UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
————————
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
|
| | |
| UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
| Washington, D.C. 20549 |
| Form 10-K | |
|
| |
| (Mark One) |
| þ | Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2017. |
| ¨ | Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from to . |
Commission File Number: 001-31950
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
| Delaware | | 16-1690064 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer |
| incorporation or organization) | | Identification No.) |
| |
2828 N. Harwood St., 15th Floor Dallas, Texas | | 75201 (Zip Code) |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
(214) 999-7552
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
| Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Common stock, $0.01 par value | | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
————————
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company”company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer ¨ |
| | | |
| Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Non-accelerated filer | ¨ |
| Accelerated filer | þ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Emerging growth company | ¨ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financing accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No þ
The aggregate market value of voting and nonvoting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the last sales price as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC as of June 30, 2015,2017, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $351.0$499.5 million.
54,080,32355,460,583 shares of common stock were outstanding as of March 1, 2016.8, 2018.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain information required by Part III of this report is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s proxy statement for the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | |
| | | Page |
| PART I. |
| Item 1. | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Item 1A. | | |
| Item 1B. | | |
| Item 2. | | |
| Item 3. | | |
| Item 4. | | |
| | |
| PART II. |
| Item 5. | | |
| Item 6. | | |
| Item 7. | | |
| Item 7A. | | |
| Item 8. | | |
| Item 9. | | |
| Item 9A. | | |
| Item 9B. | | |
| | |
| PART III. |
| Item 10. | | |
| Item 11. | | |
| Item 12. | | |
| Item 13. | | |
| Item 14. | | |
| | |
| PART IV. |
| Item 15. | | |
| Item 16. | | |
| |
| |
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
Overview
MoneyGram International, Inc. (together with our subsidiaries, and consolidated entities, “MoneyGram,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our”) is a global provider of innovative money transfer services and is recognized worldwide as a financial connection to friends and family. Whether online, through a mobile device, at a kiosk or in a local store, we connect consumers in any way that is convenient for them. We also provide bill payment services, issue money orders and process official checks in select markets. Our primary customers are persons who may not be fully served by other financial institutions, which we refer to as unbanked or underbanked consumers. Unbanked consumers do not have a relationship with a traditional financial institution. Underbanked consumers are not fully served by traditional financial institutions. The World Bank, a key source of industry analysis for cross-border remittance data, estimates that 2 billion adults are unbanked, based on 20142017 global data. As an alternative financial services provider, we provide these consumers with essential services to help them meet the financial demands of their daily lives. Many of our customers utilize traditional banking services but prefer to use our services based on convenience, quality of our service, trust of our brand, cost or to make urgent payments or transfers.
Our offerings include money transfers, bill payment services, money order services and official check processing. Our money transfer services are our primary revenue driver. Money transfersOur services are movements of funds between consumers from the origination or "send" locationoffered in approximately 350,000 locations in more than 200 countries and the designated "receive" location. MoneyGram earns revenue from the fees paid by the consumers sending the fundsterritories and from the management of currency exchange spreads on money transfer transactions involving different “send” and “receive” currencies. We share a significant portion of that fee with both the sending and receiving agents. We also earn bill payment services revenues primarily from transaction fees charged to consumers for each transaction completed. Additionally, we earn revenue from the sale of our money order and official check products and generate revenue from the investment of funds underlying these products.
Our money transfer services enable our consumers to send and receive funds around the world through our extensive global network of locations, which are primarily operated by third-party businesses ("agents"), but also include Company-operated retail locations. Operating in more than 200 countries and territories, we have nearly doubled our network since 2009 to over 350,000 locations. We also offer Digital/Self-ServiceDigital solutions such as moneygram.com, mobile solutions, account deposit and kiosk-based services. We have one primary customer care center in Warsaw, Poland, with regional support centers providing ancillary services and additional call center services in various countries. We provide call center services 24 hours per day, 365 days per year and provide customer service in 27dozens of languages.
The MoneyGram® brand is recognized throughout the world. We use various trademarks and service marks in our business, including, but not limited, to MoneyGram, the Globe design logo, MoneyGram Bringing You Closer, MoneyGram MyWay, MoneyGram MobilePass, MoneyGram Kameleon, ExpressPayment, MoneyGram xpressSend It. Pay It. Load It., Moneygrado, FormFree, AgentWorks, Agent Connect,Agent-Connect, Delta, PrimeLinkDeltaWorks, PowerTransact and MGiAlloy,PrimeLink, some of which are registered in the U.S.United States and other countries. This document also contains trademarks and service marks of other businesses that are the property of their respective holders and are used herein solely for identification purposes. We have omitted the ® and TM designations, as applicable, for the trademarks we reference.
We conduct our business primarily through our wholly-owned subsidiary, MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc. ("MPSI"), under the MoneyGram brand. The Company was incorporated in Delaware on December 18, 2003 in connection with the June 30, 2004 spin-off from our former parent company, Viad Corporation. Through the Company's predecessors, we have been in operation for over 70 years.
The Company utilizes specific terms related to our business throughout this document, including the following:
Corridor — With regard to a money transfer transaction, the originating "send" location and the designated "receive" location are referred to as a corridor.
Corridor mix — The relative impact of increases or decreases in money transfer transaction volume in each corridor versus the comparative prior period.
Face value — The principal amount of each completed transaction, excluding any fees related to the transaction.
Foreign currency — The impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on our financial results is typically calculated as the difference between current period activity translated using the current period’s currency exchange rates and the comparable prior-year period’s currency exchange rates. We use this method to calculate the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on revenues, commissions and other operating expenses for all countries where the functional currency is not the U.S. dollar.
History and DevelopmentMerger Agreement
We conduct our business primarily through our wholly-owned subsidiary, MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc. ("MPSI") under the MoneyGram brand. The Company was incorporated in DelawareAs previously disclosed, on December 18, 2003 in connection with the June 30, 2004 spin-off from our former parent company, Viad Corporation. Through the Company's predecessors, we have been in operation for over 70 years.
In March 2008, we completed a recapitalization pursuant to which we received an infusion of $1.5 billion of gross equity and debt capital, referred to herein as the 2008 Recapitalization. The equity component consisted of the sale to affiliates of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. ("THL") and affiliates of Goldman, Sachs & Co. ("Goldman Sachs") (collectively with THL, the "Investors") in a private placement of Series B Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (the "B Stock") and Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (the "B-1 Stock") and collectively with the B Stock (the "Series B Stock") for an aggregate purchase price of $760.0 million. We also paid Goldman Sachs an investment banking advisory fee equal to $7.5 million in the form of additional shares of the B-1 Stock.
In May 2011, we completed a second recapitalization, referred to herein as the 2011 Recapitalization. Pursuant to the 2011 Recapitalization, (i) THL, as the holder of all of the B Stock, converted all of the shares of B Stock into shares of our common stock in accordance with the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series B Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of MoneyGram International, Inc., (ii) Goldman Sachs, as the holder of all of the B-1 Stock, converted all of the shares of B-1 Stock into shares of Series D Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (the "D Stock") in accordance with the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of MoneyGram International, Inc., and (iii) THL received approximately 3.5 million additional shares of our common stock and $140.8 million in cash, and Goldman Sachs received 15,503 additional shares of D Stock and $77.5 million in cash.
On November 14, 2011, we filed a certificate of amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at a reverse stock split ratio of 1-for-8 and to decrease the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.3 billion to 162.5 million shares. As the par value of common stock was not affected, $3.5 million was transferred from common stock to additional paid-in capital. In connection with the reverse stock split, the conversion ratio of the D Stock to common stock decreased from 1,000 to 1 to 125 to 1.
2014 Incremental Agreement and Secondary Public Offering — On April 2, 2014, the Company, as borrower, entered into a First Incremental Amendment and Joinder Agreement (the "Incremental Agreement") with Bank of America, N.A. ("BOA"), as administrative agent, and various lenders. The Incremental Agreement provided for (a) a tranche under the term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $130.0 million (the "Tranche B-1 Term Loan Facility") to be made available to the Company under the 2013 Credit Agreement, (b) an increase in the senior secured five-year revolving credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility") under the 2013 Credit Agreement from $125.0 million to $150.0 million and (c) certain other amendments to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, whichJanuary 26, 2017, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended by the First Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 15, 2017, the “Merger Agreement”) with BOAAlipay (UK) Limited, a United Kingdom limited company (“Alipay”), Matrix Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and various other lenders in March 2013wholly owned subsidiary of Alipay (“Merger Sub”), and, solely for purposes of certain specified provisions of the Merger Agreement, Alipay (Hong Kong) Holding Limited, a Hong Kong limited company, providing for the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company, with the Company surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Alipay (the "2013 Credit Agreement"“Merger”) including, without limitation, (i) amendments.
The closing of the Merger was subject to certain conditions, including clearance by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) under the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended. The parties to the Merger Agreement were advised that CFIUS clearance of the conditions precedentMerger would not be forthcoming. After further discussion between the parties, they determined to cease efforts to seek CFIUS approval and entered into a Termination Agreement, dated January 2, 2018 (the “Termination Agreement”), pursuant to which they mutually terminated the Merger Agreement, with respectAlipay paying the Company a termination fee of $30.0 million. The parties also agreed to these incremental borrowings, (ii) an increaserelease each other from certain claims and liabilities arising out of or relating to the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby.
In addition, pursuant to the Termination Agreement, the Company and Alipay agreed to work collaboratively to explore and develop non-exclusive strategic initiatives to bring together their capabilities in the maximum secured leverage ratioremittance and digital payments markets to provide their respective customers with which the Company is required to comply as of the last day of each fiscal quarter,user-friendly, rapid-response and (iii) amendments to permit the Company to borrow up to $300.0 million under the facility for share repurchases exclusively from THL and Goldman Sachs. The Company borrowed $130.0 million under the Tranche B-1 Term Loan Facility on April 2, 2014, and the proceeds were used to fund a portion of the share repurchases from THL, discussed below, reducing the remaining limit for such purchases to $170.0 million.
On April 2, 2014, the Company completed an underwritten secondary public offering by affiliates and co-investors of the Investors of an aggregate of 9,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. As part of the transaction, affiliates of Goldman Sachs converted an aggregate of 37,957 shares of D Stock to 4,744,696 shares of common stock, which were sold as part of the transaction. The selling stockholders received all of the proceeds from the offering. Also, on April 2, 2014, the Company completed the repurchase of 8,185,092 shares of common stock from the THL selling stockholders at a price of $16.25 per share.
2015 Events
In the first quarter of 2014, the Company announced the implementation of the 2014 Global Transformation Program, which consists of three key components: reorganization and restructuring, compliance enhancement and a focus on Digital/Self-Service revenue.
Our reorganization and restructuring activities were centered around facilities and headcount rationalization, system efficiencies and headcount right-shoring and outsourcing. The Company expects to complete these activities in early 2016 and recorded total reorganization and restructuring expenses of $20.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Our compliance enhancement program was focused on improving our services for consumers and completing the programs recommended in adherence with our settlement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania ("MDPA") and the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice ("U.S. DOJ"). The Company incurred $26.5 million of compliance enhancement program expense for the year ended December 31, 2015.
We believe that our investment in innovative products and services, particularly Digital/Self-Service solutions such as moneygram.com, mobile solutions, account deposit and kiosk-based services, positions the Company to enhance revenue growth and diversify our product offerings. For the year ended December 31, 2015, thelow-cost money transfer feeservices into China, India, the Philippines and other revenue from the Digital/Self-Service channel grew 55 percent from 2014 and accounted for $150.1 million, or 12 percent, of total money transfer fee and other revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015.markets.
Our Segments
We manage our business primarily through two reporting segments: Global Funds Transfer and Financial Paper Products. The following table presents the components of our consolidated revenue associated with our reporting segments for the years ended December 31:
| | | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Global Funds Transfer | | | | | | | | | | |
| Money transfer | 88.0 | % | | 87.6 | % | | 87.3 | % | 89 | % | | 89 | % | | 89 | % |
| Bill payment | 6.9 | % | | 6.9 | % | | 6.9 | % | 5 | % | | 6 | % | | 7 | % |
| Financial Paper Products | | | | | | | | | | |
| Money order | 3.6 | % | | 3.7 | % | | 3.7 | % | 3 | % | | 3 | % | | 3 | % |
| Official check | 1.5 | % | | 1.8 | % | | 2.0 | % | 3 | % | | 2 | % | | 1 | % |
| Other | — | % | | — | % | | 0.1 | % | |
| Total revenue | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
See Part II, Item 7, “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 1514 — Segment Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional financial information about our segments and geographic areas.
During 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, our 10 largest agents accounted for 37 percent, 39 percent34%, 36% and 43 percent,37%, respectively, of total revenue and 38 percent, 41 percent35%, 37% and 44 percent,39%, respectively, of Global Funds Transfer segment revenue. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Walmart”) is our only agent that accounts for more than 10 percent10% of our total revenue. In 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, Walmart accounted for 19 percent, 22 percent17%, 18% and 27 percent,19%, respectively, of total revenue. Walmart accounted for 18% of Global Funds Transfer revenue in 2017 and 20 percent, 23 percent and 28 percent, respectively,19% of Global Funds Transfer segment revenue.revenue in each of 2016 and 2015.
Global Funds Transfer Segment
The Global Funds Transfer segment is our primary revenue driver, providing money transfer services and bill payment services primarily to unbanked and underbanked consumers. We utilize a variety of proprietary point-of-sale platforms, including AgentConnect, which is integrated into an agent’s point-of-sale system, DeltaWorks and Delta T3, which are separate software and stand-alone device platforms, and moneygram.com.
We continue to focus on the growth of our Global Funds Transfer segment outside of the U.S. During 2015, 20142017 and 2013,2016 sends originated outside of the U.S. generated 43 percent, 41 percent47% each year and 40 percent, respectively,46% in 2015, of our total Company revenue, and 45 percent, 43 percent50%, 49% and 42 percent,48% for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, of our total Global Funds Transfer segment revenue. In 2015,2017, our Global Funds Transfer segment had total revenue of $1,361.4 million.$1.5 billion.
Money Transfer — We earn our money transfer revenues primarily from consumer transaction fees and the management of currency exchange spreads on money transfer transactions involving different “send” and “receive” currencies. We have corridor pricing capabilities that provide us flexibility when establishing consumer fees and foreign exchange rates for our money transfer services, which allow us to remain competitive in all locations. In a cash-to-cash money transfer transaction, both the agent initiating the transaction and the receiving agent earn a commission that is generally a fixed fee or is based on a percentage of the fee charged to the consumer. When a money transfer transaction is initiated at a MoneyGram-owned store, full-servicestaging kiosk or via our online platform, typically only the receiving agent earns a commission.
In certain countries, we have multi-currency technology that allows consumers to choose a currency when initiating or receiving a money transfer. The currency choice typically consists of local currency, U.S. dollars and/or euros. These capabilities allow consumers to know the amount that will be received in the selected currency.
The majority of our remittances constitute transactions in which cash is collected by one of our agents and funds are available for pick-up at another agent location. Typically, the designated recipient may receive the transferred funds within 10 minutes at any MoneyGram agent location. In select countries, the designated recipient may also receive the transferred funds via a deposit to the recipient’s bank account, mobile phone account or prepaid card. Through our online product offerings, consumers can remit funds from a bank account, credit card or debit card.
We offer a variety of services to provide the best consumer experience possible at our agent locations. We offer full-service and transaction-staging kiosks at select agent locations around the world. Our MoneyGram MobilePass product allows customers to stage a transaction on a mobile device or online and pay for the transaction at one of MoneyGram's thousands of locations across the U.S. Through our FormFree service, consumers are directed via phone to one of our customer care centers where a representative collects transaction information and enters it directly into our central data processing system. Our MoneyGram xpress product enables consumers to pay for money transfers at a MoneyGram agent location, and provide the information necessary to complete the money transfer when and where it is convenient for them, via phone or any internet-enabled device.
We offerIn 2017, we offered our money transfer services on the internet via our moneygram.com service in the U.S., United Kingdom and Germany and through affiliate websites. Through moneygram.com, consumers have the ability to send money from the convenience of their home or internet-enabled mobile device to any of our agent locations worldwide or to a recipient's bank account through a debit or credit card or, in certain cases, funding with a U.S. checking account. Money transfer transactions through moneygram.com grew 17 percent24% and revenue grew 8 percent25% in 20152017 over the prior year.
We also offer our money transfer services via virtual agents allowing our consumers to send international transfers conveniently from a website or their mobile phone in over 1027 countries. We continue to expand our money transfer services to consumers through the addition of full-service and transaction-staging kiosks, ATMs, prepaid cards and direct-to-bank account products in various markets around the world.
As of December 31, 2015,2017, our money transfer agent network had overapproximately 350,000 locations, with growth of 3 percent compared to 2014.locations. Our agent network includes agents such as international post offices, formal and alternative financial institutions as well as large and small retailers. Additionally, we have Company-operated retail locations in the U.S. and Western Europe. Some of our agents outside the U.S. manage sub-agents. We refer to these agents as super-agents. Although these sub-agents are under contract with these super-agents, the sub-agent locations typically have access to similar technology and services as our other agent locations. Many of our agents have multiple locations, a large number of which operate in locations that are open outside of traditional banking hours, including nights and weekends. Our agents know the markets they serve and they work with our sales and marketing teams to develop business plans for their markets. This may include contributing financial resources to, or otherwise supporting, our efforts to market MoneyGram's services.
Bill Payment Services — We earn our bill payment revenues primarily from fees charged to consumers for each transaction completed. Our primary bill payment service offering is our ExpressPayment service, which we offer at substantially all of our money transfer agent and Company-operated locations in the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico, at certain agent locations in select Caribbean and European countries and through our Digital/Self-ServiceDigital solutions.
Through our bill payment services, consumers can complete urgent bill payments, pay routine bills, or load and reload prepaid debit cards with cash at an agent location, company-operated locations or through moneygram.com with a credit or debit card. We offer consumers same-day and two or three day payment service options; the service option is dependent upon our agreement with the biller. We offer over 13,000 payment options to over 13,500 billers in key industries, including the ability to allow the consumer to load or reload funds to nearly 400500 prepaid debit card programs. These industries include the credit card, mortgage, auto finance, telecommunications, corrections, health care, utilities, property management, prepaid card and collections industries.
Marketing — We have global marketing and product management teams located in multiple geographical regions. We employ a strategy of developing products and marketing campaigns that are global, yet can be tailored to address our consumer base and local needs. A key component of our marketing efforts is our global branding. We use a marketing mix to support our brand, which includes traditional, digital and social media, point-of-sale materials, signage at our agent locations, targeted marketing campaigns, seasonal campaigns and sponsorships.
Sales — Our sales teams are organized by geographic area, product and delivery channel. We have dedicated teams that focus on developing our agent and biller networks to enhance the reach of our money transfer and bill payment products. Our agent requirements vary depending upon the type of outlet, location and compliance and regulatory requirements. Our sales teams and strategic partnership teams continue to improve our agent relationships and overall network strength with a goal of providing the optimal agent and consumer experience.
Competition — The market for money transfer and bill payment services continues to be very competitive and the World Bank estimates that in 20162018 cross-border remittances will exceedbe over $600 billion. We generally compete for money transfer agents on the basis of value, service, quality, technical and operational differences, price, commission and marketing efforts. We compete for money transfer consumers on the basis of trust, convenience, availability of outlets, price, technology and brand recognition.
Our competitors include a small number of large money transfer and bill payment providers, financial institutions, banks and a large number of small niche money transfer service providers that serve select regions. Our largest competitor in the money transfer industry is The Western Union Company ("Western Union"), which also competes with our bill payment services and money order businesses. On April 17,In 2014, Walmart announced the launch of the Walmartlaunched a white label money transfer service, a program operated by a competitor of MoneyGram that allows consumers to transfer money between itsWalmart U.S. store locations. See our "Management's Discussion and Analysis — Overview" sectionin Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor additional disclosure. We will encounter increasing competition as new technologies emerge that allow consumers to send and receive money through a variety of channels, but we continue to be an innovator in the industry by diversifying our core money transfer business through new channels, such as online, mobile solutions, kiosk and other Digital/Self-Servicedigital offerings.
Seasonality — A larger share of our annual money transfer revenues traditionally occurs in the third and fourth quarters as a result of major global holidays falling during or around this period.
Financial Paper Products Segment
Our Financial Paper Products segment provides money orders to consumers through our retail agents and financial institutions located throughout the U.S. and Puerto Rico and provides official check outsourcing services for financial institutions across the U.S.
In 2015,2017, our Financial Paper Products segment generated revenues of $73.3$94.0 million from fee and other revenue and investment revenue. We earn revenue from the investment of funds underlying outstanding official checks and money orders. We refer to our cash and cash equivalents, settlement cash and cash equivalents, interest-bearing investments and available-for-sale investments collectively as our “investment portfolio.” Our investment portfolio primarily consists of low risk, highly liquid, short-term U.S. government securities and bank deposits that produce a low rate of return.
Money Orders — Consumers use our money orders to make payments in lieu of cash or personal checks. We generate revenue from money orders by charging per item and other fees, as well as from the investment of funds underlying outstanding money orders, which generally remain outstanding for fewer than eightapproximately six days. We sell money orders under the MoneyGram brand and on a private label or co-branded basis with certain large retailagents and financial institution agentsinstitutions in the U.S. As of December 31, 2015,2017, we issued money orders through our network of approximately 47,000over 17,500 agents and financial institution locations in the U.S. and Puerto Rico.
Official Check Outsourcing Services — Official checks are used by consumers where a payee requires a check drawn on a bank. Financial institutions also use official checks to pay their own obligations. Similar to money orders, we generate revenue from our official check outsourcing services forthrough U.S. banks and credit unions by charging per item and other fees, as well as from the investment of funds underlying outstanding official checks, which generally remain outstanding for fewer thanapproximately four days. As of December 31, 2015,2017, we provided official check outsourcing services through approximately 900800 financial institutions at approximately 6,3005,600 branch bank locations.
Marketing — We employ a wide range of marketing methods. A key component of our marketing efforts is our global branding. We use a marketing mix to support our brand, which includes traditional, digital and social media, point of sale materials, signage at our agent locations and targeted marketing campaigns. Official checks are financial institution branded, and therefore, all marketing to this segment is business to business.
Sales — Our sales teams are organized by product and delivery channel. We have dedicated teams that focus on developing our agent and financial institution networks to enhance the reach of our official check and money order products. Our agent and financial institution requirements vary depending upon the type of outlet or location, and our sales teams continue to improve and strengthen our agentthese relationships with a goal of providing the optimal agentconsumer experience with our agents and consumer experience.financial institutions.
Competition — Our money order competitors include a small number of large money order providers and a large number of small regional and niche money order providers. Our largest competitors in the money order industry are Western Union and the U.S. Postal Service. We generally compete for money order agents on the basis of value, service, quality, technical and operational differences, price, commission and marketing efforts. We compete for money order consumers on the basis of trust, convenience, availability of outlets, price, technology and brand recognition.
Official check competitors include financial institution solution providers, such as core data processors, and corporate credit unions. We generally compete against a financial institution’s desire to perform these processes in-house with support from these types of organizations. We compete for official check customers on the basis of value, service, quality, technical and operational differences, price and commission.
Regulation
Compliance with laws and regulations is a highly complex and integral part of our day-to-day operations. Our operations are subject to a wide range of laws and regulations of the U.S. and other countries, including anti-money laundering laws and regulations; financial services regulations; currency control regulations; anti-bribery laws; regulations of the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC"); money transfer and payment instrument licensing laws; escheatment laws; privacy, data protection and information security laws; and consumer disclosure and consumer protection laws. Regulators worldwide are exercising heightened supervision of money transfer providers and requiring increased efforts to ensure compliance. Failure to comply with any applicable laws and regulations could result in restrictions on our ability to provide our products and services,
as well as the potential imposition of civil fines and possibly criminal penalties. See “Risk Factors” section in Item 1A for additional discussion regarding potential impacts of failure to comply. We continually monitor and enhance our global compliance programs in light of the most recent legal and regulatory changes. We also launched the compliance enhancement program in 2014 to enhance our systems and processes.
Deferred Prosecution Agreement — In November 2012, we announced that a settlement was reached with the MDPAU.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (the "MDPA") and the U.S. DOJDepartment of Justice ("U.S. DOJ") relating to the previously disclosed investigation of transactions involving certain of our U.S. and Canadian agents, as well as fraud complaint data and the consumer anti-fraud program, during the period from 2003 to early 2009. In connection with this settlement, we entered into a five-year deferred prosecution agreement ("DPA"(the "DPA") with the MDPA and U.S. DOJ dated November 8, 2012. Under the DPA, we agreed to a forfeiture of $100.0 million that is available as restitution to victims of the consumer fraud scams perpetrated through MoneyGram agents. Also under the DPA, we have agreed, among other things, to retain an independent compliance monitor for a period of five years subject to adjustment to a shorter period under certain circumstances, and in the first quarter of 2013, Aaron Marcu, a litigation partner with Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, LLP in New York and head of its global financial institutions litigation group, was selected as our independent compliance monitor. We have received threefive annual reports from the compliance monitor, and we continue to make investments in various areas related to our compliance systems and operations in order to comply with the requirements contained in the DPA and recommendations of the compliance monitor. If
On November 1, 2017, the Company agreed to a stipulation with the MDPA and the DOJ (the “Government”) that the term of the Company’s DPA be extended for 90 days to February 6, 2018. On January 31, 2018, the Company agreed with the Government that the term of the DPA be extended for an additional 45 days to March 23, 2018. The purpose of the extension is to provide the Company and the Government additional time to discuss whether the Company is in compliance with the DPA. There can be no assurance that the Company and the Government will continue to be able to negotiate a mutually satisfactory outcome during such 45 day period (or any further short-term extension of the DPA) or that such outcome will not include a further extension of the DPA, financial penalties or additional restrictions on the Company, including a monitorship period beyond the current monitorship that ends on April 30, 2018. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the Government will not seek any other remedy, including criminal prosecution and financial penalties, in lieu of an extension of the DPA and monitorship.
The Company has recorded an $85.0 million accrual in connection with a possible resolution of this matter, based on the facts and circumstances known at the time. However, the Company is unable to meet such requirementsreasonably estimate the ultimate loss and no assurance can be given that future costs and payments made in connection with this matter will not exceed the allotted time period,amount currently recorded or that the term of the DPA and the independent compliance monitor could be extended, which could result in additional costs.government will not also seek to impose non-monetary remedies or penalties. See “Risk Factors — We face possible uncertainties relating to compliance with and the impact of the deferred prosecution agreement entered into with the U.S. federal government” for additional information.
Anti-Money Laundering Compliance — Our money transfer services are subject to U.S. anti-money laundering laws and regulations, of the U.S., including the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, as well as state laws and regulations and the anti-money laundering laws and regulations in many of the countries in which we operate, particularly in the European Union. Countries in which we operate may require one or more of the following:
reporting of large cash transactions and suspicious activity;
screening of transactions against government watch-lists, including but not limited to, the watch-list maintained by OFAC;
prohibition of transactions in, to or from certain countries, governments, individuals and entities;
limitations on amounts that may be transferred by a consumer or from a jurisdiction at any one time or over specified periods of time, which require aggregation over multiple transactions;
consumer information gathering and reporting requirements;
consumer disclosure requirements, including language requirements and foreign currency restrictions;
notification requirements as to the identity of contracting agents, governmental approval of contracting agents or requirements and limitations on contract terms with our agents;
registration or licensing of the Company or our agents with a state or federal agency in the U.S. or with the central bank or other proper authority in a foreign country; and
minimum capital or capital adequacy requirements.
Anti-money laundering regulations are constantly evolving and vary from country to country. We continuously monitor our compliance with anti-money laundering regulations and implement policies and procedures in light of the most current legal requirements.
We offer our money transfer services primarily through third-party agents with whom we contract and do not directly control. As a money services business, we and our agents are required to establish anti-money laundering compliance programs that include: (i) internal policies and controls; (ii) designation of a compliance officer; (iii) ongoing employee training and (iv) an independent review function. We have developed an anti-money laundering training manual available in multiple languages and a program to assist with the education of our agents on the various rules and regulations. We also offer in-person and online training as part of our agent compliance training program and engage in various agent oversight activities. We have also adopted a global compliance policy that outlines key principles of our compliance program to our agents.
In connection with regulatory requirements to assist in the prevention of money laundering, terrorist financing and other illegal activities and pursuant to legal obligations and authorizations, the Company makes information available to certain U.S. federal and state, as well as certain foreign, government agencies when required by law. In recent years, the Company has experienced increasingan increase in data sharing requests by these agencies, particularly in connection with efforts to prevent money laundering or terrorist financing or reduce the risk of identity theft.consumer fraud. In certain cases, the Company is also required by government agencies to deny transactions that may be related to persons suspected of money laundering, terrorist financing or other illegal activities, and as a result the Company may inadvertently deny transactions from customers who are making legal money transfers, which could lead to liability or reputational damage. Responding to these agency requests may result in increased operational costs.
Money Transfer and Payment Instrument Licensing — In most countries, either we or our agents are required to obtain licenses or to register with a government authority in order to offer money transfer services. Almost all states in the U.S., the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam require us to be licensed to conduct business within their jurisdictions. Our primary overseas operating subsidiary, MoneyGram International Ltd., is a licensed payment institution under the Payment Services Regulations adopted in the United Kingdom pursuant to the European Union Payment Services Directive.Directive ("PSD"). As a result of the United Kingdom’s planned exit from the European Union, we have obtained authorization as a payment institution from the National Bank of Belgium for the conduct of our business in the European Union following the United Kingdom’s departure. In 2016, the PSD was amended by a revised Payment Services Directive (“PSD2”), which was implemented in the national law of the member states during or prior to January 2018. Among other changes, the PSD2 has increased the supervisory powers granted to member states with respect to activities performed by us and our agents in the European Union. We are also subject to increasingly significant licensing or other regulatory requirements in various other jurisdictions. Licensing requirements may include minimum net worth, provision of surety bonds or letters of credit, compliance with operational procedures, agent oversight and the maintenance of reserves or “permissible investments” in an amount equivalent to outstanding payment obligations, as defined by our various regulators. The types of securities that are considered “permissible investments” vary across jurisdictions, but generally include cash and cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other highly rated debt instruments. Many regulators require us to file reports on a quarterly or more frequent basis to verify our compliance with their requirements. Many regulators also subject us to periodic examinations and require us and our agents to comply with anti-money laundering and other laws and regulations.
Escheatment Regulations — Unclaimed property laws of every state in the U.S., the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands require that we track certain information on all of our payment instruments and money transfers and, if they are unclaimed at the end of an applicable statutory abandonment period, that we remit the proceeds of the unclaimed property to the appropriate jurisdiction. Statutory abandonment periods for payment instruments and money transfers range from three to seven years. Certain foreign jurisdictions also have unclaimed property laws. These laws are evolving and are frequently unclear and inconsistent among various jurisdictions, making compliance challenging. We have an ongoing program designed to comply with escheatment laws as they apply to our business.
Data Privacy Regulations and Data Sharing RequestsCybersecurity Laws and Regulations — InWe are subject to federal, state and international laws and regulations relating to the ordinary coursecollection, use, retention, security, transfer, storage and disposal of business we collect certain typespersonally identifiable information of data that subject us to privacy laws in the U.S.our consumers, agents and abroad.employees. In the U.S., we are subject to various federal privacy laws, including the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which requires that financial institutions provide consumers with privacy notices and have in place policies and procedures regarding the safeguarding of personal information. We are also subject to privacy and data breach laws of various states. Outside the U.S., we are subject to privacy laws of numerous countries and jurisdictions. In some cases, these laws are more restrictive than the Gramm-Leach-Bliley ActU.S. laws and impose more stringent duties on companies. These laws generally restrictcompanies or penalties for non-compliance. For example, the collection, transfer, processing, storage, use and disclosure of personal information. InGeneral Data Protection Regulation in the European Union, we are subject to recently enactedeffective May 2018, will impose a higher standard of personal data protection laws that have been ratified bywith significant penalties for non-compliance for companies operating in the European ParliamentUnion or doing business with European Union residents. In addition, government surveillance laws and data localization laws are expectedevolving to address increased and changing threats and risks. All of these laws are continuing to develop and may be ratified by member states by 2017. These laws impose additional data protection and privacy requirements and increase potential penalties for non-compliance. In certain cases, we transfer personal datainconsistent from our European operationsjurisdiction to the U.S. In the past we have relied on the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor framework with respect to this transfer of data, and we are assessing our ongoing obligations following the invalidation of the safe-harbor framework in a decision by the European Court of Justice in October 2015 and the new "Privacy Shield" agreement intended to replace the Safe Harbor. We also have confidentiality and information security standards and procedures in place for our business activities and with our third-party vendors and service providers. Privacy and information security laws, both domestically and internationally, evolve regularly, and conflicting laws in the various jurisdictions where we do business pose challenges.jurisdiction.
Dodd-Frank Act — The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") was signed into law in 2010. The Dodd-Frank Act imposes additional regulatory requirements and creates additional regulatory oversight forover us. The Dodd-Frank Act created a Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (the "CFPB") which issues and enforces consumer protection initiatives governing financial products and services, including money transfer services, in the U.S. The CFPB’s Remittance Transfer Rule became effective on October 28, 2013. Its requirements include: a disclosure requirement to provide consumers sending funds internationally from the U.S. enhanced pre-transaction written disclosures, an obligation to resolve certain errors, including errors that may be outside our control, and an obligation to cancel transactions that have not been completed at a customer's request. As a “larger participant” in the market for international money transfers, we are subject to direct examination and supervision by the CFPB. We have modified our systems and consumer disclosures in light of the requirements of the Remittance Transfer Rule. In addition, under the Dodd-Frank Act, it is unlawful for any provider of consumer financial products or services to engage in unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices. The CFPB has substantial rule making and enforcement authority to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a financial product or service.
Foreign Exchange Regulation — Our money transfer services are subject to foreign currency exchange statutes of the U.S., as well as similar state laws and the laws of certain other countries in which we operate. Certain of these statutes require registration or licensure and reporting. Others may impose currency exchange restrictions with which we must comply.
Regulation of Prepaid Cards — We sell our MoneyGram-branded prepaid card in the U.S., in addition to loading prepaid cards of other card issuers through our ExpressPayment offering. Our prepaid cards and related loading services may be subject to federal and state laws and regulations, including laws related to consumer protection, licensing, unclaimed property, anti-money laundering and the payment of wages. Certain of these federal and state statutes prohibit or limit fees and expiration dates on and/or require specific consumer disclosures related to certain categories of prepaid cards. We continually monitor our prepaid cards and related loading services in light of developments in such statutes and regulations.
Anti-Bribery Regulation — We are subject to regulations imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the "FCPA") in the U.S., the U.K. Bribery Act and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions. We are subject to recordkeeping and other requirements imposed upon companies related to compliance with these laws. We maintain a compliance program designed to comply with applicable anti-bribery laws and regulations.
Clearing and Cash Management Bank Relationships
Our business involves the transfer of money on a global basis on behalf of our consumers, our agents and ourselves. We buy and sell a number of global currencies and maintain a network of settlement accounts to facilitate the funding of money transfers and foreign exchange trades to ensure that funds are received on a timely basis. Our relationships with the clearing, trading and cash management banks are critical to an efficient and reliable global funding network.
In the U.S., we have agreements with six active clearing banks that provide clearing and processing functions for official checks, money orders and other draft instruments. We employ four banks to clear our official checks and three banks to clear our retail money orders. We believe that this network of banks provides sufficient capacity to handle the current and projected volumes of items for these services.
We maintain significant relationships with major international banks which provide the capability to transfer money electronically as well as through domestic and international wire transfer networks. There are a limited number of banks that have the capabilities that are broad enough in scope to handle our volume and complexity. Consequently, we employ banks whose market is not limited to their own country or region, and have extensive systems capabilities and branch networks that can support settlement needs that are often unique to different countries around the world. In 2013, we activated our participation in the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication ("SWIFT") network for international wire transfers, which improves access to all banks in the world while lowering the cost of these funds transfers.
Intellectual Property
The MoneyGram brand is important to our business. We have registered our MoneyGram trademark in the U.S. and in a majority of the other countries in which we do business. We maintain a portfolio of other trademarks that are material to our Company, which were previously discussed in the "Overview" section. In addition, we maintain a portfolio of MoneyGram branded and related domain names.
We rely on a combination of patent, trademark and copyright laws and trade secret protection and confidentiality or license agreements to protect our proprietary rights in products, services, expertise and information. We believe the intellectual property rights in processing equipment, computer systems, software and business processes held by us and our subsidiaries provide us with a competitive advantage. We take appropriate measures to protect our intellectual property to the extent such intellectual property can be protected.
We own various patents related to our money order and money transfer technologies. Our patentstechnologies which have in the past given us competitive advantages in the marketplace. We also have patent applications pending in the U.S. that relate to our money transfer, money order and bill payment technologies and business methods. We anticipate that these applications, if granted, could give us continued competitive advantages in the marketplace.
Employees
As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had 1,2151,180 full-time employees in the U.S. and 1,6051,756 full-time employees outside of the U.S. In addition, we engage independent contractors to support various aspects of our business. None of our employees in the U.S. are represented by a labor union.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
W. Alexander Holmes, age 41,43, has served as Chief Executive Officer since January 1, 2016.2016 and Chairman of the Board since February 2018. Prior to that, Mr. Holmes served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since February 2014 and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since March 2012. He joined the Company in 2009 as Senior Vice President for Corporate Strategy and Investor Relations. From 2003 to 2009, Mr. Holmes served in a variety of positions at First Data Corporation, including chief of staff to the Chief Executive Officer, Director of Investor Relations and Senior Vice President of Global Sourcing & Strategic Initiatives. From 2002 to 2003, he managed Western Union’s Benelux region from its offices in Amsterdam. Mr. Holmes is also a member of our Board of Directors.
Pamela H. Patsley, age 59, has been Executive Chairman of the Company since January 1, 2016. Prior to that, Ms. Patsley served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since September 2009. From January to September 2009, she served as Executive Chairman of the Company. Prior to that, Ms. Patsley served as Senior Executive Vice President of First Data Corporation, a global payment processing company, from March 2000 to October 2007, and President of First Data International from May 2002 to October 2007. From 1991 to 2000, Ms. Patsley served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Paymentech, Inc., prior to its acquisition by First Data Corporation. Ms. Patsley also served as Chief Financial Officer of First USA, Inc. She currently serves as a director of Texas Instruments, Inc., a semiconductor design and manufacturing company; and Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., a beverage company.
Lawrence Angelilli, age 60,62, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, since January 1, 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Angelilli served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Finance and Treasurer since 2014. He joined the Company in August 2011 as Senior Vice President and Treasurer. From 2009 to 2010, Mr. Angelilli served as Director of Underwriting at Hudson Advisors, a global asset management company affiliated with Lone Star Funds, a global private equity fund. From 1998 to 2009, he was Senior Vice President of Finance at Centex Corporation, a publicly traded homebuilder and mortgage originator.
Juan Agualimpia,Joann L. Chatfield, age 53,52, has served as Executive Vice President, Business Development and Chief Marketing Officer since February 2015. Mr. Agualimpia previously served as ExecutiveMay 2017. Ms. Chatfield joined MoneyGram in May 2011 and has held various roles within the Company, including Director of Marketing, U.S. and Canada, Vice President, Global Marketing Services and ChiefHead of Marketing Officer from February 2011 to February 2015.for North and South America. Prior to that, Mr. Agualimpia served as Senior Vice Presidentjoining MoneyGram, Ms. Chatfield held various management roles at Texans Credit Union and Chief Marketing Officer from March 2010 to February 2011. From March 2009 to March 2010, Mr. Agualimpia engaged in marketing project consulting. From 2005 to March 2009, Mr. Agualimpia served as Vice President and General Manager for the Art & Coloring Global Business Unit of Newell Rubbermaid. Mr. AgualimpiaMCI, Inc. Ms. Chatfield has over 20 years of leadership experience in marketing, brand management, customer relationship managementproduct marketing as well as vendor and product development.sponsorship management.
R. Lee Furnival, Kamila K. Chytil, age 44,38, has been Senior Vice President,served as Chief Global Operations Officer since December 2014. From August 2014 to December 2014, Mr. Furnival servedMay 2016. Ms. Chytil joined the Company in May 2015 as the Senior Vice President of Operational Effectiveness. Priorkey partnerships and payments. From 2011 to joiningMay 2015, Ms. Chytil was Senior Vice President and General Manager of retail payments at Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., a global provider of financial technology solutions, where she was responsible for e-commerce, check cashing and retail payments. From 2004 to 2011, Ms. Chytil held various other management roles at Fidelity National Information Services, overseeing analytics, risk management, and operations.
Laura Gardiner, age 50, has been Chief Human Resources and Communications Officer since February 2017. She joined the Company in AugustApril of 2012 as a Senior Director of Human Resources and from 2014 Mr. Furnival spent 12 years at Beal Bank where he led multiple subsidiaries and affiliatesto January 2017 served as Vice President of the bank.Human Resources. From 2010 to 2014 he started and led all European debt investment initiatives and operations.2012, Ms. Gardiner served as Director of Human Resources with Western Union, a global financial services company. From 20072008 to 2010, Mr. Furnival was2009, Ms. Gardiner served as Vice President of BSB Capital, the bank’s portfolioHuman Resources with Pronerve LLC, a neurophysiologic monitoring service company. Ms. Gardiner has over 20 years of experience in human resources and securities investment subsidiary, and served as Presidentbusiness roles in a variety of the bank’s residential mortgage servicing operation. From 2002 to 2007, Mr. Furnival ran multiple operational, investment and trading units within the bank. Prior to joining Beal Bank in 2002, Mr. Furnival held various management positions in technology consulting, mortgage finance, and commercial real estate development companies.industries.
Francis Aaron Henry, age 50,52, has served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since August 2012 and previously served as interim General Counsel from July 2012 to August 2012. He joined the Company in January 2011 as Senior Vice President, Assistant General Counsel, Global Regulatory and Privacy Officer. From 2008 to 2011, Mr. Henry was Assistant General Counsel at Western Union and from 2004 to 2008, he was Senior Counsel at Western Union.
W. Alexander Hoffmann, age 44, has served as Executive Vice President, Global Product since February 2015. Previously Mr. Hoffmann served as Executive Vice President, Global Product Management and Emerging Channels from February 2014 to February 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Hoffmann served as Senior Vice President, Global Product Management and Emerging Channels from July 2013 to February 2014. From 2007 to 2013, Mr. Hoffmann served in a variety of positions at PayPal, most recently as Senior Director of Europe, Middle East and Africa Consumer Growth. Prior to that, Mr. Hoffmann spent 12 years at McKinsey & Company in Brussels, Belgium, and Palo Alto, California, as an Associate Partner working with clients in the payments and telecommunications industries.
Grant A. Lines, age 51,53, has served as Executive Vice President, Business DevelopmentChief Revenue Officer since January 2018. Prior to that, he served as Chief Revenue Officer, Africa, Middle East, Asia Pacific, Russia and CIS from February 2015.2015 until January 2018. Mr. Lines previously served the Company as Executive Vice President, Asia-Pacific, South Asia and Middle East from February 2014 to February 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Lines served the Company as Senior Vice President, Asia-Pacific, South Asia and Middle East from February 2013 to February 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Lines served as General Manager of Black Label Solutions, a leading developer and supplier of computerized retail Pointpoint of Salesale systems, from May 2011 to December 2012. He served as Managing Director of First Data Corporation’s ANZ business, a global payment processing company, from September 2008 to February 2011. Prior to that, Mr. Lines served as Senior Vice President of First Data’s Strategic Business Development and General Manager ASEAN establishing Asian operationsheld various positions in Singapore from June 2004 to August 2008 and Senior Vice President with sales and marketing responsibilities in Australia and New Zealand from October 2000 to May 2004.the industry.
Wayne F. McGurkAndres Villareal, age 54,53, has served as Executive Vice President, Information Technologybeen Chief Compliance Officer since January 1,March 2016. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President of Information Technology since July 2014 and Vice President, Program Management Office from March 2014 to July 2014. He joined the Company in July 2013 as Program Manager of the Compliance Enhancement Program. From 2004 to July 2013, Mr. McGurk served as a Vice President of First Data Corporation, where he led the global demand management team. Prior to his tenure at First Data Corporation, McGurk had nearly 14 years of management experience with retail, software and IT strategy consulting companies. McGurk began his career as a Lieutenant in the U.S. Army.
Peter E. Ohser, age 48, has been Executive Vice President, Business Development since February 2015. Mr. Ohser previously served as Executive Vice President, U.S. and Canada from February 2014 to February 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Ohser served as Senior Vice President, U.S. and Canada from February 2013 to February 2014. From June 2010 to January 2013, he served as Vice President, Independent Retail Channels & Outbound Corridors, and from December 2007 to May 2010, he served as Director of Strategic Planning. He served as Director of Business Process and Organizational Readiness from 2006 to 2007, Senior Manager Global Risk from 2004 to 2006, Manager, Global Risk from 2003 to 2004 and Supervisor, Risk from 2002 to 2003. Mr. Ohser joined the Company in January 2001 as a Senior Risk Analyst. Prior to that, Mr. Ohser served in various finance roles in the mortgage and consumer finance industries.
Steven Piano, age 50, has served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources since August 2009. From January 2008 to August 2009, Mr. Piano served as Global Lead Human Resource Partner with National Grid, a multi-national utility company. From 1996 to January 2008, Mr. Piano held a variety of human resources positions with First Data Corporation, serving most recently as Senior Vice President of First Data International. From 1987 to 1996, Mr. Piano held human resources positions with Citibank, Dun & Bradstreet - Nielsen Media Research and Lehman Brothers.
Phyllis J. Skene-Stimac, age 56, has been Executive Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer since December 2014. Ms. Skene-Stimac previously servedApril 2015 as Senior Vice President and Deputy Chief Compliance Officer. From 2004 to April 2015, Mr. Villareal held various positions at Citigroup, a leading global bank, including Global Head of Compliance for Citi Commercial Bank and Chief Compliance Officer from February 2011 to December 2014. From June 2008 to December 2010, Ms. Skene-Stimac served as Deputy Chief Compliance Officerfor Citi Assurance Services, a captive insurance company. Mr. Villareal has over 27 years of experience in various compliance, legal and Vice President Global Programs for Western Unionbusiness roles in a variety of industries, including financial services, banking and previously served as Vice President Compliance Operations for Western Union from April 2004 to July 2005. From January 1999 to February 2003, Ms. Skene-Stimac served as the Director of Regulatory Affairs for First Data Corporation.insurance.
John D. Stoneham, age 37,39, has been Vice President, Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer since October 2015. Mr. Stoneham previously served as Vice President and Interim Controller fromsince August 2015. From December 2012 to July 2015, Mr. Stoneham served in various accounting roles at the Company. Prior to December 2012, Mr. Stoneham was the Corporate Controller for Cinsay, Inc., a software provider. From January 2011 to December 2011, he was the SEC Reporting Manager at Archipelago Learning, a software-as-a-service provider of education products. Mr. Stoneham is a Certified Public Accountant and began his career at KPMG LLP, an accounting and financial advisory services firm.
Available Information
Our website address is corporate.moneygram.com. The information on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make our reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, Section 16 reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5, and all amendments to those reports, available electronically free of charge in the Investor Relations section of our website (ir.moneygram.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Any materials filed with the SEC may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE., Washington DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be found by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Additionally, the SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, which may be found at www.sec.gov.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
Various risks and uncertainties could affect our business. Any of the risks described below or elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or our other filings with the SEC could have a material impact on our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.
RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
We face intense competition, and if we are unable to continue to compete effectively, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The markets in which we compete are highly competitive, and we face a variety of competitors across our businesses, some of which have larger and more established customer bases and substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources than we have. Money transfer, bill payment and money order services compete in a concentrated industry, with a small number of large competitors and a large number of small, niche competitors. Our money transfer products compete with a variety of financial and non-financial companies, including banks, card associations, web-based services, payment processors, informal remittance systems, consumer money transfer companies and others. The services are differentiated by features and functionalities, including brand recognition, customer service, reliability, distribution network and options, price, speed and convenience. Distribution channels such as online, account based and mobile solutions continue to evolve and impact the competitive environment for money transfers. The electronic bill payment services within our Global Funds Transfer segment compete in a highly fragmented consumer-to-business payment industry. Our official check business competes primarily with financial institutions that have developed internal processing capabilities or services similar to ours and do not outsource official check services. Financial institutions could also offer competing official check outsourcing services to our existing and prospective official check customers.
Our future growth depends on our ability to compete effectively in money transfers,transfer, bill payment, and money order and official check services. For example, if our products and services do not offer competitive features and functionalities, we may lose customers to our competitors, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and financial results.results of operations. In addition, if we fail to price our services appropriately relative to our competitors, consumers may not use our services, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and financial results. We have historically implemented and will likely continue to implement price adjustments from time to time in response to competition and other factors.results of operations. For example, transaction volume where we face intense competition could be adversely affected by increasing pricing pressures between our money transfer services and those of some of our competitors, which could reduce margins and adversely affect our financial results.condition and results of operations. We have historically implemented and will likely continue to implement price adjustments from time to time in response to competition and other factors. If we reduce prices in order to more effectively compete, such reductions could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations in the short term and may also adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations in the long term if transaction volumes do not increase sufficiently.
If we lose key agents, our business with key agents is reduced or we are unable to maintain our agent network under terms consistent with those currently in place, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Most of our revenue is earned through our retail agent network. In addition, our international agents may have subagent relationships in which we are not directly involved. If agents or their subagents decide to leave our network, our revenue and profits could be adversely affected. Agent loss may occur for a number of reasons, including competition from other money transfer providers, an agent’s dissatisfaction with its relationship with us or the revenue earned from the relationship, or an agent’s unwillingness or inability to comply with our standards or legal requirements, including those related to compliance with anti-money laundering regulations, anti-fraud measures or agent monitoring. Agents may also generate fewer transactions or reduce locations for reasons unrelated to our relationship with them, including increased competition in their business, general economic conditions, regulatory costs or other reasons. In addition, we may not be able to maintain our agent network under terms consistent with those already in place. Larger agents may demand additional financial concessions or may not agree to enter into exclusive arrangements, which could increase competitive pressure. The inability to maintain our agent contracts on terms consistent with those already in place, including in respect of exclusivity rights, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A substantial portion of our agent network locations, transaction volume and revenue is attributable to or generated by a limited number of key agents. During 20152017 and 2014,2016, our ten largest agents accounted for 37 percent34% and 39 percent,36%, respectively, of our total company fee and investment revenue. Our largest agent, Walmart, accounted for 19 percent17% and 22 percent18% of our total company fee and investment revenue in 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively. The current term of our contract with Walmart expires on February 1, 2019. If our contracts with our key agents, including Walmart, are not renewed or are terminated, or are renewed but on less favorable terms, or if such agents generate fewer transactions or reduce their locations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. During 2015, our transaction volume at Walmart locations was adversely affected byIn addition, the introduction in April 2014 of its competing white label branded product for Walmart-to-Walmart money transfers in the U.S. The introduction of other competitive products by Walmart or our other key agents, including competing white label products, could reduce our business with those key agents and intensify industry competition, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Consumer fraud could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Criminals are using increasingly sophisticated methods to engage in illegal activities such as identity theft, fraud and paper instrument counterfeiting. As we make more of our services available over the internet and other digital media, we subject ourselves to new types of consumer fraud risk because requirements relating to consumer authentication are more complex with internet services. Certain former retail agents have also engaged in fraud against consumers, and existing agents could engage in fraud against consumers. We use a variety of tools to protect against fraud; however, these tools may not always be successful. Allegations of fraud may result in fines, settlements, litigation expenses and reputational damage.
The industry is under increasing scrutiny from federal, state and local regulators in the United States and regulatory agencies in many countries in connection with the potential for consumer fraud. If consumer fraud levels involving our services were to rise, it could lead to regulatory intervention and reputational and financial damage. This, in turn, could lead to government enforcement actions and investigations, reduce the use and acceptance of our services or increase our compliance costs and thereby have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
MoneyGram and our agents are subject to numerous U.S. and international laws and regulations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in material settlements, fines or penalties, and changes in these laws or regulations could result in increased operating costs or reduced demand for our products or services, all of which may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in a highly regulated environment, and our business is subject to a wide range of laws and regulations that vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We are also subject to oversight by various governmental agencies, both in the U.S. and abroad. In light of the current conditions in the global financial markets and economy, lawmakers and regulators in the U.S. in particular have increased their focus on the regulation of the financial services industry. New or modified regulations and increased oversight may have unforeseen or unintended adverse effects on the financial services industry, which could affect our business and operations.
The money transferOur business is subject to a variety of regulations aimed at preventing money laundering and terrorism. We are subject to U.S. federal anti-money laundering laws, including the Bank Secrecy Act and the requirements of OFAC, which prohibit us from transmitting money to specified countries or to or from prohibited individuals. Additionally, we are subject to anti-money laundering laws in many other countries in which we operate, particularly in the European Union. We are also subject to financial services regulations, money transfer and payment instrument licensing regulations, consumer protection laws, currency control regulations, escheatescheatment laws, privacy and data protection laws and anti-bribery laws. Many of these laws are constantly evolving, and may be unclear and inconsistent across various jurisdictions, making compliance challenging. Subsequent legislation, regulation, litigation, court rulings or other events could expose us to increased program costs, liability and reputational damage.
We are considered a Money Services Business in the U.S. under the Bank Secrecy Act, as amended by the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001. As such, we are subject to reporting, recordkeeping and anti-money laundering provisions in the U.S. as well as many other jurisdictions. During 2015,2017, there were significant regulatory reviews and actions taken by U.S. and other regulators and law enforcement agencies against banks, Money Services Businesses and other financial institutions related to money laundering, and
the trend appears to be greater scrutiny by regulators of potential money laundering activity through financial institutions. We are also subject to regulatory oversight and enforcement by Thethe U.S. Department of the Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN"). Any determination that we have violated the anti-money-laundering laws could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Dodd-Frank Act increases the regulation and oversight of the financial services industry. The Dodd-Frank Act addresses, among other things, systemic risk, capital adequacy, deposit insurance assessments, consumer financial protection, interchange fees, derivatives, lending limits, thrift charters and changes among the bank regulatory agencies. The Dodd-Frank Act requires enforcement by various governmental agencies, including the CFPB. Money transmitters such as the Company are subject to direct supervision by the CFPB and are required to provide additional consumer information and disclosures, adopt error resolution standards and adjust refund procedures for international transactions originating in the U.S. in a manner consistent with the Remittance Transfer Rule (a rule issued by the CFPB pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act). In addition, the CFPB may adopt other regulations governing consumer financial services, including regulations defining unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices, and new model disclosures. We could be subject to fines or other penalties if we are found to have violated the Dodd-Frank Act’s prohibition against unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices. The CFPB’s authority to change regulations adopted in the past by other regulators could increase our compliance costs and litigation exposure. Our litigation exposure may also be increased by the CFPB’s authority to limit or ban pre-dispute arbitration clauses. We may also be liable for failure of our agents to comply with the Dodd-Frank Act. The legislation and implementation of regulations associated with the Dodd-Frank Act have increased our costs of compliance and required changes in the way we and our agents conduct business. In addition, we are subject to periodic examination by the CFPB. Our initial examination by the CFPB was completed in 2015. The results of this examination may require us to change the way we conduct business or increase the costs of compliance.
We are also subject to regulations imposed by the FCPA in the U.S., the U.K. Bribery Act and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions. Because of the scope and nature of our global operations, we experience a higher risk associated with the FCPA and similar anti-bribery laws than many other companies. We are subject to recordkeeping and other requirements imposed upon companies related to compliance with these laws. In 2015,2017, there have been significant regulatory reviews and actions taken by the United States and other regulators related to anti-bribery laws, and the trend appears to be greater scrutiny on payments to, and relationships with, foreign entities and individuals.
We are also subject to the European Union’s Payment Services Directive (“PSD”), which governs the regulatory regime for payment services in the European Union, and similar regulatory or licensing requirements in other jurisdictions. The PSD and other international regulatory or licensing requirements may impose potential liability on us for the conduct of our agents and the commission of third-party fraud utilizing our services. If we fail to comply with the PSD or such other requirements, we could be subject to fines or penalties or revocation of our licenses, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, the U.S. and other countries periodically consider initiatives designed to lower costs of international remittances which, if implemented, may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, we are subject to escheatment laws in the United States and certain foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct business. These laws are evolving and are frequently unclear and inconsistent among various jurisdictions, making compliance challenging. We have an ongoing program designed to comply with escheatment laws as they apply to our business. In the United States, we are subject to the laws of various states which from time to time take inconsistent or conflicting positions regarding the requirements to escheat property to a particular state. In some instances, we escheat items to states pursuant to statutory requirements and then subsequently pay those items to consumers. For such amounts, we must file claims for reimbursement from the states. Furthermore, certainCertain foreign jurisdictions do not have escheatment provisions which apply to our transactions. In these jurisdictions where there is not a requirement to escheat, and when, by utilizing historical data we determine that the likelihood is remote that the item will be paid out, we record a reduction to our payment service obligation and recognize an equivalent amount as a component of fee and other revenue.
In certain cases, regulations may provide administrative discretion regarding enforcement. As a result, regulations may be applied inconsistently across the industry, which could result in additional costs for the Company that may not be required to be incurred by some of its competitors. If the Company were required to maintain a price higher than its competitors to reflect its regulatory costs, this could harm its ability to compete effectively, which could adversely affect its results of operations. In addition, changes in laws, regulations or other industry practices and standards, or interpretations of legal or regulatory requirements, may reduce the market for or value of our products or services or render our products or services less profitable or obsolete. Changes in the laws affecting the kinds of entities that are permitted to act as money transfer agents (such as changes in requirements for capitalization or ownership) could adversely affect our ability to distribute our services and the cost of providing such services. Many of our agents are in the check cashing industry. Any regulatory action that negatively impacts check cashers could also cause this portion of our agent base to decline. If onerous regulatory requirements were imposed on our agents, the requirements could lead to a loss of agents, which, in turn, could lead to a loss of retail business.
Any violation by us of the laws and regulations set forth above could lead to significant fines or penalties and could limit our ability to conduct business in some jurisdictions. Our systems, employees and processes may notIn some cases, we could be sufficient to detect and prevent violationsliable for the failure of the laws and regulations set forth above by our agents or their subagents to comply with laws, which could also leadhave an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As a result, the risk of adverse regulatory action against the Company because of actions of its agents or subagents and the cost to us being subject to significant fines or penalties.monitor our agents and subagents has increased. In addition to these fines and penalties, a failure by us or our agents to comply with applicable laws and regulations also could seriously damage our reputation and result in diminished revenue and profit and increase our operating costs and could result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses or registrations, loss of approved status, termination of contracts with banks or retail representatives, administrative enforcement actions and fines, class action lawsuits, cease and desist orders and civil and criminal liability. The occurrence of one or more of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In certain cases, regulations may provide administrative discretion regarding enforcement. As a result, regulations may be applied inconsistently across the industry, which could result in additional costs for the Company that may not be required to be incurred by some of its competitors. If the Company were required to maintain a price higher than its competitors to reflect its regulatory costs, this could harm its ability to compete effectively, which could adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, changes in laws, regulations or other industry practices and standards, or interpretations of legal or regulatory requirements, may reduce the market for or value of our products or services or render our products or services less profitable or obsolete. For example, policy makers may impose heightened customer due diligence requirements or other restrictions
or fees on remittances. Changes in the laws affecting the kinds of entities that are permitted to act as money transfer agents (such as changes in requirements for capitalization or ownership) could adversely affect our ability to distribute certain of our services and the cost of providing such services. Many of our agents are in the check cashing industry. Any regulatory action that negatively impacts check cashers could also cause this portion of our agent base to decline. If onerous regulatory requirements were imposed on our agents, the requirements could lead to a loss of agents, which, in turn, could lead to a loss of retail business.
Litigation or investigations involving us or our agents could result in material settlements, fines or penalties and may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have been, and in the future may be, subject to allegations and complaints that individuals or entities have used our money transfer services for fraud-induced money transfers, as well as certain money laundering activities, which may result in fines, penalties, judgments, settlements and litigation expenses. We also are the subject from time to time of litigation related to our business. The outcome of such allegations, complaints, claims and litigation cannot be predicted.
Regulatory and judicial proceedings and potential adverse developments in connection with ongoing litigation may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. There may also be adverse publicity associated with lawsuits and investigations that could decrease agent and consumer acceptance of our services. Additionally, our business has been in the past, and may be in the future, the subject of class action lawsuits, regulatory actions and investigations and other general litigation. The outcome of class action lawsuits, regulatory actions and investigations and other litigation is difficult to assess or quantify but may include substantial fines and expenses, as well as the revocation of required licenses or registrations or the loss of approved status, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations or consumers’ confidence in our business. Plaintiffs or regulatory agencies in these lawsuits, actions or investigations may seek recovery of very large or indeterminate amounts, and the magnitude of these actions may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. The cost to defend or settle future lawsuits or investigations may be significant. In addition, improper activities, lawsuits or investigations involving our agents may adversely impact our business operations or reputation even if we are not directly involved.
We face possible uncertainties relating to compliance with and the extension and impact of the deferred prosecution agreement entered into with the U.S. federal government.
In November 2012, we announced that we had entered into a five-year DPA with the MDPA/U.S. DOJ relating to the investigation of transactions involving certain of the Company’s U.S. and Canadian agents, as well as its fraud complaint data and consumer anti-fraud program, during the period from 2003 to early 2009. Under the DPA, the Company agreed to pay to the U.S. a $100.0 million forfeiture that is available to victims of the consumer fraud scams perpetrated through MoneyGram agents.
Pursuant to the DPA, the MDPA/U.S. DOJ filed a two-count criminal Information in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The MDPA/U.S. DOJ will seek dismissal with prejudice of the Information if the Company has complied with its obligations during the five-year term of the DPA. Under the DPA, the Company has agreed, among other things, to retain an independent compliance monitor (the “Compliance Monitor”) for a period of five years, subject to adjustmentyears. On November 1, 2017, the Company agreed to a shorter period under certain circumstances. Ifstipulation with the Government that the term of the Company’s DPA be extended for 90 days to February 6, 2018. On January 31, 2018, the Company fails to make progress towards its compliance obligations underagreed with the DPA, the independent compliance monitor could issue an unfavorable report, which could lead to heightened scrutiny by the MDPA and the U.S. DOJ, and if the Company is unable to meet the requirements contained in the DPA in the allotted time period,Government that the term of the DPA be extended for an additional 45 days to March 23, 2018. The purpose of the extension is to provide the Company and the independent compliance monitor could be extended, which could result inGovernment additional costs.
Iftime to discuss whether the Company fails to comply with the DPA, the MDPA/U.S. DOJ have the right to prosecute the Company. While the Company expects to beis in compliance with the DPA. There can be no assurance that the Company and the Government will be able to negotiate a mutually satisfactory outcome during such 45 day period (or during any further short-term extension of the DPA) or that such outcome will not include a further extension of the DPA, financial penalties or additional restrictions on the Company, including a failuremonitorship period beyond the current monitorship that ends on April 30, 2018. The terms of any agreement with the Government could impose significant additional costs upon the Company related to comply,compliance and aother required terms, which could have an adverse impact on the Company's operations. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the Government will not seek any other remedy, including criminal prosecution and financial penalties, in lieu of an extension of the DPA and the monitorship. A prosecution of the Company by the MDPA/U.S. DOJ,Government or the imposition of significant financial penalties could lead to a severe material adverse effect upon the Company’s ability to conduct its business. Additionally, the terms ofFurthermore, neither the DPA impose additional costs uponnor any agreement with the Company related to compliance and other required terms, and such additional compliance costs have been and continue to be substantial. Additional compliance obligations could also have an adverse impact on the Company's operations. Furthermore, this does notMDPA/U.S. DOJ would resolve allany inquiries from other governmental agencies, such as FinCEN, which could result in additional costs, expenses and fines.
The Company does not anticipate material adverse consequences from entry into the DPAhas recorded an $85.0 million accrual in connection with a possible resolution of this matter, based on the Company’s reputationfacts and business, but therecircumstances known at the time. However, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate loss and no assurance can be no assurancegiven that such unanticipated consequencesfuture costs and payments made in connection with this matter will not occur.exceed the amount currently recorded or that the government will not also seek to impose non-monetary remedies or penalties.
Current and proposed regulation addressing consumerdata privacy and data usecybersecurity laws and security could increase our costs of operations, whichregulations could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to requirements relating to data privacy and data use and securitycybersecurity under U.S. federal, state and foreign laws. For example, the United States Federal Trade Commission routinely investigates the privacy practices of companies and has commenced enforcement actions against many, resulting in multi-million dollar settlements and multi-year agreements governing the settling companies' privacy practices. In addition, recent changes to the data protection regimeGeneral Data Protection Regulation in the European Union, mayeffective May 2018, will impose additionala higher standard of personal data protection and privacy requirements.with significant penalties for non-compliance for companies operating in the European Union or doing business with European Union residents. If we are unable to meet such requirements, we may be subject to significant fines or penalties. Furthermore, certain industry groups require us to adhere to privacy requirements in
addition to federal, state and foreign laws, and certain of our business relationships depend upon our compliance with these requirements. As the number of countries enacting privacy and related laws increases and the scope of these laws and enforcement efforts expands, we will increasingly become subject to new and varying requirements. Failure to comply with existing or future data privacy and data use and securitycybersecurity laws, regulations and requirements, including by reason of inadvertent disclosure of personal information, could result in fines, sanctions, penalties or othersignificant adverse consequences, including reputational harm, civil litigation, regulatory enforcement, costs of remediation, increased expenses for security systems and loss of consumer confidence, whichpersonnel, harm to our consumers and harm to our agents. These consequences could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, in connection with regulatory requirements to assist in the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing and pursuant to legal obligations and authorizations, the Company makes information available to certain United States federal and state, as well as certain foreign, government agencies when required by law.agencies. In recent years, the Company has experienced increasing data sharing requests by these agencies, particularly in connection with efforts to prevent terrorist financing or reduce the risk of identity theft. During the same period, there has also been increased public attention to the corporate use and disclosure of personal information, accompanied by legislation and regulations intended to strengthen data protection, information security and consumer privacy. These regulatory goals may conflict, and the law in these areas is not consistent or settled. While we believe that we are compliant with our regulatory responsibilities, the legal, political and business environments in these areas are rapidly changing, and subsequent legislation, regulation, litigation, court rulings or other events could expose us to increased program costs, liability and reputational damage that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we fail to successfully develop and timely introduce new and enhanced products and services or if we make substantial investments in an unsuccessful new product, service or infrastructure change, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our future growth will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to develop and successfully introduce new and enhanced methods of providing money transfer, bill payment, money order, official check and related services that keep pace with competitive introductions, technological changes and the demands and preferences of our agents, financial institution customers and consumers. If alternative payment mechanisms become widely substituted for our current products and services, and we do not develop and offer similar alternative payment mechanisms successfully and on a timely basis, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. We may make future investments or enter into strategic alliances to develop new technologies and services or to implement infrastructure changes to further our strategic objectives, strengthen our existing businesses and remain competitive. Such investments and strategic alliances, however, are inherently risky, and we cannot guarantee that such investments or strategic alliances will be successful. If such investments and strategic alliances are not successful, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We conduct money transfer transactions through agents in some regions that are politically volatile or, in a limited number of cases, are subject to certain OFAC restrictions.
We conduct money transfer transactions through agents in some regions that are politically volatile or, in a limited number of cases, are subject to certain OFAC restrictions. It is possible that our money transfer services or other products could be used in contravention of applicable law or regulations. Such circumstances could result in increased compliance costs, regulatory inquiries, suspension or revocation of required licenses or registrations, seizure or forfeiture of assets and the imposition of civil and criminal fees and penalties. In addition to monetary fines or penalties that we could incur, we could be subject to reputational harm that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in tax laws and unfavorable outcomes of tax positions we take could adversely affect our tax expense and liquidity.
Our future tax rate could be adversely affected by changes in tax laws, both domestically and internationally. From time to time, the U.S. and foreign, state and local governments consider legislation that could increase our effective tax rates. If changes to applicable tax laws are enacted, our results of operations could be negatively impacted.
We file tax returns and take positions with respect to federal, state, local and international taxation, including positions that relate to our historical securities losses, and our tax returns and tax positions are subject to review and audit by taxing authorities. The Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") issued a Revenue Agent Report (“RAR”) for the tax years 2011 through 2013 that included disallowing $100.0 million of deductions related to payments the Company made to the U.S. government in connection with the DPA. While we have filed a protest letter contesting this adjustment, we may not be successful in maintaining our original tax position. An unfavorable outcome in these audits or other tax reviews or audits could result in higher tax expense, including interest and penalties, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. We establish reserves for material known tax exposures; however, there can be no assurance that an actual taxation event would not exceed our reserves.
Our substantial debt service obligations, significant debt covenant requirements and our credit rating could impair our access to capital and financial condition and adversely affect our ability to operate and grow our business.
We have substantial interest expense on our debt, and our ratings are below “investment grade.” This requires that we access capital markets that are subject to higher volatility than those that support higher rated companies. Since a significant portion of our cash flow from operations is dedicated to debt service, a reduction in cash flow could result in an event of default, or significantly restrict our access to capital. Our ratings below investment grade also create the potential for a cost of capital that is higher than other companies with which we compete. Further, our debt is subject to floating interest rates. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions and other factors beyond our control. A significant increase in interest rates could have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
We are also subject to capital requirements imposed by various regulatory bodies throughout the world. We may need access to external capital to support these regulatory requirements in order to maintain our licenses and our ability to earn revenue in these jurisdictions. An interruption of our access to capital could impair our ability to conduct business if our regulatory capital falls below requirements.
Weakness in economic conditions could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our money transfer business relies in part on the overall strength of global and local economic conditions. Our consumers tend to be employed in industries such as construction, energy, manufacturing and retail that tend to be cyclical and more significantly impacted by weak economic conditions than other industries. This may result in reduced job opportunities for our customers in the U.S. or other countries that are important to our business, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, sustained weakness in the price of oil could adversely affect economic conditions and lead to reduced job opportunities in certain regions that constitute a significant portion of our total money transfer volume, which could result in a decrease in our transaction volume. In addition, increases in employment opportunities may lag other elements of any economic recovery.
Our agents or billers may have reduced sales or business as a result of weak economic conditions. As a result, our agents could reduce their number of locations or hours of operation, or cease doing business altogether. Our billers may have fewer consumers making payments to them, particularly billers in those industries that may be more affected by an economic downturn such as the automobile, mortgage and retail industries.
If economic conditions were to deteriorate in a market important to our business, our revenue, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted. Additionally, if our consumer transactions decline due to deteriorating economic conditions, we may be unable to timely and effectively reduce our operating costs or take other actions in response, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
There are a number of risks associated with our international sales and operations that could adversely affect our business.
We provide money transfer services between and among more than 200 countries and territories and continue to expand in various international markets. Our ability to grow in international markets and our future results could be adversely affected by a number of factors, including:
changes in political and economic conditions and potential instability in certain regions, including in particular the recent civil unrest, terrorism, and political turmoil and economic uncertainty in Africa, the Middle East and other regions;
restrictions on money transfers to, from and between certain countries;
currency controls, new currency adoptions and repatriation issues;
changes in regulatory requirements or in foreign policy, including the adoption of domestic or foreign laws, regulations and interpretations detrimental to our business;
possible increased costs and additional regulatory burdens imposed on our business;
the implementation of U.S. sanctions, resulting in bank closures in certain countries and the ultimate freezing of our assets;
burdens of complying with a wide variety of laws and regulations;
possible fraud or theft losses, and lack of compliance by international representatives in foreign legal jurisdictions where collection and legal enforcement may be difficult or costly;
reduced protection of our intellectual property rights;
unfavorable tax rules or trade barriers;
inability to secure, train or monitor international agents; and
failure to successfully manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates, in particular with respect to the euro.
In particular, a portion of our revenue is generated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. As a result, we are subject to risks associated with changes in the value of our revenues denominated in foreign currencies. Fluctuations inIn addition, we maintain significant foreign currency exchange ratesbalances that are subject to volatility, and could adversely affect our financial condition.result in losses due to a devaluation of the U.S. dollar. See “Enterprise Risk Management-Foreign Currency Risk” in Item 7A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.
We conduct money transfer transactions through agents in some regions that are politically volatile, which could increase our cost of operating in those regions. For example, it is possible that our money transfer services or other products could be used in contravention of applicable law or regulations. Such circumstances could result in increased compliance costs, regulatory inquiries, suspension or revocation of required licenses or registrations, seizure or forfeiture of assets and the imposition of civil and criminal fees and penalties, or other restrictions on our business operations. In addition to monetary fines or penalties that we could incur, we could be subject to reputational harm that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have submitted a Voluntary Self-Disclosure to OFAC that could result in penalties from OFAC, which could have a material adverse impact on our business or financial condition.
We have policies and procedures designed to prevent transactions that are subject to economic and trade sanctions programs administered by OFAC and by certain foreign jurisdictions that prohibit or restrict transactions to or from (or dealings with or involving) certain countries, their governments, and in certain circumstances, their nationals, as well as with certain individuals and entities such as narcotics traffickers, terrorists and terrorist organizations. If such policies and procedures are not effective in preventing such transactions, we may violate sanctions programs, which could have a material adverse impact on our business.
In 2015, we initiated an internal investigation to identify payments processed by the Company that were violations of OFAC sanctions regulations. We notified OFAC of the internal investigation, which was conducted in conjunction with the Company's outside counsel. On March 28, 2017, we filed a Voluntary Self-Disclosure with OFAC regarding the findings of our internal investigation. OFAC is currently reviewing the results of the Company’s investigation. OFAC has broad discretion to assess potential violations and impose penalties. At this time, it is not possible to determine the outcome of this matter, or the significance, if any, to our business, financial condition or operations, and we cannot predict when OFAC will conclude their review of our Voluntary Self-Disclosure. Adverse findings or penalties imposed by OFAC could have a material adverse impact on our business or financial condition.
Major bank failure or sustained financial market illiquidity, or illiquidity at our clearing, cash management and custodial financial institutions, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face certain risks in the event of a sustained deterioration of financial market liquidity, as well as in the event of sustained deterioration in the liquidity, or failure, of our clearing, cash management and custodial financial institutions. In particular:
We may be unable to access funds in our investment portfolio, deposit accounts and clearing accounts on a timely basis to settle our payment instruments, pay money transfers and make related settlements to agents. Any resulting need to access other sources of liquidity or short-term borrowing would increase our costs. Any delay or inability to settle our payment instruments, pay money transfers or make related settlements with our agents could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In the event of a major bank failure, we could face major risks to the recovery of our bank deposits used for the purpose of settling with our agents, and to the recovery of a significant portion of our investment portfolio. A substantial portion of our cash, cash equivalents and interest-bearing deposits are either held at banks that are not subject to insurance protection against loss or exceed the deposit insurance limit.
Our Revolving Credit Facility is one source of funding for our corporate transactions and liquidity needs. If any of the banks participating in our Revolving Credit Facility were unable or unwilling to fulfill its lending commitment to us, our short-term liquidity and ability to engage in corporate transactions, such as acquisitions, could be adversely affected.
We may be unable to borrow from financial institutions or institutional investors on favorable terms, which could adversely impact our ability to pursue our growth strategy and fund key strategic initiatives, such as product development and acquisitions.
If financial liquidity deteriorates, there can be no assurance we will not experience an adverse effect, which may be material, on our ability to access capital and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
An inability by us or our agents to maintain adequate banking relationships may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on domestic and international banks for international cash management, electronic funds transfer and wire transfer services to pay money transfers and settle with our agents. We also rely on domestic banks to provide clearing, processing and settlement functions for our paper-based instruments, including official checks and money orders. Our relationships with these banks are a critical component of our ability to conduct our official check, money order and money transfer businesses. AnThe inability on our part to maintain existing or establish new banking relationships sufficient to enable us to conduct our official check, money order and money transfer businesses could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to establish and maintain adequate banking relationships.
If we cannot maintain sufficient relationships with large international banks that provide these services, we would be required to establish a global network of local banks to provide us with these services or implement alternative cash management procedures, which may result in increased costs. Relying on local banks in each country in which we do business could alter the complexity of our treasury operations, degrade the level of automation, visibility and service we currently receive from banks and affect patterns of settlement with our agents. This could result in an increase in operating costs and an increase in the amount of time it takes to concentrate agent remittances and to deliver agent payables, potentially adversely impacting our cash flow, working capital needs and exposure to local currency value fluctuations.
We and our agents are considered Money Service Businesses in the U.S. under the Bank Secrecy Act. U.S. regulators are increasingly taking the position that Money Service Businesses, as a class, are high risk businesses. In addition, the creation of anti-money laundering laws has created concern and awareness among banks of the negative implications of aiding and abetting money laundering activity. As a result, banks may choose not to provide banking services to Money Services Businesses in certain regions due to the risk of additional regulatory scrutiny and the cost of building and maintaining additional compliance functions. In addition, certain foreign banks have been forced to terminate relationships with Money Services Businesses by U.S. correspondent banks. As a result, we and certain of our agents have been denied access to retail banking services in certain markets by banks that have sought to reduce their exposure to Money Services Businesses and not as a result of any concern related to the Company’s
compliance programs. If we or our agents are unable to obtain sufficient banking relationships, we or they may not be able to offer our services in a particular region, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A breach of security in the systems on which we rely could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on a variety of technologies to provide security for our systems. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments, including improper acts by third parties, may result in a compromise or breach of the security measures we use to protect our systems. We obtain, transmit and store confidential consumer, employer and agent information in connection with certain of our services. These activities are subject to laws and regulations in the U.S. and other jurisdictions. The requirements imposed by these laws and regulations, which often differ materially among the many jurisdictions, are designed to protect the privacy of personal information and to prevent that information from being inappropriately disclosed. Any security breaches in our computer networks, databases or facilities could lead to the inappropriate use or disclosure of personal information, which could harm our business and reputation, adversely affect consumers’ confidence in our or our agents' business, cause inquiries and fines or penalties from regulatory or governmental authorities, cause a loss of consumers, subject us to lawsuits and subject us to potential financial losses. In addition, we may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against these security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by these breaches. Our agents and third-party independent contractors may also experience security breaches involving the storage and transmission of our data as well as the ability to initiate unauthorized transactions. If users gain improper access to our, our agents' or our third-party independent contractors' computer networks or databases, they may be able to steal, publish, delete or modify confidential customer information or generate unauthorized money transfers. Such a breach could expose us to monetary liability, losses and legal proceedings, lead to reputational harm, cause a disruption in our operations, or make our consumers and agents less confident in our services, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Because our business is particularly dependent on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our information technology, computer network systems and data centers, disruptions to these systems and data centers could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to provide reliable services largely depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer network systems and data centers. Our business involves the movement of large sums of money and the management of data necessary to do so. The success of our business particularly depends upon the efficient and error-free handling of transactions and data. We rely on the ability of our employees and our internal systems and processes to process these transactions in an efficient, uninterrupted and error-free manner.
In the event of a breakdown, catastrophic event (such as fire, natural disaster, power loss, telecommunications failure or physical break-in), security breach, computer virus, improper operation, improper action by our employees, agents, consumers, financial institutions or third-party vendors or any other event impacting our systems or processes or our agents' or vendors’ systems or processes, we could suffer financial loss, loss of consumers, regulatory sanctions, lawsuits and damage to our reputation or consumers’ confidence in our business. The measures we have enacted, such as the implementation of disaster recovery plans and redundant computer systems, may not be successful. We may also experience problems other than system failures, including software defects, development delays and installation difficulties, which would harm our business and reputation and expose us to potential liability and increased operating expenses. In addition, any work stoppages or other labor actions by employees who support our systems or perform any of our major functions could adversely affect our business. Certain of our agent contracts, including our contract with Walmart, contain service level standards pertaining to the operation of our system, and give the agent a right to collect damages or engage other providers and, in extreme situations, a right of termination for system downtime exceeding agreed upon service levels. If we experience significant system interruptions or system failures, our business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for all losses or damages that we may incur.
In addition, our ability to continue to provide our services to a growing number of agents and consumers, as well as to enhance our existing services and offer new services, is dependent on our information technology systems. If we are unable to effectively manage the technology associated with our business, we could experience increased costs, reductions in system availability and loss of agents or consumers. Any failure of our systems in scalability, reliability and functionality could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Continued weakness in economic conditions, in bothFrom time to time, the U.S. and global markets,foreign, state and local governments consider legislation that could increase our effective tax rates. If changes to applicable tax laws are enacted that significantly increase our corporate tax rate, our net income could be negatively impacted.
We file tax returns and take positions with respect to federal, state, local and international taxation, and our tax returns and tax positions are subject to review and audit by taxing authorities. An unfavorable outcome in a tax review or audit could result in higher tax expense, including interest and penalties, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows. We establish reserves for material known tax exposures; however, there can be no assurance that an actual taxation event would not exceed our reserves.
Recently enacted changes to the U.S. federal tax laws could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our money transfer business relies in part onOn December 22, 2017, the overall strengthlegislation commonly known as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (the “TCJA”), which significantly revises the Internal Revenue Code of global economic conditions1986, as well as international migration patterns. Consumer money transfer transactions and international migration patterns are affected by,amended, was enacted. The TCJA, among other things, employment opportunitiescontains significant changes to the U.S. corporate tax laws, including a permanent reduction of the corporate income tax rate, a limitation on the deductibility of business interest expense, limitation of the deduction for certain net operating losses to 80% of current year taxable income, an indefinite net operating loss carryforward, immediate deductions for new investments in certain business assets instead of deductions for depreciation expense over time, modification or repeal of many business deductions and overall economic conditions. Our consumers tendcredits (including certain foreign tax credits), a shift of the U.S. taxation of multinational corporations from a tax on worldwide income to be employed in industries such as construction, energy, manufacturinga modified territorial system (retaining certain existing rules and retail that tendcontaining new rules designed to be cyclical and more significantly impacted by weak economic conditions than other industries. This may result in reduced job opportunities for our customersinclude in the U.S. income tax base certain income generated in non-U.S. territories whether or other countriesnot that are importantincome has been repatriated to our business, which could adversely affect our business, financial conditionthe U.S.), a minimum taxing system related to payments deemed to erode the U.S. tax base, and results of operations. For example, sustained weaknessa one-time tax on accumulated offshore earnings held in cash and illiquid assets (with the price of oil could adversely affect economic conditions and leadlatter taxed at a lower rate). We continue to reduced job opportunities in certain regions that constitute a significant portion of our total money transfer volume, which could result in a decrease in our transaction volume. In addition, increases in employment opportunities may lag other elements of any economic recovery.
Our agents or billersexamine the impact the TCJA may have reduced sales or business as a result of weak economic conditions. As a result, our agents could reduce their number of locations or hours of operation, or cease doing business altogether. Our billers may have fewer consumers making payments to them, particularly billers in those industries that may be more affected by an economic downturn such as the automobile, mortgageon us, and retail industries.
If general market conditions in the U.S. or international economies important to our business were to deteriorate, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted. Additionally, if our consumer transactions decline or international migration patterns shift due to deteriorating economic conditions, we may be unable to timely and effectively reduce our operating costs or take other actions in response, whichit could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A significant change or disruption in international migration patterns could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our money transfer business relies in part on international migration patterns, as individuals move from their native countries to countries with greater economic opportunities or a more stable political environment. A significant portion of money transfer transactions are initiated by immigrants or refugees sending money back to their native countries. Changes in immigration laws that discourage international migration and political or other events (such as war, terrorism or health emergencies) that make it more difficult for individuals to migrate or work abroad could adversely affect our money transfer remittance volume or growth rate. Sustained weakness in global economic conditions could reduce economic opportunities for migrant workers and result in reduced or disrupted international migration patterns. Reduced or disrupted international migration patterns, particularly in the U.S. or Europe, are likely to reduce money transfer transaction volumes and therefore have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, significant changes in international migration patterns could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Concerns regarding the financial health of certain European countries, and the impact that these countries might have on the sustainability of the euro, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financing.
In the normal course of our business, we maintain significant euro denominated cash balances. In 2015, the euro was our second largest currency position in the world following the U.S. dollar. The secession of a country from the euro, the demise of the use of the euro or a significant decline in the European economies could result in a sudden and substantial devaluation of the euro and other currencies against the U.S. dollar. Such a development could reduce the value of our euro-denominated deposits and adversely impact the profitability of our business in the Eurozone. In addition, our ability to generate fee revenue from our money transfer business could be impaired if the level of economic activity in the Eurozone were to decrease. A significant decline in European economies could also lead to financial market impairment and restricted bank liquidity. Our ability to fund our operations could be impaired if our access to our euro deposits were restricted, or if damage to the banking system were to result from a currency or an economic crisis.
We face credit risks from our retail agents and financial institution customers.institutions with which we do business.
The vast majority of our money transfer, bill payment and money order business is conducted through independent agents that provide our products and services to consumers at their business locations. Our agents receive the proceeds from the sale of our payment instruments and money transfers, and we must then collect these funds from the agents. If an agent becomes insolvent, files for bankruptcy, commits fraud or otherwise fails to remit payment instruments or money transfer proceeds to us, we must nonetheless pay the payment instrument or complete the money transfer on behalf of the consumer.
Moreover, we have made, and may make in the future, secured or unsecured loans to retail agents under limited circumstances or allow agents to retain our funds for a period of time before remitting them to us. As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had credit exposure to our agents of $652.1$549.0 million in the aggregate spread across 15,88814,344 agents.
Our official check outsourcingFinancial institutions, which are utilized to conduct business is conducted through banks and credit unions. Their customersfor our Financial Paper Products segment, issue official checks and money orders and remit to us the face amounts of those instruments the day after they are issued. We may be liable for payment on all of those instruments. As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had credit exposure to ourfor official checkchecks and money orders conducted by financial institution customersinstitutions of $265.0$293.7 million in the aggregate spread across 904923 financial institutions.
We monitor the creditworthiness of our agents and the financial institution customersinstitutions with which we do business on an ongoing basis. There can be no assurance that the models and approaches we use to assess and monitor the creditworthiness of our agents and these financial institution customersinstitutions will be sufficiently predictive, and we may be unable to detect and take steps to timely mitigate an increased credit risk.
In the event of an agent bankruptcy, we would generally be in the position of creditor, possibly with limited security or financial guarantees of performance,no security, and we would therefore be at risk of a reduced recovery. We are not insured against credit losses, except in circumstances of agent theft or fraud. Significant credit losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to adequately protect our brand and the intellectual property rights related to our existing and any new or enhanced products and services, or if we infringe on the rights of others, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
The MoneyGram brand is important to our business. We utilize trademark registrations in various countries and other tools to protect our brand. Our business would be harmed if we were unable to adequately protect our brand and the value of our brand was to decrease as a result.
We rely on a combination of patent, trademark and copyright laws, trade secret protection and confidentiality and license agreements to protect the intellectual property rights related to our products and services. We also investigate the intellectual property rights of third parties to prevent our infringement of those rights. We may be subject to third-party claims alleging that we infringe their intellectual property rights or have misappropriated other proprietary rights. We may be required to spend resources to defend such claims or to protect and police our own rights. Some of our intellectual property rights may not be protected by intellectual property laws, particularly in foreign jurisdictions. The loss of our intellectual property protection, the inability to secure or enforce intellectual property protection or to successfully defend against claims of intellectual property infringement could harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operation.
Failure to attract and retain key employees could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Our success depends to a large extent upon our ability to attract and retain key employees. Qualified individuals with experience in our industry are in high demand. In addition, legal or enforcement actions against compliance and other personnel in the money transfer industry may affect our ability to attract and retain key employees. The lack of management continuity or the loss of one or more members of our executive management team could harm our business and future development. A failure to attract and retain key personnel could also have a material adverse impact on our business.
The operation of retail locations and acquisition or start-up of businesses create risks and may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have Company-operated retail locations for the sale of our products and services. We may be subject to additional laws and regulations that are triggered by our ownership of retail locations and our employment of individuals who staff our retail locations. There are also certain risks inherent in operating any retail location, including theft, personal injury and property damage and long-term lease obligations.
We may, from time to time, acquire or start-up businesses both inside and outside of the U.S. The acquisition and integration of businesses involve a number of risks. Such risks include, among others:
risks in connection with acquisitions and start-ups and potential expenses that could be incurred in connection therewith;
risks related to the integration of new businesses, including integrating facilities, personnel, financial systems, accounting systems, distribution, operations and general operating procedures;
the diversion of capital and management’s attention from our core business;
the impact on our financial condition and results of operations due to the timing of the new business or the failure of the new business to meet operating expectations; and
the assumption of unknown liabilities relating to the new business.
Risks associated with acquiring or starting new businesses could result in increased costs and other operating inefficiencies, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Any restructuring actionsactivities and cost reduction initiatives that we undertake may not deliver the expected results and these actions may adversely affect our business operations.
We have undertaken and expect to continue tomay in the future undertake various restructuring activities and cost reduction initiatives in an effort to better align our organizational structure and costs with our strategy. These activities and initiatives can be substantial in scope and disruptive to our operations, and they can involve large expenditures. In fiscal years 2015 and 2014, we incurred restructuring charges of $5.0 million and $16.3 million, respectively. Such activities could result in significant disruptions to our operations, including adversely affecting the timeliness of product releases, the successful implementation and completion of our strategic objectives and the results of our operations. If we do not fully realize or maintain the anticipated benefits of any restructuring plan or cost reduction initiative, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Failure to maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are required to certify and report on our compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404. In order to achieve effective internal controls, we may need to enhance our accounting
systems or processes, which could increase our cost of doing business. Any failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Stock
THL owns a substantial percentage of our common stock, and its interests may differ from the interests of our other common stockholders.
As of December 31, 2015, THL2017, Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. (“THL”) held 44.6 percent43.8% of our outstanding common shares and 38.2 percent37.6% of our outstanding shares on a fully-converted basis (if all of the outstanding shares of the Series D StockParticipating Convertible Preferred (the "D Stock") were converted to common shares), excluding treasury shares held by the Company. Together,The combined ownership percentage of THL and affiliates of Goldman Sachs & Co. (“Goldman Sachs” and, collectively with THL, the Investors’ ownership percentage“Investors”) on a fully-converted basis is 52.6 percentwas 51.7% as of December 31, 2015.2017. Additionally our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporationcharter provides that as long as the Investors have a right to designate directors to our Board of Directors pursuant to the Amended and Restated Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 17, 2008, among the Company and the several Investor parties named therein, THL has the right to designate two to four directors (such directors, the "THL Representatives"), who each have equal votes and who together have a total number of votes equal to the number of directors as is proportionate to the common stock ownership (on an as-converted basis) of the Investors (rounded to the nearest whole number), unlike the other members of our Board of Directors who have only one vote each. THL has appointed threetwo of the nine members of our Board of Directors, each THL Representative currently has multiple votes, and the THL Representatives together currently hold a majority of the votes of our Board of Directors.
We cannot provide assurance that the interests of THL will coincide with the interests of other holders of our common stock and THL’s substantial control over us could result in harm to the market price of our common stock by delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company; impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving our company; or entrenching our management and Board of Directors.
We have a significant number of salable common shares and D Stock held by the Investors relative to our outstanding common shares.
As of December 31, 2015,2017, there were 53.254.2 million outstanding common shares, excluding treasury shares (or 62.163.1 million common shares if the outstanding D Stock were converted into common shares). In accordance with the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 25, 2008, among the Company and the Investor parties named therein, we have an effective Registration Statement on Form S-3, or the Registration Statement, that permits the offer and sale by the Investors of all of the common shares and D Stock currently held by the Investors. As of December 31, 2015,2017, THL held approximately 23.7 million shares of our common stock and Goldman Sachs held approximately 71,282 shares of D Stock, which are convertible into approximately 8.9 million shares of our common stock. The Registration Statement also permits us to offer and sell, from time to time, up to $500 million of our common stock, preferred stock, debt securities or any combination of these securities. Sales of a substantial number of common shares, or the perception that significant sales could occur (particularly if sales are concentrated in time or amount), may depress the trading price of our common stock.
Our charter documents and Delaware law contain provisions that could delay or prevent an acquisition of the Company, which could inhibit your ability to receive a premium on your investment from a possible sale of the Company.
Our charter documents containcontains provisions that may discourage third parties from seeking to acquire the Company. These provisions and specific provisions of Delaware law relating to business combinations with interested stockholders may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing certain business combinations, including a merger or change in control of the Company. Some of these provisions may discourage a future acquisition of the Company even if stockholders would receive an attractive value for their shares or if a significant number of our stockholders believed such a proposed transaction to be in their best interests. As a result, stockholders who desire to participate in such a transaction may not have the opportunity to do so.
Our bylaws designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.
Our bylaws provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or employees to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and such persons. Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisions of our bylaws inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our Board of Directors has the power to issue series of preferred stock and to designate the rights and preferences of those series, which could adversely affect the voting power, dividend, liquidation and other rights of holders of our common stock.
Under our certificate of incorporation,charter, our Board of Directors has the power to issue series of preferred stock and to designate the rights and preferences of those series. Therefore, our Board of Directors may designate a new series of preferred stock with the rights, preferences and privileges that theour Board of Directors deems appropriate, including special dividend, liquidation and voting rights. The creation and designation of a new series of preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power, dividend, liquidation and other rights of holders of our common stock and, possibly, any other class or series of stock that is then in existence.
The market price of our common stock may be volatile.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, some of which may be beyond our control. These factors include the perceived prospects or actual operating results of our business; changes in estimates of our operating results by analysts, investors or our management; our actual operating results relative to such estimates or expectations; actions or announcements by us or our competitors; litigation and judicial decisions; legislative or regulatory actions; and changes in general economic or market conditions. In addition, the stock market in general has from time to time experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. These market fluctuations could reduce the market price of our common stock for reasons unrelated to our operating performance.
Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Item 2. PROPERTIES
Our leased corporate offices are located in Dallas, TX. We have a number of offices leased in more than 30 countries and territories around the world including, but not limited to: U.S., United Kingdom, Poland and United Arab Emirates. These offices provide operational, sales and marketing support.support and are used by both our Global Funds Transfer Segment and our Financial Paper Products Segment. We believe that our properties are sufficient to meet our current and projected needs. We periodically review our facility requirements and may acquire new facilities, or modify, consolidate, dispose of or sublet existing facilities, based on business needs.
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The matters set forth below are subject to uncertainties and outcomes that are not predictable. The Company accrues for these matters as any resulting losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated. Further, the Company maintains insurance coverage for many claims and litigation alleged.matters.
Litigation Commenced Against the Company:
Class Action Securities Litigation -On April 15, 2015, a putative securities class action lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, County of New Castle, against MoneyGram, all of its directors, certain of its executive officers, THL, Goldman Sachs and the underwriters of the secondary public offering of the Company’s common stock that closed on April 2, 2014 (the “2014 Offering”). The lawsuit was brought by the Iron Workers District Council of New England Pension Fund seeking to represent a class consisting of all purchasers of the Company’s common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the Company’s registration statement and prospectus, and all documents incorporated by reference therein, issued in connection with the 2014 Offering. The lawsuit alleges violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), due to allegedly false and misleading statements in connection with the 2014 Offering and seeks unspecified damages and other relief. On May 19, 2015, MoneyGram and the other defendants filed a notice of removal to the federal district court of the District of Delaware. On June 18, 2015, the plaintiff filed a motion to remand the case back to Delaware State Court. The Company believes that the claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against the lawsuit. The Company is unable to predict the outcome, or the possible loss or range of loss, if any, related to this matter.
Other Matters — The Company is involved in various other claims and litigation that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of the Company's business. Management does not believe that after final disposition any of these matters is likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Government Investigations:
State Civil Investigative DemandsOFAC — MoneyGram has received Civil Investigative Demands from a working group of nine state attorneys general who haveIn 2015, we initiated an internal investigation into whetherto identify any payments processed by the Company took adequate stepsthat were violations of the U.S. Department of the Treasury's OFAC sanctions regulations. We notified OFAC of the ongoing internal investigation, which was conducted in conjunction with the Company's outside counsel. On March 28, 2017, we filed a Voluntary Self-Disclosure with OFAC regarding the findings of our internal investigation. OFAC is currently reviewing the results of the Company’s investigation. At this time, it is not possible to preventdetermine the outcome of this matter, or the significance, if any, to our business, financial condition or results of operations, and we cannot predict when OFAC will conclude their review of our Voluntary Self-Disclosure.
Deferred Prosecution Agreement — In November 2012, we announced that a settlement was reached with the MDPA and the U.S. DOJ relating to the previously disclosed investigation of transactions involving certain of our U.S. and Canadian agents, as well as fraud complaint data and the consumer fraudanti-fraud program, during the period from 20072003 to 2014. early 2009. In connection with this settlement, we entered into the DPA with the MDPA and U.S. DOJ dated November 8, 2012.
On February 11, 2016,November 1, 2017, the Company entered intoagreed to a settlement agreementstipulation with 49 statesthe Government that the term of the Company’s DPA be extended for 90 days to February 6, 2018. On January 31, 2018, the Company agreed with the Government that the term of the DPA be
extended for an additional 45 days to March 23, 2018. The purpose of the extension is to provide the Company and the District of ColumbiaGovernment additional time to settlediscuss whether the Company is in compliance with the DPA. There can be no assurance that the Company and the Government will continue to be able to negotiate a mutually satisfactory outcome during such 45 day period (or any civil or administrative claims such attorneys general may have asserted under their consumer protection laws through the datefurther short-term extension of the settlement agreementDPA) or that such outcome will not include a further extension of the DPA, financial penalties or additional restrictions on the Company, including a monitorship period beyond the current monitorship that ends on April 30, 2018. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the Government will not seek any other remedy, including criminal prosecution and financial penalties, in lieu of an extension of the DPA and monitorship.
As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company recorded an $85.0 million accrual in connection with a possible resolution of this matter, based on the investigation. Underfacts and circumstances known at the settlement agreement,time. However, the Company will make a payment of $13.0 millionis unable to reasonably estimate the participating states toultimate loss and no assurance can be used by the states to provide restitution to consumers. The Company also agreed to implement certain enhancements to its compliance programgiven that future costs and provide periodic reports to the states party to the settlement agreement. As of December 31, 2015, the Company has accrued $13.0 millionpayments made in connection with this matter will not exceed the investigation.amount currently recorded or that the government will not also seek to impose non-monetary remedies or penalties.
Other Matters — The Company is involved in various other government inquiries and other matters that arise from time to time. Management does not believe that after final disposition any of these other matters is likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Actions Commenced by the Company:
Tax Litigation— The IRS completed its examination of the Company’s consolidated income tax returns through 2013 and issued Notices of Deficiency for 2005-2007 and 2009 and an Examination Report for 2008. The Notices of Deficiency and Examination Report disallow, among other items, approximately $900$900.0 million of ordinary deductions on securities losses in the 2007, 2008 and 2009 tax returns. In May 2012 and December 2012, the Company filed petitions in the U.S. Tax Court challenging the 2005-2007 and 2009 Notices of Deficiency, respectively. In 2013, the Company reached a partial settlement with the IRS allowing ordinary loss treatment on $186.9 million of deductions in dispute. In January 2015, the U.S. Tax Court granted the IRS's motion for summary judgment upholding the remaining adjustments in the Notices of Deficiency. During 2015, the Company made payments to the IRS of $61.0 million for federal tax payments and associated interest related to the matter. The Company believes that it has substantive tax law arguments in favor of its position andposition. The Company filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Tax Court on July 27, 2015. The U.S. Tax Court has transferred jurisdiction over the case2015 for an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Oral arguments were held before the Fifth Circuit on June 7, 2016, and on November 15, 2016, the Fifth Circuit vacated the Tax Court’s decision and remanded the case to the Tax Court for further proceedings. The Company filed a motion for summary judgment in the Tax Court on May 31, 2017. On August 23, 2017, the IRS filed a motion for summary judgment and its response to the Company’s motion for summary judgment. Pending the outcome of the appeal, the Company may be required to file amended state returns and make additional cash payments of up to $18.7 million on amounts that have previously been accrued.
See Note 13 — Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure.
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC under the symbol “MGI.” As of March 1, 2016,8, 2018, there were 8,6437,867 stockholders of record of our common stock.
The high and low sales prices for our common stock for the periods presented were as follows for the respective periods: | | | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Fiscal Quarter | High | | Low | | High | | Low | High | | Low | | High | | Low |
| First | $ | 9.58 |
| | $ | 7.55 |
| | $ | 20.35 |
| | $ | 17.02 |
| $ | 17.13 |
| | $ | 11.26 |
| | $ | 7.09 |
| | $ | 4.68 |
|
| Second | $ | 11.00 |
| | $ | 7.74 |
| | $ | 18.60 |
| | $ | 12.61 |
| $ | 17.92 |
| | $ | 15.88 |
| | $ | 7.37 |
| | $ | 5.81 |
|
| Third | $ | 10.66 |
| | $ | 7.75 |
| | $ | 14.94 |
| | $ | 12.54 |
| $ | 17.48 |
| | $ | 15.28 |
| | $ | 8.33 |
| | $ | 6.29 |
|
| Fourth | $ | 10.92 |
| | $ | 6.21 |
| | $ | 12.93 |
| | $ | 8.15 |
| $ | 16.27 |
| | $ | 12.40 |
| | $ | 12.72 |
| | $ | 5.83 |
|
TheOur Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of a total of 12,000,000 common shares, as announced in our press releases issued on November 18, 2004, August 18, 2005 and May 9, 2007. The repurchase authorization is effective until such time as the Company has repurchased 12,000,000 common shares. The Company may consider repurchasing shares which would be subject to limitations in our debt agreements. Common stock tendered to the Company in connection with the exercise of stock options or vesting of restricted stock is not considered repurchased shares under the terms of the repurchase authorization. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company had repurchased 8,277,0739,842,509 common shares under the terms of the repurchase authorization and has remaining authorization to repurchase up to 3,722,9272,157,491 shares. During the three months ended December 31, 2015,2017, the Company did not repurchase any common shares.
On April 2, 2014, the Company repurchased 8,185,092 common shares from THL at a price of $16.25 per share. These repurchases are separate from, and do not affect, the Company's repurchase program described above.
The terms of our debt agreements place significant limitations on the amount of restricted payments we may make, including dividends on our common stock and repurchases of our capital stock. Subject to certain customary conditions, we may (i) make restricted payments in an aggregate amount not to exceed $50.0 million (without regard to a pro forma leverage ratio calculation), (ii) make restricted payments up to a formulaic amount determined based on incremental build-up of our consolidated net income in future periods (subject to compliance with maximum pro forma leverage ratio calculation) and (iii) repurchase capital stock from THL and Goldman Sachs in a remaining aggregate amount up to $170.0 million. As a result, our ability to declare or pay dividends or distributions to the stockholders of the Company’s common stock is materially limited at this time. No dividends were paid on our common stock in 20152017 or 2014. See Note 11 — Stockholders’ Deficit of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure.2016.
STOCKHOLDER RETURN PERFORMANCE
The Company's peer group consists of companies that are in the money remittance and payment industries, along with companies that effectively capture our competitive landscape given the products and services that we provide. OurThe peer group is comprised of the following companies: Euronet Worldwide Inc., Fiserv, Inc., Global Payments Inc., Green Dot Corporation, Heartland Payment Systems, Inc., Higher One Holdings, Inc., MasterCard, Inc., Total System Services,Paypal Holdings, Inc., Visa, Inc. and The Western Union Company. In 2015, Xoom Corporation was removed from the Company’s peer group due its acquisition by PayPal Holdings, Inc.
The following graph compares the cumulative total return from December 31, 20102012 to December 31, 20152017 for our common stock, our peer group index of payment services companies and the S&P 500 Index. The graph assumes the investment of $100 in each of our common stock, our peer group and the S&P 500 Index on December 31, 2010,2012, and the reinvestment of all dividends as and when distributed. The graph is furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC or subject to Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
AMONG MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
S&P 500 INDEX AND PEER GROUP INDEX
*$100 invested on 12/31/20102012 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
The following table is a summary of the cumulative total return for the fiscal years ending December 31: | | | | 12/31/2010 | | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2013 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2013 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2016 | | 12/31/2017 |
| MoneyGram International, Inc. | 100.00 |
| | 81.87 |
| | 61.30 |
| | 95.85 |
| | 41.93 |
| | 28.92 |
| 100.00 |
| | 156.36 |
| | 68.40 |
| | 47.18 |
| | 88.86 |
| | 99.17 |
|
| S&P 500 | 100.00 |
| | 102.11 |
| | 118.45 |
| | 156.82 |
| | 178.29 |
| | 180.75 |
| 100.00 |
| | 132.39 |
| | 150.51 |
| | 152.59 |
| | 170.84 |
| | 208.14 |
|
| Peer Group | 100.00 |
| | 136.28 |
| | 179.87 |
| | 280.16 |
| | 313.43 |
| | 373.60 |
| 100.00 |
| | 156.03 |
| | 175.00 |
| | 205.36 |
| | 217.05 |
| | 323.71 |
|
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto. The following table presents our selected consolidated financial data for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions, except per share and location data) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014(1) | | 2013 (1) |
| Operating Results | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Global Funds Transfer segment | $ | 1,361.4 |
| | $ | 1,374.6 |
| | $ | 1,389.8 |
| | $ | 1,255.2 |
| | $ | 1,152.7 |
| $ | 1,508.1 |
| | $ | 1,553.7 |
| | $ | 1,465.8 |
| | $ | 1,470.1 |
| | $ | 1,475.0 |
|
| Financial Paper Products segment | 73.3 |
| | 80.3 |
| | 84.0 |
| | 84.5 |
| | 93.3 |
| 94.0 |
| | 75.6 |
| | 73.3 |
| | 80.3 |
| | 84.0 |
|
| Other | — |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 1.8 |
| — |
| | 1.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Total revenue | $ | 1,434.7 |
| | $ | 1,454.9 |
| | $ | 1,474.4 |
| | $ | 1,341.2 |
| | $ | 1,247.8 |
| $ | 1,602.1 |
| | $ | 1,630.4 |
| | $ | 1,539.1 |
| | $ | 1,550.4 |
| | $ | 1,559.6 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (76.9 | ) | | $ | 72.1 |
| | $ | 52.4 |
| | $ | (49.3 | ) | | $ | 59.4 |
| $ | (29.8 | ) | | $ | 15.9 |
| | $ | (77.7 | ) | | $ | 71.6 |
| | $ | 52.0 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income per common share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | (1.24 | ) | | $ | 1.10 |
| | $ | 0.73 |
| | $ | (0.69 | ) | | $ | (9.03 | ) | $ | (0.47 | ) | | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | (1.25 | ) | | $ | 1.10 |
| | $ | 0.73 |
|
| Diluted | $ | (1.24 | ) | | $ | 1.10 |
| | $ | 0.73 |
| | $ | (0.69 | ) | | $ | (9.03 | ) | $ | (0.47 | ) | | $ | 0.24 |
| | $ | (1.25 | ) | | $ | 1.09 |
| | $ | 0.72 |
|
| Financial Position | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 164.5 |
| | $ | 250.6 |
| | $ | 318.8 |
| | $ | 227.9 |
| | $ | 211.7 |
| $ | 190.0 |
| | $ | 157.2 |
| | $ | 164.5 |
| | $ | 250.6 |
| | $ | 318.8 |
|
Total assets (1) | $ | 4,505.2 |
| | $ | 4,628.3 |
| | $ | 4,775.8 |
| | $ | 5,128.4 |
| | $ | 5,149.0 |
| $ | 4,772.5 |
| | $ | 4,597.4 |
| | $ | 4,505.2 |
| | $ | 4,628.3 |
| | $ | 4,775.8 |
|
Long-term debt (1) | $ | 942.6 |
| | $ | 949.6 |
| | $ | 831.8 |
| | $ | 787.7 |
| | $ | 784.3 |
| $ | 908.1 |
| | $ | 915.2 |
| | $ | 942.6 |
| | $ | 949.6 |
| | $ | 831.8 |
|
| Stockholders’ deficit | $ | (222.8 | ) | | $ | (182.7 | ) | | $ | (77.0 | ) | | $ | (161.4 | ) | | $ | (110.2 | ) | $ | (245.3 | ) | | $ | (215.6 | ) | | $ | (229.5 | ) | | $ | (189.0 | ) | | $ | (82.8 | ) |
| |
(1) | As of December 31, 2015, the Company early adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2015-03. The amounts in prior periods have been adjusted to reflect the reclassification of the debt issuance costs previously reported in Other assets as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the Company's related debt liability. Also, in accordance with ASU 2015-15, the Company records debt issuance costs for its Revolving Credit Facility in "Other assets" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.(1) Selected financial data for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 has been corrected to reflect the adjustments related to the errors described in Note 15 — Immaterial Error Correction of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The correction of the error decreased net income by $0.5 million and $0.4 million and diluted net income per common share by $0.01 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Stockholders' deficit increased by $6.3 million and $5.8 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated due to various factors discussed below under “Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part 1, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The comparisons presented in this discussion refer to the same period in the prior year, unless otherwise noted. This discussion is organized in the following sections:
Overview
Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
OVERVIEW
MoneyGram is a global provider of innovative money transfer services and is recognized worldwide as a financial connection to friends and family. Whether online, through a mobile device, at a kiosk or in a local store, we connect consumers in any way that is convenient for them. We also provide bill payment services, issue money orders and process official checks in the U.S. and in select countries.countries and territories. We primarily offer services through third-party agents, including retail chains, independent retailers, post offices and other financial institutions. We also offer Digital/Self-Service solutions such as moneygram.com, mobile solutions, account deposit and kiosk-based services. Additionally, we have Company-operated retail locations in the U.S. and Western Europe. Additionally, we offer Digital solutions, which include moneygram.com, mobile solutions, account deposit and kiosk-based services.
We manage our revenue and related commissions expense through two reporting segments: Global Funds Transfer and Financial Paper Products. The Global Funds Transfer segment provides global money transfer services in overapproximately 350,000 agent locations in more than 200 countries and territories. Our global money transfer services are our primary revenue driver, accounting for 88 percent89% of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015.2017. The Global Funds Transfer segment also provides bill payment services to consumers through substantially all of our money transfer agent and Company-operated locations in the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico, at certain agent locations in select Caribbean and European countries and through Digital/Self-Serviceour Digital solutions. The Financial Paper Products segment provides money order services to consumers through our retail locations and financial institutions located in the U.S. and Puerto Rico, and provides official check services to financial institutions in the U.S. ExcludedCorporate expenses that are not related to our segments' performance are excluded from operating income for Global Funds Transfer and Financial Paper Products segments are corporate expenses, which are not related to our segments' performance.
See a summary of key 2015 events as disclosed in Part 1, Item 1, "2015 Events" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.segments.
Business Environment
Our 2015 financial results were impacted by lower U.S. to U.S. pricing, a competitive product in the U.S. to U.S. corridorThroughout 2017, worldwide political and the strengthening of the U.S. dollar, partially offset by the Company's transaction and money transfer revenue growth in the Non-U.S. and U.S. Outbound corridors along with the continued growth of the Digital/Self-Service channel.
The strengthening of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies ordinarily has a negative impact on our reported revenue (and conversely, the weakening of the U.S. dollar against these foreign currencies has a positive impact). However, our restructuring efforts and the diversification of our employment base outside of the U.S. better aligned the currency exposure of our expenses with our revenues, allowing much of the currency impact to be offset.
Throughout 2015, worldwide economic conditions continued to remain unstable,remained highly variable, as evidenced by high unemployment ratesboth economic growth and challenges in key markets, government assistance to citizens and businesses on a global basis, lower oil prices,low currency reserves, currency controls restricted lending activity, weak currencies, lower currency reservesin certain countries and low consumer confidence, among other factors. Historically,a volatile immigration environment. Also, there is continued political unrest and economic weakness in parts of the remittance industry has generally been resilient during times of economic softness as money transfers are deemed essentialMiddle East and Africa that contributed to many, with the funds used by the receiving party for food, housing and other basic needs.volatility. Given the global reach and extent of the current economic conditions, the growth of money transfer volumes and the average principalface value of money transfers continued to fluctuatebe highly variable by corridor and country in 2015, particularly in Europe. Also, there is continued political unrest in parts of the Middle East and Africa that contributed to the volatility.country.
As of December 31, 2015, ourWe generally compete for money transfer agent base expanded 3 percent overconsumers on the prior year, primarily due to expansion in the Africa, Asia Pacificbasis of trust, convenience, price, technology and Latin America regions. We continue to review markets where we may have an opportunity to increase our presence through agent signings and acquisitions, specifically in countries or cities where we are underrepresented.
brand recognition. The market for money transfer services remains very competitive, consisting of a small number offew large competitors and a large number of small, niche competitors, and we willcompetitors. In addition to the competitive environment, global compliance requirements are becoming increasingly more complex, which has been affecting our top line growth. We continue to encounterenhance our compliance tools to comply with various government and other regulatory programs around the globe. We also introduced self-imposed compliance measures to further protect our customers and the integrity of our network.
We continue to make progress on our journey toward becoming a digitally-enabled, customer-centric organization despite competition from new technologies that allow consumers to send and receive money in a variety of ways. We generally competebelieve that our continued investment in innovative products and services, particularly Digital solutions, such as the global expansion of moneygram.com, mobile solutions and account deposit services, positions the Company to accelerate our digital transformation and diversify our product and service offerings to meet consumers' needs. Digital solutions revenue for 2017 was $211.6 million, or 14% of money transfer consumers on the basisrevenue and increased by 9% from $194.1 million in 2016. Moneygram.com, which represents 42% of trust, convenience, availability of outlets, price, technology and brand recognition.Digital solutions revenue for 2017, grew by $17.7 million or 25% over 2016.
We are monitoring consumer behavior to ensure that we maintain growth. Pricing actions from our competitors may result in pricing changes for our products and services. On April 17, 2014, Walmart announced the launch of the Walmart white label money transfer service, a program operated by a competitor of MoneyGram, which allows consumers to transfer money between its U.S. store locations. This program limits consumers to transferring $900 per transaction. As a result, the Company's Walmart U.S. to U.S. transactions declined 40 percent and 37 percent for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In addition, on October 31, 2014, we introduced lower prices for our money transfer product in the U.S. to U.S. market and, as a result, have seen improvements including a reduction in the decline of transactions over $50 and an increase in average face value per transaction for the year ended December 31, 2015.
We continue to see a trend among state, federal and international regulators towards enhanced scrutiny of anti-money laundering compliance programs, as well as consumer fraud prevention and education. Compliance with laws and regulations is a highly complex and integral part of our day-to-day operations, thus we have continued to increase our compliance personnel headcount and make investments in our compliance-related technology and infrastructure. In the first quarter of 2013, a compliance monitor was selected pursuant to a requirement of our settlement with the MDPA and U.S. DOJ. We have received three annual reports from the compliance monitor, which have resulted in us continuing to make investments in various areas of our compliance systems and operations. We incurred $11.5 million and $6.5 million of expense directly related to the compliance monitor for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Anticipated Trends for 2016
This discussion of trends expected to impact our business in 20162018 is based on information presently available and reflects certain assumptions, including assumptions regarding future economic conditions. Differences in actual economic conditions during 2016 compared with our assumptions could have a material impact on our results. See “Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional factors that could cause results to differ materially from those contemplated by the following forward-looking statements.
Throughout 2015, global economic conditions remained weak. We cannot predict the duration or extent of the severity of the current economic conditions, nor the extent to which these conditions could negatively affect our business, operating results or financial condition. Also, the decrease in the price of oil could adversely affect economic conditions and lead to reduced job opportunities in certain regions that constitute a significant portion of our total money transfer volume, which could result in a decrease in our transaction volume. While the money remittance industry has generally been resilient during times of economic softness, the current global economic conditions have continued to adversely impact the demand for money remittances.
We continue to reviewsee increased opportunities to capitalize on growth and expansion both geographically and through product and service offerings. However, economic and political instability, which can result in currency volatility, liquidity pressure on central banks and pressure on labor markets in which wecertain countries, may have an opportunity to increase prices based on increased brand awareness, loyalty and competitive positioning. We are monitoring consumer behavior to ensure that we continue our market share growth. We continue to monitorimpact our business in 2018. Additionally, pricing pressure continues to negatively impact our growth in the U.S. to U.S. corridor for pricing actions fromchannel, along with economic issues in the Middle East and Africa, which have restricted our competitorsability to transact in certain markets.
The June 23, 2016 referendum by British voters to exit the European Union (referred to as Brexit), which may also resultwas followed by Britain providing official notice to leave the European Union in pricing changes for our productsMarch of 2017, introduced additional uncertainty in global markets and services. As a resultcurrency exchange rates. We are currently unable to determine the long term impact that Brexit will have on us, as any impact will depend, in part, on the outcome of our agent expansiontariff, trade, regulatory and retention efforts, commissions expense may increase.other negotiations.
For our Financial Paper Products segment, we expect the decline in overall paper-based transactions to continue primarily due to continued migration by customers to other payment methods. We also expect the underlying balances to remain stable or move commensurate with the transaction volume.
In February 2014, we announced the 2014 Global Transformation Program,Our investment revenue, which consists primarily of three key components: reorganizationinterest income generated through the investment of cash balances received from the sale of our Financial Paper Products, is dependent on the interest rate environment. The Company would see a positive impact on its investment revenue if interest rates continue to rise.
The TCJA, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017, makes significant changes to the taxation of U.S. business entities. These changes include a permanent reduction to the federal corporate income tax rate and restructuring, compliance enhancementchanges in the deductibility of interest on corporate debt obligations, among others. The Company continues to analyze the various components of the TCJA and a focusits impact on Digital/Self-Service revenue. Reorganization and restructuring activitiesour consolidated financial statements. As such, the provisional amounts recorded as of December 31, 2017 related to the 2014 Global Transformation Program are centered around facilitiesestimated impact resulting from the re-measurement of our deferred tax assets and headcount rationalization, system efficienciesliabilities and headcount right-shoringthe estimated charge for the one-time tax on our deferred foreign earnings could change. See "Income Taxes" section further below and outsourcing. The Company expects to complete these activities in early 2016. As a resultNote 12 — Income Taxes of the reorganizationNotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure.
We continue to see a trend among state, federal and restructuringinternational regulators toward enhanced scrutiny of anti-money laundering compliance programs, as well as consumer fraud prevention and education. Compliance with laws and regulations is a highly complex and integral part of our day-to-day operations; thus we have continued to increase our compliance personnel headcount and make investments in our compliance-related technology and infrastructure.For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company has invested $28.0 million in its compliance enhancement program, we estimate $25which includes $18.4 million of capital expenditures and $9.6 million of expenses incurred.
In the first quarter of 2013, a compliance monitor was selected pursuant to a requirement of our settlement with the MDPA and U.S. DOJ. We have received five annual pre-tax cost savings will be generated exiting fiscal year 2015.
reports from the compliance monitor and we continue to make investments in our compliance systems and operations as part of our compliance enhancement program. We anticipate making investmentsincurred $16.0 million of approximately $25.0 millionexpense directly related to the compliance enhancement program in 2016, compared to $48.9 million and $49.0 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively.
We believe that our investment in innovative products and services, particularly Digital/Self-Service solutions such as moneygram.com, mobile solutions, account deposit and kiosk-based services, positionsmonitor for the Company to enhance revenue growth and diversify our product offerings. Digital/Self-Service solutions represented 12 percent of money transfer revenue for 2015 and we are anticipating it to reach 15 percent to 20 percent by the end of 2017. For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Digital/Self-Service channel generated revenue of $150.1 million, $97.0 million and $71.6 million, respectively.2017.
Financial Measures and Key Metrics
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. ("GAAP") as well as certain non-GAAP financial measures that we use to assess our overall performance.
GAAP Measures — We utilize certain financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP to assess the Company's overall performance. These measures include, but are not limited to: fee and other revenue, fee and other commissions expense, fee and other revenue less commissions, operating income and operating margin. Due to our regulatory capital requirements, we deem certain payment service assets as settlement assets. Settlement assets represent funds received or to be received from agents for unsettled money transfers, money orders and customer payments. Settlement assets include settlement cash and cash equivalents, receivables, net, interest-bearing investments and available-for-sale investments. See Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure.
Non-GAAP Measures — Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes (or includes) amounts that are included in (or excluded from) the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP. We strongly encourage investors and stockholders to review our financial statements and publicly-filed reports in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure. While we believe that these metrics enhance investors' understanding of our business, these metrics are not necessarily
comparable with similarly named metrics of other companies. The following are non-GAAP financial measures we use to assess our overall performance:
EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, including agent signing bonus amortization)
Adjusted EBITDA (EBITDA adjusted for certain significant items) — Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our indebtedness or tax payments that may result in a reduction in cash available.
Adjusted Free Cash Flow (Adjusted EBITDA less cash interest, cash taxes, cash payments for capital expenditures and cash payments for agent signing bonuses) — Adjusted Free Cash Flow does not reflect cash payments related to the adjustment of certain significant items in Adjusted EBITDA.
Constant Currency — Constant currency metrics assume that amounts denominated in foreign currencies are translated to the U.S. dollar at rates consistent with those in the prior year.
The Company utilizes specific terms related to our business throughout this document, including the following:
Corridor — With regard to a money transfer transaction, the originating "send" location and the designated "receive" location are referred to as a corridor.
Corridor mix — The relative impact of increases or decreases in money transfer transaction volume in each corridor versus the comparative prior period.
Face value — The principal amount of each completed transaction, excluding any fees related to the transaction.
Foreign currency — The impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on our financial results is typically calculated as the difference between current period activity translated using the current period’s currency exchange rates and the comparable prior-year period’s currency exchange rates. We use this method to calculate the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on revenues, commissions and other operating expenses for all countries where the functional currency is not the U.S. dollar.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table is a summary of the results of operations for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions, except percentages) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 vs 2014 | | 2014 vs 2013 | | 2015 vs 2014 | | 2014 vs 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 vs 2016 | | 2016 vs 2015 | | 2017 vs 2016 | | 2016 vs 2015 |
| Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fee and other revenue | $ | 1,422.6 |
| | $ | 1,438.4 |
| | $ | 1,456.8 |
| | $ | (15.8 | ) | | $ | (18.4 | ) | | (1 | )% | | (1 | )% | $ | 1,560.9 |
| | $ | 1,612.4 |
| | $ | 1,527.0 |
| | $ | (51.5 | ) | | $ | 85.4 |
| | (3 | )% | | 6 | % |
| Investment revenue | 12.1 |
| | 16.5 |
| | 17.6 |
| | (4.4 | ) | | (1.1 | ) | | (27 | )% | | (6 | )% | 41.2 |
| | 18.0 |
| | 12.1 |
| | 23.2 |
| | 5.9 |
| | NM |
| | 49 | % |
| Total revenue | 1,434.7 |
| | 1,454.9 |
| | 1,474.4 |
| | (20.2 | ) | | (19.5 | ) | | (1 | )% | | (1 | )% | 1,602.1 |
| | 1,630.4 |
| | 1,539.1 |
| | (28.3 | ) | | 91.3 |
| | (2 | )% | | 6 | % |
| Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fee and other commissions expense | 655.4 |
| | 666.0 |
| | 677.8 |
| | (10.6 | ) | | (11.8 | ) | | (2 | )% | | (2 | )% | 763.5 |
| | 793.1 |
| | 759.8 |
| | (29.6 | ) | | 33.3 |
| | (4 | )% | | 4 | % |
| Investment commissions expense | 0.8 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.4 |
| | — |
| | 100 | % | | — | % | 8.7 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 6.2 |
| | 1.7 |
| | NM |
| | NM |
|
| Total commissions expense | 656.2 |
| | 666.4 |
| | 678.2 |
| | (10.2 | ) | | (11.8 | ) | | (2 | )% | | (2 | )% | 772.2 |
| | 795.6 |
| | 760.6 |
| | (23.4 | ) | | 35.0 |
| | (3 | )% | | 5 | % |
| Compensation and benefits | 309.1 |
| | 275.0 |
| | 264.9 |
| | 34.1 |
| | 10.1 |
| | 12 | % | | 4 | % | 277.7 |
| | 295.7 |
| | 310.4 |
| | (18.0 | ) | | (14.7 | ) | | (6 | )% | | (5 | )% |
| Transaction and operations support | 324.8 |
| | 332.2 |
| | 253.7 |
| | (7.4 | ) | | 78.5 |
| | (2 | )% | | 31 | % | 402.3 |
| | 309.5 |
| | 324.8 |
| | 92.8 |
| | (15.3 | ) | | 30 | % | | (5 | )% |
| Occupancy, equipment and supplies | 62.3 |
| | 54.4 |
| | 49.0 |
| | 7.9 |
| | 5.4 |
| | 15 | % | | 11 | % | 66.1 |
| | 61.9 |
| | 62.3 |
| | 4.2 |
| | (0.4 | ) | | 7 | % | | (1 | )% |
| Depreciation and amortization | 66.1 |
| | 55.5 |
| | 50.7 |
| | 10.6 |
| | 4.8 |
| | 19 | % | | 10 | % | 75.1 |
| | 79.9 |
| | 66.1 |
| | (4.8 | ) | | 13.8 |
| | (6 | )% | | 21 | % |
| Total operating expenses | 1,418.5 |
| | 1,383.5 |
| | 1,296.5 |
| | 35.0 |
| | 87.0 |
| | 3 | % | | 7 | % | 1,593.4 |
| | 1,542.6 |
| | 1,524.2 |
| | 50.8 |
| | 18.4 |
| | 3 | % | | 1 | % |
| Operating income | 16.2 |
| | 71.4 |
| | 177.9 |
| | (55.2 | ) | | (106.5 | ) | | (77 | )% | | (60 | )% | 8.7 |
| | 87.8 |
| | 14.9 |
| | (79.1 | ) | | 72.9 |
| | (90 | )% | | NM |
|
| Other expenses (income) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net securities gains | — |
| | (45.4 | ) | | — |
| | 45.4 |
| | (45.4 | ) | | NM |
| | (100 | )% | |
| Other expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Interest expense | 45.3 |
| | 44.2 |
| | 47.3 |
| | 1.1 |
| | (3.1 | ) | | 2 | % | | (7 | )% | 45.3 |
| | 45.0 |
| | 45.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| | (0.3 | ) | | 1 | % | | (1 | )% |
| Debt extinguishment costs | — |
| | — |
| | 45.3 |
| | — |
| | (45.3 | ) | | NM |
| | (100 | )% | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | (0.3 | ) | | 0.3 |
| | NM |
| | NM |
|
| Total other expenses (income), net | 45.3 |
| | (1.2 | ) | | 92.6 |
| | 46.5 |
| | (93.8 | ) | | NM |
| | (101 | )% | 45.3 |
| | 45.3 |
| | 45.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — | % | | — | % |
| (Loss) income before income taxes | (29.1 | ) | | 72.6 |
| | 85.3 |
| | (101.7 | ) | | (12.7 | ) | | NM |
| | (15 | )% | (36.6 | ) | | 42.5 |
| | (30.4 | ) | | (79.1 | ) | | 72.9 |
| | NM |
| | NM |
|
| Income tax expense | 47.8 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 32.9 |
| | 47.3 |
| | (32.4 | ) | | NM |
| | (98 | )% | |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | | (6.8 | ) | | 26.6 |
| | 47.3 |
| | (33.4 | ) | | (20.7 | ) | | NM |
| | (44 | )% |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (76.9 | ) | | $ | 72.1 |
| | $ | 52.4 |
| | $ | (149.0 | ) | | $ | 19.7 |
| | NM |
| | 38 | % | $ | (29.8 | ) | | $ | 15.9 |
| | $ | (77.7 | ) | | $ | (45.7 | ) | | $ | 93.6 |
| | NM |
| | NM |
|
NM = Not meaningful
Global Funds Transfer Fee and Other Revenue
Fee and other revenue consists of transaction fees, foreign exchange revenue and other revenue. The Company earns money transfer revenues primarily from consumer transaction fees on its money transfer and bill payment services and the management of currency exchange spreads involving different "send" and "receive" countries. Other revenue in the Global Funds Transfer segment primarily consists of breakage revenue on money transfer transactions where the likelihood of payment is remote and there is no requirement for remitting balances to government agencies under unclaimed property laws.
The following discussion provides a summary of fee and other revenue for the Global Funds Transfer segment for the years ended December 31. Investment revenue is not included in the analysis below. For further detail, see "Investment Revenue Analysis" below.
| | | (Amounts in millions, except percentages) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 vs 2014 | | 2014 vs 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 vs 2016 | | 2016 vs 2015 |
| Money transfer fee and other revenue | $ | 1,262.5 |
| | $ | 1,274.3 |
| | $ | 1,287.5 |
| | (1 | )% | | (1 | )% | $ | 1,421.8 |
| | $ | 1,456.2 |
| | $ | 1,366.9 |
| | (2 | )% | | 7 | % |
| Bill payment fee and other revenue | 98.7 |
| | 100.1 |
| | 102.0 |
| | (1 | )% | | (2 | )% | 86.3 |
| | 97.5 |
| | 98.7 |
| | (11 | )% | | (1 | )% |
| Global Funds Transfer fee and other revenue | $ | 1,361.2 |
| | $ | 1,374.4 |
| | $ | 1,389.5 |
| | (1 | )% | | (1 | )% | $ | 1,508.1 |
| | $ | 1,553.7 |
| | $ | 1,465.6 |
| | (3 | )% | | 6 | % |
| Fee and other commissions expense | $ | 655.1 |
| | $ | 665.4 |
| | $ | 676.9 |
| | (2 | )% | | (2 | )% | $ | 762.2 |
| | $ | 791.9 |
| | $ | 759.5 |
| | (4 | )% | | 4 | % |
Money Transfer Fee and Other Revenue
The following table details the changes in money transfer fee and other revenue from the respective prior year for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| For the period ended December 31 | $ | 1,274.3 |
| | $ | 1,287.5 |
| |
| Prior year ended | | $ | 1,456.2 |
| | $ | 1,366.9 |
|
| Change resulting from: | | | | | | |
| Corridor mix | | (41.1 | ) | | 24.2 |
|
| Money transfer volume | 83.2 |
| | 29.5 |
| 17.2 |
| | 74.1 |
|
| Average face value per transaction and pricing | | (15.5 | ) | | 11.1 |
|
| Impact from changes in exchange rates | (63.0 | ) | | (0.7 | ) | 1.7 |
| | (16.2 | ) |
| Average face value per transaction and pricing | (55.8 | ) | | (39.5 | ) | |
| Corridor mix | 22.8 |
| | (2.5 | ) | |
| Other | 1.0 |
| | — |
| 3.3 |
| | (3.9 | ) |
| For the period ended December 31 | $ | 1,262.5 |
| | $ | 1,274.3 |
| |
| Current year ended | | $ | 1,421.8 |
| | $ | 1,456.2 |
|
In 2015,2017, the declinedecrease in money transfer fee and other revenue was primarily driven by a negative change in corridor mix and a decrease in the strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared to the prior year, lower average face value per transaction and pricing, actions introduced in October 2014, partially offset by transaction growth of 7 percentincreased Non-U.S. and corridor mix. The transaction growth was driven by the continued growth in the U.S. Outbound and Non-U.S.outbound money transfer transactions, offset by the decline in our U.S. to U.S. money transfer transactions as detailedvolume discussed further below.
In 2014,2016, the declineincrease in money transfer fee and other revenue was primarily driven by the declineincreased Non-U.S. and U.S. outbound money transfer volume discussed further below and a positive change in our U.S. to U.S. business, lower average face value per transaction, pricing actions introduced in October 2014 and corridor mix, partially offset by transaction growth of 2 percent. the stronger U.S. dollar compared to prior year.
The low transaction growth was driven by the decline in our U.S. to U.S. business primarily due the introduction of the Walmart white labelfollowing table displays year-over-year money transfer service, which was offsetfee and other revenue growth by our continued growth ingeographic channel (the region originating the U.S. Outbound and Non-U.S money transfer transactions as detailed further below.transaction) for the years ended December 31:
|
| | | |
| | 2017 vs 2016 | | 2016 vs 2015 |
| Total money transfer fee and other revenue | (2)% | | 7% |
| U.S. Outbound | 1% | | 9% |
| Non-U.S. | (2)% | | 8% |
| U.S. to U.S. | (16)% | | (7)% |
Money Transfer Transactions
The following table displays the percentage distribution of total money transfer transactions by geographic locationchannel (the region originating the transaction) for the years ended December 31:
| | | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| U.S. to U.S. | 17 | % | | 23 | % | | 30 | % | |
| U.S. Outbound | 43 | % | | 40 | % | | 36 | % | 44 | % | | 43 | % | | 43 | % |
| Non-U.S. | 40 | % | | 37 | % | | 34 | % | 44 | % | | 43 | % | | 40 | % |
| U.S. to U.S. | | 12 | % | | 14 | % | | 17 | % |
The following table displays year over year money transfer transaction growth by geographic locationchannel (the region originating the transaction) for the years ended December 31:
| | | | 2015 vs 2014 | | 2014 vs 2013 | 2017 vs 2016 | | 2016 vs 2015 |
| Total transactions | 7 | % | | 2 | % | 1% | | 5% |
| U.S. to U.S. | (18 | )% | | (22 | )% | |
| U.S. Outbound | 12 | % | | 15 | % | 2% | | 8% |
| Non-U.S. | 16 | % | | 10 | % | 6% | | 11% |
| U.S. to U.S. | | (14)% | | (13)% |
In 2015,During 2017, total money transfer fee and other revenue declined by 2% and total money transfer transactions grew by 1%. The U.S. Outbound channel generated 1% revenue growth for the Non-U.S. corridors generated 16 percentyear ended December 31, 2017 and 2% transaction growth for the same period. The revenue and transaction growth was primarily driven by sends to Latin America. The U.S. Outbound channel accounted for 40 percent44% of our total money transfer transactions.transactions for 2017.
During 2017, money transfer fee for the Non-U.S. channel and other revenue declined by 2% and transactions grew by 6% for the same period. The transaction growth was primarily driven by thesends from Latin America, Middle East Westernand Europe partially offset by a decrease in revenue caused by geopolitical and Latin America regions. U.S. Outbound corridors generated 12 percent transaction growth while accountingeconomic challenges in parts of Africa. The Non-U.S. channel accounted for 43 percent44% of our total money transfer transactions. The success intransactions for the year ended December 31, 2017.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, the U.S. to U.S. channel money transfer fee and other revenue declined by 16% and transactions declined by 14% for the same period. The decline was primarily due to lower transaction volume. The U.S. to U.S. channel accounted for 12% of total money transfer transactions for 2017.
During 2016, total money transfer fee and other revenue grew by 7% and total money transfer transactions grew by 5%. The U.S. Outbound corridorchannel generated 9% revenue growth for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 8% transaction growth for the same period. The revenue and transaction growth was primarily driven by sends to Latin America, Africa and to Africa.Asia Pacific and was partially offset by the discontinuation of our full-service kiosk offerings. The U.S. to U.S. corridor declined 18 percent andOutbound channel accounted for 17 percent43% of our total money transfer transactions. The decline was primarily driven by a 40 percent decline in Walmart U.S. to U.S. transactions partially offset by 8 percent growth in U.S. to U.S. transactions excluding Walmart.for 2016.
In 2014,During 2016, the U.S. Outbound corridors generated 15 percent transaction growth and accounted for 40 percent of totalNon-U.S. channel money transfer transactions.fee and other revenue grew by 8% and transactions grew by 11% for the same period. The success in the U.S. Outbound corridorrevenue and transaction growth was primarily driven by sends to Latin America, which hadfrom Europe, partially offset by lower transaction growthvolume caused by geopolitical and economic challenges in parts of 16 percent for 2014, as well as sends to Africa and Asia Pacific.Africa. The Non-U.S. transactionschannel accounted for 37 percent43% of total money transfer transactions for the year ended December 31, 2016.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the U.S. to U.S. channel money transfer fee and generated 10 percent transaction growth.other revenue declined by 7% and transactions declined by 13% for the same period. The growthdecline was primarily driven by the Middle East, Asia Pacific and Latin America.due to lower volume of transactions under $200. The U.S. to U.S. corridor declined 22 percent andchannel accounted for 23 percent14% of total money transfer transactions. The decline was primarily driven by a 37 percent decline in Walmart U.S. to U.S. transactions partially offset by 10 percent growth in U.S. to U.S. transactions excluding Walmart.for 2016.
Bill Payment Fee and Other Revenue
In 20152017 and 2014,2016, bill payment fee and other revenue decreased $1.4by $11.2 million or 1 percent11% and $1.9$1.2 million or 2 percent,1%, respectively, as a result ofdue to lower average feestransactions resulting from shifts in industry mix, partially offsetmix. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, bill payment transactions decreased by transaction growth of 1 percent in 201512% and 2014. The impact of changes in industry mix reflects our continued growth in new emerging verticals that generate a lower fee per transaction than our traditional verticals.3%, respectively.
Global Funds Transfer Fee and Other Commissions Expense
The Company incurs fee commissions and foreign exchange commissions primarily on our Global Funds Transfer products. In a money transfer transaction, both the agent initiating the transaction and the receiving agent earn a fee commission that is generally a fixed fee or is based on a percentage of the fee charged to the consumer. The agent initiating the transaction and the receiving agent also earn foreign exchange commissions, which are generally based on a percentage of currency exchange spreads. In a bill payment transaction, the agent initiating the transaction receives a commission and, in limited circumstances, the biller will generally earn a commission that is based on a percentage of the fee charged to the consumer. Other commissions expense includes the amortization of capitalized agent signing bonus payments.
The following table details the changes in fee and other commissions for the Global Funds Transfer segment from the respective prior year for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| For the period ended December 31: | $ | 665.4 |
| | $ | 676.9 |
| |
| Prior year ended | | $ | 791.9 |
| | $ | 759.5 |
|
| Change resulting from: | | | | | | |
| Impact from changes in exchange rates | (29.4 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | |
| Money transfer revenue | 22.9 |
| | (5.8 | ) | (17.4 | ) | | 50.9 |
|
| Bill payment revenue and commission rates | | (6.6 | ) | | (0.1 | ) |
| Money transfer corridor and agent mix | (12.6 | ) | | (14.2 | ) | (3.7 | ) | | (5.0 | ) |
| Signing bonuses | 10.8 |
| | 10.7 |
| (1.9 | ) | | (5.0 | ) |
| Bill payment revenue and commission rates | (2.0 | ) | | — |
| |
| For the period ended December 31: | $ | 655.1 |
| | $ | 665.4 |
| |
| Impact from changes in exchange rates | | (0.1 | ) | | (8.4 | ) |
| Current year ended | | $ | 762.2 |
| | $ | 791.9 |
|
In 2015,For the Global Funds Transferyear ended December 31, 2017, fee and other commissions expense decreased $10.3$29.7 million or 2 percent.4%. The decrease in commissions expense was primarily driven by the strengthening of the U.S. dollardecreases in money transfer revenue, bill payment revenue and changes in thecommissions rates and money transfer corridor and agent mix. Commissions expense as a percentage of fee and other revenue was 51% in both 2017 and 2016.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, fee and other commissions expense increased $32.4 million or 4%. The declineincrease in commissions expense was partially offsetprimarily driven by increasedthe increase in money transfer revenue, as a result of an increase in money transfer volume and an increase in average price per transaction, partially offset by changes in money transfer corridor and agent mix, the impact from a declinestronger U.S. dollar compared to prior year and a decrease in average face value per transaction and pricing previously discussed above, as well as signing bonus amortization from our agent expansion and retention efforts.amortization. Commissions expense as a percentage of fee and other revenue slightly declined to 48.1 percent51% in 20152016 from 48.4 percent52% in 2014 due to a change in agent mix.
In 2014, the Global Funds Transfer commissions expense decreased $11.5 million or 2 percent. The decrease in commissions expense was primarily driven by changes in the corridor and agent mix and the movement in foreign currency exchange rates, partially offset by increased signing bonus amortization from our agent expansion and retention efforts. Commissions expense as a percentage of fee and other revenue remained relatively stable at 48.4 percent and 48.7 percent, in 2014 and 2013, respectively.2015.
Financial Paper Products Fee and Other Revenue and Fee and Other Commissions Expense
Fee and other revenue consists of transaction fees foreign exchange revenue and other revenue. Transaction fees are earned on money order and official check transactions. Other revenue primarily consists of processing fees, on rebate checks and controlled disbursements, service charges on aged outstanding money orders and money order dispenser fees. We generally do not pay commissions to agents on the sale of money orders, except, in certain limited circumstances, for large agents where we may pay a fixed commission based on total money order transactions.transactions or outstanding balance.
The following discussion provides a summary of fee and other revenue and fee and other commissions expense for the Financial Paper Product segment for the years ended December 31. Investment revenue and investment commissions expense are not included in the analysis below. For further detail, see "Investment Revenue Analysis" below.
| | | (Amounts in millions, except percentages) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 vs 2014 | | 2014 vs 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 vs 2016 | | 2016 vs 2015 |
| Money order fee and other revenue | $ | 47.6 |
| | $ | 49.3 |
| | $ | 51.1 |
| | (3 | )% | | (4 | )% | $ | 42.5 |
| | $ | 45.4 |
| | $ | 47.6 |
| | (6 | )% | | (5 | )% |
| Official check fee and other revenue | 13.8 |
| | 14.7 |
| | 16.2 |
| | (6 | )% | | (9 | )% | 10.4 |
| | 12.2 |
| | 13.8 |
| | (15 | )% | | (12 | )% |
| Financial Paper Product fee and other revenue | $ | 61.4 |
| | $ | 64.0 |
| | $ | 67.3 |
| | (4 | )% | | (5 | )% | $ | 52.9 |
| | $ | 57.6 |
| | $ | 61.4 |
| | (8 | )% | | (6 | )% |
| Fee and other commissions expense | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 0.9 |
| | (50 | )% | | (33 | )% | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| | 8 | % | | NM |
|
Money order fee and other revenue decreased in 20152017 and 20142016 due to transaction declines of 5 percent6% and 6 percent,7%, respectively, attributed primarily to the migration byof consumers to other payment methods. Similarly, official check fee and other revenue decreased 6 percentdue to transaction declines of 3% and 9 percent8% in 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively. Fee and other commissions expense decreased by 50 percent and 33 percent in 2015 and 2014, respectively, due primarily to volume declines and change in agent mix.
Investment Revenue Analysis
The following discussion provides a summary of the Company's investment revenue and investment commissions expense for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions, except percentages) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 vs 2014 | | 2014 vs 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 vs 2016 | | 2016 vs 2015 |
| Investment revenue | $ | 12.1 |
| | $ | 16.5 |
| | $ | 17.6 |
| | (27 | )% | | (6 | )% | $ | 41.2 |
| | $ | 18.0 |
| | $ | 12.1 |
| | NM | | 49 | % |
Investment commissions expense (1) | 0.8 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 100 | % | | — | % | 8.7 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 0.8 |
| | NM | | NM |
|
(1)Commissions are generated fromInvestment commissions expense consists of amounts paid to financial institution customers based on short-term interest rate indices times the average outstanding cash balances of official checks sold.sold by the financial institution.
Investment Revenue
Investment revenue consists primarily of interest income generated through the investment of cash balances received from the sale of official checks and money orders. These cash balances are available to us for investment until the payment instrument is cleared. Investment revenue varies depending on the level of investment balances and the yield on our investments.
Investment revenue in 2015 decreased $4.42017 increased $23.2 million, or 27 percent, when compared to 2014 primarily2016, due to the one-time returnsredemption of an asset-backed security as well as higher yields earned on legacy investmentsinvestment balances. In 2017, investment commissions expense increased due to the change in 2014.interest rates. See Note 4 — Investment Portfolio of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the redemption.
Investment revenue in 2014 decreased $1.12016 increased $5.9 million, or 6 percent,49%, when compared to 20132015 primarily due to lower average outstandinghigher yields earned on investment balances as well as lowerbalances. In 2016 investment commissions expense increased due to the change in interest rates.
Operating Expenses
The following table is a summary of the operating expenses, excluding commissions expense, for the years ended December 31:
| | | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| (Amounts in millions, except percentages) | Dollars | | Percent of Total Revenue | | Dollars | | Percent of Total Revenue | | Dollars | | Percent of Total Revenue | Dollars | | Percent of Total Revenue | | Dollars | | Percent of Total Revenue | | Dollars | | Percent of Total Revenue |
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 309.1 |
| | 21 | % | | $ | 275.0 |
| | 19 | % | | $ | 264.9 |
| | 18 | % | $ | 277.7 |
| | 17 | % | | $ | 295.7 |
| | 18 | % | | $ | 310.4 |
| | 20 | % |
| Transaction and operations support | 324.8 |
| | 23 | % | | 332.2 |
| | 23 | % | | 253.7 |
| | 17 | % | 402.3 |
| | 25 | % | | 309.5 |
| | 19 | % | | 324.8 |
| | 21 | % |
| Occupancy, equipment and supplies | 62.3 |
| | 4 | % | | 54.4 |
| | 3 | % | | 49.0 |
| | 3 | % | 66.1 |
| | 4 | % | | 61.9 |
| | 4 | % | | 62.3 |
| | 4 | % |
| Depreciation and amortization | 66.1 |
| | 5 | % | | 55.5 |
| | 4 | % | | 50.7 |
| | 4 | % | 75.1 |
| | 5 | % | | 79.9 |
| | 5 | % | | 66.1 |
| | 4 | % |
| Total operating expenses | $ | 762.3 |
| | 53 | % | | $ | 717.1 |
| | 49 | % | | $ | 618.3 |
| | 42 | % | $ | 821.2 |
| | 51 | % | | $ | 747.0 |
| | 46 | % | | $ | 763.6 |
| | 50 | % |
In 2015,2017, total operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue increased when compared to 2016, due to an $85.0 million accrual related to the DPA.
In 2016, total operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue was 53 percent,46% compared to 49 percent50% in 2014.2015. The increasedecrease was primarilymainly due to increased expenses incurred as a result of the 2015 performance bonus plan and pension settlement charges related to the voluntary pension buyout included in "Compensation and benefits" as well as the declinean increase in total revenue. In 2014, total operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue, was 49 percent, which was an increase from 42 percent in 2013, primarily duelower expense related to the 2014 Global Transformation Program.
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits include salaries and benefits, management incentive programs, related payroll taxes and other employee related costs. The following table is a summary of the change in compensation and benefits from the respective prior year for the years ended December 31:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 |
| For the period ended December 31 | $ | 275.0 |
| | $ | 264.9 |
|
| Change resulting from: | | | |
| Salaries, related payroll taxes and incentive compensation | 35.9 |
| | (9.0 | ) |
| Impact from changes in exchange rates | (18.8 | ) | | (0.1 | ) |
| Employee stock-based compensation | 14.2 |
| | (5.8 | ) |
| Pension settlement charges | 14.0 |
| | — |
|
| Reorganization and restructuring | (9.1 | ) | | 18.5 |
|
| Compliance enhancement program | (1.5 | ) | | 2.8 |
|
| Other employee benefits | (0.6 | ) | | 3.7 |
|
| For the period ended December 31 | $ | 309.1 |
| | $ | 275.0 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Prior year ended | $ | 295.7 |
| | $ | 310.4 |
|
| Change resulting from: | | | |
| | | | |
| Net salaries, related payroll taxes and cash incentive compensation | (11.7 | ) | | 12.7 |
|
| Severance and related costs | (6.0 | ) | | 7.0 |
|
| Employee stock-based compensation | (3.4 | ) | | (1.7 | ) |
| Impact from changes in exchange rates | 2.3 |
| | (2.1 | ) |
| Pension | (1.3 | ) | | (19.7 | ) |
| Reorganization and restructuring | — |
| | (10.3 | ) |
| Other | 2.1 |
| | (0.6 | ) |
| Current year ended | $ | 277.7 |
| | $ | 295.7 |
|
In 2015,2017, compensation and benefits expense increased partiallydecreased by $18.0 million due to an increasethe decrease in net salaries, related payroll taxes and cash incentive compensation mainly due to an increaseprimarily driven by lower headcount, a decrease in expensesseverance and related to performance bonus plan in 2015 compared to 2014. The increase is also attributed to an increase incosts and lower employee stock-based compensation due to the reversal of performance-based restricted stock units in 2014 and settlement charges from the voluntary pension buyout.expense. These increasesdecreases were partially offset by the impactchanges in exchange rates due to a weaker U.S. dollar.
In 2016, compensation and benefits decreased by $14.7 million due to the decrease in pension expense primarily as a result of a pension settlement charge recorded in 2015 from a voluntary pension buyout, the strengthening U.S. dollar and the wind downconclusion of the 2014 Global Transformation Program reorganization and restructuring activities.
In 2014, compensation and benefits expense increased primarilyactivities, impact from changes in exchange rates due to the 2014 Global Transformation Program, including increased costs relating to our reorganizationa stronger U.S. dollar and restructuring activities and our compliance enhancement program. The increase in costs related to the 2014 Global Transformation Program was $22.6 million,lower employee stock-based compensation expense. These decreases were partially offset by expenses of $1.3 million related to the 2010 Global Transformation Initiative that concludedan increase in 2013. The costs related to the 2014 Global Transformation Program primarily consisted of severance costs related to reorganization and restructuring activities and increased headcount for the compliance enhancement program. Salaries andnet salaries, related payroll taxes increased due to increasedand cash incentive compensation primarily driven by higher headcount ordinary salary increases and changing employee base as we invested in our sales, market development and compliance functions. Thealso offset by an increase in compensationseverance and benefits expense was slightly offset by decreased stock-based compensation and performance incentives.related costs.
Transaction and Operations Support
Transaction and operations support primarily includes marketing, professional fees and other outside services, telecommunications, agent support costs, including forms related to our products, non-compensation employee costs, including training, travel and relocation costs, bank charges and the impact of foreign exchange rate movements on our monetary transactions, assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar.
The following table is a summary of the change in transaction and operations support from the respective prior year for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| For the period ended December 31 | $ | 332.2 |
| | $ | 253.7 |
| |
| Prior year ended | | $ | 309.5 |
| | $ | 324.8 |
|
| Change resulting from: | | | | | | |
| Legal expenses | | 94.2 |
| | (2.2 | ) |
| Net realized foreign exchange gains | | 10.7 |
| | (6.8 | ) |
| Outsourcing, independent contractor and consultant costs | 19.9 |
| | 19.3 |
| (9.2 | ) | | 19.2 |
|
| Realized foreign exchange gains | (12.1 | ) | | (0.9 | ) | |
| Marketing costs | | (8.4 | ) | | 5.8 |
|
| Direct monitor costs | | 6.9 |
| | (2.4 | ) |
| Provision for loss | | (4.9 | ) | | (8.1 | ) |
| Bank Charges | | 4.2 |
| | 2.1 |
|
| Compliance enhancement program | | (2.1 | ) | | (13.0 | ) |
| Impact from changes in exchange rates | (11.7 | ) | | — |
| 1.0 |
| | (1.0 | ) |
| Legal expenses | (9.9 | ) | | 13.4 |
| |
| Non-income taxes | (8.5 | ) | | 5.0 |
| |
| Provision for loss | 6.6 |
| | 6.6 |
| |
| Reorganization and restructuring | | — |
| | (7.8 | ) |
| Other | 5.2 |
| | (1.8 | ) | 0.4 |
| | (1.1 | ) |
| Direct monitor costs | 5.0 |
| | 0.4 |
| |
| Reorganization and restructuring | (2.1 | ) | | 9.3 |
| |
| Marketing costs | 0.4 |
| | 7.3 |
| |
| Compliance enhancement program | (0.2 | ) | | 19.9 |
| |
| For the period ended December 31 | $ | 324.8 |
| | $ | 332.2 |
| |
| Current year ended | | $ | 402.3 |
| | $ | 309.5 |
|
In 2015,2017, transaction and operations support expense decreasedincreased by $92.8 million primarily due to an increase in legal expenses driven by the $85.0 million accrual related to the DPA discussed in more detail in Note 13 — Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and costs incurred in connection with the terminated merger with Ant Financial. Additional factors contributing to the increase include: the change in net realized foreign exchange gains, the impact of the strengthening U.S. dollar,direct monitor costs and bank charges from fees on foreign exchange trades. The increase was partially offset by decreases in outsourcing, independent contractor and consultant costs and marketing costs and a decreasereduction in legal expensesour provision for loss.
In 2016, transaction and operations support decreased by $15.3 million primarily due to the State Civil Investigative Demands matter which was substantially accrued fordecline in 2014expenses related to the compliance enhancement program and the wind downcompletion of the 2014 Global Transformation Program reorganization and restructuring activities. These decreases wereactivities, a reduction in our provision for loss due to reduced moneygram.com fraud losses and decreased net realized foreign exchange gains related to the favorable execution of the purchase of certain currencies, which traded outside of their historical norms in the first half of 2016. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in costs for outsourcing, independent contractor and consultingconsultant costs as a result of continued investment in our compliance systems and operations as well as increased call volume due to initiatives under the compliance enhancement programcenters and an increase in our provision for loss due to our new instant ACH product. Additionally, direct monitor costs increased due to remediation efforts related to the DPA.
In 2014, transaction and operations support expense increased primarily as a result of the expenses associated with the 2014 Global Transformation Program, which includes costs related to our reorganization and restructuring activities and our compliance enhancement program. The increase in costs for the 2014 Global Transformation Program was $32.6 million, partially offset by a decrease in expenses of $3.4 million associated with the 2010 Global Transformation Initiative which concluded in 2013. Expenses related to the compliance enhancement program increased $19.9 million as we continue to implement compliance enhancement tools and processes. Additionally, we incurred increased expenses for outsourcing due to the shift from internal employees to outsourced vendors as part of the 2014 Global Transformation Program. Capital transaction costs are related to the underwritten secondary public offering and share repurchase which were completed on April 2, 2014. We incurred increased marketing costs due to the launch of our new low U.S. to U.S. pricing. Legal expenses increased primarily due to the $11.0 million accrual associated with the State Civil Investigative Demands matter. Increased expenditures related to telecommunication costs are a result of continued network, product and infrastructure growth. The increase in the provision for loss consists of amounts related to the closure of two agents during 2014.costs.
Occupancy, Equipment and Supplies
Occupancy, equipment and supplies expense include facilities rent and maintenance costs, software and equipment maintenance costs, freight and delivery costs and supplies.
In 2015,2017, occupancy, equipment and supplies expense increased $7.9$4.2 million or 15 percent, when compared to 2014, primarily due to2016 as a result of an increase in equipment maintenance charges on new licenses and other software projects, including those relating to the compliance enhancement program. These increases were partially offset by the impact of the strengthening U.S. dollar.costs.
In 2014,2016, occupancy, equipment and supplies increased $5.4 million, or 11 percent,remained relatively flat when compared to 2013, as a result of increased rent and building operation costs, equipment maintenance and compliance enhancement costs associated with the 2014 Global Transformation Program.2015.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation on computer hardware and software, agent signage, point of sale equipment, capitalized software development costs, office furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements and amortization of intangible assets.
In 2015,2017, depreciation and amortization decreased $4.8 million, or 6%, when compared to 2016, as a result of higher costs during the first half of 2016 from the accelerated depreciation expense on our non-core point of sale equipment that was early retired.
In 2016, depreciation and amortization increased $10.6$13.8 million, or 19 percent,21%, when compared to 2014,2015, primarily driven by higheraccelerated depreciation expense due toon non-core assets and depreciation expense on computer hardware and software asset additions related to the compliance enhancement program.
In 2014, depreciation and amortization increased $4.8 million, or 10 percent,Other Expenses, Net
Interest expense in 2017 remained relatively flat when compared to 2013, primarily driven by higher amortization expense for acquired assets and depreciation expense for computer hardware.2016.
Other Expenses (Income), Net
The following table is a summary of the components of other expenses (income), net for the years ended December 31:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 vs 2014 | | 2014 vs 2013 |
| Interest expense | $ | 45.3 |
| | $ | 44.2 |
| | $ | 47.3 |
| | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | (3.1 | ) |
| Net securities gains | — |
| | (45.4 | ) | | — |
| | 45.4 |
| | (45.4 | ) |
| Debt extinguishment costs | — |
| | — |
| | 45.3 |
| | — |
| | (45.3 | ) |
| Total other expenses (income), net | $ | 45.3 |
| | $ | (1.2 | ) | | $ | 92.6 |
| | $ | 46.5 |
| | $ | (93.8 | ) |
Interest Expense— Interest expense in 2015 increased $1.1 million or 2 percent from 2014 as a result of higher average debt balances2016 remained relatively flat when compared to 2015. The Company incurred in connection with the Incremental Agreement, dated April 2, 2014. Interest expense decreased $3.1 million from $47.3 million in 2013 to $44.2 million in 2014 as a result of lower interest rates from the 2013 Credit Agreement and the Company's purchase of all $325.0 million of its outstanding second lien notes in 2013 (the "Note Repurchase"), partially offset by higher average debt balances incurred in connection with the Incremental Agreement. See Note 9 —Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Net Securities Gains — During 2015 and 2013, we did not realize any net securities gains or losses. In 2014, we realized $45.4 million of net securities gains for settlements related to certain securities previously written down to a nominal fair value. See Note 14 — Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure.
Debt Extinguishment Costs — During 2015 and 2014, we did not incur any debt extinguishment costs. In connection with the termination of the Credit Agreement, dated May 18, 2011, and the Note Repurchase, we recognized debt extinguishment costs of $45.3$0.3 million in 2016 in connection with additional debt principal payments and a debt repurchase made during the first quarter of 2013. See Note 9 — Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure.year.
Income Taxes
The following table represents our provision for income taxes and effective tax rate for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions, except percentages) | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Provision for income taxes | | $ | 47.8 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | 32.9 |
| | $ | (6.8 | ) | | $ | 26.6 |
| | $ | 47.3 |
|
| Effective tax rate | | (164.3 | )% | | 0.6 | % | | 38.6 | % | | 18.6 | % | | 62.6 | % | | (155.6 | )% |
In 2017, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $6.8 million on a pre-tax loss of $36.6 million. The most significant items impacting the effective tax rate were the tax impacts of TCJA, discussed below, and the tax impact of an accrual related to the DPA as further discussed in Note 13 — Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result of the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% under the TCJA, the Company revalued its ending net deferred tax liabilities as of December 31, 2017 and recognized a provisional $19.8 million tax benefit in the Company’s consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2017. Additionally, the Company recognized a provisional net $3.0 million tax benefit for the remeasurement of previously recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities primarily associated with historical earnings in its foreign subsidiaries. See Note 12 — Income Taxes of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure regarding potential impacts from the TCJA and the other items impacting the Company's effective tax rate.
Our provision for income taxes increaseddecreased from 20142015 to 2015,2016, primarily as a result of thean IRS tax court decision relatedreceived in 2015 partially offset by a separate IRS settlement in 2016. The effective tax rate increase in 2016 is not meaningful to an IRS matter. As a result ofcompare to 2015 due to the operating loss in 2015, the effective tax rate was (164.3) percent.2015. See Note 1312 — Income Taxes and Note 1413 — Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure.
Our provision for income taxes and effective tax rate decreased from 2013 to 2014, primarily resulting from the re-measurement of uncertain tax positions initially recorded in 2012, as well as a release of the valuation allowance on capital loss carryovers from net securities gains, which were partially offset by the reversal of deferred tax benefits on canceled stock options.
Our provision for income taxes is volatile and could be affected by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes in tax laws and regulations, ultimate settlements of the IRS matter referred to above and examinations by tax authorities. Historically,We continue to examine the Company has not asserted permanent reinvestment with respect to its foreign undistributed earnings. Toimpact the extent such assertion changes in the future,TCJA may have on us, which could adversely affect our provision for income taxesbusiness, financial condition and effective tax rate may also change.results of operations.
We are regularly examined by tax authorities both domestically and internationally. We assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes and believe that adequate amounts have been reserved for adjustments that may result from these examinations. Given the inherent uncertainties in these examinations, the ultimate amount and timing of adjustments cannot be assured.
Operating Income and Operating Margin
The Company's management utilizes operating income and operating margin when assessing both consolidated and segment operating performance and allocation of resources. Excluded from the segments' operating income are certain pension and benefit obligation expenses, director deferred compensation plan expenses, executive severance and related costs and certain legal and corporate costs not related to the performance of our segments.
The following table provides a summary overview of operating income and operating margin for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions, except percentages) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Operating income: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Global Funds Transfer | $ | 31.7 |
| | $ | 75.4 |
| | $ | 162.6 |
| $ | 4.9 |
| | $ | 95.8 |
| | $ | 31.7 |
|
| Financial Paper Products | 17.9 |
| | 28.1 |
| | 30.9 |
| 31.8 |
| | 18.5 |
| | 17.9 |
|
| Total segment operating income | 49.6 |
| | 103.5 |
| | 193.5 |
| 36.7 |
| | 114.3 |
| | 49.6 |
|
| Other | (33.4 | ) | | (32.1 | ) | | (15.6 | ) | (28.0 | ) | | (26.5 | ) | | (34.7 | ) |
| Total operating income | $ | 16.2 |
| | $ | 71.4 |
| | $ | 177.9 |
| $ | 8.7 |
| | $ | 87.8 |
| | $ | 14.9 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total operating margin | 1.1 | % | | 4.9 | % | | 12.1 | % | 0.5 | % | | 5.4 | % | | 1.0 | % |
| Global Funds Transfer | 2.3 | % | | 5.5 | % | | 11.7 | % | 0.3 | % | | 6.2 | % | | 2.2 | % |
| Financial Paper Products | 24.4 | % | | 35.0 | % | | 36.8 | % | 33.8 | % | | 24.5 | % | | 24.4 | % |
| | | | | | | |
| Total Revenue | $ | 1,434.7 |
| | $ | 1,454.9 |
| | $ | 1,474.4 |
| |
| Global Funds Transfer | $ | 1,361.4 |
| | $ | 1,374.6 |
| | $ | 1,389.8 |
| |
| Financial Paper Products | $ | 73.3 |
| | $ | 80.3 |
| | $ | 84.0 |
| |
20152017 Compared to 20142016
During 2015,In 2017, the change in "Other" operating income was nominal. “Other” expenses included $5.2 million of legal expenses, Pension and Postretirement Benefits net periodic benefit expense of $25.7 million and other net corporate costs of $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.
In 2015, the Company experienced a decline in both totalGlobal Funds Transfer segment operating income and total operating margin primarily as a result of a $20.2 million decrease in total revenue driven bydecreased due to the decreasedecline in money transfer fee and other revenue and the increase in compensation and benefits expensean $85.0 million accrual related to the $14.0 million pension settlement chargesDPA discussed in more detail in Note 13 — Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, partially offset by the decrease in operating expenses as a result of various cost saving initiatives throughout the year. The Financial Paper Products segment operating income and operating margin increased when compared to 2016, due to higher segment revenues from the redemption of an asset-backed security described in Note 4 — Investment Portfolio of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The increase in incentive compensation.
2014 Compared to 2013
“Other” expenses in 2014 included $16.4 million of legal expenses related to the State Civil Investigative Demands accrual, expenses"Other" operating losses was primarily driven by costs incurred in connection with the IRS tax litigation and other matters, as well as Pension and Postretirement Benefits net periodic benefit expense of $10.2 million and other net corporate costs of $5.5 million. “Other” expensesterminated merger with Ant Financial in 2013 included $2.5 million of legal expenses in connection with the settlement related to the MDPA/U.S. DOJ investigation and the shareholder litigation, $1.5 million of2017, partially offset by lower severance and related costs from executive terminations as well as other net corporate costs of $11.6 million not allocatedcosts.
2016 Compared to the segments.2015
In 2014,During 2016, the Company experienced a declinean increase in both total operating income and total operating margin when compared to 2013, as2015, primarily due to increase in money transfer fee and other revenue of $89.3 million. Additionally, total operating income decreased to$71.4 million from $177.9 million in 2013, primarilyexpenses as a resultpercent of a $19.5 million decrease in total revenue and increaseddecreased due to the lower expenses related to the 2014 Global Transformation Program. TheProgram and the reduction in pension expense, partially offset by an increase in 2014 Global Transformation Program expenses wasoutsourcing, independent contractor and consultant costs, depreciation and amortization and net salaries, related payroll taxes and cash incentive compensation, as previously discussed.
"Other" operating losses decreased from 2015 to 2016 primarily driven bydue to the decrease in pension expense as a $23.9 million increaseresult of a pension settlement charge recorded in compliance enhancement program costs and2015 from a $27.3 million increase in reorganization and restructuring costs.voluntary pension buyout.
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”),EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Free Cash Flow and Constant Currency
We believe that EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, including agent signing bonus amortization), Adjusted EBITDA (EBITDA adjusted for certain significant items), Adjusted Free Cash Flow (Adjusted EBITDA less cash interest, cash taxes, cash payments for capital expenditures and cash payments for agent signing bonuses) and constant currency measures (which assume that amounts denominated in foreign currencies are translated to the U.S. dollar at rates consistent with those in the prior year) provide useful information to investors because they are indicators of the strength and performance of our ongoing business operations. These calculations are commonly used as a basis for investors, analysts and other interested parties to evaluate and compare the operating performance and value of companies within our industry. In addition, our debt agreements require compliance with financial measures similar to Adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Free Cash Flow and constant currency are financial and performance measures used by management in reviewing results of operations, forecasting, allocating resources and establishing employee incentive programs. We also present Adjusted EBITDA growth, constant currency adjusted, which provides information to investors regarding MoneyGram's performance without the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations year over year.year-over-year.
Although we believe that EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Free Cash Flow and constant currency measures enhance investors' understanding of our business and performance, these non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for the accompanying GAAP financial measures. These metrics are not necessarily comparable with similarly named metrics of other companies.
The following table is a reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures to the related GAAP financial measures for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| (Loss) income before income taxes | | $ | (29.1 | ) | | $ | 72.6 |
| | $ | 85.3 |
| | $ | (36.6 | ) | | $ | 42.5 |
| | $ | (30.4 | ) |
| Interest expense | | 45.3 |
| | 44.2 |
| | 47.3 |
| | 45.3 |
| | 45.0 |
| | 45.3 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | 66.1 |
| | 55.5 |
| | 50.7 |
| | 75.1 |
| | 79.9 |
| | 66.1 |
|
| Amortization of agent signing bonuses | | 60.4 |
| | 53.8 |
| | 42.8 |
| | 51.9 |
| | 54.0 |
| | 60.4 |
|
| EBITDA | | 142.7 |
| | 226.1 |
| | 226.1 |
| | 135.7 |
| | 221.4 |
| | 141.4 |
|
| Significant items impacting EBITDA: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock-based and contingent performance compensation (1) | | 26.9 |
| | 6.9 |
| | 14.1 |
| |
Legal and contingent matters(1) | | | 85.9 |
| | 2.3 |
| | 1.7 |
|
| Direct monitor costs | | | 16.0 |
| | 9.1 |
| | 11.5 |
|
| Stock-based, contingent and incentive compensation | | | 14.5 |
| | 19.0 |
| | 26.9 |
|
Costs incurred in connection with the terminated merger with Ant Financial(2) | | | 12.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Compliance enhancement program | | 26.5 |
| | 26.7 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 9.6 |
| | 10.3 |
| | 26.5 |
|
Severance and related costs
| | | 1.5 |
| | 1.9 |
| | — |
|
| Reorganization and restructuring costs | | 20.0 |
| | 30.5 |
| | 3.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 20.0 |
|
Pension settlement charge (2) | | 13.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Direct monitor costs | | 11.5 |
| | 6.5 |
| | — |
| |
Legal and contingent matters (3) | | 1.7 |
| | 16.4 |
| | 2.5 |
| |
| Net securities gains | | — |
| | (45.4 | ) | | — |
| |
| Losses related to agent closures | | — |
| | 7.4 |
| | — |
| |
Capital transaction costs (4) | | — |
| | 2.1 |
| | — |
| |
Debt extinguishment (5) | | — |
| | — |
| | 45.3 |
| |
| Severance and related costs | | — |
| | — |
| | 1.5 |
| |
Pension settlement charge | | | — |
| | — |
| | 13.8 |
|
| Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 243.1 |
| | $ | 277.2 |
| | $ | 295.5 |
| | $ | 275.9 |
| | $ | 264.0 |
| | $ | 241.8 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Adjusted EBITDA growth, as reported | (12 | )% | | | | | 5 | % | | | | |
| Adjusted EBITDA growth, constant currency adjusted | (10 | )% | | | | | 5 | % | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 243.1 |
| | $ | 277.2 |
| | $ | 295.5 |
| | $ | 275.9 |
| | $ | 264.0 |
| | $ | 241.8 |
|
| Cash payments for interest | | (42.1 | ) | | (41.1 | ) | | (43.9 | ) | | (41.9 | ) | | (41.6 | ) | | (42.1 | ) |
| Cash taxes, net | | (64.4 | ) | | (6.4 | ) | | (8.0 | ) | |
| Cash payments for taxes, net of refunds | | | (5.0 | ) | | (9.5 | ) | | (64.4 | ) |
| Payments related to IRS tax matter | | 61.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 61.0 |
|
| Cash payments for capital expenditures | | (109.9 | ) | | (85.8 | ) | | (48.8 | ) | | (83.6 | ) | | (82.8 | ) | | (109.9 | ) |
| Cash payments for agent signing bonuses | | (87.3 | ) | | (93.9 | ) | | (45.0 | ) | | (40.3 | ) | | (34.0 | ) | | (87.3 | ) |
| Adjusted Free Cash Flow | | $ | 0.4 |
| | $ | 50.0 |
| | $ | 149.8 |
| | $ | 105.1 |
| | $ | 96.1 |
| | $ | (0.9 | ) |
| (1) Stock-based compensation, contingent performance awards payable after three years and certain incentive compensation. | |
| (2) Non-cash charge resulting from the partial buyout of the defined benefit pension plan. | |
| (3) Fees and expenses related to certain legal and contingent matters. | |
| (4) Professional and legal fees incurred for the April 2, 2014 equity transactions. | |
| (5) Debt extinguishment costs in connection with the 2013 Credit Agreement and Note Repurchase. | |
| (1) 2017 consists primarily of an $85.0 million accrual related to the DPA net of a one-time insurance settlement of $1.3 million. | | (1) 2017 consists primarily of an $85.0 million accrual related to the DPA net of a one-time insurance settlement of $1.3 million. |
(2) Costs include, but are not limited to, legal, investment banking and consultant fees and other one-time integration planning costs.
| | (2) Costs include, but are not limited to, legal, investment banking and consultant fees and other one-time integration planning costs.
|
20152017 Compared to 20142016
The Company generated EBITDA of $142.7$135.7 million and $226.1$221.4 million and Adjusted EBITDA of $275.9 million and $264.0 million for the years ended December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively. The decrease of $83.4 million wasAdjusted EBITDA increased when compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to thea decrease in revenue mostly astotal operating expenses driven by a result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollardecrease in net salaries, related payroll taxes and an increase incash incentive compensation, outsourcing, independent contractor and benefits expense of $34.1 million as a result of an increase in stock-basedconsultant costs and contingent performance compensation and a $13.8 million pension settlement charge, which are listed as EBITDA adjustments in the table above. In addition, we did not have net securities gains in 2015 as compared to $45.4 million in 2014.
In 2015, Adjustedmarketing costs. EBITDA decreased $34.1 million, or 12 percent, primarily due to an $85.0 million accrual related to the same factors impacting EBITDA offset by changesDPA discussed in more detail in Note 13 — Commitments and Contingencies of the EBITDA adjustments previously discussed.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements when compared to 2016.
For 2015,2017, Adjusted Free Cash Flow decreased $49.6 million or 99 percent.increased by $9.0 million. The decreaseincrease was a result of declineincrease in Adjusted EBITDA, and increased capital expenditures,decreases in payments for net cash taxes, partially offset by decreased cash payments forincreases in agent signing bonuses.
20142016 Compared to 20132015
For 2014,2016, the Company generated EBITDA of $226.1$221.4 million and Adjustedadjusted EBITDA of $277.2$264.0 million. When compared to 2013,2015, Adjusted EBITDA remained stable.increased $22.2 million. The declineincrease in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily driven by an increase in money transfer fee and other revenue and a decrease in the pension expense. The increase in EBITDA was driven by the costs incurred forsame factors that impacted Adjusted EBITDA and lower expense related to the 2014 Global Transformation Program were offset by a decrease in commissions expense and the $45.4 million of net securities gains in 2014.
In 2014, Adjusted EBITDA decreased $18.3 million, or 6 percent, as a result of a decline in average face value per transaction, pricing and an increase in expenses for marketing.Program.
For 2014,2016, Adjusted Free Cash Flow decreased $99.8 million, or 67 percent, to $50.0 million from $149.8 million in 2013.increased by $97.0 million. The decreaseincrease was a result of an increase of $48.9 million in cash paid for agent signing bonuses, an increase in cash paidAdjusted EBITDA, decreases in payments for capital expenditures of $37.0 million primarily in connection with the 2014 Global Transformation Program, and overall fee and other revenue decline of 1 percent when compared to 2013.agent signing bonuses.
See "Results of Operations" and "Analysis of Cash Flows" sections for additional information regarding these changes.
Acquisition and Disposal Activity
We did not complete any acquisitions in 2015.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have various resources available for purposes of managing liquidity and capital needs, including our investment portfolio, credit facilities and letters of credit. We refer to our cash and cash equivalents, settlement cash and cash equivalents, interest-bearing investments and available-for-sale investments collectively as our “investment portfolio.” The company utilizes cash and cash equivalents in various liquidity and capital assessments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Settlement Assets and Payment Service Obligations
The following table shows the components of the Company's cash and cash equivalents and our settlement assets as of December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 164.5 |
| | $ | 250.6 |
| $ | 190.0 |
| | $ | 157.2 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Settlement assets: | | | | | | |
| Settlement cash and cash equivalents | 1,560.7 |
| | 1,657.3 |
| 1,469.9 |
| | 1,365.0 |
|
| Receivables, net | 861.4 |
| | 757.6 |
| 1,125.8 |
| | 999.4 |
|
| Interest-bearing investments | 1,062.4 |
| | 1,091.6 |
| 1,154.2 |
| | 1,252.1 |
|
| Available-for-sale investments | 21.1 |
| | 27.1 |
| 7.0 |
| | 17.8 |
|
| | 3,505.6 |
| | 3,533.6 |
| 3,756.9 |
| | 3,634.3 |
|
| Payment service obligations | $ | (3,505.6 | ) | | $ | (3,533.6 | ) | $ | (3,756.9 | ) | | $ | (3,634.3 | ) |
Our primary sources of liquidity include cash flows generated by the sale of our payment instruments, our cash and cash equivalent and interest-bearing investment balances, proceeds from our investment portfolio and credit capacity under our credit facilities. Our primary operating liquidity needs are related to the settlement of payment service obligations to our agents and financial institution customers, general operating expenses and debt service.
To meet our payment service obligations at all times, we must have sufficient highly liquid assets and be able to move funds globally on a timely basis. On average, we receive in and pay out a similar amount of funds on a daily basis to collect and settle the principal amount of our payment instruments sold and related fees and commissions with our end consumers and agents. This pattern of cash flows allows us to settle our payment service obligations through ongoing cash generation rather than liquidating investments or utilizing our Revolving Credit Facility.revolving credit facility. We have historically generated, and expect to continue generating, sufficient cash flows from daily operations to fund ongoing operational needs.
We seek to maintain funding capacity beyond our daily operating needs to provide a cushion through the normal fluctuations in our payment service obligations, as well as to provide working capital for the operational and growth requirements of our business. We believe we have sufficient liquid assets and funding capacity to operate and grow our business for the next 12 months. Should our liquidity needs exceed our operating cash flows, we believe that external financing sources, including availability under our credit facilities, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated funding requirements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Interest-bearing Investments
To ensure we maintain adequate liquidity to meet our operating needs at all times, we keep a significant portion of our investment portfolio in cash and cash equivalents and interest-bearing investments at financial institutions rated A- or better by two of the following three rating agencies: Moody’s Investor Service ("Moody’s"Moody's"), Standard & Poor's ("S&P") and Fitch Ratings, Inc. ("Fitch"); and in AAA rated U.S. government money market funds. If the rating agencies have split ratings, the Company uses the lower of the highest two out of three ratings across the agencies for disclosure purposes. If none of the three rating agencies have the same rating,institution has only two ratings, the Company uses the lowest rating acrosslower of the agenciestwo ratings for disclosure purposes. As of December 31, 2015,2017, cash and cash equivalents (including unrestricted and settlement cash and cash equivalents) and interest-bearing investments totaled $2.8 billion. Cash and cash equivalents consist of interest-bearing deposit accounts, non-interest bearing transaction accounts and money market securities; interest-bearing investments consist of time deposits and certificates of deposit and money market funds that invest in U.S. government and government agency securities.with maturities of up to 24 months.
Available-for-sale Investments
Our investment portfolio includes $21.1$7.0 million of available-for-sale investments as of December 31, 2015.2017. U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities compose $9.5$5.6 million of our available-for-sale investments, while asset-backed and other asset-backed securities compose the remaining $11.6$1.4 million.
Clearing and Cash Management Banks
We collect and disburse money through a network of clearing and cash management banks. The relationships with these banks are a critical component of our ability to maintain our global active funding requirements on a timely basis. We have agreements with six active clearing banks that provide clearing and processing functions for official checks, money orders and other draft instruments. We have four active official check clearing banks, which provide sufficient capacity for our official check business. We rely on three active banks to clear our retail money orders and believe that these banks provide sufficient capacity for that business. We also maintain relationships with a variety of domestic and international cash management banks for electronic funds transfer and wire transfer services used in the movement of consumer funds and agent settlements.
Special Purpose Entities
For certain financial institution customers, we established individual special purpose entities ("SPEs") upon the origination of our relationship. Along with operational processes and certain financial covenants, these SPEs provide the financial institutions with additional assurance of our ability to clear their official checks. For the years ending December 31, 2015 and 2014, these SPEs had settlement assets equal to payment service obligations of $2.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively. See Note 1 — Description of the Business and Basis of Presentation of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure.
Credit Facilities
On March 28, 2013, we entered into the 2013 Credit Agreement with BOA, as administrative agent, the financial institutions party thereto as lenders and the other agents party thereto. The 2013 Credit Agreement provided for (i) a senior secured five-year Revolving Credit Facility up to an aggregate principal amount of $125.0 million and (ii) a senior secured seven-year term loan facility of $850.0 million (“Term Credit Facility”). The Revolving Credit Facility includes a sub-facility that permits the Company to request the issuance of letters of credit up to an aggregate amount of $50.0 million, with borrowings available for general corporate purposes and which would reduce the amount available under the Revolving Credit Facility.
On April 2, 2014, we entered into the Incremental Agreement with BOA, as administrative agent, and various lenders, which provided for (i) a tranche under the Term Credit Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $130.0 million, (ii) an increase in the aggregate revolving loan commitments under the 2013 Credit Agreement from $125.0 million to $150.0 million, and (iii) certain other amendments to the 2013 Credit Agreement.
On December 12, 2016, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 to the 2013 Credit Agreement (the "2016 Amendment") with BOA and various lenders. The 2016 Amendment includes, but is not limited to, decreasing the aggregate revolving credit commitments from $150.0 million to $125.0 million from December 12, 2016 to March 27, 2018 (the remainder of the original Revolving Credit Facility term), and increasing the maximum secured leverage ratio, effective the first quarter of 2017. The 2016 Amendment also extends the maturity date of the revolving credit commitments of the extending lenders, which represent commitments of $85.8 million in the aggregate, from March 28, 2018 to September 28, 2019.
The following table is a summary of ourthe Company's outstanding debt balances, netbalance as of unamortized debt discount and debt issuance costs at December 31:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Interest Rate for 2015 | | Original Facility Size | | Outstanding | | 2016 Interest (1) |
| (Amounts in millions, except percentages) | 2015 | | 2014 | |
| 2013 Credit Agreement | | | | | | | | | |
| Senior secured credit facility, net | 4.25 | % | | $ | 980.0 |
| | $ | 942.6 |
| | $ | 949.6 |
| | $ | 41.1 |
|
(1) Reflects interest expected to be paid in 2016 using the rates in effect on December 31, 2015, assuming no prepayments of principal. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| (Amounts in millions, except percentages) | Effective Interest Rate | | | | Effective Interest Rate | | |
| Senior secured credit facility due 2020 | 4.94 | % | | $ | 914.2 |
| | 4.25 | % | | $ | 924.0 |
|
| Unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discount | | | (6.1 | ) | | | | (8.8 | ) |
| Total debt, net | | | $ | 908.1 |
| | | | $ | 915.2 |
|
As of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company had no outstanding letters of credit or borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, leaving $150.0$125.0 million of borrowing capacity thereunder. The Company's effective interest rate on senior secured borrowings increased from 4.25% as of December 31, 2016 to 4.94% as of December 31, 2017 due to an increase in the Eurodollar rate.
The 2013 Credit Agreement contains various financial and non-financial covenants. We continuously monitor our compliance with our debt covenants. At December 31, 2015,2017, the Company was in compliance with its financial covenants.
See Note 98 — Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure related to the Company's credit facilities and financial covenants.
Equity Registration Rights Agreement
The Company and the Investors entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the "Equity Registration Rights Agreement") on March 25, 2008, with respect to the Series B Stock, D Stock, and the common stock owned by the Investors and their affiliates, also referred to collectively as the Registrable Securities. Under the terms of the Equity Registration Rights Agreement, we are required to file with the SEC a shelf registration statement relating to the offer and sale of the Registrable Securities and keep such shelf registration statement continuously effective under the Securities Act until the earlier of (1) the date as of which all of the Registrable Securities have been sold, (2) the date as of which each of the holders of the Registrable Securities is permitted to sell its Registrable Securities without registration pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act and (3) fifteen years. The holders of the Registrable Securities are also entitled to six demand registrations and unlimited piggyback registrations during the term of the Equity Registration Rights Agreement. The SEC has declared effective a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 that permits the offer and sale of the Registrable Securities, as required by the terms of the Equity Registration Rights Agreement. The registration statement also permits the Company to offer and sell up to $500 million of its common stock, preferred stock, debt securities or any combination of these, from time to time, subject to market conditions and the Company’s capital needs.
Credit Ratings
As of December 31, 2015,2017, our credit ratings from Moody’s and S&P were B1 and B+, respectively, both with a stable outlook. On April 13, 2015, S&P lowered our credit rating from BB- with a negative outlook toand B+ with a stable outlook.outlook, respectively. Our credit facilities, regulatory capital requirements and other obligations were not impacted, and will not be impacted by a future change in our credit ratings.
Regulatory Capital Requirements and Contractual Obligations
Regulatory Capital Requirements
We have capital requirements relating to government regulations in the U.S. and other countries where we operate. Such regulations typically require us to maintain certain assets in a defined ratio to our payment service obligations. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary and licensed entity, MPSI, we are regulated in the U.S. by various state agencies that generally require us to maintain a pool of liquid assets and investments in an amount generally equal to the regulatory payment service obligation measure, as defined by each state, for our regulated payment instruments, namely teller checks, agent checks, money orders and money transfers. The regulatory requirements do not require us to specify individual assets held to meet our payment service obligations, nor are we required to deposit specific assets into a trust, escrow or other special account. Rather, we must maintain a pool of liquid assets. Provided we maintain a total pool of liquid assets sufficient to meet the regulatory and contractual requirements, we are able to withdraw, deposit or sell our individual liquid assets at will, without prior notice, penalty or limitations. We were in compliance with all state capital requirements as of December 31, 2015.2017.
We are also subject to regulatory capital requirements in various countries outside of the U.S., which typically result in a requirement to either prefund agent settlements or hold minimum required levels of cash or guarantees within the applicable country. The amounts can fluctuate based on our level of activity and is likely to increase over time as our business expands internationally. Assets used to meet these regulatory requirements support our payment service obligations and are not available to satisfy other liquidity needs. As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had $103.2$83.5 million of prefunds and cash designated to meet regulatory capital requirements and such amounts are included in "Settlement assets" on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
We were in compliance with all regulatory capital requirements as of December 31, 2015.2017. We believe that our liquidity and capital resources will remain sufficient to ensure ongoing compliance with all regulatory capital requirements.
Contractual Obligations
The following table includes aggregated information about the Company’s contractual obligations that impact our liquidity and capital needs. The table includes information about payments due under specified contractual obligations, aggregated by type of contractual obligation as of December 31, 2015:2017:
| | | | Payments due by period | Payments due by period |
| (Amounts in millions) | Total | | Less than 1 year | | 1-3 years | | 3-5 years | | More than 5 years | Total | | Less than 1 year | | 1-3 years | | 3-5 years | | More than 5 years |
| Debt, including interest payments | $ | 1,125.3 |
| | $ | 50.9 |
| | $ | 100.3 |
| | $ | 974.1 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 1,025.4 |
| | $ | 57.5 |
| | $ | 967.9 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Operating leases | 59.1 |
| | 12.5 |
| | 19.8 |
| | 16.8 |
| | 10.0 |
| |
| Non-cancellable leases | | 65.0 |
| | 16.3 |
| | 27.5 |
| | 16.5 |
| | 4.7 |
|
| Signing bonuses | 72.4 |
| | 33.2 |
| | 33.3 |
| | 5.9 |
| | — |
| 34.0 |
| | 28.0 |
| | 6.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Marketing | 81.2 |
| | 22.3 |
| | 33.6 |
| | 18.0 |
| | 7.3 |
| 59.1 |
| | 22.3 |
| | 25.2 |
| | 9.8 |
| | 1.8 |
|
| Total contractual cash obligations | $ | 1,338.0 |
| | $ | 118.9 |
| | $ | 187.0 |
| | $ | 1,014.8 |
| | $ | 17.3 |
| $ | 1,183.5 |
| | $ | 124.1 |
| | $ | 1,026.6 |
| | $ | 26.3 |
| | $ | 6.5 |
|
Our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 20152017 includes $954.3$914.2 million of debt, netted with unamortized discounts of $0.6 million and unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discount of $11.1$6.1 million. The above table reflects the principal and interest that will be paid through the maturity of the debt using the rates in effect on December 31, 2015,2017, and assuming no prepayments of principal. OperatingNon-cancellable leases consist of variousinclude operating leases for buildings, vehicles and equipment used in our business.and other leases. Signing bonuses are payments to certain agents and financial institution customers as an incentive to enter into long-term contracts. Marketing represents contractual marketing obligations with certain agents, billers and corporate sponsorships. We have other commitments as described further below that are not included in this table as the timing and/or amount of payments are difficult to estimate.
We have a funded, noncontributory defined benefit pension plan ("Pension Plan") that is frozen to both future benefit accruals and new participants. It is our policy to fund at least the minimum required contribution each year plus additional discretionary amounts as available and necessary to minimize expenses of the plan. We made contributions of $8.0 million to the Pension Plan during 2015.2017. Although the Company has no minimum required contribution for the Pension Plan in 2016,2018, we expect to contribute $8.0 million to the Pension Plan in 2016.2018.
The Company has certain unfunded defined benefit plans: supplemental executive retirement plans (“SERPs”), which are unfunded non-qualified defined benefit pension plans providing postretirement income to their participants; and a postretirement plan ("Postretirement Benefits") that provides medical and life insurance for its participants. These plans require payments over extended periods of time. The Company will continue to make contributions to the SERPs and the Postretirement Benefits to the extent benefits are paid. Aggregate benefits paid for the unfunded plans are expected to be $7.9$7.0 million in 2016.2018.
TheAs discussed in Note 13 — Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the IRS completed its examination of the Company’s consolidated income tax returns for the tax years 2011 through 2013 and issued a RARNotices of Deficiency for 2005-2007 and 2009 and an Examination Report for 2008. The Notices of Deficiency and Examination Report disallow, among other items, approximately $900.0 million of ordinary deductions on securities losses in the first quarter2007, 2008 and 2009 tax returns. In May 2012 and December 2012, the Company filed petitions in the U.S. Tax Court challenging the 2005-2007 and 2009 Notices of 2015 that included disallowing $100.0Deficiency, respectively. In 2013, the Company reached a partial settlement with the IRS allowing ordinary loss treatment on $186.9 million of deductions related to restitution payments the Company made to the United States government in connection with the DPA with the MDPA and the U.S. DOJ. The Company filed a protest letter contesting the adjustment and is now scheduled to discuss this matter with the IRS Appeals Division in early 2016. See Note 13 — Income Taxes of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion regarding this matter. If the Company’s positions in the 2011 through 2013 audit are ultimately rejected, the Company would be required to make additional cash payments based on benefits taken and taxable income earned.
As discussed in Note 13 — Income Taxes of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements,dispute. In January 2015, the U.S. Tax Court granted the IRS's motion for summary judgment upholding the remaining adjustments in the Notices of Deficiency for 2005-2007 and 2009, which resulted inDeficiency. During 2015, the Company makingmade payments to the IRS of $61.0 million for federal tax payments and associated interest related to the matter. The Company believes that it has appealedsubstantive tax law arguments in favor of its position. The Company filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Tax Court decisionon July 27, 2015 for an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Oral arguments were held before the Fifth Circuit on June 7, 2016, and on November 15, 2016, the Fifth Circuit vacated the Tax Court’s decision and remanded the case to the Tax Court for further proceedings. The Company filed a motion for summary judgment in the Tax Court on May 31, 2017. On August 23, 2017, the IRS filed a motion for summary judgment and its response to the Company’s motion for summary judgment. Pending the outcome of the appeal, the Company may be required to file amended state returns and make additional cash payments of up to $17.0$18.7 million on amounts that have previously been accrued.
In limited circumstances as an incentive to new or renewing agents, the Company may grant minimum commission guarantees for a specified period of time at a contractually specified amount. Under the guarantees, the Company will pay to the agent the difference between the contractually specified minimum commission and the actual commissions earned by the agent. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the minimum commission guarantees had a maximum payment of $11.3$2.1 million over a weighted average remaining term of 1.90.6 years. The maximum payment is calculated as the contractually guaranteed minimum commission times the remaining term of the contract and, therefore, assumes that the agent generates no money transfer transactions during the remainder of its contract. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the liability for minimum commission guarantees was $3.2$1.2 million. Minimum commission guarantees are not reflected in the table above.
Analysis of Cash Flows
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 vs 2014 | | 2014 vs 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 vs 2016 | | 2016 vs 2015 |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 33.6 |
| | $ | 62.3 |
| | $ | 156.1 |
| | $ | (28.7 | ) | | $ | (93.8 | ) | $ | 132.5 |
| | $ | 120.9 |
| | $ | 34.1 |
| | $ | 11.6 |
| | $ | 86.8 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (109.5 | ) | | (96.4 | ) | | (63.5 | ) | | (13.1 | ) | | (32.9 | ) | (83.6 | ) | | (82.8 | ) | | (109.5 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | 26.7 |
|
| Net cash used in financing activities | (10.2 | ) | | (34.1 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | 23.9 |
| | (32.4 | ) | (16.1 | ) | | (45.4 | ) | | (10.7 | ) | | 29.3 |
| | (34.7 | ) |
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (86.1 | ) | | $ | (68.2 | ) | | $ | 90.9 |
| | $ | (17.9 | ) | | $ | (159.1 | ) | $ | 32.8 |
| | $ | (7.3 | ) | | $ | (86.1 | ) | | $ | 40.1 |
| | $ | 78.8 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
During 2015,2017, cash provided by operating activities decreased by $28.7 million from $62.3 million in 2014 primarilyincreased due to the decrease in net income of $149.0 million and a decrease in accounts payablecash taxes, net and other liabilities mainly due to net cash taxreduction in expenditures for working capital items. The increase was partially offset by an increase in signing bonus payments of $64.4$6.3 million in 2015. The decrease indriven by the timing of agent expansion and retention efforts.
During 2016, cash provided by operating activities was primarily offset by the change in other assets due to the 2015 foreign currency settlements related to our forward contracts, the impact of the change in deferred taxes and the 2015 liquidation of the rabbi trusts associated with the deferred compensation plan.
Cash provided by operating activities decreased for the year ended December 31, 2014increased due to an increase in net income and a decrease in signing bonus payments. Cash providedpayments of $53.3 million driven by operating activitiesthe timing of agent expansion and retention efforts. This increase was partially offset by increased payments for employee performance bonuses and a payment of $13.0 million related to the year ended December 31, 2013 due to an increaseState Civil Investigative Demands matter in consolidated operating income.March 2016.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Items impacting net cash used in investing activities in 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 were primarily from capital expenditures of $83.6 million, $82.8 million and $109.9 million, $85.8 million and $48.8 million, respectively. Additionally, during 2014 and 2013 cash paid for acquisitions was $11.5 million and $15.4 million, respectively.Capital expenditures remained relatively flat when compared to 2016.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
In 2017, items impacting net cash used in financing activities were $9.8 million of principal payments on debt and payments to tax authorities for stock-based compensation of $8.0 million. In 2016, items impacting net cash used in financing activities were $30.3 million of principal payments on debt, which included additional principal payments totaling $20.0 million made on the Term Credit Facility in the fourth quarter of 2016, stock repurchases of $11.7 million and payments to tax authorities for stock-based compensation of $2.7 million. In 2015, items impacting net cash used in financing activities were $9.8 million principal payments on debt, payments to tax authorities for stock-based compensation of $0.5 million and $0.4 million of stock repurchases. In 2014, financing activities used $34.1 million of cash, primarily associated with stock repurchases. The proceeds from the debt issuance pursuant to the 2013 Credit Agreement were used to fund most of this stock repurchase. In 2013, financing activities used $1.7 million of cash primarily associated with the 2013 Credit Agreement.
Stockholders’ Deficit
Stockholders’ Deficit — The Company is authorized to repurchase up to 12,000,000 shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had repurchased a total of 8,277,0739,842,509 shares of our common stock under this authorization and have remaining authorization to purchase up to 3,722,9272,157,491 shares.
Under the terms of our outstanding credit facilities, we are limitedrestricted in our ability to pay dividends on our common stock. No dividends were paid on our common stock in 2015,2017, and we do not anticipate declaring any dividends on our common stock during 2016.2018.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On a regular basis, management reviews its accounting policies, assumptions and estimates to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with GAAP. Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Critical accounting policies are those policies that management believes are very important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations, and that require management to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex. Based on these criteria, management has identified and discussed with the Audit Committee the following critical accounting policies and estimates, including the methodology and disclosures related to those estimates.
Goodwill — We have two reporting units: Global Funds Transfer and Financial Paper Products. Our Global Funds Transfer reporting unit is the only reporting unit that carries goodwill. On an annual basis,We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually as of October 1, or more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events,events. When testing goodwill for impairment, we may elect to perform either a qualitative test for goodwill impairment usingor a two-step process. The first stepquantitative test to determine if it is to identify a potential impairment by comparingmore likely than not that the faircarrying value of a reporting unit withexceeds its estimated fair value. During a qualitative analysis, we consider the impact of any changes to the following factors: macroeconomic, industry and market factors, cost factors, and changes in overall financial performance, as well as any other relevant events and uncertainties impacting a reporting unit. If our qualitative assessment does not conclude that it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is greater than the carrying amount. Thevalue, we perform a quantitative analysis. In a quantitative testing, the fair value of a reporting unit is determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis and further analyzed using other methods of valuation. A discounted cash flow analysis requires us to make various
assumptions, including assumptions about future cash flows, growth rates and discount rates. The assumptions about future cash flows and growth rates are based on our long-term projections by reporting unit. In addition, an assumed terminal value is used to project future cash flows beyond base years. Assumptions used in our impairment testing are consistent with our internal forecasts and operating plans. Our discount rate is based on our debt and equity balances, adjusted for current market conditions and investor expectations of return on our equity. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, there is no impairment. If not, we compare the second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwillunit with its carrying amount. To the extent the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwillunit exceeds its implied fair value, a write-down of the reporting unit’s goodwill would be necessary.
We did not recognize a goodwill impairment loss for 2015, 20142017, 2016 or 2013.2015. The carrying value of goodwill assigned to the Global Funds Transfer reporting unit at December 31, 20152017 was $442.2 million. The annualBy analyzing the qualitative factors discussed above, we determined that a quantitative impairment test indicated a fair value foranalysis was not needed. As of October 1, 2017, the Global Funds Transfer reporting unit carrying value remained relatively unchanged when compared to the prior year. Additionally, as of the 2017 test date, the Company's market price more than doubled when compared to the prior year test date and there were no significant changes to the reporting unit's cash flows and growth rates. As such, we concluded that the Global Funds Transfer reporting unit's fair value was substantially in excess of the reporting unit’sunit's carrying value. In order to evaluate the sensitivity
As of the fair value calculations, we applied a hypothetical 10 percent decrease toDecember 31, 2017, there were no qualitative factors that indicated that the fair value of the Global Funds Transfer reporting unit. Hadunit is less than the estimated fair value been hypothetically lower by 10 percent as of December 31, 2015, the fair value of goodwill would still be substantially in excess of the reporting unit’s carrying value.
Fair Value of Investment Securities — The Company has available-for-sale investments that are recorded at their estimated fair value. Our available-for-sale investments consist of residential mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities.
We estimate fair value for our investments at an “exit price,” or the exchange price that would be received for an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants. Observable price quotes for our exact securities are not available. For our government agency residential mortgage-backed securities, similar securities trade with sufficient regularity to allow observation of market inputs needed to estimate fair value. For our other asset-backed securities, the overall liquidity and trading within the relevant markets is not strong. Accordingly, observable market inputs are not as readily available and estimating fair value is more subjective. See Note 4 — Fair Value Measurement of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure.
Pension — Through the Company's Pension Plan and SERPs, collectively referred to as our “Pension," we provide defined benefit pension plan coverage to certain of our employees and certain employees of Viad Corporation, our former parent. Our pension obligations under these plans are measured as of December 31, the measurement date. Pension benefit obligations and the related expense are based upon actuarial projections using assumptions regarding mortality, discount rates, long-term return on assets and other factors.
Our assumptions reflect our historical experience and management’s best judgment regarding future expectations. Certain of the assumptions, particularly the discount rate and expected return on plan assets, require significant judgment and could have a material impact on the measurement of our pension obligation.
At December 31, 2015, the Company changed its method of estimating
In order to estimate the interest cost components of net periodic benefit expense for its Pension and Postretirement Benefits. Previously,Benefits, the Company estimated the interest cost components utilizing a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve used to measure the benefit obligation. The new method utilizes a full yield curve approach in the estimation of these components by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to their underlying projected cash flows. This method provides a more precise measurement of interest costs by improving the correlation between projected benefit cash flows and their corresponding spot rates. The change does not affect the measurement of our total benefit obligations and is accounted for as a change in accounting estimate, which is applied prospectively. For 2016, the change in estimate is expected to reduce Pension and Postretirement Benefits net periodic benefit expense from $8.4 million to $6.6 million.
At each measurement date, the discount rate used to measure total benefit obligation for the Pension and Postretirement Benefits is based on the then current interest rate yield curves for long-term corporate debt securities with maturities rated AA comparable to our obligations.
Our Pension Plan assets are primarily invested in short-term investment fund accounts and commingled trust funds issued or sponsored by the plan trustee.funds. Our investments are periodically realigned in accordance with the investment guidelines. The expected return on Pension Plan assets is based on our historical market experience, our asset allocations and our expectations for long-term rates of return. We also consider peer data and historical returns to assess the reasonableness and appropriateness of our assumption. Our Pension Plan asset allocations are reviewed annuallyperiodically and are based upon plan obligations,funded ratio, an evaluation of market conditions, tolerance for risk and cash requirements for benefit payments.
Lower discount rates increase the Pension and Postretirement Benefits obligation and subsequent year pension expense, while higher discount rates decrease the Pension and Postretirement Benefits obligation and subsequent year pension expense. Decreasing the discount rate by 50 basis points would have increased the 20152017 Pension and Postretirement Benefits net periodic benefit expense by $0.7$0.3 million. If the discount rate increased by 50 basis points, the Pension and Postretirement Benefits net periodic benefit expense would have decreased by $0.6$0.2 million. Decreasing the expected rate of return by 50 basis points would have decreasedincreased the 20152017 Pension Plan net periodic benefit expense by $0.7$0.6 million and increasing the expected rate of return by 50 basis points would have decreased the 2017 Pension Plan net periodic benefit expense by $0.6 million.
Income Taxes, Tax Contingencies — We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and various foreign jurisdictions. In determining taxable income, income or loss before taxes is adjusted for differences between local tax laws and GAAP.
We file tax returns in multiple states within the U.S. and various countries. Generally, our tax filings are subject to audit by tax authorities for three to five years following submission of a return. Specifically,With a few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to foreign or U.S., state and local income tax examinations for years prior to 2012. The U.S. federal income tax filings are subject to audit for fiscal years 20112014 through 2014.2017.
The benefits of tax positions are recorded in the income statement if we determine it is more-likely-than-not, based on the technical merits of the position, that the tax position will be sustained upon examination, including any related appeals or litigation.
Changes in tax laws, regulations, agreements and treaties, foreign currency exchange restrictions or our level of operations or profitability in each taxing jurisdiction could have an impact on the amount of income taxes that we provide during any given year. The determination of taxable income in any jurisdiction requires the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and the use of estimates and assumptions regarding significant future events, such as the amount, timing and character of deductions and the sources and character of income and tax credits.
These assumptions and probabilities are periodically reviewed and revised based upon new information.
Changes in our current estimates due to unanticipated events, or other factors, could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Actual tax amounts may be materially different from amounts accrued based upon the results of audits due to different interpretations by the tax authorities than those of the Company. While we believe that our reserves are adequate to cover reasonably expected tax risks, an unfavorable tax settlement generally requires the use of cash and an increase in the amount of income tax expense that we recognize. A favorable tax settlement generally requires a decrease in the amount of income taxes that we recognize.
Income Taxes, Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets — Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences that exist between the financial statement carrying value of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis, and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards on a taxing jurisdiction basis. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using enacted statutory tax rates that will apply in the years in which we expect the temporary differences to be recovered or paid.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets must be reduced through a valuation allowance if it is more-likely-than-not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In the period in which a valuation allowance is recorded, we would record tax expense, whereas a tax benefit would be recorded in the period a valuation allowance is released.
In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider both positive and negative evidence related to the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be realized. Our assessment of whether a valuation allowance is required or should be adjusted requires judgment and is completed on a taxing jurisdiction basis. We consider, among other matters: the nature, frequency and severity of any cumulative financial reporting losses; the ability to carry back losses to prior years; future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences; tax planning strategies and projections of future taxable income. We also consider our best estimate of the outcome of any on-going examinations based on the technical merits of the position, historical procedures and case law, among other items.
As of December 31, 2015,2017, we have recorded a valuation allowance of $125.8$75.9 million against deferred tax assets of $216.1$133.6 million. The valuation allowance primarily relates to basis differences in revalued investments, capital losses and certain foreign tax loss carryovers and basis difference in revalued investments.carryovers. While we believe that the basis for estimating our valuation allowance is appropriate, changes in our current estimates due to unanticipated events, or other factors, could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Stock-based compensation — The Company has not completed its accounting for the income tax effects of the TCJA. Where the Company has been able to make reasonable estimates of the effects, the Company has recorded provisional amounts in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118. Where the Company has not yet been able to make reasonable estimates of the impact of certain elements, the Company has not recorded any amounts related to those elements and has continued accounting for them in accordance with ASC 740 on the basis of the tax laws in effect immediately prior to the enactment of the TCJA.
The TCJA reduces the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. While the accounting is incomplete, the Company has made a stock-based compensation plan,reasonable estimate and recorded a provisional decrease to net U.S. deferred tax liabilities of $19.8 million with a corresponding increase to deferred tax benefit. Based on further analysis of the estimates and additional guidance on the application of the law, it is anticipated that revisions may occur throughout the allowable measurement period.
Transition Tax on unrepatriated foreign earnings: The Transition Tax on unrepatriated foreign earnings is a tax on previously untaxed accumulated and current earnings and profits ("E&P") of the Company's foreign subsidiaries. To determine the amount of the Transition Tax, the Company must determine, among other factors, the amount of post-1986 E&P of its foreign subsidiaries, as well as the amount of non-U.S. income taxes paid on such earnings. The Company made a reasonable estimate of the Transition Tax and has recorded a provisional Transition Tax expense. After the utilization of foreign tax credits related to undistributed foreign subsidiary E&P and other existing foreign tax credits, the Company expects a net zero liability associated with the deemed mandatory repatriation. The Company is continuing to gather additional information to more precisely compute the amount of the Transition Tax to complete its calculation of E&P as well as the final determination of non-U.S. income taxes paid.
Due to the complexity of the new tax laws around global intangible low taxed income (“GILTI”), the Company is continuing to evaluate how the income tax provision will be accounted for under the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles wherein companies are allowed to make an accounting policy election of either (i) account for GILTI as a component of tax expense in the period in which includes stock options and restricted stock units. Certain awards arethe Company is subject to performance conditions at threshold, target and maximum levels.
For purposesthe rules (the “period cost method”), or (ii) account for GILTI in the Company’s measurement of determining the fair value of stock option awards,deferred taxes (the “deferred method”). Currently, the Company uses the Black-Scholes single option pricing model for the time-based awardshas not elected a method and performance-based tranches. Compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, is recognized using a straight-line method over the vesting or service period.
Assumptions for stock-based compensation include estimating the future volatility of our stock price, expected dividend yield, employee turnover and employee exercise activity.
Performance-based share awards require management to make assumptions regarding the likelihood of achieving performance goals. Assumptions used in our assessment are consistent with our internal forecasts and operating plans and assume achievement of performance conditions as outlined in Note 12 — Stock-Based Compensation will only do so after its completion of the Notes toanalysis of the Consolidated Financial Statements.GILTI provisions.
Recent Accounting Developments
Recent accounting developments are set forth in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference herein may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements with respect to, among other things, the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of MoneyGram and its subsidiaries. Statements preceded by, followed by or that include words such as “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “projects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” "intends," “continues,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “would,” "goals" and other similar expressions are intended to identify some of the forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are included, along with this statement, for purposes of complying with the safe harbor provisions of the Act. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to, among others, the risks and uncertainties described in Part I, Item 1A under the caption "Risk Factors""Risk Factors" of this Annual Report. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and MoneyGram undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements for any reason, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by federal securities law. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations, beliefs and assumptions and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances due to a number of factors. These factors include, but are not limited to:
our ability to compete effectively;
our ability to maintain key agent or biller relationships, or a reduction in business or transaction volume from these relationships, including with our largest agent, Walmart, through theits introduction by Walmart of a competing white label branded money transfer productproducts or otherwise;
the impact of our U.S. to U.S. pricing strategy;
our ability to manage fraud risks from consumers or agents;
the ability of us and our agents to comply with U.S. and international laws and regulations;
litigation and regulatory proceedings involving us or our agents, including the outcome of ongoing investigations by several state governments, which could result in material settlements, fines or penalties, revocation of required licenses or registrations, termination of contracts, other administrative actions or lawsuits and negative publicity;
possible uncertainties relating to compliance with and the impact of the DPA;
current and proposed regulations addressing consumer privacy and data use and security;
our ability to successfully develop and timely introduce new and enhanced products and services and our investments in new products, services or infrastructure changes;
our substantial debt service obligations, significant debt covenant requirements and credit rating and our ability to maintain sufficient capital;
continued weakness in economic conditions, in both the U.S. and global markets;
our ability to manage risks associated with our international sales and operations;
our offering of money transfer services through agents in regions that are politically volatile or, in a limited number of cases, that aremay be subject to certain OFAC restrictions;
changes in tax laws or an unfavorable outcome with respect to the audit of our tax returns or tax positions, or a failure by us to establish adequate reserves for tax events;
our substantial debt service obligations, significant debt covenant requirements and credit rating and our ability to maintain sufficient capital;
our ability to manage risks associated with our international sales and operations;
major bank failure or sustained financial market illiquidity, or illiquidity at our clearing, cash management and custodial financial institutions;
the ability of us and our agents to maintain adequate banking relationships;
a security or privacy breach in systems, networks or databases on which we rely;
disruptions to our computer systems and data centers and our ability to effectively operate and adapt our technology;
weakened consumer confidencechanges in our businesstax laws or money transfers generally;
continued weakness in economic conditions, in both the U.S. and global markets;unfavorable outcomes of tax positions we take, or a failure by us to establish adequate reserves for tax events;
a significant change, material slow down or complete disruption of international migration patterns;
the financial health of certain European countries, and the impact that those countries may have on the sustainability of the euro;
our ability to manage credit risks from our retail agents and official check financial institution customers;
our ability to retain partners to operate our official check and money order businesses;
our ability to adequately protect our brand and intellectual property rights and to avoid infringing on the rights of others;
our ability to attract and retain key employees;
our ability to manage risks related to the operation of retail locations and the acquisition or start-up of businesses;
any restructuring actions and cost reduction initiatives that we undertake may not deliver the expected results and these actions may adversely affect our business;
our ability to maintain effective internal controls;
our capital structure and the special voting rights provided to designees ofthe THL Representatives on our Board of Directors; and
the risks and uncertainties described in the “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as any additional risk factors that may be described in our other filings with the SEC from time to time.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Enterprise Risk Management
Risk is an inherent part of any business. Our most prominent risk exposures are credit, interest rate and foreign currency exchange. See Part 1, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of the principal risks to our business. Appropriately managing risk is important to the success of our business, and the extent to which we effectively manage each of the various types of risk is critical to our financial condition and profitability. Our risk management objective is to monitor and control risk exposures to produce steady earnings growth and long-term economic value.
Management implements policies approved by our Board of Directors that cover our investment, capital, credit and foreign currency practices and strategies. The Board receives periodic reports regarding each of these areas and approves significant changes to policy and strategy. The Asset/Liability Committee composed of senior management, routinely reviews investment and risk management strategies and results. The Credit Committee, composed of senior management, routinely reviews credit exposure to our agents.
The following is a discussion of the risks we have deemed most critical to our business and the strategies we use to manage and mitigate such risks. While containing forward-looking statements related to risks and uncertainties, this discussion and related analyses are not predictions of future events. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated due to various factors discussed under “Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and under “Risk Factors” in Part 1, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Credit Risk
Credit risk, or the potential risk that we may not collect amounts owed to us, affects our business primarily through receivables, investments and derivative financial instruments. In addition, the concentration of our cash, cash equivalents and investments at large financial institutions exposes us to credit risk.
Investment Portfolio — Credit risk from our investment portfolio relates to the risk that we may be unable to collect the interest or principal owed to us under the legal terms of the various securities. Our primary exposure to credit risk arises through the concentration of a large amount of our investment portfolio at a few large banks, also referred to as financial institution risk, as well as a concentration in securities issued by or collateralized by, U.S. government agencies.
At December 31, 2015,2017, the Company’s investment portfolio of $2.8 billion was primarily comprised of cash and cash equivalents, consisting of interest-bearing deposit accounts, non-interest bearing transaction accounts and money market funds backed by U.S. government money market securities, and interest-bearing investments consisting of time deposits and certificates of deposit. Based on investment policy restrictions, investments are limited to those rated A- or better by two of the following three rating agencies: Moody's, S&P and Fitch. If the rating agencies have split ratings, the Company uses the lower of the highest two out of three ratings across the agencies for disclosure purposes. If none of the three rating agencies have the same rating,institution has only two ratings, the Company uses the lowest rating acrosslower of the agenciestwo ratings for disclosure purposes. No maturity of interest-bearing investments exceeds 24 months from the date of purchase.
The financial institutions holding significant portions of our investment portfolio may act as custodians for our asset accounts, serve as counterparties to our foreign currency transactions and conduct cash transfers on our behalf for the purpose of clearing our payment instruments and related agent receivables and agent payables. Through certain check clearing agreements and other contracts, we are required to utilize several of these financial institutions.
The concentration in U.S. government agencies includes agencies placed under conservatorship by the U.S. government in 2008 and extended unlimited lines of credit from the U.S. Treasury. The implicit guarantee of the U.S. government and its actions to date support our belief that the U.S. government will honor the obligations of its agencies if the agencies are unable to do so themselves.
The following table is a detailed summary of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2015:2017:
| | | (Amounts in millions, except percentages and financial institutions) | Number of Financial Institutions(1) | | Amount | | Percent of Investment Portfolio | Number of Financial Institutions(1) | | Amount | | Percent of Investment Portfolio |
| Cash held on-hand at owned retail locations | N/A |
| | $ | 4.9 |
| | — | % | N/A |
| | $ | 0.4 |
| | — | % |
| Cash equivalents collateralized by securities issued by U.S. government agencies | 2 |
| | 7.9 |
| | — | % | 3 |
| | 9.2 |
| | — | % |
| Available-for-sale investments issued or collateralized by U.S. government agencies | N/A |
| | 9.5 |
| | — | % | |
| Available-for-sale investments issued by U.S. government agencies | | N/A |
| | 5.6 |
| | — | % |
Cash, cash equivalents and interest-bearing investments at institutions rated AAA(2) | | 1 |
| | 30.2 |
| | 1 | % |
| Cash, cash equivalents and interest-bearing investments at institutions rated AA | 12 |
| | 1,400.7 |
| | 50 | % | 5 |
| | 696.7 |
| | 25 | % |
| Cash, cash equivalents and interest-bearing investments at institutions rated A | 6 |
| | 1,004.3 |
| | 36 | % | 12 |
| | 1,455.1 |
| | 52 | % |
| Cash, cash equivalents and interest-bearing investments at institutions rated BBB | 2 |
| | 4.7 |
| | — | % | 1 |
| | 1.7 |
| | — | % |
| Cash, cash equivalents and interest-bearing investments at institutions rated below BBB | 8 |
| | 73.8 |
| | 3 | % | 3 |
| | 54.2 |
| | 2 | % |
| Other asset-backed securities | N/A |
| | 11.6 |
| | — | % | |
| Asset-backed and other securities | | N/A |
| | 1.4 |
| | — | % |
| Investment portfolio held within the U.S. | 30 |
| | 2,517.4 |
| | 89 | % | 25 |
| | 2,254.5 |
| | 80 | % |
| Cash held on-hand at owned retail locations | N/A |
| | 23.7 |
| | 1 | % | N/A |
| | 24.6 |
| | 1 | % |
| Cash, cash equivalents and interest-bearing investments held at institutions rated AA | 7 |
| | 137.2 |
| | 5 | % | 5 |
| | 60.1 |
| | 2 | % |
| Cash, cash equivalents and interest-bearing investments at institutions rated A | 11 |
| | 30.1 |
| | 1 | % | 17 |
| | 417.7 |
| | 15 | % |
| Cash, cash equivalents and interest-bearing investments at institutions rated below A | 43 |
| | 100.3 |
| | 4 | % | 50 |
| | 64.2 |
| | 2 | % |
| Investment portfolio held outside the U.S. | 61 |
| | 291.3 |
| | 11 | % | 72 |
| | 566.6 |
| | 20 | % |
| Total investment portfolio | | | $ | 2,808.7 |
| | 100 | % | | | $ | 2,821.1 |
| | 100 | % |
(1) Financial institutions, located both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S., are included in each of their respective total number of financial institutions.
(2) Inclusive of deposits with FDIC-insured institutions and where such deposits are fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
At December 31, 2015,2017, all but $11.6$1.4 million of the investment portfolio is invested in cash, cash equivalents, interest-bearing investments and investments issued or collateralized by U.S. government agencies. Approximately 98 percent99% of the portfolio is invested in cash, cash equivalents and interest-bearing investments, with 89 percent80% of our total investment portfolio invested at financial institutions located within the U.S.
Receivables — We have credit exposure to receivables from our agents through the money transfer, bill payment and money order settlement process. These receivables originate from independent agents who collect funds from consumers who are transferring money or buying money orders, and agents who receive proceeds from us in anticipation of payment to the recipients of money transfers. Agents typically have from one to three days to remit the funds, with longer remittance schedules granted to certain agents on a limited basis. The Company has a credit risk management function that conducts the underwriting of credit on new agents as well as conducting credit surveillance on all agents to monitor their financial health and the history of settlement activity with us. The Company’s credit risk management function also maintains daily contact with agents, and performs a collection function. For the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2015,2017, our annual credit losses from agents, as a percentage of total fee and other revenue, was 1 percent.1%. As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had credit exposure to our agents of $652.1$549.0 million in the aggregate spread across 15,88814,344 agents, of which fourthree agents, individually, owed us in excess of $15.0 million.
In addition, we are exposed to credit risk directly from consumer transactions particularly through our Digital/Self-ServiceDigital solutions, where transactions are originated through means other than cash, and therefore are subject to credit card chargebacks, insufficient funds or other collection impediments, such as fraud. As the Digital/Self-ServiceDigital solutions become a greater proportion of our money transfer business, these losses may increase.
We also have credit exposure to receivables from our financial institution customers for business conducted by the Financial Paper Products segment. Financial institutions will collect proceeds for official checks and money orders and remit those proceeds to us. We actively monitor the credit risk associated with financial institutions such as banks and credit unions, and have not incurred any losses associated with the failure or merger of any bank or non-bank financial institution customer. As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had a credit exposure to our official check and money order financial institution customers of $265.0$293.7 million in the aggregate spread across 904923 financial institutions, of which one owed us in excess of $15.0 million.
With respect to our credit union customers, our credit exposure is partially mitigated by National Credit Union Administration insurance and we have required certain credit union customers to provide us with larger balances on deposit and/or to issue cashier’s checks only. While the value of these assets are not at risk in a disruption or collapse of a counterparty financial institution, the delay in accessing our assets could adversely affect our liquidity and potentially our earnings depending upon the severity of the delay and corrective actions we may need to take.
While the extent of credit risk may vary by product, the process for mitigating risk is similar. We assess the creditworthiness of each potential agent before accepting them into our distribution network. This underwriting process includes not only a determination of whether to accept a new agent, but also the remittance schedule and volume of transactions that the agent will be allowed to perform in a given timeframe. We actively monitor the credit risk of our existing agents by conducting periodic financial reviews and cash flow analyses of our agents that average high volumes of transactions and monitoring remittance patterns versus reported sales on a daily basis.
The timely remittance of funds by our agents and financial institution customers is an important component of our liquidity. If the timing of the remittance of funds were to deteriorate, it would alter our pattern of cash flows and could require us to liquidate investments or utilize our Revolving Credit Facility to settle payment service obligations. To manage this risk, we closely monitor the remittance patterns of our agents and financial institution customers and act quickly if we detect deterioration or alteration in remittance timing or patterns. If deemed appropriate, we have the ability to immediately deactivate an agent’s equipment at any time, thereby preventing the initiation or issuance of further money transfers and money orders.
Credit risk management is complemented through functionality within our point-of-sale system, which can enforce credit limits on a real-time basis. The system also permits us to remotely disable an agent’s terminals and cause a cessation of transactions.
Derivative Financial Instruments — Credit risk related to our derivative financial instruments relates to the risk that we are unable to collect amounts owed to us by the counterparties to our derivative agreements. Our derivative financial instruments are used to manage exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. If the counterparties to any of our derivative financial instruments were to default on payments, it could result in a delay or interruption of payments to our agents. We manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments by entering into agreements with only major banks and regularly monitoring the credit ratings of these banks. See Note 65 — Derivative Financial Instruments of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosure.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk represents the risk that our operating results are negatively impacted, and our investment portfolio declines in value, due to changes in interest rates. Given the short maturity profile of the investment portfolio and the low level of interest rates, we believe there is an extremely low risk that the value of these securities would decline such that we would have a material adverse change in our operating results. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company held $372.3$208.1 million, or 13 percent,7%, of the investment portfolio in fixed rate investments.
At December 31, 2015, the Company’s other asset-backed securities are priced on average at $0.04 per dollar of par value for a total fair value of $11.6 million. Included in other asset-backed securities are collateralized debt obligations backed primarily by high-grade debt, mezzanine equity tranches of collateralized debt obligations and home equity loans, along with private equity investments. Any resulting adverse movement in our stockholders’ deficit or settlement assets from declines in investments would not result in regulatory or contractual compliance exceptions.
Our operating results are impacted by interest rate risk through our net investment margin, which is investment revenue less investment commissions expense. As the money transfer business is not materially affected by investment revenue and pays commissions that are not tied to an interest rate index, interest rate risk has the most impact on our money order and official check businesses. We are invested primarily in interest-bearing deposit accounts, non-interest bearing transaction accounts, money market funds backed by U.S. government money market securities, time deposits and certificates of deposit. These types of investments have minimal risk of declines in fair value from changes in interest rates. Our commissions paid to financial institution customers are determined using a variable rate based primarily on the federal funds effective rate and are reset daily. Accordingly, both our investment revenue and our investment commissions expense will decrease when rates decline and increase when rates rise. In the current environment, the federal funds effective rate is so low that many of our financial institution customers are in a “negative” commission position, and therefore, we do not owe any commissions to these customers.
Our results are impacted by interest rate risk through our interest expense for borrowings under the 2013 Credit Agreement. The Company may elect an interest rate for its debt under the 2013 Credit Agreement at each reset period based on the BOA prime bank rate or the Eurodollar rate. The interest rate election may be made individually for the Term Credit Facility and each draw under the Revolving Credit Facility. The interest rate will be either the “alternate base rate” (calculated in part based on the BOA prime rate) plus either 200 or 225 basis points (depending on the Company's secured leverage ratio or total leverage ratio, as applicable, at such time) or the Eurodollar rate plus either 300 or 325 basis points (depending on the Company's secured leverage ratio or total leverage ratio, as applicable, at such time). In connection with the initial funding under the 2013 Credit Agreement,
the Company elected the Eurodollar rate as its primary interest basis. Under the terms of the 2013 Credit Agreement, the minimum interest rate applicable to Eurodollar borrowings under the Term Credit Facility is 100 basis points plus the applicable margins previously referred to in this paragraph. Accordingly, any increases in interest rates will adversely affect interest expense.
The tables below incorporate substantially all of our interest rate sensitive assets and assumptions that reflect changes in all interest rates pertaining to the balance sheet. The “ramp” analysis assumes that interest rates change in even increments over the next 12 months. The “shock” analysis assumes interest rates change immediately and remain at the changed level for the next twelve months. Components of our pre-tax income (loss) income that are interest rate sensitive include “Investment revenue,” “Investment commissions expense” and “Interest expense.” In the current interest rate environment where rates have been historically low, our risk associated with interest rates is not material. A moderately rising interest rate environment would be generally beneficial to the Company because variable rate assets exceed our variable rate liabilities, and certain of our variable rate liabilities will not react to increases in interest rates until those rates exceed the floor set for the index rate on the corresponding debt.
The following table summarizes the changes to affected components of the income statement under various ramp scenarios as of December 31, 2015:2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Basis Point Change in Interest Rates |
| | Down | | Down | | Down | | Up | | Up | | Up |
(Amounts in millions) | 200 | | 100 | | 50 | | 50 | | 100 | | 200 |
| Investment revenue | $ | (7.6 | ) | | $ | (6.6 | ) | | $ | (4.6 | ) | | $ | 5.8 |
| | $ | 11.6 |
| | $ | 23.2 |
|
| Investment commissions expense | 2.1 |
| | 1.9 |
| | 1.5 |
| | (2.0 | ) | | (4.5 | ) | | (11.4 | ) |
| Interest expense | NM |
| | NM |
| | NM |
| | NM |
| | (1.2 | ) | | (4.5 | ) |
| Change in pretax income | $ | (5.5 | ) | | $ | (4.7 | ) | | $ | (3.1 | ) | | $ | 3.8 |
| | $ | 5.9 |
| | $ | 7.3 |
|
NM = Not meaningful |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Basis Point Change in Interest Rates |
| | Down | | Down | | Down | | Up | | Up | | Up |
(Amounts in millions) | 200 | | 100 | | 50 | | 50 | | 100 | | 200 |
| Investment revenue | $ | (20.5 | ) | | $ | (12.3 | ) | | $ | (6.2 | ) | | $ | 6.2 |
| | $ | 12.3 |
| | $ | 24.7 |
|
| Investment commissions expense | 10.0 |
| | 6.4 |
| | 3.4 |
| | (3.5 | ) | | (7.0 | ) | | (14.1 | ) |
| Interest expense | 4.5 |
| | 3.5 |
| | 1.9 |
| | (1.9 | ) | | (3.7 | ) | | (7.4 | ) |
| Change in pretax income | $ | (6.0 | ) | | $ | (2.4 | ) | | $ | (0.9 | ) | | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | 3.2 |
|
The following table summarizes the changes to affected components of the income statement under various shock scenarios as of December 31, 2015:2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Basis Point Change in Interest Rates |
| | Down | | Down | | Down | | Up | | Up | | Up |
| (Amounts in millions) | 200 | | 100 | | 50 | | 50 | | 100 | | 200 |
| Investment revenue | $ | (8.3 | ) | | $ | (8.3 | ) | | $ | (7.7 | ) | | $ | 10.7 |
| | $ | 21.3 |
| | $ | 42.5 |
|
| Investment commissions expense | 2.3 |
| | 2.3 |
| | 2.2 |
| | (3.9 | ) | | (9.7 | ) | | (23.5 | ) |
| Interest expense | NM |
| | NM |
| | NM |
| | (0.8 | ) | | (4.5 | ) | | (11.8 | ) |
| Change in pretax income | $ | (6.0 | ) | | $ | (6.0 | ) | | $ | (5.5 | ) | | $ | 6.0 |
| | $ | 7.1 |
| | $ | 7.2 |
|
NM = Not meaningful |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Basis Point Change in Interest Rates |
| | Down | | Down | | Down | | Up | | Up | | Up |
| (Amounts in millions) | 200 | | 100 | | 50 | | 50 | | 100 | | 200 |
| Investment revenue | $ | (30.6 | ) | | $ | (22.8 | ) | | $ | (11.6 | ) | | $ | 11.6 |
| | $ | 23.1 |
| | $ | 46.3 |
|
| Investment commissions expense | 12.8 |
| | 10.3 |
| | 5.7 |
| | (6.1 | ) | | (12.0 | ) | | (24.2 | ) |
| Interest expense | 4.8 |
| | 4.8 |
| | 3.4 |
| | (3.4 | ) | | (6.9 | ) | | (13.7 | ) |
| Change in pretax income | $ | (13.0 | ) | | $ | (7.7 | ) | | $ | (2.5 | ) | | $ | 2.1 |
| | $ | 4.2 |
| | $ | 8.4 |
|
Foreign Currency Risk
We are exposed to foreign currency risk in the ordinary course of business as we offer our products and services through a network of agents and financial institutions with locations in more than 200 countries and territories. By policy, we do not speculate in foreign currencies; all currency trades relate to underlying transactional exposures.
Our primary source of foreign exchange risk is transactional risk. This risk is predominantly incurred in the money transfer business in which funds are frequently transferred cross-border and we settle with agents in multiple currencies. Although this risk is somewhat limited due to the fact that these transactions are short-term in nature, we currently manage some of this risk with forward contracts to protect against potential short-term market volatility. The primary currency pairs, based on volume, that are traded against the U.S. dollar in the spot and forward markets include the European euro, Mexican peso, British pound and Indian rupee. The tenor of forward contracts is typically less than 30 days.
Realized and unrealized gains or losses on transactional currency and any associated revaluation of balance sheet exposures are recorded in “Transaction and operations support” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair market value of any open forward contracts at period end are recorded in “Other assets” or "Accounts payable and other liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net effect of changes in foreign exchange rates and the related forward contracts for the year ended December 31, 20152017 was a gain of $11.4$7.5 million.
Additional foreign currency risk is generated from fluctuations in the U.S. dollar value of future foreign currency-denominated earnings. In 2015,2017, fluctuations in the euro exchange rate (net of transactional hedging activities) resulted in a net decreaseincrease to our operating income of $9.0$1.6 million.
In 2015,2017, the euro was our second largest currency position in the world following the U.S. dollar. Had the euro appreciated or depreciated relative to the U.S. dollar by 20 percent20% from actual exchange rates for 2015,2017, operating income would have increased/decreased approximately $9.5$14.0 million for the year. There are inherent limitations in this sensitivity analysis, primarily due to the assumption that foreign exchange rate movements are linear and instantaneous, that the unhedged exposure is static and that we would not hedge any additional exposure. As a result, the analysis is unable to reflect the potential effects of more complex market changes that could arise, which may positively or negatively affect income.
Translation risk is generated from the accounting translation of the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries (from their functional currency) into U.S. dollars for consolidation and does not have a significant impact on company results. These translation adjustments are recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The information called for by Item 8 is found in a separate section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K starting on pages F-1. See the “Index to Financial Statements” on page F-1.
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed, without limitation, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As required by Rule 13a-15(d), the Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, also conducted an evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. During the quarter ended December 31, 2015, the Company implemented a change in internal control over financial reporting. This change remediated a material weakness related to the operating effectiveness of a control that is designed to identify new balance sheet accounts within the Company’s reconciliation software tool, ensuring that a reconciler and reviewer are appropriately assigned. The material weakness began in August 2015 and was both identified and remediated in December 2015. The Company has reconciled all accounts as of December 31, 2015. The deficiency in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting did not result in any material misstatements in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The testing of the additional control process outlined above has been completed and the Company’s management has concluded that the material weakness was remediated as of December 31, 2015. Other than as described above, thereThere were no changes in the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20152017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting is provided on page F-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & ToucheKPMG LLP, regarding the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is provided on page F-3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
On March 2, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors amended the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (the “Amendment”), which became effective immediately and amends Section 3.11 solely to also permit stockholders to remove directors without cause. The foregoing description of the Amendment is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Amendment, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 3.6 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein.None.
Article VIII(E) of the Company’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, contains a provision similar to the amended portion of Section 3.11 of the Amended and Restated Bylaws, as it read prior to the Amendment. In light of a recent ruling by the Delaware Chancery Court, the Company will not attempt to enforce Article VIII(E) to the extent that it does not permit removal of directors without cause.
PART III
Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information called for by this Item is contained in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Executive“Executive Officers of the Registrant”Registrant” and in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
All of our employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller, or persons performing similar functions, also referred to as the Principal Officers, are subject to our Code of Conduct. Our directors are also subject to our Code of Conduct. These documents are posted on our website at corporate.moneygram.com in the Investor Relations section, and are available in print free of charge to any stockholder who requests them at the address set forth in Item 1 – Available Information of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We will disclose any amendments to, or waivers of, our Code of Conduct for directors or Principal Officers on our website. The information on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER. MATTERS
The information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information called for by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
| |
| (a) (1) | The financial statements listed in the “Index to Financial Statements” are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
| (2) | All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto listed in the “Index to Financial Statements.” |
| (3) | Exhibits are filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K or incorporated herein by reference as listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| (b) (1) | | | | | |
| | | MoneyGram International, Inc. |
| | | (Registrant) |
| | | |
Date: | March 2, 2016 | | By: | | /S/ W. ALEXANDER HOLMES
|
| | | | | W. Alexander Holmes |
| | | | | DirectorThe following exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference herein in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K. The Company files Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | |
/s/ W. Alexander Holmes | | Director and Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| | March 2, 2016 |
W. Alexander Holmes | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Pamela H. Patsley | | Executive Chairman | | March 2, 2016 |
Pamela H. Patsley | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Lawrence Angelilli | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
| | March 2, 2016 |
Lawrence Angelilli | | |
| | |
/s/ John D. Stoneham | | Vice President and Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) | | March 2, 2016 |
John D. Stoneham | | |
|
| | | | |
| Directors | | | |
| | | | |
| J. Coley Clark | | Seth W. Lawry | |
| Victor W. Dahir | | Ganesh B. Rao | |
| Antonio O. Garza | | W. Bruce Turner | |
| Peggy Vaughan
| | | |
|
| | | | | | |
By: | | /s/ F. Aaron Henry | | | | March 2, 2016 |
| | F. Aaron Henry | | | | |
| | Attorney-in-fact | | | | Current Reports on Form 8-K pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 under Commission File No. 1-31950. |
57
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
| 2.1 | | |
| 2.2 | | |
| 2.3 | | |
| 2.4 | | |
| 2.5 | | |
| 2.6 | | |
| 3.1 | | |
| 3.2 | | |
| 3.3 | | |
| 3.4 | | |
| 3.5 | | |
*3.6 | | |
| 3.7 | | |
| 4.1 | | |
| 4.2 | | |
| 4.3 | | |
| 10.1 | | |
| 10.2 | | |
| †10.3 | | |
|
| | |
| †10.8 | | |
| †10.9 | | |
| †10.10 | | |
| †10.11 | | |
| †10.12 | | |
| 10.13 | | |
| 10.14 | | Amended and Restated Fee Arrangement Letter, dated March 17, 2008, between THL Managers VI, LLC and MoneyGram International, Inc. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 18, 2008). |
10.15 | | Amended and Restated Fee Arrangement Letter, dated March 17, 2008, between Goldman, Sachs & Co. and MoneyGram International, Inc. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 18, 2008). |
10.16 | | Fee Arrangement Letter, dated as of March 25, 2008, by and between the Investor parties named therein, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and MoneyGram International, Inc. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 28, 2008). |
10.17 | | |
10.18†10.15 | | Amended and Restated Fee Letter, dated March 17, 2008, among MoneyGram Payment Systems Worldwide, Inc., GSMP V Onshore US, Ltd., GSMP V Offshore US, Ltd., GSMP V Institutional US, Ltd., GS Capital Partners VI Fund, L.P., GS Capital Partners VI Offshore Fund, L.P., GS Capital Partners VI GmbH & Co. KG, GS Capital Partners VI Parallel, L.P., and THL Managers VI, LLC (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 18, 2008). |
†10.19 | | |
†10.2010.16 | | |
†10.2110.17 | | |
†10.2210.18 | | |
†10.2310.19 | | |
†10.2410.20 | | |
†10.2510.21 | | |
†10.2610.22 | | |
†10.2710.23 | | |
†10.2810.24 | | |
|
| | |
†10.2910.25 | | |
†10.3010.26 | | |
†10.3110.27 | | |
†10.3210.28 | | |
†10.3310.29 | | |
†10.3410.30 | | |
†10.3510.31 | | |
†10.3610.32 | | |
†10.3710.33 | | |
†10.3810.34 | | |
†10.3910.35 | | |
†10.4010.36 | | |
†10.4110.37 | | |
†10.4210.38 | | |
†10.4310.39 | | |
†10.4410.40 | | Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements, revised to be effective as of January 1, 2014 (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.53 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 3, 2014). |
†10.45 | | |
†10.4610.41 | | |
10.4710.42 | | |
†10.4810.43 | | |
+10.4910.44 | | |
10.5010.45 | | Guaranty, dated as of May 18, 2011, among MoneyGram International, Inc., MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc., MoneyGram of New York LLC, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 23, 2011). |
|
| | |
10.5110.46 | | Pledge Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2011, among MoneyGram International, Inc., MoneyGram Payment Systems Worldwide, Inc., MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc., MoneyGram of New York LLC, and Bank of America, N.A., as collateral agent (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 23, 2011). |
10.5210.47 | | Security Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2011, among MoneyGram International, Inc., MoneyGram Payment Systems Worldwide, Inc., MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc., MoneyGram of New York LLC, and Bank of America, N.A., as collateral agent (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 23, 2011). |
10.5310.48 | | |
10.5410.49 | | |
10.5510.50 | | |
10.5610.51 | | |
10.5710.52 | | |
10.5810.53 | | |
+10.5910.54 | | First Incremental Amendment and Joinder Agreement, dated April 2, 2014, by and among MoneyGram International, Inc., as borrower, MoneyGram Payment Systems Worldwide, Inc., MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc., and MoneyGram of New York LLC, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and the financial institutions party thereto as Lenders (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 2, 2014). |
10.6010.55 | | |
10.6110.56 | | |
10.6210.57 | | |
10.6310.58 | | |
10.6410.59 | | |
†10.6510.60 | | |
†10.6610.61 | | |
†10.6710.62 | | |
†10.6810.63 | | |
|
| | |
†10.6910.64 | | |
*†10.7010.65 | | |
10.7110.66 | | Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise and Settlement, dated as of July 19, 2012, by and among the plaintiffs and class representatives party thereto, MoneyGram International, Inc., Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P., The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and certain individual defendants party thereto (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 9, 2012). |
10.7210.67 | | Supplemental Agreement Regarding Settlement, dated as of July 20, 2012, by and among MoneyGram International, Inc., Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P., The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., certain individual defendants party thereto, and Federal Insurance Company (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 9, 2012). |
+10.7310.68 | | |
10.74+10.69 | | Letter Agreement, effective as of September 30, 2015, amending the |
| +10.70 | | |
| 10.71 | | |
| 10.72 | | |
| 10.73 | | |
| 10.74 | | |
| 10.75 | | |
*10.75 | | Letter Agreement, effective December 23, 2015, amending the Master Trust Agreement dated September 30, 2012, as amended, by and between MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
†10.76 | | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2013, by and between MoneyGram International, Inc. and Pamela H. Patsley, as amended by Amendment No. |
| 10.77 | | Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2013, by and among MoneyGram Payment Systems Worldwide, Inc., GSMP V Onshore US, Ltd., GSMP V Offshore US, Ltd. and GSMP V Institutional US, Ltd. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 28, 2013). |
| 10.78 | | |
| †10.79 | | |
| †10.80 | | |
| †10.81 | | Form of MoneyGram International, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan Global Long-Term Incentive Cash Performance Award Agreement (for one-time contingent performance awards) (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 3, 2013). |
†10.82 | | Form of MoneyGram International, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan Global Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (for one-time contingent performance awards) (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.8 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 3, 2013). |
†10.83 | | |
†10.8410.82 | | Form of MoneyGram International, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan Global Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 2, 2014). |
†10.85 | | Form of MoneyGram International, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan Global Stock Appreciation Right Agreement (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 2, 2014). |
†10.86 | | Form of MoneyGram International, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan Global Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 2, 2014). |
†10.87 | | Form of MoneyGram International, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan Global Stock Option Agreement (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 2, 2014). |
†10.88 | | Global Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated February 24, 2014, between MoneyGram International, Inc. and Pamela H. Patsley (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 2, 2014). |
|
| | |
†10.89 | | Global Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated February 24, 2014, between MoneyGram International, Inc. and Pamela H. Patsley (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.8 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 2, 2014). |
†10.90 | | Form of 2014 Cash Retention Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.93 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 3, 2015). |
†10.91 | | 2014 Cash Retention Award Agreement, dated December 10, 2014, between MoneyGram International, Inc. and Pamela H. Patsley (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.94 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 3, 2015). |
†10.92 | | Form of MoneyGram International, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan 2015 Global Time-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 4, 2015). |
†10.9310.83 | | |
|
| | |
†10.9410.84 | | |
†10.9510.85 | | |
†10.9610.86 | | |
†10.9710.87 | | |
| †10.88 | | |
| †10.89 | | |
| †10.90 | | |
| †10.91 | | |
| †10.92 | | |
| †10.93 | | |
| †10.94 | | |
| †10.95 | | |
| †10.96 | | |
| †10.97 | | |
| 10.98 | | |
| 10.99 | | |
| 10.100 | | |
| 10.101 | | |
| 10.102 | | |
| 10.103 | | |
| 10.104 | | |
|
| | |
| 10.105 | | |
| 10.106 | | |
| +10.107 | | |
| 10.108 | | |
| *21 | | |
*2323.1 | | |
| *23.2 | | |
| *24 | | |
| *31.1 | | |
| *31.2 | | |
| *32.1 | | |
| *32.2 | | |
| *101 | | The following financial statements, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20152017 and December 31, 2014;2016; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013;2015; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013;2015; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013;2015; (v) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit as of December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013;2015, and (vi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
| | |
| † | | Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report. |
|
| | |
| + | | Confidential information has been omitted from this Exhibit and has been filed separately with the SEC pursuant to a confidential treatment request under Rule 24b-2. |
Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | | | |
| | | MoneyGram International, Inc. |
| | | (Registrant) |
| | | |
| Date: | March 16, 2018 | | By: | | /S/ W. ALEXANDER HOLMES |
| | | | | W. Alexander Holmes |
| | | | | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | |
| /s/ W. Alexander Holmes | | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | | March 16, 2018 |
| W. Alexander Holmes | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Lawrence Angelilli | | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | | March 16, 2018 |
| Lawrence Angelilli | | |
| | |
| /s/ John D. Stoneham | | Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) | | March 16, 2018 |
| John D. Stoneham | | |
|
| | | | |
| Directors | | | |
| | | | |
| J. Coley Clark | | Seth W. Lawry | |
| Victor W. Dahir | | Ganesh B. Rao | |
| Antonio O. Garza | | W. Bruce Turner | |
| Peggy Vaughan | | Michael Rafferty | |
|
| | | | | | |
| By: | | /s/ F. Aaron Henry | | | | March 16, 2018 |
| | F. Aaron Henry | | | | |
| | Attorney-in-fact | | | | |
MoneyGram International, Inc.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
Items 8 and 15(a)
Index to Financial Statements
Management’s Responsibility Statement
The management of MoneyGram International, Inc. is responsible for the integrity, objectivity and accuracy of the consolidated financial statements of the Company. The consolidated financial statements are prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America using, where appropriate, management’s best estimates and judgments. The financial information presented throughout the Annual Report is consistent with that in the consolidated financial statements.
Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal controls and procedures over financial reporting designed to provide reasonable assurance that the books and records reflect the transactions of the Company and that assets are protected against loss from unauthorized use or disposition. Such a system is maintained through accounting policies and procedures administered by trained Company personnel and updated on a continuing basis to ensure their adequacy to meet the changing requirements of our business. The Company requires that all of its affairs, as reflected by the actions of its employees, be conducted according to the highest standards of personal and business conduct. This responsibility is reflected in our Code of Ethics.
To test compliance with the Company’s system of internal controls and procedures over financial reporting, the Company carries out an extensive audit program. This program includes a review for compliance with written policies and procedures and a comprehensive review of the adequacy and effectiveness of the internal control system. Although control procedures are designed and tested, it must be recognized that there are limits inherent in all systems of internal control and, therefore, errors and irregularities may nevertheless occur. Also, estimates and judgments are required to assess and balance the relative cost and expected benefits of the controls. Projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of outside directors, meets quarterly with management, internal audit and the independent registered public accounting firm to discuss internal accounting control, auditing and financial reporting matters, as well as to determine that the respective parties are properly discharging their responsibilities. Both our independent registered public accounting firm and internal auditors have had and continue to have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee without the presence of management.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.2017. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment and those criteria, management concludedbelieves that the Company’sCompany designed and maintained effective internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015. Management had identified a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting related to the reconciliation of new balance sheet accounts beginning in August 2015, which was both identified and remediated in December 2015. For additional information regarding the nature of this material weakness, see “Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” in Item 9A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.2017.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & ToucheKPMG LLP, has been engaged to audit our financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the effectiveness of the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting.reporting as of December 31, 2017. Their attestation report regarding the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is included on page F-3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders of
MoneyGram International, Inc.:
Dallas, Texas
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited theMoneyGram International, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting of MoneyGram International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2015,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows, and stockholders’ deficit for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related notes, and our report dated March 16, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management'sManagement’s Responsibility Statement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, andrisk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 16, 2018
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
MoneyGram International, Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MoneyGram International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows, and stockholders’ deficit for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the Company maintained,consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, effectivethe financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,2017, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission, and our report dated March 16, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We have also audited,conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United StatesPCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements asare free of and formaterial misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the year ended December 31, 2015risks of material misstatement of the Companyconsolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and our report March 2, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinionperforming procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on thosea test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHEKPMG LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2016.
Dallas, Texas
March 2, 2016
16, 2018
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
MoneyGram International, Inc.
Dallas, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsstatements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and stockholders' deficit of MoneyGram International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, andfor the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, cash flows and stockholders' deficit for each of the three years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thethese financial statements based on our audits.audit.
We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our auditsaudit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such 2015 consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positionresults of operations and cash flows of MoneyGram International, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2015 and 2014, andfor the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 2, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTEDELOITTE & TOUCHETOUCHE LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 2, 2016
Table (March 16, 2017 as to the effects of Contentsthe 2016 immaterial error correction related to foreign exchange revenue disclosed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements; March 16, 2018 as to the effects of the 2017 immaterial error correction related to the pension plan disclosed in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements and the adoption ofASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements)
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | AT DECEMBER 31, | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| (Amounts in millions, except share data) | | | | | | |
| ASSETS | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 164.5 |
| | $ | 250.6 |
| $ | 190.0 |
| | $ | 157.2 |
|
| Settlement assets | 3,505.6 |
| | 3,533.6 |
| 3,756.9 |
| | 3,634.3 |
|
| Property and equipment, net | 199.7 |
| | 165.6 |
| 214.9 |
| | 201.0 |
|
| Goodwill | 442.2 |
| | 442.5 |
| 442.2 |
| | 442.2 |
|
| Other assets | 193.2 |
| | 236.0 |
| 168.5 |
| | 162.7 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 4,505.2 |
| | $ | 4,628.3 |
| $ | 4,772.5 |
| | $ | 4,597.4 |
|
| LIABILITIES | | | | | | |
| Payment service obligations | $ | 3,505.6 |
| | $ | 3,533.6 |
| $ | 3,756.9 |
| | $ | 3,634.3 |
|
| Debt | 942.6 |
| | 949.6 |
| |
| Debt, net | | 908.1 |
| | 915.2 |
|
| Pension and other postretirement benefits | 96.3 |
| | 125.7 |
| 97.3 |
| | 99.0 |
|
| Accounts payable and other liabilities | 183.5 |
| | 202.1 |
| 255.5 |
| | 164.5 |
|
| Total liabilities | 4,728.0 |
| | 4,811.0 |
| 5,017.8 |
| | 4,813.0 |
|
| COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 14) |
|
| |
|
| |
| COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 13) | |
|
| |
|
|
| STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | | | | | | |
| Participating convertible preferred stock - series D, $0.01 par value, 200,000 shares authorized, 71,282 issued at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 | 183.9 |
| | 183.9 |
| |
| Common stock, $0.01 par value, 162,500,000 shares authorized, 58,823,567 shares issued at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 | 0.6 |
| | 0.6 |
| |
| Participating convertible preferred stock - series D, $0.01 par value, 200,000 shares authorized, 71,282 issued at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | | 183.9 |
| | 183.9 |
|
| Common stock, $0.01 par value, 162,500,000 shares authorized, 58,823,567 shares issued at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 | | 0.6 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital | 1,002.4 |
| | 982.8 |
| 1,034.8 |
| | 1,020.3 |
|
| Retained loss | (1,226.8 | ) | | (1,144.6 | ) | (1,336.1 | ) | | (1,252.6 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (48.7 | ) | | (67.1 | ) | (63.0 | ) | | (56.1 | ) |
| Treasury stock: 5,612,188 and 5,734,338 shares at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively | (134.2 | ) | | (138.3 | ) | |
| Treasury stock: 4,585,223 and 6,058,856 shares at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively | | (65.5 | ) | | (111.7 | ) |
| Total stockholders’ deficit | (222.8 | ) | | (182.7 | ) | (245.3 | ) | | (215.6 | ) |
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit | $ | 4,505.2 |
| | $ | 4,628.3 |
| $ | 4,772.5 |
| | $ | 4,597.4 |
|
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| (Amounts in millions, except per share data) | | | | | | | | | | |
| REVENUE | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fee and other revenue | $ | 1,422.6 |
| | $ | 1,438.4 |
| | $ | 1,456.8 |
| $ | 1,560.9 |
| | $ | 1,612.4 |
| | $ | 1,527.0 |
|
| Investment revenue | 12.1 |
| | 16.5 |
| | 17.6 |
| 41.2 |
| | 18.0 |
| | 12.1 |
|
| Total revenue | 1,434.7 |
| | 1,454.9 |
| | 1,474.4 |
| 1,602.1 |
| | 1,630.4 |
| | 1,539.1 |
|
| EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fee and other commissions expense | 655.4 |
| | 666.0 |
| | 677.8 |
| 763.5 |
| | 793.1 |
| | 759.8 |
|
| Investment commissions expense | 0.8 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.4 |
| 8.7 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 0.8 |
|
| Total commissions expense | 656.2 |
| | 666.4 |
| | 678.2 |
| 772.2 |
| | 795.6 |
| | 760.6 |
|
| Compensation and benefits | 309.1 |
| | 275.0 |
| | 264.9 |
| 277.7 |
| | 295.7 |
| | 310.4 |
|
| Transaction and operations support | 324.8 |
| | 332.2 |
| | 253.7 |
| 402.3 |
| | 309.5 |
| | 324.8 |
|
| Occupancy, equipment and supplies | 62.3 |
| | 54.4 |
| | 49.0 |
| 66.1 |
| | 61.9 |
| | 62.3 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 66.1 |
| | 55.5 |
| | 50.7 |
| 75.1 |
| | 79.9 |
| | 66.1 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 1,418.5 |
| | 1,383.5 |
| | 1,296.5 |
| 1,593.4 |
| | 1,542.6 |
| | 1,524.2 |
|
| OPERATING INCOME | 16.2 |
| | 71.4 |
| | 177.9 |
| 8.7 |
| | 87.8 |
| | 14.9 |
|
| Other expenses (income) | | | | | | |
| Net securities gains | — |
| | (45.4 | ) | | — |
| |
| Other expenses | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | 45.3 |
| | 44.2 |
| | 47.3 |
| 45.3 |
| | 45.0 |
| | 45.3 |
|
| Debt extinguishment costs | — |
| | — |
| | 45.3 |
| — |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
|
| Total other expenses (income), net | 45.3 |
| | (1.2 | ) | | 92.6 |
| |
| Total other expenses, net | | 45.3 |
| | 45.3 |
| | 45.3 |
|
| (Loss) income before income taxes | (29.1 | ) | | 72.6 |
| | 85.3 |
| (36.6 | ) | | 42.5 |
| | (30.4 | ) |
| Income tax expense | 47.8 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 32.9 |
| |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | | (6.8 | ) | | 26.6 |
| | 47.3 |
|
| NET (LOSS) INCOME | $ | (76.9 | ) | | $ | 72.1 |
| | $ | 52.4 |
| $ | (29.8 | ) | | $ | 15.9 |
| | $ | (77.7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (LOSS) EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | (1.24 | ) | | $ | 1.10 |
| | $ | 0.73 |
| $ | (0.47 | ) | | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | (1.25 | ) |
| Diluted | $ | (1.24 | ) | | $ | 1.10 |
| | $ | 0.73 |
| $ | (0.47 | ) | | $ | 0.24 |
| | $ | (1.25 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted-average outstanding common shares and equivalents used in computing (loss) earnings per share | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 62.1 |
| | 65.3 |
| | 71.6 |
| 62.9 |
| | 62.3 |
| | 62.1 |
|
| Diluted | 62.1 |
| | 65.5 |
| | 71.9 |
| 62.9 |
| | 65.9 |
| | 62.1 |
|
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| (Amounts in millions) | | | | | |
| NET (LOSS) INCOME | $ | (76.9 | ) | | $ | 72.1 |
| | $ | 52.4 |
|
| OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | | | | | |
| Net change in unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities arising during the period, net of tax (benefit) expense of $0.0, ($0.2) and $4.7 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively | (0.1 | ) | | (6.1 | ) | | 1.0 |
|
| Net change in pension liability due to amortization of prior service cost and net actuarial loss, net of tax benefit of $3.1, $2.5 and $ 2.7 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively | 5.0 |
| | 4.1 |
| | 4.8 |
|
| Valuation adjustment for pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax expense (benefit) of $7.2, ($13.4) and $7.4 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively | 12.7 |
| | (23.2 | ) | | 12.6 |
|
| Pension settlement charges, net of tax benefit of $5.1, $0.0 and $0.0 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively | 8.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax (benefit) expense of ($4.6), ($5.2) and $0.5 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively | (8.1 | ) | | (8.9 | ) | | 0.9 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | 18.4 |
| | (34.1 | ) | | 19.3 |
|
| COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME | $ | (58.5 | ) | | $ | 38.0 |
| | $ | 71.7 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| (Amounts in millions) | | | | | |
| NET (LOSS) INCOME | $ | (29.8 | ) | | $ | 15.9 |
| | $ | (77.7 | ) |
| OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME | | | | | |
| Net change in unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities arising during the period, net of tax benefit of $0.0, $0.1 and $0.0 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively | 3.6 |
| | (0.3 | ) | | (0.1 | ) |
| Net reclassification adjustment for net realized gains included in net earnings, net of tax expense of $0.0 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively | (12.2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Net change in pension liability due to amortization of prior service credit and net actuarial loss, net of tax benefit of $1.6, $2.0 and $3.1 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively | 2.8 |
| | 3.5 |
| | 5.2 |
|
| Valuation adjustment for pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax (benefit) expense of ($4.5), ($1.2) and $7.1 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively | (10.6 | ) | | (2.1 | ) | | 12.5 |
|
| Pension settlement charge, net of tax benefit of $0.0, $0.0 and $5.4 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively | — |
| | — |
| | 9.3 |
|
| Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax (expense) benefit of ($8.0), $1.3 and $4.6 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively | 9.5 |
| | (6.4 | ) | | (8.1 | ) |
| Other comprehensive (loss) income | (6.9 | ) | | (5.3 | ) | | 18.8 |
|
| COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME | $ | (36.7 | ) | | $ | 10.6 |
| | $ | (58.9 | ) |
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| (Amounts in millions) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (76.9 | ) | | $ | 72.1 |
| | $ | 52.4 |
| | $ | (29.8 | ) | | $ | 15.9 |
| | $ | (77.7 | ) |
| Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 66.1 |
| | 55.5 |
| | 50.7 |
| | 75.1 |
| | 79.9 |
| | 66.1 |
|
| Signing bonus amortization | 60.4 |
| | 53.8 |
| | 42.8 |
| | 51.9 |
| | 54.0 |
| | 60.4 |
|
| Provision for deferred income taxes | 25.6 |
| | 5.5 |
| | 12.0 |
| |
| Loss on debt extinguishment | — |
| | — |
| | 45.3 |
| |
| Deferred income tax (benefit) expense | | | (4.9 | ) | | 7.3 |
| | 25.1 |
|
| Gain on redemption of asset-backed security | | | (12.2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs | 2.8 |
| | 3.1 |
| | 3.3 |
| | 3.2 |
| | 3.7 |
| | 2.8 |
|
| Non-cash compensation and pension expense | 45.3 |
| | 15.2 |
| | 20.3 |
| | 20.4 |
| | 25.1 |
| | 46.6 |
|
| Signing bonus payments | (87.3 | ) | | (93.9 | ) | | (45.0 | ) | | (40.3 | ) | | (34.0 | ) | | (87.3 | ) |
| Change in other assets | 27.2 |
| | (34.8 | ) | | 29.2 |
| | (4.6 | ) | | 1.0 |
| | 27.2 |
|
| Change in accounts payable and other liabilities | (29.1 | ) | | (8.3 | ) | | (58.4 | ) | | 70.3 |
| | (31.8 | ) | | (28.6 | ) |
| Other non-cash items, net | (0.5 | ) | | (5.9 | ) | | 3.5 |
| | 3.4 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | (0.5 | ) |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 33.6 |
| | 62.3 |
| | 156.1 |
| | 132.5 |
| | 120.9 |
| | 34.1 |
|
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | (109.9 | ) | | (85.8 | ) | | (48.8 | ) | | (83.6 | ) | | (82.8 | ) | | (109.9 | ) |
| Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired | — |
| | (11.5 | ) | | (15.4 | ) | |
| Proceeds from disposal of assets | 0.4 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 0.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.4 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (109.5 | ) | | (96.4 | ) | | (63.5 | ) | | (83.6 | ) | | (82.8 | ) | | (109.5 | ) |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of debt | — |
| | 129.8 |
| | 850.0 |
| |
| Transaction costs for issuance and amendment of debt | — |
| | (5.1 | ) | | (11.8 | ) | |
| Principal payments on debt | (9.8 | ) | | (9.5 | ) | | (819.5 | ) | | (9.8 | ) | | (30.3 | ) | | (9.8 | ) |
| Prepayment penalty | — |
| | — |
| | (21.5 | ) | |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | — |
| | 0.4 |
| | 1.1 |
| |
| Stock repurchase | (0.4 | ) | | (149.7 | ) | | — |
| |
| Stock repurchases | | | — |
| | (11.7 | ) | | (0.4 | ) |
| Contingent consideration payment | | | — |
| | (0.7 | ) | | — |
|
| Payments to tax authorities for stock-based compensation | | | (8.0 | ) | | (2.7 | ) | | (0.5 | ) |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options and other | | | 1.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net cash used in financing activities | (10.2 | ) | | (34.1 | ) | | (1.7 | ) | | (16.1 | ) | | (45.4 | ) | | (10.7 | ) |
| NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | (86.1 | ) | | (68.2 | ) | | 90.9 |
| | 32.8 |
| | (7.3 | ) | | (86.1 | ) |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period | 250.6 |
| | 318.8 |
| | 227.9 |
| |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period | $ | 164.5 |
| | $ | 250.6 |
| | $ | 318.8 |
| |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of year | | | 157.2 |
| | 164.5 |
| | 250.6 |
|
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of year | | | $ | 190.0 |
| | $ | 157.2 |
| | $ | 164.5 |
|
| Supplemental cash flow information: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash payments for interest | $ | 42.1 |
| | $ | 41.1 |
| | $ | 43.9 |
| | $ | 41.9 |
| | $ | 41.6 |
| | $ | 42.1 |
|
| Change in accrued purchases of property and equipment | (9.5 | ) | | 2.1 |
| | 7.9 |
| |
| Cash payments for income taxes | $ | 69.8 |
| | $ | 6.4 |
| | $ | 8.0 |
| |
| Cash refunds for income taxes | (5.4 | ) | | — |
| | (0.8 | ) | |
| Cash taxes, net | $ | 64.4 |
| | $ | 6.4 |
| | $ | 7.2 |
| |
| Cash payments for taxes, net of refunds | | | $ | 5.0 |
| | $ | 9.5 |
| | $ | 64.4 |
|
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Preferred Stock | | Common Stock | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Retained Loss | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Treasury Stock | | Total |
| January 1, 2013 | $ | 281.9 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 1,001.0 |
| | $ | (1,265.9 | ) | | $ | (52.3 | ) | | $ | (126.7 | ) | | $ | (161.4 | ) |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 52.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 52.4 |
|
| Stock-based compensation activity | — |
| | — |
| | 10.5 |
| | (0.9 | ) | | — |
| | 2.8 |
| | 12.4 |
|
| Capital contribution from Investors | — |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Net change in unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1.0 |
| | — |
| | 1.0 |
|
| Pension valuation, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12.6 |
| | — |
| | 12.6 |
|
| Net change in pension liability, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4.8 |
| | — |
| | 4.8 |
|
| Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.9 |
| | — |
| | 0.9 |
|
| December 31, 2013 | 281.9 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 1,011.8 |
| | (1,214.4 | ) | | (33.0 | ) | | (123.9 | ) | | (77.0 | ) |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 72.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 72.1 |
|
| Stock-based compensation activity | — |
| | — |
| | 5.4 |
| | (2.3 | ) | | — |
| | 2.3 |
| | 5.4 |
|
Capital contribution from Investors
| — |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Repurchase and retirement of shares | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | (132.9 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (133.0 | ) |
| Conversion of Series D convertible shares | (98.0 | ) | | 0.1 |
| | 97.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Stock repurchase | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (16.7 | ) | | (16.7 | ) |
| Net change in unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (6.1 | ) | | — |
| | (6.1 | ) |
| Pension valuation, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (23.2 | ) | | — |
| | (23.2 | ) |
| Net change in pension liability, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4.1 |
| | — |
| | 4.1 |
|
| Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8.9 | ) | | — |
| | (8.9 | ) |
| December 31, 2014 | 183.9 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 982.8 |
| | (1,144.6 | ) | | (67.1 | ) | | (138.3 | ) | | (182.7 | ) |
| Net loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (76.9 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (76.9 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation activity | — |
| | — |
| | 19.6 |
| | (5.3 | ) | | — |
| | 4.5 |
| �� | 18.8 |
|
| Stock repurchase | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (0.4 | ) | | (0.4 | ) |
| Net change in unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax | — |
| |
|
| | — |
| | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | — |
| | (0.1 | ) |
| Pension settlement charge, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8.9 |
| | — |
| | 8.9 |
|
| Pension valuation, net of tax | — |
| | | | — |
| | — |
| | 12.7 |
| | — |
| | 12.7 |
|
| Net change in pension liability, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | | | — |
| | 5.0 |
| | — |
| | 5.0 |
|
| Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8.1 | ) | | — |
| | (8.1 | ) |
| December 31, 2015 | $ | 183.9 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 1,002.4 |
| | $ | (1,226.8 | ) | | $ | (48.7 | ) | | $ | (134.2 | ) | | $ | (222.8 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Preferred Stock | | Common Stock | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Retained Loss | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Treasury Stock | | Total |
| January 1, 2015 | $ | 183.9 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 982.8 |
| | $ | (1,144.6 | ) | | $ | (67.1 | ) | | $ | (138.3 | ) | | $ | (182.7 | ) |
| Prior period pension adjustment | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3.8 | ) | | (2.5 | ) | | — |
| | (6.3 | ) |
| Net loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (77.7 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (77.7 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation activity | — |
| | — |
| | 19.6 |
| | (5.3 | ) | | — |
| | 4.5 |
| | 18.8 |
|
| Stock repurchase | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (0.4 | ) | | (0.4 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18.8 |
| | — |
| | 18.8 |
|
| December 31, 2015 | 183.9 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 1,002.4 |
| | (1,231.4 | ) | | (50.8 | ) | | (134.2 | ) | | (229.5 | ) |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15.9 |
|
| Stock-based compensation activity | — |
| | — |
| | 17.9 |
| | (37.1 | ) | | — |
| | 34.2 |
| | 15.0 |
|
| Stock repurchase | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11.7 | ) | | (11.7 | ) |
| Other comprehensive loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (5.3 | ) | | — |
| | (5.3 | ) |
| December 31, 2016 | 183.9 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 1,020.3 |
| | (1,252.6 | ) | | (56.1 | ) | | (111.7 | ) | | (215.6 | ) |
| Net loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (29.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (29.8 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation activity | — |
| | — |
| | 14.5 |
| | (53.7 | ) | | — |
| | 46.2 |
| | 7.0 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (6.9 | ) | | — |
| | (6.9 | ) |
| December 31, 2017 | $ | 183.9 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 1,034.8 |
| | $ | (1,336.1 | ) | | $ | (63.0 | ) | | $ | (65.5 | ) | | $ | (245.3 | ) |
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 — Description of the Business and Basis of Presentation
References to “MoneyGram,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” are to MoneyGram International, Inc. and its subsidiaries and consolidated entities.subsidiaries.
Nature of Operations — MoneyGram offers products and services under its two reporting segments: Global Funds Transfer ("GFT") and Financial Paper Products ("FPP").Products. The GFTGlobal Funds Transfer segment provides global money transfer services and bill payment services to consumers. We primarily offer services through third-party agents, including retail chains, independent retailers, post offices and other financial institutions. We also offer Digital/Self-ServiceDigital solutions such as moneygram.com, mobile solutions, account deposit and kiosk-based services. Additionally, we have Company-operated retail locations in the U.S. and Western Europe. The FPPFinancial Paper Products segment provides official check outsourcing services and money orders through financial institutions and agent locations.
Basis of Presentation — The accompanying consolidated financial statements of MoneyGram are prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Consolidated Balance Sheets are unclassified due to the timing uncertainty surrounding the payment of settlement obligations.
Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience, future expectations and other factors and assumptions the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates and assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis and are revised when necessary. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period of change. Actual amounts may differ from these estimates.
Principles of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MoneyGram International, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Intercompany profits, transactions and account balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company participates in various trust arrangements (special purpose entities or “SPEs”) related to official check processing agreements with financial institutions and structured investments within the investment portfolio. Working in cooperation with certain financial institutions, the Company historically established separate consolidated SPEs that provided these financial institutions with additional assurance of its ability to clear their official checks. The Company maintains control of the assets of the SPEs and receives all investment revenue generated by the assets. The Company remains liable to satisfy the obligations of the SPEs, both contractually and by operation of the Uniform Commercial Code, as issuer and drawer of the official checks. As the Company is the primary beneficiary and bears the primary burden of any losses, the SPEs are consolidated in the consolidated financial statements. The assets of the SPEs are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in a manner consistent with the assets of the Company based on the nature of the asset. Accordingly, the obligations have been recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Payment service obligations.” The investment revenue generated by the assets of the SPEs is allocated to the FPPFinancial Paper Products segment in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For the years endingAs of December 31, 2015 and 2014,2017, the Company’sCompany had only one SPE remaining with settlement assets equal to the payment service obligations of $0.8 million. As of December 31, 2016, the Company's SPEs had settlement assets andequal to payment service obligations of $2.1$1.7 million.
Merger Agreement — On January 26, 2017, MoneyGram International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended by the First Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 15, 2017, the “Merger Agreement”) with Alipay (UK) Limited, a United Kingdom limited company (“Alipay”), Matrix Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Alipay (“Merger Sub”), and, solely for purposes of certain specified provisions of the Merger Agreement, Alipay (Hong Kong) Holding Limited, a Hong Kong limited company, providing for the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company, with the Company surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Alipay (the “Merger”). The closing of the Merger was subject to certain conditions, including clearance by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) under the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended. On January 2, 2018, the parties to the Merger Agreement have been advised that CFIUS clearance of the Merger will not be forthcoming, and after further discussion between the parties, they determined to cease efforts to seek CFIUS approval and entered into a Termination Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”). Pursuant to the Termination Agreement, Alipay paid the Company a termination fee of $30.0 million on January 3, 2018. The parties have agreed to release each other from certain claims and $3.1 million, respectively.liabilities arising out of or relating to the Merger Agreement or the transactions contemplated thereby.
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Cash and cash equivalents — The Company defines cash and cash equivalents and settlement cash and cash equivalents as cash on hand and all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less at the purchase date.
Settlement assets and payment service obligations — Settlement assets represent funds received or to be received from agents for unsettled money transfers, money orders and consumer payments. The Company records corresponding payment service obligations relating to amounts payable under money transfers, money orders and consumer payment service arrangements. Settlement assets consist of settlement cash and cash equivalents, receivables and investments. Payment service obligations primarily consist of: outstanding payment instruments; amounts owed to financial institutions for funds paid to the Company to cover clearings of official check payment instruments, remittances and clearing adjustments; amounts owed to agents for funds paid to consumers on behalf of the Company; commissions owed to financial institution customers and agents for instruments sold; amounts owed to investment brokers for purchased securities and unclaimed instruments owed to various states. These obligations are recognized by the Company at the time the underlying transactions occur.transaction occurs.
The Company’s primary licensed entity,entities are MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc. (“MPSI”), and MoneyGram International Limited, which enable us to offer our money transfer service in the European Economic Area as well as around the globe. MPSI is regulated by various U.S. state agencies that generally require the Company to maintain a pool of assets with an investment rating bearing one of A or higherthe three highest grades as defined by a nationally recognized rating agency (“permissible investments”) in an amount equal to the payment service obligations, as defined by each state, for those regulated payment instruments, namely teller checks, agent checks, money orders and money transfers. The regulatory payment service assets measure varies by state, but in all cases excludes investments rated below A-. The most restrictive states may also exclude assets held at banks that do not belong to a national insurance program, varying amounts of accounts receivable balances and/or assets held in one of the SPEs.SPE. The regulatory payment service obligations measure varies by state, but in all cases is substantially lower than the Company’s payment service obligations as disclosed in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as the Company is not regulated by state agencies for payment service obligations resulting from outstanding cashier’s checks or for amounts payable to agents and brokers.
Our primary overseas operating subsidiary, MoneyGram International Ltd., is a licensed payment institution in the United Kingdom, enabling us to offer our money transfer service in the European Economic Area. We are also subject to licensing or other regulatory requirements in various other jurisdictions. Licensing requirements may include minimum net worth, provision of surety bonds or letters of credit, compliance with operational procedures, agent oversight and the maintenance of settlement assets in an amount equivalent to outstanding payment service obligations, as defined by our various regulators.
The regulatory and contractual requirements do not require the Company to specify individual assets held to meet its payment service obligations, nor is the Company required to deposit specific assets into a trust, escrow or other special account. Rather, the Company must maintain a pool of liquid assets sufficient to comply with the requirements. No third party places limitations, legal or otherwise, on the Company regarding the use of its individual liquid assets. The Company is able to withdraw, deposit or sell its individual liquid assets at will, with no prior notice or penalty, provided the Company maintains a total pool of liquid assets sufficient to meet the regulatory and contractual requirements. Regulatory requirements also require MPSI to maintain positive net worth, with certain states requiring that MPSI maintain positive tangible net worth. The Company was in compliance with its contractual and financial regulatory requirements as of December 31, 2015.2017.
The following table summarizes the amount of Settlement assets and Payment service obligations as of December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Settlement assets: | | | | | | |
| Settlement cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,560.7 |
| | $ | 1,657.3 |
| $ | 1,469.9 |
| | $ | 1,365.0 |
|
| Receivables, net | 861.4 |
| | 757.6 |
| 1,125.8 |
| | 999.4 |
|
| Interest-bearing investments | 1,062.4 |
| | 1,091.6 |
| 1,154.2 |
| | 1,252.1 |
|
| Available-for-sale investments | 21.1 |
| | 27.1 |
| 7.0 |
| | 17.8 |
|
| | 3,505.6 |
| | 3,533.6 |
| 3,756.9 |
| | 3,634.3 |
|
| Payment service obligations | $ | (3,505.6 | ) | | $ | (3,533.6 | ) | $ | (3,756.9 | ) | | $ | (3,634.3 | ) |
Receivables, net (included in settlement assets) — The Company has receivables due from financial institutions and agents for payment instruments sold and amounts advanced by the Company to certain agents for operational and local regulatory purposes. These receivables are outstanding from the day of the sale of the payment instrument until the financial institution or agent remits the funds to the Company. The Company provides an allowance for the portion of the receivable estimated to become uncollectible based on its history of collection experience, known collection issues, such as agent suspensions and bankruptcies, consumer credit card chargebacks and insufficient funds and other matters the Company identifies in its routine collection monitoring. Receivables are generally considered past due one day after the contractual remittance schedule, which is typically one to three days after the
sale of the underlying payment instrument. Receivables are generally written off against the allowance one year after becoming past due.
The following summary details the activity within the allowance for credit losses for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Beginning balance | $ | 10.7 |
| | $ | 10.7 |
| | $ | 11.7 |
| $ | 11.8 |
| | $ | 9.2 |
| | $ | 10.7 |
|
| Provision | 20.4 |
| | 11.1 |
| | 9.6 |
| 8.0 |
| | 12.9 |
| | 20.4 |
|
| Write-offs, net of recoveries | (21.9 | ) | | (11.1 | ) | | (10.6 | ) | (13.2 | ) | | (10.3 | ) | | (21.9 | ) |
| Ending balance | $ | 9.2 |
| | $ | 10.7 |
| | $ | 10.7 |
| $ | 6.6 |
| | $ | 11.8 |
| | $ | 9.2 |
|
Investments (included in settlement assets) — The Company classifies securities as interest-bearing or available-for-sale. The Company has no securities classified as trading or held-to-maturity. Time deposits and certificates of deposits with original maturities of up to 24 months are classified as interest-bearing investments and recorded at amortized cost. Securities held for indefinite periods of time, including any securities that may be sold to assist in the clearing of payment service obligations or in the management of the investment portfolio, are classified as available-for-sale securities. These securities are recorded at fair value, with the net after-tax unrealized gain or loss recorded as a separate componentin "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" in the stockholders' deficit section of stockholders’ deficit.the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized gains and losses and other-than-temporary impairments are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.Operations under "Net securities gains."
Interest income on residential mortgage-backed securities for which risk of credit loss is deemed remote is recorded utilizing the level yield method. Changes in estimated cash flows, both positive and negative, are accounted for with retrospective changes to the carrying value of investments in order to maintain a level yield over the life of the investment. Interest income on residential mortgage-backed securities for which risk of credit loss is not deemed remote is recorded under the prospective method as adjustments of yield.
The Company applies the cost recovery method of accounting for interest to itssome of the investments categorized as other asset-backed securities.within the available-for-sale portfolio. The cost recovery method accounts for interest on a cash basis and deems any interest payments received as a recovery of principal, which reduces the book value of the related security. When the book value of the related security is reduced to zero, interest payments are then recognized as investment income upon receipt. The Company applies the cost recovery method of accounting as it believes it is probable that the Company will not recover all, or substantially all, of its principal investment and interest for its asset-backed and other asset-backed securities given the sustained deterioration in the investment and securities market, the collapse of many asset-backed securities and the low levels to which the securities have been written down.
Securities with gross unrealized losses as of the balance sheet date are subject to a process for identifying other-than-temporary impairments. Securities that the Company deems to be other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to fair value in the period the impairment occurs. The assessment of whether such impairment has occurred is based on management’s evaluation of the underlying reasons for the decline in fair value on an individual security basis. The Company considers a wide range of factors about the security and uses its best judgment in evaluating the cause of the decline in the estimated fair value of the security and the prospects for recovery. The Company considers an investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired when it is deemed probable that the Company will not receive all of the cash flows contractually stipulated for the investment, or whether it is more likely than not that we will sell an investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis. The Company evaluates all residential mortgage-backed and other asset-backed investments rated A and below for which risk of credit loss is deemed more than remote for impairment. When an adverse change in expected cash flows occurs, and if the fair value of a security is less than its carrying value, the investment is written down to fair value through a permanent reduction to its amortized cost. Securities gains and losses are recognized upon the sale, call or maturity of securities using the specific identification method to determine the cost basis of securities sold. Any impairment charges and other securities gains and losses are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations under “Net securities gains.”
Fair Value of Financial Instruments — Financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, settlement cash and cash equivalents, investments, derivatives, deferred compensationpayment service obligations and debt. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, settlement cash and cash equivalents, interest-bearing investments and payment service obligations approximate fair value. The carrying value of debt is stated at amortized cost; however, for disclosure purposes the fair value is estimated. See Note 43 — Fair Value Measurement for information regarding the principles and processes used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments.
Derivative Financial Instruments — The Company recognizes derivative financial instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value is recognized through the “Transaction and operations support” line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period of change. See Note 65 — Derivative Financial Instruments for additional disclosure.
Property and Equipment — Property and equipment includes computer hardware, computer software, signage, equipment at agent locations, office furniture and equipment and leasehold improvements, and is stated at cost net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Property and equipment is depreciated and amortized using a straight-line method over the useful life or term of the lease or license. The cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization of assets sold or disposed of are removed from the financial statements, with the resulting gain or loss, if any, recognized in “Occupancy, equipment and supplies” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 76 — Property and Equipment for additional disclosure. The following table summarizes the estimated useful lives by major asset category:
|
| |
| Type of Asset | Useful Life |
| Computer hardware | 3 years |
| Computer software | 5 - 7 years |
| Signage | 3 years |
| Equipment at agent locations | 3 - 7 years |
| Office furniture and equipment | 7 years |
| Leasehold improvements | 10 years |
Tenant allowances for leasehold improvements are capitalized as leasehold improvements upon completion of the improvement and amortized over the shorter of the remaining term of the lease or 10 years.
Computer software includes acquired and internally developed software. For the years ended December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, software development costs of $47.2$43.9 million and $25.9$43.7 million, respectively, were capitalized. At December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, there was $86.9were $115.2 million and $61.5$101.1 million, respectively, of unamortized software development costs included in property and equipment.
Property and equipment are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable by comparing the carrying value of the assets to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset. If an impairment is determined to exist for property and equipment, the carrying value of the asset is reduced to the estimated fair value.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets — Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations and is assigned to the reporting unit in which the acquired business will operate. Intangible assets are recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. In the year following the period in which identified intangible assets become fully amortized, the fully amortized balances are removed from the gross asset and accumulated amortization amounts. Goodwill is not amortized, but is instead subject to impairment testing. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized using a straight-line method over their respective useful lives as follows:
|
| |
| Type of Intangible Asset | Useful Life |
| Contractual and customer relationships | 3-15 years |
| Non-compete agreements | 3-5 years |
| Developed technology | 5-7 years |
The Company evaluates its goodwill for impairment annually as of October 1 of each year or more frequently if impairment indicators arise in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other.” Goodwill is testedWhen testing goodwill for impairment, usingthe Company may elect to perform either a fair-value based approachqualitative test or a quantitative test to determine if it is more likely than not that the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. During a qualitative analysis, the Company considers the impact of any changes to the following factors: macroeconomic, industry and market factors, cost factors, and changes in overall financial performance, as well as any other relevant events and uncertainties impacting a reporting unit. If the qualitative assessment does not conclude that it is assessed atmore likely than not that the estimated value of the reporting unit level. Theis greater than the carrying value, the Company performs a quantitative analysis. In a quantitative testing, the carrying value of the reporting unit is compared to its estimated fair value, with any excess of carrying value overvalue. If the fair value deemed toof a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, there is no impairment. If not, we compare the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. To the extent the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge of the reporting unit's goodwill would be an indicator of potential impairment, in which case a second step is performed comparingrecognized; however, the recordedloss recognized would not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to its implied fair value.that reporting unit. Intangible assets with finite lives are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable by comparing the carrying value of the assets to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset. If an impairment is determined to exist for goodwill or intangible assets, the carrying value of the asset is reduced to the estimated fair value.
Payments on Long-Term Contracts — The Company makes payments to certain agents and financial institution customers as an incentive to enter into long-term contracts. The payments, or signing bonuses, are generally required to be refunded pro rata in
the event of nonperformance under, or cancellation of, the contract by the customer. All signingSigning bonuses are viewed as prepaid commissions expense and are, therefore, capitalized and amortized over the life of the related contract. Amortization of signing bonuses on long-term contracts is recorded in “Fee and other commissions expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The carrying values of the signing bonuses are reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable.
Income Taxes — The provision for income taxes is computed based on the pre-tax income (loss) income included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences that exist between the financial statement carrying value of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis, and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards on a taxing jurisdiction basis. The Company measures deferred tax assets and liabilities using enacted statutory tax rates that will apply in the years in which the Company expects the temporary differences to be recovered or paid. The Company's ability to realize deferred tax assets depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the carry-back or carry-forward periods provided for in the tax law. The Company establishes valuation allowances for its deferred tax assets based on a more-likely-than-not threshold. To the extent management believes that recovery is not likely, a valuation allowance is established in the period in which the determination is made.
The liability for unrecognized tax benefits is recorded as a non-cash item in “Accounts payable and other liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company records interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits in “Income tax expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 1312 — Income Taxes for additional disclosure.
Treasury Stock — Repurchased common stock is stated at cost and is presented as a separate component of stockholders’ deficit. See Note 1110 — Stockholders’ Deficit for additional disclosure.
Foreign Currency Translation — The Company converts assets and liabilities of foreign operations to their U.S. dollar equivalents at rates in effect at the balance sheet dates and records the translation adjustments in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Income statements of foreign operations are translated from the operation’s functional currency to U.S. dollar equivalents at the average exchange rate for the month. Foreign currency exchange transaction gains and losses are reported in “Transaction and operations support” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Revenue Recognition — The Company earns revenue primarily through service fees charged to consumers and through its investing activity. A description of these revenues and revenue recognition policies is as follows:
Fee and other revenue consists of transaction fees, service revenue, foreign exchange revenue and other revenue.
Transaction fees consist primarily of fees earned on money transfer, money order, bill payment and official check transactions. The money transfer transaction fees vary based on the principal value of the transaction and the locations in which these money transfers originate and to which they are sent. The official check, money order and bill payment transaction fees are fixed fees charged on a per item basis. Transaction fees are recognized at the time of the transaction or sale of the product.product and are presented on a gross basis.
Foreign exchange revenue is earned from the management of currency exchange spreads on money transfer transactions involving different “send” and “receive” currencies. Currency exchange spread is the difference between the exchange rate set by the Company to the consumer and the rate at which the Company or its agents are able to acquire currency. Foreign exchange revenue is recognized at the time the exchange in funds occurs.occurs and is presented on a gross basis.
Other revenue primarily consists of service charges on aged outstanding money orders and money order dispenser fees. Additionally, for unclaimed payment instruments and money transfers, we recognize breakage income when the likelihood of consumer pick-up becomes remote based on historical experience and there is no requirement for remitting balances to government agencies under unclaimed property laws.
Investment revenue is earned from the investment of funds generated from the sale of payment instruments, primarily official checks and money orders, and consists of interest income, dividend income, income received on our cost recovery securities and amortization of premiums and discounts.
Customer Loyalty Program — The MoneyGram Rewards loyalty program, introduced in January 2012, allowed enrolled members to earn points based on the face value of their send transactions, along with opportunities for points earned from promotional activities. Points were redeemable for various denominations of gift cards. The Company estimated the cost of the rewards and recorded this expense and the associated liability as points were accumulated by loyalty program members. The cost was recognized in “Transaction and operational support” within the Consolidated Statements of Operations, and the associated liability was included in “Accounts payable and other liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In October 2013, the Company began to transition its MoneyGram Rewards loyalty program to a convenience card program, which does not feature points. The Company provided participants in the MoneyGram Rewards program until December 7, 2013 to redeem any outstanding program points, after which all points were canceled. As a result of the point cancellation, the Company had a reduction of marketing expense of $3.9 million in 2013. As of December 31, 2015, the Company has no remaining liability related to the loyalty program.
Fee and Other Commissions Expense — The Company incurs fee commissions primarily related to our Global Funds Transfer products.services. In a money transfer transaction, both the agent initiating the transaction and the receiving agent earn a commission that is generally either a fixed fee or is based on a percentage of the fee charged to the consumer. The agent initiating the transaction and the receiving agent also earn foreign exchange commissions, which are generally based on a percentage of the foreign exchange spread. In a bill payment transaction, the agent initiating the transaction receives a commission that is generally based on a percentage of the fee charged to the consumer and, in limited circumstances, the biller receives a commission that is based on a percentage of the fee charged to the consumer. The Company generally does not pay commissions to agents on the sale of money orders, except, in certain limited circumstances, for large agents where we may pay a fixed commission based on total money order transactions. Other commissions expense includes the amortization of capitalized agent signing bonus payments.
Investment Commissions Expense — Investment commissions expense consists of amounts paid to financial institution customers based on short-term interest rate indices times the average outstanding cash balances of official checks sold by the financial institution. Investment commissions are recognized each month based on the average outstanding balances of each financial institution customer and their contractual variable rate for that month.
Marketing and Advertising Expense — Marketing and advertising costs are expensed as incurred or at the time the advertising first takes place and are recorded in the “Transaction and operations support” line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Marketing and advertising expense was $57.2 million, $65.1 million and $59.4 million $64.7 millionfor 2017, 2016 and $57.4 million for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation — Stock-based compensation awards are measured at fair value at the date of grant and expensed over their vesting or service periods. The expense, net of estimated forfeitures, is recognized using the straight-line method.method and is recorded in “Compensation and benefits” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company accounts for modifications to its share-based payment awards in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 718, "Compensation - Stock Compensation." Incremental compensation cost is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before its terms are modified, measured based on the share price and other pertinent factors at that date, and is recognized as compensation cost on the date of modification (for vested awards) or over the remaining vesting or service period (for unvested awards). Any unrecognized compensation cost remaining from the original award is recognized over the vesting period of the modified award. See Note 1211 — Stock-Based Compensation for additional disclosure of the Company’s stock-based compensation.
Reorganization and Restructuring Expenses — Reorganization and restructuring expenses consist of direct and incremental costs associated with reorganization, restructuring and related activities, including technology; process improvement efforts; independent consulting and contractors; severance; outplacement and other employee related benefits; facility closures, cease-use or related charges; asset impairments or accelerated depreciation and other expenses related to relocation of various operations to existing or new Company facilities and third-party providers, including hiring, training, relocation, travel and professional fees. The Company records severance-related expenses once they are both probable and estimable related to severance provided under an on-going benefit arrangement. One-time, involuntary benefit arrangements and other exit costs are recognized when the liability is incurred. The Company evaluates impairment issues associated with reorganization activities when the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable, and also reviews the appropriateness of the remaining useful lives of impacted fixed assets. See Note 3 — Reorganization and RestructuringCosts for additional disclosure of the Company’s reorganization and restructuring activities.
Earnings Per Share — For all periods in which it is outstanding, the Series D Participating Convertible Preferred Stock (the "D Stock") is included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding utilized to calculate basic earnings per common share because the D Stock is deemed a common stock equivalent. Diluted earnings per common share reflects the potential dilution that could result if securities or incremental shares arising out of the Company’s stock-based compensation plans were exercised or converted into common stock. Diluted earnings per common share assumes the exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method.
The following table is a reconciliation of the weighted-average amounts used in calculating (loss) earnings per share for the period ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Basic common shares outstanding | 62.1 |
| | 65.3 |
| | 71.6 |
| 62.9 |
| | 62.3 |
| | 62.1 |
|
| Shares related to stock options | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.2 |
| |
| Shares related to restricted stock units | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| — |
| | 3.6 |
| | — |
|
| Diluted common shares outstanding | 62.1 |
| | 65.5 |
| | 71.9 |
| 62.9 |
| | 65.9 |
| | 62.1 |
|
Potential common shares are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share when the effect would be anti-dilutive. All potential common shares are anti-dilutive in periods of net loss available to common stockholders. Stock options are anti-dilutive when the exercise price of these instruments is greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock for the period. The following table summarizes the weighted-average potential common shares excluded from diluted (loss) income per common share as their effect would be anti-dilutive or their performance conditions are not met for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Shares related to stock options | 3.4 |
| | 4.0 |
| | 3.6 |
| 1.7 |
| | 2.7 |
| | 3.4 |
|
| Shares related to restricted stock units | 3.8 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 0.8 |
| 3.2 |
| | — |
| | 3.8 |
|
| Shares excluded from the computation | 7.2 |
| | 5.1 |
| | 4.4 |
| 4.9 |
| | 2.7 |
| | 7.2 |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Related DevelopmentsDevelopments — In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"(the "FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic(Topic 606) ("ASU 2014-09"). The new guidance sets forth a new five-step revenue recognition model which replaces the priorcurrent revenue recognition guidance in its entirety and is intended to eliminate numerous industry-specific pieces of revenue recognition guidance that have historically existed in GAAP. The underlying principle of the new standard is that a business or other organization will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects in exchange for the goods or services. The standard alsoand requires more detailed disclosuresdisclosures. To further assist with adoption and provides additional guidanceimplementation of ASU 2014-09, the FASB issued the following ASUs:
ASU 2016-08 (Issued March 2016) — Principal versus Agent Consideration (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)
ASU 2016-10 (Issued April 2016) — Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing
ASU 2016-12 (Issued May 2016) — Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients
ASU 2016-20 (Issued December 2016) — Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
These ASUs are effective for transactionspublic entities for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, but not before interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is
not early adopting these standards and will use the cumulative effect transition method upon adoption. Based on our evaluation for money transfer and bill payment services provided by the Global Funds Transfer segment, the Company has determined that were not addressed completelyeach of these services includes only one performance obligation to the customer. For the Company's money transfer service, the performance obligation is to collect the consumer's money and make funds available for payment, generally on the same day, to a designated recipient in the prior accounting guidance. currency requested. For the Company's bill payment service, the performance obligation is to collect the consumer's money and transfer the funds to the designated institution, generally on the same day. The satisfaction of these performance obligations occurs at a point in time, which is not a change from how we currently recognize revenue. For the money orders and official checks products, the Company will continue to recognize revenue on a monthly basis depending on the volume of products sold. As such, the adoption of this standard will not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and a minimal impact on our internal controls over financial reporting. Based on the disclosure requirements of ASC 606, upon adoption, we expect to provide expanded disclosures relating to our revenue recognition policies and how these relate to our revenue-generating contractual performance obligations. Management is finalizing its disclosure requirements of this standard.
In August 2015,February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14,2016-02, RevenueLeases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires organizations to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and to disclose key information about leasing arrangements. The classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases are substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases in the previous lease guidance. The FASB retained the distinction between finance leases and operating leases, leaving the effect of leases in the statement of comprehensive income and the statement of cash flows largely unchanged from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferralprevious GAAP. ASU 2016-02 mandates a modified retrospective transition method and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption of the Effective Dateamendment is permitted but the Company will not be early adopting this standard. The Company's leases consist primarily of operating leases for buildings, equipment and vehicles. The impact of this ASU on the Company’s consolidated financial statements is still being evaluated but, due to the nature of the Company's leases, management believes that this standard will not have a material impact on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This standard makes several modifications to Topic 718 related to the accounting for forfeitures, employer tax withholding on share-based compensation and the financial statement presentation of excess tax benefits or deficiencies. Under the new ASU, companies are allowed to withhold up to the employees' maximum statutory tax rates in the applicable jurisdictions without resulting in liability classification. Further, the ASU requires that cash payments to tax authorities in connection with shares withheld to meet statutory tax withholding requirements be presented as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of 2017. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, the Company presented cash payments to tax authorities in connection with shares withheld to meet statutory tax withholdings requirements as an operating activity in its statement of cash flows. Upon adoption of this ASU, the presentation of these payments was reclassified to a financing activity and prior period Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows have been updated to reflect this change.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Intra- Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The amendmentThis standard requires that an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. Consequently, the amendments in this standard eliminate the exception for an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory. ASU defers the2016-16 is effective date of ASU 2014-09 for all entitiespublic companies for one year. Public business entities should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impactwill not be early adopting this standard but, upon adoption, will have onuse the consolidated financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendmentsmodified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach will result in a reclassification of a net deferred charge of approximately $1.3 million from “Other assets” to the Consolidation Analysis, ("ASU 2015-02"). The new consolidation standard amended the process that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. ASU 2015-02 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2015, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 will have no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance ("ASU 2015-03"), which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. Under ASU 2015-03, an entity presents such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs is reported as interest expense. The Company early adopted ASU 2015-03 on December 31, 2015 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014 has been adjusted to apply the change in accounting principle retrospectively. Debt issuance costs of $13.9 million previously reported as "Other assets"“Retained loss” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet asSheets, with a partial offset, which the Company is in the process of December 31, 2014finalizing, for the establishment of remaining net deferred tax assets in each respective jurisdiction.
The Company has determined that there have been reclassified as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability. There is no effect on our Consolidated Statement of Operations as a result of the change inother recently adopted or issued accounting principle.
In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, Interest - Imputed Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (“ASU 2015-15”), which clarifiesstandards that the guidance in ASU 2015-03 does not apply to line-of-credit arrangements. ASU 2015-15 allows for an entity to defer and present debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements as an asset and subsequently amortize the debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The early adoption of ASU 2015-15had, or will have, noa material impact on ourits consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-05, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement ("ASU 2015-05"), which amends ASC 350-40 to provide customers with guidance on whether a cloud computing arrangement contains a software license to be accounted for as internal use software. ASU 2015-05 will be effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2015-05 will not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) ("ASU 2015-07"), which removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Instead, those investments must be included as a reconciling line item so that the total fair value amount of investments in the disclosure is consistent with the amount on the balance sheet. ASU 2015-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2015-07 will not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments ("ASU 2015-16") which replaces the requirement that an acquirer in a business combination account for measurement period adjustments retrospectively with a requirement that an acquirer recognize adjustments to the provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2015-16 will not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 — Reorganization and Restructuring Costs
In the first quarter of 2014, the Company announced the implementation of a global transformation program (the "2014 Global Transformation Program"), which includes certain reorganization and restructuring activities centered around facilities and headcount rationalization, system efficiencies and headcount right-shoring and outsourcing. The Company expects to complete these reorganization and restructuring activities in early 2016. In the third quarter of 2015, the Company initiated additional reorganization and restructuring activities to further improve operational efficiencies. The Company projects that these other restructuring activities will conclude at or near the end of 2016. The 2014 Global Transformation Program and other restructuring activities include employee termination benefits and other costs which qualify as restructuring activities as defined by ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations ("ASC 420"), as well as certain reorganization activities related to the relocation of various operations to existing or new Company facilities and third-party providers which are outside the scope of ASC 420. The following figures are the Company’s estimates and are subject to change as the 2014 Global Transformation Program comes to an end and the other restructuring activities continue to be implemented.
The following table is a roll-forward of the restructuring costs accrual as of December 31, 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 Global Transformation Program | | Other Restructuring | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Severance, Outplacement and Related Benefits | | Other (1) | | Severance, Outplacement and Related Benefits | | Total |
| Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 12.6 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 13.3 |
|
| Expenses | 3.1 |
| | 1.3 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 5.0 |
|
| Cash payments | (11.9 | ) | | (2.0 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | | (14.3 | ) |
| Balance, December 31, 2015 | $ | 3.8 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 4.0 |
|
(1)Other primarily relates to expenses for facilities relocation and professional fees. Such costs are expensed as incurred.
The following table is a summary of the cumulative restructuring costs incurred to date in operating expenses and the estimated remaining restructuring costs to be incurred as of December 31, 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 Global Transformation Program | | Other Restructuring | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Severance, Outplacement and Related Benefits | | Other (1) | | Severance, Outplacement and Related Benefits | | Total |
| Restructuring costs | | | | | | | |
| Cumulative restructuring costs incurred to date in operating expenses | $ | 17.7 |
| | $ | 3.0 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 21.3 |
|
| Estimated additional restructuring costs to be incurred | 1.6 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 2.5 |
|
| Total restructuring costs incurred and to be incurred | $ | 19.3 |
| | $ | 3.4 |
| | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | 23.8 |
|
(1)Other primarily relates to expenses for facilities relocation and professional fees. Such costs are expensed as incurred.
The following table summarizes the reorganization and restructuring costs recorded for the years ended December 31:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Restructuring costs in operating expenses: | | | | | |
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 3.7 |
| | $ | 14.4 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Transaction and operations support | 1.3 |
| | 1.9 |
| | — |
|
| Total restructuring costs in operating expenses | 5.0 |
| | 16.3 |
| | — |
|
| Reorganization costs in operating expenses: | | | | | |
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 6.8 |
| | $ | 5.0 |
| | $ | 1.2 |
|
| Transaction and operations support | 6.7 |
| | 8.4 |
| | 0.7 |
|
| Occupancy, equipment and supplies | 1.5 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 1.3 |
|
| Total reorganization costs in operating expenses | 15.0 |
| | 14.2 |
| | 3.2 |
|
| Total reorganization and restructuring costs | $ | 20.0 |
| | $ | 30.5 |
| | $ | 3.2 |
|
The following table is a summary of the total cumulative restructuring costs incurred to date in operating expenses and the total estimated remaining restructuring costs to be incurred by reportable segment:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | GFT | | FPP | | Other | | Total |
| 2014 Global Transformation Program | | | | | | | |
| Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 13.9 |
| | $ | 1.7 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 16.3 |
|
| First quarter 2015 | 2.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | 2.4 |
|
| Second quarter 2015 | 0.8 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 0.9 |
|
| Third quarter 2015 | 0.4 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 0.5 |
|
| Fourth quarter 2015 | 0.5 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Total cumulative restructuring costs incurred to date in operating expenses | $ | 17.8 |
| | $ | 2.2 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 20.7 |
|
| Total estimated additional restructuring costs to be incurred | 1.8 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | 2.0 |
|
| | $ | 19.6 |
| | $ | 2.4 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 22.7 |
|
| Other Restructuring | | | | | | | |
| Third quarter 2015 | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.5 |
|
| Fourth quarter 2015 | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.1 |
|
| Total cumulative restructuring costs incurred to date in operating expenses | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.6 |
|
| Total estimated additional restructuring costs to be incurred | 0.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.5 |
|
| | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1.1 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Total restructuring costs incurred and to be incurred | $ | 20.7 |
| | $ | 2.4 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 23.8 |
|
Note 43 — Fair Value Measurement
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability, or the exit price, in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A three-level hierarchy is used for fair value measurements based upon the observability of the inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. Under the hierarchy, the highest priority is given to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), followed by observable inputs (Level 2) and unobservable inputs (Level 3). A financial instrument’s level within the hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following is a description of the Company’s valuation methodologies used to estimate the fair value for assets and liabilities:
Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Available-for-sale investments —- For U.S. government agency securities and residential mortgage-backed securities collateralizedissued by U.S. government agency securities,agencies, fair value measures are generally obtained from an independent sources, including a pricing service. BecauseAs market quotes are generally not readily available or accessible for these specific securities, the pricing service generally measures fair value through the use of pricing models andutilizing reported market quotes adjusted for observable inputs, such as market prices for similar assetscomparable securities, spreads, prepayment speeds, yield curves and market data.delinquency rates. Accordingly, these securities are classified as Level 2 financial instruments.
For asset-backed and other asset–backed securities, andwhich include investments in limited partnerships, market quotes are generally not available. The Company will utilize autilizes broker quotequotes to measure market value, if available. Because the inputs and assumptions that brokers use to develop prices are unobservable, most valuations that are based on brokers' quotes are classified as Level 3. If no broker quote is available,Also, the Company willuses pricing services that utilize a fair value measurement from a pricing service. The pricing service utilizes pricing models based on market observable data and indices, such asunobservable data. The observable inputs include quotes for comparable securities, yield curves, default indices, interest rates, and historical prepayment speeds. Observability ofspeeds and delinquency rates. These pricing models also apply an inactive market inputs to the valuation models used for pricing certain of the Company's investments has deteriorated with the disruption to the credit marketsadjustment as overall liquiditya significant unobservable input. Accordingly, asset-backed and trading activity in these sectors has been substantially reduced. Accordingly, other asset-backed securities valued using third-party pricing models are classified as Level 3.
Derivative financial instruments — Derivatives consist of forward contracts to manage income statement exposure to foreign currency exchange risk arising from the Company’s assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. The Company’s forward contracts are well-established products, allowing the use of standardized models with market-based inputs. These models do not contain a high level of subjectivity, and the inputs are readily observable. Accordingly, the Company has classified its forward contracts as Level 2 financial instruments. See Note 65 — Derivative Financial Instruments for additional disclosure on the Company's forward contracts.
Deferred compensation — The assets associated with the deferred compensation plan that are funded through voluntary contributions by the Company consist of investments in money market securities and mutual funds. These investments were classified as Level 1 as there are quoted market prices for these funds.
The following tables summarizetable summarizes the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value by hierarchy level on a recurring basis as of December 31:basis:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value at December 31, 2015 |
| (Amounts in millions) | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| Financial assets: | | | | | | | |
| Available-for-sale investments: | | | | | | | |
| Residential mortgage-backed securities — agencies | $ | — |
| | $ | 9.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 9.5 |
|
| Other asset-backed securities | — |
| | — |
| | 11.6 |
| | 11.6 |
|
| Forward contracts | — |
| | 0.8 |
| | — |
| | 0.8 |
|
| Total financial assets | $ | — |
| | $ | 10.3 |
| | $ | 11.6 |
| | $ | 21.9 |
|
| Financial liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Forward contracts | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.1 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value at December 31, 2014 |
| (Amounts in millions) | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| Financial assets: | | | | | | | |
| Available-for-sale investments: | | | | | | | |
| Residential mortgage-backed securities — agencies | $ | — |
| | $ | 14.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 14.5 |
|
| Other asset-backed securities | — |
| | — |
| | 12.6 |
| | 12.6 |
|
| Investment related to deferred compensation trust | 10.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10.0 |
|
| Forward contracts | — |
| | 4.8 |
| | — |
| | 4.8 |
|
| Total financial assets | $ | 10.0 |
| | $ | 19.3 |
| | $ | 12.6 |
| | $ | 41.9 |
|
| Financial liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Forward contracts | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.3 |
|
The following table is a summary of the unobservable inputs used in the valuation of other asset-backed securities classified as Level 3 as of December 31:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| (Amounts in millions, except net average price) | | Unobservable Input | | Pricing Source | | Market Value | | Net Average Price(1) | | Market Value | | Net Average Price(1) |
| Alt-A | | Price | | Third-party pricing service | | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | 79.19 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | 80.75 |
|
| Home equity | | Price | | Third-party pricing service | | 0.1 |
| | 29.40 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 30.37 |
|
| Indirect exposure — high grade | | Price | | Third-party pricing service | | 8.3 |
| | 21.65 |
| | 8.3 |
| | 21.64 |
|
| Indirect exposure — mezzanine | | Price | | Third-party pricing service | | 0.8 |
| | 0.75 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 1.11 |
|
| Indirect exposure — mezzanine | | Price | | Broker | | 1.1 |
| | 1.58 |
| | 1.3 |
| | 1.52 |
|
| Other | | Net asset value | | Third-party pricing service | | 1.2 |
| | 6.34 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 9.15 |
|
| Total | | | | | | $ | 11.6 |
| | $ | 3.57 |
| | $ | 12.6 |
| | $ | 3.72 |
|
(1) Net average price is per $100.00 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| December 31, 2017 | | | | | |
| Financial assets: | | | | | |
| Available-for-sale investments: | | | | | |
| Residential mortgage-backed securities | $ | 5.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5.6 |
|
| Asset-backed and other securities | — |
| | 1.4 |
| | 1.4 |
|
| Forward contracts | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | 0.2 |
|
| Total financial assets | $ | 5.8 |
| | $ | 1.4 |
| | $ | 7.2 |
|
| Financial liabilities: | | | | | |
| Forward contracts | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1.0 |
|
| | | | | | |
| December 31, 2016 | | | | | |
| Financial assets: | | | | | |
| Available-for-sale investments: | | | | | |
| Residential mortgage-backed securities | $ | 7.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 7.2 |
|
| Asset-backed and other securities | — |
| | 10.6 |
| | 10.6 |
|
| Forward contracts | 2.4 |
| | — |
| | 2.4 |
|
| Total financial assets | $ | 9.6 |
| | $ | 10.6 |
| | $ | 20.2 |
|
| Financial liabilities: | | | | | |
| Forward contracts | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.1 |
|
The following table provides a roll-forward of the asset-backed and other asset-backed securities classified as Level 3, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, for the years ended December 31:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Beginning balance | $ | 12.6 |
| | $ | 20.6 |
| | $ | 18.0 |
|
| Principal paydowns | (0.9 | ) | | (5.7 | ) | | (3.7 | ) |
| Change in unrealized gains | (0.1 | ) | | (1.5 | ) | | 6.3 |
|
| Net realized losses | — |
| | (0.8 | ) | | — |
|
| Ending balance | $ | 11.6 |
| | $ | 12.6 |
| | $ | 20.6 |
|
Realized gains and losses and other-than-temporary impairments related to these available-for-sale investment securities are reported in the "Net securities gains" line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, while unrealized gains and losses related to available-for-sale securities are recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" in the stockholders' deficit section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets. There were no other-than-temporary impairments during 2015, 2014 and 2013. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Beginning balance | $ | 10.6 |
| | $ | 11.6 |
| | $ | 12.6 |
|
| Principal paydowns | (0.8 | ) | | (1.2 | ) | | (0.9 | ) |
| Change in unrealized gains | 3.8 |
| | 0.3 |
| | (0.1 | ) |
| Net realized gains | (12.2 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | — |
|
| Ending balance | $ | 1.4 |
| | $ | 10.6 |
| | $ | 11.6 |
|
Assets and liabilities that are disclosed at fair value — Debt and interest-bearing investments are carried at amortized cost; however, the Company estimates the fair value of debt for disclosure purposes. The fair value of debt is estimated using an observable market quotation (Level 2). The following table is a summary of the Company's fair value and carrying value of debt as of December 31:
| | | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | Fair Value | | Carrying Value |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Senior secured credit facility | $ | 858.9 |
| | $ | 884.0 |
| | $ | 954.3 |
| | $ | 963.5 |
| $ | 910.8 |
| | $ | 912.5 |
| | $ | 914.2 |
| | $ | 924.0 |
|
The carrying amounts for the Company's cash and cash equivalents, settlement cash and cash equivalents, and interest-bearing investments and payment service obligations approximate fair value as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014.2016.
The Company records the investments in its defined benefit pension plan ("Pension Plan") trust at fair value. The majority of the Pension Plan’s investments are common/collective trusts held by the Pension Plan’s trustee. The fair values of the Pension Plan's investments are determined based on the current market values of the underlying assets. See Note 9 —Pension and Other Benefits for additional disclosure of investments held by the Pension Plan.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis — Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis relate primarily to the Company’s property and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets, which are re-measured only in the event of an impairment. No impairments of property and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets were recorded during 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013.2015.
Fair value re-measurements are normally based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). Tangible and intangible asset fair values are derived using accepted valuation methodologies. If it is determined an impairment has occurred, the carrying value of the asset is reduced to fair value with a corresponding charge to the "Other expenses" line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company records the investments in its defined benefit pension plan ("Pension Plan") trust at fair value. The majority of the Pension Plan’s investments are common/collective trusts held by the Pension Plan’s trustee. The fair values of the Pension Plan's investments are determined based on the current market values of the underlying assets. See Note 10 —Pension and Other Benefits for additional disclosure of investments held by the Pension Plan.
Note 54 — Investment Portfolio
The Company’s portfolio is invested in cash and cash equivalents, interest-bearing investments and available-for-sale investments as described in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The following table shows the components of the investment portfolio as of December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Cash | $ | 1,717.3 |
| | $ | 1,898.1 |
| $ | 1,654.5 |
| | $ | 1,514.5 |
|
| Money market securities | 7.9 |
| | 9.8 |
| 5.4 |
| | 7.7 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents (1) | 1,725.2 |
| | 1,907.9 |
| 1,659.9 |
| | 1,522.2 |
|
| Interest-bearing investments | 1,062.4 |
| | 1,091.6 |
| 1,154.2 |
| | 1,252.1 |
|
| Available-for-sale investments | 21.1 |
| | 27.1 |
| 7.0 |
| | 17.8 |
|
| Total investment portfolio | $ | 2,808.7 |
| | $ | 3,026.6 |
| $ | 2,821.1 |
| | $ | 2,792.1 |
|
(1) For purposes of the discussiondisclosure of the investment portfolio as a whole, the cash and cash equivalents balance includes settlement cash and cash equivalents.
Cash and Cash Equivalents — Cash and cash equivalents consist of interest-bearing deposit accounts, non-interest bearing transaction accounts and money market securities. The Company’s money market securities are invested in two funds, each of which is AAA rated and consists of U.S. Treasury bills, notes or other obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government and its agencies, as well as repurchase agreements secured by such instruments.
Interest-bearing Investments — Interest-bearing investments consist of time deposits and certificates of deposit with maturities of up to 24 months, and are issued from financial institutions rated A- or better as of December 31, 2015.2017.
Available-for-sale Investments — Available-for-sale investments consist of residential mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed and other asset-backed securities. The following table is a summary of the amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale investments as of December 31:investments:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2015 |
| (Amounts in millions, except net average price) | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Fair Value | | Net (1) Average Price |
| Residential mortgage-backed securities — agencies | $ | 8.7 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 9.5 |
| | $ | 111.00 |
|
| Other asset-backed securities | 1.7 |
| | 9.9 |
| | 11.6 |
| | 3.57 |
|
| Total | $ | 10.4 |
| | $ | 10.7 |
| | $ | 21.1 |
| | $ | 6.32 |
|
(1) Net average price is per $100.00
The following table is a summary of the amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale investments as of December 31, 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 |
| (Amounts in millions, except net average price) | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Fair Value | | Net (1) Average Price |
| Residential mortgage-backed securities — agencies | $ | 13.2 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 14.5 |
| | $ | 110.25 |
|
| Other asset-backed securities | 3.1 |
| | 9.5 |
| | 12.6 |
| | 3.72 |
|
| Total | $ | 16.3 |
| | $ | 10.8 |
| | $ | 27.1 |
| | $ | 8.04 |
|
(1) Net average price is per $100.00 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Fair Value |
| December 31, 2017 | | | | | |
| Residential mortgage-backed securities | $ | 5.2 |
| | $ | 0.4 |
| | $ | 5.6 |
|
| Asset-backed and other securities | 0.2 |
| | 1.2 |
| | 1.4 |
|
| Total | $ | 5.4 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | 7.0 |
|
| | | | | | |
| December 31, 2016 | | | | | |
| Residential mortgage-backed securities | $ | 6.6 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 7.2 |
|
| Asset-backed and other securities | 1.0 |
| | 9.6 |
| | 10.6 |
|
| Total | $ | 7.6 |
| | $ | 10.2 |
| | $ | 17.8 |
|
As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014, 45 percent2016, 80% and 54 percent,40%, respectively, of the fair value of the available-for-sale portfolio were invested in residential mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government agency residential mortgage-backed securities.agencies. These securities have the implicit backing of the U.S. government, and the Company expects to receive full par value upon maturity or pay-down, as well as all interest payments. Included in asset-backed and other asset-backed securities are collateralized debt obligations backed primarily by high-grade debt, mezzanine equity tranches of collateralized debt obligations and home equity loans, along with private equity investments, as summarized in Note 43 — Fair Value Measurement. The other asset-backed securities continue to have market exposure,
Gains and this risk is factored intoLosses —For the fair value estimates oftwelve months ended December 31, 2017, the Company withrecognized $12.2 million of investment income from the average priceredemption at par value of an$12.7 million of a previously impaired asset-backed security at $0.04 per dollarin "Investment revenue" on the Consolidated Statement of parOperations. Prior to the redemption, the security had $0.5 million in book value as of December 31, 2015.
Unrealized Gains and Losses —with $7.9 million in unrealized gains. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, net unrealized gains, net of $11.1tax of $2.2 million and $11.2$10.8 million, respectively, were included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss.” The Company had nominal unrealized losses in its available-for-sale portfolio as of December 31, 2017 and no unrealized losses in its available-for-sale portfolio as of December 31, 20152016. For 2017, 2016, and 2014.
Gains and Losses —For 2015 and 2013, the Company had no net realized gains or losses. During 2014, the Company realized $45.4 million of net securities gains related to certain securities settlements previously written down to a nominal fair value. See Note 14 — Commitmentslosses and Contingencies for additional disclosure.no other-than-temporary impairments.
Investment Ratings — In rating the securities in its investment portfolio, the Company uses ratings from Moody’s Investor Service (“Moody’s”), Standard & Poor's (“S&P”) and Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”). If the rating agencies have split ratings, the Company uses the lower of the highest two out of three ratings across the rating agencies for disclosure purposes. If none of the rating agencies have the same rating,institution has only two ratings, the Company uses the lowest rating acrosslower of the agenciestwo ratings for disclosure purposes. Securities issued or backed by U.S. government agencies are included in the AAA rating category. Investment grade is defined as a security having a Moody’s equivalent rating of Aaa, Aa, A or Baa or an S&P or Fitch equivalent rating of AAA, AA, A or BBB. The Company’s investments consisted of the following ratings as of December 31:
| | | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| (Amounts in millions, except percentages) | Number of Securities | | Fair Value | | Percent of Investments | | Number of Securities | | Fair Value | | Percent of Investments | Number of Securities | | Fair Value | | Percent of Investments | | Number of Securities | | Fair Value | | Percent of Investments |
| Investment grade | 12 |
| | $ | 9.4 |
| | 45 | % | | 13 |
| | $ | 14.3 |
| | 53 | % | 11 |
| | $ | 5.6 |
| | 80 | % | | 12 |
| | $ | 7.2 |
| | 40 | % |
| Below investment grade | 42 |
| | 11.7 |
| | 55 | % | | 44 |
| | 12.8 |
| | 47 | % | 38 |
| | 1.4 |
| | 20 | % | | 40 |
| | 10.6 |
| | 60 | % |
| Total | 54 |
| | $ | 21.1 |
| | 100 | % | | 57 |
| | $ | 27.1 |
| | 100 | % | 49 |
| | $ | 7.0 |
| | 100 | % | | 52 |
| | $ | 17.8 |
| | 100 | % |
Had the Company used the lowest rating from the rating agencies in the information presented above, there would be no change to the classifications in the above table as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively.
Contractual Maturities — Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations, sometimes without call or prepayment penalties. Maturities of residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed and other asset-backed securities depend on the repayment characteristics and experience of the underlying obligations.
Fair Value Determination — The Company uses various sources of pricing for its fair value estimates of its available-for-sale portfolio. The percentage of the portfolio for which the various pricing sources were used is as follows as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014: 95 percent2016: 93% and 95% used a third-party pricing service and 5 percent7% and 5% used broker quotes.quotes, respectively.
Note 65 — Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses forward contracts to manage its foreign currency needs and foreign currency exchange risk arising from its assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. While these contracts may mitigate certain foreign currency risk, they are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. These contracts will result in gains and losses which are reported in the "Transaction and operations support" line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company may also reportreports gains and losses from the spread differential between the rate set for its transactions and the actual cost of currency at the time the Company buys or sells in the open market. The “Transaction and operations support” line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the "Net cash provided by operating activities" line in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows include the following losses (gains)gains related to assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, for the years ended December 31:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Net realized foreign currency losses (gains) | $ | 21.3 |
| | $ | 25.0 |
| | $ | (3.3 | ) |
| Net (gains) losses from the related forward contracts | (32.7 | ) | | (24.0 | ) | | 5.3 |
|
| Net (gains) losses from foreign currency transactions and related forward contracts | $ | (11.4 | ) | | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 2.0 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net realized foreign currency gain (loss) | $ | 21.0 |
| | $ | (5.4 | ) | | $ | (21.3 | ) |
| Net (loss) gain from the related forward contracts | (13.5 | ) | | 23.6 |
| | 32.7 |
|
| Net gains from foreign currency transactions and related forward contracts | $ | 7.5 |
| | $ | 18.2 |
| | $ | 11.4 |
|
As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the Company had $295.8$311.5 million and $242.5$294.5 million, respectively, of outstanding notional amounts relating to its foreign currency forward contracts. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the Company reflects the following fair values of derivative forward contract instruments in its Consolidated Balance Sheets:
| | | |
| | Gross Amount of Recognized Assets | | Gross Amount of Offset | | Net Amount of Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets |
| | Gross Amount of Recognized Assets | | Gross Amount of Offset | | Net Amount of Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets |
| (Amounts in millions) | Balance Sheet Location | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | Balance Sheet Location | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Forward contracts | Other assets | | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 5.3 |
| | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | (0.5 | ) | | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 4.8 |
| Other assets | | $ | 0.4 |
| | $ | 2.6 |
| | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 2.4 |
|
| | | | | Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities | | Gross Amount of Offset | | Net Amount of Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets | | Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities | | Gross Amount of Offset | | Net Amount of Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets |
| (Amounts in millions) | Balance Sheet Location | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | Balance Sheet Location | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Forward contracts | Accounts payable and other liabilities | | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | (0.5 | ) | | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| Accounts payable and other liabilities | | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
|
The Company's forward contracts are primarily executed with counterparties governed by International Swaps and Derivatives Association agreements that generally include standard netting arrangements. Asset and liability positions from forward contracts and all other foreign exchange transactions with the same counterparty are net settled upon maturity.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by counterparties to its derivative contracts. The Company actively monitors its exposure to credit risk through the use of credit approvals and credit limits, and by selecting major international banks and financial institutions as counterparties. Collateral generally is not required of the counterparties or of the Company. In the unlikely event the counterparty fails to meet the contractual terms of the derivative contract, the Company’s risk is limited to the fair value of the instrument. The Company has not had any historical instances of non-performance by any counterparties, nor does it anticipate any future instances of non-performance.
Note 76 — Property and Equipment
The following table is a summary of "Property and equipment, net" as of December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Computer hardware and software | $ | 338.0 |
| | $ | 268.8 |
| $ | 432.1 |
| | $ | 373.3 |
|
| Signage | 87.9 |
| | 86.9 |
| 71.3 |
| | 85.0 |
|
| Equipment at agent locations | 58.0 |
| | 80.1 |
| 59.1 |
| | 60.5 |
|
| Office furniture and equipment | 29.2 |
| | 34.8 |
| 29.6 |
| | 28.0 |
|
| Leasehold improvements | 24.7 |
| | 35.1 |
| 28.6 |
| | 24.7 |
|
| Total property and equipment | 537.8 |
| | 505.7 |
| 620.7 |
| | 571.5 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (338.1 | ) | | (340.1 | ) | (405.8 | ) | | (370.5 | ) |
| Total property and equipment, net | $ | 199.7 |
| | $ | 165.6 |
| $ | 214.9 |
| | $ | 201.0 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for property and equipment for 2017, 2016 and 2015 2014 and 2013 was $63.4$73.0 million, $53.4$76.9 million, and $50.0$63.4 million, respectively.
At December 31, 20152017 and 2014, there was $7.52016, the Company had $5.1 million and $17.0$3.8 million, respectively, in accrued purchases of property and equipment that had been received by the Company and included in “Accounts payable and other liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During 2017 and 2015, the Company had a nominal losslosses related to relocations or disposal of its property and equipment. During 2014 and 2013,2016, the Company recognized a loss of $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, on furnituredisposal of signage and equipment related to office relocations and disposal of equipment and signage at agent locations. The losses were recorded in the “Occupancy, equipment and supplies” line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Note 87 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill — The following table is a roll-forwardCompany's goodwill balance was $442.2 million as of goodwill by reporting segment:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Global Funds Transfer | | Financial Paper Products | | Total |
| Balance as of December 31, 2014 | $ | 442.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 442.5 |
|
| Currency translation | (0.3 | ) | | — |
| | (0.3 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | $ | 442.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 442.2 |
|
December 31, 2017 and 2016, and all relates to the Global Funds Transfer segment. The Company performed an annual assessment of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013.2015. No impairments of goodwill were recorded in 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013.2015.
The following table is a summary of the gross goodwill balances and accumulated impairments as of December 31:
| | | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| (Amounts in millions) | Gross Goodwill | | Accumulated Impairments | | Gross Goodwill | | Accumulated Impairments | Gross Goodwill | | Accumulated Impairments | | Gross Goodwill | | Accumulated Impairments |
| Global Funds Transfer | $ | 445.4 |
| | $ | (3.2 | ) | | $ | 445.7 |
| | $ | (3.2 | ) | $ | 445.4 |
| | $ | (3.2 | ) | | $ | 445.4 |
| | $ | (3.2 | ) |
Intangibles — The following table is a summary of intangible assets included in “Other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 |
| (Amounts in millions) | Gross Carrying Value | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Value | | Gross Carrying Value | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Value |
| Contractual and customer relationships | $ | 11.7 |
| | $ | (4.5 | ) | | $ | 7.2 |
| | $ | 12.3 |
| | $ | (2.6 | ) | | $ | 9.7 |
|
| Non-compete agreements | 1.6 |
| | (0.7 | ) | | 0.9 |
| | 1.6 |
| | (0.4 | ) | | 1.2 |
|
| Developed technology | 1.1 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 0.9 |
| | 1.1 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 1.0 |
|
| Total intangible assets | $ | 14.4 |
| | $ | (5.4 | ) | | $ | 9.0 |
| | $ | 15.0 |
| | $ | (3.1 | ) | | $ | 11.9 |
|
The Company did not complete any acquisitions in 2015. In 2014, the Company completed two acquisitions. As a result of the acquisitions, the Company acquired agent contracts valued at $4.4 million, which are amortized over lives of six to eight years, acquired developed technology valued at $1.1 million, which is amortized over lives ranging from five to seven years, and entered into non-compete agreements valued at $0.6 million, which are amortized over lives ranging between three to five years. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| (Amounts in millions) | Gross Carrying Value | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Value | | Gross Carrying Value | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Value |
| Contractual and customer relationships | $ | 10.7 |
| | $ | (7.8 | ) | | $ | 2.9 |
| | $ | 11.1 |
| | $ | (6.3 | ) | | $ | 4.8 |
|
| Non-compete agreements | 1.0 |
| | (0.9 | ) | | 0.1 |
| | 1.5 |
| | (1.2 | ) | | 0.3 |
|
| Developed technology | 0.6 |
| | (0.3 | ) | | 0.3 |
| | 1.1 |
| | (0.7 | ) | | 0.4 |
|
| Total intangible assets | $ | 12.3 |
| | $ | (9.0 | ) | | $ | 3.3 |
| | $ | 13.7 |
| | $ | (8.2 | ) | | $ | 5.5 |
|
Intangible asset amortization expense for 2017, 2016 and 2015 2014 and 2013 was $2.7 million, $2.1 million, $3.0 million and $0.7$2.7 million, respectively. The estimated future intangible asset amortization expense is $2.6$1.5 million, $2.3$0.5 million, $1.7$0.5 million, $0.8$0.5 million and $0.7$0.3 million for 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2020,2022, respectively.
Note 98 — Debt
The following is a summary of the Company's outstanding debt as of December 31:
| | | | | | | | | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| (Amounts in millions, except percentages) | Effective Interest Rate | | 2015 | | 2014 | Effective Interest Rate | | | | Effective Interest Rate | | |
| Senior secured credit facility due 2020 | 4.25 | % | | $ | 954.3 |
| | $ | 964.1 |
| 4.94 | % | | $ | 914.2 |
| | 4.25 | % | | $ | 924.0 |
|
| Unamortized debt discount | | | (0.6 | ) | | (0.6 | ) | |
| Unamortized debt issuance costs | | | (11.1 | ) | | (13.9 | ) | |
| Unamortized debt issuance costs and debt discount | | | | (6.1 | ) | | | | (8.8 | ) |
| Total debt, net | | | $ | 942.6 |
| | $ | 949.6 |
| | | $ | 908.1 |
| | | | $ | 915.2 |
|
2013 Credit Agreement — On March 28, 2013, the Company, as borrower, entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the "2013 Credit Agreement") with Bank of America, N.A. ("BOA"), as administrative agent, the financial institutions party thereto as lenders and the other agents party thereto. The 2013 Credit Agreement provides for (i) a senior secured five-year revolving credit facility up to an aggregate principal amount of $125.0 million (the "Revolving Credit Facility") and (ii) a senior secured seven-year term loan facility of $850.0 million (the "Term Credit Facility"). The proceeds of the Term Credit Facility were used to repay in full all outstanding indebtedness under the $540.0 million Credit Agreement, with BOA, as Administrative Agent, and the lenders party thereto (the "2011 Credit Agreement"), to purchase all $325.0 million of the outstanding second lien notes held by Goldman, Sachs & Co. ("Goldman Sachs"), to pay certain costs, fees and expenses relating to the 2013 Credit Agreement and for general corporate purposes. The Revolving Credit Facility includes a sub-facility that permits the Company to request the issuance of letters of credit up to an aggregate amount of $50.0 million, with borrowings available for general corporate purposes.
On April 2, 2014, the Company, as borrower, entered into a First Incremental Amendment and Joinder Agreement (the "Incremental Agreement") with BOA, as administrative agent, and various lenders. The Incremental Agreement provided for (a) a tranche under the Term Credit Facility in an aggregate principal amount of $130.0 million (the "Tranche B-1 Term Loan Facility") to be made available to the Company under the 2013 Credit Agreement, (b) an increase in the Revolving Credit Facility under the 2013 Credit Agreement from $125.0 million to $150.0 million and (c) certain other amendments to the 2013 Credit Agreement including, without limitation, (i) amendments to certain of the conditions precedent with respect to these incremental borrowings, (ii) an increase in the maximum secured leverage ratio with which the Company is required to comply as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, and (iii) amendments to permit the Company to borrow up to $300.0 million under the Term Credit Facility for share repurchases exclusively from affiliates of Thomas H. Lee Partners L.P. ("THL") and Goldman, Sachs.Sachs & Co. ("Goldman Sachs"). The Company borrowed $130.0 million under the Tranche B-1 Term Loan Facility on April 2, 2014, and the proceeds were used to fund a portion of the share repurchases from THL reducing the remaining limit for such purchases to $170.0 million. See Note 11 — Stockholders' Deficit
On December 12, 2016, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 to the 2013 Credit Agreement, dated December 12, 2016 (the "2016 Amendment"), with BOA, as administrative agent, and various lenders. The 2016 Amendment includes, but is not limited to, decreasing the aggregate Revolving Credit Facility from $150.0 million to $125.0 million from December 12, 2016 to March 27, 2018 (the remainder of the original Revolving Credit Facility term) and increasing the maximum secured leverage ratio, effective the first quarter of 2017. The 2016 Amendment also extended the maturity date of the revolving credit commitments of the extending lenders, which represent commitments of $85.8 million in the aggregate, from March 28, 2018 to September 28, 2019. This 2016 Amendment was accounted for additional disclosure on the share repurchases.as a modification of debt in accordance with ASC Topic 470, “Debt.”
The 2013 Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of the non-financial assets of the Company and its material domestic subsidiaries that guarantee the payment and performance of the Company’s obligations under the 2013 Credit Agreement.
The Company may elect an interest rate under the 2013 Credit Agreement at each reset period based on the BOA prime bank rate or the Eurodollar rate. The interest rate election may be made individually for the Term Credit Facility and each draw under the Revolving Credit Facility. The interest rate will be either the “alternate base rate” (calculated in part based on the BOA prime rate) plus either 200 or 225 basis points (depending on the Company's secured leverage ratio or total leverage ratio, as applicable, at such time) or the Eurodollar rate plus either 300 or 325 basis points (depending on the Company's secured leverage ratio or total leverage ratio, as applicable, at such time). In connection withFor the initial funding under the 2013 Credit Agreement, the Company electedyears ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Eurodollar rate as itswas the effectively elected primary interest basis. Under the terms of the 2013 Credit Agreement, the minimum interest rate applicable to Eurodollar borrowings under the Term Credit Facility is 100 basis points plus the applicable margins previously referred to in this paragraph. The Company's effective interest rate on the senior secured borrowings increased from 4.25% at December 31, 2016 to 4.94% at December 31, 2017 due to an increase in the Eurodollar rate.
Fees on the daily unused availability under the Revolving Credit Facility are 50 basis points. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company had no outstanding letters of credit and no borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, leaving $150.0$125.0 million of availability thereunder.
2013 Note Repurchase — In connection with the Company's entry into the 2013 Credit Agreement, the Company purchased all $325.0 million of the outstanding second lien notes for a purchase price equal to 106.625 percent of the principal amount purchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, which was funded with a portion of the net proceeds from the 2013 Credit Agreement described above. Following the closing of the transaction, the second lien notes were canceled, and no second lien notes remain outstanding.
The termination of the 2011 Credit Agreement and entry into the 2013 Credit Agreement and the purchase of the second lien notes were accounted for principally as a debt extinguishment with a partial modification of debt, in accordance with ASC Topic 470, “Debt." Under debt extinguishment accounting, the Company expensed the pro-rata portion of debt issuance costs and debt discount costs related to the extinguished debt balance. For the debt balance classified as a modification, the Company was required to amortize the pro-rata portion of the debt issuance costs and unamortized debt discount from the 2011 Credit Agreement over the terms of the 2013 Credit Agreement. Additionally, the Company expensed the pro-rata portion of the financing costs related to the 2013 Credit Agreement as third-party costs in connection with the modification of debt.
Debt Covenants and Other Restrictions — Borrowings under the 2013 Credit Agreement are subject to various limitations that restrict the Company’s ability to: incur additional indebtedness; create or incur additional liens; effect mergers and consolidations; make certain acquisitions or investments; sell assets or subsidiary stock; pay dividends and other restricted payments; and effect loans, advances and certain other transactions with affiliates. In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility has covenants that place limitations on the use of proceeds from borrowings under the facility.
The terms of our debt agreements place significant limitations on the amount of restricted payments we may make, including dividends on our common stock and our repurchase of our capital stock. Subject to certain customary conditions, we may (i) make restricted payments in an aggregate amount not to exceed $50.0 million (without regard to a pro forma leverage ratio calculation), (ii) make restricted payments up to a formulaic amount determined based on an incremental build-up of our consolidated net income in future periods (subject to compliance with a maximum pro forma leverage ratio calculation) and (iii) repurchase capital stock from THL and Goldman Sachs in a remaining aggregate amount up to $170.0 million as discussed above.
The 2013 Credit Agreement contains various financial and non-financial covenants. A violation of these covenants could negatively impact the Company's liquidity by restricting the Company's ability to borrow under the Revolving Credit Facility and/or causing acceleration of amounts due under the credit facilities. The financial covenants in the 2013 Credit Agreement measure leverage, interest coverage and liquidity. Leverage is measured through a senior secured debt ratio calculated as consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), adjusted for certain items such as net securities gains, stock-based compensation expense, certain legal settlements and asset impairments, among other items, also referred to as adjusted EBITDA. This measure is similar, but not identical, to Adjusted EBITDA (EBITDA adjusted for certain significant items) as discussed in Note 1211 — Stock-Based Compensation. Compensation. Interest coverage is calculated as adjusted EBITDA to net cash interest expense.
The Company is required to maintain asset coverage greater than its payment service obligations. Assets used in the determination of the asset coverage covenant are cash and cash equivalents and settlement assets. Our cash and cash equivalents balance as of December 31, 2015 represents the excess of assets over our payment service obligation for purposes of determining asset coverage.
The following table shows the components of ourCompany's assets in excess of payment service obligations used for the asset coverage calculation, which is equal to total cash and cash equivalents and settlement assets less payment service obligations, are $190.0 million and $157.2 million as of December 31:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 164.5 |
| | $ | 250.6 |
|
| Settlement assets | 3,505.6 |
| | 3,533.6 |
|
| Total cash and cash equivalents and settlement assets | 3,670.1 |
| | 3,784.2 |
|
| Payment service obligations | (3,505.6 | ) | | (3,533.6 | ) |
| Assets in excess of payment service obligations | $ | 164.5 |
| | $ | 250.6 |
|
The 2013 Credit Agreement also has quarterly financial covenants to maintain the following interest coverage and secured leverage ratios:
|
| | | |
| | Interest Coverage Minimum Ratio | | Secured Leverage Not to Exceed |
Through December 31, 2015 | 2.25:1 | | 4.750:1 |
January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 | 2.25:1 | | 4.250:1 |
| January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 | 2.25:1 | | 4.250:1 |
| January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018 | 2.25:1 | | 4.000:1 |
| July 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 | 2.25:1 | | 3.750:1 |
January 1, 20182019 through maturity | 2.25:1 | | 3.500:1 |
At December 31, 2015,2017, the Company was in compliance with its financial covenants: our interest coverage ratio was 5.936.56 to 1.00 and our secured leverage ratio was 3.8213.308 to 1.00. We continuously monitor our compliance with our debt covenants.
Debt Issuance Costs —The Company presents debt issuance costs as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related indebtedness per the early adoption of ASU 2015-03 and amortizes these costs over the term of the related debt liability using the effective interest method. Expense of the debt issuance costs during 2013 includes the write-off of a pro-rata portion of debt issuance costs in connection with the extinguishment of the 2011 Credit Agreement, as well as payments on the second lien notes, the incremental term loan and the term debt. Amortization is recorded in “Interest expense” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In accordance with ASU 2015-15, theThe Company records debt issuance costs for its Revolving Credit Facility in Other assets on its Consolidated Balance Sheets and related amortization is recorded in "Interest expense" on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The unamortized costs associated with the Revolving Credit Facility were $1.2$0.7 million and $1.7$1.2 million as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively.
Debt Discount — The Company records debt discount as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related indebtedness on its Consolidated Balance Sheets with the respective debt discount amortization recorded in “Interest expense,”expense." In 2017 and 2015, the write-offCompany had no write-offs of the debt discount recordedand in "Debt extinguishment costs," on2016 the Consolidated Statements of Operations.Company had nominal write-offs.
Debt Extinguishment Costs — In 2015 and 2014, thereThere were no debt extinguishment costs.costs recognized in 2017 or 2015. In 2013,2016, the Company recognized debt extinguishment costs of $45.3$0.3 million in connection with the terminationTerm Credit Facility principal payments and debt repurchase discussed above which are recorded in "Debt extinguishment costs" on the Consolidated Statements of the 2011 Credit Agreement and entry into the 2013 Credit Agreement, which included $21.5 million in prepayment penalty, $20.0 million of unamortized debt issuance costs, $2.3 million of debt discount upon prepayments and $1.5 million of debt modification costs.Operations.
Interest Paid in Cash — The Company paid $42.1$41.9 million, $41.1$41.6 million and $43.9$42.1 million of interest in 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively.
Maturities — At December 31, 2015,2017, debt totaling $912.6$892.1 million will mature in 2020, while debt principal totaling $41.7$22.1 million will be paid quarterly in increments of approximately $2.5 million through 2020. Any borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility will mature in 2018.2019.
Note 109 — Pension and Other Benefits
Pension Benefits — The Company's Pension Plan is a frozen, non-contributory funded plan under which no new service or compensation credits are accrued by the plan participants. Cash accumulation accounts continue to be credited with interest credits until participants withdraw their money from the Pension Plan. It is the Company’s policy to fund at least the minimum required contribution each year plus additional discretionary amounts as available and necessary to minimize expenses of the plan.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans — The Company has obligations under various supplemental executive retirement plans (“SERPs”), which are unfunded non-qualified defined benefit pension plans providing postretirement income to their participants. As of December 31, 2015,2017, all benefit accruals under the SERPs are frozen with the exception of one plan for which service is frozen but future pay increases are reflected for active participants. It is the Company’s policy to fund the SERPs as benefits are paid.
The Company's Pension Plan and SERPs are collectively referred to as our “Pension."
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions — The Company has an unfunded defined benefit postretirement plan ("Postretirement Benefits") that provides medical and life insurance for its participants. The Company amended the Postretirement Benefits to close it to new participants as of December 31, 2009. Effective July 1, 2011, the Postretirement Benefits was amended to eliminate eligibility for participants eligible for Medicare coverage. As a result of this plan amendment, the Company no longer receives the Medicare retiree drug subsidy. The Company’s funding policy is to make contributions to the Postretirement Benefits as benefits are paid.
Actuarial Valuation Assumptions — The measurement date for the Company’s Pension and Postretirement Benefits is December 31. The following table is a summary of the weighted-average actuarial assumptions used in calculating net periodic benefit expense (income) and the benefit obligation for the years ended and as of December 31:
| | | | Pension Plan | | SERPs | | Postretirement Benefits | Pension Plan | | SERPs | | Postretirement Benefits |
| 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net periodic benefit expense (income): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 4.15 | % | | 4.81 | % | | 4.04 | % | | 4.78 | % | | 4.78 | % | | 3.99 | % | | 4.82 | % | | 4.82 | % | | 4.09 | % | |
| Discount rate for benefit obligation | | 4.05 | % | | 4.31 | % | | 4.15 | % | | 4.11 | % | | 4.32 | % | | 4.78 | % | | 4.30 | % | | 4.53 | % | | 4.82 | % |
| Discount rate for interest cost | | 3.36 | % | | 3.45 | % | | 4.15 | % | | 3.31 | % | | 3.32 | % | | 4.78 | % | | 3.38 | % | | 3.43 | % | | 4.82 | % |
| Expected return on plan assets | 4.74 | % | | 5.68 | % | | 6.20 | % | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 4.52 | % | | 4.66 | % | | 4.74 | % | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Rate of compensation increase | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.75 | % | | 5.75 | % | | 5.75 | % | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.75 | % | | 5.75 | % | | 5.75 | % | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Initial healthcare cost trend rate | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6.50 | % | | 7.00 | % | | 8.00 | % | |
| Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4.50 | % | | 4.50 | % | | 5.00 | % | |
| Year ultimate healthcare cost trend rate is reached | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2023 |
| | 2023 |
| | 2019 |
| |
| Medical trend rate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pre-65 initial healthcare cost trend rate | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7.00 | % | | 6.50 | % | | 6.50 | % |
| Post-65 initial healthcare cost trend rate | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8.25 | % | | 7.75 | % | | 6.25 | % |
| Pre and post-65 ultimate healthcare cost trend rate | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4.50 | % | | 4.50 | % | | 4.50 | % |
| Year ultimate healthcare cost trend rate is reached for pre/post-65, respectively | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2024/
2025 |
| | 2024 |
| | 2023 |
|
| Benefit obligation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 4.31 | % | | 4.04 | % | | 4.81 | % | | 4.32 | % | | 4.04 | % | | 4.78 | % | | 4.53 | % | | 4.19 | % | | 4.82 | % | 3.58 | % | | 4.05 | % | | 4.31 | % | | 3.65 | % | | 4.11 | % | | 4.32 | % | | 3.72 | % | | 4.30 | % | | 4.53 | % |
| Rate of compensation increase | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.75 | % | | 5.75 | % | | 5.75 | % | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.75 | % | | 5.75 | % | | 5.75 | % | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Initial healthcare cost trend rate | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6.50 | % | | 6.50 | % | | 7.00 | % | |
| Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4.50 | % | | 4.50 | % | | 4.50 | % | |
| Year ultimate healthcare cost trend rate is reached | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2024 |
| | 2023 |
| | 2023 |
| |
| Medical trend rate: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pre-65 initial healthcare cost trend rate | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7.75 | % | | 7.00 | % | | 6.50 | % |
| Post-65 initial healthcare cost trend rate | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7.75 | % | | 8.25 | % | | 7.75 | % |
| Pre and post-65 ultimate healthcare cost trend rate | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4.50 | % | | 4.50 | % | | 4.50 | % |
| Year ultimate healthcare cost trend rate is reached for pre/post-65, respectively | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2025/
2027 |
| | 2024/
2025 |
| | 2024 |
|
The Company utilizes a building-block approach in determining the long-term expected rate of return on plan assets. The expected return on plan assets is calculated using a calculated value of plan assets that is determined each year by adjusting the previous year's value by expected returns, benefit payments, and contributions. Asset gains and losses are reflected as equal adjustments over a three-year period. Historical markets are studied and long-term historical relationships between equity securities and fixed income securities are preserved consistent with the widely accepted capital market principle that assets with higher volatility generate a greater return over the long run. Current market factors, such as inflation and interest rates, are evaluated before long-term capital market assumptions are determined. The long-term portfolio return also takes proper consideration of diversification and rebalancing. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed for reasonableness and appropriateness.
Actuarial gains and losses are amortized using the corridor approach, by amortizing the balance exceeding 10% of the greater of the benefit obligation or the fair value of plan assets. The amortization period is primarily based on the average remaining service life of plan participants for the Pension and the average remaining expected life of plan participants for the Postretirement Benefits.
At December 31, 2015, the Company changed its method for estimating the interest cost components of net periodic benefit expense for its Pension and Postretirement Benefits. Previously, the The Company estimated the interest cost components utilizing a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve used to measure the benefit obligation. The new method utilizes a full yield curve approach in the estimation of these components by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to their underlying projected cash flows. This method provides a more precise measurement of interest costs by improving the correlation between projected benefit cash flows and their corresponding spot rates. The change does not affect the measurement of our total benefit obligations and it is accounted for as a change in accounting estimate, which is applied prospectively. For 2016, the change in estimate is expected to reduce Pension and Postretirement Benefits net periodic benefit expense from $8.4 million to $6.6 million.
Pension Assets — The Company employs a total returnliability-driven investment approach whereby a mix of equity and fixed income securities are used to maximize the long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities, plan funded status and corporate financial condition. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity and fixed income securities. Furthermore, equity securities are diversified across large and small capitalized securities international securities and fixed incomeinternational securities. Other assets, such as real estate and short-term investment funds,high yield bonds, are used onto further diversify equity allocations. Fixed income securities are primarily invested in a limited basis.mix of investment grade corporate bonds, government bonds, and a smaller allocation to non-investment grade debt. The Company strivesuses a strategy to maintain an equity and fixed income securitiesdetermine the allocation mix appropriate to itsof return-seeking assets driven by the Pension Plan’s funded status. As of December 31, 2015, the funding mix was approximately 44 percent equity and 56 percent fixed income.ratio. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis, throughincluding quarterly investment portfolio reviews and annualperiodic liability measurements.
The following table is a summary of the Company’s weighted-average asset allocation for the Pension Plan by asset category at the measurement date as of December 31:
|
| | | | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Equity securities | 44 | % | | 44 | % |
| Fixed income securities | 50 | % | | 51 | % |
| Real estate | 5 | % | | 4 | % |
| Other | 1 | % | | 1 | % |
| Total | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
The Company records its pension assets at fair value as described in Note 43 — Fair Value Measurement. The following is a description of the Pension Plan’s investments at fair value and valuation methodologies:
Common/collective trusts— The fair values of the underlying funds in the common/collective trusts are valued based on the unit value established for each fund at each valuation date. The unit value of a collective investment fund is calculated by dividing the fund's net asset value on the calculation date by the number of units of the fund that are outstanding on the calculation date, which is derived from observable purchase and redemption activity in the collective investment fund. The Company's common/collective trusts are categorized in Level 2 to the extent that they are readily redeemable at their net asset value. The Company changed the presentation of its common/collective trusts pension assets as of December 31, 2016 to match the December 31, 2017 presentation.
Real estate — The Pension Plan trust holds an investment in a real estate development project.project that the Company considers to be a Level 3 asset for valuation purposes because it requires the use of unobservable inputs in its fair value measurement. The fair value of this investment represents the estimated fair value of the plan’s related ownership percentage in the project based upon an appraisal of the underlying real property as of each balance sheet date. The fund investment strategy for this asset is long-term capital appreciation.
The following tables aretable is a summary of the Pension Plan’s financial assets recorded at fair value, by hierarchy level, as of December 31:level:
| | | | 2015 | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| December 31, 2017 | | | | | | | |
| Common/collective trusts | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Short-term investment fund | $ | — |
| | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | 3.3 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3.3 |
|
| Equity securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Large cap | — |
| | 26.8 |
| | — |
| | 26.8 |
| | 14.7 |
| | — |
| | 14.7 |
|
| Small cap | — |
| | 6.3 |
| | — |
| | 6.3 |
| | 3.4 |
| | — |
| | 3.4 |
|
| International | — |
| | 14.8 |
| | — |
| | 14.8 |
| | 10.1 |
| | — |
| | 10.1 |
|
| Fixed income securities | — |
| | 53.3 |
| | — |
| | 53.3 |
| | 82.2 |
| | — |
| | 82.2 |
|
| Total common/collective trusts | $ | — |
| | $ | 102.4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 102.4 |
| |
| Real estate | — |
| | — |
| | 5.5 |
| | 5.5 |
| | — |
| | 5.5 |
| | 5.5 |
|
| Total financial assets | $ | — |
| | $ | 102.4 |
| | $ | 5.5 |
| | $ | 107.9 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
| Total investments in the fair value hierarchy | | | $ | 113.7 |
| | $ | 5.5 |
| | $ | 119.2 |
|
| December 31, 2016 | | | | | | | |
| Common/collective trusts | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Short-term investment fund | $ | — |
| | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 2.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2.0 |
|
| Equity securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Large cap | — |
| | 34.2 |
| | — |
| | 34.2 |
| | 15.9 |
| | — |
| | 15.9 |
|
| Small cap | — |
| | 8.8 |
| | — |
| | 8.8 |
| | 3.9 |
| | — |
| | 3.9 |
|
| International | — |
| | 16.4 |
| | — |
| | 16.4 |
| | 9.3 |
| | — |
| | 9.3 |
|
| Emerging | — |
| | 3.5 |
| | — |
| | 3.5 |
| |
| Fixed income | — |
| | 72.7 |
| | — |
| | 72.7 |
| |
| Total common/collective trusts | $ | — |
| | $ | 136.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 136.6 |
| |
| Fixed income securities | | | 75.5 |
| | — |
| | 75.5 |
|
| Real estate | — |
| | — |
| | 5.0 |
| | 5.0 |
| | — |
| | 5.6 |
| | 5.6 |
|
| Total financial assets | $ | — |
| | $ | 136.6 |
| | $ | 5.0 |
| | $ | 141.6 |
| |
| Total investments in the fair value hierarchy | | | $ | 106.6 |
| | $ | 5.6 |
| | $ | 112.2 |
|
The Company’s Pension Plan assets include one security that the Company considers to be a Level 3 assetdoes not have participant redemption restrictions for valuation purposes. This security is an investment in a real estate joint venture and requires the use of unobservable inputs in its fair value measurement. The fair value of this asset as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $5.5 million and $5.0 million, respectively. The change in reported fair value was the result of $0.5 million change in unrealized gain for 2015.
common/collective trust investments. The following table representssets forth additional disclosures for the Pension Plan's Level 3 financial instrument and the valuation technique used to measure thePlans assets fair value of the financial instrument.estimated using net asset value per share:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | | | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Instrument | | Principal Valuation Technique | | Fair Value | | Fair Value |
| Real estate | | Appraisal of underlying asset | | $ | 5.5 |
| | $ | 5.0 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | | Fair Value | | Redemptions Frequency (if currently eligible) | | Redemption Notice Period |
| December 31, 2017 | | $ | 113.7 |
| | Daily | | 15 Days |
| | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2016 | | $ | 106.6 |
| | Daily | | 15 Days |
Plan Financial Information — Net periodic benefit expense (income) for the Pension and Postretirement Benefits recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in "Compensation and benefits" includes the following components for the years ended December 31:
| | | | Pension | | Postretirement Benefits | Pension | | Postretirement Benefits |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Settlement charges | $ | 14.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| |
| Settlement charge | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 14.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Interest cost | 9.4 |
| | 10.8 |
| | 9.6 |
| | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| 6.6 |
| | 7.0 |
| | 9.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Expected return on plan assets | (5.8 | ) | | (7.3 | ) | | (7.3 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| (5.1 | ) | | (5.3 | ) | | (5.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Amortization of net actuarial loss | 8.5 |
| | 6.9 |
| | 7.7 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.4 |
| 4.6 |
| | 5.8 |
| | 8.7 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.2 |
|
| Amortization of prior service credit | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (0.6 | ) | | (0.6 | ) | | (0.6 | ) | |
| Amortization of prior service cost (credit) | | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | (0.4 | ) | | (0.6 | ) | | (0.6 | ) |
| Net periodic benefit expense (income) | $ | 26.1 |
| | $ | 10.4 |
| | $ | 10.0 |
| | $ | (0.4 | ) | | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 6.2 |
| | $ | 7.6 |
| | $ | 27.4 |
| | $ | (0.3 | ) | | $ | (0.4 | ) | | $ | (0.4 | ) |
The following tables are a summary of the amounts recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income and net periodic benefit expense (income) for the years ended December 31:
| | | | 2015 | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Pension | | Postretirement
Benefits | Pension | | Postretirement
Benefits |
| Settlement charges | $ | (14.0 | ) | | $ | — |
| |
| 2017 | | | | |
| Net actuarial loss | | $ | 15.3 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Amortization of net actuarial loss | | (4.6 | ) | | (0.1 | ) |
| Amortization of prior service (cost) credit | | (0.1 | ) | | 0.4 |
|
| Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss | | $ | 10.6 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
|
| Total recognized in net periodic benefit expense (income) | | 6.2 |
| | (0.3 | ) |
| Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss and net periodic benefit expense (income) | | $ | 16.8 |
| | $ | — |
|
| 2016 | | | | |
| Net actuarial loss (gain) | | $ | 3.5 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) |
| Amortization of net actuarial loss | | (5.8 | ) | | (0.2 | ) |
| Amortization of prior service credit | | (0.1 | ) | | 0.6 |
|
| Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss | | $ | (2.4 | ) | | $ | 0.3 |
|
| Total recognized in net periodic benefit expense (income) | | 7.6 |
| | (0.4 | ) |
| Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss and net periodic benefit expense (income) | | $ | 5.2 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) |
| 2015 | | | | |
| Settlement charge | | $ | (14.7 | ) | | $ | — |
|
| Net actuarial gain | (19.6 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | (19.3 | ) | | (0.3 | ) |
| Amortization of net actuarial loss | (8.5 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | (8.7 | ) | | (0.2 | ) |
| Amortization of prior service credit | — |
| | 0.6 |
| — |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Total recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (42.1 | ) | | $ | 0.1 |
| |
| Total recognized in other comprehensive loss | | $ | (42.7 | ) | | $ | 0.1 |
|
| Total recognized in net periodic benefit expense (income) | 26.1 |
| | (0.4 | ) | 27.4 |
| | (0.4 | ) |
| Total recognized in net periodic benefit expense (income) and other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (16.0 | ) | | $ | (0.3 | ) | |
| | 2014 | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Pension | | Postretirement Benefits | |
| Net actuarial loss | $ | 37.0 |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| |
| Amortization of net actuarial loss | (6.9 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | |
| Amortization of prior service credit | — |
| | 0.6 |
| |
| Total recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income | $ | 30.1 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| |
| Total recognized in net periodic benefit expense (income) | 10.4 |
| | (0.2 | ) | |
| Total recognized in net periodic benefit expense (income) and other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 40.5 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| |
| | 2013 | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Pension | | Postretirement Benefits | |
| Net actuarial gain | $ | (18.8 | ) | | $ | (1.2 | ) | |
| Amortization of net actuarial loss | (7.7 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | |
| Amortization of prior service credit | — |
| | 0.6 |
| |
| Total recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income | $ | (26.5 | ) | | $ | (1.0 | ) | |
| Total recognized in net periodic benefit expense (income) | 10.0 |
| | (0.1 | ) | |
| Total recognized in net periodic benefit expense (income) and other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (16.5 | ) | | $ | (1.1 | ) | |
| Total recognized in other comprehensive loss and net periodic benefit expense (income) | | $ | (15.3 | ) | | $ | (0.3 | ) |
The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service (cost) credit for the Pension that will be amortized from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” into “Net periodic benefit expense (income)” during 20162018 is $5.6$7.9 million ($3.56.1 million net of tax) and none,$0.1 million, respectively. The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service credit for the Postretirement Benefits that will be amortized from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” into “Net periodic benefit expense (income)” during 20162018 is $0.2$0.1 million ($0.1 million net of tax) and $0.6 million ($0.4 million net of tax), respectively.. There is no estimated prior service credit amortization during 2018 for the Postretirement Benefits.
The following tables are a summary of the benefit obligation and plan assets, changes to the benefit obligation and plan assets, and the fundedunfunded status of the Pension and Postretirement Benefits as of and for the years ended December 31:
| | | | Pension | | Postretirement Benefits | Pension | | Postretirement Benefits |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Change in benefit obligation: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Benefit obligation at the beginning of the year | $ | 266.0 |
| | $ | 233.6 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 1.4 |
| $ | 210.4 |
| | $ | 213.8 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
|
| Settlement impact | (14.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Interest cost | 9.4 |
| | 10.8 |
| | — |
| | 0.1 |
| 6.6 |
| | 7.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Actuarial (gain) loss | (25.9 | ) | | 36.4 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 0.2 |
| |
| Actuarial loss (gain) | | 19.1 |
| | 4.6 |
| | — |
| | (0.1 | ) |
| Benefits paid | (32.3 | ) | | (14.8 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | (20.3 | ) | | (15.0 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.1 | ) |
| Benefit obligation at the end of the year | $ | 203.2 |
| | $ | 266.0 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| $ | 215.8 |
| | $ | 210.4 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Pension | | Postretirement Benefits | |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | |
| Change in plan assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year | $ | 141.6 |
| | $ | 136.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 112.2 |
| | $ | 107.9 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Settlement impact | (14.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Actual return on plan assets | (0.4 | ) | | 6.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 8.8 |
| | 6.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Employer contributions | 13.0 |
| | 12.9 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.4 |
| 18.5 |
| | 13.2 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
|
| Benefits paid | (32.3 | ) | | (14.8 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | (20.3 | ) | | (15.0 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.1 | ) |
| Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year | $ | 107.9 |
| | $ | 141.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 119.2 |
| | $ | 112.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Unfunded status at the end of the year | $ | 95.3 |
| | $ | 124.4 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| $ | 96.6 |
| | $ | 98.2 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
|
In October 2017, the Society of Actuaries issued updated mortality projection scales. The unfunded status ofCompany adopted the Pensionupdated mortality projection scales on its measurement date, which decreased by $29.1 million as the Pension benefit obligation decreased $62.8 million and the fair value of the Pension Plan assets decreased $33.7 million duringbenefit obligation. In December 2017, the year.Company reevaluated the population of its SERP participants and determined the white-collar adjusted mortality table provided by the Society of Actuaries to be a better estimate for participants in the plan. Accordingly, the change in estimate resulted in an increase to the SERPs unfunded status. The unfunded status of the Pension Plan was $24.6$22.7 million and $41.9$27.7 million at December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively, and the unfunded status of the SERPs was $70.7$73.9 million and $82.5$70.5 million at December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively.
In January 2015, the Company announced a voluntary pension buyout whereby eligible deferred vested participants could elect to receive a lump-sum settlement of their remaining pension benefit. In June 2015, the Company paid out $31.3 million of Pension Plan assets to participants electing the settlement with a corresponding decrease in the Pension Plan liability. As a result, the Company recognized settlement charges for the Pension Plan of $14.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Additionally, the Company recognized a reduction in the projected benefit obligation for the Pension Plan of $51.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 due to the settlement and changes in the actuarial assumptions used to estimate the Pension Plan projected benefit obligation. Also, in October 2015, the Society of Actuaries issued updated mortality tables. The Company adopted the updated mortality tables on its measurement date which decreased the Pension benefit obligation.
The following table summarizes the components recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets relating to the Pension and Postretirement Benefits as of December 31:
| | | | Pension | | Postretirement Benefits | | Total | Pension | | Postretirement Benefits | | Total |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Pension and other postretirement benefits liability | $ | 95.3 |
| | $ | 124.4 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 96.3 |
| | $ | 125.7 |
| $ | 96.6 |
| | $ | 98.2 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 97.3 |
| | $ | 99.0 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net actuarial loss, net of tax | $ | 46.0 |
| | $ | 72.7 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | 46.8 |
| | $ | 73.8 |
| $ | 54.1 |
| | $ | 46.5 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | 54.6 |
| | $ | 47.0 |
|
| Prior service cost (credit), net of tax | 0.2 |
| | 0.1 |
| | (0.7 | ) | | (1.0 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | | (0.9 | ) | 0.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 0.2 |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 46.2 |
| | $ | 72.8 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | 46.3 |
| | $ | 72.9 |
| $ | 54.3 |
| | $ | 46.7 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | 54.8 |
| | $ | 47.0 |
|
The following table summarizes the benefit obligation and accumulated benefit obligation for the Pension Plan, SERPs and Postretirement Benefits fair value of plan assets as of December 31:
| | | | Pension Plan | | SERPs | | Postretirement Benefits | Pension Plan | | SERPs | | Postretirement Benefits |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Benefit obligation | $ | 132.5 |
| | $ | 183.5 |
| | $ | 70.7 |
| | $ | 82.5 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| $ | 141.9 |
| | $ | 139.9 |
| | $ | 73.9 |
| | $ | 70.5 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
|
| Accumulated benefit obligation | 132.5 |
| | 183.5 |
| | 70.4 |
| | 79.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 141.9 |
| | 139.9 |
| | 73.8 |
| | 70.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fair value of plan assets | 107.9 |
| | 141.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 119.2 |
| | 112.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
The following table summarizes the estimated future benefit payments for the Pension and Postretirement Benefits for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021-2025 | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023-2027 |
| Pension | $ | 17.6 |
| | $ | 15.2 |
| | $ | 16.1 |
| | $ | 14.8 |
| | $ | 14.6 |
| | $ | 67.4 |
| $ | 29.5 |
| | $ | 15.1 |
| | $ | 15.0 |
| | $ | 14.7 |
| | $ | 14.3 |
| | $ | 64.1 |
|
| Postretirement Benefits | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.3 |
| 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.2 |
|
Although the Company has no minimum required contribution for the Pension Plan in 2016,2018, we expect to contribute $8.0 million to the Pension Plan in 2016.2018. The Company will continue to make contributions to the SERPs and the Postretirement Benefits to the extent benefits are paid. Aggregate benefits paid for the unfunded plans are expected to be $7.9$7.0 million in 2016.2018.
Employee Savings Plan — The Company has an employee savings plan that qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Contributions to, and costs of, the 401(k) defined contribution plan totaled $4.8 million, $5.1 million and $4.4 million $4.1 millionin 2017, 2016 and $4.1 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
International Benefit Plans — The Company’s international subsidiaries have certain defined contribution benefit plans. Contributions to, and costs related to, international plans were $2.8 million, $2.0 million and $1.7 million $2.4 millionfor 2017, 2016 and $1.9 million for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Deferred Compensation Plans — During 2015 the Company dissolved the rabbi trusts associated with the deferred compensation plan. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had a liability related to the deferred compensation plans of $0.2 million and $2.0 million, respectively, recorded in the “Accounts payable and other liabilities” line in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The rabbi trust had no market value at December 31, 2015 and $10.0 million at December 31, 2014, recorded in “Other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company made payments relating to the deferred compensation plans totaling $1.9 million and $0.4 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Note 1110 — Stockholders' Deficit
Common Stock — The Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, provides for the issuance of up to 162,500,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01. The holders of MoneyGram common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted upon by its stockholders. The holders of common stock have no preemptive, conversion or other subscription rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock. The determination to pay dividends on common stock will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on applicable laws and the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, cash requirements, prospects and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. The Company’s ability to declare or pay dividends or distributions to the holders of the Company’s common stock is restricted under the Company’s 2013 Credit Agreement. No dividends were paid in 2015, 20142017, 2016 or 2013.2015.
Preferred Stock — The Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides for the issuance of up to 7,000,000 shares of preferred stock that may be issued in one or more series, with each series to have certain rights and preferences as shall be determined in the unlimited discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, including, without limitation, voting rights, dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption privileges and liquidation preferences.
Series D Participating Convertible Preferred Stock — In 2011, the Company issued 173,189 shares of D Stock to Goldman Sachs. Each share of D Stock has a liquidation preference of $0.01 and is convertible into 125 shares of common stock by a stockholder other than Goldman Sachs which receives such shares by means of (i) a widespread public distribution, (ii) a transfer to an underwriter for the purpose of conducting a widespread public distribution, (iii) a transfer in which no transferee (or group of associated transferees) would receive 2 percent2% or more of any class of voting securities of the Company, or (iv) a transfer to a transferee that would control more than 50 percent50% of the voting securities of the Company without any transfer from such transferor or its affiliates as applicable (each of (i) — (iv), a “Widely Dispersed Offering”). The D Stock is non-voting while held by Goldman Sachs or any holder which receives such shares by any means other than a Widely Dispersed Offering (a “non-voting holder”). Holders of D Stock other than Goldman Sachs and non-voting holders vote as a single class with the holders of the common stock on an as-converted basis. The D Stock also participates in any dividends declared on the common stock on an as-converted basis.
Treasury Stock — The Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of a total of 12,000,000 shares. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company has repurchased 8,277,0739,842,509 shares of common stock under this authorization and has remaining authorization to repurchase up to 3,722,9272,157,491 shares.
The following table is a summary of the Company’s authorized, issued and outstanding stock as of December 31:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | D Stock | | Common Stock | | Treasury Stock |
| (Shares in thousands) | Authorized | | Issued | | Outstanding | | Authorized | | Issued | | Outstanding | |
| December 31, 2012 | 200 |
| | 109 |
| | 109 |
| | 162,500 |
| | 62,264 |
| | 57,857 |
| | (4,407 | ) |
| Stock options exercised and release of restricted stock units | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 106 |
| | 106 |
|
| December 31, 2013 | 200 |
| | 109 |
| | 109 |
| | 162,500 |
| | 62,264 |
| | 57,963 |
| | (4,301 | ) |
| Conversion of Series D convertible shares | — |
| | (38 | ) | | (38 | ) | | — |
| | 4,745 |
| | 4,745 |
| | — |
|
| Repurchase and retirement of shares | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8,185 | ) | | (8,185 | ) | | — |
|
| Stock repurchase | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,514 | ) | | (1,514 | ) |
| Stock options exercised and release of restricted stock units | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 81 |
| | 81 |
|
| December 31, 2014 | 200 |
| | 71 |
| | 71 |
| | 162,500 |
| | 58,824 |
| | 53,090 |
| | (5,734 | ) |
| Stock repurchase | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (49 | ) | | (49 | ) |
| Release of restricted stock units | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 171 |
| | 171 |
|
| December 31, 2015 | 200 |
| | 71 |
| | 71 |
| | 162,500 |
| | 58,824 |
| | 53,212 |
| | (5,612 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | D Stock | | Common Stock | | Treasury Stock |
| (Shares in thousands) | Authorized | | Issued | | Outstanding | | Authorized | | Issued | | Outstanding | |
| January 1, 2015 | 200 |
| | 71 |
| | 71 |
| | 162,500 |
| | 58,824 |
| | 53,090 |
| | (5,734 | ) |
| Stock repurchase | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (49 | ) | | (49 | ) |
| Release for restricted stock units | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 171 |
| | 171 |
|
| December 31, 2015 | 200 |
| | 71 |
| | 71 |
| | 162,500 |
| | 58,824 |
| | 53,212 |
| | (5,612 | ) |
| Stock repurchase | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,565 | ) | | (1,565 | ) |
| Release for restricted stock units | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,118 |
| | 1,118 |
|
| December 31, 2016 | 200 |
| | 71 |
| | 71 |
| | 162,500 |
| | 58,824 |
| | 52,765 |
| | (6,059 | ) |
| Release for restricted stock units and stock options exercised | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,474 |
| | 1,474 |
|
| December 31, 2017 | 200 |
| | 71 |
| | 71 |
| | 162,500 |
| | 58,824 |
| | 54,239 |
| | (4,585 | ) |
Participation Agreement between the Investors and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. — THL and Goldman Sachs (collectively, the "Investors") have a Participation Agreement with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Walmart”), under which the Investors are obligated to pay Walmart certain percentages of any accumulated cash payments received by the Investors in excess of the Investors’ original investment in the Company. While the Company is not a party to, and has no obligations to Walmart or additional obligations to the Investors under, the Participation Agreement, the Company must recognize the Participation Agreement in its consolidated financial statements as the Company indirectly benefits from the agreement. Any future payments by the Investors to Walmart may result in an expense that could be material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations, but would have no impact on the Company’s cash flows. As liquidity events are dependent on many external factors and uncertainties, the Company does not consider a liquidity event to be probable at this time for any Investors, and has not recognized any further liability or expense related to the Participation Agreement.
As a result of the transactions occurring on April 2, 2014 described below, the Investors made a payment of approximately $0.6 million to Walmart under the Participation Agreement and the Company recognized expense and a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital for the year ended December 31, 2014. There were no payments under the Participation Agreement for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2013.
Equity Registration Rights Agreement — In connection with our recapitalization in 2008, the Company and the Investors entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Equity Registration Rights Agreement”) on March 25, 2008, as amended on May 18, 2011, with respect to the Series B Stock Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company, the Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company, D Stock and common stock owned by the Investors and their affiliates (collectively, the “Registrable Securities”). Under the terms of the Equity Registration Rights Agreement, the Company is required, after a specified holding period, to use the Company's reasonable best efforts to promptly file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a shelf registration statement relating to the offer and sale of the Registrable Securities. The Company is obligated to keep such shelf registration statement continuously effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), until the earlier of (1) the date as of which all of the Registrable Securities have been sold, (2) the date as of which each of the holders of the Registrable Securities is permitted to sell its Registrable Securities without registration pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act and (3) fifteen years. The holders of the Registrable Securities are also entitled to six demand registrations and unlimited piggyback registrations during the term of the Equity Registration Rights Agreement. The Company has filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC that permits the offer and sale of the Registrable Securities, as required by the terms of the Equity Registration Rights Agreement. The registration statement also permits the Company to offer and sell up to $500 million of its common stock, preferred stock, debt securities or any combination of these, from time to time, subject to market conditions and the Company’s capital needs.
Secondary Offering — On April 2, 2014, the Company completed an underwritten secondary public offering by the Investors of an aggregate of 9,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. As part of the transaction, the affiliates of Goldman Sachs converted an aggregate of 37,957 shares of D Stock to 4,744,696 shares of common stock, which were sold as part of the transaction. The selling stockholders received all of the proceeds from the offering. Also on April 2, 2014, the Company completed the repurchase of 8,185,092 shares of common stock from the THL selling stockholders at a price of $16.25 per share. The Company funded the share repurchase with $130.0 million of the proceeds from its Tranche B-1 Term Loan Facility and cash.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss — The following table details the components of “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” as of December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net unrealized gains on securities classified as available-for-sale, net of tax | $ | 11.1 |
| | $ | 11.2 |
| $ | 2.2 |
| | $ | 10.8 |
|
| Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax | (13.5 | ) | | (5.4 | ) | (10.4 | ) | | (19.9 | ) |
| Pension and Postretirement Benefits adjustments, net of tax | (46.3 | ) | | (72.9 | ) | (54.8 | ) | | (47.0 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (48.7 | ) | | $ | (67.1 | ) | $ | (63.0 | ) | | $ | (56.1 | ) |
The following table is a summary of the changes to "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" by component during 20152017, 20142016 and 20132015:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | Net unrealized gains on securities classified as available-for-sale, net of tax | | Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax | | Pension and Postretirement Benefits adjustments, net of tax | | Total | Net unrealized gains on securities classified as available-for-sale, net of tax | | Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax | | Pension and Postretirement Benefits adjustments, net of tax | | Total |
| December 31, 2012 | $ | 16.3 |
| | $ | 2.6 |
| | $ | (71.2 | ) | | $ | (52.3 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive income before amortization | 5.1 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 12.6 |
| | 18.6 |
| |
| January 1, 2015 | | $ | 11.2 |
| | $ | (5.4 | ) | | $ | (75.4 | ) | | $ | (69.6 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before amortization | | 1.3 |
| | (8.1 | ) | | 12.5 |
| | 5.7 |
|
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | (4.1 | ) | | — |
| | 4.8 |
| | 0.7 |
| (1.4 | ) | | — |
| | 14.5 |
| | 13.1 |
|
| Net current period other comprehensive income | 1.0 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 17.4 |
| | 19.3 |
| |
| December 31, 2013 | $ | 17.3 |
| | $ | 3.5 |
| | $ | (53.8 | ) | | $ | (33.0 | ) | |
| Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | | (0.1 | ) | | (8.1 | ) | | 27.0 |
| | 18.8 |
|
| January 1, 2016 | | 11.1 |
| | (13.5 | ) | | (48.4 | ) | | (50.8 | ) |
| Other comprehensive loss before amortization | (0.2 | ) | | (8.9 | ) | | (23.2 | ) | | (32.3 | ) | — |
| | (6.4 | ) | | (2.1 | ) | | (8.5 | ) |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | (5.9 | ) | | — |
| | 4.1 |
| | (1.8 | ) | (0.3 | ) | | — |
| | 3.5 |
| | 3.2 |
|
| Net current period other comprehensive loss | (6.1 | ) | | (8.9 | ) | | (19.1 | ) | | (34.1 | ) | |
| December 31, 2014 | $ | 11.2 |
| | $ | (5.4 | ) | | $ | (72.9 | ) | | $ | (67.1 | ) | |
| Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | | (0.3 | ) | | (6.4 | ) | | 1.4 |
| | (5.3 | ) |
| December 31, 2016 | | 10.8 |
| | (19.9 | ) | | (47.0 | ) | | (56.1 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification | 1.3 |
| | (8.1 | ) | | 12.7 |
| | 5.9 |
| 3.6 |
| | 9.5 |
| | (10.6 | ) | | 2.5 |
|
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1.4 | ) | | — |
| | 13.9 |
| | 12.5 |
| (12.2 | ) | | — |
| | 2.8 |
| | (9.4 | ) |
| Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income | (0.1 | ) | | (8.1 | ) | | 26.6 |
| | 18.4 |
| (8.6 | ) | | 9.5 |
| | (7.8 | ) | | (6.9 | ) |
| December 31, 2015 | $ | 11.1 |
| | $ | (13.5 | ) | | $ | (46.3 | ) | | $ | (48.7 | ) | |
| December 31, 2017 | | $ | 2.2 |
| | $ | (10.4 | ) | | $ | (54.8 | ) | | $ | (63.0 | ) |
The following table is a summary of the significant amounts reclassified out of each component of "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" during the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | Statement of Operations Location | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | Statement of Operations Location |
| Change in unrealized gains on securities classified as available-for-sale, before tax | $ | (1.4 | ) | | $ | (5.7 | ) | | $ | (5.7 | ) | "Investment revenue" | |
| Tax (benefit) expense, net | — |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 1.6 |
| | |
| Change in net unrealized gains on securities classified as available-for-sale, before tax | | $ | (12.2 | ) | | $ | (0.4 | ) | | $ | (1.4 | ) | "Investment revenue" |
| Tax expense (benefit) | | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| |
| Total, net of tax | $ | (1.4 | ) | | $ | (5.9 | ) | | $ | (4.1 | ) | | $ | (12.2 | ) | | $ | (0.3 | ) | | $ | (1.4 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension and Postretirement Benefits adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization of prior service credits | $ | (0.6 | ) | | $ | (0.6 | ) | | $ | (0.6 | ) | "Compensation and benefits" | |
| Amortization of net actuarial losses | 8.7 |
| | 7.2 |
| | 8.1 |
| "Compensation and benefits" | |
| Settlement charges | 14.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| "Compensation and benefits" | |
| Amortization of prior service credit | | $ | (0.3 | ) | | $ | (0.5 | ) | | $ | (0.6 | ) | "Compensation and benefits" |
| Amortization of net actuarial loss | | 4.7 |
| | 6.0 |
| | 8.9 |
| "Compensation and benefits" |
| Settlement charge | | — |
| | — |
| | 14.7 |
| "Compensation and benefits" |
| Total before tax | 22.1 |
| | 6.6 |
| | 7.5 |
| | 4.4 |
| | 5.5 |
| | 23.0 |
| |
| Tax benefit, net | (8.2 | ) | | (2.5 | ) | | (2.7 | ) | | (1.6 | ) | | (2.0 | ) | | (8.5 | ) | |
| Total, net of tax | $ | 13.9 |
| | $ | 4.1 |
| | $ | 4.8 |
| | $ | 2.8 |
| | $ | 3.5 |
| | $ | 14.5 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total reclassified for the period, net of tax | $ | 12.5 |
| | $ | (1.8 | ) | | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | (9.4 | ) | | $ | 3.2 |
| | $ | 13.1 |
| |
Note 1211 — Stock-Based Compensation
The MoneyGram International, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2005 Plan”) provides for the granting of equity-based compensation awards, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards (collectively, “share-based awards”) to officers, employees and directors. In May 2015, the Company's stockholders approved an amendment and restatement of the 2005 Plan increasing the aggregate number of shares that may be issued from 12,925,000 to 15,425,000 shares. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company has remaining authorization to issue future grants of up to 7,373,6643,050,592 shares.
The calculated fair value of share-based awards is recognized as compensation cost using the straight-line method over the vesting or service period in the Company’s financial statements. Stock-based compensation is recognized only for those options and restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights expected to vest, with forfeitures estimated at the date of grant and evaluated and adjusted periodically to reflect the Company’s historical experience and future expectations. Any change in the forfeiture assumption will be accounted for as a change in estimate, with the cumulative effect of the change on periods previously reported being reflected in the financial statements of the period in which the change is made.
The following table is a summary of the Company's stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Expense recognized related to stock options | $ | 4.6 |
| | $ | 6.2 |
| | $ | 6.7 |
| $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | 2.8 |
| | $ | 4.6 |
|
| Expense recognized related to restricted stock units | 15.0 |
| | (0.8 | ) | | 4.5 |
| 14.0 |
| | 15.1 |
| | 15.0 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | $ | 19.6 |
| | $ | 5.4 |
| | $ | 11.2 |
| $ | 14.5 |
| | $ | 17.9 |
| | $ | 19.6 |
|
Stock Options —Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. All outstanding stock options contain certain forfeiture and non-compete provisions.
There were no options granted in 2017, 2016 or 2015. All options granted in 2014, 2013 and 2012 have a term of 10 years. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2011, options issued were either time based, vesting over a four-year period, or performance based, vesting over a five-year period. All options issued after the fourth quarter of 2011 are time-based, with options granted in the fourth quarter of 2011 through the first part of 2014 vesting over a four-year period, and the remaining options granted in 2014 vesting over a three-year period, in an equal number of shares each year.
For purposes of determining the fair value of stock option awards, the Company uses the Black-Scholes single option pricing model for time-based and performance-based tranches. The following table provides weighted-average grant-date fair value and assumptions utilized to estimate the grant-date fair value of the options granted during the years ended December 31:
|
| | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
Expected dividend yield(1) | 0.0% | | 0.0% |
Expected volatility(2) | 64.6% - 68.2% | | 68.2%-69.0% |
Risk-free interest rate(3) | 1.1% - 2.1% | | 1.1%-1.2% |
Expected life(4) | 6.0 - 6.3 years | | 6.3 years |
| Weighted-average grant-date fair value per option | $10.99 | | $10.51 |
| |
(1) | Expected dividend yield represents the level of dividends expected to be paid on the Company’s common stock over the expected term of the option. The Company does not anticipate declaring any dividends at this time. |
| |
(2) | Expected volatility is the amount by which the Company’s stock price has fluctuated or will fluctuate during the expected term of the option. The Company’s expected volatility is calculated based on the historical volatility of the price of the Company’s common stock since the spin-off from Viad Corporation on June 30, 2004. The Company also considers any known or anticipated factors that will likely impact future volatility. |
| |
(3) | The risk-free interest rate for the Black-Scholes model is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the option. |
| |
(4) | Expected life represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding. The expected life was determined using the simplified method as the pattern of changes in the value of the Company’s common stock and exercise activity since late 2007 has been inconsistent and substantially different from historical patterns. Additionally, there have been minimal stock option exercises which would be representative of the Company’s normal exercise activity since 2007. Accordingly, the Company does not believe that historical terms are relevant to the assessment of the expected term of the grant. Based on these factors, the Company does not believe that it has the ability to make a more refined estimate than the use of the simplified method. |
The following table is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2015:2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000,000) |
| Options outstanding at December 31, 2014 | 3,786,458 |
| | $ | 19.57 |
| | 6.3 years | | $ | — |
|
| Forfeited/Expired | (693,877 | ) | | 21.24 |
| | | | |
| Options outstanding at December 31, 2015 | 3,092,581 |
| | $ | 19.20 |
| | 5.2 years | | $ | — |
|
| Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2015 | 3,044,556 |
| | $ | 19.23 |
| | 5.2 years | | $ | — |
|
| Options exercisable at December 31, 2015 | 2,200,813 |
| | $ | 18.97 |
| | 4.5 years | | $ | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000,000) |
| Options outstanding at December 31, 2016 | 2,485,461 |
| | $ | 18.02 |
| | 4.0 years | | $ | — |
|
| Exercised | (112,297 | ) | | 14.44 |
| | | | |
| Forfeited/Expired | (353,314 | ) | | 20.85 |
| | | | |
| Options outstanding at December 31, 2017 | 2,019,850 |
| | $ | 17.72 |
| | 2.8 years | | $ | 0.6 |
|
| Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2017 | 2,019,844 |
| | $ | 17.72 |
| | 2.8 years | | $ | 0.6 |
|
| Options exercisable at December 31, 2017 | 2,015,249 |
| | $ | 17.72 |
| | 2.8 years | | $ | 0.6 |
|
The following table is a summary of the Company's stock option compensation information during the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Intrinsic value of options exercised | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Cash received from option exercises | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.4 |
| | $ | 1.1 |
| $ | 1.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Unrecognized stock option expense | $ | 4.2 |
| | | | | |
| Remaining weighted-average vesting period | 0.7 years |
| | | | | |
As of December 31, 2017, the Company had no unrecognized stock option expense related to outstanding options.
Restricted Stock Units — During 2013,In February 2017, the Company issued time-based and performance-based restricted stock units. The time-based restricted stock units vest in three equal installments on each anniversary of the grant date. The performance-based restricted stock units which are subject to three-year cliff vesting andperformance conditions that must be satisfied. If such performance conditions are satisfied at the conclusion of a one-year performance period, the performance-based restricted stock units will vest basedin three equal installments on the extent to which the performance goal is achieved during the performance period (2013-2015). The 2013 annual restricted stock unit awards are based on average annual Adjusted EBITDA growth. Under the termseach anniversary of the grant 50 percent ofdate. With respect to the performance-based restricted stock units, granted willup to 50% of such awards become eligible to vest over such three year period if a target level of Adjusted EBITDA is achieved for threshold performancethe year ended December 31, 2017. Adjusted EBITDA is EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and 100 percentamortization, including agent signing bonus amortization) adjusted for certain significant items. The other 50% of the performance-based restricted stock units granted willbecome eligible to vest over such three year period if a target level of revenue is achieved for the achievementyear ended December 31, 2017. The performance-based restricted stock units have a threshold level of average annual Adjusted EBITDA at target.performance for each of the target levels. Achievement of the threshold level will result in vesting of 50% of the target levels discussed above. The number of performance-based restricted stock units that will vest for performance achievement between the performance threshold and target will be determined based on a straight-line interpolation. No performance-based restricted stock units will vest for performance achievement below the threshold.thresholds.
In addition, a one-time contingentDuring 2016, the Company issued time-based and performance-based restricted stock unit award was issuedunits. The time-based restricted stock units vest in 2013. Vestingthree equal installments on each anniversary of the one-time contingent award is basedgrant date. The performance-based restricted stock units are subject to performance conditions that must be satisfied. If such performance conditions are satisfied at the conclusion of a one-year performance period, the performance-based restricted stock units will vest in three equal installments on each anniversary of the achievement bygrant date. With respect to the Companyperformance-based restricted stock units, up to 50% of such awards become eligible to vest over such three year period if a target level of Adjusted EBITDA is achieved for the compound average growth rate ("CAGR") of revenue during the three year performance period. If the performance goalended December 31, 2016. Adjusted EBITDA is attained at the endEBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, including agent signing bonus amortization) adjusted for certain significant items. The other 50% of the performance period, the performance award will vest and eligible participants will receive the value of their award. CAGR is a non-GAAP financial measure used by the Company in the budget and reporting process.
During 2014, the Company issued performance-based restricted stock units which are subjectbecome eligible to three-year cliff vesting, based on average annual Adjusted EBITDA growth and Digital/Self-Servicevest over such three year period if a target level of Digital revenue growth duringis achieved for the applicable performance period (2014 - 2016). Under the terms of theyear ended December 31, 2016. The performance-based restricted stock units grantedhave a threshold level of performance for each of the target levels. Achievement of the threshold level will result in 2014,vesting of 50% of the target levels discussed above. The number of restricted stock units that will vest is determined based on the extent to which the performance goals are achieved. Under the terms of the grant, 50 percent of the restricted stock units granted will vest for threshold performance and 100 percent of the restricted stock units granted will vest for the achievement of average annual Adjusted EBITDA and Digital/Self-Service revenue at target. The number ofperformance-based restricted stock units that will vest for performance achievement between the performance threshold and target will be determined based on a straight-line interpolation. No performance-based restricted stock units will vest for performance achievement below the threshold.
In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company deemed the performance metrics for the 2011 and 2012 performance-based restricted stock units not probable of being attained. As such, the Company reversed $1.2 million of stock- based compensation expense. Also, in the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company deemed the performance metrics for the annual performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2013 and 2014 and the one-time contingent performance-based restricted stock units not probable of being attained. As such, the Company reversed $9.0 million of stock-based compensation expense. In addition, the Company materially modified certain of the terms of the above mentioned performance-based restricted stock units. The Company accounted for this as a modification of awards, treating the exchange as a cancellation of the original awards accompanied by the concurrent grant of replacement awards. The terms under certain of the 2013 annual restricted stock unit awards were modified to time-based restricted stock units and the performance metrics associated with the one-time contingent performance-based restricted stock unit awards were modified to exclude U.S. to U.S. walk-in revenue from the performance goal. Each award remains subject to three-year cliff vesting. The terms under certain of the 2014 annual awards, which are subject to three-year cliff vesting, were modified to exclude annual Adjusted EBITDA growth as a performance metric. The modified 2014 annual awards will only use average annual adjusted Digital/Self-Service revenue growth as a performance target during the applicable performance period. The modifications to these awards affected 389 employees.
The incremental compensation cost of $4.2 million was measured as the excess of the fair value of the replacement award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification date. The incremental costs will be amortized over the remaining term of the exchanged restricted stock unit award.thresholds.
During 2015, the Company issued performance-based restricted stock units, which are subject to a one-year performance period, based on annual Adjusted EBITDA and Digital/Self-ServiceDigital revenue for the fiscal year 2015. Under the terms of the restricted stock units agreement granted in 2015, the number of restricted stock units that will vest is determined based on the extent to which the performance goals are achieved. Under the terms of the grant, 50 percent50% of the restricted stock units granted will vest for threshold performance and 100 percent100% of the restricted stock units granted will vest for the achievement of the annual Adjusted EBITDA and Digital/Self-ServiceDigital revenue at target. Upon achievement of the performance goal, each award vests ratably over a three-year period from the grant date. The number of restricted stock units that will vest for performance achievement between the performance threshold and target will be determined based on a straight-line interpolation. No restricted stock units will vest for performance achievement below the threshold.
For purposes of determining the fair value of restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units, the fair value is calculated based on the stock price at the time of grant. For performance-based restricted stock units, expense is recognized if achievement of the performance goal is deemed probable, with the amount of expense recognized based on the Company’s best estimate of the ultimate achievement level. For the performance-based restricted stock units, the grant-date fair values at the threshold and target performance levels are $12.7 million and $25.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company believes it is probable that it will achieve the performance goal atgoals between the target level for the 2015 restricted stock unitsthreshold and the one-time contingent performance-based restricted stock unit award issued in 2013 and will achieve the thresholdtarget levels for the modified 2014 annual awards.2017 restricted stock units. For grants to employees, expense is recognized in the “Compensation and benefits” line and expense for grants to Directors is recorded in the “Transaction and operations support” line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations using the straight-line method over the vesting period.
The following table is a summary of the Company’s restricted stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2015:2017:
| | | | Total Shares | | Weighted Average Price | | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000,000) | Total Shares | | Weighted Average Price | | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000,000) |
| Restricted stock units outstanding at December 31, 2014 | 1,701,607 |
| | $ | 15.77 |
| | 1.4 years | | $ | 15.5 |
| |
| Restricted stock units outstanding at December 31, 2016 | | 4,630,038 |
| | $ | 7.68 |
| | 0.9 years | | $ | 54.7 |
|
| Granted | 3,043,012 |
| | 8.62 |
| | | 1,361,986 |
| | 12.87 |
| | |
| Vested and converted to shares | (233,245 | ) | | 17.63 |
| | | (2,040,682 | ) | | 7.61 |
| | |
| Forfeited | (348,806 | ) | | 12.07 |
| | | (684,430 | ) | | 12.98 |
| | |
| Restricted stock units outstanding at December 31, 2015 | 4,162,568 |
| | $ | 10.68 |
| | 1.0 year | | $ | 26.1 |
| |
| Restricted stock units vested and outstanding at December 31, 2015 | 256,388 |
| | $ | 8.39 |
| | | | $ | 1.6 |
| |
| Restricted stock units outstanding at December 31, 2017 | | 3,266,912 |
| | $ | 8.78 |
| | 0.7 years | | $ | 43.1 |
|
| Restricted stock units vested and outstanding at December 31, 2017 | | 32,680 |
| | $ | 6.12 |
| |
| | $ | 0.4 |
|
The following table is a summary of the Company's restricted stock and restricted stock unit compensation information for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Market value of restricted stock units vested during the year | $ | 6.3 |
| | $ | 1.5 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| |
| Fair value of restricted stock units vested during the year | | $ | 15.5 |
| | $ | 15.9 |
| | $ | 6.3 |
|
As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s outstanding restricted stock units had unrecognized compensation expense of $13.7 million with a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.2 years. Unrecognized restricted stock unit expense and the remaining weighted-average vesting period are presented underusing the Company’s current estimate of achievement of performance goals. Unrecognized restricted stock unit expense, as of December 31, 2015, under the minimum and maximum thresholds are $19.9 million and $23.1 million, respectively.
Note 1312 — Income Taxes
The following table is a summary of the components of income (loss) income before income taxes for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| U.S. | $ | (45.2 | ) | | $ | 66.4 |
| | $ | 69.9 |
| $ | (64.1 | ) | | $ | 28.7 |
| | $ | (46.5 | ) |
| Foreign | 16.1 |
| | 6.2 |
| | 15.4 |
| 27.5 |
| | 13.8 |
| | 16.1 |
|
| (Loss) income before income taxes | $ | (29.1 | ) | | $ | 72.6 |
| | $ | 85.3 |
| $ | (36.6 | ) | | $ | 42.5 |
| | $ | (30.4 | ) |
Foreign income consists of income and losses from the Company’s international subsidiaries. Most of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries recognize revenue based solely on services agreements with the primary U.S. operating subsidiary. The following table is a summary of the income tax expense for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Current: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | 17.7 |
| | $ | (10.3 | ) | | $ | 9.7 |
| $ | (14.7 | ) | | $ | 5.2 |
| | $ | 17.7 |
|
| State | (0.5 | ) | | 1.5 |
| | 0.1 |
| 1.6 |
| | 1.8 |
| | (0.5 | ) |
| Foreign | 5.0 |
| | 3.8 |
| | 11.1 |
| 11.2 |
| | 12.3 |
| | 5.0 |
|
| Current income tax expense (benefit) | 22.2 |
| | (5.0 | ) | | 20.9 |
| |
| Deferred income tax expense | 25.6 |
| | 5.5 |
| | 12.0 |
| |
| Income tax expense | $ | 47.8 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | 32.9 |
| |
| Current income tax expense | | (1.9 | ) | | 19.3 |
| | 22.2 |
|
| Deferred: | | | | | | |
| Federal | | (4.5 | ) | | 4.0 |
| | 21.3 |
|
| State | | 0.1 |
| | 1.3 |
| | (0.8 | ) |
| Foreign | | (0.5 | ) | | 2.0 |
| | 4.6 |
|
| Deferred income tax (benefit) expense | | (4.9 | ) | | 7.3 |
| | 25.1 |
|
| Income tax (benefit) expense | | $ | (6.8 | ) | | $ | 26.6 |
| | $ | 47.3 |
|
As of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company had a tax payable of $16.9$35.4 million recorded in “Accounts payable and other liabilities” and a tax receivable of $6.3$25.7 million recorded in the “Other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2014,2016, the Company had a net income tax payable of $53.2$27.7 million recorded in “Accounts payable and other liabilities” lineand a tax receivable of $4.7 million recorded in the "Other assets" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following table is a reconciliation of the expected federal income tax (benefit) expense at statutory rates to the actual income tax expense for the years ended in December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Income tax (benefit) expense at statutory federal income tax rate | $ | (10.2 | ) | | $ | 25.4 |
| | $ | 29.8 |
| |
| Income tax expense (benefit) at statutory federal income tax rate | | $ | (12.8 | ) | | $ | 14.9 |
| | $ | (10.7 | ) |
| Tax effect of: | | | | | | | | | | |
| State income tax, net of federal income tax effect | (0.6 | ) | | 1.5 |
| | 1.7 |
| 0.2 |
| | 0.6 |
| | (0.6 | ) |
| Valuation allowance | (1.0 | ) | | (13.0 | ) | | (2.7 | ) | (3.8 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | (1.0 | ) |
| International taxes | 1.1 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 3.2 |
| (3.0 | ) | | (1.4 | ) | | 1.1 |
|
| Net permanent difference | 1.2 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 0.2 |
| 30.2 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 1.2 |
|
| Decrease in tax reserve | (8.8 | ) | | (20.3 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | |
| Stock options | 3.4 |
| | 6.0 |
| | 1.6 |
| |
| Change in tax reserve | | 1.9 |
| | 9.1 |
| | (8.8 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation | | (1.5 | ) | | 3.8 |
| | 3.4 |
|
| Estimated impact from the TCJA | | (22.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Deferred charge amortization | | 4.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Effect of U.S. Tax Court decision | 64.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | 64.4 |
|
| Other | (1.7 | ) | | (1.1 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | 0.8 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | (1.7 | ) |
| Income tax expense | $ | 47.8 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | 32.9 |
| |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | | $ | (6.8 | ) | | $ | 26.6 |
| | $ | 47.3 |
|
In 2017, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $6.8 million on pre-tax loss of $36.6 million, primarily due to recently enacted tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "TCJA") as discussed in more detail below and an accrual related to the five-year deferred prosecution agreement (the "DPA") as further discussed in Note 13 — Commitments and Contingencies.
In 2016, the Company recognized a tax expense of $26.6 million on pre-tax income of $42.5 million, primarily due to a tax settlement reached with the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") on the matter discussed below and the reversal of tax benefits on share-based compensation.
In 2015, the Company recognized a tax expense of $47.8$47.3 million on a pre-tax loss of $29.1$30.4 million, primarily resulting from the decision of the U.S. Tax Court during the first quarter of 2015 related to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)IRS matter discussed in more detail below.
In 2014,On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the TCJA. The TCJA, among other things, contains significant changes to U.S. corporate tax laws, including a permanent reduction of the corporate income tax rate, a limitation on the deductibility of business interest expense, limitation of the deduction for certain net operating losses to 80% of current year taxable income, an indefinite net operating loss carryforward, immediate deductions for new investments in certain business assets instead of deductions for depreciation expense over time, modification or repeal of many business deductions and credits (including
certain foreign tax credits), a shift of the U.S. taxation of multinational corporations from a tax on worldwide income to a modified territorial system (retaining certain existing rules and containing new rules designed to include in the U.S. income tax base certain income generated in non-U.S. territories whether or not that income has been repatriated to the U.S.), a minimum taxing system related to payments deemed to erode the U.S. tax base, and a one-time tax on accumulated offshore earnings held in cash and illiquid assets (with the latter taxed at a lower rate). We continue to examine the impact the TCJA may have on the Company, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Although the Company does not consider its earnings in its foreign entities to be permanently reinvested, the deferred tax liability associated with the unremitted earnings of its foreign entities was revised under the TCJA by a one-time deemed mandatory repatriation of post-1986 undistributed foreign subsidiary earnings and profits (“E&P”) through the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company made a reasonable estimate for the one-time deemed mandatory repatriation and has recorded a provisional expense related its foreign E&P. The Company had an estimated $101.6 million of undistributed foreign E&P subject to the deemed mandatory repatriation. After the utilization of foreign tax credits related to undistributed foreign subsidiary E&P and other existing foreign tax credits, the Company expects a net zero liability associated with the deemed mandatory repatriation. As of December 31, 2016, a U.S. deferred tax liability of $5.2 million was recognized for the unremitted earnings of its foreign entities. However, the Company was able to make reasonable estimates of certain effects and, therefore, has recorded provisional amounts as follows:
As a result of the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% under the TCJA, the Company revalued its ending net deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2017 and recognized a provisional $19.8 million tax benefit in the Company’s consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The Company recognized a provisional net $3.0 million tax benefit for the remeasurement of previously recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities primarily associated with historical earnings in its foreign subsidiaries.
Subsequent to the enactment of the TCJA, the Company must make an accounting policy election to account for the tax effects of global intangible low-tax income either as a component of income tax expense in the period the tax arises, or as a component of $0.5 milliondeferred taxes on pre-tax incomethe related investments in foreign subsidiaries. The Company is currently evaluating these provisions of $72.6 million, resulting from reductions of uncertain tax positions of prior yearsthe TCJA and the tax treatment of the net securities gains which were partially offset by the reversal of tax benefits on canceled stock options.
In 2013, therelated implications and has not finalized its accounting policy election. The Company recognized a tax expense of $32.9 million on pre-tax income of $85.3 million, benefiting from proceeds on securities that resultwill finalize its accounting policy election in a release of valuation allowance, offset by international taxes and the reversal of tax benefits recorded on cancelled stock options for executive employee terminations.2018.
The following table is a summary of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | |
| Basis difference in revalued investments | $ | 101.5 |
| | $ | 97.6 |
| $ | 61.6 |
| | $ | 101.6 |
|
| Tax loss carryovers | 35.8 |
| | 50.1 |
| 22.3 |
| | 34.3 |
|
| Tax credit carryovers | 31.7 |
| | 30.2 |
| 18.0 |
| | 39.2 |
|
| Postretirement benefits and other employee benefits | 29.1 |
| | 47.7 |
| 17.1 |
| | 34.0 |
|
| Bad debt and other reserves | 4.3 |
| | 4.9 |
| 1.4 |
| | 4.2 |
|
| Other | 13.7 |
| | 14.6 |
| 13.2 |
| | 8.8 |
|
| Valuation allowance | (125.8 | ) | | (137.6 | ) | (75.9 | ) | | (124.2 | ) |
| Total deferred tax assets | 90.3 |
| | 107.5 |
| 57.7 |
| | 97.9 |
|
| Deferred tax liability: | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | (92.0 | ) | | (75.3 | ) | |
| Depreciation and amortization and other | | (62.7 | ) | | (100.8 | ) |
| Total deferred tax liability | (92.0 | ) | | (75.3 | ) | (62.7 | ) | | (100.8 | ) |
| Net deferred tax (liability) asset | $ | (1.7 | ) | | $ | 32.2 |
| |
| Net deferred tax liability | | $ | (5.0 | ) | | $ | (2.9 | ) |
As of December 31, 2015,2017, net deferred tax asset positions of $5.1$8.1 million arewere included in “Other assets” and net deferred tax liability positions of $6.8$13.1 million arewere included in “Accounts payable and other liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2014,2016, net deferred tax asset positions of $32.2$4.4 million were reflected in "Other assets" and net deferred tax liability positions of $7.3 million were included in "Accounts payable and other liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Valuation allowances relateThe valuation allowance as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 relates primarily to capital loss carryovers, basis differences in revalued investments, capital loss carryovers and, to a smaller extent, certain foreign tax loss carryovers.
At the end of 2015 and 2014, certain capital losses expired, resulting in decreases to tax loss carryovers and corresponding reductions in deferred tax assets and valuation allowances.
The following table is a summary of the amounts and expiration dates of tax loss carry-forwards (not tax effected) and credit carry-forwards as of December 31, 2015:2017:
|
| | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Expiration Date | | Amount |
| U.S. capital loss carry-forwards | 2016 - 2020 | | $ | 58.8 |
|
| U.S. net operating loss carry-forwards | 2020 - 2035 | | $ | 18.2 |
|
| U.S. tax credit carry-forwards | 2023 - 2035 | | $ | 9.9 |
|
| U.S. federal minimum tax credit carry-forwards | Indefinite | | $ | 21.8 |
|
The Company, and its subsidiaries, file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states and foreign jurisdictions. With a few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to foreign or U.S. federal, state and local income tax examinations for years prior to 2011. The Company is subject to foreign, U.S. federal and certain state income tax examinations for 2011 through 2014.
The IRS has completed its examination of the Company’s consolidated income tax returns through 2013 and issued Notices of Deficiency for 2005-2007 and 2009 and an Examination Report for 2008. The Notices of Deficiency disallow among other items approximately $900.0 million of deductions on securities losses in the 2007, 2008 and 2009 tax returns. In 2013, the Company reached a partial settlement with the IRS allowing ordinary loss treatment on $186.9 million of deductions in dispute. In January 2015, the U.S. Tax Court granted the IRS's motion for summary judgment upholding the remaining adjustments in the Notices of Deficiency. On July 27, 2015, the Company filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Tax Court. The U.S. Tax Court has transferred jurisdiction over the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
The Tax Court's decision is a change in facts which warranted reassessment of the Company's uncertain tax position. Although the Company believes that it has substantive tax law arguments in favor of its position and has appealed the ruling, the reassessment resulted in the Company determining that it is no longer more likely than not that its existing position will be sustained. Accordingly, the Company re-characterized certain deductions relating to securities losses to be capital in nature, rather than ordinary. The Company recorded a full valuation allowance against these losses in the quarter ended March 31, 2015. This change increased "Income tax expense" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the quarter ended March 31, 2015 by $63.7 million. During 2015, the Company made payments to the IRS of $61.0 million for federal tax payments and associated interest related to the matter. |
| | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Expiration Date | | Amount |
| U.S. capital loss carry-forwards | 2018 - 2022 | | $ | 44.2 |
|
| U.S. net operating loss carry-forwards | 2022 - 2037 | | $ | 13.8 |
|
| U.S. tax credit carry-forwards | 2024 - 2037 | | $ | 18.0 |
|
| U.S. federal minimum tax credit carry-forwards | Indefinite | | $ | 17.8 |
|
The IRS completed its examination of the Company’s consolidated income tax returns for the tax years 2011 through 2013 and issued a Revenue Agent Report (“RAR”) in the first quarter of 2015 that included disallowing $100.0 million of deductions related to payments the Company made to the United States government in connection with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania ("MDPA") and the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice ("U.S. DOJ"). The pursuant to the Deferred Prosecution Agreement. In April 2016, the Company filedentered into a protest letter contesting the adjustment and is now scheduled to discuss this mattersettlement agreement with the IRS Appeals Division in early 2016.allowing a deduction of $39.3 million. As of December 31, 2015,2016, the Company has recognized a cumulative incomehad fully settled this matter with $21.2 million of existing deferred tax benefitassets and $0.5 million of approximately $23.3cash after recognizing an additional $7.7 million of Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2016. The state tax liabilities related to these deductions.the federal settlement have yet to be settled due to the pending implications of the security losses under litigation.
Unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in “Accounts payable and other liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table is a reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Beginning balance | $ | 31.7 |
| | $ | 52.0 |
| | $ | 51.6 |
| $ | 24.2 |
| | $ | 30.5 |
| | $ | 31.7 |
|
| Additions based on tax positions related to prior years | 8.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.9 |
| 0.3 |
| | 11.2 |
| | 8.3 |
|
| Additions based on tax positions related to current year | 0.2 |
| | 2.7 |
| | — |
| 3.4 |
| | 4.6 |
| | 0.2 |
|
| Lapse in statute of limitations | — |
| | — |
| | (0.5 | ) | |
| Reductions for tax positions of prior years | (9.7 | ) | | (23.3 | ) | | — |
| |
| Settlements with cash or attributes | | — |
| | (21.4 | ) | | — |
|
| Foreign currency translation | | 0.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Reductions for tax positions of prior years and other | | — |
| | (0.7 | ) | | (9.7 | ) |
| Ending balance | $ | 30.5 |
| | $ | 31.7 |
| | $ | 52.0 |
| $ | 28.7 |
| | $ | 24.2 |
| | $ | 30.5 |
|
As of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, and 2014, the gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $28.7 million, $24.2 million and $30.5 million, respectively, exclusive of interest and $31.7penalties. For 2017 and 2016, the net amount of unrecognized tax benefits that if recognized could impact the effective tax rate was $17.3 million respectively,and $16.7 million, respectively. For 2015, all of whichthe unrecognized tax benefits could impact the effective tax rate if recognized. The increaseincreases in additions based on tax positions2017 were related to prior years is primarily due to a $6.5 million reclassification from accounts payable for the recharacterization of securities losses as discussed aboveforeign tax position consistent with no impact on our income tax expense.2016. The Company accrues interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits through “Income tax expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 theThe Company recorded approximately$2.5 million, $2.4 million and $1.9 million $0.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in interest and penalties in its Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company’s interestOperations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and penalties increased $2.7 million in 2015, related to the same reclassification from accounts payable as noted above, offset by a net income tax benefit of $0.8 million for a release of prior year positions.respectively. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the Company had a total of $4.5$8.9 million and $2.6$6.4 million, respectively, accrued for interest and penalties within "Accounts payable and other liabilities." As a result of the U.S. DOJ and security adjustments being appealed, as detailed above,Company's litigation related to its securities losses previously discussed, it is reasonably possible that there could be a significant increase or decrease to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months. However, as of December 31, 2015,2017, it is not possible to reasonably estimate the expected change to the total amount of unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months.
The Company does not consider its earnings in its foreign entities to be permanently reinvested. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, a deferred tax liability of $4.6 million and $6.3 million, respectively, was recognized for the unremitted earnings of its foreign entities.
Note 1413 — Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases — The Company has various non-cancelable operating leases for buildings, equipment and equipmentvehicles and other leases that terminate through 2024.2026. Certain of these leases contain rent holidays and rent escalation clauses based on pre-determined annual rate increases. The Company recognizes rent expense under the straight-line method over the term of the lease. Any difference between the straight-line rent amounts and amounts payable under the leases are recorded as deferred rent in “Accounts payable and other liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash or lease incentives received under certain leases are recorded as deferred rent when the incentive is received and amortized as a reduction to rent over the term of the lease using the straight-line method. Incentives received relating to tenant improvements are recognized as a reduction of rent expense under the straight-line method over the term of the lease. Tenant improvements are capitalized as leasehold improvements and depreciated over the shorter of the remaining term of the lease or 10 years. The deferred rent liability relating to these incentives was an asset of $0.2 million and $1.3 million atas of December 31, 20152017 and 2014, respectively.2016.
The following table is a summary of rent expense under operatingour leases for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Rent expense | $ | 17.8 |
| | $ | 18.0 |
| | $ | 16.2 |
| $ | 16.6 |
| | $ | 16.4 |
| | $ | 17.8 |
|
| Contingent rent | — |
| | — |
| | 0.2 |
| |
| Sublease agreements | (1.0 | ) | | (1.1 | ) | | (1.0 | ) | (0.3 | ) | | — |
| | (1.0 | ) |
| Rent expense under operating leases | $ | 16.8 |
| | $ | 16.9 |
| | $ | 15.4 |
| |
| Rent expense under leases | | $ | 16.3 |
| | $ | 16.4 |
| | $ | 16.8 |
|
The following table is a summary of the future minimum rental payments for all non-cancelable operating leases with an initial term of more than one year at December 31, 2015:2017:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | Future Minimum Lease Payments | Future Minimum Lease Payments |
| 2016 | $ | 12.5 |
| |
| 2017 | 10.4 |
| |
| 2018 | 9.4 |
| $ | 16.3 |
|
| 2019 | 8.6 |
| 14.7 |
|
| 2020 | 8.2 |
| 12.8 |
|
| 2021 | | 10.2 |
|
| 2022 | | 6.3 |
|
| Thereafter | 10.0 |
| 4.7 |
|
| Total | $ | 59.1 |
| $ | 65.0 |
|
Letters of Credit — At December 31, 2015,2017, the Company had no outstanding letters of credit. These letters of credit would reduce the amount available under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Minimum Commission Guarantees — In limited circumstances as an incentive to new or renewing agents, the Company may grant minimum commission guarantees for a specified period of time at a contractually specified amount. Under the guarantees, the Company will pay to the agent the difference between the contractually specified minimum commission and the actual commissions earned by the agent. Expenses related to the guarantee are recognized in the “Fee and other commissions expense” line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
As of December 31, 2015,2017, the liability for minimum commission guarantees was $3.2$1.2 million and the maximum amount that could be paid under the minimum commission guarantees was $11.3$2.1 million over a weighted-average remaining term of 1.90.6 years. The maximum payment is calculated as the contractually guaranteed minimum commission multiplied by the remaining term of the contract and, therefore, assumes that the agent generates no money transfer transactions during the remainder of its contract. However, under the terms of certain agent contracts, the Company may terminate the contract if the projected or actual volume of transactions falls beneath a contractually specified amount. MinimumThe Company made no payments on minimum commission guarantees in 2017 and paid in 2015 and 2014 were $0.2$2.4 million and $1.8 million, respectively, or 6 percent and 47 percent, respectively,80% of the estimated maximum payment for the year.in 2016.
Other Commitments — The Company has agreements with certain co-investors to provide funds related to investments in limited partnership interests. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the total amount of unfunded commitments related to these agreements was $0.3 million.
Legal Proceedings — The matters set forth below are subject to uncertainties and outcomes that are not predictable. The Company accrues for these matters as any resulting losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated. Further, the Company maintains insurance coverage for many claims and litigation alleged.matters. In relation to various legal matters, including those described below, the Company had $16.3$0.5 million and $17.3$1.2 million of liability recorded in the “Accounts payable and other liabilities” line in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively. A charge of $2.4 million, $12.8$0.9 million and $0.2$2.4 million were recorded in the “Transaction and operations support” line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during 2015, 20142017 and 2013,2015, respectively, for legal proceedings. A credit of $0.6 million was recorded in the "Transaction and operations support" line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during 2016 due to the reversal of certain legal settlement accruals.
Litigation Commenced Against the Company:
Class Action Securities Litigation -On April 15, 2015, a putative securities class action lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, County of New Castle, against MoneyGram, all of its directors, certain of its executive officers, THL, Goldman Sachs and the underwriters of the secondary public offering of the Company’s common stock that closed on April 2, 2014 (the “2014 Offering”). The lawsuit was brought by the Iron Workers District Council of New England Pension Fund seeking to represent a class consisting of all purchasers of the Company’s common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the Company’s registration statement and prospectus, and all documents incorporated by reference therein, issued in connection with the 2014 Offering. The lawsuit alleges violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), due to allegedly false and misleading statements in connection with the 2014 Offering and seeks unspecified damages and other relief. On May 19, 2015, MoneyGram and the other defendants filed a notice of removal to the federal district court of the District of Delaware. On June 18, 2015, the plaintiff filed a motion to remand the case back to Delaware State Court. The Company believes that the claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against the lawsuit. The Company is unable to predict the outcome, or the possible loss or range of loss, if any, related to this matter.
Other Matters — The Company is involved in various other claims and litigation that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of the Company's business. Management does not believe that after final disposition any of these matters is likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Government Investigations
State Civil Investigative DemandsOFAC — MoneyGram has received Civil Investigative Demands from a working group of nine state attorneys general who haveIn 2015, we initiated an internal investigation into whetherto identify any payments processed by the Company took adequate stepsthat were violations of the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC") sanctions regulations. We notified OFAC of the internal investigation, which was conducted in conjunction with the Company's outside counsel. On March 28, 2017, we filed a Voluntary Self-Disclosure with OFAC regarding the findings of our internal investigation. OFAC is currently reviewing the results of the Company’s investigation. At this time, it is not possible to preventdetermine the outcome of this matter, or the significance, if any, to our business, financial condition, or operations, and we cannot predict when OFAC will conclude their review of our Voluntary Self-Disclosure.
Deferred Prosecution Agreement — In November 2012, we announced that a settlement was reached with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (the "MDPA") and the U.S. Department of Justice ("U.S. DOJ") relating to the previously disclosed investigation of transactions involving certain of our U.S. and Canadian agents, as well as fraud complaint data and the consumer fraudanti-fraud program, during the period from 20072003 to 2014. On February 11, 2016, the Companyearly 2009. In connection with this settlement, we entered into a settlement agreementDPA with 49 statesthe MDPA and U.S. DOJ dated November 8, 2012.
On November 1, 2017, the Company agreed to a stipulation with the MDPA and the District of Columbia to settle any civil or administrative claims such attorneys general may have asserted under their consumer protection laws throughDOJ (collectively, the date“Government”) that the term of the settlement agreementCompany’s DPA be extended for 90 days to February 6, 2018. On January 31, 2018, the Company agreed with the Government that the term of the DPA be extended for an additional 45 days to March 23, 2018. The purpose of the extension is to provide the Company and the Government additional time to discuss whether the Company is in compliance with the DPA. There can be no assurance that the Company and the Government will continue to be able to negotiate a mutually satisfactory outcome during such 45 day period (or any further short-term extension of the DPA) or that such outcome will not include a further extension of the DPA, financial penalties or additional restrictions on the Company, including a monitorship period beyond the current monitorship that ends on April 30, 2018. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the Government will not seek any other remedy, including criminal prosecution and financial penalties, in lieu of an extension of the DPA and monitorship.
The Company has recorded an $85.0 million accrual in connection with a possible resolution of this matter, based on the investigation. Underfacts and circumstances known at the settlement agreement,time. However, the Company will make a non-refundable payment of $13.0 millionis unable to reasonably estimate the participating states toultimate loss and no assurance can be used by the states to provide restitution to consumers. The Company also agreed to implement certain enhancements to its compliance programgiven that future costs and provide periodic reports to the states party to the settlement agreement. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had accrued $13.0 millionpayments made in connection with this matter will not exceed the investigation.amount currently recorded or that the government will not also seek to impose non-monetary remedies or penalties.
Other Matters — The Company is involved in various other government inquiries and other matters that arise from time to time. Management does not believe that after final disposition any of these other matters is likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Actions Commenced by the Company:
CDO Litigation — In March 2012, the Company initiated an arbitration proceeding before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority against Goldman Sachs relating to the Company's purchase of Residential Mortgage Backed Securities and Collateral Debt Obligations from Goldman Sachs during 2005 through 2007, which the Company and Goldman Sachs agreed to settle in April 2014. In connection with this resolution, Goldman Sachs agreed to make a one-time payment, net of fees and certain expenses, to MoneyGram in the amount of $13.0 million, and to make a one-time payment of fees and expenses to MoneyGram’s legal counsel in the amount of $4.35 million. All amounts were paid in May 2014. This resolution terminated all litigation and arbitration between MoneyGram and Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs owns, together with certain of its affiliates, approximately 14 percent of the shares of the Company’s common stock on a diluted basis, assuming conversion of the D Stock currently owned by Goldman Sachs and its affiliates.
Certain litigation matters commenced by the Company were also settled during 2014, resulting in the recognition of an additional $32.4 million in securities settlements during 2014.
Tax Litigation — The IRS completed its examination of the Company’s consolidated income tax returns through 2013 and issued Notices of Deficiency for 2005-2007 and 2009, and an Examination Report for 2008. The Notices of Deficiency and Examination Report disallow, among other items, approximately $900$900.0 million of ordinary deductions on securities losses in the 2007, 2008 and 2009 tax returns. In May 2012 and December 2012, the Company filed petitions in the U.S. Tax Court challenging the 2005-2007 and 2009 Notices of Deficiency, respectively. In 2013, the Company reached a partial settlement with the IRS allowing ordinary loss treatment on $186.9 million of deductions in dispute. In January 2015, the U.S. Tax Court granted the IRS's motion for summary judgment upholding the remaining adjustments in the Notices of Deficiency. On July 27, 2015, theThe Company filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Tax Court. The U.S. Tax Court has transferred jurisdiction over the caseon July 27, 2015 for an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
The Oral arguments were held before the Fifth Circuit on June 7, 2016, and on November 15, 2016, the Fifth Circuit vacated the Tax Court's decision isand remanded the case to the Tax Court for further proceedings. The Company filed a motion for summary judgment in the Tax Court on May 31, 2017. On August 23, 2017, the IRS filed a motion for summary judgment and its response to the Company’s motion for summary judgment.
The January 2015 Tax Court decision was a change in facts which warranted reassessment of the Company's uncertain tax position. Although the Company believes that it has substantive tax law arguments in favor of its position and has appealed the ruling, the reassessment resulted in the Company determining that it is no longer more likely than not that its existing position will be sustained. Accordingly, the Company re-characterized certain deductions relating to securities losses to be capital in nature, rather than ordinary. The Company recorded a full valuation allowance against these losses in the quarter ended March 31, 2015. This change increased "Income tax expense" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the quarter ended March 31, 2015 by $63.7 million. During 2015, the Company made payments to the IRS of $61.0 million for federal tax payments and associated interest related to the matter. The November 2016 Fifth Circuit decision to remand the case back to the U.S. Tax Court does not change the Company’s current assessment regarding the likelihood that these deductions will be sustained. Accordingly, no change in the valuation allowance was made as of December 31, 2017. Pending the outcome of the Tax Court proceeding, the Company may be required to file amended state returns and make additional cash payments of up to $18.7 million on amounts that have previously been accrued.
Note 1514 — Segment Information
The Company’s reporting segments are primarily organized based on the nature of products and services offered and the type of consumer served. The Company has two reporting segments: Global Funds Transfer and Financial Paper Products. The Global Funds Transfer segment provides global money transfer services in more than 200 countries and territories. The Global Funds Transfer segment also provides bill payment services to consumers through substantially all of our money transfer agent and Company-operated locations in the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico, at certain agent locations in select Caribbean and European countries and through Digital/Self-ServiceDigital solutions. The Financial Paper Products segment aggregates the Money Order and Official Check operating segments as they have similar economic characteristics and meet the aggregation criteria as outlined in the accounting standards. The Financial Paper Products segment provides money orders to consumers through retail and financial institutions located in the U.S. and Puerto Rico, and provides official check services to financial institutions in the U.S. Walmart is our only agent, for both the Global Funds Transfer segment and the Financial Paper Products segment, that accounts for more than 10 percent10% of total revenue. In 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, Walmart accounted for 19 percent, 22 percent17%, 18% and 27 percent19% of total revenue, respectively.
The Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker reviews segment operating income and segment operating margin to assess segment performance and allocate resources. Segment accounting policies are the same as those described in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Investment revenue is allocated to each segment based on the average investable balances generated by that segment’s sale of payment instruments during the period.
All operating expenses that have not been classified in the above segments are reported as "Other." These unallocated expenses in 2017 include $10.8 million of legal expenses, Pension and Postretirement Benefits net periodic benefit expense of $5.9 million, outsourcing, independent contractor and consultant costs of $4.5 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $1.1 million and other net corporate costs of $5.7 million. Unallocated expenses in 2016 include $2.6 million of legal expenses, severance and related costs of $4.7 million, Pension and Postretirement Benefits net periodic benefit expense of $7.2 million and other net corporate costs of $12.0 million. Unallocated expenses in 2015 include $5.2 million of legal expenses, Pension and Postretirement Benefits net periodic benefit expense of $25.7$27.0 million and other net corporate costs of $2.5 million. Unallocated expenses in 2014 include $16.4 million of legal expenses related to the state Civil Investigative Demands accrual and other legal matters, as well as Pension and Postretirement Benefits net periodic benefit expense of $10.2 million and other net corporate cost of $5.5 million. Unallocated expenses in 2013 include $2.5 million of legal settlements in connection with MDPA and U.S. DOJ investigation and the shareholder litigation, $1.5 million of severance and related costs from executive terminations as well as other net corporate costs of $11.6 million.
The following table is a summary of the total revenue by segment for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Global Funds Transfer revenue | | | | | | | | | | |
| Money transfer revenue | $ | 1,262.7 |
| | $ | 1,274.5 |
| | $ | 1,287.8 |
| $ | 1,421.8 |
| | $ | 1,456.2 |
| | $ | 1,367.1 |
|
| Bill payment revenue | 98.7 |
| | 100.1 |
| | 102.0 |
| 86.3 |
| | 97.5 |
| | 98.7 |
|
| Total Global Funds Transfer revenue | 1,361.4 |
| | 1,374.6 |
| | 1,389.8 |
| 1,508.1 |
| | 1,553.7 |
| | 1,465.8 |
|
| Financial Paper Products revenue | | | | | | | | | | |
| Money order revenue | 51.0 |
| | 54.1 |
| | 55.1 |
| 55.0 |
| | 50.8 |
| | 51.0 |
|
| Official check revenue | 22.3 |
| | 26.2 |
| | 28.9 |
| 39.0 |
| | 24.8 |
| | 22.3 |
|
| Total Financial Paper Products revenue | 73.3 |
| | 80.3 |
| | 84.0 |
| 94.0 |
| | 75.6 |
| | 73.3 |
|
| Other revenue | — |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
| — |
| | 1.1 |
| | — |
|
| Total revenue | $ | 1,434.7 |
| | $ | 1,454.9 |
| | $ | 1,474.4 |
| $ | 1,602.1 |
| | $ | 1,630.4 |
| | $ | 1,539.1 |
|
The following table is a summary of the operating income by segment and detail of the (loss) income before income taxes for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Global Funds Transfer operating income | $ | 31.7 |
| | $ | 75.4 |
| | $ | 162.6 |
| $ | 4.9 |
| | $ | 95.8 |
| | $ | 31.7 |
|
| Financial Paper Products operating income | 17.9 |
| | 28.1 |
| | 30.9 |
| 31.8 |
| | 18.5 |
| | 17.9 |
|
| Total segment operating income | 49.6 |
| | 103.5 |
| | 193.5 |
| 36.7 |
| | 114.3 |
| | 49.6 |
|
| Other operating loss | (33.4 | ) | | (32.1 | ) | | (15.6 | ) | (28.0 | ) | | (26.5 | ) | | (34.7 | ) |
| Total operating income | 16.2 |
| | 71.4 |
| | 177.9 |
| 8.7 |
| | 87.8 |
| | 14.9 |
|
| Net securities gains | — |
| | 45.4 |
| | — |
| |
| Interest expense | (45.3 | ) | | (44.2 | ) | | (47.3 | ) | 45.3 |
| | 45.0 |
| | 45.3 |
|
| Debt extinguishment costs | — |
| | — |
| | (45.3 | ) | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
|
| (Loss) income before income taxes | $ | (29.1 | ) | | $ | 72.6 |
| | $ | 85.3 |
| $ | (36.6 | ) | | $ | 42.5 |
| | $ | (30.4 | ) |
The following table is a summary of depreciation and amortization expense by segment for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Global Funds Transfer | $ | 60.4 |
| | $ | 50.8 |
| | $ | 46.5 |
| $ | 66.5 |
| | $ | 71.8 |
| | $ | 60.4 |
|
| Financial Paper Products | 5.5 |
| | 4.4 |
| | 3.9 |
| 7.5 |
| | 7.4 |
| | 5.5 |
|
| Other | 0.2 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| 1.1 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 0.2 |
|
| Total depreciation and amortization | $ | 66.1 |
| | $ | 55.5 |
| | $ | 50.7 |
| $ | 75.1 |
| | $ | 79.9 |
| | $ | 66.1 |
|
The following table is a summary of capital expenditures by segment for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Global Funds Transfer | $ | 70.1 |
| | $ | 71.2 |
| | $ | 49.3 |
| $ | 76.4 |
| | $ | 68.2 |
| | $ | 70.1 |
|
| Financial Paper Products | 30.3 |
| | 16.7 |
| | 7.4 |
| 8.5 |
| | 10.9 |
| | 30.3 |
|
| Total capital expenditures | $ | 100.4 |
| | $ | 87.9 |
| | $ | 56.7 |
| $ | 84.9 |
| | $ | 79.1 |
| | $ | 100.4 |
|
Total assets by segment - Settlement assets, as defined in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, are allocated based on the corresponding payment service obligations that are specifically identified to each reporting segment. Property and equipment is specifically identified to both reporting segments with the exception of certain software, most of which is jointly used and allocated to each segment. There is an immaterial amount of software used for corporate purposes. The net carrying value of goodwill and intangibles all relates to the Global Funds Transfer segment as further summarized in Note 87 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets. While the derivatives portfolio is also managed on a consolidated level, each derivative instrument is utilized in a manner that can be identified to the Global Funds Transfer segment. All assets that are not specifically identified or allocated to each reporting segment are reported as "Other.” These assets primarily include reported cash and cash equivalents, which are the assets in excess of payment service obligations as further discussed in Note 98 - Debt, and various other corporate assets. The following table sets forth assets by segment as of December 31:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Global Funds Transfer | $ | 1,982.0 |
| | $ | 1,858.3 |
|
| Financial Paper Products | 2,326.4 |
| | 2,464.5 |
|
| Other | 196.8 |
| | 305.5 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 4,505.2 |
| | $ | 4,628.3 |
|
Geographic areas |
| | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Global Funds Transfer | $ | 2,333.4 |
| | $ | 2,213.9 |
|
| Financial Paper Products | 2,229.4 |
| | 2,198.3 |
|
| Other | 209.7 |
| | 185.2 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 4,772.5 |
| | $ | 4,597.4 |
|
Revenue by geographic area —International revenues are defined as revenues generated from money transfer and bill payment transactions originating in a country other than the U.S. There are no individual countries, other than the U.S., that exceed 10% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013.2015. The following table details total revenue by major geographic area for the years ended December 31:
| | | (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| U.S. | $ | 823.3 |
| | $ | 861.2 |
| | $ | 891.6 |
| $ | 854.0 |
| | $ | 865.8 |
| | $ | 829.7 |
|
| International | 611.4 |
| | 593.7 |
| | 582.8 |
| 748.1 |
| | 764.6 |
| | 709.4 |
|
| Total revenue | $ | 1,434.7 |
| | $ | 1,454.9 |
| | $ | 1,474.4 |
| $ | 1,602.1 |
| | $ | 1,630.4 |
| | $ | 1,539.1 |
|
Long-lived assetsNote 15 — Immaterial Error CorrectionLong-lived assets are defined
2017 Immaterial Error Correction
Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s 2016 financial statements, the Company’s management determined that there was an immaterial error with respect to the Pension Plan. Specifically, the error related to the calculation of the Company’s prior years' pension obligation. Accordingly, the prior period amounts within the consolidated financial statements and corresponding footnotes have been revised to reflect the correct balances. The adjustment has no impact to "Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as propertyof December 31, 2016 and equipment and signing bonuses. Long-lived assets are principally located in“Net cash provided by operating activities” on the U.S. The following table details total long-lived assets by major geographic areaConsolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31:31, 2016 and 2015.
The effects of the correction on the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | 2015 | | 2014 |
| U.S. | $ | 290.8 |
| | $ | 235.1 |
|
| International | 33.8 |
| | 31.3 |
|
| Total long-lived assets | $ | 324.6 |
| | $ | 266.4 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2016 | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions, except per share data) | | As Previously Reported | | Correction | | As Corrected | | | | | | |
| CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension and other postretirement benefits | | $ | 87.6 |
| | $ | 11.4 |
| | $ | 99.0 |
| | | | | | |
| Accounts payable and other liabilities | | 168.7 |
| | (4.2 | ) | | 164.5 |
| | | | | | |
| Total liabilities | | $ | 4,805.8 |
| | $ | 7.2 |
| | $ | 4,813.0 |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | | As Previously Reported | | Correction | | As Corrected | | As Previously Reported | | Correction | | As Corrected |
| Retained loss | | $ | (1,247.6 | ) | | $ | (5.0 | ) | | $ | (1,252.6 | ) | | $ | (1,226.8 | ) | | $ | (4.6 | ) | | $ | (1,231.4 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (53.9 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | | (56.1 | ) | | (48.7 | ) | | (2.1 | ) | | (50.8 | ) |
| Total stockholders’ deficit | | $ | (208.4 | ) | | $ | (7.2 | ) | | $ | (215.6 | ) | | $ | (222.8 | ) | | $ | (6.7 | ) | | $ | (229.5 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Compensation and benefits | | $ | 295.1 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 295.7 |
| | $ | 309.1 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 310.4 |
|
| Total operating expenses | | 1,542.0 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 1,542.6 |
| | 1,522.9 |
| | 1.3 |
| | 1,524.2 |
|
| Operating income | | 88.4 |
| | (0.6 | ) | | 87.8 |
| | 16.2 |
| | (1.3 | ) | | 14.9 |
|
| Income tax expense | | 26.8 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 26.6 |
| | 47.8 |
| | (0.5 | ) | | 47.3 |
|
| Net income (loss) | | $ | 16.3 |
| | $ | (0.4 | ) | | $ | 15.9 |
| | $ | (76.9 | ) | | $ | (0.8 | ) | | $ | (77.7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | (1.24 | ) | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (1.25 | ) |
| Diluted | | $ | 0.25 |
| | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | 0.24 |
| | $ | (1.24 | ) | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | (1.25 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net change in pension liability due to amortization of prior service credit and net actuarial loss, net of tax | | $ | 3.4 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | 3.5 |
| | $ | 5.0 |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 5.2 |
|
| Valuation adjustment for pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax | | (1.9 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | (2.1 | ) | | 12.7 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 12.5 |
|
| Pension settlement charge, net of tax | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8.9 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 9.3 |
|
| Other comprehensive (loss) income | | $ | (5.2 | ) | | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | (5.3 | ) | | $ | 18.4 |
| | $ | 0.4 |
| | $ | 18.8 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-cash compensation and pension expense | | $ | 24.5 |
| | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 25.1 |
| | $ | 45.3 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 46.6 |
|
| Provision for deferred income taxes | | $ | 7.5 |
| | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 7.3 |
| | $ | 25.6 |
| | $ | (0.5 | ) | | $ | 25.1 |
|
2016 Immaterial Error Correction
Prior to the issuance of the Company’s 2016 financial statements, the Company's management determined that there was an immaterial error in the historical presentation of the foreign exchange revenue on a net basis. As a result, in 2016, fee and other revenue and Fee and other commissions expense for the years ended 2015 and 2014 were restated from the amounts previously reported to correct the presentation of foreign exchange revenue from a net presentation to a gross presentation in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The correction was an increase in previously reported Fee and other revenue and Fee and other commissions expense. This correction had no impact on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows or Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit. For
the effects of the correction on the Company’s financial statements, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
F-45
Note 16 — Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following tables are the summation of quarterly (loss) earnings per common share and may not equate to the calculation for the full year as quarterly calculations are performed on a discrete basis. The quarterly financial information for 2016 has been immaterially restated, where applicable. See Note 15 — Immaterial Error Correction for more information on the restatement.
20152017 Fiscal Quarters:
| | | (Amounts in millions, except per share data) | First | | Second (1) | | Third | | Fourth | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth(1) |
| Total revenue | $ | 330.6 |
| | $ | 358.8 |
| | $ | 368.6 |
| | $ | 376.7 |
| $ | 386.1 |
| | $ | 410.0 |
| | $ | 397.8 |
| | $ | 408.2 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 328.9 |
| | 374.5 |
| | 352.0 |
| | 363.1 |
| 364.0 |
| | 390.2 |
| | 374.5 |
| | 464.7 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | 1.7 |
| | (15.7 | ) | | 16.6 |
| | 13.6 |
| |
| Operating income | | 22.1 |
| | 19.8 |
| | 23.3 |
| | (56.5 | ) |
| Total other expenses, net | 11.1 |
| | 11.4 |
| | 11.2 |
| | 11.6 |
| 10.8 |
| | 11.2 |
| | 11.6 |
| | 11.7 |
|
| (Loss) income before income taxes | $ | (9.4 | ) | | $ | (27.1 | ) | | $ | 5.4 |
| | $ | 2.0 |
| |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (72.0 | ) | | $ | (12.4 | ) | | $ | 4.9 |
| | $ | 2.6 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | |
| (Loss) earnings per common share | | | | | | | | |
| Income (loss) before income taxes | | $ | 11.3 |
| | $ | 8.6 |
| | $ | 11.7 |
| | $ | (68.2 | ) |
| Net income (loss) | | $ | 8.8 |
| | $ | 6.2 |
| | $ | 7.7 |
| | $ | (52.5 | ) |
| Earnings (loss) per common share | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | (1.16 | ) | | $ | (0.20 | ) | | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | 0.04 |
| $ | 0.14 |
| | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | 0.12 |
| | $ | (0.83 | ) |
| Diluted | $ | (1.16 | ) | | $ | (0.20 | ) | | $ | 0.08 |
| | $ | 0.04 |
| $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | 0.09 |
| | $ | 0.12 |
| | $ | (0.83 | ) |
| (1) In the fourth quarter of 2017, total operating expenses was impacted by an $85.0 million accrual related to the DPA. | | (1) In the fourth quarter of 2017, total operating expenses was impacted by an $85.0 million accrual related to the DPA. |
| |
(1) | For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company experienced a decline in total operating results, primarily as a result of increase in Transaction and operations support and a $13.8 million pension settlement charge related to the voluntary pension buyout recorded in Compensation and benefits. See Note 10 — Pension and Other Benefit for more information regarding the voluntary pension buyout.
|
20142016 Fiscal Quarters:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions, except per share data) | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth |
| Total revenue | $ | 374.9 |
| | $ | 372.4 |
| | $ | 358.0 |
| | $ | 349.6 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 337.9 |
| | 351.3 |
| | 341.7 |
| | 352.6 |
|
| Operating income | 37.0 |
| | 21.1 |
| | 16.3 |
| | (3.0 | ) |
| Total other expenses, net | 9.7 |
| | (11.0 | ) | | 11.6 |
| | (11.5 | ) |
| Income before income taxes | $ | 27.3 |
| | $ | 32.1 |
| | $ | 4.7 |
| | $ | 8.5 |
|
| Net income (loss) | $ | 39.0 |
| | $ | 25.6 |
| | $ | (3.0 | ) | | $ | 10.5 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Earnings (loss) per common share | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.54 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | 0.17 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 0.54 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | 0.17 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions, except per share data) | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth |
| | As Previously Reported | | Correction | | As Corrected | | As Previously Reported | | Correction | | As Corrected | | As Previously Reported | | Correction | | As Corrected | | As Previously Reported | | Correction | | As Corrected |
| Total revenue | $ | 387.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 387.1 |
| | $ | 414.3 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 414.3 |
| | $ | 412.8 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 412.8 |
| | $ | 416.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 416.2 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 364.0 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 364.1 |
| | 398.1 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 398.3 |
| | 386.6 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 386.7 |
| | 393.3 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 393.5 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | 23.1 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 23.0 |
| | 16.2 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 16.0 |
| | 26.2 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 26.1 |
| | 22.9 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 22.7 |
|
| Total other expenses, net | 11.3 |
| | — |
| | 11.3 |
| | 11.2 |
| | — |
| | 11.2 |
| | 11.3 |
| | — |
| | 11.3 |
| | 11.5 |
| | — |
| | 11.5 |
|
| (Loss) income before income taxes | $ | 11.8 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 11.7 |
| | $ | 5.0 |
| | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 4.8 |
| | $ | 14.9 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 14.8 |
| | $ | 11.4 |
| | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 11.2 |
|
| Net (loss) income | $ | (4.2 | ) | | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | (4.3 | ) | | $ | 3.1 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 3.0 |
| | $ | 10.2 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 10.1 |
| | $ | 7.2 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 7.1 |
|
| (Loss) earnings per common share | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | (0.07 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (0.07 | ) | | $ | 0.05 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.05 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 0.12 |
| | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | 0.11 |
|
| Diluted | $ | (0.07 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (0.07 | ) | | $ | 0.05 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.05 |
| | $ | 0.15 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.15 |
| | $ | 0.11 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.11 |
|
Note 17 — Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of the Company's Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. As such, the Company had the following two subsequent events:
On January 29, 2016, the Company and Walmart entered into an Amended and Restated Master Trust Agreement, pursuant to which we will provide certain money transfer services, bill payment services and money order services for customers in Walmart stores located in the United States and Puerto Rico (the “New Agreement”). In addition, under the New Agreement, the Company will offer money transfer services to Walmart’s customers through Walmart’s retail website. The New Agreement has an initial term of three years, commencing on February 1, 2016, and will be subject to automatic successive renewals of one-year terms unless either party gives notice to the other party of its election to terminate the New Agreement at least 180 days prior to the expiration date of the applicable term. Pursuant to the New Agreement, Walmart will provide the Company’s money transfer services, bill payment services and money order services on a non-exclusive basis, and we will pay Walmart fees and commissions for such services purchased by Walmart’s customers. Also, in connection with the services to be provided pursuant to the New Agreement, the Company has agreed to certain expenditures for marketing, innovation, growth and development initiatives.
On February 11, 2016, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with 49 states and the District of Columbia to settle any civil or administrative claims such attorneys general may have asserted under their consumer protection laws through the date of the settlement agreement in connection with the investigation regarding consumer fraud, which investigation is more fully described above in Note 14 —Commitments and Contingencies.
Note 1817 — Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
In the event the Company offers debt securities pursuant to an effective registration statement on Form S-3, these debt securities may be guaranteed by certain of its subsidiaries. Accordingly, the Company is providing condensed consolidating financial information in accordance with SECSecurities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Rule 3-10, Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered. If the Company issues debt securities, the following 100 percent directly or indirectly owned subsidiaries could fully and unconditionally guarantee the debt securities on a joint and several basis: MoneyGram Payment Systems Worldwide, Inc.; MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc.; and MoneyGram of New York LLC (collectively, the “Guarantors”).
The following information represents condensed, consolidatingCondensed Consolidating Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, along with condensed, consolidatingCondensed Consolidating Statements of Operations and Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013.2015. The condensed consolidating financial information presents financial information in separate columns for MoneyGram International, Inc. on a Parent-only basis carrying its investment in subsidiaries under the equity method; Guarantors on a combined basis, carrying investments in subsidiaries that are not expected to guarantee the debt (collectively, the “Non-Guarantors”) under the equity method; Non-Guarantors on a combined basis; and eliminating entries. The eliminating entries primarily reflect intercompany transactions, such as accounts receivable and payable, fee revenue and commissions expense and the elimination of equity investments and income in subsidiaries.
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETSSHEET
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| ASSETS | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1.7 |
| | $ | 9.6 |
| | $ | 178.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 190.0 |
|
| Settlement assets | — |
| | 3,491.4 |
| | 265.5 |
| | — |
| | 3,756.9 |
|
| Property and equipment, net | — |
| | 199.1 |
| | 15.8 |
| | — |
| | 214.9 |
|
| Goodwill | — |
| | 315.4 |
| | 126.8 |
| | — |
| | 442.2 |
|
| Other assets | 49.5 |
| | 110.3 |
| | 200.9 |
| | (192.2 | ) | | 168.5 |
|
| Equity investments in subsidiaries | 813.8 |
| | 132.4 |
| | — |
| | (946.2 | ) | | — |
|
| Intercompany receivables | — |
| | 546.9 |
| | — |
| | (546.9 | ) | | — |
|
| Total assets | $ | 865.0 |
| | $ | 4,805.1 |
| | $ | 787.7 |
| | $ | (1,685.3 | ) | | $ | 4,772.5 |
|
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY | | | | | | | | | |
| Payment service obligations | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,491.4 |
| | $ | 265.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,756.9 |
|
| Debt, net | 908.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 908.1 |
|
| Pension and other postretirement benefits | — |
| | 97.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 97.3 |
|
| Accounts payable and other liabilities | — |
| | 402.6 |
| | 50.9 |
| | (198.0 | ) | | 255.5 |
|
| Intercompany liabilities | 208.0 |
| | — |
| | 338.9 |
| | (546.9 | ) | | — |
|
| Total liabilities | 1,116.1 |
| | 3,991.3 |
| | 655.3 |
| | (744.9 | ) | | 5,017.8 |
|
| Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity | (251.1 | ) | | 813.8 |
| | 132.4 |
| | (940.4 | ) | | (245.3 | ) |
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ (deficit) equity | $ | 865.0 |
| | $ | 4,805.1 |
| | $ | 787.7 |
| | $ | (1,685.3 | ) | | $ | 4,772.5 |
|
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| REVENUE | | | | | | | | | |
| Fee and other revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,293.3 |
| | $ | 700.6 |
| | $ | (433.0 | ) | | $ | 1,560.9 |
|
| Investment revenue | — |
| | 40.2 |
| | 1.0 |
| | — |
| | 41.2 |
|
| Total revenue | — |
| | 1,333.5 |
| | 701.6 |
| | (433.0 | ) | | 1,602.1 |
|
| EXPENSES |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Fee and other commissions expense | — |
| | 556.6 |
| | 454.6 |
| | (247.7 | ) | | 763.5 |
|
| Investment commissions expense | — |
| | 8.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8.7 |
|
| Total commissions expense | — |
| | 565.3 |
| | 454.6 |
| | (247.7 | ) | | 772.2 |
|
| Compensation and benefits | — |
| | 178.4 |
| | 99.3 |
| | — |
| | 277.7 |
|
| Transaction and operations support | 1.7 |
| | 494.8 |
| | 88.2 |
| | (182.4 | ) | | 402.3 |
|
| Occupancy, equipment and supplies | — |
| | 50.0 |
| | 16.1 |
| | — |
| | 66.1 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | 66.6 |
| | 28.6 |
| | (20.1 | ) | | 75.1 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 1.7 |
| | 1,355.1 |
| | 686.8 |
| | (450.2 | ) | | 1,593.4 |
|
| OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME | (1.7 | ) | | (21.6 | ) | | 14.8 |
| | 17.2 |
| | 8.7 |
|
| Other expenses | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | 45.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 45.3 |
|
| Other | — |
| | (11.4 | ) | | — |
| | 11.4 |
| | — |
|
| Total other expenses | 45.3 |
| | (11.4 | ) | | — |
| | 11.4 |
| | 45.3 |
|
| (Loss) income before income taxes | (47.0 | ) | | (10.2 | ) | | 14.8 |
| | 5.8 |
| | (36.6 | ) |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (16.3 | ) | | 5.5 |
| | 4.0 |
| | — |
| | (6.8 | ) |
| (Loss) income after income taxes | (30.7 | ) | | (15.7 | ) | | 10.8 |
| | 5.8 |
| | (29.8 | ) |
| Equity income in subsidiaries | (4.9 | ) | | 10.8 |
| | — |
| | (5.9 | ) | | — |
|
| NET INCOME | (35.6 | ) | | (4.9 | ) | | 10.8 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | (29.8 | ) |
| TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME | (6.7 | ) | | (6.9 | ) | | 24.7 |
| | (18.0 | ) | | (6.9 | ) |
| COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME | $ | (42.3 | ) | | $ | (11.8 | ) | | $ | 35.5 |
| | $ | (18.1 | ) | | $ | (36.7 | ) |
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | $ | (43.8 | ) | | $ | 449.3 |
| | $ | (273.0 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 132.5 |
|
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | — |
| | (76.7 | ) | | (6.9 | ) | | — |
| | (83.6 | ) |
| Intercompany investments | — |
| | (40.0 | ) | | 356.7 |
| | (316.7 | ) | | — |
|
| Dividend from subsidiary guarantors | 52.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (52.0 | ) | | — |
|
| Capital contributions to non-guarantors | — |
| | (33.5 | ) | | — |
| | 33.5 |
| | — |
|
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 52.0 |
| | (150.2 | ) | | 349.8 |
| | (335.2 | ) | | (83.6 | ) |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal payments on debt | (9.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (9.8 | ) |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options and other | 1.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1.7 |
|
| Dividend to parent | — |
| | (52.0 | ) | | — |
| | 52.0 |
| | — |
|
| Intercompany financings | 1.6 |
| | (358.3 | ) | | 40.0 |
| | 316.7 |
| | — |
|
| Payments to tax authorities for stock-based compensation | — |
| | (8.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (8.0 | ) |
| Capital contributions from subsidiary guarantors | — |
| | — |
| | 33.5 |
| | (33.5 | ) | | — |
|
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (6.5 | ) | | (418.3 | ) | | 73.5 |
| | 335.2 |
| | (16.1 | ) |
| NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 1.7 |
| | (119.2 | ) | | 150.3 |
| | — |
| | 32.8 |
|
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of year | — |
| | 128.8 |
| | 28.4 |
| | — |
| | 157.2 |
|
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of year | $ | 1.7 |
| | $ | 9.6 |
| | $ | 178.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 190.0 |
|
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20152016
| | | (Amounts in millions) | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| ASSETS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2.1 |
| | $ | 88.2 |
| | $ | 74.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 164.5 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 128.8 |
| | $ | 28.4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 157.2 |
|
| Settlement assets | — |
| | 3,424.1 |
| | 81.5 |
| | — |
| | 3,505.6 |
| — |
| | 3,504.7 |
| | 129.6 |
| | — |
| | 3,634.3 |
|
| Property and equipment, net | — |
| | 179.0 |
| | 20.7 |
| | — |
| | 199.7 |
| — |
| | 184.3 |
| | 16.7 |
| | — |
| | 201.0 |
|
| Goodwill | — |
| | 315.3 |
| | 126.9 |
| | — |
| | 442.2 |
| — |
| | 315.3 |
| | 126.9 |
| | — |
| | 442.2 |
|
| Other assets | 27.0 |
| | 168.5 |
| | 36.4 |
| | (38.7 | ) | | 193.2 |
| 36.0 |
| | 146.0 |
| | 39.4 |
| | (58.7 | ) | | 162.7 |
|
| Equity investments in subsidiaries | 885.5 |
| | 215.8 |
| | — |
| | (1,101.3 | ) | | — |
| 879.1 |
| | 232.3 |
| | — |
| | (1,111.4 | ) | | — |
|
| Intercompany receivables | 6.3 |
| | 201.2 |
| | — |
| | (207.5 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | 155.1 |
| | 51.3 |
| | (206.4 | ) | | — |
|
| Total assets | $ | 920.9 |
| | $ | 4,592.1 |
| | $ | 339.7 |
| | $ | (1,347.5 | ) | | $ | 4,505.2 |
| $ | 915.1 |
| | $ | 4,666.5 |
| | $ | 392.3 |
| | $ | (1,376.5 | ) | | $ | 4,597.4 |
|
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Payment service obligations | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,462.3 |
| | $ | 43.3 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,505.6 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 3,525.4 |
| | $ | 108.9 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,634.3 |
|
| Debt | 942.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 942.6 |
| |
| Debt, net | | 915.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 915.2 |
|
| Pension and other postretirement benefits | — |
| | 96.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 96.3 |
| — |
| | 99.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 99.0 |
|
| Accounts payable and other liabilities | 1.0 |
| | 148.0 |
| | 73.2 |
| | (38.7 | ) | | 183.5 |
| 1.9 |
| | 170.2 |
| | 51.1 |
| | (58.7 | ) | | 164.5 |
|
| Intercompany liabilities | 200.1 |
| | — |
| | 7.4 |
| | (207.5 | ) | | — |
| 206.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (206.4 | ) | | — |
|
| Total liabilities | 1,143.7 |
| | 3,706.6 |
| | 123.9 |
| | (246.2 | ) | | 4,728.0 |
| 1,123.5 |
| | 3,794.6 |
| | 160.0 |
| | (265.1 | ) | | 4,813.0 |
|
| Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity | (222.8 | ) | | 885.5 |
| | 215.8 |
| | (1,101.3 | ) | | (222.8 | ) | (208.4 | ) | | 871.9 |
| | 232.3 |
| | (1,111.4 | ) | | (215.6 | ) |
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ (deficit) equity | $ | 920.9 |
| | $ | 4,592.1 |
| | $ | 339.7 |
| | $ | (1,347.5 | ) | | $ | 4,505.2 |
| $ | 915.1 |
| | $ | 4,666.5 |
| | $ | 392.3 |
| | $ | (1,376.5 | ) | | $ | 4,597.4 |
|
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTSSTATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20152016
| | | (Amounts in millions) | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| REVENUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fee and other revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,393.3 |
| | $ | 413.8 |
| | $ | (384.5 | ) | | $ | 1,422.6 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 1,569.7 |
| | $ | 417.9 |
| | $ | (375.2 | ) | | $ | 1,612.4 |
|
| Investment revenue | — |
| | 12.0 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 12.1 |
| — |
| | 18.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18.0 |
|
| Total revenue | — |
| | 1,405.3 |
| | 413.9 |
| | (384.5 | ) | | 1,434.7 |
| — |
| | 1,587.7 |
| | 417.9 |
| | (375.2 | ) | | 1,630.4 |
|
| EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| Fee and other commissions expense | — |
| | 638.4 |
| | 219.9 |
| | (202.9 | ) | | 655.4 |
| — |
| | 770.7 |
| | 219.7 |
| | (197.3 | ) | | 793.1 |
|
| Investment commissions expense | — |
| | 0.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.8 |
| — |
| | 2.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2.5 |
|
| Total commissions expense | — |
| | 639.2 |
| | 219.9 |
| | (202.9 | ) | | 656.2 |
| — |
| | 773.2 |
| | 219.7 |
| | (197.3 | ) | | 795.6 |
|
| Compensation and benefits | — |
| | 211.7 |
| | 97.4 |
| | — |
| | 309.1 |
| — |
| | 196.6 |
| | 99.1 |
| | — |
| | 295.7 |
|
| Transaction and operations support | 1.4 |
| | 451.3 |
| | 53.8 |
| | (181.7 | ) | | 324.8 |
| 2.0 |
| | 427.3 |
| | 58.1 |
| | (177.9 | ) | | 309.5 |
|
| Occupancy, equipment and supplies | — |
| | 54.7 |
| | 18.1 |
| | (10.5 | ) | | 62.3 |
| — |
| | 45.7 |
| | 16.2 |
| | — |
| | 61.9 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | 53.5 |
| | 12.6 |
| | — |
| | 66.1 |
| — |
| | 67.4 |
| | 12.5 |
| | — |
| | 79.9 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 1.4 |
| | 1,410.4 |
| | 401.8 |
| | (395.1 | ) | | 1,418.5 |
| 2.0 |
| | 1,510.2 |
| | 405.6 |
| | (375.2 | ) | | 1,542.6 |
|
| OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME | (1.4 | ) | | (5.1 | ) | | 12.1 |
| | 10.6 |
| | 16.2 |
| (2.0 | ) | | 77.5 |
| | 12.3 |
| | — |
| | 87.8 |
|
| Other expenses (income) | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other expenses | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | 45.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 45.3 |
| 45.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 45.0 |
|
| Other income | — |
| | — |
| | (10.6 | ) | | 10.6 |
| | — |
| |
| Total other expenses (income) | 45.3 |
| | — |
| | (10.6 | ) | | 10.6 |
| | 45.3 |
| |
| Debt extinguishment costs | | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Total other expenses | | 45.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 45.3 |
|
| (Loss) income before income taxes | (46.7 | ) | | (5.1 | ) | | 22.7 |
| | — |
| | (29.1 | ) | (47.3 | ) | | 77.5 |
| | 12.3 |
| | — |
| | 42.5 |
|
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (16.4 | ) | | 56.3 |
| | 7.9 |
| | — |
| | 47.8 |
| (16.5 | ) | | 46.2 |
| | (3.1 | ) | | — |
| | 26.6 |
|
| (Loss) income after income taxes | (30.3 | ) | | (61.4 | ) | | 14.8 |
| | — |
| | (76.9 | ) | (30.8 | ) | | 31.3 |
| | 15.4 |
| | — |
| | 15.9 |
|
| Equity (loss) income in subsidiaries | (46.6 | ) | | 14.8 |
| | — |
| | 31.8 |
| | — |
| |
| NET (LOSS) INCOME | (76.9 | ) | | (46.6 | ) | | 14.8 |
| | 31.8 |
| | (76.9 | ) | |
| TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | 18.4 |
| | 11.8 |
| | (20.4 | ) | | 8.6 |
| | 18.4 |
| |
| COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME | $ | (58.5 | ) | | $ | (34.8 | ) | | $ | (5.6 | ) | | $ | 40.4 |
| | $ | (58.5 | ) | |
| Equity income in subsidiaries | | 47.1 |
| | 15.4 |
| | — |
| | (62.5 | ) | | — |
|
| NET INCOME | | 16.3 |
| | 46.7 |
| | 15.4 |
| | (62.5 | ) | | 15.9 |
|
| TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS | | (5.3 | ) | | (5.3 | ) | | (34.3 | ) | | 39.6 |
| | (5.3 | ) |
| COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | | $ | 11.0 |
| | $ | 41.4 |
| | $ | (18.9 | ) | | $ | (22.9 | ) | | $ | 10.6 |
|
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTSSTATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20152016
| | | (Amounts in millions) | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | $ | (65.7 | ) | | $ | 149.6 |
| | $ | (50.3 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 33.6 |
| $ | (43.4 | ) | | $ | 142.7 |
| | $ | 21.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 120.9 |
|
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | — |
| | (96.5 | ) | | (13.4 | ) | | — |
| | (109.9 | ) | — |
| | (74.0 | ) | | (8.8 | ) | | — |
| | (82.8 | ) |
| Proceeds from disposal of assets | — |
| | 0.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.4 |
| |
| Intercompany investments | 28.3 |
| | 21.0 |
| | — |
| | (49.3 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | (12.6 | ) | | (58.7 | ) | | 71.3 |
| | — |
|
| Dividend from subsidiary guarantors | 47.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (47.6 | ) | | — |
| 70.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (70.7 | ) | | — |
|
| Capital contributions to non-guarantors | — |
| | (2.4 | ) | | — |
| | 2.4 |
| | — |
| — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
|
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 75.9 |
| | (77.5 | ) | | (13.4 | ) | | (94.5 | ) | | (109.5 | ) | 70.7 |
| | (86.7 | ) | | (67.5 | ) | | 0.7 |
| | (82.8 | ) |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Principal payments on debt | (9.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (9.8 | ) | (30.3 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (30.3 | ) |
| Stock repurchase | (0.4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (0.4 | ) | |
| Stock repurchases | | (11.7 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11.7 | ) |
| Dividend to parent | | — |
| | (70.7 | ) | | — |
| | 70.7 |
| | — |
|
| Intercompany financings | — |
| | (28.3 | ) | | (21.0 | ) | | 49.3 |
| | — |
| 12.6 |
| | 58.7 |
| | — |
| | (71.3 | ) | | — |
|
| Dividend to parent | — |
| | (47.6 | ) | | — |
| | 47.6 |
| | — |
| |
| Contingent consideration payment | | — |
| | (0.7 | ) | | — |
| — |
| — |
| | (0.7 | ) |
| Payments to tax authorities for stock-based compensation | | — |
| | (2.7 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2.7 | ) |
| Capital contributions from subsidiary guarantors | — |
| | — |
| | 2.4 |
| | (2.4 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | 0.1 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | — |
|
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (10.2 | ) | | (75.9 | ) | | (18.6 | ) | | 94.5 |
| | (10.2 | ) | (29.4 | ) | | (15.4 | ) | | 0.1 |
| | (0.7 | ) | | (45.4 | ) |
| NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | — |
| | (3.8 | ) | | (82.3 | ) | | — |
| | (86.1 | ) | (2.1 | ) | | 40.6 |
| | (45.8 | ) | | — |
| | (7.3 | ) |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period | 2.1 |
| | 92.0 |
| | 156.5 |
| | — |
| | 250.6 |
| |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period | $ | 2.1 |
| | $ | 88.2 |
| | $ | 74.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 164.5 |
| |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of year | | 2.1 |
| | 88.2 |
| | 74.2 |
| | — |
| | 164.5 |
|
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of year | | $ | — |
| | $ | 128.8 |
| | $ | 28.4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 157.2 |
|
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETSSTATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20142015
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| ASSETS | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2.1 |
| | $ | 92.0 |
| | $ | 156.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 250.6 |
|
| Settlement assets | — |
| | 3,494.4 |
| | 39.2 |
| | — |
| | 3,533.6 |
|
| Property and equipment, net | — |
| | 143.3 |
| | 22.3 |
| | — |
| | 165.6 |
|
| Goodwill | — |
| | 315.3 |
| | 127.2 |
| | — |
| | 442.5 |
|
| Other assets | 8.5 |
| | 253.3 |
| | 36.4 |
| | (62.2 | ) | | 236.0 |
|
| Equity investments in subsidiaries | 102.2 |
| | 206.2 |
| | — |
| | (308.4 | ) | | — |
|
| Intercompany receivables | 692.4 |
| | 51.5 |
| | — |
| | (743.9 | ) | | — |
|
| Total assets | $ | 805.2 |
| | $ | 4,556.0 |
| | $ | 381.6 |
| | $ | (1,114.5 | ) | | $ | 4,628.3 |
|
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY | | | | | | | | | |
| Payment service obligations | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,500.4 |
| | $ | 33.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,533.6 |
|
| Debt | 949.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 949.6 |
|
| Pension and other postretirement benefits | — |
| | 125.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 125.7 |
|
| Accounts payable and other liabilities | 38.3 |
| | 128.0 |
| | 98.0 |
| | (62.2 | ) | | 202.1 |
|
| Intercompany liabilities | — |
| | 699.7 |
| | 44.2 |
| | (743.9 | ) | | — |
|
| Total liabilities | 987.9 |
| | 4,453.8 |
| | 175.4 |
| | (806.1 | ) | | 4,811.0 |
|
| Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity | (182.7 | ) | | 102.2 |
| | 206.2 |
| | (308.4 | ) | | (182.7 | ) |
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ (deficit) equity | $ | 805.2 |
| | $ | 4,556.0 |
| | $ | 381.6 |
| | $ | (1,114.5 | ) | | $ | 4,628.3 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| REVENUE | | | | | | | | | |
| Fee and other revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,492.1 |
| | $ | 419.8 |
| | $ | (384.9 | ) | | $ | 1,527.0 |
|
| Investment revenue | — |
| | 12.0 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 12.1 |
|
| Total revenue | — |
| | 1,504.1 |
| | 419.9 |
| | (384.9 | ) | | 1,539.1 |
|
| EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | |
| Fee and other commissions expense | — |
| | 737.2 |
| | 225.9 |
| | (203.3 | ) | | 759.8 |
|
| Investment commissions expense | — |
| | 0.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.8 |
|
| Total commissions expense | — |
| | 738.0 |
| | 225.9 |
| | (203.3 | ) | | 760.6 |
|
| Compensation and benefits | — |
| | 213.0 |
| | 97.4 |
| | — |
| | 310.4 |
|
| Transaction and operations support | 1.4 |
| | 451.3 |
| | 53.8 |
| | (181.7 | ) | | 324.8 |
|
| Occupancy, equipment and supplies | — |
| | 54.7 |
| | 18.1 |
| | (10.5 | ) | | 62.3 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | 53.5 |
| | 12.6 |
| | — |
| | 66.1 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 1.4 |
| | 1,510.5 |
| | 407.8 |
| | (395.5 | ) | | 1,524.2 |
|
| OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME | (1.4 | ) | | (6.4 | ) | | 12.1 |
| | 10.6 |
| | 14.9 |
|
| Other expenses (income) | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | 45.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 45.3 |
|
| Other income | — |
| | — |
| | (10.6 | ) | | 10.6 |
| | — |
|
| Total other expenses (income), net | 45.3 |
| | — |
| | (10.6 | ) | | 10.6 |
| | 45.3 |
|
| (Loss) income before income taxes | (46.7 | ) | | (6.4 | ) | | 22.7 |
| | — |
| | (30.4 | ) |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (16.4 | ) | | 55.8 |
| | 7.9 |
| | — |
| | 47.3 |
|
| (Loss) income after income taxes | (30.3 | ) | | (62.2 | ) | | 14.8 |
| | — |
| | (77.7 | ) |
| Equity (loss) income in subsidiaries | (46.6 | ) | | 14.8 |
| | — |
| | 31.8 |
| | — |
|
| NET (LOSS) INCOME | (76.9 | ) | | (47.4 | ) | | 14.8 |
| | 31.8 |
| | (77.7 | ) |
| TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | 18.8 |
| | 12.2 |
| | (20.4 | ) | | 8.2 |
| | 18.8 |
|
| COMPREHENSIVE LOSS | $ | (58.1 | ) | | $ | (35.2 | ) | | $ | (5.6 | ) | | $ | 40.0 |
| | $ | (58.9 | ) |
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTSSTATEMENT OF OPERATIONSCASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20142015
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| REVENUE | | | | | | | | | |
| Fee and other revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,547.0 |
| | $ | 334.9 |
| | $ | (443.5 | ) | | $ | 1,438.4 |
|
| Investment revenue | — |
| | 16.3 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | 16.5 |
|
| Total revenue | — |
| | 1,563.3 |
| | 335.1 |
| | (443.5 | ) | | 1,454.9 |
|
| EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | |
| Fee and other commissions expense | — |
| | 802.5 |
| | 161.9 |
| | (298.4 | ) | | 666.0 |
|
| Investment commissions expense | — |
| | 0.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.4 |
|
| Total commissions expense | — |
| | 802.9 |
| | 161.9 |
| | (298.4 | ) | | 666.4 |
|
| Compensation and benefits | — |
| | 193.5 |
| | 81.5 |
| | — |
| | 275.0 |
|
| Transaction and operations support | 3.1 |
| | 414.8 |
| | 59.4 |
| | (145.1 | ) | | 332.2 |
|
| Occupancy, equipment and supplies | — |
| | 40.5 |
| | 13.9 |
| | — |
| | 54.4 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | 42.1 |
| | 13.4 |
| | — |
| | 55.5 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 3.1 |
| | 1,493.8 |
| | 330.1 |
| | (443.5 | ) | | 1,383.5 |
|
| OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME | (3.1 | ) | | 69.5 |
| | 5.0 |
| | — |
| | 71.4 |
|
| Other expenses (income) | | | | | | | | | |
| Securities settlements | — |
| | (45.4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (45.4 | ) |
| Interest expense | 44.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 44.2 |
|
Total other expenses (income), net
| 44.2 |
| | (45.4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1.2 | ) |
| (Loss) income before income taxes | (47.3 | ) | | 114.9 |
| | 5.0 |
| | — |
| | 72.6 |
|
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (16.6 | ) | | 15.4 |
| | 1.7 |
| | — |
| | 0.5 |
|
| (Loss) income after income taxes | (30.7 | ) | | 99.5 |
| | 3.3 |
| | — |
| | 72.1 |
|
| Equity income (loss) in subsidiaries | 102.8 |
| | 3.3 |
| | — |
| | (106.1 | ) | | — |
|
| NET INCOME (LOSS) | 72.1 |
| | 102.8 |
| | 3.3 |
| | (106.1 | ) | | 72.1 |
|
| TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME | (34.1 | ) | | (34.1 | ) | | (18.6 | ) | | 52.7 |
| | (34.1 | ) |
| COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | $ | 38.0 |
| | $ | 68.7 |
| | $ | (15.3 | ) | | $ | (53.4 | ) | | $ | 38.0 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | $ | (65.7 | ) | | $ | 150.1 |
| | $ | (50.3 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 34.1 |
|
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | — |
| | (96.5 | ) | | (13.4 | ) | | — |
| | (109.9 | ) |
| Proceeds from disposal of assets | — |
| | 0.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.4 |
|
| Intercompany investments | 28.3 |
| | 21.0 |
| | — |
| | (49.3 | ) | | — |
|
| Dividend from subsidiary guarantors | 47.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (47.6 | ) | | — |
|
| Capital contributions to non-guarantors | — |
| | (2.4 | ) | | — |
| | 2.4 |
| | — |
|
| Net cash provided by (used in) by investing activities | 75.9 |
| | (77.5 | ) | | (13.4 | ) | | (94.5 | ) | | (109.5 | ) |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | |
| Principle payments on debt | (9.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (9.8 | ) |
| Stock repurchases | (0.4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (0.4 | ) |
| Intercompany financings | — |
| | (28.3 | ) | | (21.0 | ) | | 49.3 |
| | — |
|
| Dividend to parent | — |
| | (47.6 | ) | | — |
| | 47.6 |
| | — |
|
| Payments to tax authorities for stock-based compensation | — |
| | (0.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (0.5 | ) |
| Capital contributions from subsidiary guarantors | — |
| | — |
| | 2.4 |
| | (2.4 | ) | | — |
|
| Net cash used in financing activities | (10.2 | ) | | (76.4 | ) | | (18.6 | ) | | 94.5 |
| | (10.7 | ) |
| NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | — |
| | (3.8 | ) | | (82.3 | ) | | — |
| | (86.1 | ) |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of year | 2.1 |
| | 92.0 |
| | 156.5 |
| | — |
| | 250.6 |
|
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of year | $ | 2.1 |
| | $ | 88.2 |
| | $ | 74.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 164.5 |
|
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | $ | (27.4 | ) | | $ | 48.3 |
| | $ | 41.4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 62.3 |
|
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | — |
| | (69.0 | ) | | (16.8 | ) | | — |
| | (85.8 | ) |
| Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired | — |
| | (3.7 | ) | | (7.8 | ) | | — |
| | (11.5 | ) |
| Proceeds from disposal of assets | — |
| | 0.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.9 |
|
| Intercompany investments | 11.2 |
| | (47.5 | ) | | — |
| | 36.3 |
| | — |
|
| Dividend from subsidiary guarantors | 50.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (50.7 | ) | | — |
|
| Net cash provided (used in) by investing activities | 61.9 |
| | (119.3 | ) | | (24.6 | ) | | (14.4 | ) | | (96.4 | ) |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of debt | 129.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 129.8 |
|
| Transaction costs for issuance and amendment of debt | (5.1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (5.1 | ) |
| Principle payments on debt | (9.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (9.5 | ) |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 0.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.4 |
|
| Stock repurchase | (149.7 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (149.7 | ) |
| Intercompany financings | — |
| | (11.2 | ) | | 47.5 |
| | (36.3 | ) | | — |
|
| Dividend to parent | — |
| | (50.7 | ) | | — |
| | 50.7 |
| | — |
|
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (34.1 | ) | | (61.9 | ) | | 47.5 |
| | 14.4 |
| | (34.1 | ) |
| NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 0.4 |
| | (132.9 | ) | | 64.3 |
| | — |
| | (68.2 | ) |
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period | 1.7 |
| | 224.9 |
| | 92.2 |
| | — |
| | 318.8 |
|
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period | $ | 2.1 |
| | $ | 92.0 |
| | $ | 156.5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 250.6 |
|
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| REVENUE | | | | | | | | | |
| Fee and other revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,488.4 |
| | $ | 327.7 |
| | $ | (359.3 | ) | | $ | 1,456.8 |
|
| Investment revenue | — |
| | 17.4 |
| | 0.3 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 17.6 |
|
| Total revenue | — |
| | 1,505.8 |
| | 328.0 |
| | (359.4 | ) | | 1,474.4 |
|
| EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | |
| Fee and other commissions expense | — |
| | 730.5 |
| | 167.0 |
| | (219.7 | ) | | 677.8 |
|
| Investment commissions expense | — |
| | 0.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.4 |
|
| Total commissions expense | — |
| | 730.9 |
| | 167.0 |
| | (219.7 | ) | | 678.2 |
|
| Compensation and benefits | — |
| | 196.0 |
| | 68.9 |
| | — |
| | 264.9 |
|
| Transaction and operations support | 1.7 |
| | 339.7 |
| | 51.9 |
| | (139.6 | ) | | 253.7 |
|
| Occupancy, equipment and supplies | — |
| | 40.5 |
| | 8.6 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 49.0 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | 36.4 |
| | 14.3 |
| | — |
| | 50.7 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 1.7 |
| | 1,343.5 |
| | 310.7 |
| | (359.4 | ) | | 1,296.5 |
|
| OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME | (1.7 | ) | | 162.3 |
| | 17.3 |
| | — |
| | 177.9 |
|
| Other expenses | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | 30.3 |
| | 17.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 47.3 |
|
| Debt extinguishment costs | — |
| | 45.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 45.3 |
|
| Total other expenses | 30.3 |
| | 62.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 92.6 |
|
| (Loss) income before income taxes | (32.0 | ) | | 100.0 |
| | 17.3 |
| | — |
| | 85.3 |
|
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (11.2 | ) | | 36.6 |
| | 7.5 |
| | — |
| | 32.9 |
|
| (Loss) income after income taxes | (20.8 | ) | | 63.4 |
| | 9.8 |
| | — |
| | 52.4 |
|
| Equity income (loss) in subsidiaries | 73.2 |
| | 9.8 |
| | — |
| | (83.0 | ) | | — |
|
| NET INCOME (LOSS) | 52.4 |
| | 73.2 |
| | 9.8 |
| | (83.0 | ) | | 52.4 |
|
| TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | 19.3 |
| | 19.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| | (19.6 | ) | | 19.3 |
|
| COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | $ | 71.7 |
| | $ | 92.5 |
| | $ | 10.1 |
| | $ | (102.6 | ) | | $ | 71.7 |
|
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Amounts in millions) | Parent | | Subsidiary Guarantors | | Non- Guarantors | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES | $ | (48.0 | ) | | $ | 198.5 |
| | $ | 5.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 156.1 |
|
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | — |
| | (48.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (48.8 | ) |
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
| — |
| | (15.0 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | | — |
| | (15.4 | ) |
| Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment | — |
| | 0.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.7 |
|
| Intercompany investments | (841.4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 841.4 |
| | — |
|
| Dividend from subsidiary guarantors | 44.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (44.0 | ) | | — |
|
| Capital contribution from non-guarantors | — |
| | 0.8 |
| | — |
| | (0.8 | ) | | — |
|
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (797.4 | ) | | (62.3 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | | 796.6 |
| | (63.5 | ) |
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of debt | 850.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 850.0 |
|
| Transaction costs for issuance and amendment of debt | — |
| | (11.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (11.8 | ) |
| Prepayment penalty | — |
| | (21.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (21.5 | ) |
| Payments on debt | (6.3 | ) | | (813.2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (819.5 | ) |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 1.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1.1 |
|
| Intercompany financings | — |
| | 841.4 |
| | — |
| | (841.4 | ) | | — |
|
| Dividend to parent | — |
| | (44.0 | ) | | — |
| | 44.0 |
| | — |
|
| Capital contribution to subsidiary guarantors | — |
| | — |
| | (0.8 | ) | | 0.8 |
| | — |
|
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 844.8 |
| | (49.1 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | (796.6 | ) | | (1.7 | ) |
| NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | (0.6 | ) | | 87.1 |
| | 4.4 |
| | — |
| | 90.9 |
|
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period | 2.3 |
| | 137.8 |
| | 87.8 |
| | — |
| | 227.9 |
|
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period | $ | 1.7 |
| | $ | 224.9 |
| | $ | 92.2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 318.8 |
|
