UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON,

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year endedended: December 31, 2017

2020

OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______________to ______________

____________ to 

Commission File Number 001-36832

FINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

No. 001-37986
Delaware47-4219082

INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware47-4219082
(State or Other Jurisdictionother jurisdiction of

Incorporation incorporation or Organization)

organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

2929 Arch Street, Suite 1703, Philadelphia, PA19104No.)
9480 South Dixie Highway Miami, Florida33156
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)

(212) 701-9555

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)


(305) 671-8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each classTrading symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock ($0.0001 par value)
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per shareIMXINasdaq Capital Market 
Warrants, each to purchase one share of Common StockNasdaq Capital Market
Units, each consisting of one share of Common Stock and one- half of one WarrantNasdaq Capital Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes ☐ No ☒


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes ☐ No ☒


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the pastpreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirementrequirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ☒ No ☐


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes☒Yes  ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐ 


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,”company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer☐ Accelerated filer☐ 
Non-accelerated filer☒ Smaller reporting company☐ 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging growth company

☒ 


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes☒Yes  ☐ No 

The


As of June 30, 2020, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting equity securitiesstock held by non-affiliates of the registrant,was $307,492,116 based on the closing sale price of $12.46 of the registrant’s common stock on the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, June 30, 2017, as reported on the Nasdaq Capital Market, was $172,576,239.  

Market.


As of March 14, 2018, there5, 2021, 38,218,156 shares of the registrants common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, were 23,893,333sharesoutstanding. The registrant has no other class of common stock of the registrant issued and outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.


TABLE OF CONTENTS



INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.
INDEX
PART I
Item 1Business1Page
PART I
Item 1.
Item 1A.18
Item 1B.40
Item 2.40
Item 3.40
Item 4.40
PART II
Item 5.41
Item 6.42
Item 7.42
Item 7A.
Item 8.F-1
Item 9.46
Item 9A.46
Item 9B.46
PART III
Item 10.47
Item 11.52
Item 12.53
Item 13.55
Item 14.58
PART IV
Item 15.60
Item 16.

i


GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Unless otherwise provided in this



PART I
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K:

references to “we,” “us,” “company” or “our company” refer to FinTech Acquisition Corp. II;

references to our “sponsor” refer to FinTech Investor Holdings II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company formed for the express purpose of acting as the sponsor of our initial public offering. The managing member of our sponsor is Daniel G. Cohen;

references to “initial holders” or “initial shareholders” are to Daniel G. Cohen, Betsy Z. Cohen, DGC Family FinTech Trust,  Swarthmore Trust of 2016, Shami Patel, Jeremy Kuiper, James J. McEntee, III  and our sponsor, but excludes Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., or Cantor Fitzgerald, the underwriter of our initial public offering, which purchased placement units in our private placement;

references to “founder shares” are to 5,298,333 shares of our common stock issued by us to our initial shareholders, 26,667 of which were forfeited by the initial holders on January 25, 2017 when the underwriter for our initial public offering did not fully exercise its overallotment option;

references to our “initial public offering” means the initial public offering of 17,500,000 of our units, each unit consisting of one share of our common stock and one-half of one warrant, where each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of our common stock,, which was consummated on January 25, 2017.

references to our “management” or our “management team” refer to our officers and certain of our directors;

references to our “public shares” are to shares of our common stock sold as part of the units in our initial public offering (whether they were purchased in the initial public offering or thereafter in the open market);

references to “public stockholders” refer to the holders of our public shares, which may include our initial holders, Cantor Fitzgerald and members of our management team if and to the extent they have purchased public shares, provided that any such holder’s status as a “public stockholder” shall only exist with respect to such public shares;

references to “private placement” refer to the private placement of 420,000 units purchased by our sponsor(390,000 units) and Cantor Fitzgerald (30,000 units), which was consummated simultaneously with the completion of our initial public offering, at a purchase price of $10.00 per unit for a total purchase price of $4.2 million;

references to “placement units” are to the 420,000 units purchased by our sponsor and Cantor Fitzgerald in the private placement, each placement unit consisting of one placement share and one-half of one placement warrant;

references to “placement shares” are to an aggregate of 420,000 shares of our common stock included within the placement units purchased by our sponsor and Cantor Fitzgerald in the private placement;

references to “placement warrants” are to warrants to purchase an aggregate of 210,000 shares of our common stock included within the placement units purchased by our sponsor and Cantor Fitzgerald in the private placement; and

references to “trust account” are to the trust account into which $175,000,000 of the net proceeds of the initial public offering and private placement were deposited for the benefit of the public stockholders.

ii

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Annual Report,10-K may contain certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which reflect our current views with respect to certain events that could have an effect on our future events and financial performance, and any other statements of a future or forward-looking nature, constitute “forward-looking statements” for the purposes of federal securities laws. Our forward-looking statements include,including but are not limited to,without limitation, statements regarding our plans, objectives, financial performance, business strategies, expectations for our business and the business of the Company.

These statements relate to expectations concerning matters that are not historical fact and may include the words or our management’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,phrases such as “would,“believe,“will,“continue,“should,” “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “continues,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “plan,“plans,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,“predicts,“project,“projects,“should,“forecasts,“would”“intends,” “assumes,” “estimates,” “approximately,” “shall,” “our planning assumptions,” “future outlook” and similar expressions, may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statementsExcept for historical information, matters discussed in this Annual Report may include, for example, statements about:

our ability to complete our initial business combination;

our success in retaining or recruiting, or changes required in, our officers, key employees or directors following our initial business combination;

our officers and directors allocating their time to other businesses and potentially having conflicts of interest with our business or in approving our initial business combination;

our potential ability to obtain additional financing to complete our initial business combination;

our pool of prospective target businesses;

failure to maintain the listing on, or the delisting of our securities from, Nasdaq or an inability to have our securities listed on Nasdaq or another national securities exchange following our initial business combination;

the ability of our officers and directors to generate a number of potential investment opportunities;

our public securities’ potential liquidity and trading;

the lack of a market for our securities;

the use of proceeds not held in the trust account or available to us from interest income on the trust account balance; or

our financial performance.

TheForm 10-K are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report are based largely on information currently available to our management and on our current expectations, assumptions, plans, estimates, judgments and beliefs concerning future developmentsprojections about our business and their potential effectsour industry, as well as macroeconomic conditions, and are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those currently anticipated. Although we believe our expectations are based on us. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. These forward-looking statements involvereasonable estimates and assumptions, they are not guarantees of performance and there are a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, (somecontingencies and other factors (many of which are beyondoutside our control) or other assumptions that maycould cause actual results or performance to bediffer materially different from those expressed or implied by thesesuch forward-looking statements. These risksAccordingly, there is no assurance that our expectations will, in fact, occur or that our estimates or assumptions will be correct, and uncertaintieswe caution investors and all others not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those factors described under the headingin Item 1A, “Risk Factors”. Should one in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the following:

changes in applicable laws or moreregulations;
factors relating to our business, operations and financial performance, including:
the COVID-19 pandemic, responses thereto and the economic and market effects thereof, including unemployment levels and increased capital markets volatility;
competition in the markets in which we operate;
volatility in foreign exchange rates that could affect the volume of theseconsumer remittance activity and/or affect our foreign exchange related gains and losses;
cyber-attacks or disruptions to our information technology, computer network systems and data centers;
our ability to maintain agent relationships on terms consistent with those currently in place;
credit risks from our agents and the financial institutions with which we do business;
bank failures, sustained financial illiquidity, or illiquidity at our clearing, cash management or custodial financial institutions;
new technology or competitors that disrupt the current ecosystem by introducing digital platforms;
our ability to satisfy our debt obligations and remain in compliance with our credit facility requirements;
interest rate risk from elimination of the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) as a benchmark interest rate;
our success in developing and introducing new products, services and infrastructure;
customer confidence in our brand and in consumer money transfers generally;
our ability to maintain compliance with the regulatory requirements of the jurisdictions in which we operate or plan to operate;
international political factors or implementation of tariffs, border taxes or restrictions on remittances or transfers of money out of the United States and Canada;
changes in U.S. tax laws;
political instability, currency restrictions and volatility in countries in which we operate or plan to operate;
consumer fraud and other risks relating to customers’ authentication;
weakness in U.S. or international economic conditions;
changes in immigration laws and their enforcement;
our ability to protect our brand and intellectual property rights;
our ability to retain key personnel; and
other economic, business and/or competitive factors, risks and uncertainties, materialize,including those described in the “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as any additional risk factors that may be described in our other filings with the SEC from time to time.
All forward-looking statements that are made or should anyattributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary notice. The forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements.the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
1

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS
Overview
On July 26, 2018, International Money Express, Inc. (formerly a special purpose acquisition company called FinTech Acquisition Corp. II) consummated a merger transaction (the “Merger”) by which it acquired Intermex Holdings II, Inc. (“Intermex”) and its subsidiaries that comprise our operations. In connection with the closing of the Merger, we changed our name to International Money Express, Inc. (the “Company”). Unless the context herein otherwise exceptprovides, the “Company” refers to the combined company following the Merger and, together with their respective subsidiaries, “FinTech” refers to the registrant prior to the closing of the Merger and “Intermex” refers to Intermex Holdings II, Inc. prior to the closing of the Merger. Reference to the Company and its business operations and financial information as it existed pre-Merger refers to Intermex.
We conduct our business primarily through our operating subsidiary, Intermex Wire Transfer, LLC.
Intermex is a rapidly growing and leading money remittance services company focused primarily on the United States to Latin America and the Caribbean (“LAC”) corridor, which includes Mexico, Central and South America and the Caribbean. In 2019, we expanded our services to allow remittances to Africa from the United States and also began offering sending services from Canada to Latin America and Africa. We utilize our proprietary technology to deliver convenient, reliable and value-added services to our customers through a broad network of sending and paying agents. Our remittance services, which include a comprehensive suite of ancillary financial processing solutions and payment services, are available in all 50 states in the U.S., Washington D.C., Puerto Rico and 13 provinces in Canada, where customers can send money to beneficiaries in 17 LAC countries, seven countries in Africa and two countries in Asia. Our services are accessible in person through over 100,000 sending and paying agents and Company-operated stores, as well as online and via Internet-enabled mobile devices. Additionally, we have expanded our product and service portfolio to include online payment options, pre-paid debit cards and direct deposit payroll cards, which may present different cost, demand, regulatory and risk profiles relative to our core remittance business.
Money remittance services to LAC countries, primarily Mexico and Guatemala, are the primary source of our revenue. These services involve the movement of funds on behalf of an originating customer for receipt by a designated beneficiary at a designated receiving location. Our remittances to LAC countries are primarily generated in the United States by customers with roots in Latin American and Caribbean countries, many of whom do not have an existing relationship with a traditional full-service financial institution capable of providing the services we offer. We provide these customers with flexibility and convenience to help them meet their financial needs. We believe many of our customers who use our services may have access to traditional banking services, but prefer to use our services based on reliability, convenience and value. We generate money remittance revenue from fees paid by our customers (i.e., the senders of funds), which we share with our sending agents in the originating country and our paying agents in the destination country. Remittances paid in local currencies that are not pegged to the U.S. dollar also earn revenue through our daily management of currency exchange spreads.
Our money remittance services enable our customers to send funds through our broad network of locations in the United States and Canada that are primarily operated by third-party businesses, as well as through 34 Company-operated stores. Transactions are processed and payments are collected by our agent (“sending agent(s)”) and those funds become available for pickup by the beneficiary at the designated destination, usually within minutes, at any Intermex payer location (“paying agent(s)”). We refer to our sending agents and our paying agents collectively as agents. In addition, our services are offered digitally through Intermexonline.com and via Internet-enabled mobile devices. Since January 2018 through December 31, 2020, we have grown our agent network by approximately 40% and increased our remittance transactions volume by more than 33%. In 2020, we processed approximately 32 million remittances, representing over 12% growth in transactions as compared to 2019.
Our Competitive Strengths
Primary focus on the LAC corridor. Unlike many of our competitors, who we believe prioritize global reach over growth and profitability, we are focused on one or two geographical regions. We believe the LAC corridor provides an attractive operating environment with significant opportunity for future growth. According to latest available data published by the World Bank, the LAC corridor continues to be the most rapidly growing remittance corridor in the world.
Highly scalable, proprietary software platform. We provide our money remittance services utilizing our internally developed proprietary software systems, which we believe enhance the productivity of our network of agents, enabling them to quickly, reliably and cost-effectively process remittance transactions. Our proprietary software systems were designed to incorporate real-time compliance functionality, which improves our regulatory compliance and helps to minimize fraud. We have developed a platform that has the capacity to handle traffic well in excess of the number of transactions we currently process. Our money remittance platform has proven reliable, with our 2020 downtime being less than 0.05%.
Highly selective agent recruitment process designed to identify productive long-term partners. We strategically target agents for our network only after a metric-based analysis of potential productivity and a thorough vetting process. In our agent selection process, we
2

focus on geographic locations that we believe are likely to have high customer volume and demand for our services. By closely monitoring individual agent performance and money remittance trends, we can offer our agents real-time technical support and marketing assistance to help increase their productivity and remittance volume.
Strong relationships with major banks and financial institutions. Our relationships with clearing, check processing, trading and exchange rate and cash management banks are critical to an efficient and reliable remittance network. We benefit from our strong and long-term relationships with a number of large banks and financial institutions. We maintain strong relationships with a number of other national and regional banking and financial institutions in the United States and Latin America. For example, we have maintained a long-term relationship with Wells Fargo, Bank of America and US Bank, among others. Due to increasing regulatory scrutiny of banks and financial institutions, we believe that new banking relationships may be difficult to develop for new, start-up competitors in the industry, hence creating a barrier to entry to new competition and making our existing relationships a competitive advantage.
Powerful brand with strong consumer awareness and loyalty in the LAC corridor. We believe we are a leading money remittance provider from the United States to the LAC corridor, processing 18.5% of the aggregate volume of remittances to Mexico according to the latest available data published by the Central Bank of Mexico in 2020 and 27.1% of the aggregate volume of remittances to Guatemala according to the latest available data published by the Central Bank of Guatemala in 2020. We believe that our customers associate the Intermex brand with reliability, strong customer service and the ability to safely and efficiently remit their funds. The information contained in this paragraph is based on “Revenues by Workers’ Remittances” published in the Central Bank of Mexico’s website and “Income from family remittance” published in the Central Bank of Guatemala’s website.
Strong compliance processes and procedures. We operate in a highly-regulated environment and are reviewed by regulators and external auditors periodically. We maintain a comprehensive and rigorous compliance process with policies, procedures and internal controls designed to exceed current regulatory requirements. Our software also includes embedded compliance systems that provide real-time transaction alerts and Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) screening. Our risk and compliance management tools include programs by Equifax, Experian, LexisNexis and TransUnion, among others.
Experienced and proven management team. Our management team consists of industry veterans with a track record of achieving profitable growth. Our team is led by our Chief Executive Officer, Robert Lisy, with a successful 30-year track record in the retail financial services and electronic payment processing industry.
Our Growth Strategy
We believe we are well positioned to drive continued growth by executing on the following core strategies:
Expand our market share in our largest corridors. The two largest remittance corridors we serve are the United States to Mexico and United States to Guatemala. According to the latest available data in the World Bank Remittance Matrix, the United States to Mexico remittance continues to be one of the largest in the world. We aim to continue to expand our market share in those states where we are currently well-established and poised for continued profitable growth within those markets via targeted regional penetration. We believe that we can leverage our current customer data to increase repeat customer usage, track and effectively recapture one-time users of our service and improve sending agent productivity to drive growth in these states. We are also staging a targeted marketing effort to realize significantly increased market share growth in large states where we are underrepresented.
Expand our services into new corridors. We believe that there is significant room to grow our business in underserved geographic regions in the LAC corridor where there is demand from customers and agents for our value-added approach to money remittances. Specifically, we are targeting future growth opportunities via new corridors from the United States to other non-Spanish speaking regions, including the Caribbean and other continents. In 2019, we expanded our services to allow remittances to Africa from the United States and also began offering sending services from Canada to Latin America and Africa. In 2020, we achieved strong 5.3% and 13.2% growth in remittance volume to our emerging markets of El Salvador and Honduras, respectively, compared to 2019.
Leverage our technology in the business-to-business market. We believe that our money remittance platform has significant excess capacity. We believe we can leverage this capacity to sell business-to-business solutions to third parties, such as banks and major retailers.

Continue to grow online and mobile remittance channels. Our money remittance platform currently enables our customers to send funds from the United States to the LAC corridor and Africa through the Internet via Intermexonline.com and on their Internet-enabled mobile devices. We believe these channels not only expand our potential customer base as digital transaction capabilities become more relevant to LAC consumers but also benefit from secular and demographic trends as consumers continue to migrate to conducting financial transactions online.
3

Segments
Our business is organized around one reportable segment that provides money transmittal services primarily between the U.S. and Canada to Mexico, Guatemala and other countries in Latin America, Africa and Asia through a network of authorized agents located in various unaffiliated retail establishments and 34 Company-operated stores throughout the U.S. and Canada. This is based on the objectives of the business and how our chief operating decision maker, the CEO and President, monitors operating performance and allocates resources.

Operations and Services
Money remittance services to LAC countries, primarily Mexico and Guatemala, are the primary source of our revenue. These services involve the movement of funds on behalf of an originating customer for receipt by a designated beneficiary at a designated receiving location. Our remittances to LAC countries are primarily generated in the United States by customers with roots in Latin American and Caribbean countries, many of whom do not have an existing relationship with a traditional full-service financial institution capable of providing the services we offer. We provide these customers with flexibility and convenience to help them meet their financial needs. We believe many of our customers who use our services may have access to traditional banking services, but prefer to use our services based on reliability, convenience and value. We generate money remittance revenue from fees paid by our customers (i.e., the senders of funds), which we share with our sending agents in the originating country and our paying agents in the destination country. Remittances paid in local currencies that are not pegged to the U.S. dollar also earn revenue through our daily management of currency exchange spreads.
The majority of our money remittance transactions are generated through our agent network of retail locations and Company-operated stores where the transaction is processed and payment is collected by our sending agent. Those funds become available for pickup by the beneficiary at the designated receiving destination, usually within minutes, at any Intermex payer location. In select countries, the designated recipient may also receive the remitted funds via a deposit directly to the recipient’s bank account, mobile phone account or prepaid card. Our locations in the United States and Canada, also referred to as our sending agents, tend to be individual establishments, such as multi-service stores, grocery stores, convenience stores, bodegas and other retail locations. Our payers in LAC countries are referred to as paying agents, and generally consist of large banks and financial institutions or large retail chains. Grupo Elektra, S.A.B. de C.V. (“Elektra”) is our largest paying agent and processes a significant portion of remittances in the LAC corridor. Each of our sending agents and our paying agents are primarily operated by third-party businesses where our money remittance services are offered. Additionally, we operate a small number of retail locations in the United States, which we refer to as Company-operated stores and where our money remittance services are available. We also operate subsidiary payer networks in Mexico under the Pago Express brand and in Guatemala under the Intermex brand. These networks contribute payer locations that reach some of the most remote areas in those countries, providing increased convenience to our customers in the United States, Canada, Mexico and Guatemala.
At our agent sending locations, our customers may initiate a transaction directly with an agent, or through a direct-dialed telephone conversation from our agent location to our call centers. Many of our sending agents operate in locations that are open outside of traditional banking hours, including nights and weekends. Our sending agents understand the markets that they serve and coordinate with our sales and marketing teams to develop business plans for those markets. We hold promotional events for our sending agents to help familiarize them with the Intermex brand and to incent the agents to promote our services to customers.
Our money remittance services are also available on the Internet via Intermexonline.com, enabling customers to send money twenty-four hours a day conveniently from their computer or Internet-enabled mobile device. Those funds can be sent to any of our paying agent locations or to a recipient’s bank account, funding the transaction using debit card, credit card, or through electronic funds transfer processed through the automated clearing house (“ACH”) payment system. Internet-based money transmission services do not comprise a material percentage of the Company’s overall business.
We maintain call centers in Mexico and Guatemala, providing call center services 365 days per year and customer service in both English and Spanish, as well as the possibility of service in many of the regional dialects that our customers speak. Our call centers are able to provide customer service for inbound customer calls and have technology available for direct calls from customers at our agent locations in processing remittance transactions.
Cash Management Bank Relationships
We buy and sell a number of global currencies and maintain a network of settlement accounts to facilitate the timely funding of money remittances and foreign exchange trades. Our relationships with clearing, check processing, trading and exchange rate and cash management banks are critical to an efficient and reliable remittance network. We benefit from our strong and long-term relationships with a number of large banks and financial institutions. We maintain strong relationships with a number of other national and regional banking and financial institutions in the United States, Canada and Latin America. In addition, we have benefited from our 15-year relationship with US Bank, which manages our main operating account, and from strong relationships with Bancomer, Wells Fargo, Bank of America and KeyBank as our primary banks for exchange rate management with respect to the foreign currencies.
4

Information Technology
Currently, all of our money processing software is proprietary and has been developed primarily by our internal software development team. Our money processing software acts as a point of sale for our money remittance transactions and incorporates real-time compliance functionality, which improves our regulatory compliance and helps to minimize fraud. Our money processing software is critical to our operations while our back-office software is critical for settling our transactions.
In addition to our money remittance software, we continue to develop programs and defenses against cyber-attacks. We are fully aligned with the cybersecurity framework, which is a voluntary framework that most companies in the financial services industry follow. We utilize a number of third-party vendors that monitor our systems and inform us of any attempted attacks. Our Chief Information Security Officer delivers an annual report to our board of directors regarding our cybersecurity policies and practices at least once during the fiscal year.
In addition to our proprietary and internally developed software systems, we have analytical data which enables us to analyze market trends, performance of market territories, agents’ performance and consumers’ habits in real time.
We continually invest in our technology platform that has the capacity to handle traffic well in excess of the number of transactions we currently process. A load balancing configuration between tier-1 datacenters, in addition to failover redundancy, provide uptime performance. Our technology platform has experienced limited downtime, with our 2020 downtime being less than 0.05%.
Our Transaction Processing Engine (“TPE”), developed through a combination of databases, web services and applications, allows us to process money remittances reliably and quickly by leveraging a proprietary rules engine to apply granular-level product feature customization. The TPE also leverages real-time risk management algorithms to improve our regulatory compliance and helps to minimize fraud.
Our internally developed and proprietary payer Application Programming Interface platform securely and efficiently integrates our TPE directly with the platforms of our paying agents, so that we can deliver money remittances quickly to our paying agents while optimizing the efficiency/speed of adding new payers to our network and integrating payers’ software and systems with our software and systems.
Intellectual Property
The Intermex brand is critical to our business. In the markets in which we compete, we derive benefit from our brand, as we believe the Intermex brand is recognized for its speed, cost effectiveness and reliability for money remittances throughout the United States, the LAC corridor, Canada and Africa. We use various trademarks and service marks in our business, including, but not limited, to Intermex, International Money Express, CheckDirect and Pago Express, some of which are registered in the United States and other countries. In addition, we rely on trade secret protection to protect certain proprietary rights in our information technology. See the section entitled “Information Technology” for more information.
We rely on a combination of patent, trademark and copyright laws and trade secret protection and invention assignment, confidentiality or license agreements to protect our intellectual property rights in products, services, expertise, and information. We believe the intellectual property rights in processing equipment, computer systems, software and business processes held by us and our subsidiaries provide us with a competitive advantage. We take appropriate measures to protect our intellectual property to the extent such intellectual property can be protected.
Sales and Marketing
The majority of our money remittance transactions are generated through our agent network of retail locations and Company-operated stores where the transaction is processed and payment is collected by our sending agent. Our agent locations include multi-service stores, grocery stores, convenience stores, bodegas and other retail locations. The vast majority of our agents are provided access to our proprietary money remittance software systems, while others have access to our combination telephone and fax/tablet set up, which we call telewire, enabling direct access to our call centers for money remittance services. In all of our independent sending agent locations the agent provides the physical infrastructure and staff required to complete the remittances, while we provide the central operating functions, such as transaction processing, settlement, marketing support, compliance training and support, and customer relationship management. We also maintain 34Company-operated stores in the United States. We retain customer data, which enables us to increase repeat customer usage, track and effectively recapture one-time users of our service and improve sending agent productivity.
We market our services to customers in a number of ways, directly and indirectly through our sending agents and paying agents, promotional activities, traditional media and digital advertising, and our loyalty program, which we call “Interpuntos.” This loyalty program offers customers faster service at our sending agent locations and the ability to earn points with each transaction that are redeemable for rewards, such as reduced transaction fees or more favorable foreign exchange rates.
5

Our Industry
We are a rapidly growing and leading money remittance services company primarily focused on the United States to the LAC corridor. We utilize our proprietary technology to deliver convenient, reliable and value-added services to our customers through a broad network of sending and paying agents. The two largest remittance corridors we serve are United States to Mexico and United States to Guatemala. According to the latest information available from the World Bank Remittance Matrix, the United States to Mexico remittance corridor was the largest in the world in 2020.
Trends in the cross-border money remittance business tend to correlate to immigration trends, global economic opportunity and related employment levels in certain industries such as construction, information, manufacturing, agriculture and certain service industries.
Throughout 2020, Latin American political and economic conditions remained unstable, as evidenced by high unemployment rates in key markets, currency reserves, currency controls, restricted lending activity, weak currencies and low consumer confidence, among other factors, in addition to the effects of the ongoing COVID pandemic. Specifically, continued political and economic unrest in parts of Mexico and some countries in South America contributed to volatility. Our business has generally been resilient during times of economic instability as money remittances are essential to many recipients, with the funds used by the receiving party for their daily needs. However, long-term sustained appreciation of the Mexican Peso or Guatemalan Quetzal as compared to the U.S. Dollar could negatively affect our revenues and profitability.
Another significant trend impacting the money remittance industry is increasing regulation on banks, making it difficult for money remittance companies to have strong banking relationships. Regulations in the United States and elsewhere focus, in part, on cybersecurity and consumer protection. Regulations require money remittance providers, banks and other financial institutions to develop systems to prevent, detect, monitor and report certain transactions.
Government Regulation
As a non-bank financial institution in the United States, we are regulated by the Department of Treasury, the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), the Department of Banking and Finance of the State of Florida and additionally by the various regulatory institutions of those states in which we hold an operating license. We are duly registered as a Money Service Business (“MSB”) with FinCEN, the financial intelligence unit of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. We are also subject to a wide range of regulations in the United States and other countries, including anti-money laundering laws and regulations; financial services regulations; currency control regulations; anti-bribery laws; money transfer and payment instrument licensing laws; escheatment laws; privacy, data protection and information security laws, such as the Graham-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”); and consumer disclosure and consumer protection laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”).

Regulators worldwide are exercising heightened supervision of money remittance providers and requiring increased efforts to ensure compliance. Failure to comply with any applicable laws and regulations could result in restrictions on our ability to provide our products and services, as well as the potential imposition of civil fines and possibly criminal penalties. We continually monitor and enhance our compliance programs in light of the most recent legal and regulatory changes.
Anti-Money Laundering Compliance. Our money remittance services are subject to anti-money laundering laws and regulations of the United States, including the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”), as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, as well as state laws and regulations and the anti-money laundering laws and regulations in many of the countries in which we operate. The countries in which we operate may require one or more of the following:
reporting of large cash transactions and suspicious activity;
transaction screening against government watch-lists, including the watch-list maintained by OFAC;
prohibition of transactions in, to or from certain countries, governments, individuals and entities;
limitations on amounts that may be transferred by a customer or from a jurisdiction at any one time or over specified periods of time, which require aggregation over multiple transactions;
customer information gathering and reporting requirements;
customer disclosure requirements, including language requirements and foreign currency restrictions;
notification requirements as to the identity of contracting agents, governmental approval of contracting agents or requirements and limitations on contract terms with our agents;
6

registration or licensing of us or our agents with a state or federal agency in the United States or with the central bank or other proper authority in a foreign country; and
minimum capital or capital adequacy requirements.
Anti-money laundering regulations are constantly evolving and vary from country to country. We continuously monitor our compliance with anti-money laundering regulations and implement policies and procedures in light of the most current legal requirements. Our money remittance services are primarily offered through third-party agents under contract with us, but we do not directly control these agents. As a MSB, we and our agents are required to establish anti-money laundering compliance programs that include internal policies and controls; a designated compliance officer; employee training and an independent review function. We have developed an anti-money laundering training manual and a program to assist with the education of our agents and employees on the applicable rules and regulations. We also offer in-person and online training as part of our agent compliance training program, engage in various activities to enable agent oversight and have adopted compliance policies that outline key principles of our compliance program to our agents. We have developed a regulatory compliance department, under the direction of our Chief Compliance Officer, whose foremost responsibility is to monitor transactions, detect suspicious activity, maintain financial records and train our employees and agents. An independent third-party consulting firm periodically reviews our policies and procedures to ensure the efficacy of our anti-money laundering and regulatory compliance program. Our key milestones in the compliance process include (1) the entry of the transaction by the sending agent requires completion of mandatory fields and identification requirements, (2) the sender and receiver are screened against government required lists (for OFAC and other purposes), (3) the transaction, before sent to the paying agent, is screened and any flagged exceptions are sent to the compliance unit for investigation and release or rejection and (4) the transaction is screened for limit restrictions, velocity levels, structuring and identification requirements.
In connection with and when required by regulatory requirements we make information available to certain U.S. federal and state, as well as certain foreign, government agencies to assist in the prevention of money laundering, terrorist financing and other illegal activities and pursuant to legal obligations and authorizations. In certain circumstances, we may be required underby government agencies to deny transactions that may be related to persons suspected of money laundering, terrorist financing or other illegal activities, and it is possible that we may inadvertently deny transactions from customers who are making legal money transfers.
Licensing. In most countries, either we or our agents are required to obtain licenses or to register with a government authority in order to offer money transfer services. Almost all states in the United States, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, as well as certain provinces in Canada, require us to be licensed to conduct business within their jurisdictions. Licensing requirements may include requirements related to net worth, providing surety bonds and letters of credit, operational procedures, agent oversight and maintenance of reserves to cover outstanding payment obligations. Acceptable forms of such reserves will vary based on jurisdiction and the applicable regulator, but generally include cash and cash equivalents, U.S. government securities laws.

iii

PART I

Item 1.BUSINESS

Overview

and other highly rated debt instruments. Many regulators require us to file reports on a quarterly or more frequent basis to verify our compliance with their requirements. We are also subject to periodic examinations by the governmental agencies with regulatory authority over our business.

Escheatment. Unclaimed property laws of each state in the United States in which we operate, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico require us to track certain information for all of our money remittances and payment instruments and, if the funds underlying such remittances and instruments are unclaimed at the end of an applicable statutory abandonment period, require us to remit the proceeds of the unclaimed property to the appropriate jurisdiction. Applicable statutory abandonment periods range from three to seven years. Certain foreign jurisdictions also have unclaimed property laws. These laws are evolving and are often unclear and inconsistent among jurisdictions, making compliance challenging. We have an ongoing program designed to comply with escheatment laws as they apply to our business.
Data Privacy and Cybersecurity. We are subject to federal, state and international laws and regulations relating to the collection, use, retention, security, transfer, storage and disposal of personally identifiable information of our customers, agents and employees. In the United States, we are subject to various federal privacy laws, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which requires that financial institutions provide consumers with privacy notices and have in place policies and procedures regarding the safeguarding of personal information. We are also subject to privacy and data breach laws of various states. Outside the United States, we are subject to privacy laws of numerous countries and jurisdictions, which may be more restrictive than the U.S. laws and impose more stringent duties on companies or penalties for non-compliance. Government surveillance laws and data localization laws are evolving to address increased and changing threats and risks and as these laws evolve, they may be, or become, inconsistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
Consumer Protection. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) imposes additional regulatory requirements and creates additional regulatory oversight over us. The Dodd-Frank Act created the CFPB which issues and enforces consumer protection initiatives governing financial products and services, including money remittance services, in the United States through the CFPB’s Remittance Transfer Rule. Its requirements include: a blank check companydisclosure requirement to provide consumers sending funds internationally from the United States enhanced pre-transaction written disclosures, an obligation to resolve certain errors, including errors that may be outside our control, and an obligation to cancel transactions that have not been completed at a customer’s request. As a “larger participant” in the market for international money transfers, we are subject to direct examination and supervision by the CFPB. We
7

have modified our systems and consumer disclosures in light of the requirements of the Remittance Transfer Rule. In addition, under the Dodd-Frank Act, it is unlawful for any provider of consumer financial products or services to engage in unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices. The CFPB has substantial rule making and enforcement authority to prevent unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a financial product or service. In addition, each state of the United States from time to time, may enact new laws and regulations, such as the CCPA, which creates new consumer rights relating to the access to, deletion of, and sharing of personal information that is collected by businesses. We have taken the necessary steps to review, modify and implement, as needed, policies and procedures designed to comply with the CFPB’s Remittance Transfer Rule. The Company’s communications, advertising and sales practices and that of its agent network are subject to regulation by, among other things, state and federal consumer protection laws including the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). The FTC and the Federal Communications Commission have issued regulations under the TCPA that place restrictions on, among other things, unsolicited automated telephone calls or text messages to residential and wireless telephone subscribers by means of automatic telephone dialing systems and the use of prerecorded or artificial voice messages. The Company has taken steps to insulate itself from any such wrongful conduct, including conduct engaged in by its agents, by, among other things, requiring its agents to comply with the TCPA and such regulations.
Anti-Bribery Regulation. We are subject to regulations imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) in the United States and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions. These laws may impose recordkeeping and other requirements on us. We maintain a compliance program designed to comply with anti-bribery laws and regulations applicable to our business.
Risk Management
At times, we are exposed to credit risk related to receivable balances from sending agents in the money remittance process if agents do not timely make payments to us.
Through our online and electronic platforms, we also are exposed to credit risk directly from transactions that are originated through means other than cash, such as credit, debit and “ACH” cards, and therefore are subject to “chargebacks” for insufficient funds or other collection impediments, such as fraud.
Given the nature of our business, we are also subject to liquidity risk as the timing of the funds to be remitted by our sending agents may extend in comparison with the timing when we make the funds available to the money transfer beneficiary in the destination country. Our current liquidity sources as well as our ability to generate free cash are mitigating factors in our liquidity management strategy.
We continually monitor fraud risk, perform credit reviews before adding agents to our network and conduct periodic credit risk analyses of agents and certain other parties that we transact with directly. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, our provision for bad debt was equal to 0.5% of our total revenues.
Seasonality
We do not experience meaningful seasonality in our business. We may experience, however, increased transaction volume around certain holidays, such as Mother’s Day and the December holidays.
Competition
The market for money remittance services is very competitive. Our competitors include a small number of large money remittance providers, financial institutions, banks as well as a large number of small niche money remittance service providers that serve select regions. We compete with larger companies, such as The Western Union Company (“Western Union”), MoneyGram International, Inc. (“MoneyGram”) and Euronet Worldwide Inc. (“Euronet”) and a number of other smaller competitors. We generally compete for money remittance agents on the basis of value, service, quality, technical and operational differences, commission, and marketing efforts. As a philosophy, we sell credible solutions to agents, not discounts or higher commissions as is typical for the industry. We compete for money remittance customers on the basis of trust, convenience, service, efficiency of outlets, value, technology and brand recognition. We believe that our ongoing investments in new products and services will help us to remain competitive in our evolving business environment, given the increasing competition from digital platform providers.
We expect to encounter increasing competition as new technologies emerge that enable customers to send and receive money through a variety of channels, but we do not expect adoption rates to be as significant in the near term for the customer segment we serve. Regardless, we continue to innovate in the industry by differentiating our money remittance business through programs to foster loyalty among agents as well as customers and have expanded our channels through which our services are accessed to include online and mobile offerings in preparation for customer adoption.
8

Human Capital
As of December 31, 2020, we had 262 employees in the United States, of whom 258 are full-time. We also have 449 employees in Mexico, of whom 217 are full-time, and 58 employees in Guatemala, all of whom are full time. As of December 31, 2020, 417 of the employees in Mexico were represented by a labor union.
We recruit employees with the skills and training relevant to functional responsibilities. Depending on the position, our recruitment reach can be national as well as local. New employees receive an orientation on the policies and practices of the Company. Also, they are provided industry-relevant compliance training and are introduced to our Code of Conduct and Ethics.
We invest in our workforce by offering competitive salaries, incentives, and benefits that are determined based on the preferences and needs of our employees. Our incentives are objective-based and we have a strong pay for performance culture that we believe drives superior results. All of our non-sale employees are eligible to participate in our incentive bonus plan, which is based on the achievement of certain personal objectives and our financial results.
During 2020 and due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we made the well-being and health of our employees a top priority. We adjusted standard operating procedures within our business operations to ensure continued worker safety. These procedures included reconfiguring facilities to reduce employee density, expanded and more frequent cleaning within facilities, implementation of appropriate and mandated distancing programs, employee temperature monitoring and requiring use of certain personal protective equipment at our U.S. headquarters and call centers in Mexico and Guatemala.
Available Information
The Company was incorporated as a Delaware corporation inon May 201528, 2015. Our principal executive office is located at 9480 South Dixie Highway, Miami, Florida 33156, and formed forour telephone number at that address is (305) 671-8000. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the purpose“Investor Relations” section of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination, with one or more businesses. We have generated no operating revenues to date, and we do not expect that we will generate operating revenues until we consummate our initial business combination.

We have concentrated our efforts in identifying businesses which provide disruptive technological innovation to the financial services industry, with particular emphasis on businesses that provide data processing; transactional and data security; rewards, loyalty, and consumer engagement platforms by which financial services engage their clients and market and provide services to them; digital marketing; and payment processing services. We have sought to acquire established businesses that we believe are fundamentally sound but potentially in need of financial, operational, strategic or managerial redirection to maximize value.

At December 31, 2017, we had not yet commenced operations. All activity through December 31, 2017 relates to the Company’s formation and its initial public offering, and identifying a target company for our initial business combination.

The registration statement for our initial public offering was declared effective on January 19, 2017. On January 25, 2017, we consummated the initial public offering of 17,500,000 units generating gross proceeds of $175,000,000.  

Simultaneously with the closing of the initial public offering, we consummated the sale of 420,000 placement units at a price of $10.00 per unit in a private placement to our sponsor, FinTech Investors Holding II, LLC, and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., the representative of the underwriters for the initial public offering, generating gross proceeds of $4,200,000.  

Following the closing of the initial public offering on January 25, 2017, an amount of $175,000,000 ($10.00 per unit) from the net proceeds of the sale of the units in the initial public offering and the placement units was placed in a trust account and invested in U.S. government securities, within the meaning set forth in Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940,website, www.intermexonline.com, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), with a maturity of 180 days or less or in any open-ended investment company that holds itself outsoon as a money market fund selected by the Company meeting the conditions of paragraphs (d)(2), (d)(3) and (d)(4) of Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act, as determined by the Company, until the earlier of: (i) the consummation of a business combination, (ii) the redemption of any public shares in connection with a stockholder vote to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete a business combination within 24 months from the consummation of the initial public offering; or (iii) the distribution of the trust account, if wereasonably practical after they are unable to complete a business combination within the combination period or upon any earlier liquidation of us. 

The Merger Agreement

On December 19, 2017, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and among us, FinTech II Merger Sub Inc., a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of us (“Merger Sub 1”), FinTech II Merger Sub 2 LLC, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of us (“Merger Sub 2” and together with Merger Sub 1, the “Merger Subs”), Intermex Holdings II, Inc. (“Intermex”) and SPC Intermex Representative LLC (the “Representative”), which provides for the acquisition of Intermex by us pursuant to the proposed merger of Merger Sub 1 with and into Intermex with Intermex continuing as the initial surviving entity (the “First Merger”), immediately following which the initial surviving entity will be merged (the “Second Merger,” and together with the First Merger, the “Merger”) with and into Merger Sub 2, with Merger Sub 2 continuing as the surviving entity and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of us.


Merger

As a result of the Merger, each outstanding share of Intermex common stock (“Intermex Common Stock”) will convert into the right to receive a combination of cash and shares of our common stock (“Company Common Stock”), as calculated pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement.

Consideration

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the aggregate consideration to be paid by us in the Merger will consist of (i) $92,000,000 in cash ($2,000,000 of which will be placed in escrow at closing as security for working capital adjustments), (ii) approximately $161,000,000 in shares of Company Common Stock, subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement and (iii) an amount (as determined in accordance with the Merger Agreement) equal to any excess cash at Intermex at the time of the closing in the form of cash or additional shares of Company Common Stock, at our option, subject to certain limited exceptions. The cash consideration will be funded from the cash held in our trust account after permitted redemptions.

Redemption Offer

Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and in accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, we will be providing our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem, upon the closing of the Merger, their shares of Company Common Stock for cash equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount on deposit as of two (2) business days prior to the consummation of the Merger in our trust account (which holds the proceeds of our initial public offering, less taxes payable or amounts released to us for working capital purposes in an amount not to exceed $500,000) (the “Redemption Offer”).

Representations, Warranties and Covenants

Each of Intermex, us, and the Merger Subs have made representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement that are customary for transactions of this nature. The representations and warranties of us, the Merger Subs and Intermex will not survive the closing of the Merger.

Conditions to Consummation of the Merger

Consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement is subject to customary conditions of the respective parties, including, among others, that (i) the Merger be approved by our stockholders and Intermex’s stockholder; (ii) there has been no material adverse effect with respect to Intermex or us since the date of the Merger Agreement; (iii) our organizational documents will be amended and restated as described in the Merger Agreement; (iv) the parties will have received certain governmental consents and authorizations to the Merger; (v) all applicable waiting periods and any extensions thereof under applicable antitrust, competition or similar laws will have expired or been terminated; and (vi) we will have at least $125,000,000 in our trust account as of the closing, after giving effect to the redemption of public shares by our public stockholders and the payment of deferred underwriting fees.

Termination

The Merger Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the consummation of the Merger (whether before or after our and Intermex’s required stockholder votes have been obtained) by mutual written consent of us and Intermex and in certain other limited circumstances, including if the Merger has not been consummated by September 19, 2018 (the “end date”); provided that either Intermex or us may extend the end date until December 19, 2018, if necessary to obtain required approvals with respect to certain governmental consents and authorizations, if, at the end date, all of the other conditions to closing are satisfied. If the Merger Agreement is validly terminated, no party thereto will have any liability or any further obligation to any other party under the Merger Agreement, with certain limited exceptions, including liability for any willful breach of the Merger Agreement.


Additional Agreements to be Executed at Closing

The Merger Agreement provides that, upon consummation of the Merger, we will enter into a registration rights agreement and a shareholders agreement.

Registration Rights Agreement

Upon consummation of the Merger, we will enter into a registration rights agreement with certain of our stockholders and certain former stockholders of Intermex with respect to the shares of Company Common Stock currently held or that will be issued as partial consideration under the Merger Agreement, as applicable (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). The Registration Rights Agreement will require us to, among other things, file a resale shelf registration statement on behalf of the stockholders promptly after the closing of the Merger. The Registration Rights Agreement will also provide certain demand rights and piggyback rights to the stockholders, subject to underwriter cutbacks and issuer blackout periods. We will agree to pay certain fees and expenses relating to registrations under the Registration Rights Agreement.

Shareholders Agreement

Upon consummation of the Merger, we will enter into a shareholders agreement with certain former stockholders of Intermex and certain of our existing stockholders (the “Shareholders Agreement”), pursuant to which the former Intermex stockholders will receive certain director nominee designation rights and our stockholders will receive certain board observer rights, and all the stockholders party thereto will agree to vote for the director nominees designated under the agreement. The Intermex stockholders will cease to have any continuing director designation rights under the Shareholders Agreement if their collective ownership of Company Common Stock is at any time less than 5% of the total outstanding Company Common Stock. The Shareholders Agreement also contains certain provisions (including a lock-up provision) intended to maintain, following the consummation of the Merger, our qualification as a “Controlled Company” within the meaning of Rule 5615 of the Nasdaq Corporate Governance Requirements.

Voting Agreement

Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, we, Intermex and certain of our existing stockholders entered into a Voting Agreement (the “Voting Agreement”). Pursuant to the Voting Agreement, the stockholders party thereto have agreed to, among other things, vote all of the shares of Company Common Stock held by such stockholders (i) in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (ii) against any actions that would result in a breach by us of any obligations contained in the Merger Agreement; (iii) in favor of the proposals set forth in our preliminary proxy statement/prospectus (and definitive proxy statement/prospectus, when available) to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) relating to the Merger; and (iv) against alternative proposals or transactions to the Merger.

The Voting Agreement generally prohibits the stockholders party thereto from transferring, or permitting to exist any liens on, their shares of Company Common Stock prior to the consummation of the Merger. The Voting Agreement will automatically terminate upon the first to occur of (i) the closing of the Merger and (ii) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms.

We anticipate structuring our initial business combination to acquire 100% of the equity interest or assets of the target business or businesses. The Merger contemplates the acquisition of 100% of the equity interests of Intermex.


Nasdaq rules require that our initial business combination must be with one or more target businesses that together have a fair market value equal to at least 80% of the balance in the trust account (less any deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payable on interest earned) at the time of our signing a definitive agreement in connection with our initial business combination. The fair market value of the target or targets will be determined by our board of directors based upon one or more standards generally accepted by the financial community, such as discounted cash flow valuation or value of comparable businesses. If our board is not independently able to determine the fair market value of the target business or businesses, we will obtain an opinion with respect to the satisfaction of such criteria from an independent investment banking firm that is a member of FINRA or an independent accounting firm, and reasonably acceptable to Cantor Fitzgerald, as representative of the underwriters. On December 12, 2017, our board received the opinion of BTIG, LLC that the fair market value of Intermex satisfies this Nasdaq requirement.

Business Strategy

We have sought to capitalize on the significant financial services, financial technology and banking experience and contacts of Daniel G. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer and a director, Betsy Z. Cohen, our Chairman of the Board, and James J. McEntee, III, our President and Chief Financial Officer, and our board of directors to identify, evaluate, acquire and operating a financial technology businesses.

Our management team and a majority of our board of directors served as executive officers and/or directors of FinTech I, a former blank check company which raised $100.0 million in its initial public offering in February 2015 and completed its initial business combination in July 2016. We believe that potential sellers of target businesses will view the fact that our management team has successfully closed a business combination with a vehicle similar to our company as a positive factor in considering whether or not to enter into a business combination with us. However, past performance by our management team is not a guarantee of success with respect to any business combination we may consummate.

Mr. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer and a director, Mrs. Cohen, our Chairman of the Board, and Mr. McEntee, our President and Chief Financial Officer, have extensive experience in the financial services industry, generally, and the financial technology industry in particular as well as extensive experience in operating financial services companies in a public company environment.

Mr. Cohen, with over 20 years of experience, is a founder and the Chairman of Bancorp. Mr. Cohen also served as Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of FinTech I until the FinTech I acquisition of FTS Holding Corporation (the “FinTech I Acquisition”(“SEC”). Mr. Cohen is the Vice Chairman and Head of Europe of IFMI (NYSE: IFMI), an investment firm specializing in credit-related fixed income investments, and is an officer and director of subsidiaries of Institutional Financial Markets, including JVB Financial, a registered broker-dealer. He is also a past Chief Executive Officer and trustee of RAIT (NYSE: RAS), a real estate investment trust with approximately $3.9 billion of total assets as of September 30, 2016 focused on commercial mortgage leading, and was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Taberna Realty Finance Trust, a real estate investment trust, until its merger into RAIT. Mr. Cohen was also a past director of Jefferson Bank of Pennsylvania, a commercial bank acquired by Hudson United Bancorp in 1999.

Mrs. Cohen, with over 40 years of experience, is a founder, and from September 2000 through December 2014 served as the Chief Executive Officer of, Bancorp (NASDAQ: TBBK), a financial holding company with approximately $4.22 billion of total assets as of September 30, 2016, whose principal subsidiary is The Bancorp Bank, a bank that provides a wide range of commercial and retail banking products and services to both regional and national markets. Bancorp’s customers access its banking services through its website and obtain cash withdrawals from automated teller machines. Bancorp provides affinity banking services to members and employees of organizations or businesses under the name of and through the website of such organization or business, and has developed extensive systems for processing debit and credit card transactions and providing prepaid, or stored value, card services. Mrs. Cohen also served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of FinTech I until the Fintech I Acquisition and, following the FinTech I Acquisition, continues to serve on the FinTech I board of directors. Mrs. Cohen is also a founder of RAIT, and was its Chairman until December 2010 and its Chief Executive Officer until December 2006. She was also the founder and Chief Executive Officer of JeffBanks, a publicly traded bank holding company, and its subsidiary banks from 1974 until the sale of JeffBanks to Hudson United Bancorp in December 1999.


Mr. McEntee, with over 20 years of experience, is a director of Bancorp and The Bancorp Bank, was previously the Chief Executive Officer of Alesco Financial, an investment firm specializing in credit related fixed income investment, until it merged with Cohen & Company and was the Chief Operating Officer of Cohen & Company. Mr. McEntee also served as the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of FinTech I until the Fintech I Acquisition. In addition, he was a managing director of IFMI and the Vice-Chairman and Co-Chief Operating Officer of JVB Financial.

We have identified the following criteria that were used in evaluating business transaction opportunities:

History of free cash flow generation. We have sought to acquire one or more businesses or assets that have a history of, or potential for, strong, stable free cash flow generation, with predictable and recurring revenue streams.

Revenues and Enterprise Value. We have sought to acquire one or more businesses with annual revenues of approximately $150 million to $750 million and an enterprise value of approximately $500 million to $1.5 billion.

Strong management team. We have sought to acquire one or more businesses or assets that have strong, experienced management teams or those that provide a platform for us to assemble an effective and experienced management team. We have focused on management teams with a proven track record of driving revenue growth, enhancing profitability and creating value for their stockholders.

Opportunities for add-on acquisitions. We have sought to acquire one or more businesses or assets that we can grow both organically and through acquisitions. In addition, we believe that our ability to source proprietary opportunities and execute transactions will help the business we acquire grow through acquisition, and thus serve as a platform for further add-on acquisitions.

Spin-offs/divestitures of non-core businesses or assets from larger companies. We have focused on one or more businesses or assets that are part of larger companies where the owners seek to divest or spin-off such businesses in order to free up capital to focus on core activities.

Defensible business niche. We have sought to acquire on one or more businesses or assets that have a leading or niche market position and that demonstrate advantages when compared to their competitors, which may help to create barriers to entry against new competitors. We anticipate that these barriers to entry will enhance the ability of these businesses or assets to generate strong profitability and free cash flow.

Diversified customer and supplier base. We have sought to acquire one or more businesses or assets that have a diversified customer and supplier base, which are generally better able to endure economic downturns, industry consolidation, changing business preferences and other factors that may negatively impact their customers, suppliers and competitors.

Competitive Strengths

We believe we have the following competitive strengths:

Management Operating and Investing Experience. Our directors and executive officers have significant experience in the financial services and financial technology industries. Daniel G. Cohen, with over 20 years’ experience in the financial services industry, is a founder of Bancorp, the Chairman and Chief Investment Officer of an investment bank and is an officer and director of a broker-dealer subsidiary of the investment bank. Betsy Z. Cohen has over 40 years’ experience in the financial services industry and is a founder of and, until her retirement in December 2014, served as chief executive officer of, The Bancorp, Inc., a financial holding company whose banking subsidiary, The Bancorp Bank, provides banking services principally through the internet. James J. McEntee, III, with over 20 years of experience in the financial services industry, is a director of The Bancorp, Inc. and The Bancorp Bank, was previously the Chief Executive Officer of an investment firm specializing in credit related fixed income investment, a managing director of IFMI and the Vice-Chairman and Co-Chief Operating Officer of JVB Financial. Additionally, each of Mr. Cohen, Mrs. Cohen and Mr. McEntee served as an executive officer and/or director of FinTech I. We believe that this breadth of experience provides us with a competitive advantage in evaluating businesses and acquisition opportunities in our target industry.


Established Deal Sourcing Network. As a result of their extensive experience in the financial services industry, our management team members have developed a broad array of contacts in the industry. We believe that these contacts will be important in generating acquisition opportunities for us.

Strong Financial Position and Flexibility. With a trust account initially in the amount of $175,000,000 and a public market for our common stock, we offer a target business a variety of options to facilitate a future business transaction and fund the growth and expansion of business operations. Because we are able to consummate an initial business transaction using our capital stock, debt, cash or a combination of the foregoing, we have the flexibility to design an acquisition structure to address the needs of the parties. We have not, however, taken any steps to secure third party financing and would only do so simultaneously with the consummation of our initial business transaction. Accordingly, our flexibility in structuring an initial business transaction may be constrained by our ability to arrange third-party financing, if required.

Status as a Public Company. We believe our structure makes us an attractive business transaction partner to prospective target businesses. As an existing public company, we offer a target business an alternative to the traditional initial public offering through a merger or other business transaction with us. In this situation, the owners of the target business would exchange their shares of stock in the target business for shares of our stock. Once public, we believe the target business would have greater access to capital and additional means of creating management incentives that are better aligned with stockholders’ interests than it would as a private company. We believe that being a public company can also augment a company’s profile among potential new customers and vendors and aid it in attracting and retaining talented employees.

Effecting Our Initial Business Combination

General

We intend to effectuate our initial business combination using cash from the proceeds of the initial public offering and the private placement, our capital stock, debt or a combination of these as the consideration to be paid in our initial business combination.

If we pay for our initial business combination using stock or debt securities, or we do not use all of the funds released from the trust account for payment of the purchase price in connection with our business combination or for redemptions or purchases of our common stock, we may apply the balance of the cash released to us from the trust account for general corporate purposes, including for maintenance or expansion of operations of acquired businesses, the payment of principal or interest due on indebtedness incurred in consummating our initial business combination, to fund the purchase of other companies or for working capital.

Nasdaq rules require that our initial business combination be with one or more target businesses that together have a fair market value equal to at least 80% of the balance in the trust account (less any deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payable on interest earned) at the time of our signing a definitive agreement in connection with our initial business combination. However, if our securities are not listed on Nasdaq or another securities exchange, we will no longer be subject to that requirement.

We may seek to raise additional funds through a private offering of debt or equity securities to finance our initial business combination, and we may effectuate an initial business combination using the proceeds of such offering rather than using the amounts held in the trust account. Subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, we would consummate such financing only simultaneously with the consummation of our business combination. In the case of an initial business combination funded with assets other than the trust account assets, our tender offer documents or proxy materials disclosing the business combination would disclose the terms of the financing and, only if required by law or Nasdaq, we would seek stockholder approval of such financing. There are no prohibitions on our ability to raise funds privately or through loans in connection with our initial business combination. At this time, we are not a party to any arrangement or understanding with any third party with respect to raising any additional funds through the sale of securities or otherwise.


Sources of Acquisition Candidates

Target business candidates were brought to our attention from various unaffiliated sources, including investment bankers, attorneys, accountants, venture capital funds, private equity funds, leveraged buyout funds, management buyout funds, brokers and other members of the financial community and corporate executives. These target candidates may present solicited or unsolicited proposals. Such sources became aware that we were seeking a business combination candidate by a variety of means, including publicly available information relating to the initial public offering, public relations and marketing efforts or direct contact by management following the completion of the initial public offering.

Our officers and directors, as well as their affiliates, also brought to our attention target business candidates of which they become aware through their contacts. While we do not presently anticipate engaging the services of professional firms or other individuals that specialize in business acquisitions on any formal basis, we may engage these firms or other individuals in the future, in which event we may pay a finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation to be determined in an arm’s length negotiation based on the terms of the transaction. We will engage a finder only if our management determines that the use of a finder may bring opportunities to us that may not otherwise be available to us or if finders approach us on an unsolicited basis with a potential transaction that our management determines is in our best interest to pursue. Payment of finder’s fees is customarily tied to completion of a transaction, in which case any such fee will be paid out of the funds held in the trust account. In no event, however, will our initial stockholders or any of our existing officers or directors, or any entity with which they are affiliated, be paid any finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation prior to, or for any services they render in order to effectuate, the consummation of our initial business combination (regardless of the type of transaction that it is), other than (i) repayment of loans made to us prior to the date of the initial public offering by our sponsor to cover offering-relating and organization expenses and (ii) repayment of the up to $1,100,000 in incremental loans that our sponsor has committed to make to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended initial business combination (provided that if we do not consummate an initial business combination, we may use working capital held outside the trust account to repay such loaned amounts, but no proceeds from our trust account would be used for such repayment other than interest earned thereon). None of the initial holders, our officers, our directors or any of their respective affiliates will be allowed to receive any compensation, finder’s fees or consulting fees from a prospective acquisition target in connection with a contemplated acquisition of such target by us. Although some of our officers and directors may enter into employment or consulting agreements with the acquired business following our initial business combination, the presence or absence of any such arrangements will not be used as a criterion in our selection process of an acquisition candidate.

We are not prohibited from pursuing an initial business combination with a company that is affiliated with our sponsor, initial holders, officers, directors or their affiliates. Additionally, we are not prohibited from partnering, submitting joint bids, or entering into any similar transaction with such persons in the pursuit of an initial business combination. If we seek to complete an initial business combination with such a company or we partner with such persons in our pursuit of an initial business combination, we, or a committee of independent directors, would obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that is a member of FINRA or an independent accounting firm, and reasonably acceptable to Cantor Fitzgerald, as representative of the underwriters, that such an initial business combination is fair to our stockholders from a financial point of view. Generally, such opinion is rendered to a company’s board of directors and investment banking firms may take the view that stockholders may not rely on the opinion. Such view will not impact our decision on which investment banking firm to hire.

Unless we consummate our initial business combination with an affiliated entity, we are not required to obtain a financial fairness opinion from an independent investment banking firm. If we do not obtain such an opinion, our stockholders will be relying on the judgment of our board of directors, who will determine fair market value and fairness based on standards generally accepted by the financial community. The application of such standards would involve a comparison, from a valuation standpoint, of our business combination target to comparable public companies, as applicable, and a comparison of our contemplated transaction with such business combination target to other then-recently announced comparable private and public company transactions, as applicable. The application of such standards and the basis of our board of directors’ determination will be discussed and disclosed in our tender offer or proxy solicitation materials, as applicable, related to our initial business combination.


Selection of a target business and structuring of our initial business combination

Subject to the Nasdaq requirement that our initial business combination must be with one or more target businesses that together have a fair market value equal to at least 80% of the balance in the trust account (less any deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payable on interest earned) at the time of our signing a definitive agreement in connection with our initial business combination, our management had virtually unrestricted flexibility in identifying and selecting one or more prospective target businesses, although we are not permitted to effectuate our initial business combination with another blank check company or a similar company with nominal operations. However, if our securities are not listed on Nasdaq or another securities exchange, we will no longer be subject to the Nasdaq requirement. In any case, we intend to consummate our initial business combination only if we (or any entity that is a successor to us in a business combination) will acquire a majority of the outstanding voting securities or assets of the target with the objective of making sure that we are not required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. We have sought to acquire established companies that have demonstrated sound historical financial performance. Although we are not restricted from doing so, we do not intend to acquire start-up companies. To the extent we effect a business combination with a company or business that may be financially unstable or in its early stages of development or growth, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in such company or business. Although our management has evaluated the risks inherent in a particular target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risk factors.

In evaluating a prospective target business, and in evaluating Intermex in particular, we conducted an extensive due diligence review which encompassed, among other things, meetings with incumbent management and employees, document reviews, interviews of customers and suppliers, inspection of facilities, as well as a review of financial and other information made available to us.

The time required to select and evaluate a target business and to structure and complete our initial business combination, and the costs associated with this process, are not currently ascertainable with any degree of certainty. Any costs incurred with respect to the identification and evaluation of a prospective target business with which a business combination is not ultimately completed will result in our incurring losses and will reduce the funds we can use to complete another business combination. We will not pay any finders or consulting fees to members of our management team, or any of their respective affiliates, for services rendered to or in connection with a business combination.

We intend to hold a special meeting of our stockholders to approve the Merger and related proposals. Assuming all conditions to closing are met or otherwise waived, we expect to consummate the Merger in the second quarter of 2018. However, there are no assurances that the Merger will close by such time or at all.

Lack of business diversification

For an indefinite period of time after consummation of our initial business combination, the prospects for our success may depend entirely on the future performance of a single business. Unlike other entities that have the resources to complete business combinations with multiple entities in one or several industries, it is probable that we will not have the resources to diversify our operations and mitigate the risks of being in a single line of business. By consummating a business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may:

subject us to negative economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact on the particular industry in which we operate after our initial business combination, and

cause us to depend on the marketing and sale of a single product or limited number of products or services.


Limited ability to evaluate the target’s management team

Although we closely scrutinize the management of a prospective target business when evaluating a target business, our assessment of the target business’ management may not prove to be correct. In addition, the future management may not have the necessary skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company. The future role of members of our management team, if any, in the target business cannot presently be stated with any certainty. While it is possible that one or more of our directors will remain associated in some capacity with us following a business combination, it is unlikely that any of them will devote their full efforts to our affairs subsequent to a business combination. Moreover, we cannot assure you that members of our management team will have experience or knowledge relating to the operations of the particular target business.

We cannot assure you that any of our key personnel will remain in senior management or advisory positions with the combined company. The determination as to whether any of our key personnel will remain with the combined company will be made at the time of our initial business combination. If the Merger is consummated, all of our current officers and directors will resign and will not serve the combined company.

Following a business combination, we may seek to recruit additional managers to supplement the incumbent management of the target business. We cannot assure you that we will have the ability to recruit additional managers, or that additional managers will have the requisite skills, knowledge or experience necessary to enhance the incumbent management.

Stockholders may not have the ability to approve a business combination

We may not seek stockholder approval before we effect our initial business combination as not all business combinations require stockholder approval under applicable state law. However, we will seek stockholder approval if it is required by law or Nasdaq, or we may decide to seek stockholder approval for business or other reasons. We intend to hold a special meeting of our stockholders to approve the Merger and related proposals. Presented in the table below is a table of the types of initial business combinations we may consider and whether stockholder approval is currently required under Delaware law for each such transaction.

Type of Transaction

Whether
Stockholder
Approval is
Required

Purchase of assetsNo
Purchase of stock of target not involving a merger with the companyNo
Merger of target into a subsidiary of the companyNo
Merger of the company with a targetYes

Permitted purchases of our securities

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our initial holders, directors, officers or their respective affiliates may purchase shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions either prior to or following the consummation of our initial business combination, although as of the date of this Annual Report they have no commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions. If they do effect such purchases, we anticipate that they would approach a limited number of large holders of our securities that have voted against the business combination or sought redemption of their shares, or that have indicated an intention to do so, and engage in direct negotiations for the purchase of such holders’ positions. All holders approached in this manner would be institutional or sophisticated holders. There is no limit on the number of shares they may acquire. Our initial holders, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates will not make any such purchases when they are in possession of any material nonpublic information not disclosed to the seller or during a restricted period under Regulation M under the Exchange Act or in transactions that would violate Section 9(a)(2) or Rule 10(b)-5 under the Exchange Act. Although they do not currently anticipate paying any premium purchase price for such public shares, there is no limit on the price they may pay. They may also enter into transactions to provide such holders with incentives to acquire shares or vote their shares in favor of an initial business combination. We will notify stockholders of such material purchases or arrangements that would affect the vote on an initial business combination, if any, by press release, filing a Form 8-K or by means of a supplement to our proxy statement. No funds in the trust account may be used to effect purchases of shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.


The purpose of such purchases would be to (i) increase the likelihood of obtaining stockholder approval of the business combination or (ii) to satisfy a closing condition in an agreement with a target that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash at the closing of the business combination, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise not be met. This may result in the consummation of a business combination that may not otherwise have been possible.

As a consequence of any such purchases by our initial stockholders, directors, officers or their affiliates, the public “float” of our common stock may be reduced and the number of beneficial holders of our securities may be reduced, which may make it difficult to obtain the continued listing of our securities on Nasdaq or another national securities exchange in connection with our initial business combination

Our initial stockholders, officers, directors and/or their respective affiliates anticipate that they will identify the public stockholders with whom they may pursue privately negotiated purchases through either direct contact by the public stockholders or by our receipt of redemption requests or votes against the business combination submitted by such public stockholders following our mailing of proxy materials in connection with our initial business combination. The sellers of any shares so purchased by our initial stockholders, officers, advisors, directors and/or their affiliates would, as part of the sale arrangement, revoke their election to redeem such shares and withdraw their vote against the business combination. The terms of such purchases would operate to facilitate our ability to consummate a proposed business combination by potentially reducing the number of shares redeemed for cash.

Redemption rights for public stockholders upon consummation of our initial business combination

We will provide our stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their shares upon the consummation of our initial business combination at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including any amounts representing deferred underwriting commissions and interest earned on the trust account, less any interest released to us for working capital purposes or the payment of taxes, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, subject to the limitations described herein. The initial holders and Cantor Fitzgerald have each agreed with respect to their founder shares and placement shares, and in the case of the initial holders, any public shares held by them, to waive their respective redemption rights in connection with the consummation of our initial business combination.

Manner of Conducting Redemptions

We will provide our stockholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their public shares upon the completion of our initial business combination either in connection with a stockholder meeting called to approve the business combination or by means of a tender offer. The decision as to whether we will seek stockholder approval of a proposed business combination or conduct a tender offer will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would require us to seek stockholder approval under the law or stock exchange listing requirement. We intend to conduct redemptions without a stockholder vote pursuant to the tender offer rules of the SEC unless stockholder approval is required by law or by a Nasdaq listing requirement or we choose to seek stockholder approval for business or other legal reasons.

If a stockholder vote is not required and we do not decide to hold a stockholder vote for business or other legal reasons, we will, pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation:

conduct the redemptions pursuant to Rule 13e-4 and Regulation 14E of the Exchange Act, which regulate issuer tender offers, and any limitations (including but not limited to cash requirements) agreed to in connection with the negotiation of terms of the proposed business combination, and

file tender offer documents with the SEC prior to consummating our initial business combination that will contain substantially the same financial and other information about the initial business combination and the redemption rights as is required under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, which regulates the solicitation of proxies.


If we conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, our offer to redeem must remain open for at least 20 business days, in accordance with Rule 14e-1(a) under the Exchange Act, and we will not be permitted to consummate our initial business combination until the expiration of the tender offer period.

In connection with the consummation of our business combination, we may redeem pursuant to a tender offer up to that number of shares of common stock that would permit us to maintain net tangible assets of $5,000,001. However, the redemption threshold may be further limited by the terms and conditions of our proposed initial business combination. For example, the proposed business combination may require: (i) cash consideration to be paid to the target or members of its management team, (ii) cash to be transferred to the target for working capital or other general corporate purposes or (iii) the allocation of cash to satisfy other conditions in accordance with the terms of the proposed business combination. If the aggregate cash consideration we would be required to pay for all shares of common stock that are validly tendered plus the amount of any cash payments required pursuant to the terms of the proposed business combination exceeds the aggregate amount of cash available to us, taking into consideration the requirement that we maintain net tangible assets of at least $5,000,001 or such greater amount depending on the terms of our potential business combination, we will not consummate the business combination, we will not purchase any shares of common stock pursuant to the tender offer and any shares of common stock tendered pursuant to the tender offer will be returned to the holders thereof following the expiration of the tender offer.

When we conduct a tender offer to redeem our public shares upon consummation of our initial business combination, in order to comply with the tender offer rules, the offer will be made to all of our stockholders, not just our public stockholders. In connection with any such tender offer, holders of founder shares have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to their founder shares, placement shares and public shares and Cantor Fitzgerald has agreed to waive its redemption rights with respect to its placement shares.

If, however, stockholder approval of the transaction is required by law or Nasdaq, or we decide to obtain stockholder approval for business or other reasons, we will:

conduct the redemptions in conjunction with a proxy solicitation pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, which regulates the solicitation of proxies, and not pursuant to the tender offer rules, and

file proxy materials with the SEC.

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, we will distribute proxy materials and, in connection therewith, provide our public stockholders with the redemption rights described above upon consummation of the initial business combination.

If we seek stockholder approval, we will consummate our initial business combination only if a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock voted are voted in favor of the business combination. Our sponsor and the other initial holders have agreed to vote their founder shares and placement shares and any public shares held by them in favor of our initial business combination. Additionally, each public stockholder may elect to redeem its public shares, irrespective of whether it votes for or against the proposed transaction, for cash equal to its pro rata share of the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest but less interest released to us for working capital purposes, to pay taxes or dissolution costs and subject to certain volume limitations, as described below. In addition, holders of founder shares have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to their founder shares, placement shares and public shares, and Cantor Fitzgerald has agreed to waive its redemption rights with respect to its placement shares, in connection with the consummation of a business combination.


Many blank check companies would not be able to consummate a business combination if the holders of the company’s public shares voted against a proposed business combination and elected to redeem or convert more than a specified maximum percentage of the shares sold in such company’s initial public offering, which percentage threshold has typically been between 19.99% and 39.99%. As a result, many blank check companies have been unable to complete business combinations because the number of shares voted, against their initial business combination by their public stockholders electing conversion exceeded the maximum conversion threshold pursuant to which such company could proceed with a business combination. Since we have no such specified maximum redemption threshold and since even those public stockholders who vote in favor of our initial business combination will have the right to redeem their public shares, our structure is different in this respect from the structure that has been used by many blank check companies. This may make it easier for us to consummate our initial business combination. However, in no event will we redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 upon consummation of our initial business combination. Moreover, the redemption threshold may be further limited by the terms and conditions of our initial business combination. If the amount of redemptions plus any cash required by our initial business combination would cause our net tangible assets to fall below $5,000,001, we would not proceed with the redemption of our public shares and the related business combination, and instead may search for an alternate business combination. The Merger Agreement requires that, unless waived by Intermex, the amount in our trust account at closing, after giving effect to the redemption of public shares, shall be no less than $125,000,000.

Limitation on redemption upon consummation of a business combination if we seek stockholder approval

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that a public stockholder, together with any affiliate of such stockholder or any other person with whom such stockholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from seeking redemption rights with respect to excess shares. We believe this restriction will discourage stockholders from accumulating large blocks of shares, and subsequent attempts by such holders to use their ability to exercise their redemption rights as a means to force us or our management to purchase their shares at a significant premium to the then-current market price or on other undesirable terms. Absent this provision, a public stockholder holding an aggregate of 20.0% or more of the shares sold in the initial public offering could threaten to exercise its redemption rights if such holder’s shares are not purchased by us or our management at a premium to the then-current market price or on other undesirable terms. By limiting our stockholders’ ability to redeem no more than 20.0% (less one share) of the shares sold in the initial public offering, we believe we will limit the ability of a small number of stockholders to unreasonably attempt to block our ability to consummate our initial business combination, particularly in connection with a business combination with a target that requires as a closing condition that we have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash.

Tendering stock certificates in connection with redemption rights

If we hold a stockholder meeting to approve a potential business combination, we may require our public stockholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights, whether they are record holders or hold their shares in “street name,” to either tender their certificates to our transfer agent up to two business days prior to the meeting date or to deliver their shares to the transfer agent electronically using Depository Trust Company’s DWAC (Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian) System, at the holder’s option. The proxy materials that we will furnish to holders of our public shares in connection with our initial business combination will indicate whether we are requiring public stockholders to satisfy such delivery requirements. Accordingly, a public stockholder would have until two days prior to the vote on the business combination to tender its shares if it wishes to seek to exercise its redemption rights. Given the relatively short exercise period, it is advisable for stockholders to use electronic delivery of their public shares.

There is a nominal cost associated with the above-referenced tendering process and the act of certificating the shares or delivering them through the DWAC System. The transfer agent will typically charge the tendering broker $45.00 and it would be up to the broker whether or not to pass this cost on to the redeeming holder. However, this fee would be incurred regardless of whether or not we require holders seeking to exercise redemption rights to tender their shares. The need to deliver shares is a requirement of exercising redemption rights regardless of the timing of when such delivery must be effectuated.


The foregoing is different from the procedures used by many blank check companies. In order to perfect redemption rights in connection with their business combinations, many blank check companies would distribute proxy materials for the stockholders’ vote on an initial business combination, and a holder could simply vote against a proposed business combination and check a box on the proxy card indicating such holder was seeking to exercise his redemption rights. After the business combination was approved, the company would contact such stockholder to arrange for him to deliver his certificate to verify ownership. As a result, the stockholder then had an “option window” after the consummation of the business combination during which he could monitor the price of the company’s stock in the market. If the price rose above the redemption price, he could sell his shares in the open market before actually delivering his shares to the company for cancellation. As a result, the redemption rights, to which stockholders were aware they needed to commit before the stockholder meeting, would become “option” rights surviving past the consummation of the business combination until the redeeming holder delivered its certificate. The requirement for physical or electronic delivery prior to the meeting ensures that a redeeming holder’s election to redeem is irrevocable once the business combination is approved.

Any request to redeem such shares, once made, may be withdrawn at any time up to the date set forth in the tender offer materials or the date of the stockholder meeting set forth in our proxy materials, as applicable. Furthermore, if a holder of a public share delivers its certificate in connection with an election of redemption rights and subsequently decides prior to the applicable date not to elect to exercise such rights, such holder may simply request that the transfer agent return the certificate (physically or electronically). It is anticipated that the funds to be distributed to holders of our public shares electing to redeem their shares will be distributed promptly after the completion of a business combination.

If the initial business combination is not approved or completed for any reason, then our public stockholders who elected to exercise their redemption rights would not be entitled to redeem their shares for the applicable pro rata share of the trust account. In such case, we will promptly return any certificates delivered by public holders who elected to redeem their shares.

If the Merger is not consummated, we may continue to try to consummate a business combination with a different target until January 25, 2019.

Redemption of public shares and liquidation if no initial business combination

Holders of founder shares, and our officers and directors, have agreed that we have only until January 25, 2019 to complete our initial business combination. If we are unable to consummate our initial business combination by January 25, 2019, we will distribute the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, pro rata to our public shareholders by way of redemption and cease all operations except for the purposes of winding up of our affairs, as further described herein. If we have not consummated a business combination by January 25, 2019, or earlier, at the discretion of our board pursuant to the expiration of a tender offer conducted in connection with a failed business combination, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem all public shares then outstanding at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including any amounts representing interest earned on the trust account, less any interest released to us for working capital purposes, the payment of taxes or dissolution expenses, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law.


The initial holders and Cantor Fitzgerald have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to their founder shares and placement shares (i) in connection with the consummation of a business combination, (ii) in connection with a stockholder vote to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination by January 25, 2019 and (iii) if we fail to consummate a business combination or if we liquidate prior to January 25, 2019. The initial holders have also agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to public shares in connection with the consummation of a business combination and in connection with a stockholder vote to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination by January 25, 2019. However, if the initial holders of, or any of our officers, directors or affiliates acquires public shares, they will be entitled to redemption rights with respect to such public shares if we fail to consummate our initial business combination or liquidate within the required time period. In addition, Cantor Fitzgerald will have the same redemption rights as a public stockholder with respect to any public shares it acquires. Cantor Fitzgerald has informed us that it has no current commitments, plans or intentions to acquire any public shares for its own account; however, if Cantor Fitzgerald does acquire public shares, it will do so in the ordinary course of its business or in the types of transaction. Cantor Fitzgerald will not make any such purchases when it is in possession of any material nonpublic information not disclosed to the seller, during a restricted period under Regulation M under the Exchange Act, in transactions that would violate Section 9(a)(2) or Rule 10(b)-5 under the Exchange Act, or if prohibited by applicable state securities laws or broker-dealer regulations. There will be no redemption rights or liquidating distributions from us with respect to our founder shares, placement units or warrants if we do not consummate a business combination by January 25, 2019.

Our initial holders, executive officers and directors have agreed, pursuant to a written agreement with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that would affect the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination by January 25, 2019 unless we provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their shares of common stock upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us for working capital purposes or to pay our franchise and income taxes, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares. However, we may not redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we are not subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules).

We expect that all costs and expenses associated with implementing our plan of dissolution, as well as payments to any creditors, will be funded from the net proceeds from the initial public offering and the private placement held out of trust, interest income on the balance of the trust account (net of any taxes payable), of which up to $500,000 will be released to us to fund our working capital requirements, and loans from our sponsor for working capital purposes and to pay expenses to identify an initial business combination to a maximum of $1,100,000, although we cannot assure you that there will be sufficient funds for such purposes. If such funds are insufficient, Daniel G. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer and a director and the managing member of our sponsor, has agreed to pay the balance of the amount necessary to complete such liquidation (currently anticipated to be no more than approximately $30,000) and has agreed not to seek repayment for such amounts.

The proceeds deposited in the trust account could become subject to the claims of our creditors which would have higher priority than the claims of our public stockholders. We cannot assure you that the actual per-share redemption amount received by stockholders will not be less than the $10.00 per public share initially on deposit in the trust account. Under Section 281(b) of the DGCL, our plan of dissolution must provide for all claims against us to be paid in full or make provision for payments to be made in full, as applicable, if there are sufficient assets. These claims must be paid or provided for before we make any distribution of our remaining assets to our stockholders. While we intend to pay such amounts, if any, we cannot assure you that we will have funds sufficient to pay or provide for all creditors’ claims.


Although we will seek to have all vendors, service providers, prospective target businesses or other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the trust account for the benefit of our public stockholders, there is no guarantee that they will execute such agreements or even if they execute such agreements that they would be prevented from bringing claims against the trust account including but not limited to fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver, in each case in order to gain an advantage with respect to a claim against our assets, including the funds held in the trust account. If any third party refuses to execute an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held in the trust account, our management will perform an analysis of the alternatives available to it and will only enter into an agreement with a third party that has not executed a waiver if management believes that such third party’s engagement would be significantly more beneficial to us than any alternative. If we do not obtain a waiver from a third party, we will obtain the written consent of our sponsor before our entering into an agreement with such third party. Examples of possible instances where we may engage a third party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third party consultant whose particular expertise or skills are believed by management to be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver and where our sponsor executes a written consent. In addition, there is no guarantee that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the trust account for any reason. In order to protect the amounts held in the trust account, pursuant to a written agreement, Daniel G. Cohen has agreed that he will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a vendor for services rendered or products sold to us, or a prospective target business with which we have discussed entering into a definitive transaction agreement, reduce the amounts in the trust account to below $10.00 per share, except as to any claims by a third party who executed a waiver of rights to seek access to the trust account and except as to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of the initial public offering against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. In the event that an executed waiver is deemed to be unenforceable against a third party, Mr. Cohen will not be responsible to the extent of any liability for such third party claims. We cannot assure you, however, that Mr. Cohen will be able to satisfy those obligations.

If the proceeds in the trust account are reduced below $10.00 per public share and Mr. Cohen asserts that he is unable to satisfy any applicable obligations or that he has no indemnification obligations related to a particular claim, our independent directors would determine whether to take legal action against Mr. Cohen to enforce his indemnification obligations. While we currently expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf against Mr. Cohen to enforce his indemnification obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their business judgment may choose not to do so in a particular instance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that due to claims of creditors the actual value of the per-share redemption price will not be less than $10.00 per public share.

We will have access to the net proceeds from the initial public offering and the private placement held out of trust, any amounts representing interest earned on the trust account, less any interest to pay our franchise and income taxes, up to $500,000 for working capital purposes and up to $100,000 for dissolution expenses, and the commitment of our sponsor to loan us up to $1,100,000 with which to pay any such potential claims (including costs and expenses incurred in connection with our liquidation). If we liquidate and it is subsequently determined that the reserve for claims and liabilities is insufficient, stockholders who received funds from our trust account could be liable for claims made by creditors.

Under the DGCL, stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against a corporation to the extent of distributions received by them in a dissolution. The pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares if we do not consummate our initial business combination by January 25, 2019 may be considered a liquidation distribution under Delaware law. If the corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in Section 280 of the DGCL intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision for all claims against it, including a 60-day notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought against the corporation, a 90-day period during which the corporation may reject any claims brought, and an additional 150-day waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution.

Furthermore, if the pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares in the event we do not consummate our initial business combination by January 25, 2019 is not considered a liquidation distribution under Delaware law and such redemption distribution is deemed to be unlawful, then pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL, the statute of limitations for claims of creditors could then be six years after the unlawful redemption distribution, instead of three years, as in the case of a liquidation distribution. If we have not consummated a business combination by January 25, 2019, or earlier at the discretion of our board, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem all public shares then outstanding at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including any amounts representing interest earned on the trust account, less any interest released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes, up to $500,000 for working capital purposes and up to $100,000 to pay dissolution expenses, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. Accordingly, it is our intention to redeem our public shares as soon as reasonably possible following January 25, 2019 and, therefore, we do not intend to comply with those procedures. As such, our stockholders could potentially be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received by them (but no more) and any liability of our stockholders may extend well beyond the third anniversary of such date.


Because we will not be complying with Section 280, Section 281(b) of the DGCL requires us to adopt a plan, based on facts known to us at such time that will provide for our payment of all existing and pending claims or claims that may be potentially brought against us within the subsequent 10 years. However, because we are a blank check company, rather than an operating company, and our operations are limited to searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from our vendors (such as lawyers, investment bankers, etc.) or prospective target businesses. As described above, pursuant to the obligation contained in our underwriting agreement, we have sought to have all vendors, service providers, prospective target businesses or other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the trust account. As a result of this obligation and Mr. Cohen’s indemnification of the trust account against certain claims as previously described in this section, we believe that the claims that could be made against us will be significantly limited and that the likelihood that any claim would result in any liability extending to the trust account is remote.

If we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of our stockholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, we cannot assure you we will be able to return $10.00 per share to our public stockholders. Additionally, if we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy court could seek to recover all amounts received by our stockholders. Furthermore, our board may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, and thereby exposing itself and our company to claims of punitive damages, by paying public stockholders from the trust account prior to addressing the claims of creditors.

We cannot assure you that claims will not be brought against us for these reasons.

Our public stockholders will be entitled to receive funds from the trust account only (i) in the event of the redemption of our public shares if we do not consummate a business combination by January 25, 2019, (ii) in connection with a stockholder vote to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination by January 25, 2019 or (iii) if they redeem their respective shares for cash upon the consummation of the initial business combination. Also, our management may cease to pursue a business combination prior to January 25, 2019 (our board of directors may determine to liquidate the trust account prior to such expiration if it determines, in its business judgment, that it is improbable within the remaining time to identify an attractive business combination or satisfy regulatory and other business and legal requirements to consummate a business combination). In no other circumstances will a stockholder have any right or interest of any kind to or in the trust account. In the event we seek stockholder approval in connection with our initial business combination, a stockholder’s voting in connection with the business combination alone will not result in a stockholder’s redeeming its shares for an applicable pro rata share of the trust account. Such stockholder must have also exercised its redemption rights as described above.

Competition

In identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business for a business combination, we encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including other blank check companies, private equity groups and leveraged buyout funds and operating businesses seeking strategic acquisitions. Many of these entities are well established and have extensive experience identifying and effecting business combinations directly or through affiliates. Moreover, many of these competitors possess greater financial, technical, human and other resources than us. Our ability to acquire larger target businesses will be limited by our available financial resources. This inherent limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of a target business. Furthermore, our obligation to pay cash to our public stockholders who exercise their redemption rights will reduce the resources available to us for an initial business combination. In addition, the number of our outstanding warrants, and the future dilution they potentially represent, may not be viewed favorably by certain target businesses.


Facilities

We currently maintain our executive offices at 2929 Arch Street, Suite 1703, Philadelphia, PA 19104-2870. The cost for this space is being borne by an affiliate of our sponsor, without cost to us.

We consider our current office space adequate for our current operations.

Employees

We currently have two executive officers. These individuals are not obligated to devote any specific number of hours to our affairs but they devote as much of their time as they deem necessary to our affairs until we have completed our initial business combination. The amount of time they devote in any time period varies based on whether a target business has been selected for our initial business combination and the stage of the business combination process we are in. We do not intend to have any full time employees prior to the consummation of our initial business combination.

Periodic Reporting and Financial Information

We have registered our units, common stock and warrants under the Exchange Act and have reporting obligations, including the requirement that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with the SEC. In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, our annual reports contain consolidated financial statements audited and reported on by our independent registered public accountants. The public may read and copy materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information about the operations of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site thata website, www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that filefiled electronically with the SEC by the Company. In addition, you may automatically receive email alerts and other information when you enroll your email address by visiting the “Investor Relations” section of our website. The content of any website referred to in this document is not incorporated by reference into this document.

9

ITEM 1A.     RISK FACTORS
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our securities involves certain risks. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks that may have a material and adverse effect on the Company, and the risks described herein are not listed in order of the potential occurrence or severity. There is no assurance that we have identified, assessed and appropriately addressed all risks affecting our business operations. Additional risks and uncertainties could adversely affect our business and our results. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, consolidated financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected, and the market price for our shares could decline. Further, to the extent that any of the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitutes forward-looking statements, the risk factors set forth below are cautionary statements, identifying important factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. There can also be no assurance that the actual future results, performance, benefits or achievements that we expect from our strategies, systems, initiatives or products will occur.
Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry
Our financial condition, results of operations, business and cash flow may be negatively affected by a public health crises, such as the recent coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
We may face risks related to health epidemics and pandemics or other outbreaks of communicable diseases such as the global COVID-19 pandemic. The global spread of COVID-19 has created significant volatility, uncertainty and economic disruption, including significant volatility in the capital markets. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic affects our business, operations, financial results and the trading price of our common stock depends on numerous evolving factors that we may not be able to accurately predict, including: the duration and scope and possible resurgence of the pandemic; governmental and business actions that have been and continue to be taken in response to the pandemic (including mitigation efforts such as stay at http://www.sec.gov.

home and other social distancing orders) and the impact of the pandemic on economic activity and actions taken in response (including stimulus efforts such as the Families First Coronavirus Act and the CARES Act).

A public health epidemic or pandemic, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, can have a material adverse effect on the demand for our money remittance services to the extent it impacts the markets in which we operate, and poses the risk that we or our employees, network of agents and consumers and their beneficiaries may be prevented from conducting business activities for an indefinite period of time, including due to shutdowns requested or mandated by governmental authorities, or that such epidemic may otherwise interrupt or impair business activities. Since the pandemic began, we have been subject, on a limited basis, to such shutdowns. We have adjusted standard operating procedures within our business operations to ensure the continued safety of our workers, continue to take further actions to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on our business, and are continually monitoring evolving health guidelines, as well as market conditions, and responding to changes as appropriate.
Adjustments to our operating procedures as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic only had a limited effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020, however, we will continue to monitor this evolving pandemic and its potential effects on the Company’s operations. The Company and our sending agents are considered essential businesses under current federal guidance, however, the Company’s business is dependent upon the willingness and ability of its employees, network of agents and consumers to conduct money transfer services and the ultimate effects of the economic disruption caused by the pandemic and responses thereto. The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our results of operations and financial condition is dependent on future developments, including the duration of the pandemic and the related extent of its severity, as well as its impact on the economic conditions, particularly the level of unemployment of our customers, which remain uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time. If the global response to contain the COVID-19 pandemic is unsuccessful, or if governmental decisions to ease pandemic related restrictions are ineffective, premature or counterproductive, the Company could experience a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, to protect our workers, we are utilizing work from home measures. There is no guarantee that the data security and privacy safeguards we have put in place will be completely effective or that we will not encounter some of the common risks associated with employees accessing Company data and systems remotely.
If we lose key sending agents, our business with key sending agents is reduced or we are unable to maintain our sending agent network under terms consistent with those currently in place, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Most of our revenue is earned through our sending agent network. Sending agents are the persons who generate our customers and provide them with our money remittance services. If sending agents decide to leave our network, our revenue and profits could be adversely affected. The loss of sending agents may occur for a number of reasons, including competition from other money remittance
10

providers, a sending agent’s dissatisfaction with its relationship with us or the revenue earned from the relationship, or a sending agent’s unwillingness or inability to comply with our standards or legal requirements, including those related to compliance with anti-money laundering regulations, anti-fraud measures or agent monitoring. Sending agents also may generate fewer transactions or reduce locations for reasons unrelated to our relationship with them, including increased competition in their business, general economic conditions, regulatory costs or other reasons. In addition, larger sending agents may demand additional financial concessions, which could increase competitive pressure.
We face intense competition, and if we are unable to continue to compete effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The markets in which we operate are highly competitive, and we face a variety of competitors across our businesses, some of which have larger and more established customer bases and substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources than we have. We compete in a concentrated industry, with a small number of large competitors and a large number of small, niche competitors, including consumer money remittance companies, banks, card associations, web-based services, payment processors, informal remittance systems and others. We believe our services are differentiated by features and functionalities, including trust, convenience, service, efficiency of outlets, value, technology and brand recognition. Distribution channels and digital platforms such as online, account based and mobile solutions continue to evolve and impact the competitive environment for money remittances.
Our future growth depends on our ability to compete effectively. For example, if our services do not offer competitive features and functionalities, we may lose customers to our competitors, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we fail to price our services appropriately relative to our competitors, consumers may not use our services, which could adversely affect our business and financial results. For example, transaction volume where we face intense competition could be adversely affected by increasing pricing pressures between our money remittance services and those of some of our competitors, which could reduce margins and adversely affect our financial results. We have historically implemented and may continue implementing price adjustments from time to time in response to competition and other factors. If we reduce prices in order to mitigate the actions of competitors, such reductions could adversely affect our financial results in the short term and may also adversely affect our financial results in the long term if transaction volumes do not increase sufficiently or we do not implement other pricing strategies.
If customer confidence in our business or in consumer money remittance providers generally deteriorates, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our business is built on customer confidence in our brand and our ability to provide convenient, reliable and value-added money remittance services. Erosion in customer confidence in our business, or in consumer money remittance service providers as a means to transfer money more generally, could adversely impact transaction volumes which would in turn adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A number of factors could adversely affect customer confidence in our business, or in consumer money remittance providers more generally, many of which are beyond our control, and could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. These factors include:
the quality of our services and our customer experience, and our ability to meet evolving customer needs and preferences;
failure of our agents to deliver services in accordance with our requirements;
reputational concerns resulting from actual or perceived events, including those related to fraud, consumer protection, money laundering, corruption or other matters;
changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations, or regulator or judicial interpretation thereof, that have the effect of making it more difficult or less desirable to transfer money using consumer money remittance service providers, including additional customer due diligence, identification, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements;
actions by federal, state or foreign regulators that interfere with our ability to remit customers’ money reliably; for example, attempts to seize money remittance funds, imposition of tariffs or limits on our ability to, or that prohibit us from, remitting money in the corridors in which we operate;
federal, state or foreign legal requirements, including those that require us to provide customer or transaction data, and other requirements or to a greater extent than is currently required;
any interruption or downtime in our systems, including those caused by fire, natural disaster, power loss, telecommunications failure, terrorism, vendor failure, unauthorized entry and computer viruses or disruptions in our workforce; and
11

any attack or breach of our computer systems or other data storage facilities resulting in a compromise of personal data.
A significant portion of our customers are migrants. Consumer advocacy groups or governmental agencies could consider migrants to be disadvantaged and entitled to protection, enhanced consumer disclosure, or other different treatment. If consumer advocacy groups are able to generate widespread support for actions that are detrimental to our business, then our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our profit margins may be adversely affected by expansion into new geographic or product markets, which we may enter by acquisition or otherwise, that do not have the same profitability as our core markets.
Although expansion of our business into new geographic or product markets may increase our aggregate revenues, such new geographic or product markets may be more expensive to operate in and may require us to receive lower payment per wire or remittance than that which we currently experience in our core geographic markets of Mexico and Guatemala or other more established product markets due to, among other things:
increased compliance and regulatory costs requiring us to dedicate more expense, time and resources to comply with such regulatory requirements;
potentially higher operational expenses, such as higher agent fees, taxes, fees, technology costs, support costs or other charges and expense associated with engaging in the money transfer business in different jurisdictions or as a result of new product offerings;
reduced pricing models due to more intense competition with entities that may have more experience and resources as well as more established relationships with relevant customers, regulators and industry participants;
potentially reduced demand for remittance services; and
difficulty building and maintaining a network of sending and paying agents in a particular geographic area or with respect to a particular product offering.
We process remittances to Africa and Asia from the United States and also recently began offering sending services from Canada to Latin America and Africa. Additionally, we have expanded our product and service portfolio to include online payment options, pre-paid debit cards and direct deposit payroll cards, which may present different cost, demand, regulatory and risk profiles relative to our core remittance business. If we are unable to capitalize on these markets, or if we spend significant time and resources on expansion plans that fail or are delayed, our business will be adversely affected. Even if we are successful, we will be exposed to additional risks in these markets that we do not face in the United States or in our core remittance business, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current and proposed data privacy and cybersecurity laws and regulations could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to requirements relating to data privacy and cybersecurity under U.S. federal, state and foreign laws. For example, in the U.S. the FTC routinely investigates the privacy practices of companies and has commenced enforcement actions against many, resulting in multi-million dollar settlements and multi-year agreements governing the settling companies’ privacy practices. If we are unable to meet such requirements, we may be subject to significant fines or penalties. Furthermore, certain industry groups require us to adhere to privacy requirements in addition to federal, state and foreign laws, and certain of our business relationships depend upon our compliance with these requirements.
As the number of jurisdictions enacting privacy and related laws increases and the scope of these laws and enforcement efforts expands, we will increasingly become subject to new and varying requirements. For example, California enacted the CCPA, which became effective in January 2020. The CCPA requires covered companies to provide California consumers with new disclosures and expands the rights afforded to consumers regarding their data. The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, the CCPA and similar laws may limit the use and adoption of our products and services and/or require us to incur substantial compliance costs, which could have an adverse impact on our business. Failure to comply with existing or future data privacy and cybersecurity laws, regulations and requirements, including by reason of inadvertent disclosure of personal information, could result in significant adverse consequences, including reputational harm, civil litigation, regulatory enforcement, costs of remediation, increased expenses for security systems and personnel, harm to our consumers and harm to our agents.
In addition, in connection with regulatory requirements to assist in the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing and pursuant to legal obligations and authorizations, we make information available to certain U.S. federal and state, as well as certain foreign, government agencies. In recent years, we have experienced increasing data sharing requests by these agencies, particularly in connection with efforts to prevent terrorist financing or reduce the risk of identity theft. During the same period, there has also been increased public
12

attention to the corporate use and disclosure of personal information, accompanied by legislation and regulations intended to strengthen data protection, information security and consumer privacy. These regulatory goals may conflict, and the law in these areas is not consistent or settled. While we believe that we are compliant with our regulatory responsibilities, the legal, political and business environments in these areas are rapidly changing, and subsequent legislation, regulation, litigation, court rulings or other events could expose us to increased program costs, liability and reputational damage that could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our current risk management and compliance systems may not be able to exhaustively assess or mitigate all risks to which we are exposed from a transaction monitoring perspective.
We are engaged in ongoing efforts to enhance our risk management and compliance policies, procedures and systems to assure compliance with anti-money laundering laws and economic sanctions regulations. We have implemented, and are continuing to implement, policies, procedures and systems designed to address these laws and regulations, including monitoring on an automated and manual basis, the transactions processed through our systems and restricting business involving certain countries. However, the implementation of such policies, procedures and systems may be subject to human error. Further, we may be exposed to fraud or other misconduct committed by our employees, or other third parties, including but not limited to our customers and agents, or other events that are out of our control. Additionally, our risk management policies, procedures and systems are based upon our experience in the industry, and may not be adequate or effective in managing our future risk exposures or protecting us against unidentified or unanticipated risks, which could be significantly greater than those indicated by our past experience. As a result, we can offer no assurances that these policies, procedures and systems will be adequate to detect or prevent money laundering activity or OFAC violations. If any of these policies, procedures or systems do not operate properly, or are disabled, or are subject to intentional manipulation or inadvertent human error, we could suffer financial loss, a disruption of our business, regulatory intervention or reputational damage.
Our services might be used for illegal or improper purposes, such as consumer fraud or money laundering, which could expose us to additional liability.
Our services remain susceptible to potentially illegal or improper uses as criminals are using increasingly sophisticated methods to engage in illegal activities involving internet services and payment services, such as identity theft, fraud and paper instrument counterfeiting. As we make more of our services available online and via Internet-enabled mobile devices, we subject ourselves to new types of consumer fraud risk because requirements relating to consumer authentication are more complex with internet services and such other technologies. Additionally, it is possible that our agents could engage in fraud against consumers. We use a variety of tools to protect against fraud; however, these tools may not always be successful. Allegations of fraud may result in fines, settlements, litigation expenses and reputational damage.
Other illegal or improper uses of our services may include money laundering, terrorist financing, drug trafficking, human trafficking, illegal online gaming, romance and other online scams, illegal sexually-oriented services, prohibited sales of pharmaceuticals, fraudulent sale of goods or services, piracy of software, movies, music and other copyrighted or trademarked goods, unauthorized uses of credit and debit cards or bank accounts and similar misconduct. Users of our services also may encourage, promote, facilitate or instruct others to engage in illegal activities. If the measures we have taken are too restrictive and inadvertently screen proper transactions, this could diminish our customer experience which could harm our business. There is no assurance that the measures we have taken to detect and reduce the risk of this kind of conduct will stop all illegal or improper uses of our services. Our business could be harmed if customers use our system for illegal or improper purposes.
A breach of security in the systems on which we rely could adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on a variety of technologies to provide security for our systems. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments, including improper acts by third parties, may result in a compromise or breach of the security measures we use to protect our systems. We obtain, transmit and store confidential consumer, employer and agent information in connection with some of our services. These activities are subject to laws and regulations in the United States and other jurisdictions. The requirements imposed by these laws and regulations, which often differ materially among the many jurisdictions, are designed to protect the privacy of personal information and to prevent that information from being inappropriately disclosed. Any security breaches in our computer networks, databases or facilities could lead to the inappropriate use or disclosure of personal information, which could harm our business and reputation, adversely affect consumers’ confidence in our or our agents’ business, result in inquiries and fines or penalties from regulatory or governmental authorities, cause a loss of consumers, damage our reputation and subject us to lawsuits and subject us to potential financial losses. In addition, we may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against these security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by these breaches. Our agents and third-party independent contractors may also experience security breaches involving the storage and transmission of our data as well as the ability to initiate unauthorized transactions. If users gain improper access to our, our agents’ or our third-party independent contractors’ computer networks or databases, they may be able to steal, publish, delete or modify confidential customer information or generate unauthorized money remittances. Such a breach could expose us to
13

monetary liability, losses and legal proceedings, lead to reputational harm, cause a disruption in our operations, or make our consumers and agents less confident in our services.
Our business is particularly dependent on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our information technology, computer network systems and data centers. Disruptions to these systems and data centers could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to provide reliable services largely depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer network systems and data centers. Our business involves the movement of large sums of money and the management of data necessary to do so. The success of our business particularly depends upon the efficient and error-free handling of transactions and data. We rely on the ability of our employees and our internal systems and procedures to process these transactions in an efficient, uninterrupted and error-free manner.
In the event of a breakdown, catastrophic event (such as fire, natural disaster, power loss, telecommunications failure or physical break-in), security breach, computer virus, improper operation, improper action by our employees, agents, consumers, financial institutions or third-party vendors or any other event impacting our systems or processes or our agents’ or vendors’ systems or processes, we could suffer financial loss, loss of consumers, regulatory sanctions, lawsuits and damage to our reputation or consumers’ confidence in our business. The measures we have enacted, such as the implementation of disaster recovery plans and redundant computer systems, may not be successful. We may also experience problems other than system failures, including software defects, development delays and installation difficulties, which would harm our business and reputation and expose us to potential liability and increased operating expenses. In addition, any work stoppages or other labor actions by employees who support our systems or perform any of our major functions could adversely affect our business.
In addition, our ability to continue to provide our services to a growing number of agents and consumers in a growing number of countries, as well as to enhance our existing services and offer new services across new distribution platforms, is dependent on our information technology systems. If we are unable to effectively manage the technology associated with our business, we could experience increased costs, reductions in system availability and loss of agents or consumers.
Weakness in economic conditions, in both the U.S. and international markets, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are subject to business cycles and other outside factors that may negatively affect our business.
Our money remittance business relies in part on the overall strength of economic conditions. Consumer money remittance transactions are affected by, among other things, employment opportunities and overall economic conditions. Additionally, consumers tend to be employed in industries such as construction, information, manufacturing, agriculture and certain service industries that tend to be cyclical and more significantly impacted by weak economic conditions than other industries. This may result in reduced job opportunities for our customers in the United States or other countries that are important to our business, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, increases in employment opportunities may lag other elements of any economic recovery.
If general market conditions in the United States or other countries important to our business were to deteriorate, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted. Our agents may have reduced sales or business as a result of weak economic conditions. As a result, our agents may reduce their number of locations, hours of operation, or cease doing business altogether. If our consumer transactions decline due to deteriorating economic conditions, we may be unable to timely and effectively reduce our operating costs or take other actions in response, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, economic or political instability, wars, civil unrest, terrorism and natural disasters may make money transfers to, from or within a particular country more difficult. The inability to timely complete money transfers could adversely affect our business.
If we fail to successfully develop and timely introduce new and enhanced services or if we make substantial investments in an unsuccessful new service or infrastructure change, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our future growth will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to develop and successfully introduce new and enhanced methods of providing money remittance services that keep pace with competitive introductions, technological changes, and the demands and preferences of our agents, consumers and the financial institutions with which we conduct our business. Distribution channels such as online, account based, and mobile solutions continue to evolve and impact the competitive environment for money remittances. If alternative payment mechanisms become widely accepted as substitutes for our current services, and we do not develop and offer similar alternative payment mechanisms successfully and on a timely basis, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. We may make future acquisitions and investments or enter into strategic alliances to develop new technologies and services or to implement infrastructure changes to further our strategic objectives, strengthen our existing businesses and remain competitive. Such acquisitions, investments and strategic alliances, however, are inherently risky, and we cannot guarantee that such investments or strategic alliances will be successful.
14

A significant percentage of our banking relationships are concentrated in a few banks.
A substantial portion of the transactions that we conduct with and through banks are concentrated in a few banks, notably Wells Fargo, Bank of America and US Bank. Because of the current concentration of our major banking relationships, if we lose such a banking relationship, which could be the result of many factors including, but not limited to, changes in regulation, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
A significant portion of our paying agents are concentrated in a few large banks and financial institutions or large retail chains.
A substantial portion of our paying agents are concentrated in a few large banks and financial institutions and large retail chains. Because of the current concentration, if we lose an institution as a paying agent, which could be the result of many factors including, but not limited to, changes in regulation, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Elektra, our largest paying agent by volume, accounted for approximately 18% of Intermex’s total remittance volume in fiscal year 2020. The loss of Elektra as one of our paying agents could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
Major bank failure or sustained financial market illiquidity, or illiquidity at our clearing, cash management and custodial financial institutions, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face certain risks in the event of a sustained deterioration of domestic or international financial market liquidity, as well as in the event of sustained deterioration in the liquidity, or failure, of our clearing, cash management and custodial financial institutions. In particular:
We may be unable to access funds in our deposit accounts and clearing accounts on a timely basis to pay money remittances and make related settlements to agents. Any resulting need to access other sources of liquidity or short-term borrowing would increase our costs. Any delay or inability to pay money remittances or make related settlements with our agents could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In the event of a major bank failure, we could face major risks to the recovery of our bank deposits used for the purpose of settling with our agents. A substantial portion of our cash and cash equivalents held at U.S. banks are not subject to federal deposit insurance protection against loss as they exceed the federal deposit insurance limit. Similarly, we hold cash and cash equivalents at foreign banks, which may not enjoy benefits such as the United States’ federal deposit insurance protection.
We may be unable to borrow from financial institutions or institutional investors on favorable terms, or at all, which could adversely impact our ability to pursue our growth strategy and fund key strategic initiatives.
If financial liquidity deteriorates, there can be no assurance we will not experience an adverse effect, which may be material, on our ability to access capital or contingent liquidity sources.
Changes in banking industry regulation and practice could make it more difficult for us and our sending agents to maintain depository accounts with banks, which would harm our business.
The banking industry, in light of increased regulatory oversight, is continually examining its business relationships with companies that offer money remittance services and with retail agents that collect and remit cash collected from end consumers. Certain major national and international banks have withdrawn from providing service to money remittance services businesses. Should our existing relationship banks decide to not offer depository services to companies engaged in processing money remittance transactions, or to retail agents that collect and remit cash from end customers, our ability to complete money remittances, and to administer and collect fees from money remittance transactions, could be adversely affected.
Our regulatory status and the regulatory status of our agents as MSBs could affect our ability to offer our services. We also rely on bank accounts to provide our payment services. We and some of our agents may in the future have difficulty establishing or maintaining banking relationships due to the banks’ policies, including policies with respect to anti-money laundering. If we or a significant number of our agents are unable to maintain existing or establish new banking relationships, or if we or these agents face higher fees and other costs to maintain or establish new bank accounts, our ability and the ability of our agents to continue to offer our services may be adversely impacted.
We face credit risks from our sending agents and financial institutions with which we do business.
The majority of our business is conducted through independent sending agents that provide our services to consumers at their business locations. Our sending agents receive the proceeds from the sale of our money remittances, and we must then collect these funds from the sending agents. If a sending agent becomes insolvent, files for bankruptcy, commits fraud or otherwise fails to remit money remittance proceeds to us, we must nonetheless complete the money remittance on behalf of the consumer.
15

We monitor the creditworthiness of our sending agents and the financial institutions with which we do business on an ongoing basis. There can be no assurance that the models and approaches we use to assess and monitor the creditworthiness of our sending agents and these financial institutions will be sufficiently predictive, and we may be unable to detect and take steps to timely mitigate an increased credit risk.
In the event of a sending agent bankruptcy, we would generally be in the position of creditor, possibly with limited security or financial guarantees of performance, and we would therefore be at risk of a reduced recovery. We are not insured against credit losses, except in circumstances of agent theft or fraud. Significant credit losses could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Retaining our chief executive officer and other key executives and finding and retaining qualified personnel is important to our continued success, and any inability to attract and retain such personnel could harm our operations.
Our ability to successfully operate our business will depend upon the efforts of certain key personnel. The development and implementation of our strategy has depended in large part on our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Robert Lisy. The retention of Mr. Lisy is important to our continued success, and we expect him to remain with the Company for the foreseeable future.
In addition to Mr. Lisy, we have a number of key executives who have a significant impact on our business. The unexpected loss of key personnel may adversely affect the operations and profitability of the Company. Our success also depends to a large extent upon our ability to attract and retain key employees. Qualified individuals with experience in our industry are in high demand. Our IT personnel have designed and implemented key portions of our proprietary software and are crucial to the success of our business. In addition, legal or enforcement actions against compliance and other personnel in the money remittance industry may affect our ability to attract and retain key employees and directors. The lack of management continuity or the loss of one or more members of our executive management team could harm our business and future development. A failure to attract and retain key personnel including operating, marketing, financial and technical personnel, could also have a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We and our agents are subject to numerous U.S. and international laws and regulations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in material settlements, fines or penalties and reputational harm, and changes in these laws or regulations could result in increased operating costs or reduced demand for our services, all of which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in a highly regulated environment, and our business is subject to a wide range of laws and regulations that vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We are also subject to oversight by various governmental agencies, both in the United States and abroad. Lawmakers and regulators in the United States in particular have increased their focus on the regulation of the financial services industry. New or modified regulations and increased oversight may have unforeseen or unintended adverse effects on the financial services industry, which could affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The money transfer business is subject to a variety of regulations aimed at preventing money laundering and terrorism. We are subject to U.S. federal anti-money laundering laws, including the BSA and the requirements of the U.S. Treasury Department’s OFAC, which prohibit us from transmitting money to specified countries or to or from prohibited individuals. Additionally, we are subject to anti-money laundering laws in the other countries in which we operate. We are also subject to financial services regulations, money transfer licensing regulations, consumer protection laws, currency control regulations, escheat laws, privacy and data protection laws and anti-bribery laws. Many of these laws are constantly evolving, unclear and inconsistent across various jurisdictions, making compliance challenging. Subsequent legislation, regulation, litigation, court rulings or other events could expose us to increased program costs, liability and reputational damage.
As a MSB, we are subject to reporting, recordkeeping and anti-money laundering provisions in the United States as well as many other jurisdictions. In the past few years there have been significant regulatory reviews and actions taken by U.S. and other regulators and law enforcement agencies against banks, MSBs and other financial institutions related to money laundering, and the trend appears to be greater scrutiny by regulators of potential money laundering activity through financial institutions. We are also subject to regulatory oversight and enforcement by FinCEN. Any determination that we have violated the anti-money-laundering laws could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Dodd-Frank Act increases the regulation and oversight of the financial services industry. The Dodd-Frank Act requires enforcement by various governmental agencies, including the CFPB. We could be subject to fines or other penalties if we are found to have violated the Dodd-Frank Act’s prohibition against unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices. The CFPB’s authority to change regulations adopted in the past by other regulators could increase our compliance costs and litigation exposure. Our litigation exposure may also be increased by the CFPB’s authority to limit or ban pre-dispute arbitration clauses. We may also be liable for failure of our agents to comply with the Dodd-Frank Act. The legislation and implementation of regulations associated with the Dodd-Frank Act have increased our costs of compliance and required changes in the way we and our agents conduct business. In addition, we are subject to
16

periodic examination by the CFPB. These examinations may require us to change the way we conduct business or increase the costs of compliance.
In addition, we are subject to escheatment laws in the United States and certain foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct business. We are subject to the laws of various states in the United States which from time to time take inconsistent or conflicting positions regarding the requirements to escheat property to a particular state, making compliance challenging. In some instances, we escheat items to states pursuant to statutory requirements and then subsequently pay those items to consumers. For such amounts, we must file claims for reimbursement from the states.
Any violation by us of the laws and regulations set forth above could lead to significant settlements, fines or penalties and could limit our ability to conduct business in some jurisdictions. Our systems, employees and processes may not be sufficient to detect and prevent violations of the laws and regulations set forth above by our agents, which could also lead to us being subject to significant settlements, fines or penalties. In addition to these fines and penalties, a failure by us or our agents to comply with applicable laws and regulations also could seriously damage our reputation, result in diminished revenue and profit and increase our operating costs and could result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses or registrations, loss of approved status, termination of contracts with banks or retail representatives, administrative enforcement actions and fines, class action lawsuits, cease and desist or consent orders and civil and criminal liability. The occurrence of one or more of these events could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In certain cases, regulations may provide administrative discretion regarding enforcement. As a result, regulations may be applied inconsistently across the industry, which could result in additional costs for us that may not be required to be incurred by our competitors. If we were required to maintain a price higher than most of our competitors to reflect our regulatory costs, this could harm our ability to compete effectively, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, changes in laws, regulations or other industry practices and standards, or interpretations of legal or regulatory requirements, may reduce the market for or value of our services or render our services less profitable or obsolete. Changes in the laws affecting the kinds of entities that are permitted to act as money remittance agents (such as changes in requirements for capitalization or ownership) could adversely affect our ability to distribute our services and the cost of providing such services. Many of our sending agents are in the check cashing industry. Any regulatory action that negatively impacts check cashers could also cause this portion of our agent base to decline. If onerous regulatory requirements were imposed on our agents, the requirements could lead to a loss of agents, which, in turn, could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Regulators around the world compare approaches to the regulation of the payments and other industries. Consequently, a development in any one country, state or region may influence regulatory approaches in other jurisdictions. Similarly, new laws and regulations in a country, state or region involving one service may cause lawmakers there to extend the regulations to another service. As a result, the risks created by any new laws or regulations are magnified by the potential that they may be replicated, affecting our business in another market or involving another service. Conversely, if widely varying regulations come into existence worldwide, we may have difficulty adjusting our services, fees, foreign exchange spreads and other important aspects of our business, with the same effect.
Litigation or investigations involving us or our agents could result in material settlements, fines or penalties.
We have been, and in the future may be, subject to allegations and complaints that individuals or entities have used our money remittance services for fraud-induced money transfers, as well as certain money laundering activities, which may result in fines, penalties, judgments, settlements and litigation expenses. We also are the subject from time to time of litigation related to our business.
Regulatory and judicial proceedings and potential adverse developments in connection with ongoing litigation may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. There also may be adverse publicity associated with lawsuits and investigations that could decrease agent and consumer acceptance of our services. Additionally, our business has been in the past, and may be in the future, the subject of class action lawsuits, regulatory actions and investigations and other general litigation. The outcome of class action lawsuits, regulatory actions and investigations and other litigation is difficult to assess or quantify but may include substantial fines and expenses, as well as the revocation of required licenses or registrations or the loss of approved status, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations or consumers’ confidence in our business. Plaintiffs or regulatory agencies in these lawsuits, actions or investigations may seek recovery of very large or indeterminate amounts, and the magnitude of these actions may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. The cost to defend or settle future lawsuits or investigations may be significant. In addition, improper activities, lawsuits or investigations involving our agents may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations or reputation even if we are not directly involved.
We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or other similar anti-corruption laws.
Our operations around the world, particularly in LAC countries and Africa are subject to anti-corruption laws and regulations, including restrictions imposed by the U.S. FCPA. The FCPA and similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials or employees of commercial enterprises for
17

the purpose of obtaining or retaining business, a business advantage or a governmental approval. We operate in parts of the world that are perceived as having higher incidence of corruption and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-corruption laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Because of the scope and nature of our operations, we experience a higher risk associated with compliance with the FCPA and similar anti-corruption laws than many other companies.
Our employees and agents interact with government officials on our behalf, including as necessary to obtain licenses and other regulatory approvals necessary to operate our business, employ expatriates and resolve tax disputes. We also have a number of contracts with third-party paying agents that are owned or controlled by non-U.S. governments. These interactions and contracts create a risk of payments or offers of payments by one of our employees or agents that could be in violation of the FCPA or other similar anti-corruption laws. Under the FCPA and other similar anti-corruption laws, we may be held liable for actions taken by our employees or agents.
In recent years, there have been significant regulatory reviews and actions taken by the United States and other governments related to anti-corruption laws, and the trend appears to be greater scrutiny on payments to, and relationships with, foreign entities and individuals.
There can be no assurance that all of our employees and agents will abide by the policies and procedures we have implemented to promote compliance with local laws and regulations as well as U.S. laws and regulations, including FCPA and similar anti-corruption laws. If we are found to be liable for violations of the FCPA or similar anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions, either due to our own or others’ acts or inadvertence, we could suffer, among other consequences, substantial civil and criminal penalties, including fines, incarceration, prohibitions or limitations on the conduct of our business, the loss of our financing facilities and significant reputational damage, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our results of business, financial condition or results of operations.
Government or regulatory investigations into potential violations of the FCPA or other similar anti-corruption laws by U.S. agencies or other governments could also have a material and adverse effect on our results of business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, detecting, investigating and resolving actual or alleged violations of the FCPA and other similar anti-corruption laws is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management.
We conduct money remittance transactions through agents in regions that are politically volatile or, in a limited number of cases, may be subject to certain OFAC restrictions.
We conduct money remittance transactions through agents in regions that are politically volatile or, in a limited number of cases, may be subject to certain OFAC restrictions. It is possible that our money remittance services or other services could be used in contravention of applicable law or regulations. Such circumstances could result in increased compliance costs, regulatory inquiries, suspension or revocation of required licenses or registrations, seizure or forfeiture of assets and the imposition of civil and criminal fines and penalties. In addition to monetary fines or penalties that we could incur, we could be subject to reputational harm that could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
New business initiatives, such as modifications to our current product offerings or the introduction of new products, may modify our risk profile from a regulatory perspective.
A number of our recent and planned business initiatives and expansions of existing businesses may bring us into contact, directly or indirectly, with information, individuals and entities that are not within our traditional customer and agent network and that could expose us to new or enhanced regulatory scrutiny. For example, we are starting to offer services across new distribution platforms, which could expose us to increased anti-money laundering, anti-terrorist financing and consumer protection regulations and compliance requirements. Any change in our risk profile stemming from this or any of our other business initiatives could result in increased compliance costs and litigation exposure, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in U.S. tax laws could adversely affect our results of operations.
Changes in tax legislation by U.S. federal, state and local governments could impact our effective tax rates. If statutory tax rates are increased, our results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Our business and results of operations may be adversely affected by foreign political, economic and social instability risks, foreign currency restrictions and devaluation, and various local laws associated with doing business primarily in LAC countries.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from our money remittance transactions from the United States to the LAC corridor, particularly Mexico and Guatemala, and we are exposed to certain political, economic and other uncertainties not encountered in U.S. operations. LAC countries, in particular, have historically experienced uneven periods of economic growth, as well as recession, periods of high inflation and general economic and political instability. Additionally, as events in the LAC region have demonstrated, negative economic or political developments in one country in the region can lead to or exacerbate economic or political instability elsewhere in the region. Consequently, actions or events in LAC countries that are beyond our control could restrict our ability to operate there or otherwise adversely affect the profitability of those operations. Furthermore, changes in the business, regulatory or political climate in any of those
18

countries, or significant fluctuations in currency exchange rates, could affect our ability to expand or continue our operations there, which could have a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we began offering remittances to Africa during 2019 and are now exposed to new political, economic and other uncertainties as a result of this geographic expansion, any of which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The countries in which we operate may impose or tighten foreign currency exchange control restrictions, taxes or limitations with regard to repatriation of earnings and investments from these countries. If exchange control restrictions, taxes or limitations are imposed or tightened, our ability to receive dividends or other payments from affected jurisdictions could be reduced, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, corporate, contract, property, insolvency, competition, securities and other laws and regulations in many of the countries in which we operate have been, and continue to be, substantially revised. Therefore, the interpretation and procedural safeguards of the new legal and regulatory systems are in the process of being developed and defined, and existing laws and regulations may be applied inconsistently. Also, in some circumstances, it may not be possible to obtain the legal remedies provided for under these laws and regulations in a reasonably timely manner, if at all.
Our ability to grow in international markets and our future results could be adversely affected by a number of factors, including:
changes in political and economic conditions and potential instability in certain regions;
restrictions on money transfers to, from and between certain countries;
inability to recruit and retain paying agents and customers for new corridors;
currency exchange controls, new currency adoptions and repatriation issues;
changes in regulatory requirements or in foreign policy, including the adoption of domestic or foreign laws, regulations and interpretations detrimental to our business;
possible increased costs and additional regulatory burdens imposed on our business;
the implementation of U.S. sanctions, resulting in bank closures in certain countries and the ultimate freezing of our assets;
burdens of complying with a wide variety of laws and regulations;
possible fraud or theft losses, and lack of compliance by international representatives in foreign legal jurisdictions where collection and legal enforcement may be difficult or costly;
inability to maintain or improve our software and technology systems;
reduced protection of our intellectual property rights;
unfavorable tax rules or trade barriers; and
inability to secure, train or monitor international agents.
If we are unable to adequately protect our brand and the intellectual property rights related to our existing and any new or enhanced services, or if we infringe on the rights of others, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The Intermex brand is critical to our business. We utilize trademark registrations and other tools to protect our brand. We have not applied for trademark registrations for our name and logo in all geographic markets where we provide services. In those markets where we have applied for trademark registrations, failure to secure those registrations could adversely affect our ability to enforce and defend our trademark rights. Our business would be harmed if we were unable to adequately protect our brand and the value of our brand was to decrease as a result.
We rely on a combination of patent, trademark and copyright laws and trade secret protection and invention assignment, confidentiality or license agreements to protect the intellectual property rights related to our services, all of which only offer limited protection. We may be subject to third-party claims alleging that we infringe their intellectual property rights or have misappropriated other proprietary rights. We may be required to spend resources to defend such claims or to protect and police our own rights. Some of our legal rights in information or technology that we deem proprietary may not be protected by intellectual property laws, particularly in foreign jurisdictions. The loss of our intellectual property protection, the inability to secure or enforce intellectual property protection or to successfully defend against claims of intellectual property infringement or misappropriation could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation.
19

The processes and systems we employ may be subject to patent protection by other parties, and any claims could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
In certain countries, including the United States, patent laws permit the protection of processes and systems. We employ processes and systems in various markets that have been used in the industry by other parties for many years. We or other companies that use these processes and systems consider many of them to be in the public domain. If a person were to assert that it holds a patent covering any of the processes or systems we use, we would be required to defend ourselves against such claim. If unsuccessful, we may be required to pay damages for past infringement, which could be trebled if the infringement was found to be willful. We also may be required to seek a license to continue to use the processes or systems. Such a license may require either a single payment or an ongoing license fee. No assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain a license which is reasonable in fee and scope. If a patent owner is unwilling to grant such a license, or we decide not to obtain such a license, we may be required to modify our processes and systems to avoid future infringement.
Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness
We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which may limit our operating flexibility and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We had approximately $89.4 million of indebtedness as of December 31, 2020, consisting of borrowings under the term loan facility. Our indebtedness could have important consequences to our investors, including, but not limited to:
increasing our vulnerability to, and reducing our flexibility to respond to, general adverse economic and industry conditions;
requiring the dedication of a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to servicing debt;
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the competitive environment; and
limiting our ability to borrow additional funds and increasing the cost of any such borrowing.
The interest rates in our Credit Agreement (“Credit Agreement”) vary at stated margins above either the London Interbank Offered Rate, Eurodollar Rate or a base rate established by the administrative agent of the facility, all of which are subject to fluctuation. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on such variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount borrowed remained the same. Accordingly, an increase in interest rates would adversely affect our profitability. See the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Intermex—Liquidity and Capital Resources” for more information.

We also are subject to capital requirements imposed by various regulatory bodies in the jurisdictions in which we operate. We may need access to external capital to support these regulatory requirements in order to maintain our licenses and our ability to earn revenue in these jurisdictions. An interruption of our access to capital could impair our ability to conduct business if our regulatory capital falls below requirements.
In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom, which regulates the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), publicly announced that it will no longer compel or persuade banks to make LIBOR submissions after 2021. Recently, the date for certain LIBOR tenors has been extended to June 2023. These announcements are expected to practically end LIBOR rates beginning in 2022. While other alternatives have been proposed, it is unclear which, if any, alternative to LIBOR will be available and widely accepted in major financial markets. We currently have borrowings that are subject to LIBOR-based interest rates, including borrowings under our credit facility. Any alternative to replace LIBOR after 2021 may increase the costs associated with our credit facility.
Our Credit Agreement contains restrictive covenants that may impair our ability to conduct business.
The Credit Agreement contains operating covenants and financial covenants that may in each case limit management’s discretion with respect to certain business matters. Among other things, these covenants restrict our and our subsidiaries’ ability to grant additional liens, consolidate or merge with other entities, purchase or sell assets, declare dividends, incur additional debt, make advances, investments and loans, transact with affiliates, issue equity interests, modify organizational documents and engage in other business. We are required to evaluatecomply with a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and report ona maximum consolidated leverage ratio. As a result of these covenants and restrictions, we may be limited in how we conduct our internal control procedures as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. A target companybusiness and we may be unable to raise additional debt or other financing to compete effectively or to take advantage of new business opportunities. The terms of any future indebtedness we may incur could include more restrictive covenants. Failure to comply with such restrictive covenants may lead to default and acceleration under our Credit Agreement and may impair our ability to conduct business. We may not be inable to maintain compliance with these covenants in the provisionsfuture and, if we fail to do so, that we will be able to obtain waivers from the lenders and/or amend the covenants, which may result in foreclosure of our assets. See the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacysection entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of their internal controls. The developmentFinancial Condition and Results of Operations of Intermex—Liquidity and Capital Resources” for more information.
20

Under our Credit Agreement, upon the internal controlsoccurrence of any such entityan event of default, the lenders will be able to achieve compliance withelect to declare all amounts outstanding under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increaseCredit Agreement to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to lend additional funds. If we are unable to repay those amounts, the time and costs necessarylenders under the Credit Agreement could proceed to complete any such acquisition.

foreclose against our collateral that secures that indebtedness. We arehave granted the lenders a security interest in substantially all of our assets, including the assets of certain subsidiaries.

Risks Relating to Our Securities
As an “emerging growth company,” we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to “emerging growth companies” will make our common stock less attractive to investors.
For as long as we remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBSJumpstart Our Business Startups Act andof 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies”, including but not limited to, not being required to comply withobtain an assessment of the auditor attestation requirementseffectiveness of sectionour internal controls over financial reporting from our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“Section 404”), reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholderstockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards, which we have elected to do.
We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, although if our non-convertible debt issued withinuntil the earlier of (1) the earliest of the last day of the fiscal year (a) following January 19, 2022, the fifth anniversary of us becoming a three year period or revenues exceeds $1publicly-traded company, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion or if(c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock that areis held by non-affiliates exceeds $700$700.0 million onas of the last business day of our prior second fiscal quarter, we would cease to be an “emerging growth company” as of the following fiscal year.


Item 1A.RISK FACTORS

You should consider carefully all of the risks described below, which we believe are the principal risks that we face and of which we are currently aware, and all of the other information contained in this report. If any of the events or developments described below occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected. 

We are an emerging growth company with no operating history and no revenue and, accordingly, you have no basis on which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective.

We are an emerging growth company with no operating history and no revenue. We will not commence operations until we consummate our initial business combination. Because we lack an operating history, you have no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective of acquiring one or more operating businesses in the financial technology industry. We may be unable to complete a business combination. If we fail to complete a business combination, we will never generate any operating revenues.

Our auditors have expressed substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern in their report.

In its report on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. A “going concern” opinion means, in general, that our independent registered public accounting firm has substantial doubt about our ability to continue our operations unless we complete a business combination by January 25, 2019.

Our public stockholders may not be afforded an opportunity to vote on our proposed business combination, unless such vote is required by law or Nasdaq, which means we may consummate our initial business combination even though a majority of our public stockholders do not support such a combination.

We may not hold a stockholder vote to approve our initial business combination unless the business combination would require stockholder approval under applicable state law or the rules of Nasdaq or if we decide to hold a stockholder vote for business or other reasons. For example, Nasdaq rules currently allow us to engage in a tender offer in lieu of a stockholder meeting but would still require us to obtain stockholder approval if we were seeking to issue more than 20% of our outstanding shares to a target business as consideration in any business combination. Therefore, if we structure a business combination that requires us to issue more than 20% of our outstanding shares, we would seek stockholder approval of such business combination. However, except as required by law, the decision as to whether we will seek stockholder approval of a proposed business combination will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors, such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise require us to seek stockholder approval. Accordingly, we may consummate our initial business combination even if holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock do not approve of the business combination we consummate.

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, our sponsor and the other initial holders have agreed to vote in favor of such initial business combination, regardless of how our public stockholders vote.

Unlike many other blank check companies in which the founders agree to vote their founder shares in accordance with the majority of the votes cast by the public stockholders in connection with an initial business combination, our sponsor and the other initial holders have agreed to vote those shares and any placement shares and public shares they hold, in favor of our initial business combination. If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, it is more likely that the necessary stockholder approval will be received than would be the case if holders of founder shares agreed to vote their founder shares, placement shares and public shares in accordance with the majority of the votes cast by our public stockholders.

Your ability to affect the investment decision regarding a potential business combination may be limited to the exercise of your right to redeem your shares from us for cash, unless we seek stockholder approval of the business combination.

At the time of your investment in us, you will not be provided with an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or risks of any target businesses. Since our board of directors may consummate a business combination without seeking stockholder approval, public stockholders may not have the right to vote on the business combination unless we seek such stockholder vote. Accordingly, your ability to affect the investment decision regarding a potential business combination may be limited to exercising your redemption rights with respect to a proposed business combination.


The ability of our public stockholders to redeem their shares for cash may make us unattractive to potential business combination targets, which may make it difficult for us to enter into a business combination with a target.

We may enter into a transaction agreement with a prospective target that requires as a closing condition that we have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation requires us to provide all of our stockholders with an opportunity to redeem all of their shares in connection with the consummation of any initial business combination, although each initial holder and each holder of placement units has agreed to waive his, her or its respective redemption rights with respect to founder shares and placement shares, and in the case of the initial holders, public shares, held by him, her or it in connection with the consummation of our initial business combination. Consequently, if accepting all properly submitted redemption requests would cause our net tangible assets to be less than the amount necessary to satisfy a closing condition as described above, or less than the $5,000,001 minimum of tangible net assets which we are required to maintain, we would not proceed with such redemption and the related business combination. Prospective targets would be aware of these risks and, thus, may be reluctant to enter into a business combination transaction with us. The Merger Agreement requires that, unless waived by Intermex, the amount in our trust account at closing, after giving effect to the redemption of public shares, shall be no less than $125,000,000.

The ability of our stockholders to exercise redemption rights may not allow us to consummate the most desirable business combination or optimize our capital structure.

In connection with the consummation of our business combination, we may redeem up to that number of shares of common stock that would permit us to maintain net tangible assets of $5,000,001 upon consummation of our initial business combination. However, we may be required to maintain significantly larger amounts of cash depending upon the terms of the business combination. Accordingly, we may need to arrange third party financing to help fund our business combination in case a larger percentage of stockholders exercise their redemption rights than we expect. Raising additional funds to cover any shortfall may involve dilutive equity financing or incurring indebtedness at higher than desirable levels. This may limit our ability to effectuate the most attractive business combination available to us. The Merger Agreement requires that, unless waived by Intermex, the amount in our trust account at closing, after giving effect to the redemption of public shares, shall be no less than $125,000,000.

The requirement that we maintain a minimum net worth or retain a certain amount of cash could increase the probability that we will be unable to complete a proposed business combination and that you would have to wait for liquidation in order to redeem your stock.

If, pursuant to the terms of our proposed business combination, we are required to maintain a minimum net worth or retain a certain amount of cash in trust in order to consummate the business combination, the ability of our public shareholders to cause us to redeem their shares in connection with such proposed transaction will increase the risk that we will not meet that condition and, accordingly, that we will not be able to complete the proposed transaction. If we do not complete a proposed business combination, you would not receive your pro rata portion of the trust account until we liquidate or you are able to sell your stock in the open market. If you were to attempt to sell your stock in the open market at that time, the price you receive could represent a discount to the pro rata amount in our trust account. In either situation, you may suffer a material loss on your investment or lose the benefit of funds expected in connection with our redemption until we liquidate.

The requirement that we complete a business combination by January 25, 2019 may give potential target businesses leverage over us in negotiating a business combination and may decrease our ability to conduct due diligence on potential business combination targets as we approach our dissolution deadline, which could undermine our ability to consummate a business combination on terms that would produce value for our stockholders.

Any potential target business with which we enter into negotiations concerning a business combination will be aware that we must consummate a business combination by January 25, 2019. Consequently, such target businesses may obtain leverage over us in negotiating a business combination, knowing that if we do not complete a business combination with it, we may be unable to identify another target business and complete a business combination with any target business. This risk will increase as we get closer to January 25, 2019. Depending upon when we identify a potential target business, we may have only a limited time to conduct due diligence and may enter into a business combination on terms that we might have rejected upon a more comprehensive investigation.


We may not be able to consummate a business combination by January 25, 2019, in which case we would cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up and we would redeem our public shares and liquidate.

We must complete our initial business combination by January 25, 2019. We may not be able to find a suitable target business and consummate a business combination within that time period. If we have not consummated a business combination by January 25, 2019, or earlier, at the discretion of our board pursuant to the expiration of a tender offer conducted in connection with a failed business combination, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem all public shares then outstanding at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including any amounts representing interest earned on the trust account, less any interest released to us for working capital purposes, the payment of taxes or dissolution expenses, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law.

If we are unable to complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame, our warrants will expire worthless.

Our outstanding warrants may not be exercised until after the completion of our initial business combination and are not entitled to participate in the redemption of the shares of our common stock conducted in connection with the consummation of our business combination. Accordingly, our warrants will expire worthless if we are unable to consummate a business combination by January 25, 2019, or earlier if our board resolves to liquidate and dissolve in connection with a failed business combination.

If we seek stockholder approval of our business combination, our initial stockholders, directors, officers and their affiliates may elect to purchase shares of common stock from public stockholders, in which case they may influence a vote in favor of a proposed business combination that you do not support.

If we seek stockholder approval of our business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our initial stockholders, directors, officers or their respective affiliates may purchase shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions either prior to or following the consummation of our initial business combination. Our initial stockholders, directors, officers and their respective affiliates may also enter into transactions with stockholders and others to provide them with incentives to, among other things, acquire shares of our common stock or vote their shares in favor of an initial business combination. Our directors, officers or their affiliates will not make any such purchases when they are in possession of any material non-public information not disclosed to the seller or during a restricted period under Regulation M under the Exchange Act or in a transaction which would violate Section 9(a)(2) or Rule 10(b)-5 under the Exchange Act. Such a purchase would include a contractual acknowledgement that such stockholder, although still the record holder of our shares is no longer the beneficial owner thereof and therefore agrees not to exercise its redemption rights. In the event that our initial stockholders, directors, officers or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions from public stockholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling stockholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares.


You will not have any rights to or interest in funds from the trust account, except under limited circumstances. To liquidate your investment, therefore, you may be forced to sell your shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.

Our public stockholders will be entitled to receive funds from the trust account only upon the earlier to occur of: (i) the consummation of our initial business combination; (ii) the redemption of our public shares if we are unable to consummate a business combination by January 25, 2019, subject to applicable law; (iii) the redemption of any public shares properly tendered in connection with a stockholder vote to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination by January 25, 2019; or (iv) otherwise upon our liquidation or in the event our board of directors resolves to liquidate the trust account and ceases to pursue the consummation of a business combination prior to January 25, 2019 (our board of directors may determine to liquidate the trust account prior to such date if it determines, in its business judgment, that it is improbable within the remaining time that we will be able to identify an attractive business combination or satisfy regulatory and other business and legal requirements to consummate a business combination). In addition, if our plan to redeem our public shares if we are unable to consummate an initial business combination by January 25, 2019 is not consummated for any reason, Delaware law may require that we submit a plan of dissolution to our then-existing stockholders for approval prior to the distribution of the proceeds held in our trust account. In that case, public stockholders may be forced to wait beyond January 25, 2019 before they receive funds from our trust account. In no other circumstances will a public stockholder have any right or interest of any kind in the trust account. Accordingly, to liquidate your investment, you may be forced to sell your public shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.

You will not be entitled to protections normally afforded to investors of many other blank check companies.

Because we had net tangible assets in excess of $5.0 million upon the completion of the initial public offering and we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, including an audited balance sheet demonstrating this fact, we are exempt from rules promulgated by the SEC to protect investors in blank check companies, such as Rule 419 under the Securities Act. Accordingly, investors will not be afforded the benefits or protections of those rules. Among other things, this means our units were immediately tradable and we have a longer period of time to complete a business combination than would companies subject to Rule 419. Moreover, offerings subject to Rule 419 would prohibit the release of any interest earned on funds held in the trust account to us, except in connection with our consummation of an initial business combination.

If we seek stockholder approval of our business combination and we do not conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, a stockholder, or a “group” of stockholders, who are deemed to hold an aggregate of 20.0% or more of our common stock may not redeem any shares they hold that equal or exceed such 20.0% amount.

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that a public stockholder, together with any affiliate of such stockholder or any other person with whom such stockholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from seeking redemption rights with respect to shares in excess of 20.0% or more of the shares sold in the initial public offering. We refer to such shares in excess of 20.0% or more of the shares sold in the initial public offering as “Excess Shares”. Your inability to redeem any Excess Shares will reduce your influence over our ability to consummate a business combination and you could suffer a material loss on your investment in us if you sell Excess Shares in open market transactions. Additionally, you will not receive redemption distributions with respect to the Excess Shares if we consummate our business combination. As a result, you would continue to hold that number of shares exceeding 20.0% (less one share) and, in order to dispose of such shares, would be required to sell them in open market transactions, potentially at a loss.

If the net proceeds from the initial public offering and the private placement held out of trust and the interest income earned on the trust account together with funds made available to us by our sponsor through loans (a maximum of $1,100,000) are insufficient to allow us to operate until January 25, 2019, we may be unable to complete our initial business combination.

Although we believe that the net proceeds from the initial public offering and the private placement held out of trust and the interest income earned on the trust account, together with funds made available to us by our sponsor through loans, which are limited to $1,100,000, will be sufficient to allow us to operate until January 25, 2019, we cannot assure you of this. In particular, if we use a portion of the funds available to us to pay fees to consultants to assist us with our search for a target business, as a down payment on an acquisition or to fund a “no-shop” provision (a provision in letters of intent designed to keep target businesses from “shopping” around for transactions with other companies on terms more favorable to such target businesses) with respect to a particular proposed business combination, we could expend funds available to us more rapidly than we currently expect. It is possible that the amounts demanded for a no-shop provision or down payments will be in excess of funds then available to us, which would impair our ability to close a contemplated transaction. Furthermore, if we entered into a letter of intent where we paid for the right to receive exclusivity from a target business and were subsequently required to forfeit such funds (whether as a result of our breach or otherwise), we might not have sufficient funds to continue searching for, or conduct due diligence with respect to, a target business.


The current low interest rate environment could limit the amount available to fund our search for a target business or businesses and complete our initial business combination since we will depend, in part, on interest earned on the trust account to fund our search, to pay our franchise and income taxes and to complete our initial business combination.

In addition to depending upon loans from our sponsor, we will depend on interest being earned on the proceeds held in the trust account to provide us with up to $500,000 in working capital we may need to identify one or more target businesses and to complete our initial business combination, as well as to pay any franchise and income taxes that we may owe. Because of the current low interest rate environment, we may be unable to generate enough interest to fund our needs, thereby reducing funds available to us to identify target businesses and to structure, negotiate or close our initial business combination. If our funds are insufficient, and we are unable to generate funds from other sources, we may be forced to liquidate.

Subsequent to consummation of our initial business combination, we may be required to take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and our stock price, which could cause you to lose some or all of your investment.

Even if we conduct extensive due diligence on a target business with which we combine, we cannot assure you that this examination will uncover all material risks that may be presented by a particular target business, or that factors outside of the target business and outside of our control will not later arise. Even if our due diligence successfully identifies the principal risks, unexpected risks may arise and previously known risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with our preliminary risk analysis. As a result, from time to time following our initial business combination, we may be forced to write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in our reporting losses. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our securities. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to violate net worth or other covenants to which we may be subject as a result of assuming pre-existing debt held by a target business or by virtue of our obtaining post-combination debt financing.

If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders may be less than $10.00 per share.

Placing funds in the trust account may not protect those funds from third party claims against us. Although we seek to have all vendors, service providers, prospective target businesses or other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim in or to any monies held in the trust account for the benefit of our public stockholders, such parties may not execute such agreements or, even if they execute such agreements, they may not be prevented from bringing claims against the trust account, including, but not limited to, claims for fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver. If any third party refuses to execute an agreement waiving claims to the monies held in the trust account, our management will perform an analysis of the alternatives available to it and will only enter into an agreement without a waiver if management believes that such third party’s engagement would be significantly more beneficial to us than any available alternative. If we do not obtain a waiver from a third party, we will obtain the written consent of our sponsor before entering into an agreement with such third party.


Examples of possible instances where we may engage a third party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third party consultant whose particular expertise or skills management believes to be significantly superior to those of other consultants who would execute a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver and where our sponsor executes a written consent. In addition, there is no guarantee that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the trust account for any reason. Upon redemption of our public shares, if we are unable to complete a business combination within the required time frame, or upon the exercise of a redemption right in connection with a business combination, we will be required to provide for payment of claims of creditors that were not waived that may be brought against us within the 10 years following redemption. Accordingly, the per-share redemption amount received by public stockholders could be less than the $10.00 per share initially held in the trust account due to claims of such creditors. Pursuant to a written agreement, Daniel G. Cohen has agreed that he will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a vendor for services rendered or products sold to us, or a prospective target business with which we discussed entering into a transaction agreement, reduce the amounts in the trust account to below $10.00 per share except as to any claims by a third party who executed a waiver of rights to seek access to the trust account and except as to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of the initial public offering against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Moreover, if an executed waiver is deemed to be unenforceable against a third party, Mr. Cohen will not be responsible to the extent of any liability for such third party claims. We have not independently verified whether Mr. Cohen has sufficient funds to satisfy his indemnity obligations, we have not asked Mr. Cohen to reserve for such indemnification obligations and we cannot assure you that he would be able to satisfy those obligations.

Our directors may decide not to enforce the indemnification obligations of Daniel G. Cohen, resulting in a reduction in the amount of funds in the trust account available for distribution to our public stockholders.

If proceeds in the trust account are reduced below $10.00 per public share and Daniel G. Cohen asserts that he is unable to satisfy his obligations or that he has no indemnification obligations related to a particular claim, our independent directors would determine whether to take legal action against Mr. Cohen to enforce his indemnification obligations. While we currently expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf against Mr. Cohen to enforce his indemnification obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their business judgment may choose not to do so in any particular instance. If our independent directors choose not to enforce these indemnification obligations, the amount of funds in the trust account available for distribution to our public stockholders may be reduced below $10.00 per share.

If, after we distribute the proceeds in the trust account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, a bankruptcy court may seek to recover such proceeds, and the members of our board of directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to our creditors, thereby exposing the members of our board of directors and us to claims of punitive damages.

If, after we distribute the proceeds in the trust account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy court could seek to recover all amounts received by our stockholders. In addition, by making distributions to public stockholders before making provision for creditors, our board of directors may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or having acted in bad faith, thereby exposing itself and us to claims for punitive damages.

If, before distributing the proceeds in the trust account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the claims of creditors in such proceeding may have priority over the claims of our stockholders and the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our stockholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.

If, before distributing the proceeds in the trust account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of our stockholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our stockholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.


If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may be subject to burdensome regulatory requirements and our activities may be restricted, which may make it difficult for us to complete a business combination.

If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, our activities may be restricted, including:

restrictions on the nature of our investments;

restrictions on the issuance of securities; and

restrictions on the incurrence of debt;

each of which may make it difficult for us to complete a business combination.

In addition, we may have to:

register as an investment company;

adopt a specific form of corporate structure; and

file reports, maintain records, and adhere to voting, proxy, disclosure and other requirements.

We do not believe that our principal activities will subject us to Investment Company Act regulation. The proceeds held in the trust account may be invested by the trustee only in United States government treasury bills with a maturity of 180 days or less or in money market funds investing solely in United States treasury and meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act. Because the investment of the proceeds is restricted to these instruments, we believe we meet the requirements for the exemption provided in Rule 3a-1 promulgated under the Investment Company Act. If we were deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act, compliance with these additional regulatory burdens would require additional expenses for which we have not allotted funds and may make it more difficult to complete our initial business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share on our redemption, and our warrants will expire worthless.

Changes in laws or regulations, or a failure to comply with any laws and regulations, may adversely affect our business, investments and results of operations.

We are subject to laws and regulations enacted by national, regional and local governments, including in particular, reporting and other requirements under the Exchange Act. Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable laws and regulations may be difficult, time consuming and costly. Those laws and regulations and their interpretation and application may also change from time to time and those changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, investments and results of operations. In addition, a failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted and applied, could result in fines, injunctive relief or similar remedies which could be costly to us or limit our ability to complete an initial business combination or operate the post-combination company successfully.

Our stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against us to the extent of distributions received by them upon redemption of their shares.

Under the DGCL, stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against a corporation to the extent of distributions received by them in a dissolution. The pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares in the event we do not consummate our initial business combination by January 25, 2019 may be considered a liquidation distribution under Delaware law. If a corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in Section 280 of the DGCL intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision for all claims against it, including a 60-day notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought against the corporation, a 90-day period during which the corporation may reject any claims brought, and an additional 150-day waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution. However, it is our intention to redeem our public shares as soon as reasonably possible following January 25, 2019 if we do not consummate an initial business combination and, therefore, we do not intend to comply with those procedures.


Because we will not be complying with Section 280, Section 281(b) of the DGCL requires us to adopt a plan, based on facts known to us at such time that will provide for our payment of all existing and pending claims or claims that may be potentially brought against us within the 10 years following our dissolution. However, because we are a blank check company, rather than an operating company, and our operations are limited to searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from our vendors (such as lawyers or investment bankers) or prospective target businesses. If our plan of distribution complies with Section 281(b) of the DGCL, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would likely be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution. We cannot assure you that we will properly assess all claims that may be potentially brought against us. As such, our stockholders could potentially be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received by them (but no more) and any liability of our stockholders may extend beyond the third anniversary of such date. Furthermore, if the pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares if we do not consummate our initial business combination by January 25, 2019 is not considered a liquidation distribution under Delaware law and such redemption distribution is deemed to be unlawful, then pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL, the statute of limitations for claims of creditors could then be six years after the unlawful redemption distribution, instead of three years, as in the case of a liquidation distribution.

We may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders until after we consummate a business combination.

We may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders until after we consummate a business combination (unless required by Nasdaq), and thus may not be in compliance with Section 211(b) of the DGCL, which requires that an annual meeting of stockholders be held for the purposes of electing directors in accordance with a company’s bylaws unless directors are elected by written consent in lieu of such a meeting. Therefore, if our stockholders want us to hold an annual meeting prior to our consummation of a business combination, they may attempt to force us to hold one by submitting an application to the Delaware Court of Chancery in accordance with Section 211(c) of the DGCL.

We are not registering the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants under the Securities Act or any state securities laws at this time, and such registration may not be in place when an investor desires to exercise warrants, thus precluding such investor from being able to exercise its warrants and causing such warrants to expire worthless.

We are not registering the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants under the Securities Act or any state securities laws at this time. However, under the terms of the warrant agreement, we have agreed to use our best efforts to file a registration statement under the Securities Act covering such shares and maintain a current prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants, and to use our best efforts to take such action as is necessary to register or qualify for sale, in those states in which the warrants were initially offered by us, the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants, to the extent an exemption is not available. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so. If the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act, we will be required to permit holders to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis under the circumstances specified in the warrant agreement. However, except as specified in the warrant agreement, in no event will we be required to issue cash, securities or other compensation in exchange for the warrants if we are unable to register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under the Securities Act or applicable state securities laws. If the issuance of the shares upon exercise of the warrants is not so registered or qualified, the warrant holder will not be entitled to exercise such warrant and such warrant may have no value and expire worthless. In such event, holders who acquired their warrants as part of a purchase of units will have paid the full unit purchase price solely for the shares of common stock included in the units. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying shares of common stock for sale under all applicable state securities laws.


The grant of registration rights to our initial stockholders and purchasers of placement units may make it more difficult to complete our initial business combination, and the future exercise of such rights may reduce the market price of our common stock.

Pursuant to an agreement entered into concurrently with the issuance and sale of the securities in the initial public offering, our initial holders, purchasers of placement units and their permitted transferees can demand that we register the founder shares, placement units, placement shares and placement warrants, and the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the placement warrants. These registration rights will be exercisable at any time commencing upon the date that such shares are released from transfer. We will bear the cost of registering these securities. The registration and availability of such a significant number of securities for trading in the public market may reduce the market price of our common stock. In addition, the existence of the registration rights may make our initial business combination more costly or difficult to conclude because the stockholders of the target business may increase the equity stake they seek in the combined entity or ask for more cash consideration to offset the negative impact on the market price of our common stock that is expected when the securities owned by our initial stockholders are registered.

We may seek investment opportunities in sectors outside of our industry focus (which may or may not be outside of our management’s area of expertise).

Although we currently intend to consummate a business combination in the financial technology industry, we will consider a business combination outside this industry if a business combination candidate is presented to us and we determine that such candidate offers an attractive investment opportunity for our company. If we elect to pursue an investment outside of the financial technology industry, our management’s expertise in that industry would not be directly applicable to its evaluation or operation, and the information contained herein regarding the financial technology industry might not be relevant to an understanding of the business that we elect to acquire.

Although we have identified general criteria and guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective target businesses, we may enter into a business combination with a target that does not meet such criteria and guidelines and, as a result, the target business with which we enter into our initial business combination may not have attributes entirely consistent with our general criteria and guidelines.

Although we have identified specific criteria and guidelines for evaluating prospective target businesses, it is possible that a target business with which we enter into a business combination will not have all of these positive attributes. If we consummate a business combination with a target that does not meet some or all of these guidelines, such combination may not be as successful as a combination with a business that does meet all of our general criteria and guidelines. In addition, if we announce a prospective business combination with a target that does not meet our general criteria and guidelines, a greater number of stockholders may exercise their redemption rights, which may make it difficult for us to meet any closing condition with a target business that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. In addition, if stockholder approval of the transaction is required by law or Nasdaq, or we decide to obtain stockholder approval for business or other reasons, it may be more difficult for us to obtain stockholder approval of our initial business combination if the target business does not meet our general criteria and guidelines. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share on our redemption, and our warrants will expire worthless.

We are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm and, consequently, you may have no assurance from an independent source that the price we are paying for the target in our initial business combination is fair to our stockholders from a financial point of view.

Unless we consummate our initial business combination with an affiliated entity, we are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that the price we are paying is fair to our stockholders from a financial point of view. If we do not obtain an opinion, our stockholders will be relying on the judgment of our board of directors, who will determine fair market value based on standards generally accepted by the financial community. Such standards used will be disclosed in our tender offer documents or proxy solicitation materials, as applicable, related to our initial business combination.


We may issue additional common or preferred shares to complete our initial business combination or under an employee incentive plan after consummation of our initial business combination, which would dilute the interest of our stockholders and likely present other risks.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 35,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share. The issuance of additional shares of common or preferred stock:

may significantly dilute the equity interest of investors in the initial public offering;

may subordinate the rights of holders of common stock if preferred stock is issued with rights senior to those afforded our common stock;

could cause a change in control if a substantial number of shares of common stock is issued, which may affect, among other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation or removal of our present officers and directors; and

may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our units, common stock and/or warrants.

Resources could be wasted in researching acquisitions that are not consummated, which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate another target business and consummate our initial business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share from our redemption of our shares and our warrants will expire worthless.

We anticipate that the investigation of each specific target business and the negotiation, drafting, and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents, and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys and others. If we decide not to complete a specific initial business combination, the costs incurred up to that point for the proposed transaction likely would not be recoverable. Furthermore, if we reach an agreement relating to a specific target business, we may fail to consummate our initial business combination for any number of reasons including those beyond our control. Any such event will result in a loss to us of the related costs incurred, which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another business due to a reduction in the funds available for expenses relating to such efforts. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share from our redemption of their shares and our warrants will expire worthless.

We are dependent upon our officers and directors; the loss of any one or more of them could adversely affect our ability to complete a business combination.

Our operations depend upon the background, experience and contacts of our officers and directors. We believe that our success depends on the continued service of our officers and directors, at least until we have consummated a business combination. We do not have an employment agreement with, or key-man insurance on the life of, any of our directors or officers. In addition, our executive officers and directors are not required to, and do not, commit their full time to our affairs, which may result in a conflict of interest in allocating their time between our operations and the search for a business combination and their other business commitments. We do not intend to have any full-time employees prior to the consummation of our business combination. Each of our executive officers and directors is engaged in other business endeavors and is not obligated to contribute any specific number of hours per week to our affairs. If our executive officers’ and directors’ other business commitments require them to devote substantial amounts of time in excess of their current commitment levels, it could limit their ability to devote time to our affairs which make it more difficult for us to identify an acquisition target and consummate our business combination.

Our success following our initial business combination likely will depend upon the efforts of management of the target business. The loss of any of the key personnel of the target’s management team could make it more difficult to operate the target profitably.

Although some of our key personnel may remain with the target business in senior management or advisory positions following a business combination, we can offer no assurance that any will do so. Moreover, as a result of the existing commitments of our key personnel, it is likely that we will retain some or all of the management of the target business to conduct its operations. The departure of any key members of the target’s management team could thus make it more difficult to operate the post-combination business profitably. Moreover, to the extent that we will rely upon the target’s management team to operate the post-combination business, we will be subject to risks regarding their managerial competence. While we intend to closely scrutinize the skills, abilities and qualifications of any individuals we retain after a business combination, our ability to do so may be limited due to a lack of time resources or information. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that our assessment of these individuals will prove to be correct and that they will have the skills, abilities and qualifications we expect.


Our key personnel may negotiate employment or consulting agreements with a target business in connection with our initial business combination. These agreements may provide for them to receive compensation following our initial business combination and, as a result, may cause them to have conflicts of interest in determining whether a particular business combination would be advantageous to us.

Our key personnel may decide to remain with the company after the consummation of our initial business combination only if they are able to negotiate employment or consulting agreements in connection with the business combination. Such negotiations would take place simultaneously with the negotiation of the business combination and could provide for such individuals to receive compensation in the form of cash payments and/or our securities for services they would render to us after the consummation of our initial business combination. The personal and financial interests of such individuals may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a target business and cause them to have conflicts of interest in determining whether a particular business combination would be advantageous to us. However, we believe the ability of such individuals to remain with us after the consummation of our initial business combination will not be the determining factor in our decision as to whether or not we will proceed with any potential business combination. There is no certainty, however, that any of our key personnel will remain with us after the consummation of our initial business combination. We cannot assure you that any of our key personnel will remain in senior management or advisory positions with us. The determination as to whether any of our key personnel will remain with us will be made at the time of our initial business combination.

Our officers and directors are now and may in the future become affiliated with entities engaged in business activities similar to those intended to be conducted by us and, accordingly, may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.

Until we consummate our initial business combination, we will engage in the business of identifying and combining with one or more businesses, with a focus on financial technology businesses. Our executive officers and directors are now and may in the future become affiliated with entities that are in the financial services or financial technology industries or entities engaged in the business of acquiring other entities or businesses. In each case, our executive officers and directors’ existing directorships or other responsibilities may give rise to contractual or fiduciary obligations that take priority over any obligation owed to us. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the doctrine of corporate opportunity, or any other analogous doctrine, does not apply to us or any of our officers or directors or in circumstances that would conflict with any fiduciary duties or contractual obligations to other entities they may have as of the date of this Annual Report. Accordingly, business opportunities that may be attractive to the entities described above will not be presented to us unless such entities have declined to accept such opportunities. As a result, our officers and directors may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. We cannot assure you that these conflicts will be resolved in our favor or that a potential target business would not be presented to another entity prior to its presentation to us.


We may engage in a business combination with one or more target businesses that have relationships with entities that may be affiliated with our executive officers, directors or existing stockholders, which may raise potential conflicts of interest.

We may decide to acquire one or more businesses affiliated with holders of founder shares, or our officers and directors. Our officers and directors also serve as officers and board members of other entities. Such entities may compete with us for business combination opportunities. The holders of founder shares and our officers and directors are not currently aware of any specific opportunities for us to consummate a business combination with any entities with which they are affiliated, and there have been no preliminary discussions concerning a business combination with any such entity or entities. Although we will not be specifically focusing on, or targeting, any transaction with any affiliated entities, we would pursue such a transaction if we determined that the targeted affiliated entity met our criteria for a business combination and the transaction was approved by a majority of our disinterested directors. Despite our agreement to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that is reasonably acceptable to Cantor Fitzgerald, as representative of the underwriters, regarding the fairness to our stockholders from a financial point of view of a business combination with one or more businesses affiliated with our executive officers, directors or holders of founder shares, potential conflicts of interest still may exist and, as a result, the terms of the business combination may not be as advantageous to our public stockholders as they would be absent any conflicts of interest.

We may have a limited ability to assess the management of a prospective target business and, as a result, may effect our initial business combination with a target business whose management may not have the skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company.

When evaluating the desirability of effecting a business combination with a prospective target business, our ability to assess the target business’ management may be limited due to a lack of time, resources or information. Our assessment of the capabilities of the target’s management, therefore, may prove to be incorrect and such management may lack the skills, qualifications or abilities we expected. Should the target’s management not possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to manage a public company, the operations and profitability of the post-combination business may be negatively impacted.

The officers and directors of an acquisition candidate may resign upon consummation of a business combination. The loss of an acquisition target’s key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.

The role of an acquisition candidate’s key personnel upon the consummation of our initial business combination cannot be ascertained at this time. Although we contemplate that certain members of an acquisition candidate’s management team will remain associated with us following our initial business combination, it is possible that members of the management of an acquisition candidate will not wish to remain in place. The loss of an acquisition target’s key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.

We may partner, submit a joint bid or enter into a similar transaction with holders of founder shares or an affiliate in connection with our pursuit of, or in connection with, a business combination.

We are not prohibited from partnering, submitting a joint bid or entering into any similar transaction with holders of founder shares or their affiliates in our pursuit of a business combination. Although we currently have no plans to do so, we could pursue such a transaction if we determined that such affiliated entity met our criteria for a business combination and the transaction was approved by a majority of our disinterested directors. Despite our agreement to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that is reasonably acceptable to Cantor Fitzgerald, as representative of the underwriters, regarding the fairness to our stockholders from a financial point of view of a business combination with any holder of founder shares or its affiliates, the terms of the business combination may not be as advantageous to our public stockholders as they would be absent any conflicts of interest. Additionally, were we successful in consummating such a transaction, conflicts could invariably arise from the interest of the holder of founder shares or its affiliate in maximizing its returns, which may be at odds with the strategy of the post-business combination company or not in the best interests of the public stockholders of the post-business combination company. Any or all of such conflicts could materially reduce the value of your investment, whether before or after our initial business combination.


Since holders of founder shares and placement units will lose some or all of their investment in us if we do not consummate a business combination, and since certain of our officers and directors have significant financial interests in us, a conflict of interest may arise in determining whether a particular acquisition target is appropriate for our initial business combination.

Holders of founder shares will be worthless if we do not consummate our initial business combination. There will be no redemption rights or liquidating distributions from the trust account with respect to the founder shares, placement shares or warrants, which will expire worthless if we do not consummate a business combination by January 25, 2019. If we do not consummate a business combination, our sponsor will realize a loss on the placement shares it purchased. Our sponsor has also committed to lend us up to $1,100,000 to fund our operations prior to our initial business combination. These loans are repayable only if we complete our initial business combination. As a result, the personal and financial interests of certain of our officers and directors, directly or as members of our sponsor, in consummating an initial business combination, along with their flexibility in identifying and selecting a prospective acquisition candidate, may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a target business combination and completing an initial business combination that is not in the best interests of our stockholders. Consequently, the discretion of our officers and directors, in identifying and selecting a suitable target business combination may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether the terms, conditions and timing of a particular initial business combination are appropriate and in the best interest of our public stockholders.

We may issue notes or other debt securities, or otherwise incur substantial debt, to complete a business combination, which may adversely affect our financial condition and the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.

We may choose to incur substantial debt in order to complete our initial business combination. The incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative effects, including:

default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues after an initial business combination are insufficient to meet our debt service obligations;

acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness, even if we make all principal and interest payments when due, if we breach covenants that require the maintenance of financial ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation of that covenant;

our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt is payable on demand and the lender demands payment;

our inability to obtain necessary additional financing if any debt we incur contains covenants restricting our ability to obtain additional financing while the debt is outstanding;

prohibitions of, or limitations on, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock;

use of a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our debt, which will reduce the funds available for dividends on our common stock if declared, as well as for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;

limitations on our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business and in the industry in which we operate;

increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation; and

limitations on our ability to borrow additional amounts for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of growth strategies and other purposes and other disadvantages compared to our competitors who have less debt.

We do not have a policy with respect to how much debt we may incur. To the extent that the amount of our debt increases, the impact of the effects listed above may also increase.


We may be able to complete a business combination with only one business, which would result in our success being dependent solely on a single business which may have a limited number of products or services. This lack of diversification may harm our operations and profitability.

We are not limited as to the number of businesses we may acquire in our initial business combination. However, we may not be able to effectuate a business combination with more than one target business because of various factors, including the limited amount of the net proceeds of the initial public offering, the existence of complex accounting issues and the requirement that we prepare and file pro forma financial statements with the SEC that present operating results and the financial condition of several target businesses as if they had been operated on a combined basis. By consummating an initial business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory risks particular to the industry area in which the acquired business operates. Further, we would not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several business combinations in different industries or different areas of a single industry. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may:

solely depend upon the performance of a single business, property or asset, or

depend upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services.

We may attempt to consummate business combinations with multiple prospective targets simultaneously, which may hinder our ability to consummate an initial business combination and give rise to increased costs and risks that could negatively impact our operations and profitability.

If we determine to acquire several businesses simultaneously that are owned by different sellers, we will need each seller to agree that our purchase of its business is contingent on the simultaneous closings of the other business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us, and delay our ability, to complete the initial business combination. With multiple business combinations, we could also face additional risks, including additional burdens and costs with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due diligence investigations (if there are multiple sellers) and the additional risks associated with the subsequent assimilation of the operations and services or products of the acquired companies in a single operating business. If we are unable to adequately address these risks, we may be unable to operate the combined business successfully, and you could lose some or all of your investment in us.

We may attempt to consummate our initial business combination with a private company about which little information is available, which may result in a business combination with a company that is not as profitable as we expected, or at all.

In pursuing our acquisition strategy, we may seek to effectuate our initial business combination with a privately held company. By definition, very little public information exists about private companies, and we could be required to make our decision on whether to pursue a potential initial business combination on the basis of the information developed during our due diligence examination, which may be limited. As a result, we could acquire a company that is not as profitable as we expected, or at all. Furthermore, the relative lack of information about a private company may hinder our ability to properly assess the value of such a company which could result in our overpaying for that company.

If we effect our initial business combination with a business located outside of the United States, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that could result in us being unable to operate the business successfully.

We may effect an initial business combination with a business located outside of the United States. If we do, we would be subject to any special considerations or risks associated with businesses operating in the target’s home jurisdiction, including any of the following:

rules and regulations or currency conversion or corporate withholding taxes on individuals;

tariffs and trade barriers;

regulations related to customs and import/export matters;

longer payment cycles;

tax issues, such as tax law changes and variations in tax laws as compared to the United States;

currency fluctuations and exchange controls;


challenges in collecting accounts receivable;

cultural and language differences;

employment regulations;

crime, strikes, riots, civil disturbances, terrorist attacks and wars; and

deterioration of political relations with the United States.

We may not be able to adequately address these additional risks. If we are unable to do so, we may be unable to operate the acquired business successfully.

If we effect our initial business combination with a business located outside of the United States, the laws applicable to such business will likely govern all of our material agreements and we may not be able to enforce our legal rights.

If we effect our initial business combination with a business located outside of the United States, the laws of the country in which such business operates will govern almost all of the material agreements relating to its operations. The target business may not be able to enforce any of its material agreements or enforce remedies for breaches of those agreements in that jurisdiction. The system of laws and the enforcement of existing laws in such jurisdiction may not be as certain in implementation and interpretation as in the United States. The inability to enforce or obtain a remedy under any of our future agreements could result in a significant loss of business, business opportunities or capital. Additionally, if we acquire a business located outside of the United States, it is likely that substantially all of our assets would be located outside of the United States and some of our officers and directors might reside outside of the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors in the United States to enforce their legal rights, to effect service of process upon our directors or officers or to enforce judgments of United States courts predicated upon civil liabilities and criminal penalties of our directors and officers under federal securities laws.

We may not be able to maintain control of a target business after our initial business combination. We cannot provide assurance that, upon loss of control of a target business, new management will possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to profitably operate such business.

We anticipate structuring our initial business combination to acquire 100% of the equity interest or assets of the target business or businesses. However, we may structure our initial business combination to acquire less than 100% of the equity interest or assets of the target business, but only if we (or any entity that is a successor to us in a business combination) acquire a majority of the outstanding voting securities or assets of the target. Even if we own a majority interest in the target, our stockholders prior to the business combination may collectively own a minority interest in the post business combination company, depending on valuations ascribed to the target and us in the business combination transaction. For example, we could pursue a transaction in which we issue a substantial number of new shares of common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of a target. In this case, we would acquire a 100% interest in the target. However, as a result of the issuance of a substantial number of new shares of common stock, our stockholders immediately prior to such transaction could own less than a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock subsequent to such transaction, which is the case with respect to the proposed Intermex transaction. In addition, other minority stockholders may subsequently combine their holdings resulting in a single person or group obtaining a larger share of the company’s stock than we initially acquired. Accordingly, this may make it more likely that we will not be able to maintain our control of the target business.


Unlike many blank check companies, we do not have a specified maximum redemption threshold. The absence of such a redemption threshold will make it easier for us to consummate a business combination with which a substantial number of our stockholders do not agree.

Since we have no specified percentage threshold for redemption in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, our structure is different in this respect from the structure that has been used by many blank check companies. Many blank check companies would not be able to consummate a business combination if the holders of the company’s public shares voted against a proposed business combination and elected to redeem or convert more than a specified percentage of the shares sold in such company’s initial public offering, which percentage threshold has typically been between 19.99% and 39.99%. As a result, many blank check companies have been unable to complete business combinations because the amount of public shares for which conversion was elected exceeded the maximum conversion threshold pursuant to which such company could proceed with a business combination. However, we may be able to consummate a business combination even though a substantial number of our public stockholders do not agree with the transaction and have redeemed their shares or, if we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, if our initial holders, officers, directors or their affiliates have entered into privately negotiated agreements with public stockholders to acquire public shares. However, in no event will we redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 upon consummation of our initial business combination, and the amount that we redeem may be further limited by the terms and conditions of our initial business combination, which is the case with respect to the proposed Intermex transaction. In such case, we would not proceed with the redemption of our public shares and the related initial business combination, and instead may search for an alternate business combination.

The exercise price for the public warrants is higher than in many similar blank check company offerings in the past, and, accordingly, the warrants are more likely to expire worthless.

The exercise price of the warrants is higher than is typical in many similar blank check companies. Historically, the exercise price of a warrant was generally a fraction of the purchase price of the units in the initial public offering. The exercise price for our public warrants is $11.50 per whole share of common stock. As a result, the warrants are less likely to ever be in the money and more likely to expire worthless.

In order to effectuate a business combination, we may seek to amend provisions of our charter and other governing instruments. We cannot assure you that we will not seek to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or other governing instruments in a manner that will make it easier for us to consummate a business combination that our stockholders may not support.

In order to effectuate a business combination, blank check companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and other governing instruments. For example, blank check companies have amended the definition of initial business combination, increased redemption thresholds and changed industry focus. We cannot assure you that we will not seek to amend our charter or governing instruments in order to effectuate our initial business combination. However, if the effect of the proposed amendments would be either to (i) reduce the amount in the trust account available to redeeming stockholders to less than $10.00 per share, or (ii) delay the date on which a stockholder could otherwise redeem shares for the per share amountwe have issued more than $1.0 billion in the trust account and, if such amendments are approved by persons holding at least 65% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, we will provide a right for dissenting public stockholders to redeem their public shares, if such amendment is approved, in the same manner as if we were seeking a stockholder vote on a business combination except that the amount on deposit in the trust account for purposes of calculating the per share redemption price will be determined at the close of business two business days before the meeting date.

Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that relate to our pre-business combination activity (and corresponding provisions of the agreement governing the release of funds from our trust account) may be amended with the approval of holders owning 65% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock, which is a lower amendment threshold than that of many blank check companies. It may be easier for us, therefore, to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to facilitate the consummation of an initial business combination that our stockholders may not support.

Many blank check companies have a provision in their charter which prohibits the amendment of certain of its provisions, including those which relate to a company’s pre-business combination activity, without approval by a certain percentage of the company’s stockholders. Amendment of these provisions requires approval by between 90% and 100% of the company’s public stockholders in many cases. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that provisions related to pre-business combination activity may be amended if approved by holders owning 65% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock, and corresponding provisions of the trust agreement governing the release of funds from our trust account may be amended if approved by holders owning 65% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock (in each case including all shares held by the initial holders, holders of placement units, our officers and our directors); provided, however, that if the effect of any proposed amendment, if adopted, would be either to (i) reduce the amount in the trust account available to redeeming stockholders to less than $10.00 per share, or (ii) delay the date on which a public stockholder could otherwise redeem shares for such per share amount in the trust account, we will provide a right for dissenting public shareholders to redeem public shares if such an amendment is approved). As a result, we may be able to amend the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation which govern our pre-business combination actions more easily that many blank check companies, and this may increase our ability to consummate a business combination with which you do not agree.


Our initial holders, executive officers and directors have agreed, pursuant to a written agreement with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that would affect the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination by January 25, 2019 unless we provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their shares of common stock upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares. Our stockholders are not parties to, or third-party beneficiaries of, this written agreement with our initial holders, executive officers and directors and, as a result, will not have the ability to pursue remedies against these persons and entities for any breach of such agreement. Accordingly, in the event of a breach, our stockholders would need to pursue a stockholder derivative action, subject to applicable law.

We may be unable to obtain additional financing to complete our initial business combination or to fund the operations and growth of a target business, which could compel us to restructure or abandon a particular business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share on our redemption.

Because of the size of our initial business combination, the obligation to repurchase for cash a significant number of shares from stockholders who elect redemption in connection with our initial business combination, or the terms of negotiated transactions to purchase shares in connection with our initial business combination, we may be required to seek additional financing or to abandon the proposed business combination. We may be unable to obtain any necessary financing on acceptable terms, if at all. To the extent that additional financing proves to be unavailable when needed to consummate our initial business combination, we would be compelled to either restructure or abandon the transaction and seek an alternative target business candidate. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share on our redemption. In addition, even if we do not need additional financing to consummate our initial business combination, we may require such financing to fund the operations or growth of the target business. The failure to secure additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the continued development or growth of the target business. None of our officers, directors or stockholders is required to provide any financing to us after a business combination.

Holders of founder shares and purchasers of placement units will control a substantial interest in us and thus may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a stockholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support.

Holders of founder shares and purchasers of placements units may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a stockholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support, including amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Holders of founder or placement shares are not restricted from purchasing common stock in the aftermarket or in privately negotiated transactions, which would increase their control. Neither the holders of founder shares nor purchasers of placement units has any current intention to purchase additional securities, other than as disclosed in the initial public offering prospectus. Factors that would be considered in making such additional purchases would include consideration of the current trading price of our common stock. In addition, our board of directors, whose members were elected by our initial holders, is divided into two classes with only one class of directors being elected in each year and each class (except for those directors appointed prior to our first annual meeting of stockholders) serving a two-year term. We may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders to elect new directors prior to the consummation of our initial business combination, in which case all of the current directors will continue in office at least until the consummation of the business combination. If there is an annual meeting, as a consequence of our “staggered” board of directors, only a minority of the board of directors will be considered for election and our initial stockholders, because of its ownership position, will have considerable influence regarding the outcome. Accordingly, you should anticipate that holders of founder shares and purchasers of placement units will continue to exert control at least until the consummation of our initial business combination.


We may amend the terms of the warrants in a manner that may be adverse to holders with the approval by the holders of at least 65% of the then outstanding warrants.

Our warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and us. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least 65% of the then outstanding warrants to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the warrants in a manner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 65% of the then outstanding warrants approve of such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms of the warrants with the consent of at least 65% of the then outstanding warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the warrants, shorten the exercise period or decrease the number of shares of our common stock purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.

We may redeem your unexpired warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to you, thereby making your warrants worthless.

We have the ability to redeem outstanding warrants (excluding any placement warrants held by our sponsor or its permitted transferees) at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at $0.01 per warrant, provided that the last reported sales price (or the closing bid price of our common stock in the event the shares of our common stock are not traded on any specific trading day) of the common stock equals or exceeds $24.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period ending on the third business day prior to the date we send proper notice of such redemption, provided that on the date we give notice of redemption andnon-convertible debt during the entire period thereafter until the time we redeem the warrants, we have an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and a current prospectus relating to them is available. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. Redemption of the outstanding warrants could force you: (i) to exercise your warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for you to do so, (ii) to sell your warrants at the then-current market price when you might otherwise wish to hold your warrants or (iii) to accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of your warrants.

Our warrants may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and make it more difficult to effectuate a business combination.

Our sponsor has committed to loan us a maximum of $1,100,000 to fund working capital requirements or finance transaction costs in connection with an intended initial business combination, any portion or all of which may be converted, at the option of our sponsor, into additional warrants of the post-business combination entity at $0.75 per one-half of one warrant (warrants to purchase a maximum of 733,333 whole shares if the full $1,100,000 is loaned and that amount is converted into warrants).

To the extent we issue shares of common stock to effect a business combination, the potential for the issuance of a substantial number of additional shares of common stock upon exercise of these warrants could make us a less attractive acquisition vehicle to a target business. Such warrants, when exercised, will increase the number of issued and outstanding shares of our common stock and reduce the value of the shares of common stock issued to complete the business combination. Therefore, our warrants may make it more difficult to effectuate a business combination or increase the cost of acquiring the target business.

The placement warrants and any warrants to be issued to our sponsor upon its conversion of up to $1,100,000 in working capital loans are or would be identical to the warrants sold as part of the units in the initial public offering except that, so long as they are held by our sponsor or its permitted transferees, (a) they will not be redeemable by us, (b) they (including the common stock issuable upon exercise of these warrants) may not, subject to certain limited exceptions, be transferred, assigned or sold by the holders until 30 days after the consummation of our initial business combination and (c) they may be exercised by the holders on a cashless basis.


Because each unit contains one-half of one warrant and only a whole warrant may be exercised, the units may be worth less than units of other blank check companies.

Each unit contains one-half of one warrant. Because, pursuant to the warrant agreement, the warrants may only be exercised for a whole number of shares, only a whole warrant may be exercised at any given time. This is different from other blank check companies similar to ours whose units include one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase one whole share. We have established the components of the units in this way in order to reduce the dilutive effect of the warrants upon completion of a business combination since the warrants will be exercisable in the aggregate for one-half of the number of shares compared to units that each contain a warrant to purchase one whole share, thus making us, we believe, a more attractive business combination partner for target businesses. Nevertheless, this unit structure may cause our units to be worth less than if they included a warrant to purchase one whole share.

Nasdaq may delist our securities from trading which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our securities and subject us to additional trading restrictions.

We cannot assure you that our securities will continue to be listed on Nasdaq in the future or prior to a business combination. In order to continue listing our securities on Nasdaq prior to a business combination, we must maintain certain financial, distribution and stock price levels. Generally, we must maintain a minimum amount in stockholders’ equity (generally $2,500,000), a minimum number of public stockholders (generally 300 public holders), and a minimum number of shares held by non-affiliates (500,000 shares). Additionally, in connection with our business combination, it is likely that Nasdaq may require us to file a new initial listing application and meet its initial listing requirements which are more rigorous than Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements. We cannot assure you that we will be able to meet those initial listing requirements at that time.

If Nasdaq delists our securities from trading on its exchange and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities could be quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board or the “pink sheets.” If this were to occur, there could be material adverse consequences, including:

a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;

reduced liquidity for our securities;

a determination that our common stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our common stock to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our securities;

a limited amount of, or no, news and analyst coverage; and

a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.

The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.” Because our units, common stock and warrants are listed on Nasdaq, our units, common stock and warrants are covered securities. Although the states are preempted from regulating the sale of our securities, the federal statute does allow the states to investigate companies if there is a suspicion of fraud and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate or bar the sale of covered securities in a particular case. While we are not aware of a state, other than the state of Idaho, having used these powers to prohibit or restrict the sale of securities issued by blank check companies, certain state securities regulators view blank check companies unfavorably and might use these powers, or threaten to use these powers, to hinder the sale of securities of blank check companies in their states. Further, if we were no longer listed on Nasdaq, our securities would not be covered securities and we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities.

three-year period.

Purchases of common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions by our initial holders, directors, officers or their affiliates may make it difficult for us to continue to list our common stock on Nasdaq or another national securities exchange.

If our initial holders, directors, officers or their affiliates purchase shares of our common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, it would reduce the public “float” of our common stock and the number of beneficial holders of our common stock, which may make it difficult to maintain the listing or trading of our common stock on a national securities exchange if we determine to apply for such listing in connection with the business combination. If the number of our public holders falls below 300 or if the total number of shares held by non-affiliates is less than 500,000, we will be non-compliant with Nasdaq’s continued listing rules and our common stock could be de-listed. If our common stock were de-listed, we could face the material consequences set forth in the immediately preceding risk factor.

Because we must furnish our stockholders with target business financial statements, we may lose the ability to complete an otherwise advantageous initial business combination with some prospective target businesses.

If we hold a stockholder vote to approve our initial business combination, the federal proxy rules require that a proxy statement with respect to a vote on a business combination meeting certain financial significance tests include historical and/or pro forma financial statement disclosure in periodic reports. If we make a tender offer for our public shares, we will include the same financial statement disclosure in our tender offer documents that is required under the tender offer rules. These financial statements must be prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, and the historical financial statements must be audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), or PCAOB. These financial statement requirements may limit the pool of potential target businesses we may acquire because some targets may be unable to provide such statements in time for us to disclose such statements in accordance with federal proxy rules and consummate our initial business combination by January 25, 2019.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and divert management’s attention.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (which we refer to as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), the Dodd-Frank Act Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (which we refer to as the Dodd-Frank Act), the listing requirements of Nasdaq and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and increase demand on our systems and resources, particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company.” The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to meet this standard, significant resources and management oversight may be required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could adversely affect our business and operating results. We may need to hire more employees in the future or engage outside consultants to comply with these requirements, which will increase our costs and expenses.

In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be adversely affected.


However, for as long as we remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirement of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.”

We may remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years. If our non-convertible debt issued within a three year period or revenues exceeds $1 billion, or the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million on the last day of the second fiscal quarter of any given fiscal year, we would cease to be an emerging growth company as of the following fiscal year.

As an “emerging growth company,” we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Additionally, as an emerging growth company, we have elected to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As such, our consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with all public company accounting standards. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we maywill rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active market for our common stock, our share price may be more volatile and the price at which our securities trade could be less than if we did not use these exemptions.

Because we have no current plans to pay cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.
We have no current plans to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. The declaration, amount, and payment of any future dividends on shares of common stock will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors. Our board of directors may take into account general and economic conditions, our financial condition, and results of operations, our available cash and current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual, legal, tax, and regulatory restrictions, implications on the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to us, and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant. In addition, our ability to pay dividends is limited by covenants of our existing and outstanding indebtedness and may be limited by covenants of any future indebtedness we or our subsidiaries incur. As a result, you may not receive any return on an investment in our common stock unless you sell our common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.
Our ability to meet expectations and projections in any research or reports published by securities or industry analysts, or a lack of coverage by securities or industry analysts, could result in a depressed market price and limited liquidity for our common stock.
The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about us, our sharebusiness, our market, or our competitors. If no or few securities or industry analysts commence coverage of the Company, our stock price would likely be less than that which we would obtain if we had such coverage and the liquidity, or trading volume of our common stock may be more volatile.

Compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may makelimited, making it more difficult for usa stockholder to effectuate a business combination, require substantial financialsell shares at an acceptable price or amount. If any analysts do cover the Company, their projections may vary widely and management resources, and increasemay not accurately predict the time and costsresults we actually achieve. Our share price may decline if our actual results do not match the projections of completing an acquisition.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain a system of internal controls and that we evaluate and report on such system of internal controls. In addition, once we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” we must have our system of internal controls audited. The fact that we are a blank check company makes compliance with the requirementsresearch analysts covering us. Similarly, if one or more of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act particularly burdensomeanalysts who write reports on us as compareddowngrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our share price could decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to other public companies because a target company with which we seek to complete a business combination may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of its internal controls. The development of the internal controls of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete any such acquisition.

publish reports on us regularly, our share price or trading volume could decline.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporationcharter and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit the price investors might be willing to pay in the future for our common stock and could entrench management.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporationcharter contains provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that stockholders may consider to be in their best interests.opt out of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”). These provisions include a staggered board of directors and the ability of the board of directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred shares, which may make more
21

difficult the removal of management and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.

Risks applicable

In addition, while we have opted out of Section 203 of the DGCL, our charter contains similar provisions providing that we may not engage in certain “business combinations” with any “interested stockholder” for a three-year period following the time that the stockholder became an interested stockholder, unless:
prior to financial technology businesses

Business combinations with financial technology businesses may involve special considerations and risks. If we completesuch time, our initialboard of directors approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;

upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of our voting stock outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding certain shares; or
at or subsequent to that time, the business combination is approved by our board of directors and by the affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of our outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.
These anti-takeover defenses could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of us. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and cause us to take corporate actions other than those you desire.
Our charter designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for certain litigation that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with a financial technology business, weus.
Our charter provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be subjectthe sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed to us or our stockholders by any of our directors, officers, employees or agents, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us arising under the DGCL or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. The exclusive forum provision of our bylaws does not establish exclusive jurisdiction in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware for claims that arise under the Securities Act, the Exchange Act or other federal securities laws if there is exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction in the federal courts. By becoming our stockholder, you will be deemed to have notice of and have consented to the following risks, anyprovisions of our charter related to choice of forum. The choice of forum provision in our charter may limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us.
Because Stella Point controls a significant percentage of our common stock, it may influence our major corporate decisions and its interests may conflict with the interests of other holders of our common stock.
SPC Intermex, an affiliate of Stella Point, beneficially owns and has voting power over approximately 8.4% of our outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2020. Pursuant to the Shareholders Agreement, SPC Intermex has the right to designate eight of our directors until all the parties to the Shareholders Agreement hold, in aggregate, less than 10% of our outstanding common stock. SPC Intermex continues to be able to exert a significant degree of influence over the Company’s management and affairs and over matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and the approval of business combinations or dispositions and other extraordinary transactions. SPC Intermex also may have interests that differ from the interests of other holders of our common stock and may vote in a way with which couldyou disagree and which may be detrimentaladverse to your interests. The concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change of control of the Company and may materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock. In addition, Stella Point may in the future own businesses that directly compete with the business of the Company.
Certain of our directors have relationships with Stella Point, which may cause conflicts of interest with respect to our business.
As of the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, two of our eight directors are affiliated with Stella Point. Stella Point affiliated directors have fiduciary duties to us and, the business we acquire:

in addition, have duties to their respective funds. As a result, these directors may face real or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to matters affecting both us and their funds, whose interests may be adverse to ours in some circumstances.

We may be subject to claims from both the firms to whom we provide our productssecurities litigation, which is expensive and services and the clients they serve.

If the products or services we provide relate to the facilitation of financial transactions, such as funds or securities settlement systems, and a failure or compromise of our product or service results in loss to a customer or its clients, wecould divert management’s attention.

Our share price may be liable for such loss. The amount of the loss could be significantly greater that the revenues we derived from providing the product or service.

If we are unable to keep pace with evolving technologyvolatile and, changes in the financial services industry, our revenues and future prospects may decline.

We expectpast, companies that have experienced volatility in the markets for the products and servicesmarket price of any target business we acquire will likely be characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and evolving industry standards. The introduction of products and services embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards can render existing products and services obsolete and unmarketable in short periods of time.their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We expect new products and services, and enhancements to existing products and services, will be developed and introduced by others, which will compete with the products and services that we offer. Our success will depend upon our ability to enhance current products and services and to develop and introduce new products and services that keep pace with technological developments and emerging industry standards. If we are unable to develop and introduce new products and services or enhancements in a timely manner, or if a release of a new product or service does not achieve market acceptance, our revenues and future prospects may decline.

Our ability to provide financial technology products and services to customers may be reduced or eliminated by regulatory changes.

We expect that the customer base for our products or services will be principally banks and other financial institutions such as insurance companies and securities firms, alltarget of which are subject to extensive regulation. Any product or service we supply to these firms likely will be affected by and designed to comply with the customer’s regulatory environment. If the regulatory environment affecting a particular product or service changes, the product or service could become obsolete or unmarketable, or require extensive and expensive modification. As a result, regulatory changes may impair our revenues and our profitability. If we only provide a single product or service a changethis type of litigation in the applicable regulatory environment could cause a significant business interruption and lossfuture. Litigation of revenue until appropriate modifications are made. Moreover, if the regulatory change eliminates the need for the product or service, or if the expense of making necessary modifications exceeds our resources or available financing, we may be unable to continue in business.

Difficulties with any products or services we provide could damage our reputation and business.

We expect that market acceptance of our products and services will depend upon the reliable operation and security of our systems and their connection to the systems of our customers. Any operational or connectivity failures, system outages or security breaches would likely result in revenue loss to us until corrected andthis type could result in client dissatisfaction, causing them to terminate or reduce their business dealings with us. It may also damagesubstantial costs and diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, reputation, making it more difficult for us to obtain new customersfinancial condition and maintain or expand our business.

A failure to comply with privacy regulationsresults of operations. Any adverse determination in litigation could adversely affect relations with customers and have a negative impact on business.

Depending upon the type of financial technology business we acquire, in the course of providing services to our customers we may collect, process and retain sensitive and confidential information on our customers and their clients. A failure of our systems due to security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors, or other causes could result in the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential customer information. Any such failure could result in damage to our reputation with our customers, expose us to the risk of litigation and liability, disrupt our operations, and impair our ability to operate profitably.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property and we may be subject to infringement claims.

We expect to rely on a combination of contractual rights and copyright, trademark, patent and trade secret laws to establish and protect any proprietary technology of a target business. Although we intend to protect vigorously any intellectual property we acquire, third parties may infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property or may develop competitive technology. Our competitors may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products or services or design around our intellectual property rights. We may have to litigate to enforce and protect our intellectual property rights, trade secrets and know-how or to determine their scope, validity or enforceability, which is expensive, could cause a diversion of resources and may not prove successful. The loss of intellectual property protection or the inability to secure or enforce intellectual property protection could harm our business and ability to compete.

We also may be subject to claims by third parties for infringement of another party’s proprietary rights, or for breach of copyright, trademark or license usage rights. Any such claims and any resulting litigation could subject us to significant liabilityliabilities.

ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
22

Index

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES
Our leased corporate offices are located in Miami, Florida. In addition, we lease three other facilities in Miami, Florida. As of December 31, 2020, we lease 34 Company-operated stores all located in the United States. We have two international customer service centers located in Guatemala City, Guatemala and Puebla, Mexico where our employees answer operational questions from agents and customers.Our owned and leased facilities are used for damages. An adverse determinationoperational, sales and administrative purposes in anysupport of our business, and are all currently being utilized as intended.
We believe that our properties are sufficient to meet our current and projected business needs. We periodically review our facility requirements and may acquire new facilities, or modify, update, consolidate, dispose of or sublet existing facilities, based on evolving business needs.
ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are subject to various claims, charges and litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of this type could require usbusiness. We believe these actions are a normal incident of the nature and kind of business in which we are engaged. While it is not feasible to design around a third party’s intellectual property, obtain a license for that technology or license alternative technology from another party. Nonepredict the outcome of these alternatives may be available to us at a price which would allow us to operate profitably. In addition, litigation is time consuming and expensive to defend and could resultmatters with certainty, we do not believe that any asserted or unasserted legal claims or proceedings, individually or in the diversion of the timeaggregate, will have a material and attention of management and employees. Any claims from third parties may also result in limitationsadverse effect on our abilitybusiness, financial condition and results of operations.
Reference is made to useNote 17 – Commitments and Contingencies in the intellectual property subjectConsolidated Financial Statements of International Money Express, Inc. contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10–K for information regarding certain legal proceedings to these claims.

which we are a party, which information is incorporated by reference herein.

Item 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

Item 2.PROPERTIES.

We do not own any real estate or other physical properties. We currently maintain our executive offices at 2929 Arch Street, Suite 1703, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104. The cost

ITEM 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not Applicable.
23

Index
PART II
ITEM 5.     MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market for this space is being borne by an affiliate of our sponsor, without cost to us. We consider our current office space adequate for our current operations.

Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

To the knowledge of our management, there is no material litigation, arbitration or governmental proceeding currently pending against us or any members of our management team in their capacity as such.

Item 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

Company’s Common Stock

PART II

Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information

Our units commenced public trading on January 20, 2017, and our common stock and warrants commenced separate trading on March 13, 2017.  The common stock, warrants and units are each listedtrades on the NASDAQNasdaq Capital Market under the symbols FNTE, FNTEW and FNTEU, respectively.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales price for our units, common stock, and warrants for the periods presented. 

Quarter Ended Units  Common Stock  Warrants 
  Low  High  Low  High  Low  High 
March 31, 2017 $10.01  $12.10  $9.70  $11.75  $0.50  $4.00 
June 30, 2017 $10.15  $10.50  $9.73  $9.95  $1.00  $1.40 
September 30, 2017 $10.24  $10.58  $9.70  $11.76  $1.20  $1.95 
December 31, 2017 $10.25  $10.65  $9.70  $9.97  $1.20  $1.70 

Holders

On symbol “IMXI”.

As of March 12, 2018, the numbers5, 2021, there were 151 holders of record holders of our common stock.
Following the Company’s common stock, units and warrants were 13, 3 and 1, respectively, not including beneficial holders whose securities are held in street name.

Dividends

WeMerger, we have not declared or paid, and do not anticipate declaring or paying in the foreseeable future, any cash dividends on our common stock to date and do not intend to pay cash dividends prior tostock. In addition, the completion of an initial business combination. The payment of cash dividends in the future will depend upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial condition subsequent to completion of an initial business combination, and will be at the discretionterms of our board of directors at such time. In addition, our board of directors is not currently contemplating and does not anticipate declaring any stock dividends in the foreseeable future. Further, if we incur any indebtedness in connection with a business combination,credit facility include restrictions on our ability to declare dividends may be limited by restrictive covenants we may agree to in connection therewith.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity CompensationPlans

None.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.


Item 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table summarizes the relevant financial data for our business and should be read with our consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report. 

  December 31,
2017
  December 31,
2016
 
Income Statement Data:      
Loss from operations $(1,131,812) $(1,621)
Net loss  (185,347)  (1,621)
Basic and diluted loss per share  (0.02)  (0.00)
         
Balance Sheet Data:        
Cash $362,581  $82,614 
Cash and marketable securities held in Trust Account  175,883,186    
Total assets  176,259,327   470,536 
Common stock subject to possible redemption  161,127,060    
Total stockholders’ equity  5,000,008   21,192 

Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Annual Report. Certain information contained in the discussion and analysis set forth below includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Annual Report including, without limitation, statements under “Management’sissue dividends. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” regardingOperations — Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a discussion of our credit facilities’ restrictions on our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends or other payments to us. Any payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other factors, the Company’s earnings, financial position, business strategycondition, current and anticipated capital requirements, plans for expansion, level of indebtedness and contractual restrictions. The payment of future cash dividends, if any, would be made only from assets legally available.

Equity Compensation Plan Information
The information required by Item 5 with respect to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference to Part III, Item 12 of this Form 10-K.
Performance Graph
The Company’s peer group (“Peer Group”) consists of publicly-traded companies that are in the plansmoney remittance and objectivespayment industries and is comprised of managementthe following: MoneyGram, Euronet, and Western Union.
The following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return, calculated on a dividends reinvested basis, for future operations, are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based(1) the Company’s common stock, (2) the Total Return Index for U.S. Companies traded on the beliefsNasdaq Global Select Market (“CRSP NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies)”) and (3) our Peer Group, for the period from July 27, 2018 (the first day our common stock was separately traded) through December 31, 2020. The graph assumes the value of management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, the Company’s management. Actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors detailedinvestment in our filingscommon stock and each index was $100 on July 27, 2018 and that all dividends were reinvested. We have not paid any cash dividends and, therefore, the cumulative total return calculation for us is based solely upon stock price appreciation and not upon reinvestment of cash dividends. Historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.,
NASDAQ INDEX AND PEER GROUP INDEX

imxi-20201231_g1.gif

The following table is a summary of the monthly cumulative total return for the day our stock began trading on the Nasdaq through each of the dates shown below:
7/27/20189/30/201812/31/20183/31/20196/30/20199/30/201912/31/20193/31/20206/30/20209/30/202012/31/2020
IMXI100120.20119.60116.60141.00137.40120.4091.30124.60143.65155.20
NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies)100104.5086.94100.98105.35105.68118.33102.60133.26148.15170.32
Peer Group10098.7692.46112.47127.38130.10145.3190.61107.00105.02130.19

NOTE: Index Data: Calculated (or Derived) based from CRSP NASDAQ Stock Market (US Companies), Center for Research in Security Prices (CRSP®), Graduate School of Business, The University of Chicago. Copyright 2021. Used with permission. All rights reserved.
NOTE: Corporate Performance Graph with peer group uses peer group only performance (excludes only company).
The graph is furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC.

The following discussionSEC or subject to Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and analysisis not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Repurchases of Equity Securities of the Issuer
During the quarter ended December 31, 2020, we did not repurchase any of our financial conditionoutstanding securities.
24

Index
ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Reserved.
25

Index
ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Management’s Discussion and resultsAnalysis of operationsFinancial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statementsour Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto containedrelated Notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Certain information contained in the discussion and analysis set forth below includesReport on Form 10-K. This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.

The forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections about our industry, business and future financial results. Our actual results could differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed in other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for additional factors relating to such statements and see “Risk Factors” included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Past operating results are not necessarily indicative of operating results in any future periods.

COVID-19 Update
During March 2020, a global pandemic was declared by the World Health Organization related to the rapidly growing outbreak of a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”). The pandemic has had and continues to have a significant effect on economic conditions in the United States of America (“United States” or “U.S.”), as the efforts of federal, state, local and foreign governments to react to the public health crisis with mitigation measures have created and continue to cause significant uncertainties in the U.S. and global economy. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic affects our business, operations and financial results depends, and will continue to depend, on numerous evolving factors that we may not be able to accurately predict such as further government and health authorities restrictions, progress in and effectiveness of vaccination efforts in the United States or in the countries in which we operate and conduct business.
In response to the pandemic, our top priority has been to take appropriate actions to protect the health and safety of our employees. We have adjusted standard operating procedures within our business operations to ensure continued worker safety, and are continually monitoring evolving health guidelines and responding to changes as appropriate. These procedures include reconfiguring facilities to reduce employee density, expanded and more frequent cleaning within facilities, implementation of appropriate and mandated distancing programs, employee temperature monitoring and requiring use of certain personal protective equipment at our U.S. headquarters and call centers in Mexico and Guatemala. As of December 31, 2020, all of our facilities are open and operating with adjustments to ensure social distancing and facial covering requirements established by state and local regulations.
Notwithstanding the operational challenges created by these measures, our business continues to function and, to date, our customer service has not been adversely affected in any material respect. Despite these efforts, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose the risk that we or our employees, sending and paying agents, as well as consumers and their beneficiaries, are or may become further restricted from conducting business activities, partially or completely, for an indefinite period of time, including due to shutdowns requested or mandated by governmental authorities or imposed by our management, or that the pandemic may otherwise interrupt or impair business activities. These risks could be magnified if the recent resurgence of COVID-19 illnesses continues or is not adequately contained and governmental authorities once again impose restrictions on commercial and social activities or businesses that employ our customers take actions that adversely affect the incomes of those employees.
The operational changes noted above had only a limited effect on the Company’s financial results. Although we saw a slight year-over-year decrease in our volume of transactions at the beginning of the pandemic, the year ended December 31, 2020 has shown a year-over-year increase in both dollar volume and transactions, including all-time highs for one-month sales in August and again in October, as well as a quarterly record for sales in the fourth quarter of 2020. The economic effects of the pandemic caused increased foreign exchange volatility, particularly with respect to the Mexican peso, which has created additional operational challenges; however, the overall effect on our results of operations to date has been positive. Despite positive trends during the second half of the year, we continue to monitor this evolving pandemic and its potential effects on the Company’s operations.
Although governmental authorities took measures that restricted the normal course of operations of businesses and consumers that were in place for much of the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company and our sending agents are considered essential businesses under current governmental guidance and such measures did not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company’s business is dependent upon the willingness and ability of its employees, network of agents and consumers to conduct money transfer services and the ultimate effects of the economic disruption caused by the pandemic and responses thereto. Although the Company’s operations continued effectively despite social distancing and other measures taken in response to the pandemic, the ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows is subject to future developments, including the duration of the pandemic and the related extent of its severity, as well as its impact on the economic conditions, particularly the level of unemployment of our customers, which remain uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time. If the global response to contain and remedy the COVID-19 pandemic escalates further or is unsuccessful, or if governmental decisions to ease pandemic related restrictions are ineffective, premature or counterproductive, the Company could experience a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
26

Further quantification and discussion of these pandemic related effects, to the extent relevant and material, are included in the discussion of results of operations below.
Overview

We are a blank checkrapidly growing and leading money remittance services company incorporatedfocused primarily on May 28, 2015the United States to Latin America and the Caribbean (“LAC”) corridor, which includes Mexico, Central and South America and the Caribbean. In 2019, we expanded our services to allow remittances to Africa from the United States and also began offering sending services from Canada to Latin America and Africa. We utilize our proprietary technology to deliver convenient, reliable and value-added services to our customers through a broad network of sending and paying agents. Our remittance services, which include a comprehensive suite of ancillary financial processing solutions and payment services, are available in all 50 states in the U.S., Washington D.C., Puerto Rico and 13 provinces in Canada, where customers can send money to beneficiaries in 17 LAC countries, seven countries in Africa and two countries in Asia. Our services are accessible in person through over 100,000 independent sending and paying agents and 34 Company-operated stores, as well as online and via Internet-enabled mobile devices. Additionally, we have expanded our product and service portfolio to include online payment options, pre-paid debit cards and direct deposit payroll cards, which may present different cost, demand, regulatory and risk profiles relative to our core remittance business.
Money remittance services to LAC countries, primarily Mexico and Guatemala, are the primary source of our revenue. These services involve the movement of funds on behalf of an originating customer for receipt by a designated beneficiary at a designated receiving location. Our remittances to LAC countries are primarily generated in the United States by customers with roots in Latin American and Caribbean countries, many of whom do not have an existing relationship with a traditional full-service financial institution capable of providing the services we offer. We provide these customers with flexibility and convenience to help them meet their financial needs. We believe many of our customers who use our services may have access to traditional banking services, but prefer to use our services based on reliability, convenience and value. We generate money remittance revenue from fees paid by our customers (i.e., the senders of funds), which we share with our sending agents in the originating country and our paying agents in the destination country. Remittances paid in local currencies that are not pegged to the U.S. dollar can also generate revenue through if we are successful in our daily management of currency exchange spreads.
Our money remittance services enable our customers to send funds through our broad network of locations in the United States and Canada that are primarily operated by third-party businesses, as well as through our Company-operated stores. Transactions are processed and payment is collected by our agent (“sending agent(s)”) and those funds become available for pickup by the beneficiary at the designated destination, usually within minutes, at any Intermex payer location (“paying agent(s)”). We refer to our sending agents and our paying agents collectively as agents. In addition, our services are offered digitally through Intermexonline.com and via Internet-enabled mobile devices. During the three years ended December 31, 2020, we have grown our agent network by approximately 40% and increased our remittance transactions volume by more than 33%. In 2020, we processed approximately 32 million remittances, representing over 12% growth in transactions as compared to 2019.
As a non-bank financial institution in the United States, we are regulated by the Department of Treasury, the Internal Revenue Service, FinCEN, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), the Department of Banking and Finance of the State of Florida and additionally by the various regulatory institutions of those states in which we hold an operating license. We are duly registered as a Delaware corporation formedMoney Service Business (“MSB”) with FinCEN, the financial intelligence unit of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. We are also subject to a wide range of regulations in the United States and other countries, including anti-money laundering laws and regulations; financial services regulations; currency control regulations; anti-bribery laws; money transfer and payment instrument licensing laws; escheatment laws; privacy, data protection and information security laws, such as the Graham-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”); and consumer disclosure and consumer protection laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”).
Key Factors and Trends Affecting our Business
Various trends and other factors have affected and may continue to affect our business, financial condition and operating results, including, but not limited to:
the COVID-19 pandemic, responses thereto and the economic and market effects thereof, including unemployment levels and increased capital market volatility;
competition in the markets in which we operate;
volatility in foreign exchange rates that could affect the volume of consumer remittance activity and/or affect our foreign exchange related gains and losses;
cyber-attacks or disruptions to our information technology, computer network systems and data centers;
our ability to maintain banking relationships necessary for us to conduct our business;
27

Index
credit risks from our agents and the financial institutions with which we do business;
bank failures, sustained financial illiquidity, or illiquidity at our clearing, cash management or custodial financial institutions;
new technology or competitors that disrupt the current ecosystem by introducing digital platforms;
our ability to satisfy our debt obligations and remain in compliance with our credit facility requirements;
interest rate risk from elimination of LIBOR as a benchmark interest rate;
our success in developing and introducing new products, services and infrastructure;
customer confidence in our brand and in consumer money transfers generally;
our ability to maintain compliance with the regulatory requirements of the jurisdictions in which we operate or plan to operate;
international political factors or implementation of tariffs, border taxes or restrictions on remittances or transfers of money out of the United States and Canada;
changes in U.S. tax laws;
political instability, currency restrictions and volatility in countries in which we operate or plan to operate;
consumer fraud and other risks relating to customer authentication;
weakness in U.S. or international economic conditions;
changes in immigration laws and their enforcement;
our ability to protect our brand and intellectual property rights; and
our ability to retain key personnel.
Throughout 2020, Latin American political and economic conditions have remained unstable, as evidenced by high unemployment rates in key markets, currency reserves, currency controls, restricted lending activity, weak currencies, low consumer confidence, some of which reflect the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, among other factors. Specifically, continued political and economic unrest in parts of Mexico and some countries in South America contributed to volatility. Our business has generally been resilient during times of economic instability as money remittances are essential to many recipients, with the funds used by the receiving parties for their daily needs; however, long-term sustained appreciation of the Mexican peso or Guatemalan quetzal as compared to the U.S. Dollar could negatively affect our revenues and profitability.
Money remittance businesses have continued to be subject to strict legal and regulatory requirements, and we continue to focus on and regularly review our compliance programs. In connection with these reviews, and in light of regulatory complexity and heightened attention of governmental and regulatory authorities related to cybersecurity and compliance activities, we have made, and continue to make, enhancements to our processes and systems designed to detect and prevent cyber-attacks, consumer fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing and other illicit activities, along with enhancements to improve consumer protection, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and similar regulations outside the United States. In coming periods, we expect these enhancements will continue to result in changes to certain of our business practices and may result in increased costs.
We maintain a regulatory compliance department, under the direction of our Chief Compliance Officer, whose responsibility is to monitor transactions, detect suspicious activity, maintain financial records and train our employees and agents. An independent third-party consulting firm periodically reviews our policies and procedures to ensure the efficacy of our anti-money laundering and regulatory compliance program.
The market for money remittance services is very competitive. Our competitors include a small number of large money remittance providers, financial institutions, banks and a large number of small niche money remittance service providers that serve select regions. We compete with larger companies, such as Western Union, MoneyGram and Euronet, and a number of other smaller MSB entities. We generally compete for money remittance agents on the basis of value, service, quality, technical and operational differences, commission structure and marketing efforts. As a philosophy, we sell credible solutions to our sending agents, not discounts or higher commissions, as is typical for the purposeindustry. We compete for money remittance customers on the basis of effectingtrust, convenience, service, efficiency of outlets, value, technology and brand recognition.
28

Index
We have encountered and continue to expect to encounter increasing competition as new electronic platforms emerge that enable customers to send and receive money through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similarvariety of channels, but we do not expect adoption rates to be as significant in the near term for the customer segment we serve. Regardless, we continue to innovate in the industry by differentiating our money remittance business combination with one or more businesses (a “Business Combination”). through programs to foster loyalty among agents as well as customers and have expanded our channels through which our services are accessed to include online and mobile offerings which are experiencing customer adoption.
We intendqualify as an “emerging growth company” pursuant to use cashthe provisions of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), enacted on April 5, 2012. An “emerging growth company” can take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies.” These provisions include:
an exemption from the proceedsauditor attestation requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the assessment of the emerging growth company’s internal control over financial reporting;
an exemption from the adoption of new or revised financial accounting standards until they would apply to private companies; and
an exemption from compliance with any new requirements adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board requiring mandatory audit firm rotation or communication of Critical Audit Matters (“CAMs”) in the auditor’s report. A CAM is defined as any matter arising from the audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements; and (2) involves especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment.

We will remain an “emerging growth company” until the earlier of (1) the earliest of the last day of the fiscal year (a) following January 19, 2022, the fifth anniversary of us becoming a publicly-traded company, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our Initial Public Offering andcommon stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700.0 million as of the private placementlast business day of our Unitsprior second fiscal quarter, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. As of June 30, 2020, the market value of our common stock that occurred simultaneouslyis held by non-affiliates approximated $307.5 million.

The Merger
As discussed in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Merger was completed on July 26, 2018 (the “Closing Date”) and was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization where FinTech was treated as the “acquired” company for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, the Merger was treated as the equivalent of Intermex issuing stock for the net assets of FinTech, accompanied by a recapitalization. The net assets of FinTech were stated at historical cost, with no goodwill or other intangible assets resulting from the Merger. The consolidated assets, liabilities and results of operations prior to the Closing Date of the Merger are those of Intermex, and FinTech’s assets, liabilities and results of operations are consolidated with Intermex beginning on the Closing Date. The shares and corresponding capital amounts included in common stock and additional paid-in capital, pre-merger, have been retroactively restated as shares reflecting the exchange ratio in the Merger for all periods. The historical financial information and operating results of FinTech prior to the Merger have not been separately presented in this Annual Report as they were not significant or meaningful.

In connection with the closing of the Merger, FinTech redeemed a total of 4.9 million shares of its common stock at a redemption price of $10.086957 per share, resulting in a total payment to redeemed stockholders of approximately $49.8 million. The aggregate consideration paid in the Merger consisted of approximately (i) $102.0 million in cash and (ii) 17.2 million shares of FinTech common stock.

After the completion of the transactions on the Closing Date, there were 36.2 million shares of International Money Express, Inc. outstanding common stock, warrants to purchase 9 million shares of common stock (“Warrants”) and 3.4 million shares reserved for issuance under the International Money Express, Inc. 2018 Equity Compensation Plan, of which stock options to purchase 2.8 million shares of common stock and restricted stock units in respect of 21.2 thousand shares of common stock were granted to employees and independent directors of the Company in connection with the completion of the Initial Public Offeringtransaction. All of the Warrants were eliminated following the Closing Date through a tender offer and mandatory conversion that resulted in the issuance, between April and May of 2019, of approximately 1.8 million shares of common stock and the payment by the Company of approximately $10.0 million in cash in exchange for the Warrants tendered in the tender offer (the “Private Placement”“Warrants Offer”). These transactions resulted in the Company having a total of approximately 38.0 million shares of Common Stock outstanding following the issuance.

Secondary Offerings
In September 2020 and September 2019, the Company conducted underwritten secondary public offerings in which certain selling stockholders sold an aggregate of 5.7 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a price to the public of $13.50 per share and 6.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a price to the public of $12.75 per share, respectively. The Company did not receive any proceeds from these sales of common stock.
29

Index
How We Assess the Performance of Our Business
In assessing the performance of our business, we consider a variety of performance and financial measures. The key indicators of the financial condition and operating performance of our business are revenues, service charges from agents and banks, salaries and benefits, other selling, general and administrative expenses and net income. To help us assess our performance with these key indicators, we use Adjusted net income, Adjusted earnings per share and Adjusted EBITDA as non-GAAP financial measures. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide useful information to investors and expanded insight to measure our revenue and cost performance as a supplement to our U.S. GAAP consolidated financial statements. See the “Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings per Share” and “Adjusted EBITDA” sections below for reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to net income and earnings per share, our closest GAAP measures.
Revenues
Transaction volume is the primary generator of revenue in our business. Revenue on transactions is derived primarily from transaction fees paid by customers to transfer money. Revenues per transaction vary based upon send and receive locations and the amount sent. In certain transactions involving different send and receive currencies, we generate foreign exchange gains based on the difference between the set exchange rate charged by us to the sender and the rate available to us in the wholesale foreign exchange market.
Operating Expenses
Service Charges from Agents and Banks
Service charges and fees primarily consist of agent commissions and bank fees. Service charges and fees vary based on agent commission percentages and the amount of fees charged by the banks. Sending agents earn a commission on each transaction they process of approximately 50% of the transaction fee. Service charges and fees may increase if banks or payer organizations increase their fee structure or sending agents use higher fee methods to remit funds to us. Service charges also vary based on the method the customer selects to send the transfer and the payer organization that facilitates the transaction.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits include cash and share-based compensation associated with our corporate employees and sales team as well as employees at our Company-operated stores. Corporate employees include management, customer service, compliance, information technology, finance and human resources. Our sales team, located throughout the United States and Canada, is focused on supporting and growing our sending agent network. Share-based compensation is recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period; unrecognized compensation expense related to options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) of approximately $6.3 million is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
Other Selling, General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses primarily consist of fixed overhead expenses associated with our operations, such as information technology, rent, insurance, professional services, non-income taxes, facilities maintenance and other similar types of expenses. A portion of these expenses relate to our Company-operated stores; however, the majority relate to the overall business and compliance requirements of a regulated publicly traded financial services company. Selling expenses include expenses such as advertising and promotion, provision for bad debt and expenses associated with increasing our network of agents. These expenses are expected to continue to increase at a slower pace than our increase in revenues.
Transaction Costs
We incurred transaction costs associated with the Merger in 2018. These costs included all internal and external costs directly related to the transaction, consisting primarily of legal, consulting, accounting, advisory fees and certain incentive bonuses. Due to their significance, they are presented separately in our consolidated financial statements. There were no similar transaction costs incurred in 2020 and 2019.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation largely consists of depreciation of computer equipment and software that supports our technology platform. Amortization of intangible assets is primarily related to our agent relationships, trade name and developed technology.
30

Index
Non-Operating Expenses
Interest Expense
Interest expense consists primarily of interest associated with our debt, which consists of a term loan and revolving credit facility. The effective interest rates for the year ended December 31, 2020 for the term loan facility and revolving credit facility were 5.78% and 1.00%, our capital stock, debtrespectively. Interest on the term loan and revolving credit facilities is determined by reference to either LIBOR or a combination“base rate”, in each case, plus an applicable margin of cash,4.50% per annum for LIBOR loans or 3.50% per annum for base rate loans. The Company is also required to pay a fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility equal to 0.35% per annum.
Income tax provision
Our income tax provision includes the expected benefit of all deferred tax assets, including our net operating loss carryforwards. With few exceptions, our net operating loss carryforwards will expire from 2029 through 2037. After consideration of all evidence, both positive and negative, management has determined that no valuation allowance is required at December 31, 2020 on the Company’s U.S. federal or state deferred tax assets; however, a valuation allowance of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2020 has been recorded on deferred tax assets associated with Canadian net operating loss carryforwards. Our income tax provision reflects the effects of state taxes, non-deductible expenses, share-based compensation expenses, and foreign tax rates applicable to the Company’s foreign subsidiaries that are higher or lower than the U.S. statutory rate. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted in December 2017, reduced our federal corporate tax rate from 34% to 21% beginning in 2018.
Net Income (Loss)
Net income (loss) is determined by subtracting operating and non-operating expenses from revenues.
Earnings (Loss) per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for each period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding for each period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if outstanding stock options and debtwarrants at the presented dates are exercised and shares of restricted stock have vested, using the treasury stock method.
Segments
Our business is organized around one reportable segment that provides money transmittal services between the United States and Canada to effectuateMexico, Guatemala and other countries in Latin America, Africa and Asia through a network of authorized agents located in various unaffiliated retail establishments and 34 Company-operated stores throughout the U.S. and Canada. This is based on the objectives of the business and how our initial Business Combination. We have until January 25,chief operating decision maker, the CEO and President, monitors operating performance and allocates resources.
31

Index
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes key components of our results of operations for the periods indicated:

Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except for share data)202020192018
Revenues:
Wire transfer and money order fees, net$307,909 $273,081 $232,380 
Foreign exchange gain, net46,763 44,268 39,765 
Other income2,537 2,252 1,756 
Total revenues357,209 319,601 273,901 
Operating expenses:
Service charges from agents and banks238,597 212,670 182,471 
Salaries and benefits32,831 30,705 32,926 
Other selling, general and administrative expenses22,086 27,095 19,442 
Transaction costs— — 10,319 
Depreciation and amortization10,828 12,689 15,671 
Total operating expenses304,342 283,159 260,829 
Operating income52,867 36,442 13,072 
Interest expense6,566 8,510 18,448 
Income (loss) before income taxes46,301 27,932 (5,376)
Income tax provision12,517 8,323 1,868 
Net income (loss)$33,784 $19,609 $(7,244)

Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Revenues
Revenues for the above periods are presented below:
Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)2020% of
Revenues
2019% of
Revenues
Revenues:
Wire transfer and money order fees, net$307,909 86 %$273,081 85 %
Foreign exchange gain, net46,763 13 %44,268 14 %
Other income2,537 %2,252 %
Total revenues$357,209 100 %$319,601 100 %
Wire transfer and money order fees, net of $307.9 million, for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased by $34.8 million from $273.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. This increase of $34.8 million was primarily due to a 18% increase in transaction volume largely due to the continued growth in our agent network, which grew by 5% from December 2019 to consummateDecember 2020.
Revenues from foreign exchange gain, net of $46.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased by $2.5 million from $44.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. This increase was primarily due to higher transaction volume achieved by growth in our initial Business Combination. If we do not consummateagent network and a higher average amount sent by our customers as a result of increased foreign exchange volatility during the year.
32

Index
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the above periods are presented below:
Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)2020% of
Revenues
2019% of
Revenues
Operating expenses:
Service charges from agents and banks$238,597 67 %$212,670 67 %
Salaries and benefits32,831 %30,705 10 %
Other selling, general and administrative expenses22,086 %27,095 %
Depreciation and amortization10,828 %12,689 %
Total operating expenses$304,342 85 %$283,159 89 %
Service charges from agents and banks— Service charges from agents and banks were $238.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to $212.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase of $25.9 million, or 12%, was primarily due to the increase in transaction volume described above.
Salaries and benefits— Salaries and benefits were $32.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, which represented an initial Business Combinationincrease of $2.1 million from $30.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase of $2.1 million is primarily due to $1.9 million in increased wages, largely in management and other areas, to support the continued growth of our business and $0.6 million increase in share-based compensation. These increases are partially offset by January 25,a $0.4 million decrease in commission expense for our representatives primarily due to a lower than expected gross margin achieved compared to established goals.
Other selling, general and administrative expenses— Other selling, general and administrative expenses of $22.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 decreased by $5.0 million from $27.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The decrease was the result of:
$3.7 million - nonrecurrence of settlement and legal fees associated with a Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”) class action lawsuit in 2019;
$1.2 million - primarily lower legal and professional fees in connection with the 2020 secondary offering of the Company’s common stock as compared to the 2019 we will distributefees, as well as the aggregate amount then on depositfees related to the Warrants Offer in 2019;
$1.1 million - decrease in travel expenses due to reduced employee travel due to the COVID-19 pandemic; and
$0.9 million - reduction in advertising and promotion expense due to a change in marketing strategy.

These decreases were partially offset by:

$1.0 million - higher IT related expenses incurred to sustain our business expansion;
$0.4 million - higher rent and other operating expenses;
$0.3 million - loss incurred in the Trust Accountclosure of a financial institution in Mexico; and
$0.2 million - higher provision for bad debt as a result of higher account receivable balances due to the increase in volume.

Depreciation and amortization— Depreciation and amortization of $10.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 decreased by $1.9 million from $12.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. This decrease is mainly due to $2.4 million less amortization related to the trade name, developed technology and agent relationships during the year ended December 31, 2020 as these intangibles are being amortized on an accelerated basis, which declines over time. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in depreciation of $0.5 million associated primarily with additional computer equipment to support our growing business and agent network.
Non-Operating Expenses
Interest expense— Interest expense was $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, a decrease of $1.9 million from $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in interest rates paid under the Credit Agreement (as defined below) and lower drawings under the revolving credit facility.
Income tax provision— Income tax provision was $12.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of $4.2 million from an income tax provision of $8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase in the income tax provision was mainly attributable to higher taxable income resulting from higher revenues.

33

Index
Net Income
We reported net income of $33.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to net income of $19.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, which resulted in an increase of $14.2 million due to the same factors discussed above.
Earnings per Share
Earnings per Share - Basic for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $0.89, representing an increase of $0.37, or 71.2%, pro ratacompared to $0.52 for the year ended December 31, 2019 due to the same factors discussed above.
Earnings per Share - Diluted for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $0.88, representing an increase of $0.36, or 69.2%, compared to $0.52 for the year ended December 31, 2019 due to the same factors discussed above.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Earnings Per Share and Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate our performance, both internally and as compared with our peers, because these measures exclude certain items that may not be indicative of our core operating results, as well as items that can vary widely among companies within our industry. For example, non-cash compensation costs can be subject to volatility from changes in the market price per share of our common stock or variations in the value and number of shares granted, and amortization of intangible assets is subject to acquisition activity, which varies from period to period and amortization of intangibles expense is primarily related to the effects of push down accounting resulting from acquisitions.
We present these non-GAAP financial measures because we believe they are frequently used by analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate companies in our industry. Furthermore, we believe they are helpful in highlighting trends in our operating results by focusing on our core operating results and are useful to evaluate our performance in conjunction with our GAAP financial measures. Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted Earnings Per Share and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income, net income or earnings per share as a measure of operating performance or cash flows or as a measure of liquidity. Non-GAAP financial measures are not necessarily calculated the same way by different companies and should not be considered a substitute for or superior to GAAP measures.
Adjusted EBITDA is one of the primary metrics used by management to evaluate the financial performance of our business because it excludes, among other things, the effects of certain transactions that are outside the control of management, while other measures can differ significantly depending on long-term strategic decisions regarding capital structure, the jurisdictions in which we operate and capital investments.
In particular, Adjusted EBITDA is subject to certain limitations, including the following:
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect interest expense, or the amounts necessary to service interest or principal payments on our Credit Agreement;
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect income tax provision (benefit), and because the payment of taxes is part of our operations, tax provision is a necessary element of our costs and ability to operate;
Although depreciation and amortization are eliminated in the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any costs of such replacements;
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the noncash component of share-based compensation;
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the impact of earnings or charges resulting from matters we consider not to be reflective, on a recurring basis, of our ongoing operations; and
other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA or similarly titled measures differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.
We adjust for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA, as well as our other non-GAAP financial measures, only as supplemental information.


34

Index
Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings per Share
Adjusted Net Income is defined as net income adjusted to add back certain charges and expenses, such as non-cash amortization of intangible assets resulting from push-down accounting, which will recur in future periods until these assets have been fully amortized, and excludes the amortization of other intangible assets related to the acquisition of Company-operated stores, non-cash compensation costs, litigation settlements and other items set forth in the table below, as these charges and expenses are not considered a part of our core business operations and are not an indicator of ongoing, future company performance.
Adjusted Earnings per Share - Basic and Diluted is calculated by dividing Adjusted Net Income by GAAP weighted-average common shares outstanding (basic and diluted).
Adjusted Net Income for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $42.3 million, representing an increase of $9.7 million, or 30.0%, from Adjusted Net Income of $32.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase in Adjusted Net Income was primarily due to the increase in revenues of $37.6 million, offset primarily by an increase in service charges from agents and banks of $25.9 million due to higher transaction volume.
The following table presents the reconciliation of Net Income, our closest GAAP measure, to Adjusted Net Income:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except for share data)20202019
Net Income$33,784 $19,609 
Adjusted for:
Share-based compensation (a)3,237 2,609 
Offering costs (b)509 1,669 
TCPA Settlement (c)60 3,736 
Loss on bank closure (d)252 — 
Other employee severance (e)— 172 
Other charges and expenses (f)637 305 
Amortization of intangibles (g)6,841 9,248 
Income tax benefit related to adjustments (h)(2,981)(4,789)
Adjusted Net Income$42,339 $32,559 
Adjusted Earnings per share
Basic$1.11 $0.87 
Diluted$1.10 $0.87 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
Basic38,060,290 37,428,345 
Diluted38,358,171 37,594,158 

(a)Stock options and restricted stock were granted to employees and independent directors of the Company.
(b)Represents expenses incurred for professional and legal fees in connection with secondary offerings for the Company’s common stock and Warrants Offer.
(c)Represents legal fees and charge for the settlement of a class action lawsuit related to the TCPA.
(d)Represents a loss incurred in 2020 related to the closure of a financial institution in Mexico.
(e)Represents severance costs incurred during 2019 related to departmental changes.
(f)Includes loss on disposal of fixed assets and foreign currency (gains) losses.
(g)Represents the amortization of certain intangible assets that resulted from the application of push-down accounting.
(h)Represents the current and deferred tax impact of the taxable adjustments to net income using the Company’s blended federal and state tax rate for each period. Relevant tax-deductible adjustments include all adjustments to net income.

35

Index
Adjusted Earnings per Share - Basic (previously defined and used as described above) for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $1.11, representing an increase of $0.24, or 27.6%, compared to $0.87 for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Adjusted Earnings per Share - Diluted (previously defined and used as described above) for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $1.10, representing an increase of $0.23, or 26.4%, compared to $0.87 for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The following table presents the reconciliation of GAAP Earnings per Share, our closest GAAP measure, to Adjusted Earnings per Share:
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
BasicDilutedBasic and Diluted
GAAP Earnings per Share$0.89 $0.88 $0.52 
Adjusted for:
Share-based compensation0.09 0.08 0.07 
Offering costs0.01 0.01 0.04 
TCPA settlementNMNM0.10 
Loss on bank closure0.01 0.01 — 
Other employee severance— — NM
Other charges and expenses0.02 0.02 0.01 
Amortization of intangibles0.18 0.18 0.25 
Income tax benefit related to adjustments(0.08)(0.08)(0.13)
Adjusted Earnings per Share$1.11 $1.10 $0.87 

NM - Per share amounts are not meaningful.
The table above may contain slight summation differences due to rounding.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income before depreciation and amortization, interest expense, income taxes, and also adjusted to add back certain charges and expenses, such as non-cash compensation costs and other items set forth in the table below, as these charges and expenses are not considered a part of our core business operations and are not an indicator of ongoing, future company performance.
Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $68.4 million, representing an increase of $10.8 million, or 18.7%, from $57.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to the increase in revenues of $37.6 million, offset by an increase in service charges from agents and banks of $25.9 million due to an increase in volume transaction as well as increases in other operating expenses to support the growth in our business.
The following table presents the reconciliation of Net Income, our closest GAAP measure, to Adjusted EBITDA:
36

Index

Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)20202019
Net Income$33,784 $19,609 
Adjusted for:
Interest expense6,566 8,510 
Income tax provision12,517 8,323 
Depreciation and amortization10,828 12,689 
EBITDA63,695 49,131 
Share-based compensation (a)3,237 2,609 
Offering costs (b)509 1,669 
TCPA Settlement (c)60 3,736 
Loss on bank closure (d)252 — 
Other employee severance (e)— 172 
Other charges and expenses (f)637 305 
Adjusted EBITDA$68,390 $57,622 
(a)Stock options and restricted stock were granted to employees and independent directors of the Company.
(b)Represents expenses incurred for professional and legal fees in connection with secondary offerings for the Company’s common stock and Warrants Offer.
(c)Represents legal fees and charge for the settlement of a class action lawsuit related to the TCPA.
(d)Represents a loss incurred in 2020 related to the closure of a financial institution in Mexico.
(e)Represents severance costs incurred during 2019 related to departmental changes
(f)Includes loss on disposal of fixed assets and foreign currency (gains) losses.

Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Revenues
Revenues for the above periods are presented below:
Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)2019% of Revenues2018% of Revenues
Revenues:
Wire transfer and money order fees, net$273,081 85 %$232,380 84 %
Foreign exchange gain, net44,268 14 %39,765 15 %
Other income2,252 %1,756 %
Total revenues$319,601 100 %$273,901 100 %
Wire transfer and money order fees, net of $273.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased by $40.7 million from $232.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. This increase of $40.7 million was primarily due to a 19% increase in transaction volume largely due to the continued growth in our agent network, which has grown by 10% from December 2018 to December 2019.
Revenues from foreign exchange of $44.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased by $4.5 million from $39.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. This increase was primarily due to higher transaction volume achieved by growth in our agent network.


37

Index
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the above periods are presented below:
Year Ended December 31,
($ in thousands)2019% of
Revenues
2018% of
Revenues
Operating expenses:
Service charges from agents and banks$212,670 67 %$182,471 67 %
Salaries and benefits30,705 10 %32,926 12 %
Other selling, general and administrative expenses27,095 %19,442 %
Transaction costs— — 10,319 %
Depreciation and amortization12,689 %15,671 %
Total operating expenses$283,159 89 %$260,829 96 %
Service charges from agents and banks— Service charges from agents and banks were $212.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $182.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase of $30.2 million, or 17%, million was primarily due to the increase in transaction volume.
Salaries and benefits— Salaries and benefits were $30.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, which represented a decrease of $2.2 million from $32.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease of $2.2 million is primarily due to $4.7 million of share-based compensation in the year ended December 31, 2018 related to the accelerated vesting of incentive units in connection with the Merger that did not reoccur in 2019. This decrease during the year ended December 31, 2019 was offset by $1.0 million in increased wages, largely in management and other areas to support our growing operations and a $1.5 million increase related to share-based compensation.
Other selling, general and administrative expenses— Other selling, general and administrative expenses of $27.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased by $7.7 million from $19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
The increase was the result of:
$3.7 million - settlement and legal fees associated with a TCPA class action lawsuit;
$1.8 million - legal and other professional fees associated with the Company’s SEC filings, including the Warrants Offer and a secondary offering in 2019 of the Company’s common stock;
$1.1 million - higher insurance premiums, property taxes and other operating expenses; and
$1.1 million - higher IT related expenses incurred to sustain our business expansion.

Transaction costs— Transaction costs of $10.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 include costs related to the Merger, consisting primarily of employee bonuses, termination of management fee agreement, change in control fee to our public shareholderslender and legal and other professional fees. There were no transaction costs for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Depreciation and amortization— Depreciation and amortization of $12.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased by way$3.0 million from $15.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. This decrease is due to $3.1 million less amortization related to the trade name, developed technology and agent relationships during the year ended December 31, 2019 as these intangibles are being amortized on an accelerated basis, which declines over time. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in depreciation of redemption$0.1 million associated primarily with additional computer equipment to support our growing business and ceaseagent network.
Non-Operating Expenses
Interest expense— Interest expense was $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease of $9.9 million from $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease of $9.9 million was due to a reduction in the interest rates paid under the Credit Agreement, which accounted for $4.6 million, and the write-off of unamortized debt origination costs and a prepayment penalty of $3.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively, related to the November 2018 refinancing of our senior secured credit facility, which were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018 and did not reoccur in 2019.
Income tax provision— Income tax provision was $8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of $6.4 million from an income tax provision of $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in the income tax provision was mainly due to an $8.5 million increase attributable to higher taxable income, offset by $1.6 million less non-deductible expenses and $0.5 million of write-offs of transaction costs and net operating losses and other items.
38

Index
Net Income (Loss)
We reported net income of $19.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to net loss of $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, which resulted in an increase of $26.8 million due primarily to the same factors discussed above.
Earnings (Loss) per Share
Earnings per Share - Basic and Diluted for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $0.52, representing an increase of $0.80, or 285.7%, compared to a Loss per Share - Basic and Diluted of $0.28 for the year ended December 31, 2018 due primarily to the same factors discussed above.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings per Share
Adjusted Net Income (previously defined and used as described above) for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $32.6 million, representing an increase of $14.2 million, or 77%, from Adjusted Net Income of $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in Adjusted Net Income was primarily due to the increase in revenues of $45.7 million and a decrease in interest expense and salaries and benefits, offset by an increase in service charges from agents and banks of $30.2 million as well as increases in other operating expenses to support the growth in our business.
The following table presents the reconciliation of Net Income (Loss), our closest GAAP measure, to Adjusted Net Income:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except for share data)20192018
Net Income (Loss)$19,609 $(7,244)
Adjusted for:
Transaction costs (a)— 10,319 
Incentive units plan (b)— 4,735 
Share-based compensation (c)2,609 1,091 
Offering costs (d)1,669 — 
Transition expenses (e)— 348 
Management fee (f)— 585 
TCPA Settlement (g)3,736 192 
Costs related to registering stock underlying warrants (h)— 615 
Other employee severance (i)172 106 
Other charges and expenses (j)305 410 
Amortization of intangibles (k)9,248 12,392 
Income tax benefit related to adjustments (l)(4,789)(5,187)
Adjusted Net Income$32,559 $18,362 
Adjusted Earnings per share
Basic and diluted$0.87 $0.72 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
Basic37,428,345 25,484,386 
Diluted37,594,158 25,484,386 

(a)Represents direct costs related to the Merger, which consist primarily of legal, consulting, accounting, advisory fees and certain incentive bonuses.
(b)In connection with the Merger, incentive units were granted to our employees, which became fully vested and were paid out upon the closing of the Merger.
(c)Stock options and restricted stock were granted to employees and independent directors of the Company.
39

Index
(d)Represents expenses incurred for professional and legal fees in connection with a secondary offering of the Company’s common stock and the Warrants Offer.
(e)Represents recruiting fees and severance costs related to managerial changes in connection with becoming a publicly-traded company in 2018.
(f)Represents payments under a management agreement with a related party pursuant to which we paid a quarterly fee for certain advisory and consulting services. In connection with the Merger, this agreement was terminated.
(g)Represents legal fees and charges for settlement of class action lawsuits related to the TCPA.
(h)Represents professional fees in connection with the registration of common stock underlying outstanding warrants.
(i)Represents severance costs incurred related to departmental changes.
(j)Includes loss on disposal of fixed assets, foreign currency (gains) losses and legal expenses considered to be non-recurring.
(k)Represents the amortization of certain intangible assets that resulted from the application of push-down accounting.
(l)Represents the current and deferred tax impact of the taxable adjustments to net income using the Company’s blended federal and state tax rate for each period. Relevant tax-deductible adjustments include all operationsadjustments to net income except for $1.7 million of offering costs for the purposesyear ended December 31, 2019, $4.3 million of winding upnon-deductible transaction costs and $4.7 million of non-deductible incentive units plan expense in the year ended December 31, 2018.

Adjusted Earnings per Share - Basic and Diluted (previously defined and used as described above) for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $0.87, representing an increase of $0.15, or 20.8%, compared to $0.72 for the year ended December 31, 2018.
The following table presents the reconciliation of GAAP Earnings per Share, our affairs. 

closest GAAP measure, to Adjusted Earnings per Share:

Year Ended December 31,
20192018
Basic and DilutedBasic and Diluted
GAAP Earnings (loss) per Share$0.52 $(0.28)
Adjusted for:
Transaction costs— 0.40 
Incentive units plan— 0.19 
Share-based compensation0.07 0.04 
Offering costs0.04 — 
Transition expenses— 0.01 
Management fee— 0.02 
TCPA Settlement0.10 0.01 
Costs related to registering stock underlying warrants— 0.02 
Other employee severanceNMNM
Other charges and expenses0.01 0.02 
Amortization of intangibles0.25 0.49 
Income tax benefit related to adjustments(0.13)(0.20)
Adjusted Earnings per Share$0.87 $0.72 

Recent Developments

On


NM - Per share amounts are not meaningful.
The table above may contain slight summation differences due to rounding.

40

Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA (previously defined and used as described above) for the year ended December 19, 2017,31, 2019 was $57.6 million, representing an increase of $10.5 million, or 22%, from $47.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to the increase in revenues of $45.7 million, offset by an increase in service charges from agents and banks of $30.2 million as well as increases in other operating expenses to support the growth in our business.
The following table presents the reconciliation of Net Income (Loss), our closest GAAP measure, to Adjusted EBITDA:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)20192018
Net Income (Loss)$19,609 $(7,244)
Adjusted for:
Interest expense8,510 18,448 
Income tax provision8,323 1,868 
Depreciation and amortization12,689 15,671 
EBITDA49,131 28,743 
Transaction costs (a)— 10,319 
Incentive units plan (b)— 4,735 
Share-based compensation (c)2,609 1,091 
Offering costs (d)1,669 — 
Transition expenses (e)— 348 
Management fee (f)— 585 
TCPA Settlement (g)3,736 192 
Costs related to registering stock underlying warrants (h)— 615 
Other employee severance (i)172 106 
Other charges and expenses (j)305 410 
Adjusted EBITDA$57,622 $47,144 
(a)Represents direct costs related to the Merger, which consist primarily of legal, consulting, accounting, advisory fees and certain incentive bonuses.
(b)In connection with the Merger, incentive units were granted to our employees, which became fully vested and were paid out upon the closing of the Merger.
(c)Stock options and restricted stock were granted to employees and independent directors of the Company.
(d)Represents expenses incurred for professional and legal fees in connection with a secondary offering of the Company’s common stock and the Warrants Offer.
(e)Represents recruiting fees and severance costs related to managerial changes in connection with becoming a publicly-traded company in 2018.
(f)Represents payments under a management agreement with a related party pursuant to which we paid a quarterly fee for certain advisory and consulting services. In connection with the Merger, this agreement was terminated.
(g)Represents legal fees and charges for settlement of class action lawsuits related to the TCPA.
(h)Represents professional fees in connection with the registration of common stock underlying outstanding warrants.
(i)Represents severance costs incurred related to departmental changes.
(j)Includes loss on disposal of fixed assets, foreign currency (gains) losses and legal expenses considered to be non-recurring.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
We consider liquidity in terms of cash flows from operations and their sufficiency to fund business operations, including working capital needs, debt service, acquisitions, contractual obligations and other commitments. In particular, to meet our payment service obligations at all times, we must have sufficient highly liquid assets and be able to move funds on a timely basis.
Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash generated by operating activities supplemented with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Our primary cash needs are for day to day operations, to pay interest and principal on our indebtedness, to fund working capital requirements and to make capital expenditures.
41

Notwithstanding the recent effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. economy, we have funded and still expect to continue funding our liquidity requirements through internally generated funds, supplemented in the ordinary course, with borrowings under our revolving credit facility. While our operating cash flows may be affected by the economic conditions resulting from the pandemic and other factors, we maintain a strong cash balance position and have access to committed funding sources, which we have used only on a limited and ordinary course basis during the year ended December 31, 2020. Therefore, we believe that our projected cash flows generated from operations, together with borrowings under our revolving credit facility are sufficient to fund our principal debt payments, interest expense, our working capital needs and our expected capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months. We will, however, continue to evaluate the nature and extent of these potential impacts to our business and liquidity and capital resources and take action, as necessary, to preserve adequate liquidity, such as limiting discretionary spending and re-prioritizing our capital projects, to ensure that our business can continue to operate during these uncertain times.
The Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries as borrowers (the “Loan Parties”) entered into a financing agreement (as amended, theMerger “Credit Agreement”) with a group of banking institutions. The Credit Agreement by provides for a $35 million revolving credit facility, a $90 million term loan facility and amongan up to $30 million incremental facility of which $12 million was utilized in the Company,second quarter of 2019 to pay for theMerger Subs, Intermex and cash portion of theRepresentative, which Warrants Offer. The Credit Agreement also provides for the acquisitionissuance of Intermexletters of credit, which would reduce availability under the revolving credit facility. The maturity date of the Credit Agreement is November 7, 2023.
As of December 31, 2020, we had total indebtedness of $89.4 million, consisting of borrowings under the term loan facility and excluding debt origination costs of $1.8 million. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, there were no outstanding amounts drawn on the revolving credit facility. There were $53.0 million of additional borrowings available under these facilities as of December 31, 2020.
Interest on the term loan facility and revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement is determined by us pursuantreference to theFirst Mergereither LIBOR or a “base rate”, immediately followingin each case plus an applicable margin of 4.50% per annum for LIBOR loans or 3.50% per annum for base rate loans. The Company is also required to pay a fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility equal to 0.35% per annum. The effective interest rates for the year ended December 31, 2020 for the term loan and revolving credit facility were 5.78% and 1.00%, respectively.
The principal amount of the term loan facility under the Credit Agreement must be repaid in consecutive quarterly installments of 5.0% in year 1, 7.5% in years 2 and 3, and 10.0% in years 4 and 5, in each case on the last day of each quarter, which commenced in March 2019 with a final payment at maturity. The loans under the initial surviving entity willCredit Agreement may be merged (the “Second Merger,”prepaid at any time without payment or penalty.
The Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a quarterly minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25:1.00 and togethera quarterly maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 3.25:1.00. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we were in compliance with the First Merger, the “Merger”) with and into Merger Sub 2, with Merger Sub 2 continuing as the surviving entity and a direct wholly owned subsidiarycovenants of the Company.

Credit Agreement.

The Credit Agreement also contains covenants that limit the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, grant liens, incur additional indebtedness, make acquisitions or investments, dispose of certain assets, change the nature of their businesses, enter into certain transactions with affiliates or amend the terms of material indebtedness.
In addition, the Credit Agreement establishes certain restrictions on payment of dividends or cash distributions other than for certain purposes, including the following: i) to pay cash dividends to the Company in an amount necessary to cover reasonable and customary corporate and operating expenses, ii) to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire warrants, rights or options on the Company’s common stock of an aggregate amount of up to $10 million plus the Available Amount (as defined in the Credit Agreement), iii) to repurchase the Company’s common stock from current or former employees in an aggregate amount of up to $5 million per calendar year, and iv) other restricted payments in an aggregate amount not to exceed $5 million plus the Available Amount.
As a result of the Merger, each outstanding share of Intermex Common Stock will convert into the right to receive a combination of cash and shares of our common stock, as calculated pursuant to the termsrestrictions described above, among others, substantially all of the Merger Agreement.

PursuantCompany’s net assets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 are considered restricted net assets.

The obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the Company and certain domestic subsidiaries of the Company and secured by liens on substantially all of the assets of the Loan Parties, subject to certain exclusions and limitations.
On April 20, 2020, the Merger Agreement,Company received funds under the aggregate consideration to be paid by usPaycheck Protection Program (the “Program”) in the Merger will consistamount of (i) $92,000,000 in cash ($2,000,000 of which will be placed in escrow at closing as security$3.5 million. Although the Company believes that it met all eligibility criteria for working capital adjustments), (ii) approximately $161,000,000 in shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment in accordance witha loan under the terms of the Merger Agreement, and (iii) an amount (as determined in accordance with the Merger Agreement) equal to any excess cash at IntermexProgram at the time of its application, subsequent to receiving the closingfunds, the Small Business Administration (“SBA”), in consultation with the Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), provided additional guidance to address public, borrower and lender questions concerning the eligibility criteria under the Program. Based on this guidance provided by the SBA and Treasury, the Company returned the funds received under the Program on April 29, 2020.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital, limit our ability to react to changes in the form of casheconomy or additional shares of our common stock, atindustry, expose us to interest rate risk and prevent us from meeting our option, subjectobligations. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to certain limited exceptions. The cash consideration will be funded from the cash held in our Trust Account after permitted redemptions.

Results of Operations

Our

42

Index
Indebtedness—We have neither engaged in any operations nor generated anya substantial amount of indebtedness, which may limit our operating revenues asflexibility and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of December 31, 2017. Our only activities from inception to December 31, 2017 have been organizational activities, preparation for and consummation of our Initial Public Offering, identifying a target company for a Business Combination and activities in connection withoperations.”
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes the proposed acquisition of Intermex. We do not expect to generate any operating revenues prior to the completion of our initial Business Combination, of which there can be no assurance.   

Upon the consummation of our Initial Public Offering on January 25, 2017, we deposited $175,000,000 of the gross proceeds of the Initial Public Offering and Private Placement into a trust account (the “Trust Account”). Funds in the Trust Account are invested in U.S. government treasury bills with a maturity of 180 days or less or money market funds investing solely in U.S. treasuries and meeting the conditions specified in Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). Following our Initial Public Offering we have generated, and expect to continue to generate, non-operating income in the form of interest income on cash and marketable securities held in the Trust Account. We expect to incur increased operating expenses as a result of being a public company (for legal, financial reporting, accounting and auditing compliance), as well as for due diligence expenses relating to an initial Business Combination. 

For the year ended December 31, 2017, we had a net loss of $185,347, which consists of operating costs of $1,131,812 and a provision for income taxes of $436,721, offset by interest income on cash and marketable securities held in the Trust Account of $1,383,186.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, we had a net loss of $1,621 and incurred costs of $1,621.

For the period from May 28, 2015 (inception) through December 31, 2015, we had a net loss of $2,187 and incurred costs of $2,187.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Until the consummation of the Initial Public Offering on January 25, 2017, our only source of liquidity was the sale of 6,000,000 shares (the “Founder Shares”) of our common stock (“Common Stock”)changes to our sponsor and certain of our initial shareholders for an aggregate purchase price of $28,311, and monies loaned to us by the sponsor to fund organizational costs and expenses in connection with our Initial Public Offering.  As of December 31, 2017, all such loans from the sponsor have been repaid.


On January 25, 2017, we consummated the Initial Public Offering of 17,500,000 Units at a price of $10.00 per Unit generating gross proceeds of $175,000,000. Simultaneously with the closing of the Initial Public Offering, we sold an aggregate of 420,000 Units (the “Placement Units”) in the Private Placement for an aggregate purchase price of $4,200,000, or $10.00 per Unit, to the sponsor (390,000 Units) and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (30,000 Units), the underwritercash flows for the Initial Public Offering (“Cantor Fitzgerald”), pursuant to an exemption from registration contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. Each Placement Unit consists of one share of common stock and one-half of one warrant to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment (a “Placement Warrant”). Following the Initial Public Offering, $175,000,000 of the gross proceeds of the Initial Public Offering and the Private Placement were placed into the Trust Account. 

As of December 31, 2017, we had cash of $362,581 held outside the Trust Account. At December 31, 2017, we had $917,259 of accounts payable, accrued expenses and income taxes payable, $25,000 of deferred legal fees payable relating to the Initial Public Offering, which are payable only if we consummate a Business Combination or upon dissolution of the Company if a Business Combination is not completed by January 25, 2019, and $9,190,000 of deferred underwriting fees, which are payable only if we consummate a Business Combination. The deferred underwriting fees are held in the Trust Account. 

As of December 31, 2017, we had cash and marketable securities held in the Trust Account of $175,883,186 (including approximately $1,383,000 of interest income) consisting of U.S. treasury bills with a maturity of 180 days or less. Interest income on the balance in the Trust Account may be used by us for working capital purposes and to pay taxes or any dissolution expenses. Through December 30, 2017, we have withdrawn $500,000 from the interest earned on the Trust Account.In January 2018, we withdrew an additional $562,554 from the interest earned on the Trust Account.

For the year ended December 31, 2017,periods presented:

Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202020192018
Statement of Cash Flows Data:
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(880)$52,534 $19,838 
Net cash used in investing activities(4,062)(6,719)(5,451)
Net cash used in financing activities(6,160)(32,944)(1,113)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(108)217 (40)
Net (decrease) increase in cash(11,210)13,088 13,234 
Cash, beginning of the year$86,117 $73,029 $59,795 
Cash, end of the year$74,907 $86,117 $73,029 

Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities was $667,720, consisting$0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, a decrease of $53.4 million from net cash provided by operating activities of $52.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease of $53.4 million is a result of $66.3 million related to changes in working capital, primarily due to prefunding activity with our paying agents, offset by $12.9 million of cash generated by our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2020, which were positively impacted by the further growth of the business.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $52.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of $32.7 million from $19.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase of $32.7 million is a result of additional cash generated by our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2019, which were positively impacted by the further growth of the business, and also $15.5 million related to changes in working capital.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, a decrease of $2.6 million from $6.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. This decrease in cash used was primarily due to lower purchases of property and equipment, partially as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and no acquisitions of agent locations during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Net cash used in investing activities was $6.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of $1.2 million from $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. This increase in cash used was primarily due to higher purchases of property and equipment during the year ended December 31, 2019 consistent with the growth of our agent network and IT department infrastructure.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $6.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, which consisted of scheduled quarterly repayments due on the term loan facility, offset by proceeds from issuance of stock as a result of the exercise of options.
Net cash used in financing activities was $32.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, which consisted primarily of a net loss$30.0 million in revolving credit line repayments, $10.0 million related to payments made in connection with the Warrants Offer and $5.0 million of $185,347 and interest earnedquarterly payments due on the term loan facility, partially offset by $12.0 million in borrowings under the Credit Agreement.
Net cash and marketable securities heldused in financing activities was $1.1 million for the Trust Account of $1,383,186. Changes in operating assets and liabilities provided $900,813 of cash for operating activities.  

We intend to use substantially allyear ended December 31, 2018. The year ended December 31, 2018 included the repayment of the funds held in the Trust Account to complete our Business Combination. We may withdraw interest on funds held in the Trust Account for working capital purposes,term loan of $95.8 million, the payment of taxes or dissolution expenses, if any. If we use our equity or$3.5 million in debt securitiesorigination costs and $1.8 million of a prepayment penalty, offset by borrowings of $90.0 million as consideration for our initial Business Combination, or we do not use allpart of the funds released fromrefinancing of a former senior secured credit facility, $10.0 million of net borrowings under the Trust Account forrevolving facility and net proceeds related to the Merger.

43

Index
Contractual Obligations
The following table includes aggregated information about contractual obligations that affect our liquidity and capital needs. At December 31, 2020, our contractual obligations over the next several periods were as follows:
(in thousands)TotalLess than
1 year
1 to 3 years3 to 5 yearsMore than 5
years
Debt, principal payments$89,383 $7,661 $81,722 $— $— 
Interest payments$10,918 4,216 6,702 — — 
Non-cancelable operating leases$4,991 1,476 2,077 1,438 — 
Total$105,292 $13,353 $90,501 $1,438 $— 

Our consolidated balance sheet reflects $87.6 million of debt as of December 31, 2020, as the principal payment obligations of such consideration, we may apply$89.4 million are gross of unamortized debt origination costs of $1.8 million. The above table reflects the excess funds for general corporate purposes, including for maintenance or expansion of operations of acquired businesses, the payment of principal orand interest due on indebtedness incurred in consummating the initial Business Combination, including loans made to us by the sponsor to fund an initial Business Combination, or for working capital. Funds held in the Trust Account may also be used to fund the redemption of common stock. 

We intend to use the funds held outside the Trust Account primarily to identify and evaluate target businesses, perform business due diligence on prospective target businesses, pay for travel expenditures, structure, negotiate and complete a Business Combination, and for working capital purposes. 

The sponsor committed to loan us funds from time to time of up to a maximum of $1,100,000 to finance transaction costs in connection with an initial Business Combination and for working capital requirements following our Initial Public Offering. See Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements - Related Party Transactions, for a description of the termsrevolver and term loan under the Credit Agreement that will be paid through the maturity of this loan.

Off-balance sheet financing arrangements 

the debt using the rates in effect on December 31, 2020 and assuming no voluntary prepayments of principal.

Non-cancelable operating leases include various office leases, including our office headquarters.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We doare not havea party to any material off-balance sheet arrangements, such as guarantee contracts, retained or contingent interests, certain derivative instruments and variable interest entities that either have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our consolidated financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

statements.

Contractual obligations 

We do not have any long-term debt, capital lease obligations, operating lease obligations or long-term liabilities.

Critical Accounting Policies

and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformityaccordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes, as well as the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Management evaluates its accounting policies, estimates and judgments on an on-going basis. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions. Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
Critical accounting policies are those policies that management believes are very important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations, and that require management to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or otherwise complex. Based on these criteria, management has identified the following critical accounting policies:
Revenue Recognition
Revenues for wire transfer and money order fees are recognized at the time the transaction is processed. The Company acts as the principal for these transactions as the Company controls the service at all times prior to transferring the funds to the beneficiary, is primarily responsible for fulfilling the customer contracts, has the risk of loss and has the ability to establish transaction prices. Therefore, these fees are recognized on a gross basis equal to the full amount of the fee charged to the customer. These fees also vary by transaction primarily depending upon, the principal amount sent, the send and receive locations, as well as the respective currencies of the send and receive locations. Foreign exchange gain, which represents the difference between the exchange rate set by the Company and the rate realized, is recognized upon the disbursement of U.S. dollars to entities from which the Company is acquiring foreign currency. Other income primarily represents revenues for technology services provided to the independent network of agents who utilize the Company’s technology in processing transactions and check cashing services, for which revenue is derived by a fee per transaction.
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the new accounting standard, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, as amended, which modified the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. Refer to Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 4, “Revenue Recognition Standard” for further information about the impact of the adoption of this new accounting standard.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses
Accounts receivable are recorded upon initiation of the wire transfer and are typically due to us within five days. We maintain an allowance for credit losses for estimated losses resulting primarily from the inability of our sending agents to make required payments. When preparing these estimates, we consider a number of factors, including the aging of a sending agent’s account, creditworthiness of specific sending agents, historical trends and other information. We review our allowance for credit losses policy periodically, reflecting current risks and changes in industry conditions and, when necessary, will increase our allowance for credit losses and recognize a
44

Index
provision for bad debt expense, included in other selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets result primarily from business combination acquisitions. Intangible assets include agent relationships, trade name, developed technology and other intangibles, all with finite lives. Our agent relationships, trade name and developed technology are currently amortized utilizing an accelerated method over their estimated useful lives. Other intangible assets are amortized straight-line over a useful life of 10 years. Upon the acquisition, the purchase price is first allocated to identifiable assets and liabilities, including the trade name and other intangibles, with any remaining purchase price recorded as goodwill.
Goodwill is not amortized, rather, an impairment test is conducted on an annual basis, at the beginning of the fourth quarter, or more frequently if indicators of impairment are present. For purposes of the annual impairment test, management initially performs a qualitative assessment, which includes consideration of the economic, industry and market conditions in addition to our overall financial performance and the performance of these assets. If our qualitative assessment does not conclude that it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is greater than the carrying value, we perform a quantitative analysis. In a quantitative test, the fair value of a reporting unit is determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis. A discounted cash flow analysis requires us to make various assumptions, including assumptions about future cash flows, growth rates and discount rates. The assumptions about future cash flows and growth rates are based on our long-term projections. Assumptions used in our impairment testing are consistent with our internal forecasts and operating plans. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, there is no impairment. If not, we compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount. To the extent the carrying amount exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment charge would be necessary.
We review for impairment indicators of finite-lived intangibles and other long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with GAAP which require, among other things, recognition of future tax benefits measured at enacted tax rates attributable to deductible temporary differences between financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities and to tax net operating loss carryforwards to the extent that realization of said benefits is more likely than not.
We account for tax contingencies by assessing all material positions, including all significant uncertain positions, for all tax years that are open to assessment or challenge under tax statutes. Those positions that have only timing consequences are separately analyzed based on the recognition and measurement model provided in the tax guidance.
As required by the uncertain tax position guidance, we recognize the financial statement benefit of a position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the positions following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements and income and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. The Company has not identified any critical accounting policies. 

Recent accounting pronouncements 

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  

Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the sensitivitylargest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to apply. We apply the uncertain tax position guidance to all tax positions for which the statute of limitations remains open. Our policy is to classify interest accrued as interest expense and penalties as operating expenses.

Our foreign subsidiaries are subject to taxes by local tax authorities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, for further discussion.
ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency Risk
We manage foreign currency risk through the structure of the business and an active risk management process. We currently settle with our payers in Latin America primarily by entering into foreign exchange spot transactions with local and foreign currency providers (“counterparties”). The foreign currency exposure on our foreign exchange spot transactions is limited by the fact that all transactions are settled within two business days from trade date. Foreign currency fluctuations, however, may negatively affect our average exchange gain per transaction.
45

Index
In addition, included in wire transfers and money orders payable, net in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, there are $7.6 million and $12.6 million, respectively, of wire transfers payable denominated in foreign currencies, primarily in Mexican pesos and Guatemalan quetzales.
Also, included in prepaid wires, net in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, there are $50.1 million and $16.4 million, respectively, of prepaid wires denominated in foreign currencies, primarily in Mexican pesos and Guatemalan quetzales.
We are also exposed to changes in currency rates as a result of our investments in foreign operations and revenues generated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Revenues and profits generated by international operations will increase or decrease because of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. This foreign currency risk is related primarily to our operations in our foreign subsidiaries. Revenues from our foreign subsidiaries represent less than 1% of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020. Therefore, a 10% increase or decrease in these currency rates against the U.S. Dollar would result in a de minimis change to our overall operating results.
The spot and average exchange rates for Mexico, Guatemala and Canada currencies to U.S. dollar are as follows:
202020192018
Spot(1)
Average(2)
Spot(1)
Average(2)
Spot(1)
Average(2)
U.S. dollar/Mexico Peso19.89 21.47 18.86 19.23 19.65 19.22 
U.S. dollar/Guatemala Quetzal7.79 7.71 7.69 7.69 7.73 7.52 
U.S. dollar/Canadian Dollar(3)
1.28 1.34 1.31 1.33 — — 
(1)Spot exchange rates are as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
(2)Average exchange rates are for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
(3)We commenced operations in Canada during 2019, therefore we did not include information prior to this year.

Long-term sustained appreciation of the Mexican peso or Guatemalan quetzal as compared to the U.S. dollar could affect our margins.
Beginning in March 2020, we have experienced increased volatility in the U.S. dollar/Mexican peso rates related to economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as actions taken by governments and central banks in response to the pandemic. We cannot, however, reasonably estimate the duration or extent of that volatility.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest on the term loan and revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement is determined by reference to either LIBOR or a “base rate”, in each case, plus an applicable margin of 4.50% per annum for LIBOR loans or 3.50% per annum for base rate loans. The Company is also required to pay a fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility equal to 0.35% per annum. Because interest expense is subject to fluctuation, if interest rates foreign exchanges, commodity prices, equity pricesincrease, our debt service obligations on such variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount borrowed remained the same. Accordingly, an increase in interest rates would adversely affect our profitability. Due to the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, market interest rates have declined significantly, with the 10-year Treasury bond yield falling below 1.00% on March 3, 2020 and averaging 0.89% for the year ended December 31, 2020, and the 30-day LIBOR rate decreasing to 0.15% as of December 31, 2020, favorably affecting interest expense on the variable-rate portion of our debt for the year ended December 31, 2020. We cannot predict, however, whether or for how long interest rates will remain at these low levels.
As of December 31, 2020, we had $89.4 million in outstanding borrowings under the term loan. A hypothetical 1% increase or decrease in the interest rate on our indebtedness as of December 31, 2020 would have increased or decreased cash interest expense on our term loan by approximately $0.9 million per annum.
Credit Risk
We maintain certain cash balances in various U.S. banks, which at times, may exceed federally insured limits. We have not incurred any losses on these accounts. In addition, we maintain various bank accounts in Mexico, Guatemala and Canada, which are not insured. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we have not incurred material losses on these uninsured accounts. To manage our exposures to credit risk with respect to cash balances and other market driven rates or prices. credit risk exposures resulting from our relationships with banks and financial institutions, we regularly review cash concentrations, and we attempt to diversify our cash balances among global financial institutions.
We are also exposed to credit risk related to receivable balances from sending agents. We perform a blank check company incorporated on May 28, 2015credit review before each agent signing and conduct ongoing analyses of sending agents and certain other parties we transact with directly. As of December 31, 2020, we also had $1.5 million outstanding of notes receivable from sending agents. Most of the notes are collateralized by personal guarantees from the sending agents and by assets from their businesses. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is possible we could be adversely affected by
46

Index
credit losses, such as a Delaware corporation formed forthose related to our outstanding notes receivables from sending agents. At the purposedate of effecting a Business Combination with one or more businesses. We are not presently engaged in and, if we do not consummate a suitable Business Combination prior to January 25, 2019, we may not engage in, any substantive commercial business. Accordingly,this report, however, we are not aware of any significant exposure and until such time as we consummate a Business Combination, we will not be, exposedare continuing to significant risks associated with foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices or other market driven rates or prices.monitor our credit risk.
Our provision for bad debt was approximately $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 (0.5% of total revenues), $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 (0.5% of total revenues) and $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 (0.5% of total revenues). The net proceeds ofincrease in our Initial Public Offering heldprovision for bad debt in the Trust Account may be invested onlyyear ended December 31, 2020 is consistent with the increase in U.S. government treasury bills with a maturity of 180 days or less oraccount receivable balances due to our growth in money market funds investing solely in U.S. treasuries and meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act. Given our limited risk in our exposure to government securities and money market funds, we do not view the interest rate risk to be significant. 


Item 8.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

  2017 
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  Year ended
December 31,
2017
 
Operating costs $226,756  $106,063  $162,040  $636,953  $1,131,812 
Loss from operations  (226,756)  (106,063)  (162,040)  (636,953)  (1,131,812)
Interest income  61,666   340,465   456,224   524,831   1,383,186 
Provision for income taxes     (109,457)  (155,116)  (172,148)  (436,721)
Net Income (Loss) $(165,090) $124,945  $139,068  $(284,270) $(185,347)
Loss per common share:                    
Basic and Diluted $(0.02) $0.02  $0.02  $(0.04) $(0.02)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:                    
Basic and Diluted  7,070,173   7,778,601   7,766,107   7,752,200   7,594,116 
                     
Balance Sheet Data (at period end)                    
Cash $233,184  $163,746  $74,873  $362,581  $362,581 
Cash and securities held in Trust Account  175,061,666   175,402,131   175,858,355   175,883,186   175,883,186 
Total Assets  175,381,640   175,622,116   175,982,656   176,259,327   176,259,327 
Total Liabilities  9,234,315   9,349,846   9,571,318   10,132,259   10,132,259 
Common stock subject to possible redemption  161,147,324   161,272,260   161,411,330   161,127,060   161,127,060 
Total Stockholders’ Equity $5,000,001  $5,000,010  $5,000,008  $5,000,008  $5,000,008 

  2016 
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  Year Ended
December 31,
2016
 
Operating costs $  $  $871  $750  $1,621 
Net Loss $  $  $(871) $(750) $(1,621)
Loss per common share:                    
Basic and diluted $  $  $(0.00) $(0.00) $(0.00)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:                    
Basic and diluted  5,271,666   5,271,666   5,271,666   5,271,666   5,271,666 
                     
Balance Sheet Data (at period end)                    
Cash $  $  $14,338  $82,614  $82,614 
Total Assets  113   4,388   18,525   470,536   470,536 
Total Liabilities  2,300   6,575   172,921   449,344   449,344 
Total Stockholders’ Equity $(2,187) $(2,187) $21,942  $21,192  $21,192 

  2015 
  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  For The Period from May 28, 2015 (inception) through
December 31,
2015
 
Operating costs $    —  $  $  $2,187  $2,187 
Net Loss $  $  $  $(2,1870) $(2,187)
Loss per common share:                    
Basic and diluted $  $(0.00) $(0.00) $(0.00) $(0.00)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:                    
Basic and diluted     5,271,666   5,271,666   5,271,666   5,271,666 
                     
Balance Sheet Data (at period end)                    
Cash $  $  $  $  $ 
Total Assets               
Total Liabilities     2,187   2,187   2,187   2,187 
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) $  $(2,187) $(2,187) $(2,187) $(2,187)

F-1
volume.

47

FINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II


ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
F-7
F-8 to F-17


All other financial statement schedules for International Money Express, Inc. have been omitted because they are not applicable, or because the information required is included in the respective consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
48

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders

Shareholders and the Board of Directors of

FinTech Acquisition Corp. II 

International Money Express, Inc.
Miami, Florida

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of FinTech Acquisition Corp. IIInternational Money Express, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and for the period from May 28, 2015 (inception) to December 31, 20152020, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index (collectively referred to as the "consolidated“consolidated financial statements"statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as ofat December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the results of its consolidated operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and for the period from May 28, 2015 (inception) to December 31, 2015,2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements if the Company is unable to complete a Business Combination by January 25, 2019, then the Company will cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up and liquidating. This mandatory liquidation and subsequent dissolution raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


Basis for Opinion


These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"(“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.




/s/ WithumSmith+Brown, PC

BDO USA, LLP


Certified Public Accountants

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2016.

Whippany, New Jersey

2017.


Miami, Florida

March 13, 2018

F-3
15, 2021

F-1


IndexFINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES

INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  

December 31,
2017

  

December 31,
2016

 
ASSETS      
Current Assets      
Cash $362,581  $82,614 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  13,560    
Total Current Assets  376,141   82,614 
         
Cash and marketable securities held in Trust Account  175,883,186    
Deferred offering costs     387,922 
Total Assets $176,259,327  $470,536 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities        
Accrued expenses $480,538  $2,886 
Income taxes payable  436,721    
Accrued offering costs     214,612 
Promissory note – related party     231,846 
Total Current Liabilities  917,259   449,344 
         
Deferred underwriting fees  9,190,000    
Deferred legal fees payable  25,000    
Total Liabilities  10,132,259   449,344 
         
Commitments and Contingencies        
         
Common stock subject to possible redemption, $0.0001 par value; 16,112,706 and -0- shares (at redemption value of approximately $10.00 per share) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively  161,127,060    
         
Stockholders’ Equity        
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 5,000,000 authorized, none issued and outstanding      
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 35,000,000 shares authorized; 7,780,627 and 5,298,333 shares issued and outstanding (excluding 16,112,706 and -0- shares subject to possible redemption) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively  778   530 
Additional paid-in capital  5,188,385   24,470 
Accumulated deficit  (189,155)  (3,808)
Total Stockholders’ Equity  5,000,008   21,192 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $176,259,327  $470,536 

(in thousands, except for share data)

December 31,
20202019
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash$74,907 $86,117 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,503 and $759, respectively55,017 39,754 
Prepaid wires, net53,281 18,201 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets3,521 4,155 
Total current assets186,726 148,227 
Property and equipment, net13,021 13,282 
Goodwill36,260 36,260 
Intangible assets, net20,430 27,381 
Deferred tax asset, net741 
Other assets3,036 1,415 
Total assets$259,473 $227,306 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt, net$7,044 $7,044 
Accounts payable12,771 13,401 
Wire transfers and money orders payable, net41,746 40,197 
Accrued and other liabilities22,380 23,074 
Total current liabilities83,941 83,716 
Long-term liabilities:
Debt, net80,579 87,623 
Deferred tax liabilities, net692 
Total long-term liabilities81,271 87,623 
Commitments and contingencies, see Note 1700
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock $0.0001 par value; 230,000,000 shares authorized, 38,217,125 and 38,034,389 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively
Additional paid-in capital59,310 54,694 
Retained earnings34,960 1,176 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income(13)93 
Total stockholders’ equity94,261 55,967 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$259,473 $227,306 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of thethese consolidated financial statements.

F-4

F-2


IndexFINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES

INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

  Year Ended December 31,  For the
Period from
May 28,
2015
(inception)
through
December 31,
 
  2017  2016  2015 
          
Operating costs $1,131,812  $1,621  $2,187 
Loss from operations.  (1,131,812)  (1,621)  2,187 
             
Other income:            
Interest income  1,383,186       
             
Income (loss) before taxes  251,374   (1,621)  (2,187)
Provision for income taxes  (436,721)      
             
Net loss $(185,347) $(1,621)  (2,187)
             
Weighted average shares outstanding            
Basic and diluted(1) (2)  7,594,116   5,271,666   5,271,666 
             
Net loss per common share            
Basic and diluted $(0.02) $(0.00)  (0.00)

(1)This number excludes an aggregate of up to 16,112,706 shares subject to possible redemption at December 31, 2017.
(2)On January 25, 2017, as a result of the underwriters’ election to exercise a portion of their over-allotment option, 26,667 shares held by the Initial Stockholders (as defined in Note 1) were forfeited (Note 5).

AND

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands, except for share data)

Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Revenues:
Wire transfer and money order fees, net$307,909 $273,081 $232,380 
Foreign exchange gain, net46,763 44,268 39,765 
Other income2,537 2,252 1,756 
Total revenues357,209 319,601 273,901 
Operating expenses:
Service charges from agents and banks238,597 212,670 182,471 
Salaries and benefits32,831 30,705 32,926 
Other selling, general and administrative expenses22,086 27,095 19,442 
Transaction costs10,319 
Depreciation and amortization10,828 12,689 15,671 
Total operating expenses304,342 283,159 260,829 
Operating income52,867 36,442 13,072 
Interest expense6,566 8,510 18,448 
Income (loss) before income taxes46,301 27,932 (5,376)
Income tax provision12,517 8,323 1,868 
Net income (loss)33,784 19,609 (7,244)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(106)95 
Comprehensive income (loss)$33,678 $19,704 $(7,244)
Earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic$0.89 $0.52 $(0.28)
Diluted$0.88 $0.52 $(0.28)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic38,060,290 37,428,345 25,484,386 
Diluted38,358,171 37,594,158 25,484,386 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of thethese consolidated financial statements.

F-5

F-3


IndexFINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES
INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  

Common Stock(1)

  Additional
Paid-in
  Notes
Receivable
from
  Accumulated  Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Stockholders  Deficit  (Deficit) 
Balance – May 28, 2015 (inception)    $  $  $  $  $ 
                         
Common stock issued to Initial Stockholders in exchange for a note receivable  5,298,333   530   24,470   (25,000)      
                         
Net loss              (2,187)  (2,187)
                         
Balance – December 31, 2015  5,298,333  $530  $24,470  $(25,000) $(2,187) $(2,187)
                         
Collection of notes receivable from stockholders           25,000      25,000 
                         
Net loss              (1,621)  (1,621)
                         
Balance – December 31, 2016  5,298,333   530   24,470      (3,808)  21,192 
                         
Issuance of common stock to Initial Stockholders  701,667   70   3,241         3,311 
                         
Sale of 17,500,000 Units, net of underwriters discount and offering expenses  17,500,000   1,750   162,086,162         162,087,912 
                         
Sale of 420,000 Placement Units  420,000   42   4,199,958         4,200,000 
                         
Forfeiture of 26,667 shares of common stock due to underwriter not exercising its full over-allotment option  (26,667)  (3)  3          
                         
Common stock subject to redemption  (16,112,706)  (1,611)  (161,125,449)        (161,127,060)
                         
Net loss              (185,347)  (185,347)
Balance – December 31, 2017  7,780,627  $778  $5,188,385  $  $(189,155) $5,000,008 

(in thousands, except for share data)

Common StockAdditional
Paid-in Capital
Retained Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
SharesAmount
Balance, December 31, 201717,227,682 $$46,076 $(10,174)$(2)$35,902 
Net loss— — — (7,244)— (7,244)
Net equity infusion from reverse recapitalization18,955,101 9,987 — — 9,989 
Share-based compensation— — 5,826 — — 5,826 
Balance, December 31, 201836,182,783 $$61,889 $(17,418)$(2)$44,473 
Adoption of new accounting pronouncement— — — (1,015)— (1,015)
Warrant exchange1,800,065 — (10,031)— — (10,031)
Net income— — — 19,609 — 19,609 
Issuance of common stock:
   Exercise of stock options30,349 — 227 — — 227 
   Restricted stock units21,192 — — — — 
Share-based compensation— — 2,609 — — 2,609 
Adjustment from foreign currency translation, net— — — — 95 95 
Balance, December 31, 201938,034,389 $$54,694 $1,176 $93 $55,967 
Net income— — — 33,784 — 33,784 
Issuance of common stock:
   Exercise of stock options163,783 — 1,379 — — 1,379 
   Restricted stock units18,953 — — — — 
Share-based compensation— — 3,237 — — 3,237 
Adjustment from foreign currency translation, net— — — — (106)(106)
Balance, December 31, 202038,217,125 $$59,310 $34,960 $(13)$94,261 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of thethese consolidated financial statements.

F-6

F-4


IndexFINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES
INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  Year Ended December 31,  For the
Period from
May 28,
2015
(inception)
through
December 31,
 
  2017  2016  2015 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:         
Net loss $(185,347) $(1,621) $(2,187)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:            
Interest earned on marketable securities held in Trust Account  (1,383,186)      
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:            
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (13,560)      
Accrued expenses  477,652   999   1,887 
Income taxes payable  436,721       
Net cash used in operating activities  (667,720)  (622)  (300)
             
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:            
Investment of cash in Trust Account  (175,000,000)      
Cash withdrawn from Trust Account  500,000       
Net cash used in investing activities  (174,500,000)      
             
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:            
Proceeds from sale of Units, net of underwriting discounts paid  171,940,000       
Proceeds from sale of Private Placement Units  4,200,000       
Proceed from issuance of common stock to Initial Stockholders  3,311       
Proceeds from collection of notes receivable from stockholders     25,000    
Proceeds from promissory note – related party     231,546   300 
Repayment of promissory note – related party  (231,846)      
Payment of offering costs  (463,778)  (173,310)   
Net cash provided by financing activities  175,447,687   83,236   300 
             
Net Change in Cash  279,967   82,614    
Cash – Beginning  82,614       
Cash – Ending $362,581  $82,614  $ 
             
Non-Cash investing and financing activities:            
Deferred offering costs included in accrued expenses $  $214,612  $ 
Deferred underwriting fees charged to additional paid in capital $9,190,000  $  $ 
Deferred legal fees charged to additional paid in capital $25,000  $  $ 
Initial classification of common stock subject to possible redemption $161,314,270  $  $ 
Change in value of common stock subject to possible redemption $(187,210) $  $ 
Issuance of stock for notes receivable from stockholders $  $  $25,000 

(in thousands)


Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)$33,784 $19,609 $(7,244)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization10,828 12,689 15,671 
Share-based compensation3,237 2,609 5,826 
Provision for bad debt1,801 1,626 1,236 
Debt origination costs amortization760 734 4,448 
Deferred income tax provision, net1,433 1,863 191 
Debt extinguishment costs1,843 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment419 265 216 
Total adjustments18,478 19,786 29,431 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable(17,080)(5,655)14,337 
Prepaid wires, net(35,598)8,805 (19,000)
Prepaid expenses and other assets(1,137)(659)(2,080)
Wire transfers and money orders payable, net2,092 3,416 (11,899)
Accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities(1,419)7,232 16,293 
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities(880)52,534 19,838 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment(4,062)(6,469)(5,331)
Acquisition of agent locations(250)(120)
Net cash used in investing activities(4,062)(6,719)(5,451)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings under term loan12,000 90,000 
Repayments of term loan(7,661)(4,956)(95,788)
(Repayments) borrowings under revolving loan, net(30,000)10,000 
Debt origination costs(240)(3,487)
Debt extinguishment costs(1,843)
Proceeds from reverse recapitalization101,664 
Cash consideration to Intermex shareholders(101,659)
Cash paid in warrant exchange(10,031)
Proceeds from exercise of options1,501 283 
Net cash used in financing activities(6,160)(32,944)(1,113)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(108)217 (40)
Net (decrease) increase in cash(11,210)13,088 13,234 
Cash, beginning of the year86,117 73,029 59,795 
Cash, end of the year$74,907 $86,117 $73,029 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of thethese consolidated financial statements.

F-7

F-5


IndexFINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES
INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest$5,812 $8,768 $10,703 
Cash paid for income taxes$11,140 $4,870 $1,495 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activity:
Agent business acquired in exchange for receivables$$85 $
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:
Issuance of common stock for cashless exercise of options$130 $21 $
Intermex transaction accruals settled by acquisition proceeds$$$9,062 
Net assets acquired in the Merger$$$922 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6

INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND 2016 AND

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MAY 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015

1. DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS

FinTech Acquisition Corp. II

International Money Express, Inc. (the “Company”), is a blank check company incorporated in Delaware on May 28, 2015. The Company was formed for the purpose of acquiring, through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or other similar business transaction, one“us” or more operating businesses or assets (a “Business Combination”). In connection with the proposed acquisition of Intermex Holdings II, Inc. (“Intermex”“we”) (see Note 10), the Company formed two wholly-owned subsidiaries, FinTech II Merger Sub Inc., which was incorporated in Delaware in November 2017 (“Merger Sub I”), and FinTech II Merger Sub 2 LLC, which was formed in Delaware in November 2017 (“Merger Sub II”). Both Merger Sub I and Merger Sub II did not have any activity as of December 31, 2017. The Company has neither engaged in any operations nor generated operating revenues to date.

At December 31, 2017, the Company had not yet commenced operations. All activity through December 31, 2017 relates to the Company’s formation and its Initial Public Offering, which is described below, and identifying a target company for a Business Combination and activities in connection with the proposed acquisition of Intermex, described in Note 10.

The registration statement for the Company’s initial public offering (“Initial Public Offering”) was declared effective on January 19, 2017. On January 25, 2017, the Company consummated the Initial Public Offering of 17,500,000 units (“Units” and, with respect to the common stock included in the Units being offered, the “Public Shares”), which includes a partial exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option in the amount of 2,200,000 Units at $10.00 per Unit, generating gross proceeds of $175,000,000, which is described in Note 3. 

Simultaneously with the closing of the Initial Public Offering, the Company consummated the sale of 420,000 units (the “Placement Units”) at a price of $10.00 per Unit in a private placement to the Company’s sponsor, FinTech Investors Holding II, LLC (the “Sponsor”), and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., the representative of the underwriters for the Initial Public Offering (“Cantor”), generating gross proceeds of $4,200,000, which is described in Note 4.

Transaction costs amounted to $12,912,088, consisting of $3,060,000 of underwriting fees, $9,190,000 of deferred underwriting fees payable (which are held in the Trust Account (defined below)) and $662,088 of Initial Public Offering costs. As described in Note 6, the $9,190,000 deferred underwriting fee payable is contingent upon the consummation of a Business Combination by January 25, 2019. As described in Note 6, the $25,000 of deferred legal fees are payable upon the earlier of an initial Business Combination or liquidation of the Company.

Following the closing of the Initial Public Offering on January 25, 2017, an amount of $175,000,000 ($10.00 per Unit) from the net proceeds of the sale of the Units in the Initial Public Offering and the Placement Units was placed in a trust account (“Trust Account”) and invested in U.S. government securities, within the meaning set forth in Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), with a maturity of 180 days or less or in any open-ended investment company that holds itself outoperates as a money market fund selectedtransmitter between the United States of America (“United States” or “U.S.”) and Canada to Mexico, Guatemala and other countries in Latin America, Africa and Asia through a network of authorized agents located in various unaffiliated retail establishments and 34 Company-operated stores throughout the U.S. and Canada.

During March 2020, a global pandemic was declared by the Company meetingWorld Health Organization related to the conditions of paragraphs (d)(2), (d)(3) and (d)(4) of Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act, as determined by the Company, until the earlier of: (i) the consummationrapidly growing outbreak of a Business Combination, (ii) the redemptionnovel strain of any Public Shares in connection with a stockholder votecoronavirus (“COVID-19”). The pandemic has had and continues to amend the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to modify the substance or timing of the Company’s obligation to redeem 100% of its Public Shares if it does not complete a Business Combination by January 25, 2019 (the “Combination Period”); or (iii) the distribution of the Trust Account, as described below, if the Company is unable to complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period or upon any earlier liquidation of the Company.

The Company’s management has broad discretion with respect to the specific application of the net proceeds of its Initial Public Offering and Placement Units, although substantially all of the net proceeds are intended to be applied generally toward consummating a Business Combination. Nasdaq Capital Market (“NASDAQ”) rules provide that the Company’s initial Business Combination must be with one or more target businesses that together have a fair market value equal to at least 80% of the balance in the Trust Account (less any deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payablesignificant effect on interest earned) at the time of the signing of a definitive agreement in connection with a Business Combination. However, the Company will only complete a Business Combination if the post-Business Combination company owns or acquires a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquires a controlling interest in the target sufficient for it not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully effect a Business Combination.

F-8

FINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 AND

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MAY 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015

The Company will provide its stockholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their Public Shares upon the completion of a Business Combination either (i) in connection with a stockholder meeting called to approve the Business Combination or (ii) by means of a tender offer. The decision as to whether the Company will seek stockholder approval of a Business Combination or conduct a tender offer will be made by the Company, solely in its discretion. The public stockholders will be entitled to redeem their shares for a pro rata portion of the amount then on deposit in the Trust Account ($10.00 per share, plus any pro rata interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to the Company for working capital purposes or to pay its tax obligations). The per-share amount to be distributed to public stockholders who redeem their Public Shares will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting commissions the Company will pay to the underwriters (as discussed in Note 6). There will be no redemption rights upon the completion of a Business Combination with respect to the Company’s warrants. In such case, the Company will proceed with a Business Combination if the Company has net tangible assets of at least $5,000,001 upon such consummation of a Business Combination and a majority of the outstanding shares voted are voted in favor of the Business Combination. If a stockholder vote is not required by law and the Company does not decide to hold a stockholder vote for business or other legal reasons, the Company will, pursuant to its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, conduct the redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and file tender offer documents with the SEC prior to completing a Business Combination. If, however, stockholder approval of the transaction is required by law, or the Company decides to obtain stockholder approval for business or other legal reasons, the Company will offer to redeem shares in conjunction with a proxy solicitation pursuant to the proxy rules and not pursuant to the tender offer rules. If the Company seeks stockholder approval in connection with a Business Combination, the Sponsor, Daniel Cohen, Betsy Cohen, DGC Family FinTech Trust, Swarthmore Trust of 2016, James J. McEntee, III, Shami Patel and Jeremy Kuiper (together the “Initial Stockholders”), have agreed to vote their Founder Shares (as defined in Note 5), Placement Shares (as defined in Note 4) and any Public Shares held by them in favor of approving a Business Combination. Cantor has not committed to vote any shares held by it in favor of a Business Combination.

The Company will have until the expiration of the Combination Period to consummate its Business Combination. If the Company is unable to consummate a Business Combination within the Combination Period, the Company will (i) cease all operations except for the purposes of winding up of its affairs; (ii) distribute the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including any portion of the interest earned thereon which was not previously used for working capital or to pay dissolution expenses or taxes, pro rata to the public stockholders by way of redemption of the Public Shares (which redemption would completely extinguish such holders’ rights as stockholders, including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any); and (iii) as promptly as possible following such redemption, dissolve and liquidate the balance of the Company’s net assets to its remaining stockholders, as part of its plan of dissolution and liquidation.

The Company will also provide its stockholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their Public Shares in connection with any stockholder vote to approve an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation that would affect the substance or timing of the Company’s obligation to redeem 100% of Public Shares if it does not complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period. The stockholders will be entitled to redeem their shares for a pro rata portion of the amount then on deposit in the Trust Account ($10.00 per share, plus any pro rata interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to the Company for working capital purposes or to pay its tax obligations). There will be no redemption rights with respect to the Company’s warrants in connection with such a stockholder vote to approve such an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company may not redeem shares in an amount that would cause its net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001. The Initial Stockholders have agreed to vote their Founder Shares, Placement Shares and any Public Shares held by them in favor of any such amendment.

The Initial Stockholders and Cantor have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to the Founder Shares and Placement Shares (defined below) (i) in connection with the consummation of a Business Combination, (ii) in connection with a stockholder vote to amend the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to modify the substance or timing of the Company’s obligation to redeem 100% of its public shares if it does not complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period, and (iii) if the Company fails to consummate a Business Combination within the Combination Period or upon the Company’s liquidation prior to the expiration of the Combination Period. The Initial Stockholders have also agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to Public Shares in connection with a Business Combination and in connection with a stockholder vote to amend the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to modify the substance or timing of its obligation to redeem 100% of its Public Shares if it does not complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period. However, the Initial Stockholders will be entitled to redemption rights with respect to any Public Shares held by them if the Company fails to consummate a Business Combination or liquidates within the Combination Period. Cantor will have the same redemption rights as a public stockholder with respect to any Public Shares it acquires, however, Cantor has informed the Company that it has no current commitments, plans or intentions to acquire Public Shares for its own account. The underwriters have agreed to waive their rights to deferred underwriting commissions held in the Trust Account in the event the Company does not consummate a Business Combination within the Combination Period and, in such event, such amounts will be included with the funds held in the Trust Account that will be available to fund the redemption of the Public Shares. In the event of such distribution, it is possible that the per share value of the residual assets remaining available for distribution (including Trust Account assets) will be less than the initial public offering price per Unit in the Initial Public Offering. Placing funds in the Trust Account may not protect those funds from third party claims against the Company. Although the Company will seek to have all vendors, service providers, prospective target businesses or other entities it engages, execute agreements with the Company waiving any claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the Trust Account, there is no guarantee that such persons will execute such agreements. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer has agreed that he will be liable under certain circumstances to ensure that the proceeds in the Trust Account are not reduced by the claims of target businesses or vendors or other entities that are owed money by the Company for service rendered, contracted for or products sold to the Company. However, he may not be able to satisfy those obligations should they arise.

Notwithstanding the foregoing redemption rights, if the Company seeks stockholder approval of its Business Combination and it does not conduct redemptions in connection with its Business Combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that a public stockholder, together with any affiliate of such stockholder or any other person with whom such stockholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act), will be restricted from redeeming its shares with respect to an aggregate of 20.0% or more of the shares sold in the Initial Public Offering. However, there is no restriction on the Company’s stockholders’ ability to vote all of their shares for or against a Business Combination.

F-9

FINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 AND

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MAY 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars in conformity with accounting principles generally acceptedeconomic conditions in the United States of America, (“GAAP”)as the efforts of federal, state, local and pursuantforeign governments to react to the rulespublic health crisis with mitigation measures have created and regulationscontinue to cause significant uncertainties in the U.S. and global economy. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic affects our business, operations and financial results depends, and will continue to depend, on numerous evolving factors that we may not be able to accurately predict. Although the Company’s operations continued effectively despite social distancing and other measures taken in response to the pandemic, the ultimate impact of the SEC.

In connection withCOVID-19 pandemic on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows is dependent on future developments, including the Company's assessmentduration of going concern considerationsthe pandemic and the related extent of its severity, as well as its impact on the economic conditions, particularly the level of unemployment of our customers, which remain uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time. If the global response to contain the COVID-19 pandemic escalates further or is unsuccessful, or if governmental decisions to ease pandemic related restrictions are ineffective, premature or counterproductive, the Company could experience a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.


The consolidated financial statements of the Company include Intermex Holdings, Inc., its wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, Intermex Wire Transfer, LLC (“LLC”), Intermex Wire Transfers de Guatemala, S.A. (“Intermex Guatemala”) - 99.8% owned by LLC, Intermex Wire Transfer de Mexico, S.A. and Intermex Transfers de Mexico, S.A. (“Intermex Mexico”) - 98% owned by LLC, Intermex Wire Transfer Corp. - 100% owned by LLC, Intermex Wire Transfer II, LLC - 100% owned by LLC and Canada International Transfers Corp. - 100% owned by LLC. Non-controlling interest in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standard Board's Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-15, "Disclosuresresults of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern," management has determined thatoperations of consolidated subsidiaries represents the mandatory liquidationminority stockholders’ share of the profit or loss of Intermex Mexico and subsequent dissolution raises substantial doubt aboutIntermex Guatemala. The non-controlling interest in net assets of these subsidiaries, and the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. No adjustments have been madenet income or loss attributable to the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities shouldnon-controlling interest, were not recorded by the Company be required to liquidate after January 25, 2019.

Principles of Consolidation

as they are considered immaterial.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are presented on a consolidated basis and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-ownedmajority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompanyinter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Emerging growth company

The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”), as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and it may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

Further, section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, the Company, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of the Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of usingaccounting principles generally accepted in the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

U.S. (“GAAP”).

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of estimates

Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, andthe disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of incomerevenues and expense during the reporting periods.

Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment. It is at least reasonably possible that the estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the consolidated financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate, could change in the near term due to one or more future confirming events. Accordingly, the actualexpenses. Actual results could differ significantly from thosethese estimates.

Earnings (Loss) per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for each period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding for each period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if outstanding stock options and warrants at the presented dates are exercised and shares of restricted stock have vested, using the treasury stock method. Potential common shares are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share when the effect would be anti-dilutive. All potential common shares are anti-dilutive in periods of net loss. Stock options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and warrants are anti-dilutive when the exercise price of these instruments is greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock for the period.
Cash
Cash is comprised of deposits in U.S. and foreign banks. The Company recognizes interest income from its cash equivalents

deposits on an accrual basis. The Company considers all short-termcash equivalents to be short term, highly liquid investments with an original maturitymaturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. less.

F-7

Concentrations
The Company didmaintains certain of its cash balances in various U.S. banks, which at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has 0t incurred any losses on these accounts. In addition, the Company maintains various bank accounts in Mexico, Guatemala and Canada, which are not have any cash equivalents as ofinsured. During the year ended December 31, 20172020, the Company has 0t incurred any material losses on these uninsured foreign bank accounts, and 2016.

management believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk regarding these accounts as it performs periodic reviews of the creditworthiness of the financial institutions the Company uses. Cash balances were as follows (in thousands):

December 31,
20202019
Cash in U.S. dollars in U.S. banks$72,566 $80,736 
Cash in foreign banks and foreign currency2,332 5,372 
Petty cash
$74,907 $86,117 

A substantial portion of our paying agents are concentrated in a few large banks and marketable securities held in Trust Account

Atfinancial institutions and large retail chains. Our largest paying agent by volume accounted for approximately 18% of the Company’s total remittance volume for the years ended December 31, 2017,2020 and 2019, primarily from the assets heldU.S. to Mexico.


Revenue Recognition
Revenues for wire transfer and money order fees are recognized at the time the transaction is processed. The Company acts as the principal for these transactions as the Company controls the service at all times prior to transferring the funds to the beneficiary, is primarily responsible for fulfilling the customer contracts, has the risk of loss and has the ability to establish transaction prices. Therefore, these fees are recognized on a gross basis equal to the full amount of the fee charged to the customer. These fees also vary by transaction primarily depending upon, the principal amount sent, the send and receive locations, as well as the respective currencies of the send and receive locations. Foreign exchange gain, net, which represents the difference between the exchange rate set by the Company and the rate realized, is recognized upon the disbursement of U.S. dollars to the entities from which the Company is acquiring foreign currency. Other income primarily represents revenues for technology services provided to the independent network of agents who utilize the Company’s technology in processing transactions and check cashing services, for which revenue is derived by a fee per transaction.

Refer to Note 4 for the Trust Account were held in cashdiscussion related to revenue recognition and U.S. Treasury Bills.

F-10
additional information on the Company’s revenue.

Business Combinations

FINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 AND

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MAY 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015

Common stock subject to possible redemption

The Company accounts for its common stockbusiness combinations using the acquisition method, which requires that intangible assets be recognized apart from goodwill if they are contractual in nature or separately identifiable. Acquisitions are measured on the fair value of consideration exchanged and, if the consideration given is not cash, measurement is based on the fair value of the consideration given or the fair value of the assets acquired, whichever is more reliably measurable. The excess of cost of an acquired entity over the fair value of identifiable acquired assets and liabilities assumed is allocated to goodwill.
The valuation and allocation processes rely on significant assumptions made by management. In certain situations, the allocations of excess purchase price are based upon preliminary estimates and assumptions. Accordingly, the allocations are subject to possible redemptionrevision when the Company receives updated information, including valuations and other analyses, which are completed within one year of the acquisition. Revisions to the fair values, which may be significant, are recorded when pending information is finalized, within one year from the acquisition date.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses
Accounts receivable are recorded upon initiation of the wire transfer and are typically due to the Company within five days. The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its sending agents to make required payments. When preparing these estimates, management considers a number of factors, including the aging of a sending agent’s account, creditworthiness of specific sending agents, historical trends and other information. The Company reviews its allowance for credit losses policy periodically, reflecting current risks and changes in industry conditions and when necessary, will increase its allowance for credit losses and recognize a provision for bad debt, included in other selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Accounts receivable that are more than 90 days past due are charged off against the allowance for credit losses.
F-8

Prepaid Wires, Net
Prepaid wires, net represents funds provided to certain paying agents in advance of a transaction, net of wires pending to be picked up by the beneficiary of the money transfer.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
Prepaid expenses and other assets consist primarily of prepaid expenses, notes receivable (see Note 6) and deferred financing costs. Interest income on notes receivable is recognized on a cash basis due at the end of each calendar month, which is when the interest payments are due from the majority of the notes receivable.
Wire Transfers Payable, Net
Wire transfers payable, net represent wires pending to be picked up by the beneficiary of the money transfer net of funds provided to certain paying agents in advance of a transaction.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, including leasehold improvements, are stated at cost, or the allocated fair value in purchase accounting, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The costs of additions and betterments that substantially extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized and the expenditures for ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed in the period incurred as part of other selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvement, whichever is shorter. At the time depreciable assets are retired or otherwise disposed, the cost and the related accumulated depreciation of such assets are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss is recognized in the current period. The Company capitalizes costs incurred for the development of internal use computer software, which are depreciated over five years using the straight-line method.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Intangible assets result primarily from business combination acquisitions. Intangible assets include agent relationships, trade name, developed technology and other intangibles, all with finite lives. Other intangibles primarily relate to the acquisition of certain agent locations. Upon the acquisition, the purchase price is first allocated to identifiable assets and liabilities, including the trade name and other intangibles, with any remaining purchase price recorded as goodwill.
Goodwill is not amortized, rather, an impairment test is conducted on an annual basis, at the beginning of the fourth quarter, or more frequently if indicators of impairment are present. For purposes of the annual impairment test, management initially performs a qualitative assessment, which includes consideration of the economic, industry and market conditions in addition to our overall financial performance and the performance of these assets. If our qualitative assessment does not conclude that it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is greater than the carrying value, we perform a quantitative analysis. In a quantitative test, the fair value of a reporting unit is determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis. A discounted cash flow analysis requires us to make various assumptions, including assumptions about future cash flows, growth rates and discount rates. The assumptions about future cash flows and growth rates are based on our long-term projections. Assumptions used in our impairment testing are consistent with our internal forecasts and operating plans. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, there is no impairment. If not, we compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount. To the extent the carrying amount exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment charge would be necessary.
The Company’s agent relationships, trade name and developed technology are amortized utilizing an accelerated method over their estimated useful lives of 15 years. Other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over a useful life of 10 years. The Company reviews for impairment indicators of finite-lived intangibles and other long-lived assets as described below in “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.”
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Upon such an occurrence, recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to forecasted undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. For long-lived assets held for sale, assets are written down to fair value, less cost to sell. Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flows, appraised values or management’s estimates, depending upon the nature of the assets.
F-9

Debt Origination Costs
The Company incurred debt origination costs related to the credit agreement, consisting of a term loan and a revolving credit facility and amortizes these costs over the life of the related debt using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. The unamortized portion of debt origination costs related to the term loan is recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as an offset to the related debt, while deferred up-front commitment fees paid directly to the lender related to the revolving credit facility are recorded within other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Amortization of debt origination costs is included as a component of interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are included in other selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and are expensed as incurred. The Company incurred advertising costs of approximately $0.4 million, $1.2 million and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.” Common stock subject to mandatory redemption (if any) is classified as a liability instrument and isGAAP which require, among other things, recognition of future tax benefits measured at fair value. Conditionally redeemable common stock (including common stock that features redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subjectenacted rates attributable to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control) is classified asdeductible temporary equity. At all other times, common stock is classified as stockholders’ equity. The Company’s common stock features certain redemption rights that are considered to be outside of the Company’s control and subject to occurrence of uncertain future events. Accordingly, at December 31, 2017, 16,112,706 shares of common stock subject to possible redemption is presented as temporary equity, outside of the stockholders’ equity section on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

Offering costs

Offering costs consist principally of legal, accounting and underwriting costs incurred that were directly related to the Initial Public Offering. Offering costs amounting to $12,912,088 were charged to stockholders’ equity upon completion of the Initial Public Offering. 

Income taxes

The Company complies with the accounting and reporting requirements of ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” which requires an asset and liability approach to financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities and to tax net operating loss carryforwards to the extent that will result in future taxablerealization of said benefits is more likely than not.

The Company accounts for tax contingencies by assessing all material positions, including all significant uncertain positions, for all tax years that are open to assessment or deductible amounts,challenge under tax statutes. Those positions that have only timing consequences are separately analyzed based on enactedthe recognition and measurement model provided in the tax guidance.
As required by the uncertain tax position guidance, the Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of a position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more likely-than-not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority. The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and rates applicableregulations and require significant judgment to apply. The Company applies the periods inuncertain tax position guidance to all tax positions for which the differencesstatute of limitations remains open. The Company’s policy is to classify interest accrued as interest expense and penalties as other selling, general and administrative expenses.

Foreign subsidiaries of the Company are expectedsubject to affect taxable income. Valuation allowancestaxes by local tax authorities.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions
The financial statements and transactions of the Company’s foreign operations are established, when necessary,maintained in their functional currency, which is other than the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities are translated at current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate for each period. Translation adjustments, which result from the process of translating the financial statements of the Company’s foreign operations into U.S. dollars, are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Gains from foreign currency transactions amounted to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

ASC Topic 740 prescribes a recognition thresholdapproximately $217.6 thousand, $41.0 thousand and a measurement attribute$29.8 thousand for the financial statement recognitionyears ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and measurement2018, respectively, and are included in other selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of tax positions taken or expected to be takenoperations and comprehensive income (loss).

We manage foreign currency risk through the structure of the business and an active risk management process. We currently settle with our payers in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examinationLatin America primarily by taxing authorities.entering into foreign exchange spot transactions with local and foreign currency providers (“counterparties”). The foreign currency exposure on our foreign exchange spot transactions is limited by the fact that all transactions are settled within 2 business days from trade date. Foreign currency fluctuations, however, may negatively affect our average exchange gain per transaction. The Company recognizes accrued interesthad open spot foreign exchange contracts for Mexico and penalties relatedGuatemala amounting to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. There were no unrecognized tax benefitsapproximately $42.5 million and no amounts accrued for interest$2.5 million at December 31, 2020 and penalties2019, respectively.
In addition, included in wire transfers and money orders payable, net in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019, there are $7.6 million and $12.6 million, respectively, of wire transfers payable denominated in foreign currencies, primarily in Mexican pesos and Guatemalan quetzales.
Also, included in prepaid wires, net in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, there are $50.1 million and $16.4 million, respectively, of prepaid wires denominated in foreign currencies, primarily in Mexican pesos and Guatemalan quetzales.
F-10

Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income (loss) and the foreign currency translation adjustment and is presented in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Share-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for its share-based compensation expense related to stock options and RSUs under GAAP, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation costs for all equity-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values. We have elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. See Note 14 for further discussion related to the Company’s share-based compensation plans.
Segments
The Company’s business is organized around 1 reportable segment that provides money transmittal services between the U.S. and Canada to Mexico, Guatemala and other countries in Latin America, Africa and Asia through a network of authorized agents located in various unaffiliated retail establishments and 34 Company-operated stores throughout the U.S. and Canada. This is based on the objectives of the business and how our chief operating decision maker, the CEO and President, monitors operating performance and allocates resources.
Accounting Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued amended guidance, Intangibles – Goodwill and other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The amended standard simplifies how an entity tests goodwill by eliminating Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test related to measuring an impairment charge. Instead, impairment will be recorded for the amount that the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. This new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2021. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The FASB issued amended guidance, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. The amended standard requires implementation costs incurred by customers in cloud computing arrangements to be deferred and recognized over the term of the arrangement, if those costs would be capitalized by the customers in a software licensing arrangement. This new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2021. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The FASB issued guidance, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (Topic 740), which removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and improves consistent application of and simplifies GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. This new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2021. The Company will adopt this guidance on a prospective basis and it is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The FASB issued guidance, Leases (Topic 842), to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for those leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. The guidance requires that a lessee recognizes a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term on the balance sheet. This guidance is required to be adopted by the Company on January 1, 2022 using the modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements.
The FASB issued guidance, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, regarding the measurement of credit losses for certain financial instruments. The new standard replaces the incurred loss model with a current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model. The CECL model is based on historical experience, adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The Company is required to adopt the new guidance on January 1, 2023. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements.
F-11

The FASB issued guidance, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, which provides optional expedient and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. In response to the concerns about structural risks of interbank offered rates (“IBORs”) and, particularly, the risk of cessation of the LIBOR, regulators in several jurisdictions around the world have undertaken reference rate reform initiatives to identify alternative reference rates that are more observable or transaction based and less susceptible to manipulation. This accounting standards update provides companies with optional guidance to ease the potential accounting burden associated with transitioning away from reference rates that are expected to be discontinued. This new guidance may be adopted by the Company no later than December 1, 2022, with early adoption permitted. The potential adoption of this guidance is not awareexpected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior-year amounts to conform with current-year presentation.
NOTE 3 – FINTECH MERGER
FinTech Merger
On July 26, 2018, the Company (formerly known as Fintech Acquisition Corp. II) consummated the merger transaction (the “Merger”), by and among FinTech Acquisition Corp. II, a Delaware corporation (“FinTech”), FinTech II Merger Sub Inc., FinTech II Merger Sub 2 LLC, Intermex Holdings II, Inc. (“Intermex”) and SPC Intermex Representative LLC, which was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization.

Immediately prior to the Merger, FinTech’s shareholders exercised their right to redeem certain of their outstanding shares for cash, resulting in the redemption of 4.9 million shares of FinTech for gross redemption payments of $49.8 million. Subsequent to this redemption, there were 18.9 million outstanding shares. The aggregate consideration paid in the Merger by FinTech to the Intermex shareholders consisted of approximately (i) $102.0 million in cash and (ii) 17.2 million shares of FinTech common stock. In accounting for the reverse recapitalization, the net cash proceeds received from FinTech amounted to $5.0 thousand as shown in the table below (in thousands):
Cash balance available to Intermex prior to the consummation of the Merger$110,726 
Less:
Intermex Merger costs paid from acquisition proceeds at closing(9,062)
Cash consideration to Intermex shareholders(101,659)
Net cash proceeds from reverse recapitalization$
Cash balance available to Intermex prior to the consummation of the Merger$110,726 
Less:
Cash consideration to Intermex shareholders(101,659)
Other FinTech assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Merger:
Prepaid expenses76 
Accrued liabilities(136)
Deferred tax assets (1)
982 
Net equity infusion from FinTech$9,989 
(1) The Company acquired approximately $1.0 million of deferred tax assets from FinTech. These deferred tax assets relate to capitalized transaction costs incurred by FinTech prior to the Merger; therefore, they were recorded through APIC and are amortizable on the Company’s post-Merger tax returns over a period of 15 years.
Transaction Costs
Direct costs related to the Merger were expensed as incurred and included as “transaction costs” in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Transaction costs included all internal and external costs directly related to the Merger, consisting primarily of legal, consulting, accounting, advisory and financing fees and certain incentive bonuses. Transaction costs for the year ended December 31, 2018 amounted to $10.3 million and related specifically to the Merger. There were 0 transaction costs for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.


F-12

NOTE 4 – REVENUE

On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the new accounting standard, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, as amended, which modified the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. The guidance establishes that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services, that is, the satisfaction of performance obligations, to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance establishes a five-step model to determine when revenue recognition is appropriate. The Company adopted the guidance using the modified retrospective approach recording the cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the consolidated balance sheet, amounting to $1.0 million, net of tax, with a corresponding increase to deferred revenue liability, included within accrued and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. In accordance with the modified retrospective approach, the 2018 comparative information was not restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for that year.
The Company recognized in revenues from contracts with customers for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the following (in thousands):
December 31,
20202019
 Wire transfer and money order fees$308,850 $274,161 
 Discounts and promotions(941)(1,080)
 Wire transfer and money order fees, net307,909 273,081 
 Foreign exchange gain, net46,763 44,268 
 Other income2,537 2,252 
 Total revenues$357,209 $319,601 

There are no significant initial costs incurred to obtain contracts with customers, although the Company has a loyalty program under which customers earn 1 point for each wire transfer completed. Points can be redeemed for a discounted wire transaction fee or higher foreign exchange rate. The discounts vary by country, and the earned points expire if the customer has not initiated and completed an eligible wire transfer transaction within the immediately preceding 180-day period. In addition, earned points will expire 30 days after the end of the program. Therefore, because the loyalty program benefits represent a future performance obligation, a portion of the initial consideration is recorded as deferred revenue loyalty program (see Note 10) and a corresponding loyalty program expense is recorded as contra revenue. Revenue from this performance obligation is recognized upon customers redeeming points or upon expiration of any issues under reviewpoints outstanding.
Based on our assessment of the new standard, except for the loyalty program discussed above, we have determined that couldour revenues include only 1 performance obligation, which is to collect the consumer’s money and make funds available for payment, generally on the same day, to a designated recipient in the currency requested. As part of the adoption of ASC 606, the loyalty program reserve balance as of January 1, 2019 of $0.6 million, was credited to accumulated deficit as this became part of the beginning balance of the new deferred revenue loyalty program liability.
NOTE 5 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND NOTES RECEIVABLE, NET OF ALLOWANCE

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable represents outstanding balances from sending agents for pending wire transfers or money orders from our customers. The outstanding balance, net of allowance for credit losses, consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
20202019
Accounts receivable$56,520 $40,513 
Allowance for credit losses(1,503)(759)
Accounts receivable, net$55,017 $39,754 




Notes Receivable

The Company had notes receivable, net of allowance for credit losses, from sending agents as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
20202019
Notes receivable, current$710 $1,005 
Allowance for credit losses(244)(357)
Net current$466 $648 
Notes receivable, long-term$816 $311 
Allowance for credit losses(295)(120)
Net long-term$521 $191 

The net current portion is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and the net long-term portion is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. The notes have interest rates ranging from 0% to 15.5% per annum. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, there were $1.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively, of notes collateralized by personal guarantees from the sending agents and assets from their businesses in case of a default by the agent.
The maturities of notes receivable at December 31, 2020 are as follows (in thousands):
Unpaid
Principle
Balance
Under 1 year$710 
Between 1 and 2 years459 
Between 2 and 3 years357 
Total$1,526 

Allowance for Credit Losses
The changes in the allowance for credit losses related to accounts receivable and notes receivable are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Beginning balance$1,236 $1,290 $990 
Provision1,801 1,626 1,236 
Charge-offs(1,491)(1,972)(1,438)
Recoveries496 292 502 
Ending Balance$2,042 $1,236 $1,290 

The allowance for credit losses allocated by financial instrument category is as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
202020192018
Accounts receivable$1,503 $759 $842 
Notes receivable539 477 448 
Allowance for credit losses$2,042 $1,236 $1,290 

F-14

NOTE 6 – PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
20202019
Prepaid insurance$465 $404 
Prepaid fees and services1,452 1,609 
Notes receivable, net of allowance466 648 
Assets pending settlement218 214 
Prepaid taxes103 1,025 
Prepaid expenses and current assets - other817 255 
$3,521 $4,155 

NOTE 7 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31,Estimated
Useful Life
(in years)
20202019
Computer software and equipment$22,337 $19,630 3 to 5
Office improvements1,122 1,225 5
Furniture and fixtures506 500 7
23,965 21,355 
Less accumulated depreciation(10,944)(8,073)
$13,021 $13,282 

Computer software and equipment above includes equipment assigned and used by sending agents of approximately $11.0 million and $9.3 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Also, it includes internal use software of approximately $2.8 million and $2.4 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Depreciation expense included in depreciation and amortization expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) was approximately $3.9 million, $3.3 million and $3.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Repairs and maintenance expenses included in other selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) were approximately $2.0 million, $1.7 million and $1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
NOTE 8 – GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
20202019
Indefinite life:
Goodwill$36,260 $36,260 
Total indefinite life$36,260 $36,260 

F-15

Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Gross Carrying
Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Value
Gross
Carrying
Value
Accumulated AmortizationNet
Carrying
Value
Amortizable:
Agent relationships$40,500 $(29,759)$10,741 $40,500 $(25,259)$15,241 
Trade name15,500 (7,964)7,536 15,500 (6,308)9,192 
Developed technology6,600 (5,234)1,366 6,600 (4,550)2,050 
Other intangibles1,155 (368)787 1,155 (257)898 
Net amortizable intangible assets$63,755 $(43,325)$20,430 $63,755 $(36,374)$27,381 

Goodwill and the majority of intangible assets on the consolidated balance sheets of the Company were recognized from a prior acquisition. The fair value measurements were based on significant inputs, such as the Company’s forecasted revenues, assumed turnover of agent locations, obsolescence assumptions for technology, market discount and royalty rates. These inputs are based on information not observable in the market and represent Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. Trade name refers to the Intermex name, branded on all agent locations and well recognized in the market. This fair value was determined using the relief-from-royalty method, which is based on the Company’s expected revenues and a royalty rate estimated using comparable market data. The Company determined it was appropriate to assign a finite useful life of 15 years to the trade name to provide better matching of the amortization expense during the period of expected benefits.
The agent relationships intangible represents the network of independent sending agents. This intangible was valued using the excess earnings method, which was based on the Company’s forecasts and historical activity at agent locations in order to develop a turnover rate and expected useful life. Assuming a year-over-year location turnover rate of 17.4%, this resulted in an expected useful life for this intangible of 15 years. Developed technology includes the state-of-the-art system that the Company has continued to develop and improve upon over the past 20 years. This intangible was valued using the relief-from-royalty method based on the Company’s forecasted revenues, a royalty rate estimated using comparable market data, an expected obsolescence rate of 18.0% and an estimated useful life of 15 years. Other intangibles primarily relate to the acquisition of Company-operated stores, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over 10 years. The net book value of these intangibles was $0.8 million and $0.9 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Management believes it has made reasonable estimates and judgments concerning these risks and uncertainties. A change in the conditions, circumstances or strategy of the Company may result in significant payments, accruals or material deviationa need to recognize an impairment charge.
As a result of the annual impairment tests, the Company determined that goodwill was 0t impaired as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The following table presents the changes in goodwill and intangible assets (in thousands):
GoodwillIntangible Assets
Balance at December 31, 2017$36,260 $48,741 
Acquisition of agent locations120 
Amortization expense(12,466)
Balance at December 31, 2018$36,260 $36,395 
Acquisition of agent locations335 
Amortization expense(9,349)
Balance at December 31, 2019$36,260 $27,381 
Amortization expense(6,951)
Balance at December 31, 2020$36,260 $20,430 

Amortization expense related to intangible assets for the next five years and thereafter is as follows (in thousands):
F-16

2021$5,161 
20223,997 
20232,989 
20242,270 
20251,717 
Thereafter4,296 
$20,430 

NOTE 9 – WIRE TRANSFERS AND MONEY ORDERS PAYABLE, NET

Wire transfers and money orders payable, net, consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
20202019
Wire transfers payable, net$11,806 $16,058 
Customer voided wires payable13,374 10,937 
Money orders payable16,566 13,202 
$41,746 $40,197 

Customer voided wires payable consist of wire transfers that were not completed because the recipient did not collect the funds within 30 days and the sender has not claimed the funds and, therefore, are considered unclaimed property. Unclaimed property laws of each state in the United States in which we operate, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico require us to track certain information for all of our money remittances and payment instruments and, if the funds underlying such remittances and instruments are unclaimed at the end of an applicable statutory abandonment period, require us to remit the proceeds of the unclaimed property to the appropriate jurisdiction. Applicable statutory abandonment periods range from its position.

three to seven years.

NOTE 10 – ACCRUED AND OTHER LIABILITIES
Accrued and other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
20202019
Commissions payable to sending agents$12,500 $10,124 
Accrued legal settlement (see Note 17)3,250 
Accrued salaries and benefits2,957 2,374 
Accrued bank charges1,170 976 
Accrued legal fees75 120 
Accrued other professional fees826 655 
Accrued taxes1,276 2,345 
Deferred revenue loyalty program2,750 2,495 
Other826 735 
$22,380 $23,074 

The following table shows the changes in the deferred revenue loyalty program liability (in thousands):

Balance, December 31, 2018$
Adoption of ASC 6061,976 
Revenue deferred during the year2,618 
Revenue recognized during the year(2,099)
Balance, December 31, 20192,495 
Revenue deferred during the year1,806 
Revenue recognized during the year(1,551)
Balance, December 31, 2020$2,750 

F-17

NOTE 11 – DEBT
Debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
20202019
Term loan$89,383 $97,044 
89,383 97,044 
Less: Current portion of long term debt (1)
(7,044)(7,044)
Less: Debt origination costs(1,760)(2,377)
$80,579 $87,623 
(1)Current portion of long-term debt is net of debt origination costs of approximately $0.6 million both at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries as borrowers (the “Loan Parties”) entered into a financing agreement (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”) with a group of banking institutions. The Credit Agreement provides for a $35 million revolving credit facility, a $90 million term loan facility and an up to $30 million incremental facility of which $12 million was utilized in the second quarter of 2019. The Credit Agreement also provides for the issuance of letters of credit, which would reduce availability under the revolving credit facility. The maturity date of the Credit Agreement is November 7, 2023. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, there were 0 outstanding amounts drawn on the revolving credit facility.
Interest on the term loan facility and revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement is determined by reference to either LIBOR or a “base rate”, in each case plus an applicable margin of 4.50% per annum for LIBOR loans or 3.50% per annum for base rate loans. The Company is also required to pay a fee on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility equal to 0.35% per annum. The effective interest rates for the year ended December 31, 2020 for the term loan facility and revolving credit facility were 5.78% and 1.00%, respectively.
The principal amount of the term loan facility under the Credit Agreement must be repaid in consecutive quarterly installments of 5.0% in year 1, 7.5% in years 2 and 3, and 10.0% in years 4 and 5, in each case on the last day of each quarter, which commenced in March 2019 with a final balloon payment at maturity. The loans under the Credit Agreement may be prepaid at any time without premium or penalty.
The Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a quarterly minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25:1.00 and a quarterly maximum consolidated leverage ratio of 3.25:1.00.
The Credit Agreement also contains covenants that limit the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, grant liens, incur additional indebtedness, make acquisitions or investments, dispose of certain assets, change the nature of their businesses, enter into certain transactions with affiliates or amend the terms of material indebtedness.
In addition, the Credit Agreement establishes certain restrictions on payment of dividends or cash distributions other than for certain purposes, including the following: i) to pay cash dividends to the Company in an amount necessary to cover reasonable and customary corporate and operating expenses, ii) to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire warrants, right or options on the Company’s common stock of an aggregate amount of up to $10 million plus the Available Amount (as defined in the Credit Agreement), iii) to repurchase the Company’s common stock from current or former employees in an aggregate amount of up to $5 million per calendar year, and iv) other restricted payments in an aggregate amount not to exceed $5 million plus the Available Amount.
As a result of the restrictions described above, among others, substantially all of the Company’s subsidiaries’ net assets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 are considered restricted net assets.
The obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the Company and certain domestic subsidiaries of the Company and secured by liens on substantially all of the assets of the Loan Parties, subject to potential examination by federal, state,certain exclusions and city taxing authoritieslimitations.
On April 20, 2020, the Company received funds under the Paycheck Protection Program (the “Program”) in the areas of income taxes. These potential examinations may include questioning the timing and amount of deductions,$3.5 million. Although the nexusCompany believes that it met all eligibility criteria for a loan under the Program at the time of its application, subsequent to receiving the funds, the Small Business Administration (“SBA”), in consultation with the Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”),
F-18

provided additional guidance to address public, borrower and lender questions concerning the eligibility criteria under the Program. Based on this guidance provided by the SBA and Treasury, the Company returned the funds received under the Program on April 29, 2020.
The scheduled annual payments of the term loan at December 31, 2020 are as follows (in thousands):
2021$7,661 
202210,215 
202371,507 
$89,383 

During 2019, the Company capitalized debt origination costs of approximately $0.2 million related to the incremental facility. During 2018, the Company capitalized debt origination costs of approximately $3.5 million related to the Credit Agreement. NaN debt origination costs were incurred during 2020.
The unamortized portion of debt origination costs totaled approximately $2.2 million and $2.9 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Amortization of debt origination costs is included as a component of interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income among various tax jurisdictions,(loss) and complianceamounted to approximately $0.8 million, $0.7 million and $4.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
NOTE 12 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company determines fair value in accordance with federal, state,the provisions of FASB guidance, Fair Value Measurements and city tax laws. Disclosures, which defines fair value as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value was established. There are three levels of inputs used to measure fair value and for disclosure purposes. Level 1 relates to quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 relates to observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1. Level 3 relates to unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The Company’s non-financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include goodwill and intangibles assets. The determination of our intangible fair values includes several assumptions and inputs (Level 3) that are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Management believes it has made reasonable estimates and judgments concerning these risks and uncertainties. All other financial assets and liabilities are carried at amortized cost.
The Company’s cash balances are representative of their fair values as these balances are comprised of deposits available on demand. The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, prepaid wires, accounts payable and wire transfers and money orders payable are representative of their fair values because of the short turnover of these items.
The Company’s financial liabilities include its revolving credit facility and term loan. The fair value of the term loan, which approximates book value, is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using a current market interest rate. The estimated fair value of the revolving credit facility would approximate face value given the payment schedule and interest rate structure, which approximates current market interest rates.
NOTE 13 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
From January 1, 2018 through July 26, 2018, Intermex paid a monthly management doesfee of $65.0 thousand, plus reimbursement of expenses, to a related party for management services, which is included in other selling, general and administrative expenses on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). On July 26, 2018, the management fee agreement with the related party was terminated, and a one-time termination fee of $1.6 million was included as part of transaction costs in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2018. There were 0 amounts payable to or receivable from related parties included in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
NOTE 14 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Common Stock and Secondary Offerings
On the Closing Date of the Merger, there were 36.2 million shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding and outstanding warrants to purchase approximately 9 million shares of common stock. As of the Closing Date, the former stockholders of Intermex owned approximately 48.3% and the former stockholders of FinTech owned approximately 51.7% of the combined company’s outstanding common stock. At December 31, 2020, the Company was authorized to issue 230.0 million shares of common stock and had approximately 38.2 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding at $0.0001 par value per common share.
F-19

In September 2020 and 2019, the Company conducted unwritten secondary public offerings in which certain selling stockholders sold an aggregate of 5.7 million shares of the Company’s common stock, at a price to the public of $13.50 and 6.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock, at a price to the public of $12.75 per share. The Company did 0t receive any of the proceeds from these offerings; however, it did incur approximately $0.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, in certain costs, which are included in other selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
Equity Warrants
Prior to the Merger, FinTech issued 8.8 million public warrants (“Public Warrants”) and 0.2 million private placement warrants (“Placement Warrants” and together with the Public Warrants, the “Warrants”). The Company assumed the Warrants upon the change of control event. As a result of the Merger, the Warrants issued by FinTech were no longer exercisable for shares of FinTech common stock but instead were exercisable for common stock of the Company. All other features of the Warrants remained unchanged. There were no cash obligations for the Company pertaining to these Warrants.

Each whole Warrant entitled the holder to purchase 1 share of the Company’s common stock at a price of $11.50 per share. The Warrants became exercisable 30 days after the completion of the Merger and were to expire 5 years after that date, or earlier upon redemption or liquidation.
All of the Warrants were eliminated through a tender offer and mandatory conversion that resulted in the issuance, between April and May of 2019 of approximately 1.8 million shares of common stock and the payment by the Company of approximately $10.0 million in cash in exchange for the Warrants tendered in the tender offer (the “Warrants Offer”). These transactions resulted in the Company having a total of approximately 38.0 million shares of common stock outstanding following the issuance. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company incurred approximately $0.9 million in professional and legal fees related to the Warrants Offer, which are included in other selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

International Money Express, Inc. Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans
On June 26, 2020, at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Company’s stockholders approved the International Money Express, Inc. 2020 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “2020 Plan”), which provides for the granting of stock-based incentive awards, including stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”), to employees and independent directors of the Company. There are 3.4 million shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the 2020 Plan, including 0.4 million shares that were available for grant under the International Money Express, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “2018 Plan” and together with the 2020 Plan, the “Plans”). As of December 31, 2020, there are 0.3 million stock options and 0.1 million RSUs granted under the 2020 Plan. Although outstanding awards under the 2018 Plan remain, the 2018 Plan was terminated upon effectiveness of the 2020 Plan.

Stock Options
The value of each option grant is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model (“BSM”). The option pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the grant date fair value of our common stock, expected volatility, risk-free interest rates, expected term and expected dividend yield. To determine the grant date fair value of the Company’s common stock, we use the closing market price of our common stock at the grant date. We also use an expected volatility based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock and the “simplified” method for calculating the expected life of our stock options as the options are “plain vanilla” and we do not expect thathave any significant historical post-vesting activity. We have elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. The risk-free interest rates are obtained from publicly available U.S. Treasury yield curve rates.
The Company used the total amountfollowing assumptions for the BSM to determine the fair value of the stock options:
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Weighted-average grant date price of our common stock (per share)$12.94 $13.83 
Weighted-average expected volatility45.2 %28.6 %
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate0.5 %1.7 %
Expected term (in years)6.256.25
Expected dividend yield0.0 %0.0 %
Share-based compensation is recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. The stock options issued under the Plans have 10-year terms and vest in 4 equal annual installments beginning one year after the date of the grant. The Company recognized compensation expense for stock options of approximately $2.8 million, $2.6 million and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which is included in salaries and benefits in the
F-20

consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). As of December 31, 2020, there were 2.7 million outstanding stock options and unrecognized compensation expense of approximately $5.9 million is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
A summary of the stock option activity during the year ended December 31, 2020 is presented below:
Number of
Options
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
 Weighted-Average
Remaining Contractual
Term (Years)
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 20192,905,219 $10.51 8.74$3.58 
Granted622,500 $12.94 $5.71 
Exercised(1)
(218,383)$10.24 $3.51 
Forfeited(594,434)$11.07 $3.82 
Outstanding at December 31, 20202,714,902 $10.97 8.19$4.03 
Exercisable at December 31, 2020(2)
1,137,451 $10.17 7.64$3.50 

(1) The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2020 was $1.3 million.
(2) The aggregate fair value of all vested/exercisable options outstanding as of December 31, 2020 was $17.7 million.
RSU Grants to Employees

The RSUs granted under the Plans to the Company’s employees generally vest in 4 equal annual installments beginning one year after the date of the grant. The Company recognized compensation expense for RSUs granted to employees of approximately $4.1 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2020, which is included in salaries and benefits in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). There was 0 compensation expense recognized for RSUs granted to employees in 2019 and 2018. As of December 31, 2020, unrecognized compensation expense of approximately $0.1 million is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.8 years.

A summary of the RSU grant activity to employees of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2020 is presented below:

Number of RSU awardsWeighted-Average
Grant Price
Nonvested at December 31, 2019$
Granted17,500 $14.87 
Forfeited(10,000)$15.15 
Nonvested at December 31, 20207,500 $14.49 

RSU Grants to Independent Directors

The RSUs granted under the Plans to the Company’s independent directors vest on the one-year anniversary from the grant date. The Company recognized compensation expense for the RSUs granted to independent directors of $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which is included in salaries and benefits in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). As of December 31, 2020, there was $0.3 million of unrecognized taxcompensation expense for the RSUs. There were 0 forfeitures of RSUs granted to independent directors for the year ended December 31, 2020.


F-21

A summary of the RSU grant activity to independent directors of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2020 is presented below:
Number of RSU awardsWeighted-Average
Grant Price
Nonvested at December 31, 201918,953 $14.77 
Granted33,381 $13.13 
Vested(18,953)$14.77 
Nonvested at December 31, 202033,381 $13.13 

Under the 2020 Plan, effective October 1, 2020, the Lead Independent Director and Chairs of the Committees of the Board of Directors are granted, in aggregate, $64.0 thousand in awards of fully vested shares of the Company’s common stock, payable on a quarterly basis at the end of each quarter.

Incentive Units
Prior to the Merger, incentive units amounting to $4.7 million were granted to our employees, which became fully vested as a result of the Merger in 2018 and were immediately recognized as share-based compensation expense, which is included in salaries and benefits will materially change overin the next twelve months.

Net lossconsolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2018.

NOTE 15 – EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic earnings (loss) per common share

The Company complies with the accounting and disclosure requirements of ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share.” Net loss per common share is computedcalculated by dividing net lossincome (loss) for the year by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding sharesperiod. In computing dilutive earnings (loss) per share, basic earnings (loss) per share is adjusted for the assumed issuance of all applicable potentially dilutive share-based awards, including common stock forfeited by certainoptions, RSUs and warrants.


Below are basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except for share data):

Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Net income (loss) for basic and diluted income (loss) per common share$33,784 $19,609 $(7,244)
Shares:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding – basic38,060,290 37,428,345 25,484,386 
Effect of dilutive securities
RSUs10,566 12,416 
Stock options287,315 140,640 
Warrants12,757 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding – diluted38,358,171 37,594,158 25,484,386 
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic$0.89 $0.52 $(0.28)
Earnings (loss) per common share - diluted$0.88 $0.52 $(0.28)

As of the Company’s Initial Shareholders on January 25, 2017. Shares of common stock subject to possible redemption at December 31, 2017 have been2020, there were 688.2 thousand options and 10.9 thousand RSUs excluded from the calculation of basic lossdiluted earnings per share since such shares, if redeemed, only participate in their pro ratacalculation because, under the treasury stock method, the inclusion of these would be anti-dilutive.
As of December 31, 2019, there were 471.8 thousand options and 19.0 thousand RSUs excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because, under the treasury stock method, the inclusion of the Trust Account earnings.these would be anti-dilutive. The Company has not considered the effect of warrants to purchase 8,960,000 shares of common stockWarrants were included in the calculation of the diluted lossearnings per share, since the exercise of the warrants is contingent upon the occurrence of future events. As a result, diluted loss per common share is the same as basic loss per common share for the periods presented.

Concentrationfor which they were outstanding; the shares issued in exchange for the Warrants tendered in the Warrants Offer were included in the basic earnings per share beginning on the date the shares were issued. All Warrants ceased to exist after they were tendered in the Warrants Offer.

As of credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist of a cash account in a financial institution which, at times may exceed the Federal depository insurance coverage of $250,000. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had not experienced losses on this account and management believes the Company is not exposed2018, there were 2.9 million options, 9.0 million warrants to significant risks on such account.

Fair value of financial instruments

The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities, which qualify as financial instruments under ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” approximates the carrying amounts represented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, primarily due to their short-term nature.

Recently issued accounting standards

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

F-11

FINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 AND

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MAY 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015

3. INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING

On January 25, 2017, the Company sold 17,500,000 Units at a purchase price of $10.00 per Unit, which included a partial exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option in the amount of 2,200,000 Units at $10.00 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one shareshares of the Company’s common stock and one-half21.2 thousand RSUs excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because, under the treasury stock method, the inclusion of one whole warrant (“Public Warrant”). Each whole Public Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $11.50 (see Note 7). No fractional Public Warrants were issued upon separationthese would be anti-dilutive.

F-22

NOTE 16 - INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes consists of the Unitsfollowing (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Current tax provision:
Foreign$224 $201 $212 
Federal8,080 4,668 1,283 
State2,780 1,591 182 
Total Current11,084 6,460 1,677 
Deferred tax provision:
Federal1,089 1,290 93 
State344 573 98 
Total deferred1,433 1,863 191 
Total tax provision:$12,517 $8,323 $1,868 

A reconciliation between the income tax provision (benefit) at the U.S. statutory tax rate and only whole Public Warrants trade.

4. PRIVATE PLACEMENT

Simultaneous with the Initial Public Offering,Company’s income tax provision on the Sponsorconsolidated statements of operations and Cantor purchased an aggregatecomprehensive income (loss) is below (in thousands):


Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Income (loss) before income taxes$46,301 $27,932 $(5,376)
U.S. statutory tax rate21 %21 %21 %
Income tax expense (benefit) at statutory rate9,723 5,866 (1,129)
State tax expense, net of federal2,530 1,639 145 
Foreign tax rates different from U.S. statutory rate264 260 146 
Non-deductible expenses57 374 1,978 
Write-off of transaction costs321 
Write-off of net operating losses314 
Change in tax rate(9)71 76 
Other(48)113 17 
Total tax provision$12,517 $8,323 $1,868 

As presented in the income tax reconciliation above, the tax provision recognized on the consolidated statements of 420,000 Placement Units (390,000 Placement Unitsoperations and comprehensive income (loss) was impacted by state taxes, non-deductible expenses, such as offering costs, share-based compensation expense, transaction costs and foreign tax rates applicable to the SponsorCompany’s foreign subsidiaries that are higher or lower than the U.S. statutory rate. The Company is subject to tax in various U.S. state jurisdictions. Changes in the annual allocation and 30,000 Placement Units by Cantor) at a price of $10.00 per Unit (or an aggregate purchase price of $4,200,000). Each Placement Unit consists of one share of common stock (“Placement Share”) and one-half of one warrant (each, a “Placement Warrant”) to purchase one shareapportionment of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $11.50. The proceeds from the Placement Units and the proceeds from the Initial Public Offering totaling $175,000,000 are heldactivity amongst these state jurisdictions results in the Trust Account. There will be no redemption rights or liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respectchanges to the Placement Shares or Placement Warrants.

The Placement Unitsblended state rate utilized to measure the Company’s deferred tax assets and their component securitiesliabilities.


F-23

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the same asexpected tax consequences of temporary differences between the public unitsbook and their component securities except that they may not be transferable, assignable or salable until 30 days after the consummation of an initial Business Combination, subject to certain limited exceptions.

5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Founder Shares

On May 28, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,298,333 shares of common stock to the Initial Stockholders (“Founder Shares”) for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000. In January 2017, the Company issued an additional 701,667 Founder Shares for an aggregate purchase price of $3,311. As such, total Founder Shares of 6,000,000 included an aggregate of up to 760,000 shares subject to forfeiture by the Initial Stockholders to the extent that the underwriters’ over-allotment was not exercised in full or in part, so that the Initial Stockholders would collectively own 25%tax bases of the Company’s issuedassets and outstanding shares afterliabilities. The following table outlines the Initial Public Offering. As a resultprincipal components of the underwriters’ election to exercise their over-allotment option to purchase 2,200,000 Units on January 25, 2017deferred tax assets and waiver of the remainder of their over-allotment option, 733,333 Founder Shares were no longer subject to forfeiture and 26,667 Founder Shares were forfeited. Accordingly, a total of 5,973,333 Founder Shares are outstanding as of December 31, 2017.

The Initial Stockholders have agreed not to transfer, assign or sell any of their Founder Shares (except to permitted transferees) until (i) with respect to 20% of such shares, upon consummation of the Company’s initial Business Combination, (ii) with respect to 20% of such shares, when the closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $12.00 for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period following the consummation of a Business Combination, (iii) with respect to 20% of such shares, when the closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $13.50 for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period following the consummation of a Business Combination, (iv) with respect to 20% of such shares, when the closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $15.00 for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period following the consummation of a Business Combination and (v) with respect to 20% of such shares, when the closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $17.00 for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period following the consummation of a Business Combination or earlier, in any case, if, following a Business Combination, the Company engages in a subsequent transaction (1) resulting in the Company’s shareholders having the right to exchange their shares for cash or other securities or (2) involving a consolidation, merger or other change in the majority of the Company’s board of directors or management team in which the Company is the surviving entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with an initial Business Combination, the Initial Stockholders may transfer, assign or sell their Founder Shares with the Company’s consent to any person or entity that agrees in writing to be bound by the transfer restrictions set forth in the prior sentence.

F-12
liabilities (in thousands):

FINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 AND

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MAY 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015

Promissory Note — Related Party

Prior to the closing of the Initial Public Offering, the Company’s Sponsor loaned the Company $231,846 for expenses related to the Company’s formation and the Initial Public Offering. The loan was non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on the earlier of June 30, 2017 or the closing of the Initial Public Offering. The loan was repaid upon the closing of the Initial Public Offering on January 25, 2017.

Related Party Loans

In order to finance transaction costs in connection with a Business Combination, the Sponsor has committed to loan the Company funds as may be required up to a maximum of $1,100,000 (“Working Capital Loans”), which will be repaid upon the consummation of a Business Combination. However, if the Company does not consummate a Business Combination, the Company may use funds held outside the Trust Account to repay the Working Capital Loans; however, no proceeds from the Trust Account may be used for such repayment, other than interest income earned thereon in an amount, when taken together with amounts released to the Company for working capital purposes, that does not exceed $500,000. If such funds are insufficient to repay the Working Capital Loans, the unpaid amounts would be forgiven. Any part or all of the Working Capital Loans may be converted into additional warrants at $0.75 per one-half of one warrant (warrants to purchase a maximum of 733,333 whole shares if the full $1,100,000 is loaned and that amount is converted into warrants) of the post-Business Combination entity at the option of the Sponsor. The warrants would be identical to the Placement Warrants. There were no Working Capital Loans outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Registration Rights

 Pursuant to a registration rights agreement entered into on January 19, 2017, the holders of the Founder Shares, Placement Units (including any securities contained therein) and the warrants that may be issued upon conversion of the Working Capital Loans (and any shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Placement Warrants or the warrants issued upon conversion of the Working Capital Loans) are entitled to registration rights. The holders of these securities are entitled to make up to three demands, excluding short form demands, that the Company register such securities. In addition, the holders have certain “piggy-back” registration rights with respect to registration statements filed subsequent to the completion of a Business Combination and rights to require the Company to register for resale such securities pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act. However, the registration rights agreement provides that the Company will not permit any registration statement filed under the Securities Act to become effective until termination of the applicable lock-up period. The Company will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.

Underwriting Agreement

The Company granted the underwriters a 45-day option to purchase up to 2,295,000 additional Units to cover over-allotments, if any, at the Initial Public Offering price, less the underwriting discounts and commissions. On January 25, 2017, the underwriters exercised their over-allotment option to purchase 2,200,000 Units at a purchase price of $10.00 per Unit and waived the remaining portion of the over-allotment option to purchase up to 95,000 Units.

The underwriters were paid a cash underwriting discount of two percent (2.0%) of the gross proceeds of the Initial Public Offering, or $3,060,000. In addition, the underwriters are entitled to a deferred fee of (i) five percent (5.0%) of the gross proceeds of the Initial Public Offering, excluding any amounts raised pursuant to the overallotment option, and (ii) seven percent (7.0%) of the gross proceeds of the Units sold in the Initial Public Offering pursuant to the overallotment option, or an aggregate of $9,190,000. The deferred fee will be paid in cash upon the closing of a Business Combination from the amounts held in the Trust Account, subject to the terms of the underwriting agreement.

Deferred Legal Fees

The Company is obligated to pay its attorneys a deferred legal fee of $25,000 upon consummation of a Business Combination or dissolution of the Company if a Business Combination is not completed within the Combination Period. Accordingly, the Company has recorded $25,000 as deferred legal fees payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017.

F-13

December 31,
20202019
Deferred tax assets:
U.S. federal and state net operating losses$5,529 $6,385 
Foreign net operating losses165 73 
Allowance for credit losses483 275 
Share-based compensation1,468 897 
Accrued compensation487 279 
Deferred revenue725 653 
Accrued TCPA claim880 
Total deferred tax assets8,857 9,442 
Deferred tax liabilities
Depreciation(2,460)(1,918)
Intangible amortization(6,924)(6,710)
Total deferred tax liabilities(9,384)(8,628)
Valuation allowance(165)(73)
Net deferred tax (liability) asset$(692)$741 

FINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 AND

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MAY 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015

7. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred Stock — The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share with such designation, rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Company’s Board of Directors.


At December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding.

Common Stock — The Company is authorized to issue 35,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share. Holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to one vote for each common share. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were 7,780,627 and 5,298,333 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively (excluding 16,112,706 and -0- shares of common stock subject to possible redemption).

Warrants— Public Warrants may only be exercised for a whole number of shares. No fractional shares will be issued upon exercise of the Public Warrants. The Public Warrants will become exercisable on the later of (a) 30 days after the completion of a Business Combination or (b) 12 months from the closing of the Initial Public Offering; provided in each case that2020, the Company has an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Public Warrants and a current prospectus relating to them is available. The Company has agreed that as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 20 business days after the closing of a Business Combination, the Company will use its best efforts to file with the SEC a registration statement for the registration, under the Securities Act, of the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Public Warrants. The Company will use its best efforts to cause the same to become effective and to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement, and a current prospectus relating thereto, until the expiration of the Public Warrants in accordance with the provisions of the warrant agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Company’s common stock is at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that it satisfies the definition of a “covered security” under the Securities Act, the Company, at its option, may require holders of Public Warrants who exercise their warrants to do so on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event the Company so elects, the Company will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement. The Public Warrants will expire five years after the completion of a Business Combination or earlier upon redemption or liquidation.

The Private Warrants are identical to the Public Warrants underlying the Units sold in the Initial Public Offering, except that the Private Warrants and the common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Private Warrants will not be transferable, assignable or salable until 30 days after the completion of a Business Combination, subject to certain limited exceptions.

Additionally, the Placement Warrants will be non-redeemable so long as they are held by the Sponsor, Cantor or their permitted transferees. If the Placement Warrants are held by someone other than the Sponsor, Cantor or their permitted transferees, the Placement Warrants will be redeemable by the Company and exercisable by such holders on the same basis as the Public Warrants. In addition, for as long as the Placement Warrants are held by Cantor or its designees or affiliates, they may not be exercised after five years from the effective date of the registration statement for the Initial Public Offering

The Company may redeem the Public Warrants (except as described above with respect to the Placement Warrants):

in whole and not in part;
at a price of $0.01 per warrant;
upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption;
if, and only if, the last sale price of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $24.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the Company sends the notice of redemption to the warrant holders; and
if, and only if, there is a current registration statement in effect with respect to the shares of common stock underlying such warrants at the time of redemption and for the entire 30-day trading period referred to above and continuing each day thereafter until the date of redemption.

If the Company calls the Public Warrants for redemption, management will have the option to require all holders that wish to exercise the Public Warrants to do so on a “cashless basis,” as described in the warrant agreement.

The exercise price and number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants may be adjusted in certain circumstances including in the event of a stock dividend, or recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation. However, the warrants will not be adjusted for issuance of common stock at a price below its exercise price. Additionally, in no event will the Company be required to net cash settle the warrants. If the Company is unable to complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period and the Company liquidates the funds held in the Trust Account, holders of warrants will not receive any of such funds with respect to their warrants, nor will they receive any distribution from the Company’s assets held outside of the Trust Account with the respect to such warrants. Accordingly, the warrants may expire worthless.

F-14

FINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 AND

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MAY 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015

8. INCOME TAX

Information for the year ended December 31, 2016 and for the period from May 28, 2015 (inception) through December 31, 2015 is not presented as it is deemed to be not material.

The Company’s net deferred tax assets are as follows:

  December 31,
2017
 
Deferred tax asset   
Organizational costs/Startup expenses $216,951 
Total deferred tax assets  216,951 
Valuation allowance  (216,951)
Deferred tax asset, net of allowance $ 

The income tax provision consists of the following:

  Year Ended
December 31,
2017
 
Federal   
Current $436,721 
Deferred  (216,951)
     
State    
Current $ 
Deferred   
Change in valuation allowance  216,951 
Income tax provision $436,721 

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had no U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryovers (“NOLs”)carryforwards of approximately $22.7 million and $19.8 million, respectively, which are available to offsetreduce future taxable income. In accordance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, deductibilityWith few exceptions, these net operating loss carryforwards will expire from 2029 through 2037. Utilization of the Company’s NOLs may benet operating loss carryforwards is now subject to an annual limitation inunder Internal Revenue Code Section 382. The Company has recorded a deferred tax asset for only the eventportion of its net operating loss carryforward that it expects to realize before expiration.

With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state or local income tax examinations by tax authorities for the years prior to 2016. However, the Company has certain net operating loss carryforwards from tax years 2009 through 2017 that are subject to examination. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company did 0t have any amounts accrued for interest and penalties or recorded for uncertain tax positions.
In 2018, FinTech Acquisition Corp II was notified by the IRS that its 2017 federal income tax return was selected for examination. In 2019, the exam was closed with no adjustments to the reported tax. In January 2020, Intermex Holdings II, Inc., the Company’s parent company prior to the Merger, was notified by the IRS that its 2017 federal income tax return was selected for examination. In August 2020, the examination was closed with no changes to the reported tax. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, 0 amounts for tax, interest, or penalties have been paid or accrued as a change in control as definedresult of this examination.
In accordance with criteria under FASB guidance, Income Taxes, a valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the regulations.

In assessing the realizationcarrying amounts of the deferred tax assets management considers whetherunless it is more likely than not that some portion of all of the deferred taxsuch assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences representing net future deductible amounts become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. After consideration of all evidence, both positive and negative, management has determined that 0 valuation allowance is required at December 31, 2020 or 2019 on the Company’s U.S. deferred tax assets. However, a valuation allowance of the information available, management believes that significant uncertainty exists with respect to future realization$165.0 thousand and $73.3 thousand as of theDecember 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, has been recorded on deferred tax assets associated with Canadian net operating loss carryforwards.

On March 27, 2020, the United States enacted the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and has therefore establishedEconomic Security (“CARES”) Act. The Cares Act is an emergency economic stimulus package that includes spending and tax breaks to strengthen the United States economy and fund a full valuation allowance. Fornationwide effort to curtail the effects of COVID-19. The CARES Act provides various tax law changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including increasing the ability to deduct interest expense, providing for deferral on tax deposits, and amending certain provisions of the previously enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. After considering the provisions of the CARES Act, the Company determined that the CARES Act did not have a material effect on its annual effective tax rate and the income tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2017, the change2020.
F-24

NOTE 17 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases
The Company is a party to leases for office space, warehouses and Company-operated store locations. Rent expense under all operating leases, included in other selling, general and administrative expenses in the valuation allowance was $216,951.

A reconciliationconsolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), amounted to approximately $2.2 million, $2.1 million and $1.8 million for the federal income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate atyears ended December 31, 2017 is2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

In April 2018, the Company renegotiated its corporate lease to extend the term through November 2025. At December 31, 2020, future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

Year Ended
December 31,
2017
Statutory federal income tax rate34.0%
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit0.0%
Deferred tax rate change53.4%
Change in valuation allowance86.3%
Income tax provision173.7%

follows (in thousands):

2021$1,476 
20221,182 
2023895 
2024776 
2025662 
Thereafter
$4,991 
Contingencies and Legal Proceedings
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in various state and local jurisdictions and is subject to examination bylegal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the various taxing authorities. The Company considers Pennsylvaniaordinary course of its business and have not been finally adjudicated. Although there can be no assurance as to be a significant state tax jurisdiction.  

F-15

FINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 AND

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MAY 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015

9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS 

The Company classifies its U.S. Treasurythe ultimate disposition of these matters, it is the opinion of the Company’s management, based upon the information available at this time and equivalent securities as held-to-maturity in accordance with ASC 320 “Investments - Debtthe stage of the proceedings, that it is not possible to determine the probability of loss or estimate of damages, and Equity Securities.” Held-to-maturity securities are those securities whichtherefore, the Company has the ability and intent to hold until maturity. Held-to-maturity treasury securities are recorded at amortized cost on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and adjustednot established a reserve for any of these proceedings, except for the amortization or accretionmatter related to a complaint filed under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of premiums or discounts.

Cash held1991 (the “TCPA claim”) described below.

On May 30, 2019, Stuart Sawyer filed a putative class action complaint in the Trust Account amounted to $6,050 and $0 at December 31, 2017 and 2016.

The gross holding gains and fair valueUnited States District Court for the Southern District of held-to-maturity securities at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

   Held-To-Maturity Amortized Cost  Gross
Holding
Losses
  Fair Value 
December 31, 2017  U.S. Treasury Securities (Mature on 1/18/2018) $175,877,136  $(80,806) $175,796,330 
                
December 31, 2016    $  $  $ 

The Company followsFlorida asserting a claim under the guidance in ASC 820 for its financial assets and liabilitiesTCPA, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq., based on allegations that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period, and non-financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at least annually. 

The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities reflects management’s estimate of amounts thatsince May 30, 2015, the Company would havehad sent text messages to class members’ wireless telephones without their consent. The litigation was settled under a definitive Settlement Agreement on March 16, 2020, subsequently approved by the Court. The Settlement Agreement provides for resolution of Mr. Sawyer’s TCPA claims and the claims of a class of similarly situated individuals, as defined in the complaint, who received in connection with the sale of the assets or paid in connection with the transfer of the liabilities in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In connection with measuring the fair value of its assets and liabilities,text messages from the Company seeks to maximizeduring the useperiod May 30, 2015 through October 7, 2019, and for the creation of observable inputs (market data obtained from independent sources) and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs (internal assumptions about how market participants would price assets and liabilities). The following fair value hierarchy isa $3.25 million settlement fund that will be used to classify assetspay all class member claims, class counsel’s fees and liabilities based on the observable inputs and unobservable inputs used in order to valuecosts of administering the assets and liabilities:

Level 1:Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for an asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2:Observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs. Examples of Level 2 inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities and quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
Level 3:Unobservable inputs based on our assessment of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

settlement.

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs the Company utilized to determine such fair value:

Description Level  December 31,
2017
  

December 31,

2016

 
Assets:            
Cash and marketable securities held in Trust Account  1  $175,883,186  $ 

F-16

FINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 AND

FOR THE PERIOD FROM MAY 28, 2015 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015

10. MERGER AGREEMENT

On December 19, 2017, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and among the Company, Merger Sub 1, Merger Sub 2 (together with Merger Sub 1, the “Merger Subs”), Intermex and SPC Intermex Representative LLC (the “Representative”), which provides for the acquisition of Intermex by the Company pursuant to the proposed merger of Merger Sub 1 with and into Intermex with Intermex continuing as the initial surviving entity (the “First Merger”), immediately following which the initial surviving entitysettlement fund will be merged (the “Second Merger,” and together with the First Merger, the “Merger”) with and into Merger Sub 2, with Merger Sub 2 continuing as the surviving entity andmanaged by a direct wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

As a result of the Merger, each outstanding share of Intermex common stock (“Intermex Common Stock”) will convert into the right to receive a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock, as calculated pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the aggregate consideration to be paid by the Company in the Merger will consist of (i) $92,000,000 in cash ($2,000,000 ofduly-appointed settlement administrator which will be placed in escrow at closing as security for working capital adjustments), (ii) approximately $161,000,000 in shares ofauthorized to, among other things, make payments from the Company’s common stock, subject to adjustmentfund in accordance with the terms of the MergerSettlement Agreement and (iii) anthe final judgment in the case. No amount (as determined in accordance with the Merger Agreement) equal to any excess cash at Intermex at the time of the closing insettlement fund will revert to the form of cash or additional shares of the Company’s common stock, at the option of the Company, subject to certain limited exceptions. The cash considerationCompany; instead, any unclaimed funds will be funded from the cash held in the Company’s Trust Account after permitted redemptions.

Each of Intermex, the Company and the Merger Subs have made representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement that are customary for transactions of this nature. The representations and warranties of the Company, the Merger Subs and Intermex will not survive the closing of the Merger.

Consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement is subjectsent to customary conditions of the respective parties, including, among others, that (i) the Merger bea consumer advocacy organization approved by the Company’s stockholdersCourt.

The settlement fund and Intermex’s stockholder; (ii) there has been no material adverse effect with respect to Intermex or the Company since the date of the Merger Agreement; (iii) the organizational documents of the Company will be amendedrelated legal expenses were paid in full in October 2020, and restated as describedtherefore, 0 remaining balance is included in the Merger Agreement; (iv ) the parties will have received certain governmental consentsaccrued and authorizations to the Merger; (v) all applicable waiting periods and any extensions thereof under applicable antitrust, competition or similar laws will have expired or been terminated; and (vi) the Company will have at least $125,000,000other liabilities in its Trust Account as of the closing, after giving effect to the redemption of public shares by the Company’s public stockholders and the payment of deferred underwriting fees.

The Merger Agreement provides that, upon consummation of the Merger, the Company will enter into a registration rights agreement and a shareholders agreement.

Concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement, the Company, Intermex and certain existing Company stockholders entered into a Voting Agreement (the “Voting Agreement”). Pursuant to the Voting Agreement, the stockholders party thereto have agreed to, among other things, vote all of the shares of the Company’s common stock held by such stockholders (i) in favor of the adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; (ii) against any actions that would result in a breach by the Company of any obligations contained in the Merger Agreement; (iii) in favor of the proposals set forth in the Company’s preliminary proxy statement/prospectus (and definitive proxy statement/prospectus, when available) to be filed with the SEC relating to the Merger; and (iv) against alternative proposals or transactions to the Merger.

The Voting Agreement generally prohibits the stockholders party thereto from transferring, or permitting to exist any liens on, their shares of the Company’s common stock prior to the consummation of the Merger. The Voting Agreement will automatically terminate upon the first to occur of (i) the closing of the Merger and (ii) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms.

11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company evaluates subsequent events and transactions that occur after the consolidated balance sheet date upas of December 31, 2020. The settlement amount and related legal fees amounted to $3.8 million out of which approximately $0.1 million and $3.7 million were incurred during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and are included in other selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

The Company operates in 50 U.S. states, 2 U.S. territories and 3 other countries. Money transmitters and their agents are under regulation by state and federal laws. Violations may result in civil or criminal penalties or a prohibition from providing money transfer services in a particular jurisdiction. It is the opinion of the Company’s management, based on information available at this time, that the expected outcome of regulatory examinations will not have a material adverse effect on either the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
Regulatory Requirements
Certain domestic subsidiaries of the Company are subject to maintaining minimum tangible net worth and liquid assets (eligible securities) to cover the amount outstanding of wire transfers and money orders payable. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company’s subsidiaries were in compliance with these two requirements.
F-25

NOTE 18 – DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN
The Company has a defined contribution plan available to most of its employees, where the Company makes contributions to the dateplan based on employee contributions. Total employer contribution expense included in salaries and benefits in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) was approximately $127.4 thousand, $132.0 thousand and $115.2 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
F-26


INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.

SCHEDULE I – CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE REGISTRANT

As of December 31, 2020, International Money Express, Inc. is no longer considered a Smaller Reporting Company under Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. As a result and commencing with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, the Company is required to present Schedule I – Condensed Financial Information of the Registrant.

The following includes the Condensed Balance Sheets for the parent company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and Condensed Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

F-27

INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
(in thousands, except for share data)

December 31,
20202019
ASSETS
Investment in subsidiary$94,211 $55,948 
Deferred tax asset50 19 
Total assets$94,261 $55,967 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock $0.0001 par value; 230,000,000 shares authorized, 38,217,125 and 38,034,389 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively$$
Additional paid-in capital59,310 54,694 
Retained earnings34,960 1,176 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income(13)93 
Total stockholders’ equity$94,261 $55,967 



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

F-28

INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
(in thousands)

Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Income:
Equity in earnings (loss) from consolidated subsidiary, net of tax$34,091 $19,725 $(7,180)
Total income (loss)34,091 19,725 (7,180)
Expenses:
Shared-based compensation404 192 88 
Total expenses404 192 88 
Income (loss) before income taxes33,687 19,533 (7,268)
Income tax benefit(97)(76)(24)
Net income (loss)33,784 19,609 (7,244)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(106)95 
Comprehensive income (loss)$33,678 $19,704 $(7,244)



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

F-29

INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(PARENT COMPANY ONLY)
(in thousands)

Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities$97 $76 $24 
Cash flows from financing activities:
Intercompany transactions, net(1,598)9,672 (24)
Cash paid in warrant exchange(10,031)
Proceeds from exercise of options1,501 283 
Net cash used in financing activities(97)(76)(24)
Net change in cash
Cash, beginning of the year
Cash, end of the year$$$



See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

F-30

INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS, INC.
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE REGISTRANT
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

International Money Express, Inc. (the “Parent”) is a holding company that conducts substantially all of its business operations through its subsidiaries. The parent company financial information has been derived from its consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements were issued. Other than as described below,and notes of International Money Express, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

NOTE 2 – INCOME TAXES

The Parent files a consolidated United States federal income tax return and also a number of consolidated state income tax returns on behalf of its direct and indirect subsidiaries. In these circumstances, the Company did not identify any subsequent events that would have required adjustment or disclosure inParent may be responsible for remitting income tax payments on behalf of the consolidated financial statements. 

In January 2018, the Company withdrew $562,554 from interest earned on the Trust Account to pay franchise andgroup. The Parent’s provision for income taxes payable.

F-17
has been computed as if it were a separate tax-paying entity. The Parent has not recorded deferred tax assets or liabilities associated with outside basis differences in its investment in subsidiary.

F-31

Item 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures are controls(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and other procedures15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submittedpursuant to the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules, regulations and related forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and President, and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within an organization have been detected. Accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of our disclosure control system are met.
As required by Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act, our Chief Executive Officer and President, and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of 1934,the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as amended (the “Exchange Act”)of December 31, 2020. Based on their evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective and operating to provide reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensureforms, including ensuring that such material information required to be disclosed in company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and President, and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Asdisclosure as of December 31, 2017, as required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective. 

2020.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rulesthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(f). Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of anyPresident, and our Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, management usedbased on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework(2013 Framework) (the “COSO Framework”). Based on this assessment,evaluation under the COSO Framework, our management believesconcluded that as of December 31, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.

was effective as of December 31, 2020.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of ourthe Company’s registered independent registered public accounting firm because as an "emergingon management’s assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting due to the exemption from such requirements established by rules of the SEC for emerging growth company" under the JOBS Act our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to issue such an attestation report.

companies.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During

Notwithstanding operational changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, during the most recently completed fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.

46

ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION
None.
61

PART III

Item 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Directors and Executive Officers

Our directors and executive officers are as follows:

NameAgeTitle
Betsy Z. Cohen*76Chairman of the
ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board
Daniel G. Cohen*48Chief Executive Officer and Director
James J. McEntee, III60President and Chief Financial Officer
Walter Beach51Director
Jeremy Kuiper55Director
Shami Patel49Director

* Mr. Cohen is the son of Mrs. Cohen.

Betsy Z. Cohen has served as Chairman of ourDirectors

Our board of directors since August 2016(“Board of Directors” or “Board”) is presently fixed at eight directors in accordance with the bylaws of International Money Express, Inc. (the “Company”). The Board of Directors is divided into three classes designated as Class I, Class II and Class III. One class of directors is a memberelected at each annual meeting of our sponsor. Shestockholders for a term of three years. Each director holds office until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, or the director’s earlier resignation, death or removal. The term of the Board’s Class III directors expires at the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, the term of the Board’s Class I directors expires at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders and the term of the Class II directors expires at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.

Set forth below are the name and age of each of the directors of the Company, positions with the Company, term of office as a director of the Company, business experience during the past five years or more, and additional biographical data as of March 1, 2021.
NameAgePositionDirector SinceDirector Class
Robert Lisy63Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors2018III
Adam Godfrey58Director2018III
Kurt Holstein60Director2018II
Christopher Lofgren62Director2019I
Laura Maydón47Director2020I
Michael Purcell63Lead Independent Director2018III
John Rincon55Director2018II
Justin Wender51Director2018I

Robert Lisy has served as a director of FinTech IInternational Money Express, Inc. since November 2013 and its successor, Card Connect Corp (Nasdaq: CCN), a provider of payment processing solutions to merchants, and previously served as Chairman of the board of directors of FinTech I from July 2014 through July 2016 and as FinTech I’s Chief Executive Officer from July 2014 through August 2014. She served as Chief Executive Officer of Bancorp and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Bancorp Bank, since September 2000 and Chairman of Bancorp Bank since November 2003, and resigned from these positions upon her retirement in December 2014. She served as the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and as a trustee of RAIT Financial Trust (NYSE: RAS), a real estate investment trust, since its founding in August 1997, through her resignation as of December 31, 2010 and served as RAIT’s Chief Executive Officer from 1997 to 2006. Mrs. Cohen2018. Mr. Lisy served as a director of Hudson United Bancorp (a bank holding company),International Money Express Sub 2, LLC’s predecessor entities from 2009 to 2018. Mr. Lisy is the successor to JeffBanks, Inc., from December 1999 until July 2000 and as the Chairman of the Jefferson Bank Division of Hudson United Bank (Hudson United Bancorp’s banking subsidiary) from December 1999 through March 2000. Before the merger of JeffBanks, Inc. with Hudson United Bancorp in December 1999, Mrs. Cohen was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, of JeffBanks, Inc. from its inception in 1981 and also served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of each of its subsidiaries, Jefferson Bank, which she founded in 1974, and Jefferson Bank New Jersey, which she founded in 1987. From 1985 until 1993, Mrs. Cohen was a director of First Union Corp. of Virginia (a bank holding company) and its predecessor, Dominion Bancshares, Inc. In 1969, Mrs. Cohen co-founded a commercial law firm and served as a senior partner until 1984. Mrs. Cohen is also a director of Aetna, Inc. (NYSE: AET), an insurance company. Our board has determined that Mrs. Cohen’s extensive experience in the financial services industry generally, and the financial technology industry in particular, as well as extensive experience in operating financial services companies in a public company environment, qualifies her to serve as a member of our board of directors.

47

Daniel G. Cohen has served as a director and our Chief Executive Officer since May 2015 and is the managing member of our sponsor. He previously served as a director of FinTech I from November 2013 until July 2016, as FinTech I’s President, and Chief Executive Officer from August 2014 until July 2016, and as FinTech I’s Executive Vice President from July 2014 through August 2014. He has been the Chairman of Bancorp and Chairman of the Executive Committee of Bancorp’s Board of Directors since its inception in 1999. Mr. Cohen is Vice-Chairman of the Bank’s Board of Directors and Chairman of its Executive Committee. He had previously been Chairman of the Bank’s Board of Directors from September 2000 to November 2003 and, from July 2000 to September 2000, had been the Bank’s Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Cohen has served as the President of Cohen & Company Financial Limited (formerly Euro DeKania Management Ltd.), a wholly owned subsidiary of IFMI (NYSE: IFMI), formerly Cohen & Company Inc., and Alesco Financial, Inc. (which merged into IFMI), investment firms specializing in credit-related fixed income investments, since September 2013. Mr. Cohen has also served since September 2013, as President and Chief Executive Officer of all businesses of IFMI, LLC arising out of or related to Europe. Mr. Cohen served as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of IFMI from December 2009 through September 2013, as their respective Chairman of the Board of Directors since October 2006 and as Executive Chairman from October 2006 through December 2009. He is also Chairman of JVB Financial, a broker dealer subsidiary of IFMI. In addition, before its merger with Alesco Financial, Mr. Cohen served as the Chairman of the Board of Managers of Cohen Brothers LLC, an investment firm specializing in credit related fixed income investment, from 2001, as Chief Investment Officer from October 2008 and as Chief Executive Officer from December 2009. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of RAIT from December 2006, when it merged with Taberna Realty Finance Trust, to February 2009, and served as a trustee from the date RAIT acquired Taberna until his resignation from that position in February 2010. Mr. Cohen was Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Taberna Realty Finance Trust from its inception in March 2005 until its December 2006 acquisition by RAIT,International Money Express, Inc. and its Chief Executive Officer from March 2005 to December 2006.predecessors, which he joined in 2009. Mr. Cohen served as a directorLisy has 30 years of Star Asia, a joint venture investing in Asian commercial real estate, from February 2007 to February 2014 and as a director of Muni Funding Company of America, LLC, a company investing in middle-market non-profit organizations, from April 2007 to June 2011. Our board has determined that Mr. Cohen’s service as a director and as an executive officer of various entities in the banking industry have provided him with industry specific expertise that qualifies him to serve as a member of our board of directors.

James J. McEntee, III has served as our President and Chief Financial Officer since May 2015 and is the grantor of a trust (for whom an unrelated person is trustee) for the benefit of his children which is a member of our sponsor. He served as FinTech I’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer from August 2014 to July 2016. He has served as the Managing Principal of StBWell, LLC, an owner and operator of real estate, since June 2010. Mr. McEntee has been a director of both Bancorp and its wholly-owned subsidiary Bancorp Bank since September 2000 and a director of T-Rex Group, Inc., a provider of risk analytics software for investors in renewable energy, since November 2014. Mr. McEntee was the Chief Executive Officer of Alesco Financial, Inc. from the date of its incorporation in 2006 until its merger with Cohen & Company in December 2009 and was the Chief Operating Officer of Cohen & Company from March 2003 until December 2009, and was a managing director of IFMI (a successor company to Cohen & Company) and was the Vice-Chairman and Co-Chief Operating Officer of JVB Financial through October 2013. Mr. McEntee was a principal in Harron Capital, L.P., a media and communications venture capital fund, from 1999 to September 2002. From 1990 through 1999, Mr. McEntee was a stockholder at Lamb McErlane, PC, and from 2000 until 2004 was of counsel to Lamb McErlane. Mr. McEntee was previously a director of Pegasus Communications Corporation, a publicly held provider of communications and other services, and of several other private companies. Mr. McEntee has served since 2008 as a director of The Chester Fund, a nonprofit organization, and has served as its Chairman since July 2012.

Independent Directors

Walter T. Beach has served as a director since August 2016. He previously served as a director of FinTech I from November 2014 until July 2016. He has been a director of both Bancorp and Bancorp Bank since 1999. Mr. Beach has been a Managing Director of Beach Investment Counsel, Inc., an investment management firm, since 1997. From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Beach was a Senior Analyst and Director of Research at Widmann, Siff and Co., Inc., an investment management firm, where he was, beginning in 1994, responsible for the firm’s investment decisions for its principal equity product. As research director, he was one of two major contributors to overall investment management. From 1992 to 1993, he was an associate and financial analyst at Essex Financial Group, a consulting and merchant banking firm. From 1991 to 1992 he was an analyst at Industry Analysis Group, an industry and economic consulting firm. Mr. Beach has served as a director of Resource Capital Corp. (NYSE:RSO), a real estate investment trust, since 2005. Mr. Beach served as a director of Institutional Financial Markets, Inc. from December 2009 to September 2013. Our board has determined that Mr. Beach’s extensive experience in the retail financial services and electronic payment processing industry and as a member of the boards ofin various public companies qualifies him to serve as a member of our board of directors.

48

Jeremy Kuiper has served as a director since August 2016 and has served as Managing Director of the Payment Solutions division of Bancorp since 2007. In January 2016 he assumed responsibility for all payments business units within Bancorp,positions, including the Payment Acceptance Group and ACH Services. Previously, he served as Director of Financial Management, Operations and Credit Risk Management at BankFirst and served in other positions at that company between 2000 and 2007. From 1997 through 2007, he served as Senior Vice President of United Credit National Bank where he oversaw card products. From 1994 through 2007, he served as Senior Vice President of Specialized Card Services, where he was responsible for all information services, customer service and other aspects of card management. Mr. Kuiper is an in-demand industry panelist/speaker and participates on many boards, including the Network Branded Prepaid Card Association, of which he is a former Chairman. Our board has determined that Mr. Kuiper’s extensive experience financial technology industry qualifies him to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Shami Patel has served as a director since August 2016 and previously served as a director of FinTech I from November 2014 until July 2016. He has servedthree years as the Co-HeadChief Marketing and Sales Officer of the Venture Capital Team and General Partner of Pacific View Ventures, a division of Pacific View Asset Management, LLC, an investment advisory firm, since July 2014 and as the Vice Chairman of the Board of Golden Pacific Bancorp, Inc.Vigo Remittance Corp., a financial holding company that provides bankingmoney transfer and other financial productsbill payments service in the United States and services, from October 2010 through January 1, 2015. He has servedinternationally, and over seven years at Clean Pacific Ventures Management, LLC, a venture capital firm specializingWestern Union in early stage investments, as a venture partner since February 2013. From September 2009 to November 2011,various sales, marketing and operational positions of increasing responsibility. Mr. PatelLisy was a founding partner at, and served on the Executive Committee of Hexagon Securities, LLC, a credit focused investment bank and securities firm. From 2001Direct Express/Paystation America, which offered, among other things, prepaid debit cards to August 2009, he served as Managing Director and Senior Partner at Cohen & Company, where he helped launch Alesco Financial, Inc.,federal benefit recipients, where he served as Chief Operating Officer and on the board of directors. He was an integral part in the efforts to successfully sell Direct Express in 2000 to American Payment Systems. Mr. Lisy holds a bachelor’s degree in Finance from Cleveland State University. We believe that Mr. Lisy’s experience as the Chairman and Chief InvestmentExecutive Officer of Intermex coupled with his extensive operational experience in the retail financial services and remittance industries make him well qualified to serve as a director.


Adam Godfrey has served as a director of International Money Express, Inc. since 2018. Mr. Godfrey served as a director of the Company’s predecessor entity from 2006 to 2009. From 19992017. Mr. Godfrey is a Managing Partner of Stella Point Capital, which he co-founded in 2012. Stella Point Capital is a New York-based private equity firm focused on industrial, consumer and business services investments. Mr. Godfrey is an investment professional and has sourced and managed numerous investments for Stella Point Capital. Previously, Mr. Godfrey spent nearly 19 years with Lindsay Goldberg and its predecessor entities, which he joined in 1992. Mr. Godfrey was a Partner at the firm and served on the board of directors of 12 portfolio companies during his time with Lindsay Goldberg. Currently, he serves on the board of directors of First American Payment Systems Holdings, Inc., SPC Velir, LP, Vereco Holdings, LLC, American Orthodontics Corporation, and publicly traded Schneider National, Inc. (NYSE: SNDR), on which he currently also serves as Chairman of the board of directors and a member of the corporate governance committee. Mr. Godfrey holds a bachelor’s degree from Brown University and a master’s degree in business administration from the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth. We believe that Mr. Godfrey’s extensive investment management and transactional experience coupled with his experience serving as the chairman of a publicly traded company and on the boards of directors of other companies make him well qualified to 2000,serve as a director.

Kurt Holstein joined the Board of Directors in 2018 upon completion of the merger among the Company, FinTech Acquisition Corp. II and certain other parties to the transaction (the “Merger”). Mr. Holstein is President of Azoic Ventures, Inc., an investment vehicle and advisory firm which he founded in 2011. Mr. Holstein co-founded Rosetta Marketing Group, which became one of the five largest independent digital agencies in the United States prior to its sale to a public company in 2011, where he served in various roles, including Chief Operating Officer, President and Vice Chairman, and led the execution of Rosetta’s significant acquisitions, financing rounds, and the sale of the firm. Previously, Mr. Holstein spent 16 years at Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG) with positions of increasing responsibility in management systems and brand management. Mr. Holstein serves on the boards of directors of several privately held companies, including SPC Velir, LP and The Piseco Company. Mr. Holstein holds a bachelor’s degree in Engineering from Cornell University. We
62

believe that Mr. Holstein’s extensive operational and transactional experience coupled with his experience serving on boards of directors make him well qualified to serve as Chief Financial Officer for TRM Corporation (NASDAQ: TRMM), a consumer and financial services company. In 2000, he founded iATMglobal.net,director.

Christopher Lofgren has served as a middleware software business where hedirector of International Money Express, Inc. since 2019. Mr. Lofgren served as Chief Executive Officer and which was sold to NCR CorporationPresident, and as a director, of publicly traded Schneider National, Inc. (NYSE: SNDR) from August 2002 until his retirement in 2001.April 2019. He joined Schneider Logistics in 1994 as vice president of engineering and systems. He later served as ViceChief Information Officer and Chief Operating Officer before being named President and Chief Executive Officer of Schneider in 2002. Before joining Schneider, Mr. Lofgren held positions at Symantec Corporation, Motorola and CAPS Logistics. He currently serves as Chairman of the West Coast Region for Sirrom CapitalBoard of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, as a member of the board of directors of New Vista Acquisition Corporation, a mezzanine finance fund, from 1998 to 1999. Prior to this he was in the business services group at Robertson Stephens, an investment banking firm from 1997 to 1998newly formed corporation focusing on aerospace and servedaviation technologies, and as a strategy consultant inmember of the energy group at Andersen Consulting from 1991 to 1993.board of governors of the Montana State University Alumni Association. Previously, Mr. Patel hasLofgren served on the Board of the Duke University SchoolDirectors of Law since 2011 and has been a Senior Lecturing Fellow since 2012 and a member of the Advisory Board of the Law and Entrepreneurship Program at Duke since 2013. Mr. PatelCA Technologies for 13 years. He has also served on the Executive CommitteeGreen Bay, Wisconsin Senior Advisory Board for Junior Achievement, the Boys and Girls Club, and the Green Bay Symphony Orchestra. He holds a bachelor’s degree and a master’s degree in industrial and management engineering from Montana State University and a doctorate in industrial and systems engineering from The Georgia Institute of Technology. In October 2009, Mr. Lofgren was inducted into the Seven Hills School since 2010 and has been the TreasurerNational Academy of the Board of Trustees since 2012. Our board has determinedEngineering. We believe that Mr. Patel’s extensiveLofgren’s experience in the financial services industryas both a technology leader and both as an investor and operatora public company CEO coupled with his experience serving on boards of various private and public high growth companies qualifiesdirectors make him well qualified to serve as a director.

Laura Maydón has served as a director of International Money Express, Inc. since 2020. Ms. Maydón was the founding Managing Director and CEO for Endeavor Miami, an entrepreneurial accelerator for scale-ups, which she co-founded and led from September 2013 to June 2019, when she stepped away from day-to-day activities to serve for a year as a board member. She currently serves as mentor of the organization. From 2003 to 2013, Ms. Maydón held a variety of positions of increasing responsibility at Visa (NYSE: V), ultimately serving from 2010 through 2013 as Senior Business Leader, Commercial Solutions, LATAM & Caribbean after having been Business Development Leader, LATAM & Caribbean from 2004 to 2010. She currently serves on the Board of Advisors for Sustalytics and NovoPayment. She holds a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School and a B.S in Economics from Instituto Tecnologico Autonomo de México. We believe that Ms. Maydón’s years of experience at Visa and Endeavor Miami and knowledge of digital financial and payment services, make her well-qualified to serve as a director.

Michael Purcell joined the Board of Directors in 2018 upon completion of the Merger and was appointed lead independent director for the Company on September 24, 2020. Mr. Purcell is a certified public accountant and became an independent business consultant following retirement in 2015. Mr. Purcell spent more than 36 years with Deloitte, where he was an audit partner and the Philadelphia office leader of Deloitte’s middle-market and growth enterprise services. Mr. Purcell has served on the boards of directors of numerous companies and organizations, and currently serves as a director and member of our boardthe audit committee of directors.

Numberpublicly traded Tabula Rasa Healthcare, Inc. (NASDAQ: TRHC), CFG Community Bank, Hyperion Bank, McKean Defense Group and Termsseveral other for-profit and non-profit entities. He is a member of Officethe American Institute of OfficersCertified Public Accountants and Directors

Oura former President of the Philadelphia Chapter of the Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Purcell holds a bachelor’s degree from Lehigh University and a master’s degree in business administration from Drexel University. We believe that Mr. Purcell’s extensive public accounting experience coupled with his experience serving on boards of directors make him well qualified to serve as a director.


John Rincon has served as a director of International Money Express, Inc. since 2018. Mr. Rincon served as a director of the Company’s predecessor entity from 1994 to 2017. Mr. Rincon founded Intermex Wire Transfer, LLC in 1994 and served as its Chairman and President until 2006. Mr. Rincon has more than 20 years of experience in the money remittance and telecommunications industries, having held various management and supervisory positions prior to founding the Company. Mr. Rincon is the Chairman of Rincon Capital Partners, a private investment firm, which he founded in 2007. We believe that Mr. Rincon’s experience as the Company’s founder coupled with his extensive operational and transactional experience in the money remittance industry make him well qualified to serve as a director.

Justin Wender has served as a director of International Money Express, Inc. since 2018. Mr. Wender served as a director of Interwire LLC, an affiliate of Stella Point Capital, from 2017 to 2018. Mr. Wender is a Managing Partner of Stella Point Capital, which he co-founded in 2012. Stella Point Capital is a New York-based private equity firm focused on industrial, consumer and business services investments. Mr. Wender is an investment professional and has sourced and managed numerous investments for Stella Point Capital. Mr. Wender serves as trustee of the Weitz Funds. Previously, Mr. Wender spent more than 17 years at Castle Harlan, which he joined in 1993. Mr. Wender served as President of the firm from 2006 to 2010, led the effort of raising two funds, and served on the board of directors is divided into two classesof 11 portfolio companies during his time with only one classCastle Harlan. Currently, he serves on the board of directors being electedof First American Payment Systems Holdings, Inc. SPC Velir, LP, and Vereco Holdings, LLC, as well as on the boards of several educational and charitable organizations. Mr. Wender holds a bachelor’s degree from Carleton College and a master’s degree in each yearbusiness administration from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. We believe that Mr. Wender’s extensive investment management and each class (excepttransactional experience coupled with his experience serving on boards of directors make him well qualified as a director.

63

Executive Officers

Set forth below is certain information regarding the Company’s current executive officers as of December 31, 2020:
NameAgePosition
Robert Lisy63Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Andras Bende46Chief Financial Officer
Randy Nilsen58Chief Revenue Officer
Joseph Aguilar59Chief Operating Officer
Ernesto Luciano47Chief Compliance Officer and General Counsel

Robert Lisy. Biographical information for those directors appointed priorMr. Lisy is included above with the director biographies under the caption “Board of Directors.”
Andras Bende joined International Money Express, Inc. as Chief Financial Officer in December 2020. Prior to our first annual meetingjoining the Company, Mr. Bende served as the Chief Financial Officer of stockholders) servingComputer Services, Inc., a two-year term. The termfinancial technology company, from 2018 to 2019, where he helped guide the company during a period of officesignificant growth and share price appreciation. Prior to his time at Computer Services, Inc., Mr. Bende held several international Chief Financial Officer and Controller roles at GE Capital from 2012 to 2017. Mr. Bende is a graduate of GE’s Financial Management Program and the GE Corporate Audit Staff and holds a bachelor’s degree in financial management from Clemson University.
Randy Nilsen has served as the Chief Revenue Officer of International Money Express, Inc. since 2018. Mr. Nilsen was Intermex’s Chief Revenue Officer from 2015 to 2018. Prior to joining the Company , Mr. Nilsen served as Chief Revenue Officer at Sigue Money Transfer Services (“Sigue”), a global remittance provider from 2011 to 2015 where he was responsible for revenue generation through acquisition and retention of both agents and consumers within North America. Prior to his employment with Sigue, Mr. Nilsen was the Chief Franchise Sales and Operations Officer at Jackson Hewitt from 2008 to 2011. Prior to Jackson Hewitt, Mr. Nilsen was with Western Union from 1987 to 2008 where he held roles with increasing responsibility in sales, marketing and sales planning and was responsible for business units in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. Mr. Nilsen is a graduate of the first classExecutive Management program at the University of directors, consistingCalifornia Los Angeles’s Anderson School of Walter T. Beach, Jeremy Kuiper,Management and Shami Patel, will expireholds a bachelor’s degree in Business Finance from Brigham Young University.
Joseph Aguilar, joined International Money Express, Inc. in September 2019 as Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining Intermex, Mr. Aguilar was a senior executive at our first annual meeting of stockholders. The term of officeSigue Corporation; starting in 2005 as the Chief Auditor, where he established the Internal Audit function for its U.S. and Mexico Operations. Following several successful audit cycles, he was promoted to Chief Operating Officer, responsible for all operations and technology functions of the second classglobal organization. In 2014, Mr. Aguilar was promoted to President of SGS, Ltd. UK, the International Division of Sigue Corporation, with responsibility for all aspects of the business in the EU, Eastern Europe, Africa, Asia and South Asia. Prior to his roles at Sigue Corporation, Mr. Aguilar held senior roles at BBVA Bancomer, California Commerce Bank and Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank of California. Mr. Aguilar holds a bachelor’s degree in English from University of California at Santa Barbara.
Ernesto Luciano joined International Money Express, Inc. as Chief Compliance Officer and General Counsel in December 2020. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Luciano was the vice president & associate general counsel of Kaplan Higher Education, LLC (“Kaplan”) from 2016 to 2020. Prior to his role at Kaplan, Mr. Luciano was general counsel for Verizon Media’s U.S. Hispanic and Latin American division and also held senior legal positions with Home Box Office, Inc. (HBO), Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd., and Turner Broadcasting Systems (TBS), among others. Mr. Luciano holds a bachelor’s degree from the State University of New York at Albany and a Juris Doctor (J.D.) from the New England School of Law in Boston, Massachusetts.

Relationships and Arrangements
There is no family relationship between any of Company’s directors consisting of Betsy Z. Cohen and Daniel G. Cohen, will expire at the second annual meeting of stockholders.

Collectively, through their positions described above, ouror executive officers and, to the best of our knowledge, none of our directors have extensive experienceor executive officers has, during the past ten years, been involved in public companiesany legal proceedings which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and inregulations of the financial services industry. These individuals playSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). There are no arrangements between any director or executive officer of the Company and any other person pursuant to which he/she was, or will be, selected as a key role in identifying and evaluating prospective acquisition candidates, selectingdirector or executive officer, respectively, except for certain Board designation rights provided to certain shareholders under the target businesses, and structuring, negotiating and consummating their acquisition.

49
Shareholders Agreement as described below under the section captioned “Certain Related Person Transactions – Shareholders Agreement”.


64

Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements

Reports

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) requires our directors and executive officers, and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent10% of any publicly tradeda registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities ofsecurities. Specific due dates for these reports have been established, and the Company with the SEC. Officers, directors, and greater-than-ten-percent stockholders are required by the SEC's regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file.

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and Forms 4 furnished to the Company during the most recent fiscal year, and Forms 5 with respect to its most recent fiscal year, we believe that all such formsis required to be filed pursuantreport any failure to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act were timely filed by the officers, directors, and security holders required to file the samecomply therewith during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172020. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the reports filed electronically with the SEC during the registrant’s most recent fiscal year and, where applicable, written representations that no other reports were required, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with in a timely manner during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, except forthat: Joseph Aguilar filed one late Form 4 with respect to one transaction and the Hepco Family Trust, Jeremy Kuiper, Shami Patel, and the Swarthmore Trust of 2016 each filed one late Form 4 with respect to multiple transactions.


Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for our directors, officers, employees and certain affiliates in accordance with applicable federal securities laws, a copy of which is available on the Company’s website at www.intermexonline.com. If we amend or grant a waiver of one or more of the provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, we intend to satisfy the requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding the disclosure of amendments to or waivers from provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that wasapply to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer (or persons performing similar functions) by posting the required information on the Company’s website at www.intermexonline.com. The information found on the website is not reported on a timely basispart of this Form 10-K.

Director Nominations
No material changes have been made to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to our sponsor.

Board Committees

of Directors.


Audit Committee

The rulesAudit Committee of Nasdaq andthe Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) was established by the Board in accordance with Section 10A3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act, require thatto oversee the audit committeeCompany’s corporate accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of a listed company be comprised solely of independent directors. We have established an audit committee of the board of directors, whichits financial statements. Our Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Patel, Beach,Purcell, Holstein and Kuiper, all of whomRincon and Ms. Maydón, with Mr. Purcell serving as the Chairman. The Board has determined that Messrs. Purcell, Holstein and Rincon and Ms. Maydón meet the independent director standardstandards for Audit Committee members under Nasdaq’sthe Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) listing standardsrules and under Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act. Mr. Patel serves as Chairman of our audit committee.

The audit committee’s duties, which are specified in ourAs required by the Nasdaq listing rules, the Audit Committee Charter, include, but are not limited to:

reviewing and discussing with management and the independent auditor our annual audited consolidated financial statements, and recommending to the board whether the audited consolidated financial statements should be included in our Form 10-K;

discussing with management and the independent auditor significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements;

discussing with management major risk assessment and risk management policies;

monitoring the independence of the independent auditor;

verifying the rotation of the lead (or coordinating) audit partner having primary responsibility for the audit and the audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit as required by law;

reviewing and approving all related-party transactions;

inquiring and discussing with management our compliance with applicable laws and regulations;

50

pre-approving all audit services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditor, including the fees and terms of the services to be performed;

appointing or replacing the independent auditor;

determining the compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor (including resolution of disagreements between management and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work;

establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or reports which raise material issues regarding our consolidated financial statements or accounting policies; and

approving reimbursement of expenses incurred by our management team in identifying potential target businesses.

Financial Expert on Audit Committee

The audit committee will at all times be composed exclusively of independent directors who are “financially literate” as defined under Nasdaq’s listing standards. The Nasdaq listing standards define “financially literate” as being able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement.

In addition, we mustthe Company is required to certify to the NASDAQ Capital MarketNasdaq that the committeeAudit Committee has, and will continue to have, at least one member who has past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or other comparable experience or background that results in the individual’s financial sophistication. We haveThe Board has determined that Mr. PatelPurcell satisfies Nasdaq’s definition of financial sophistication and also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under rules and regulations of the SEC.

65


ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Overview

As an emerging growth company, the Company has opted to comply with the executive compensation rules applicable to “smaller reporting companies,” as such term is defined under the Securities Act, which require compensation disclosure for the Company’s “named executive officers”, as defined below.

The tabular disclosure and discussion that follow describe the Company’s executive compensation program during the most recently completed fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, with respect to the Company’s named executive officers as of December 31, 2020, including: Robert Lisy, Chief Executive Officer and President; Tony Lauro, former Chief Financial Officer; Joseph Aguilar, Chief Operating Officer; and Randall D. Nilsen, Chief Revenue Officer (collectively, the Company’s “named executive officers”).

Summary Compensation Committee

We have established a compensation committee of the board of directors, which consists of Messrs. Beach and Patel, each of whom meets the independent director standard under Nasdaq’s listing standards and under Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act. Mr. Beach serves as Chairman of our compensation committee.

51
Table

The compensation committee’s duties, which are specified in our Compensation Committee Charter, include, but are not limited to:

reviewing and approving on an annual basis the corporate goals and objectives relevant to our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, if any, evaluating our Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives and determining and approving the remuneration (if any) of our Chief Executive Officer’s based on such evaluation;
reviewing and approving the compensation, if any, of all of our other executive officers;
reviewing our executive compensation policies and plans;
implementing and administering our incentive compensation equity-based remuneration plans;
assisting management in complying with our proxy statement and annual report disclosure requirements;
approving all special perquisites, special cash payments and other special compensation and benefit arrangements for our executive officers and employees;
producing a report on executive compensation to be included in our annual proxy statement;

reviewing, evaluating and recommending changes, if appropriate, to the remuneration for directors; and

monitoring compliance with the requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 relating to loans to directors and officers, and with all other applicable laws affecting employee compensation and benefits.

The charter also provides thatfollowing table sets forth the compensation committee may,paid and earned to the named executive officers (the “NEOs”) that is attributable to services performed during fiscal years 2020 and 2019.

Name and Principal PositionYear
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Option
Awards
($)(1)
Nonequity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(2)
All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
Total
($)
Robert Lisy
Chief Executive Officer and President
2020$752,885 $— $— $463,733 $88,579 $1,305,197 
2019$725,000 $— $— $323,563 $88,437 $1,137,000 
Tony Lauro II (4)
Former Chief Financial Officer
2020$339,615 $— $— $120,817 $4,275 $464,707 
2019$330,852 $— $209,643 $115,118 $2,530 $658,143 
Joseph Aguilar
Chief Operating Officer
2020$327,115 $29,000 $713,605 $121,895 $39,000 $1,230,615 
2019$72,692 $— $570,210 $— $17,000 $659,902 
Randall D. Nilsen
Chief Revenue Officer
2020$299,269 $26,200 $— $118,078 $15,232 $458,779 
2019$280,582 $— $— $102,102 $14,148 $396,832 

(1)The amounts included in its sole discretion, retain or obtain the advice“Option Awards” column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser and will be directly responsible forstock options awarded to the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of any such adviser. However, before engaging or receiving advice from a compensation consultant, external legal counsel or any other adviser, the compensation committee will consider the independence of each such adviser, including the factors required by Nasdaq and the SEC.

Other Board Committees

Our board of directors intends to establish a nominating committee upon consummation of our initial Business Combination. At that time, our board of directors intends to adopt a charter for this committee. Prior to such time, our independent directors will address any nominations process,NEOs as required by Nasdaq.

Code of Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a code of conduct and ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employeescomputed in accordance with applicable federal securities laws,FASB ASC Topic 718. For a copydiscussion of which is attached as an exhibitthe assumptions made in the valuation reflected in these columns for fiscal year 2020, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report. We will make a printed copy of our code of conduct and ethics available to any stockholder who so requests. Requests for a printed copy may be directed to us as follows: FinTech Acquisition Corp. II, 2929 Arch Street, Suite 1703, Philadelphia, PA 19104 Attention: Secretary.

Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

None of our executive officers or directors has received any compensation (cash or non-cash) for services rendered. We will not pay compensation of any kind, including finder’s and consulting fees, to holders of founder shares, executive officers and directors, or any of their respective affiliates, for services rendered prior to or in connection with the consummation of an initial business combination other than (i) repayment of loans made to us by our sponsor to cover offering-relating and organization expenses and (ii) repayment of the up to $1,100,000 in incremental loans which our sponsor has committed to make to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended initial business combination (provided that, if we do not consummate an initial business combination, we may use working capital held outside the trust account to repay such loanedReport on Form 10-K.


(2)The amounts but no proceeds from the trust account would be used for such repayment other than up to $500,000 of interest earned thereon). However, these individuals will be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with activities on our behalf such as identifying potential target businesses and performing due diligence on suitable business combinations. Our audit committee must approve all payments in excess of $5,000 to be made to any initial holder, our sponsor, our directors and officers or our or their affiliates.

52

After the consummation of our initial Business Combination, directors or members of our management team who remain in one of those capacities may be paid director, consulting, management or other fees from the combined company with any and all amounts being fully disclosed to stockholders, to the extent then known,included in the tender offer materials or proxy solicitation materials furnished to our stockholders“Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation” column reflect the quarterly and annual performance bonuses paid and earned under the Company’s Employee Incentive Bonus Plan for fiscal years 2020 and 2019. The “Annual Cash Incentive Awards” section below describes how the Employee Incentive Bonus Plan awards were determined.


(3)For Mr. Lisy, the amounts set forth above include (x) a housing allowance in connection with a proposed business combination. It is unlikely the amount of such compensation will be known at$84.5 thousand for an apartment in the time,Miami, Florida area, for each of fiscal years 2020 and 2019 and (y) matching contributions under our 401(k) retirement savings plan, in the amount of $4.1 thousand and $3.9 thousand for fiscal years 2020 and 2019, respectively. For Mr. Lauro, the amounts set forth above include matching contributions under our 401(k) retirement savings plan, in the amount of $4.3 thousand and $2.5 thousand for fiscal years 2020 and 2019, respectively. For Mr. Aguilar, the amount set forth above includes (x) a housing allowance of $39.0 thousand and $12.0 thousand for fiscal years 2020 and 2019, respectively, and (y) a moving allowance of $5.0 thousand for fiscal year 2019 (none for 2020). For Mr. Nilsen, the amounts set forth above include (x) reimbursements for car-related costs of $13.0 thousand and $12.0 thousand for fiscal years 2020 and 2019, respectively, and (y) matching contributions under our 401(k) retirement savings plan, in the amount of $2.2 thousand and $2.1 thousand for fiscal years 2020 and 2019, respectively.

(4)Mr. Lauro resigned as it will be upthe Chief Financial Officer of the Company effective November 13, 2020.

Annual Cash Incentive Awards

We maintain the Employee Incentive Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”), an annual, cash-based, incentive plan, in which certain sales employees and all non-sales employees, including the named executive officers, participate. For 2020, payments under the Bonus Plan were determined based on completion of certain individual performance objectives, varying by employee category/position (the “Objective component”) and Company-wide Adjusted EBITDA targets (the “Adjusted EBITDA component”), as discussed below. Refer to the directors“Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section of the post-combination business to determine executive and director compensation.

Any compensation to be paid to our officers will be determined, or recommended to the board of directors for determination, either by a compensation committee constituted solely by independent directors or by a majority of the independent directors on our board of directors.

We do not intend to take any action to ensure that members of our management team maintain their positions with us after the consummation of our initial business combination, although it is possible that some or all of our executive officers and directors may negotiate employment or consulting arrangements to remain with us after the initial business combination. The existence or terms of any such employment or consulting arrangements may influence our management’s motivation in identifying or selecting a target business although we do not believe that the ability of our management to remain with us after the consummation of an initial business combination will be a determining factor in our decision to proceed with any potential business combination. We are not party to any agreements with our executive officers and directors that provide for benefits upon termination of employment.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based upon its review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be includedItem 7 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for our calculation methodology.


66

Each named executive officer’s target bonus amount was determined at the outset of the year and was expressed generally as a percentage of such officer's base salary. The target bonus percentages for 2020 were 50% for Mr. Lisy, 35% for Mr. Lauro, 32% for Mr. Aguilar and 35% for Mr. Nilsen. The CEO’s Bonus Plan was determined solely based on Adjusted EBITDA performance. The Bonus Plan for the other named executive officers was determined 75% based on Adjusted EBITDA performance and 25% based on the Objective component.

Under the terms of the Bonus Plan, the Objective component was measured and paid on a quarterly basis and may range from 0% to 150% of target. Half of the Adjusted EBITDA component is paid based on quarterly performance with the remaining half subject to full-year performance. The quarterly payout for Adjusted EBITDA is made on a binary basis, such that if the quarterly target is achieved, then the quarterly payout is made (12.5% of target), with no partial payouts. All quarterly Adjusted EBITDA targets were set at the beginning of the year.

For the full-year Adjusted EBITDA component, the Compensation Committee set threshold, target and maximum levels of performance at the outset of the year. Threshold performance was set at 90% of the targeted Adjusted EBITDA amount, achievement of which pays 0% of target. Target performance was set at 100% of the targeted Adjusted EBITDA amount, achievement of which pays 100% of target. Maximum performance was set at 115% of the targeted Adjusted EBITDA amount, the achievement of which pays 150% of target. There would be no earnout for performance below threshold and linear interpolation applies between threshold/target and target/maximum performance levels.

For 2020, the pre-established quarterly Adjusted EBITDA targets were achieved for all quarters. The full-year Adjusted EBITDA performance of $68.4 million was above the target of $63.1 million, resulting in a full-year Adjusted EBITDA earnout of 127.8% of target.

Mr. Nilsen’s individual objectives are tied to his role as Chief Revenue Officer and are specifically measured based on actual gross margin sales versus budget for each quarter. For each quarter in 2020, Mr. Nilsen achieved between 92.1% to 104.5% of the applicable gross margin sales quarterly budget.

Mr. Lauro’s individual objectives were based on the following factors: (i) product profitability analysis, (ii) enhancing liquidity management, (iii) improving investor communication and (iv) enhancing budget and financial projections in light of COVID-19 pandemic effects. For each of the first three quarters in 2020, Mr. Lauro’s level of achievement of his individual objectives ranged from 95.0% to 98.8% of the applicable goal.

Mr. Aguilar’s individual objectives are based on the following factors: (i) enhancing and consolidating the Operations functions of the Company, (ii) improving functionality of the Company’s call centers in Mexico and Guatemala, and (iii) enhancing the Information Technology, Purchasing and New Products Departments. For each quarter in 2020, Mr. Aguilar’s level of achievement of his individual objectives ranged from 70% to 100% of the applicable goal.

Based on the combined impact of Adjusted EBITDA and Objective component performance, the overall payout as a percent of target was 127.8% of target for the CEO (based on Adjusted EBITDA performance only) and ranged from 101.5% to 120.7% for Messrs. Lauro, Aguilar and Nilsen, based on quarterly and annual Adjusted EBITDA and quarterly Objective components performance.

Employment Agreements

Each of Messrs. Lisy, Aguilar and Nilsen is a party to an employment agreement with the Company, summarized below.

Chief Executive Officer and President (Robert Lisy)

On December 19, 2017, Intermex Holdings, Inc. (“Intermex”) entered into an amended and restated employment agreement (the “CEO Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Lisy for the position of Chief Executive Officer and President, which was in effect through December 30, 2020. Effective January 1, 2021, Intermex entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Lisy (the “New CEO Employment Agreement”), which expires on December 31, 2021 subject to automatic one-year extensions unless either the Company or Mr. Lisy provides at least 90 days’ written notice to the other of intent not to renew the term. The New CEO Employment Agreement replaced prior employment agreements between Mr. Lisy and the Company, including the CEO Employment Agreement in effect during 2020. During 2020, Mr. Lisy’s base salary was $725,000 and effective January 1, 2021, Mr. Lisy’s base salary is $1,000,000. The New CEO Employment Agreement also provides that Mr. Lisy is eligible to earn a performance based annual cash incentive. The amount of any annual cash incentive payable shall be determined by the Board of Directors in its discretion, and shall be conditioned on the achievement of certain performance goals, including the achievement by Intermex of budgeted Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the CEO Employment Agreement) as approved by the Board in its reasonable discretion, and the achievement of individual performance goals as may be reasonably agreed to by the Board and Mr. Lisy. The Board may, with Mr. Lisy’s consent, prospectively amend or modify from time to time the established cash incentive criteria, including any related performance requirements and target levels. Effective as of January 1, 2020, Mr. Lisy’s annual cash incentive target was increased to up to $363,000 and effective January 1, 2021, Mr. Lisy’s annual cash incentive target was increased to 100% of his base salary, or $1,000,000. The New CEO Employment Agreement, subject to approval
67

by the Compensation Committee, provides for an award to Mr. Lisy of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance stock units (“PSUs”), in each case granted under the terms of the Company’s 2020 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “2020 Plan”) and having a grant date value of $1,250,000, as computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP. On March 4, 2021, the Compensation Committee approved the awards, consisting of 88,215 shares of restricted stock (in lieu of RSUs) and 88,215 PSUs. The vesting terms and performance goals of the awards were determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant and are generally consistent with awards granted to the Company’s other employees, except that, as required by the New CEO Employment Agreement, if Mr. Lisy retires after age 66, all awards will continue to vest in accordance with their original vesting schedule, subject to attainment of any applicable performance goals.

The New CEO Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Lisy continues to be eligible to participate in all benefit programs (excluding severance, bonus, incentive or profit-sharing plans) offered by Intermex on the same basis as generally made available to other employees of Intermex and vacation and reimbursement benefits customary for a chief executive officer. In addition, Mr. Lisy is also entitled to the following benefits: (a) car allowance; (b) reimbursement for legal and certain other advisory fees incurred in connection with the negotiation of the New CEO Employment Agreement; and (c) if obtained by Intermex during the term of Mr. Lisy’s employment, the right to acquire and assume the premium payments under any life insurance policy held by Intermex upon termination of Mr. Lisy’s employment. Prior to January 1, 2021, under the CEO Employment Agreement, Mr. Lisy was also entitled to an apartment allowance in and/or around Miami, Florida and reimbursement on or before the consummation of the Merger for all legal, accounting and tax advisory services rendered to Mr. Lisy in connection with the CEO Employment Agreement, the Merger, and any other related matters and agreements. The New CEO Employment Agreement continues to subject Mr. Lisy to the following restrictive covenants: (i) non-solicitation of customers and employees of Intermex during employment and for two years thereafter; (ii) non-competition during employment and for two years thereafter; (iii) non-disclosure of confidential information for an unspecified duration; and (iv) mutual and perpetual non-disparagement. The CEO Employment Agreement also provides for severance upon a termination of employment under certain circumstances, as described below under “—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Chief Operating Officer (Joseph Aguilar)

On September 23, 2019, the Company entered into an employment agreement (the “COO Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Aguilar for the position of Chief Operating Officer for an indefinite term beginning on September 23, 2019. The COO Employment Agreement provides for a base salary of $315,000 per year, subject to increase at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The COO Employment Agreement also provides that Mr. Aguilar is eligible to participate in the Company’s annual incentive compensation plan and shall have the opportunity to earn a performance based annual cash incentive of up to $100,000. The amount of any annual cash incentive payable shall be determined by the Board of Directors in its discretion, and may be conditioned on the achievement of certain performance goals established by the Board of Directors in its discretion, including the achievement by the Company of certain Adjusted EBITDA results and the achievement by Mr. Aguilar of certain personal objectives. The Board may amend or modify from time to time the annual incentive compensation plan, including modifying the performance requirements, target levels and participation terms thereof. Mr. Aguilar is also eligible to participate in any benefit plans (excluding severance, bonus, incentive or profit-sharing plans, unless approved or determined by the Board of Directors in its discretion) offered by the Company as in effect from time to time on the same basis as generally made available to other employees of the Company. In addition, Mr. Aguilar is entitled to reimbursement and vacation benefits typical for a senior executive. The COO Employment Agreement subjects Mr. Aguilar to the following restrictive covenants: (i) non-solicitation of customers and employees of the Company during employment and for three years thereafter; (ii) non-competition during employment and for nine months thereafter; (iii) non-disclosure of confidential information for an unspecified duration; and (iv) perpetual non-disparagement. The COO Employment Agreement also provides for severance upon termination of employment under certain circumstances, as described below under “—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Chief Revenue Officer (Randy Nilsen)

On February 1, 2017, Intermex entered into an employment agreement (the “CRO Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Nilsen for the position of Chief Revenue Officer for an indefinite term beginning on February 1, 2017. The CRO Employment Agreement provides for a base salary, subject to increase at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Effective January 1, 2020, Mr. Nilsen’s base salary was $288,500. The CRO Employment Agreement also provides that Mr. Nilsen is eligible to participate in Intermex’s annual incentive compensation plan and shall have the opportunity to earn a performance based annual cash incentive of up to $100,975. The amount of any annual cash incentive payable shall be determined by the Board of Directors in its discretion, and may be conditioned on the achievement of certain performance goals established by the Board of Directors in its discretion. The Board may amend or modify from time to time the annual incentive compensation plan, including modifying the performance requirements, target levels and participation terms thereof. Mr. Nilsen is also eligible to participate in any benefit plans (excluding severance, bonus, incentive or profit-sharing plans, unless approved or determined by the Board of Directors in its discretion) offered by Intermex as in effect from time to time on the same basis as generally made available to other employees of Intermex. In addition, Mr. Nilsen is entitled to reimbursement and vacation benefits customary for a senior executive. The CRO Employment Agreement subjects Mr. Nilsen to the following restrictive covenants: (i) non-solicitation of customers and employees of Intermex during employment and for three years thereafter; (ii) non-competition during employment and for nine months thereafter; (iii) non-disclosure of confidential information for an unspecified period; and (iv) perpetual non-disparagement. The CRO Employment Agreement also provides for severance upon a termination of employment under certain circumstances, as described below under “—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”
68


Outstanding Equity Awards at End of Fiscal Year 2020

Name
Option Awards(1)
Grant DateNumber of securities underlying unexercised options
(#)
exercisable
Number of securities
underlying unexercised
options
(#)
unexercisable
Equity incentive plan
awards: Number of securities
underlying unexercised
unearned options
(#)
Option
exercise price
($)
Option expiration
date
Robert Lisy
Chief Executive Officer and President
7/26/2018594,951594,951$9.917/26/2028
Joseph Aguilar
Chief Operating Officer
9/23/201931,25093,750$14.469/23/2029
6/20/2020125,500$12.456/30/2030
Randall D. Nilsen
Chief Revenue Officer
7/26/2018115,000115,000$9.917/26/2028
Tony Lauro
Former Chief Financial Officer (2)

(1)The Option Awards column reflects stock options granted to the applicable NEO on the dates shown, which vest and become exercisable in four equal installments beginning one year after the date of grant, subject to the NEO’s continued employment with the Company. The Option Awards described in this table were granted under the Intermex 2018 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan.
(2)Mr. Lauro resigned as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company effective November 13, 2020. Mr. Lauro did not have any outstanding equity awards at the end of fiscal year 2020.

Retirement Benefit Programs

The Company maintains a tax-qualified defined contribution plan (the “401(k) Plan”) that provides retirement benefits to employees, including matching contributions. The Company matches 50% of each employee’s contributions up to a maximum of 3% of their total compensation. The NEOs are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan on the same terms as other participating employees.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

Severance under Employment Agreements

Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreements with Mr. Lisy, Mr. Aguilar and Mr. Nilsen, the NEOs are entitled to receive certain payments in connection with certain termination events.

In the event that (i) Mr. Lisy is terminated by Intermex other than for Cause, Disability (as such terms are defined in the New CEO Employment Agreement) or death, (ii) if Mr. Lisy resigns for Good Reason (as defined in the New CEO Employment Agreement) or (iii) Mr. Lisy’s employment is terminated pursuant to the Company providing notice of non-renewal of the term of the New CEO Employment Agreement, Mr. Lisy is entitled to an amount equal to two times the sum of Mr. Lisy’s base salary and Mr. Lisy’s target bonus payable in equal installments over the two year period following termination and any other Accrued Rights (as defined in the New CEO Employment Agreement). In the event Mr. Lisy’s employment is terminated by us for Cause (as defined in the New CEO Employment Agreement), Mr. Lisy would be entitled to receive any base salary through the date of termination that remains unpaid as of the date of termination, any accrued and unpaid bonus for any previously completed year that Mr. Lisy is entitled to receive as of the date of termination, and any other Accrued Rights (as defined in the New CEO Employment Agreement).

If Mr. Lisy resigns for retirement (resignation after attainment of age 66 and providing six months’ notice), then outstanding awards granted under the Intermex long term incentive program will continue to vest in accordance with their original vesting schedule, subject to attainment of any applicable performance goals.

Pursuant to the New CEO Employment Agreement, in the event that any of the payments or benefits provided by Intermex to Mr. Lisy (whether pursuant to the terms of the New CEO Employment Agreement or any equity compensation or other agreement with Intermex) would constitute “parachute payments” (“Parachute Payments”) within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, and would be subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code or any interest or penalties with respect to such excise tax (collectively, the “Excise Tax”), then such Parachute Payments to be made to Mr. Lisy shall be payable either (1) in full or (2) as to such lesser amount which would result in no portion of such Parachute Payments being subject to the Excise Tax, whichever of the foregoing amounts, taking into account
69

the applicable federal, state and local income taxes and the Excise Tax, results in Mr. Lisy’s receipt on an after-tax basis, of the greatest amount of economic benefits under the New CEO Employment Agreement, notwithstanding that all or some portion of such benefits may be subject to the Excise Tax. If a reduction in the Parachute Payment is necessary, then the reduction shall occur in accordance with the terms of the New CEO Employment Agreement.

In the event that Mr. Aguilar is terminated by Intermex other than for Cause, Disability (as defined in the COO Employment Agreement) or death or if Mr. Aguilar resigns for Good Reason (as defined in the COO Employment Agreement), he is entitled to base salary continuation for nine months, a pro-rata portion of his target bonus for the year in which termination occurs (less any bonus amounts already paid for such year) and any other Accrued Rights (as defined in the COO Employment Agreement). In the event Mr. Aguilar’s employment is terminated by the Company for Cause (as defined in the COO Employment Agreement), Mr. Aguilar would be entitled to any base salary through the date of termination that remains unpaid as of the date of termination, any accrued and unpaid bonus for any previously completed bonus period that Mr. Aguilar is entitled to receive as of the date of termination, and any other Accrued Rights (as defined in the COO Employment Agreement).

In the event that Mr. Nilsen is terminated by Intermex other than for Cause, Disability (as defined in the CRO Employment Agreement) or death or if Mr. Nilsen resigns for Good Reason (as defined in the CRO Employment Agreement), he is entitled to base salary continuation for nine months, a pro-rata portion of his target bonus for the year in which termination occurs (less any bonus amounts already paid for such year) and any other Accrued Rights (as defined in the CRO Employment Agreement). In the event Mr. Nilsen’s employment is terminated by the Company for Cause (as defined in the CRO Employment Agreement), Mr. Nilsen would be entitled to receive any base salary through the date of termination that remains unpaid as of the date of termination, any accrued and unpaid bonus for any previously completed bonus period that Mr. Nilsen is entitled to receive as of the date of termination, and any other Accrued Rights (as defined in the CRO Employment Agreement).

In addition to the rights described above upon certain terminations, termination of an NEO’s employment due to death or disability of will result in accelerated of vesting of outstanding awards under the Intermex 2018 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “2018 Plan”) and the 2020 Plan, although the number of any outstanding PSUs that vest depends on when the termination occurs during the applicable vesting period (either 100% of target or based on attainment of performance goals).

In the event of a change in control (as defined in the 2018 Plan) of Intermex, the NEO would be entitled to a full vesting of all options outstanding under the 2018 Plan. For options and other equity awards (RSUs or PSUs) granted on or after June 26, 2020, the award will be granted under the 2020 Plan. Although none of the NEOs have an award under the 2020 Plan as of December 31, 2020, awards granted under the standard form of option and RSU award agreements under the 2020 Plan provide that upon a change in control (as defined in the 2020 Plan) of Intermex, all awards will vest for an NEO if (a) the award is not assumed in the change in control and (b) the award in assumed in the change in control but within two years following the change in control the NEO’s employment is terminated without Cause (as defined in the 2020 Plan form of award agreement).

For awards of PSUs under the 2020 Plan standard form, if a change in control (as defined in the 2020 Plan) of Intermex occurs, the PSUs will generally convert into RSUs if the award is assumed in the change in control and the RSUs will continue to vest either based on target or based on attainment of performance goals through the change in control, but the other vesting rules applicable to RSU awards under the 2020 Plan will then apply (either full acceleration of vesting if no assumption of the RSU in the change in control or full acceleration of vesting following a termination without Cause within 2 years following the change in control). In addition, in the event of a termination without Cause (as defined in the 2020 Plan form PSU agreement) after the first year of the performance period, a pro rata portion of the PSUs may vest depending upon attainment of performance goals identified in the PSU agreement. Except for the terms of the awards for Mr. Lisy as described above, awards of RSUs and PSUs granted to NEOs in March 2021 each contain the terms set forth in the standard form of RSU and PSU agreement, as applicable.

Compensation of Directors

The directors for fiscal year 2020 included Robert Lisy, Justin Wender, Adam Godfrey, Robert Jahn, John Rincon, Stephen Paul, Kurt Holstein, Michael Purcell, Christopher Lofgren and Laura Maydón. Only the independent non-employee directors of the Company, John Rincon, Kurt Holstein, Michael Purcell, Christopher Lofgren and Laura Maydón, received compensation for their service as directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. Robert Jahn and Stephen Paul retired from the Board of Directors effective September 14, 2020; Laura Maydón joined the Board of Directors effective October 15, 2020.

Until September 30, 2020, the compensation of the independent non-employee directors consisted of the following: (a) annual cash retainer amount of $50,000; (b) an additional annual cash retainer of $35,000 for the Audit Committee Chair and an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000 for each non-chair member of the Audit Committee; (c) an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 for the Compensation Committee Chair and an additional annual cash retainer of $7,500 for each non-chair member of the Compensation Committee; (d) an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000 for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair and an additional annual cash retainer of $5,000 for non-chair members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; and (e) $70,000 paid in an equity-based award, vesting on the one-year anniversary of the grant date.
70


Effective October 1, 2020, the Compensation Committee of the Board approved the following changes to the compensation of the independent non-employee directors: (a) the Lead Independent Director will receive an annual retainer of $36,000 in cash and $36,000 in an award of fully vested shares, payable on a quarterly basis, at the end of each quarter; (b) the Audit Committee Chair will receive an annual retainer of $12,000 in cash and $12,000 in an award of fully vested shares, payable on a quarterly basis, at the end of each quarter; (c) the Compensation Committee Chair and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair will each receive an annual retainer of $8,000 in cash and $8,000 in an award of fully vested shares, payable on a quarterly basis at the end of each quarter; (d) the non-chair members of all committees will each receive an annual retainer of $8,000 in cash payable on an annual basis; and (e) the equity portion of the annual retainer for all independent non-employee directors was increased to $100,000, payable on an annual basis in an equity-based award that vests on the one-year anniversary of the grant date. Independent non-employee directors will also each continue to receive an annual cash retainer of $50,000, payable on an annual basis.

Also, all members of our Board of Directors are reimbursed for their usual and customary expenses incurred in connection with attending all Board and other committee meetings.

Director Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2020

The following table sets forth information for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Walter Beach, Chair

Shami Patel

Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

2020 regarding the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our independent non-employee directors:


Director(1)
Fees earned or
paid in cash
($)
Stock
awards
($)(2)(3)
Total
($)
John Rincon$67,125$92,110$159,235
Kurt Holstein$67,750$92,110$159,860
Michael Purcell$95,406$92,110$187,516
Christopher Lofgren$61,500$92,110$153,610
Laura Maydón(4)
$31,500$69,900$101,400

(1)Does not include any non-independent directors, including directors who also serve as officers of the Company, as these directors do not receive compensation for their service on the Board of Directors.

(2)Amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value of restricted stock units issued to each of the Company’s independent directors during fiscal year 2020 as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation reflected in these columns, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(3)Represents the aggregate number of unvested restricted stock units outstanding for each of our independent directors as of December 31, 2020.

(4)Ms. Maydón joined the Board effective October 15, 2020.
71


ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth information about our common stock that may be issued under all of our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2020, which included: the International Money Express, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (“2018 Plan”) the International Money Express, Inc. 2020 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (“2020 Plan”) and the International Money Express, Inc. 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), each of which was approved by the Company’s stockholders. The 2018 Plan was terminated effective June 26, 2020.

Plan categoryNumber of securities
to be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, RSUs, warrants
and rights
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, RSUs, warrants
and rights
Number of securities remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(a)(b)(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders2,755,783 $11.00 4,084,111 (1)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders— — — 
Total2,755,783 $11.00 4,084,111 

(1)Represents 3,334,111 shares available for issuance under the 2020 Plan and 750,000 shares available for issuance under the ESPP.
72


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our outstanding shares of common stock as of February 28, 2018,March 5, 2021 by:

each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock;
each of our officers and directors that beneficially owns shares of our common stock; and
all our officers and directors as a group. 

53
(a) each person or “group” (as such term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) who is known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our shares of Common Stock, (b) each of our directors and each of our NEOs, and (c) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of the common stock owned by them.


Unless otherwise provided, beneficial ownership of common stock of the Company is based on 38,218,156 shares of common stock of the Company issued and outstanding as of March 5, 2021.

Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them. The followingowned.

Name of Beneficial Owners
Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned
(1)
Percentage of Common Stock Beneficially Owned
(2)
Directors and Executive Officers:(3)
Robert Lisy (4)1,847,111 4.8 %
Tony Lauro— — 
Randall D. Nilsen (5)285,922 *
Joseph Aguilar31,250 *
Adam Godfrey (6)3,192,076 8.4 %
Kurt Holstein (7)90,276 *
Michael Purcell (8)12,453 *
Christopher Lofgren (9)23,131 *
Laura Maydón (10)— — 
John Rincon (11)897,400 2.3 %
Justin Wender (7)3,192,076 8.4 %
All directors and executive officers as a group (13 individuals)6,494,619 17.0 %
Five Percent Holders:
SPC Intermex, LP (12)3,192,076 8.4 %
Wellington Management Group LLP (13)3,504,023 9.2 %
Federated Hermes, Inc. (14)2,834,830 7.4 %
Conifer Management, L.L.C. (15)2,594,241 6.8 %
Steamboat Capital Partners, LLC (16)2,530,448 6.6 %
BlackRock, Inc. (17)2,286,855 5.9 %
Royce & Associates, LP (18)2,175,182 5.7 %
Nantahala Capital Management, LLC (19)2,134,092 5.6 %
*    Less than 1 percent.

(1)For purposes of this table, does not reflect recorda person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if he or beneficialshe (a) has or shares voting power or dispositive power with respect to such security, or (b) has the right to acquire such ownership within 60 days. “Voting power” is the power to vote or direct the voting of shares, and “dispositive power” is the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares, irrespective of any economic interest in such shares.

(2)In calculating the percentage ownership or percent of equity vote for a given individual or group, the number of common shares outstanding includes unissued shares subject to options, warrants, as no warrants arerights or conversion privileges, exercisable within 60 days.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owners Number of Shares Beneficially Owned  Percentage 
Directors and Executive Officers:(1)      
Walter T. Beach     *
Betsy Z. Cohen  592,827(2)  2.5%
Daniel G. Cohen  5,165,912(3)  21.6%
Jeremy Kuiper  57,045    * 
James J. McEntee, III  410,504(4)  1.7%
Shami Patel  57,045    * 
All directors and executive officers as a group (six individuals)  6,283,333   26.3%
Greater than 5% Beneficial Owners        
Davidson Kempner Capital Management LP(5)  1,336,543   5.6%
Polar Asset Management Partners Inc.(6)  2,685,000   11.2%
FinTech Investor Holdings II, LLC  3,609,678   15.1%

*Less than 1 percent.
1.

days of March 5, 2021, held by such individual or group, but are not deemed outstanding by any other person or group.


73

(3)Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of the persons and entities listed above is 2929 Arch Street, Suite 1703, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

2.Includes 200,000 shares held by a family trust for which Mrs. Cohen may be deemed to be a beneficial owner.  Mrs. Cohen’s grandchildren are the beneficiaries of the trust.
3.

Includes 3,609,678 shares (including 390,000 shares underlying units) held by our sponsor. Mr. Cohen is the managing member of our sponsor, shares voting and investment power over shares held by our sponsor and disclaims beneficial ownership over any securities owned by our sponsor in which he does not have any pecuniary interest. Includes 513,407 shares held by DGC Family FinTech Trust for which Mr. Cohen may be deemed to be a beneficial owner. Mr. Cohen’s children are the beneficiaries of DGC Family FinTech Trust. Includes 500,000 shares held by Cohen Sponsor Interests II, LLC for which Mr. Cohen may be deemed to be a beneficial owner.

4.Includes 370,795 shares held by the Swarthmore Trust of 2016 for which Mr. McEntee may be deemed to be a beneficial owner.  Mr. McEntee’s children are the beneficiaries of the Swarthmore Trust of 2016.
5.

Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2018, Davidson Kemper Capital Management, L.P. (“DKCM”) shares voting and investment power with the following entities and persons: Davidson Kempner Partners (“DKP”) (236,034 shares); Davidson Kempner Institutional Partners, L.P. (“DKIP”) (532,745 shares); Davidson Kempner International, Ltd. (“DKIL”) (567,764 shares); Thomas L. Kempner, Jr. (1,336,543 shares); and Anthony A. Yoseloff (1,336,543 shares). DKCM is the investment manager to each of DKP, DKIP and DKIL. Messrs. Kempner and Yoseloff, through their involvement in DKCM, are responsible for the voting and investment decisions relating to the securities held by DKP, DKIP and DKIL. The business address of each reporting person is c/o Davidson Kempner Capital Management LP, 520 Madison Avenue, 30th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

6.Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2018 by Polar Asset Management Partners Inc.  Polar Asset Management Partners Inc. serves as the investment manager to Polar Multi Strategy Master Fund, a Cayman Islands exempted company ("PMSMF") and certain managed accounts (together with PMSMF, the "Polar Vehicles"), with respect to the shares directly held by the Polar Vehicles.  The address of Polar Asset Management Partners Inc. is 401 Bay Street, Suite 1900, PO Box 19, Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y4, Canada.

54

Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Founder shares

On May 28, 2015, we issued an aggregate of 5,298,333 founder shares to the initial holders for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000. In January 2017, we issued an additional 701,667 founder shares to certain of the initial holders for an aggregate purchase price of $3,311. As such, total founderdirectors and executive officers is 9480 South Dixie Highway, Miami, Florida 33156.


(4)Includes (i) 438,531 shares of 6,000,000 included an aggregate of up to 760,000held by Hawk Time Enterprises, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Hawk Time”), (ii) 813,629 shares subject to forfeitureheld by the initial holders to the extent that the underwriters’ over-allotment was not exercised in full or in part, so that the initial holders would collectively own 25% of our issuedRobert Lisy Family Revocable Living Trust (the “Lisy Trust”) and outstanding(iii) 594,951 shares after the initial public offering. As a result of the underwriters’ election to exercise their over-allotment option to purchase 2,200,000 units on January 25, 2017 and waiver of the remainder of their over-allotment option, 733,333 founder shares were no longer subject to forfeiture and 26,667 founder shares were forfeited. On March 8, 2017, Betsy Cohen transferred 200,000 of her founder shares to a family trust. On September 5, 2017, our sponsor transferred 30,000 founder shares to Cohen and Company LLC. On November 27, 2017, Daniel Cohen transferred 50,000 of his founder shares to Plamen Mitrikov. On December 11, 2017, Betsy Cohen, Daniel Cohen and James J. McEntee transferred an aggregate of 500,000 founder shares to Cohen Sponsor Interests II, LLC.

The initial holders have agreed not to transfer, assign or sell any of their founder shares (except to permitted transferees) until (i) with respect to 20% of such shares, upon consummation of our initial business combination, (ii) with respect to 20% of such shares, when the closing price of our common stock exceeds $12.00 for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period following the consummation of a business combination, (iii) with respect to 20% of such shares, when the closing price of our common stock exceeds $13.50 for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period following the consummation of a business combination, (iv) with respect to 20% of such shares, when the closing price of our common stock exceeds $15.00 for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period following the consummation of a business combination and (v) with respect to 20% of such shares, when the closing price of our common stock exceeds $17.00 for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period following the consummation of a business combination or earlier, in any case, if, following a business combination, we engage in a subsequent transaction (1) resulting in our shareholders having the right to exchange their shares for cash or other securities or (2) involving a consolidation, merger or other change in the majority of our board of directors or management team in which we are the surviving entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with an initial business combination, the initial holders may transfer, assign or sell their founder shares with our consent to any person or entity that agrees in writing to be bound by the transfer restrictions set forth in the prior sentence.

Private Placement

Simultaneously with the initial public offering, our sponsor and Cantor purchased an aggregate of 420,000 placement units (390,000 placement units by our sponsor and 30,000 placement units by Cantor) at a price of $10.00 per unit (or an aggregate purchase price of $4,200,000). Each placement unit consists of one placement share and one-half of one placement warrant to purchase one share of our common stock exercisable at $11.50. The proceeds from the placement units and the proceeds from the initial public offering totaling $175,000,000 are held in the trust account. There will be no redemption rights or liquidating distributions from the trust account with respect to the placement shares or placement warrants. 

The placement warrants are identical to the warrants included in the units sold in the initial public offering, except that if held by our sponsor, Cantor or their permitted assigns, they (a) may be exercised for cash or on a cashless basis, (b) are not subject to being called for redemption and (c) they (including our common stockMr. Lisy, representing shares issuable upon exercise of these warrants) may not, subject to certain limited exceptions, be transferred, assigned or sold byoptions that are exercisable as of January 31, 2021. Mr. Lisy is the holders until 30 days after the consummationsole manager of our initial business combination. There are no redemption rights or liquidating distributions with respect to the founder shares, placement shares or warrants, which will expire worthless if we do not complete the Merger or another initial business combination.

Promissory Note — Related Party

Prior to the closingHawk Time and sole trustee of the initial public offering, our sponsor loaned us $231,846 for expenses relatedLisy Trust.


(5)Includes 115,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are exercisable as of January 31, 2021.

(6)Includes 3,192,076 shares held by SPC Intermex, LP, whose general partner is SPC Intermex GP, LLC. Stella Point Capital (“Stella Point”) is the sole manager of SPC Intermex GP, LLC, and Messrs. Godfrey and Wender are Managing Partners of Stella Point and as a result of their position they may be deemed to our formationbe the beneficial owner of those shares. Messrs. Godfrey and the initial public offering. The loan was non-interest bearing, unsecured and dueWender serve on the earlierBoard of June 30, 2017 or the closingDirectors of the initial public offering.Company as representatives of Stella Point. The loan was repaid uponownership information set forth herein is based in its entirety on the closingmaterial contained in Schedule 13D, as amended, dated November 5, 2020, filed with the SEC by Messrs. Godfrey and Wender, along with certain other filing parties. Based on the Schedule 13D, as amended, Messrs. Godfrey and Wender are each the beneficial owner of the initial public offering on January 25, 2017.

Related Party Loans

In order to finance transaction costs in connectionan aggregate of 3,192,076 shares with a business combination, our sponsor has committed to loan us funds as may be required up to a maximumshared voting power over 3,192,076 shares and shared dispositive power over 3,192,076 shares. Messrs. Godfrey and Wender disclaim beneficial ownership of $1,100,000 (“Working Capital Loans”), which will be repaid upon the consummation of a business combination. However, if we do not consummate a business combination prior to January 25, 2019, we may use funds held outside the trust account to repay the Working Capital Loans; however, no proceeds from the trust account may be used for such repayment, other than interest income earned thereon in an amount, when taken together with amounts released to us for working capital purposes, that does not exceed $500,000. If such funds are insufficient to repay the Working Capital Loans, the unpaid amounts would be forgiven. Any part or all of the Working Capital Loans may be converted into additional warrants at $0.75 per one-half of one warrant (warrants to purchase a maximum of 733,333 whole shares if the full $1,100,000 is loaned and that amount is converted into warrants) of the post-business combination entity at the option of our sponsor. The warrants would be identical to the placement warrants. There were no Working Capital Loans outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

55

Registration Rights

Pursuant to a registration rights agreement entered into on January 19, 2017, the holders of the founder shares, placement units (including any securities contained therein) and the warrants that may be issued upon conversion of the Working Capital Loans (and any shares of common stock issuable uponheld by SPC Intermex, LP. The address for Messrs. Godfrey and Wender is c/o Stella Point Capital LLC, 444 Madison Ave., 25th Floor, New York, New York 10022.


(7)Mr. Holstein, who owns 90,276 shares on a personal basis, currently serves on the exerciseBoard of Directors of the placement warrantsCompany. Excludes 7,144 shares deliverable within 30 days after vesting of restricted stock units on June 26, 2021.

(8)Mr. Purcell, who owns 12,453 shares on a personal basis, currently serves on the Board of Directors of the Company. Excludes 7,144 shares deliverable within 30 days after vesting of restricted stock units on June 26, 2021.

(9)Mr. Lofgren, who owns 23,131 shares on a personal basis, currently serves on the Board of Directors of the Company. Excludes 7,144 shares deliverable within 30 days after vesting of restricted stock units on June 26, 2021.

(10)Ms. Maydón currently serves on the Board of Directors of the Company. Excludes 4,805 shares deliverable within 30 days after vesting of restricted stock units on June 26, 2021.

(11)Includes (i) 11,681 shares held by Mr. Rincon, (ii) 705,288 shares held by Latin American Investment Holdings, Inc. and (iii) 180,431 shares held by Rincon Capital Partners, LLC. Mr. Rincon owns 100% of Latin American Investment Holdings, Inc. (“LAIH”) and jointly owns Rincon Capital Partners, LLC (“Rincon LLC”). Excludes 7,144 shares of which are deliverable to Mr. Ricon within 30 days after vesting of restricted stock units on June 26, 2021. Mr. Rincon owns 100% of LAIH and jointly owns Rincon LLC and is its managing member.

(12)Includes 3,192,706 shares held by SPC Intermex, LP. The ownership information set forth herein is based in its entirety on the information contained in the Schedule 13D, as amended, filed with the SEC on November 5, 2020 by SPC Intermex, LP, SPC Intermex GP, LLC and Stella Point, along with certain other filing parties. Based on the Schedule 13D, as amended, SPC Intermex, LP is the beneficial owner of an aggregate of 3,192,706 shares with shared voting power over 3,192,706 shares and shared dispositive power over 3,192,706 shares. The general partner of SPC Intermex, LP is SPC Intermex GP, LLC and Stella Point is the sole manager of SPC Intermex GP, LLC. Messrs. Godfrey and Wender are the Managing Partners of and jointly control Stella Point. SPC Intermex GP, LLC, Stella Point, and Messrs. Godfrey and Wender may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the shares held of record by SPC Intermex, LP, but disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares. See “Risk Factors - Because Stella Point controls a significant percentage of our common stock, it may influence our major corporate decisions and its interests may conflict with the interests of other holders of our common stock” in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The address for SPC Intermex, LP is c/o Stella Point Capital LLC, 444 Madison Ave., 25th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

(13)Based solely on the information contained in the Schedule 13G, as amended, jointly filed with the SEC on February 4, 2021 by Wellington Management Group LLP (“WMG”), Wellington Group Holdings LLP (“WGH”), Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP (“WIAH”) and Wellington Management Company LLP (“WMC” and collectively with WMG, WGH and WIAH, the “Wellington Group”), each of WMG, WGH and WIAH is the beneficial owner of 3,504,023 shares with shared voting and shared dispositive power over all of such shares, and WMC is the beneficial owner of 3,462,012 shares with shared voting and shared dispositive power over all of such shares. The shares were acquired by the following subsidiaries of WMG, as the parent holding company of certain holding companies and investment advisors: WGH, WIAH, Wellington Management Global Holdings, Ltd., WMC, Wellington Management Canada LLC, Wellington Management Singapore Pte Ltd, Wellington Management Hong Kong Ltd, Wellington Management International Ltd, Wellington Management Japan Pte Ltd, and Wellington
74

Management Australia Pty Ltd. The address for the Wellington Group is c/o Wellington Management Company LLP 280 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210.

(14)Based solely on the information contained in the Schedule 13G jointly filed with the SEC on February 12, 2021 by Federated Hermes, Inc. (“Federated”), Voting Shares Irrevocable Trust (“Voting Shares Trust”) and Thomas R. Donahue, Rhodora J. Donahue and J. Christopher Donahue (collectively “Donahue”), Federated and Voting Shares Trust may each be deemed to be the beneficial owner of 2,834,830 shares with sole voting and sole dispositive power over all of such shares, and Donahue may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of 2,834,830 shares with shared voting and shared dispositive power over all of such shares. As the managing members of Federated, Donahue may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of such shares. The address for each of Federated and Messrs. Donahue is 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3779.

(15)Based solely on the information contained in the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021 by Conifer Management, L.L.C. (“Conifer”), Conifer may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of 2,594,241 shares with sole voting and sole dispositive power over all of such shares. The address for Conifer is 9 West 57th Street, Suite 5000, New York, New York 10019-2701.

(16)Based solely on the information contained in the Schedule 13D, as amended, jointly filed with the SEC on January 7, 2021 by Steamboat Capital Partners, LLC (“Steamboat”) and Parsa Kiai, Steamboat may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of 2,530,448 shares with sole voting power over 2,346,915 shares and sole dispositive power over 2,530,448 shares and Parsa Kiai may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of 2,530,448 shares with sole voting power over 2,346,915 shares and sole dispositive power over 2,530,448 shares. The address for each of Steamboat and Parsa Kiai is 31 Old Wagon Road, Old Greenwich, CT 06870.

(17)Based solely on the information contained in the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 2, 2021 by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”), BlackRock is the beneficial owner of 2,286,855 shares with sole voting power over 2,191,982 shares and sole dispositive power over 2,286,855 shares. The shares were acquired by the following subsidiaries of BlackRock: BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, National Association, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Japan Co., Ltd., BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, and BlackRock Investment Management, LLC. The address for BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(18)Based solely on the information contained in the Schedule 13G, as amended, filed jointly with the SEC on January 27, 2021 by Royce & Associates, LP (“Royce”), Royce may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of 2,175,182 shares with sole voting and sole dispositive power over all of such shares. The address for Royce is 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10151.

(19)Based solely on the information contained in the Schedule 13G, as amended, jointly filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021 by Nantahala Capital Management, LLC (“Nantahala”), Wilmot B. Harkey and Daniel Mack, Nantahala may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of 2,134,092 shares with shared voting and shared dispositive power over all of such shares. As the managing members of Nantahala, each of Messrs. Harkey and Mack may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of such shares. The address for each of Nantahala and Messrs. Harkey and Mack is 130 Main St. 2nd Floor, New Canaan, CT 06840.
75


ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Review of Related Party Transactions

In accordance with the charter for the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, our Audit Committee reviews and approves in advance any proposed related person transactions. For purposes of these procedures, “related person” and “transaction” have the meanings contained in Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

Our Board has also adopted a written related person transaction policy that sets forth the policies and procedures for the review and approval or ratification of related person transactions. In accordance with our Related Person Transactions Policy and Procedures, either the Audit Committee or the warrants issued upon conversionaffirmative vote of a majority of directors who do not have a direct or indirect material interest in such related party transaction must review and approve all transactions in which (i) the Company or one of its subsidiaries is a participant, (ii) the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and (iii) a related person has a direct or indirect material interest, other than transactions available to all employees of the Working Capital Loans) are entitledCompany generally.

In assessing a related party transaction brought before it for approval the Audit Committee considers, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the related party transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to registration rights.an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction. The holdersAudit Committee may then approve or disapprove the transaction in its discretion.

Certain Related Person Transactions

Since the beginning of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, there has not been, nor is there, any currently proposed transaction or series of similar transactions to which the Company was or is to be a party in which the amount involved exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 and in which any related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than as set forth in the sections captioned “Executive Compensation”, “Director Compensation Table” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” above, in the second paragraph under the section captioned “Secondary Offerings” under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or as disclosed below. In addition, please see the section captioned “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for descriptions of risks that may arise as a result of these securities are entitled to make up to three demands, excluding short form demands,and other such relationships and related person transactions.

Registration Rights

On the Closing Date, the Company entered into the Registration Rights Agreement with certain of FinTech’s initial stockholders and certain of the Company’s legacy stockholders, including entities affiliated with Messrs. Godfrey, Wender, Rincon, Lisy and Holstein, our former directors, Messrs. Jahn and Paul, two of our executives, Messrs. Lisy, and Nilsen, and two of our former executives, Messrs. Azcarate and Perez-Villareal, that we register such securities. In addition, the holders haveprovides certain “piggy-back” registration rights with respect to the shares of the Company’s common stock. The Registration Rights Agreement requires the Company to, among other things, file a resale shelf registration statements filedstatement on behalf of the stockholders party to the Registration Rights Agreement as promptly as practicable upon request by us. WeStella Point following the closing of the Merger. Two members of our Board, Messrs. Godfrey and Wender, are Managing Partners of Stella Point. Our former director, Robert Jahn, also serves as a Managing Director of Stella Point. The Registration Rights Agreement also provides the stockholders party to the agreement the right (such right, the “Demand Registration Right”) to require the Company to effect one or more shelf registrations under the Securities Act, covering all or part of such stockholder’s common stock upon written request to the Company. Demand Registration Rights are available exclusively to Stella Point for the first 15 months after the closing of the Merger, and thereafter to certain other stockholders party to the Registration Rights Agreement. The Registration Rights Agreement additionally provides piggyback rights to the stockholders party to the Registration Rights Agreement, subject to customary underwriter cutbacks and issuer blackout periods. The Company also agreed to pay certain fees and expenses relating to registrations under the Registration Rights Agreement.

On September 30, 2020, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement with certain selling stockholders, including entities affiliated with Messrs. Godfrey, Wender, Rincon and Lisy, and several underwriters relating to the underwritten public offering of 4.9 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a price to the public of $13.50 per share. The closing of the offering occurred on October 5, 2020. Also, on November 4, 2020, the underwriters completed the purchase of 0.7 million additional shares of common stock at the same price as the initial shares under a 30-day option granted by certain of the selling stockholders. The Company did not receive any of the proceeds from the offering.

Shareholders Agreement

On the Closing Date of the Merger, the Company entered into an agreement by and between certain shareholders (the “Shareholders Agreement”), including entities affiliated with Messrs. Godfrey, Wender and Lisy, two former directors, Messrs. Jahn and Paul, two of our executives, Messrs. Lisy and Nilsen, and two former executives, Messrs. Azcarate and Perez-Villareal. Pursuant to the Shareholders
76

Agreement, for so long as the Company’s legacy stockholders party thereto hold, in the aggregate, at least 10% of the total outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, SPC Intermex will bearbe entitled to designate eight individuals for election to the expenses incurred in connection withCompany’s Board of Directors of which at least three designees must qualify as an “independent director” under the filingExchange Act and Nasdaq rules. Following such times as the collective ownership of any such registration statements. 

Conflictslegacy stockholders is less than 10% of Interest

In general, officers and directorsthe outstanding shares of a Delaware corporationthe Company’s common stock, SPC Intermex will be entitled to designate one person for election to the Company’s Board of Directors, which designation right will lapse at such time as the Company’s legacy stockholders’ collective ownership is less than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Pursuant to the Shareholders Agreement, all of the stockholders party thereto are required to present business opportunitiesvote their shares of the Company’s common stock subject to the corporation if:

the corporation could financially undertake the opportunity;
the opportunity is within the corporation’s line of business; and
it would not be fair to the corporation and its stockholders for the opportunity not to be brought to the attention of the corporation.

Our amendedShareholders Agreement as set forth therein for the director nominees designated thereunder; however, on October 5, 2020, the Company, FinTech Investor Holdings II and restated certificate of incorporation provides, however, that the doctrine of corporate opportunity, or any other analogous doctrine, does not apply to us or any of our officers or directors or in circumstances that would conflict with any current or future fiduciary duties or contractual obligations.

Accordingly, if any of our officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity that falls within the line of business of any entity to which he or she has pre-existing fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she may be required to present the opportunity to such entity prior to presenting the opportunity to us or, if he or she is subject to a non-compete obligation that includes business opportunities, he or she may be prohibited from referring such opportunity to us. Below is a table summarizing the companies to which our officers and directors owe fiduciary obligations that could conflict with their fiduciary obligations to us, all of which may have to (i) be presented appropriate potential target businesses by our officers or directors, and (ii) reject the opportunity to acquire such potential target business, before the opportunity may be presented to us:

IndividualEntityAffiliation
Betsy Z. CohenAetna, Inc.Director
Daniel G. CohenThe Bancorp, Inc.
Institutional Financial Markets, Inc.
J.V.B. Financial Group,SPC Intermex Representative LLC
Director
Chief Executive Officer
Chairman
James J. McEntee, IIIThe Bancorp, Inc.
Institutional Financial Markets, Inc.
J.V.B. Financial Group, LLC
Director
Chief Operating Officer
Co-Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer
Walter T. BeachThe Bancorp, Inc.Director
Jeremy KuiperThe Bancorp, Inc.Managing Director
Shami PatelPacific View VenturesGeneral Partner

Messrs. Cohen, McEntee, Beach and Kuiper are executive officers and/or directors of Bancorp, a financial holding company, and its subsidiary bank, Bancorp Bank, which provide banking and other financial services, including prepaid and debit cards, private label banking, healthcare accounts and merchant card processing. As such, they are required to present corporate opportunities relating to the current business of Bancorp and Bancorp Bank, as well as businesses that may be undertaken by a financial holding company under federal banking law, prior to presenting them to us.

Mr. Cohen is also an executive and/or director of IFMI, a financial services company specializing in credit-related fixed income investments, including fixed income sales, trading and financing, and management of fixed income assets, and one of its subsidiaries, JVB Financial. Mr. McEntee is the Chief Operating Officer and Co-Vice Chairman of IFMI and JVB Financial. As such, each of Mr. Cohen and Mr. McEntee are obligated to present corporate opportunities relating to such businesses to the respective companies prior to presenting those opportunities to us.

56

Mrs. Cohen is a director of Aetna, Inc., an insurance company. As such, Mrs. Cohen is obligated to present corporate opportunities relating to such businesses to Aetna prior to presenting those opportunities to us.

Mr. Patel is a general partner of Pacific View Ventures, an investment advisory firm. As such, he is required to present corporate opportunities relating to such business to Pacific View Ventures prior to presenting them to us.

We do not believe that any of the foregoing pre-existing fiduciary duties will materially affect our ability to consummate our initial business combination because, although the foregoing entities are involved in the financial services industry broadly defined, the specific industry focuses of a majority of these entities differ from our focus on financial technology businesses.

Messrs. Cohen, McEntee and Beach are affiliated with Bancorp, and Mr. Cohen is the son of Mrs. Cohen. These relationships may influence the roles taken by our officers and directors with respect to us. In particular, one of our directors or officers may be less likely to object to a course of action with respect to our activities because it may jeopardize his or her relationships with the others.

Each of our officers and directors may become involved with subsequent blank check companies similar to our company although, pursuant to a letter agreement, they have agreed not to participate in the formation of, or become an officer or director of, any blank check company until we have entered into a definitive agreement regardingWaiver to the Shareholders Agreement, pursuant to which the obligation of each party to the Shareholders Agreement (other than SPC Intermex LP) to vote to elect and/or maintain in office as members of the Company’s board of directors the individuals nominated by SPC Intermex Representative LLC was irrevocably and permanently waived. In addition, for so long as FinTech’s initial stockholders that are party to the Shareholders Agreement collectively own more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock, FinTech Investor Holdings II, LLC, as representative, is entitled to designate one person as a non-voting observer to the Company’s Board of Directors. See “Risk Factors - Because Stella Point controls a significant percentage of our initial business combination, failed to completecommon stock, it may influence our initial business combination by January 25, 2019 or liquidated prior to January 25, 2019.

major corporate decisions and its interests may conflict with the interests of other holders of our common stock” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.


Director Independence

The


Nasdaq listing rules require that a majority of the board of directors of a company listed on Nasdaq must be composed of “independent directors,” which is defined generally as a person other than an officer or employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship, which, in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. We haveOur Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Beach, KuiperMichael Purcell, Kurt Holstein, Christopher Lofgren, John Rincon and PatelLaura Maydón are independent directors under the Nasdaq listing rules and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.

57
In making these determinations, our Board of Directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director had with FinTech Acquisition Corp. II and Intermex Holdings II, Inc. and has with the Company and all other facts and circumstances our Board of Directors deemed relevant in determining independence, including the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each non-employee director, and the transactions involving them. In addition, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Purcell as the Lead Independent Director, effective September 2020.

77

Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.  



ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The firmfollowing tables present fees for professional audit services rendered by BDO USA, LLP for the audit of WithumSmith+Brown, PC acted as our independent registered public accounting firm duringthe Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016. The following is a summary of fees paid to WithumSmith+Brown, PC for services rendered.

Audit Fees

During the years ended December 31, 20172019, and 2016, audit fees for our independent registered public accounting firm were $51,000 and $0, respectively. Audit fees consist of fees billed for professionalthe other services rendered during those periods.

20202019
Audit fees (1)$692,932 $669,200 
Audit-related fees (2)$— $— 
Tax fees (3)$— $— 
All other fees (4)$— $— 

(1)Audit Fees

Audit fees include the aggregate fees for the audit of our year-endannual consolidated financial statements included in our Forms 10-K and the reviews of each of the quarterly consolidated financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q, as well as work generally only the independent registered certified public accountants can reasonably be expected to provide, such as statutory and other audit work performed with respect to certain of our subsidiaries. Such audit fees also include professional services for comfort letters, consents and reviews of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(2)Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees primarily include fees, not included in “Audit Fees” above, for assurance and related services traditionally performed by the independent auditor. These services would include, among others, due diligence related to transactions or events, including acquisitions, and attest services related to financial reporting that are not required by statute or regulation.

(3)Tax Fees

Tax fees would consist of assistance with tax compliance services, preparation of tax returns, tax planning, and providing tax guidance. No such products and services that are normallywere provided by WithumSmith+Brown, PC in connection with regulatory filings.

Audit-Related Fees

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, audit-related fees for our independent registered public accounting firm were $42,500 and $22,000, respectively.

Tax Fees

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, our independent registered public accounting firm did not render any tax services to us.

relevant periods.


(4)All Other Fees

During


All other fees would consist of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were noaggregate fees billed for products and services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm other than those set forth above.

Audit Committee the services described under audit fees, audit-related fees and tax fees. No such products and services were provided in the relevant periods.


Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our audit committee, on at least an annual basis, reviews audit and non-audit services performed by WithumSmith+Brown, PC as well as


All of the fees chargeddescribed above were approved by WithumSmith+Brown, PCthe Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is responsible for such services. Ouroverseeing the audit fee negotiations associated with the retention of BDO USA LLP to perform the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee has adopted a pre-approval policy is thatunder which the Audit Committee approves in advance all audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditors. As part of its pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee considers whether the provision of any proposed non-audit services is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. If there are any additional services to be provided, a request for pre-approval must be pre-approvedsubmitted by management to the audit committee. AllAudit Committee for its consideration under the policy. Finally, in accordance with the pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to each of such services and fees were pre-approved duringits members. Any member who exercises this authority must report any pre-approval decisions to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

58
Audit Committee at its next meeting.

78


PART IV

Item 15.EXHIBITS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a)
ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1) 

Consolidated Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements required by this Item 15(a)(1) are set forth in “Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”

(2) Consolidated Financial Statements Schedule

None.

(3)Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of or incorporated by reference into,this report:

1.Financial Statements (See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K);
2.Financial Statement Schedule (See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K);
3.The exhibits listed in the "Exhibit Index" attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.Description
1.1Exhibit No.Underwriting Agreement, dated January 19, 2017, between the Company and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.(1)Document
2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated December 19, 2017, by and among FinTech Acquisition Corp. II, FinTech II Merger Sub Inc., FinTech II Merger Sub 2 LLC, Intermex Holdings II, Inc. and SPC Intermex Representative LLC(3)
3.1**
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Secretary of State of the State of DelawareCompany, dated July 26, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on January 20, 2017(1)Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
3.2
3.2**
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws(2)Bylaws of the Company, effective as of July 26, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
4.1Specimen Unit Certificate(2)
4.2
4.1**
Specimen Common Stock Certificate(2)
4.3Specimen Warrant Certificate(2)
4.4Warrant Agreement, dated January 19, 2017, between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Company(1)Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
10.1
4.2**
LetterAmendment No. 1 to Warrant Agreement, dated January 19, 2017,April 29, 2019, by and between the CompanyInternational Money Express, Inc. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.(1)
10.2Letter Agreement, dated January 19, 2017, by and among the Company and certain security holders, officers and directors of the Company(1)
10.3Placement Unit Subscription Agreement dated December 23, 2016 with FinTech Investor Holdings II, LLC(2)
10.4Placement Unit Subscription Agreement dated December 23, 2016 with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.(2)
10.5Investment Management Trust Account Agreement, dated January 19, 2017, between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company(1)Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K Filed on April 30, 2019).
10.6
4.3**
Registration RightsShareholders Agreement, dated January 19, 2017,July 26, 2018, between the Company and certain security holders(1)the stockholders of the Company signatory thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
10.7
4.4**
Loan CommitmentShareholders Agreement Amendment, dated January 19, 2017,as of December 12, 2018, by and between the Company and FinTech Investor Holdings II, LLC(1)
10.8Form of Indemnity Agreement(2)
10.9Promissory Note for expenses prior to initial public offering expenses fromamong FinTech Investor Holdings II, LLC, the Company and SPC Intermex Representative LLC (incorporated by reference to Registrant(2)Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on filed on December 14, 2018).
10.10
4.5**
Shareholders Agreement Waiver dated August 23, 2019, among Fintech Investor Holdings II, LLC, the Company and SPC Intermex Representative LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K Filed on August 23, 2019).
Shareholders Agreement Waiver, dated October 5, 2020, among the Company, FinTech Investor Holdings II and SPC Intermex Representative LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 6, 2020).
4.7**
Description of Securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K Filed on March 11, 2020).
Credit Agreement, dated November 7, 2018, by and among Intermex Wire Transfer, LLC, Intermex Holdings, Inc., International Money Express, Inc., International Money Express Sub 2, LLC, each Guarantor, and KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent and L/C Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on filed on November 8, 2018).
Amendment No. 1, dated as of December 19, 2017,7, 2018 to the Credit by and among Intermex Wire Transfer, LLC, Intermex Holdings, Inc., International Money Express, Inc., International Money Express Sub 2, LLC, each Guarantor, and KeyBank National Association, as Administrative Agent and L/C Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on filed on December 10, 2018).
Increase Joinder No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated March 25, 2019, by and among International Money Express, Inc., as Holdings, International Money Express Sub 2, LLC, as Intermediate Holdings, Intermex Holdings, Inc., as the Term Borrower, Intermex Wire Transfer, LLC, as the Revolver Borrower, the other guarantors from time to time party thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto and Keybank National Association, as the administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 30, 2019).
Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 26, 2018, by and among FinTech Acquisition Corp. II, SPC Investors, Minority Investors and Additional Investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 29, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 30, 2019).
Registration Rights Agreement Waiver dated August 23, 2019, among Fintech Investor Holdings II, LLC, International Money Express, Inc. and SPC Intermex, LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 23, 2019).
Settlement Agreement and Release, dated March 16, 2020, among Stuart Sawyer, on behalf of himself and all Settlement Class Members, and Intermex Wire Transfer, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 19, 2020).
10.5**†
International Money Express, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3(a) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
10.6**†
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Robert Lisy) pursuant to the International Money Express, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4(f) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
10.7**†
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the International Money Express, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4(b) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
10.8**†
Form of Incentive Stock Option Award pursuant to the International Money Express, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4(a) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
10.9**†
Form of Restricted Stock Award (Executive Officer) pursuant to the International Money Express, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4(e) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
10.10**†
Form of Restricted Stock Award (Director) pursuant to the International Money Express, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4(d) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
10.11**†
Form of Restricted Stock Award (Non-executive) pursuant to the International Money Express, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4(c) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
10.12**†
Form of Director RSU Agreement pursuant to the International Money Express, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3(b) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
10.13**†
International Money Express, Inc. 2020 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2020).
10.14**†
International Money Express, Inc. 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex B to the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2020).
10.15**†
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the International Money Express, Inc. 2020 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 6, 2020).
10.16**†
Form of RSU Agreement (Non-Employee Directors) pursuant to the International Money Express, Inc. 2020 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 6, 2020).
10.17*†
Form of RSU Agreement (Employees) pursuant to the International Money Express, Inc. 2020 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan.
10.18*†
Form of PSU Agreement (Employees) pursuant to the International Money Express, Inc. 2020 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan.
10.19*†
Form of PSU Agreement (Robert Lisy) pursuant to the International Money Express, Inc. 2020 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan.
10.20*†
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Robert Lisy) pursuant to the International Money Express, Inc. 2020 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan.
10.21**†
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Robert Lisy and Intermex Holdings, II, Inc. and certain stockholders, dated as of FinTech Acquisition Corp. II(3)
14.1Code of Business Conduct and Ethics(2)
21.1*Subsidiaries ofJanuary 5, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant
31.1*Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
31.2*Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
32.1*Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. 1350
32.2*Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. 1350
101.INS*XBRL Instance Document
101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*  Filed herewith

(1)Previously filed as an exhibit to ourRegistrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25, 20176, 2021).
(2)Previously filed as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-215305)
(3)
10.22**†
Previously filedEmployment Agreement by and between Andras Bende and the Company, dated as an exhibitof December 7, 2021 (incorporated by reference to ourExhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 20,8, 2020).
10.23**†
Employment Agreement by and between Randy Nilsen and Intermex Holdings, Inc. dated as of February 1, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5(e) to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).

Item 16.FORM
10.24**†
Employment Agreement dated September 23, 2019, between Joseph Aguilar and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed On October 3, 2019).
10.25**†
Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on September 28, 2018 (File No. 333-226948)).
Subsidiaries of the registrant
Consent of BDO USA, LLP.
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002- Chief Executive Officer
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002- Chief Financial Officer
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101*The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K SUMMARY.for the year ended December 31, 2020, are formatted in iXBRL (Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Audited Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Audited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income, (iii) the Audited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Audited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Not applicable. 

59
104*The cover page from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, formatted in iXBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.


Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
*Filed herewith.
**Previously filed.
#    Furnished herewith.

79

ITEM 16.    FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
80

SIGNATURES

In accordance with

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrantRegistrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

FINTECH ACQUISITION CORP. II
International Money Express, Inc. (Registrant)
Dated:
March 15, 20182021By:
/s/ Daniel G. CohenRobert Lisy

Daniel G. Cohen

Robert Lisy
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: March 15, 2018/s/ James J. McEntee, III

James J. McEntee, III

President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

President

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Reportreport has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

NamePositionDate
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Daniel G. CohenRobert LisyChief Executive Officer, President and DirectorChairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer)March 15, 20182021
Daniel G. CohenRobert Lisy(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ James J. McEntee, IIIAndras BendePresident and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 15, 2018
James J. McEntee, III(Principal (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)March 15, 2021
Andras Bende
/s/ Adam GodfreyDirectorMarch 15, 2021
Adam Godfrey
/s/ Kurt HolsteinDirectorMarch 15, 2021
Kurt Holstein
/s/ Christopher LofgrenDirectorMarch 15, 2021
Christopher Lofgren
/s/ Betsy Z. CohenLaura MaydónChairman of the BoardDirectorMarch 15, 20182021
Betsy Z. CohenLaura Maydón
/s/ Walter T. BeachMichael PurcellLead DirectorMarch 15, 20182021
Walter T. BeachMichael Purcell
/s/ Jeremy KuiperJohn RinconDirectorMarch 15, 20182021
Jeremy KuiperJohn Rincon
/s/ Shami PatelJustin WenderDirectorMarch 15, 20182021
Shami PatelJustin Wender

60


81