UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152017

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from ______________to ______________

 

Commission File Number001-35898

 

LINDBLAD EXPEDITIONS HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Delaware 27-4749725
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

 

96 Morton Street, 9th Floor, New York, New York 10014
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

 

(212) 261-9000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
   
Warrants, each to purchase one share of Common Stock at an
exercise price of $11.50
 The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitionthe definitions of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer”filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer ☐Accelerated filer ☒
Non-accelerated filer ☐Smaller reporting company☐company ☐
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Emerging growth company ☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

 

As of June 30, 20152017 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $178.7$229.0 million based on its last reportedthe closing sales price of $10.55$10.50 on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.Capital Market.

 

As of March 7, 2016,February 26, 2018, there were 45,505,22845,772,845 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding, par value $0.0001 per share.outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

 

Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 20162018 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III, Items 10-14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K as indicated herein.

 

 

 

 

LINDBLAD EXPEDITIONS HOLDINGS, INC.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

For the year ended December 31, 2017

 

Table of Contents

 

  Page(s)
  
PART I 
  
Item 1.Business1
Item 1A.Risk Factors2015
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments3225
Item 2.Properties3225
Item 3.Legal Proceedings3225
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures3225
   
PART II
  
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related StockholderShareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities3326
Item 6.Selected Financial Data3628
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition andthe Results of Operations and Financial Condition3728
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk4842
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data4942
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure4942
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures4942
Item 9B.Other Information5043
   
PART III
  
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance5144
Item 11.Executive Compensation5144
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related StockholderShareholder Matters5144
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence5144
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services5144
   
PART IV 
  
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules5245
Signatures5548

 

 

 

PART I

 

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

Any statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, prospects, financial condition, assumptions or future events or performance are not historical facts and are “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined under the federal securities laws. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “should,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “expects,” “estimates,” “projects,” “positioned,” “strategy,” “outlook” and similar words. You should read the statements that contain these types of words carefully. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from what is expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. There may be events in the future that we are not able to predict accurately or over which we have no control. Potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

 

 general economic conditions;
unscheduled disruptions in our business due to weather events, mechanical failures, or other events;
changes adversely affecting the business in which we are engaged;
 management of our growth and our ability to execute on our planned growth;
 general economic conditions;
 our business strategy and plans;
 
compliance with laws and regulations,
 compliance with the financial and/or operating covenants in our Second Amended & Restated Credit Agreement;Agreement (“Restated Credit Agreement”);
 adverse publicity regarding the cruise industry in general;
 
loss of business due to competition;
 
the result of future financing efforts;
delays and costs overruns with respect to the construction and delivery of newly constructed vessels;
 the inability to meet revenue and Adjusted EBITDA projections; and
 those risks discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

We urge you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to such forward-looking statements to reflect events or uncertainties after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

 

Unless the context otherwise requires, in this Form 10-K, (i) “Company,” “LEX,“Lindblad,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “ours” refer to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc., the combined company and its subsidiaries following the mergers, (ii) “Capitol” refers Capitol Acquisition Corp. II and its subsidiaries prior to the mergers with Lindblad; and (iii) “Lindblad” refers to Lindblad Expeditions, Inc., a New York corporation, and its subsidiaries prior to the mergers with Capitol.subsidiaries.

Item 1.Business

 

HistoryOverview

 

We were originally incorporated in Delaware on August 9, 2010 with the name Capitol Acquisition Corp. II as a blank check company to acquire, through a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, plan of arrangement, recapitalization, reorganization or other similar business combination, one or more businesses or entities.

On July 8, 2015, we completed a series of mergers whereby Lindblad Expeditions, Inc., a New York corporation, became our wholly-owned subsidiary. As consideration for the mergers, the total purchase price consisted of an aggregate of (i) $90.0 million in cash (a portion of which was paid as transaction bonuses) and (ii) 20,017,787 shares of our common stock. We also assumed outstanding stock options and converted such options into options to purchase an aggregate of 3,821,696 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $1.76 per share.

Immediately following the mergers, we changed our name to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.

1

Overview

We provideprovides expedition cruising and adventure travel experiences. We provideexperiences using itineraries that feature up-close encounters with wildlife, and nature, history and culture, and promote guest empowerment and interactivity. Our mission is offeringto offer life-changing adventures on all seven continents and pioneeringpioneer innovative ways to allow our guests to connect with exotic and remote places.

We currently operate a fleet of six Our expedition ships, which consist of seven owned by our subsidiariesvessels and fourfive seasonal charter vessels. We also have two new 236-foot, 100-passenger cruise vessels, being constructed with delivery expected in the second quarter of 2017 and the second quarter of 2018, respectively, as well as a definitive purchase agreement to acquire a vessel to replace one of our six owned expedition ships. Our expedition ships are customized, nimble and intimately-scaled vessels that are able to venture where larger cruise ships cannot, thus allowing us to offer truly authentic, up-close experiences in the planet’s wild and remote places and capitals of culture. Many of these expeditions involve travel to remote places with limited infrastructure and ports (such as Antarctica and the Arctic) or, including places that are best accessed by a ship (such as the Galápagos, Alaska, Baja’s Sea of Cortez, Costa Rica and Panama), and foster active engagement by guests. Each expedition ship is designed to be comfortable and inviting, while being fully equipped with state-of-the-art tools for in-depth exploration. In addition to our sea-based expeditions, we offer land-based, eco-conscious expeditions from Antarctica to Zambia primarily through our ownership of Natural Habitat, Inc. (“Natural Habitat”).

 

1

We have a strategic business alliancelongstanding relationship with the National Geographic Society, (“National Geographic”)which was founded in 2004 on a shared interest in exploration, research, technology and conservation. This relationship includes a co-selling, co-marketing and branding arrangementarrangements with National Geographic Partners, LLC (“National Geographic”) whereby our owned vessels carry the National Geographic name and National Geographic sells our expeditions through itstheir internal travel division.divisions. We collaborate with National Geographic on voyageexpedition planning to enhance the guest experience by having National Geographic experts, including photographers, writers, marine biologists, naturalists, field researchers and film crews, join our expeditions. Guests have the ability to interface with these experts through lectures, excursions, dining and other experiences throughout their voyage.expedition.

 

Our offerings appeal to a wide range of travelers, both individuals and families, butwith affluent individuals in the U.S. aged 50 years or older representrepresenting our largest segment. By providing suchdemographic category. The quality of our offerings which we work continuously to innovate and further elevate, we have been ablehas enabled us to achieve and maintain premium pricing in the market instead of pursuing the type of discounting in which most large cruise lines that are focused on the broader market engage. Our product offering, value proposition and differentiated pricing approach support ourenable us to achieve high net yields and occupancy rates.

 

Our business benefits from significant visibility into future revenues, as our guests generally plan and book their voyages far in advance of their departure dates. As of March 7, 2016, 85%February 26, 2018, 90% of Lindblad’sthe Lindblad segment’s expected guest ticket revenues for 2016 had2018 have been booked.

We choose to visit geographic areas based upon many factors, including weather, marine conditions, migration patterns and various natural phenomena. In the northern hemisphere summer months, we primarily visit the High Arctic regions of the world, the Canadian Maritimes, Europe, the South Pacific and Alaska. In the northern hemisphere winter months, we primarily travel to Antarctica, South America, Costa Rica, Baja California and the Caribbean. The Galápagos Islands are a year-round destination offering a diverse variety of marine, land and airborne wildlife.

Lindblad Expeditions, Ships and Voyages

Itineraries

Currently we operate a fleet of seven vessels owned and five chartered ships to provide our signature marine-based adventures to over 40 destinations on seven continents of the world. We have extensive experience operating in the Galápagos Islands, Alaska, Antarctica and the Arctic, with the Lindblad family having been among the first to bring non-scientist travelers to these regions. We currently operate two vessels in the Galápagos, providing week-long itineraries throughout the year. We operate two polar vessels that serve in Antarctica during the northern hemisphere winter, in the Arctic during the northern hemisphere summer and various destinations during the intermediate months, offering itineraries that last from five to 24 days. We also operate three ships in Alaska during the summer months that travel south along the U.S. coastline to the Sea of Cortez and to Belize, Guatemala, Costa Rica and Panama for the winter. In addition, we charter five vessels for seasonal itineraries in the Amazon, Scotland, the Caribbean, the Mediterranean, Cuba, Cambodia and Vietnam.

2

We place a strong focus on innovation, which we seek to achieve by introducing new expedition options and continuously making improvements to our fleet and voyage experiences as new technology or operating procedures are developed. We make deployment decisions with the goal of optimizing the overall profitability of our portfolio, with these decisions generally made 18 to 24 months in advance. We have operated above 87% occupancy rate for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, indicating strong consumer interest in our offerings. Adding new capacity will allow us to expand our inventory of existing itineraries and expand into new markets and destinations. The following table presents summary information concerning the ships we currently operate and their geographic areas of operation based on 2017 itineraries:

Vessel Name Date Built Guest Capacity Cabins Primary Areas of Operation Flag
National Geographic Endeavour II 2005, renovated in 2016 95 50 Galápagos Ecuador
National Geographic Explorer 1982, rebuilt in 2008 148 81 Arctic, Antarctica, Europe, British Isles, Canada, Patagonia, South America and Transatlantic Bahamas
National Geographic Islander 1995 47 24 Galápagos Ecuador
National Geographic Orion 2003 102 53 Antarctica, Europe, South America and Arctic Bahamas
National Geographic Quest 2017 96 50 Alaska, Canada, Pacific Northwest, Costa Rica, Panama  U.S.A.
National Geographic Sea Bird 1981 62 31 Alaska, Baja California and Pacific Northwest U.S.A.
National Geographic Sea Lion 1982 62 31 Alaska, Costa Rica, Panama, Baja California and Pacific Northwest U.S.A.
Delfin II* 2009 28 14 Amazon Peru
Harmony V* 2004 44 23 Cuba Greece
Jahan* 2011 48 24 Vietnam and Cambodia Vietnam
Lord of the Glens* 1985, renovated in 2016 48 26 Scotland UK
Sea Cloud* 1931, rebuilt in 1979, renovated in 2011 58 28 Caribbean and Mediterranean Malta

* Chartered Vessel

 The following table presents summary information concerning the two new passenger cruise vessels under construction.

Vessel Name 

Expected Launch

Date

 Guest Capacity Cabins 

Primary Areas of Operation

 Flag
National Geographic Venture December 2018 96 50 West Coast North America and Central America  U.S.A.
Polar Ice Class Vessel January 2020 126 69   Bahamas

3

Owned Vessels

National Geographic Endeavour II operates in the Galápagos. TheNational Geographic Endeavour II joined the fleet in the second quarter of 2016 and, following a significant renovation, deployed during the fourth quarter of 2016. TheNational Geographic Endeavour II accommodates 95 guests in 50 cabins and offers public areas designed for maximum viewing of nature and wildlife.

National Geographic Explorer joined the fleet in 2008 as our ultimate expedition ship. TheNational Geographic Exploreris equipped with an ice-strengthened hull, advanced navigation equipment for polar expeditions and a well-appointed interior with multiple interior and exterior locations specifically designed for observing wildlife and the natural environment. Accordingly, theNational Geographic Explorer is equipped to visit some of the most remote and extreme areas on the planet. TheNational Geographic Explorer accommodates 148 guests in 81 cabins, including 13 cabins with private balconies and six suites. TheNational Geographic Explorer is spacious and modern, with a variety of public areas that offer views of the passing landscape, including a window-lined library and observation lounge located at the top of the ship, several observation decks and a forward-facing chart room.

 

Expedition HeritageNational Geographic Islander is a twin-hulled, yacht-scale ship designed for active exploration. TheNational Geographic Islandersails year-round in the Galápagos, which it is ideally suited for as its trim design and maneuvering abilities enable it to visit areas larger vessels cannot, allowing guests to experience the islands from a more up-close perspective. TheNational Geographic Islander accommodates 47 guests in 24 outside cabins, including two suites. On board there are open decks that are complete with hammocks as well as a large dining room and large lounges thatform part of the social hub of the ship.

National Geographic Orion joined the fleet in 2013. TheNational Geographic Orion is a blue water, ice class vessel, equipped with advanced technology, including large retractable stabilizers, sonar, radar and an ice-strengthened hull, which operates in the Artic, Antarctic, Patagonia and the South Pacific A shallow draft as well as bow and stern thrusters allow for maneuvering close to shore. TheNational Geographic Orion accommodates 102 guests in 53 cabins, including several with balconies and a variety of public spaces that offer panoramic views of the passing landscape. The public rooms include a window-lined main lounge, as well as an observation lounge and library at the top of the ship, with numerous observation decks.

National Geographic Questoperates in the Alaska, the Pacific Northwest and Central America. TheNational Geographic Quest is a new vessel, which joined the fleet during the third quarter of 2017. The vessel was built in the United States to meet the precise needs of our unique expeditions. The ship features the latest satellite communication and navigation technology, designed with superior viewing experiences from the decks and common areas, and is equipped with reinforced Zodiacs. TheNational Geographic Questhas a shallow draft and small size and can reach places inaccessible to larger ships. The vessel accommodates 96 guests in 50 cabins.

National Geographic Sea Bird is the twin ship of theNational Geographic Sea Lion and offers expedition cruises in Alaska, the Pacific Northwest, Baja California and the Sea of Cortez. TheNational Geographic Sea Bird has a shallow draft and small size and can reach places inaccessible to larger ships. TheNational Geographic Sea Bird accommodates 62 guests in 31 outside cabins and has an open bow that provides for shared wildlife viewing experiences.

National Geographic Sea Lion is the twin ship of theNational Geographic Sea Bird and operates in Alaska, the Pacific Northwest, Baja California, the Sea of Cortez, Costa Rica and Panama. TheNational Geographic Sea Lion has a shallow draft and a small size so that it can reach places inaccessible to larger ships. TheNational Geographic Sea Lion accommodates 62 guests in 31 outside cabins and has an open bow that provides for shared wildlife viewing experiences.

Chartered Vessels

Delfin II is a riverboat built to explore the Peruvian Amazon. TheDelfin II accommodates 28 guests in 10 suites and four master suites. The entire third deck is open-air, offering a view of the river and the rainforest. The ship is purpose built to serve the waterways of the Amazon and the ship is decorated with handicrafts from the ribereños, indigenous people of the native wildlife preserves.

Jahanis a riverboat built in 2011 for exploring Vietnam and Cambodia. TheJahan accommodates 48 guests in 24 cabins, including two suites. Every cabin has a private balcony and the suites each have a private Jacuzzi.Jahan has four decks and has several public areas where the expedition community can gather to watch life along the riverbank. The public spaces include a covered, open-air observatory, open bow and a pool on the top deck.

Lord of the Glens is specifically sized to be able to sail through the Caledonian Canal in Scotland, which connects the North Sea to the Atlantic and can navigate the coastline and venture to the islands of the Inner Hebrides. TheLord of the Glens accommodates 48 guests in 26 outside cabins.

4

Harmony V is an expedition vessel used for exploration of the southern coastline and islands of Cuba.  It can accommodate 44 guests in 23 outside cabins.  The ship is fully air-conditioned, has a Sun Deck with an al fresco area that can also be enclosed and used as a venue for presentations and recaps.  The ship is equipped with stabilizers and satellite communications. 

Sea Cloud offers the experience of sailing aboard a fully-rigged ship in the Caribbean and Mediterranean and accommodates 58 guests in 28 outside cabins, including two original owner’s suites that still feature original marble baths and fireplaces. TheSea Cloud has extensive public spaces on the top deck, a dining room that can accommodate all guests at once for single seating and a lounge.

Ship Repair and Maintenance

In addition to routine repairs and maintenance performed on an ongoing basis and in accordance with applicable requirements, each of our expedition ships is taken out of service for a scheduled deeper maintenance period to conduct repairs and improvements. We maintain our fleet in accordance with applicable regulations, international conventions and insurance requirements. This includes regularly scheduled maintenance, periodic inspections, drydocking, wetdocking and overhaul. In addition, renovations and replacements of various vessel elements are part of the ongoing process of maintaining the vessels to a high standard.

For U.S. flagged ships, the statutory requirement is an annual docking and U.S. Coast Guard inspections, normally conducted in drydock. Internationally flagged ships have scheduled dockings approximately every 12 months, for a period of up to three to six weeks. Drydock interval and required inspections are statutory requirements controlled under chapters of the International Convention of the Safety of Life at Seas (“SOLAS”) and Classification Society instructions. Under these regulations, passenger ships must be inspected in drydock twice in five years, with the maximum duration between each drydock inspection not to exceed three years, and an underwater hull inspection is required annually. To the extent practicable each ship’s crew and hotel staff remain with the ship during docking periods and assist in performing repair and maintenance work. We do not earn revenue while ships are in dock. Accordingly, dockings are typically planned during non-peak demand periods to minimize the adverse effect on revenue that results from ships being out of service.

Guest Activities and Services

We provide our guests the opportunity and the tools to be active and engaged explorers. Our vessels carry a variety of equipment for exploration which, depending on the ship and destination, may include Zodiacs for water-based activities and quick transfers to shore, kayaks for personal exploration, motorized skiffs, an underwater camera, a remotely operated vehicle, a video microscope to study some of the smallest organisms of the marine ecosystem, a crow’s nest camera atop a ship’s mast, hydrophones for listening to vocalizations of marine mammals, snorkeling gear, scuba gear and wetsuits. An experienced and knowledgeable expedition staff leads guests in exploration while Zodiac riding, hiking onshore, paddling on the water or observing wildlife from ashore or onboard the ship. All voyages feature a certified photo instructor onboard and many include photographers from National Geographic.

Our ships allow guests to be close to wild nature, but at the same time, enjoy a high level of comfort, convenience and safety. High-quality dining is an integral part of our expedition experience with influences and flavors that reflect the regions being explored, along with traditional fare. Food prepared aboard is sourced locally whenever practicable from sustainable providers. Seating is open and the atmosphere is relaxed. Our ships offer a range of services and amenities which allow our guests to travel in comfort. Depending on the ship, these may include a fitness center, a spa offering a variety of treatments, a photo kiosk for photographers to edit and sort photos, 24-hour beverage service, internet connection, laundry facilities and a doctor on call.

We offer to handle virtually all travel aspects related to guest reservations and transportation, simplifying the planning and booking process for our guests. We also provide guests the opportunity to purchase pre- and post-expedition extensions or services that may include additional hotel nights, air travel, private transfers, excursions, land travel packages and travel protection insurance.

Competitive Strengths

Our management team believes the following characteristics of our business model will enable us to successfully execute our strategy:

Expertise and Name Recognition

 

Our leadership and expertise today isare built on the Lindblad family’s decades of experience in expedition adventure travel. Sven-Olof Lindblad, the founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, comes from a rich expedition heritage. The International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators, which was established in 1991, believes that the concept of expedition cruising, coupled with education as a major theme, began when Lars-Eric Lindblad, Mr.Sven-Olof Lindblad’s father, led the first traveler’s expedition to Antarctica in 1966. Lars-Eric Lindblad has also been recognized byThe New York Times,Travel + LeisureMagazine and other publications for his vision and leadership in developing what is today known as expedition travel. Believing that educated people who saw things with their own eyes would be a potent force for the preservation of the places they visited, Lars-Eric Lindblad worked to promote conservation and restoration projects worldwide. Mr.Sven-Olof Lindblad founded Lindblad in 1979, expanding the legacy of his father by providing expanded marine experiences around the world.

5

 

Under Mr. Lindblad’s leadership, we have led innovation in the expedition adventure travel industry. We pioneered expeditions in the High Arctic and Baja California’s Sea of Cortez and created what we view as the most innovative and in-depth expedition program in Alaska. We initiated the use of kayaks for active exploration in the Polar Regions and in the Galápagos, a feature which is now available on all of our expeditionsowned vessels to enable personal, water-level encounters with nature. We were also one of the first to develop an undersea exploration program as part of a small ship expedition utilizing state-of-the-art equipment and technology.

 

2

Competitive Strengths

Our management team believes the following characteristics of our business model will enable us to successfully execute our strategy:

Expertise and Name Recognition

For over 35 years, we have been offering expedition cruising, known for facilitating guests’ access to interpersonal educational experiences in remote places. As a pioneer in the expedition adventure travel sector, we have established deep expertise and knowledge of operating expedition cruises in extreme locations. We have earned awards and honors from various representatives of the travel industry, including recognition for the quality of our offerings and our support for conservation and sustainable tourism. Some of the awards we have earned are as follows:

 

In 2015, we were awarded the Legacy in Travel Philanthropy Award by Tourism Cares, the charitable arm of the travel and tourism industry, recognizing our longstanding commitment to environmental conservation. We were also named the 2015 World’s Leading Green Cruise Line by the World Travel Awards.

2017 Travel + Leisure World’s Best: Top Small-ship Ocean Cruise Lines
2017 Andrew Harper Grand Award for Best Cruise: Antarctica on National Geographic Explorer 
2017 Andrew Harper Grand Award Staff of the Year:  The staff on National Geographic Explorer
2017 Travvy Award: Best Cruise Line - Expedition/Adventure
2017 Travel Age West Wave Awards:  Best Expedition Cruise Line (ocean-going)
2017 Recommend Magazine’s Readers’ Choice Awards: Best Cruise Line in Expedition Cruises, Silver Award
Conde Nast Traveler 2017 Readers Choice Awards: Top Small Ship Cruise Lines 
2017 Porthole Cruise Readers’ Choice Awards: Best Expedition Cruise Line
2017 Town & Country Travel Cruise Awards: Best Active Itineraries
2017 Cruise Critic Editors’ Picks Award: Best for Adventure 
Afar Magazine’s Travelers’ Choice Cruise Awards: Best Expedition Cruise Lines
USA Today’s 10Best.com Readers’ Choice Awards - Best Adventure Cruise Lines  

Also in 2015,Conde Nast Traveler rated us as one of the Top Small Ship Cruise Lines for the second consecutive year. We have also been named to theTravel + LeisureWorld’s Best List for Small-Ship Cruise Lines six times since 2008.

In 2013, we won theTravel + Leisure Global Vision Award for Leadership. This award recognized travel operators with a focus on extraordinary ways that travelers can give back to the places they visit.

Virtuoso awarded us our Sustainable Tourism Leadership Supplier Award in 2013, an award honoring outstanding leadership and commitment to sustainable tourism principles and practices among Virtuoso suppliers.

 

When customers select an expedition provider for the types of journeys that we offer, we believe that being known as a trusted brand in the market is a significant competitive strength.

 

Compelling Expedition Offerings

 

Our brand is known for delivering voyages that offer in-depth exploration opportunities in locations around the world. Expeditions are operated on intimately-scaled ships with capacities ranging between 28 and 148 guests, fostering a friendly atmosphere on board and extensive interaction between guests, crew and the teams of world classworld-class scientists, naturalists, researchers and photographers that participate in the expeditions. The vessels are nimble and can access locations that are unattainable for large cruise ships, allowing for in-depth exploration itineraries and viewpoints. The ships are customized to provide our signature adventure experiences and activities, such as kayaking among Antarctic icebergs to view penguins or traveling on a Zodiac for an up-close encounter with a whale.

We are continuously focused on maintaining and elevating the guest experience and identifying new opportunities to help people discover the wonders of the world. We believe that our expedition offerings and our track record of innovation represent significant competitive advantages for us.

 

Strong Financial Profile

 

Our business model allows us to generate consistent free cash flow with high revenue visibility. Our guests plan and book their voyagesexpeditions on average nine months in advance, with a deposit due upon booking, providing us insight into future revenue and a source of cash flow. Based on our product offerings, we are able to support premium pricing with minimal discounting and benefit from low requirements for maintenance capital expenditures, minimal working capital needs and favorable tax attributes. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we achieved an Adjusted EBITDA of $46.8 million, $44.6 million and $36.5 million, respectively, which represents a compounded annual growth rate of 13.2% since 2013.

 

We also have a strong cash position, providing us with ample financial flexibility to pursue growth opportunities through investment in new vessels, new charters, tactical land-based products or potential acquisitions of ships or other operators, while still maintaining a prudent capital structure.

 

 36 

Significant Growth Opportunities

 

We believe affluent Americans aged 50 and above defineview their retirement as “a time to travel and explore new places,” favoring travel experiences such as expedition cruising. This has led to strong growth in the specialty cruise segment and we believe these trends will continue. We plan to expand the number of ships in our fleet, including chartered vessels from 10 to 13 over the next several years, and have signedthree years. This includes two contracted vessels, a construction agreement to build two new coastal vessels withvessel and a new polar ice class vessel. The expected deliveries on targetof the first two vessels are scheduled for the secondfourth quarter of 20172018 and 2018,first quarter of 2020, respectively. Additionally, we believe that our platform will beis well positioned to opportunistically seek accretive purchases of operators that lack scale and capital, further extending our growth prospects.

Strategic Alliance with National Geographic

Experienced Management Team

 

We are led bybenefit from a management team comprisedlongstanding relationship with the National Geographic Society, one of individuals drawingthe world’s leading proponents of eco-tourism and natural history. The strategic alliance, which began in 2004, is built on our shared interest in exploration, research, technology and conservation. Founded in 1888, the National Geographic Society is one of the largest non-profit scientific and educational institutions in the world with interests ranging from geography, archaeology and natural science, to the promotion of environmental and historical conservation. Working to inspire, illuminate and teach, National Geographic reaches more than 600 million people a diversemonth through a wide range of media, including print, TV and digital. The National Geographic name has significant value for use in connection with travel-related goods and services. The Lindblad/National Geographic alliance includes a co-selling and co-marketing arrangement through which National Geographic promotes our offerings in its marketing campaigns across web-based, email, print and other marketing platforms and sells our expeditions through its internal travel division. The National Geographic sales channel represented approximately 25% of our guest ticket revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017. We believe that the alliance with National Geographic provides us with a substantial competitive advantage in the expedition market based on the brand enhancement, expanded marketing reach and the relationship with National Geographic’s naturalists and photographers.

Through this alliance, we collaborate with National Geographic on exploration, research, technology and conservation in order to provide travel experiences and disseminate geographic knowledge basearound the globe. The Lindblad/National Geographic alliance is set forth in an Alliance and skill sets acquired through extensive experience in expedition cruisingLicense Agreement and adventure travel. Mr.a Tour Operator Agreement with terms until December 31, 2025.

Sven-Olof Lindblad, our founder, Presidentalso serves on the National Geographic Society’s International Council of Advisors, which is composed of individuals identified by the National Geographic Society as visionary leaders from a range of professions and industries across the globe that exemplify the intellectual curiosity and quest for adventure that has driven the National Geographic Society’s mission since 1888. Mr. John M. Fahey, Jr., one of our directors, previously served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer who has decades of experience in the sector, built the Company up to our current fleet of six owned and four chartered vessels while carefully establishing the values and brand for which we are now known. Ian T. Rogers, our Chief Operating Officer, joined us in 2009 and has over 25 years of hospitality and cruise experience. John T. McClain, our Chief Financial Officer, joined us in 2015 and brings a long history of leadership positions in a wide range of public companies. Overall, the members of our senior management team have many years of experience in the maritime, adventure, marketing and hospitality sectors.

Executive Officers of the Company

As of March 7, 2016, our executive officers are as follows:

NameAgePosition
Sven-Olof Lindblad65

Chief Executive Officer and President

Ian T. Rogers51Chief Operating Officer, Vice President and Treasurer
John T. McClain54

Chief Financial Officer 

Dean (Trey) Byus III47Chief Expedition Officer
Richard P. Fontaine51Chief Marketing Officer
J. Tyler Skarda51Senior Vice President, Fleet Operations

Sven-Olof Lindbladfounded Lindblad and has been its President and Chief Executive Officer since its inception. Mr. Lindblad’s travel background and familiarity with adventure-travel and wildlife dates back to his childhood and his extensive travels with his father, Lars-Eric Lindblad. Mr. Lindblad founded Lindblad in order to offer innovative and educational travel expeditions to the world’s most remarkable places, capturing the true spirit of adventure. In May 2006, Mr. Lindblad received international recognition for his model of tourism in a ceremony hosted by HRH, Grand Duke Henri of Luxembourg at the Grand-Ducal Palace. In addition, a newly discovered endemic species of moth in the Galápagos Islands, Undulambia lindbladi, has been named in honor of Mr. Lindblad. Mr. Lindblad is an honorary member of the General Assembly of the Charles Darwin Foundation for the Galápagos Islands; serves on the Board of The Safina Center and on the National Geographic Council of Advisors; is commissioner of the Aspen Institute’s Commission on Arctic Climate Change; is a founding member of the non-profit organization, Ocean Elders, which brings together global leaders to pursue the protection of the ocean’s habitat and wildlife; and serves on the Board of Advisors for Pristine Seas.Society.

 

Ian T. RogersNatural Habitat, Inc. joined Lindblad in the spring of 2009 as its Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and in 2014 his role expanded to also include the positions of Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. In connection with the appointment of John T. McClain as our Chief Financial Officer in November 2015, Mr. Rogers ceased serving as our Chief Financial Officer at such time. During 2008, Mr. Rogers served as an independent financial consultant to Lindblad. Mr. Rogers served as Chief Financial Officer for E Suites Hotels, LLC from 2007 to 2008 and was Chief Financial Officer of Tauck World Discovery from 2006 to 2007. From 1992 to 2006 Mr. Rogers was Senior Director of Finance, Vice President of Finance and Divisional CFO of Carlson Hotels Worldwide (Carlson Companies). Mr. Rogers has broad experience in hotel, travel, leisure and cruise businesses in the U.S., Eastern Europe, the Caribbean and the Middle East. Mr. Rogers holds an M.B.A. from the University of Minnesota and a B.S. in Hospitality Management from the University of Bournemouth, UK. 

 

4

John T. McClainjoined us as Chief Financial OfficerOn May 4, 2016, we acquired an 80.1% ownership interest in November 2015. Mr. McClain previously served asNatural Habitat, an adventure travel, land-based, ecotourism company located in Colorado. Natural Habitat offers over 80 different itineraries in more than 30 countries spanning seven continents. Natural Habitat focuses on small groups led by award-winning naturalists to achieve close-up wildlife and nature experiences. Examples of expeditions offered by Natural Habitat include safaris in Botswana, grizzly bear adventures in Alaska and polar bear tours in Canada and many of Natural Habitat’s expeditions feature access to private wildlife reserves, remote corners of national parks and distinctive lodges and camps for the Chief Financial Officerbest wildlife viewing. The smallest expeditions average between eight to nine guests with itineraries running from six to 25 days, with an average of The Jones Group Inc., a leading global designer, marketer and wholesaler of over 25 brands, from July 2007 until the sale of the company to Sycamore Partners in April 2014. From April 2014 to August 2014, he continued to provide Senior Advisor services related to financial operations to The Jones Group Inc. Mr. McClain has served on the board of Nine West Holdings from April 2014 through October 2015, the board and audit committee of Lands’ End since May 2014 and as a trustee of Seritage Growth Properties since June 2015. Mr. McClain has also held a number of roles at Avis Budget Group, Inc. formerly Cendant Corporation. He joined Cendant Corporation in September 1999, serving as the Senior Vice President, Finance & Corporate Controller until 2006. From July 2006 to 2007, Mr. McClain served as the Chief Accounting Officer of Avis and Chief Operating Officer of Cendant Finance Holdings. Mr. McClain previously held leadership roles at Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. and ITT Corporation. Mr. McClain holds a B.S. in Accounting from Lehigh University.

Dean (Trey) Byus III joined Lindblad in 1993 as an Expedition Leader and since 2009 has served as Lindblad’s Chief Expedition Officer, overseeing programming for Lindblad’s vessels. Prior to 2009, Mr. Byus served as Lindblad’s Vice President of Operations and Program Development, Director of Field Staff & Expedition Technology, Director of Field Staff and Expedition Leader. Mr. Byus has worked in regions around the world and has extensive experience in managing Lindblad’s naturalists, historians, Expedition Leaders, vessel itineraries and business development, including working with National Geographic. Mr. Byus holds a B.A. from the University of Washington.10 days.

 

Richard P. Fontainejoined Lindblad as Chief Marketing OfficerNatural Habitat has partnered with World Wildlife Fund (“WWF”), since 2003 to promote sustainable conservation travel that directly promotes and protects nature. WWF is one of the world’s leading conservation groups with over six million members globally. Natural Habitat’s exclusive license agreement with WWF allows Natural Habitat to use the WWF name and logo through 2023 in July 2013, and oversees all marketing and sales initiatives, including public relations, communications and corporate brand positioning efforts. Mr. Fontaine brings more than 25 years of experience in consumer-direct marketingreturn for highly-regarded lifestyle media and merchandising brands. From February 1997 until July 2013, Mr. Fontaine served as SVP, Consumer Marketing for Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. (MSLO). Previously, Mr. Fontaine served in product management/marketing roles at Time Inc./Sports Illustrated, and MBI, Inc./The Danbury Mint. Mr. Fontaine holds a B.A. in Economics from Cornell University.royalty fee.

 

J. TylerSkarda joined us as Senior Vice President, Marine Operations in January 2016 and oversees our marine operations and marine fixed assets. Mr. Skarda brings over two decades of maritime industry experience, focused on strategy, capital equipment procurement cost reduction, and shipbuilding/ship operations process improvement for global maritime companies and their suppliers. Prior to joining us, Mr. Skarda served as a consultant with the leading global management consulting firm, A.T. Kearney. Mr. Skarda started his career in the United States Navy and later worked in the Office of the Secretary of Defense as a senior maritime industry analyst prior to leaving the service.Mr. Skarda holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from California State University, Sacramento and an M.B.A. from the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University.

Industry and Market

 

We believe the specialty and small ship cruising segment of the cruise industry demonstrates the following positive fundamentals:

Favorable Characteristics of Cruise Industry

Cruising is a vacation alternative with broad appeal, as it offers a wide range of products, destinations and experiences to suit the preferences of vacationing consumers of all ages, wealth levels and nationalities. The multi-night global cruise industry is predominantly made up of large ships of over 1,000 berths with per diem pricing of $100 to $250 per person, which is designed to reach a mass market audience. This market segment has grown significantly but still remains relatively small compared to the broader global vacation industry, reflecting significant room for growth. According to the Global Economic Contribution of Cruise Tourism 2014 by Business Research & Economic Advisors, published in October 2015, the cruise industry has experienced steady growth over the past 30 years. Between 2004 and 2014, demand for cruising worldwide increased from 13.1 million passengers to 22.0 million passengers, an increase of 68%, whereas over a similar period, global tourism has only risen by 45%. According to a Cruise Lines International Association (“CLIA”) 2015 State of the Cruise Industry Report and a STR Global census database, there were about 482,000 beds in the global cruise industry in 2014, which is less than 4% of the number of worldwide hotel rooms as of December 2015. Cruising is considered a well-established vacation sector in the North American market, a growing sector over the long-term in the European market and a developing but promising sector in several other markets.

 

 57 

Strong Growth in Specialty and Small Ship Cruising Segment

 

The specialty and small ship cruising segment of the cruise industry is characterized by the smallest vessel size, unique itineraries, active adventures, gourmet culinary programs, highly personalized service and a more inclusive offering. These exclusive attributes, combined with limited supply growth and a growing worldwide target population, provide specialty and small ship cruising operators with significant pricing leverage as compared to the other segments of the cruise industry.

 

The specialty cruise segment has demonstrated strong growth as consumers increasingly prefer experiences over other forms of discretionary spending. According to CLIA,Cruise Lines International Association (“CLIA”), specialty cruises grew by 21% annually from 2009 to 2014. In a December 20152016 survey of CLIA-member travel agents, 83% expect75% expected increased bookings in 20162017 from the prior year, with 40%33% of the agents anticipating growth of 10% or greater. Despite this consistent growth, we believe the specialty cruise industry still has low penetration levels compared to similar land-based vacations, which we believe highlights the continued growth potential for the specialty cruise market.

 

The specialty cruise segment includes expeditions to destinations around the world, such as those included in our itineraries. This sub-segment also benefits from positive growth of the broader adventure travel industry. Adventure travel grew 65% year-over-year from 2009 to 2012 into a $263 billion industry, according to the 2013 Adventure Tourism Market Study conducted by George Washington University and the Adventure Travel Trade Association. This growth was partly attributed to a 59% increase in the appeal of adventure trips, and a 60% increase in average spending per adventure trip, driven partly by an increase in the average trip length from seven days in 2009 to nine days in 2012.

Attractive Target Market Demographics

 

Our offerings appeal to a wide range of travelers, both individuals and families, but affluent individuals in the U.S. aged 50 years or older represent our largest segment.demographic category. We believe that our small ship expedition offerings, with itineraries that promote up-close encounters with wildlife, nature and culture, have significant appeal to this target market. These individuals are also generally near-retirement or retired and have the leisure time and disposable income available to pursue the type of activities that we provide. Based on the U.S. Census Bureau’s 20142015 National Projections, the age group of 4550 years and older numbered approximately 130111 million individuals in 2014,2015, or approximately 41%35% of the U.S. population, and is expected to grow to approximately 140120 million in 2020, an increase of approximately 8%. In comparison, over the same time period the age group of 18 years and younger is projected to increase by approximately 1% and the age group of 18 year to 44 years is projected to increase by approximately 4%.

 

High Barriers to Entry

 

The adventure travel and specialty cruise industries in which we operate are characterized by high barriers to entry, which include the expertise and experience required to operate safely and effectively in remote locations, the existence of well-established and trusted brands, the time and personal relationships required to develop strong networks of experts to lead and support expeditions, the cost and time required to build the strong travel agent network partnerships necessary for success, local permits or licenses required to operate in a diverse range of geographies, large capital expenditures and operational insight required to build new and sophisticated ships suited for such specialized activities.

 

Competition

We compete with a number of cruise lines with competition varying by destination. The growthmarket is fragmented and primarily comprised of private operators. The primary competitors that operate in the geographic regions we serve include Silversea Expeditions, Quark Expeditions, Compagnie du Ponant, Hurtigruten and Un-Cruise Adventures. For our land-based expeditions, we compete with a variety of companies offering itineraries in the countries in which we operate. These range from small private operators to larger companies operating across multiple countries. Some of our larger competitors include Abercrombie & Kent, Overseas Adventure Travel and GeoEx. We also compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for guests’ leisure time. Companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending.

The cruise industry depends, however, on consumers’ discretionary spending,in general and in the event that consumers’ disposable income or consumer confidence decreases asexpedition cruise industry specifically are characterized by high barriers to entry, including the existence of several established and recognizable brands, the large investment required to build a result of an economic downturn or other factors, demand for cruises could decrease. See “Risk Factors – Risks Relatednew, sophisticated ship, the long lead time necessary to Our Businessconstruct new ships and Operations – Adverse worldwide economic, geopolitical or other conditions could reduce the demand for expedition cruises and adversely impact our operating results, cash flows and financial condition, including potentially impairing the value of our fleet and other assets.”limited newbuild shipyard capacity.

 

6

Business and Growth Strategies

 

The following are the key components of our business strategy:

 

Deliver Exceptional Guest Experiences

 

Our chief governing principle throughout the organization is to ensure that everything adds value to the guest experience. This applies to every step of the process from the first engagement with a potential guest, through the booking process and travel preparations, the actual expedition, whether onboard the vessel or off on explorations, and once back at home.

 

We believe that our guests do not want to be passive tourists, so our expeditions foster active engagement. Our ships are equipped with tools for exploration to get our guests out in the open for up-close forays, or to let guests see deeper into the marine or terrestrial environments surrounding them. It is our goal to provide guests with differentiated opportunities such as watchingwith an experienced expedition team that adds to the guests’ understanding and appreciation, through dedicated observation, insightful commentary and engaging presentations, weaving the expedition into a cohesive narrative. This could include an opportunity for the guest to watch a killer whale circling a seal on an ice flow,floe, while standing next to a marine biologist and an experienced nature photographer from National Geographic. An experienced expedition team adds to the guests’ understanding and appreciation, through dedicated observation, insightful commentary and engaging presentations that weave the expedition into a cohesive narrative. This intense focus on seeking to elevate the overall experience and engaging with guests has resulted in highly favorable customer feedback, as collected by us and as reflected in the numerous industry honors we have received.feedback. We believe that by consistently delivering exceptional experiences to our guests, we have built a highly valuable and trusted brand in the expedition cruising and land-based expedition market, which attracts a growing number of customers, and in particular, discerning and affluent guests who are prepared to pay a premium for our offerings.

8

High Visibility and Differentiated Revenue Management Strategy

Given the nature of our expeditions and the expectation that our guests will seek to plan such trips with substantial notice, we begin to market our voyages approximately 12 to 1824 months in advance of the departure date, depending on the destination. Guests book their trips, on average, nine months prior to sail date, paying a deposit at booking and the final payment 60 to 120 days within the date of travel, dependent upon the selected voyage. As of February 26, 2018, 90% of the Lindblad segment’s expected guest ticket revenues for 2018 has been booked. 

Unlike the large cruise line operators that serve the broader market, our product offering is inclusive of most costs and therefore the advance customer payments provide us strong visibility into future revenues and the associated cash flows. By having such visibility ofinto future business, we can more effectively manage any additional sales and marketing efforts that may be required to ensure that the programs reach their targeted occupancy levels. We do not believe in driving participation through discounting and do not generally pursue such strategies. Instead, we focus on voyage enhancements that add significant value to the product without muchsignificant incremental cost, as well as targeted marketing efforts in order to strengthen occupancy rates, if required. Based on our offerings, the targeted audience and premium pricing, our guests are generally older, more affluent and do not travel with three or four individuals in one cabin. As it is industry convention to base 100% occupancy on two persons per cabin, we may report occupancy levels that are somewhat lower than the large cruise lines serving the broader market. However, the occupancy statistics nevertheless reflect appropriately that we are operating close to full occupancy. We have achieved strong occupancy rates for the Lindblad segment in the last three years (based on two persons per cabin), specifically 91.8% in 2015, 92.9% in 2014operating at above 87% occupancy rate for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 92.4% in 2013. As of March 7, 2016, 85% of our expected guest ticket revenues for 2016 had been booked.2015.

 

Maximize and Grow Net Yields

 

We have historically achieved high net yields and continue to see opportunities for growth. Net yield is a frequently referenced metric used in the cruise industry and refers to tour revenues net of commissions and certain direct costs in a specific period divided by the number of available guest nights. Our net yields are driven by our offerings, premium pricing and ancillary guest revenue, such as pre- or post-voyage trip extensions, add-on optional activities, trip insurance and onboard spend, including spa services and alcoholic beverages. Our net yields were $985, $976 and $971 $950in 2017, 2016 and $931 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. TheseFurthermore, our historical net yield amounts reflect annual growth rates of 2.2% from 2014 to 2015 and 2.0% from 2013 to 2014. Furthermore, while our use of net yield may not be comparable to companies in the industry, our net yield in 2015 washas been significantly higher than the large scale cruise line operators. We expect to be able to continue our track record of maintaining strong pricing and growing ancillary guest revenues through increased sales focus and marketing efforts, particularly of pre- and post-voyage extensions on which we have not historically placed significant emphasis.

 

7

Elevate Brand Awareness and Loyalty

 

Our brand is recognizable by our guests primarily due to our heritage, decades of sales and marketing investment and long-standinglongstanding strategic alliance with National Geographic. We believe we have fostered strong guest and brand loyalty, which is evidenced by our high levels of repeat guests. In 2015, 37%2017, 41% of guests booked through our U.S. office were past guests. We have closely aligned our marketing efforts with National Geographic to maximize impact in the marketplace and have engaged in a co-branding strategy with respect to our owned vessels. In addition, we are recognized as a leader in promoting the issue of conservation of the planet and encourage our guests to become engaged through the Lindblad Expeditions – National Geographic Joint Fund for Exploration and Conservation (“LEX-NG Fund”). In the past, we have organized high levelhigh-level meetings in the Arctic, Antarctic, Galápagos and Baja California to put a spotlight on key environmental issues in conjunction with organizations such as the Aspen Institute, TED and the World Wildlife Fund.WWF. These efforts help to build our brand and network of relationships and enhance our thought leadership. We will continue to focus on ensuring that each of our guests associates our brand with high-quality overseasmarine based adventure vacation experiences.

We source our business through a combination of direct selling, travel agency networks and our strategic alliance with National Geographic. We invest in maintaining strong relationships with our key travel agency network partners and seek to maintain commission rates and incentive structures that are competitive within the marketplace.

The National Geographic relationship also serves as a channel for bookings. Our alliance with National Geographic includes a co-selling and co-marketing arrangement through which National Geographic promotes our offerings in its marketing campaigns across web-based, email, print and other marketing platforms and sells our expeditions through its internal travel divisions. The National Geographic channel represented approximately 25%, 27% and 24% of guest ticket revenues for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

9

We maintain an active presence on numerous social media platforms, focusing primarily on those with the greatest reach to our target demographic. In addition, we routinely feed content to National Geographic’s social media platforms, which extend the reach of our brand significantly.

 

Disciplined Expansion

 

We are focused on growing our business in a prudent and disciplined manner. When evaluating various strategies for expansion of guest capacity, we consider closely the expected return on invested capital and the range of possibilities, such as a newbuild program, adding selected charters and the acquisitions of existing ships or small operators, such as the 2013 acquisition of Fillmore Pearl Holdings Ltd. and its subsidiaries, including the owner of the vessel that was subsequently named National Geographic Orion.operators. We currently have twoa new coastal vessels on ordervessel under construction scheduled for delivery in 20172018 and 2018, respectively.a new polar ice class vessel under construction scheduled for delivery in 2020. We also have options for two additional polar ice class vessels. We believe that we have ample capital and financial flexibility to fund this investment and management considers it to be an important step to meet increasing demand for our offerings.

Strategic Alliance with National Geographic

 

We benefit from a strategic alliance with National Geographic, one of the world’s leading proponents of eco-tourism and natural history. The strategic alliance, which began in 2004, is built on our shared interest in exploration, research, technology, and conservation. Since 1888, National Geographic has enabled people to explore the world through its magazines and, more recently, its television programs, website and social media. It is one of the largest non-profit scientific and educational institutions in the world with interests ranging from geography, archaeology and natural science, to the promotion of environmental and historical conservation. Working to inspire, illuminate and teach, National Geographic reaches more than 600 million people a month through a wide range of media, including print, TV and digital. The National Geographic name has significant value for use in connection with travel-related goods and services. The Lindblad/National Geographic alliance includes a co-selling and co-marketing arrangement through which National Geographic promotes our offerings in its marketing campaigns across web-based, email, print, and other marketing platforms and sells our expeditions through its internal travel division. The National Geographic sales channel represents approximately 24% of our guest ticket revenues. We believe that the alliance with National Geographic provides us with a substantial competitive advantage in the expedition market based on the brand enhancement, expanded marketing reach and the relationship with National Geographic’s naturalists and photographers.Operations

Through this alliance, we collaborate with National Geographic on exploration, research, technology, and conservation in order to provide travel experiences and disseminate geographic knowledge around the globe. The Lindblad/National Geographic alliance is set forth in (i) an Alliance and License Agreement and (ii) a Tour Operator Agreement.

8

Alliance and License Agreement. Pursuant to the Alliance and License Agreement, we and National Geographic have agreed to collaborate to identify key destinations and program enhancements as well as to develop marketing strategies, joint loyalty programs and materials for our expeditions in exchange for royalty payments from us. The royalty amount is calculated based upon a percentage of ticket revenue less travel agent commission, including the revenue received from cancellation fees and any revenue received for the sale of voyage extensions. As part of the agreement, National Geographic has granted us a (i) non-exclusive license to use certain licensed property (including licensed content and licensed marks, which include but are not limited to National Geographic’s name and images) for the advertising and promotion of certain expeditions in the U.S., its territories and possessions, Australia and New Zealand (the “Territory”) and (ii) a non-exclusive license to use the licensed property in association with our name, trademarks, services marks, and logos in connection with promotional and public relations communications in the Territory relating to certain expeditions to destinations worldwide. The agreement also provides us with a non-exclusive, non-transferable right and license to use the National Geographic marketing database for the purpose of promoting the sale of such expeditions.

The agreement includes a branding arrangement whereby our six owned and operated expedition cruise ships carry the National Geographic name. The names of the National Geographic branded vessels areNational Geographic Orion, National Geographic Explorer, National Geographic Endeavour, National Geographic Islander, National Geographic Sea Lion, and National Geographic Sea Bird. We have the right to brand each future vessel we acquire under the name “National Geographic.” In addition, the agreement provides for us to use co-branded materials to showcase National Geographic as an institution on all of our National Geographic branded ships and on certain other Lindblad ships.

The agreement also provides us with access to the experts affiliated with National Geographic, including world-renowned scientists, researchers, explorers, and photographers, who participate in our voyages and provide guests, while onboard, with lectures, excursions and informal interactions. We are required to pay a stipend to National Geographic experts on a Lindblad expedition. The agreement also requires us to designate one of our employees as the National Geographic representative and to pay National Geographic 50% and 25%, respectively, of the total compensation for two employees of National Geographic that manage our relationship. Pursuant to the agreement, we are responsible for the development, administration and operation of all voyages as well as all associated expenses, including but not limited to hiring, managing and paying qualified staff.

As part of the agreement, we agreed not to enter into any agreements with Discovery Communications, Inc. or their affiliates other than with respect to the purchase of advertising media or the license of film, video or other items and National Geographic agreed not to license its marks or content to competitive cruise ships marketed within the U.S. Each party also agreed to a standard indemnification clause for negligent acts or breaches of representations and warranties in the agreement.

Each party may terminate the agreement for breaches that are not cured timely. In addition, each party may terminate the agreement if the year-on-year net revenue growth realized by us for our cruise expeditions is less than a specified percentage, provided that any exercise of such termination right is limited to the 30-day period following delivery of year-end results and is subject to 18 months prior notice. National Geographic also has the right to terminate the agreement in the event of a change of control of our company.

The agreement further provides for the support of the LEX-NG Fund administered by National Geographic. The LEX-NG Fund identifies and articulates to our guests regional issues in conservation, education, research, and community development that require financial support. In 2015, nine key areas were supported with an aggregate amount of $1.4 million. The majority of funds were donated by guests traveling aboard our fleet; National Geographic also contributed 10% of royalty payments we made to National Geographic. In some instances, matching funds have been negotiated with third parties. In connection with the merger of Lindblad and Capitol, the stockholders of Capitol prior to its initial public offering – Capitol Acquisition Management 2 LLC, L. Dyson Dryden, Lawrence Calcano, Richard C. Donaldson, and Piyush Sodha – collectively made a charitable contribution of an aggregate of 500,000 founder’s shares in Capitol to the LEX-NG Fund for no additional consideration. The LEX-NG Fund is managed jointly by one of our staff members and a National Geographic staff member, and the Board is currently comprised of four members, including Sven-Olof Lindblad, the founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc., and Terry Garcia, Chief Science and Exploration Officer of National Geographic Society.

Tour Operator Agreement. Pursuant to the Tour Operator Agreement, we are the exclusive provider of ocean-going ships to National Geographic marketed in the U.S., its territories and possessions, including Puerto Rico, subject to certain exceptions. For National Geographic trips that we operate, National Geographic will market the trips under the “National Geographic Expeditions” mark and, at its own cost, is responsible for product selection, marketing and providing its own experts while we, at our own cost, are responsible for the trip itinerary and operations, marketing support, staffing, customer service, administrative operations, fare collections, and other operations on the trip. As part of the agreement, we are required to pay fees to National Geographic as a percentage of the price charged to guests. Pursuant to the agreement, National Geographic granted us a license to use its trademarks in connection with the marketing of National Geographic trips. Each party may terminate the agreement for breaches of the agreement that are not cured timely. Each party also agreed to a standard indemnification clause for negligent acts.

9

Amendments to Alliance and License Agreements and Tour Operator Agreement in connection with the Mergers. We entered into amendments with National Geographic dated as of March 9, 2015 to each of the agreements to extend the expiration date of each agreement from December 31, 2017 until December 31, 2025 and reaffirm the continued effectiveness of the agreements notwithstanding the mergers with Capitol. The amendment to the Alliance and License Agreement also provides that we have the right to brand each vessel acquired in the future under the name “National Geographic.

In connection with the merger on July 8, 2015, the Company, Mr. Lindblad and National Geographic entered into a Call Option agreement where Mr. Lindblad agreed to grant National Geographic an option to purchase 2,387,499 of Mr. Lindblad’s shares in the Company as consideration for the assumption of the Alliance and License agreements and the Tour Operator agreement (see Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies for more details).

Mr. Lindblad also serves on National Geographic’s International Council of Advisors, which is composed of individuals identified by National Geographic as visionary leaders from a range of professions and industries across the globe that exemplify the intellectual curiosity and quest for adventure that has driven National Geographic’s mission since 1888. Mr. John M. Fahey, Jr., one of our directors, previously served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of National Geographic.

Expedition Ships and Voyages

 

Itineraries

As of March7, 2016, we operated a fleet of six expedition vessels owned through our subsidiaries and four chartered ships to provide our signature marine-based adventures to over 40 destinations along all seven continents of the world. We have extensive experience operating in the Galápagos Islands, Antarctica and the Arctic, with the Lindblad family having been among the first to bring non-scientist travelers to these regions. We currently operate two vessels in the Galápagos, providing week-long itineraries throughout the year. We operate two pole-to-pole vessels that serve in Antarctica during the northern hemisphere winter, in the Arctic during the summer and various destinations during the intermediate months, offering itineraries that last from five to 24 days. We also run two ships in Alaska during the summer months that travel south along the U.S. coastline to the Sea of Cortez and to Costa Rica and Panama for the winter. In addition, we charter four vessels for seasonal itineraries in the Amazon, Scotland, the Caribbean, the Mediterranean, Cambodia, and Vietnam.

We place a strong focus on innovation, which we seek to achieve by introducing new expedition options and continuously making improvements to our fleet and voyage experiences as new technology or operating procedures are developed. We make deployment decisions with the goal of optimizing the overall profitability of our portfolio, with these decisions generally made 18 to 24 months in advance. We have operated at a 91.8% occupancy rate in the year ended December 31, 2015, 92.9% in 2014 and 92.4% in 2013, indicating strong consumer interest in our offerings. Adding new capacity will allow us to expand our inventory of existing itineraries and expand into new markets and destinations. The following table presents summary information concerning the ships we currently operate and their geographic areas of operation based on 2016 itineraries:

Vessel Name Date Built Guest
Capacity
  Cabins  Primary Areas of
Operation
 Flag
National Geographic Explorer 1982, rebuilt in 2008  148   81  Arctic, Antarctica, Azores, British Isles, Canada, Patagonia, South America and Transatlantic Bahamas
National Geographic Orion 2003  102   53  Antarctica, Europe and Arctic Bahamas
National Geographic Endeavour 1966  95   56  Galápagos Ecuador
National Geographic Islander 1995  47   24  Galápagos Ecuador
National Geographic Sea Bird 1981  62   31  Alaska, Baja California and Pacific Northwest U.S.A.
National Geographic Sea Lion 1982  62   31  Alaska, Costa Rica, Panama and Pacific Northwest U.S.A.
Delfin II** 2009  28   14  Amazon Peru
Jahan** 2011  48   24  Vietnam and Cambodia Vietnam
Lord of the Glens** 1985  48   26  Scotland UK
Sea Cloud** 1931  58   28  Caribbean and Mediterranean Malta

**Chartered Vessel.

10

The following table presents summary information concerning the two new passenger cruise vessels being constructed with delivery expected in the second quarter of 2017 and the second quarter of 2018, respectively, as well as theVia Australis that we expect to take possession of in the second quarter of 2016, renovate and deploy as a replacement of theNational Geographic Endeavour in the fourth quarter of 2016.

Vessel Name Date Built Guest
Capacity
  Cabins  Primary Areas of
Operation
 Flag
Via Australis 2005  95   50  Galápagos Chile/Ecuador*
US Newbuild Hull S188 2017  100   50  West Coast North America and Central America U.S.A
US Newbuild Hull S189 2018  100   50  West Coast North America and Central America U.S.A.

*TheVia Australis is flagged by its current owner in Chile. Registration and flagging in Ecuador will take place upon completion of the acquisition and the vessel is put in service.

Owned Vessels

National Geographic Explorer, our flagship vessel, joined the fleet in 2008 as our ultimate expedition ship. TheExploreris equipped with an ice-strengthened hull, advanced navigation equipment for polar expeditions and a well-appointed interior with numerous windows for viewing nature. Accordingly, theExplorer is equipped to visit some of the most remote and extreme areas on the planet. TheExplorer accommodates 148 guests in 81 cabins, including 13 cabins with private balconies and six suites. TheExplorer is spacious and modern, with a variety of public areas that offer views of the passing landscape, including a window-lined library and observation lounge located at the top of the ship, several observation decks and a forward-facing chart room.

National Geographic Orion was designed and built in Germany in 2003 and was substantially enhanced in 2013 upon joining our fleet. TheOrion is designed to be self-sufficient for expedition travel with operations focused in Antarctica, Europe and the Arctic. Engineered with comfort and safety in mind, theOrion is a blue water, ice class vessel equipped with advanced technology, including large retractable stabilizers, sonar, radar and an ice-strengthened hull. A shallow draft as well as bow and stern thrusters allow for maneuvering close to shore. TheOrionaccommodates 102 guests in 53 cabins, including several with balconies and a variety of public spaces that offer panoramic views of the passing landscape. The public rooms include a window-lined main lounge, as well as an observation lounge and library at the top of the ship, with numerous observation decks.

11

National Geographic Endeavour operates year-round in the Galápagos. Prior to its post to warm equatorial waters, theEndeavourvoyaged from pole-to-pole with extensive periods in the icy waters of the Arctic and Antarctic. TheEndeavour accommodates 95 guests in 56 outside cabins, including two suites, and offers comfortable public areas and extensive open deck space. TheVia Australisis expected to join the fleet in the second quarter of 2016 and, following a significant renovation, is expected to be deployed during the fourth quarter of 2016. TheVia Australis will replace theNational Geographic Endeavour and will operate in the Galápagos. TheVia Australisaccommodates 95 guests in 50 cabins and offers public areas designed for maximum viewing with quick, easy access to decks to respond to bridge announcements of phenomenal sightings of nature and wildlife.

National Geographic Islander is a twin-hulled, yacht-scale ship designed for active exploration. TheIslanderwas originally built for service in the Caribbean, and then later used for expeditions in the Scottish Highlands. Since 2004, theIslander has been sailing year-round in the Galápagos, which it is ideally suited for as its trim design and maneuvering abilities enable it to visit areas larger vessels cannot, allowing guests to experience the islands from a more up-close perspective. TheIslanderaccommodates 47 guests in 24 outside cabins, including two suites. On board there are open decks that are complete with hammocks as well as a large dining room and large lounges that form part of the social hub of the ship.

National Geographic Sea Bird is the twin ship of theSea Lion and offers expedition cruises in Alaska, the Pacific Northwest, Baja California and the Sea of Cortez. TheSea Bird has a shallow draft and small size and can reach places inaccessible to larger ships. TheSea Bird accommodates 62 guests in 31 outside cabins.

National Geographic Sea Lion is the twin ship of theSea Bird and operates in Alaska, the Pacific Northwest, Baja California, the Sea of Cortez, Costa Rica, and Panama. TheSea Lion has a shallow draft and a small size so that it can reach places inaccessible to larger ships. TheSea Lion accommodates 62 guests in 31 outside cabins and has an open bow that provides for shared wildlife viewing experiences.

Chartered Vessels

Delfin II is a riverboat recently built to explore the Peruvian Amazon.Delfin II accommodates 28 guests in 10 suites and four master suites. The entire third deck is open-air, offering a view of the river and the rainforest. Furnishings are made of harvested local rain forest wood and the ship is decorated with handicrafts from the ribereños, native people of the wildlife preserves.

Jahanis a riverboat built in 2011 for exploring Vietnam and Cambodia.Jahan accommodates 48 guests in 24 cabins, including two suites. Every cabin has a private balcony and the suites each have a private jacuzzi.Jahan has four decks and has several public areas where the expedition community can gather to watch life along the riverbank. The public spaces include a covered, open-air observatory, open bow and a pool on the top deck.

Lord of the Glens is specifically sized to be able to sail through the Caledonian Canal in Scotland, which connects the North Sea to the Atlantic, and can also navigate the coastline and venture to the islands of the Inner Hebrides.Lord of the Glensaccommodates 48 guests in 26 outside cabins.

Sea Cloud offers the experience of sailing aboard a fully-rigged ship in the Caribbean and Mediterranean and accommodates 58 guests in 28 outside cabins, including two original owner’s suites that still feature original marble baths and fireplaces. TheSea Cloud has extensive public spaces on the top deck, a dining room that can accommodate all guests at once for single seating and a lounge.

Ship Maintenance

In addition to routine repairs and maintenance performed on an ongoing basis and in accordance with applicable requirements, each of our expedition ships is taken out of service for a scheduled deeper maintenance period to conduct repairs and improvements. We maintain our fleet in accordance with applicable regulations, international conventions and insurance requirements. This includes regularly scheduled maintenance, periodic inspections, drydocking, wetdocking, and overhaul. In addition, renovations and replacements of various vessel elements are part of the ongoing process of maintaining the vessels to a high standard. On a year-to-year basis, increases in maintenance expense for the current owned fleet are anticipated to grow in line with inflation. For U.S. flagged ships, the statutory requirement is an annual docking and U.S. Coast Guard inspections, normally conducted in drydock. Internationally flagged ships have scheduled dockings approximately every 12 months, for a period of up to three to six weeks. Drydock interval and required inspections are statutory requirements controlled under chapters of the International Convention of the Safety of Life at Seas (“SOLAS”) and Classification Society instructions. Under these regulations, passenger ships must be inspected in drydock twice in five years, with the maximum duration between each drydock inspection not to exceed three years, and an underwater hull inspection is required annually. To the extent practical, each ship’s crew, catering and hotel staff remain with the ship during docking periods and assist in performing repair and maintenance work. We do not earn revenue while ships are in dock. Accordingly, dockings are typically planned during non-peak demand periods to minimize the adverse effect on revenue that results from ships being out of service.

12

Guest Activities and Services

We provide our guests the opportunity and the tools to be active and engaged explorers.

Vessels include a variety of equipment for exploration which, depending on the ship and destination, may include Zodiacs for water-level activities and quick transfers to shore, kayaks for personal exploration, motorized skiffs, an underwater camera, a remotely operated vehicle capable of reaching depths of 1,000 feet, a video microscope to study some of the smallest organisms of the marine ecosystem, a crow’s nest camera atop a ship’s mast, hydrophones for listening to vocalizations of marine mammals, snorkeling gear, scuba gear, and wetsuits. An experienced and knowledgeable expedition staff leads guests in exploration while hiking onshore, paddling on the water or observing wildlife from onboard the ship. All voyages feature a certified photo instructor onboard and many include photographers from National Geographic.

Our ships allow guests to be close to wild nature, but at the same time, enjoy a high level of comfort and convenience. High quality dining is an integral part of our expedition experience with influences and flavors that reflect the regions being explored, along with traditional fare. All food prepared aboard is sourced locally whenever practicable from sustainable providers. Seating is open and the atmosphere is relaxed. Our ships offer a range of services and amenities which allow our guests to travel in comfort. Depending on the ship, these may include a fitness center, a spa offering a variety of treatments, a photo kiosk for photographers to edit and sort photos, a pool, 24-hour beverage service, internet connection, laundry facilities, and a doctor on call.

We offer to handle virtually all travel aspects related to guest reservations and transportation, simplifying the planning and booking process for our guests. We also provide guests the opportunity to purchase pre- and post-expedition extensions or services that may include additional hotel nights, air travel, private transfers, excursions, land travel packages, and travel protection insurance.

Guests and Occupancy Rates

Selected statistical information regarding the company’s guests and occupancy is shown in the following table:

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
Available Guest Nights  184,366   180,206   177,135 
Guest Nights Sold  169,303   167,483   163,758 
Occupancy  91.8%  92.9%  92.4%
Maximum Guests  21,459   20,216   20,858 
Number of Guests  19,824   18,819   19,327 
Voyages  281   262   265 

13

Operations

Sales and Marketing

 

We place a strong emphasis on identifying the needs of our guests and creating expedition opportunities and products that guests value. We use communication strategies and marketing campaigns designed to strengthen brand awareness and to emphasize the distinctive qualities of each expedition we offer. Marketing strategies include the use of direct mail, traditional media, social media, brand websites and travel agencies.

 

We source our business through a combination of direct selling, travel agency networks and our strategic alliance with National Geographic. We believe in the value of the travel agency network distribution channel and invest in maintaining strong relationships with our key travel agency network partners and seek to maintain commission rates and incentive structures that are competitive within the marketplace.

 

Historically, our focus has been to primarily source guests for our expeditions from the U.S.United States. Expedition cruise guests sourced from the U.S. represented approximately 87%90%, 84%89% and 92%85% of our total global expedition cruise guestsguests’ ticket revenue in 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013, respectively. Guest ticket revenues generated by sales originating in countries outside of the U.S. were approximately 15%, 19% and 8% of total tour revenues in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

Our largest channel for guest bookings is direct contact, either by guests calling our toll-free number(1-800-EXPEDITION) and speaking with our expedition specialists, or requesting a reservation online at our website, expeditions.com. The direct channel represented nearly 43%41%, 49%39% and 46%43% of guest ticket revenues for 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

Our second largest channel isWe also generate significant bookings from travel agents and wholesalers, representing approximately 28%, 28%27% for the year ended 2017 and 26% of guest ticket revenues27% for 2015, 2014the years ended 2016 and 2013, respectively.2015. Agent outreach efforts are focused primarily on consortiums, or travel agent networks, which target affluent travelers. The four consortiums with which we have preferred partner agreements are Virtuoso, Signature, American Express and Ensemble. Preferred status provides their agents with financial incentives to book their customers on our expeditions and provides us the opportunity for enhanced marketing to their agents and end-user customers. Our agent and affinity sales team meet with hundreds of highly-targeted agents annually, at consortium conferences and training seminars, and in-person at agency offices to provide hands-on training, support and product knowledge. In addition, a very select group of highly-productive and motivated agents can earn incremental commissions as part of theLEX Leaders incentive program.

 

The National Geographic relationship also serves as a channel for bookings. Our alliance with National Geographic includes a co-selling and co-marketing arrangement through which National Geographic promotes our offerings in its marketing campaigns across web-based, email, print and other marketing platforms and sells our expeditions through its internal travel division. The National Geographic channel represented approximately 24%25%, 20%27% and 22%24% of guest ticket revenues for 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The remainder of our bookings, 5%6%, 3%7% and 6%5% of guest ticket revenues for 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively, comes from affinity groups and charters. Affinity groups are predominantly college and university alumni associations, and other travel organizations targeting specific market niches.

 

We have a broad and diverse marketing mix across multiple media platforms and channels, allowing us to effectively communicate our product offerings to past guests and prospective guests. We continually optimize our media mix to reach our target demographic. The majority of our annual global marketing spend is focused on consumer-direct channels, with direct mail being the largest segment of our marketing expenditures. Our detailed brochures present our expedition offerings comprehensively, providing guests with all the information needed to make an informed travel decision. We also execute direct mail campaigns with the primary purpose of generating qualified leads, upon which we will fulfill requests with the appropriate product brochure and/or DVD.digital media. We also promote our expeditions across a variety of print media, primarily magazines targeting affluent travelers, as well as nature and photography enthusiasts.

 

10

Our website, expeditions.com,www.expeditions.com, is supported internally by a dynamic content management system, allowing frequent updates, a visually-impactful design, large photos and video display with simple, straightforward navigation. We also send weekly mobile-optimized emails to our database of opt-in email subscribers, which link back to key areas on expeditions.com. In addition, we routinely offer webinars to offer greater insights into our expeditions, hosted by members of the expedition teams with intimate knowledge of the geographies featured.

 

14

We maintain an active presence on numerous social media platforms, focusing primarily on those with the greatest reach to our target demographic: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube.demographic. In addition, we routinely feed content to National Geographic’s social media platforms, which extend the reach of our brand significantly.

 

Our marketing and sales team is based in the U.S. and Sydney, Australia. The marketing team encompasses broad and diverse skill sets including product and channel marketing, digital marketing, database marketing, copywriting and creative, video production and research and analytics.

 

Expedition Cruise Pricing

 

Our voyage prices typically include accommodations and all expedition activities and meals, other than items of a personal nature, such as alcohol, airfare to and from an expedition, spa treatments and certain other specialized events or activities. Prices vary depending on many factors, including the destination,vessel, the destinations on a particular voyage, number of guest berths available, expedition length, cabin category selected and time of year during which the expedition takes place. Payment terms generally require an upfront deposit to confirm a reservation with the balance due prior to departure.

 

We focus on maintaining list pricing of our offerings and any discounting that we pursue is tactical, targeted and infrequent. In addition to our standard expedition packages, we may be able to offer a complete vessel for charter and may provide incentives for this type of arrangement. Group and multi-generational family travel may also be eligible for additional incentives based upon the voyage, duration and number of guests travelling. From time to time, we may incentivize guests to book with us with a variety of offers, including free or reduced price air transportation, hotel nights or other value addedvalue-added items. We offer rewards to our guests through our loyalty program,Friends for Life, to encourage repeat business.

 

Lindblad Expeditions – National Geographic Joint Fund for Exploration and Conservation

 

We seek to inspire people to explore and care about the planet. One of our governing principles is to positively impact the areas we explore and in which we work. To this end, we, along with the National Geographic Society, created the LEX-NG Fund to support projects at the global, regional and local level. The objective of the LEX-NG Fund is to protect the last wild places in the ocean, support innovative local projects and facilitate conservation, research, educational,education and community development projects in the places we explore. Together with our guests, we have raised more than $11.0$9 million since 1997, along with the Fund was established in 2008. In addition, 500,000 shares in Capitolof Lindblad common stock were contributed, or committed to be contributed, to the LEX-NG Fund by the founders of Capitol Acquisition Corp. II in connection with the merger with Lindblad Expeditions, Inc., to support the regions that we visit. Since we and the National Geographic Society together cover the LEX-NG Fund’s operating costs, 100% of guest contributions go directly to on-the-ground projects. In 2017, eight key regions plus two major National Geographic conservation and education initiatives were supported with an aggregate amount of $1.5 million. The majority of funds were donated by guests traveling aboard our fleet. The LEX-NG Fund is managed jointly by one of our staff members and two National Geographic Society staff members, and the Board is currently comprised of five members, including Sven-Olof Lindblad, our founder, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Dr. Jonathan Baillie, Chief Scientist and Senior Vice President, Science & Exploration at the National Geographic Society.

We currently operate a fleet of seven owned expedition ships and five seasonal charter vessels under the Lindblad brand. We have a longstanding relationship with the National Geographic Society, which was founded on a shared interest in exploration, research, technology and conservation. This relationship includes co-selling, co-marketing and branding arrangements with National Geographic Partners, LLC (“National Geographic”) whereby our owned vessels carry the National Geographic name and National Geographic sells our expeditions through its internal travel divisions. We collaborate with National Geographic on expedition planning to enhance the guest experience by having National Geographic experts, including photographers, writers, marine biologists, naturalists, field researchers and film crews, join our expeditions. Guests have the ability to interface with these experts through lectures, excursions, dining and other experiences throughout their expedition.

11

Environmental Stewardship

 

Our staff is involved in organizations such as the International Association of Antarctic Tour Operators and the Association of Arctic Expedition Cruise Operators, which seek to lead the tourism industry with management best practices for visiting places such as Antarctica, the Arctic and the Galápagos Islands. Our staff also works with the MarViva Foundation (a non-governmental organization focused on promoting the conservation and sustainable use of coastal and marine ecosystems in the eastern tropical Pacific) to provide a consumer market for sustainably caught fish from the first designated responsible fishing area of Costa Rica. We also work with the Charles Darwin Research Station and Charles Darwin Foundation on conservation initiatives geared toward preserving the Galápagos Islands.

 

Seasonality

 

We chooseOur tour revenues from the sale of guest tickets are mildly seasonal, historically larger in the first and third quarters. The seasonality of our operating results fluctuates due to visit geographic areasour vessels being taken out of service for scheduled maintenance or drydocking, which is typically during nonpeak demand periods, in the second and fourth quarters. Our drydock schedules are subject to cost and timing differences from year to year due to the availability of shipyards for certain work, drydock locations based upon many factors, including weather, marineon ship itineraries, operating conditions migration patterns, and various natural phenomena. Inexperienced especially in the northern hemisphere summer months, we visit the High Arcticpolar regions of the world, the Canadian Maritimes, Europe, and Alaska. In the northern hemisphere winter months, we travel to Antarctica, South America, Costa Rica, Baja California, and the Caribbean. The Galápagos Islands areapplicable regulations of class societies in the maritime industry, which require more extensive reviews periodically. Drydocking impacts operating results by reducing tour revenues and increasing cost of tours. Natural Habitat is a year-round destination offering a diverse varietyseasonal business, with the majority of marine, landits tour revenue recorded in the third and airborne wildlife.fourth quarter from its summer season departures and polar bear tours.

 

15

Suppliers

 

Our largest capital expenditures are for ship maintenance and acquisition and ourmaintenance. Our largest operating expenditures are for payroll, fuel, food and beverage, travel agent services and advertising and marketing. Most of the supplies that we require are available from numerous sources at competitive prices.

 

Insurance

 

We maintain comprehensive insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates and believe that our current coverage is at appropriate levels to protect against most of the risk involved in the conduct of our business.

 

We maintain insurance on the hull and machinery of each of our ships that includes additional coverage for disbursements, earnings and increased value. We also maintain protection and indemnity insurance for each of our owned ships. In addition, we maintain war risk insurance on each ship, which covers damage due to acts of war, including invasion, insurrection, terrorism, rebellion, piracy and hijacking. This coverage includes coverage for physical damage to the ship, which is not covered under the hull policies, as a result of war exclusion clauses in such hull policies. We also maintain protection and indemnity war risk coverage. Consistent with most marine war risk policies, under the terms of the war risk insurance coverage, underwriters can give notice that the policy will be canceled and reinstated at higher premium rates. We also maintain insurance coverage for shoreside property, shipboard inventory and marine and non-marine general liability risks, as well as business interruption insurance for our owned ships based on the evaluation of the financial exposure per vessel for net income and fixed overhead expenses.profitability. In addition, we maintain workers compensation, directorsdirectors’ and officers’ liability and other insurance coverage.

 

We historically have been able to obtain insurance coverage in amounts and at premiums we have deemed to be commercially acceptable. No assurance can be given that affordable and secure insurance markets will be available in the future, particularly for war risk insurance. All of our insurance coverage is subject to certain limitations, exclusions and deductible levels.

 

Regulation

 

Our ships are regulated by various international, national, state and local laws, regulations and treaties in force in the jurisdictions in which they operate. In addition, certain ships are registered in the U.S., the Bahamas or Ecuador, as applicable. Each ship is subject to regulations issued by its country of registry, including regulations issued pursuant to international treaties governing the safety of the ships, guests and crew as well as environmental protection. Each country of registry conducts periodic inspections to verify compliance with these regulations. Ships operating out of U.S. ports are subject to inspection by the U.S. Coast Guard for compliance with international treaties and by the United States Public Health Service for sanitary and health conditions. Ships are also subject to similar inspections pursuant to the laws and regulations of various other countries visited. We consider ourselves to be in material compliance with all the regulations applicable to our ships and that we have all licenses necessary to conduct our business. Health, safety, security, environmental and financial responsibility issues are, and will continue to be, an area of focus by the relevant government authorities in the U.S. and internationally. From time to time, various regulatory and legislative changes may be proposed that could impact operations and subject us to increasing compliance costs in the future.

12

 

Safety and Security Regulations

 

Our ships are required to comply with international safety standards defined in the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea (“SOLAS”), which, among other things, establishes requirements for ship design, structural features, materials, construction, life-saving equipment and safe management, and operation of ships to ensure guest and crew safety. The SOLAS standards are revised from time to time and the most recent modifications were phased in through 2010. SOLAS incorporates the International Safety Management Code (“ISM Code”), which provides an international standard for the safe management and operation of ships and for pollution prevention. The ISM Code is mandatory for all vessels, including passenger vessel operators. All of our operations and ships are regularly audited by various national authorities and maintain the required certificates of compliance with the ISM Code.

 

16

TheOur ships are also subject to various security requirements, including the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (“ISPS Code”), which is part of SOLAS, and the U.S. Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (“MTSA”), which applies to ships that operate in U.S. ports. In order to satisfy these security requirements, we implement security measures, conduct vessel security assessments and develop security plans. The security plans for all of the ships have been submitted to, and approved by, the respective countries of registry for compliance with the ISPS Code and the MTSA.

 

The Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act of 2010, which applies to passenger vessels that embark passengers from or include port stops within the U.S., requires the implementation of certain safety design features as well the establishment of practices for the reporting of and dealing with allegations of crime.

 

Environmental Regulations

 

We are subject to various U.S. and international laws and regulations relating to environmental protection. Under such laws and regulations, we are prohibited from, among other things, discharging certain materials, such as petrochemicals and plastics, into the waterways. From time to time, environmental and other regulators may consider more stringent regulations, which may affect our operations and increase compliance costs.

 

The ships are subject to the International Maritime Organization’s regulations under the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (the ‘‘MARPOL Regulations’’“MARPOL Regulations”), which includes requirements designed to minimize pollution by oil, sewage, garbage and air emissions. We have obtained the relevant international compliance certificates relating to oil, sewage and air pollution prevention for all of our ships.

 

The MARPOL Regulations impose global limitations on the sulfur content of fuel used by ships operating worldwide and also establish special Emission Control Areas (‘‘ECAs’’(“ECAs”) with stringent limitations on sulfur and nitrogen oxide emissions in these areas. As of February 2014, there were four established ECAs: the Baltic Sea, the North Sea/English Channel, certain of the waters surrounding the North American coast, and the waters surrounding Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Since July 1, 2010,Currently, ships operating in ECAs are required to operate on fuel with a sulfur content of 1.0%not more than 0.1% m/m (mass by mass). Ships operating elsewhere are subject to a limit of 3.5%, which wasis expected to be reduced to 0.1% effective January 1, 2015. Bynot more than 0.5% m/m on and after January 1, 2020 (or January 1, 2025 if the MARPOL Regulations will requireInternational Maritime Organization elects to defer the worldwide limitations onnew cap of sulfur content following a review of the availability of low sulfur fuel to be further reduced to 0.5%for use by ships).

 

In July 2011, new MARPOL Regulations introduced mandatory measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These include the utilization of an energy efficiency design index (“EEDI”) for new ships as well as the establishment of an energy efficient management plan for all ships. The EEDI is a performance-based mechanism that requires a certain minimum energy efficiency in new ships. These regulations apply to new vessels commissioned after January 1, 2013. In June 2013, the European Commission proposed legislation which would require cruise ship operators using ports in the European Union to monitor and report on the vessels’ annual carbon dioxide emissions starting in 2018.

The Jones Act

 

As U.S. flag vessels, theNational Geographic Sea Bird, theNational Geographic Sea Lionand theNational Geographic Sea BirdQuest, are subject to the U.S. laws relating to the transport of passengers andor cargo between U.S. ports in the U.S. coastwise trade. Our two newbuild coastal vesselsvessel, theNational Geographic Venture, currently under construction, will also be U.S. flagged.

 

These laws relating to vessels are principally contained in 46 U.S.C. Chapter 551 and 46 U.S.C. §50501 and the federal regulations promulgated thereunder and are commonly referred to collectively as the “Jones Act.” Subject to limited exceptions, the Jones Act requires, among other things, that vessels engaged in U.S. coastwise trade be owned and operated by “citizens of the United States” within the meaning of the Jones Act. For purposes of the Jones Act, a corporation, for example, must satisfy at least the following requirements to be deemed a U.S. citizen: (i) the corporation must be organized under the laws of the U.S. or of a state, territory or possession thereof; (ii) each of the chief executive officer and the chairman of the board of directors of such corporation, and each person authorized to act in the absence or disability of such persons, must be a U.S. citizen; (iii) no more than a minority of the number of directors of such corporation necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business can be non-U.S. citizens; and (iv) at least 75% of each class or series of stock in such corporation must be beneficially owned by U.S. citizens within the meaning of the Jones Act.

 

 1713 

 

Labor Regulations

 

The International Labour Organization, an agency of the United Nations that develops worldwide employment standards, adopted a Consolidated Maritime Labour Convention (the “Convention”) in 2006, which became effective in August 2013. The Convention reflects a broad range of standards and conditions governing all aspects of crew management for ships in international commerce, including additional requirements not previously in effect relating to the health, safety, repatriation, entitlements and status of crewmembers and crew recruitment practices. Each of our ships, except for our two ships operating in Ecuador (not a signatory to the Convention), has received its certification of compliance with the requirements of the Convention.

Consumer Financial Responsibility Regulations

 

U.S. law requires the operators of passenger vessels embarking passengers at U.S. ports to be certified by the United States Federal Maritime Commission as to their ability to satisfy obligations with respect to unearned passenger revenue in case of non-performance, and for liability in case of casualty or personal injury. We satisfy these requirements with respect to our operation of theNational Geographic Sea Bird and,National Geographic Sea Lion andNational Geographic Quest through an escrow account for passenger deposits and through our liability insurers.

 

Certain jurisdictions require that we establish financial responsibility to our guests resulting from the non-performance of our obligations; however, the related amounts do not have a material effect on our costs.

In Australia and parts of Europe, we are obligated to honor guests’ cruise payments made by them to their travel agents regardless of whether we receive such payments.

 

Regulations Regarding Protection of Disabled Persons

Our U.S. flag vessels, theNational Geographic Sea Bird, theNational Geographic Sea Lionand theNational Geographic Quest, are subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which creates affirmative requirements intended to facilitate access by disabled persons. The ADA requires that our U.S. flagged vessels make “reasonable accommodation” in their policies, practices and procedures to facilitate the carriage of passengers with disabilities.

  

In June 2013, the U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board proposed guidelines for the construction and alteration of passenger vessels to ensure that the vessels are readily accessible to and usable by passengers with disabilities. If and when finalized, these guidelines will be used by the U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Department of Justice to implement mandatory and enforceable standards for passenger vessels covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act. While we believe our vessels have been designed and outfitted to meet the needs of guests with disabilities, weWe cannot, at this time, accurately predict whether we will be required to make material modifications or incur significant additional expenses given the status of the proposed guidelines.

 

United States Income Taxation

The following is a discussion of the application of the U.S. federal and state income tax laws to us and is based on the current provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code, Treasury Department regulations, administrative rulings, court decisions and the relevant state tax laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions of the states where we have business operations. All of the foregoing is subject to change, and any such change could affect the accuracy of this discussion.

At the present time, our subsidiaries that are foreign corporations do not derive any significant income from sources within the U.S., and are not subject to significant U.S. federal income taxes. Any income earned by these subsidiaries from sources within the U.S. generally is subject to U.S. federal income tax at a top rate of 35% (and to U.S. branch profits tax at a rate of 30% on effectively connected earnings and profits, subject to certain adjustments) unless the requirements of the exemption under Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code are met. In general, any U.S. source income earned by one of our subsidiaries that is a foreign corporation qualifies for exemption under Section 883 if this income is derived from or incidental to the international operation of ships, and if the subsidiary is incorporated in a country that grants an equivalent exemption to U.S. corporations. The countries in which our subsidiaries that are foreign corporations are incorporated do grant equivalent exemptions to U.S. corporations. The income of our foreign subsidiaries that is treated as being derived from or incidental to the international operation of ships generally does not include any capital gains recognized upon a disposal of a vessel, or income from the sale of air and land transportation, shore excursions, and pre- and post-cruise tours. If one of our foreign subsidiaries recognizes a capital gain upon a disposal of a vessel, this capital gain will generally constitute income from sources within the U.S. and will generally not be entitled to exemption under Section 883.

18

Our subsidiaries that are U.S. corporations are subject to U.S. federal income tax at a top rate of 35% on all their income, and are subject to income tax in the various States within the U.S. in which they have operations. At the present time, the only State in which our U.S. subsidiaries are expected to pay significant amounts of state income taxes is Alaska.

We also pay income taxes in Australia, Ecuador and other countries within which we operate. In addition to, or instead of, income taxation, virtually all jurisdictions where our ships call impose some tax or fee, or both, based on guest headcount, tonnage or some other measure.

Competition

We compete with a number of cruise lines with competition varying by destination. The market is fragmented and primarily comprised of private operators. The primary competitors which operate in the geographic regions we serve include Silversea Expeditions, Compagnie du Ponant, Hurtigruten, and Un-Cruise Adventures. We also compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for guests’ leisure time. Demand for such activities is influenced by political and general economic conditions. Companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending.

Our principal competitive strengths, particularly our established reputation, experienced management team, product offerings, and association with National Geographic, provide us with a competitive advantage in the specialty cruise segment of the market.

The cruise industry in general and the expedition cruise industry specifically are characterized by high barriers to entry, including the existence of several established and recognizable brands, the large investment required to build a new, sophisticated cruise or expedition ship, the long lead time necessary to construct new ships, and limited newbuild shipyard capacity.

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had approximately 368528 employees, including 231312 shipboard employees, 134213 full-time employees and three part-time employees in our shoreside operations.

 

Business SegmentsCorporate Information and History

 

We arewere originally incorporated in Delaware on August 9, 2010 with the name Capitol Acquisition Corp. II as a specialty cruise operator with operations inblank check company to acquire, through a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, plan of arrangement, recapitalization, reorganization or other similar business combination, one segment. We evaluate the performance of our business based largely on the results of our single operating segment. We provide discrete financial information in total, by ship and type of ship. The chief operating decision maker, or CODM, and management review operating results monthly, and base operating decisions on the total results. Our reports provided to the Board of Directors are at a consolidated level. Management performance and related compensation is based on total results. Based on this assessment, we concluded that we have one single operating segment and therefore one reportable segment.more businesses or entities.

 

Corporate InformationOn July 8, 2015, we completed a series of mergers whereby Lindblad Expeditions, Inc., a New York corporation, became our wholly-owned subsidiary. Immediately following the mergers, we changed our name to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.

 

We are a Delaware corporation and ourOur corporate headquarters are located at 96 Morton Street, 9th Floor, New York, New York 10014. Our telephone number is (212) 261-9000. Our Internet website address iswww.expeditions.com. Our corporate filings, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K, our proxy statementsProxy Statements and reports filed by our officers and directors under Section 16 (a)16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, and any amendments to those filings, are available, free of charge, on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not intend for information contained on our website to be a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 1914 

 

Item 1A.Risk Factors

 

SetYou should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below are some ofand the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The matters discussed in the risk factors, and additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that if they were to occur,we currently deem immaterial, could materially and adversely affecthave a material adverse effect on our business, or could cause our actualfinancial condition, results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Kof operation and the other public statements we make.future growth prospects.

 

Risks Related to Our Business and Operations

 

Adverse worldwide economic, geopolitical or other conditions could reduce the demand for expedition cruisestravel and adversely impact our operating results, cash flows and financial condition, including potentially impairing the value of our fleet, goodwill and other assets.condition.

 

The demand for travel experiences, including expedition cruises and land-based travel, may be adversely affected by international, national and local economic and geopolitical conditions. In particular, challenginga deterioration in global economic conditions that adversely affectaffects discretionary income and consumer confidence may, in turn, result in expedition booking slowdowns, decreased expeditionbookings, prices and lower onboard revenues for the expedition and cruise and expedition cruise industries as compared to more robust economic times. In addition, any significant deterioration of global economic conditions could result in a prolonged period of booking slowdowns, depressed expedition prices and reduced onboard revenues.industries. Demand for our expedition cruisesexpeditions may also be influenced by geopolitical events. Unfavorable conditions, such as cross-border conflicts, civil unrest and governmental changes, can underminedecrease consumer demand and/orand result in reduced pricing for expeditions in areas affected by such conditions.

 

We may not be able to obtain sufficient financing or capital for our needs or may not be able to do so on terms that are acceptable or consistent with our expectations.

To fund our capital expenditures and scheduled debt payments, we have historically relied on a combination of cash flows provided by operations, drawdowns under available credit facilities, the incurrence of additional indebtedness and the sale of equity securities in private securities markets. Any circumstance or event which leads to a decrease in consumer cruise spending, such as worsening global economic conditions or significant incidents impacting the cruise industry, the expedition cruise industry, or the travel industry, could negatively affect our operating cash flows.

Although we believe that we have sufficient cash flows from operations and will have sufficient access to capital to fund our operations and obligations as expected, there can be no assurances to that effect. Our ability to access additional funding as and when needed, our ability to timely refinance and/or replace outstanding debt and credit facilities on acceptable terms and our cost of funding will depend upon numerous factors including but not limited to the condition of the financial markets, our financial performance and credit ratings and the performance of our industry in general.

Any inability to satisfy any covenants required by existing or future credit facilities could adversely impact our liquidity.

On July 8, 2015, we entered into the Amended Credit Agreement with Credit Suisse A.G. as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent. The Amended Credit Agreement (i) requires us to maintain a total net leverage ratio of 4.75 to 1.00 initially, which ratio is reduced by 0.25 on March 31, 2016 with equal reductions annually thereafter until March 31, 2020, when the total net leverage ratio shall be 3.50 to 1.00 thereafter; (ii) limits the amount of indebtedness we may incur generally and specifically for intercompany debt, debt incurred to finance acquisitions and improvements, for capital and synthetic lease obligations, for standby letters of credit, and in connection with refinancings; (iii) limits the amount we may spend in connection with certain types of investments; and (iv) requires the delivery of certain periodic financial statements and an operating budget. The Amended Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of our assets.

20

Any failure to comply with such terms, conditions, and covenants could result in an event of default. Further, if an event of default under a credit facility were to occur, cross default provisions, if any, could cause our other outstanding debt, if any, to be immediately due and payable. Upon such an occurrence, there could be no assurance that we would have sufficient liquidity to repay or the ability to refinance the borrowings under any such credit facilities or settle other outstanding contracts if such amounts were accelerated upon an event of default.

Incidents or adverse publicity concerning the cruise vacation industry, the expedition cruisetravel industry or the travel industry in general, weather conditions and other natural disasters or disruptions could affect our reputation as well as impact our sales and results of operations.

 

The operation and/or use of cruise ships, airplanes, land tours, port facilities and shore excursions involves the risk of accidents, illnesses, mechanical failures, environmental incidents including oil spills, and other incidents. Such incidents which may bring intocause guests and potential guests to question their safety, health, security and vacation satisfaction, whichand could negatively impact our reputation. Incidents involving cruise ships, and, in particularparticularly the safety and security of guests and crew, media coverage thereof, as well as adverse media publicity in general concerning the cruise vacation industry, have impacted and could in the future impact demand for our expedition cruisesexpeditions and pricing in the industry. The considerable expansion in the use of social media over recent years has compounded the potential scope of the negative publicity that could be generated by those incidents. If any such incident occurs during a time of high seasonal demand, the effect could disproportionately impact our results of operations for the year. In addition, incidents involving cruise ships may result in additional costs to our business, including costs related to increasing government or other regulatory oversight and, in the case of incidentsoversight. Incidents involving our own fleet potentialmay result in litigation.

 

Our fleet and the port facilities we use may also be adversely impacted by weather patterns or natural disasters or disruptions, such as hurricanes, earthquakes and changes in ice flows. It is possible thatfloes. From time to time, we couldmay be forced to alter itineraries or cancel an expedition or a series of expeditions due to these or other factors, which would have an adverse effect oncould negatively impact our sales and profitability. Increases in the frequency, severity or duration of severe weather events, including those related to climate change, could exacerbate the impact and cause further disruption to our operations. In addition, these and any other events whichthat impact the travel industry more generally may negatively impact our ability to deliver guests or crew to our expeditions and/or interrupt our ability to obtain services and goods from key vendors in our supply chain. Any of the foregoing could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and on industry performance.

Ship construction, repair or revitalization delays or mechanical faultsissues on existing vessels may result in cancellation of expeditions or unscheduled drydockings and repairs and thus adversely affect our results of operations.

 

We depend on shipyards to construct, repair, maintain and revitalize our ships on a timely basis and to ensure they remain in good working order. The sophisticated nature of building, repairing and revitalizing a ship involves risks.risks, and shipyards may encounter financial, technical or design problems when doing these jobs. Delays in ship construction, repair or revitalization or mechanical faultsfailures have in the past and may in the future result in delays or cancellationcancellations of expeditions or necessitateand unscheduled drydocks and repairs of ships. If there is a significant accident, mechanical failure or similar problem involving a ship, we may have to place a ship in drydock for an extended period for repairs. Any such delays, cancellations of expeditions and/or unscheduled drydockings interruptions or disruptions in service of any of our vessels resulting from weather conditions, natural disasters or otherwise could result, could have a severe impactmaterial adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. These events and any related adverse publicity could result in lost revenue, increased operating expenses, or both, and thus adversely affect our results of operations.

 

15

Delays or cost overruns in building new vessels (including the failure to deliver new vessels) could harm us.

 

Building new vessels is subject to risks of delay (including the failure to timely deliver new vessels to customers) or cost overruns caused by conditions beyond our control, including one or more of the following:

 

financial difficulties of the shipyard building a vessel, including bankruptcy;
lack of shipyard availability;
unforeseen engineering or construction problems;
changes to design specifications;
work stoppages;
weather interference;
delays or unanticipated shortages with respect to necessary materials, equipment or skilled labor; and
inability to obtain the requisite permits, approvals or certifications from governmental authorities and the applicable classification society upon completion of work.work;
financial difficulties of the shipyard building a vessel, including bankruptcy;
lack of shipyard availability;
work stoppages; and
weather interference.

 

Significant delays, cost overruns and failure to timely deliver new vessels we have committed to service one or more of our customersguests could adversely affect us in several ways, including delaying the implementation of our business strategies, or materially increasing our cost of servicing our commitments to our customers.guests or resulting in the cancellation of scheduled expeditions. In addition, there are a limited number of shipyards with the capability and capacity to build our new ships and, accordingly, increased demand for available new construction slots could impact our ability to construct new ships when and as planned and/or result in stronger bargaining power on the part of the shipyards.

 

We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain and/or expand our fleet.

 

We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain our fleet in good working order. Maintenance capital expenditures include capital expendituresthose associated with drydocking a vessel, modifying an existing vessel or acquiring a new vessel. These expenditures could increase as a result of changes in the cost of labor and materials; customer requirements; increases in our fleet size or the cost of replacement vessels; governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards relating to safety, security or the environment; and competitive standards. In addition, maintenance capital expenditures will vary from quarter to quarter based on the number of vessels drydocked during that quarter. Significant unexpected maintenance capital expenditures could have an adverse impact on our operations.

 

We will be required to makeare currently making substantial capital expenditures to increase the size of our fleet. We intend to expand our fleet by acquiringconstructing new vessels and may acquire existing vessels from other parties or constructing new vessels. Wein the future. Shipyards generally will be requiredrequire us to make installment payments on any new shipbuildship build prior to their delivery, in the future. Accordingly, we may be requiredwhich requires us to expend a significant amount of money to acquire or build a new vessel without any corresponding revenue for delivery well inan extended period of time. In addition, we may not receive the future.expected demand for our newly constructed or acquired vessels, which could have an adverse impact on our operations

 

21

An increase in capacity worldwide or excess capacity in a particular market could adversely impact our expedition sales and/or pricing.

 

Expedition sales and/or pricing may be impacted both by the introduction of new ships into the marketplace and by deployment decisions of us and our competitors. The further growth in capacity from these new ships and future orders, without an increase in the cruise industry’s share of the vacation market, could depress expedition prices and impede our ability to achieve yield improvement. In addition, to the extent that we or our competitors deploy ships to a particular itinerary and the resulting capacity in that region exceeds the demand, we may consider pricing adjustments, which may result in lower than anticipated profitability. Any of the foregoing could have an adverse impact on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition including potentially impairing the value of our ships, goodwill and other assets.condition.

 

If we are unable to appropriately balance our cost management strategies with our goal of satisfying guest expectations, our business may be adversely impacted.

Our goals call for us to provide high quality products and deliver high quality services. There can be no assurances that we can successfully balance these goals with our cost management strategies.

We may lose business to competitors throughout the vacation market.

We operate in the vacation market, and expedition cruising is one of many alternatives for people choosing a vacation. We therefore risk losing business not only to other cruise lines, but also to other vacation operators, which provide other leisure options including hotels, resorts and package holidays and tours.

We face significant competition from other vacation operators and cruise companies on the basis of pricing, destination, travel agent preference and also in terms of the nature of ships and services it offers to guests. Our competition within the expedition and cruise vacation industry depends on the destination and is fragmented and primarily comprised of private operators.

In the event that we do not compete effectively with other vacation operators and cruise companies, our results of operations and financial position could be adversely affected.

Fears of terrorist and pirate attacks, war and other hostilities, travel restrictions and the spread of contagious diseases could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

 

Events such as terrorist and pirate attacks, war and other hostilities and the resulting political instability, travel restrictions, such as travel bans to and from certain geographical areas and heightened regulations around customs and border control, the spread of contagious diseases, such as the Zika virus, and other related concerns over the safety, health and security aspects of traveling, or the fear of any of the foregoing, have had, and could have in the future, a significant adverse impact on demand and pricing in the travel and vacation industry. In view of our global operations, we are susceptible to a wide range of adverse events.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange ratesevents, which could decrease demand and adversely affect our financial results.

We earn revenues, pay expenses, recognize assets and incur liabilities in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, including, among others, the Euro, the Australian Dollar, the Swedish Krona, and the British Pound. In 2014 and 2015, we derived approximately 19% and 15%, respectively, of our guest ticket revenues from operations outside the United States. Because our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, we must convert revenues, income and expenses, as well as assets and liabilities, into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect during or at the end of each reporting period. Therefore, absent offsetting changes in other foreign currencies, increases or decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar against other major currencies will affect our revenues, net income and the value of balance sheet items denominated in foreign currencies. We use financial instruments to mitigate our net balance sheet exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations. However, there can be no assurances that fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against major currencies, would not materially affect our financial results.business.

 

 2216 

 

In addition, we have ship maintenance contracts andWe may lose business to competitors throughout the vacation market.

We operate in the future have ship construction contracts which are denominatedvacation market, and expedition cruising is one of many alternatives for people choosing a vacation. We therefore risk losing business not only to other cruise lines, but also to other vacation operators who provide other leisure options, including hotels, resorts and package holidays and tours.

We face significant competition from other vacation operators and cruise companies on the basis of pricing, destination, travel agent preference and also in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. While we have entered into, and may in the future enter into, forward contracts and collar options to manage a portionterms of the currency risk associated with these contracts,nature of ships and services we are or may be exposedoffer to fluctuations inguests. Our competition within the exchange rates for the portions of the contracts that have not been hedged. Additionally, if a shipyard is unable to perform under such a contract, any foreign currency forward contracts that were entered into to manage the currency risk would need to be terminated. Termination of these contracts could result in a significant loss.

Environmental, labor, healthexpedition and safety, financial responsibility and other maritime regulations could affect operations and increase operating costs.

The United States and various state and foreign government or regulatory agencies have enacted or are considering new environmental regulations or policies, such as requiring the use of low sulfur fuels, increasing fuel efficiency requirements, further restricting emissions, or other initiatives to limit greenhouse gas emissions that could increase our cost for fuel, cause us to incur significant expenses to purchase and/or develop new equipment and adversely impact the cruise vacation industry. Some environmental groups have also lobbied for more stringent regulationindustries depends on the destination and is fragmented and primarily comprised of cruise ships and have generated negative publicity about the cruise vacation industry and its environmental impact. An increase in fuel prices not only impacts our fuel costs, but also some of our other expenses, such as crew travel, freight and commodity prices.private operators.

 

In addition,the event that we are subject to various international, national, statedo not differentiate our offerings or otherwise do not compete effectively with other vacation operators and local laws, regulations and treaties that govern, among other things, safety standards applicable tocruise companies, our ships, treatmentresults of disabled persons, health and sanitary standards applicable to our guests, security standards on board our ships and at the ship/port interface areas,operations and financial responsibilities to our guests. These issues are, and we believe will continue toposition could be an area of focus by the relevant authorities throughout the world, especially in light of several recent incidents involving cruise ships. This could result in the enactment of more stringent regulation of cruise ships that could subject us to increasing compliance costs in the future.adversely affected.

 

Conducting business globally may result in increased costs and other risks.

 

We operate our business globally.globally and plan to continue to expand our international presence. Operating internationally exposes us to a number of risks, including unstable local economic conditions, volatile local political conditions, potential changes in duties and taxes, including changing interpretations of existing tax laws and regulations, potential changes in local laws, rules and regulations, required compliance with additional laws and policies affecting cruising, vacation or maritime businesses or governing the operations of foreign-based companies, currency fluctuations, interest rate movements, government controlled fuel prices, difficulties in operating under local business environments, U.S. and global anti-bribery laws or regulations, imposition of trade barriers, and restrictions on repatriation of earnings. If we are unable to address these risks adequately, our financial position and results of operations could be adversely affected, including potentially impairing the value of our ships, goodwill and other assets.

 

Operating globally also exposes us to numerous and sometimes conflicting legal and regulatory requirements. In many parts of the world, including countries in which we operate, practices in the local business communities might not conform to international business standards. We must adhere to policies designed to promote legal and regulatory compliance as well as applicable laws and regulations. However, we might not be successful in ensuring that our employees, agents, representatives and other third parties with whom we associate throughout the world properly adhere to them.

 

Failure by us, our employees or any of these third parties to adhere to our policies or applicable laws or regulations could result in penalties, sanctions, damage to our reputation and related costs which in turn could negatively affect our results of operations and cash flows.

 

23

Our attemptsefforts to expand our business into new markets may not be successful.

 

While our historical focus has been to serve guests from the North American expedition cruise market, we have expandedmay expand our focus to include other global markets. Expansion into new markets requires significant levels of investment. There can be no assurance that any new markets will develop as anticipated or that we will have success in any new markets, and if we do not, we may be unable to recover our investment, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations, including potentially impairing the value of our goodwill.

 

If our redeployment of vessels to a new market with new itineraries is not successful, our business and operating results may be adversely affected.affected.

 

We cannot predict whether new expeditions and new itineraries offered by any vessels redeployed will attract a number of guests comparable to previous expeditions. If redeployments and new expeditions do not attract as many guests as past expeditions or if there is a delay in finalizing or marketing the new itineraries, our business and operating results may be adversely affected.

 

17

Failure to develop the value of our brand and differentiate our products could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our success depends on the strength and continued development of our expedition brand and on the effectiveness of our brand strategies. Failure to protect and differentiate our brand from competitors throughout the vacation market could adversely affect our results of operations.

We have an on-going partnership with National Geographic and the termination or alterations in this relationship may have an adverse effect on our business.

The National Geographic Society is one of the largest non-profit scientific and educational institutions in the world. Its interests include geography, archaeology and natural science, the promotion of environmental and historical conservation, and the study of world culture and history. In furtherance of similar interests and goals, we have entered into a Tour Operator Agreement and an Alliance and License Agreement (collectively, the “NG Agreements”) with National Geographic Partners, LLC.

Pursuant to the NG Agreements, our owned vessels contain the phrase “National Geographic” in their names, we have access to certain of National Geographic’s marks and images for advertising purposes and we and our guests have access to National Geographic photographers, naturalists and other experts. National Geographic may in certain instances terminate the Alliance and License Agreement with us, including upon a termination event caused by a change of control in which Sven-Olof Lindblad or his designated successor ceases to hold a senior management role with the company, a termination due to our failure to achieve specified year-over-year revenue growth percentage requirements, a failure to meet the conditions necessary to extend the relationship through 2025 or otherwise. If the NG Agreements are terminated or modified in any material respect, due to any of the reasons set forth above or otherwise, our results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

We have a relationship with World Wildlife Fund (“WWF”) through our Natural Habitat subsidiary and the termination or alterations in this relationship may have an adverse effect on our Natural Habitat business.

WWF is a leading conservation organization whose mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on Earth. Natural Habitat partners with WWF to offer conservation travel through a license agreement that allows Natural Habitat to use the WWF name and logo in return for a royalty fee, through 2023.

If Natural Habitat’s license agreement with World Wildlife Fund was terminated or modified in any material respect, our results of operations for the Natural Habitat segment may be materially adversely affected.

We may not be able to obtain sufficient financing or capital for our needs or may not be able to do so on terms that are acceptable or consistent with our expectations.

Any circumstance or event that leads to a decrease in consumer cruise and land-based travel spending, such as worsening global economic conditions or significant incidents impacting the cruise industry, the expedition cruise industry or the travel industry, could negatively affect our operating cash flows. Although we believe that we have sufficient cash flows from operations and will have sufficient access to capital to fund our operations and obligations as expected, there can be no assurances to that effect. Our ability to access additional funding as and when needed, our ability to timely refinance and/or replace outstanding debt and credit facilities on acceptable terms and our cost of funding will depend upon numerous factors including but not limited to the condition of the financial markets, our financial performance and credit ratings and the performance of our industry in general.

Any inability to satisfy any covenants required by existing or future credit facilities could adversely impact our liquidity.

Our Restated Credit Agreement contains certain financial covenants and is secured by substantially all of our assets. Any failure to comply with such terms, conditions, and covenants could result in an event of default. Further, if an event of default under a credit facility were to occur, cross default provisions, if any, could cause our other outstanding debt, if any, to be immediately due and payable. Upon such an occurrence, there could be no assurance that we would have sufficient liquidity to repay or the ability to refinance the borrowings under any such credit facilities or settle other outstanding contracts if such amounts were accelerated upon an event of default.

Environmental, labor, health and safety, financial responsibility and other maritime regulations could affect operations and increase operating costs.

The United States and various state and foreign government or regulatory agencies have enacted or are considering new environmental regulations or policies, such as requiring the use of low sulfur fuels, increasing fuel efficiency requirements, further restricting emissions, or other initiatives to limit greenhouse gas emissions that could increase our cost for fuel, cause us to incur significant expenses to purchase and/or develop new equipment and adversely impact the cruise vacation industry. Some environmental groups, in particular, have also lobbied for more stringent regulation of cruise ships and have generated negative publicity about the cruise vacation industry and its environmental impact. An increase in fuel prices not only impacts our fuel costs, but also some of our other expenses, such as crew travel, freight, air travel, and commodity prices.

18

In addition, we are subject to various international, national, state and local laws, regulations and treaties that govern, among other things, safety standards applicable to our ships, treatment of disabled persons, health and sanitary standards applicable to our guests, security standards on board our ships and at the ship/port interface areas, and financial responsibilities to our guests. These issues are, and we believe will continue to be, an area of focus by the relevant authorities throughout the world, especially in light of several recent incidents involving cruise ships. This could result in the enactment of more stringent regulation of cruise ships that could subject us to increasing compliance costs in the future.

Our operating costs, especiallyparticularly fuel expenditures, could increase due to market forces and economic or geopolitical factors beyond our control.

 

Expenditures for fuel represent a significant cost of operating our business. If fuel prices rise significantly in a short period of time, we may be unable to increase fares or other fees sufficiently to offset fully our increased fuel costs. In addition, volatility in fuel prices or disruptions in fuel supplies could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. To date, we have not hedged our fuel costs with any fuel derivative instruments. If we decide to enter into such instruments in the future, we will be subject to the risk that the fuel derivatives will not provide adequate protection against significant increases in fuel prices and could in fact result in hedging losses and result in us effectively paying higher than market prices for fuel.

 

Our other capital expenditure and operating costs, including food, hotel, payroll, maintenance and repair, airfare, taxes, insurance and security costs, are subject to increases due to market forces and economic or political conditions or other factors beyond our control. Increases in these capital expenditure and operating costs could adversely affect our profitability.

 

Price increases for commercial airline service for our guests or major changes or reductions in commercial airline service and/or availability could increase our operating expenses and adversely impact the demand for cruises and undermine our ability to provide reasonably priced vacation packages to our guests.expedition travel.

 

Most of our guests depend on scheduled commercial airline services to transport them to or from the ports where our expeditions embark or disembark passengers. Increases in the price of airfare would increase the overall price of the expedition vacation to our guests, which may adversely impact demand for our expeditions. In addition, changes in the availability of commercial airline services could adversely affect our guests’ ability to obtain airfare,air transport, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Our reliance on travel agencies to sell and market our cruises exposes us to certain risks that, if realized, could adversely impact our business.

 

Because we rely on travel agencies to generate a substantial portion of the bookings for our ships, we must ensure that our commission rates and incentive structures remain competitive. If we fail to offer competitive compensation packages, these agencies may be incentivized to sell vacation packages offered by our competitors to our detriment, which could adversely impact our operating results. In addition, the travel agent industry is sensitive to economic conditions that impact discretionary income. Significant disruptions or contractions in the industry could reduce the number of travel agencies available for us to market and sell our expeditions, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

24

Disruptions in our shoreside operations or our information systems may adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Our principal executive office isoffices are located in New York, New York, and our principal shoreside operations are located in Seattle, Washington, and we have a sales office in Australia.Washington. Actual or threatened natural disasters (e.g., hurricanes, earthquakes, tornadoes, fires, and floods), terrorist attacks, or other similar disruptive events in these locations may have a material impact on our business continuity, reputation and results of operations. In addition, substantial or repeated information systems failures, computer viruses or cyber-attacks impacting our shoreside or shipboard operations could adversely impact our business. We do not generally carry business interruption insurance for our shoreside operations or our information systems. As such, any losses or damages incurred by us could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

 

Failure to developFluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could affect our financial results.

We earn revenues, pay expenses, recognize assets and incur liabilities in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, including, among others, the Euro, the Canadian Dollar, the Australian Dollar, the Swedish Krona, and the British Pound. In 2017, 2016 and 2015, we derived approximately 10%, 11% and 15%, respectively, of our guest ticket revenues from guests outside the United States. Because our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, we must convert revenues, income and expenses, as well as assets and liabilities, into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect during or at the end of each reporting period. Therefore, absent offsetting changes in other foreign currencies, increases or decreases in the value of our brand and differentiate our products could adverselythe U.S. dollar against other major currencies will affect our resultsrevenues, net income and the value of operations.balance sheet items denominated in foreign currencies. We use limited financial instruments to mitigate our net balance sheet exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations. However, there can be no assurances that fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against major currencies, would not materially affect our financial results.

 

Our success depends on

19

In addition, we have ship maintenance contracts and may in the strengthfuture have ship construction contracts which are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We may in the future enter into forward contracts and continued development of our expedition brand and on the effectiveness of our brand strategies. Failurecollar options to protect and differentiate our brand from competitors throughout the vacation market could adversely affect our results of operations. We havemanage a co-branding strategy with National Geographic, which is memorialized through an Alliance and License Agreement. Failure to maintain our relationship with National Geographic as a result of a breachportion of the Alliancecurrency risk associated with these contracts, and License Agreement,we are or may be exposed to fluctuations in the exchange rates for the portions of the contracts that have not been hedged. Additionally, if a termination event caused byshipyard is unable to perform under such a changecontract, any foreign currency forward contracts that were entered into to manage the currency risk would need to be terminated. Termination of controlthese contracts could result in which Sven-Olof Lindblad or his designated successor ceases to hold a senior management role with the company, a failure to meet the conditions necessary to extend the relationship through 2025, or otherwise could adversely affect our results of operations.significant loss.

 

We have an on-going relationship with National Geographic. Termination or alterations in this relationship may have an adverse effect on our business.

National Geographic is one of the largest non-profit scientific and educational institutions in the world. Its interests include geography, archaeology and natural science, the promotion of environmental and historical conservation, and the study of world culture and history. In furtherance of similar interests and goals, we have entered into a Tour Operator Agreement and an Alliance and License Agreement (collectively, the “Agreements”) with National Geographic.

Pursuant to the Agreements, our owned vessels contain the phrase “National Geographic” in their names, we have access to certain of National Geographic’s marks and images for advertising purposes and we and our guests have access to National Geographic photographers, naturalists and other experts. If the Agreements with National Geographic are terminated or the terms of the Agreements are modified in any material respect, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

The loss of key personnel, our inability to recruit or retain qualified personnel, or disruptions among our shipboard personnel due to strained employee relations could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Our success depends, in large part, on the reputation, skills and contributions of key executives (including Sven-Olof Lindblad, in particular) and other employees, and on our ability to recruit and retain high quality personnel. Our management team is comprised of individuals with a diverse knowledge base and skill sets acquired through extensive experience in expedition cruising, adventure travel, and hospitality. We must continue to sufficiently recruit, retain, train and motivate our employees to maintain our current business and support our projected growth. A loss of key executives or other key employees or disruptions among our personnel could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

We rely on third-party providers of various services integral to the operation of our businesses. These third parties may act in ways that could harm our business.

 

In order to achieve cost and operational efficiencies, we outsource to third-party vendors certain services that are integral to the operations of our global businesses, such as our onboard concessionaires, certain of our call center operations and operation of a large part of our information technology systems.businesses. We are subject to the risk that certain decisions are subject to the control of third-party service providers and that these decisions may adversely affect our activities. A failure to adequately monitor a third-party service provider’s compliance with a service level agreement or regulatory or legal requirements could result in significant economic and reputational harm to us.

 

25

There is also a risk that the confidentiality, privacy and/or security of data held by third parties or communicated over third-party networks or platforms could become compromised. Such a breach could adversely affect our reputation and in turn adversely affect our business.

 

A failure to keep pace with developments in technology or technological obsolescence could impair our operations or competitive position.

 

Our business continues to demand the use of sophisticated technology and systems, such as reservations and reporting systems. These technologies and systems must be refined, updated and/or replaced with more advanced systems in order to continue to meet our guests’ demands and expectations. If we are unable to do so in a timely manner or within reasonable cost parameters or if we are unable to appropriately and timely train our employees to operate any of these new systems, our business could suffer. We also may not achieve the benefits that we anticipate from any new technology or system, and a failure to do so could result in higher than anticipated costs or could impair our operating results.

 

We may be exposed to risks and costs associated with protecting the integrity and security of our guests’ and employees’ personal information.

 

We are subject to various risks associated with the collection, handling, storage and transmission of sensitive information, including risks related to compliance with applicable laws and other contractual obligations, as well as the risk that our systems collecting such information could be compromised. In the course of doing business, we collect large volumes of internal and guest data, including personally identifiable information for various business purposes. If we fail to maintain compliance with the various applicable data collection and privacy laws or with credit card industry standards or other applicable data security standards, we could be exposed to fines, penalties, restrictions, litigation or other expenses, and our business could be adversely impacted. In addition, even if we are fully compliant with legal standards and contractual requirements, we still may not be able to prevent security breaches involving sensitive data. Any breach, theft, loss, or fraudulent use of guest, employee or company data could cause consumers to lose confidence in the security of our information technology systems and choose not to purchase from us and expose us to risks of data loss, business disruption, litigation and other liability, any of which could adversely affect our business.

 

20

A change in our tax status under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), or other jurisdictions, may have adverse effects on our income.

 

At the present time, many of our subsidiaries that are foreign corporations do not derive any significant income from sources within the United States, and are not subject to significant United States federal income taxes. Any income earned by these subsidiaries from sources within the United States generally is subject to United States federal income tax (and United States branch profits tax) unless the requirements of the exemption under Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code are met. Although we expect that any United States source income of our foreign subsidiaries will generally qualify for the benefits of the Section 883 exemption, there is no assurance that such benefits will be available.

 

If budgetary constraints adversely impactIn addition, the jurisdictionsenactment of legislation implementing changes in which we operate, such as Australia or Ecuador, increases in income tax regulations ortaxation of international business activities, the adoption of other corporate tax reform affectingpolicies, or changes in tax legislation or policies could materially affect our financial position and results of operations. In general, changes in tax laws may affect our tax rate, increase our tax liabilities, carrying value of deferred tax assets, or our deferred tax liabilities. Any substantial changes in international corporate tax policies, enforcement activities or legislative initiatives may materially and adversely affect our business, the amount of taxes we are required to pay and our financial condition and results of operations generally.

Restrictions on travel or access to certain protected or preserved areas could adversely affect our business.

We believe that our expedition itineraries are a major reason why guests choose our expedition cruises over competing cruises and vacation options. However, our ability to follow our planned itinerary for any expedition cruise may be imposed.affected by a number of factors, including security concerns, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, local government regulations and restrictions and other restrictions on access, including access to protected or preserved areas.

 

For instance, the number of visitors admitted to the Galápagos National Park at any given time is limited by the number of “cupos” permits issued by the Galápagos National Parks Service. In June 2015, a new Ecuadorian Special Law for Protected Areas was approved and updated in November 2015. A Presidential Decree issued by President Correa of Ecuador in November 2015 established that cupos in effect as of July 2015 will have a validity of nine years. Our rights to operate in the Galapagos will therefore expire in July 2024 and based on the new law and decree, we will begin the renewal process in 2020.

Although the current holders of cupos will have the opportunity to re-apply for them, other enterprises and individuals will also have the opportunity to bid on cupos as they become subject to renewal. All bidders in this process must present proof that they fulfill the conditions to properly utilize the license. Notable criteria include, without limitation, access to a vessel, experience in tourism, a proven record of environmentally sensitive behavior, marketing requirements, etc. If the Galápagos National Parks Service were to further restrict access to the park, we might be required to alter certain of our travel itineraries. Such a development would negatively impact our business and revenues.

Changes in other governmental and environmental rules and regulations in the Galápagos Islands and other travel destinations could also cause sudden losses in revenue, together with additional expenditures due to the need to revise our existing itineraries. Restrictions on access for us and our guests to other protected or preserved areas, including national parks, may result in losses in revenues typically generated by our expeditions to such areas.

Litigation, enforcement actions, fines or penalties could adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations and/or damage our reputation.

 

Our business is subject to various United States and international laws and regulations that could lead to enforcement actions, fines, civil or criminal penalties or the assertion of litigation claims and damages. In addition, improper conduct by our employees, agents, partners, or expedition representatives could damage our reputation and/or lead to litigation or legal proceedings that could result in civil or criminal penalties, including substantial monetary fines. In certain circumstances, it may not be economical to defend against such matters and/or a legal strategy may not ultimately result in us prevailing in a matter. Such events could lead to an adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

In addition, as a result of any ship-related or other incidents, litigation claims, enforcement actions and regulatory actions and investigations, including, but not limited to, those arising from personal injury, loss of life, loss of or damage to personal property, business interruption losses or environmental damage to any affected coastal waters and the surrounding area, may be asserted or brought against various parties, including us and/or our subsidiaries. The time and attention of our management may also be diverted in defending such claims, actions and investigations. Subject to applicable insurance coverage, we may also incur costs both in defending against any claims, actions and investigations and for any judgments, fines, civil or criminal penalties if such claims, actions or investigations are adversely determined.

 2621 

 

Failure to comply with international safety regulations may subject us to increased liability that may adversely affect our insurance coverage resulting in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports which could adversely affect our business.

 

The operation of vessels is affected by the requirements of the International Maritime Organization’s International Safety Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and Pollution Prevention (“ISM Code”). The ISM Code requires ship owners and bareboat charterers to develop and maintain an extensive “Safety Management System” that includes the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for safe operation and describing procedures for dealing with emergencies. Our failure to comply with the ISM Code may subject us to increased liability, invalidate existing insurance or decrease available insurance coverage for the affected vessels and result in a denial of access to or detention in certain ports, all of which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and liquidity.

 

Compliance with environmental and other laws and regulations could adversely affect our business.

 

Extensive and changing environmental protection and other laws and regulations directly affect the operation of our vessels. These laws and regulations take the form of international conventions and agreements, including the International Maritime Organization conventions and regulations and the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, (“SOLAS”), which are applicable to all internationally trading vessels, and national, state and local laws and regulations, all of which are amended frequently. Under these laws and regulations, various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies and other regulatory authorities may require us to obtain permits, licenses and certificates in connection with our operations. Some countries in which we operate have laws that restrict the nationality of a vessel’s crew and prior and future ports of call, as well as other considerations relating to particular national interests. Changes in governmental regulations and safety or other equipment standards may require unbudgeted expenditures for alterations or the addition of new equipment for our vessels.

 

Restrictions on travel or accessAn inability to certain protected or preserved areasobtain adequate insurance coverage could adversely affect our business.business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

WeWhile we maintain comprehensive insurance and believe that our expedition itinerariescurrent coverage is at appropriate levels, we are not protected against all risks and there can be no assurance that any particular claim will be fully paid by our insurance. Such losses, to the extent they are not adequately covered by contractual remedies or insurance, could affect our financial results. Our protection and indemnity (“P&I”) liability insurance is placed on a major reason why guests choose our expedition cruises over competing cruisesmutual basis and vacation options. However,we are subject to additional premium calls in amounts based on claim records of all members of the P&I Club. We are also subject to additional premium assessments including, but not limited to, investment or underwriting shortfalls experienced by the P&I Club. If we were to sustain significant losses in the future, our ability to follow our planned itinerary for any particular expedition cruise mayobtain insurance coverage at all or at commercially reasonable rates could be affected by a numbermaterially adversely affected. Moreover, irrespective of factors, including security concerns, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, local government regulations and restrictions, and other restrictions on accessthe occurrence of such events, there can still be no assurance that we will be able to protectedobtain adequate insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates or preserved areas.at all.

 

For instance, the number of visitors admitted to the Galápagos National Park at any given time is limited by the number of cupos permits issued by the Galápagos National Parks Service. In June 2015, a new Ecuadorian Special Law for Protected Areas was approved and updated in November 2015. A Presidential Decree issued by President Correa of Ecuador in November 2015 established that cupos, which were in effect as of July 2015, will have a validity of nine years. Our operating rights are up for renewal in July 2024 and based on the new law, we will begin the renewal process in 2020. The current “owners” of the cupos will have the opportunity to re-apply for them, but any other enterprise or individual will have the opportunity to bid for the cupos. All bidders must present proof that they fulfill the conditions to properly utilize the license (access to a vessel, experience in tourism, proven environmental behavior, marketing, etc.). If the Galápagos National Parks Service were to further restrict access to the park, we might be required to alter certain of our travel itineraries, which would negatively impact our business and revenues.

Further, changes in other governmental and environmental rules and regulations in the Galápagos Islands and elsewhere could cause sudden losses in revenue and additional expenditures for alterations in our itineraries. In addition, restrictions on access by us and our guests to other protected or preserved areas, including national parks, may result in losses in revenues typically generated by our expeditions to such areas.

If we do not restrict the amount of ownership of our common stock by non-U.S. citizens, we could be prohibited from operating vessels in U.S. coastwise trade, which would adversely impact our business and operating results.

 

To the extent any of our United States flagged vessels are engaged in U.S. coastwise trade, we will be subject to the Jones Act, which governs, among other things, the ownership and operation of passenger vessels used to carry cargo andor passengers between U.S. ports. Subject to limited exceptions, the Jones Act requires that such vessels engaged in the U.S. coastwise trade be built in the United States, registered under the U.S. flag, manned by predominantly U.S. crews, and beneficially owned and operated by U.S. organized companies that are controlled and at least 75% owned by U.S. citizens within the meaning of the Jones Act. A failure to maintain compliance with the Jones Act would adversely affect our financial position and our results of operations andas we would be prohibited from operating vessels in the U.S. coastwise trade during any period in which we do not comply or cannot demonstrate to the satisfaction of the relevant governmental authorities our compliance with the Jones Act. In addition, a failure to maintain compliance could subject us to fines and our vessels could be subject to seizure and forfeiture for violations of the Jones Act and the related U.S. vessel documentation laws.

 

27

Restrictions on non-U.S. citizen ownership of certain U.S. flagged vessels could limit our ability to sell off a portion of our business or result in the forfeiture of certain of our vessels.

 

Compliance with the Jones Act requires that non-U.S. citizens within the meaning of the Jones Act beneficially own no more than 24.99% in the entities that directly or indirectly own the vessels that operate in the U.S. coastwise trade. If we were to seek to sell any portion of our business that owns any of these vessels, we would have fewer potential purchasers, because some potential purchasers might be unable or unwilling to satisfy the U.S. citizenship restrictions described above. As a result, the sales price for that portion of the business may not attain the amount that could be obtained in an unregulated market. Furthermore, if at any point we or any of the entities that directly or indirectly own our vessels cease to satisfy the requirements to be a U.S. citizen within the meaning of the Jones Act, we would become ineligible to operate in the U.S. coastwise trade and may become subject to penalties and risk forfeiture of our United States flagged vessels.

Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require substantial financial and management resources.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we evaluate and report on our system of internal controls. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny, civil or criminal penalties and/or stockholder litigation. Any inability to provide reliable financial reports could harm our business. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in the implementation of adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Inferior internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our securities.

 

 2822 

 

Risks Related to an Investment in Our Securities

 

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation limits the beneficial ownership of our common stock by individuals and entities that are not U.S. citizens within the meaning of the Jones Act. These restrictions may affect the liquidity of our common stock and may result in non-U.S. citizens being required to disgorge profits, sell their shares at a loss or relinquish their voting, dividend and distribution rights.

 

Under the Jones Act, and so long as we operate U.S. flagged vessels in coastwise trade, at least 75% of the outstanding shares of each class or series of our capital stock must be beneficially owned and controlled by U.S. citizens within the meaning of the Jones Act. Certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation are intended to facilitate compliance with this requirement and may have an adverse effect on certain holders or proposed transferees of shares of our common stock.

 

Under the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, any transfer, or attempted transfer, of any shares of capital stock will be void if the effect of such transfer, or attempted transfer, would be to cause one or more non-U.S. citizens in the aggregate to own (of record or beneficially) shares of any class or series of our capital stock in excess of 22% of the outstanding shares of such class or series. The liquidity or market value of the shares of common stock may be adversely impacted by such transfer restrictions.

  

In the event such restrictions voiding transfers would be ineffective for any reason, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that if any transfer would otherwise result in the number of shares of any class or series of capital stock owned (of record or beneficially) by non-U.S. citizens being in excess of 22% of the outstanding shares of such class or series, such transfer will cause such excess shares to be automatically transferred to a trust for the exclusive benefit of one or more charitable beneficiaries that are U.S. citizens. The proposed transferee will have no rights in the shares transferred to the trust, and the trustee, who is a U.S. citizen chosen by us and unaffiliated with us or the proposed transferee, will have all voting, dividend and distribution rights associated with the shares held in the trust. The trustee will sell such excess shares to a U.S. citizen within 20 days of receiving notice from us and distribute to the proposed transferee the lesser of the price that the proposed transferee paid for such shares and the amount received from the sale, and any gain from the sale will be paid to the charitable beneficiary of the trust.

 

These trust transfer provisions also apply to situations where ownership of a class or series of capital stock by non-U.S. citizens in excess of 22% would be exceeded by a change in the status of a record or beneficial owner thereof from a U.S. citizen to a non-U.S. citizen, in which case such person will receive the lesser of the market price of the shares on the date of such status change and the amount received from the sale. In addition, under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, if the sale or other disposition of shares of common stock would result in non-U.S. citizens owning (of record or beneficially) in excess of 22% of the outstanding shares of common stock, the excess shares shall be automatically transferred to a trust for disposal by a trustee in accordance with the trust transfer provisions described above. As part of the foregoing trust transfer provisions, the trustee will be deemed to have offered the excess shares in the trust to us at a price per share equal to the lesser of (i) the market price on the date we accept the offer and (ii) the price per share in the purported transfer or original issuance of shares, as described in the preceding paragraph, or the market price per share on the date of the status change, that resulted in the transfer to the trust.

 

As a result of the above trust transfer provisions, a proposed transferee that is a non-U.S. citizen or a record or beneficial owner whose citizenship status change results in excess shares may not receive any return on its investment in shares it purportedly purchases or owns, as the case may be, and it may sustain a loss.

 

To the extent that the above trust transfer provisions would be ineffective for any reason, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, if the percentage of the shares of any class or series of capital stock owned (of record or beneficially) by non-U.S. citizens is known to us to be in excess of 22% for such class or series, we, in our sole discretion, shall be entitled to redeem all or any portion of such shares most recently acquired (as determined by us in accordance with guidelines that are set forth in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation), by non-U.S. citizens, or owned (of record or beneficially) by non-U.S. citizens as a result of a change in citizenship status, in excess of such permitted percentage for such class or series at a redemption price based on a fair market value formula that is set forth in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Such excess shares shall not be accorded any voting, dividend or distribution rights until they have ceased to be excess shares, provided that they have not been already redeemed by us. As a result of these provisions, a stockholdershareholder who is a non-U.S. citizen may be required to sell its shares of common stock at an undesirable time or price and may not receive any return on its investment in such shares. Further, we may have to incur additional indebtedness, or use available cash (if any), to fund all or a portion of such redemption, in which case our financial condition may be materially weakened.

29

 

In order to assist our compliance with the Jones Act, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation permits us to require that any record or beneficial owner of any shares of our capital stock provide us with certain documentation concerning such owner’s citizenship. These provisions include a requirement that every person acquiring, directly or indirectly, five percent (5%) or more of the shares of any class or series of our capital stock must provide us with specified citizenship documentation. In the event that any person does not submit such requested or required documentation to us, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides us with certain remedies, including the suspension of the voting rights of the person’s shares owned by persons unable or unwilling to submit such documentation and the payment of dividends and distributions with respect to those shares into a segregated account. As a result of non-compliance with these provisions, a record or beneficial owner of the shares of our common stock may lose significant rights associated with those shares.

 

In addition to the risks described above, the foregoing ownership restrictions on non-U.S. citizens could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or change in control that might involve a premium price for common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.shareholders.

 

23

If non-U.S. citizens own more than 22% of our common stock, we may not have the funds or the ability to redeem any excess shares and the charitable trust mechanism described above may be deemed invalid or unenforceable, all with the result that we could be forced to either suspend our operations in the U.S. coastwise trade or be subject to substantial penalties.

 

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions voiding transfers of shares of any class or series of our capital stock that would result in non-U.S. citizens within the meaning of the Jones Act, in the aggregate, owning in excess of 22% of the shares of such class or series. In the event that this transfer restriction would be ineffective, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for the automatic transfer of such excess shares to a trust specified therein. These trust provisions also apply to excess shares that would result from a change in the status of a record or beneficial owner of shares of our capital stock from a U.S. citizen to a non-U.S. citizen. In the event that these trust transfer provisions would also be ineffective, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation permits us to redeem such excess shares. The per-share redemption price may be paid, as determined by our Board of Directors, by cash or redemption notes or the shares may be redeemed for warrants. However, we may not be able to redeem such excess shares for cash because our operations may not have generated sufficient excess cash flow to fund such redemption. Further, the methodology for transfer to and sale by a charitable trust could be deemed invalid or unenforceable in one or more jurisdictions. If, for any reason, we are unable to effect a redemption or charitable sale when beneficial ownership of shares by non-U.S. citizens is in excess of 24.99% of the common stock, or otherwise prevent non-U.S. citizens in the aggregate from beneficially owning shares in excess of 24.99% of any class or series of capital stock, or fail to exercise our redemption or forced sale rights because we are unaware that ownership exceeds such percentage, we will likely be unable to comply with the Jones Act and will likely be required by the applicable governmental authorities to suspend our operations in the U.S. coastwise trade. Any such actions by governmental authorities would have a severely detrimental impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows and any failure to suspend operations in violation of the Jones Act could cause us to be subject to material financial and operational penalties.

If we do not maintain a current and effective prospectus relating to the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants, warrant holders will only be able to exercise such warrants on a “cashless basis.”

If we do not maintain a current and effective prospectus relating to the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the public warrants at the time that holders wish to exercise such warrants, they will only be able to exercise them on a “cashless basis” pursuant to the exemption provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. As a result, the number of shares of common stock that holders will receive upon exercise of the public warrants will be fewer than it would have been had such holder exercised his warrant for cash. Further, if an exemption from registration is not available, holders would not be able to exercise on a cashless basis and would only be able to exercise their warrants for cash if a current and effective prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is available. Under the terms of the warrant agreement, we have agreed to use our best efforts to meet these conditions and to maintain a current and effective prospectus relating to the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants until the expiration of the warrants. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so. If we are unable to do so, the potential “upside” of the holder’s investment in our company may be reduced or the warrants may expire worthless.

An investor will only be able to exercise a warrant if the issuance of shares of common stock upon such exercise has been registered or qualified or is deemed exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of the holder of the warrants.

No warrants will be exercisable for cash and we will not be obligated to issue shares of common stock unless the shares of common stock issuable upon such exercise has been registered or qualified or deemed to be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of the holder of the warrants. If the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not qualified or exempt from qualification in the jurisdictions in which the holders of the warrants reside, the warrants may be deprived of any value, the market for the warrants may be limited and they may expire worthless if they cannot be sold.

We may amend the terms of the warrants in a way that may be adverse to holders with the approval by the holders of a majority of the then outstanding warrants.

Our warrants are issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and us. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision. The warrant agreement requires the approval by the holders of a majority of the then outstanding warrants (including the sponsor’s warrants) in order to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the warrants in a manner adverse to a holder if the holders of a majority of the warrants approve of such amendment.

30

We are an “emerging growth company” and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our shares of common stock less attractive to investors.

 

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012 (“JOBS Act”). We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years.until December 31, 2018. However, if our non-convertible debt issued within a three yearthree-year period or revenues exceeds $1 billion, or the market value of our shares of common stock that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million on the last day of the second fiscal quarter of any given fiscal year, we would cease to be an emerging growth company as of the following fiscal year. As an emerging growth company, we are not required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we have reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and we are exempt from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Additionally, as an emerging growth company, we have elected to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As such, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.Act. We cannot predict if investors will find our shares of common stock less attractive because we may rely on these provisions. If some investors find our shares of common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our shares and our share price may be more volatile.

 

Our outstanding warrants may have an adverse effect on the market price of shares of common stock.

 

As of March7, 2016,February 26, 2018, we had issued and outstanding warrants to purchase 12,040,93710,103,828 shares of common stock. The sale, or even the possibility of sale, of the shares underlying the warrants could have an adverse effect on the market price for our securities or on our ability to obtain future financing. If and to the extent these warrants are exercised, you may experience dilution to your holdings.

 

We may redeem the warrants at a time that is not beneficial to public investors.

 

We may call the public warrants for redemption at any time after the redemption criteria described in the prospectus for our initial public offering have been satisfied. If we call the public warrants for redemption, public stockholdersshareholders may be forced to accept a nominal redemption price or sell or exercise the warrants when they may not wish to do so.

 

24

Our management’s ability to require holders of our warrants to exercise such warrants on a cashless basis will cause holders to receive fewer shares of common stock upon their exercise of the warrants than they would have received had they been able to exercise their warrants for cash.

 

If we call our public warrants for redemption after the redemption criteria described in the prospectus for our initial public offering have been satisfied, our management will have the option to require any holder that wishes to exercise its warrant (including any warrants held by our initial stockholdersshareholders or their permitted transferees) to do so on a “cashless basis.” If our management chooses to require holders to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis, the number of shares of common stock received by a holder upon exercise will be fewer than it would have been had such holder exercised his warrant for cash. This will have the effect of reducing the potential “upside” of the holder’s investment in our company.

 

An active trading market for our common stock may not be sustained, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price at which you purchased them.

An active trading market for our shares may not be sustained. In the absence of an active trading market for our common stock, shares of common stock may not be able to be resold at or above the purchase price of such shares. Although there can be no assurances, we expect that our common stock will continue to be listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market. However, even if our common stock continues to be listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, there is no assurance that an active market for our common stock will continue in the foreseeable future.

We do not intend to pay any dividends to stockholdersshareholders in the foreseeable future.

 

We have not paid any cash dividends on our shares of common stock to date and do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial conditions. The payment of any dividends is within the discretion of our Board of Directors. It is the present intention of our Board of Directors to retain all earnings, if any, for use in our business operations and, accordingly, our Board of Directors does not anticipate declaring any dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result, any gain you will realize on our securities will result solely from the appreciation of such securities.

 

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit the price investors might be willing to pay in the future for our common stock and could entrench management.

31

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that stockholders may consider to be in their best interests. Our board of directors is divided into three classes, each of which will generally serve for a term of three years with only one class of directors being elected in each year. As a result, at a given annual meeting only a minority of the board of directors may be considered for election. Since our “staggered board” may prevent our stockholders from replacing a majority of our board of directors at any given annual meeting, it may entrench management and discourage unsolicited stockholder proposals that may be in the best interests of stockholders. Moreover, our Board of Directors has the ability to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred stock.

 

We are also subject to anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law, which could delay or prevent a change of control. Together these provisions may make more difficult the removal of management and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

 

Item 2.Properties

 

Our principal executive office is located at 96 Morton Street, New York, New York. WeYork where we lease our New York office, consisting of approximately 13,000 square feet. Our principal shoreside operations are located at 1415 Western Avenue, Seattle, Washington, consisting of approximately 7,200 square feet. We also lease our Natural Habitat office in Louisville, Colorado, a media studio in Burlington, Vermont and a salesan office in Sydney, Australia. A description of our vessels is set forth in Item 1 under the subheading “Expedition“Lindblad Expeditions, Ships and Voyages.”

 

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

 

We are involved in various claims, legal actions and regulatory proceedings arising from time to time in the ordinary course of business. The only pendingWe are not currently involved in any litigation involvednor, to our knowledge, is any litigation threatened against us, the outcome of which would, in our judgment based on information currently available to us, have a former employee alleging damages for injuries allegedly sustainedmaterial adverse effect on one of Lindblad’s vessels. The employee filed suit in the United States District Court, Central District of California on April 7, 2014. The case was transferred to the United States District Court, Western District of Washington, on jurisdictional grounds. The case has now settled, pending settlement funding. That funding will be provided by our protection and indemnity insurance. The litigation has had no material impact on ourfinancial position or results of operations.

 

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

 

None.Not applicable.

 

 3225 

 

PART II

 

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Market Information

 

Our common stock and warrants are traded on Thethe NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbols “LIND” and “LINDW,” respectively. The following table sets forth the high and low salesclosing prices for our common stock and warrants as reported by the NASDAQ Capital Market for the periods indicated.two most recent years by quarter:

 

 Units*  Common Stock  Warrants  Common Stock  Warrants 
Period High  Low  High  Low  High  Low  High  Low  High  Low 
Fiscal 2015:             
2017:         
Fourth Quarter  N/A   N/A  $11.33  $10.18  $3.20  $1.60  $11.13  $9.21  $1.95  $1.35 
Third Quarter  N/A   N/A  $11.03  $8.70  $2.48  $0.80  $11.21  $9.76  $2.25  $1.78 
Second Quarter $13.80  $10.52  $12.00  $10.20  $2.71  $1.05  $10.50  $8.95  $2.30  $1.87 
First Quarter $10.50  $9.85  $10.20  $8.91  $1.10  $0.26  $9.72  $8.62  $2.30  $1.90 
                                        
Fiscal 2014:                        

2016:

                
Fourth Quarter $10.37  $9.90  $9.88  $7.86  $0.54  $0.32  $10.08  $7.75  $2.55  $1.63 
Third Quarter $10.60  $9.97  $10.05  $8.90  $0.55  $0.28  $10.08  $8.51  $2.46  $1.55 
Second Quarter $12.21  $9.90  $10.53  $9.66  $0.69  $0.49  $10.70  $8.69  $2.60  $1.50 
First Quarter $10.95  $10.05  $9.89  $9.62  $0.65  $0.49  $11.40  $9.24  $3.00  $2.21 

 

* Our units were separated into one share of common stock and 0.5 warrants in connection with the mergers with Lindblad.

33

Holders

 

As of March 7, 2016,February 26, 2018, there were ten161 holders of record holders of our common stock eight recordand 10 holders of our warrants and four record holders of our restricted shares.warrants. Since certain of our shares and warrants are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of shareholders, the foregoing number is not representative of the number of beneficial owners.

Dividends

 

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock to date. We intend to retain all earnings, if any, for use in our business operations and for purchases of our common stock and warrants, accordingly, our Board of Directors does not anticipate declaring any dividends in the foreseeable future. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board and will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition, restrictions imposed by applicable law and our financing agreements and other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

  Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)  Weighted average exercise price of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
  Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) 
Plan category      
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  2,264,148  $3.03   2,146,700 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  ‒     ‒    ‒ 
Total (1)  2,264,148(2)   N/A   2,146,700(3) 

(1)Information is as of March7, 2016.
(2)Includes an aggregate of 33,300 unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units.
(3)Consists of shares available for issuance under our 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Recent Sales by the Company of Unregistered Securities

 

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended December 31, 2015.2017.

 

Repurchases of Securities

 

On November 9, 2015, we announced that2, 2016, our Board of Directors had approved a $15.0 million increase to the original $20.0 million stock and warrant repurchase plan (“Repurchase Plan”).Plan, announced in November 2015, to $35.0 million. This Repurchase Plan authorizes us to purchase from time to time our outstanding common stock and warrants through open market repurchases in compliance with Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and/or in privately negotiated transactions discretion based on market and business conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors. Any shares and warrants purchased will be retired. The Repurchase Plan has no time deadline and will continue until otherwise modified or terminated at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors at any time. The repurchases exclude shares repurchased to settle statutory employee tax withholding related to the vesting of stock awards. All repurchases were made using cash resources. There were no repurchases of common stock in the fourth quarter of 2017.

 

 3426 

 

The following table represents information with respect to purchases by usthe Company of ouroutstanding warrants during the months presented. We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2015.2017:

 

Period Total  number  of warrants  purchased  Average  price paid  per warrant  Total number of  warrants purchased as  part of publicly  announced plans or  programs  Maximum number or  approximate dollar value  of warrants that may yet  be purchased under the  plans or programs 
October 1-31, 2015  -  $-   -  $- 
November 1-30, 2015  935,000   2.50   935,000   17,667,063 
December 1-31, 2015  1,156,618   2.69   1,156,618   14,556,003 
Total  2,091,618  $2.62   2,091,618     
Period Total
number
of warrants
purchased
  Average
price paid
per warrant
  Total
number of
warrants purchased as
part of publicly
announced plans or
programs
  Approximate dollar
value of shares and warrants that
may yet be purchased
under the plans or
programs
 
October 1-31, 2017  -  $-   -  $13,001,479 
November 1-30, 2017  -   -   -   13,001,479 
December 1-31, 2017  16,495   1.35   16,495   12,979,046 
Total  16,495  $1.35   16,495  $12,979,046 

 

Stock Performance Graph

 

The following stock performance graph compares the performance of our common stock from July 3, 2013 (the date our warrants and common stock commenced separate trading)trading on the NASDAQ Capital Market) to December 31, 20152017 with the performance of the Standard and Poor's Corporation& Poor’s 500 Composite 500Stock Index and the Standard and Poor's Leisure Time Select Industry Index (Net TR).FTSE 100 Index. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 on July 3, 2013 and reinvestment of dividends. The stock performance graph should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing made by us under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate the stock performance graph by reference in another filing.

 

 

  07/03/13  12/31/13  12/31/14  12/31/15  12/31/16  12/31/17 
LIND $100.00  $100.42  $103.13  $115.97  $98.64  $102.19 
S&P 500  100.00   114.42   127.45   126.53   138.89   165.51 
FTSE 100 Index  100.00   108.33   105.40   100.20   114.65   123.40 

 

 3527 

 

Item 6.Selected Financial Data

 

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Financial Condition, the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
(In thousands, except per share and occupancy data) 2015  2014  2013  2012  2011 
              (unaudited) 
Income Statement Data:               
Tour revenues $209,985  $198,459  $192,237  $153,981  $133,427 
Operating income $15,502  $30,420  $23,522  $16,036  $19,697 
Net income $19,742  $22,245  $14,844  $5,170  $7,153 
                     
Per Share Data:                    
Earnings per share                    
Basic $0.44  $0.44  $0.29  $0.10  $0.14 
Diluted $0.43  $0.44  $0.29  $0.10  $0.14 
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic  44,917,829   50,878,894   51,106,436   51,106,436   51,106,436 
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted  45,575,387   50,878,894   51,106,436   51,106,436   51,106,436 
                     
Balance Sheet Data:                    
Total assets $381,613  $245,925  $207,028  $210,366  $144,039 
Total liabilities $267,692  $178,358  $151,455  $157,202  $124,852 
Total shareholders' equity $113,921  $67,567  $55,573  $53,007  $19,187 
                     
Other Data:                    
Occupancy  91.8%  92.9%  92.4%  92.1%  87.0%

  For the years ended December 31, 
(In thousands, except share and per share data) 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 
Income Statement Data:                    
Tour revenues $266,504  $242,346  $209,985  $198,459  $192,237 
Operating income $10,744  $13,981  $15,502  $30,420  $23,522 
Net (loss) income $(7,529) $5,059  $19,742  $22,245  $14,844 
Per Share Data:                    
(Loss) earnings per share:                    
Basic $(0.19) $0.11  $0.44  $0.44  $0.29 
Diluted $(0.19) $0.10  $0.43  $0.44  $0.29 
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic  44,576,912   45,649,971   44,917,829   50,878,894   51,106,436 
Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted  44,576,912   46,456,921   45,575,387   50,878,894   51,106,436 

 

36
  As of December 31, 
(In thousands) 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 
Balance Sheet Data:                    
Total assets $424,348  $407,701  $381,613  $245,925  $207,028 
Long-term debt $165,936  $165,878  $164,443  $56,690  $59,935 
Total liabilities $311,724  $288,722  $267,692  $178,358  $151,455 
Total stockholders’ equity $106,322  $113,809  $113,921  $67,567  $55,573 

 

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition andthe Results of Operations and Financial Condition

 

The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and the information contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K under the headingheadings “Risk Factors,” “Selected Financial Data,” and “Business.”

 

Overview

 

We currently operate a fleet of sixprovide expedition ships owned by our subsidiariescruising and four seasonal charter vesselsadventure travel experiences that include itineraries that feature up-close encounters with wildlife and have two new vessels on order for delivery in 2017nature, history and 2018.culture and promote guest empowerment and interactivity. Our mission is offering life-changing adventures on all seven continents and pioneering innovative ways to allow our guests to connect with exotic and remote places. Our

We currently operate a fleet of seven owned expedition ships are customized, nimble and intimately-scaledfive seasonal charter vessels that are able to venture where larger cruise ships cannot, thus allowing us to offer up-close experiences inunder the planet’s wild and remote places and capitals of culture. Many of these expeditions involve travel to remote places with limited infrastructure and ports (such as Antarctica and the Artic) or places that are best accessed byLindblad brand. We have a ship (such as the Galápagos, Alaska, Baja’s Sea of Cortez, Costa Rica, and Panama), and foster active engagement by guests. Each expedition ship is designed to be comfortable and inviting, while being fully equipped with state-of-the-art tools for in-depth exploration. We also have anstrategic business alliance with National Geographic founded on a shared interest in exploration, research, technology and conservation. This relationship includes a co-selling, co-marketing and branding arrangement whereby our owned vessels carry the National Geographic Society (“name and National Geographic”), who often provides lecturers andGeographic sells our expeditions through its internal travel division. We collaborate with National Geographic on voyage planning to enhance the guest experience by having National Geographic experts, including photographers, writers, marine biologists, naturalists, field researchers and film crews.crews, join our expeditions. Guests have the ability to interface with these experts through lectures, excursions, dining and other experiences throughout their voyage.

 

The key components of our business strategy are to deliver exceptional guest experiences, maximize occupancy levels, continually optimize pricing methodologies, effectively manage itinerary offerings to meet guest demand, maximize and grow net yields, elevate brand awareness and loyalty, and expand and operate the business in a safe, prudent and disciplined manner.

28

 

A perspective on how we maximize occupancy and optimize pricing is illustrated in the redeployment of theNational Geographic Orion, which came under our management in 2013. We added departures from the Antarctic Peninsula and extensive travel across the Pacific Ocean as well as began marketing the vessel’s offerings in the U.S., a core marketing region where we command strong pricing. In 2016, we further repositioned theNational Geographic Orion by redeploying the ship from serving the Western Australian geographies to voyages in Europe for the northern hemisphere summer. We deploy chartered vessels for various seasonal offerings and continually seek to optimize our charter fleet to balance our inventory with demand and maximized yields. We use our charter inventory as a mechanism to both increase travel options of our existing and prospective guests and also to test demand for certain areas and seasons to understand the potential for longer term deployments and additional vessel needs.

We continually evaluate a range of strategies for expansion of guest capacity. We consider closely the expected return on invested capital and the range of possibilities, such as a newbuild program, adding selected charters and the acquisition of existing ships or small operators. In December 2015, we executed definitive agreements for the construction of two new coastal vessels for delivery targeted in the second quarter of 2017 and the second quarter of 2018 at a purchase price of $48.0 million and $46.8 million, respectively. These 236-foot vessels are expected to have capacity of approximately 100 guests each and management considers this investment to be an important step to meet increasing demand for our offerings. The newbuild process will expose us to certain risks typically associated with new ship construction, which we are prepared to manage through detailed planning and close monitoring by our internal marine team. The purchase of the ships will be funded through a combination of cash available on our balance sheet and excess cash flows generated by our existing operations. Also in December 2015, we signed a definitive agreement for the purchase of theVia Australis to be used in our operations in the Galápagos Islands. We expect to take possession of the ship in the second quarter of 2016 and following a significant renovation expect to deploy the ship during the fourth quarter of 2016. TheVia Australis will replace theNational Geographic Endeavour. The purchase price for the ship is $18.0 million and we plan to spend up to $10.0 million to refurbish and outfit the ship immediately after closing.

37

We maintain our fleet in accordance with applicable regulations, international conventions and insurance requirements. This includes regularly scheduled maintenance, periodic inspections, drydocking, and overhaul. In addition, renovations and replacements of various vessel elements are part of the ongoing process of maintaining the vessels to a high standard. Following the acquisition of theNational Geographic Orion, the vessel underwent an extensive drydock process during which we added our own specific modifications in order for the ship to meet its operational requirements. On a year-to-year basis, increases in maintenance expense for the current owned fleet are anticipated to grow in line with inflation.

 

Due to the specific geographies in which we operate and the cost of providing access to fuel in our remote destinations, we have historically not experienced significant fluctuations in fuel costs with changes in world fuel commodity prices. However, the continued downward pressure is now becoming evident on fuel prices in all areas of the world in which we operate. Fuel costs represented 4.3%3.2%, 5.9%3.4% and 6.4%4.3% of our Lindblad segment tour revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014respectively.

In November 2017, the Company executed a contract to build a polar ice class vessel targeted to be competed in January 2020, with potential accelerated delivery to November 2019, with a total purchase price of 1,066.0 million Norwegian Kroner (NOK). Subsequently, LME exercised its right to make payments in United States Dollars, which resulted in a purchase price of $134.6 million, including hedging costs. The first twenty percent of the purchase price was paid shortly after execution of the Agreement with the remaining eighty percent due upon delivery and 2013, respectively. We have not hedgedacceptance of the vessel. The polar ice class contract includes options to build two additional ice class vessels, the first for delivery twelve months after the initial vessel and the second for delivery twelve months thereafter. The new build process exposes us to certain risks typically associated with new ship construction, which we manage through detailed planning and close monitoring by our fuel purchases historically, but we are evaluating a hedging strategy to manage cash flows related to variable interest and fuel prices.internal marine team.

 

SimilarIn December 2015, we entered into two separate contracts with Ice Floe LLC, to othersbuild theNational Geographic Quest and theNational Geographic Venture. Management considers this investment to be an important step to meet increasing demand for our expedition cruise offerings. TheNational Geographic Quest launched in the industry,third quarter of 2017 and operated in Alaska and British Columbia during the summer of 2017 before voyaging to Costa Rica and Panama to provide expeditions for the Northern Hemisphere winter season.

In December 2016, we have historically operated withlaunched theNational Geographic Endeavour II,which replaced theNational Geographic Endeavour.Endeavour II will operate year-round in the Galápagos Islands.National Geographic Endeavourwas fully depreciated and we incurred a meaningful working capital deficit. This deficit is mainly attributable to the fact that, under our business model, a vast majority of guest ticket receipts are collected in advance$0.8 million loss on disposal of the applicable sailing date. These advance passenger receipts remain a current liability untilvessel during the sailing datefourth quarter of 2016.

In the fourth quarter of 2016, theNational Geographic Orion experienced an issue with its main engine and the cash generated from them is used interchangeably with cash on hand from other cash from operations. However, as a result we cancelled one voyage in 2016 and four voyages during the first quarter of 2017 for necessary engine repairs and in the first quarter of 2017, theNational Geographic Sea Lion cancelled two voyages to repair the onboard air conditioning system. In addition, the delayed delivery of the AmendedNational Geographic Questcaused the cancellation of four highly booked voyages. The Company estimates that the impact of these cancellations was approximately $12.4 million in tour revenues and $9.0 million Adjusted EBITDA in 2017.

 On May 4, 2016, we expanded our land-based offerings by acquiring an 80.1% ownership interest in Natural Habitat, Inc. (“Natural Habitat”), an adventure travel and ecotourism company based in Colorado. Natural Habitat was founded by Benjamin L. Bressler, who retains a 19.9% noncontrolling interest in Natural Habitat. Examples of Natural Habitat’s expeditions include African safaris in Botswana, grizzly bear adventures in Alaska and polar bear tours in Canada. Since 2003, Natural Habitat has partnered with the World Wildlife Fund (“WWF”) to offer conservation travel, sustainable travel that directly protects nature. This agreement with WWF extends through 2023.

 On March 7, 2016, we entered into a Restated Credit Agreement with Credit Suisse, amending our existing senior secured credit facility with Credit Suisse (“Restated Credit Facility”). The Restated Credit Facility provides for our Company’s existing $175.0 million senior secured first lien term loan facility and a new $45.0 million senior secured incremental revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”), which includes a $5.0 million letter of credit sub facility. Our obligations under the merger proceeds, we had net working capitalRestated Credit Facility are secured by substantially all our assets. See Note 7 – Long-Term Debt in the Notes to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of $130.0 million as of December 31, 2015 as compared to a working capital deficit of $59.7 million as of December 31, 2014.this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Restated Credit Agreement.

 

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations isand financial condition are organized as follows:

 

 a review of our critical accounting policies and of our financial presentation, including the descriptionsdescription of certain line items and key operational and financial metrics;metrics we utilize to assist us in managing our business;
 a results and comparable discussion of our consolidated and segment results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20152017 and 20142016 and for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013; and2015;
 a discussion of our liquidity and capital resources, including future capital and contractual commitments and potential funding sources.sources; and

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods and the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes. Out of our significant accounting policies, which are described in Note 2 –Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K, certain accounting policies are deemed “critical,” as they require management’s highest degree of judgment, estimates and assumptions. While management believes its judgments, estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based on information presently available and actual results may differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

Stock-Based Compensation

We estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of the grant using an option-pricing model and restricted share values and recognize the expense over the required service periods.

For recording our stock-based compensation expense for service-based options, we have chosen to use:

the straight line method of allocating compensation cost for service-based options;
the Black-Scholes option pricing formula for time-based options;
the simplified method to calculate the expected term for options as discussed under the SEC’s guidance for share-based payments for service-based options;
an estimate of expected volatility based on the historical volatilitya review of our share price; and
an estimate for expected forfeitures.critical accounting policies.

 

 3829 

 

The three factors which most affect stock-based compensation are the fair value of the common stock underlying the stock options, the vesting term of the options and the volatility of such fair value of the underlying common stock. If our estimates are too high or too low, we may overstate or understate our stock-based compensation expense.Financial Presentation

 

Income Taxes

To measure deferred tax assets and liabilities, we provide a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets if, based upon the weight of available evidence, we do not believe it is “more-likely-than-not” that some or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. We will continue to evaluate the deferred tax asset valuation allowance balances in all of our foreign and U.S. companies to determine the appropriate level of valuation allowances. While we believe that the amount of the recorded financial statement benefits and tax reserves reflect the more-likely-than-not criteria, it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may result in a reduction to the tax benefits previously recorded on our consolidated financial statements or may exceed the current income tax reserves in amounts that could be material.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets

We review our long-lived assets, principally our vessels and operating rights, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the assessment of possible impairment is based on our ability to recover the carrying value of our asset, which is determined by using the asset’s estimated undiscounted future cash flows. If these estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment charge is recognized for the excess, if any, of the asset’s carrying value over its estimated fair value. A significant amount of judgment is required in estimating the future cash flows and fair values of our vessels and operating rights.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, there was no triggering event and we did not record an impairment of our long-lived assets. We reviewed the remaining useful life of theNational Geographic Endeavour, which is expected to be replaced by theVia Australis in the fourth quarter of 2016. The evaluation of theNational Geographic Endeavour’s useful life as of December 31, 2015 indicated a shorter remaining useful life of less than one year versus the previous estimated remaining useful life of seven years (see Note 5 – Property and Equipment). We do not expect any residual value for theNational Geographic Endeavour after the end of the fourth quarter of 2016. We also evaluated a new law in Ecuador and its effect on our operating rights in the Galápagos Islands. As a result of the new law, the life of the cupos changed from indefinite lives to nine years and amortization of operating rights began in August 2015 (see Note 4 – Operating Rights).

Financial Presentation

Description of Certain Line Items

 

Tour revenues

 

Tour revenues consist of the following:

 

 Guest ticket revenues recognized from the sale of guest tickets; and
 
Other tour revenues from the sale of pre- or post-expedition excursions, hotel accommodations and land-based expeditions; air transportation to and from the ships, goods and services rendered onboard that are not included in guest ticket prices, trip insurance, cancellation fees and cancellation fees.insurance proceeds.

  

Cost of tours

 

Cost of tours includes the following:

 

 Direct costs associated with revenues, including cost of pre- or post-expedition excursions, hotel accommodations and land-based expeditions, air and other transportation expenses and cost of goods and services rendered onboard;

 39 

 Payroll costs and related expenses for shipboard and expedition personnel;
 Food costs for guests and crew, including complimentary food and beverage amenities for guests;
 
Fuel costs and related costs of delivery, storage and safe disposal of waste; and
 
Other tour expenses, such as land costs, port costs, repairs and maintenance, equipment expense, drydock, ship insurance and charter hire costs.

 

Selling and marketing

 

Selling and marketing expenses include commissions and a broad range of advertising and promotional expenses.

 

General and administrative

 

General and administrative expenses primarily include the cost of shoreside vessel support, reservations and other administrative functions, including salaries and related benefits, credit card commissions, professional fees and rent.

 

Key Operational and Financial Metrics

 

We use a variety of operational and financial metrics, which are defined below, to evaluate our performance and financial condition. We use certainincluding non-GAAP financial measures, such as EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Net Yields and Net Cruise Costs, to enable us to analyze our performance and financial condition. We utilize these financial measures to manage our business on a day-to-day basis and believe that they are the most relevant measures of performance. Some of these measures are commonly used in the cruise and tourism industry to measureevaluate performance. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide expanded insight to measureassess revenue and cost performance, in addition to the standard GAAP-based financial measures. There are no specific rules or regulations for determining non-GAAP measures, and as such, they may not be comparable to measures used by other companies within the industry.

The presentation of non-GAAP financial information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. You should read this discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations and financial condition together with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto also included within.in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

30

Adjusted EBITDAis net income (loss) excluding depreciation and amortization, net interest expense and income tax benefit (expense).

Adjusted EBITDA is net income (loss) excluding depreciation and amortization, net interest expense, other income (expense), income tax (expense) benefit, (expense),(gain) loss on foreign currency, (gain) loss on transfer of assets, reorganization costs, and other supplemental adjustments. Other supplemental adjustments include certain non-operating items such as stock-based compensation, executive severance costs, the National Geographic fee amortization, merger-related expenses and acquisition-related expenses and retention expenses. We believeThe Company believes Adjusted EBITDA, when considered along with other performance measures, is a useful measure as it reflects certain operating drivers of the business, such as sales growth, operating costs, selling and administrative expense, and other operating income and expense. We believeThe Company believes Adjusted EBITDA canhelps provide a more complete understanding of the underlying operating results and trends and an enhanced overall understanding of ourthe Company’s financial performance and prospects for the future. While Adjusted EBITDA is not a recognized measure under GAAP, management uses this financial measure to evaluate and forecast business performance. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of liquidity or cash flows from operations or a measure comparable to net income as it does not take into account certain requirements, such as unearned passenger revenue,revenues, capital expenditures and related depreciation, principal and interest payments, and tax payments. OurThe Company’s use of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other companies within the industry. Management compensates for these limitations by using Adjusted EBITDA as only one of several measures for evaluating our business performance. In addition, capital expenditures, which impact depreciation and amortization, interest expense, and income tax benefit (expense), are reviewed separately by management.

 

The following metrics apply to our Lindblad segment:

Adjusted Net Cruise Costrepresents Net Cruise Cost adjusted for Non-GAAP other supplemental adjustments which include certain non-operating items such as stock-based compensation, the National Geographic fee amortization, merger-related expenses, and acquisition-related expenses.

Available Guest Nightsis a measurement of capacity and represents double occupancy per cabin (except single occupancy for a single capacity cabin) multiplied by the number of cruise days for the period. We also record the number of guest nights available on our limited land programs in this definition. We use this measure to perform capacity and rate analysis to identify the main non-capacity drivers that cause revenue and expense to vary.

  

40

Gross Cruise Cost represents the sum of cost of tours plus merger-related expenses, selling and marketing expenseexpenses, and general and administrative expense.expenses.

 

Gross Yieldrepresents tour revenues less insurance proceeds divided by Available Guest Nights.

 

Guest Nights Soldrepresents the number of guests carried for the period multiplied by the number of nights sailed within the period.

 

Maximum Guestsis a measure of capacity and represents the maximum number of guests in a period and is based on double occupancy per cabin (except single occupancy for a single capacity cabin).

 

Net Cruise Costrepresents Gross Cruise Cost excluding commissions and certain other direct costs of guest ticket revenues and other tour revenues.

 

Net Cruise Cost excludingExcluding Fuelrepresents Net Cruise Cost excluding fuel costs.

 

Net Revenuerepresents tour revenues less insurance proceeds, commissions and direct costs of other tour revenues.

 

Net Yieldrepresents Net Revenue divided by Available Guest Nights.

 

Number of Guestsrepresents the number of guests that travel with us in a period.

 

Occupancyis calculated by dividing Guest Nights Sold by Available Guest Nights.

Voyagesrepresent the number of ship expeditions completed during the period.

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

The U.S. dollar is the functional currency in our foreign operations and remeasurementre-measurement adjustments and gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are recorded as foreign exchange gains or losses in the consolidated statements of income.operations.

 

We becameSeasonality

Lindblad tour revenues from the sale of guest tickets are mildly seasonal, historically larger in the first and third quarters. The seasonality of our operating results increases due to our vessels being taken out of service for scheduled maintenance or drydocking, which is typically during non-peak demand periods, in the second and fourth quarters. Our drydock schedules are subject to foreign currency translationcost and timing differences from year to year due to the availability of shipyards for certain work, drydock locations based on ship itineraries, operating conditions experienced especially in connectionthe polar regions, and the applicable regulations of class societies in the maritime industry, which require more extensive reviews periodically. Drydocking impacts operating results by reducing tour revenues and increasing cost of tours. Natural Habitat is a seasonal business, with our acquisitionthe majority of Fillmore Pearl Holdings Ltd., which operates partiallyits tour revenue recorded in Australia and whose functional currency is the U.S. dollar.

Results of Operations

Results and demand for our business continued to improve in 2015.

In the year ended December 31, 2015, we generated revenues of $210.0 million compared to revenues of $198.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, which represents an increase of $11.5 million, or 5.8%. Net income was $19.7 million and $22.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2015, we generated Adjusted EBITDA (as defined below) of $46.8 million compared to $44.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.fourth quarter from polar bear tours.

 

 4131 

Results of Operations – Consolidated

 

We reported consolidated tour revenues, cost of tours, operating expenses, operating income and net income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 as shown in the following table:

 

 For the Years Ended December 31,  For the years ended December 31, 
(In thousands, except per share data) 2015  2014  2013  2017  2016  Change  %  2015  Change  % 
Tour revenues $209,985  $198,459  $192,237  $266,504  $242,346  $24,158   10% $209,985  $32,361   15%
Cost of tours  95,417   90,002   96,655   135,526   118,977   16,549   14%  95,417   23,560   25%
Operating expenses  99,066   78,037   72,060 
Gross profit  130,978   123,369   7,609   6%  114,568   8,801   8%
General and administrative  60,529   51,896   8,633   17%  38,994   12,902   33%
Selling and marketing  42,354   39,072   3,282   8%  35,083   3,989   11%
Depreciation and amortization  17,351   18,420   (1,069)  (6%)  11,645   6,775   58%
Merger-related expenses  -   -   -   NA   13,344   (13,344)  NA 
Operating income  15,502   30,420   23,522  $10,744  $13,981  $(3,237)  (23%)  15,502   (1,521)  (10%)
Net income  19,742   22,245   14,844 
Earnings per share – Common            
Net (loss) income  (7,529)  5,059   (12,588)  (249%) $19,742  $(14,683)  (74%)
(Loss) earnings per share available to common stockholders                            
Basic $0.44  $0.44  $0.29  $(0.19) $0.11  $(0.30)  (273%) $0.44  $(0.33)  (75%)
Diluted  0.43   0.44   0.29   (0.19)  0.10   (0.29)  (290%)  0.43   (0.33)  (77%)
Earnings per share – Class B            
Basic $-  $0.44  $0.29 
Diluted  -   0.44   0.29 

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 - Consolidated

 

The following table sets forth our operating data as a percentage of total revenue:Tour Revenues

 

Tour revenues increased $24.2 million, or 10%, to $266.5 million in 2017 compared to $242.3 million in 2016. The Lindblad segment increased tour revenues by $9.0 million driven primarily by the launch of theNational Geographic Quest and theNational Geographic Endeavour II,as well as additional charter expeditions, partially offset by the cancellation of four highly booked voyages on theNational Geographic Orion and two highly booked voyages on theNational Geographic Sea Lion. Tour revenues at the Natural Habitat segment, which was acquired in the second quarter of 2016, increased $15.2 million primarily due to a full twelve months of operations in 2017. It is estimated that total company tour revenues would have increased approximately $36.5 million, or 15%, over the prior year to $278.9 million excluding the impact of the voyage cancellations on theNational Geographic Orion and theNational Geographic Sea Lionand the delayed delivery of theNational Geographic Quest.

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
Tour revenues  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Cost of tours  45.4%  45.4%  50.3%
Gross profit  54.6%  54.6%  49.7%
             
Operating expenses:            
General and administrative  18.6%  18.1%  15.8%
Selling and marketing  16.7%  15.5%  15.6%
Merger related expenses  6.4%  0.0%  0.0%
Depreciation and amortization  5.5%  5.7%  6.1%
Total operating expenses  47.2%  39.3%  37.5%
             
Operating income  7.4%  15.3%  12.2%
             
Other (expense) income:            
Change in fair value of obligation to repurchase shares of common stock  0.0%  0.0%  (0.2%)
(Loss) gain on foreign currency  0.0%  0.0%  0.7%
Gain on transfer of assets  3.6%  0.0%  0.0%
Other income, net  2.4%  0.0%  0.0%
Interest expense, net  (5.2%)  (2.7%)  (4.1%)
Total other income (expense)  0.8%  (2.7%)  (3.6%)
             
Income before income taxes  8.2%  12.6%  8.6%
             
Income tax(benefit) expense  (1.2%)  1.4%  0.9%
             
Net income  9.4%  11.2%  7.7%

Cost of Tours

Cost of tours increased $16.5 million, or 14%, to $135.5 million in 2017 compared to $119.0 million in 2016. At the Lindblad segment, cost of tours increased $8.3 million primarily related to the launch of theNational Geographic Quest, as well as additional charter expeditions and costs related to cancelled voyages, partially offset by lower drydock expense. At the Natural Habitat segment cost of tours increased $8.0 million primarily due to a full twelve months of operations in 2017.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by $8.6 million, or 17%, to $60.5 million in 2017 compared to $51.9 million in 2016. At the Lindblad segment, general and administrative expenses increased $4.5 million primarily due to a $5.2 million increase in stock based compensation, which was mainly associated with the CEO Share Allocation Plan, as well as $1.4 million in executive severance costs. The increase was partially offset by lower personnel and consulting costs. At the Natural Habitat segment, general and administrative expenses increased $4.2 million primarily due to a full twelve months of operations in 2017.

 

 4232 

Selling and Marketing Expenses

Selling and marketing expenses increased $3.3 million, or 8%, to $42.4 million in 2017 compared to $39.1 million in 2016 primarily due to a $2.1 million increase at the Lindblad segment as result of increased commission and royalty expense associated with the higher tour revenues. At the Natural Habitat segment, selling and marketing expenses increased $1.2 million primarily due to a full twelve months of operations in 2017.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $1.1 million, or 6%, to $17.4 million in 2017 compared to $18.4 million in 2016 primarily related to accelerated depreciation of $5.0 million associated with the retirement of theNational Geographic Endeavour in 2016, which was partially offset by depreciation in 2017 related to the addition of theNational Geographic Endeavour IIand theNational Geographic Questto the fleet.

Other (Expense) Income

Other expenses were $8.3 million in 2017 compared to $12.1 million in 2016. The $3.8 million change was primarily due to the following factors:

In 2017, we recorded a $1.1 million gain in foreign currency translation compared to a loss of $0.7 million in 2016 due to the strength of the U.S. dollar in relation to the Canadian dollar and the Euro.

Interest expense, net, decreased $0.4 million to $9.7 million in 2017 from $10.1 million in 2016 due to higher capitalized interest primarily related to theNational Geographic Quest and theNational Geographic Venture offset by higher cash interest caused by higher rates.


In 2017, the $0.5 million gain on sale primarily related to the sale of theNational Geographic Endeavour. We had recognized a loss of $0.8 million in 2016 related to the loss of disposal of theNational Geographic Endeavour.

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015

Tour Revenues

Tour revenues increased $32.3 million, or 15%, to $242.3 million in 2016 compared to $210.0 million in 2015. The increase was primarily a result of $34.5 million in added tour revenues from the acquisition of Natural Habitat, partially offset by a decrease of $2.2 million of tour revenues at the Lindblad segment.

Cost of Tours

Total cost of tours increased $23.6 million, or 25%, to $119.0 million in 2016 compared to $95.4 million in 2015. The increase was primarily a result of $22.5 million of additional tour costs related to the acquisition of Natural Habitat and a $1.1 million increase in cost of tours at the Lindblad segment due to increased drydock and charter expenses, partially offset by lower fuel expenses.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by $12.9 million, or 33%, to $51.9 million in 2016 compared to $39.0 million in 2015. The increase was primarily a result of $6.3 million in added expenses from the acquisition of Natural Habitat and an increase at the Lindblad segment, resulting from $5.3 million in additional personnel and public company costs.

Selling and Marketing Expenses

Selling and marketing expenses increased $4.0 million, or 11%, to $39.1 million in 2016 compared to $35.1 million in 2015. The increase was primarily a result of $2.7 million in expenses from the acquisition of Natural Habitat and a $1.5 million increase in National Geographic fee amortization.

Merger-Related Expenses

Merger-related expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $13.3 million consisting of one-time professional fees associated with the merger transaction that was completed in July 2015.

33

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $18.4 million and $11.6 million, respectively. The $6.8 million increase was primarily related to the $5.0 million of accelerated depreciation for theNational Geographic Endeavour described in Item 8 of this Annual Report in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

Other (Expense) Income

Other expenses were $12.1 million in 2016 compared to other income of $1.6 million in 2015. The $13.7 million change was primarily due to the following factors:

A $0.8 million loss on disposal ofNational Geographic Endeavourin 2016 compared to the $5.0 million success fee income and the gain on the disposal of assets of $7.5 million in 2015.
Interest expense, net, decreased $0.8 million to $10.1 million in 2016 from $10.9 million in 2015. The decrease was primarily related to $1.6 million in capitalized interest in 2016 with no capitalized interest for 2015 and a $1.4 million decrease primarily from the accelerated amortization of deferred finance costs related to the repayment of our senior debt in May 2015 partially offset by $2.2 million in higher cash interest primarily due to higher debt levels from our Restated Credit Facility See Item 8 of this Annual Report Note 7 – Long-Term Debt; and
In 2016, we recorded a $0.7 million loss in foreign currency translation compared to a small loss in 2015.

Results of Operations – Segments

Selected information for our segments is below.The presentation of non-GAAP financial information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP.

  For the years ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2017  2016  Change  %  2015  Change  % 
Tour revenues:                            
Lindblad $216,815  $207,836  $8,979   4% $209,985  $(2,149)  (1%)
Natural Habitat*  49,689   34,510   15,179   44%  -   34,510   NA 
Total tour revenues $266,504  $242,346  $24,158   10% $209,985  $32,361   15%
Impact of voyage cancellations  12,353   -   12,353    NA   -   -   NA 
Total tour revenues excluding
   voyage cancellations
 $278,857  $242,346  $36,511   15% $209,985  $32,361   15%
Operating income (loss):                            
Lindblad $7,291  $11,794  $(4,503)  (38%) $15,502  $(3,708)  (24%)
Natural Habitat*  3,452   2,187   1,265   58%  -   2,187   NA 
Total operating income  10,743   13,981   (3,238)  (23%)  15,502   (1,521)  (10%)
Impact of voyage cancellations  8,798   -   8,798   NA   -   -   NA 
Total operating income excluding
   voyage cancellations
 $19,541  $13,981  $5,560   40% $15,502  $(1,521)  (10%)
Adjusted EBITDA:                            
Lindblad $38,655  $38,624  $31   0% $46,801  $(8,177)  (17%)
Natural Habitat*  4,834   3,038   1,796   59%  -   3,038   NA 
Total adjusted EBITDA  43,489   41,662   1,827   4%  46,801   (5,139)  (11%)
Impact of voyage cancellations  9,047   -   9,047   NA   -   -   NA 
Total adjusted EBITDA excluding
   voyage cancellations
 $52,536  $41,662  $10,874   26% $46,801  $(5,139)  (11%)

* The 2016 Natural Habitat segment results represent activity from acquisition date of May 2016 through December 31, 2016.

34


Results of Operations – Lindblad Segment

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2016

Tour Revenues

Tour revenues increased $9.0 million, or 4%, to $216.8 million in 2017 compared to $207.8 million in 2016 primarily due to additional guest ticket revenue associated with the launch of theNational Geographic Questand theNational Geographic EndeavourII, as well as from additional charter expeditions and higher yields. Net Yield in 2017 increased to $985 compared to $976 in 2016,primarily driven by price increases and changes in itineraries. This increase was partially offset by the impact of the cancellation of four highly booked voyages of theNational Geographic Orion and two highly booked voyages of theNational Geographic Sea Lion. It is estimated tour revenues would have increased approximately $21.3 million, or 10%, over the prior year to $229.2 million excluding the impact of the voyage cancellations and the delayed delivery of theNational Geographic Quest.

Operating Income

Operating income decreased $4.5 million, or 38%, to $7.3 million in 2017 compared to $11.8 million in 2016 primarily related to the voyage cancellations on theNational Geographic Orion andNational Geographic Sea Lion during the first quarter of 2017. The operating income also reflects higher tour revenues and lower drydock costs, partially offset by the costs associated with operating theNational Geographic Questfollowing the July 2017 launch and higher charter costs. In addition, higher general and administrative expenses of $4.5 million were due primarily to higher stock based compensation associated with the CEO Share Allocation Plan, as well as executive severance costs. Excluding the impact of cancelled voyages and the delayed delivery of theNational Geographic Quest, it is estimated that operating income would have increased approximately $4.3 million or 36% over the prior year to $16.1 million.

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2015

Tour Revenues

Tour revenues decreased $2.2 million, or 1%, to $207.8 million in 2016 compared to $210.0 million in 2015. The change was primarily the result of a $2.2 million decrease in other tour revenues. Net Yield amounted to $976 in 2016 compared to $971 in 2015. The increase in Net Yield was primarily related to increased tour prices partially offset by lower occupancy and lower other tour revenues.

Operating Income

Operating income decreased $3.7 million, or 24%, to $11.8 million in 2016 compared to $15.5 million in 2015. This decrease was primarily related to $13.8 million higher operating expenses and a $2.2 million decrease in other tour revenues, partially offset by the absence of merger-related costs of $13.3 million that occurred in 2015. The higher operating expenses for 2016 were primarily related to additional personnel and public company costs and additional 2016 costs related to the accelerated depreciation for theNational Geographic Endeavour described in Item 8 of this Annual Report in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

Results of Operations – Natural Habitat Segment

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2016

Tour Revenues

Tour revenues increased $15.2 million, or 44%, to $49.7 million compared to $34.5 million in 2016 due primarily to a full twelve months of operations in 2017.

Operating Income

Operating income increased $1.3 million, or 58%, to $3.5 million in 2017 compared to $2.2 million in 2016 due primarily to a full twelve months of operations in 2017.

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2016 to December 31, 2015

Natural Habitat reported $34.5 million in tour revenues and $2.2 million in operating income for the period from May 5, 2016, the acquisition date, to December 31, 2016.

35

Adjusted EBITDA – Consolidated

The following table outlines the reconciliation to Net income and calculation of consolidated Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.The presentation of non-GAAP financial information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP.

Reconciliation of Net (Loss) Income to Adjusted EBITDA         
          
Consolidated         
  For the years ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2017  2016*  2015 
Net (loss) income $(7,529) $5,059  $19,742 
Income tax expense (benefit)  10,002   (3,200)  (2,649)
Interest expense, net  9,736   10,146   10,901 
Depreciation and amortization  17,351   18,420   11,645 
(Gain) loss on foreign currency  (1,144)  720   40 
(Gain) loss on transfer of assets  (454)  83   (7,502)
Other expense (income), net  133   1,173   (5,030)
Stock-based compensation  10,627   5,411   4,913 
National Geographic fee amortization  2,907   2,907   1,397 
Executive severance costs  1,409   -   - 
Reorganization costs  451   -   - 
Acquisition-related expenses  -   943   - 
Merger-related expenses  -   -   13,344 
Adjusted EBITDA  43,489   41,662   46,801 
Impact of voyage cancellations  9,047   -   - 
Adjusted EBITDA excluding impact of voyage cancellations $52,536  $41,662  $46,801 

* The 2016 Natural Habitat segment results represent activity from acquisition date of May 2016 through December 31, 2016.

The following tables outline the reconciliation for each segment from operating income to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:

Reconciliation of Operating Income to Adjusted EBITDA         
          
Lindblad Segment         
  For the years ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2017  2016  2015 
Operating income $7,292  $11,794  $15,502 
Depreciation and amortization  15,969   17,569   11,645 
Stock-based compensation  10,627   5,411   4,913 
National Geographic fee amortization  2,907   2,907   1,397 
Executive severance costs  1,409   -   - 
Reorganization costs  451   -   - 
Acquisition-related expenses  -   943   - 
Merger-related expenses  -   -   13,344 
Adjusted EBITDA  38,655   38,624   46,801 
Impact of voyage cancellations  9,047   -   - 
Adjusted EBITDA excluding impact of voyage cancellations $47,702  $38,624  $46,801 

36

Reconciliation of Operating Income to Adjusted EBITDA      
       
Natural Habitat Segment      
  For the years ended
December 31,
 
(In thousands) 2017  2016* 
Operating income $3,452  $2,187 
Depreciation and amortization  1,382   851 
Adjusted EBITDA $4,834  $3,038 

* The 2016 Natural Habitat segment results represent activity from acquisition date of May 2016 through December 31, 2016.

The following tables set forth our Guest Metrics for the Lindblad segment. Please refer to ourDescription of Certain Line Itemsabove for the specific definition by line item and segment.The presentation of non-GAAP financial information should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP.

 

The following table sets forth our Available Guest Nights, Guest Nights Sold, Occupancy, Maximum Guests, Number of Guests and Voyages for the Lindblad segment for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013:2015:

 

 For the Years Ended December 31,  For the years ended December 31, 
 2015  2014  2013  2017  2016  2015 
Available Guest Nights  184,366   180,206   177,135   186,719   181,990   184,366 
Guest Nights Sold  169,303   167,483   163,758   163,256   164,423   169,303 
Occupancy  91.8%  92.9%  92.4%  87.4%  90.3%  91.8%
Maximum Guests  21,459   20,216   20,858   22,805   21,715   21,459 
Number of Guests  19,824   18,819   19,327   20,140   19,735   19,824 
Voyages  281   262   265   308   290   281 

 

The following table shows the calculations of Gross Yield and Net Yield for the Lindblad segment for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013. Gross Yield is calculated by dividing tour revenues by Available Guest Nights, and Net Yield is calculated by dividing Net Revenue by Available Guest Nights.2015:

 

Calculation of Gross Yield and Net Yield       
Lindblad Segment       
       
 For the Years Ended December 31,  For the years ended December 31, 
(In thousands, except for Available Guest Nights, Gross and Net Yield) 2015  2014  2013  2017  2016  2015 
Guest ticket revenues $183,805  $173,536  $157,288  $191,113  $183,851  $183,805 
Other revenues  26,180   24,923   34,949 
Other tour revenues  25,701   23,985   26,180 
Tour Revenues 209,985  198,459  192,237   216,814   207,836   209,985 
Less: Orion Insurance Proceeds  (2,273)  -   - 
Adjusted Tour Revenues  214,541   207,836   209,985 
Less: Commissions  (14,460)  (12,941)  (13,111)  (16,365)  (14,954)  (14,460)
Less: Other expense  (16,496)  (14,403)  (14,235)
Less: Other tour expenses  (14,325)  (15,253)  (16,496)
Net Revenue $179,029  $171,115  $164,891  $183,851  $177,629  $179,029 
            
Available Guest Nights  184,366   180,206   177,135   186,719   181,990   184,366 
Gross Yield $1,139  $1,101  $1,085  $1,149  $1,142  $1,139 
Net Yield 971  950  931   985   976   971 

37

 

The following table shows the calculations of Gross Cruise Cost per Available Guest Night and Net Cruise Costs per Available Guest Night for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
(In thousands, except Available Guest Nights, Gross and Net Cruise Cost) 2015  2014  2013 
Cost of tours $95,417  $90,002  $96,655 
Plus: Merger-related expenses  13,344   -   - 
Plus: Selling and marketing  34,980   30,718   29,984 
Plus: General and administrative  39,097   36,053   30,431 
Gross Cruise Cost 182,838  156,773  157,070 
Less: Commission expense  (14,460)  (12,941)  (13,111)
Less: Other expenses  (16,496)  (14,403)  (14,235)
Net Cruise Cost  151,882  129,429  129,724 
Less: Fuel expense  (9,004)  (11,671)  (12,237)
Net Cruise Cost Excluding Fuel 142,878  117,758  117,487 
Non-GAAP Adjustments:            
Stock-based compensation  (4,913)  (274)  - 
National Geographic fee amortization  (1,397)  -   - 
Merger-related expenses  (13,344)  -   - 
Acquisition-related expenses  -   (112)  (1,306)
Retention expense  -   (2,500)  - 
Adjusted Net Cruise Cost Excluding Fuel $123,224  $114,872  $116,181 
Available Guest Nights  184,366   180,206   177,135 
Gross Cruise Cost per Available Guest Night $992  $870  $887 
Net Cruise Cost per Available Guest Night 824  718  732 
Net Cruise Cost Excluding Fuel per Available Guest Night 775  653  663 
Adjusted Net Cruise Cost per Available Guest Night 717  702  725 
Adjusted Net Cruise Cost Excl. Fuel per Available Guest Night 668  637  656 

43

The following outlines the calculation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDALindblad segment for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013.

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2015  2014  2013 
Net income $19,742  $22,245  $14,844 
Income tax (benefit) expense  (2,649)  2,800   1,663 
Interest expense, net  10,901   5,293   7,896 
Depreciation and amortization  11,645   11,266   11,645 
EBITDA  39,639   41,604   36,048 
Change in fair value of obligation to repurchase shares of common stock  -   (10)  401 
Loss (gain) on foreign currency translation  40   149   (1,281)
Gain on transfer of assets  (7,502)  -   - 
Other income  (5,030)  (57)  (1)
Stock-based compensation  4,913   274   - 
National Geographic fee amortization -non-cash  1,397   -   - 
Merger-related expenses  13,344   -   - 
Acquisition-related expenses  -   112   1,306 
Retention expenses  -   2,500   - 
Adjusted EBITDA $46,801  $44,572  $36,473 

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014

Tour Revenues

Tour revenues increased $11.5 million, or 5.8%, to $210.0 million in 2015 compared to $198.5 million in 2014. The change was primarily the result of a $10.3 million increase in guest ticket revenues to $183.8 million in 2015 from $173.5 million in 2014 from additional chartered and owned vessel voyages and an increase in tour prices, offset by a slight decrease in occupancy. Net Yield for 2015 amounted to $971 compared to $950 in 2014 with the increase primarily related to increased tour prices.

Cost of Tours

Total cost of tours increased $5.4 million, or 6.0%, to $95.4 million in 2015 from $90.0 million in 2014. This was primarily due to higher charter costs, land costs and air expense related to additional voyages offered, offset by decreases in fuel and maintenance expenditures for the owned fleet. Adjusted Net Cruise Cost per Available Guest Night increased 2.1% to $717 in 2015 compared to $702 in 2014, with the increase primarily related to higher charter costs.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by $3.0 million to $39.1 million in 2015 from $36.1 million in 2014. This increase was primarily due to a $4.6 million increase in stock options incentive compensation expense and a $1.3 million increase in professional fees for additional staffing changes and executive searches, offset by a $2.9 million decrease in bonus expense.

Selling and Marketing Expenses2015:

 

Selling and marketing expenses increased $4.3 million, or 14.0%, to $35.0 million in 2015 from $30.7 million in 2014. This increase was due to $3.6 million in higher commission expenses, which relates to a $1.4 million increase in National Geographic fee amortization in connection with the merger and a $2.2 million increase related to increased revenue from additional voyages offered, and $0.5 million in higher expense related to marketing printing and postage.

 For the years ended December 31, 
(In thousands, except for Available Guest Nights, Gross and Net Cruise Cost) 2017  2016  2015 
Cost of tours $105,044  $96,505  $95,417 
Plus: Selling and marketing  38,429   36,356   35,083 
Plus: General and administrative  50,082   45,612   38,994 
Plus: Merger-related expenses  -   -   13,344 
Gross Cruise Cost  193,555   178,473   182,838 
Less: Commission expense  (16,365)  (14,954)  (14,460)
Less: Other tour expenses  (14,325)  (15,253)  (16,496)
Net Cruise Cost  162,865   148,266   151,882 
Less: Fuel expense  (7,013)  (7,138)  (9,004)
Net Cruise Cost Excluding Fuel  155,852   141,128   142,878 
Non-GAAP Adjustments:            
Stock-based compensation  (10,627)  (5,411)  (4,913)
National Geographic fee amortization  (2,907)  (2,907)  (1,397)
Executive severance costs  (1,409)  -   - 
Acquisition-related expenses  -   (943)  - 
Merger-related expenses  -   -   (13,344)
Adjusted Net Cruise Cost Excluding Fuel $140,909  $131,867  $123,224 
Adjusted Net Cruise Cost $147,922  $139,005  $132,228 
Available Guest Nights  186,719   181,990   184,366 
Gross Cruise Cost per Available Guest Night $1,037  $981  $992 
Net Cruise Cost per Available Guest Night  872   815   824 
Net Cruise Cost Excl. Fuel per Available Guest Night  835   775   775 
Adj. Net Cruise Cost Excl. Fuel per Avail. Guest Night  755   725   668 
Adjusted Net Cruise Cost per Available Guest Night  792   764   717 

 

44

Merger-Related Expenses

Merger-related expenses in 2015 were $13.3 million, which included $8.3 million of one-time professional fees associated with the merger transaction between Lindblad and Capitol and $5.0 million in success fee compensation expense.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $0.4 million to $11.7 million in 2015 from $11.3 million in 2014 primarily related to capital additions to current vessels.

Other (Expense) Income

Other income was $1.6 million in 2015 compared to a $5.4 million expense in 2014, which represents a $7.0 million increase in other income, net. This change was primarily due to the following factors.

Additional income of $12.5 million in 2015 related to the $5.0 million success fee income for the new debt financing in May 2015 and the gain on the disposal of assets of $7.5 million related to the junior debt in the Cruise/Ferry Master Fund I, N.V. (“CFMF”) transaction.
Interest expense, net, increased $5.6 million to $10.9 million in 2015 from $5.3 million in 2014. The increase was primarily the result of higher debt levels in the second half of 2015 from our new credit agreement, as well as accelerated amortization of deferred finance costs of $1.9 million related to the repayment of our senior debt in May 2015.
In 2015, we recorded a small loss in foreign currency translation compared to $0.2 million in foreign currency translation losses in 2014. The $0.2 million net change was primarily related to the strengthening of the Australian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar.

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013

Tour Revenues

Tour revenues increased $6.3 million, or 3.3%, to $198.5 million in 2014 compared to $192.2 million in 2013. This increase was primarily due to theNational Geographic Orion providing approximately $6.0 million of additional tour revenues in its second year of operation under our management. An increase in tour revenues of approximately $6.0 million for our owned fleet was offset by a reduction in inventory for the chartered vessels that resulted in a decrease in tour revenues of approximately $6.0 million for chartered vessel revenue in 2014. Net Yield for 2014 amounted to $950 compared to $931 in 2013.

Cost of Tours

Total cost of tours decreased $6.7 million, or 6.9%, to $90.0 million in 2014 from $96.7 million in 2013. This decrease was driven by a $4.3 million reduction in charter inventory related costs as we sought to maximize yields across all of our vessels. In addition, theNational Geographic Orion experienced a $1.3 million reduction in drydock expense in 2014 compared to 2013. During 2013, the vessel underwent an extensive drydock process during which we added our own specific modifications in order for the ship to meet its operational requirements. Adjusted Net Cruise Cost per Available Guest Night decreased 3.2% to $702 in 2014 compared to $725 in 2013.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased $5.7 million to $36.1 million in 2014 from $30.4 million in 2013. This increase was primarily due to $2.5 million in payments made to certain executives as retention amounts in 2014 and no such payments were made in 2013. In addition, $1.8 million of the total increase was related to increases in salaries, headcount and certain incentive compensation payments.

45

Selling and Marketing Expenses

Selling and marketing expenses increased $0.7 million, or 2.3%, to $30.7 million in 2014 from $30.0 million in 2013. This increase was primarily due to higher expenditures in most sales and marketing categories to ensure high Occupancy and Net Yields as Available Guest Nights increased 1.7% from 177,135 in 2013 to 180,206 in 2014.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased $0.3 million to $11.3 million in 2014 from $11.6 million in 2013.

Other (Expense) Income

Other expense was $5.4 million in 2014 compared to $7.0 million in 2013, which represents a $1.6 million decrease in other (expense) income, net. This change was primarily due to the following factors.

Interest expense, net, decreased $2.6 million to $5.3 million in 2014 from $7.9 million in 2013. The decrease was due to lower average debt levels during 2014 and debt discount amortization that was $1.4 million lower in 2014 as compared to 2013.
In 2014, we recorded a $0.2 million foreign currency translation loss compared to a $1.3 million foreign currency translation gain in 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Sources and Uses of Cash for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015

 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $52.9 million in 2017 compared to $31.4 million in 2016. The $21.5 million increase was primarily due to an increase of $20.7 million in unearned revenues. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $2.8$8.9 million in 2016 to $31.4 million from $40.3 million in 2015 to $40.3 million from $43.1 million in 2014 primarily due to merger-related costs, and changes in the liabilities for unearned passenger revenue, and changes in accounts payable and accrued expenses, offset by increases related to changes in accounts payable, accrued expenses and prepaid expenses. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $9.8 million in 2014 to $43.1 million from $33.3 million in 2013 primarily due to a $7.4 million increase in net income.

 

Net cash used in investing activities was $78.5 million in 2017 compared to $86.4 million in 2016. The $7.9 million decrease was primarily related to the $9.9 million net cash used for the acquisition of Natural Habitat in 2016 offset by a $4.6 million increase in purchases of property and equipment in 2017 primarily related to growth in capital expenditures for our three newbuild vessels. Net cash used in investing activities was $86.4 million in 2016 compared to $81.5 million in 2015 compared to $29.0 million in 2014.2015. The $52.5$4.9 million increase in cash used in investing activities was primarily related to the purchase in May 2015 of our investment in CFMF and an increase in purchases of property and equipment related to growth capital expenditures. The purchase of propertyexpenditures for our two newbuild coastal vessels and equipment increase includes $10.1the $9.9 million in 2015 to build two new coastal vessels. Netnet cash used for the acquisition of Natural Habitat in investing activities increased by $18.7 million in 20142016 as compared to $29.0 million from $10.3 million in 2013 primarily due to a $25.0 million initial cash payment in connection with the purchase from DVB Bank America N.V. (“DVB”)in May 2015 of the Profit Participation Loan, which represented DVB’s interestour investment in CFMF.

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities was $208.5$13.4 million in 20152017 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $17.4$16.4 million in 2014.2016. The $225.9$3.0 million decrease was primarily related to a decrease of $4.2 million in repurchases of shares and warrants. The difference in cash used in financing activities of $16.4 million in 2016 as compared to $208.5 million of cash provided by financing activities in 2015 was primarily related to the $175.0$134.9 million innet proceeds from the newissuance of long-term debt in 2015, net of debt repayments and $186.8the $96.8 million in net proceeds from the merger, partially offset by the related $90.0 million in payments to shareholders for the merger, an increase of $41.9 million in repayments of long-term debt and the addition of $11.0 million in deferred financing costs. Net cash used in financing activities decreased $0.2 million in 2014 to $17.4 million from $17.6 million in 2013. Net cash used in 2014 included $10.5 million for the repurchase of Class B shares and a $4.0 million principal reduction on our term loans.merger.

 

 4638 

 

Contractual Commitments and ContingenciesObligations

 

As of December 31, 2015,2017, our contractual obligations were as follows:

 

 Payments due by period  Payments due by period 
(In thousands) Total  Less than 1 year  1- 3 years  3-5 years  After 5
years
  Total  2018  2019-2020  2021-2022  After 5 years 
Financing Activities:           
Long-term debt obligations $174,125  $1,750  $3,500  $3,500  $165,375 
Interest on long-term debt  49,973   9,541   18,793   18,408   3,231 
                    
Operating Activities:                               
Operating lease obligations  6,341   841   1,608   1,218   2,674  $8,074  $936  $2,248  $2,153  $2,737 
Charter commitments  18,918   8,053   9,383   1,482   -   14,575   9,334   5,241   -   - 
Other long-term liabilities  677   -   -   -   677   684   -   -   -   684 
Investing activities:                                        
Purchase obligations - Fleet expansion  118,807   69,289   49,518   -   -   141,164   33,164   108,000   -   - 
Financing Activities:                    
Long-term debt obligations  173,150   1,750   6,025   165,375   - 
Interest on long-term debt  39,997   11,888   23,156   4,953   - 
Total $368,841  $89,474  $82,802  $24,608  $171,957  $377,644  $

57,072

  $144,670  $172,481  $3,421 

  

Funding Needs and Sources

 

We have historically relied on a combination of cash flows provided by operations and the incurrence of additional debt and/or the refinancing of existing debt to fund obligations. As of December 31, 2015, we had $206.9 million in cash and cash equivalents, excluding restricted cash. As a result of the Amended Credit Agreement, we had net working capital of $130.0 million as of December 31, 2015 as compared to a working capital deficit of $59.7 million as of December 31, 2014. Similar to others in the industry, we have historically operated with a meaningful working capital deficit. TheThis historical deficit as of December 31, 2014 wasis mainly attributable to the fact that, under our business model, a vast majority of guest ticket receipts are collected in advance of the applicable sailingexpedition date. These advance passenger receipts remain a current liability until the sailing date. Theexpedition date and the cash generated from these advance receipts is used interchangeably with cash on hand from other cash from operations. The cash received as advanced receipts can be used to fund operating expenses for the applicable future sailingexpeditions or otherwise, pay down credit facilities, invest in long-term investments or any other use of cash. We had a working capital deficit of $12.7 million as of December 31, 2017. As a result of the proceeds from the Restated Credit Facility and the merger, we had a net working capital surplus of $47.1 million as of December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2017, we had $96.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, excluding restricted cash.

 

In November 2015, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a $20.0 million stock and warrant repurchase plan (“Repurchase Plan”). In November 2016, our Board of Directors authorized a $15.0 million increase to the Repurchase Plan, to $35.0 million. This Repurchase Plan authorizes us to purchase from time to time our outstanding common stock and warrants through open market repurchases in compliance with Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and/or in privately negotiated transactions discretion based on market and business conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors. Any shares and warrants purchased will be retired. The Repurchase Plan has no time deadline and will continue until otherwise modified or terminated at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors at any time. As of December 31, 2017, under this Repurchase Plan, we have cumulatively purchased 5,443,480 warrants for $14.0 million and 855,776 shares of common stock for $8.0 million, leaving $13.0 million authorized to be used to purchase our outstanding common stock and warrants pursuant to the Repurchase Plan.

In December 2015, we signed a definitive agreement for the purchase of theNational Geographic Endeavour II to be used in our operations in the Galápagos Islands. The purchase price of $18.0 million was paid on April 25, 2016 when we took possession of the ship. We repurchased 2,091,618 warrantsspent an additional $16.5 million in renovation costs, funded through cash on hand, and deployed the ship in the fourth quarter of 2015 for $5.5 million.2016.

 

In December 2015, we executed definitive agreementsThe company paid Ice Floe, LLC $53.6 million related to theNational Geographic Quest and the vessel was delivered in July of 2017. The Company amended the agreement for the constructionsecond vessel, theNational Geographic Venture, in October 2017. The current contract price is $57.0 million and the vessel is scheduled to be completed in the fourth quarter of two new coastal vessels2018, subject to extension for certain events, such as change orders. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has paid Ice Floe, LLC $23.8 million related to theNational Geographic Venture. The Company may terminate the applicable Agreement in the event the Builder fails to deliver the vessel within one hundred eighty days of the applicable due date or the Builder becomes insolvent or otherwise bankrupt. The Agreement also contains customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities.

In November 2017, the Company executed a contract to build a polar ice class vessel targeted to be competed in January 2020, with potential accelerated delivery targetedto November 2019, with a total purchase price of 1,066.0 million Norwegian Krone (NOK). Subsequently, LME exercised its right to make payments in 2017 and 2018 atUnited States Dollars, which resulted in a purchase price of $48.0$134.6 million, including hedging costs. The first twenty percent of the purchase price was paid shortly after execution of the Agreement with the remaining eighty percent due upon delivery and $46.8 million, respectively.acceptance of the vessel. The newbuildpolar ice class contract includes options to build two additional ice class vessels, the first for delivery twelve months after the initial vessel and the second for delivery twelve months thereafter. The new build process will exposeexposes us to certain risks typically associated with new ship construction, which we are prepared to manage through detailed planning and close monitoring by our internal marine team. The purchase of the ships will behas been funded through a combination of cash available on our balance sheet, our revolving credit facility and excess cash flows generated by our existing operations. We also signed a definitive agreement for the purchase of theVia Australis to be used in our operations in the Galápagos Islands. The purchase price for the ship is $18.0 million and we plan to spend up to $10.0 million to refurbish and outfit the ship immediately after closing. The purchase and refurbishment will be funded through a combination of cash available on our balance sheet and excess cash flows generated by our existing operations.

 

39

As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had approximately $164.4$173.2 million in long-term debt obligations, including the current portion of long-term debt offset by debt discounts and excluding deferred financing costs. While this added debt puts us into a higher leveraged position, weWe believe that our cash on hand, our new revolving credit facility (described below) and expected future operating cash inflows will be sufficient to fund operations, debt service requirements, capital expenditures for our newbuilds and other assets and acquisitions, and our Repurchase Plan. However, there can be no assurance that cash flows from operations will be available in the future to fund future obligations.

 

Debt Facilities

47

 

Debt CovenantsRevolving Credit Facility

 

On May 8, 2015, Lindbladwe entered into a new credit agreement with Credit Suisse A.G. (“Credit Suisse”) as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (“Credit Agreement”) for a $150.0 million facility, which was subsequently increased to $175.0 million upon syndication on July 8, 2015 (“Amended Credit Agreement”), in the form of a $155.0 million U.S. term loan (the “U.S. Term Loan”) and a $20.0 million Cayman term loan for the benefit of Lindblad’sour foreign subsidiaries (the “Cayman Loan,” and together with the U.S. Term Loan, the “Loans”). The net proceeds from the Loans, net of discounts, fees and expenses, were approximately $164.1 million. On March 7, 2016, we entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement with Credit Suisse as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (“Restated Credit Agreement”), amending our existing senior secured credit facility with Credit Suisse (“Restated Credit Facility”). The Restated Credit Facility provides for our existing $175.0 million senior secured first lien term loan facility and a new $45.0 million senior secured incremental revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”), which includes a $5.0 million letter of credit subfacility. Our obligations under the Restated Credit Facility are secured by substantially all of our assets. As of December 31, 2017 our principal balance on the Loans was $170.6 million and we had not drawn on our Restated Credit Facility.

The Loans bear interest at a rate based on an adjusted ICE Benchmark Administration LIBO Rate (subject to a floor of 1.00%) plus a spread of 4.50%. The U.S. Term Loan and the Cayman Loan bothLoans mature on May 8, 2021. The net proceeds fromBorrowings under the term loan advances were usedRevolving Credit Facility bear interest at an adjusted ICE Benchmark Administration LIBO Rate plus a spread of 4.00%, or, at our option, an alternative base rate plus a spread of 3.00%. We are also required to repay Lindblad’s existing debt, fundpay a portion of0.50% annual commitment fee on undrawn amounts under the purchase consideration paid in connection with Lindblad’s purchase of the financial and equity interests in CFMF and for general corporate purposes.Revolving Credit Facility, which matures on May 8, 2020.

 

The AmendedRestated Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that, among other things, (i) require us to maintain a total net leverage ratio (defined as on any date of determination, the ratio of total debt on such date, less up to $25.0 million of the unrestricted cash and cash equivalents to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) for the trailing 12-month period) of 4.75 to 1.00 initially, with 0.25 equal reductions annually thereafter until March 31, 2020, when the total net leverage ratio shall be 3.50 to 1.00 thereafter; (ii) limit the amount of indebtedness we may incur generally and specifically for intercompany debt, debt incurred to finance acquisitions and improvements, for capital and synthetic lease obligations, for standby letters of credit, and in connection with refinancings; (iii) limit the amount we may spend in connection with certain types of investments; and (iv) require the delivery of certain periodic financial statements and an operating budget. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the required net leverage ratio was 4.25 to 1, and we were in compliance with the financial covenants.

Senior Secured Credit Agreement

On March 7, 2016, weJanuary 8, 2018, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) and its indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Borrower”) entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement with Credit Suisse as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (“Restated Credit Agreement”), amending our existing senior secured credit facilityagreement (the “Export Credit Agreement”) with Credit SuisseCitibank, N.A., London Branch (“Restated Credit Facility”Citi”) and Eksportkreditt Norge AS (together with Citi, the “Lenders”). Pursuant to the Export Credit Agreement, the Lenders have agreed to make available to the Borrower, at the Borrower’s option and subject to certain conditions, a loan in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $107.7 million for the purpose of providing financing for up to 80% of the purchase price of the Company’s new expedition ice-class cruise vessel targeted to be completed in January 2020. Seventy percent of the loan will be guaranteed by Garantiinstituttet for Eksportkreditt, the official export credit agency of Norway. If drawn upon, the loan will be made at the time of delivery of the vessel.

40

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods and the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes. Out of our significant accounting policies, which are described in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K, certain accounting policies are deemed “critical,” as they require management’s highest degree of judgment, estimates and assumptions. While management believes its judgments, estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based on information presently available and actual results may differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

Ship Accounting

Ships, including ship improvements and ships under construction, are our most significant assets, comprising over 75% of our non-current assets at December 31, 2017. We make several critical accounting estimates with respect to our ship accounting.  Given the very large and complex nature of our ships, our accounting estimates related to ships and determinations of ship improvement costs to be capitalized require considerable judgment and are inherently uncertain.

We have to estimate the useful life of each of our ships as well as their residual values. We account for ship improvement costs by capitalizing those costs we believe add value to our ships and have a useful life greater than one year and depreciate those improvements over its estimated remaining useful life. The Restated Credit Facility providescosts of repairs and maintenance, including minor improvement costs and dry-dock expenses, are charged to expense as incurred.

If materially different conditions existed, or if we materially changed our assumptions of ship useful lives and residual values, our depreciation expense, loss on retirement of ship components and net book value of our ships would be materially different. In addition, if we change our assumptions in making our determinations as to whether improvements to a ship add value, the amounts we expense each year as repair and maintenance expense could increase, which would be partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense, resulting from a reduction in capitalized costs. We believe we have made reasonable estimates for ship accounting purposes.

Stock-Based Compensation

We estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of the grant using an option-pricing model and restricted share values and recognize the expense over the required service periods.

For recording our existing $175.0 million senior secured first lienstock-based compensation expense for service-based options, we have chosen to use:

the straight-line method of allocating compensation cost for service-based options;
the Black-Scholes option pricing formula for time-based options;
the simplified method to calculate the expected term for options;
an estimate of expected volatility based on the historical volatility of our share price; and
an estimate for expected forfeitures.

The three factors which most affect stock-based compensation are the fair value of the common stock underlying the stock options, the vesting term loan facilityof the options and the volatility of such fair value of the underlying common stock. If our estimates are too high or too low, we may overstate or understate our stock-based compensation expense.

Income Taxes

To measure deferred tax assets and liabilities, we provide a new $45.0 million senior secured incremental revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”), which includes a $5.0 million lettervaluation allowance against deferred tax assets if, based upon the weight of credit subfacility. Borrowings underavailable evidence, we do not believe it is “more-likely-than-not” that some or all of the Revolving Credit Facilitydeferred tax assets will bear interest at an adjusted ICE Benchmark administration LIBO Rate plus a spread of 4.00%, or, at our option, an alternative base rate plus a spread of 3.00%.be realized. We are also requiredwill continue to pay a 0.50% annual commitment fee on undrawn amounts underevaluate the Revolving Credit Facility, which matures on May 8, 2020. Our obligations under the Restated Credit Facility are secured by substantiallydeferred tax asset valuation allowance balances in all of our assets. The Restated Credit Agreement containsforeign and U.S. companies to determine the sameappropriate level of valuation allowances. While we believe that the amount of the recorded financial statement benefits and operational covenants astax reserves reflect the Amended Credit Agreement.more-likely-than-not criteria, it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may result in a reduction to the tax benefits previously recorded on our consolidated financial statements or may exceed the current income tax reserves in amounts that could be material.

41

 

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets

We review our long-lived assets, principally our vessels and operating rights, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the assessment of possible impairment is based on our ability to recover the carrying value of our asset, which is determined by using the asset’s estimated undiscounted future cash flows. If these estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment charge is recognized for the excess, if any, of the asset’s carrying value over its estimated fair value. A significant amount of judgment is required in estimating the future cash flows and fair values of our vessels and operating rights.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014.2016.

 

Future Application of Accounting Standards

 

Refer to Item 8 of this Annual Report Note 2 -Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements for further information onRecent Accounting Pronouncements.

 

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

We are exposed to market risk in the normal course of our business, primarily due to our international operations. The primary exposure relates to the exchange rate fluctuations between our U.S. dollar functional reporting currency and other currencies. This exposure includes trade receivables denominated in currencies other than our functional currency. To date, fluctuations in exchange rates have not had a material impact on our results of operations.

 

In addition, we have ship maintenance contracts and may, in the future, have ship construction contracts, which are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. While we have entered into, and may, in the future, enter into, forward contracts and collar options to manage a portion of the currency risk associated with these contracts, we are, or may be, exposed to fluctuations in the exchange rates for the portions of the contracts that have not been hedged. Additionally, if a shipyard is unable to perform under such a contract, any foreign currency forward contracts that were entered into to manage the currency risk would need to be terminated.

 

Due to specific geographies in which we operate and the cost of providing access to fuel in remote destinations, we have historically not experienced significant fluctuations in fuel costs with changes in world fuel commodity prices and have not historically hedged our fuel purchases.

 

We are also exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates charged on debt. The impact on earnings is subject to change as a result of movements in market rates. A hypothetical increase in interest rates of 100 basis points would result in potential reduction of future pre-tax earnings of approximately $1.7 million per year for the $174.1$170.6 million outstanding under the AmendedRestated Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2015.2017. Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will be dependent upon our future performance which, in turn, is subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors.

 

48

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

The consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedules required under Item 8 are included beginning on page F-1 of this Report.

 

Item 9.Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.

 

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2015.2017.

 

42

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

We produce our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the requirements of U.S. GAAP. ManagementOur management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting, of our company. Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports, to help mitigate the risk of fraud and to operate successfully as a publicly traded company. The design, monitoring and revision of the system of internal financial reporting controls involves, among other things, management’s judgments with respect to the relative cost and expected benefits of specific control measures. The effectiveness of the control system is supported by the selection, retention and training of qualified personnel and an organizational structure that provides an appropriate division of responsibility and formalized procedures. The system of internal accounting controls is periodically reviewed and modified in response to changing conditions. The Company used the internal control framework created by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO 2013) to define and measure the effectiveness of its internal financial reporting controls.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the year ended December 31, 2015, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e)Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and 15d-15(e)the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and our directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2017, using the criteria described in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO. Based on our evaluation under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer haveupdated internal control framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013), management concluded that during the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

 

As long as we qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined by the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012, we will not be required to obtain an auditor’s attestation report on our internal controls in future Annual Reports on Form 10-K as otherwise required by Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Accordingly, our independent registered public accounting firm did not perform an audit of our internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2017.

 

49

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

There was no change in ourthe internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarterperiod covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-Kreport that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.reporting.

 

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

 

We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

 

Item 9B.Other Information

 

None.

 

 5043 

 

PART III

 

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

Information concerning our executive officers, directors and corporate governance is incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.Shareholders.

 

Code of Conduct and Ethics

 

We have adopted Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and persons performing similar functions, and our directors. Our codes of ethics and business conduct can be found posted in the investor relations sections on our website athttp://www.expeditions.com. None of the websites referenced in this Annual Report on or the information contained therein is incorporated herein by reference. Future material amendments or waivers relating to the Code of Ethics will be disclosed on our website referenced in this paragraph within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.

 

Item 11.Item 11.Executive Compensation

 

Information is incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.Shareholders.

 

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related StockholderShareholder Matters

 

Information is incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.Shareholders.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Plan category Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights (a)
  Weighted
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
  Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)  2,041,939(2)  N/A   2,102,194(3)

(1)Information is as of December 31, 2017.
(2)Includes an aggregate of 1,086,134 unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units.
(3)Consists of shares available for issuance under our 2016 CEO Allocation Plan and our 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

Information is incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.Shareholders.

 

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

Information is incorporated herein by reference to our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.Shareholders.

 

 5144 

 

PART IV

 

Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K or incorporated herein by reference:

 

(1)Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1.

 

(2)Financial Statement Schedules.

 

None.

 

(3)Exhibits.

 

The following exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Form 10-K.

 

Number Description Included Form Filing Date
2.1 Stock Purchase Agreement, and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 9, 2015,May 4, 2016, by and among Capitol Acquisition Corp. II, ArgoLindblad Expeditions, LLC, Argo Merger Sub, Inc. and Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc., Gaiam, Inc., Gaiam Travel, Inc., and Ben Bressler.   By Reference8-KMarch 10, 2015
2.2Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 30, 2015, by and among Capitol Acquisition Corp. II, Argo Expeditions, LLC, Argo Merger Sub, Inc. and Lindblad Expeditions, Inc.By Reference 8-K May 4, 2015
2.3Amendment No. 2 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 1, 2015, by and among Capitol Acquisition Corp. II, Argo Expeditions, LLC, Argo Merger Sub, Inc. and Lindblad Expeditions, Inc.  By Reference8-KMay 4, 20155, 2016
3.1 Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. By Reference DEFM 14-A June 24, 2015
3.2 Bylaws. By Reference S-1 February 15, 2011
4.1 Specimen Common Stock Certificate. By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
4.2 Specimen Warrant Certificate. By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
4.3 Warrant Agreement. By Reference 8-K May 15, 2013
10.1 Letter Agreement signed by each of Capitol Acquisition Management 2 LLC and Mark D. Ein. By Reference 8-K May 15, 2013
10.2 Letter Agreement signed by L. Dyson Dryden. By Reference 8-K May 15, 2013

52

NumberDescriptionIncludedFormFiling Date
10.3 Form of Letter Agreement signed by each of Lawrence Calcano, Piyush Sodha and Richard C. Donaldson By Reference 8-K May 15, 2013
10.4 Investment Management Trust Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Company. By Reference 8-K May 15, 2013
10.5 Stock Escrow Agreement between the Company, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and each of Capitol Acquisition Management 2 LLC, Lawrence Calcano, Richard C. Donaldson, Piyush Sodha and L. Dyson Dryden. By Reference 8-K May 15, 2013
10.6 Registration Rights Agreement among the Company and each of Capitol Acquisition Management 2 LLC, Lawrence Calcano, Richard C. Donaldson, Piyush Sodha and L. Dyson Dryden. By Reference 8-K May 15, 2013
10.7 Sponsor Warrants Purchase Agreement among the Company, Graubard Miller and each of Capitol Acquisition Management 2 LLC, Lawrence Calcano, Richard C. Donaldson, Piyush Sodha and L. Dyson Dryden. By Reference 8-K May 15, 2013

45

NumberDescriptionIncludedFormFiling Date
10.8 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan.* By Reference DEFM 14-A June 24, 2015
10.9 Credit Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2015, among Lindblad Expeditions, Inc. and Lindblad Maritime Enterprises, Ltd. as borrowers, the lenders party thereto, and Credit Suisse AG, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent. By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
10.10 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2015, among Lindblad Expeditions, Inc. and Lindblad Maritime Enterprises, Ltd. as borrowers, the lenders from time to time party thereto, and Credit Suisse AG, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent. By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
10.11 Non-Competition Agreement between Sven-Olof Lindblad and the Company. By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
10.12 Employment Agreement between Ian Rogers and the Company and Assignment and Assumption of Option Award Agreement.* By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
10.13 Employment Agreement between Trey Byus and the Company and Assignment and Assumption of Option Award Agreement.* By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
10.14 Registration Rights Agreement between the stockholdersshareholders of Lindblad Expeditions, Inc. and Capitol Acquisitions Corp. II. By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
10.15 Alliance and License Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2011, by and between National Geographic Society and Lindblad Expeditions, Inc.† By Reference 8-K September 2, 2015
10.16 Amendment to Alliance and License Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2014, by and between National Geographic Society and Lindblad Expeditions, Inc.† By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
10.17 Second Amendment to Alliance and License Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2015, by and between National Geographic Society and Lindblad Expeditions, Inc.† By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
10.18 Tour Operator Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2011, by and between National Geographic Society and Lindblad Expeditions, Inc.† By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
10.19 Amendment to Tour Operator Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2014, by and between National Geographic Society and Lindblad Expeditions, Inc.† By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
10.20 Second Amendment to Tour Operator Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2015, by and between National Geographic Society and Lindblad Expeditions, Inc.† By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
10.21 Lindblad 2012 Stock Incentive Plan.* By Reference 8-K July 10, 2015
10.22 Form of Executive Officer Stock Option Award Agreement.* By Reference 8-K October 30, 2015
10.23 Employment Agreement by and between Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. and John T. McClain.*  By Reference8-KOctober 30, 2015

53

NumberDescriptionIncludedFormFiling Date
10.24Employment Agreement by and between Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. and Tyler Skarda.* By Reference 8-K December 2, 2015

10.2546

Number DescriptionIncludedFormFiling Date
10.24Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 7, 2016, among Lindblad Expeditions, Inc. and Lindblad Maritime Enterprises, Ltd. as borrowers, the lenders from time to time party thereto, and Credit Suisse AG, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, Citibank, N.A. as Syndication Agent and SunTrust Bank as Documentation Agent. 

By Reference

 8-K 

March 11, 2016

10.2610.25 Vessel Construction Agreement (Hull No. S189) between Lindblad Expeditions, LLC and Ice Floe, LLC, dated as of December 2, 2015.†   HerewithBy Reference 10-K March 14, 2016
10.2710.26 Vessel Construction Agreement (Hull No. S188) between Lindblad Expeditions, LLC and Ice Floe, LLC, dated as of December 2, 2015.† By Reference10-KMarch 14, 2016
10.27Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement.By Reference10-KMarch 14, 2016
10.28Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan.By Reference10-KMarch 14, 2016
10.292016 CEO Share Allocation Plan.*By ReferenceDEF 14-AApril 15, 2016
10.30Employment Agreement by and between Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. and Philip Auerbach.*By Reference8-KMay 3, 2016
10.31Employment Agreement by and between Natural Habitat, Inc., Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. and Ben Bressler.*By Reference8-KMay 5, 2016
10.32Employment Agreement by and between Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. and Craig Felenstein.*By Reference8-KJuly 27, 2016
10.33Contribution Agreement by and between Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. and Sven-Olof Lindblad.By Reference10-QAugust 8, 2016
10.34Amendment No. 3 to Alliance and License Agreement with National Geographic.††By Reference10-KMarch 7, 2017
10.35Amendment No. 4 to Alliance and License Agreement with National Geographic. ††Herewith    
10.2810.36 Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement.Shipbuilding Contract between Ulstein Verft AS and Lindblad Maritime Enterprises, Ltd. †† Herewith    
10.2910.37 Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan.Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. Employee Incentive Plan*   HerewithBy Reference 8-K April 3, 2017
10.38Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement*By Reference8-KApril 3, 2017
10.39Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement*By Reference8-KApril 3, 2017
21.1 Subsidiaries. Herewith    
23.1 Consent of Marcum LLP. Herewith    
31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Herewith    
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Herewith    
32.1 Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Herewith    
32.2 Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Herewith    
101.INS XBRL Instance Document Herewith    
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Herewith    
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Herewith    
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Herewith    
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Herewith    
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Herewith    

 

*    Management compensatory agreement.

†    Certain portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment order. An unredacted copy of the exhibit has been filed separately with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the request for confidential treatment.

††  Certain portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. An unredacted copy of the exhibit has been filed separately with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.

*Management compensatory agreement.
Certain portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment order. An unredacted copy of the exhibit has been filed separately with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the request for confidential treatment.
††Certain portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. An unredacted copy of the exhibit has been filed separately with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.

 

 5447 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 14, 2016.2, 2018.

 

 LINDBLAD EXPEDITIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
 (Registrant)
  
 By:/s/ Sven-Olof Lindblad
  Sven-Olof Lindblad
  Chief Executive Officer and President
  (Principal Executive Officer)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature Title Date
     
/s/Sven-Olof Lindblad Chief Executive Officer and Director March 14, 20162, 2018
Sven-Olof Lindblad (Principal Executive Officer)  
     
/s/John T. McClain  Craig I. Felenstein Chief Financial Officer March 14, 20162, 2018
John T. McClainCraig I. Felenstein (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  
     
/s/ Bernard W. Aronson Director March 14, 20162, 2018
Bernard W. Aronson    
     
/s/ Paul J. Brown  Elliott Bisnow  Director March 14, 20162, 2018
Paul J. BrownElliott Bisnow    
     
/s/L. Dyson Dryden  Director March 14, 20162, 2018
L. Dyson Dryden    
     
/s/ Mark D. Ein  Chairman of the Board March 14, 20162, 2018
Mark D. Ein    
     
/s/ John M. Fahey Jr. Daniel J. Hanrahan Director March 14, 20162, 2018
Daniel J. Hanrahan
/s/ John M. Fahey Jr. DirectorMarch 2, 2018
John M. Fahey Jr.
/s/ Catherine B. Reynolds DirectorMarch 2, 2018
Catherine B. Reynolds    

 

 5548 

 

LINDBLAD EXPEDITIONS HOLDINGS, INC.

 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20152017 and 20142016F-3
Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015F-4
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-8F-7

 

 F-1 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Audit Committee of the

Board of Directors and Shareholders

of Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013. in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidatedthe Company’s financial statements based on our audits.audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included considerationAs part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An

Our audit also includesincluded performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our auditsaudit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.Marcumllp

 

/s/ Marcum LLP

/s/ Marcum LLP

 

Marcum LLPWe have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.

Melville, NY

March 14, 20162, 2018

 

 F-2 


 

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.LINDBLAD EXPEDITIONS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

        

 As of  December 31, 
 2015  2014  As of December 31, 
      2017  2016 
ASSETS          
Current Assets:          
Cash and cash equivalents $206,903  $39,679  $96,443  $135,416 
Restricted cash and marketable securities  8,460   8,335   7,057   9,015 
Inventories  1,746   1,700   1,794   1,665 
Marine operating supplies  4,969   5,078   5,045   4,142 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  12,266   11,321   21,351   20,782 
Total current assets  234,344   66,113   131,690   171,020 
                
Property and equipment, net  125,471   121,873   250,952   186,236 
Due from shareholder  -   1,501 
Goodwill  22,105   22,105 
Intangibles, net  9,554   11,132 
Other long-term assets  12,355   2,019   10,047   13,090 
Operating rights  6,227   6,529 
Deferred tax assets  3,216   102   -   4,118 
Investment in CFMF  -   47,788 
Total assets $381,613  $245,925  $424,348  $407,701 
                
LIABILITIES                
Current Liabilities:                
Unearned passenger revenues $76,604  $73,195  $112,238  $91,501 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  25,968   20,028   30,422   30,662 
Long-term debt - current  1,750   4,934   1,750   1,750 
Obligation to repurchase shares of common stock  -   4,966 
Due to CFMF  -   22,733 
Total current liabilities  104,322   125,856   144,410   123,913 
                
Long-term debt, less current portion  162,693   51,756   164,186   164,128 
Deferred tax liabilties  2,444   - 
Other long-term liabilities  677   447   684   681 
Deferred income taxes - long-term  -   299 
Total liabilities  267,692   178,358   311,724   288,722 
                
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES                
                
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized;
0 shares issued and outstanding
  -   - 
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized;
45,224,881 and 44,717,759 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively
  5   5 
REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST  6,302   5,170 
        
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding     -       -  
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 45,427,030 and 45,659,762 issued; 44,787,608 and 45,470,219 outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively        5           5   
Additional paid-in capital  48,073   21,461   42,498   43,097 
Retained earnings  65,843   46,101   63,819   70,707 
Total shareholders' equity  113,921   67,567 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $381,613  $245,925 
Total stockholders’ equity  106,322   113,809 
Total liabilities, stockholders’ equity and redeemable noncontrolling interest $424,348  $407,701 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 F-3 

 

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.LINDBLAD EXPEDITIONS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 For the Years Ended December 31,  For the years ended December 31, 
 2015  2014  2013  2017  2016  2015 
                
Tour revenues $209,985  $198,459  $192,237  $266,504  $242,346  $209,985 
            
Cost of tours  95,417   90,002   96,655   135,526   118,977   95,417 
Gross profit  114,568   108,457   95,582   130,978   123,369   114,568 
                        
Operating expenses:                        
General and administrative  39,097   36,053   30,431   60,529   51,896   38,994 
Selling and marketing  34,980   30,718   29,984   42,354   39,072   35,083 
Depreciation and amortization  17,351   18,420   11,645 
Merger-related expenses  13,344   -   -   -   -   13,344 
Depreciation and amortization  11,645   11,266   11,645 
Total operating expenses  99,066   78,037   72,060   120,234   109,388   99,066 
                        
Operating income  15,502   30,420   23,522   10,744   13,981   15,502 
                        
Other (expense) income:                        
Change in fair value of obligation to repurchase shares of common stock  -   10   (401)
(Loss) gain on foreign currency  (40)  (149)  1,281 
Gain on transfer of assets  7,502   -   - 
Other income, net  5,030   57   1 
Interest expense, net  (10,901)  (5,293)  (7,896)  (9,736)  (10,146)  (10,901)
Total other income (expense)  1,591   (5,375)  (7,015)
Gain (loss) on foreign currency  1,144   (720)  (40)
Gain (loss) on transfer of assets  454   (83)  7,502 
Other (expense) income  (133)  (1,173)  5,030 
Total other (expense) income  (8,271)  (12,122)  1,591 
                        
Income before income taxes  17,093   25,045   16,507   2,473   1,859   17,093 
Income tax expense (benefit)  10,002   (3,200)  (2,649)
                        
Income tax (benefit) expense  (2,649)  2,800   1,663 
Net (loss) income $(7,529) $5,059  $19,742 
                        
Net income $19,742  $22,245  $14,844 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest  1,132   195   - 
                        
Common stock            
Net income available to common stockholders $19,742  $19,551  $12,988 
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders $(8,661) $4,864  $19,742 
                        
Weighted average shares outstanding                        
Basic  44,917,829   44,717,759   44,717,759   44,576,912   45,649,971   44,917,829 
Diluted  45,575,387   44,717,759   44,717,759   44,576,912   46,456,921   45,575,387 
                        
Earnings per share            
Net (loss) income per share available to common stockholders            
Basic $0.44  $0.44  $0.29  $(0.19) $0.11  $0.44 
Diluted $0.43  $0.44  $0.29  $(0.19) $0.10  $0.43 
            
Class B common stock            
Net income available to Class B common stockholders $-  $2,694  $1,856 
            
Weighted average shares outstanding            
Basic  -   6,161,135   6,388,677 
Diluted  -   6,161,135   6,388,677 
            
Earnings per share            
Basic $-  $0.44  $0.29 
Diluted $-  $0.44  $0.29 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 F-4 

 

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.LINDBLAD EXPEDITIONS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated StatementStatements of Shareholders’Stockholders’ Equity

(In thousands)

              Accumulated    
     Class B  Additional     Other  Total 
  Common Stock  Common Stock  Paid-In  Retained  Comprehesive  Shareholders' 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Earnings  Income  Equity 
Balance as of December 31, 2012  44,717,759  $5   6,388,677  $-  $43,990  $9,012  $156  $53,163 
Distribution to CFMF - common acquisition of FPH  -   -   -   -   (12,278)  -   (187)  (12,465)
Change in comprehensive income  -   -   -   -   -   -   31   31 
Net income  -   -   -   -   -   14,844   -   14,844 
Balance as of December 31, 2013  44,717,759  5   6,388,677  -  31,712  23,856  -  55,573 
Stock-based compensation - option shares  -   -   -   -   274   -   -   274 
Repurchase of Class B shares  -   -   (6,388,677)  -   (10,525)  -   -   (10,525)
Net income  -   -   -   -   -   22,245   -   22,245 
Balance as of December 31, 2014  44,717,759  5   -  -  21,461  46,101  -  67,567 
Stock-based compensation - option shares  -   -   -   -   4,913   -   -   4,913 
CFMF transaction cancellation of warrant  -   -   -   -   (83,467)  -   -   (83,467)
Obligation to repurchase shares of common stock  -   -   -   -   4,966   -   -   4,966 
Merger recapitalization  -   -   -   -   200,558   -   -   200,558 

Payments to shareholders for merger

  -   -   -   -   (90,000)  -   -   (90,000)
Option shares exercise and exchange  507,122   -   -   -   (4,880)  -   -   (4,880)
Repurchase of warrants  -   -   -   -   (5,478)  -   -   (5,478)
Net income  -   -   -   -   -   19,742   -   19,742 
Balance as of December 31, 2015  45,224,881  $5   -  $-  $48,073  $65,843  $-  $113,921 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

thousands, except share data)

 

F-5

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities         
Net income $19,742  $22,245  $14,844 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization  11,645   11,266   11,645 
Amortization of National Geographic fee  1,397   -   - 
Amortization of debt discount and deferred financing costs  3,576   744   2,142 
Stock-based compensation  4,913   274   - 
Deferred income taxes  (3,413)  289   (93)
Loss (gain) on currency translation  40   149   (1,281)
Gain on transfer of assets  (7,502)  -   - 
Change in fair value of obligation to repurchase shares of            
Class A common stock  -   -   401 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities            
Inventories and marine operating supplies  (163)  (831)  334 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (1,100)  (2,420)  2,173 
Unearned passenger revenues  3,723   8,750   3,956 
Other long-term liabilities  230   184   119 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  7,214   2,404   (943)
             
Net cash provided by operating activities  40,302   43,054   33,297 
             
Cash Flows From Investing Activities            
Purchase of investment in CFMF  (68,087)  (25,055)  - 
Acquisition of Fillmore, net of cash acquired  -   -   (3,835)
Purchase of property and equipment  (14,800)  (5,922)  (6,353)
Advance from (to) shareholder  1,501   517   (94)
(Redemption) purchase of restricted cash and marketable securities  (125)  1,458   (23)
             
Net cash used in investing activities  (81,511)  (29,002)  (10,305)
             
Cash Flows From Financing Activities            
Proceeds from long-term debt  175,000   -   - 
Net proceeds from merger  186,806   -   - 

Payments to shareholders for the merger

  (90,000)  -   - 
Deferred financing costs  (11,045)  -   (653)
Repayments of Participation Certificates  -   -   (3,550)
Repayments of long-term debt  (41,879)  (3,989)  (13,392)
Proceeds used in exchange of option shares  (4,880)  -   - 
Repurchase of warrants  (5,478)  -   - 
Repurchase of stock from common shareholders  -   (1,876)  - 
Repurchase of stock from Class B shareholders  -   (10,525)  - 
Repayment of due to stockholder  -   (1,000)  - 
             
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  208,524   (17,390)  (17,595)
             
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash  (91)  (1,337)  (1,550)
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  167,224   (4,675)  3,847 
             
Cash and cash equivalents as of beginning of period  39,679   44,354   40,507 
             
Cash and cash equivalents as of end of period $206,903  $39,679  $44,354 

Continued

F-6

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows-Continued

(In thousands)

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
          
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:         
Cash paid during the period for:         
Interest $7,003  $4,844  $5,231 
             
Income taxes $379  $1,102  $1,575 
             
Non-cash investing and financing activities:            
Acquisition of Fillmore:            
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed:            
Current assets, including cash acquired $-  $-  $6,488 
Property and equipment  -   -   53,302 
Unearned passenger revenues  -   -   (12,332)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  -   -   (3,459)
Total purchase price consideration  -   -   43,999 
             
Cash paid to acquire Fillmore  -   -   (5,000)
Non-cash consideration $-  $-  $38,999 
Non-cash consideration consisted of:            
Long-term debt $-  $-  $25,000 
Equity contribution from CFMF  -   -   13,823 
Contribution during the year ended December 31, 2012  -   -   (26,100)
Equity (distribution) contribution to CFMF $-  $-  $(12,277)
             
Investment to CFMF $-  $22,733  $- 
Due to CFMF  -   (22,733)  - 
Investment in CFMF liquidation of Junior debt asset, warrant  84,903   -   - 
CFMF liquidation of Junior debt long-term debt, additional paid-in capital  (84,903)  -   - 
Transfer from inventories and marine operating supplies  (414)  -   - 
Transfer to property and equipment, net  414   -   - 
Additional paid-in capital exercise proceeds of option shares  2,240   -   - 
Additional paid-in capital exchange proceeds used for option shares  (2,240)  -   - 
  Common Stock  Additional Paid-In  Retained  Total Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Earnings  Equity 
Balance as of December 31, 2014  44,717,759  $     4  $21,461  $46,101  $67,567 
Stock-based compensation  -   -   4,913   -   4,913 
CFMF transaction cancellation of warrant  -   -   (83,467)  -   (83,467)
Obligation to repurchase shares of common stock  -   -   4,966   -   4,966 
Merger recapitalization  -   -   200,558   -   200,558 
Payments to stockholders for merger  -   -   (90,000)  -   (90,000)
Issuance of stock for equity compensation plans  507,122   1   (4,880)  -   (4,880)
Repurchase of warrants  -   -   (5,478)  -   (5,478)
Net income  -   -   -   19,742   19,742 
Balance as of December 31, 2015  45,224,881   5   48,073   65,843   113,921 
Stock-based compensation  199,044   -   5,411   -   5,411 
Issuance of stock for equity compensation plans  280,347   -   (2,694)  -   (2,694)
Repurchase of shares and warrants  (308,718)  -   (10,343)  -   (10,343)
Acquisition of Natural Habitat, Inc.  264,208   -   2,650   -   2,650 
Net income  -   -   -   4,864   4,864 
Balance as of December 31, 2016  45,659,762   5   43,097   70,707   113,809 
Stock-based compensation  -   -   10,627   -   10,627 
Issuance of stock for equity compensation plans  314,326   -   (5,034)  -   (5,034)
Repurchase of shares and warrants  (547,058)  -   (6,192)  -   (6,192)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle  -   -   -   1,773   1,773 
Net loss  -   -   -   (8,661)  (8,661)
Balance as of December 31, 2017  45,427,030  $5  $42,498  $63,819  $106,322 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 F-7F-5 

 

LINDBLAD EXPEDITIONS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

  For the years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities         
Net (loss) income $(7,529) $5,059  $19,742 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization  17,351   18,420   11,645 
Amortization of National Geographic fee  2,907   2,907   1,397 
Amortization of deferred financing costs and other, net  2,226   1,144   3,576 
Stock-based compensation  10,627   5,411   4,913 
Deferred income taxes  8,336   (3,326)  (3,413)
(Gain) loss on foreign currency  (1,144)  720   40 
Loss (gain) on disposal and transfer of assets  -   819   (7,502)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities            
Inventories and marine operating supplies  (1,036)  1,073   (163)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  575   629   (1,100)
Unearned passenger revenues  20,709   245   3,723 
Other long-term assets  136   (3,642)  - 
Other long-term liabilities  3   4   230 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  (243)  1,964   7,214 
Net cash provided by operating activities  52,918   31,427   40,302 
             
Cash Flows From Investing Activities            
Purchases of property and equipment  (80,485)  (75,933)  (14,800)
Redemption of restricted cash and marketable securities  1,958   (555)  (125)
Acquisition  of Natural Habitat, Inc., net of $4,904 cash acquired  -   (9,946)  - 
Purchase of investment in CFMF  -   -   (68,088)
Advance from stockholder  -   -   1,501 
Net cash used in investing activities  (78,527)  (86,434)  (81,512)
             
Cash Flows From Financing Activities            
Repurchase of common stock and warrants  (6,192)  (10,343)  (5,478)
Repurchase under stock-based compensation plans and related tax impacts  (5,034)  (2,694)  (4,879)
Repayments of long-term debt  (1,750)  (1,750)  (41,879)
Payment of deferred financing costs  (418)  (1,565)  (11,045)
Proceeds from long-term debt  -   -   175,000 
Net proceeds from merger  -   -   186,806 
Payments to stockholders for the merger  -   -   (90,000)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (13,394)  (16,352)  208,525 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash  30   (128)  (91)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (38,973)  (71,487)  167,224 
             
Cash and cash equivalents as of beginning of year  135,416   206,903   39,679 
             
Cash and cash equivalents as of end of year $96,443  $135,416  $206,903 
             
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:            
Cash paid during the year for:            
Interest $10,478  $9,896  $7,003 
Income taxes $965  $998  $379 
             
Non-cash investing and financing activities:            
Additional paid-in capital exercise proceeds of option shares $1,682  $1,123  $2,240 
Additional paid-in capital exchange proceeds used for option shares $(1,682) $(1,123) $(2,240)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

NOTE 1 – BUSINESS

 

Organization

 

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. and its wholly-ownedconsolidated subsidiaries (the “Company” or “LEX”“Lindblad”) currently operate a fleet of sixseven owned expedition ships owned by its subsidiaries and fourfive seasonal charter vessels. LEX’svessels under the Lindblad brand.

Lindblad’s mission is offeringto offer life-changing adventures on all seven continents and pioneering innovative ways to allow its guests to connect with exotic and remote places. LEX’sThe Company’s expedition ships are customized, nimble and intimately-scaled vessels that are able to venture where larger cruise ships cannot, thus allowing LEXLindblad to offer up-close experiences in the planet’s wild and remote places and capitals of culture. Many of these expeditions involve travel to remote places with limited infrastructure and ports (such as Antarctica and the Arctic) or places that are best accessed by a ship (such as the Galápagos, Alaska, Baja’s Sea of Cortez, Costa Rica and Panama), and foster active engagement by guests. Each expedition ship is designed to be comfortable and inviting, while being fully equipped with state-of-the-art tools for in-depth exploration. The Company also has an alliance with the National Geographic SocietyPartners (“National Geographic”), whowhich often provides lecturers and National Geographic experts, including photographers, writers, marine biologists, naturalists, field researchers and film crews.

Lindblad Expeditions, Inc. (“Lindblad”), a New York corporation, was founded in 1979 by Sven-Olof Lindblad (“Mr. Lindblad”), whose father, adventure-travel pioneer Lars-Eric Lindblad, led some of the first non-scientific groups of travelers to Antarctica in 1966 and the Galápagos in 1967. Mr. Lindblad founded Lindblad in order to offer innovative and educational travel expeditions to the world’s most remarkable places.

 

CompletionNatural Habitat Acquisition

On May 4, 2016, the Company acquired an 80.1% ownership interest in Natural Habitat, Inc. (“Natural Habitat”), an adventure travel and ecotourism company based in Colorado. Natural Habitat was founded by Benjamin L. Bressler (“Mr. Bressler”), who retains a 19.9% noncontrolling interest in Natural Habitat. With the acquisition of Natural Habitat, the Company expanded its itineraries to include land-based offerings around the globe. Natural Habitat’s expeditions include polar bear tours in Churchill, Canada, Alaskan grizzly bear adventures, small-group Galápagos tours and African safaris. In addition to its land offerings, Natural Habitat offers select itineraries on seven small chartered vessels for parts of the year. Natural Habitat has partnered with World Wildlife Fund (“WWF”) to offer conservation travel, sustainable travel that directly protects nature.

Merger with Capitol

 

Capitol Acquisition Corp. II (“Capitol”) was originally incorporated in Delaware on August 9, 2010 as a blank check company to acquire, through a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, plan of arrangement, recapitalization, reorganization or other similar business combination, one or more businesses or entities.

 

On July 8, 2015, Capitol completed a series of mergers whereby Lindblad Expeditions, Inc. (“LEX”) became Capitol’s wholly-owned subsidiary. As consideration for the mergers, the total purchase price consisted of an aggregate of (i) $90.0 million in cash (a portion of which was paid as transaction bonuses) and (ii) 20,017,787 shares of Capitol common stock. Capitol also assumed outstanding LindbladLEX stock options and converted such options into options to purchase an aggregate of 3,821,696 shares of Capitol common stock with an exercise price of $1.76 per share (see Note 12 – Shareholders’ Equity). The Company has completed an analysis of the ownership change under Internal Revenue Code Section 382, and it allows the Company to utilize Capitol’s net operating losses with minor limitations.share.

 

As a result of the mergers, LindbladLEX became a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Capitol. Immediately following the mergers, Capitol, which was a blank check company withhad no operations, changed its name to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. and therefore we haveLindblad has presented Lindblad’sLEX’s information as that of the Company.

The Company’s common stock and warrants are listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbols “LIND” and “LINDW,” respectively.

Capitol Initial Public Offering and Warrants

In connection with its initial public offering, on May 15, 2013, Capitol sold 20,000,000 units at $10.00 per unit, including 2,000,000 units under the underwriters’ over-allotment option, generating gross proceeds of $200.0 million. Each unit consisted of one share of Capitol’s common stock, $0.0001 par value, and one half of one redeemable warrant to purchase one share of common stock. The shares of common stock and the warrants included in the units traded as a unit until July 1, 2013 when separate trading of common stock and warrants began. In connection with the consummation of the merger with Lindblad, Capitol forced the separation of the units into the separate components of common stock and warrants. Each whole warrant entitles its holder, upon exercise, to purchase one share of common stock for $11.50 subject to certain adjustments, during the period that commenced thirty days after the completion by the Company of the Business Combination with Lindblad and terminating on the five-year anniversary of the completion by the Company of the Business Combination with Lindblad. At December 31, 2015, there were 14,008,382 warrants outstanding.

F-8

The warrants may be redeemed by the Company, at its option, in whole and not in part, at a price of $0.01 per warrant at any time the warrants are exercisable, upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption, if, and only if, the last sales price of the Company’s shares of common stock equals or exceeds $24.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations and recapitalizations) for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending three business days before the Company sends the redemption notice; and if, and only if, there is a current registration statement in effect with respect to the shares of common stock underlying such warrants.

If the Company calls the warrants for redemption as described above, the Company’s management will have the option to require all holders that wish to exercise warrants to do so on a “cashless basis.” In such event, each holder would pay the exercise price by surrendering the warrants for that number of shares of common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of shares of common stock underlying the warrants, multiplied by the difference between the exercise price of the warrants and the fair market value by (y) the fair market value. The fair market value will mean the average reported last sale price of the shares of common stock for the five trading days ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of warrants.

Certain of the outstanding warrants were privately acquired from the Company by Capitol’s sponsor and certain of the Company’s initial officers and directors and are identical to the warrants included in the units sold in the offering except that such warrants: (i) are not be redeemable by the Company and (ii) may be exercised for cash or on a cashless basis, in each case so long as they are held by the initial purchasers or any of their permitted transferees.

New Credit Agreement

On May 8, 2015, Lindblad entered into a new credit agreement with Credit Suisse A.G. (“Credit Suisse”) as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (“Credit Agreement”) for a $150.0 million facility in the form of a $130.0 million U.S. term loan (the “U.S. Term Loan”) and a $20.0 million Cayman term loan for the benefit of Lindblad’s foreign subsidiaries (the “Cayman Loan,” and together with the U.S. Term Loan, the “Loans”). On July 8, 2015, the Company entered into a larger and syndicated amended and restated credit agreement with Credit Suisse (“Amended Credit Agreement”), increasing the facility by $25.0 million, resulting in a $155.0 million U.S. Term Loan. On March 7, 2016, the Company entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement with Credit Suisse (“Restated Credit Agreement”), adding a $45.0 million revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”). See Note – Long-Term Debt for more details.

Stock and Warrant Repurchase Plan

On November 9, 2015, the Company announced that its Board of Directors has approved a $20.0 million stock and warrant repurchase plan (“Repurchase Plan”). This Repurchase Plan authorizes the Company to purchase from time to time the Company’s outstanding common stock and warrants through open market repurchases in compliance with Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and/or in privately negotiated transactions discretion based on market and business conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors. Any shares and warrants purchased will be retired. The Repurchase Plan has no time deadline and will continue until otherwise modified or terminated at the sole discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors at any time. The Company repurchased 2,091,618 warrants in the fourth quarter of 2015 for $5.5 million. In January 2016, the Company repurchased 1,967,445 warrants for $5.4 million.

F-9

 

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

 

The merger with LindbladLEX has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with U.S. GAAP, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805-40-45.acquisition. Under this method of accounting, Capitol has been treated as the “acquired” company for financial reporting purposes. This determination was primarily based on LindbladLEX comprising the ongoing operations and assets of the combined entity and LindbladLEX senior management comprising the senior management of the combined company. In accordance with guidance applicable to these circumstances, the merger has been considered to be a capital transaction in substance. Accordingly, for accounting purposes, the merger has been treated as the equivalent of LindbladLEX issuing shares for the net assets of Capitol, accompanied by a recapitalization. The net assets of Capitol have been stated at historical cost, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded. Operations prior to the merger are those of Lindblad.LEX. Additionally, the historical financial statements of LindbladLEX are now reflected as those of the Company.

 

F-7

Principles of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2015 included Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. and its wholly-ownedconsolidated subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements of the CompanyNatural Habitat’s balance sheet as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013results of operations for the period beginning May 5, 2016 and ending December 31, 2016 are included Lindblad, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lindblad Maritime Enterprises, Ltd (“LME”), a Cayman Islands corporation, as well asin the subsidiaries of LME, andSea Lion andSea Bird as variable interest entities (“VIEs”). Lindblad controlled the activities which most significantly impacted the economic performance ofSea Lion andSea Bird. Lindblad determined itself to be the primary beneficiary and accordingly, these entities were determined to be VIEs. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The VIEs were transferred to Lindblad and became wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company at the merger date, July 8, 2015.Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

Reclassifications

 

Certain items in the consolidated financial statements of the CompanyWe have been reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to the 2015 classification. The reclassifications hadcurrent period presentation, with no effectimpact on previously reported results of operationsconsolidated net income or retained earnings.

cash flows.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets, and liabilities, as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, and also affect the amounts of revenues and expenses reported for each period.expenses. Actual results could differ from those which result from using such estimates. Management utilizes various estimates including but not limited toinclude determining the estimated lives of long-lived assets, determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, the fair value of the Company’s common stock and related warrants, the valuation of securities underlying stock-based compensation, income tax expense, the valuation of deferred tax assets, the value of contingent consideration and to assessassessing its litigation, other legal claims and contingencies. The results of any changes in accounting estimates are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period in which the changes become evident. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period that they are determined to be necessary.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Tour revenues consist of guest ticket revenues recognized from the sale of guest tickets and other tour revenues from the sale of pre- and post-expedition excursions, hotel accommodations, land-based expeditions, air transportation to and from the ships, goods and services rendered onboard that are not included in guest ticket prices, insurance proceeds, trip insurance and cancellation fees. RevenueRevenues from the sale of guest tickets and other revenuetour revenues are recognized gross, as the Company has the primary obligation in the arrangement, has discretion in supplier selection and is involved in the determination of the service specifications.

F-10

 

The Company’s tour guests remit deposits in advance of tour embarkation. Guest tour deposits consist of guest ticket revenues as well as revenues from the sale of pre- and post-expedition excursions, hotel accommodations, land-based expeditions, air transportation to and from the ships, and trip insurance. Guest tour deposits represent unearned revenues and are initially included inas unearned passenger revenuerevenues in the consolidated balance sheet when received. Guest deposits are subsequently recognized as tour revenues on the date of embarkation. Tour expeditions average ten days in duration. For tours in excess of ten days, where the tour days span a quarter end or year end, the Company recognizes revenue based upon expeditionsexpedition days earned. Guest cancellation fees are recognized as tour revenues at the time of the cancellation. Revenues from the sale of additional goods and services rendered onboard are recognized upon purchase.

 

Insurance

 

The Company maintains insurance to cover a number of risks including illness and injury to crew, guest injuries, pollution, other third-party claims in connections with its tour expedition activities, damages to hull and machinery for each of its vessels, war risks, workers’ compensation, employee health, directorsdirectors’ and officersofficers’ liability, property damages and general liabilities for third-party claims. The Company recognizes insurance recoverablesrecoverable from third-party insurers for incurred expenses at the time the recovery is probable and upon realization for amounts in excess of incurred expenses. All of the Company’s insurance policies are subject to coverage limits, exclusions and deductible levels.

 

TheFor the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company self-insures for medical insurance claims up to $100,000 and $60,000, respectively. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and cancellation insurance extended to guests. The2016 the Company hasmaintains Stop Loss coverage for medical claims in excess of the $100,000 and $60,000, amount. In 2015,respectively, which have an aggregate deductible of $57,500. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded a liability for Incurred-But-Not-Recorded (“IBNR”) medical claims, which was determined based on claims experience over the prior threefour years.

The Company also extends cancellation insurance to guests. The Company uses an insurance company to manage passenger insurance purchased to cover a variety of insurable losses including cancellations, interruption, missed connections, travel delays, accidental death and dismemberment, medical coverage and baggage issues. The Company is self-insured for the claims only which cover cancellations, interruption, missed connections and travel delays. The required reserve was determined based on claims experience over the prior four years. While the Company believes its estimated IBNR and accrued claims reserves are adequate, the ultimate losses may differ.

 

F-8

The Company participates in a traditional marine industry reinsurance solution for liability exposure through their Protection and Indemnity (“P&I Club”) Reinsurers, which are similar to mutual marine P&I Club’s that join and severally indemnify each other to provide discounted primary and excess Protection and Indemnity coverage to club members. The resulting aggregated surplus of the clubs combines to provide the Company with below market primary and high excess liability coverage for covered losses. For consideration of long-term below market P&I rates, the joint and several liability obligation requires the down streamdown-stream indemnification by their members, including the Company.

 

SellingGeneral and Administrative Expense

Administrative expenses primarily represent the costs of our shore-side vessel support, reservations and other administrative functions, and includes salaries and related benefits, professional fees and occupancy costs.

Selling and Marketing Expense

 

Selling and marketing expenses include commissions and a broad range of advertising and marketing expenses. These include direct mail, print and online advertising costs, as well as costs associated with website development and maintenance. Also included are social media and corporate sponsorship costs. Advertising is charged to expense as incurred. Advertising expenses totaled $12.9$16.4 million, $12.5$14.7 million and $12.1$13.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively. The largest component of advertising expense was direct mail, which totaled $5.8$6.3 million, $5.8$5.5 million and $5.5$5.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

 

Administrative expenses represent the costs of our shore-side vessel support, reservations and other administrative functions, and incudes salaries and related benefits, professional fees, and occupancy costs, which are typically expensed as incurred.

F-11

Earnings per Common Share

 

Earnings per common share areis computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share areis computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and, if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares consist of the dilutive incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options (if such option is an equity instrument, using the treasury stock method). For the year ended December 31, 2017, there were no dilutive shares because the Company had a net loss. For the years ended 2016 and 2015, the Company determined, using the treasury method, there were 806,950 and 657,558, respectively, of dilutive common shares related to stock options. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company determined there were no dilutive potential common shares.

In 2014 and 2013, the two-class method was used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Under the two-class method, earnings per common share were allocated to the Class A (common as a result of the merger) and Class B common shareholders of Lindblad based on the weighted average shares outstanding.stock-based compensation.

 

On July 8, 2015, as a result of the mergers in accordance with FASB ASC 805-40-45 and related to the reverse merger treatment and recapitalization, all historical weighted average common shares were adjusted by the exchange ratios established by the merger agreement.

 

Weighted average shares outstanding after the mergers excluded the shares underlying the outstanding warrants. TheAs of December 31, 2017 and 2016, 10,656,520 and 11,186,387 warrants, have an exerciserespectively, to purchase common stock at a price of $11.50 per share were outstanding. The Company determined these warrants were anti-dilutive and were anti-dilutive.

Basicnot considered in the calculation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding prioroutstanding.

Prior to the mergers, basic weighted average shares outstanding included the shares underlying a warrant to purchase 60% of the outstanding common shares. As the shares underlying this warrant could have been issued for little consideration (an aggregate exercise price of $10.00), these shares were formerly deemed to be issued for purposes of basic earnings per share. Effective May 8, 2015, in connection with LindbladLEX closing on a transaction to purchase 100% of Cruise/Ferry Master Fund I, N.V. (“CFMF”), the warrant was cancelled. On July 8, 2015, as a result of the merger agreement, and the reverse merger treatment and recapitalization, these shares were not considered part of the recapitalization and therefore not included in basic or dilutive weighted average shares outstanding. For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company excluded 1,912,833 (converted from 6,747 shares as a result of the merger) shares of common stock as these shares were subject to the warrants described above.

 

 F-12F-9 

 

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, the Company calculated earnings per share in accordance with FASB ASC 260 and 805-40-45 as follows:

 

 For the Years Ended December 31,  For the years ended December 31, 
(In thousands, except per share data) 2015  2014  2013 
Net income for basic and diluted earnings per share $19,742  $22,245  $14,844 
(In thousands, except share and per share data) 2017  2016  2015 
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders $(8,661) $4,864  $19,742 
                        
Weighted average shares outstanding:                        
Shares outstanding, weighted for time outstanding  44,917,829   50,878,894   51,106,436 
Total weighted average shares outstanding, basic  44,917,829   50,878,894   51,106,436   44,576,912   45,649,971   44,917,829 
                        
Effect of dilutive securities:                        
Assumed exercise of stock options, treasury method  657,558   -   -   -   782,565   657,558 
Assumed exercise of restricted shares, RSU’s, treasury method  -   24,385   - 
Dilutive potential common shares  657,558   -   -   -   806,950   657,558 
Total weighted average shares outstanding, diluted  45,575,387   50,878,894   51,106,436   44,576,912   46,456,921   45,575,387 
                        
Common stock            
Net income available to common stockholders $19,742  $19,551  $12,988 
            
Weighted average shares outstanding            
Net (loss) income per share available to Lindblad            
Basic  44,917,829   44,717,759   44,717,759  $(0.19) $0.11  $0.44 
Diluted  45,575,387   44,717,759   44,717,759  $(0.19) $0.10  $0.43 
            
Earnings per share            
Basic $0.44  $0.44  $0.29 
Diluted $0.43  $0.44  $0.29 
            
Class B common stock            
Net income available to Class B common stockholders $-  $2,694  $1,856 
            
Weighted average shares outstanding            
Basic  -   6,161,135   6,388,677 
Diluted  -   6,161,135   6,388,677 
            
Earnings per share            
Basic $-  $0.44  $0.29 
Diluted $-  $0.44  $0.29 

 

As of December 31, 2015, there were 45,224,881 shares outstanding. Upon completion of the mergers on July 8, 2015, the Company had 44,717,759 shares of common stock outstanding. The Company is authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001, and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001. The Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”), subject to shareholder approval, which was obtained on July 8, 2015. The 2015 Plan includes the authority to issue up to 2,500,000 shares of LEX’s common stock under the 2015 Plan. In connection with the mergers with Lindblad, certain stock options previously granted by Lindblad under the Lindblad Expeditions, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Lindblad Plan”) were assumed and converted into options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2015, options to purchase an aggregate of 2,849,071 shares of the Company’s common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $2.69 per share were outstanding. As of December 31, 2015, 14,008,382 warrants to purchase common stock at a price of $11.50 per share were outstanding.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less, as well as deposits in financial institutions, to be cash and cash equivalents.

 

Concentration of Credit Risk

 

The Company maintains cash in several financial institutions in the U.S. and other countries which, at times, may exceed the federally insured limits. Accounts held in the U.S. are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to certain limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the Company’s cash held in financial institutions outside of the U.S. amounted to $3.9$4.1 million and $2.5$2.7 million, respectively.

  

F-13

Restricted Cash and Marketable Securities

 

Included in “Restricted cash and marketable securities” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are restricted cash and marketable securities, consisting of six-month certificates of deposit and short-term investments. Restricted cash and marketable securities consist of the following:

 

 As of December 31,  As of December 31, 
(In thousands) 2015  2014  2017  2016 
Restricted cash and marketable securities:     
Federal Maritime Commission escrow $4,186  $2,571 
Credit negotiation and credit card processor reserves $5,030  $5,030   1,530   5,030 
Federal Maritime Commission escrow  2,233   2,115 
Certificates of deposit and other restricted securities  1,197   1,190   1,341   1,414 
Total restricted cash and marketable securities $8,460  $8,335  $7,057  $9,015 

 

The amounts held in restricted cash and marketable securities represent principally funds required to be held in certificates of deposit by certain vendors and regulatory agencies and are classified as restricted assets since such amounts cannot be used by the Company until the restrictions are removed by those vendors and regulatory agencies. Interest income is recognized when earned.

 

The Company has classified marketable securities, principally money market funds, as trading securities which are recorded at market value. Unrealized gains and losses are included in current operations. Gains and losses on the disposition of securities are recognized by the specific identification method in the period in which they occur.

 

In order to operate guest tour expedition vessels from U.S. ports, the Company is required to post a performance bond with the Federal Maritime Commission or escrow all unearned guest deposits plus an additional 10% in restricted accounts. To satisfy this requirement, the Company entered into an agreement with a financial institution to escrow all unearned guest revenues collected for sailings from U.S. ports.

 

A

F-10

At December 31, 2017 and 2016 a cash reserve of $1.5 million and $5.0 million, cash reserve at December 31, 2015 and 2014respectively, is required for credit card deposits by third-party credit card processors. The above arrangements are included in restricted cash and marketable securities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

 

Amounts in the escrow accounts include cash, certificates of deposit and marketable securities. Cost of these short-term investments approximates fair value.

 

Inventories and Marine Operating Supplies and Inventories

Inventories consist primarily of gift shop merchandise and other items for resale and are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.

 

Marine operating supplies consist primarily of fuel, provisions, spare parts, items required for maintenance and supplies used in the operation of marine expeditions. Marine operating supplies are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in first-out method.

 

InInventories consist primarily of gift shop merchandise and other items for resale and are stated at the third quarterlower of 2015,cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the Company adjusted cost of tours by $0.3 million due to a change in application of accounting procedures, and reclassified $0.4 million in items from inventories and marine operating supplies to property and equipment, net. The change in application of accounting procedures was a result of the Company’s review of its inventory process during the third quarter which found the counting of certain small supply items a disruption to operations, impractical and expensive and discontinued the count of these items in the third quarter and in the future.first-in, first-out method.

  

F-14

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

 

The Company records prepaid expenses and other current assets at cost and expenses them in the period the services are provided or the goods are delivered. The Company’s prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:

 

 As of December 31,  As of  December 31, 
(In thousands) 2015  2014  2017  2016 
Prepaid tour expenses $5,269  $5,181  $9,846  $11,593 
Prepaid air expense  3,621   2,432 
Prepaid client insurance  1,706   1,663   2,525   2,141 
Prepaid air expense  1,379   856 
Prepaid marketing, commissions and other expenses  2,495   1,823 
Prepaid corporate insurance  1,033   931 
Prepaid port agent fees  1,080   827   1,022   1,038 
Prepaid taxes  938   653 
Prepaid corporate insurance  673   523 
Other prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,221   1,618 
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets $12,266  $11,321 
Prepaid income taxes  809   824 
Total prepaid expenses $21,351  $20,782 

 

Property and Equipment, net

 

Property and equipment, arenet is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization wereis computed using the straight linestraight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows:

 

  Years
Vessels and vessel improvements 15-25
Furniture & equipment 5
Computer hardware and software 5
Leasehold improvements, including expedition sites and port facilities Shorter of lease term or related asset life

 

The ship-based tour and expedition industry is very capital intensive and asintensive. As of December 31 2015 and 2014,2017, the Company owned and operated sixseven vessels, including a new coastal vessel, theNational Geographic Quest,which joined the fleet in the third quarter of 2017. The Company has contracted for two additional vessels. Therefore,TheNational Geographic Venture,a coastal vessel, is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2018, and a polar ice class vessel is targeted to be completed in the first quarter of 2020, with potential accelerated delivery to November 2019. The polar ice class contract includes options to build two additional ice class vessels, the first for delivery twelve months after the initial vessel and the second for delivery twelve months thereafter. The Company has a capital program that it develops for the improvement of its vessels and for asset replacements in order to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of its operations; comply with, or exceed all relevant legal and statutory requirements related to health, environment, safety, security and sustainability; and gain strategic benefits or provide newer improved product innovations to its guests.

 

Vessel improvement costs that add value to the Company’s vessels, such as those discussed above, are capitalized to the vessels and depreciated over the shorter of the improvements or the vessel’s estimated remaining useful life, while costs of repairs and maintenance, including minor improvement costs and drydock expenses, are charged to expense as incurred and included in other vessels operating expenses.cost of tours. Drydock costs primarily represent planned major maintenance activities that are incurred when a vessel is taken out of service for scheduled maintenance.service. For U.S. flagged ships, the statutory requirement is an annual docking and U.S. Coast Guard inspections, normally conducted in drydock. Internationally flagged ships have scheduled dockings approximately every 12 months, for a period of up to three to six weeks.

Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, principally its vessels and operating rights, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the assessment of possible impairment is based on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of its asset, which is determined by using the asset’s estimated undiscounted future cash flows. If these estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment charge is recognized for the excess, if any, of the asset’s carrying value over its estimated fair value. A significant amount of judgment is required in estimating the future cash flows and fair values of its vessels and operating rights.

 

 F-15F-11 

 

Goodwill

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, there was no triggering event and the Company did not record an impairment of its long-lived assets.

The authoritative guidance requires that goodwill be assessed annually for impairment. The Company reviewedcompleted the remaining useful life of theNational Geographic Endeavour, which is expected to be replaced by theVia Australisin the fourth quarter of 2016. The evaluation of theNational Geographic Endeavour’s useful lifeannual impairment test as of December 31, 2015 indicated a shorter remaining useful lifeSeptember 30, 2017 with no indication of less than one year versusgoodwill impairment. Future impairment tests will be performed annually as of September 30, or sooner if warranted. See Notes 4 and 5 for further details on goodwill.

Intangibles, net

Intangibles, net include tradenames, customer lists and operating rights. Tradenames are words, symbols, or other devices used in trade or business to indicate the previous estimated remaining useful lifesource of seven years (see Note 5 – Propertyproducts and Equipment). The Company also does not expect any residual value forto distinguish it from other products and are registered with government agencies and are protected legally by continuous use in commerce. Customer lists are established relationships with existing customers that resulted in repeat purchases and customer loyalty. Based on theNational Geographic Endeavour after the end Company’s analysis, amortization of the fourth quartertradenames and customer lists were computed using the estimated useful lives of 2016. The Company also evaluated a new law in Ecuador15 and its effect on our Operating rights. As a result of the new law, the life of the cupos changed from indefinite lives to nine5 years, and amortization of operating rights began in August 2015 (see Note 4 – Operating Rights).

Operating Rightsrespectively.

 

The Company operates two vessels year-round in the Galápagos National Park in Ecuador; theNational Geographic Endeavour IIwith 95 berths and theNational Geographic Islander with 47 berths. In order to operate these vessels within the park, the Company is required to have in its possession cupos (licenses) sufficient to cover the total available berths on each vessel.

 

In June 2015, a new Ecuadorian Special Law for Protected Areas was approved and updated in November 2015. A Presidential Decree issued by President Correa of Ecuador in November 2015 established that cupos, which were in effect as ofsince July 2015, will have a validity of nine years. The Company’s operating rights are up for renewal in July 2024 and, based on the new law, the Company will begin the renewal process in 2020. The current “owners” of the cupos will have the opportunity to re-apply for them, but any other enterprise or individual will have the opportunity to bid for the cupos. All bidders must present proof that they fulfill the conditions to properly utilize the license (access to a vessel, experience in tourism, proven environmental behavior, marketing, etc.). While the Company believes that, based on the expected criteria to retain cupos and its past operating history in the Galápagos, there is a strong possibility that the Company will retain its cupos, from an accounting perspective, it will assume they retain no value after July 2024. Once the renewal process ishas begun and if it can be determined that the Company will be successful in its bid, then the Company will adjust its amortization prospectively. Operating rights are amortized over their remaining government mandated lives.

 

Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the assessment of possible impairment of the Company’s intangibles, net will be based on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of its asset, which is determined by using the asset’s estimated undiscounted future cash flows. If these estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment charge is recognized for the excess, if any, of the asset’s carrying value over its estimated fair value. A significant amount of judgment is required in estimating the future cash flows and fair values of its tradenames, customer lists and operating rights. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there was no triggering event and the Company did not record an impairment for intangible assets.

Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived assets, principally its vessels, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the assessment of possible impairment is based on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of its asset, which is determined by using the asset’s estimated undiscounted future cash flows. If these estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment charge is recognized for the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its estimated fair value. A significant amount of judgment is required in estimating the future cash flows and fair values of its vessels.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there was no triggering event and the Company did not record an impairment of its long-lived assets. In the first quarter of 2016, the Company reviewed the remaining useful life of theNational Geographic Endeavour, which was replaced by theNational Geographic Endeavour II in the fourth quarter of 2016. The evaluation of theNational Geographic Endeavour’s useful life as of December 31, 2015 indicated a shorter remaining useful life of less than one year versus the previous estimated remaining useful life of seven years. See Note 3 – Property and Equipment. As a result, the Company accelerated the depreciation in order to fully depreciate the asset by the end of the fourth quarter of 2016.

Investment in CFMF and Additional Paid-In Capital

 

The Company uses the equity method of accounting for business investments when it has active involvement, but not control, in the venture. In 2015, the Company changed its accounting treatment for the investment in CFMF to the cost method and derecognized any earnings previously reported in the current year and adjusted the treatment of the CFMF transaction.

 

F-12

On March 3, 2009, LindbladLEX issued a note payable to Cruise/Ferry Master Fund I, N.V. (see Note 8 – Long-Term Debt). On December 11, 2014, LindbladLEX entered into a Profit Participation Loan Purchase Agreement with DVB Bank America, N.V. (“DVB”), a Profit Participation Rights Purchase Agreement with Buss Kreuzfahrtfonds 1 GmbH & Co. KG and Buss Kreuzfahrtfonds 2 GmbH & Co. KG, and a Stock Purchase Agreement with Cruise/Ferry Finance Partners Private Foundation. These three agreements enabled LindbladLEX to purchase the financial and equity interests in CFMF in order to recapture and extinguish an outstanding warrant to purchase 60% of the outstanding equity of LindbladLEX on a fully diluted basis. On December 11, 2014, the date of the purchase agreements, an initial payment of $25.0 million was made to DVB under the Profit Participation Loan Purchase Agreement. The remaining payments of (i) $22.7 million to DVB, (ii) $48.4 million to Buss Kreuzfahrtfonds 1 GmbH & Co. KG and Buss Kreuzfahrtfonds 2 GmbH & Co. KG, as increased by $0.3 million per month from December 31, 2014 until the close of the transaction, and (iii) $1.00 to Cruise/Ferry Financing Partners Private Foundation were made on May 8, 2015 (“CFMF Closing”). In connection with the CFMF Closing, the 60% warrant was cancelled; the junior debt note receivable was cancelled; and the related junior debt facility offset by the outstanding unamortized balance of the debt discount was cancelled, resulting in a gain on the transfer of assets, and LindbladLEX commenced liquidation procedures on CFMF. Utilizing the proceeds from the new loans, LindbladLEX also paid in full its preexisting senior debt facility in the amount of $39.8 million held by DVB.

F-16

 

The investment in CFMF was liquidated subsequent to the purchase of CFMF on May 8, 2015. The CFMF assets acquired were the junior mortgage note receivable and warrant and both were cancelled and resulted in the removal of the junior mortgage note receivable, which had a relative fair value of $8.5 million, and related junior debt, which had a fair value of $16.0 million (a face value of $20.0 million less the debt discount of $4.0 million). This resulted in a $7.5 million gain on the transfer of assets and an $83.7 million adjustment to additional paid-in capital for the cancellation of the warrant.

 

Assignment and Assumption Agreement

 

In connection with Lindblad’sLEX’s agreement to purchase CFMF, Sven-Olof Lindblad (“Mr. LindbladLindblad”) earned a success fee of $5.0 million from DVB for the purchase of CFMF (DVB was a partner in CFMF and the lender of Lindblad’sLEX’s preexisting senior debt facility).

 

On March 9, 2015, Mr. Lindblad and LindbladLEX entered into an Assignment and Assumption Agreement pursuant to which Mr. Lindblad (i) assigned and transferred to LindbladLEX his right to receive a $5.0 million fee payable to Mr. Lindblad personally by DVB and (ii) exercised his outstanding option to purchase 809,984 shares (converted from 2,857 shares at the merger date) of Lindblad’sLEX’s stock for $0.1 million in aggregate exercise proceeds. In exchange for the assignment to LindbladLEX of the fee payable by DVB, all of Mr. Lindblad’s obligations under his loan agreement with LindbladLEX (the “Mr. Lindblad Loan Agreement”), which had a balance of principal and accrued interest of $2.8 million as of March 9, 2015, were deemed satisfied in full, the Mr. Lindblad Loan Agreement and related promissory note were terminated, and Mr. Lindblad’s obligation to pay the aggregate exercise price for the exercise of the option described above was satisfied in full. On May 8, 2015, LindbladLEX received the $5.0 million fee from DVB and compensated Mr. Lindblad $5.0 million (success fee compensation expense), which was paid by settling the $2.8 million outstanding amount of principal and interest owed and the aggregate exercise proceeds of $0.1 million payable in connection with the exercise of the option (above), and also offset by $2.1 million in required withholding taxes.

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

 

The Company records accounts payable and accrued expenses for the cost of such items when the service is provided or when the related product is delivered. The Company’s accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following:

 

 As of December 31,  As of  December 31, 
(In thousands) 2015  2014  2017  2016 
Accounts payable $8,843  $5,109  $7,791  $7,573 
Accrued liabilities  7,175   5,637 
Bonus compensation  3,465   3,150 
Income taxes  2,045   1,836 
Accrued other expense  7,001   5,999 
Bonus compensation liabilty  3,736   4,186 
New build liability  2,730   4,011 
Employee liability  2,644   3,494 
Refunds and commissions payable  1,805   1,454 
Royalty payable  1,310   999   1,673   1,468 
Other  3,130   3,297 
Income tax liabilities  1,490   884 
Travel certificate liability  1,120   1,218 
Accrued travel insurance expense  432   375 
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses $25,968  $20,028  $30,422  $30,662 

 

F-13

Leases

 

The Company leases office space with lease terms ranging from one to ten years. The Company amortizes the total lease costs on a straight linestraight-line basis over the minimum lease term.

 

The Company leases computer hardware and software and office equipment and vehicles with lease terms ranging from three to six years.

 

F-17

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure

 

The Company applies ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which expands disclosures for assets and liabilities that are measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received upon the sale of an asset or payment to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the inputs in measuring fair value as follows:

 

Level 1Quoted market prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at measurement date.
  
Level 2Quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. Fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies.
  
Level 3Significant unobservable inputs for assets or liabilities that cannot be corroborated by market data. Fair value is determined by the reporting entity’s own assumptions utilizing the best information available and includes situations where there is little market activity for the investment.

 

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses and unearned passenger revenue approximate fair value, due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

 

The carrying value of long-term debt approximates fair value given that the terms of the agreement were comparable to the market as of December 31, 2015.2017 and 2016. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had no other liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

 

The asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table provides a summary of the liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had no liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

(In thousands) Total  Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities
(Level 1)
  Quoted Prices for Similar Assets or Liabilities in Active Markets (Level 2)  

Significant Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 
Obligation for the repurchase of common shares subject to put as of December 31, 2014 $4,966  $-  $-  $4,966 
                 
Obligation cancelled in the merger – July 8, 2015  (4,966)  -   -   (4,966)
                 
Obligation for the repurchase of common shares subject to put as of December 31, 2015 $-  $-  $-  $- 

Lindblad and certain of its stockholders who acquired shares through the exercise of stock options, entered into agreements providing for the redemption of outstanding shares at any time by the holder. Accordingly, these shares were subject to repurchase under the terms of these agreements. As of December 31, 2014, there were 1,912,833 (converted from 6,747 shares as a result of the merger) shares outstanding subject to such redemption.

The obligation for the repurchase of common shares was cancelled as a result of the merger on July 8, 2015.

Level 3 liabilities are valued using unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value. For fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer determined its valuation policies and procedures. The development and determination of the unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements and fair value calculations are the responsibility of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer with support from the Company’s consultants and which are approved by the Chief Financial Officer.

F-18

 

Level 3 financial liabilities consist of obligations for which there is no current market for these securities such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. Changes in fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are analyzed each period based on changes in estimates or assumptions and recorded as appropriate.

 

The fair value of the Company’s common stock was determined by the Company and was derived from a valuation prepared by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer using a weighted analysis of peer multiples of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and discounted cash flows.

Income Taxes

DeferredThe U. S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) introduces significant changes to U.S. income tax assetslaw that have a meaningful impact on our provision for income taxes.  Due to the timing of the enactment and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences betweencomplexity involved in applying the provisions of the Tax Act, we made reasonable estimates of the effects and recorded provisional amounts in our financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effectstatements for the year ended December 31, 2017. Accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Act requires significant judgments and estimates in the interpretation and calculations of the provisions of the Tax Act. The U.S. Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and other standard-setting bodies may issue guidance on how the provisions of the Tax Act will be applied or otherwise administered that is different from our interpretation.  As we collect and prepare necessary data, and interpret the Tax Act and any additional guidance issued by the IRS or other standard-setting bodies, we may make adjustments to the provisional amounts that could materially affect our financial statements in the period in which those temporary differencesthe adjustments are expectedmade.

The Company is subject to be recovered or settled. The measurement of net deferredincome taxes in both the U.S. and the non-U.S. jurisdictions in which it operates. Significant management judgment is required in projecting ordinary income to determine the Company’s estimated effective tax assets is reduced by the amount of any tax benefit that, based on available evidence, is not expected to be realized, and a corresponding valuation allowance is established. The determination of the required valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets was made without taking into account the deferred tax liabilities created from the book and tax differences on indefinite-lived assets.rate.

 

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which it recognizes deferred income taxes for the tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities, as well as for tax loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. The Company measures deferred tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recoverable or settled. The Company recognizes the effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company provides a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets if, based upon the weight of available evidence, the Company does not believe it is “more-likely-than-not” that some or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The Company will continue to evaluate the deferred tax asset valuation allowance balances in all of our foreign and U.S. companies to determine the appropriate level of valuation allowances.

 

F-14

The Company is subject to income taxes in both the U.S. and the non-U.S. jurisdictions in which it operates. The Company regularly assesses the potential outcome of current and future examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the provision for income taxes. The Company has only recorded financial statement benefits for tax positions which it believes reflect the “more-likely-than-not” criteria of FASB’s authoritative guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, and it has established income tax reserves in accordance with this guidance where necessary. Once a financial statement benefit for a tax position is recorded or a tax reserve is established, the Company adjusts it only when there is more information available or when an event occurs necessitating a change. While the Company believes that the amount of the recorded financial statement benefits and tax reserves reflect the more-likely-than-not criteria, it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may result in a reduction to the tax benefits previously recorded on its consolidated financial statements or may exceed the current income tax reserves in amounts that could be material. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the Company had a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively, which was included in other long-term liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The guidance also discusses the classification of related interest and penalties on income taxes. The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions included in income tax expense was $60.6 thousand and $41.8 thousand, respectively, representing interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions.insignificant.

 

The Company is subject to tax audits in all jurisdictions for which it files tax returns. Tax audits by their very nature are often complex and can require several years to complete. Currently, there is aare no U.S. federal, tax audit pending for 2013, and no state or foreign jurisdiction tax audits pending. The Company’s corporate U.S. federal and state tax returns from 2012 to 2014for the current year and three prior years remain subject to examination by tax authorities and the Company’s foreign tax returns from 2011 to 2014for the current year and four prior years remain subject to examination by tax authorities.

 

F-19

Other Long-Term Assets

 

As of December 31, 2014, other long-term assets included a balance of $2.0 million in deferred financing costs, related primarily to legal and bank financing fees incurred to negotiate and secure long-term financing, and were amortized over the term of the financing using the effective interest method. In 2015,2016, the Company recorded deferred financing costsa $3.6 million tax asset for long-term prepaid value-added taxes related to the importation of $11.0 million for the New Credit Facility in long-term debt, amortizingNational Geographic Endeavour IIand expect to earn tax credits that will reduce the costsasset over the term of the financing using the straight-line and effective interest method (see Note 8 – Long-Term Debt).next several years.

 

In connection with the merger on July 8, 2015, the Company, Mr. Lindblad and National Geographic Society entered into a Call Option agreement where Mr. Lindblad agreed to grant National Geographic Society an option to purchase 2,387,499 of Mr. Lindblad’s shares in the Company as consideration for the assumption of the alliance and license agreements and the tour operator agreement.NG Agreements. The Company recorded a $13.8 million long-term asset using a fair value of $5.76 per option share. The balance of the license agreement asset as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $6.5 and $9.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2015,2017 and December 31, 2016, the balance in other long-term assets was $12.4$10.0 million (seeand $13.1 million, respectively. See Note 109 – Commitments and Contingencies for more details).details.

 

Deferred Financing Costs

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded deferred financing costs of $0.4 million, $1.6 million and $11.0 million, respectively, in long-term debt, amortizing the costs over the term of the financing using the straight-line and effective interest method. See Note 7 – Long-Term Debt.

Foreign Currency Translation

 

The Company’sU.S. dollar is the functional currency isin the U.S. dollar. RemeasurementCompany’s foreign operations and remeasurement adjustments and gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are recorded as foreign exchange gains or losses in the consolidated statements of income.operations.

 

The Company became subject to foreign currency translation in connection with its 2013 acquisition of Fillmore Pearl Holding, Ltd. (“FPH”), which operates partially in Australia and whose functional currency is the U.S. dollar. For the FPH operations included in these consolidated financial statements for periods prior to April 17, 2013, the functional currency was the Australian dollar.

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to employees, non-employee directors or other service providers in accordance with accounting guidance that requires that awards are recorded at their fair value on the date of grant and are amortized over the vestingservice period of the award. The Company recognizes compensation costs on a straight linestraight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting term of the equity instrument issued. To the extent that an equity award later becomes eligible to be put back to the Company, then the fair value of that award or those exercised shares is transferred out of additional paid-in-capital to a liability account and is thereafter marked-to-market annually to fair value.

  

Management’s Evaluation of Subsequent EventsSegment Reporting

 

Management evaluated events that have occurred after the balance sheet date through the date the financial statementsWe are issued. Based upon the evaluation, management did identify a subsequent event that requires disclosure in the consolidated financial statements (see Note 14 – Subsequent Events).

Business Segments

The Company isprimarily a specialty cruise operator with operations in one segmenttwo segments, Lindblad and evaluatesNatural Habitat. We evaluate the performance of itsour business based largely on the results of its singleour operating segment. The Company provides discrete financial information in total, by ship and type of ship.segments. The chief operating decision maker, or CODM, and management review operating results monthly, and base operating decisions on the total results. The Company’sresults at a consolidated level, as well as at a segment level. Our reports provided to the Board of Directors are at a consolidated level.level and also contain information regarding the separate results of both segments. Management performance and related compensation is primarily based on total results. Based on this assessment,While both segments have similar characteristics, the Company concluded that it has one singletwo operating segment and therefore one reportable segment.reporting segments cannot be aggregated because they fail to meet the requirements for aggregation.

 

F-15

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, FASBAugust 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-12,Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. This guidance will make more financial and nonfinancial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting. It also amends the presentation and disclosure requirements and changes how companies assess effectiveness. It is intended to more closely align hedge accounting with companies’ risk management strategies, simplify the application of hedge accounting, and increase transparency as to the scope and results of hedging programs. Update No. 2017-12 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. Management is currently assessing the impact this guidance will have on the financial position or results of operations. 

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. The purpose of Update No. 2017-09 is to provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. Update No. 2017-09 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04,Intangibles and Other (Topic 350):Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The amendment was issued in response from stakeholders’ regarding the cost and complexity of the goodwill impairment test. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the Board eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. In computing the implied fair value of goodwill under Step 2, an entity had to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities). Now the entity compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. Update No. 2017-04 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01,Business Combinations (Topic 805):Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The guidance was issued to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments in this Update provide a screen to determine when a set (inputs and processes that produce an output) is a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. ASU No. 2017-01 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted The Company does not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases”Leases (Topic 842). The main difference between previous GAAP and Topic 842 isguidance requires the recognition of lease right of use assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases previously classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. The FASB is issuing this Updateoperating. This guidance was issued to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. To meet that objective, the FASBASU 2016-02 is amending the FASB ASC and creating Topic 842, Leases. For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for financial statements issued for annual periodsyears beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods.2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will evaluateis currently evaluating the effects thateffect adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments- Overall” (Topic 825-10). The amendments in this ASU address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. They supersede the guidance to classify equity securities with readily determinable fair values into different categories (that is, trading or available-for-sale) and require equity securities (including other ownership interests, such as partnerships, unincorporated joint ventures, and limited liability companies) to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through net income. An entity’s equity investments that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting or result in consolidation of an investee are not included within the scope of this Update. The amendments allow equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values to be remeasured at fair value either upon the occurrence of an observable price change or upon identification of an impairment. The amendments also require enhanced disclosures about those investments. The amendments improve financial reporting by providing relevant information about an entity’s equity investments and reducing the number of items that are recognized in other comprehensive income. For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company will evaluate the effects, if any, that adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.

F-20

In November 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes - Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (Topic 740). The amendments in this ASU require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position and apply to all entities that present a classified statement of financial position. The current requirement that deferred tax liabilities and assets of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not affected by the amendments in this ASU. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted this ASU in the fourth quarter of 2015 and its adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, “Interest-Imputation of Interest” (Subtopic 835-30). This ASU adds Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) paragraphs pursuant to the SEC Staff Announcement at the June 18, 2015 Emerging Issues Task Force meeting about the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements. Given the absence of authoritative guidance within ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest—Imputation of Interest” (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, related to line-of-credit arrangements, the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The Company adopted this ASU in the third quarter of 2015 and its adoption did not have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers – Deferral of the Effective Date” (Topic 606). The amendments in this ASU defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” for all entities by one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in Update 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company will evaluate the effects, if any, that adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.

  

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “RevenueRevenue from Contracts with Customers”Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition,” and most industry-specific guidance.. This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depictupon the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. TheThere have been multiple clarifying ASU’s issued subsequent to ASU also requires additional disclosure about2014-09. We will adopt the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty ofguidance related to revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The amendmentsrecognition beginning in the ASU mustfirst quarter of 2018, using the modified retrospective transition method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of the adoption date. Upon adoption, we will recognize the cumulative effect of adopting this guidance as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. Prior periods will not be applied using one of two retrospective methods and are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted.restated. The Company will evaluatedoes not believe the effects, if any, that adoption of this ASUguidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards upon adoption would have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share- Based Payment Accounting” (Topic 718). This ASU significantly reduces the accompanying consolidated financial statements.complexity and cost of accounting for excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies related to stock-based compensation. The Company adopted this guidance as required during the quarter ending March 31, 2017. As a result of the new guidance, the Company recorded a de minimis benefit related to the exercise of stock options during the quarter ended March 31, 2017. The Company recognized an increase in deferred tax assets and retained earnings in the amount of $1.8 million in accordance with the retrospective method of applying this guidance.

 

 F-21F-16 

 

NOTE 3 – ACQUISITION OF FPH

On April 12, 2013, the Company acquired all of the capital stock of FPH. FPH, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Fillmore Pearl II, Ltd. (“FP II”), a Cayman Islands company, owns the vesselNational Geographic Orion. FP II charters the vesselNational Geographic Orion to Fillmore Pearl Investment Pty, Ltd, an Australian company that conducts tours in destinations around the world. The acquisition was made pursuant to a stock purchase agreement, dated as of April 17, 2013 (the “FPH Agreement”), by and between the Company and FPH’s shareholders. The purchase price under the FPH Agreement was approximately $30.0 million with $5.0 million paid in cash and financing of the remaining $25.0 million through an increase in its senior secured credit facility with DVB. The $25.0 million (as part of the Senior Debt) bears an interest rate of 5.02%, has a term of 80 months and is secured by principally all the assets of the Company. On May 8, 2015, using the proceeds from the Credit Agreement, the senior secured credit facility was paid in full.

The assets and liabilities of FPH have been recorded in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at the seller’s historical carrying value.

Current assets acquired included cash, accounts receivable, inventory, other current assets and prepaids. Non-current assets included the vessel and other lesser property and equipment. Liabilities assumed included accrued liabilities and most significantly, unearned guest revenue related to future voyages.

The following details the carryover basis of the purchase price, as adjusted, for the acquisition of FPH (in thousands):

Cash $3,699 
Inventory  771 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,018 
Property and equipment  53,302 
Accrued liabilities  (3,458)
Unearned revenue  (12,332)
Equity investment by common control parent  (13,823)
Total $30,177 
Less: net earnings of FPH while under common control  (177)
Total net assets acquired $30,000 

The following presents a summary of the purchase price consideration for the purchase of FPH (in thousands):

Cash $5,000 
Long-term debt  25,000 
Total Purchase Price Consideration $30,000 

The results of operations for FPH are reflected in the Company’s results in the accompanying consolidated statements of income from November 30, 2012, the date that CFMF acquired control of FPH. The acquisition of FPH represents a change in reporting entity and a transaction between entities under common control. The excess net book value of FPH’s assets and liabilities over the purchase price was accounted for as a deemed contribution by CFMF, as the common control parent, to the Company.

NOTE 4 – OPERATING RIGHTS

The total carrying value of the cupos that the Company is required to have in its possession is included as “Operating rights” on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and was $6.2 million and $6.5 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Amortization of operating rights was $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, which began in August 2015. The Company did not record amortization for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Future amortization of operating rights are as follows:

For the Years Ended December 31, Operating Rights Amortization 
  (In thousands) 
2016 $725 
2017  725 
2018  725 
2019  725 
2020  725 
Thereafter  2,602 
 $6,227 

F-22

NOTE 5 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

 

Property and equipment, net are as follows:

 

 As of December 31,  As of  December 31, 
(In thousands) 2015  2014  2017  2016 
Vessels and improvements $214,170  $200,037  $346,895  $267,415 
Furniture and equipment  8,169   7,803   11,731   10,726 
Leasehold improvements  1,439   1,438   1,425   1,425 
Total property and equipment, gross  223,778   209,278   360,051   279,566 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (98,307)  (87,405)  (109,099)  (93,330)
Property and equipment, net $125,471  $121,873  $250,952  $186,236 

 

Total depreciation and amortization expense of the Company’s property and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 2014 and 2013 were $11.3$15.8 million, $10.9$17.1 million and $11.2$11.3 million, respectively.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had $80.5 million in capital expenditures, including capitalized interest, added to property and equipment, net. This amount primarily included $42.8 million for the two newbuild coastal vessels and $27.2 million toward the purchase of its new polar ice class vessel. The Company has signed a definitive agreementbegan to acquire a new vessel, theVia Australis, and place itcapitalize interest in service in the fourth quarter of 2016. This vessel will replaceJanuary 2016 for its two newbuild coastal vessels, its renovation improvements to theNational Geographic Endeavour II which, and the polar ice class vessel. The capitalized interest has been and will continue to be added to the historical cost of the assets and depreciated over their useful lives beginning upon completion. For the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company expectsrecognized $2.6 and $1.5 million, respectively, in capitalized interest in property and equipment, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

As part of the transition fromNational Geographic Endeavour to operate through the fourth quarter of 2016 and does not expect it to operate or have any salvage value beyond the fourth quarter of 2016. The Company evaluated the carrying value forNational Geographic Endeavour II, we removed theNational Geographic Endeavourfrom operationsin December 2016 and its fixturesincurred a loss on disposal of asset of approximately $0.8 million. Loss on disposal includes costs associated with inventory items and determined that an impairment should not be recognized. The evaluationaccrued expenses for anticipated costs to dispose of theNational Geographic Endeavour’sEndeavour useful life, including but not limited to port costs, fuel and crew expenses.

NOTE 4 – ACQUISITION

On May 4, 2016, the Company acquired an 80.1% ownership interest in Natural Habitat, an adventure travel and ecotourism company based in Colorado. The acquisition provides the Company with a platform to expand our land-based expeditions with a strong, trusted brand complimentary to Lindblad. In 2016, the Company incurred $1.0 million of acquisition costs related to the acquisition of Natural Habitat, which is included in general and administrative expenses of the Company’s consolidated statement of income.

The Company recorded this transaction using the acquisition method for business combinations. The Company measured the identifiable assets, liabilities and non-controlling interest of Natural Habitat at their fair market value as of the acquisition date and separately measured goodwill at its fair market value as of the acquisition date. Goodwill is an intangible asset arising as a result of name, reputation, customer loyalty, location, products and similar factors not separately identified. The recorded goodwill has no tax basis and is therefore not tax deductible.

The Company recognized a noncontrolling interest in Natural Habitat and measured the noncontrolling interest at fair value on the acquisition date. The noncontrolling interest is recognized as a redeemable noncontrolling interest to the extent that the risks and rewards of ownership substantially remain with the noncontrolling interest. 

Mr. Bressler’s noncontrolling interest in the remaining 19.9% interest in Natural Habitat is subject to a put/call arrangement. The arrangement between the Company and Mr. Bressler was established in order to provide a formal exit opportunity for Mr. Bressler and a path to 100% ownership for the Company. Mr. Bressler has a put option under certain conditions and subject to providing notice by October 31, 2020, that enables him, but does not obligate him, to sell his remaining interest in Natural Habitat on December 31, 2020. The Company has a call option, but not an obligation, with an expiration of December 31, 20152025, under which it can buy Mr. Bressler’s remaining interest at a similar fair value measure as Mr. Bressler’s put option. 

These rights to purchase or sell the noncontrolling interest may be at a fixed or variable price, or at fair value, and may be exercisable on a fixed date or any time at some point in the future. The existence of these rights impacts (1) whether separate assets or liabilities should be recognized for these rights, (2) the classification of any minority ownership as a liability, equity or redeemable noncontrolling interest, and (3) the amount of earnings recognized in the financial statements. 

F-17

As the purchase prices indicated similar fair value measures, the put/call arrangement had been struck at fair value and each party is in agreement that the valuation is indicative of fair value, the asset and liability position would be netted and it is expected that the resulting value would be immaterial given the structure of the arrangement. As Mr. Bressler is responsible for the management of Natural Habitat, the risks and rewards of ownership substantially remain with the noncontrolling interest. The existence of the put/call arrangement does not indicate a shorter remaining useful lifeseparate obligation or liability for either party. Based on the existence of less than one year versusredemptive rights by Mr. Bressler, and the previous estimated remaining useful lifeexistence of seven years. Asrisks and rewards of ownership, the noncontrolling interest was recorded separately as a redeemable noncontrolling interest. The put right is not redeemable unless notice is provided as per the requirements of the agreement.

The total purchase price of the acquisition is as follows:

(In thousands)   
Cash consideration $14,850 
Long-term debt  2,525 
Lindblad restricted shares (264,208 shares)  2,650 
Total purchase price $20,025 

Below is a summary, which details the allocation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of this acquisition: 

(In thousands)   
Assets acquired:   
Cash and cash equivalents $4,904 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  9,623 
Property and equipment  2,068 
Goodwill and other intangibles  28,305 
Total assets $44,900 
     
Liabilities assumed:    
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $2,472 
Unearned passenger revenues  15,000 
Deferred tax liability  2,428 
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries  4,975 
Total liabilities $24,875 
     
Total cash price paid upon acquisition and fair value of existing equity interest $20,025 

The acquired business contributed revenues of $34.5 million and operating income of $2.2 million to Lindblad Expeditions for the period from May 5, 2016 to December 31, 2016. The following unaudited pro forma summary presents consolidated information of Lindblad Expeditions as if the business combination had occurred on January 1, 2015. 

  Pro forma years ended 
  December 31, 
(In thousands) 2016  2015 
Revenues $254,567  $249,819 
Operating income $15,345  $17,883 

The Company adjusted $1.0 million for nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma earnings as a result of acquisition costs incurred by Lindblad Expeditions. These pro forma amounts have been calculated after applying the Company’s accounting policies and adjusting the results of Natural Habitat to reflect the additional depreciation and amortization that would have been charged assuming the fair value adjustments to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets had been applied from January 1, 2015, with tax effects.

F-18

NOTE 5 – INTANGIBLES, NET

The carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of the Company’s intangibles, net are as follows:

  As of December 31, 
  2017     2016 
(In thousands) Gross Carrying Amount  Accumulated Amortization  Net Carrying Amount  Weighted Average Useful Life (years)  Gross Carrying Amount  Accumulated Amortization  Net Carrying Amount 
Tradenames $2,900  $(322) $2,578   13.3  $2,900  $(129) $2,771 
Customer lists  3,300   (1,100) $2,200   3.3   3,300   (440) $2,860 
Operating rights  6,529   (1,753) $4,776   6.6   6,529   (1,028) $5,501 
Total intangibles, net $12,729  $(3,175) $9,554   7.7  $12,729  $(1,597) $11,132 

The decrease in the Company’s intangibles, net is the result of amortization expense associated with intangible assets acquired in connection with the acquisition of Natural Habitat on May 4, 2016. As part of the acquisition, the Company estimates an acceleratedacquired Natural Habitat’s tradenames, customer lists and goodwill in the amounts of $2.9 million, $3.3 million and $22.1 million, respectively. The Company did not record a goodwill impairment charge for the year ended December 31, 2017. See Note 4 – Acquisitions, for additional information regarding this acquisition. The Company began amortizing operating rights with a gross carrying value of $6.5 million in July 2015 as a result of changes to cupos in the Galapagos National Park. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Policies,Intangibles, net for a description of, and rationale for, amortizing operating rights.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, amortization expense for intangibles, net was $1.6 million, $1.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The Company expects amortization expense related to these intangibles, net to be $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2019 and 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2022, we expect amortization expense to be $1.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, with the balance of $2.8 million amortized thereafter. Amortization expense for tradenames, customer lists and operating rights were recorded in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of an additional $0.5 million per month through October 2016.operations.

 

NOTE 6 – LETTERS OF CREDIT

 

As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the Company had $1.15 million and $4.65 million, respectively, in letters of credit outstanding with financial institutions in the amounts of $150,000, $1.0 million, and $3.5 million.institutions. The annual fee for letters of credit is 1% of the outstanding balance. The letters of credit are secured by a certificate of deposit maintained at the financial institutions. The $150,000 letter of credit matured on September 8, 2015institutions and was renewed with an extended maturity date of March 8, 2016. The $1.0 million letter of credit matured on June 30, 2015 and was renewed with an extended maturity date of June 30, 2016. The $3.5 million letter of credit matures on January 1, 2017.that mature in July 2018.

 

NOTE 7 – PARTICIPATION CERTIFICATESLONG-TERM DEBT

 

DuringNote Payable

On May 4, 2016, in connection with the year 2002, the Company completed a private placement andNatural Habitat acquisition, Natural Habitat issued $3.7an unsecured promissory note to Mr. Bressler with an outstanding principal amount of $2.5 million in “Participation Certificates” under Regulation D promulgated under securities laws.due at maturity on December 31, 2020. The Participation Certificates bearpromissory note accrues interest at a rate of 6% per annum and had an original maturity date of December 31, 2006, which was subsequently extended. In December of 2013, the Company redeemed $3.6 million representing the full amount of the outstanding balance of its Participation Certificates. Each Participation Certificate entitled its holder to receive “Travel Scrips”. Travel Scrips are credits toward the purchase of any tour, or trip offered to the public by the Company or any controlled affiliate of the Company, on the same terms and conditions (including availability) as offered to the public, at the most favorable price offered to the public at the time the holder makes the purchase. Travel Scrips unused in any year are cumulative without limitation as to time and may be freely transferred by holders. Travel Scrip obligations were $1.3 million and $1.4 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and are reflected within accounts1.44% annually, with interest payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet.every six months.

NOTE 8 – LONG-TERM DEBT

New Credit Facility

 

On May 8, 2015, Lindblad entered into a Credit Agreement with Credit Suisse as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent for a $150.0 million facility in the form of a $130.0 million U.S. Term Loan and a $20.0 million Cayman Loan for the benefit of Lindblad’s foreign subsidiaries. The gross proceeds from the Loans, net of discounts, fees and expenses, were $139.5 million. The loans incurred interest at a rate based on an adjusted ICE Benchmark administration LIBO Rate (subject to a floor of 1.00%) plus a spread of 5.50%. The net proceeds from the term loan advances were used to repay Lindblad’s existing debt, fund a portion of the purchase consideration paid in connection with Lindblad’s purchase of the financial and equity interests owned by CFMF and for general corporate purposes.

F-23

On July 8, 2015, the Company entered into an amended and restateda credit agreement with Credit Suisse, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent increasing by $25.0(“Credit Agreement”) for a $150.0 million facility, which was subsequently increased to $175.0 million upon syndication on July 8, 2015 (“Amended Credit Agreement”), in the form of a $155.0 million U.S. term loan (the “U.S. Term Loan”) and a $20.0 million Cayman term loan for the benefit of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries (the “Cayman Loan,” and together with the U.S. Term Loan, tothe “Loans”). On March 7, 2016, the Company entered into a $155.0 millionRestated Credit Agreement with Credit Suisse, amending its existing senior secured credit facility (total facility ofwith Credit Suisse (“Restated Credit Facility”). The Restated Credit Facility provides for the Company’s existing $175.0 million excluded $11.0senior secured first lien term loan facility and a new $45.0 million in deferred financing costs)senior secured incremental revolving credit facility (“AmendedRevolving Credit Agreement”Facility”)., which includes a $5.0 million letter of credit subfacility. The gross proceeds netCompany’s obligations under the Restated Credit Facility are secured by substantially all the assets of discounts, fees and expenses from the larger Amended Credit Agreement were $24.7 million, which will be used for general corporate purposes. TheCompany.

F-19

Borrowings under the Loans bear interest at a rate based on an adjusted ICE Benchmark administrationAdministration LIBO Rate (subject to a floor of 1.00%) plus a spread of 4.50%. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the interest rate was 5.50%6.34%. The Loans mature on May 8, 2021. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at an adjusted ICE Benchmark Administration LIBO Rate plus a spread of 4.00%, or, at the option of the Company, an alternative base rate plus a spread of 3.00%. The Company is also required to pay a 0.50% annual commitment fee on undrawn amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility, which matures on May 8, 2020.

The Restated Credit Agreement (i) requires the Company to satisfy certain financial covenants as set forth in the Amended Credit Agreement; (ii) limits the amount of indebtedness the Company may incur; (iii) limits the amount the Company may spend in connection with certain types of investments; and (iv) requires the delivery of certain periodic financial statements and an operating budget and (v) requires the mortgaged vessels and related inventory to be maintained in good working condition.. The U.S. Term Loan and the Cayman Loan both mature on May 8, 2021.condition. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants.

 

On March 7, 2016, the Company entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement with Credit Suisse as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, amending its existing senior secured credit facility with Credit Suisse (“Restated Credit Facility”). The Restated Credit Facility provides for the Company’s existing $175.0 million senior secured first lien term loan facility and a new $45.0 million senior secured incremental revolving credit facility, which includes a $5.0 million letter of credit subfacility. The Company’s obligations under the Restated Credit Facility are secured by substantially all the assets of the Company.

Borrowings under the term loan facility will continue to bear interest at an adjusted ICE Benchmark administration LIBO Rate (subject to a floor of 1.00%) plus a spread of 4.50%. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility will bear interest at an adjusted ICE Benchmark administration LIBO Rate plus a spread of 4.00%, or, at the option of the Company, an alternative base rate plus a spread of 3.00%. The Company is also required to pay a 0.50% annual commitment fee on undrawn amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility.

The Restated Credit Agreement contains the same financial and operational covenants as the Amended Credit Agreement.

The Revolving Credit Facility will mature on May 8, 2020, whereas the term loan facility matures on May 8, 2021. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility will be used for general corporate and working capital purposes and related fees and expenses. As of March 7, 2016,December 31, 2017, the Company had no borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility.

Senior Credit Facility

On October 16, 2007, Lindblad entered into a senior secured term loan (the “Original Senior Credit Facility”) with DVB for up to the maximum of the lesser of $35.0 million or an amount equal to 60% of the fair market value of Lindblad’s vessels. On July 19, 2012 and April 12, 2013, Lindblad amended and restated the Original Senior Credit Facility (“Senior Credit Facility”).

On May 8, 2015, using the proceeds from the loans (as discussed above), Lindblad paid off the Senior Credit Facility in full. The outstanding principal and accrued interest balance on the Senior Credit Facility was $39.8 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

Junior Credit Facility

On October 16, 2007, Lindblad entered into a junior secured term loan (the “Original Junior Credit Facility”) with DVB for up to the maximum of the lesser of $11.0 million or an amount equal to 76% of the fair market value of Lindblad’s vessels. On March 9, 2009, Lindblad entered into an amendment to its Original Junior Credit Facility (the “Amended Junior Credit Facility”). The amendment (a) named DVB as agent for new lenders – Cruise Ferry Master Fund I N.V., (b) increased the facility to a term loan of $15.0 million and a revolving loan of $10.0 million, and (c) extended the maturity of the junior facility to January 18, 2014. In consideration for this amendment and certain other accommodations under the terms of the Original Junior Credit Facility, Lindblad issued a warrant for the purchase of 60% of the fully diluted shares of Lindblad to CFMF. On January 19, 2010 and on July 19, 2012, Lindblad amended its Amended Junior Credit Facility.

On May 8, 2015, using the proceeds from the loans (as discussed above), Lindblad paid off the Amended Junior Credit Facility in full. The outstanding principal balance and accrued interest on the Junior Credit Facility was $20.0 million and $1.2 million.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013, total debt discount and2015, deferred financing costs charged to amortization and interest expense was $3.6were $2.2 million, $0.7$2.2 million and $2.1$3.6 million, respectively.

 
Senior Secured Credit Agreement

F-24

 

On January 8, 2018, the Company and its indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Borrower”) entered into a senior secured credit agreement (the “Export Credit Agreement”) with Citibank, N.A., London Branch (“Citi”) and Eksportkreditt Norge AS (together with Citi, the “Lenders”). Pursuant to the Export Credit Agreement, the Lenders have agreed to make available to the Borrower, at the Borrower’s option and subject to certain conditions, a loan in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $107.7 million for the purpose of providing financing for up to 80% of the purchase price of the Company’s new expedition ice-class cruise vessel targeted to be completed in January 2020. Seventy percent of the loan will be guaranteed by Garantiinstituttet for Eksportkreditt, the official export credit agency of Norway. If drawn upon, the loan will be made at the time of delivery of the vessel.

At the Borrower’s election, the loan will bear interest either at a fixed interest rate effectively equal to 5.78% or a floating interest rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus a margin of 3.00% per annum. The loan will amortize quarterly based on a twelve-year profile, with 70% maturing over twelve years from drawdown, and 30% maturing over five years from drawdown. The loan will be secured by a first priority mortgage over the new vessel and the assignment of related insurances. The Export Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default and mandatory prepayment events for, among other things, non-payment, breach of covenants, default on certain other indebtedness, certain large judgments and a change of control of the Company or the Borrower. In addition to paying interest on any outstanding loans under the facility, the Borrower is required to pay customary coordination, arrangement, agency, collateral and commitment fees. Amounts drawn under the Export Credit Agreement may be voluntarily prepaid at any time subject to customary breakage costs. All obligations of the Borrower under the Export Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the Company.

Long-Term Debt Outstanding

 

As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the following long-term debt instruments were outstanding:existed:

 

 As of December 31,  As of December 31, 
 2015  2014  2017  2016 
(In thousands) Principal  

Discount

and Deferred Financing Costs, net

  Balance, net of discount  Principal  Discount  

Balance, net

of discount

  Principal  Deferred Financing Costs, net  Balance  Principal  Deferred Financing Costs, net  Balance 
Note payable $2,525  $-  $2,525  $2,525  $-  $2,525 
Credit Facility $174,125  $9,682  $164,443  $-  $-  $-   170,625   (7,214)  163,411   172,375   (9,022)  163,353 
Senior Credit Facility  -   -   -   41,003   -   41,003 
Junior Credit Facility  -   -   -   20,000   4,313   15,687 
Total long-term debt  174,125   9,682   164,443   61,003   4,313   56,690   173,150   (7,214)  165,936   174,900   (9,022)  165,878 
Less current portion  1,750   -   1,750   4,934   -   4,934   (1,750)  -   (1,750)  (1,750)  -   (1,750)
Total long-term debt, non-current $172,375  $9,682  $162,693  $56,069  $4,313  $51,756  $171,400  $(7,214) $164,186  $173,150  $(9,022) $164,128 

 

Future minimum principal payments of long-term debt are as follows:

 

Year Amount  Amount 
 (In thousands) 
2016 $1,750 
2017  1,750 
(In thousands)   
2018  1,750   1,750 
2019  1,750   1,750 
2020  1,750   4,275 
2021  165,375   165,375 
 $174,125  $173,150 

 

F-20

NOTE 98 — INCOME TAXES

 

The Company (a “C” Corporation) provides for income taxes based on the Federal and state statutory rates on taxable income. U.S. and foreign components of income before incomes taxes are presented below:

The components of our income (loss) before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 2014 and 2013 are comprised of the following:presented below:

 

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2015  2014  2013 
Domestic $(3,700) $1,930  $2,647 
Foreign  20,793   23,115   13,860 
Total $17,093  $25,045  $16,507 

F-25
  For the years ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2017  2016  2015 
Domestic $(10,423) $(8,696) $(3,700)
Foreign  12,896   10,555   20,793 
Total $2,473  $1,859  $17,093 

 

The income tax provisions at December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 are comprised of the following:

 

 For the Years Ended December 31,  For the years ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2015  2014  2013  2017  2016  2015 
Current              
Federal $(38) $613  $1,256  $(15) $-  $(38)
State  (3)  109   212   529   51   (3)
Foreign - Other  805   1,789   288   1,062   164   805 
Total current 764  2,511  1,756   1,576   215   764 
Deferred                        
Federal $(3,140) $283  $(61)  8,168   (3,015)  (3,140)
State  (247)  32   (6)  242   (426)  (247)
Foreign - Other  (26)  (26)  (26)  16   26   (26)
Total deferred (3,413) 289  (93)  8,426   (3,415)  (3,413)
Income tax (benefit) expense $(2,649) $2,800  $1,663 
Income tax expense (benefit) $10,002  $(3,200) $(2,649)

 

The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted on December 22, 2017 and introduces significant changes to U.S. income tax law. Effective in 2018, the Tax Act reduces the U.S. statutory tax rate from 35% to 21%, transitions the U.S international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system, and creates new taxes on certain foreign-sourced earnings and certain related-party payments, which are referred to as the global intangible low-taxed income tax and the base erosion tax, respectively. In addition, in 2017 we were subject to a one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign subsidiary earnings not previously subject to U.S. income tax.

On December 22, 2017, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118") was issued to address the application of US GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act. Due to the timing of the enactment and the complexity involved in applying the provisions of the Tax Act, we have made reasonable estimates of the effects and recorded provisional amounts in our financial statements as of December 31, 2017. As we collect and prepare necessary data, and interpret the Tax Act and any additional guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, the IRS, and other standard-setting bodies, we may make adjustments to the provisional amounts. Those adjustments may materially impact our provision for income taxes and effective tax rate in the period in which the adjustments are made. The accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act will be completed in 2018.

Provisional amounts for the following income tax effects of the Tax Act have been recorded as of December 31, 2017 and are subject to change during 2018.

One-time transition tax

The Tax Act requires us to increase our U.S. taxable income for accumulated foreign subsidiary earnings not previously subject to U.S. income tax at a rate of 15.5% to the extent of foreign cash and certain other net current assets and 8% on the remaining earnings. We recorded a provisional amount for our one-time transitional tax liability as a reduction of net operating loss carryforwards totaling $14.5 million. We have recorded provisional amounts based on estimates of the effects of the Tax Act as the analysis requires significant data from our foreign subsidiaries that is not regularly collected or analyzed. Additional work is necessary to do a more detailed analysis of historical foreign earnings as well as potential correlative adjustments. Any subsequent adjustment to these amounts will be recorded to current tax expense in the quarter of 2018 when the analysis is complete.

F-21

Deferred tax effects

The Tax Act reduces the U.S. statutory tax rate from 35% to 21% for years after 2017. Accordingly, we have remeasured our deferred taxes as of December 31, 2017 to reflect the reduced rate that will apply in future periods when these deferred taxes are settled or realized. We recognized a deferred tax benefit of $1.8 million to reflect the reduced U.S. tax rate and other effects of the Tax Act. Although the tax rate reduction is known, we have not collected the necessary data to complete our analysis of the effect of the Tax Act on the underlying deferred taxes and as such, the amounts recorded as of December 31, 2017 are provisional.

The net tax expense recognized in 2017 related to the Tax Act was $12.7 million. As we complete our analysis of the Tax Act and incorporate additional guidance that may be issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, the IRS or other standard-setting bodies, we may identify additional effects not reflected as of December 31, 2017.

A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory income tax (benefit) expense to the Company’s effective income tax provision is as follows:

 

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2015  2014  2013 
Tax provision at statutory rate – federal  35.0%  34.0%  34.0%
Tax provision at effective state and local rates  (1.5%)  0.4%  0.8%
Foreign tax rate differential  (46.5%)  (23.3%)  (28.7%)
GAAP gain transfer of assets  (15.3%)  0.0%  0.0%
Transaction costs  8.3%  0.0%  0.0%
subpart F income  5.2%  0.0%  0.0%
Uncertain tax provisions  0.2%  0.9%  0.8%
Valuation allowance  0.6%  (1.2%)  2.4%
Incentive stock options  0.0%  0.4%  0.8%
Other  (1.5%)  0.0%  0.0%
Total effective income tax rate  (15.5%)  11.2%  10.1%

  For the years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
Tax provision at statutory rate – federal  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%
U.S. tax reform toll charge  562.2%  0.0%  0.0%
Tax rate change deferred revaluation  (63.3%)  0.0%  0.0%
Tax provision at effective state and local rates  23.9%  (21.1%)  (1.5%)
Foreign tax rate differential  (158.3%)  (216.4%)  (46.5%)
GAAP gain on transfer of assets  0.0%  0.0%  (15.3%)
Transaction costs  0.0%  0.0%  8.3%
Subpart F income  0.0%  0.0%  5.2%
Nondeductible expenses  6.5%  51.7%  0.0%
Uncertain tax provisions  1.2%  0.2%  0.2%
Valuation allowance  2.8%  22.1%  0.6%
Prior period adjustments  11.2%  (37.7%)  0.0%
Stock compensation  (9.5%)  0.0%  0.0%
Tax credits  (7.3%)  0.0%  0.0%
Other  0.0%  (5.9%)  (1.5%)
Total effective income tax rate  404.4%  (172.1%)  (15.5%)

 

The Company, through its parent Lindblad Expeditions, Inc. and a series of subsidiaries and affiliated entities in the U.S., the Cayman Islands, Ecuador and Australia are subject to US Federal, US state, Ecuadorian Federal and Australian Federal income taxes. The Cayman Islands do not impose federal or local income taxes.

 

Deferred tax assets (liabilities) atas of December 31, 20152017 and 20142016 are comprised of the following:

 

 As of December 31,  As of December 31, 
(In thousands) 2015  2014  2017  2016 
Net operating loss carryforward $11,809  $7,448  $16,292  $15,032 
Property and equipment  (274)  (196)  (8,880)  (236)
Valuation allowance  (8,385)  (7,448)  (8,863)  (8,795)
Stock-based compensation  (50)  -   9   124 
Intangibles  (1,022)  (1,923)
Other  116   (1)  20   (84)
Deferred tax assets (liabilities) $3,216  $(197)
Deferred tax (liabilities) assets $(2,444) $4,118 

 

F-22

The Company recognizes valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In assessing the likelihood of realization, management considers: (i) future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences; (ii) future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards; (iii) taxable income in prior carryback year(s) if carryback is permitted under applicable tax law; and (iv) tax planning strategies. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company had deferred tax assets related to Australian loss carryforwards of approximately $21.1$22.7 million and capital loss carryforwards of $6.8 million, which may be carried forward indefinitely. The Company also had deferred tax assets related to U.S. loss carryforwards of $13.4$26.8 million, which begin to expire in 2021. The Company excluded $4.2 million of U.S. net operating loss carryforwards from the calculation of the deferred tax assets presented above because it represents excess stock option deductions that did not reduce taxes payable in the U.S. The tax effect of these unrealized excess stock option deductions, if realized in the future, will result in an increase to paid-in capital rather than a reduction to the income tax expense.2027. The timing and manner in which the Company will utilize the net operating loss carryforwards in any year, or in total, may be limited in the future as a result of changes in the Company’s ownership and any limitations imposed by the jurisdictions in which the Company operates.

 

F-26

As a result of the transition to the territorial tax regime effectuated by the Tax Act described above, any potential dividends from our foreign subsidiaries would no longer be subject to tax in the United States. We continuedcontinue to assert our prior position regarding the repatriation of historical foreign earnings back to the U.S. Except for earnings that have been previously taxed in the U.S. under the subpart F rulesfrom our Ecuadorian and can be remitted to the U.S. without incurring additional income taxes, weAustralian subsidiaries. We currently have no intention to remit any additional undistributed earnings of our foreignEcuadorian and Australian subsidiaries in a taxable manner. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we have approximately $78.6 million and $61.0 million, respectively, of foreign undistributedWe no longer remain permanently reinvested in the earnings respectively. Should additional amounts of our foreign subsidiaries’ undistributed earningsCayman subsidiary. No taxes have been accrued as a result of this change because no taxes are expected to be remitted toimposed by either the U.S. as taxable dividends, we would expect that this would result in additional U.S. tax atUnited States or the Cayman Islands upon such a statutory rate of up to 35% and offset by any potential foreign tax credits. Due to uncertainty surrounding the timing and manner in which such distributions could occur, it is not practicable to estimate the amount of such liability.remittance.

 

The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating tax positions and determining the provision for income taxes. The Company establishes liabilities for tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes may be due. These liabilities are established when the Company believes that certain positions might be challenged despite its belief that its tax return positions are fully supportable. The Company adjusts these liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the outcome of a tax audit. The provision for income taxes includes the impact of changes to these liabilities.

 

The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits and does not include related interest and penalties for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013:2015:

 

 For the Years Ended December 31,  For the years ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2015  2014  2013  2017  2016  2015 
Beginning of year $447  $263  $144  $447  $473  $447 
Current year positions  26   194   123   -   (26)  26 
Currency adjustments  -   (10)  (4)
Prior year positions  (26)  -   - 
End of year $473  $447  $263  $421  $447  $473 

 

The amount of uncertain tax positions that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate at December 31, 20152017 and December 31, 20142016 was $0.3 million. Any changes in the next twelve months are not anticipated to have significant impact on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company. All

The Company has elected an accounting policy to classify interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the Company��s uncertain tax positions, if recognized, would affect its income tax expense. As of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, interest and penalties included in income tax expense were not significant.

 

The Company is subject to tax audits in all jurisdictions for which it files tax returns. Tax audits by their very nature are often complex and can require several years to complete. Currently, there is aare no U.S. federal, tax audit pending for 2013, and no state or foreign jurisdiction tax audits pending. The Company’s corporate U.S. federal and state tax returns from 2012 to 2014for the current year and the three prior years remain subject to examination by tax authorities and the Company’s foreign tax returns from 2011 to 2014for the current year and the four prior years remain subject to examination by tax authorities.

 

 F-27F-23 

 

NOTE 109 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Lease Commitments

 

The Company leases office space and equipment under long-term leases, which are classified as operating leases.

 

Future minimum rental commitments, under non-cancellable operating leases as of December 31, 2015, inclusive of leases entered into in 2015,2017 are as follows:

 

  Minimum 
  Lease 
For the years ended December 31, Payments 
(In thousands)    
2018 $936 
2019  1,154 
2020  1,094 
2021  1,049 
2022  1,104 
Thereafter  2,737 
  $8,074 

  Minimum Lease 
For the Years Ended December 31, Payments 
  (In thousands) 
2016 $841 
2017  856 
2018  752 
2019  609 
2020  609 
Thereafter  2,674 
  $6,341 

The amounts above include the future minimum rental commitment of $3.1 million related to the 88 months lease for the shoreside facility in Seattle that was executed February 8, 2018.

 

Rent expense was approximately $0.9$1.2 million, $0.8$1.1 million and $0.7$0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively. These amounts are recorded within general and administrative expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of income.operations.

 

Fleet Expansion

 

During the third quarter of 2015, the Company signed a non-binding letter of intent to build two new coastal vessels with expected deliveries on target for the second quarter of 2017 and 2018, respectively. On December 2, 2015, the Company entered into two separate Vessel Construction Agreements, (collectively, the “Agreements”) with Ice Floe, LLC, a Washington limited liability company doing business as Nichols Brothers Boat Builders (the “Builder”). The Agreements provide for the Builder to construct two new 236-foot 100-passenger cruise vessels at a purchasevessels.

The company paid Ice Floe LLC $53.6 million related to theNational Geographic Quest and the vessel was delivered in July of 2017. The Company amended the agreement for the second vessel, theNational Geographic Venture, in October 2017. The current contract price of $48.0is $57.0 million and $46.8 million, respectively, payable monthly based on the value of the work performed through the end of the preceding month.

The Buildervessel is requiredscheduled to deliver the vesselsbe completed in the secondfourth quarter of 2017 and the second quarter of 2018, respectively, subject to extension for certain events, such as change orders. The riskAs of loss or damage to the vessels remains with the Builder until the vessel is delivered to and accepted by the Company. If the Builder fails to deliver either vessel within 30 days following the applicable delivery date,December 31, 2017, the Company is entitledhas paid Ice Floe, LLC $23.8 million related to liquidated damages in the amount of $15,000 per day thereafter (not to exceed $500,000 for either vessel)National Geographic Venture. The Agreements each provide for a one-year warranty of the vessels for defects in workmanship or materials under normal use and service, which is capped at $3.0 million in the aggregate for both vessels. The Company may terminate the applicable AgreementsAgreement in the event the Builder fails to deliver the vessel within 180one hundred eighty days of the applicable due date or the Builder becomes insolvent or otherwise bankrupt. The AgreementsAgreement also containcontains customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities.

In November 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with Ulstein Verft to construct a polar ice class vessel with a total purchase price of 1,066.0 million Norwegian Kroner (NOK). Subsequently, LME exercised its right to make payments in United States Dollars, which resulted in a purchase price of $134.6 million, including hedging costs. The purchase price is subject to potential adjustments from contract specifications for variations in speed, deadweight, fuel consumption and delivery date, and is due in installments. The first twenty percent of the purchase price was paid shortly after execution of the Agreement with the remaining eighty percent due upon delivery and acceptance of the vessel. The vessel is targeted to be delivered in January 2020, with potential accelerated delivery to November 2019. The contract also includes options to build two additional ice class vessels, the first for delivery twelve months after the initial vessel and the second for delivery twelve months thereafter.  

Royalty Agreement – National Geographic

 

The Company is engaged in an alliance and license agreement with National Geographic, which allows the Company to use the National Geographic name and logo. In return for these rights, the Company is charged a royalty fee. The royalty fee is included within selling and marketing expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of income.operations. The amount is calculated based upon a percentage of certain ticket revenuerevenues less travel agent commission, including the revenuerevenues received from cancellation fees and any revenuerevenues received from the sale of voyage extensions. A voyage extension occurs when a guest extends theirhis or her trip with pre- or post-voyage hotel nights and is included within tour revenues on the accompanying consolidated statements of income.operations. The royalty expense is recognized at the time of revenue recognition. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for a description of the Company’s revenue recognition policy. Royalty expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 2014 and 2013 totaled $4.8$5.2 million, $4.1$4.9 million and $3.4$4.8 million, respectively.

 

F-24

The balances outstandingpayable to National Geographic as of December 31, 20152017 and 20142016 are $1.3$1.7 million and $1.0$1.5 million, respectively, and are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

F-28

 

In March 2015, Lindblad and National Geographic extended their alliance and license agreement until the year 2025. Payment of royalties earned during the extension period will be valued and recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements in a manner consistent with the foregoing disclosure.

 

In connection with the merger on July 8, 2015, the Company, Mr. Lindblad and National Geographic entered into a Call Option agreement where Mr. Lindblad agreed to grant National Geographic an option to purchase 2,387,499 of Mr. Lindblad’s shares in the Company as consideration for the assumption of the alliance and license agreements and the tour operator agreement. The Company recorded a $13.8 million long-term asset using a fair value of $5.76 per option share. The Company is amortizing the cost until March 31, 2020. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2015,2017 and 2016, the Company recorded amortization of the National Geographic fee of $2.9 million and $2.9 million, respectively, within selling and marketing expense on the consolidated statements of income, $1.4 million in amortization of the National Geographic fee.operations. The asset was valued using a Black-Scholes valuation method with the following assumptions:

 

Stock price at July 9, 2015: $10.75 
Exercise price: $10.00 
Expected term:   5 years 
Volatility:  60%
Risk free rate:  1.58%
Dividend rate:  0%

Royalty Agreement – World Wildlife Fund

Natural Habitat has a license agreement with World Wildlife Fund, which allows it to use the WWF name and logo. In return for these rights, Natural Habitat is charged a royalty fee and a fee based on annual gross sales. The fees are included within selling and marketing expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The annual royalty payment and gross sales fees are paid on a quarterly basis. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, these fees totaled $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

Royalty Agreement – Islander

 

Under a perpetual royalty agreement, the Company is obligated to pay a third party, based upon net revenues generated through tours conducted on theNational Geographic Islander. Royalty payments are charged to cost of tours expenses. Royalty expense for the years ended December 31 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $0.7million, $0.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

Charter Commitments

 

From time to time, the Company enters into agreements to charter vessels onto which it holds its tours and expeditions. Future minimum payments on its charter agreements are as follows:

 

For the Years Ended December 31, Amount 
 (In thousands) 
2016 $8,053 
2017  7,135 
For the years ended December 31, Amount 
(In thousands)   
2018  2,248   9,334 
2019  1,482   5,241 
Total $18,918  $14,575 

 

Royalty Agreement – Islander

Under a perpetual royalty agreement, the Company is obligated to pay annually a royalty based upon net revenues generated through tours conducted on theNational Geographic Islander as provided in the table below.

Annual Net RevenueRoyalty
Less than or equal to $6.0 million (minimum annual royalty payment)$225,000
Less than or equal to $7.0 million but more than $6.0 million$275,000
More than $7.0 million$275,000 + 5% of excess

Royalty payments from inception were charged against the contingent royalty obligation. Royalty payments in excess of the contingent royalty obligation were charged to cost of tours expenses. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, there was no remaining balance of the contingent royalty obligation. Contingent royalty expense for the years ended December 31 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $0.7 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

Other Commitments

 

The Company participates, with other tour operators, in the Consumer Protection Insurance Plan sponsored by the United States Tour Operators Association (“USTOA”). The USTOA requires a $1.0 million performance bond, letter of credit or assigned certificate of deposit from its members to insure this plan. The Company has assigned a $1.0 million letter of credit to the USTOA to satisfy this requirement. This letter of credit will be used only if the Company becomes insolvent and cannot refund its customers’ deposits.

 

F-29

The Company self-insures cancellation insurance extended to guests. Further, the Company contracts with an unrelated insurance company to administer the guest insurance program, which includes additional guest-related insurance coverage purchased by guests. In connection with the program, the Company has provided a $150,000 letter of credit to the insurance company to cover unpaid premiums.

 

F-25

Operational Agreement

 

The Company maintains an agreement with a third party in the Galápagos who provides operations support for the Company’s vessels stationed there. The agreement expired in 2014, and was renewed in 2015 for a five-year term as discussed below.

On February 11, 2015, the Company entered into a renewal agreement with Empresa Turistica Internacional C.A., the third-party company that provides advisory and administrative services along with the required actions for the secure and successful operation of theNational Geographic Endeavour II andNational Geographic Islander in the Galápagos. This agreement is in effect from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2019.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

The Company is involved in various claims, legal actions and regulatory proceedings arising from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Other than the matters set forth below, inIn the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will notthere are no outstanding proceedings that are expected to have a material adverse effect on the combinedour financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In November 2013, two shareholders of the Company holding minority interests filed a lawsuit against the Company and, derivatively, against its directors and certain of its lenders alleging, among other matters, a breach of the plaintiffs’ preemptive rights, conflicts of interest and breaches of fiduciary duty, all purportedly arising out of the Company’s 2009 and 2012 refinancings of its credit facilities, the grant in connection therewith to the Company’s lenders of a warrant to purchase stock of the Company, the adoption of the Company’s incentive stock option plan, and other transactions. The Company and the other defendants filed motions to dismiss. Prior to a ruling by the Court on the motions to dismiss, the parties entered into an agreement providing for the purchase by the Company of all the shares of Company stock held by plaintiffs and the settlement of all claims. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the case was dismissed with prejudice in November 2014. In connection with the settlement and purchase of the plaintiffs’ shares, the Company paid $11.3 million in cash to the plaintiffs, net of amounts recovered through insurance.

 

NOTE 1110 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

 

The Company has a 401(k) profit sharing plan and trust for its employees. The Company matchesmatched 30% in 2017 and 25% in 2016 and 2015, respectively, of employee contributions up to annual maximum of $2,100 for 2017, $1,800 for 2016 and $1,500 and $1,000 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.2015. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, the Company’s benefit plan contribution amounted to $0.3 million, $0.2 million $0.1 million and $0.1$0.2 million, respectively. The benefit plan contribution is recorded within general and administrative expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of income.operations.

 

NOTE 1211SHAREHOLDERS’STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

Capital Stock

 

The Company has a total of 201,000,000 authorized shares of capital stock, consisting of 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized, $0.0001 par value and 200,000,000 shares of common stock authorized, $0.0001 par value.

Capitol Initial Public Offering and Warrants

In connection with its initial public offering, on May 15, 2013, Capitol sold 20,000,000 units at $10.00 per unit, including 2,000,000 units under the underwriters’ over-allotment option, generating gross proceeds of $200.0 million. Each unit consisted of one share of Capitol’s common stock, $0.0001 par value and one half of one redeemable warrant to purchase one share of common stock. The shares of common stock and the warrants included in the units traded as a unit until July 1, 2013 when separate trading of common stock and warrants began. In connection with the consummation of the merger with LEX, Capitol forced the separation of the units into the separate components of common stock and warrants. Each whole warrant entitles its holder, upon exercise, to purchase one share of common stock for $11.50 subject to certain adjustments, during the period that commenced thirty days after the completion of the merger between LEX and terminating five years thereafter.

The warrants may be redeemed by the Company, at its option, in whole and not in part, at a price of $0.01 per warrant at any time the warrants are exercisable, upon a minimum of 30 days prior written notice of redemption, if, and only if, the last sales price of the Company’s shares of common stock equals or exceeds $24.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations and recapitalizations) for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending three business days before the Company sends the redemption notice; and if, and only if, there is a current registration statement in effect with respect to the shares of common stock underlying such warrants.

If the Company calls the warrants for redemption as described above, the Company’s management will have the option to require all holders that wish to exercise warrants to do so on a “cashless basis.” In such event, each holder would pay the exercise price by surrendering the warrants for that number of shares of common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of shares of common stock underlying the warrants, multiplied by the difference between the exercise price of the warrants and the fair market value by (y) the fair market value. The fair market value will mean the average reported last sale price of the shares of common stock for the five trading days ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of warrants.

Certain of the outstanding warrants were privately acquired from the Company by Capitol’s sponsor and certain of the Company’s initial officers and directors and are identical to the warrants included in the units sold in the offering except that such warrants: (i) are not be redeemable by the Company and (ii) may be exercised for cash or on a cashless basis, in each case so long as they are held by the initial purchasers or any of their permitted transferees.

 

 F-30F-26 

 

ContributionsStock and DistributionsWarrant Repurchase Plan

On November 2, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a $15.0 million increase to the Company’s existing stock and warrant repurchase plan (“Repurchase Plan”), to $35.0 million. This Repurchase Plan, which was authorized in November 2015, authorizes the Company to purchase from time to time the Company’s outstanding common stock and warrants. Any shares and warrants purchased will be retired. The Repurchase Plan has no time deadline and will continue until otherwise modified or terminated at the sole discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. The repurchases exclude shares repurchased to settle statutory employee tax withholding related to the vesting of stock awards. All repurchases were made using cash resources. In 2015, the Company repurchased 2,091,618 warrants for $5.5 million. In 2016, the Company repurchased 2,821,995 warrants for $7.3 million and 308,718 shares of its common stock for $3.0 million. In 2017 the Company repurchased a total of 529,867 warrants for $1.1 million and 547,058 shares of common stock for $5.1 million pursuant to the Repurchase Plan. The Company has cumulatively repurchased 855,776 shares of common stock for $8.1 million and 5,443,480 warrants for $14.0 million, since plan inception. The balance as of February 26, 2018 for the repurchase plan was $12.1 million.

2017 Long-Term Incentive Compensation

 

In connection withMarch 2017, the common control mergerCompany’s compensation committee (or a subcommittee thereof) approved awards of FPH, CFMF was deemedrestricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance share units (“PSUs”) to have madekey employees under the Company’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The Company granted 171,388 RSUs on April 3, 2017 at a distributiongrant price of $8.98. The RSU’s will vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the Company of $24.0 millionrecipient’s continued employment or service with us or our subsidiaries on November 30, 2012, representing the net assets of FPH. During December 31, 2012, DVB made a contribution to FPH of $2.1 million in cash. On April 11, 2013 the Company was deemed to have distributed to CFMF $12.3 million in connection with the Company’s purchase of FPH for cash and notes with the simultaneous removal of the FPH entity originally recorded with the common control merger.

Shares Subject to Redemptionapplicable vesting date. 

 

The CompanyPSUs are performance-vesting equity incentive awards that will be earned based on our performance against metrics relating to annual Adjusted EBITDA, annual revenue, and certain of its stockholders who acquired shares through the exercise of stock options, entered into agreements providing for the redemption of outstanding sharesguest satisfaction. Awards will vest after a three-year performance period and may be earned at any time by the holder. Accordingly, these shares are subject to repurchase under the terms of these agreements. As a resultlevel ranging from 0%-200% of the merger, these stockholders agreed to relinquish their rightsnumber of any kind to causePSUs granted, depending on performance. On April 3, 2017, the Company to repurchaseawarded 126,953 of targeted PSUs with the number of shares determined based upon the closing price of our common stock on March 31, 2017 of $8.96. Based on the Company subject to redemption.

Asfinancial statements as of December 31, 2015, there were no shares2017, the Company assessed the applicable metrics related to the PSU grants, determined the blended probability of achieving the performance metrics and options outstanding subject to such redemption, with no aggregate redemption value. As of December 31, 2014, there were 1,912,833 shares and options outstanding subject to such redemption, with aggregate redemption values of $5.0 million. The Company had recorded this redemption obligation as a liabilityvalued the awards based on the consolidated balance sheet.fair value at the date of grant with the amount of stock compensation expense determined based on the number of PSU’s expected to vest.

2016 CEO Share Allocation Plan

 

Adoption ofIn April 2016, the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan

The Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2016 CEO Share Allocation Plan (the “2016 Plan”) and in June 2016, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2016 CEO Share Allocation Plan, pursuant to which the Company will grant awards covering up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in the form of restricted stock, restricted stock units, and/or other stock- or cash-based awards to eligible employees and other service providers of the Company. The 2016 CEO Share Allocation Plan was adopted in connection with a contribution agreement that the Company entered into with Sven-Olof Lindblad, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, pursuant to which Mr. Lindblad will transfer up to 1,000,000 shares from his holdings of the Company’s common stock (i.e., an equivalent number of shares as is reserved for issuance under the 2016 CEO Share Allocation Plan) (the “Contribution Shares”) to the Company as a contribution to the capital of the Company. Mr. Lindblad will not receive any consideration in exchange for the Contribution Shares. However, as a condition to the contribution of any Contribution Shares, the Company must grant awards under the 2016 CEO Share Allocation Plan, such that the number of Contribution Shares that Mr. Lindblad actually contributes to the Company will equal the number of shares corresponding to awards granted under the plan. The contribution of the Contribution Shares by Mr. Lindblad to the Company will effectively reduce the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that are outstanding by the same number of shares that would be issued under the 2016 CEO Share Allocation Plan (or a lesser number in the event awards are settled in cash). Such contributions will be effective as of the date the Company grants corresponding awards under the 2016 CEO Share Allocation Plan. The administrator may amend, suspend or terminate the 2016 CEO Share Allocation Plan at any time.

On January 10, 2017, Mr. Lindblad contributed to the Company and the Company thereafter granted, 716,550 restricted shares at a grant price of $9.65. The grants vest in three equal installments on January 10, 2017, January 10, 2018 and January 10, 2019.

F-27

2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan

In July 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors and shareholders approved the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan subject to shareholder approval,(the “2015 Plan”), which was obtained on July 8, 2015. The 2015 Plan is administered by the Board and allowsof Directors, allowing the Company to issue up to 2,500,000 shares of its common stock to employees, consultants and non-employee directors providing a valuable service to the Company.directors. The 2015 Plan provides for the grant of stock options, including incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock or cash-based awards. The Board of Directors has the authority to determine the amount and type of each award. The 2015 Plan expires on July 8, 2025. All options granted under the 2015 Plan will be at exercise prices not less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

 

Performance Share Units

Performance shares are shares of stock granted to an employee, non-employee director or other service providers for which sale is prohibited for a specified period of time. PSUs represent a promise to deliver shares to the employee, non-employee director or other service providers at a future date if certain vesting conditions are met. The Company does not deliver the shares associated with the PSUs to the employee, non-employee director or other service providers until the vesting conditions are met.

The following table is a summary of restricted stock and PSU activity under the Company’s 2015 Plan:

  PSU’s  Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 
PSUs unvested as of December 31, 2016 -  $- 
Granted  126,953   8.98 
Vested  -   - 
Forfeited  (39,161)  8.98 
PSUs unvested as of December 31, 2017  87,792  $8.98 

Restricted Shares and Restricted Share Units

 

Restricted shares are shares of stock granted to an employee, non-employee director or other service providers for which sale is prohibited for a specified period of time. Restricted share units (“RSUs”)RSUs represent a promise to deliver shares to the employee, non-employee director or other service providers at a future date if certain vesting conditions are met. The difference between RSUs and restricted shares is primarily the timing of the delivery of the underlying shares. A company that grants RSUsCompany does not deliver the shares associated with the RSUs to the employee, non-employee director or other service providers until the vesting conditions are met.

 

F-31

The following table is a summary of restricted stock and RSU activity under the Company’s 2015 Plan:

  Restricted Shares and RSU’s  Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 
Restricted shares and RSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2016  202,091  $9.90 
Granted  940,147   9.56 
Vested  (299,951)  9.72 
Forfeited  (63,945)  9.41 
Restricted shares and RSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2017  778,342  $9.60 

 

Under the 2015 Plan, four members of the Board were granted restricted shares and one member of the Board was granted RSUs on January 4, 2016. There were 6,660 restricted shares or RSUs granted to each member and they vest in three installments on August 8, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and are not subject to any performance-based conditions.

Based on the terms above, each share had a value of $11.26 per share for a total of $0.4 million for all five board members. Stock compensation of $0.4 million for all five board members will be amortized over the service period between January 4, 2016 and August 8, 2018. The amortization of the stock compensation for all board members is expected to be approximately $0.1 million per year.

Stock Options

 

TheStock compensation expense related to options are recorded based on the fair value of stock options isoption grants, amortized on a straight linestraight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the respective awards. Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options was $4.9 million, $0.3 million and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Stock compensation expense is included within general and administrative expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. As of December 31, 2015, the unamortized value of options was $11.0 million and is expected to be expensed over a period of 2.6 years.

On December 11, 2014, the Company granted stock options for the purchase of 13,480 shares of its Class A common stock at an exercise price of $498 per share under the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Lindblad Plan”) to two officers of the Company. At the merger date, the Company assumed the 13,480 outstanding Lindblad stock options granted under the Lindblad Plan and converted such options into options to purchase an aggregate of 3,821,696 shares of common stock of the Company with an exercise price of $1.76 per share. Under the assumption agreement, the exercise proceeds, service period and other terms remained the same, except for the vesting dates and option term. There were no incremental costs resulting from the modification of the equity awards and the requisite service is expected to be rendered with no change in theemployee’s required service period. Therefore, the total recognized compensation cost for the equity awards remains the fair value at the original grant date (ASC 718-20). The original grant date value per share for the equity awards was $1,423.62 per share and at the merger date, the original grant date value was converted to $3.81 per share.

During September 2015, 1,272,625 option shares vested and were exercised. The option shares were issued using cashless transactions, approved by management, and were used in exchange for the required exercise proceeds and payment of any related payroll withholding taxes. Using a fair value of $9.30 per share and an exercise price of $1.76 per share, 240,841 shares were transferred to provide the $2.2 million in exercise proceeds required for the transactions. Using a fair value of $9.30 per share, 524,662 shares were transferred to provide the $4.9 million in proceeds required to pay the payroll withholding taxes for the transactions. The balance of the option shares of 507,122 shares were issued as a result of the transactions.

The Company estimated the fair value of employee stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair values of employee stock options granted under the Lindblad Plan and 2015 Plan were estimated using the following assumptions:

 

 Option grants 
      Weighted 
      Average 
 December 11, 2014
Option Grants
  November 10, 2015
Option Grants
  12/11/14  11/10/15  2016 
Stock price $5.02  $10.58  $5.02  $10.58  $9.63 
Exercise price $1.76  $10.58   1.76   10.58   9.63 
Dividend yield  0%  0%  0.00%  0.00%  0.00%
Expected volatility  60.0%  60.0%  60.00%  60.00%  60.00%
Risk-free interest rate  2.19%  1.72%  2.19%  1.72%  1.18%
Expected term  5.11 years   5.11 years 
Expected term in years  5.11   5.11   5.11 

 

 F-32F-28 

 

The following table is a summary of activity under the Lindblad Plan and 2015 Plan:

 

   Weighted Weighted Weighted         Weighted    
   Average Average Average Aggregate     Weighted Average    
   Exercise Grant Date Contractual Intrinsic  Option Average Exercise Contractual  Life Aggregate Intrinsic 
 * Shares * Price * Fair Value Life (Years) * Value  Shares  Price  (Years)  Value 
            
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2012  1,992,782  $0.11  $3.27   10.0  $6,622,583 
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2016  2,130,848  $2.57   2.8  $14,654,221 
Granted  -   -   -          -   -         
Exercised  -   -   -          955,424   1.76        
Forfeited  -   -   -          -   -         
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2013  1,992,782  0.11  $3.27   9.0  6,926,869 
Granted  3,821,696   1.76   3.81        
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2017  1,175,424  $3.23   2.4  $7,707,255 
Exercisable as of December 31, 2016  -   -         
Vested #  955,424   1.76         
Exercised  (1,182,798)  0.11   3.27          (955,424)  1.76         
Forfeited  -   -   -          -   -         
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2014  4,631,680  1.47  $3.72   9.7  16,315,198 
Granted  300,000   10.58   5.54        
Exercised  (2,082,609)  1.12   3.60        
Forfeited  -   -   -        
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2015  2,849,071  $2.69  $9.02   3.7  $18,032,173 
                   
Vested and expected to vest after December 31, 2015  2,849,071  $2.69  $9.02   3.7  $18,032,173 
                   
Exercisable as of December 31, 2012  1,992,782  $0.11  $3.27        
Vested  -   -   -        
Exercised  -   -   -        
Forfeited  -   -   -        
Exercisable as of December 31, 2013  1,992,782  0.11  3.27        
Vested  -   -   -        
Exercised  (1,182,798)  1.12   3.60        
Forfeited  -   -   -        
Exercisable as of December 31, 2014  809,984  0.11  3.27        
Vested  1,272,625   1.76   3.81        
Exercised  (2,082,609)  1.12   3.60        
Forfeited  -   -   -        
Exercisable as of December 31, 2015  -                
Exercisable as of December 31, 2017  -   -       - 

 

*Option# Vested shares do not include 955,424 shares vested as of December 31, 2017 but not exercisable until January 1, 2018.

Stock Compensation Expense

Stock-based compensation expense for 2017, 2016 and values2015 was $10.6 million, $5.4 million and $4.9 million, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses. The total income tax benefit recognized for stock based compensation plans for 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, unrecognized stock-based compensation costs were adjusted for conversion at the merger date, July 8, 2015.$6.0 million. This amount is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately one year.

 

NOTE 1312 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS – SHAREHOLDER STOCKHOLDERLOANS

 

Other than as described below, since January 1, 2015, the Company has not entered into, and there are no currently proposed, related party transactions.

 

Capitol Acquisition Corp. II

In February 2011, Capitol issued 4,417,684 shares of common stock to Capitol Acquisition Management 2 LLC (an affiliate of Mark D. Ein, Capitol’s former Chief Executive Officer and a the current Chairman of the Company) for $25,000 in cash, at a purchase price of approximately $0.006 share, in connection with Capitol’s organization. In March 2013, Capitol’s sponsor contributed an aggregate of 105,184 shares of Capitol’s common stock to Capitol’s capital, resulting in its sponsor owning an aggregate of 4,312,500 founder’s shares. The sponsor received no consideration for this contribution. Such contribution was made solely to maintain the sponsor’s collective 20% ownership interest in Capitol’s shares of common stock based on the current size of Capitol’s initial public offering. Thereafter, also in March 2013, Capitol’s sponsor transferred an aggregate of 1,078,126 founder’s shares to Capitol’s then executive officers and directors. In April 2013, Capitol’s sponsor and L. Dyson Dryden (Capitol’s former Chief Financial Officer and a current director of the Company) transferred an aggregate of 22,998 founder’s shares to Messrs. Calcano, Donaldson and Sodha (each a former director of Capitol), resulting in Capitol’s sponsor owning an aggregate of 3,222,875 founder’s shares and Mr. Dryden owning an aggregate of 974,626 founder’s shares. The sponsor received no consideration for these transfers. In May 2013, Capitol effected a stock dividend of 0.2 shares for each outstanding share of common stock, resulting in Capitol’s sponsor and officers and directors holding an aggregate of 5,175,000 founder’s shares, of which 175,000 shares were subsequently forfeited.

F-33

 

All of the initial shares of common stock issued by Capitol to its sponsor and initial stockholdersshareholders (Capitol Acquisition Management 2 LLC, L. Dyson Dryden, Lawrence Calcano, Richard C. Donaldson and Piyush Sodha) were placed in escrow with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as escrow agent, until one year after the date of the consummation of the Capitol’s merger with Lindblad (July 8, 2016) or earlier if, the last sales price of its common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations and recapitalizations) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 150 days after July 8, 2015 or the Company consummates a subsequent liquidation, merger, share exchange or other similar transaction which results in all of its stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property. In addition, initial shares held in escrow includeincluding certain founder forfeiture shares which are subject to forfeiture in the event the last sales price of our stock does not equal or exceed $13.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period within four years following July 8, 2015. SuchThe portion of the founder shares not subject to forfeiture were released from escrow following July 8, 2016. The founder forfeiture shares remain in escrow and will be released from escrow atwhen and if the same time as the other initial shares to the extent they have been earned at such time.conditions for release set forth above are satisfied.

 

Commencing on May 10, 2013, Capitol paid Venturehouse Group, LLC, an affiliate of Mark D. Ein, a fee of $7,500 per month for providing Capitol with office space and certain office and administrative services through the initial business combination of July 8, 2015. This arrangement was solely for Capitol’s benefit and was not intended to provide Mr. Ein compensation in lieu of a salary. For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the aggregate cash fee paid to Venturehouse Group, LLC was $45.0 thousand, $90.0 thousand and $62.4 thousand, respectively.thousand.

 

To meet Capitol’s working capital needs, from time to time, Capitol’s officers, directors, initial stockholdersshareholders or their affiliates loaned Capitol funds in their sole discretion prior to the initial business combination. The aggregate amount of the loans was approximately $1.6 million. All loans were repaid upon consummation of the Company’s initial business combination, without interest, with the exception of $0.5 million of the notes that were converted into warrants at a price of $1.00 per warrant at such time.

 

The holders of Capitol’s initial shares, as well as the holders of the sponsor warrants and all note conversion warrants are entitled to registration rights pursuant to an agreement signed in connection with Capitol’s initial public offering. The Company filed a Form S-3 resale registration statement required by such registration rights agreement that was declared effective by the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on September 16, 2015.

F-29

 

Capitol reimbursed its officers and directors for reasonable out-of-pocket business expenses incurred by them in connection with certain activities on its behalf such as identifying and investigating possible target businesses and business combinations prior to the initial business combination. As of July 8, 2015, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, Capitol had reimbursed its initial stockholdersshareholders approximately $53.8 thousand, $38.2 thousand and $26.0 thousand, respectively,$0.1 million for out-of-pocket business expenses incurred by them in connection with activities on its behalf.

 

Other than the fees described above and reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses payable to Capitol’s officers and directors, no compensation or fees of any kind, including finder’s fees, consulting fees or other similar compensation, were paid to any of Capitol’s initial stockholders,shareholders, including its officers or directors, or to any of their respective affiliates, prior to or for services rendered in connection with the business combination.

 

Lindblad Expeditions, Inc.

 

On November 3, 2014, LindbladLEX and Sven-Olof Lindblad entered into a certain Loan and Security Agreement (“Loan Agreement”) and a certain Promissory Note made by Mr. Lindblad in favor of LindbladLEX for a maximum aggregate principal amount of up to $3.5 million. The interest rates of the Promissory Note were the applicable federal rate for loans of equal tenor for the months in which amounts were provided to Mr. Lindblad by Lindblad,LEX, as published by the Internal Revenue Service for purposes of Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. Mr. Lindblad pledged his right, title and interest in and to all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of LindbladLEX held by him to LindbladLEX as collateral for repayment of the Promissory Note. The Promissory Note was satisfied and the Loan Agreement terminated on March 9, 2015 pursuant to the Assignment and Assumption Agreement described below. Prior to such satisfaction and termination, approximately $2.8 million had been advanced by LindbladLEX to Mr. Lindblad and no principal or interest had been repaid by Mr. Lindblad.

 

F-34

On March 9, 2015, Mr. Lindblad and LindbladLEX entered into an Assignment and Assumption Agreement pursuant to which Mr. Lindblad (i) assigned and transferred to LindbladLEX his right to receive a $5.0 million fee payable by DVB and (ii) exercised his outstanding option to purchase 2,857 shares of Lindblad’sLEX’s stock for an aggregate exercise price of $92.5 thousand. In exchange for the assignment to LindbladLEX of the fee payable by DVB, all of Mr. Lindblad’s obligations under the Loan Agreement described above were deemed satisfied in full, the Loan Agreement and related Promissory Note were terminated, and Mr. Lindblad’s obligation to pay the aggregate exercise price for the exercise of the option described above was satisfied in full. Following receipt of the fee from DVB, LindbladLEX paid to Mr. Lindblad an amount equal to (a) the fee paid by DVB, less (b) the outstanding amount of principal and interest owed under the Loan Agreement at the time of entry into the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, the aggregate exercise price payable in connection with the exercise of the option, and a collection premium equal to one percent of the outstanding amount of principal and interest payable in connection with the loan, and less (c) any required withholding taxes.

 

Prior to the debt refinancing and the completion of the purchase of CFMF on May 8, 2015, CFMF served as the junior lender pursuant to Lindblad’sLEX’s junior credit facility. CFMF was deemed to have control of LindbladLEX through (a) CFMF’s possession of a warrant to purchase 60% of LindbladLEX for nominal consideration that could be exercised at any time and (b) a shareholder agreement between CFMF and LindbladLEX under which CFMF was declared to be in control of LindbladLEX and for which CFMF was awarded two of the three seats on Lindblad’sLEX’s Board of Directors. On December 11, 2014, LindbladLEX entered into a Profit Participation Loan Purchase Agreement with DVB, a Profit Participation Rights Purchase Agreement with Buss Kreuzfahrtfonds 1 GmbH & Co. KG and Buss Kreuzfahrtfonds 2 GmbH& Co. KG, and a Stock Purchase Agreement with Cruise/Ferry Finance Partners Private Foundation. These three agreements enabled LindbladLEX to purchase the financial and equity interests in CFMF in order to recapture and extinguish a warrant to purchase 60% of the outstanding equity of LindbladLEX on a fully diluted basis. On December 11, 2014, the date of the purchase agreements, an initial payment of $25.0 million was made to DVB under the Profit Participation Loan Purchase Agreement. The remaining payments of (i) $22.7 million to DVB, (ii) $48.4 million to Buss Kreuzfahrtfonds 1 GmbH & Co. KG and Buss Kreuzfahrtfonds 2 GmbH & Co. KG, as increased by $339,100 per month from December 31, 2014 until the close of the transaction, and (iii) $1.00 to Cruise/Ferry Financing Partners Private Foundation were made on May 8, 2015. DVB served as agent and security trustee under Lindblad’sLEX’s credit facilities prior to the refinancing on May 8, 2015, and was one of the Senior Lenders under the then current senior credit facility. In connection with the purchase of CFMF completed on May 8, 2015, the senior credit facility was paid off and the junior credit facility was cancelled.

 

LindbladThe Company and National Geographic collaborate on exploration, research, technology and conservation in order to provide travel experiences and disseminate geographic knowledge around the globe. The Lindblad/National Geographicallianceis set forth in (i) an Alliance and License Agreement and (ii) a Tour Operator Agreement.During 2015, Lindbladcalendar year 2017, LEX paid an aggregate of $4.8$5.2 million to National Geographic under these agreements, which isare included withinselling and marketing expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of income.operations. The extension of the agreements between LindbladLEX and National Geographic in connection with the mergers was contingent on the execution by Mr. Lindblad of an option agreement granting National Geographic the right to purchase from Mr. Lindblad, for a per share price of $10.00 per share, five percent of the issued and outstanding shares of Capitol’s common stock asJuly 8, 2015,including all outstanding options, warrants or other derivative securities (excluding options granted under the 2015 Plan, 15,600,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants and 1,250,000 shares of escrowed common stock, unless such escrowed shares are released from escrow, in which case such shares will be included in the 5% calculation).

F-30

On May 4, 2016, in connection with the Natural Habitat acquisition, Natural Habitat issued an unsecured promissory note to Mr. Bressler with an outstanding principal amount of $2.5 million due at maturity on December 31, 2020.

 

In connection with the mergers, the stockholdersshareholders of Capitol prior to its initial public offering — Capitol Acquisition Management 2 LLC, L. Dyson Dryden, Lawrence Calcano, Richard C. Donaldson and Piyush Sodha —collectively agreed to make a charitable contribution of an aggregate of 500,000 founder’s shares in Capitol to the Lindblad Expeditions – National Geographic Joint Fund for Exploration and Conservation (“LEX-NG Fund”), established by National Geographic, for no additional consideration. The LEX-NG Fund is managed jointly by a Lindblad staff member and a National Geographic staff member and the board is comprised of five members with Mr. Lindblad acting as Chairman.

 

NOTE 13 – SEGMENT INFORMATION

During the second quarter of 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of Natural Habitat. As a result of the acquisition, the Company updated its reporting information and its operating segments to add Natural Habitat as a separate operating and reporting segment.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, total assets for the Lindblad segment and Natural Habitat segment were $382.7 and $49.6 and $366.0 million and $41.7 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were $4.8 and $5.5 million, respectively, of intangibles, net related to the Lindblad segment. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 there were $22.1 million in goodwill and $4.8 and $5.6 million in intangibles, respectively, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet that were related to the Natural Habitat segment.

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, amortization of tradenames of $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and customer lists of $0.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively, were related to the Natural Habitat segment. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 there were $1.4 million and $0.9 million in depreciation and amortization expense and $0.7 and $0.1 million in capital expenditures, respectively, related to the Natural Habitat segment. There were $2.0 and $0.5 million in intercompany tour revenues between the Lindblad and Natural Habitat segments eliminated in consolidation for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, amortization expense related to operating rights were $0.7, $0.7 and $0.3 million, respectively, for the Lindblad segment. Capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $79.8, $75.9 and $14.8 million, respectively, for the Lindblad segment. Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $16.0, $18.0 and $11.6 million, respectively, for the Lindblad segment.

The Company evaluates the performance of its business segments based largely on tour revenues and operating income, and results of the segments without allocating other income and expenses, net, income taxes and interest expense, net. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the following operating results were:

  For the years ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2017  2016  Change  %  2015  Change  % 
Tour revenues:                     
Lindblad $216,815  $207,836  $8,979   4% $209,985  $(2,149)  (1%)
Natural Habitat*  49,689   34,510   15,179   44%  -   34,510   NA 
Total tour revenues $266,504  $242,346  $24,158   10% $209,985  $32,361   15%
Operating income:                            
Lindblad $7,292  $11,794  $(4,502)  (38%) $15,502  $3,708   (24%)
Natural Habitat*  3,452   2,187   1,265   58%  -   (2,187)  NA 
Total operating income $10,744  $13,981  $(3,237)  (23%) $15,502  $1,521   (10%)

* The 2016 Natural Habitat segment results represent activity from acquisition date of May 2016 through December 31, 2016.

 F-35F-31 

 

NOTE 14 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On March 7, 2016, the Company entered into a Restated Credit Agreement, amending its Restated Credit Facility. The Restated Credit Facility provides for the Company’s existing $175.0 million senior secured first lien term loan facility and a new $45.0 million Revolving Credit Facility, which includes a $5.0 million letter of credit subfacility. The Company’s obligations under the Restated Credit Facility are secured by substantially all the assets of the Company (see Note 8 – Long-Term Debt).

NOTE 15 – QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA – UNAUDITED

 

The following presentsis the quarterly financial data for the fiscal periodsyears ended December 31, 20152017 and 2014:2016:

 

 Fiscal Year 2015 
 First  Second  Third  Fourth      2017 
(In thousands, except per share data)  Quarter  

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

  Fiscal Year  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  Year 
             
Tour revenues $55,421 $49,531 $58,561 $46,472 $209,985  $63,128  $55,571  $84,584  $63,221  $266,504 
Gross profit $31,019 $28,045 $33,118 $22,386  $114,568  $30,525  $26,874  $46,104  $27,475  $130,978 
Net income (loss) $6,933 $8,835 $4,416 $(442) $19,742  $625  $(2,578) $9,443  $(15,019) $(7,529)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $0.16 $0.20 $0.10 $(0.01) $0.43  $0.01  $(0.06) $0.20   (0.36) $(0.19)

  2016 
(In thousands, except per share data) First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  Year 
Tour revenues $61,573  $53,871  $70,774  $56,128  $242,346 
Gross profit $36,299  $24,481  $38,328  $24,261  $123,369 
Net income (loss) $10,467  $(4,494) $7,447  $(8,361) $5,059 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $0.23  $(0.10) $0.16  $(0.19) $0.10 

 

  Fiscal Year 2014 
  First  Second  Third  Fourth   
(In thousands, except per share data) Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Quarter  Fiscal Year 
                     
Tour revenues $51,375  $50,791  $51,540  $44,753  $198,459 
Gross profit $29,398  $26,690  $28,946  $23,423  $108,457 
Net income $8,395  $5,164  $7,280  $1,406  $22,245 
Diluted earnings per share $0.16  $0.10  $0.14  $0.03  $0.44 

F-36

F-32