UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.20549
FORM 10-K
 (Mark
(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

ORFor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023

OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period fromto
Commission file numberFile Number 001-34221

The Providence Service CorporationModivCare Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware86-0845127
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
700 Canal Street, Third Floor, Stamford, CT
(Address of principal executive offices)
86-0845127
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
06902
(Zip code)
6900 E Layton Avenue, 12th Floor, Denver, Colorado80237
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code) 
(303) 728-7012
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (203) 307-2800code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each Class
class
Trading Symbol(s)Name of exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
Name of each exchange on which registered
MODV
The NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐  Yes ☒  No
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐  Yes ☒  No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒  Yes ☐  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405223.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months12-months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☒  Yes   ☐   No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer☐  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B)13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act. ☐


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.     ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).    ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of the registrant held by non-affiliates based oncomputed by reference to the closing price for suchat which the common equity as reportedwas last sold on The NASDAQ Global Select Market onas of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2017) was $576.8$635.0 million.

As of March 5, 2018,February 16, 2024, there were 14,198,141 shares outstanding 12,866,551 shares (excluding treasury shares of 4,656,738)5,424,587) of the registrant’s Common Stock,common stock, $0.001 par value per share.

 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

All or a portion of Items 10 through 14 inThe following documents are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are incorporated by reference to our10-K: the registrant’s definitive proxy statement onto be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under cover of Schedule 14A for our 2018 stockholder meeting;with respect to the registrant’s 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; provided, however, that if such proxy statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2018,29, 2024, such information will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on or before such date.



2


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.
PART I
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.1C.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
PART II
Item 5. 
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8. 
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
PART III
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13. 
Item 14.  
PART IV
Item 15. 
Item 16.Form 10-K Summary.



3


Part I
 
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this "Annual Report"), the words the “Company”, the “registrant”, “we”, “our”, “us”, “Providence”“ModivCare” and similar terms refer to The Providence Service CorporationModivCare Inc. and, except as otherwise specified herein, to ourits consolidated subsidiaries. When such terms are used in reference to the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, (theor our “Common Stock)Stock”, we are referring specifically and only to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Preferred Stock”), they refer specifically to The Providence Service Corporation.capital stock of ModivCare Inc.
 
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain statements that may be deemed “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Rule 175 promulgated thereunder, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 3b-6 promulgated thereunder, including statements related to the Company’s strategies or expectations about revenues, liabilities, results of operations, cash flows, ability to fund operations, profitability, ability to meet financial covenants, contracts or market opportunities. The Company may also make forward-looking statements in other reports and statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), in materials delivered to stockholders and in press releases. In addition, the Company’s representatives may from time to time make oral forward-looking statements. In certainmany cases, you may identify forward looking-statements by words such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “expect”, “plan”, “project”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “seek”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential”, “target”, “forecast”, “likely”, the negative of such terms or comparable terminology. In addition, statements that are not historical statements of fact should also be considered forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the Company’s current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about its business and industry, and involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual events to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risksThe factors included below under the caption “Summary Risk Factors” and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risks described in further detail below under Item 1A 1A. Risk Factors in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.are included among such risks and uncertainties.

You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made.made and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth herein. The Company is under no obligation to (and expressly disclaims any such obligation to) update any of the information in any forward-looking statement if such forward-looking statement later turns out to be inaccurate, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.otherwise, except to the extent otherwise required by applicable law. If we update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements.

Item 1.
Business.

Background
4


SUMMARY OF RISK FACTORS
The Providence Service Corporation owns subsidiaries
An investment in shares of our common stock involves a high degree of risk. If any of the factors listed below and investments primarily engageddescribed in more detail with the other identified risk factors included in the section entitled “Risk Factors” under Item 1A of this Annual Report occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and prospects could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose some or all of your investment. Some of the most material risks relating to an investment in our common stock include the impact or effect on our Company and its operating results, or its investors, of:

Risks Related to Our Industry

government or private insurance program funding reductions or limitations;
alternative payment models or the transition of Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries to Managed Care Organizations;
our inability to control reimbursement rates received for our services;
cost containment initiatives undertaken by private third-party payors and an inability to maintain or reduce our cost of services below rates set forth by our payors;
inadequacies in, or security breaches of, our information technology systems, including the systems intended to protect our clients’ privacy and confidential information; and
the effects of a public health emergency;

Risks Related to Our Business and Operations

any changes in the funding, financial viability or our relationships with our payors;
delays in collection, or non-collection, of our accounts receivable, particularly during any business integration;
an impairment of our goodwill and long-lived assets;
any failure to maintain or to develop reliable, efficient and secure information technology systems;
an inability to attract and retain qualified employees;
any acquisition or acquisition integration efforts;
weakening of general economic conditions in the markets in which we do business, including the impact of inflationary pressures, rising interest rates, labor shortages, higher labor costs, and supply chain challenges;
estimated income taxes being different from income taxes that we ultimately pay; and
pandemics, and other infectious diseases, including the COVID-19 pandemic;

Risks Related to Our NEMT Segment

our contracts not surviving until the end of their stated terms, or not being renewed or extended;
our failure to compete effectively in the marketplace;
our not being awarded contracts through the government’s requests for proposals process, or our awarded contracts not being profitable;
any failure to satisfy our contractual obligations or to maintain existing pledged performance and payment bonds;
a failure to estimate accurately the cost of performing our contracts;
any misclassification of the drivers we engage as independent contractors rather than as employees; and
significant interruptions in our communication and data services;

Risks Related to Our PCS Segment

not successfully executing on our strategies in the face of our competition;
any inability to maintain relationships with existing patient referral sources;
certificates of need, or CON, laws or other regulatory and licensure obligations that may adversely affect our personal care integration efforts and expansion into new markets;
any failure to obtain the consent of the New York Department of Health to manage the day to day operations of our licensed in-home personal care services agency business;
changes in the case-mix of our personal care patients, or changes in payor mix or payment methodologies;
our loss of existing favorable managed care contracts;
our experiencing labor shortages in qualified employees and management;
labor disputes or disruptions, in particular in New York; and
becoming subject to malpractice, professional negligence or other similar claims;


5


Risks Related to Our RPM Segment

our operating in the competitive remote patient monitoring industry, and failing to develop and enhance related technology applications; and
any failure to innovate and provide services that are useful to customers and to achieve and maintain market acceptance;

Risks Related to Our Corporate and Other Segment

our lack of sole decision-making authority with respect to our minority investment in Matrix and any failure by Matrix to achieve positive financial position and results of operations;
our investment in innovation includes the provision of virtual clinical care management services ("MSO") through an unaffiliated professional corporation ("PC") owned and operated by a licensed physician and our relationships or arrangements with the PC could become subject to legal challenges;
the MSO, the PC, and medical practitioners providing virtual clinical care services may become subject to medical liability claims;
any failure to comply with applicable data interoperability and information blocking rules; and
failure for telehealth flexibilities currently permitted under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 to be extended, which would limit our ability for new patient encounters to occur;

Risks Related to Governmental Regulations

the cost of our compliance or non-compliance with existing laws;
changes to the regulatory landscape applicable to our businesses including the proposed ruling by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") titled Ensuring Access to Medicaid Services;
a loss of Medicaid coverage by a significant number of Medicaid beneficiaries as a result of the restart of the Medicaid eligibility redetermination process following the expiration of continuous coverage requirements under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (2020);
changes in budgetary priorities of the government entities or private insurance programs that fund our services;
regulations relating to privacy and security of patient and service user information;
actions for false claims or recoupment of funds;
civil penalties or loss of business for failing to comply with bribery, corruption and other regulations governing business with public organizations;
increasing scrutiny and changing expectations with respect to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters may impose additional costs on us, impact our access to capital, or expose us to new or additional risks;
changes to, or violations of, licensing regulations, including regulations governing surveys and audits; and
our contracts being subject to audit and modification by the payors with whom we contract, at their sole discretion;

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness and Economic Conditions

our existing debt agreements containing financial covenants and cross-default provisions that limit our flexibility in operating our business;
our substantial indebtedness and lease obligations and ability to generate sufficient cash to service our indebtedness;
any expiration of our New Credit Agreement (as defined below) or loss of available financing alternatives; and
our ability to incur substantial additional indebtedness;

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

the results of the remediation of our identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting;
future sales of shares of our common stock by existing stockholders;
our stock price volatility;
our dependence on our subsidiaries to fund our operations and expenses;
securities analysts failing to publish research or publishing misleading or unfavorable research about us; and
anti-takeover provisions could discourage a change of control of our company and affect the trading price of our stock.

The foregoing risk factors are not necessarily all of the factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from expectations. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could harm our results. Investors and other interested parties are encouraged to read the information included under the section captioned “Risk
6


Factors” below, which describes other risk factors not summarized above, in its entirety before making an investment decision about our securities.


Item 1.Business.
Overview

ModivCare Inc. ("ModivCare" or the "Company") is a technology-enabled healthcare services incompany that provides a suite of integrated supportive care solutions for public and private payors and their members. Its value-based solutions address the United Statessocial determinants of health ("SDoH") by connecting members to essential care services. By doing so, ModivCare helps health plans manage risks, reduce costs, and workforce development services internationally. The subsidiaries and other investments in which we hold interests comprise the following segments:

Non-Emergency Transportation Services (“NET Services”) – Nationwide managerimprove health outcomes. ModivCare is a provider of non-emergency medical transportation (“NET”("NEMT") programs for state governments, personal care services ("PCS"), and managedremote patient monitoring solutions ("RPM"), which serve similar, highly vulnerable patient populations. The technology-enabled operating model in its NEMT segment includes the coordination of non-emergency medical transportation services supported by an infrastructure of core competencies in risk underwriting, contact center management, network credentialing, and claims management. Additionally, services provided in its PCS segment include placements of non-medical personal care organizations.assistants, home health aides and nurses primarily to Medicaid patient populations in need of care monitoring and assistance performing daily living activities in the home setting. ModivCare’s remote patient monitoring solutions in its RPM segment include the monitoring of personal emergency response systems ("PERS"), vitals monitoring, medication management and data-driven patient engagement solutions.
Workforce Development Services (“WD Services”) – Global provider of employment preparation and placement services, legal offender rehabilitation services, youth community service programs and certain health related services to eligible participants of government sponsored programs.
Matrix Investment – MinorityModivCare also holds a 43.6% minority interest in CCHN Group Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which operates under the Matrix Medical Network brand (“Matrix”). Matrix, which is included in its Corporate and Other segment, maintains a national network of community-based clinicians who deliver in-home and on-site services.

Our Development

ModivCare Inc. is a Delaware corporation that was formed in 1996. The Company completed its initial public offering, or IPO, of its common stock in August 2003 and its shares have been listed for trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market, or NASDAQ, since its IPO. ModivCare’s shares of common stock currently trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker symbol “MODV”.

ModivCare has grown its business since its IPO into the company it is today through organic growth as well as a series of acquisitions and divestitures of companies operating primarily in related, or tangentially related, industries, as follows, with respect to its continuing operations:

In December 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding equity of Charter LCI Corporation, the parent company of LogistiCare, Inc. (now ModivCare Solutions, LLC), which formed the foundation of our NEMT business and NEMT segment operations, for cash and 418,952 shares of our common stock totaling approximately $220.0 million;
In October 2014, we acquired all of the outstanding equity of Matrix for cash and common stock totaling approximately $390.7 million, and subsequently in October 2016, affiliates of Frazier Healthcare Partners (Frazier) obtained a 53.2% majority interest in Matrix through a stock subscription, and we received a distribution from Matrix totaling approximately $381.2 million;
In September 2018, we acquired all of the outstanding equity not already owned by us of Circulation, Inc., which extended our business to include an NEMT technology platform that allows for real time notifications to members on their mobile devices, integration with a wide variety of advanced traffic management systems, or ATMS, and transportation network companies, real time ride tracking, network management and analytics, for cash totaling approximately $45.1 million;
In May 2020, we acquired all of the outstanding equity of National MedTrans, LLC, or NMT, which expanded our NEMT business to include more than five million trips to its approximately two million members on behalf of state Medicaid agencies and Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) across 12 states, for cash totaling approximately $80.0 million;
In November 2020, we acquired all of the outstanding equity of OEP AM, Inc., a nationwide providerDelaware corporation doing business as Simplura Health Group, or Simplura, which formed the foundation of in-homeour personal care optimizationbusiness and PCS segment operations, for cash totaling approximately $575.0 million subject to customary adjustments;
In May 2021, we acquired the transportation management solutions, including comprehensive health assessments (“CHAs”),software WellRyde from nuVizz which increased the Company's technology platform for its NEMT network, for cash totaling approximately $12.0 million;
7


In September 2021, we acquired all of the outstanding equity of Care Finders Total Care, or Care Finders, which added to membersour existing PCS segment operations, for cash totaling approximately $340.0 million subject to customary adjustments;
In September 2021, we acquired all of managed care organizations, accountedthe outstanding equity of VRI Intermediate Holdings, LLC, or VRI, which formed the foundation of our remote patient monitoring business and RPM segment operations, for ascash totaling approximately $315.0 million subject to customary adjustments;
In May 2022, we acquired all of the outstanding equity of Guardian Medical Monitoring, or GMM, which expanded our remote patient monitoring business and RPM segment operations, for cash totaling approximately $71.3 million subject to customary adjustments;
In May 2022, we acquired customer contracts from an equity method investment. On February 16, 2018, Matrixentity in the PCS segment, which expanded our PCS segment operations, for cash totaling approximately $7.6 million subject to customary adjustments; and
In March 2023, we acquired HealthFair, expanding its service offerings to include mobile health assessments, advanced diagnostic testing, and additional care optimization services.
In addition to its segments’ operations,developed technology in the Corporate and Other segment, includeswhich was an investment in innovation related to our data analytics capabilities;

and, as follows, with respect to our divestitures:

In November 2015, we sold to Molina Healthcare, Inc. our operations comprising our former human services segment, which provided counselors, social workers and behavioral health professionals to work with clients, primarily in the clients’ homes or communities, who were eligible for government assistance due to income level, disabilities or court order, for cash totaling approximately $200.0 million; and
In three separate transactions effected in October 2017, July 2018 and December 2018, we ultimately sold to three separate and unaffiliated entities substantially all of our operations comprising our former workforce development services, or WD Services, segment, which provided workforce development services to long-term unemployed, disabled, and unskilled individuals, as well as individuals coping with medical illnesses and those that had been released from incarceration, for cash totaling approximately $15.8 million, a de minimus amount, and $46.5 million, respectively.

In addition to the acquisition and divestiture activities described above, the Company:

In January 2019, completed an organizational consolidation in which it closed its corporate offices in Stamford, Connecticut and Tucson, Arizona, and consolidated all activities and functions performed at the corporate holding company level into its NEMT segment;
In June and September 2020, effected a series of transactions pursuant to an agreement with Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P. and/or funds and accounts managed by Coliseum Capital Management, LLC (collectively, the “Coliseum Stockholders”) in which (1) the Company repurchased approximately half of the shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Coliseum Stockholders, and (2) the Coliseum Stockholders converted the remaining portion of their holdings of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock into Common Stock for aggregate consideration of $88.7 million; following the September repurchase of the Coliseum Stockholders’ remaining shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company elected to convert all shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock held by holders other than the Coliseum Stockholders into Common Stock, thereby eliminating all outstanding shares of our preferred stock;
In November 2020, issued $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.875% Senior Unsecured Notes due in November 2025, which we refer to as our Notes due 2025, the net proceeds from which were used to finance a portion of the purchase price paid in the Simplura acquisition;
In December 2020, formed with an industry counterpart a protected series (90% of which is owned by us and which we refer to herein as our insurance captive) of a captive insurance company, NEMT Insurance DE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that has been organized subject to the Delaware Revised Captive Insurance Company Act, which has been established to provide an insurance coverage alternative for transportation providers to obtain required automobile insurance in connection with their NEMT services;
In August 2021, issued $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.000% Senior Unsecured Notes due in October 2029, which we refer to as our Notes due 2029, the net proceeds from which were used to finance a portion of the purchase price paid in the VRI Intermediate Holdings, LLC acquisition
In May and October 2020 and September 2021, further amended its amended and restated credit and guaranty agreement dated as of August 2, 2013 (as amended, the “Old Credit Agreement”), to, among other things, increase to $225.0 million the revolving credit limit under the Old Credit Agreement, permit the issuance of our Notes described above, extend the maturity date of the Old Credit Agreement to August 2, 2023, permit the incurrence of additional debt to finance our recent acquisitions, and revise financial covenants to permit the consummation of the acquisitions;
On January 1, 2022, completed a segment reorganization that resulted in the addition of a Corporate and Other segment that comprises the costs associated with the Company’s corporate operations, including activities at its corporate office that include related to
8


executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal public reporting, certainand specific strategic and corporate development functions andfor each segment, as well as the results of the Company’s captive insurance company. We are actively monitoring these activities as they relateMatrix investment;
In February 2022, replaced its Old Credit Facility with a New Credit Facility, which provides for a five-year senior secured revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $325.0 million, sublimits for swingline loans of up to our capital allocation$25.0 million, letters of credit of up to $60.0 million and acquisition strategyalternative currency loans in amounts of up to ensure alignment with Providence’s overall strategic objectives$75.0 million; and
In June 2023, amended its goal of enhancing shareholder value.New Credit Facility to amend and restate the maximum permitted Total Net Leverage Ratio under the New Credit Agreement, which was further amended in February 2024.

The Company isOur Strategies

ModivCare has grown from a Delaware corporation formed in 1996 and headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut.


Business Strategies

Our businesses are operated on a decentralized basis and do not share any integrated functions such as sales, marketing, purchasing, human resources, accounting, finance or legal. They pursue strategies reflective of their respective industries and operating models. Our segments’ core competencies include developing and managing large provider networks, tailoring healthcare and workforce development service offerings to the unique needs of diverse communities and populations, and implementing technology-enabled delivery models to achieve superior outcomes in low cost settings. We pursue both organic and inorganic growth through entry into adjacent markets and complementary service lines, particularly with offerings that may leverage the advantages inherent in our large-scale, technology-enabled, networks. In particular, as it relates to inorganic growth, we are actively evaluating the optimal industry sectors, such as thestand-alone non-emergency medical transportation industryprovider to a company with a comprehensive supportive care platform focused on SDoH. Our services include non-emergency medical transportation, personal care services and othersremote patient monitoring solutions. Throughout this expansion, our strategy has evolved toward a vision of One ModivCare. This strategic framework emphasizes our focus on alignment across all of our supportive care services. By adhering to this strategy, we aim to cultivate best practices, achieve operational scalability and efficiencies, and standardize processes to ensure an optimal experience for both our members and customers. ModivCare is focused on aligning our people, processes, and technology for each business segment while integrating data across our point solutions to better serve our members and customers.

ModivCare is focused on execution, growth, and results. To highlight a couple of strategic initiatives in our business segments:

NEMT – our transportation network is selected using a partnership model with credentialed transportation providers to ensure we provide our members with high quality service and on-time performance. Our multi-modal strategy ensures that members receive the most appropriate type of ride, whether it is a traditional sedan, ride share, public transit, or a family member driving the member and receiving mileage reimbursement. Our focus is to make sure our members have the best transportation experience tailored to their individualized transportation needs. Over the last year, our NEMT segment has undergone a transformation to drive operational efficiencies and optimize performance, which businesses complementaryis driven by our omnichannel member engagement model, the multi-modal network strategy, and digital customer integration.

PCS – our personal care team remains focused on transforming its operations through centralizing and standardizing non-clinical functions and certain operational processes across our network of personal care offices. This strategy will empower and enable caregivers to focus on providing high quality services to members and minimize the time spent on administrative functions and expand our workforce development to improve recruiting and retention efforts. This operational transformation in PCS coupled with the recruiting and retention efforts deployed to enhance our caregiver engagement will drive growth and ensure increased member satisfaction.

RPM – our RPM team is focused on gaining market share through referral sales growth and strengthening our long-standing relationships with managed care organizations. We are continuing to innovate and invest in technology and comprehensive data analytics to advance our position as a leader in the remote patient monitoring industry.

Technology Enhancements

As a leading provider of non-emergency medical transportation, we believe that transportation related to care is one of the most impactful experiences contributing to our NET Services business operate, around which to focus our merger and acquisition activity. This ongoing evaluation takes into consideration and balances a number of factors, includingmembers’ satisfaction during their care encounter. At the strategic goals, competitive landscape, and growth opportunitiescore of our current segments,operational and technological strategies is a focus on driving member satisfaction and enhancing our technological capabilities to support this experience. Our technology solutions continue to improve our member experience by providing real-time visibility into trip status, optimized trip routing, and automated trip assignments and billing. Our technology platform and continued technological enhancements reduce inbound calls from members that require assistance identifying the location of the transportation provider, improve on-time performance, and reduce costs while increasing efficiency and member satisfaction. Specifically, our platform and continuous investment in an attempt to direct our capital towards those areas of our business most likely to drive long-term value creation and generate the highest levels of return for our shareholders. We also may enter into strategic partnerships or dispose of businesses, as demonstrated by the Matrix Transaction (defined below) and the Human Services Sale (defined below), based on a variety of factors, including availability of alternative opportunities to deploy capital or otherwise maximize shareholder valuetechnology improvements, as well as other strategic considerations. The outcome of our active evaluation of the optimal industry sectors around which to focus our mergerdigital customer integration, provide opportunities for revenue growth and acquisition activityreduced costs as well as the potential future entryfollowing additional benefits:

member communications through texting, email and automated calls, including the ability for the member to see the location of the transportation provider in real time on a mobile device;
optimized routing from industry-leading technology software;
automated trip assignments allowing for proactive management for rejected, canceled and late rides;
9


automated billing allowing for more precise and timely mileage logs and service outcomes; and
driver application enhancements for transportation providers.

With respect to our PCS segment, process improvements, augmented by technology, are expected to help reduce costs while maintaining quality and compliant patient care. In addition, we strive to become the employer of choice in each of our PCS segment markets. Our scale and density in these markets allow us to provide the number of weekly work hours our caregivers desire, which gives us a competitive advantage in recruitment and retention of caregivers that might otherwise need to work for several agencies to obtain the desired number of work hours.

With respect to the RPM segment, the suite of technology-enabled in-home solutions provides improved patient outcomes with peace-of-mind support and reduced costs to payers which drives value and deepens our engagement with members. Greater access to real time information, enabled through our technology and monitoring devices, provides us the ability to shorten cycle times to help identify and resolve client and member issues.

Organic Growth

NEMT Segment. Across the healthcare market, we see an increasing understanding of the benefit of removing transportation as a barrier to care and a way to improve other determinants of health, such as access to food, shelter, socialization, and medication. We believe that our scale, deep experience, operational strategy, and technology tools uniquely position us to address member needs related to access to transportation for vulnerable populations. We approach sales, marketing and business development in a manner that is focused on driving market share in our core Medicaid market, including states and MCOs, Medicare Advantage plans, health systems and providers. Simultaneously, we target business development efforts with partners to enter new transportation markets, including the movement of home health providers, pharmacy delivery and beneficiaries of workers compensation. We expect there will be network effects as we serve more and more healthcare constituencies within a geography.

PCS Segment. We intend to continue to grow in our existing markets for personal care services by:

increasing recruiting and expanding our caregiver workforce;
developing and retaining our caregivers;
delivering consistent and reliable quality of care;
leveraging and expanding existing payor and referral source relationships; and
strategic de novo sites to increase density and scale.

Our business development activities in this area include community outreach in each of our markets, where we educate referral sources about the benefits of personal care services and the programs available to patients. We believe that demographic trends such as an aging population and longer life expectancies will increase the size of our addressable market, and that the demand for in-home personal care will further increase because it is the lowest cost healthcare setting and therefore preferred by payors and also by patients, who also tend to prefer to receive care in their own homes over institutional settings. We also believe that the carve-in of personal care into strategic partnershipsMedicare Advantage plans provides further opportunity for organic growth. As one of the largest platforms providing in-home personal care, we differentiate our services by providing broad geographic coverage in both urban and rural areas and the capability to offer a broad suite of services and manage complex cases involving high-needs patients. In addition, we are working with MCOs and other payors to lower the overall cost of care and improve outcomes by managing risk factors, such as falls, and using technology solutions to provide early indicators of change in condition to avoid hospitalization. With these capabilities, we strive to be the provider of choice for in-home personal care services and intend to continue differentiating our services from the competition and winning market share by relying on strong regional leadership, clinical capabilities, qualified and well-trained caregivers and investment in technology.

RPM Segment. We see the opportunity for remote patient monitoring services, which include personal emergency response systems, vitals monitoring, medication adherence solutions, and integrated data reporting and analytics, to provide an alternative to costly existing healthcare services, which can be obtained in the safety and comfort of our members' homes. We believe that there is a natural untapped market with considerable growth opportunities that we can reach by cross-selling into our existing relationships with Medicaid and Medicare Advantage plans and marketing the reduced cost of providing coverage for remote monitoring solutions while also resulting in improved patient outcomes and enhanced patient engagement and experience. Further, we believe that demographic trends such as the aging population and increasing prevalence of chronic illness increase the addressable market to support patients that demand in-home solutions where they are able to maintain their independence and avoid long-term care facilities, preventable emergency room use, hospitalization, and hospital readmission. Along with the demographic trends,
10


structural changes in the healthcare industry driven by the pandemic have accelerated the shift to virtual healthcare solutions and highlighted the efficiencies and cost effectiveness of providing virtual health solutions. By addressing this sizable market that is expected to increase with the shift in the demographic trends and structural changes in the industry toward value-based solutions, we also see an opportunity to address additional payors in order to provide awareness of the benefits of remote monitoring solutions in order to expand the number of payors that offer coverage for this solution and expand our geographic span as we strive to be the provider of choice for remote patient monitoring services.

Inorganic Growth

NEMT Segment. We believe our experience, relationships in the industry, scale and executive team strongly position us to be a consolidator in healthcare transportation. Our acquisition strategy may include an evaluation of new entrants, which may not be able to otherwise compete without the benefits of scale and experience, and closely-held businesses that may seek a new capital structure or potential dispositionsale to achieve liquidity for founders. With our strong team and track record, we believe we are a natural consolidator.

PCS Segment. We believe there is a significant opportunity for continued growth through acquisition in both new and existing personal care services markets. The personal care services industry is highly fragmented, and smaller competitors are finding it increasingly difficult to compete as payors look to narrow their provider networks and contract with providers of businessesscale that can offer a wide breadth of services and capabilities across a broad geographic area. Moreover, smaller competitors may impactnot have the extentcapital to invest in technology and mannerlack the market density to attract caregivers. We will continue to explore opportunities to acquire regional providers to enter into new markets, and tuck-in acquisitions to grow our presence in existing markets, as well as to branch out into adjacent businesses.

RPM Segment. We believe there are opportunities for growth through acquisitions in the remote patient monitoring market. The remote patient monitoring industry is highly fragmented, and we believe that our scale and healthcare-centric platform provide us with the ability to acquire companies in new markets and regions and expand our breadth of operations. Technological innovation is also a critical component of the industry’s growth. We believe that our technology agnostic platform allows us to efficiently acquire companies that offer newer technologies and service offerings that we can leverage to accelerate our existing technology and offerings. We will continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities in the RPM segment to supplement our growth going forward.

Strategic Capital Allocation

We seek to manage and allocate capital in a way that creates value and supports the execution of our business strategy. The operations of our respective business segments contribute the primary source of capital to the Company supplemented by any issuances by the Company in the capital markets. Our NEMT segment has continued to generate strong revenue growth for the Company. Further, our PCS segment has shown consistent revenue growth and maintains an asset-light model. Our RPM segment has also contributed to our continued growth with a strong profit margin. With all of our segments operating collectively, our combined balance sheet provides us with optionality with respect to capital allocation and how we can best deliver stockholder value. We will continue to focus on operational efficiencies by investing in platforms that streamline our operations and seek to enhance our technical capabilities through technological initiatives in an effort to enhance our client and member experience. With respect to our PCS segment, we are committed to maintaining and improving the quality of our member care by dedicating appropriate resources at each site and continuing to refine our clinical and non-clinical initiatives and objectives. We are implementing technology enhancements and service protocols intended to promote best practices, enhance the member experience, and improve the operating effectiveness and efficiency of our case management, training, staffing, scheduling and labor management. We will also continue to assess the opportunities for capital deployment in order to create value for stockholders, which may include dividends, share repurchases and acquisitions.

Our Operations

We are a technology-enabled, healthcare services company that is the nation’s largest manager of non-emergency medical transportation programs for state governments and MCOs, a leading in-home personal care services provider in the seven eastern states where we provide those services, and a leading provider of remote patient monitoring and medication management solutions. Our core competencies in NEMT include contact center management, network credentialing, claims management and non-emergency medical transport management. Our in-home personal care services include placements of non-medical personal care assistants, home health aides and skilled nurses primarily to Medicaid patient populations in need of care monitoring and assistance performing daily living activities, including senior citizens and disabled adults. Our RPM
11


services include provision of personal emergency response systems, vitals monitoring, medication management, and data-driven patient engagement solutions.

By offering our suite of integrated supportive care solutions for our payors and members, we are focused on becoming among the nation’s preeminent SDoH companies and delivering better care in the home, enhancing patient lives, and reducing healthcare costs. We report our operations as described above under four separate business segments: NEMT; PCS; RPM; and Corporate and Other, each of which is described below in greater detail following the next subsection captioned “Business Trends”.

Business Trends

Our performance is affected by a number of trends that drive the demand for our services. In particular, the markets in which we deploy resources across Providence,operate are exposed to various trends, such as healthcare industry and demographic dynamics. Over the long term, we believe there are numerous factors that could affect growth within the industries in which we operate, including:

an aging population, which is expected to increase demand for healthcare services including strategicrequired transportation to such healthcare services and administrative resources between Corporatein-home personal care and Otherremote patient monitoring services;
increasing prevalence of chronic illnesses that require active and our operating segments.ongoing monitoring of health data which can be accomplished at a lower cost and result in better health outcomes through remote patient monitoring services;
a movement towards value-based care versus fee-for-service and cost plus care and budget pressure on governments, both of which may increase the use of private corporations to provide necessary and innovative services;
Discontinued Operationsincreasing demand for in-home care provision, driven by cost pressures on traditional reimbursement models and technological advances enabling remote engagement, including remote monitoring and similar internet-based health related services;

On October 19, 2016, affiliates of Frazier Healthcare Partners purchased a controlling equity interestshift in Matrix, with Providence retaining a noncontrolling equity interest (the “Matrix Transaction”). Matrix’s financial results prior to October 19, 2016 are presentedmembership dynamics as a discontinued operation.result of Medicaid redetermination efforts, which may decrease membership levels at our NEMT segment;
advancement of regulatory priorities, which include the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") proposed rule, Ensuring Access to Medicaid Services, which may lower profit margins at our PCS segment;
technological advancements, which may be utilized by us to improve services and lower costs, but may also be utilized by others, which may increase industry competitiveness;
MCO, Medicaid and Medicare plans increasing coverage of non-emergency medical transportation services for a variety of reasons, including increased access to care, improved patient compliance with treatment plans, social trends, and to promote SDoH, and this trend may be accelerated or reinforced by The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 ("H.R.133"), a component of which mandates that state Medicaid programs ensure that Medicaid beneficiaries have necessary transportation to and from health care providers; and
uncertain macroeconomic conditions, including rising inflation and interest rates, could have an effect on our debt and short-term borrowings, which may have a negative impact on our results.

Major changes in the composition of the United States population will continue to drive an increase in demand for all health-related services, including non-emergency medical transportation, in-home personal care, and remote patient monitoring. These demographic shifts include, but are not limited to, an aging U.S. population, increased life expectancy, increased prevalence of chronic health conditions, and patients' preference to receive home-based care. The population of individuals aged 65 years and older nationally has been consistently growing and the U.S. Census Bureau estimates that starting in 2030, when all baby boomers will be older than 65 years, Americans 65 years and older will make up 20.6% of the population. Presently, Americans 65 years and older are estimated to make up 18.1% of the population. Concurrently, 60.0% of adults in the U.S. have one reported chronic health condition with 40.0% of adults in the U.S. reporting two or more. Chronic disease is a disease that is persistent or long-lasting and includes heart disease, cancer, and diabetes which are the leading causes of death and disability in the United States. With the increasing population of Americans aged 65 and older and the significant increase in the occurrence of chronic diseases, for which elderly patients are more prone to contracting, demand for lower-cost solutions in lieu of costly doctor visits and institutional care will continue to grow.

This demographic shift will continue to drive an increase in demand for transportation services from this vulnerable population. Each year, millions of members are estimated to miss out on medical care due to lack of transportation. Non-emergency medical transportation solutions enable access to care that not only improves the quality of life and health of the patients receiving services, but also enable many of the individuals to pursue independent living in their homes rather than in more expensive institutional care settings. In addition, on November 1, 2015,studies have shown that missed medical appointments disrupt ongoing patient care plans which can lead to delayed care and increased emergency room visits as well as unresolved medical problems. Moreover, providing access to healthcare transportation services allows patients to utilize preventive care solutions to identify and mitigate health risks at earlier intervals which can lower the Company completed its salecost of overall care by avoiding potentially more serious, costly
12


emergency services at the onset of a health condition. In our NEMT segment, we specialize in offering services tailored to individuals with specific transportation needs. To ensure the highest standards of service, we complete the credentialing process for our transportation providers well before any service is rendered. This proactive approach ensures that we accurately match each member with a transportation provider that best suits their unique requirements, guaranteeing a seamless experience. Members are thus assured of receiving personalized service, with their sole responsibility being to initiate the scheduling of their ride.

The U.S. personal care services market also benefits from the strong demographic trends of the Human Services Segment (the “Human Services Sale”),aging U.S. population, increased life expectancy, and a shift toward value-based care, which is accountedmoving care away from more expensive institutional settings and into the preferred setting of the individuals' home. Personal care services are a significant component of home and community-based services, which have grown in significance and demand in recent years. Many consumers in this segment need services on a long-term basis to address chronic conditions. Payors establish their own eligibility standards, determine the type, amount, duration and scope of services, and establish the applicable reimbursement rate in accordance with applicable law, regulations or contracts. By providing services in the home to members who require long-term care and support with the activities of daily living, personal care service providers lower the cost of treatment by delaying or eliminating the need for care in more expensive settings, such as nursing homes and long-term rehabilitation facilities. In addition, caregivers observe and report changes in the condition of patients for the purpose of facilitating early intervention in the disease progression, which often reduces the cost of medical services by preventing unnecessary emergency room visits and/or hospital admissions and re-admissions. By providing care in the preferred setting of the home and by providing opportunities to improve the patient’s conditions and allow early intervention, personal care also is designed to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.

The personal care services industry developed in a highly fragmented manner, with few large participants and many small ones. Few companies have a significant market share across multiple regions or states. We expect ongoing consolidation within the industry, driven by the desire of payors to narrow their networks of service providers, and as a discontinued operationresult of the industry’s increasingly complex regulatory, operating and technology requirements. We believe we are well positioned to capitalize on a consolidating industry given our reputation in the market, strong payor relationships and integration of technology into our business model.

The remote patient monitoring services market also supports the shift toward value-based care as it provides patient self-management and care management operations which support and enable seniors, the chronically ill, and persons with disabilities to maintain their independence and avoid long-term care facilities, preventable emergency room use, hospitalization, and hospital readmission. With the increasing population of Americans 65 and older and the significant increase in the occurrence of chronic diseases, for all periods presented.which elderly patients are more prone to contracting, demand for at-home care solutions in lieu of costly doctor visits and institutional care will continue to grow. This is further driven by structural changes that have occurred in the healthcare industry as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic toward virtual healthcare solutions. As remote patient monitoring has continued to grow in popularity, this has supported the underlying trend showing increased desire of seniors and individuals to "age-in-place" while also receiving a comparable standard of care.


DescriptionRemote patient monitoring also provides the ability to leverage the data analytics obtained in order to produce actionable insights to drive proactive patient interventions which are especially valuable given the growing occurrence of Our Segmentschronic illness, as discussed above. These conditions require ongoing and active management and the use of remote monitoring solutions can work to manage symptoms and keep costs for individuals lower in the long-term. Remote monitoring services allow patients to monitor symptoms from home which decreases the strain on hospitals that have capacity constraints and ensures continued care and interaction with patients. This tech-enabled healthcare solution is covered by Medicare, Medicaid, and many private insurers that set eligibility criteria and establish reimbursement rates in accordance with applicable law, regulations or contracts and has gained significant traction during the COVID-19 pandemic where patients and providers were able to experience the value of remote health solutions while increasing patient experience and retention. This solution has many facets and we believe we are well positioned as the preeminent leader in providing solutions to address the social determinants of health that will work in tandem to increase payor and member value across our holistic suite of solutions.


The Company operates in two principal business segments, NET Services and WD Services. In addition, Providence holds a noncontrolling interest in Matrix, which is a reportable segment for financial reporting purposes (the “Matrix Investment”). Financial information about segments and geographic areas, including revenues, operating income (loss), and long-lived assets of each segment, is included in Note 21, Segments, to our consolidated financial statements and is incorporated herein by reference. See Item 1A, Risk Factors, for a discussion of risks related to our operations and investments.NEMT Segment

NET Services
Services offered. NET Services providesWe provide non-emergency medical transportation solutions to clientsour members after obtaining contracts with our third-party payor relationships, including state governments, MCOs and health systems, in 3848 states and the District of Columbia. As of December 31, 2017,2023, approximately 23.632.9 million individualsmembers were eligible to receive our transportation services, and during 2017, NET Servicesin 2023, we managed 66.8approximately 34.6 million verified paid trips. For 2017, 2016 and 2015, NET Services accounted for 81.2%, 78.2% and 73.3%, respectively, of Providence’s consolidated service revenue, net.

NET ServicesWe primarily contractscontract with state Medicaid programs and managed care organizations (“MCOs” and collectively “NET customers”)MCOs, including Medicare Advantage plans, for the coordination of their members’ (“NET end-users”), who are our “end-users”, non-emergency medical transportation needs. NET end-usersOur customers are
13


typically Medicaid or Medicare eligible members, whose limited mobility or financial resources hindershinder their ability to access necessary healthcare and social services. We believe our transportation services enable access to care, as well as access to meals, shelter, socialization, and the pharmacy, that not only improvesimprove the quality of life and health of the populations we serve, but also enables many of the individuals we serve to pursue independent living in their homes rather than in more expensive institutional care settings. We provide access to non-emergency medical transportation services on a more cost-effective basis than self-administered state Medicaid or MCO transportation programs while improving the lives and health outcomes of the populations we serve.
NET Services program delivery is dependent upon a highly-integrated technology platform and business process as well as the management of a multifaceted network of subcontracted transportation providers. Our technology platform is purpose-built for the unique needs of our industry and is highly scalable, capable of supporting substantial growth in our clients’ current and future membership base. In addition, our technology platform efficiently provides a broad interconnectivity among NET end-users, NET customers, and our network of transportation providers. We believe this technological capability and our industry experience uniquely position us as a future focal point in the evolving healthcare industry to introduce valuable population insights. In 2016 and 2017, we introduced service offerings and new technological features for NET end-users to improve service levels, lower costs and build the foundation for additional data analytics capabilities.



To fulfill the transportation needs of NET end-users,our customers, we apply our proprietary technology platform to an extensive network of approximately 5,1003,700 transportation resources. This includes our in-network roster of fully contracted third-party transportation providers who operate sedans, wheelchair equipped vehicles, multi-passenger vans and ambulances. Our system also utilizes partnershipsrelationships with on-demand transportation network companies, mass transit entities, mileage reimbursement programs, taxis and county-based emergency medical service providers. To promote safety, quality and compliance, our in-networkin‑network transportation providers undergo an in-depth credentialing and education process. Our proprietary technology platform is designed to connect with our external partners’ application program interfaces to improve on-time and on-demand performance, provide real time information and analytics (including live vehicle location data), minimize cancellations and better allow for the scale required to provide an effective, nationwide service.


Our transportation management services also include fraud, waste, and abuse prevention and identification through utilization review programs designed to monitor that our transportation services are provided in compliance with Medicaid and Medicare program rules and regulations as well as to remediate issues that are identified. Compliance controls include ongoing monitoring, auditing and remediation efforts, such as validating NET end-user eligibility for the requested date of service and employing a series of gatekeeping questions to checkverify that the treatment type is covered and the appropriate mode of transportation is assigned. We also conduct post-trip confirmations of attendance directly with the healthcare providers for certain repetitive trips, and we employ field monitors to inspect transportation provider vehicles and to observe some transports in real time. Our claims validation process generally limits payment to trips that are properly documented, have been authorized in advance, and are billed at the pre-trip estimated amount. Our claims process is increasingly digital, which provides more protection to member protected health information and reduces the impact on the environment. Transportation providers are able to submit their bills and supporting documentation directly to us through a secured web portal.

In 2016, NET Services launched a strategic initiative to enhance client and member satisfaction and drive greater operational efficiencies. This initiative focuses on developing and deploying new processes and technologies needed to: progress towards an industry-leading call center and reservation scheduling platform; improve member communication, accessibility, and satisfaction; optimize the utilization of our extensive network of transportation providers; and build the foundation for additional analytical capabilities. Implementations under this strategic initiative that were completed in 2017 include new workforce management tools aimed at streamlining our call center operations and decreasing payroll costs, tools and models to better monitor transportation provider performance and capacity availability, and rate setting protocols aimed at lowering transportation costs and improving service quality. The full implementation of the initiative is expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2018.
Revenue andcustomers. In 2017, contracts with state Medicaid agencies and MCOs represented 55.9% and 44.1%, respectively, of NET Services’ revenue. NET Services derived 13.8%, 13.1% and 15.0% of its revenue from a single state Medicaid agency for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The next four largest NET Services customers in the aggregate comprised 22.3%, 22.6% and 24.2% of NET Services’ revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Contracts with state Medicaid agencies are typically for three to five years with multiple renewal options. Contracts with MCOs continue until terminated by either party upon reasonable notice (as determined in accordance with the contract),terms of the contract and allow for regular price adjustments based upon utilization and transportation cost. As of December 31, 2017, 30.8%2023, 32.3% of NET ServicesNEMT segment revenue was generated under state Medicaid contracts that are subject to renewal within the next 12 months. In 2017, NET Services renewedWhile we typically expect to renew these contracts representing 29.5%as they approach their term, we may receive notice from customers that they are terminating or not renewing their contracts upon expiration.

The NEMT segment generated 85.3% of its revenue in such year, including its contract with the New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services, to provide non-emergency medical transportation management services to Medicaid-eligible New Jersey residents.
77.9% of NET Services’ revenue in 2017 was generated2023 under capitated contracts. Under capitated contracts, where wepayors pay a fixed amount per eligible member. We assume the responsibility of meeting the covered healthcare related transportation requirements of a specific population based on per-member per-month fees for the number of eligible members in the customer’s program. Revenue is recognized based on the population served during the period. Under certainCertain capitated contracts partialhave provisions for reconciliations, risk corridors or profit rebates. For contracts with reconciliation provisions, capitation payment is received as a prepayment during the month service is provided. These partial paymentsprepayments are periodically reconciled based on actual cost and/or trip volume and may be due backresult in refunds to the customer, or additional payments due from the customer. Contracts with risk corridor or profit rebate provisions allow for profit within a certain corridor and once we reach profit level thresholds or maximums, we discontinue recognizing revenue and instead record a liability within the accrued contract payable account. This liability may be due toreduced through future increases in trip volume or periodic settlements with the customer. While a profit rebate provision could only result in a liability from this profit threshold, a risk corridor provision could potentially result in receivables if the Company after eachdoes not reach certain profit minimums, which would be recorded in the reconciliation period, based on a reconciliationcontract receivables account.

The remaining 14.7% of actual utilization and cost compared to the prepayment made. 22.1% of NET Services’NEMT segment revenue was generated under other types of fee arrangements, including administrative services only fee for service (“FFS”and fee-for-service ("FFS"), cost plus and flat fee contracts, under which fees are generated based upon billing rates for specific services or defined membership populations.
Seasonality. While Revenue under FFS contracts represents revenue earned under non-capitated contracts in which we bill and collect a specified amount for each service that we provide. FFS revenue is generally fixed, primarilyrecognized in the period in which the services are rendered and is reduced by the estimated impact of contractual allowances.

Customers. In 2023, contracts with state Medicaid agencies and MCOs represented 100.0% of NEMT segment revenue. The NEMT segment does not derive any of its revenue from private pay or other contracts. The NEMT segment derived approximately 11.2%, 10.9% and 9.7% of its revenue from a single state Medicaid agency for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The next four largest NEMT segment customers by
14


revenue comprised in the aggregate approximately 19.8%, 19.8% and 17.7% of NEMT segment revenue for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Development Efforts and New Product Offerings. The delivery of our NEMT program is dependent upon a highly integrated platform of technology and business processes as well as the management of a multifaceted network of third-party transportation providers. Our technology platform is purpose-built for the unique needs of our industry and is highly scalable; capable of supporting substantial growth in our clients’ current and future membership base. In addition, our technology platform efficiently provides a broad interconnectivity among end-users, customers, and our network of transportation providers. We believe this technological capability and our industry experience position us well as a result of the capitated nature of the majority of our contracts, service expense varies based on the utilization of our services. The quarterly operating income and cash flows of NET Services normally fluctuate as a result of seasonal variationsleader in the business, principally dueevolving healthcare industry to introduce valuable population insights. We also believe that it will enable us to deliver to our customers and end-users a single repeatable model that standardizes our offerings and is more customer-centric across each contact center. We provide service offerings and technological features for end-users to improve service levels, lower costs and build the foundation for additional data analytics capabilities. We are continuing to implement a modern, cloud based, interactive, voice responsive automated call distribution and work force management system across all contact centers. Our technology also allows for real time notifications to members on their mobile devices, integration with a wide variety of ATMS and transportation demand during the winter seasonnetwork companies, real time ride tracking, network management and higher demand during the summer season.analytics.

Competition. We compete with a variety of national organizations that provide similar healthcare and social services related to transportation, such as Medical Transportation Management, Southeastrans Veyo,(nka Verida), and American Medical Response,Access2Care, as


well as local and regional providers. Most local competitors seek to win contracts for specific counties or small geographic territories, whereas we and other larger competitors seek to win contracts for an entire state or large regional area. We compete based upon a number of factors, including our nationwide network, technical expertise, experience, service capability, service quality, and price.


Business developmentSeasonality. Our salesquarterly operating income and marketing strategy relies oncash flows normally fluctuate as a concentratedresult of seasonal variations in the business, development effort, with centralized marketing programs. Dueprincipally due to lower transportation demand during the critical nature of ourwinter season and higher demand during the summer season.

PCS Segment

We provide in-home personal care services to our customers rely upon our past delivery performance record, network developmentwith agency branches across various states, including in several of the nation’s largest home care markets: New York, New Jersey, Florida, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, West Virginia and management expertise, technical expertiseConnecticut. We place non-medical personal care assistants, home health aides and capability,skilled nurses primarily to Medicaid patient populations in need of care monitoring and specialized knowledge. A significant portionassistance performing daily living activities in the home setting, including persons who are at increased risk of our revenue is generated from long-term, repeat customers. Our long-term strategy is to improve our positionhospitalization or institutionalization, such as the preferred provider of transportation, complementary network-basedelderly, chronically ill or disabled senior citizens and disabled adults. Our personal care services and data analytics offerings to a broad array of healthcare payers. Key elements of our long-term strategy include continued investment in our technologies, enabling us to both lower costs and improve service delivery. We also consider acquisitions of businesses that serve our market or leverage our nationwide infrastructure.
WD Services
Services offered. WD Services is a global provider of employmentbathing, personal hygiene, grooming, oral care, dressing, medication reminders, meal planning, preparation and placementfeeding, housekeeping, transportation services, legal offender rehabilitationprescription reminders, and assistance with dressing and ambulation, all of which enable aging-in-place and support overall wellness. Within New York, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, our PCS Private Duty Nursing program provides services youth community service programs and certain health related servicestargeted to eligible participants of government sponsored programs. For 2017, 2016 and 2015, WD Services accounted for 18.8%, 21.8% and 26.7%, respectively, of Providence’s consolidated revenue.
WD Services’ end user client base (“WD end-users”) is broad and includes the disabled, recently and long-term unemployed and individuals seeking new skills, as well as individuals that are coping with medical illnesses, are newly graduated from educational institutions, or are being released from incarceration.

assisting medically fragile children. As of December 31, 2017, WD Services operated2023, we had approximately 16,000 trained caregivers throughout all of our branch locations serving, on average, approximately 26,000 patients and providing approximately 27.8 million hours of patient care annually.

Our PCS segment payor clients include federal, state and local governmental agencies, MCOs, commercial insurers and private individuals. The federal, state and local programs under which these organizations operate are subject to legislative, budgetary and other risks that can influence reimbursement rates. MCOs that operate as an extension of our government payors are subject to similar economic pressures. Our commercial insurance payor clients are continuously seeking opportunities to control costs.

Most of our personal care services are provided pursuant to agreements with state and local governmental aging services agencies, Medicaid waiver programs, and home and community based long-term living programs. These agreements generally have an initial term of one to two years and may be terminated with 60 days’ notice. They are typically renewed in 10 countries outsideour experience for one to five-year terms, provided that we have complied with licensing, certification and program standards, and other regulatory requirements.

Reimbursement rates and methods vary by state and type of the U.S. These countries included the United Kingdom (“UK”), France, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Canada, Germany, Australia, Switzerland and Singapore. WD Services also holds a noncontrolling interest in a joint venture in Spain.

In order to build upon its leadership position in the UK employment services industry, enhance client satisfaction and drive greater operational efficiencies, WD Services implemented the Ingeus Futures program, which was substantially completed in 2017. This program included organizational restructuring, the development and deploymentservice, but are typically fee-for-service based on hourly or other unit-of-service bases. MCOs are becoming an increasing portion of new processes and technologies, and increased business development resources. Each aspect of the program was aimed at improving operational efficiencies and client servicesour PCS segment payor mix as well as developing the internal capabilities necessary to ensure long-term profitable growth in the employment, training and healthcare industries.
Revenue,customers and clients. The majority of WD Services’ revenue is generated through the provision of employability, legal offender rehabilitation and trainingstates shift from administering FFS programs to national government entities seeking to reduce unemployment or recidivism rates. Forutilizing managed care models.
15



Customers.In 2023, contracts with state Medicaid agencies and MCOs represented approximately 95.9% of PCS segment revenue, with the remaining revenue derived from private pay and other contracts. The PCS segment derived approximately 11.3%, 12.0% and 11.7% of its revenue from a single state Medicaid agency for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015, 61.4%, 68.3% and 75.5%, respectively, of WD Services’2021, respectively. The next four largest PCS segment customers by revenue was derived from operationscomprised in the UK, with 38.6%aggregate approximately 32.2%, 31.7%29.6% and 24.5%, respectively, derived from operations outside the UK. Additionally, during27.8% of segment revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023 2022, and 2015, respectively, 19.6%, 28.9%2021, respectively.

Development Efforts and 40.0% of WD Services’ revenueNew Product Offerings. We do not deploy proprietary technology in our PCS segment, but we continue to invest in new technology to improve efficiency and team member experience. CareConnect, a scheduling optimization application, was derived from a contractpiloted in Lynbrook, New York. This application integrates with the UK government’s Department of Work and Pensions for employability services and 27.1%, 25.9% and 28.2% of WD Services’ revenue was derived from a contract with the UK government’s Ministry of Justice (the “MOJ”), for legal offender rehabilitation services. Revenueenterprise technology solution Homecare Software Solutions, LLC, which operates under the UK employabilityHHAeXchange brand and which we refer to as “HHAeXchange”, and has enabled caregivers to independently schedule their shifts. The goal of this pilot was to increase the acceptance rate of unfulfilled caregiver shifts, reduce overtime, and enhance Care Coordinator efficiency. Caribou Rewards, an employee recognition program that aligns incentives with desired outcomes, was piloted in both Massachusetts and our largest Pennsylvania branch. This application integrates with our existing home care platforms and applicant tracking system. We have demonstrated success with caregiver referrals in converting to new hires in Massachusetts and sustained an increased use of electronic visit verification (EVV) in our Pennsylvania branch. In addition to these technology solutions, we continue to identify new technologies that we can invest in to further unify our PCS segment across one streamlined technology platform. Additionally, we have invested in Nevvron for an all-in-one e-learning solution that enables required training to be delivered remotely and helps improve utilization by reducing time lost for training. CareConnect, Caribou Rewards, and Nevvron will launch across the PCS segment in 2024 and all three will be accessible to our caregivers through one application.

Competition. The personal care services contractindustry in which we operate is decreasing as expected, as referrals ended under this programhighly competitive and fragmented. Providers range from facility-based agencies (e.g., day health centers, live-in facilities, government agencies) to independent home care companies. They can be not-for-profit organizations or for-profit organizations. There are relatively few barriers to entry in March 31, 2017. In late 2017, WD Services was awarded three new employability contractssome of the home healthcare services markets in which we operate. We believe, however, that we have a favorable competitive position, attributable mainly to:

the consistently high quality and one sub-contract undertargeted services we have provided over the new Workyears to our patients;
our ability to serve complex, high-needs patient populations;
our scale and Health Programmedensity in the UK, allowing Ingeusmarkets we serve;
our strong relationships with payors and referral sources; and
our investments in technology.

Seasonality. Our quarterly operating income and cash flows normally fluctuate as a result of seasonal variations in the business, principally due to continuesomewhat lower demand for in-home services from caregivers during the summer and periods with major holidays, as patients may spend more time with family and less time alone needing outside care during those periods. Our payroll expense in the PCS segment is also generally higher during the earlier quarters of the year prior to employees reaching the applicable thresholds for certain payroll taxes, and during periods with major holidays resulting from holiday pay rates.

RPM Segment

We provide remote patient monitoring services to support patient self-management and care management operations that enable seniors, the chronically ill, and persons with disabilities to maintain its position as a leader intheir independence and avoid long‐term care facilities, preventable emergency room use, hospitalization, and hospital readmission. Services include personal emergency response systems, vitals monitoring, medication adherence solutions, and integrated data reporting and analytics. With high-touch engagement, the UK workforce development market, although overall this programRPM segment has a smaller scale than the legacy employability services contract. During 2017, there was negligible revenue under the new Work and Health Programme.
The revenue earned by WD Services under its contracts is often derived through a combination of different revenue channels including, but not limited to, fees contingent upon: (1) the volume of WD end-users referred to and/or admitted into a specific program, (2) the achievement of defined outcomes for specific individuals, such as a job placement or continued employment and (3) the achievement of defined outcomes forseveral million annual person-to-person interactions over a population of individuals over a specific time period, such as aggregate employment or recidivism rates. The relative contributions of different revenue channels under a specific contract can fluctuate meaningfully over the life of a contract and thus contributeapproximately 253,000 actively monitored health plan members.

We market our RPM services to significant earnings volatility. Revenue recognition related to our National Citizen Services (“NCS”) youth programs can be particularly volatile due to the timing of services provided, which typically occur in the second and third quarters of each year. WD Services also earns revenue under fixed FFS arrangements, based


upon contractual rates established at the outset of the contract or the applicable contract year, although the rate may be prospectively adjusted during the contract year based upon actual volumes. Volume levels are typically not guaranteed under contracts.  
The nature of the services offered by WD Services often relies on our ability to improve a certain set of outcomes at a reduced cost versus previously utilized in-sourced delivery models. As a result, as we commence new contracts using transformational delivery models, we are often required to invest significant upfront capital for information technology, human resources, facilities and other onboarding costs, such as consultants and redundancy payments. The level of upfront funding required is dependent upon the size and nature of the contract. Although significant upfront funding may be required, revenues are often payable only as services are delivered and, in some cases, only after incentive measures have been achieved over a multi-year period. As a result of these two factors, there can be significant variability in our earnings from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year. In addition, under the majority of WD Services’ contracts, the Company relies on its customers, which include government agencies, to provide referrals, for which the Company can provide services and earn revenue. The timing and magnitude of referrals can fluctuate significantly, leading to volatility in revenue. The Company also relies on certain customers to periodically provide information regarding the achievement of service delivery targets, which information could result in reductions in future payments if targets are not met. As a result, we often measure a contracts success over the entire term of the contract and believe the financial results of WD Services are best viewed from a multi-year perspective.

The MOJ is currently reviewing its program for outsourcing probationary services, which includes its contracts with our subsidiary Reducing Reoffending Partnership (“RRP”), which is in our WD Services segment. The review includes an investigation regarding sustainability of the economic terms of such contracts, as well as data relating to reoffending statistics and other factors that could impact contractual performance measures. The potential impact of this review on RRP’s agreement with the MOJ, including with respect to any potential payments to the MOJ that may be required, cannot be determined at this time because the review is ongoing. See also “Risk Factors—Risks Related to our Business—If we fail to satisfy our contractual obligations, we could be liable for damages and financial penalties, which may place existing pledged performance and payment bonds at risk as well as harm our ability to keep our existing contracts or obtain new contracts and future bonds.”

Seasonality. While there has been period-to-period variability in WD Services’ earnings due to the factors discussed above and also set forth in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Revenues and Expenses – WD Services”, there has not been a material seasonal effect on WD Services’ results of operations.
Competition. In the UK, U.S., Saudi Arabia and Singapore the workforce development market is served by large, often multi-national, corporations, along with national and regional for-profithealth plans, government funded benefit programs, healthcare provider organizations, and non-profit entities. In Canada, France, Germany, South Korea, Spainindividuals. Our commercial insurance payor clients are continuously seeking opportunities to control costs.

Customers. The Company serves approximately 253,000 members within national and Switzerland,regional health plans, government-funded benefit programs, and healthcare provider organizations members, and individuals across the
16


country. We have a diverse base of customers across multiple end markets including Medicare Advantage, State and Managed Medicaid, and Health Systems or Distributors.

Development Efforts and New Product Offerings. Our device-agnostic technology platform allows our competitionRPM segment to rapidly adopt and seamlessly integrate new products as hardware innovation continues across the industry. Currently, the Company is primarily companies specificcontracted with over 30 manufacturers and integrated across more than 200 devices. The RPM segment continuously evaluates new products, integrating over 10 devices annually and with rapid onboarding, the Company averages only 30 days to integrate a new product or technology and deploy it in the field.

Competition. We compete with a variety of RPM solution providers that include both new entrants to the geography, nationally or regionally,healthcare industry and both privately owned for-profitlegacy healthcare providers. Top providers include Medtronic, Philips Healthcare, Dexcom, and non-profit entities. InHoneywell Life Sciences. Given the UK,rapidly changing technology that supports the offender rehabilitationhealth-tech industry, any Company that is able to innovate and provide a more efficient and effective solution could enter the RPM market, is served by large corporations, often working with charitable sector providers. In general our larger competitors internationally include Maximus, Interserve, Sodexo, The Reed Group and Working Links.
The market for services to governments is competitive and subject to change and pricing pressure, particularly during the bidding for new contracts and contract renewals. However, due to the critical nature of our offerings and the WD end-users we serve, market entry can be difficult for new entrants or those without prior established track-records. Otherhowever there are significant barriers to entry, include operational service complexityincluding long contracting and significant upfront investments. This can include establishment of complex ITlicensing timeframes, multiple compliance audits necessitating numerous internal tracking systems which often must interface with government systems, significant monitoring and reporting obligations, delivery from sites across wide geographies,complicated reimbursement processes and managementrules.

Corporate and development of supply chains.Other Segment

Business development. Our business development activities are performed both locallyCorporate and centrally from WD Services’ London headquarters. Through localOther segment supports the strategic objectives and global networks and relationships, we become aware of new opportunities for which we develop bids through competitive processes. The naturecontinued growth of the competitive processes varies from highly competitiveModivCare business and includes the activities related to being one of a few providers, orexecutive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal and certain strategic and corporate development functions for each segment. The Corporate and Other segment also includes the sole provider, to bid on a contract. We pursue only those contracts that meet certain investment criteria, including risk-weighted return on capital thresholds, and involve the provision of services where we believe our experience will allow us to deliver differentiated and improved outcomes for our clients.
Matrix Investment
Providence’s Matrix Investment is comprisedoperating results of our interest in Matrix. Since the completion of the Matrix Transaction, the Company has had a noncontrolling equity interest in Matrix. The Company and an affiliate of Frazier Health Partners (the “Frazier Subscriber”), which holds the controllingnon-controlling equity interest in Matrix are partyMedical Network ("Matrix"), which, prior to our segment reorganization that was effective as of January 1, 2022, had been reported as a separate operating segment. In addition, the Second AmendedCorporate and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (the “Operating Agreement”) of Mercury Parent, LLC,Other Segment includes the company through which the parties hold their equity interests in Matrix. The Operating Agreement sets forth certain terms and conditions regarding the ownership by the Company and Frazier Subscriber of interests in Mercury Parent and their indirect ownership of common stock of Matrix, and


provides for, among other things, certain liquidity and governance rights and other obligations and rights, in each case, on the terms and conditions contained therein.

At December 31, 2017, the Company owned a 46.6% noncontrolling interest in Matrix. Prior to the closing of the Matrix Transaction, the financial results of Matrix were includedour investment in our Health Assessment Services (“HA Services”) segment. The Company’s proportionate shareinnovation, made during the first quarter of Matrix’s net assets and financial results for the period following the closing of the Matrix Transaction are presented under the equity method. The assets, liabilities and financial results of Matrix for the period prior to the closing of the Matrix Transaction are presented within discontinued operations. For additional information regarding the Matrix Transaction, see Note 20, Discontinued Operations,2023, related to our consolidated financial statements.
Services offered. Matrix provides in-home care optimization anddata capabilities. As part of this investment in innovation, such wholly-owned subsidiary also began providing virtual clinical care management solutions, which include CHAs. As of December 31, 2017, Matrix utilizedservices (the "MSO") through an unaffiliated professional corporation (the "PC") owned and operated by a national network of over 5,800 clinical providers, including 1,700 nurse practitioners (“NPs”), located across 50 states, to provide its services primarily to members of Medicare Advantage (“MA”) health plans.

Matrix recently expanded its provider network and service offerings through a series of acquisitions. In December 2017, Matrix grew its clinical provider network through its acquisition of LP Health Services, a provider of quality and wellness visits on behalf of Medicaid/Duals managed care plans across the U.S., for a purchase price of $3.8 million. LP Health Services’ revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $6 million.

In February 2018, Matrix completed its acquisition of HealthFair, a leading operator of mobile clinics which offer preventative health assessment and advanced diagnostic testing services, including laboratory, ultrasound, EKG and mammography testing, for a purchase price of $160 million plus an earnout payment contingent on HealthFair’s 2018 performance. With the addition of HealthFair, Matrix’s network increased to more than 6,000 community-based providers across all 50 states, including over 1,700 NPs. We believe the combination of the two organizations will provide health plan members with more convenient access to important care management and preventative health services. As a result of the rollover of certain equity interests of HealthFair, Providence’s equity ownership in Matrix was 43.6% as of February 16, 2018. HealthFair’s revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $45 million.

Matrix primarily generates revenue from CHAs, which obtain a health plan members’ information related to health status, social, environmental and medical risks and help the MA plans improve the accuracy of such information. Matrix’s services typically commence with a member analysis that utilizes client data, such as medical claims data, to maximize its ability to improve client and member outcomes as a result of the assessment process. Through Matrix’s contact centers, which include approximately 160 colleagues, Matrix pursues additional data collection and schedules assessments. Matrix’s NPs then conduct a CHA, which is comprised of a physical examination and other diagnostic services,licensed physician in the member’s home. Matrix also operates a care management offering which provides additional data analyticsthird quarter of 2023.

Our Corporate and chronic care management services.
Matrix’s services are dependent upon itsOther segment operations support the Company's vision to operate as "One ModivCare" and align our people, processes, and technology platform which integrates the clinical provider network, operations infrastructure, call centers and clients. Matrix’s platform is designed for the unique needs of its industry, is highly scalable and can support substantial growth. We believe Matrix’s network and platform positions Matrix as a future focal pointacross each business segment in the evolving healthcare industry in the introduction of both additional population insights and care management services. With data provided by its health plan clients, Matrix utilizes analyticsorder to determine whichbetter serve our members it can most effectively lower costs and improve outcomes through face-to-face engagements with clinicians. Each program is customized and is served by a comprehensive team of case managers, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, and trained call center colleagues.
Revenue,customers and clients. As of December 31, 2017, Matrix’s customers included 48 health plans, including for-profit multi-state health plans and non-profit health plans that operate in only one state or several counties within one state. For the year ended December 31, 2017, Matrix’s top five customers accounted for 72.2% of its revenue, as its largest customer accounted for 30.9% of its revenue and its second largest customer account for 26.8% of its revenue. Matrix enters into annual or multi-annual contracts with its customers under which it is paid on a per assessment basis.
Seasonality. The Company attempts to perform CHAs evenly throughout the year to efficiently utilize NP capacity, although the timing of performance is driven by client demand.  
Competition. We believe that Matrix and CenseoHealth, which announced in December 2017 a combination with Advance Health, a smaller competitor, are the largest independent providers of CHAs to the health plan market. There are many smaller competitors, such as EMSI Healthcare Services, MedXM, which was acquired by Quest Diagnostics on February 1, 2018, and Inovalon. In addition, some health plans in-source CHA services. Matrix’s chronic care management competitors include Landmark Healthcare, PopHealthcare and Optum.


Employees
As of December 31, 2017, there were approximately 7,100 employees across Providence and our subsidiaries. Of such employees, approximately 3,800 work in NET Services and approximately 3,300 work in WD Services. In addition, 30 employees primarily conduct corporate activities. 
None of our U.S. employees are members of a union. We have nearly 1,950 and 330 full-time employees in the UK and France, respectively. Certain of our UK employees are members of the NAPO and Unison unions and certain of our employees in France are members of the Confederation Generale du Travail and have collective bargaining rights. In other countries employees may be membersa positive impact on closing certain health gaps and addressing the social determinants of a trade union but these trade unions are not formally recognized by us. Participation in unions is confidential under European employment laws. We believe we have good relationships with our employees, both unionized and non-unionized, in the U.S. and internationally.health.

Regulatory EnvironmentGovernmental Regulations
NET Services and Matrix Investment

Overview

Our NET Services and Matrix Investment segments (the “U.S. Healthcare Segments”) arebusiness is subject to numerous U.S. federal, state and local laws, regulations and agency guidance (collectively, “Laws”).guidance. These Lawslaws significantly affect the way in which these segmentswe operate various aspects of their businesses. Our U.S. Healthcare Segmentsour business. We must also comply with state and local licensing requirements, state and federal requirements for participation in Medicare and Medicaid, requirements for contracting with MAMedicare Advantage plans, and contractual requirements imposed upon themus by the federal, state and local agencies and third-party commercial customersinsurers that provide payment for our services to which they provide services.patients. Failure to follow the rules and requirements of these programs can significantly affect our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ ability to be paid for the services theywe provide and be authorized to provide services on an ongoing basis.

The Medicare and Medicaid programs are governed by significant and complex Laws.laws. Both Medicare and Medicaid are financed, at least in part, with federal funds. Therefore, any direct or indirect recipients of those funds are subject to federal fraud, waste and abuse Laws.laws. In addition, there are federal privacy and data security Lawslaws that govern the healthcare industry. State Lawslaws primarily pertain to the licensure of certain categories of healthcare professionals and providers and the state’s interest in regulating the quality of healthcare in the state, regardless of the source of payment, but may also include state Lawslaws pertaining to fraud, waste and abuse, privacy and data security Laws,laws, and the state’s regulation of its Medicaid program. Federal and state regulatory laws that may affect our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ businesses,business, include, but are not limited to the following:


false and other improper claims or false statements Lawslaws pertaining to reimbursement;
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, (“HIPAA”)or HIPAA, and its privacy, security, breach notification and enforcement and code set regulations and guidance, along with evolving state Lawslaws protecting patient privacy and requiring notifications of unauthorized access to, or use of, patient medical information;
civil monetary penalties Law;law;
anti-kickback Laws;laws;
17


Section 1877 of the Stark LawSocial Security Act, also known as the “Stark Law”, and other self-referral, financial inducement, fee splitting, and patient brokering Laws;laws;
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, regulations pertaining to Medicare and Medicaid as well as CMS releases applicable to the operation of MAMedicare Advantage plans, such as reimbursement rates, risk adjustment and data collection methodologies, adjustments to quality management measurements and other relevant factors;
State Medicaid laws, rules and regulations that govern program participation, operations, the provision of care to Medicaid beneficiaries and the reimbursement for such services; and
state licensure laws.

A violation of certain of these Lawslaws could result in civil and criminal damages and penalties, the refund of monies paid by government or private payers,payors, our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ exclusion from participation in federal healthcare payerpayor programs, or the loss of our segments’ license to conduct some or all of our business within a particular state’s boundaries. While we believe that our programs are in compliance with these laws, failure to comply with these requirements could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Federal Law and State Laws

Federal healthcare Lawslaws apply in any case in which our U.S. Healthcare Segments are providingwe provide an item or service that is reimbursable or provide information to such segments’our customers that results in reimbursement by a federal healthcare payer program to such segments or to them.payor program. The principal federal Lawslaws that affect our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ businessesbusiness include those that prohibit the filing of false or improper claims or other data with federal healthcare payerpayor programs, and those thatrequire confidentiality of patient health information, prohibit unlawful inducements for the referral of business reimbursable under federal healthcare payer programs.payor programs and those that prohibit physicians from referring to certain entities if the physician has a financial relationship with that entity.



State healthcare laws apply in any case in which we provide an item or service that is reimbursable or provide information to our customers that results in reimbursement by a state Medicaid program. The principal state Medicaid laws that affect our business include those that prohibit the filing of false or improper claims or other data with state Medicaid programs, prohibit unlawful inducements for the referral of business reimbursable by a state Medicaid program and those that prohibit physicians from referring patients to certain entities if the physician has a financial relationship with that entity. Because we receive Medicaid reimbursement, we are subject to applicable participation conditions including a variety of operational, conflict of interest, and structural obligations. For example, in states that have elected to obtain authority to provide NEMT as a medical service through a broker using the regulatory process permitted by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, or DRA, we are prohibited from contracting with any transportation provider with which we have a financial relationship. In addition to Medicaid laws, many states have health care or professional licensure requirements that potentially apply to parts of our business.

False and Other Improper Claims

Under the federal False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733) and similar state Laws,laws, the government may impose civil liability on our U.S. Healthcare Segmentsus if theywe knowingly submit a false claim to the government or cause another to submit a false claim to the government, or knowingly make a false record or statement intended to get a false claim paid by the government. The False Claims Act defines a claim as a demand for money or property made directly to the government or to a contractor, grantee, or other recipient if the money is to be spent on the government’s behalf or if the government will reimburse the contractor or grantee. Liability can be incurred for submitting (or causing another to submit) false claims with actual knowledge or for submitting false claims with reckless disregard or deliberate ignorance. Liability can also be incurred for knowingly making or using a false record or statement to receive payment from the federal government orgovernment; for knowingly and improperly avoiding or decreasing an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the government.government; or for knowingly noncomplying with a law or regulation that is material to the government’s decision to pay Medicare or Medicaid claims. Consequently, a provider need not take an affirmative action to conceal or avoid an obligation to the government, but the mere retention of an overpayment from the government could lead to potential liability under the False Claims Act.

Many states also have similar false claims statutes. In addition, healthcare fraud is a priority of the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (“DHHS”),or DHHS, its program integrity contractors and its Office of Inspector General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and state Attorneys General. These agencies have devoted a significant amount of resources to investigating healthcare fraud.

If our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe are ever found to have violated the False Claims Act, theywe could be required to make significant payments to the government (including damages and penalties in addition to the return of reimbursements previously collected) and could be excluded from participating in federal healthcare programs or providing services to entities which contract with those programs. Although our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe monitor theirour billing practices for compliance with applicable laws, such laws are very complex, and theywe might not
18


be able to detect all errors or interpret such laws in a manner consistent with a court or an agency’s interpretation. While the criminal statutes generally are reserved for instances evidencing fraudulent intent, the civil and administrative penalty statutes are being applied by the federal government in an increasingly broad range of circumstances. Examples of the types of activities giving rise to liability for filing false claims include billing for services not rendered, misrepresenting services rendered (i.e., miscoding), applications for duplicate reimbursement and providing false information that results in reimbursement or impacts reimbursement amounts. Additionally, the federal government takes the position that a pattern of claiming reimbursement for unnecessary services violates these statutes if the claimant should have known that the services were unnecessary. The federal government also takes the position that claiming reimbursement for services that are substandard is a violation of these statutes if the claimant should have known that the care was substandard. Criminal penalties also are available even in the case of claims filed with private insurers if the federal government shows that the claims constitute mail fraud or wire fraud or violate any of the federal criminal healthcare fraud statutes.

State Medicaid agencies and state Attorneys General also have authority to seek criminal or civil sanctions for fraud and abuse violations. In addition, private insurers may bring actions under state false claim laws. In certain circumstances, federal and state laws authorize private whistleblowers to bring false claim or “qui tam” suits on behalf of the government against providers and reward the whistleblower with a portion of any final recovery. In addition, the federal government has engaged a number of private audit organizations to assist it in tracking and recovering claims for healthcare services that may have been improperly submitted.

Governmental investigations and whistleblower “qui tam”qui tam suits against healthcare companies have increased significantly in recent years,remain at high levels and have resulted in substantial penalties and fines and exclusions of persons and entities from participating in government healthcare programs. For more information on the risks related to aWhile we believe that our programs are in compliance with these laws, failure to comply with applicable government coding and billing rules, see “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks—Our segments could be subject to actions for false claims or recoupment of funds pursuant to certain audits if they do not comply with government coding and billing rules, whichthese requirements could have a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results.”business.

Health Information, Privacy and Data Protection Practices

Under HIPAA, DHHS issued rules to define and implement standards for the electronic transactions and code sets for the submission of transactions such as claims, and privacy and security of individually identifiable health information in whatever manner it is maintained.

The Final Rule on Enforcement of the HIPAA Administrative Simplification provisions, including the transaction standards, the security standards and the privacy rule, published by DHHS addresses, among other issues, DHHS’s policies for determining violations and calculating civil monetary penalties, how DHHS will address the statutory limitations on the imposition of civil monetary penalties, and various procedural issues. The rule extends enforcement provisions currently applicable to the


healthcare privacy regulations to other HIPAA standards, including security, transactions and the appropriate use of service code sets.

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, (“HITECH”),or HITECH, enacted as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, extends certain of HIPAA’s obligations to parties providing services to healthcare entities covered by HIPAA known as “business associates,” imposes new notice of privacy breach reporting obligations, extends enforcement powers to state attorney generalsAttorneys General and amends the HIPAA privacy and security laws to strengthen the civil and criminal enforcement of HIPAA. HITECH establishes four categories of violations that reflect increasing levels of culpability, four corresponding tiers of penalty amounts that significantly increase the minimum penalty amount for each violation, and a maximum penalty amount of $1.5 million for all violations of an identical provision. With the additional HIPAA enforcement power under HITECH, the Office offor Civil Rights of the Department of Health and Human ServicesDHHS and states are increasing their investigations and enforcement of HIPAA compliance. Our U.S. Healthcare SegmentsWe have taken steps to ensure compliance with HIPAA and we are monitoring compliance on an ongoing basis.

Additionally, the HITECH Final Rule imposes various requirements on covered entities and business associates, and expands the definition of “business associates” to cover contractors of business associates. Even when our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe are not operating as covered entities, theywe may be deemed to be “business associates” for HIPAA rule purposes of such covered entities. Our U.S. Healthcare SegmentsWe monitor their compliance obligations under HIPAA as modified by HITECH, and implement operational and systems changes, associate training and education, conduct risk assessments and allocate resources as needed. Any noncompliance with HIPPAHIPAA requirements could expose such segmentsus to the criminal and increased civil penalties provided under HITECH and require them to incur significant costs in order to seek to comply with its requirements or to remediate potential issues that may arise.

Other state privacy laws may also apply to us, including the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, which came into force in January 2020. The CCPA affords California residents with specified rights relating to the collection and use of their personal information. Violation of the CCPA may lead to monetary fines, and data breaches may give rise in certain
19


circumstances to private rights of action by impacted individuals. While we believe that our practices are in compliance with these laws, failure to comply with these requirements could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Federal and State Anti-Kickback Laws

Federal law commonly known as the “Anti-Kickback Statute” prohibits the knowing and willful offer, solicitation, payment or receipt of anything of value (direct or indirect, overt or covert, in cash or in kind) which is intended to induce:

the referral of an individual for a service for which payment may be made by Medicare, Medicaid or certain other federal healthcare programs; or
the ordering, purchasing, leasing, or arranging for, or recommending the purchase, lease or order of, any service or item for which payment may be made by Medicare, Medicaid or certain other federal healthcare programs.

Interpretations of the Anti-Kickback Statute have been very broad and under current Law,law, courts and federal regulatory authorities have stated that the Anti-Kickback Statute is violated if even one purpose (as opposed to the sole or primary purpose) of the arrangement is to induce referrals. Even bona fide investment interests in a healthcare provider may be questioned under the Anti-Kickback Statute if the government concludes that the opportunity to invest was offered as an inducement for referrals.

This act is subject to numerous statutory and regulatory “safe harbors.” Compliance with the requirements of a safe harbor offers defenses against Anti-Kickback Statute allegations. Failure of an arrangement to satisfy all of the requirements of a particular safe harbor does not mean that the arrangement is unlawful. However, itIt may mean, however, that such an arrangement will be subject to scrutiny by the regulatory authorities.

Many states, including some where our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe do business, have adopted anti-kickback laws that are similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. Some of these state laws are very closely patterned on the federal Anti-Kickback Statute; others, however, are broader and reach reimbursement by private payers.payors. If our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ activities were deemed to be inconsistent with state anti-kickback or illegal remuneration laws, theywe could face civil and criminal penalties or be barred from such activities, any of which could harm such segments’ businesses.us.


If our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ arrangements are found to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute or applicable state laws, these segments,we, along with theirour clients, would be subject to civil and criminal penalties, and these segments’ arrangements wouldpenalties. In addition, implicated contracts may not be legally enforceable, which could materially and adversely affect theirour business. For more information on the risks related toWhile we believe that our programs are in compliance with these laws, failure to comply with applicable anti-bribery and anti-corruption regulations, see “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks—Our segments’ businessthese requirements could be subject to civil penalties and loss of business if we fail to comply with applicable bribery, corruption and other regulations governing business with governments.”have a material adverse impact on our business.

Federal and State Self-Referral Prohibitions

Our U.S. Healthcare SegmentsWe may be subject to federal and state statutes banning payments for referrals of patients and referrals by physicians to healthcare providers with whom the physicians have a financial relationship. Section 1877 of the Social Security Act, also known as the “Stark Law”, prohibits physicians from making a “referral” for “designated health services” for


Medicare (and in many cases Medicaid) patients from entities or facilities in which such physicians directly or indirectly hold a “financial relationship”.

A financial relationship can take the form of a direct or indirect ownership, investment or compensation arrangement. A referral includes the request by a physician for, or ordering of, or the certifying or recertifying the need for, any designated health services.

Certain services that our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe provide may be identified as “designated health services” for purposes of the Stark Law. Such segmentsWe cannot provide assurance that future regulatory changes will not result in other services they provide becoming subject to the Stark Law’s ownership, investment or compensation prohibitions in the future.

Many states, including some states where our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe do business, have adopted similar or broader prohibitions against payments that are intended to induce referrals of clients. Moreover, many states where such segmentswe operate have laws similar to the Stark Law prohibiting physician self-referrals. While our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe believe that theyour programs are operating in compliance with the Stark Law, there can be no guarantee that violations will not occur. 
Healthcare Reform
On March 23, 2010, the President of the United States signed into law comprehensive health reform through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 11-148) (“PPACA”). On March 30, 2010, the President signed a reconciliation budget bill that included amendmentsthese laws, failure to the PPACA (Pub. L. 11-152). These laws in combination form the “ACA” referred to herein. The changes to various aspects of the healthcare system in the ACA were far-reaching and included, among many others, substantial adjustments to Medicare reimbursement, establishment of individual mandates for healthcare coverage, extension of coverage to certain populations, expansion of Medicaid, restrictions on physician-owned hospitals, and increased efficiency and oversight provisions.
Some of the provisions of the ACA took effect immediately, while others will take effect later or will be phased in over time, ranging from a few months following approval to ten years. Due to the complexity of the ACA, it is likely that additional legislation will be considered and enacted. The ACA requires the promulgation of regulations that will likely have significant effects on the healthcare industry and third-party payers. Thus, the healthcare industry and our operations may be subjected to significant new statutory and regulatorycomply with these requirements and contractual terms and conditions, and consequently to structural and operational changes and challenges.
The ACA also implemented significant changes to healthcare fraud and abuse laws that intensify the risks and consequences of enforcement actions. These included expansion of the False Claims Act by: (a) narrowing the public disclosure bar; and (b) explicitly stating that violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute trigger false claims liability. In addition, the ACA lessened the intent requirements under the Anti-Kickback Statute to provide that a person may violate the statute without knowledge or specific intent. The ACA also provided new funding and expanded powers to investigate fraud, including through expansion of the Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor (“RAC”) program to Medicare Parts C and D and Medicaid and authorizing the suspension of Medicare and Medicaid payments to a provider of services pending an investigation of a credible allegation of fraud. Finally, the legislation created enhanced penalties for noncompliance, including increased criminal penalties and expansion of administrative penalties under Medicare and Medicaid. Collectively, such changes could have a material adverse impact on our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ operations.business.
On January 20, 2017, the President of the United States issued an executive order that directed federal agencies to take steps to ensure the government’s implementation of the ACA minimizes the burden on impacted parties (such as individuals and states). The underlying intent of the executive order was to take the first steps to repeal and replace the ACA. The executive order specifically instructed agencies to “waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay implementation of provisions” that place a “fiscal burden on any State” or that impose a “cost, fee, tax, penalty, or regulatory burden” on stakeholders including patients, providers, and insurers. The order stated that any changes should be made only to the extent “permitted by law” and should comply with the law governing administrative rule-making. The executive order did not, however, provide specifics on next steps or provisions that would be reexamined nor was it clear how the executive branch would be reconciled with Republican congressional efforts to repeal and replace the ACA or what portions of the ACA may continue in any replacement legislation. There are multiple pending legislative proposals to amend the ACA which, among other effects, could repeal all or parts of the ACA without replacing its extension of coverage to expansion populations. In addition, there are pending legislative proposals to materially restructure Medicaid and other government health care programs.

In 2017, legislation was proposed in the U.S. Congress, but did not advance out of committee and was not passed, which would reduce or eliminate certain non-emergency medical transportation services provided by NET Services as a required Medicaid


benefit. A similar proposal was made in 2018 by the President of the United States in a federal budget proposal. If additional privatization initiatives are not proposed or enacted, or if previously enacted privatization initiatives are challenged, repealed or invalidated, there could be a material adverse impact on our segments' operating results.

Surveys and Audits

20


Our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ programs arebusiness is subject to periodic surveys by government authorities or their contractors and our payors to ensure compliance with various requirements. Regulators conducting periodic surveys often provide reports containing statements of deficiencies for alleged failures to comply with various regulatory requirements. In most cases, if a deficiency finding is made by a reviewing agency, our segmentswe will work with the reviewing agency to agree upon the steps to be taken to bring our program into compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. In some cases, however, an agency may take a number of adverse actions against a program, including:


the imposition of fines or penalties or the recoupment of amounts paid;
temporary suspension of admission of new clients to our program’s service;
in extreme circumstances, exclusion from participation in Medicaid, Medicare or other programs;
revocation of our license; or
contract termination.

While our U.S. Healthcare Segmentswe believe that our programs are in compliance with Medicare, Medicaid and other program certification requirements and state licensure requirements, failurethe rules and regulations governing Medicare, Medicaid participation and state licensure are lengthy and complex. Failure to comply with these requirementslaws could have a material adverse impact on such segments’ businessesour business and theirour ability to enter into contracts with other agencies to provide services.

Billing/claimsClaims Reviews and Audits

Agencies and other third-party commercial payerspayors periodically conduct pre-payment or post-payment medical reviews or other audits of our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ claims or other audits in conjunction with their obligations to comply with the requirements of Medicare or Medicaid. In order to conduct these reviews, payerspayors request documentation from our U.S. Healthcare Segmentsus and then review that documentation to determine compliance with applicable rules and regulations, including the eligibility of clients to receive benefits, the appropriateness of the care provided to those clients, and the documentation of that care. Any determination that such segmentswe have not complied with applicable rules and regulations could result in adjustment of payments or the incurrence of fines and penalties, or in situations of significant compliance failures review or non-renewal of related contracts.

Corporate Practice of Medicine and Fee Splitting

SomeThe corporate practice of medicine doctrine prohibits corporations from practicing medicine or employing a physician to provide professional medical services. This doctrine arises from state medical practice acts and is based on a number of public policy concerns, including:

allowing corporations to practice medicine or employ physicians will result in the commercialization of the practice of medicine;
a corporation’s obligation to its stockholders may not align with a physician’s obligation to the physician’s patients; and
employment of a physician by a corporation may interfere with the physician’s independent medical judgment.

Most states in which our U.S. Healthcare Segments operateMatrix operates and in which we provide personal care services prohibit general business entities, such asthe corporate practice of medicine. Every state provides an exception for physician ownership of a professional corporation. Many states provide an exception for employment of physicians by certain entities. The scope of these segments, from “practicing medicine,” which definitionexceptions varies from state to state. Corporate practice of medicine doctrine issues can also overlap with kickback and fee-splitting concerns. Some states use the corporate practice of medicine doctrine to limit the services that a manager can furnish to a physician or medical practice because the state is concerned that a manager might interfere with the physician’s independent medical judgment and/or impose an unacceptable intrusion into the relationship between the physician and can include employing physicians, as well as engaging in fee-splittingthe patient.

Among other activities, Matrix currently contracts with and employs nurse practitioners to perform Comprehensive Health Assessments ("CHAs") and our PCS segment currently:

employs registered nurses and licensed practical nurses to render skilled nursing care directly and to provide overall clinical supervision to patients; and
has medical professionals provide guidance to its Quality Improvement Committees.

In addition, under the MSO-PC model within the Corporate and Other Segment, the MSO’s contractual relationships and arrangements with thesethe PC, through which virtual healthcare providers. Amongservices are provided, may implicate certain of the corporate practice of medicine laws, which prohibit non-professional entities from providing licensed medical services or exercising
21


control over licensed physicians or other things, our U.S. Healthcare Segments currently contract withhealthcare professionals. This MSO-PC model may also implicate certain fee-splitting and employ NPs to perform CHAs. Weanti-kickback laws.

While we believe that such segmentsMatrix, our PCS segment, and the MSO-PC model have structured their operations appropriately; however, theyappropriately, any of these could be alleged or found to be in violation of some or all of these laws. If a state determines that some portion of our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ businesses violatethe business violates these laws, or that a payment induced a physician to refer a patient, it may seek to have such segmentsan entity discontinue or restructure those portions of their operations or subject themthe entity to increased costs, penalties, fines, certain license requirements or other measures. Any determination that such segments haveMatrix or we acted improperly in this regard may result in liability to them.liability. In addition, agreements between the corporationMatrix and the particular professional may be considered void and unenforceable.

Professional Licensure and Other Requirements

Many of our U.S. Healthcare Segments’Matrix’s employees are subject to federal and state laws and regulations governing the ethics and practice of their professions. For example, our mid-level practitioners (e.g., NPs)Nurse Practitioners) are subject to state laws requiring physician supervision and state laws governing mid-level scope of practice. As thephysicians’ use of mid-level practitioners by physicians increases, state governing boards are implementing more robust regulations governing mid-levels and their scope of practice under physician supervision. Our U.S. Healthcare Segments’The ability of Matrix to provide mid-level practitioner services may be restricted by the enactment of new state laws governing mid-level scope of practice and by state agency interpretations and enforcement of such existing laws. In addition, services rendered by mid-level practitioners may not be reimbursed by payors at the same rates as payors may reimburse physicians for the same services. Lastly, professionals who are eligible to participate in Medicare and Medicaid as individual providers must not have been excluded from participation in government programs at any time. Our U.S. Healthcare Segments’The ability of Matrix to provide services depends upon the ability of their personnel to meet individual licensure and other requirements and maintain such licensure in good standing.



COVID-19 Public Health Emergency Orders
WD
On May 11, 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services

Overview
As a provider ("HHS") declared the end of workforce development servicesthe public health emergency ("PHE") for the COVID-19 pandemic. Emergency, public health and executive orders, issued, extended, or declared by the U.S. federal and state governments in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have waived numerous legal requirements while also imposing new legal restrictions which are issued, rescinded or modified with little advance notice. These emergency, public health and executive orders have created significant uncertainty in the U.S.legal and 10 countries outsideoperational duties of health care providers. The declaration of the U.S., WD Services is subjectend of the public health emergency has and will continue to numerous national and local laws and regulations. These laws and regulations significantly affect the way in which we operate various aspects of our business. WD Services has implemented compliance policies to help assure our compliance with these laws and regulations as they become effective; however, different interpretations or enforcement of these laws and regulationsresult in the future could subject our practicesrescission and modification of a number of regulatory requirements which will likely increase the uncertainty of the legal and operational duties of health care providers. While we have taken measures to allegationsplan and prepare for the end of impropriety or illegality or could require us to make changes in our facilities, equipment, personnel, services or the manner in which we conduct our business.

WD Services’ revenue is primarily derived from contracts that are funded by national governments that are seeking to reduce the overall unemployment rate or improve job placement success for targeted cohorts, and to reduce the recidivism rate. Further, the revenue we receive from these contracts is typically tied to milestones that are largely uncontrolled by us. Such milestones include the job placement success of clients, duration and tenure of clients in jobs once they are placed, and various other market and industry factors including the overall unemployment rate. For more information on the risks related topublic health emergency, failure to satisfyadjust our contractual obligations, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—If we fail to satisfy our contractual obligations, we could be liable for damagesoperations based upon the public health emergency reaching its end and financial penalties, which may place existing pledged performance and payment bonds at risk as well as harm our ability to keep our existing contracts or obtain new contracts and future bonds.”
Data Security and Protection

WD Services is also subject to the European Union’s and other countries’ data security and protection laws and regulations. These laws and regulations impose broad obligations on the organizations that collect such data, as well as confer broad rights on individuals about whom such data is collected. There are amendments which will come into effect in 2018 with respect to European data privacy legislation which will significantly increase the fines for any breaches. In addition to their power to impose fines, information privacy regulators in Europe have significant powers to require organizations that breach regulations toresulting wind down of certain regulatory measures put in place measures to ensure that such breaches do not occur again, and require businessesrespond to stop processing personal information until the required measures are in place. For more information on the risks related topublic health concerns as a failure to comply with privacy and security regulations, see “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks—Our segments are subject to regulations relating to privacy and security of patient and service user information. Failure to comply with privacy and security regulations could result in a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results.”

The data security and protection laws and regulations may also restrict the flow of information, including information about employees or service users, from WD Services to Providence in the U.S. In certain instances, informed consent to the data transfer must be given by the affected employee or service user. Compliance with such laws and regulations is costly and requires our segment management to expend substantial time and resources which could negatively impact our segments’ results of operations. Compliance may also make it more difficult for the Company to gather data necessary to ensure the appropriate operation of its internal controls or to detect corruption, resulting in the need for additional controls or increasing the Company’s costs to maintain appropriate controls.

Anti-Bribery and Corruption

WD Services’ international operations are subject to various U.S. and foreign statutes that prohibit bribery and corruption, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the UK’s Bribery Act. These statutes generally require organizations to prohibit bribery by or for the organization and demand the implementation of systems to counter bribery, including risk management, training and guidance and the maintenance of adequate record-keeping and internal accounting practices. The statutes also, among other things, prevent the provision of anything of value to government officials for the purposes of influencing official decisions or obtaining or retaining business or otherwise obtaining favorable treatment. In addition, many countries in which we operate have antitrust or competition regulations which, among other things, prohibit collusive tendering or bid-rigging behavior. For more information on the risks related to a failure to comply with applicable anti-bribery and anti-corruption regulations, see “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks—Our segments’ business could be subject to civil penalties and loss of business if we fail to comply with applicable bribery, corruption and other regulations governing business with governments.”

Licensing

In many of the locations where WD Services operates, it is required by local laws to obtain and maintain licenses. The applicable state and local licensing requirements govern the services our segments provide, the credentials of staff, record keeping, treatment planning, client monitoring and supervision of staff. The failure to maintain these licenses or the loss of a license could


have a material adverse impact on WD Services businesses and could prevent them from providing services to clients in a given jurisdiction.

Surveys and audits
WD Services’ contracts permit clients to review its compliance or performance, as well as its records, at the client’s discretion. In most cases, if a deficiency is found by a reviewing agency, WD Services’ will work with the reviewing agency to agree upon the steps to be taken to bring our program into compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. In the case of any deficiency, however, a client may take a number of adverse actions against WD Services, including: (i) termination or modification of existing contracts, (ii) prevention of receipt of new contracts or extension of existing contracts or (iii) reduction of fees paid under existing contract.
Billing Requirements
In WD Services, particularly in Europe, our contracts are subject to stringent claims and invoice processing regimes which vary depending on the customer and nature of the payment mechanism. Under European procurement legislation which has been implemented in each EU member state, any conviction for fraud can result in a ban from participating in public procurement tenders for up to five years, or until the organization in question has put in place “self clean” measures to the satisfaction of the procuring authority. For more information on the risks related to a failure to comply with applicable government coding and billing rules, see “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks—Our segments could be subject to actions for false claims or recoupment of funds pursuant to certain audits if they do not comply with government coding and billing rules, whichglobal pandemic could have a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results.”business.


BrexitCARES Act Provider Relief Fund and ARPA State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program


The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, which was signed into law on March 27, 2020 (the "CARES Act"), established the Provider Relief Fund ("PRF") that made relief payments to certain health care providers. The purpose of the PRF was to provide funding to health care providers so they could prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. Providers who received relief payments are subject to eligibility criteria and specific terms and conditions on the use of relief payments. To receive relief payments, many providers were required to attest to numerous statements regarding accuracy of their application and their compliance with the eligibility criteria and the terms and conditions. Providers’ use of relief payments is limited to health care related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to coronavirus. Providers are required to have documentation that relief payments were used for those purposes.

The American Rescue Plan Act ("ARPA"), which was signed into law on March 11, 2021, established the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recover Funds ("SLFRF") program which issued a final rule in 2022 that delivered funding to state, territorial, local, and Tribal governments across the country to support their response to and recovery from the COVID-19 public health emergency. The purpose of the SLFRF was to support families and businesses struggling with the public health and economic impacts of the pandemic, maintain vital public services despite declining revenues from the crisis, and build a strong and equitable recovery from the pandemic by making investments in long-term growth and opportunity. While the intention of the SLFRF was to allow for flexibility of the diverse and disproportionate needs across diverse communities, compliance and reporting requirements exist which require recipients to report to the U.S. Department of the Treasury and ensure all SLFRF are used in compliance with the program's requirements. Recipients are also responsible for subrecipient oversight and management and providing supporting documentation as required by the Department of Treasury.
22



For both government fund programs, there is limited guidance concerning what the government might consider a health care related expense or lost revenue that was attributable to coronavirus or what type of documentation is adequate. As our PCS segment has received relief payments from the CARES Act PRF and ARPA SLFRF, we must comply with all reporting requirements instituted for recipients of these funds. While we believe that the receipt and use of these funds was in compliance with PRF and SLFRF requirements, failure to comply with these requirements could have a material adverse impact on our business.

California Climate Disclosure Laws

On June 23, 2016,Oct. 7, 2023, California enacted three climate-related bills imposing extensive new climate-related disclosure obligations applicable to companies doing business in California. The Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) requires covered companies with total annual revenues of $1 billion or more to disclose annually their Scope 1 (direct emissions from owned and controlled sources) and Scope 2 (indirect emissions from energy purchased and used) greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions beginning in 2026, and Scope 3 (indirect emissions up and down value chain) greenhouse gas emissions beginning in 2027. Certain attestation requirements also apply to these Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 GHG emission reports, pursuant to which assurance must be provided by an approved third-party assurance provider. The information required to make the UK held a referendumdisclosures is complex and requires sophisticated internal and third party GHG risk management and data collection procedures to be in which eligible persons votedplace prior to the beginning of fiscal year 2025.

In addition, the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261) requires covered companies with total annual revenues of $500 million or more to publish biennial reports disclosing climate-related financial risks and the measures adopted to mitigate the disclosed risks by January 1, 2026. The Voluntary Carbon Market Disclosures Act (AB 1305), effective January 1, 2024, requires companies making certain claims, including regarding carbon neutrality or reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and companies purchasing carbon offsets in favor of a proposal that the UK leave the EU, also known as “Brexit”. The result of the referendum increased political and economic uncertainty in the UK for the foreseeable future, in particular during any period where the terms of any UK exit from the EU are negotiated. In turn, Brexit could cause disruptionsaddition to and create uncertainty surrounding our business, including affecting our relationships with our existing and future payers and employees, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results, operations and prospects, including being adversely affected in ways that cannot be anticipated at present. For moremaking such claims, to disclose information on the risksdetermination of accuracy of the claim, interim progress measures, third-party verification and, if applicable, information on the carbon offsets purchased and emissions data. The laws may be modified by future legislation. We are in the process of assessing the potential impact of these new climate disclosure laws.

Human Capital Management

Attracting, developing, and retaining talented people who embrace our culture, execute our strategy, and enable us to compete effectively in our industry is critical to our success. Our vision statement, “We drive positive health outcomes by transforming the way we connect to care” is at the core of everything we do. We understand that our success is directly correlated to ensuring that we have the right team members and that each of our team members is passionate about the important role that they play in executing our vision and improving the health outcomes of our members. As such, we aim to attract and retain qualified and passionate people that represent a diverse array of perspectives and skills who work together as a cohesive team that embodies our values and support our mission.

Our ability to recruit and retain our employees depends on a number of factors, including providing competitive compensation and benefits, development and career advancement opportunities, and a collegial work environment. We invest in those areas in an effort to ensure that we continue to be the employer of choice for our team members.

Compensation and Benefits

Our benefits are designed to help team members and their families stay healthy, meet their financial goals, protect their income and help them have harmony between their work and personal lives. These benefits include health and wellness, paid time off, employee assistance, competitive pay, broad-based bonus programs, pension and retirement savings plans, career growth opportunities, and a culture of recognition.

Team Member Development and Advancement

We invest significant resources to develop team members with the right capabilities to deliver the growth and innovation needed to support our strategy. We seek to ensure that we are building the organizational capabilities required for success in the years to come. We offer team members and their managers several tools to help in their personal and professional development, including career development plans, mentoring programs and in-house learning opportunities, including an in-house continuing education program. We also have a practice of investing in our next generation of leaders and offer team members a number of leadership development programs. We believe in and encourage our team members and managers to
23


maintain a growth mindset, a belief that qualities and talents can be developed through dedication and hard work, and have aligned our performance management programs to support our culture transformation with increased focus on continuous learning and development.

As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately 21,200 team members, of which approximately 3,900 were dedicated to our NEMT and our Corporate and Other segments, 16,800 were dedicated to our PCS segment, and 500 were dedicated to our RPM segment. Approximately 2,700 of our PCS segment caregivers were unionized in New York at the end of 2023, and we believe that we have good relationships with all of our team members.

Demographics and Diversity

Our team members reflect the communities in which they live and work and the members they serve and they possess a broad range of thoughts and experiences that have helped us achieve our successes to date. A key component of our growth and success is our commitment to diversity and inclusion. We believe this commitment allows us to better our understanding of member needs, while developing technologies and solutions to meet those needs. As part of our efforts to advance this important area, we have instituted several forums to ensure our team members have a channel to share their experiences. This includes our annual experience survey and quarterly town hall meetings where our executive leadership team can gather feedback from our team members and answer questions related to their concerns. Additionally, we have developed seven Employee Resource Groups ("ERGs"), which are team member led, experience-based groups of individuals that share a common interest in diversity and inclusion topics such as race, ethnicity, national origin, veteran status, ability awareness, gender, and sexual orientation/gender identity. Each of our ERGs is sponsored by a member of our executive leadership team or senior management that serves as an advocate and representative on our Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Council ("DEI Council") to continue the UK’s exitadvancement of these important initiatives and further our effort to make an impact from the European Union, see “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks—work that each of these ERGs is doing. Although we have made progress in our workforce diversity representation, we continue to seek input from our team members and make significant strides to continue to improve and make meaningful impacts in this area. We have established goals to continue improving our hiring, development, and retention of team members with diverse backgrounds and our overall diversity representation, including within our executive leadership team, in an effort to be a socially-responsible community member.

We also include additional team member information in our annual Environmental, Social, and Governance ("ESG") reports, which are available on our website.

Environmental, Social and Governance

In May 2023, we released our 2022 ESG report. This was our second publication of the report and we will continue to prepare this report annually to enhance our disclosures and provide key information about our work toward our commitment to eliminating inequities in healthcare while enhancing our sustainability and governance efforts.

Environmental

Making connections to care is our purpose. We strive to bring equity, hope, and healing to those who need it most, one member at a time. We do this through our NEMT segment where we connect our members to their non-emergency medical appointments so they can receive necessary care; through our PCS segment where our caregivers provide necessary services to our members who need assistance performing daily-living activities in the comfort of their homes; and through our RPM segment where our real-time monitoring services allow our members to live peacefully in their homes while assisting and engaging in response services in the event that an emergency occurs. While our mission to be a leader in addressing the SDoH has our members at the forefront of each decision we make, we are also committed to being a responsible environmental steward in the communities in which we serve. This includes using our multi-modal strategy within the NEMT segment in order to not only provide the most appropriate mode of transportation for each individual member, but to also increase the use of public transit or multi-passenger vehicles when possible. Additionally, we work with our transportation providers to find more efficient routes, eliminate unnecessary trips and assist with procurement of more fuel-efficient fleets.

Social

Members of all incomes and identities rely on our non-emergency medical transportation, personal care services, and remote patient monitoring solutions to receive greater access to healthcare. We seek to improve the lives of our members by providing connections to care and eliminating inequities in healthcare. Our team operates with the same passion for helping and serving our members that we care for in order to improve their lives and health outcomes.

24


Governance

Our board of directors regularly evaluates our corporate governance structure and processes to help steer the Company's direction and ensure we are operating with the utmost business couldintegrity. More information about our directors, executive officers and governance will be adversely affected by the referendum on the UK’s exit from the European Union.”included in our 2024 Proxy Statement for our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.


Additional Information

The Company’s website at www.prscholdings.com provides access to its periodic reports, certain corporate governance documents, press releases, interim shareholder reports and links to its subsidiaries’ websites. The Company makes available to the public on its website at www.modivcare.com its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files such material with, or furnishes such material to, the SEC. Our SEC filings are also available to the public at www.sec.gov. Copies are also available, without charge, upon request to The Providence Service Corporation, 700 Canal Street, ThirdModivCare Inc., 6900 E Layton Avenue, 12th Floor, Stamford, CT 06902, (203) 307-2800,Denver, Colorado 80237, (303) 728-7012, Attention: Corporate Secretary.VP of Investor Relations. In addition, we routinely post important information for investors on our website and may use our website as a means of disclosing material information in compliance with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. Accordingly, investors should monitor our website in addition to following our press releases, SEC filings, public conference calls, presentations and webcasts. The information contained on our website is not part of, and is not incorporated by reference in, this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the SEC.
25




Item 1A.Risk Factors.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

You should consider and read carefully all of the risks and uncertainties described below, as well as the other information included in this Annual Report, on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. The risks described below have been organized under headings that are provided for convenience and intended to organize the risks and uncertainties into related categories to improve readability for investors; no inference should be drawn, however, that the placement of a risk factor under a particular category means that it is not applicable to another category of risks or that it may be more or less material than another risk factor. Regardless, they are also not the only onesrisks and uncertainties facing us. The occurrence of any of the following risks or additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. This Annual Report on Form 10-K also contains forward-looking statements and estimates that involve risks and uncertainties.uncertainties, as discussed above in this Part I under the caption “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-lookingforward‑looking statements as a result of specificmany factors, including the risksrisk factors and uncertainties described below.

Risks Related to Our BusinessIndustry

There canThe cost of healthcare is funded substantially by government and private insurance programs, and if such funding is reduced or limited or no longer available, our business may be no assuranceadversely impacted.

Third-party payors, including Medicaid, Medicare and private health insurance providers, provide substantial funding for our services. Other payors, including MCOs, are also dependent upon Medicaid funding. These payors are increasingly seeking to reduce the cost of healthcare, which drives pressure on the reimbursement rates for healthcare services, which include our services. We cannot assure you that our contracts will survive until the end of their stated terms, or that upon their expirationservices will be renewed or extended on satisfactory terms, if at all. Disruptions to, the early expiration of or the failure to renew our contracts could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our NET Services contracts, and certain WD Services contracts, are subject to frequent renewal. For example, many of the state Medicaid contracts heldconsidered cost-effective by NET Services, which represented 55.9% of NET Services revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017, have terms ranging from three to five years and are typically subject to a competitive bidding process near the end of the term. NET Services also contracts with MCOs, which represented 44.1% of NET Services revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017. MCO contracts typically continue until terminated by either party upon reasonable notice (as determined in accordance with the contract). We cannot anticipate if, when or to what extent we will be successful in renewing our state government contracts or retaining our MCO contracts. During 2017, we experienced a decline in operating income as a percentage of revenue due to the nonrenewal of certain state contracts. In addition, with respect to many of our contracts, the payer may terminate the contract without cause, at will and without penalty to the payer, either immediately or upon the expiration of a short notice period in the eventthird-party payors, that among other reasons, government appropriations supporting the programs serviced by the contract are reduced or eliminated or the payer deems our performance under the contract to be unsatisfactory.
We cannot anticipate if, when or to what extent a payer might terminate its contract with us prior to its expiration, or fail to renew or extend a contract with us. If we are unable to retain or renew our contracts, or replace lost contracts, on satisfactory terms our financial conditions and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. While we pursue new contract awards and also undertake efficiency measures, there can be no assurance that such measures will fully offset the impact of contracts that are not renewed or are cancelled on our operating income and results of operations.
We obtain a significant portion of our business through responses to government requests for proposals and we may not be awarded contracts through this process in the future, or contracts we are awarded may not be profitable.
We obtain, andreimbursement will continue to seek to obtain, a significant portion of our business from national, state, and local government entities. To obtain business from government entities, we are often required to respond to requests for proposals (“RFPs”). To propose effectively, we must accurately estimate our cost structure for servicing a proposed contract, the time required to establish operations and the terms of the proposals submitted by competitors. We must also assemble and submit a large volume of information within rigid and often short timetables. Our ability to respond successfully to RFPsbe available, or that payor reimbursement policies will greatly impact our business. If we misinterpret bid requirements as to performance criteria or do not accurately estimate performance costs in a binding bid for an RFP, we will seek to correct such mistakes in the final contract. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to modify the proposed contract and we may be required to perform under a contract that is not profitable.
WD Services’ ability to win contracts to administer and manage programs traditionally administered by government employees is also dependent on the impact of government unions. Many WD Services government employees belong to labor unions with considerable financial resources and lobbying networks. Union opposition could result in our losing government contracts, being precluded from providing services under government contracts, or maintaining or renewing existing contracts. If we could not renew certain contracts or obtain new contracts due to opposition political actions, it could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.
If we fail to satisfy our contractual obligations, we could be liable for damages and financial penalties, which may place existing pledged performance and payment bonds at risk as well as harm our ability to keep our existing contracts or obtain new contracts and future bonds.
Our failure to comply with our contractual obligations could, in addition to providing grounds for immediate termination of the contract for cause, negatively impact our financial performance and damage our reputation, which, in turn, could have a


material adverse effect on our ability to maintain current contractssell our services on a profitable basis, if at all. We cannot control reimbursement rates, including Medicare market basket or obtain new contracts. The termination of a contractother rate adjustments. Reimbursement for cause could, for instance, subject us to liabilities for excess costs incurred by a payer in obtaining similar services from another source. In addition, our contracts require us to indemnify payers for our failure to meet standards of care, and some of them contain liquidated damages provisions and financial penalties that we must pay ifprovide is primarily through Medicaid and MCOs and rates can vary state by state and payor by payor. Legislative efforts driving increases in minimum wage levels have been made and continue to be proposed to increase minimum wages in markets in which we breach these contracts.

Our failureoperate, and that could significantly impact the wage rates for personal care attendants we utilize to meet contractual obligations could also resultprovide our personal care services. Further, the continued increase in substantial actualinflation has the potential to continue to drive up costs related to employee wages and consequential financial damages. For example, on January 25, 2018, the MOJ released a report on reoffending statistics for certain offenders who entered probation services during the period October 2015other inputs to March 2016. The report provides statistics for all providers of probationour services including our subsidiary RRP, which is in our WD Services segment. This information isfuel costs. The current payors may be unable or unwilling to increase reimbursement rates sufficiently to offset the second data set that is utilized to determine performance payments under the various providers’ transforming rehabilitation contracts with the MOJ, as the actual rates of recidivism are compared to benchmark rates established by the MOJ. Performance payments and penalties are linked to two separate measures of recidivism - the binary measure and the frequency measure. The binary measure defines the percentage of offenders within a cohort, formed quarterly, who reoffend in the following 12 months. The frequency measure defines the average number of offenses committed by reoffenders within the same 12-month measurement period. The performance for the frequency measure for most providers has been below the benchmarks established by the MOJ. As a result, RRP could be required to make payments to the MOJ and the amountsimpact on us of such payments could be material. The amount of potential payments to the MOJ, if any, under RRP’s contractscost increases or, in cases where payors do increase reimbursement rates, such increases may not occur concurrently with the MOJ cannot be estimated at this time, as the MOJ is reviewing the data to understand the underlying reasons for the increase in certain rates of recidivism and other factors that could impact the contractual measure.

Any acquisitioncosts or integration that we undertake could disrupt our business, not generate anticipated results, dilute stockholder value or have a material adverse impact on our operating results.
We endeavor to ensure our acquisition strategy and alignment of resources serves to enhance shareholder value, which could result infully offset such increases. These changes to our strategy or to the way in which we deploy resources across Providence. We have made, and anticipate that we will continue to make, acquisitions. The Company typically incurs costs related to acquisitions and integrations, including third-party costs, whether or not the acquisition or integration is completed, which can have a material adverse impact on our operating results. The success of an acquisition depends in part on our ability to integrate an acquired company into our business operations. Integration of any acquired companies will place significant demands on our management, systems, internal controls and financial and physical resources. This could require us to incur significant expense for, among other things, hiring additional qualified personnel, retaining professionals to assist in developing the appropriate control systems and expanding our information technology infrastructure. The nature of our business is such that qualified management personnel can be difficult to find. Our inability to manage growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial results.position, results of operations and liquidity.

There can be no assurance thatThe implementation of alternative payment models and the companies acquired will generate income or incur expenses at the historical or projected levels on which we basedtransition of Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries to MCOs may limit our acquisition decisions, that we will be able to maintain or renew the acquired companies’ contracts, that we will be able to realize operatingmarket share and economic efficiencies upon integration of acquired companies or that the acquisitions will notcould adversely affect our resultsrevenues.

Many government and commercial payors are transitioning providers to alternative payment models that are designed to promote cost-efficiency, quality and coordination of operationscare. For example, accountable care organizations, or financial condition. ACOs, seek to motivate hospitals, physician groups, and other providers to organize and coordinate patient care while reducing unnecessary costs. Several states have implemented, or have announced that they plan to implement, accountable care models for their Medicaid populations. If we are not included in these programs, or if ACOs establish programs that overlap with the services provided by us, we are at risk for losing market share and of experiencing a loss of business.

We continually review opportunitiesmay be similarly impacted by increased enrollment of Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries in managed care plans, shifting away from traditional fee-for-service models. Under the Medicare managed care program, also known as Medicare Advantage or MA, the federal government contracts with private health insurers to acquire other businesses that would complement our currentprovide Medicare benefits. Insurers may choose to offer supplemental benefits and impose higher plan costs on beneficiaries. Enrollment in managed Medicaid plans is also growing, as states are increasingly relying on MCOs to deliver Medicaid program services expand our markets or otherwise offer prospectsas a strategy to control costs and manage resources. We may experience increased competition for growth. In connectionmanaged care contracts due to state regulation and limitations. For instance, in October 2018, New York began imposing limits on the number of home healthcare providers with our acquisition strategy, we could issue stock that would dilute existing stockholders’ percentage ownership, or we could incur or assume substantial debt or contingent liabilities. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including, but not limited to, the following:

challenges and unanticipated costs assimilating the acquired operations;
known and unknown legal or financial liabilities associated with an acquisition;
diversion of management’s attention from our core businesses;
adverse effects on existing business relationships with customers;
entering markets in which we have limited or no experience;
potential loss of key employees of purchased organizations;
incurrence of excessive leverage in financing an acquisition;
failure to maintain and renew contracts and other revenue streams of the acquired business;
costs associated with litigation or other claims arising in connection with the acquired company;
unanticipated operating, accounting or management difficulties in connection with an acquisition; and
dilution to our earnings per share.
a managed Medicaid plan can contract. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in overcoming problems encountered in connection with any acquisition or integration and our inability to do so could disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business. Our failure to address these risks or other problems encountered in connection with past or future acquisitions and investments could cause us to fail


to realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or investments, incur unanticipated liabilities and harm our business generally.
We may be unable to realize the benefits of any strategic initiatives that are adopted by the Company.

From time to time we may launch strategic initiatives in order to enhance shareholder value. For example, in 2017, NET Services pursued a strategic initiative to enhance member satisfaction and drive greater operational efficiencies. The implementation of the initiative is expectedefforts to be substantially completed by the end of 2018. Alsoincluded in 2017, in order to build upon its leadership position in the UK employment services industry, enhance client satisfaction and drive greater operational efficiencies, WD Services substantially completed the Ingeus Futures program. In addition, we are actively evaluating the optimal industry sectors, such as the non-emergency medical transportation industry and others in which businesses complementary to our NET Services business operate, around which to focus our go-forward merger and acquisition activity, in an attempt to direct our capital towards those areas most likely to drive long-term value creation and generate the highest levels of return for our shareholders. The outcome of this active evaluation may impact the extent and manner in which we deploy resources across Providence, including strategic and administrative resources between Corporate and Other and our operating segments. There can be no assurance as to whether any strategic initiatives will be adopted as a result of this evaluation, and the outcome of any current or future strategic initiatives is uncertain.

Our investments in any joint ventures and unconsolidated entities could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on our joint venture partners’ financial condition, any disputes that may arise between us and our joint venture partners and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of our joint venture partners.
We currently hold a noncontrolling interest in Matrix, which constitutes 24.0% of our consolidated assets. We do not have unilateral power to direct the activities that most significantly impact such business’ economic performance. Our future growth may depend, in part, on future similar arrangements, any of which could be material to our financial condition and results of operations. These arrangements involve risks not present with respect to our wholly-owned subsidiaries, which may negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations or make the arrangements less successful than anticipated, including the following:

we may be unable to take actions that we believe are appropriate but are opposed by our joint venture partners under arrangements that require us to cede or share decision-making authority over major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the joint venture and any property owned by the joint venture, such as the sale or financing of the business or the making of additional capital contributions for the benefit of the business;
our joint venture partners may take actions that we oppose;
we may be unable to sell or transfer our interest in a joint venture to a third party if we fail to obtain the prior consent of our joint venture partners;
our joint venture partners may become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions, which could adversely impact the joint venture or increase our financial commitment to the joint venture;
our joint venture partners may have business interests or goals with respect to a business that conflict with our business interests and goals, including with respect to the timing, terms and strategies for investment, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the business;
disagreements with our joint venture partners could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our officers and directors, and disrupts the day-to-day operations of the business, including the delay of important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and
we may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by our joint venture partners with respect to our joint venture investments.
We derive a significant amount of our revenues from a few payers, which puts our financial condition and results of operations at risk. Any changes in the funding, financial viability or our relationships with these payers could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
We generate a significant amount of the revenues in our segments from a few payers under a small number of contracts. For example, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we generated 46.7%, 47.9% and 54.6%, respectively, of our consolidated revenue from ten payers. Additionally, five payers related to NET Services represented, in the aggregate, 36.1%, 35.6% and 39.2%, respectively, of NET Services revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. A single payer related to WD Services represented 27.1%, 28.9% and 40.0% of our WD Services revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Additionally, a single payer related to Matrix represented 30.9%, 27.8% and 31.1% of Matrix revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The loss of, reduction in amounts generated by, or changes in methods or regulations governing payments for our services under these contracts could have a material adverse impact on our


revenue and results of operations. In addition, any consolidation of any of our private payers could increase the impact that any such risks would have on our revenue and results of operations.
If we fail to estimate accurately the cost of performing certain contracts, we may experience reduced or negative margins.
During 2017, 2016 and 2015, 77.9%, 78.3% and 83.6% of our NET Services revenue, respectively, was generated under capitated contracts with the remainder generated through FFS and flat fee contracts. WD Services also provides services under FFS and flat fee contracts. Under most of NET Services’ capitated contracts, we assume the responsibility of managing the needs of a specific geographic population by contracting out transportation services to local transportation companies on a per ride or per mile basis. We use “pricing models” to determine applicable contract rates, which take into account factors such as estimated utilization, state specific data, previous experience in the state or with similar services, the medically covered programs outlined in the contract, identified populations to be serviced, estimated volume, estimated transportation provider rates and availability of mass transit. The amount of the fixed per-member, monthly fee is determined in the bidding process, but is predicated on actual historical transportation data for the subject geographic region as provided by the payer, actuarial work performed in-house as well as by third party actuarial firms and actuarial analysis provided by the payer. If the utilization of our services is more than we estimated, the contract may be less profitable than anticipated, or may not be profitable at all. Under our FFS contracts, we receive fees based on our interactions with government-sponsored clients. To earn a profit on these contracts, we must accurately estimate costs incurred in providing services. Our risk relating to these contracts is that our client population is not large enough to cover our fixed costs, such as rent and overhead. Our FFS contracts are not reimbursed on a cost basis and therefore, if we fail to estimate our costs accurately, we may experience reduced margins or losses on these contracts. Revenue under certain contracts may be adjusted prospectively if client volumes are below expectations. If the Company is unable to adjust its costs accordingly, our profitability may be negatively impacted. In addition, certain contracts with state Medicaid agencies are renewable at the state’s option without an adjustment to pricing terms. If such renewed contracts require us to incur higher costs, including inflation or regulatory changes, than originally anticipated, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
In WD Services, we often provide services to a client based on a unit price for delivery of a service or achievement of a defined outcome.  If we fail to estimate costs accurately, we may have minimal ability to change the unit price to ensure profitability. While we may be able to alter our cost structure to reflect lower than anticipated volumes and other changes in service needs, there are certain fixed costs which are difficult to alter while still ensuring we can meet our contractual obligations.  Further, many contracts require us to undertake significant onboarding projects, including making redundancies and changes to properties and IT.  If we fail to anticipate the cost of these change programs, we may be unable to recover startup costs throughout the life of the contract. During the fourth quarter of 2016, WD Services recorded asset impairment charges of $19.6 million, which related, in part, to lower revenue and unanticipated costs for a recent contract. If WD Services continues to experience lower than expected volumes and unfavorable service mix shifts, it could result in additional impairment charges. For more information on the risks related to impairment of goodwill, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our reported financial results could suffer if there is an impairment of long-lived assets.”
We may incur costs before receiving related revenues, which could impact our liquidity.
When we are awarded a contract to provide services, we may incur expenses before we receive any contract payments. These expenses include leasing office space, purchasing office equipment, instituting information technology systems, development of supply chains, hiring personnel and releasing certain personnel. As a result, in certain contracts where the government does not fund program start-up costs, we may be required to make significant investments before receiving any related contract payments or payments sufficient to cover start-up costs. For example, WD Services incurred start-up costs in 2017 related to the UK’s Work and Health Programme, and in 2016 related to the offender rehabilitation program in the UK and start-up costs in France. In addition, payments due to us from payers may be delayed due to billing cycles or as a result of failures to approve government budgets in a timely manner, which may adversely affect our liquidity. Moreover, any resulting mismatch in expenses and revenue, especially under FFS arrangements, could be exacerbated if we fail either to invoice the payer correctly or to collect our fee in a timely manner. Such amounts may exceed our available cash, and any resulting liquidity shortages may require additional financing, which may not be available on satisfactory terms, or at all. This could have a material adverse impact on our ongoing operations and our financial position.
Our business is subject to risks of litigation.
The services we provide are subject to lawsuits and claims. A substantial award payable by the Company could have a material adverse impact on our operations and cash flows, and could adversely impact our ability to continue to purchase appropriate liability insurance. We can be subject to claims for negligence or intentional misconduct (in addition to professional liability type claims) by an employee or a third party we engage to assist with the provision of services, including but not limited to claims arising out of accidents involving vehicle collisions, workforce development placements or CHAs and various claims that could


result from employees or contracted third parties driving to or from interactions with clients or while providing direct client services. We can be subject to employee-related claims such as wrongful discharge, discrimination or a violation of equal employment laws and permitting issues. While we attempt to insure against for these types of claims, damages exceeding our insurance limits or outside our insurance coverage, such as a claim for fraud, certain wage and hour violations or punitive damages, could adversely affect our cash flow and financial condition.
We face risks related to attracting and retaining qualified employees and labor relations.
Our success depends to a significant degree on our ability to identify, attract, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified and experienced professionals who possess the skills and experience necessary to deliver high-quality services to our clients, with the continued contributions of our senior management being especially critical to our success. Our objective of providing the highest quality of service to our clients is a significant consideration when we evaluate the education, experience and qualifications of potential candidates for employment as direct care and administrative staff. A portion of our staff are professionals with requisite educational backgrounds and professional certifications. These employees are in great demand and are likely to remain a limited resource for the foreseeable future.
Our ability to attract and retain employees with the requisite experience and skills depends on several factors including, but not limited to, our ability to offer competitive wages, benefits and professional growth opportunities. While we have established programs to attract new employees and provide incentives to retain existing employees, particularly our senior management, we cannot assure youplan networks, that we will be able to attractsecure favorable contracts with all or some of the MCOs, that our reimbursement under these programs will remain at current levels, that the authorizations for services will remain at current levels or that our profitability will remain at levels consistent with past performance, and if we are not successful in these areas our business could be materially harmed and our financial condition materially adversely affected.

26


In addition, operational processes may not be well defined as a state transitions beneficiaries to managed care. For example, membership, new employeesreferrals and the related authorization for services to be provided may be delayed, which may result in delays in service delivery to customers or retainin payment for services rendered. Difficulties with operational processes may negatively affect our revenue growth rates, cash flow and profitability for services provided. Other alternative payment models, such as value-based billing, capitated rates and per member per month pricing may be required by the government, MCOs and other commercial payors to control their costs while shifting financial risk to us, which could also materially affect our operations and financial condition.

We are limited in our ability to control reimbursement rates received for our services, and if we are not able to maintain or reduce our costs to provide such services, our business could be materially adversely affected.

Medicare and Medicaid are among our most significant payors, and their rates are established through federal and state statutes and regulations. Additionally, reimbursement rates with MCOs and other payors are difficult for us to negotiate as such payors are themselves limited in their ability to control rates and funding received from Medicaid and Medicare and are under pressure to reduce their own costs. We therefore manage our costs to achieve a desired level of profitability, including centralizing various back office processes, using technology to streamline processes and practicing efficient management of our senior management or any other key employees in the future. In particular,workforce. If we are currently seeking to fill several key management positions in our NET Services business, and we expectnot able to continue to needstreamline our processes and reduce our costs, our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Future cost containment initiatives undertaken by private third-party payors, especially if we are unable to attract key employeesmaintain or reduce our cost of services below rates set forth by payors, may limit our future revenue and profitability and cause us to supportexperience reduced or negative margins and our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our commercial payor and managed Medicaid revenue and profitability are affected by continuing efforts of third-party payors to maintain or reduce costs of healthcare by lowering payment rates, narrowing the growthscope and utilization of covered services, increasing case management review of services and negotiating pricing. There can be no assurance that third-party payors will make timely payments for our businesses. Someservices, and there is no assurance that we will continue to maintain our current payor or revenue mix. We will continue our efforts to develop our commercial payor and managed Medicaid sources of the companies with which we compete for experienced personnel may have greater financial, technical, politicalrevenue and marketing resources, name recognition and a larger number of clients and payers than we do, which may prove more attractive to employment candidates. The inability to attract and retain experienced personnelany changes in payment levels from current or future third-party payors could have a material adverse effect on our business.
The performance of each of our business segments also depends on the talents and efforts of our highly skilled information technology professionals. For example, technological improvement is a key component of the strategic initiative at NET Services to enhance member satisfaction and drive greater operational efficiencies and as NET Services expands our transportation network capacity beyond its traditional transportation provider network, increases on-time and on-demand performance, provides real time analytics and minimizes cancellations. Competition for skilled intellectual technology professionals can be intense. Our success depends on our ability to recruit, retain and motivate these individuals.
Effective succession planning is also important to our future success. If we fail to ensure the effective transfer of senior management knowledge and smooth transitions involving senior management, including the appointment of a new chief executive officer for the Company (as our chief executive officer terminated his role during the fourth quarter of 2017) and the transition of several key management positions, including the chief technology officer, in our NET Service business, our ability to execute short and long-term strategic, financial and operating goals, as well as our business,consolidated financial condition, and results of operations generally, could be adversely affected.

In addition, our businesses rely on maintaining strong relationships with our employees and avoiding labor disputes. Certain of our UK employees are members of the NAPO and Unison unions and certain of our employees in France are members of the Confederation Generale du Travail. Unionized employees in both countries have collective bargaining rights. Participation in unions is confidential under European employment laws. While we believe we have good relationships with our employees, both unionized and non-unionized, in the U.S. and internationally, including the unions that represent some of our employees, a work stoppage due to our failure to renegotiate union contracts or for other reasons could have a significant negative effect on us. In addition, should additional portions of our workforce be subject to collective bargaining agreements, this could result in increased costs of doing business as we may be subject to mandatory, binding arbitration of labor scheduling, costs and standards and we may therefore have reduced operating flexibility.
We may have difficulty successfully completing divestitures or exiting businesses.
As demonstrated in 2017 with the sale of our interests in Mission Providence Pty Ltd to Konekt Limited, in 2016 with the Matrix Transaction and in 2015 with the Human Services Sale, we may dispose of all or a portion of our investments or exit businesses based on a variety of factors, including availability of alternative opportunities to deploy capital or otherwise maximize shareholder value as well as other strategic considerations. A divestiture or business termination could result in difficulties in the separation of operations, services, products and personnel, the diversion of management’s attention, the disruption of our business and the potential loss of key employees and customers. A divestiture or business termination may be subject to the satisfaction of pre-closing conditions as well as to obtaining necessary regulatory and government approvals, which, if not satisfied or obtained,


may prevent us from completing the disposition or business termination, whether or not the disposition or business termination has been publicly announced. A divestiture or business termination may also involve continued financial involvement in the divested assets and businesses, such as indemnities or other financial obligations, including continuing obligations to employees, in which the performance of the divested assets or businesses could impact our results of operations. From time to time the Company guarantees the contractual payment or performance obligations of its segments. An inability to obtain waiver or termination of such guarantees may prevent us from completing a disposition or business termination, or may result in continued financial involvement in divested assets and businesses. Further, such divestitures may result in proceeds to us in an amount less than we expect or less than our assessment of the value of those assets. Any sale of our assets could result in a loss on divestiture. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The indemnification provisions of acquisition and disposition agreements by which we have acquired or sold companies may result in liabilities.
We rely heavily on the representations and warranties and related indemnities provided to us by the sellers of acquired companies, including as they relate to creation, ownership and rights in intellectual property and compliance with laws and contractual requirements. However, the liability of the former owners is limited under the relevant acquisition agreements, and certain sellers may be unable to meet their indemnification responsibilities. Similarly, the purchasers of our divested operations may from time to time agree to indemnify us for operations of such businesses after the closing. We cannot be assured that any of these indemnification provisions will fully protect us, and as a result we may face unexpected liabilities that adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
In addition, we have provided certain indemnifications in connection with the Human Services Sale in 2015 and the Matrix Transaction in 2016. To the extent we choose to divest other operations of our businesses in the future, we expect to provide certain indemnifications in connection with these divestitures. We may face liabilities in connection with these current or future indemnification obligations that may adversely affect our consolidated results of operation, financial condition and cash flows. We have entered into a settlement with Molina Healthcare Inc. (“Molina”), the purchaser of our former Human Services segment, regarding the settlement of certain potential indemnification claims. As of December 31, 2017, the accrual is $15.0 million with respect to an estimate of loss for such potential indemnification claims.  Litigation is inherently uncertain, and the losses incurred in the event that the legal proceedings related to such claims were to result in unfavorable outcomes could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial performance. For more information on these potential indemnification obligations, see Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies, to our consolidated financial statements.
Our success depends on our ability to compete effectively in the marketplace.
We compete for clients and for contracts with a variety of organizations that offer similar services. Many organizations of varying sizes compete with us, including local not-for-profit organizations and community-based organizations, larger companies, organizations that currently provide or may begin to provide similar NET management services (including transportation network companies like Uber and Lyft), and large multi-national corporations that currently provide or may begin to provide workforce development services and CHA providers. Some of these companies may have greater financial, technical, political, marketing, name recognition and other resources and a larger number of clients or payers than we do. In addition, some of these companies offer more services than we do. To remain competitive, we must provide superior services and performance on a cost-effective basis to our customers.

The market in which we operate is influenced by technological developments that affect cost-efficiency and quality of services, and the needs of our customers change and evolve regularly. Accordingly, our success depends on our ability to develop services that address these changing needs and to provide technology needed to deliver these services on a cost-effective basis. Our competitors may better utilize technology to change the way services in our industry are designed and delivered and they may be able to provide our customers with different or greater capabilities than we can provide, including better contract terms, technical qualifications, price and availability of qualified professional personnel. In addition, new or disruptive technologies and methodologies by our competitors may make our services uncompetitive.

In conjunction with our initiatives to improve cost-efficiency, we incur substantial costs to develop technology, which may not ultimately serve our business purposes or lower costs. For example, in 2016, WD Services incurred a write-off of in-process technology of $3.1 million related to our legal offender rehabilitation services, as it was determined the system would not meet our business needs. As of December 31, 2017, NET Services has incurred $11.9 million of development in progress costs related to its LCAD NextGen technology system, which is a critical component of its initiative to progress towards an industry-leading call center and reservation scheduling platform, improve member communication, accessibility, and satisfaction, optimize the utilization of our extensive network of transportation providers and build the foundation for additional analytical capabilities.


The system has not been placed into service, and a review of the project is ongoing. In addition, we made a cost-method investment of $3.0 million during 2017, in Circulation, a technology-based transportation services provider.

We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, competition from new entrants into the markets in which we operate. Increased competition may result in pricing pressures, loss of or failure to gain market share or loss of or failure to gain clients or payers, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Our business may also be adversely affected by the consolidation of competitors, which may result in increased pricing pressure or negotiating leverage with payers, or by the provision of our services by payers or clients directly, including through the acquisition of competitors.

We may be adversely impactedaffected by inadequacies in, or security breaches of, our information technology systems.systems, including the systems intended to protect our clients’ privacy and confidential information, which could lead to legal liability, adversely affect our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our information technology, or IT, systems are critically important to our operations and we must implement and maintain appropriate and sufficient infrastructure and IT systems to support growth and our existing business processes. We provide services to individuals including servicesand others that require us to collect, process, maintain and retain sensitive and personal client confidential information in our computer systems, including patient identifiable health information, relating to their health, social security numbersfinancial information and other identifyingpersonal information about our customers and end-users, such as names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, identification numbers, sensitive health data, and payment account information. As a result, we are subject to complex and evolving United States privacy laws and regulations, including those pertaining to the handling of personal data, such as HIPAA, CCPA, and others. Most states have enacted laws, which vary significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, to safeguard the privacy and security of personal information. An increasing number of states require that impacted individuals and regulatory authorities be notified if a security breach results in the unauthorized access to, or use or disclosure of, personal information. Notifications are also required under HIPAA to the extent there is unauthorized access to, or use or disclosure of, personal health information. California residents and households in particular are afforded significantly expanded privacy protections under the CCPA. The enacted laws often provide for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that may increase data breach litigation. Further, while we are using internal and external resources to monitor compliance with and to continue to modify our data processing practices and policies in order to comply with evolving privacy laws, relevant regulatory authorities could determine that our data handling practices fail to address all the requirements of certain new laws, which could subject us to penalties and/or litigation. In addition, there is no assurance that our security controls over personal data, the training of employees and vendors on data privacy and data security, and the policies, procedures and practices we implemented or may implement in the future will prevent the improper disclosure of personal data. Therefore,Improper disclosure of personal data in violation of the CCPA and/or of other personal data protection laws could harm our information technology systems store client information protected by numerous federal, statereputation, cause loss of consumer confidence, subject us to government enforcement actions (including fines), or result in private litigation against us, which could result in loss of revenue, increased costs, liability for monetary damages, fines and/or
27


criminal prosecution, all of which could adversely affect our business, consolidated results of operations, financial condition and foreign regulations. cash flows.

We also rely on our information technologyIT systems (some of which are outsourced to third parties) to manage the data, communications and business processes for all other business functions, including our marketing, sales, logistics, customer service, accounting and administrative functions. Further,Furthermore, our systems include interfaces to third-party stakeholders, often connected via the Internet.internet. In addition, certainsome of our services or information related to our services are carried out or hosted within our customers’ IT systems, and any failure or weaknesses in their IT systems may negatively impact our ability to deliver the services, for which we may not receive relief from contractual performance obligations or compensation for services provided. In addition, security incidents impacting other companies, such as our vendors, may allow cybercriminals to obtain personal information about our customers and employees. Cybercriminals may then use this information to, among other things, attempt to gain unauthorized access to our customers’ accounts, which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business and results of operations or financial condition. As a result of the data we maintain and third-party access, we are subject to increasing cybersecurity risks.risks associated with malicious cyber-attacks intended to gain access to protected personal information. The nature of our business, where services are often performed outside a secured location,of locations where network security can be assured, adds additional risk.
If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build, sustain and protect an appropriate technology infrastructure, our business or financial results could be negatively impacted.

Furthermore, computer hackers and data thieves are increasingly sophisticated and operate large scale and complex automated attacks, and our information technology systems may be vulnerable to material security breaches (including the access to or acquisition of customer, employee or other confidential data), cyber-based attackscyber-attacks or other material system failures.failures arising out of malware or ransomware attacks, denial of services, or other attacks or security incidents, any of which could adversely impact our operations and financial results, our relationships with business partners and customers, and our reputation. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or sabotage systems change frequently and may be difficult to detect for long periods of time, we may be unable to implement adequate preventative measures sufficient to prevent a breach of our systems and protect sensitive data.data, including confidential personal information. Any breach of our data security could result in an unauthorized release or transfer of customer or employee information, or the loss of valuable business data or cause a disruption in our business. A failure to prevent, detect and respond in a timely manner to a major breach of our data security or to other cybersecurity threats could result in system disruption, business continuity issues or compromised data integrity. These events or any other failure to safeguard personal data could give rise to unwanted media attention, damage our reputation, damage our customer relationships and result in lost sales, fines or lawsuits. We may also be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against or respond to or alleviate problems caused by a security breach. If we are unable to prevent material failures, our operations may be impacted, and we may suffer other negative consequences such as reputational damage, litigation, remediation costs, a requirement not to operate our business until defects are remedied, or penalties under various data privacy laws and regulations, any of which could detrimentally affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

FailureWe may be more vulnerable to protectthe effects of a public health emergency than other businesses due to the nature of our client’s privacyend-users and confidential informationthe physical proximity required by our operations, which could leadharm our business disproportionately to legal liability,other businesses.

The majority of our end-users are older individuals with complex medical challenges or multiple ongoing diseases or chronic illnesses, many of whom may be more vulnerable than the general public during a pandemic or in a public health emergency. Our employees are also at greater risk of contracting contagious diseases due to their increased exposure to vulnerable end-users. Our employees could also have difficulty attending to our end-users if a program of social distancing or quarantine is instituted in response to a public health emergency, or if “stay at home” orders are perpetuated or reinitiated. In addition, we may expand existing internal policies in a manner that may have a similar effect. If the COVID-19 virus and its potentially more contagious variants cause an additional resurgence of infections of COVID-19, or if new variants continue to develop that are resistant to government approved COVID-19 vaccinations, or if an influenza or other pandemic were to occur, we could suffer significant losses to our consumer population or a willingness by our end-users to utilize our services, in particular in our PCS segment, or a reduction in the availability of our employees and, at an inflated cost, we could be required to hire replacements for affected workers. Accordingly, public health emergencies could have a disproportionate material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.






28


Risks Related to Our Business and Operations

We derive a significant amount of our revenues from a limited number of payors, and any changes in the funding, financial viability or our relationships with these payors could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

We generate a significant amount of our revenue from a limited number of payors under a relatively small number of contracts. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2023, approximately 30.9% of our NEMT segment revenue was derived from only five payors, and one of which, a single state Medicaid agency, contributed 11.2% to our aggregate NEMT segment revenue during that period. As it relates to our other segments, for the year ended December 31, 2023, approximately 11.3% of our PCS segment revenue was derived from one U.S. state Medicaid program, and approximately 18.5% of our RPM segment revenue was derived from one health plan. The loss of, reduction in amounts generated by, or changes in methods or regulations governing payments for our services under these contracts could have a material adverse impact on our revenue and results of operations. In addition, any consolidation of any of our private payors could increase the impact that any such risks would have on our revenue, financial position, and results of operations.

Delays in collection, or non-collection, of our accounts receivable, particularly during any business integration process, could adversely affect our reputationbusiness, financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

Prompt billing and collection are important factors in our liquidity. Billing and collection of our accounts receivable are subject to the complex regulations that govern Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and rules imposed by nongovernment payors. Our inability to bill and collect on a timely basis pursuant to these regulations and rules could subject us to payment delays that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition andposition, results of operations.operations and liquidity. It is possible that documentation support, system problems, Medicare, Medicaid or other payor issues, particularly in markets transitioning to managed care for the first time, or industry trends may extend our collection period, which may materially adversely affect our working capital, and our working capital management procedures may not successfully mitigate this risk.


We retain confidential informationThe timing of payments made under the Medicare and Medicaid programs is subject to governmental budgetary constraints, resulting in our computer systems, including personal information about our customers, such as names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, identification numbersan increased period of time between submission of claims and subsequent payment account information. Malicious cyber attacks to gain access to personal information affect many companies across various industries, including ours. Pursuant to federalunder specific programs, most notably under the Medicaid and state laws, various government agencies have established rules protecting the privacy and security of personal information.Medicaid managed programs. In addition, most states have enacted laws, which vary significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, to safeguard the privacy and security of personal information. An increasing number of states require that customers be notified ifwe may experience delays in reimbursement as a security breach results in the inappropriate disclosure of personally identifiable customer information. Any compromiseresult of the securityfailure to receive prompt approvals related to change of ownership applications for acquired or other facilities or from delays caused by our or other third parties’ information system failures. We may also experience delayed payment of reimbursement rate increases that are subject to the approval of the CMS and/or various state agencies before claims can be submitted or paid at the new rates. Any delays experienced for the foregoing or other reasons could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Further, a delay in collecting our accounts receivable, or the non-collection of accounts receivable in connection with our transition and integration of acquired companies and the attendant movement of underlying billing and collection operations from legacy systems to our systems thatcould have a material negative impact on our results in the disclosure of personally identifiable customeroperations and liquidity.

Our reported financial results could suffer if there is an impairment of goodwill or employee information or inadvertent disclosure of any clients’ personal information could damage our reputation, deter people from using our services, expose us to litigation, increase regulatory scrutiny and require us to incur significant technical, legal and other expenses. In addition, data breaches impacting other companies, such as our vendors, may allow cybercriminals to obtain personally identifiable information about our customers. Cybercriminals may then use this information to, among other things, attempt to gain unauthorized access to our customers’ accounts,long-lived assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, results of operations orand financial condition.



We are required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, to review the carrying value of long-lived assets to be used in operations whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may be impaired. Factors that may necessitate an impairment assessment include, among others, significant adverse changes in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, significant adverse changes in legal factors or the business climate that could affect the value of an asset or significant declines in the observable market value of an asset. Where the presence or occurrence of those events indicates that an asset may be impaired, we assess its recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of the asset exceeds the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset over the remaining economic life of the asset. If such testing indicates the carrying value of the asset is not recoverable, we estimate the fair value of the asset using appropriate valuation methodologies, which would typically include an estimate of discounted cash flows. If the fair value of those assets is less than carrying value, we record an impairment loss equal to the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value. The use of different estimates or assumptions in determining the fair value of our intangible assets may result in different values for those assets, which could result in an impairment or, in the period in which an impairment is recognized, could result in a materially different impairment charge.


29


In addition, goodwill may be impaired if the estimated fair value of our reporting units is less than the carrying value of the respective reporting unit. As a result of our growth, in part through acquisitions, goodwill and other intangible assets represent a significant portion of our assets. From our largest acquisitions, goodwill generated in relation to the acquisition of Simplura in 2020 was $320.4 million, goodwill generated in relation to the acquisition of Care Finders in 2021 was $232.1 million, goodwill generated in relation to the acquisition of VRI in 2021 was $236.3 million, and goodwill generated in relation to the acquisition of GMM in 2022 was $44.3 million. We perform an analysis on our goodwill balances to test for impairment on an annual basis. Interim impairment tests may also be required in advance of our annual impairment test if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value, including goodwill, of our reporting unit below the reporting unit’s carrying value. Such circumstances could include: (1) loss of significant contracts; (2) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the climate of our business; (3) unanticipated competition; (4) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; or (5) a significant decline in our stock price.

During our July 1 annual assessment of goodwill, we determined that based on our qualitative assessment for each reporting unit, factors existed which required us to test our goodwill for impairment. These factors included a decline in the market price of the Company's common stock, industry specific regulatory pressures such as Medicaid redetermination and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") proposed ruling on Ensuring Access to Medicaid Services, and general economic and market volatility. As a result of our quantitative assessment, we determined that the goodwill at our PCS and RPM reporting units was impaired. As a result, we recorded an impairment of goodwill charge of $183.1 million in the second quarter of 2023, of which $137.3 million was recorded at our PCS segment and $45.8 million was recorded at our RPM segment.

As of December 31, 2023, the carrying value of goodwill, intangibles, equity method investments, and property and equipment, net was $785.6 million, $360.9 million, $41.5 million and $85.6 million, respectively. We continue to monitor the carrying value of these long-lived assets. If future conditions are different from management’s estimates at the time of an acquisition or market conditions change subsequently, we may incur future charges for impairment of our goodwill, intangible assets, equity method investments or property and equipment, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial position.

Failure to maintain or to develop further reliable, efficient and secure information technologyIT systems would be disruptive to our operations and diminish our ability to compete and successfully grow our business successfully.business.


We are highly dependent on efficient and uninterrupted performance of our information technologyIT and business systems. These systems quote, process and service our business, and perform financial functions necessary for pricing and service delivery. These systems must also be able to undergo periodic modifications and improvements without interruptions or untimely delays in service. Additionally, our ability to integrate our systems with those of our clients is critical to our success. Our information systems rely on the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources to maintain and enhance existing systems as well as develop and create new systems to keep pace with continuing changes in information processing technology or evolving industry and regulatory requirements. However,Nevertheless, we still rely on manual processes and procedures, including accounting, reporting and consolidation processes that may result in errors and may not scale proportionately with our business growth.growth, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


A failure or delay to achieve improvements in our information technologyIT platforms could interrupt certain processes or degrade business operations and could place us at a competitive disadvantage. If we are unable to implement appropriate systems, procedures and controls, we may not be able to successfully offer our services and grow our business and account for transactions in an appropriate and timely manner, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


There areWe face risks associated withrelated to attracting and retaining qualified employees, which could harm our international operations that are different from the risks associated withbusiness and have a material adverse effect on our operations in the U.S., and our exposureresults of operations.

Our business success depends, to the risks of a global market could hindersignificant degree, on our ability to maintainidentify, attract, develop, motivate and expand international operations.retain highly qualified and experienced employees who possess the skills and experience necessary to deliver high-quality services to our clients, with the continued contributions of our senior management being especially critical to our success. Our objective of providing the highest quality of service to our clients is a significant consideration when we evaluate the education, experience and qualifications of potential candidates for employment as direct care and administrative staff. A portion of our staff is made up of professionals with requisite educational backgrounds and professional certifications. These employees are in great demand and are likely to remain a limited resource for the foreseeable future, exacerbated by continued labor shortages in the current economy.

We
30


Our ability to attract and retain employees with the requisite experience and skills depends on several factors, including our ability to offer competitive wages, benefits and professional growth opportunities. While we have operation centersestablished programs to attract new employees and provide incentives to retain existing employees, particularly our senior management, we cannot assure you that we will be able to attract new employees or retain the services of our senior management or any other key employees in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland, the UKfuture. Some of the companies with which we compete for experienced personnel may have greater financial, technical, political and the U.S.marketing resources, name recognition and a noncontrolling interest inlarger number of clients and payors than we do, which may prove more attractive to employment candidates. The inability to attract and retain experienced personnel could have a joint venture in Spain. In implementingmaterial adverse effect on our international strategy,business.

The performance of our business also depends on the talents and efforts of our highly skilled IT professionals. Our success depends on our ability to recruit, retain and motivate these individuals. Effective succession planning is also important to our future success. If we may face barriersfail to entryensure the effective transfer of senior management knowledge and competition from local companiessmooth transitions involving senior management, our ability to execute short and other companies that already have established global businesses,long-term strategic, financial and operating goals, as well as our business, financial condition and results of operations generally, could be materially adversely affected.

Any acquisition or acquisition integration efforts that we undertake could disrupt our business, not generate anticipated results, dilute stockholder value and have a material adverse impact on our operating results.

Our growth strategy involves the risks generally associatedevaluation of potential entry into complementary markets and service lines through acquisition, particularly with conductingopportunities that may leverage the advantages inherent in our large-scale technology-enabled operations and networks. We have made acquisitions and anticipate that we will continue to consider and pursue strategic acquisition opportunities, the success of which depends in part on our ability to integrate an acquired company into our business internationally.operations. Integration of any acquired company will place significant demands on our management, systems, internal controls and financial and physical resources. This could require us to incur significant expense for, among other things, hiring additional qualified personnel, retaining professionals to assist in developing the appropriate control systems and expanding our IT infrastructure. The successnature of our business is such that qualified management personnel can be difficult to find. Our inability to manage growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

For example, the successful integration of Care Finders into our PCS segment and profitabilitythe remote patient monitoring business acquired in the VRI transaction and expanded with the GMM acquisition and our ability to realize the expected benefits of international operationsthe acquisition are subject to numerousa number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control, such as:including:


political or economic instability;
changes in governmental regulation or taxation;
currency exchange fluctuations;
difficultiesthe challenges and unanticipated costs of staffing and managing operations in certain foreign countries, including potential pension and social plan liabilities;
work stoppages or other changes in labor conditions; and
taxesassociated with integrating complex organizations, systems, operating procedures, compliance programs, technology, networks and other restrictions on repatriating foreign profits backassets;
the difficulties harmonizing differences in the business cultures;
the inability to successfully combine our respective businesses in a manner that permits us to achieve the cost savings and other anticipated benefits from the acquisitions;
the challenges associated with known and unknown legal or financial liabilities associated with the acquisitions;
the risk of entering markets in which we have little or no experience;
the challenges associated with the incurrence of indebtedness and the assumption of new contracts associated with the acquisitions;
the inability to minimize the diversion of management attention from ongoing business concerns during the process of integrating our businesses;
the inability to resolve potential conflicts that may arise relating to customer, supplier and other important relationships;
the difficulties in retaining key management and other key employees; and
the challenge of managing the expanded operations of a larger and more complex company and coordinating geographically separate organizations.

We incurred substantial expenses to complete the acquisitions, but we may not realize the anticipated cost benefits and other benefits to the U.S.
In addition, changesextent expected, on the timeline expected, or at all. Moreover, competition in policies or laws of the U.S. or foreign governments resulting in, among other changes, higher taxation, tariffs or similar protectionist laws could reducethis industry may also cause us not to fully realize the anticipated benefits of internationalthe acquisitions.

There can also be no assurance that the companies we acquire, will generate income or incur expenses at the historical or projected levels on which we based our acquisition decisions, that we will be able to maintain or renew the acquired companies’ contracts, that we will be able to realize operating and economic efficiencies upon integration of acquired companies or that the acquisitions will not adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

31


In addition, as we expand our markets or otherwise take advantage of prospects for growth, in connection with our acquisition strategy, we could issue stock that could dilute existing stockholders’ percentage ownership, or we could incur or assume substantial debt or contingent liabilities. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in overcoming problems encountered in connection with any acquisition or integration and our inability to do so could disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business. Our failure to address these risks or other problems encountered in connection with past or future acquisitions and investments could cause us to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or investments, incur unanticipated liabilities and harm our business generally.

Weakening of general economic, political, credit and/or capital market conditions in the markets in which we do business could adversely affect our financial performance, our ability to grow or sustain our business, financial condition, and results of operations, and our ability to access capital markets.

The implications of the current macroeconomic environment, which is characterized by high inflation rates, high interest rates, supply chain challenges, labor shortages, volatility in capital markets and growing recession risk, have a materialhad and could continue to have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In April 2022, during the COVID-19 pandemic, inflation rates in the United States were the highest they had been since 1981.While post-pandemic inflation rates have decreased since April 2022, there can be no assurance that inflation rates will not increase in the future.Increased inflation rates could result in higher costs related to employee wages and other inputs to our services, including fuel costs, and could result in us incurring higher debt obligations than expected.If we incur higher costs than originally anticipated, including under our FFS contracts, and are unable to adjust the rates to reflect the changes in costs due to the structure of our contracts, our results of operations and financial condition. We have currency exposure arising from both salescondition may be adversely affected.

Further the growing recession risk and purchases denominatedongoing economic uncertainty may lead to increased credit risk, higher borrowing costs, or reduced availability of capital and credit markets, which could impact our access to financing in foreign currencies, including intercompany transactions outside the U.S.,credit and capital markets at reasonable rates in the event we currentlyfind it desirable to do not conduct hedging activities. The valueso. Higher interest rates and borrowing costs as well as increased costs of labor as a result of the U.S. dollar against other foreign currencies has seentight labor market, particularly in the healthcare industry, could create additional economic challenges. With the majority of our payors being governmental healthcare agencies who are also under significant volatility recently. operational and budgetary strain, these significantly increased labor and supply costs without a commensurate increase in revenue may lead to a continued deterioration of operating margins across our business.

Our financial condition and results of operations are reported in multiple currencies, and are then translated into U.S. dollars at the applicable exchange rate for inclusion in our consolidated financial statements. Appreciation of the U.S. dollar against these other currencies will have a negative impact on our reported net revenue and operatingestimated income while depreciation of the U.S. dollar against such currencies will have a positive effect on reported net revenue and operating income. We cannot predict with precision the effect of future exchange-rate fluctuations on our business and operating results, and significant rate fluctuationstaxes could be materially different from income taxes that we ultimately pay, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Our resultstotal income tax provision is based on our taxable income and the tax laws in the various jurisdictions in which we operate or operated. Significant judgment and estimation is required in determining our annual income tax expense and in evaluating our tax positions and related matters. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determinations are uncertain or otherwise subject to interpretation. In addition, we make or were required to make judgments regarding the applicability of tax treaties and the appropriate application of transfer pricing regulations with respect to the operations will continueof our former workforce development services segment. In the event one taxing jurisdiction disagrees with another taxing jurisdiction with respect to fluctuate duethe amount or applicability of a particular type of tax, or the amount or availability of a particular type of tax refund or credit, we could experience temporary or permanent double taxation and increased professional fees to seasonality.resolve such taxation matters.

NET Services operating resultsOur determination of our income tax liability is subject to review by applicable tax authorities, and operating cash flows normally fluctuatewe have been audited by various jurisdictions in prior years. We were examined by the Internal Revenue Service as a result of seasonal variationsthe large refunds received from the loss on the sale or our former workforce development services segment. This examination was completed in the third quarter of 2021 with no material adjustments being made. In addition, we were examined by various states and by the Saudi Arabian tax authorities with respect to these matters. Although we believe our income tax estimates and related determinations are reasonable and appropriate, relevant taxing authorities may disagree. The ultimate outcome of any such audits and reviews could be materially different from the estimates and determinations reflected in our business. Duehistorical income tax provisions and accruals.

Our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by pandemic infectious diseases, including the COVID-19 pandemic, including our contact center employees who may be disproportionately impacted by health epidemics or pandemics like COVID-19, which could disrupt our business and adversely affect our financial results.

The widespread outbreak of an illness or any other communicable disease, or any other public health crisis that results in economic disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic, could materially adversely affect our business and results of
32


operations. COVID-19 and its potentially more contagious variants specifically, as well as measures taken by governmental authorities and private actors to limit the spread of the virus, have interfered with, and may continue to interfere with, the ability of our employees, suppliers, transportation providers and other business providers to carry out their assigned tasks at ordinary levels of performance relative to the conduct of our business, which may cause us to materially curtail portions of our business operations. The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business will depend on a number of evolving factors that we may not be able to predict, including:

the duration and scope of the pandemic;
governmental, business and individuals’ actions that have been and continue to be taken in response to the pandemic;
the impact of the pandemic on economic activity and actions taken in response;
the effect on our customers and members and customer and member demand for our services, in particular with respect to our PCS segment services;
our ability to provide our services as a result of, among other things, travel restrictions, disruptions in our contact centers related to COVID-19, people working from homeand taking the opportunity to provide personal care services that we might otherwise provide through our PCS segment, and the willingness of our employees to return to work due to health concerns, childcare issues or enhanced unemployment benefits, including after “shelter in place” and other related “stay at home restrictions” are lifted or modified;
issues with respect to our employees’ health, working hours and/or ability to perform their duties;
increased costs to us in response to these changing conditions and to protect the health and safety of our employees, including increased spending for hazard pay and personal protective equipment; and
the ability of our payors to pay for our services.

Furthermore, any failure to appropriately respond, or the perception of an inadequate response, could cause reputational harm and/or subject us to claims and litigation, either of which could result in a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

When the COVID-19 pandemic emerged in March 2020, we observed a material reduction in trip volume in our NEMT segment as a result of state imposed public health orders. On May 11, 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") declared the end of the public health emergency ("PHE") for the COVID-19 pandemic. During each year following the emergence of the pandemic, we have continued to experience increased utilization and are currently operating at a higher volume of trips in our NEMT segment than before the COVID-19 outbreak. While this increase in trip volume shows increased demand for our services, it also exposes the Company to cost containment risk as labor costs and trip costs are rising at a higher rate than reimbursement, which results in lower profit margins than previously. The increase in trip costs is driven, in part, by the current macroeconomic environment, inflationary pressures, rising interest rates, higher labor costs, and supply chain challenges which limit the NEMT segment's ability to provide services at a reasonable cost to achieve historic profit margins. These macroeconomic trends also put pressure on the availability of transportation providers. Any ongoing impact to our industry as a result of the increased demand despite the headwinds in the summer monthscurrent macroeconomic environment may have a negative financial impact on our transportation providers and may result in lower revenues as the Company adapts to this change in demand for transportation services. As volumes continue to increase, the availability of transportation providers in the winter months, coupled with a primarily fixed revenue stream based on a per-member, per-month payment structure, NET Services normally experiences lower operating margins during the summer season and higher operating margins during the winter season. WD Services typically does not experience seasonal fluctuations in operating results. However, volatility in revenue and earnings is common in the case of WD Servicesfuture may be limited due to the timingcapacity constraints within our network of commencementtransportation providers. Additionally, we may face staffing difficulties in our contact centers as the recruitment of potential employees may be challenging amid the current labor environment, which could negatively impact the customer and expirationmember experience while interfacing with our contact centers and materially adversely affect our reputation and results of certain major contracts as well as fluctuations in referrals provided by its customers.operations.




Our reportedPCS segment also experienced a material reduction in volume of service hours and visits as a result of the pandemic. While this reduction in service hours and visits has continued to improve each year following the pandemic, ongoing impacts of the pandemic including constraints on the labor market, specifically related to strain on healthcare professionals, has led to a shortage of caregivers which will continue to impact the volume of service hours that can be provided. Further, these labor constraints have driven increased wage rates, which limits the Company's ability to be profitable in contracts with set rates for various care services. Any depressed volumes as a result of the labor shortage and the strain on healthcare professionals could reduce the quality with which our caregivers provide services and could result in lower than expected revenue in the PCS segment. As volume continues to increase, we may face difficulty meeting the volume of demand due to staffing challenges in the healthcare industry. Any of these circumstances and factors could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our RPM segment has not experienced a direct material impact to operations or financial activity as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. While this segment of the business has proven resilient given the increase in demand for remote healthcare services in a highly contagious infection environment, potential risks could arise that could have a material impact on the financial results of the segment. Specifically, given the strain on the healthcare professionals that serve the healthcare
33


community, we could suffer if there is an impairmentexperience shortages in qualified medical professionals that support our remote care monitoring business. Further, as this segment relies on patients receiving health monitoring devices for use in-home, any impact to the supply chain that ensures these critical devices arrive for active and continued vitals monitoring and data analytic solutions could have a negative impact on our business. Any of long-lived assets.these factors could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and business.

GoodwillThe uncertainty and volatility of NEMT trip volume and PCS volume of hours provided due to COVID-19 and the long-term impacts of the pandemic on the global economy can affect the assumptions we rely upon to develop our expense estimates relative to the operations of these business segments. If we do not accurately estimate costs incurred in providing these services, these segments may be impaired ifimpacted by out of period adjustments to actual results. Any or all of these factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, the estimated fair valueimpact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the long-term effects of the pandemic are continuously evolving, and the continuation of the pandemic, any additional resurgence, or COVID-19 variants could precipitate or aggravate the other risk factors included in this Annual Report, which in turn could further materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, and profitability, including in ways that are not currently known to us or that we do not currently consider to present significant risks.

Our contact centers typically seat a significant number of employees in one location. Accordingly, an outbreak or resurgence of a contagious infection or virus, such as COVID-19or its potentially more contagious and/or vaccine resistant variants, in one or more of our reporting units is less than the carrying value of the respective reporting unit. As alocations in which we do business may result in significant worker absenteeism, lower capacity utilization rates, voluntary or mandatory closure of our growth, in part through acquisitions, goodwillcontact centers, transportation restrictions that could make it difficult for our employees to commute to work, travel restrictions on our employees, and other intangible assets representdisruptions to our business. Any prolonged or widespread health epidemic could severely disrupt our business operations and have a significant portion of our assets. We perform an analysismaterial adverse effect on our goodwill balancesbusiness, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to test for impairmentOur NEMT Segment

There can be no assurance that our contracts will survive as contemplated until the end of their stated terms, or that upon their expiration will be renewed or extended on an annual basis. Interim impairment tests may also be required in advance of our annual impairment testsatisfactory terms, if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value, including goodwill, of one or more of our reporting units below the reporting unit’s carrying value. Such circumstances could include but are not limited to: (1) loss of significant contracts, (2) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the climate of our business, (3) unanticipated competition, (4) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator or (5) a significant decline in our stock price. In the fourth quarter of 2016, we recorded asset impairment charges of $19.6 million related to WD Servicesat all, and an asset impairment of $1.4 million for Corporate and Other relateddisruptions to, the saleearly expiration or renegotiation of, a building, as discussed below in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates”. As of December 31, 2017,or the carrying value of goodwill, intangibles and property and equipment, net is $121.7 million, $43.9 million and $50.4 million, respectively. In addition, property and equipment as of December 31, 2017 includes $13.4 million of construction and development in progress, primarily relatedfailure to NET Services’ LCAD NextGen technology system, as discussed above. We continue to monitor the carrying value of these long-lived assets. Any future impairment chargesrenew our contracts could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our NEMT segment contracts are subject to frequent renewal and, from time to time, requests for renegotiation during a contract term. For example, many of our state Medicaid contracts, which represented approximately 37.1% of our NEMT segment revenue for the year ended December 31, 2023, have terms ranging from three to five years and are typically subject to a competitive procurement process near the end of the term. We also contract with MCOs, which represented approximately 62.9% of our NEMT segment revenue for the year ended December 31, 2023. Our MCO contracts for NEMT segment services typically continue until terminated by either party upon reasonable notice in accordance with the terms of the contract, and sometimes a contractual counterparty will seek to renegotiate the pricing and other terms of a contract to our detriment prior to the stated termination date of a contract. We cannot anticipate if, when or to what extent we will be successful in renewing our state Medicaid contracts or retaining our MCO contracts through their contractual duration on terms originally negotiated or at all. For the year ended December 31, 2023, 32.3% of our NEMT segment revenue was generated under state Medicaid contracts that are subject to renewal during 2024.

In addition, with respect to many of our state contracts, the payor may terminate the contract without cause, or for convenience, at will and without penalty to the payor, either immediately or upon the expiration of a short notice period in the event that, among other reasons, government appropriations supporting the programs serviced by the contract are reduced or eliminated. We cannot anticipate if, when or to what extent a payor might terminate a contract with us prior to its expiration, or fail to renew or extend a contract with us. If we are unable to retain or renew our contracts, or replace lost contracts, on satisfactory terms, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. While we pursue new contract awards and also undertake efficiency measures, there can be no assurance that such measures will fully offset the negative impact of contracts that are not renewed or are canceled on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our success depends on our ability to compete effectively in the marketplace, and our results of operations could be materially adversely affected if we are unable to compete effectively in the markets for our services.

We compete for clients and for contracts with a variety of organizations that offer similar services. Many organizations of varying sizes compete with us, including local not-for-profit organizations and community-based organizations, larger companies, organizations that currently provide or may begin to provide similar NEMT services
34


(including transportation network companies such as Uber and Lyft) and CHA providers. Some of these companies may have greater brand recognition as well as greater financial, technical, political, marketing, and other resources that contribute to a larger number of clients or payors than we have. In addition, some of these companies may offer more services than we do. To remain competitive, we must provide superior quality services on a cost-effective basis to our payors and customers.

The market in which we operate is influenced by technological developments that affect cost-efficiency and quality of services, and the needs of our customers change and evolve regularly. Accordingly, our success depends on our ability to develop services that address these changing needs and to provide technology needed to deliver these services on a cost-effective basis. Our competitors may better utilize technology to change the way services in our industry are designed and delivered and they may be able to provide our customers with different or greater capabilities than we can provide, including better contract terms, technical qualifications, price and availability of qualified professional personnel. In addition, new or disruptive technologies and methodologies by our competitors may make our services noncompetitive. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic has driven an industry shift toward virtual health solutions which may reduce the number of in-person visits an end-user may be required to make to healthcare providers in order to receive care, which could reduce the utilization of our NEMT services.

We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, competition from new entrants into the markets in which we operate. Increased competition may result in pricing pressures, loss of or failure to gain market share, or loss of or failure to gain clients or payors, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Our business may also be adversely affected by the consolidation of competitors, which may result in increased pricing pressure or negotiating leverage with payors, or by the provision of our services by payors or clients directly to customers, including through the acquisition of competitors.

We obtain a significant portion of our business through responses to government requests for proposals and we may not be awarded contracts through this process in the future, or contracts we are awarded may not be profitable.

We obtain, and will continue to seek to obtain, a significant portion of our business from state government entities, which generally entails responding to a government request for proposal, or RFP. To propose effectively, we must accurately estimate our cost structure for servicing a proposed contract, the time required to establish operations and submit the most attractive proposal with respect to both technical and price specifications. The accurate estimate of costs is based on historical experience with similar contracts and future expectation around transportation costs, which may be inaccurately forecasted due to uncertainties driven by the post-COVID-19 pandemic supply chain shortages and the current geopolitical environment. We must also assemble and submit a large volume of information within rigid and often short timetables. Our ability to respond successfully to an RFP will greatly affect our business. If we misinterpret bid requirements as to performance criteria or do not accurately estimate performance costs in a binding bid for an RFP, there can be no assurance that we will be able to modify the proposed contract and we may be required to perform under a contract that is not profitable, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations.

If we fail to satisfy our contractual obligations, we could be liable for damages and financial penalties, which may place existing pledged performance and payment bonds at risk as well as harm our ability to keep our existing contracts or obtain new contracts and future bonds, any of which could harm our business and results of operations.

Our failure to comply with our contractual obligations could, in addition to providing grounds for immediate termination of the contract for cause, negatively impact our financial performance and damage our reputation, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to maintain current contracts or obtain new contracts. The termination of a contract for cause could, for instance, subject us to liabilities for excess costs incurred by a payor in obtaining similar services from another source. In addition, our contracts require us to indemnify payors for our failure to meet standards of care, and some of them contain liquidated damages provisions and financial penalties if we breach these contracts, which amounts could be material. Our failure to meet contractual obligations could also result in substantial actual and consequential financial damages, the impact of which could be materially adverse to our business and reputation

If we fail to estimate accurately the cost of performing certain contracts, we may experience reduced or negative margins and our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

During 2023, 2022, and 2021, 85.3%, 87.8%, and 84.7% of our NEMT segment revenue, respectively, was generated under capitated contracts with the remainder generated through fee for service ("FFS") contracts. Under most of our capitated contracts, we assume the responsibility of managing the needs of a specific geographic population by contracting out transportation services to local transportation companies on a per ride or per mile basis. We use “pricing models” to determine applicable contract rates, which take into account factors such as estimated utilization, state specific data, previous experience
35


in the state or with similar services, the medically covered programs outlined in the contract, identified populations to be serviced, estimated volume, estimated transportation provider rates and availability of mass transit. The amount of the fixed per-member, monthly fee is determined in the bidding process, but is predicated on actual historical transportation data for the subject geographic region as provided by the payor, actuarial work performed in-house as well as by third party actuarial firms and actuarial analysis provided by the payor. If the utilization of our services is more than we estimated, the contract may be less profitable than anticipated, or may not be profitable at all.

Certain capitated contracts are structured in a shared risk format and have provisions for reconciliations, risk corridors or profit rebates. Under this shared risk structure, the amount of the fixed per-member fee is determined based on actual realized transportation volumes or costs. This provides some margin protection against unprofitable contracts, as the rate per member will increase if cost of transportation was to increase above certain specified levels. These shared risk contracts pose certain risks to cash management and liquidity, as contracts under this structure can lead to large contract payables and contract receivables balances on our balance sheet, that have longer payment terms than typical cycles. This can lead to large outflows of cash and impact our liquidity.

Under our FFS contracts, we receive fees based on our interactions with government-sponsored clients. To earn a profit on these contracts, we must accurately estimate costs incurred in providing services. If the client population relating to these contracts is not large enough to cover our fixed costs, such as rent and overhead, our operating results could be materially adversely affected and our profitability impaired. Our FFS contracts are not reimbursed on a cost basis; therefore, if we fail to estimate our costs accurately, we may experience reduced margins or losses on these contracts. Revenue under certain contracts may be adjusted prospectively if client volumes are below expectations. If we are unable to adjust our costs accordingly, our profitability may be negatively affected. In addition, certain contracts with state Medicaid agencies are renewable or extended at the state’s option without an adjustment to pricing terms. If such renewed contracts require us to incur higher costs, including inflation or regulatory changes, than originally anticipated, our results of operations and financial position.condition may be adversely affected.

The NEMT segment may be adversely impacted if the drivers we engage as independent contractors were instead classified as employees.

We believe that the drivers we engage to provide rider benefits are properly classified as independent contractors and that these drivers are not our employees. Changes to federal, state or local laws governing the definition or classification of independent contractors, or judicial or administrative challenges to our classification of these drivers as independent contractors, could affect the status of these drivers as independent contractors. A change in the classification of these drivers from independent contractors to employees could increase materially our expenses associated with the delivery of our services, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Significant interruptions in communication and data services could adversely affect our business.

Our usecontact centers are significantly dependent on telephone, internet and data service provided by various communication companies. Any disruption of these services could adversely affect our business. We have taken steps to mitigate our exposure to service disruptions by investing in complex and multi-layered redundancies, and we can transition services among our different contact centers. Despite these efforts, there can be no assurance that the redundancies we have in place would be sufficient to maintain the contact centers' operations without disruption. Any disruption could harm our customer relationships and have a reinsurance programmaterial adverse effect on our results of operations.

Risks Related to Our PCS Segment

Competition among in-home personal care, or home healthcare, services companies is significant, and insuranceif we are not successful in executing on our strategies in the face of this competition, our business could be materially adversely affected.

The in-home personal care services industry, which is sometimes referred to as the home healthcare services industry, is highly competitive. Our PCS segment competes with a variety of other companies in providing personal care services, some of which may have greater financial and other resources and may be more established in their respective communities. Competing companies may offer newer or different services from those offered by us, which may attract customers who are presently receiving our in-home personal care services to those other companies. Competing companies may also offer services across a greater continuum of care and therefore may be able to obtain new cases or retain patients that might otherwise choose us. In the areas in which our in-home personal care programs are provided, we also compete with a large number of organizations, including:

36


community-based home healthcare providers;
hospital-based home healthcare agencies;
rehabilitation centers, including those providing home healthcare services;
adult day care centers;
assisted living centers;
skilled nursing facilities; and
fiscal intermediaries that process payroll and undertake other administrative responsibilities related to cover certain claims for losses sufferedthe provision of care by a patient’s family members or other directly-hired personal assistants.

Some of our current and costspotential competitors have or expenses incurredmay obtain significantly greater marketing and financial resources to promote their programs than we have or may obtain. We compete based on the availability of personnel, the quality of services, the expertise of staff and, in some instances, the price of the services. Relatively few barriers to entry in the personal care industry exist in our local markets. Accordingly, other companies, including hospitals and other healthcare organizations that are not currently providing in-home personal care services, may expand their services to include those services or similar services. We may encounter increased competition in the future that could negatively impact patient referrals to us and limit our ability to maintain or increase our market position, the effect of any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

If any large, national healthcare entities that do not currently directly compete with us move into the in-home personal care market, competition could significantly increase. Larger, national healthcare entities have significant financial resources and extensive technology infrastructure. In addition, companies that currently compete with respect to some of our personal care services could begin competing with additional services through the acquisition of an existing company or de novo expansion into these services. Additionally, consolidation, especially by way of the acquisition of any of our competitors by any large, national healthcare entity, could also lead to increased competition.

State certificates of need, or CON, laws, which often limit the ability of competitors to enter into a given market, are not uniform throughout the United States and are frequently the subject of efforts to limit or repeal such laws. If states remove existing CON laws, we could face increased competition in these states. Further, we cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we are unable to maintain relationships with existing patient referral sources, our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

Our success in entering the markets we serve depends on referrals from physicians, hospitals, nursing homes, service coordination agencies, MCOs, health plans and other sources in the communities we serve and on our ability to maintain good relationships with existing referral sources. Our referral sources are not contractually obligated to refer patients to us and may refer their patients to other providers. Our growth and profitability depends, in part, on our ability to establish and maintain close working relationships with these patient referral sources and to increase awareness and acceptance of the benefits of personal care services by our referral sources and their patients. Our loss of, or failure to maintain, existing relationships or our failure to develop new referral relationships could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We reinsured a substantial portionMany states have CON laws or other regulatory and licensure obligations that may adversely affect the successful integration of our automobile, general liability, professional liabilitypersonal care service lines and workers’ compensation insurance policies through May 15, 2017. Upon renewal of the policies, we made the decision to no longer reinsure these risks, although we continue to resolve claims under the historical policy years. Through February 15, 2011, one of our subsidiaries also insured certain general liability, automobile liability, and automobile physical damage coverage for independent third-party transportation providers. In the event that actual reinsured losses increase unexpectedly and substantially exceed actuarially determined estimated reinsured losses under the program, the aggregate of such losses could materially increase our liability andmay adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity,ability to expand into new markets and thereby limit our ability to grow and increase net patient service revenue.

Many states have enacted CON laws that require prior state approval to open new healthcare facilities or expand services at existing facilities. In such states, expansion by existing providers or entry into the market by new providers is permitted only where a given amount of unmet need exists, resulting either from population increases or a reduction in competing providers. These states ration the entry of new providers or services and the expansion of existing providers or services in their markets through a CON process, which is periodically evaluated and updated as required by applicable state law. The process is intended to promote comprehensive healthcare planning, assist in providing high-quality healthcare at the lowest possible cost and avoid unnecessary duplication by ensuring that only those healthcare facilities and operations that are needed will be built and opened. New York, New Jersey, and West Virginia have CON laws applicable to the in-home personal care services we provide.

In every state where required, our home healthcare offices and personal care centers possess a license and/or CON issued by the state health authority that determines the local service areas for the home healthcare office or personal care center. In general, the process for opening a home healthcare office or personal care center begins by a provider submitting an
37


application for licensure and certification to the state and federal regulatory bodies, which is followed by a testing period of transmitting data from the applicant to the CMS. Once this process is complete, the care center receives a provider agreement and corresponding number and can begin billing for services that it provides unless a CON is required. For those states that require a CON, the provider must also complete a separate application process before billing can commence and receive required approvals for capital expenditures exceeding amounts above prescribed thresholds. Our failure or inability to obtain any necessary approvals could adversely affect our ability to expand into new markets and to expand our PCS segment services and facilities in existing markets.

If a state with CON laws finds that there is an over-abundance of one type of Medicaid provider within the state, it may, for a period of time, impose a moratorium against the issuance of new Medicaid licenses for that type of service. While a moratorium would not prohibit us from continuing to provide services for which we are already licensed in that state, it may prevent us from entering a new state de novo, which could limit our expansion opportunities, affect our ability to execute on our business strategies and materially harm our business and operations.

We may not, absent the consent of the New York Department of Health, be able to manage the day to day operations of the licensed in-home personal care services agency business in the State of New York, which would have an adverse impact on our expected results from that acquisition and could result in a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Our operation of our licensed in-home personal care services agency business in the State of New York is subject to a “no control” affidavit process. We submitted our relevant information associated with this process concurrently with the closing of the Simplura acquisition, but while we wait for necessary approvals, we will be limited in our ability to exercise control over the personal care business there for operational matters until such time that our ownership of that business is approved by the New York Department of Health. We can provide no assurance regarding the timing of the approval of this change of ownership by the New York Department of Health, or that such approval will be obtained at all. During this time, we cannot exercise day to day management of these entities, and the pre-acquisition management of Simplura or individuals hired by the pre-acquisition management of Simplura will continue to operate the business. There is no prohibition on these entities making cash flowsdistributions to us during this interim period, but there can be no assurance that we will obtain the necessary authorization from the New York Department of Health to remove the “no control” affidavit and operate this business ourselves. If we are not able to ultimately take over control of these operations, or if we are only able to do so on a more limited basis than anticipated, we may not achieve the synergies and operational benefits expected from the Simplura acquisition as contemplated and our business and results of operations.operations could be materially adversely affected.


In addition, underChanges in the case-mix of our current insurance policies, we are subject to deductibles, and thus retain exposure within these limits. In the event that actual losses within our deductible limits increase unexpectedly and substantially exceed our expected losses, the aggregate of such losses could materially increase our liability and adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity, cash flows and results of operations.

As the availability to us of certain traditional insurance coverage diminishes or increases in cost, we will continue to evaluate the levels and types of insurance coverage we include in our reinsurance and self-insurance programs,personal care patients, as well as payor mix and payment methodologies, may have a material adverse effect on our profitability.

The sources and amounts of our patient revenues are determined by a number of factors, including the deductible limitsmix of patients and the rates of reimbursement among payors. Changes in the case-mix of the patients as well as payor mix among private pay, Medicare and Medicaid, as well as specialty programs, including waiver programs within Medicaid, may significantly affect our traditional insurance programs. Anyprofitability. In particular, any significant increase to these reinsurance and self-insurance programsin our Medicaid population or increasesdecrease in deductible limits increases our risk exposure and therefore increases the risk ofMedicaid payments could have a possible material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flow, particularly if states operating these programs continue to limit, or more aggressively seek limits on, reimbursement rates or service levels.

Our loss of existing favorable managed care contracts could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, liquidity,results of operations and cash flowsflows.

There is a risk that our existing favorable managed care contracts could be terminated. Managed care contracts typically permit us or the payor to terminate the contract without cause, typically within 90 days, which can provide payors leverage to reduce volume or obtain favorable pricing. Our failure to negotiate and put in place favorable managed care contracts, or our failure to maintain favorable managed care contracts, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The personal care industry has historically experienced shortages in qualified employees and management, which could harm our business.

Our personal care services compete with other healthcare providers for both professional and management level employees. Our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel depends on several factors, including our ability to provide these personnel with attractive assignments for the desired number of hours per week and competitive compensation and benefits. There can be no assurance that we will succeed in any of these areas. As the demand for personal care services continues to exceed the supply of available and qualified personnel, our competitors may be forced to offer more attractive
38


wage and benefit packages to these professionals. Furthermore, the competitive market for this labor force has created turnover as many seek to take advantage of the supply of available positions, each offering new and more attractive wage and benefit packages. In addition to the wage pressures inherent in this environment, including any changes to minimum wage, the cost of training new employees amid the turnover rates may cause added pressure on our operating results and harm our business.

Our personal care business may be adversely impacted by labor relations which could create labor disruptions that impact our ability to perform our obligations.

Approximately 2,700 of our hourly caregivers are unionized in regions of New York. Certain collective bargaining agreements with the 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East are currently being negotiated, and others will require renegotiation upon expiration. We may not be able to negotiate terms that are satisfactory to the labor unions, and ultimate agreement may be on terms unfavorable to us. In addition, a unionized work force poses the risk of work stoppages, which if initiated could materially harm our results of operations as well as our commercial relationships with our customers if we are unable to perform under our contracts with them during any such stoppage.

If additional regions in which we operate become unionized, or if we expand our personal care operations into geographic areas where healthcare workers historically have been unionized, being subject to additional collective bargaining agreements may have a negative impact on our ability to timely and successfully recruit qualified personnel and may increase our operating costs. Generally, if we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel, the quality of our services may decline and we could lose patients and referral sources, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our PCS segment may be subject to malpractice or other similar claims, which could adversely impact our brand and our success in the marketplace.

The services our PCS segment offers involve an inherent risk of professional liability and related substantial damage awards. Due to the nature of our personal care business, we, through our employees and caregivers who provide services on our behalf, may be the subject of medical malpractice claims. A court could find that these individuals should be considered our agents, and, as a result, we could be held liable for their acts or omissions. Claims of this nature, regardless of their ultimate outcome, could have a material adverse effect on our business or reputation or on our ability to attract and retain patients and employees. While we maintain malpractice liability coverage that we believe is appropriate given the nature and breadth of our operations, any claims against us in excess of insurance limits, or multiple claims requiring us to pay deductibles, could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Risks Related to Our RPM Segment

We operate in a competitive industry, and any failure to develop and enhance technology applications could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Inaccurate, misleadingStrategic shifts in the industry as a result of the pandemic toward in-home care solutions have accelerated the growth in the RPM industry which is a competitive industry and we expect it to attract increased competition, which could make it difficult for us to succeed. We currently face competition in the RPM industry from a range of companies, including specialized software and solution providers that offer similar solutions, often at substantially lower prices, and that are continuing to develop additional products and becoming more sophisticated and effective. In addition, large, well-financed health plans have in some cases developed their own telehealth, expert medical service or negative media coveragechronic condition management tools and may provide these solutions to their customers at discounted prices. Competition from specialized software and solution providers, health plans and other parties will result in continued pricing pressures, which is likely to lead to price declines in certain product segments, which could damagenegatively impact our reputationsales, profitability and harmmarket share.

Some of our competitors may have, or new competitors or alliances may emerge that have, greater name recognition, a larger customer base, longer operating histories, more widely-adopted proprietary technologies, greater marketing expertise, larger sales forces and significantly greater resources than we do. Further, our current or potential competitors may be acquired by third parties with greater available resources. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly and effectively than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or customer requirements and may have the ability to initiate or withstand substantial price competition. In addition, current and potential competitors have established, and may in the future establish, cooperative relationships with vendors of complementary products, technologies or services to increase the availability of their solutions in the marketplace. Our competitors could also be better positioned to serve certain segments of our markets, which could create additional price pressure. In light of these factors, even if our solutions are more
39


effective than those of our competitors, current or potential customers may accept competitive solutions in lieu of purchasing our solutions. If we are unable to successfully compete, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

If we do not continue to innovate and provide services that are useful to customers and achieve and maintain market acceptance, we may not remain competitive, and our revenue and results of operations could suffer.

Our success depends on our ability to keep pace with technological developments, satisfy increasingly sophisticated customer requirements, and achieve and maintain or procure contracts.
There is sometimes media coverage regardingmarket acceptance on our existing and future services in the rapidly evolving market for the management and administration of healthcare services. In addition, market acceptance and adoption of our existing and future services depends on the acceptance by health plans and provider partners as to the distinct features, cost savings and other perceived benefits of our existing and future offerings as compared to competitive alternative services. Our competitors are constantly developing products and services that may become more efficient or appealing to our customers. As a result, we must continue to invest significant resources in research and development in order to enhance our existing services and introduce new services that our customers will want, while offering our existing and future services at competitive prices. If we are unable to predict customer preferences or industry changes, or if we are unable to modify our competitors provideexisting and future services on a timely or contractscost-effective basis, we may lose customers and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be harmed.

If we are not successful in demonstrating to existing and potential customers the benefits of our existing and future services, or if we are not able to achieve the support of health plans and provider partners for our existing and future services, our revenue may decline or we may fail to increase our revenue in line with our forecasts. Our results of operations would also suffer if our technology and other innovations are not responsive to the needs of our customers, are not timed to match the corresponding market opportunity, or are not effectively brought to market.

Risks Related to Our Corporate and Other Segment

Our investment in Matrix could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on our equity investment’s financial condition, any disputes that may arise between us and Matrix and our exposure to potential losses from the actions of Matrix, and could materially and adversely affect the value of our consolidated assets.

We hold a non-controlling interest in Matrix, which, as of December 31, 2023, constituted 2.4% of our consolidated assets. We do not have unilateral power to direct the activities that most significantly impact Matrix’s economic performance. The arrangement with Matrix involves risks not present with respect to our wholly-owned subsidiaries and that may negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations or make the arrangement less successful than anticipated. Factors that may negatively impact the success of our Matrix investment include the following:

we may be unable to take actions that we believe are appropriate but are opposed by Matrix under arrangements that require us to cede or share decision-making authority over major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the company and any property owned by the company, such as the sale or financing of the business or the making of additional capital contributions for the benefit of the business;
Matrix management may take actions that we oppose;
we may be unable to sell or transfer our competitorsinvestment to a third party if we fail to obtain the prior consent of our investment partner;
Matrix may become bankrupt or the majority member may fail to fund its share of required capital contributions, which could adversely impact the investment or increase our financial commitment to the investment;
Matrix may have business interests or goals with respect to a business that conflict with our business interests and goals, including with respect to the timing, terms and strategies for investment, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the business;
disagreements with Matrix could result in litigation or arbitration that increases our expenses, distracts our management, and disrupts the day-to-day operations of the business, including the delay of important decisions until the dispute is resolved; and
we may suffer losses as a result of actions taken by Matrix with respect to our investment.

If any of the foregoing events were to transpire, our results of operations and liquidity position could be materially adversely affected and our business could be materially harmed.

40


As part of our investment in innovation, the MSO provides virtual clinical care management services through the PC, an unaffiliated professional corporation owned and operated by a licensed physician, and our relationships or arrangements with the PC could become subject to legal challenges.

The MSO’s contractual relationships and arrangements with the PC, through which virtual healthcare services are provided, may implicate certain state laws that generally prohibit non-professional entities from providing licensed medical services or exercising control over licensed physicians or other healthcare professionals (such activities are generally referred to as the “corporate practice of medicine”) or engaging in certain practices such as fee-splitting with such licensed professionals. The interpretation and enforcement of these laws vary significantly from state to state. There can be no assurance that these laws will be interpreted in a party to. Inaccurate, misleadingmanner consistent with our practices or negative mediathat other laws or regulations will not be enacted in the future that could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Regulatory authorities, state boards of medicine, state attorneys general and other parties may assert that, despite the agreements through which we operate, we are engaged in the provision of medical services and/or that our arrangements with the PC constitute unlawful fee-splitting. If a jurisdiction’s prohibition on the corporate practice of medicine or fee-splitting is interpreted in a manner that is inconsistent with our practices, we would be required to restructure or terminate our arrangements with the PC to bring our activities into compliance with such laws. A determination of non-compliance, or the termination of or failure to successfully restructure these relationships could result in disciplinary action, penalties, damages, fines, and/or a loss of revenue, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Some state corporate practice of medicine and fee-splitting prohibitions also authorize penalties on healthcare professionals for aiding in the improper rendering of professional services, which could discourage physicians and other healthcare professionals with whom we contract from providing clinical services.

The MSO, the PC and the medical practitioners providing virtual clinical care services through such PC may become subject to medical liability claims, which could have an adverse impact on our business.

The relationships and arrangements between the MSO, the PC and the medical practitioners providing virtual clinical care services through such PC entail the risk of medical liability claims against the MSO. Although we carry insurance covering medical malpractice claims in amounts that we believe are appropriate in light of the risks attendant to our business, successful medical liability claims could result in substantial damage awards that exceed the limits of our insurance coverage, about us could harm our reputation and, accordingly, our ability to maintain our existing contracts and/or procure new contracts.plaintiffs in these matters may request punitive or other damages that may not be covered by insurance. In addition, negative media coveragesuch liability insurance is expensive and insurance premiums may increase significantly in the future, particularly as we expand the services offered by the MSO. As a result, adequate liability insurance may not be available to the MSO in the future at acceptable costs or at all. Any claims made against the MSO that are not fully covered by insurance could influence government officialsbe costly to slowdefend, result in substantial damage awards against the paceMSO and divert the attention of privatizingour or retendering government services.the MSO’s management, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


If the MSO or the PC fail to comply with applicable data interoperability and information blocking rules, our consolidated results of operations could be adversely affected.


Regulatory RisksThe 21st Century Cures Act (the “Cures Act”), which was signed into law in December 2016, includes provisions related to data interoperability, information blocking and patient access. In May 2020, CMS and the HHS Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (“ONC”) published the Cures Act final rule, which went into effect on April 5, 2021, to clarify provisions of the Cures Act regarding interoperability and information blocking, and to include, among other things, requirements surrounding information blocking, changes to ONC’s health IT certification program and requirements that CMS-regulated payors make relevant claims/care data and provider directory information available through standardized patient access and provider directory application programming interfaces, or APIs, that connect to provider electronic health record systems (“EHRs”). The final rule will transform the way in which healthcare providers, health IT developers, health information exchanges/health information networks, (“HIEs/HINs”), and health plans share patient information, and create significant requirements for healthcare industry participants. For example, the final rule prohibits healthcare providers, health IT developers of certified health IT, and HIEs/HINs from engaging in practices that are likely to interfere with, prevent, materially discourage, or otherwise inhibit the access, exchange or use of electronic health information (“EHI”), also known as “information blocking.” To further support access and exchange of EHI, the final rule identifies eight “reasonable and necessary activities” as exceptions to information blocking activities, as long as specific conditions are met. As a relatively new rule, the interpretation of these requirements is continuing to evolve and any failure of the MSO or the PC to comply with these rules could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our U.S.
41


The MSO and the PC remote patient monitoring business model depends on the ability for new patient encounters to occur remotely by means of telehealth, and if the telehealth flexibilities currently permitted under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 are not extended, this business model may no longer be feasible and our results of operations could be adversely affected.

Under the CMS’ 2021 Physician Fee Schedule final rule, CMS limited the provision of RPM services to “established patients” of a billing physician, which required an initiating in-person visit with the physician. In the CMS’ 2024 Physician Fee Schedule final rule, CMS confirmed that the “established patient” limitation continues to be in place for RPM services.In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, CMS made several changes in the manner in which Medicare will pay for telehealth visits, many of which relax previous requirements, including the “established patient” restriction, initiating site requirements for both the providers and patients and telehealth modality requirements. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 extended many of the COVID-19 public health emergency provisions related to telehealth until December 31, 2024, including the flexibility to permit a patient’s home to be an originating cite and to permit telehealth by means of audio only communication. State law applicable to telehealth, particularly licensure requirements, has also been relaxed in many jurisdictions as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unclear which, if any, of these changes will remain in place permanently and which will be rolled-back following the COVID-19 pandemic. If regulations change to restrict the ability of physicians to deliver care through telehealth modalities, including with respect to the initiating visit, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

Risks Related to Governmental Regulations

Healthcare Segments conduct business inis a heavily regulated healthcare industry. Complianceindustry, and compliance with existing Lawslaws is costly, and changes in Laws ornon-compliance has the potential to be even costlier considering that violations of Lawslaws may result in increased costscorrective action or sanctions that could reduce our segments’ revenue and profitability.

The U.S.United States healthcare industry is subject to extensive federal and state Lawsoversight relating to, among other things:


professional licensure;
conduct of operations;
addition of facilities, equipment and services, including certificates of need;need, or CON;
coding and billing related to our services; and
payment for services.

Both federal and state government agencies have increased coordinated civil and criminal enforcement efforts related to the healthcare industry. Regulations related to the healthcare industry are extremely complex and, in many instances, the industry does not have the benefit of significant regulatory or judicial interpretation of those laws. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as well as the anticipated attempts to repeal all or portions of those laws by the President and Congress, has also introduced some degree of regulatory uncertainty as the industry does not know how the changes it introduced or changes to it will affect many aspects of the industry.

Medicare and Medicaid anti-fraud and abuse laws prohibit certain business practices and relationships related to items and services reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid and other governmental healthcare programs, including the payment or receipt of remuneration to induce or arrange for referral of patients or recommendation for the provision of items or services covered by Medicare or Medicaid or any other federal or state healthcare program.program, often referred to as the Anti-Kickback Statute. Federal and state Lawslaws also prohibit the submission of false or fraudulent claims, including claims to obtain reimbursement under Medicare and Medicaid. Our U.S. Healthcare SegmentsMedicaid, under what is commonly referred to as the False Claims Act. We have implemented compliance policies to help assure theirour compliance with these regulations as they become effective; however,effective, but interpretations different from our interpretations or enforcement of these laws and regulations in the future could subject our practices to allegations of impropriety, or illegality, or could require such segments to make changes in their facilities, equipment, personnel, services or the manner in which they conduct our business.
Changes in budgetary priorities of the government entities that fund the services our segments provide could result in our segments’ loss of contracts or a decrease in amounts payable to them under their contracts.
Our segments’ revenue is largely derived from contracts that are directly or indirectly paid or funded by government agencies. All of these contracts are subject to legislative appropriations and state or national budget approval. The availability of funding under NET Services’ contracts with state governments is dependent in part upon federal funding to states. Changes in Medicaid methodology may further reduce the availability of federal funds to states in which our U.S. Healthcare Segments provide services. The President of the United States and Congress have proposed various changes to the Medicaid program, including considering converting the Medicaid program to a block grant format or capping the federal contribution to state Medicaid programs to a fixed amount per beneficiary. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) has the ability to grant waivers to states relative to the parameters of their Medicaid programs. Such changes, individually or in the aggregate could have a material adverse effect on our U.S. Healthcare Segments operations.
Among the alternative Medicaid funding approaches that states have explored are provider assessments as tools for leveraging increased Medicaid federal matching funds. Provider assessment plans generate additional federal matching funds to the states for Medicaid reimbursement purposes, and implementation of a provider assessment plan requires approval by CMS in order to qualify for federal matching funds. These plans usually take the form of a bed tax or a quality assessment fee, which were historically required to be imposed uniformly across classes of providers within the state, except that such taxes only applied to Medicaid health plans.
Changes to provider assessment opportunities, the Medicaid programs in states in which our U.S. Healthcare Segments operate or in the structure of the federal government’s support for those programs can impact the amount of funds available in the programs our U.S. Healthcare Segments support. Such segments cannot make any assurances that these Medicaid changes will not negatively affect the funding under their contracts. As funding under U.S. Healthcare Segments’ contracts is dependent in part upon federal funding, such funding changes could have a significant effect upon such segments’ businesses.
Currently, many of the U.S. states and overseas countries in which our segments operate are facing budgetary shortfalls or changes in budgetary priorities. While many of these states are dealing with budgetary concerns by shifting costs from institutional care to home and community based care such as we provide, there is no assurance that this trend will continue.


Likewise, in many of the overseas countries addressed by WD Services, particularly the UK, a continued focus following the global financial crisis on austerity measures to reduce national and local budget deficits could lead to further spending cuts or changes to welfare arrangements. This may make availability of funding for outsourcing of such services more difficult to obtain from relevant government departments, which may lead to more challenging terms and conditions, including pressure on prices or volumes of services provided.
In the UK, the low unemployment rate has led to a change in the government prioritizing employability services, and a consequent reduction in scale of the Work and Health Programme, the successor program to the Work Programme. While we have the ability to alter a portion of our cost structure to reflect the decreasing volume of these contracts during their term, there may be significant redundancy costs and management time additionally invested to reflect these changes, particularly if programs are discontinued.
Consequently, a significant decline in government expenditures, shift of expenditures or funding away from programs that call for the types of services that we provide, or change in government contracting or funding policies could cause payers to terminate their contracts with our segments or reduce their expenditures under those contracts, either of which could have a negative impact on our segments’ operating results. 
Our segments are subject to regulations relating to privacy and security of patient and service user information. Failure to comply with privacy and security regulations could result in a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results.
There are numerous federal and state regulations addressing patient information privacy and security concerns. In particular, the federal regulations issued under HIPAA contain provisions that:

protect individual privacy by limiting the uses and disclosures of patient information;
require the implementation of security safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of individually identifiable health information in electronic form; and
prescribe specific transaction formats and data code sets for certain electronic healthcare transactions.
Compliance with state and federal laws and regulations is costly and requires our segment management to expend substantial time and resources which could negatively impact our segments’ results of operations. Further, the HIPAA regulations and state privacy laws expose our segments to increased regulatory risk, as the penalties associated with a failure to comply or with information security breaches, even if unintentional, could have a material adverse effect on our segments’ results of operations.
Our WD Services segment has operations in many countries in Europe, and internationally, and these operations have access to significant amounts of sensitive personal information about individuals. In Europe, these operations are subject to European and national data privacy legislation which imposes significant obligations on data processors and controllers with respect to such personal information. Similar regimes exist in other WD Service jurisdictions such as Australia, Canada and South Korea. Some countries, such as Spain, France and Germany, have particularly strong privacy laws which impose even greater obligations on people handling personal information. Data protection and privacy law within the EU is changing effective May 25, 2018, from which date the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) must be complied with. Amongst other changes the GDPR brings about an increase in the potential fines for certain breaches of the GDPR, of up to the higher of 4% of an undertaking’s global turnover or €20,000,000. In addition to fining powers, data protection authorities in Europe have significant powers to require organizations that breach regulations to put in place measures to ensure that such breaches do not occur again, and require businesses to stop processing personal information until the required measures are in place. Such orders could significantly impact our business given that we are required to handle personal information as part of our service delivery model. The GDPR and other similar laws and regulations, as well as any associated inquiries or investigations or any other government actions, may be costly to comply with, result in negative publicity, increase our operating costs, require significant management time and attention, and subject us to remedies that may harm our business, including fines or demands or orders that we modify or cease existing business practices.

Our segments could be subject to actions for false claims or recoupment of funds pursuant to certain audits if they do not comply with government coding and billing rules, which could have a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results.
If our segments fail to comply with federal and state documentation, coding and billing rules, our segments could be subject to criminal or civil penalties, loss of licenses and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which could have a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results. In billing for our segments’ services to third-party payers, our segments must follow complex documentation, coding and billing rules. These rules are based on federal and state laws, rules and regulations, various government pronouncements, and industry practice. In the U.S., failure to follow these rules could result in


potential criminal or civil liability under the federal False Claims Act, under which extensive financial penalties can be imposed or under various state statutes which prohibit the submission of false claims for services covered. Compliance failure could further result in criminal liability under various federal and state criminal or civil statutes. Our segments may be subject to audits conducted by our clients or their proxies that may result in recoupment of funds. In addition, our segments’ clients may be subject to certain audits that may result in recoupment of funds from our clients that may, in turn, implicate our segments’ services. Our segments’ businesses could be adversely affected in the event such an audit results in negative findings and recoupment from or penalties to their customers.
Our segment contracts are subject to stringent claims and invoice processing regimes which vary depending on the customer and nature of the payment mechanism. Government entities in the U.S. may take the position that if a transport cannot be matched to a healthcare event, or is conducted inconsistently with contractual, regulatory or even policy requirements, payment for such transport may be recouped by such customer. Under European procurement legislation which has been implemented in each EU member state, any conviction for fraud can result in a ban from participating in public procurement tenders for up to five years, or until the organization in question has put in place “self clean” measures to the satisfaction of the procuring authority. This could significantly affect our business given that most of our customers in Europe are governmental organizations. Any such breaches or deficiencies in paperwork associated with billing may also be subject to contractual clawback regimes and penalties, which can be enforced many years after the revenue has been paid by the relevant authority.
While our segments carefully and regularly review their documentation, coding and billing practices, the rules are frequently vague and confusing and they cannot assure that governmental investigators, private insurers or private whistleblowers will not challenge their practices. Such a challenge could result in a material adverse effect on our segments’ financial position and results of operations.

Our segments’ business could be subject to civil penalties and loss of business if we fail to comply with applicable bribery, corruption and other regulations governing business with governments.
Our U.S. Healthcare Segments are subject to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits the offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for referring, ordering, leasing, purchasing or arranging for or recommending the ordering, purchasing or leasing of items or services payable by a federally funded healthcare program. Any of our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ financial relationships with healthcare providers will be potentially implicated by this statute to the extent Medicare or Medicaid referrals are implicated. Violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute could result in substantial civil or criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $25,000 per violation, imprisonment of up to five years, civil penalties under the Civil Monetary Penalties Law of up to $50,000 per violation, plus three times the remuneration involved, civil penalties under the False Claims Act of up to $11,000 for each claim submitted, plus three times the amounts paid for such claims and exclusion from participation in the Medicaid and Medicare programs. Any such penalties could have a significant negative effect on our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ operations. Furthermore, the exclusion, if applied to such segments, could result in significant reductions in our revenues, which could materially and adversely affect such segments’ businesses, financial condition and results of their operations. In addition, many states have adopted laws similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute with similar penalties.

As an international business whose customers are largely in the public sector, the WD Services segment generally wins work through public tender processes. Various statutes, such as the UK’s Bribery Act and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the U.S., generally require organizations to prohibit bribery by or for the organization and demand the implementation of systems to counter bribery, including risk management, training and guidance and the maintenance of adequate record-keeping and internal accounting practices. These statutes also, among other things, prohibit us from providing anything of value to foreign officials for the purposes of influencing official decisions or obtaining or retaining business or otherwise obtaining favorable treatment. In addition, many countries in which we operate have antitrust or competition regulations which, among other things, prohibit collusive tendering or bid-rigging behavior. Policies and procedures we implement to prevent bribery, corruption and anti-competitive conduct may not effectively prevent us from violating these regulations in every transaction in which we may engage, and such a violation could adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations. Any breach of bribery, corruption and collusive tendering laws could also expose our operations in Europe to a ban from participating in public procurement tenders for up to 5 years, or until the organization in question has put in place “self clean” measures to the satisfaction of the procuring authority.

In WD Services, we conduct business in several countries, each with its own system of regulation. Compliance with existing regulations is costly, and changes in regulations or violations of regulations may result in increased costs or sanctions that could reduce our revenue and profitability.
As of December 31, 2017, our WD Services segment operated in the U.S and 10 countries outside the U.S. Each of these countries has its own national and municipal laws and regulations, and some countries such as Australia, Germany and Switzerland,


have both federal and state regulations. In the UK, certain law making powers are being devolved to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. These laws can differ significantly from country to country. In addition, in Europe, countries (including the UK) are subject to European Union (“EU”) laws and rules. We have implemented compliance policies to help assure our compliance with these laws and regulations as they become effective; however, different interpretations or enforcement of these laws and regulations in the future could subject our practices to allegations of impropriety or illegalityoverpayment, or could require us to make changes in our facilities, equipment, personnel, services or the manner in which we conduct our business.
Our segments’ businesses could be adversely affected by future legislative changes that hinder or reverse the privatizationbusiness, any of non-emergency transportation services or workforce development services.
The market for certain of our segments’ services depends largely on government sponsored programs. These programs can be modified or amended at any time. Moreover, part of our growth strategy includes aggressively pursuing opportunities created by government initiatives to privatize the delivery of non-emergency transportation services and workforce development services. However, there are opponents to the privatization of these services and, as a result, future privatization is uncertain. In the UK, opposition to the government’s outsourcing of the services provided by WD Services to private companies may increase in light of recent events in the UK, including the liquidation of the UK government contractor Carillion plc. In 2017, legislation was proposed in the U.S. Congress, but not passed, which would reduce or eliminate certain non-emergency medical transportation services provided by NET Services as a required Medicaid benefit. If additional privatization initiatives are not proposed or enacted, or if previously enacted privatization initiatives are challenged, repealed or invalidated, there could be a material adverse impact on our segments’ operating results.

Our business could be adversely affected by the referendum on the UK’s exit from the European Union.
On June 23, 2016, the UK held a referendum in which eligible persons voted in favor of a proposal that the UK leave the EU, also known as “Brexit”. The result of the referendum increases political and economic uncertainty in the UK for the foreseeable future, in particular during any period where the terms of any UK exit from the EU are negotiated. In turn, Brexit could cause disruptions to and create uncertainty surrounding our business, including affecting our relationships with our existing and future payers and employees, which could have an adverse effect on our financial results, operations and prospects, including being adversely affected in ways that cannot be anticipated at present. The impact of Brexit on our business is not yet clear, and will depend on any agreements the UK makes to retain access to EU markets. Such agreements could potentially disrupt and/or destabilize the markets we serve and the tax jurisdictions in which we operate and adversely change tax benefits or liabilities in these or other jurisdictions. The terms of any UK exit from the EU could generate restriction on the movement of capital and the mobility of personnel. Depending on the outcome of negotiations between the UK and the European Union regarding the terms of Brexit (which will be negotiated over a period which may extend at least until March 2019), we may decide to alter the group’s European operations to respond to new business, legal, regulatory, tax and trade environments that may result. In addition, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the UK determines which EU laws to replace, modify or replicate.
Following the referendum, there was significant volatility in global stock markets and currency exchange rate fluctuations that resulted in the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies in which we conduct business. The strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the British pound and other currencies may adversely affect our results of operations as we translate sales and other results denominated in foreign currency into U.S. dollars for our financial statements. During periods of a strengthening dollar, our reported international sales and earnings could be reduced because foreign currencies may translate into fewer U.S. dollars. For the year ended December 31, 2017, revenue denominated in British pound represented 11.6% of our revenue.
Brexit may also create global economic uncertainty, which may cause our payers to closely monitor theirincrease costs and reduce their spending budget on our services. Additionally, changes in governmental personnel may impact our current relationships with our payers. Any of these effects and the uncertainties of Brexit, among others, could materially adversely affect our business business opportunities,and results of operations, financial condition, future growth and cash flows.operations.

Changes to the regulatory landscape applicable to Matrixour businesses could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.condition, including the proposed ruling by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") titled Ensuring Access to Medicaid Services

Our PCS segment locations that maintain a Medicare certified home healthcare line of business (for example, in Pennsylvania and Massachusetts) must comply with ever changing federal conditions or participation, where compliance is difficult to achieve and hard to monitor. Recently implemented requirements for which adherence is particularly challenging include the need to:

provide transfer summary to facility within two days of a planned transfer or within two business days of becoming aware of an unplanned transfer if the patient is still receiving care in the facility;
42


provide written notice of patient’s rights and responsibilities, and transfer and discharge policies to a patient‑selected representative within four business days of the initial evaluation visit;
communicate revisions to the plan of care due to change in health status to the patient, representative (if any), caregiver and physicians issuing orders for plan of care; and
communicate discharge plan revisions to the patient, representative (if any), caregiver, all physicians issuing orders for the plan of care and to the provider expected to care for the patient after discharge (if any).

CMS could adopt new requirements or guidelines that may further increase the costs associated with the provision of certified services, which could harm our business and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. As an example, components of the 2023 proposed ruling released by CMS titled Ensuring Access to Medicaid Services, which proposes advancements in access to care, quality of care, and improved health outcomes for Medicaid beneficiaries, include stipulations which would require that 80.0% of Medicaid payments for personal care services be spent on compensation for the direct care workforce rather than other administrative or overhead expenses. This requirement would limit our ability to achieve a gross margin that would allow us to continue to invest in technological platforms that would ease the administrative burden and allow our care providers to focus on higher quality of care, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

In New York, we provide Service Coordination, or SC, and/or Home and Community Support Services, or HCSS, to Traumatic Brain Injury, or TBI, and Nursing Home Transition and Diversion, or NHTD, Medicaid waiver participants. These waiver programs were developed based on the philosophy that individuals with disabilities, individuals with traumatic brain injury, and seniors, may be successfully served and included in their surrounding communities so long as the individual is the primary decision maker and works in cooperation with care providers to develop a plan of services that promotes personal independence, greater community inclusion, self-reliance and participation in meaningful activities and services. Examples of activities that are at various stages of implementation that may implicate or materially adversely affect our waiver line of business profitability follow.

Conflict Free Case ManagementThe CHANYS DOH, in collaboration with CMS, is implementing mandatory conflict-free case management policies. Conflict-free case management requires the separation of clinical eligibility determinations and care planning assessments (for example, SC) from the direct provision of services (for example, HCSS). Providers in the personal care industry are expected to implement additional conflict of interest standards that may or may not ultimately require the creation of legally separate entities with distinct protocols.

Managed Long-Term Care Carve-In – Managed Long-Term Care, or MLTC, is a system believed to streamline the delivery of long-term care services to people who are chronically ill or disabled and who wish to reside, or continue to reside, safely in their homes and communities. The entire array of services to which an enrolled member is entitled can be received through the MLTC plan a particular member has chosen. As New York transforms its long-term care system to one that ensures care management for all, enrollment in a MLTC plan may be mandatory or voluntary, depending on individual circumstances. While TBI and NHTD participants are currently excluded from having to enroll in a MLTC plan (for example, SC and HCSS claims are billed and paid on a Medicaid fee-for-service basis), the NYS DOH submitted a transition plan to CMS for consideration that eliminates the exclusion, meaning that TBI and NHTD waiver participants who wish to continue receiving services must enroll in a plan. While the primary goal stated was to improve access to all services across the state, the result may also require our navigation of network participation requirements and typical managed care cost control measures (for example, authorizations, utilization review, rate negotiation).

Regarding in-home personal care generally (including certified or non-certified and waiver or non-waiver), compliance with responsibilities under the Fair Labor Standards Act, or FLSA, remains key. The United States Department of Labor, or DOL, continues its focus on the industry to ensure that personal care workers earn a minimum wage and are afforded various overtime pay protections. We may be sued individually or by a class of workers claiming that a violation has occurred, or a complaint may be filed with the DOL to investigate. If it is ultimately found that we neglected to pay the full amount of wages owed under the FLSA (for meals, breaks, travel, or otherwise), payment for the missing amount and possibly double that amount may be mandated, which could materially increase our costs and harm our results of operations.

With respect to our Matrix investment, the Comprehensive Health Assessment ("CHA") services industry is primarily regulated by federal and state healthcare Lawslaws and the requirements of participation and reimbursement of the MA ProgramMedicare Advantage program established by CMS. From time to time, CMS considers changes to regulatory guidelines with respect to prospective CHAs or the risk adjusted payment system applicable to Matrix’s Medicare Advantage plan customers. CMS could adopt new requirements or guidelines that may, for example, increase the costs associated with CHAs, limit the opportunities and settings available to administer CHAs, or otherwise change the risk adjusted payment system in a way that would adversely

43



adversely impact our business. Further, changes in or adoption of new state laws governing the scope of practice of mid-level practitioners, or more restrictive interpretations of such laws, may restrict Matrix’s ability to provide services using nurse practitioners. Any such implementation of additional regulations on the CHA industry by CMS or other regulatory bodies or further regulation of mid-level practitioners could have a material adverse impact on Matrix’s revenues and margins, which could have a material adverse impact on our consolidatedbalance sheet and financial position.

State revalidation and potential reduction of eligible Medicaid beneficiaries as a result of the restart of the Medicaid eligibility redetermination process following the expiration of the COVID-19 public health emergency under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (2020) could diminish the demand for our services, affect the profitability of our capitated contracts with our customers, and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.operations and financial condition.


If our U.S. Healthcare Segments failThe Families First Coronavirus Response Act (2020) requires states to comply with physician self-referral laws,maintain Medicaid beneficiary eligibility for all Medicaid participants through the last day of the month in which the COVID-19 PHE ends. On May 11, 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") declared the end of the PHE for the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to the extent applicableenactment of the Act, states regularly reviewed on an on-going basis whether Medicaid participants qualified for the program, based on factors such as income, age or disability status. While states were prohibited from removing ineligible participants from their Medicaid rolls during the PHE, new enrollment steadily increased, resulting in record high levels of Medicaid participation. Now that HHS has declared the end of the PHE, states must revalidate the eligibility of each Medicaid beneficiary once every 12 months. During this process, a significant number of Medicaid beneficiaries could lose Medicaid coverage, not only because of changed circumstances such as regained employment, but also as a result of clerical and other errors that may leave otherwise eligible beneficiaries off the rolls due to the administrative burden to be placed on short-staffed state and local offices. A drop in Medicaid enrollment could affect adversely our ability to be reimbursed by our customers for the services we provide to our end-users, our NEMT per-member per-month fee generation under our capitated contracts, and our FFS payments and the demand for our services generally, the occurrence of any of which could harm our business and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations theyand financial condition.

The cost of our services is funded substantially by government and private insurance programs, and changes in budgetary priorities of the government entities or private insurance programs that fund these services could experience a significantresult in the loss of contracts, a reduction in reimbursement revenue.rates, or a decrease in amounts payable to us under our contracts.

Our U.S. Healthcare Segments may bePayments for our services are largely derived from contracts that are directly or indirectly paid by government agencies with public funds and private insurance companies. All of these contracts are subject to federallegislative appropriations and state statutesand/or national budget approval, as well as changes to potential eligibility for services. The availability of funding under our contracts with state governments is dependent in part upon federal funding to states. Changes in Medicaid provider reimbursement and regulations banning paymentsfederal matching funds methodologies may further reduce the availability of federal funds to states in which we provide services.

Currently, many of the states in which we operate are facing budgetary shortfalls or changes in budgetary priorities. While many of these states are dealing with budgetary concerns by shifting costs from institutional care to home and community-based care such as the services we provide, there is no assurance that this trend will continue or be implemented as it has been historically. For example, in New York (one of several states where our PCS segment provides services under the name “All Metro Health Care”), there are Medicaid Redesign Team initiatives taking place aimed at reducing Medicaid expense through provider consolidation and other measures. Our continued ability to provide core services, though expected, is now dependent upon various competitive bid processes, including the following:

LHCSA Request for referrals of patients and referrals by physicians to healthcare providers with whom the physicians haveProposal (Anticipated) – The FY 2021 enacted New York State Budget created a financial relationship and billingnew Public Health Law, or PHL, Section 3605-c which, if implemented, would prohibit Licensed Home Care Service Agencies, or LHCSAs, such as our PCS segment’s individually-licensed branches, from providing or claiming for services provided pursuant to Medicaid recipients without being authorized to do so by contract with the NYS DOH. This restriction would apply to the provision of such referrals if any occur. Violationservices under the state Medicaid plan, a plan waiver, or through an MCO (for example, managed long-term care plan). If implemented, the statute would require the NYS DOH to contract with only enough LHCSAs to ensure that Medicaid recipients have access to care. The NYS DOH is expected to post an RFP that includes demonstrated cultural and language competencies specific to the population of theserecipients and the available workforce, experience serving individuals with disabilities, and demonstrated compliance with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations among the selection criteria. After contracts are awarded, the NYS DOH could terminate a LHCSA’s contract, or suspend or limit a LHCSA’s rights and privileges under a contract, upon thirty-days' written notice if the Commissioner of Health finds that a LHCSA has failed to comply with the extent applicableprovisions of Section 3605-c or any regulations promulgated under the statute. Also, authorization received by LHCSAs under PHL Section
44


3605-c would not substitute for satisfying existing licensure requirements or the screening and enrollment process required for participation in the Medicaid program.

Consequently, a significant decline in government or private insurance company expenditures or the number of program beneficiaries, a shift of expenditures or funding away from programs that call for the types of services that we provide, or change in government contracting or funding policies could cause payors to terminate their contracts with us or reduce their expenditures or reimbursement rates under those contracts, either of which could have a negative impact on our U.S. Healthcare Segments’ operations, may result in prohibitionfinancial position and operating results.

We are subject to regulations relating to privacy and security of payment for services rendered, loss of licenses, fines, criminal penaltiespatient and exclusion from Medicaidservice user information, and Medicare programs. To the extent such segments do maintain such financial relationships with physicians, they rely on certain exceptions to self-referral laws that they believe will be applicable to such arrangements. Anyour failure to comply with such exceptionsregulations could result in a material adverse impact on our operating results.

There are numerous federal and state regulations addressing patient information privacy and security concerns. In particular, the federal regulations issued under HIPAA contain provisions that:

protect individual privacy by limiting the uses and disclosures of patient information;
require the implementation of security safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of individually identifiable health information in electronic form; and
prescribe specific transaction formats and data code sets for certain electronic healthcare transactions.

Compliance with state and federal privacy laws and regulations requires considerable resources. These costs and investments could negatively impact our financial position and results of operations. Further, the HIPAA regulations and state privacy laws expose us to increased regulatory risk, as the penalties discussed above.associated with a failure to comply or with information security breaches, even if unintentional, could be substantial and have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

AsWe could be subject to actions for false claims or recoupment of funds pursuant to certain audits for non-compliance with government coding and billing rules, which could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.

If we fail to comply with federal and state documentation, coding and billing rules, we could be subject to criminal or civil penalties, loss of licenses and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and operating results. In billing for our services to third-party clients, we must follow complex documentation, coding and billing rules. These rules are based on federal and state laws, rules and regulations, various government pronouncements, including guidance and notices, and industry practice. Failure to follow these rules could result in potential criminal or civil liability under the federal False Claims Act, under which extensive financial penalties can be imposed, or under various state statutes which prohibit the submission of false claims for services covered. Compliance failure could further result in criminal liability under various federal and state criminal or civil statutes. We may be subject to audits conducted by our clients or their proxies, including the Office of Inspector General, or OIG, for the Department of Health and Human Services, or DHHS, state Medicaid regulatory agencies, state Medicaid fraud enforcement agencies, health departments, CMS, the Unified Program Integrity Contractors and regional federal program integrity contractors for the Medicare and Medicaid programs that may result in recoupment of funds. In addition, our segmentsclients may be subject to certain audits that may result in recoupment of funds from our clients that may, in turn, implicate us. We could be adversely affected in the event such an audit results in negative findings and recoupment from or penalties to our customers.

Our contracts are subject to an increased riskstringent claims and invoice processing regimes which vary depending on the customer and nature of litigationthe payment mechanism. Government entities may take the position that if a transport cannot be matched to a medically necessary healthcare event, or is conducted inconsistently with contractual, regulatory or even policy requirements, payment for such transport may be recouped by such customer. Likewise, a government surveyor may determine that a personal care visit was not sufficiently supported by a time and attendance record and/or that the aide was not qualified on a particular date of service and seek a refund as a result.

While we carefully and regularly review documentation, and coding and billing practices, the rules are frequently vague and confusing and they cannot ensure that governmental investigators, private insurers or private whistleblowers will not challenge our practices. Such a challenge could result in a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.



45


We could be subject to civil penalties and loss of business if we fail to comply with applicable bribery, corruption and other legal actions and liabilities.regulations governing business with public organizations.

As government contractors, our segmentsWe are subject to an increased riskthe federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits the offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of investigation,any form of remuneration in return for referring, ordering, leasing, purchasing or arranging for or recommending the ordering, purchasing or leasing of items or services payable by a federally funded healthcare program. Any of our financial relationships with healthcare providers will be potentially implicated by this statute to the extent Medicare or Medicaid referrals are implicated. Violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute could result in substantial civil or criminal prosecution, civil fraud, whistleblower lawsuits and other legal actions and liabilities that are not as frequently experienced by companies that do not provide government sponsored services. Companies providing government sponsored services can also become involved in public inquiries which can lead to negative media speculation or potential cancellation or terminationpenalties, including criminal fines of contracts. In WD Services in Europe, European procurement regulations in force in each European Union member state require public procurement authorities to impose a ban from participating in public procurement tenders for up to five years, or until the organization in question has put in place “self clean” measures to the satisfaction$100,000 per violation, imprisonment of the procuring authority, where companies are found guilty of fraud or certain other criminal offenses. Authorities can also exercise their discretion to blacklist companies for up to twoten years, where they believe theycivil penalties under the Civil Monetary Penalties Law of up to $100,000 per violation, plus three times the remuneration involved, civil penalties under the False Claims Act of up to $22,363 for each claim submitted, plus three times the amounts paid for such claims and exclusion from participation in the Medicaid and Medicare programs. Any such penalties could have been involveda significant negative effect on our operations. Furthermore, the exclusion could result in actssignificant reductions in our revenues, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position and results of gross misconductoperations.

Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations with respect to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters may impose additional costs on us, impact our access to capital, or until the organization in question has put in place “self clean” measuresexpose us to the satisfaction of the procuring authority. The occurrence of any of these actions, regardless of the outcome, could disrupt our operationsnew or additional risks.

Increased focus, including from regulators, investors, employees and clients, on ESG matters may result in increased costs (including but not limited to increased costs related to compliance and stakeholder engagement), impact our reputation, or otherwise affect our business performance. Negative public perception, adverse publicity or negative comments in social media could limitdamage our abilityreputation or harm our relationships with regulators, employees or our customers, if we do not, or are not perceived to, obtain additional contracts in other jurisdictions. Further, government tenders inadequately address these issues, including if we fail to demonstrate progress towards any current or future ESG goals. Any harm to our reputation could negatively impact employee engagement and retention and the U.S., the European Union and other countries can be subject to challenge where the procurer has not followed the correct processes, or where they seek to make material amendments to contracts after award. Consequently, it can be very difficult to convince governmentwillingness of customers to amend their contracts, even where circumstances have changed significantly, because they are concerned that if challenged theydo business with us. At the same time, various stakeholders may have divergent views on ESG matters.
This divergence increases the risk that any action or lack thereof with respect to re-procureESG matters will be perceived negatively by at least some stakeholders and adversely impact our reputation and business. It is possible that stakeholders may not be satisfied with our ESG practices or the entire service. This can pose significant risks in termsspeed of their adoption. At the same time, certain stakeholders might not be satisfied if we adopt ESG practices at all. Actual or perceived shortcomings with respect to our ESG practices and reporting could negatively impact our business. We could also incur additional costs and require additional resources to monitor, report, and comply with various ESG practices. In addition, a variety of organizations have developed ratings to measure the performance of companies on ESG topics, and the results of some of these assessments are widely publicized. Such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment and voting decisions. In addition, many investors have created their own proprietary ratings that inform their investment and voting decisions. Unfavorable ratings of our company or our industry, as well as omission of inclusion of our stock into ESG-oriented investment funds, may lead to negative investor sentiment and the diversion of investment to other companies or industries, which could have a negative impact on our stock price and our access to and cost management and profitability. of capital.

Our segments’ businesses arebusiness is subject to licensing regulations and other regulatory provisions, including provisions governing surveys and audits. Changesaudits, and changes to, or violations of, these regulations could negatively impact our segments’ revenues.us.

In many of the locations where our segmentswe operate, theywe are required by local laws (both U.S. and foreign) to obtain and maintain licenses. The applicable state and local licensing requirements govern the services our segmentswe provide, the credentials of staff, record keeping, treatment planning, client monitoring and supervision of staff. The failure to maintain these licenses or the loss of a license could have a material adverse impact on our segments’ businessesus and could prevent themus from providing services to clients in a given jurisdiction. Our segments’ contracts are subject to surveys or audit by their payersour payors or their clients. Our segmentsWe are also subject to regulations that restrict theirour ability to contract directly with a government agency in certain situations. Such restrictions could affect our segments’ ability to contract with certain payerspayors and clients, and could have a material adverse impact on our segments’financial condition and results of operations.



Our segments’ contracts are subject to audit and modification by the payerspayors with whom our segmentswe contract, at their sole discretion.discretion, and any such audits and modifications could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

Our segments’ businesses depend on theirour ability to perform successfully perform under various government funded contracts. Under the terms of these contracts, payers,payors, government agencies or their proxy contractors can review our segments’ compliance or performance, as well as our segments’ records and general business practices, at any time, and may in their discretion:


suspend or prevent our segmentsus from receiving new contracts or extending existing contracts because of violations or suspected violations of procurement laws or regulations;
terminate or modify our segments’ existing contracts;
seek to recoup the amount we were paid and/or reduce the amount our segmentswe are paid under our existing contracts; or
46


audit and object to our segments’ contract related fees.

Any increase in the number or scope of audits could increase our segments’ expenses, and the audit process may disrupt the day-to-day operations of our segments’ businessesbusiness and distract their management. If payerspayors have significant audit findings, or if they make material modifications to our segments’ contracts, it could have a material adverse impact on our segments’ results of operations.

Contract profitability may decline due to actions by governmental agencies or penalties that are based on government generated statistical information that may not be known to us in advance.
WD Services’ operating costs and profitability may be significantly impacted by actions required by a government agency, such as the availability of information systems maintained by the government to streamline enrollment into our service programs. Government generated performance statistics, such as the MOJ reoffending report, may not be known to us prior to its release by the government agencies. WD Services may be subject to penalties that are based on such government generated statistics, and we could be required to make material payments, the amounts of which we may not be able to estimate and which could have an adverse effect on our financial conditionposition and results of operations.

In addition, certain contracts may require that we hire former government employees, in relation to offering our service programs, or develop new information technology systems which would serve to replace legacy systems operated by the government. Lastly, revenue under certain contracts may be adjusted prospectively if client volumes are below expectations or client profiles change materially, which may also lead to cost or productivity changes. If the Company is unable to adjust its costs accordingly, profitability is negatively impacted.
Our estimated income taxes could be materially different from income taxes that we ultimately pay.
We are subject to income taxation in both the U.S. and 10 foreign countries, including specific states or provinces where we operate. Our overall effective income tax rate is a function of applicable local tax rates and the geographic mix of our income from continuing operations before taxes, which is itself impacted by currency movements. Consequently, the isolated or combined effects of unfavorable movements in tax rates, geographic mix, or foreign exchange rates could reduce our after-tax income.

Our annual tax rate is based on our income and the tax laws in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant judgment and estimation is required in determining our annual income tax expense and in evaluating our tax positions and related matters. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determinations are uncertain or otherwise subject to interpretation. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related disputes could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions and accruals. In addition, we make judgments regarding the applicability of tax treaties and the appropriate application of transfer pricing regulations. In the event one taxing jurisdiction disagrees with another taxing jurisdiction with respect to the amount or applicability of a particular type of tax, or the amount or availability of a particular type of tax refund or credit, we could experience temporary or permanent double taxation and increased professional fees to resolve such taxation matters. Our determination of our income tax liability is always subject to review by applicable tax authorities, and we have been audited by various jurisdictions in prior years. Although we believe our income tax estimates and related determinations are reasonable and appropriate, relevant taxing authorities may disagree. The ultimate outcome of any such audits and reviews could be materially different from the estimates and determinations reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. Any adverse outcome of any such audit or review could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and the results of our operations.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Reform Act”), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017, significantly affected U.S. income tax law by changing how the U.S. imposes income tax on multinational corporations. We have recorded in our consolidated financial statements provisional amounts based on our current estimates of the effects of the Tax Reform Act in


accordance with our current understanding of the Tax Reform Act and currently available guidance. For additional information regarding the Tax Reform Act and the provisional tax amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements, see “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies”. The final amounts may be significantly affected by regulations and interpretive guidance expected to be issued by the tax authorities, clarifications of the accounting treatment of various items, our additional analysis, and our refinement of our estimates of the effects of the Tax Reform Act and, therefore, such final amounts may be materially different than our current provisional amounts, which could materially affect our tax obligations and effective tax rate.

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness and Economic Conditions

Restrictive covenantsOur existing debt agreements contain restrictions that limit our flexibility in operating our business and could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Our agreements covering our outstanding indebtedness, including the New Credit Agreement mayand the indentures governing our Notes due 2025 and 2029, respectively, contain various covenants that limit our current and future operations, particularlyor will limit our ability to respond to changesengage in our business or to pursue our business strategies.
The terms contained in thespecified types of transactions. These agreements that govern certain of our indebtedness, including our Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement (as amended, supplemented, or modified, the “Credit Agreement”), and the agreements that govern any future indebtedness of ours, may, include a number of restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions, including restrictions on our ability to take actions that we believe may be in our best interest. These agreements, among other things, limit our ability to:


incur additional debt;
provide guarantees in respect of obligations of other persons;
issue redeemable stock and preferred stock;
pay dividends or distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock;
make loans, investments and capital expenditures;acquisitions;
enter into transactions with affiliates;
create or incur liens;
make distributions from our subsidiaries;
permit contractual obligations that burden our ability to make distributions from our subsidiaries;
sell assets and capital stock of our subsidiaries;
make acquisitions;prepayments on subordinated debt; and
consolidate or merge with or into, or sell substantially all of our assets to, another person.

In addition, our agreements covering our outstanding indebtedness, including the New Credit Agreement and the indentures governing our Notes due 2025 and 2029, require us to meet financial covenants associated with that debt, and contain cross-default provisions. For example, the New Credit Agreement contains an affirmative covenant regarding our Total Net Leverage Ratio as of the end of each of our fiscal quarters. See Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information regarding the New Credit Agreement and the Total Net Leverage Ratio.

A breach of theany of these covenants or restrictions could result in a default under the applicable agreements that govern our indebtedness. Suchindebtedness including as a result of cross default may preclude us from drawing from our senior secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) or allow the creditors to accelerate the related debtprovisions, and, may result in the accelerationcase of our New Credit Facility, permit the lenders to cease making loans to us. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under our New Credit Facility, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under our New Credit Facility to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. Such actions by those lenders could cause cross defaults under our other indebtedness resulting in our other indebtedness being declared immediately due and payable, including our Notes due 2025 and 2029. We cannot provide any other debtassurance that we may incur to whichthe holders of such indebtedness would waive a default, including as a result of a cross acceleration or cross-default provision applies.default. In the event of acceleration of our lenders accelerateoutstanding indebtedness, we cannot assure you that we will be able to repay the repaymentdebt or obtain new financing to refinance the debt. Even if new financing is made available to us, it may not be on terms acceptable to us. If we were unable to repay these amounts, certain debt holders could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure the indebtedness, including the equity of subsidiary guarantors that we have pledged as collateral, pursuant to our New Credit Agreement. If any of the foregoing were to occur, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected and the value of our equity could be materially diminished.

We have substantial indebtedness and lease obligations that could restrict our financial opportunities and competitive position and we may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness which could harm our operations and business.

Our substantial indebtedness and lease obligations could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry, expose us to interest rate risk to the extent of our variable rate indebtedness, and prevent us from meeting our obligations under the New Credit Facility and our Notes due 2025 and 2029. Our substantial indebtedness and lease obligations could have important consequences, including:

increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic, industry or competitive developments;
47


requiring a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness and lease payments under our leases, therefore reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities;
exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates because certain of our borrowings, weincluding borrowings under the New Credit Facility, are at variable rates of interest;
making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness and any failure to comply with the obligations of any of our debt instruments, including restrictive covenants and borrowing conditions, could result in an event of default, including as a result of a cross-default, under the agreements governing such indebtedness, including the New Credit Facility and the Notes due 2025 and 2029;
restricting us from making strategic acquisitions or causing us to make non-strategic divestitures;
imposing restrictions on the operation of our business that may hinder our ability to take advantage of strategic opportunities or to grow our business;
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures (including real estate acquisitions), debt service requirements and general corporate or other purposes, which could be exacerbated by volatility in the credit markets; and
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business or market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to any of our competitors who are less leveraged and who therefore may be able to take advantage of opportunities that our leverage prevents us from exploiting.

Our ability to make scheduled payments on and to refinance our indebtedness depends on and is subject to our financial and operating performance, which in turn is affected by general and regional economic, financial, competitive, business and other factors, all of which are beyond our control, including the availability of financing in the international banking and capital markets and the ongoing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy. We cannot assure you that weour business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our debt, to refinance our debt or to fund our other liquidity needs. Any refinancing or restructuring of our indebtedness could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants that could further restrict our subsidiaries would have sufficient assetsbusiness operations. Further, in the event of a default, including as a result of a cross-default, the holders of our indebtedness could elect to repaydeclare such indebtedness.indebtedness immediately due and payable, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

LossExpiration of our New Credit Agreement, loss of available financing or an inability to renew repay or refinance our debt could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.


At December 31, 2017,The indebtedness subject to our available creditNotes matures in 2025 and 2029 and subject to our New Credit Agreement matures in 2027 and there can be no assurance that we will be able to payoff timely or refinance our Notes or extend our indebtedness under theour New Credit Facility was $188.9 million. The Credit Facility maturesAgreement or enter into a new one on August 2, 2018.terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If our cash on hand is insufficient, or we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows in the future to cover our cash flow and liquidity needs and service our debt, we may be required to seek additional sources of funds, including extending or replacing our indebtedness, refinancing all or a portion of our existing or future debt,indebtedness, incurring additional debtindebtedness to maintain sufficient cash flow to fund our ongoing operating needs pay interest and fund anticipated expenditures. There can be no assurance that any new financing or refinancing will be possible or that any additional financing could be obtained on terms acceptable terms.to us, or at all. If we are unable to obtain additionalneeded financing, we may (i) be unable to satisfy our ongoing obligations, under our outstanding indebtedness, (ii) be unable to pursue future business opportunities or fund acquisitions, (iii) find it more difficult to fund future operating costs, tax payments or general corporate expenditures, and (iv) become vulnerable to adverse general economic, capital markets and industry conditions. Any of these circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity and results of operations.




We may incur substantial additional indebtedness, in the future, which could impair our financial condition.

We may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future to fund our activities, including but not limited to fund share repurchases, acquisitions, cash dividends and business expansion. While our New Credit Agreement contains restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of significant qualifications and exceptions, and under certain circumstances, the amount of indebtedness that could be incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. Any existing and futureadditional indebtedness increaseswould increase the risk that we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay amounts due in respect of such indebtedness.indebtedness, and the risks that we already face as a result of our leverage would intensify. Future substantial indebtedness could also have other important consequences on our business. For example, it could:


make it more difficult for us to satisfy our existing obligations;
make it more difficult to renew or enter into new contracts with existing and potential future clients;
48


limit our ability to borrow additional amounts to fund, among other things, working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, the execution of our business strategy or acquisitions and other purposes;acquisitions;
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to pay principal and interest on our debt, which would reduce the funds available to us for other purposes;
restrict our ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from any such dispositions;
restrict our ability to raise debt or equity capital to be used to repay other indebtedness when it becomes due;
make us more vulnerable to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions, as well as in government regulation and to our business; and
expose us to risks inherent in interest rate fluctuations because some of our borrowings are at variable rates of interest, which could result in higher interest expensesexpense in the event of increases in interest rates; andrates.
make it more difficult to satisfy our financial obligations.

Our ability to satisfy and manage our debt obligations depends on our ability to generate cash flow and on overall financial market conditions. To some extent, this is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to permit us to pay principal, premium, if any, or interest on our debt obligations. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our debt obligations and meet our other cash needs, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell or curtail assets or operations, seek additional capital, or seek to restructure or refinance our indebtedness. If we must sell or curtail our assets or operations, it may negatively affect our ability to generate revenue.

Risks Related to Our CapitalCommon Stock

If we are unable to remediate the identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, or if we experience additional material weaknesses or other deficiencies or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately and timely report our financial results, in which case our business may be harmed, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, and the price of our common stock may decline.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for evaluating and reporting on the effectiveness of our system of internal control. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). We are required to furnish annually a report by management of its assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of our most recent fiscal year. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm is required to provide a related attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting.

In connection with our 2023 year-end assessment of internal control over financial reporting, we determined that, as of December 31, 2023, the material weaknesses related to the ineffective general information technology controls ("GITCs") and process-level control activities in the revenue and payroll processes within the PCS segment were unremediated as of December 31, 2023. The material weaknesses were largely a result of the continued integration of the PCS segment and the high volume of transactions across their disparate systems. For further discussion of the material weaknesses identified and our remedial efforts, see Item 9A, Controls and Procedures.

Remediation efforts place a significant burden on management and add increased pressure to our financial resources and processes. As a result, we may not be successful in making the improvements necessary to remediate the material weaknesses identified by management, or do so in a timely manner, or identify and remediate additional control deficiencies, including material weaknesses, in the future.

If we are unable to remediate successfully our existing or any future material weaknesses or other deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting: the accuracy and timing of our financial reporting may be adversely affected; our liquidity, our access to capital markets, the perceptions of our creditworthiness, and our ability to complete acquisitions may be adversely affected; we may be unable to maintain compliance with applicable securities laws, NASDAQ listing requirements, and the covenants under our debt instruments or derivative arrangements regarding the timely filing of periodic reports; we may be subject to regulatory investigations and penalties; investors may lose confidence in our financial reporting; and we may suffer defaults, accelerations, or cross-accelerations under our debt instruments or derivative arrangements to the extent we are unable to obtain waivers from the required creditors or counterparties or are unable to cure any breaches. If any such event or circumstance were to occur, our stock price could decline and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

49


Future sales of shares of our common stock by existing stockholders could cause our stock price to decline.

Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. As of December 31, 2023, we had 19,775,041 shares of common stock outstanding that were freely transferable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, unless held by or purchased by our “affiliates” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Shares of our common stock held by or purchased by our affiliates are restricted or “covered” securities within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act, but will be eligible for resale subject to applicable volume, means of sale, holding period and other limitations of Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

With respect to our stockholders Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P. and Blackwell Partners, LLC - Series A, as well as our former stockholder Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P, which we sometimes refer to collectively as the Coliseum Stockholders, any or all of which may continue to be considered an affiliate or affiliates of ours, we have filed a registration statement that has been declared effective under the Securities Act covering the resale by the Coliseum Stockholders of an aggregate of 2,982,751 shares of our common stock that continue to be held by the Coliseum Stockholders. As a result, such shares may be sold pursuant to the registration statement without regard to the volume and other limitations of Rule 144 under the Securities Act that would otherwise be applicable to such sales.

We also filed a registration statement under the Securities Act to register additional shares of common stock to be issued under our Amended and Restated 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or Incentive Plan, and, as a result, all shares of common stock acquired upon exercise of stock options or vesting of shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units or performance-based restricted stock units granted under our Incentive Plan will also be freely tradable under the Securities Act, unless purchased or acquired by our affiliates under the plan. As of December 31, 2023, there were vested stock options outstanding and exercisable to purchase a total of 42,054 shares of our common stock and there were 504,110 shares of our common stock subject to restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, and performance-based restricted stock units under the Incentive Plan. In addition, 792,338 shares of our common stock are reserved for future issuances under the Incentive Plan.

Our annual operating results and stock price may be volatile or may decline significantly regardless of our operating performance.

Our annual operating results and the market price for our Common Stockcommon stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, many of which we cannot control, including:


changes in rates or coverage for services by payers;payors;
changes in Medicaid, Medicare or other U.S.United States federal or state rules, regulations policies or applicable foreign regulations, policies and technical guidance, including UK health, employment and criminal justice legislation and guidance, Saudi Arabian licensing and Saudization rules, as well as other foreign laws applicable to our business;policies;
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market;
market conditions or trends in our industry or the economy as a whole;whole, including increases in the minimum wage requirements in various jurisdictions in which we operate, and fluctuations in the size of the Medicare member population as well as overall health of its members;
increased competition, in any of our segments, including through insourcing of services by our clients and new entrants to the market;
other events or factors, including those resultingnegative effects from war, incidents of terrorism, natural disasters, pandemics, or responses to these events;
changes in tax law;laws; and
changes in accounting principles.

If any of these events or circumstances were to impact our results or stock price, our common stock price could decrease and the value of an investment in our common stock would experience a corresponding decrease.

In addition, the stock markets, and in particular the NASDAQ, Global Select Market, have experienced considerable price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. In the past, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we become involved in securities litigation, we could incur substantial costs, and our resources and the attention of management could be diverted from our business.



The Company depends on its subsidiaries for cash to fund all of its operations and expenses, including to make future dividend payments or to fund stock repurchases, if any.any, and there can be no assurance that our subsidiaries will make available to us the funds necessary for us to fund our operations and capital needs.

Our operations are conducted entirely through our subsidiaries and oursubsidiaries. Our ability to generate cash to fund all of our operations and expenses, to pay dividends or complete stock repurchase programs, or to meet any debt service obligations is highly dependent on theour subsidiaries’ earnings and the receipt of funds from our subsidiaries viaby way of dividends or
50


intercompany loans. We dohave not currently expect to declare or paypaid any cash dividends on our Common Stock forcommon stock and do not expect to pay any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future; however,future. We currently intend to invest our and our subsidiaries’ future earnings, if any, to fund our growth, to develop our business, invest in our technology, for working capital needs and for general corporate purposes. To the extent that we determine in the future to pay dividends on our Common Stock,common stock, however, none of our subsidiaries will be obligated to make funds available to us for the payment of dividends. Similarly, our subsidiaries are not obligated to make funds available to us to fund stock repurchases. Further, the agreement governing our New Credit Agreement significantly restricts the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends, make loans or otherwise transfer assets to us. In addition, Delaware law may impose requirements that may restrictimposes solvency restrictions on our ability to pay dividends to holders of our Common Stock.common stock. Therefore, you are not likely to receive any dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future and the success of an investment in shares of our common stock will depend upon any future appreciation in their value. There is no guarantee that shares of our common stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which stockholders have purchased their shares. Furthermore, if the subsidiaries are unable or unwilling to fund our cash needs when needed or desired, our results of operations and business and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish misleading or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our Common Stock will dependcommon stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more analysts downgrade our stock or publish misleading or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline.decline in reaction to such information. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our common stock could decrease, which could cause our common stock price or trading volume to decline.
Future sales of shares by existing stockholders could cause our stock price to decline.
Sales of substantial amounts of our Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our Common Stock to decline. As of March 5, 2018, we had 12,866,551 outstanding shares of Common Stock which are freely transferable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), unless held by or purchased by our “affiliates” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Shares of our Common Stock held by or purchased by our affiliates are restricted securities within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act, but will be eligible for resale subject to applicable volume, means of sale, holding period and other limitations of Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
As of March 5, 2018, shares of our convertible preferred stock were convertible into 2,014,042 shares of Common Stock, all of which are subject to registration rights. In addition, as of March 5, 2018, 1,653,755 shares of Common Stock are beneficially owned by entities for which Coliseum Capital Management acts as investment adviser.
In August 2016, we filed a registration statement under the Securities Act to register additional shares of Common Stock to be issued under our equity compensation plans and, as a result, all shares of Common Stock acquired upon exercise of stock options granted under our plans will also be freely tradable under the Securities Act, unless purchased by our affiliates. As of December 31, 2017, there were stock options outstanding to purchase a total of 606,695 shares of our Common Stock and there were 111,157 shares of our Common Stock subject to restricted stock awards. In addition, 1,938,666 shares of our Common Stock are reserved for future issuances under the plan.

The terms of our Preferred Stock contain restrictive covenants that may impair our ability to conduct business and we may not be able to maintain compliance with the obligations under our outstanding Preferred Stock which could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations and our stock price.

On February 11, 2015 and March 12, 2015, we issued $65.5 million and $15.8 million, respectively, of Preferred Stock. The terms of the Preferred Stock require us to pay mandatory quarterly dividends, either in cash or through an increase in the stated principal value of such stock. Our ability to satisfy and manage our obligations under our outstanding Preferred Stock depends, in part, on our ability to generate cash flow and on overall financial market conditions. Additionally, the terms of our Preferred Stock contain operating and financial covenants that limit management’s discretion with respect to certain business matters. Among other things, these covenants, subject to certain limitations and exceptions, restrict our ability to incur additional debt, sell or otherwise dispose of our assets, make acquisitions, and merge or consolidate with other entities. As a result of these covenants and restrictions, we may be limited in how we conduct our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations and our stock price.


Future offerings of debt or equity securities that would rank senior to our Common Stock, may adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.
If, in the future, we decide to issue debt or equity securities that rank senior to our Common Stock, it is likely that such securities will be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility. Additionally, any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of our Common Stock and may result in dilution to owners of our Common Stock. We and, indirectly, our stockholders, will bear the cost of issuing and servicing such securities. Because our decision to issue debt or equity securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, holders of our Common Stock will bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our Common Stock and diluting the value of their stock holdings in us.
Fulfilling our obligations incident to being a public company, including with respect to the requirements of and related rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is expensive and time-consuming, and any delays or difficulties in satisfying these obligations could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations and our stock price.
We are subject to the reporting and corporate governance requirements, under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), that apply to issuers of listed equity, which impose certain significant compliance costs and obligations upon us. Being a publicly listed company requires a significant commitment of additional resources and management oversight resulting in increased operating costs. These requirements also place additional demands on our finance and accounting staff and on our financial accounting and information systems. Other expenses associated with being a public company include increases in auditing, accounting and legal fees and expenses, investor relations expenses, increased directors’ fees and director and officer liability insurance costs, registrar and transfer agent fees and listing fees, as well as other expenses. As a public company, we are required, among other things, to define and expand the roles and the duties of our Board of Directors (“Board”) and its committees and institute more comprehensive compliance and investor relations functions.

If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, the accuracy and timing of our financial reporting may be adversely affected. Preparing our consolidated financial statements involves a number of complex manual and automated processes, which are dependent upon individual data input or review and require significant management judgment. One or more of these elements may result in errors that may not be detected and could result in a material misstatement of our consolidated financial statements. If a material misstatement occurs in the future, we may fail to meet our future reporting obligations. For example, we may fail to file periodic reports in a timely manner or may need to restate our financial results, either of which may cause the price of our common stock to decline. In addition, our WD Services business is subject to the European Union’s and other countries’ data security and protection laws and regulations, which may make it more difficult for the Company to maintain the records and internal accounting practices necessary to ensure the appropriate operation of our internal controls or to detect corruption or increasing the Company’s costs to maintain appropriate controls.

If the accounting estimates we make, and the assumptions on which we rely, in preparing our financial statements prove inaccurate, our actual results may be adversely affected.

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments about, among other things, taxes, revenue recognition, contingent obligations, NET Services transportation expense, recoverability of long-lived assets and doubtful accounts. In addition, our foreign operations report their results pursuant to International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, or local accounting standards, which requires judgment to convert into GAAP. Lastly, the implementation of ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018, requires a significant level of judgment and estimation, especially in regards to contingent or success-based payments, such as those prevalent at WD Services. These estimates and judgments affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, the amounts of charges accrued by us, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances and at the time they are made. If our estimates or the assumptions underlying them are not correct, we may need to accrue additional charges or reduce the value of assets that could adversely affect our results of operations, leading to a loss in investor confidence in our ability to manage our business and our stock price could decline.



Anti-takeover provisions in our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, and amended and restated by-lawsbylaws could discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company and may affect the trading price of our Common Stock.common stock.

Our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, and amended and restated bylaws include a number of provisions that may be deemed to have anti-takeover effects, which includeincluding provisions governing when and by whom special meetings of our stockholders may be called, and provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent a change in our management or control over us that stockholders may consider favorable. SuchAs a result of these provisions, holders of our common stock may prevent our stockholders from receivingnot receive the full benefit fromof any premium to the market price of our Common Stockcommon stock offered by a bidder in a takeover context.

Even in the absence of a takeover attempt, the existence of these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our Common Stockcommon stock if the provisions are viewed as discouraging takeover attempts in the future. Our second amended and restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, and amended and restated by-lawsbylaws, as amended, may also make it difficult for stockholders to replace or remove our management.management, including, no cumulative voting for the election of directors, provisions governing director vacancies, which are filled only by remaining directors (including vacancies resulting from removal or other cause), and, until the phase-out of our staggered Board of Directors (the "Board") is complete in 2025, provisions providing for staggered terms for certain members of the Board. These provisions may facilitate management entrenchment that may delay, deter, render more difficult or prevent a change in our control, which may not be in the best interests of our stockholders.

We do not expect to pay dividends on our Common Stock and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our Common Stock.
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.
We currently do not expect to declare and pay dividends on our Common Stock for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to invest our future earnings, if any, to fund our growth, to develop our business, for working capital needs and for general corporate purposes. Therefore, you are not likely to receive any dividends on your Common Stock for the foreseeable future and the success of an investment in shares of our Common Stock will depend upon any future appreciation in their value. There is no guarantee that shares of our Common Stock will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which stockholders have purchased their shares.
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments.
 
None.
 
Item 2.
Item 1C.Cybersecurity.
Properties.
 
Risk Management and Strategy.

Our information technology ("IT") systems are critically important to our existing business operations and growth strategy. We provide services to individuals and others that require us to collect, process, maintain and retain sensitive and personal client confidential information in our IT systems, including patient identifiable health information, financial information and other personal information about our customers and end-users, such as names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, identification numbers, sensitive health data, and payment account information. As a result, we are subject to complex and evolving United States privacy laws and regulations, including those pertaining to the handling of personal data, such as HIPAA and CCPA. In addition to protecting the privacy of all health-related information for our members, our IT infrastructure supports the operations of all aspects of our business and ensures that we are able to continue to serve our
51


members' transportation, personal care, and remote monitoring needs and execute our strategy to better connect people with care.

The Company's Enterprise Risk Management Team (the "ERM Team") works in collaboration with the Company's Information Security Team to set the enterprise risk strategy and make risk-informed decisions, which include the assessment and response to cybersecurity risk. The Company maintains an information security, technology, and cybersecurity risk management program overseen by the Chief Information Security Officer (the "CISO") that uses a risk-based methodology to support the security, confidentiality, integrity, and availability of its information. The Company's information security, technology, and cybersecurity risk management program provides the structure for managing the respective risks utilizing a combination of automated tools, documented processes, and third-party assessments to identify and assess potential cybersecurity risks. The Company engages third parties in connection with its cybersecurity program. Third party monitoring activities include the use of Security Information Event Monitoring ("SIEM") software and regularly scheduled vulnerability assessments performed by an independent third-party to capture and identify vulnerabilities, security events, and potential incidents.The Company also maintains a formal information security training program that includes training on matters such as phishing and email security best practices as well as data privacy which is required for all employees on an annual basis.

While processes are in place to minimize the chance of a successful cyberattack, the Company has established incident response policies and procedures to address a cyber threat that may occur despite these safeguards. In these instances, the Company maintains a cybersecurity incident response policy (the "Incident Response Policy") and cybersecurity incident response plan (the "Incident Response Plan") to help ensure a timely, consistent and compliant response to actual or attempted cybersecurity incidents impacting the Company. The Incident Response Plan includes (1) detection, (2) analysis, which may include timely notice to the Audit Committee of our Board if deemed material or appropriate, (3) containment, (4) eradication, (5) recovery and (6) post-incident review. The Incident Response Plan includes leveraging the Company's cross-functional Cybersecurity Incident Committee that is supported by an organizational structure that includes executives across the Information Security, ERM, Finance, Legal, and Investor Relations functions of the business. The Cybersecurity Incident Committee is responsible for assessing the materiality of any cybersecurity incidents and for communicating any such incidents to the appropriate parties outside the Company.

The Company relies on our IT systems and networks in connection with many of our business activities. Some of these networks and systems are managed by third-party service providers and are not under our direct control. The Company has implemented processes to manage the cybersecurity risks associated with its use of third-party service providers, including processes during the contract review phase by both Information Security and Legal teams providing contractual safeguards as well as ongoing monitoring of third-party service providers for incidents that may affect the Company. To date, no cybersecurity incidents have had such a material adverse effect on us, and we are not presently aware of any cybersecurity threats that are reasonably likely to materially affect us.

Despite the security measures we have implemented, certain cyber incidents could materially disrupt our operational systems, compromise personally identifiable information regarding customers or employees, delay our ability to provide critical services to our customers, and/or jeopardize the security of our facilities. We continuously seek to maintain a robust program of information security and controls, but the impact of a material information technology event could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, reputation, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Governance.

Board's Roles and Responsibilities

The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing and monitoring the Company's information security, technology, and cybersecurity program and other IT and data privacy risks, controls, strategies, and procedures. The Audit Committee is comprised of board members with expertise in the areas of risk management, finance and technology, enabling them to effectively oversee such cybersecurity and other IT and data privacy risks. The Audit Committee receives updates from management as needed or at least quarterly which cover the Company's current cybersecurity and other IT and data privacy risk assessments and key risk areas. The Audit Committee also reviews and discusses with management, at least quarterly, and as needed, any material or significant cyber incidents that have occurred or are reasonably likely to occur. In addition, the Audit Committee receives regular updates on cybersecurity trends and emerging threats from the Information Security Team led by the CISO.

Management's Roles and Responsibilities

In collaboration with the ERM team and the Audit Committee, the Company's Information Security Team, overseen by the CISO, is responsible for assessing and managing cybersecurity risks including the prevention, mitigation, detection, and remediation of cybersecurity incidents. The Information Security Team is comprised of various IT groups with the knowledge and expertise needed to execute the technical aspect of the Incident Response Plan. This team is led by the CISO and other
52


technical leaders with significant experience in the information security field. The CISO has over 18 years of experience serving as a CISO and in other security leadership positions in the information security and cybersecurity fields, including roles as VP of Information Security, Director of Infrastructure, Director of Information Security, and Manager of Information Security. In addition to his work experience, the CISO holds a certification as a Certified Information System Security Professional (CISSP). The CISO works closely with other management positions, including the Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Information Officer, Chief Audit Officer, Deputy General Counsel, and VP of Investor Relations through the Cybersecurity Incident Committee in order to ensure that the Company has effective communication and understanding of its cybersecurity risk management.

The processes by which the Information Security Team and CISO monitor the prevention, mitigation, detection, and remediation of cybersecurity incidents include regular vulnerability assessments and penetration testing, security incident and event management, continuous monitoring, and threat and intelligence gathering. The CISO reports to the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis, and as needed, to provide an overview of our cybersecurity risk posture, the effectiveness of our cybersecurity policies, procedures, and strategies, and any material or significant cybersecurity incidents that have occurred or are likely to occur.

Item 2.Properties.

Our principal executive office isoffices are located in Stamford, Connecticut,Denver, Colorado, where we have leased approximately 73,000 square feet of corporate office and operations space through September 2032. In addition, we continue to lease our former principal executive offices located in Atlanta, Georgia, where we have leased through June 2024 approximately 30,000 square feet of corporate office and operations space.The offices in Atlanta, Georgia, as well as 28 other leased facilities that serve as both office and operational space, are utilized substantially in our NEMT segment.

We maintain offices for our PCS segment in Valley Stream, New York, where we have leased through November 2025 corporate office and operations space. This office as well as an additional 83 locations of leased office and operational space support our PCS segment.

We maintain offices for our RPM segment in Franklin, Ohio, where we own the real estate for corporate office and operations space. In addition, we own real estate for our RPM segment in Sullivan, Illinois and we lease additional officerent coworking space in Tucson, Arizona. As of March 2, 2018, NET Services leases space in approximately 40various other locations WD Services leases space in approximately 220 locations, and Matrix leases space in five locations. as needed to support our operations.

The lease terms vary andfor all of our leased facilities, but we believe that they are all generally at market rates. We further believe that our properties are adequate for our current business needs and in any event we believe that we can obtain adequate additional or alternative space at market rates, if needed, to meet our foreseeable business needs.


Item 3.
Legal Proceedings.
On June 15, 2015, a putative stockholder class action derivative complaint was filedItem 3.Legal Proceedings.

From time-to-time, we may become involved in legal proceedings arising in the Courtordinary course of Chanceryour business. We record accruals for outstanding legal matters when it is believed to be probable that a loss will be incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Management, following consultation with legal counsel, does not expect the ultimate disposition of any or a combination of any such ongoing or anticipated matters to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. We cannot predict with certainty, however, the potential for or outcome of any litigation. Regardless of the Stateoutcome of Delaware (the “Court”), captioned Haverhill Retirement System v. Kerley et al., C.A. No. 11149-VCL (the “Haverhill Litigation”). The complaint named Richard A. Kerley, Kristi L. Meints, Warren S. Rustand, Christopher Shackelton (the “Individual Defendants”) and Coliseum Capital Management, LLC (“Coliseum Capital Management”) as defendants, and the Company as a nominal defendant. The complaint purported to allege that the dividend rate increase term originally in the Company’s outstanding Preferred Stock was an impermissibly coercive measure that impaired the voting rights of the Company’s stockholders in connection with the vote on the removal of certain voting and conversion caps previously applicable to the Preferred Stock (the “Caps”), and that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by approving the dividend rate increase term and attempting to coerce the stockholder vote relating to the Company’s Preferred Stock, and by failing to disclose all material information necessary to allow the Company’s stockholders to cast an informed vote on the Caps. The complaint also purported to allege derivative claims alleging that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by entering into the subordinated note and standby agreement with Coliseum Capital Management, and granting Coliseum Capital Management certain stock options. The complaint further alleged that Coliseum Capital Management aided and abetted the Individual Defendants in breaching their fiduciary duties. The complaint sought, among other things, an injunction prohibiting the stockholder vote relating to the dividend rate increase, corporate governance reforms, unspecified damages and other relief.
On August 31, 2015, after arms’ length negotiations, the parties reached an agreement in principle and executed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) providing for the settlement of claims concerning the dividend rate increase term and stockholder vote and related disclosure. The MOU stated that the Defendants had entered into the partial settlement of the litigation solely to eliminate the distraction, burden, expense, and potential delay of further litigation involving claims that have been settled. Pursuant to the partial settlement, the Company agreed to supplement the disclosures in its definitive proxy statement on Schedule


14A (the “2015 Proxy Statement”), Coliseum Capital Management and certain of its affiliates and the Company entered into an amendment to that certain Series A Preferred Stock Exchange Agreement, by and among Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P., Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P., Blackwell Partners, LLC, and The Providence Service Corporation dated as of February 11, 2015 described in the 2015 Proxy Statement, and the Board agreed to adopt a policy related to the Board’s determination each quarter as to whether the Company should pay cash dividends or allow dividends to be paid in the form of PIK dividends on the Preferred Stock, as further described in the supplemental proxy disclosures. On September 2, 2015, Providence issued supplemental disclosures through a supplement to the 2015 Proxy Statement. On September 16, 2015, Providence stockholders approved the removal of the Caps. The Company provided notice of the proposed partial settlement to Providence’s stockholders by December 11, 2015. At a hearing on February 9, 2016, the court denied approval of the settlement. The Court indicated that plaintiff’s counsel could petition the Court for a mootness fee, and that defendants would have the opportunity to oppose any such application.
On January 12, 2016, the plaintiff filed a verified amended class action and derivative complaint (the “first amended complaint”). In addition to the defendants named in the earlier complaint, the first amended complaint named David Shackelton, Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P., Blackwell Partners, LLC, Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P. (collectively, and together with Coliseum Capital Management, LLC, “Coliseum”) and RBC Capital Markets, LLC (“RBC Capital Markets”) as additional defendants. The first amended complaint purported to allege direct and derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty against some or all of the Individual Defendants and David Shackelton (collectively, the “Amended Individual Defendants”) regarding the approval of the subordinated note, the rights offering, the standby agreement with Coliseum Capital Management, and the grant to Coliseum Capital Management of certain stock options. The first amended complaint also purported to allege an additional derivative claim for unjust enrichment against Coliseum and further alleged that Coliseum and RBC Capital Markets aided and abetted the Amended Individual Defendants in breaching their fiduciary duties. The first amended complaint sought, among other things, revision or rescission of the terms of the subordinated note and Preferred Stock, corporate governance reforms, unspecified damages and other relief.
On May 6, 2016, the plaintiff filed a verified second amended class action and derivative complaint (the “second amended complaint”). In addition to the defendants named in the earlier complaint, the second amended complaint named Paul Hastings LLP (“Paul Hastings”) and Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”) as additional defendants. In addition to previously asserted claims, the second amended complaint purported to assert direct and derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duties against Coliseum Capital Management, in its capacity as the controlling stockholder of the Company, in connection with the subordinated note, the Company’s rights offering of Preferred Stock and the standby purchase agreement with Coliseum Capital Management (the “Financing Transactions”). The second amended complaint also alleged that Paul Hastings breached their fiduciary duties as counsel to the Company in connection with the Financing Transactions and that BofA and Paul Hastings aided and abetted certain of the Amended Individual Defendants in breaching their fiduciary duties in connection with the Financing Transactions. The second amended complaint sought, among other things, revision or rescission of the terms of the subordinated note and Preferred Stock, corporate governance reforms, disgorgement of fees paid to RBC Capital Markets, Paul Hastings and BofA for work relating to the Financing Transactions, unspecified damages and other relief.
On May 20, 2016, the Court granted a six-month stay of the proceeding (which was subsequently extended) to allow a special litigation committee, created by the Board, sufficient time to investigate, review and evaluate the facts, circumstances and claims asserted in or relating to this action and determine the Company’s response thereto. On January 20, 2017, the special litigation committee advised the Court that the parties to theparticular litigation and the specialmerits of any particular claim, litigation committee had reached an agreementcan have a material adverse impact on our company due to, among other reasons, any injunctive relief granted which could inhibit our ability to operate our business, amounts paid as damages or in principlesettlement of any such matter, diversion of management resources and defense costs. Refer to settle all of the claims in the litigation. The parties then entered into a proposed settlement agreement which was submittedNote 17, Commitments and Contingencies, for information concerning other potential contingent liabilities matters that do not rise to the Courtlevel of materiality for approval. On September 28, 2017, the Court approved the proposed settlement agreement among the parties that provided for a settlement amountpurposes of $10 million less plaintiff’s legal fees and expenses (the “Settlement Amount”), with 75% of the Settlement Amount to be paid to the Company and 25% of the Settlement Amount to be paid to holders of the Company’s Common Stock other than certain excluded parties. On November 16, 2017, the Company, as a nominal defendant, received a payment of $5.4 million from the Settlement Amount.disclosure hereunder.

Item 4.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.
Mine Safety Disclosures
 
Not applicable.




53


PART II
 
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
 
Market for our Common Stock
 
Our Common Stock, our only class of common equity, has beenis quoted on NASDAQ under the symbol “PRSC” since August 19, 2003. Prior to that time there was no public market for our Common Stock."MODV". As of March 5, 2018,February 16, 2024, there were 2211 holders of record of our Common Stock. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of our Common Stock for the period indicated, as reported on NASDAQ Global Select Market:
 High Low
2017   
Fourth Quarter$60.59
 $53.84
Third Quarter$54.99
 $49.77
Second Quarter$47.47
 $43.73
First Quarter$41.80
 $37.65
    
2016   
Fourth Quarter$49.97
 $34.89
Third Quarter$50.30
 $43.01
Second Quarter$53.38
 $43.77
First Quarter$55.28
 $42.03




Stock Performance Graph
 
The following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return for our Common Stock, Russell 2000 Index, and NASDAQ Health Services Index and Russell 2000 Index assuming an investment of $100 in each on December 31, 2012.2018.


  2023 Performance Graph - MODV RDG.jpg


Dividends
 
We have not paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock and currently do not expect to pay dividends on our Common Stock. In addition, our ability to pay dividends on our Common Stock is limited by the terms of our New Credit Agreement and our Preferred Stock.Agreement.  The payment of future cash dividends, if any, will be reviewed periodically by the Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, our financial condition, funds from operations, the level of our capital and development expenditures, any restrictions imposed by present or future debt or equity instruments, and changes in federal tax policies, if any.



54




Issuer Sales of Unregistered Securities
There were no sales, including exchanges or conversions, of equity securities by us during the period covered by this Annual Report that were either not registered under the Securities Act or not previously disclosed in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q or current report on Form 8-K previously filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Period 
Total Number
of Shares of
Common Stock
Purchased (1)
 
Average Price
Paid per
Share
 
Total Number of
Shares of Common
Stock Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Program (2)
 
Maximum Dollar
Value of Shares of
Common Stock that
May Yet Be Purchased
Under Program (2)
(in thousands)
Fourth quarter:        
October 1, 2017 to October 31, 2017 
 $
 
 $69,640
November 1, 2017 to November 30, 2017 247
 $56.74
 
 $69,640
December 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 181,714
 $58.27
 180,270
 $59,137
Total 181,961
 $58.26
 180,270
  
(1)
Includes (i) shares that were acquired from employees in connection with the settlement of income tax and related benefit withholding obligations arising from vesting in restricted stock awards; and (ii) the repurchase of shares under the repurchase program authorized by the Board on November 2, 2017. For more information on theseThere were no repurchases see Note 11, Stockholders’ Equity, to our consolidated financial statements.
(2)On October 26, 2016, our Board authorized a new repurchase program, under which the Company may repurchase up to $100.0 million in aggregate value of the Company’s Common Stock during the twelve-month period following October 26, 2016. Through October 26, 2017, a total of 770,808 shares were purchased through this plan for $30.4 million, excluding commission payments.

On November 2, 2017, our Board approved the extension of the Company’s prior stock repurchase program, authorizing the Company to engage in a repurchase program to repurchase up to $69.6 million (the amount remaining from the $100.0 million repurchase amount authorized in 2016) in aggregate value of our Common Stock throughby or on behalf of the Company or any affiliated purchaser during the three months ended December 31, 2018. Purchases under the repurchase program may be made from time-to-time through a combination of open market repurchases (including Rule 10b5-1 plans), privately negotiated transactions, and accelerated share repurchase transactions, at the discretion of the Company’s officers, and as permitted by securities laws, covenants under existing bank agreements, and other legal requirements. As of December 31, 2017, a total of 180,270 shares were purchased through the extended plan approved on November 2, 2017, for $10.5 million, excluding commission payments. For additional information, see Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and capital resources”.2023.




Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides certain information as of December 31, 2017 with respect to our equity based compensation plans.

55
Plan category 
(a)
Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
 
Weighted-
average
exercise price
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
 
(b)
Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1) 606,695
 $48.70
 1,938,666
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 
 
 
Total 606,695
 48.70
 1,938,666



(1)The number of shares shown in column (b) represents the number of shares available for issuance pursuant to stock options and other stock-based awards that could be granted in the future under the Company’s 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2006 Plan”).



Item 6.Selected Financial Data. 
We have derived the following selected financial data from the consolidated financial statements and related notes. The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of future results. This information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, all of which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Significant transactions which occurred during the periods presented include the acquisition of Ingeus effective May 30, 2014, which primarily comprises our WD Services segment, the investment in Mission Providence, a joint venture in Australia, which commenced operations in 2014 but was sold on September 29, 2017, and our equity interest in Matrix effective October 19, 2016. Matrix, which was originally acquired on October 23, 2014, comprised our HA Services segment through October 19, 2016. The operations of HA Services and Human Services, which was sold effective November 1, 2015, have been presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented.


6.    [Reserved]
56
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
 (1)(2)(3)(4)(8)(9) (3)(5)(6)(8)(9) (7)(8)(9)(11) (8)(10)(11)  
 (dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Statement of operations data:         
Service revenue, net$1,623,882
 $1,578,245
 $1,478,010
 $1,092,880
 $798,766
          
Operating expenses:         
   Service expense1,489,044
 1,452,110
 1,381,154
 988,600
 736,669
   General and administrative expense72,336
 69,911
 70,986
 44,080
 25,590
   Asset impairment charge
 21,003
 
 
 
   Depreciation and amortization26,469
 26,604
 23,998
 17,213
 9,331
Total operating expenses1,587,849
 1,569,628
 1,476,138
 1,049,893
 771,590
Operating income36,033
 8,617
 1,872
 42,987
 27,176
Non-operating expense:         
   Interest expense, net1,278
 1,583
 1,853
 10,224
 6,921
   Other income(5,363) 
 
 
 
   Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
 
 
 525
   Equity in net (gain) loss of investees(12,054) 10,287
 10,970
 
 
   Gain on sale of investment(12,377) 
 
 
 
   Loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions345
 (1,375) (857) (37) 
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes64,204
 (1,878) (10,094) 32,800
 19,730
Provision for income taxes4,401
 17,036
 14,583
 8,289
 6,625
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax59,803
 (18,914) (24,677) 24,511
 13,105
Discontinued operations, net of tax(5,983) 108,760
 107,871
 (4,236) 6,333
Net income53,820
 89,846
 83,194
 20,275
 19,438
Net (gain) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests(451) 2,082
 502
 
 
Net income attributable to Providence$53,369
 $91,928
 $83,696
 $20,275
 $19,438
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:         
Continuing operations$3.50
 $(1.45) $(1.83) $1.63
 $0.95
Discontinued operations(0.44) 6.52
 6.09
 (0.28) 0.46
Total$3.06
 $5.07
 $4.26
 $1.35
 $1.41
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:        
Diluted13,673
 14,667
 15,961
 15,019
 13,810




 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
 (9) (5)(6)      
 (dollars in thousands)
Balance sheet data:         
Cash and cash equivalents$95,310
 $72,262
 $79,756
 $121,538
 $75,156
Total assets704,090
 685,279
 1,050,202
 1,168,934
 425,954
Long-term obligations, including current
portion
2,984
 3,611
 300,071
 574,613
 123,500
Other liabilities287,543
 306,428
 382,423
 372,907
 151,817
Convertible preferred stock77,546
 77,565
 77,576
 
 
Total stockholders' equity336,017
 297,675
 290,132
 221,414
 150,637


(1)
Other income for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes the receipt of the Haverhill Litigation settlement of $5.4 million, see Item 3. Legal Proceedings for further information on the settlement.

(2)Gain on sale of equity investment of $12.4 million relates to the sale of the Company’s equity interest in Mission Providence in 2017. The investment in Mission Providence was part of the WD Services segment.

(3)Discontinued operations, net of tax, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 include losses of $6.0 million and $5.6 million, respectively, related to potential indemnification claims for our historical Human Services segment.

(4)The year ended December 31, 2017 includes a net tax benefit of $16.0 million related to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act during the fourth quarter of 2017 due to the re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities by Providence as a result of the reduction in the U.S. corporate tax rate. Providence realized a benefit of $19.4 million, partially offset by $3.4 million of increased tax expense resulting from additional equity in net gain of Matrix, due to Matrix's re-measurement of its deferred tax liabilities. In addition, the tax provision was adversely impacted by tax expense of $3.6 million related to the Company’s 2015 Holding Company LTI Program (the “HoldCo LTIP”), for which expense was incurred for financial reporting purposes, but no shares were issued due to the market condition of the award not being satisfied and thus no tax deduction was realized.

(5)On October 19, 2016, we completed the Matrix Transaction. Included in discontinued operations, net of tax, for 2016 is a gain on the transaction, net of tax, totaling $109.4 million. In conjunction with the completion of this transaction, we fully repaid the amounts outstanding on our term loans and Credit Facility in 2016.

(6)During the fourth quarter of 2016, WD Services recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of $10.0 million, $4.4 million and $5.2 million to its property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill, respectively, primarily due to lower than expected volumes and unfavorable service mix shifts under a large contract in the UK impacting future projections; additional clarity into the anticipated size and structure of the Work and Health Programme in the UK; and the absence of additional details regarding the restructuring of the offender rehabilitation contract in the UK.

(7)On November 1, 2015, we completed the sale of our Human Services segment. Included in discontinued operations, net of tax, for 2015 is a gain on the sale of the Human Services segment, net of tax, totaling $100.3 million.

(8)The Company incurred $20.9 million of accelerated expense in 2015 related to restricted shares and cash placed into escrow at the time of the Ingeus acquisition. The shares and cash were placed into escrow concurrent with the payments of the acquisition consideration paid in 2014 for Ingeus; however, because two sellers of Ingeus remained employees post acquisition, the value of the shares and cash was recognized as compensation expense over the escrow term. Acceleration was triggered in 2015 when the two sellers separated from the Company. In addition, in 2015 and 2014, respectively, the Company incurred $5.9 million and $4.5 million of expense related to the separation of these two employees. Benefits of $2.0 million, $2.5 million and $16.1 million associated with the favorable resolution of acquisition contingencies and reductions in the fair value of Ingeus contingent consideration are included in general and administrative expenses for 2017, 2015 and 2014, respectively. 2017, 2016 and 2015 expenses also include $2.6 million, $8.5 million and $12.2 million, respectively, of WD Services’ redundancy costs.



(9)Equity in net (gain) loss of investees primarily relates to our investment in Mission Providence during 2015, 2016 and 2017 and Matrix for the period of October 19, 2016 through December 31, 2017. Matrix became an equity investment upon the completion of the Matrix Transaction. For Mission Providence, we recorded net loss in investee of $1.4 million, $8.5 million and $11.0 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For Matrix, we recorded $13.4 million in equity in net gain of investee and $1.8 million in equity in net loss of investee related to our equity method investment in Matrix in 2017 and for the period of October 19, 2016 through December 31, 2016, respectively. The equity in net gain from Matrix for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes a benefit of $13.6 million related to the re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities arising from a lower U.S. corporate tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Act. As a result of the increased equity income, Providence incurred higher tax expense of $3.4 million, which is reflected as a component of “Provision for income taxes” in the table above. The investment in Matrix at December 31, 2017 of $169.7 million is included in “Equity investments” in our consolidated balance sheet.

(10)2014 includes $4.5 million of financing fees that were deferred and fully expensed within interest expense in the fourth quarter of 2014 in relation to bridge financing commitments and $3.0 million of third-party financing fees that are included in general and administrative expense.

(11)2015 includes $2.4 million in Ingeus transaction-related expenses and 2014 includes $11.8 million in acquisition costs primarily related to the acquisitions of Ingeus and Matrix.




Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with Item 6.“Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this report.Annual Rport. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected inanyforward-looking statements, as discussed in “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”. These risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to those set forth in Item 1A. “Risk Factors”.
 
Overview of Our Business
 
Please refer to Item 1. “Business” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our services and corporate strategy.


Providence owns subsidiaries and investments primarily engaged inModivCare Inc. ("ModivCare" or the provision of"Company") is a technology-enabled healthcare services incompany that provides a suite of integrated supportive care solutions for public and private payors and their members. Its value-based solutions address the United Statessocial determinants of health ("SDoH") by connecting members to essential care services. By doing so, ModivCare helps health plans manage risks, reduce costs, and workforce development services internationally. The subsidiaries and other investments in which we hold interests comprise the following segments:

NET Services – Nationwide managerimprove health outcomes. ModivCare is a provider of non-emergency medical transportation programs for state governments("NEMT"), personal care services ("PCS"), and managedremote patient monitoring solutions ("RPM"), which serve similar, highly vulnerable patient populations. The technology-enabled operating model in its NEMT segment includes the coordination of non-emergency medical transportation services supported by an infrastructure of core competencies in risk underwriting, contact center management, network credentialing and claims management. Additionally, its personal care organizations.services in its PCS segment include placements of non-medical personal care assistants, home health aides and nurses primarily to Medicaid patient populations in need of care monitoring and assistance performing daily living activities in the home setting. ModivCare’s remote patient monitoring solutions in its RPM segment include the monitoring of personal emergency response systems, vitals monitoring, medication management and data-driven patient engagement solutions.
WD Services – Global provider of employment preparation and placement services, legal offender rehabilitation services, youth community service programs and certain health related services to eligible participants of government sponsored programs.
Matrix Investment – MinorityModivCare also holds a 43.6% minority interest in CCHN Group Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which operates under the Matrix a nationwide provider of in-home care optimization and management solutions, including CHAs, to members of managed care organizations, accounted for as an equity method investment. On February 16, 2018,Medical Network brand (“Matrix”). Matrix, acquired HealthFair, expanding its service offerings to include mobile health assessments, advanced diagnostic testing, and additional care optimization services.

In addition to its segments’ operations, thewhich is included in our Corporate and Other segment, includes the Company’s activities at its corporate office that include executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal, public reporting, certain strategicmaintains a national network of community-based clinicians who deliver in-home and corporate development functions and the results of the Company’s captive insurance company. We are actively monitoring these activities as they relate to our capital allocation and acquisition strategy to ensure alignment with Providence’s overall strategic objectives and its goal of enhancing shareholder value.on-site services.

Business Outlook and Trends
 
Our performance is affected by a number of trends that drive the demand for our services. In particular, the markets in which we operate are exposed to various trends, such as healthcare industry and demographic dynamics in the U.S. and international government outsourcing and employment dynamics. Over the long term, we believe there are numerous factors that could affect growth within the industries in which we operate, including:

an aging population, which willis expected to increase demand for healthcare services including required transportation to such healthcare services and in-home personal care and remote patient monitoring services;
increasing prevalence of chronic illnesses that require active and ongoing monitoring of health data which can be accomplished at a lower cost and result in better health outcomes through remote patient monitoring services;
a movement towards value-based care versus fee for servicefee-for-service and cost plus care and budget pressure on governments, both of which may increase the use of private corporations to provide necessary and innovative services;
increasing demand for in-home care provision, driven by cost pressures on traditional reimbursement models and technological advances enabling remote engagement;engagement, including remote monitoring and similar internet-based health related services;
a shift in membership dynamics as a result of Medicaid redetermination efforts, which may decrease membership levels at our NEMT segment;
advancement of regulatory priorities, which include the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") proposed rule, Ensuring Access to Medicaid Services, which may lower profit margins at our PCS segment;
technological advancements, which may be utilized by us to improve serviceservices and lower costs, but may also be utilized by others, which may increase industry competitiveness;
changes in UK government policy drivenMCO, Medicaid and Medicare plans increasing coverage of non-emergency medical transportation services for a variety of reasons, including increased access to care, improved patient compliance with treatment plans, social trends, and to promote SDoH, and this trend may be accelerated or reinforced by opposition to the government’s outsourcingThe Consolidated Appropriations Act of the services provided by WD Services to private companies,2021 ("H.R.133"), a component of which opposition may increase in light of recent events in the UK, including the liquidation of the UK government contractor Carillion plc;
the results of the referendum on the UK’s exit from the European Union and related political and economic uncertainty in the UK; and
proposals by the President of the United States and Congress to change the Medicaid program, including considering converting the Medicaid program to a block grant format or capping the federal contribution tomandates that state Medicaid programs ensure that Medicaid beneficiaries have necessary transportation to and from health care providers; and

uncertain macroeconomic conditions, including rising inflation and interest rates, could have an effect on our debt and short-term borrowings, which may have a negative impact on our results.

57



On May 11, 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") declared the end of the public health emergency ("PHE") for the COVID-19 pandemic. While the Company has continued to experience increased trip volume, service hours, and patient visits each year following the pandemic, structural changes in the industry as a fixed amount per beneficiary, and CMS’ grantresult of waivers to states relativethe pandemic, as well as ongoing constraints on the labor market, specifically related to the parameters of their Medicaid programs. Enactment ofstrain on healthcare professionals, could continue to have an adverse legislation, regulation or agency guidance,impact on the Company's financial statements. For the NEMT segment, trip volume may reducehave a negative impact on our transportation providers and may result in higher transportation costs as the Company adapts to this increase in demand for transportation services and to the availability of transportation providers, should any capacity constraints within our services, ournetwork of transportation providers arise. For the PCS segment, the shortage of caregivers will continue to impact the volume of service hours that can be provided while also driving increased wage rates, which limits the Company's ability to conduct some or allbe profitable in contracts with set rates for various care services. Additionally, changes in membership dynamics at the NEMT segment as a result of our business and/orMedicaid redetermination and reduction in payor reimbursement rates for services performed within our segments.

Historically, our segments have grown through organic expansion into new markets and service lines, organic expansion within existing markets and service lines, increases inat the number of members served under contracts we have been awarded, the securing of new contracts, and acquisitions. With respect to acquisitions, we are actively evaluating the optimal industry sectors, such as the non-emergency medical transportation industry and others in which businesses complementary to our NET Services business operate, around which to focus our merger and acquisition activity. This ongoing evaluation takes into consideration and balances a number of factors, including the strategic goals, competitive landscape, and growth opportunities of our current segments,PCS segment in an attempt to directcontain costs could limit the ability for the Company to generate revenue despite the Company's shift toward emphasizing the importance of value-based care. Any of these circumstances and factors could have a material adverse effect on our capital towards those areas most likelyreputation and business and any long-term macroeconomic impacts that have arisen as a result of the pandemic could continue to drive long-term value creationchange trends in the market.

Our business environment is competitive, the structural changes in our industry related to the COVID-19 pandemic have been lasting, the labor market for healthcare professionals remains constrained, and generate the highest levels of returnmarket price for our shareholders. Incommon stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market continues to be volatile; the continuing effect of all or any of the foregoing could result in an impairment of the goodwill in our reporting units. As discussed elsewhere herein and under the caption “Risk Factors” in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2022, impairment tests may be required in addition to the annual impairment testing as evidenced byof July 1, 2023, if circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the 2016 Matrix Transaction, we may also enter into strategic partnerships if we feel this provides the best opportunity to maximize shareholderfair value of goodwill of a reporting unit below such reporting unit’s carrying value. The pursuit of our strategy may also result inCompany monitors the disposition of current businesses, as demonstrated in 2017 with our sale of our equity investment in Mission Providence and in 2015 with the sale of our Human Services segment. In making these determinations, we base our decisions on a variety of factors, including the availability of alternative opportunities to deploy capital, maximize shareholder value or other strategic considerations. The outcome of our active evaluationperformance of the optimal industry sectors around whichbusiness and the value of its stock price and estimated fair values of its reporting units, among other relevant considerations, to focusdetermine if any impairments to goodwill could exist at any particular time. During our merger and acquisition activity as well as the potential future entry into strategic partnerships or potential dispositionJuly 1, 2023 annual assessment of businesses may impact the extent and manner in whichgoodwill, we deploy resources across Providence, including strategic and administrative resources between Corporate and Other anddetermined that based on our operating segments, and we may incur incremental costs in pursuing these efforts.

Revenues and Expenses
NET Services
NET Services primarily contracts with state Medicaid agencies and managed care organizations for the coordination of their members’ non-emergency transportation needs. Most contracts are capitated, which means we are paid on a per-member, per-month basisqualitative assessment for each eligible member. For most contracts, we arrangereporting unit, factors existed which required us to test our goodwill for transportation of members through our network of independent transportation providers, whereby we negotiate rates and remit payment to the transportation providers. However, for certain contracts, we assume no risk for the transportation network, credentialing and/or payments to these providers. For these contracts, we only provide administrative management services to support the customers efforts to serve its clients.
WD Services
WD Services primarily provides workforce development and offender rehabilitation services on a global basis that include employment preparation and placement, legal offender rehabilitation services, youth community service programs and certain health related services to eligible participants of government sponsored programs. Populations served by WD Services are broad and include the disabled, recently and long-term unemployed and individuals seeking new skills, as well as individuals that are coping with medical illnesses, are newly graduated from educational institutions, or are being released from incarceration. We contract primarily with national and regional government entities that seek to reduce the unemployment and recidivism rates.
The revenue earned by WD Services under its contracts is often derived through a combination of different revenue channels including, but not limited to, fees contingent upon: (1) the volume of WD end-users referred to or admitted into a specific program, (2) the achievement of defined outcomes for specific individuals, such as a job placement or continued employment, and (3) the achievement of defined outcomes for a population of individuals over a specific time period, such as aggregate employment or recidivism rates. The relative contributions of different revenue channels under a specific contract can fluctuate meaningfully over the life of a contract and thus contribute to significant earnings volatility. Revenue recognition related to our NCS youth programs can be particularly volatile due to the timing of services provided, which typically occur in the second and third quarters of each year. WD Services also earns revenue under fixed FFS arrangements, based upon contractual rates established at the outset of the applicable contract year, although the rate may be prospectively adjusted during the contract year based upon actual volumes. Volume levels are typically not guaranteed under contracts.   We bill according to contractual terms, typically after proof of services have been demonstrated, although certain contracts allow for ratable billings based upon expected levels of services, and require reconciliation at the conclusion of the contract year.
As described above, when WD Services enters into new markets and service lines, it often experiences significant costs, which are expensed as incurred, whereas revenue may not be realized until a later date.impairment. As a result WD Services experiences significant variability in its financial results and we therefore believe the results of WD Services are best viewed over a multi-year period.


Classification of Operating Expenses
Our “Service expense” line item includes the majority of the operating expenses of NET Services and WD Services as well as our captive insurance company, with the exception of certain costs which are classified as “General and administrative expense”. Service expense also excludes asset impairment charges and depreciation and amortization expenses. In the discussion below, we present the breakdown of service expense by the following major categories: purchased services, payroll and related costs, other operating expenses and stock-based compensation. Purchased services includes the amounts we pay to third-party service providers and are typically dependent upon service volume. Payroll and related costs include all personnel costs of our segments. Other operating expenses include general overhead costs, excluding facilitiesquantitative assessment, we determined that the goodwill at our PCS and related charges, of our segments. Stock-based compensation represents the stock-based compensation expense associated with stock grants to employees of our segments as well as the expense related to restricted stock placed into escrow at the time of the Ingeus acquisition.RPM reporting units was impaired. See Note 7, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, for additional details.


Our “General and administrative expense” primarily includes the operating expenses of our corporate office, excluding depreciation and amortization, as well as facilities and related charges of our segments and contingent consideration and acquisition related adjustments, as applicable.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that we believe are important in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements because they require that we use judgment and estimates in applying those policies. We prepare our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in accordance with GAAP.accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparation of the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements as well as revenue and expenses during the periods reported. We base our estimates on historical experience, where applicable, and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from our estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
 
There are certain critical estimates that we believe require significant judgment in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if:


it requires us to make an assumption because information was not available at the time or it included matters that were highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made; and

changes in the estimate or different estimates that could have been selected may have had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
 
For more information on each of these policies, see Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements, to our consolidated financial statements. We discuss information about the nature and rationale for our critical accounting estimates below.Accrued Transportation Costs
 
Transportation Accrual
Description.We accrue the cost ofgenerally pay our transportation expense within NET Servicesproviders for completed trips based on documentation submitted after services have been provided. The transportation service is initiated at the time a member submits a request for transportation services from our providers. At this time, we calculate an estimated transportation cost for each trip based on historical experience and contractual terms. This portion of the accrued transportation cost is based on requests for services we have received and the amount we expect to be billed by our transportation providers, as we generally only pay transportation providers forproviders. All completed trips based upon documentation submitted after services(both unbilled and billed) for which we have been provided. not yet issued payment reconcile to our total accrued transportation cost, however the critical accounting estimate that requires significant judgment is the portion of the accrual that is estimated at initiation of the member request.
58



Judgments and Uncertainties. The transportation cost accrual requires significant judgment as the accrualit is based uponcalculated using contractual rates and mileage estimates, as well as an estimated rate for unknown cancellations asgiven that members may have requested transportation but not notified uswithout yet notifying the Company of cancellation. Based upon historical trip experience and contractcontractual terms, we estimate the amount of expensetransportation cost incurred for invoices which have not yet been submitted as of period end.submitted. The estimates are routinely monitored and compared to actual invoiced costs. Actual expensecost could be greater or less than the amounts estimated due to changes in member orfacts and circumstances that differ from historical trends.

Sensitivity of Estimate to Change. The estimates for the transportation provider behavior.
Business Combinations
We assignaccrual are developed using assumptions based on the value of the consideration transferred to acquire a businessbest information available to the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their fair valuesCompany at the date of acquisition. Any excess purchase price paid over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired is allocated to goodwill. When determining the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, management makes significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Critical estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include but are not limited to future expected cash flows from customer relationships and trade names, and discount rates. Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable,time, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. Asunpredictable and as a result, actual results may differ significantly from estimates.


In determining our estimate each period, we use data around historical trip experience, current contractual rates, and mileage estimates and use a third party consultant to assist in development of the accrual. Our December 31, 2023 estimated portion of the accrued transportation costs was $1.9 million lower than our estimated portion at December 31, 2022. The decrease from 2022 to 2023 is driven by faster adjudication of claims as a result of initiatives, such as digitization of claims and increased utilization of ride share. The assumptions used in the estimate inputs include estimated trip costs and estimated trip volume. If we were to assume that our estimate of future transportation costs was changed to the upper end or lower end of the range we developed in the course of formulating our estimate, the estimate for future transportation costs as of December 31, 2023 would range from $35.6 million to $43.5 million.
 
Recoverability of Goodwill and Definite-Lived Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill.Description. In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, we review goodwill for impairment annually, orand more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that an assetthe value may be impaired. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) the loss or modification of significant contracts, (2) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (3) unanticipated competition, (4) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, or (5) a significant decline in the Company’sour stock price. We perform theour annual goodwill impairment test for all reporting units as of OctoberJuly 1.

First, we Goodwill is allocated across the Company's reporting units: NEMT, PCS, and RPM. We first perform qualitative assessments for each reporting unit to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the qualitative assessment suggests that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value amount, we then perform a quantitative assessment and compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value.

We adopted ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):Simplifying If the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”) effective April 1, 2017. ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to compare the implied faircarrying value of goodwill with its carrying amount as part of step two of the goodwill impairment test. Instead, if we deem it necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test in an annual or interim period, we recognize an impairment charge equal to the excess, if any, of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value, notis determined to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.
Long-Lived Assets Including Intangibles. In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, we review the carryingestimated fair value, of long-lived assets or groups of assets to be used in operations whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may be impaired. Factors that may necessitate an impairment assessment include, among others, significant adverse changes in the extent or manner in which an asset or group of assets is used, significant adverse changes in legal factors or the business climate that could affect the value of an asset or group of assets or significant declines in the observable market value of an asset or group of assets. The presence or occurrence of those events indicates that an asset or group of assets may be impaired. In those cases, we assess the recoverability of an asset or group of assets by determining whether the carrying value of the asset or group of assets exceeds the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows expectedis considered impaired.

Judgments and Uncertainties. When performing a quantitative assessment to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets over the remaining economic life of the asset or the primary asset in the group of assets. If such testing indicates the carrying value of the asset or group of assets is not recoverable, we estimate the fair value of the asset or groupCompany's goodwill, the Company applies a blended approach, which includes a combination of assets using appropriateboth an income approach and a market valuation methodologies, which would typically include an estimate ofapproach. The income approach applies a discounted cash flows. Ifflow method which includes assumptions on the projected future cash flows, discount rates, working capital adjustments, long-term growth rates, and others to estimate the fair value of those assets or groups of assets is less than carryingthe reporting unit. The market valuation approach produces an estimated fair value we record an impairment loss equal to the excess of the carrying value overreporting unit based on a comparison of the estimated fair value.reporting unit to publicly traded entities in similar lines of business.

Sensitivity of Estimate to Change. The use of different estimates or assumptions in determining the fair value of our goodwill and intangible assets may result in a different values for those assets,value recorded, which could result in an impairment or,charge that has the potential to have a material impact to the consolidated statement of operations. During our July 1 annual assessment of goodwill, we determined that based on our qualitative assessment for each reporting unit, factors existed which required us to test our goodwill for impairment. These factors included a decline in the period in which an impairment is recognized, could result in a materially different impairment charge.
During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company reviewed WD Services for impairment, as there were several negative factors impacting the segment, primarily due to lower than expected volumes and unfavorable service mix shifts under a large contract in the UK impacting future projections; additional clarity into the anticipated size and structuremarket price of the WorkCompany's common stock, industry specific regulatory pressures such as Medicaid redetermination and Health Programme in the UK; the absence of additional details regarding the restructuring of the offender rehabilitation contract in the UK;Centers for Medicare and a change in senior management at WDMedicaid Services during the fourth quarter.("CMS") proposed ruling on Ensuring Access to Medicaid Services, and general economic and market volatility. As a result of our quantitative assessment, we determined that the Company performed a quantitative test comparing the fair value of the asset groupings comprising WD Services with their carrying amountsgoodwill at our PCS and recorded an asset impairment charge of $10.0 million to property and equipment and $4.4 million to definite-lived customer relationship intangible assets, which is recordedRPM reporting units was impaired resulting in “Asset impairment charge” on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. In addition, the Company reviewed the carrying value of goodwill of WD Services, noting the carrying value exceeded the fair value. Therefore, the Company performed the second step of the impairment test, in which the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities, on a fair value basis, with any excess representing the implied value of goodwill of the reporting unit. The fair value was determined using an income approach, which estimates the present value of future cash flows based on management’s forecast of revenue growth rates and operating margins, working capital requirements and capital expenditures. Based on this analysis, the carrying value of goodwill of the WD Services reporting unit exceeded the implied fair value and the Company recorded an impairment charge of $5.2 million, which is included in “Asset impairment charge” on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. No impairment charges were incurred during the year ended December 31, 2017.second quarter of 2023 of $137.3 million and $45.8 million, respectively.





Income Taxes
 
Description. We recordaccount for income taxes under the asset and liability method. DeferredUnder this method, we record income tax expense for the amount of taxes payable or refundable in the current period and deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect our estimation of the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for book and tax purposes. We determine deferred income taxes based on the differences in accounting methods and timing between financial statementreporting purposes and income tax reporting. Accordingly, wereporting purposes. We determine the deferred tax asset or liability for each temporary difference based on the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when we realize the underlying items of income and expense. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets when we estimate that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, and we record liabilities to address uncertain tax positions we have taken in previously filed tax returns or that we expect to take in our current tax returns.
59



Judgments and Uncertainties. Significant assumptions, judgments, and estimates are made by management when determining the income tax provision (benefit) for the current year, the amount of deferred tax assets and liabilities to be recorded, and the necessary valuation allowance to be recorded. These judgements include interpretations of income tax regulations, estimates of future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and the likelihood of recovery of deferred tax assets or that a tax position will be sustained upon audit.

We consider many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of our deferred tax assets, including our recent earnings experience by jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income, and the carryforward periods available to us for tax reporting purposes, as well as other relevant factors.purposes. We may establish a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount we believe is more likely than not to be realized. Due to inherent complexities arising from the nature of our businesses, future changes in income tax law, tax sharing agreements or variances between our actual and anticipated operating results, we make certain judgments and estimates. Therefore, actual income taxes could materially vary from these estimates.

We record liabilities to address uncertain tax positions we have taken in previously filed tax returns or that we expect to take in a futureour current tax return.returns. The determination for required liabilities is based upon an analysis of each individual tax position, taking into consideration whether it is more likely than not that our tax position, based on technical merits, will be sustained upon examination. For those positions for which we conclude it is more likely than not itthe position will be sustained, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 5050.0 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. The difference between the amount recognized and the total tax position is recorded as a liability. TheWhile the Company believes all of its tax positions are fully supportable, the ultimate resolution of these tax positions may be greater or less than the liabilities recorded.


On December 22, 2017,Sensitivity of Estimate to Change. If there are any changes in the Tax Reform Act was enacted, which significantly changes U.S. tax law by, among other things, lowering corporateunderlying estimates and assumptions to calculate the current period income tax rates, implementing a territorial tax system and imposing a repatriation tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The Tax Reform Act permanently reduces the U.S. corporate income tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% rate, effective January 1, 2018. The Tax Reform Act also provides for a one-time deemed repatriation of post-1986 undistributed foreign subsidiary earnings and profits through the year ended December 31, 2017.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) to address the application of GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared,provision or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Reform Act. We have recognized the provisional tax impacts related to deemed repatriated earnings and the benefit for the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and included these amountsor if the settlement of tax issues from a current period audit results in our consolidateda tax position that is no longer supported, the financial statements could be materially impacted. During the period ended December 31, 2023, the Company recorded $1.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, in other long-term liabilities.

Components of Results of Operations
The following results of operations include the accounts of ModivCare and our subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. For our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017. The final impact may differ from these provisional amounts, possibly materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations2021 see “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and assumptions we made, additional regulatory guidance that may be issued,Analysis of Financial Condition and actions we may take as a resultResults of the Tax Reform Act. In accordance with SAB 118, the financial reporting impact of the Tax Reform Act will be completed no later than the fourth quarter of 2018.
Reinsurance and Self-Insurance Liabilities
We historically reinsured a substantial portionOperations” of our automobile, general and professional liability and workers’ compensation costs under reinsurance programs through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Social Services Providers Captive Insurance Company (“SPCIC”), a licensed captive insurance company domiciled inForm 10-K for the State of Arizona. In conjunctionfiscal year ended December 31, 2022, filed with the policy renewalsSEC on May 16, 2017, SPCIC did not renewMarch 7, 2023.

Revenues

Service revenue, net. Service revenue for our NEMT segment includes the expiring policies. However, SPCIC continuesrevenue generated by providing non-emergency medical transportation services directly to resolve claims under the historical policy years. In addition, under the current policies, the Company retains liability up to the policy deductibles. In addition,our customers. These services are provided on either a capitated basis, which means we maintain self-funded health insurance programsare paid on a per-member, per-month ("PMPM") basis for U.S. based employees witheach eligible member, or on a stop-loss umbrella policy with a third party insurer to limit the maximum potential liability for individual claims and for a maximum potential claim liabilityfee-for-service ("FFS") basis, which means we are paid based on member enrollment. We utilize independent actuarial reports to determine the expected lossesvolume of trips or services performed. Payment for our NEMT services is received from third-party payors, predominately made up of state Medicaid agencies and in order to record the appropriate entries associated with our historical reinsurance programs, our retained exposure for the deductibles under our current policies, and self-funded health insurance programs. We regularly analyze our reserves for incurred but not reported claims, and for reported but not paid claims related to our reinsurance and self-funded insurance programs. We believe our reserves are adequate. However, significant judgment is involved in assessing these reserves such as evaluating historical paid claims, average lag times between the claims’ incurred date, reported dates and paid dates, and the frequency and severity of claims. There may be differences between actual settlement amounts and recorded reserves and any resulting adjustments are recorded once a probable amount is known.MCOs.






Revenue Recognition
NET Services
Capitatedcontracts. The majority of NET Services revenue is generated underOur capitated contracts with customers whereoperate under either a full-risk or a shared-risk structure. Under full-risk contracts, payors pay a fixed amount per eligible member per month and we assume the responsibility of meeting the covered healthcare related transportation requirements of a specific geographic population based on per-member per-month fees for the number of eligible members in the customer’spayor's program. Under this structure, we assume the full-risk for the costs associated with arranging transportation of members through our network of independent transportation providers. Revenue is recognized based on the populationnumber of members served during the period. In some capitatedunder shared-risk contracts, partial payment is received as a prepayment during the month service is provided.we have provisions for reconciliations, risk corridors, and/or profit rebates. These partial paymentscontracts allow for periodic reconciliations based on actual cost and or/trip volume and may be due backresult in refunds to the customer,payor (contract payables), or additional payments may be due tofrom the Company, after each reconciliation period,payor (contract receivables) based on a reconciliation of actual utilization and cost comparedthe provisions contractually agreed upon. These shared-risk contracts also allow for margin stabilization, as generally the amount received PMPM is adjusted for the costs to the prepayment made.
FFS contracts.  Revenues earned under FFS contracts are based upon contractually established billing rates. Revenues are recognized when the service is provided based upon contractual amounts.
Flat fee contracts. Revenues earned under flat fee contracts are recognized ratably over the covered service period based upon contractually established rates which do not fluctuate with any changes in the membership population who are eligible to receiveprovide the transportation services.
For most contracts, Under both contract structures, we arrange for transportation of members through our network of independent transportation providers, whereby we negotiate rates and remit payment to the transportation providers; however,providers. However, for certain contracts, we assume no risk for the transportation network, credentialing and/or payments to these providers. For these contracts, we only provide administrative management services to support the customerscustomers’ efforts to serve itstheir clients. The amount of revenue recognized is based upon the management fee earned.


WDServices
60


WD Services revenues are primarily generated from providing workforce development and offender rehabilitation services which include employment preparation and placement, apprenticeship and training, and certain health related services to clients on behalf of governmental and private entities. While the specific terms vary by contract and country, we primarily receive four types of revenue streams underUnder FFS contracts, with government entities: referral/attachment fees, job placement and job outcome fees, sustainment fees and incentive fees. Referral/attachment fees are typically upfront payments that are payable when a client is referred by the contracting government entity or that client enters the program. Job placement fees are typically payable when a client is employed. Job outcome fees are typically payable when a client attains and holds employment forpayors pay a specified minimum period of time. Sustainment fees are typically payable when clients maintain a job outcome past specified employment tenure milestones. Incentive fees are generallyamount for each service that we provide based upon a calculation that includes a variety of factors and inputs, such as average sustainment rates and client referral rates. Incentive fees vary greatly by contract.
Referral/attachment feeon costs incurred plus an agreed-upon margin. FFS revenue is recognized ratably overin the period of service, based upon an estimated period of time general services will be provided (i.e., the person is placed in a job or reaches the maximum time period for the program). The estimated period of time for which services will be rendered is based upon historical data. Job placement, job outcome and sustainment fee revenue is recognized when certain milestones are achieved, and amounts become billable. Incentive fee revenue is generally recognized when fixed and determinable, frequently at the end of the cumulative calculation period, unless contractual terms allow for earned payments on a fixed or ratable basis.
Revenue is also earned under fixed FFS arrangements, based upon contractual rates established at the outset of the contract or the applicable contract year, although the rate may be prospectively adjusted during the contract year based upon actual volumes. 

If the rate is adjusted but the Company is unable to adjust its costs accordingly, or if the volume or types of referrals are lower than estimated, our profitability may be negatively impacted. Volume levels are typically not guaranteed under contracts.

Deferred Revenue
At times we may receive funding for certain services in advance of services being rendered. These amounts are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets as “Deferred revenue” until the services are rendered.rendered and is reduced by the estimated impact of contractual allowances.

Stock Based Compensation
Our primary forms of employee stock-based compensation are stock option awards and restricted stock awards, including certain awards which vestService revenue for our PCS segment includes the revenue generated based upon performance conditions. We measure the value of stock option awards on the date of grant at fair value using the appropriate valuation techniques, including the Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo option-pricing models. We


recognize the fair value as stock-based compensation expensehours incurred by our in-home caregivers to provide services to our customers, primarily on a straight-lineFFS basis overin which we earn a specified amount for each service that we provide. Payment for our PCS services is billed to third-party payors which include, but are not limited to, MCOs, hospitals, Medicaid agencies and programs and other home health care providers who subcontract the requisite service period,services of our caregivers to their patients, and individuals.

Service revenue for our RPM segment includes the sale of monitoring equipment to our third-party distributors as well as revenue generated from the hours incurred by our Clinical Team for providing monitoring services to our customers, primarily on a PMPM basis for each eligible member. Payment for our monitoring services is billed to third-party payors which include, but are not limited to, national and regional health plans, government-funded benefit programs, healthcare provider organizations, and individuals.

Grant Income

Grant income. The Company has received distributions, primarily under the CARES Act Provider Relief Fund ("PRF") and the ARPA Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Relief Fund ("SLFRF") targeted to providing economic relief and stimulus to combat health and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Operating Expenses

Service expense. Service expense for our NEMT segment includes purchased transportation, operational payroll and other operational related costs. Purchased transportation includes the amounts we pay to third-party transportation providers and is typically dependent upon service volume. Operational payroll predominately includes our contact center operations, customer advocacy and transportation network team. Other operating expenses primarily include operational overhead costs, and operating facilities and related charges. Service expense for our PCS segment includes payroll and other operational related costs for our caregivers to provide in-home care. Service expense for our RPM segment primarily consists of salaries of employees in our contact centers, connectivity costs and occupancy costs.

General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense for all segments consists principally of salaries for administrative employees that support the vesting period. The pricing models require various highly judgmental assumptionsoperations, occupancy costs, marketing expenditures, insurance, and professional fees.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation within this caption includes infrastructure items such as computer hardware and software, office equipment, monitoring and vitals equipment, buildings, and leasehold improvements. Amortization expense is generated primarily from amortization of our finite intangible assets, including volatilitypayor networks, trade names and expected option term. If anydeveloped technology.

Impairment of the assumptions used in the models change significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future fromgoodwill. Based on our qualitative goodwill assessment for each reporting unit, we determined that recorded in the current period.

qualitative factors existed which required us to test our goodwill for impairment. As a result of the adoptionimpairment evaluation, we determined that the goodwill within our PCS and RPM reporting units was impaired.

Other Expenses (Income)

Interest expense, net. Interest expense consists principally of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvementsinterest accrued during the period ended December 31, 2023 on the Company’s borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility and Senior Unsecured Notes, and amortization of deferred financing fees. Refer to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”), effective January 1, 2017, we no longer record stock-based compensation expensethe “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section below for further discussion of these borrowings.

Equity in net income (loss) of investee, net of estimated forfeiturestax. Equity in earnings of equity method investee consists of our proportionate share of equity earnings or losses from our Matrix equity investment held at our Corporate and Other segment, presented net of related taxes, as well as the earnings of our insurance captive held at our NEMT segment, presented net of taxes.

Income tax effects of awards are treated as discrete items in the period in which tax windfalls or shortfalls occur.(provision) benefit. The adoption also impacted the presentation of cash flows and the computation of earnings per share.

The adoption of ASU 2016-09 will subject our tax rate to quarterly volatility from the effects of stock award exercises and vesting activities, including the adverse impact on our income tax provision for awards which result in a tax deduction less than the amount recorded for financial reporting purposes based upon the fair value of the award at the grant date. See additional discussion included in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements, to our consolidated financial statements.
Restructuring, Redundancyand Related Reorganization Costs
We have engaged in employee headcount optimization actions within WD Services which require management to estimate the timing and amount of severance and other employee separation costs for workforce reduction. We accrue for severance and other employee separation costs under these actions when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount is reasonably estimable. The amounts used in determining severance accruals are based on an estimate of the salaries and related benefit costs payable under existing plans for the number of employees impacted, but the final determination of the actual employees to be terminatedCompany is subject to a customary consultation process. The estimate of costs that will ultimately be paid requires significant judgment and to the extent that actual results or updated results differ from our current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustmentfederal taxation in the period such amounts are determined.United States and state taxation in the various jurisdictions in which we operate.

61



Results of operationsSegment Reporting

Segment reporting. Our segments reflect the manner in which our operations are organized and reviewed by management along our segment lines. We operate in two principal business segments: NET Services and WD Services. Our investment in Matrix is also a reportable segment referred to as the “Matrix Investment”.management. Segment results are based on how our chief operating decision makerCODM manages our business, makes operating decisions and evaluates operating performance.

We operate four reportable business segments: NEMT, PCS, RPM, and Corporate and Other. Effective January 1, 2022, the Company completed its segment reorganization which resulted in the addition of a Corporate and Other segment that includes the costs associated with the Company's corporate operations. The operating results of the two principal business segmentsCorporate and Other segment include revenueactivities related to executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal and expenses incurred by thecertain strategic and corporate development functions for each segment, as well as an allocation of direct expenses incurred by our corporate division on behalf of the segment, which primarily relate to insurance and stock-based compensation allocations. Indirect expenses, including unallocated corporate functions and expenses, such as executive, finance, accounting, human resources, information technology and legal, as well as the results of our captive insurance company (the “Captive”) and elimination entries recorded in consolidation are reflected in “Corporate and Other”.
Discontinued operations. Effective October 19, 2016, we completed the Matrix Transaction resultinginvestment. Prior to the segment reorganization, we reported the investment in our ownershipMatrix as a separate operating segment. Based on the relative size of the Matrix investment and all related activity to the overall financial statements, however, the CODM no longer views it as a noncontrolling interestseparate operating segment but reviews results in our historical HA Services segment. The HA Services segmentconjunction with the other corporate results of operations for the periods through October 19, 2016 are separately discussed inbusiness.

The NEMT segment provides non-emergency medical transportation services throughout the “Discontinued operations, net of tax” section set forth below. For periods subsequentcountry. The PCS segment provides non-medical personal care and home health services. The RPM segment provides remote patient monitoring solutions. The Corporate and Other segment includes activities related to the transaction,Company's corporate operations as well as the results of an investment in innovation that the Matrix Investment are separately discussed inCompany completed during the “Equity in net lossfirst quarter of investees” section set forth below. Additionally, effective November 1, 2015, we completed the sale of our Human Services segment.2023. The Human Services segmentoperating results of the NEMT, PCS and RPM segments include revenue and expenses generated and incurred by the segment, and the Corporate and Other segment includes expenses incurred in relation to the Corporate operations are separatelyof the Company as well as certain revenue and expenses associated with the investment in innovation discussed above.

See Note 4, Segments, in the “Discontinued operations, net of tax” section set forth below.our accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information on our segments.
62






Year ended December 31, 20172023 compared to year ended December 31, 20162022

Consolidated results.The following table sets forth results of operations and the percentage of consolidated total revenuesservice revenue, net, represented by items in our consolidated statements of incomeoperations for 20172023 and 20162022 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 20232022
 Amount%
of Service Revenue
Amount%
of Service Revenue
Service revenue, net$2,751,170 100.0%$2,504,393 100.0%
Grant income5,037 0.2%7,351 0.3%
Operating expenses:    
Service expense2,304,218 83.8%2,032,074 81.1%
General and administrative expense304,564 11.1%322,171 12.9%
Depreciation and amortization104,271 3.8%100,415 4.0%
Impairment of goodwill183,100 6.7%— —%
Total operating expenses2,896,153 105.3%2,454,660 98.0%
Operating income (loss)(139,946)(5.1)%57,084 2.3%
Interest expense, net69,120 2.5%61,961 2.5%
Loss before income taxes and equity method investment(209,066)(7.6)%(4,877)(0.2)%
Income tax benefit4,319 0.2%3,035 0.1%
Equity in net income (loss) of investee, net of tax287 —%(29,964)(1.2)%
Net loss$(204,460)(7.4)%$(31,806)(1.3)%
 
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016
 $ 
Percentage
of Revenue
 $ 
Percentage
of Revenue
Service revenue, net1,623,882
 100.0 % 1,578,245
 100.0 %
        
Operating expenses:       
Service expense1,489,044
 91.7 % 1,452,110
 92.0 %
General and administrative expense72,336
 4.5 % 69,911
 4.4 %
Asset impairment charge
  % 21,003
 1.3 %
Depreciation and amortization26,469
 1.6 % 26,604
 1.7 %
Total operating expenses1,587,849
 97.8 % 1,569,628
 99.5 %
        
Operating income36,033
 2.2 % 8,617
 0.5 %
        
Non-operating expense:       
Interest expense, net1,278
 0.1 % 1,583
 0.1 %
Other income(5,363) (0.3)% 
  %
Equity in net (gain) loss of investees(12,054) (0.7)% 10,287
 0.7 %
Gain on sale of equity investment(12,377) (0.8)% 
  %
Loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions345
  % (1,375) (0.1)%
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes64,204
 4.0 % (1,878) (0.1)%
Provision for income taxes4,401
 0.3 % 17,036
 1.1 %
Income (loss) from continuing operations59,803
 3.7 % (18,914) (1.2)%
Discontinued operations, net of tax(5,983) (0.4)% 108,760
 6.9 %
Net income53,820
 3.3 % 89,846
 5.7 %
Net (gain) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest(451)  % 2,082
 0.1 %
Net income attributable to Providence53,369
 3.3 % 91,928
 5.8 %
Service revenue, net. Consolidated service revenue, net, for 20172023 increased $45.6$246.8 million, or 2.9%9.9%, compared to 2016. Revenue2022. Service revenue, net, increased by $183.0 million for 2017our NEMT segment, increased by $47.9 million for our PCS segment, and increased by $9.7 million for our RPM segment. See our Results of Operations - Segments, for further discussion of the revenue drivers at each respective segment.

Grant income. The Company recognized income of approximately $5.0 million during 2023 compared to 2016 includes$7.4 million during 2022 related to government grant distributions received, primarily under the CARES Act PRF and the ARPA SLFRF. These government grants are targeted to providing economic relief and stimulus to combat health and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. These funds were received by our PCS segment and are available to eligible providers who have healthcare-related expenses and lost revenues attributable to COVID-19.

Service expense. Service expense components are shown below (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 20232022
 Amount% of Service
Revenue
Amount% of Service
Revenue
Purchased services$1,456,796 53.0%$1,267,006 50.6%
Payroll and related costs772,629 28.1%706,216 28.2%
Other operating expenses74,793 2.7%58,852 2.3%
Total service expense$2,304,218 83.8%$2,032,074 81.1%

Service expense for 2023 increased $272.1 million, or 13.4%, compared to 2022 primarily due to higher purchased services for our NEMT segment of $189.8 million driven by an increase in revenuetransportation costs to support higher trip volumes
63


that occurred in 2023. Payroll and related costs across all segments increased by $66.4 million, primarily related to increased labor costs paid to our caregivers and contact center employees and additional hours of NET Services of $84.5 million, which was partially offset by a decrease in revenue of WD Services of $38.7 million. Excluding the effects of changes in currency exchange rates, consolidated service revenue increased 3.4% in 2017 compared to 2016.provided during 2023.

Total operating expenses. Consolidated operating expensesGeneral and administrative expense. General and administrative expense for 2017 increased $18.22023 decreased $17.6 million, or 1.2%5.5%, compared to 2016. Operating expenses2022, primarily related to fewer one-time costs for 2017 compared to 2016 included an increase in expenses attributable to NET Services of $95.8 millionrestructuring and Corporateintegration activities. General and Other of $2.5 million. Partially offsetting theseadministrative expense increases was a decrease in WD Services’ operating expenses of $80.2 million. 2016 operating expenses include asset impairment charges of $19.6 million at WD Services and $1.4 million at Corporate and Other.
Operating income. Consolidated operating income for 2017 increased $27.4 million compared to 2016 due to a decrease in the operating loss of WD Services in 2017 of $41.4 million, as compared to 2016. This change was partially offset by a decrease in operating income of NET Services in 2017 as compared to 2016 of $11.3 million and an increase in the operating loss for Corporate and Other of $2.7 million in 2017 as compared to 2016.


Interest expense, net. Consolidated interest expense, net for 2017 decreased $0.3 million, or 19.3%, compared to 2016, and remained consistentexpressed as a percentage of revenue.

Other income. Other income in 2017service revenue, net, decreased slightly to 11.1% for 2023 as compared to 12.9% for 2022. See our Results of $5.4 million represents the settlement received from the Haverhill Litigation, see Item 3. Legal Proceedings Operations - Segments, for further informationdiscussion.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization for 2023 increased $3.9 million, or 3.8%, compared to 2022 primarily as a result $2.2 million of depreciation and amortization expense related to property, equipment and intangible assets brought on under the Guardian Medical Monitoring ("GMM") acquisition in May 2022.

Impairment of goodwill. Impairment of goodwill for 2023 was $183.1 million and is a result of goodwill impairments that were recorded at our PCS and RPM reporting units during the second quarter of 2023. See Note 9, Goodwill and Intangible Assets.

Interest expense, net. Interest expense, net, for 2023 increased $7.2 million, or 11.6%, compared to 2022. During 2023, we incurred interest of $32.3 million and $26.5 million related to the Senior Notes due 2025 and 2029, respectively. The remainder of the interest expense during 2023 is related to interest and fees incurred related to borrowings on the settlement.credit facility, which drove the increase during 2023 due to increased borrowing activity on the credit facility as compared to 2022. Interest expense is recorded at our Corporate and Other segment.


Equity in net (gain) lossincome (loss) of investees.investee, net of tax. Our equity in net (gain) lossincome of investeesinvestee, net of tax for 20172023 of $12.1$0.3 million includes an equity in net loss for Mission Providence of $1.4 million through the sale date on September 29, 2017, and an equity in net gain for Matrix of $13.4 million. Ourour equity in net loss of investeesinvestee, net of tax for 20162022 of $10.3$30.0 million includes an equity in net loss for Mission Providence of $8.5 million and Matrix of $1.8 million. We began reporting Matrix as an equity investment effective October 19, 2016, upon the completion of the Matrix Transaction, and we record our ownership percentage of Matrix’s profit or loss in net loss or gain of investees. Included in Matrix’s 2017 full standalone net income of $26.7 million (which is not consolidated with Providence’s) are depreciation and amortization of $33.5 million, interest expense of $14.8 million, transaction bonuses and other transaction related costs of $3.5 million, equity compensation of $2.6 million, management fees paid to Matrix’s shareholders of $2.3 million, merger and acquisition diligence related costs of $0.7 million and income tax benefit of $29.6 million. Matrix’s significant income tax benefit in 2017 primarily related to the re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities arising from a lower U.S. corporate tax rate aswas a result of our proportional share of the Tax Reform Act. Included in Matrix’s 2016 full standalone net income or loss of $4.2Matrix and our investment in a captive insurance program. The loss during 2022 was the result of our share of an asset impairment that occurred at Matrix for $82.2 million (which is not consolidatedduring 2022 with Providence’s) are depreciation and amortization of $6.4 million, interest expense of $2.9 million, transaction bonuses and other transaction related costs of $6.4 million, equity compensation of $0.4 million, management fees paid to Matrix’s shareholders of $0.4 million and incomeno comparable asset impairment during 2023.

Income tax benefit of $2.8 million.

Gain on sale of equity investment. The gain on sale of equity investment of $12.4 million relates to the sale of the Company’s equity interest in Mission Providence in 2017. The investment in Mission Providence was part of the WD Services segment. The sale of Mission Providence is not included as a discontinued operation as the disposition did not represent a strategic shift that has a major effect on our operations and financial results.
Loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions. The foreign currency loss of $0.3 million and gain of $1.4 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively, were primarily due to translation adjustments of our foreign subsidiaries.
Provision for income taxes.(provision). Our effective tax rate from continuing operationsrates for 2017 was 6.9%.2023 and 2022 were a benefit of 2.1% and a benefit of 62.2%, respectively. The 2023 effective tax rate for the benefit was significantly lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35%21.0% primarily due to the impactnondeductible goodwill impairment recorded during the year. The 2022 effective tax rate for the benefit was significantly higher than the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21.0% primarily due to tax credits and stock-based compensation windfalls from tax deductions on stock option exercises and vesting of stock awards that exceeded book expense recognized due to increased share price, offset by state income taxes and certain non-deductible expenses.

Year Ended December 31, 2022 compared to year ended December 31, 2021

For a comparison of our results of operations see “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Form 10-K for the Tax Reform Act. fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, filed with the SEC on March 7, 2023.


64


Results of Operations - Segments

The tax provision includes a benefit of $16.0 million relatedfollowing tables set forth certain financial information attributable to the enactmentCompany’s business segments for 2023 and 2022:

NEMT Segment

(in thousands, except for Revenue per member per month, Revenue per trip, and Service expense per trip):

Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Amount% of Segment Service RevenueAmount% of Segment Service Revenue
Operating Results
Service revenue, net$1,951,447 100.0%$1,768,442 100.0%
Service expense1,709,790 87.6%1,487,447 84.1%
General and administrative expense115,355 5.9%146,935 8.3%
Depreciation and amortization27,409 1.4%28,709 1.6%
Operating income$98,893 5.1%$105,351 6.0%
Business Metrics(1)
Total paid trips34,559 30,795 
Average monthly members33,648 34,203 
Revenue per member per month$4.83 $4.31 
Revenue per trip$56.47 $57.43 
Service expense per trip$49.47 $48.30 
Utilization8.6 %7.5 %

(1)     These metrics are key performance indicators that Management uses to evaluate our performance. Trends established in these metrics can be used to evaluate current operating results, identify trends affecting our business, determine the allocation of resources and understand the Tax Reform Actunderlying drivers of costs and revenue for our business. We believe these metrics are useful to investors in evaluating and understanding our business but should not be used solely in assessing the Company’s performance. These key performance indicators should not be considered superior to, as a substitute for or as an alternative to, and should be considered in conjunction with, the GAAP financial measures presented herein to fully evaluate and understand the business as a whole.

The NEMT segment is the largest manager of non-emergency medical transportation programs for state governments and MCOs in the U.S.

Service revenue, net. Service revenue, net, increased by $183.0 million, or 10.3%, during 2023 as compared to 2022. This increase is primarily attributable to a 12.1% increase in revenue per member per month, which was driven by a 12.2% increase in trip volume. These two factors correlated due to contract repricing and the fourth quarterpartial pass-through of 2017, consisting of a net tax benefit of $19.4 million fromcosts associated with our reconciliation, risk corridor or profit rebate contracts (which are considered shared-risk contracts due to the re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities from the lower U.S. corporate tax rate,reconciliation provisions). This increase to revenue was partially offset by additional taxa 1.6% decrease in average monthly membership primarily as a result of Medicaid redetermination.

The change in revenue is impacted by both the change in average monthly members as well as the rate received per member. The change in average monthly members is correlated to the change in revenue because a majority of our contracts are capitated, and we receive monthly payments on a per member per month basis in return for full or shared risk of transportation volumes. Declines in membership over the periods presented were anticipated and primarily related to Medicaid redetermination efforts, along with certain contract losses. While membership decreased, revenue increased due to increases in the average rate received per member, which increases in line with increases in utilization or trip volume in our shared risk
65


contracts. As most of our capitated contracts have been restructured to a shared risk format, revenue increased despite the decline in membership. Trip volume increases also positively affected revenue for fee-for-service contracts due to a larger number of services performed.

Service expense. Service expense components for the NEMT segment are shown below (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 20232022
 Amount% of Segment RevenueAmount% of Segment Revenue
Purchased services$1,456,796 74.7 %$1,267,006 71.6 %
Payroll and related costs203,199 10.3 %180,382 10.2 %
Other service expenses49,795 2.6 %40,059 2.3 %
Total service expense$1,709,790 87.6 %$1,487,447 84.1 %

Service expense for our NEMT segment primarily consists of $3.4transportation costs paid to third party transportation providers, salaries of employees within our contact centers and operations centers, and occupancy costs. Service expense increased by $222.3 million, or 14.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022, primarily related to higher purchased services of $189.8 million, or 15.0%, related to an increase in transportation costs due to an increase in trip volume of 12.2% for 2023 as compared to 2022. Purchased service expense per trip increased by 2.5% due to increased wages for our equity in net gaintransportation providers and payroll and related costs and other service expenses increased by 2.2% due to increased wages for our contact center employees, as compared to 2022.

General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense primarily consists of Matrixsalaries for administrative employees that support the operations of the NEMT segment, occupancy costs, marketing expenditures, insurance, and professional fees. General and administrative expense decreased by $31.6 million, or 21.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2022, primarily as a result of Matrix's re-measurementvarious cost savings initiatives which resulted in a decrease of deferred tax liabilities. In addition, the Company incurred tax expense of $3.6$6.4 million related to the HoldCo LTIP, for whichpersonnel expense, was recorded for financial reporting purposes based upon fair value of the award at the grant date, but no shares will be issued due to the market condition of the award not being satisfied. This tax expense was the result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09, which subjects our tax rate to quarterly volatility from the effects of stock award exercises and vesting activities, including the adverse impact on our income tax provision for awards which result in a tax deduction less than the amount recorded for financial reporting purposes.

During 2016, we recognized an income tax provision despite having a loss from continuing operations before income taxes. Because of foreign net operating losses (including equity investee losses) for which the future income tax benefit could not be recognized, and non-deductible expenses, the Company recognized taxable income for this year upon which the income tax provision for financial reporting is calculated.
Discontinued operations, net of tax. Discontinued operations, net of tax, includes the activity of our former Human Services segment and our former HA Services segment, composed entirely of our 100% ownership in Matrix until the completion of the Matrix Transaction on October 19, 2016. For 2017, discontinued operations, net of tax for our Human Services segment was a loss of $6.0 million, which primarily related to the accrual of a contingent liability of $9.0 million related to the settlement of indemnification claims and associated legal costs of $0.7 million, partially offset by a related tax benefit. Discontinued operations, net of tax for our Human Services segment was a loss of $5.6 million in 2016, which included an accrual of $6.0 million with respect to potential indemnification claims, legal costs of $1.1 million related to these potential claims and transaction related expenses of $0.8 million, partially offset by a related tax benefit. Discontinued operations, net of tax for our HA Services segment was income of $114.3 million for 2016, which included a gain on disposition, net of tax, of $109.4 million. See Note 20, Discontinued Operations, to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.


Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests. Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests primarily relates to a minority interest held by a third-party operating partner in our company servicing the offender rehabilitation contract in our WD Services segment.
Segment Results. The following analysis includes discussion of each of our segments.
NET Services
NET Services financial results are as follows for 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Service revenue, net1,318,220
 100.0% 1,233,720
 100.0%
Service expense1,227,426
 93.1% 1,132,857
 91.8%
General and administrative expense11,779
 0.9% 11,406
 0.9%
Depreciation and amortization13,275
 1.0% 12,375
 1.0%
Operating income65,740
 5.0% 77,082
 6.2%
Service revenue, net. Service revenue, net for NET Services in 2017 increased $84.5 million, or 6.8%, compared to 2016. The increase was related to net increased revenue from existing contracts, including successfully renewed contracts, of $82.5 million, due to the net impact of membership and rate changes. Included within net rate changes are the positive impacts of final agreements on rate adjustments related to existing contracts that experienced increased utilization in 2017 as well as the release of previously accrued revenue hold-backs based on certain contract performance requirements on a significant contract. Additionally, the impact of new contracts, including new managed care organization contracts in Florida and New York, contributed $93.8 million of revenue for 2017. These increases were partially offset by the $91.8 million impact on revenue of contracts we no longer serve, including a contract with the state of New York. 

Service expense. Service expense is comprised of the following for 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Purchased services1,009,518
 76.6% 927,321
 75.2%
Payroll and related costs165,666
 12.6% 162,000
 13.1%
Other operating expenses51,720
 3.9% 42,478
 3.4%
Stock-based compensation522
 % 1,058
 0.1%
Total service expense1,227,426
 93.1% 1,132,857
 91.8%
Service expense for 2017 increased $94.6 million, or 8.3%, compared to 2016. The increase in service expense was primarily attributable to the impact of new managed care organization contracts in California, Florida and New York. Purchased services as a percentage of revenue increased from 75.2% in 2016 to 76.6% in 2017 primarily attributable to an increase in utilization across multiple contracts. The higher utilization was in part driven by increased Medicaid reimbursement in New Jersey for certain medical services, increasing the demand for transportation services, and increased utilization across multiple managed care contracts in California. Additionally, due to milder winter weather conditions during the first quarter of 2017, we experienced above expected utilization; however, we experienced lower utilization for contracts in the third quarter of 2017 due in part to the impact of Hurricane Irma. The increase in purchased services as a percentage of revenue caused by increased utilization was partially offset by the successful implementation of initiatives aimed at lowering transportation costs on a per trip and per mile basis as well as the release of a reserve based upon the finalization of a contract amendment with a state customer.

Payroll and related costs as a percentage of revenue decreased from 13.1% in 2016 to 12.6% in 2017 due to efficiencies gained from multiple process improvement initiatives, including those aimed at lowering payroll expense across our reservation


and operation center networks, as well as a decrease in chief executive officer compensationitems that are one-time in nature, such as a decrease of $10.3 million related to lower professional service expense dueand a decrease of $11.2 million related to legal expense as a result of a case that was settled in 2022.

Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $1.3 million, or 4.5%, for the transition of the chief executive officer position during 2017. Other operating expenses increased for 2017year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to 2016the year ended December 31, 2022, as a result of certain intangible assets being fully amortized during the period.

66


PCS Segment

(in thousands, except Service revenue per hour and Service expense per hour):

Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Amount% of Segment Service RevenueAmount% of Segment Service Revenue
Operating Results
Service revenue, net$715,615 100.0%$667,674 100.0%
Grant income5,037 0.7%7,351 1.1%
Service expense561,919 78.5%520,065 77.9%
General and administrative expense86,767 12.1%91,365 13.7%
Depreciation and amortization51,402 7.2%51,025 7.6%
Impairment of goodwill137,331 19.2%— —%
Operating income (loss)$(116,767)(16.3)%$12,570 1.9%
Business Metrics(1)
Total hours27,826 26,918 
Service revenue per hour$25.72 $24.80 
Service expense per hour$20.19 $19.32 

(1)     These metrics are key performance indicators that Management uses to evaluate our performance. Trends established in these metrics can be used to evaluate current operating results, identify trends affecting our business, determine the allocation of resources and understand the underlying drivers of costs and revenue for our business. We believe these metrics are useful to investors in evaluating and understanding our business but should not be used solely in assessing the Company’s performance. These key performance indicators should not be considered superior to, as a substitute for or as an alternative to, and should be considered in conjunction with, the GAAP financial measures presented herein to fully evaluate and understand the business as a whole.

Our PCS segment’s services include placements of non-medical personal care assistants and home health aides and nurses primarily attributable to an incremental $4.1 millionMedicaid patient populations in need of value enhancementcare monitoring and related costs incurred for external resources usedassistance performing daily living activities in the designhome setting, including senior citizens and implementationdisabled adults.

Service revenue, net. PCS contracts are generally structured as fee-for-service contracts, with revenue driven by the number of NET Services member experience and value enhancement initiativeshours worked by our personal care providers. Service revenue, net, increased by $47.9 million or 7.2% for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to 2022, primarily due to 3.4% higher hours worked by our personal care providers in 2017,2023 as compared to 2022, as well as 3.7% higher rates per hour during the same period.

Grant income. During the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, the Company recognized income for government grant distributions received of $5.0 million and $7.4 million, respectively, primarily from the CARES Act PRF and the ARPA SLFRF. These government grants are targeted to providing economic relief and stimulus to combat health and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. These funds were received by our PCS segment and are available to eligible providers who have healthcare-related expenses and lost revenues attributable to COVID-19.

67


Service expense. Service expense components for the PCS segment are shown below (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 20232022
 Amount% of Segment Service RevenueAmount% of Segment Service Revenue
Payroll and related costs$555,606 77.6 %$513,748 76.9 %
Other service expenses6,313 0.9 %6,317 1.0 %
Total service expense$561,919 78.5 %$520,065 77.9 %

Service expense for our PCS segment primarily consists of salaries for our employees that provide personal care services and it typically trends with the number of hours worked and total cost per hour of service. Service expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 increased software and hardware maintenance costs associated with increased use of information technology.
General and administrative expense. General and administrative expenses in 2017 increased $0.4by $41.9 million, or 3.3%8.0%, as compared to 2016, due to increased facility costs resulting from the overall growth of our operations. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expense remained constant at 0.9%.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $0.9 million primarily due to the addition of long-lived assets relating to information technology projects. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization remained constant at 1.0%. Atyear ended December 31, 2017, NET Services has $11.9 million of construction and development in progress related to its LCAD NextGen technology system, which is expected to be placed into service in 2018.
WD Services
WD Services financial results are as follows for 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Service revenue, net305,662
 100.0% 344,403
 100.0 %
        
Service expense265,417
 86.8% 320,147
 93.0 %
General and administrative expense25,438
 8.3% 30,300
 8.8 %
Asset impairment charge
 % 19,588
 5.7 %
Depreciation and amortization12,851
 4.2% 13,824
 4.0 %
Operating income (loss)1,956
 0.6% (39,456) (11.5)%

Service revenue, net. Service revenue, net in 2017 decreased $38.7 million, or 11.2%, compared to 2016. Excluding the effects of changes in currency exchange rates, service revenue decreased 8.9% in 2017 compared to 2016, which was primarily related to the anticipated decline of referrals under the segment’s Work Programme contracts in the UK, as well as decreased revenue under our offender rehabilitation program. While WD Services has successfully secured contracts under the UK's new Work and Health Programme, the successor program to the Work Programme, with a combined total value of approximately $195 million over 5 years, revenues under these new contracts were negligible in 2017 and did not offset declines in revenue experienced under the Work Programme contracts. These decreases were partially offset by increases across various employability contracts outside the UK, including in Australia, France, Germany and the U.S., as well as increased revenue from our health services contract in the UK. 2017 includes the impact of $5.2 million of revenue recognized under the offender rehabilitation program related to the finalization of a contractual adjustment for the contract year ended March 31, 2017, whereas 2016 includes $5.4 million of revenue recognized under the offender rehabilitation program related to the finalization of a contractual adjustment for the prior contract years ended March 31, 2015 and 2016.















Service expense. Service expense is comprised of the following for 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Payroll and related costs177,195
 58.0% 210,293
 61.1 %
Purchased services49,491
 16.2% 65,363
 19.0 %
Other operating expenses38,675
 12.7% 44,502
 12.9 %
Stock-based compensation56
 % (11)  %
Total service expense265,417
 86.8% 320,147
 93.0 %

Service expense in 2017 decreased $54.7 million, or 17.1%, compared to 2016. Payroll and related costs decreased primarily as a result of declining referrals under the segment’s primary employability program in the UK as well as redundancy plans that better aligned headcount with service delivery volumes, resulting in a decrease of payroll and related costs as a percentage of revenue. Payroll and related costs include $2.6 million and $8.5 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively, of termination benefits related to redundancy plans. Purchased services decreased in 2017 compared to 20162022, primarily as a result of a decline4.5% increase in client referrals underservice expense per hour, driven primarily by increased wage rates for our primary employability programcaregivers, predominately from wage pressures in the UK, which resultedNew York, in combination with a decline3.4% increase in the usehours of outsourced services. Other operating expenses decreased in 2017service during 2023 as compared to 2016 primarily as a result of a decline in consulting related costs and information technology maintenance costs.2022.

General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense in 2017primarily consists of salaries for administrative employees that support the operations of the PCS segment, occupancy costs, marketing expenditures, insurance, and professional fees. General and administrative expense decreased $4.9by $4.6 million, or 5.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2016. The decrease was due to office closures associated with the restructuring of the UK operations, as well as lower rent for certain offices. Additionally, $2.0 million of the decrease2022, primarily related to the impact of acquisitionlower insurance-related expense and lower legal fees during 2023 along with lower integration related contingencies that were favorably resolved in 2017, resulting in a benefit to general and administrative expense.expenses during 2023.

Asset impairment charge. During the fourth quarter of 2016, WD Services recorded asset impairment charges of $10.0 million, $4.4 million and $5.2 million to its property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill, respectively, primarily due to lower than expected volumes and unfavorable service mix shifts under a large contract in the UK impacting future projections; additional clarity into the anticipated size and structure of the Work and Health Programme in the UK; and the absence of additional details regarding the restructuring of the offender rehabilitation contract in the UK. No impairment charges were incurred in 2017.
Depreciation and amortization expense.Depreciation and amortization expense remained consistent for 2017 decreased $1.0the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 with an increase of $0.4 million, or 0.7%, for 2023 as compared to 2016,2022.

Impairment of goodwill. As a result of our annual goodwill assessment, we determined that the goodwill within our PCS reporting unit was impaired which resulted in an impairment of goodwill charge of $137.3 million during the second quarter of 2023.

RPM Segment

(in thousands, except Revenue per member per month and Service expense per member per month):

Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Amount% of Segment Service RevenueAmount% of Segment Service Revenue
Operating Results
Service revenue, net$77,941 100.0%$68,277 100.0%
Service expense27,025 34.7%24,562 36.0%
General and administrative expense22,971 29.5%23,156 33.9%
Depreciation and amortization24,536 31.5%19,854 29.1%
Impairment of goodwill45,769 58.7%— —%
Operating income (loss)$(42,360)(54.3)%$705 1.0%
Business Metrics(1)
Average monthly members244 210 
Revenue per member per month$26.62 $27.09 
Service expense per member per month$9.23 $9.75 

68


(1)     These metrics are key performance indicators that Management uses to evaluate our performance. Trends established in these metrics can be used to evaluate current operating results, identify trends affecting our business, determine the allocation of resources and understand the underlying drivers of costs and revenue for our business. We believe these metrics are useful to investors in evaluating and understanding our business but should not be used solely in assessing the Company’s performance. These key performance indicators should not be considered superior to, as a substitute for or as an alternative to, and should be considered in conjunction with, the GAAP financial measures presented herein to fully evaluate and understand the business as a whole.

Our RPM segment is a provider of remote patient monitoring solutions and manages a comprehensive suite of services, including personal emergency response systems, vitals monitoring and data-driven patient engagement solutions.

Service revenue, net. RPM contracts are generally structured as a fixed fee per enrolled member per month and therefore, revenue is generally driven by the number of enrolled members. Service revenue, net, increased by $9.7 million, or 14.2%, for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022, primarily duerelated to incremental revenue of $7.5 million from the acquisition of GMM that occurred in May 2022, which also contributed to the asset impairment charges incurred during16.2% increase in average monthly members from 2022 to 2023.

Service expense. Service expense components for the fourth quarter of 2016, which decreased the value of our intangible assets and certain property and equipment.

Corporate and Other
Corporate and Other includes the headcount and professional service costs incurred at the Providence corporate level, our captive insurance company, and elimination entries to account for inter-segment transactions. Corporate and Other financial resultsRPM segment are as follows for 2017 and 2016shown below (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 20232022
 Amount% of Segment Service RevenueAmount% of Segment Service Revenue
Payroll and related costs$13,539 17.4 %$12,086 17.7 %
Other service expenses13,486 17.3 %12,476 18.3 %
Total service expense$27,025 34.7 %$24,562 36.0 %
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
 $ $
Service revenue, net
 122
    
Service expense (a)(3,799) (894)
General and administrative expense35,119
 28,205
Asset impairment charge
 1,415
Depreciation and amortization343
 405
Operating loss(31,663) (29,009)



(a)Negative amounts are present for this line item due to changes in estimate for claims incurred but not reported, as well as elimination entries that are included in Corporate and Other. Certain offsetting amounts are reflected in the financial results of our operating segments.

Operating loss. CorporateService expense for our RPM segment primarily consists of salaries for the employees providing the remote monitoring services and Other operating loss in 2017it typically trends with the number of hours worked. Service expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 increased by $2.7$2.5 million, or 9.1%10.0%, as compared to 2016 primarily due to an increase in cash settled stock-based compensation expense of $3.6 million,2022, primarily as a result of an increase in direct wages driven by the Company’s stock price in 2017 as comparedadditional hours worked to a decrease in 2016, anservice the 16.2% increase in share settled stock-based compensation expense of $2.7 million, primarily related to an increase in expense for the HoldCo LTIP despite this program expiring with no shares due to any employees, expense for stock options issued to a former chief executive officer upon separation from the Company, and a benefit recorded in 2016 for performance based units, with no corresponding benefit in 2017,average monthly members as well as an increase of $3.8 million of professionalin device connectivity costs duerelated to activities associated with our increased focus on strategic initiatives. This increase was partially offset by a reduction in insurance loss reserves of $3.5 million in 2017, versus $2.5 million in 2016, duethe additional devices deployed to favorable claims history of our Captive reinsurance programs, as well as decreased costs ofservice the Captive operations due to no longer writing new policies as of May 2017, which is included in “Service expense”, decreased accounting, legal and professional fees included in “Generalhigher membership levels.

General and administrative expense”, and decreased asset impairment charges, as $1.4 million was recorded in 2016 in relation to the sale of a building.

expense.General and administrative expense includes stock-based compensationprimarily consists of salaries for administrative employees that indirectly support the HoldCo LTIPoperations of $4.7 millionthe RPM segment, occupancy costs, marketing expenditures, insurance, and $3.3 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively. No shares will be distributed under the HoldCo LTIP as the volume weighted average of Providence’s stock price over the 90-day trading period ended on December 31, 2017 was less than $56.79. As such, as of December 31, 2017, we accelerated all remaining unrecognized compensation expense for the Holdco LTIP as there was no further requisite service period associated with the award resulting in an acceleration of expense of $1.1 million.professional fees. General and administrative expense also includes $0.4 million and $1.6 millionremained relatively consistent for 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to a shareholder lawsuit.

Costs associated with the resignation of Mr. Lindstrom during the year ended December 31, 2017 include cash compensation related items of $0.9 million, stock-based compensation of $0.7 million, and other costs2023 as compared to 2022, with a decrease of $0.2 million. These costs are recorded as part of “Generalmillion, or 0.8%.

Depreciation and administrative expense”.



Year ended December 31, 2016 compared toamortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $4.7 million, or 23.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2015
The following table sets forth results of operations and the percentage of consolidated total revenues represented by items in our consolidated statements of income for 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 Year ended December 31,
 2016 2015
 $ 
Percentage
of Revenue
 $ 
Percentage
of Revenue
Service revenue, net1,578,245
 100.0 % 1,478,010
 100.0 %
        
Operating expenses:       
Service expense1,452,110
 92.0 % 1,381,154
 93.4 %
General and administrative expense69,911
 4.4 % 70,986
 4.8 %
Asset impairment charge21,003
 1.3 % 
  %
Depreciation and amortization26,604
 1.7 % 23,998
 1.6 %
Total operating expenses1,569,628
 99.5 % 1,476,138
 99.9 %
        
Operating income8,617
 0.5 % 1,872
 0.1 %
        
Non-operating expense:       
Interest expense, net1,583
 0.1 % 1,853
 0.1 %
Equity in net loss of investees10,287
 0.7 % 10,970
 0.7 %
Gain on foreign currency transactions(1,375) (0.1)% (857) (0.1)%
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes(1,878) (0.1)% (10,094) (0.7)%
Provision for income taxes17,036
 1.1 % 14,583
 1.0 %
Income (loss) from continuing operations(18,914) (1.2)% (24,677) (1.7)%
Discontinued operations, net of tax108,760
 6.9 % 107,871
 7.3 %
Net income89,846
 5.7 % 83,194
 5.6 %
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest2,082
 0.1 % 502
  %
Net income attributable to Providence91,928
 5.8 % 83,696
 5.7 %
Service revenue, net. Consolidated service revenue, net for 2016 increased $100.2 million, or 6.8%, compared to 2015. Revenue for 2016 compared to 2015 included an increase in revenue of NET Services of $150.7 million, which was partially offset by a decrease in revenue of WD Services of $50.7 million. Excluding the effects of changes in currency exchange rates, consolidated service revenue increased 8.8% in 2016 compared to 2015.
Total operating expenses. Consolidated operating expenses for 2016 increased $93.5 million, or 6.3%, compared to 2015. Operating expenses for 2016 compared to 2015 included an increase in expenses attributable to NET Services of $144.8 million and Corporate and Other of $2.2 million. Partially offsetting these expense increases was a decrease in WD Services’ operating expenses of $53.6 million. Operating expenses included asset impairment charges of $19.6 million at WD Services and $1.4 million at Corporate and Other during 2016, while no such charges were incurred in 2015.
Operating income. Consolidated operating income for 2016 increased $6.7 million compared to 2015 due to an increase in operating income of NET Services in 20162023 as compared to 20152022, primarily related to additional depreciation and amortization expense of $5.9$2.2 million and a decreaserelated to the assets acquired from the acquisition of GMM that occurred in May 2022 as well as additional depreciation expense related to the operating loss of WD Servicesadditional devices that were in 2016service related to the 16.2% increase in average monthly members in 2023 as compared to 20152022.

Impairment of $2.9 million, although WD Services’ new offender rehabilitation program incurred an operating loss in 2016 as compared to operating income in 2015. In addition, France continued to experience a significant operating loss in 2016, consistent with 2015. These changes were partially offset by an increase in the operating loss for Corporate and Other of $2.0 million, driven primarily by the asset impairment charge of $1.4 million in 2016.


Interest expense, net. Consolidated interest expense, net for 2016 decreased $0.3 million, or 14.6%, compared to 2015. The decrease is primarily related to the repayment of the related party note during 2015, which was partially offset by higher commitment fees on our Credit Facility for 2016 as compared to 2015.

Equity in net loss of investees. Equity in net loss of investees primarily relates to our investments in Mission Providence and Matrix. Mission Providence, which is part of WD Services, began providing services in July 2015. We record 75% of Mission Providence’s profit or loss in equity in net loss of investees. We began reporting Matrix as an equity investment effective October 19, 2016, upon the completion of the Matrix Transaction. Our equity in net loss of investees related to WD Services and Matrix totaled $8.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively, for 2016. Included in Matrix’s results (which are not consolidated with Providence's) is interest expense of $2.9 million and transaction related expenses of $6.0 million, which includes $4.0 million of transaction incentive compensation payable to the Matrix management team.
Gain on foreign currency transactions. The foreign currency gains of $1.4 million and $0.9 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively, were primarily due to translation adjustments of our foreign subsidiaries.
Provision for income taxes. We recognized an income tax provision for 2016 and 2015 despite having losses from continuing operations before income taxes. Because of foreign net operating losses (including equity investee losses) for which the future income tax benefit currently cannot be recognized, and non-deductible expenses such as amortization of deferred consideration related to the Ingeus acquisition, the Company recognized taxable income for these years upon which the income tax provision for financial reporting is calculated.
Discontinued operations, net of tax. Discontinued operations, net of tax, includes the activity of our former Human Services segment and our former HA Services segment, composed entirely of our 100% equity interest in Matrix until the completion of the Matrix Transaction on October 19, 2016. Discontinued operations, net of tax for our Human Services segment was a loss of $5.6 million in 2016 and income of $101.8 million in 2015, respectively. 2016 Human Services results include an accrual of $6.0 million with respect to potential indemnification claims, legal costs of $1.1 million related to these potential claims and transaction related expenses of $0.8 million. 2015 Human Services segment results include a gain on disposition, net of tax, of $100.3 million. Discontinued operations, net of tax for our HA Services segment was income of $114.3 million and $6.1 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively. 2016 HA Services segment results include a gain on disposition, net of tax, of $109.4 million. See Note 20, Discontinued Operations, to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest. Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests primarily relates to the minority interest associated with our company servicing the offender rehabilitation contract in our WD Services segment. As this contract is currently experiencing losses, as further discussed below, we have a net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests.
Segment Results. The following analysis includes discussion of each of our segments.
NET Services
NET Services financial results are as follows for 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Service revenue, net1,233,720
 100.0% 1,083,015
 100.0%
Service expense1,132,857
 91.8% 991,659
 91.6%
General and administrative expense11,406
 0.9% 10,704
 1.0%
Depreciation and amortization12,375
 1.0% 9,429
 0.9%
Operating income77,082
 6.2% 71,223
 6.6%
Service revenue, net. Service revenue, net for NET Services in 2016 increased $150.7 million, or 13.9%, compared to 2015.  The increase related to the impact of new contracts which contributed $76.4 million of revenue in 2016, including contracts in California and Florida, and an increase in revenue associated with existing contracts of $119.8 million due to the net impact of membership and rate changes, partially offset by the loss of certain contracts that resulted in a decrease in revenue of $45.5 million.  


Service expense. Service expense is comprised of the following for 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Purchased services927,321
 75.2% 814,632
 75.2%
Payroll and related costs162,000
 13.1% 141,669
 13.1%
Other operating expenses42,478
 3.4% 34,634
 3.2%
Stock-based compensation1,058
 0.1% 724
 0.1%
Total service expense1,132,857
 91.8% 991,659
 91.6%
Service expense for 2016 increased $141.2 million, or 14.2%, compared to 2015. The increase in service expense was primarily attributable to an increase in purchased transportation services due primarily to higher transportation volume. Purchased services as a percentage of revenue remained constant at 75.2%. Additionally, our payroll and related costs increased for 2016 as compared to 2015 primarily due to the hiring of employees to support new contracts and increased call volume associated with increased utilization, as well as an increase of $1.2 million in expense for the long-term incentive plan for management put into place in the fourth quarter of 2015 and separation related charges for NET Services’ former chief executive officer during 2016 of $0.8 million. Our other operating expenses also increased for 2016 as compared to 2015. The increase was primarily attributable to increased bad debt expense, including $2.1 million of expense related to one specific customer, and costs incurred for external resources used in the design and implementation of NET Services member experience and value enhancement initiatives of $2.0 million. Stock-based compensation increased $0.3 million in 2016 as compared to 2015 primarily due to the expense associated with new stock-based compensation awards granted in 2016 that vested in January 2017. 
General and administrative expense. General and administrative expenses in 2016 increased $0.7 million, or 6.6%, as compared to 2015, due to increased facility costs resulting from the overall growth of our operations. As a percentage of revenue, general and administrative expense decreased slightly from 1.0% for 2015 to 0.9% for 2016.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $2.9 million primarily due to the addition of long-lived assets in our call centers. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization increased slightly from 0.9% for 2015 to 1.0% for 2016.
WD Services
WD Services financial results are as follows for 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Service revenue, net344,403
 100.0 % 395,059
 100.0 %
        
Service expense320,147
 93.0 % 393,803
 99.7 %
General and administrative expense30,300
 8.8 % 29,846
 7.6 %
Asset impairment charge19,588
 5.7 % 
  %
Depreciation and amortization13,824
 4.0 % 13,776
 3.5 %
Operating income (loss)(39,456) (11.5)% (42,366) (10.7)%

Service revenue, net. Service revenue, net in 2016 decreased $50.7 million, or 12.8%, compared to 2015. Excluding the effects of changes in currency exchange rates, service revenue decreased 5.1% in 2016 compared to 2015, which was primarily related to revenue declines associated with declining referrals and an altered pricing structure under the segment’s primary employability program in the UK and a revised bidding strategy in certain markets. Implemented in late 2015, the overhauled bidding process emphasized the pursuit of only those contracts that meet certain investment criteria, including risk-weighted return


on capital thresholds, and involve the provision of services where we believe our experience will allow us to deliver differentiated and improved outcomes for our clients. goodwill. As a result of this enhanced criteria and a challenging UK outsourcing industry, new contracts have been more infrequent and smallerour annual goodwill assessment, we determined that the goodwill within our RPM reporting unit was impaired which resulted in nature. The decrease was partially offset by two new contracts in France that began in 2015 and growthan impairment of NCS youth programs in 2016. WD Services additionally recognized revenuegoodwill charge of $5.4$45.8 million for 2016 under its offender rehabilitation program related toduring the finalization of a contractual adjustment for contract years ended March 31, 2015 and 2016, which partially offset the decline in revenue under this contract for 2016.
Service expense. Service expense is comprised of the following for 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
 $ 
Percentage of
Revenue
Payroll and related costs210,293
 61.1 % 249,130
 63.1%
Purchased services65,363
 19.0 % 78,498
 19.9%
Other operating expenses44,502
 12.9 % 45,418
 11.5%
Stock-based compensation(11)  % 20,757
 5.3%
Total service expense320,147
 93.0 % 393,803
 99.7%

Service expense in 2016 decreased $73.7 million, or 18.7%, compared to 2015. Payroll and related costs decreased primarily as a result of the redundancy plans implemented in the fourthsecond quarter of 2015 that were designed to better align headcount with service delivery volumes as well as declining referrals under the segment’s primary employability program 2023.

69


Corporate and Other Segment

(in the UK. Partially offsetting these decreasesthousands)

Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Service revenue, net$6,167 $— 
Service expense5,484 — 
General and administrative expense79,471 60,715 
Depreciation and amortization924 827 
Operating loss$(79,712)$(61,542)

Our Corporate and Other segment was increased payroll and related costs associated with a significant new offender rehabilitation program that began in 2015 and higher payroll expenses in France associated with new programs implemented in 2015 and 2016. As referenced above, both the segment’s new offender rehabilitation program and operations in France had significant operating losses in 2016. In addition, $8.5 million in termination benefits related to three redundancy plans contributed to losses in 2016. Purchased services decreased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarilyestablished beginning January 1, 2022 as a result of a declinesegment reorganization completed by the Company. The Corporate and Other segment includes the Company's executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal, public reporting, and corporate development functions. This segment also includes the results of our equity investment in client referrals under our primary employability programMatrix and the operating results of investments in the UK which required less use of outsourced services. Stock-based compensation decreased $20.8 million in 2016 as compared to 2015 primarily due to expenses totaling $16.1 millioninnovation related to data analytics products and solutions, which contributes to our strategic investment in growth.

Service revenue, net and Service expense: At the settlementend of outstanding awards in the fourthfirst quarter of 20152023, we made an investment in relation to the separation of two executives, who were also sellers of Ingeus to Providence, as further described in Note 13, Stock-Based Compensation and Similar Arrangements¸innovation related to our consolidated financial statements.data analytics capabilities within our Corporate and Other segment, which contributes to service revenue, net and service expense.

General and administrative expense.General and administrative expense in 2016 increased $0.5 million compared to 2015. $2.5 million of the increase relates to the impact of the reduction in the fair value of contingent consideration that was recorded in 2015. Offsetting this increase were decreased facility costs of $2.0 million primarily due to the closure of numerous sites in the UK, partially offset by the opening of new sites in France during 2016.
Asset impairment charge. During the fourth quarter of 2016, WD Services recorded asset impairment charges of $10.0 million, $4.4 million and $5.2 million to its property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill, respectively, primarily due to lower than expected volumes and unfavorable service mix shifts under a large contract in the UK impacting future projections; additional clarity into the anticipated size and structure of the Work and Health Programme in the UK; and the absence of additional details regarding the restructuring of the offender rehabilitation contract in the UK. No impairment charges were incurred in 2015.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense for 2016 was flat compared to 2015.



Corporate and Other
amortization: Our Corporate and Other includes the headcount and professional servicesegment holds costs incurred atrelated to strategy and stewardship of the Providence corporate level, our captive insurance company,other operating segments. These expenses are primarily general and elimination entriesadministrative expenses, with a small amount related to account for inter-segment transactions. Corporatedepreciation. The general and Other financial results are as follows for 2016 and 2015 (in thousands): 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
 $ $
Service revenue, net (a)122
 (64)
    
Service expense (a)(894) (4,308)
General and administrative expense28,205
 30,436
Asset impairment charge1,415
 
Depreciation and amortization405
 793
Operating loss(29,009) (26,985)
(a)Negative amounts are present for this line item due to elimination entries that are included in Corporate and Other. Offsetting amounts are reflected in the financial results of our operating segments.

Operating loss. Corporate and Other operating loss in 2016administrative expense increased by $2.0$18.8 million, or 7.5%30.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 20152022. This increase is primarily related to software implementation costs for ongoing system integration projects, including general ledger and personnel management system integrations. This balance has also increased due to a $4.5 million decrease in benefits associated with favorable claims experiences on our reinsuranceconsulting costs and self-insured programs, an asset impairment charge of $1.4 million in 2016 and a $0.4 million net increase in compensation related expenses. The $0.4 million net increase in compensation expenses in 2016 was primarily due to an increase in short-term incentives and $1.0 million of compensationlitigation costs related to the sale of the Company’s Human Services segment in 2015. Also included in 2016 were $1.6 million of expenses related to a shareholder lawsuit, an increase of $0.8 million from 2015. These increases in expense were partially offset by a decrease in various professional fees of $4.0 million. The Company anticipates continued reductions in multiple Corporate and Other expense categories in 2017.executive turnover.

Seasonality
 
Our quarterlyNEMT and PCS segments' operating resultsincome and operating cash flows normally fluctuate as a result of seasonal variations in our business, principally due in part to seasonal factors, unevenlower demand for servicestransportation and the timing of new contracts, which impact the amount of revenues earned and expenses incurred. NET Services experiences fluctuations in demand during the summer and winter seasons. Due to higher demand in the summer months, lower demandin-home services during the winter months, and a primarily fixed revenue stream based on a per-member, per-month payment structure, NET Services normally experiences lower operating margins during the summer season and higherperiods with major holidays as members and patients may spend more time with family and less time alone needing outside care during those periods. While this fluctuation is noted in terms of the use of our services during these seasonal shifts, it does not have a material impact on our results of operations and therefore is not adjusted for. Our RPM segment’s operating margins during the winter. WD Services is impacted by both the timing of commencement and expiration of major contracts. Under many of WD Services’ contracts, we invest significant sums of money in personnel, leased office space, purchased or developed technology, and other costs, and generally incur these costs prior to commencing services and receiving payments. This results in significant variability in financial performanceincome and cash flows between quarters and for comparative periods. It is expected that future contracts will be structured indo not normally fluctuate as a similar fashion. However, the Company does not expect a large variability in financial performance upon the commencementresult of WD Service’s newly secured Work and Health Programme contracts as the upfront implementation investments needed for these contracts are expected to be significantly less than those associated with other large contract commencements undertakenseasonal variations in the past, such as the offender rehabilitation program in 2016. In addition, under the majority of WD Services’ contracts, the Company relies on its customers, which include government agencies, to provide referrals, for which the Company can provide services and earn revenue. The timing and magnitude of referrals can fluctuate significantly, leading to volatility in revenue.business.


Liquidity and capital resourcesCapital Resources

Short-term capital requirements consist primarily of recurring operating expenses, and new contract start-up costs including workforce restructuring costs.on new revenue contracts, interest expense on outstanding borrowings and costs associated with our strategic initiatives. We expect to meet anyour cash requirements in the next 12 months through available cash on hand, cash generated from our operating segments,operations, net of capital expenditures, and borrowing capacityborrowings under our New Credit Facility (as defined below)Facility. For information regarding our long-term capital requirements, see below under the caption "Liquidity".




Cash flow fromused in operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2023 was our primary source of cash during 2017, and included $5.4 million received from the settlement of the Haverhill Litigation. Additionally, 2017 included $15.6 million in proceeds from the sale of our equity investment in Mission Providence which is included in cash provided by investing activities.$83.0 million. Our balance of cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, was $95.3$2.8 million and $72.3$15.0 million at December 31, 20172023 and 2016, respectively, including $40.1 million and $21.4 million held in foreign countries,2022, respectively. The December 31, 2017 foreign cash balance includes the proceeds from the sale of Mission Providence of $15.6 million. Such cash held in foreign countries is generally used to fund foreign operations, although it may also be used to repay intercompany indebtedness existing between Providence and its foreign subsidiaries. As of March 5, 2018, the Company transferred $13.9 million from its foreign operations to its domestic operations since December 31, 2017.

We had restricted cash of $6.3$0.6 million and $14.1$0.5 million at December 31, 20172023 and 2016, respectively, primarily related to contractual obligations and activities of our captive insurance subsidiary. Given expiring policies under our captive insurance subsidiary were not renewed upon expiration in May 2017, we expect our restricted cash balances to decline over time. These restricted2022, respectively. Restricted cash amounts are not included in our balance of cash and cash equivalents. At both December 31, 2017equivalents in the consolidated balance sheets, although they are included in the cash, cash equivalents and 2016, we had no amounts outstanding under our credit facility.restricted cash balance on the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.


We may, from time to time, seek to access capital markets to raise equity or debt financing for various business reasons, including acquisitions. We may also raise debt financing to fund futureacquisitions, repurchases of common stock, investments in our Common Stock.business and possible refinancing activity. The timing, term, size, and pricing of any such financing will depend on investor interest and market conditions, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain any such financing. Our current credit facility expiresfinancing on August 2, 2018. On November 2, 2017,terms acceptable to us at the Company’s Board approved the extension of the Company’s existing stock repurchase program, authorizing the Company to engage in a repurchase program to repurchase up to $69.6 million (the amount remaining from the $100.0 million repurchase amount authorized in 2016) in aggregate value of our Common Stock through December 31, 2018. Through December 31, 2017, the Company repurchased 180,270 shares, for $10.5 million, and $59.1 million was available under the plan to repurchase shares. During the period January 1, 2018 to March 5, 2018, the Company repurchased an additional 527,825 shares for $33.3 million, and $25.8 million was available under the plan to repurchase shares.time or at all.

70


The cash flow statement for all periods presented includes both continuing and discontinued operations. Discontinued operations includes the activity of our Human Services and HA Services segments. The loss from discontinued operations totaled $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, while income from discontinued operations totaled $108.8 million and $107.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For 2017, the loss from discontinued operations primarily related to the accrual of a contingent liability of $9.0 million related to the future settlement of indemnification claims associated with our former Human Services segment, partially offset by a related tax benefit. The significant income from discontinued operations during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 related to the gains on sale of our HA Services segment and Human Services segment, respectively. Significant non-cash items of our discontinued operations in 2016 and 2015 included $3.7 million and $5.7 million of depreciation expense, respectively, $17.5 million and $28.6 million of amortization expense, respectively, and $52.3 million and negative $5.0 million of deferred taxes, respectively. Our discontinued operations also purchased property and equipment totaling $9.2 million and $10.3 million during 2016 and 2015.

20172023 cash flows compared to 20162022


Operating activities. Cash provided byused in operating activities was $55.0$83.0 million for 2017,2023 compared to cash used in operating activities of $10.4 million for 2022. The decrease of $72.5 million was primarily a result of a decrease in cash provided by changes in working capital of $74.2 million. The working capital changes were related to an increase in the cash paid for accounts payable and accrued expenses of $13.3$64.9 million, primarily related to timing of vendor payments during 2023 as compared to 2022. Also contributing to the decrease in working capital is a decrease in the cash received from contract receivables of $26.2 million primarily related to a build of receivables related to risk corridor, profit rebate, and reconciliation contracts. These working capital decreases were partially offset by an increase in cash due to a decrease in cash paid for contract payables of $10.5 million primarily related to repayments on previously accrued contract payable amounts made during 2023 combined with 2016. 2017lower liability reserves on risk corridor, profit rebate and 2016reconciliation contracts due to higher trip volumes during 2023. Also offsetting the working capital decreases was an increase in the change in accrued transportation costs of $6.8 million primarily related to timing of vendor payments to our transportation providers in 2023 compared to 2022.

Investing activities. Net cash flow from operationsused in investing activities was $42.3 million in 2023 compared to $111.8 million in 2022. The change in cash used in investing activities was driven by net incomea decrease in cash used for acquisitions of $53.8$78.8 million, primarily due to the Company's acquisitions of GMM and $89.8an asset acquisition in 2022.

Financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $113.1 million respectively, non-cash adjustments to reconcile net incomein 2023 compared to net cash provided by operatingfinancing activities of negative $11.1 million and negative $32.9 million, respectively, and changes in working capital of $12.3 million and negative $15.2 million, respectively.

The change in non-cash adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to the impact of:

the disposition of HA Services, resulting in decreased gain on sale of business, depreciation, amortization and deferred taxes in 2017 as compared to 2016;
the asset impairment charge incurred in 2016 of $21.0 million;
the impact on deferred taxes as a result of the Tax Reform Act passed in 2017;
the gain on sale of Mission Providence of $12.4$3.8 million in 2017; and
the impact of the change in equity in net (gain) loss of investees, which was a gain of $12.1 million in 2017 as compared to a loss of $10.3 million in 2016.

The change in working capital was primarily driven by the following:


Accounts receivable generated a cash inflow in 2017 of $5.7 million as compared to an outflow of $19.3 million in 2016.2022. The increase in cash inflow of $25.0 millionprovided by financing activities in 2023 was primarily attributable to NET Services due to the timinga result of collections as well as an outflowproceeds from our short-term borrowing on our New Credit Facility of $3.1$113.8 million of HA Services in 2016. These changes were partially offset by cash outflows in 2017 related to an increase in WD Services’ receivables in Germany, Saudi Arabia, South Korea and the UK.
Prepaid expenses and other generated a cash inflow of $15.5 million in 2017, as compared to a cash outflow of $4.1 million in 2016. The increase in cash inflow of $19.5 million was primarily attributable to a decrease in other receivables related to amounts receivable from insurance carriers in respect to certain claims paid by the Company, but reimbursable from the respective insurance carrier, decreased receivables related to our captive insurance company insurance policy rewrite, decreased prepaid value added taxes in the UK, decreased prepayments in WD Services in relation to certain contracts and changes in income tax payments.
Accounts payable and accrued expenses generated a cash outflow of $9.1 million in 2017, as compared to a cash inflow of $33.4 million in 2016. The decrease in cash inflow of $42.4 million is due primarily to the impact of NET Services accrued contract payments of $21.5 million, as well as the disposition of HA Services, which generated a cash inflow of $10.6 million in 2016. Partially offsetting these impacts is the impact of the increase in the accrued settlement related to our former Human Services segment of $9.0 million during 2017 as compared to an increase of $6.0 million in 2016.
Accrued transportation costs of NET Services generated a cash inflow of $11.2 million in 2017, as compared to a cash inflow of $8.7 million in 2016. The increase in cash inflow of $2.6 million is due primarily to the timing of payments to NET Services transportation providers and increased volume.
Income taxes payable on sale of business for 2016 includes a cash outflow of $30.2 million related to the sale of our Human Services segment.

Investing activities. Net cash provided by investing activities of $0.8 million in 2017 decreased by $323.1 million as compared to 2016. The decrease was primarily attributable to $371.6 million of proceeds on the Matrix Transaction recorded in 2016, which was partially offset by the impact of $15.6 million inno proceeds from the sale of our equity investment in Mission Providence in 2017. Additionally in 2017, we made a cost method investment in Circulation, a technology-based service provider, for $3.0 million. There was also a decrease in funding of our equity investment in Mission Providence of $13.7 million and a decrease in the purchase of property and equipment of $21.3 million. 2016 included purchases of property and equipment of $9.2 million by our discontinued operations.debt or other short-term borrowings during 2022.


Financing activities. Net cash used in financing activities of $33.8 million in 2017 decreased $343.0 million as compared to 2016. During 2016, there was a net repayment of debt of $305.0 million, primarily related to the repayment of debt upon the completion of the Matrix Transaction. Additionally, during 2017, we repurchased $41.0 million less of our Common Stock than in 2016. In addition, there was a decrease in proceeds from Common Stock issued pursuant to stock option exercises of $2.2 million.

20162022 cash flows compared to 20152021


Operating activities. Cash provided by operating activities was $41.8 millionFor a comparison of our cash flows for 2016, an increase2022 to 2021, see “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of $25.7 million comparedFinancial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, filed with 2015. 2016the SEC on March 7, 2023.

Obligations and 2015 cash flow from operations was driven by net income of $89.8 million and $83.2 million, respectively, non-cash adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities of negative $32.9 million and negative $1.2 million, respectively, and changes in working capital of negative $15.2 million and negative $65.9 million, respectively. The change in adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities was due primarily tocommitments

Senior Unsecured Notes. On November 4, 2020, the impact of the disposition of HA Services in 2016 and Human Services in 2015, as well as, significant stock-based compensation in 2015 and an asset impairment charge in 2016. The change in working capital is primarily driven by the following:
Accounts receivable generated a cash outflow for 2016 of $19.3 million as compared to an outflow of $86.6 million for 2015. The decrease in cash outflow of $67.3 million was primarily attributable to timing of significant receivable collections of NET Services, increases in WD Services accounts receivable in 2015 related to additional revenue contracts in place during 2015 as compared to 2014, and a cash outflow related to Human Services in 2015.
Accounts payable and accrued expenses generated a cash inflow of $33.4Company issued $500.0 million in 2016, as compared to a cash outflowaggregate principal amount of $21.95.875% senior unsecured notes due on November 15, 2025 (the “Senior Notes due 2025”). Subsequently, on August 24, 2021, the Company issued an additional $500.0 million in 2015.aggregate principal amount of 5.000% senior unsecured notes due on October 1, 2029 (the “Senior Notes due 2029” and, together with the Senior Notes due 2025, the “Notes”). The increase in cash flowSenior Notes due 2025 and the Senior Notes due 2029 were issued pursuant to two indentures, dated November 4, 2020 and August 24, 2021, respectively, between the Company and The Bank of $55.3 million was primarily attributable to our Human Services segment activity included in 2015, but not in 2016, due to the sale effective November 1, 2015,New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as well as a decreased change in accrued compensation between periods.
Deferred revenue generated a cash outflow of $4.0 million in 2016, as compared to a cash inflow of $19.0 million in 2015.trustee. The significant cash inflow in 2015 primarily related to WD Services in association with cash received in advance of services being rendered for two large contracts.


Income taxes payable on sale of business for 2016 includes a cash outflow of $30.2 million related to the sale of our Human Services segment.

Investing activities. Net cash provided by investing activities of $323.9 million in 2016 increased by $180.6 million as compared to 2015. The increase was primarily attributable to $371.6 million of proceeds on the Matrix Transaction recorded in 2016, which was partially offset by the impact of $199.9 million in proceeds from the sale of our Human Services segment in 2015. There was also an increase in the purchase of property and equipment of $6.1 million from 2015Senior Notes due 2025 were used to 2016.

Financing activities. Net cash used in financing activities of $376.8 million in 2016 increased $142.7 million as compared to 2015. During 2016, there wasfund a net repayment of debt of $305.0 million, primarily related to the repayment of debt upon the completion of the Matrix Transaction, compared to a net repayment of debt of $271.1 million in 2015 upon the sale of our Human Services segment. Additionally, during 2016, we repurchased $33.5 million more of our Common Stock than in 2015. 2015 includes $80.7 million received from the issuance of preferred stock as well as a contingent consideration payment of $7.5 million associated with our purchase of Ingeus UK Holdings Limited and its wholly and partly-owned subsidiaries and associates.

Obligations and commitments
CurrentCreditFacility
The Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility of $200.0 million, $25.0 million of which is available for letters of credit. As of December 31, 2017 we had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility and seven letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $11.1 million outstanding. At December 31, 2017, our available credit under the Credit Facility was $188.9 million. The Credit Facility matures on August 2, 2018.

Under the Credit Agreement, we have an option to request an increase in the amount of the revolving credit facility and/or the term loan facility from time to time (on substantially the same terms as apply to the existing facilities) in an aggregate amount of up to $75.0 million with either additional commitments from lenders under the Credit Agreement at such time or new commitments from financial institutions acceptable to the administrative agent in its reasonable discretion, so long as no default or event of default exists at the time of any such increase. We may not be able to access additional funds under this increase option as no lender is obligated to participate in any such increase under the Credit Facility.
We may prepay any outstanding principal under the Credit Facility in whole or in part, at any time without premium or penalty, subject to reimbursement of the lenders’ breakage and redeployment costs in connection with prepayments of London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, loans. The unutilized portion of the commitmentsCompany’s acquisition of Simplura and the proceeds from the Senior Notes due 2029 were used to fund a portion of the Company’s acquisition of VRI.

The Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company's future subordinated indebtedness, rank equally in right of payment with all of the Company's existing senior indebtedness, are effectively subordinated to any of the Company's existing and future secured indebtedness, including indebtedness under the New Credit Facility, may be irrevocably reduced or terminated by usto the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, and are structurally subordinated to all of the existing and future liabilities (including trade payables) of each of the Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries.

The Company will pay interest on the Notes at any time without penalty.
their applicable annual rates until maturity. Interest on the Senior Notes due 2025 is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year. Interest on the Senior Notes due 2029 is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year. Principal payments are not required until the maturity date on November 15, 2025 and October 1, 2029 when 100.0% of the outstanding principal amount of any loans accrues, at our election, at a per annum rate equal to LIBOR, plus an applicable margin or the base rate plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin ranges from 2.25% to 3.25% in the case of LIBOR loans and 1.25% to 2.25% in the case of the base rate loans, in each case, based on our consolidated leverage ratio as defined in the Credit Agreement. Interest on any loans is payable quarterly in arrears. In addition, we are obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee based on a percentage of the unused portion of each lender’s commitment under the Credit Facility and quarterly letter of credit fees based on a percentage of the maximum amount availablewill be required to be drawn under each outstanding letter of credit.repaid on the Senior Notes due 2025 and the Senior Notes due 2029, respectively.

New Credit Facility. The commitment feeCompany is party to the amended and letter ofrestated credit fee range from 0.25% to 0.50% and 2.25% to 3.25%, respectively, in each case, based on our consolidated leverage ratio.
The Credit Facility also requires us (subject to certain exceptions as set forth in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) to prepay the outstanding loans in an aggregate amount equal to 100% of the net cash proceeds received from certain asset dispositions, debt issuances, insurance and casualty awards and other extraordinary receipts.
The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. The negative covenants include restrictions on our ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, create liens, make investments, give guarantees, pay dividends, repurchase shares, sell assets, and merge and consolidate. We are subject to financial covenants, including consolidated net leverage and consolidated interest coverage covenants. The Company’s consolidated net leverage ratio may not be greater than 3.00:1.00agreement, dated as of February 3, 2022 (as amended, the end of any fiscal quarter and the Company’s consolidated interest coverage ratio may not be less than 3.00:1.00 as of the end of any fiscal quarter. We were in compliance"New Credit Agreement"), with all covenants as of December 31, 2017.

Our obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by all of our present and future domestic subsidiaries, excluding certain domestic subsidiaries, which includes our insurance captive. Our obligations under, and each guarantor’s obligations under its guaranty of, the Credit Facility are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of our respective assets, other than our


equity investment in Matrix, including a pledge of 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of our domestic subsidiaries, excluding our insurance captive, and 65% of the issued and outstanding stock of our first tier foreign subsidiaries.
Credit Facility Background
On August 2, 2013, we entered into the Credit Agreement withJPMorgan Chase Bank, of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and letteran issuing bank, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as an issuing bank, Truist Bank and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as co-syndication agents, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Bank of credit issuer, SunTrustAmerica, N.A., Regions Bank, Bank of Montreal and Capital One, National Association, as syndication agent, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporatedco-documentation agents, and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey,JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Truist Securities, Inc., and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint bookrunners and joint lead arrangers, and joint book managers andthe other lenders party
71


thereto. The New Credit Agreement provided usprovides the Company with a senior secured revolving credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) in an aggregate principal amount of $225.0 million, comprised of a $60.0 million term loan facility and a $165.0 million revolving credit facility.$325.0 million. The New Credit Facility includes sublimits for swingline loans, and letters of credit and alternative currency loans in amounts of up to $10.0$25.0 million, $60.0 million and $25.0$75.0 million, respectively. On August 2, 2013, we borrowedThe Company did not draw any amount of the entire amount availableNew Credit Facility at closing of the New Credit Agreement. At closing of the New Credit Agreement on February 3, 2022, the Company had $22.8 million of outstanding letters of credit under the term loan facilityNew Credit Facility. The proceeds of the New Credit Facility may be used (i) to finance working capital needs of the Company and $16.0 million underits subsidiaries and (ii) for general corporate purposes of the Company and its subsidiaries (including to finance capital expenditures, permitted acquisitions and investments).

The New Credit Agreement contains financial and non-financial covenants, including an affirmative covenant regarding our revolving credit facility and usedTotal Net Leverage Ratio, determined as of the proceeds thereof to refinance certainend of each of our existing indebtedness.
fiscal quarters, which is the ratio of (a) our total net indebtedness to (b) our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and certain non-recurring charges, fees and expenses, as set forth in the New Credit Agreement. On May 28, 2014, weJune 26, 2023, the Company entered into the first amendmentFirst Amendment to the New Credit Agreement (the “First Amendment”). The First Amendment providedto increase the maximum permitted Total Net Leverage Ratio for among other things, an increaseall fiscal quarters ending on or after June 30, 2023. As of December 31, 2023, we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the aggregate amount of theNew Credit Facility from $165.0 million to $240.0 millionAgreement and other modifications in connection with the consummation of the acquisition of Ingeus.our Total Net Leverage Ratio was 4.74:1.00.

On October 23, 2014, weFebruary 22, 2024, the Company entered into the Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”) to (i) add a new term loan tranche in aggregate principal amount of up to $250.0 million to partly finance the acquisition of Matrix and make certain other modifications in connection with the consummation of the acquisition of Matrix and (ii) add an excess cash flow mandatory prepayment provision.
On September 3, 2015, we entered into the Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Third Amendment”). Pursuant to the Third Amendment, the lenders under the Credit Agreement consented to Providence’s sale of the Human Services segment and certain other amendments to the terms of theNew Credit Agreement to reflect such consents.

On August 28, 2016, we entered intofurther increase the Fourthmaximum permitted Total Net Leverage Ratio for all fiscal quarters ending on or after December 31, 2024 as follows: for the fiscal quarters ending March 31, 2024 through June 30, 2024, 5.50:1.00; for the fiscal quarters ending September 30, 2024 through December 31, 2024, 5.25:1.00; for the fiscal quarters ending March 31, 2025 through September 30, 2025, 5.00:1.00; for the fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2025 through March 31, 2026, 4.75:1.00; and for all fiscal quarters ending after March 31, 2026, 4.50:1.00. The Second Amendment also includes a quarterly minimum liquidity covenant that restricts the Company from permitting its Liquidity (as defined in the Second Amendment and Consent (the “Fourth Amendment”)which is determined generally to be, as of any date of determination, the Credit Agreement. In accordance with the Fourth Amendment, which provided for the lenders’ consent to the Matrix Transaction, a portionsum of the net cash proceeds received by the Company in connection with the Matrix Transaction were applied to the prepayment of outstanding term loans and revolving loans. Additionally, effective following the repayment of the outstanding term loans in full on October 20, 2016, the Fourth Amendment further (i) reduced the aggregate revolving commitmentsCompany’s available borrowing capacity under the New Credit AgreementFacility plus the amount of its unencumbered cash), to $200.0be less than $100.0 million (ii) amended the consolidated net leverage ratio covenant such that the Company’s consolidated net leverage ratio may not be greater than 3.00:1.00 as of the endlast day of any fiscal quarter and (iii) replaced the existing consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio covenant with a covenant that the Company’s consolidated interest coverage ratio may not be less than 3.00:1.00 as of the end of anyeach fiscal quarter.

Rights Offering

We completed a rights offeringBased on February 5, 2015, allowing allour projections of financial performance, we expect to remain in compliance with the Company’s existing common stockholdersTotal Net Leverage Ratio covenant and the non-transferrable right to purchase their pro rata share of $65.5 million of Preferred Stock at a price equal to $100.00 per share (the “Rights Offering”). The Preferred Stock was convertible into shares of our Common Stock at a conversion price equal to $39.88, which wasminimum liquidity covenant as set forth in the closing price of our Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on October 22, 2014.
Stockholders exercised subscription rights to purchase 130,884 shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock. Pursuantsecond amendment to the terms and conditions ofNew Credit Agreement for the Standby Purchase Agreement between Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P., Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P. and Blackwell Partners, LLC (collectively, the “Standby Purchasers”) and the Company, the remaining 524,116 shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock was purchased by the Standby Purchasers at the $100.00 per share subscription price. The Standby Purchasers beneficially owned approximately 94% of our outstanding Preferred Stock after giving effecttwelve-month period subsequent to the Rights Offering and the Standby Purchase Agreement. The Company received $65.5 million in aggregate gross proceeds from the consummation of the Rights Offering and Standby Purchase Agreement, which it used to repay the related party unsecured subordinated bridge note that was outstanding as of December 31, 2014.
Additionally, on March 12, 2015, the Standby Purchasers exercised their right to purchase an additional 150,000 shares of the Company’s convertible preferred stock at a $105 per share subscription price.
We may pay a noncumulative cash dividend on each share of convertible preferred stock, when, as and if declared by a committee of our Board, at the rate of 5.5% per annum on the liquidation preference then in effect. Following the issue date of the convertible preferred stock,filing of this Annual Report. However, our assessment of our ability to meet our future obligations is inherently subjective, judgment-based, and susceptible to change based on or beforefuture events.

Our financial and operating performance, as well as our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to maintain compliance with covenants, are subject to certain risk factors; see Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further discussion.

For additional information related to the third business day immediately preceding each fiscal quarter, we determine ourCompany's New Credit Facility, refer to Note 11 of the Notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.



Insurance Programs
intention whether or not to pay a cash dividend with
With respect to that ensuing quarter and give notice of our intention to each holder of convertible preferred stock as soon as practicable thereafter.
In the event we do not declare and pay a cash dividend, the liquidation preference will be increased to an amount equal to the liquidation preference in effect at the start of the applicable dividend period, plus an amount equal to such then applicable liquidation preference multiplied by 8.5% per annum, computed on the basis of a 365-day year and the actual number of days elapsed from the start of the applicable dividend period to the applicable date of determination.
Cash dividends are payable quarterly in arrears on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year, and, if declared, will begin to accrue on the first day of the applicable dividend period. Payment in kind (“PIK”) dividends, if applicable, will accrue and be cumulative on the same schedule as set forth above for cash dividends and will also be compounded at the applicable annual rate on each applicable subsequent dividend date. PIK dividends are paid upon the occurrence of a liquidation event, conversion or redemption in accordance with the terms of the convertible preferred stock. Cash dividends were declared each quarter for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and totaled $4.4 million each year.
Reinsurance and Self-Funded Insurance Programs
Reinsurance
We historically reinsured a substantial portion of our automobile, general and professional liability and workers’ compensation costs under reinsurance programs primarily through ourCompany’s historical wholly-owned captive insurance company subsidiary, Social Services Providers Captive Insurance Company, or SPCIC.SPCIC, the operations with respect to which have been discontinued since 2017, the Company utilizes a report prepared by an independent actuary to estimate the gross expected losses related to historical automobile, general and professional and workers’ compensation liability reinsurance policies, including the estimated losses in excess of SPCIC’s insurance limits, which would be reimbursed to SPCIC to the extent such losses were incurred. As of May 16, 2017, SPCIC did not renew the expiring reinsurance policies. SPCIC will continue to resolve claims under the historical policy years.
At December 31, 2017,2023 and 2022, the cumulative reserveCompany had reserves of $20.2 million and $16.0 million, respectively, for expected losses since inception of these historicalthe automobile, general and professional liability and workers’ compensation reinsurance programs was $1.1 million, $0.7policies. The gross reserve as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 of $45.7 million and $5.0$37.1 million, respectively. Based on an independent actuarial report, our expected losses relatedrespectively, is classified as current liabilities and other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.  The estimated amount to workers’ compensation, automobile and general and professional liability in excessbe reimbursed to the Company as of our liability under our associated historical reinsurance programs at December 31, 20172023 and 2022 was $5.7 million. We recorded a corresponding receivable from third-party insurers$25.5 million and liability at December 31, 2017 for these expected losses, which would be paid by third-party insurers to$21.1 million, respectively, and is classified as other long-term assets in the extent losses are incurred.consolidated balance sheets.

Further, we had restricted cash of $6.3$0.6 million and $14.1$0.5 million at December 31, 20172023 and December 31, 2016,2022, respectively, which was primarily restricted to secure the reinsured claims losses under the historical automobile, general and professional liability and workers’ compensation reinsurance programs.


Health InsuranceLiquidity

Liquidity measures our ability to meet current and future cash flow needs on a timely basis and at a reasonable cost. We offermanage our NET Services, U.S. based WD Services, liquidity position to meet our daily cash flow needs, while maintaining an appropriate balance between assets
72


and corporate employees an optionliabilities to participate in self-funded health insurance programs. Additionally, we historically offered this option tomeet the return on investment objectives of our HA Services and Human Services segments’ employees. During the year ended December 31, 2017, health claims were self-funded with a stop-loss umbrella policy with a third-party insurer to limit the maximum potential liability for individual claims generally to $275,000 per person, subject to an aggregating stop-loss limitshareholders. Our liquidity position is supported by management of $400,000. In addition, the program has a total stop-loss limit for total claims, in order to limit our exposure to catastrophic claims.

Health insurance claims are paid as they are submitted to the plan administrator. We maintain accruals for claims that have been incurred but not yet reported to the plan administrator, and therefore, have not been paid. The incurred but not reported reserve is based on an established capliquid assets and current payment trendsliabilities and access to alternative sources of health insurance claims. The liability for the self-funded health planfunds. Liquid assets included cash of $2.2 million and $3.0accounts receivable, contract receivables, and other receivables of $375.1 million as of December 31, 20172023. Current liabilities, which totaled $706.6 million at year end as detailed in the table below, included $74.0 million in guarantees and 2016, respectively, was recordedletters of credit that are not expected to be paid in “Reinsurance liabilitycash in the next 12 months. Other sources of liquidity include amounts currently available under our New Credit Facility and related reserve” inexpected future cash generated from operations. As of December 31, 2023, we had amounts currently available under our consolidated balance sheets.

We charge our employees a portionNew Credit Facility of the costs of our self-funded group health insurance programs. We determine this charge at the beginning of each plan year based upon historical and projected medical utilization data. Any difference between our projections and our actual experience is borne by us, up to the stop-loss limit. We estimate potential obligations for liabilities under this program to reserve what we believe to be a sufficient amount to cover liabilitiesapproximately $61.0 million based on our past experience. Any significant increaseTotal Net Leverage Ratio of 5.00:1.00 as in effect for the quarter ended December 31, 2023.

We believe that, based on our current forecasts, the cash generated by our operations, amounts available under our New Credit Agreement and our current liquid assets will continue to be sufficient to fund our operations and growth strategies for the next twelve months. Our assessment is based on assumptions that may prove to be incorrect, and our operating projections, including our projected cash generated by our operations, may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us.

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Subtopic 205-40, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern, we have evaluated whether there are conditions and events, considered in the numberaggregate, that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the consolidated financial statements are issued. As of claims or costs associated with claims made underthe date of this programAnnual Report, we do not believe that substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern. While we believe we have sufficient liquidity to meet our cash obligations for the next twelve months as further discussed above, what we reserve could have a material adverse effectnote that the Notes due 2025, which mature in November 2025 and are classified as long-term debt on our financial results.balance sheet as of December 31, 2023, will become current liabilities beginning in November 2024 and payable within twelve months of such time, which could lead to substantial doubt being raised at that time. Accordingly, we expect that we will need to raise additional capital to repay or refinance this debt prior to its maturity date. Our ability to raise additional capital, including to repay or refinance the Notes due 2025, is subject to certain risk factors; see Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further discussion.


In the ordinary course of business we have entered into contractual obligations and have made other commitments to make future payments. Our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements are primarily to fund on-going operations. These liquidity requirements are met primarily through cash flow from operations, debt financing, and borrowings under our New Credit Facility. For additional information regarding our operating, investing and financing cash flows, see “Consolidated Financial Statements—Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows,” included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.


ContractualThe Company has cash obligations.
requirements of $706.6 million due in one year or less in addition to $1,218.7 million due in more than one year as of December 31, 2023. The following is a summary of our future contractual cash obligationsrequirements for the next twelve months and the period extending beyond twelve months as of December 31, 2017:2023 (in thousands):

 At December 31, 2023
  Less thanGreater than
Total1 Year1 Year
Senior Unsecured Notes(1)
$1,000,000 $— $1,000,000 
Interest(1)
207,490 62,717 144,773 
Guarantees(2)
34,113 33,594 519 
Operating leases(3)
42,511 8,727 33,784 
Letters of credit(2)
40,409 40,409 — 
Contracts payable(4)
117,488 117,488 — 
Transportation costs(5)
97,245 97,245 — 
Deferred tax liabilities(6)
39,584 — 39,584 
Purchased service commitment(7)
49,500 49,500 — 
Short-term borrowings(8)
113,800 113,800 — 
Other current cash obligations(9)
183,142 183,142 — 
Total$1,925,282 $706,622 $1,218,660 
 
(1)See Note 11 of the Notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further detail of our Senior Unsecured Notes and the timing of expected future payments. Interest payments on our Senior Unsecured Notes are typically paid semi-annually in arrears and have been calculated
73


 
At December 31, 2017
 
 
Less than
1-3
3-5
After 5
Contractual cash obligations (000's)
Total
1 Year
Years
Years
Years
Capital Leases
$2,984

$2,400
 $584
 $
 $
Interest (1)
467

467
 
 
 
Purchased services commitments (2)
8,448

2,966
 5,482
 
 
Guarantees (3)
43,287

42,768
 519
 
 
Letters of credit (3)
11,074

11,074
 
 
 
Operating Leases (4)
62,092

20,875
 23,114
 14,164
 3,939
Total
$128,352

$80,550

$29,699

$14,164

$3,939
(1)Future interest payments have been calculated at the current rates as of December 31, 2017.
(2)Our purchase obligations represent the minimum obligations we have under agreements with certain of our vendors. These minimum obligations are less than our projected use for those periods. Payments may be more than the minimum obligations based on actual use.
(3)Guarantees and letters of credit (“LOCs”) are commitments that represent funding responsibilities that may require our performance in the event of third-party demands or contingent events. Guarantees include surety bonds we provide to certain customers to protect against potential non-delivery of our non-emergency transportation services. Of the outstanding balance of our stand-by LOCs, $11.1 million directly reduces the amount available to us from our Credit Facility. The surety bonds and LOC amounts in the above table represent the amount of commitment expiration per period.
(4)The operating leases are for office space and related office equipment. We account for these leases on a monthly basis. Certain leases contain periodic rent escalation adjustments and renewal options.

Other than the items described above, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangementsrates fixed as of December 31, 2017.2023. Interest payments on our short-term borrowings have been calculated by taking the expected borrowing on the New Credit Facility for the next twelve months at the interest rate of 9.6%

Stock repurchase programs
On November 4, 2015, our Board authorized us(2)Letters of credit (“LOCs”) are guarantees of potential payments to engage in a repurchase programthird parties under certain conditions. Guarantees include surety bonds we provide to repurchase upcertain customers to $70.0 million in aggregate valueprotect against potential non-delivery of our Common Stock duringnon-emergency transportation services. Our LOCs shown in the twelve-month period following November 4, 2015. This plan terminated on November 3, 2016. A totaltable were provided by our New Credit Facility and reduced our availability thereunder. The surety bonds and LOC amounts in the above table represent the amount of 1,360,249 shares were purchased through this plancommitment expiration per period.
(3)The operating leases are for $63.0 million, excluding commission payments.
On October 26, 2016, our Board authorized usoffice space. Certain leases contain periodic rent escalation adjustments and renewal options. See Note 15 of the Notes to engagethe consolidated financial statements included in a repurchase program to repurchase up to $100.0 million in aggregate valuePart II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further detail of our Common Stock duringoperating leases.
(4)See Note 5 of the twelve-month period following October 26, 2016. As of October 26, 2017, we spent $30.4 million, excluding commission payments,Notes to purchase 770,808 sharesthe consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further detail of our Common Stock under this plan.contracts payable.

On November 2, 2017, the Board approved the extension(5)See Note 1 of the Company’s existing stock repurchase program, authorizingNotes to the Company to engageconsolidated financial statements included in a repurchase program to repurchase up to $69.6 million (the amount remaining from the $100.0 million repurchase amount authorized in 2016) in aggregate valuePart II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further detail of our Common Stock through December 31, 2018. Asaccrued transportation costs.
(6)See Note 16 of the Notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further detail of our deferred tax liabilities.
(7)The purchased service commitment includes the maximum penalty we would incur if we do not meet our minimum volume commitment over the remaining term of the agreement under certain contracts. See Note 17 of the Notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further detail of our purchased service commitment.
(8)Short-term borrowings shown in the table were provided by our New Credit Facility and reduced our availability under the related New Credit Agreement. See Note 11 of the Notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further detail of our New Credit Facility and current borrowings under the New Credit Facility.
(9)These include other current liabilities reflected in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017, 180,270 shares were purchased2023, including accounts payable and accrued expenses as detailed at Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.

Our primary sources of funding include operating cash flows, available borrowing capacity under this plan for $10.5 million, excluding commission payments, after it was extended on November 2, 2017.the New Credit Facility and access to capital markets. In addition, duringthere are statutory, regulatory, and debt covenant limitations that affect our ability to access the period January 1, 2018capital market for funds. Management believes that such limitations will not impact our ability to March 5, 2018,meet our ongoing short-term cash obligations. Management continuously monitors our liquidity position and adjustments are made to the Company repurchased an additional 527,825 shares for $33.3 million,balance between sources and $25.8 million was available under the planuses of funds as deemed appropriate. Our management is not aware of any events that are reasonably likely to repurchase shares.have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, capital resources, or operations. In addition, our management is not aware of any regulatory recommendations regarding liquidity, which if implemented, would have a material adverse effect on us.

Purchases under the repurchase program may be made from time-to-time through a combination of open market repurchases (including Rule 10b5-1 plans), privately negotiated transactions, and accelerated share repurchase transactions, at the discretion of our officers, and as permitted by securities laws, covenants under existing bank agreements, and other legal requirements.




Off-balance sheet arrangements

As of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have beenwere established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
  
New Accounting Pronouncements
The new accounting pronouncements that impact our business are included in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements, to our consolidated financial statements and are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 
Foreign currency
Interest rate risk

AsWe have exposure to interest rate risk mainly related to our New Credit Facility, which has variable interest rates that may increase. We had $113.8 million of short-term borrowings outstanding on the New Credit Facility and $40.4 million of outstanding letters of credit under the New Credit Facility at December 31, 2023. Interest rates on the outstanding principal amount of the New Credit Facility vary and accrue at a per annum rate equal to the Alternate Base Rate, the Adjusted Term SOFR Rate, the Adjusted Daily Simple SOFR Rate, the Adjusted EURIBOR Rate or the Adjusted Daily Simple SONIA Rate, as applicable and each as defined in the New Credit Agreement, in each case, plus an applicable margin. We completed an interest rate risk sensitivity analysis with the assumption that the short-term borrowing amount that was outstanding as of December 31, 2017, we conducted business2023 was outstanding for the fiscal year with an assumed one-percentage point increase in 10 countries outsideinterest rates. Based on this analysis, the U.S. As such, our cash flows and earnings are subject to fluctuations from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We do not currently hedge against the possible impact of currency fluctuations. For 2017, we generated $288.5 million of our net operating revenues from operations outside the U.S.
A 10% reduction in the foreign currency exchange rate from British Pounds to U.S. dollarsone-percentage point increase would have a $18.8an approximate $1.1 million negative impact on consolidated revenue, and a negligible impact on net income. A 10% reduction in other foreign currency exchange rates would not have a significant impact on our financial results.pre-tax earnings.
74
We assess the significance of foreign currency risk on a periodic basis and may implement strategies to manage such risk as we deem appropriate.





Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
 
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

75



Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the registrant, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. We designed our internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. The Company conducts periodic evaluations of its internal controls to enhance, where necessary, its procedures and controls.
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control–Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on such evaluation, the Company concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting which is presented in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 



To the stockholdersStockholders and boardBoard of directorsDirectors
The Providence Service Corporation:ModivCare Inc.:


Opinion on theConsolidated Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Providence Service CorporationModivCare Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)Company) as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2023, and the related notes, and financial statement schedule II (collectively, the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements). In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditors, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2023, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March 9, 2018February 23, 2024 expressed an unqualifiedadverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


We did not audit the financial statements of Mercury Parent, LLC (a 46.643.6 percent owned investee company) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2021. The Company’s investment in Mercury Parent, LLC at December 31, 2017 was $169.7 million, and its equity in net gainloss of Mercury Parent, LLC was $13.4$53.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. The financial2021. Those statements of Mercury Parent, LLC were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Mercury Parent, LLC is based solely on the reportreports of the other auditors.


Basis for Opinion


These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide and the report of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Sufficiency of audit evidence over certain capitated contracts with provisions for reconciliations, risk corridors or profit rebates

As discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements the Company reported service revenue, net of $2,751.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, which included revenue from certain capitated contracts with provisions for reconciliations, risk corridors or profit rebates. The Company records revenue for certain capitated contracts with provisions for reconciliations, risk corridors or profit rebates based on capitated payments received
76


during the month of service and these payments are reconciled based on actual cost and/or trip volume which may result in additional receivables from or payables to the payors. As of December 31, 2023, the Company recorded reconciliation and risk corridor contract receivables of $144.0 million and total contract payables of $117.5 million which included contract payables related to contracts with provisions for reconciliations, risk corridors or profit rebates.

We identified the evaluation of the sufficiency of audit evidence over certain capitated contracts with provisions for reconciliations, risk corridors, or profit rebates as a critical audit matter. Challenging auditor judgement was required in evaluating the sufficiency of audit evidence due to the large volume of data and complexity of the manually maintained information used in the revenue recognition process. Specialized skills and knowledge were needed to assess the Information Technology (IT) systems used to determine and record revenue, contract receivables and contract payables related to these capitated contracts.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We applied auditor judgment to determine the nature and extent of procedures to be performed over reconciliation, risk corridor and profit rebate contract revenue, contract receivables and contract payables. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the revenue recognition process related to the aforementioned capitated contracts. We assessed recorded reconciliation, risk corridor and profit rebate contract revenue, contract receivables and contract payables for the aforementioned capitated contracts by comparing a selection of such revenue amounts to third party contracts and cash receipts and comparing a selection of reconciliation, risk corridor or profit rebate revenue, receivable and payable amounts to payor contracts and transportation cost data. Additionally, we compared a selection of reconciliation, risk corridor and profit rebate contract receivable and payable activity during the year to current year revenue activity and cash settlements. We involved IT professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in testing certain general IT controls and certain application controls used to determine and record revenue, contract receivables and contract payables related to the aforementioned capitated contracts. We evaluated the sufficiency of audit evidence obtained by assessing the results of procedures performed.

Goodwill impairment assessment for certain reporting units

As discussed in Notes 2 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually, and more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit might exceed its fair value. The Company estimates the fair value of each reporting unit using a blend of an income approach, utilizing a discounted cash flow method, and a market approach, utilizing the guideline public company method. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recognized goodwill impairment charges of $183.1 million. As of December 31, 2023, the goodwill balance was $785.6 million.

We identified the evaluation of the goodwill impairment assessment for certain reporting units as a critical audit matter. There was a high degree of subjective auditor judgment required in assessing the Company’s key assumptions used in the income approach to estimate fair value, specifically short-term projected revenue and the discount rate. Minor changes in these assumptions could have had a significant impact on the estimated fair value. Additionally, the audit effort associated with this estimate required specialized skills and knowledge.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the Company’s goodwill impairment assessment process, including controls over the short-term projected revenue and the discount rate assumptions. We evaluated the short-term projected revenues by comparing them to the historical results of the respective reporting unit, and to external economic data, including publicly available information for guideline public companies. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in evaluating the discount rate by independently calculating the weighted average cost of capital.


/s/ KPMG LLP


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2008.
Stamford, ConnecticutDenver, Colorado
March 9, 2018February 23, 2024





77


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Mercury Parent, LLC

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Mercury Parent, LLC and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, members' equity, and cash flows, for the year ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Tempe, Arizona
February 25, 2022

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2017.
78


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




To the stockholdersStockholders and boardBoard of directorsDirectors
The Providence Service Corporation:ModivCare Inc.:


Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


We have audited The Providence Service CorporationModivCare Inc. and subsidiaries’subsidiaries' (the “Company”)Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses, described below, on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,2023, and the related notes and financial statement schedule II (collectively, the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements), and our report dated March 9, 2018February 23, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.


A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses described below have been identified and included in management’s assessment:

The Company did not, with respect to its PCS segment, complete before year-end (i) an effective risk assessment to assess and confirm the effectiveness and implementation of the changes identified in its internal control environment related to recently deployed information technology (“IT”) systems and revision of the PCS revenue and payroll processes or (ii) the establishment of all mechanisms expected to be used to enforce accountability in the pursuit of objectives to establish and operate effective internal control over financial reporting.

As a consequence:

The Company did not establish effective general information technology controls (“GITCs”), specifically change management controls and logical access controls, that support the consistent operation of all of the Company’s IT systems, resulting in automated process-level controls and manual controls dependent upon information derived from those IT systems to be ineffective because they could have been adversely impacted; and

The Company did not design, implement, and effectively operate process-level control activities related to its revenue processes (including service revenue and accounts receivable) and payroll processes (including payroll expenses recorded within service expense and general and administrative expense) within the PCS segment.

The material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2023 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion


The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’sManagement's Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
79


effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Stamford, ConnecticutDenver, Colorado
March 9, 2018

February 23, 2024


The Providence Service Corporation
80


ModivCare Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands except share and per share data)
 December 31,
 20232022
Assets  
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents$2,217 $14,451 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $969 and $2,078, respectively222,537 223,210 
Contract receivables143,960 71,131 
Other receivables8,616 2,506 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets27,028 34,332 
Restricted cash565 524 
Total current assets404,923 346,154 
Property and equipment, net85,629 69,138 
Goodwill785,554 968,654 
Payor network, net330,738 391,980 
Other intangible assets, net30,197 47,429 
Equity investment41,531 41,303 
Operating lease right-of-use assets39,776 39,405 
Other assets48,927 40,209 
Total assets$1,767,275 $1,944,272 
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity  
Current liabilities:  
Accounts payable$55,241 $54,959 
Accrued contract payables117,488 194,287 
Accrued transportation costs97,245 96,851 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities127,901 135,860 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities8,727 9,640 
Short-term borrowings113,800 — 
Total current liabilities520,402 491,597 
Long-term debt, net of deferred financing costs of $16,243 and $24,775, respectively983,757 979,361 
Deferred tax liabilities39,584 57,236 
Operating lease liabilities, less current portion33,784 32,088 
Other long-term liabilities33,553 29,434 
Total liabilities1,611,080 1,589,716 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)
Stockholders’ equity  
Common stock: Authorized 40,000,000 shares; $0.001 par value; 19,775,041 and 19,729,923, respectively, issued and outstanding (including treasury shares)20 20 
Additional paid-in capital450,945 444,255 
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)(24,437)180,023 
Treasury shares, at cost, 5,571,004 and 5,573,529 shares, respectively(270,333)(269,742)
Total stockholders’ equity156,195 354,556 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$1,767,275 $1,944,272 
 December 31,
 2017 2016
Assets   
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$95,310
 $72,262
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $5,762 in 2017 and $5,901 in 2016158,926
 162,115
Other receivables5,759
 12,639
Prepaid expenses and other35,243
 37,895
Restricted cash1,091
 3,192
Total current assets296,329
 288,103
Property and equipment, net50,377
 46,220
Goodwill121,668
 119,624
Intangible assets, net43,939
 49,124
Equity investments169,912
 161,363
Other assets12,028
 8,397
Restricted cash, less current portion5,205
 10,938
Deferred tax asset4,632
 1,510
Total assets$704,090
 $685,279
Liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity   
Current liabilities:   
Current portion of long-term obligations$2,400
 $1,721
Accounts payable15,404
 22,177
Accrued expenses103,838
 102,381
Accrued transportation costs83,588
 72,356
Deferred revenue17,381
 20,522
Reinsurance and related liability reserves4,319
 8,639
Total current liabilities226,930
 227,796
Long-term obligations, less current portion584
 1,890
Other long-term liabilities21,386
 22,380
Deferred tax liabilities41,627
 57,973
Total liabilities290,527
 310,039
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
 
Redeemable convertible preferred stock   
Convertible preferred stock, net: Authorized 10,000,000 shares; $0.001 par value; 803,200 and 803,398 issued and outstanding; 5.5%/8.5% dividend rate77,546
 77,565
Stockholders' equity   
Common stock: Authorized 40,000,000 shares; $0.001 par value; 17,473,598 and 17,315,661 issued and outstanding (including treasury shares)17
 17
Additional paid-in capital313,955
 302,010
Retained earnings204,818
 156,718
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax(25,805) (33,449)
Treasury shares, at cost, 4,126,132 and 3,478,676 shares(154,803) (125,201)
Total Providence stockholders' equity338,182
 300,095
Noncontrolling interest(2,165) (2,420)
Total stockholders' equity336,017
 297,675
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity$704,090
 $685,279




See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

statements.

81
The Providence Service Corporation


ModivCare Inc.
Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations
(in thousands except share and per share data)
 Year ended December 31,
 202320222021
Service revenue, net$2,751,170 $2,504,393 $1,996,892 
Grant income (Note 2)5,037 7,351 5,441 
Operating expenses:   
Service expense2,304,218 2,032,074 1,584,298 
General and administrative expense304,564 322,171 271,674 
Depreciation and amortization104,271 100,415 56,998 
Impairment of goodwill183,100 — — 
Total operating expenses2,896,153 2,454,660 1,912,970 
Operating income (loss)(139,946)57,084 89,363 
Interest expense, net69,120 61,961 49,081 
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity method investment(209,066)(4,877)40,282 
Income tax benefit (provision)4,319 3,035 (8,617)
Equity in net income (loss) of investee, net of tax287 (29,964)(38,250)
Net loss$(204,460)$(31,806)$(6,585)
Loss per common share:   
Basic$(14.43)$(2.26)$(0.47)
Diluted$(14.43)$(2.26)$(0.47)
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:   
Basic14,173,957 14,061,839 14,054,060 
Diluted14,173,957 14,061,839 14,054,060 
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
82
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Service revenue, net$1,623,882
 $1,578,245
 $1,478,010
      
Operating expenses:     
Service expense1,489,044
 1,452,110
 1,381,154
General and administrative expense72,336
 69,911
 70,986
Asset impairment charge
 21,003
 
Depreciation and amortization26,469
 26,604
 23,998
Total operating expenses1,587,849
 1,569,628
 1,476,138
Operating income36,033
 8,617
 1,872
      
Other expenses:     
Interest expense, net1,278
 1,583
 1,853
Other income(5,363) 
 
Equity in net (gain) loss of investees(12,054) 10,287
 10,970
Gain on sale of equity investment(12,377) 
 
Loss (gain) on foreign currency transactions345
 (1,375) (857)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes64,204
 (1,878) (10,094)
Provision for income taxes4,401
 17,036
 14,583
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax59,803
 (18,914) (24,677)
Discontinued operations, net of tax(5,983) 108,760
 107,871
Net income53,820
 89,846
 83,194
Net (gain) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests(451) 2,082
 502
Net income attributable to Providence$53,369
 $91,928
 $83,696
      
Net income available to common stockholders (Note 14)$41,865
 $74,374
 $67,999
      
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:     
Continuing operations$3.52
 $(1.45) $(1.83)
Discontinued operations(0.44) 6.52
 6.09
Basic earnings per common share$3.08
 $5.07
 $4.26
      
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:     
Continuing operations$3.50
 $(1.45) $(1.83)
Discontinued operations(0.44) 6.52
 6.09
Diluted earnings per common share$3.06
 $5.07
 $4.26
      
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:     
Basic13,602,140
 14,666,896
 15,960,905
Diluted13,673,314
 14,666,896
 15,960,905


ModivCare Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)

 Year ended December 31,
 202320222021
Operating activities   
Net loss$(204,460)$(31,806)$(6,585)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:   
Depreciation25,038 20,055 12,747 
Amortization79,233 80,360 44,251 
Stock-based compensation6,456 6,872 5,904 
Deferred income taxes(17,652)(36,663)(17,691)
Impairment of goodwill183,100 — — 
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount5,246 5,125 2,730 
Other assets(8,719)(17,987)(2,128)
Equity in net loss (income) of investee(398)40,916 53,092 
Reduction of right-of-use assets12,344 11,640 11,330 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:   
Accounts receivable and other receivables(5,268)(9,130)(24,993)
Contract receivables(72,828)(46,651)11,244 
Prepaid expenses and other assets6,830 6,416 (5,459)
Accrued contract payables(76,798)(87,299)107,698 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(7,677)57,249 (16,795)
Accrued transportation costs394 (6,443)23,620 
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities(7,812)(3,096)(12,125)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities(82,971)(10,442)186,840 
Investing activities   
Purchase of property and equipment(42,288)(33,004)(21,316)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired— (78,809)(664,309)
Net cash used in investing activities(42,288)(111,813)(685,625)
Financing activities   
Net proceeds from short-term borrowings113,800 — — 
Proceeds from long-term debt— — 500,000 
Repurchase of common stock, for treasury— — (39,994)
Payment of debt issuance costs(376)(2,415)(13,486)
Proceeds from common stock issued pursuant to stock option exercise31 6,789 3,227 
Restricted stock surrendered for employee tax payment(899)(792)(896)
Other financing activities510 226 — 
Net cash provided by financing activities113,066 3,808 448,851 
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(12,193)(118,447)(49,934)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year14,975 133,422 183,356 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year$2,782 $14,975 $133,422 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
83


ModivCare Inc.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
(in thousands)

 Year ended December 31,
202320222021
Supplemental cash flow information
Cash paid for interest$64,200 $59,392 $32,178 
Cash paid for income taxes$9,078 $15,660 $13,021 
Assets acquired under operating leases$12,715 $7,295 $24,152 
Acquisitions:   
Purchase price$— $79,200 $678,655 
Less:   
Cash acquired— (391)(14,346)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired$— $78,809 $664,309 
 
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
84


ModivCare Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity 
(in thousands except share data)
Common StockAdditionalRetained EarningsTreasury Stock
 SharesAmountPaid-In Capital(Accumulated Deficit)SharesAmountTotal
Balance at December 31, 202019,570,598 $20 $421,318 $218,414 5,287,283 $(228,141)$411,611 
Net loss— — — (6,585)— — (6,585)
Stock-based compensation— — 5,663 — — — 5,663 
Exercise of employee stock options51,798 — 3,227 — — — 3,227 
Restricted stock forfeited(34,472)— — — — — — 
Restricted stock surrendered for employee tax payment— — — — 5,432 (896)(896)
Shares issued for bonus settlement and director stipends1,498 — 241 — — — 241 
Stock repurchase plan— — — — 276,268 (39,994)(39,994)
Balance at December 31, 202119,589,422 $20 $430,449 $211,829 5,568,983 $(269,031)$373,267 
Net loss— — — (31,806)— — (31,806)
Stock-based compensation— — 6,491 — — — 6,491 
Exercise of employee stock options109,731 — 6,789 — — — 6,789 
Restricted stock issued27,251 — — — — — — 
Restricted stock surrendered for employee tax payment— — — — 7,486 (792)(792)
Shares issued for bonus settlement and director stipends3,519 — 340 — — — 340 
Shares issued for ESPP— — 186 — (2,940)81 267 
Balance at December 31, 202219,729,923 $20 $444,255 $180,023 5,573,529 $(269,742)$354,556 
Net loss— — — (204,460)— — (204,460)
Stock-based compensation— — 6,061 — — — 6,061 
Exercise of employee stock options549 — 31 — — — 31 
Restricted stock issued37,609 — — — — — — 
Restricted stock surrendered for employee tax payment— — — — 10,565 (899)(899)
Shares issued for bonus settlement and director stipends6,960 — 316 — — — 316 
Shares issued for ESPP— — 282 — (13,090)308 590 
Balance at December 31, 202319,775,041 $20 $450,945 $(24,437)5,571,004 $(270,333)$156,195 

 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements


The Providence Service Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(in thousands)
statements.
85
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net income$53,820
 $89,846
 $83,194
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest(451) 2,082
 502
Net income attributable to Providence53,369
 91,928
 83,696
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax7,117
 (16,618) (8,075)
Reclassification of translation loss realized upon sale of equity investment527
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss)7,644
 (16,618) (8,075)
Comprehensive income61,464
 73,228
 75,119
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest(255) 1,968
 508
Comprehensive income attributable to Providence$61,209
 $75,196
 $75,627




































See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements



The Providence Service Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity 
(in thousands except share data)

       Retained 
Accumulated
Other
        
 Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-In
 
Earnings
(Accumulated
 
Comprehensive
Loss, Net of
 Treasury Stock 
Non-
Controlling
  
 Shares Amount Capital Deficit) Tax Shares Amount Interest Total
Balance at December 31, 201416,870,285
 $17
 $261,155
 $(13,366) $(8,756) 1,014,108
 $(17,686) $50
 $221,414
Stock-based compensation
 
 26,622
 
 
 
 
 
 26,622
Exercise of employee stock options, including net tax benefit of $2,706247,333
 
 7,899
 
 
 5,718
 (299) 
 7,600
Restricted stock issued65,447
 
 
 
 
 15,961
 (759) 
 (759)
Stock repurchase
 
 
 
 
 816,468
 (34,111) 
 (34,111)
Shares surrendered by employees to pay employee taxes related to shares released from escrow
 
 
 
 
 43,743
 (1,968) 
 (1,968)
Conversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock3,715
 
 150
 
 
 
 
 
 150
Beneficial conversion feature related to preferred stock
 
 1,071
 
 
 
 
 
 1,071
Convertible preferred stock dividends
 
 (2,814) (1,121) 
 
 
 
 (3,935)
Accretion of convertible preferred stock discount
 
 (1,071) 
 
 
 
 
 (1,071)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
 
 
 
 (8,075) 
 
 
 (8,075)
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (502) (502)
Net income attributable to Providence
 
 
 83,696
 
 
 
 
 83,696
Balance at December 31, 201517,186,780
 17
 293,012
 69,209
 (16,831) 1,895,998
 (54,823) (452) 290,132
Stock-based compensation
 
 5,154
 
 
 
 
 
 5,154
Exercise of employee stock options, including net tax benefit of $276105,788
 
 3,832
 
 
 
 
 
 3,832
Restricted stock issued22,793
 
 
 
 
 2,736
 (130) 
 (130)
Stock repurchase
 
 
 
 
 1,579,942
 (70,248) 
 (70,248)
Conversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock300
 
 12
 
 
 
 
 
 12
Convertible preferred stock dividends
 
 
 (4,419) 
 
 
 
 (4,419)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
 
 
 
 (16,618) 
 
 114
 (16,504)
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (2,082) (2,082)
Net income attributable to Providence
 
 
 91,928
 
 
 
 
 91,928
Balance at December 31, 201617,315,661
 17
 302,010
 156,718
 (33,449) 3,478,676
 (125,201) (2,420) 297,675
Stock-based compensation
 
 7,619
 
 
 
 
 
 7,619
Exercise of employee stock options91,400
 
 2,423
 
 
 5,665
 (238) 
 2,185
Restricted stock issued36,623
 
 
 
 
 19,556
 (878) 
 (878)
Performance restricted stock issued3,773
 
 (96) 
 
 
 
 
 (96)
Shares issued for bonus settlement and director stipends25,646
 
 1,107
 
 
 
 
 
 1,107
Stock repurchase
 
 
 
 
 622,235
 (28,486) 
 (28,486)
Conversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock495
 
 20
 (1) 
 
 
 
 19
Convertible preferred stock dividends
 
 
 (4,418) 
 
 
 
 (4,418)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
 
 
 
 7,117
 
 
 (196) 6,921
Reclassification of translation loss realized upon sale of equity investments
 
 
 
 527
 
 
 
 527
Noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 451
 451
Other
 
 22
 
 
 
 
 
 22
Net income attributable to Providence
 
 
 53,369
 
 
 
 
 53,369
Cumulative effect adjustment from change in accounting principle
 
 850
 (850) 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 201717,473,598
 $17
 $313,955
 $204,818
 $(25,805) 4,126,132
 $(154,803) $(2,165) $336,017

 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements


The Providence Service Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Operating activities     
Net income$53,820
 $89,846
 $83,194
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation18,542
 21,699
 20,234
Amortization7,927
 26,026
 38,067
Provision for doubtful accounts1,372
 3,759
 2,539
Stock-based compensation7,543
 5,136
 26,622
Deferred income taxes(22,996) (14,130) (10)
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount682
 1,754
 2,041
Write-off of deferred financing charges
 2,302
 
Gains on remeasurement of contingent consideration
 
 (2,469)
Asset impairment charge
 21,003
 1,593
Equity in net (gain) loss of investee(12,054) 10,287
 10,970
Gain on sale of equity investment(12,377) 
 
Gain on sale of business
 (167,895) (123,129)
Deferred income taxes and income taxes payable on gain on sale of business
 58,492
 22,797
Other non-cash charges (credits)296
 (1,323) (419)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:     
Accounts receivable5,715
 (19,332) (86,627)
Prepaid expenses and other15,457
 (4,058) 14,654
Reinsurance liability reserve(5,731) (4,110) (611)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(9,064) 33,365
 (21,900)
Income taxes payable on gain from sale of business
 (30,153) 
Accrued transportation costs11,232
 8,654
 9,045
Deferred revenue(4,691) (4,019) 19,043
Other long-term liabilities(629) 4,462
 463
Net cash provided by operating activities55,044
 41,765
 16,097
Investing activities     
Purchase of property and equipment(19,923) (41,216) (35,072)
Proceeds from sale of property
 1,039
 
Proceeds from sale of equity investment15,593
 
 
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
 
 (3,433)
Sale of business, net of cash sold
 371,580
 199,943
Purchase of equity investment
 (13,663) (16,072)
Purchase of cost method investments(3,000) 
 
Restricted cash for reinsured claims losses7,834
 5,926
 (2,058)
Other investing activities310
 239
 (18)
Net cash provided by investing activities814
 323,905
 143,290
Financing activities     
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs
 
 80,667
Preferred stock dividends(4,418) (4,419) (3,928)
Repurchase of common stock, for treasury(29,364) (70,378) (36,838)
Proceeds from common stock issued pursuant to stock option exercise1,921
 4,108
 4,894
Proceeds from long-term debt
 52,500
 34,000
Repayment of long-term debt
 (357,450) (305,125)
Payment of contingent consideration
 
 (7,496)
Other financing activities(1,927) (1,182) (286)
Net cash used in financing activities(33,788) (376,821) (234,112)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash978
 (1,357) (911)
Net change in cash23,048
 (12,508) (75,636)
Cash at beginning of period72,262
 84,770
 160,406
Cash at end of period$95,310
 $72,262
 $84,770
 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements


The Providence Service Corporation
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
(in thousands)

 Year ended December 31,
Supplemental cash flow information2017 2016 2015
      
Cash included in current assets of discontinued operations held for sale$
 $
 $5,014
Cash paid for interest$987
 $9,768
 $16,699
Cash paid for income taxes$18,128
 $55,827
 $21,555
Proceeds receivable from option exercise$562
 $
 $
Purchases of equipment in accounts payable and accrued liabilities$1,362
 $983
 $930
Accrued unfunded future equity investment capital contributions$
 $
 $4,654
Note receivable issued for sale of property$
 $3,130
 $
Purchase of equipment through capital lease obligation$1,474
 $4,547
 $
Acquisitions:     
Purchase price$
 $
 $
Less:     
Working capital adjustments to purchase price
 
 (3,433)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired$
 $
 $3,433






























See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements



The Providence Service CorporationModivCare Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2017
(in thousands except share and per share data)2023
 
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
 
Description of Business


The Providence Service Corporation (“we”,ModivCare Inc. ("ModivCare" or the “Company” or “Providence”"Company") owns subsidiaries and investments primarily engaged in the provision ofis a technology-enabled healthcare services incompany that provides a suite of integrated supportive care solutions for public and private payors and their members. Its value-based solutions address the United Statessocial determinants of health ("SDoH") by connecting members to essential care services. By doing so, ModivCare helps health plans manage risks, reduce costs, and workforce development services internationally. The subsidiaries and other investments in which the Company holds interests comprise the following segments:

Non-Emergency Transportation Services (“NET Services”) – Nationwide managerimprove health outcomes. ModivCare is a provider of non-emergency medical transportation (“NET”("NEMT") programs for state governments, personal care services ("PCS"), and managedremote patient monitoring solutions ("RPM"), which serve similar, highly vulnerable patient populations. The technology-enabled operating model in its NEMT segment includes the coordination of non-emergency medical transportation services supported by an infrastructure of core competencies in risk underwriting, contact center management, network credentialing and claims management. Additionally, its personal care organizations.services in its PCS segment include placements of non-medical personal care assistants, home health aides and nurses primarily to Medicaid patient populations in need of care monitoring and assistance performing daily living activities in the home setting. ModivCare’s remote patient monitoring solutions in its RPM segment include the monitoring of personal emergency response systems, vitals monitoring, medication management and data-driven patient engagement solutions.
Workforce Development Services (“WD Services”) – Global provider of employment preparation and placement services, legal offender rehabilitation services, youth community service programs and certain health related services to eligible participants of government sponsored programs.
Matrix Investment – MinorityModivCare also holds a 43.6% minority interest in CCHN Group Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which operate under the Matrix Medical Network brand (“Matrix”), a nationwide provider of in-home care optimization and management solutions, including comprehensive health assessments (“CHAs”), to members of managed care organizations, accounted for as an equity method investment. On February 16, 2018,. Matrix, acquired HealthFair, expanding its service offerings to include mobile health assessments, advanced diagnostic testing, and additional care optimization services.

In addition to its segments’ operations, thewhich is included in our Corporate and Other segment, includes the Company’s activities at its corporate office that include executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal, public reporting, certain strategicmaintains a national network of community-based clinicians who deliver in-home and corporate development functions and the results of the Company’s captive insurance company.on-site services.

Discontinued Operations

During the periods presented, the Company completed the following transactions, which resulted in the presentation of the operations as Discontinued Operations. On November 1, 2015, the Company completed the sale of its Human Services segment. In addition to the results through the sale date, the Company has recorded additional expenses related to legal proceedings as described in Note 18, Commitment and Contingencies, related to an indemnified legal matter. On October 19, 2016, affiliates of Frazier Healthcare Partners purchased a 53.2% equity interest in Matrix with Providence retaining a 46.8% equity interest (the “Matrix Transaction”). Prior to the closing of the Matrix Transaction, the financial results of Matrix were included in the Company’s Health Assessment Services (“HA Services”) segment.
Basis of Presentation
 
The Company follows accounting standards setestablished by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). The FASB establishes accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. References to GAAP issued by the FASB in these footnotesnotes are to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), which serves as athe single source of authoritative non-SEC accounting and applicable reporting standards to be applied byfor non-governmental entities. All amounts are presented in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.


The Company holds investments that are accountedaccounts for its investment in Matrix using the equity method. Themethod, as the Company does not control the decision-making process or business management practices of these affiliates.Matrix. While the Company has access to certain information and performs certain procedures to review the reasonableness of information, the Company relies on the management of these affiliatesMatrix to provide accurate financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. The Company receives audit reports relating to such financial information from the significant affiliates’Matrix’s independent auditors on an annual basis. The Company is not aware of any errors in or possible misstatements of the financial information provided by its equity affiliatesMatrix that would have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. See Note 6, Equity Investment, for further information.



Reclassifications
The Company hasReclassifications: Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified certain amounts relating to its prior period results to conform to current year presentation.

Liquidity

As of the issuance date of these consolidated financial statements, the Company expects its current period presentation.cash and cash equivalents of $2.2 million and accounts receivable, contract receivables, and other receivables of $375.1 million as of December 31, 2023, along with and cash flows from operations and amounts currently available under the New Credit Facility will be sufficient to fund its operating expenses and expenditure requirements for the next twelve months. This assessment is based on assumptions, and operating projections, including projected cash generated by operations, may change as a result of many factors currently unknown or unknowable to the Company. The Company does not currently have sufficient available cash flows to repay our Senior Notes due 2025 in full when due. Accordingly, the Company expects to be required to raise additional capital to repay or refinance this debt prior to its maturity date on November 15, 2025.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

On May 11, 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") declared the end of the public health emergency ("PHE") for the COVID-19 pandemic. While the Company has continued to experience increased trip volume, service hours, and patient visits each year following the pandemic, structural changes in the industry as a result of the pandemic,
86


as well as ongoing constraints on the labor market, specifically related to the strain on healthcare professionals, could continue to have an adverse impact on the Company's financial statements. The Company continues to actively monitor the structural changes to the industry and the impact these have on our business and results of operations with emphasis on protecting the health and safety of its employees, maximizing the availability of its services and products to support SDoH, and supporting the operational and financial stability of its business.

Federal, state, and local authorities have taken several actions designed to assist healthcare providers in providing care to COVID-19 and other patients and to mitigate the adverse economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Legislative actions taken by the federal government include the CARES Act and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 ("ARPA"). Through the CARES Act, the federal government has authorized payments to be distributed to healthcare providers through the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund ("Provider Relief Fund" or "PRF"). Through ARPA the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund ("SLFRF") was established to send relief payments to state and local governments impacted by the pandemic to assist with responding to the PHE including the economic hardships that continue to impact communities and to respond to workers performing essential work during the COVID-19 PHE, including providers. These funds are not subject to repayment; provided we are able to attest to and comply with any terms and conditions of such funding, as applicable. See discussion of grant income at Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements, for additional information on other reclassifications..

2. Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Principles of Consolidation
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include The Providence Service Corporation,ModivCare Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and entities it controls, or in which it has a variable interest and is the primary beneficiary of expected cash profits or losses. The Company records its investments in entities that it does not control, but over which it has the ability to exercise significant influence, using the equity method. The Company has eliminated significant intercompany transactions and accounts.

Accounting Estimates

The Company uses estimates and assumptions in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. These estimates and assumptions also affect the reported amount of net income or loss during any period. The Company’s actual financial results could differ significantly from these estimates. The significant estimates underlying the Company’s consolidated financial statements include revenue recognition; allowance for doubtful accounts; accrued transportation costs; accrued restructuring; income taxes; recoverability of current and long-lived assets, including equity method investments; intangible assets and goodwill; loss contingencies; accounting for business combinations, including amounts assigned to definite and indefinite lived intangibles and contingent consideration; and loss reserves for reinsurance and self-funded insurance programs;programs.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”) which establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy categorizes assets and stock-based compensation.liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1: Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices in active markets as of the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Significant Other Observable Inputs – inputs to the valuation methodology are based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3: Significant Unobservable Inputs – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. As of December 31, 2023
87


and 2022, the carrying amount for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable (net of allowance for credit losses), current assets and current liabilities was equal to or approximated fair value due to their short-term nature or proximity to current market rates. Fair values for our publicly traded debt securities are based on quoted market prices, when available. See Note 11, Debt, for the fair value of our long-term debt.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments with an initial maturity of three months or less. Investments in cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company places its temporary cash investments with high credit quality financial institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the federally insured limits.
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, $40,127 and $21,411, respectively, of cash was held in foreign countries. Such cash is generally used to fund foreign operations, although it may be used also to repay intercompany indebtedness or similar arrangements. As of December 31, 2017, cash held in foreign countries included approximately $15,593 of proceeds from the sale of the Company's joint venture Mission Providence Pty Ltd ("Mission Providence").


Restricted Cash

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had $6,296 and $14,130, respectively, of restricted cash:
 December 31,
 2017 2016
Collateral for letters of credit - Reinsured claims losses$
 $2,265
Escrow/Trust - Reinsured claims losses6,296
 11,865
Restricted cash for reinsured claims losses6,296
 14,130
Less current portion1,091
 3,192
Restricted cash, less current portion$5,205
 $10,938
Of the restrictedRestricted cash amount at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

$0 and $2,265, respectively, served as collateral for irrevocable standby letters of creditprimarily relates to secure any reinsured claims losses under the Company’s reinsurance program;


the remaining $6,296 and $11,865, respectively, is primarily related to restricted cashamounts held in trusts for reinsurance claims losses under the Company’s insurance operation for historical workers’ compensation, general and professional liability and auto liability reinsurance programs, as well as amounts restricted for withdrawal under our self-insured medical and benefits plans.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts


The Company records accounts receivable amounts at the contractual amount, less contractual revenue adjustments based on amounts expected to be due from payors and less an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts at an amount it estimates to be sufficient to cover the risk that an account will not be collected. The Company regularly evaluates itscollected due to credit risk. In order to establish the amount of the allowance related to the credit risk of accounts receivable, especiallythe Company considers information related to receivables that are past due, past loss experience, current and reassesses its allowance for doubtful accounts based on identified customer collection issues.forecasted economic conditions, and other relevant factors. In circumstances where the Company is aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligation, the Company records a specific allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce its net recognized receivable to an amount the Company reasonably expects to collect. TheAs the Company also provides a general allowance, based upon historical experience. Under certainprimarily contracts with Medicaid and Medicare governmental payors, the Company is not subject to significant credit risk in the collection of NET Services, final payment is based on a reconciliation of actual utilization and cost, and the final reconciliation may require a considerable period of time. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, accounts receivable under these reconciliation contracts totaled $42,054 and $45,287, respectively. In addition, certain government entities which WD Services serves remit payment substantially beyond the payment terms. The Company monitors these amounts due to the aging of receivables, but generally believes the balances are collectible. However, factors within those government entities could change and there can be no assurance that such changes would not result in an inability to collect the receivables.receivable.


The Company’s provision for doubtful accountsbad debt expense from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 20152021 was $1,372, $2,892$4.0 million, $2.7 million and $1,369,$1.7 million, respectively.

Business Combinations

The Company accounts for acquisitions in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. The acquisition method of accounting requires the Company to make significant estimates and assumptions as of the date of the acquisition related to the determination of the fair values (primarily Level 3) of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and related to the determination of estimated lives of the depreciable assets acquired. The Company recognizes goodwill at the amount by which the purchase price exceeds the fair value of identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed. See Note 3, Acquisitions, for further discussion of the Company’s acquisitions.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation, or at fair value if the assets were initially recorded as the result of a business combination or if the asset was remeasured due to an impairment. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset.asset to the Company. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Gains and losses resulting from the disposition of an asset are reflected in operating expense.results of operations.


Internal-use Software

The Company develops and implements software for internal use to enhance the performance and capabilities of the technology infrastructure. The costs incurred for the development of the internal-use software are capitalized when they meet the internal-use software capitalization criteria outlined in ASC 350-40. The capitalized costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, ranging from 3 to 10 years.

In addition to acquired software, the Company capitalizes costs associated with cloud computing arrangements (“CCA”) that are service contracts. The CCA includes services which are used to support certain internal corporate functions as well as technology associated with revenue-generating activities. The capitalized costs are amortized using the straight-line
88


method over the term of the related CCA. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, capitalized costs associated with CCA, net of accumulated amortization were $14.6 million and $11.9 million, respectively. The value of accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 was $5.2 million and $2.2 million, respectively. Amortization expense during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, totaled $2.9 million, $1.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

Recoverability of Goodwill

In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, the Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually, orand more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) the loss or modification of significant contracts, (2) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (3) unanticipated competition, (4) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, or (5) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price. We performIn connection with the 2023 annual assessment of goodwill, the Company changed the date of its annual assessment from October 1 to July 1.

When evaluating goodwill for impairment, test for all reporting units as of October 1.

First, we performthe Company first performs qualitative assessments for each reporting unit to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.value. If the qualitative assessment suggests that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, amount, then we performthe Company performs a quantitative assessment and comparecompares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value.

We adopted ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwillvalue and Other (Topic 350):Simplifyingto the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”) effective April 1, 2017. ASU 2017-04 removesextent the requirement to comparecarrying value is greater than the implied fair value, of goodwill with its carrying amountthe difference is recorded as part of step two of the goodwill impairment test. Instead, if we deem it necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test in an annual or interim period, we recognize an impairment charge equal toin the excess, if any,consolidated statements of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.operations.

The Company estimatesperformed a quantitative test comparing the carrying value of the Company's reporting units with their respective fair value. The fair value of the Company’sCompany's reporting units is estimated using either an income approach, a market valuation approach, a transaction valuation approach, or a blended approach. The income approach produces an estimated fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of the cash flows the Company expects the reporting unit to generate in the future. Estimates included in the discounted cash flow model are primarily Level 3 inputs and include the discount rate, which the Company determines based on adjusting an industry-wide weighted-average cost of capital for size, geography, risk free rates, and company specific risk factors, long-term rates of growth and profitability of the Company’s business, working capital effects and planned capital expenditures. The market approach produces an estimated fair value of a reporting unit based on a comparison of the reporting unit to comparable publicly traded entities in similar lines of business. The transaction valuation approach produces an estimated fair value of a reporting unit


based on a comparison of the reporting unit to publicly available transactional data involving both publicly traded and private entities in similar lines of business. The Company’s significant estimates in both the market and transaction approach include the selected similar companies with comparable business factors such as size, growth, profitability, risk and return on investment and the multiples the Company applies to revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit.

As discussed in Note 6, Goodwilla result of the Company's annual goodwill assessment, the Company recorded a $183.1 million impairment of goodwill within its PCS and Intangibles, theRPM reporting units. The Company determined that based on its qualitative assessment for each reporting unit, factors existed which required the Company to test its goodwill was impairedand indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. These factors included a decline in the WD Services segment duringmarket price of the year ended December 31, 2016,Company's common stock, industry specific regulatory pressures such as Medicaid redetermination and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") proposed ruling on Ensuring Access to Medicaid Services, and general economic and market volatility. As a result, the Company recorded an asset impairment charge relatedperformed a quantitative assessment using a blend of both the income approach and the market approach to estimate the fair value of the reporting units and determined that the goodwill at its goodwill of $5,224. The Company did not record any impairment chargesPCS and RPM reporting units was impaired. See Note 9, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company recorded $1,593 of impairment charges related to its Human Services segment during the year ended December 31, 2015, which is included in "Discontinued operations, net of tax" in the consolidated statements of income.additional details.

Recoverability ofIntangible Assets Subject to Amortization and Other Long-Lived Assets

Intangible assets subject to amortization and other long-lived assets are carried at cost and are amortized or depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 52 to 15 years. In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, the Company reviews the carrying value of long-lived assets or groups of assets to be used in operations whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may be impaired. Factors that may necessitate an impairment assessment include, among others, significant adverse changes in the extent or manner in which an asset or group of assets is used, significant adverse changes in legal factors or the business climate that could affect the value of an asset or group of assets or significant declines in the observable market value of an asset or group of assets. The presence or occurrence of those events indicates that an asset or group of assets may be impaired. In those cases, the Company assesses the recoverability of an asset or group of assets by determining whether the carrying value of the asset or group of assets exceeds the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets over the remaining economic life of the asset or the primary asset in the group of assets. If such testing indicates the carrying value of the asset or group of assets is not recoverable, the Company estimates the fair value of the asset or group of assets using appropriate valuation methodologies, which would typically include an estimate of discounted cash flows. If the fair value of
89


those assets or groups of assets is less than carrying value, the Company records an impairment loss equal to the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value. As discussed in Note 6, Goodwill and Intangibles, the Company determined that the WD Services segment’s intangible assets and property and equipment were impaired during the year ended December 31, 2016, and the Company recorded asset impairment charges of $9,983 and $4,381 to property and equipment and customer relationship intangible assets, respectively. The Company did not record any impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2015.


Accrued Transportation Costs

Eligible members of our customers schedule transportation through the Company’s central reservation system. NET ServicesThe Company generally contracts with third-party providers to provide the transportation.transportation services to customers. The cost of transportation is recorded in the month the services are rendered based upon contractual rates and mileage estimates. Transportation providers provide invoices once theOnce a trip is completed.completed, the third-party transportation providers will furnish invoices for actual mileage incurred. Any trips that have not been invoiced require an accrual based upon the expected cost of the trips as well as an estimate forestimated number of cancellations, as the Company is generally only obligated to pay the transportation provider for completed trips. These estimates are based upon the historical trend associated with each contract’s population and the transportation provider network servicing the program. There may be differences between actual invoiced amounts and estimated costs, and any resulting adjustments are included in expense. Accrued transportation costs were $83,588$97.2 million and $72,356$96.9 million at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively.

Deferred Financing Costs and Debt Discounts

The Company capitalizes direct expensescosts incurred in connection with its credit facilities and other borrowings, referred to as deferred financing costs, and amortizes such expensescosts over the life of the respective credit facility or other borrowings. Fees charged by lenders onCosts associated with the revolving facility and all fees charged by third parties are recordedcapitalized as deferred financing costs and fees charged by lendersincluded in "Prepaid expenses and other current assets" on the consolidated balance sheets. Costs associated with term loans are recordedcapitalized and included as a reduction to the debt discount.balance on the consolidated balance sheets. Deferred financing costs for the revolving loan, net of amortization, totaling $388totaled $2.6 million and $1,070$3.1 million as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016, respectively,2022, respectively. Debt discounts for the $500.0 million Senior Unsecured Notes due 2025 of $6.0 million and $8.9 million are included in “Prepaid expenses and other” and “Other assets”, respectively,netted against the outstanding balance of the long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheetsheets as there were no borrowingsof December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Debt discounts for the $500.0 million Senior Unsecured Notes due 2029 of $10.3 million and $11.7 million are netted against the outstanding underbalance of the Company’s credit facility.long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

TheUnder ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue whenas it transfers promised services directly to its customers at the amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for providing these services. The Company's performance obligations are driven by its different segments of business and primarily consist of integrated service offerings to provide non-emergency medical transportation, personal care services, or remote monitoring services directly to its customers. The Company receives payment for providing these services from third-party payors that include federal, state, and local governmental agencies, managed care organizations, and private consumers. In the NEMT segment, the Company's performance obligation is earnedto stand ready to perform transportation-related activities, including the management, fulfillment, and recordkeeping activities associated with such services. In the PCS segment, the Company's performance obligation is to deliver patient care services in accordance with the nature and frequency of services outlined in each contract. In the RPM segment, the Company's performance obligation is to stand ready to perform monitoring services in the form of personal emergency response system monitoring, vitals monitoring, and other monitoring services, as contractually agreed upon. The Company satisfies substantially all of its performance obligations over time and recognizes revenue over time instead of at points in time which aligns the pattern of transfer of promised services with the value received by the customer for the performance completed to date.

The Company holds different contract types under its different segments of business. In the NEMT segment, there are both capitated contracts, under which payors pay a fixed amount monthly per eligible member and revenue is recognized over each distinct service period, and fee-for-service ("FFS") contracts, under which the Company bills and collects a specified amount for each service that is provided and revenue is recognized using the right to invoice practical expedient. In the PCS segment, contracts are also FFS and service revenue is reported at the estimated net realizable amount from patients and third-party payors for services rendered and revenue is recognized using the right to invoice practical expedient. Under RPM contracts, payors pay per-enrolled-member-per-month, based on the following criteria: persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinableenrolled membership, and collectability is reasonably assured.   


NET Services
Capitatedcontracts. The majority of NET Services revenue is generated under capitated contracts with customers where the Company assumes the responsibility of meeting the covered transportation requirements of a specific geographic population based on per-member per-month fees for the number of members in the customer’s program. Revenue is recognized based on the population served during the period. In some capitated contracts, partial payment is received as a prepayment during the month service is provided. These partial payments may be due back to the customer, or additional payments may be due to the Company, after each reconciliation period, based on a reconciliation of actual utilization and cost compared to the prepayment made.
Fee for service contracts.  Revenues earned under fee for service (“FFS”) contracts are based upon contractually established billing rates. Revenues are recognized when the service is provided based upon contractual amounts.
Flat fee contracts. Revenues earned under flat fee contracts are recognized ratably over the covered service period based upon contractually established fees which do not fluctuate with any changes in the membership population who are eligible to receive the transportation services.
For most contracts, the Company arranges for transportation of members through its network of independent transportation providers, whereby it remits payment to the transportation providers. However, for certain contracts, the Company only provides administrative management services to support the customers’ efforts to serve its clients, and the amount of revenue recognized is based upon the management fee earned.
WDServices
WD Services revenues are primarily generated from providing workforce development and offender rehabilitation services, both of which include employment preparation and placement, apprenticeship and training, youth community service programs and certain health related services to clients on behalf of governmental and private entities. While the specific terms vary by contract and country, the Company often receives four types of revenue streams under contracts with government entities: referral/attachment fees, job placement/job outcome fees, sustainment fees and incentive fees. Referral/attachment fees are typically upfront payments that are payable when a client is referred by the contracting government entity or that client enters the program. Job placement fees are typically payable when a client is employed. Job outcome fees are typically payable when a client attains and holds employment for a specified minimum period of time. Sustainment fees are typically payable when clients maintain a job outcome past specified employment tenure milestones. Incentive fees are generally based upon a calculation that includes a variety of factors and inputs, such as average sustainment rates and client referral rates. Incentive fees vary greatly by contract.

Referral/attachment fee revenue is recognized ratably over the periodcontract term. For each contract type, the Company determines the transaction price based on the gross charges for services provided, reduced by estimates for contractual adjustments due to settlements of service,audits and payment reviews from third-party payors. The Company determines the estimated revenue adjustments at each segment based upon anon its historical experience with various third-party payors and previous results from the claims and adjudication process. The PCS segment uses the portfolio approach to determine the estimated periodrevenue adjustments. See further information in Note 5, Revenue Recognition.



90


Government Grants

The Company has received government grants primarily under the CARES Act PRF and the ARPA SLFRF to provide economic relief and stimulus to combat health and economic impacts of time general services will be provided (i.e. the personCOVID-19 pandemic. During the third quarter of 2023, the Company also filed amended payroll tax returns for 2020 and 2021 to claim refunds for Employee Retention Credits ("ERC"). ERC is placeda U.S. federal tax credit introduced to support businesses and organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic that was initially established under the CARES Act in 2020 and was later expanded and extended by subsequent legislation, including the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. The Company received distributions from government grants of approximately $21.8 million and $16.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, of which $5.0 million and $7.4 million were recognized as "Grant income" during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, with the remaining balance recorded in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities." Distributions received under these acts are targeted to assist with incremental health care related expenses or lost revenue attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic as well as provide stimulus to support long-term growth and recovery.

The payments from these acts are subject to certain restrictions and possible recoupment if not used for designated purposes. As a job or reachescondition to receiving PRF distributions, providers must agree to certain terms and conditions, including, among other things, that the maximum time periodfunds are being used for healthcare related expenses and lost revenues attributable to COVID-19, as defined by HHS. All recipients of PRF payments are required to comply with the reporting requirements described in the terms and conditions and as determined by HHS. The Company has submitted the required documents to meet reporting requirements for the program).applicable reporting periods. The estimated period of time services will be rendered is based upon historical data. Job placement, job outcome and sustainment fee revenue is recognized when certain milestones are achieved, and amounts become billable. Incentive fee revenue is generally recognized when fixed and determinable, frequently at the endCompany received an audit inquiry letter from HHS related to one of the cumulative calculation period, unless contractualbusiness units that received PRF payments, to which the Company has responded and submitted all requested information and believes that the payments received are substantiated and within the terms allow for earned payments on a fixed or ratable basis.
Revenue is also earned under fixed FFS arrangements, based upon contractual rates established at the outset of the contract or the applicable contract year, although the rate may be prospectively adjusted during the contract year based upon actual volumes. 

If the rate is adjusted butand conditions defined by HHS and continues to include these amounts as grant income. At this time, the Company is unableunaware of any other pending or upcoming audits or inquiries related to adjustamounts received under PRF.

As a condition to receiving SLFRF, providers must agree to use the funds to respond to the PHE or its costs accordingly, or ifnegative economic impacts, to respond to workers performing essential work by providing premium pay to eligible workers and to offset reduction in revenue due to the volume or typesCOVID-19 PHE as stipulated by the states in which the funds were received. All recipients of referralsSLFRF payments are lower than estimated, our profitability may be negatively impacted. Volume levels are typically not guaranteed under contracts.
Deferred Revenue
At times we may receive fundingrequired to comply with the reporting requirements that the state in which the funds originated has requested in order for certain services in advance of services being rendered. These amounts are reflectedthe states to meet the requirements as described in the consolidated balance sheetsterms and conditions as “Deferred revenue” untildetermined by the servicesDepartment of the Treasury. The Company has complied with all known reporting requirements to date.

The Company recognizes distributions from government grants as "Grant income" or "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" in line with the loss of revenues or expenses for which the grants are rendered.intended to compensate when there is reasonable assurance that it has complied with the conditions associated with the grant.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company follows the fair value recognition provisions of ASC Topic 718 – Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), which requires companies to measure and recognize compensation expense for all share basedshare-based payments at fair value.



The Company calculates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing formula. The fair value of non-vested restricted stock grantsawards or units is determined based on the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation expense charged against income for stock options and stock grants is based on the grant-date fair value. Forfeitures are recorded as they occur. The expense for stock-based compensation awards is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is typically the vesting period.
The Company records restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that may be settled by the holder in cash, rather than shares, as a liability and remeasures these liabilities at fair value at the end of each reporting period. Forfeitures are recorded as they occur. Upon settlement of these awards, the totalcumulative compensation expense recorded over the vesting period of the awards will equal the settlement amount, which is based on the Company’s stock price on the settlement date.
Performance-basedThe Company issues performance-based RSUs ("PRSUs") that vest upon achievement of certainpre-established company specific performance conditions. On the date of grant, the Company determines theconditions and a service period. The fair value of the performance-based award usingPRSUs is determined based on the fair valueclosing market price of the Company’s Common Stock at that timeon the grant date and it assesses whether it is probable thatan assessment of the probability the performance targets will be achieved. If assessed as probable, the Company records compensation expense for these awards over the requisite service period. At each reporting period, the Company reassesses the probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period required to meet those targets. The estimation of whether the performance targets will be achieved and of the performance period required to achieve the targets requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from the Company’s current estimates, the cumulative effect on current and prior periods of those changes will be recorded in the period estimates are revised, or the change in estimate will be applied prospectively depending on whether the change affects the estimate of total compensation cost to be recognized or merely affects the period over which compensation cost is to be recognized. The ultimate number of shares issued and the related compensation expense recognized will be based on a comparison of the final performance metrics to the specified targets.
The Company calculates the fair value of market-based stock awards, including the Company’s 2015 Holding Company LTI Program (the “HoldCo LTIP”) awards, using the Monte-Carlo simulation valuation model. Forfeitures are recorded as they occur. CompensationThe expense for market-basedsuch awards is recognized over the requisite service period regardless of whether the market conditions are expected to be achieved.
period.
Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are determined by the asset and liability method in accordance with ASC Topic 740 - IncomeTaxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the carrying amounts
91


of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company considers many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of deferred tax assets, including recent earnings experience by jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income, and the carryforward periods available for tax reporting purposes, as well as other relevant factors. The Company establishes a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The net amount of deferred tax liabilities and assets, net of the valuation allowance, is presented as non-current in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

Due to inherent complexities arising from the nature of the Company’s businesses, future changes in income tax law or variances between the Company’s actual and anticipated operating results, the Company makes certain judgments and estimates. Therefore, actual income taxes could materially vary from these estimates.
 
The Company has recorded a valuation allowance which includes amounts for net operating lossescertain carryforwards and deferred tax credit carryforwards,assets, as more fully described in Note 17, 16, Income Taxes, for which the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not that these net operating losscarryforwards and deferred tax credit carryforwardsassets will not be realized in the ordinary course of operations.
 
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of income tax expense.


The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions based on a two-step process of evaluating recognition and measurement criteria. The first step assesses whether the tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the tax authority, including resolution of any appeals or litigation, based on the technical merits of the position. If the tax position meets the more likely than not criteria, the portion of the tax benefit greater than 50%50.0% likely to be realized upon settlement with the tax authority is recognized in the consolidated financial statements.


On December 22, 2017,March 27, 2020, the U.S. bill commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and JobsCARES Act (“Tax Reform Act”) was enacted as more fully described inenacted. See Note 17, 16, Income Taxes.


Foreign Currency Translation
Local currencies generally are considered the functional currencies outside the U.S. Assets and liabilitiesTaxes, for operations in local-currency environments are translated at month-end exchange ratesa discussion of the period reported. Income and expense items are translated atimpact on the average exchange rate for each applicable month. Cumulative translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, in stockholders’ equity within the consolidated balance sheets.Company from this act.

Loss Reserves for Certain Reinsurance and Self-Funded Insurance Programs

The Company historically reinsured a substantial portion of its automobile, general and professional liability and workers’ compensation costs under certain reinsurance programs primarily through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Social Services Providers Captive Insurance Company (“SPCIC”), a licensed captive insurance company domiciled in the State of Arizona. As of May 16, 2017, SPCIC did not renew the expiring reinsurance policies. SPCIC will continue to resolve claims under the historical policy years.

programs. The Company utilizes a report prepared by an independent actuary to estimate the gross expected losses related to historical automobile, general and professional and workers’ compensation liabilitythese reinsurance policies, including the estimated losses in excess of SPCIC’s insuranceinsured limits, which would be reimbursed to SPCICthe Company to the extent such losses were incurred.  As of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the Company had reserves of $6,699$20.2 million and $11,240,$16.0 million, respectively, for the automobile, general and professional liability and workers’ compensation reinsurance policies, net of expected receivables for losses in excess of SPCIC’s historical insurance limits.policies. The gross reserve as of December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 of $12,448$45.7 million and $16,505,$37.1 million, respectively, is classified as “Reinsurance liability reserves”current liabilities and “Otherother long-term liabilities”liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.  The estimated amount to be reimbursed to SPCICthe Company as of December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 was $5,749$25.5 million and $5,265,$21.1 million, respectively, and is classified as “Other receivables” and “Other assets”other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company regularly analyzes its reserves for incurred but not reported claims, and for reported but not paid claims related to its reinsurance and self-funded insurance programs. The Company believes its reserves are adequate. However, judgment is involved in assessing these reserves, such as in assessing historical paid claims, average lag times between the claims’ incurred date, reported dates and paid dates, and the frequency and severity of claims. There may be differences between actual settlement amounts and recorded reserves and any resulting adjustments are included in expense once a probable amount is known. 

Self-Funded Insurance Programs

The Company also maintains a self-funded health insurance program with a stop-loss umbrella policy with a third-party insurer to limit the maximum potential liability for individual claims generally to $275$0.3 million per person, subject to an aggregating stop-loss limit of $400.$0.4 million. In addition, the program has a total stop-loss limit for total claims, in order to limit the Company’s exposure to catastrophic claims. With respect to this program, the Company considers historical and projected medical utilization data when estimating its health insurance program liability and related expense. As of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the Company had $2,229$1.8 million and $3,022,$2.1 million, respectively, in reservereserves for its self-funded health insurance programs. The reserves are classified as “Reinsurance“Accrued expenses and related liability reserves”other current liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company utilizes analysis prepared by third-party administrators and independent actuaries based on historical claims information with respect to the general and professional liability coverage, workers’ compensation coverage, automobile liability, automobile physical damage, and health insurance coverage to determine the amount of required reserves.

The Company regularly analyzes its reserves for incurred but not reported claims, and for reported but not paid claims related to its reinsurance and self-funded insurance programs. The Company believes its reserves are adequate. However, significant judgment is involved in assessing these reserves, such as assessing historical paid claims, average lag times between the claims’ incurred date, reported dates and paid dates, and the frequency and severity of claims. There may be differences between actual settlement amounts and recorded reserves and any resulting adjustments are included in expense once a probable amount is known.
92

Restructuring, Redundancyand Related Reorganization Costs

The Company has engaged in employee headcount optimization actions within the WD Services segment which require management to estimate the timing and amount of severance and other employee separation costs for workforce reduction. The Company accrues for severance and other employee separation costs under these actions when it is probable that benefits will be paid and the amount is reasonably estimable. The amounts used in determining severance accruals are based on an estimate of the salaries and related benefit costs payable under existing plans, and are included in accrued expenses to the extent they have not been paid.
Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests represent the noncontrolling holders’ percentage share of income or losses from a subsidiary in which the Company holds a majority, but less than 100%, ownership interest and the results of which are consolidated and included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company has a 90% ownership in The Reducing Reoffending Partnership Limited, which commenced operations in 2015.  


Discontinued Operations
In determining whether a group of assets disposed (or to be disposed) of should be presented as a discontinued operation, the Company makes a determination of whether the criteria for held-for-sale classification is met and whether the disposition represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity’s operations and financial results. If these determinations can be made affirmatively, the results of operations of the group of assets being disposed of (as well as any gain or loss on the disposal transaction) are aggregated for separate presentation apart from continuing operating results of the Company in the consolidated financial statements. See Note 20, Discontinued Operations, for a summary of discontinued operations.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

The Company computes basic earnings (loss) per share by taking net income (loss) attributable to the Company available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including restricted stock and stock held in escrow if such shares are participating securities. Diluted earnings (loss) per share includes the potential dilution that may occur from stock-based awards and other stock-based commitments using the treasury stock or the as-if converted methods, as applicable. For additional information on how the Company computes earnings (loss) per share, see Note 14, Earnings (Loss) Per Share.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company discloses the fair value of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy using the following three categories:
Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The Company may be required to pay additional consideration in relation to certain acquisitions based on the achievement of certain earnings targets. Acquisition-related contingent consideration is initially measured and recorded at fair value as an element of consideration paid in connection with an acquisition with subsequent adjustments recognized in “General and administrative expense” in the consolidated statements of income. The Company determines the fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration, and any subsequent changes in fair value using a discounted probability-weighted approach. This approach takes into consideration Level 3 unobservable inputs including probability assessments of expected future cash flows over the period in which the obligation is expected to be settled and applies a discount factor that captures the uncertainties associated with the obligation. Changes in these unobservable inputs could significantly impact the fair value of the obligation recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and operating expenses in the consolidated statements of income.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair value because of the relatively short-term maturity of these instruments.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company adopted the followingRecent accounting pronouncements duringthat the year ended December 31, 2017: Company has yet to adopt are as follows:


In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes (“ASU 2015-17”), which changes how deferred taxes are classified on organizations’ balance sheets. The ASU eliminates the current requirement for organizations to present deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Instead, organizations will be required to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent. The amendments apply to all organizations that present a classified balance sheet. For public companies, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 16, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU 2015-17 retrospectively on January 1, 2017, which resulted in the reclassification of the December 31, 2016 deferred tax assets-current balance of $6,825 and non-current deferred tax assets of $2,493 to long-term deferred tax liabilities in the amount of $9,318.



In March 2016,2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting (“ASU 2016-07”). ASU 2016-07 eliminates the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. ASU 2016-07 instead specifies that the investor should add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and apply the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment became qualified for equity method accounting. ASU 2016-07 is effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016 and should be applied prospectively. The Company adopted ASU 2016-07 on January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-07 had no impact on the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)280): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“Reportable Segment Disclosures ("ASU 2016-09”2023-07"). ASU 2016-09 is intended to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments and affect all organizationsThis update improves reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosure about significant segment expenses. The enhancements under this update require disclosure of significant segment expenses that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification in the statement of cash flows. For public companies, the amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017, and elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur. As a result, the Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $850 to retained earnings as of January 1, 2017. Upon adoption, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies related to employee share-based payments are recognized through income tax expense prospectively.

The Company excluded the related tax benefits when applying the treasury stock method for computing diluted shares outstanding on a prospective basis resulting in a decrease in diluted weighted average shares outstanding of 4,642 shares for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The adoption of ASU 2016-09 subjects our tax rate to quarterly volatility from the effects of stock award exercises and vesting activities, including the adverse impact on our income tax provision for awards which result in a tax deduction less than the amount recorded for financial reporting purposes based upon the fair value of the award at the grant date. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded excess tax deficiencies, net, of $3,604 as an increaseregularly provided to the provision for income taxes. This deficiency primarily related to the Company's Holdco LTIP. As further explained in Note 12, Stock-Based CompensationChief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") and Similar Arrangements, no shares were distributed under the Company’s HoldCo LTIP as the volume weighted averageincluded within each reported measure of Providence’s stock price over the 90-day trading period ended on December 31, 2017 did not exceed $56.79. As this market condition was not satisfied, a related tax deficiency was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2017segment profit or loss, require disclosure of $3,590.

The Company elected to apply the change in classification of cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits or deficiencies on a retrospective basis. This resulted in an increase in cash flows providedother segment items by operating activities of $282, offset by an increase of $282 in cash flows used in financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016, and an increase in cash flows provided by operating activities of $2,857, offset by an increase of $2,857 in cash flows used in financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015. Additionally, ASU 2016-09 requires that employee taxes paid when an employer withholds shares for tax-withholding purposes be reported as financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows, which is how the Company has historically classified these amounts.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805):Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The Company adopted ASU 2017-01 on April 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2017-01 had no impact on the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic323) (“ASU 2017-03”). ASU 2017-03 expands required qualitative disclosures when registrants cannot reasonably estimate the impact that adoption of an ASU will have on the financial statements. Such qualitative disclosures would include a comparison of the registrant’s new accounting policies, if determined, to current accounting policies, a description of the status of the registrant’s process to implement the new standardreportable segment and a description of the significant implementation matters yetcomposition of other segment items, require annual disclosures under ASC 280 to be addressedprovided in interim periods, clarify use of more than one measure of segment profit or loss by the registrant. The Company implemented ASU 2016-15 in its consolidated financial statements forCODM, require that the year ended December 31, 2017 resulting in enhanced qualitative disclosures regarding future adoption of new ASUs.



In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04 removes the requirement to compare the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount as part of step twotitle of the goodwill impairment test. AsCODM be disclosed with an explanation of how the CODM uses the reported measures of segment profit or loss to make decisions, and require that entities with a result,single reportable segment provide all disclosures required by this update and required under ASC 280. ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the impairment loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 on April 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2017-04 had no impact on the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.
Recent accounting pronouncements that were not yet adopted by the Company through December 31, 2017 are as follows:
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 introduced FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606 (“ASC 606”), which will replace most currently applicable existing revenue recognition guidance and is intended to improve and converge with international standards the financial reporting requirements for revenue from contracts with customers. The core principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services. ASC 606 also requires additional disclosures about the nature, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. ASU 2014-09 allows for adoption either on a full retrospective basis to each prior reporting period presented or on a modified retrospective basis with the cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance recognized at the date of initial application, which2023-07 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018.

The Company has substantially completed its adoption plan, under which it performed conceptual and detailed contract reviews to determine the impact of ASC 606 on its financial statements, internal controls and operational processes. The guidance in ASC 606 on the following topics was critical to the Company’s analysis:

the effect of specified clauses on the term of many of the Company’s contracts with customers;
the nature of the promises in many of the Company’s contracts with customers to perform integrated services over a period of time;
whether and how much variable consideration to include when determining the transaction prices for its contracts with customers;
whether any of the Company’s customer contracts require performance over a series of distinct service periods and the impact on determining and allocating the transaction price; and
the manner in which the Company will measure its progress towards fully satisfying its performance obligations, including a determination of whether the Company may be able to use certain practical expedients.

The impact of adoption on revenue for each segment is as follows:

NET Services For non-emergency transportation solutions, the Company will primarily use the right-to-invoice practical expedient to account for revenue when the Company has a right to consideration from a customer in an amount that corresponds directly with the value of the entity’s performance completed to date. This is consistent with the Company’s current revenue recognition policy. The only impact identified for NET Services is the presentation of one contract on a net basis which is currently accounted for on a gross basis, as the Company does not control the service, as defined under the new standard.

WD Services – WD Services has a number of contracts which include variable consideration, whereby it earns revenues if certain contractually defined outcomes occur in the future. When the related performance obligations are satisfied over time, the Company will recognize revenue in the proportion that the outcome has been earned based on services provided. The amount of revenue is based upon the Company’s estimate of the final amount of outcome fees to be earned. The Company will evaluate probability using either the expected value method or the most likely amount method, as appropriate. At each reporting period, the Company will update its estimate of outcome fees, based upon actual results as well as refined estimates of future results, and will record an adjustment to revenue, based upon services performed to date. Under the new standard, the Company may recognize revenues for outcome fees earlier under the new standard, as revenue is currently recognized upon the final resolution of the contingency, i.e. the outcome is able to be invoiced. However, under certain contracts the Company receives up-front fees, which may be recognized over a longer period under the new standard as compared to current guidance. As of adoption, such impacts are not material to the consolidated financial statements.



The new standard will require the Company to recognize contract assets and liabilities on its balance sheet as appropriate. Additionally, the Company will be required to make additional disclosures about the nature of its contracts and the related performance obligations.

The Company is in its final stages of quantifying the financial impacts of the new guidance based on the contracts that exist at the date of adoption, as well as evaluating presentation of our revenues and required enhancements to disclosures. We have implemented both process and information systems changes to identify and assess contracts that are impacted by the new revenue recognition criteria and accumulate data to satisfy new disclosure requirements. As discussed above, we expect the new standard will have an immaterial impact on our consolidated financial statements, other than increased disclosures, upon adoption. Changes to revenue recognition as a result of applying the new standard will largely arise from outcome fees as described above, as well as the timing of revenue recognition for up-front fees. The Company will use the modified retrospective adoption method, and plans to adopt the standard on January 1, 2018.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 introduced FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 842 (“ASC 842”), which will replace ASC 840, Leases. Under ASC 842, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. 

ASU 2016-02 is effective for publicly heldpublic business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is2023, with early adoption permitted. Lessees must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach does not require transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Company has not entered into significant lease agreements in which it is the lessor; however, the Company does have lease agreements in which it is the lessee. The Company is assessing the impact of applying ASC 842 to its lease agreements. It is in the process of developing an adoption plan, assembling a cross-functional project team and assessing the impacts of applying ASC 842 to the Company’s financial statements, information systems and internal controls. The assessment of applying ASU 2016-02 is ongoing and, therefore, the Company has not yet determined whether the impacts will be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


In June 2016,December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 326) (“740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures ("ASU 2016-13”2023-09"). The amendmentsThis update enhances the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures including updates to the disclosures related to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. These updates improve transparency by requiring consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and requiring income taxes paid to be disaggregated by jurisdiction. ASU 2016-13 will supersede or clarify much of the existing guidance for reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized cost basis and available for sale debt securities. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, net investments in leases, off balance sheet credit exposures, reinsurance receivables, and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. ASU 2016-132023-09 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company has not evaluated the impact of ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 provides guidance for eight targeted changes with respect to how cash receipts and cash payments are classified in the statements of cash flows, with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. ASU 2016-15 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt ASU 2016-15 on January 1, 2018. The adoption is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017,2024, with early adoption permitted.
93


3. Acquisitions
Business Combinations

Care Finders Total Care, LLC

On September 14, 2021, the Company acquired Care Finders which is a personal care provider in the Northeast, with operations in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoptionConnecticut. The acquisition of Care Finders broadens access to in-home personal care solutions for patients and supports the Company's strategy to expand its personal care platform.

The equity transaction was accounted for in an interim period; however, any adjustments must be reflectedaccordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations in which a wholly-owned subsidiary of ModivCare Inc. acquired 100.0% of the equity securities of Care Finders for $333.4 million (a purchase price of $344.8 million less $11.4 million of cash that was acquired).

The following table summarizes information from the allocation of the consideration transferred to acquired identifiable assets and assumed liabilities as of the beginningacquisition date of September 14, 2021 (in thousands):

Cash$11,424 
Accounts receivable(1)
14,708 
Prepaid expenses and other(2)
2,625 
Property and equipment(3)
2,527 
Inventories(4)
231 
Operating right of use asset(5)
1,939 
Intangibles(6)
100,750 
Goodwill(7)
232,103 
Other assets(8)
226 
Accounts payable(9)
(2,720)
Accrued expenses and other accrued liabilities(9)
(14,344)
Operating lease liability(5)
(1,939)
Deferred tax liabilities(10)
(2,327)
Other liabilities(9)
(378)
Total of assets acquired less liabilities assumed$344,825 

(1)     Management has valued accounts receivable based on the estimated future collectability of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. ASU 2016-18 must be adopted retrospectively. receivables portfolio.
(2)     Given the short-term nature of the balance of prepaid expenses, the carrying value represents the fair value.
(3)     The acquired property and equipment consists primarily of capitalized software, computer equipment, and automobiles. The fair value of the property and equipment was determined based upon the best and highest use of the property with final values determined using cost and comparable sales methods.
(4)     Given the short-term nature of the balance of inventories, the carrying value represents the fair value.
(5)     The fair value of the operating lease liability and corresponding right-of-use asset (current and long-term) was recorded at $1.9 million based on market rates available to the Company.
(6)     The allocation of consideration exchanged to intangible assets acquired is as follows (in thousands, except useful lives):

TypeUseful LifeValue
Payor networkAmortizable7 years$97,200 
Trade nameAmortizable3 years1,950 
Non-compete agreementAmortizable5 years1,600 
$100,750 

94


The Company valued the payor network utilizing the multi-period excess earnings method, trade names utilizing the relief-from-royalty method and non-compete agreement utilizing the with/without method. The weighted average useful life of the acquired intangible assets is approximately 6.9 years.

(7)     The acquisition initially resulted in $232.2 million of goodwill as a result of expected synergies due to future customers driven by expansion into different markets, an increase in market share, and a growing demographic that will adopt ASU 2016-15 on January 1, 2018.need home care solutions. In the third quarter of 2022, goodwill decreased by $0.1 million as a result of changes to accounts payable and deferred tax liabilities, as discussed in detail below. All of the acquired goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.
(8)     Included in other assets are security deposits with a value of $0.2 million.
(9)     Due to the short-term nature of the accounts, the carrying value is assumed to represent the fair value for accounts payable as well as certain other current liabilities as of the acquisition date. The adoption will impactcarrying value for non-current liabilities is also assumed to represent the fair value as of the acquisition date. In the third quarter of 2022, it was determined that an additional $0.2 million of accounts payable existed as of the acquisition date, and therefore, the initial balance of $2.5 million was increased to $2.7 million.
(10)     Net deferred tax liabilities represent the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and their tax basis. In the third quarter of 2022, deferred tax liabilities of $2.6 million decreased by $0.3 million due to tax impacts of the acquisition.

VRI Intermediate Holdings, LLC

On September 22, 2021, the Company acquired VRI, a provider of remote patient monitoring solutions that manages a comprehensive suite of services including personal emergency response systems, vitals monitoring and data-driven patient engagement solutions. The acquisition of VRI accelerates the Company's consolidated statementsstrategy to build a holistic suite of supportive care solutions that address SDoH, introduces new technology-enabled in-home solutions that deepen the Company's engagement with payors and patients, and adds a new suite of services and operating team to advance the Company's broader technology and data strategy.

The stock transaction was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations in which a wholly-owned subsidiary of ModivCare Inc. acquired 100.0% of the equity securities of VRI for $314.6 million (a purchase price of $317.5 million less $2.9 million of cash flowthat was acquired).

The following table summarizes the allocation of the consideration transferred to acquired identifiable assets and assumed liabilities as of the acquisition date of September 22, 2021 (in thousands):

Cash$2,922 
Accounts receivable(1)
6,800 
Inventory(2)
1,684 
Prepaid expenses and other(3)
805 
Property and equipment(4)
14,908 
Intangible assets(5)
75,590 
Goodwill(6)
236,317 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(7)
(1,884)
Accrued expense(7)
(2,487)
Deferred revenue(7)
(67)
Deferred tax liabilities(8)
(17,070)
Total of assets acquired less liabilities assumed$317,518 

(1)    Management has valued accounts receivable based on the estimated future collectability of the receivables portfolio.
(2)     Given the short-term nature of the balance of inventories, the carrying value represents the fair value.
(3)     Given the short-term nature of the balance of prepaid expenses, the carrying value represents the fair value.
(4)     The acquired property and equipment consists primarily of personal emergency response system devices, with the remainder consisting of computer equipment, buildings and other equipment. The Company valued the personal emergency response system devices, computer equipment and other equipment utilizing the cost approach at $12.7
95


million. The carrying value of the remainder of the property and equipment, consisting primarily of buildings and land, is assumed to represent the fair value.
(5)    The allocation of consideration exchanged to intangible assets acquired is as follows (in thousands, except useful lives):

TypeUseful LifeValue
Payor networkAmortizable7 years$72,150 
Trade nameAmortizable3 years890 
Developed technologyAmortizable3 years2,550 
$75,590 

The Company valued payor network utilizing the multi-period excess earnings method, trade names utilizing the relief-from-royalty method and developed technology utilizing the cost approach. The weighted average useful life of the acquired intangible assets is approximately 6.8 years.

(6)     The acquisition initially resulted in $236.7 million of goodwill as a result of expected synergies due to future customers driven by expansion into different markets and an increase in market share. In the third quarter of 2022, goodwill decreased by $0.4 million due to a decrease in deferred tax liabilities, as discussed in more detail below. The related goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.
(7)     Due to the short-term nature of the accounts, the carrying value is assumed to represent the fair value for accounts payable as well as certain other current liabilities as of the acquisition date. The carrying value for non-current liabilities is also assumed to represent the fair value as of the acquisition date.
(8)     Net deferred tax liabilities represent the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and their tax basis. In the third quarter of 2022, deferred tax liabilities of $17.5 million decreased by $0.4 million due to tax impacts of the acquisition.

Guardian Medical Monitoring

On May 11, 2022, the Company has restricted cash totaling $6,296 at December 31, 2017. Additionally,acquired Guardian Medical Monitoring ("GMM"), a provider of remote patient monitoring solutions that manages a comprehensive suite of services including personal emergency response systems and medication management. The acquisition of GMM supports the Company's strategy to expand its RPM segment and enhances the Company's suite of supportive care solutions that address SDoH.

The stock transaction was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations in which a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company will be requiredacquired 100.0% of the equity securities of GMM for $71.2 million (a purchase price of $71.6 million less $0.4 million of cash that was acquired).

The following table summarizes the allocation of the consideration transferred to makeacquired identifiable assets and assumed liabilities as of the acquisition date of May 11, 2022 (in thousands):

Cash(1)
$391 
Accounts receivable(2)
2,355 
Prepaid expenses and other(3)
771 
Property and equipment(4)
2,639 
Intangible assets(5)
21,950 
Goodwill(6)
44,346 
Accounts payable(7)
(281)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities(7)
(577)
Total of assets acquired less liabilities assumed$71,594 

(1)     During 2022, the Company received an additional disclosures detailing$0.1 million of cash related to net working capital adjustments, and therefore, the initial balance of $0.3 million was increased to $0.4 million.
96


(2)    Management has valued accounts receivable based on the estimated future collectability of the receivables portfolio. During 2022, it was determined that $0.6 million of the initial accounts receivable balance was uncollectible, and therefore, the initial balance of $3.0 million was decreased to $2.4 million.
(3)     Given the short-term nature of the balance sheet line itemsof prepaid expenses and other assets, the carrying value represents the fair value.
(4)     The acquired property and equipment consists primarily of personal emergency response system devices, with the remainder consisting of computer equipment and furniture and fixtures. The Company valued the personal emergency response system devices utilizing the cost approach. Through this valuation, it was determined that $0.1 million of acquired property and equipment did not exist, and therefore, the initial balance of $2.7 million was decreased to $2.6 million. The carrying value of the remainder of the property and equipment, consisting primarily of computer equipment and furniture and fixtures, is assumed to represent the fair value.
(5)    The allocation of consideration exchanged to intangible assets acquired is as follows (in thousands, except useful lives):

TypeUseful LifeValue
Payor networkAmortizable7 years$21,600 
Trade nameAmortizable2 years350 
$21,950 

The Company valued the payor network utilizing the multi-period excess earnings method and trade names utilizing the relief-from-royalty method. The weighted average useful life of the acquired intangible assets is approximately 6.9 years.

(6)     The acquisition initially resulted in $43.7 million of goodwill as a result of expected synergies due to future customers driven by expansion into different markets and an increase in market share. During the measurement period, accounts receivable was reduced by $0.6 million which caused a corresponding increase to goodwill. Also during the measurement period, cash increased by $0.1 million related to working capital adjustments, which caused a corresponding decrease to goodwill, and acquired property and equipment decreased by $0.1 million, which caused a corresponding increase to goodwill. The result of these adjustments was a total goodwill balance of $44.3 million. All of the acquired goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.
(7)     Due to the short-term nature of the accounts, the carrying value is assumed to represent the fair value for accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities as of the acquisition date.

Since the date of the acquisition, GMM revenue of $11.9 million and net income of $1.8 million are included in the sumCompany's consolidated results of cash, cash equivalentsoperations.

Pro Forma Financial Information (unaudited)

Assuming Care Finders, VRI and restricted cashGMM had been acquired as of January 1, 2021, and the results of each had been included in operations beginning on the assumed acquisition date, the following table provides estimated unaudited pro forma results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021 (in thousands, except earnings per share). The estimated pro forma net income adjusts for the effect of fair value adjustments related to each of the acquisitions, transaction costs and other non-recurring costs directly attributable to the transactions and the impact of the additional debt to finance the applicable acquisitions.

December 31,
20222021
Pro forma:
Revenue$2,510,875 $2,200,339 
Net loss(32,770)(21,547)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share$(2.33)$(1.53)

Estimated unaudited pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred had the acquisitions been completed on the date indicated or of future operating results. The supplemental pro forma
97


earnings were adjusted to exclude the impact of historical interest expense for Care Finders and VRI of $3.7 million and $3.2 million, respectively, for 2021. No adjustment related to interest expense was required for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Acquisition-related costs of approximately $2.0 million for GMM, were expensed as incurred, recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2022, and are reflected in the consolidated statementspro forma table above at the assumed acquisition date. Acquisition-related costs of cash flow.

In May 2017,approximately $6.6 million and $4.7 million for Care Finders and VRI, respectively, were expensed as incurred, recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses during the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation–Stock Compensation (Topic 718):Scopeyear ended December 31, 2021 and are reflected in the pro forma table above at the assumed acquisition date. Acquisition-related costs consisted of Modification Accounting (“ASU 2017-09”). ASU 2017-09 provides guidance about which changesprofessional fees for advisory, consulting and underwriting services as well as other incremental costs directly related to the termsacquisitions.

Asset Acquisitions

WellRyde

On May 6, 2021, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with nuVizz to purchase the software, WellRyde. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, the WellRyde software was acquired for total consideration of a share-based payment award$12.0 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments.



should beThe transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. The Company incurred transaction costs for the acquisition of $0.5 million during the period ended December 31, 2021. These costs were capitalized as a modification. A changecomponent of the purchase price.

The consideration paid for the acquisition is as follows (in thousands):
Value
Consideration paid$12,000 
Transaction costs463 
Net consideration$12,463 

The fair value allocation of the net consideration is as follows (in thousands, except useful lives):
TypeUseful LifeValue
Transportation management softwareAmortizable10 years$12,328 
Assembled workforceAmortizable10 years135 
$12,463 

Other Asset Acquisition

On May 30, 2022, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with a private entity to an award should bepurchase certain customer contracts within our PCS segment. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, the contracts were acquired for total consideration of $7.6 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments.

The transaction was accounted for as a modification unless thean asset acquisition in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. The fair value of the modified awardnet consideration is as follows (in thousands, except useful lives):

TypeUseful LifeValue
Payor networkAmortizable6 years$7,297 
Assembled workforceAmortizable6 years309 
$7,606 

4.    Segments
The Company’s reportable segments are identified based on a number of factors related to how its Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") determines the allocation of resources and assesses the performance of the Company’s operations. The CODM uses service revenue, net and operating income as the measures of gross revenue and profit or loss to assess
98


segment performance and allocate resources, and uses total assets as the measure of assets attributable to each segment. The Company's operating income for the reportable segments includes an allocated portion of corporate expenses to the respective segments and includes revenues and all other costs directly attributable to the specific segment.

The Company’s reportable segments are strategic units that offer different services under different financial and operating models to the Company’s customers. The segments are managed separately because each requires different technology and marketing strategies. The Company's CODM manages the Company under four reportable segments.

NEMT - The Company's NEMT segment is the samelargest manager of non-emergency medical transportation programs for state governments and managed care organizations, or MCOs, in the U.S. This segment also holds the results of the Company's captive insurance program;

PCS - The Company's PCS segment provides in home personal care services to State and Managed Medicaid, Medicare, and Private Pay patient populations in need of care monitoring and assistance performing activities of daily living;

RPM - The Company's RPM segment provides remote patient monitoring solutions, including personal emergency response systems, vitals monitoring, medication management, and data-driven patient engagement solutions; and

Corporate and Other - Effective January 1, 2022, the Company completed its segment reorganization which resulted in the addition of a Corporate and Other segment that includes the costs associated with the Company's corporate operations as well as the original award,results of an investment in innovation that the vesting conditions do not change,Company made at the end of the first quarter of 2023 related to our data analytics capabilities, which contributes to service revenue and service expense. The operating results of the Corporate and Other segment include activities related to executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal, debt and the classificationrelated interest expense, and certain strategic and corporate development functions for each segment, the results of this investment in innovation, as an equitywell as the results of the Company's Matrix investment. Prior to the segment reorganization, the Company reported the investment in Matrix as a separate operating segment. Based on the relative size of the Matrix investment and all related activity to the overall financial statements, the CODM no longer views it as a separate operating segment but reviews results in conjunction with the other corporate results of the business. The Company reclassified certain costs associated with this reorganization for the year ended December 31, 2021 to conform to this presentation.

The following table sets forth certain financial information attributable to the Company’s business segments for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31, 2023
 NEMTPCSRPMCorporate and OtherTotal
Service revenue, net$1,951,447 $715,615 $77,941 $6,167 $2,751,170 
Grant income(1)
— 5,037 — — 5,037 
Service expense1,709,790 561,919 27,025 5,484 2,304,218 
General and administrative expense115,355 86,767 22,971 79,471 304,564 
Depreciation and amortization27,409 51,402 24,536 924 104,271 
Impairment of goodwill— 137,331 45,769 — 183,100 
Operating income (loss)$98,893 $(116,767)$(42,360)$(79,712)$(139,946)
Equity in net income (loss) of investee, net of tax$1,057 $— $— $(770)$287 
Equity investment$1,653 $— $— $39,878 $41,531 
Goodwill$135,186 $415,444 $234,894 $30 $785,554 
Total assets$542,100 $763,366 $344,527 $117,282 $1,767,275 
99


 Year Ended December 31, 2022
 NEMTPCSRPMCorporate and OtherTotal
Service revenue, net$1,768,442 $667,674 $68,277 $— $2,504,393 
Grant income(1)
— 7,351 — — 7,351 
Service expense1,487,447 520,065 24,562 — 2,032,074 
General and administrative expense146,935 91,365 23,156 60,715 322,171 
Depreciation and amortization28,709 51,025 19,854 827 100,415 
Operating income (loss)$105,351 $12,570 $705 $(61,542)$57,084 
Equity in net income (loss) of investee, net of tax$71 $— $— $(30,035)$(29,964)
Equity investment$186 $— $— $41,117 $41,303 
Goodwill$135,186 $552,775 $280,663 $30 $968,654 
Total assets$496,605 $950,181 $396,944 $100,542 $1,944,272 

 Year Ended December 31, 2021
 NEMTPCSRPMCorporate and OtherTotal
Service revenue, net$1,483,696 $495,579 $17,617 $— $1,996,892 
Grant income(1)
— 5,441 — — 5,441 
Service expense1,186,185 392,508 5,605 — 1,584,298 
General and administrative expense132,493 70,704 5,791 62,686 271,674 
Depreciation and amortization29,058 23,759 4,181 — 56,998 
Operating income (loss)$135,960 $14,049 $2,040 $(62,686)$89,363 
Equity in net loss of investee, net of tax$— $— $— $(38,250)$(38,250)
Equity investment$— $— $— $83,069 $83,069 
Goodwill$135,186 $552,833 $236,738 $30 $924,787 
Total assets$546,923 $1,020,014 $340,913 $119,575 $2,027,425 

(1)     Grant income for the PCS segment includes funding received on a periodic basis from the PRF in relation to relief under the CARES Act and funding received from the SLFRF under ARPA in relation to economic recovery to combat health and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. See Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements.

5.    Revenue Recognition

Under ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue as it transfers promised services to its customers and generates all of its revenue from contracts with customers. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for these services. The Company satisfies substantially all of its performance obligations over time and recognizes revenue over time instead of at points in time.

Revenue Contract Structure

NEMT Capitated Contracts (per-member-per-month)

100


Under capitated contracts, payors pay a fixed amount per eligible member per month. Capitation rates are generally based on expected costs and volume of services. The Company assumes the responsibility of meeting the covered healthcare related transportation requirements based on per-member per-month fees for the number of eligible members in the payor’s program. Revenue is recognized based on the population served during the period. Certain capitated contracts have provisions for reconciliations, risk corridors or profit rebates. For contracts with reconciliation provisions, capitation payment is received as a prepayment during the month service is provided. These prepayments are reconciled based on actual cost and/or trip volume and may result in refunds to the payor, or additional payments due from the payor. Contracts with risk corridor or profit rebate provisions allow for profit within a certain corridor and once the Company reaches profit level thresholds or maximums, it discontinues recognizing revenue and instead records a liability instrumentwithin the accrued contract payable account. This liability may be reduced through future increases in trip volume or periodic settlements with the payor. While a profit rebate provision could only result in a liability from this profit threshold, a risk corridor provision could potentially result in a receivable if the Company does not change. This guidancereach certain profit minimums, which would be recorded in the reconciliation contract receivables account.

NEMT Fee-for-service Contracts

Fee-for-service ("FFS") revenue represents revenue earned under non-capitated contracts in which the Company bills and collects a specified amount for each service that it provides. FFS revenue is effectiverecognized in the period in which the services are rendered and is reduced by the estimated impact of contractual allowances.

PCS Fee-for-service Contracts

PCS FFS revenue is reported at the estimated net realizable amount from clients, patients and third-party payors for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoptionservices rendered based on actual personal care hours provided. Payment for services received from third-party payors includes, but is permitted.not limited to, insurance companies, hospitals, governmental agencies and other home health care providers who subcontract work to the Company. Certain contracts are subject to retroactive audit and possible adjustment by those payors based on the nature of the contract or costs incurred. The Company will adopt ASU 2016-15makes estimates of adjustments and considers these in the recognition of revenue in the period in which the related services are rendered. The difference between estimated settlement and actual settlement is reported in net service revenues as adjustments become known or as years are no longer subject to such audits, reviews, or investigations.

RPM per-member-per-month Contracts

RPM per-member-per-month ("PMPM") revenue consists of revenue from monitoring services provided to the customer. Under RPM contracts, payors pay per-enrolled-member-per-month based on January 1, 2018. The adoptionenrolled membership. Consideration is generally fixed for each type of ASU 2017-09monitoring service and revenue is not expected to have a material impactrecognized ratably over the contract term based on the Company’smonthly fee paid by customers.

Disaggregation of Revenue by Contract Type
The following table summarizes disaggregated revenue from contracts with customers by contract type for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
202320222021
NEMT capitated contracts$1,663,987 $1,553,407 $1,257,390 
NEMT FFS contracts287,460 215,035 226,306 
Total NEMT service revenue, net1,951,447 1,768,442 1,483,696 
PCS FFS contracts715,615 667,674 495,579 
RPM PMPM contracts77,941 68,277 17,617 
Other service revenue6,167 — — 
Total service revenue, net$2,751,170 $2,504,393 $1,996,892 

101


Payor Information
Service revenue, net, is derived from state and managed Medicaid contracts, managed Medicare contracts, as well as a small amount from private pay and other contracts. Of the NEMT segment’s revenue, 11.2%, 10.9% and 9.7% were derived from one payor for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Of the PCS segment's revenue, 11.3%, 12.0% and 11.7% were derived from one payor for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Of the RPM segment's revenue, 18.5%, 19.9%, and 27.0% were derived from one payor for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Revenue Adjustments

During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 the Company recognized a reduction of $2.8 million, a reduction of $0.9 million, and an increase of $11.4 million in service revenue, respectively, from contractual adjustments relating to performance obligations satisfied in previous periods to which the payor agreed.

Related Balance Sheet Accounts
The following table provides information about accounts receivable, net as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 (in thousands):
December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Accounts receivable$223,506 $225,288 
Allowance for doubtful accounts(969)(2,078)
Accounts receivable, net$222,537 $223,210 
The following table provides information about other revenue related accounts included on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.balance sheets (in thousands):
December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Accrued contract payables(1)
$117,488 $194,287 
Contract receivables(2)
$143,960 $71,131 
Long-term contract receivables(3)
$— $427 
Deferred revenue, current$2,629 $2,202 
(1)     Accrued contract payables primarily represent overpayments and liability reserves on certain risk corridor, profit rebate and reconciliation contracts. See the contract payables and receivables activity below.
3.(2)     Contract receivables primarily represent underpayments and receivables on certain risk corridor, profit rebate, and reconciliation contracts. See the contract payables and receivables activity below.
(3)     Long-term contract receivables primarily represent future receivable balances on certain risk corridor, profit rebate and reconciliation contracts that may be received in greater than 12 months.

The following table provides the summary activity of total contract payables and receivables as reported within the consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):

December 31, 2022Additional Amounts RecordedAmounts Paid or SettledDecember 31, 2023
Reconciliation contract payables$25,853 $17,723 $(31,282)$12,294 
Profit rebate/corridor contract payables155,161 61,623 (122,009)94,775 
Overpayments and other cash items13,273 23,322 (26,176)10,419 
Total contract payables$194,287 $102,668 $(179,467)$117,488 
Reconciliation contract receivables$48,153 $59,184 $(50,335)$57,002 
Corridor contract receivables23,405 64,009 (456)86,958 
Total contract receivables$71,558 $123,193 $(50,791)$143,960 
102



6. Equity Investment
 
Matrix
Prior to the closingAs of the Matrix Transaction on October 19, 2016, the financial results of Matrix were included in the Company’s HA Services segment. Subsequent to the closing of the Matrix Transaction,December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company owned a 46.8% noncontrolling interest in Matrix. As of December 31, 2017, the Company owned a 46.6% noncontrolling43.6% non-controlling interest in Matrix. Pursuant to a Shareholder’s Agreement, affiliates of Frazier Healthcare Partners hold rights necessary to control the fundamental operations of Matrix. The Company accounts for this investment in Matrix under the equity method of accounting and the Company’s share of Matrix’s income or losses are recorded as “Equity in net (gain)(income) loss of investees”investee, net of tax” in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.operations. During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, Matrix recorded asset impairment charges of $82.2 million and $111.4 million, respectively. Matrix recorded no asset impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2023.


The Company's gross share of Matrix's operations for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was a loss of $1.1 million, $41.0 million and $53.1 million, respectively, which is presented net of tax on the consolidated statements of operations for a loss of $0.8 million, $30.0 million and $38.3 million, respectively.

The carrying amount of the assets included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheetsheets and the maximum loss exposure related to the Company’s interest in Matrix as of December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 totaled $169,699$41.5 million and $157,202,$41.3 million, respectively.


Summary financial information for Matrix on a standalone basis is as follows:follows (in thousands): 

 December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Current assets$112,090 $97,750 
Long-term assets$351,143 $373,297 
Current liabilities$41,584 $36,913 
Long-term liabilities$314,316 $325,613 

 Year ended December 31, 2023Year ended December 31, 2022Year ended December 31, 2021
Revenue$325,192 $300,306 $398,260 
Operating income (loss)$30,418 $(83,110)$1,316 
Net loss$(1,689)$(98,187)$(122,898)

 December 31,
 2017 2016
Current assets$37,563
 $28,589
Long-term assets597,613
 614,841
Current liabilities27,718
 25,791
Long-term liabilities240,513
 281,348
 Twelve months ended December 31, 2017 
October 19, 2016
through
December 31, 2016
Revenue$227,872
 $41,635
Operating income (loss)11,870
 (4,079)
Net income (loss)26,665
 (4,200)
Included in Matrix’s standalone net income of $26,665 for the year ended December 31, 2017 is depreciation and amortization of $33,512, transaction related expenses of $3,537, which includes $2,679 of transaction incentive compensation, equity compensation of $2,639, management fees paid to Matrix’s shareholders of $2,331, merger and acquisition due diligence related costs of $685, interest expense of $14,818 and an income tax benefit of $29,613. The income tax benefit primarily related to the re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities arising from a lower U.S. corporate tax rate as a result of the Tax Reform Act. Included in Matrix’s standalone net loss of $4,200 for the year ended December 31, 2016 is depreciation and amortization of $6,356, transaction related expenses of $6,367, which includes $4,033 of transaction incentive compensation, equity compensation of $407, management fees paid to Matrix’s shareholders of $396, interest expense of $2,949 and an income tax benefit of $2,828.

See Note 20, Discontinued Operations, for Matrix’s January 1, 2016 through October 19, 2016 results of operations, as well as the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Mission Providence
The Company entered into a joint venture agreement in November 2014 with Mission Australia ACN (“Mission Australia”) to form Mission Providence. Mission Providence delivers employment preparation and placement services in Australia. The


Company had a 60% ownership interest in Mission Providence, and had rights to 75% of Mission Providence’s distributions of cash or profit surplus twice per calendar year. The Company accounted for this investment under the equity method of accounting and the Company’s share of Mission Providence’s income or losses was recorded as “Equity in net (gain) loss of investees” in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Cash contributions made to Mission Providence in exchange for its equity interests are included in the consolidated statements of cash flows as “Purchase of equity investments”.

On September 29, 2017, the Company and Mission Australia completed the sale of 100% of the stock of Mission Providence pursuant to a share sale agreement. Upon the sale of Mission Providence, the Company received AUD 20,184, or $15,823 of proceeds, for its equity interest, net of transaction fees. Subsequently, a working capital adjustment was finalized in December 2017 resulting in the return of $229 of the proceeds. The related gain on sale of Mission Providence totaling $12,377 is recorded as “Gain on sale of equity investment” in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The carrying amount of the assets included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet related to the Company’s interest in Mission Providence was $4,021 at December 31, 2016.

Summary financial information for Mission Providence on a standalone basis is as follows:
 December 31, 2016
Current assets$4,640
Long-term assets10,473
Current liabilities12,844
Long-term liabilities1,655
 Nine months ended September 30, 2017 Twelve months ended December 31, 2016
Revenue$30,125
 $36,546
Operating loss(1,765) (9,664)
Net loss(1,934) (8,843)
4.7.    Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets were comprised of the following:following (in thousands):

 December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Prepaid insurance$7,231 $6,334 
Deferred ERP implementation costs2,875 5,817 
Deferred financing costs on credit facility2,638 3,061 
Prepaid income taxes2,418 7,186 
Other prepaid expenses11,866 11,934 
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets$27,028 $34,332 
 

103


 December 31,
 2017 2016
Prepaid income taxes$1,106
 $1,467
Escrow funds10,000
 10,000
Prepaid insurance2,121
 3,153
Prepaid taxes and licenses906
 3,570
Note receivable3,224
 3,130
Prepaid rent2,268
 2,013
Deposits held for leased premises and bonds2,849
 2,609
Other12,769
 11,953
Total prepaid expenses and other$35,243
 $37,895
Escrow funds represent amounts related to indemnification claims from the sale of the Human Services segment, which was completed on November 1, 2015. The Company has accrued $15,000 as a contingent liability for the settlement of potential indemnification claims, which is included in “Accrued expenses” in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017. The escrow funds will be used to satisfy a portion of this settlement. See Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies, for further information.



5.8.    Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment consisted of the following:following (in thousands, except useful lives):

Estimated
Useful
Estimated
Useful
December 31,
Life (years)20232022
Estimated
Useful
 December 31,
Life (years) 2017 2016
Computer and telecom equipment3  5 $35,915
 $31,854
Software3  5 32,989
 26,883
Computer, office and telecommunications equipment
Monitoring equipment
Leasehold improvements
Shorter of 7 years or
lease term
 17,890
 16,720
Construction and development in progress
Automobiles
Furniture and fixtures5  10 6,416
 8,070
Automobiles  5   3,797
 3,597
Construction and development in progress  N/A   13,384
 5,831
      110,391
 92,955
Buildings
Land
Total property and equipment
Less accumulated depreciation      60,014
 46,735
Total property and equipment, net      $50,377
 $46,220
  
Depreciation expense from continuing operations was $18,542, $18,038$25.0 million, $20.1 million and $14,488$12.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015,2021, respectively.

9. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
 
The Company soldtests goodwill for impairment for its reporting units annually as of July 1 or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. The Company reviews its intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the buildingcarrying value of an asset group may not be recoverable.

Goodwill
Changes in key assumptions from the prior year annual goodwill assessment and landthe resulting reduction in projected future cash flows included in the current year goodwill test resulted in a decrease in the fair values of the Company's PCS and RPM reporting units such that included holding company office space in Arizona effective December 31, 2016 resulting in an assetthe fair value of each respective reporting unit was less than its respective carrying value. As a result, during the second quarter of 2023, the Company recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $1,415$183.1 million, of which $137.3 million was recorded in the PCS reporting unit and $45.8 million in the RPM reporting unit. This goodwill impairment charge is recorded in “Impairment of goodwill” on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company recorded an asset2023. There was no such goodwill impairment charge of $9,983 forin the year ended December 31, 2016 related to its WD Services segment based on its review of the carrying value of long-lived assets.2022 or 2021. The current year impairment charges are reflected in “Asset impairment charge”was driven primarily by macroeconomic factors, including a decline in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2016. See Note 6, Goodwill and Intangibles¸ for further discussion of the impairment charges incurred related to the WD Services segment during 2016. Construction in progress as of December 31, 2017 is primarily comprised of NET Services, which has incurred substantial software development costs for its LCAD NextGen technology system. Such amounts are expected to be placed into service during 2018.

6. Goodwill and Intangibles
Impairment
The Company did not record any impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2017. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company reviewed WD Services for impairment, primarily due to lower than expected volumes and unfavorable service mix shifts under a large contract in the United Kingdom (“UK”) impacting future projections; additional clarity into the anticipated size and structure of the Work and Health Programme in the UK; the absence of additional details regarding the restructuring of the offender rehabilitation contract in the UK; and a change in senior management at WD Services during the fourth quarter. As a result, the Company performed a quantitative test comparing the fairmarket value of the asset groupings comprising WD ServicesCompany's common stock. After recording the impairment charge, the associated reporting units have $650.3 million of goodwill remaining. If, among other factors, (i) the Company's equity values were to decline significantly, (ii) the Company experienced additional adverse impacts associated with macroeconomic factors, including increases in our estimated weighted average cost of capital, or (iii) the adverse impacts stemming from competition, economic, regulatory or other factors were to cause the Company's results of operations or cash flows to be worse than currently anticipated, the Company could conclude in future periods that additional impairment charges of certain reporting units are required in order to reduce the carrying amounts and recorded an asset impairment chargevalues of $4,381 to definite-lived customer relationship intangible assets, which is recorded in “Asset impairment charge” on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. In addition, the Company reviewed the carrying value of goodwill of WD Services, noting the carrying value exceeded the fair value. Therefore, the Company performed the second step of the impairment test, in which the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities, on a fair value basis, with any excess representing the implied value of goodwill of the reporting unit. The fair value was determined using an income approach, which estimates the present value of future cash flows based on management’s forecast of revenue growth rates and operating margins, working capital requirements and capital expenditures. Based on this analysis, the carrying value of goodwill of the WD Services reporting unit exceeded the implied fair value and the Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $5,224, which is included in “Asset impairment charge” on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. The Company reviewed the carrying value of other long-lived assets and goodwill, and noted no indicators of impairment for NET Services or the Matrix Investment during the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company recorded $1,593 ofgoodwill. Any such impairment charges related to its Human Services segment during the year ended December 31, 2015, which is included in “Discontinued operations, net of tax” in the consolidated statements of income.could be significant.


Goodwill

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:
by reportable segment are presented in the following table (in thousands):
104


 
NET
Services
 
WD
Services
 
Consolidated
Total
Balances at December 31, 2015     
Goodwill$191,215
 $40,784
 $231,999
Accumulated impairment losses(96,000) (6,041) (102,041)
 95,215
 34,743
 129,958
      
Asset impairment charge
 (5,224) (5,224)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
 (5,110) (5,110)
Balances at December 31, 2016     
Goodwill191,215
 35,674
 226,889
Accumulated impairment losses(96,000) (11,265) (107,265)
 95,215
 24,409
 119,624
      
Foreign currency translation adjustment
 2,044
 2,044
Balances at December 31, 2017     
Goodwill191,215
 37,718
 228,933
Accumulated impairment losses(96,000) (11,265) (107,265)
 $95,215
 $26,453
 $121,668
NEMTPCSRPMCorporate and OtherTotal
Balances at December 31, 2021
Goodwill$231,186 $552,833 $236,738 $30 $1,020,787 
Accumulated impairment losses(96,000)— — — (96,000)
$135,186 $552,833 $236,738 $30 $924,787 
Balances at December 31, 2022
Goodwill acquired in GMM acquisition$— $— $43,689 $— $43,689 
Purchase accounting adjustments for Care Finders, VRI, and GMM— (58)236 — 178 
$135,186 $552,775 $280,663 $30 $968,654 
Balances at December 31, 2023
Impairment of goodwill— (137,331)(45,769)— (183,100)
$135,186 $415,444 $234,894 $30 $785,554 
 
The total amount of goodwill that was deductible for income tax purposes related to acquisitions as of December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 was $4,222.$317.3 million and $312.6 million, respectively.


Impairment

The Company recorded goodwill impairment charges of $183.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 and did not record any goodwill or intangible asset impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2022 or 2021. The accumulated impairment losses on goodwill totaled $279.1 million as of December 31, 2023 and $96.0 million as of December 31, 2022.
Intangible Assets
 
Intangible assets are comprised of acquired customer relationships,payor networks, trademarks and trade names, developed technology, non-compete agreements, licenses, and developed technology. Intangiblean assembled workforce. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the assets. These finite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are tested for impairment annually and more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that indicate an asset may be impaired. Based on the continued value of the definite-lived and indefinite-lived intangible assets acquired, the Company did not identify any circumstances during the years ended December 31, 2023 or 2022 that would require an impairment test for our intangible assets.

As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, intangible assets consisted of the following:following (in thousands, except estimated useful lives):
        
105


   December 31,
   2017 2016
 
Estimated
Useful
Life (Yrs)
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Customer relationships15 $48,128
 $(33,136) $48,020
 $(29,941)
Customer relationships10 30,583
 (11,871) 27,915
 (8,147)
Trademarks and Trade Names10 14,525
 (5,205) 13,282
 (3,431)
Developed technology5 3,228
 (2,313) 2,951
 (1,525)
Total  $96,464
 $(52,525) $92,168
 $(43,044)
  December 31,
  20232022
Estimated
Useful
Life (Yrs)
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Payor networks3 - 15$540,298 $(209,560)$539,960 $(147,980)
Trademarks and trade names2 - 1048,541 (34,978)48,541 (20,836)
Developed technology3 - 1029,389 (14,732)28,978 (11,618)
Non-compete agreement2 - 51,610 (730)1,610 (408)
New York LHCSA PermitIndefinite770 — 770 — 
Assembled workforce6 - 10444 (117)444 (52)
Total$621,052 $(260,117)$620,303 $(180,894)
 
The gross carrying amount as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 includes the asset impairment charge of $4,381 to definite-lived customer relationship intangible assets of WD Services recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016. The weighted-average amortization period at December 31, 20172023 for intangibles was 12.37.7 years. No significant residual value is estimated for these intangible assets. Amortization expense from continuing operations was $7,927, $8,566$79.2 million, $80.4 million and $9,510$44.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015,2021, respectively.




The total amortization expense is estimated to be as follows for the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 2017 based upon the applicable foreign exchange rates as of December 31, 2017:2023 (in thousands):
                       
YearAmount
2024$78,583 
202564,382 
202655,781 
202751,226 
202844,439 
Total$294,411 


106
Year Amount
2018 $8,126
2019 7,749
2020 7,473
2021 7,387
2022 7,025
Thereafter 6,179
Total $43,939


7.10.    Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
 
Accrued expenses consistedand other current liabilities were comprised of the following:following (in thousands):
 December 31,
 20232022
Accrued compensation and related liabilities$48,033 $47,947 
Insurance reserves22,014 17,836 
Accrued operating expenses15,884 18,432 
Accrued interest10,498 10,643 
Accrued legal fees10,148 15,574 
Accrued government grants(1)
9,156 7,367 
Union pension obligation1,573 3,665 
Deferred revenue2,629 2,202 
Other7,966 12,194 
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities$127,901 $135,860 
 December 31,
 2017 2016
Accrued compensation and related$33,653
 $23,050
NET Services accrued contract payments17,487
 32,836
Accrued settlement15,000
 6,000
Income taxes payable3,723
 372
Other33,975
 40,123
Total accrued expenses$103,838
 $102,381

8. Restructuring, Redundancyand Related Reorganization Costs
WD Services has two active redundancy programs at December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2017, WD Services had four redundancy programs. Of these four redundancy plans, two were approved(1)     Accrued government grants include payments received from government entities in 2015 and have been completed; a plan relatedrelation to the termination of employees delivering services under an offender rehabilitation program (“Offender Rehabilitation Program”)PRF and a planSLFRF to offset lost revenue or increased expenditures for which the related toexpenditure has not yet been incurred and thus the termination of employees delivering services under the Company’s employability and skills training programs and certain other employees in the United Kingdom (“UK Restructuring Program”). In addition, a redundancy plan related to the termination of employees as part of a value enhancement project (“Ingeus Futures’ Program”) to better align costs with revenue for certain contracts in the UK and to improve overall operating performance was approved in 2016 and a further redundancy program to align costs with revenue for offender rehabilitation services (“Delivery First Program”) was approved in the fourth quarter of 2017. The Company recorded severance and related charges of $2,577 and $8,511 during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, relating to the termination benefits for employee groups and specifically identified employees impacted by these plans. The severance charges incurredpayments are recorded as “Service expense” in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
The initial estimates of severance and related charges for the plans were based upon the employee groups impacted, average salary and benefits, and redundancy benefits pursuant to the existing policies. Additional charges above the initial estimates were incurred for the redundancy plans related to the actualization of termination benefits for specifically identified employees impacted under these plans, as well as an increase in the number of individuals impacted by these plans. The final identification of the employees impacted by each program is subject to customary consultation procedures. In addition, additional phases of value enhancement projects may be undertaken in the future, if costs and revenue are not aligned.


Summary of Severance and Related Charges
 
January 1,
2017
 
Costs
Incurred
 Cash Payments 
Foreign Exchange
Rate Adjustments
 December 31, 2017
Ingeus Futures' Program$2,486
 $1,223
 $(3,386) $159
 $482
Offender Rehabilitation Program1,380
 (40) (1,357) 17
 
UK Restructuring Program50
 (53) 
 3
 
Delivery First Program
 1,447
 (184) 24
 1,287
Total$3,916
 $2,577
 $(4,927) $203
 $1,769
 
January 1,
2016
 
Costs
Incurred
 Cash Payments 
Foreign Exchange
Rate Adjustments
 December 31, 2016
Ingeus Futures' Program$
 $2,515
 $
 $(29) $2,486
Offender Rehabilitation Program6,538
 4,865
 (8,924) (1,099) 1,380
UK Restructuring Program2,059
 1,131
 (3,031) (109) 50
Total$8,597
 $8,511
 $(11,955) $(1,237) $3,916
The total of accrued severance and related costs of $1,769 and $3,916 are reflected in “Accrued expenses” in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The amount accrueddeferred as of December 31, 2017 for the Ingeus Futures’ Program2023 and Delivery First Program is expected to be settled principally during 2018.2022.

9. Long-Term Obligations11. Debt

The Company’s long-term obligations were as follows:  Senior Unsecured Notes

 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
    
$200,000 revolving loan, LIBOR plus 2.25% - 3.25% with interest payable at least once every three months through August 2018$
 $
Capital lease obligations2,984
 3,611
 2,984
 3,611
Less current portion of capital lease obligations2,400
 1,721
Total long-term obligations, less current portion$584
 $1,890
Annual maturities of capital lease obligationsSenior unsecured notes as of December 31, 20172023 and 2022 consisted of the following (in thousands):

December 31,
Senior Unsecured NoteDate of Issuance20232022
$500.0 million 5.875% due November 15, 2025 (effective interest rate 6.524%)11/4/2020$494,011 $491,098 
$500.0 million 5.000% due October 1, 2029 (effective interest rate 5.405%)8/24/2021489,746 488,263 
Total$983,757 $979,361 

The Senior Notes due 2025 and the Senior Notes due 2029 (collectively, the "Notes") were issued pursuant to two indentures, dated November 4, 2020 and August 24, 2021, respectively, between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. The Senior Notes due 2025 relate to the Company’s acquisition of Simplura and the Senior Notes due 2029 relate to the Company’s acquisition of VRI. The fair value of the Notes as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 was $909.2 million and $896.6 million, respectively, which was determined based on quoted prices in active markets, and therefore designated as Level 1 within the valuation hierarchy.

The Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company's future subordinated indebtedness, rank equally in right of payment with all of the Company's existing and future senior indebtedness, are effectively subordinated to any of the Company's existing and future secured indebtedness, including indebtedness under the New Credit Facility, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, and are structurally subordinated to all of the existing and future liabilities (including trade payables) of each of the Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries.

The indentures for the Notes contain covenants that, among other things, restrict the Company’s ability and the ability of its restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: incur additional indebtedness or issue disqualified capital stock; make certain investments; create or incur certain liens; enter into certain transactions with affiliates; merge, consolidate, amalgamate or transfer substantially all of its assets; agree to dividend or other payment restrictions affecting its restricted subsidiaries; and transfer or sell assets, including capital stock of its restricted subsidiaries. These covenants, however, are subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications, and certain covenants may be suspended in the event the Notes are assigned an investment grade rating from two of three rating agencies. The indentures for both the Senior Notes due 2025 and the Senior Notes due 2029 provide that the notes may become subject to redemption under certain circumstances.
107



In 2024 and thereafter, the Company may redeem all or a part of the Senior Notes due 2025 upon not less than ten days’ nor more than 60 days’ notice, at 100.0% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the Notes redeemed, to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date.

The Company may also redeem the Senior Notes due 2029, in whole or in part, at any time prior to October 1, 2024, at a price equal to 100.0% of the principal amount of the notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the date of redemption plus a “make-whole” premium set forth in the Indenture. In addition, the Company may redeem up to 40.0% of the Senior Notes due 2029 prior to October 1, 2024, at a redemption price of 105.0% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the date of redemption, with the proceeds of certain equity offerings, subject to certain conditions as specified in the Indenture Agreement.

On or after October 1, 2024, the Company may redeem all or a part of the Senior Notes due 2029 upon not less than ten nor more than 60 days’ notice, at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on the Notes redeemed, to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on October 1 of the years indicated below:

YearPercentage
2024102.500%
2025101.250%
2026 and thereafter100.000%

The Company will pay interest on the Senior Notes due 2025 at 5.875% per annum until maturity. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, with the first interest payment date being May 15, 2021. Principal payments are not required until the maturity date on November 15, 2025 when 100.0% of the outstanding principal will be required to be repaid.

Pursuant to the Senior Notes due 2029, the Company will pay interest on the notes at 5.0% per annum until maturity. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year. Principal payments are not required until the maturity date on October 1, 2029 when 100.0% of the outstanding principal will be required to be repaid. As a part of the bond issuance process, we incurred a $6.6 million bridge commitment fee that provided a potential funding backstop in the event that the Notes did not meet the desired subscription level to be used to acquire VRI. That commitment expired unused upon closing of the Notes and the fee was expensed in the third quarter of 2021.

In relation to the issuance of the Senior Notes due 2025, debt issuance costs of $14.5 million were incurred at the date of issuance and these costs were deferred and are amortized to interest cost over the term of the Notes. Additionally, in relation to the issuance of the Senior Notes due 2029, debt issuance costs of $13.5 millionwere incurred at the date of issuance and these costs were deferred and are amortized to interest cost over the term of the Notes. As of December 31, 2023, $16.2 million of unamortized deferred issuance costs was netted against the long-term debt balance on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of December 31, 2023.

Annual maturities on all long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2023, are as follows:

Maturities
2024$— 
2025500,000 
2026— 
2027— 
2028— 
Thereafter500,000 
Total maturities1,000,000 
Unamortized deferred issuance costs16,243 
Total long-term debt$983,757 

108

Year Amount
2018 $2,400
2019 504
2020 80
Total $2,984



Credit Facility

The Company iswas a party to thean amended and restated credit and guaranty agreement, dated as of August 2, 2013 (as amended, the “Credit“Old Credit Agreement”), with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and letter of credit issuer, and the other lenders party thereto. On September 13, 2021, the Company entered into the Ninth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement (the “Ninth Amendment”), which among other things, amended the Old Credit Facility to permit the incurrence of additional debt to finance the acquisition of VRI and revise financial covenants therein to permit the consummation of the VRI acquisition. The amount available under the revolving credit facility (the “Old Credit Facility”) included an aggregate principal amount of $225.0 million, with a sub-facility for letters of credit of $40.0 million.

On February 3, 2022, the Company terminated its Old Credit Facility and entered into the New Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and an issuing bank, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as an issuing bank, Truist Bank and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as co-syndication agents, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, Bank of America, N.A., Regions Bank, Bank of Montreal and Capital One, National Association, as co-documentation agents, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Truist Securities, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as joint bookrunners and joint lead arrangers, and the other lenders party thereto. The New Credit Agreement provides the Company with a $200,000 revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), including a sub-facilitythe New Credit Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $25,000$325.0 million. The New Credit Facility includes sublimits for swingline loans, letters of credit. credit and alternative currency loans in amounts of up to $25.0 million, $60.0 million and $75.0 million, respectively. The New Credit Facility matures on February 3, 2027 and the proceeds may be used (i) to finance working capital needs of the Company and its subsidiaries and (ii) for general corporate purposes of the Company and its subsidiaries (including to finance capital expenditures, permitted acquisitions and investments).

On June 26, 2023, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the New Credit Agreement which amended the maximum permitted Total Net Leverage Ratio under the New Credit Agreement as follows: for the fiscal quarters ending June 30, 2023 through September 30, 2023, 5.25:1.00; for the fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2023 through March 31, 2024, 5.00:1.00; for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2024, 4.75:1.00; and for the fiscal quarters ending September 30, 2024 and for the fiscal quarters ending thereafter, 4.50:1.00.

On February 22, 2024, the Company entered into the Second Amendment to the New Credit Agreement, which amended the maximum permitted Total Net Leverage Ratio under the New Credit Agreement as follows: for the fiscal quarters ending March 31, 2024 through June 30, 2024, 5.50:1.00; for the fiscal quarters ending September 30, 2024 through December 31, 2024, 5.25:1.00; for the fiscal quarters ending March 31, 2025 through September 30, 2025, 5.00:1.00, and for the fiscal quarters ending December 31, 2025 through March 31, 2026, 4.75:1.00. The Second Amendment also restricts the Company from permitting its Liquidity (as defined in the Second Amendment and which is determined generally to be, as of any date of determination, the sum of the Company's available borrowing capacity under the New Credit Facility plus the amount of its unencumbered cash), to be less than $100.0 million as of the last day of each fiscal quarter.

As of December 31, 2017,2023, the Company had no$113.8 million of short-term borrowings outstanding on the New Credit Facility and sevenhad $40.4 million of outstanding letters of credit in the amount of $11,074 outstanding under the revolving credit facility. AtNew Credit Facility. The interest rate for short-term borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2017,2023 was 9.6% per annum. As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s availableCompany did not have any short-term borrowings outstanding on the New Credit Facility and had $38.1 million of outstanding letters of credit under the revolving credit facility was $188,926. New Credit Facility.

Under the New Credit Agreement,Facility, the Company has an option to request an increase in the amount of the revolving credit facilityNew Credit Facility or obtain incremental term loans from time to time (on substantially the same terms as apply to the existing facilities) inby an aggregate amount of up to $75,000 with either additional commitments from lenders under the Credit Agreement at such time or new commitments from financial institutions acceptable to the administrative agent in its reasonable discretion,$175.0 million, so long as, no defaultafter giving effect to the relevant incremental facility, the pro forma secured net leverage ratio does not exceed 3.50:1.00, provided that the lenders agree to increase their existing commitments or event of default exists at the time of anyto participate in such increase.incremental term loans. The Company may not be ableprepay the New Credit Facility in whole or in part, at any time without premium or penalty, subject to access additional funds under this increase optionreimbursement of the lenders’ breakage and redeployment costs in connection with prepayments of Term Benchmark loans or RFR loans, each as no lender is obligated to participatedefined in any such increasethe New Credit Agreement. The unutilized portion of the commitments under the Credit Facility. TheNew Credit Facility matures on August 2, 2018.may be irrevocably reduced or terminated by the Company at any time without penalty.


Interest on the outstanding principal amount of the loans accrues at the Company’s election, at a per annum rate equal to LIBOR, plus an applicable margin,the Alternate Base Rate, the Adjusted Term SOFR Rate, the Adjusted Daily Simple SOFR Rate, the Adjusted EURIBOR Rate or the base rateAdjusted Daily Simple SONIA Rate, as applicable and each as defined in the agreementNew Credit Agreement, in each case, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin ranges from 2.25%1.75% to 3.25%3.50% in the case of LIBORTerm Benchmark loans or RFR loans, and 1.25%0.75% to 2.25%2.50% in the case of the base rateAlternate Base Rate loans, in each case, based on the Company’s consolidatedtotal net leverage ratio as defined in the New Credit Agreement. Interest on the loans is payable quarterly in arrears.arrears in the case of Alternate Base Rate loans, on the last day
109


of the relevant interest period in the case of Term Benchmark loans, and monthly in arrears in the case of RFR loans. In addition, the Company is obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee based on a percentage of the unused portion of each lender’s commitment under the Credit Facilityrevolving credit facility and quarterly letter of credit fees based on a percentage of the maximum amount available to be drawn under each outstanding letter of credit. The commitment fee and letter of credit fee range from 0.25%0.30% to 0.50% and 2.25%1.75% to 3.25%3.50%, respectively, in each case, based on the Company’s consolidatedtotal net leverage ratio.


The Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by all of the Company’s present and future domestic subsidiaries, excluding certain domestic subsidiaries which include the Company’s insurance captive. The Company’s obligations under, and each guarantor’s obligations under its guaranty of, the Credit Facility are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s respective assets, including a pledge of 100% of the issued and outstanding stock of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries, excluding the Company’s insurance captive, and 65% of the issued and outstanding stock of the Company’s first tier foreign subsidiaries.

TheNew Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. The negative covenants include restrictions on the Company’s ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, create liens, make investments, give guarantees, pay dividends, sell assets and merge and consolidate. The Company is subject to financial covenants, including consolidatedtotal net leverage, minimum liquidity and consolidated interest coverage covenants.
Capital Leases
NET Services has seven capital leases for information technology hardware and software with termination dates ranging from January 2018 through October 2020. The terms of the leases are between 12 and 36 months, with interest recorded at an incremental borrowing rate of 3.28%. At December 31, 2017, $6,045 represents equipment under capital leases and $1,642 represents accumulated depreciation recognized on this leased equipment.
10. Convertible Preferred Stock, Net

The Company completed a rights offering on February 5, 2015 (the “Rights Offering”) providingCompany’s obligations under the New Credit Facility are guaranteed by all of the Company’s existing common stock holderspresent and future material domestic subsidiaries, excluding certain material domestic subsidiaries that are excluded from being guarantors pursuant to the non-transferrable right to purchase their pro rata shareterms of $65,500the New Credit Agreement. The Company’s obligations under, and each guarantor’s obligations under its guaranty of, convertible preferred stock atthe New Credit Facility are secured by a price equal to $100.00 per share (“Preferred Stock”). The Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of Providence’s Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”) at a conversion price equal to $39.88 per share, which was the closing pricefirst priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s Common Stock onor such guarantor’s respective assets. If an event of default occurs, the NASDAQ Global Select Market on October 22, 2014.
Stockholders exercised subscription rightsrequired lenders may cause the administrative agent to purchase 130,884 sharesdeclare all unpaid principal and any accrued and unpaid interest and all fees and expenses under the New Credit Facility to be immediately due and payable. All amounts outstanding under the New Credit Facility will automatically become due and payable upon the commencement of the Company's Preferred Stock. Pursuantany bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings. The New Credit Agreement also contains a cross default to the terms and conditions of the Standby Purchase Agreement (the “Standby Purchase Agreement”) between Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P., Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P. and Blackwell Partners, LLC (collectively, the “Standby Purchasers”) and the Company, the remaining 524,116 sharesany of the Company’s Preferred Stock were purchased by the Standby Purchasers at the $100.00 per share subscription price.indebtedness having a principal amount in excess of $40.0 million. The Company received $65,500was in aggregate gross proceeds fromcompliance with all covenants under the consummation of the Rights Offering and Standby Purchase Agreement. Additionally, on March 12, 2015, the Standby Purchasers exercised their right to purchase an additional 150,000 shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock, at a purchase price of $105.00


per share or a total purchase price of $15,750, of the same series and having the same conversion priceNew Credit Agreement as the Preferred Stock sold in the Rights Offering.
The Company may pay a noncumulative cash dividend on each share of Preferred Stock, if and when declared by a committee of its Board of Directors (“Board”), at the rate of five and one-half percent (5.5%) per annum on the liquidation preference then in effect. On or before the third business day immediately preceding each fiscal quarter, the Company must determine its intention whether or not to pay a cash dividend with respect to that ensuing quarter and will give notice of its intention to each holder of Preferred Stock as soon as practicable thereafter.
In the event the Company does not declare and pay a cash dividend, the Company will declare a payment in kind (“PIK”) dividend by increasing the liquidation preference of the convertible Preferred Stock to an amount equal to the liquidation preference in effect at the start of the applicable dividend period, plus an amount equal to the liquidation preference then in effect multiplied by eight and one-half percent (8.5%) per annum, computed on the basis of a 365-day year and the actual number of days elapsed from the start of the applicable dividend period to the applicable date of determination. All holders of the Company’s Preferred Stock are able to convert their Preferred Stock into shares of Common Stock at a rate of approximately 2.51 shares of Common Stock for each share of Preferred Stock. As of December 31, 2017, 1,800 shares of Preferred Stock have been converted to 4,510 shares of Common Stock.2023.


Cash dividends are payable quarterly in arrears on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year, and commenced on April 1, 2015, and, if declared, begin to accrue on the first day of the applicable dividend period. PIK dividends, if applicable, accrue cumulatively on the same schedule as set forth above for cash dividends and are also compounded at the applicable annual rate on each applicable subsequent dividend date. Cash dividends on redeemable convertible preferred stock totaling $4,418, or $5.50 per share, $4,419, or $5.50 per share, and $3,928, or $4.88 per share, were distributed to convertible preferred stockholders for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The Preferred Stock is accounted for outside of stockholders’ equity as it may be redeemed upon certain change in control events that are not solely in the control of the Company. Dividends are recorded in stockholders’ equity and consist of the 5.5%/8.5% dividend. At the time of issuance of the Preferred Stock, the Company recorded a discount on Preferred Stock related to beneficial conversion features that arose due to the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock being higher than the conversion price of the Preferred Stock on the commitment date. The amortization of this discount was recorded in stockholders’ equity. The discount was fully amortized as of June 30, 2015.
The following table summarizes the Preferred Stock activity for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:  
 Dollar Value Share Count
Balance at December 31, 2015$77,576
 803,518
Conversion to common stock(12) (120)
Allocation of issuance costs1
 
Balance at December 31, 2016$77,565
 803,398
Conversion to common stock(20) (198)
Allocation of issuance costs1
 
Balance at December 31, 2017$77,546
 803,200
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock were convertible into 2,014,042 and 2,014,538 shares of Common Stock, respectively.
11.12.    Stockholders’ Equity

At December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 there were 17,473,59819,775,041 and 17,315,66119,729,923 shares of the Company’s Common Stock issued, respectively, including 4,126,1325,571,004 and 3,478,6765,573,529 treasury shares at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively.

Subject to the rights specifically granted to holders of any then outstanding shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock, the Company’s common stockholders are entitled to vote together as a class on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s common stockholders, and are entitled to any dividends that may be declared by the Board. The Company’s common stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights. Upon the Company’s dissolution, liquidation or winding up, holders of the Company’s Common Stock are entitled to share ratably in the Company’s net assets after payment or provision for all liabilities and any


preferential liquidation rights of the Company’s Preferred Stock then outstanding. The Company’s common stockholders do not have preemptive rights to purchase shares of the Company’s stock. The issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock are not subject to any redemption provisions and are not convertible into any other shares of the Company’s capital stock. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of the Company’s Common Stock will be subject to those of the holders of any shares of the Company’s Preferred Stock the Company may issue in the future.

The following table reflects the total numberAs of December 31, 2023, 586,696 shares of the Company’s Common Stockcommon stock were reserved for future issuanceissuances related to the exercise of stock options that were outstanding and restricted stock units and awards that were unvested as of December 31, 2017:2023.

Purchases of Equity Securities
Shares of common stock reserved for:
Exercise of stock options and restricted stock awards681,608
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock2,014,042
Issuance of Performance Restricted Stock Units18,122
Total shares of common stock reserved for future issuance2,713,772
Share Repurchases 


On October 14, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement to repurchase 707,318 of its Common Stock held by former stockholders of Matrix for an aggregate purchase price of $29,000 (or $41.00 per share). The Company funded this purchase through a combination of borrowing on its Credit Facility and cash on hand. The purchase of these shares was completed on October 30, 2015.
On November 4, 2015,March 8, 2021, the Board authorized a new stock repurchase program under which the Company to engage in a repurchase program tocould repurchase up to $70,000$75.0 million in aggregate value of the Company’s Common Stock during the twelve-month period following November 4, 2015. This planthrough December 31, 2021, unless terminated on November 3, 2016.earlier. A total of 1,360,249276,268 shares were purchased through this planrepurchased under the program for $62,981, excluding commission payments.$40.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2021.


On October 26, 2016, the Board authorized a newNo repurchase program under which the Company may repurchase up to $100,000 in aggregate value of the Company’s Common Stockwas authorized during the twelve-month period following October 26, 2016. Through October 26, 2017, a total of 770,808 shares were purchased through this plan for $30,360, excluding commission payments.

On November 2, 2017, the Board approved the extension of the Company’s October 26, 2016 stock repurchase program, authorizing the Company to engage in a repurchase program to repurchase up to $69,640 (the amount remaining from the $100,000 repurchase amount authorized in 2016) in aggregate value of our Common Stock throughyears ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2017, 180,270 shares were purchased under this plan after it was extended on November 2, 2017 for $10,503, excluding commission payments.2023 or 2022.

Equity Award Withholding

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015,2021, the Company withheld 19,556, 2,73610,565, 7,486 and 15,9615,432 shares, respectively, from employees to cover the settlement of income tax and related benefit withholding obligations arising from vesting of restricted stock awards. In addition, during the years ended December 31, 2017awards and 2015, the Company withheld 5,665 and 5,718 shares, respectively, from employees to cover the settlement of income tax and related benefit withholding obligations and the exercise price upon the exercise of stock options. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company withheld 43,743 shares to cover the settlement of income tax and related benefit withholding obligations arising from shares held by employees that were released from escrow related to the Matrix acquisition, which shares are treated as treasury stock.units.


12.

110


13.    Stock-Based Compensation and Similar Arrangements

The Company provides stock-based compensation to employees, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors under the Company’s 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”). The 2006 Plan allows the flexibility to grant or award stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, unrestricted stock, stock units including restricted stock units and performance awards to eligible persons.




The following table summarizes the activity under the 2006 Plan as of December 31, 2017:2023:

Number of shares
of the Company’s Common Stock authorized for
Number of shares
of the Company’s
Common Stock remaining for
Number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock subject to
 issuancefuture grantsStock OptionsStock Grants
2006 Plan5,400,000 792,338 82,586 504,110 
 
Number of shares
of the Company's Common Stock authorized for
 
Number of shares
of the Company's
Common Stock remaining for
 Number of shares of the Company's Common Stock subject to
 issuance future grants Stock Options Stock Grants
2006 Plan5,400,000
 1,938,666
 606,695
 111,157

The following table reflects the amount of stock-basedStock-based compensation for share settled awards issued to employees and non-employee directors,is recorded in each financialthe "General and administrative expense" line item on the consolidated statement line itemof operations for a total expense of $6.5 million, $6.9 million, and $5.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017
2016
2015
Service expense$491
 $830
 $21,480
General and administrative expense7,052
 4,324
 5,027
Equity in net (gain) loss of investees76
 18
 
Discontinued operations, net of tax
 (18) 115
Total stock-based compensation$7,619
 $5,154
 $26,622
Stock-based compensation included in service expense is related to the following segments:
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
NET Services$434
 $841
 $724
WD Services (a)57
 (11) 20,756
Total stock-based compensation in service expense$491
 $830
 $21,480
(a)WD Services includes $16,078 for the year ended December 31, 2015 related to the acceleration of awards pursuant to the separation agreements for two executives.

The2021, respectively. These amounts above exclude tax benefits of $2,885, $2,072$1.8 million, $1.9 million and $2,322$1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015,2021, respectively.


Stock Options

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company did not grant any stock options. The fair value of each stock option awarded to employees is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing formula based on the following assumptions for the years ended December 31, 20172023, 2022, and 2015:2021:

 Year Ended December 31,
 202320222021
Expected dividend yield0.0%0.0%0.0%
Expected stock price volatility49.6%-49.6%39.6%-46.5%36.6%-41.6%
Risk-free interest rate3.7%-3.7%1.6%-4.4%0.3%-0.9%
Expected life of options (years)3.5-3.53.5-4.53.5-4.4
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2015
Expected dividend yield0.0% 0.0%
Expected stock price volatility19.45%42.95% 33.8%46.14%
Risk-free interest rate0.95%2.23% 0.4%1.35%
Expected life of options (years)0.036.50 0.034.00


The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury security rate in effect as of the date of grant which corresponds to the expected life of the award. The expected stock price volatility was based onand expected lives of the Company’s historical data. The expected


lives ofstock options were based on the Company’s historical data, a simplified method for plain vanilladata. Stock options orgranted under the Company’s best estimate where appropriate.2006 Plan vest ratably in equal annual installments over 3 to 4 years and expire after 5 to 7 years.

During the fourth quarter of 2017, James Lindstrom resigned from the Company as Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and board member of the Company. As a result of Mr. Lindstrom's resignation as CEO, a separation agreement was entered into between the Company and Mr. Lindstrom. As a result of this separation agreement, Mr. Lindstrom was granted 125,000 stock options with an exercise price of $61.33 per share that were immediately vested. The options are exercisable through December 31, 2018.

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, the Company issued 91,400549 shares of its Common Stock in connection with the exercise of employee stock options under the Company’s 2006 Plan.
 
The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2017:
2023:
111


 Year ended December 31, 2017
 
Number
of Shares
Under
Option
 
Weighted-
average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted-
average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Balance at beginning of period355,598
 $33.48
    
Granted371,775
 57.08
    
Exercised(115,825) 29.77
    
Forfeited/Cancelled(854) 46.44
    
Expired(3,999) 24.59
    
Outstanding at end of period606,695
 $48.70
 2.62 $6,705
Vested or expected to vest at end of period606,695
 $48.70
 2.62 $6,705
Exercisable at end of period357,984
 $44.65
 2.10 $5,508
 Year ended December 31, 2023
Number
of Shares
Under
Option
Weighted-
average
Exercise
Price
Weighted-
average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (in thousands)
Balance at beginning of year, January 1125,179 $115.54  
Granted11,809 53.10 
Exercised(549)56.43   
Forfeited/Canceled(32,101)117.99   
Expired(21,752)119.96   
Outstanding at end of year, December 3182,586 $104.89 2.68$— 
Vested or expected to vest at end of year, December 3182,586 $104.89 2.68$— 
Exercisable at end of year, December 3142,054 $113.18 1.93$— 

As of December 31, 2023, there was approximately $1.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to share settled stock options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining contractual term of 2.68 years, using the simplified method as permitted for plain vanilla options.
 
The weighted-average grant-dategrant date fair value for options granted, total intrinsic value and cash received by the Company related to options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 20152021 were as follows:follows (in thousands, except for fair value per share):
 Year ended December 31,
 202320222021
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share$56.43 $106.90 $170.26 
Options exercised:   
Total intrinsic value$(7)$3,057 $4,454 

 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share$9.05
 $
 $8.77
Options exercised:     
Total intrinsic value$2,010
 $979
 $6,659
Cash received$1,921
 $4,108
 $4,894
Stock Option Modifications
During the fourth quarter of 2017, as a result of the separation agreement between the Company and Mr. Lindstrom, Mr. Lindstrom's outstanding stock options from his grants of 11,319 on August 6, 2015 and 9,798 on March 15, 2017 were modified to accelerate the vesting date of both awards to November 15, 2017 and allow exercise of the stock options until December 31, 2018. As a result of the modification to the terms of the original stock options granted to Mr. Lindstrom, the Company recognized an accelerated expense of $83 on the award for the year ended December 31, 2017.

During the second quarter of 2015, Warren Rustand terminated his role as CEO and board member of the Company, but remained employed as a Senior Advisor through the end of 2015. As a result of Mr. Rustand’s termination as CEO, a separation agreement was entered into between the Company and Mr. Rustand. As a result of this separation agreement, Mr. Rustand’s outstanding stock options from his grant of 200,000 stock options on September 11, 2014 were modified to accelerate the vesting date for the second tranche of options from June 30, 2015 to June 5, 2015, and the exercise period for all vested options of 133,332 was lengthened. In addition, the third tranche of options, consisting of 66,668 options, was cancelled. As a result of the modifications


to the terms of the original stock options granted to Mr. Rustand, the Company recognized additional stock-based compensation expense of $737 for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units

The Board grants restricted stock awards (RSAs) and restricted stock units (RSUs) under the 2006 Plan. RSAs and RSUs vest ratably in equal annual installments over 1 to 4 years, or, for certain grants, over periods designated in the respective employee’s agreements or as determined by the Compensation Committee.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company granted 33,420 shares of restricted stock (“RSAs”) to non-employee directors of its Board, executive officers and certain key employees. The awards primarily vest in three equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant.

During the year ended December 31, 2017,2023, the Company issued 36,62348,485 shares of its Common Stock to non-employee directors, executive officers and key employees upon the vesting of certain RSAs granted in 2016, 2015 and 2014RSUs granted under the Company’s 2006 Plan. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, 10,134 shares were vested but not released due to an additional holding period required by the grant agreement.
 
The following table summarizes the activity of the shares and weighted-average grant date fair value of the Company’s unvested restricted Common StockRSAs and RSUs during the year ended December 31, 2017:2023:

SharesWeighted-average
grant date fair value
Non-vested at beginning of year, January 1105,088 $108.49 
Granted280,314 $36.63 
Vested(48,485)$99.33 
Forfeited or cancelled(38,843)$91.26 
Non-vested at end of year, December 31298,074 $44.65 

112

 Shares 
Weighted-average
grant date
fair value
    
Non-vested at beginning of period72,198
 $44.44
Granted33,420
 $43.91
Vested(36,623) $43.42
Forfeited or cancelled(4,216) $47.17
Non-vested at end of period64,779
 $44.82

As of December 31, 2017,2023, there was $4,331approximately $14.1 million of unrecognized compensation costcosts related to unvested share settled stock optionsnon-vested RSAs and RSAs granted under the 2006 Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.2 years. The total fair value of stock options and RSAs vested was $3,550, $1,383 and $3,709 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Other Restricted Stock Award Grants
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Board approved the grant of 596,915 RSAs to two individuals in connection with the Ingeus acquisition. The grants were made outside of the 2006 Plan, as they were related to the acquisition. However, since the term of the awards provided for vesting based on continued employment, the awards were accounted for as stock-based compensation. The shares necessary to settle these awards were placed in an escrow account in 2014, and were releasable from escrow in accordance with the vesting of the awards. Per the original terms of the agreements, the awards vested upon continued employment of the grantees, in four equal installments on the anniversary date of the grant. However, on October 15, 2015, the Company entered into agreements whereby the executives’ employment was terminated by mutual agreement and vesting was no longer based upon continued employment. The Company recognized $16,078 in stock-based compensation expense at the time of the modification, which otherwise would have been recognized over the remainder of the vesting period. Additionally, the Company recognized accelerated deferred compensation expense of $4,714 related to these agreements during the year ended December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2017, 149,228 underlying shares to settle the awards are held in the escrow account and will be released in 2018, although all expense was recognized as of December 31, 2015.
Restricted Stock Units
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company granted 5,930 restricted stock units to a key employee, related to the terms of a separation agreement,RSUs that vested on January 3, 2017. The units were settled through a cash payment of $304 during the year ended December 31, 2017. The award was liability classified, and the expense recorded was based upon the Company’s closing stock price at the end of each reporting period and the completed requisite service period.


Performance Restricted Stock Units
The Company had 18,122 performance restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) outstanding at December 31, 2017. These awards vest upon the Company or its segments meeting certain performance criteria over a set performance period as determined, and subject to adjustment, by the Company’s Compensation Committee of the Board. 13,262 of the outstanding PRSUs at December 31, 2017 have a performance criteria tied to the Company’s return on equity (“ROE”), with performance periods ending on December 31, 2017. The grantees will earn 33% of PRSUs granted if the ROE is 12% but less than 15%, and 100% of the PRSUs granted if the ROE is 15% or more. If ROE is less than 12%, no PRSUs will be earned. The Company has determined, subsequent to December 31, 2017, that none of these PRSUs, with a performance period ended December 31, 2017, will vest. 4,860 of the outstanding PRSUs at December 31, 2017 have a performance criteria tied to NET Services’ EBITDA and the Company’s EBITDA performance with performance periods ending on December 31, 2017. The Company expects all of these PRSUs, with a performance period ended December 31, 2017, to vest. Compensation expense (benefit) related to these awards totaled $19, ($270) and $613 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Cash Settled Awards
During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, the Company issued 3,097, 3,360 and 4,000 stock equivalent units (“SEUs”), which settle in cash upon vesting, to Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., in lieu of a grant to Christopher Shackelton, Chairman of the Board, for his service on the Board, which vest one-third upon each anniversary of the vesting date. The fair value of the SEUs is based on the closing stock price on the last day of the period and the completed requisite service period. The Company recorded $235, $287 and $588 of expense for SEUs during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 200,000 stock option equivalent units (“SOEUs”), with an exercise price of $43.81 per share, which settle in cash, to Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P in lieu of a grant to Christopher Shackelton, for other services rendered. All 200,000 SOEUs were outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2017. This award vested one-third upon grant, one-third on June 30, 2015 and one-third on June 30, 2016. No additional SOEUs were granted during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. The Company recorded $2,146 and $1,888 of expense for SOEUs during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2015, respectively, and a benefit of $1,517 during the year ended December 31, 2016. The expenses and benefit are included in “General and administrative expense” in the consolidated statements of income. The fair value of the SOEUs was estimated as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing formula and amortized over the option’s graded vesting periods with the following assumptions:
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Expected dividend yield0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Expected stock price volatility23.36%32.09% 35.71%41.82% 43.75%45.3%
Risk-free interest rate1.75%1.95% 1.11%1.64% 1.2%1.70%
Expected life of options (in years)0.752.75 1.03.00 2.754.75
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had a short-term liability of $3,938 and $1,764, respectively, in “Accrued expenses” in the consolidated balance sheet related to unexercised vested and unvested cash settled share-based payment awards. The cash settled share-based compensation benefit in total excluded tax expense of $492 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The cash settled share-based compensation expense in total excluded a tax benefit of $908 and $990 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2015. The unrecognized compensation cost for SEUs is expected to be recognized over a weighted average periodremaining contractual term of 0.8 years; however, the total expense for both SEUs and SOEUs will continue to be adjusted until the awards are settled.1.57 years.

Holdco Long-Term Incentive PlanPerformance-Based Restricted Stock Units

On August 6, 2015 (the “Award Date”), the Compensation Committee of theThe Board adopted the HoldCo LTIP under the 2006 Plan. The Holdco LTIP was designed to provide long-term performance based awardsgrants performance-based restricted stock units (PRSUs) to certain executive officers and key employees. PRSUs primarily have a three-year performance period, after which the number of Providence. Under the program, executives would receive shares of Providence Common Stockunderlying RSUs earned is determined based on the shareholderachievement of pre-established performance targets.

The following table summarizes the activity of the shares and weighted-average grant date fair value created in excess of an 8.0% compounded annual return between the Award Date andCompany's unvested PRSUs during the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Extraordinary Shareholder Value”). The Award Date value was calculated on the basis2023:

SharesWeighted-average
grant date fair value
Non-vested at beginning of year, January 119,810 $150.33 
Granted205,721 $38.21 
Vested— $— 
Forfeited or cancelled(19,495)$99.00 
Non-vested at end of year, December 31206,036 $43.24 

As of the Providence stock price equal to the volume weighted average of the common share price over the 90-day trading period ending on the Award Date. The Extraordinary Shareholder Value was calculated on the basis of the Providence stock price equal to the volume weighted average of the common share price


over the 90-day trading period ending on December 31, 2017. A pool for use in2023, there was approximately $8.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested PRSUs that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining contractual term of 2.55 years, assuming that the allocationperformance conditions continue to be probable of awardsachievement.

The total fair value of vested stock options, RSUs and RSAs, and PRSUs was created equal to 8.0% of the Extraordinary Shareholder Value.

Participants in the HoldCo LTIP would receive a percentage allocation of any such pool$11.7 million, $2.6 million and following determination of the size of the pool, would be entitled to a number of shares equal to their pro rata portion of the pool divided by the volume weighted average of the Company’s per share price over the 90-day trading period ending on December 31, 2017. Of the shares allocated, 60% would be issued to the participant on or shortly following determination of the pool, 25% would vest and be issued on the one-year anniversary of such determination date, subject to continued employment, and the remaining 15% would be issued on the second anniversary of the determination date, subject to continued employment.

It was determined that no shares would be distributed under the Holdco LTIP as the calculation of the pool amount was zero. $4,738, $3,319 and $1,353 of expense is included in “General and administrative expense” in the consolidated statements of income$3.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015,2021, respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

During the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company began offering an Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") available to eligible employees. Under terms of the plan, eligible employees may designate a dollar value or percentage of their compensation to be withheld through payroll deductions, up to a maximum of $25,000 in each plan year, for the purchase of common stock at 85.0% of the lower of the market price on the first or last day of the offering period. Purchases under this plan were for a total of 16,030 shares as of December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2017, the Company accelerated all remaining unrecognized compensation expense2023, 983,970 shares remain available for the Holdco LTIP as there was no further requisite service period associated with the award, resulting in an acceleration of expense of $1,053.

These awards were equity classified and the fair value of the awards was calculated using a Monte-Carlo simulation valuation model. The fair value of the awards granted in 2016 and 2015 were estimated using the following assumptions:future issuance under this plan.
  
113
 Year ended December 31,
 2016 2015
Forward interest rate0.24%2.71% 0.04%2.90%
Expected Volatility40.0% 45.0%
Dividend Yield—% —%
Fair Value of Total Pool$12,870 $12,590


13. Vertical Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Company established Long-Term Incentive Plans (“Vertical LTIPs”) for the Company’s operating segments, or verticals, during the fourth quarter of 2015. The Vertical LTIPs are consistent in their basic terms, but each were customized for specific aspects of the associated vertical. The awards pay in cash, however up to 50% of the award may be paid in unrestricted stock if the recipient elects this option when the Vertical LTIP offer letter is received. In addition, at the discretion of the Company, the recipients may be able to elect unrestricted stock in lieu of cash compensation at a later date. The Vertical LTIPs reward participants based on certain measures of free cash flow and EBITDA results adjusted as specified in the plan document. The awards vest in three installments: 60% of the award will pay out immediately following December 31, 2017, 25% one year following the performance period (i.e. December 31, 2018) and 15% two years following the performance period (i.e. December 31, 2019). Payout is subject to the participant remaining employed by the Company.

During 2017, the Company revised the structure of the NET Services long-term incentive plan. As a result, the Company finalized the amount payable under the plan at $2,956. The total value will be paid to the awarded participants per the terms of the original agreement and thus the remaining unamortized expense relating to this plan continues to be recognized over the remaining service period. As of December 31, 2017, unamortized compensation expense is $299. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, $816, $1,513 and $328 of expense, respectively, is included in “Service expense” in the consolidated statements of income related to this plan. At December 31, 2017, the liability for long-term incentive plans of the Company’s operating segments of $2,657 is reflected in “Accrued expenses” and “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheet.  At December 31, 2016, the liability for long-term incentive plans of the Company’s operating segments of $1,841 is reflected in “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheet.


14.  EarningsLoss Per Share
 
The following table details the computation of basic and diluted earningsloss per share:share (in thousands, except share and per share data):
 Year ended December 31,
 202320222021
Numerator:   
Net loss$(204,460)$(31,806)$(6,585)
Denominator:   
Denominator for basic earnings per share -- weighted-average shares14,173,957 14,061,839 14,054,060 
Effect of dilutive securities:   
Common stock options— — — 
Restricted stock units— — — 
Denominator for diluted earnings per share -- adjusted weighted-average shares assumed conversion14,173,957 14,061,839 14,054,060 
Loss per share:   
Basic loss per share$(14.43)$(2.26)$(0.47)
Diluted loss per share$(14.43)$(2.26)$(0.47)
 
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Numerator:     
Net income attributable to Providence$53,369
 $91,928
 $83,696
Less dividends on convertible preferred stock(4,419) (4,419) (3,935)
Less accretion of convertible preferred stock discount
 
 (1,071)
Less income allocated to participating securities(7,085) (13,135) (10,691)
Net income available to common stockholders$41,865
 $74,374
 $67,999
      
Continuing operations$47,848
 $(21,251) $(29,181)
Discontinued operations(5,983) 95,625
 97,180
 $41,865
 $74,374
 $67,999
      
Denominator:     
Denominator for basic earnings per share -- weighted-average shares13,602,140
 14,666,896
 15,960,905
Effect of dilutive securities:     
Common stock options66,314
 
 
Performance-based restricted stock units4,860
 
 
Denominator for diluted earnings per share -- adjusted weighted-average shares assumed conversion13,673,314
 14,666,896
 15,960,905
      
Basic earnings (loss) per share:     
Continuing operations$3.52
 $(1.45) $(1.83)
Discontinued operations(0.44) 6.52
 6.09
 $3.08
 $5.07
 $4.26
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:     
Continuing operations$3.50
 $(1.45) $(1.83)
Discontinued operations(0.44) 6.52
 6.09
 $3.06
 $5.07
 $4.26
The accretion of Preferred Stock discount in the table above related to a beneficial conversion feature of the Company’s Preferred Stock that was fully amortized as of June 30, 2015. Income allocated to participating securities is calculated by allocating a portion of net income attributable to Providence, less dividends on convertible stock, to the convertible preferred stockholders on a pro-rata as converted basis; however, the convertible preferred stockholders are not allocated losses.

The following weighted-average shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:

 Year ended December 31,
 202320222021
Stock options to purchase common stock100,499 118,260 56,291 
Restricted stock awards and restricted stock units87,056 58,831 1,178 
  
114
 Year ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Stock options to purchase common stock362,392
 22,638
 173,925
Convertible preferred stock803,323
 803,442
 700,241




15.    Operating Leases

The Company has non-cancelable contractual obligations in the form of operating leases forprimarily associated with office space related office equipment and other facilities. The leases expire in various years and generally provide for renewal options. In the normal course of business, it is expectedmanagement expects that these leases will be renewed or replaced by leases on other properties.
 
Certain operating leases provide for increases in future minimum annual rental payments based on defined increases in the Consumer Price Index, subject to certain minimum increases. Several of these lease agreements contain provisions for periods in which rent payments are reduced. The total amount of rental payments due over the lease term is being charged torecorded as rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The cumulative difference between rent expense recorded

To determine whether a contract contains a lease, the Company evaluates its contracts and verifies that there is an identified asset and that the Company, or the tenant, has the right to obtain substantially all the economic benefits from the use of the asset throughout the contract term and has the right to direct the use of the identified asset. If a contract is determined to contain a lease and the amount paid,Company is a lessee, the lease is evaluated to determine whether it is an operating or financing lease.

The discount rate used for continuing operations,each lease is determined by estimating an appropriate incremental borrowing rate. In estimating an incremental borrowing rate, the Company considers the debt information, credit rating, and interest rate on the revolving credit facility, which is collateralized by the Company's assets. Accordingly, the Company continues discounting its remaining operating lease payments for calculating its lease liability using a weighted-average discount rate of 5.43%. The Company applies this rate to its entire portfolio of leases on the basis that any adjustments to the rate for lease term or asset classification would not affect the interest rate charged under the debt or have a material effect on the discounted lease liability.

A summary of all lease classifications in our consolidated balance sheets is as follows (in thousands):

LeasesClassificationDecember 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Assets
Current operating lease assetsOperating lease ROU assets$39,776 $39,405 
Liabilities
Current:
   OperatingCurrent portion of operating lease liabilities$8,727 $9,640 
Long-term:
   OperatingOperating lease liabilities, less current portion33,784 32,088 
  Total lease liabilities$42,511 $41,728 

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $3,957 and $3,253, respectively, and is included in “Accrued expenses” and “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets.2023, future maturities of lease liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

Future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases for equipment and property with initial terms
Operating Leases
2024$10,434 
20258,664 
20267,275 
20275,894 
20285,403 
Thereafter13,121 
Total lease payments50,791 
Less: interest and accretion(8,280)
Present value of minimum lease payments42,511 
Less: current portion(8,727)
Long-term portion$33,784 

As of one year or more consisted of the following at December 31, 2017:
2022, future maturities of lease liabilities were as follows (in thousands):
115


 Operating
 Leases
2018$20,875
201913,376
20209,738
20218,022
20226,142
Thereafter3,939
Total future minimum lease payments$62,092

Operating Leases
2023$11,347 
20248,509 
20256,009 
20264,714 
20273,599 
Thereafter15,657 
Total lease payments49,835 
Less: interest and accretion(8,107)
Present value of minimum lease payments41,728 
Less: current portion(9,640)
Long-term portion$32,088 
Rent expense for continuing operations related to operating leases was $27,511, $29,316
The weighted-average remaining lease terms and $31,191, forweighted-average discount rates are as follows:

December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
   Operating lease costs4.184.84
Weighted-average discount rate:
   Operating lease costs5.43 %5.31 %

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023 and 2015, respectively. Also, the2022, our operating lease agreements generally require the Company to pay executory costs such as real estate taxes, insurance,cost was $13.0 million and repairs, which are recorded to expense as incurred.$13.8 million, respectively, and is primarily included in "Service expense” on our accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

16.    Retirement Plan
The Company maintains a qualified defined contribution plan under Section 401(k)A summary of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, for all employees of its NET Services operating segment and corporate personnel. The Company, at its discretion, may make a matching contribution to the plan. Any matching contributions vest over 5 years. Unvested matching contributions are forfeitable upon employee termination. Employee contributions are fully vested and non-forfeitable. The Company’s contributions to the plan for continuing operations were $320, $248 and $221, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
WD Services’ employees are entitled to benefits under certain retirement plans. The WD Services’ segment has separate plans in each country it operates. The plans receive fixed contributions from WD Services’ companies and the legal or constructive obligation is limited to these contributions, although the benefits the employees ultimately receive are determined by the plan administrators, which includes government entities and third-party administrators. The Company’s contributions to these plans were $8,219, $9,139 and $10,331 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company also maintains a Deferred Compensation Rabbi Trust Plan for highly compensated employees of NET Services. This plan was put in place to compensate for the inability of highly compensated employees to take full advantage of the Company’s 401(k) plan. Additionalother lease information is included in Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies.as follows (in thousands):



Year Ended December 31, 2023Year Ended December 31, 2022
Operating cash flows from operating leases$(12,636)$(12,492)
Amortization of operating lease ROU assets$12,344 $11,640 
ROU assets obtained through operating lease liabilities$12,715 $7,295 
17.
16.    Income Taxes
The following table summarizes our U.S. and foreign income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes:  
 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
US48,719
 65,559
 43,598
Foreign15,485
 (67,437) (53,692)
Total$64,204
 $(1,878) $(10,094)

The federal and state and foreign income tax provisionbenefit (provision) is summarized as follows:follows (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 202320222021
Federal income tax benefit (provision):   
Current$(10,296)$(22,651)$(6,642)
Deferred14,431 25,291 820 
  Total federal income tax benefit (provision)4,135 2,640 (5,822)
State income tax benefit (provision):   
Current(3,067)(11,500)(5,048)
Deferred3,251 11,895 2,253 
  Total state income tax benefit (provision)184 395 (2,795)
Total benefit (provision) for income taxes$4,319 $3,035 $(8,617)
116


 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Federal:     
Current$18,792
 $21,202
 $15,161
Deferred(19,767) (6,477) (1,606)
 (975) 14,725
 13,555
State:     
Current3,975
 4,580
 2,644
Deferred723
 (938) (38)
 4,698
 3,642
 2,606
Foreign:     
Current1,197
 266
 523
Deferred(519) (1,597) (2,101)
 678
 (1,331) (1,578)
      
Total provision for income taxes$4,401
 $17,036
 $14,583




A reconciliation of the provisionbenefit (provision) for income taxes with amounts determined by applying the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes is as follows:follows (in thousands):

 Year Ended December 31,
 202320222021
Federal statutory rates21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
Federal income tax benefit (provision) at statutory rates$43,904 $1,024 $(8,459)
Change in valuation allowance(507)648 (385)
Change in uncertain tax positions396 (390)929 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit637 (521)(1,717)
Non-taxable income— — 74 
Compensation expense(1,220)(251)(1,204)
Stock-based compensation(791)1,282 1,004 
Legal settlements(1,608)— — 
Meals and entertainment(154)(48)(30)
Transaction costs— — (89)
Tax credits2,258 1,864 1,095 
Goodwill impairment(38,451)— — 
Subsidiary deconsolidation gain— (148)— 
Life insurance expense128 (183)— 
Political activities(149)(197)— 
Other(124)(45)165 
Income tax benefit (provision)$4,319 $3,035 $(8,617)
Effective income tax rate2.1 %62.2 %21.4 %

117

 Year Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Federal statutory rates35% 35 % 35 %
Federal income tax at statutory rates$22,471
 $(657) $(3,533)
Revaluation of net deferred tax liabilities due to U.S. tax reform(19,397) 
 
U.S. tax reform impact on equity income of investee(1,646) 
 
Change in valuation allowance2,299
 9,480
 3,574
Change in uncertain tax positions7
 73
 (76)
State income taxes, net of federal benefit3,203
 2,396
 1,785
Difference between federal statutory and foreign tax rate(1,648) 9,427
 4,642
Stock compensation3,400
 
 (184)
Meals and entertainment100
 96
 81
Amortization of deferred consideration
 
 9,444
Transaction costs159
 
 (447)
Contingent consideration liability reversal
 
 (854)
Nontaxable income(1,203) 
 (965)
Tax credits(354) (947) (456)
Legal expense(805) 522
 284
Depreciation
 
 649
Equity in net loss of investee569
 624
 366
Sale of joint venture(6,021) 
 
Asset impairment
 2,353
 
Foreign exchange2,925
 (7,001) 
Other342
 670
 273
Provision for income taxes$4,401
 $17,036
 $14,583
Effective income tax rate7% (907)% (144)%

The Company recognized an income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 despite having losses from continuing operations before income taxes. Because of foreign net operating losses (including equity investee losses) for which the future income tax benefit currently cannot be recognized, and non-deductible expenses such as amortization of deferred consideration related to the Ingeus acquisition, the Company recognized estimated taxable income for these years upon which the income tax provision for financial reporting is calculated.



Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:follows (in thousands):



December 31, December 31,
2017 2016 20232022
Deferred tax assets:   Deferred tax assets:  
Net operating loss carryforwards$20,496
 $17,742
Capital loss carryforward
Tax credit carryforwards486
 399
Interest expense carryforward
Accounts receivable allowance1,134
 1,341
Accrued items and reserves14,371
 18,669
Stock compensation1,480
 4,224
Stock-based compensation
Deferred rent572
 915
Property and equipment depreciation300
 
Deferred revenue
Project costs
Software development/implementation costs
Total deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:Deferred tax liabilities:  
Prepaid expenses
Property and equipment
Goodwill and intangible assets
Equity investment
Deferred financing costs
Other173
 180
39,012
 43,470
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Deferred financing costs38
 154
Prepaids1,440
 2,103
Property and equipment depreciation
 1,238
Goodwill and intangibles amortization5,809
 9,568
Equity investment42,113
 59,244
Other205
 203
49,605
 72,510
Net deferred tax liabilities(10,593) (29,040)
Total deferred tax liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities, net of deferred tax assets
Less valuation allowance(26,402) (27,423)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(36,995) $(56,463)
Net noncurrent deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance of $26,402 and $27,423 for 2017 and 2016, respectively4,632
 1,510
Net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities, net of valuation allowance of $0 and $0 for 2017 and 2016, respectively(41,627) (57,973)
$(36,995) $(56,463)
 
At December 31, 2017,2023, the Company had no$1.5 million of federal or state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards. The Company also had net operatingapproximately $45.8 million of state NOL carryforwards which expire as follows (in thousands):

2024$2,430 
2025194 
2026— 
2027— 
2028— 
2029— 
2030 and thereafter43,223 
Total state net operating loss carryforwards$45,847 

The federal NOL carryforwards and approximately $16.5 million of the state NOL carryforwards relate to pre-acquisition tax periods and are subject to change of ownership limitations on their use. These limitations are not expected to restrict the ultimate use of these loss carryforwards in the following countries which can be carried forward indefinitely:carryforwards.
Australia$41,256
Canada728
France3,882
Saudi Arabia82
UK40,090

Realization of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards is dependent on reversing taxable temporary differences and on generating sufficient taxable income. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more
118


likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets will be realized to the extent they are not covered by a valuation allowance. The amount of the deferred tax assetassets considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.

The net change in the total valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 20172023 was negative $1,021,an increase of $0.4 million, of which positive $2,299$0.5 million related to current operations and negative $3,320offset by $0.1 million related to the adjustmenta subsidiary disposition. The valuation allowance of the beginning balance. The valuation


allowance$3.3 million includes $25,929 primarilyamounts for Australia, Francestate NOLs, capital loss and UK net operating loss carryforwards, and $473 for state tax credit carryforwards for which the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not that these net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards will not be realized in the ordinary course of operations. The Company will continue to assess the valuation allowance, and to the extent it is determined that the valuation allowance should be changed, an appropriate adjustment will be recorded.


U.S. Tax ReformCARES ACT and Proposed Legislation


On December 22, 2017,March 27, 2020, the Tax ReformCARES Act was enacted which institutes fundamental changesinto law. The CARES Act includes several significant business tax provisions that, among other things, allow businesses to carry back NOLs arising in 2018, 2019 and 2020 to the taxationfive prior years, accelerate refunds of multinational corporations. The Tax Reform Act includes changes to the taxation of foreign earnings by implementing a dividend exemption system, expansion of the current anti-deferral rules, a minimum tax on low-taxed foreign earnings and new measures to deter base erosion. The Tax Reform Act also includes a permanent reduction in the corporate tax rate to 21%, repeal of thepreviously generated corporate alternative minimum tax expensingcredits, deferral of capital investment,employer's share of certain payroll taxes, and generally loosen the business interest limitation of the deduction for interest expense. Furthermore, as part of the transition to the new tax system, a one-time transition tax is imposed on a U.S. shareholder’s historical undistributed earnings and profits (“E&P”) of foreign affiliates. Althoughby the Tax Reform Act.

Pursuant to the CARES Act, is generally effective January 1,the Company carried its 2018 GAAP requires recognition of the tax effects of new legislation during the reporting period that includes the enactment date, which was December 22, 2017.

NOL back five years. As a result, of the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate, the Company revalued its ending net deferred tax liabilities as of December 31, 2017 and recognized a provisional tax benefit of $19,397. The Company has projected net accumulated deficits in foreign E&P; therefore, no provisional tax expense for deemed repatriation has been recognized. For any future foreign earnings, the Company will generally be free of additional U.S. tax consequences due to a dividends received deduction implemented as part of the move to a territorial tax system for foreign subsidiary earnings. The Company continues to assert indefinite reinvestment in outside basis differences. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability on outside basis differences is not practicable because of the complexity of laws and regulations, the varying tax treatment of alternative repatriation scenarios, and the variation due to multiple potential assumptions relating to the timing of any future repatriation.

The global intangible low taxed income (“GILTI”) provisions of the Tax Reform Act require the Company to include in its U.S. income tax return foreign subsidiary earnings in excess of an allowable return on the foreign subsidiary’s tangible assets. The Company may be subject to incremental U.S. tax on GILTI income beginning in 2018, and has elected to account for GILTI tax in the period in which it is incurred. Therefore, no deferred tax impacts of GILTI have been considered in the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017.

On December 22, 2017,2020, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”)Company recorded a $27.3 million receivable for the 2018 U.S. NOL carryback, and a $11.0 million tax benefit from the favorable carryback tax rate of 35.0% compared to address the applicationa carryforward tax rate of GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain21.0%. The Company also recorded an additional income tax effectspayable of $3.5 million for 2019 as a result of the Tax Reform Act. In accordance with the SAB 118 guidance,2018 NOL being carried back instead of carried forward.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company has recognizedreceived all of the provisional tax impacts related$27.3 million receivable for the 2018 U.S. NOL carryback. This $27.3 million was also subject to the benefitIRS Joint Committee Review, which was completed in the third quarter of 2021 with no material adjustments being made.

The U.S. House of Representatives has passed bipartisan tax legislation (H.R. 7024, "Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024") that would allow for increased current deductions for domestic research and experimentation expenditures, interest expense and fixed asset depreciation. Such legislation, if enacted, would have a favorable impact on our current income taxes payable.

Unrecognized Tax Benefits

The Internal Revenue Service completed its audit of our consolidated U.S. income tax returns for 2015-2018 and no material adjustments were made to the revaluationlarge refunds (total of deferred$47.6 million from capital loss and NOL carrybacks) received from the loss on the WD Services sale. In addition, we are being examined by various states and by the Saudi Arabian tax assetsauthorities. All known adjustments have been fully reserved.

The Company recognizes interest and liabilities in its consolidated financial statements forpenalties as a component of income tax expense. During the year ended December 31, 2017. The final impact2023 and 2022, the Company did not recognize a tax benefit or expense from interest or penalties. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized a benefit of approximately $0.2 million in interest and penalties. As of both December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had accrued approximately $0.1 million for the payment of penalties and interest.

A reconciliation of the Tax Reform Act may differ from these provisional amounts, possibly materially, due to, among other things, issuance of additional regulatory guidance, changes in interpretations and assumptions the Company has made, and actions the Company may takeliability for unrecognized income tax benefits is as a result of the Tax Reform Act. In accordance with SAB 118, the financial reporting impact of the Tax Reform Act will be completed in the fourth quarter of 2018.follows (in thousands):


Unrecognized Tax Benefits
 December 31,
 202320222021
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year$1,680 $1,290 $2,219 
Increase related to prior year tax positions44 108 (1,027)
Increase related to current year tax positions374 415 148 
Statute of limitations expiration(814)(133)(50)
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year$1,284 $1,680 $1,290 
 
119


The entire ending balance in unrecognized tax benefits of $1.3 million as of December 31, 2023 would reduce tax expense and the Company's effective tax rate. The Company expects no material amount of the unrecognized tax benefits to be recognized during the next twelve months. The Company recognizes interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized approximately $65, $19 and $27, respectively, in interest and penalties. The Company had approximately $83 and $52 for the payment of penalties and interest accrued as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.




A reconciliation of the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits is as follows:
 December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year$1,108
 $271
 $347
Balance upon acquisition/disposition
 764
 
Increase (decrease) related to prior year positions22
 37
 (47)
Increase related to current year tax positions101
 139
 48
Statute of limitations expiration(116) (103) (77)
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year$1,115
 $1,108
 $271
The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various foreign and state jurisdictions. The statute of limitations is generally three years for the U.S., two to five years in foreign countries and between three and four years for the various states in which the Company operates. The Company is subject to the following material taxing jurisdictions: the U.S., UK, Australia, France, Saudi Arabia and Korea. The tax years that remain open for examination by the U.S. and various foreign countries and states principally include the years 20132019 to 2017.2022.


18.17.    Commitments and Contingencies

Legal proceedingsSurveys, Audits and Governmental Investigations
On June 15, 2015, a putative stockholder class action derivative complaint was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Court”), captioned Haverhill Retirement System v. Kerley et al., C.A. No. 11149-VCL (the “Haverhill Litigation”). The complaint named Richard A. Kerley, Kristi L. Meints, Warren S. Rustand, Christopher Shackelton (the “Individual Defendants”) and Coliseum Capital Management, LLC (“Coliseum Capital Management”) as defendants, and the Company as a nominal defendant. The complaint purported to allege that the dividend rate increase term originally in the Company’s outstanding Preferred Stock was an impermissibly coercive measure that impaired the voting rights of the Company’s stockholders in connection with the vote on the removal of certain voting and conversion caps previously applicable to the Preferred Stock (the “Caps”), and that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by approving the dividend rate increase term and attempting to coerce the stockholder vote relating to the Company’s Preferred Stock, and by failing to disclose all material information necessary to allow the Company’s stockholders to cast an informed vote on the Caps. The complaint also purported to allege derivative claims alleging that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by entering into the subordinated note and standby agreement with Coliseum Capital Management, and granting Coliseum Capital Management certain stock options. The complaint further alleged that Coliseum Capital Management aided and abetted the Individual Defendants in breaching their fiduciary duties. The complaint sought, among other things, an injunction prohibiting the stockholder vote relating to the dividend rate increase, corporate governance reforms, unspecified damages and other relief.
On August 31, 2015, after arms’ length negotiations, the parties reached an agreement in principle and executed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) providing for the settlement of claims concerning the dividend rate increase term and stockholder vote and related disclosure. The MOU stated that the Defendants had entered into the partial settlement of the litigation solely to eliminate the distraction, burden, expense, and potential delay of further litigation involving claims that have been settled. Pursuant to the partial settlement, the Company agreed to supplement the disclosures in its definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A (the “2015 Proxy Statement”), Coliseum Capital Management and certain of its affiliates and the Company entered into an amendment to that certain Series A Preferred Stock Exchange Agreement, by and among Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P., Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P., Blackwell Partners, LLC, and The Providence Service Corporation dated as of February 11, 2015 described in the 2015 Proxy Statement, and the Board of the Company agreed to adopt a policy related to the Board’s determination each quarter as to whether the Company should pay cash dividends or allow dividends to be paid in the form of PIK dividends on the Preferred Stock, as further described in the supplemental proxy disclosures. On September 2, 2015, Providence issued supplemental disclosures through a supplement to the 2015 Proxy Statement. On September 16, 2015, Providence stockholders approved the removal of the Caps. The Company provided notice of the proposed partial settlement to Providence’s stockholders by December 11, 2015. At a hearing on February 9, 2016, the court denied approval of the settlement. The Court indicated that plaintiff’s counsel could petition the Court for a mootness fee, and that defendants would have the opportunity to oppose any such application.
On January 12, 2016, the plaintiff filed a verified amended class action and derivative complaint (the “first amended complaint”). In addition to the defendants named in the earlier complaint, the first amended complaint named David Shackelton,


Coliseum Capital Partners, L.P., Coliseum Capital Partners II, L.P., Blackwell Partners, LLC, Coliseum Capital Co-Invest, L.P. (collectively, and together with Coliseum Capital Management, LLC, “Coliseum”) and RBC Capital Markets, LLC (“RBC Capital Markets”) as additional defendants. The first amended complaint purported to allege direct and derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty against some or all of the Individual Defendants and David Shackelton (collectively, the “Amended Individual Defendants”) regarding the approval of the subordinated note, the rights offering, the standby agreement with Coliseum Capital Management, and the grant to Coliseum Capital Management of certain stock options. The first amended complaint also purported to allege an additional derivative claim for unjust enrichment against Coliseum and further alleged that Coliseum and RBC Capital Markets aided and abetted the Amended Individual Defendants in breaching their fiduciary duties. The first amended complaint sought, among other things, revision or rescission of the terms of the subordinated note and Preferred Stock, corporate governance reforms, unspecified damages and other relief.

On May 6, 2016, the plaintiff filed a verified second amended class action and derivative complaint (the “second amended complaint”). In addition to the defendants named in the earlier complaint, the second amended complaint named Paul Hastings LLP (“Paul Hastings”) and Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”) as additional defendants. In addition to previously asserted claims, the second amended complaint purported to assert direct and derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duties against Coliseum Capital Management, in its capacity as the controlling stockholder of the Company, in connection with the subordinated note, the Company’s rights offering of Preferred Stock and the standby purchase agreement with Coliseum Capital Management (the “Financing Transactions”). The second amended complaint also alleged that Paul Hastings breached their fiduciary duties as counsel to the Company in connection with the Financing Transactions and that BofA and Paul Hastings aided and abetted certain of the Amended Individual Defendants in breaching their fiduciary duties in connection with the Financing Transactions. The second amended complaint sought, among other things, revision or rescission of the terms of the subordinated note and Preferred Stock, corporate governance reforms, disgorgement of fees paid to RBC Capital Markets, Paul Hastings and BofA for work relating to the Financing Transactions, unspecified damages and other relief.

On May 20, 2016, the Court granted a six-month stay of the proceeding (which was subsequently extended) to allow a special litigation committee, created by the Board, sufficient time to investigate, review and evaluate the facts, circumstances and claims asserted in or relating to this action and determine the Company’s response thereto. On January 20, 2017, the special litigation committee advised the Court that the parties to the litigation and the special litigation committee had reached an agreement in principle to settle all of the claims in the litigation. The parties then entered into a proposed settlement agreement which was submitted to the Court for approval. On September 28, 2017, the Court approved the proposed settlement agreement among the parties that provided for a settlement amount of $10,000 less plaintiff’s legal fees and expenses (the “Settlement Amount”), with 75% of the Settlement Amount to be paid to the Company and 25% of the Settlement Amount to be paid to holders of the Company’s Common Stock other than certain excluded parties. In November 2017, the Company received a payment of $5,363 from the Settlement Amount, which is included in “Other income” in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2017.


In addition to the matter described above, in the ordinary course of business, the Company is a partymay from time to time be or become subject to surveys, audits and governmental investigations under or with respect to various lawsuits.governmental programs and state and federal laws. Agencies associated with the programs and other third-party commercial payors periodically conduct extensive pre-payment or post-payment medical reviews or other audits of claims data to identify possible payments made or authorized other than in compliance with the requirements of Medicare or Medicaid. In order to conduct these reviews, documentation is requested from the Company and then that documentation is reviewed to determine compliance with applicable rules and regulations, including the eligibility of clients to receive benefits, the appropriateness of the care provided to those clients, and the documentation of that care. Similarly, other state and federal governmental agencies conduct reviews and investigations to confirm the Company's compliance with applicable laws where it operates, including regarding employment and wage related regulations and matters. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any regulatory reviews or other governmental surveys, audits or investigations, but management does not expect any ongoing surveys, audits or investigations involving the Company to have a material adverse effect on the business, liquidity, financial condition, or results of operations of the Company. Regardless of the Company's expectations, however, surveys and audits are subject to inherent uncertainties and can have a material adverse impact on the Company due to, among other reasons, potential regulatory orders that inhibit its ability to operate its business, amounts paid as reimbursement or in settlement of any such matter, diversion of management resources and investigative costs.

Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may from time to time be or become involved in various lawsuits, some of which may seek monetary damages, including claims for punitive damages. Management does not expect theseany ongoing lawsuits involving the Company to have a material impact on the business, liquidity, financial condition, or results of operations of the Company. Legal proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties, however, and unfavorable rulings or other events could occur. Unfavorable resolutions could involve substantial monetary damages. In addition, in matters for which conduct remedies are sought, unfavorable resolutions could include an injunction or other order precluding particular business practices or requiring other remedies. An unfavorable outcome might result in a material adverse impact on our business, liquidity, financial conditionposition, or results of Providence.operations.

Indemnifications related to Haverhill Litigation

The Company indemnifiedrecords accruals for loss contingencies related to legal matters when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the Standby Purchasers from and against any and allamount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. If the Company determines that a range of reasonably possible losses claims, damages, expenses and liabilities relatingcan be estimated, the Company records an accrual for the most probable amount in the range. Due to or arising out of (i) any breachthe inherent difficulty in predicting the outcome of any representation, warranty, covenant or undertaking made by or on behalflegal proceeding, it may not be reasonably possible to estimate a range of potential liability until the matter is closer to resolution. Legal fees related to all legal matters are expensed as incurred.

On September 27, 2022, Daniel Greenleaf, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, asserted claims in an arbitration against the Company. His claims alleged that the Company breached Mr. Greenleaf’s employment agreement and included a tort claim against the Company. Mr. Greenleaf’s arbitration complaint sought contractual, extra-contractual, and statutory damages. In May 2023, Mr. Greenleaf and the Company executed a settlement agreement related to both sides' claims in arbitration and a general release of all claims and the Company agreed to pay Mr. Greenleaf $9.6 million. The Company paid the settlement amount in full in May of 2023.

On August 6, 2020, the Company’s subsidiary, ModivCare Solutions, LLC (“ModivCare Solutions”), was served with a putative class action lawsuit filed against it by Mohamed Farah, the owner of transportation provider Dalmar Transportation, in the Standby Purchase Agreement and (ii)Western District of Missouri, seeking to represent all non-employee transportation providers contracted with ModivCare Solutions. The lawsuit alleged claims under the transactions contemplated by the Standby Purchase AgreementFair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (the “FLSA”), and the 14.0% Unsecured Subordinated Note in aggregate principal amount of $65,500, exceptMissouri Minimum Wage Act, and asserted that all transportation providers to the extent that any such losses, claims, damages, expenses and liabilities are attributable to the gross negligence, willful misconduct or fraud of such Standby Purchaser.
The Company has also indemnified other third parties from and against any and all losses, claims, damages, expenses and liabilities arising out of or in connection with the Company’s acquisition of CCHN Group Holdings, Inc. (operating under the tradename Matrix, and formerly included in our HA Services segment) in October 2014 and related financing commitments, except to the extent that any such losses, claims, damages, expenses and liabilities are found in a final, non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction to have resulted from the gross negligence, bad faith or willful misconduct of such third parties, or a material breach of such third parties’ obligations under the related agreements.
The Company recorded $318, $1,282 and $310 of such indemnified legal expenses related to the Haverhill Litigation during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which is included in “General and administrative expenses”ModivCare Solutions in the consolidated statements of income. Of these amounts, $245, $757putative class should have been considered ModivCare Solutions’ employees rather than independent contractors. On June 6, 2021, the Court conditionally certified as the putative class all current and $310former In Network Transportation Providers who, individually or
120


through their companies, were issued 1099 payments from ModivCare Solutions for providing non-emergency medical transportation services for ModivCare Solutions for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016


and 2015, respectively, were indemnified legal expenses of related parties. Other legal expenses of the Company related to the Haverhill Litigation are covered under the Company’s insurance policies, subject to applicable deductibles and customary review of the expenses by the carrier. The Company recognized expense of $8, $210 and $500 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. While the carrier typically remits payment directly to the respective law firm, the Company accrues for the cost and records a corresponding receivable for the amount to be paid by the carrier. The Company has recognized an insurance receivable of $941 and $1,645 in “Other receivables” in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with a corresponding liability amount recorded to “Accrued expenses”.

Other Indemnifications
The Company has provided certain standard indemnifications in connection with the sale of the Human Services segment to Molina Healthcare Inc. (“Molina”) effective November 1, 2015. All representations and warranties made by the Company in the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) to sell the Human Services segment ended on February 1, 2017. However, claims made prior to February 1, 2017 by the purchaser of the Human Services segment against these representations and warranties may survive until the claims are settled. In addition, certain representations, including tax representations, survive until the expiration of applicable statutes of limitation, and healthcare representations survive until the third anniversary of the closing date. The Company has received indications from the purchaser of the Human Services segment regarding potential indemnification claims. One potential indemnification claim relates to Rodriguez v. Providence Community Corrections (the “Rodriguez Litigation”), a complaint filed in the District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division (the “Rodriquez Court”), against Providence Community Corrections, Inc. (“PCC”), an entity sold under the Purchase Agreement. On September 18, 2017, the plaintiffs in the Rodriguez Litigation filed an unopposed motion for preliminary approval of a proposed settlement, pursuant to which PCC would pay $14,000 to the plaintiffs and $350 to co-defendant Rutherford County, Tennessee. On October 5, 2017, the Rodriguez Court denied preliminary approval of the settlement and requested additional information. On October 18, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a second unopposed motion for approvalprevious three years. Notice of the proposed settlement.collective class was issued on October 5, 2021, and potential members of the class had until January 3, 2022 to opt-in. Plaintiff moved for class certification on August 15, 2022, and ModivCare Solutions filed an opposition to class certification on September 6, 2022. On January 2, 2018,13, 2023, the Rodriguez Court granted preliminary approvalmatter was transferred with the consent of the proposed settlement and authorized notice to class members. 
On September 15, 2017, Molinaparties and the court to binding arbitration. Thereafter, the parties agreed on a settlement arrangement, which the arbitrator approved final on October 30, 2023. The class settlement payment was made in full on December 1, 2023. Notwithstanding the settlement payment, ModivCare Solutions believes that it is and has been in compliance with all material aspects with the laws and regulations regarding the characterization of the transportation providers as independent contractors, and does not believe that the settlement arrangement has had a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

In 2017, one of our PCS segment subsidiaries, All Metro Home Care Services of New York, Inc. d/b/a All Metro Health Care (“All Metro”), received a class action lawsuit in state court claiming that, among other things, it failed to properly pay live-in caregivers who stay in patients’ homes for 24 hours per day (“live-ins”). The Company entered intopays live-ins for 13 hours per day as supported through a memorandumwritten opinion letter from the New York State Department of understanding; andLabor (“NYSDOL”). A similar case involving this issue has been heard by the New York Court of Appeals (New York’s highest court), which on March 1, 2018, Molina26, 2019, issued a ruling reversing earlier lower courts’ decisions that an employer must pay live-ins for 24 hours. The Court of Appeals agreed with the NYSDOL’s interpretation to pay live-ins 13 hours instead of 24 hours if certain conditions were being met. Following All Metro's motion to oppose class certification, which was heard on June 23, 2022, the state court issued an order certifying the class on December 12, 2022. Because the parties to date have been unable to settle their dispute through mediation, discovery in the matter is continuing. If the plaintiffs prove successful in this class action lawsuit, All Metro may be liable for back wages and liquidated damages dating back to November 2021. All Metro believes that it is and has been in compliance in all material respects with the Company entered into a settlement agreement, regarding a settlement of an indemnification claim by Molinalaws and regulations covering pay for live-in caregivers, intends to continue to defend itself vigorously with respect to the Rodriguez Litigationthis matter, and other matters. As of December 31, 2017, the accrual is $15,000 with respect to an estimate of loss for potential indemnification claims. The Company expects to recover a portion of the settlement through insurance coverage, although this cannot be assured.
Litigation is inherently uncertain and the actual losses incurreddoes not believe in theany event that the related legal proceedings were to result in unfavorable outcomes couldultimate outcome of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, andliquidity, financial performance.condition or results of operations.


Purchased Service Commitments
The Company has provided certain standard indemnifications in connection with its Matrix stock subscription transaction whereby Mercury Fortuna Buyer, LLC (“Subscriber”), Providence and Matrix entered into a stock subscription agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”), dated August 28, 2016.  The representations and warranties made bycontract related to transportation services that includes a minimum volume requirement. If the Company does not utilize the minimum level of services specified in the Subscription Agreement ended January 19, 2018; however, certain fundamental representations survive throughagreement, a penalty provision applies. Future minimum payments under the 36th month following the closing date.  The covenants and agreements of the parties to be performed prior to the closing ended January 19, 2018, and all other covenants and agreements survive until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations in the event of a breach, or for such lesser periods specified therein. The Company is not aware of any indemnification liabilities with respect to Matrix that require accrualservice commitments totaled $49.5 million at December 31, 2017.2023 and relates to minimum volume requirements through the end of December 31, 2024.
Other Contingencies
On January 25, 2018, the UK Ministry of Justice (the “MOJ”) released a report on reoffending statistics for certain offenders who entered probation services during the period October 2015 to March 2016. The report provides statistics for all providers of probation services, including our subsidiary RRP, which is in our WD Services segment. This information is the second data set that is utilized to determine performance payments under the various providers’ transforming rehabilitation contracts with the MOJ, as the actual rates of recidivism are compared to benchmark rates established by the MOJ. Performance payments and penalties are linked to two separate measures of recidivism - the binary measure and the frequency measure. The binary measure defines the percentage of offenders within a cohort, formed quarterly, who reoffend in the following 12 months. The frequency measure defines the average number of offenses committed by reoffenders within the same 12-month measurement period. The performance for the frequency measure for most providers has been below the benchmarks established by the MOJ. As a result, RRP could be required to make payments to the MOJ and the amounts of such payments could be material. The amount of potential payments to the MOJ, if any, under RRP’s contracts with the MOJ cannot be estimated at this time, as the MOJ is


reviewing the data to understand the underlying reasons for the increase in certain rates of recidivism and other factors that could impact the contractual measure.
Deferred Compensation Plan

The Company has one deferred compensation plan for management and highly compensated employees of NETNEMT Services as of December 31, 2017.2023. The deferred compensation plan is unfunded, and benefits are paid from the general assets of the Company. The total of participant deferrals, which is reflected in “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets, was $1,806$2.2 million and $1,430$2.0 million at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively.

19.18.    Transactions with Related Parties

Cash Settled Awards

On September 11, 2014, the Company granted 200,000 stock option equivalent units (“SOEUs”) to Coliseum Capital Management, LLC (“Coliseum”) as compensation for the Board service of Christopher Shackelton, Chairman of the Board, for his service on the Board in lieu of the restricted share awards that are given to our other non-employee directors as compensation. These shares were granted at an exercise price of $43.81 per share that were fully vested. The SOEUs were accounted for as liability awards, with the recorded expense adjustment attributable to the Company’s change in stock price from the previous reporting period. On August 12, 2021, Coliseum exercised all of the SOEUs at a stock price of $182.73 per share for a total cash settlement of $27.8 million. The Company incurred legal expenses underrecorded an indemnification agreement with the Standby Purchasers as further discussed in Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies. Preferred Stock dividends earned by the Standby Purchasers during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 totaled $4,213 each year. 

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company made a $566 loan to Mission Providence. The loan was also repaidexpense of $8.8 million for SOEUs during the year ended December 31, 2017.

20. Discontinued Operations
Effective October 19, 2016, the Company completed the Matrix Transaction. At the closing, (i) cash consideration of $180,614 was paid by the Subscriber to Matrix based upon an enterprise value of $537,500 and (ii) Matrix borrowed approximately $198,000 pursuant to a credit and guaranty agreement providing for term loans in an aggregate principal amount of $198,000 and revolving loan commitments in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $10,000,2021, which was not drawn at the closing. At the closing, Matrix distributed $381,163 to Providence, in full satisfaction of a promissory note and accumulated interest between Matrix and Providence. At the closing, Providence made a $5,663 capital contribution to Matrix, as described in the Subscription Agreement, as amended, based upon its pro-rata ownership of Matrix, to fund the near-term cash needs of Matrix. On the day that was fifteen days following the closing date, Providence was, to the extent payable pursuant to the terms of the Subscription Agreement, as amended, entitled to receive from Matrix, or required to pay to Matrix, subsequent working capital adjustment payments. Providence received an initial payment of $5,172 from Matrix in November 2016 which is net of the capital contribution of $5,663 described above, based upon the initial working capital calculation as described in the Subscription Agreement. Additionally, in February 2017, the Company received a $75 payment from Matrix representing the final working capital adjustment payment.
In accordance with ASC 205-20, Presentation of Financial Statements-Discontinued Operations, a component of an entity is reported in discontinued operations after meeting the criteria for held for sale classification if the disposition represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity's operations and financial results. The Company analyzed the quantitative and qualitative factors relevant to the Matrix stock subscription transaction resulting in the Company no longer owning a controlling interest in Matrix, and determined that those held for sale conditions for discontinued operations presentation were met during the third quarter of 2016. As such, the historical financial results of Matrix, the Company’s historical HA Services segment, and the related income tax effects have been presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements through October 19, 2016.
The Company has continuing involvement with Matrix through its ownership of 46.6% of the equity interests in Matrix as of December 31, 2017, as well as through a management consulting agreement, not to exceed ten years. Prior to the Matrix Transaction, the Company owned 100% of the equity interest in Matrix. Subsequent to the Matrix Transaction, the Company accounts for its investment in Matrix under the equity method of accounting. The Company’s share of Matrix’s losses subsequent to the Matrix Transaction, which totaled $13,445 and $1,789, is recorded as “Equity in net (gain) loss of investees” in its consolidated statement of income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Matrix’s pretax loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $2,948 and includes $3,537 of transaction related expenses. Matrix’s pretax loss for the period of October 19, 2016 through December 31, 2016 totaled $7,027 and includes $6,367 of transaction related expenses. There have been no cash inflows or outflows from or to Matrix subsequent to the closing of the Matrix Transaction, other than the working capital adjustments discussed above and management fees associated with its ongoing relationship with Matrix, of which $1,103 was received during the year ended December 31, 2017. $247 and $185 are included in “Other receivables”“General and administrative expense” in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to management fees receivable.
On September 3, 2015, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell allstatements of the membership interests in Providence Human Services, LLC and Providence Community Services, LLC, comprising the


Company’s Human Services segment, in exchange for cash proceeds of approximately $200,000 prior to adjustments for estimated working capital, certain seller transaction costs, debt assumed by the buyer, and a $20,099 cash payment received for the Providence Human Services cash and cash equivalents on hand at closing. The net proceeds were $230,703, although $10,000 is held in an indemnity escrow and recorded within “Prepaid expenses and other” in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017. Proceeds include a customary working capital adjustment of $13,246. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded additional expenses related to the Human Services segment, principally related to legal proceedings as described in Note 18, Commitment and Contingences, related to an indemnified legal matter.

Results of Operations
The following table summarizes the results of operations classified as discontinued operations, net of tax, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. The HA Services segment column in the table below for the year ended December 31, 2016 reflects the financial results for HA Services from January 1, 2016 through October 19, 2016.
 Year ended December 31, 2017
 
Human Services
Segment
 
HA Services
Segment
 
Total Discontinued
Operations
      
Operating expenses:     
General and administrative expense$9,674
 $
 $9,674
Total operating expenses9,674
 
 9,674
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes(9,674) 
 (9,674)
Income tax benefit3,691
 
 3,691
Discontinued operations, net of tax$(5,983) $
 $(5,983)

 Year ended December 31, 2016
 
Human Services
Segment
 
HA Services
Segment
 
Total Discontinued
Operations
      
Service revenue, net$
 $166,090
 $166,090
      
Operating expenses:     
Service expense
 120,906
 120,906
General and administrative expense7,966
 2,148
 10,114
Depreciation and amortization
 21,121
 21,121
Total operating expenses7,966
 144,175
 152,141
Operating income (loss)(7,966) 21,915
 13,949
      
Other expenses:     
Write-off of deferred financing fees
 2,302
 2,302
Interest expense, net
 9,929
 9,929
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before gain on disposition and income taxes(7,966) 9,684
 1,718
Gain on disposition
 167,895
 167,895
(Provision) benefit for income taxes2,401
 (63,254) (60,853)
Discontinued operations, net of tax$(5,565) $114,325
 $108,760


 Year ended December 31, 2015
 
Human Services
Segment
 
HA Services
Segment
 
Total Discontinued
Operations
      
Service revenue, net$291,510
 $217,436
 $508,946
      
Operating expenses:     
Service expense264,293
 163,211
 427,504
General and administrative expense14,975
 2,630
 17,605
Asset impairment charge1,593
 
 1,593
Depreciation and amortization4,831
 29,472
 34,303
Total operating expenses285,692
 195,313
 481,005
Operating income5,818
 22,123
 27,941
      
Other expenses:     
Interest expense, net2,829
 14,359
 17,188
Income from discontinued operations before gain on disposition and income taxes2,989
 7,764
 10,753
Gain on disposition123,129
 
 123,129
Provision for income taxes(24,318) (1,693) (26,011)
Discontinued operations, net of tax$101,800
 $6,071
 $107,871

Interest expense, net
The Company allocated interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing fees, to discontinued operations based on the portion of the debt that was required to be paid with the proceeds from the sale of the Human Services segment and the Matrix Transaction. The total allocated interest expense is included in “Interest expense, net” in the tables above. The total allocated interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
 Year ended December 31,
 2016 2015
Human Services Segment$
 $2,871
HA Services Segment9,939
 14,376
Total$9,939
 $17,247




Cash Flow Information
The following table presents depreciation, amortization, capital expenditures and significant operating noncash items of the discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 For the year ended December 31, 2016
 
Human
Services
Segment
 
HA Services
Segment
 
Total
Discontinued
Operations
      
Cash flows from discontinued operating activities:     
Depreciation$
 $3,661
 $3,661
Amortization
 17,460
 17,460
Stock-based compensation
 (18) (18)
Deferred income taxes
 52,338
 52,338
      
Cash flows from discontinued investing activities:     
Purchase of property and equipment$
 $9,174
 $9,174
 For the year ended December 31, 2015
 
Human
Services
Segment
 
HA Services
Segment
 
Total
Discontinued
Operations
      
Cash flows from discontinued operating activities:     
Depreciation$2,376
 $3,370
 $5,746
Amortization2,455
 26,102
 28,557
Asset impairment charge1,593
 
 1,593
Stock-based compensation7
 108
 115
Deferred income taxes(5,680) 730
 (4,950)
      
Cash flows from discontinued investing activities:     
Purchase of property and equipment$2,224
 $8,079
 $10,303
21.    Segments
The Providence Service Corporation owns subsidiaries and investments primarily engaged in the provision of healthcare services in the United States and workforce development services internationally. The subsidiaries and other investments in which the Company holds interests comprise the following segments:

NET Services – Nationwide manager of non-emergency medical transportation programs for state governments and managed care organizations.
WD Services – Global provider of employment preparation and placement services, legal offender rehabilitation services, youth community service programs and certain health related services to eligible participants of government sponsored programs.
Matrix Investment – Minority interest in Matrix, a nationwide provider of in-home care optimization and management solutions, including CHAs, to members of managed care organizations, accounted for as an equity method investment as a result of the Matrix Transaction on October 19, 2016, which is further discussed in Note 20, Discontinued Operations



In addition to its segments’ operations, the Corporate and Other segment includes the Company’s activities at its corporate office that include executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal, public reporting, certain strategic and corporate development functions, and the Company’s captive insurance company.
Segment results are based on how the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) manages the Company’s business, makes operating decisions and evaluates operating performance. The operating results of the segments include revenue and expenses incurred by the segment, as well as an allocation of direct expenses incurred by Corporate on behalf of the segment. Indirect expenses, including unallocated corporate functions and expenses, such as executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal, public reporting, certain strategic and corporate development functions and the results of the Company's captive insurance company as well as elimination entries recorded in consolidation are reflected in Corporate and Other.

The following table sets forth certain financial information from continuing operations attributable to the Company’s business segments for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 NET Services WD Services 
Matrix
Investment
 
Corporate and
Other
 Total
Service revenue, net$1,318,220
 $305,662
 $
 $
 $1,623,882
Service expense1,227,426
 265,417
 
 (3,799) 1,489,044
General and administrative expense11,779
 25,438
 
 35,119
 72,336
Depreciation and amortization13,275
 12,851
 
 343
 26,469
Operating income (loss)$65,740
 $1,956
 $
 $(31,663) $36,033
          
Equity in net (gain) loss of investees$
 $1,391
 $(13,445) $
 $(12,054)
Investment in equity method investee$
 $213
 $169,699
 $
 $169,912
Total assets$294,127
 $184,805
 $169,699
 $55,459
 $704,090
Long-lived asset expenditures$15,319
 $4,527
 $
 $77
 $19,923
 Year Ended December 31, 2016
 NET Services WD Services Matrix Investment Corporate and Other Total
Service revenue, net$1,233,720
 $344,403
 $
 $122
 $1,578,245
Service expense1,132,857
 320,147
 
 (894) 1,452,110
General and administrative expense11,406
 30,300
 
 28,205
 69,911
Asset impairment charge
 19,588
 
 1,415
 21,003
Depreciation and amortization12,375
 13,824
 
 405
 26,604
Operating income (loss)$77,082
 $(39,456) $
 $(29,009) $8,617
          
Equity in net (gain) loss of investees$
 $8,498
 $1,789
 $
 $10,287
Investment in equity method investee$
 $4,161
 $157,202
 $
 $161,363
Total assets$313,371
 $160,152
 $157,202
 $54,554
 $685,279
Long-lived asset expenditures$10,845
 $19,810
 $
 $1,387
 $32,042



 Year Ended December 31, 2015
 NET Services WD Services Corporate and Other Total
Service revenue, net$1,083,015
 $395,059
 $(64) $1,478,010
Service expense991,659
 393,803
 (4,308) 1,381,154
General and administrative expense10,704
 29,846
 30,436
 70,986
Depreciation and amortization9,429
 13,776
 793
 23,998
Operating income (loss)$71,223
 $(42,366) $(26,985) $1,872
        
Equity in net (gain) loss of investees$
 $10,970
 $
 $10,970
Long-lived asset expenditures$12,232
 $11,869
 $668
 $24,769
Geographic Information
The following table details the Company’s revenue from continuing operations and long-lived assets by geographic location.
 For the year ended December 31, 2017
 
United
States
 
United
Kingdom
 
Other
Foreign
 
Consolidated
Total
Service revenue, net$1,335,389
 $187,655
 $100,838
 $1,623,882
Long-lived assets (a)37,700
 9,354
 3,323
 50,377
 For the year ended December 31, 2016
 
United
States
 
United
Kingdom
 
Other
Foreign
 
Consolidated
Total
Service revenue, net$1,250,043
 $235,061
 $93,141
 $1,578,245
Long-lived assets (a)32,007
 9,823
 4,390
 46,220
 For the year ended December 31, 2015
 
United
States
 
United
Kingdom
 
Other
Foreign
 
Consolidated
Total
Service revenue, net$1,099,918
 $298,386
 $79,706
 $1,478,010
(a)Represents property and equipment, net.

Domestic service revenue, net, totaled 82.2%, 79.2% and 74.4% of service revenue, net for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Foreign service revenue, net, totaled 17.8%, 20.8% and 25.6% of service revenue, net for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
operations. At December 31, 2017, $99,071 of2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, there were no SOEU's outstanding and no remaining liability associated with the Company’s net assets from continuing operations were located in countries outside of the U.S. At December 31, 2016, $76,579 of the Company’s net assets from continuing operations were located in countries outside of the U.S.awards.
Customer Information
11.2%, 10.2% and 11.0% of the Company’s consolidated revenue was derived from one U.S. state Medicaid program for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 10.7% of the Company’s consolidated revenue was derived from one UK governmental agency for the year ended December 31, 2015. In addition, substantially all of the Company’s revenues are generated from domestic and foreign governmental agencies or entities that contract with governmental agencies.



22.    Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
The quarterly consolidated financial statements presented below reflect HA Services and Human Services as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

121
 Quarter ended
 March 31,
2017 (1)
 June 30,
2017
 September 30,
2017 (2)
 December 31,
2017 (3)(4)(5)
        
Service revenue, net$399,494
 $407,983
 $409,517
 $406,888
Operating Income6,788
 5,999
 6,309
 16,937
Income from continuing operations, net of tax1,915
 3,858
 14,964
 39,066
Discontinued operations, net of tax(5,866) (117) (16) 16
Net income (loss) attributable to Providence(4,325) 3,915
 14,853
 38,926
Earnings (loss) per common share (10):       
Basic$(0.40) $0.18
 $0.88
 $2.43
Diluted$(0.40) $0.18
 $0.88
 $2.41


 Quarter ended
 March 31,
2016
 June 30,
2016
 September 30,
2016 (6)
 December 31,
2016 (7)(8)(9)
        
Service revenue, net$382,036
 $398,119
 $412,271
 $385,819
Operating Income (loss)8,304
 6,712
 9,793
 (16,192)
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax1,376
 1,624
 3,743
 (25,657)
Discontinued operations, net of tax753
 2,370
 (2,791) 108,428
Net income attributable to Providence2,235
 4,623
 650
 84,420
Earnings (loss) per common share (10):       
Basic$0.07
 $0.21
 $(0.05) $4.92
Diluted$0.07
 $0.21
 $(0.05) $4.92

(1)The Company recorded expenses, net of tax, of $5,866 in Discontinued operations, net of tax, in the quarter ending March 31, 2017 related to the Company’s former Human Services segment, which are principally related to an ongoing legal matter. 

(2)The Company recorded a gain on sale of equity investment of $12,606, net of tax, related to the sale of its equity interest in Mission Providence during the quarter ended September 30, 2017. During the quarter ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a reduction to the gain on sale of $229, related to the finalization of the working capital adjustment per the sale agreement.

(3)Operating income for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 increased as compared to the prior quarters in 2017 as a result of a decrease in service expense as a percentage of revenue for NET Services and WD Services. This was primarily a result of lower operating costs of both segments as well as certain NET Services contractual adjustments recorded in the fourth quarter of 2017.

(4)The quarter ended December 31, 2017 includes the receipt of the Haverhill Litigation settlement of $5,363.

(5)The quarter ended December 31, 2017 includes a net tax benefit of $16,017 related to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act during the fourth quarter of 2017, due to the re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities by Providence as a result of the reduction in the U.S. corporate tax rate. Providence realized a tax benefit of $19,397, partially offset by $3,379 of increased tax expense resulting from additional equity in net gain of Matrix, due to Matrix' re-


measurement of its deferred tax liabilities. The equity in net gain from Matrix for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 includes a tax benefit of $13,610 related to Matrix's re-measurement of deferred tax liabilities as a result of the Tax Reform Act.

(6)The Company recorded expenses, net of tax, of $5,035 in Discontinued operations, net of tax, in the quarter ended September 30, 2016 related to the Company’s former Human Services segment, which are principally related to an ongoing legal matter. 

(7)Service revenue, net for the quarter ending December 31, 2016 decreased from the quarter ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to decreased revenue associated with the WD Services’ National Citizen Service summer youth programs, which are seasonal in nature. Additionally, the quarter ended September 30, 2016 included revenue of $5,367 under the WD Services’ offender rehabilitation program related to the finalization of a contractual adjustment for the contract years ended March 31, 2015 and 2016.

(8)The Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $1,415 related to the building and land utilized by the holding company, which was sold effective December 30, 2016. Also, the Company recorded asset impairment charges in its WD Services segment of $9,983, $4,381 and $5,224 to its property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill, respectively. 

(9)The quarter ended December 31, 2016 includes gain on loss of controlling interest in Matrix, net of tax, of $109,403.

(10)Earnings per share is computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of quarterly earnings per share may not equal the total computed for the year.

23.    Subsequent Events

On February 16, 2018, Matrix acquired HealthFair, a leading provider of mobile health assessment and advanced diagnostic testing services for a purchase price of $160,000 plus an earnout payment contingent upon HealthFair's 2018 financial performance.  Additionally, Matrix entered into a financing transaction consisting of a $330,000 first lien term loan and a $20,000 revolving line of credit, of which none was drawn, and issued an aggregate of approximately 24,200,000 shares of its common units related to a seller roll-over contribution. As a result of the rollover of certain equity interests in HealthFair, Providence’s equity ownership is 43.6% as of February 16, 2018.

On November 2, 2017, the Company’s Board approved the extension of the Company’s existing stock repurchase program, authorizing the Company to engage in a repurchase program to repurchase up to $69,640 (the amount remaining from the $100,000 repurchase amount authorized in 2016) in aggregate value of our Common Stock through December 31, 2018. During the period January 1, 2018 to March 5, 2018, the Company repurchased 527,825 shares for $33,330, and $25,807 was available under the plan to repurchase shares.




Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
 
None.
 
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.
Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures.
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company,Company's management, under the supervision and with the participation of its management (including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer),officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as(as defined in RuleRules 13a-15(e) ofand 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (December 31, 2017)2023). Based upon this evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officers haveofficer concluded that, suchas a result of the material weaknesses identified in internal control over financial reporting described below, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2023.

In light of the material weaknesses described below, management performed additional analysis and other procedures to provide reasonable assuranceensure that (i) information required to be disclosed byour consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Accordingly, management believes that the Companyconsolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as of and for the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specifiedpresented, in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.accordance with GAAP.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management’s report onThe Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company, and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of the Company’s financial statements would be prevented or detected in all circumstances in a timely manner.

The Company's management, under the supervision and with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, and under the oversight of its Board of Directors, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023 based on the criteria set forth in the Internal Control–Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on such evaluation, management determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2023 as a result of the material weaknesses discussed in the paragraphs that follow below.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The Company's management concluded that the Company did not, with respect to its PCS segment, complete before year-end (i) an effective risk assessment to assess and confirm the effectiveness and implementation of the changes previously identified in its internal control environment related to recently deployed information technology ("IT") systems and revision of the PCS revenue and payroll processes, or (ii) the establishment of all mechanisms expected to be used to enforce accountability in the pursuit of objectives to establish and operate effective internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, at the PCS segment:

The Company did not establish effective general information technology controls ("GITCs"), namely change management controls and logical access controls, that support the consistent operation of all of the Company’s IT systems, resulting in automated process-level controls and manual controls dependent upon
122


information derived from those IT systems to be ineffective because they could have been adversely impacted; and
The Company did not design, implement and effectively operate process-level control activities related to its revenue processes (including service revenue and accounts receivable) and payroll processes (including payroll expenses recorded within service expense and general and administrative expense) within the PCS segment.

The deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting and the material weaknesses described above did not result in any misstatement in our consolidated financial statements or other disclosures. These deficiencies created, however, a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in our consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, who audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report, has issued an adverse opinion on the operating effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. KPMG LLP’s report is presented in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report and is hereby incorporated by reference.Report.


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmManagement’s Remediation Plan

The attestation reportThese material weaknesses were largely a result of the registered public accounting firm oncontinued integration efforts associated with the Company’sacquisition of the companies comprising our PCS segment and the high volume of transactions across their disparate systems. The Company's management, with the oversight of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, is in the process of effecting ongoing remediation efforts related to the material weaknesses identified at the PCS segment.

In furtherance of the foregoing, the Company has embarked upon an approved remediation plan, the efforts of which include working with our independent third-party internal control specialist, which is helping coordinate the remediation efforts, as well as adding resources within the organization to improve structure and mitigate risks previously identified. The remediation plan designed was a robust, global plan intended to address not only the PCS segment identified weaknesses, but also the weaknesses identified in prior periods with respect to our NEMT and Corporate and Other segments. Approaching the remediation in auniform and enterprise wide manner has required additional time to implement, but it was believed to be the better approach than to adopt a patchwork fix without a view to eliminating future enterprise risk To that end, the Company has completed and/or is in the process of completing, as applicable, the following remediation activities deemed necessary or desirable to eliminate the material weaknesses and restore its internal control over financial reporting as intended:

Implemented a new revenue cycle management system and designed a new suite of GITCs and process-level controls related to the new system;
Integrated the PCS segment into our enterprise resource planning software and standardized control activities related to the Company’s financial statement close process;
Executed an enhanced risk assessment process to identify and assess changes in the Company's internal control environment, specifically related to new IT systems and newly acquired companies;
Continued to design, enhance and implement GITCs, the efforts with respect to which are ongoing, to support process-level automated controls intended to ensure that information needed for the operation of manual process-level controls and financial reporting is presentedaccurate and complete;
Continued to design, enhance and implement, the efforts with respect to which are ongoing, process-level control activities in Part II, Item 8,revenue and payroll.

The Company's management continues to focus on projects that automate, standardize, and centralize the Company's control environment as it continues to integrate the PCS segment. Management believes that the remediation measures described above will address the material weaknesses and strengthen the Company's overall internal control over financial reporting. Management will continue to monitor the progress of thisthese efforts, and may take additional measures or modify the remediation plan described above in order to effectively address the control deficiencies. The material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until the remediated controls have operated for a sufficient amount of time for us to conclude, through testing, that the controls are designed and operating effectively.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, management completed the remediation efforts necessary to fully and effectively remediate and eliminate the material weaknesses previously disclosed by the Company in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 with respect to its NEMT and is hereby incorporatedCorporate and Other Segments related to the payroll processing function and change management and logical access controls. The remediation efforts necessary to eliminate those material weaknesses included (i) implementing a new personnel management system in 2023 after the sunsetting of the legacy system and designing and implementing a new suite of internal controls in payroll with appropriate
123


authorities within the NEMT and Corporate and Other segments, and (ii) designing, enhancing, and implementing GITCs to support process-level automated controls within the NEMT and Corporate and Other segments. As a result of the foregoing, as of December 31, 2023, management was able to conclude that the material weaknesses previously disclosed at the NEMT and Corporate and Other segments were fully and effectively remediated.

Furthermore, as previously disclosed in Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, in addition to the material weaknesses identified at the NEMT and Corporate and Other segments above, management identified material weaknesses in the PCS segment's internal control over financial reporting related to the effectiveness of the new structure adopted for its reporting lines and approved for the identification of appropriate authorities and responsibilities. The remediation efforts necessary to eliminate that material weakness included structuring more effective reporting lines, including the hiring of a President of the PCS segment, a Chief Financial Officer to eliminate the dual role previously also performed by reference.our Chief Executive Officer, a Chief Information Officer, and a Chief People Officer, to promote appropriate authorities and responsibilities and strengthen mechanisms to enforce accountability of internal control over financial reporting. As a result of the foregoing, as of December 31, 2023, management was able to conclude that this material weakness previously disclosed at the PCS segment was fully and effectively remediated.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The principal executiveExcept for the changes described in the preceding paragraphs, and financial officers also conducted an evaluationthe ongoing implementation of whether anythe remediation plan with respect to the material weaknesses identified at the PCS segment, discussed above, there were no other changes in the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20172023 that have materially affected, or which are reasonably likely to materially affect, such control. Such officers have concluded that no such changes have occurred.our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.Other Information.
Item 9B.    Other Information.
 
Effective March 12, 2018, Matthew Umscheid, our current Senior Vice President, Strategic Services, is being transferred to employment in such role at our LogistiCare business, pursuant to an offer letter dated March 6, 2018. In connection with this transfer, Mr. Umscheid is resigning as an officer of the Company. Under the terms of his offer letter with LogistiCare, Mr. Umscheid’s annual base salary will remain at $350,000, his target annual bonus for 2018 will remain at 75% of his base salary, and there is no term of employment. In his new role, Mr. Umscheid will also be eligible to participate in other compensation and benefit programs made available to LogistiCare’s senior executives, including a long-term incentive plan.None.




PART III
 
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Item 10.     Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
 
ThisThe information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A to be filed with the SEC and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2018 annual meeting2024 Annual Meeting of stockholders;Stockholders (the "2024 Proxy Statement"); provided that if such proxy statementour 2024 Proxy Statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2018,29, 2024, such information will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on or before such date.
 
Code of Ethics
 
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our senior management, including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, controller and persons performing similar functions, as well as our directors, officers and employees. This code of ethics is part of our broader Compliance and Ethics Plan and Code of Conduct, which is available free of charge in the Investor Relations“Investors” section of our website at www.prscholdings.com.www.modivcare.com. We intend to disclose any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer on our website. The information contained on our website is not part of, and is not incorporated in, this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other report we file with or furnish to the SEC.
  
Item 11.
Executive Compensation.
Item 11.    Executive Compensation.
 
ThisThe information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A to be filed with the SEC and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders;2024 Proxy Statement; provided that if such proxy statementour 2024 Proxy Statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2018,29, 2024, such information will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on or before such date.
  
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Item 12.    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
 
ThisOther than as provided below, the information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A to be filed with the SEC and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders;2024 Proxy Statement; provided that if such proxy statementour 2024 Proxy Statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2018,29, 2024, such information will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on or before such date.

The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2023, regarding our 2006 Plan and the ESPP.
124



Plan category
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(1)
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column)(2)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders586,696$52.63 1,776,308
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
Total586,696 $52.63 1,776,308 

(1) The number of shares shown in this column represents the number of shares available for issuance pursuant to stock options and other stock-based awards that were previously granted and were outstanding as of December 31, 2023 under the 2006 Plan.
(2) The number of shares shown in this column represents 792,338 shares available for issuance under the 2006 Plan and 983,970 shares available for issuance under the ESPP.
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Item 13.    Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
 
ThisThe information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A to be filed with the SEC and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders;2024 Proxy Statement; provided that if such proxy statementour 2024 Proxy Statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2018,29, 2024, such information will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on or before such date.
  
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Item 14.    Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
 
ThisThe information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A to be filed with the SEC and delivered to stockholders in connection with our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders;2024 Proxy Statement; provided that if such proxy statementour 2024 Proxy Statement is not filed on or before April 30, 2018,29, 2024, such information will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on or before such date.
 



PART IV
 
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
Item 15.    Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
 
(a)(1) Financial Statements
 
The following consolidated financial statements including footnotes are included in Item 8.
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20172023 and 2016; 2022; 
Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015;2021;
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive IncomeCash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015;2021; and
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, 2022 and 2015; and
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.2021.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
 
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
125


  
Additions    

Balance at
beginning of
period

Charged to
costs and
expenses

Charged to
other
accounts

Deductions
Balance at
end of
period
Year Ended December 31, 2017: 
 
     
Allowance for doubtful accounts$5,901

$815

$(466)(1)$488
(2)$5,762















Year Ended December 31, 2016: 
 
     
Allowance for doubtful accounts$4,380

$3,298

$1,058
(1)$2,835
(2)$5,901















Year Ended December 31, 2015: 
 
     
Allowance for doubtful accounts$3,198

$1,928

$1,152
(1)$1,898
(2)$4,380
  Additions    
Balance at
beginning of
period
Charged to
costs and
expenses
Charged to
other
accounts
DeductionsBalance at
end of
period
Year Ended December 31, 2023:       
Allowance for doubtful accounts$2,078 $4,001 $— $(5,110)(1)$969 
Year Ended December 31, 2022:      
Allowance for doubtful accounts$2,296 $2,690 $— $(2,908)(1)$2,078 
Year Ended December 31, 2021:      
Allowance for doubtful accounts$2,403 $1,740 $— $(1,847)(1)$2,296 

Notes:
 
Schedule above has been recast from prior year to exclude activity related to discontinued operations.(1)Write-offs, net of recoveries.
(1)Amounts primarily include the allowance for contractual adjustments related to our non-emergency transportation services operating segment that are recorded as adjustments to non-emergency transportation services revenue. Amount additionally includes impact from change in foreign currency rates.
(2)Write-offs, net of recoveries.


All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in our financial statements or the related notes thereto.


126




 (3) Exhibits

Exhibit NumberDescription
2.1
Exhibit
Number
Description
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.42.2
2.52.3
2.63.1
3.1

3.2
3.3
3.3
3.4
3.5
4.13.6
4.1*
10.1
4.2
4.3
10.210.1†
10.310.2


127


10.510.3+
10.610.4+
10.7
10.8+
10.9+
10.10+

10.11+
10.12+


10.13+
10.14+

10.15+

10.16+

10.17+

10.18+10.5*
10.6*
10.7+
10.8+
10.9+
10.10+
10.19+10.11+
10.12+
10.13+
10.14+


10.15+
10.20+
10.16+
10.17
10.18
10.19+
10.21+10.20+
128



21.1*
10.22+
10.23+
10.24+
10.25
10.26*
10.27+


10.28+*
10.29+*
12.1*
21.1*
23.1*
23.2*
23.3*
31.1*
31.1*
31.2*
32.1**
32.2**
99.1*97.1*
101. INS*Inline XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*Inline XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL*Inline XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB*Inline XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*Inline XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*Inline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
104+Cover page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
+Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
*Filed herewith other than by incorporation by reference.
**Furnished herewith.
Certain schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. The descriptions of the omitted schedules and exhibits are contained within the agreement. The Company hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to the SEC upon request.



129


Item 16.        Form 10-K Summary.


None.

130



SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ModivCare Inc.
THE PROVIDENCE SERVICE CORPORATIONBy:/s/ L. Heath Sampson
By:/s/ R. Carter Pate
R. Carter Pate
Interim L. Heath Sampson
Chief Executive Officer
 
Dated: March 9, 2018February 23, 2024
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
131


SignatureTitleDate
/s/ L. HEATH SAMPSON
SignatureTitleDate
/S/ R. CARTER PATE
Interim Chief Executive Officer
and Director
March 9, 2018February 23, 2024
R. Carter PateL. Heath Sampson(Principal Executive Officer)
/S/ DAVID C. SHACKELTONs/ BARBARA GUTIERREZChief Financial OfficerMarch 9, 2018February 23, 2024
David C. ShackeltonBarbara Gutierrez(Principal Financial Officer)
/S/ WILLIAM SEVERANCEs/ REBECCA ORCUTTChief Accounting OfficerMarch 9, 2018February 23, 2024
William SeveranceRebecca Orcutt(Principal Accounting Officer)
/S/s/ CHRISTOPHER S. SHACKELTONChairman of the BoardMarch 9, 2018February 23, 2024
Christopher S. Shackelton
/S/s/ TODD J. CARTERDirectorMarch 9, 2018February 23, 2024
Todd J. Carter
/S/s/ DAVID A. COULTERDirectorMarch 9, 2018February 23, 2024
David A. Coulter
/S/s/ RICHARD A. KERLEYDirectorMarch 9, 2018February 23, 2024
Richard A. Kerley
/S/ KRISTI L. MEINTSDirectorMarch 9, 2018
Kristi L. Meints
/S/s/ LESLIE V. NORWALKDirectorMarch 9, 2018February 23, 2024
Leslie V. Norwalk
/S/s/ FRANK J. WRIGHTDirectorMarch 9, 2018February 23, 2024
Frank J. Wright
/s/ RAHUL SAMANTDirectorFebruary 23, 2024
Rahul Samant
/s/ GARTH GRAHAMDirectorFebruary 23, 2024
Garth Graham



129
132