UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20212023

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _____to _____

Commission File Number: 001-40743 

 

Commission File Number: 001-40743 

CENAQ Energy Corp.

Verde Clean Fuels, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware85-1863331

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

 

4550 Post Oak Place Dr.,
711 Louisiana St, Suite 300, 2160
Houston, Texas
7702777002
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713) 820-6300(469) 398-2200

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Units, each consisting of one share of Class A common stock and three-quarters of one warrantCENQUThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Class A common stock,Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per shareCENQVGASThe NASDAQ StockNasdaq Capital Market LLC
Warrants, each whole warrant exercisable for one share of Class A common stockCommon Stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per shareCENQWVGASWThe NASDAQ StockNasdaq Capital Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

None.

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

 

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No

 

As of June 30, 2021, which was2023, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the registrant’s securities were not publicly traded. The registrant’s units began tradingaggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock outstanding held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $55.9 million (based on the closing sales price of the Class A common stock on June 30, 2023 of $6.51 per share as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market on August 13, 2021, and the registrant’s Class A common stock public shares and public warrants commenced separate public trading on the NASDAQ Stock Market on October 4, 2021.Market).

 

There were 17,439,7509,428,797 Class A common stock shares and 4,312,50022,500,000 Class BC common stock shares of the registrant outstanding on March 29, 2022.28, 2024.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

None.Certain sections of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) within 120 days of the Registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”).

 

 

CENAQ Energy Corp.Verde Clean Fuels, Inc.

FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20212023

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
PART I1
ITEM 1.Business1
ITEM 1A.Risk Factors1913
ITEM 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments5644
ITEM 1C.Cybersecurity44
ITEM 2.Properties5645
ITEM 3.Legal Proceedings5645
ITEM 4.Mine Safety Disclosures5645
PART II5746
ITEM 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities5746
ITEM 6.[Reserved]5846
ITEM 7.Management’s Discussion andAnd Analysis ofOf Financial Condition andAnd Results ofOf Operations5846
ITEM 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Aboutabout Market Risk6254
ITEM 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary DataF-154
ITEM 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure6355
ITEM 9A.Controls and ProcedureProcedures6355
ITEM 9B.Other Information6356
ITEM 9C.Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions thatThat Prevent Inspections.Inspections6356
PART III6457
ITEM 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance6457
ITEM 11.Executive Compensation7357
ITEM 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters7357
ITEM 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence7557
ITEM 14.14.Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services7857
PART IV7958
ITEM 15.15.Exhibits and Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules7958
ITEM 16.Form 10-K Summary8059

i

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report, on Form 10-K (“Report”), including, without limitation, statements under the section entitledheadings “Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” containsincludes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, regarding future events1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”) and the future resultsSection 21E of the Company thatSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). Verde Clean Fuels Inc’s (“the Company”) forward-looking statements include, but are based on currentnot limited to, statements regarding the Company’s or the Company’s management team’s expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections abouthopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the industry in which the Company operates and the beliefs and assumptions of the management of the Company.

future. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-lookingThese forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, conditions or results, and involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other important factors, many of which are outside the control of the Company, that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Important factors, among others, that may include, for example, statements about the following, among other factors:affect actual results or outcomes include:

our ability to select an appropriate targetthe financial and business or businesses;performance of the Company;

ourthe ability to complete our initial business combination;maintain the listing of the Class A Common Stock and the Verde Clean Fuels warrants on Nasdaq, and the potential liquidity and trading of such securities;

our

the failure to realize the anticipated benefits of the business combination that the Company consummated on February 15, 2023 (the “Business Combination”), which may be affected by, among other things, competition;

the Company’s ability to consummate an initial business combination duedevelop and operate anticipated and new projects;

the Company’s ability to obtain financing for future projects;

the reduction or elimination of government economic incentives to the renewable energy market;

delays in acquisition, financing, construction and development of new projects;

the length of development cycles for new projects, including the design and construction processes for the Company’s projects;

the Company’s ability to identify suitable locations for new projects;

the Company’s dependence on suppliers;

ii

existing laws and regulations and changes to laws, regulations and policies that affect the Company’s operations;

decline in public acceptance and support of renewable energy development and projects;

demand for renewable energy not being sustained;

impacts of climate change, changing weather patterns and conditions, and natural disasters;

the ability to secure necessary governmental and regulatory approvals;

The ability to qualify for federal or state level low-carbon fuel credits or other carbon credits;

any decline in the value of federal or state level low-carbon fuel credits or other carbon credits and the development of the carbon credit markets;

risks relating to the Company’s status as a development stage company with a history of net losses and no revenue;

risks relating to the uncertainty resulting fromof success or delays of the recent COVID-19 pandemic;Company’s research and development efforts;

our expectations arounddisruptions in the performancesupply chain, fluctuation in price of product inputs, and market conditions and global and economic factors beyond the prospective target business or businesses;Company’s control;

ourthe Company’s success in retaining or recruiting, or changes required in, ourits officers, key employees or directors following our initial business combination;directors;

our officers and directors allocating their timethe ability of the Company to other businesses and potentially having conflictsexecute its business model, including market acceptance of interest with our business or in approving our initial business combination, as a result of which they would then receive expense reimbursements;gasoline derived from renewable feedstocks;

our potentiallitigation and the ability to obtain additional financing to complete our initial business combination;adequately protect intellectual property rights;

our pool of prospective target businesses;competition from companies with greater resources and financial strength in the industries in which the Company operates;

the abilityeffect of our officerslegal, tax and directors to generate a number of potential acquisition opportunities;regulatory changes; and

our public securities’ potential liquidity and trading;other factors detailed under the section titled “Risk Factors.”

the lack of a market for our securities;

the use of proceeds not held in the trust account or available to us from interest income on the trust account balance;

the trust account not being subject to claims of third parties; or

our financial performance.

We disclose important factorsThe forward-looking statements contained in this Report are based on the Company’s current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on the Company. There can be no assurance that couldfuture developments affecting the Company will be those that the Company has anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (many of which are beyond the Company’s control) or other assumptions that may cause our actual results or performance to differbe materially different from our expectationsthose expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those factors described or incorporated by reference under the heading “Risk Factors” below. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of the assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. There may be additional risks that the Company considers immaterial or which are unknown. It is not possible to predict or identify all such risks. The Company will not and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Report. These cautionary statements qualify all forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf. We dodoes not undertake any obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by law, including theunder applicable securities laws of the United States and the rules and regulations of the SEC.laws.

ii

Unless otherwise stated in this Annual Report, or the context otherwise requires, references to “we,” “us,” “Company” or “our company” are to CENAQ Energy Corp., and references to:

“anchor investors” are 11 qualified institutional buyers or institutional accredited investors which are not affiliated with us, our sponsor, our directors or any member of our management and that have each purchased up to 1,485,000 units in the IPO and have each agreed to purchase from our sponsor 75,000 founder shares, or an aggregate of 825,000 founder shares, at their original purchase price of approximately $0.0058 per share, subject to each anchor investor purchasing 100% of the units allocated to it, as further described herein;

“Board” refer to our board of directors;

“common stock” are to our Class A common stock and our Class B common stock, collectively;

“equity-linked securities” are to any securities of our company which are convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for, common stock of our company;

“founder shares” are to shares of our Class B common stock initially purchased by our sponsor in a private placement before the IPO, and the shares of our Class A common stock issued upon the conversion thereof as provided herein;

“initial stockholders” are to our sponsor and any other holders of our founder shares before the IPO (if any) (other than the anchor investors);

“IPO” are to our initial public offering in August 2021;

“management” or our “management team” are to our officers;

“private placement warrants” are to the warrants to be issued to our sponsor and underwriters in private placements that closed simultaneously with the closing of the IPO;

“public shares” are to shares of our Class A common stock sold as part of the units in the IPO (whether they were purchased in the IPO or thereafter in the open market);

“public stockholders” are to the holders of our public shares, including our initial stockholders and members of our management team and Board to the extent any of them purchases public shares, provided that each such initial stockholder’s and individual’s status as a “public stockholder” shall only exist with respect to such public shares;

“public warrants” are to our warrants sold as part of the units in the IPO (whether they were purchased in the IPO or thereafter in the open market) and to any private placement warrants or warrants issued upon conversion of working capital loans that are sold to third parties that are not initial purchasers or officers or directors (or permitted transferees) following the consummation of our initial business combination;

“representative shares” are to the 189,750 shares of Class A Common Stock issued as compensation to the representative and/or its designees;

“specified future issuance” are to an issuance of a class of equity or equity-linked securities to specified purchasers that we may determine in connection with financing our initial business combination;

“sponsor” are to CENAQ Sponsor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, in which certain of our officers and directors is or will be, directly or indirectly, a member;

“warrants” are to our warrants, which include the public warrants as well as the private placement warrants (which are identical); and

“working capital loans” are to loans that are made to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended business combination.

iii

SUMMARY OF SELECTED RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR BUSINESS

Our business faces significant risks and uncertainties. If any of the following risks are realized, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. You should carefully review and consider the full discussion of our risk factors in the section titled “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Report. Some of the more significant risks include the following:

Our commercial success depends on our ability to develop and operate production facilities for the commercial production of renewable gasoline;

Our limited history, lack of revenue and limited liquidity makes it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects and may increase the risks associated with your investment;

We may be unable to qualify for existing federal or state level low-carbon fuel credits or other carbon credits and the carbon credit markets may not develop as quickly or efficiently as we anticipate or at all;

Significant capital investment is required to develop and conduct our operations and we intend to raise additional funds through debt financing for our planned operations and these funds may not be available when needed;

In order to construct new commercial production facilities, we typically face a long and variable design, fabrication, and construction development cycle that requires significant resource commitments and may create fluctuations in whether and when revenue is recognized, and may have an adverse effect on our business;

We have entered into relatively new markets for renewables, including renewable natural gas, renewable gasoline and biofuel and these new markets are highly volatile and have significant risk associated with current market conditions;

Fluctuations in the price of product inputs, including renewable feedstocks, natural gas and other feedstocks, may affect our cost structure;

Fluctuations in petroleum prices and customer demand patterns may reduce demand for renewable fuels and bio-based chemicals and a prolonged environment of low petroleum prices or reduced demand for renewable fuels or biofuels could have a material adverse effect on our long-term business prospects, financial condition and results of operations;

We may face substantial competition from companies with greater resources and financial strength, which could affect our performance and growth;

Our proposed growth projects may not be completed or, if completed, may not perform as expected and our project development activities may consume a significant portion of our management’s focus, and if not successful, reduce our profitability;

We may not be able to develop, maintain and grow strategic relationships, identify new strategic relationship opportunities, or form strategic relationships, in the future;

Fluctuations in the price and availability of energy to power our facilities may harm out performance;

We may be subject to liabilities and losses that may not be covered by insurance;

Renewable gasoline has not previously been used as a commercial fuel in significant amounts, its use subjects us to product liability risks and we may become subject to product liability claims, which could harm our financial condition and liquidity if we are not able to successfully defend or insure against such claims;

Failure of third parties to manufacture quality products or provide reliable services in accordance with schedules, prices, quality and volumes that are acceptable to us could cause delays in developing and operating our commercial production facilities, which could damage our reputation, adversely affect our partner relationships or adversely affect our growth;

iv

We may be unable to successfully perform under future supply and distribution agreements to provide our renewable gasoline, which could harm our commercial prospects;

Third parties on whom we may rely for transportation services are subject to complex federal, state and other laws that could adversely affect our operations;

Our facilities and processes may fail to produce renewable gasoline at the volumes, rates and costs we expect;

Even if we are successful in completing the first commercial production facility and consistently producing renewable gasoline on a commercial scale, we may not be successful in commencing and expanding commercial operations to support the growth of our business;

We are a development stage company with a history of net losses, we are currently not profitable and we may not achieve or maintain profitability, and if we incur substantial losses, we may have to curtail our operations, which may prevent us from successfully operating and expanding our business;

Our actual costs may be greater than expected in developing our commercial production facilities or growth projects, causing us to realize significantly lower profits or greater losses;

Disruption in the supply chain, including increases in costs, shortage of materials or other disruption of supply, or in the workforce could materially adversely affect our business;

Our business and prospects depend significantly on our ability to build our brand and we may not succeed in continuing to establish, maintain, and strengthen our brand, and our brand and reputation could be harmed by negative publicity regarding our company or products;

Our industry and our technologies are rapidly evolving and may be subject to unforeseen changes and developments in alternative technologies may adversely affect the demand for renewable gasoline, and if we fail to make the right investment decisions in our technologies and products, we may be at a competitive disadvantage;

The Company previously identified material weaknesses in its internal controls over financial reporting that have been remediated, and if we are unable to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and materially and adversely affect our business and operating results, and we may face litigation as a result;

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of Nasdaq Capital Market rules and, as a result, qualify for exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements, and as a result, you do not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are not exempt from such corporate governance requirements; and

We are a holding company and our only material asset is our equity interest in OpCo, and we will accordingly be dependent upon distributions from OpCo to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement (as defined herein) and cover its corporate and other overhead expenses.

v

PART I

ITEM 1. Business.

IntroductionOverview

Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “Verde,” “Verde Clean Fuels” and “Company”) is a development-stage clean energy technology company specializing in the conversion of synthesis gas, or syngas, derived from diverse feedstocks, such as biomass or natural gas (including renewable natural gas) and other feedstocks, into liquid hydrocarbons, primarily gasoline, through an innovative and proprietary liquid fuels technology, the STG+® process. Through Verde Clean Fuels’ STG+® process, Verde Clean Fuels converts syngas into reformulated blend-stock for oxygenate blending (“RBOB”) gasoline. Verde Clean Fuels is focused on the development of technology and commercial facilities aimed at turning waste and other feedstocks into a usable stream of syngas which is then transformed into a single finished fuel, such as gasoline, without any additional refining steps. The availability of biogenic feedstocks and the economic and environmental drivers that divert these materials from landfills will enable us to utilize these waste streams to produce renewable gasoline from modular production facilities.

We are redefining liquid fuels technology through our proprietary and innovative STG+® process to deliver scalable and cost-effective gasoline from renewable feedstocks or flared natural gas. We acquired our STG+® technology from Primus Green Energy (“Primus”), a company established in 2007 that developed the patented STG+® technology to convert syngas into gasoline or methanol. Since acquiring the technology, we have adapted the application of our STG+® technology to focus on the renewable energy industry. This information includedadaptation requires a third-party gasification system to produce acceptable synthesis gas from renewable feedstocks. Our proprietary STG+® system converts the syngas into gasoline.

Over $110 million has been invested in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be readour technology, including our demonstration facility in conjunctionNew Jersey, which has completed over 10,500 hours of operation producing gasoline or methanol. Our demonstration facility represents the scalable nature of our operational modular commercial design which has fully integrated reactors and recycle lines and is designed with key variables, like gas velocity and catalyst bed length, at a 1-to-1 scale with our commercial design. We have also participated in carbon lifecycle studies to validate the scoring of carbon intensity, which we define as the quantity of greenhouse gas emissions associated with producing, distributing, and consuming a fuel, per unit of fuel energy (“CI”) and reduced lifecycle emissions (the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the consolidated financial statementsproduction, distribution, and related notes following Item 16consumption of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Please see the definitions above for a list of terms used throughout this Report.

Somefuel) of our logos, trademarks or tradenamesrenewable gasoline as well as fuel, blending and engine testing to validate the specification and performance of our gasoline product. Our carbon intensity score is based on an analysis styled after the Department of Energy’s Greenhouse gases Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies (“GREET”) life cycle analysis. We believe our renewable gasoline, when paired with carbon capture and sequestration, exhibits a significant lifecycle carbon emissions reduction compared to traditional petroleum-based gasoline. As a result, we believe our gasoline produced from renewable feedstock, such as biomass, will qualify under the federal renewable fuel standard (“RFS”) program for the D3 renewable identification number (“RIN”), which could have significant value. Similarly, gasoline produced from our process may also qualify for various state carbon programs, including California’s low carbon fuel standard (“LCFS”). Unlike many other gas-to-liquids technologies, not only can our STG+® process produce renewable gasoline from syngas, but we expect it will be used in this Report. This Report also includes trademarks, tradenames and service marks that are the property of others. Solely for convenience, trademarks, tradenames and service marks referredable to in this Report may appear without the®, ™ and SM symbols. Referencesbe applied at other production facilities to produce other end products including methanol. In addition to our trademarks, tradenamesinitial focus on the production of renewable gasoline, we believe that there is opportunity to continue to develop additional process technology to produce middle distillates including lower-carbon diesel and service marks are not intended to indicate in any way that we will not assert toaviation fuel. As with other government programs, the fullest extent under applicable law our rights or the rightsuse requirements of the applicable licensors if any, nor that respective owners toRFS program and other intellectual property rights will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, their rights thereto. We do not intend the use or display of other companies’ trademarks and trade names to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, any other companies.

The market data and certain other statistical information used throughout this Report are based on independent industry publications, reports by market research firms or other independent sources that we believe to be reliable sources. Industry publications and third-party research, surveys and studies generally indicate that their information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, although they do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information. We are responsible for all of the disclosures contained in this Report, and we believe these industry publications and third-party research, surveys and studies are reliable. While we are not aware of any misstatements regarding any third-party information presented in this Report, their estimates, in particular, as they relate to projections, involve numerous assumptions, are subject to risks and uncertainties, andsimilar state-level programs are subject to change, basedwhich could materially harm our ability to operate profitably. As of December 31, 2023, the Company is still in the process of developing its first commercial production facility and has not derived revenue from its principal business activities. The Company is managed as an integrated business and consequently, there is only one reportable segment.

“Clean” or “lower-carbon” as used in relation to the Company’s products refers the lower CI, lower lifecycle emissions, and lower quantity of greenhouse gas emissions resulting directly from fuel combustion, relative to conventional gasoline derived from petroleum. “Renewable” as used in relation to the Company’s products refers to energy or fuel derived from biomass feedstock.


Our Growth Strategy

We intend to grow our business by leveraging our competitive advantages in the design and implementation of small-scale modular facilities that can be situated in proximity to renewable feedstock or natural gas sources. We believe we have a number of avenues to achieve our growth objectives:

Construction and Development of Commercial Production Facilities

A critical step in our success will be the successful construction and operation of the first commercial production facility using our STG+® technology. In April 2022, we commenced a pre-front-end engineering and design (“FEED”) study for our first commercial production facility in Maricopa, Arizona. While we have not abandoned a potential project in Maricopa, Arizona, we have refocused on various factors,projects that we believe have quicker paths to commercial operations. We believe our commercialization activities are being completed at a pace that can support first commercial production of renewable gasoline as early as 2026.

Concurrent with the Business Combination, Diamondback Energy, Inc (“Diamondback”) through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Cottonmouth Ventures LLC (“Cottonmouth Ventures”), made a $20 million equity investment in Verde and entered into an equity participation right agreement pursuant to which Verde must grant Cottonmouth Ventures the right to participate and jointly develop facilities in the Permian Basin utilizing Verde’s STG+® technology for the production of gasoline derived from economically disadvantaged natural gas feedstocks. Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas company headquartered in Midland, Texas, focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas. The production of gasoline from natural gas sourced from the Permian Basin is designed to allow Diamondback to mitigate the flaring of natural gas while also producing a high-margin product from natural gas streams that are subject to being price disadvantaged compared to other natural gas basins.

On February 6, 2024, Verde and Cottonmouth Ventures entered into a joint development agreement (“JDA”) for the proposed development, construction, and operation of a facility to produce commodity-grade gasoline using natural gas feedstock supplied from Diamondback’s operations in the Permian Basin. The JDA provides a pathway forward for the parties to reach final definitive documents and final investment decision (“FID”). The JDA frames the contracts contemplated to be entered into between the parties, including those discussed under the section entitled “Risk Factors” of this Report. Thesean operating agreement, ground lease agreement, construction agreement, license agreement and other factors could cause our future performance to differ materially from our assumptions and estimates. Some market and other data included herein,financing agreements as well as conditions precedent to close such as FID. We expect that the dataproposed facility, which is to be located in Martin County, Texas in the heart of competitorsthe Permian Basin, could serve as they relatea template for additional natural gas-to-gasoline projects throughout the Permian Basin and other pipeline-constrained basins in the U.S., as well as addressing flared or stranded natural gas opportunities internationally.

We plan to grow our business by building and operating a portfolio of commercial production facilities. Currently, we have three additional production facilities planned with additional potential production facility development opportunities in early-stage due diligence. We have identified opportunities to produce gasoline from natural gas in other pipeline-constrained production areas as well as opportunities to produce renewable gasoline from biomass in locations with access to suitable feedstock, carbon sequestration, and markets. We believe the number of identified and planned potential production facilities bode well for our potential growth.

On August 1, 2023, we announced a carbon dioxide management agreement (“CDMA”) with Carbon TerraVault JV HoldCo, LLC (“CTV JV”), a carbon management partnership focused on carbon capture and sequestration development formed between Carbon TerraVault, a subsidiary of California Resources Corporation (“CRC”), and Brookfield Renewable. Under the terms of the non-binding agreement, the Company would construct a new renewable gasoline production facility at CRC’s existing Net Zero Industrial Park in Kern County, California, to capture carbon dioxide and produce renewable gasoline from biomass and other agricultural waste feedstock to help support the further decarbonization of California’s economy and its transportation sector. It is anticipated that the project could produce up to 7 million gallons per year of renewable gasoline for use as transportation fuel. Project FID is targeted for mid-2025, with operations expected to begin in the second half of 2027.

Expansion of Commercial Operations and Customer Base

We believe there are growth opportunities utilizing our technology for the production of gasoline derived from existing locations with economically disadvantaged natural gas, flared natural gas and stranded natural gas feedstocks. We also plan to achieve growth through the expansion of our in-process projects as the facilities are expanded or otherwise begin to produce renewable gasoline. We also intend to license our technology in places where we do not anticipate deploying our own capital. Additionally, we intend to expand internationally to regions interested in our STG+® process, like the European Union and United Kingdom, and may enter relationships with other businesses to expand our operations and to create service networks to support our production and delivery of renewable gasoline.


Establishing and Maintaining Relationships with Key Strategic Partners

We have established, maintained and managed strategic relationships with certain key strategic partners, including Cottonmouth Ventures, CarbonTerraVault, California Resources Corporation, and InEnTec Inc., who have the resources to promote mutually beneficial business relationships and grow our business. To expand our business, we plan to continue to identify and evaluate development and partnership opportunities and other suitable and scalable business relationships.

Other Important Relationships

We are in the process of selecting the contractor for the FEED work for our Permian Basin project. The selected contractor is also expected to perform engineering, procurement, and construction (“EPC”) services once the project has achieved FID. The selected contractor will be an important strategic relationship for Verde to support the strategy of engineering a system once and building many with minimal changes.

Koch Modular Process Systems, LLC (“KMPS”) is an important EPC subcontractor and provides technical information to IHI and/or its subcontractors for FEED execution.

Developing and Advancing Technology

Just as we refocused the use and application of our STG+® technology from using natural gas as a feedstock to using renewable biomass and other feedstocks, our research and development (“R&D”) team is continuously researching and developing ways to improve our technology and meet our customers’ energy needs. Using our innovative technology platform and intellectual property portfolio, we are well-positioned to continue making technology advancements over time. Additionally, we intend to develop or acquire additional intellectual property, such as processes for lower-carbon diesel and aviation fuel, as well as other complementary technologies.

Formation, Business Combination and Related Transactions

On February 15, 2023 (the “Closing Date”), we consummated (“Closing”) the Business Combination pursuant to that certain business combination agreement, dated as of August 12, 2022 (“Business Combination Agreement”) by and among CENAQ Energy Corp. (“CENAQ”), a Delaware Corporation, Verde Clean Fuels OpCo, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of CENAQ (“OpCo”), Bluescape Clean Fuels Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Holdings”), Bluescape Clean Fuels Intermediate Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings (“Intermediate”), and CENAQ Sponsor LLC (“Sponsor”). Immediately upon the completion of the Business Combination, CENAQ was renamed Verde Clean Fuels, Inc.

Pursuant to the Company is also based on our good faith estimates.Business Combination Agreement: (i) CENAQ filed a fourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the “Fourth A&R Charter”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware reflecting the name change to “Verde Clean Fuels, Inc.” and increasing the number of authorized shares of Verde Clean Fuels’ capital stock, par value $0.0001 per share, to 376,000,000 shares, consisting of (A) 350,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Class A Common Stock”), (B) 25,000,000 shares of Class C common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Class C Common Stock” and, together with the Class A Common Stock, the “Common Stock”), and (C) 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share; (ii) (A) CENAQ contributed to OpCo (1) all of its assets (excluding its interests in OpCo and the aggregate amount of cash required to satisfy any exercise by CENAQ stockholders of their Redemption Rights (as defined below)) and (2) 22,500,000 newly issued shares of Class C Common Stock (such shares, the “Holdings Class C Shares”) and (B) in exchange therefor, OpCo issued to CENAQ a number of Class A common units of OpCo (the “Class A OpCo Units”) equal to the number of total shares of Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately after the consummation of the transactions (the “Transactions”) contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement (such transactions, the “SPAC Contribution”); and (iii) immediately following the SPAC Contribution, (A) Holdings contributed to OpCo 100% of the issued and outstanding limited liability company interests of Intermediate and (B) in exchange therefor, OpCo transferred to Holdings (1) 22,500,000 Class C common units of OpCo (the “Class C OpCo Units” and, together with the Class A OpCo Units, the “OpCo Units”) and (2) the Holdings Class C Shares. Additionally, the following transactions occurred in connection with the Business Combination:

The issuance and sale of 3,200,000 shares of Class A Common Stock for a purchase price of $10.00 per share (Holdings purchased 800,000 of these shares of Class A Common Stock), for an aggregate purchase price of $32,000,000, in a private placement (“PIPE Financing”);

An aggregate of $158.8 million was paid from the CENAQ trust account to holders of 15,403,880 shares of Class A Common Stock that exercised their redemption rights (“Redemption Rights”) and the balance of $19,031,516 of proceeds from CENAQ’s trust account related to non-redeeming holders of 1,846,120 shares of Class A Common Stock were released from trust and delivered to Verde Clean Fuels as part of the Business Combination;

Organizational History and Business


We repaid $3,750,000 of capital contributions made by Holdings and paid $10,043,793 of transaction expenses including deferred underwriting fees of $1,700,000;

Holdings received earnout consideration (“Holdings earnout”) of 3,500,000 shares of Class C common stock and a corresponding number of Class C OpCo Units subject to vesting that will result in the issuance as follows: (i) one-half of the Holdings earnout shares will vest when the volume-weighted average share price (“VWAP”) of the Class A Common Stock is greater than or equal to $15.00 for any 20 trading days within any period of 30 consecutive trading days within five years of the Closing Date and (ii) the second half will vest when the VWAP of the Class A Common Stock is greater than or equal to $18.00 over the same measurement period (vesting will be deemed to occur in the event of a sale of Verde Clean Fuels at a price that is equal to or greater than the applicable triggering VWAP price);

The Sponsor received earnout consideration (“Sponsor earnout”) of 3,234,375 shares of Class A Common Stock subject to forfeiture which will no longer be subject to forfeiture as follows: (i) one-half of the Sponsor earnout will no longer be subject to forfeiture if the VWAP of Class A Common Stock is greater than or equal to $15.00 for any 20 trading days within any period of 30 consecutive trading days within five years of the Closing Date and (ii) the second half will no longer be subject to forfeiture when the VWAP of the Class A Common Stock is greater than or equal to $18.00 over the same measurement period (forfeiture to be deemed of no further force and effect in the event of a sale of Verde Clean Fuels at a price that is equal to or greater than the applicable triggering VWAP price);

The forfeiture by underwriters of 189,750 shares of Class A Common Stock; and

The issuance of 253,125 and 825,000 shares of Class A Common Stock to the Sponsor and certain other investors in CENAQ’s initial public offering upon conversion of Class B common stock of CENAQ.

Total proceeds raised from the Business Combination were $37,329,178 consisting of $32,000,000 in PIPE Financing proceeds, $19,031,516 from the CENAQ trust, and $91,454 from the CENAQ operating account offset by $10,043,793 in transaction expenses which were recorded as a reduction to additional paid in capital, and offset by a $3,750,000 capital repayment to Holdings. As of the consummation of the Business Combination, there were (i) 31,858,620 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding, comprised of 9,358,620 shares of Class A Common Stock and 22,500,000 shares of Class C common stock and (ii) 2,475,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of 2,475,000 private placement warrants originally issued by CENAQ (“Private Placement Warrants”) and 12,937,479 shares of our Class A Common Stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of our 12,937,479 public warrants issued in the CENAQ initial public offering (“Public Warrants” and, together with the Private Placement Warrants, the “Warrants”). Each of the Warrants is currently exercisable to purchase one share of Class A Common Stock at $11.50 per share on or prior to February 15, 2028, except for 29,216 Public Warrants that were exercised for cash of $335,984 in connection with the issuance of 29,216 shares of Class A Common Stock during fiscal 2023.

We are

Prior to the Business Combination, Verde Clean Fuels, previously CENAQ, was a newly organized blank checkspecial purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”) incorporated as a Delaware corporation and formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stockshare exchange, asset acquisition, stockshare purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses, which we referbusinesses.

Pursuant to throughout this Annual ReportASC 805 – Business Combinations (“ASC 805”), the Business Combination was accounted for as our initial business combination. We have had discussionsa common control reverse recapitalization where Intermediate was deemed the accounting acquirer and Verde Clean Fuels was treated as the accounting acquiree, with potential business combination targetsno goodwill or other intangible assets recorded, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the energy sector, including energy transitionUnited States of America (“GAAP”). The Business Combination was not treated as a change in control of Intermediate. This determination reflects Holdings holding a majority of the voting power of Verde Clean Fuels, Intermediate’s pre-Business Combination operations being the majority post-Business Combination operations of Verde Clean Fuels, and renewable fuels industries.Intermediate’s management team retaining similar roles at Verde Clean Fuels. Further, Holdings continues to have control of the Board of Directors through its majority voting rights. Under ASC 805, the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of Intermediate are recognized at their carrying amounts on the date of the Business Combination.

Initial Public Offering

The registration statement for our IPO was declared effective on August 12, 2021. On August 17, 2021, we consummated our IPO of 15,000,000 units. Each unit consists of one Class A common stock of the Company, par value $0.0001 per share, and three-quarters of one redeemable warrant of the Company, each whole Warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one Class A common stock for $11.50 per share. The units were sold at a price of $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds to the Company of $150,000,000.

Certain qualified institutional buyers or institutional accredited investors which are not affiliated with any member of the Company’s management have purchased up to 1,485,000 units in the IPO at the offering price of $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds of $14,850,000 included in the gross proceeds from units offered to public of $150,000,000.


 

In connection with the closing of the IPO, the Sponsor sold membership interest reflecting an allocation of 75,000 founder shares, or an aggregate of 825,000 founder shares, to each anchor investor at their original purchase price of approximately $0.0058 per share.

Substantially with the closing of the IPO, the Company completed the private sale of an aggregate of 6,000,000 warrants to the Sponsor and the Underwriters at a purchase price of $1.00 per Private Placement Warrant, generating gross proceeds to the Company of $6,000,000. The Private Placement Warrants are identical to the Warrants sold in the IPO, except that the Sponsor and the Underwriters agreed not to transfer, assign or sell any of the Private Placement Warrants (except to certain permitted transferees) until 30 days afterFollowing the completion of the Company’s initial Business Combination.

Combination, the combined company is organized in an “Up-C” structure and the only direct assets of Verde Clean Fuels consists of equity interests in OpCo, whose only direct assets consists of equity interests in Intermediate. The underwriters hadup-C structure allows Holdings to retain its equity ownership through Opco, an entity that is classified as a 45-day option frompartnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, in the dateform of Class C Opco Units, and provides potential future tax benefits for Verde Clean Fuels when the holders of Class C Opco Units ultimately exchange their Class C Opco Units and shares of the Company’s IPOClass C Common Stock for shares of Class A Common Stock in Verde Clean Fuels. We are the sole managing member of Opco. As such, we consolidate Opco, and the unitholders that hold economic interests directly in Opco are presented as redeemable noncontrolling interests in our financial statements.

Holders of Class C Opco Units, other than Verde Clean Fuels, have the right (a “redemption right”), subject to purchase upcertain limitations, to exchange all or a portion of its Class C Opco Units and a corresponding number of shares of Class C Common Stock for, at Opco’s election, (i) shares of Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like, or (ii) an additional 2,250,000 Units to cover over-allotments, if any. equivalent amount of cash.

On August 19, 2021, the underwriters exercised the over-allotmentClosing Date, in full, at $10.00 per Unit, generating additional gross proceeds of $22,500,000. Simultaneouslyconnection with the closingconsummation of the over-allotment,Business Combination, Verde Clean Fuels entered into a tax receivable agreement (the “Tax Receivable Agreement”) with Holdings (together with its permitted transferees, the Company consummated the sale of additional 450,000 Private Placement Warrants“TRA Holders,” and each a “TRA Holder”). Pursuant to the Sponsor,Tax Receivable Agreement, Verde Clean Fuels is required to pay each TRA Holder 85% of the amount of net cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income and franchise tax that Verde Clean Fuels actually realizes (computed using certain simplifying assumptions) or is deemed to realize in certain circumstances in periods after the Closing Date as a result of, as applicable to each such TRA Holder, (i) certain increases in tax basis that occur as a result of Verde Clean Fuels’ acquisition (or deemed acquisition for U.S. federal income tax purposes) of all or a portion of such TRA Holder’s Class C OpCo Units pursuant to the exercise of the OpCo exchange right, a mandatory exchange or the call right (collectively referred to as “Exchange Right, a Mandatory Exchange or the Call Right”) and (ii) imputed interest deemed to be paid by Verde Clean Fuels as a result of, and additional 225,000 Private Placement Warrantstax basis arising from, any payments Verde Clean Fuels makes under the Tax Receivable Agreement. Verde Clean Fuels will retain the benefit of the remaining 15% of these net cash savings. The Tax Receivable Agreement contains a payment cap of $50,000,000, which applies only to certain payments required to be made in connection with the occurrence of a change of control. The payment cap would not be reduced or offset by any amounts previously paid under the Tax Receivable Agreement or any amounts that are required to be paid (but have not yet been paid) for the year in which the change of control occurs or any prior years.

Our Facilities

We own a demonstration facility in Hillsborough, New Jersey and lease office space in Hillsborough, New Jersey and Houston, Texas.

Our Intellectual Property and Technology

As of December 31, 2023, Intermediate had been issued 28 patents globally, including 8 patents in the U.S., and had 3 pending patent applications globally. These patents, filed across 14 jurisdictions, including the U.S., protect key aspects of our technology, including the STG+® process, our proprietary method for converting syngas into gasoline. We believe our intellectual property rights are important assets for our success, providing a significant competitive advantage, and we aggressively protect these rights to maintain our competitive advantage in the market. Our U.S. patents expire on dates ranging from 2032 through 2039. We regularly review our development efforts to assess the existence and patentability of new technology and inventions, and we are prepared to file additional patent applications when we determine it would benefit our business to do so.

We own or have adequate rights to use the intellectual property associated with the STG+® technology. Approximately 17 patents or patent applications in our patent portfolio support and protect our ability to produce commodity-grade gasoline from syngas, 14 patents or patent applications relate to the Underwriters,specific fuel composition produced by our proprietary systems and certain claims of our patents relate potential future enhancements to our technology. We manage our patent portfolio to maximize the lifecycle of protecting our intellectual property and various components and aspects of our system are protected by patents that will expire at $1.00 per warrant, generating gross proceeds to the Company of $675,000.staggered times.

Transaction costs of our initial public offering and the over-allotment amounted to $17,771,253 consisting of $3,450,000 of underwriting discount, $6,037,500 of deferred underwriting discount, an excess of fair value of the founder shares acquired by the Anchor Investors of $6,265,215, fair value of the 189,750 representative shares of $1,442,100 and $576,438 of other cash offering costs were charged to additional paid in capital.

A total of $174,225,000 was placed in a U.S.-based trust account maintained by Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, acting as trustee.

Our units, public shares and public warrants are each traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbols “CENQU,” “CENQ” and “CENQW,” respectively.

Business Strategy and Management Team Experience

Our Management Team Experience

Our management team has extensive experience in identifying and executing potential acquisitions across the upstream, downstream and midstream energy sectors. In addition, our team has significant hands-on experience working with oil companies across all sectors and serving as active owners and directors working closely with energy companies to create value in the public markets.

Our acquisition strategy will leverage our management team’s extensive experience and relationships built over more than 170 combined years of forming, financing, and operating public and private oil and gas companies, and the financial and operational expertise of the rest of our team, to identify potential proprietary and public transaction opportunities that we believe could benefit from our knowledge and experience and that offer the potential for an attractive risk-adjusted return profile under our ownership. Our management team has developed a broad network of contacts and corporate relationships over their careers that we believe will serve as a useful source of acquisition opportunities. Our ability to evaluate public/private and brokered/non-brokered deals provides us exposure to a broad set of potential acquisition opportunities in the energy sector that may not broadly available to our potential competitors.

We will seek to capitalize on the extensive experience of each of the members of our management team. The members of our management team, including John B. Connally III, J. Russell Porter and Michael Mayell, each have a history of creating significant value and generating attractive shareholder returns.


 

Our CEO, J. Russell Porter, has sourcedMarket Opportunity

Demand for Renewable Gasoline and financedLower-Carbon Natural Gas

Energy markets are undergoing dramatic changes as they shift from fossil fuels to carbon-reduced and carbon-free sources. A series of technological, economic, regulatory, social and investor pressures are leading the acquisitiondrive to decarbonize energy and sectors that are major energy consumers, such as transportation.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (the “EIA”) “2022 Annual Energy Outlook” and “U.S. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2020,” gasoline accounts for more than 20% of the U.S.’s energy-related carbon dioxide (“CO2”) emissions and overall, transportation represents approximately 37% of total U.S. energy-related CO2 emissions (or 1,903 million tons of CO2). Within the 37% of total U.S. energy-related CO2 emissions caused by the transportation sector, in 2019, gasoline accounted for approximately 56% of the total (or 1,086 million tons of CO2) and accounted for over 150 oiltwice the emissions of diesel (which produced approximately 468 million tons of CO2) and gas producing properties in multiple basins within North America. While Executive Vice Presidentover four times the emissions of Forcenergy Inc., Mr. Porter leadaviation fuel (which produced approximately 261 million tons of CO2). Uptake on competing emissions-reduction technologies, such as electric vehicles, is growing, but, according to BloombergNEF, is only expected to reach 24% of the acquisition team that acquired over 125 separate producing assets in 29 transactions with aggregate net production at the time of acquisition of 18,500 BOPD and 146 MMCFD and proven reserves of 54 million barrels of oil and 273 Bcf of natural gas. When Mr. Porter was CEO of Gastar Exploration, Inc. (“Gastar”), he structured the acquisition of approximately 160,000 acresprojected 2035 total vehicle fleet in the Sooner TrendU.S. As a result, the EIA predicts 2035 gasoline demand to be at 92-102% of Oklahoma from Chesapeake2022 levels. According to the EIA’s “2022 Annual Energy Outlook,” petroleum and natural gas are projected to remain as the most-consumed source of energy in 2013 for $80 millionthe U.S. through 2050, and motor gasoline is projected to be the most commonly used transportation fuel despite electric vehicles gaining market share.

Production of renewable gasoline paired with carbon capture and sequestration results in a negotiated transaction. Shortly after closing, approximately one halffuel that has a negative carbon intensity score, meaning that more carbon is sequestered in the production of a gallon of fuel than is emitted by the consumption of that acreage position was sold to Newfield Exploration for $80 million. Before that, Mr. Porter identified and captured an onshore coal bed methane opportunity in New South Wales, Australia, brought in an Australian operating partner and arranged an exit from the project realizing an approximate 6:1 return on investment.same quantity of fuel.

MembersAccording to the U.S. Department of our management teamEnergy, there are approximately 241 million tons per year of waste forest resources and Board are not obligated318 million tons per year of agricultural waste generated annually in the U.S. Using Verde’s STG+® process to devote any specific numberproduce gasoline from biomass, waste from forest and agricultural sources could produce over 25 billion gallons of hours to our matters, but they intend to devote as muchgasoline per year. Achieving production of their time as they deem necessary to our affairs until we have completed our initial business combination. The amount25 billion gallons of time that any members of our management team or our Board will devote in any time period will vary based on whether a target business has been selected for our initial business combination and the current stagerenewable gasoline could meet approximately 19% of the business combination process.

We believeEIA’s estimated 2022 gasoline demand of 132 billion gallons. Renewable gasoline can be utilized within the operational and transactional experience and industry relationships of our management team and Board will provide us with a substantial number of potential business combination targets. Over the course of their careers, the members of our management team and our Board have developed a broad network of contacts and corporate relationships around the world. This network has grown through the activities of our management team and our Board sourcing, acquiring and financing businesses, and building relationships with sellers, financing sources and management teams. The members of our management team and our Board also have a proven track record of executing transactions under varying economic and financial market conditions, which we believe will make us an attractive partner to potential target businesses.

Our management team also has extensive experience in energy joint ventures. In 2005 Mr. Porter structured a joint venture between Gastar and Chesapeake Energy in which Chesapeake acquired 33% of Gastar’s Deep Bossier play in East Texas along with a 20% equity ownership stake in Gastar’s common stock. In 2010, Mr. Porter lead Gastar’s formation of a joint ventureexisting 268 million internal combustion engine (“ICE”) vehicles in the Marcellus and Utica plays with a South Korean E&P company that resulted in the joint development of Gastar’s 40,000-acre lease position. Also, in 2016, he oversaw the formation of a “Drilco” type joint venture between Gastar and a New York based hedge fund for the drilling of development wells in Kingfisher County, Oklahoma within the “STACK” play.

Our Business Strategy

In addition to industry and lending community relationships, we plan to leverage relationships with management teams of public and private companies, family offices, private equity firms, investment bankers, restructuring advisers, attorneys and accountants, which we believe should provide us with numerous business combination opportunities. Members of our management team and Board will communicate with their networks of relationships to articulate the parameters for our search for a target business and a potential business combination and begin the process of pursuing and reviewing said targets.

One possibility we are exploring is identifying and acquiring long-lived assets with relatively stable decline profiles and low fixed costs supported by existing production and cash flow, but that we believe are underperforming their potential due to capital starvation, shifting ownership focus or geographical stranding.U.S. without vehicle modification. We believe that especiallyour renewable gasoline will be able to utilize essentially all of the existing fossil fuel gasoline distribution and retailing infrastructure, including existing gas stations, making our renewable gasoline a drop-in solution that does not require a change in today’s financialconsumer behavior.

Based on the Fuel Institute’s “Life Cycle Analysis Comparison, 2022,” a single conventional ICE vehicle is accountable for approximately 66 tons of CO2 over a 200,000-mile life, which includes 5 tons of CO2 generated from the manufacturing process, 12 tons of CO2 generated from the production and commodity markets, otherwise fundamentally sound companies can underperform their full-potential due to numerous factors, including lackprocessing of capital, a temporary period of dislocationthe oil and gasoline fuel used in the markets invehicle and 48 tons of CO2 generated from vehicle emissions. We estimate that an ICE vehicle utilizing renewable gasoline produced using our STG+® process with carbon sequestration would be accountable for approximately negative 81 tons of CO2 over a 200,000-mile life, which they operate, over-leveraged capital structures, excessive cost structures, incomplete management teams and/or business strategies that no longer appeal to capital markets. Our management team has extensive experience in identifying and executing such full-potential acquisitionsincludes five tons of CO2 generated from the manufacturing process, negative 134 tons of CO2 from the production of the renewable gasoline fuel used in the energy industry. We plan to capitalizevehicle and 48 tons of CO2 generated from vehicle emissions. As a result, we estimate that an ICE vehicle running solely on renewable gasoline produced using our STG+® process with carbon sequestration would account for over 200% less CO2 emissions over its lifecycle than the broad rangesame vehicle running on traditional hydrocarbon-based gasoline.

Competition

Our traditional competitors in the renewable fuel market include companies in the incumbent petroleum-based industry, as well as those in the emerging renewable fuels industry and others selling carbon credits as a commodity. Our direct competitors are limited. There are only two other companies of our team’s skill sets, backgrounds, experiences, and other intellectual capital, to identify and realize unexploited value. Our management team and Board have successfully executed on this business strategy across multiple energy market cycles, identifying value that the broader market has not recognized and acquiring assets at attractive valuations. Furthermore, we believe that the current market allows for capturing assets at attractive valuations while also taking a conservative approach to valuation. When implementing our business strategy, we will be agnostic about commodity type (e.g., oil or gas) and will place significant emphasis on cash-on-cash returns, which we planare aware that also have their own technology to maximize by employing a conservative capital allocation strategy basedconvert syngas into renewable gasoline: ExxonMobil Corporation (“Exxon”) and Topsoe (“Topsoe”). Although Exxon’s chemistry process is similar to ours, Exxon has historically focused on full cycle economics.larger scale projects and markets. Topsoe, although it also focuses on larger scale projects, only licenses its technology and processes to others and does not produce renewable liquid hydrocarbons. We intendexpect other market participants to mitigate risk through commodity price hedging that will be employed for any producing assets to minimize commodity price risk and lock in projected returns. By using a disciplined approach to capital allocation, both at the time of acquisition and the subsequent optimization of the target, we believe that we can generate meaningful returns for our equity holders. Our objective is to form a sustainable business with multiple competitive advantages and the potential to generate meaningful cash flow in excess of its capital. We believe that a new business model for publicly traded energy companies is emerging that will be based on returning capital to shareholders, either through debt reduction, share buy-backs or dividends. Inherentemerge as competitors in the ability to return capital to shareholders will be a disciplined approach to management that is highly selective of acquisitions, maintains a low leverage profile and keeps overhead costs low. We would expect to grow the business over time, both organically and through acquisitions, with a focus on achieving attractive risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders, while maintaining conservative balance sheet metrics.future.


 

Commodity prices have increased recently dueWe believe our technology, scale, and development capabilities are the competitive strengths that differentiate us from our competition. Utilizing biomass through a gasifier to multiple factors.produce syngas, our proprietary STG+® process can efficiently and economically convert syngas to gasoline. We plan to design our facilities to use modular construction and to operate at a scale that makes the use of renewable feedstocks viable. We believe that these factors will continuewhen using biomass as a feedstock, our ability to influence commodity prices well into 2022. In addition, both public and private capital availabledesign facilities on a smaller scale gives us a competitive advantage, because we are able to deploy equipment to the E&P sectorfeedstock rather than being required to build a large central facility. Our analysis suggests that the economies of scale that may benefit a larger facility are lost with the increased logistics and materials handling costs that come with the larger supply radius required to feed a large-scale facility. Our process remains in a vapor phase throughout resulting in a lower piece-count and, therefore, lower capital cost. We expect that emerging technologies in the future may also present competition to us.

Research & Development

Primus invested over $110 million in developing and patenting its technology and conducted over 10,500 hours of testing at our Hillsborough, New Jersey demonstration facility. Since we acquired Primus’ assets, our team has become scarce, limitinginvested approximately $5 million to design the poolchemical processes and systems required to produce an acceptable synthesis gas from renewable feedstocks, and Verde plans to invest approximately $3 million in 2024 to engage a new FEED study in support of our Permian Basin natural gas-to-gasoline facility, which is expected to take approximately eight months to complete. We expect that the facilities of the scope and scale that we anticipate designing could require an estimated $100 to $200 million of additional capital expenditures per facility and take 18 to 24 months to construct. Our R&D team is also in the early stage of developing additional process technology to produce middle distillates, including diesel and aviation fuel.

Raw Materials and Suppliers

We plan to use renewable feedstocks, such as biomass or natural gas, and other feedstocks to produce our renewable or lower-carbon gasoline. We plan on contracting with various suppliers for renewable feedstocks, and intend to work with other commercial waste companies, agricultural industry participants and landowners to source our renewable feedstocks and maintain an established supply of product inputs. Additionally, to lower feedstock costs and maximize the ease of access to sufficient feedstock volumes for commercial production, we intend to develop future commercial production facilities in locations near biomass, natural gas or other feedstock sources. We do not intend to be dependent on sole source or limited source suppliers for any of our raw materials or chemicals. Additionally, as we intend to rely on various suppliers for the catalysts we use in our STG+® process, we do not expect to be dependent on a sole source for our supply of catalysts.

Human Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2023, we had six full-time employees and engaged six consultants on a part-time basis. Our workforce is mostly concentrated in the Texas and New Jersey regions. We have a seasoned leadership team with over 100 years of cumulative experience in the renewables field or a functionally equivalent industry. Our management team places significant focus and attention on matters concerning our human capital assets, and is focused on supporting diversity, enhancing capability development and succession planning. Accordingly, we review as appropriate employee development and succession plans for each of our functions to identify and develop our pipeline of talent. To date, we have not experienced any work stoppages and consider our relationship with our employees to be in good standing.

Customers

With RBOB as our product, we are able to market to a broad range of potential asset purchasers,counterparties including refiners and importers of gasoline, distributors, blenders, retailers and trading organizations, among others. We intend to enter into offtake agreements with creditworthy counterparties with terms that are acceptable to lenders and us as support for our project financing.

Renewable gasoline. We transitioned into the renewable energy industry after applying our STG+® technology to focus on renewable inputs, expanding our potential customer base beyond the natural gas sector and traditional gasoline consumers in this space. Our potential customers will generally include companies obligated to purchase physical volumes of renewable fuel under the RFS program, such as refiners, blenders, fuel distributors and retailers and marketers, as well as limiting existing companies’ operational flexibility. Escalating tensions resulting from the Russian invasion of Ukraine could lead to increased volatility in global oil and gas prices, including due to increases in oil production by Russia to finance its activities in Ukraine or to destabilize global oil and gas prices. We will also evaluate opportunities to extend our management team’s energy expertise into energy asset related activities that utilize “green” or “clean” components of the energy chain, such as hydrogen-based or renewable fuel supplies or carbon sequestration associated with oil and gas production, as well as natural gas derivative plays such as helium extraction. Many of these types of opportunities may involve traditional oil and gas products as a base and utilize additional processing or technologies to enhance the value proposition.trading shops.

Acquisition Criteria

Consistent with our acquisition strategy, we have identified the following general criteria and guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective target assets and/or businesses. We will use these criteria and guidelines in evaluating acquisition opportunities. While we intend to acquire companies or assets that we believe exhibit one or more of the following characteristics, we may decide to enter into our initial business combination with a target business that does not meet these criteria and guidelines. We intend to focus on companies or assets that we believe have the following characteristics:

Attractive Returns:    we will seek to acquire companies or assets with the ability to generate attractive returns based upon conservative reserve or asset valuations.

Operational Control:    we will seek to acquire companies or assets over which we will have operational control. This will allow our management team to use their operational and financial expertise to create value from existing assets and have control over future capital deployment.

Optimization of Operations:    we will seek to acquire assets or companies that:

present opportunities to reduce costs, increase production or otherwise optimize operations that would result in near-term improved economics and returns to shareholders;

have been underinvested in by current owners due to, among other causes, liquidity limitations resulting from the current commodity price environment, the capital intensity of other operations and balance sheet considerations; and/or

are at an inflection point requiring additional capital, additional operational expertise or are susceptible to innovative and superior optimization techniques that drive improved financial performance.

Ease of Operating:    Health, Safety, Security, Environmental and Social (“HSSES”) standards, procedures and performance will be a critical element of future operational activity; historical records and performance will be an essential element in assessing suitability for future efficient and effective performance. We will attempt to avoid operations that result in the potential for harmful greenhouse gas emissions and will seek to use industry “best practices” for minimizing the environmental impact of all operations.


 

These criteria are not intendedNatural Gas. We have a strategic partnership with Cottonmouth Ventures LLC, a subsidiary of Diamondback, to be exhaustive. Any evaluation relating to the merits of a particular initial business combination may be based, to the extent relevant, on these general guidelines as well as other considerations, factors and criteria that our management may deem relevant. If we decide to enter into our initial business combination with a target business that does not meet the above criteria and guidelines, we will disclose that the target business does not meet the above criteria in our shareholder communications related to our initial business combination, which would bedevelop natural gas-to-gasoline facilities in the form of proxy solicitation materials or tender offer documents that we would file with the SEC.

Initial Business Combination

Our initial business combination must occur with one or more target businesses that together have an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the assets held in the trust account (excluding the deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payable on the income earned on the trust account) at the time of the agreement to enter into the initial business combination. If our Board is not able to independently determine the fair market value of the target business or businesses, we will obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or FINRA or an independent accounting firm with respect to the satisfaction of such criteria. Except as required by applicable law, our stockholders may not be provided with a copy of such opinion, nor will they be able to rely on such opinion.

Any party may co-invest with us in the target business at the time of our initial business combination, or we could raise additional proceeds to complete the acquisition by issuing a class of equity or equity-linked securities to specified purchasers that we may determine in connection with financing our initial business combination. We refer to this potential future issuance, or a similar issuance to other specified purchasers, as a “specified future issuance” throughout this Annual Report. The amount and other terms and conditions of any such specified future issuance would be determined at the time thereof. We are not obligated to make any specified future issuance and may determine not to do so. This is not an offer for any specified future issuance. Pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions of our Class B common stock, any such specified future issuance would result in an adjustment to the conversion ratio such that our initial stockholders and their permitted transferees, if any, would retain their aggregate percentage ownership at 20% of the sum of the total number of all shares of common stock outstanding plus all shares issued in the specified future issuance, unless the holders of a majority of the then outstanding shares of Class B common stock agreed to waive such adjustment with respect to the specified future issuance at the time thereof. We cannot determine at this time whether a majority of the holders of our Class B common stock at the time of any such specified future issuance would agree to waive such adjustment to the conversion ratio. If such adjustment is not waived, the specified future issuance would not reduce the percentage ownership of holders of our Class B common stock but would reduce the percentage ownership of holders of our Class A common stock. If such adjustment is waived, the specified future issuance would reduce the percentage ownership of holders of both classes of our common stock.

Our Acquisition Process

Permian Basin. We believe that conducting comprehensive due diligence on prospective investments is particularly important withinthese facilities will create a higher-value sales channel for natural gas producers by converting economically disadvantaged natural gas into high value gasoline. Verde believes that similar strategic partnerships can be formed in other natural gas constrained basins such as the energy sector. We will useAppalachian Basin, the diligence, rigor,Williston Basin, and expertisethe Uinta Basin. These opportunities are not limited to producing basins in the United States. The Company expects to find similar opportunities globally.

Carbon credits. Expanding the application of our management, membersSTG+® technology will also expand how we can create revenue opportunities. We expect the value of our Boardoperations will include carbon credits derived from converting waste and other bio-feedstocks into a single, finished fuel, which can have value. For example, certain gasoline produced from renewable feedstock, such as cellulosic biomass, qualifies under the RFS for the D3 RIN (a carbon credit). Similarly, we expect that gasoline produced in this fashion will also qualify for various state carbon programs including California’s LCFS. We anticipate that we will produce 1.5 RINs per gallon of gasoline, which can be sold alongside each gallon of renewable gasoline as a separate commodity to customers who can sell the RINs later or solely into forward or futures markets.

However, as with other government programs, the use requirements of the RFS program and similar state-level programs are subject to change, which could materially harm our technical committeeability to evaluate potential targets’ strengths, weaknesses,operate profitably.

Regulatory Environment

Demand for renewable fuel has grown significantly over the past several years and opportunitiesis expected to identifycontinue to grow due in part to federal requirements for cellulosic biofuel volume obligations through programs such as the relative riskRFS, which was created under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (the “Energy Act”), which amended the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) and return profilewas expanded through the Energy Independence and Security Act of any potential target2007 (the “EISA”). The EISA requires the use of specific volumes of biofuel in the U.S. and is aimed at (i) increasing energy security by reducing U.S. dependence on foreign oil and establishing domestic green fuel related industries and (ii) improving the environment through the reduction of greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. Under the RFS program, transportation fuel sold in the U.S. must contain a certain minimum volume of renewable fuel. The EPA administers the RFS program with volume requirements for our initial business combination. Given our management team’s tenure investingseveral categories of renewable fuels, which volume requirements are established through a notice-and-comment rulemaking process intended to occur at least 14 months prior to the year in which the volume will be required. On July 12, 2023 (as corrected on August 3, 2023), EPA issued its latest final rule that establishes the biofuel volume requirements for 2023 to 2025. Importantly, these most recent volume requirements include a steady growth of biofuels for 2023, 2024 and 2025. See “Business — Regulatory Mandates and Governmental Funding” for more information. However, as stated above, the RFS program is subject to change, including by modification or repeal by Congressional action or action by the EPA or the EPA administrator and EPA has, in some cases, failed to issue volume requirements sufficiently far in advance, which can contribute to uncertainty for producers of renewable fuels, like us. Similarly, state-level programs like California’s LCFS are also subject to change.

Social and Environmental Preferences and Investor Pressures

The effects of climate change, including extreme weather events and rising temperature and the increased health and socio-economic stability of at-risk populations, have increased public focus on reducing greenhouse gases and moving toward reduced carbon energy solutions. Because of this, we see environmentally conscious policies, initiatives and businesses growing in value and preference among certain stakeholders.

For example, certain segments of the investor community have enhanced their consideration of Environmental, social and corporate governance (“ESG”) factors during the investment process and/or shifted their portfolios away from carbon-intensive assets. In addition, a number of large integrated energy companies we will often be familiar with the prospective target areahave set decarbonization strategies and diversified into different forms of operation, upside potentialcarbon-free and potential risks.carbon-reduced energy.

In evaluating a prospective initial business combination, we expect to conduct a thorough diligence review that will encompass, among other things, meetings with incumbent management and employees, document reviews, inspection of assets and facilities and financial analyses, as well as a review of other information that will be made available to us.Governmental Regulations

Our future operations are subject to stringent and complex laws and regulations governing environmental protection and human health and safety. Compliance with such laws and regulations can be costly, and noncompliance can result in substantial penalties. Laws and regulations that may have an impact on our business include:

The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (or “CERCLA”) and analogous state laws, impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or the legality of the original act, on certain classes of persons that contributed to the release of a hazardous substance into the environment. These persons include the owner and operator of the site where the release occurred, past owners and operators of the site, and companies that disposed of or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances found at the site. Responsible parties under CERCLA may be liable for the costs of cleaning up hazardous substances that have been released into the environment and for damages to natural resources. Additionally, it is not uncommon for third parties to assert claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances or other pollutants into the environment.


 

The federal Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (or “RCRA”), is the principal federal statute governing the management of wastes, including the treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous wastes. RCRA imposes stringent operating requirements and liability for failure to meet such requirements, on a person who is either a generator or transporter of hazardous waste or an owner or operator of a hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility. We anticipate that many wastes generated by our manufacturing facility or process will be governed by RCRA.

The federal Water Pollution Control Act (also referred to as the “Clean Water Act”) imposes restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants into navigable waters. These controls have become more stringent over the years, and it is possible that additional restrictions may be imposed in the future. Permits must be obtained to discharge pollutants into state and federal waters. The Clean Water Act provides for civil, criminal and administrative penalties for discharges of oil and other pollutants and imposes liability on parties responsible for those discharges for the costs of cleaning up any environmental damage caused by the release and for natural resource damages resulting from the release. Comparable state statutes impose liability and authorize penalties in the case of an unauthorized discharge of petroleum or its derivatives or other pollutants into state waters.

The CAA and associated state laws and regulations restrict the emission of air pollutants from many sources, including facilities involved in manufacturing biofuels. New facilities are generally required to obtain permits before operations can commence, and new or existing facilities may be required to incur certain capital expenditures to install air pollution control equipment in connection with obtaining and maintaining operating permits and approvals. Federal and state regulatory agencies can impose administrative, civil, and criminal penalties for non-compliance with permits or other requirements of the CAA and associated state laws and regulations.

The federal Endangered Species Act, the federal Marine Mammal Protection Act and similar federal and state wildlife protection laws prohibit or restrict activities that could adversely impact protected plant and animal species or habitats. Construction of facilities could be prohibited or delayed in areas where such protected species or habitats may be located, or mitigation may be required to accommodate such activities. There is also increasing interest in nature-related matters beyond protected species, such as general biodiversity, which may similarly require us or our customers to incur costs or take other measures which may adversely impact our business or operations.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IR Act”) provides for, among other things, a new clean hydrogen production tax credit, a new credit for sustainable aviation fuel, credits for the production and purchase of electric vehicles, expanding eligibility for and increasing the value of the carbon capture and sequestration credit, extending the biodiesel, renewable diesel and alternative fuels tax credit, funding biofuel refueling infrastructure and providing additional funding for working lands conservation programs for farmers. The IR Act could have many potential impacts on our business that we are continuing to evaluate, including new opportunities to access production tax credits, carbon sequestration credits, and other benefits, which could result in changes in the configuration of the plant, and could slightly delay commercial operation.

We may be required to obtain certain permits to construct and operate our facilities, including those related to air emissions, solid and hazardous waste management and water quality. These permits can be difficult and expensive to obtain and maintain. Our ability to evaluate assets and/obtain these permits could be impacted by opposition from various stakeholders. Once operational, our facilities will also need to maintain compliance with these permits.

In addition to compliance with environmental regulations, we expect that our future operations will be subject to federal RFS program regulations. The EPA administers the RFS program with volume requirements for several categories of renewable fuels, which volume requirements are established through a notice-and-comment rulemaking process intended to occur at least 14 months prior to the year in which the volume will be required. On July 12, 2023 (as corrected on August 3, 2023), EPA issued a final rule that establishes the biofuel volume requirements for 2023 to 2025. The EPA calculates a blending standard annually based on estimates of gasoline usage from the EIA. Different quotas and blending requirements are determined for cellulosic biofuels, biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuels and total renewable fuel. RINs are used to ensure that the prescribed levels of blending are met. EPA’s RFS regulations establish rules for fuel supplied and administer the RIN system for compliance, trading credits and rules for waivers. We anticipate that our renewable gasoline and other future products will benefit from the RFS program. However, as stated above, the use requirements of the RFS program or businesses is greatly enhancedstate programs could change, which may impact our products and harm our ability to operate profitably. See “Business— Regulatory Mandates and Government Funding” for more information.


Climate Change, Regulatory Mandates and Government Funding

Climate change continues to attract considerable public and scientific attention. As a result, numerous proposals have been made and may continue to be made at the international, national, regional, and state levels of government to monitor and limit emissions of GHGs, with the reduction of greenhouse gases from the energy and transportation sectors being a key focus.

For example, continued increases in the federal requirement for cellulosic biofuel volume obligations position us to benefit as a producer of renewable gasoline from cellulosic feedstocks, which we expect will allow us to qualify for the RFS program.

The RFS program was created under the Energy Act, which amended the CAA. The EISA further amended the CAA by expanding the prior experience and expertiseRFS program. The EPA implements the RFS program under the guidance of our management team and technical committee. We plan to incorporate a rigorous due diligence process that will lever the diverse experience and talentsU.S. Department of managementAgriculture and the Technical Committee.Department of Energy.

CertainThe RFS program is a federal policy that requires a certain volume of our officersrenewable fuel to replace or reduce the quantity of petroleum-based transportation fuel, heating oil or aviation fuel. The four renewable fuel categories under the RFS are each assigned a “D-code” — a code that identifies the renewable fuel type — based on the feedstock used, fuel type produced, energy inputs and directorsGHG reduction thresholds, among other requirements. The four categories of renewable fuel have the following assigned D-codes, as shown below. Lifecycle GHG reduction comparisons are employedbased on a 2005 petroleum baseline as mandated by or affiliated with various investment companies or funds. Such fundsEISA. Biofuel facilities (domestic and individualsforeign) that were producing fuel prior to enactment of EISA in 2007 are continuously made aware of potential investment opportunities, one or more of which we may desireconsidered “grandfathered” under the statute, meaning these facilities are not required to pursue for a business combination, but we have not (nor has anyone on our behalf, including members of our Board) contacted any prospective target business or had any substantive discussions, formal or otherwise, with respect to a business combination transaction with any prospective target business.meet the GHG reductions.

Cellulosic biofuel, must be produced from cellulose, hemicellulose or lignin and must meet a 60% lifecycle GHG reduction, is assigned a D-code of 3 (cellulosic biofuel) or a D-code of 7 (cellulosic diesel);

Biomass-based diesel, which must meet a 50% lifecycle GHG reduction, is assigned a D-code of 4;

Advanced biofuel which can be produced from qualifying renewable biomass (except corn starch) and must meet a 50% GHG reduction, is assigned a D-code of 5; and

Renewable fuel (non-advanced/conventional biofuel, like ethanol from corn starch) is assigned a D-code of 6 (grandfathered fuels are also assigned a D-code of 6) and must meet a 20% lifecycle GHG reduction threshold.

We may, at our option, pursue an opportunity with an entity to which an officer or director has a fiduciary or contractual obligation. Any such entity may co-invest with us in the target business at the time of our initial business combination, or we could raise additional proceeds to complete the acquisition by making a specified future issuance to any such entity. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we renounce our interest in any corporate opportunity offered to any director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of our company and such opportunity is one we are legally and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for us to pursue.

Status as a Public Company

We believe our structurerenewable gasoline will make us an attractive business combination partner to target businesses. As an existing public company, we offer a target business an alternative toqualify under the traditional initial public offering through a merger or other business combination. In this situation,cellulosic biofuel category, qualifying for the ownersD3 RIN.

The 2007 enactment of EISA significantly increased the size of the target business would exchange their sharesprogram and included key changes, including:

boosting the long-term goals to 36 billion gallons of renewable fuel;

extending yearly volume requirements out to 2022 by statute and, after 2022, establishing a notice-and-comment rulemaking process by which EPA must determine the applicable volumes at least 14 months prior to the year in which the volume will be required (on July 12, 2023 (as corrected on August 3, 2023), EPA issued a final rule that establishes the biofuel volume requirements for 2023 to 2025);

adding explicit definitions for renewable fuels to qualify (e.g., renewable biomass, GHG emissions) versus a 2005 petroleum baseline);

creating grandfathering allowances for volumes from certain existing facilities; and

including specific types of waiver authorities.


EPA has the authority to adjust cellulosic, advanced and total volumes set by Congress as part of stockthe annual rule process.

The statute also contains a general waiver authority that allows the Administrator to waive the RFS volumes, in whole or in part, based on a determination that implementation of the program is causing severe economic or environmental harm, or based on inadequate domestic supply.

The EPA has approved fuel pathways under the RFS program under all four categories of renewable fuel. Advanced pathways already approved include ethanol made from sugarcane, jet fuel made from camelina, cellulosic ethanol made from corn stover, compressed natural gas from municipal wastewater treatment facility digesters and others. We believe our fuel will qualify for Pathway M.

Lifecycle GHG reduction comparisons are based on a 2005 petroleum baseline as mandated by EISA. Biofuel facilities (domestic and foreign) that were producing fuel prior to enactment of EISA in 2007 are “grandfathered” under the statute, meaning these facilities are not required to meet the GHG reductions.

The EPA continues to review and approve new pathways, including for fuels made with advanced technologies or with new feedstocks. Certain biofuels, such as our renewable gasoline, are similar enough to gasoline or diesel that they do not have to be blended, but can be simply “dropped in” to existing petroleum-based fuels. These drop-in biofuels directly replace petroleum-based fuels and hold particular promise for the future.

Obligated parties under the RFS program are refiners or importers of gasoline or diesel fuel (“Obligated Parties”). Compliance is achieved by blending renewable fuels into transportation fuel, or by obtaining credits, RINs, to meet an EPA-specified renewable volume obligation (“RVO”).

The EPA calculates and establishes RVOs every year through rulemaking, based on the CAA volume requirements and projections of gasoline and diesel production for the coming year. The standards are converted into a percentage and Obligated Parties must demonstrate compliance annually.

Obligated Parties use RINs to demonstrate compliance with the standard. These parties must obtain sufficient RINs for each category in order to demonstrate compliance with the annual standard. Some of the regulations regarding RINs include the following:

RINs are generated when a producer makes a gallon of renewable fuel.

At the end of the compliance year, Obligated Parties use RINs to demonstrate compliance.

RINs can be traded between parties.

Obligated Parties can buy gallons of renewable fuel with RINs attached. They can also buy RINs on the open market.

Obligated Parties can carry over unused RINs between compliance years. They may carry a compliance deficit into the next year. This deficit must be made up the following year.

The RFS program’s four renewable fuel categories are “nested” within each other. This means the fuel with a higher GHG reduction threshold can be used to meet the standards for a lower GHG reduction threshold. For example, fuels or RINs for advanced biofuel (e.g., cellulosic, biodiesel or sugarcane ethanol) can be used to meet the total renewable fuel standards.

For cellulosic standards, an additional flexibility is provided by statute. Cellulosic waiver credits (“CWCs”) have historically been offered at a price determined by a formula in the target businessEnergy Act. Obligated Parties had the option of purchasing CWCs plus an advanced RIN in lieu of blending cellulosic biofuel or obtaining a cellulosic RIN. As a result, CWCs, in some cases, set a ceiling for sharescellulosic RIN prices. However, in the EPA’s July 12, 2023 rule (as corrected on August 3, 2023), EPA interpreted its authority in setting RIN volumes for 2023 through 2025 (which, for the first time were not set forth in statute) so as to preclude it from issuing CWCs in those years, absent a future waiver of our stock or for a combination of shares of our stock and cash, allowing us to tailor the consideration to the specific needs of the sellers. Although there are various costs and obligations associated with being a public company, we believe target businesses will find this method a more certain and cost-effective method to becoming a public company than the typical initial public offering. In a typical initial public offering, there are additional expenses incurred in marketing, road show and public reporting efforts that may not be present to the same extent in connection with a business combination with us.EPA-established cellulosic standards.

Furthermore, once a proposed business combination is completed,


In November 2021, the target business will have effectively become public, whereas an initial public offering is always subject to the underwriters’ ability to complete the offering,U.S. Infrastructure Investment and JOBS Act was signed into law that includes $65 billion in funding for power and grid investments. This includes investments in grid reliability and resiliency as well as generalclean energy technologies such as carbon capture, hydrogen and advanced nuclear, including small modular reactors. Additionally, in December 2021, President Biden signed an executive order mandating all electricity procured by the government be 100% carbon pollution-free by 2030, including at least 50% from around-the-clock dispatchable generation sources. The order also requires that federally owned buildings produce no net emissions by 2045 and that each federal agency achieve 100% zero-emission vehicle acquisitions by 2035.

At the international level, in February 2021, the Biden administration announced reentry of the U.S. into the Paris Agreement (an international agreement from the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris, France, which resulted in an agreement intended for countries to nationally determine their contributions and set GHG emission reduction goals along with a “nationally determined contribution” for U.S. GHG emissions that would achieve emissions reductions of at least 50% relative to 2005 levels by 2030. In addition, in 2021, President Biden publicly announced the Global Methane Pledge, a pact that aims to reduce global methane emissions at least 30% below 2020 levels by 2030, including “all feasible reductions” in the energy sector. Since its formal launch at the United Nations Climate Change Conference, over 150 countries have joined the pledge. At the 27th Conference of the Parties, President Biden announced the EPA’s supplemental proposed rule to reduce methane emissions from existing oil and gas sources and agreed, in conjunction with the European Union and a number of other partner countries, to develop standards for monitoring and reporting methane emissions to help create a market conditions, which could delayfor low methane intensity natural gas. Subsequently, at the 28th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Dubai, member countries (including the United States) entered into an agreement that calls for actions toward achieving, at a global scale, a tripling of renewable energy capacity and doubling energy efficiency improvements by 2030. The goals of the agreement are, among other things, to accelerate efforts toward the phase-down of unabated coal power, phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, and take other measures that drive the transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems. Furthermore, many state and local leaders have intensified or preventstated their intent to intensify efforts to support international climate commitments and treaties, in addition to considering or enacting laws requiring the offering from occurring or could have negative valuation consequences. Once public, we believe the target business would then have greater access to capitaldisclosure of climate-related information and an additionaldeveloping programs that are aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions by means of providing management incentives consistent with stockholders’ interests. It can offer further benefits by augmenting a company’s profile among potential new customerscap and vendors and aid in attracting talented employees.trade programs, carbon taxes or encouraging the use of renewable energy or alternative low-carbon fuels.

In addition, in March 2024, the SEC issued a rule regarding the enhancement and standardization of mandatory climate-related disclosures for investors. The rule mandates extensive disclosure of climate-related data, risks, and opportunities, including financial impacts, physical and transition risks, related governance and strategy, and, in some instances, Scopes 1 and 2 GHG emissions, for certain public companies.

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 711 Louisiana St, Suite 2160, Houston, Texas 77002. Our website is located at www.verdecleanfuels.com.

We furnish or file with the SEC our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and our Current Reports on Form 8-K. We make these documents available free of charge at www.verdecleanfuels.com under the “Investors” tab as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed or furnished with the SEC. In addition, corporate governance information, including our corporate governance guidelines and code of ethics, is also available on our investor relations website under the heading “Governance Documents.” Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any of our other filings with the SEC. The SEC also maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy statements and other information about issuers, like us, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is www.sec.gov.

Emerging Growth Company and Smaller Reporting Company Status

We qualify as an “emerging growth company,”company” as defined in Section 2(a)the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. As such, we are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the prices of our securities may be more volatile.

In addition,2012 (the “JOBS Act”). Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides thatpermits an “emerging growth company” canto take advantage of thean extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complyingtime to comply with new or revised accounting standards. In other words,standards as applicable to public companies. Thus, an “emergingemerging growth company”company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We dohave irrevocably opted out of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not intendemerging growth companies. As a result, our financial statements may not be comparable to other emerging growth companies that elect to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period.

We will cease to be an “emerging growth company” upon the earliest to occur of: (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have more than $1.235 billion in annual revenue; (ii) the date we qualify as a large accelerated filer, with at least $700 million of equity securities held by non-affiliates; (iii) the date on which we have, in any three-year period, issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt securities; and (iv) December 31, 2026 (the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of CENAQ becoming a public company).

We are also a “smaller reporting company” as defined in the Exchange Act and may continue to be a smaller reporting company even after we are no longer an emerging growth company. We may take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures and reporting requirements available to smaller reporting companies until the fiscal year following the determination that our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is $250 million or more measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter, or our annual revenues $100 million or more during the most recently completed fiscal year and our election to opt outvoting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is irrevocable.$700 million or more measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter.


 

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of the IPO, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion (as adjusted for inflation pursuant to SEC rules from time to time), or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our Class A common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period.

Additionally, we are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements. We will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of any fiscal year for so long as either (1) the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates did not exceed $250 million as of the prior June 30, or (2) our annual revenues did not exceed $100 million during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates did not exceed $700 million as of the prior June 30.

Financial Position

With funds in the trust account available for a business combination initially in the amount of $174,225,000 in full ($10.10 per unit), in each case before underwriting commissions, fees and expenses associated with our initial business combination, we offer a target business a variety of options such as creating a liquidity event for its owners, providing capital for the potential growth and expansion of its operations or strengthening its balance sheet by reducing its debt or leverage ratio. Because we are able to complete our business combination using our cash, debt or equity securities, or a combination of the foregoing, we have the flexibility to use the most efficient combination that will allow us to tailor the consideration to be paid to the target business to fit its needs and desires. However, we have not taken any steps to secure third party financing and there can be no assurance it will be available to us.

Effecting our Initial Business Combination

We are not presently engaged in, and we will not engage in, any operations for an indefinite period of time following the IPO. We intend to complete our initial business combination using cash from the proceeds of the IPO and the private placement of the private placement warrants, our capital stock, debt or a combination of these as the consideration to be paid in our initial business combination. We may seek to complete our initial business combination with a company or business that may be financially unstable or in its early stages of development or growth, which would subject us to the numerous risks inherent in such companies and businesses.

If our initial business combination is paid for using equity or debt securities, or not all of the funds released from the trust account are used for payment of the consideration in connection with our business combination or used for redemptions of our Class A common stock, we may apply the balance of the cash released to us from the trust account for general corporate purposes, including for maintenance or expansion of operations of the post-transaction company, the payment of principal or interest due on indebtedness incurred in completing our initial business combination, to fund the purchase of other assets, companies or for working capital.

We may seek to raise additional funds through a private offering of debt or equity securities in connection with the completion of our initial business combination (which may include a specified future issuance), and we may complete our initial business combination using the proceeds of such offering rather than using the amounts held in the trust account. Subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, we would expect to complete such financing only simultaneously with the completion of our business combination. In the case of an initial business combination funded with assets other than the trust account assets, our tender offer documents or proxy materials disclosing the business combination would disclose the terms of the financing and, only if required by law, we would seek stockholder approval of such financing. There are no prohibitions on our ability to raise funds privately, including pursuant to any specified future issuance, or through loans in connection with our initial business combination. At this time, we are not a party to any arrangement or understanding with any third party with respect to raising any additional funds through the sale of securities or otherwise.


The time required to select and evaluate a target business and to structure and complete our initial business combination, and the costs associated with this process, are not currently ascertainable with any degree of certainty. Any costs incurred with respect to the identification and evaluation of a prospective target business with which our business combination is not ultimately completed will result in our incurring losses and will reduce the funds we can use to complete another business combination.

Sources of Target Businesses

We expect to receive a number of proprietary transaction opportunities to originate as a result of the business relationships, direct outreach, and deal sourcing activities of our officers and directors. In addition to the proprietary deal flow, we anticipate that target business candidates will be brought to our attention from various unaffiliated sources, including investment banking firms, consultants, accounting firms, private equity groups, large business enterprises, and other market participants. These sources may also introduce us to target businesses in which they think we may be interested on an unsolicited basis, since many of these sources will have read our reports and know what types of businesses we are targeting. Our officers and directors, as well as their affiliates, may also bring to our attention target business candidates that they become aware of through their business contacts as a result of formal or informal inquiries or discussions they may have, as well as attending trade shows or conventions. Some of our officers or directors may enter into employment or consulting agreements with the post-transaction company following our initial business combination. The presence or absence of any such fees or arrangements will not be used as a criterion in our selection process of an acquisition candidate. In no event will our sponsor or any of our existing officers or directors, or any entity with which they are affiliated, be paid any finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation before, or for any services they render in order to effectuate, the completion of our initial business combination (regardless of the type of transaction that it is). However, in connection with the successful completion of our initial business combination, we may determine to provide a payment to our sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or our or their affiliates, which payment would not be made from the proceeds of the IPO held in the trust account. We currently do not have any agreement or arrangement with our sponsor, any of our officers, directors, advisors or our or their affiliates to make any such payments.

We are not prohibited from pursuing an initial business combination with a business combination target that is affiliated with our sponsor, officers or directors or making the acquisition through a joint venture or other form of shared ownership with our sponsor, officers or directors. In the event we seek to complete our initial business combination with a business combination target that is affiliated with our sponsor, officers or directors, we, or a committee of independent directors, would obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm which is a member of FINRA or an independent accounting firm that such an initial business combination is fair to our company from a financial point of view. We are not required to obtain such an opinion in any other context. If any of our officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity that falls within the line of business of any entity to which he or she has pre-existing fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she may be required to present such business combination opportunity to such entity before presenting such business combination opportunity to us. Any such entity may co-invest with us in the target business at the time of our initial business combination, or we could raise additional proceeds to complete the acquisition by making a specified future issuance to any such entity.

Lack of Business Diversification

For an indefinite period of time after the completion of our initial business combination, the prospects for our success may depend entirely on the future performance of a single business. Unlike other entities that have the resources to complete business combinations with multiple entities in one or several industries, it is probable that we will not have the resources to diversify our operations and mitigate the risks of being in a single line of business. By completing our business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may:

subject us to negative economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact on the particular industry in which we operate after our initial business combination, and

cause us to depend on the marketing and sale of a single product or limited number of products or services.


Limited Ability to Evaluate the Target’s Management Team

Although we intend to closely scrutinize the management of a prospective target business when evaluating the desirability of effecting our business combination with that business, our assessment of the target business’ management may not prove to be correct. In addition, the future management may not have the necessary skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company. Furthermore, the future role of members of our management team or of our Board, if any, in the target business cannot presently be stated with any certainty. While it is possible that one or more of our directors will remain associated in some capacity with us following our business combination, it is presently unknown if any of them will devote their full efforts to our affairs after our business combination. Moreover, we cannot assure you that members of our management team will have significant experience or knowledge relating to the operations of the particular target business. The determination as to whether any members of our Board will remain with the combined company will be made at the time of our initial business combination.

Following a business combination, to the extent that we deem it necessary, we may seek to recruit additional managers to supplement the incumbent management team of the target business. We cannot assure you that we will have the ability to recruit additional managers, or that additional managers will have the requisite skills, knowledge or experience necessary to enhance the incumbent management.

Stockholders May Not Have the Ability to Approve our Initial Business Combination

We may conduct redemptions without a stockholder vote pursuant to the tender offer rules of the SEC. However, we will seek stockholder approval if it is required by law or applicable stock exchange rule, or we may decide to seek stockholder approval for business or other legal reasons. Presented in the table below is a graphic explanation of the types of initial business combinations we may consider and whether stockholder approval is currently required under Delaware law for each such transaction.

Type of TransactionWhether
Stockholder
Approval is
Required
Purchase of assetsNo
Purchase of stock of target not involving a merger with the companyNo
Merger of target into a subsidiary of the companyNo
Merger of the company with a targetYes

Under NASDAQ’s listing rules, stockholder approval would be required for our initial business combination if, for example:

we issue shares of Class A common stock that will be equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of shares of our Class A common stock then outstanding;

any of our directors, officers or substantial stockholders (as defined by NASDAQ rules) has a 5% or greater interest (or such persons collectively have a 10% or greater interest), directly or indirectly, in the target business or assets to be acquired or otherwise and the present or potential issuance of common stock could result in an increase in outstanding common shares or voting power of 5% or more; or

the issuance or potential issuance of common stock will result in our undergoing a change of control.


Permitted Purchases of our Securities

In the event we seek stockholder approval of our business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates may purchase shares or public warrants in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market either before or after the completion of our initial business combination. There is no limit on the number of shares our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates may purchase in such transactions, subject to compliance with applicable law and the rules of NASDAQ. However, they have no current commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions and have not formulated any terms or conditions for any such transactions. None of the funds in the trust account will be used to purchase shares or public warrants in such transactions. If they engage in such transactions, they will not make any such purchases when they are in possession of any material non-public information not disclosed to the seller or if such purchases are prohibited by Regulation M under the Exchange Act. Such a purchase may include a contractual acknowledgement that such stockholder, although still the record holder of our shares is no longer the beneficial owner thereof and therefore agrees not to exercise its redemption rights. If our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions from public stockholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling stockholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares. We do not currently anticipate that such purchases, if any, would constitute a tender offer subject to the tender offer rules under the Exchange Act or a going-private transaction subject to the going-private rules under the Exchange Act; however, if the purchasers determine at the time of any such purchases that the purchases are subject to such rules, the purchasers will comply with such rules.

The purpose of any such purchases of shares could be to (i) vote such shares in favor of the business combination and thereby increase the likelihood of obtaining stockholder approval of the business combination or (ii) to satisfy a closing condition in an agreement with a target that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash at the closing of our business combination, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise not be met. The purpose of any such purchases of public warrants could be to reduce the number of public warrants outstanding or to vote such warrants on any matters submitted to the warrant holders for approval in connection with our initial business combination. Any such purchases of our securities may result in the completion of our business combination that may not otherwise have been possible.

In addition, if such purchases are made, the public “float” of our common stock may be reduced and the number of beneficial holders of our securities may be reduced, which may make it difficult to maintain or obtain the quotation, listing or trading of our securities on a national securities exchange.

Our sponsor, officers, directors, advisors and/or their affiliates anticipate that they may identify the stockholders with whom our sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or their affiliates may pursue privately negotiated purchases by either the stockholders contacting us directly or by our receipt of redemption requests submitted by stockholders following our mailing of proxy materials in connection with our initial business combination. To the extent that our sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or their affiliates enter into a private purchase, they would identify and contact only potential selling stockholders who have expressed their election to redeem their shares for a pro rata share of the trust account or vote against the business combination. Our sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or their affiliates will only purchase shares if such purchases comply with Regulation M under the Exchange Act and the other federal securities laws.

Any purchases by our sponsor, officers, directors, advisors and/or their affiliates who are affiliated purchasers under Rule 10b-18 under the Exchange Act will only be made to the extent such purchases are able to be made in compliance with Rule 10b-18, which is a safe harbor from liability for manipulation under Section 9(a)(2) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act. Rule 10b-18 has certain technical requirements that must be complied with in order for the safe harbor to be available to the purchaser. Our sponsor, officers, directors, advisors and/or their affiliates will not make purchases of common stock if the purchases would violate Section 9(a)(2) or Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act. Any such purchases will be reported pursuant to Section 13 and Section 16 of the Exchange Act to the extent such purchasers are subject to such reporting requirements.


Redemption Rights for Public Stockholders upon Completion of our Initial Business Combination

We will provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their shares of Class A common stock upon the completion of our initial business combination at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account as of two business days before the consummation of the initial business combination including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the trust account, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, subject to the limitations described herein. The amount in the trust account is initially anticipated to be approximately $10.10 per public share. The per-share amount we will distribute to investors who properly redeem their shares will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting commissions we will pay to the underwriters. Our sponsor, officers and directors have entered into a letter agreement with us, pursuant to which they have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to any founder shares and any public shares held by them in connection with the completion of our business combination. The anchor investors will not be entitled to redemption rights with respect to any founder shares held by them in connection with the completion of our business combination.

Manner of Conducting Redemptions

We will provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their shares of Class A common stock upon the completion of our initial business combination either (i) in connection with a stockholder meeting called to approve the business combination or (ii) by means of a tender offer. The decision as to whether we will seek stockholder approval of a proposed business combination or conduct a tender offer will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would require us to seek stockholder approval under the law or stock exchange listing requirement. Asset acquisitions and stock purchases would not typically require stockholder approval while direct mergers with our company where we do not survive and any transactions where we issue more than 20% of our outstanding common stock or seek to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation would require stockholder approval. If we structure a business combination transaction with a target company in a manner that requires stockholder approval, we will not have discretion as to whether to seek a stockholder vote to approve the proposed business combination. We intend to conduct redemptions without a stockholder vote pursuant to the tender offer rules of the SEC unless stockholder approval is required by law or stock exchange listing requirements or we choose to seek stockholder approval for business or other legal reasons. So long as we obtain and maintain a listing for our securities on NASDAQ, we will be required to comply with such rules.

If a stockholder vote is not required and we do not decide to hold a stockholder vote for business or other legal reasons, we will, pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation:

conduct the redemptions pursuant to Rule 13e-4 and Regulation 14E of the Exchange Act, which regulate issuer tender offers, and

file tender offer documents with the SEC before completing our initial business combination that contain substantially the same financial and other information about the initial business combination and the redemption rights as is required under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, which regulates the solicitation of proxies.

Upon the public announcement of our business combination, we or our sponsor will terminate any plan established in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 to purchase shares of our Class A common stock in the open market if we elect to redeem our public shares through a tender offer, to comply with Rule 14e-5 under the Exchange Act.

If we conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, our offer to redeem will remain open for at least 20 business days, in accordance with Rule 14e-1(a) under the Exchange Act, and we will not be permitted to complete our initial business combination until the expiration of the tender offer period. In addition, the tender offer will be conditioned on public stockholders not tendering more than a specified number of public shares which are not purchased by our sponsor, which number will be based on the requirement that we may not redeem public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 upon completion of our initial business combination (so that we are not subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules) or any greater net tangible asset or cash requirement which may be contained in the agreement relating to our initial business combination. If public stockholders tender more shares than we have offered to purchase, we will withdraw the tender offer and not complete the initial business combination.


If, however, stockholder approval of the transaction is required by law or stock exchange listing requirement, or we decide to obtain stockholder approval for business or other legal reasons, we will, pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation:

conduct the redemptions in conjunction with a proxy solicitation pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, which regulates the solicitation of proxies, and not pursuant to the tender offer rules, and

file proxy materials with the SEC.

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, we will distribute proxy materials and, in connection therewith, provide our public stockholders with the redemption rights described above upon completion of the initial business combination.

If we seek stockholder approval, we will complete our initial business combination only if a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock voted are voted in favor of the business combination. A quorum for such meeting will consist of the holders present in person or by proxy of shares of outstanding capital stock of the company representing a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares of capital stock of the company entitled to vote at such meeting. Our sponsor will count toward this quorum and has agreed to vote its founder shares and any public shares purchased during or after the IPO, and the anchor investors have agreed to vote any founder shares held by them, in favor of our initial business combination. For purposes of seeking approval of the majority of our outstanding shares of common stock voted, non-votes will have no effect on the approval of our initial business combination once a quorum is obtained. We intend to give approximately 30 days (but not less than 10 days nor more than 60 days) prior written notice of any such meeting, if required, at which a vote shall be taken to approve our initial business combination. These quorum and voting thresholds, and the voting agreement of our sponsor, and the voting agreements of our initial shareholders and the anchor investors, may make it more likely that we will consummate our initial business combination. Each public stockholder may elect to redeem its public shares irrespective of whether they vote for or against the proposed transaction. The anchor investors are not required to vote any of their public shares in favor of our initial business combination or for or against any other matter presented for a shareholder vote.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that in no event will we redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we are not subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules) or any greater net tangible asset or cash requirement which may be contained in the agreement relating to our initial business combination. For example, the proposed business combination may require: (i) cash consideration to be paid to the target or its owners, (ii) cash to be transferred to the target for working capital or other general corporate purposes or (iii) the retention of cash to satisfy other conditions in accordance with the terms of the proposed business combination. In the event the aggregate cash consideration we would be required to pay for all shares of Class A common stock that are validly submitted for redemption plus any amount required to satisfy cash conditions pursuant to the terms of the proposed business combination exceed the aggregate amount of cash available to us, we will not complete the business combination or redeem any shares, and all shares of Class A common stock submitted for redemption will be returned to the holders thereof.

Limitation on Redemption upon Completion of our Initial Business Combination if we Seek Stockholder Approval

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that a public stockholder, together with any affiliate of such stockholder or any other person with whom such stockholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from seeking redemption rights with respect to more than an aggregate of 15% of the shares sold in the IPO (the “Excess Shares”). We believe this restriction will discourage stockholders from accumulating large blocks of shares, and subsequent attempts by such holders to use their ability to exercise their redemption rights against a proposed business combination as a means to force us or our management to purchase their shares at a significant premium to the then-current market price or on other undesirable terms. Absent this provision, a public stockholder holding more than an aggregate of 15% of the shares sold in the IPO could threaten to exercise its redemption rights if such holder’s shares are not purchased by us or our management at a premium to the then-current market price or on other undesirable terms. By limiting our stockholders’ ability to redeem no more than 15% of the shares sold in the IPO, we believe we will limit the ability of a small group of stockholders to unreasonably attempt to block our ability to complete our business combination, particularly in connection with a business combination with a target that requires as a closing condition that we have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. However, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will not restrict our stockholders’ ability to vote all of their shares (including Excess Shares) for or against our business combination.


Tendering Stock Certificates in Connection with a Tender Offer or Redemption Rights

We may require our public stockholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights, whether they are record holders or hold their shares in “street name,” to either tender their certificates to our transfer agent before the date set forth in the tender offer documents, or up to two business days before the vote on the proposal to approve the business combination in the event we distribute proxy materials, or to deliver their shares to the transfer agent electronically using the Depository Trust Company’s DWAC (Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian) System, at the holder’s option. The tender offer or proxy materials, as applicable, that we will furnish to holders of our public shares in connection with our initial business combination will indicate whether we are requiring public stockholders to satisfy such delivery requirements. Accordingly, a public stockholder would have from the time we send out our tender offer materials until the close of the tender offer period, or up to two days before the vote on the business combination if we distribute proxy materials, as applicable, to tender its shares if it wishes to seek to exercise its redemption rights. Given the relatively short exercise period, it is advisable for stockholders to use electronic delivery of their public shares.

There is a nominal cost associated with the above-referenced tendering process and the act of certificating the shares or delivering them through the DWAC System. The transfer agent will typically charge the tendering broker $80.00 and it would be up to the broker whether or not to pass this cost on to the redeeming holder. However, this fee would be incurred regardless of whether or not we require holders seeking to exercise redemption rights to tender their shares. The need to deliver shares is a requirement of exercising redemption rights regardless of the timing of when such delivery must be effectuated.

The foregoing is different from the procedures used by many blank check companies. In order to perfect redemption rights in connection with their business combinations, many blank check companies would distribute proxy materials for the stockholders’ vote on an initial business combination, and a holder could simply vote against a proposed business combination and check a box on the proxy card indicating such holder was seeking to exercise his or her redemption rights. After the business combination was approved, the company would contact such stockholder to arrange for him or her to deliver his or her certificate to verify ownership. As a result, the stockholder then had an “option window” after the completion of the business combination during which he or she could monitor the price of the company’s stock in the market. If the price rose above the redemption price, he or she could sell his or her shares in the open market before actually delivering his or her shares to the company for cancellation. As a result, the redemption rights, to which stockholders were aware they needed to commit before the stockholder meeting, would become “option” rights surviving past the completion of the business combination until the redeeming holder delivered its certificate. The requirement for physical or electronic delivery before the meeting ensures that a redeeming holder’s election to redeem is irrevocable once the business combination is approved.

Any request to redeem such shares, once made, may be withdrawn at any time up to the date set forth in the tender offer materials or the date of the stockholder meeting set forth in our proxy materials, as applicable. Furthermore, if a holder of a public share delivered its certificate in connection with an election of redemption rights and subsequently decides before the applicable date not to elect to exercise such rights, such holder may simply request that the transfer agent return the certificate (physically or electronically). It is anticipated that the funds to be distributed to holders of our public shares electing to redeem their shares will be distributed promptly after the completion of our business combination.

If our initial business combination is not approved or completed for any reason, then our public stockholders who elected to exercise their redemption rights would not be entitled to redeem their shares for the applicable pro rata share of the trust account. In such case, we will promptly return any certificates delivered by public holders who elected to redeem their shares.


If our initial proposed business combination is not completed, we may continue to try to complete a business combination with a different target until 12 months (or until 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO.

Redemption of Public Shares and Liquidation if no Initial Business Combination

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we will have only 12 months from the closing of the IPO to complete our initial business combination. If we anticipate that we may not be able to consummate our initial business combination within 12 months, we may, but are not obligated to, extend the period of time to consummate a business combination two times by an additional three months each time (for a total of up to 18 months to complete a business combination); provided that our Sponsor, as defined below (or its designees) must deposit into the trust account funds equal to one percent (1%) of the gross proceeds of the offering (including such proceeds from the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option) for each 3-month extension of the time period to complete our initial business combination (the “Additional Funds”), in exchange for a non-interest bearing, unsecured promissory note. However, if we filed a proxy statement, registration statement or similar filing for an initial business combination within the initial 12-month period, we may extend the period of time to consummate a business combination by three months (or up to 15 months to complete a business combination) without depositing the Additional Funds. If we are unable to complete our business combination within such prescribed time period, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the trust account (less up to $100,000 of interest released to us to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our Board, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. There will be no redemption rights or liquidating distributions with respect to our warrants, which will expire worthless if we fail to complete our business combination within the prescribed time period.

Holders of our founder shares will not be entitled to rights to liquidating distributions from the trust account with respect to the founder shares held by them if we fail to complete our initial business combination within 12 months (or up to 18 months, as applicable) from the closing of the IPO. However, if our sponsor, officers, directors, or the anchor investors acquire public shares in or after the IPO, they will be entitled to liquidating distributions from the trust account with respect to such public shares if we fail to complete our initial business combination within the allotted 12-month time period (or up to 18-month time period, as applicable). Our sponsor, officers and directors have agreed, pursuant to a letter agreement with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that would modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO, unless we provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their shares of Class A common stock upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the trust account divided by the number of then outstanding public shares. However, we may not redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 upon completion of our initial business combination (so that we are not subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules). If this optional redemption right is exercised with respect to an excessive number of public shares such that we cannot satisfy the net tangible asset requirement (described above) we would not proceed with the amendment or the related redemption of our public shares.


All costs and expenses associated with implementing our plan of dissolution, as well as payments to any creditors, have been funded from amounts remaining out of the approximately $600,000 of proceeds held outside the trust account, although we cannot assure you that there will be sufficient funds for such purpose. However, if those funds are not sufficient to cover the costs and expenses associated with implementing our plan of dissolution, to the extent that there is any interest accrued in the trust account not required to pay franchise and income taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the trust account on interest income earned on the trust account balance, we may request the trustee to release to us an amount of up to $100,000 of such accrued interest to pay those costs and expenses. As of March 28, 2022, we have not requested the trustee to release any funds.

If we were to expend all of the net proceeds of the IPO and the sale of the private placement warrants, other than the proceeds deposited in the trust account, and without taking into account interest, if any, earned on the trust account, the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders upon our dissolution would be approximately $10.10.

The proceeds deposited in the trust account could, however, become subject to the claims of our creditors which would have higher priority than the claims of our public stockholders. We cannot assure you that the actual per-share redemption amount received by stockholders will not be substantially less than $10.10. Under Section 281(b) of the DGCL, our plan of dissolution must provide for all claims against us to be paid in full or make provision for payments to be made in full, as applicable, if there are sufficient assets. These claims must be paid or provided for before we make any distribution of our remaining assets to our stockholders. While we intend to pay such amounts, if any, we cannot assure you that we will have funds sufficient to pay or provide for all creditors’ claims.

Although we will seek to have all vendors, service providers (other than our independent auditors), prospective target businesses or other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest and claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the trust account for the benefit of our public stockholders, there is no guarantee that they will execute such agreements or even if they execute such agreements that they would be prevented from bringing claims against the trust account including but not limited to fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver, in each case in order to gain an advantage with respect to a claim against our assets, including the funds held in the trust account. If any third party refuses to execute an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held in the trust account, our management will perform an analysis of the alternatives available to it and will only enter into an agreement with a third party that has not executed a waiver if management believes that such third party’s engagement would be significantly more beneficial to us than any alternative. Examples of possible instances where we may engage a third party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third party consultant whose particular expertise or skills are believed by management to be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver.

In addition, there is no guarantee that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the trust account for any reason. Our sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a third party (other than our independent auditors) for services rendered or products sold to us, or a prospective target business with which we have discussed entering into a transaction agreement, reduce the amount of funds in the trust account to below (i) $10.10 per public share or (ii) such lesser amount per public share held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account, due to reductions in value of the trust assets, in each case net of the amount of interest which may be withdrawn to pay taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the trust account, except as to any claims by a third party who executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the trust account and except as to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of the IPO against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. If an executed waiver is deemed to be unenforceable against a third party, then our sponsor will not be responsible to the extent of any liability for such third party claims Our sponsor does not have sufficient funds to satisfy its indemnity obligations and our sponsor’s only assets are securities of our company. We have not asked our sponsor to reserve for such indemnification obligations. Therefore, we cannot assure you that our sponsor would be able to satisfy those obligations. As a result, if any such claims were successfully made against the trust account, the funds available for our initial business combination and redemptions could be reduced to less than $10.10 per public share. In such event, we may not be able to complete our initial business combination, and you would receive such lesser amount per share in connection with any redemption of your public shares. None of our officers will indemnify us for claims by third parties including, without limitation, claims by vendors and prospective target businesses.


If the proceeds in the trust account are reduced below (i) $10.10 per public share or (ii) such lesser amount per public share held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account, due to reductions in value of the trust assets, in each case net of the amount of interest which may be withdrawn to pay taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the trust account, and our sponsor asserts that it is unable to satisfy its indemnification obligations or that it has no indemnification obligations related to a particular claim, our independent directors would determine whether to take legal action against our sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations. While we currently expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf against our sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their business judgment may choose not to do so if, for example, the cost of such legal action is deemed by the independent directors to be too high relative to the amount recoverable or if the independent directors determine that a favorable outcome is not likely. We have not asked our sponsor to reserve for such indemnification obligations and we cannot assure you that our sponsor would be able to satisfy those obligations. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that due to claims of creditors the actual value of the per-share redemption price will not be less than $10.10 per public share.

We will seek to reduce the possibility that our sponsor will have to indemnify the trust account due to claims of creditors by endeavoring to have all vendors, service providers (other than our independent auditors), prospective target businesses or other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to monies held in the trust account. Our sponsor will also not be liable as to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of the IPO against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. We will have access to up to approximately $600,000 from the proceeds of the IPO with which to pay any such potential claims (including costs and expenses incurred in connection with our liquidation, currently estimated to be no more than approximately $100,000). If we liquidate, and it is subsequently determined that the reserve for claims and liabilities is insufficient, stockholders who received funds from our trust account could be liable for claims made by creditors. If our offering expenses exceeded our estimate of $900,000, we would fund such excess with funds from the funds not to be held in the trust account. In such case, the amount of funds we intend to be held outside the trust account would decrease by a corresponding amount. Conversely, since the offering expenses of $576,438 are less than our estimate of $900,000, the amount of funds we intend to be held outside the trust account will increase by a corresponding amount.

Under the DGCL, stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against a corporation to the extent of distributions received by them in a dissolution. The pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares in the event we do not complete our business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO may be considered a liquidating distribution under Delaware law. If the corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in Section 280 of the DGCL intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision for all claims against it, including a 60-day notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought against the corporation, a 90-day period during which the corporation may reject any claims brought, and an additional 150-day waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution.


Furthermore, if the pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares in the event we do not complete our business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO, is not considered a liquidating distribution under Delaware law and such redemption distribution is deemed to be unlawful, then pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL, the statute of limitations for claims of creditors could then be six years after the unlawful redemption distribution, instead of three years, as in the case of a liquidating distribution. If we are unable to complete our business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the trust account (less up to $100,000 of interest released to us to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our Board, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. Accordingly, it is our intention to redeem our public shares as soon as reasonably possible following our 24th month and, therefore, we do not intend to comply with those procedures. As such, our stockholders could potentially be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received by them (but no more) and any liability of our stockholders may extend well beyond the third anniversary of such date.

Because we will not be complying with Section 280, Section 281(b) of the DGCL requires us to adopt a plan, based on facts known to us at such time that will provide for our payment of all existing and pending claims or claims that may be potentially brought against us within the subsequent 10 years. However, because we are a blank check company, rather than an operating company, and our operations will be limited to searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from our vendors (such as lawyers, investment bankers, etc.) or prospective target businesses. As described above, pursuant to the obligation contained in our underwriting agreement, we will seek to have all vendors, service providers (other than our independent auditors), prospective target businesses or other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the trust account. As a result of this obligation, the claims that could be made against us are significantly limited and the likelihood that any claim that would result in any liability extending to the trust account is remote. Further, our sponsor may be liable only to the extent necessary to ensure that the amounts in the trust account are not reduced below (i) $10.10 per public share or (ii) such lesser amount per public share held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account, due to reductions in value of the trust assets, in each case net of the amount of interest withdrawn to pay taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the trust account and will not be liable as to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of the IPO against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. If an executed waiver is deemed to be unenforceable against a third party, our sponsor will not be responsible to the extent of any liability for such third-party claims.

If we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of our stockholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, we cannot assure you we will be able to return $10.10 per share to our public stockholders. Additionally, if we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy court could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our stockholders. Furthermore, our Board may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, thereby exposing itself and our company to claims of punitive damages, by paying public stockholders from the trust account before addressing the claims of creditors. We cannot assure you that claims will not be brought against us for these reasons.


Our public stockholders will be entitled to receive funds from the trust account only (i) in the event of the redemption of our public shares if we do not complete our business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO, subject to applicable law, (ii) in connection with a stockholder vote to approve an amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation (a) to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we have not consummated an initial business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO or (b) relating to any other provisions relating to stockholders’ rights or pre-initial business combination activity, or (iii) our completion of an initial business combination, and then only in connection with those shares of our common stock that such stockholder properly elected to redeem, subject to the limitations. In no other circumstances will a stockholder have any right or interest of any kind to or in the trust account. In the event we seek stockholder approval in connection with our initial business combination, a stockholder’s voting in connection with the business combination alone will not result in a stockholder’s redeeming its shares to us for an applicable pro rata share of the trust account. Such stockholder must have also exercised its redemption rights as described above.

Competition

In identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business for our business combination, we may encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including other blank check companies, private equity groups and leveraged buyout funds, and operating businesses seeking strategic acquisitions. Many of these entities are well established and have extensive experience identifying and effecting business combinations directly or through affiliates. Moreover, many of these competitors possess greater financial, technical, human and other resources than we do. Our ability to acquire larger target businesses will be limited by our available financial resources. This inherent limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of a target business. Furthermore, our obligation to pay cash in connection with our public stockholders who exercise their redemption rights may reduce the resources available to us for our initial business combination and our outstanding warrants, and the future dilution they potentially represent, may not be viewed favorably by certain target businesses. Either of these factors may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating an initial business combination.

Facilities

Our shared executive offices are located at 4550 Post Oak Place Dr., Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77027, and our telephone number is (713) 820-6300. We consider our current office space adequate for our current operations.

Employees

We currently have two officers. We have no paid employees. Members of our management team are not obligated to devote any specific number of hours to our matters, but they intend to devote as much of their time as they deem necessary to our affairs until we have completed our initial business combination. The amount of time that any such person will devote in any time period will vary based on whether a target business has been selected for our initial business combination and the current stage of the business combination process.

Periodic Reporting and Financial Information

We will register our units, Class A common stock and warrants under the Exchange Act and have reporting obligations, including the requirement that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with the SEC. In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, our annual reports will contain financial statements audited and reported on by our independent registered public accountants.

We will provide stockholders with audited financial statements of the prospective target business as part of the tender offer materials or proxy solicitation materials sent to stockholders to assist them in assessing the target business. In all likelihood, these financial statements will need to be prepared in accordance with GAAP. We cannot assure you that any particular target business selected by us as a potential acquisition candidate will have financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP or that the potential target business will be able to prepare its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. To the extent that this requirement cannot be met, we may not be able to acquire the proposed target business. While this may limit the pool of potential acquisition candidates, we do not believe that this limitation will be material.

We will be required to evaluate our internal control procedures for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022 as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Only if we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer or an accelerated filer will we be required to have our internal control procedures audited. A target company may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of their internal controls. The development of the internal controls of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete any such acquisition.


Legal Proceedings

There is no material litigation, arbitration or governmental proceeding currently pending against us or any members of our management team in their capacity as such.

ItemITEM 1A. Risk Factors.

Summary Risk Factors

We are a newly formed company that has conducted no operations and has generated no revenues. Until we complete our initial business combination, we will have no operations and will generate no operating revenues. In making your decision whether to invest in our securities, you should take into account not only the background of our management team, but also the special risks we face as a blank check company. Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those highlighted in the section titled “Risk Factors” immediately following this summary. These risks include, among others, the following:

Risks Relating to a Business Combination and Post Business Combination Risks

We are a newly formed company with no operating history and no revenues.
Our public stockholders may not be afforded an opportunity to vote on our proposed business combination.
If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, our sponsor and the anchor investors have agreed to vote any founder shares held by them in favor of such initial business combination.
Your only opportunity to affect the investment decision regarding a potential business combination may be limited to the exercise of your right to redeem your shares from us for cash.
The ability of our public stockholders to redeem their shares for cash may make our financial condition unattractive to potential business combination targets.
The ability of our public stockholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares may not allow us to complete the most desirable business combination.
The ability of our public stockholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares could increase the probability that our initial business combination would be unsuccessful.
The requirement that we complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame may give potential target businesses leverage over us.
We may not be able to complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame.

 

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates may elect to purchase shares or public warrants from public stockholders.

Risk Factors

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to develop and maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and materially and adversely affect our business and operating results, and we may face litigation as a result.


If a stockholder fails to receive notice of our offer to redeem our public shares in connection with our business combination, such shares may not be redeemed.

You will not have any rights or interests in funds from the trust account.
NASDAQ may delist our securities from trading on its exchange.
Shareholders will not be entitled to protections normally afforded to investors of many other blank check companies.
If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, you may lose the ability to redeem all such shares in excess of 15% of our Class A common stock.
As the number of special purpose acquisition companies evaluating targets increases, attractive targets may become scarcer.
Changes in the market for directors and officers liability insurance could make it more difficult and more expensive for us to negotiate and complete an initial business combination.

Our search for a business combination may be materially adversely affected by COVID-19.
Because of our limited resources and the significant competition for business combination opportunities, it may be more difficult for us to complete our initial business combination.
Because of our limited resources and the significant competition for business combination opportunities, it may be more difficult for us to complete our initial business combination.
We may be unable to complete our initial business combination, in which case our public stockholders may only receive $10.10 per share.
We may depend on loans from our sponsor or management team to fund our search for a business combination.

After the completion of our initial business combination, we may be required to take write-downs or write-offs.
If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced.
Our independent directors may decide not to enforce the indemnification obligations of our sponsor.
We may not have sufficient funds to satisfy indemnification claims of our directors and executive officers.
We and our board may be exposed to claims of punitive damages.
Claims of creditors in such proceeding may have priority over the claims of our stockholders and the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our stockholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.
We may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities may be restricted.
Changes in laws or regulations may adversely affect our business.
Our stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against us .
We may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders until after the consummation of our initial business combination.


We are not registering the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants under the Securities Act.
The grant of registration rights to our initial stockholders and the anchor investors may make it more difficult to complete our initial business combination.
We ratified certain action pursuant to Section 204 of the DGCL and filed a Certificate of Validation.
Because we are not limited to a particular industry, you will be unable to ascertain the merits or risks of any particular target business’ operations.
Because we intend to seek a business combination with a target business in the energy industry in North America, we expect our future operations to be subject to risks associated with this sector.
Past performance by our management team and members of our Board may not be indicative of future performance of an investment in us.
We may seek acquisition opportunities in industries or sectors which may or may not be outside of our management’s area of expertise.
We may enter into our initial business combination with a target that does not meet certain criteria and guidelines.
We may seek acquisition opportunities with an early stage company.
We are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm.
Our independent registered public accounting firm’s report contains an explanatory paragraph that expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a “going concern.”
We may issue additional shares of common stock or preferred stock to complete our initial business combination and may issue shares of common stock or preferred stock under an employee incentive plan.
Resources could be wasted in researching acquisitions that are not completed.


Risks Relating to our Sponsor and Management Team

We are dependent upon our officers and directors, and their loss could adversely affect our ability to operate. We are dependent upon the efforts of members of our management team.
Members of our management team may negotiate employment or consulting agreements with a target business in connection with a particular business combination.
We may have a limited ability to assess the management of a prospective target business.
Our officers and directors may allocate their time to other businesses, thereby causing conflicts of interest in their determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs.
Certain of our officers and directors may in become affiliated with entities engaged in business activities similar to those intended to be conducted by us.
Our officers, directors, security holders and their respective affiliates may have competitive pecuniary interests that conflict with our interests.
We may engage in a business combination with one or more target businesses that have relationships with entities that may be affiliated with our sponsor, officers, directors or existing holders.
We may not have an audit committee consisting entirely of independent directors for up to a year following our initial public offering.
A conflict of interest may arise in determining whether a particular business combination target is appropriate.
Our officers and directors could potentially make a substantial profit even if we acquire a target business that subsequently declines in value.
We may issue notes or other debt securities, or otherwise incur substantial debt.
We may only be able to complete one business combination with the proceeds of the IPO and the sale of the private placement warrants, which will cause us to be solely dependent on a single business.
We may attempt to simultaneously complete business combinations with multiple prospective targets.
We may attempt to complete our initial business combination with a private company about which little information is available.
Our management may not be able to maintain control of a target business after our initial business combination.
We do not have a specified maximum redemption threshold.
Unlike many blank check companies, our balance sheet reflects negative stockholders’ equity.


We may seek to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation in a manner that will make it easier for us to complete our initial business combination but that our stockholders may not support.
The provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that relate to our pre-business combination activity may be amended with the approval of holders of 65% of our common stock.
We may be unable to obtain additional financing to complete our initial business combination or to fund the operations and growth of a target business.
Our initial stockholders may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a stockholder vote,.
We may amend the terms of the warrants in a manner that may be adverse to holders of public warrants with the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants.
We may redeem your unexpired warrants before their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to you.
Our warrants and founder shares may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A common stock and make it more difficult to complete our business combination.
The units may be worth less than units of other special purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs.
Our warrant agreement may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial business combination.

Risks Relating to our Securities

We may lose the ability to complete an otherwise advantageous initial business combination.

There is increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, lenders, customers and other market participants with respect to our Environmental, Social and Governance, or ESG

We are an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company.
Compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may make it more difficult for us to complete our initial business combination.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover of us.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees or agents.
Cyber incidents could result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/or loss.
An investment may result in uncertain or adverse United States federal income tax consequences.

If we complete our initial business combination with a company with operations or opportunities outside of the United States, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks.


Risk Factors

Our business involves significant risks, some of which are described below. You should carefully consider these risks, in addition to the other information contained in this Annual Report, on Form 10-K, including our financial statements and related notes and the section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The occurrence of any of the events or developments described in the following risk factors and the risks described elsewhere in this Annual Report could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and the trading price of our securities. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. This Annual Report on Form 10-K also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of factors that are described in the following risk factors and the risks described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.

 

Risks RelatingThe following risk factors apply to our Search for, Consummationbusiness and operations. These risk factors are not exhaustive, and investors are encouraged to perform their own investigation with respect to the business, financial condition and prospects of our business, financial condition and prospects. You should carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to the other information included in this Report, including matters addressed in the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” We may face additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to us, or Inabilitythat we currently deem immaterial, which may also impair our business or financial condition. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes to Consummate, a Business Combination and Post Business Combination Risksthe financial statements included herein.

Risks Related to Our Business, Operations and Industry

Our commercial success depends on our ability to develop and operate production facilities for the commercial production of renewable gasoline.

Our business strategy includes growth primarily through the construction and development of commercial production facilities, including the development of our first commercial production facility which we expect to support first commercial production of renewable gasoline as early as 2026. This strategy depends on our ability to successfully construct and complete commercial production facilities on favorable terms and on our expected schedule, obtain the necessary permits, governmental approvals and carbon credit qualifications needed to operate our commercial production facilities and identify and evaluate development and partnership opportunities to expand our business. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully develop any commercial production facilities, obtain necessary approval, qualifications and permits necessary to operate, identify new opportunities and develop new technologies and commercial production facilities, or establish and maintain our relationships with key strategic partners. In addition, we will compete with other companies for these development opportunities, which may increase our costs. We also expect to achieve growth through the expansion of our in-process projects as the facilities are expanded or otherwise begin to produce renewable gasoline, but we cannot assure you that we will be able to reach or renew the necessary agreements to complete these commercial production facilities or expansions. If we are unable to successfully identify and consummate future commercial production facility opportunities or complete or expand our planned commercial production facilities, it will impede our ability to execute our growth strategy.

There is no assurance that our JDA with Cottonmouth Ventures, a newly formed companysubsidiary of Diamondback, will result in a FID to proceed and/or entry into final definitive agreements with respect to the proposed project in the Permian Basin. Likewise, there is no assurance our CDMA with CTV JV will result in a FID to proceed and/or entry into final definitive agreements with respect to the Kern County project. In both circumstances, we will be required to expend development costs prior to such determination, which costs we will not recoup if such project(s) do(es) not proceed.


Our ability to develop and operate commercial production facilities, as well as expand production at future commercial production facilities, is subject to many risks beyond our control, including:

regulatory changes that affect the value of renewable fuels including changes to existing federal RFS program or state level low-carbon fuel credit systems, which could have a significant effect on the financial performance of our commercial production facilities and the number of potential projects with attractive economics;

technological risks, including technological advances or changes in production methods that may render our technologies and products obsolete or uneconomical, delaying or failing to adapt or incorporate technological advances, new standards or production technologies that may require us to make significant expenditures to replace or modify our operations, and challenges in obtaining, implementing or financing any new technologies;

competition from other carbon-based and non-carbon-based fuel producers that may have greater resources than us;

changes in energy commodity prices, such as crude oil and natural gas as well as wholesale electricity prices, which could have a significant effect on our revenues and expenses;

changes in quality standards or other regulatory changes that may limit our ability to produce renewable gasoline or increase the costs of processing renewable gasoline;

changes in the broader waste collection industry or changes to environmental regulations governing the industry, including changes affecting the waste collection and biogas potential of the landfill industry, which could limit the renewable fuel feedstock that we currently target for our commercial production facilities;

substantial construction risks, including the risk of delay, that may arise due to forces outside of our control, including those related to engineering and environmental problems, changes in laws and regulations and inclement weather and labor disruptions;

the ability to establish and maintain our relationships with key strategic partners, on favorable terms or at all;

disruptions in sales, productions, service or other business activities or our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel;

operating risks and the effect of disruptions on our business, including the effects of global health crises or pandemics (such as COVID-19), weather conditions, catastrophic events such as fires, explosions, earthquakes, droughts and acts of terrorism, and other force majeure events on us, our customers, suppliers, distributors and subcontractors;

accidents involving personal injury or the loss of life;

entering into markets where we have less experience than our competitors;

challenges arising from our ability to recruit and retain key personnel;

the ability to obtain financing for a commercial production facility on acceptable terms or at all and the need for substantially more capital than initially budgeted to complete a commercial production facility and exposure to liabilities as a result of unforeseen environmental, construction, technological or other complications;

failures or delays in obtaining desired or necessary land rights, including ownership, leases, easements, zoning rights or building permits;


global and regional macroeconomic conditions, such as high inflation, high interest rates, changes to monetary policy, and military hostilities in multiple geographies (including the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia and the conflict in the Middle East);

a decrease in the availability, pricing or timeliness of delivery of raw materials and components, necessary for the commercial production facilities to function;

obtaining and keeping in good standing permits, authorizations and consents (including environmental and operating permits) from local city, county, state or U.S. federal governments as well as local and U.S. federal governmental organizations;

difficulties in identifying, obtaining and permitting suitable sites for new commercial production facilities; and

identifying potential customers for our products or entering into contracts to sell our products on favorable terms.

Any of these factors could prevent us from developing, operating or expanding our commercial production facilities, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. 

Our limited history, lack of revenue and no revenues, and you have no basis on whichlimited liquidity makes it difficult to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective.and prospects and may increase the risks associated with your investment.

We arewere formed in 2020 and although our core syngas-to-gasoline technology has been developed and tested for over thirteen years, we have not produced gasoline on a newly formed company with no operating results. Becauselarge-scale, commercial level. As a result, we lack anhave a limited operating history you have no basis upon which to evaluate our business and future prospects, which subjects us to a number of risks and uncertainties, including our ability to achieveplan for and predict future growth. Following the acquisition of the patented STG+® process and demonstration facility with over 10,500 historical operating hours, we have continued to focus on commercial scale production of on-spec renewable gasoline from renewable feedstocks. The reactor designs, gas velocity, process configurations, and control system of the demonstration facility are representative of a full-scale syngas-to-gasoline production facility. We have also participated in carbon lifecycle studies to validate the CI score and reduced lifecycle carbon emissions of our renewable gasoline as well as fuel testing studies to validate the specification and performance of our gasoline product.

Since the acquisition of the STG+® technology in 2020, we have made progress towards constructing our first commercial production facility, including more recently focusing on our development of projects that we believe have quicker paths to commercial operations such as our joint project in the Permian Basin. While we have not abandoned the Maricopa, Arizona project, we anticipate the project in the Permian Basin to be our first commercial production facility.

We have encountered and expect to continue to encounter risks and difficulties experienced by growing companies in rapidly developing and changing industries, including challenges related to achieving market acceptance of our renewable fuel, competing against companies with greater financial and technical resources, competing against entrenched incumbent competitors that have long-standing relationships with our prospective customers in the commercial renewable fuels market, recruiting and retaining qualified employees, and making use of our limited resources. We cannot ensure that we will be successful in addressing these and other challenges that we may face in the future, and our business objectivemay be adversely affected if we do not manage these risks appropriately. As a result, we may not attain sufficient revenue (if any) to achieve or maintain positive cash flow from operations or profitability in any given future period, if at all.

To date, we have not generated any revenue. We do not expect to generate any meaningful revenue unless and until we are able to commercialize our first production facility. Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses, have an accumulated deficit of completing$23.9 million as of December 31, 2023, and negative operating cash flow during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. Management expects that operating losses and negative cash flows may increase because of additional costs and expenses related to the development of technology and the development of market and strategic relationships with other companies. Our continued solvency is dependent upon our initial business combination with one or more target businesses.ability to obtain additional working capital to complete our product development and to successfully achieve commerciality of our projects.


Following the Business Combination and the closing of the PIPE Financing, we have used and expect to continue to use cash on hand to fund our ongoing operations and R&D activities. As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately $28.8 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand. We believe that based on our current level of operating expenses and currently available cash on hand, we will have sufficient funds available to cover R&D activities and operating cash needs through 2024. However, as we have not yet developed a commercial production facility and have no plans, arrangements or understandings with any prospective target business concerning a business combination andmeaningful revenue to date, we may require additional funds in future years. Our ability to raise funds through equity offerings may be limited by the significant number of shares that may be publicly sold.

We may be unable to qualify for existing federal and state level low-carbon fuel credits and other carbon credits and the carbon credit markets may not develop as quickly or efficiently as we anticipate or at all.

The continued development of carbon credit marketplaces will be crucial for our success, as we expect carbon credits (including, for example, the RFS for the D3 RIN and various state carbon programs such as California’s LCFS) to be a significant source of future revenue. The efficiency and integrity of the voluntary carbon credit market is currently subject to pressures and scrutiny relating to a number of factors including insufficiency of credit demand, the risk that carbon credits could be counted multiple times, concerns regarding the additionality or permanence of climate benefits that the credits represent, lack of standardization of and concerns regarding the integrity of credit verification. Additionally, such forces could put negative pressure on the value of voluntary carbon credits or otherwise make it more difficult to monetize any climate benefits that may be associated with our products. More broadly, the value of products produced using our process technologies may be dependent on the value of carbon credits which may fluctuate based on these market forces relevant to regulatory carbon markets or voluntary carbon markets. Under the current RFS regulations, renewable gasoline produced from separated yard waste, crop residue, slash, and pre-commercial thinnings, biogenic components of separated municipal solid waste, cellulosic components of separated food waste, and cellulosic components of annual cover crops through a gasification and upgrading process qualifies for D3 RINs. We intend for our commercial production facilities to utilize gasification and upgrading to produce renewable gasoline from one or more of these feedstocks. Accordingly, we believe that the renewable gasoline produced by our commercial production facilities will qualify for D3 RINs and intend to register with EPA as a producer of RINs prior to the commercial operation of our first commercial production facility. However, if our renewable gasoline is unable to qualify under the RFS for the D3 RIN and various state carbon programs, or for the generation of quality voluntary carbon credits that can be sold on registries preferred by consumers, or if changes to regulatory or voluntary standards otherwise limit the potential for such qualification, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted. Delayed development of carbon credit markets, as well as any decline in the value of carbon credits or other incentives associated with products produced using our process technologies, could also negatively impact the commercial viability of our commercial production facilities and could limit the growth of the business and adversely impact our financial condition and future results. There is a risk that the supply of low-carbon alternative materials and products outstrips demand, resulting in the value of carbon credits declining. Any decline in the value of carbon credits or other incentives associated with products produced using our process technologies could harm our results of operations, cash flow and financial condition. The value of carbon credits and other incentives may also be adversely affected by legislative, agency, or judicial determinations.

Significant capital investment is required to develop and conduct our operations and we intend to raise additional funds through debt financing for our planned operations and these funds may not be available when needed.

The construction and development of our proposed commercial production facilities requires substantial capital investment. We intend to fund approximately 70% of such capital in the future through debt financing, which may include project financing, industrial revenue bonds, pollution control bonds or some other combination. While we have been in discussions with banks and other credit counterparties regarding project financing, industrial revenue bonds, or pollution control bonds, and these discussions have led to indications of debt financing equivalent to 70% of our expected capital expenditure requirements, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such financing. If we are unable to obtain debt financing on favorable terms or at all, our development timeline may be delayed and would require raising of additional equity or debt capital.

Additionally, we may raise additional funds through the issuance of equity, equity-related or debt securities, through obtaining credit from government or financial institutions or by engaging in joint ventures or other alternative forms of financing. We cannot be certain that additional funds will be available on favorable terms when required, or at all. If we cannot raise additional funds when needed, our financial condition, results of operations, business and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. If we raise funds through the issuance of debt securities or through loan arrangements, the terms of such debt securities or loan arrangements could require significant interest payments, contain covenants that restrict our business, or contain other unfavorable terms. The current high interest rate environment adds additional risk and expense to the use of debt to fund capital investment. In addition, to the extent we raise funds through the sale of additional equity securities, our stockholders would experience additional dilution.


In order to construct new commercial production facilities, we typically face a long and variable design, fabrication, and construction development cycle that requires significant resource commitments and may create fluctuations in whether and when any revenue is recognized, and may have an adverse effect on our business.

The development, design and construction process for our commercial production facilities generally lasts from 24 to 36 months, on average. Prior to constructing and developing a commercial production facility, we typically conduct a preliminary review and assess whether the commercial production facility is commercially viable based on our expected return on investment, investment payback period, and other operating metrics, as well as the necessary permits to develop such commercial production facility. This extended development process requires the dedication of significant time and resources from our management team, with no certainty of success or recovery of our expenses. Further, upon commencement of operations, we expect it may take six months or longer for the commercial production facility to ramp up to our expected production level. All of these factors, and in particular, increased spending that is not offset by anticipated increased revenues, can contribute to fluctuations in our quarterly financial performance and increase the likelihood that our operating results in a particular period will fall below investor expectations.

Our business will require suitable tracts of real property upon which to construct and operate the specialized equipment supporting our commercial production facilities. We anticipate that such tracts of real property will be predominantly leased from third parties under long-term land leases, but it is possible that some of such tracts may be purchased by us. If we are unable to identify such suitable tracts of real property, or if we are unable to purchase or lease such tracts at commercially reasonable rates and under terms favorable to us, our business may be adversely affected.

The construction and operation of the equipment supporting our commercial production facilities sales may require specialized permitting from applicable governmental authorities. We may be unable to obtain such specialized permitting, or we may experience significant delays in obtaining such specialized permitting, and this may delay our ability to launch these facilities for commercial operations, which may have a significant impact on any anticipated revenue and profitability.

The complexity, expense, and nature of customer procurement processes result in a lengthy customer acquisition and sales process. We anticipate that it may take us months to attract, obtain an award from, contract with, and recognize revenue from the production of renewable gasoline by a new commercial production facility, if we are successful at all.

We have entered into relatively new markets for renewables, including renewable natural gas, renewable gasoline and biofuel, and these new markets are highly volatile and have significant risk associated with current market conditions.

We have limited experience in marketing and selling renewable gasoline. As such, we may not be able to compete successfully with existing or new competitors in supplying renewable gasoline to potential customers. If we are unable to establish production and sales channels that allow us to offer comparable products at attractive prices, we may not be able to compete effectively in the market. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that our renewables business will ever generate significant revenues or maintain profitability. The failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Fluctuations in the price of product inputs, including renewable feedstocks, natural gas and other feedstocks, may affect our cost structure.

Our approach to the renewable fuels market will be dependent on the price of renewable feedstocks, such as biomass, as well as natural gas (including synthetic natural gas) and other feedstocks that will be used to produce our renewable gasoline. A decrease in the availability of feedstocks or an increase in the price may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results. At certain levels, prices may make these products uneconomical to use and produce as we may be unable to pass the full amount of feedstock cost increases on to our customers.

The price and availability of biomass, natural gas and other feedstocks may be influenced by general economic, market and regulatory factors. These factors include farming decisions, government policies and subsidies with respect to agriculture and international trade and global demand and supply. For example, renewable feedstock prices may increase significantly in response to increased demand for biomass for the production of competing renewable fuels. 


Fluctuations in petroleum prices and customer demand patterns may reduce demand for renewable fuels and bio-based chemicals and a prolonged environment of low petroleum prices or reduced demand for renewable fuels or biofuels could have a material adverse effect on our long-term business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Our renewable gasoline may be considered an alternative to petroleum-based fuels. Therefore, if the price of crude oil falls, any revenues that we generate from renewable gasoline could decline and we may be unable to produce products that are a commercially viable alternative to petroleum-based fuels. Additionally, demand for liquid transportation fuels, including renewable gasoline, may decrease due to economic conditions or other factors outside of our control, which could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

Long-term renewable fuels prices may fluctuate substantially due to factors outside of our control. The price of renewable fuels can vary significantly for many reasons, including: (i) increases and decreases in the number of internal combustion engines in operation in our markets; (ii) changes in competing liquid hydrocarbon technologies or fuel transportation capacity constraints or inefficiencies; (iii) energy or renewable fuel supply disruptions; (iv) weather conditions (which may be affected by climate change); (v) seasonal fluctuations; (vi) changes in consumer preferences and/or the demand for energy or in patterns of renewable fuel usage, including the potential development of demand-side management tools and practices; (vi) development of new fuels or new technologies for the production of renewable fuels; (vii) federal and state regulations; and (viii) then prevailing global and regional macroeconomic conditions.

We may face substantial competition from companies with greater resources and financial strength, which could adversely affect our performance and growth.

We may face substantial competition in the market for renewable fuel. Our competitors include companies in the incumbent petroleum-based industry as well as those in the emerging renewable fuels industry. The petroleum-based industry benefits from a large established infrastructure, production capability and business relationships. The greater resources and financial strength in this industry provide significant competitive advantages that we may not be able to overcome in a timely manner.

Our ability to compete successfully will depend on our ability to develop proprietary products that reach the market in a timely manner and are technologically superior to and/or are less expensive than other products on the market. Many of our competitors have substantially greater production, financial, research and development, personnel and marketing resources than we do. In addition, certain of our competitors may also benefit from local government subsidies and other incentives that are not available to us. As a result, our competitors may be able to develop competing and/or superior technologies and processes, and compete more aggressively and sustain that competition over a longer period of time than we could. Our technologies and products may be rendered obsolete or uneconomical by technological advances or entirely different approaches developed by one or more of our competitors. As more companies develop new intellectual property in our markets, the possibility of a competitor acquiring patent or other rights that may limit our business or operations increases, which could lead to litigation. Furthermore, to secure purchase agreements from certain customers, we may be required to enter into exclusive supply contracts, which could limit our ability to further expand our sales to new customers. Likewise, major potential customers may be locked into long-term, exclusive agreements with our competitors, which could inhibit our ability to compete for their business.

Our ability to compete successfully also depends on our ability to identify, hire, attract, train and develop and retain highly qualified personnel. We may not be able to recruit and hire a sufficient number of such personnel which may adversely affect our results of operations, sales capabilities and financial position. New hires require significant training and time before they achieve full productivity and the ability to attract, hire and retain them depends on our ability to provide competitive compensation. There is significant competition for personnel with strong sales skills and technical knowledge. We may be unable to hire or retain sufficient numbers of qualified individuals and such failure could adversely affect our business, including the execution of our proposed growth projects.


In addition, various governments have recently announced a number of spending programs focused on the development of clean technologies, including alternatives to petroleum-based fuels and the reduction of carbon emissions. Such spending programs could lead to increased funding for our competitors or a rapid increase in the number of competitors within those markets.

We also may face substantial competition as we develop our commercial production facilities and STG+® technology and seek to work with agricultural industry participants, commercial waste companies and landowners to source our renewable feedstocks, including biomass and MSW, as well as natural gas and other feedstocks and lease or acquire land to install and operate commercial production facilities. Our competitors include established companies and developers with significantly greater resources and financial strength, which may provide them with competitive advantages that we may not be able to overcome in a timely manner, or at all.

Our limited resources relative to many of our competitors may cause us to fail to anticipate or respond adequately to new developments and other competitive pressures. This failure could reduce our competitiveness and market share, adversely affect our results of operations and financial position and prevent us from obtaining or maintaining profitability. 

Our proposed growth projects may not be completed or, if completed, may not perform as expected and our project development activities may consume a significant portion of our management’s focus, and if not successful, reduce any anticipated profitability.

We plan to grow our business by building multiple commercial production facilities, including our first commercial STG+® based production facility in the United States, along with our additional planned and identified potential commercial production facilities. Development projects may require us to spend significant sums for engineering, permitting, legal, financial advisory and other expenses before we determine whether a development project is feasible, economically attractive or capable of being financed.

Our development projects are typically planned to be large and complex, and we may not be able to complete them. There can be no assurance that we will be able to negotiate the required agreements, overcome any local opposition, or obtain the necessary approvals, licenses, permits and financing. Failure to achieve any of these elements may prevent the development and construction of a project. If that were to occur, we could lose all of our investment in development expenditures and may be required to write-off project development assets.

We may not be able to develop, maintain and grow strategic relationships, identify new strategic relationship opportunities, or form strategic relationships, in the future.

We expect that our ability to establish, maintain, and manage strategic relationships, such as our relationships with Cottonmouth Ventures, CTV JV, InEnTec Inc. and EcoStrat Inc., could have a significant impact on the success of our business, although there can be no guarantee that these relationships will provide such impact. While we expect that our STG+® technology will enable us to become a more substantial operating entity in the future, there can be no assurance that we will be able to identify or secure suitable and scalable business relationship opportunities in the future or that our competitors will not capitalize on such opportunities before we do.

Additionally, we cannot guarantee that the companies with which we have developed or will develop strategic relationships will continue to devote the resources necessary to promote mutually beneficial business relationships and grow our business. Our current arrangements are not exclusive, and some of our strategic partners work with our competitors. If we are unsuccessful in establishing or maintaining our relationships with key strategic partners, our overall growth could be impaired, and our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results could be adversely affected.

We may acquire or invest in additional companies, which may divert our management’s attention, result in additional dilution to our stockholders, and consume resources that are necessary to sustain our business.

Although we have not made any acquisitions to date, our business strategy in the future may include acquiring other complementary products, technologies, or businesses. We also may enter relationships with other businesses to expand our operations and to create service networks to support our production and delivery of renewable gasoline. An acquisition, investment, or business relationship may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. We may encounter difficulties assimilating or integrating the businesses, technologies, products, services, personnel, or operations of the acquired companies particularly if the key personnel of the acquired companies choose not to work for us. Acquisitions may also disrupt our business, divert our resources, and require significant management attention that would otherwise be available for the development of our business. Moreover, the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, investment, or business relationship may not be realized or we may be exposed to unknown liabilities.


Negotiating these transactions can be time consuming, difficult, and expensive, and our ability to close these transactions may often be subject to approvals that are beyond our control. Consequently, these transactions, even if undertaken and announced, may not close. Even if we do successfully complete acquisitions, we may not ultimately strengthen our competitive position or achieve our goals, and any acquisitions we complete could be viewed negatively by our customers, securities analysts, and investors.

Fluctuations in the price and availability of energy to power our facilities may harm our performance.

We anticipate our commercial production facilities to use significant amounts of energy to produce our renewable gasoline. Accordingly, our business is dependent upon energy supplied by third parties. The prices and availability of energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions. These market conditions are affected by factors beyond our control, such as weather conditions, overall economic conditions and governmental regulations. Should the price of energy increase or should access to the required energy sources be unavailable, our business could suffer and have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. In addition, a lack of availability of sufficient amounts of renewable energy to effectively decarbonize our facilities could have a material impact on our business and results of operations. 

We may be subject to liabilities and losses that may not be covered by insurance.

Our employees and facilities are and will be subject to the hazards associated with producing renewable gasoline. Operating hazards can cause personal injury and loss of life, damage to, or destruction of, property, plant and equipment and environmental damage. We maintain insurance coverage in amounts against the risks that we believe are consistent with industry practice, and maintain a safety program. However, we could sustain losses for uninsurable or uninsured risks, or in amounts in excess of existing insurance coverage. Events that result in significant personal injury or damage to our property or to property owned by third parties or other losses that are not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.

Insurance liabilities are difficult to assess and quantify due to unknown factors, including the severity of an injury, the determination of our liability in proportion to other parties, the number of incidents not reported and the effectiveness of our safety program. If we were to experience insurance claims or costs above our coverage limits or that are not covered by our insurance, we might be required to use working capital to satisfy these claims rather than to maintain or expand our operations. To the extent that we experience a material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents or workers’ compensation claims, or unfavorable developments on existing claims, our operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

Renewable gasoline has not previously been used as a commercial fuel in significant amounts, its use subjects us to product liability risks and we may become subject to product liability claims, which could harm our financial condition and liquidity if we are not able to successfully defend or insure against such claims.

Renewable gasoline has not been used as a commercial fuel in large quantities or for a long period of time. Research regarding this product and its distribution infrastructure is ongoing. Although renewable gasoline has been tested on some engines, there is a risk that it may damage engines or otherwise fail to perform as expected. If renewable gasoline degrades the performance or reduces the life-cycle of engines, or causes them to fail to meet emissions standards, market acceptance could be slowed or stopped, and we could be subject to product liability claims. A significant product liability lawsuit could substantially impair our production efforts and could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition and results of operations.

While we intend to carry insurance for product liability, it is possible that our insurance coverage may not cover the full exposure on a product liability claim of significant magnitude. A successful product liability claim against us could require us to pay a substantial monetary award. A product liability claim could also generate substantial negative publicity about our business and operations and could have an adverse effect on our brand, business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.


Liabilities and costs associated with hazardous materials, contamination and other environmental conditions may require us to conduct investigations or remediation or expose us to other liabilities, both of which may adversely impact our operations and financial condition.

We may incur liabilities for the investigation and cleanup of any environmental contamination at our commercial production facilities, or at off-site locations where we arrange for the disposal of hazardous substances or wastes. For example, under CERCLA and other federal, state and local laws, certain broad categories of persons, including an owner or operator of a property, or businesses may become liable for costs of investigation and remediation, impacts to human health and for damages to natural resources. These laws often impose strict and joint and several liability without regard to fault or degree of contribution or whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release of such hazardous substances or whether the conduct giving rise to the release was legal at the time it occurred. We also may be subject to related claims by private parties, including employees, contractors, or the general public, alleging property damage and personal injury due to exposure to hazardous or other materials at or from those properties. We may incur substantial costs or other damages associated with these obligations, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, we rely on third parties to ensure compliance with certain environmental laws, including those relating to the disposal of wastes. Any failure to properly handle or dispose of wastes, regardless of whether such failure is ours or our contractors, could result in liability under environmental, health and safety laws. The costs of liability could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. 

Our operations, and future planned operations, are subject to certain environmental health and safety laws or permitting requirements, which could result in increased compliance costs or additional operating costs and restrictions. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations could result in substantial fines or other limitations that could adversely impact our financial results or operations.

Our operations, as well as our contractors, suppliers, and customers, are subject to certain federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, the generation, storage, transportation, and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. We or others in our supply chain may be required to obtain permits and comply with procedures that impose various restrictions and operations that could have adverse effects on our operations. If key permits and approvals cannot be obtained on acceptable terms, or if other operations requirements cannot be met in a manner satisfactory for our operations or on a timeline that meets our commercial obligations, it may adversely impact our business. There are also significant capital, operating and other costs associated with compliance with these environmental laws and regulations.

Environmental and health and safety laws and regulations are subject to change and may become more stringent over time, such as through new regulations enacted at the international, national, state, and/or local level or new or modified regulations that may be implemented under existing law. The nature and extent of any changes in these laws, rules, regulations, and permits could have material effects on our business. Future legislation and regulations or changes in existing legislation and regulations, or interpretations thereof, could cause additional expenditures, restrictions, and delays in connection with our operations as well as our other future projects.

Future changes to our operations, such as siting of new facilities or the implementation of manufacturing processes at our planned future facilities, could result in increased expenditures to comply with environmental laws, or to obtain and comply with pre-construction and operating permits. For example, federal siting requirements could require us to consider alternative sites for our manufacturing facilities or we could be subject to challenges from stakeholders regarding the use of land for such facilities, which could lead to delays or an inability to construct new facilities. Additionally, future planned operations may create regulated emissions which may require obtaining permits, adhering to permit limits, and/or the use of emissions control technology at our manufacturing facilities. Should permitted limits or other requirements applicable to our current or future operations change in the future, we may be required to install additional, more costly control technology to ensure continued compliance with environmental laws or permits. Any failure to comply with environmental laws could result in significant fines and penalties or business interruptions that could adversely impact our financial results or operations.

Transition risks related to climate change could have a material and adverse effects on us.

We are committed to a clean energy future and we believe our business is well-positioned to benefit from growing regulatory and policy support for decarbonization and other trends related to climate change. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that these developments may in the future adversely affect the business, our suppliers, and the demand for our product while supporting the development of competing technologies and energy sources. For example, the adoption of legislation or regulatory programs to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases (including carbon pricing schemes), or the adoption and implementation of regulations that require reporting of greenhouse gas emissions or other climate-related information, could adversely affect our business, including by requiring us or our suppliers to incur increased operating costs, stimulating demand for electric vehicles, restricting our ability to execute on our business strategy, reducing our access to financial markets, or creating greater potential for governmental investigations or litigation. See “Item 1. Business—Climate Change, Regulatory Mandates and Government Funding” for further discussion of the laws and regulations related to greenhouse gases and climate change. We could incur increased costs and compliance burden relating to the assessment and disclosure of climate-related risks. We may also face increased litigation risks related to disclosures made pursuant to the rule if finalized as proposed.


Increased focus on sustainability or other ESG matters could impact our operations and expose us to additional risks.

Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny from a variety of stakeholders, including investor advocacy groups, proxy advisory firms, certain institutional investors, and lenders, investment funds and other influential investors and rating agencies, related to their ESG and sustainability practices. The success of our business in part depends on customers and financial institutions viewing our business and operations as having a positive ESG profile. Increasing attention to, and societal expectations regarding, climate change, human rights, and other ESG topics may require us to make certain changes to our business operations to satisfy the expectations of customers and financial institutions. Additionally, our customers may be driven to purchase our fuel products due to their own sustainability or ESG commitments, which may entail holding their suppliers — including us — to ESG standards that go beyond compliance with laws and regulations and our ability to comply with such standards. Failure to maintain operations that align with such “beyond compliance” standards may negatively impact our reputation, cause potential customers to not do business with us or otherwise hurt demand for our products. More broadly, if we do not adapt to or comply with investor or other stakeholder expectations and standards on ESG matters as they continue to evolve, or if we are perceived to have not responded appropriately or quickly enough to growing concern for ESG and sustainability issues, regardless of whether there is a regulatory or legal requirement to do so, we may suffer from reputational damage and our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

In addition, growing interest on the part of stakeholders regarding sustainability information and growing scrutiny of sustainability-related claims and disclosure has also increased the risk that companies could be perceived as, or accused of, making inaccurate or misleading statements, often referred to as “greenwashing.” Such perception or accusation could damage our reputation and result in litigation or regulatory actions. Further, organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters. Such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment and voting decisions. Unfavorable ESG ratings could lead to increased negative investor sentiment toward us and our industry and to the diversion of investment to other industries, which could have a negative impact on our stock price and our access to and costs of capital.

Failure of third parties to manufacture quality products or provide reliable services in accordance with schedules, prices, quality and volumes that are acceptable to us could cause delays in developing and operating our commercial production facilities, which could damage our reputation, adversely affect our partner relationships or adversely affect our growth.

Our success depends on our ability to develop and operate our commercial production facilities in a timely manner, which depends in part on the ability of third parties to provide us with timely and reliable products and services. In developing and operating our commercial production facilities and technologies, we rely on products meeting our design specifications and components manufactured and supplied by third parties, and on services performed by contractors and subcontractors. We also rely on contractors and subcontractors to perform substantially all of the construction and installation work related to our commercial production facilities, and we often need to engage contractors or subcontractors with whom we have no past experience.

If any of our contractors or subcontractors are unable to provide services that meet or exceed our expectations or satisfy our contractual commitments, our reputation, business and operating results could be harmed. In addition, if we are unable to avail ourselves of warranties and other contractual protections with providers of products and services, we may incur liability to our customers or additional costs related to the affected products, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, any delays, malfunctions, inefficiencies or interruptions in these products or services could adversely affect the quality and performance of our commercial production facilities and require considerable expense to find replacement products and to maintain and repair our facilities. This could cause us to experience interruption in our production and distribution of renewable gasoline, difficulty retaining current relationships and attracting new relationships, or harm our brand, reputation or growth. 

We may be unable to successfully perform under future supply and distribution agreements to provide our renewable gasoline, which could harm our commercial prospects.

Our business strategy is to enter into multiple supply agreements pursuant to which we will supply our renewable gasoline to various customers. Under certain of these supply agreements, we expect the purchasers will agree to pay for and receive, or cause to be received by a third party, or pay for even if not taken, the renewable gasoline under contract (a “take-or-pay” arrangement). We anticipate that the timing and volume commitment of certain of these agreements will be conditioned upon, and subject to, our ability to complete the construction of our first commercial production facility and our additional planned and identified potential commercial production facilities. In order to construct and commence operations of commercial production facilities, we must secure third-party financing. We believe that we will be able to secure adequate financing in order to commence construction of and complete our commercial production facilities and, in turn, perform under these agreements, we cannot assure you that we will in the future be able to obtain adequate financing on favorable terms, or at all. Furthermore, we have not demonstrated that we can meet the production levels and specifications contemplated in anticipated or future supply agreements. If our production is slower than we expect, if demand decreases or if we encounter difficulties in successfully completing our first commercial production facility and our additional planned and identified potential commercial production facilities, the counterparties may terminate the supply agreements and potential customers may be less willing to negotiate definitive supply agreements with us, and therefore adversely impact our anticipated financial performance.


In addition, from time to time, we may enter into letters of intent, memoranda of understanding and other largely non-binding agreements or understandings with potential customers or partners in order to develop our business combination.and the markets that we serve. We can make no assurance that legally binding, definitive agreements reflecting the terms of such non-binding agreements will be completed with such customers or partners, or at all.

Third parties on whom we may rely for transportation services are subject to complex federal, state and other laws that could adversely affect our operations.

The operations of third parties on whom we may rely for transportation services are subject to complex and stringent laws and regulations that require obtaining and maintaining numerous permits, approvals and certifications from various federal, state and local government authorities. These third parties may incur substantial costs in order to comply with existing laws and regulations. If existing laws and regulations governing such third-party services are revised or reinterpreted, or if new laws and regulations become applicable to their operations, these changes may affect the costs that we pay for services. Similarly, a failure to comply with such laws and regulations by the third parties could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business and operations may be significantly disrupted upon the occurrence of a catastrophic event, information technology system failures or cyberattack.

Our business is dependent on proprietary technologies, processes and information that we have developed, much of which is stored on our computer systems. We also have entered into agreements with third parties for hardware, software, telecommunications and other information technology (“IT”) services in connection with our operations. Our operations depend, in part, on how well we and our vendors protect networks, equipment, IT systems and software against damage from a number of threats, including, but not limited to, cable cuts, damage to physical plants, natural disasters, intentional damage and destruction, fire, power loss, hacking, computer viruses, vandalism, theft, malware, ransomware and phishing attacks. Any of these and other events could result in IT system failures, delays, a material disruption of our business or increases in capital expenses. Our operations also depend on the timely maintenance, upgrade and replacement of networks, equipment and IT systems and software, as well as preemptive expenses to mitigate the risks of failures.

Furthermore, the importance of such information technology systems and networks and systems has increased due to many of our employees working remotely on less secure systems and environments. Additionally, if one of our service providers were to fail and we were unable to find a suitable replacement in a timely manner, we could be unable to properly administer our outsourced functions. If we cannot continue to retain these services provided by our vendors on acceptable terms, our access to the IT system and services could be interrupted. Any security breach, interruption or failure in our IT system and operations could impair quality of services, increase costs, prompt litigation and other consumer claims, result in liability under our contracts, and damage our reputation, any of which could substantially harm our business, financial condition or the results of operations.

As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. While we have implemented security resources to protect our data security and information technology systems, such measures may not prevent such events. In addition, certain measures that could increase the security of our IT system take significant time and resources to deploy broadly, and such measures may not be deployed in a timely manner or be effective against an attack. The inability to implement, maintain and upgrade adequate safeguards could have a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Significant disruption to our IT system or breaches of data security could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Cyber-attacks are of ever-increasing levels of sophistication, and despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to such attacks or may be breached, including due to employee error or malfeasance.

Our facilities and processes may fail to produce renewable gasoline at the volumes, rates and costs we expect.

Some, or all, of our future commercial production facilities may be in locations distant from biomass and MSW, natural gas or other feedstock sources, which could increase our feedstock costs or prevent us from acquiring sufficient feedstock volumes for commercial production. General market conditions might also cause increases in feedstock prices, which could likewise increase our production costs.


Even if we secure access to sufficient volumes of feedstock, our commercial production facilities may fail to perform as expected. The equipment and subsystems that we install in our commercial production facilities may never operate as planned. Unexpected problems may force us to cease or delay production and the time and costs involved with such delays may prove prohibitive. Any or all of these risks could prevent us from achieving the production throughput and yields necessary to achieve our target annualized production run rates and/or to meet the future volume demands or minimum requirements of our customers, including pursuant to definitive supply or distribution agreements that we may enter into, which may subject us to monetary damages. Failure to achieve these rates or meet these minimum requirements, or achieving them only after significant additional expenditures, could substantially harm our commercial performance.

We may in the future use hedging arrangements to mitigate certain risks, but the use of such derivative instruments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We are likely in the future to use interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk. In addition, we may use forward energy sales and other types of hedging contracts, including foreign currency hedges if we do expand into other countries. If we elect to enter into these type of hedging arrangements, our related assets could recognize financial losses on these arrangements as a result of volatility in the market values of the underlying asset or if a counterparty fails to perform under a contract. If actively quoted market prices and pricing information from external sources are not available, the valuation of these contracts would involve judgment or the use of estimates. As a result, changes in the underlying assumptions or use of alternative valuation methods could affect the reported fair value of these contracts. If the values of these financial contracts change in a manner that we do not anticipate, or if a counterparty fails to perform under a contract, it could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Business interruptions, including those related to the widespread outbreak of an illness, pandemic (such as COVID-19), adverse weather conditions, manmade problems such as terrorism and other catastrophic events, may have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

We are vulnerable to natural disasters, the intensity or frequency of which may be influenced by climate change, and other events that could disrupt our operations. Any of our facilities or future facilities or operations may be harmed or rendered inoperable by catastrophic events, such as natural disasters, including earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, wildfires, floods; nuclear disasters, riots, civil disturbances, war, acts of terrorism or other criminal activities; pandemics (such as COVID-19); power outages and other events beyond our control. We do not have a detailed disaster recovery plan. In addition, we may not carry sufficient business interruption or other insurance to compensate us for losses that may occur and it is possible that sufficient insurance coverage may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Any losses or damages we incur could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows and success as an overall business.

In the event of natural disaster or other catastrophic event, we may be unable to continue our operations and may endure production interruptions, reputational harm, delays in manufacturing, delays in the development and testing of our STG+® solutions, and related technologies, and the loss of critical data, all of which could have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results. If our facilities are damaged by such natural disasters or catastrophic events, the repair or replacement would likely be costly and any such efforts would likely require substantial time that may affect our ability to produce and deliver our renewable gasoline. Any future disruptions in our operations could negatively impact our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results and harm our reputation. In addition, we may not carry enough insurance to compensate for the losses that may occur.


Even if we are successful in completing the first commercial production facility and consistently producing renewable gasoline on a commercial scale, we may not be successful in commencing and expanding commercial operations to support the growth of our business.

Our ability to achieve meaningful future revenue will depend in large part upon our ability to attract customers and enter into contracts on favorable terms. We expect that many of our customers will be large companies with extensive experience operating in the fuels or chemicals markets. We lack significant commercial operating experience and may face difficulties in developing marketing expertise in these fields. Our business model relies upon our ability to successfully implement the first commercial production facility and commence and expand commercial operations and successfully negotiate, structure and fulfill long-term supply agreements for our renewable gasoline. Agreements with potential customers may initially only provide for the purchase of limited quantities from us. Our ability to increase our sales will depend in large part upon our ability to expand these existing customer relationships into long-term supply agreements. Establishing, maintaining and expanding relationships with customers can require substantial investment without any assurance from customers that they will place significant orders. In addition, many of our potential customers may be more experienced in these matters than we are, and we may fail to successfully negotiate these agreements in a timely manner or on favorable terms which, in turn, may force us to slow our production, dedicate additional resources to increasing our storage capacity and/or dedicate resources to sales in spot markets. Furthermore, should we become more dependent on spot market sales, any potential profitability will become increasingly vulnerable to short-term fluctuations in the price and demand for petroleum-based fuels and competing substitutes.

We are a development stage company with a history of net losses, we are currently not profitable and we may not achieve or maintain profitability and if we incur substantial losses, we may have to curtail our operations, which may prevent us from successfully operating and expanding our business.

We have incurred net losses since our inception. We are currently in the development stage and have not yet commenced principal operations or generated revenue.

Furthermore, we expect to spend significant amounts on further development of our technology, acquiring or otherwise gaining access to commercial production facilities, marketing and general and administrative expenses associated with our planned growth and management of operations as a public company. In some market environments, we may have limited access to incremental financing, which could defer or cancel growth projects, reduce business activity or cause us to default under any debt agreements if we are unable to meet our payment schedules. In addition, the cost of preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent, trademark and other intellectual property rights and defending ourselves against claims by others that we may be violating their intellectual property rights may be significant. As a result, even if we are able to generate revenues in future periods, we expect that our expenses will exceed revenues for the foreseeable future. We do not expect to achieve profitability in the near future, and may never achieve it. If we fail to complete our business combination,achieve profitability, or if the time required to achieve profitability is longer than we will never generate any operating revenues.

Our public stockholdersanticipate, we may not be affordedable to continue our business. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. As such, we are exposed to the risk of being a development-stage company with a history of losses in an opportunityearly-stage of operations.

Our actual costs may be greater than expected in developing our commercial production facilities or growth projects, causing us to voterealize significantly lower profits or greater losses.

We generally must estimate the costs of completing a specific commercial production facility or growth project prior to the construction of the facility or project. The actual cost of labor and materials may vary from the costs we originally estimated. These variations may cause the gross cost for a commercial production facility or growth project to differ from those we originally estimated. Cost overruns on our proposed business combination, which means we may complete our initial business combination even though holders of a majority of our common stock do not support such a combination.

We may not hold a stockholder votecommercial production facilities and growth projects could occur due to approve our initial business combination unless the business combination would require stockholder approval under applicable law or stock exchange listing requirements or if we decide to hold a stockholder vote for business or other legal reasons. Except as required by law, the decision as to whether we will seek stockholder approval of a proposed business combination or will allow stockholders to sell their shares to uschanges in a tender offer will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors such as:

failure to properly estimate costs of engineering, materials, equipment, labor or financing;

unanticipated technical problems with the structures, materials or services;

unanticipated project modifications;

changes in the costs of equipment, materials, labor or contractors (whether as a result of supply chain issues, macroeconomic conditions or otherwise);


our strategic partners, suppliers’ or contractors’ failure to perform;

changes in laws and regulations; and

delays caused by weather conditions.

As commercial production facilities or projects grow in size and complexity, multiple factors may contribute to reduced profit or greater losses, and depending on the size of the particular project, variations from the estimated costs could have a material adverse effect on our business. For example, if costs exceed our estimates, it could cause us to realize significantly lower profits or greater losses.

Disruption in the supply chain, including increases in costs, shortage of materials or other disruption of supply, or in the workforce could materially adversely affect our business.

We rely on our suppliers and strategic partners for our business, from feedstocks to materials for our commercial production facilities and our STG+® technology. Future delays or interruptions in the supply chain could expose us to the various risks which would likely significantly increase our costs and/or impact our operations or business plans including:

we or our strategic partners may have excess or inadequate inventory of feedstocks for operation of our facilities;

we may face delays in construction or development of our growth projects;

we may not be able to timely procure parts or equipment to upgrade, replace, or repair our facilities and technology system; and

our suppliers may encounter financial hardships unrelated to our demand, which could inhibit their ability to fulfill our orders and meet our requirements.

We may not be able to obtain, or comply with terms and conditions for, government grants, loans, and other incentives for which we may apply for in the future, which may limit our opportunities to expand our business.

We anticipate that in the future there will be new opportunities for us to apply for grants, loans, and other federal and state incentives. Our ability to obtain funds or incentives from government sources is subject to the availability of funds under applicable government programs and approval of our applications to participate in such programs. The application process for these programs and other incentives is and will remain highly competitive. We may not be successful in obtaining any of these additional grants, loans, and other incentives. We may in the future fail to comply with the conditions of these incentives, which could cause us to lose funding or negotiate with governmental entities to revise such conditions. We may be unable to find alternative sources of funding to meet our planned capital needs, in which case, our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results could be adversely affected.

We may expand our operations globally, which would subject us to anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering, trade compliance, economic sanctions and similar laws, and non-compliance with such laws may subject us to criminal or civil liability and harm our business, financial condition and/or results of operations. We may also be subject to governmental export and import controls that could impair our ability to compete in international markets or subject us to liability if we violate the controls.

If we expand our operations globally, we would be subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, U.S. domestic bribery laws, and other anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws in the countries in which we would conduct business. Anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws have been enforced aggressively in recent years and are interpreted broadly to generally prohibit companies, their employees, and their third-party intermediaries from authorizing, offering, or providing, directly or indirectly, improper payments or benefits to recipients in the public or private sector. If we engage in international operations, sales and business with partners and third-party intermediaries to market our products, we may be required to obtain additional permits, licenses, and other regulatory approvals. In addition, we or our third-party intermediaries may have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies or state-owned or affiliated entities. If we engage in international operations, sales and business with the public sector, we can be held liable for the corrupt or other illegal activities of these third-party intermediaries, our employees, agents, representatives, contractors, and partners, even if we do not explicitly authorize such activities.


Failure to protect our intellectual property, inability to enforce our intellectual property rights or loss of our intellectual property rights through costly litigation or administrative proceedings, could adversely affect our ability to compete and our business.

Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary protection for commercially important inventions, to obtain and maintain know-how related to our business, including our proprietary manufacturing technology, to defend and enforce our intellectual property rights, in particular our patent rights, to preserve the confidentiality of our trade secrets, and to operate without infringing, misappropriating, or violating the valid and enforceable patents and other intellectual property rights of third parties. We rely on various intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks, and trade secrets, as well as confidentiality provisions and contractual arrangements, and other forms of statutory protection to protect our proprietary rights. We will be able to protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that our proprietary technologies and future products are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are effectively maintained as trade secrets. If we do not protect and enforce our intellectual property rights adequately and successfully, our competitive position may suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.

Our pending patent or trademark applications may not be approved, or competitors or others may challenge the validity, enforceability, or scope of our patents, the registrability of our trademarks or the trade secret status of our proprietary information. There can be no assurance that additional patents will be issued or that any issued patents will provide significant protection for our intellectual property or for those portions of our proprietary technology and software that are the most key to our competitive positions in the marketplace. In addition, our patents, trademarks, trade secrets, and other intellectual property rights may not provide us a significant competitive advantage. There is no assurance that the forms of intellectual property protection that we seek, including business decisions about when and where to file patents and when and how to maintain and protect trade secrets, license and other contractual rights will be adequate to protect our business.

Moreover, recent amendments to developing jurisprudence and current and possible future changes to intellectual property laws and regulations, including U.S. and foreign patent, trade secret and other statutory law, may affect our ability to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights and to protect our proprietary technology. Despite our precautions, our intellectual property is vulnerable to unauthorized access and copying through employee, contractor or other third-party error or actions, including malicious state or state-sponsored actors, theft, hacking, cybersecurity incidents, and other security breaches and incidents, and such incidents may be difficult to detect or may be unknown for a significant period of time. It is possible for third parties to infringe upon or misappropriate our intellectual property, to copy or reverse engineer our proprietary manufacturing process, and to use information that we regard as proprietary to create products and services that compete with ours. 

Intellectual property laws, procedures, and restrictions provide only limited protection and any of our intellectual property rights may be challenged, invalidated, circumvented, infringed, or misappropriated. Further, the laws of certain countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the timinglaws of the transactionUnited States, and, therefore, in certain jurisdictions, we may be unable to protect our proprietary technology. Effective patent, trademark and other intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which our services are made available. To the extent we expand our international activities, our exposure to unauthorized copying and use of our intellectual property and proprietary information may increase. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from infringing on our intellectual property in all countries outside the U.S., or from selling or importing products made using our intellectual property in and into the U.S. or other jurisdictions. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and may also export infringing products to territories where we have patent protection, but enforcement of patents and other intellectual protection is not as strong as that in the U.S. These products may compete with our products and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.

As we move into new markets and expand our products or services offerings, incumbent participants in such markets may assert their intellectual property and other proprietary rights against us as a means of slowing our entry into such markets or as a means to extract substantial license and royalty payments from us. In addition, our agreements with some of our customers, suppliers or other entities with whom we do business requires us to defend or indemnify these parties to the extent they become involved in infringement claims, including the types of claims described above. As a result, we could incur significant costs and expenses that could adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition.


We have entered into confidentiality agreements with certain contractors and consultants as well as agreements containing restrictive covenants and confidentiality provisions with certain employees, and we may enter into agreements with similar provisions with our employees and with other third parties in the future. We cannot ensure that these agreements, or all the terms thereof, will be enforceable or compliant with applicable law, or otherwise effective in controlling access to, use of, reverse engineering, and distribution of our proprietary information. Further, these agreements with our employees, contractors, and other parties may not prevent other parties from independently developing technologies, products and services that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technologies, products and services.

We believe that our proprietary manufacturing technology is a unique aspect in the current market and provides us with a significant competitive advantage. Our ability to prevent competitors from replicating this technology depends on our ability to obtain, maintain, protect, defend and enforce our intellectual property rights in the processes that comprise the technology and/or keep those processes and the underlying technology secret. We may not be able to prevent competitors from replicating or developing a better version of our proprietary manufacturing technology, which could result in a substantial decrease in our revenue and limit demand for our services.

We may need to spend significant resources securing and monitoring our intellectual property rights, and we may or may not be able to detect infringement by third parties. The steps we take to protect our intellectual property rights may not be sufficient to effectively prevent third parties from infringing, misappropriating, diluting or otherwise violating our intellectual property rights or to prevent unauthorized disclosure or unauthorized use of our trade secrets or other confidential information. Our competitive position may be adversely impacted if we cannot detect infringement or enforce our intellectual property rights quickly or at all. In some circumstances, we may choose not to pursue enforcement because an infringer has a dominant intellectual property position, because of uncertainty relating to the scope of our intellectual property or the outcome of an enforcement action, or for other business reasons. In addition, competitors might avoid infringement by designing around our intellectual property rights or by developing non-infringing competing technologies. Litigation brought to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights could be costly, time-consuming, and distracting to management and our development teams and could result in the impairment or loss of portions of our intellectual property. Further, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights may be met with defenses, counterclaims attacking the scope, validity, and enforceability of our intellectual property rights, or with counterclaims and countersuits asserting infringement by us of third-party intellectual property rights. Our failure to secure, protect, and enforce our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our brand and our business, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.

Agreements containing confidentiality provisions and restrictive covenants with employees, contractors, consultants and other third-parties may not adequately prevent disclosures of trade secrets and other proprietary information.

We rely in part on trade secret protection to protect our confidential and proprietary information and processes. However, trade secrets are difficult to protect. We have taken measures to protect our trade secrets and proprietary information, but these measures may not be effective. We generally require our employees, consultants and contractors to enter into confidentiality agreements with us. We cannot guarantee that we have entered into such agreements with each party who has developed intellectual property on our behalf and each party that has or may have had access to our confidential information, know-how and trade secrets. We intend for new employees, consultants and other third parties to execute confidentiality agreements or agreements containing confidentiality provisions upon the commencement of an employment or consulting arrangement with us. These agreements generally require that all confidential information developed by the individual or made known to the individual by us during the course of the individual’s relationship with us be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties. These agreements also generally provide that know-how and inventions conceived by the individual in the course of rendering services to us shall be our exclusive property. Nevertheless, these agreements may be insufficient or breached, or may not be enforceable, our proprietary information may be disclosed, third parties could reverse engineer our biocatalysts and others may independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets. Moreover, these agreements may not provide an adequate remedy for breaches or in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information or technology. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive business position. In addition, trade secrets and know-how can be difficult to protect and some courts inside and outside of the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets and know-how. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, we would not be able to prevent them from using that technology or information to compete with us, and our competitive position could be materially and adversely harmed. An unauthorized breach in our information technology systems may expose our trade secrets and other proprietary information to unauthorized parties. 


Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, documentary, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

The United States Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent prosecution process. When related patents are pursued concurrently in multiple jurisdictions, international treaties may impose additional procedural, documentary, fee payment and other provisions. Periodic maintenance or annuity fees and various other governmental fees on any issued patent and/or pending patent applications are due to be paid to the USPTO and foreign patent agencies in several stages over the lifetime of a patent or patent application. Our outside counsel has systems in place to remind us to pay these fees, and we rely on our outside counsel and their third-party vendors to pay these fees. While an inadvertent lapse may sometimes be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are many situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction.

Non-compliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. If we fail to maintain the patents and patent applications directed to our proprietary technology, our competitors might be able to enter the market, which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Changes in patent law could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our technology.

Our success is dependent on intellectual property, particularly patents. Obtaining and enforcing patents in our industry involves both technological and legal complexity and is therefore costly, time-consuming and inherently uncertain, due in part to ongoing changes in patent laws. Depending on decisions by Congress, the federal courts and the USPTO, and equivalent institutions in other jurisdictions, the laws and regulations governing patents, and interpretation thereof, could change in unpredictable ways that could weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce existing or future patents. We cannot predict future changes in the interpretation of patent laws or changes to patent laws that might be enacted into law. Those changes may materially affect our patents or patent applications and our ability to obtain additional patent protection in the future.

Patent law can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions for which important principles remain unresolved. In the United States and in many international jurisdictions, policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in patents can be inconsistent. The U.S. Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have made, and will likely continue to make, changes in how they interpret the patent laws of the United States. Similarly, international courts have made, and will likely continue to make, changes in how they interpret the patent laws in their respective jurisdictions. We cannot predict future changes in the interpretation of patent laws or changes to patent laws that might be enacted into law by U.S. and international legislative bodies. Those changes may materially affect our patent rights and our ability to obtain issued patents.


We may be subject to intellectual property rights claims by third parties, which could be costly to defend, could require us to pay significant damages and, if we are unsuccessful in defending such claims, could limit our ability to use certain technologies and compete.

Third parties may assert claims of infringement of intellectual property rights or violation of other statutory, license or contractual rights in technology against us or against our customers for which we may be liable or have an indemnification obligation. Any such claim by a third party, even if without merit, could cause us to incur substantial costs defending against such claim and could distract our management and our development teams from our business.

Although third parties may offer a license to their technology the terms of any offered license may not be acceptable and the failure to obtain a license or the costs associated with any license could cause our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results to be adversely affected. In addition, some licenses may be non-exclusive, and therefore our competitors may have access to the same technology licensed to us. Alternatively, we may be required to develop non-infringing technology which could require significant effort and expense and ultimately may not be successful. Furthermore, a successful claimant could secure a judgment or we may agree to a settlement that prevents us from selling certain products or performing certain services or that requires us to pay substantial damages, including treble damages if we are found to have willfully infringed such claimant’s patents, copyrights, trade secrets or other statutory rights, royalties or other fees. Any of these events could have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.

We may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information or alleged trade secrets of third parties or competitors or are in breach of noncompetition or non-solicitation agreements with our competitors or their former employers.

We also may employ or otherwise engage personnel who were previously or are concurrently employed or engaged at research institutions or other clean technology companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. We may be subject to claims that these personnel, or we, have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former or concurrent employers, or that patents and applications we have filed to protect inventions of these personnel, even those related to our technology, are rightfully owned by their former or concurrent employer. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could adversely affect our operations, result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management. 

Our business and prospects depend significantly on our ability to build our brand and we may not succeed in continuing to establish, maintain, and strengthen our brand, and our brand and reputation could be harmed by negative publicity regarding our company or products.

Our business and prospects are dependent on our ability to develop, maintain, and strengthen our brand. Promoting and positioning our brand will depend significantly on our ability to provide high quality clean, renewable gasoline. In addition, we expect that our ability to develop, maintain, and strengthen our brand will also depend heavily on the success of our branding efforts. To promote our brand, we need to incur increased expenses, such as the costs associated with conducting product demonstrations and attending trade conferences. Brand promotion activities may not yield increased revenue, and even if they do, the increased revenue may not offset the expenses we incur in building and maintaining our brand and reputation. If we fail to promote and maintain our brand successfully or to maintain loyalty among our customers, or if we incur substantial expenses in an unsuccessful attempt to promote and maintain our brand, we may fail to attract new customers and partners, or retain our existing customers and partners and our business and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We also believe that the protection of our trademark rights is an important factor in product recognition, protecting our brand and maintaining goodwill. We may be unable to obtain trademark protection for our technologies, logos, slogans and brands, and our existing trademark registrations and applications, and any trademarks that may be used in the future, may not provide us with competitive advantages or distinguish our products and services from those of our competitors. Further, we may not timely or successfully register our trademarks. If we do not adequately protect our rights in our trademarks from infringement and unauthorized use, any goodwill that we have developed in those trademarks could be lost or impaired, which could harm our brand and our business.


Moreover, any negative publicity relating to our employees, current or future partners, our STG+® technology, our clean, renewable gasoline, or customers who use our technology or gasoline, or others associated with these parties may also tarnish our own reputation simply by association and may reduce the value of our brand. Additionally, if safety or other incidents or defects in our gasoline occur or are perceived to have occurred, whether or not such incidents or defects are our fault, we could be subject to adverse publicity, which could be particularly harmful to our business given our limited operating history. Given the popularity of social media, any negative publicity about our products, whether true or not, could quickly proliferate and harm customer and community perceptions and confidence in our brand. Other businesses, including our competitors, may also be incentivized to fund negative campaigns against our company to damage our brand and reputation to further their own purposes. Future customers of our products and services may have similar sensitivities and may be subject to similar public opinion and perception risks. Damage to our brand and reputation may result in reduced demand for our products and increased risk of losing market share to our competitors. Any efforts to restore the value of our brand and rebuild our reputation may be costly and may not be successful, and our inability to develop and maintain a strong brand could have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.

If we fail to comply with our obligations under license or technology agreements with third parties or are unable to license rights to use technologies on reasonable terms, we may be required to pay damages and could potentially lose license rights that are critical to our business.

We license certain intellectual property, including technologies, data, content and software from third parties, that is important to our business, and in the future we may enter into additional agreements that provide us with licenses to valuable intellectual property or technology. If we fail to comply with any of the obligations under our license agreements, we may be required to pay damages and the licensor may have the right to terminate the license. Termination by the licensor would cause us to lose valuable rights, and could prevent us from selling our products and services, or inhibit our ability to commercialize future products and services. Our business would suffer if any current or future licenses terminate, if the licensors fail to abide by the terms of the transaction wouldlicense, if the licensed intellectual property rights are found to be invalid or unenforceable, or if we are unable to enter into necessary licenses on acceptable terms. Moreover, our licensors may own or control intellectual property that has not been licensed to us and, as a result, we may be subject to claims, regardless of their merit, that we are infringing or otherwise requireviolating the licensor’s rights.

In the future, we may identify additional third-party intellectual property we may need to license in order to engage in our business. However, such licenses may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. The licensing or acquisition of third-party intellectual property rights is a competitive area, and several more-established companies may pursue strategies to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights that we may consider attractive or necessary. In addition, companies that perceive us to seek stockholder approval. Accordingly,be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. Even if such licenses are available, we may completebe required to pay the licensor substantial royalties based on sales of our initialproducts and services. Such royalties are a component of the cost of our products or services and may affect the margins on our products and services. In addition, such licenses may be non-exclusive, which could give our competitors access to the same intellectual property licensed to us. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, combination evenfinancial condition and results of operations. 

If our estimates or judgments relating to our critical accounting policies prove to be incorrect or financial reporting standards or interpretations change, our operating results could be adversely affected.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, as described in the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities, and equity as of the date of the financial statements, and the amount of revenue and expenses, during the periods presented, that are not readily apparent from other sources. Significant assumptions and estimates used in preparing our financial statements include those related to impairment of intangible and long-lived assets, and share-based compensation. Our operating results may be adversely affected if holdersour assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our operating results to fall below the expectations of industry or financial analysts and investors, resulting in a majoritydecline in the trading price of our common stockstock.


Additionally, we regularly monitor our compliance with applicable financial reporting standards and review new pronouncements and drafts thereof that are relevant to us. As a result of new standards, changes to existing standards, and changes in interpretation, we might be required to change our accounting policies, alter our operational policies, or implement new or enhance existing systems so that they reflect new or amended financial reporting standards, or we may be required to restate our published financial statements. Changes to existing standards or changes in their interpretation may have an adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial position, and profit, or cause an adverse deviation from our revenue and operating profit target, which may negatively impact our financial results.

Inflation may adversely affect us by increasing costs of our business.

Inflation can adversely affect us by increasing costs of feedstock, equipment, materials, and labor. In addition, inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates. In an inflationary environment, such as the current economic environment, depending on other economic conditions, we may be unable to raise prices of our fuels or products to keep up with the rate of inflation, which would reduce our profit margins. Given the inflation rates in 2023 and thus far in 2024, we have experienced, and continue to experience, increases in prices of feedstock, equipment, materials, and labor. Continued inflationary pressures could impact our financial results.

Our industry and our technologies are rapidly evolving and may be subject to unforeseen changes, and developments in alternative technologies may adversely affect the demand for renewable gasoline, and if we fail to make the right investment decisions in our technologies and products, we may be at a competitive disadvantage.

The renewable fuels industry is relatively new and has experienced substantial change in the last several years. As more companies invest in renewable energy technology and alternative energy sources, we may be unable to keep up with technology advancements and, as a result, our competitiveness may suffer. As technologies change, we plan to spend significant resources in ongoing research and development, and to upgrade or adapt our renewable gasoline, and introduce new products and services in order to continue to provide renewable gasoline and related products with the latest technology. Our research and development efforts may not be sufficient or could involve substantial costs and delays and lower our return on investment for our technologies. Delays or missed opportunities to adopt new technologies could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.

In addition, we may not be able to compete effectively with other alternative fuel products and integrate the latest technology into our STG+® process and related technologies. Even if we are able to keep pace with changes in technology and develop new products, we are subject to the risk that our prior products and production process will become obsolete more quickly than expected, resulting in less efficient facilities and potentially reducing our return on investment. Moreover, developments in alternative technologies, such as advanced diesel, ethanol, hydrogen fuel cells, or compressed natural gas, or improvements in the fuel economy of the internal combustion engine, may adversely affect our business and prospects in ways we do not approvecurrently anticipate. Any developments with respect to these technologies and related renewables research, or the perception that they may occur, may prompt us to invest heavily in additional research to compete effectively with these advances, which research and development may not be effective. Any failure by us to successfully react to changes in existing technologies could adversely affect our competitive position and growth prospects. 

Concerns regarding the environmental impact of renewable gasoline production could affect public policy which could impair our ability to operate at a profit and substantially harm our revenues and operating margins.

Under the EISA, the EPA is required to produce a report to Congress every three years of the business combination we complete.environmental impacts associated with current and future biofuel production and use, including effects on air and water quality, soil quality and conservation, water availability, energy recovery from secondary materials, ecosystem health and biodiversity, invasive species and international impacts. The first report to Congress was completed in 2011 and provided an assessment of the environmental and resource conservation impacts associated with increased biofuel production. The second report to Congress, completed in 2018, reaffirmed the overarching conclusions of the first report. A draft of the third report to Congress was published in January 2023. Should such EPA triennial reports, or other analyses find that biofuel production and use has resulted in, or could in the future result in, adverse environmental impacts, such findings could also negatively impact public perception and acceptance of biofuel as an alternative fuel, which also could result in the loss of political support. To the extent that state or federal laws are modified or public perception turns against biofuels, use requirements such as RFS and LCFS may not continue, which could materially impact our ability to ever operate profitably.

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, our sponsor and the anchor investors have agreed to vote any founder shares held by them in favor of such initial business combination, regardless of how our public stockholders vote.


Unlike many other blank check companies in which the initial stockholders agree to vote their founder shares in accordance with the majority of the votes cast by the public stockholders in connection with an initial business combination, our sponsor has agreed to vote its founder shares, as well as any public shares purchased during or after the IPO, and the anchor investors have agreed to vote any founder shares held by them, in favor of our initial business combination. Our sponsor owns shares representing 20% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly, if we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, it is more likely that the necessary stockholder approval will be received than would be the case if our sponsor agreed to vote its founder shares in accordance with the majority of the votes cast by our public stockholders.

We haveThe Company identified material weaknesses in ourits internal control over financial reporting. Ifreporting that have been remediated, and if we are unable to develop and maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and materially and adversely affect our business and operating results, and we may face litigation as a result.

 

In connection with the preparation of ourIntermediate’s financial statements as of September 30,for the year ended December 31, 2022 and the period from July 31, 2020 (inception) to December 31, 2021, we reevaluated the classification of the Class A common stock subject to possible redemption. This revaluation was due to a recent notification from the SEC that SPAC’s must not report possible redemption of stock as permanent equity. After consultation with the chairman of our audit committee, our management concluded that the previously issued audited balance sheet dated as of August 17, 2021 related to the consummation of our initial public offering, which should be restated to report all Class A common stock subject to possible redemption as temporary equity. As part of such process, we identifiednoted a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting relatedas described in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2023. Management did not maintain effective internal control over the reconciliation of the final fair value of the unit-based compensation awards prepared by third party valuation specialists to the accounting records due to a lack of ability to account for complexprofessionals with defined roles within the accounting function providing financial instruments. During the quarter ended December 31, 2021,reporting oversight. Additionally, management identified a material weakness indid not maintain effective internal control relatingregarding the date on which to apply new accounting standards based upon CENAQ’s elections made under the over-allotment option. JOBS Act, as described in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2023, which required Intermediate to apply new accounting standards as if it were a public business entity. These material weaknesses have been remediated.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud, and material weaknessweaknesses could limit ourthe ability to prevent or detect a misstatement of our accounts or disclosures that could result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements. In such a case, we may be unable to maintain compliance with securities law requirements regarding timely filing of periodic reports in addition to applicable stock exchange continued listing requirements, investors may lose confidence in our financial reporting, our securities price may decline and we may face litigation as a result. We continue to evaluate steps to remediateWhile we have remediated the material weaknesses. These remediation measures mayweaknesses described above, there can be time consuming and costly and there is no assurance that these initiatives will ultimately have the intended effects. However, we cannot assure you that the measures we have taken to date, or any measures we may take in the future, will be sufficient to avoid potential future material weaknesses.

If we lose key personnel, including key management personnel, or are unable to attract and retain additional personnel, it could delay our development and harm our research, make it more difficult to pursue partnerships or develop our own products or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Our business is complex and we intend to target a variety of markets. Therefore, it is critical that our management team and employee workforce are knowledgeable in the areas in which we operate. The departure, illness or absence of any key members of our management, including our named executive officers, or the failure to attract or retain other key employees who possess the requisite expertise for the conduct of our business, could prevent us from developing and commercializing our renewable gasoline for our target markets and entering into partnership arrangements to execute our business strategy. In addition, the loss of any key scientific staff, or the failure to attract or retain other key scientific employees, could prevent us from developing and commercializing our renewable gasoline for our target markets and entering into partnership arrangements to execute our business strategy. All of our employees are at-will employees, meaning that either the employee or we may terminate their employment at any time.

We also engage a number of individuals as independent contractors to provide certain material scientific and engineering services. The failure to retain access to the services provided by these individuals, or to attract and retain individuals to provide consulting or other services, could also delay or prevent us from developing and commercializing our renewable gasoline for our target markets and entering into partnership arrangements to execute our business strategy, and otherwise executing on our business plans.


 

Our management team has limited experience in operating a public company.

 

Your only opportunityOur executive officers have limited experience in the management of a publicly traded company. Our management team may not successfully or effectively manage our operations to affectcomply with the investment decision regardingregulatory oversight and reporting obligations under federal securities laws. We may not have adequate personnel with the appropriate level of knowledge, experience, and training in the policies, practices or internal controls over financial reporting required of public companies in the United States. As a potential business combination willresult, we may be limitedrequired to pay higher outside legal, accounting or consulting costs than our competitors, and our management team members may have to devote a higher proportion of their time to issues relating to compliance with the exerciselaws applicable to public companies, both of your rightwhich might put us at a disadvantage relative to redeem your shares from us for cash, unless we seek stockholder approval of the business combination.competitors.

AtWe are a “controlled company” within the timemeaning of your investment in us,Nasdaq Capital Market rules and, as a result, qualify for exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements, and as a result, you do not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are not exempt from such corporate governance requirements.

Over 50% of our voting power for the election of directors is held by an individual, group or another company. As a result, we are a controlled company within the meaning of Nasdaq Capital Market corporate governance standards. Under Nasdaq Capital Market rules, a controlled company may elect not to comply with certain Nasdaq corporate governance requirements, including the requirements that:

a majority of the board consist of independent directors under Nasdaq Capital Market rules;

the nominating and governance committee be composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities; and

the compensation committee be composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities.

These requirements will not be provided with an opportunityapply to evaluate the specific meritsus as long as we remain a controlled company. We may utilize some or risksall of one or more target businesses. Since our Board may complete a business combination without seeking stockholder approval, public stockholdersthese exemptions. Accordingly, you may not have the right or opportunitysame protections afforded to vote onstockholders of companies that are subject to all of the business combination, unlesscorporate governance requirements of Nasdaq Capital Market.

From time to time, we seek such stockholder vote. Accordingly, if we do not seek stockholder approval, your only opportunity to affect the investment decision regarding a potential business combination may be limited to exercising your redemption rights within the period of time (which will be at least 20 business days) set forthinvolved in litigation, regulatory actions or government investigations and inquiries, which could have an adverse impact on our tender offer documents mailed to our public stockholders in which we describe our initial business combination.financial results and consolidated financial position.

 

The ability of our public stockholders to redeem their shares for cash may make our financial condition unattractive to potential business combination targets, which may make it difficult for us to enter into a business combination with a target.

We may seekbe involved in a variety of litigation, other claims, suits, regulatory actions or government investigations and inquiries and commercial or contractual disputes that, from time to enter into a business combination transaction agreement with a prospective target that requires as a closing condition thattime, are significant. In addition, from time to time, we have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. If too many public stockholders exercise their redemption rights, we would notmay also be able to meet such closing conditioninvolved in legal proceedings and as a result, would not be able to proceed with the business combination. Furthermore, in no event will we redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 upon completion of our initial business combination (so that we are not subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules) or any greater net tangible asset or cash requirement that may be containedinvestigations arising in the agreement relatingnormal course of business including, without limitation, commercial or contractual disputes, including warranty claims and other disputes with potential customers, former employees and suppliers, intellectual property matters, personal injury claims, environmental issues, tax matters, and employment matters. It is difficult to our initial business combination. Consequently,predict the outcome or ultimate financial exposure, if accepting all properly submitted redemption requests would cause our net tangible assets toany, represented by these matters, and there can be less than $5,000,001 upon completion of our initial business combination orno assurance that any such greater amount necessary to satisfy a closing condition as described above, we would not proceed with such redemption and the related business combination and may instead search for an alternate business combination. Prospective targets will be aware of these risks and, thus, may be reluctant to enter into a business combination transaction with us.

The ability of our public stockholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares may not allow us to complete the most desirable business combination or optimize our capital structure.

At the time we enter into an agreement for our initial business combination, we will not know how many public stockholders may exercise their redemption rights, and therefore will need to structure the transaction based on our expectations as to the number of shares that will be submitted for redemption. If our business combination agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the trust account to pay the purchase price, or requires us to have a minimum amount of cash at closing, we will need to reserve a portion of the cash in the trust account to meet such requirements, or arrange for third party financing. In addition, if a larger number of shares are submitted for redemption than we initially expected, we may need to restructure the transaction to reserve a greater portion of the cash in the trust account or arrange for third party financing. Raising additional third-party financing may involve dilutive equity issuances or the incurrence of indebtedness at higher than desirable levels. The above considerations may limit our ability to complete the most desirable business combination available to us or optimize our capital structure. The amount of the deferred underwriting commissions payable to the underwritersexposure will not be adjusted for any shares that are redeemed in connection with a business combination. The per-share amount we will distribute to stockholders who properly exercise their redemption rights will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting commission and after such redemptions, the per-share value of shares held by non-redeeming stockholders will reflectmaterial. Such claims may also negatively affect our obligation to pay the deferred underwriting commissions.reputation.

Risks Related to the Company

Future sales and issuances of our Class A Common Stock could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause our share price to fall.

 

We expect that significant additional capital will be needed in the future to pursue our growth plan. To raise capital, we may sell shares of our Class A Common Stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner we determine from time to time. If we sell shares of our Class A Common Stock, convertible securities or other equity securities, investors may be materially diluted by subsequent sales. Such sales may also result in material dilution to our existing stockholders, and new investors could gain rights, preferences, and privileges senior to existing holders of our Class A Common Stock.


 

The abilityFuture sales of a substantial number of shares of our public stockholders to exercise redemption rights with respect toClass A Common Stock, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares of Class A Common Stock intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our Class A Common Stock.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our Class A Common Stock in the public market could occur at any time as substantially all of our shares of Class A Common Stock are eligible to be sold pursuant to Rule 144, subject to volume limitations. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares of Class A Common Stock intend to sell shares, could increasereduce the probabilitymarket price of our Class A Common Stock.

The loss of our senior management or technical personnel could adversely affect our ability to successfully operate our business.

While the success of the Company is dependent upon, along with other factors, the service of our executive officers and additional employees that we engage, there is no assurance that key personnel will continue with the Company. The loss of the services of our senior management or technical personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the Company believes that the future success will depend in large part of its ability to attract and retain qualified management and technical personnel, and there can be no assurance that such personnel can be attracted and retained.

There are inherent limitations in all control systems, and misstatements due to error or fraud that could seriously harm our business may occur and not be detected.

Our management does not expect that our initial business combination would be unsuccessfulinternal and disclosure controls will prevent all possible error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that you would have to wait for liquidation in order to redeem your stock.

If our business combination agreement requires us to use a portionthe objectives of the cash incontrol system are met. In addition, the trust account to paydesign of a control system must reflect the purchase price or requires us to have a minimum amount of cash at closing, the probabilityfact that our initial business combination would be unsuccessful is increased. If our initial business combination is unsuccessful, you would not receive your pro rata portion of the trust account until we liquidate the trust account. If you need immediate liquidity, you could attempt to sell your stock in the open market; however, at such time our stock may trade at a discount to the pro rata amount per share in the trust account. In either situation, you may suffer a material loss on your investment or losethere are resource constraints and the benefit of funds expectedcontrols must be relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in connection with our redemption untilall control systems, an evaluation of controls can only provide reasonable assurance that all material control issues and instances of fraud, if any, in we liquidate, or you are able to sell your stock in the open market.have been detected.

These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Further, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons or by collusion of two or more persons. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. A failure of our controls and procedures to detect error or fraud could seriously harm our business and results of operations.

Cyber incidents or attacks directed at us could result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/or financial loss.

 

The requirement that we complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame may give potential target businesses leverage over us in negotiating a business combinationWe depend on digital technologies, including information systems, infrastructure and may decrease our ability to conduct due diligence on potential business combination targets as we approach our dissolution deadline, which could undermine our ability to complete our business combination on terms that would produce value for our stockholders.

Any potential target businesscloud applications and services, including those of third parties with which we enter into negotiations concerning a business combination will be aware that we must completemay deal. Sophisticated and deliberate attacks on, or security breaches in, our initial business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extendsystems or infrastructure, or the periodsystems or infrastructure of timethird parties or the cloud, could lead to consummatecorruption or misappropriation of our initial business combinationassets, proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data. As an early-stage company without significant investments in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO. Consequently, such target business may obtain leverage over us in negotiating a business combination, knowing that if we do not complete our initial business combination with that particular target business,data security protection, we may not be unable to complete our initial business combination with any target business. This risk will increase as we get closer to the timeframe described above. In addition, we may have limited time to conduct due diligence and may enter into our initial business combination on terms that we would have rejected upon a more comprehensive investigation.

sufficiently protected against such occurrences. We may not have sufficient resources to adequately protect against, or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to, cyber incidents. It is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of them, could have adverse consequences on our business and lead to financial loss. We are also dependent, in part, upon Intermediate’s information. A failure in the security of Intermediate’s information systems could seriously harm our business and results of operations.

Holdings owns the majority of our voting stock and has the right to appoint a majority of our board members, and our interests may conflict with those of other stockholders.

Holdings owns the majority of our voting stock and is entitled to appoint the majority of our Board. As a result, Holdings is able to substantially influence matters requiring our stockholder or board approval, including the election of directors, approval of any potential acquisition of us, changes to our organizational documents and significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership makes it unlikely that any other holder or group of holders of Class A Common Stock will be able to completeaffect the way we are managed or the direction of our initial business combination withinbusiness. The interests of Holdings with respect to matters potentially or actually involving or affecting us, such as future acquisitions, financings and other corporate opportunities and attempts to acquire us, may conflict with the prescribed time frame, in which case we would cease all operations except for the purposeinterests of winding up and we would redeem our public shares and liquidate, in which case our public stockholders may only receive $10.10 per share, or less than such amount in certain circumstances, and our warrants will expire worthless.other stockholders.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we must complete our initial business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO. We may not be able to find a suitable target business and complete our initial business combination within such time period. Our ability to complete our initial business combination may be negatively impacted by general market conditions, volatility in the capital and debt markets and the other risks described herein. For example, the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) outbreak continues to grow both in the U.S. and globally and, while the extent of the impact of the outbreak on us will depend on future developments, it could limit our ability to complete our initial business combination, including as a result of increased market volatility, decreased market liquidity and third-party financing being unavailable on terms acceptable to us or at all. Additionally, the outbreak of COVID-19 may negatively impact businesses we may seek to acquire. If we have not completed our initial business combination within such time period, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the trust account (less up to $100,000 of interest released to us to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our Board, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. In such case, our public stockholders may only receive $10.10 per share, and our warrants will expire worthless. In certain circumstances, our public stockholders may receive less than $10.10 per share on the redemption of their shares. See “— If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders may be less than $10.10 per share” and other risk factors in this section.


 

If we seek stockholder approvalFor example, Holdings may have different tax positions from us, especially in light of the Tax Receivable Agreement, that could influence our decisions regarding whether and when to support the disposition of assets, the incurrence or refinancing of new or existing indebtedness, or the termination of the Tax Receivable Agreement and acceleration of our initial business combination,obligations thereunder. In addition, the determination of future tax reporting positions, the structuring of future transactions and the handling of any challenge by any taxing authority to our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliatestax reporting positions may elect to purchase sharestake into consideration tax or public warrants from public stockholders or public warrant holders,other considerations of Holdings, including the effect of such positions on our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement, which may influencediffer from the considerations of ours or other stockholders.

We may amend the terms of the warrants in a vote onmanner that may be adverse to holders of Public Warrants with the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding Public Warrants. As a proposed business combinationresult, the exercise price and reduce the public “float”exercise period of the warrants could be changed and the number of shares of our Class A common stock.Common Stock purchasable upon exercise of a warrant could be decreased, all without a holder’s approval.

If we seek stockholder approvalOur Public Warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and us. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuantthe warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder (i) to cure any ambiguity or to correct any mistake, including to conform the provisions therein to the tender offer rules, our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates may purchase shares or publicdescriptions of the terms of the warrants, or to cure, correct or supplement any defective provision, or (ii) to add or change any other provisions with respect to matters or questions arising under the warrant agreement as the parties to the warrant agreement may deem necessary or desirable and that the parties deem to not adversely affect the interests of the registered holders of the warrants. The warrant agreement requires the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding Public Warrants to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders of Public Warrants. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the Public Warrants in a combination thereof in privately negotiated transactionsmanner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding Public Warrants approve of such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms of the Public Warrants with the consent of at least 50% of the then-outstanding Public Warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase or indecrease of the open market either beforeexercise price of the warrants, convert the warrants into cash or afterstock (at a ratio different than initially provided), shorten the completion of our initial business combination, although they are under no obligation to do so. Such a purchase may include a contractual acknowledgement that such stockholder, although still the record holder of our shares is no longer the beneficial owner thereof and therefore agrees not to exercise its redemption rights. There is no limit onperiod or decrease the number of shares our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates may purchase in such transactions, subject to compliance with applicable law and the rules of NASDAQ. However, other than as expressly stated herein, they have no current commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions and have not formulated any terms or conditions for any such transactions. None of the funds in the trust account will be used to purchase shares or public warrants in such transactions. If our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions from public stockholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling stockholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares. The purpose of such purchases could be to vote such shares in favor of the business combination and thereby increase the likelihood of obtaining stockholder approval of the business combination, or to satisfy a closing condition in an agreement with a target that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash at the closing of our business combination, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise not be met. The purpose of any such purchases of shares could be to vote such shares in favor of the business combination and thereby increase the likelihood of obtaining stockholder approval of the business combination or to satisfy a closing condition in an agreement with a target that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash at the closing of our business combination, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise not be met. The purpose of any such purchases of public warrants could be to reduce the number of public warrants outstanding or to vote such warrants on any matters submitted to the warrant holders for approval in connection with our initial business combination. Any such purchases of our securities may result in the completion of our business combination that may not otherwise have been possible. Any such purchases will be reported pursuant to Section 13 and Section 16 of the Exchange Act to the extent the purchasers are subject to such reporting requirements.

In addition, if such purchases are made, the public “float” of our Class A common stock and the numberCommon Stock purchasable upon exercise of beneficial holders of our securities may be reduced, possibly making it difficult to obtain or maintain the quotation, listing or trading of our securities on a national securities exchange.warrant. 

If a stockholder fails to receive notice of our offer to redeem our public shares in connection with our business combination or fails to comply with the procedures for tendering its shares, such shares may notThere can be redeemed.

We will comply with the tender offer rules or proxy rules, as applicable, when conducting redemptions in connection with our business combination. Despite our compliance with these rules, if a stockholder fails to receive our tender offer or proxy materials, as applicable, such stockholder may not become aware of the opportunity to redeem its shares. In addition, the tender offer documents or proxy materials, as applicable, that we will furnish to holders of our public shares in connection with our initial business combination will describe the various procedures that must be complied with in order to validly tender or redeem public shares. For example, we may require our public stockholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights, whether they are record holders or hold their shares in “street name,” to either tender their certificates to our transfer agent before the date set forth in the tender offer documents or proxy materials mailed to such holders, or up to two business days before the vote on the proposal to approve the business combination in the event we distribute proxy materials, or to deliver their shares to the transfer agent electronically. If a stockholder fails to comply with these or any other procedures, its shares may not be redeemed.


You will not have any rights or interests in funds from the trust account, except under certain limited circumstances. To liquidate your investment, therefore, you may be forced to sell your public shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.

Our public stockholders will be entitled to receive funds from the trust account only upon the earliest to occur of: (i) our completion of an initial business combination, and then only in connection with those shares of our common stock that such stockholder properly elected to redeem, subject to limitations, (ii) the redemption of any public shares properly submitted in connection with a stockholder vote to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation (a) to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO or (b) relating to any other provision relating to stockholders’ rights or pre-initial business combination activity, and (iii) the redemption of our public shares if we are unable to complete an initial business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO, subject to applicable law and as further described herein. In addition, if we are unable to complete an initial business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO for any reason, compliance with Delaware law may require that we submit a plan of dissolution to our then-existing stockholders for approval before the distribution of the proceeds held in our trust account. In that case, public stockholders may be forced to wait beyond 12 months (or 18 months) from the closing of the IPO before they receive funds from our trust account. In no other circumstances will a public stockholder have any right or interest of any kind in the trust account. Holders of warrants will not have any right to the proceeds held in the trust account with respect to the warrants. Accordingly, to liquidate your investment, you may be forced to sell your public shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.

NASDAQ may delist our securities from trading on its exchange, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our securities and subject us to additional trading restrictions.

We cannot assure you that our securities will continue to be listed on NASDAQ in the future or before our initial business combination. In order to continue listing our securities on NASDAQ before our initial business combination, we must maintain certain financial, distribution and stock price levels. Generally, we must maintain a minimum amount in stockholders’ equity and a minimum number of holders of our securities.

Additionally, in connection with our initial business combination, we will be required to demonstrate compliance with NASDAQ’s initial listing requirements, which are more rigorous than NASDAQ’s continued listing requirements, in order to continue to maintain the listing of our securities on NASDAQ. For instance, our stock price would generally be required to be at least $4.00 per share. We cannot assure youassurance that we will be able to meet those initialcomply with the continued listing requirements at that time.standards of Nasdaq.

Our shares of Class A Common Stock and the Public Warrants are listed on Nasdaq under the symbols “VGAS” and “VGASW,” respectively. If NASDAQNasdaq delists our securities from trading on its exchange for failure to meet the continued listing standards, we and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, westockholders could face significant material adversenegative consequences. The consequences including:of failing to meet the listing requirements include:

a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;

reduced liquidity for our securities;

a determination that our Class A common stockCommon Stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our Class A common stockCommon Stock to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our securities;

a limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and

a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.


 

Because there are no current plans to pay cash dividends on shares of Common Stock for the foreseeable future, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your shares of Common Stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

We intend to retain future earnings, if any, for future operations, expansion and debt repayment and there are no current plans to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. The National Securities Markets Improvement Actdeclaration, amount and payment of 1996, whichany future dividends on shares of Common Stock will be at the sole discretion of our board, who may take into account general and economic conditions, our financial condition and results of operations, our available cash and current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual, legal, tax, and regulatory restrictions, implications on the payment of dividends by us to our its stockholders or by our subsidiaries to us and such other factors our board may deem relevant. In addition, our ability to pay dividends is limited by covenants of any indebtedness we incur. As a federal statute, prevents or preemptsresult, you may not receive any return on an investment in the states from regulating the saleshares of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.” Our units, Class A common stock and warrants are covered securities. Although the states are preempted from regulating the saleCommon Stock unless you sell your shares of Class A Common Stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

The trading price of our securities the federal statute does allow the statesis limited and volatile and subject to investigate companies if therewide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control.

There is a suspicion of fraud, and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate or bar the sale of covered securities in a particular case. While we are not aware of a state having used these powers to prohibit or restrict the sale of securities issued by blank check companies, other than the State of Idaho, certain state securities regulators view blank check companies unfavorably and might use these powers, or threaten to use these powers, to hinder the sale of securities of blank check companies in their states. Further, if we were no longer listed on NASDAQ,limited market for our securities would notand there can be coveredno assurance that such a market for our securities will continue. The trading price of our securities has been and we wouldmay continue to be volatile and subject to regulationwide fluctuations in each state inresponse to various factors (during the last 52 week period, range of trading has fluctuated from a high of $18.30 per share to a low of $1.95 per share), some of which we offerare beyond our securities.

You will not be entitled to protections normally afforded to investors of many other blank check companies.

Since the net proceedscontrol. Any of the IPO and the sale of the private placement warrants are intended to be used to complete an initial business combination with a target business that has not been selected, we may be deemed to be a “blank check” company under the United States securities laws. However, because we did not have net tangible assets in excess of $5,000,001 upon the successful completion of the offering and the sale of the private placement warrants and we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, including an audited balance sheet demonstrating this fact, we are exempt from rules promulgated by the SEC to protect investors in blank check companies, such as Rule 419. Accordingly, investors will not be afforded the benefits or protections of those rules. Among other things, this means our units will be immediately tradable and we willfactors listed below could have a longer period of time to complete our business combination than do companies subject to Rule 419. Moreover, if the IPO was subject to Rule 419, that rule would prohibit the release of any interest earned on funds held in the trust account to us unless and until the funds in the trust account were released to us in connection with our completion of an initial business combination.

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, and if you or a “group” of stockholders are deemed to hold in excess of 15% of our Class A common stock, you will lose the ability to redeem all such shares in excess of 15% of our Class A common stock.

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that a public stockholder, together with any affiliate of such stockholder or any other person with whom such stockholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from seeking redemption rights with respect to more than an aggregate of 15% of the shares sold in the IPO, which we refer to as the “Excess Shares.” However, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation does not restrict our stockholders’ ability to vote all of their shares (including Excess Shares) for or against our business combination. Your inability to redeem the Excess Shares will reduce your influence over our ability to complete our business combination and you could suffer a material lossadverse effect on your investment in us ifour securities and our securities may trade at prices significantly below the price you sell Excess Shares in open market transactions. Additionally, you willpaid for them. In such circumstances, the trading price of our securities may not receive redemption distributions with respect to the Excess Shares if we complete our business combination. Asrecover and may experience a result, you will continue to hold that number of shares exceeding 15% and, in order to dispose of such shares, would be required to sell your stock in open market transactions, potentially at a loss.further decline.

AsFactors affecting the number of special purpose acquisition companies evaluating targets increases, attractive targets may become scarcer and there may be more competition for attractive targets. This could increase the costtrading price of our initial business combination and could even result in our inability to find a target or to consummate an initial business combination.securities may include:

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial results or the quarterly financial results of companies perceived to be similar to us;

In recent years, the number of special purpose acquisition companies that have been formed has increased substantially. Many potential targets for special purpose acquisition companies have already entered into an initial business combination, and there are still many special purpose acquisition companies preparing for an initial public offering, as well as many such companies currently in registration. As a result, at times, fewer attractive targets may be available to consummate an initial business combination.

changes in the market’s expectations about our operating results;

success of competitors;

our operating results failing to meet the expectation of securities analysts or investors in a particular period;

changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts concerning us or the market in general;

operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us;

our ability to market new and enhanced products and technologies on a timely basis;

changes in laws and regulations affecting our business;

our ability to meet compliance requirements;

commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving us;

changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt;

the volume of shares of our common stock available for public sale;

any major change in our Board or management;

sales of substantial amounts of common stock by our directors, executive officers or significant stockholders or the perception that such sales could occur;

general economic and political conditions such as recessions, interest rates, fuel prices, international currency fluctuations and acts of war (such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the conflict in the Middle East) or terrorism.


 

In addition, because there are more special purpose acquisitionBroad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our securities irrespective of our operating performance. The stock market in general and the Nasdaq Stock Market have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the particular companies seeking to enter into an initial business combination with available targets, the competition for available targets with attractive fundamentals or business modelsaffected. The trading prices and valuations of these stocks, and of our securities, may increase, which could cause targets companies to demand improved financial terms.

Changesnot be predictable. A loss of investor confidence in the market for directors and officers liability insuranceretail stocks or the stocks of other companies which investors perceive to be similar to us could make it more difficult and more expensive for us to negotiate and complete an initialdepress our stock price regardless of our business, combination.

In recent months,prospects, financial condition or results of operations. A decline in the market for directors and officers liability insurance for special purpose acquisition companies has changed. The premiums charged for such policies have generally increased and the termsprice of such policies have generally become less favorable. There can be no assurance that these trends will not continue.

The increased cost and decreased availability of directors and officers liability insuranceour securities also could make it more difficult and more expensive for us to negotiate an initial business combination. In order to obtain directors and officers liability insurance or modify its coverage as a result of becoming a public company, the post-business combination entity might need to incur greater expense, accept less favorable terms or both. However, any failure to obtain adequate directors and officers liability insurance could have an adverse impact on the post-business combination’s ability to attract and retain qualified officers and directors.

In addition, even after we were to complete an initial business combination, our directors and officers could still be subject to potential liability from claims arising from conduct alleged to have occurred prior to the initial business combination. As a result, in order to protect our directors and officers, the post-business combination entity will likely need to purchase additional run-off insurance with respect to any such claims. The need for run-off insurance would be an added expense for the post-business combination entity, and could interfere with or frustrateadversely affect our ability to consummate an initial business combination on terms favorable to our investors.

Our search for a business combination,issue additional securities and any target business with which we ultimately consummate a business combination, may be materially adversely affected by the recent COVID-19 outbreak and the status of debt and equity markets.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China, which has and is continuing to spread throughout China and other parts of the world, including the United States. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern.” On January 31, 2020, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex M. Azar II declared a public health emergency for the United States to aid the U.S. healthcare community in responding to COVID-19, and on March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization characterized the outbreak as a “pandemic”. A significant outbreak of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases could result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets worldwide, and the business of any potential target business with which we consummate a business combination could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, we may be unable to complete a business combination if continued concerns relating to COVID-19 restrict travel, limit the ability to have meetings with potential investors or the target company’s personnel, vendors and services providers are unavailable to negotiate and consummate a transaction in a timely manner. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our search for a business combination will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. If the disruptions posed by COVID-19 or other matters of global concern continue for an extensive period of time, our ability to consummate a business combination, orobtain additional financing in the operations of a target business with which we ultimately consummate a business combination, may be materially adversely affected.future.

In addition,If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports about us, our ability to consummate a transaction may be dependent onbusiness or our market, or if they change their recommendations regarding our common stock adversely, the ability to raise equityprice and debt financing which may be impacted by COVID-19 and other related eventstrading volume of our common stock could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise adequate financing, including as a result of increased market volatility, decreased market liquidity and third-party financing being unavailable on terms acceptable to us or at all.decline.

 


Because ofThe trading market for our limited resources and the significant competition for business combination opportunities, it may be more difficult for us to complete our initial business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may receive only approximately $10.10 per share on our redemption of our public shares, or less than such amount in certain circumstances, and our warrants will expire worthless.

We expect to encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including private investors (which may be individuals or investment partnerships), other blank check companies and other entities, domestic and international, competing for the types of businesses we intend to acquire. Many of these individuals and entities are well-established and have extensive experience in identifying and effecting, directly or indirectly, acquisitions of companies operating in or providing services to various industries. Many of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources or more local industry knowledge than we do, and our financial resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we believe there are numerous target businesses we could potentially acquire with the net proceeds of the IPO and the sale of the private placement warrants, our ability to compete with respect to the acquisition of certain target businesses that are sizable will be limited by our available financial resources. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain target businesses.

Furthermore, because we are obligated to pay cash for the shares of Class A common stock that our public stockholders redeem in connection with our initial business combination, target companiesCommon Stock will be awareinfluenced by the research and reports that thisindustry or securities analysts may reducepublish about us, our business, our market or our competitors. If any of the resources available toanalysts who may cover us forchange their recommendation regarding our initial business combination. This may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating a business combination. If we are unable to completestock adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about our initial business combination, our public stockholders may receive only approximately $10.10 per share oncompetitors, the liquidationprice of our trust account and our warrants will expire worthless. In certain circumstances, our public stockholdersshares of Class A Common Stock would likely decline. If any analyst who may receive less than $10.10 per share upon our liquidation. See “If third parties bring claims againstcover us the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders may be less than $10.10 per share” and other risk factors in this section.

If the net proceeds of the IPO and the sale of the private placement warrants not being held in the trust account are insufficientwere to allow uscease their coverage or fail to operate for at least the next 12 months, we may be unable to complete our initial business combination, in which case our public stockholders may only receive $10.10 per share, or less than such amount in certain circumstances, and our warrants will expire worthless.

The funds available to us outside of the trust account may not be sufficient to allow us to operate for at least the next 12 months, assuming that our initial business combination is not completed during that time. We believe that, upon the closing of the IPO, the funds available to us outside of the trust account will be sufficient to allow us to operate for at least the next 12 months; however, we cannot assure you that our estimate is accurate. Of the funds available toregularly publish reports on us, we could use a portion of the funds available to us to pay fees to consultants to assist us with our search for a target business. We could also use a portion of the funds as a down payment or to fund a “no-shop” provision (a provision in letters of intent or merger agreements designed to keep target businesses from “shopping” around for transactions with other companies on terms more favorable to such target businesses) with respect to a particular proposed business combination, although we do not have any current intention to do so. If we entered into a letter of intent or merger agreement where we paid for the right to receive exclusivity from a target business and were subsequently required to forfeit such funds (whether as a result of our breach or otherwise), we might not have sufficient funds to continue searching for, or conduct due diligence with respect to, a target business. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may receive only approximately $10.10 per share on the liquidation of our trust account and our warrants will expire worthless. In certain circumstances, our public stockholders may receive less than $10.10 per share upon our liquidation. See “-If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds heldlose visibility in the trust accountfinancial markets, which could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders may be less than $10.10 per share” and other risk factors in this section.


If the net proceeds of the IPO and the sale of the private placement warrants not being held in the trust account are insufficient, it could limit the amount available to fund our search for a target business or businesses and complete our initial business combination and we will depend on loans from our sponsor or management team to fund our search for a business combination, to pay our franchise and income taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the trust account and to complete our initial business combination. If we are unable to obtain these loans, we may be unable to complete our initial business combination.

Of the net proceeds of the IPO and the sale of the private placement warrants, only approximately $600,000 was available to us initially outside the trust account to fund our working capital requirements. Our offering expenses of $576,438 did not exceed our estimate of $900,000. If the offering expenses had exceeded our estimate, we would fund such excess with funds not to be held in the trust account. In such case, the amount of funds we intend to be held outside the trust account would decrease by a corresponding amount. Conversely, since the offering expenses were less than our estimate of $900,000, the amount of funds we intend to be held outside the trust account would increase by a corresponding amount. If we are required to seek additional capital, we would need to withdraw interest from the trust account as described elsewhere in this Annual Report and/or borrow funds from our sponsor, management team or other third parties to operate, or we may be forced to liquidate. None of our sponsor, members of our management team, nor any of their affiliates is under any obligation to advance funds to us in such circumstances. Any such advances would be repaid only from funds held outside the trust account or from funds released to us upon completion of our initial business combination. We do not expect to seek loans from parties other than our sponsor or an affiliate of our sponsor as we do not believe third parties will be willing to loan such funds and provide a waiver against any and all rights to seek access to funds in our trust account. If we are unable to obtain these loans, we may be unable to complete our initial business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination because we do not have sufficient funds available to us, we will be forced to cease operations and liquidate the trust account. Consequently, our public stockholders may only receive approximately $10.10 per share on our redemption of our public shares, and our warrants will expire worthless. In certain circumstances, our public stockholders may receive less than $10.10 per share on the redemption of their shares. See “If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders may be less than $10.10 per share” and other risk factors in this section.

After the completion of our initial business combination, we may be required to take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations andcause our stock price which could cause youor trading volume to lose some or all of your investment.decline.

Even if we conduct extensive due diligence on a target business with which we combine, we cannot assure you that this diligence will surface all material issues that may be present inside a particular target business, that it would be possible to uncover all material issues through a customary amount of due diligence, or that factors outside of the target business and outside of our control will not later arise. As a result of these factors, we may be forced to later write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in our reporting losses. Even if our due diligence successfully identifies certain risks, unexpected risks may arise, and previously known risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with our preliminary risk analysis. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our securities. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to violate net worth or other covenants to which we may be subject as a result of assuming pre-existing debt held by a target business or by virtue of our obtaining post-combination debt financing. Accordingly, any stockholders who choose to remain stockholders following the business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their shares. Such stockholders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value.

If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders may be less than $10.10 per share.

Our placing of funds in the trust account may not protect those funds from third-party claims against us. Although we will seek to have all vendors, service providers (other than our independent auditors), prospective target businesses or other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the trust account for the benefit of our public stockholders, such parties may not execute such agreements, or even if they execute such agreements they may not be prevented from bringing claims against the trust account, including, but not limited to, fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver, in each case in order to gain advantage with respect to a claim against our assets, including the funds held in the trust account. If any third party refuses to execute an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held in the trust account, our management will perform an analysis of the alternatives available to it and will only enter into an agreement with a third party that has not executed a waiver if management believes that such third party’s engagement would be significantly more beneficial to us than any alternative. Making such a request of potential target businesses may make our acquisition proposal less attractive to them and, to the extent prospective target businesses refuse to execute such a waiver, it may limit the field of potential target businesses that we might pursue.


Examples of possible instances where we may engage a third party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third party consultant whose particular expertise or skills are believed by management to be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver. In addition, there is no guarantee that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the trust account for any reason. Upon redemption of our public shares, if we are unable to complete our business combination within the prescribed timeframe, or upon the exercise of a redemption right in connection with our business combination, we will be required to provide for payment of claims of creditors that were not waived that may be brought against us within the 10 years following redemption. Accordingly, the per-share redemption amount received by public stockholders could be less than the $10.10 per share initially held in the trust account, due to claims of such creditors. Our sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a vendor for services rendered or products sold to us, or a prospective target business with which we have discussed entering into a transaction agreement, reduce the amount of funds in the trust account to below (i) $10.10 per public share or (ii) such lesser amount per public share held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, in each case net of the interest which may be withdrawn to pay taxes as well as expenses relating to administration of the trust account. This liability will not apply with respect to any claims by a third party who executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the trust account and except as to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of the IPO against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Moreover, if an executed waiver is deemed to be unenforceable against a third party, then our sponsor will not be responsible to the extent of any liability for such third-party claims. Our sponsor does not have sufficient funds to satisfy its indemnity obligations and our sponsor’s only assets are securities of our company. We have not asked our sponsor to reserve for such indemnification obligations. Therefore, we cannot assure you that our sponsor would be able to satisfy those obligations. As a result, if any such claims were successfully made against the trust account, the funds available for our initial business combination and redemptions could be reduced to less than $10.10 per public share. In such event, we may not be able to complete our initial business combination, and you would receive such lesser amount per share in connection with any redemption of your public shares. None of our officers will indemnify us for claims by third parties including, without limitation, claims by vendors and prospective target businesses.

Our independent directors may decide not to enforce the indemnification obligations of our sponsor, resulting in a reduction in the amount of funds in the trust account available for distribution to our public stockholders.

If the proceeds in the trust account are reduced below the lesser of (i) $10.10 per public share or (ii) such lesser amount per share held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, in each case net of the interest which may be withdrawn to pay taxes as well as expenses relating to administration of the trust account, and our sponsor asserts that it is unable to satisfy its obligations or that it has no indemnification obligations related to a particular claim, our independent directors would determine whether to take legal action against our sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations.

While we currently expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf against our sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their business judgment may choose not to do so if, for example, the cost of such legal action is deemed by the independent directors to be too high relative to the amount recoverable or if the independent directors determine that a favorable outcome is not likely. If our independent directors choose not to enforce these indemnification obligations, the amount of funds in the trust account available for distribution to our public stockholders may be reduced below $10.10 per share.


We may not have sufficient funds to satisfy indemnification claims of our directors and executive officers.

We have agreed to indemnify our directors and executive officers to the fullest extent permitted by law. However, our directors and executive officers have agreed to waive any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies in the trust account and to not seek recourse against the trust account for any reason whatsoever. Accordingly, any indemnification provided will be able to be satisfied by us only if: (i) we have sufficient funds outside of the trust account or (ii) we consummate an initial business combination. Our obligation to indemnify our directors and executive officers may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors, directors and executive officers for breach of their fiduciary duties. These provisions also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against our directors and executive officers, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders. Furthermore, a stockholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against our directors and executive officers pursuant to these indemnification provisions.

If, after we distribute the proceeds in the trust account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, a bankruptcy court may seek to recover such proceeds, and we and our board may be exposed to claims of punitive damages.

If, after we distribute the proceeds in the trust account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy court could seek to recover all amounts received by our stockholders. In addition, our Board may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or having acted in bad faith, thereby exposing itself and us to claims of punitive damages, by paying public stockholders from the trust account before addressing the claims of creditors.

If, before distributing the proceeds in the trust account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the claims of creditors in such proceeding may have priority over the claims of our stockholders and the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our stockholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.

If, before distributing the proceeds in the trust account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of our stockholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our stockholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.

If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities may be restricted, which may make it difficult for us to complete our business combination.

If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, our activities may be restricted, including:

restrictions on the nature of our investments; and

restrictions on the issuance of securities, each of which may make it difficult for us to complete our business combination.

In addition, we may have imposed upon us burdensome requirements, including:

registration as an investment company;

adoption of a specific form of corporate structure; and

reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure requirements and other rules and regulations.


In order not to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, unless we can qualify for an exclusion, we must ensure that we are engaged primarily in a business other than investing, reinvesting or trading of securities and that our activities do not include investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading “investment securities” constituting more than 40% of our total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Our business will be to identify and complete a business combination and thereafter to operate the post-transaction business or assets for the long term. We do not plan to buy businesses or assets with a view to resale or profit from their resale. We do not plan to buy unrelated businesses or assets or to be a passive investor.

We do not believe that our anticipated principal activities will subject us to the Investment Company Act. To this end, the proceeds held in the trust account may only be invested in United States “government securities” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act having a maturity of 180 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act that invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations. Pursuant to the trust agreement, the trustee will not be permitted to invest in other securities or assets. By restricting the investment of the proceeds to these instruments, and by having a business plan targeted at acquiring and growing businesses for the long term (rather than on buying and selling businesses in the manner of a merchant bank or private equity fund), we intend to avoid being deemed an “investment company” within the meaning of the Investment Company Act. Investing in our securities is not intended for persons who are seeking a return on investments in government securities or investment securities. The trust account is intended as a holding place for funds pending the earliest to occur of: (i) the completion of our primary business objective, which is a business combination; (ii) the redemption of any public shares properly submitted in connection with a stockholder vote to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation (a) to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO or (b) relating to any other provisions relating to stockholders’ rights or pre-initial business combination activity; or (iii) absent a business combination, our return of the funds held in the trust account to our public stockholders as part of our redemption of the public shares. If we do not invest the proceeds as discussed above, we may be deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act. If we were deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act, compliance with these additional regulatory burdens would require additional expenses for which we have not allotted funds and may hinder our ability to complete a business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may receive only approximately $10.10 per share on the liquidation of our trust account and our warrants will expire worthless. In certain circumstances, our public stockholders may receive less than $10.10 per share on the redemption of their shares. See “-If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders may be less than $10.10 per share” and other risk factors in this section.

Changes in laws or regulations, or a failure to comply with any laws andor regulations, may adversely affect our business, including our ability to negotiate and complete our initial business combination, investments and results of operations.

We are subject to laws and regulations enacted by national, regional and local governments. In particular, we are required to comply with certain SEC and other legal requirements. Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable laws and regulations may be difficult, time consuming and costly. Those laws and regulations and their interpretation and application may also change from time to time and those changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, investments and results of operations. In addition, a failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted and applied, could have a material adverse effect on our business including our ability to negotiate and complete our initial business combination, investments and results of operations.

As a result of plans to expand our business operations, including to jurisdictions in which tax laws may not be favorable, our obligations may change or fluctuate, become significantly more complex or become subject to greater risk of examination by taxing authorities, any of which could adversely affect our after-tax profitability and financial results.

 

Our effective tax rates may fluctuate widely in the future, particularly if our business expands domestically or internationally. Future effective tax rates could be affected by operating losses in jurisdictions where no tax benefit can be recorded under GAAP, changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities, or changes in tax laws. Factors that could materially affect our future effective tax rates include, but are not limited to: (a) changes in tax laws or the regulatory environment, (b) changes in accounting and tax standards or practices, (c) changes in the composition of operating income by tax jurisdiction and (d) pre-tax operating results of our business. 

Additionally, we may be subject to significant income, withholding, and other tax obligations in the United States and may become subject to taxation in numerous additional U.S. state and local and non-U.S. jurisdictions with respect to income, operations and subsidiaries related to those jurisdictions. Our after-tax profitability and financial results could be subject to volatility or be affected by numerous factors, including (a) the availability of tax deductions, credits, exemptions, refunds and other benefits to reduce tax liabilities, (b) changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, if any, (c) the expected timing and amount of the release of any tax valuation allowances, (d) the tax treatment of stock-based compensation, (e) changes in the relative amount of earnings subject to tax in the various jurisdictions, (f) the potential business expansion into, or otherwise becoming subject to tax in, additional jurisdictions, (g) changes to existing intercompany structure (and any costs related thereto) and business operations, (h) the extent of intercompany transactions and the extent to which taxing authorities in relevant jurisdictions respect those intercompany transactions and (i) the ability to structure business operations in an efficient and competitive manner. Outcomes from audits or examinations by taxing authorities could have an adverse effect on our after-tax profitability and financial condition. Additionally, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and several foreign tax authorities have increasingly focused attention on intercompany transfer pricing with respect to sales of products and services and the use of intangibles. Tax authorities could disagree with our intercompany charges, cross-jurisdictional transfer pricing or other matters and assess additional taxes. If we do not prevail in any such disagreements, our financial results may be affected.


 

Our after-tax profitability and financial results may also be adversely affected by changes in relevant tax laws and tax rates, treaties, regulations, administrative practices and principles, judicial decisions and interpretations thereof, in each case, possibly with retroactive effect.

We are a holding company, and our only material asset is our equity interest in OpCo, and we will accordingly be dependent upon distributions from OpCo to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and cover our corporate and other overhead expenses.

 

We are a holding company and have no material assets other than our equity interest in OpCo. We have no independent means of generating revenue. To the extent OpCo has available cash, we intend to cause OpCo to make (i) generally pro rata distributions to the holders of OpCo Units, including us, in an amount at least sufficient to allow us to pay our taxes and make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and any subsequent tax receivable agreement that we may enter into in connection with future acquisitions and (ii) non-pro rata payments to us to reimburse us for our corporate and other overhead expenses. To the extent that we need funds and OpCo or its subsidiaries are restricted from making such distributions or payments under applicable law or regulation or under the terms of any current or future financing arrangements, or are otherwise unable to provide such funds, our liquidity and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Moreover, because we have no independent means of generating revenue, our ability to make tax payments and payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be dependent on the ability of OpCo to make distributions to us in an amount sufficient to cover our tax obligations (and those of its wholly owned subsidiaries) and obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement. This ability, in turn, may depend on the ability of OpCo’s subsidiaries to make distributions to it. We intend that such distributions from OpCo and its subsidiaries be funded with cash from operations or from future borrowings. The ability of OpCo, its subsidiaries and other entities in which it directly or indirectly holds an equity interest to make such distributions will be subject to, among other things, (i) the applicable provisions of Delaware law (or other applicable jurisdiction) that may limit the amount of funds available for distribution and (ii) restrictions in relevant debt instruments issued by OpCo or its subsidiaries and other entities in which it directly or indirectly holds an equity interest. To the extent that we are unable to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for any reason, such payments will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid.

Our stockholdersWe will be required to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for certain tax benefits that it may claim, and the amounts of such payments could be held liablesignificant.

In connection with the Business Combination, we entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement with the TRA Holders. This agreement generally provides for claimsthe payment by third parties against us to the extentTRA Holders of distributions received by them upon redemption85% of their shares.the net cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax and franchise tax (computed using simplifying assumptions to address the impact of state and local taxes) that we actually realize (or are deemed to realize in certain circumstances) in periods after the Business Combination as a result of certain increases in tax basis available to us pursuant to the exercise of the OpCo Exchange Right, a Mandatory Exchange or the Call Right and certain benefits attributable to imputed interest. We will retain the benefit of the remaining 15% of any actual net cash tax savings.

UnderThe term of the DGCL, stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against a corporationTax Receivable Agreement will continue until all tax benefits that are subject to the extentTax Receivable Agreement have been utilized or expired, unless we experience a change of distributions received by themcontrol (as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement, which includes certain mergers, asset sales, or other forms of business combinations) or the Tax Receivable Agreement otherwise terminates early (at our election or as a dissolution. The pro rata portionresult of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders uponbreach or the redemptioncommencement of our public sharesbankruptcy or similar proceedings by or against us), and we make the termination payments specified in the event we do not complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time period may be considered a liquidating distribution under Delaware law. If a corporation compliesTax Receivable Agreement in connection with certain procedures set forth in Section 280such change of the DGCL intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision for all claims against it, including a 60-day notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought against the corporation, a 90-day period during which the corporation may reject any claims brought, and an additional 150-day waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claimcontrol or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution. However, it is our intention to redeem our public shares as soon as reasonably possible following the 24th month from the closing of the IPO in the event we do not complete our business combination and, therefore, we do not intend to comply with the foregoing procedures.other early termination. 

Because we will not be complying with Section 280, Section 281(b) of the DGCL requires us to adopt a plan, based on facts known to us at such time that will provide for our payment of all existing and pending claims or claims that may be potentially brought against us within the 10 years following our dissolution. However, because we are a blank check company, rather than an operating company, and our operations will be limited to searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from our vendors (such as lawyers, investment bankers, etc.) or prospective target businesses. If our plan of distribution complies with Section 281(b) of the DGCL, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would likely be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution. We cannot assure you that we will properly assess all claims that may be potentially brought against us. As such, our stockholders could potentially be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received by them (but no more) and any liability of our stockholders may extend beyond the third anniversary of such date. Furthermore, if the pro rata portion of our trust account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares in the event we do not complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame is not considered a liquidating distribution under Delaware law and such redemption distribution is deemed to be unlawful, then pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL, the statute of limitations for claims of creditors could then be six years after the unlawful redemption distribution, instead of three years, as in the case of a liquidating distribution.

We may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders until after the consummation of our initial business combination, which could delay the opportunity for our stockholders to elect directors.

In accordance with NASDAQ corporate governance requirements, we are not required to hold an annual meeting until no later than one year after our first fiscal year end following our listing on NASDAQ. Under Section 211(b) of the DGCL, we are, however, required to hold an annual meeting of stockholders for the purposes of electing directors in accordance with our bylaws unless such election is made by written consent in lieu of such a meeting. We may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders to elect new directors before the consummation of our initial business combination, and thus we may not be in compliance with Section 211(b) of the DGCL, which requires an annual meeting. Therefore, if our stockholders want us to hold an annual meeting before the consummation of our initial business combination, they may attempt to force us to hold one by submitting an application to the Delaware Court of Chancery in accordance with Section 211(c) of the DGCL.


 

The payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement are our obligations and not obligations of OpCo, and we expect that the payments required to be made under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be substantial. Estimating the amount and timing of payments that may become due under the Tax Receivable Agreement is by its nature imprecise. For purposes of the Tax Receivable Agreement, net cash tax savings generally are calculated by comparing our actual tax liability (determined by using the actual applicable U.S. federal income tax rate and an assumed combined state and local income and franchise tax rate) to the amount we would have been required to pay had it not been able to utilize any of the tax benefits subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement. The actual increases in tax basis covered by the Tax Receivable Agreement, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, will vary depending on a number of factors, including the timing of any redemption of Class C OpCo Units, the price of our Class A Common Stock at the time of each redemption, the extent to which such redemptions are taxable transactions, the amount of the redeeming OpCo unitholder’s tax basis in its Class C OpCo Units at the time of the relevant redemption, the depreciation and amortization periods that apply to the increase in tax basis, the amount and timing of taxable income we generate in the future, the U.S. federal income tax rates then applicable, and the portion of our payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement that constitute imputed interest or give rise to depreciable or amortizable tax basis. The Tax Receivable Agreement contains a payment cap of $50,000,000, which applies only to certain payments required to be made in connection with the occurrence of a change of control. The Payment Cap would not be reduced or offset by any amounts previously paid under the Tax Receivable Agreement or any amounts that are required to be paid (but have not yet been paid) for the year in which the change of control occurs or any prior years. Any distributions made by OpCo to us in order to enable us to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, as well as any corresponding pro rata distributions made to the OpCo unitholders, could have an adverse impact on our liquidity.

The payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will not be conditioned upon a TRA Holder having a continued ownership interest in us or OpCo.

In certain cases, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may be accelerated and/or significantly exceed the actual benefits, if any, we realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement.

 

We are not registeringIf we experience a change of control (as defined under the sharesTax Receivable Agreement, which includes certain mergers, asset sales and other forms of Class A common stock issuable upon exercisebusiness combinations) or the Tax Receivable Agreement otherwise terminates early (at our election or as a result of our breach or the commencement of bankruptcy or similar proceedings by or against us), our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement would accelerate and we would be required to make an immediate payment equal to the present value of the warrantsanticipated future payments to be made by it under the Securities ActTax Receivable Agreement and such payment is expected to be substantial. The calculation of anticipated future payments would be based upon certain assumptions and deemed events set forth in the Tax Receivable Agreement, including (i) that we have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the tax benefits covered by the Tax Receivable Agreement, and (ii) that any OpCo Units (other than those held by us) outstanding on the termination date are deemed to be redeemed on the termination date. If we were to experience a change of control, we estimate that the early termination payment, calculated on the basis of the above assumptions, would be approximately $32 million (calculated using a discount rate equal to (i) the greater of (A) 0.25% and (B) the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), plus (ii) 150 basis points, applied against an undiscounted liability of $48 million based on the 21% U.S. federal corporate income tax rate and estimated applicable state and local income tax rates). The foregoing amount is merely an estimate and the actual payment could differ materially. In connection with a change of control, any early termination payment would be subject to the Payment Cap of $50,000,000. The Payment Cap would not be reduced or offset by any amounts previously paid under the Tax Receivable Agreement or any state securities laws at this time, and such registration mayamounts that are required to be paid (but have not beyet been paid) for the year in place when an investor desires to exercise warrants, thus precluding such investor from being able to exercise its warrants except on a cashless basis and potentially causing such warrants to expire worthless.which the change of control occurs or any prior years.

We are not registeringAny early termination payment may be made significantly in advance of, and may materially exceed, the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exerciseactual realization, if any, of the warrants underfuture tax benefits to which the Securities Acttermination payment relates. Moreover, the obligation to make an early termination payment upon a change of control could have a substantial negative impact on our liquidity and could have the effect of delaying, deferring or any state securities laws at this time. However, under the termspreventing certain mergers, asset sales, or other forms of the warrant agreement, we will use our reasonable best efforts to file, and within 60 business days following our initial business combination to have declared effective, a registration statement under the Securities Act covering such shares and maintain a current prospectus relating to the Class A common stock issuable upon exercisecombinations or changes of the warrants, until the expiration of the warrants in accordance with the provisions of the warrant agreement. We cannot assure youcontrol.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to do so if, for example, any facts or events arise which represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement or prospectus, the financial statements contained or incorporated by reference therein are not current or correct or the SEC issues a stop order. If the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registeredsatisfy our obligations under the Securities Act within the required period, holders will be permitted to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis until such time as there is an effective registration statement and during any period when we shall have failed to maintain an effective registration statement. However, no warrant will be exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis, and we will not be obligated to issue any shares to holders seeking to exercise their warrants, unless the issuance of the shares upon such exercise is registered or qualified under the securities laws of the state of the exercising holder, or an exemption from registration is available. Notwithstanding the above, if our Class A common stock is at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that it satisfies the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, we may, at our option, require holders of public warrants who exercise their warrants to do so on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement, but we will be required to use our best efforts to register or qualify the shares under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available. In no event will we be required to net cash settle any warrant. If the issuance of the shares upon exercise of the warrants is not so registered or qualified or exempt from registration or qualification, the holder of such warrant shall not be entitled to exercise such warrant and such warrant may have no value and expire worthless. In such event, holders who acquired their warrants as part of a purchase of units will have paid the full unit purchase price solely for the shares of Class A common stock included in the units. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying shares of Class A common stock for sale under all applicable state securities laws.Tax Receivable Agreement.

The grant of registration rights to our initial stockholders and the anchor investors may make it more difficult to complete our initial business combination, and the future exercise of such rights may adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.

Pursuant to an agreement to be entered into concurrently with the issuance and sale of the securities in the IPO, our initial stockholders, the anchor investors, and their permitted transferees can demand that we register their founder shares, after those shares convert to our Class A common stock at the time of our initial business combination. In addition, holders of our private placement warrants and their permitted transferees can demand that we register the private placement warrants and the Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the private placement warrants, and holders of warrants that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans may demand that we register such warrants or the Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of such warrants. In addition, the existence of the registration rights may make our initial business combination more costly or difficult to conclude. This is because the shareholders of the target business may increase the equity stake they seek in the combined entity or ask for more cash consideration to offset the negative impact on the market price of our Class A common stock that is expected when the common stock owned by our initial stockholders, holders of our private placement warrants, or holders of our working capital loans or their respective permitted transferees are registered.


 

In the event that payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement are accelerated in connection with certain mergers, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control, the consideration payable to holders of our Class A Common Stock could be substantially reduced.

 

We ratifiedIf we experience a change of control (as defined under the Tax Receivable Agreement, which includes certain action pursuantmergers, asset sales and other forms of business combinations), we would be obligated to Section 204make a substantial immediate lump-sum payment, and such payment may be significantly in advance of, and may materially exceed, the actual realization, if any, of the DGCL and filedfuture tax benefits to which the payment relates; provided that any such payment would be subject to the Payment Cap of $50,000,000, which applies only to certain payments required to be made under the Tax Receivable Agreement in connection with the occurrence of a Certificatechange of Validation.

control. The Payment Cap would not be reduced or offset by any amounts previously paid under the Tax Receivable Agreement or any amounts that are required to be paid (but have not yet been paid) for the year in which the change of control occurs or any prior years. As parta result of this payment obligation, holders of our preparation forClass A Common Stock could receive substantially less consideration in connection with a change of control transaction than they would receive in the IPO, on February 10, 2021, our Board and sole stockholder ratified certain actions pursuant to Section 204absence of such obligation. Further, any payment obligations under the DGCL (“Section 204”), which allowsTax Receivable Agreement will not be conditioned upon the TRA Holders’ having a Delaware corporation to ratify a defective corporate act retroactive tocontinued interest in us or OpCo. Accordingly, the date the corporate act was originally taken. The Section 204 ratification (the “Ratification”) was taken out as a purely technical matter in order to correct certain failuresTRA Holders’ interests may conflict with those of authorization and thereby remove any uncertainty and confirm the valid issuance of the founder shares effective December 31, 2020. To effect the Ratification, the Board identified and ratified: (1) the issuance of the founder shares on or as of December 31, 2020, because (a) the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “A&R Certificate”) that authorized the founder shares was filed on January 26, 2021, and (b) the unanimous written consent of the Board approving the issuance of the founder shares, which was intended to be effective as of December 31, 2020, was not executed until January 21, 2021; (2) the effectiveness the A&R Certificate as of December 31, 2020, because (a) the A&R Certificate recited that it was approved pursuant to Sections 228 and 242 of the DGCL, but the A&R Certificate should have instead recited that it was approved pursuant to Sections 241 and 245 of the DGCL; and (b) the A&R Certificate was not effective on December 31, 2020, because the Board authorization approving its filing was on January 21, 2021 and the A&R Certificate was filed on January 26, 2021. Consequently, in accordance with Section 204, the Board ratified the filing of the A&R Certificate effective as of December 31, 2020, and the issuance of the founder shares immediately thereafter effective as of December 31, 2020 (the effectiveness of the A&R Certificate and the issuance of the founder shares, as of December 31, 2020, collectively, the “Corporate Acts”). Thereafter, in accordance with Section 204 we gave prompt written notice of the Ratification to all the holders of putative and valid stock asour Class A Common Stock. Please read “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Company—In certain cases, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may be accelerated and/or significantly exceed the actual benefits, if any, we realize in respect of the datetax attributes subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement.” 

We will not be reimbursed for any payments made under the Tax Receivable Agreement in the event that any tax benefits are subsequently disallowed.

Payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that we will determine. The IRS or another taxing authority may challenge all or part of the Corporate Actstax basis increases covered by the Tax Receivable Agreement, as well as other related tax positions we take, and asa court could sustain such challenge. The TRA Holders will not reimburse us for any payments previously made under the Tax Receivable Agreement if any tax benefits that have given rise to payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement are subsequently disallowed, except that excess payments made to any TRA Holder will be netted against future payments that would otherwise be made to such TRA Holder, if any, after our determination of such excess (which determination may be made a number of years following the record date of the consent, which was our sole stockholder, the Sponsor, which was the sole owner of validinitial payment and putative stock. Our sole stockholder consented to the Ratification of all the Corporate Acts on February 10, 2021. Accordingly, on February 24, 2021, the Certificate of Validation was filed giving retroactive effect to the Corporate Acts effective as of December 31, 2020, thereby eliminating any question as to the validity of the Corporate Acts as of December 31, 2020.

Under Section 205 of the DGCL any claim that any corporate act described above is void or voidable due to the failure of authorization, or that the Delaware Court of Chancery should declare in its discretion that the ratification thereof in accordance with Section 204 of the DGCL not be effective or be effective only on certain conditions, must be brought within 120 days from the validation effective time (which in this case is February 24, 2021). The Board and the Sponsor have both consented to the ratification and the effectiveness of the Corporate Acts and have treated the issuance of the founder shares as effective as of December 31, 2020. While Section 205 does not expressly state that a plaintiff seeking to challenge a ratification under Section 204 or the corporate acts ratified under Section 204 mustafter future payments have been made). As a record or beneficial holder as of the validation effective time,result, in such circumstances, we interpret the reference in Section 205 to “any record or beneficial holder of valid stock or putative” stock to confer standing only on persons who were record or beneficial holders as of the ratification effective time. But evencould make payments that are greater than our actual cash tax savings, if this language were deemed to give a right of action to purchasers of stock after the filing of the Certificate of Validation,any, and we believe that no purchaser who acquires a record or beneficial interest in shares of our company after the ratification of the issuance of the founder shares willmay not be able to show any injury sufficientrecoup those payments, which could materially adversely affect our liquidity.

If OpCo were to challengebecome a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we and OpCo might be subject to potentially significant tax inefficiencies, and we would not be able to recover payments previously made by us under the ratification under Section 205Tax Receivable Agreement even if the corresponding tax benefits were subsequently determined to have been unavailable due to such status.

We intend to operate such that OpCo does not become a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A “publicly traded partnership” is a partnership the interests of the DGCL. We also believe that no subsequent purchaser would have the standing required under Section 327 of the DGCL to bringwhich are traded on an established securities market or are readily tradable on a derivative action on behalf of the company challenging the Ratificationsecondary market or the Corporate Acts, because DGCL Section 327 requiressubstantial equivalent thereof. Under certain circumstances, the exchange of Class C OpCo Units pursuant to the OpCo Exchange Right or Mandatory Exchange (or acquisitions of Class C OpCo Units pursuant to the Call Right) or other transfers of Class C OpCo Units could cause OpCo to be treated as a derivative plaintiffpublicly traded partnership. Applicable U.S. Treasury regulations provide for certain safe harbors from treatment as a publicly traded partnership, and we intend to allegeoperate such that redemptions or other transfers of OpCo Units qualify for one or more of such safe harbors. For example, we limited the number of holders of OpCo Units, and the OpCo operating agreement (“A&R LLC Agreement”), provides for certain limitations on the ability of holders of OpCo Units to transfer their OpCo Units and provides us, as the manager of OpCo, with the right to prohibit the exercise of an OpCo Exchange Right if it was a stockholderdetermines (based on the advice of the company at the time of the ratification (or thereafter succeeded to shares by operation of law). Last, in these circumstances, we believe that a person challenging the Ratification, or the Corporate Acts, would have a difficult time establishing an equitable basis to invalidate or limit the Ratification or the Corporate Acts. Nonetheless,counsel) there is a possibilitymaterial risk that OpCo would be a court could upholdpublicly traded partnership as a challenge to the Ratification or to the Corporate Acts and if it did, it could adversely affect our ability to complete a business combination.result of such exercise.

BecauseIf OpCo were to become a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, significant tax inefficiencies might result for us and for OpCo, including as a result of our inability to file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return with OpCo. In addition, we aremight not limitedbe able to a particular industry, sector orrealize tax benefits covered under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and we would not be able to recover any specific target businesses with whichpayments previously made by us under the Tax Receivable Agreement, even if the corresponding tax benefits (including any claimed increase in the tax basis of OpCo’s assets) were subsequently determined to pursue our initial business combination, you will be unable to ascertain the merits or risks of any particular target business’ operations.have been unavailable.

Although we expect to focus our search for a target business in the energy industry in North America, we may seek to complete a business combination with an operating company in any industry or sector. However, we will not, under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, be permitted to complete our business combination with another blank check company or similar company with nominal operations. Because we have not yet selected any specific target business with respect to a business combination, there is no basis to evaluate the possible merits or risks of any particular target business’s operations, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition or prospects. To the extent we complete our business combination, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business operations with which we combine. For example, if we combine with a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of revenues or earnings, we may be affected by the risks inherent in the business and operations of a financially unstable or a development stage entity. Although our officers and directors will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all the significant risk factors or that we will have adequate time to complete due diligence. Furthermore, some of these risks may be outside of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact a target business. We also cannot assure you that an investment in our units will ultimately prove to be more favorable to investors than a direct investment, if such opportunity were available, in a business combination target. Accordingly, any stockholders who choose to remain stockholders following the business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their shares. Such stockholders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value.


 

In certain circumstances, OpCo will be required to make tax distributions to the OpCo unitholders, including us, and the tax distributions that OpCo will be required to make may be substantial. The OpCo tax distribution requirement may complicate our ability to maintain our intended capital structure.

OpCo will generally make quarterly tax distributions to the OpCo unitholders, including us. Such distributions will be pro rata and be in an amount sufficient to cause each OpCo unitholder to receive a distribution at least equal to (i) such OpCo unitholder’s allocable share of net taxable income (in the case of each OpCo unitholder other than us, taking into account prior normal operating pro rata distributions made to such OpCo unitholders in such year and calculated under certain assumptions), and (ii) with respect to us, any payments required to be made by us under the Tax Receivable Agreement or any similar subsequent tax receivable agreements that it may enter into in connection with future acquisitions (in each case, calculated under certain assumptions) multiplied by an assumed tax rate. The assumed tax rate for this purpose will be the combined maximum U.S. federal, state, and local rate of tax applicable to us for the applicable taxable year unless otherwise determined by OpCo. As a result of certain assumptions in calculating the tax distribution payments, we may receive tax distributions from OpCo in excess of its actual tax liability and its obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement.

The receipt of such excess distributions would complicate our ability to maintain certain aspects of our capital structure. Such cash, if retained, could cause the value of a Class A OpCo Unit to deviate from the value of a share of Class A Common Stock. If we retain such cash balances, the holders of Class C OpCo Units would benefit from any value attributable to such accumulated cash balances as a result of their exercise of the OpCo Exchange Right, a Mandatory Exchange or the Call Right. We intend to take steps to eliminate any material cash balances. Such steps could include distributing such cash balances as dividends on our Class A Common Stock and reinvesting such cash balances in OpCo for additional Class A OpCo Units (with an accompanying stock dividend with respect to our Class A Common Stock or an adjustment to the one-to-one exchange ratio applicable to the exercise of the OpCo Exchange Right, a Mandatory Exchange or the Call Right).

The tax distributions to the OpCo unitholders may be substantial and may, in the aggregate, exceed the amount of taxes that OpCo would have paid if it were a similarly situated corporate taxpayer. Funds used by OpCo to satisfy its tax distribution obligations will generally not be available for reinvestment in its business.

General Risk Factors

Changes in tax laws or the imposition of new or increased taxes may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Because we intendWe are a U.S. corporation and thus are subject to seek a business combination with a target businessU.S. corporate income tax on our worldwide income. Further, our operations and customers will be located in the energy industry in North America,United States, and, as a result, we expect our future operations towill be subject to risks associated with this sector.various U.S. federal, state and local taxes. U.S. federal, state and local and non-U.S. tax laws, policies, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be interpreted, changed, modified or applied adversely to us and may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We intend to focus our search for a target businessFor example, in the energy industryUnited States, several tax law changes have been previously proposed that would, if ultimately enacted, impact the U.S. federal income taxation of corporations. Such proposals have included an increase in North America. Because we have not yet identifiedthe U.S. income tax rate applicable to corporations (such as us) from 21% to 28%. It is unclear whether this, similar or approachedother changes will be enacted and, if enacted, how soon any specific target business,such changes could take effect, and we cannot provide specific riskspredict how any future changes in tax laws might affect us. Additionally, states in which we operate or own assets may impose new or increased taxes. Changes in tax laws or the imposition of new or increased taxes could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The new 1% U.S. federal excise tax on repurchases of corporate stock included in the IR Act could cause a reduction in the value of our Class A Common Stock.

On August 16, 2022, the IR Act was signed into law. The IR Act provides for, among other changes, a new 1% U.S. federal excise tax on certain repurchases of stock by publicly traded U.S. corporations after December 31, 2022. The excise tax is imposed on the repurchasing corporation itself, not on its stockholders from whom the shares are repurchased. The amount of the excise tax is generally 1% of any business combination. However, risks inherent in investments inpositive difference between the energy industry include, but are not limited to,fair market value of any shares repurchased by the following:repurchasing corporation during a taxable year and the fair market value of certain new stock issuances by the repurchasing corporation during the same taxable year.

volatility of oil, natural gas and product prices. For instance, escalating tensions resulting from the Russian invasion of Ukraine could lead to increased volatility in global oil and gas prices, including due to increases in oil production by Russia to finance its activities in Ukraine or to destabilize global oil and gas prices;

In addition, a number of exceptions will apply to this excise tax. The U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) has been given authority to provide regulations and other guidance to carry out, and prevent the abuse or avoidance of, this excise tax.

price and availability of alternative or renewable fuels, such as solar, coal, nuclear and wind energy;

significant federal, state and local regulation, taxation and regulatory approval processes as well as changes in applicable laws and regulations;

denial or delay of receiving requisite regulatory approvals and/or permits;

the speculative nature of and high degree of risk involved in investments in the upstream, midstream, energy services and energy transition sectors, including relying on estimates of oil and gas reserves and the impacts of regulatory and tax changes;

exploration and development risks, which could lead to environmental damage, injury and loss of life or the destruction of property;

drilling, exploration and development risks, including encountering unexpected formations or pressures, premature declines of reservoirs, blow-outs, equipment failures and other accidents, cratering, sour gas releases, uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas or well fluids, adverse weather conditions, pollution, fires, spills and other environmental risks, any of which could lead to environmental damage, injury and loss of life or the destruction of property;

proximity and capacity of oil, natural gas and other transportation and support infrastructure to production facilities;

availability of key inputs, such as strategic consumables and raw materials and drilling and processing equipment;

available pipeline, storage, feedstock and offtake, and other transportation capacity;

changes in global supply and demand and prices for commodities;

impact of energy conservation efforts;

technological advances affecting energy production and consumption;

overall domestic and global economic conditions;

availability of, and potential disputes with, independent contractors;


 

adverse weather conditions, natural disasters or other events (such as equipment malfunctions, explosions, fires or spills);

value of U.S. dollar relative to the currencies of other countries; and

terrorist acts.

Past performance by our management team and members of our Board may not be indicative of future performance of an investment in us.

Information regarding performance by, or businesses associated with our management team and members of our Board is presented for informational purposes only. Past performance by such individuals is not a guarantee either (i) of success with respect to any business combination we may consummate or (ii) that we will be able to locate a suitable candidate for our initial business combination. You should not rely on the historical record of performance of our management team and members of our Board as indicative of our future performance of an investment in us or the returns we will, or are likely to, generate going forward. Additionally, in the course of their respective careers, members of our management team and Board have been involved in businesses and deals that were ultimately unsuccessful.

We may seek acquisition opportunities in industries or sectors which may or may not be outside of our management’s area of expertise.

We will consider a business combination outside of our management’s area of expertise if a business combination candidate is presented to us and we determine that such candidate offers an attractive acquisition opportunity for our company. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in any particular business combination candidate, we cannot assure you that we will adequately ascertain or assess all the significant risk factors. We also cannot assure you that an investment in our units will not ultimately prove to be less favorable to investors in the IPO than a direct investment, if an opportunity were available, in a business combination candidate. In the event we elect to pursue an acquisition outside of the areas of our management’s expertise, our management’s expertise may not be directly applicable to its evaluation or operation, and the information contained in this Annual Report regarding the areas of our management’s expertise would not be relevant to an understanding of the business that we elect to acquire. As a result, our management may not be able to adequately ascertain or assess all the significant risk factors. Accordingly, any stockholders who choose to remain stockholders following our business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their shares. Such stockholders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value.

Although we have identified general criteria and guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective target businesses, we may enter into our initial business combination with a target that does not meet such criteria and guidelines, and as a result, the target business with which we enter into our initial business combination may not have attributes entirely consistent with our general criteria and guidelines.

Although we have identified general criteria and guidelines for evaluating prospective target businesses, it is possible that a target business with which we enter into our initial business combination will not have all of these positive attributes. If we complete our initial business combination with a target that does not meet some or all of these criteria and guidelines, such combination may not be as successful as a combination with a business that does meet all of our general criteria and guidelines. In addition, if we announce a prospective business combination with a target that does not meet our general criteria and guidelines, a greater number of stockholders may exercise their redemption rights, which may make it difficult forThe JOBS Act permits “emerging growth companies” like us to meet any closing condition with a target business that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. In addition, if stockholder approval of the transaction is required by law, or we decide to obtain stockholder approval for business or other legal reasons, it may be more difficult for us to attain stockholder approval of our initial business combination if the target business does not meet our general criteria and guidelines. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may receive only approximately $10.10 per share, or less in certain circumstances, on the liquidation of our trust account and our warrants will expire worthless. In certain circumstances, our public stockholders may receive less than $10.10 per share on the redemption of their shares. See “If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders may be less than $10.10 per share” and other risk factors in this section.


We may seek acquisition opportunities with an early stage company, a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of revenue or earnings, which could subject us to volatile revenues or earnings or difficulty in retaining key personnel.

To the extent we complete our initial business combination with an early stage company, a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of revenues or earnings, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the operations of the business with which we combine. These risks include investing in a business without a proven business model and with limited historical financial data, volatile revenues or earnings and difficulties in obtaining and retaining key personnel. Although our officers and directors will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, we may not be able to properly ascertain or assess all the significant risk factors and we may not have adequate time to complete due diligence. Furthermore, some of these risks may be outside of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact a target business.

We are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm or from an independent accounting firm, and consequently, you may have no assurance from an independent source that the price we are paying for the business is fair to our company from a financial point of view.

Unless we complete our business combination with an affiliated entity or our board cannot independently determine the fair market value of the target business or businesses, we are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that is a member of FINRA or from an independent accounting firm that the price we are paying is fair to our company from a financial point of view. If no opinion is obtained, our stockholders will be relying on the judgment of our Board, who will determine fair market value based on standards generally accepted by the financial community. Such standards used will be disclosed in our proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, related to our initial business combination.

Our independent registered public accounting firm’s report contains an explanatory paragraph that expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a “going concern.”

As of December 31, 2021, we had $505,518 in cash and working capital of $487,083. Further, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur significant costs in pursuit of an initial business combination.

We cannot assure you that our plans to raise capital or to consummate an initial business combination will be successful. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, which could impact our business plan. The financial statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report do not include any adjustments that might result from our inability to continue as a going concern.

We may issue additional shares of common stock or preferred stock to complete our initial business combination and may issue shares of common stock or preferred stock under an employee incentive plan after completion of our initial business combination. We may also issue shares of Class A common stock upon the conversion of the Class B common stock at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our initial business combination as a result of the anti-dilution provisions contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Any such issuances would dilute the interest of our stockholders and likely present other risks.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 200,000,000 shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 20,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share.

There are no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. Shares of Class B common stock are convertible into shares of our Class A common stock initially at a one-for-one ratio but subject to adjustment as set forth herein, including in certain circumstances in which we issue Class A common stock or equity-linked securities related to our initial business combination.


We may issue a substantial number of additional shares of common or preferred stock to complete our initial business combination (including pursuant to a specified future issuance). After the completion of our initial business combination, we may issue a substantial number of additional shares of common stock or preferred stock under an employee incentive plan. We may also issue shares of Class A common stock upon conversion of the Class B common stock at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our initial business combination as a result of the anti-dilution provisions contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. However, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides, among other things, that before our initial business combination, we may not issue additional shares of capital stock that would entitle the holders thereof to (i) receive funds from the trust account or (ii) vote on any initial business combination. The issuance of additional shares of common or preferred stock:

may significantly dilute the equity interest of investors in the IPO;

may subordinate the rights of holders of common stock if preferred stock is issued with rights senior to those afforded our common stock;

could cause a change of control if a substantial number of shares of our common stock are issued, which may affect, among other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation or removal of our present officers and directors; and

may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our units, Class A common stock and/or warrants.

Resources could be wasted in researching acquisitions that are not completed, which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another business. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may receive only approximately $10.10 per share, or less than such amount in certain circumstances, on the liquidation of our trust account and our warrants will expire worthless.

We anticipate that the investigation of each specific target business and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys and others. If we decide not to complete a specific initial business combination, the costs incurred up to that point for the proposed transaction likely would not be recoverable. Furthermore, if we reach an agreement relating to a specific target business, we may fail to complete our initial business combination for any number of reasons including those beyond our control. Any such event will result in a loss to us of the related costs incurred which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another business. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may receive only approximately $10.10 per share on the liquidation of our trust account and our warrants will expire worthless. In certain circumstances, our public stockholders may receive less than $10.10 per share on the redemption of their shares. See “If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders may be less than $10.10 per share” and other risk factors in this section.

Risks Relating to our Sponsor and Management Team

We are dependent upon our officers and directors, and their loss could adversely affect our ability to operate.

Our operations are dependent upon a relatively small group of individuals and, in particular, our officers and directors. We believe that our success depends on the continued service of our officers and directors, at least until we have completed our initial business combination. In addition, our officers and directors are not required to commit any specified amount of time to our affairs and, accordingly, will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time among various business activities, including identifying potential business combinations and monitoring the related due diligence.


We do not have an employment agreement with, or key-man insurance on the life of, any of our directors or officers. The unexpected loss of the services of one or more of our directors or officers could have a detrimental effect on us.

Our ability to successfully complete our initial business combination and to be successful thereafter will be totally dependent upon the efforts of members of our management team, some of whom may not join us following our initial business combination. The loss of such people could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.

Our ability to successfully complete our business combination is dependent upon the efforts of members of our management team. The role of members of our management team in the target business, however, cannot presently be ascertained. Although some members of our management team may remain with the target business in senior management or advisory positions following our business combination, it is likely that some or all of the management of the target business will remain in place. While we intend to closely scrutinize any individuals we engage after our initial business combination, we cannot assure you that our assessment of these individuals will prove to be correct. These individuals may be unfamiliar with the requirements of operating a company regulated by the SEC, which could cause us to have to expend time and resources helping them become familiar with such requirements.

In addition, the officers and directors of an acquisition candidate may resign upon completion of our initial business combination. The departure of a business combination target’s key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business. The role of an acquisition candidate’s key personnel upon the completion of our initial business combination cannot be ascertained at this time. Although we contemplate that certain members of an acquisition candidate’s management team will remain associated with the acquisition candidate following our initial business combination, it is possible that members of the management of an acquisition candidate will not wish to remain in place. The loss of key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.

Members of our management team may negotiate employment or consulting agreements with a target business in connection with a particular business combination. These agreements may provide for them to receive compensation following our business combination and as a result, may cause them to have conflicts of interest in determining whether a particular business combination is the most advantageous.

Members of our management team may be able to remain with the company after the completion of our business combination only if they are able to negotiate employment or consulting agreements in connection with the business combination. Such negotiations could take place simultaneously with the negotiation of the business combination and could provide for such individuals to receive compensation in the form of cash payments and/or our securities for services they would render to us after the completion of the business combination. The personal and financial interests of such individuals may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a target business. However, we believe the ability of such individuals to remain with us after the completion of our business combination will not be the determining factor in our decision as to whether or not we will proceed with any potential business combination. There is no certainty, however, that any members of our management team will remain with us after the completion of our business combination. We cannot assure you that any members of our management team will remain in senior management or advisory positions with us. The determination as to whether any members of our management team will remain with us will be made at the time of our initial business combination.

We may have a limited ability to assess the management of a prospective target business and, as a result, may complete our initial business combination with a target business whose management may not have the skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company, which could, in turn, negatively impact the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.

When evaluating the desirability of effecting our initial business combination with a prospective target business, our ability to assess the target business’s management may be limited due to a lack of time, resources or information. Our assessment of the capabilities of the target’s management, therefore, may prove to be incorrect and such management may lack the skills, qualifications or abilities we suspected. Should the target’s management not possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to manage a public company, the operations and profitability of the post-combination business may be negatively impacted. Accordingly, any stockholders who choose to remain stockholders following the business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their shares. Such stockholders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value.


The officers and directors of an acquisition candidate may resign upon completion of our initial business combination. The departure of a business combination target’s key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business. The role of an acquisition candidate’s key personnel upon the completion of our initial business combination cannot be ascertained at this time. Although we contemplate that certain members of an acquisition candidate’s management team will remain associated with the acquisition candidate following our initial business combination, it is possible that members of the management of an acquisition candidate will not wish to remain in place.

Our officers and directors may allocate their time to other businesses, thereby causing conflicts of interest in their determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs. This conflict of interest could have a negative impact on our ability to complete our initial business combination.

Our officers and directors are not required to, and will not, commit their full time to our affairs, which may result in a conflict of interest in allocating their time between our operations and our search for a business combination and their other businesses. Each of our officers is engaged in several other business endeavors for which he may be entitled to substantial compensation and our officers are not obligated to contribute any specific number of hours per week to our affairs. If our officers’ and directors’ other business affairs require them to devote substantial amounts of time to such affairs in excess of their current commitment levels, it could limit their ability to devote time to our affairs which may have a negative impact on our ability to complete our initial business combination.

Certain of our officers and directors are now, and all of them may in the future become, affiliated with entities engaged in business activities similar to those intended to be conducted by us and, accordingly, may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time and determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.

Until we consummate our initial business combination, we intend to engage in the business of identifying and combining with one or more businesses. Our sponsor and officers and directors are, and may in the future become, affiliated with entities (such as operating companies or investment vehicles) that are engaged in a similar business.

Our officers and directors also may become aware of business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to us and the other entities in the future to which they owe certain fiduciary or contractual duties. Accordingly, they may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. These conflicts may not be resolved in our favor and a potential target business may be presented to another entity before its presentation to us. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we renounce our interest in any corporate opportunity offered to any director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of our company and such opportunity is one we are legally and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for us to pursue.

Our officers, directors, security holders and their respective affiliates may have competitive pecuniary interests that conflict with our interests.

We have not adopted a policy that expressly prohibits our directors, officers, security holders or affiliates from having a direct or indirect pecuniary or financial interest in any investment to be acquired or disposed of by us or in any transaction to which we are a party or have an interest. In fact (subject to certain approvals and consents) we may enter into a business combination with a target business that is affiliated with our sponsor, our directors or officers, although we do not intend to do so. We do not have a policy that expressly prohibits any such persons from engaging for their own account in business activities of the types conducted by us. Accordingly, such persons or entities may have a conflict between their interests and ours.


We may engage in a business combination with one or more target businesses that have relationships with entities that may be affiliated with our sponsor, officers, directors or existing holders which may raise potential conflicts of interest.

In light of the involvement of our sponsor, officers and directors with other entities, we may decide to acquire one or more businesses affiliated with our sponsor, officers or directors. Our sponsor, officers and directors are not currently aware of any specific opportunities for us to complete our business combination with any entities with which they are affiliated, and there have been no preliminary substantive discussions concerning a business combination with any such entity or entities. Although we will not be specifically focusing on, or targeting, any transaction with any affiliated entities, we would pursue such a transaction if we determined that such affiliated entity met our criteria for a business combination and such transaction was approved by a majority of our disinterested directors. Despite our agreement to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that is a member of FINRA, or from an independent accounting firm, regarding the fairness to our company from a financial point of view of a business combination with one or more domestic or international businesses affiliated with our officers, directors or existing holders, potential conflicts of interest still may exist and, as a result, the terms of the business combination may not be as advantageous to our public stockholders as they would be absent any conflicts of interest.

We may not have an audit committee consisting entirely of independent directors for up to a year following our initial public offering. You may not know at this time the identities of all independent directors that may be responsible for evaluating an initial business combination.

NASDAQ listing standards require that a majority of our Board be independent. In conformity with NASDAQ’s “phase-in” rules, within one year of our initial public offering, a majority of our Board will be independent. At the closing of the IPO, we had two independent directors. Thus, upon our initial public offering, and for up to a year afterwards, we will have a majority of independent directors and will have an audit committee consisting of a majority of independent directors.

Since our sponsor will lose its entire investment in us if our business combination is not completed and our officers and directors may have differing personal and financial interests than you, a conflict of interest may arise in determining whether a particular business combination target is appropriate for our initial business combination.

In December 2020, our sponsor acquired 4,312,500 founder shares for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000. Before the initial investment in the company of $25,000 by our sponsor, we had no assets, tangible or intangible. The number of founder shares issued was determined based on the expectation that such founder shares would represent 20% of the outstanding shares after the IPO.

The founder shares will be worthless if we do not complete an initial business combination. In addition, our sponsor and underwriters have committed to purchase 6,675,000 private placement warrants, each one identical to the public warrants, for a purchase price of $6,675,000, or $1.00 per whole warrant, that will also be worthless if we do not complete a business combination. Our sponsor has agreed (A) to vote any shares owned by it in favor of any proposed business combination and (B) not to redeem any founder shares in connection with a stockholder vote to approve a proposed initial business combination. In addition, we may obtain loans from our sponsor, affiliates of our sponsor or an officer or director. The personal and financial interests of our officers and directors may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a target business combination, completing an initial business combination and influencing the operation of the business following the initial business combination.


Since our sponsor paid only approximately $0.006 per share for the founder shares, our officers and directors could potentially make a substantial profit even if we acquire a target business that subsequently declines in value.

In December 2020, our sponsor acquired 4,312,500 founder shares for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000, or approximately $0.006 per share. Our officers and directors have a significant economic interest in our sponsor. As a result, the low acquisition cost of the founder shares creates an economic incentive whereby our officers and directors could potentially make a substantial profit even if we acquire a target business that subsequently declines in value and is unprofitable for public investors.

We may issue notes or other debt securities, or otherwise incur substantial debt, to complete a business combination, which may adversely affect our leverage and financial condition and thus negatively impact the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.

Although we have no commitments as of December 31, 2021 to issue any notes or other debt securities, or to otherwise incur outstanding debt following the IPO, we may choose to incur substantial debt to complete our business combination. We have agreed that we will not incur any indebtedness unless we have obtained from the lender a waiver of any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to the monies held in the trust account. As such, no issuance of debt will affect the per-share amount available for redemption from the trust account. Nevertheless, the incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative effects, including:

default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues after an initial business combination are insufficient to repay our debt obligations;

acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even if we make all principal and interest payments when due if we breach certain covenants that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation of that covenant;

our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt security is payable on demand;

our inability to obtain necessary additional financing if the debt security contains covenants restricting our ability to obtain such financing while the debt security is outstanding;

our inability to pay dividends on our common stock;

using a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our debt, which will reduce the funds available for dividends on our common stock if declared, our ability to pay expenses, make capital expenditures and acquisitions, and fund other general corporate purposes;

limitations on our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business and in the industry in which we operate;

increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation;

limitations on our ability to borrow additional amounts for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, and execution of our strategy; and

other disadvantages compared to our competitors who have less debt.


We may only be able to complete one business combination with the proceeds of the IPO and the sale of the private placement warrants, which will cause us to be solely dependent on a single business which may have a limited number of products or services. This lack of diversification may negatively impact our operations and profitability. The net proceeds from the IPO and the private placement of warrants provide us with $174,225,000 that we may use to complete our initial business combination (after taking into account the $ $6,037,500 for the payment of deferred underwriting commissions).

We may complete our business combination with a single target business or multiple target businesses simultaneously or within a short period of time. However, we may not be able to complete our business combination with more than one target business because of various factors, including the existence of complex accounting issues and the requirement that we prepare and file pro forma financial statements with the SEC that present operating results and the financial condition of several target businesses as if they had been operated on a combined basis. By completing our initial business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments. Further, we would not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several business combinations in different industries or different areas of a single industry. In addition, we intend to focus our search for an initial business combination in a single industry. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be:

solely dependent upon the performance of a single business, property or asset; or

dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services.

This lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate after our business combination.

We may attempt to simultaneously complete business combinations with multiple prospective targets, which may hinder our ability to complete our business combination and give rise to increased costs and risks that could negatively impact our operations and profitability.

If we determine to simultaneously acquire several businesses that are owned by different sellers, we will need for each of such sellers to agree that our purchase of its business is contingent on the simultaneous closings of the other business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us, and delay our ability, to complete our initial business combination. With multiple business combinations, we could also face additional risks, including additional burdens and costs with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due diligence investigations (if there are multiple sellers) and the additional risks associated with the subsequent assimilation of the operations and services or products of the acquired companies in a single operating business. If we are unable to adequately address these risks, it could negatively impact our profitability and results of operations.

We may attempt to complete our initial business combination with a private company about which little information is available, which may result in a business combination with a company that is not as profitable as we suspected, if at all.

In pursuing our acquisition strategy, we may seek to complete our initial business combination with a privately held company. Very little public information generally exists about private companies, and we could be required to make our decision on whether to pursue a potential initial business combination on the basis of limited information, which may result in a business combination with a company that is not as profitable as we suspected, if at all.


Our management may not be able to maintain control of a target business after our initial business combination. We cannot provide assurance that, upon loss of control of a target business, new management will possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to profitably operate such business.

We may structure a business combination so that the post-transaction company in which our public stockholders own shares will own less than 100% of the equity interests or assets of a target business, but we will only complete such business combination if the post-transaction company owns or acquires 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquires an interest in the target sufficient for the post-transaction company not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. We will not consider any transaction that does not meet such criteria. Even if the post-transaction company owns 50% or more of the voting securities of the target, our stockholders before the business combination may collectively own a minority interest in the post-transaction company, depending on valuations ascribed to the target and us in the business combination transaction. For example, we could pursue a transaction in which we issue a substantial number of new shares of Class A common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of a target. In this case, we would acquire a 100% interest in the target. However, as a result of the issuance of a substantial number of new shares of common stock, our stockholders immediately before such transaction could own less than a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock after such transaction. In addition, other minority stockholders may subsequently combine their holdings resulting in a single person or group obtaining a larger share of the company’s stock than we initially acquired. Accordingly, this may make it more likely that our management will not be able to maintain control of the target business. We cannot provide assurance that, upon loss of control of a target business, new management will possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to profitably operate such business.

We do not have a specified maximum redemption threshold. The absence of such a redemption threshold will make it easier for us to consummate a business combination with which a substantial number of our stockholders do not agree.

We may be able to consummate a business combination even though a substantial number of our public stockholders do not agree with the transaction and have redeemed their shares or, if we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, if our sponsor, officers, directors or their affiliates have entered into privately negotiated agreements with public stockholders to acquire public shares. However, in no event will we redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 upon consummation of our initial business combination, and the amount that we redeem may be further limited by the terms and conditions of our initial business combination. In such case, we would not proceed with the redemption of our public shares and the related initial business combination, and instead may search for an alternate business combination.

Unlike many blank check companies, our balance sheet reflects negative stockholders’ equity.

The financial statements in this annual report, after collaboration with our independent registered public accounting firm, reflect that all of the public shares are subject to redemption, even though we are prohibited under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation from redeeming all of the public shares since such redemption would result in our failure to have net tangible assets (as determined in accordance with Rule 3a51-1(g)(1) of the Exchange Act) in excess of $5,000,000. As a result, all of the public shares are classified as temporary equity, presented outside of the stockholders’ deficit section of our balance sheet. This accounting presentation may not be consistent with that of other blank check companies and may make comparison of our financial statements to that of other blank check companies more difficult.

In order to complete our initial business combination, we may seek to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or other governing instruments, including our warrant agreement, in a manner that will make it easier for us to complete our initial business combination but that our stockholders or warrant holders may not support.

In order to complete a business combination, blank check companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and governing instruments, including their warrant agreement. For example, blank check companies have amended the definition of business combination, increased redemption thresholds, changed industry focus and, with respect to their warrants, amended their warrant agreements to require the warrants to be exchanged for cash and/or other securities. We may even seek shareholder approval to extend the 12-month time period during which we may consummate a business combination. We cannot assure you that we will not seek to amend our charter or other governing instruments or change our industry focus in order to complete our initial business combination.


The provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that relate to our pre-business combination activity (and corresponding provisions of the agreement governing the release of funds from our trust account) may be amended with the approval of holders of 65% of our common stock, which is a lower amendment threshold than that of some other blank check companies. It may be easier for us, therefore, to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the trust agreement to facilitate the completion of an initial business combination that some of our stockholders may not support.

Some other blank check companies have a provision in their charter that prohibits the amendment of certain of its provisions, including those which relate to a company’s pre-business combination activity, without approval by a certain percentage of the company’s stockholders. In those companies, amendment of these provisions requires approval by between 90% and 100% of the company’s public stockholders. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that any of its provisions related to pre-business combination activity (including the requirement to deposit proceeds of the IPO and the private placement of warrants into the trust account and not release such amounts except in specified circumstances, and to provide redemption rights to public stockholders as described herein) may be amended if approved by holders of 65% of our common stock entitled to vote thereon, and corresponding provisions of the trust agreement governing the release of funds from our trust account may be amended if approved by holders of 65% of our common stock entitled to vote thereon. In all other instances, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation may be amended by holders of a majority of our outstanding common stock entitled to vote thereon, subject to applicable provisions of the DGCL or applicable stock exchange rules. We may not issue additional securities that can vote on amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or in our initial business combination. Our initial stockholders, will collectively beneficially own 20% of our common stock upon the closing of the IPO (assuming they did not purchase any units in the IPO), will participate in any vote to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and/or trust agreement and will have the discretion to vote in any manner they choose. As a result, we may be able to amend the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that govern our pre-business combination behavior more easily than some other blank check companies, and this may increase our ability to complete a business combination with which you do not agree. Our stockholders may pursue remedies against us for any breach of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

Our sponsor, officers and directors have agreed, pursuant to a letter agreement with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that would affect the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) from the closing of the IPO, unless we provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their shares of Class A common stock upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest (which interest shall be net of amounts released to us to pay taxes and expenses related to the administration of the trust), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares. Our stockholders are not parties to, or third-party beneficiaries of, this letter agreement and, as a result, will not have the ability to pursue remedies against our sponsor, officers or directors for any breach of the letter agreement. As a result, in the event of a breach, our stockholders would need to pursue a stockholder derivative action, subject to applicable law.

We may be unable to obtain additional financing to complete our initial business combination or to fund the operations and growth of a target business, which could compel us to restructure or abandon a particular business combination.

Although we believe that the net proceeds of the IPO and the sale of the private placement warrants will be sufficient to allow us to complete our initial business combination, because we have not yet selected any prospective target business, we cannot ascertain the capital requirements for any particular transaction. If the net proceeds of the IPO and the sale of the private placement warrants prove to be insufficient, either because of the size of our initial business combination, the depletion of the available net proceeds in search of a target business, the obligation to repurchase for cash a significant number of shares from stockholders who elect redemption in connection with our initial business combination or the terms of negotiated transactions to purchase shares in connection with our initial business combination, we may be required to seek additional financing or to abandon the proposed business combination. We cannot assure you that such financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. To the extent that additional financing proves to be unavailable when needed to complete our initial business combination, we would be compelled to either restructure the transaction or abandon that particular business combination and seek an alternative target business candidate. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may receive only approximately $10.10 per share plus any pro rata interest earned on the funds held in the trust account (and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the trust account) on the liquidation of our trust account and our warrants will expire worthless. In addition, even if we do not need additional financing to complete our business combination, we may require such financing to fund the operations or growth of the target business. The failure to secure additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the continued development or growth of the target business. None of our officers, directors or stockholders is required to provide any financing to us in connection with or after our initial business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive approximately $10.10 per share on the liquidation of our trust account, and our warrants will expire worthless. In certain circumstances, our public stockholders may receive less than $10.10 per share on the redemption of their shares. See “-If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders may be less than $10.10 per share” and other risk factors in this section.


Our initial stockholders may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a stockholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support.

Upon the closing of the IPO, our initial stockholders own shares representing 20% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly, they may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a stockholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support, including amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and approval of major corporate transactions. If our initial stockholders purchase any additional shares of common stock in the aftermarket or in privately negotiated transactions, this would increase their control. Factors that would be considered in making such additional purchases would include consideration of the current trading price of our Class A common stock. In addition, our Board, whose members were elected by our initial stockholders, is and will be divided into three classes, each of which will generally serve for a term of three years with only one class of directors being elected in each year. We may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders to elect new directors before the completion of our business combination, in which case all of the current directors will continue in office until at least the completion of the business combination. If there is an annual meeting, as a consequence of our “staggered” Board, only a minority of the Board will be considered for election and our initial stockholders, because of their ownership position, will have considerable influence regarding the outcome. Accordingly, our initial stockholders will continue to exert control at least until the completion of our business combination.

We may amend the terms of the warrants in a manner that may be adverse to holders of public warrants with the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants. As a result, the exercise price of your warrants could be increased, the exercise period could be shortened and the number of shares of our Class A common stock purchasable upon exercise of a warrant could be decreased, all without your approval.

Our warrants will be issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and us. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders of public warrants. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the public warrants in a manner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants approve of such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms of the public warrants with the consent of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the warrants, convert the warrants into cash or stock, shorten the exercise period or decrease the number of shares of our Class A common stock purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.


We may redeem your unexpired warrants before their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to you, thereby making your warrants worthless.

We have the ability to redeem outstanding warrants for cash at any time after they become exercisable and before their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant, provided that the last reported sales price of our Class A common stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which we give proper notice of such redemption and provided certain other conditions are met. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. Redemption of the outstanding warrants could force you (i) to exercise your warrants and pay the exercise price therefore at a time when it may be disadvantageous for you to do so, (ii) to sell your warrants at the then-current market price when you might otherwise wish to hold your warrants or (iii) to accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of your warrants. In addition, we may redeem your warrants after they become exercisable for a number of shares of Class A common stock determined based on the redemption date and the fair market value of our Class A common stock. Any such redemption may have similar consequences to a cash redemption described above. In addition, such redemption may occur at a time when the warrants are “out-of-the-money,” in which case you would lose any potential embedded value from a subsequent increase in the value of the Class A common stock had your warrants remained outstanding.

Our warrants and founder shares may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A common stock and make it more difficult to complete our business combination.

We issued warrants to purchase 12,937,500 shares of Class A common stock, and in a private placement, an aggregate of 6,675,000 warrants, at $1.00 per warrant at the option of the lender. The private placement warrants are identical to the public warrants including as to the exercise price, exercisability and exercise period. In addition, if the sponsor makes any working capital loans, it may convert those loans into up to an additional 1,500,000 private placement warrants, at the price of $1.00 per warrant. We may also issue shares of Class A common stock in connection with our redemption of our warrants.

To the extent we issue shares of Class A common stock to complete a business combination, the potential for the issuance of a substantial number of additional shares of Class A common stock upon exercise of these warrants and conversion rights could make us a less attractive acquisition vehicle to a target business. Any such issuance will increase the number of issued and outstanding shares of our Class A common stock and reduce the value of the shares of Class A common stock issued to complete the business combination. Therefore, our warrants and founder shares may make it more difficult to complete a business combination or increase the cost of acquiring the target business.

Because each unit contains three-quarters of one warrant and only a whole warrant may be exercised, the units may be worth less than units of other special purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs.

Each unit contains three-quarters of one warrant. Because, pursuant to the warrant agreement, the warrants may only be exercised for a whole number of shares, only a whole warrant may be exercised at any given time. This is different from other offerings similar to ours whose units include one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase one whole share. We have established the components of the units in this way in order to reduce the dilutive effect of the warrants upon completion of a business combination since the warrants will be exercisable in the aggregate for three-quarters of the number of shares compared to units that each contain a warrant to purchase one whole share, thus making us, we believe, a more attractive merger partner for target businesses. Nevertheless, this unit structure may cause our units to be worth less than if they included a warrant to purchase one whole share.

A provision of our warrant agreement may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial business combination.

Unlike most blank check companies, if (i) we issue additional shares of common stock or equity-linked securities for capital raising purposes in connection with the closing of our initial business combination at a Newly Issued Price of less than $9.20 per share of common stock and (ii) the aggregate gross proceeds from such issuances represent more than 60% of the total equity proceeds, and interest thereon, available for the funding of our initial business combination on the date of the consummation of our initial business combination (net of redemptions), and (iii) the Market Value is below $9.20 per share, then the exercise price of the warrants will be adjusted to be equal to 115% of the higher of the Market Value and the Newly Issued Price, and the $18.00 per share redemption trigger prices will be adjusted (to the nearest cent) to be equal to 180% of the higher of the Market Value or the Newly Issued Price, respectively. This may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial business combination with a target business.


Risks Relating to our Securities

Because we must furnish our stockholders with target business financial statements, we may lose the ability to complete an otherwise advantageous initial business combination with some prospective target businesses.

The federal proxy rules require that a proxy statement with respect to a vote on a business combination meeting certain financial significance tests include target historical and/or pro forma financial statement disclosure. We will include the same financial statement disclosure in connection with our tender offer documents, whether or not they are required under the tender offer rules. These financial statements may be required to be prepared in accordance with, or be reconciled to, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) or international financial reporting standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”), depending on the circumstances and the historical financial statements may be required to be audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (the “PCAOB”). These financial statement requirements may limit the pool of potential target businesses we may acquire because some targets may be unable to provide such financial statements in time for us to disclose such financial statements in accordance with federal proxy rules and complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame.

Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, lenders, customers and other market participants with respect to our Environmental, Social and Governance, or ESG, policies may impose additional costs on us or expose us to additional risks.

Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny relating to their ESG policies. Investors, lenders and other market participants are increasingly focused on ESG practices and in recent years have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of their investments. The increased focus and activism related to ESG may hinder our access to capital, as investors and lenders may reconsider their capital investment allocation as a result of their assessment of our ESG practices. If we do not adapt to or comply with investor, lender or other industry shareholder expectations and standards, which are evolving, or which are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, may suffer from reputational damage and the future business, financial condition and stock price could be materially and adversely affected.

We are an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosurevarious reporting requirements availableapplicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.

We arequalify as an “emerging growth company” within the meaningas defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, andAct. As such, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including but not limited to, not being required to comply with(a) the exemption from the auditor attestation requirements ofwith respect to internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (b) the exemptions from say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and say-on-golden parachute voting requirements and (c) reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.registration statements. As a result, our stockholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We could bewill remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (a) the last day of the fiscal year (i) following August 17, 2026, the fifth anniversary of our IPO, (ii) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion (as adjusted for upinflation pursuant to five years, although circumstances could cause usSEC rules from time to lose that status earlier, including iftime) or (iii) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our Class A common stockCommon Stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30 beforethe last business day of our prior second fiscal quarter, and (b) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three year period.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that time, in which case we would no longer be an emerging growth company ascan take advantage of the following December 31. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.


Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companiesexemption from being required to complycomplying with new or revised financialaccounting standards provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act as long as we are an emerging growth company. An emerging growth company can therefore delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards.companies. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies, but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected to irrevocably opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we will adopt the new or revised standard at the time public companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with another emerging growth company that has not opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accountantaccounting standards used.

Additionally,We cannot predict if investors will find our Class A Common Stock less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Class A Common Stock less attractive as a result, there may be less active trading market for our Class A Common Stock and our stock price may be more volatile. 

We are a “smallersmaller reporting company”company, and we cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are a smaller reporting company under Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smallerlong as we continue to be a smaller reporting companiescompany, we may take advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements. We will remain a smallerexemptions from various reporting company until the last day of any fiscal year for so long as either (1) the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates did not exceed $250 million as of the prior June 30, or (2) our annual revenues did not exceed $100 million during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates did not exceed $700 million as of the prior June 30.

Compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may make it more difficult for us to complete our initial business combination, require substantial financial and management resources, and increase the time and costs of completing an acquisition.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requiresrequirements that we evaluate and report on our system of internal controls beginning with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2021. Only if we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer or an accelerated filer will we be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement on our internal control over financial reporting. Further, for as long as we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement on our internal control over financial reporting. The fact that we are a blank check company makes compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act particularly burdensome on us as comparedapplicable to other public companies because a target company with which we seek to complete our business combination maythat are not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actsmaller reporting companies, including reduced disclosure obligations regarding adequacy of its internal controls. The development of the internal control of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete any such acquisition.

Provisionsexecutive compensation in our amendedperiodic reports and restated certificate of incorporation and Delaware lawproxy statements. We cannot predict if investors will find our Class A Common Stock less attractive because we may inhibitrely on smaller reporting company exemptions. If some investors find our Class A Common Stock less attractive as a takeover of us, which could limit the price investors mightresult, there may be willing to pay in the futurea less active trading market for our Class A Common Stock, and our stock price may be more volatile.

We may issue additional common stock or preferred stock under an employee incentive plan. Any such issuances would dilute the interest of our stockholders and could entrench management.likely present other risks.

Our amended and restated certificateWe may issue a substantial number of incorporation will contain provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that stockholders may consider to be in their best interests. These provisions include a staggered Board and the abilityadditional shares of the Board to designate the termscommon or preferred stock under an employee incentive plan. The issuance of and issue new seriesadditional shares of common or preferred shares, which may make the removal of management more difficult and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.stock:

may significantly dilute the equity interests of our investors;

may subordinate the rights of holders of common stock if preferred stock is issued with rights senior to those afforded our common stock;


 

could cause a change in control if a substantial number of shares of our common stock are issued, which may affect, among other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation or removal of our present officers and directors; and

may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our Class A Common Stock and/or warrants.

We are also subject to anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law, which could delay or prevent a change of control. Together these provisions may make the removal of management more difficult and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation designate the Court of Chancery ofThe Charter designates state courts within the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees or agents.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporationThe Charter provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, (a) the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (“Court of Chancery”) will,shall, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf of us, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by, or other wrongdoing by, any current or former director, officer, employee or agent of our directors, officers, employees or stockholdersours to us or our stockholders, or a claim of aiding and abetting any such breach of fiduciary duty, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us or any director, officer, employee or agent of ours arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, ourDelaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), the Charter or the Bylaws (as either may be amended, and restated, certificatemodified, supplemented or waived from time to time), (iv) any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of incorporationthe Charter or bylawsthe Bylaws (as either may be amended, restated, modified, supplemented or aswaived from time to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery or (iv)time), (v) any action asserting a claim against us our directors, officers, or employeesany director, officer, employee or agent of ours that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine or (vi) any action asserting an “internal corporate claim” as that term is defined in each such case except for such claims as to which (a)Section 115 of the Court of Chancery determinesDGCL.

In addition, the Charter provides that, it does not have personal jurisdiction over an indispensable party, (b) exclusive jurisdiction is vestedunless we consent in a court or forum other than the Court of Chancery, or (c) the Court of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in shares of our common stock will be deemed to have notice of, and consentedwriting to the provisionsselection of our amendedan alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and restated certificateexclusive forum for the resolution of incorporation described inany complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the preceding sentence. Securities Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Charter provides that the exclusive forum provision will not apply to claims seeking to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the U.S. federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction.

This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees or agents,stockholders, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such lawsuits against usclaims, although our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with federal securities laws and such persons.the rules and regulations thereunder. Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisionsthe choice of forum provision contained in our certificate of incorporationamended and restated bylaws to be inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings,an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such mattersaction in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affectharm our business, financial condition oroperating results of operations.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the exclusive forum provision will be applicable to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder and Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. As a result, the exclusive forum provision will not apply to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act, the Securities Act, or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction.


Cyber incidents or attacks directed at us could result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/or financial loss.

We depend on digital technologies, including information systems, infrastructure and cloud applications and services, including those of third parties with which we may deal. Sophisticated and deliberate attacks on, or security breaches in, our systems or infrastructure, or the systems or infrastructure of third parties or the cloud, could lead to corruption or misappropriation of our assets, proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data. As an early stage company without significant investments in data security protection, we may not be sufficiently protected against such occurrences. We may not have sufficient resources to adequately protect against, or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to, cyber incidents. It is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of them, could have adverse consequences on our business and lead to financial loss.

An investment in CENAQ Common Stock may result in uncertain or adverse United States federal income tax consequences.

An investment in CENAQ stock may result in uncertain U.S. federal income tax consequences. For instance, because there are no authorities that directly address instruments similar to the units we are issuing in the IPO, the allocation an investor makes with respect to the purchase price of a unit between the share of Class A common stock and the three-quarters of one redeemable warrant to purchase Class A common stock included in each unit could be challenged by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or the courts. Furthermore, the U.S. federal income tax consequences of a cashless exercise of a warrant included in the units is unclear under current law. Finally, it is unclear whether the redemption rights with respect to our shares of Class A common stock suspend the running of a U.S. holder’s holding period for purposes of determining whether any gain or loss realized by such holder on the sale or exchange of Class A common stock is long-term capital gain or loss and for determining whether any dividend we pay would be considered “qualified dividend income” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See “United States Federal Income Tax Considerations” below for a summary of the principal United States federal income tax consequences of an investment in our securities. Prospective investors are urged to consult their tax advisors with respect to these and other tax consequences when purchasing, holding or disposing of our securities.

If we complete our initial business combination with a company with operations or opportunities outside of the United States, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may negatively impact our operations.

If we complete our initial business combination with a company with operations or opportunities outside of the United States, we would be subject to any special considerations or risks associated with companies operating in an international setting, including any of the following:

higher costs and difficulties inherent in managing cross-border business operations and complying with different commercial and legal requirements of overseas markets;

rules and regulations regarding currency redemption;

complex corporate withholding taxes on individuals;

laws governing the manner in which future business combinations may be effected;

tariffs and trade barriers;

regulations related to customs and import/export matters;

longer payment cycles and challenges in collecting accounts receivable;

tax issues, such as tax law changes and variations in tax laws as compared to the United States;

currency fluctuations and exchange controls;

rates of inflation;

cultural and language differences;


employment regulations;

crime, strikes, riots, civil disturbances, terrorist attacks, natural disasters and wars;

deterioration of political relations with the United States; and

government appropriations of assets.

We may not be able to adequately address these additional risks. If we were unable to do so, our operations might suffer, which may adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.None.

ITEM 1C. Cybersecurity.

Risk management and strategy

We have established processes for assessing, identifying, and managing material risk from cybersecurity threats, and have integrated these processes into our overall risk management systems and processes. We routinely assess material risks from cybersecurity threats, including any potential unauthorized attempts to access our information systems that may result in adverse effects on the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of those systems.

These risk assessments include identification of reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks, the likelihood and potential damage that could result from such risks, and the sufficiency of existing policies, procedures, systems, and safeguards in place to manage such risks. Following these risk assessments, if necessary, we would re-design and implement reasonable additional safeguards to minimize identified risks and address any identified gaps in existing safeguards.

Primary responsibility for assessing, monitoring, and managing our cybersecurity risks rests with our third-party IT service provider who reports to our Chief Technology Officer, to manage the risk assessment and mitigation process.


As part of our overall risk management system, we monitor and test our safeguards and we train our relevant employees on these safeguards, in collaboration with our third-party IT provider and management. Since users are typically the weakest link in any information system, we periodically train all our employees on good cybersecurity practices, including password management, phishing prevention, and other security awareness issues.

We have not encountered cybersecurity threats or challenges that have materially impaired our operations, business strategy or financial condition.

Governance

Our Board of Directors is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure including cybersecurity risk, and our executive officers are responsible for the day-to-day management of the material risks we face. Our Board of Directors administers its cybersecurity risk oversight function directly as a whole, as well as through the Audit Committee.

Our Chief Technology Officer is primarily responsible for assessing and managing our material risks from cybersecurity threats with assistance from our third-party IT service provider.

Our Chief Technology Officer oversees our cybersecurity policies and processes and will provide periodic briefings to the Chief Executive Officer, the Audit Committee and/or the Board of Directors as needed regarding any material cybersecurity risks or activities, including any recent cybersecurity incidents and related responses.

ITEM 2. Properties.

Our executive offices are shared with other companiescorporate headquarters is located at 4550 Post Oak Place Dr.,711 Louisiana St, Suite 300,2160, Houston, Texas 77027,77002. The office lease for our corporate headquarters expires in February 2027. We also lease commercial office space and a demonstration facility in Hillsborough, New Jersey pursuant to an operating lease that expires in April 2025.

Leasing our telephone number is (713) 820-6300.facilities gives us the flexibility to expand or reduce our office space as appropriate as we shift from product development to deployment. We considerbelieve our current office spacefacilities are adequate for our current operations. No rent is currently being paid or accrued.operating needs, and we anticipate that we will have access to other facilities, through future contractual arrangements, for development, testing and production.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we may become involved in legalWe do not consider any claims, lawsuits or proceedings relating to claims arising from the ordinary course of business. Our management believes that there are currently no claims or actions pending against us, individually or in the ultimate disposition of which could haveaggregate, to be material to our business or likely to result in a material adverse effect on our future operating results, of operations, financial condition or cash flows. However, from time to time, we may be subject to various claims, lawsuits and other legal and administrative proceedings that may arise in the ordinary course of business. Some of these claims, lawsuits and other proceedings may involve highly complex issues that are subject to substantial uncertainties, and could result in damages, fines, penalties, non-monetary sanctions or relief. We recognize provisions for claims or pending litigation when we determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Due to the inherent uncertain nature of litigation, the ultimate outcome or actual cost of settlement may materially vary from estimates.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.


 

PART II

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our units, public sharesVerde Clean Fuels’ Class A Common Stock and public warrants are each tradedPublic Warrants currently trade on the NASDAQ Stock MarketNasdaq under the trading symbols “CENQU,of “VGAS” and “VGASW,“CENQ”respectively, and “CENQW,” respectively. Our units commenced public trading on August 13, 2021,March 28, 2024, the Company had 9,428,797 shares of Class A Common Stock issued and our publicoutstanding, 22,500,000 shares of Class C Common Stock issued and public warrants commenced separate public trading on October 4, 2021. Our Class B common stock is not listed on any exchange.outstanding and 15,383,263 Warrants issued and outstanding.

Holders

On March 18, 2022,28, 2024, there was one holder of record of our units, threewere 33 holders of record of our Class A common stock, nineteenCommon Stock, one holder of record of our Class C Common Stock and 16 holders of record of our Class B common stock and four holders of record of our warrants.

The number of holders of record does not include We believe a substantially greater number of “street name’ holders or beneficial holders whose units,owners hold shares of Class A common stockCommon Stock and public warrants are held of record byPublic Warrants through brokers, banks brokers andor other financial institutions.nominees.

Dividends

We have notThe Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock to date and dodoes not intendpresently plan to pay cash dividends prior toin the completion of our initial business combination.foreseeable future. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial condition subsequent to completion of our initial business combination.condition. The payment of any cash dividends subsequent to our initial business combination will be within the discretion of ourthe Company’s board of directors at such time. In addition, ourthe Company’s board of directors is not currently contemplating and does not anticipate declaring any stock dividends in the foreseeable future. Further, if we incur any indebtedness in connection with our initial business combination, our ability to declare dividends may be limited by restrictive covenants we may agree to in connection therewith.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

None.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.None other than as previously reported.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

Use of Proceeds from the Initial Public Offering

On August 17, 2021, we consummated our initial public offering of 15,000,000 Units. Each Unit consists of one share of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and three-quarters of one redeemable warrant, each whole warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one whole share ofWe did not repurchase any Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share. The Units were sold at a price of $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds of $150,000,000.or Public Warrants during the three months ended December 31, 2023.

The securities sold in the offering were registered under the Securities Act on a registration statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-253695). The SEC declared the registration statement effective on August 12, 2021.

On August 17, 2021, simultaneously with the consummation of the IPO, we completed the private sale of 6,000,000 warrants at a purchase price of $1.00 per Private Placement Warrant, to our sponsor, CENAQ Sponsor, LLC, and the Underwriters, generating gross proceeds to the Company of $6,000,000.

A total of $ 174,225,000 of the proceeds from the IPO and the Private Placement have been placed in a U.S.-based trust account at Bank of America maintained by Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, acting as trustee.

On August 19, 2021, we consummated the sale of additional 2,250,000 Units that were subject to the underwriters’ over-allotment option at $10.00 per Unit, generating gross proceeds of $22,500,000. Simultaneously with the closing of the sale of additional units, we consummated the sale of an additional 675,000 private Warrants, generating total proceeds of $675,000. Following the closing of the over-allotment option and sale of additional private Warrants, an aggregate amount of $174,225,000 has been placed in the trust account established in connection with the IPO.


The net proceeds of the Initial Public Offering (including the Over-Allotment) and certain proceeds from the sale of the Private Placement Warrants may be invested in U.S. government treasury bills with a maturity of 185 days or less and in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations.

The proceeds are after deducting $3,450,000 in underwriting discounts and commissions and an aggregate amount of $1,500,000 to pay fees and expenses in connection with the closing of the IPO and for working capital following the closing of the IPO.

There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our offering as described in our final prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) related to the Initial Public Offering.

ITEM 6. [Reserved].

ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion andAnd Analysis ofOf Financial Condition andAnd Results of OperationsOf Operations.

The following discussion and analysis provides information which we believe is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunctiontogether with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report, on Form 10-K. Thisas well as with “Item 1. Business – Formation, Business Combination and Related Transactions.” In addition to historical financial information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements reflecting ourbased upon current expectations estimatesthat involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions concerning eventsassumptions. See the sections entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and financial trends that may affect our future operating results or financial position.Item 1A. “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Report. Actual results and the timing of selected events may differ materially from those containedanticipated in these forward-looking statements due toas a numberresult of various factors, including those discussed in the sections entitledset forth under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Factors.”

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. Factors that might cause or contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, those described in our other Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings.

Overview

We are a newly organized blank check company incorporated as a Delaware corporation on June 24, 2020, for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses.

Our sponsor is CENAQ Sponsor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. The registration statement for the initial public offering was declared effective on August 12, 2021. On August 17, 2021, we consummated our initial public offering of 15,000,000 units, at $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds of $150,000,000. The underwriter was granted a 45-day option from the date of the final prospectus relating to the initial public offering to purchase up to 2,250,000 additional units to cover over-allotments, if any, at $10.00 per unit. On August 19, 2021, the underwriters exercised the overallotment in full, generating additional gross proceeds of $22,500,000. Transaction costs of our initial public offering and the over-allotment amounted to $17,771,253 consisting of $3,450,000 of underwriting discount, $6,037,500 of deferred underwriting discount, an excess of fair value of the founder shares acquired by the Anchor Investors of $6,265,215, fair value of the 189,750 representative shares of $1,442,100 and $576,438 of other cash offering costs were charged to additional paid in capital.


 

SimultaneouslyOverview

We are a clean energy technology company specializing in the conversion of synthesis gas, or syngas, derived from diverse feedstocks, such as biomass or natural gas and other feedstocks, into liquid hydrocarbons that can be used as gasoline through an innovative and proprietary liquid fuels technology, the STG+® process. Through our STG+® process, we convert syngas into RBOB gasoline. We are focused on the development of technology and commercial facilities aimed at turning waste and other bio-feedstocks into a usable stream of syngas which is then transformed into a single finished fuel, such as gasoline, without any additional refining steps. The availability of biogenic MSW and the economic and environmental drivers that divert these materials from landfills will enable us to utilize these waste streams to produce renewable gasoline from modular production facilities with expected capacity to produce between approximately seven million to 30 million gallons of renewable gasoline per year.

We are redefining liquid fuels technology through our proprietary and innovative STG+® process to deliver scalable and cost-effective renewable gasoline. We acquired our STG+® technology from Primus, who developed the closingpatented STG+® technology to convert syngas into gasoline or methanol. Since acquiring the technology, we have adapted the application of our STG+® technology to focus on the renewable energy industry. This adaptation requires a third-party gasification system to produce acceptable synthesis gas from renewable feedstocks. Our proprietary STG+® system converts the syngas into gasoline.

Key Factors and Trends Influencing our Prospects and Future Results

We believe that our performance and future success depend on a number of factors that present significant opportunities for us but also pose risks and challenges, including competition from other carbon-based and other non-carbon-based fuel producers, changes to existing federal and state level low-carbon fuel credit systems, and other factors discussed under the section titled “Risk Factors.” We believe the factors described below are key to our success.

Successful Implementation of the initial public offering, we consummatedfirst commercial facility

A critical step in our success will be the private placement (“Private Placement”)successful construction and operation of 6,000,000 warrants,the first commercial production facility using our patented STG+® technology. We believe our commercialization activities are being completed at a pricepace that can support first commercial production of $1.00 per warrant, generating gross proceeds to us of $6 million. On August 19, 2021, the underwriters exercised the over-allotment in full and consummated the private placement of additional 675,000 warrants, at a price of $1.00 per warrant, generating gross proceeds to us of $675,000.gasoline as early as 2026.

UponProtection and Continuous Development of Our Patented Technology

Our ability to compete successfully will depend on our ability to protect, commercialize, and further develop our proprietary process technology and commercial facilities in a timely manner, and in a manner technologically superior to and/or are less expensive than competing processes.

Key Components of Results of Operations

We are an early-stage company and our historical results may not be indicative of our future results. Accordingly, the closingdrivers of our future financial results, as well as the initial public offering and the Private Placement, $174,225,000 ($10.10 per share)components of the net proceedssuch results, may not be comparable to our historical or future results of operations.

Revenue

We have not generated any revenue to date. We expect to generate a significant portion of our future revenue from the sale of the Units in the initial public offering and the Private Placement were placed in the Trust Account.renewable RBOB grade gasoline or gasoline derived from natural gas.

If we are unable to complete an initial Business Combination within the Combination Period, we will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay its franchise and income taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the Trust Account (less up to $100,000 of interest released to us to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our board of directors, liquidate and dissolve, subject, in each case, to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law.

Results of Operations

As of December 31, 2021, we have not commenced any operations. All activity for the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2021 relates to our formation and initial public offering (“Public Offering” or “IPO”), and, since the completion of the IPO, searching for a target to consummate a Business Combination. We will not generate any operating revenues until after the completion of a Business Combination, at the earliest. We will generate non-operating income in the form of interest income from the proceeds derived from the Public Offering and placed in the Trust Account (defined below).

For the year ended December 31, 2021, we had a net loss of $474,585. We incurred $456,765 of formation and operating costs (not charged against stockholders’ equity), consisting mostly of general and administrative expenses. We earned interest income of $4,680 and recorded unrealized loss on fair value changes of over-allotment option liability of $22,500.

Liquidity and Going Concern

As of December 31, 2021, the Company had $505,518 in its operating bank account, and working capital of $487,083.

The Company’s liquidity needs up to December 31, 2021 had been satisfied through a payment from the Sponsor of $25,000 for the Founder Shares (see Note 5) and no borrowings under the promissory note. Upon close of the IPO, there was no amount outstanding on the promissory note.

In order to finance transaction costs in connection with a Business Combination, the Company’s Sponsor or an affiliate of the Sponsor or certain of the Company’s officers and directors committed to provide the Company with Working Capital Loans up to $1,500,000, as defined later (see Note 5). This commitment extends through August 17, 2022. To date, there were no amounts outstanding under any Working Capital Loans.


 

IfExpenses

General and Administrative Expense

G&A expenses consist of compensation costs including salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense for personnel in executive, finance, accounting, and other administrative functions. General and administrative expenses also include legal fees, professional fees paid for accounting, auditing and consulting services, and insurance costs. Following the Company’s estimateBusiness Combination, we incurred higher general and administrative expenses for public registrant costs for compliance with the regulations of the SEC and the Nasdaq Capital Market.

Research and Development Expense

Our R&D expenses consist primarily of internal and external expenses incurred in connection with our R&D activities. These expenses include labor directly performed on our projects and fees paid to third parties working on and testing specific aspects of our STG+ design and gasoline product output. R&D costs of identifying a target business, undertaking in-depth due diligencehave been expensed as incurred. We expect R&D expenses to grow as we continue to develop the STG+ technology and negotiating a Business Combination are less than the actual amount necessary to do so, the Company may have insufficient funds available to operate its business priordevelop market and strategic relationships with other businesses.

Contingent consideration

Prior to the Business Combination. Moreover,Combination, the Company may needhad an arrangement payable to obtain additional financing eitherthe Company’s CEO and a consultant whereby a contingent payment would become payable if certain return on investment hurdles are met within five years of an asset purchase arrangement. The contingent consideration was forfeited when the Company closed on the Business Combination.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022

  For the
Year Ended
  For the
Year Ended
 
  December 31,
2023
  December 31,
2022
 
General and administrative expenses $11,515,192  $4,514,994 
Contingent consideration  (1,299,000)  (7,551,000)
Research and development expenses  329,194   316,712 
Total Operating loss (income)  10,545,386   (2,719,294)
         
Other (income)  (447,074)  - 
Interest expense  236,699   - 
Loss (income) before income taxes  10,335,011   (2,719,294)
Provision for income taxes  166,265   - 
Net loss (income) $10,501,276  $(2,719,294)

Comparison for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses increased approximately $7.0 million, or 155%, from $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 to complete its$11.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily due to higher professional fees of $3.0 million primarily due to the Business Combination, or because it becomes obligatedhigher share-based compensation expense of $1.5 million due to redeemthe acceleration of vesting of equity awards as a significant numberresult of its public shares uponthe consummation of the Business Combination, in which case the Company may issue additional securities or incur debt in connection with such Business Combination. Subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, the Company would only complete such financing simultaneously with the completionhigher insurance expense of the Business Combination. If the Company is unable to complete its Business Combination because it does not have sufficient funds available to it, the Company will be forced to cease operations$1.4 million, and liquidate the Trust Account. In addition, following the Business Combination, if cash on hand is insufficient, the Company may need to obtain additional financing in order to meet its obligations.higher employee compensation and benefit costs of $0.4 million. Rent and depreciation expense and other general and administrative expenses also increased by $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

We cannot assure you that our plans to raise capital or to consummate an initial business combination will be successful. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, which could impact our business plan. The financial statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report do not include any adjustments that might result from our inability to continue as a going concern.

The holders of the Founder Shares, Private Placement Warrants and warrants that may be issued upon conversion of Working Capital Loans (and any shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Private Placement Warrants and warrants that may be issued upon conversion of Working Capital Loans and upon conversion of the Founder Shares) will be entitled to registration rights pursuant to a registration rights agreement signed upon the closing of the IPO, requiring us to register such securities for resale (in the case of the Founder Shares, only after conversion to our Class A common stock). The holders of the majority of these securities are entitled to make up to three demands, excluding short form demands, that we register such securities. In addition, the holders have certain “piggy-back” registration rights with respect to registration statements filed subsequent to the completion of the initial Business Combination and rights to require us to register for resale such securities pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act. However, the registration rights agreement provides that we will not permit any registration statement filed under the Securities Act to become effective until termination of the applicable lock-up period, which occurs (i) in the case of the Founder Shares, on the earlier of (A) six months after the completion of the initial Business Combination or (B) subsequent to the initial Business Combination, (x) if the last sale price of our Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 75 days after the initial Business Combination, or (y) the date on which we complete a liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange, reorganization or other similar transaction that results in all of our stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property and (ii) in the case of the Private Placement Warrants and the respective Class A common stock underlying such warrants, 30 days after the completion of the initial Business Combination. We will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.

We granted the underwriters a 45-day option from the date of this initial public offering to purchase up to an additional 2,250,000 units to cover over-allotments, if any. On August 19, 2021, the over-allotments were exercised in full.

Simultaneously with the closing of the initial public offering and the over-allotment, the underwriters were paid an underwriting discount of 2% of the gross proceeds of the initial public offering and the over-allotment, or $3,450,000. Additionally, the underwriters will be entitled to a deferred underwriting discount of 3.5% of the gross proceeds of the initial public offering and the over-allotment upon the completion of our initial Business Combination.


 

Contractual ObligationsContingent Consideration

The $1.3 million reduction to operating expenses associated with contingent consideration for the year ended December 31, 2023 reflects the reversal of the remaining accrual made by Holdings for certain contingent payments due to the contractual forfeiture of the payments following the close of the Business Combination on February 15, 2023. The reduction to operating expenses associated with contingent consideration of $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 was primarily due to a reduction in the probability of payment following an amendment to the terms and conditions of this arrangement during the third quarter of 2022, and due to the increased likelihood of closing the Business Combination with the SPAC, at which time the contingent payment would be forfeited. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Research and Development

R&D expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 was consistent with the prior year.

Other Income

Other income of $447 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2023 was primarily attributable to interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $237 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2023, which was primarily attributable to our land lease in Maricopa, Arizona, which was classified as a finance lease until the third quarter of 2023. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Provision for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes of $166 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2023 was attributable to changes in estimates related to CENAQ’S 2022 tax obligation. There was no income tax provision recorded for the year ended December 31, 2022, as Intermediate was a limited liability company treated as a partnership for tax purposes, with each of its members accounting for its share of tax attributes and liabilities. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We measure liquidity in terms of our ability to fund the cash requirements of our R&D activities and our near-term business operations, including our contractual obligations and other commitments. Our current liquidity needs primarily involve general and administrative and R&D activities for the ongoing commercialization of our first production facility and associated plant design.

To date, we have not generated any revenue, and as of December 31, 2023, we had cash and cash equivalents of $28.8 million. We do not expect to generate any meaningful revenue unless and until we are able to commercialize our first production facility. Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses, have an accumulated deficit of $23.9 million as of December 31, 2023 and negative operating cash flow in both the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022. Management expects that operating losses and negative cash flows may increase because of additional costs and expenses related to the development of technology and the development of market and strategic relationships with other companies. Our continued solvency is dependent upon our ability to obtain additional working capital to complete our product development and to successfully achieve commerciality of our projects.


In connection with entering into the JDA with Cottonmouth Ventures, a subsidiary of Diamondback, we will begin to incur development costs with respect to the project, prior to reaching a FID and entering into final definitive agreements, irrespective of whether these events occur. We are currently evaluating the impact that the JDA will have on our consolidated financial statements and liquidity. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Following the Business Combination and the closing of the PIPE Financing, we received approximately $37.3 million in cash, net of approximately $10.0 million of transaction expenses and the repayment of approximately $3.75 million of capital contributions made by Holdings since December 2021. We expect to use such proceeds to fund our ongoing operations and R&D activities. The gross amount, before expenses, was composed of approximately $19.0 million released from CENAQ’s trust account, after payment of approximately $158.8 million to public stockholders who exercised Redemption Rights (representing a redemption rate of approximately 89.3%), and $32.0 million of proceeds raised from the PIPE Financing. We also received $91 thousand from the CENAQ operating account. We believe that based on our current level of operating expenses and currently available cash on hand, we will have sufficient funds available to cover R&D activities and operating cash needs for at least the next 12 months. However, as we have not yet developed a commercial production facility and have no meaningful revenue to date, we may require additional funds in future years. Our ability to raise funds through equity offerings may be limited by the significant number of shares that may be publicly sold. As the exercise price of our Public Warrants is $11.50 per share of Class A Common Stock, we do not expect that Public Warrants will be exercised in the foreseeable future. Our ability to fund R&D activities and our operating cash needs for several years does not depend on the proceeds we may receive as the result of exercises of outstanding Warrants.

As our transaction with CENAQ only resulted in $37.3 million of net proceeds, we expect that we will only be able to construct one of our first four originally planned production facilities with these proceeds. The $37.3 million of net proceeds raised at closing of the transaction with CENAQ will contribute to the equity capital portion of our capital expenditure requirements through 2025. We also expect to earn interest income on the net proceeds raised at closing during the ongoing development and construction of our facilities through 2025, and that such interest income will be utilized towards capital expenditures or for general and administrative expenses. We also expect 70% of our total project capital requirements will be met with project financing, industrial revenue bonds, or pollution control bonds, or some combination of debt financing. While we have been in discussions with banks and other credit counterparties regarding project financing, industrial revenue bonds, or pollution control bonds, and these discussions have led to indications of debt financing equivalent to 70% of our capital expenditure requirements, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such financing. The inability to obtain debt financing will adversely impact our ability to implement our business plan.

In connection with the Closing, Sponsor was due $409,612 under existing promissory notes with CENAQ. On February 15, 2023, in lieu of repayment of the existing promissory notes with Sponsor, the Company entered into the New Promissory Note with the Sponsor totaling $409,612. The New Promissory Note canceled and superseded the existing promissory notes. The New Promissory note was non-interest bearing and the entire principal balance of the New Promissory Note was payable on or before February 15, 2024 in cash or shares at our election. On February 15, 2024, we settled the New Promissory Note through the issuance of 40,961 shares of Class A Common Stock at a conversion price of $10.00 per share and recorded an increase to additional paid-in capital of $409,608.

Comparison of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022

The following table sets forth the primary sources and uses of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash for the periods presented below:

  For the Year Ended
December 31,
 
  2023  2022 
Net cash used in operating activities $(9,112,666) $(3,279,147)
Net cash used in investing activities  (58,588)  (4,411)
Net cash provided by financing activities  37,495,502   3,659,395 
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $28,324,248  $375,837 


Cash Flows Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities increased $5.8 million to $9.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared with net cash used in operating activities of $3.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase primarily was due to a higher net loss of $13.2 million and higher payments for prepaid expenses of $0.3 million and income taxes of $0.3 million. These increases were partially offset by a lower non-cash impact for the change in the liability for contingent consideration of $6.3 million and stock-based compensation expense of $1.5 million, and other operating cash flows of $0.2 million.

Cash Flows Used In Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 was consistent with the prior year.

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities increased approximately $33.8 million to $37.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared with net cash provided of $3.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily due to the closing of the Business Combination on February 15, 2023, which raised $37.3 million in cash proceeds, partially offset by cash used for the payment of notes payable, the principal portion of finance lease liabilities, and deferred financing costs.

Commitments and Contractual Obligations

In October 2022, we entered into a 25-year land lease in Maricopa, Arizona with the intent of building a biofuel processing facility. The commencement date of the lease occurred in February 2023 contemporaneous with us obtaining control of the identified asset. The lease was modified during the third quarter of 2023, resulting in a reclassification of the lease from finance to operating. We exited the lease as of December 31, 2023. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2021,2023 and during the year ended December 31, 2023, we didhad not haveengaged in any long-term debt, capital or operating lease obligations.off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP as determined by the FASB. The preparation of consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and incomethe reported amounts of expenses and expensesallocated charges during the periods reported. Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment. Itreporting period. The following is possible that the estimates management considered could possibly change due to one or more future events. The most significanta summary of certain critical accounting policies and estimates that affectedare impacted by judgments and uncertainties and under which different amounts might be reported using different assumptions or estimation methodologies.

Contingent Consideration

Prior to the financial statements as of December 31, 2021Business Combination, our parent entity (Holdings), on Intermediate’s behalf, had an arrangement payable to our Chief Executive Officer and a consultant whereby a contingent payment could become payable in the event that certain return on investment hurdles are the calculationsmet within five years of the fair valuesclosing date of the over-allotment option,Primus asset purchase. We recognized the liability for such contingent payment on our balance sheet and remeasured the estimated payments under this arrangement and recorded our best estimate of amounts payable under such arrangement.

Our contingent consideration liability was measured at fair values of the representative sharesvalue and the fair values of the anchor shares. These estimates are uncertain due to the assumptions usedbased on significant inputs not observable in the stock valuations. These estimates and assumptions have not changed significantly during the year. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. We have identified the following asmarket. As such, our critical accounting policies:

Offering Costs associated with the Initial Public Offering

Offering costs consist of underwriting, legal, accounting and other expenses incurred through the balance sheet date that are directly related to the IPO. We comply with the requirements of the ASC 340-10-S99-1 and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 5A “Expenses of Offering”. Offering costs are allocated to the separable financial instruments, if any, issued in the IPO based on a relative fair value basis compared to total proceeds received.

Class A Common Stock Subject to Possible Redemption

We account for the Class A common stock subject to possible redemption in accordance with the guidance in ASC Topic 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.” Common stock subject to mandatory redemption (if any) arecontingent consideration liability was classified as a liability instrument and measured atLevel 3 fair value. Conditionally redeemable common stock (including common stock that feature redemption rights that are eithervalue measurement within the controlfair value hierarchy. The valuation of contingent consideration used assumptions we believe would be made by a market participant. We assessed these estimates on an ongoing basis as additional data impacting the holder or subjectassumptions was obtained. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration related to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solelyupdated assumptions and estimates were recognized within the Company’s control) are classified as temporary equity. At all other times, common stock is classified as stockholders’ equity.consolidated statements of operations.

We recognize changes in redemptionIn evaluating the fair value immediately as they occur. Immediately uponinformation, considerable judgment was required to interpret the closing ofmarket data used to develop the IPO, we recognized the subsequent re-measurement under ASC 480-10-S99 from initial carrying amount to redemption value. The change in the carrying value of redeemable common stock resulted in charges against additional paid-in capital and accumulated deficit.estimates.

Net Loss Per Common stock

We have two classes of common stock, which are referred to as Class A common stock and Class B common stock. Income and losses are allocated on pro rata basis between redeemable and non-redeemable common stock. The 19,612,500 potential common shares for outstanding warrants to purchase our stock were excluded from diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2021 because the warrants are contingently exercisable, and the contingencies have not yet been met. As a result, diluted net loss per common share is the same as basic net loss per common share for the periods.

Recent Accounting Standards

In August 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2020-06, Debt —debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging —Contracts in Entity’ Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’ Own Equity (“ASU 2020-06”), which simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. The ASU also removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity-linked contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception, and it simplifies the diluted earnings per share calculation in certain areas. We are currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-04, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt—Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This guidance clarifies certain aspects of the current guidance to promote consistency among reporting of an issuer’s accounting for modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options (for example, warrants) that remain equity classified after modification or exchange. The amendments in this update are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. We are currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Our management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statement.


 

JOBS ActThe fair value of the contingent consideration as of the asset acquisition date was estimated using a concluded Enterprise Value of Intermediate’s business based on a weighting of derived value from the combination of two Income approaches to business valuation (Discounted Cash Flows and Relief from Royalty). Such business value underpinned a Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model to determine the ultimate contingent consideration liability balance.

In measuring the estimated amount payable under this arrangement as of December 31, 2022, we took into consideration a discounted cash flow valuation of the business based on internal projections as well as the business valuation implied by the proposed business combination transaction with CENAQ, which implied a value to existing equity holders of $225,000,000, and also considered the expected timing of the transaction closing which was assumed to occur in the first quarter of 2023. Such implied value and timing underpinned a Monte Carlo Simulation valuation model utilized in the determination of the contingent consideration liability balance (as similarly used in the prior periods). We also updated the probability of payment due to the increased likelihood of forfeiture of the contingent consideration payment as a result of an amendment to the terms and conditions of this contingent payment during the quarter ended September 30, 2022, as discussed further below. Accordingly, we recorded a reduction in contingent consideration totaling $7,551,000 during the year ended December 31, 2022, resulting in a contingent consideration liability balance of $1,299,000 as of December 31, 2022.

The contingent consideration liability determination using Monte Carlo Simulation was based on a number of assumptions including expected term, expected volatility, expected dividends, the risk-free interest rate, a discount rate (WACC), and probability of success, a specified contractual return hurdle (based on internal rate of return), and a contractual proportion of excess gain allocable to the contingent payment above the contractual return hurdle. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

On AprilAugust 5, 2012,2022, Holdings entered into an agreement with our management and CEO whereby, upon closing of the business combination with CENAQ, the contingent consideration would be forfeited. Following the closing on February 15, 2023, the contingent consideration was forfeited, and this arrangement was terminated and no payments were made. Thus, we reversed the entire $1,299,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2023. There were no contingent consideration arrangements as of December 31, 2023.

Impairment of Intangible Assets

A qualitative assessment of indefinite-lived intangible assets is performed in order to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. In performing this analysis, we consider macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, current and forecasted financial performance, entity-specific events and changes in the composition or carrying amount of net assets under the quantitative analysis, intellectual property and patents are tested for impairment using a discounted cash flow approach and tested for impairment using the relief-from-royalty method. If the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference.

We have considered a mix of information in monitoring the risks associated with impairment through the use of various valuation analyses which were used to measure the estimated fair value of our stock-based incentive awards. In addition, the Company considered market transactions (such as the Business Combination). As discussed above, substantially all of the value of the acquired assets from Primus was attributable to the intellectual property and patented technology. Such technology has remained our core asset since our acquisition and we have continued to develop such technology and expand its application to other feedstocks. 

In connection with our valuation of our stock-based incentive units granted to management, we determined our estimated enterprise value utilizing a mix of market approach, discounted cash flow and relief from royalty methods in the determination and such estimated enterprise value exceeded the carrying amount of this intangible asset by a substantial amount.

During the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we placed the most weight to the Business Combination in concluding that no impairment testing was required. We also leveraged the valuation analyses prepared in the measurement of our contingent consideration as discussed in detail above. Such transaction served to support management’s conclusion that fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible asset is greater than its carrying amount by a substantial amount, and no impairment charges were recognized in any of the periods presented. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2023, there were no events or changes in circumstances noted that would indicate that the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset may not be recoverable.


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment exist. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the estimated separately identifiable, undiscounted cash flows from such asset are less than the carrying value of the asset. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived asset. Fair value is determined primarily using the estimated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. There were no impairment charges in any of the periods presented.

Income taxes

The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under ASC 740, “Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment date. The Company has elected to use the outside basis approach to measure the deferred tax assets or liabilities based on its investment in its subsidiaries without regard to the underlying assets or liabilities.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considered whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. There were no unrecognized tax benefits and no amounts accrued for interest and penalties as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022. The Company is currently not aware of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviation from its position. The Company is subject to income tax examinations by major taxing authorities since inception.

Unit-Based Compensation

We apply the fair value method under ASC 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”), in accounting for unit-based compensation to employees. Service-based units compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the equity instruments awarded and is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, or the requisite service period, which is usually the vesting period. The fair value of the equity award granted is estimated on the date of the grant. Performance-based units are expensed over the requisite service period, based on the probability of achieving the performance goal, with changes in expectations recognized as an adjustment to earnings in the period of the change. If the performance goal is not met, no unit-based compensation expense is recognized. We accelerated the unvested service and performance-based units during the year ended December 31, 2023 in connection with the Business Combination. No service-based or performance-based incentive units were granted during the year ended December 31, 2023.


Share-Based Compensation

We apply ASC 718 in accounting for share-based compensation to employees. We estimate the fair value of stock options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. The fair value of RSUs granted is determined based on the value of our stock price on the date of the award subject to a discount for lack of marketability. Share-based compensation expense is recorded over the period during which the grantee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur.

The determination of fair value requires significant judgment and the use of estimates, particularly with regard to Black-Scholes assumptions such as stock price volatility and expected option term. We estimate the expected term of options granted based on peer benchmarking and expectations. We use the treasury yield curve rates for the risk-free interest rate in the option valuation model with maturities similar to the expected term of the options. Volatility is determined by reference to the actual volatility of several publicly traded peer companies that are similar to us in our industry sector. We do not anticipate paying cash dividends and therefore use an expected dividend yield of zero in the option valuation model. We assess whether a discount for lack of marketability is applied based on certain liquidity factors. All equity-based payment awards subject to graded vesting based only on a service condition are amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods.

There is substantial judgment in selecting the assumptions which we use to determine the fair value of such equity awards, and other companies could use similar market inputs and arrive at different conclusions.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 3 – Significant Accounting Policies in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for information regarding accounting pronouncements.

JOBS Act was signed into law. The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, relax certain reporting requirements for qualifying public companies.

We will qualify as an “emerging growth company” and under the JOBS Act will beare allowed to comply with new or revised accounting pronouncements based on the effective date for private (not publicly traded) companies. We haveCENAQ previously elected to irrevocably opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we will adopt the new or revised standard at the time public companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our consolidated financial statements with another emerging growth company that has not opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accountant standards used.

Additionally, we are in the process of evaluating the benefits of relying on the other reduced reporting requirements provided by the JOBS Act. Subject to certain conditions set forth in the JOBS Act, if, as an “emerging growth company”, we choose to rely on such exemptions we may not be required to, among other things, (i) provide an auditor’s attestation report on our system of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404, (ii) provide all of the compensation disclosure that may be required of non-emerging growth public companies under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, (iii) comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the PCAOB regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis), and (iv) disclose certain executive compensation related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the CEO’s compensation to median employee compensation. These exemptions will apply for a period of five years following the completion of the IPO or until we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” whichever is earlier.404.

ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Aboutabout Market RiskRisk.

Pursuant to Item 305(e) of Regulation S-K (§ 229.305(e)), the Company is not required to provide the information required by this Item as it is a “smaller reporting company,” as defined by Rule 229.10(f)(1).


ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

This information appears following Item 16 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

CENAQ ENERGY CORP.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 688)F-2
Financial Statements:
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and as of December 31, 2020F-3
Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 and for the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) to December 31, 2020F-4
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity for the year ended December 31, 2021 and for the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) to December 31, 2020F-5
Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2021 and for the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) to December 31, 2020F-6
Notes to Financial StatementsF-7


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholdersstockholders and the Board of Directors of Verde Clean Fuels, Inc.

CENAQ Energy Corp.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CENAQ Energy Corp.Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20212023, and 2020,2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficitequity, and cash flows, for each of the yeartwo years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and for the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020,2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”"financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021and 2020,2023, and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the yeartwo years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and for the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020,2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Explanatory Paragraph – Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 1, the Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has incurred significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit.audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB")(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our auditaudits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Marcum llp

 

Marcum llp/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

PCAOB ID 688

 

Dallas, Texas  

March 28, 2024

We have served as the Company’sCompany's auditor since 2020.2022.

New York, NY

March 29, 2022


CENAQ ENERGY CORP.

BALANCE SHEETSVERDE CLEAN FUELS, INC.

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Assets:      
Current assets:      
Cash $505,518  $11,120 
Prepaid expenses  223,144    
Total current assets  728,662   11,120 
Deferred offering costs     187,453 
Marketable securities held in trust account  174,229,680    
Total Assets $174,958,342  $198,573 
         
Liabilities, Redeemable Common Stock and Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity        
Current liabilities:        
Accrued offering costs and expenses $241,579  $89,953 
Promissory note - related party     88,333 
Total current liabilities  241,579   178,286 
Deferred underwriters’ discount  6,037,500    
Total Liabilities  6,279,079   178,286 
         
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)        
Class A common stock subject to possible redemption,17,250,000 and 0 shares at redemption value at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively  174,225,000    
         
Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity:        
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding      
Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 189,750 and 0 issued and outstanding (excluding 17,250,000 shares subject to possible redemption) at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively  19    
Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 4,312,500 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively  431   431 
Additional paid-in capital     24,569 
Accumulated deficit  (5,546,187)  (4,713)
Total Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity  (5,545,737)  20,287 
         
Total Liabilities, Redeemable Common Stock and Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity $174,958,342  $198,573 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  As of December 31, 
  2023  2022 
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents $28,779,177  $463,475 
Restricted cash  100,000   - 
Prepaid expenses  373,324   113,676 
Deferred transaction costs  -   3,258,880 
Deferred financing costs  -   6,277 
Total current assets  29,252,501   3,842,308 
         
Non-current assets:        
Security deposits  160,669   258,000 
Property, plant and equipment, net  62,505   7,414 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net  524,813   323,170 
Intellectual patented technology  1,925,151   1,925,151 
Total non-current assets  2,673,138   2,513,735 
Total assets $31,925,639  $6,356,043 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $184,343  $2,857,223 
Accrued liabilities  1,976,812   762,119 
Operating lease liabilities - current portion  297,380   237,970 
Notes payable - insurance premium financing  -   11,166 
Total current liabilities  2,458,535   3,868,478 
         
Non-current liabilities:        
Contingent consideration  -   1,299,000 
Promissory note – related party  409,612   - 
Operating lease liabilities  232,162   85,200 
Total non-current liabilities  641,774   1,384,200 
Total liabilities  3,100,309   5,252,678 
         
Stockholders’ equity        
Intermediate Member's Equity  -   12,775,901 
Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 9,387,836 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023  939   - 
Class C common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 22,500,000 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023  2,250   - 
Additional paid in capital  35,014,836   - 
Accumulated deficit  (23,922,730)  (11,672,536)
Noncontrolling interest  17,730,035   - 
Total stockholders’ equity  28,825,330   1,103,365 
         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $31,925,639  $6,356,043 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


CENAQ ENERGY CORP.VERDE CLEAN FUELS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

  For the 
year ended
December 31,
2021
  For the 
period from
June 24,
2020
(inception) to
December 31,
2020
 
       
Formation and operating costs $456,765  $4,713 
Loss from operations  (456,765)  (4,713)
         
Other income:        
Interest earned on marketable securities held in Trust Account  4,680    
Unrealized loss on fair value changes of over-allotment option liability  (22,500)   
Total other income  (17,820)   
         
Net loss $(474,585) $(4,713)
         
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding, common stock subject to redemption  6,462,329    
Basic and diluted net loss per common stock subject to redemption $(0.05) $ 
         
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding, non-redeemable common stock  4,029,134   3,750,000 
Basic and diluted net loss per non-redeemable  common stock $(0.05) $(0.00)
  For The Year Ended
December 31,
 
  2023  2022 
       
General and administrative expenses $11,515,192  $4,514,994 
Contingent consideration  (1,299,000)  (7,551,000)
Research and development expenses  329,194   316,712 
Total operating loss (income)  10,545,386   (2,719,294)
         
Other (income)  (447,074)  - 
Interest expense  236,699   - 
Loss (income) before income taxes  10,335,011   (2,719,294)
Provision for income taxes  166,265   - 
Net (loss) income $(10,501,276) $2,719,294 
Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest  (7,757,688)  - 
Net (loss) income attributable to Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. $(2,743,588) $2,719,294 
         
Earnings per share        
Weighted average Class A common stock outstanding, basic and diluted  6,140,529   N/A 
Loss per Share of Class A common stock $(0.45)  N/A 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


CENAQ ENERGY CORP.VERDE CLEAN FUELS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021

AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM JUNE 24, 2020 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBERFor The Year Ended December 31, 20202022

  Class A Common Stock  Class B Common Stock  

Additional

Paid-in

  Accumulated  Total
Stockholder’s
(Deficit)
 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
Balance as of June 24, 2020 (inception)    $     $  $  $  $ 
Issuance of Class B common stock to initial stockholders        4,312,500   431   24,569      25,000 
Net loss                 (4,713)  (4,713)
Balance as of December 31, 2020    $   4,312,500  $431  $24,569  $(4,713) $20,287 
                             
Issuance of 189,750 representative shares to underwriters  189,750   19         1,442,081      1,442,100 
Excess of fair value of Anchor Shares              6,265,215      6,265,215 
Fair value of 12,937,500 Public Warrants net of allocated offering costs              11,627,801      11,627,801 
Proceeds of 6,675,000  Private Placement Warrants net of allocated offering costs              6,366,396      6,366,396 
Reclassification of over-allotment Liability to Equity              180,000      180,000 
Measurement adjustment of Class A common stock subject to possible redemption              (25,906,062)  (5,066,889)  (30,972,951)
Net loss                 (474,585)  (474,585)
Balance as of December 31, 2021  189,750  $19   4,312,500  $431  $  $(5,546,187) $(5,545,737)
  Member's
Equity
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Total Member's
Equity
 
Balance - December 31, 2021 $7,605,369  $(14,391,830) $(6,786,461)
Capital contribution  3,750,000   -   3,750,000 
Unit-based compensation expense  1,420,532   -   1,420,532 
Net income  -   2,719,294   2,719,294 
Balance December 31, 2022 $12,775,901  $(11,672,536) $1,103,365 

For The Year Ended December 31, 2023

  Member’s  Preferred Stock  Class A Common  Class C Common  Additional
Paid in
  Accumulated  Non-
Controlling
  Total 
  Equity  Shares  Values  Shares  Values  Shares  Values  Capital  Deficit  Interest  Equity 
Balance - December 31, 2022 $12,775,901          -  $        -   -  $-   -  $-  $-  $(11,672,536) $-  $1,103,365 
Retroactive application of recapitalization  -   -   -   -   936   -   2,573   (3,509)  -   -   - 
Adjusted beginning balance  12,775,901   -   -   -   936   -   2,573   (3,509)  (11,672,536)  -   1,103,365 
Reversal of Intermediate original equity  (12,775,901)  -   -   -   (936)  -   (2,573)  3,509   11,672,536   -   (1,103,365)
Recapitalization transaction  -   -   -   9,358,620   936   22,500,000   2,250   15,391,286   (4,793,142)  25,487,723   36,089,053 
Class A Sponsor earn out shares  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   5,792,000   (5,792,000)  -   - 
Class C earn out shares  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   10,594,000   (10,594,000)  -   - 
Stock-based compensation  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   2,901,569   -   -   2,901,569 
Warrant exercise  -   -   -   29,216   3   -   -   335,981   -   -   335,984 
Net (loss)  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (2,743,588)  (7,757,688)  (10,501,276)
Balance - December 31, 2023 $-   -  $-   9,387,836  $939   22,500,000  $2,250  $35,014,836  $(23,922,730) $17,730,035  $28,825,330 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


CENAQ ENERGY CORP.VERDE CLEAN FUELS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  For the 
year ended
December 31, 
2021
  For the 
period from 
June 24, 
2020
(inception) to
December 31, 
2020
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:      
Net loss $(474,585) $(4,713)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Interest earned on marketable securities held in Trust Account  (4,680)   
Unrealized loss on fair value changes of over-allotment option liability  22,500     
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Prepaid expenses  (223,144)   
Accrued expenses  151,626   2,500 
Net cash used in operating activities  (528,283)  (2,213)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Principal deposited in Trust Account  (174,225,000)   
Net cash used in investing activities  (174,225,000)   
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from issuance of founder shares     25,000 
Proceeds from issuance of promissory note to related party     58,333 
Repayment of promissory note to related party     (20,000)
Proceeds from Initial Public Offering, net of underwriters’ fees  169,050,000    
Proceeds from private placement  6,675,000    
Proceeds from issuance of promissory note to related party  225,000    
Repayment of promissory note to related party  (329,317)   
Payment of deferred offering costs  (373,002)  (50,000)
Net cash provided by financing activities  175,247,681   13,333 
         
Net change in cash  494,398   11,120 
Cash, beginning of the period  11,120    
Cash, end of the period $505,518  $11,120 
         
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:        
Accrued deferred offering costs $  $87,453 
Deferred offering costs paid by Sponsor in promissory note $  $50,000 
Deferred underwriting commissions charged to additional paid in capital $6,037,500  $ 
Measurement adjustment of carrying value of Class A stock to redemption value $30,972,951  $ 
Reclassification of over-allotment option from liability to equity $180,000  $ 
  For The Year Ended
December 31,
 
  2023  2022 
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net (loss) income $(10,501,276) $2,719,294 
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in operating activities        
Contingent consideration  (1,299,000)  (7,551,000)
Depreciation  3,497   10,034 
Finance lease amortization  127,617   - 
Unit-based compensation expense  2,901,569   1,420,532 
Deferred financing fee write-off  28,847   - 
Amortization of right-of-use assets  413,354   237,850 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities        
Prepaid expenses  (259,648)  17,053 
Security deposits  (10,669)  (108,000)
Accounts payable  (6,645)  108,121 
Accrued liabilities and other  185,912   104,819 
Operating lease liabilities  (383,778)  (237,850)
Income taxes payable  (312,446)  - 
Net cash used in operating activities  (9,112,666)  (3,279,147)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Purchases of property, equipment and improvements  (58,588)  (4,411)
Net cash used in investing activities  (58,588)  (4,411)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
PIPE proceeds  32,000,000   - 
Cash received from Trust  19,031,516   - 
Less transaction expenses  (10,043,793)  - 
Holdings capital repayment  (3,750,000)  - 
Repayments of notes payable - insurance premium financing  (11,166)  (73,987)
Repayments of the principal portion of finance lease liabilities  (44,469)  - 
Deferred transaction costs  -   (10,341)
Deferred financing costs  (22,570)  (6,277)
Warrant exercises  335,984   - 
Capital contribution  -   3,750,000 
Net cash provided by financing activities  37,495,502   3,659,395 
         
Net increase in cash  28,324,248   375,837 
         
Cash, beginning of year  463,475   87,638 
CENAQ operating cash balance acquired  91,454   - 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, end of year $28,879,177  $463,475 

  For The Year Ended
December 31
 
 2023  2022 
Supplemental cash flow information:      
Non-cash income tax payable and deferred tax liability obtained from CENAQ $431,632   - 
Non-cash impact of debt issuance through the Business Combination $409,612   - 
Non-cash deferred transaction costs  -  $3,248,539 
Cash paid for interest $236,699   - 
Cash paid for income taxes $431,632   - 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


CENAQ ENERGY CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


NoteNOTE 1 — Organization and Business OperationsTHE COMPANY

CENAQ Energy Corp.Overview

Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. (the “Company”) is a newly organized blank checkclean energy technology company incorporatedspecializing in the conversion of synthesis gas, or syngas, derived from diverse feedstocks, such as biomass or natural gas and other feedstocks, into liquid hydrocarbons, primarily gasoline, through an innovative and proprietary liquid fuels technology, the STG+® process. Through Verde Clean Fuels’ STG+® process, Verde Clean Fuels converts syngas into Reformulated Blend-stock for Oxygenate Blending (“RBOB”) gasoline. Verde Clean Fuels is focused on the development of technology and commercial facilities aimed at turning waste and other feedstocks into a usable stream of syngas which is then transformed into a single finished fuel, such as gasoline, without any additional refining steps. The availability of biogenic feedstocks and the economic and environmental drivers that divert these materials from landfills will enable us to utilize these waste streams to produce renewable gasoline from modular production facilities.

NOTE 2 – BUSINESS COMBINATION

On February 15, 2023 (the “Closing Date”), the Company finalized a business combination (“Business Combination”) pursuant to that certain business combination agreement, dated as of August 12, 2022 (“Business Combination Agreement”) by and among CENAQ Energy Corp. (“CENAQ”), Verde Clean Fuels OpCo, LLC, a Delaware corporationlimited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of CENAQ (“OpCo”), Bluescape Clean Fuels Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Holdings”), Bluescape Clean Fuels Intermediate Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Intermediate”), and CENAQ Sponsor LLC (“Sponsor”). Immediately upon the completion of the Business Combination, CENAQ was renamed to Verde Clean Fuels, Inc.

Prior to the Business Combination, and up to the transaction close on June 24, 2020. The CompanyFebruary 15, 2023, Verde Clean Fuels, previously CENAQ Energy Corp., was a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”) incorporated for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stockshare exchange, asset acquisition, stockshare purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses (the “Business Combination”). The Company has not reached an agreement with any specificbusinesses.

Pursuant to the Business Combination target. The Company is focusingAgreement, (i) (A) CENAQ contributed to OpCo (1) all of its search forassets (excluding its interests in OpCo and the aggregate amount of cash required to satisfy any exercise by CENAQ stockholders of their redemption rights (the “Redemption Rights”) and (2) the shares of Class C common stock (the “Holdings Class C Shares”) and (B) in exchange therefor, OpCo issued to CENAQ a target business in the energy industry in North America.

Asnumber of December 31, 2021, the Company has neither engaged in any operations nor generated any revenues. All activity for the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2021 relatesClass A OpCo Units equal to the Company’s formation and the initial public offering (“IPO”), described below. The Company will not generate any operating revenues until after the completionnumber of its initial Business Combination, at the earliest. The Company will generate non-operating income in the formtotal shares of interest income from the proceeds derived from the IPO. The Company has selected December 31 as its fiscal year end.

The Company’s sponsor is CENAQ Sponsor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Sponsor”).

The registration statement for the Company’s IPO was declared effective on August 12, 2021 (the “Effective Date”). On August 17, 2021, Company consummated its IPO of 15,000,000 units (the “Units”). Each Unit consists of one Class A common stock of the Company, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Class A common stock”),issued and three-quarters of one redeemable warrant of the Company (“Warrant”), each whole Warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one Class A common stock for $11.50 per share. The Units were sold at a price of $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds to the Company of $150,000,000, which is discussed in Note 3.

Certain qualified institutional buyers or institutional accredited investors which are not affiliated with any member of the Company’s management (the “Anchor Investors”) have purchased up to 1,485,000 Units in the IPO at the offering price of $10.00 per Unit, generating gross proceeds to the Company of $14,850,000 included in the gross proceeds from units offered to public of $150,000,000.

In connection with the closing of the IPO, the Sponsor sold membership interest reflecting an allocation of 75,000 founder shares, or an aggregate of 825,000 founder shares, to each anchor investor at their original purchase price of approximately $0.0058 per share.

The Company estimated the aggregate fair value of these founder shares attributable to anchor investors to be $6,270,000, or $7.60 per share.  The Company allocated $6,265,215, the excess of the fair value over the gross proceeds from these anchor investors, among Class A common stock, Public Warrants and Private Placement Warrants (defined below).

Substantially with the closing of the IPO, the Company completed the private sale of an aggregate of 6,000,000 warrants (the “Private Placement Warrants”) to the Sponsor and the Underwriters at a purchase price of $1.00 per Private Placement Warrant, generating gross proceeds to the Company of $6,000,000. The Private Placement Warrants are identical to the Warrants sold in the IPO, except that the Sponsor and the Underwriters agreed not to transfer, assign or sell any of the Private Placement Warrants (except to certain permitted transferees) until 30 daysoutstanding immediately after the completion ofClosing Date (taking into account the Company’s initial Business Combination.

The underwriters have a 45-day option from the date of the Company’s IPO (August 17, 2021) to purchase up to an additional 2,250,000 Units to cover over-allotments, if any. On August 19, 2021, the underwriters exercised the over-allotment in full, at $10.00 per Unit, generating additional gross proceeds of $22,500,000. Simultaneously with the closing of the over-allotment, the Company consummated the sale of additional 450,000 Private Placement Warrants to the Sponsor, and additional 225,000 Private Placement Warrants to the Underwriters, at $1.00 per warrant, generating gross proceeds to the Company of $675,000.

Transaction costs of the IPO and the over-allotment amounted to $17,771,253 consisting of $3,450,000 of underwriting discount, $6,037,500 of deferred underwriting discount, an excess of fair value of the founder shares acquired by the Anchor Investors of $6,265,215, fair value of 189,750 representative shares of $1,442,100 and $576,438 of other cash offering costs were charged to additional paid in capital.


Following the closing of the IPO on August 17, 2021 and over-allotment on August 19, 2021, $174,225,000 ($10.10 per Unit) from the net proceeds of the sale of the Units in the IPO, and a portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Private Placement Warrants, was deposited in a trust account (“Trust Account”), located in the United States with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company acting as trustee, and may only be invested in U.S. government securities, within the meaning set forth in Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act, having a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations. Except with respect to interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account that may be released to the Company to pay franchise and income tax obligations as well as expenses relating to the administration of the Trust Account, the proceeds from the IPO and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants will not be released from the Trust Account until the earliest of (i) the completion of initial Business Combination, (ii) the redemption of the any public shares properly submitted in connection with a stockholder vote to amend the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation (a) to modify the substance or timing of the Company’s obligation to redeem 100% of its public shares if the Company does not complete initial Business Combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if the Company extends the period of time to consummate its initial Business Combination) from August 17, 2021, or (b) relating to any other provisions relating to stockholders’ rights or permitted pre-initial business combination activity, or (iii) the redemption of the Company’s public shares if the Company is unable to complete its Business Combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if the Company extends the period of time to consummate its initial Business Combination) from August 17, 2021, subject to applicable law. The proceeds deposited in the Trust Account could become subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors, if any, which could have priority over the claims of the Company’s public stockholders, according to the investment management trust agreement.

The Company must complete one or more initial Business Combinations having an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the value of the assets held in the Trust AccountPIPE Financing (as defined below) (excludingand following the deferred underwriting commissionsexercise of Redemption Rights) (such transactions, the “SPAC Contribution”) and taxes payable on(ii) immediately following the income earned on the Trust Account) at the timeSPAC Contribution, (A) Holdings contributed to OpCo 100% of the agreementissued and outstanding limited liability company interests of Intermediate and (B) in exchange therefor, OpCo transferred to enter intoHoldings the initial Business Combination. However,Holdings OpCo Units and the Company will only complete a Business Combination if the post-transaction company owns or acquires 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquires a controlling interest in the target sufficient for the post-transaction company not to be required to register asHoldings Class C Shares. Holdings holds 22,500,000 OpCo Units and an investment company under the Investment Company Act 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). There is no assurance that the Company will be able to complete a Business Combination successfully.

The Company will provide its public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their public shares upon the completion of the initial Business Combination either (i) in connection with a stockholder meeting called to approve the Business Combination or (ii) by means of a tender offer. The decision as to whether the Company will seek stockholder approval of a proposed Business Combination or conduct a tender offer will be made by the Company, solely in its discretion. The stockholders will be entitled to redeem all or a portion of their public shares upon the completion of the initial Business Combination at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account as of two business days prior to the consummation of the initial Business Combination, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to the Company to pay its franchise and income taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the Trust Account, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, subject to the limitations described herein. The amount in the Trust Account was $10.10 per public share. The per-share amount the Company will distribute to investors who properly redeem their shares will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting commissions the Company will pay to the underwriters.

The shares of Class C common stock subjectstock.

Pursuant to redemption will be recorded at a redemption value and classified as temporary equity upon the completion of the IPO, in accordance withFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.” In such case,805, “Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”), the Company will proceed with a Business Combination ifis accounted for as a common control reverse recapitalization where Intermediate is deemed the Company has net tangible assets of at least $5,000,001 upon such consummation of a Business Combinationaccounting acquirer and if the Company seeks stockholder approval, a majority of the issued and outstanding shares voted are voted in favor of the Business Combination.

The Company will have until August 17, 2022, 12 months from the closing of the IPO, to complete the initial Business Combination (the “Combination Period”). If the Company anticipates that it may not be able to consummate its initial Business Combination within the Combination Period, it may, but not obligated to, extend the Combination Period two times by an additional three months each time (for a total of up to 18 months to complete a Business Combination); provided that the Sponsor (or its designees) must deposit into the trust account funds equal to one percent (1%) of the gross proceeds of the offering (including such proceeds from the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option, if exercised) for each 3-month extension of the time period to complete the initial Business Combination, in exchange for a non-interest bearing, unsecured promissory note.

If the Company is unable to complete the initial Business Combination within the Combination Period (or up to 18 months following extensions), the Company will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to the Company to pay its franchise and income taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the Trust Account (less up to $100,000 of interest released to the Company to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of the Company’s remaining stockholders and the Company’s board of directors, liquidate and dissolve, subject, in each case, to the Company’s obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law.


The Sponsor, officers and directors, as welltreated as the Anchor Investors, have agreed to (i) waive their redemption rightsaccounting acquiree, with respect to any Founder Shares held by them in connection with the completion of the initial Business Combination, (ii) waive their rights to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to any Founder Shares hold by them if the Company fails to complete the initial Business Combination within the Combination Period (or within 18 months following extensions), and (iii) vote any Founder Shares held by them and any public shares purchased during or after the IPO in favor of the initial Business Combination.

The Anchor Investors are not required to vote any of their public shares (as opposed to their Founder Shares) in favor of our initial business combination or for or against any other matter presented for a stockholder vote.

The Sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to the Company if and to the extent any claims by a third party (other than the Company’s independent auditors ) for services rendered or products sold to the Company, or a prospective target business with which the Company has discussed entering into a transaction agreement, reduce the amount of funds in the Trust Account to below the lesser of (i) $10.10 per public share and (ii) such lesser amount per public share held in the Trust Account as of the date of the liquidation of the Trust Account, due to reductions in value of the trust assets, in each case net of the amount of interest which may be withdrawn to pay taxes as well as expenses relating to the administration of the Trust Account, except as to any claims by a third party who executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the Trust Account and except as to any claims under the Company’s indemnity of the underwriters of the IPO against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. In the event that an executed waiver is deemed to be unenforceable against a third party, then the Sponsor will not be responsible to the extent of any liability for such third-party claims. The Company will seek to reduce the possibility that the Sponsor will have to indemnify the Trust Account due to claims of creditors by endeavoring to have all vendors, service providers, prospective target businessesno goodwill or other entities with which the Company does business, execute agreements with the Company waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kindintangible assets recorded, in or to monies held in the Trust Account.

Risks and Uncertainties

Management is continuing to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the industry and has concluded that while it is reasonably possible that the virus could have a negative effect on the Company’s financial position, results of its operations and/or search for a target company, the specific impact is not readily determinable as of the date of this financial statement. The financial statement does not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Liquidity and Going Concern

As of December 31, 2021, the Company had $505,518 in its operating bank account, and working capital of $487,083.

The Company’s liquidity needs up to December 31, 2021 had been satisfied through a payment from the Sponsor of $25,000 for the Founder Shares (see Note 5) and no borrowings under the promissory note. Upon close of the IPO, there was no amount outstanding on the promissory note.

In order to finance transaction costs in connection with a Business Combination, the Company’s Sponsor or an affiliate of the Sponsor or certain of the Company’s officers and directors committed to provide the Company with Working Capital Loans up to $1,500,000, as defined later (see Note 5). This commitment extends through August 17, 2022. To date, there were no amounts outstanding under any Working Capital Loans.

If the Company’s estimate of the costs of identifying a target business, undertaking in-depth due diligence and negotiating a Business Combination are less than the actual amount necessary to do so, the Company may have insufficient funds available to operate its business prior to the Business Combination. Moreover, the Company may need to obtain additional financing either to complete its Business Combination or because it becomes obligated to redeem a significant number of its public shares upon consummation of the Business Combination, in which case the Company may issue additional securities or incur debt in connection with such Business Combination. Subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, the Company would only complete such financing simultaneously with the completion of the Business Combination. If the Company is unable to complete its Business Combination because it does not have sufficient funds available to it, the Company will be forced to cease operations and liquidate the Trust Account. In addition, following the Business Combination, if cash on hand is insufficient, the Company may need to obtain additional financing in order to meet its obligations.

We cannot assure you that our plans to raise capital or to consummate an initial business combination will be successful. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, which could impact our business plan. The financial statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report do not include any adjustments that might result from our inability to continue as a going concern.


Note 2— Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements are presented in conformityaccordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). The Business Combination is not treated as a change in control of Intermediate. This determination reflects Holdings holding a majority of the voting power of Verde Clean Fuels, Intermediate’s pre-Business Combination operations being the majority post-Business Combination operations of Verde Clean Fuels, and Intermediate’s management team retaining similar roles at Verde Clean Fuels. Further, Holdings continues to have control of the Board of Directors through its majority voting rights. Under ASC 805, the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of Intermediate are recognized at their carrying amounts on the date of the Business Combination.


Following the completion of the Business Combination, the combined company is organized in an “Up-C” structure and the only direct assets of the Company, consists of equity interests in OpCo, whose only direct assets consists of equity interests in Intermediate. Immediately following the Business Combination, Verde Clean Fuels is the sole manager of and controls OpCo.

The Business Combination includes:

Holdings contributing 100% of the issued and outstanding limited liability company interests of Intermediate to OpCo in exchange for 22,500,000 Class C OpCo Units and an equal number of shares of Class C common stock;

The issuance and sale of 3,200,000 shares of Class A common stock for a purchase price of $10.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $32,000,000 (the “PIPE Financing”);

Delivery of $19,031,516 of proceeds from CENAQ’s Trust Account related to non-redeeming Holders of 1,846,120 of Class A common stock; and

Repayment of $3,750,000 of capital contributions made by Holdings since December 2021 and payment of $10,043,793 of transaction expenses including deferred underwriting fees of $1,700,000;

The following summarizes the Verde Clean Fuels Class A common stock and Class C common stock (collectively, the “Common Stock”) outstanding as of February 15, 2023. The percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 31,858,620 shares of Company Common Stock issued and outstanding as of February 15, 2023, comprised of 9,358,620 shares of Class A common stock and 22,500,000 shares of Class C common stock.

  Shares  % of
Common
Stock
 
CENAQ Public Stockholders(a)  1,846,120   5.79%
Holdings(b)  23,300,000   73.14%
New PIPE Investors (excluding Holdings)(c)  2,400,000   7.53%
Sponsor and Anchor Investors(d)  1,078,125   3.39%
Sponsor Earn Out shares(e)  3,234,375   10.15%
Total Shares of Common Stock at Closing  31,858,620   100.00%
Earn Out Equity shares(f)  3,500,000     
Total diluted shares at Closing (including shares above)(g)  35,358,620     

(a)CENAQ public stockholders holding 15,403,880 shares of Class A common stock exercised their right to redeem such shares for a pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account. Excludes 189,750 underwriters forfeited shares owned by Imperial Capital, LLC and I-Bankers Securities, Inc. that were forfeited as of Closing.

(b)Includes (i) 22,500,000 shares of Class C common stock issued to Holdings at Closing, representing 100% of the shares of Class C common stock outstanding as of February 15, 2023, and (ii) 800,000 shares of Class A common stock acquired by Holdings in the PIPE Financing.

(c)Excludes 800,000 shares of Class A common stock acquired by Holdings in the PIPE Financing.

(d)Includes 253,125 and 825,000 shares of Class A common stock issued to the Sponsor and other investors, respectively, upon conversion of a portion of their current Class B common stock at Closing.

(e)Includes 3,234,375 shares of Class A common stock issued to the Sponsor that are subject to forfeiture. These shares will no longer be subject to forfeiture upon the occurrence of the Triggering Events. Excludes 2,475,000 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Private Placement Warrants held by Sponsor.

(f)Includes 3,500,000 shares of Class C common stock issuable to Holdings upon the occurrence of  triggering events.

(g)Excludes 12,937,479 and 2,475,000 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Public Warrants and Private Placement Warrants, respectively.


Total proceeds raised from the Business Combination were $37,329,178, consisting of $32,000,000 in PIPE Financing proceeds, $19,031,516 from the CENAQ trust, and $91,454 from the CENAQ operating account offset by $10,043,793 in transaction expenses which were recorded as a reduction to additional paid in capital and offset by a $3,750,000 capital repayment to Holdings.

As of December 31, 2023, no Class C OpCo units have been exchanged for shares of Class A common stock.

NOTE 3 — SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statement is presented in conformity with GAAP and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. SecuritiesSEC.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Inits subsidiaries for which the opinionCompany controls by ownership interest or other contractual rights giving the Company control over the most significant activities of management, all adjustments (consistingan investee. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of normal recurring adjustments)Verde Clean Fuels, and its subsidiaries OpCo, Intermediate, Bluescape Clean Fuels Employee Holdings, LLC, Bluescape Clean Fuels EmployeeCo., LLC, Bluescape Clean Fuels, LLC, and Maricopa Renewable Fuels I, LLC.

All intercompany balances and transactions have been madeeliminated in consolidation.

Risks and uncertainties

The Company is currently in the development stage and has not yet commenced principal operations or generated revenue. The development of the Company’s projects are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the receipt of the necessary permits and regulatory approvals, commodity price risk impacting the decision to go forward with the projects, the availability and ability to obtain the necessary financing for the construction and development of projects.

The Company’s ability to develop and operate commercial production facilities, as well as expand production at future commercial production facilities, is subject to many risks beyond its control, including regulatory developments, construction risks, and global and regional macroeconomic developments.

Inflation Reduction Act of 2022

On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IR Act”) was signed into federal law. The IR Act provides for, among other things, a new U.S. federal 1% excise tax on certain repurchases of stock, in which the cumulative fair market value is greater than $1 million in a calendar year, by publicly traded U.S. domestic corporations and certain U.S. domestic subsidiaries of publicly traded foreign corporations occurring on or after January 1, 2023. The excise tax is imposed on the repurchasing corporation itself, not its shareholders from which shares are repurchased. The amount of the excise tax is generally 1% of the fair market value of the shares repurchased at the time of the repurchase. The amount of repurchases applicable to the excise tax can be reduced by the fair market value of any issuances at the time of issuance that are necessary to present fairlyoccurred during the financial position,year, as well as certain exceptions provided by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”). The Treasury and the resultsIRS released interim guidance on December 27, 2022, which can be relied upon until the issuance of its operationsproposed regulations.

In connection with the Business Combination, the Company incurred an excise tax of $1.59 million based on the redemption of $158.9 million at the request of the Common A shareholders. The excise tax is payable in the second quarter of 2024 and its cash flows.is recorded within accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2023. Other than the 1% excise tax, the IR Act has not had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


 

Emerging Growth Company Status

The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (the “Securities Act”), as modified by the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012, (the “JOBS Act”), and it may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

Further, SectionAdditionally, section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect not to opt outtake advantage of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies, butand any such election to opt outnot take advantage of the extended transition period is irrevocable. The Company hasexpects to be an emerging growth company through 2026. Prior to the Business Combination, CENAQ elected not to irrevocably opt out of suchthe extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, the Company as an emerging growth company, canwill adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of the Company’s financial statements with anotherwhen those standards are effective for public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.registrants.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment. It is at least reasonably possible that the estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the consolidated financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate, could change in the near term due to one or more future confirming events. The most significant estimates that affected the financial statements as of December 31, 2021 arepertain to the calculations of the fair values of the over-allotment option, fair valuesequity instruments, contingent consideration, impairment of the representative sharesintangible and the fair values of the anchor shares.long-lived assets and income taxes. Such estimates may be subject to change as more current information becomes available. Accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

 

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

As of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $28,779,177 and $463,475, respectively. The Company also had a restricted cash balance of $100,000 and $0 as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, for a letter of credit that is included in the determination of cash and restricted cash in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The Company considers all short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. TheAs of December 31, 2023, the Company hashad cash equivalents of $26,155,789, which were comprised of funds held in a short-term money market fund having investments in high-quality short-term securities that are issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or by U.S. government agencies and instrumentalities. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.2022.

Marketable Securities held in Trust Account

As of December 31, 2021, the Company had $174,229,680 in Marketable Securities held in the Trust Account which was invested in BLF Treasury Trust Fund. Upon closing of the IPO, $10.10 per Unit sold in the IPO, including a portion of the proceeds of the sale of the Private Placement Warrants, were held in a trust account (“Trust Account”) and may be invested only in U.S. government securities with a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations.


Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of a cash account in a financial institution, which, at times, may exceed the Federal DepositoryDeposit Insurance Corporation coverage limit of $250,000. AtAs of December 31, 2021,2023, the Company has not experienced losses on this account.these accounts and management believes the Company is not exposed to significant risks on such accounts.

Offering Costs associated with the Initial Public Offering

Offering costs consist of underwriting, legal, accounting and other expenses incurred through the balance sheet date that are directly related to the IPO. The Company complies with the requirements of the ASC 340-10-S99-1 and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 5A “Expenses of Offering”. Offering costs are allocated to the separable financial instruments issued in the IPO based on a relative fair value basis compared to total proceeds received.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of the Company’s assets and liabilities other than the over-allotment option, which qualify as financial instruments under FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,”Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) approximates the carrying amounts represented in the balance sheet, primarily duesheet. The fair values of cash, restricted cash, cash equivalents, prepaid expenses, and accrued expenses are estimated to its short-term nature. The net asset value for the investments held in the trust accountapproximate their respective carrying values as of December 31, 2021 was $174,229,680.2023 and December 31, 2022 due to the short-term maturities of such instruments.


In determining fair value, the valuation techniques consistent with the market approach, income approach and cost approach shall be used to measure fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy for inputs, which represent the assumptions used by the buyer and seller in pricing the asset or liability. These inputs are further defined as observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs are those that buyer and seller would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs that the buyer and seller would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.

The fair value hierarchy is categorized into three levels based on the inputs as follows:

Level 1 — Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Valuation adjustments and block discounts are not being applied. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these securities does not entail a significant degree of judgment.

Level 2 — Valuations based on (i) quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, (ii) quoted prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets, (iii) inputs other than quoted prices for the assets or liabilities, or (iv) inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market through correlation or other means.

Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. The fair value of certain of

Net Loss Per Common Stock

Subsequent to the Business Combination, the Company’s assets and liabilities, which qualify as financial instruments under ASC 820, approximates the carrying amounts represented in the balance sheet. The fair valuescapital structure is comprised of cash, prepaid expenses, and accrued expenses are estimated to approximate the carrying values as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 due to the short maturities of such instruments.

The Company valued the over-allotment option using the Black Scholes model and the over-allotment option liability is recorded as a Level 3 financial instruments due to the unobservable inputs. At August 17, 2021 the Company recorded $157,500 of over-allotment liability. On August 19, 2021, in connection with the fully exercise of over-allotment option by the underwriters, the Company recorded changes of fair value of over-allotment option of $22,500, and reclassified $180,000 of over-allotment liability into equity.

Over-allotment Option Liability

The Company accounted for the over-allotment option (Note 6) in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 480. The over-allotment is not considered indexed to the Company's own ordinary shares, and as such, it does not meet the criteria for equity treatment and is recorded as liabilities. The fair value changes of over-allotment option liability between IPO closing date and the option exercise date was recorded in operations. 

Class A common stock Subject to Possible Redemption

The Company accounts for its Class A common stock subject to possible redemption in accordance with the guidance in ASC Topic 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.” Common stock subject to mandatory redemption (if any) are classified as a liability instrument and measured at fair value. Conditionally redeemable common stock (including common stock that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control) are classified as temporary equity. At all other times, common stock is classified as stockholders’ equity. At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, 17,250,000 and 0 Class A common stock, respectively, subject to possible redemption are presented at redemption value as temporary equity, outside of the stockholders’ equity section of the Company’s balance sheet.

All of the 17,250,000 shares of Class A common stock, sold as partpar value $0.0001 per share (the “Class A common stock”) and shares of Class C common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Class C common stock”). Public shareholders, the UnitsSponsor, and the investors in the IPO contain a redemption feature which allows for the redemptionprivate offering of such public shares if there is a stockholder vote or tender offersecurities of Verde Clean Fuels in connection with the Business Combination and in connection with certain amendments to the Company’s certificate(the PIPE Financing) hold shares of incorporation.


The Class A common stock sold as part of the Units in the IPO is subject to ASC 480-10-S99. If it is probable that the equity instrument will become redeemable, the Company has the option to either accrete changes in the redemption value over the period from the date of issuance (or from the date that it becomes probable that the instrument will become redeemable, if later) to the earliest redemption date of the instrument or to recognize changes in the redemption value immediately as they occur and adjust the carrying amount of the instrument to equal the redemption value at the end of each reporting period. The Company recognizes changes in redemption value immediately as they occur. Immediately upon the closing of the IPO, the Company recognized the subsequent re-measurement under ASC 480-10-S99 from initial carrying amount to redemption value. The change in the carrying value of redeemable common stock resulted in charges against additional paid-in capital and accumulated deficit.

As the holder of representative shares and Class B common stock have agreed to waive their redemption rights per the letter agreement and the underwriting agreement, so the representative shares and Class B common stock are non-redeemable.

Net Loss Per Common Stock

The Company has two classes of common stock, which are referred to as Class A common stock and warrants, and Holdings owns shares of Class B common stock. Earnings and losses are shared pro rata between the two classes of shares. The 19,612,500 potentialC common stock forand Class C units of OpCo (the “Class C OpCo Units”). Class C common stock represents the right to cast one vote per share at the Verde Clean Fuels level, and carry no economic rights, including rights to dividends and distributions upon liquidation. Thus, Class C common stock are not participating securities per ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share” (“ASC 260”). As the Class A common stock represent the only participating securities, the application of the two-class method is not required.

Antidilutive instruments including outstanding warrants, to purchase the Company’s common stock options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and Sponsor earnout shares were excluded from diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 20212023 because the warrants are contingently exercisable, and the contingencies have not yet been met and its inclusion of such instruments would be anti-dilutive. As a result, diluted net loss per common stock is the same as basic net loss per common stock.

Warrants

The Company accounts for warrants as either equity-classified or liability-classified instruments based on an assessment of the warrant’s specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” (“ASC 480”) and ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”). Management’s assessment considers whether the warrants are freestanding financial instruments pursuant to ASC 480, whether they meet the definition of a liability pursuant to ASC 480, and whether the warrants meet all of the requirements for equity classification under ASC 815, including whether the warrants are indexed to the Company’s own common stock and whether the warrant holders could potentially require “net cash settlement” in a circumstance outside of the Company’s control, among other conditions for equity classification. This assessment, which requires the use of professional judgment, is conducted at the time of warrant issuance and as of each subsequent quarterly period-end date while the warrants are outstanding.

For issued or modified warrants that meet all of the criteria for equity classification, they are recorded as a component of additional paid-in capital at the time of issuance. For issued or modified warrants that do not meet all the criteria for equity classification, they are recorded at their initial fair value on the date of issuance and subject to remeasurement each balance sheet date with changes in the estimated fair value of the warrants to be recognized as a non-cash gain or loss in the statement of operations. See Note 8 for further information.


Segments

Operating segments are defined as components of an entity for which separate financial information is available and that is regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing performance. The Company’s CODM is its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The Company has determined that it operates in one operating segment, as the CODM reviews financial information presented on a combined basis for purposes of making operating decisions, allocating resources, and evaluating financial performance.

Reverse recapitalization

The Business Combination was accounted for according to a common control reverse recapitalization, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded, in accordance with GAAP. This determination reflects Holdings holding a majority of the voting power of Intermediate’s pre and post Business Combination operations and Intermediate’s management team retaining similar roles at Verde Clean Fuels. Further, Holdings continues to have control of the Board of Directors through its majority voting rights.

Under the guidance in ASC 805, for transactions between entities under common control, the assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests of CENAQ and Intermediate are recognized at their carrying amounts on the date of the business combination. Under this method of accounting, CENAQ is treated as the “acquired” company for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, for accounting purposes, the business combination is treated as the equivalent of Intermediate issuing stock for the periods.net assets of CENAQ, accompanied by a recapitalization. The table below presents a reconciliationnet assets of Intermediate are stated at their historical value within the financial statements with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded.

Property, Equipment, and Improvements

Property, equipment, and improvements are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the numeratorrelated asset. The estimated useful lives of assets are as follows:

Computers, office equipment and hardware3 – 5 years
Furniture and fixtures7 years
Machinery and equipment7 years
Leasehold improvementsShorter of the lease term (including estimated renewals) or the estimated useful lives of the improvement

Maintenance and denominator usedrepairs are charged to compute basicexpense as incurred, and diluted netimprovements are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss per share for each classis reflected in the accompanying statements of common stock: operations in the period realized.

Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

  As of
December 31,
2023
  As of
December 31,
2022
 
Accrued bonuses $-  $86,120 
Accrued legal fees  237,839   558,860 
Accrued professional fees  143,900   107,022 
Other accrued expenses  1,595,073   10,117 
Total accrued liabilities $1,976,812  $762,119 

     

For the period from

 
  For the year ended  June 24, 2020 (inception) to 
  December 31, 2021  December 31, 2020 
  Redeemable
common stock
  Non-
redeemable
common stock
  Redeemable
common
stock
  Non-
redeemable
common stock
 
Basic and diluted net loss per share:            
Numerator:            
Allocation of net loss $(292,326) $(182,259) $        —  $(4,713)
                 
Denominator:                
Weighted-average shares outstanding including common stock subject to redemption  6,462,329   4,029,134      3,750,000 
Basic and diluted net loss per share  (0.05)  (0.05)     (0.00)


 

Leases

The Company accounts for leases under ASC 842, “Leases” (“ASC 842)”. The core principle of this standard is that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases, by recognizing in the consolidated balance sheet a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset (“ROU asset”) representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 842, leases are classified as finance or operating leases, and both types of leases are recognized on the consolidated balance sheet.

Certain lease arrangements may contain renewal options. Renewal options are included in the expected lease term only if they are reasonably certain of being exercised by the Company.

The Company elected the practical expedient to not separate non-lease components from lease components for real-estate lease arrangements. The Company combines the lease and non-lease component into a single accounting unit and accounts for the unit under ASC 842 where lease and non-lease services are included in the classification of the lease and the calculation of the right-of-use asset and lease liability. In addition, the Company has elected the practical expedient to not apply lease recognition requirements to leases with a term of one year or less. Under this expedient, lease costs are not capitalized; rather, are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company’s leases do not contain residual value guarantees or material restrictions or covenants.

The Company uses either the rate implicit in the lease, if readily determinable, or the Company’s incremental borrowing rate for a period comparable to the lease term in order to calculate the net present value of the lease liability. The incremental borrowing rate represents the rate that would approximate the rate to borrow funds on a collateralized basis over a similar term and in a similar economic environment.

Impairment of Intangible Assets

The Company’s intangible asset consists of its intellectual property and patented technology and is considered an indefinite-lived intangible and is not subject to amortization. As of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the gross and carrying amount of this intangible asset was $1,925,151. 

A qualitative assessment of indefinite-lived intangible assets is performed in order to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. In performing this analysis, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions are considered in addition to current and forecasted financial performance, entity-specific events and changes in the composition or carrying amount of net assets under the quantitative analysis, intellectual property and patents are tested.

During the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company did not record any impairment charges.

Impairment of Long-Term Assets

The Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment exist. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the estimated separately identifiable, undiscounted cash flows from such asset are less than the carrying value of the asset. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived asset. Fair value is determined primarily using the estimated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. During the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company did not record any impairment charges.


Income Taxes

Equity-Based Compensation

The Company applies ASC 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”), in accounting for its share-based compensation arrangements.

Unit-Based Compensation

Service-based units compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the equity instruments awarded and is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, or the requisite service period, which is usually the vesting period. Performance-based unit compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the equity instruments awarded and is expensed over the requisite service period, based on the probability of achieving the performance goal, with changes in expectations recognized as an adjustment to earnings in the period of the change. If the performance goal is not met, no unit-based compensation expense is recognized and any previously recognized unit-based compensation expense is reversed. Forfeitures of service-based and performance-based units are recognized upon the time of occurrence.

2023 Equity-Based Awards

In March 2023, the Company authorized and approved the Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. 2023 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2023 Plan”) which authorizes 4,727,112 shares. On April 25, 2023, the Company granted stock options to certain employees and officers and RSUs to non-employee directors, consistent with the terms of the 2023 Plan. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model and the fair value of RSUs granted were determined by the value of the stock price on the date of the award subject to a discount for lack of marketability.

Equity-based compensation is measured using a fair value-based method for all equity-based awards. The cost of awarded equity instruments is recognized based on each instrument’s grant-date fair value over the period during which the grantee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The determination of fair value requires significant judgment and the use of estimates, particularly with regard to Black-Scholes assumptions such as stock price volatility and expected option term. Equity-based compensation is recorded as a general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company estimates the expected term of options granted based on peer benchmarking and expectations. The Company uses U.S. Treasury yield curve rates for the risk-free interest rate in the option valuation model with maturities similar to the expected term of the options. Volatility is determined by reference to the actual volatility of several publicly traded peer companies that are similar to the Company in its industry sector. The Company does not anticipate paying cash dividends and therefore use an expected dividend yield of zero in the option valuation model. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur. The Company assesses whether a discount for lack of marketability is applied based on certain liquidity factors. All equity-based payment awards subject to graded vesting based only on a service condition are amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods.

There is substantial judgment in selecting the assumptions used to determine the fair value of such equity awards and other companies could use similar market inputs and experience and arrive at different conclusions. See Note 7 for further information.

Contingent Consideration

Holdings had an arrangement payable to the Company’s CEO and a consultant whereby a contingent payment could become payable in the event that certain return on investment hurdles were met within 5 years of the closing date of the Primus asset purchase. On August 5, 2022, Holdings entered into an agreement with the Company’s management and CEO whereby, if the Business Combination reaches closing, the contingent consideration will be forfeited.


As of December 31, 2022, the Company remeasured the liability of this arrangement, and reassessed the probability of the completion of the Business Combination and reversed $7,551,000 of the accrued expense through earnings resulting in a contingent consideration liability of $1,299,000.

The Business Combination closed on February 15, 2023, and therefore the contingent consideration arrangement was terminated and no payments were made. Thus, the remaining $1,299,000 of accrued contingent consideration was reversed through earnings for the year ended December 31, 2023. See Note 10 for further information.

Deferred Transaction Costs

Deferred transaction costs are expenses directly related to the business combination with the SPAC. These costs consist primarily of legal and accounting fees that the Company capitalized. The deferred transaction costs were offset against the business combination proceeds and were reclassified to additional paid-in capital in the period of the completion of the business combination. As of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, deferred transaction costs were $0 and $3,258,880, respectively.

Income Taxes

The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under ASC 740, “Income Taxes.” Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the consolidated financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. There were no unrecognized tax benefits and no amounts accrued for interest and penalties as of December 31, 20212023 and December 31, 2020.2022. The Company is currently not aware of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviation from its position. The Company is subject to income tax examinations by major taxing authorities since inception.

Recent Accounting Standards

In November 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures”.  ASU 2023-07 enhances segment reporting under Topic 280 by expanding the breadth and frequency of segment disclosures.  ASU 2023-07 requires disclosure of significant expenses that are regularly provided to an entity’s CODM and included in the reported measure(s) of a segment’s profit or loss. When applying this disclosure requirement, an entity identifies the segment expenses that are regularly provided to the CODM or easily computable from information that is regularly provided to the CODM.   Entities are also required to disclose other segment items, i.e., the difference between reported segment revenue less the significant segment expenses and the reported measure(s) of a segment’s profit or loss. ASU 2023-07 also clarifies that single reportable segment entities are subject to Topic 280 in its entirety. ASU 2023-07 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024.  The amendments in ASU 2023-07 should be adopted retrospectively unless impracticable.  Early adoption is permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2023-07 will have on its consolidated financial statements. 


 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2020-06, Debt —debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging —Contracts in Entity’ Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’ Own Equity (“ASU 2020-06”), which simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. The ASU also removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity-linked contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception, and it simplifies the diluted earnings per share calculation in certain areas. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2021,December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2021-04, Earnings Per Share2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 260), Debt—Modifications740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures”.  ASU 2023-09 requires public entities, on an annual basis, to provide:  a tabular rate reconciliation (using both percentages and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchangesreporting currency amounts) of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options (a consensus(1) the reported income tax expense (or benefit) from continuing operations, to (2) the product of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This guidance clarifies certain aspectsincome (or loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and the applicable statutory federal (national) income tax rate of the current guidancejurisdiction (country) of domicile using specific categories, and separate disclosure for any reconciling items within certain categories that are equal to promote consistency amongor greater than a specified quantitative threshold. For each annual period presented, ASU 2023-09 also requires all reporting entities to disclose the year-to-date amount of income taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated by federal (national), state, and foreign. It also requires additional disaggregated information on income taxes paid (net of refunds received) to an issuer’s accounting for modificationsindividual jurisdiction equal to or exchangesgreater than 5% of freestanding equity-classified written call options (for example, warrants) that remain equity classified after modification or exchange. The amendments in this update aretotal income taxes paid (net of refunds received). ASU 2023-09 is effective for allpublic entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years.2024. ASU 2023-09 is to be applied on a prospective basis with the option to apply the standard retrospectively.  Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period.permitted.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of thethat ASU 2023-09 will have on its consolidated financial position, resultsstatements. 

The Company considers the applicability and impact of operations or cash flows. 

The Company’s management does not believe that anyall ASUs issued by the FASB. There are no other recentlyaccounting pronouncements which have been issued but are not yet effective accounting standards if currently adoptedthat would have a material effectimpact on the accompanyingconsolidated financial statement.statements when adopted.  

Note 3 — Initial Public OfferingNOTE 4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

ASC 850, “Related Party Disclosures” (“ASC 850”) provides guidance for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. On August 17, 2021,February 15, 2023, the Company consummated its IPO of 15,000,000 unitsentered into a new promissory note with the Sponsor totaling $409,612 (the “Units”“New Promissory Note”). Each Unit consistsThe New Promissory Note canceled and superseded all prior promissory notes. The New Promissory note was non-interest bearing and the entire principal balance of onethe New Promissory Note was payable on or before February 15, 2024 in cash or shares at the Company’s election. On February 15, 2024, the Company settled the New Promissory Note through the issuance of its Class A common stock of the Company, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Class A common stock”), and three-quarters of one redeemable warrant of the Company (“Warrant”), each whole Warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase one Class A common stock for $11.50 per share. The Units were soldshares at a conversion price of $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceedsshare.  As a result, the Company issued 40,961 common shares and recorded an increase to additional paid-in capital of $409,608.

The Company has a related party relationship with Holdings whereby Holdings holds a majority ownership in the Company via voting shares and has control of the Board of Directors. Further, Holdings possesses 3,500,000 earn out shares.

NOTE 5. LEASES

The Company determines if an arrangement is, or contains, a lease at contract inception based on whether that contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset in exchange for consideration for a period of time. Leases are classified as either finance or operating leases where the Company is lessee. This classification dictates whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. For all lease arrangements with a term of greater than 12 months, the Company presents at the commencement date: a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term.

The Company leases office space and other office equipment under operating lease arrangements with initial terms greater than twelve months. The office lease in Hillsborough, New Jersey was extended until 2025. In August 2023, the Company entered into a 40-month office lease in Houston, Texas commencing in November 2023. Office space is leased to provide adequate workspace for all employees.

In October 2022, the Company entered into a 25-year land lease in Maricopa, Arizona with the intent of building a biofuel processing facility. The commencement date of the lease was in February 2023 as control of the identified asset did not transfer to the Company of $150,000,000. The warrants will become exercisable on the later of 30 days after the completion of the initial Business Combination or 12 months from the closing of the IPO, and will expire five years after the completion of the initial Business Combination or earlier upon redemption or liquidation. 

The underwriters had a 45-day option from theeffective date of the Company’s IPO (August 17, 2021)lease. As such, the Company did not record a ROU asset nor a lease liability as of December 31, 2022, specific to purchase up to an additional 2,250,000 Units to cover over-allotments.the land lease. On August 19, 2021, the over-allotments were exercised in full, at $10.00 per Unit, generating additional proceeds of $22,500,000.

Note 4 — Private Placement

Simultaneously withcommencement date, the closingpresent value of the IPO,minimum lease payments exceeded the Company’s Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 4,500,000 warrants at a price of $1.00 per warrant, for an aggregate purchase price of $4,500,000, the Company’s underwriters purchased an aggregate of 1,500,000 warrants at a price of $1.00 per whole warrant (for an aggregate purchase price of $1,500,000) in a private placement.

On August 19, 2021, simultaneously with the closing of the over-allotments, the Sponsor purchased an additional 450,000 Private Placement Warrants, and the underwriters purchased an additional 225,000 Private Placement Warrants, at $1.00 per warrant, generating gross proceeds to the Company of $675,000.

The Private Placement Warrants are identical to the warrants sold as part of the Units in the IPO. The Sponsor and the underwriters have agreed, subject to certain limited exceptions, that the Private Placement Warrants will not be transferred, assigned or sold until 30 days after the completion of the Company’s initial Business Combination and that they will be entitled to certain registration rights.


Note 5 — Related Party Transactions

Founder Shares

On December 31, 2020, the Sponsor paid $25,000, or approximately $0.006 per share, to cover certain offering costs in consideration for 4,312,500 Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 (the “Founder Shares”). Up to 562,500 Founder Shares were subject to forfeiture by the Sponsor depending on the extent to which the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised. On August 19, 2021, the underwriters exercised the over-allotment option in full. As a result, these 562,500 founder shares are no longer subject to forfeiture. 

Additionally, upon consummation of the IPO, the Sponsor sold 75,000 Founder Shares to each of the 11 Anchor Investors that purchased at least 9.9% of the units sold in the IPO, at their original purchase price of approximately $0.0058 per share. The aggregate fair value of these founder shares attributable to anchor investors is $6,270,000, or $7.60 per share.the land, and, accordingly, the lease was classified as a finance lease.

On August 31, 2023, the Company terminated the land lease in Maricopa, Arizona. In connection with the termination, the Company incurred a termination fee of three months’ base rent. The Company allocated $6,265,215, the excess of the fair value over the gross proceeds from these Anchor Investors, among Class A common stock, Public Warrants and Private Placement Warrants.

The initial stockholders and the Anchor Investors have agreed not to transfer, assign or sell any of their Founder Shares and any Class A common stock issuable upon conversion thereof until the earlier to occur of: (A) sixtermination was effective four months after the completiontermination notice; thus, the Company had a continued right-of-use and obligation to make rental payments for use of the initial Business Combination or (B)land through December 31, 2023. The Company accounted for the termination with a continued right-of-use as a lease modification resulting in a reclassification of the lease from finance to operating as of the lease modification date. Accordingly, the Company incurred finance lease costs up to the modification date and operating lease costs subsequent to the initial Business Combination, (x) ifmodification until lease termination. The Company exited the last sale price of the Company’s Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 75 days after the initial Business Combination, or (y) the date on which the Company completes a liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of its stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property (the “Lock-up” ). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if (1) the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock capitalizations, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 75 days after the initial Business Combination, or (2) the Company completes a liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of its stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property, the Founder Shares will be released from the Lock-up.

Promissory Note — Related Party

On December 31, 2020, the Sponsor agreed to loan the Company up to $500,000 to be used for a portion of the expenses of the IPO. These loans were non-interest bearing, unsecured and were due at the earlier of September 30, 2021 or the closing of the IPO. Aslease as of December 31, 2020, the Company borrowed $88,333 under the promissory note and the loan was fully repaid upon the closing of the IPO out of the offering proceeds. As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding promissory note balance was $0.

Working Capital Loans2023.

In addition, in order to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended Business Combination, on November 11, 2021 the Sponsor signed a commitment letter to provide loans of up to an aggregate of $1,500,000 to the Company (“Working Capital Loans”). This commitment extends through August 17, 2022. These loans will be non-interest bearing, unsecured and will be repaid upon the consummation of a Business Combination. In the event that the initial Business Combination does not close, the Company may use a portion of the working capital held outside the Trust Account to repay the Working Capital Loans but no proceeds from the Trust Account would be used to repay the Working Capital Loans. Up to $1,500,000 of such Working Capital Loans may be convertible into Private Placement Warrants at a price of $1.00 per warrant at the option of the lender. Such warrants would be identical to the Private Placement Warrants. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company had no borrowings under the Working Capital Loans.

Note 6 — Commitments and Contingencies

Registration Rights

The holders of the Founder Shares, the Class A representative shares, Private Placement Warrants and warrants that may be issued upon conversion of Working Capital Loans (and any shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Private Placement Warrants and warrants that may be issued upon conversion of Working Capital Loans and upon conversion of the Founder Shares) are entitled to registration rights pursuant to a registration rights agreement signed on the IPO closing date of the IPO, requiring the Company to use its best efforts to register such securities for resale (in the case of the Founder Shares, only after conversion to the Company’s Class A common stock). The holders of the majority of these securities are entitled to make up to three demands, excluding short form demands, that the Company registers such securities. In addition, the holders have certain “piggy-back” registration rights with respect to registration statements filed subsequent to the completion of the initial Business Combination and rights to require the Company to register for resale such securities pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act. However, the registration rights agreement provides that the Company will not permit any registration statement filed under the Securities Act to become effective until termination of the applicable lock-up period, which occurs (i) in the case of the Founder Shares, on the earlier of (A) six months after the completion of the initial Business Combination or (B) subsequent to the initial Business Combination, (x) if the last sale price of our Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 75 days after the initial Business Combination, or (y) the date on which the Company completes a liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange, reorganization or other similar transaction that results in all of the Company’s stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property and (ii) in the case of the Private Placement Warrants and the respective Class A common stock underlying such warrants, 30 days after the completion of the initial Business Combination. The Company will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.


 

Lease costs for the Company’s operating and finance leases are presented below.

Lease Cost Statements of Operations Classification For the
Year Ended
December 31,
2023
  For the
Year Ended
December 31,
2022
 
Amortization of finance lease right-of-use asset General and administrative expense $127,617  $- 
Interest on finance lease liability Interest expense  236,699   - 
Total finance lease cost    364,316   - 
           
Operating lease cost General and administrative expense  431,245   237,850 
Variable lease cost General and administrative expense  151,731   155,218 
Total lease cost   $947,292  $393,068 

Maturities of the Company’s operating and finance leases as of December 31, 2023 are presented below.

  As of December 31, 2023 
Maturity of lease liabilities Operating  Finance 
2024 $324,789  $    - 
2025  162,409   - 
2026  69,531   - 
2027  11,822   - 
Thereafter  -   - 
Total future minimum lease payments  568,551   - 
Less: interest  (39,009)  - 
Present value of lease liabilities $529,542  $- 

Supplemental information related to the Company’s operating and finance lease arrangements was as follows:

  As of  As of 
Operating lease - supplemental information December 31,
2023
  December 31,
2022
 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease $524,813  $323,170 
Remaining lease term - operating lease  23 months   16 months 
Discount rate - operating lease  7.50%  7.50%

Underwriters AgreementNOTE 6. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Major classes of property, plant, and equipment are as follows:

  As of
December 31,
2023
  As of
December 31,
2022
 
Computers, office equipment and hardware $16,956  $11,461 
Furniture and fixtures  47,256   1,914 
Machinery and equipment  43,799   36,048 
         
Property, plant, and equipment  108,011   49,423 
Less: accumulated depreciation  45,506   42,009 
         
Property, plant and equipment, net $62,505  $7,414 

Depreciation expense was $3,497 and $10,034 for the year ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Depreciation expense of $1,662 and $1,835 is included in general and administrative and research and development expense, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2023. Depreciation expense of $1,355 and $8,679 is included in general and administrative and research and development expense, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2022.


The Company granted the underwriters a 45-day option from the date

NOTE 7 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Earn-out Consideration

Earnout shares potentially issuable as part of the IPOBusiness Combination are recorded within stockholder’s equity as the instruments are deemed to purchase upbe indexed to an additional 2,250,000 unitsthe Company’s common stock and meet the equity classification criteria under ASC 815-40-25. Earnout shares contain market conditions for vesting and were awarded to cover over-allotments, if any. On August 19, 2021,eligible shareholders, as described further below, and not to current employees.

As consideration for the over-allotments were exercisedcontribution of the equity interests in full.

SimultaneouslyIntermediate, Holdings received earnout consideration (“Holdings earnout”) of 3,500,000 shares of Class C common stock and a corresponding number of Class C OpCo Units subject to vesting with the closingachievement of separate market conditions. One half of the IPO andHoldings earnout shares will meet the over-allotment,market condition when the underwriters were paid an underwriting discount of two percent (2%volume-weighted average share price (“VWAP”) of the gross proceeds of the IPO and the over-allotment, or $3,450,000. Additionally, the underwriters will be entitled to a deferred underwriting discount of 3.5% of the gross proceeds of the IPO and the over-allotment upon the completion of the Company’s initial Business Combination.

Representative Shares

Simultaneously with the closing of the IPO, the Company issued to Imperial Capital LLC and/or its designees, 165,000 shares of Class A Common Stock (the “Representative Shares”). On August 19, 2021, the over-allotments were exercised in full. The Company issued additional 24,750 Representative Sharesstock is greater than or equal to Imperial Capital LLC and/or its designees. The aggregate fair value$15.00 for any 20 trading days within any period of 30 consecutive trading days within five years of the Representative shares was $1,442,100 or $7.60 per share and recorded as offering costs, which was treated as transaction cost of offering.

Imperial Capital LLC has agreed not to transfer, assign or sell any such shares of common stock untilclosing date. The second half will vest when the completion of an initial business combination. In addition, Imperial Capital LLC has agreed (i) to waive its redemption rights with respect to such shares of common stock in connection with the completion of our initial business combination; and (ii) to waive its rights to liquidating distributions from the trust account with respect to such shares of common stock if the Company fails to complete an initial business combination within the Combination Period (or up to 18 months following extensions).

The representative shares may be deemed compensation by FINRA and are therefore subject to a lock-up for a period of 180 days immediately following the commencement of salesVWAP of the registration statement of which the IPO forms a part pursuant to Rule 5110(e)(1) of FINRA’s NASD Conduct Rules. Pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110(e)(1), these securities may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated or the subject of any hedging, short sale, derivative, put or call transaction that would result in the economic disposition of the securities by any person for a period of 180 days immediately following the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, nor may they be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated for a period of 180 days immediately following the commencement of sales of the IPO except to any underwriter and selected dealer participating in the offering and their bona fide officers or partners, registered persons or affiliates or as otherwise permitted under Rule 5110(e)(2).

Note 7 — Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred stock — The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 preferred stock with a par value of $0.0001 and with such designations, voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Company’s board of directors. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, there was no preferred stock issued or outstanding.

Class A commonCommon stock  The Company is authorizedgreater than or equal to issue 200,000,000$18.00 over the same measurement period.

Additionally, the Sponsor received earnout consideration (“Sponsor earnout”) of 3,234,375 shares of Class A common stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share. At December 31, 2021, there were 189,750 Class A common stocks issued or outstanding excluding 17,250,000 Class A stock subject to redemption. At December 31, 2020, there was no Class A common stock issued or outstanding.

Class B common stock — The Company is authorized to issue 20,000,000 shares of Class B common stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share. Holders are entitled to one vote for each share of Class B common stock. At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, there were 4,312,500 shares of Class B common stock issued and outstanding. Of the 4,312,500 shares of Class B common stock, an aggregate of up to 562,500 shares were subject to forfeiture which will no longer be subject to forfeiture with the Company for no consideration to the extent that the underwriters’ over-allotment option is not exercised in full or in part, so that the initial stockholders will collectively own 20%achievement of separate market conditions (the “Sponsor Shares”). One half of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stocks after the IPO. On August 19, 2021, the over-allotments were exercised in full, hence the 562,500 Founder Shares wereSponsor earnout will no longer be subject to forfeiture.

Holdersforfeiture if the VWAP of Class A common stock and holdersis greater than or equal to $15.00 for any 20 trading days within any period of 30 consecutive trading days within five years of the closing date. The second half will no longer be subject to forfeiture when the VWAP of the Class BA common stock is greater than or equal to $18.00 over the same measurement period.

Notwithstanding the forgoing, the Holdings earnout and Sponsor earnout shares will vote togethervest in the event of a sale of the Company at a price that is equal to or greater than the applicable trigger price payable to the buyer of the Company. The earn out consideration was issued in connection with the Business Combination on February 15, 2023. Holdings earn out shares are neither issued nor outstanding as of December 31, 2023 as the performance requirements for vesting were not achieved. All Sponsor Shares granted in connection with the Business Combination are issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2023. Sponsor Shares subject to forfeiture pursuant to the above terms that do not vest in accordance with such terms shall be forfeited.

The grant-date fair value of the Earnout Shares attributable to Holdings and the Sponsor, using a single classMonte Carlo simulation model, was $10,594,000, and $5,791,677, respectively. The following table provides a summary of key inputs utilized in the valuation of the Earnout Shares on all matters submittedFebruary 15, 2023:

InputsAs of
February 15,
2023
Expected volatility50.00%
Expected dividends0%
Remaining expected term (in years)5.0 years
Risk-free rate4.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)14.7%
Payment Probability12.6% to 18.3%
based on triggering event

The earnout arrangements are akin to a votedistribution to our shareholders, similar to the declaration of a pro rata dividend, and the fair value of the Company’s stockholders except as required by law. Unless specified inshares are a reduction to retained earnings.

Based on the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation or bylaws, or as required by applicable provisions of the DGCL or applicable stock exchange rules, the affirmative vote of a majority of the Company’s shares ofClass A common stock that are voted is required to approve any such matter voted on by its stockholders.trading price the market conditions were not met and no Earnout Shares vested as of December 31, 2023.


 

Share-based Compensation

Compensation expense related to share-based compensation arrangements is included within general and administrative expenses. The Class B common stock will automatically converttotal compensation expense incurred related to the Company’s equity-based compensation plans was $2,901,569 and $1,420,532 for the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. As a taxable event has not occurred, there were no income tax benefits recorded for these awards for the year ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

Incentive Units

Prior to closing of the Business Combination, certain subsidiaries of the Company, including Intermediate, were wholly owned subsidiaries of Holdings. Holdings, which was outside of the Business Combination perimeter, had entered into Classseveral compensation related arrangements with management of Intermediate. Compensation costs associated with those arrangements were allocated by Holdings to Intermediate as the employees were rendering services to Intermediate. However, the ultimate contractual obligation related to these awards, including any future settlement, rested and continues to rest with Holdings. 

The Holdings equity compensation instruments consisted of 1,000 authorized and issuable Series A common stockIncentive Units and 1,000 authorized and issuable Founder Incentive Units. Series A Incentive Units refers to 800 incentive units issued by Holdings on August 7, 2020 to certain members of management of Intermediate in compensation for their services. Founder Incentive Units refers to 1,000 incentive units issued by Holdings on August 7, 2020 to certain members of management of Intermediate in compensation for their services. Both Series A Incentive Unit holders and Founders Incentive Unit holders participated in earnings and distributions after a specified return to the Series A Preferred Unit holders. The Series A Incentive Units were deemed to be service-based awards under ASC 718 due to vesting conditions. Vesting of the service-based units was to occur in equal installments of 25% on each of the first through fourth anniversaries of the August 7, 2020 grant date subject to the participant’s continuous service through such dates. The Founder Incentive Units were deemed to be performance-based based units as no vesting conditions existed.

The Company classified these units as equity awards and measured their fair value at the grant date. The fair value of each award was estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes option valuation model that used the assumptions noted below and other valuation techniques. Expected volatility was based on historical volatility for guideline public companies that operate in the Company’s industry. The expected term of awards granted represents management’s estimate for the number of years until a liquidity event as of the grant date. The risk-free rate for the period of the expected term was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. In addition, management considered the initial Business Combinationdistribution priority schedule or “waterfall calculation” in its estimation process.

There were 800 Series A Incentive Units granted by Holdings in August of 2020 and 400 were unvested as of December 31, 2022. As the award recipients resided on a one-for-one basis, subjectsubsidiaries of Intermediate and provided service to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like, and subjectCompany, the Company recognized $1,420,532 of compensation expense related to further adjustment as provided herein. In the case that additional shares of Class A common stock or equity-linked securities are issued or deemedawards during the year ended December 31, 2022.

There were 1,000 Founder Incentive Units issued in excessAugust of 2020 by Holdings and 1,000 were unvested as of December 31, 2022. No compensation expense was recorded related to these awards during the year ended December 31, 2022 as performance conditions had not, and were unlikely to be met.

On August 5, 2022, certain amendments to the existing Series A Incentive Units and Founder Incentive Units were made whereby all outstanding unvested Series A Incentive Units and Founders Incentive Units would become fully vested upon completion of the amounts offeredBusiness Combination. Additionally, as part of the amendment to these agreements, the priority of distributions under the Series A Incentive Units and Founders Incentive Units was also revised such that participants receive 10% of distributions after a specified return to Holdings’ Series A Incentive Unit holders (instead of 20%). The modifications to the Series A Incentive Units and Founders Units did not result in any incremental unit-based compensation expense in connection with the IPO and related toAugust 2022 modification.

In connection with the closing of the Business Combination, including pursuant toand as a specified future issuance,result of the ratio at which shares of Class B common stock shall convert into shares of Class A common stock will be adjusted (unless the holders of a majorityAugust 5, 2022 amendments, all of the outstanding and unvested Series A Incentive Units and Founder Incentive Units became fully vested. As such, the Company accelerated the remaining service-based share-based payment expense related to these awards of $2,146,792. The accelerated share-based payment expense was included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023. Performance conditions for the performance-based Founder Incentive Units had not and were unlikely to be met as of December 31, 2023. As such, no share-based compensation cost was recorded for these units.


2023 Equity Awards

On April 25, 2023, consistent with the terms of the 2023 Plan, the Company granted stock options to certain employees and officers and RSUs to non-employee directors. In addition to stock options and RSUs, the 2023 Plan authorizes for the future potential grant of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance awards, stock awards, dividend equivalents, other stock-based awards, cash awards and substitute awards to certain employees (including executive officers), consultants and non-employee directors, and is intended to align the interests of the Company’s service providers with those of the stockholders.

Stock Options

Stock options represent the contingent right of award holders to purchase shares of Class Bthe Company’s common stock agreeat a stated price for a limited time. The stock options granted in 2023 have an exercise price of $11.00 per share and will expire 7 years from the date of grant. Stock options granted vest at a rate of 25% on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant subject to waivecontinued service through the vesting dates.

The Company estimates the fair value of stock options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model and the following underlying assumptions. Expected volatility was based on historical volatility for public company peers that operate in the Company’s industry. The expected term of awards granted represents management’s estimate for the number of years until a liquidity event as of the grant date. The risk-free rate for the period of the expected term was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The fair value of stock options granted for the year ended December 31, 2023 were determined using the following assumptions as of the grant date:

Risk-free interest rate3.4%
Expected term7 years
Volatility48.2%
Dividend yieldZero
Discount for lack of marketability10%

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $1.50 per share.

The table below presents activity related to stock options awarded for the year ended December 31, 2023:

  Number of
options
  Weighted
average
exercise
price per
share
 
  Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life (years)
 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2022  -   -   - 
Granted  1,236,016  $11.00   7.0 
Exercised  -   -   - 
Forfeited / expired  -   -   - 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2023  1,236,016  $11.00   6.3 
Vested as of December 31, 2023  -   -   - 
Unvested as of December 31, 2023  1,236,016  $11.00   6.3 
Exercisable as of December 31, 2023  -   -   - 

Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options was $334,832 for the year ended December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2023, unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was $1,519,191. The remaining compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.3 years. The weighted average remaining contractual term for all options outstanding at December 31, 2023 is 6.3 years. There were no vested stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2023, thus, there was no cash received for the exercise of stock options for the year ended December 31, 2023.


Restricted Stock Units

In March 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors approved 141,656 non-employee time-based RSU awards. RSUs represent an unsecured right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock equal to the value of the common stock on the settlement date. RSUs have a zero-exercise price and vest over time in whole after the first anniversary of the date of grant subject to continuous service through the vesting date.

The fair value of RSUs granted in 2023 were determined by the value of the stock price on the date of the award subject to a discount for lack of marketability of 13% for a per unit value of $4.35. The discount due to lack of marketability was applied because of the limited trading activity of the Company’s public equity.

RSU activity for the year ended December 31, 2023 is as follows:

Time-
based
restricted
stock units
Unvested, December 31, 2022-
Granted in the year ended December 31, 2023141,656
Vested-
Forfeited-
Unvested December 31, 2023141,656

The March 2023 RSU awards had an aggregate fair value of $616,204 as of the grant date. RSU compensation expense was $419,945 for the year ended December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2023, unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs was $196,259. The remaining compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.32 years.

As of December 31, 2023, the Company had not granted RSUs which vest based on the achievement of certain market or performance metrics.

Recast of Intermediate Equity

The Business Combination was structured as a reverse merger and recapitalization which results in a common control arrangement where Holdings, the party that controls the reporting entity prior to the Business Combination, continues to control the Company immediately after the Business Combination. As such, adjustment with respectthere is not a new basis of accounting and the financial statements of the combined company represent a continuation of the financial statements of Intermediate where assets and liabilities of Intermediate continue to any such issuance or deemed issuance, includingbe reported at historical value. However, the reverse recapitalization requires a specified future issuance) so thatrecast of Intermediate’s equity and earnings per share and is adjusted to reflect the par value of the outstanding capital stock of CENAQ. For periods before the reverse recapitalization, shareholders’ equity of Intermediate is presented based on the historical equity of Intermediate restated using the exchange ratio to reflect the equity structure of CENAQ.

Management evaluated the impact of the number of shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of allissued by CENAQ to affect the Business Combination in exchange for the shares of Class B common stock will equal,Intermediate (“the exchange ratio”) and concluded the recast of historical equity based on the exchange ratio did not result in a significant impact to historical equity.

NOTE 8 – WARRANTS

There were 15,383,263 warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2023. Warrants were exercised on various dates during the aggregate, on an as-converted basis, 20% of the sum ofyear ended December 31, 2023 whereby the total number of all shares of common stock outstanding upon completion of the IPO plus all shares ofwarrants exercised was 29,216, resulting in 29,216 Class A common stock and equity-linked securities issued or deemed issued in connection withshares issued. The Company received cash of $335,984 related to the Business Combination (excluding any shares or equity-linked securities issued, or to be issued, to any seller inwarrant exercises during the Business Combination). Holders of Founder Shares may also elect to convert their shares of Class B common stock into an equal number of shares of Class A common stock, subject to adjustment as provided above, at any time.year ended December 31, 2023.

Warrants — There are 19,612,500 warrants currently outstanding, including 12,937,500 public warrants and 6,675,000 Private Placement Warrants. Each warrant entitles the registered holder to purchase one share of Class A common stock at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment as discussed below, at any time commencing 30 days after the completion of our initial business combination. However, no warrants will be exercisable for cash unless we havethere is an effective and current registration statement covering the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and a current prospectus relating to such shares of Class A common stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a registration statement covering the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the public warrants is not effective within a specified period following the consummation of our initial business combination, warrant holders may, until such time as there is an effective registration statement and during any period when we shall have failed to maintain an effective registration statement, exercise warrants on a cashless basis pursuant to the exemption provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act, provided that such exemption is available. If that exemption, or another exemption, is not available, holders will not be able to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis. In the event of such cashless exercise, each holder would pay the exercise price by surrendering the warrants for that number of shares of Class A common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of shares of Class A common stock underlying the warrants, multiplied by the difference between the exercise price of the warrants and the “fair market value” (defined below) by (y) the fair market value. The “fair market value” for this purpose will mean the average reported last sale price of the shares of Class A common stock for the 5 trading days ending on the trading day prior to the date of exercise. The warrants will expire on the fifth anniversary of our completion of an initial business combination, at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, or earlier upon redemption or liquidation.

The Private Placement Warrants, as well as any warrants underlying additional units we issue to our sponsor, officers, directors, initial stockholders or their affiliates in payment of working capital loans made to us, will be identical to the warrants underlying the units being offered by this prospectus.


 

We

The Company may call the warrants for redemption, in whole and not in part, at a price of $0.01 per warrant:

at any time after the warrants become exercisable;

upon not less than 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption to each warrant holder;

if, and only if, the reported last sale price of the shares of Class A common stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations and recapitalizations), for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading30-trading day period commencing at any time after the warrants become exercisable and ending on the third business day prior to the notice of redemption to warrant holders; and

if, and only if, there is a current registration statement in effect with respect to the shares of Class A common stock underlying such warrants.

If and when the warrants become redeemable by the Company, the Company may exercise its redemption right even if it is unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws.

NOTE 9 – INCOME TAX

As of December 31, 2023, Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. holds 29.38% of the economic interest in OpCo, which is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, OpCo generally is not subject to U.S. federal income tax under current U.S. tax laws as its net taxable income (loss) and any related tax credits are passed through to its members and included in their tax returns, even though such net taxable income (loss) or tax credits may not have actually been distributed. Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. is subject to U.S. federal income taxes, in addition to state and local income taxes, with respect to its distributive share of the net taxable income (loss) and any related tax credits of OpCo.

Intermediate was historically and remains a disregarded subsidiary of a partnership for U.S. Federal income tax purposes with each partner being separately taxed on its share of taxable income or loss. As a direct result of the Business Combination, OpCo became the sole member of Intermediate. As such, OpCo’s distributive share of any net taxable income or loss and any related tax credits of Intermediate are then distributed to the Company.

For the days and periods prior to the reverse recapitalization, Intermediate was a disregarded subsidiary of an entity treated as a partnership. As such, its net taxable loss and any related tax credits were allocated to its members. The period as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023 discussed below represents the period beginning January 1, 2023 and ending December 31, 2023.

Intermediate had no current or deferred income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2022 due to its disregarded entity status.

The components of income taxes are as follows:

  For The Year Ended
December 31,
 
  2023  2022 
Current:      
Federal $166,265  $        - 
State  -  $- 
Total current  166,265  $- 
Deferred:        
Federal  -   - 
State  -   - 
Total deferred  -   - 
Total Income Tax Expense $166,265  $- 

Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 consisted of $119,186 of current income taxes, and interest and penalties of $15,701 and $31,377, respectively. As a policy election, the Company records interest and penalties within income tax expense.


A reconciliation of income tax expense with amounts computed at the federal statutory tax rate is as follows:

  For the
Year Ended
December 31,
2023
 
Computed tax (21%) $(2,170,352)
Income attributable to legacy Intermediate holders  516,715 
Income tax benefit attributable to noncontrolling interests  1,112,400 
Change in valuation allowance  561,578 
Other permanent items  36,793 
Other items  109,131 
Income Tax Expense $166,265 

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Noncurrent deferred tax assets (liabilities) were as follows:

Deferred Taxes For the
Year Ended
December 31,
2023
 
Deferred Tax Liabilities:   
Total deferred tax liabilities $- 
Deferred Tax Assets:    
Start-up costs $193,765 
Stock-based compensation  46,568 
Investment in OpCo  8,168,987 
Federal NOL carryforwards  553,497 
Total deferred tax assets  8,962,817 
Valuation allowance  (8,962,817)
Total net deferred tax assets $- 
Net deferred tax asset (liability) $- 

The Private Placement Warrants,Company has assessed the realizability of the net deferred tax assets, and in that analysis, has considered the relevant positive and negative evidence available to determine whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. In making such a determination, the Company considered all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and recent results of operations. After consideration of all available evidence, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets at Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. as of the Closing Date of the Business Combination and as of December 31, 2023, which will be maintained until there is sufficient evidence to support the reversal of all or some portion of these allowances. The initial recognition of the Company’s deferred tax assets and valuation allowance in connection with the Business Combination was recorded to additional paid-in-capital on the consolidated balance sheet. As noted above, the valuation allowance completely offset the deferred tax assets of Verde Clean Fuels, Inc., which resulted in a net zero impact to the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of the Closing Date of the Business Combination.

As of December 31, 2023, the Company had a U.S. federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward totaling $553,497, which does not expire.

The Company recognizes the financial statement effects of uncertain income tax positions when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. To the extent the Company’s assessment of such tax positions changes, the change in estimate will be recorded in the period in which the determination is made. As of December 31, 2023, the Company has not recorded any uncertain tax positions, as well as any warrantsaccrued interest and penalties on the Company issuesconsolidated balance sheet.

The Company’s income tax filings will be subject to the Sponsor, officers, directors, initial stockholders or their affiliates in payment of Working Capital Loans made to theaudit by various taxing jurisdictions. The Company will monitor the status of U.S. Federal, state and local income tax returns that may be identicalsubject to audit in future periods. No U.S. Federal, state and local income tax returns are currently under examination by the public warrants underlying the Units being offered in the Initial Public Offering.respective taxing authorities.


 

Note 8 — Income Tax receivable agreement

The Company’sOn the Closing Date, in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination and as contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement, Verde Clean Fuels entered into a tax receivable agreement (the “Tax Receivable Agreement”) with Holdings (together with its permitted transferees, the “TRA Holders,” and each a “TRA Holder”) and the Agent (as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement). Pursuant to the Tax Receivable Agreement, Verde Clean Fuels is required to pay each TRA Holder 85% of the amount of net deferredcash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income and franchise tax assets arethat Verde Clean Fuels actually realizes (computed using certain simplifying assumptions) or is deemed to realize in certain circumstances in periods after the Closing as follows:

  December 31,
2021
  December 31,
2020
 
Deferred tax asset      
Organizational costs/Startup expenses $53,826  $ 
Federal Net Operating loss  41,721   990 
Total deferred tax asset  95,547   990 
Valuation allowance  (95,547)  (990)
Deferred tax asset, net of allowance $  $ 

Thea result of, as applicable to each such TRA Holder, (i) certain increases in tax basis that occur as a result of Verde Clean Fuels’ acquisition (or deemed acquisition for U.S. federal income tax provision consistspurposes) of all or a portion of such TRA Holder’s Class C OpCo Units pursuant to the exercise of the following:OpCo Exchange Right, a Mandatory Exchange or the Call Right (each as defined in the Amended and Restated LLC Agreement of OpCo) and (ii) imputed interest deemed to be paid by Verde Clean Fuels as a result of, and additional tax basis arising from, any payments Verde Clean Fuels makes under the Tax Receivable Agreement. Verde Clean Fuels will retain the benefit of the remaining 15% of these net cash savings. The Tax Receivable Agreement contains a payment cap of $50,000,000, which applies only to certain payments required to be made in connection with the occurrence of a change of control. The payment cap would not be reduced or offset by any amounts previously paid under the Tax Receivable Agreement or any amounts that are required to be paid (but have not yet been paid) for the year in which the change of control occurs or any prior years.

  December 31,
2021
  December 31,
2020
 
Federal      
Current $  $ 
Deferred  (94,557)  (990)
         
State        
Current      
Deferred      
Change in valuation allowance  94,557   990 
Income tax provision $  $ 

As of December 31, 20212023, the Company did not have a tax receivable balance.

NOTE 10 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

As of December 31, 2023, the Company had cash equivalents of $26,155,789, which consisted of funds held in a short-term money market fund and are classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.  See Note 3.

The Company measured the liability for contingent consideration as of December 31, 2022 using level 3 inputs and valued the contingent consideration at $1,299,000.

The following table provides a summary of key inputs utilized in the valuation of the contingent consideration liability as of December 31, 2022:

Inputs As of
December 31,
2022
 
Expected volatility  68.60%
Expected dividends  0%
Remaining expected term (in years)  0.09 
Risk-free rate  4.12%
Discount rate (WACC)  27.2%
Payment probability  25%
Internal rate of return hurdle  15%
Excess return allocable to contingent payment  10%
Estimated fair value of contingent consideration $1,299,000 

There was no liability for contingent consideration as of December 31, 2023 as this liability was reversed and recognized in earnings during the year ended December 31, 2023 as a result of the close of the Business Combination.

At December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2020,2022, there were no other assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as the earnout shares, public warrants, and private placement warrants are equity-classified.

NOTE 11 – LOSS PER SHARE

Loss per share

Prior to the reverse recapitalization in connection with the Business Combination, all net loss was attributable to the noncontrolling interest. For the periods prior to the Closing Date of February 15, 2023, earnings per share was not calculated because net income prior to the Business Combination was attributable entirely to Intermediate. Further, prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, the Intermediate ownership structure included equity interests held solely by Holdings. The Company had $198,672analyzed the calculation of earnings per share for comparative periods presented and $4,713, respectivelydetermined that it resulted in values that would not be meaningful to the users of U.S. federal operatingthese consolidated financial statements. Therefore, the earnings per share information has not been presented for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Basic net loss carryovers availableper share has been computed by dividing net loss attributable to offset future taxable income, which do not expire.Class A common shareholders for the period subsequent to the Business Combination by the weighted average number of Class A shares of common stock outstanding for the same period. Diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock were computed by dividing net loss attributable to Class A common shareholders by the weighted-average number of Class A shares of common stock outstanding adjusted to give effect to potentially dilutive securities.

The Company’s potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect would be to reduce the net loss per share. Therefore, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate both basic and diluted net loss per share is the same. The following table sets forth the computation of net loss used to compute basic net loss per share of Class A common stock for the year ended December 31, 2023.

In assessing


  For the
Year Ended
December 31,
2023
 
Net (loss) attributable to Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. $(2,743,588)
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding  6,140,529 
Dilutive effect of share-based awards  - 
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding  6,140,529 
Basic (loss) per share $(0.45)
Diluted (loss) per share $(0.45)

The Company’s stock options, warrants, and earnout shares could have the realizationmost significant impact on diluted shares should the instruments represent dilutive instruments. However, securities that could potentially be dilutive are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share when a loss from continuing operations exists or when the exercise price exceeds the average closing price of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely thanCompany’s common stock during the period, because their inclusion would result in an antidilutive effect on per share amounts.

The following amounts were not that some portionincluded in the calculation of allnet income per diluted share because their effects were anti-dilutive:

As of
December 31,
2023
Warrants15,383,263
Earnout shares (1)3,234,375
Convertible debt40,961
Stock options1,236,016
Time-based RSUs141,656
Total antidilutive instruments20,036,271

(1)Excludes 3,500,000 Class C earnout shares convertible into Class A common shares. Class C common stock are not participating securities; thus, the application of the two-class method is not required.

Noncontrolling Interests

Following the Business Combination, holders of Class A common stock own direct controlling interest in the results of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.combined entity, while Holdings own an economic interest in the Company, shown as noncontrolling interests (“NCI”) in stockholders’ equity in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The ultimate realizationindirect economic interests are held by Holdings in the form of deferred tax assets is dependent uponClass C OpCo units.

Following the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences representing net future deductible amounts become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. After consideration of allcompletion of the information available, management believes that significant uncertainty exists with respect to future realizationBusiness Combination, the ownership interests of the deferred tax assetsClass A common stockholders and has therefore established a full valuation allowance. For the yearNCI were 29.38% and 70.62%, respectively. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020,2023, the valuation allowance increased $94,557 and $990, respectively.

Reconciliationsownership interests of the federal income tax rateClass A common stockholders and the NCI were 29.44% and 70.56%, respectively. The change in ownership interests was due to warrant exercises that resulted in the issuance of an additional 29,216 Class A common shares. See Note 8 for further information. The NCI may further decrease according to the Company’s effective tax rate at December 31, 2021number of shares of Class C common stock and December 31, 2020Verde Clean Fuel OpCo LLC Class C units that are as follows:

  December 31,
2021
  December 31,
2020
 
Statutory federal income tax rate  21.0%  21.0%
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit  0.0%  0.0%
Permanent Book/Tax Differences  -1.08%  0.0%
Change in valuation allowance  -19.92%  -21.0%
Income tax provision  %  %

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and is subject to examination by the taxing authorities.exchanged for shares of Class A common stock.

Note 9NOTE 12 — Subsequent EventsSUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On February 6, 2024, the Company and Cottonmouth Ventures LLC, a subsidiary of Diamondback Energy (“Diamondback”), entered into a joint development agreement (“JDA”) for the proposed development, construction, and operation of a facility to produce commodity-grade gasoline using natural gas feedstock supplied from Diamondback’s operations in the Permian Basin.

Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas company headquartered in Midland, Texas, focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas.

The JDA provides a pathway forward for the parties to reach final definitive documents and Final Investment Decision (“FID"). The JDA frames the contracts contemplated to be entered into between the parties, including an operating agreement, ground lease agreement, construction agreement, license agreement and financing agreements as well as conditions precedent to close such as FID.

The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the JDA will have on its consolidated financial statements.

The Company evaluated subsequent events and transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date up to the date whichthat the consolidated financial statements were available to be issued. Based upon this review, other than as disclosed above, the Company did not identify any other subsequent events that would have required adjustment or disclosure in thethese consolidated financial statement.statements.


 

ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements Withwith Accountants Onon Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.As previously disclosed in a current report filed with the SEC on February 21, 2023, the Audit Committee of the Company approved the dismissal of Marcum LLP (“Marcum”) and approved the approved the engagement of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as its independent registered public accounting firm, effective upon February

15, 2023.

During the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, as well as the subsequent interim period through Marcum’s dismissal, (1) there were no “disagreements” (as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act, and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act) with Marcum on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosures or audited scope or procedures, which disagreements if not resolved to Marcum’s satisfaction would have caused Marcum to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its report and (2) there have been no “reportable events” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act) except as previously disclosed.

Deloitte previously served as the independent registered public accounting firm of Intermediate prior to the Business Combination. During the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, as well as the subsequent interim period through Marcum’s dismissal, neither the Company, nor anyone on the Company’s behalf consulted with Deloitte on regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction (either completed or proposed), the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, or any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement,” as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K, or a “reportable event,” as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2021.2023. Based upon their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K due solely to the remediation of material weaknessweaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting related to the Company'sCompany’s accounting for complex financial instruments, specifically common stock subject to redemptionunit-based compensation expense and over-allotment option.application of new accounting standards. As a result, we performed additional analysis as deemed necessary to ensure that our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP.U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, management believes that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual ReportForm 10-K present fairly in all material respects our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the period presented.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In designing and evaluating the disclosure Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management noted material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting related to the understatement of unit-based compensation expense, as described in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2023. The understatement of the grant date fair value was due to a revision in the underlying fair value determination, and such revision was not appropriately reflected in the financial statements. Management concluded that the grant date fair value and corresponding incremental expense should be adjusted by recognizing the additional expense in our March 31, 2022 financial statements. As part of such process, management recognizes that any controls and procedures,identified a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting related to the grant date fair value revision. Additionally, we did not maintain effective internal control regarding the date on which to apply new accounting standards based upon CENAQ’s elections made as an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act, as described in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2023, which required the Company to apply new accounting standards as if it were a public business entity. These material weaknesses have been remediated as discussed below.

Limitations of the Effectiveness of Control

A control system, no matter how well designedconceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition,system are met. Because of the designinherent limitations of disclosureany control system, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company have been detected.


Management’s Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

As required by SEC rules and proceduresregulations implementing Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting must reflectis designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the fact that there are resource constraintsreliability of financial reporting and that management is required to apply judgmentthe preparation of our consolidated financial statements for external reporting purposes in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

This Report does not include a report of management’s assessment regardingaccordance with GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(1)pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of our Company,

(2)provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors, and

(3)provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect errors or misstatements in our financial statements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2023. In making these assessments, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessments and those criteria, management determined that its internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023 were effective.

We believe the actions described in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2023, were sufficient to remediate the identified material weaknesses and strengthen our internal control over financial reporting for accounting for unit-based compensation expense and application of new accounting standards and that the material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were fully remediated as of December 31, 2023.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established byour status as an emerging growth company under the rules of the SEC for new public companies.JOBS Act.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management identified aOther than changes that have resulted from the material weakness remediation activities noted above, there has been no change in our internal control relatedover financial reporting, during the most recently completed fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to the Company's accounting for complex financial instruments. During the quarter ended September 30, 2021, management identified a material weakness inmaterially affect, our internal control relating to the classification of common stock subject to redemption. During the quarter ended December 31, 2021, management identified a material weakness in internal control relating to the over-allotment option. While we have processes to identify and appropriately apply applicable accounting requirements, we plan to enhance our system of evaluating and implementing the accounting standards that apply to ourover financial statements, including through enhanced analyses by our personnel and third-party professionals with whom we consult regarding complex accounting applications. The elements of our remediation plan can only be accomplished over time, and we can offer no assurance that these initiatives will ultimately have the intended effects.reporting.

ITEM 9B. Other Information.

None.

ITEM 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevent Inspections.

Not applicable.


 

PART III

ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Officers and Directors

Our officers and directors are as follows:

NameAgePosition
John B. Connally III75Chairman of the Board
J. Russell Porter60Chief Executive Officer and Director
Michael J. Mayell74President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
Benjamin Francisco Salinas Sada38Director
Denise DuBard64Director
Michael S. Bahorich65Director
David Bullion58Director

John B. Connally III, Chairman

Mr. Connally currently serves as our Chairman.  He has decades of experience in the formation, management and growth of exploration and production companies as well as numerous contacts within the energy and energy private equity communities. Mr. Connally has also served as chairman of the board of Texas South Energy, Inc. (OTCMKTS: TXSO) since January 2017. Mr. Connally currently serves as chairman of the Texas Lt. Governor’s Energy Advisory Board. Mr. Connally was a founding shareholder of Texas South and GulfSlope Energy, Inc., and a founding director of Nuevo Energy, Inc., Endeavor International Corp, Pure Energy Group (where he also served as chief executive officer) and Pure Gas Partners. Mr. Connally practiced corporate and securities and merger and acquisition law for the energy industry and investment banking industry as a partner at the law firm of Baker & Botts. He received both his Bachelor of Arts and JD from the University of Texas.

J. Russell Porter, CEO and Director

Our Chief Executive Officer J. Russell Porter has over 30 years of executive level experience in the oil and gas business with a strong background in property acquisition, energy finance, oil and natural gas marketing as well as conventional and unconventional resource business development. His experience has primarily been leading publicly traded upstream companies operating in the U.S. enhanced by previous work in the energy banking industry. From January 2019 to September 2020, Mr. Porter was Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Freedom Oil & Gas, Inc., an Australian listed E&P company with assets and operations in the Eagle Ford shale. Mr. Porter managed the liquidation of Freedom’s U.S. assets after the Australian parent and U.S. subsidiaries filed voluntary Chapter 11 proceedings in May 2020. From September 2000 to April 2018, Mr. Porter was Chief Operating Officer and subsequently President and Chief Executive Officer of Gastar. Gastar filed a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 31, 2018 after Mr. Porter’s departure. From April 1994 to August 2000, Mr. Porter served as Executive Vice President, along with various other leadership roles, at Forcenergy Inc. Mr. Porter holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Land Management from Louisiana State University and a M.B.A. from the Kenan-Flagler School of Business at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Michael J. Mayell, President, Chief Financial Officer and Director

Mr. Mayell currently serves as our President and Chief Financial Officer, and has over 52 years of experience in the oil and gas business with more than 38 years in top management positions of multiple E&P companies. Mr. Mayell has also served as the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Texas South Energy, Inc. (OTCMKTS: TXSO) since January 2017. Prior to joining Texas South, Mr. Mayell served as President, Chief Operating Officer and a director of The Meridian Resource Corporation which he co-founded in 1985. He served in those capacities at Meridian for over 20 years until it merged into Alta Mesa Holdings in 2010. Prior to Meridian, in 1982, Mr. Mayell founded and as served as President and CEO of Sydson Energy, Inc. which drilled and produced various properties in Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas. Sydson Energy and its affiliated companies continue to be active in 2021. Prior to his time at Meridian and Sydson, Mr. Mayell was Vice President of Engineering and Operations at Kirby Exploration Company with responsibility for all of the company’s activity in North America. Mr. Mayell began his career with Shell Oil Company in New Orleans, Louisiana with assignments in multiple engineering and operating groups both onshore and offshore South Louisiana. Mr. Mayell received his Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Clarkston University.


Benjamin Francisco Salinas Sada, Director

In December 2013, Mr. Salinas founded Typhoon Offshore, a company to provide oil and gas services to PEMEX, with an innovative business model. In October 2015, Mr. Salinas was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of TV Azteca, Mexico’s second largest television broadcasting company. Mr. Salinas is the Founder and Chairman of BTC Investments, a firm organized as a Mexico-based multi-strategy investment management fund primarily allocating venture capital investments in seed, early, and late-stage start-ups from a wide range of sectors.  Mr. Salinas holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Business Administration from the Instituto Tecnológicoy de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, one of Mexico’s most prestigious universities.

Michael S. Bahorich, Director

Mr. Bahorich has over 35 years of experience in upstream oil and gas with a background in finding and developing conventional fields and shale assets. He joined Apache in November 1996 and was a member of Apache Corporation’s senior management team from June 2000 to June 2015. From November 1981 to November 1996 he was a geophysicist, researcher and exploration manager with Amoco. Formerly, Mr. Bahorich was President of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists. Mr. Bahorich served as a director on two public boards, Energy XXI (between 2017 to 2018) and Global Geophysical Services (between 2011 to 2015), as well as two private boards, Premier Oilfield Group and SigmaCubed. Energy XXI filed for bankruptcy protection in April 2016. Global Geophysical Services filed for bankruptcy protection in March 2014 and August 2016. Mr. Bahorich holds a B.S. in Geology from the University of Missouri and an M.S. in Geophysics from Virginia Tech.

David Bullion, Director

Mr. Bullion has over 30 years of experience in upstream oil and gas. He worked at BP plc (formerly The British Petroleum Company plc and BP Amoco plc) since July 1988, first as a field petrophysics in Alaska. At BP, Mr. Bullion held multiple positions including Asset Manager GOM Deepwater from March 2001 to December 2002, Business Development Technical Manager GOM Deep Water from January 2003 to January 2004, Resource Manager for Rockies U.S.A. from February 2004 to December 2005 and managed tight gas fields. After leaving BP in July 2008, Mr. Bullion became Vice President, General Manager for Red Willow LLC leading all operations for the firm in Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and the Gulf of Mexico until his departure in May 2010. Most recently, he has been involved with multiple acquisition and divestment projects advising both buyers and sellers.  Mr. Bullion has a BS and MS in Geophysics from Texas A&M University and attended MIT Sloan School of Business Project Academy while at BP.

Denise DuBard, Director

Denise DuBard has served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Amplify Energy Corp. since August 2018, until her retirement on July 1,2021. From March 2015 until July 2018, Ms. DuBard served as Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of Contango Oil & Gas Company. Ms. DuBard also served as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of PetroPoint Energy Partners, LP from 2012 until August 2014, when the company was sold. Prior to that, Ms. DuBard served as a consultant with Axia Partners, a CPA advisory firm, providing accounting and finance related consulting services to the energy industry from December 2014 until March 2015. Ms. DuBard worked with Axia Partners as a consultant in the same capacity as mentioned above from 2009 to 2012. From 2005 to 2009 Ms. DuBard served as Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer for Rosetta Resources Inc., a public oil and gas company. Ms. DuBard started her career with Deloitte in the assurance practice and held accounting and consulting positions before 2005 at Sonat Offshore Drilling and Team, Inc. Ms. DuBard graduated with honors from Texas A&M University with a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Finance and brings over 30 years of energy experience in accounting, finance and management.


Terms of Office of Officers and Directors

As of the date of this Annual Report we have seven directors. In accordance with NASDAQ corporate governance requirements, we areGeneral Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the Company intends to file with the SEC the information required by this item not required to hold an annual meeting until one yearlater than 120 days after our firstthe end of the fiscal year end following our listing on NASDAQ.covered by this Form 10-K.

Our Board will be divided into three classes with only one classCode of directors being elected in each yearBusiness Conduct and each class (except for those directors appointed before our first annual meeting of stockholders) serving a three-year term. The term of office of the first class of directors, consisting currently of Mr. David Bullion will expire at our first annual meeting of stockholders. The term of office of the second class of directors, consisting of Benjamin Salinas, Denise DuBard and Michael Bahorich, will expire at the second annual meeting of stockholders. The term of office of the third class of directors, consisting of John B. Connally III, Michael Mayell and J. Russell Porter will expire at the third annual meeting of stockholders.Ethics

Under our amendedOur board adopted a Code of Business Conduct and restated certificateEthics on February 15, 2023 (the “Code of incorporation, holders of our founder shares will have the rightEthics”) that applies to elect all of our directors, before consummation of our initial business combination and holders of our public shares will not have the right to vote on the election of directors during such time. These provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation may only be amended if approved by holders of at least 90% of our outstanding common stock entitled to vote thereon. Subject to any other special rights applicable to the shareholders, any vacancies on our Board may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors present and voting at the meeting of our board or by a majority of the holders of our founder shares.

Our officers are appointed by the Board and serve at the discretion of the Board, rather than for specific terms of office. Our Board is authorized to appoint persons to the offices set forth in our bylaws as it deems appropriate. Our bylaws provide that our officers may consist of one or more Chief Executive Officer, a Chief Financial Officer, a Secretary and such other officers (including without limitation, a Chairman of the Board, Presidents, Vice Presidents, Partners, Managing Directors and Senior Managing Directors) and such other offices as may be determined by the Board.

Director Independence

NASDAQ listing standards require that a majority of our board of directors be independent. An “independent director” is defined generally as a person other than an officer or employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship which in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

Our Board has determined that David Bullion, Benjamin Salinas, Denise DuBard and Michael Bahorich are independent directors. Our independent directors have regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board has two standing committees: an audit committee and a compensation committee. Each committee operates under a charter that has been approved by our board and has the composition and responsibilities described below. The charter of each committee is available on our website.

Audit Committee

We established an audit committee of the Board. Denise DuBard, John Connally III and David Bullion who serve as members of our audit committee. Under NASDAQ listing standards and applicable SEC rules, we are required to have at least three members of the audit committee, all of whom must be independent. Under NASDAQ rules, our audit committee must have one independent member at the time of listing, a majority of independent members within 90 days of listing, and consist of all independent members within one year of listing. Ms. DuBard meets the independent director standard under NASDAQ’s listing standard and under Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act and will serve as chairperson of the audit committee.


Each member of the audit committee is financially literate, and our Board has determined that Ms. DuBard qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC rules.

We adopted an audit committee charter, which details the principal functions of the audit committee, including:

the appointment, compensation, retention, replacement, and oversight of the work of the independent auditors and any other independent registered public accounting firm engaged by us;
pre-approving all audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors or any other registered public accounting firm engaged by us, and establishing pre-approval policies and procedures;
reviewing and discussing with the independent auditors all relationships the auditors have with us in order to evaluate their continued independence;
setting clear hiring policies for employees or former employees of the independent auditors;
setting clear policies for audit partner rotation in compliance with applicable laws and regulations;
obtaining and reviewing a report, at least annually, from the independent auditors describing (i) the independent auditor’s internal quality-control procedures and (ii) any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the audit firm, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities within the preceding five years respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the firm and any steps taken to deal with such issues;
reviewing and approving any related party transaction required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC before us entering into such transaction; and
reviewing with management, the independent auditors, and our legal advisors, as appropriate, any legal, regulatory or compliance matters, including any correspondence with regulators or government agencies and any employee complaints or published reports that raise material issues regarding our financial statements or accounting policies and any significant changes in accounting standards or rules promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC or other regulatory authorities.

Compensation Committee

We established a compensation committee of the Board. John B. Connally III and Michael Bahorich serve as members of our compensation committee. Our compensation committee must have one independent member at the time of listing, a majority of independent members within 90 days of listing and consist of all independent members within one year of listing. Mr. Michael Bahorich meets the independent director standard under NASDAQ listing standards and will serve as chairman of the compensation committee.


We adopted a compensation committee charter, which details the principal functions of the compensation committee, including:

reviewing and approving on an annual basis the corporate goals and objectives relevant to our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, evaluating our Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives and determining and approving the remuneration (if any) of our Chief Executive Officer based on such evaluation;
reviewing and approving on an annual basis the compensation of all of our other officers;
reviewing on an annual basis our executive compensation policies and plans;
implementing and administering our incentive compensation equity-based remuneration plans;
assisting management in complying with our proxy statement and annual report disclosure requirements;
approving all special perquisites, special cash payments and other special compensation and benefit arrangements for our officers and employees;
if required, producing a report on executive compensation to be included in our annual proxy statement; and
reviewing, evaluating and recommending changes, if appropriate, to the remuneration for directors.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, as indicated above, no compensation of any kind, including finder’s, consulting or other similar fees will be paid to any of our existing stockholders, officers, directors or any of their respective affiliates, before, or for any services they render in order to complete the consummation of a business combination. Accordingly, it is likely that before the consummation of an initial business combination, the compensation committee will only be responsible for the review and recommendation of any compensation arrangements to be entered into in connection with such initial business combination.

The charter provides that the compensation committee may, in its sole discretion, retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser and will be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of any such adviser. However, before engaging or receiving advice from a compensation consultant, external legal counsel or any other adviser, the compensation committee will consider the independence of each such adviser, including the factors required by NASDAQ and the SEC.

Director Nominations

We do not have a standing nominating committee. In accordance with Rule 5605(e)(2) of the NASDAQ Rules, a majority of the independent directors may recommend a director nominee for selection by the Board. The Board believes that the independent directors can satisfactorily carry out the responsibility of properly selecting or approving director nominees without the formation of a standing nominating committee. As we do not have a standing nominating committee, we will not have a nominating committee charter in place.

Our Board considers candidates for nomination who have a high level of personal and professional integrity, strong ethics and values and the ability to make mature business judgments. In general, in identifying and evaluating nominees for director, our Board will also consider experience in corporate management such as serving as an officer or former officer of a publicly held company, experience as a board member of another publicly held company, professional and academic experience relevant to our business, leadership skills, experience in finance and accounting or executive compensation practices, whether candidate has the time required for preparation, participation and attendance at Board meetings and committee meetings, if applicable, independence and the ability to represent the best interests of our stockholders.


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of our officers currently serve, and in the past year none of them has served, as a member of the compensation committee of any entity that has one or more officers serving on our Board.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employees. The Code of Ethicsemployees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, which is available on our website. Our Code of Ethics is a “code of ethics,” as defined in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K. We will also postmake any legally required disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers of, provisions of our Codecode of Ethicsethics on our website.website at www.verdecleanfuels.com.

Corporate Governance GuidelinesLimitation on Liability and Indemnification Matters

Our Boardcharter contains provisions that limit the liability of our directors for damages to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Consequently, our directors will adopt corporate governance guidelines in accordance with the corporate governance rules of NASDAQ that servenot be personally liable to us or our stockholders for damages as a flexible framework within which our Board and its committees operate. These guidelines will cover a numberresult of areas including board membership criteria and director qualifications, director responsibilities, board agenda, roles of the Chairman of the board, Chief Executive Officer and presiding director, meetings of independent directors, committee responsibilities and assignments, board member accessan act or failure to management and independent advisors, director communications with third parties, director compensation, director orientation and continuing education, evaluation of senior management and management succession planning. A copy of our corporate governance guidelines is posted on our website.

Conflicts of Interest

Certain of our officers and directors presently has, and any of them in the future may have additional, fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities pursuant to which such officer or director is or will be required to present business combination opportunities to such entity. Accordingly, in the future, if any of our officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity which is suitable for an entity to which he or she has then-current fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she will honor his or her fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such opportunity to such entity. We do not believe, however, that any fiduciary duties or contractual obligations of our officers arising in the future would materially undermine our ability to complete our business combination. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we renounce our interest in any corporate opportunity offered to any director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solelyact in his or her capacity as a director, or officer of our company and such opportunity is one we are legally and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for us to pursue.unless:

Our officers and directors have agreed not to become an officer or director of any other special purpose acquisition company with a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act that competes with our business or with the business of the planned business combination, and to provide us advance notice if they intend to serve on any other board of a special purpose acquisition company.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, we may pursue an acquisition opportunity jointly with our sponsor, or one or more of its affiliates, which we refer to as an “Affiliated Joint Acquisition.” Such entities may co-invest with us in the target business at the time of our initial business combination, or we could raise additional proceeds to complete the acquisition by issuing to such entity a class of equity or equity-linked securities. Each of our officers and directors presently has, and any of them in the future, may have additional fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities pursuant to which such officer or director is or will be required to present a business combination opportunity to such entity. Accordingly, if any of our officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity which is suitable for an entity to which he or she has then-current fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she will honor his or her fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such opportunity to such other entity. We do not believe, however, that the fiduciary duties or contractual obligations of our officers or directors will materially affect our ability to complete our business combination. In addition, we may pursue an Affiliated Joint Acquisition opportunity with an entity to which an officer or director has a fiduciary or contractual obligation. Any such entity may co-invest with us in the target business at the time of our initial business combination, or we could raise additional proceeds to complete the acquisition by issuing to such entity a class of equity or equity-linked securities. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we renounce our interest in any corporate opportunity offered to any director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of our company and such opportunity is one we are legally and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for us to pursue. In addition, the company and its affiliates, including our officers and directors who are affiliated with the company, may sponsor or form other blank check companies similar to ours during the period in which we are seeking an initial business combination. Any such companies may present additional conflicts of interest in pursuing an acquisition target. However, we do not believe that any such potential conflicts would materially affect our ability to complete our initial business combination.


Potential investors should also be aware of the following other potential conflicts of interest:

None of our officers or directors is required to commit his or her full time to our affairs in particular and, accordingly, each of them may have conflicts of interest in allocating his or her time among various business activities.
In the course of their other business activities, our officers and directors may become aware of investment and business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to us as well as the other entities with which they are affiliated. Our officers and directors may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.
Our sponsor, officers and directors have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to any founder shares and any public shares held by them in connection with the consummation of our initial business combination. Additionally, our sponsor, officers and directors have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to any founder shares held by them if we fail to consummate our initial business combination within 12 months (or within 18 months if we extend the period of time to consummate our initial business combination in accordance with the terms described in the IPO’s registration statement) closing of the IPO. If we do not complete our initial business combination within such applicable time period, the proceeds of the sale of the private placement warrants held in the trust account will be used to fund the redemption of our public shares, and the private placement warrants will expire worthless. With certain limited exceptions, the founder shares will not be transferable, assignable by our sponsor until the earlier of: (A) six months after the completion of our initial business combination or (B) after our initial business combination, (x) if the last sale price of our Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 75 days after our initial business combination, or (y) the date on which we complete a liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange, reorganization or other similar transaction that results in all of our stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property. With certain limited exceptions, the private placement warrants and the Class A common stock underlying such warrants, will not be transferable, assignable or salable by our sponsor or its permitted transferees until 30 days after the completion of our initial business combination. Our underwriters have also agreed to restrictions on transfer with respect to their representative shares as detailed below. Since our sponsor, underwriters and officers and directors may directly or indirectly own common stock and warrants following the IPO, our officers and directors may have a conflict of interest in determining whether a particular target business is an appropriate business with which to complete our initial business combination.
Our officers and directors may have a conflict of interest with respect to evaluating a particular business combination if the retention or resignation of any such officers and directors was included by a target business as a condition to any agreement with respect to our initial business combination.
Our sponsor, officers or directors may have a conflict of interest with respect to evaluating a business combination and financing arrangements as we may obtain loans from our sponsor or an affiliate of our sponsor or any of our officers or directors to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended initial business combination. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into warrants at a price of $1.00 per warrant at the option of the lender. Such warrants would be identical to the private placement warrants, including as to exercise price, exercisability and exercise period.
The representative shares held by the representative and/or its designees will also be worthless if we do not consummate an initial business combination. Therefore, if the representative provides services to us in connection with our initial business combination, these financial interests may result in the representative having a conflict of interest when providing such services to us.

The conflicts described above may not be resolved in our favor.


In general, officers and directors of a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware are required to present business opportunities to a corporation if:

the corporation could financially undertakepresumption that directors are acting in good faith, on an informed basis, and with a view to the opportunity;
the opportunity is within the corporation’s lineinterests of business;Verde Clean Fuels has been rebutted; and

it would not be fairis proven that the director’s act or failure to our companyact constituted a breach of his or her fiduciary duties as a director and its stockholders for the opportunity not to be brought to the attentionsuch breach involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of the corporation.law.

Accordingly, as a result of multiple business affiliations, our officers and directors may have similar legal obligations relating to presenting business opportunities meeting the above-listed criteria to multiple entities. Furthermore, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we renounce our interest in any corporate opportunity offered to any director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of our company and such opportunity is one we are legally and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for us to pursue, and to the extent the director or officer is permitted to refer that opportunity to us without violating another legal obligation.

We are not prohibited from pursuing an initial business combination with a company that is affiliated with our sponsor, officers or directors, subject to certain approvals and consents. In the event we seek to complete our initial business combination with such a company, we, or a committee of independent directors, would obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm which is a member of FINRA, or from an independent accounting firm, that such an initial business combination is fair to our company from a financial point of view.

We cannot assure you that any of the above-mentioned conflicts will be resolved in our favor.

If we submit our initial business combination to our public stockholders for a vote, our sponsor has agreed to vote any founder shares held by it and any public shares purchased during or after the IPO, and the anchor investors have agreed to vote any founder shares held by them, in favor of our initial business combination and our officers and directors have also agreed to vote any public shares purchased during or after the IPO in favor of our initial business combination.

Limitation on Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that our officers and directors will be indemnified by us to the fullest extent authorized by Delaware law, as it now exists or may in the future be amended. In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that our directors will not be personally liable for monetary damages to us or our stockholders for breaches of their fiduciary duty as directors, unless they violated their duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders, acted in bad faith, knowingly or intentionally violated the law, authorized unlawful payments of dividends, unlawful stock purchases or unlawful redemptions, or derived an improper personal benefit from their actions as directors.

We entered into agreements with our officers and directors to provide contractual indemnification in addition to the indemnification provided for in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Our bylaws also will permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director or employee for any liability arising out of his or her actions, regardless of whether Delaware law would permit such indemnification. We purchased a policy of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that insures our officers and directors against the cost of defense, settlement or payment of a judgment in some circumstances and insures us against our obligations to indemnify our officers and directors.

These provisions may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against officers and directors, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders. Furthermore, a stockholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against officers and directors pursuant to these indemnification provisions.

We believe that these provisions, the directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and the indemnity agreements are necessary to attract and retain talented and experienced officers and directors.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.


Technical Committee

In addition to management, the company has assembled a group of professionals to serve as a non-executive technical committee. Members of the technical committee shall receive founder shares and may be considered for full-time employment by the company upon completion of a Qualifying Transaction. Access to the talents and experience of the technical committee members enhances the due diligence abilities of the company without the necessity and expense of a full-time technical staff. Members of the technical committee and their biographies are below:

Eric Bahorich

Mr. Bahorich has been working in the upstream E&P industry for seven years with diverse experience across conventional and unconventional reservoirs at both large and small companies. Starting out as an operations and reservoir engineer at Noble Energy, he worked in field and office capacities on corporate projects and on University-backed research projects. Eric identified a hydraulic fracturing fluid mixture that increased well production by 15% on average while only increasing costs by 1%. This methodology was adopted and implemented widely in the field. While with Durango Resources as the only reservoir engineer on staff, he sourced, modeled, pitched, and closed a deal in the Permian that resulted in doubling the size of the company over a few months without selling equity.

Kara Bennett

Ms. Bennett has 6 years of experience in upstream oil and gas as a reservoir engineer in addition to 3 years of experience in the non-profit space as a project manager. She most recently worked for Quantum Reservoir Impact (QRI) in a technical senior advisory role delivering solutions for oil & gas operators, banks, and investment groups through augmented AI. She worked on 18 fields across North America, South America, the Middle East, and China. She has experience working on both onshore and offshore as well as conventional and unconventional plays.

Ms. Bennett served as a project manager for Border Green Energy Team, a small non-profit that implements renewable energy technologies along the Thailand-Myanmar border. She also co-founded a children’s home, Grace Boarding, which provides a home and future for 26 hill tribe children by providing them the opportunity to attend school.  Ms. Bennett holds a B.S. in Biomechanical Engineering and a M.S. in Energy Resources Engineering both from Stanford University. She is currently an MBA candidate at London Business School.

Emily Boecking

Ms. Boecking is a dynamic, highly engaged petroleum engineer with over 12 years of industry experience.  Ms. Boecking has extensive experience in the acquisition & divestiture space where she has advised and supported the evaluation of nearly $5 billion in transactions, both on the advisory side at Wells Fargo Securities as well as in corporate development at Anadarko Petroleum Company.  Additionally, she has served in a wide array of operational roles including asset manager, reservoir engineer, and field engineer at companies such as Chesapeake Energy and Sanchez Oil & Gas.  Emily currently works in the reserve based lending space at Bank of Oklahoma Financial where she evaluates the company’s current and prospective loans.  These roles have given Ms. Boecking a vast working knowledge of all the major U.S. Onshore basins including Permian, Eagle Ford, Haynesville, Powder River, DJ, and SCOOP/STACK, as well as numerous legacy vertical and enhanced recovery fields. Ms. Boecking is a graduate from Duke University where she received her B.S.E. in mechanical engineering and biomedical engineering.

Sara Martin

Ms. Martin has 12 years of experience as a geologist, engineer, and decision analyst in upstream oil and gas for E&P companies and private investors. Two years ago, she started a consulting company that specializes in risk assessment and decision analysis for energy investments. Before going independent, she spent 10 years with Chevron, Noble Energy, and Newfield Exploration as a geologist and engineer working exploration and production operations in multiple countries, basins, and reservoir types.

She holds a B.S. in Geology and M.S. in Petroleum Engineering from Texas A&M University. Professional certifications include Strategic Decision and Risk Management from McCombs Executive Education at University of Texas at Austin. She is published in the Society of Petroleum Engineers at SPE-117703-MS.


Ondrej Sestak

Mr. Sestak has 5 years of experience in the energy and finance sectors. First as a reservoir engineer for Shell where he developed forecasts, reserve reports, and subsurface models in the Haynesville shale and Vaca Muerta basin. He also worked as an analyst at a private equity firm, Odien Group, in Prague researching and developing investor material for a €750 million luxury accommodation portfolio across Europe. Since 2018 he has been working with INEXS to value oil and gas assets for acquisitions, divestitures, and bankruptcies. Ondrej has a MS degree in Energy Resource Engineering from Stanford University and BS in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. He is an active member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, or SPE.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. These executive officers, directors, and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms filed by such reporting persons. 

Based solely upon our review of the Section 16(a) filings that have been furnished to us and representations by our directors and executive officers (where applicable), we believe that all filings required to be made under Section 16(a) during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 were timely made.

ITEM 11. Executive Compensation

Executive Officer and Director CompensationIn accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the Company intends to file with the SEC the information required by this item not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.

None of our officers or directors has received any cash compensation for services rendered to us. No compensation of any kind, including finder’s and consulting fees, will be paid to our sponsor, officers and directors, or any of their respective affiliates, for services rendered before or in connection with the completion of our initial business combination.

Our sponsor, officers and directors, or any of their respective affiliates, will be reimbursed for any bona-fide, documented out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with activities on our behalf such as identifying potential target businesses and performing due diligence on suitable business combinations. Our audit committee will review on a quarterly basis all payments that were made to our sponsor, officers, directors or our or their affiliates.

After the completion of our initial business combination, directors or members of our management team who remain with us may be paid consulting or management fees from the combined company. All of these fees will be fully disclosed to stockholders, to the extent then known, in the tender offer materials or proxy solicitation materials furnished to our stockholders in connection with a proposed business combination. We have not established any limit on the amount of such fees that may be paid by the combined company to our directors or members of management. It is unlikely the amount of such compensation will be known at the time of the proposed business combination, because the directors of the post-combination business will be responsible for determining officer and director compensation. Any compensation to be paid to our officers will be determined, or recommended to the Board for determination, either by a compensation committee constituted solely by independent directors or by a majority of independent directors on our board of directors.

Following a business combination, to the extent we deem it necessary, we may seek to recruit additional managers to supplement the incumbent management team of the target business. We cannot assure you that we will have the ability to recruit additional managers, or that additional managers will have the requisite skills, knowledge or experience necessary to enhance the incumbent management.

ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forthIn accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the Company intends to file with the SEC the information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of January 31, 2022 based on information obtained from the persons named below, with respect to the beneficial ownership of common stock, by:

each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock;
each of our executive officers and directors that beneficially owns our common stock; and
all our executive officers and directors as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of our common stock beneficially ownedrequired by them. As of March 18, 2022 there were 17,439,750 shares of Class A common stock and 4,312,500 shares of Class B common stock outstanding. The following table doesthis item not reflect record or beneficial ownership of the private placement warrants as these warrants are not exercisable within 60 days of March 18, 2022. Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of our stockholders is CENAQ Energy Corp. 4550 Post Oak Place Dr., Suite 300, Houston, Texas.


  Beneficial Ownership 
Name of Security holder Class A
Shares
  %  Class B
Shares(1)
  %  Total
Shares
  % 
CENAQ Sponsor, LLC (2)
  -   -   3,487,500   80.87%  3,487,500   16.03%
Lighthouse Investment Partners, LLC (3)
  2,009,951   11.53%  -   -   2,009,951   9.24%
Shaolin Capital Management LLC (4)
  1,485,000   8.52%          1,485,000   6.83%
Saba Capital Management, L.P. (5)
 
  1,418,052   8.13%          1,418,052   6.52%
Highbridge Capital Management, LLC (6)
  1,408,275   8.08%  -   -   1,408,275   6.47%
Yakira Partners, L.P.(7)
  1,381,192   7.92%  -   -   1,381,192   6.35%
                         
                         
John B. Connally III (2)(8)
  -   -   3,487,500   80.87%  3,487,500   16.17%
J. Russell Porter (2)(8)
  -   -   3,487,500   80.87%  3,487,500   16.17%
Michael J. Mayell (2)(8)
  -   -   3,487,500   80.87%  3,487,500   16.17%
Benjamin Francisco Salinas Sada (8)
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Denise DuBard (8)  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Michael S. Bahorich (8)  -   -   -   -   -   - 
David Bullion (8)  -   -   -   -   -   - 
All officers and directors as a group (7 individuals) (2)(8)
  -   -   3,487,500   80.87%  3,487,500   16.03%

(1) 

Interests shown consist solely of founder shares, classified as shares of Class B common stock. Such shares will automatically convert into shares of Class A common stock at the time of our initial business combination.

(2) Our sponsor is the record holder of such shares. Messrs. John B. Connally III, J. Russell Porter and Michael J. Mayell are each a manager of CENAQ Sponsor, LLC, and as such, each has voting and investment discretion with respect to the founder shares held of record by our sponsor and may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of the founder shares held directly by our sponsor. Messrs. John B. Connally III, J. Russell Porter and Michael J. Mayell each disclaims any beneficial ownership of the reported shares other than to the extent of any pecuniary interest he may have therein, directly or indirectly.
(3) Information based on a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 8, 2022. According to the report, Lighthouse Investment Partners, LLC, or Lighthouse, serves as the investment manager of MAP 214 and MAP 136. LHP Ireland serves as the manager to MAP 501, LMAP 909, LMAP 910. Because Lighthouse and LHP Ireland may be deemed to control MAP 214, MAP 136, MAP 501, LMAP 909, and LMAP 910, as applicable, Lighthouse and LHP Ireland may be deemed to beneficially own, and to have the power to vote or direct the vote of, and the power to direct the disposition of the shares reported. Each of MAP 214 and MAP 136 are segregated portfolios of LMA SPC, a Cayman Islands segregated portfolio company. MAP 501 is a sub-trust of an Ireland umbrella unit trust. Each of LMAP 909 and LMAP 910 are sub-funds of an Irish collective asset-management vehicle. Lighthouse is a Delaware limited liability company. LHP Ireland is an Ireland limited company. The addresses of Lighthouse are 3801 PGA Boulevard, Suite 500, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 and32 Molesworth Street, Dublin, D02 Y512, Ireland.  

(4) Information based on a Schedule 13G filed on February 11, 2022. According to the report, Shaolin Capital Management LLC, a company incorporated under the laws of State of Delaware, serves as the investment advisor to Shaolin Capital Partners Master Fund, Ltd.  a Cayman Islands exempted company, MAP 214 Segregated Portfolio, a segregated portfolio of LMA SPC, and DS Liquid DIV RVA SCM LLC being managed accounts advised by the Shaolin Capital Management LLC. The address of Shaolin Capital is 7610 NE 4th Court, Suite 104 Miami FL 33138.

(5)Information based on a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 14, 2022. According to the report, the schedule was filed by Saba Capital Management, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Saba Capital Management GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Mr. Boaz R. Weinstein. The address of Saba Capital is 405 Lexington Avenue, 58th Floor, New York, New York 10174.
(6)Information based on a Schedule 13G/A filed on January 27, 2022. According to the report, Highbridge is a Delaware limited liability company. The address of the business office of Reporting Person is 277 Park Avenue, 23rd Floor, New York, New York 10172.
(7)Information based on a Schedule 13G filed on February 9, 2022. According to the report, Yakira Capital Management, Inc. and Yakira Partners L.P. are Delaware entities. MAP 136 Segregated Portfolio is a Cayman Island entity. The address of Yakira Capital 1555 Post Road East, Suite 202, Westport, CT 06880.

(8)

Does not include any shares indirectly owned by this individual as a result of his/her ownership interest in our sponsor.


Restrictions on Transfers of Founder Shares and Private Placement Warrants

The founder shares and the private placement warrants, and any shares of Class A common stock issued upon conversion or exercise thereof are subject to transfer restrictions pursuant to lock-up provisions in a letter agreement (otherlater than the founder shares that may be transferred to the anchor investors, which are subject to transfer restrictions pursuant to an investment agreement) to be entered into by us, our sponsor, officers and directors. Those lock-up provisions provide that such securities are not transferable or salable (i) in the case of the founder shares, until the earlier of (A) six months after the completion of our initial business combination or (B) after our initial business combination, (x) if the last sale price of our Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 75 days after our initial business combination, or (y) the date on which we complete a liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange, reorganization or other similar transaction that results in all of our stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property, and (ii) in the case of the private placement warrants and the Class A common stock underlying such warrants, until 30120 days after the completion of our initial business combination, except in each case (a) to our officers or directors, any affiliates or family members of any of our officers or directors, any members of our sponsor, or any affiliates of our sponsor, (b) in the case of an individual, by gift to a memberend of the individual’s immediate family, to a trust, the beneficiary of which is a member of the individual’s immediate family or an affiliate of such person, or to a charitable organization; (c) in the case of an individual,fiscal year covered by virtue of laws of descent and distribution upon death of the individual; (d) in the case of an individual, pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order; (e) by private sales or transfers made in connection with the consummation of a business combination at prices no greater than the price at which the securities were originally purchased; (f) in the event of our liquidation before the completion of our initial business combination; (g) by virtue of the laws of Delaware or our sponsor’s limited liability company agreement upon dissolution of our sponsor; or (h) in the event of our liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange, reorganization or other similar transaction which results in all of our stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property after the completion of our initial business combination; provided, however, that in the case of clauses (a) through (h) these permitted transferees must enter into a written agreement agreeing to be bound by these transfer restrictions.this Form 10-K.

Registration Rights

The holders of the founder shares, placement warrants, and warrants that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans, and any shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of the placement warrants and any warrants (and underlying Class A common stock) that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans and Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of the founder shares, will be entitled to registration rights pursuant to a registration rights agreement which they have entered into with us, requiring us to register such securities for resale (in the case of the founder shares, only after conversion to our Class A common stock). The holders of the majority of these securities are entitled to make up to three demands, excluding short form demands, that we register such securities. In addition, the holders have certain “piggy-back” registration rights with respect to registration statements filed subsequent to our completion of our initial business combination and rights to require us to register for resale such securities pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act. The registration rights agreement does not contain liquidated damages or other cash settlement provisions resulting from delays in registering our securities. We will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Table

As of December 31, 2021, we had no compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities were authorized for issuance.

Changes in Control

None.

ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Certain Relationships and Related TransactionsIn accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the Company intends to file with the SEC the information required by this item not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.

ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The following is a summary of transactions since our formation,

 In accordance with General Instruction G(3) to which we have been a participant in whichForm 10-K, the amount involved exceeded or will exceedCompany intends to file with the lesser of $120,000 or 1%SEC the information required by this item not later than 120 days after the end of the average of our total assets as of December 31, 2021, and in which any of our directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any member of the immediate family of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is Deloitte & Touche LLP, PCAOB ID: 34


 

Founder Shares

On December 31, 2020, the Sponsor paid $25,000, or approximately $0.006 per share, to cover certain offering costs in consideration for 4,312,500 Class B common stocks, par value $0.0001 (the “Founder Shares”). Up to 562,500 Founder Shares are subject to forfeiture by the Sponsor depending on the extent to which the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised. On August 19, 2021, the underwriters exercised the over-allotment option in full. As a result, these 562,500 founder shares are no longer subject to forfeiture. 

Additionally, upon consummation of the IPO, the Sponsor sold 75,000 Founder Shares to each of the 11 Anchor Investors that purchased at least 9.9% of the units sold in the IPO, at their original purchase price of approximately $0.0058 per share. The aggregate fair value of these founder shares attributable to anchor investors is $570,406, or $7.60 per share. The Company offset the excess of the fair value against the gross proceeds from these anchor investors as a reduction in its additional paid-in capital.

The initial stockholders and the Anchor Investors have agreed not to transfer, assign or sell any of their Founder Shares and any Class A common stock issuable upon conversion thereof until the earlier to occur of: (A) six months after the completion of the initial Business Combination or (B) subsequent to the initial Business Combination, (x) if the last sale price of the Company’s Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 75 days after the initial Business Combination, or (y) the date on which the Company completes a liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of its stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property (the “Lock-up” ). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if (1) the closing price of the Company’s Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock capitalizations, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 75 days after the initial Business Combination, or (2) the Company completes a liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of its stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property, the Founder Shares will be released from the Lock-up.

Due from related Party

The Company had $45,312 due from a related party which consisted of $50,000 incurred from purchase of over-allotment private warrants, offset by $4,688 of other miscellaneous costs paid by Michael J. Mayell and the Sponsor. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company had $0 due from a related party. The Sponsor paid off the balance in full on October 1, 2021.

Promissory Note — Related Party

On December 31, 2020, the Sponsor agreed to loan the Company up to $500,000 to be used for a portion of the expenses of the IPO. These loans were non-interest bearing, unsecured and were due at the earlier of September 30, 2021 or the closing of the IPO. As of December 31, 2020, the Company borrowed $88,333 under the promissory note and the loan was fully repaid upon the closing of the IPO out of the offering proceeds. As of December 31, 2021, the promissory note balance was $0.

Working Capital Loans

In addition, in order to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended Business Combination, the Sponsor or an affiliate of the Sponsor, or certain of the Company’s officers and directors may, but are not obligated to, loan the Company funds as may be required (“Working Capital Loans”). If the Company completes the initial Business Combination, the Company would repay the Working Capital Loans. In the event that the initial Business Combination does not close, the Company may use a portion of the working capital held outside the Trust Account to repay the Working Capital Loans but no proceeds from the Trust Account would be used to repay the Working Capital Loans. Up to $1,500,000 of such Working Capital Loans may be convertible into Private Placement Warrants at a price of $1.00 per warrant at the option of the lender. Such warrants would be identical to the Private Placement Warrants. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had no borrowings under the Working Capital Loans.


Related Person Transaction Policy

We have adopted a written policy relating to the approval of related person transactions. A “related person transaction” is a transaction or arrangement or series of transactions or arrangements in which we participate (whether or not we are a party) and a related person has a direct or indirect material interest in such transaction. Our audit committee will review and approve or ratify all relationships and related person transactions between us and (i) our directors, director nominees or executive officers, (ii) any record or beneficial owner of 5% or more of our common stock or (iii) any immediate family member of any person specified in (i) and (ii). The audit committee will review all related person transactions and, where the audit committee determines that such transactions are in our best interests, approve such transactions in advance of such transaction being given effect.

As set forth in the related person transaction policy, in the course of its review and approval or ratification of a related party transaction, the audit committee will, in its judgment, consider in light of the relevant facts and circumstances whether the transaction is, or is not inconsistent with, our best interests, including consideration of various factors enumerated in the policy.

Any member of the audit committee who is a related person with respect to a transaction under review will not be permitted to participate in the discussions or approval or ratification of the transaction. Our policy also includes certain exceptions for transactions that need not be reported and provides the audit committee with the discretion to pre-approve certain transactions.

To further minimize conflicts of interest, we have agreed not to consummate an initial business combination with an entity that is affiliated with any of our sponsor, officers or directors unless we, or a committee of independent directors, have obtained an opinion from an independent investment banking firm which is a member of FINRA or an independent accounting firm that our initial business combination is fair to our company from a financial point of view. Furthermore, no finder’s fees, reimbursements or cash payments will be made to our sponsor, officers or directors, or our or their affiliates, for services rendered to us before or in connection with the completion of our initial business combination. However, the following payments will be made to our sponsor, officers or directors, or our or their affiliates, none of which will be made from the proceeds of the IPO held in the trust account before the completion of our initial business combination:

Reimbursement for any out-of-pocket expenses related to our formation and initial public offering and to identifying, investigating and completing an initial business combination; and
Repayment of loans which may be made by our sponsor or an affiliate of our sponsor or certain of our officers and directors to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended initial business combination, the terms of which have not been determined nor have any written agreements been executed with respect thereto. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into warrants, at a price of $1.00 per warrant at the option of the lender.

Our audit committee will review on a quarterly basis all payments that were made to our sponsor, officers or directors, or our or their affiliates.


ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.PART IV

The following table represents aggregate fees billed to us for the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) to December 31, 2020 and for the year ended December 31, 2021, by Marcum LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm.

  Year Ended
December 31, 
2021
  June 24, 
2020
(inception) to
December 31, 
2020
 
Audit Fees $116,905  $                    - 
Audit-Related Fees  -   - 
Tax Fees  -   - 
All Other Fees  -   - 
Total Fees $116,905  $- 

Audit Fees

Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our year-end financial statements, reviews of our quarterly financial statements and services that are normally provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with regulatory filings. The aggregate fees billed for audit fees, inclusive of required filings with the SEC and for services rendered in connection with our initial public offering for the year ended December 31, 2021, totaled $116,905. There were no audit fees billed for the period from inception through December 31, 2020. Our audit fees related to the December 31, 2021 financial statements are expected to be approximately $30,900.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to performance of the audit or review of our year-end financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include attest services that are not required by statute or regulation and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards. We did not pay Marcum LLP audit-related fees during the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020 or for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Tax Fees

Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services relating to tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice. We did not pay Marcum LLP any tax fees during the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020 or for the year ended December 31, 2021.

All Other Fees

All other fees consist of fees billed for all other services. We did not pay Marcum LLP for other fees during the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020 or for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Pre-Approval Policy

Our audit committee was formed upon the consummation of our IPO. As a result, the audit committee did not pre-approve all of the foregoing services, although any services rendered prior to the formation of our audit committee were approved by our board of directors. Since the formation of our audit committee, and on a going-forward basis, the audit committee has and will pre-approve all auditing services and permitted non-audit services to be performed for us by our auditors, including the fees and terms thereof (subject to the de minimis exceptions for non-audit services described in the Exchange Act which are approved by the audit committee prior to the completion of the audit).


PART IV

ITEM 15.15. Exhibits, Financial Statements andConsolidated Financial Statement Schedules

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this Report:Form 10-K:

(1)Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements:

See Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

(2)Page
Index toConsolidated Financial StatementsF-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 688)F-2
Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2021F-3
Statement of Operations for the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2021F-4
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2021F-5
Statement of Cash Flows for the period from June 24, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2021F-6
Notes to Financial StatementsF-7Schedules:

None.

(2)Financial Statements Schedule

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the amounts are immaterial and not required, or the required information is presented in the financial statements and notes beginning on F-1 on this Report.

(3)Exhibits

We hereby file as part of this Report the exhibits listed in the attached Exhibit Index. Exhibits which are incorporated herein by reference can be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such material can also be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates or on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

    Incorporated by Reference Filed/Furnished
Exhibit No.  Description Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date Herewith
2.1† Business Combination Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2022, by and among the Company, CENAQ, Holdings, OpCo and Sponsor. 8-K 001-40743 2.1 8/12/2022  
2.2 Amendment No. 1 to the Business Combination Agreement, dated December 21, 2022 by and among CENAQ, OpCo, Holdings, Intermediate and Sponsor. 8-K 001-40743 2.2 2/21/2023  
3.1 Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. 8-K 001-40743 3.1 2/21/2023  
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. 8-K 001-40743 3.2 2/21/2023  
4.1 Specimen Unit Certificate. S-1 333-253695 4.1 8/6/2021  
4.2 Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate. S-1 333-253695 4.2 8/6/2021  
4.3 Specimen Warrant Certificate. S-1 333-253695 4.3 8/6/2021  
4.4 Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and CENAQ Energy Corp., dated August 17, 2021. 8-K 001-40743 4.4 8/17/2021  
4.5 Description of Securities of Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. 10-K 001-40743 4.5 3/31/2023  
10.1 Form of Verde Clean Fuels Indemnification Agreement 8-K 001-40743 10.1 2/21/2023  
10.2 2023 Omnibus Incentive Plan 8-K 001-40743 10.2 2/21/2023  
10.3 Letter Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2021, by and among CENAQ Energy Corp. and its officers and directors and CENAQ Sponsor, LLC. 8-K 001-40743 10.1 8/17/21  
10.4 Amendment No. 1 to Sponsor Letter Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2022, by and among CENAQ Energy Corp. and its officers and directors and CENAQ Sponsor, LLC. 8-K 001-40743 10.9 2/21/2023  
10.5 Amendment No. 2 to Sponsor Letter Agreement, dated as of February 14, 2023, by and among CENAQ Energy Corp. and its officers and directors and CENAQ Sponsor, LLC. 8-K 001-40743 10.10 2/21/2023  
10.6 Sponsor Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2022, by and among the Company, CENAQ, Holdings and Sponsor. 8-K 001-40743 10.1    8/12/22  
10.7 Underwriters Letter, dated as of August 12, 2022, by and among Intermediate, CENAQ, Holdings and the underwriters. 8-K 001-40743 10.2    8/12/22 
10.8 Form of Subscription Agreement. 8-K 001-40743 10.3    8/12/22  
10.9 Tax Receivable Agreement, dated February 15, 2023, by and among Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. and the persons named therein. 8-K 001-40743 10.5    2/21/2023  
10.10 A&R Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 15, 2023, by and among Verde Clean Fuels, Inc. and the persons named therein. 8-K 001-40743 10.6    2/21/2023  
10.11 OpCo A&R LLC Agreement, including any Certificates of Designations. 8-K 001-40743 10.7 2/21/2023  
10.12 Lock-Up Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2022. 8-K 001-40743 10.5 8/12/22  
10.13 Equity Participation Right Agreement, dated as of February 13, 2023, by and among CENAQ, OpCo and Cottonmouth. 8-K 001-40743 10.4 2/14/2023  


 

    Incorporated by Reference Filed/Furnished
Exhibit No.  Description Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date Herewith
3.1Certificate of Incorporation.  S-1 333-2536953.1 3/16/2021       
3.2Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.  S-1 333-2536953.2 3/16/2021       
3.2Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.  S-1 333-2536953.4 6/21/2021       
3.4Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.  S-1 333-2536953.5 8/6/2021       
3.5Bylaws.  S-1 333-2536953.5 6/21/2021       
3.6Certificate of Validation.  S-1 333-2536953.4 3/1/2021       
4.1Specimen Unit Certificate.  S-1 333-2536954.1 3/1/2021       
4.2Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate.  S-1 333-2536954.2 3/1/2021       
4.3Specimen Warrant Certificate.  S-1 333-2536954.3 3/1/2021       
4.4Form of Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and CENAQ Energy Corp.  S-1 333-2536954.4 3/1/2021       
4.5Description of Securities of CENAQ Energy Corp.          X
10.1Form of Letter Agreement among CENAQ Energy Corp. and its officers and directors and CENAQ Sponsor, LLC.  S-1 333-25369510.1 3/1/2021       
10.2Form of Investment Management Trust Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and CENAQ Energy Corp.  S-1 333-25369510.2 3/1/2021       
10.3Form of Registration Rights Agreement among CENAQ Energy Corp. and certain security holders.  S-1 333-25369510.3  3/1/2021       
10.4Securities Subscription Agreement, dated December 31, 2020, between CENAQ Energy Corp. and CENAQ Sponsor, LLC.  S-1 333-25369510.4  3/1/2021       
10.5Sponsor Warrants Purchase Agreement, dated March 1, 2021, between CENAQ Energy Corp. and CENAQ Sponsor, LLC.  S-1 333-25369510.5  3/1/2021       
10.6Form of Underwriters Warrants Purchase Agreement between CENAQ Energy Corp. and the Underwriters  S-1 333-25369510.6  6/21/2021       
10.7Form of Indemnity Agreement. Promissory Note, dated December 31, 2020 issued to CENAQ Sponsor, LLC.  S-1 333-25369510.6  3/1/2021       
10.8Form of Letter Agreement between CENAQ Energy Corp. and the Underwriters  S-1 333-25369510.9 3/1/2021       

10.9 

Form of Investment Agreement with Anchor Investors

  S-1 333-25369510.10  3/1/2021       
24Power of Attorney (included on signature pages of this Annual Report on Form 10-K)           
31.1Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.          X
31.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.          X
32.1Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.          X

32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

          X
101.INSInline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.          X
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document          X
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document          X
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document          X
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document          X
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document          X
104Inline XBRL for the cover page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, included in the Exhibit 101 Inline XBRL Document Set.          X
    Incorporated by Reference Filed/Furnished
Exhibit No.  Description Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date Herewith
10.14 Lease Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2011, by and between Hillsborough Park, L.L.C. and Primus Green Energy. 10-K  001-40743  10.13 3/31/2023  
10.15 First Amendment to the Lease Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2015, by and between Hillsborough Park, L.L.C. and Primus Green Energy (the “Lease Agreement”). 10-K  001-40743  10.14 3/31/2023  
10.16 Second Amendment to the Lease Agreement, dated as of December 24, 2018, by and between Hillsborough Park, L.L.C. and Primus Green Energy. 10-K  001-40743  10.15 3/31/2023  
10.17 Third Amendment to the Lease Agreement, dated as of December, 2019 by and between Hillsborough Park, L.L.C. and Primus Green Energy. 10-K  001-40743  10.16 3/31/2023  
10.18 Fourth Amendment to the Lease Agreement, dated as of December 29, 2020, by and between Hillsborough Park, L.L.C. and Bluescape Clean Fuels, LLC. 10-K  001-40743  10.17 3/31/2023  
10.19 Fifth Amendment to the Lease Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2021, by and between Hillsborough Park, L.L.C. and Bluescape Clean Fuels, LLC. 10-K  001-40743  10.18 3/31/2023  
10.20 Sixth Amendment to the Lease Agreement, dated as of January 4, 2023, by and between Hillsborough Park, L.L.C. and Bluescape Clean Fuels, LLC. 10-K  001-40743  10.19 3/31/2023  
10.21 Promissory Note, dated February 15, 2023, issued to the CENAQ Sponsor by Verde Clean Fuels. 10-K  001-40743  10.20 3/31/2023  
10.22 Seventh Amendment to the Lease Agreement, dated as of January 10, 2024, by and between Hillsborough Park, L.L.C. and Bluescape Clean Fuels, LLC         X
10.23 Employment Agreement, dated as of April 12, 2023 by and between the Company and Ernest B. Miller. 8-K 001-40743 10.1 4/17/2023  
10.24 Employment Agreement, dated as of April 12, 2023 by and between the Company and John Doyle 8-K 001-40743 10.2 4/17/2023  
16.1 Letter from Marcum LLP to the SEC dated February 15, 2023. 8-K 001-40743 16.1 2/21/2023  
19.1 Insider Trading Policy         X
21.1 List of subsidiaries. 8-K 001-40743 21.1 2/21/2023  
23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public accounting firm         X
24.1 Power of Attorney (included on signature pages of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).         X
31.1 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

         X
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.         X
32.1 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

         X
32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.         X
97.1 Policy Relating to Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation         X
101.INS Inline XBRL Instance Document.         X
101.SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.         X
101.CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.         X
101.DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.         X
101.LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.         X
101.PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.         X
104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).          

Schedules and exhibits to this Exhibit omitted pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(2). The Company agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to the SEC upon request.

ItemITEM 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.


 

SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

March 29, 202228, 2024

CENAQ Energy Corp.Verde Clean Fuels, Inc.
By:/s/ J. Russell PorterErnest Miller
Name:

J. Russell Porter

Ernest Miller
Title:Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose individual signature appears below hereby authorizes and appoints J. Russell Porter and Michael J. Mayell, and each of them, with full power of substitution and resubstitution and full power to act without the other,Ernest Miller as his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent to act in his or her name, place and stead and to execute in the name and on behalf of each person, individually and in each capacity stated below, and to file any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing, ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them or their or his or her substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

NamePositionDate
/s/ J. Russell PorterErnest MillerChief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

March 29, 202228, 2024

J. Russell PorterErnest Miller(Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting
Officer)
and Director
/s/  Michael J. MayellChief Financial OfficerMarch 29, 2022
Michael J. Mayell(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) and Director
/s/ John B. Connally IIIRon HulmeChairman of the Board

March 28, 2024

Ron HulmeMarch 29, 2022
John B. Connally III
/s/ Benjamin Francisco Salinas SadaMartijn DekkerDirector

March 28, 2024

Martijn DekkerMarch 29, 2022
Benjamin Francisco Salinas Sada
/s/ Denise DuBardCurtis Hébert, Jr.Director

March 28, 2024

Curtis Hébert, Jr.March 29, 2022
Denise DuBard
/s/ Michael S. BahorichDuncan PalmerDirector

March 28, 2024

Duncan PalmerMarch 29, 2022
Michael S. Bahorich
/s/ David BullionJonathan SieglerDirector

March 28, 2024

Jonathan SieglerMarch 29, 2022
David Bullion
/s/ Dail St. ClaireDirector

March 28, 2024

Dail St. Claire
/s/ Graham van’t HoffDirector

March 28, 2024

Graham van’t Hoff

81


iso4217:USD xbrli:shares