels per day of full-year production at Syncrude.
Advanced field trial of our Enhanced Bitumen Recovery Technology at Aspen to validate the technology and prepare for commercial use. This solvent technology has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions intensity by 60% versus SAGD production.
Downstream and Chemical operations performance
Achieved average throughput of 407,000 barrels per day with refinery capacity utilization of 94 percent, while completing significant turnaround activity on schedule and under budget at both the Strathcona and Sarnia refineries.
Achieved several full-year production records across the company's refineries.
Approved $720 million project to construct largest renewable diesel facility in Canada, located at Strathcona refinery, and commenced facility construction with renewable diesel production expected to begin in 2025.
Reliable operational performance supported Chemicals net income of $164 million.
·
uses judgment to manage the overall size of the annual bonus program taking into consideration the cyclical nature and long-term orientation of the business.
1non-GAAP financial measure – see definitions and frequently used terms section on page 175.
2021 decisions168
·
2021 bonus award was paid in full in year of grant rather than a combination of cash and earnings bonus units, consistent with market practice and resulting in a stronger link to earnings performance and individual performance differentiation.
·
This resulted in 49 executives receiving an annual bonus in 2021, compared to no executives who received an annual bonus in 2020. The cost of the 2021 annual bonus program was $4.2 million versus $0 in 2020 and $3.2 million in 2019.
Performance graph
While no earnings bonus units were grantedThe following graph shows changes over the past 5 years in 2021,the value of $100 invested in (i) Imperial Oil Limited common shares, (ii) the S&P/TSX Composite Index, and (iii) the S&P/TSX Composite Energy Index. The S&P/TSX Composite Energy Index is currently made up of share performance data for 41 oil and gas companies including integrated oil companies, oil and gas producers, and oil and gas service companies.
The year-end values in the graph represent appreciation in share price and the value of dividends paid and reinvested. The calculations exclude trading commissions and taxes. Total shareholder returns1 from each investment, whether measured in dollars or percent, can be calculated from the year-end investment values shown beneath the graph.
During the past 5 years, the company’s executives, including thecumulative total shareholder return1 was 151 percent, for an average annual return of 20 percent. Total direct compensation1 for named executive officers have outstanding earnings bonus units that have not vested.
·
Earnings bonus units are cash awards that are tied to future cumulative earnings per share.
·
Earnings bonus units pay out when a specified level of cumulative earnings per share (or trigger) is achieved or in three years at a reduced level. The trigger is intentionally set at a level that is expected to be achieved within the three-year period and reinforces the company’s principle of sustained improvement in the company’s business performance and aligns the interests of executives with those of long-term shareholders; and
·
If cumulative earnings per share do not reach the trigger within three years, the payment with respect to the earnings bonus units will be reduced to an amount equal to the number of units multiplied by the actual cumulative earnings per share over the three-year period. The amount of the award, once vested, will never exceed the original grant value. The delayed payout of the earnings bonus units puts part of the annual bonus at risk of forfeiture and thus reinforces the performance basis of the annual bonus grant.
The annual bonus, including earnings bonus units, are subject to forfeiture and claw-back if:
·
An executive retires before normal retirement time.
·
The company has indicated its intention not to forfeit outstanding awards of employees who retire at age 65. In other circumstances, where a recipient retires before age 65, the company may determine that awards shall not be forfeited.
·
An executive’s employment with the company terminates (for any reason, whether at initiative of employee, the company or otherwise) the company may determine that awards shall not be forfeited.
·
An executive, without the consent of the company, engages in any activity, during employment or after retirement or termination of employment, which is detrimental to the company, including working for a competitor; or
·
There is a material negative restatement of the company’s reported financial or operating results. For executive officers of the company, some or all of any unvested earnings bonus units granted in the three years prior to the restatement are subject to forfeiture. In addition, any cash amounts received from bonus or earnings bonus units that were paid out up to five years prior to the restatement are subject to claw-back.
162

Tablegenerally reflects the trend in total shareholder returns as the largest single component of Contents
Restricted stock units
The vesting periods of the company’s long-term incentive program are greater
than those in use by comparator companies.
The company’s long-term incentiveexecutive compensation plan is a restricted stock unit plan, in place since December 2002. Restricted stock units are granted to select employees of the company, select employees of a designated affiliate, and nonemployee directors of the company. The current plan’s vesting periods for employees are as follows:
Employee group
Vesting
On the anniversary of the date of grant
For the chairman, president and chief executive officer
          50 percent in 5 years and 50 percent in 10 years
For all other employees
          50 percent in 3 years and 50 percent in 7 years
Granting compensationawarded in the form of restricted stock units with long holding periods. This design reinforces the long-term linkage between executive compensation and the shareholding net worth of executives to the return on the company’s stock realized by shareholders.

Picture - Performance Graph.jpg







1 Refer to definitions and frequently used terms on page 175
169

2023 compensation actions
Chief executive officer
Mr. Corson is primarily responsible for executing the company's long-term strategic objectives while progressing plan goals in support of these objectives. His level of salary in 2023 was determined by the committee based on his individual performance and to align with that of his peers at Exxon Mobil Corporation. For 2023, the committee approved an increase of $80,000 USD to $884,000 USD ($1.19 million CAD). For 2024, the committee approved a salary increase of $35,400 USD to $919,400 USD. ($1.24 million CAD).
Mr. Corson’s 2023 annual bonus of $1.27 million USD ($1.71 million CAD) was based on his performance as assessed by the committee. His long-term incentive award of 86,800 restricted stock units was granted in the form of Imperial restricted stock units, not Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock, to reinforce alignment of his interests with that of the company’s shareholders. His company restricted stock units are subject to vesting periods longer than those applied by most companies. The purpose of these long vesting periods is alignedto reinforce the long investment lead times in the business and to link a substantial portion of Mr. Corson’s shareholding net worth to the performance of the company. As such, the realized value of the long-term incentive grants may differ from the amounts shown in the summary compensation table, depending on company performance at time of future vesting. During these vesting periods, the awards remain at risk of forfeiture even after retirement.
The committee has determined that the total compensation of Mr. Corson was appropriate based on the company’s financial and operating performance, and its assessment of his effectiveness in leading the organization relative to the business performance measures outlined on page 163.
Picture - Total Direct Compensation (3).jpg
2023 total direct compensation1 down 1.4 percent versus 2022 reflective of lower bonus program offset by an increase in share price.
70 percent of CEO total direct compensation1 delivered in the form of restricted stock units with long restriction periods.

1 Refer to definitions and frequently used terms on page 175. Amounts are shown in Canadian dollars.
170

Other named executive officers
Within the context of the compensation program structure and performance assessment processes previously described, the value of 2023 incentive awards and salary adjustments align with:
Performance of the company;
Individual performance;
Long-term strategic plan of the business; and
Annual compensation of comparator companies.
Taking all factors into consideration, the committee’s decisions on pay awarded to other named executive officers reflect judgment, rather than the application of formulae or targets. The committee approved the individual elements of compensation and the total compensation as shown in the summary compensation table.
Other compensation elements
Retirement plans
The company's approach to talent development stems from the need to develop future leaders broadly and deeply given the complexity and long-term nature of the company’s business. This stock program design helps keep executives focused onRetirement plans support the key premisecompany's talent management approach and are designed to attract and retain talent for a career. Retirement plans include:
A company savings plan that decisions made today affectis attractive to new hires who can begin building an account balance immediately upon achieving eligibility; and
Defined benefit plans, such as the performancecompany's pension plan, that help retain mid- and late-career employees until retirement eligibility. These are viewed as the primary vehicle for retirement planning.

Named executive officers participate in the same savings and pension plan, including supplemental pension arrangements outside the registered plan, as other employees, except for B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons and S.P. Younger who participate in Exxon Mobil Corporation or respective affiliates’ pension plans.

Below are brief descriptions of the organization and company stock for many years to come. This practice supports a risk/reward model that reinforces a long-term view, which is critical toplans. See the company’s sustainable business success, and discourages inappropriate risk taking.
The basis for the grant includes an annual assessment of individual performance including a review of business performance results as notedPension Benefits section on page 168. The amount granted is intended to provide an incentive to promote individual contribution to the company’s performance184 for more details.
PlanDescription
Savings plan
Employees with more than one year of service may contribute between 1 and 30 percent of normal earnings via payroll deductions.
The company provides matching contributions up to 6% which vary depending on the amount of employee contributions and which defined benefit pension arrangement the employee participates.
Employee and company contributions can be allocated in any combination to a non-registered (tax-paid) account, or a registered (tax-deferred) group retirement savings plan (RRSP), subject to contribution limits under the Income Tax Act.
Registered pension
plan
The company provides a registered defined pension benefit when leaving the company if age, service, and other provisions under the plan are met.
Benefit available in various annuity forms upon retirement.
Subject to income tax regulations that impose limits on the amounts that can be paid from a registered plan.
Provides for pension benefits accrual only until December 1st in the year the employee reaches the age of 71.
The company does not grant additional pension service credit.
Supplemental
pension
arrangement
Addresses any portions of the defined benefit that cannot be paid from the registered plan due to income tax regulations.
Executive officers who receive an annual bonus, can also receive an annual supplemental pension benefit resulting from the annual bonus.
May be taken as a lump sum or an annuity.
Not payable if an employee resigns or is terminated with cause before reaching retirement eligibility.

171

Award vesting and to retain employees. The restricted stock unit program awards the same number of shares for individuals with the same level of individual performance and pay grade or level of responsibility. Grants may be adjusted periodically based on an assessment of the program’s competitive orientation. An individual’s grant amount may be reduced at time of grant, if recent performance is deemed to have changed significantly at that time. As a matter of principle, the company does not offset losses on prior grants with higher share awards in subsequent grants, nor does the company
re-priceutilization
restricted stock units. Restricted stock units are not included in pension calculations.
The number of common shares of the company issuable under the plan to any insiders (as defined by the Toronto Stock Exchange) cannot exceed 10 percent of the issued and outstanding common shares, whether at any time, or as issued in any one year.

Consistent withThe company’s directors and officers as a group hold approximately 19 percent of the program documentation,unvested restricted stock units that give the boardrecipient the right to receive common shares that represent about 0.05 percent of directorsthe company’s outstanding common shares. Currently, the maximum number of common shares that any one person may amend the plan without shareholder approval for RSUs previously issued or to be issued in the future, unless the amendment is with respect to:
·
increasing the shares served for issuance;
·
increasingreceive from the vesting price;
·
extending eligibility to participate in the plan to persons not included in the plan;
·
extending the right of a grantee to transfer or assign RSUs; or
·
adjusting the vesting date for any RSUs previously granted.
2021 decisions
·
The executive resources committee granted awards in keeping with program design; no
make-up
grants to address lower value of 2020 award grants.
·
The value of long-term awards increased year-over-year, reflecting stock price recovery; changes in award grants for named executive officers reflect individual performance and/or change in pay grade.
·
In 2021, 386 recipients, including 57 executives, were granted 680,720 restricted stock units.
163

Vesting of restricted stock units
The vesting periods, is 72,500 common shares, which are typically greater than those in use by other companies, reinforce the company’s focus on growing shareholder value over the long term by linking a large percentage of executive compensation and the shareholding net worth of executives to the valueis about 0.01 percent of the company’s stock. The long vesting periods ensure that a substantial portion of the compensation received by the chairman, president and chief executive officer, as well as other key senior executives, will be received after retirement. The value of this compensation is at risk in the event that their decisions prior to retirement negatively impact share market value after retirement. The objective of these aforementioned vesting periods is to hold senior executives accountable for many years into the future, and even into retirement, for investment and operating decisions made today. This type of compensation design removes employee discretion in the timing of exercising restricted stock units, reinforces retention objectives, and supports alignment with the long-term interests of shareholders.
outstanding common shares.
Restricted stock units cannot be assigned. The vesting period for restricted stock unit awards is not subject to acceleration, except in the case of death.
Upon vesting, each restricted stock unit entitles the recipient the right to receive an amount equal to the value of one common share of the company, based on the five dayfive-day average closing price of the company’s shares on the vesting date and the four preceding trading days. For units granted to senior executives other thanUnits that vest on the chairman, president and chief executive officer, 50 percentthird anniversary of the unitsgrant date vest as a cash payment. Units that vest on the fifth, seventh, or tenth anniversary of the grant date vest as a cash payment, on the third and seventh anniversary of the grant date, except that for units vesting on the seventh anniversary that were granted to Canadian residents, the recipient may receive one common share per unit or elect to receive a cash payment for the units. For all units granted to the chairman, president and chief executive officer, upon vesting, the recipient may receive one common share of the company per unit or elect to receive a cash payment for the units. During the restricted period, the recipient will also receive cash payments equivalent to the cash dividends paid to holders of regular common stock.

The company’sConsistent with the program documentation, the board of directors and officers as a group hold approximately 13 percent ofmay amend the unvested restricted stock units that giveplan without shareholder approval for RSUs previously issued or to be issued in the recipientfuture, unless the amendment is with respect to:
Increasing the shares served for issuance;
Increasing the vesting price;
Extending eligibility to participate in the plan to persons not included in the plan;
Extending the right of a grantee to receive common shares that represent about 0.03 percent of the company’s outstanding common shares. Currently, the maximum number of common shares that any one person may receive fromtransfer or assign RSUs; or
Adjusting the vesting of restricted stock units is 394,750 common shares, which is about 0.06 percent of the outstanding common shares. date for any RSUs previously granted.

In the case of any subdivision, consolidation, or reclassification of the shares of the company or other relevant change in the capitalization of the company, the company, inat its discretion, may make appropriate adjustments in the number of common shares to be issued and the calculation of the cash amount payable per restricted stock unit.
Granting practices
Exxon Mobil Corporation has a plan similarThe executive resources committee ("committee") grants annual incentive awards to the company’s executive officers at its regular November meeting.Incentive awards are granted to other eligible employees within the parameters of the bonus and restricted stock unit plan, under which grantees may receive restrictedaward ceilings approved by the committee.
The company’s compensation program does not include granting stock or restrictedoptions. No stock units, both of which are referred to herein as Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock. B.W. Corson holds Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock granted in 2018 and previous years, as well as the company’s restricted stock unitsoptions have been granted since 2019. D.E. Lyons holds Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock granted in 20172002 and previous years, as well as the company’s restricted stock units granted since 2018. S.P. Younger holds Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock granted in 2019 and previous years, as well as the company’s restricted stock units granted in 2020.
Restricted stock unitsthere are subjectno plans to forfeiture and claw-back if:
·
A recipient retires before normal retirement time.
·
The company has indicated its intention not to forfeit restricted stock units of employees who retire at age 65. In other circumstances where a recipient retires before age 65, the company may determine that restricted stock units shall not be forfeited.
·
A recipient’s employment with the company terminates (for any reason, whether at initiative of employee, the company or otherwise) the company may determine that restricted stock units shall not be forfeited.
·
A recipient, without the consent of the company, engages in any activity, during employment or after retirement or termination of employment, which is detrimental to the company, including working for a competitor.
·
With respect to executives, at any time prior to vesting of the outstanding awards.
·
With respect to all other employees, for a period of up to three years after retirement or the termination of employment.
164

Amendments to the restricted stock unit plan
In 2011, the restricted stock unit plan was amended to include language confirming the long-standing practice of not forfeiting any restricted stock unitsmake such grants in the event that the grantee’s continued employment terminates on or after the date the grantee reaches the age of 65 in circumstances where the grantee becomes entitled to an annuity under the company’s retirement plan.
future.
In 2016, the restricted stock unit plan was amended to update provisions regarding forfeiture of restricted stock units in the event of detrimental activity, extending the period from two years to the current periods noted above. Further, the amendments provided a new vesting option in addition to the existing vesting options previously described, such that the second 50 percent of the restricted stock units may vest on the tenth anniversary following the grant date.
Amendments
In 2020, the restricted stock unit plan was amended to update provisions regarding the vesting periods for the units granted in 2020 and onwards to the chairman, president and chief executive officer such that 50 percent of restricted stock units vest on the fifth anniversary and remaining 50 percent on the tenth anniversary. For awards granted prior to 2020, the vesting of the tenth anniversary portion of the award is delayed until retirement ifthe later thanof 10 years.
Retirement benefits
Named executive officers participate in the same pension plan, including supplemental pension arrangements outside the registered plan, as other employees, except for B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons and S.P. Younger who participate in Exxon Mobil Corporationyears or respective affiliates’ pension plans.
Pension plan benefits
The company has provided defined benefit pension plans to its employees since 1919. The current pension plan provides a 1.5 percent accrual formula to all employees hired on and after September 1, 2015. All plan participants employed prior to the date of the change will continue to accrue pension benefits based on accrual formulae in place prior to September 1, 2015. The pension plan provides for pension benefits accrual only until December 1st in the year the employee reaches the age of 71. The company’s
non-registered
supplemental pension arrangements address any portions of the defined benefit that cannot be paid from the registered plan due to income tax regulations that impose limits on the amounts that can be paid from a registered plan.
Any pension amounts paid to an eligible employee are subject to the employee meeting the terms of the registered pension plan, and if applicable, the criteria of the supplemental pension arrangements. No supplemental pension amounts are payable if an employee resigns before reaching retirement eligibility.
For executive officers who receive an annual bonus, the company’s supplemental pension arrangements can also provide an annual benefit of either 1.5 percent or 1.6 percent of final average bonus earnings multiplied by years of service depending on the plan in which they participate. Final average bonus earnings include the average annual bonus for the three highest grants of the last five bonus years awarded prior to retirement for eligible executives, but do not include restricted stock units. Limiting the final average bonus earnings to the awards granted in the five bonus years prior to retirement provides a strong incentive for executives to continue to perform at a high level. Annual bonus could include the cash amounts that are paid at grant and the maximum settlement value of any earnings bonus units received, as described starting on page 162. The value of the earnings bonus units are expected to pay out, subject to forfeiture provisions, and are therefore included for supplemental pension arrangement purposes in the year of grant rather than the year of payment.
The estimated benefits that would be payable upon retirement to each named executive officer under the company’s pension plan and the supplemental pension arrangements can be found in the pension plan benefits table starting on page 177. The company does not grant additional pension service credit.
B.A. Jolly and J.R. Wetmore participate in the previous 1.6 percent provision of the company’s plan that was closed to new participants at the end of 1997. Key features of this historic plan include:
·
An annual benefit equal to 1.6 percent multiplied by final average earnings multiplied by years of service, with a partial offset for applicable government pension benefits. Final average earnings consists of base salary over the highest 36 consecutive months in the 10 years of service prior to retirement.
·
An option to forego a portion of the company’s matching contributions to the savings plan in order to receive an additional 0.4 percent of final average earnings.
165

B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons and S.P. Younger are not participants in the company’s pension plan, but are participants in the Exxon Mobil Corporation or respective affiliates’ pension plans:
·
Mr. Corson and Mr. Lyons participate in the Exxon Mobil Corporation defined benefit plan. Under this plan, the pension is payable in U.S. dollars and is calculated based on final average base salary over the highest 36 consecutive months in the 10 years of service prior to retirement, and the average annual bonus for the three highest grants of the last five awarded prior to retirement, but do not include restricted stock units.
·
Mr. Younger participates in the Esso Australia Pty Ltd. defined benefit plan. Under this plan, the pension is payable in Australian dollars and is calculated based on final average base salary over the highest 12 consecutive months in the 10 years of service prior to retirement.
Savings plan benefits
The company maintains a savings plan into which career employees with more than one year of service may contribute between 1 and 30 percent of normal earnings. The company provides contributions which vary depending on the amount of employee contributions and which defined benefit pension arrangement the employee participates. All named executive officers are eligible to receive a company matching contribution of up to 6 percent, except for B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons, and S.P. Younger, who participate in their respective affiliates’ savings plan, where applicable.
Employee and company contributions can be allocated in any combination to a
non-registered
(tax-paid)
account, or a registered
(tax-deferred)
group retirement savings plan (RRSP). Employee contributions can be redirected from the
tax-paid
account to a
tax-free
savings account (TFSA). Both the RRSP and TFSA accounts are subject to contribution limits under the
Income Tax Act
.
Available investment options include cash savings, a money market mutual fund, a suite of four index-based equity or bond mutual funds, and company shares. Assets in the RRSP account and company contributions to the
tax-paid
account may only be withdrawn upon retirement or termination of employment, reinforcing the company’s long-term approach to total compensation. Income tax regulations require RRSPs to be converted into an eligible form of retirement income by the end of the calendar year in which the individual reaches age 71.
166

Compensation decision making process and considerations for named executive officers
Benchmarking
In addition to the assessment of business performance, individual performance and level of responsibility, the executive resources committee relies on market comparisons to a group of major Canadian companies.
Comparator companies
The following criteria are used to select comparator companies:
·
Canadian companies or Canadian affiliates;
·
large operating scope and complexity;
·
capital intensive; and
·
proven sustainability.
List of comparator companies:
·
Energy:
Canadian Natural Resources Limited, Cenovus Energy Inc., Chevron Canada Ltd., China National Offshore Oil Corporation, ConocoPhillips Canada, Enbridge Inc., Irving Oil Ltd., NOVA Chemicals Corporation, Nutrien Ltd., Ovintiv Inc., Repsol Oil & Gas Canada Inc., Shell Canada Limited, Suncor Energy Inc., TC Energy Corporation, Valero Energy
·
Non-energy:
BCE Inc., Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited, General Electric Canada, IBM Canada Ltd., Proctor & Gamble Inc., Royal Bank of Canada
The company is a national employer drawing from a wide range of disciplines. It is important to understand its competitive orientation relative to a variety of energy and
non-energy
employers. Compensation trends across industries, based on survey data, are prepared annually by an independent external consultant with additional analysis and recommendation provided by the company’s internal compensation advisors. Consistent with the executive resources committee’s practice of using well-informed judgment rather than formulae to determine executive compensation, the committee does not target any specific percentile among comparator companies to align compensation. The focus is on a broader and more flexible orientation, generally a range around the median of the comparator energy companies’ compensation. This approach applies to salaries and the annual incentive program that includes annual bonus and restricted stock units.
As a secondary sourceresult of data, the executive resources committee also considers a comparison with the majority shareholder when it determines the annual bonus program. Foran employee stock program expansion implemented in 2022, the restricted stock unit program, the executive resources committee may review a summary of comparator company data provided by the same external consultantplan was amended to include an additional vesting schedule, in order to assist in assessing total value of long-term compensation grants. As a result, grant level guidelines maywhich some non-executive participants will be adjusted periodically to maintain the program’s competitive orientation. As a matter of principle, the company does not offset losses on prior grants with higher shareeligible for awards in subsequent grants, nor does the company
re-price
restricted stock units.
This overall approach provides the company with the ability to:
·
better respond to changing business conditions;
·
manage salaries based on a career orientation;
·��
minimize potential for automatic increasing of salaries, which could occur with an inflexible and narrow target among benchmarked companies; and
·
differentiate executives’ salaries based on performance and experience levels.
The elements of Exxon Mobil Corporation and respective affiliates’ compensation programs for B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons and S.P. Younger, including salary, annual bonus and restricted stock units (long-term) compensation considerations, are generally similar to those of the company.
granted that vest 100 percent after 3 years.
2021 named executive officer compensation assessment
When determining the annual compensation for the named executive officers, the executive resources committee has reflected on the following business performance result indicators in its determination of 2021 salary and incentive compensation.
167
172

Business performance results for consideration
The operatingRisk and financial performance results listed below and the company’s continued maintenance of sound business controls and a strong corporate governance environment formed the basis for the salary and incentive award decisions made by the executive resources committee in 2021. The executive resources committee considered the results over multiple years, relative to the company’s proven business model and strategies, to deliver long-term shareholder value.


Compensation program underpinned by strong governance practices that discourage inappropriate risk taking
Executive stock ownership
Long holding periods on restricted stock units (RSUs) results in executives maintaining significant stock ownership during employment and for 7 years into retirement, with a longer holding period for the chairman, president and chief executive officer up to 10 years into retirement.
Significant pay at risk
Uniquely long restriction periods on RSUs substantially increase the percentage of career compensation at risk well into retirement.
2021 Key business results
Unvested RSUs cannot be used as collateral for any purpose and cannot be assigned.
·Strong forfeiture provisions
Unvested RSUs are at risk of forfeiture in the event of resignation, termination of employment, early retirement and/or detrimental activity, even if such detrimental activity occurs or is discovered after retirement.
ContinuedIn the event of retirement prior to protect our workforce duringage 65 but after eligibility for early retirement (i.e., at least 55 years of age with at least 10 years of service), the pandemicexecutive resources committee, in the case of an executive officer, must approve the retention of awards. Forfeiture provisions remain in place until an award has vested, including those that vest post retirement.
Clawback policies
In the event of a material negative restatement of the company's reported financial or operating results, the Board is authorized to take actions it deems necessary and delivered strong safety performanceappropriate, including the recoupment (clawback) of any bonus paid to an executive officer.
Policies reflect the company's high ethical standards and effective enterprisestrict compliance with accounting and other regulations applicable to public companies, including compliance with Rule 10D-1 of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Anti-hedging/derivative policy
Company policy prohibits all employees, including executives, and directors, from being a party to a derivative or similar financial instrument, including puts, calls, or other options, future or forward contracts, or equity swaps or collars, with respect to the company or Exxon Mobil Corporation stock.
Annual assessment of compensation design
The executive resources committee ("committee") reviews the effectiveness and competitiveness of the compensation program design annually, and approves annual compensation recommendations for each named executive officer prior to implementation.
The committee is responsible for overseeing the compensation program and practices that are designed to encourage appropriate risk assessment and risk management. For further discussion on the company's risk management system and oversight, see "Risk oversight" on page 133.
Independent compensation consultant
In 2023, the committee did not retain an independent consultant or advisor in determining compensation for any of the company’s officers or any other senior executives.
• The company’s management retained an independent consultant to provide an assessment of competitive compensation and market data for all salaried levels of employees in the company. While providing this data, they did not provide individual compensation recommendations or advice for the compensation of the chairman, president, and chief executive officer or other senior executives.
173

·
No severance agreements
The company does not have written employment contracts or any other agreement with it's named executive officers providing for payments on change in control or termination of employment.
RecognizedEliminates any real or perceived "safety net" with respect to job security and increases the risk and consequences to the individual for performance that does not meet the highest standards.

No change in control arrangements
No guaranteed bonuses
Bonus remains at risk, subject to year-on-year changes in performance.
Demonstrated by bonus program suspension in 2020; no award granted.
No additional stock grants to balance losses in value
The committee sets the size of the restricted stock unit program and does not offset a loss or gain in the value of prior restricted stock units by the value of current-year grants.
Such a practice would minimize the risk/reward profile of stock-based awards and undermine the long-term view that executives are expected to adopt.
No accelerated vesting at retirement
Restricted stock units (RSUs) are not subject to acceleration, not even at retirement, except in the case of death.
Unvested RSUs cannot be used as one of Canada’s best employers by Forbes and one of Canada’s top employers by Mediacorp Canada Inc.
collateral for any purpose.
·
Demonstrated clear commitment to sustainability:
·
Published Imperial’s Corporate Sustainability Report.
·
Announced the launch of the Oil Sands Pathways to Net Zero industry alliance.
·
In January 2022, announced plans for further greenhouse gas emissions intensity reductions at the company’s operated oil sands facilities, anticipating a 30 percent reduction by 2030, compared to 2016 levels in support of its goal to achieve net zero emissions in its operated oil sands assets by 2050.
·
Awarded silver level of certification with Progressive Aboriginal Relations.
·
Strong financial performance:
·
Positioned Imperial to take advantage of higher commodity prices by structurally lowering operating and capital expenditures.
·
Net income of $2,479 million, driven by attractive market conditions, structural cost reductions, and reliable operations.
·
Generated about $5.5 billion in cash flow from operating activities and with disciplined capital spending achieved about $4.5 billion in free cash flow*.
·
Increased quarterly dividend to $0.27 per share starting in the second quarter of 2021, increasing the annual dividend paid for the 27th consecutive year while maintaining stable debt levels.
·
Record shareholder returns of nearly $3 billion; including dividends of about $0.7 billion and share repurchases of about $2.2 billion under its normal course issuer bid.
·
Strong Upstream operational performance:
·
428,000 gross
oil-equivalent
barrels per day of full-year upstream production; the highest in over 30 years driven by reliability improvements, production recovery and capacity enhancements, and continued focused, high return investment.
·
Highest ever annual total gross production at Kearl of 263,000 barrels per day.
·
Following implementation of a multi-year plan, successfully transitioned Kearl to a single annual turnaround, one year ahead of schedule.
·
Successful startup of first Kearl Boiler flue gas unit reducing both operating expenses and greenhouse gas emissions.
·
Increased year-over-year production at Cold Lake driven by higher reliability and production enhancement initiatives including field optimizations and drilling.
·
Successfully started the Liquid Addition to Steam for Enhanced Recovery (LASER) Project at Cold Lake’s Mahkeses plant. This latest deployment of Imperial’s enhanced recovery solvent technology improves productivity and is expected to enable up to a 25 percent greenhouse gas intensity reduction for the associated production.
·
Syncrude operatorship successfully transferred from Syncrude Canada to Suncor; in an effort to maximize profitability and improve reliability for the asset.
·
Strong Downstream and Chemical operational performance:
·
Refinery capacity utilization for 2021 increased by nine percent to 89 percent despite a significant turnaround at Strathcona.
·
Progressed Sarnia Products Pipeline project to increase capacity, improve reliability of supply, and structurally lower logistics costs and increase sales in the high-value Toronto market.
·
Announced plans to construct a world-class renewable diesel complex at Strathcona refinery; a final investment decision is expected in the fourth quarter of 2022 and will be based on several factors.
·
Record diluent production at Strathcona and record asphalt production at Nanticoke.
·
Strong polyethylene margins and asset reliability led to highest full-year Chemicals net income in over 30 years of $361 million.

*non-GAAP
financial measure – see
Frequently used terms
section on page 171 for definition and reconciliation.
168
174

Table of Contents
Performance assessment considerations
The preceding results formDefinitions and frequently used terms
Please also refer to the context in which the committee assesses the individual performance of each senior executive, taking into account experience and level of responsibility. Annually, the chairman, president, and chief executive officer reviews the performance"Frequently used terms" section of the senior executives in achieving business resultscompany's Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional definitions and individual development needs.
reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures.

The same long-term key business strategies noted on page 157Compensation benchmark companies consist of Canadian Natural Resources Limited, Cenovus Energy Inc., CNOOC International, ConocoPhillips Canada, Crescent Point Energy, Enbridge Inc., Gibson Energy, Irving Oil Ltd., MEG Energy, NOVA Chemicals Corporation, Nutrien Ltd., Ovintiv Inc., Parkland Corporation, Repsol Oil & Gas Canada Inc., Shell Canada Limited, Suncor Energy Inc., TC Energy Corporation, Valero Energy, BCE Inc., Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Canadian Tire Corporation, General Electric Canada, IBM Canada Ltd., and the company’s business performance results are key elements in the assessment of the chairman, president, and chief executive officer’s performance by the executive resources committee.
Teck Resources.

The performance of all named executive officersTotal reported pay is also assessed by the board of directors throughout the year during specific business reviews and board committee meetings that provide information on strategy development, operating and financial results, safety, health, and environmental results, business controls, and other areas pertinent to the general performance of the company.
The executive resources committee does not use quantitative targets or formulae to assess individual executive performance or determine compensation. The executive resources committee does not assign weights to the factors considered. Formula-based performance assessments andtotal compensation typically require emphasis on two or three business metrics. For the company to be an industry leader and effectively manage the technical complexity and integrated scope of its operations, most senior executives must advance multiple strategies and objectives in parallel, versus emphasizing one or two at the expense of others that require equal attention.
Senior executives and officers are expected to perform at the highest level or they are replaced. If it is determined that another executive is ready and would make a stronger contribution than one of the current incumbents, a replacement plan is implemented.
2021 chief executive officer compensation assessment
B.W. Corson was appointed to the board and as president of the company on September 17, 2019 and assumed the additional roles of chairman and chief executive officer on January 1, 2020. Mr. Corson worked for Exxon Mobil Corporation and its predecessor companies since 1983. His level of salary in 2021 was determined by the executive resources committee based on his individual performance and to align with that of his peers in ExxonMobil, and was held at 2020 levels reflective of market conditions at the time of decision. It was also the objective of the executive resources committee to ensure appropriate internal alignment with senior management in the company. For 2022, the committee approved a salary increase of $31,000 U.S. to $804,000 U.S. effective January 1, 2022.
Mr. Corson’s 2021 annual bonus was based on his performance as assessed by the executive resources committee since his appointment to the position of chairman, president, and chief executive officer. His long-term incentive award was granted in the form of company restricted stock units, not Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock, to reinforce alignment of his interests with that of the company’s shareholders. His company restricted stock units are subject to vesting periods longer than those applied by most companies. 50 percent of the restricted stock units awarded vest in five years and the other 50 percent vest in ten years from the date of grant. The purpose of these long vesting periods is to reinforce the long investment lead times in the business and to link a substantial portion of Mr. Corson’s shareholding net worth to the performance of the company. As such, the payout value of the long-term incentive grants may differ from the amounts shownreported in the summary compensation table, depending on how the company actually performs at time of future vesting. During these vesting periods, the awards are subject to risk of forfeiture based on detrimental activity even after retirement.
table.
The executive resources committee has determined that the total compensation of Mr. Corson was appropriate based on the company’s financial and operating performance, and its assessment of his effectiveness in leading the organization relative to the business performance measures outlined on page 160. Taking all factors into consideration, the committee’s decisions on compensation of the chief executive officer reflect judgment, rather than the application of formulae or targets.

169

Table of Contents
Pay awarded to other named executive officers
Within the context of the compensation program structure and performance assessment processes previously described, the value of 2021 incentive awards and salary adjustments align with:
·
performance of the company;
·
individual performance;
·
long-term strategic plan of the business; and
·
annual compensation of comparator companies.
Taking all factors into consideration, the executive resources committee’s decisions on pay awarded to other named executive officers reflect judgment, rather than the application of formulae or targets. The executive resources committee approved the individual elements of compensation and the total compensation as shown in the summary compensation table on page 172.
Independent consultant
In fulfilling its responsibilities during 2021, the executive resources committee did not retain an independent consultant or advisor in determining compensation for any of the company’s officers or any other senior executives. The company’s management retained an independent consultant to provide an assessment of competitive compensation and market data for all salaried levels of employees of the company. While providing this data, they did not provide individual compensation recommendations or advice for the compensation of the chairman, president and chief executive officer or other senior executives.
Performance graph
The following graph shows changes over the past 5 years in the value of $100 invested in (i) Imperial Oil Limited common shares, (ii) the S&P/TSX Composite Index, and (iii) the S&P/TSX Composite Energy Index. The S&P/TSX Composite Energy Index is currently made up of share performance data for 32 oil and gas companies including integrated oil companies, oil and gas producers, and oil and gas service companies.
The
year-end
values in the graph represent appreciation in share price and the value of dividends paid and reinvested. The calculations exclude trading commissions and taxes. Total shareholder returns from each investment, whether measured in dollars or percent, can be calculated from the
year-end
investment values shown beneath the graph.
During the past 5 years, the company’s cumulative total shareholder return was 11 percent, for an average annual return of 2.1 percent. Total direct compensation for named executive officers generally reflects the trend in total shareholder returns as the largest single component of executive compensation is awarded in the form of restricted stock units with long holding periods. This design reinforces the long-term linkage between executive compensation and the shareholding net worth of executives to the return on the company’s stock realized by shareholders. Total direct compensation includes salary, the annual bonus grant, and the grant date fair value of the restricted stock unit award which is equal to the price of the company’s common shares on the date of grant.

170

Table of Contents
Frequently used terms
The term total direct compensation is compensation granted during the year, including salary, the annualcurrent year bonus, and the grant date fair value of the restricted stock unit award which is equal to the price of the company’s common shares on the date of grant.
units.

Non-GAAP financial measures
The following definitions are used in the compensation discussion and analysis as several of Imperial’s business and financial performance measures. These measures are not prescribed by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). These measures constitute
“non-GAAP
“non-GAAP financial measures” under Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation G and Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K, and “specified financial measures” under National Instrument
52-112
Non-GAAP
and Other Financial Measures Disclosure of the Canadian Securities Administrators.
Reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measure, and other information required by these regulations, has been provided below or is available in the “Frequently used terms” section of the company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. Non-GAAP
financial measures and specified financial measures are not standardized financial measures under GAAP and do not have standardized definitions. As such, these measures may not be directly comparable to measures presented by other companies, and should not be considered a substitute for GAAP financial measures. For additional information

Cash flow from operating activities and reconciliation with respectasset sales (CFOAS) is the sum of the net cash provided by operating activities and proceeds from asset sales reported in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Return on average capital employed (ROCE) is a measure of capital productivity, and equals net income excluding the after-tax cost of financing divided by total average capital employed. Capital employed is property, plant and equipment, and other assets, less liabilities, excluding both short-term and long-term debt, plus the company’s share of equity company debt.
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities excluding working capital is a non-GAAP financial measure that is the total cash flows from operating activities less the changes in operating assets and liabilities in the period. The most directly comparable financial measure that is disclosed in the financial statements is "Cash flows from (used in) operating activities" within the company’s Consolidated statement of cash flows. Management believes it is useful for investors to consider these numbers in comparing the terms, seeunderlying performance of the “Frequently used terms”company’s business across periods when there are significant period-to-period differences in the amount of changes in working capital. Changes in working capital is equal to “Changes in operating assets and liabilities” as disclosed in the company’s Consolidated statement of cash flows. This measure assesses the cash flows at an operating level, and as such, does not include proceeds from asset sales as defined in Cash flows from operating activities and asset sales in the Frequently Used Terms section of the company’s most recent Annual Report onannual Form 10-K.
10-K.











175
·
Cash flow from operating activities and asset sales is a
non-GAAP
financial measure that is the sum of the net cash provided by operating activities and proceeds from asset sales reported in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
·
Return on average capital employed is a
non-GAAP
financial measure that is a measure of capital productivity, and equals net income excluding the
after-tax
cost of financing divided by total average capital employed. Capital employed is property, plant and equipment, and other assets, less liabilities, excluding both short-term and long-term debt, plus the company’s share of equity company debt.
·
Free cash flow is a
non-GAAP
financial measure that is cash flows from operating activities less additions to property, plant and equipment and equity company investments plus proceeds from asset sales. The most directly comparable financial measure that is disclosed in the financial statements is cash flows from (used in) operating activities within the company’s consolidated statement of cash flows. This measure is used to evaluate cash available for financing activities (including but not limited to dividends and share purchases) after investment in the business.
Reconciliation of free cash flow
flows from (used in) operating activities excluding working capital
millions of Canadian dollars
2021 
2023
From Imperial’sthe Consolidated statement of cash flows
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities
3,734
Less changes in working capital
5,476 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities(2,701)
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities excl. working capital6,435
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure that is cash flows from operating activities less additions to property, plant and equipment and equity company investments plus proceeds from asset sales. The most directly comparable financial measure that is disclosed in the financial statements is "Cash flows from (used in) operating activities" within the company’s Consolidated statement of cash flows. This measure is used to evaluate cash available for financing activities (including but not limited to dividends and share purchases) after investment in the business.
Reconciliation of free cash flow
millions of Canadian dollars2023
From the Consolidated statement of cash flows
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities
3,734
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment
(1,785)
(1,108) 
Proceeds from asset sales
86
81 
Additional investments
Loans to equity companies - net5
15 
Free cash flow
2,040
4,464 
Total shareholder return (TSR) measures the change in value of an investment in stock over a specified period of time, assuming dividend reinvestment. TSR is subject to many different variables, including factors beyond the control of management.

Share-denominated approach: annual equity grant is based on a fixed number of shares; aligns award values with shareholder outcomes. Imperial uses this approach; results in a greater degree of volatility than a dollar-denominated approach.

Dollar-denominated approach: annual equity grant is based on target dollar value with underlying units adjusted to achieve target value. Market common approach; results in less volatility than a share-denominated award.

Stock ownership includes vested shares, unvested restricted shares, and shares underlying unvested restricted stock units.

Statements regarding plans, objectives, and other future events or conditions are forward-looking statements. See the “Forward-looking statements” section for important additional information about these statements, including factors that could cause actual results to differ materially.

171
176

Table of Contents
Executive compensation tables and narratives
Summary compensation table
The following table shows the compensation for the chairman, president and chief executive officer; the senior vice-president, finance and administration, and controller; and the three other most highly compensated executive officers of the company who were serving as of the end of 2021. B.W. Corson was appointed to the board and as president of the company on September 17, 2019 and assumed the additional roles of chairman and chief executive officer on January 1, 2020.2023.
The information in the Summarysummary compensation table includes the Canadian dollar value of base salaries, cash bonus awards, and earnings bonus unit payments, long-term incentive compensation and certain other compensation. Amounts

Name and principal
position at the end of
2023
Year
Salary
($)
(b)
Share-
based
awards
($)
(c)
Option-
based
awards
($)
(d)
 
Non-equity incentive
plan compensation
($)
Pension
value
($)
(g)
All other
compensation
($)
(h)
Total
compensation
($)
(i)
Annual
incentive
plans
(e)
Long-term
incentive
plans
(f)
B.W. Corson (a)
Chairman, president
and chief executive
officer (since
January 1, 2020)
20231,193,1356,694,0161,707,3712,461,7642,775,24414,831,530
20221,046,2456,463,1802,223,922727,4274,905,5671,975,18217,341,523
2021

968,9563,447,056956,4211,200,0912,178,0258,750,549
D.E. Lyons (a)
Senior vice-president,
finance and
administration, and
controller (since
May 1, 2018)
2023785,5252,390,720719,390850,5491,088,5905,834,774
2022688,3881,917,168890,089298,6421,850,5281,798,9337,443,748
2021646,8061,163,712439,979463,757784,1043,498,358
S.P. Younger (a)
Senior vice-president,
upstream (since
July 1, 2020)
2023581,6181,526,976406,93565,136665,9663,246,631
2022574,3451,597,640565,155170,133346,566709,8623,963,701
2021

545,996714,096250,44981,762415,5052,007,808
B.A. Jolly
Treasurer (since
August 1, 2023)
2023526,8401,218,496340,5831,060,000170,5283,316,447
2022472,5001,234,540469,657140,4481,306,400118,3153,741,860
2021450,000749,360237,332268,90091,4871,797,079
S.L. Evers
Senior vice-president, sustainability, commercial development and product solutions (since
May 1, 2023)
2023411,8771,033,408294,650427,30084,7102,251,945
2022
2021

Refer to footnotes starting on page 178.
177

Total directcompensation
The following pro forma table displays total direct compensation, which includes salary, bonus, and stock award value. In its pay deliberations, the executive resources committee considers total direct compensation as it excludes the volatility that results from changes in pension value and all other compensation.
NameYear
Salary
($)
(b)
Bonus
($)
(e)
Restricted stock units
($)
(c)
Total direct
compensation
($)
(i)
B.W. Corson (a)20231,193,1351,707,3716,694,0169,594,522
20221,046,2452,223,9226,463,1809,733,347
2021968,956956,4213,447,0565,372,433
 D.E. Lyons (a)
2023785,525719,3902,390,7203,895,635
2022688,388890,0891,917,1683,495,645
2021646,806439,9791,163,7122,250,497
 S.P. Younger (a)
2023581,618406,9351,526,9762,515,529
2022574,345565,1551,597,6402,737,140
2021545,996250,449714,0961,510,541
B.A. Jolly2023526,840340,5831,218,4962,085,919
2022472,500469,6571,234,5402,176,697
2021450,000237,332749,3601,436,692
S.L. Evers2023411,877294,6501,033,4081,739,935
2022
2021


Footnotes to summary compensation and total direct compensation tables on pages 177 through 178
(a)Affiliate employees. The compensation for B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons, and S.P. Younger is paid directly by Exxon Mobil Corporation and respective affiliates, with the table pertainexception of the compensation related to the named executive officers’vesting of the company’s restricted stock units and dividend equivalents on outstanding restricted stock units. They also receive employee benefits under their respective periodsaffiliates’ employee benefit plans, and not under the company’s employee benefit plans. The company reimburses the respective affiliates for applicable compensation paid and employee benefits provided to them. The company does not reimburse Exxon Mobil Corporation for the cost of assignment with the company.
incentive awards granted by Exxon Mobil Corporation.
Name and principal
position at the end of
2021
  
Year
  
Salary
($)
(c)
  
Share-
based
awards
($)
(d)
  
Option-
based
awards
($)
(e)
  
 
Non-equity
incentive
plan compensation
($)
  
Pension
value
($)
(h)
  
All other
compensation
($)
(i)
  
Total
compensation
($)
(j)
  
Annual
incentive
plans
(f)
  
Long-term
incentive
plans
(g)
  
2021
  
968,956
  
3,447,056
  
-
  
956,421
  
0
  
1,200,091
  
2,178,025
  
8,750,549
B.W. Corson (b)
Chairman, president
and chief executive
officer (since
September 17, 2019)
                  
  2020  996,734  1,897,132  -  -  0  (340,046)  1,945,980  4,499,800
                           
  2019
(a)
                
  187,070  2,532,116  -  376,176  317,791  (63,715)  151,909  3,501,347
                        
                                      
                            
   
2021
  
646,806
  
1,163,712
  
-
  
439,979
  
0
  
463,757
  
784,104
  
3,498,358
D.E. Lyons (b)
Senior vice-president,
finance and
administration, and
controller (since
May 1, 2018)
                           
                  
  2020  689,307  553,128  -  -  0  (207,474)  1,516,702  2,551,663
                           
                  
   2019  665,551  621,696  -  135,344  135,341  (150,729)  545,109  1,952,312
                                      
                            
   
2021
  
545,996
  
714,096
  
-
  
250,449
  
0
  
81,762
  
415,505
  
2,007,808
                           
S.P. Younger (b)
Senior vice-president,
upstream (since
July 1, 2019)
                  
  2020  527,126  393,012  -  -  0  (299,441)  555,097  1,175,794
                           
  
 
2019
(a)
                    ��   
  249,870  674,962  -  79,747  81,927  64,157  385,445  1,536,108
                        
                                      
                            
   
2021
  
450,000
  
749,360
  
-
  
237,332
  
0
  
268,900
  
91,487
  
1,797,079
                                     
B.A. Jolly
                  
Assistant controller
  2020  444,500  393,012  -  -  0  23,300  76,767  937,579
(since August 1, 2019)
                           
                  
   2019  413,333  427,416  -  63,300  75,954  (118,700)  70,093  931,396
                                      
                            
J.R. Wetmore
Vice-president,
downstream and
Western Canada fuels
manager (since
January 1, 2018)
  
2021
  
432,100
  
581,856
  
-
  
157,555
  
0
  
56,200
  
59,028
  
1,286,739
                           
  
 
2020
  427,100  320,232  -  -  0  87,500  50,885  885,717
                           
                  
  2019  405,600  382,084  -  47,000  60,032  184,300  47,073  1,126,089
                                    

172

Table of Contents
Footnotes to the Summary compensation table for named executive officers
(a)
The compensation for B.W. Corson and S.P. Younger for the first year of their assignment has been prorated based on the start of their assignment. Mr. Corson was appointed as president of the company effective September 17, 2019. Mr. Corson’s expatriate assignment from Exxon Mobil Corporation, an affiliate in the U.S., formally started November 1, 2019 reflecting a transition period from his previous role. The company incurred costs related to Mr. Corson’s compensation from November 1, 2019 onwards, and a portion of his compensation between his appointment on September 17 and formal assignment on November 1, for service he provided to the company during this period. Mr. Younger has been on expatriate assignment from Esso Australia Pty Ltd., an affiliate in Australia, since July 1, 2019.
(b)
The compensation for B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons, and S.P. Younger is paid directly by Exxon Mobil Corporation and respective affiliates, with the exception of the compensation related to the vesting of the company’s restricted stock units and dividend equivalents on outstanding restricted stock units. They also receive employee benefits under their respective affiliates’ employee benefit plans, and not under the company’s employee benefit plans. The company reimburses the respective affiliates for applicable compensation paid and employee benefits provided to them. The company does not reimburse Exxon Mobil Corporation for the cost of incentive awards granted by Exxon Mobil Corporation.
(c)
2021 salaries were held at 2020 levels, reflective of market conditions at the time of the decision. The 2019 and 2020 salary increases were granted to all executives including the named executive officers throughout the calendar year rather than being granted on January 1. (b)Salary. The amounts listed in the “Salary” column for each named executive officer on expatriate assignment (B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons and S.P. Younger) are paid in their local currency, but disclosed in Canadian dollars. Mr. Corson’s and Mr. Lyons’ salaries are paid in U.S. dollars and were converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2021 exchange rate of 1.2535. In 2020 and 2019, the average exchange rate was 1.3415 and 1.3269 respectively. Mr. Younger’s salary is paid in Australian dollars and was converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2021 exchange rate 0.9421. In 2020 and 2019, the average exchange rate was 0.9247 and 0.9228. Differences between the 2020 and 2021 salaries are due to the interval of salary increases in 2020 and the variation on the exchange rates.
(d)
The grant date fair value equals the number of restricted stock units multiplied by the closing price of the company’s shares on the date of grant. The closing price of the company’s shares on the grant date in 2021 was $44.08, which is the same as the accounting fair value for the restricted stock units on the date of grant. The closing price of the company’s shares on the grant date in 2020 was $24.26 and in 2019 was $32.38, which is the same as the accounting fair value for the restricted stock units on the date of grant. The company chose this method of valuation as it believes it results in the most accurate representation of fair value.
(e)
The company has not granted stock options since 2002. The stock option plan expired in 2012.
(f)
The amounts listed in the “Annual incentive plans” column for each named executive officer represent their 2021 cash bonus. In 2021, the bonus award was paid in full as a cash bonus in the year of grant rather than a combination of cash and earnings bonus units. In 2020, the company suspended the annual cash bonus program, and therefore no cash payment was made. B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons, and S.P. Younger participate in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s annual cash bonus program, which is similar to the company’s plan, and is paid in U.S. dollars, but disclosed in Canadian dollars. In 2021, Exxon Mobil Corporation’s bonus award was also paid in full as a cash bonus in the year of grant rather than a combination of cash and earnings bonus units. In 2020, Exxon Mobil Corporation’s annual bonus program was also suspended. For amounts paid in 2021 and 2019 in U.S. dollars, they were converted to Canadian dollars at the average exchange rate of 1.2535 and 1.3269 respectively.
(g)
The amounts listed in the “Long-term incentive plans” column represent earnings bonus units related to prior year grants that paid out in year. In 2021 and 2020, the maximum settlement value (trigger) or cumulative earnings per share was not achieved, therefore no payments were made. B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons, and S.P. Younger participate in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s program, which is similar to the company’s program, and is paid in U.S. dollars, but disclosed in Canadian dollars. Under the Exxon Mobil Corporation’s program, the maximum settlement value (trigger) or cumulative earnings per share was not achieved, therefore no payments were made in 2021 and 2020. For amounts paid in 2019 in U.S. dollars, they were converted to Canadian dollars at the average exchange rate of 1.3269.
(h)
“Pension value” is the “Compensatory change” in pensions as of December 31, 2021 as set out in the “Pension plan benefits” table on page 177.
(i)
The amounts listed in the “All other compensation” column include dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units granted, savings plans contributions, expatriate assignment costs, parking and the cost of perquisites including financial planning and business club memberships, as well as security costs and costs associated with participation in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s executive life insurance benefit plan, as applicable. For B.W. Corson and D.E. Lyons, Exxon Mobil Corporation suspended its company contributions to saving plans effective October 1, 2020 and reinstated its company contributions on October 1, 2021.
For each named executive officer on expatriate assignment (B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons and S.P. Younger) are paid in their local currency, but disclosed in Canadian dollars. Mr. Corson’s and Mr. Lyons’ salaries are paid in U.S. dollars and were converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2023 exchange rate of 1.3497. In 2022 and 2021, the average exchange rate was 1.3013 and 1.2535 respectively. Mr. Younger’s salary is paid in Australian dollars and was converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2023 exchange rate 0.8967. In 2022 and 2021, the average exchange rate was 0.9032 and 0.9421 respectively.

178

(c)Share-based awards. The valuation of stock awards in this table represents the grant date fair value, which is equal to the number of restricted stock units multiplied by the closing price of the company’s shares on the date of grant.
Grant DateGrant Price ($)
December 4, 202377.12
December 5, 202272.62
December 6, 202144.08

(d)Option-based awards. The company has not granted stock options since 2002. The stock option plan expired in 2012.

(e)Bonus. The amounts listed in the “Annual incentive plans” column for each named executive officer represent their cash bonus. B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons, and S.P. Younger participate in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s annual cash bonus program, which is similar to the company’s plan, is paid in U.S. dollars, but disclosed in Canadian dollars. For amounts paid in U.S. dollars, they were converted to Canadian dollars at the average exchange rates of 1.3497 for 2023, 1.3013 for 2022, and 1.2535 for 2021.

(f)Long-term incentive plans. The amounts listed in the “Long-term incentive plans” column represent earnings bonus units related to prior year grants that paid out in the year. In 2021, the maximum settlement value (trigger) or cumulative earnings per share was not achieved, therefore no payments were made. B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons, and S.P. Younger participate in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s program, which is similar to the company’s program, is paid in U.S. dollars, but disclosed in Canadian dollars. Under the Exxon Mobil Corporation’s program, the maximum settlement value (trigger) or cumulative earnings per share was not achieved, therefore no payments were made in 2021. Amounts paid in 2022 in U.S. dollars were converted to Canadian dollars at the average exchange rate of 1.3013. As of 2023, there are no outstanding earnings bonus units.

(g)Pension value. “Pension value” is the “compensatory change” in pensions as of December 31, 2023 as set out in the “Pension plan benefits” table on page 184.

(h)All other compensation. The amounts listed in the “All other compensation” column include dividend equivalent payments on restricted stock units granted, savings plans contributions, expatriate assignment costs, parking and perquisites.

Perquisites. Use of perquisites is very limited, composed of financial planning for senior executives, selective use of club memberships primarily for business, and costs associated with participation in Exxon Mobil Corporation's executive life insurance benefit plan, as applicable. In 2023, B.W. Corson received $37,514 of senior executive life insurance premiums, $17,287 for club memberships, and $14,713 for financial planning services. For all other named executive officers, the aggregate value of perquisites received in 20212023 was not greater than $50,000 or 10
percent of the named executive officer’s base salary.
It is noted that in 2021,
Dividend equivalents. In 2023, the actualpaid dividend equivalent paymentsequivalents on the company restricted stock units were $136,068$569,208 for B.W. Corson, $54,960$170,832 for D.E. Lyons, $12,312$92,592 for S.P. Younger, $60,419$136,456 for B.A. Jolly, and $52,245$57,536 for J.R. Wetmore. The dividendS.L. Evers. Dividend equivalent payments on Exxon Mobil Corporation’s restricted stock were $507,904$366,805 for Mr.
B.W. Corson, $85,526$47,682 for Mr.
D.E. Lyons and $112,868$67,550 for Mr.
 Younger; these amounts wereS.P. Younger, paid in U.S. dollars and converted to Canadian dollars at the average 20212023 exchange rate of 1.2535.
1.3497.

Expatriate assignment costs. For the named executive officers on expatriate assignment (B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons and S.P. Younger), “All other compensation” also includes expatriate assignment costs which consist of expatriate allowances and the net effect of tax equalization costs in the year. Tax equalization costs include the net effect of taxes paid by the companies to local taxing authorities on behalf of the named executive officer, offset by a withholding from their income that approximates the amount of tax they would pay if they had not gone on expatriate assignment. Tax equalization is an integral part of the expatriate relocation program and is designed to maintain an individual’s overall tax burden at approximately the same level it would have otherwise been, had they remained in their home country. Tax equalization amounts vary from one year to the next and the net impact may be positive or negative in the year.

(j)
“Total compensation” consists of the total dollar value of “Salary”, “Share-based awards”, “Option-based awards”,
“Non-equity
incentive plan compensation”, “Pension value” and “All other compensation”.
(i)Total compensation. “Total compensation” consists of the total dollar value of “Salary”, “Share-based awards”, “Option-based awards”, “Non-equity incentive plan compensation”, “Pension value” and “All other compensation”. "Total direct compensation" is compensation granted during the year, including salary, current year bonus, and the grant date fair value of restricted stock units.
173
179

Table of Contents
Outstanding share-basedequity awards and option-based awards for named executive officers
The following table sets forth all share-based and option-based awards outstanding for each named executive officer of the company as at December 31, 2021.2023.

 Option-based awardsShare-based awards
Name
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
(#)
Option
exercise
price
($)
Option
expiration
date
Value of
unexercised
in-the-
money
options
($)
Number of
shares or
units of
shares that
have not
vested
(#)
(d)
Market or
payout value
of share-
based awards
that have not
vested
($)
(d)
Market or
 payout value of
vested share-
based awards
not paid out or
distributed
($)
B.W. Corson (a)
410,40030,976,992
D.E. Lyons (b)
114,4008,634,912
S.P. Younger (c)
66,1004,989,228
B.A. Jolly76,3005,759,124
S.L. Evers39,6002,989,008

(a)B.W. Corson was granted restricted stock units from 2019 to 2023 under the company’s plan. With respect to previous years, Mr. Corson participated in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s restricted stock plan, which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan. Under that plan, Mr. Corson held 59,700 Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted valued at $7,894,343 on December 31, 2023, at a closing price for Exxon Mobil Corporation shares on December 31, 2023 of $99.98 U.S., and converted to Canadian dollars at the December 31, 2023 close rate of 1.3226 provided by the Bank of Canada.

(b)D.E. Lyons was granted restricted stock units from 2018 to 2023 under the company’s plan. With respect to previous years, Mr. Lyons participated in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s restricted stock plan, which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan. Under that plan, Mr. Lyons held 4,800 Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock valued at $634,721 on December 31, 2023, at a closing price for Exxon Mobil Corporation shares on December 31, 2023 of $99.98 U.S., and converted to Canadian dollars at the December 31, 2023 close rate of 1.3226 provided by the Bank of Canada.

(c)S.P. Younger was granted restricted stock units from 2020 to 2023 under the company’s plan. With respect to previous years, Mr. Younger participated in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s restricted stock plan, which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan. Under that plan, Mr. Younger held 10,300 Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock valued at $1,362,006 on December 31, 2023, at a closing price for Exxon Mobil Corporation shares on December 31, 2023 of $99.98 U.S., and converted to Canadian dollars at the December 31, 2023 close rate of 1.3226 provided by the Bank of Canada.

(d)Represents the total of the outstanding restricted stock units received from the company plan that have not vested, based on the closing price of the company’s shares on December 31, 2023 of $75.48.
   
Option-based awards
  
Share-based awards
Name
  
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
(#)
  
Option
exercise
price
($)
  
Option
expiration
date
  
Value of
unexercised
in-the-

money
options
($)
  
Number of
shares or
units of
shares that
have not
vested
(#)
(d)
  
Market or
payout value
of share-
based awards
that have not
vested
($)
(d)
  
Market or
    payout value of    
vested share-
based awards
not paid out or
distributed
($)
B.W. Corson
(a)
  -  -  -  -  234,600  10,702,452  -
D.E. Lyons
(b)
  -  -  -  -  78,000  3,558,360  -
S.P. Younger
(c)
  -  -  -  -  32,400  1,478,088  -
B.A. Jolly
  -  -  -  -  68,600  3,129,532  -
J.R. Wetmore
  -  -  -  -  56,900  2,595,778  -
(a)
B.W. Corson was granted restricted stock units from 2019 to 2021 under the company’s plan. With respect to previous years, Mr. Corson participated in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s restricted stock plan, which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan. Under that plan, Mr. Corson held 88,000 Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock whose value on December 31, 2021 was $6,826,748 based on a closing price for Exxon Mobil Corporation shares on December 31, 2021 of $61.19 U.S., which was converted to Canadian dollars at the December 31, 2021 close rate of 1.2678 provided by the Bank of Canada.
(b)
D.E. Lyons was granted restricted stock units from 2018 to 2021 under the company’s plan. With respect to previous years, Mr. Lyons participated in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s restricted stock plan, which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan. Under that plan, Mr. Lyons held 14,400 Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock whose value on December 31, 2021 was $1,117,104 based on a closing price for Exxon Mobil Corporation shares on December 31, 2021 of $61.19 U.S., which was converted to Canadian dollars at the December 31, 2021 close rate of 1.2678 provided by the Bank of Canada.
(c)
S.P. Younger was granted restricted stock units in 2020 and 2021 under the company’s plan. With respect to previous years, Mr. Younger participated in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s restricted stock plan, which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan. Under that plan, Mr. Younger held 19,900 Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock whose value on December 31, 2021 was $1,543,776 based on a closing price for Exxon Mobil Corporation shares on December 31, 2021 of $61.19 U.S., which was converted to Canadian dollars at the December 31, 2021 close rate of 1.2678 provided by the Bank of Canada.
(d)
Represents the total of the outstanding restricted stock units received from the company plan in 2014 through 2021. The value is based on the closing price of the company’s shares on December 31, 2021 of $ 45.62.
174
180

Table of Contents
Incentive plan awards for named executive officers – Value vested or earned during the year
The following table sets forth the value of the incentive plan awards that vested in the year for each named executive officer of the company.

Name
Option-based awards –
Value vested during the
year
($)
Share-based awards – Value
vested during the year
($)
(d)
Non-equity incentive plan
 compensation – Value earned during the year
($)
(e)
B.W. Corson (a)
D.E. Lyons (b)
883,204
S.P. Younger (c)
627,539
B.A. Jolly1,028,709340,583
S.L. Evers402,148294,650
(a)Although B.W. Corson received restricted stock units under the company’s plan from 2019 to 2023, these restricted stock units have not vested. In previous years, Mr. Corson participated in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s restricted stock plan, which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan. In 2023, restrictions were removed on 14,150 Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock having a value of $1,993,858 based on the average of the high and low sale prices of Exxon Mobil Corporation common shares on the NYSE on the date restrictions lapsed. B.W. Corson participates in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s annual bonus program, which is similar to the company’s annual bonus program. In 2023, B.W. Corson received $1,707,371 with respect to the annual cash bonus. All these amounts were paid in U.S. dollars and converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2023 exchange rate of 1.3497.

(b)Prior to 2018, Mr. Lyons participated in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s restricted stock plan, which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan. In 2023, restrictions were removed on 4,800 Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock having a value of $668,231 based on the average of the high and low sale prices of Exxon Mobil Corporation common shares on the NYSE on the date restrictions lapsed. D.E. Lyons participates in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s annual bonus program, which is similar to the company’s annual bonus program. In 2023, D.E. Lyons received $719,390 with respect to the annual cash bonus. All these amounts were paid in U.S. dollars and converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2023 exchange rate of 1.3497.

(c)Prior to 2020, Mr. Younger participated in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s restricted stock plan, which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan. In 2023, restrictions were removed on 3,300 Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock having a value of $459,409 based on the average of the high and low sale prices of Exxon Mobil Corporation common shares on the NYSE on the date restrictions lapsed. S.P. Younger participates in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s annual bonus program, which is similar to the company’s annual bonus program. In 2023, S.P. Younger received $406,935 with respect to the annual cash bonus. All these amounts were paid in U.S. dollars and converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2023 exchange rate of 1.3497.

(d)These values show restricted stock units granted by the company that vested in 2023. The value is based on the five day average closing price of the company’s shares, which includes the vesting date and the four preceding trading days. For D.E. Lyons and S.P. Younger, the values represent restricted stock units granted in 2020. For B.A. Jolly and S.L. Evers, the values represent restricted stock units granted in 2016 and 2020, which vested in 2023.

(e)This column represents amounts paid by the company with respect to the annual cash bonus.

Name
  
Option-based awards –
Value vested during the
year
($)
 
Share-based awards – Value
vested during the year
($)
(d)
 
Non-equity incentive plan
  compensation – Value earned  
during the year
($)
(e)
B.W. Corson
(a)
  - - -
D.E. Lyons
(b)
  - 411,322 -
S.P. Younger
(c)
  - - -
B.A. Jolly
  - 494,871 237,332
J.R. Wetmore
  - 434,887 157,555
(a)
Although B.W. Corson received restricted stock units under the company’s plan from 2019 to 2021, these restricted stock units have not vested. In previous years, Mr. Corson participated in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s restricted stock plan, which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan. In 2021, restrictions were removed on 28,100 Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock having a value as at December 31, 2021 of $2,179,905 based on the closing price of Exxon Mobil Corporation common shares of $61.19 U.S., which was converted to Canadian dollars at the December 31, 2021 close rate of 1.2678 provided by the Bank of Canada. B.W. Corson participates in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s annual bonus program, which is similar to the company’s annual bonus program. In 2021, B.W. Corson received $956,421 with respect to the annual cash bonus, which was paid in U.S. dollars and converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2021 exchange rate of 1.2535. The maximum settlement value (trigger) or cumulative earnings per share was not achieved for earnings bonus units granted in prior years, and therefore no earnings bonus unit payments were made.
(b)
Although D.E. Lyons received restricted stock units under the company’s plan from 2018 to 2021, these restricted stock units have not vested. In previous years, Mr. Lyons participated in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s restricted stock plan, which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan. In 2021, restrictions were removed on 5,150 Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock having a value as at December 31, 2021 of $399,520 based on the closing price of Exxon Mobil Corporation common shares of $61.19 U.S., which was converted to Canadian dollars at the December 31, 2021 close rate of 1.2678 provided by the Bank of Canada. D.E. Lyons participates in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s annual bonus program, which is similar to the company’s annual bonus program. In 2021, D.E. Lyons received $439,979 with respect to the annual cash bonus, which was paid in U.S. dollars and converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2021 exchange rate of 1.2535. The maximum settlement value (trigger) or cumulative earnings per share was not achieved for earnings bonus units granted in prior years, and therefore no earnings bonus unit payments were made.
(c)
Although S.P. Younger received restricted stock units under the company’s plan in 2020 and 2021, these restricted stock units have not vested. In previous years, Mr. Younger participated in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s restricted stock plan, which is similar to the company’s restricted stock unit plan. In 2021, restrictions were removed on 5,900 Exxon Mobil Corporation restricted stock having a value as at December 31, 2021 of $457,702 based on the closing price of Exxon Mobil Corporation common shares of $61.19 U.S., which was converted to Canadian dollars at the December 31, 2021 close rate of 1.2678 provided by the Bank of Canada. S.P. Younger participates in Exxon Mobil Corporation’s annual bonus program, which is similar to the company’s annual bonus program. In 2021, S.P. Younger received $250,449 with respect to the annual cash bonus, which was paid in U.S. dollars and converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2021 exchange rate of 1.2535. The maximum settlement value (trigger) or cumulative earnings per share was not achieved for earnings bonus units granted in prior years, and therefore no earnings bonus unit payments were made.
(d)
These values show restricted stock units granted by the company that vested in 2021. The value is based on the five day average closing price of the company’s shares, which includes the vesting date and the four preceding trading days. For D.E. Lyons, the values represent restricted stock units granted in 2018. For B.A. Jolly and J.R. Wetmore, the values represent restricted stock units granted in 2014 and 2018, which vested in 2021.
(e)
This column represents amounts paid by the company with respect to the annual cash bonus and earnings bonus units granted in prior years that paid out in the current year. In 2021, the company granted an annual cash bonus. The maximum settlement value (trigger) or cumulative earnings per share was not achieved for earnings bonus units granted in prior years, and therefore no earnings bonus unit payments were made.
175
181

Table of Contents
Equity compensation plan information
The information shown in the following table provides information onrepresents the common shares of the company that may be issued as of the end of 20212023 pursuant to compensation plans of the company.

Plan categoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(#)
(c)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
($)
 Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column)
(#)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (a)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (b)1,500,3708,967,667
Total1,500,3708,967,667
(a)The company’s stock option plan expired in 2012.

Plan category
  
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(#)
(c)
 
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
($)
 
  Number of securities remaining  
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in the first column)
(#)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (a)
  - - -
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (b)
  1,743,315 - 8,724,347
Total
  1,743,315 - 8,724,347
(b)This is a restricted stock unit plan, which is described starting on page 164.

(c)The Number of securities to be issued represents the total number of restricted stock units still outstanding (3,913,310) minus the outstanding restricted stock units that are only eligible for cash (and not common shares) upon vesting (2,412,940). The Number of securities remaining available for future issuance represents the restricted stock units not yet granted (6,554,727) plus the number of outstanding restricted stock units that are only eligible for cash (and not common shares) upon vesting (2,412,940).
(a)
The company’s stock option plan expired in 2012.
(b)
This is a restricted stock unit plan, which is described starting on page 163.
(c)
The Number of securities to be issued represents the total number of restricted stock units issued since 2011 and still outstanding (3,950,615) minus the outstanding restricted stock units that are only eligible for cash (and not common shares) upon vesting (2,207,300). The Number of securities remaining available for future issuance represents the restricted stock units not yet granted (6,517,047) plus the number of outstanding restricted stock units that are only eligible for cash (and not common shares) upon vesting (2,207,300).
Restricted stock unitsRSUs as a percentage of outstanding shares
The following table provides information on the restricted stock unit plan, expressed as a number and as a percentage of the common shares of the company as of the end of 2021.2023.

 Maximum number of
restricted stock units
issuable under the plan
(b)
Total number of
restricted stock units
awarded and
outstanding
Total number of restricted
 stock units available for grant
Number (#)10,468,0373,913,3106,554,727
Percent of outstanding common shares (%) (a)1.950.731.22
(a)As of December 31, 2023, the number of common shares outstanding was 535,836,803.

(b)The maximum number of restricted stock units issuable under the company plan is the number as of December 31, 2022 (10,468,037) minus the common shares issued in 2023 pursuant to the vesting of restricted stock units under the plan (0 common shares).






    
Maximum number of
restricted stock units
issuable under the plan
(#)
(b)
 
Total number of
restricted stock units
awarded and
outstanding
(#)
 
Total number of restricted
    stock units available for grant    
(#)
Number
  10,468,037 3,950,615 6,517,422
Percent of outstanding common shares (a)
  1.54% 0.58% 0.96%
(a)
As of December 31, 2021, the number of common shares outstanding was 678,079,864.
(b)
The maximum number of restricted stock units issuable under the company plan is the number as of December 31, 2020 (10,474,762) minus the common shares issued in 2021 pursuant to the vesting of restricted stock units under the plan (6,725 common shares).
176
182

Table of Contents
Annual burn rate
The following table provides the annual burn rate associated with the restricted stock unit plan for each of the company’s three most recent fiscal years. The annual burn rate is the number of restricted stock units granted as a percentage of the weighted averageweighted-average number of outstanding shares of the company, which provides a measure of how quickly a company is using its available shares for incentive purposes.

 
Number of restricted
stock units granted
under the plan
(#)
(a)
Weighted-average
number of securities
outstanding
(#)
(b)
 Annual burn rate
(%)
(c)
2023949,520574,750,5750.17
2022884,140640,160,0280.14
2021680,720711,602,1500.10
(a)The number of restricted stock units granted under the plan in the applicable fiscal year.

    
Number of restricted
stock units granted
under the plan
(#)
(a)
  
Weighted average
number of securities
outstanding
(#)
(b)
  
    Annual burn rate    
(%)
(c)
2021
  680,720  711,602,150  0.10%
2020
  747,040  735,285,422  0.10%
2019
  854,800  762,680,114  0.11%
(b)The weighted-average number of securities outstanding during the period is the number of securities outstanding at the beginning of the period, adjusted by the number of securities bought back or issued during the period multiplied by a time-weighting factor.

(c)The annual burn rate percent is calculated as the number of restricted stock units granted under the plan divided by the weighted-average number of securities outstanding.

(a)
The number of restricted stock units granted under the plan in the applicable fiscal year.
(b)
The weighted average number of securities outstanding during the period is the number of securities outstanding at the beginning of the period, adjusted by the number of securities bought back or issued during the period multiplied by a time-weighting factor.
(c)
The annual burn rate percent is calculated as the number of restricted stock units granted under the plan divided by the weighted average number of securities outstanding.
Status of prior long-term incentive compensation plans
The company’s only long-term incentive compensation plan is the restricted stock unit plan described starting on page 163.164. There are no units outstanding for any historical plan.
183

Pension plan benefits
The following table provides information for each named executive officer of the company participating in a defined benefit pension plan. Information for named executive officers on assignment from affiliates of the company who participate in a plan provided by such affiliates is disclosed in the footnotes.
Name
Number
of years
credited
service
(as of
December 31, 2023)
(#)
(a)
 
Annual benefits
payable
($)
Opening
present
value of
defined
benefit
obligation
($)
(d)
Compensatory
change
($)
(e)
Non-
compensatory
change
($)
(f)
Closing
present
value of
defined
benefit
 obligation
($)
(d)
At year-
end
(b)
At age
65
(c)
B.W. Corson
D.E. Lyons
S.P. Younger (g)
B.A. Jolly32.5393,700503,2005,864,5001,060,00080,7007,005,200
S.L. Evers25.7136,000254,8001,129,100427,300180,2001,736,600

(a)B.W. Corson and D.E. Lyons participate in the Exxon Mobil Corporation defined benefit pension plan including tax-qualified and non-qualified plans. Benefits under this plan are payable in U.S. dollars and have been converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2023 exchange rate of 1.3497. Under this plan, Mr. Corson had 40.5 years of credited service and Mr. Lyons had 33.5 years of credited service. S.P. Younger participates in the Esso Australia Pty Ltd. defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans. Benefits under these plans are payable in Australian dollars and have been converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2023 exchange rate of 0.8967. Under these plans, Mr. Younger had 26.8 years of credited service.

(b)For members of the company’s pension plan, the annual benefits include the amount of the accrued annual lifetime pension from the company’s registered pension plan and supplemental pension arrangement. Benefits under the supplemental pension arrangement can be paid as a lump-sum equivalent upon retirement. For members of the Exxon Mobil Corporation’s pension plan, the annual benefits include the accrued annual lifetime pension from the tax-qualified and the annual amount calculated under the non-qualified plans. For B.W. Corson this value was $1,787,211. For D.E. Lyons this value was $749,962. Non-qualified plan benefits are payable only as a lump-sum equivalent upon retirement. For members of the Esso Australia Pty Ltd.defined benefit plan, benefits are payable as lump-sum equivalent or annual lifetime pension upon retirement for participants age 55 and older. For S.P Younger, this is not applicable as his age is under 55 years, and therefore he is not currently entitled to pension if leaving service.

(c)For members of the company’s pension plan, the annual benefits include the amount of the accrued annual lifetime pension from the company’s registered pension plan and supplemental pension arrangement that would be earned to age 65 assuming final average earnings as at December 31, 2023. Benefits under the supplemental pension arrangement can be paid as a lump-sum equivalent upon retirement. For members of the Exxon Mobil Corporation’s pension plan, the annual benefits include the annual lifetime pension from the tax-qualified and the annual amount calculated under the non-qualified plans that would be earned to age 65 assuming final average earnings as at December 31, 2023. For B.W. Corson, this value was $1,913,621. For D.E. Lyons, this value was $834,292. Non-qualified plan benefits are payable only as a lump-sum equivalent upon retirement. For members of the Esso Australia Pty. Ltd. defined benefit plan, benefits are payable as an annual lifetime pension or a lump-sum equivalent upon retirement or a combination of both, as elected by the participant upon leaving service. For S.P. Younger, the annual lifetime pension that would be earned to age 65, assuming final average earnings as of December 31, 2023 was $379,975.

(d)For members of the company’s pension plan, the opening and closing defined benefit obligation is defined under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and values are calculated on a basis that is consistent with the valuation that was performed for accounting purposes for the company’s plans. The value is calculated based on estimated earnings eligible for pension as described previously and Yearly Maximum Pensionable Earnings (YMPE) as defined by the Canada Revenue Agency, projected to retirement and pro-rated on service to the date of valuation. The calculations assume that the Canada Pension Plan offset is based on the annual maximum benefit at retirement and the Old Age Security (OAS) offset is based on the OAS benefit at the date of valuation, projected to retirement, as applicable. For members of the Exxon Mobil Corporation and Esso Australia Pty Ltd. pension plan respectively, the opening and closing defined benefit obligation is defined under GAAP and values are consistent with the valuation performed for accounting purposes for the applicable affiliate plan. The values are calculated based on estimated earnings eligible for pension as described previously. For B.W. Corson, the opening value was $17,292,939 and the closing value was $19,928,162. For D.E. Lyons the opening value was $7,585,952 and the closing value was $8,517,413. For S.P. Younger, the opening value was $2,574,182 and the closing value was $3,160,518.
184

(e)The value for “Compensatory change” includes service cost for 2023 and the impact of change in earnings on the projected benefit obligation. For members of the company’s plan, these values are calculated using the individual’s additional pensionable service in 2023 and the actual salary and bonus received in 2023. For members of the Exxon Mobil Corporation and Esso Australia Pty Ltd. pension plans, these values are calculated using the individual’s additional pensionable service in 2023 and earnings as described previously. For B.W. Corson, this value was $2,461,764. For D.E. Lyons, this value was $850,549. For S.P. Younger, this value was $59,505.

(f)The value for “Non-compensatory change” includes the impact of experience not related to earnings, benefit payments and change in measurement assumptions. With respect to the company’s pension plan, the discount rate used to determine the closing present value of defined benefit obligation at the end of 2023 decreased to 4.6 percent, from 5.1 percent at the end of 2022, which had a positive impact on the non-compensatory change element. For members of Exxon Mobil Corporation and Esso Australia Pty Ltd., the value for “Non-compensatory change” includes the impact of experience not related to earnings or service. For Exxon Mobil Corporation’s plan, this includes the effect of interest based on a discount rate of 5.3 percent at the end of 2023, down from 5.6 percent at the end of 2022. For the Esso Australia Pty Ltd. Plan, this includes the effect of interest based on a discount rate of 5.0 percent at the end of 2023, down from 6.2 percent at the end of 2022. For B.W. Corson, this value was $173,459. For D.E. Lyons, this value was $80,912. For S.P. Younger, this value was $526,831.

(g)S.P. Younger participates in the Esso Australia Pty Ltd. defined contribution plan. Contribution limits under this plan have been reached. The “Accumulated value at start of year” was $42,409, the “Compensatory value” was 5,631 reflecting affiliate contribution and investment earnings, and the “Accumulated value at year-end” was $48,040.
Pension plan
B.A. Jolly participates in the 1.6 percent provision, and S.L. Evers participates in the three pension option (3PO) provision of the company's pension plan. Key features of the plan provisions for these executives include:
Pension planSupplemental pension arrangement (SPA)
TypeRegisteredNon-registered
1.6% provision calculation
An annual benefit equal to 1.6 percent multiplied by final average earnings(a) multiplied by years of service, with a partial offset for applicable government pension benefits.
An option to forego a portion of the company's matching contributions to the savings plan in order to receive an additional 0.4 percent of final average earnings.
Includes any portions of the defined pension benefit that cannot be paid from the registered plan due to income tax regulations.
Executive officers who receive an annual bonus, and meet the criteria of the SPA, can also receive an annual benefit of 1.6% of final average bonus earnings(b) multiplied by years of service.
3PO provision calculation
An annual benefit equal to 1.0, 1.5 or 2.0 percent multiplied by final average earnings(a) multiplied by years of service.
Employees may elect to change the pension percent multiplier once every five years. Company contributions to the savings plan are integrated with the pension multiplier election.(c)
Includes any portions of the defined pension benefit that cannot be paid from the registered plan due to income tax regulations.
Executive officers who receive an annual bonus, and meet the criteria of the SPA, can also receive an annual benefit of 1.5% of final average bonus earnings(b) multiplied by years of service.
Form of paymentBenefit available in various annuity forms upon retirement.
May be taken as a lump sum or an annuity upon retirement.

(a) Final average earnings consist of base salary over the highest 36 consecutive months in the 10 years of service prior to retirement.

(b) Final average bonus earnings include the average of the annual bonus for the three highest grants of the last five bonus years awarded prior to retirement for eligible executives.

(c) For the 3PO provision, the company contribution to the savings plan is integrated with the pension multiplier election as follows:
Pension multiplierCompany savings plan match
1.5%Up to 6%
1.0%Up to 6% and an additional company contribution of 2%
2.0%Forego company matching contribution




185
Name
  
Number of
years
credited
service
(as
of
December 31,
2021)
(#)
(a)
  
 
Annual benefits
payable
($)
  
Opening
present
value of
defined
benefit
obligation
($)
(d)
  
Compensatory
change
($)
(e)
  
Non-
compensatory
change
($)
(f)
 
Closing
present
value of
defined
benefit
    obligation    
($)
(d)
  
At year-
end
(b)
  
At age
65
(c)
B.W. Corson
  -  -  -  -  -  - -
D.E. Lyons
  -  -  -  -  -  - -
S.P. Younger
(g)
  -  -  -  -  -  - -
B.A. Jolly
  30.5  267,700  364,600  5,546,900  268,900  (68,300) 5,747,500
J.R. Wetmore
  27.5  239,200  394,100  5,092,200  56,200  (111,500) 5,036,900

B.W. Corson, D.E. Lyons and S.P. Younger are not participants in the company’s pension plan, but are participants in the Exxon Mobil Corporation or respective affiliates’ pension and savings plans:
Mr. Corson and Mr. Lyons participate in the Exxon Mobil Pension Plan (EMPP). Under this plan, the pension is payable in U.S. dollars and is calculated based on final average base salary over the highest 36 consecutive months in the 10 years of service prior to retirement. They are also eligible for the ExxonMobil Supplemental Pension Plan (SPP) for pension benefits that cannot be paid from the EMPP due to IRS limitations. The ExxonMobil Additional Payment Plan (APP) provides a pension based on the average annual bonus for the three highest grants of the last five awarded prior to retirement. The SPP and APP are paid as a lump sum.
Mr. Younger participates in the Esso Australia Pty Ltd. defined benefit plan. Under this plan, the pension is payable in Australian dollars and is calculated based on final average base salary over the highest 12 consecutive months in the 10 years of service prior to retirement.

Effect of early retirement or death
All company pension provisions require completion of 10 years of service and attainment of age 55 to be eligible for early retirement.
The early retirement benefit under the 1.6 percent pension plan provision consists of an annuity benefit that is undiscounted for retirement ages of 60 years or over, with a discount of 5 percent for each year under age 60. Alternatively, pension will be undiscounted if member attains age 55 and 30 years of service.
The early retirement benefit under the 3PO pension provision consists of an annuity benefit that is undiscounted for retirement ages of 62 years or over, with a discount of 5 percent for each year under age 57 and a discount of 3 percent for each year between age 57 and 62.

In the event of death after pension commencement, a retirement benefit may be payable to the participant’s beneficiary, in accordance with pension selection.



























177
186

Table of Contents
Other compensation elements
Footnotes to

Termination and change-in-control
The company does not have written employment contracts or any other agreement with its named executive officers providing for payments on change-in-control or termination of employment; see page 174.

Common programs
All executives employed by the company, including the Pension plan benefits table for named executive officers,
(a)
B.W. Corson and D.E. Lyons participate in the Exxon Mobil Corporation defined benefit pension plan including
tax-qualified
and
non-qualified
plans. Benefits under this plan are payable in U.S. dollarscommon programs (the same salary, incentive, and have been converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2021 exchange rate of 1.2535. Under this plan, Mr. Corson had 38.5 years of credited serviceretirement programs). Compensation is differentiated based on individual performance assessment, experience and Mr. Lyons had 31.5 years of credited service. S.P. Younger participates in the Esso Australia Pty Ltd. defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans. Benefits under these plans are payable in Australian dollars and have been converted to Canadian dollars at the average 2021 exchange rate of 0.9421. Under these plans, Mr. Younger had 24.8 years of credited service.pay grade.
(b)
For membersAll executives on assignment from an affiliate of the company’s pension plan,company, including the annual benefits include the amount of the accrued annual lifetime pensionnamed executive officers on assignment from the company’s registered pension plan and supplemental pension arrangement. Benefits under the supplemental pension arrangement can be paid as a
lump-sum
equivalent upon retirement. For members of the Exxon Mobil Corporation’s pension plan, the annual benefits include the accrued annual lifetime pension from the
tax-qualified
and the annual amount calculated under the
non-qualified
plans. For B.W. Corson, this value was $1,044,457. For D.E. Lyons, this value was $477,008.
Non-qualified
plan benefits are payable only as a
lump-sum
equivalent upon retirement. For members of the Esso Australia Pty Ltd. defined benefit plan, benefits are payable as
lump-sum
equivalent or annual lifetime pension upon retirement for participants age 55 and older. For S.P. Younger, this is not applicable as his age is under 55 years, and therefore he is not currently entitled to pension if leaving service.
(c)
For members of the company’s pension plan, the annual benefits include the amount of the accrued annual lifetime pension from the company’s registered pension plan and supplemental pension arrangement that would be earned to age 65 assuming final average earnings as at December 31, 2021. Benefits under the supplemental pension arrangement can be paid as a
lump-sum
equivalent upon retirement. For members of the Exxon Mobil Corporation’s pension plan, the annual benefits include the annual lifetime pension from the
tax-qualified
and the annual amount calculated under the
non-qualified
plans that would be earned to age 65 assuming final average earnings as at December 31, 2021. For B.W. Corson, this value was $1,177,635. For D.E. Lyons, this value was $565,710.
Non-qualified
plan benefits are payable only as a
lump-sum
equivalent upon retirement. For members of the Esso Australia Pty. Ltd. defined benefit plan, benefits are payable as an annual lifetime pension or a
lump-sum
equivalent upon retirement or a combination of both, as elected by the participant upon leaving service. For S.P. Younger, the
lump-sum
value that would be earned to age 65, assuming final average earnings as of December 31, 2021 was $354,950.
(d)
For members of the company’s pension plan, the opening and closing defined benefit obligation is defined under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and values are calculated on a basis that is consistent with the valuation that was performed for accounting purposes for the company’s plans. The value is calculated based on estimated earnings eligible for pension as described previously and Yearly Maximum Pensionable Earnings (YMPE) as defined by the Canada Revenue Agency, projected to retirement and
pro-rated
on service to the date of valuation. The calculations assume that the Canada Pension Plan offset is based on the annual maximum benefit at retirement and the Old Age Security (OAS) offset is based on the OAS benefit at the date of valuation, projected to retirement. For members of the Exxon Mobil Corporation and Esso Australia Pty Ltd. pension plan respectively, the opening and closing defined benefit obligation is defined under GAAP and values are consistent with the valuation performed for accounting purposes for the applicable affiliate plan. The values are calculated based on estimated earnings eligible for pension as described previously. For B.W. Corson, the opening value was $12,805,868 and the closing value was $15,421,128. For D.E. Lyons, the opening value was $5,991,390 and the closing value was $7,186,059. For S.P. Younger, the opening value was $3,231,521 and the closing value was $3,109,701.
(e)
The value for “Compensatory change” includes service cost for 2021 and the impact of change in earnings on the projected benefit obligation. For members of the company’s plan, these values are calculated using the individual’s additional pensionable service in 2021 and the actual salary and bonus received in 2021. For members of the Exxon Mobil Corporation and Esso Australia Pty Ltd. pension plans, these values are calculated using the individual’s additional pensionable service in 2021 and earnings as described previously. For B.W. Corson, this value was ($1,200,091). For D.E. Lyons, this value was ($463,757). For S.P. Younger, this value was ($74,865).
(f)
The value for
“Non-compensatory
change” includes the impact of experience not related to earnings, benefit payments and change in measurement assumptions. With respect to the company’s pension plan, the discount rate used to determine the closing present value of defined benefit obligation at the end of 2021 increased to 3.0 percent, from 2.5 percent at the end of 2020, which had a negative impact on the
non-compensatory
change element. For members of the Exxon Mobil Corporation and Esso Australia Pty Ltd., the value for
“Non-compensatory
change” includes the impact of experience not related to earnings or service. For thealso participate in common programs that are administered by Exxon Mobil Corporation’sCorporation or such affiliates. The named executive officers on assignment receive restricted stock units from Imperial.
The executive resources committee (“committee”) reviews and approves annual compensation recommendations for each named executive officer prior to implementation.

Health care benefits
Named executive officers are eligible to participate in their respective Company’s health care programs (medical, dental, prescription drug, and vision care) on the same basis as other employees; no special provisions apply.

Tax assistance
Tax assistance is provided for employees on expatriate assignment. This assistance consists primarily of a tax equalization component designed to maintain the employees’ overall income tax burden at approximately the same level had they remained in their home country. The expatriate relocation program is broad-based and applies to all executive, management, professional and technical transferred employees.

Payments in the event of death
The only event that results in acceleration of the vesting for outstanding restricted stock awards is death.
Executive’s estate or beneficiaries would be entitled to receive the applicable death benefits as described on page 186, a distribution of the executive’s savings plan this includes the effectbalances, and payment of interest based on a discount rate of 3.0 percent at the end of 2021, up from 2.8 percent at the end of 2020. For the Esso Australia Pty Ltd. Plan, this includes the effect of interest based on a discount rate of 3.0 percent at the end of 2021, up from 2.1 percent at the end of 2020. For B.W. Corson, this value was $1,415,169. For D.E. Lyons, this value was $730,912. For S.P. Younger, this value was ($196,685).
company-provided life insurance.
(g)
S.P. Younger participates in the Esso Australia Pty Ltd. defined contribution plan. Contribution limits under this plan have been reached. The “Accumulated value at start of year” was $40,983, the “Compensatory value” was $6,897 reflecting affiliate contribution and investment earnings, and the “Accumulated value at
year-end”
was $47,880.
178
187


Appendix A – Board of director and committee charters

Board of Directors Charter

The structure, process and responsibilities of the board of directors of the corporation shall include the following items and matters:

1. Responsibility
The board of directors shall be responsible for the stewardship of the corporation.
corporation and provide oversight of management of the corporation, aimed at giving effect to the corporation’s strategy and sustainably generating long-term value.

2. Duty of care
The directors, in exercising their powers and discharging their duties, shall:
(a)     act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the corporation; and
(a)
act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the corporation; and
(b)     exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances.

(b)
exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances.
3. Stewardship process
In order to carry out their responsibility for stewardship within their duty of care, the directors shall, directly or through one or more committees of directors,
(a)    contribute to the formulation of and approve strategic plans on at least an annual basis;
(b)    identify the principal risks of the corporation's business where identifiable and oversee the implementation of appropriate systems to manage such risks;
(c)    provide oversight regarding succession planning for senior management, including the appointing, training and monitoring thereof;
(d)    approve the corporate disclosure guidelines and monitor the external communications of the corporation;
(e)    provide oversight regarding the integrity of the corporation's internal control and management information systems;
(f)    provide oversight regarding the integrity of the corporation's information technology and systems to ensure the security and integrity of the corporation’s electronic information, systems and assets;
(g)    consider management's recommendations regarding major corporation decisions and actions, which have significant societal implications;
(h)    provide oversight regarding compliance with major corporate policies;
(i)    charge the chief executive officer of the corporation with the general management and direction of the business and affairs of the corporation;
(j)    monitor and assess the performance of the chief executive officer;
(k)    satisfy itself as to the integrity of the chief executive officer and other executive officers and ensure that the chief executive officer and the other executive officers create a culture of integrity throughout the company;
(l)    annually review and approve the corporation's code of ethics and business conduct;
(m)    provide oversight regarding compliance with the code of ethics and business conduct, provided that any waivers from the code that are granted for the benefit of the issuer's directors or executive officers should be granted by the board only;
(n)    determine appropriate measures are in place for receiving feedback from stakeholders;
(o)    annually determine the recommended candidates to stand for election as directors of the corporation, and to make appointments of directors to the board to fill open seats between annual meetings, including vacancies created by an increase in the authorized number of directors;    
188
(a)
contribute to the formulation of and approve strategic plans on at least an annual basis;
(b)
identify the principal risks of the corporation’s business where identifiable and oversee the implementation of appropriate systems to manage such risks;
(c)
oversee succession planning for senior management, including the appointing, training and monitoring thereof;
(d)
approve the corporate disclosure guidelines and monitor the external communications of the corporation;
(e)
monitor the integrity of the corporation’s internal control and management information systems;
(f)
monitor the integrity of the corporation’s information technology and systems to ensure the security and integrity of the corporation’s electronic information, systems and assets;
(g)
consider management’s recommendations regarding major corporation decisions and actions, which have significant societal implications;
(h)
monitor compliance with major corporate policies;
(i)
charge the chief executive officer of the corporation with the general management and direction of the business and affairs of the corporation;
(j)
monitor the performance of the chief executive officer;
(k)
satisfy itself as to the integrity of the chief executive officer and other executive officers and ensure that the chief executive officer and the other executive officers create a culture of integrity throughout the company;
(l)
annually review and approve the corporation’s code of ethics and business conduct;
(m)
monitor compliance with the code of ethics and business conduct, provided that any waivers from the code that are granted for the benefit of the issuer’s directors or executive officers should be granted by the board only;
(n)
determine appropriate measures are in place for receiving feedback from stakeholders;
179
(p)    annually review and approve the remuneration of independent directors;

Table(q)    by appropriate charter resolutions, establish the audit, executive resources, nominations and corporate governance, safety and sustainability, and finance committees of Contentsthe board with specific duties defined and the corporation provide each board committee with sufficient funds to discharge its responsibilities in accordance with its charter;
(o)
by appropriate charter resolutions, establish the audit, executive resources, nominations and corporate governance, public policy and corporate responsibility and community collaboration and engagement committees of the board with specific duties defined and the corporation provide each board committee with sufficient funds to discharge its responsibilities in accordance with its charter;
(r)     determine membership of each committee, including its chair and vice-chair, after receiving the recommendation of the nominations and corporate governance committee;
(p)
determine membership of each committee, including its chair and vice-chair, after receiving the recommendation of the nominations and corporate governance committee;
(s)    direct the distribution to the board by management of information that will enhance their familiarity with the corporation's activities and the environment in which it operates, as set out in section 5;
(q)
direct the distribution to the board by management of information that will enhance their familiarity with the corporation’s activities and the environment in which it operates, as set out in section 5;
(t)    review the corporation’s process in respect of employee conflicts of interest and directorships in non-affiliated commercial, financial and industrial organizations and the disclosures thereof;
(r)
review the corporation’s process in respect of employee conflicts of interest(u)    review the mandates of the board and of the committees and their effectiveness at least annually; and directorships in
non-affiliated
commercial, financial and industrial organizations and the disclosures thereof;
(s)
review the mandates of the board and of the committees and their effectiveness at least annually; and
(v)    undertake such additional activities within the scope of its responsibilities as it may deem appropriate.

(t)
undertake such additional activities within the scope of its responsibilities as it may deem appropriate.
4. Range of items to be considered by the board
The following categories and specific items shall be referred to the board for information or decision on a regularly scheduled basis, to the extent appropriate:

Organization/legal
·
fixing of the number of directors
·
director appointments to fill interim vacancies
·
director slate for election by the shareholders
·
officer appointments
·
board governance processes
·
by-laws
and administrative resolutions
·
changes in fundamental structure of the corporation
·
shareholder meeting notice and materials
·
non-employee
director compensation
·
policies adopted by the board
·
investigations and litigation of a material nature
fixing of the number of directors
Financial
·
equity or debt financing
·
dividend declarations
·
financial statements and the related management discussion and analysis, annual and quarterly
·
status of the corporation’s retirement plan and employee savings plan
director appointments to fill interim vacancies
director slate for election by the shareholders
officer appointments
board governance processes
by-laws and administrative resolutions
changes in fundamental structure of the corporation
shareholder meeting notice and materials
non-employee director compensation
policies adopted by the board
investigations and litigation of a material nature

Financial
equity or debt financing
dividend declarations
financial statements and the related management discussion and analysis, annual and quarterly
status of the corporation's retirement plan and employee savings plan

Strategic/investment/operating plans/performance
·
near-term and long-range outlooks
·
capital, lease, loan and contributions budgets annually
·
budget additions over $250 million individually
·
quarterly updates of actual and projected capital expenditures
·
capital expenditures or dispositions in excess of $250 million individually
·
entering into any venture that is outside of the corporation’s existing businesses
·
financial and operating results quarterly
·
Canadian and world economic outlooks
·
regional socio-economic reviews
·
corporate reputation reviews
·
risk management reviews
·
environment and sustainability reviews
·
personnel and process safety systems and performance reviews
·
information technology, systems and cybersecurity
near-term and long-range outlooks
capital, lease, loan and contributions budgets annually
180
budget additions over $250 million individually

Tablequarterly updates of Contentsactual and projected capital expenditures
capital expenditures or dispositions in excess of $250 million individually
entering into any venture that is outside of the corporation's existing businesses
financial and operating results quarterly
Canadian and world economic outlooks
regional socio-economic reviews
corporate reputation reviews
risk management reviews
environment and sustainability reviews
personnel and process safety systems and performance reviews
information technology, systems and cybersecurity

In addition to the items which are specific to the categories identified above, the chief executive officer shall refer to the board for information or decision all other items of corporate significance; and any member of the board may request a review of any such item. Items to be referred to the committees of the board are specified in their respective charters.

189

5. Information to be received by the board
Material shall be distributed to directors through the office of the corporate secretary. Corporate policies, board calendars, contact information and other company processes, are updated on the board portal site and accessible to all directors.
Material under the following general headings, including the specific items listed below and only other similar items, shall be distributed to directors on a regular basis:

Organization/legal
articles of incorporation,
by-laws
and administrative resolutions
corporate policies
corporate data
board and management processes
financial and operating report
organization outline

Social/political/economic environment
��
public issues updates
public issues updates
economic outlook
external communications packages
information technology, systems and cybersecurity updates

Major announcements
press releases
speeches by management
organization changes

Communications to shareholders

Other significant submissions, studies and reports

6. Meetings of the board
(a)    The board normally holds seven (7) regular meetings per year. Additional meetings may be scheduled as required to consider the range of items charged for consideration by the board.
(a)
The board normally holds seven (7) regular meetings per year. Additional meetings may be scheduled as required to consider the range of items charged for consideration by the board.
(b)    An agenda for each board meeting and briefing materials will, to the extent practicable in light of the timing of matters that require board attention, be distributed to each director approximately five to seven days prior to each meeting. The chairman, in consultation with the lead director will normally set the agenda for board meetings. Any director may request the inclusion of specific items.
(b)
An agenda for each board meeting and briefing materials will, to the extent practicable in light of the timing of matters that require board attention, be distributed to each director approximately five to seven days prior to each meeting. The chairman, in consultation with the chair of the executive sessions will normally set the agenda for board meetings. Any director may request the inclusion of specific items.
(c)    It is expected that each director will make every effort to attend each board meeting and each meeting of any committee on which he or she serves. Attendance in person is preferred but virtual attendance is permitted if necessary.
(c)
It is expected that each director will make every effort to attend each board meeting and each meeting of any committee on which he or she serves. Attendance in person is preferred but attendance by teleconference is permitted if necessary.
(d)    Each director should be familiar with the agenda for each meeting, have carefully reviewed all other materials distributed in advance of the meeting, and be prepared to participate meaningfully in the meeting, and to discuss all scheduled items of business.
(d)
Each director should be familiar with the agenda for each meeting, have carefully reviewed all other materials distributed in advance of the meeting, and be prepared to participate meaningfully in the meeting, and to discuss all scheduled items of business.
(e)    The proceedings and deliberations of the board and its committees are confidential. Each director will maintain the confidentiality of information received in connection with his or her service as a director, and the chief executive officer, or those whom he or she has designated, will speak for the corporation.

(e)
The proceedings and deliberations of the board and its committees are confidential. Each director will maintain the confidentiality of information received in connection with his or her service as a director, and the chief executive officer, or those whom he or she has designated, will speak for the corporation.
181

7. Independent directors
(a)    The board shall be composed of a majority of independent directors. The board may also include one or more directors who are not independent, but who, as officers of the majority shareholder, may be viewed as independent of the company’s management.
(a)
The board shall be composed of a majority of independent directors. The board may also include one or more directors who are not independent, but who, as officers of the majority shareholder, may be viewed as independent of the company’s management.
(b)    In respect of each director to be appointed to fill a vacancy and each director to be nominated for election or re-election by the shareholders, the board shall make an express determination as to whether he or she is an independent director and, for a director who may become a member of the audit committee, whether he or she is an audit committee financial expert or financially literate.
(b)
In respect of each director to be appointed to fill a vacancy and each director to be nominated for election or
re-election
by the shareholders, the board shall make an express determination as to whether he or she is an independent director and, for a director who may become a member of the audit committee, whether he or she is an audit committee financial expert or financially literate.
(c)    The term "independent", shall have the meaning as set out in applicable law, including on the basis of the standards specified by National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees, the US. Securities and Exchange Commission rules and the listing standards of the NYSE American LLC.
(c)
The term “independent”, shall have the meaning as set out in applicable law, including on the basis of the standards specified by National Instrument
52-110
Audit Committees, the US. Securities and Exchange Commission rules and the listing standards of the NYSE American LLC.
(d)
Independent directors will have full access to senior management of the corporation and other employees on request to discuss the business and affairs of the corporation. The board expects that there will be regular opportunities for directors to meet with the chief executive officer, and other members of management in board and committee meetings and in other formal or informal settings.
(e)
Compensation for independent directors will be determined by the board on the recommendation of the nominations and corporate governance committee and will be reviewed annually.
Non-employee
director compensation will be set at a level that is consistent with market practice, taking into account the size and scope of the corporation’s business and the responsibilities of its directors. A substantial portion of the compensation paid to independent directors for service on the board will be paid in restricted stock units of the corporation.

190

(d)    Independent directors will have full access to senior management of the corporation and other employees on request to discuss the business and affairs of the corporation. The board expects that there will be regular opportunities for directors to meet with the chief executive officer, and other members of management in board and committee meetings and in other formal or informal settings.
(e)    Compensation for independent directors will be determined by the board on the recommendation of the nominations and corporate governance committee and will be reviewed annually. Non-employee director compensation will be set at a level that is consistent with market practice, taking into account the size and scope of the corporation’s business and the responsibilities of its directors. A substantial portion of the compensation paid to independent directors for service on the board will be paid in restricted stock units of the corporation.

8. Lead Director
The independent directors will annually select one independent director to serve as lead director. The appointment of a lead director is intended to ensure that the board functions with appropriate independence and to enhance the company’s corporate governance. It is normally expected that the same director will serve as lead director for a minimum of two years.
The lead director’s duties and responsibilities will include:
(a)    act as liaison with the chairman, in consultation with the other directors, (provided however that each director will also be afforded direct and complete access to the chairman at any time as such director deems necessary or appropriate);
(b)    calls, chairs and sets agendas for executive sessions of the independent directors;
(c)    provides feedback to the chairman;
(d)    chairs meetings of the board in the absence of the chairman;
(e)    reviews and approves the schedule and agenda for all board and committee meetings and reviews associated materials distributed to the directors;
(f)    advises the chairman as to the quality, quantity and timeliness of information flows;
(g)    working together with the chairman, oversees the annual performance evaluation of the board; and
(h)    working together with the chair of the executive resources committee, oversees the annual performance review of the CEO.
Compensation for the lead director will be determined by the board on the recommendation of the nominations and corporate governance committee and will be reviewed annually.

9. Independent legal or other advice
It is normally expected that information regarding the corporation’s business and affairs will be provided to the board by the corporation’s management and staff and by its independent auditors. However, the board and, with the approval of the board, any director, may engage independent counsel and other advisors at the expense of the corporation. The fees and expenses of any such advisor will be paid by the corporation.

9.10. Meetings of the independent directors in the absence of members of management
(a)    Meetings of the independent directors ("executive sessions of the board") shall be held in conjunction with all board meetings including unscheduled virtual board meetings. Additional executive sessions may be convened by the lead director at his or her discretion and will be convened if requested by any other director. Any independent director may raise issues for discussion at an executive session.
(a)
Meetings of the independent directors (“executive sessions of the board”) shall be held in conjunction with all board meetings including unscheduled telephonic board meetings. Additional executive sessions may be convened by the chair or the executive sessions at his or her discretion and will be convened if requested by any other director. Any independent director may raise issues for discussion at an executive session.

(b)
The chair of the executive sessions of the board shall be chosen by the independent directors.
(b)    The lead director, or in the lead director's absence, an independent director chosen by the independent directors, shall preside at executive sessions of the board and ensure that meetings of the independent directors are held in accordance with this charter.
(c)
The chair of the executive sessions of the board, or in the chair’s absence an independent director chosen by the independent directors, shall
(i)
preside at executive sessions of the board;

(ii)
ensure that meetings of the independent directors are held in accordance with this charter;
(c)    The purposes of the executive sessions of the board shall include the following:
(iii)
review, and modify if necessary the agenda of the meetings of the board in advance to ensure that the board may successfully carry out its duties; and

(iv)
act as a liaison with the chairman, including providing feedback from the executive sessions to the chairman, provided that each director will also be afforded direct and complete access to the chairman at any time as such director deems necessary or appropriate.
(i)    to raise substantive issues that are more appropriately discussed in the absence of management;

182
(ii)    to discuss the need to communicate to the chairman of the board any matter of concern raised by any committee or any director;

(d)
The purposes of the executive sessions of the board shall include the following:
(i)
to raise substantive issues that are more appropriately discussed in the absence of management;
(ii)
to discuss the need to communicate to the chairman of the board any matter of concern raised by any committee or any director;
(iii)
to address issues raised but not resolved at meetings of the board and assess any
follow-up
needs with the chairman of the board;
(iv)
to discuss the quality, quantity, and timeliness of the flow of information from management that is necessary for the independent directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties, and advise the chairman of the board of any changes required; and
(v)
to seek feedback about board processes.

10.191

(iii)    to address issues raised but not resolved at meetings of the board and assess any follow-up needs with the chairman of the board;

(iv)    to discuss the quality, quantity, and timeliness of the flow of information from management that is necessary for the independent directors to effectively and responsibly perform their duties, and advise the chairman of the board of any changes required; and

(v)    to seek feedback about board processes.

11. Selection and tenure of directors
The nominations and corporate governance committee shall recommend to the board a slate of director candidates for election at each annual meeting of shareholders and shall recommend to the board directors to fill vacancies, including vacancies created as a result of any increase of the size of the board.

The guidelines for selection and tenure of directors shall be as follows:

(a)
Selection
(a) Selection
In considering the qualifications of potential nominees for election as directors, the nominations and corporate governance committee considers the work experience and other areas of expertise of the potential nominees with the objective of providing for diversity among
non-employee
directors. The following key criteria are considered to be relevant to the work of the board of directors and its committees:

Work Experience
Experience in leadership of businesses or other large organizations (Leadership of large organizations)
Operations/technical experience (Operations / technical)
Project management experience (Project management)
Experience in working in a global work environment (Global experience)
Experience in development of business strategy (Strategy development)
Experience with environmental, health, community relations and/or safety policy, practices and management (Environment and sustainability)

Other Expertise
Audit committee financial expert
Expertise in financial matters (Financial expertise)
Expertise in managing relations with government (Government relations)
Experience in academia or in research (Academic / research)
Expertise in information technology and cybersecurity oversight (Information technology / Cybersecurity oversight)
Expertise in executive compensation policies and practices (Executive compensation)
Expertise in oversight of risk management policies and practices (Risk management)

In addition, the nominations and corporate governance committee may consider the following additional factors:
possessing expertise in any of the following areas: law, science, marketing, administration, social/political environment or community and civic affairs;
individual competencies in business and other areas of endeavour in contributing to the collective experience of the directors; and
providing diversity in age, regional association, gender and other diversity elements (including AboriginalIndigenous peoples, persons with disabilities and members of visible minorities).

183

The nominations and corporate governance committee shall then assess what work experience and other expertise each existing director possesses. The nominations and corporate governance committee shall identify individuals qualified to become new board members and recommend to the board the new director nominees. In making its recommendations, the nominations and corporate governance committee shall consider the work experience and other expertise that the board considers each existing director to possess and which each new nominee will bring. The nominations and corporate governance committee may also consider the additional factors noted above and any other factors which it believes to be relevant.

A candidate may be nominated for directorship after consideration has been given as to his or her degree of compatibility with the following criteria, i.e., as to whether he or she:
will not adversely affect the requirements with respect to citizenship and residency for the directors imposed by the
Canada Business Corporations Act
;


192

will not adversely affect the corporation’s status as a foreign private issuer under U.S. securities legislation;

possesses the ability to contribute to the broad range of issues with which the directors and any one or all of the committees of directors must deal;

will serve on the boards of other public companies only to the extent that such services do not detract from the director’s ability to devote the necessary time and attention as a director;

is able to devote the necessary amount of time to prepare for and attend all meetings of the directors and committees of directors, and to keep abreast of significant corporate developments;

is free of any present or apparent potential legal impediment or conflict of interest, such as:
¦
serving as an employee or principal of any organization presently providing a significant level of service to the corporation or which might so provide to the corporation, for example, institutions engaged in commercial banking, underwriting, law, management consulting, insurance, or trust companies; or of any substantial customer or supplier of the corporation;

¦
serving as an employee or director of a competitor of the corporation, such as petroleum or chemical businesses, or of a significant competitor of corporations represented by a director of this corporation;
serving as an employee or principal of any organization presently providing a significant level of service to the corporation or which might so provide to the corporation, for example, institutions engaged in commercial banking, underwriting, law, management consulting, insurance, or trust companies; or of any substantial customer or supplier of the corporation;
¦
serving as the chief executive officer or a top administrator of an organization that has the chief executive officer or a top administrator of this corporation serving as director;

serving as an employee or director of a competitor of the corporation, such as petroleum or chemical businesses, or of a significant competitor of corporations represented by a director of this corporation;

serving as the chief executive officer or a top administrator of an organization that has the chief executive officer or a top administrator of this corporation serving as director;

is expected to remain qualified to serve for a minimum of five years;

will not, at the time that he or she stands for election or appointment, have attained the age of 72;

if an independent director, is, or will become within a period of five years of becoming a director, the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of not less than 16,500 common shares, deferred share units or restricted stock units of the corporation.

(b)
Tenure
(b) Tenure
(i)
Re-nomination
An incumbent director shall be supported for
re-nomination
as long as he or she:

does not suffer from any disability that would prevent the effective discharge of his or her responsibilities as a director;

makes a positive contribution to the effective performance of the directors;

regularly attends directors’ and committee meetings;

184

has not made a change with respect to principal position or thrust of involvement or regional association that would significantly detract from his or her value as a director of the corporation;

is not otherwise, to a significant degree, incompatible with the criteria established for use in the selection process;

in a situation where it is known that a director will become incompatible with the criteria established for use in the selection process within a three-month period of election, such as retirement from principal position at age 65, this information would be included in the management proxy circular, and where possible, information regarding the proposed replacement would also be included;

will not, at the time that he or she stands for
re-election,
have attained the age of 72; however, under exceptional circumstances, at the request of the chairman, the nominations and corporate governance committee may continue to support the nomination.


193

(ii) Resignation
An incumbent director will resign in the event that he or she:

experiences a change in circumstances such as a change in his or her principal occupation, including an officer of the corporation ceasing to hold that position, but not merely a change in geographic location;

displays a change in the exercise of his or her powers and in the discharge of duties that, in the opinion of at least 75 percent of the directors, is incompatible with the duty of care of a director as defined in the
Canada Business Corporations Act;
Act;

has made a change in citizenship or residency that will adversely affect the requirements for directors with respect to those areas imposed by the
Canada Business Corporations Act;

has made a change in citizenship or residency that adversely affects the corporation’s status as a foreign private issuer under U.S. securities legislation;

develops a conflict of interest, such as
¦
assuming a position as an employee or principal with any organization providing a significant level of service to the corporation, for example, institutions engaged in commercial banking, underwriting, law, management consulting, insurance, or trust companies; or with any substantial customer or supplier of the corporation;
assuming a position as an employee or principal with any organization providing a significant level of service to the corporation, for example, institutions engaged in commercial banking, underwriting, law, management consulting, insurance, or trust companies; or with any substantial customer or supplier of the corporation;
¦
assuming a position as an employee or director of any competitor of the corporation, such as petroleum or chemical businesses, or of a competitor of corporations represented by a director of this corporation;

¦
assuming the position of chief executive officer or a top administrator of an organization that has the chief executive officer or a top administrator of this corporation serving as a director;
assuming a position as an employee or director of any competitor of the corporation, such as petroleum or chemical businesses, or of a competitor of corporations represented by a director of this corporation;
¦
becomes unable to devote the necessary amount of time to prepare for and regularly attend meetings of the directors and committees of directors, and to keep abreast of significant corporate developments,

assuming the position of chief executive officer or a top administrator of an organization that has the chief executive officer or a top administrator of this corporation serving as a director;

becomes unable to devote the necessary amount of time to prepare for and regularly attend meetings of the directors and committees of directors, and to keep abreast of significant corporate developments,

and the nominations and corporate governance committee will make a recommendation to the board as to whether to accept or reject such resignation.

185

11.12. Election of Directors
All directors will stand for election at the annual meeting of shareholders. If the majority shareholder’s holdings were ever to fall below 50% for any
non-contested
elections of directors, any director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” in such election shall tender his or her resignation. Within 90 days after certification of the election results, the board will decide, through a process managed by the nominations and corporate governance committee and excluding the nominee in question, whether to accept the resignation. Absent a compelling reason for the director to remain on the board, the board shall accept the resignation. The board will promptly disclose and, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the tendered resignation.

12.13. Director Orientation and Continuing Education
(a)
Orientation
New
non-employee
directors will receive a comprehensive orientation from appropriate executives regarding the corporation’s business and affairs.

(b)
Continuing Education
Reviews of aspects of the corporation’s operations will be presented by appropriate employees from time to time as part of the agenda of regular board meetings. The board will also normally conduct an
on-site
visit to a location other than the corporation’s headquarters in conjunction with one or more regular board meetings every year.

13.14. Chairman and chief executive officer
The board currently believes that it is appropriate and efficient for the corporation’s chief executive officer to also act as chairman of the board. However, the board retains the authority to separate those functions if it deems such action appropriate in the future.

(a)
194

(a)    Position description
The chairman and chief executive officer shall:
plan and organize all activities of the board of directors;
·
plan and organize all activities of the board of directors;
·
ensure that the board receives sufficient, timely information on all material aspects of the corporation’s operations and financial affairs;
·
chair annual and special meetings of the shareholders;
·
conduct the general management and direction of the business and affairs of the corporation;
·
recommend to the board of directors a strategic plan for the corporation’s business and, when approved by the board of directors, implement this strategic plan and report to the board of directors on the implementation of this strategic plan;
·
develop and implement operational policies to guide the corporation within the limits prescribed by the corporation’s
by-laws
and the directions adopted by the board of directors;
·
identify, for review with the board of directors, the principal risks of the corporation’s business, where identifiable, and develop appropriate systems to manage such risks;
·
under the oversight of the board of directors, develop plans for succession planning for senior management, including the appointing, training and monitoring thereof, and implement those plans;
·
ensure compliance with the corporation’s code of ethics and business conduct so as to foster a culture of integrity throughout the company; and
·
ensure effective internal controls and management information systems are in place.
ensure that the board receives sufficient, timely information on all material aspects of the corporation's operations and financial affairs;
chair annual and special meetings of the shareholders;
conduct the general management and direction of the business and affairs of the corporation;
recommend to the board of directors a strategic plan for the corporation's business and, when approved by the board of directors, implement this strategic plan and report to the board of directors on the implementation of this strategic plan;
develop and implement operational policies to guide the corporation within the limits prescribed by the corporation's by-laws and the directions adopted by the board of directors;
identify, for review with the board of directors, the principal risks of the corporation's business, where identifiable, and develop appropriate systems to manage such risks;
under the oversight of the board of directors, develop plans for succession planning for senior management, including the appointing, training and monitoring thereof, and implement those plans;
ensure compliance with the corporation's code of ethics and business conduct so as to foster a culture of integrity throughout the company; and
ensure effective internal controls and management information systems are in place.
(b)
Minimum shareholding requirements
The chairman and chief executive officer shall hold, or shall, within three years after his appointment as chairman and chief executive officer, acquire shares of the corporation, including common shares and restricted stock units, of a value no less than five times his base salary.


186

Audit Committee Charter

1. Purpose of the Committee
The primary purpose of the audit committee (the “committee”"committee") is oversight.oversight of financial reporting, compliance and controls. The independence of the committee is a critical component of corporate governance as the committee holds the board and management accountable and fosters trust and confidence for all stakeholders, which is vital for the generation of long-term value. The committee shall assist the board of directors (the “board”"board") in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee:

·
management’s conduct of the corporation’s financial reporting process,
management's conduct of the corporation's financial reporting process,
·
the integrity of the financial statements and other financial information provided by the corporation to Canadian securities regulators, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the public,
the integrity of the financial statements and other financial information provided by the corporation to Canadian securities regulators, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and the public,
·
the corporation’s system of internal accounting and financial controls,
the corporation's system of internal accounting and financial controls,
·
the corporation’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements,
the corporation's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements,
·
the performance of the corporation’s internal audit function,
the performance of the corporation's internal audit function,
·
the independent auditors’ qualifications, performance, and independence, and
the independent auditors' qualifications, performance, and independence, and
the annual independent audit of the corporation's financial statements.
·
the annual independent audit of the corporation’s financial statements.

The corporation’scorporation's management is responsible for preparing the corporation’scorporation's financial statements. The independent auditors are responsible for auditing those financial statements. Management, including the internal audit function, and the independent auditors, have more time, knowledge, and detailed information about the corporation than do committee members. Consequently, in carrying out its oversight responsibilities,
195

the committee is not providing any expert or special assurance as to the corporation’scorporation's financial statements, or any professional certification as to the independent auditors’auditors' work, including with respect to auditor independence. Each member of the committee shall be entitled to rely on the integrity of people and organizations from whom the committee receives information and the accuracy of such information, including representations by management and the independent auditors regarding
non-audit
services provided by the independent auditors.

2. Committee Membership
The committee shall consist of no fewer than three members. Committee members shall be appointed by the board from among its independent members who shall serve at the pleasure of the board, but only so long as he or she continues to be a director of the corporation and is independent. Each member of the committee must satisfy such criteria of independence as the board may establish and such additional regulatory or listing requirements as the board may determine to be applicable or appropriate. Each member of the committee shall serve only so long as he or she continues to be a director of the corporation and is independent. The actual number of members shall be determined from time to time by resolution of the board.

Accordingly, each member of the committee shall be financially literate within a reasonable period of time after appointment to the committee; must be “independent”"independent" as defined in the board charter; and may not serve on more than two other public company audit committees unless the board determines that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of the member to serve effectively on the committee. In addition, at least one member of the committee shall be an “audit"audit committee financial expert”expert" as defined by applicable laws.

3. Committee Structure and Operation
The chair and vice-chair of the committee shall be designated by the board from among the members of the committee. The committee shall fix its own rules of procedure and shall meet where and as provided by such rules or by resolution of the committee. In addition to the regular meeting schedule established by the committee, the chair of the committee may call a special meeting at any time.
187

The chair, or in that person’sperson's absence, the vice-chair or in the vice-chair’svice-chair's absence, an alternate designated by the committee, shall:
(a)    preside at committee meetings;
(a)
preside at committee meetings;
(b)    ensure that meetings of the committee are held in accordance with this charter; and
(b)
ensure that meetings of the committee are held in accordance with this charter; and
(c)
(c)    review, and modify if necessary the agenda of the meetings of this committee in advance to ensure that the committee may effectively carry out its duties.
A majority of the members of the committee shall constitute a quorum thereof. Every question shall be decided by a majority of the votes cast on the question and in the case of an equality of votes, the chair of the meeting shall be entitled to a second or casting vote.
The committee shall designate its secretary.
Meetings of the committee may be called by any member or by the external auditors of the corporation, and notice of every meeting shall be given to the external auditors.
The external auditors and the internal auditor of the corporation shall report directly to the audit committee.
The committee shall act only on the affirmative vote of a majority of the members at a meeting or by unanimous written consent.
The committee may establish
sub-committees
to carry out such duties as the committee may assign.
4. Committee Activities
The following shall be the common recurring activities of the committee in carrying out its purposes. These activities are set forth as a guide with the understanding that the committee may diverge from this guide as appropriate given the circumstances.
The committee shall:
(a)    recommend the external auditors to be appointed by the shareholders, review and recommend their remuneration to the board, approve advances on such remuneration, which shall be paid by the corporation, and oversee their work, including the resolution of disagreements between management and the external auditor regarding financial reporting.
(a)
recommend the external auditors to be appointed by the shareholders, review and recommend their remuneration to the board, approve advances on such remuneration, which shall be paid by the corporation, and oversee their work, including the resolution of disagreements between management and the external auditor regarding financial reporting.
(b)
(b)    approve the proposed current year audit program of the external auditors and assess the results of the program after the end of the program period.
(c)
approve in advance any
non-audit
services that are permitted by applicable law to be performed by the external auditors after considering the effect of such services on their independence.
(d)
receive from the external auditors a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the external auditor and the corporation consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard 1, and shall actively engage in a dialogue with the external auditor with respect to any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the external auditor and shall recommend that the board take any appropriate action to oversee the independence of the external auditor.
(e)
maintain hiring policies for employees and former employees of the independent auditors.
(f)
establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the corporation regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the corporation of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.
188

(g)
approve the proposed current year audit program of the internal auditors and assess the results of the program after the end of each quarter.
(h)
review the adequacy of the corporation’s system of internal controls and auditing procedures.
(i)
review the accounting and financial reporting processes of the corporation.
(j)
approve changes proposed by management in accounting principles and practices, and review changes proposed by the accounting profession or other regulatory bodies which impact directly on such principles and practices.
(k)
review the quarterly news release of financial and operating results, the annual and quarterly financial statements of the corporation, any accounting items affecting the statements and the overall format and content of the statements, and the related management discussion and analysis, prior to approval of such news release and financial statements by the board of directors.
(l)
review the results of the corporation’s business ethics compliance program.
(m)
review annually a summary of senior management expense accounts.
(n)
evaluate, along with the other members of the board, management, the controller, and the general auditor, the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditors, including the performance of the lead audit partner.
(o)
require attendances at its meetings by members of management, as the committee may direct.
(p)
undertake such additional activities within the scope of its responsibilities as it may deem appropriate.
196

(c)    approve in advance any non-audit services that are permitted by applicable law to be performed by the external auditors after considering the effect of such services on their independence.
(d)    receive from the external auditors a formal written statement delineating all relationships between the external auditor and the corporation consistent with Independence Standards Board Standard 1, and shall actively engage in a dialogue with the external auditor with respect to any disclosed relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the external auditor and shall recommend that the board take any appropriate action to oversee the independence of the external auditor.
(e)    maintain hiring policies for employees and former employees of the independent auditors.
(f)    establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the corporation regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the corporation of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.
(g)    approve the proposed current year audit program of the internal auditors and assess the results of the program after the end of each quarter.
(h)    review the adequacy of the corporation's system of internal controls and auditing procedures.
(i)    review the accounting and financial reporting processes of the corporation.
(j)    provide oversight regarding the corporation’s tax compliance activities.
(k)    approve changes proposed by management in accounting principles and practices, and review changes proposed by the accounting profession or other regulatory bodies which impact directly on such principles and practices.
(l)    review the quarterly news release of financial and operating results, the annual and quarterly financial statements of the corporation, any accounting items affecting the statements and the overall format and content of the statements, and the related management discussion and analysis, prior to approval of such news release and financial statements by the board of directors.
(m)    review the results of the corporation's business ethics compliance program.
(n)    review related party transactions to assess the commercial reasonableness of those transactions, and to ensure that all such transactions are entered into in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
(o)    provide oversight regarding the corporation’s anonymous ethics hotline.
(p)    review annually a summary of senior management expense accounts.
(q)    evaluate, along with the other members of the board, management, the controller, and the general auditor, the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditors, including the performance of the lead audit partner.
(r)    require attendances at its meetings by members of management, as the committee may direct.
(s)    undertake such additional activities within the scope of its responsibilities as it may deem appropriate.

5. Committee Evaluation
The committee will annually complete a self-evaluation of the committee’scommittee's own performance and effectiveness and will consider whether any changes to the committee’s charter are appropriate.
6. Resources and Authority of the Committee
The committee has exclusive authority with respect to the retention of the independent auditors described in section 4 of this charter. In discharging its oversight role, the committee is empowered to investigate any matter brought to its attention with full access to all books, records, facilities, and personnel of the corporation. The committee also has the authority to retain outside advisors, including legal counsel, auditors, or other experts, as it deems appropriate; to approve the fees and expenses of such advisors; and to incur such other ordinary administrative expenses as are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties.

197

Public PolicySafety and Corporate ResponsibilitySustainability Committee Charter

1. Purpose of the Committee
The primary purpose of the public policysafety and corporate responsibilitysustainability committee (the ‘committee’'committee') is to reviewprovide oversight and provide advice, as the committee deems appropriate, regarding the corporation’s policies, programs and practicesguidance on public issues of significance including their effects onmatters related to safety, security, health and the environment.environment, with a view to generation of long-term value. This includes environmental, health, personnel and process safety, security and sustainability risks and performance, including the risks associated with climate change. It also includes compliance with legislation and the assessment of long term impacts of public policy, climate change, stakeholder and sustainable business practicesIndigenous relations on corporate performance.performance, while fostering long-term sustainability and responsible business practices.
189

2. Committee Membership
The committee shall consist of no fewer than three members, to be appointed by the board of directors from among (a) the independent directors; and (b) the
non-independent
directors who are not members of the corporation’scorporation's management, who shall serve at the pleasure of the board, but only so long as he or she continues to be a director of the corporation. The actual number of members shall be determined from time to time by resolution of the board. Members of the committee should be suitably knowledgeable in matters pertaining to public issues.

3. Committee Structure and Operation
The chair and vice-chair of the committee shall be designated by the board from among the members of the committee. The committee shall fix its own rules of procedure and shall meet where and as provided by such rules or by resolution of the committee.

The chair, or in that person’sperson's absence, the vice-chair or in the vice-chair’svice-chair's absence, an alternate designated by the committee, shall:

(a)
(a)    preside at committee meetings;
(b)
ensure that meetings of the committee are held in accordance with this charter; and

(c)
review,(b)    ensure that meetings of the committee are held in accordance with this charter; and modify if necessary the agenda of the meetings of this committee in advance to ensure that the committee may effectively carry out its duties.

(c)    review, and modify if necessary the agenda of the meetings of this committee in advance to ensure that the committee may effectively carry out its duties.

A majority of the members of the committee shall constitute a quorum thereof. Every question shall be decided by a majority of the votes cast on the question and in the case of an equality of votes, the chair of the meeting shall be entitled to a second or casting vote.

The committee shall designate its secretary.

Meetings of the committee may be called by any member.

The committee shall act only on the affirmative vote of a majority of the members at a meeting or by unanimous written consent.

The committee may establish subcommittees consisting of one or more members to carry out such duties as the committee may delegate.

4.Committee Activities
The following shall be the common recurring activities of the committee in carrying out its purpose. These activities are set forth as a guide with the understanding that the committee may diverge from this guide as appropriate given the circumstances.
The committee shall:
(a)    provide oversight regarding the effectiveness of the corporation's policies, programs and practices on environment, health, safety, security and sustainability, including the impact, risks and disclosure associated with climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, and make such recommendations to the board with respect thereto as it may deem advisable.

198
(a)
review and monitor the effectiveness of the corporation’s policies, programs and practices on environment, health, safety, security and sustainability, including the impact, risks and disclosure associated with climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, and make such recommendations to the board with respect thereto as it may deem advisable.
(b)
monitor the corporation’s compliance with legislative, regulatory and corporation standards for environmental, health, safety, security and sustainability practices and matters, including the impact, risks and disclosure associated with climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, and advise the directors on the results and adequacy thereof.
(c)
monitor trends and review current and emerging public policy issues relating to matters of significance to the corporation, including environment, health, safety, security and sustainability issues and the impact, risks and disclosure associated with climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, as they may impact the corporation’s operations.
190
(b)    provide oversight regarding the corporation's compliance with legislative, regulatory and corporation standards for environmental, health, safety, security and sustainability practices and matters, including the impact, risks and disclosure associated with climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, and provide guidance to the board on the results and adequacy thereof.

Table(c)    provide oversight regarding current and emerging public policy issues relating to matters of Contentssignificance to the corporation, including environment, health, safety, security and sustainability issues and the impact, risks and disclosure associated with climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, as they may impact the corporation's operations.
(d)
review the impact of proposed legislation relating to matters of significance to the corporation, including the impact of the environment, health, safety and security on the operations of the corporation and to advise the directors(d)    review the impact of proposed legislation relating to matters of significance to the corporation, including the impact of the environment, health, safety and security on the operations of the corporation and provide guidance to the board and management as to the appropriate response of the corporation thereto.
(e)
recommend to the directors and management desirable policies and actions arising from its review and monitoring activity.
(e)    provide oversight regarding current and emerging issues related to government, stakeholder and Indigenous relations.
(f)
require attendances at its meetings by members of management, as the committee may direct.
(f)    provide oversight regarding implementation of the corporation’s Indigenous Relations Principles and Guidelines.
(g)
undertake such additional activities within the scope of its responsibilities as it may deem appropriate.
(g)    review and provide guidance on the corporation’s overall community investment strategies and programs including approval of all grants or contributions for charitable contributions and local community contributions in excess of $500,000.
(h)    recommend to the board and management desirable policies and actions arising from its oversight and guidance activity.
(i)    require attendances at its meetings by members of management, as the committee may direct.
(j)    undertake such additional activities within the scope of its responsibilities as it may deem appropriate.

5. Committee Evaluation
The committee will annually complete a self-evaluation of the committee’scommittee's own performance and effectiveness and will consider whether any changes to the committee’s charter are appropriate.
6. Resources and Authority of the Committee
The committee has the authority to retain such outside advisors, including legal counsel or other experts, as it deems appropriate, and to approve the fees and expenses of such advisors.


Executive Resources Committee Charter

1. Purpose of the Committee
The primary purpose of the executive resources committee (the “committee”) is to discharge the board of directors’directors' (the “board”) responsibilities relating to the evaluation and compensation of the corporation’scorporation's chief executive officer (the “CEO”) and certain other key senior executive management positions reporting directly to the CEO, including all officers of the corporation, and to discharge the responsibilities of the committee under applicable rules and regulations. The committee also makes recommendations to the board regarding succession planning and development for senior executives and positions as needed. The committee is responsible for implementation and oversight of a compensation philosophy and program to incentivize the creation of long-term value, and to develop appropriate performance-based evaluation for the CEO and senior executives to support the corporation’s long-term value creation strategies.
2. Committee Membership
The committee shall consist of no fewer than three members, to be appointed by the board of directors from among (a) the independent directors; and (b) the
non-independent
directors who are not members of the corporation’scorporation's management, who shall serve at the pleasure of the board, but only so long as he or she continues to be a director of the corporation. The actual number of members shall be determined from time to time by resolution of the board. Members of the committee should be suitably knowledgeable in matters pertaining to executive compensation.

199

3. Committee Structure and Operation
The chair and vice-chair of the committee shall be designated by the board from among the members of the committee. The committee shall fix its own rules of procedure and shall meet where and as provided by such rules or by resolution of the committee.
The chair, or in that person’sperson's absence, the vice-chair or in the vice-chair’svice-chair's absence, an alternate designated by the committee, shall:
(a)    preside at committee meetings;
(a)
preside at committee meetings;
(b)    ensure that meetings of the committee are held in accordance with this charter; and
(b)
ensure that meetings of the committee are held in accordance with this charter; and
(c)
(c)    review, and modify if necessary the agenda of the meetings of this committee in advance to ensure that the committee may effectively carry out its duties.
191

A majority of the members of the committee shall constitute a quorum thereof. Every question shall be decided by a majority of the votes cast on the question and in the case of an equality of votes, the chair of the meeting shall be entitled to a second or casting vote.
The committee shall designate its secretary.
Meetings of the committee may be called by any member.
The committee shall act only on the affirmative vote of a majority of the members at a meeting or by unanimous written consent.
The committee may establish subcommittees consisting of one or more members to carry out such duties as the committee may delegate.

4. Committee Activities
The following shall be the common recurring activities of the committee in carrying out its purposes. These activities are set forth as a guide with the understanding that the committee may diverge from this guide as appropriate given the circumstances.
The committee shall:
(a)review and approve the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO.
(a)
review and approve the corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the CEO.
(b)review data on competitive compensation practices and review and evaluate policies and programs through which the corporation compensates its employees.
(b)
review data on competitive compensation practices and review and evaluate policies and programs through which the corporation compensates its employees.
(c)at least annually evaluate the CEO's performance as measured against the goals and objectives outlined above.
(c)
at least annually evaluate the CEO’s performance as measured against the goals and objectives outlined above.
(d)approve salaries and other compensation (including supplemental compensation such as cash bonuses and incentive bonus units, long-term incentive compensation such as restricted stock units, and any other payments for service), for the CEO and other key senior executive management positions reporting directly to the CEO, including all officers of the corporation.
(d)
approve salaries and other compensation (including supplemental compensation such as cash bonuses and incentive bonus units, long-term incentive compensation such as restricted stock units, and any other payments for service), for the CEO and other key senior executive management positions reporting directly to the CEO, including all officers of the corporation.
(e)at least annually review succession planning and development strategies for the CEO and key senior executive management positions reporting directly to the CEO, including all officers of the corporation.
(e)
at least annually review succession planning and development strategies for the CEO and key senior executive management positions reporting directly to the CEO, including all officers of the corporation.
(f)review the executive development system to ensure that it foresees the corporation’s senior management requirements and provides for early identification and development of key resources.
(f)
review the executive development system to ensure that it foresees the corporation’s senior management requirements and provides for early identification and development of key resources.
(g)review and approve an annual report on compensation for inclusion in the corporation’s management proxy circular in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
(g)
review and approve an annual report on compensation for inclusion in the corporation’s management proxy circular in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
(h)make recommendations to the board with respect to incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans.
(h)
make recommendations to the board with respect to incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans.
(i)review proposed terms of any new incentive program and any major amendment of an existing program, and make such recommendations to the board with respect thereto as it may deem advisable.
(i)
review proposed terms of any new incentive program and any major amendment of an existing program, and make such recommendations to the board with respect thereto as it may deem advisable.
(j)
review and report on risks arising from the corporation’s compensation policies and practices for employees as required by Canadian securities regulators and stock exchanges on which the corporation’s stock trades.
(k)
consider factors that could affect the independence or represent a conflict of interest on the part of any compensation consultant, independent legal counsel, or other adviser the committee may retain and report thereon as required by Canadian securities regulators and stock exchanges on which the corporation’s stock trades.
(l)
require attendances at its meetings by members of management, as the committee may direct.
(m)
undertake such additional activities within the scope of its responsibilities as it may deem appropriate.
192

Table of Contents(j)provide oversight regarding risks arising from the corporation's compensation policies and practices for employees as required by Canadian securities regulators and stock exchanges on which the corporation’s stock trades.
200

(k)consider factors that could affect the independence or represent a conflict of interest on the part of any compensation consultant, independent legal counsel, or other adviser the committee may retain and report thereon as required by Canadian securities regulators and stock exchanges on which the corporation’s stock trades.
(l)administer the company’s Policy for the Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation.
(m)require attendances at its meetings by members of management, as the committee may direct.
(n)undertake such additional activities within the scope of its responsibilities as it may deem appropriate.

5. Committee Evaluation
The committee will annually complete a self-evaluation of the committee’scommittee's own performance and effectiveness and will consider whether any changes to the committee’s charter are appropriate.
6. Resources and Authority of the Committee
The committee and, with the approval of the committee, any member, may engage independent counsel, compensation consultants or other advisors at the expense of the corporation. The committee shall be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of any independent legal counsel, compensation consultant or other advisor retained by the committee. The committee may select outside legal counsel, a compensation consultant or other advisor (an “Advisor”) to the committee only after taking into consideration all factors relevant to the Advisor’s independence from management, including the following:
the provision of other services to the corporation by the person that employs the Advisor;
the amount of fees received from the corporation by the person that employs the Advisor as a percentage of such that person’s total revenue;
the policies and procedures of the person that employs the Advisor that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest;
any business or personal relationship of the Advisor with a member of the committee;
any stock of the corporation owned by the Advisor; and
any business or personal relationship of the Advisor or the person employing the Advisor with an executive officer of the corporation.


·
the provision of other services to the corporation by the person that employs the Advisor;
·
the amount of fees received from the corporation by the person that employs the Advisor as a percentage of such that person’s total revenue;
·
the policies and procedures of the person that employs the Advisor that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest;
·
any business or personal relationship of the Advisor with a member of the committee;
·
any stock of the corporation owned by the Advisor; and
·
any business or personal relationship of the Advisor or the person employing the Advisor with an executive officer of the corporation.
Nominations and Corporate Governance Committee Charter

1. Purpose of the Committee
The primary purpose of the nominations and corporate governance committee (the ‘committee’'committee') is to monitor compliance with good corporate governance standards; to identify individuals qualified to become board members; to recommend to the board director nominees for election at the annual meeting of shareholders or for election by the board to fill open seats between annual meetings; to recommend to the board committee appointments for directors, including appointments as chair and vice chairvice-chair of such committees; to review and make recommendations to the board regarding
non-employee
director compensation; and to develop and recommend to the board corporate governance guidelines applicable to the corporation. Long term value creation requires strong corporate governance to ensure appropriate transparency and accountability. The committee aims to build and maintain an engaged and diverse board whose composition is appropriate in light of the corporation’s needs and strategy.
2. Committee Membership
The committee shall consist of no fewer than three members, to be appointed by the board of directors from among (a) the independent directors; and (b) the
non-independent
directors who are not members of the corporation’scorporation's management, who shall serve at the pleasure of the board, but only so long as he or she continues to be a director of the corporation. The actual number of members shall be determined from time to time by resolution of the board. Members of the committee should be suitably knowledgeable in matters pertaining to corporate governance.
193

201

3. Committee Structure and Operation
The chair and vice-chair of the committee shall be designated by the board from among the members of the committee. The committee shall fix its own rules of procedure and shall meet where and as provided by such rules or by resolution of the committee.
The chair, or in that person’sperson's absence, the vice-chair or in the vice-chair’svice-chair's absence, an alternate designated by the committee, shall:
(a)    preside at committee meetings;
(a)
preside at committee meetings;
(b)    ensure that meetings of the committee are held in accordance with this charter; and
(b)
ensure that meetings of the committee are held in accordance with this charter; and
(c)
(c)    review, and modify if necessary the agenda of the meetings of this committee in advance to ensure that the committee may effectively carry out its duties.
A majority of the members of the committee shall constitute a quorum thereof. Every question shall be decided by a majority of the votes cast on the question and in the case of an equality of votes, the chair of the meeting shall be entitled to a second or casting vote.
The committee shall designate its secretary.
Meetings of the committee may be called by any member.
The committee shall act only on the affirmative vote of a majority of the members at a meeting or by unanimous written consent.
The committee may establish subcommittees consisting of one or more members to carry out such duties as the committee may delegate.

4. Committee Activities
The following shall be the common recurring activities of the committee in carrying out its purpose. These activities are set forth as a guide with the understanding that the committee may diverge from this guide as appropriate given the circumstances.
The committee shall:
(a)provide oversight regarding issues of corporate governance as they apply to the corporation, including the effectiveness of the system of corporate governance, and the board's relationship with management, and report to the board on such matters.
(b)provide oversight regarding the annual assessment of the effectiveness and contribution of the board, its committees and each individual director.
(c)make recommendations to the board as to the appropriate size of the board with a view to facilitating effective decision-making.
(d)review and recommend to the board of directors any modifications to the charters of the board or any of its committees.
(e)review qualifications of existing directors and individuals suggested as potential candidates for director of the corporation, including candidates suggested by shareholders, and consider for nomination any of such individuals who are deemed qualified pursuant to the provisions of the board charter.
(f)recommend to the board the nominees to be proposed by the board for election as directors of the corporation at the annual meeting of shareholders.
(g)recommend to the board candidates for election as directors of the corporation to fill open seats on the board between annual meetings, including vacancies created by an increase in the authorized number of directors.
(h)consider resignations tendered by directors in the event of:
i.the majority shareholder’s holdings falling below 50%, for any non-contested election of directors in the event a nominee standing for election by shareholders in a non-contested election receives a greater number of votes withheld from his or her election than votes for such election and, in any such case, refer the matter to the board with the committee's recommendation whether such resignation should be accepted, or
ii.a change of circumstance as described in section 10(b)(ii) of the board charter.
(i)review the remuneration of independent directors, including the lead director, and make such recommendations to the board with respect thereto as it may deem advisable.
202
(a)
oversee issues of corporate governance as they apply to the corporation, including the effectiveness of the system of corporate governance, and the board’s relationship with management, and report to the board on such matters.
(b)
oversee the annual assessment of the effectiveness and contribution of the board, its committees and each individual director.
(c)
make recommendations to the board as to the appropriate size of the board with a view to facilitating effective decision-making.
(d)
review and recommend to the board of directors any modifications to the charters of the board or any of its committees.
(e)
review qualifications of existing directors and individuals suggested as potential candidates for director of the corporation, including candidates suggested by shareholders, and consider for nomination any of such individuals who are deemed qualified pursuant to the provisions of the board charter.
(f)
recommend to the board the nominees to be proposed by the board for election as directors of the corporation at the annual meeting of shareholders.
(g)
recommend to the board candidates for election as directors of the corporation to fill open seats on the board between annual meetings, including vacancies created by an increase in the authorized number of directors.
194
(j)review present plans, programs or arrangements, and any proposed terms of any new plans, programs or arrangements, for the benefit of independent directors, and make such recommendations to the board with respect thereto as it may deem advisable.

(h)
consider resignations tendered by directors in the event of:
(l)provide recommendations to the board concerning committee structure of the board, committee operations, committee member qualifications, and committee member appointment.
(i)
the majority shareholder’s holdings falling below 50%, for any
non-contested
election of directors in the event a nominee standing for election by shareholders in a
non-contested
election receives a greater number of votes withheld from his or her election than votes for such election and, in any such case, refer the matter to the board with the committee’s recommendation whether such resignation should be accepted, or
(ii)
a change of circumstance as described in section 10(b)(ii) of the board charter.
(m)provide oversight and recommendations regarding director education.
(i)
review the remuneration of independent directors and make such recommendations to the board with respect thereto as it may deem advisable.
(n)review any allegation that an executive officer or director may have violated the corporation's Standards of Business Conduct and report its findings to the board and the general auditor.
(j)
review present plans, programs or arrangements, and any proposed terms of any new plans, programs or arrangements, for the benefit of independent directors, and make such recommendations to the board with respect thereto as it may deem advisable.
(o)require attendances at its meetings by members of management, as the committee may direct.
(k)
review and recommend to the board guidelines to be adopted relating to tenure of independent directors.
(p)undertake such additional activities within the scope of its responsibilities as it may deem appropriate.

(l)
provide recommendations to the board concerning committee structure of the board, committee operations, committee member qualifications, and committee member appointment.
(m)
review any allegation that an executive officer or director may have violated the corporation’s Standards of Business Conduct and report its findings to the board and the general auditor.
(n)
require attendances at its meetings by members of management, as the committee may direct.
(o)
undertake such additional activities within the scope of its responsibilities as it may deem appropriate.
5. Committee Evaluation
The committee will annually complete a self-evaluation of the committee’scommittee's own performance and effectiveness and will consider whether any changes to the committee’s charter are appropriate.
6. Resources and Authority of the Committee
The committee has the authority to retain such outside advisors, including legal counsel or other experts, as it deems appropriate, and to approve the fees and expenses of such advisors. Without limiting the foregoing, the committee will have sole authority to retain and terminate any search firm to be used by the committee to identify director candidates and any consultant used by the committee to evaluate
non-employee
director compensation.


Community Collaboration and EngagementFinance Committee Charter

1.Purpose of the Committee
The primary purpose of the community collaboration and engagementfinance committee (the ‘committee’) is to reviewprovide oversight and provide advice onguidance regarding the corporation’s guidelines, procedurescapital structure/capital allocation, financial policies, practices and performance supporting public awarenessstrategies. The committee is responsible for ensuring that such matters align with the corporation’s strategy and consultation efforts, government, communityare aimed at the generation of long-term value and Indigenous relations,shall take such action and community partnershipmake such reports and investment programs.
recommendations to the board of directors as it deems advisable.
2.Committee Membership
The committee shall consist of no fewer than three members, to be appointed by the board of directors from among its(a) the independent directors; and (b) the non-independent directors who are not members of the corporation’s management, who shall serve at the pleasure of the board, but only so long as he or she continues to be a director of the corporation. The actual number of members shall be determined from time to time by resolution of the board. Members of the committee should be suitably knowledgeable in matters pertaining to issues relating to corporate contributions and community investment.
finance.

195

3.     Committee Structure and Operation
The chair and vice-chair of the committee shall be designated by the board from among the members of the committee. The committee shall fix its own rules of procedure and shall meet where and as provided by such rules or by resolution of the committee. In addition to the regular meeting schedule established by the committee, the chair of the committee may call a special meeting at any time.
The chair, or in that person’sperson's absence, the vice-chair or in the vice-chair’svice-chair's absence, an alternate designated by the committee, shall:
(a)preside at committee meetings;
(b)ensure that meetings of the committee are held in accordance with this charter; and
(c)review, and modify if necessary the agenda of the meetings of this committee in advance to ensure that the committee may effectively carry out its duties.
203
(a)
preside at committee meetings;
(b)
ensure that meetings of the committee are held in accordance with this charter; and
(c)
review, and modify if necessary the agenda of the meetings of this committee in advance to ensure that the committee may effectively carry out its duties.
A majority of the members of the committee shall constitute a quorum thereof. Every question shall be decided by a majority of the votes cast on the question and in the case of an equality of votes, the chair of the meeting shall be entitled to a second or casting vote.
The committee shall designate its secretary.
Meetings of the committee may be called by any member.
The committee shall act only on the affirmative vote of a majority of the members at a meeting or by unanimous written consent.
The committee may establish subcommittees consisting of one or more members to carry out such duties as the committee may delegate.

4.Committee Activities
The following shall be the common recurring activities of the committee in carrying out its purpose. These activities are set forth as a guide with the understanding that the committee may diverge from this guide as appropriate given the circumstances.
The committee shall:
(a)review, as the committee deems appropriate, the corporation’s capital structure / capital allocation, and its financial policies, practices and strategies, which may include the following:
(a)
review and monitor the effectiveness of the corporation’s programs and practices supporting public awareness and consultation activities.
i.financial outlook and financing plan;
(b)
monitor trends and review current and emerging issues related to government, stakeholder and Indigenous relations.
ii.dividend policies and share repurchase programs;
(c)
review and provide advice on the corporation’s overall community investment strategies and programs, which consists of:
iii.investment of pension assets and the funding of pension obligations;
(i)
charitable contributions;
iv.capital plan including significant capital appropriations;
(ii)
local community contributions by business units on community-serving projects that also benefit the corporation, which are charitable in nature;
v.issuance of equity or debt securities; and
(iii)
funding for public policy groups;
vi.significant investments, acquisitions and divestitures by the corporation, including discussion of possible mergers and other transactions, and their financial impact.
(iv)
university research awards;
(b)require attendances at its meetings by members of management, as the committee may direct.
(v)
sponsorships whose primary purpose is to promote community support and corporate recognition; and
(c)undertake such additional activities within the scope of its responsibilities as it may deem appropriate.
(vi)
expenditures required under socio-economic agreements to support the development of mutually-beneficial long-term relationships.
The committee will make such reports and recommendations to the board with respect thereto as it may deem advisable.

196

(d)
approve all grants or contributions for charitable contributions and local community contributions; as described in section 4(c)(i) above, in excess of $300,000.
(e)
require attendances at its meetings by members of management, as the committee may direct.
(f)
undertake such additional activities within the scope of its responsibilities as it may deem appropriate.
5.Committee Evaluation
The committee will annually complete a self-evaluation of the committee’s own performance and effectiveness and will consider whether any changes to the committee’s charter are appropriate.

6.Resources and Authority of the Committee
The committee has the authority, in its sole discretion, to retain and oversee the work of such outside advisors, including legal counsel, financial advisors or other experts, as it deems appropriate, andappropriate; to approve the fees and expenses of such advisors.
advisors with funding provided by the corporation; and to incur such other ordinary administrative expenses as are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties.
197204