UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| |
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172020
or
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-33409
T-MOBILE US, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | | | | | | |
DELAWAREDelaware | | 20-0836269 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
12920 SE 38th Street, Bellevue, Washington | | 98006-1350 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
| | |
(425) 378-4000 |
| | |
| | |
|
12920 SE 38th Street
Bellevue,Washington
(Address of principal executive offices)
98006-1350
(Zip Code)
| | | | | |
| |
| (425) | 378-4000 |
| (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
| | |
| Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Title of Each Classeach class | | Trading Symbol | | Name of Each Exchangeeach exchange on Which Registeredwhich registered |
Common Stock, $0.00001 par value $0.00001 per share | | TMUS | | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
| | |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None. None |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x☒ No¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨No x☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x☒ No ¨☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x☒ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer | ☒ | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
| Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ |
| | Emerging growth company | ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨
Emerging growth company ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨☐ No x☒
As of June 30, 2017,2020, the aggregate market value of the registrant’svoting and non-voting common stockequity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $17.8$40.7 billion based on the closing sale price as reported on the NASDAQ. Global Select Market. As of February 2, 2018,17, 2021, there were 854,428,5931,242,804,085 shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporateswill be incorporated by reference from certain portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the registrant’sRegistrant’s 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which definitive Proxy Statement shallwill be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal yearpursuant to whichRegulation 14A or will be included in an amendment to this Report relates.Report.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Form 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 20172020
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, including information concerning our future results of operations, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “could” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions, which are subject to risks and uncertainties andthat may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. The following important factors, along with the Risk Factors included in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K, could affect future results and cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements:
•natural disasters, public health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic (the “Pandemic”), terrorist attacks or similar incidents;
•adverse economic, political or politicalmarket conditions in the U.S. and international markets;markets, including those caused by the Pandemic;
•competition, industry consolidation and changes in the market condition for wireless services;
•data loss or other security breaches;
•the scarcity and cost of additional wireless spectrum, and regulations relating to spectrum use;
•our inability to retain or motivate key personnel, hire qualified personnel or maintain our corporate culture;
•our inability to take advantage of technological developments on a timely basis;
•system failures and business disruptions, allowing for unauthorized use of or interference with our network and other systems;
•the impacts of the actions we have taken and conditions we have agreed to in connection with the regulatory proceedings and approvals of the Transactions (as defined below), including the Prepaid Transaction (as defined in Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements), the complaint and proposed final judgment (the “Consent Decree”) agreed to by us, Deutsche Telekom AG (“DT”), Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”), SoftBank Group Corp. (“SoftBank”) and DISH Network Corporation (“DISH”) with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which was approved by the Court on April 1, 2020, the proposed commitments filed with the Secretary of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”), which we announced on May 20, 2019, certain national security commitments and undertakings, and any other commitments or undertakings entered into including but not limited to those we have made to certain states and nongovernmental organizations (collectively, the “Government Commitments”), and the challenges in satisfying the Government Commitments in the required time frames and the significant cumulative cost incurred in tracking, monitoring and complying with them; •our inability to manage the ongoing commercial and transition services could negatively affect our ability to attractarrangements that we entered into with DISH in connection with the Prepaid Transaction, which we completed on July 1, 2020 (collectively, the “Divestiture Transaction”), and retain customers;known or unknown liabilities arising in connection therewith;
•the effects of any future merger,acquisition, investment, or acquisitionmerger involving us, as well as the effects of mergers, investments, or acquisitions in the technology, media and telecommunications industry;us;
challenges in implementing our business strategies or funding our operations, including payment for additional spectrum or network upgrades;
the possibility that we may be unable to renew our spectrum licenses on attractive terms or acquire new spectrum licenses at reasonable costs and terms;
difficulties in managing growth in wireless data services, including network quality;
material changes in available technology and the effects of such changes, including product substitutions and deployment costs and performance;
the timing, scope and financial impact of our deployment of advanced network and business technologies;
the impact on our networks and business from major technology equipment failures;
breaches of our and/or our third-party vendors’ networks, information technology and data security;
natural disasters, terrorist attacks or similar incidents;
unfavorable outcomes of existing or future litigation;
any changes in the regulatory environments in which we operate, including any increase in restrictions on the ability to operate our networks;
•any disruption or failure of our third parties’ orparties (including key suppliers’ provisioning ofsuppliers) to provide products or services;services for the operation of our business;
material adverse changes in labor matters, including labor campaigns, negotiations•the occurrence of high fraud rates or additional organizing activity,volumes related to device financing, customer payment cards, third-party dealers, employees, subscriptions, identities or account takeover fraud;
•our substantial level of indebtedness and any resulting financial, operational and/or reputational impact;
the abilityour inability to make payments onservice our debt or to repay our existing indebtedness when dueobligations in accordance with their terms or to comply with the restrictive covenants contained therein;
•adverse changechanges in the ratings of our debt securities or adverse conditions in the credit markets;
•the risk of future material weaknesses we may identify while we work to integrate and align policies, principles and practices of the two companies following the Merger (as defined below), or any other failure by us to maintain effective internal controls, and the resulting significant costs and reputational damage;
•any changes in accounting assumptions thatregulations or in the regulatory agencies, includingframework under which we operate;
•laws and regulations relating to the Securitieshandling of privacy and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), may require, which could result in an impact on earnings;data protection;
changes in•unfavorable outcomes of existing or future legal proceedings;
•our offering of regulated financial services products and exposure to a wide variety of state and federal regulations;
•new or amended tax laws or regulations or administrative interpretations and existing standards andjudicial decisions affecting the resolutionscope or application of disputes with any taxing jurisdictions; andtax laws or regulations;
•the possibility that we may be unable to renew our spectrum leases on attractive terms or the reset process underpossible revocation of our trademark licenseexisting licenses in the event that we violate applicable laws;
•interests of our significant stockholders that may differ from the interests of other stockholders;
•future sales of our common stock by DT and SoftBank and our inability to attract additional equity financing outside the United States due to foreign ownership limitations by the FCC;
•the volatility of our stock price and our lack of plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future;
•failure to realize the expected benefits and synergies of the merger (the “Merger”) with Deutsche Telekom resultsSprint, pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement with Sprint and the other parties named therein (as amended, the “Business Combination Agreement”) and the other transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement (collectively, the “Transactions”) in the expected timeframes or in the amounts anticipated;
•any delay and costs of, or difficulties in, integrating our business and Sprint’s business and operations, and unexpected additional operating costs, customer loss and business disruption, including maintaining relationships with employees, customers, suppliers or vendors;
•unanticipated difficulties, disruption, or significant delays in our long-term strategy to migrate Sprint’s legacy customers onto T-Mobile’s existing billing platforms; and
•changes to existing or the royalty rates for our trademarks.issuance of new accounting standards by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other regulatory agencies.
Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements, except as required by law. In this Form 10-K, unless the context indicates otherwise, references to “T-Mobile,” “T-Mobile US,” “our Company,” “the Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to T-Mobile US, Inc., as a Delaware corporation,standalone company prior to April 1, 2020, the date we completed the Merger with Sprint, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.on and after April 1, 2020, refer to the combined company as a result of the Merger.
Investors and others should note that we announce material financial and operational information to our investors using our investor relations website, press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. We intend to also use thecertain social media accounts as means of disclosing information about us and our services and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD (the @TMobileIR Twitter account (https://twitter.com/TMobileIR) and the @JohnLegere@MikeSievert Twitter account (https://twitter.com/JohnLegere)MikeSievert), Facebook and Periscope accounts, which Mr. LegereSievert also uses as a means for personal communications and observations, as means of disclosing information about the Company and its services and for complying with its disclosure obligations under Regulation FD.observations). The information we post through these social media channels may be deemed material. Accordingly, investors
should monitor these social media channels in addition to following the Company’sour press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. The social media channels that we intend to use as a means of disclosing the information described above may be updated from time to time as listed on the Company’s investor relationsour Investor Relations website.
PART I.
Item 1. Business
Business Overview and Strategy
Un-carrier Strategy
We are the Un-carrier. Through our Un-carrier strategy, we’vewe have disrupted the wireless communications services industry, by actively engaging with and listening to our customers and eliminating their existing pain points, including providing them with added value, and an exceptional experience. We introduced ourexperience and implementing signature Un-carrier strategy in 2013 and have since announced 14 signature initiatives that have changed the wireless industry forever.for good. We ended annual service contracts, overages, unpredictable international roaming fees, data buckets and so much more. Customer response to our Un-carrier strategy has allowed T-Mobile to grow into the third largest wireless provider in the United States. We will continue ourare inspired by a relentless focus on customers and are determined to bring the Un-carrier to every potential customer in the United States.
Our relentless focus on customer experience through increased investmentfocus, consistently leading the wireless industry in customer care distribution expansion,by delivering an excellent customer experience with our “Team of Experts,” which drives our record-high customer satisfaction levels while enabling operational efficiencies.
The Un-carrier was supercharged upon the completion of our Merger with Sprint on April 1, 2020, which resulted in Sprint and digital initiatives has strengthenedits subsidiaries becoming wholly owned consolidated subsidiaries of T-Mobile. Through the Merger, we acquired Sprint’s customers and 2.5 GHz mid-band spectrum, among other assets. As the supercharged Un-carrier, we are on a mission to build America’s best 5G network, offering customers unrivalled coverage and capacity where they live, work and play. Our network is the foundation of our customer growthsuccess and powers everything we do. As one company, we have begun to combine our mid-band spectrum licenses, including Advanced Wireless Services (“AWS”), Personal Communications Services (“PCS”) and 2.5 GHz, our millimeter-wave licenses and our foundational layer of low-band spectrum, including 600 MHz, 700 MHz and 800 MHz, to create a “layer cake” of spectrum and provide an unmatched 5G experience to our customers. We believe this layer cake will broaden and deepen our nationwide 5G network enabling accelerated innovation and increased customer retentioncompetition in the U.S. wireless, video and satisfaction. broadband industries. We have achieved and expect to continue to achieve significant synergies and cost reductions by eliminating redundancies within the combined network as well as other business processes and operations.
Our 4G Long-Term Evolution (“LTE”) network covers 328 million people (99% of the U.S. population). Additionally, our 5G network is America’s largest, covering 1.6 million square miles, 280 million people and 9,100 cities and towns across the United States, including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, as of December 31, 2020.
We continue to investexpand the footprint and innovate in these areasimprove the quality of our network, providing outstanding wireless experiences for customers who will not have to deliver our customers the best value in the industry. Everything we do is powered by our nationwide 4G LTE network,compromise on quality and we are rapidly preparing for the next generation of 5G services.value. Going forward, it is this network that will allow us to deliver new, innovative new products and services with the same customer focusedexperience focus and industry disruptingindustry-disrupting mentality that has redefined the wireless servicecommunications services industry in the United States.States in the customers’ favor.
History
T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile USA”), a Delaware corporation, was formed in 1994 as VoiceStream Wireless PCS (“VoiceStream”), a subsidiary of Western Wireless Corporation (“Western Wireless”). VoiceStream was spun off from Western Wireless in 1999, acquired by Deutsche Telekom AG (“Deutsche Telekom”) in 2001 and renamed T-Mobile USA, Inc. in 2002.
In 2013, T-Mobile US, Inc. was formed through the business combination between T-Mobile USA and MetroPCS Communications, Inc. (“MetroPCS”). The business combination was accounted for as a reverse acquisition with T-Mobile USA as the accounting acquirer. Accordingly, T-Mobile USA’s historical financial statements became the historical financial statements of the combined company.
Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “TMUS.”
Business
WeAs of December 31, 2020, we provide wireless services to 72.6102.1 million customers in the postpaid and prepaid and wholesale marketscustomers and generate revenue by providing affordable wireless communicationcommunications services to these customers, as well as a wide selection of wireless devices and accessories. Our most significant expenses are relatedrelate to acquiringoperating and retaining high-quality customers,expanding our network, providing a full range of devices, acquiring and retaining high-quality customers and compensating employees, and operating and expanding our network.employees. We provide service, devices and accessories across our flagship brands, T-Mobile and MetroPCS,Metro by T-Mobile, through our owned and operated retail stores, third party distributors and our websites (www.T-Mobile.com and www.MetroPCS.com). The information on our websites is not part of this Form 10-K. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for addition information.
Customers
We provide wireless communication services to three primary categories of customers:
Branded postpaid customers generally include customers that are qualified to pay after receiving wireless communication services utilizing phones, mobile broadband devices (including tablets), or DIGITS;
Branded prepaid customers generally include customers who pay for wireless communication services in advance. Our branded prepaid customers include customers of T-Mobile and MetroPCS; and
Wholesale customers include Machine-to-Machine (“M2M”) and MVNO that operate on our network, but are managed by wholesale partners.
We generate the majority of our service revenues by providing wireless communication services to branded postpaid and branded prepaid customers. Our ability to acquire and retain branded postpaid and prepaid customers is important to our business in the generation of service revenues, equipment revenues and other revenues. In 2017, our service revenues generated by providing wireless communication services by customer category were:
65% Branded postpaid customers;
31% Branded prepaid customers; and
4% Wholesale customers and Roaming and other services.
Segment and Geographic Information
All of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 were earned in the United States, including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. All of our long-lived assets are located in the United States, including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Services and Products
We provide wireless communication services through a variety of service plan options. We also offer a wide selection of wireless devices, including smartphones, tablets and other mobile communication devices, which are manufactured by various suppliers. Services, devices and accessories are offered directly to consumers through the retail stores we operate, as well as through our websites
(www.t-mobile.com and www.metrobyt-mobile.com), T-Mobile app and customer care channels. In addition, we sell devices to dealers and other third-party distributors for resale through independent third-party retail outlets and a variety of third-party websites.
The information on our websites is not part of this Form 10-K. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information.
Services and Products
We provide wireless communications services through a variety of service plan options. We also offer a wide selection of wireless devices, including smartphones, wearables, tablets and other mobile communication devices, which are manufactured by various suppliers.
Our primary service plan offerings,offering, which allowallows customers to subscribe for wireless communications services separately from the purchase of a device, include:
Our T-Mobile ONEis our signature Magenta plan (“T-Mobile ONE”Magenta”), which gives our customersincludes, among other benefits, unlimited calls, unlimitedtalk, text and unlimited high-speed 4G LTEsmartphone data on their device, where monthly wireless service fees and sales taxes are included in the advertised monthly recurring charge. On T-Mobile ONE, video typically streams at DVD (480p) quality and tethering is at maximum 3G speeds. Customers on T-Mobile ONE can keep their price for service until they decide to change it and participating customers who use 2 GB or less of data in a month will get up to a $10 credit per qualifying line on their next month’s bill. Additionally, qualifying T-Mobile ONE customers on family plans can opt in for a standard monthly Netflix service planour network, 5G access at no additional cost.extra cost, scam protection features and more. Customers canalso have the ability to choose to add on additional features, such as HD video streaming and increased high-speed hotspot data, for an additional cost as follows:
On T-Mobile ONEon our Magenta Plus plan. We also offer an Essentials rate plan for customers also receive unlimited High Definition video streaming, 10 GB of high-speed 4G LTE tethering, Voicemail to Text, NameID, unlimited Gogo in-flight internet passes on capable domestic flights and up to two times faster speeds when traveling abroad in 140+ countries and destinations.
On T-Mobile ONE Plus International, customers receivewho want the benefits of T-Mobile ONE Plusbasics, as well as free and reduced calling from the U.S., Mexico, and Canada to foreign countries and unlimited high-speed 4G LTE tethering.
Simple Choice plans, which were launched in 2013 as part of phase 1.0 of our Un-carrier initiatives, eliminated annual service contracts and simplified the lineup of consumerspecific rate plans to one affordable plan for unlimited voicequalifying customers, including Unlimited 55+, Military, First Responder, and messaging services with the option to add data services. On January 25, 2017, we streamlined our Simple Choice plan offerings to new customers into our T-Mobile ONE plan.Business.
Depending on their credit profile, customers are qualified either for postpaid or prepaid service.
Our device options for qualifying customers on T-Mobile ONE, and previously on Simple Choice plans, include:
Depending on their credit profile, qualifying customers who purchase a device from us have the•The option of financing all or a portion of the individual device or accessory purchase price at the time of sale over an installment period, generally of up to 24 months, using ouran Equipment Installment Plan (“EIP”).;
| |
• | In addition,•For qualifying customers who finance their initial device with an EIP can enroll in our Just Upgrade My Phone (“JUMP!”®) program to later upgrade their device. Upon a qualifying JUMP! upgrade, the customer’s remaining EIP balance is settled provided they trade-in their used device at the time of upgrade in good working condition and purchase a new device from us on a new EIP. |
In 2015, we introduced JUMP! On Demand. With JUMP! On Demand, a low monthly payment covers the cost of leasing a new device and gives qualified customers the freedom to exchange it for a new device up to one time per month for no extra fee. Upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers must return their device in good working condition or purchase their device. Customers that choose to purchase their device have thewith an EIP, an option to financeenroll in our Just Upgrade My Phone (“JUMP!®”) program to later upgrade their device; and
•The option to lease a device over a nine-month EIP.period of up to 18 months and upgrade it when eligibility requirements are met.
NetworkWe also provide products that are complementary to our wireless communications services, including device protection, Home Internet, TVision™ and wireline communication services to domestic and international customers.
The speed and capacityIn August 2020, we unified the Sprint retail operations under the T-Mobile brand, providing Sprint customers access to all of our LTE network allows us to offer “America’s Best Unlimited Network” to our customers. Our advancements in network technologyproducts, services and our spectrum resources ensure we can continue to increase the breadth and depth of our network as the industry moves towards 5G.retail locations.
Spectrum GrowthCustomers
We provide wireless communications services to two primary categories of customers:
•Postpaid customers generally include customers who are qualified to pay after receiving wireless communications services utilizing phones, wearables, DIGITS (a service that allows our customers to use multiple mobile communicationnumbers on any compatible smartphone or device with internet connection) or other connected devices, which include tablets and SyncUp products; and
•Prepaid customers generally include customers who pay for wireless communications services in advance. Our prepaid customers include customers of T-Mobile and Metro by T-Mobile.
We provide Machine-to-Machine (“M2M”) and Mobile Virtual Network Operator (“MVNO”) customers access to our network. This access and the customer relationship is managed by wholesale partners.
We generate the majority of our service revenues by providing wireless communications services to postpaid and prepaid customers. Our ability to attract and retain postpaid and prepaid customers is important to our business in the generation of service revenues, equipment revenues and other revenues. In 2020, our service revenues generated by providing wireless communications services by customer category were:
•72% Postpaid customers;
•19% Prepaid customers; and
•9% Wholesale, roaming and other services.
Substantially all of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, were earned in the United States, including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Network Strategy
On April 1, 2020, we closed our Merger with Sprint, which greatly enhanced our spectrum position. Integration of the spectrum and network assets acquired in the Merger is expected to occur over the next three years.
The integration strategy includes deploying the acquired spectrum on the combined network assets to supplement capacity, migrating Sprint customers to our network and optimizing the combined assets by decommissioning redundant sites to realize synergies.
Spectrum Position
We provide wireless communications services utilizing mid-band spectrum licenses, such as Advanced Wireless Services (“AWS”)AWS, PCS and Personal Communications Service (“PCS”), and2.5 GHz, low-band spectrum licenses utilizing our 600 MHz, and 700 MHz and 800 MHz spectrum and mmWave spectrum.
•We ownedcontrolled an average of 110329 MHz of combined low- and mid-band spectrum nationwide as of December 31, 2017,2020. This spectrum is comprised of anof:
•An average of 3140 MHz in the 600 MHz band,band;
•An average of 10 MHz in the 700 MHz band, 29band;
•An average of 14 MHz in the 800 MHz band;
•An average of 66 MHz in the 1900 MHz PCS band and 40band;
•An average of 41 MHz in the AWS band. This is compared to anband; and
•An average of 79158 MHz in the 2.5 GHz band.
•In March 2020, the FCC announced the results of Auctions 103 (37/39 GHz and 47 GHz spectrum nationwidebands). We were the winning bidder of 2,384 licenses for an aggregate price of $873 million. Prior to the Merger, the FCC announced that Sprint was the winning bidder of 127 licenses in Auction 103.
•In April 2020, we acquired control of FCC licenses in the 800 MHz, 1900 MHz and 2.5 GHz bands as part of our Merger with Sprint.
•We plan to evaluate future spectrum purchases in current and upcoming auctions and in the secondary market to further augment our current spectrum position.
•As of December 31, 2020, we had equipment deployed on approximately 108,000 macro cell sites and 69,000 small cell/distributed antenna system sites across our T-Mobile and legacy Sprint networks.
5G Leadership
•As of December 31, 2020, our Extended Range 5G covers 280 million people in 9,100 cities and towns covering 1.6 million square miles.
•Our Ultra Capacity 5G covers 106 million people as of December 31, 2016.
| |
• | In April 2017, the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) announced the results of the broadcast incentive auction which showed that we purchased a nationwide average of 31 MHz of 600 MHz low-band spectrum for $8.0 billion. This spectrum covered 328 million points of presence (“POPs”) as of December 31, 2017. See Note 5 - Goodwill, Spectrum Licenses and Other Intangible Assets included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information. |
As of December 31, 2017, T-Mobile owned approximately 41 MHz of low-band spectrum (600 MHz and 700 MHz), quadruple its pre-auction low-band holdings. The purchased spectrum covers 100% of the U.S.2020.
As of December 31, 2017, at least 10 MHz of 600 MHz spectrum covering over 1.2 million square miles and approximately 62 million POPs was clear and available for deployment.
T-Mobile has actively engaged with broadcasters to accelerate FCC clearance timelines, entering into approximately 40 agreements with several parties. These agreements will, in aggregate, accelerate clearing, bringing the total clearing target to over 100 million POPs expected by year-end 2018. We expect to reach a clearing target of 250 million POPs by year-end 2019. T-Mobile remains committed to assisting broadcasters occupying 600 MHz spectrum to move to new frequencies.
In addition to spectrum clearing, T-Mobile aggressively started deployments of 600 MHz spectrum, lighting up spectrum in 586 cities and towns in 28 states across the country, covering 300,000 square miles as of December 31, 2017.
We had two new 600 MHz-capable devices in our retail distribution for the 2017 holiday season (LG V30 and Samsung GS8 Active). We expect more than a dozen new smartphones to be rolled out in 2018 to be 600 MHz-capable.
Our 600 MHz spectrum holdings will be used to deploy America's first nationwide 5G network expected by 2020.
| |
• | Over the last year, we have entered into and closed on various agreements for the acquisition and exchange of 700 MHz A-Block, AWS and PCS spectrum licenses. See Note 5 – Goodwill, Spectrum Licenses and Other Intangible Assets of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information. |
We intend to opportunistically acquire spectrum licenses in private party transactions and future FCC spectrum license auctions.
Our wireless infrastructure included approximately 61,000 macro sites and approximately 18,000 distributed antenna system (DAS) and small cell sites as of December 31, 2017.
Network Coverage Growth
We continue to expand our coverage breadth and covered 322 million people with 4G LTE as of December 31, 2017.
By the end of 2018, we are targeting a population coverage of 325 million and a geographic coverage of 2.5 million square miles.
Network Speed Leadership
As “America��s Best Unlimited Network,” we offer the fastest nationwide 4G LTE upload and download speeds in the United States. The fourth quarter of 2017 is the 16th consecutive quarter we have led the industry in both categories, and this is based on the results of millions of user-generated speed tests.
Network Capacity Growth
We continue to expand our capacity through the re-farming of existing spectrum and implementation of new technologies including Voice over LTE (“VoLTE”), Carrier Aggregation, 4x4 MIMO, 256 Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (“QAM”) and Licensed Assisted Access (“LAA”).
VoLTE comprised almost 80% of total voice calls as of December 31, 2017, compared to 64% as of December 31, 2016. Moving voice traffic to VoLTE frees up spectrum and allows for the transition of spectrum currently used for 2G and 3G to 4G LTE. We are leading the U.S. wireless industry in the rate of VoLTE adoption.
Carrier aggregation is live for our customers in over 875 markets. This advanced technology delivers superior speed and performance by bonding multiple discrete spectrum channels together.
4x4 MIMO is currently available in over 475 markets. This technology effectively delivers twice the speed and incremental network capacity to customers by doubling the number of data paths between the cell site and a customer's device. We plan to start deploying massive MIMO (FD-MIMO) in selected locations later in 2018.
We have rolled out 256 QAM in over 925 markets. 256 QAM increases the number of bits delivered per transmission to enable faster speed. T-Mobile is the first carrier globally to have rolled out the combination of carrier aggregation, 4x4 MIMO and 256 QAM.
T-Mobile is implementing a significant small cell program. We plan to roll out 25,000 small cells in 2018 and early 2019. This is on top of the approximately 18,000 small cells and DAS nodes already rolled out as of the end of 2017. In conjunction with the small cell rollout, we have also started rolling out License Assisted Access. The first LAA small cell went live in New York City in the fourth quarter of 2017.
Distribution
Our network expansion has provided a unique opportunity to grow our distribution footprint by over 30 million POPs from the beginning of 2016 through year-end 2017, bringing our total distribution footprint to over 260 million people. In 2017, we built nearly 1,500 new T-Mobile stores and over 1,300 net new MetroPCS stores. Many of these additional stores are in geographic areas where T-Mobile had not previously competed. In 2017, we opened T-Mobile stores in more than 600 cities and towns where we did not previously have a retail presence.
As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately 20,100 total points of distribution, including approximately 2,200 direct owned stores, 13,300 exclusive third party locations and 4,600 non-exclusive third-party locations as well as distribution through our websites and customer care channels. Our distribution density in major metropolitan areas provides customers with the convenience of having retail and service locations close to where they live and work.
Expansion of our distribution footprint will continue in 2018. In 2018, our retail store expansion will be exclusively focused on Greenfield markets, building on this significant future growth opportunity.
Competition
The wireless telecommunicationscommunications services industry is highly competitive. We are the thirdsecond largest provider of postpaid service plans and the largest provider of prepaid service planswireless communications services in the U.S. as measured by our total postpaid and prepaid customers. Our competitors include other national carriers, such as AT&T Inc. (“AT&T”), and Verizon Communications, Inc. (“Verizon”) and Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”). AT&T and Verizon are significantly larger than us and enjoy greater resources and scale advantages as compared to us. In addition, our competitors include numerous smaller regional carriers, existing MVNOs, including TracFone Wireless, Inc. and, Comcast Corporation, (“Comcast”), and future MVNOs, such as Charter Communications, Inc., Altice USA, Inc. and DISH, many of which offer or plan to offer no-contract, postpaid and prepaid service plans. Competitors also include providers who offer similar communication services, such as voice, messaging and data services, using alternative technologies or services. Competitive factors within the wireless telecommunicationscommunications services industry include pricing, market saturation, service and product offerings, customer experience, network investment and quality, development and deployment of technologies availability of additional spectrum licenses and regulatory changes. Some competitors have shown a willingness to use aggressive pricing as a source of differentiation. Other competitors have sought to add ancillary services, like mobile video or music streaming services, to enhance their offerings. Taken together, the competitive factors we face continue to put pressure on growth and margins as companies compete to retain the current customer base and continue to add new customers.
Human Capital
Employees
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we employed approximately 51,00075,000 full-time and part-time employees, including network, retail, administrative and customer support functions.
Attraction and Retention
We employ a highly skilled workforce within a broad range of functions. Our employees are located throughout the United States, including Puerto Rico, to serve our nationwide network and retail operations. Our headquarters are located in Bellevue, Washington and Overland Park, Kansas.
We attract and retain our workforce through a dynamic and inclusive culture and by providing exceptional benefits, including:
•Competitive medical, dental and vision benefits;
•Annual stock grants to all full-time and part-time employees and a discounted Employee Stock Purchase Program;
•A 401(k) Savings Plan;
•LiveMagenta: a custom-branded program for employee engagement and well-being, including free access to life coaches, financial coaches and tools for healthy living;
•Access to personal health advocates offering independent guidance;
•Tuition assistance for all full-time and part-time employees; and
•A matching program for employee donations and volunteering.
To keep our employees safe during the Pandemic, we implemented remote working arrangements for many employees with a significant portion of our internal and global care employees transitioned to a work-from-home environment. We also encouraged our corporate and administrative employees to work remotely, if possible. For employees who did not have this option, we provided access to incremental paid time off for employees experiencing symptoms, taking care of children who were home due to school closures or caring for individuals impacted by the Pandemic. We also continue to encourage healthy practices such as social distancing and hand washing and have increased cleaning and sanitation in all our facilities and stores. See “Our Response - To Protect and Support Our Employees and Communities” included in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for information on actions we took to support our employees during the Pandemic.
Training and Development
We believe in providing opportunities for our employees to improve their skills and advance their careers. We do this through a variety of programs, including:
•Award-winning career and development programs for all employees at all levels;
•Transparent career paths available to employees and candidates that provide realistic progression timelines, salaries and expectations;
•A Customer Care organization that uses 96 types of programs to train over 42,000 front line representatives and leaders;
•A Leader-to-Executives Program that provides elite career track opportunities for select MBA students and graduates; and
•Training for employees with disabilities pursuant to U.S. Department of Labor standards.
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
Diversity, equity and inclusion (“DE&I”) have always been a part of the Un-carrier culture, and we are committed to having DE&I touch every aspect of our future as a bigger and better company. We are on a mission to increase diversity in leadership, talent pipelines, suppliers and customers while embedding inclusive behaviors across the business and investing in the communities we serve.
We have established six DE&I Employee Resource Groups and four sub-affinity groups that have helped us establish and maintain a culture of inclusion. Currently, we have over 55 DE&I chapters across the nation that help spearhead volunteer opportunities, events and meaningful conversation with employees at a local level. Our DE&I networks include the following:
•Accessibility Community at T-Mobile;
•Multicultural Alliance;
◦Asia Pacific & Allies Network;
◦Black Empowerment;
◦Indigenous Peoples Network;
◦Magenta Latinx Network;
•Multigenerational Network;
•Pride;
•Veterans & Allies Network; and
•Women & Allies Network.
We have established an External Diversity and Inclusion Council in connection with our civil rights memorandum of understanding. The council includes civil rights leaders representing a wide-range of underrepresented communities. Together with T-Mobile, the council will help identify ways to improve our efforts in focus areas such as corporate governance, workforce recruitment and retention, procurement, entrepreneurship, philanthropy and community investment.
Regulation
The FCC regulates many key aspects of our business, including licensing, construction, the operation and use of our network, modifications of our network, control and ownership of our licenses and authorizations, the sale, transfer and acquisition of certain licenses, domestic roaming arrangements and interconnection agreements, pursuant to its authority under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (“Communications Act”). The FCC has a number of complex requirements and proceedings that affect our operations and pending proceedings regarding additional or modified requirements that could increase our costs or diminish our revenues. For example, the FCC has rules regarding provision of 911 and E-911 services, porting telephone numbers, interconnection, roaming, internet openness or net neutrality, disabilities access, privacy and cybersecurity, consumer protection and the universal service and Lifeline programs. Many of these and other issues are being considered in ongoing proceedings, and we cannot predict whether or how such actions will affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.operating results. Our ability to provide services and generate revenues could be harmed by adverse regulatory action or changes to existing laws and regulations. In addition, regulation of companies that offer competing services can impact our business indirectly.
WirelessExcept for operations in certain unlicensed frequency bands, wireless communications services providers generally must be licensed by the FCC to provide communications services at specified spectrum frequencies within specified geographic areas and must comply with the rules and policies governing the use of the spectrum as adopted by the FCC. The FCC issues each license for a fixed period of time, typically 1010-15 years independing on the case of cellular, PCS and point-to-point microwaveparticular licenses. AWS licenses have an initial term of 15 years, with successive 10-year terms thereafter. While the FCC has generally renewed licenses given to operating companies like us, the FCC has authority to both revoke a license for cause and to deny a license renewal if a renewal is not in the public interest. Furthermore, we could be subject to fines, forfeitures and other penalties for failure to comply with FCC regulations, even if any such non-compliancenoncompliance was unintentional. In extreme cases, penalties can include revocation of our licenses. The loss of any licenses, or any related fines or forfeitures, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Additionally, Congress’Congress’s and the FCC’s allocation of additional spectrum for broadband commercial mobile radio service (“CMRS”), which includes cellular, PCS and specialized mobile radio,other wireless services, could significantly increase and intensify competition. We cannot assess the impact that any developments that may occur in the U.S. economy or any future spectrum allocations by the FCC may have on license values. FCC spectrum auctions and other market developments may adversely affect the market value of our licenses or our competitive position in the future. A significant decline in the value of our licenses could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the FCC periodically reviews its policies on how to evaluate carriers’ spectrum holdings. A change in these policies could affect spectrum resources and competition among us and other carriers.
Congress and the FCC have imposed limitations on foreign ownership of CMRS licensees that exceed 20% direct ownership or 25% indirect ownership.ownership through an entity controlling the licensee. The FCC has ruled that higher levels of indirect foreign ownership, even up to 100%, are presumptively consistent with the public interest, albeit subject to review.but must be reviewed and approved. Consistent with that established policy, the FCC has issued a declaratory ruling authorizing up to 100% ownership of our companyCompany by Deutsche Telekom. This declaratory ruling,DT.
For our Educational Broadband Service (“EBS”) licenses in the 2.5 GHz band, FCC rules previously limited eligibility to hold EBS licenses to accredited educational institutions and ourcertain governmental, religious and nonprofit entities, while permitting those license holders to lease up to 95% of their capacity for non-educational purposes. Therefore, we primarily access EBS spectrum through long-term leasing arrangements with EBS license holders. Our EBS spectrum leases typically have an initial
term equal to the remaining term of the EBS license, with an option to renew the lease for additional terms, for a total lease term of up to 30 years. On April 27, 2020, the FCC lifted the restriction on who can hold EBS licenses are conditioned on Deutsche Telekom’s and the Company’s compliance with a network security agreement
with the Department30-year limitation on lease duration, among other changes. T-Mobile has started to acquire some of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Homeland Security. Failurethese EBS licenses but we continue to comply with the terms of this agreement could result in fines, injunctions and other penalties, including potential revocationlease most of our spectrum licenses.in this band and expect that to be the case for some time. The elimination of these restrictions will allow and may encourage current license holders to sell their licenses to other parties, including to T-Mobile. While a majority of our leases have contractual provisions enabling us to match offers, we may be forced to compete with others to purchase 2.5 GHz licenses on the secondary market and expend additional capital earlier than we may have anticipated.
While the Communications Act generally preempts state and local governments from regulating the entry of, or the rates charged by, wireless communicationcommunications services providers, certain state and local governments regulate other terms and conditions of wireless service, including billing, termination of service arrangements and the imposition of early termination fees, advertising, network outages, the use of devices while driving, zoning and land use. Additionally,Notwithstanding this federal preemption, in response to the Pandemic, several state legislatures are considering bills that could potentially set prices, minimum performance standards, and/or restrictions on service discontinuation that could impact our business in those states.
In addition, following the FCC’s adoption of the 2017 Restoring Internet Freedom (“RIF”) Order reclassifying broadband internet access services as Title I (non-common carrier services), a number of states have sought to impose state-specific net neutrality and privacy requirements on providers’ broadband services. The FCC’s RIF Order preempted such state efforts, which are inconsistent with the FCC’s federal deregulatory approach. Recently, however, the DC Circuit issued a ruling largely upholding the RIF Order, but also vacating the portion of the ruling broadly preempting state/local net neutrality laws. The court left open the prospect that particular state laws could still unlawfully conflict with the FCC net neutrality rules and be preempted; court challenges to some state enactments are pending.
While most states are largely seeking to codify the repealed federal rules, there are differences in some states, notably California, which has passed separate privacy and net neutrality legislation. There are also efforts within Congress to pass federal legislation to codify uniform federal privacy and net neutrality requirements, while also ensuring the preemption of separate state requirements, including the California laws. If not preempted or rescinded, separate state requirements will impose significant business costs and could also result in increased litigation costs and enforcement risks. State authority over wireless broadband services will remain unsettled until final action by the courts or Congress.
In addition, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and other federal agencies have asserted that they have jurisdiction over some consumer protection and elimination and prevention of anticompetitive business practices with respect to the provision of non-common carrier services. Further, the FCC and the Federal Aviation Administration regulate the siting, lighting and construction of transmitter towers and antennae. Tower siting and construction are also subject to state and local zoning, as well as federal statutes regarding environmental and historic preservation. The future costs to comply with all relevant regulations are to some extent unknown, and changes to regulations, or the applicability of regulations, could result in higher operating and capital expenses, or reduced revenues in the future.
Available Information
The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically at www.sec.gov. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and all other reportsQuarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed with or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SEC,Exchange Act are also publicly available free of charge on the Investor Relationsinvestor relations section of our website at investor.t-mobile.com or at www.sec.gov as soon as reasonably practicable after these materialsthey are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our corporate governance guidelines, director selection guidelines, code of ethics for senior financial officers, code of business conduct, speak up policy, supplier code of conduct, and charters for the audit, compensation, nominating and corporate governance, executive and executiveCEO selection committees of our Board of Directors are also posted on the Investor Relationsinvestor relations section of our website at investor.t-mobile.com. The information on our websiteswebsite is not part of this or any other report we file with, or furnishesfurnish to, the SEC.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information contained in this Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in
evaluating T-Mobile. Our business, financial condition, liquidity, or operating results, as well as the price of our common stock and other securities, could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks.
Risks Related to Our Business and the Wireless Industry
The Pandemic has adversely affected, and will continue to adversely affect, our business, liquidity, financial condition and operating results.
The Pandemic has impacted, and will continue to impact, the demand for our products and services, the ways in which our customers use them, where and how we work, and our suppliers and vendors’ ability to provide products to us. As a result, our business, liquidity, financial condition, and operating results have been, and will continue to be, adversely impacted by the Pandemic.
To ensure the safety of both customers and employees, we continue to open, close, and limit capacity of our retail stores in compliance with local and state mandates and orders. However, even when we are able to open stores and provide safe and healthy operating environments, we have seen and may continue to see decreased traffic and therefore lower switching activity in the industry.
In addition, the Pandemic has impacted customers’ ability to pay, and we expect to continue to work with them to help them maintain service and become current on their accounts, which may materially and adversely impact our financial results. These efforts may divert resources from our network buildout and put additional strain on our network, potentially leading to impacts on customer experience.
Even after the Pandemic has subsided, we may continue to experience impacts to our business as a result of the Pandemic’s global economic impact and any recession that has occurred or may occur in the future. Further, as the Pandemic situation is unprecedented and continuously evolving, the Pandemic may also affect our operating and financial results in a manner that is not presently known to us or in a manner that we currently do not consider to present significant risks to our operations.
Economic, political and market conditions, including those caused by the Pandemic, may adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.
Our business, financial condition and operating results are sensitive to changes in general economic conditions, including interest rates, consumer credit conditions, consumer debt levels, consumer confidence, rates of inflation (or concerns about deflation), unemployment rates, economic growth, energy costs, and other macro-economic factors.
Our services and device financing plans are available to a broad customer base, a significant segment of which may be vulnerable to weak economic conditions, particularly our subprime customers. We may have greater difficulty in gaining new customers within this segment, and existing customers may be more likely to terminate service and default on device financing plans due to an inability to pay.
Further, because we offer a device leasing plan, we expect to realize economic benefit from the estimated residual value of a leased device, which reflects the estimated fair value of the underlying asset at the end of the expected lease term. Changes in residual value assumptions made at lease inception affect the amount of depreciation expense and the net amount of equipment under operating leases. If estimated residual values, in the aggregate, significantly decline due to economic factors, including COVID-19 impacts, obsolescence, or other circumstances, we may not realize such residual value. Sprint historically suffered, and we may suffer, negative consequences including increased costs and increased losses on devices as a result of a lease customer default, the related termination of a lease, and the attempted repossession of the device, including failure of a lease customer to return a leased device.
Weak economic conditions and credit conditions may also adversely impact our suppliers, dealers, and MVNOs, some of which may file for bankruptcy, or may experience cash flow or liquidity problems, or may be unable to obtain or refinance credit such that they may no longer be able to operate. Any of these could adversely impact our ability to distribute, market, or sell our products and services.
Competition, industry consolidation, and changes in the market for wireless services could negatively affect our ability to attract and retain customers and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We have multiple wireless competitors, somemany of which have greater resources than uspossess either more or different access to strategic capital assets, and yet we compete for customers based principally on service/device offerings; price;offerings, price, network coverage, speed and quality;quality and customer
service. We expect market saturation to continue to cause the wireless industry’s customer growth rate to be moderate in comparison with historical growth rates, or possibly negative, leading to ongoing competition for customers. We also expect that our customers’ appetite for data services will place increasing demands on our network capacity. This competition and our capacity will continue to put pressure on pricing and margins as companies compete for potential customers.a relatively fixed pool of customers with an ever-expanding variety of products and services. Our ability to compete will depend on,upon, among other things, continued absolute and relative improvement in network quality and customer service, effective marketing and selling of products and services, innovation, and attractive pricing, and cost management, all of which will involve significant expenses.
Joint ventures, mergers, acquisitions and strategic alliances in the wireless sector have resulted in and are expected to result in larger competitors competing for a limited number of customers. The two largest national wireless communication providers currently serve a significant percentage of all wireless customers and hold significant spectrum and other resources. Our largest competitors may be able to enter into exclusive handset, device, or content arrangements, execute pervasive advertising and marketing campaigns, or otherwise improve their cost position relative to ours. In addition, refusal of our large competitors to provide critical access to resources and inputs, such as roaming services on reasonable terms, could improve their position within the wireless broadband mobile services industry.
We face intense and increasing competition from other service providers as industry sectors converge, such as cable, telecom services and content, satellite, and other service providers. Companies likesuch as Altice, Charter and DISH are diversifying outside cable, voice and broadband services to also offer wireless services. Competitors such as Comcast and AT&T (and AT&T’s proposed acquisition of Time Warner, Inc.) will have the scale and assets to aggressively compete in a converging industry. Verizon, through the acquisitions of AOL, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. is also a significant competitor focusing on premium content offerings to diversify outside of core wireless. Further, some of our competitors now provide original content services in addition to wireless, cable, voice and
broadband services, and consumers are increasingly accessing video content from Internet-based providers and applications, all of which create increased competition in this area. These factors, together with the effects of the increasing aggregate penetration of wireless services in all metropolitan areas and the ability of our larger competitors to use resources to build out their networks and to quickly deploy advanced technologies, such as 5G, could make it more difficult for us to continue to attract and retain customers, and may adversely affect our competitive position and ability to grow, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
The scarcityJoint ventures, mergers, acquisitions and cost of additional wireless spectrum, and regulations relating to spectrum use, may adversely affect our business strategy and financial condition and operating results.
We will need to acquire additional spectrum in order to continue our customer growth, expand and deepen our coverage, maintain our quality of service, meet increasing customer demands and deploy new technologies. We will be at a competitive disadvantage and possibly experience erosionstrategic alliances in the quality of service in certain markets if we fail to gain access to necessary spectrum before reaching network capacity. As a result, we are actively seeking to make additional investment in spectrum, which could be significant.
The continued interestwireless sector have resulted in, and are expected to result in, larger competitors competing for a limited number of customers. Further consolidation, including the pending acquisition of spectrumTracFone Wireless by existing carriers and others may reduce our ability to acquire and/or increase the cost of acquiring spectrum in the secondary market orVerizon, could negatively impact our abilitybusinesses, including wholesale. We will experience declining revenues from our wholesale business if Verizon migrates legacy TracFone customers off the T-Mobile network and DISH migrates Boost customers to gaintheir standalone network. Our competitors may also enter into exclusive handset, device, or content arrangements, execute pervasive advertising and marketing campaigns, or otherwise improve their cost position relative to ours. In addition, refusal of our competitors to provide critical access to spectrum through other means, including government auctions. We may need to enter into spectrum sharing resources and inputs, such as roaming and/or leasing arrangements, which are subject to certain risks and uncertainties and may involve significant expenditures. Gaining access to the spectrum we won in the FCC 600 MHz auction in 2017 may take up to three years or more. Any material delaybackhaul services, on reasonable terms could adversely impact our ability to implement our plans and efforts to improve our network. In addition, our return on investment in spectrum depends on our ability to attract additional customers and to provide additional services and usage to existing customers. As a result, the return on any investment in spectrum that we make may not be as much as we anticipate or take longer than expected. Additionally, we may be unable to secure the spectrum we need in any auction we may elect to participate in or in the secondary market, on favorable terms or at all.
The FCC may impose conditions on the use of new wireless broadband mobile spectrum that may negatively impact our ability to obtain spectrum economically or in appropriate configurations or coverage areas. Additional conditions that may be imposed by the FCC include heightened build-out requirements, limited license terms or renewal rights, and clearing obligations that may make it less attractive or less economical to acquire spectrum. In addition, rules may be established for future government spectrum auctions that may negatively impact our ability to obtain spectrum economically or in appropriate configurations or coverage areas.business.
If we cannot acquire needed spectrum from the government or otherwise, if competitors acquire spectrum that will allow them to provide services competitive with our services, or if we cannot deploy services over acquired spectrum on a timely basis without burdensome conditions, at reasonable cost, and while maintaining network quality levels, then our ability to attract and retain customers and our associated financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
If we are unable to take advantage of technological developments on a timely basis, we may experience a decline in demand for our services or face challenges in implementing or evolving our business strategy.
Significant technological changes continue to impact the communications industry. In general, these technological changes enhance communications and enable a broader array of companies to offer services competitive with ours. In order to grow and remain competitive with new and evolving technologies in our industry, we will need to adapt to future changes in technology, continually invest in our network, enhance our existing offerings, and introduce new offerings to address our current and potential customers’ changing demands. Enhancing our network, such as deploying 5G, is subject to risk from equipment changes and migration of customers from existing spectrum bands and the potential inability to secure spectrum necessary to deploy advanced technologies. Adopting new and sophisticated technologies may result in implementation issues such as scheduling and supplier delays, unexpected or increased costs, technological constraints, regulatory permitting issues, customer dissatisfaction, and other issues that could cause delays in launching new technological capabilities, which in turn could result in significant costs or reduce the anticipated benefits of the upgrades. In general, the development of new services in the wireless telecommunications industry will require us to anticipate and respond to the continuously changing demands of our customers, which we may not be able to do accurately or timely. If our new services fail to retain or gain acceptance in the marketplace or if costs associated with these services are higher than anticipated, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
We could be harmed by data loss or other security breaches, whether directly or by way of third parties.indirectly.
Our business like that of most retailers and wireless companies, involves the receipt, storage and transmission of our customers’ confidential information, including sensitive personal information and payment card information, confidential information about our employees and suppliers, and other sensitive information about our Company, such as our business plans, transactions and intellectual property (“confidential information”(collectively, “Confidential Information”). Unauthorized access to confidential informationConfidential Information may be difficult to anticipate, detect, or prevent, particularly given that the methods of unauthorized access constantly change and evolve. We may experienceare subject to the threat of unauthorized access or distributiondisclosure of confidential informationConfidential Information by state-sponsored parties, malicious actors, third parties or employees, errors or breaches by third partythird-party suppliers, or other breaches of security incidents that could compromise the confidentiality and integrity of confidentialConfidential Information.
We have previously notified affected customers of incidents involving unauthorized access to certain customer information in compliance with applicable laws concerning customer notice, and we expect we will provide such notices again. For example, in December 2020, we notified a small number of customers of unauthorized access to their account information that is considered “customer proprietary network information” by the FCC. More typically, such incidents involved attempts to commit fraud by taking control of a customer’s phone line. In a few cases, incidents involved unauthorized access to credit card information, financial data, social security numbers or passwords. While we do not believe these security incidents were material and actions were taken to prevent reoccurrence, we expect to continue to be the target of cyber-attacks, data breaches, canor security incidents, which may in the future have a materiallymaterial adverse effect on our business, or damage our reputation.reputation, financial condition, and operating results.
Cyber-attacks, such as denial of service and other malicious attacks, could disrupt our internal systems and applications, impair our ability to provide services to our customers, and have other adverse effects on our business and that of others who depend on our services. As a telecommunications carrier, we are considered a critical infrastructure provider and therefore may be more likely to be the target of such attacks.cyber-attacks (e.g., denial of service and other malicious attacks). Such attacks against companies may be perpetrated by a variety of groups or persons, including those in jurisdictions where law enforcement measures to address such attacks are ineffective or unavailable, and such attacks may even be perpetrated by or at the behest of foreign governments.
In addition, we provide confidential, proprietary and personal information to third-party service providers when it is necessary to pursueas part of our business objectives. We and ouroperations. These third-party service providers have been subject toexperienced data breaches and other attacks that included unauthorized access to confidential informationConfidential Information in the past, includingand face security challenges common to all parties that collect and
process information. Past data breaches include a breach atof the networks of one of our credit checkdecisioning providers in September 2015, induring which a subset of records containing current and potential customer information was compromisedacquired by an external party.
Our procedures and safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data and to defend against attacks seeking to disrupt our services must be continually evaluated and revised to address the ever-evolving threat landscape. We cannot make assurances that all preventive actions taken will adequately repel a significant attack or prevent information security breaches or the misuses of data, unauthorized access by third parties or employees, or exploits against third-party supplier environments. If we or our third-party suppliers are subject to such attacks or security breaches, we may incur significant costs or other material financial impacts, which may not be covered by, or may exceed the coverage limits of, our cyber insurance, be subject to regulatory investigations, sanctions and private litigation, experience disruptions to our operations or suffer damage to our reputation. Any future cyber-attacks, data breaches, or security breachesincidents may materiallyhave a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
The scarcity and cost of additional wireless spectrum, and regulations relating to spectrum use, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
As a result of completing the Transactions, we acquired additional spectrum from Sprint, including 2.5 GHz spectrum, that we need in order to continue our customer growth, expand and deepen our coverage, maintain our quality of service, meet increasing customer demands, and deploy new technologies. Although the Merger has reduced our immediate need to acquire additional spectrum, as we continue to enhance the quality of our services in certain geographic areas and deploy new technologies, including 5G, we may acquire additional spectrum in the future. As a result, we will continue to actively seek to make additional investment in spectrum, which could be significant.
The continued interest in, and acquisition of, spectrum by existing carriers and others may reduce our ability to acquire and/or increase the cost of acquiring spectrum in the secondary market or negatively impact our ability to gain access to spectrum through other means, including government auctions. Our return on investment in spectrum depends on our ability to attract additional customers and to provide additional services and usage to existing customers. Additionally, the FCC may not be able to provide sufficient additional spectrum to auction or we may be unable to secure the spectrum necessary to maintain or enhance our competitive position in any auction we may elect to participate in or in the secondary market, on favorable terms or at all.
The FCC may impose conditions on the acquisition and use of new wireless broadband mobile spectrum that may negatively impact our ability to obtain spectrum economically or in appropriate configurations or coverage areas.
If we cannot acquire needed spectrum from the government or otherwise, if competitors acquire spectrum that will allow them to provide services competitive with our services, or if we cannot deploy services over acquired spectrum on a timely basis without burdensome conditions, at reasonable cost, and while maintaining network quality levels, our ability to attract and retain customers and our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.
We rely on highly skilled personnel throughout all levels of our business. Our business could be harmed if we are unable to retain or motivate key personnel, hire qualified personnel or maintain our corporate culture.
The market for highly skilled workers and leaders in our industry is extremely competitive. We believe that our future success depends in substantial part on our ability to recruit, hire, motivate, develop, and retain talented personnel for all areas of our organization, including our CEO and the other members of our senior leadership team. In addition, certain members of our senior leadership team, including our CEO have term employment agreements with us. Our inability to extend the terms of these employment agreements or to replace these members of our senior leadership team at the end of their terms with qualified and capable successors could hinder our strategic planning and execution. Doing so may be difficult due to many factors, including fluctuations in economic and industry conditions, changes to U.S. immigration policy, competitors’ hiring practices, employee tolerance for the significant amount of change within and demands on our Company and our industry, and the effectiveness of our compensation programs.
In addition, uncertainty about the process of integrating T-Mobile’s and Sprint’s businesses could have an adverse impact on our employees. These uncertainties may impact our ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel, as existing and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with us. If key employees depart, our business could be negatively impacted. We may incur significant costs in identifying, hiring and replacing departing employees and may lose
significant expertise and talent. As a result, we may not be able to meet our business plan and our revenue growth and profitability may be materially adversely affected.
If we are unable to take advantage of technological developments on a timely basis, we may experience a decline in demand for our services or face challenges in implementing or evolving our business strategy.
Significant technological changes continue to impact the communications industry. In order to grow and remain competitive, we will need to adapt to future changes in technology, continually invest in our network, increase network capacity, enhance our existing offerings, and introduce new offerings to address our current and potential customers’ changing demands. Enhancing our network, including our 5G network, is subject to risk from equipment changes and migration of customers from older technologies. Adopting new and sophisticated technologies may result in implementation issues such as scheduling and supplier delays, unexpected or increased costs, technological constraints, regulatory permitting issues, customer dissatisfaction, and other issues that could cause delays in launching new technological capabilities, which in turn could result in significant costs or reduce the anticipated benefits of the upgrades. If our new services fail to retain or gain acceptance in the marketplace or if costs associated with these services are higher than anticipated, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, brand, financial condition and operating results.
System failures and business disruptions may allow unauthorized use of or interference with our network and other systems, which could be materially adversely affect our reputation and financial condition.
To be successful, we must provide our customers with reliable, trustworthy service and protect the communications, location, and personal information shared or generated by our customers. We rely upon both our systems and networks - those of suppliers and the systems and networks of other providers, and suppliersin addition to our own - to provide and support our services and, in some cases, protect our customers’ information and our information. Failure of ourSystem, network or others’ systems, networks, or infrastructure failures may prevent us from providing reliable service or may allow for the unauthorized use of or interference with our networks and other systems or for the compromise of customer information. Examples of these risks include:
•human error such as responding to deceptive communications or unintentionally executing malicious code;
•physical damage, power surges or outages, or equipment failure with respect to both our wireless and wireline networks, including those as a result of severe weather and, natural disasters, public health crises, terrorist attacks, political instability and volatility, and acts of war;
•theft of customer and/or proprietary information offered for sale for competitive advantage or corporate extortion;
•unauthorized access to our IT and business systems or to our network and critical infrastructure and those of our suppliers and other providers;
•supplier failures or delays; and
•system failures or outages of our business systems or communications network.
Such events could cause us to lose customers, lose revenue, incur expenses, suffer reputational damage, and subject us to fines, penalties, adverse actions or judgments, litigation or governmental investigation. Remediation costs could include liability for information loss, costs of repairing infrastructure and systems, and/or costs of incentives offered to customers. Our insurance may not cover, or be adequate to fully reimburse us for, costs and losses associated with such events.
The challenges in satisfying the large number of Government Commitments in the required time frames and the significant cumulative cost incurred in tracking, monitoring and complying with them could adversely impact our business, financial condition and operating results.
In connection with the regulatory proceedings and approvals required to close the Transactions, we agreed to various Government Commitments. These Government Commitments include, among other things, extensive 5G network build-out commitments, obligations to deliver high-speed wireless services to the vast majority of Americans, and marketing an in-home broadband product to households where spectrum capacity is sufficient. Other Government Commitments relate to national security, pricing and availability of rate plans, employment, substantial monetary contributions to support organizations, and implementation of diversity and inclusion initiatives. The majority of the Government Commitments specify time frames for compliance and reporting. Failure to fulfill our obligations under these Government Commitments in a timely manner could result in substantial fines, penalties, or other legal and administrative actions.
We areexpect to incur significant costs, expenses and fees to track, monitor, comply with and fulfill our obligations under these Government Commitments. In addition, abiding by the Government Commitments may divert our management’s time and energy away from other business operations and could force us to make business decisions we would not otherwise make and forego taking actions that might be beneficial to the Company. The challenges in satisfying the large number of Government Commitments in the processrequired time frames and the cost incurred in tracking, monitoring and complying with them could also adversely impact our business, financial condition and operating results and hinder our ability to effectively compete.
Our business may be adversely impacted if we are not able to successfully manage the ongoing commercial and transition services arrangements entered into in connection with the Divestiture Transaction and known or unknown liabilities arising in connection therewith.
In connection with the closing of implementingthe Divestiture Transaction, we and DISH entered into certain commercial and transition services arrangements, including a new billing system,Master Network Services Agreement (the “MNSA”) and a Spectrum Purchase Agreement (the “Spectrum Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the MNSA, DISH will receive network services from the Company for a period of seven years. As set forth in the MNSA, the Company will provide DISH, among other things, (a) legacy network services for certain Boost Mobile prepaid end users on the Sprint network, (b) T-Mobile network services for certain end users that have been migrated to the T-Mobile network or provisioned on the T-Mobile network by or on behalf of DISH and (c) infrastructure mobile network operator services to assist in the access and integration of the DISH network. Pursuant to the Spectrum Purchase Agreement, DISH has agreed to purchase all of Sprint’s 800 MHz spectrum (approximately 13.5 MHz of nationwide spectrum) for a total of approximately $3.6 billion; provided, however, that if DISH breaches the Spectrum Purchase agreement prior to the closing or fails to deliver the purchase price following the satisfaction or waiver of all closing conditions, DISH’s sole liability will be to pay us a fee of approximately $72 million. In such instance, T-Mobile may be required to conduct an auction sale of all of Sprint’s 800 MHz spectrum under the terms set forth in the Consent Decree, but would not be required to divest such spectrum for an amount less than $3.6 billion. The covered spectrum sale will not occur before the third anniversary of the Merger (i.e., not before April 1, 2023), but must be divested within the later of three years after the closing of the Divestiture Transaction and five days after receipt of the approval from the FCC for the transfer, following an application for FCC approval to be filed by the third anniversary of the closing of the Merger. T-Mobile may exercise an option to lease back 4 MHz (2 MHz downlink + 2 MHz uplink) of the spectrum for two years following the closing of the 800 MHz spectrum sale at the same per person rate used to calculate the purchase price paid by DISH to T-Mobile – a rate of approximately $68 million per year.
Failure to successfully manage these ongoing commercial and transition services arrangements entered into in connection with the Divestiture Transaction and liabilities arising in connection therewith may result in material unanticipated problems, including diversion of management time and energy, significant expenses and liabilities. There may also be other potential adverse consequences and unforeseen increased expenses or liabilities associated with the Divestiture Transaction, the occurrence of which will support a portioncould materially impact our business, financial condition, liquidity and operating results. In addition, there may be an increase in competition from DISH and other third parties that DISH may enter into commercial agreements with, who are significantly larger and with greater resources and scale advantages as compared to us. Such increased competition may result in our loss of our subscribers, while maintaining our legacy billing system. customers and other business relationships.
Any unanticipated difficulties, disruption,acquisition, investment, or merger may subject us to significant delays could have adverse operational, financial, and reputational effects onrisks, any of which may harm our business.
We are currently implementingmay pursue acquisitions of, investments in or mergers with businesses, technologies, services and/or products that complement or expand our business. Some of these potential transactions could be significant relative to the size of our business and operations. Any such transaction would involve a newnumber of risks and could present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including:
•diversion of management attention from running our existing business;
•increased costs to integrate the networks, spectrum, technology, personnel, customer billing system, which involves a new third-party supported platformbase and utilizationbusiness practices of a phased deployment approach. Post implementation, we planthe business involved in any such transaction with our business;
•difficulties in effectively integrating the financial and operational systems of the business involved in any such transaction into (or supplanting such systems with) our financial and operational reporting infrastructure and internal control framework in an effective and timely manner;
•potential exposure to operate both the existing and new billing systems in parallel to aidmaterial liabilities not discovered in the transitiondue diligence process or as a result of any litigation arising in connection with any such transaction;
•significant transaction-related expenses in connection with any such transaction, whether consummated or not;
•risks related to the new system until all phases of the conversion are complete.
The implementation may cause major system or business disruptions, or we may fail to implement the new billing system in a timely or effective manner. In addition, the third-party billing services supporting vendor may experience errors, cyber-attacks, or other operational disruptions that could negatively impact us and over which we may have limited control. Interruptions and/or failure of this new billing services system could disrupt our operations and impact our ability to provideobtain any required regulatory approvals necessary to consummate any such transaction;
•acquisition financing may not be available on reasonable terms or bill forat all and any such financing could significantly increase our services, retain customers, attract new customers,outstanding indebtedness or negatively impact overall customer experience. Any occurrenceotherwise affect our capital structure or credit ratings; and
•any business, technology, service, or product involved in any such transaction may significantly under-perform relative to our expectations, and we may not achieve the benefits we expect from the transaction, which could, among other things, also result in a write-down of the foregoing could causegoodwill and other intangible assets associated with such transaction.
For any or all of these reasons, acquisitions, investments, or mergers may have a material adverse effectseffect on our operations andbusiness, financial condition material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and reputational damage.operating results.
We rely on third parties to provide products orand services for the operation of our business, and athe failure or inability byof such parties to provide these products or services could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We depend heavily on suppliers, service providers, their subcontractors and other third parties in order for us to efficiently operate our business. Due to the complexity of our business, it is not unusual for multiple vendors located in multiple locationsto engage a diverse set of suppliers to help us to develop, maintain, and troubleshoot products and services such as wireless and wireline network components, software development services, and billing and customer service support. OurSome of our suppliers may provide services from outside of the United States, which carries associated additional regulatory and legal obligations. We commonly rely upon theon suppliers to provide us with contractual assurances and to disclose accurate information regarding risks associated with their provision of products or services in accordance with our expectationspolicies and standards, such asincluding our supplier codeSupplier Code of conductConduct and our third party-riskthird-party risk management standards. Failurepractices. The failure of suchour suppliers to comply with our expectations and standardspolicies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
There are multiple sources forMany of the types of products and services we purchase or use.use are available through multiple sources and suppliers. However, there are a limited number of suppliers forwho can support or provide billing services, voice and data communications transport services, wireless or wireline network infrastructure, equipment, handsets, other devices, and payment processing services, among other products and services. Disruptions or failure of such suppliers to adequately perform could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
In the past, ourOur suppliers, contractors, service providers and third-party retailerstheir subcontractors may not have always performedperform at the levels we expectedexpect or at the levels required by their contracts. Our suppliers are also subject to their own risks, including, but not limited to, economic, financial and credit conditions and the risks of natural catastrophic events such as earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and public health crises such as the Pandemic. Our business could be severely disrupted if keycritical suppliers contractors,or service providers or third-party retailers fail to comply with their contracts or become unable to continue provision of services or supplies. Our business could also be disrupted if we experience delays or service degradation during any transition to a new outsourcing provider or other supplier or if we are required to replace the supplied products or services with those from another source, especially if the replacement becomes necessary on short notice. Any such disruptions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Economic, political, and market conditions may adversely affect our business,Our financial condition and operating results will be negatively affected if we experience high fraud rates or volumes related to device financing, customer payment cards, third-party dealers, employees, subscriptions, identities or account takeover fraud.
Our operating costs could increase substantially as wella result of fraud, including any fraud related to device financing, customer payment cards, third-party dealers, employees, subscriptions, service use/abuse, or account takeover fraud. If our fraud strategies and processes are not successful in detecting, mitigating, and preventing fraud, the resulting loss of revenue or increased expenses could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operation results. This includes fraudulent activities perpetrated directly against us or through the systems, processes, and operations of third parties such as national retailers, dealers, and others.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness
Our substantial level of indebtedness could adversely affect our accessbusiness flexibility and increase our borrowing costs.
We have, and we expect that we will continue to financinghave, a substantial amount of debt. Our substantial level of indebtedness could have the effect of, among other things, reducing our flexibility in responding to changing business, economic, market and
industry conditions and increasing the amount of cash required to service our debt. In addition, this level of indebtedness may reduce funds available to support efforts to integrate T-Mobile’s and Sprint’s businesses and realize the expected benefits of the Transactions, and may also reduce funds available for capital expenditures, share repurchases and other activities. Those impacts may put us at a competitive disadvantage relative to other companies with lower debt levels. Further, we may need to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future, subject to the restrictions contained in our debt instruments, which could increase the risks associated with our capital structure.
Because of our substantial indebtedness, there is a risk that we may not be able to service our debt obligations in accordance with their terms.
Our ability to service our substantial debt obligations will depend on favorablefuture performance, which will be affected by business, economic, market and industry conditions and other factors, including our ability to achieve the expected benefits of the Transactions. There is no guarantee that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt obligations when due. If we are unable to meet such obligations or fail to comply with the financial and other restrictive covenants contained in the agreements governing such debt obligations, we may be required to refinance all or part of our debt, sell important strategic assets at unfavorable prices or make additional borrowings. We may not be able to, at any given time, refinance our debt, sell assets or make additional borrowings on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Our business, financial condition, and operating results are sensitive to changes in general economic conditions, including interest rates, consumer credit conditions, consumer debt levels, consumer confidence, rates of inflation (or concerns about deflation), unemployment rates, economic growth, energy costs, and other macro-economic factors. Difficult, or worsening, general economic conditionsall, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Market volatility, political and economic uncertainty, and weak economic conditions, such as a recession or economic slowdown, may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results in a number of ways. Our services are available to a broad customer base, a significant segment of which may be more vulnerable to weak economic conditions. We may have greater difficulty in gaining new customers within this segment, and existing customers may be more likely to terminate service due to an inability to pay.
Weak economic conditions and credit conditions may also adversely impact our suppliers and dealers, some of which have filed for or may be considering bankruptcy, or may experience cash flow or liquidity problems, or are unable to obtain or refinance
credit such that they may no longer be able to operate. Any of these could adversely impact our ability to distribute, market, or sell our products and services.
In addition, instability in the global financial markets could lead to periodic volatility in the credit, equity, and fixed income markets. This volatility could limit our access to the credit markets, leading to higher borrowing costs or, in some cases, the inability to obtain financing on terms that are acceptable to us or at all.
Some or all of our variable-rate indebtedness may use the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) as a benchmark for establishing the rate. LIBOR will be discontinued after 2021 and will be replaced with an alternative reference rate. The consequence of this development cannot be entirely predicted but could include an increase in the cost of our variable rate indebtedness. In addition, any hedging agreements we have and may continue to enter into to limit our exposure to interest rate increases or foreign currency fluctuations may not offer complete protection from these risks or may be unsuccessful, and consequently may effectively increase the interest rate we pay on our debt or the exchange rate with respect to such debt, and any portion not subject to such hedging agreements would have full exposure to interest rate increases or foreign currency fluctuations, as applicable. If any financial institutions that are parties to our hedging agreements were to default on their payment obligations to us, declare bankruptcy or become insolvent, we would be unhedged against the underlying exposures. Any posting of collateral by us under our hedging agreements and the modification or termination of any of our hedging agreements could negatively impact our liquidity or other financial metrics. Any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
The agreements governing our indebtedness and other financing arrangementsfinancings include restrictive covenants that limit our operating
flexibility.
The agreements governing our indebtedness and other financing arrangementsfinancings impose significantmaterial operating and financial restrictions on us.restrictions. These restrictions, subject in certain cases to customary baskets, exceptions and maintenance and incurrence-based ratiofinancial tests, together with our debt service obligations, may limit our or our subsidiaries’ ability to engage in some transactions and pursue strategic business opportunities, including the following:
•incurring additional indebtedness and issuing preferred stock;
•paying dividends, redeeming capital stock or making other restricted payments or investments;
•selling, buying or buyingleasing assets, properties or licenses, including participating in future FCC auctions of spectrum or private sales of spectrum;
•developing assets, properties or licenses that we have or in the future may procure;
•creating liens on assets;assets securing indebtedness or other obligations;
•participating in future FCC auctions of spectrum or private sales of spectrum;
•engaging in mergers, acquisitions, business combinations or other transactions;
•entering into transactions with affiliates; and
placing restrictions on the ability of•our subsidiaries to paypaying dividends or makemaking other payments.payments to us.
These restrictions could limit our ability to obtain debt financing, make share repurchases, refinance or pay principal on our outstanding indebtedness, complete acquisitions for cash or indebtedness or react to business, economic, market and industry conditions and other changes in our operating environment or the economy. Any future indebtedness that we incur may contain similar or more restrictive covenants. Any failure to comply with the restrictions of our debt agreements and other financing arrangements may result in an event of default under these agreements, which in turn may result in defaults or acceleration of obligations under these agreements and other agreements, giving our lenders the right to terminate anythe commitments they had made to provide us with further funds andor the right to require us to repay all amounts then outstanding. Anyoutstanding plus any interest, fees, penalties or premiums. An event of default may also compel us to sell certain assets securing indebtedness under these events would have a material adverse effect onagreements.
Credit rating downgrades could adversely affect our business, cash flows, financial condition and operating results, which rely on investment-grade markets.
Credit ratings impact the cost and availability of future borrowings and, as a result, cost of capital. Our current ratings reflect each rating agency’s opinion of our financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet our debt obligations. Our capital structure and business model are reliant on continued access to the investment-grade debt markets. Each rating agency reviews our ratings periodically, and there can be no assurance that such ratings will be maintained in the future. A downgrade in our corporate rating and/or our issued investment-grade debt ratings, or our amount of secured debt outstanding, could impact our ability to access the investment-grade debt market and adversely affect our business, cash flows, financial condition and operating results.
Our significant indebtedness could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our ability to make payments on our debt, to repay our existing indebtedness when due, and to fund our capital-intensive business and operations, and significant planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future, which is in turn subject to the operational risks described elsewhere in this report. Our debt service obligations could have material adverse effects on our business, financial condition, and operating results, including by:
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business or the communications industry or pursuing growth opportunities;
reducing the amount of cash available for other operational or strategic needs; and
placing us at a competitive disadvantage to competitors who are less leveraged than we are.
Some of our debt also has a floating rate of interest linked to various indices. If the change in indices result in interest rate increases, debt service requirements will increase, which could adversely affect our cash flow and operating results. In addition, any agreements we have and may continue to enter into to limit our exposure to interest rate increases may not offer complete protection from this risk, and any portion not subject to such agreements would have full exposure to interest rate increases. Any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Failure to maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could result in a loss of investor confidence regarding our financial statements or may have a material adverse effect on our business.
Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we along with our independently registered public accounting firm are required to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We rely heavily on IT systems as an important part of our internal controls in order to operate, transact, and otherwise manage our business, as well as provide
effective and timely reporting of our financial results. Failure to design and maintain effective internal controls, including those over our IT systems, could constitute a material weakness that could result in inaccurate financial statements, inaccurate disclosures, or failure to prevent fraud. If we or our independent registered public accounting firm were unable to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting, investor confidence regarding our financial statements and our business could be materially adversely affected.
Our financial condition and operating results will be impaired if we experience high fraud rates related to device financing, credit cards, dealers, or subscriptions.
Our operating costs could increase substantially as a result of fraud, including device financing, customer credit card, subscription, or dealer fraud. If our fraud detection strategies and processes are not successful in detecting and controlling fraud, whether directly or by way of the systems, processes, and operations of third parties such as national retailers, dealers, and others, the resulting loss of revenue or increased expenses could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.
We rely on highly-skilled personnel throughout all levels of our business. Our business could be harmed if we are unable to retain or motivate key personnel, hire qualified personnel or maintain our corporate culture.
The market for highly-skilled workers and leaders in our industry is extremely competitive. We believe that our future success depends in substantial part on our ability to recruit, hire, motivate, develop, and retain talented and highly-skilled personnel for all areas of our organization. Doing so may be difficult due to many factors, including fluctuations in economic and industry conditions, changes to U.S. immigration policy, competitors’ hiring practices, employee tolerance for the significant amount of change within and demands on our Company and our industry, and the effectiveness of our compensation programs. Our continued ability to compete effectively depends on our ability to retain and motivate our existing employees and to attract new employees. If we do not succeed in retaining and motivating our existing key employees and attracting new key personnel, we may not be able to meet our business plan and, as a result, our revenue growth and profitability may be materially adversely affected.
Any acquisition, investment, or merger may subject us to significant risks, any of which may harm our business.
We may pursue acquisitions of, investments in or mergers with businesses, technologies, services and/or products that complement or expand our business. Some of these potential transactions could be significant relative to the size of our business and operations. Any such transaction would involve a number of risks and could present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including:
diversion of management attention from running our existing business;
increased costs to integrate the networks, spectrum, technology, personnel, customer base and business practices of the business involved in any such transaction with our business;
difficulties in effectively integrating the financial and operational reporting systems of the business involved in any such transaction into (or supplanting such systems with) our financial and operational reporting infrastructure and internal control framework in an effective and timely manner;
potential exposure to material liabilities not discovered in the due diligence process or as a result of any litigation arising in connection with any such transaction;
significant transaction expenses in connection with any such transaction, whether consummated or not;
risks related to our ability to obtain any required regulatory approvals necessary to consummate any such transaction;
acquisition financing may not be available on reasonable terms or at all and any such financing could significantly increase our outstanding indebtedness or otherwise affect our capital structure or credit ratings; and
any business, technology, service, or product involved in any such transaction may significantly under-perform relative to our expectations, and we may not achieve the benefits we expect from our transaction, which could, among other things, also result in a write-down of goodwill and other intangible assets associated with such transaction.
For any or all of these reasons, our pursuit of an acquisition, investment, or merger may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.
Risks Related to Legal and Regulatory Matters
Any material weaknesses we identify while we work to integrate and align policies, principles and practices of the two companies following the Merger, or any other failure by us to maintain effective internal controls, could result in a loss of investor confidence regarding our financial statements. Additionally, the trading price of our stock and our access to capital could be negatively impacted, and we could be subject to significant costs and reputational damage that could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition or operating results.
Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we, along with our independent registered public accounting firm, are required to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This requirement is subject to an exemption for business combinations during the most recent fiscal year, which we are utilizing due to the Merger. Any identified material weakness in internal control over financial reporting would still be reported, as obligated.
While we integrate and align the policies, principles and practices of the two companies following the Merger, as a result of the differences in control environments and cultures, we could identify material weaknesses that could result in materially inaccurate financial statements, materially inaccurate disclosures, or failure to prevent error or fraud for the combined company. There can be no assurance that remediation of any material weaknesses identified during integration of the two companies will be completed in a timely manner or that the remedial measures will prevent other control deficiencies or material weaknesses. If we are unable to remediate material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, then our ability to analyze, record and report financial information free of material misstatements, to prepare financial statements within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the SEC and otherwise to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act will be negatively impacted. The impact could negatively impact our business, financial condition or operating results, restrict our ability to access the capital markets, require the expenditure of significant resources to correct the weaknesses or deficiencies, subject us to fines, penalties, investigations or judgments, harm our reputation, or otherwise cause a decline in investor confidence.
Changes in regulations or in the regulatory framework under which we operate could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We are subject to regulatory oversight by various federal, state and local agencies, as well as judicial review and actions, on issues related to the wireless industry that include, but are not limited to, roaming, interconnection, spectrum allocation and licensing, facilities siting, pole attachments, intercarrier compensation, Universal Service Fund, 911 services, consumer protection, consumer privacy, and cybersecurity. We are also subject to regulations in connection with other aspects of our business, including device financing and insurance activities.
The FCC regulates the licensing, construction, modification, operation, ownership, sale, and interconnection of wireless communications systems, as do some state and local regulatory agencies. In particular, the FCC imposes significant regulation
on licensees of wireless spectrum with respect to how radio spectrum is used by licensees, the nature of the services that licensees may offer and how the services may be offered, and the resolution of issues of interference between spectrum bands. Additionally, the FTC and other federal and state agencies have asserted that they have jurisdiction over some consumer protection, and elimination and prevention of anticompetitive business practices with respect to the provision of wireless products and services. We are subject to regulatory oversight by various federal, state and local agencies, as well as judicial review and actions, on issues related to the wireless industry that include, but are not limited to: roaming, interconnection, spectrum allocation and licensing, facilities siting, pole attachments, intercarrier compensation, Universal Service Fund (“USF”), net neutrality, 911 services, consumer protection, consumer privacy, and cybersecurity. We are also subject to regulations in connection with other aspects of our business, including handset financing and insurance activities.
We cannot assure you that the FCC or any other federal, state or local agencies will not adopt regulations, implement new programs in response to the Pandemic, or take enforcement or other actions that would adversely affect our business, impose new costs, or require changes in current or planned operations. For example, in response to the Pandemic, T-Mobile implemented the Keep Americans Connected Pledge in March 2020, in which we pledged, through June 2020, to not terminate service for certain customers failing to pay their bills due to the Pandemic, to waive any such customers’ late fees, and to open our Wi-Fi hotspots to any American who needs them. Similarly, in response to the Pandemic, starting in January 2021 and extending at least 90 days, the California Public Utilities Commission adopted a resolution providing a moratorium on customer disconnects and late fees for certain California customers facing financial hardship. Additionally, under the Obama administration, the FCC established new net neutrality and privacy regimes that applied to our operations. Both sets of rules potentially subjected some of our initiatives and practices to more burdensome requirements and heightened scrutiny by federal and state regulators, the public, edge providers, and private litigants regarding whether such initiatives or practices are compliant. While the FCC rules are nowwere largely rolled back under the Trump administration, the FCC could possibly revisit that decision under the Biden administration. In addition, some state legislatorsstates and regulatorsother jurisdictions have enacted, or are seeking to replace them with stateconsidering enacting, laws in these areas (including, for example, the CCPA and CPRA as discussed below), and it is uncertain what rules may be promulgated under the Biden administration, perpetuating the risk and uncertainty regarding the regulatory environment and compliance around these issues.
In addition, states are increasingly focused on the quality of service and support that wireless communicationcommunications services providers provide to their customers and several states have proposed or enacted new and potentially burdensome regulations in this area. We also face potential investigations by, and inquiries from or actions by state Public Utility Commissions.public utility commissions. We also cannot assure you that Congress will not amend the Communications Act, from which the FCC obtains its authority, and which serves to limit state authority, or enact other legislation in a manner that could be adverse to our business.
Failure to comply with applicable regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. We could be subject to fines, forfeitures, and other penalties (including, in extreme cases, revocation of our spectrum licenses) for failure to comply with FCC or other governmental regulations, even if any such non-compliancenoncompliance was unintentional. The loss of any licenses, or any related fines or forfeitures, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Laws and regulations relating to the handling of privacy and data protection may result in increased costs, legal claims, fines against us, or reputational damage.
In January 2020, the California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”) became effective, creating new data privacy rights for California residents and new compliance obligations for us. We have incurred and will continue to incur significant implementation costs to ensure compliance with the CCPA, and we could see increased litigation costs. Moreover, a new privacy law, the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), was passed by Californians via ballot initiative during the November 3, 2020 election. The CPRA, which is scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2023 (with a lookback to January 1, 2022), will significantly modify the CCPA and will impose additional data protection obligations on companies such as ours doing business in California. Other states (such as Nevada) have passed or are considering similar legislation (such as Washington), which could create more risks and potential costs for us, especially to the extent the specific requirements vary from those in California, Nevada and other existing laws.
We have incurred and will continue to incur significant implementation costs to ensure compliance with the CCPA, the CPRA, and their related regulations and any additional laws and regulations could cause us to incur further costs or further constrain our business, strategies, offerings and initiatives.
Unfavorable outcomes of legal proceedings may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
We and our affiliates are regularly involved in a number of legalvarious disputes, governmental and/or regulatory inspections, investigations and proceedings before various state and federal courts, the FCC, the FTC, other federal agencies, and state and local regulatory agencies, including state attorneys general.litigation matters. Such legal proceedings can be complex, costly, and highly disruptive to our business operations by diverting the attention and energiesenergy of management and other key personnel.
In connection with the Transactions, it is possible that stockholders of T-Mobile and/or Sprint may file putative class action lawsuits or shareholder derivative actions against the Company and the legacy T-Mobile board of directors and/or the legacy Sprint board of directors. Among other remedies, these stockholders could seek damages. The outcome of any litigation is uncertain and any such potential lawsuits could result in substantial costs and may be costly and distracting to management.
Additionally, on April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we assumed the contingencies and litigation matters of Sprint. Those matters include a wide variety of disputes, claims, government agency investigations and enforcement actions and other proceedings, including, among other things, certain ongoing FCC and state government agency investigations into Sprint’s Lifeline program. In September 2019, Sprint notified the FCC that it had claimed monthly subsidies for serving customers even though those customers may not have met usage requirements under Sprint’s usage policy for the Lifeline program due to an inadvertent coding issue in the system used to identify qualifying customer usage that occurred in July 2017 while the system was being updated. Sprint has made a number of payments to reimburse the federal government and certain states for excess subsidy payments. Unfavorable resolution of these matters could require making additional reimbursements and paying additional fines and penalties.
On February 28, 2020, we received a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Admonishment from the FCC, which proposed a penalty against us for allegedly violating Section 222 of the Communications Act and the FCC’s regulations governing the privacy of customer information. We recorded an accrual for an estimated payment amount as of March 31, 2020, which was included in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We, along with equipment manufacturers and other carriers, are subject to current and potential future lawsuits alleging adverse health effects arising from the use of wireless handsets or from wireless transmission equipment such as cell towers. In addition, the FCC has from time to time gathered data regarding wireless device emissions, and its assessment of the risks associated with using wireless devices may evolve based on its findings. Any of these allegations or changes in risk assessments could result in customers purchasing fewer devices and wireless services, could result in significant legal and regulatory liability, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
The assessment of the outcome of legal proceedings, including our potential liability, if any, is a highly subjective process that requires judgments about future events that are not within our control. The amounts ultimately received or paid upon settlement or pursuant to final judgment, order or decree may differ materially from amounts accrued in our financial statements. In addition, litigation or similar proceedings could impose restraints on our current or future manner of doing business. Such potential outcomes including judgments, awards, settlements or orders could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
We offer highly regulated financial services products. These products expose us to a wide variety of state and federal regulations.
The financing of devices, such as through our EIP, and JUMP! On Demand or other leasing programs, such as those acquired in the Merger, has expanded our regulatory compliance obligations. Failure to remain compliant with applicable regulations may increase our risk exposure in the following areas:
•consumer complaints and potential examinations or enforcement actions by federal and state regulatory agencies, including, but not limited to, the Consumer Financial Protection Board,Bureau, state attorneys general, the FCC and the FTC; and
•regulatory fines, penalties, enforcement actions, civil litigation, and/or class action lawsuits.
Failure to comply with applicable regulations and the realization of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
We may not be able to adequately protect the intellectual property rights on which our business depends or may be accused of infringing intellectual property rights of third parties.
We rely on a combination of patent, service mark, trademark, and trade secret laws and contractual restrictions to establish and protect our proprietary rights, all of which offer only limited protection. The steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not prevent the misappropriation of our proprietary rights. We may not have the ability in certain jurisdictions to adequately protect intellectual property rights. Moreover, others may independently develop processes and technologies that are competitive to ours. Also, we may not be able to discover or determine the extent of any unauthorized use of our proprietary rights. Unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights may increase the cost of protecting these rights or reduce our revenues. We cannot be sure that any legal actions against such infringers will be successful, even when our rights have been infringed. We cannot assure you that our pending or future patent applications will be granted or enforceable, or that the rights granted under any patent that may be issued will provide us with any competitive advantages. In addition, we cannot assure you that any trademark or service mark registrations will be issued with respect to pending or future applications or will provide adequate protection of our brands. We do not have insurance coverage for intellectual property losses, and as such, a charge for an anticipated settlement or an adverse ruling awarding damages represents an unplanned loss event. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results.
Third parties may claim we infringe their intellectual property rights. We are a defendant in numerous intellectual property lawsuits, including patent infringement lawsuits, which exposes us to the risk of adverse financial impact either by way of significant settlement amounts or damage awards. As we adopt new technologies and new business systems, and provide customers with new products and/or services, we may face additional infringement claims. These claims could require us to cease certain activities or to cease selling relevant products and services. These claims can be time-consuming and costly to defend, and divert management resources, and expose us to significant damages awards or settlements, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition. In addition to litigation directly involving our Company, our vendors and suppliers can be threatened with patent litigation and/or subjected to the threat of disruption or blockage of sale, use, or importation of products, posing the risk of supply chain interruption to particular products and associated services which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our business may be impacted by new or changingamended tax laws or regulations or administrative interpretations and actions by federal, state, and/judicial decisions affecting the scope or local agencies,application of tax laws or how judicial authorities apply tax laws.regulations.
In connection with the products and services we sell, we calculate, collect, and remit various federal, state, and local taxes, surchargesfees and regulatory feescharges (“tax” or “taxes”) to numerous federal, state and local governmental authorities, including federal and state USF contributions and common carrier regulatory charges and public safety fees. In addition, we incur and pay state and local transaction taxes and fees on purchases of goods and services used in our business.
Tax laws are dynamic and subject to change as new laws are passed and new interpretations of the law are issued or applied. In many cases, the application of existing, newly enacted or amended tax laws (including(such as the recently enactedCoronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020 or the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 in the United States) is2017) may be uncertain and subject to differingdifferent interpretations, especially when evaluated against new technologies and telecommunications services, such as broadband internet access and cloud related services. Changesservices and in the context of our recent merger with Sprint. Legislative changes, administrative interpretations and judicial decisions affecting the scope or application of tax laws could also impact revenue reported and taxes due on tax inclusive plans.
In the event that we haveT-Mobile, including pre-acquisition Sprint, has incorrectly described, disclosed, determined, calculated, assessed, or remitted amounts that were due to governmental authorities, we could be subject to additional taxes, fines, penalties, or other adverse actions, which could materially impact our business, financial condition and operating results. In the event that federal, state, and/or local municipalities were to significantly increase taxes and regulatory or public safety charges on our network, operations, or services, or seek to impose new taxes or charges, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our wireless licenses are subject to renewal and may be revoked in the event that we violate applicable laws.
Our existing wireless licenses are subject to renewal upon the expiration of the 10-year or 15-year period for which they are granted. Historically,Our licenses have been granted with an expectation of renewal and the FCC has approved our license renewal applications. However, the Communications Act provides that licenses may be revoked for cause and license renewal applications denied if the FCC determines that a renewal would not serve the public interest. In addition, our licenses are subject to our compliance with the terms set forth in the agreement
pertaining to national security among Deutsche Telekom, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security and the Company. The failure of Deutsche Telekom or the Company to comply with the terms of this agreement could result in fines, injunctions and other penalties, including potential revocation or non-renewal of our spectrum licenses. If we fail to timely file to renew any wireless license or fail to meet any regulatory requirements for renewal, including construction and substantial service requirements, we could be denied a license renewal. Many of our wireless licenses are subject to interim or final construction requirements and there is no guarantee that the FCC will find our construction, or the construction of prior licensees, sufficient to meet the build-out or renewal requirements. The FCC has pending a rulemaking proceeding to reevaluate, among other things, its wireless license renewal showings and standards and may in this or other proceedings promulgate changes or additional substantial requirements or conditions to its renewal rules, including revising license build-out requirements. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the FCC will renew our wireless licenses upon their expiration. If any of our wireless licenses were to be revoked or not renewed upon expiration, we would not be permitted to provide services under that license, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our business could be adversely affected by findings of product liability for health/safety risks from wireless devices and transmission equipment, as well as by changes to regulations/radio frequency emission standards.
We do not manufacture the devices or other equipment that we sell, and we depend on our suppliers to provide defect-free and safe equipment. Suppliers are required by applicable law to manufacture their devices to meet certain governmentally imposed safety criteria. However, even if the devices we sell meet the regulatory safety criteria, we could be held liable with the equipment manufacturers and suppliers for any harm caused by products we sell if such products are later found to have design or manufacturing defects. We generally seek to enter into indemnification agreements with the manufacturers who supply us with devices to protect us from losses associated with product liability, but we cannot guarantee that we will be fully protected against all losses associated with a product that is found to be defective.
Allegations have been made that the use of wireless handsets and wireless transmission equipment, such as cell towers, may be linked to various health concerns, including cancer and brain tumors. Lawsuits have been filed against manufacturers and carriers in the industry claiming damages for alleged health problems arising from the use of wireless handsets. In addition, the FCC has from time to time gathered data regarding wireless handset emissions and its assessment of this issue may evolve based on its findings. The media has also reported incidents of handset battery malfunction, including reports of batteries that have overheated. These allegations may lead to changes in regulatory standards. There have also been other allegations regarding wireless technology, including allegations that wireless handset emissions may interfere with various electronic medical devices (including hearing aids and pacemakers), airbags and anti-lock brakes. Defects in the products of our suppliers, such as the 2016 recall by a handset Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) on one of its smartphone devices, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Additionally, there are safety risks associated with the use of wireless devices while operating vehicles or equipment. Concerns over any of these risks and the effect of any legislation, rules or regulations that have been and may be adopted in response to these risks could limit our ability to sell our wireless services.
Risks Related to Ownership of ourOur Common Stock
We are controlled by Deutsche Telekom, whoseEach of DT, which controls a majority of the voting power of our common stock, and SoftBank, a significant stockholder of T-Mobile, may have interests maythat differ from the interests of our other stockholders.
Deutsche Telekom beneficially owns and possesses majority voting powerUpon the completion of the fully dilutedTransactions, DT and SoftBank entered into the SoftBank Proxy Agreement, and on June 22, 2020, DT, Claure Mobile LLC (“CM LLC”), and Marcelo Claure entered into a Proxy, Lock-up and ROFR Agreement (“the Claure Proxy Agreement,” together with the SoftBank Proxy Agreement, the “Proxy Agreements”). Pursuant to the Proxy Agreements, at any meeting of our stockholders, the shares of our common stock.stock beneficially owned by SoftBank or CM LLC will be voted in the manner as directed by DT.
Through its controlAccordingly, DT controls a majority of the voting power of our common stock and the rights granted to Deutsche Telekom in our certificate of incorporation and the Stockholder’s Agreement, Deutsche Telekom controls the election of our directors and all other matters requiring the approval of our stockholders. By virtue of Deutsche Telekom’s voting control,therefore we are a “controlled company,” as defined in theThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) listing rules, and we are not subject to NASDAQ requirements that would otherwise require us to have a majority of independent directors, a nominating committee composed solely of independent directors or a compensation committee composed solely of independent directors. Accordingly, our stockholders will not be afforded the same protections generally as stockholders of other NASDAQ-listed companies with respect to corporate governance for so long as we rely on these exemptions from the corporate governance requirements.
In addition, pursuant to our certificateFifth Amended and Restated Certificate of incorporationIncorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”) and the Stockholder’sSecond Amended and Restated Stockholders’ Agreement, restrict us from taking certain actions without Deutsche Telekom’s prior written consent as long as Deutsche TelekomDT beneficially owns 30% or more of our outstanding common stock, we are restricted from taking certain actions without DT’s prior written consent, including (i) incurring indebtedness above certain levels based on a specified debt to cash flow ratio, (ii) taking any action that would cause a default under any instrument evidencing indebtedness involving DT or its affiliates, (iii) acquiring or disposing of assets or entering into mergers or similar acquisitions in excess of $1.0 billion, (iv) changing the outstandingsize of our board of directors, (v) subject to certain exceptions, issuing equity of 10% or more of the then-outstanding shares of our common stock, including:
the incurrence of debt (excluding certain permitted debt) if our consolidated ratio of debtor issuing equity to cash flow, as defined in the indenture dated April 28, 2013, for the most recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which financial statements are available would exceed 5.25 to 1.0 on a pro forma basis;
the acquisition of any business, debt or equity interests, operations or assets of any person for consideration in excess of $1.0 billion;
the sale of any of our or our subsidiaries’ divisions, businesses, operations or equity interests for consideration in excess of $1.0 billion;
the incurrence of secured debt (excluding certain permitted secured debt);
any change in the size of our Board of Directors;
the issuances of equity securities in excess of 10% of our outstanding shares or to repurchaseredeem debt held by Deutsche Telekom;
the repurchaseDT, (vi) repurchasing or redemption ofredeeming equity securities or the declaration ofmaking any extraordinary or in-kind dividends or distributionsdividend other than on a pro rata basis;basis, or (vii) making certain changes involving our CEO. We are also restricted from amending our Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws in any manner that could adversely affect DT’s rights under the Second Amended and
Restated Stockholders’ Agreement for as long as DT beneficially owns 5% or hiringmore of our chief executive officer.
outstanding common stock. These restrictions could prevent us from taking actions that our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors may otherwise determine are in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders or that may be in the best interests of our other stockholders.
Deutsche TelekomDT effectively has control over all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election or removal of directors, changes to our certificateCertificate of incorporation,Incorporation, a sale or merger of our Company and other transactions requiring stockholder approval under Delaware law. Deutsche Telekom’sDT’s controlling interest may have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or discouraging a third party from seeking to acquire, the Company. Deutsche TelekomDT and SoftBank, as significant stockholders, may have strategic, financial, or other interests different from our other stockholders, including as the holder of a substantial amount of our indebtedness and as the counter-partycounterparty in a number of commercial arrangements, and may make decisions adverse to the interests of our other stockholders.
In addition, we license certain trademarks from Deutsche Telekom,DT, including the right to use the trademark “T-Mobile” as a name for the Company and our flagship brand, under a trademark license agreement, between Deutsche Telekom and the Company.as amended, with DT. As described in more detail in our proxy statementProxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on April 21, 2020 under the heading “Transactions with Related Persons and Approval”,Approval,” we are obligated under the trademark license to pay Deutsche TelekomDT a royalty in an amount equal to 0.25%, which we refer to as the royalty rate, (the “royalty rate”) of the net revenue (as defined in the trademark license) generated by products and services sold by the Company under the licensed trademarks. However, the license agreement includestrademarks subject to a royalty rate adjustment mechanism that will occur in early 2018cap of $80.0 million per calendar year through December 31, 2028. We and potentially result inDT are obligated to negotiate a new royalty rate effective in January 2019. We also havetrademark license when (i) DT has 50% or less of the rightvoting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company or (ii) any third party owns or controls, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of the voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company, or otherwise has the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the Company. If we and DT fail to agree on a new trademark license, either we or DT may terminate the trademark license upon one year’s prior notice. Anand such termination shall be effective, in the case of clause (i) above, on the third anniversary after notice of termination and, in the case of clause (ii) above, on the second anniversary after notice of termination. A further increase in the royalty rate or termination of the trademark license could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
Future sales or issuances of our common stock including sales by Deutsche Telekom,DT and SoftBank and foreign ownership limitations by the FCC could have a negative impact on our stock price.price and decrease the value of our stock.
We cannot predict the effect, if any, that market sales of shares or the availability of shares of our common stock by DT or SoftBank will have on the prevailing trading price of our common stock from time to time.stock. Sales or issuances of a substantial number of shares of our common stock could cause our stock price to decline and could result in dilution of your shares.decline.
We, DT and Deutsche TelekomSoftBank are parties to the Stockholder’sSecond Amended and Restated Stockholders’ Agreement pursuant to which Deutsche Telekom isDT and SoftBank are free to transfer itstheir shares in public sales without notice, as long as such transactions would not result in the transfereea third party owning more than 30% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock. If a transfer would exceed the 30% threshold, it is prohibited unless the transfer is approved by our board of directors or the transferee makes a binding offer to purchase all of the other outstanding shares on the same price and terms. The Stockholder’sSecond Amended and Restated Stockholders’ Agreement does not otherwise impose any other restrictions on the sales of common stock by Deutsche Telekom.DT or SoftBank. Moreover, we have filedmay be required to file a shelf registration statement with respect to the common stock and certain debt securities of ours held by Deutsche Telekom,DT and SoftBank, which would facilitate the resale by Deutsche TelekomDT or SoftBank of all or any portion of thesuch shares of our common stock it holds.or debt securities they hold. The sale of shares of our common stock by Deutsche TelekomDT or SoftBank (other than in transactions involving the purchase of all of our outstanding shares) could significantly increase the number of shares available in the market, which could cause a decrease
in our stock price. In addition, even if Deutsche TelekomDT or SoftBank does not sell a large number of itstheir shares into the market, itstheir right to transfer a large number of shares into the market may depress our stock price.
Furthermore, under existing law, no more than 20% of an FCC licensee’s capital stock may be directly owned, or no more than 25% indirectly owned, or voted by non-U.S. citizens or their representatives, by a foreign government or its representatives or by a foreign corporation. If an FCC licensee is controlled by another entity, up to 25% of that entity’s capital stock may be owned or voted by non-U.S. citizens or their representatives, by a foreign government or its representatives or by a foreign corporation. Foreign ownership above the 25% holding company level may be allowed if the FCC finds such higher levels consistent with the public interest. The FCC has ruled that higher levels of foreign ownership, even up to 100%, are presumptively consistent with the public interest with respect to investors from certain nations. If our foreign ownership by previously unapproved foreign parties were to exceed the permitted level, the FCC could subject us to a range of penalties, including an order for us to divest the foreign ownership in part, fines, license revocation or denials of license renewals. If ownership of our common stock by an unapproved foreign entity were to become subject to such limitations, or if any
ownership of our common stock violates any other rule or regulation of the FCC applicable to us, our Certificate of Incorporation provides for certain redemption provisions at a pre-determined price which may be less than fair market value. These limitations and our Certificate of Incorporation may limit our ability to attract additional equity financing outside the United States and decrease the value of our common stock.
Our stock price may be volatile and may fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with our business, financial condition and operating results.
The trading prices of the securities of communications companies historically have been highly volatile, and the trading price of our common stock may be subject to wide fluctuations. Our stock price may fluctuate in reaction to a number of events and factors that may include, among other things:
•adverse economic, political or market conditions in the U.S. and international markets, including those caused by the Pandemic;
•our or our competitors’ actual or anticipated operating and financial results;
•introduction of new products and services by us or our competitors or changes in service plans or pricing by us or our competitors;
•analyst projections, predictions and forecasts, analyst target prices for our securities and changes in, or our failure to meet, securities analysts’ expectations;
transaction•realization of the expected benefits and synergies of the Transactions, or market or analyst expectations with respect thereto;
•transactions in our common stock by major investors;
•share repurchases by us or purchases by Deutsche Telekom;DT or SoftBank;
Deutsche Telekom’s•the potential issuance to SoftBank of the SoftBank Specified Shares Amount, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Letter Agreement (see Note 2 - Business Combination of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information);•DT’s financial performance and results of operation,operations, or actions implied or taken by Deutsche Telekom;DT or SoftBank;
•entry of new competitors into our markets or perceptions of increased price competition, including a price war;
•our performance, including subscribercustomer growth, and our financial and operational metric performance;
•market perceptions relating to our services, network, handsets, and deployment of our LTE platformand 5G platforms and our access to iconic handsets, services, applications, or content;
•market perceptions of the wireless communications services industry and valuation models for us and the industry;
•conditions or trends in the Internet and the industry sectors in which we operate in;operate;
•changes in our credit rating or future prospects;
•changes in interest rates;
•changes in our capital structure, including issuance of additional debt or equity to the public;
•the availability or perceived availability of additional capital in general and our access to such capital;
•actual or anticipated consolidation or other strategic mergers or acquisition activities involving us or our competitors, or other participants in related or adjacent industries, or market speculationsspeculation regarding such activities;
•disruptions of our operations or the operations of service providers or other vendors necessary to our network operations; and
the general state of the U.S. and world politics and economies; and
•availability of additional spectrum, whether by the announcement, commencement, bidding and closing of auctions for new spectrum or the acquisition of companies that own spectrum, and the extent to which we or our competitors succeed in acquiring additional spectrum.
In addition, the stock market has been volatile in the recent past and has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations in the past, which may continue for the foreseeable future. This volatility hasSevere market fluctuations, such as those experienced recently with regard to the Pandemic, oil and other commodity prices, concerns over sovereign debt risk, trade policies and tariffs affecting other countries, and those that may arise from global and political tensions or weak economic conditions, have had and may continue to have a significant impact on the trading price of securities issued by many companies, including companies in the communications industry. These changes frequently occur irrespective of the operating performance of the affected companies. Hence, the trading price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with our business, financial condition and operating results.
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our credit facilities and the indentures and supplemental indentures governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to use future earnings, if any, to invest in our business and to fundfor general corporate purposes, including the integration of T-Mobile’s and Sprint’s businesses and the continued build-out of our existing5G network. Therefore, we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock repurchase program.
Our previously announced stock repurchase program,in the foreseeable future, and capital appreciation, if any, subsequent stock purchase program put in place from time to time, could affect the price of our common stock increasewill be the volatilitysole source of potential gain.
Risks Related to Integration
Although we expect that the Transactions will result in synergies and other benefits, those synergies and benefits may not be realized in the amounts anticipated, or may not be realized within the expected time frame, and risks associated with the foregoing may also result from the extended delay in the integration of the companies.
Our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the Transactions will depend, to a large extent, on our ability to integrate our and Sprint’s businesses in a manner that facilitates growth opportunities and achieves the projected cost savings. In addition, some of the anticipated synergies are not expected to occur for a significant time period following the completion of the Transactions and will require substantial capital expenditures in the near term.
As a result of the delays experienced in the completion of the Transactions and the Pandemic, our anticipated synergies and other benefits of the Transactions may be reduced or eliminated, including a delay in the integration of, or inability to integrate, the networks of T-Mobile and Sprint. Even if we are able to integrate the two companies successfully, the anticipated benefits of the Transactions, including the expected synergies and network benefits, may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected.
We have incurred substantial expenses as a result of completing the Transactions. We expect to incur substantial additional expenses in connection with integrating T-Mobile’s and Sprint’s businesses, operations, policies and procedures and compliance with the Government Commitments. While we have assumed that a certain level of transaction-related expenses will be incurred, factors beyond our control could affect the total amount or the timing of these expenses. Many of the expenses that will be incurred, by their nature, are difficult to estimate accurately. These expenses could exceed the costs historically borne by us and offset the expected synergies.
Our business and Sprint’s business may not be integrated successfully or such integration may be more difficult, time consuming or costly than expected. Operating costs, customer loss and business disruption, including maintaining relationships with employees, customers, suppliers or vendors, may be greater than expected.
The combination of two independent businesses is complex, costly and time-consuming, and may divert significant management attention and resources. This process may disrupt our business or otherwise impact our ability to compete. The overall combination of our common stock and could diminish our cash reserves. Such repurchase programSprint’s businesses may be suspended or terminated at any time, whichalso result in material unanticipated problems, expenses, liabilities, competitive responses and impacts, and loss of customers and other business relationships. The difficulties of combining the operations of the companies include, among others:
•diversion of management attention to integration matters;
•difficulties in integrating operations and systems, including intellectual property and communications systems, administrative and information technology infrastructure, and supplier and vendor arrangements;
•challenges in conforming standards, controls, procedures and accounting and other policies;
•alignment of key performance measurements may result in a decreasegreater need to communicate and manage clear expectations while we work to integrate and align policies and practices;
•difficulties in integrating employees;
•the transition of management to the combined company management team, and the need to address possible differences in corporate cultures, management philosophies, and compensation structures;
•challenges in retaining existing customers and obtaining new customers;
•difficulties in managing the expanded operations of a significantly larger and more complex company;
•possible delays, disputes, or regulatory issues in connection with the finalizing and consummation of an asset purchase agreement between Sprint PCS and Shentel for all of Shentel’s wireless assets and customers, and any associated adverse effects on the operations and business in the trading priceShentel service area;
•compliance with Government Commitments relating to national security;
•known or potential unknown liabilities of Sprint that are larger than expected;
•other potential adverse consequences and unforeseen increased expenses or liabilities associated with the Transactions.
Additionally, uncertainties over the integration process could cause customers, suppliers, distributors, dealers, retailers and others to seek to change or cancel our existing business relationships or to refuse to renew existing relationships. Suppliers, distributors and content and application providers may also delay or cease developing new products for us that are necessary for the operations of our common stock.business due to uncertainties. Competitors may also target our existing customers by highlighting potential uncertainties and integration difficulties.
Some of these factors are outside our control, and any one of them could result in lower revenues, higher costs and diversion of management time and energy, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, even if the integration is successful, the full benefits of the Transactions including, among others, the synergies, cost savings or sales or growth opportunities may not be realized. As a result, it cannot be assured that we will realize the full benefits expected from the Transactions within the anticipated time frames or at all.
In connection with the Merger, we are evaluating the long-term billing system architecture strategy for our customers. Our long-term strategy is to migrate Sprint’s legacy customers onto T-Mobile’s existing billing platforms. We will operate and maintain multiple billing systems until such migration is completed. Any unanticipated difficulties, disruption, or significant delays could have adverse operational, financial, and reputational effects on our business.
Following the closing of the Merger, we are operating and maintaining multiple billing systems. We expect to continue to do so until successful migration of Sprint’s legacy customers to T-Mobile’s existing billing platforms. We may
have in place from time to time, a stock repurchase program. Any such stock repurchase program adopted will not obligate the Company to repurchase any dollar amountencounter unanticipated difficulties or
number of shares of common stock and may be suspended or discontinued at any time, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased under any such stock repurchase program depends on a variety of factors including the timing of open trading windows, the price of our common stock, corporate and regulatory requirements and other market conditions. We may effect repurchases under any stock repurchase program from time to timeexperience delays in the
open market, in privately negotiated transactionsongoing integration efforts with respect to billing, causing major system or
otherwise, including accelerated stock repurchase arrangements. Repurchases pursuant to any such stock repurchase programbusiness disruptions. In addition, we or our supporting vendors may experience errors, cyber-attacks or other operational disruptions that could
affect our stock pricenegatively impact us and
increase its volatility. The existence of a stock repurchase program could also cause our stock price to be higher than it would be in the absence of such a program and could potentially reduce the market liquidity for our stock. There can be no assurance that any stock repurchases will enhance stockholder value because the market price of our common stock may decline below the levels atover which we
repurchased sharesmay have limited control. Interruptions and/or failure of
common stock. Althoughthese billing systems could disrupt our
stock repurchase program is intended to enhance stockholder value, short-term stock price fluctuations could reduce the program’s effectiveness. Additionally, our share repurchase program could diminish our cash reserves, which mayoperations and impact our ability to
finance future growthprovide or bill for our services, retain customers, attract new customers or negatively impact overall customer experience. Any occurrence of the foregoing could cause material adverse effects on our operations and
to pursue possible future strategic opportunitiesfinancial condition, and/or material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and
acquisitions. See Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities and Note 10 - Repurchases of Common Stock included in Part II of this Form 10-K for further information.reputational damage.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
As of December 31, 2017,2020, our significant properties that we primarily leasedown, lease and were useduse in connection with switching centers, data centers, call centers and warehouses were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Approximate Number | | Approximate Size in Square Feet |
| Switching centers | 184 | | | 11,000,000 | |
| Data centers | 10 | | | 1,800,000 | |
| Call center | 25 | | | 1,800,000 | |
| Warehouses | 63 | | | 1,500,000 | |
|
| | | | | |
| | Approximate Number | | Approximate Size in Square Feet |
| Switching centers | 61 |
| | 1,300,000 |
|
| Data centers | 6 |
| | 500,000 |
|
| Call center | 17 |
| | 1,400,000 |
|
| Warehouses | 15 |
| | 500,000 |
|
Through the Merger, we acquired leases of real property, including cell sites, switch sites, dark fiber, retail stores and office facilities.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we primarilyowned and leased:
•Approximately 61,000108,000 macro sitestowers and approximately 18,00069,000 distributed antenna system and small cell sites.sites;
•Approximately 2,2003,400 T-Mobile and MetroPCSMetro by T-Mobile retail locations, including stores and kiosks ranging in size from approximately 100 square feet to 17,000 square feet.feet;
•Office space totaling approximately 900,0001.3 million square feet for our corporate headquartersoffices located in Bellevue, Washington. We use these offices for engineering and administrative purposes.purposes;
•Office space totaling approximately 2.0 million square feet for our corporate offices located in Overland Park, Kansas and Frisco, Texas. We use these offices for administrative purposes; and
•Office space throughout the U.S., totaling approximately 1,700,0003.0 million square feet, as of December 31, 2017, for use by our regional offices primarily for administrative, engineering and sales purposes.
In February 2018, we extended the leases related to our corporate headquarters facility.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
PART II.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “TMUS.” We are included within the S&P 500 in the Wireless Telecommunication Services GICS (Global Industry Classification Standard) Sub-Industry index. As of DecemberJanuary 31, 2017,2021, there were 26916,299 registered stockholders of record of our common stock, but we estimate the total number of stockholders to be much higher as a number of our shares are held by brokers or dealers for their customers in street name.
The high and low common stock sales prices per share were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | High | | Low |
| Year Ended December 31, 2017 | | | |
| First quarter | $ | 65.41 |
| | $ | 55.30 |
|
| Second quarter | 68.88 |
| | 59.59 |
|
| Third quarter | 65.47 |
| | 59.13 |
|
| Fourth quarter | 64.64 |
| | 54.60 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2016 | | | |
| First quarter | $ | 41.23 |
| | $ | 33.23 |
|
| Second quarter | 44.13 |
| | 37.93 |
|
| Third quarter | 48.11 |
| | 42.71 |
|
| Fourth quarter | 59.19 |
| | 44.91 |
|
Dividends
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our credit facilities and the indentures and supplemental indentures governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties excluding capital leases, contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common stock. In addition, no dividend may be declared or paid on our common stock, other than dividends payable solely in shares of our common stock, unless all accrued dividends for all completed dividend periods have been declared and paid on our preferred stock. As of December 15, 2017, 20 million shares of our preferred stock converted to approximately 32 million shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of 1.6119 common shares for each share of previously outstanding preferred stock and certain cash-in-lieu of fractional shares. There are no preferred shares outstanding as of December 31, 2017. We currently intend to use future earnings, if any, to invest in our business and to fund our existing stock repurchase program. Subject to Delaware law, our Boardfor general corporate purposes, including the integration of Directors will determine the payment of futureT-Mobile’s and Sprint’s businesses. Therefore, we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, and capital appreciation, if any, and the amount of any dividends in light of:
any applicable contractual or charter restrictions limiting our ability to pay dividends;
our earnings and cash flows;
our capital requirements;
our future needs for cash;
our financial condition; and
other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant.
Repurchases of Common Stock
On December 6, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $1.5 billion of our common stock through December 31, 2018. Underwill be the repurchase program, repurchases can be made from time to time using a varietysole source of methods, which may include open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, all in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and other applicable legal requirements. The specific timing, price and size of purchases will depend on prevailing stock prices, general economic and market conditions, and other considerations. The repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and the repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time at our discretion. Repurchased shares are retired.potential gain.
We also understand that Deutsche Telekom AG, our majority stockholder, or its affiliates, is considering plans to purchase additional shares of our common stock. Such purchases would likely take place through December 31, 2018, all in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and other applicable legal requirements.
The following table summarizes information regarding shares repurchased during the quarter ended December 31, 2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total Number of Shares Repurchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Repurchase Plans or Programs | | Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (in millions) |
| 10/1/2017 - 10/31/2017 | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| 11/1/2017 - 11/30/2017 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| 12/1/2017 - 12/31/2017 | 7,010,889 |
| | 63.34 |
| | 7,010,889 |
| | 1,056 |
|
| | 7,010,889 |
| | | | 7,010,889 |
| | 1,056 |
|
From the inception of the repurchase program through February 5, 2018, we repurchased approximately 12.3 million shares at an average price per share of $63.68 for a total purchase price of approximately $783 million. As of February 5, 2018, there was approximately $717 million of repurchase authority remaining.
Performance Graph
The graph below compares the five-year cumulative total returns of T-Mobile, the S&P 500 index, the NASDAQ Composite index and the Dow Jones US Mobile Telecommunications TSM index. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment, with the reinvestment of all dividends, from December 31, 20122015 to December 31, 2017. For periods prior to2020.
The five-year cumulative total returns of T-Mobile, the closing ofS&P 500 index, the business combination with MetroPCS, our stock price performance representsNASDAQ Composite index and the stock price of MetroPCS, adjusted to reflectDow Jones US Mobile Telecommunications TSM index, as illustrated in the 1-for-2 reverse stock split effected on April 30, 2013.graph above, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| At December 31, |
| 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 |
| T-Mobile US, Inc. | $ | 100.00 | | | $ | 147.01 | | | $ | 162.35 | | | $ | 162.60 | | | $ | 200.46 | | | $ | 344.71 | |
| S&P 500 | 100.00 | | | 111.96 | | | 136.40 | | | 130.42 | | | 171.49 | | | 203.04 | |
| NASDAQ Composite | 100.00 | | | 108.87 | | | 141.13 | | | 137.12 | | | 187.44 | | | 271.64 | |
| Dow Jones US Mobile Telecommunications TSM | 100.00 | | | 127.44 | | | 130.32 | | | 155.09 | | | 175.87 | | | 191.76 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | At December 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 |
| T-Mobile US, Inc. | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 210.69 |
| | $ | 168.73 |
| | $ | 245.01 |
| | $ | 360.19 |
| | $ | 397.77 |
|
| S&P 500 | 100.00 |
| | 132.39 |
| | 150.51 |
| | 152.59 |
| | 170.84 |
| | 208.14 |
|
| NASDAQ Composite | 100.00 |
| | 141.63 |
| | 162.09 |
| | 173.33 |
| | 187.19 |
| | 242.29 |
|
| Dow Jones US Mobile Telecommunications TSM | 100.00 |
| | 132.12 |
| | 118.02 |
| | 123.77 |
| | 157.74 |
| | 161.29 |
|
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Selected Financial Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except per share and customer amounts) | As of and for the Year Ended December 31, |
2020 (1) | | 2019 (2) | | 2018 (3) | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Statement of Operations Data | | | | | | | | | |
| Total service revenues | $ | 50,395 | | | $ | 34,500 | | | $ | 32,441 | | | $ | 30,525 | | | $ | 28,085 | |
| Total revenues | 68,397 | | | 44,998 | | | 43,310 | | | 40,604 | | | 37,490 | |
| Operating income | 6,636 | | | 5,722 | | | 5,309 | | | 4,888 | | | 4,050 | |
| Total other expense, net | (3,106) | | | (1,119) | | | (1,392) | | | (1,727) | | | (1,723) | |
Income tax (expense) benefit (4) | (786) | | | (1,135) | | | (1,029) | | | 1,375 | | | (867) | |
| Income from continuing operations | 2,744 | | | 3,468 | | | 2,888 | | | 4,536 | | | 1,460 | |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax (6) | 320 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Net income | 3,064 | | | 3,468 | | | 2,888 | | | 4,536 | | | 1,460 | |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | 3,064 | | | 3,468 | | | 2,888 | | | 4,481 | | | 1,405 | |
| Earnings per share | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | 2.40 | | | $ | 4.06 | | | $ | 3.40 | | | $ | 5.39 | | | $ | 1.71 | |
Discontinued operations (6) | 0.28 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Basic | $ | 2.68 | | | $ | 4.06 | | | $ | 3.40 | | | $ | 5.39 | | | $ | 1.71 | |
| Continuing operations | $ | 2.37 | | | $ | 4.02 | | | $ | 3.36 | | | $ | 5.20 | | | $ | 1.69 | |
Discontinued operations (6) | 0.28 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Diluted | $ | 2.65 | | | $ | 4.02 | | | $ | 3.36 | | | $ | 5.20 | | | $ | 1.69 | |
| Balance Sheet Data | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 10,385 | | | $ | 1,528 | | | $ | 1,203 | | | $ | 1,219 | | | $ | 5,500 | |
Property and equipment, net (2) | 41,175 | | | 21,984 | | | 23,359 | | | 22,196 | | | 20,943 | |
| Spectrum licenses | 82,828 | | | 36,465 | | | 35,559 | | | 35,366 | | | 27,014 | |
Total assets (2) | 200,162 | | | 86,921 | | | 72,468 | | | 70,563 | | | 65,891 | |
Total debt and financing lease liabilities, excluding tower obligations (2) | 73,632 | | | 27,272 | | | 27,547 | | | 28,319 | | | 27,786 | |
| Stockholders' equity | 65,344 | | | 28,789 | | | 24,718 | | | 22,559 | | | 18,236 | |
| Statement of Cash Flows and Operational Data | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities (5) | $ | 8,640 | | | $ | 6,824 | | | $ | 3,899 | | | $ | 3,831 | | | $ | 2,779 | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | (11,034) | | | (6,391) | | | (5,541) | | | (5,237) | | | (4,702) | |
| Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits | (1,333) | | | (967) | | | (127) | | | (5,828) | | | (3,968) | |
Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions (5) | 3,134 | | | 3,876 | | | 5,406 | | | 4,319 | | | 3,356 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (5) | 13,010 | | | (2,374) | | | (3,336) | | | (1,367) | | | 463 | |
| Total customers (in thousands) | 102,064 | | | 67,894 | | | 63,656 | | | 58,715 | | | 54,240 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(1)On April 1, 2020, we completed the Merger with Sprint. Our financial results include the consolidated operations of T-Mobile and Sprint subsequent to the date of Merger close.
(2)On January 1, 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” and all the related amendments (collectively, the “new lease standard”), using the modified retrospective method with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. Comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the standards in effect for those periods.
(3)On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” and all the related amendments (collectively, the “new revenue standard”), using the modified retrospective method with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. Comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the standards in effect for those periods.
(4)In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”) was signed into legislation. The TCJA included numerous changes to existing tax law, including a permanent reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The rate reduction took place on January 1, 2018. We recognized a net tax benefit of $2.2 billion associated with the enactment of the TCJA in Income tax expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income in the fourth quarter of 2017, primarily due to a re-measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
(5)On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (the “new cash flow standard”) which impacted the presentation of our cash flows related to our beneficial interests in securitization transactions, which is the deferred purchase price, resulting in a reclassification of cash inflows from Operating activities to Investing activities of approximately $4.3 billion and $3.4 billion for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The new cash flow standard also impacted the presentation of our cash payments for debt prepayment and debt extinguishment costs, resulting in a reclassification of cash outflows from Operating activities to Financing activities of $188 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. There were no cash payments for debt prepayment and debt extinguishment costs during the year ended December 31, 2016. We have applied the new cash flow standard retrospectively to all periods presented.
(6)In connection with obtaining regulatory approval for the Merger, on July 1, 2020, DISH acquired the prepaid wireless business operated under the Boost Mobile and Sprint prepaid brands (excluding the Assurance brand Lifeline customers and the prepaid wireless customers of Shentel and Swiftel Communications, Inc.), the results of which prior to the divestiture are presented in Income from discontinued operations, net of tax.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except per share and customer amounts) | As of and for the Year Ended December 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Statement of Operations Data | | | | | | | | | |
| Total service revenues | $ | 30,160 |
| | $ | 27,844 |
| | $ | 24,821 |
| | $ | 22,375 |
| | $ | 19,068 |
|
Total revenues (1) | 40,604 |
| | 37,490 |
| | 32,467 |
| | 29,920 |
| | 24,605 |
|
Operating income (1) | 4,888 |
| | 4,050 |
| | 2,479 |
| | 1,772 |
| | 1,181 |
|
Total other expense, net (1) | (1,727 | ) | | (1,723 | ) | | (1,501 | ) | | (1,359 | ) | | (1,130 | ) |
| Income tax benefit (expense) | 1,375 |
| | (867 | ) | | (245 | ) | | (166 | ) | | (16 | ) |
| Net income | 4,536 |
| | 1,460 |
| | 733 |
| | 247 |
| | 35 |
|
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | 4,481 |
| | 1,405 |
| | 678 |
| | 247 |
| | 35 |
|
| Earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 5.39 |
| | $ | 1.71 |
| | $ | 0.83 |
| | $ | 0.31 |
| | $ | 0.05 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 5.20 |
| | $ | 1.69 |
| | $ | 0.82 |
| | $ | 0.30 |
| | $ | 0.05 |
|
| Balance Sheet Data | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,219 |
| | $ | 5,500 |
| | $ | 4,582 |
| | $ | 5,315 |
| | $ | 5,891 |
|
| Property and equipment, net | 22,196 |
| | 20,943 |
| | 20,000 |
| | 16,245 |
| | 15,349 |
|
| Spectrum licenses | 35,366 |
| | 27,014 |
| | 23,955 |
| | 21,955 |
| | 18,122 |
|
| Total assets | 70,563 |
| | 65,891 |
| | 62,413 |
| | 56,639 |
| | 49,946 |
|
| Total debt, excluding tower obligations | 28,319 |
| | 27,786 |
| | 26,243 |
| | 21,946 |
| | 20,182 |
|
| Stockholders’ equity | 22,559 |
| | 18,236 |
| | 16,557 |
| | 15,663 |
| | 14,245 |
|
| Statement of Cash Flows and Operational Data | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 7,962 |
| | $ | 6,135 |
| | $ | 5,414 |
| | $ | 4,146 |
| | $ | 3,545 |
|
| Purchases of property and equipment | (5,237 | ) | | (4,702 | ) | | (4,724 | ) | | (4,317 | ) | | (4,025 | ) |
| Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits | (5,828 | ) | | (3,968 | ) | | (1,935 | ) | | (2,900 | ) | | (381 | ) |
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (1,179 | ) | | 463 |
| | 3,413 |
| | 2,524 |
| | 4,044 |
|
Total customers (in thousands)(2) | 72,585 |
| | 71,455 |
| | 63,282 |
| | 55,018 |
| | 46,684 |
|
| |
(1) | Effective January 1, 2017, we changed an accounting principle. The imputed discount on Equipment Installment Plan (“EIP”) receivables, which is amortized over the financed installment term using the effective interest method, and was previously presented within Interest income in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, is now presented within Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. We have applied this change retrospectively and presented the effect of $280 million, $248 million, $414 million, $356 million and $185 million on the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively in the table above. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
|
| |
(2) | We believe current and future regulatory changes have made the Lifeline program offered by our wholesale partners uneconomical. We will continue to support our wholesale partners offering the Lifeline program, but have excluded the Lifeline customers from our reported wholesale subscriber base resulting in the removal of 4,528,000 reported wholesale customers in 2017. |
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
The objectives of our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) are to provide users of our consolidated financial statements with the following:
•A narrative explanation from the perspective of management of our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect future results;
•Context to the financial statements; and
•Information that allows assessment of the likelihood that past performance is indicative of future performance.
Our MD&A is performed on a consolidated basis and is inclusive of the results and operations of Sprint prospectively from the close of our Merger on April 1, 2020. The Merger enhanced our spectrum portfolio, increased our customer base, altered our product mix by increasing the portion of customers who finance their devices with leasing programs and created opportunity for synergies in our operations. We anticipate an initial increase in our combined operating costs which we expect to decrease as we realize synergies. We expect the trends and results of operations of the combined company to be materially different than those of the standalone entities.
Our MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read together with, our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172020, included in Part II,II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Except as expressly stated, the financial condition and results of operations discussed throughout our MD&A are those of T-Mobile US, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
BusinessBeginning with the second quarter of 2020, we have discontinued the use of “Branded” to describe the results and metrics associated with our flagship brands including T-Mobile and Metro by T-Mobile.
Sprint Merger
Transaction Overview
ChangeOn April 1, 2020, we completed our Merger with Sprint, a communications company offering a comprehensive range of wireless and wireline communications products and services. As a result, Sprint and its subsidiaries became wholly owned consolidated subsidiaries of T-Mobile.
The Merger has altered the size and scope of our operations, impacting our assets, liabilities, obligations, capital requirements and performance measures. We expect the trends and results of operations of the combined company to be materially different than those of the standalone entities. As a combined company, we expect to be able to enhance the breadth and depth of our nationwide 5G network, accelerate innovation, increase competition in Accounting Principlethe U.S. wireless, video and broadband industries and achieve significant synergies and cost reductions by eliminating redundancies within the combined network as well as other business processes and operations.
Effective JanuaryFor more information regarding the Merger, see Note 2 – Business Combination of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
On June 22, 2020, we entered into a Master Framework Agreement and related transactions with SoftBank to facilitate the SoftBank Monetization as described in Note 14 - SoftBank Equity Transactionof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Brand and Retail Unification
On August 2, 2020, we combined the Sprint and T-Mobile operations under the T-Mobile brand nationwide. We combined our retail operations and rebranded thousands of Sprint stores to T-Mobile stores while implementing the tools and systems across our distribution footprint to serve all customers in all stores.
Sale of Boost Mobile and Sprint Prepaid Brands
In connection with obtaining regulatory approval for the Merger, on July 1, 2017,2020, DISH acquired the imputed discount on EIP receivables, whichprepaid wireless business operated under the Boost Mobile and Sprint prepaid brands (excluding the Assurance brand Lifeline customers and the prepaid wireless customers of Shentel and Swiftel Communications, Inc.), including customer accounts, inventory, contracts, intellectual property and certain other specified assets (the “Prepaid Business”), and assumed certain related liabilities (the “Prepaid Transaction”). For more information, see Note 12 - Discontinued Operationsof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Upon the closing of the Prepaid Transaction, we entered into a Master Network Services Agreement (the “MVNO Agreement”) providing for the provisioning of network services to customers of the Prepaid Business for a period of up to seven years following the closing of the Prepaid Transaction. The revenue generated through this agreement is amortized over the financed installment term using the effective interest method and was previously recognizedpresented within Interest incomeWholesale revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income is recognized within Other revenuesfollowing the close of the Prepaid Transaction on July 1, 2020.
We included the pre-tax results of our discontinued operations in our determination of Adjusted EBITDA, a Non-GAAP measure, to reflect contributions of the Prepaid Business that was replaced by the MVNO Agreement beginning on July 1, 2020. See “Adjusted EBITDA” in the “Performance Measures” section of this MD&A.
Merger-Related Costs
Merger-related costs generally include:
•Integration costs to achieve efficiencies in network, retail, information technology and back office operations;
•Restructuring costs, including severance, store rationalization and network decommissioning; and
•Transaction costs, including legal and professional services related to the completion of the Merger.
Transaction and restructuring costs are disclosed in Note 2 – Business Combination and Note 19 - Restructuring Costs, respectively. Merger-related costs have been excluded from our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, as we do not consider these costs to be reflective of our ongoing operating performance. See “Adjusted EBITDA” in the “Performance Measures” section of this MD&A. Cash payments for Merger-related costs, including payments related to our restructuring plan, are included in Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. We believe this presentation is preferable because it provides a better representation of amounts earned from the Company’s major ongoing operations and aligns with industry practice thereby enhancing comparability. We have applied this change retrospectively and the effect of this change forCash Flows.
Merger-related costs during the years ended December 31, 20162020, 2019 and 2015, was a reclassification of $248 million2018 are presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | 2020 Versus 2019 | | 2019 Versus 2018 |
| | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Merger-related costs | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | | $ | 646 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 646 | | | NM | | $ | — | | | NM |
| Cost of equipment sales | | | | | | | | | 6 | | | — | | | — | | | 6 | | | NM | | — | | | NM |
| Selling, general and administrative | | | | | | | | | 1,263 | | | 620 | | | 196 | | | 643 | | | 104 | % | | 424 | | | 216 | % |
| Total Merger-related costs | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,915 | | | $ | 620 | | | $ | 196 | | | $ | 1,295 | | | 209 | % | | $ | 424 | | | 216 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash payments for Merger-related costs | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,493 | | | $ | 442 | | | $ | 86 | | | $ | 1,051 | | | 238 | % | | $ | 356 | | | 414 | % |
NM - Not Meaningful
Merger-related costs will be impacted by restructuring and
$414 million, respectively,integration activities expected to occur over the next three years as we implement initiatives to realize cost efficiencies from
Interest incomethe Merger. Transaction costs, including legal and professional service fees related to
Other revenues. The amortization of imputed discount on our EIP receivables for the
year ended December 31, 2017 was $280 million. For additional information, see Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policiescompletion of the NotesMerger, are expected to decrease in periods subsequent to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
Un-carrier Strategy
The Un-carrier is about adding value to the customer relationship by changing the rulesclose of the industry and giving our customers more. We introduced our Un-carrier strategy in 2013 withMerger.
Restructuring
Upon the objectiveclose of eliminating customer pain pointsthe Merger, we began implementing restructuring initiatives to realize cost efficiencies from the unnecessary complexity of the wireless communication industry. Since that time, we have continued our efforts with the launch of additional initiatives of our Un-carrier strategy. During 2017, we launched the following Un-carrier initiatives:
In January 2017, we introduced, Un-carrier Next, where monthly wireless service fees and sales taxes are included in the advertised monthly recurring charge for T-Mobile ONE. We also unveiled Kickback on T-Mobile ONE, where participating customers who use 2 GB or less of data in a month, will get up to a $10 credit per qualifying line on their next month’s bill. In addition, we introduced the Un-contract for T-Mobile ONE with the first-ever price guarantee on an unlimited 4G LTE plan which allows current T-Mobile ONE customers to keep their price for service until they decide to change it.
In September 2017, we introduced, Un-carrier Next: Netflix On Us, through an exclusive new partnership with Netflix where qualifying T-Mobile ONE customers on family plans can opt in for a standard monthly Netflix service plan at no additional cost.
Our ability to acquire and retain branded customers is important to our business in the generation of revenues and we believe our Un-carrier strategy, along with ongoing network improvements, has been successful in attracting and retaining customers as evidenced by continued branded customer growth and improved branded postpaid phone and branded prepaid customer churn.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | 2017 Versus 2016 | | 2016 Versus 2015 |
| (in thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | # Change | | % Change | | # Change | | % Change |
| Net customer additions | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Branded postpaid customers | 3,620 |
| | 4,097 |
| | 4,510 |
| | (477 | ) | | (12 | )% | | (413 | ) | | (9 | )% |
| Branded prepaid customers | 855 |
| | 2,508 |
| | 1,315 |
| | (1,653 | ) | | (66 | )% | | 1,193 |
| | 91 | % |
| Total branded customers | 4,475 |
| | 6,605 |
| | 5,825 |
| | (2,130 | ) | | (32 | )% | | 780 |
| | 13 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | Bps Change 2017 Versus 2016 | | Bps Change 2016 Versus 2015 |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | |
| Branded postpaid phone churn | 1.18 | % | | 1.30 | % | | 1.39 | % | | -12 bps | | -9 bps |
| Branded prepaid churn | 4.04 | % | | 3.88 | % | | 4.45 | % | | 16 bps | | -57 bps |
On September 1, 2016, we sold our marketing and distribution rights to certain existing T-Mobile co-branded customers to a current MVNO partner for nominal consideration (the “MVNO Transaction”). Upon the sale, the MVNO Transaction resulted in a transfer of 1,365,000 branded postpaid phone customers and 326,000 branded prepaid customers to wholesale customers. Prospectively from September 1, 2016, revenue for these customers is recorded within wholesale revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Additionally, the impact of the MVNO Transaction resulted in improvements to branded postpaid phone churn for year ended December 31, 2016.
We believe current and future regulatory changes have made the Lifeline program offered by our wholesale partners uneconomical. We will continue to support our wholesale partners offering the Lifeline program, but have excluded the Lifeline customers from our reported wholesale subscriber base resulting in the removal of 4,528,000 reported wholesale customers in 2017.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, a handset OEM announced recalls on certain of its smartphone devices. As a result, in 2016 we recorded no revenueMerger. The major activities associated with the device salesrestructuring initiatives to customersdate include:
•Contract termination costs associated with rationalization of retail stores, distribution channels, duplicative network and impaired the devices to their net realizable value. The OEM agreed to reimburse T-Mobile for directbackhaul services and indirectother agreements;
•Severance costs associated with the recall,reduction of redundant processes and functions; and
•The decommissioning of certain small cell sites and distributed antenna systems to achieve synergies in network costs.
Anticipated Impacts
Our restructuring activities are expected to occur over the next three years with substantially all costs incurred by the end of fiscal year 2023. We are evaluating additional restructuring initiatives which are dependent on consultations and negotiation with certain counterparties and the expected impact on our business operations, which could affect the amount or timing of the restructuring costs and related payments. We expect our principal sources of funding to be sufficient to meet our liquidity requirements and anticipated payments associated with the restructuring initiatives.
As a result of our ongoing restructuring activities, we expect to realize cost efficiencies by eliminating redundancies within our combined network as such, we recorded an amount due from the OEMwell as an offsetother business processes and operations. We expect these activities to the loss recordedresult in a reduction of expenses withinCost of equipment salesservices and the costs incurred within Selling, general and administrative in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive IncomeIncome.
COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a widespread health crisis that has adversely affected businesses, economies, and financial markets worldwide, and has caused significant volatility in the U.S. and international debt and equity markets. The impact of the Pandemic has been wide-ranging, including, but not limited to, the temporary closures of many businesses and schools, “shelter in place” orders, travel restrictions, social distancing guidelines and other governmental, business and individual actions taken in response to the Pandemic. These restrictions have impacted, and will continue to impact, our business, including the demand for our products and services and the ways in which our customers purchase and use them. In addition, the Pandemic has resulted in economic uncertainty and a reductionsignificant increase in unemployment in the United States, which could affect our customers’ purchasing decisions and ability to Accounts payablemake timely payments. Throughout the year, the Pandemic has peaked, subsided and accrued liabilitiesseen a resurgence, leading to phased re-openings, as well as continuing or renewed containment measures.
As a critical communications infrastructure provider as designated by the government, our focus has been on providing crucial connectivity to our customers and impacted communities while ensuring the safety and well-being of our employees.
Our Response
We have taken a variety of steps to help mitigate the impact of the Pandemic on our customers and to protect the health and well-being of our workforce and communities:
To Protect and Support Our Employees and Communities
•Before the Merger, in mid-March, approximately 80% of T-Mobile and 70% of Sprint company-owned store locations, as well as many third-party retailer locations that sell our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The reimbursement was received fromT-Mobile, Metro by T-Mobile and Sprint brands were temporarily closed. In compliance with the OEMregulations of various states, we have since reopened substantially all of our previously closed stores.
•At the onset of the Pandemic, we supplemented pay for certain of our employees and commissions for third-party dealers and provided access to incremental paid time off for employees experiencing symptoms, taking care of children who were home due to school closures or caring for individuals impacted by the Pandemic.
•We implemented remote working arrangements for many employees with a significant portion of our internal and global care employees transitioned to a work-from-home environment. We also encouraged our corporate and administrative employees to work remotely, if possible.
•We also continue to encourage healthy practices such as social distancing and hand washing and have increased cleaning and sanitation in 2017.all our facilities and stores.
To Keep Our Customers Connected
Hurricane Impacts
•In March, we committed to the FCC’s Keep Americans Connected pledge, and at the FCC’s request, later extended our commitment to June 30, 2020. During this period, we pledged to:
During•Not terminate service to any residential or small business customers because of their inability to pay their bills due to disruptions caused by the thirdPandemic; and fourth quarters
•Waive any late fees that any residential or small business customers incurred because of 2017, our operations in Texas, Florida and Puerto Rico experienced lossestheir economic circumstances related to hurricanes. The impactthe Pandemic.
•After the Pledge extension ended, we continued to operating incomework with our customers to help them maintain service and become current on their accounts, while avoiding financial hardship.
•We also took additional temporary steps in March to ensure that all current T-Mobile customers with smartphone data plans were provided connectivity to learn and work remotely through June 30, 2020, including:
•Providing unlimited high-speed smartphone data to current customers as of March 13, 2020 who had legacy plans without unlimited high-speed data (excluding roaming);
•Giving T-Mobile postpaid and Metro by T-Mobile customers on smartphone plans with mobile hotspot data the ability to add 10GB of Smartphone Mobile HotSpot each month (20GB total);
•Working with our Lifeline partners to provide customers up to 5GB per month of free data;
•Increasing the data allowance, at no extra charge, to schools and students using our EmpowerED digital learning program to ensure each participant had access to at least 20GB of data per month; and
•Providing free international calling to landlines (and, in many cases, mobile numbers) to countries that were significantly impacted by the Pandemic through May 13, 2020.
•In addition:
•We are offering our customers creative, new COVID-safe solutions such as virtual selling and curbside pickup;
•We partnered with multiple spectrum holders and the FCC to successfully deploy additional 600 MHz spectrum on a temporary basis (through June 30, 2020), effectively doubling total 600 MHz LTE capacity across the nation to help ensure customers can stay connected during this critical time; and
•We are working to keep our network fully operational as an essential service to first responders, 911 communications and our customers and continue to expand our 5G network, while adhering to governmental guidelines.
We continue to monitor the Pandemic and its impacts and may adjust our actions as needed to continue to provide our products and services to our communities and employees.
Impact on Results of Operations and Performance Measures for the Year Ended December 31, 2020
For the year ended December 31, 2017, from lost revenue, assets damaged or destroyed2020, we incurred $458 million, before taxes, in supplemental employee payroll, third-party commissions and other hurricane relatedcleaning-related COVID-19 costs, which are included in the table below. We expect additionalSelling, general and administrative expenses to be incurred and customer activity to be impacted in the first quarter of 2018, primarily related to our operations in Puerto Rico. We have recognized insurance recoveries related to those hurricane losses in the amount of approximately $93 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as an offset to the costs incurred within Cost of services in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and as an increase to Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We continue to assessIncome. These costs have been excluded from the damagecalculation of the hurricanes and work with our insurance carriers to submit claims for property damage and business interruption. We expect to record additional insurance recoveries related to these hurricanes in future periods.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except per share amounts, ARPU, ABPU, and bad debt expense as a percentage of total revenues) | Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
| Gross | | Reimbursement | | Net |
| Increase (decrease) | | | | | |
| Revenues | | | | | |
| Branded postpaid revenues | $ | (37 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (37 | ) |
| Of which, branded postpaid phone revenues | (35 | ) | | — |
| | (35 | ) |
| Branded prepaid revenues | (11 | ) | | — |
| | (11 | ) |
| Total service revenues | (48 | ) | | — |
| | (48 | ) |
| Equipment revenues | (8 | ) | | — |
| | (8 | ) |
| Total revenues | (56 | ) | | — |
| | (56 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Operating expenses | | | | | |
| Cost of services | 198 |
| | (93 | ) | | 105 |
|
| Cost of equipment sales | 4 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | 36 |
| | — |
| | 36 |
|
| Of which, bad debt expense | 20 |
| | — |
| | 20 |
|
| Total operating expense | 238 |
| | (93 | ) | | 145 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Operating income (loss) | $ | (294 | ) | | $ | 93 |
| | $ | (201 | ) |
| Net income (loss) | $ | (193 | ) | | $ | 63 |
| | $ | (130 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Earnings per share - basic | $ | (0.23 | ) | | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | (0.16 | ) |
| Earnings per share - diluted | (0.22 | ) | | 0.07 |
| | (0.15 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Operating measures | | | | | |
| Bad debt expense as a percentage of total revenues | 0.05 | % | | — | % | | 0.05 | % |
| Branded postpaid phone ARPU | $ | (0.09 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (0.09 | ) |
| Branded postpaid ABPU | (0.08 | ) | | — |
| | (0.08 | ) |
| Branded prepaid ARPU | (0.05 | ) | | — |
| | (0.05 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Non-GAAP financial measures | | | | | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (294 | ) | | $ | 93 |
| | $ | (201 | ) |
Results of Operations
Highlights for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016
Total revenues of $40.6 billion increased $3.1 billion, or 8%. The increase was primarily driven by growth in service and equipment revenues as further discussed below. On September 1, 2016, we sold our marketing and distribution rights to certain existing T-Mobile co-branded customers to a current MVNO partner for nominal consideration. The MVNO Transaction shifted Branded postpaid revenues to Wholesale revenues, but did not materially impact total revenues.
Service revenues of $30.2 billion increased $2.3 billion, or 8%. The increase was primarily due to growth in our average branded customer base as a result of strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives, promotions and the success of our MetroPCS brand.
Equipment revenues of $9.4 billion increased $648 million, or 7%. The increase was primarily due to higher average revenue per device sold and an increase from customer purchases of leased devices at the end of the lease term, partially offset by lower lease revenues.
Operating income of $4.9 billion increased $838 million, or 21%. The increase was primarily due to higher Total service revenues and lower Depreciation and amortization, partially offset by higher Selling, general and administrative, lower Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses and higher Cost of services expenses.
Net income of $4.5 billion increased $3.1 billion, or 211%. The increase was primarily due to the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the "TCJA"), which resulted in a net tax benefit of $2.2 billion in 2017, and higher operating income driven by the factors described above, partially offset by the negative impact from hurricanes. Net income included net, after-tax spectrum gains of $174 million and $509 million, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, as they represent direct, incremental costs as a result of $11.2 billion increased $574 million, or 5%.our response to the Pandemic. See “Adjusted EBITDA” in the “Performance Measures” section of this MD&A.
Expected Continued Impact on Results of Operations and Performance Measures
We continue to monitor developments regarding the Pandemic and evaluate the appropriate steps needed to align with guidelines from state, local and federal government agencies and do what is best for our employees and customers. The increase was primarilyextent to which the Pandemic impacts our business, operations and financial results will depend on numerous future developments that we are not able to predict at this time, including the duration and scope of the Pandemic, the success of governmental, business
and individual actions that have been and continue to be taken in response to the Pandemic, and the impact on economic activity from the Pandemic and actions taken in response. Such impacts may include:
•Lower net customer additions due to higher operating income drivenlower switching activity in the industry from reduced store traffic due to temporary retail store closures and reduced consumer spending caused by the factors described above,widespread unemployment and other adverse economic effects, partially offset by lower Gainschurn;
•Lower Equipment revenues and lower Cost of equipment sales from lower device sales due to lower switching activity in the industry from reduced store traffic due to temporary retail store closures, which may impact our ability to sell devices;
•Higher bad debt expense on disposalour service and EIP receivable portfolios due to adverse macro-economic conditions. Should these adverse conditions worsen, our operating and financial results could be negatively impacted;
•Continued costs to protect and support our employees and customers; and
•Potential disruptions in our supply chains.
In addition, we have reevaluated, and continue to assess, our spending, including for marketing purposes like advertising, capital projects like build-out of spectrum licenses. Adjusted EBITDA included pre-tax spectrum gainsour stores, travel, third-party services and certain operating expenses. We have taken actions to adjust our spending given the significant uncertainty around the magnitude and duration of $235 millionany recessionary impacts arising from the Pandemic.
For additional risks to our business and $835 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.industry, see Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Net cash provided by operating activitiesResults of $8.0 billion increased $1.8 billion, or 30%. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section for additional information.Operations
Free Cash Flow, a non-GAAP financial measure, of $2.7 billion increased $1.3 billion, or 90%. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section for additional information.
Set forth below is a summary of our consolidated financial results:
| | | | | Year Ended December 31 | | 2020 Versus 2019 | | 2019 Versus 2018 |
| (in millions) | | (in millions) | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ Change | | % Change | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Revenues | | Revenues | | |
| | Postpaid revenues | | Postpaid revenues | | $ | 36,306 | | | $ | 22,673 | | | $ | 20,862 | | | $ | 13,633 | | | 60 | % | | $ | 1,811 | | | 9 | % |
| Prepaid revenues | | Prepaid revenues | | 9,421 | | | 9,543 | | | 9,598 | | | (122) | | | (1) | % | | (55) | | | (1) | % |
| Wholesale revenues | | Wholesale revenues | | 2,590 | | | 1,279 | | | 1,183 | | | 1,311 | | | 103 | % | | 96 | | | 8 | % |
| Roaming and other service revenues | | Roaming and other service revenues | | 2,078 | | | 1,005 | | | 798 | | | 1,073 | | | 107 | % | | 207 | | | 26 | % |
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | 2017 Versus 2016 | | 2016 Versus 2015 | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change | | $ Change | | % Change | |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Branded postpaid revenues | $ | 19,448 |
| | $ | 18,138 |
| | $ | 16,383 |
| | $ | 1,310 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 1,755 |
| | 11 | % | |
| Branded prepaid revenues | 9,380 |
| | 8,553 |
| | 7,553 |
| | 827 |
| | 10 | % | | 1,000 |
| | 13 | % | |
| Wholesale revenues | 1,102 |
| | 903 |
| | 692 |
| | 199 |
| | 22 | % | | 211 |
| | 30 | % | |
| Roaming and other service revenues | 230 |
| | 250 |
| | 193 |
| | (20 | ) | | (8 | )% | | 57 |
| | 30 | % | |
| Total service revenues | 30,160 |
| | 27,844 |
| | 24,821 |
| | 2,316 |
| | 8 | % | | 3,023 |
| | 12 | % | Total service revenues | | 50,395 | | | 34,500 | | | 32,441 | | | 15,895 | | | 46 | % | | 2,059 | | | 6 | % |
| | Equipment revenues | 9,375 |
| | 8,727 |
| | 6,718 |
| | 648 |
| | 7 | % | | 2,009 |
| | 30 | % | Equipment revenues | | 17,312 | | | 9,840 | | | 10,009 | | | 7,472 | | | 76 | % | | (169) | | | (2) | % |
| Other revenues | 1,069 |
| | 919 |
| | 928 |
| | 150 |
| | 16 | % | | (9 | ) | | (1 | )% | Other revenues | | 690 | | | 658 | | | 860 | | | 32 | | | 5 | % | | (202) | | | (23) | % |
| | Total revenues | 40,604 |
| | 37,490 |
| | 32,467 |
| | 3,114 |
| | 8 | % | | 5,023 |
| | 15 | % | Total revenues | | 68,397 | | | 44,998 | | | 43,310 | | | 23,399 | | | 52 | % | | 1,688 | | | 4 | % |
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below | 6,100 |
| | 5,731 |
| | 5,554 |
| | 369 |
| | 6 | % | | 177 |
| | 3 | % | Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below | | 11,878 | | | 6,622 | | | 6,307 | | | 5,256 | | | 79 | % | | 315 | | | 5 | % |
| Cost of equipment sales | 11,608 |
| | 10,819 |
| | 9,344 |
| | 789 |
| | 7 | % | | 1,475 |
| | 16 | % | |
| Cost of equipment sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below | | Cost of equipment sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below | | 16,388 | | | 11,899 | | | 12,047 | | | 4,489 | | | 38 | % | | (148) | | | (1) | % |
| Selling, general and administrative | 12,259 |
| | 11,378 |
| | 10,189 |
| | 881 |
| | 8 | % | | 1,189 |
| | 12 | % | Selling, general and administrative | | 18,926 | | | 14,139 | | | 13,161 | | | 4,787 | | | 34 | % | | 978 | | | 7 | % |
| Impairment expense | | Impairment expense | | 418 | | | — | | | — | | | 418 | | | NM | | — | | | NM |
| Depreciation and amortization | 5,984 |
| | 6,243 |
| | 4,688 |
| | (259 | ) | | (4 | )% | | 1,555 |
| | 33 | % | Depreciation and amortization | | 14,151 | | | 6,616 | | | 6,486 | | | 7,535 | | | 114 | % | | 130 | | | 2 | % |
| Cost of MetroPCS business combination | — |
| | 104 |
| | 376 |
| | (104 | ) | | (100 | )% | | (272 | ) | | (72 | )% | |
| Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses | (235 | ) | | (835 | ) | | (163 | ) | | 600 |
| | (72 | )% | | (672 | ) | | NM |
| |
| Total operating expense | 35,716 |
| | 33,440 |
| | 29,988 |
| | 2,276 |
| | 7 | % | | 3,452 |
| | 12 | % | |
| | Total operating expenses | | Total operating expenses | | 61,761 | | | 39,276 | | | 38,001 | | | 22,485 | | | 57 | % | | 1,275 | | | 3 | % |
| Operating income | 4,888 |
| | 4,050 |
| | 2,479 |
| | 838 |
| | 21 | % | | 1,571 |
| | 63 | % | Operating income | | 6,636 | | | 5,722 | | | 5,309 | | | 914 | | | 16 | % | | 413 | | | 8 | % |
| Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
| Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Interest expense | (1,111 | ) | | (1,418 | ) | | (1,085 | ) | | 307 |
| | (22 | )% | | (333 | ) | | 31 | % | Interest expense | | (2,483) | | | (727) | | | (835) | | | (1,756) | | | 242 | % | | 108 | | | (13) | % |
| Interest expense to affiliates | (560 | ) | | (312 | ) | | (411 | ) | | (248 | ) | | 79 | % | | 99 |
| | (24 | )% | Interest expense to affiliates | | (247) | | | (408) | | | (522) | | | 161 | | | (39) | % | | 114 | | | (22) | % |
| Interest income | 17 |
| | 13 |
| | 6 |
| | 4 |
| | 31 | % | | 7 |
| | 117 | % | Interest income | | 29 | | | 24 | | | 19 | | | 5 | | | 21 | % | | 5 | | | 26 | % |
| Other expense, net | (73 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (67 | ) | | NM |
| | 5 |
| | (45 | )% | Other expense, net | | (405) | | | (8) | | | (54) | | | (397) | | | 4,963 | % | | 46 | | | (85) | % |
| | Total other expense, net | (1,727 | ) | | (1,723 | ) | | (1,501 | ) | | (4 | ) | | — | % | | (222 | ) | | 15 | % | Total other expense, net | | (3,106) | | | (1,119) | | | (1,392) | | | (1,987) | | | 178 | % | | 273 | | | (20) | % |
| Income before income taxes | 3,161 |
| | 2,327 |
| | 978 |
| | 834 |
| | 36 | % | | 1,349 |
| | 138 | % | |
| Income tax benefit (expense) | 1,375 |
| | (867 | ) | | (245 | ) | | 2,242 |
| | (259 | )% | | (622 | ) | | 254 | % | |
| | Income from continuing operations before income taxes | | Income from continuing operations before income taxes | | 3,530 | | | 4,603 | | | 3,917 | | | (1,073) | | | (23) | % | | 686 | | | 18 | % |
| Income tax expense | | Income tax expense | | (786) | | | (1,135) | | | (1,029) | | | 349 | | | (31) | % | | (106) | | | 10 | % |
| | Income from continuing operations | | Income from continuing operations | | 2,744 | | | 3,468 | | | 2,888 | | | (724) | | | (21) | % | | 580 | | | 20 | % |
| Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | | Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | | 320 | | | — | | | — | | | 320 | | | NM | | — | | | NM |
| Net income | $ | 4,536 |
| | $ | 1,460 |
| | $ | 733 |
| | $ | 3,076 |
| | 211 | % | | $ | 727 |
| | 99 | % | Net income | | $ | 3,064 | | | $ | 3,468 | | | $ | 2,888 | | | $ | (404) | | | (12) | % | | $ | 580 | | | 20 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Statement of Cash Flows Data | | Statement of Cash Flows Data | | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 7,962 |
| | $ | 6,135 |
| | $ | 5,414 |
| | $ | 1,827 |
| | 30 | % | | $ | 721 |
| | 13 | % | Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 8,640 | | | $ | 6,824 | | | $ | 3,899 | | | $ | 1,816 | | | 27 | % | | $ | 2,925 | | | 75 | % |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (11,064 | ) | | (5,680 | ) | | (9,560 | ) | | (5,384 | ) | | 95 | % | | 3,880 |
| | (41 | )% | Net cash used in investing activities | | (12,715) | | | (4,125) | | | (579) | | | (8,590) | | | 208 | % | | (3,546) | | | 612 | % |
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (1,179 | ) | | 463 |
| | 3,413 |
| | (1,642 | ) | | (355 | )% | | (2,950 | ) | | (86 | )% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 13,010 | | | (2,374) | | | (3,336) | | | 15,384 | | | (648) | % | | 962 | | | (29) | % |
| Non-GAAP Financial Measures | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Non-GAAP Financial Measures | | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 11,213 |
| | $ | 10,639 |
| | $ | 7,807 |
| | $ | 574 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 2,832 |
| | 36 | % | Adjusted EBITDA | | 24,557 | | | 13,383 | | | 12,398 | | | 11,174 | | | 83 | % | | 985 | | | 8 | % |
| Free Cash Flow | 2,725 |
| | 1,433 |
| | 690 |
| | 1,292 |
| | 90 | % | | 743 |
| | 108 | % | |
| Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps | | Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps | | 3,001 | | | 4,319 | | 3,552 | | (1,318) | | (31) | % | | 767 | | 22 | % |
|
NM - Not Meaningful
The following discussion and analysis is for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, compared to the same period in 20162019 unless otherwise stated.For a discussion and analysis of the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the same period in
2018, please refer to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the SEC on February 6, 2020.
Total revenues increased $3.1$23.4 billion, or 8%, primarily due to higher52%. The components of this change are discussed below.
Postpaid revenues from branded postpaid and prepaid customers as well as higher equipment revenues as discussed below.
Branded postpaid revenues increased $1.3$13.6 billion, or 7%60%, primarily from:
A 7% increase in•Higher average branded postpaid phone customers, primarily from customers acquired in the Merger and the success of new customer segments and rate plans, as well as continued growth in existing and new markets;
•Higher average postpaid other customers, primarily from customers acquired in the Merger and growth in other connected devices (tablets and wearable products) and growth in public and educational sector customers; and
•Higher postpaid phone ARPU, primarily as a result of customers acquired in the Merger. See “Postpaid Phone ARPU” in the “Performance Measures” section of this MD&A.
Prepaid revenues were essentially flat.
Wholesale revenues increased $1.3 billion, or 103%, primarily from:
•Our Master Network Service Agreement with DISH, which went into effect on July 1, 2020; and
•Customers acquired in the Merger.
Roaming and other service revenues increased $1.1 billion, or 107%, primarily from:
•Inclusion of wireline operations acquired in the Merger; and
•Higher Lifeline, advertising and affiliate revenues primarily due to operations acquired in the Merger; partially offset by
•Lower international roaming due to the impact of the Pandemic, and lower domestic roaming due to revenue generated from Sprint customers roaming on the T-Mobile network in periods before the Merger.
Equipment revenues increased $7.5 billion, or 76%, primarily from:
•An increase of $3.6 billion in lease revenues due to a higher number of customer devices under lease, primarily from leases acquired in the Merger;
•An increase of $2.5 billion in device sales revenue, excluding purchased leased devices, primarily from:
•An increase in the number of devices sold, excluding purchased leased devices, due to an increase in our customer base driven by the continued strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives and promotions for services and devices, including the growing success of our business channel, T-Mobile for Business; and
The positive impact from a decrease in the non-cash net revenue deferral for Data Stash; partially offset by
A 1% decrease in branded postpaid phone ARPU primarily driven by dilution from promotions targeting families and new segments;
The MVNO Transaction; and
The negative impact from hurricanes of approximately $37 million.
Branded prepaid revenues increased $827 million, or 10%, primarily from:
A 7% increase in average branded prepaid customers primarily driven by growth in the customer base; and
A 2% increase in branded prepaid ARPU from the success of our MetroPCS brand and the optimization of our third-party distribution channels; partially offset by
The negative impact from hurricanes of approximately $11 million.
Wholesale revenues increased $199 million, or 22%, primarily from the impact of the MVNO Transaction, growth in MVNO customers and higher minimum commitment revenues.
Roaming and other service revenues decreased $20 million, or 8%.
Equipment revenues increased$648 million, or 7%, primarily from:
An increase of $445 million in device sales revenues excluding purchased lease devices, primarily due to:to the Merger; and
•Higher average revenue per device sold, excluding purchased leased devices, due to an increase in the high-end device mix anddue to the impactsMerger;
•An increase of an OEM recall$625 million in sales of its smartphoneleased devices, in 2016, partially offset byprimarily due to an increase in promotionspurchased leased devices as a result of the Merger; and device-related commissions spending; partially offset by
A 2% decrease in the number of devices sold, excluding purchased lease devices, driven by a lower branded postpaid handset upgrade rate. Device sales revenue is recognized at the time of sale;
•An increase of $395 million from customers' purchase of leased devices at the end of the lease term;
An increase of $231 million primarily related to proceeds from liquidation of returned customer handsets in 2017; and
An increase of $130$622 million in SIM and upgrade revenue; partially offset by
A decrease of $539 million in lease revenues from declining JUMP! On Demand population due to shifting focus to our EIP financing option beginning in the first quarter of 2016;
A decrease of $18 million in accessory revenue primarily related to the decreaseliquidation of a higher volume of returned devices primarily as a result of the Merger.
Operating expenses increased $22.5 billion, or 57%. The components of this change are discussed below.
Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, increased $5.3 billion, or 79%, primarily from:
•An increase in device sales volume;expenses associated with leases, backhaul agreements and other network expenses, such as roaming,
The negative impact from hurricanes
acquired in the Merger and the continued build-out of our nationwide 5G network;
Under our JUMP! On Demand program, upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers must return or purchase their device. Revenue for purchased leased devices is recorded as equipment revenues when revenue recognition criteria have been met.
Gross EIP device financing to our customers increased by $437•An increase of $646 million for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, in Merger-related costs including incremental costs associated with accelerating amortization of right-of-use assets for terminated cell sites leases and the decommissioning of certain small cell sites and distributed antenna systems;
•Higher employee-related and benefit-related costs primarily due to growthincreased headcount as a result of the Merger;
•An increase in the gross amount of equipment financed on EIP. The increase was also due to certain customers on leased devices reaching the end of lease term who financed their devices over a nine-month EIP.
Other revenues increased $150 million, or 16%,repair and maintenance costs, primarily due to higher revenue from revenue share agreements with third parties.the Merger; and
•An increase in regulatory and roaming costs primarily due to the Merger.
Our operating expenses consist of the following categories:
Cost of services primarily includes costs directly attributable to providing wireless service through the operation of our network, including direct switch and cell site costs, such as rent, network access and transport costs, utilities, maintenance, associated labor costs, long distance costs, regulatory program costs, roaming fees paid to other carriers and data content costs.
Cost of equipment sales primarily includes costs, exclusive of devicesdepreciation and accessories sold to customers and dealers, device costs to fulfill insurance and warranty claims, costs related to returned and purchased leased devices, write-downs of inventory related to shrinkage and obsolescence, and shipping and handling costs.
Selling, general and administrative primarily includes costs not directly attributable to providing wireless service for the operation of sales, customer care and corporate activities. These include commissions paid to dealers and retail employees for activations and upgrades, labor and facilities costs associated with retail sales force and administrative space, marketing and promotional costs, customer support and billing, bad debt expense, losses from sales of receivables and back office administrative support activities.
Operating expensesamortization, increased $2.3$4.5 billion, or 7%, primarily from higher Cost of services, Cost of equipment sales, Selling, general and administrative and lower Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses, partially offset by lower Depreciation and amortization as discussed below.
Cost of services increased $369 million, or 6%38%, primarily from:
Higher lease, engineering and employee-related expenses associated with network expansion; and
The negative impact from hurricanes of $105 million, net of insurance recoveries; partially offset by
Lower long distance and toll costs as we continue to renegotiate contracts with vendors; and
Lower regulatory expenses.
Cost of equipment sales increased $789 million, or 7%, primarily from:
•An increase of $806 million$2.8 billion in device cost of equipment sales, excluding purchased leased devices, primarily due to:
from:A higher average cost per device sold primarily from an•An increase in the high-end device mix and from the impact of an OEM recall of its smartphone devices in 2016; partially offset by
A 2% decrease in the number of devices sold, excluding purchased leaseleased devices, driven by a lower branded postpaid handset upgrade rate.
due to an increase in our customer base primarily due to the Merger; and•Higher average costs per device sold, excluding purchased leased devices, due to an increase in the high-end device mix due to the Merger;
•An increase of $201$759 million in leaseleased device cost of equipment sales, primarily due to:
to an increase in purchased leased devices as a result of the Merger; and•An increase of $511 million in lease buyoutscosts related to the liquidation of a higher volume of returned devices primarily as leases began reaching their term dates in 2017; partially offset by
a result of the Merger.A decrease in write downs
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $4.8 billion, or 34%, primarily from:
•Higher employee-related costs due to market value of devices returned to inventory resulting from a decreasean increase in the number of leased device upgrades.employees primarily from the Merger;
These increases are partially offset by a decrease•Higher external labor and professional services, lease and advertising expense from the Merger;
•$1.3 billion of $159Merger-related costs, including transaction costs associated with legal and professional services and restructuring costs including severance and store rationalization, compared to $620 million primarily related to:
A decrease in insurance and warranty claims;
Higher proceeds from liquidation of returned customer handsets under our insurance programs; and
Lower inventory adjustments related to physical adjustments and obsolete inventory; partially offset by
HigherMerger-related costs from an increase in the volume of liquidated returnedyear ended December 31, 2019;
•Higher commission expense, primarily due to:
•Higher gross customer handsets outside of our insurance programs.
A decrease of $57 million in accessory costadditions primarily driven bydue to the decrease in device sales volume.
Under our JUMP! On Demand program, upon device upgrade or at the endincreased size of the lease term, customers must return or purchase their device. The costcompany as a result of purchased leased devices is recorded as Cost of equipment sales. Returned devices transferred from Property and equipment, net are recorded as inventory and are valued at the lower of cost or market with any write-down to market recognized as Cost of equipment sales.
Selling, general and administrative increased $881 million, or 8%, primarily from higher commissions, employee-related costs, promotional and advertising costs, and costs related to outsourced functions and managed services to support our growing customer base,Merger, partially offset by lower handset repair services cost. Additionally,switching activity in the negative impactindustry from hurricanesreduced store traffic due to retail store closures arising from the Pandemic; partially offset by
•Lower commissions expense due to lower prepaid gross additions and compensation structure changes;
•Higher bad debt expense, primarily due to customers acquired as a result of approximately $36the Merger and the recording of estimated losses associated with the new credit loss standard, including incremental bad debt for the estimated macro-economic impacts of the Pandemic; and
•Higher legal-related expenses from recording an estimated accrual associated with the FCC Notice of Apparent Liability and commitments associated with the Merger.
•Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 included $458 million contributed toof supplemental employee payroll, third-party commissions and cleaning-related COVID-19 costs.
Impairment expense was $418 million and consisted of the increase.following:
Depreciation•A $218 million impairment on the goodwill in the Layer3 reporting unit; and amortization decreased $259
•A $200 million or 4%, primarily from:
Lower depreciation expenseimpairment on the capitalized software development costs related to our JUMP! On Demand program resultingpostpaid billing system.
•There was no impairment expense for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Depreciation and amortization increased $7.5 billion, or 114%, primarily as a result of the Merger, including:
•Higher depreciation expense from a lower number ofassets acquired in the Merger, excluding leased devices, under lease. Under our JUMP! On Demand program,and network expansion from the cost of a leased wireless device is depreciated to its estimated residual value over the period expected to provide utility to us; partially offset by
The continued build-out of our 4G LTEnationwide 5G network;
The implementation•Higher depreciation expense on leased devices resulting from a higher total number of the first component of our new billing system; and
Growth in our distribution footprint.
Cost of MetroPCS business combination decreased $104 million. On July 1, 2015, we officially completed the shutdown of the MetroPCS CDMA network. Network decommissioning costs primarily relate to the acceleration ofcustomer devices under lease, costs for cell sites that would have otherwise been recognized as cost of services over the remaining lease term had we not decommissioned the cell sites. We do not expect to incur significant additional network decommissioning costs in 2018.
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses decreased $600 million, or 72%, primarily from gains of $636 millioncustomers acquired in the Merger; and $191 million on disposal of spectrum licenses with AT&T and Sprint during
•Higher amortization from intangible assets acquired in the first quarter and third quarter of 2016, respectively. These 2016 gains were partially offset by gains of $235 million from spectrum license transactions with AT&T and Verizon in 2017.Merger.
Net income increased $3.1 billion, primarily due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ("TCJA") as discussed below, higher operating income and a net decrease in interest expense, partially offset by the negative impact from hurricanes of approximately $130 million, net of insurance recoveries.
Operating income, the components of which are discussed above, increased $838$914 million, or 21%16%.
Interest expense increased $1.8 billion, or 242%, primarily from:
•The negative impactassumption of debt with a fair value of $31.8 billion in connection with the Merger;
•The issuance of an aggregate of $19.0 billion in Senior Secured Notes and the entry into a $4.0 billion secured term loan in April 2020 in connection with the Merger;
•Amortization of interest rate swap derivatives beginning upon settlement in April 2020; and
•The issuance of an aggregate of $8.75 billion in Senior Secured Notes in October 2020.
Interest expense to affiliates decreased $161 million, or 39%, primarily from the hurricanesredemption of an aggregate of $5.25 billion in Senior Notes to affiliates and the repayment of an aggregate of $4.0 billion in Incremental term loan facility to affiliates in 2020, partially offset by lower capitalized interest.
Other expense, net increased $397 million, primarily from losses on the extinguishment of debt.
Income from continuing operations before income taxes, the components of which are discussed above, was $3.5 billion and $4.6 billion for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Income tax expense decreased $349 million, or 31%, primarily from:
•Lower income before income taxes; and
•A lower effective tax rate, primarily due to changes in state income taxes and excess tax benefits, partially offset by an increase in non-deductible expenses, including certain Merger-related costs. The effective tax rate was 22.3% and 24.7% for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Income from continuing operations decreased $724 million, or 21%, primarily from:
•Higher Interest expense; and
•Higher Other expense, net; partially offset by
•Higher operating income; and
•Lower Income tax expense.
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax was $320 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 was approximately $201 million, net of insurance recoveries.
Income tax benefit (expense) changed $2.2 billion, from an expense of $867 million in 2016 to a benefit of $1.4 billion in 2017 primarily from:
A lower effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was a benefit of 43.5% in 2017, compared to an expense of 37.3% in 2016. The decrease in the effective income tax rate was primarily due to the impact of the TCJA, which resulted in a net tax benefit of $2.2 billion in 2017, substantially due to a re-measurement of deferred tax assets2020, and liabilities; and
A $319 million reduction in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in certain state jurisdictions in 2017; partially offset by
Higher income before income taxes.
The TCJA was enacted December 22, 2017 and is generally effective beginning January 1, 2018. The TCJA includes numerous changes to existing tax law, which have been reflected in the 2017 consolidated financial statements. The state corporate income tax impact of the TCJA is complex and will continue to evolve as jurisdictions evaluate conformity to the numerous federal tax law changes. As such, a re-measurement of state deferred tax assets and liabilities and the associated net tax benefit or expense may result within the next 12 months. The TCJA resulted in a net tax benefit of $2.2 billion in 2017.
See Note 11 - Income Taxes of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
Interest expensedecreased $307 million, or 22%, primarily from:
A decrease from the early redemption of our $1.98 billion Senior Secured Term Loans and $8.3 billion of Senior Notes; partially offset by
An increase from the issuance of the $1.5 billion of Senior Notes in March 2017; and
An increase from the issuance of the $1.0 billion of Senior Notes in April 2016.
Interest expense to affiliates increased $248 million, or 79%, primarily from:
Issuance of $4.0 billion secured term loan facility with Deutsche Telekom AG ("DT") entered into in January 2017;
Issuance of a total of $4.0 billion in Senior Notes in May 2017;
An increase in drawings on our Revolving Credit Facility; and
Issuance of $500 million in Senior Notes in September 2017; partially offset by
A decrease from lower interest rates achieved through refinancing of a total of $2.5 billion of Senior Reset Notes in April 2017.
See Note 7 – Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
Other expense, net increased $67 million primarily from:
A $73 million net loss recognized from the early redemption of certain Senior Notes; and
A $13 million net loss recognized from the refinancing of our outstanding Senior Secured Term Loans.
See Note 7 – Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
Net income included net, after-tax gains on disposal of spectrum licenses of $174 million and $509 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Guarantor Subsidiaries
The financial condition and results of operations of the Parent, Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries is substantially similar to our consolidated financial condition. The most significant components of the financial condition of our Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | Change |
| (in millions) | $ | | % |
| Other current assets | $ | 628 |
| | $ | 565 |
| | $ | 63 |
| | 11 | % |
| Property and equipment, net | 306 |
| | 375 |
| | (69 | ) | | (18 | )% |
| Tower obligations | 2,198 |
| | 2,221 |
| | (23 | ) | | (1 | )% |
| Total stockholders' deficit | (1,454 | ) | | (1,374 | ) | | (80 | ) | | 6 | % |
The most significant componentsconsists of the results of operations of our Non-Guarantor Subsidiariesthe Prepaid Business that was divested on July 1, 2020. There were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | Change |
| (in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | $ | | % |
| Service revenues | $ | 2,113 |
| | $ | 2,023 |
| | $ | 90 |
| | 4 | % |
| Cost of equipment sales | 1,003 |
| | 1,027 |
| | (24 | ) | | (2 | )% |
| Selling, general and administrative | 856 |
| | 868 |
| | (12 | ) | | (1 | )% |
| Total comprehensive income | 28 |
| | 24 |
| | 4 |
| | 17 | % |
The change to the results ofno discontinued operations of our Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries was primarily from:
Higher Service revenues primarily due to the result of an increase in activity of the non-guarantor subsidiary that provides device insurance, primarily driven by growth in our customer base;
Lower Cost of equipment sales expenses primarily due to a decrease in device insurance claims and a decrease in higher cost devices used, partially offset by a decrease in device non-return fees charged to customers; and
Lower Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily due to a decrease in device insurance program service fees, partially offset by higher costs to support our growing customer base.
All other results of operations of the Parent, Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries are substantially similar to the Company’s consolidated results of operations. See Note 16 – Guarantor Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
The following discussion and analysis is for the year ended December 31,
2016,2019. For more information regarding the Prepaid Transaction, see Note 12 – Discontinued Operations of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net income, the components of which are discussed above, decreased $404 million, or 12%, and included the following:
•Merger-related costs, net of tax, of $1.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to $501 million for the same periodyear ended December 31, 2019.
•The negative impact of supplemental employee payroll, third-party commissions and cleaning-related COVID-19 costs, net of tax, of $339 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to no impact for the year ended December 31, 2019.
•Impairment expense of $366 million, net of tax, for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to no impairment expense for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Guarantor Financial Information
On March 2, 2020, the SEC adopted amendments to the financial disclosure requirements for guarantors and issuers of guaranteed securities, as well for affiliates whose securities collateralize a registrant’s securities. We early adopted the requirements of the amendments on January 1, 2020, which included replacing guarantor condensed consolidating financial information with summarized financial information for the consolidated obligor group (Parent, Issuer, and Guarantor Subsidiaries) and no longer requiring guarantor cash flow information, financial information for non-guarantor subsidiaries, or a reconciliation to the consolidated results.
On April 1, 2020, in 2015 unlessconnection with the closing of the Merger, we assumed certain registered debt to third parties issued by Sprint, Sprint Communications, Inc. and Sprint Capital Corporation (collectively, the “Sprint Issuers”). Amounts previously disclosed for the estimated values of certain acquired assets and liabilities assumed have been adjusted based on additional information arising subsequent to the initial valuation. These revisions to the estimated values did not have a significant impact on our summarized financial information for the consolidated obligor group.
Pursuant to the applicable indentures and supplemental indentures, the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties issued by T-Mobile USA, Inc. and the Sprint Issuers (collectively, the “Issuers”) is fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by T-Mobile (“Parent”) and certain of Parent’s 100% owned subsidiaries (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”).
The guarantees of the Guarantor Subsidiaries are subject to release in limited circumstances only upon the occurrence of certain customary conditions. The indentures, supplemental indentures and credit agreements governing the long-term debt contain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Issuers or borrowers and the Guarantor Subsidiaries to incur more debt, pay dividends and make distributions, make certain investments, repurchase stock, create liens or other encumbrances, enter into transactions with affiliates, enter into transactions that restrict dividends or distributions from subsidiaries, and merge, consolidate or sell, or otherwise stated.
dispose of, substantially all of their assets. Certain prior year amountsprovisions of each of the credit agreements, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the changelong-term debt restrict the ability of the Issuers or borrowers to loan funds or make payments to Parent. However, the Issuers or borrowers and Guarantor Subsidiaries are allowed to make certain permitted payments to Parent under the terms of the indentures, supplemental indentures and credit agreements.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.” The standard simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in accounting principle which presentsTopic 740. We early adopted the imputed discountstandard on EIP receivables, which is amortized overJanuary 1, 2020 and have applied the financed installment term usingstandard retrospectively to all periods presented. Upon the effective interest method,adoption of the standard, deferred tax assets of non-guarantor entities in aggregate of $163 million were reclassified and was previously presented within Interest income innetted with the deferred tax liabilities of the guarantor obligor group of the debt issued by T-Mobile USA, Inc. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, is now presented within Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Incomeconsolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.
In March 2020, certain Guarantor Subsidiaries became non-Guarantor Subsidiaries. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
period’s presentation.
See Note 1 - Summary
In connection with the preparation of Significant Accounting Policiesour guarantor financial information for the year ended December 31, 2020, we determined that the summarized balance sheet information and summarized results of operations for the Notesconsolidated obligor group of debt issued by T-Mobile USA, Inc., as presented in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2020, June 30, 2020, and September 30, 2020, should be adjusted to exclude investments in non-guarantor subsidiaries and the related equity method income from non-guarantor subsidiaries as of and for the year-to-date periods ending December 31, 2019, March 31, 2020, June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2020. We also determined the summarized balance sheet information
and summarized results of operations for the consolidated obligor groups of debt issued by Sprint, Sprint Communications, Inc. and Sprint Capital Corporation, as presented in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended June 30, 2020, and September 30, 2020, should be adjusted as well to exclude investments in their respective non-guarantor subsidiaries for the year-to-date periods ending June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2020. Therefore, we have updated the historical summarized financial information for these periods and obligor groups as set forth below. This adjustment does not impact the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
Total revenues increased $5.0 billion,any quarterly or 15%, primarily due to:
Branded postpaid revenues increased $1.8 billion, or 11%, primarily from:
A 13% increase in the number of average branded postpaid phoneannual periods and mobile broadband customers, driven by strong customer responsedoes not impact guarantor financial information filed prior to our Un-carrier initiativesadoption of the new disclosure requirements for guarantors and promotions for services and devices;issuers of guaranteed securities on January 1, 2020.
Higher device insurance program revenues primarily from customer growth; and
Higher regulatory program revenues; partially offset byBasis of Presentation
An increase in the non-cash net revenue deferral for Data Stash; and
The MVNO Transaction.
Branded prepaid revenues increased $1.0 billion, or 13%, primarily from:
A 13% increase in the number of average branded prepaid customers driven by the success of our MetroPCS brand; and
Continued growth in new markets.
Wholesale revenues increased $211 million, or 30%, primarily from:
The MVNO Transaction;
Growth in customers of certain MVNO partners; and
An increase in data usage per customer.
Roaming and other service revenues increased $57 million, or 30%, primarily due to higher international roaming revenues driven by an increase in inbound roaming volumes.
Equipment revenues increased$2.0 billion, or 30%, primarily from:
An increase of $1.2 billion in lease revenues resulting from the launch of our JUMP! On Demand program at the endfollowing tables include summarized financial information of the second quarterobligor groups of 2015. Revenues associateddebt issued by T-Mobile USA, Inc., Sprint, Sprint Communications, Inc., and Sprint Capital Corporation. The summarized financial information of each obligor group is presented on a combined basis with leased devices are recognized overbalances and transactions within the lease term; and
An increase of $570 millionobligor group eliminated. Investments in device sales revenues, primarily due to a 9% increase in the number of devices sold. Device sales revenue is recognized at the time of sale.
Gross EIP device financing to our customers increased by $923 million to $6.1 billion primarily due to an increase in devices financed due to our focus on EIP sales in 2016, compared to focus on devices financed on JUMP! On Demand after the launch of the program at the end of the second quarter of 2015.
Other revenues decreased $9 million, or 1%, primarily due to:
| |
• | An increase in sales of certain EIP receivables pursuant to our EIP receivables sales arrangement resulting from an increase in the maximum funding commitment in June 2016. Interest associated with EIP receivables is imputed at the time of a device sale and then recognized over the financed installment term. See Note 2 - Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information; and |
Focus on devices financed on JUMP! On Demand in the third and fourth quarters of 2015 following the launch of the program of at the end of the second quarter 2015; partially offset by
Higher revenue from revenue share agreements with third parties; and
An increase in co-location rental income from leasing space on wireless communication towers to third parties.
Operating expenses increased $3.5 billion, or 12%, primarily due to:
Cost of services increased $177 million, or 3%, primarily from:
Higher regulatory program costs and expenses associated with network expansion and the build-outequity in earnings of our network to utilize our 700 MHz A-Block spectrum licenses, including higher employee-related costs; partially offset by
Lower long distance and toll costs; and
Synergies realized from the decommissioning of the MetroPCS CDMA network.
Cost of equipment sales increased $1.5 billion, or 16%, primarily from:
A 9% increasenon-guarantor subsidiaries which would otherwise be consolidated in the number of devices sold; and
An increase in the impact from returned and purchased leased devices.
Under our JUMP! On Demand program, the cost of the leased wireless device is capitalized and recognized as depreciation expense over the term of the lease rather than recognized as cost of equipment sales when the device is delivered to the customer. Additionally, upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers must return or purchase their device. Returned devices transferred from Property and equipment, net are recorded as inventory and are valued at the lower of cost or marketaccordance with any write-down to market recognized as Cost of equipment sales.
Selling, general and administrative increased $1.2 billion, or 12%, primarily from strategic investments to support our growing customer base including higher:
Employee-related costs;
Commissions driven by an increase in branded customer additions; and
Promotional costs.
Depreciation and amortization increased $1.6 billion, or 33%, primarily from:
$1.5 billion in depreciation expense related to devices leased under our JUMP! On Demand program launched at the end of the second quarter of 2015. Under our JUMP! On Demand program, the cost of a leased wireless device is depreciated over the lease term to its estimated residual value. The total number of devices under lease was higher year-over-year, resulting in higher depreciation expense; and
The continued build-out of our 4G LTE network.
Cost of MetroPCS business combination decreased $272 million, or 72%, primarily from lower network decommissioning costs. In 2014, we began decommissioning the MetroPCS CDMA network and certain other redundant network cell sites as part of the business combination. On July 1, 2015, we officially completed the shutdown of the MetroPCS CDMA network. Network decommissioning costs, whichU.S. GAAP are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA, primarily relatethe below summarized financial information pursuant to SEC Regulation S-X Rule 13-01.
The summarized balance sheet information for the accelerationconsolidated obligor group of lease costs for cell sites that would have otherwise been recognized as cost of services over the remaining lease term had we not decommissioned the cell sites.
Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses increased $672 million primarily from a $636 million gain from a spectrum license transaction with AT&T recordeddebt issued by T-Mobile USA, Inc. is presented in the first quarter of 2016 and $199 million from other transactions in 2016, compared totable below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | March 31, 2020 | | June 30, 2020 | | September 30, 2020 | | December 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 | | | | |
| Current assets | $ | 8,431 | | | $ | 23,105 | | | $ | 18,035 | | | $ | 22,638 | | | $ | 8,177 | | | | | |
| Noncurrent assets | 77,827 | | | 154,164 | | | 164,220 | | | 165,294 | | | 77,684 | | | | | |
| Current liabilities | 14,125 | | | 21,487 | | | 17,765 | | | 19,982 | | | 11,885 | | | | | |
| Noncurrent liabilities | 41,330 | | | 101,662 | | | 109,249 | | | 112,930 | | | 43,448 | | | | | |
| Due to non-guarantors | — | | | 7,054 | | | 7,183 | | | 7,433 | | | — | | | | | |
| Due from non-guarantors | 358 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 346 | | | | | |
| Due to related parties | 14,215 | | | 6,067 | | | 4,846 | | | 4,873 | | | 14,173 | | | | | |
| Due from related parties | 26 | | | 24 | | | 19 | | | 22 | | | 20 | | | | | |
Net income increased $727 million, or 99%, primarily from:
Operating income, the components of which are discussed above, increased $1.6 billion, or 63%.
Interest expense to affiliates decreased $99 million, or 24%, primarily from:
Changes in the fair value of embedded derivative instruments associated with our Senior Reset Notes issued to Deutsch Telekom in 2015; partially offset by
Higher interest rates on certain Senior Reset Notes issued to Deutsch Telekom, which were adjusted at reset dates in the second quarter of 2016 and in 2015.
Income tax expense increased $622 million, or 254%, primarily from:
Higher income before income taxes; and
A higher effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was 37.3% in 2016, compared to 25.1% in 2015. The increase in the effective income tax rate was primarily due to income tax benefits for discrete income tax items recognized in 2015 that did not impact 2016; partially offset by the recognition of $58 million of excess tax benefits related to share-based payments following the adoption of ASU 2016-09 as of January 1, 2016.
Interest expense increased $333 million, or 31%, primarily from:
Higher average debt balances with third parties; and
Lower capitalized interest costs of $83 million primarily due to a higher level of build out of our network to utilize our 700 MHz A-Block spectrum licenses in 2015, compared to 2016.
Net income during 2016 and 2015 included net, after-tax gains on disposal of spectrum licenses of $509 million and $100 million, respectively.
Guarantor Subsidiaries
The financial condition andsummarized results of operations information for the consolidated obligor group of debt issued by T-Mobile USA, Inc. is presented in the Parent, Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries is substantially similar to our consolidated financial condition.table below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended
March 31, 2020 | | Six Months Ended
June 30, 2020 | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2020 | | Year Ended December 31, 2020 | | Year Ended December 31, 2019 | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total revenues | $ | 10,694 | | | $ | 28,071 | | | $ | 47,076 | | | $ | 67,112 | | | $ | 43,431 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating income | 1,309 | | | 1,525 | | | 3,353 | | | 4,335 | | | 4,761 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | 809 | | | 412 | | | 1,029 | | | 1,148 | | | 2,860 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenue from non-guarantors | 259 | | | 656 | | | 1,088 | | | 1,496 | | | 974 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating expenses to non-guarantors | 129 | | | 775 | | | 1,443 | | | 2,127 | | | 668 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other expense to non-guarantors | — | | | (40) | | | (77) | | | (114) | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The most significant componentssummarized balance sheet information for the consolidated obligor group of debt issued by Sprint and Sprint Communications, Inc. is presented in the financial condition of our Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries were as follows:table below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | June 30, 2020 | | September 30, 2020 | | December 31, 2020 | | | | |
| Current assets | $ | 1,619 | | | $ | 1,051 | | | $ | 2,646 | | | | | |
| Noncurrent assets | 49,525 | | | 25,512 | | | 26,278 | | | | | |
| Current liabilities | 4,716 | | | 3,317 | | | 4,209 | | | | | |
| Noncurrent liabilities | 64,845 | | | 61,437 | | | 65,161 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Due from non-guarantors | 49,254 | | | 25,231 | | | 25,993 | | | | | |
| Due to related parties | 6,025 | | | 4,774 | | | 4,786 | | | | | |
| Due from related parties | — | | | 5 | | | — | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 | | Change |
| (in millions) | $ | | % |
| Other current assets | $ | 565 |
| | $ | 400 |
| | $ | 165 |
| | 41 | % |
| Property and equipment, net | 375 |
| | 454 |
| | (79 | ) | | (17 | )% |
| Tower obligations | 2,221 |
| | 2,247 |
| | (26 | ) | | (1 | )% |
| Total stockholders' deficit | (1,374 | ) | | (1,359 | ) | | (15 | ) | | (1 | )% |
The most significant components of thesummarized results of operations information for the consolidated obligor group of our Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries were as follows:debt issued by Sprint and Sprint Communications, Inc., since the acquisition of Sprint on April 1, 2020, is presented in the table below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended
June 30, 2020 | | Six Months Ended
September 30, 2020 | | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2020 |
| (in millions) | | |
| Total revenues | $ | 2 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 10 | |
| Operating loss | (15) | | | (17) | | | (15) | |
| Net loss | (819) | | | (1,651) | | | (2,229) | |
| Revenue from non-guarantors | 2 | | | 4 | | | 6 | |
| | | | | |
| Other income, net, from non-guarantors | 367 | | | 732 | | | 1,084 | |
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | Change |
| (in millions) | 2016 | | 2015 | $ | | % |
| Service revenues | $ | 2,023 |
| | $ | 1,669 |
| | $ | 354 |
| | 21 | % |
| Cost of equipment sales | 1,027 |
| | 720 |
| | 307 |
| | 43 | % |
| Selling, general and administrative | 868 |
| | 733 |
| | 135 |
| | 18 | % |
| Total comprehensive income | 24 |
| | 60 |
| | (36 | ) | | (60 | )% |
The change tosummarized balance sheet information for the consolidated obligor group of debt issued by Sprint Capital Corporation is presented in the table below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | June 30, 2020 | | September 30, 2020 | | December 31, 2020 |
| Current assets | $ | 1,619 | | | $ | 1,051 | | | $ | 2,646 | |
| Noncurrent assets | 58,547 | | | 34,540 | | | 35,330 | |
| Current liabilities | 4,788 | | | 3,388 | | | 4,281 | |
| Noncurrent liabilities | 70,070 | | | 66,530 | | | 70,253 | |
| | | | | |
| Due from non-guarantors | 58,276 | | | 34,259 | | | 35,046 | |
| Due to related parties | 6,025 | | | 4,774 | | | 4,786 | |
| Due from related parties | — | | | 5 | | | — | |
The summarized results of operations information for the consolidated obligor group of our Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries was primarily fromdebt issued by Sprint Capital Corporation, since the increasesacquisition of Sprint on April 1, 2020, is presented in Service revenues, Cost of equipment sales and Selling, general and administrative were primarily the result of an increase in activity of the non-guarantor subsidiary that provides device insurance, primarily driven by growth in our customer base. All other resultstable below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended
June 30, 2020 | | Six Months Ended
September 30, 2020 | | Nine Months Ended December 31, 2020 | | |
| (in millions) | | |
| Total revenues | $ | 2 | | | $ | 4 | | | $ | 10 | | | |
| Operating loss | (15) | | | (17) | | | (15) | | | |
| Net loss | (804) | | | (1,608) | | | (2,165) | | | |
| Revenue from non-guarantors | 2 | | | 4 | | | 6 | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Other income, net, from non-guarantors | 366 | | | 732 | | | 1,085 | | | |
| | | | | | | |
of operations of the Parent, Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries are substantially similar to the Company’s consolidated results of operations. See Note 16 – Guarantor Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
Performance Measures
In managing our business and assessing financial performance, we supplement the information provided by our financial statements with other operating or statistical data and non-GAAP financial measures. These operating and financial measures are utilized by our management to evaluate our operating performance and, in certain cases, our ability to meet liquidity requirements. Although companies in the wireless industry may not define each of these measures in precisely the same way, we believe that these measures facilitate comparisons with other companies in the wireless industry on key operating and financial measures.
Total The performance measures presented below include the impact of the Merger on a prospective basis from the close date of April 1, 2020. Historical results were not restated.
Customers
A customer is generally defined as a SIM number with a unique T-Mobile identifier which is associated with an account that generates revenue. Branded customers generally include customers thatCustomers are qualified either for postpaid service utilizing phones, mobile broadbandwearables, DIGITS or other connected devices, (including tablets), or DIGITS,which include tablets and SyncUp products, where they generally pay after receiving service, or prepaid service, where they generally pay in advance. Wholesaleadvance of receiving service. Our postpaid customers include M2Mcustomers of T-Mobile. Our prepaid customers include customers of T-Mobile and MVNO customers that operate on our network, but are managedMetro by wholesale partners.T-Mobile.
The following table sets forth the number of ending customers:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 | | 2017 Versus 2016 | | 2016 Versus 2015 |
| (in thousands) | # Change | | % Change | # Change | | % Change |
| Customers, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Branded postpaid phone customers (1) | 34,114 |
| | 31,297 |
| | 29,355 |
| | 2,817 |
| | 9 | % | | 1,942 |
| | 7 | % |
Branded postpaid other customers (1) | 3,933 |
| | 3,130 |
| | 2,340 |
| | 803 |
| | 26 | % | | 790 |
| | 34 | % |
| Total branded postpaid customers | 38,047 |
| | 34,427 |
| | 31,695 |
| | 3,620 |
| | 11 | % | | 2,732 |
| | 9 | % |
| Branded prepaid customers | 20,668 |
| | 19,813 |
| | 17,631 |
| | 855 |
| | 4 | % | | 2,182 |
| | 12 | % |
| Total branded customers | 58,715 |
| | 54,240 |
| | 49,326 |
| | 4,475 |
| | 8 | % | | 4,914 |
| | 10 | % |
Wholesale customers (2) | 13,870 |
| | 17,215 |
| | 13,956 |
| | (3,345 | ) | | (19 | )% | | 3,259 |
| | 23 | % |
| Total customers, end of period | 72,585 |
| | 71,455 |
| | 63,282 |
| | 1,130 |
| | 2 | % | | 8,173 |
| | 13 | % |
Adjustments to branded postpaid phone customers (3) | — |
| | (1,365 | ) | | — |
| | 1,365 |
| | (100 | )% | | (1,365 | ) | | NM |
|
Adjustments to branded prepaid customers (3) | — |
| | (326 | ) | | — |
| | 326 |
| | (100 | )% | | (326 | ) | | NM |
|
Adjustments to wholesale customers (3) | — |
| | 1,691 |
| | — |
| | (1,691 | ) | | (100 | )% | | 1,691 |
| | NM |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, | | 2020 Versus 2019 | | 2019 Versus 2018 |
| (in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | # | | % | | # | | % |
| Customers, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Postpaid phone customers (1) | 66,618 | | | 40,345 | | | 37,224 | | | 26,273 | | | 65 | % | | 3,121 | | | 8 | % |
Postpaid other customers (1) | 14,732 | | | 6,689 | | | 5,295 | | | 8,043 | | | 120 | % | | 1,394 | | | 26 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total postpaid customers | 81,350 | | | 47,034 | | | 42,519 | | | 34,316 | | | 73 | % | | 4,515 | | | 11 | % |
Prepaid customers (1),(2) | 20,714 | | | 20,860 | | | 21,137 | | | (146) | | | (1) | % | | (277) | | | (1) | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total customers | 102,064 | | | 67,894 | | | 63,656 | | | 34,170 | | | 50 | % | | 4,238 | | | 7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjustment to prepaid customers (2) | — | | | (616) | | | — | | | 616 | | | (100) | % | | (616) | | | NM |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NM - Not Meaningful
| |
(1) | During 2017, we retitled our “Branded postpaid mobile broadband customers” category to “Branded postpaid other customers” and reclassified DIGITS customers from our “Branded postpaid phone customers” category for the second quarter of 2017, when the DIGITS product was released. |
| |
(2) | We believe current and future regulatory changes have made the Lifeline program offered by our wholesale partners uneconomical. We will continue to support our wholesale partners offering the Lifeline program, but have excluded the Lifeline customers from our reported wholesale subscriber base resulting in the removal of 4,528,000 reported wholesale customers in 2017. |
| |
(3) | The MVNO Transaction resulted in a transfer of Branded postpaid phone customers and Branded prepaid customers to Wholesale customers on September 1, 2016. Prospectively from September 1, 2016, net customer additions for these customers are included within Wholesale customers. |
(1) Includes customers acquired in connection with the Merger and certain customer base adjustments. See Customer Base Adjustments and Net Customer Additions tables below.
Branded Customers(2) On July 18, 2019, we entered into an agreement whereby certain T-Mobile prepaid products will now be offered and distributed by a current MVNO partner. As a result, we included a base adjustment in the third quarter of 2019 to reduce prepaid customers by 616,000.
Total branded customers increased 4,475,000,34,170,000, or 8%50%, in 2017 primarily from:
•Higher branded postpaid phone customers, driven byprimarily due to customers acquired in the continued strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiativesMerger and promotional activities, the growing success of our business channel, T-Mobile for Business,new customer segments and rate plans and continued growth in existing and new markets, along with promotional activities; and
•Higher postpaid other customers, primarily due to customers acquired in the Merger and distribution expansiongrowth in other connected devices primarily related to new Greenfield markets,public and lower churn,educational sector customers and wearable products; partially offset by increased competitive activity in the marketplace with all competitors having launched Unlimited rate plans in the first quarter of 2017;
Higher branded•Lower prepaid customers, driven by the continued success of our Metro PCS brand and continued growth from distribution expansion, partially offset by the optimization of our third-party distribution channels; and
| |
• | Higher branded postpaid other customers primarily due to higher connected devicesand DIGITS.
|
Total branded customers increased 4,914,000, or 10%, in 2016 primarily from:
Higher branded prepaid customers driven by the success of our MetroPCS brand, continued growth in new markets and distribution expansion, partially offset by the optimization of our third-party distribution channels; and
Higher branded postpaid customers driven by strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives and promotional activities, partially offset by higher deactivations on a growing customer base.
Wholesale
Wholesale customers decreased 3,345,000, or 19%, primarily due to Lifeline subscribers, which were excluded from our reported wholesale subscriberthe customer base asadjustments made to align the customer reporting policies of the beginning of the second quarter of 2017. This decrease wasT-Mobile and Sprint, partially offset by the continued success of our prepaid business due to promotional activities and rate plan offers.
Customer Base Adjustments
Certain adjustments were made to align the customer reporting policies of T-Mobile and Sprint.
The adjustments made to the reported T-Mobile and Sprint ending customer base as of March 31, 2020, are presented below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Postpaid phone customers | | Postpaid other customers | | Total postpaid customers | | Prepaid customers | | Total customers |
| Reconciliation to beginning customers | | | | | | | | | |
| T-Mobile customers as reported, end of period March 31, 2020 | 40,797 | | | 7,014 | | | 47,811 | | | 20,732 | | | 68,543 | |
| Sprint customers as reported, end of period March 31, 2020 | 25,916 | | | 8,428 | | | 34,344 | | | 8,256 | | | 42,600 | |
| Total combined customers, end of period March 31, 2020 | 66,713 | | | 15,442 | | | 82,155 | | | 28,988 | | | 111,143 | |
| Adjustments | | | | | | | | | |
Reseller reclassification to wholesale customers (1) | (199) | | | (2,872) | | | (3,071) | | | — | | | (3,071) | |
EIP reclassification from postpaid to prepaid (2) | (963) | | | — | | | (963) | | | 963 | | | — | |
Divested prepaid customers (3) | — | | | — | | | — | | | (9,207) | | | (9,207) | |
Rate plan threshold (4) | (182) | | | (918) | | | (1,100) | | | — | | | (1,100) | |
Customers with non-phone devices (5) | (226) | | | 226 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Collection policy alignment (6) | (150) | | | (46) | | | (196) | | | — | | | (196) | |
Miscellaneous adjustments (7) | (141) | | | (43) | | | (184) | | | (302) | | | (486) | |
| Total Adjustments | (1,861) | | | (3,653) | | | (5,514) | | | (8,546) | | | (14,060) | |
| Adjusted beginning customers as of April 1, 2020 | 64,852 | | | 11,789 | | | 76,641 | | | 20,442 | | | 97,083 | |
(1) In connection with the closing of the Merger, we refined our definition of wholesale customers resulting in the reclassification of certain postpaid and prepaid reseller customers to wholesale customers. Starting with the three months ended March 31, 2020, we discontinued reporting wholesale customers to focus on postpaid and prepaid customers and wholesale revenues, which we consider more relevant than the number of wholesale customers given the expansion of M2M partnerships.and IoT products.
(2) Prepaid customers with a device installment billing plan historically included as Sprint postpaid customers have been reclassified to prepaid customers to align with T-Mobile policy.
Wholesale(3) Customers associated with the Sprint wireless prepaid and Boost Mobile brands that were divested on July 1, 2020, have been excluded from our reported customers.
(4) Customers who have rate plans with monthly recurring charges which are considered insignificant have been excluded from our reported customers.
(5) Customers with postpaid phone rate plans without a phone (e.g., non-phone devices) have been reclassified from postpaid phone to postpaid other customers increased 3,259,000, or 23%, in 2016 primarily due the continued successto align with T-Mobile policy.
(6) Certain Sprint customers subject to collection activity for an extended period of time have been excluded from our M2M partnerships and the MVNO transaction.reported customers to align with T-Mobile policy.
(7) Miscellaneous insignificant adjustments to align with T-Mobile policy.
Net Customer Additions
The following table sets forth the number of net customer additions:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | 2020 Versus 2019 | | 2019 Versus 2018 |
| (in thousands) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | # | | % | | # | | % |
| Net customer additions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Postpaid phone customers | | | | | | | | | 2,218 | | | 3,121 | | | 3,097 | | | (903) | | | (29) | % | | 24 | | | 1 | % |
| Postpaid other customers | | | | | | | | | 3,268 | | | 1,394 | | | 1,362 | | | 1,874 | | | 134 | % | | 32 | | | 2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total postpaid customers | | | | | | | | | 5,486 | | | 4,515 | | | 4,459 | | | 971 | | | 22 | % | | 56 | | | 1 | % |
Prepaid customers (1) | | | | | | | | | 145 | | | 339 | | | 460 | | | (194) | | | (57) | % | | (121) | | | (26) | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total customers | | | | | | | | | 5,631 | | | 4,854 | | | 4,919 | | | 777 | | | 16 | % | | (65) | | | (1) | % |
| Acquired customers, net of base adjustments | | | | | | | | | 29,228 | | | — | | | — | | | 29,228 | | | NM | | — | | | NM |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | 2017 Versus 2016 | | 2016 Versus 2015 |
| (in thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | # Change | | % Change | # Change | | % Change |
| Net customer additions | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Branded postpaid phone customers (1) | 2,817 |
| | 3,307 |
| | 3,511 |
| | (490 | ) | | (15 | )% | | (204 | ) | | (6 | )% |
Branded postpaid other customers (1) | 803 |
| | 790 |
| | 999 |
| | 13 |
| | 2 | % | | (209 | ) | | (21 | )% |
| Total branded postpaid customers | 3,620 |
| | 4,097 |
| | 4,510 |
| | (477 | ) | | (12 | )% | | (413 | ) | | (9 | )% |
| Branded prepaid customers | 855 |
| | 2,508 |
| | 1,315 |
| | (1,653 | ) | | (66 | )% | | 1,193 |
| | 91 | % |
| Total branded customers | 4,475 |
| | 6,605 |
| | 5,825 |
| | (2,130 | ) | | (32 | )% | | 780 |
| | 13 | % |
Wholesale customers (2) | 1,183 |
| | 1,568 |
| | 2,439 |
| | (385 | ) | | (25 | )% | | (871 | ) | | (36 | )% |
| Total net customer additions | 5,658 |
| | 8,173 |
| | 8,264 |
| | (2,515 | ) | | (31 | )% | | (91 | ) | | (1 | )% |
| |
(1) | During 2017, we retitled our “Branded postpaid mobile broadband customers” category to “Branded postpaid other customers” and reclassified DIGITS customer net additions from our “Branded postpaid phone customers” category for the second quarter of 2017, when the DIGITS product was released. |
| |
(2) | Net customer activity for Lifeline was excluded beginning in the second quarter of 2017 due to our determination based upon changes in the applicable government regulations that the Lifeline program offered by our wholesale partners is uneconomical. |
NM - Not Meaningful
Branded Customers(1) On July 18, 2019, we entered into an agreement whereby certain T-Mobile prepaid products will now be offered and distributed by a current MVNO partner. As a result, we included a base adjustment in the third quarter of 2019 to reduce prepaid customers by 616,000.
Total branded net customer additions decreased 2,130,000,increased 777,000, or 32%16%, in 2017 primarily from:
Lower branded prepaid net customer additions primarily due to higher deactivations from a growing customer base, increased competitive activity in the marketplace and de-emphasis of the T-Mobile prepaid brand. Additional decreases resulted from the optimization of our third-party distribution channels; and
Lower branded postpaid phone net customer additions primarily due to increased competitive activity in the marketplace partially offset by the continued strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives and promotional activities, the growing success of our business channel, T-Mobile for Business, continued growth in new markets and distribution expansion to new Greenfield markets, and lower churn; partially offset by
•Higher branded postpaid other net customer additions, primarily due to higher gross customer additions from connected devices, and DIGITS, offset by higher deactivations from a growing customer base.
Total branded net customer additions increased 780,000, or 13%, in 2016 primarily from:
Higher branded prepaid net customer additions primarily due to the success of our MetroPCS brand, continued growth in new marketspublic and distribution expansion,educational sector additions and lower churn, partially offset by an increaselower switching activity in the number of qualified branded prepaid customers migratingindustry from reduced store traffic due to branded postpaid plans;retail store closures arising from the Pandemic; partially offset by
•Lower branded postpaid mobile broadband net customer additions primarily due to higher deactivations resulting from churn on a growing branded postpaid mobile broadband customer base, partially offset by higher gross customer
additions; and
Lower branded postpaid phone net customer additions, primarily due to lower gross customer additionshigher churn from higher deactivations on a growing customer base, partially offset by lower churn as well as an increasecustomers acquired in the number of qualified brandedMerger and lower switching activity in the industry from reduced store traffic due to retail store closures arising from the Pandemic; and
•Lower prepaid customers migrating to branded postpaid plans as well as the optimization of our third-party distribution channels.
Wholesale
Wholesale net customer additions decreased 385,000, or 25%, in 2017 primarily from lower gross customer additions, partially offset by lower deactivations driven by the removal of the Lifeline program customers. While we continue to focus on more profitable wholesale opportunities, we believe current and future regulatory changes have made the Lifeline program offered by our wholesale partners uneconomical. We will continue to support our wholesale partners offering the Lifeline program, but have excluded the Lifeline customers from our reported wholesale subscriber base resulting in the removal of 4,528,000 reported wholesale customers in 2017.
Wholesale net customer additions decreased 871,000, or 36%, in 2016churn, both primarily due to higher MVNO deactivationslower switching activity in the industry from certain MVNO partners.reduced store traffic due to retail store closures arising from the Pandemic.
Customers Per Account
Customers per account is calculated by dividing the number of branded postpaid customers as of the end of the period by the number of branded postpaid accounts as of the end of the period. An account may include branded postpaid phone, mobile broadband, and DIGITS customers. We believe branded postpaid customers per account provides management, investors and analysts with useful information to evaluate our branded postpaid customer base on a per account basis.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 | | Change | | Change |
| # | | % | # | | % |
| Branded postpaid customers per account | 2.93 |
| | 2.86 |
| | 2.54 |
| | 0.07 |
| | 2 | % | | 0.32 |
| | 13 | % |
Branded postpaid customers per account increased 2% in 2017 primarily from promotions targeting families.
Branded postpaid customers per account increased 13% in 2016 primarily from growth of customers on family plan promotions and increased penetration of mobile broadband devices. In addition, the increase in 2016 was impacted by the MVNO Transaction.
Churn
Churn represents the number of customers whose service was disconnected as a percentage of the average number of customers during the specified period. The number of customers whose service was disconnected is presented net of customers that subsequently have their service restored within a certain period of time. We believe that churn provides management, investors and analysts with useful information to evaluate customer retention and loyalty. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | Bps Change 2017 Versus 2016 | | Bps Change 2016 Versus 2015 |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Branded postpaid phone churn | 1.18 | % | | 1.30 | % | | 1.39 | % | | -12 bps | | -9 bps |
| Branded prepaid churn | 4.04 | % | | 3.88 | % | | 4.45 | % | | 16 bps | | -57 bps |
The following table sets forth the churn:
Branded postpaid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | Bps Change 2020 Versus 2019 | | Bps Change 2019 Versus 2018 |
| | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | |
| Postpaid phone churn | | | | | | | 0.90 | % | | 0.89 | % | | 1.01 | % | | 1 bps | | -12 bps |
| Prepaid churn | | | | | | | 3.03 | % | | 3.82 | % | | 3.96 | % | | -79 bps | | -14 bps |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Postpaid phone churn decreased 12 basis points in 2017 primarily from:
The MVNO Transaction as the customers transferred had a higher rate of churn; and
Increased customer satisfaction and loyalty from ongoing improvements to network quality, customer service and the overall value of our offerings in the marketplace.
Branded postpaid phone churn decreased 9 basis points in 2016 primarily from:
The MVNO Transaction as the customers transferred had a higher rate of churn; and
Increased customer satisfaction and loyalty from ongoing improvements to network quality, customer service and the overall value of our offerings in the marketplace.
Branded prepaid churn increased 16 basis points in 2017was essentially flat, primarily due to the inclusion of the customer base acquired in the Merger with higher churn, from increased competitiveoffset by lower switching activity in the marketplace,industry due to reduced store traffic due to temporary retail store closures arising from the Pandemic.
Prepaid churn decreased 79 basis points, primarily due to lower switching activity in the industry due to reduced store traffic due to temporary retail store closures arising from the Pandemic and the continued success of our prepaid products due to promotional activities and rate plan offers.
Total Postpaid Accounts
A postpaid account is generally defined as a billing account number that generates revenue. Postpaid accounts are generally comprised of customers that are qualified for postpaid service utilizing phones, wearables, DIGITS or other connected devices which include tablets and SyncUp products, where they generally pay after receiving service.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, | | 2020 Versus 2019 | | 2019 Versus 2018 |
| (in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | # Change | | % Change | | # Change | | % Change |
| Accounts, end of period | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total postpaid customer accounts(1) | 25,754 | | | 15,047 | | | 14,015 | | | 10,707 | | | 71 | % | | 1,032 | | | 7 | % |
(1) Includes accounts acquired in connection with the Merger and certain account base adjustments. See Account Base Adjustments table below.
Total postpaid customer accounts increased 10,707,000, or 71%, primarily due to 10,150,000 accounts acquired in the Merger, the success of new customer segments and rate plans, continued growth in existing and new markets, along with promotional activities, improvements in network quality and industry-leading customer service, partially offset by increased customer satisfaction and loyalty from ongoing improvements to network quality, customer service and overall value of our offeringslower switching activity in the marketplace.industry from reduced store traffic due to retail store closures resulting from the Pandemic.
Branded prepaid churn decreased 57 basis points in 2016 primarily from:Account Base Adjustments
A decrease in certain customers, which have a higher rateCertain adjustments were made to align the account reporting policies of branded prepaid churn;T-Mobile and Sprint.
Strong performance
The adjustments made to the reported T-Mobile and Sprint ending account base as of March 31, 2020 are presented below:
| | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | | Postpaid Accounts |
| Reconciliation to beginning accounts | | |
| T-Mobile accounts as reported, end of period March 31, 2020 | | 15,244 | |
| Sprint accounts, end of period March 31, 2020 | | 11,246 | |
| Total combined accounts, end of period March 31, 2020 | | 26,490 | |
| Adjustments | | |
Reseller reclassification to wholesale accounts (1) | | (1) | |
EIP reclassification from postpaid to prepaid (2) | | (963) | |
Rate plan threshold (3) | | (18) | |
Collection policy alignment (4) | | (76) | |
Miscellaneous adjustments (5) | | (47) | |
| Total Adjustments | | (1,105) | |
| Adjusted beginning accounts as of April 1, 2020 | | 25,385 | |
(1) In connection with the closing of the MetroPCS brand; and
A methodology changeMerger, we refined our definition of wholesale accounts resulting in the third quarterreclassification of 2015certain postpaid and prepaid reseller accounts to wholesale accounts.
(2) Prepaid accounts with a customer with a device installment billing plan historically included as discussed below.Sprint postpaid accounts have been reclassified to prepaid accounts to align with T-Mobile policy.
During 2015, we had a methodology change that had no impact on(3) Accounts with customers who have rate plans with monthly recurring charges which are considered insignificant have been excluded from our reported branded prepaid ending customers or net customer additions, but resulted in computationally lower gross customer additions and deactivations.accounts.
(4) Certain Sprint accounts subject to collection activity for an extended period of time have been excluded from our reported accounts to align with T-Mobile policy.
(5) Miscellaneous insignificant adjustments to align with T-Mobile policy.
Average Revenue Per User Average Billings Per User
ARPU represents the average monthly service revenue earned from customers. We believe ARPU provides management, investors and analysts with useful information to assess and evaluate our service revenue realization per customer and assist in forecasting our future service revenues generated from our customer base. Branded postpaidPostpaid phone ARPU excludes mobile broadband and DIGITSpostpaid other customers and related revenues.revenues, which include wearables, DIGITS and other connected devices such as tablets and SyncUp products.
The following table illustrates the calculation of our operating measure ARPU and reconciles this measure to the related service revenues:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except average number of customers and ARPU) | | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | 2020 Versus 2019 | | 2019 Versus 2018 |
| | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | $ Change | | % Change | $ Change | | % Change |
| Calculation of Postpaid Phone ARPU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Postpaid service revenues | | | | | | | | | $ | 36,306 | | | $ | 22,673 | | | $ | 20,862 | | | $ | 13,633 | | | 60 | % | | $ | 1,811 | | | 9 | % |
| Less: Postpaid other revenues | | | | | | | | | (2,367) | | | (1,344) | | | (1,117) | | | (1,023) | | | 76 | % | | (227) | | | 20 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Postpaid phone service revenues | | | | | | | | | 33,939 | | | 21,329 | | | 19,745 | | | 12,610 | | | 59 | % | | 1,584 | | | 8 | % |
| Divided by: Average number of postpaid phone customers (in thousands) and number of months in period | | | | | | | | | 59,249 | | | 38,602 | | | 35,458 | | | 20,647 | | | 53 | % | | 3,144 | | | 9 | % |
| Postpaid phone ARPU | | | | | | | | | $ | 47.74 | | | $ | 46.04 | | | $ | 46.40 | | | $ | 1.70 | | | 4 | % | | $ | (0.36) | | | (1) | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Calculation of Prepaid ARPU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Prepaid service revenues | | | | | | | | | $ | 9,421 | | | $ | 9,543 | | | $ | 9,598 | | | $ | (122) | | | (1) | % | | $ | (55) | | | (1) | % |
| Divided by: Average number of prepaid customers (in thousands) and number of months in period | | | | | | | | | 20,594 | | | 20,955 | | | 20,761 | | | (361) | | | (2) | % | | 194 | | | 1 | % |
| Prepaid ARPU | | | | | | | | | $ | 38.12 | | | $ | 37.95 | | | $ | 38.53 | | | $ | 0.17 | | | — | % | | $ | (0.58) | | | (2) | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Postpaid Phone ARPU
Postpaid phone ARPU increased $1.70, or 4%, primarily due to:
•The net impact of customers acquired in the Merger, which have higher ARPU (net of changes arising from the reduction in base due to policy adjustments and reclassification of certain ARPU components from the acquired customers being moved to other revenue lines); and
•Higher premium service revenues; partially offset by
•An increase in our promotional activities.
Prepaid ARPU
Prepaid ARPU was essentially flat and was primarily impacted by:
•The impacts of certain adjustments to our customer base, including the removal of certain prepaid customers associated with products now offered and distributed by a current MVNO partner as those customers had lower ARPU; offset by
•Dilution from promotional rate plans; and
•A reduction in certain non-recurring charges.
Average BillingsRevenue Per UserAccount
Average Revenue per Account (“ABPU”ARPA”) represents the average monthly customer billings, including monthly lease revenues and EIP billings before securitization,postpaid service revenue earned per customer.account. We believe branded postpaid ABPUARPA provides management, investors and analysts with useful information to assess and evaluate average brandedour postpaid customer billings as it isservice revenue realization and assist in forecasting our future postpaid service revenues on a per account basis. We consider postpaid ARPA to be indicative of estimated cash collections,our revenue growth potential given the increase in the average number of postpaid phone customers per account and increases in postpaid other customers, including device financing payments, from our customers each month.wearables, DIGITS or other connected devices, which include tablets and SyncUp products.
The following tables illustratetable illustrates the calculation of our operating measures ARPUmeasure ARPA and ABPU and reconcile these measuresreconciles this measure to the related service revenues:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except average number of accounts, ARPA) | | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | 2020 Versus 2019 | | 2019 Versus 2018 |
| | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | $ Change | | % Change | $ Change | | % Change |
| Calculation of Postpaid ARPA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Postpaid service revenues | | | | | | | | | $ | 36,306 | | | $ | 22,673 | | | $ | 20,862 | | | $ | 13,633 | | | 60 | % | | $ | 1,811 | | | 9 | % |
| Divided by: Average number of postpaid accounts (in thousands) and number of months in period | | | | | | | | | 22,959 | | | 14,486 | | | 13,492 | | | 8,473 | | | 58 | % | | 994 | | | 7 | % |
| Postpaid ARPA | | | | | | | | | $ | 131.78 | | | $ | 130.43 | | | $ | 128.86 | | | $ | 1.35 | | | 1 | % | | $ | 1.57 | | | 1 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except average number of customers, ARPU and ABPU) | Year Ended December 31, | | 2017 Versus 2016 | | 2016 Versus 2015 |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | $ Change | | % Change | $ Change | | % Change |
| Calculation of Branded Postpaid Phone ARPU | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Branded postpaid service revenues | $ | 19,448 |
| | $ | 18,138 |
| | $ | 16,383 |
| | $ | 1,310 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 1,755 |
| | 11 | % |
| Less: Branded postpaid other revenues | (1,077 | ) | | (773 | ) | | (588 | ) | | (304 | ) | | 39 | % | | (185 | ) | | 31 | % |
| Branded postpaid phone service revenues | $ | 18,371 |
| | $ | 17,365 |
| | $ | 15,795 |
| | $ | 1,006 |
| | 6 | % | | $ | 1,570 |
| | 10 | % |
| Divided by: Average number of branded postpaid phone customers (in thousands) and number of months in period | 32,596 |
| | 30,484 |
| | 27,604 |
| | 2,112 |
| | 7 | % | | 2,880 |
| | 10 | % |
Branded postpaid phone ARPU (1) | $ | 46.97 |
| | $ | 47.47 |
| | $ | 47.68 |
| | $ | (0.50 | ) | | (1 | )% | | $ | (0.21 | ) | | — | % |
| | | | | | | |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
| Calculation of Branded Postpaid ABPU | | | | | | |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
| Branded postpaid service revenues | $ | 19,448 |
| | $ | 18,138 |
| | $ | 16,383 |
| | $ | 1,310 |
| | 7 | % | | $ | 1,755 |
| | 11 | % |
| EIP billings | 5,866 |
| | 5,432 |
| | 5,494 |
| | 434 |
| | 8 | % | | (62 | ) | | (1 | )% |
| Lease revenues | 877 |
| | 1,416 |
| | 224 |
| | (539 | ) | | (38 | )% | | 1,192 |
| | 532 | % |
| Total billings for branded postpaid customers | $ | 26,191 |
| | $ | 24,986 |
| | $ | 22,101 |
| | $ | 1,205 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 2,885 |
| | 13 | % |
| Divided by: Average number of branded postpaid customers (in thousands) and number of months in period | 36,079 |
| | 33,184 |
| | 29,341 |
| | 2,895 |
| | 9 | % | | 3,843 |
| | 13 | % |
| Branded postpaid ABPU | $ | 60.49 |
| | $ | 62.75 |
| | $ | 62.77 |
| | $ | (2.26 | ) | | (4 | )% | | $ | (0.02 | ) | | — | % |
| | | | | | | |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
| Calculation of Branded Prepaid ARPU | | | | | | |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
| Branded prepaid service revenues | $ | 9,380 |
| | $ | 8,553 |
| | $ | 7,553 |
| | $ | 827 |
| | 10 | % | | $ | 1,000 |
| | 13 | % |
| Divided by: Average number of branded prepaid customers (in thousands) and number of months in period | 20,204 |
| | 18,797 |
| | 16,704 |
| | 1,407 |
| | 7 | % | | 2,093 |
| | 13 | % |
| Branded prepaid ARPU | $ | 38.69 |
| | $ | 37.92 |
| | $ | 37.68 |
| | $ | 0.77 |
| | 2 | % | | $ | 0.24 |
| | 1 | % |
| |
(1) | Branded postpaid phone ARPU includes the reclassification of 43,000 DIGITS average customers and related revenue to the “Branded postpaid other customers” category for the second quarter of 2017. |
Postpaid ARPA
Branded
Postpaid Phone ARPU
Branded postpaid phone ARPU decreased $0.50,ARPA increased $1.35, or 1%, primarily due to:
•An increase in 2017 primarily from:customers per account, including further penetration in connected devices, and the success of new customer segments and rate plans;
•Higher premium service revenues; and
Dilution from promotions targeting families and new segments; and
•The negativenet impact from hurricanes of approximately $0.09;customers acquired in the Merger; partially offset by
The MVNO Transaction as those customers had a lower ARPU; and
A decrease in the non-cash net revenue deferral for Data Stash.
Under existing revenue standards, T-Mobile continues to expect that Branded postpaid phone ARPU in full-year 2018 will be generally stable compared to full-year 2017, with some quarterly variations.
We adopted ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”), as amended, on January 1, 2018. Adoption of the standard will impact the timing, amount and allocation of our revenue and is expected to impact ARPU. We will provide additional disclosures comparing results to previous GAAP•An increase in our 2018 consolidated financial statements. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding recently issued accounting standards.
Branded postpaid phone ARPU decreased $0.21 in 2016 primarily from:
Decreases due to an increase in the non-cash net revenue deferral for Data Stash; and
Dilution from promotional activities; partially offset byand
Higher data attach rates;
The positive impact•A reduction in certain non-recurring charges, including from our T-Mobile ONE rate plans prior to the release of Un-carrier Next in 2017 which began including taxes and fees;
The transfer of customers as part of the MVNO Transaction as those customers had lower ARPU;
Continued growth of our insurance programs; and
Higher regulatory program revenues.
Branded Postpaid ABPU
Branded postpaid ABPU decreased $2.26, or 4%, in 2017 primarily from:
Lower lease revenues;
Growth in the branded postpaid other customer base with lower ARPU; and
The negative impact from hurricanes of approximately $0.08.
Branded postpaid ABPU decreased $0.02 in 2016 primarily from:
Lower EIP billings due to the impact of our JUMP! On Demand program launched at the end of the second quarter of 2015;Pandemic.
Lower branded postpaid phone ARPU, as described above; and
Dilution from increased penetration of mobile broadband devices; partially offset by
An increase in lease revenues.
Branded Prepaid ARPU
Branded prepaid ARPU increased $0.77, or 2%, in 2017 primarily from:
Continued growth of MetroPCS customers who generate higher ARPU; and
The optimization of our third-party distribution channels; partially offset by
The negative impact from hurricanes of approximately $0.05.
Branded prepaid ARPU increased $0.24, or 1%, in 2016 primarily from:
A decrease in certain customers that had lower average branded prepaid ARPU, as well as higher data attach rates; partially offset by
Dilution from growth of customers on rate plan promotions.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA represents earnings before Interest expense, net of Interest income, Income tax expense, Depreciation and amortization, non-cash Stock-based compensation and certain income and expenses not reflective of T-Mobile’sour ongoing operating performance. Net income margin represents Net income divided by Service revenues. Adjusted EBITDA margin represents Adjusted EBITDA divided by Service revenues.
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure utilized by our management to monitor the financial performance of our operations. We use Adjusted EBITDA internally as a metricmeasure to evaluate and compensate our personnel and management for their performance, and as a benchmark to evaluate our operating performance in comparison to our competitors. Management believes analysts and investors use Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental measure to evaluate overall operating performance and facilitate comparisons with other wireless communications services companies because it is indicative of our ongoing operating performance and trends by excluding the impact of interest expense from financing, non-cash depreciation and amortization from capital investments, non-cash stock-based compensation, Merger-related costs including network decommissioning costs, incremental costs directly attributable to COVID-19 and impairment expense, as they are not indicative of our ongoing operating performance, andas well as certain other nonrecurring income and expenses. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for income from operations, net income or any other measure of financial performance reported in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).
The following table illustrates the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and reconciles Adjusted EBITDA to Net income, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | 2020 Versus 2019 | | 2019 Versus 2018 |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | $ Change | | % Change | $ Change | | % Change |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | $ | 3,064 | | | $ | 3,468 | | | $ | 2,888 | | | $ | (404) | | | (12) | % | | $ | 580 | | | 20 | % |
| Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | | | | | | | (320) | | | — | | | — | | | (320) | | | NM | | — | | | NM |
| Income from continuing operations | | | | | | | | | 2,744 | | | 3,468 | | | 2,888 | | | (724) | | | (21) | % | | 580 | | | 20 | % |
| Interest expense | | | | | | | | | 2,483 | | | 727 | | | 835 | | | 1,756 | | | 242 | % | | (108) | | | (13) | % |
| Interest expense to affiliates | | | | | | | | | 247 | | | 408 | | | 522 | | | (161) | | | (39) | % | | (114) | | | (22) | % |
| Interest income | | | | | | | | | (29) | | | (24) | | | (19) | | | (5) | | | 21 | % | | (5) | | | 26 | % |
| Other expense, net | | | | | | | | | 405 | | | 8 | | | 54 | | | 397 | | | 4,963 | % | | (46) | | | (85) | % |
| Income tax expense | | | | | | | | | 786 | | | 1,135 | | | 1,029 | | | (349) | | | (31) | % | | 106 | | | 10 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating income | | | | | | | | | 6,636 | | | 5,722 | | | 5,309 | | | 914 | | | 16 | % | | 413 | | | 8 | % |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | | | | | 14,151 | | | 6,616 | | | 6,486 | | | 7,535 | | | 114 | % | | 130 | | | 2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income from discontinued operations (1) | | | | | | | | | 432 | | | — | | | — | | | 432 | | | NM | | — | | | NM |
Stock-based compensation (2) | | | | | | | | | 516 | | | 423 | | | 389 | | | 93 | | | 22 | % | | 34 | | | 9 | % |
| Merger-related costs | | | | | | | | | 1,915 | | | 620 | | | 196 | | | 1,295 | | | 209 | % | | 424 | | | 216 | % |
| COVID-19-related costs | | | | | | | | | 458 | | | — | | | — | | | 458 | | | NM | | — | | | NM |
| Impairment expense | | | | | | | | | 418 | | | — | | | — | | | 418 | | | NM | | — | | | NM |
Other, net (3) | | | | | | | | | 31 | | | 2 | | | 18 | | | 29 | | | 1,450 | % | | (16) | | | (89) | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | | | | | | | | | $ | 24,557 | | | $ | 13,383 | | | $ | 12,398 | | | $ | 11,174 | | | 83 | % | | $ | 985 | | | 8 | % |
| Net income margin (Net income divided by Service revenues) | | | | | | | | | 6 | % | | 10 | % | | 9 | % | | | | -400 bps | | | | 100 bps |
| Adjusted EBITDA margin (Adjusted EBITDA divided by Service revenues) | | | | | | | | | 49 | % | | 39 | % | | 38 | % | | | | 1,000 bps | | | | 100 bps |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | 2017 Versus 2016 | | 2016 Versus 2015 |
| (in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | $ Change | | % Change | $ Change | | % Change |
| Net income | $ | 4,536 |
| | $ | 1,460 |
| | $ | 733 |
| | $ | 3,076 |
| | 211 | % | | $ | 727 |
| | 99 | % |
| Adjustments: | | | | | | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Interest expense | 1,111 |
| | 1,418 |
| | 1,085 |
| | (307 | ) | | (22 | )% | | 333 |
| | 31 | % |
| Interest expense to affiliates | 560 |
| | 312 |
| | 411 |
| | 248 |
| | 79 | % | | (99 | ) | | (24 | )% |
Interest income (1) | (17 | ) | | (13 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (4 | ) | | 31 | % | | (7 | ) | | 117 | % |
| Other (income) expense, net | 73 |
| | 6 |
| | 11 |
| | 67 |
| | 1,117 | % | | (5 | ) | | (45 | )% |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | (1,375 | ) | | 867 |
| | 245 |
| | (2,242 | ) | | (259 | )% | | 622 |
| | 254 | % |
Operating income (1) | 4,888 |
| | 4,050 |
| | 2,479 |
| | 838 |
| | 21 | % | | 1,571 |
| | 63 | % |
| Depreciation and amortization | 5,984 |
| | 6,243 |
| | 4,688 |
| | (259 | ) | | (4 | )% | | 1,555 |
| | 33 | % |
Cost of MetroPCS business combination (2) | — |
| | 104 |
| | 376 |
| | (104 | ) | | (100 | )% | | (272 | ) | | (72 | )% |
Stock-based compensation (3) | 307 |
| | 235 |
| | 222 |
| | 72 |
| | 31 | % | | 13 |
| | 6 | % |
Other, net (4) | 34 |
| | 7 |
| | 42 |
| | 27 |
| | 386 | % | | (35 | ) | | (83 | )% |
Adjusted EBITDA (1) | $ | 11,213 |
| | $ | 10,639 |
| | $ | 7,807 |
| | $ | 574 |
| | 5 | % | | $ | 2,832 |
| | 36 | % |
| Net income margin (Net income divided by service revenues) | 15 | % | | 5 | % | | 3 | % | |
|
| | 1000 bps |
| | | | 200 bps |
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin (Adjusted EBITDA divided by service revenues) (1) | 37 | % | | 38 | % | | 31 | % | |
|
| | -100 bps |
| | | | 700 bps |
|
| |
(1) | The amortized imputed discount on EIP receivables previously recognized as Interest income has been retrospectively re-classified as Other revenues. See the table below and Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information. |
| |
(2) | Beginning in the first quarter of 2017, the Company will no longer separately present Cost of MetroPCS business combination as it is insignificant. |
| |
(3) | Stock-based compensation includes payroll tax impacts and may not agree to stock-based compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements. |
| |
(4) | (1)Following the Prepaid Transaction, starting on July 1, 2020, we provide MVNO services to DISH. We have included the operating income from discontinued operations from April 1, 2020 through June 30, 2020, in our determination of Adjusted EBITDA to reflect contributions of the Prepaid Business that were replaced by the MVNO Agreement beginning on July 1, 2020 in order to enable management, analysts and investors to better assess ongoing operating performance and trends. (2)Stock-based compensation includes payroll tax impacts and may not agree to stock-based compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, certain stock-based compensation expenses associated with the Transactions have been included in Merger-related costs. (3)Other, net may not agree to the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income primarily due to certain non-routine operating activities, such as other special items that would not be expected to reoccur, and are therefore excluded in Adjusted EBITDA. |
Adjusted EBITDA increased $574 million, or 5%, in 2017 primarily from:
An increase in branded postpaid and prepaid service revenues primarily due to strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives, the ongoing success of our promotional activities, and the continued strength of our MetroPCS brand;
Higher wholesale revenues; and
Higher other revenues; partially offset by
Higher selling, general and administrative expenses;
Lower gains on disposal of spectrum licenses of $600 million; gains on disposal were $235 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $835 million in the same period in 2016;
Higher cost of services expense;
Higher net losses on equipment; and
The negative impact from hurricanes of approximately $201 million, net of insurance recoveries.
Adjusted EBITDA increased $2.8 billion, or 36%, in 2016 primarily from:
Increased branded postpaid and prepaid service revenues primarily due to strong customer response to our Un-carrier initiatives and the ongoing success of our promotional activities;
Higher gains on disposal of spectrum licenses of $672 million; gains on disposal were $835 million in 2016 compared to $163 million in 2015;
Lower losses on equipment; and
Focused cost control and synergies realized from the MetroPCS business combination, primarily in cost of services; partially offset by
Higher selling, general and administrative.
Effective January 1, 2017, the imputed discount on EIP receivables, which was previously recognized within Interest income in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income is recognized within Other revenues in our Consolidated Statementsprimarily due to certain non-routine operating activities, such as other special items that would not be expected to reoccur or are not reflective of Comprehensive Income. Due to this presentation, the imputed discount on EIP receivables is includedT-Mobile’s ongoing operating performance, and are therefore excluded in Adjusted EBITDA. See Note 1 - Summary
Adjusted EBITDA increased $11.2 billion, or 83%. The components comprising Adjusted EBITDA are discussed further above. The increase was primarily due to:
•Higher Total service revenues; and
•Higher Equipment revenues; partially offset by
•Higher Cost of Significant Accounting Policiesservices expenses, excluding Merger-related costs;
•Higher Cost of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.equipment sales; and
•Higher Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding Merger-related costs and supplemental employee payroll, third-party commissions and cleaning-related COVID-19 costs.
We have applied this change retrospectively and presented the effect on the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, in the table below.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2016 | | Year Ended December 31, 2015 |
| (in millions) | As Filed | | Change in Accounting Principle | | As Adjusted | | As Filed | | Change in Accounting Principle | | As Adjusted |
| Operating income | $ | 3,802 |
| | $ | 248 |
| | $ | 4,050 |
| | $ | 2,065 |
| | $ | 414 |
| | $ | 2,479 |
|
| Interest income | 261 |
| | (248 | ) | | 13 |
| | 420 |
| | (414 | ) | | 6 |
|
| Net income | 1,460 |
| | — |
| | 1,460 |
| | 733 |
| | — |
| | 733 |
|
| Net income as a percentage of service revenue | 5 | % | | — | % | | 5 | % | | 3 | % | | — | % | | 3 | % |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 10,391 |
| | $ | 248 |
| | $ | 10,639 |
| | $ | 7,393 |
| | $ | 414 |
| | $ | 7,807 |
|
| Adjusted EBITDA margin (Adjusted EBITDA divided by service revenues) | 37 | % | | 1 | % | | 38 | % | | 30 | % | | 1 | % | | 31 | % |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operations, proceeds from issuance of long-term debt and common stock, capitalfinancing leases, the sale of certain receivables, financing arrangements of vendor payables which effectively extend payment terms and securedthe New Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below). In connection with the closing of the Merger on April 1, 2020, we incurred a substantial amount of additional third-party indebtedness which increased our future financial commitments, including aggregate interest payments. Further, the incurrence of additional indebtedness may inhibit our ability to incur new debt under the terms governing our existing and unsecured revolving credit facilities with DT.future indebtedness, which
may make it more difficult for us to incur new debt in the future to finance our business strategy. See “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Indebtedness.”
Cash Flows
The following is an analysisa condensed schedule of our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015:2018:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | 2020 Versus 2019 | | 2019 Versus 2018 |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ | | % | | $ | | % |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | | | | | | | | $ | 8,640 | | | $ | 6,824 | | | $ | 3,899 | | | $ | 1,816 | | | 27 | % | | $ | 2,925 | | | 75 | % |
| Net cash used in investing activities | | | | | | | | | (12,715) | | | (4,125) | | | (579) | | | (8,590) | | | 208 | % | | (3,546) | | | 612 | % |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | | | | | | | 13,010 | | | (2,374) | | | (3,336) | | | 15,384 | | | (648) | % | | 962 | | | (29) | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | 2017 Versus 2016 | | 2016 Versus 2015 |
| (in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 7,962 |
| | $ | 6,135 |
| | $ | 5,414 |
| | $ | 1,827 |
| | 30 | % | | $ | 721 |
| | 13 | % |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (11,064 | ) | | (5,680 | ) | | (9,560 | ) | | (5,384 | ) | | 95 | % | | 3,880 |
| | (41 | )% |
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (1,179 | ) | | 463 |
| | 3,413 |
| | (1,642 | ) | | (355 | )% | | (2,950 | ) | | (86 | )% |
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $1.8 billion, or 30%27%, in 2017 primarily from:
$3.1 billion increase in Net income;
$2.0 billion decrease in net non-cash adjustments to•Higher Net income, primarily due to changes in Deferred income tax expense and Depreciation and amortization, partially offset by Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses; and
$757 million decrease in net cash outflows from changes in working capital primarily due to improvements in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, Deferred purchase price from sales of receivables and Accounts receivable, partially offset by changes in Equipment installment plan receivables and Other current and long-term assets and liabilities.The change in EIP receivables was primarily due to a decrease in net cash proceeds from the sale of EIP receivables as the year ended December 31, 2016 benefited from net cash proceeds of $361 million related to upsizing of the EIP securitization facility.
Cash provided by operating activities increased $721 million, or 13%, in 2016 primarily from:
$727 million increase in Net income;
$1.4 billion increase in netexcluding non-cash income and expenses included in Net income primarily due to changes in Depreciation and amortization, Deferred income tax expense and Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses;expenses; partially offset by
$1.4•A $6.3 billion increase in net cash outflows from changes in working capital, primarily due to changesthe one-time impact of $2.3 billion in gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps related to Merger financing for the year ended December 31, 2020, included in the use of cash from Other current and long-term liabilities, as well as higher use of cash from Accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $1.9 billion as well as the change in Equipment installment plan receivables, including inflows from the sale of certain EIP receivables, partially offset by the change inand Inventories.
•Net cash used for Accounts payable and accrued liabilities was $1.2 billion in 2016 as compared to net cash provided by Accounts payableoperating activities includes $1.5 billion and accrued liabilities of $693$442 million in 2015. payments for Merger-related costs for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
•Net cash proceeds from the sale of EIP and service receivables was $536provided by operating activities includes $458 million in 2016 as compared to $884 million in 2015.payments for supplemental employee payroll, third-party commissions and cleaning-related COVID-19 costs for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased $5.4$8.6 billion, or 95%, in 2017208%. The use of cash was primarily from:
A $3.0•$11.0 billion decreasein SalesPurchases of short-term investments;
property and equipment, including capitalized interest, from network integration related to the Merger and the continued build-out of our nationwide 5G network;A $1.9•$5.0 billion increase in cash paid for the acquisition of Sprint, net of cash and restricted cash acquired; and
•$1.3 billion in Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits,deposits; partially offset by
•$3.1 billion in Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions;
•$1.2 billion in Proceeds from the divestiture of prepaid business; and
•$632 million related to derivative contracts under collateral exchange arrangements, for more information regarding these contracts, see Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities increased $15.4 billion. The source of cash was primarily from:
•$35.3 billion in Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, net of discounts and issuance costs, driven primarily by the issuance of $31.8 billion in Senior Secured Notes and a draw of $4.0 billion on the New Secured Term Loan Facility;
•$18.7 billion in Proceeds from the issuance of short-term debt, net of discounts and issuance costs, driven by our winning bid for 1,525 licenses ina $19.0 billion draw on the 600 MHz spectrum auction during the second quarter of 2017; and
A $535 million increase in Purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest primarily driven by growth in network build as we continued deployment of low band spectrum, including beginning deployment of 600 MHz.
Cash used in investing activities decreased $3.9 billion, or 41%, in 2016, to a use of $5.7 billion primarily from:
$4.7 billion for Purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of $142 million primarily related to the build-out of our 4G LTE network;
$4.0 billion for Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including a $2.2 billion deposit made to a third partyNew Secured Bridge Loan Facility in connection with a potential asset purchase;the closing of the Merger; and
•$3.020.4 billion in Sales of short-term investments.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in and provided by financing activities changed by $1.6 billion to a use of $1.2 billion, in 2017 primarily from:
$10.2 billion for Repayments of long-term debt;debt driven by the repayment of $5.3 billion aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes held by DT, our $4.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility with DT, our $4.0 billion New Secured Term Loan Facility, $2.3 billion of outstanding principal for the termination of the accounts receivable facility assumed in the Merger, $4.2 billion aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes held by third parties and $656 million
$2.9 billion for Repaymentsaggregate principal amount of our revolving credit facility;
3.360% Senior Secured Series 2016-1 A-1 Notes due 2021;•$486 million for Repayments of capital lease obligations;
$427 million for Repurchases of common shares; and
$300 million for 18.9 billion in Repayments of short-term debt, net of refunds for purchasesissuance costs, for the repayment of inventory, propertythe $19.0 billion draw on the New Secured Bridge Loan Facility; and equipment, net; partially offset by
•$10.5 billion in Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt; and
$2.9 billion in Proceeds from borrowing on our revolving credit facility.
Cash provided by financing activities decreased $3.01.0 billion or 86%, in 2016, to an inflow of $463 million primarily from:
$997 million in Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt; partially offset by
$205 million for Repayments of capitalfinancing lease obligations;obligations.
$150 million for Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net; and
$121 million for Tax withholdings on share-based awards.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
As of December 31, 2017,2020, our Cash and cash equivalents were $1.2 billion.$10.4 billion compared to $1.5 billion at December 31, 2019.
Free Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow represents netNet cash provided by operating activities less cash payments for purchasesPurchases of property and equipment.equipment, including Proceeds from sales of tower sites and Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions, less Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment. Free Cash Flow is aand Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps, are non-GAAP financial measuremeasures utilized by our management, investors and analysts of T-Mobile’sour financial information to evaluate cash available to pay debt and provide further investment in the business.
The following table illustrates the calculationbelow provides reconciliations of Free Cash Flow and reconciles Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps to Net cash provided by operating activities, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure:measure.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | 2020 Versus 2019 | | 2019 Versus 2018 |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ | | % | $ Change | | % Change |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | | | | | | | | $ | 8,640 | | | $ | 6,824 | | | $ | 3,899 | | | $ | 1,816 | | | 27 | % | | $ | 2,925 | | | 75 | % |
| Cash purchases of property and equipment | | | | | | | | | (11,034) | | | (6,391) | | | (5,541) | | | (4,643) | | | 73 | % | | (850) | | | 15 | % |
| Proceeds from sales of tower sites | | | | | | | | | — | | | 38 | | | — | | | (38) | | | (100) | % | | 38 | | | NM |
| Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions | | | | | | | | | 3,134 | | | 3,876 | | | 5,406 | | | (742) | | | (19) | % | | (1,530) | | | (28) | % |
| Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs | | | | | | | | | (82) | | | (28) | | | (212) | | | (54) | | | 193 | % | | 184 | | | (87) | % |
| Free Cash Flow | | | | | | | | | 658 | | | 4,319 | | | 3,552 | | | (3,661) | | | (85) | % | | 767 | | | 22 | % |
| Gross cash paid for the settlement of interest rate swaps | | | | | | | | | 2,343 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,343 | | | NM | | — | | | NM |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps | | | | | | | | | $ | 3,001 | | | $ | 4,319 | | | $ | 3,552 | | | $ | (1,318) | | | (31) | % | | $ | 767 | | | 22 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | 2017 Versus 2016 | | 2016 Versus 2015 |
| (in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | $ Change | | % Change | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 7,962 |
| | $ | 6,135 |
| | $ | 5,414 |
| | $ | 1,827 |
| | 30 | % | | $ | 721 |
| | 13 | % |
| Cash purchases of property and equipment | (5,237 | ) | | (4,702 | ) | | (4,724 | ) | | (535 | ) | | 11 | % | | 22 |
| | — | % |
| Free Cash Flow | $ | 2,725 |
| | $ | 1,433 |
| | $ | 690 |
| | $ | 1,292 |
| | 90 | % | | $ | 743 |
| | 108 | % |
Free Cash Flow, increasedexcluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps related to Merger financing, decreased $1.3 billion, in 2017or 31%. The decrease was primarily from:impacted by the following:
•Higher netCash purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of $440 million and $473 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, from network integration related to the Merger and the continued build-out of our nationwide 5G network; and
•Lower Proceeds related to our deferred purchase price from securitization transactions; partially offset by
•Higher Net cash provided by operating activities, as described above; partially offset by
Higher purchases of property and equipment primarily due to growth in network build as we deployed 700 MHz spectrum and began to deploy 600 MHz. Cash purchases of property and equipment includes capitalized interest of $136 million and $142 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Free Cash Flow increased $743 million in 2016 primarily from:
Higher netabove. Net cash provided by operating activities as described above; andwas impacted by the following:
Lower purchases of property and equipment from the build-out of our 4G LTE network in 2016, as described above. Cash purchases of property and equipment includes capitalized interest of $142 million and $246 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively.
We adopted ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” on January 1, 2018. The standard will require a retrospective approach and impact the presentation of cash flows related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions, which is the deferred purchase price, resulting in a reclassification of cash
inflows from Operating activities to Investing activities of approximately $4.3•$1.5 billion and $3.5 billion$442 million in payments for Merger-related costs for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively,2019, respectively.
•$458 million in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The standard will also impact the presentation of cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishmentsupplemental employee payroll, third-party commissions and cleaning-related COVID-19 costs resulting in a reclassification of cash outflows from Operating activities to Financing activities of $188 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, in our consolidated financial statements. In the first quarter2020.
•The calculation of 2018, we plan to redefine Free Cash Flow, to reflectexcluding gross payments for the above changes in classification and present cash flows on a consistent basissettlement of interest rate swaps, excludes the one-time impact of gross payments for investor transparency. See Note 1 - Summarythe settlement of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding recently issued accounting standards.
Debt
As of December 31, 2017, our total debt was $28.3 billion, excluding our tower obligations, of which $26.7 billion was classified as long-term debt. Significant debt-related activity during 2017 included:
Debt to Third Parties
Issuances and Borrowings
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued the following Senior Notes:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Principal Issuances | | Issuance Costs | | Net Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Debt |
| 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 | $ | 500 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 498 |
|
| 5.125% Senior Notes due 2025 | 500 |
| | 2 |
| | 498 |
|
| 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027 | 500 |
| | 1 |
| | 499 |
|
| Total of Senior Notes issued | $ | 1,500 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 1,495 |
|
On March 16, 2017, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued a total of $1.5 billion of public Senior Notes with various interest rates and maturity dates. Issuance costsrate swaps related to the public debt issuance totaled $5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. We used the net proceedsMerger financing of $1.495 billion from the transaction to redeem callable high yield debt.
On January 25, 2018, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, (i) issued $1.0 billion of public 4.500% Senior Notes due 2026 and (ii) issued $1.5 billion of public 4.750% Senior Notes due 2028. We intend to use the net proceeds of $2.493 billion from the transaction to redeem up to $1.75 billion of 6.625% Senior Notes due 2023, and up to $600 million of 6.836% Senior Notes due 2023, with the balance to be used for general corporate purposes, including partial pay down of borrowings under our revolving credit facility with DT. Issuance costs related to the public debt issuance totaled approximately $7 million.
Notes Redemptions
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we made the following note redemptions:$2.3 billion.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Principal Amount | | Write-off of Premiums, Discounts and Issuance Costs (1) | | Call Penalties (1) (2) | | Redemption
Date | | Redemption Price |
| 6.625% Senior Notes due 2020 | $ | 1,000 |
| | $ | (45 | ) | | $ | 22 |
| | February 10, 2017 | | 102.208 | % |
| 5.250% Senior Notes due 2018 | 500 |
| | 1 |
| | 7 |
| | March 4, 2017 | | 101.313 | % |
| 6.250% Senior Notes due 2021 | 1,750 |
| | (71 | ) | | 55 |
| | April 1, 2017 | | 103.125 | % |
| 6.464% Senior Notes due 2019 | 1,250 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | April 28, 2017 | | 100.000 | % |
| 6.542% Senior Notes due 2020 | 1,250 |
| | — |
| | 21 |
| | April 28, 2017 | | 101.636 | % |
| 6.633% Senior Notes due 2021 | 1,250 |
| | — |
| | 41 |
| | April 28, 2017 | | 103.317 | % |
| 6.731% Senior Notes due 2022 | 1,250 |
| | — |
| | 42 |
| | April 28, 2017 | | 103.366 | % |
| Total note redemptions | $ | 8,250 |
| | $ | (115 | ) | | $ | 188 |
| | | | |
| |
(1) | Write-off of premiums, discounts, issuance costs and call penalties are included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Write-off of premiums, discounts and issuance costs are included in Other, net within Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. |
| |
(2) | The call penalty is the excess paid over the principal amount. Call penalties are included within Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. |
Prior to December 31, 2017, we delivered a notice of redemption on $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of our 6.125% Senior Notes due 2022. The notes were redeemed on January 15, 2018, at a redemption price equal to 103.063% of the principal amount of the notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon). The redemption premium was approximately $31 million and the write-off of issuance costs was approximately $1 million. The outstanding principal amount was reclassified from Long-term debt to Short-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017.Borrowing Capacity
Debt to Affiliates
Issuances and Borrowings
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we made the following borrowings:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Net Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Debt | | Extinguishments | | Write-off of Discounts and Issuance Costs (1) |
| LIBOR plus 2.00% Senior Secured Term Loan due 2022 | $ | 2,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| LIBOR plus 2.00% Senior Secured Term Loan due 2024 | 2,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
LIBOR plus 2.750% Senior Secured Term Loan (2) | — |
| | (1,980 | ) | | 13 |
|
| Total | $ | 4,000 |
| | $ | (1,980 | ) | | $ | 13 |
|
| |
(1) | Write-off of discounts and issuance costs are included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and Other, net within Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. |
| |
(2) | Our Senior Secured Term Loan extinguished during the year endedDecember 31, 2017 was Third Party debt.
|
On January 25, 2017, T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile USA”), and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, entered into an agreement to borrow $4.0 billion under a secured term loan facility (“Incremental Term Loan Facility”) with DT, our majority stockholder, to refinance $1.98 billion of outstanding senior secured term loans under its Term Loan Credit Agreement dated November 9, 2015, with the remaining net proceeds from the transaction used to redeem callable high yield debt. The Incremental Term Loan Facility increased DT’s incremental term loan commitment provided to T-Mobile USA under that certain First Incremental Facility Amendment dated as of December 29, 2016, from $660 million to $2.0 billion and provided T-Mobile USA with an additional $2.0 billion incremental term loan commitment.
On January 31, 2017, the loans under the Incremental Term Loan Facility were drawn in two tranches: (i) $2.0 billion of which bears interest at a rate equal to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00% and matures on November 9, 2022, and (ii) $2.0 billion of which bears interest at a rate equal to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.25% and matures on January 31, 2024. In July 2017, we repriced the $2.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility maturing on January 31, 2024, with DT by reducing the interest rate to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00%. No issuance fees were incurred related to this debt agreement for the year ended December 31, 2017.
On March 31, 2017, the Incremental Term Loan Facility was amended to waive all interim principal payments. The outstanding principal balance will be due at maturity.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued the following Senior Notes to DT:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Principal Issuances (Redemptions) | | Discounts (1) | | Net Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Debt |
| 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 | $ | 1,000 |
| | $ | (23 | ) | | $ | 977 |
|
| 5.125% Senior Notes due 2025 | 1,250 |
| | (28 | ) | | 1,222 |
|
5.375% Senior Notes due 2027 (2) | 1,250 |
| | (28 | ) | | 1,222 |
|
| 6.288% Senior Reset Notes due 2019 | (1,250 | ) | | — |
| | (1,250 | ) |
| 6.366% Senior Reset Notes due 2020 | (1,250 | ) | | — |
| | (1,250 | ) |
| Total | $ | 1,000 |
| | $ | (79 | ) | | $ | 921 |
|
| |
(1) | Discounts reduce Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt and are included within Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. |
| |
(2) | In April 2017, we issued to DT $750 million in aggregate principal amount of the 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027, and in September 2017, we issued to DT the remaining $500 million in aggregate principal amount of the 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027. |
On March 13, 2017, DT agreed to purchase a total of $3.5 billion in aggregate principal amounts of Senior Notes with various interest rates and maturity dates (the “new DT Notes”).
Through net settlement in April 2017, we issued to DT a total of $3.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of the new DT Notes and redeemed the $2.5 billion in outstanding aggregate principal amount of Senior Reset Notes with various interest rates and maturity dates (the “old DT Notes”).
The redemption prices of the old DT Notes were 103.144% and 103.183%, resulting in a total of $79 million in early redemption fees. These early redemption fees were recorded as discounts on the issuance of the new DT Notes.
In September 2017, we issued to DT $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027, which is the final tranche of the new DT Notes. We were not required to pay any underwriting fees or issuance costs in connection with the issuance of the notes.
Net proceeds from the issuance of the new DT Notes were $921 million and are included in Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
On May 9, 2017, we exercised our option under existing purchase agreements and issued the following Senior Notes to DT:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Principal Issuances | | Premium | | Net Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Debt |
| 5.300% Senior Notes due 2021 | $ | 2,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,000 |
|
| 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024 | 1,350 |
| | 40 |
| | 1,390 |
|
| 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024 | 650 |
| | 24 |
| | 674 |
|
| Total | $ | 4,000 |
| | $ | 64 |
| | $ | 4,064 |
|
The proceeds were used to fund a portion of the purchase price of spectrum licenses won in the 600 MHz spectrum auction. Net proceeds from these issuances include $64 million in debt premiums. See Note 5 - Goodwill, Spectrum Licenses and Other Intangible Assets of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
On January 22, 2018, DT agreed to purchase $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 4.500% Senior Notes due 2026 and $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of 4.750% Senior Notes due 2028 directly from T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, with no underwriting discount (the “DT Notes”).
DT has agreed that the payment for the DT notes will be made by delivery of $1.25 billion in aggregate principal amount of 8.097% Senior Reset Notes due 2021 and $1.25 billion in aggregate principal amount of 8.195% Senior Reset Notes due 2022 (collectively, the “DT Senior Reset Notes”) held by DT and which T-Mobile USA will have called for redemption, in exchange for the DT notes. In connection with such exchange, we will pay DT in cash the premium portion of the redemption price set
forth in the indenture governing the DT Senior Reset Notes, plus accrued but unpaid interest on the DT Senior Reset Notes to, but not including, the exchange date.
The closing of the issuance and sale of the DT notes to DT, and exchange of the DT Senior Reset Notes, is expected to occur on or about April 30, 2018.
Financing Arrangements
We maintain a handset financing arrangement with Deutsche Bank AG, (“Deutsche Bank”), which allows for up to $108 million in borrowings. Under the handset financing arrangement, we can effectively extend payment terms for invoices payable to certain handset vendors. The interest rate on the handset financing arrangement is determined based on LIBOR plus a specified margin per the arrangement. Obligations under the handset financing arrangement are included in Short-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In 2016, we utilized and repaid $100 million under the financing arrangement. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2020, there waswere no outstanding balance.balances under such financing arrangement.
We also maintain vendor financing arrangements primarily with our primarymain network equipment suppliers. Under the respective agreements, we can obtain extended financing terms. The interest rate onAdditionally, we assumed financial liabilities with certain vendors in connection with the closing of the Merger and incurred additional financial liabilities with DISH at the closing of the Prepaid Transaction. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we repaid $481 million associated with the vendor financing arrangements is determined based onand other financial liabilities, of which $342 million was associated with financial liabilities assumed in connection with the difference between LIBOR and a specified margin perclosing of the agreements. Obligations under the vendor financing arrangementsMerger. These payments are included in Short-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In 2017, we utilized and repaid $300 million under the financing arrangement. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there was no outstanding balance.
Revolving Credit Facility
We had an unsecured revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom which allowed for up to $500 million in borrowings. In December 2016, we terminated our $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom.
In December 2016, T-Mobile USA entered into a $2.5 billion revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom which comprised of (i) a three-year $1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit agreement and (ii) a three-year $1.5 billion secured revolving credit agreement. The applicable margin for the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility ranges from 2.00% to 3.25% per annum for Eurodollar Rate loans. The applicable margin for the Secured Revolving Credit Facility ranges from 1.00% to 1.75% per annum for Eurodollar Rate loans. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.
In January 2018, we utilized proceeds under the revolving credit facility to redeem $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of our 6.125% Senior Notes due 2022 and for general corporate purposes. As of February 5, 2018, there were no outstanding borrowings on the revolving credit facility. The Proceeds and borrowings from the revolving credit facility are presented in Proceeds from borrowing on revolving credit facility and Repayments of revolving credit facility within Net cash (used in) provided by financing activitiesshort-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment and other financial liabilities, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the outstanding balance under the vendor financing arrangements and other financial liabilities was $240 million and $25 million, respectively.
See On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, entered into a Credit Agreement with certain financial institutions named therein, providing for a $4.0 billion secured term loan facility (the “New Secured Term Loan Facility”) and a $4.0 billion revolving credit facility (the “New Revolving Credit Facility”). On September 16, 2020, we increased the aggregate commitment under the New Revolving Credit Facility to $5.5 billion through an amendment to the Credit Agreement. On October 9, 2020, we repaid at par all of the outstanding amounts under, and terminated, our New Secured Term Loan Facility. As of December 31, 2020, there was no outstanding balance under the New Revolving Credit Facility.
On October 30, 2020, we entered into a $5.0 billion senior secured term loan commitment with certain financial institutions. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on January 14, 2021, we issued an aggregate of $3.0 billion in Senior Notes. The senior secured term loan commitment was reduced by an amount equal to the aggregate gross proceeds of the Senior Notes, which reduced the commitment to $2.0 billion. Up to $2.0 billion of loans under the commitment may be drawn at any time (subject to customary conditions precedent) through June 30, 2021. If drawn, the facility matures in 364 days with one six-month extension exercisable at our discretion. Proceeds may be used for general corporate purposes and will accrue interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.25% per annum.
Debt Financing
As of December 31, 2020, our total debt and financing lease liabilities were $73.6 billion, excluding our tower obligations, of which $66.5 billion was classified as long-term debt and $1.4 billion was classified as long-term financing lease liabilities.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we issued short- and long-term debt for net proceeds of $54.2 billion and redeemed and repaid short- and long-term debt with an aggregate principal amount of $39.9 billion. Additionally, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we assumed certain indebtedness of Sprint totaling $31.8 billion.
On October 6, 2020, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued an aggregate of $4.0 billion in Senior Secured Notes bearing interest rates ranging from 2.050% to 3.300% and maturing in 2028 through 2051. On October 9, 2020, we used the net proceeds of $4.0 billion to repay at par all of the outstanding amounts under, and terminate, our New Secured Term Loan Facility.
On October 28, 2020, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued an aggregate of $4.75 billion in Senior Secured Notes bearing interest rates ranging from 2.250% to 3.600% and maturing in 2031 through 2060. We intend to use the net proceeds of $4.6 billion for general corporate purposes, which may include among other things, acquisitions of additional spectrum and refinancing existing indebtedness on an ongoing basis.
On October 30, 2020, we entered into a $5.0 billion senior secured term loan commitment with certain financial institutions. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on January 14, 2021, T-Mobile USA issued $1.0 billion of 2.250% Senior Notes due 2026, $1.0 billion of 2.625% Senior Notes due 2029, and $1.0 billion of 2.875% Senior Notes due 2031. We intend to use the net proceeds of $3.0 billion for general corporate purposes, which may include among other things, financing acquisitions of additional spectrum and refinancing existing indebtedness on an ongoing basis. A portion of the senior secured term loan commitments were reduced by an amount equal to the aggregate gross proceeds of the Senior Notes, which reduced the commitment to $2.0 billion. Up to $2.0 billion of loans under the commitment may be drawn at any time (subject to customary conditions precedent) through June 30, 2021. If drawn, the facility matures in 364 days with one six-month extension exercisable at our discretion. Proceeds may be used for general corporate purposes and will accrue interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.25% per annum.
For more information regarding our debt financing transactions, see Note 78 - Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements includedStatements.
Spectrum Auction
In March 2020, the FCC announced that we were the winning bidder of 2,384 licenses in Part II, ItemAuction 103 (37/39 GHz and 47 GHz spectrum bands) for an aggregate price of $873 million, net of an incentive payment of $59 million. At the inception of Auction 103 in October 2019, we deposited $82 million with the FCC. Upon conclusion of Auction 103 in March 2020, we made a down payment of $93 million for the purchase price of the licenses won in the auction. On April 8, 2020, we paid the FCC the remaining $698 million of this Form 10-Kthe purchase price for further information.the licenses won in the auction. Prior to the Merger, the FCC announced that Sprint was the winning bidder of 127 licenses in Auction 103 (37/39 GHz and 47 GHz spectrum bands). All payments related to the licenses won were made by Sprint prior the Merger.
Interest Rate Lock Derivatives
In April 2020, in connection with the issuance of an aggregate of $19.0 billion in Senior Secured Notes, we terminated our interest rate lock derivative. At the time of termination, the interest rate lock derivatives were a liability of $2.3 billion, of which $1.2 billion was cash collateralized. Consequently, the net cash required to settle the interest rate lock derivatives was an additional $1.1 billion and was paid at termination.
For more information regarding the termination of our interest rate lock derivative, see Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Future Sources and Uses of Liquidity
We couldmay seek additional sources of liquidity, including through the issuance of additional long-term debt in 2018,2021, to continue to opportunistically acquire spectrum licenses or other assets in private party transactions or for the refinancing of existing long-term debt on an opportunistic basis. Excluding liquidity that could be needed for spectrum acquisitions, or for other assets, we expect our principal sources of funding to be sufficient to meet our anticipated liquidity needs for business operations for the next 12 months.months as well as our longer-term liquidity needs. Our intended use of any such funds is for general corporate purposes, including for capital expenditures, spectrum purchases, opportunistic investments and acquisitions, redemption of high yield callable debt and stock purchases.the execution of our integration plan.
We determine future liquidity requirements, for both operations and capital expenditures, based in large part upon projected financial and operating performance, and opportunities to acquire additional spectrum. We regularly review and update these projections for changes in current and projected financial and operating results, general economic conditions, the competitive landscape and other factors. We have incurred, and will incur, substantial expenses as a result of completing the Transactions, the Divestiture Transaction and compliance with the Government Commitments, and we are also expected to incur substantial restructuring expenses in connection with integrating and coordinating T-Mobile’s and Sprint’s businesses, operations, policies and procedures. While we have assumed that a certain level of Merger-related expenses will be incurred, factors beyond our control, including required consultation and negotiation with certain counterparties, could affect the total amount or the timing of these expenses. These expenses could exceed the costs historically borne by us and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. There are a number of additional risks and uncertainties, including those due to the impact of the Pandemic, that could cause our financial and operating results and capital requirements to differ materially from our projections, which could cause future liquidity to differ materially from our assessment. See “Risk Factors - Risk Related to our
Business and Wireless Industry - The Pandemic has adversely affected, and will continue to adversely affect, our business, liquidity, financial condition, and operating results.”
The indentures, supplemental indentures and credit
facilitiesagreements governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding
capitalfinancing leases, contain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the
IssuerIssuers or borrowers and the Guarantor Subsidiaries
(each as defined in Note 16 – Guarantor Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form
10-K) to: incur more debt;debt, pay dividends and make distributions on our common stock;stock, make certain investments;investments, repurchase stock;stock, create liens or other encumbrances;encumbrances, enter into transactions with affiliates;affiliates, enter into transactions that restrict dividends or distributions from subsidiaries;subsidiaries, and merge, consolidate or sell, or otherwise dispose of, substantially all of their assets. Certain provisions of each of the credit facilities,agreements, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties restrict the ability of the IssuerIssuers or borrowers to loan funds or make payments to the Parent. However, the Issuer isIssuers or borrowers are allowed to make certain permitted payments to the Parent under the terms of each of the credit facilities,agreements, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties. We were in compliance with all restrictive debt covenants as of December 31, 2017.2020.
CapitalThe Merger
In connection with the closing of the Merger, on April 1, 2020, we assumed Sprint’s liabilities, which include accounts payable and accrued liabilities, short-term debt, operating and financing lease liabilities, net pension plan liabilities, deferred tax liabilities and long-term debt with an aggregate fair value of $31.8 billion.
Shentel Wireless Asset Acquisition
Sprint PCS (specifically Sprint Spectrum L.P.) is party to a variety of publicly filed agreements with Shenandoah Personal Communications Company LLC (“Shentel”), pursuant to which Shentel is the exclusive provider of Sprint PCS’s wireless mobility communications network products in certain parts of Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Pursuant to one such agreement, the Sprint PCS Management Agreement, dated November 5, 1999 (as amended, supplemented and modified from time to time, the “Management Agreement”), Sprint PCS was granted an option to purchase Shentel’s wireless telecommunications assets used to provide services pursuant to the Management Agreement. On August 26, 2020, Sprint, now our indirect subsidiary, on behalf of and as the direct or indirect owner of Sprint PCS, exercised its option by delivering a binding notice of exercise to Shentel. T-Mobile’s exercise of its option triggered a requirement for the parties to engage three independent valuation providers (the “Valuation Providers”) to calculate the “entire business value” (the “Entire Business Value”) of such wireless telecommunications assets, pursuant to a formula and valuation process prescribed in the Management Agreement.
Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on February 1, 2021, in accordance with the Management Agreement and other agreed-upon terms, the Valuation Providers determined and calculated the Entire Business Value of Shentel’s wireless telecommunications assets used to provide services pursuant to the Management Agreement to be $2.1 billion, and correspondingly, the base purchase price for such wireless telecommunications assets shall be ninety percent (90%) of that Entire Business Value amount ($1.9 billion), subject to certain other purchase price adjustments prescribed by the Management Agreement and such additional purchase price adjustments agreed by the parties. The parties are negotiating the remaining outstanding terms of a definitive agreement to govern the purchase of Shentel’s wireless telecommunication assets and expect the transaction to close in the second quarter of 2021 after satisfying customary conditions to closing.
Financing Lease Facilities
We have entered into uncommitted capitalfinancing lease facilities with certain partners whichthat provide us with the ability to enter into capitalfinancing leases for network equipment and services. As of December 31, 2017,2020, we have committed to $2.1$5.1 billion of capitalfinancing leases under these capitalfinancing lease facilities, of which $887 million$1.2 billion was executed during the year ended December 31, 2017.2020. We expect to enter into up to an additional $1.2 billion in financing lease commitments during the year ending December 31, 2021.
Capital Expenditures
Our liquidity requirements have been driven primarily by capital expenditures for spectrum licenses, and the construction, expansion and upgrading of our network infrastructure.infrastructure and the integration of the networks, spectrum, technology, personnel, customer base and business practices of T-Mobile and Sprint. Property and equipment capital expenditures primarily relate to the integration of our network transformation, including the build out of 700 MHz A-Blockacquired Sprint 2.5 GHz spectrum licenses and existing 600 MHz spectrum licenses. licenses as we build out our
nationwide 5G network. We expect the majority of our remaining capital expenditures related to these efforts to occur in 2021 and 2022, after which we expect capital expenditure requirements to reduce.
We expect cash purchases of property and equipment excluding capitalized interest, to be in the range of $4.9from $11.7 billion to $5.3$12.0 billion in 2018. This includes expenditures for 5G deployment. Similar to 2017, cash capital expenditures will be front-end loaded in 2018 due to the build out of 600 MHz spectrum licenses. This does not include2021.
For more information regarding our property and equipment obtained through capital lease agreements, leased wireless devices transferred from inventory or any additional purchases ofand spectrum licenses.
In April 2017, the FCC announced that we were the winning bidder of 1,525 licenses, in the 600 MHz spectrum auction for an aggregate price of $8.0 billion. At the inception see Note 5 – Property and Equipment and Note 6 - Goodwill, Spectrum License Transactions and Other Intangible Assetsof the auction in June 2016, we deposited $2.2 billion with the FCC which, based on the outcome of the auction, was sufficient to cover our down payment obligation due in April 2017. In May 2017, we paid the FCC the remaining $5.8 billion of the purchase price using cash reserves and by issuing debt to DT, our majority stockholder, pursuant to existing debt purchase commitments. See Note 7 - Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included respectively.
Dividends
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.the foreseeable future. Our credit facilities and the indentures and supplemental indentures governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding financing leases, contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common stock.
The $5.8 billion paymentContractual Obligations
In connection with the regulatory approvals of the purchase price is included in PurchasesTransactions, we made commitments to various state and federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of spectrum licensesJustice’s (the “DOJ”) and other intangible assets, including deposits within Net cash used in investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The licenses are included in Spectrum licenses as of December 31, 2017, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We began deployment ofFCC.
The contractual commitments and purchase obligations of Sprint were assumed upon the completion of the Merger. These contractual commitments and purchase obligations are primarily commitments to purchase wireless devices, network services, equipment, software, marketing sponsorship agreements and other items in Part II, Item 8the ordinary course of this Form 10-K for further information.business.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and borrowings as of December 31, 20172020, and the timing and effect that such commitments are expected to have on our liquidity and capital requirements in future periods:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Less Than 1 Year | | 1 - 3 Years | | 4 - 5 Years | | More Than 5 Years | | Total |
Long-term debt (1) | $ | 4,486 | | | $ | 11,960 | | | $ | 9,891 | | | $ | 43,052 | | | $ | 69,389 | |
| Interest on long-term debt | 3,477 | | | 5,938 | | | 4,317 | | | 13,817 | | | 27,549 | |
| Financing lease liabilities, including imputed interest | 1,121 | | | 1,217 | | | 229 | | | 61 | | | 2,628 | |
Tower obligations (2) | 397 | | | 716 | | | 598 | | | 624 | | | 2,335 | |
| Operating lease liabilities, including imputed interest | 4,903 | | | 8,113 | | | 6,146 | | | 18,940 | | | 38,102 | |
Purchase obligations (3) | 5,033 | | | 4,462 | | | 2,392 | | | 1,723 | | | 13,610 | |
Spectrum leases and service credits (4) | 338 | | | 675 | | | 594 | | | 5,077 | | | 6,684 | |
| Total contractual obligations | $ | 19,755 | | | $ | 33,081 | | | $ | 24,167 | | | $ | 83,294 | | | $ | 160,297 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Less Than 1 Year | | 1 - 3 Years | | 4 - 5 Years | | More Than 5 Years | | Total |
Long-term debt (1) | $ | 1,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8,000 |
| | $ | 17,450 |
| | $ | 26,450 |
|
| Interest on long-term debt | 1,501 |
| | 2,939 |
| | 2,539 |
| | 1,976 |
| | 8,955 |
|
| Capital lease obligations, including interest and maintenance | 682 |
| | 972 |
| | 218 |
| | 172 |
| | 2,044 |
|
Tower obligations (2) | 189 |
| | 379 |
| | 381 |
| | 1,006 |
| | 1,955 |
|
Operating leases (3) | 2,448 |
| | 4,083 |
| | 2,686 |
| | 2,251 |
| | 11,468 |
|
Purchase obligations (4) | 2,146 |
| | 2,216 |
| | 1,492 |
| | 960 |
| | 6,814 |
|
Network decommissioning (5) | 101 |
| | 123 |
| | 60 |
| | 21 |
| | 305 |
|
| Total contractual obligations | $ | 8,067 |
| | $ | 10,712 |
| | $ | 15,376 |
| | $ | 23,836 |
| | $ | 57,991 |
|
| |
(1) | Represents principal amounts of long-term debt to affiliates and third parties at maturity, excluding unamortized premium from purchase price allocation fair value adjustment, capital lease obligations and vendor financing arrangements. See Note 7 – Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information. |
| |
(2) | Future minimum payments, including principal and interest payments and imputed lease rental income, related to the tower obligations. See Note 8 – Tower Obligations of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information. |
| |
(3) | Future minimum lease payments for all cell site leases presented above to include payments due for the initial non-cancelable lease term only as they represent the payments which we cannot avoid at our option and also corresponds to our lease term assessment for new leases. |
| |
(4) | The minimum commitment for certain obligations is based on termination penalties that could be paid to exit the contracts. Termination penalties are included in the above table as payments due as of the earliest we could exit the contract, typically in less than one year. For certain contracts that include fixed volume purchase commitments and fixed prices for various products, the purchase obligations are calculated using fixed volumes and contractually fixed prices for the products that are expected to be purchased. This table does not include open purchase orders as of December 31, 2017 under normal business purposes. See Note 13 - Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information. |
| |
(5) | Represents future undiscounted cash flows related to decommissioned MetroPCS CDMA network and certain other redundant cell sites as of December 31, 2017. |
(1)Represents principal amounts of long-term debt to affiliates and third parties at maturity, excluding unamortized premiums, discounts, debt issuance costs, consent fees, and financing lease obligations. See Note 8 – Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. (2)Future minimum payments, including principal and interest payments, related to the tower obligations. See Note 9 – Tower Obligations of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. (3)The minimum commitment for certain obligations is based on termination penalties that could be paid to exit the contracts. Termination penalties are included in the above table as payments due as of the earliest we could exit the contract, typically in less than one year. For certain contracts that include fixed volume purchase commitments and fixed prices for various products, the purchase obligations are calculated using fixed volumes and contractually fixed prices for the products that are expected to be purchased. This table does not include open purchase orders as of December 31, 2020 under normal business purposes. See Note 18 – Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. (4)Spectrum lease agreements are typically for five to 10 years with automatic renewal provisions, bringing the total term of the agreements up to 30 years.
Certain commitments and obligations are included in the table based on the year of required payment or an estimate of the year of payment. Other long-term liabilities excluding network decommissioning, have been omitted from the table above due to the uncertainty of the timing of payments, combined with the absencelack of historical trendingtrends to be used as a predictor of suchpredict future payments. See Note 1420 – Additional Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
The purchase obligations reflected in the table above are primarily commitments to purchase handsets and accessories,spectrum licenses, wireless devices, network services, equipment, software, programmingmarketing sponsorship agreements and network services, and marketing activities, which will be used or soldother items in the ordinary course of business. These amounts do not represent T-Mobile’sour entire anticipated purchases in the future, but represent only those items for which T-Mobile iswe are contractually committed. Where T-Mobile iswe are committed to make a minimum payment to the supplier regardless of whether it takeswe take delivery, T-Mobile haswe have included only that minimum payment as a purchase obligation. Additionally, included within purchase obligations are amounts for theThe acquisition of spectrum licenses which areis subject to regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions.
In January 2018, we closed on
Related Party Transactions
SoftBank
On February 20, 2020, T-Mobile, SoftBank and DT entered into a Unit PurchaseLetter Agreement to acquire the remaining equityas described in INS, a 54% owned unconsolidated subsidiary, for a purchase price of $25 million. See Note 132 - CommitmentsBusiness Combination. The Letter Agreement requires T-Mobile to issue to SoftBank 48,751,557 shares of T-Mobile common stock, subject to the terms and Contingenciesconditions set forth in the Letter Agreement, for no additional consideration, if certain conditions are met.
On June 22, 2020, we entered into a Master Framework Agreement and related transactions with SoftBank to facilitate the SoftBank Monetization as described in Note 14 - SoftBank Equity Transactionof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8Statements. As of this Form 10-K for further information.
In January 2018, we closed onDecember 31, 2020, DT and SoftBank held, directly or indirectly, approximately 43.4% and 8.6%, respectively, of our previously announced acquisitionoutstanding common stock, with the remaining approximately 48.0% of Layer3 TV, Inc. (“Layer3 TV”) for consideration of approximately $325 million, subject to customary working capital andour outstanding common stock held by other post-closing adjustments. Upon closingstockholders. As a result of the transaction, Layer3 TV became a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary. See Note 13 - Commitments and ContingenciesProxy Agreements, DT has voting control as of December 31, 2020, over approximately 52.3% of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock. In addition, as provided for in the Master Framework Agreement, DT also holds certain call options over approximately 101.5 million shares of our common stock held by SoftBank Group Capital Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of SoftBank.
On July 27, 2020, in connection with the SoftBank Monetization, the Rights Offering exercise period closed, and on August 3, 2020, the Rights Offering closed, resulting in the sale of 19,750,000 shares of our common stock.
Marcelo Claure
On June 22, 2020, we entered into a Master Framework Agreement which provided for the purchase of shares of our common stock by Marcelo Claure, a member of our board of directors, from us at a specified price.
Brightstar
We had arrangements with Brightstar, a subsidiary of SoftBank, whereby Brightstar provided supply chain and inventory management services to us in Part II, Itemour indirect channels.
Deutsche Telekom
We have related party transactions associated with DT or its affiliates in the ordinary course of business, including intercompany servicing and licensing.
On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we repaid our $4.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility with DT and repurchased from DT $4.0 billion of indebtedness to affiliates, consisting of $2.0 billion of 5.300% Senior Notes due
2021 and $2.0 billion of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024 as well as made an additional payment for requisite consents to DT of $13 million.
On July 4, 2020, we redeemed $1.25 billion aggregate principal amount of our 5.125% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2021.
For more information regarding our related party debt transactions, see Note 8 - Debtof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Disclosure of Iranian Activities under Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Section 13(r) requires an issuer to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports, as applicable, whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with designated natural persons or entities involved in terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Disclosure is required even where the activities, transactions or dealings are conducted outside the U.S. by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with applicable law, and whether or not the activities are sanctionable under U.S. law.
As of the date of this Form 10-Kreport, we are not aware of any activity, transaction or dealing by us or any of our affiliates for further information.the year ended December 31, 2020, that requires disclosure in this report under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, except as set forth below with respect to affiliates that we do not control and that are our affiliates solely due to their common control with either DT or SoftBank. We have relied upon DT and SoftBank for information regarding their respective activities, transactions and dealings.
DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, is party to roaming and interconnect agreements with the following mobile and fixed line telecommunication providers in Iran, some of which are or may be government-controlled entities: Irancell Telecommunications Services Company, Telecommunication Kish Company, Mobile Telecommunication Company of Iran, and Telecommunication Infrastructure Company of Iran. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2020, DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, provided basic telecommunications services to three customers in Germany identified on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List maintained by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: Bank Melli, Bank Sepah, and Europäisch-Iranische Handelsbank. These services have been terminated or are in the process of being terminated.For the year ended December 31, 2020, gross revenues of all DT affiliates generated by roaming and interconnection traffic and telecommunications services with the Iranian parties identified herein were less than $0.1 million, and the estimated net profits were less than $0.1 million.
In addition, DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries that operate a fixed-line network in their respective European home countries (in particular Germany), provides telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to the Embassy of Iran in those European countries. Gross revenues and net profits recorded from these activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 were less than $0.1 million. We understand that DT intends to continue these activities.
Separately, SoftBank, through one of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, provides roaming services in Iran through Irancell Telecommunications Services Company. During the nine months from the acquisition of Sprint on April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, SoftBank had no gross revenues from such services and no net profit was generated. We understand that the SoftBank subsidiary intends to continue such services. This subsidiary also provides telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to accounts affiliated with the Embassy of Iran in Japan. During the nine months from the acquisition of Sprint on April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, SoftBank estimates that gross revenues and net profit generated by such services were both under $0.1 million. We understand that the SoftBank subsidiary is obligated under contract and intends to continue such services.
In addition, SoftBank, through one of its non-U.S. indirect subsidiaries, provides office supplies to the Embassy of Iran in Japan. SoftBank estimates that gross revenue and net profit generated by such services during the nine months from the acquisition of Sprint on April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, were both under $0.1 million. We understand that the SoftBank subsidiary intends to continue such activities.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In 2015, we entered into an arrangement,We have arrangements, as amended from time to time, to sell certain EIP accounts receivable on a revolving basis as an additional source of liquidity. In August 2017, the arrangement was amended to reduce the maximum funding commitment to $1.2 billion and extend the scheduled expiration date to November 2018. In December 2017, the arrangement was again
amended to increase the maximum funding commitment to $1.3 billion. See Note 3 – Sales of Certain Receivables of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
In 2014, we entered into an arrangement, as amended, to sell certain service accounts receivable on a revolving basis as an additionala source of liquidity. In November 2016, the arrangement was amended to increase the maximum funding commitment to $950 million and extend the scheduled expiration date to March 2018. In February 2018, the arrangement was again amended to extend the scheduled expiration date to March 2019. As of December 31, 2017, T-Mobile2020, we derecognized net receivables of $2.7$2.5 billion upon sale through these arrangements. See
For more information regarding these off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 34 – Sales of Certain Receivables of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.Statements.
Related-Party Transactions
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we entered into certain debt related transactions with affiliates. See Note 7 – Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
We also have related party transactions associated with DT or its affiliates in the ordinary course of business, including intercompany servicing and licensing.
Disclosure of Iranian Activities under Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Section 13(r) requires an issuer to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports, as applicable, whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with designated natural persons or entities involved in terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Disclosure is required even where the activities, transactions or dealings are conducted outside the U.S. by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with applicable law, and whether or not the activities are sanctionable under U.S. law.
As of the date of this report, we are not aware of any activity, transaction or dealing by us or any of our affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2017, that requires disclosure in this report under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, except as set forth below with respect to affiliates that we do not control and that are our affiliates solely due to their common control with DT. We have relied upon DT for information regarding their activities, transactions and dealings.
DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, is party to roaming and interconnect agreements with the following mobile and fixed line telecommunication providers in Iran, some of which are or may be government-controlled entities: Gostaresh Ertebatat Taliya, Irancell Telecommunications Services Company (“MTN Irancell”), Telecommunication Kish Company, Mobile Telecommunication Company of Iran, and Telecommunication Infrastructure Company of Iran. For the year ended December 31, 2017, gross revenues of all DT affiliates generated by roaming and interconnection traffic with Iran were less than $4 million and estimated net profits were less than $4 million.
In addition, DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, operating a fixed line network in their respective European home countries (in particular Germany), provides telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to the Embassy of Iran in those European countries. Gross revenues and net profits recorded from these activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 were less than $0.4 million. We understand that DT intends to continue these activities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition as they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. See Note 1 –- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information.
SixThree of these policies, discussed below, are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors have reviewed and approved these critical accounting policies.
Allowances
We maintain an allowance for credit losses, which is management’s estimate of such losses inherent in the receivables portfolio, comprised of accounts receivable and EIP receivable segments. Changes in the allowance for credit losses and, therefore, in related provision for credit losses (“bad debt expense”) can materially affect earnings. Credit risk characteristics are assessed for each receivable segment. In applying the judgment and review required to determine the allowance for credit losses, management considers a number of factors, including customer behavior, credit quality of the customer base and other qualitative factors such as macro-economic conditions. While our methodology attributes portions of the allowance to specific portfolio segments, the entire allowance for credit losses is available to absorb credit losses inherent in the total receivables portfolio.
Management also considers an amount that represents management’s judgment of risks inherent in the process and assumptions used in establishing the allowance for credit losses, including process risk and other subjective factors, including industry trends and emerging risk assessments.
To the extent that actual loss experience differs significantly from historical trends or assumptions, the appropriate allowance levels for realized credit losses could differ from the estimate. We write off account balances if collection efforts are unsuccessful and the receivable balance is deemed uncollectible, based on customer credit ratings and the length of time from the original billing date.
We offer certain retail customers the option to pay for their devices and other purchases in installments over a period of up to 24 months using a zero interest EIP. At the time of an installment sale, we impute a discount for interest and record the EIP receivables at their present value, which is determined by discounting future payments at the imputed interest rate. The difference between the present value of the EIP receivables and their face amount results in a discount which is recorded as a direct reduction to the carrying value of the EIP receivable with a corresponding reduction to equipment revenue. The imputed discount rate is primarily comprised of current market interest rates and the estimated credit risk on the EIP receivables. As a result, we do not recognize a separate valuation allowance at the time of issuance as the effects of uncertainty about future cash flows are included in the initial present value measurement of the EIP receivable. The imputed discount on EIP receivables is amortized over the financed installment term using the effective interest method and recognized as Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Subsequent to the initial determination of the imputed discount, we recognize an allowance for credit losses to the extent the amount of estimated credit losses on the gross EIP receivable segment exceed the remaining unamortized imputed discount balances.
Total imputed discount and allowances as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately 8.1% and 8.0%, respectively, of the total amount of gross accounts receivable, including EIP receivables.
Depreciation
Depreciation commences once assets have been placed in service.Our property and equipment balance represents a significant component of our consolidated assets. We record property and equipment at cost, and we generally depreciate property and equipment on a straight-line basis over the periodestimated useful life of the assets. If all other factors were to remain unchanged, we expect that a one-year increase in the useful lives of our in-service property and equipment, provide economic benefit. Leased wirelessexclusive of leased devices, are depreciated to their estimated residual value overwould have resulted in a decrease of approximately $2.9 billion in our 2020 depreciation expense and that a one-year decrease in the period expected to provide utility to T-Mobile, which is generally shorter than the lease term and considers expected losses. Depreciable life studies are performed periodically to confirm the appropriateness of depreciable lives for certain categories of property, plant and equipment. These studies consider actual usage, physical wear and tear, replacement history and assumptions about technology evolution. When these factors indicate that an asset’s useful life is different from the previous assessment, the remaining book values are depreciated prospectively over the adjusted remaining estimated useful life. would have resulted in an increase of approximately $3.5 billion in our 2020 depreciation expense.
Evaluation of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment
We assess the carrying value of goodwillGoodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, are not amortized but tested for potential impairment annually, as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate thatsuch assets might be impaired.
We test goodwill on a reporting unit basis by comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its book value. If the fair value exceeds the book value, then no impairment is measured. We have identified two reporting units for which discrete financial information is available and results are regularly reviewed by management: wireless and Layer3. The Layer3 reporting unit consists of the assets and liabilities of Layer3 TV, Inc., which was acquired in January 2018. The services provided by the Layer3 reporting unit are branded TVisionTM. The wireless reporting unit consists of the remaining assets and liabilities of T-Mobile US, Inc., excluding Layer3 TV, Inc. We separately evaluate these reporting units for impairment.
When assessing goodwill for impairment we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if athe quantitative impairment test is necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative
assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of thea reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized would not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
We employed a qualitative approach to assess the wireless reporting unit. The fair value of the wireless reporting unit is determined using a market approach, which is based on market capitalization. We recognize market capitalization is subject to volatility and will monitor changes in market capitalization to determine whether declines, if any, necessitate an interim impairment review. In the event market capitalization does decline below its book value, we will consider the length, severity and reasons for the decline when assessing whether potential impairment exists, including considering whether a control premium should be added to the market capitalization. We believe short-term fluctuations in share price may not necessarily reflect the underlying
aggregate fair value. No events or change in circumstances have occurred that indicate the fair value of the wireless reporting unit may be below its carrying amount at December 31, 2020.
Concurrent with the consummation of the Merger, management also revisited the plans for our TVisionTM services offering and the integration of this offering with the Sprint customer base. Additionally, we expect our significantly enhanced spectrum position following the Merger will allow us to accelerate our in-home broadband internet service strategy. The enhanced in-home broadband opportunity, along with the acquisition of certain content rights, created a strategic shift in our TVisionTM services offering allowing us the ability to develop a video product which will be complementary to the in-home broadband offering. Based on these events and changes in circumstances, we determined that recoverability of the carrying amount of goodwill for the Layer3 reporting unit should be evaluated for impairment. We employed a quantitative approach to assess the Layer3 reporting unit. The fair value of the Layer3 reporting unit was determined using an income approach, which was based on estimated discounted future cash flows.
We made estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows, discount rates and long-term growth rates to determine the reporting unit’s estimated fair value. The key assumptions used were as follows:
•Expected cash flows underlying the TVisionTM business plan for the periods 2020 through 2025, which took into account assumptions for a delayed launch, estimates of subscribers for TVisionTM services, average revenue and content cost per subscriber, operating costs and capital expenditures;
•Cash flows beyond 2025 were projected to grow at a long-term growth rate estimated at 3%. Estimating a long-term growth rate requires significant judgment about future business strategies as well as micro- and macro-economic environments that are inherently uncertain; and
•We used a discount rate of 30% to risk adjust the cash flow projections in determining the estimated fair value.
The carrying value of the Layer3 reporting unit exceeded its estimated fair value as of June 30, 2020. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded an impairment loss of $218 million, which is included in Impairment expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. This impairment reduced the goodwill assigned to the Layer3 reporting unit to zero.
We test spectrum licenses for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with theour management of the overall business at a
national level. We may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative
assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the estimated fair value of the intangible asset. If the carrying amountestimated fair value of the spectrum licenses exceeds the fair value,is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized. We estimate the fair value of the spectrum licenses using the Greenfield approach,methodology, which is an income approach, that estimatesto estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The Greenfield approachmethodology values the spectrum licenses by calculating the cash flow generating potential of a hypothetical start-up company that goes into business with no assets except the asset to be valued (in this case, spectrum licenses). and makes investments required to build an operation comparable to current use. The value of the spectrum licenses can be considered as equal to the present value of the cash flows of this hypothetical start-up company. We base the assumptions underlying the Greenfield approachmethodology on a combination of market participant data and our historical results, trends and business plans. Future cash flows in the Greenfield approachmethodology are based on estimates and assumptions of market participant revenues, EBITDA margin, network build-out period and a long-term growth rate for a market participant. The cash flows are discounted using a weighted average cost of capital.
The valuation approaches utilized to estimate fair value for the purposes of the impairment tests of goodwill and spectrum
licenses require the use of assumptions and estimates, which involve a degree of uncertainty. If actual results or future
expectations are not consistent with the assumptions, this may result in the recording of significant impairment charges on
goodwill or spectrum licenses. The most significant assumptions within the valuation models are the discount rate, revenues,
EBITDA margins, capital expenditures and the long-term growth rate. See
Guarantee Liabilities
We offer a device trade-in program, JUMP!, which provides eligible customers a specified-price trade-in right to upgrade their device. Upon enrollment, participating customers must finance the purchase of a device on an EIP and have a qualifying T-Mobile monthly wireless service plan, which is treated as a single multiple-element arrangement when entered into at or near the same time. Upon qualifying JUMP! program upgrades, the customers’ remaining EIP balance is settled provided they trade-in their eligible used device in good working condition and purchase a new device from us on a new EIP.
For customers who enroll in JUMP!, we establish a liability through the reduction of revenue, for the portion of revenue which represents the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee. The guarantee liability is valued based on various economic and customer behavioral assumptions, which requires judgment, including estimating the customer's remaining EIP balance at trade-in, the expected fair value of the used device at trade-in, and the probability and timing of trade-in. When customers upgrade their device, the difference between the EIP balance credit to the customer and the fair value of the returned device is recorded against the guarantee liabilities. All assumptions are reviewed periodically.
Rent Expense
Most of the leases on our tower sites have fixed rent escalations which provide for periodic increases in the amount of rent payable over time. We calculate straight-line rent expense for each of these leases based on the fixed non-cancellable term of the lease plus all periods, if any, for which failure to renew the lease imposes a penalty on us in such amount that a renewal appears, at lease inception or significant modification, to be reasonably assured. We consider several factors in assessing whether renewal periods are reasonably assured of being exercised, including the continued maturation of our network nationwide, technological advances within the telecommunications industry and the availability of alternative sites. We make
significant assumptions at lease inception in determining and assessing the factors that constitute a “penalty.” In doing so, we primarily consider costs incurred in acquiring and developing new sites, the useful life of site improvements and equipment costs, future economic conditions and the extent to which improvements in wireless technologies can be incorporated into a current assessment of whether an economic compulsion will exist in the future to renew a lease.
Income Taxes
We recognize deferredDeferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basisbases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences are realized. A valuation allowance is maintained against deferred tax assetsrecorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of thea deferred tax assetsasset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions within the carryforward periods available. We consider many factors when determining whether a valuation allowance is needed, including recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future income, the carryforward periods available for tax reporting purposes and other relevant factors.
We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We assess whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position and adjust the unrecognized tax benefits in light of changes in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
See For information regarding recently issued accounting standards, see Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding recently issued accounting standards.Statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to economic risks in the normal course of business, primarily from changes in interest rates, including changes in investment yields and changes in spreads due to credit risk and other factors. These risks, along with other business risks, impact our cost of capital. Our policy is to manage exposure related to fluctuations in interest rates in order to manage capital costs, control financial risks and maintain financial flexibility over the long term. We have established interest rate risk limits that are closely monitored by measuring interest rate sensitivities of our debt portfolio. We do not foresee significant changes in the strategies used to manage market risk in the near future.
We are exposedCertain potential sources of financing available to changes inus, including our senior secured term loan commitment with certain financial institutions and New Revolving Credit Facility, bear interest rates on our Incremental Term Loan Facility with DT, our majority stockholder.that is indexed to LIBOR plus a fixed margin. As of December 31, 2020, we did not have outstanding balances under these facilities. See Note 7 –8 - Debtof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for furtheradditional information.
To perform the sensitivity analysis, we assessed the risk of a change in the fair value from the effect of a hypothetical interest rate change of positive 150 and negative 50 basis points. In cases where the debt is redeemable and the fair value calculation results in a liability greater than the cost to replace the debt, the maximum liability is assumed to be no greater than the current cost to redeem the debt. As of December 31, 2017, the change in the fair value of our Incremental Term Loan Facility, based on this hypothetical change, is shown in the table below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Fair Value Assuming |
| (in millions) | +150 Basis Point Shift | | -50 Basis Point Shift |
| LIBOR plus 2.00% Senior Secured Term Loan due 2022 | $ | 2,000 |
| | $ | 2,000 |
| | $ | 1,914 |
| | $ | 2,000 |
|
| LIBOR plus 2.00% Senior Secured Term Loan due 2024 | 2,000 |
| | 2,020 |
| | 1,868 |
| | 2,020 |
|
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of T-Mobile US, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of T-Mobile US, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, of stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”).We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidatedfinancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, 2019, and the results oftheir its operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(2013)issued by the COSO.
ChangeChanges in Accounting PrinciplePrinciples
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the presentation of imputed discount on Equipment Installment Plan (“EIP”) receivables.manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019 and the manner in which it accounts for revenues in 2018.
BasisCash and Cash Equivalents
As of December 31, 2020, our Cash and cash equivalents were $10.4 billion compared to $1.5 billion at December 31, 2019.
Free Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow represents Net cash provided by operating activities less cash payments for OpinionsPurchases of property and equipment, including Proceeds from sales of tower sites and Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions, less Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment. Free Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps, are non-GAAP financial measures utilized by our management, investors and analysts of our financial information to evaluate cash available to pay debt and provide further investment in the business.
The Company'stable below provides reconciliations of Free Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps to Net cash provided by operating activities, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | 2020 Versus 2019 | | 2019 Versus 2018 |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ | | % | $ Change | | % Change |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | | | | | | | | $ | 8,640 | | | $ | 6,824 | | | $ | 3,899 | | | $ | 1,816 | | | 27 | % | | $ | 2,925 | | | 75 | % |
| Cash purchases of property and equipment | | | | | | | | | (11,034) | | | (6,391) | | | (5,541) | | | (4,643) | | | 73 | % | | (850) | | | 15 | % |
| Proceeds from sales of tower sites | | | | | | | | | — | | | 38 | | | — | | | (38) | | | (100) | % | | 38 | | | NM |
| Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions | | | | | | | | | 3,134 | | | 3,876 | | | 5,406 | | | (742) | | | (19) | % | | (1,530) | | | (28) | % |
| Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs | | | | | | | | | (82) | | | (28) | | | (212) | | | (54) | | | 193 | % | | 184 | | | (87) | % |
| Free Cash Flow | | | | | | | | | 658 | | | 4,319 | | | 3,552 | | | (3,661) | | | (85) | % | | 767 | | | 22 | % |
| Gross cash paid for the settlement of interest rate swaps | | | | | | | | | 2,343 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,343 | | | NM | | — | | | NM |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps | | | | | | | | | $ | 3,001 | | | $ | 4,319 | | | $ | 3,552 | | | $ | (1,318) | | | (31) | % | | $ | 767 | | | 22 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NM - Not Meaningful
Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps related to Merger financing, decreased $1.3 billion, or 31%. The decrease was primarily impacted by the following:
•Higher Cash purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of $440 million and $473 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, from network integration related to the Merger and the continued build-out of our nationwide 5G network; and
•Lower Proceeds related to our deferred purchase price from securitization transactions; partially offset by
•Higher Net cash provided by operating activities, as described above. Net cash provided by operating activities was impacted by the following:
•$1.5 billion and $442 million in payments for Merger-related costs for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
•$458 million in payments for supplemental employee payroll, third-party commissions and cleaning-related COVID-19 costs for the year ended December 31, 2020.
•The calculation of Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps, excludes the one-time impact of gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps related to Merger financing of $2.3 billion.
Borrowing Capacity
We maintain a financing arrangement with Deutsche Bank AG, which allows for up to $108 million in borrowings. Under the financing arrangement, we can effectively extend payment terms for invoices payable to certain vendors. As of December 31, 2020, there were no outstanding balances under such financing arrangement.
We also maintain vendor financing arrangements primarily with our main network equipment suppliers. Under the respective agreements, we can obtain extended financing terms. Additionally, we assumed financial liabilities with certain vendors in connection with the closing of the Merger and incurred additional financial liabilities with DISH at the closing of the Prepaid Transaction. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we repaid $481 million associated with the vendor financing arrangements and other financial liabilities, of which $342 million was associated with financial liabilities assumed in connection with the closing of the Merger. These payments are included in Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment and other financial liabilities, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the outstanding balance under the vendor financing arrangements and other financial liabilities was $240 million and $25 million, respectively.
On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, entered into a Credit Agreement with certain financial institutions named therein, providing for a $4.0 billion secured term loan facility (the “New Secured Term Loan Facility”) and a $4.0 billion revolving credit facility (the “New Revolving Credit Facility”). On September 16, 2020, we increased the aggregate commitment under the New Revolving Credit Facility to $5.5 billion through an amendment to the Credit Agreement. On October 9, 2020, we repaid at par all of the outstanding amounts under, and terminated, our New Secured Term Loan Facility. As of December 31, 2020, there was no outstanding balance under the New Revolving Credit Facility.
On October 30, 2020, we entered into a $5.0 billion senior secured term loan commitment with certain financial institutions. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on January 14, 2021, we issued an aggregate of $3.0 billion in Senior Notes. The senior secured term loan commitment was reduced by an amount equal to the aggregate gross proceeds of the Senior Notes, which reduced the commitment to $2.0 billion. Up to $2.0 billion of loans under the commitment may be drawn at any time (subject to customary conditions precedent) through June 30, 2021. If drawn, the facility matures in 364 days with one six-month extension exercisable at our discretion. Proceeds may be used for general corporate purposes and will accrue interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.25% per annum.
Debt Financing
As of December 31, 2020, our total debt and financing lease liabilities were $73.6 billion, excluding our tower obligations, of which $66.5 billion was classified as long-term debt and $1.4 billion was classified as long-term financing lease liabilities.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we issued short- and long-term debt for net proceeds of $54.2 billion and redeemed and repaid short- and long-term debt with an aggregate principal amount of $39.9 billion. Additionally, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we assumed certain indebtedness of Sprint totaling $31.8 billion.
On October 6, 2020, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued an aggregate of $4.0 billion in Senior Secured Notes bearing interest rates ranging from 2.050% to 3.300% and maturing in 2028 through 2051. On October 9, 2020, we used the net proceeds of $4.0 billion to repay at par all of the outstanding amounts under, and terminate, our New Secured Term Loan Facility.
On October 28, 2020, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued an aggregate of $4.75 billion in Senior Secured Notes bearing interest rates ranging from 2.250% to 3.600% and maturing in 2031 through 2060. We intend to use the net proceeds of $4.6 billion for general corporate purposes, which may include among other things, acquisitions of additional spectrum and refinancing existing indebtedness on an ongoing basis.
On October 30, 2020, we entered into a $5.0 billion senior secured term loan commitment with certain financial institutions. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on January 14, 2021, T-Mobile USA issued $1.0 billion of 2.250% Senior Notes due 2026, $1.0 billion of 2.625% Senior Notes due 2029, and $1.0 billion of 2.875% Senior Notes due 2031. We intend to use the net proceeds of $3.0 billion for general corporate purposes, which may include among other things, financing acquisitions of additional spectrum and refinancing existing indebtedness on an ongoing basis. A portion of the senior secured term loan commitments were reduced by an amount equal to the aggregate gross proceeds of the Senior Notes, which reduced the commitment to $2.0 billion. Up to $2.0 billion of loans under the commitment may be drawn at any time (subject to customary conditions precedent) through June 30, 2021. If drawn, the facility matures in 364 days with one six-month extension exercisable at our discretion. Proceeds may be used for general corporate purposes and will accrue interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.25% per annum.
For more information regarding our debt financing transactions, see Note 8 - Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Spectrum Auction
In March 2020, the FCC announced that we were the winning bidder of 2,384 licenses in Auction 103 (37/39 GHz and 47 GHz spectrum bands) for an aggregate price of $873 million, net of an incentive payment of $59 million. At the inception of Auction 103 in October 2019, we deposited $82 million with the FCC. Upon conclusion of Auction 103 in March 2020, we made a down payment of $93 million for the purchase price of the licenses won in the auction. On April 8, 2020, we paid the FCC the remaining $698 million of the purchase price for the licenses won in the auction. Prior to the Merger, the FCC announced that Sprint was the winning bidder of 127 licenses in Auction 103 (37/39 GHz and 47 GHz spectrum bands). All payments related to the licenses won were made by Sprint prior the Merger.
Interest Rate Lock Derivatives
In April 2020, in connection with the issuance of an aggregate of $19.0 billion in Senior Secured Notes, we terminated our interest rate lock derivative. At the time of termination, the interest rate lock derivatives were a liability of $2.3 billion, of which $1.2 billion was cash collateralized. Consequently, the net cash required to settle the interest rate lock derivatives was an additional $1.1 billion and was paid at termination.
For more information regarding the termination of our interest rate lock derivative, see Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Future Sources and Uses of Liquidity
We may seek additional sources of liquidity, including through the issuance of additional long-term debt in 2021, to continue to opportunistically acquire spectrum licenses or other assets in private party transactions or for the refinancing of existing long-term debt on an opportunistic basis. Excluding liquidity that could be needed for spectrum acquisitions, or for other assets, we expect our principal sources of funding to be sufficient to meet our anticipated liquidity needs for business operations for the next 12 months as well as our longer-term liquidity needs. Our intended use of any such funds is for general corporate purposes, including for capital expenditures, spectrum purchases, opportunistic investments and acquisitions, redemption of high yield callable debt and the execution of our integration plan.
We determine future liquidity requirements, for both operations and capital expenditures, based in large part upon projected financial and operating performance, and opportunities to acquire additional spectrum. We regularly review and update these projections for changes in current and projected financial and operating results, general economic conditions, the competitive landscape and other factors. We have incurred, and will incur, substantial expenses as a result of completing the Transactions, the Divestiture Transaction and compliance with the Government Commitments, and we are also expected to incur substantial restructuring expenses in connection with integrating and coordinating T-Mobile’s and Sprint’s businesses, operations, policies and procedures. While we have assumed that a certain level of Merger-related expenses will be incurred, factors beyond our control, including required consultation and negotiation with certain counterparties, could affect the total amount or the timing of these expenses. These expenses could exceed the costs historically borne by us and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. There are a number of additional risks and uncertainties, including those due to the impact of the Pandemic, that could cause our financial and operating results and capital requirements to differ materially from our projections, which could cause future liquidity to differ materially from our assessment. See “Risk Factors - Risk Related to our
Business and Wireless Industry - The Pandemic has adversely affected, and will continue to adversely affect, our business, liquidity, financial condition, and operating results.”
The indentures, supplemental indentures and credit agreements governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding financing leases, contain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Issuers or borrowers and the Guarantor Subsidiaries to incur more debt, pay dividends and make distributions on our common stock, make certain investments, repurchase stock, create liens or other encumbrances, enter into transactions with affiliates, enter into transactions that restrict dividends or distributions from subsidiaries, and merge, consolidate or sell, or otherwise dispose of, substantially all of their assets. Certain provisions of each of the credit agreements, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties restrict the ability of the Issuers or borrowers to loan funds or make payments to Parent. However, the Issuers or borrowers are allowed to make certain permitted payments to Parent under the terms of each of the credit agreements, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties. We were in compliance with all restrictive debt covenants as of December 31, 2020.
The Merger
In connection with the closing of the Merger, on April 1, 2020, we assumed Sprint’s liabilities, which include accounts payable and accrued liabilities, short-term debt, operating and financing lease liabilities, net pension plan liabilities, deferred tax liabilities and long-term debt with an aggregate fair value of $31.8 billion.
Shentel Wireless Asset Acquisition
Sprint PCS (specifically Sprint Spectrum L.P.) is party to a variety of publicly filed agreements with Shenandoah Personal Communications Company LLC (“Shentel”), pursuant to which Shentel is the exclusive provider of Sprint PCS’s wireless mobility communications network products in certain parts of Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Pursuant to one such agreement, the Sprint PCS Management Agreement, dated November 5, 1999 (as amended, supplemented and modified from time to time, the “Management Agreement”), Sprint PCS was granted an option to purchase Shentel’s wireless telecommunications assets used to provide services pursuant to the Management Agreement. On August 26, 2020, Sprint, now our indirect subsidiary, on behalf of and as the direct or indirect owner of Sprint PCS, exercised its option by delivering a binding notice of exercise to Shentel. T-Mobile’s exercise of its option triggered a requirement for the parties to engage three independent valuation providers (the “Valuation Providers”) to calculate the “entire business value” (the “Entire Business Value”) of such wireless telecommunications assets, pursuant to a formula and valuation process prescribed in the Management Agreement.
Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on February 1, 2021, in accordance with the Management Agreement and other agreed-upon terms, the Valuation Providers determined and calculated the Entire Business Value of Shentel’s wireless telecommunications assets used to provide services pursuant to the Management Agreement to be $2.1 billion, and correspondingly, the base purchase price for such wireless telecommunications assets shall be ninety percent (90%) of that Entire Business Value amount ($1.9 billion), subject to certain other purchase price adjustments prescribed by the Management Agreement and such additional purchase price adjustments agreed by the parties. The parties are negotiating the remaining outstanding terms of a definitive agreement to govern the purchase of Shentel’s wireless telecommunication assets and expect the transaction to close in the second quarter of 2021 after satisfying customary conditions to closing.
Financing Lease Facilities
We have entered into uncommitted financing lease facilities with certain partners that provide us with the ability to enter into financing leases for network equipment and services. As of December 31, 2020, we have committed to $5.1 billion of financing leases under these financing lease facilities, of which $1.2 billion was executed during the year ended December 31, 2020. We expect to enter into up to an additional $1.2 billion in financing lease commitments during the year ending December 31, 2021.
Capital Expenditures
Our liquidity requirements have been driven primarily by capital expenditures for spectrum licenses, the construction, expansion and upgrading of our network infrastructure and the integration of the networks, spectrum, technology, personnel, customer base and business practices of T-Mobile and Sprint. Property and equipment capital expenditures primarily relate to the integration of our acquired Sprint 2.5 GHz spectrum licenses and existing 600 MHz spectrum licenses as we build out our
nationwide 5G network. We expect the majority of our remaining capital expenditures related to these efforts to occur in 2021 and 2022, after which we expect capital expenditure requirements to reduce.
We expect cash purchases of property and equipment to range from $11.7 billion to $12.0 billion in 2021.
Dividends
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our credit facilities and the indentures and supplemental indentures governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding financing leases, contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common stock.
Contractual Obligations
In connection with the regulatory approvals of the Transactions, we made commitments to various state and federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice’s (the “DOJ”) and FCC.
The contractual commitments and purchase obligations of Sprint were assumed upon the completion of the Merger. These contractual commitments and purchase obligations are primarily commitments to purchase wireless devices, network services, equipment, software, marketing sponsorship agreements and other items in the ordinary course of business.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and borrowings as of December 31, 2020, and the timing and effect that such commitments are expected to have on our liquidity and capital requirements in future periods:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Less Than 1 Year | | 1 - 3 Years | | 4 - 5 Years | | More Than 5 Years | | Total |
Long-term debt (1) | $ | 4,486 | | | $ | 11,960 | | | $ | 9,891 | | | $ | 43,052 | | | $ | 69,389 | |
| Interest on long-term debt | 3,477 | | | 5,938 | | | 4,317 | | | 13,817 | | | 27,549 | |
| Financing lease liabilities, including imputed interest | 1,121 | | | 1,217 | | | 229 | | | 61 | | | 2,628 | |
Tower obligations (2) | 397 | | | 716 | | | 598 | | | 624 | | | 2,335 | |
| Operating lease liabilities, including imputed interest | 4,903 | | | 8,113 | | | 6,146 | | | 18,940 | | | 38,102 | |
Purchase obligations (3) | 5,033 | | | 4,462 | | | 2,392 | | | 1,723 | | | 13,610 | |
Spectrum leases and service credits (4) | 338 | | | 675 | | | 594 | | | 5,077 | | | 6,684 | |
| Total contractual obligations | $ | 19,755 | | | $ | 33,081 | | | $ | 24,167 | | | $ | 83,294 | | | $ | 160,297 | |
(1)Represents principal amounts of long-term debt to affiliates and third parties at maturity, excluding unamortized premiums, discounts, debt issuance costs, consent fees, and financing lease obligations. See Note 8 – Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. (2)Future minimum payments, including principal and interest payments, related to the tower obligations. See Note 9 – Tower Obligations of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. (3)The minimum commitment for certain obligations is based on termination penalties that could be paid to exit the contracts. Termination penalties are included in the above table as payments due as of the earliest we could exit the contract, typically in less than one year. For certain contracts that include fixed volume purchase commitments and fixed prices for various products, the purchase obligations are calculated using fixed volumes and contractually fixed prices for the products that are expected to be purchased. This table does not include open purchase orders as of December 31, 2020 under normal business purposes. See Note 18 – Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. (4)Spectrum lease agreements are typically for five to 10 years with automatic renewal provisions, bringing the total term of the agreements up to 30 years.
Certain commitments and obligations are included in the table based on the year of required payment or an estimate of the year of payment. Other long-term liabilities have been omitted from the table above due to the uncertainty of the timing of payments, combined with the lack of historical trends to predict future payments. See Note 20 – Additional Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
The purchase obligations reflected in the table above are primarily commitments to purchase spectrum licenses, wireless devices, network services, equipment, software, marketing sponsorship agreements and other items in the ordinary course of business. These amounts do not represent our entire anticipated purchases in the future, but represent only those items for which we are contractually committed. Where we are committed to make a minimum payment to the supplier regardless of whether we take delivery, we have included only that minimum payment as a purchase obligation. The acquisition of spectrum licenses is subject to regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions.
Related Party Transactions
SoftBank
On February 20, 2020, T-Mobile, SoftBank and DT entered into a Letter Agreement as described in Note 2 - Business Combination. The Letter Agreement requires T-Mobile to issue to SoftBank 48,751,557 shares of T-Mobile common stock, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Letter Agreement, for no additional consideration, if certain conditions are met.
On June 22, 2020, we entered into a Master Framework Agreement and related transactions with SoftBank to facilitate the SoftBank Monetization as described in Note 14 - SoftBank Equity Transactionof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As of December 31, 2020, DT and SoftBank held, directly or indirectly, approximately 43.4% and 8.6%, respectively, of our outstanding common stock, with the remaining approximately 48.0% of our outstanding common stock held by other stockholders. As a result of the Proxy Agreements, DT has voting control as of December 31, 2020, over approximately 52.3% of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock. In addition, as provided for in the Master Framework Agreement, DT also holds certain call options over approximately 101.5 million shares of our common stock held by SoftBank Group Capital Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of SoftBank.
On July 27, 2020, in connection with the SoftBank Monetization, the Rights Offering exercise period closed, and on August 3, 2020, the Rights Offering closed, resulting in the sale of 19,750,000 shares of our common stock.
Marcelo Claure
On June 22, 2020, we entered into a Master Framework Agreement which provided for the purchase of shares of our common stock by Marcelo Claure, a member of our board of directors, from us at a specified price.
Brightstar
We had arrangements with Brightstar, a subsidiary of SoftBank, whereby Brightstar provided supply chain and inventory management services to us in our indirect channels.
Deutsche Telekom
We have related party transactions associated with DT or its affiliates in the ordinary course of business, including intercompany servicing and licensing.
On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we repaid our $4.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility with DT and repurchased from DT $4.0 billion of indebtedness to affiliates, consisting of $2.0 billion of 5.300% Senior Notes due
2021 and $2.0 billion of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024 as well as made an additional payment for requisite consents to DT of $13 million.
On July 4, 2020, we redeemed $1.25 billion aggregate principal amount of our 5.125% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2021.
For more information regarding our related party debt transactions, see Note 8 - Debtof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Disclosure of Iranian Activities under Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Section 13(r) requires an issuer to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports, as applicable, whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with designated natural persons or entities involved in terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Disclosure is responsiblerequired even where the activities, transactions or dealings are conducted outside the U.S. by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with applicable law, and whether or not the activities are sanctionable under U.S. law.
As of the date of this report, we are not aware of any activity, transaction or dealing by us or any of our affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2020, that requires disclosure in this report under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, except as set forth below with respect to affiliates that we do not control and that are our affiliates solely due to their common control with either DT or SoftBank. We have relied upon DT and SoftBank for information regarding their respective activities, transactions and dealings.
DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, is party to roaming and interconnect agreements with the following mobile and fixed line telecommunication providers in Iran, some of which are or may be government-controlled entities: Irancell Telecommunications Services Company, Telecommunication Kish Company, Mobile Telecommunication Company of Iran, and Telecommunication Infrastructure Company of Iran. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2020, DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, provided basic telecommunications services to three customers in Germany identified on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List maintained by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: Bank Melli, Bank Sepah, and Europäisch-Iranische Handelsbank. These services have been terminated or are in the process of being terminated.For the year ended December 31, 2020, gross revenues of all DT affiliates generated by roaming and interconnection traffic and telecommunications services with the Iranian parties identified herein were less than $0.1 million, and the estimated net profits were less than $0.1 million.
In addition, DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries that operate a fixed-line network in their respective European home countries (in particular Germany), provides telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to the Embassy of Iran in those European countries. Gross revenues and net profits recorded from these activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 were less than $0.1 million. We understand that DT intends to continue these activities.
Separately, SoftBank, through one of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, provides roaming services in Iran through Irancell Telecommunications Services Company. During the nine months from the acquisition of Sprint on April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, SoftBank had no gross revenues from such services and no net profit was generated. We understand that the SoftBank subsidiary intends to continue such services. This subsidiary also provides telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to accounts affiliated with the Embassy of Iran in Japan. During the nine months from the acquisition of Sprint on April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, SoftBank estimates that gross revenues and net profit generated by such services were both under $0.1 million. We understand that the SoftBank subsidiary is obligated under contract and intends to continue such services.
In addition, SoftBank, through one of its non-U.S. indirect subsidiaries, provides office supplies to the Embassy of Iran in Japan. SoftBank estimates that gross revenue and net profit generated by such services during the nine months from the acquisition of Sprint on April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, were both under $0.1 million. We understand that the SoftBank subsidiary intends to continue such activities.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have arrangements, as amended from time to time, to sell certain EIP accounts receivable and service accounts receivable on a revolving basis as a source of liquidity. As of December 31, 2020, we derecognized net receivables of $2.5 billion upon sale through these arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition as they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Three of these policies, discussed below, are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors have reviewed and approved these critical accounting policies.
Depreciation
Our property and equipment balance represents a significant component of our consolidated assets. We record property and equipment at cost, and we generally depreciate property and equipment on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets. If all other factors were to remain unchanged, we expect that a one-year increase in the useful lives of our in-service property and equipment, exclusive of leased devices, would have resulted in a decrease of approximately $2.9 billion in our 2020 depreciation expense and that a one-year decrease in the useful life would have resulted in an increase of approximately $3.5 billion in our 2020 depreciation expense.
Evaluation of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment
Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, are not amortized but tested for potential impairment annually, as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate such assets might be impaired.
We test goodwill on a reporting unit basis by comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its book value. If the fair value exceeds the book value, then no impairment is measured. We have identified two reporting units for which discrete financial information is available and results are regularly reviewed by management: wireless and Layer3. The Layer3 reporting unit consists of the assets and liabilities of Layer3 TV, Inc., which was acquired in January 2018. The services provided by the Layer3 reporting unit are branded TVisionTM. The wireless reporting unit consists of the remaining assets and liabilities of T-Mobile US, Inc., excluding Layer3 TV, Inc. We separately evaluate these reporting units for impairment.
When assessing goodwill for impairment we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized would not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. We employed a qualitative approach to assess the wireless reporting unit. The fair value of the wireless reporting unit is determined using a market approach, which is based on market capitalization. We recognize market capitalization is subject to volatility and will monitor changes in market capitalization to determine whether declines, if any, necessitate an interim impairment review. In the event market capitalization does decline below its book value, we will consider the length, severity and reasons for the decline when assessing whether potential impairment exists, including considering whether a control premium should be added to the market capitalization. We believe short-term fluctuations in share price may not necessarily reflect the underlying
aggregate fair value. No events or change in circumstances have occurred that indicate the fair value of the wireless reporting unit may be below its carrying amount at December 31, 2020.
Concurrent with the consummation of the Merger, management also revisited the plans for our TVisionTM services offering and the integration of this offering with the Sprint customer base. Additionally, we expect our significantly enhanced spectrum position following the Merger will allow us to accelerate our in-home broadband internet service strategy. The enhanced in-home broadband opportunity, along with the acquisition of certain content rights, created a strategic shift in our TVisionTM services offering allowing us the ability to develop a video product which will be complementary to the in-home broadband offering. Based on these events and changes in circumstances, we determined that recoverability of the carrying amount of goodwill for the Layer3 reporting unit should be evaluated for impairment. We employed a quantitative approach to assess the Layer3 reporting unit. The fair value of the Layer3 reporting unit was determined using an income approach, which was based on estimated discounted future cash flows.
We made estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows, discount rates and long-term growth rates to determine the reporting unit’s estimated fair value. The key assumptions used were as follows:
•Expected cash flows underlying the TVisionTM business plan for the periods 2020 through 2025, which took into account assumptions for a delayed launch, estimates of subscribers for TVisionTM services, average revenue and content cost per subscriber, operating costs and capital expenditures;
•Cash flows beyond 2025 were projected to grow at a long-term growth rate estimated at 3%. Estimating a long-term growth rate requires significant judgment about future business strategies as well as micro- and macro-economic environments that are inherently uncertain; and
•We used a discount rate of 30% to risk adjust the cash flow projections in determining the estimated fair value.
The carrying value of the Layer3 reporting unit exceeded its estimated fair value as of June 30, 2020. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded an impairment loss of $218 million, which is included in Impairment expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. This impairment reduced the goodwill assigned to the Layer3 reporting unit to zero.
We test spectrum licenses for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with our management of the overall business at a
national level. We may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative
assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the estimated fair value of the intangible asset. If the estimated fair value of the spectrum licenses is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized. We estimate fair value using the Greenfield methodology, which is an income approach, to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The Greenfield methodology values the spectrum licenses by calculating the cash flow generating potential of a hypothetical start-up company that goes into business with no assets except the asset to be valued (in this case, spectrum licenses) and makes investments required to build an operation comparable to current use. The value of the spectrum licenses can be considered as equal to the present value of the cash flows of this hypothetical start-up company. We base the assumptions underlying the Greenfield methodology on a combination of market participant data and our historical results, trends and business plans. Future cash flows in the Greenfield methodology are based on estimates and assumptions of market participant revenues, EBITDA margin, network build-out period and a long-term growth rate for a market participant. The cash flows are discounted using a weighted average cost of capital.
The valuation approaches utilized to estimate fair value for the purposes of the impairment tests of goodwill and spectrum
licenses require the use of assumptions and estimates, which involve a degree of uncertainty. If actual results or future
expectations are not consistent with the assumptions, this may result in the recording of significant impairment charges on
goodwill or spectrum licenses. The most significant assumptions within the valuation models are the discount rate, revenues,
EBITDA margins, capital expenditures and long-term growth rate.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences are realized. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions within the carryforward periods available.
We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting guidance for maintaining effective internal control overthe financial reporting,statement recognition and for its assessmentmeasurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We assess whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the effectivenessposition and adjust the unrecognized tax benefits in light of internalchanges in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to economic risks in the normal course of business, primarily from changes in interest rates, including changes in investment yields and changes in spreads due to credit risk and other factors. These risks, along with other business risks, impact our cost of capital. Our policy is to manage exposure related to fluctuations in interest rates in order to manage capital costs, control financial risks and maintain financial flexibility over the long term. We have established interest rate risk limits that are closely monitored by measuring interest rate sensitivities of our debt portfolio. We do not foresee significant changes in the strategies used to manage market risk in the near future.
Certain potential sources of financing available to us, including our senior secured term loan commitment with certain financial reporting, included in Management’s Annual institutions and New Revolving Credit Facility, bear interest that is indexed to LIBOR plus a fixed margin. As of December 31, 2020, we did not have outstanding balances under these facilities. See Note 8 - Debtof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of T-Mobile US, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of T-Mobile US, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, including the related notes (collectively referred to express opinions onas the Company’s consolidated“consolidated financial statements and onstatements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered withopinion, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are requiredconsolidated financial statements referred to be independent with respect toabove present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities lawsas of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the applicable rulesresults of its operations and regulationsits cash flows for each of the Securities and Exchange Commission andthree years in the PCAOB.
We conductedperiod ended December 31, 2020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our auditsopinion, the Company maintained, in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidatedfinancial statements are free ofall material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whetherrespects, effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our auditsas of the consolidatedfinancial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidatedfinancial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidatedfinancial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidatedfinancial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal controlDecember 31, 2020, based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessarycriteria established in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting- Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposesChanges in accordance with generallyAccounting Principles
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertainAs discussed in Note 1 to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
February 7, 2018
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2001.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except share and per share amounts) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Assets | | | |
| Current assets | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,219 |
| | $ | 5,500 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $86 and $102 | 1,915 |
| | 1,896 |
|
| Equipment installment plan receivables, net | 2,290 |
| | 1,930 |
|
| Accounts receivable from affiliates | 22 |
| | 40 |
|
| Inventories | 1,566 |
| | 1,111 |
|
| Asset purchase deposit | — |
| | 2,203 |
|
| Other current assets | 1,903 |
| | 1,537 |
|
| Total current assets | 8,915 |
| | 14,217 |
|
| Property and equipment, net | 22,196 |
| | 20,943 |
|
| Goodwill | 1,683 |
| | 1,683 |
|
| Spectrum licenses | 35,366 |
| | 27,014 |
|
| Other intangible assets, net | 217 |
| | 376 |
|
| Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net | 1,274 |
| | 984 |
|
| Other assets | 912 |
| | 674 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 70,563 |
| | $ | 65,891 |
|
| Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | |
| Current liabilities | | | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 8,528 |
| | $ | 7,152 |
|
| Payables to affiliates | 182 |
| | 125 |
|
| Short-term debt | 1,612 |
| | 354 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 779 |
| | 986 |
|
| Other current liabilities | 414 |
| | 405 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 11,515 |
| | 9,022 |
|
| Long-term debt | 12,121 |
| | 21,832 |
|
| Long-term debt to affiliates | 14,586 |
| | 5,600 |
|
| Tower obligations | 2,590 |
| | 2,621 |
|
| Deferred tax liabilities | 3,537 |
| | 4,938 |
|
| Deferred rent expense | 2,720 |
| | 2,616 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | 935 |
| | 1,026 |
|
| Total long-term liabilities | 36,489 |
| | 38,633 |
|
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) |
|
| |
|
|
| Stockholders' equity | | | |
| 5.50% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock Series A, par value $0.00001 per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 0 and 20,000,000 shares issued; 0 and 20,000,000 shares outstanding; $0 and $1,000 aggregate liquidation value | — |
| | — |
|
| Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 860,861,998 and 827,768,818 shares issued, 859,406,651 and 826,357,331 shares outstanding | — |
| | — |
|
| Additional paid-in capital | 38,629 |
| | 38,846 |
|
| Treasury stock, at cost, 1,455,347 and 1,411,487 shares issued | (4 | ) | | (1 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income | 8 |
| | 1 |
|
| Accumulated deficit | (16,074 | ) | | (20,610 | ) |
| Total stockholders' equity | 22,559 |
| | 18,236 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 70,563 |
| | $ | 65,891 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| (in millions, except share and per share amounts) | | |
| Revenues | | | | | |
| Branded postpaid revenues | $ | 19,448 |
| | $ | 18,138 |
| | $ | 16,383 |
|
| Branded prepaid revenues | 9,380 |
| | 8,553 |
| | 7,553 |
|
| Wholesale revenues | 1,102 |
| | 903 |
| | 692 |
|
| Roaming and other service revenues | 230 |
| | 250 |
| | 193 |
|
| Total service revenues | 30,160 |
| | 27,844 |
| | 24,821 |
|
| Equipment revenues | 9,375 |
| | 8,727 |
| | 6,718 |
|
| Other revenues | 1,069 |
| | 919 |
| | 928 |
|
| Total revenues | 40,604 |
| | 37,490 |
| | 32,467 |
|
| Operating expenses | | | | | |
| Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below | 6,100 |
| | 5,731 |
| | 5,554 |
|
| Cost of equipment sales | 11,608 |
| | 10,819 |
| | 9,344 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | 12,259 |
| | 11,378 |
| | 10,189 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 5,984 |
| | 6,243 |
| | 4,688 |
|
| Cost of MetroPCS business combination | — |
| | 104 |
| | 376 |
|
| Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses | (235 | ) | | (835 | ) | | (163 | ) |
| Total operating expense | 35,716 |
| | 33,440 |
| | 29,988 |
|
| Operating income | 4,888 |
| | 4,050 |
| | 2,479 |
|
| Other income (expense) | | | | | |
| Interest expense | (1,111 | ) | | (1,418 | ) | | (1,085 | ) |
| Interest expense to affiliates | (560 | ) | | (312 | ) | | (411 | ) |
| Interest income | 17 |
| | 13 |
| | 6 |
|
| Other expense, net | (73 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (11 | ) |
| Total other expense, net | (1,727 | ) | | (1,723 | ) | | (1,501 | ) |
| Income before income taxes | 3,161 |
| | 2,327 |
| | 978 |
|
| Income tax benefit (expense) | 1,375 |
| | (867 | ) | | (245 | ) |
| Net income | 4,536 |
| | 1,460 |
| | 733 |
|
| Dividends on preferred stock | (55 | ) | | (55 | ) | | (55 | ) |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 4,481 |
| | $ | 1,405 |
| | $ | 678 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 4,536 |
| | $ | 1,460 |
| | $ | 733 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | | | | |
| Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax effect $2, $1 and $(1) | 7 |
| | 2 |
| | (2 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | 7 |
| | 2 |
| | (2 | ) |
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 4,543 |
| | $ | 1,462 |
| | $ | 731 |
|
| Earnings per share | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 5.39 |
| | $ | 1.71 |
| | $ | 0.83 |
|
| Diluted | $ | 5.20 |
| | $ | 1.69 |
| | $ | 0.82 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding | | | | | |
| Basic | 831,850,073 |
| | 822,470,275 |
| | 812,994,028 |
|
| Diluted | 871,787,450 |
| | 833,054,545 |
| | 822,617,938 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Operating activities | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 4,536 |
| | $ | 1,460 |
| | $ | 733 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 5,984 |
| | 6,243 |
| | 4,688 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | 306 |
| | 235 |
| | 201 |
|
| Deferred income tax (benefit) expense | (1,404 | ) | | 914 |
| | 256 |
|
| Bad debt expense | 388 |
| | 477 |
| | 547 |
|
| Losses from sales of receivables | 299 |
| | 228 |
| | 204 |
|
| Deferred rent expense | 76 |
| | 121 |
| | 167 |
|
| Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses | (235 | ) | | (835 | ) | | (163 | ) |
| Change in fair value of embedded derivatives | (52 | ) | | (25 | ) | | 148 |
|
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | (444 | ) | | (603 | ) | | (259 | ) |
| Equipment installment plan receivables | (894 | ) | | 97 |
| | 1,089 |
|
| Inventories | (844 | ) | | (802 | ) | | (2,495 | ) |
| Deferred purchase price from sales of receivables | (86 | ) | | (270 | ) | | (185 | ) |
| Other current and long-term assets | (575 | ) | | (133 | ) | | (217 | ) |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 1,079 |
| | (1,201 | ) | | 693 |
|
| Other current and long-term liabilities | (233 | ) | | 158 |
| | 22 |
|
| Other, net | 61 |
| | 71 |
| | (15 | ) |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 7,962 |
| | 6,135 |
| | 5,414 |
|
| Investing activities | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of $136, $142 and $246 | (5,237 | ) | | (4,702 | ) | | (4,724 | ) |
| Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits | (5,828 | ) | | (3,968 | ) | | (1,935 | ) |
| Purchases of short-term investments | — |
| | — |
| | (2,997 | ) |
| Sales of short-term investments | — |
| | 2,998 |
| | — |
|
| Other, net | 1 |
| | (8 | ) | | 96 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (11,064 | ) | | (5,680 | ) | | (9,560 | ) |
| Financing activities | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | 10,480 |
| | 997 |
| | 3,979 |
|
| Proceeds from tower obligations | — |
| | — |
| | 140 |
|
| Proceeds from borrowing on revolving credit facility | 2,910 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Repayments of revolving credit facility | (2,910 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Repayments of capital lease obligations | (486 | ) | | (205 | ) | | (57 | ) |
| Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net | (300 | ) | | (150 | ) | | (564 | ) |
| Repayments of long-term debt | (10,230 | ) | | (20 | ) | | — |
|
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 21 |
| | 29 |
| | 47 |
|
| Repurchases of common shares | (427 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Tax withholdings on share-based awards | (166 | ) | | (121 | ) | | (156 | ) |
| Dividends on preferred stock | (55 | ) | | (55 | ) | | (55 | ) |
| Other, net | (16 | ) | | (12 | ) | | 79 |
|
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (1,179 | ) | | 463 |
| | 3,413 |
|
| Change in cash and cash equivalents | (4,281 | ) | | 918 |
| | (733 | ) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | |
| Beginning of period | 5,500 |
| | 4,582 |
| | 5,315 |
|
| End of period | $ | 1,219 |
| | $ | 5,500 |
| | $ | 4,582 |
|
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | | | | | |
| Interest payments, net of amounts capitalized, $79, $0 and $0 of which recorded as debt discount (Note 7) | $ | 2,028 |
| | $ | 1,681 |
| | $ | 1,298 |
|
| Income tax payments | 31 |
| | 25 |
| | 54 |
|
| Changes in accounts payable for purchases of property and equipment | 313 |
| | 285 |
| | 46 |
|
| Leased devices transferred from inventory to property and equipment | 1,131 |
| | 1,588 |
| | 2,451 |
|
| Returned leased devices transferred from property and equipment to inventory | (742 | ) | | (602 | ) | | (166 | ) |
| Issuance of short-term debt for financing of property and equipment | 292 |
| | 150 |
| | 500 |
|
| Assets acquired under capital lease obligations | 887 |
| | 799 |
| | 470 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except shares) | Preferred Stock Outstanding | | Common Stock Outstanding | | Treasury Shares at Cost | | Par Value and Additional Paid-in Capital | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Accumulated Deficit | | Total Stockholders' Equity |
| Balance as of December 31, 2014 | 20,000,000 |
| | 807,468,603 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 38,503 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (22,841 | ) | | $ | 15,663 |
|
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 733 |
| | 733 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | — |
| | (2 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 227 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 227 |
|
| Exercise of stock options | — |
| | 2,381,650 |
| | — |
| | 47 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 47 |
|
| Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | 761,085 |
| | — |
| | 21 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21 |
|
| Issuance of vested restricted stock units | — |
| | 11,956,345 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options | — |
| | (4,176,464 | ) | | — |
| | (156 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (156 | ) |
| Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 79 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 79 |
|
| Dividends on preferred stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (55 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (55 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | 20,000,000 |
| | 818,391,219 |
| | — |
| | 38,666 |
| | (1 | ) | | (22,108 | ) | | 16,557 |
|
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,460 |
| | 1,460 |
|
| Other comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 264 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 264 |
|
| Exercise of stock options | — |
| | 982,904 |
| | — |
| | 29 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 29 |
|
| Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | 1,905,534 |
| | — |
| | 63 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 63 |
|
| Issuance of vested restricted stock units | — |
| | 7,712,463 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options | — |
| | (2,605,807 | ) | | — |
| | (122 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (122 | ) |
| Transfer RSU to NQDC plan | — |
| | (28,982 | ) | | (1 | ) | | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Dividends on preferred stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (55 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (55 | ) |
| Prior year Retained Earnings | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 38 |
| | 38 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | 20,000,000 |
| | 826,357,331 |
| | (1 | ) | | 38,846 |
| | 1 |
| | (20,610 | ) | | 18,236 |
|
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,536 |
| | 4,536 |
|
| Other comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | 7 |
|
| Stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 344 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 344 |
|
| Exercise of stock options | — |
| | 450,493 |
| | — |
| | 19 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 19 |
|
| Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | 1,832,043 |
| | — |
| | 82 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 82 |
|
| Issuance of vested restricted stock units | — |
| | 8,338,271 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options | — |
| | (2,754,721 | ) | | — |
| | (166 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (166 | ) |
| Mandatory conversion of preferred shares to common shares | (20,000,000 | ) | | 32,237,983 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Repurchases of common stock | — |
| | (7,010,889 | ) | | — |
| | (444 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (444 | ) |
| Transfer RSU to NQDC plan | — |
| | (43,860 | ) | | (3 | ) | | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Dividends on preferred stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (55 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (55 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | — |
| | 859,406,651 |
| | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | 38,629 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | (16,074 | ) | | $ | 22,559 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Index for Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile,” “we,” “our,” “us” or the “Company”), together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a leading provider of mobile communications services, including voice, messaging and data, under its flagship brands, T-Mobile and MetroPCS, in the United States (“U.S.”), Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. We provide mobile communications services primarily using 4G Long-Term Evolution (“LTE”) technology. We also offer a wide selection of wireless devices, including handsets, tablets and other mobile communication devices, and accessories for sale, as well as financing through Equipment Installment Plans (“EIP”) and leasing through JUMP! On Demand™. Additionally, we provide reinsurance for handset insurance policies and extended warranty contracts offered to our mobile communications customers.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements, include the balancesCompany changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019 and results of operations of T-Mobile and our consolidated subsidiaries. We operate as a single operating segment. We consolidate majority-owned subsidiaries overthe manner in which we exercise control, as well as variable interest entities (“VIE”) where we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary and VIEs, which cannot be deconsolidated, such as those related to Tower obligations. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified, such as those relating to the imputed discount on EIP receivables reclassified from Interest income to Otherit accounts for revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, to conform to the current year’s presentation. See “Change in Accounting Principle” below.2018.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires our management to make estimates and assumptions which affect the financial statements and accompanying notes. Examples include service revenues earned but not yet billed, service revenues billed but not yet earned, relative selling prices, allowances for credit losses and sales returns, discounts for imputed interest on EIP receivables, guarantee liabilities, losses incurred but not yet reported, tax liabilities, deferred income taxes including valuation allowances, useful lives of long-lived assets, cost estimates of asset retirement obligations, residual values on leased handsets, reasonably assured renewal terms for operating leases, stock-based compensation forfeiture rates, and fair value measurements, including those related to goodwill, spectrum licenses, intangible assets, beneficial interests in factoring and securitization transactions and derivative financial instruments. Estimates are based on historical experience, where applicable, and other assumptions which our management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates are inherently subject to judgment and actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
As of December 31, 2020, our Cash and cash equivalents were $10.4 billion compared to $1.5 billion at December 31, 2019.
Free Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow represents Net cash provided by operating activities less cash payments for Purchases of property and equipment, including Proceeds from sales of tower sites and Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions, less Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment. Free Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps, are non-GAAP financial measures utilized by our management, investors and analysts of our financial information to evaluate cash available to pay debt and provide further investment in the business.
The table below provides reconciliations of Free Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps to Net cash provided by operating activities, which we consider to be the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended December 31, | | 2020 Versus 2019 | | 2019 Versus 2018 |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | $ | | % | $ Change | | % Change |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | | | | | | | | $ | 8,640 | | | $ | 6,824 | | | $ | 3,899 | | | $ | 1,816 | | | 27 | % | | $ | 2,925 | | | 75 | % |
| Cash purchases of property and equipment | | | | | | | | | (11,034) | | | (6,391) | | | (5,541) | | | (4,643) | | | 73 | % | | (850) | | | 15 | % |
| Proceeds from sales of tower sites | | | | | | | | | — | | | 38 | | | — | | | (38) | | | (100) | % | | 38 | | | NM |
| Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions | | | | | | | | | 3,134 | | | 3,876 | | | 5,406 | | | (742) | | | (19) | % | | (1,530) | | | (28) | % |
| Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs | | | | | | | | | (82) | | | (28) | | | (212) | | | (54) | | | 193 | % | | 184 | | | (87) | % |
| Free Cash Flow | | | | | | | | | 658 | | | 4,319 | | | 3,552 | | | (3,661) | | | (85) | % | | 767 | | | 22 | % |
| Gross cash paid for the settlement of interest rate swaps | | | | | | | | | 2,343 | | | — | | | — | | | 2,343 | | | NM | | — | | | NM |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps | | | | | | | | | $ | 3,001 | | | $ | 4,319 | | | $ | 3,552 | | | $ | (1,318) | | | (31) | % | | $ | 767 | | | 22 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NM - Not Meaningful
Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps related to Merger financing, decreased $1.3 billion, or 31%. The decrease was primarily impacted by the following:
•Higher Cash purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of $440 million and $473 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, from network integration related to the Merger and the continued build-out of our nationwide 5G network; and
•Lower Proceeds related to our deferred purchase price from securitization transactions; partially offset by
•Higher Net cash provided by operating activities, as described above. Net cash provided by operating activities was impacted by the following:
•$1.5 billion and $442 million in payments for Merger-related costs for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
•$458 million in payments for supplemental employee payroll, third-party commissions and cleaning-related COVID-19 costs for the year ended December 31, 2020.
•The calculation of Free Cash Flow, excluding gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps, excludes the one-time impact of gross payments for the settlement of interest rate swaps related to Merger financing of $2.3 billion.
Borrowing Capacity
We maintain a financing arrangement with Deutsche Bank AG, which allows for up to $108 million in borrowings. Under the financing arrangement, we can effectively extend payment terms for invoices payable to certain vendors. As of December 31, 2020, there were no outstanding balances under such financing arrangement.
We also maintain vendor financing arrangements primarily with our main network equipment suppliers. Under the respective agreements, we can obtain extended financing terms. Additionally, we assumed financial liabilities with certain vendors in connection with the closing of the Merger and incurred additional financial liabilities with DISH at the closing of the Prepaid Transaction. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we repaid $481 million associated with the vendor financing arrangements and other financial liabilities, of which $342 million was associated with financial liabilities assumed in connection with the closing of the Merger. These payments are included in Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment and other financial liabilities, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the outstanding balance under the vendor financing arrangements and other financial liabilities was $240 million and $25 million, respectively.
On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, entered into a Credit Agreement with certain financial institutions named therein, providing for a $4.0 billion secured term loan facility (the “New Secured Term Loan Facility”) and a $4.0 billion revolving credit facility (the “New Revolving Credit Facility”). On September 16, 2020, we increased the aggregate commitment under the New Revolving Credit Facility to $5.5 billion through an amendment to the Credit Agreement. On October 9, 2020, we repaid at par all of the outstanding amounts under, and terminated, our New Secured Term Loan Facility. As of December 31, 2020, there was no outstanding balance under the New Revolving Credit Facility.
On October 30, 2020, we entered into a $5.0 billion senior secured term loan commitment with certain financial institutions. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on January 14, 2021, we issued an aggregate of $3.0 billion in Senior Notes. The senior secured term loan commitment was reduced by an amount equal to the aggregate gross proceeds of the Senior Notes, which reduced the commitment to $2.0 billion. Up to $2.0 billion of loans under the commitment may be drawn at any time (subject to customary conditions precedent) through June 30, 2021. If drawn, the facility matures in 364 days with one six-month extension exercisable at our discretion. Proceeds may be used for general corporate purposes and will accrue interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.25% per annum.
Debt Financing
As of December 31, 2020, our total debt and financing lease liabilities were $73.6 billion, excluding our tower obligations, of which $66.5 billion was classified as long-term debt and $1.4 billion was classified as long-term financing lease liabilities.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we issued short- and long-term debt for net proceeds of $54.2 billion and redeemed and repaid short- and long-term debt with an aggregate principal amount of $39.9 billion. Additionally, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we assumed certain indebtedness of Sprint totaling $31.8 billion.
On October 6, 2020, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued an aggregate of $4.0 billion in Senior Secured Notes bearing interest rates ranging from 2.050% to 3.300% and maturing in 2028 through 2051. On October 9, 2020, we used the net proceeds of $4.0 billion to repay at par all of the outstanding amounts under, and terminate, our New Secured Term Loan Facility.
On October 28, 2020, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued an aggregate of $4.75 billion in Senior Secured Notes bearing interest rates ranging from 2.250% to 3.600% and maturing in 2031 through 2060. We intend to use the net proceeds of $4.6 billion for general corporate purposes, which may include among other things, acquisitions of additional spectrum and refinancing existing indebtedness on an ongoing basis.
On October 30, 2020, we entered into a $5.0 billion senior secured term loan commitment with certain financial institutions. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on January 14, 2021, T-Mobile USA issued $1.0 billion of 2.250% Senior Notes due 2026, $1.0 billion of 2.625% Senior Notes due 2029, and $1.0 billion of 2.875% Senior Notes due 2031. We intend to use the net proceeds of $3.0 billion for general corporate purposes, which may include among other things, financing acquisitions of additional spectrum and refinancing existing indebtedness on an ongoing basis. A portion of the senior secured term loan commitments were reduced by an amount equal to the aggregate gross proceeds of the Senior Notes, which reduced the commitment to $2.0 billion. Up to $2.0 billion of loans under the commitment may be drawn at any time (subject to customary conditions precedent) through June 30, 2021. If drawn, the facility matures in 364 days with one six-month extension exercisable at our discretion. Proceeds may be used for general corporate purposes and will accrue interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.25% per annum.
For more information regarding our debt financing transactions, see Note 8 - Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Spectrum Auction
In March 2020, the FCC announced that we were the winning bidder of 2,384 licenses in Auction 103 (37/39 GHz and 47 GHz spectrum bands) for an aggregate price of $873 million, net of an incentive payment of $59 million. At the inception of Auction 103 in October 2019, we deposited $82 million with the FCC. Upon conclusion of Auction 103 in March 2020, we made a down payment of $93 million for the purchase price of the licenses won in the auction. On April 8, 2020, we paid the FCC the remaining $698 million of the purchase price for the licenses won in the auction. Prior to the Merger, the FCC announced that Sprint was the winning bidder of 127 licenses in Auction 103 (37/39 GHz and 47 GHz spectrum bands). All payments related to the licenses won were made by Sprint prior the Merger.
Interest Rate Lock Derivatives
In April 2020, in connection with the issuance of an aggregate of $19.0 billion in Senior Secured Notes, we terminated our interest rate lock derivative. At the time of termination, the interest rate lock derivatives were a liability of $2.3 billion, of which $1.2 billion was cash collateralized. Consequently, the net cash required to settle the interest rate lock derivatives was an additional $1.1 billion and was paid at termination.
For more information regarding the termination of our interest rate lock derivative, see Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Future Sources and Uses of Liquidity
We may seek additional sources of liquidity, including through the issuance of additional long-term debt in 2021, to continue to opportunistically acquire spectrum licenses or other assets in private party transactions or for the refinancing of existing long-term debt on an opportunistic basis. Excluding liquidity that could be needed for spectrum acquisitions, or for other assets, we expect our principal sources of funding to be sufficient to meet our anticipated liquidity needs for business operations for the next 12 months as well as our longer-term liquidity needs. Our intended use of any such funds is for general corporate purposes, including for capital expenditures, spectrum purchases, opportunistic investments and acquisitions, redemption of high yield callable debt and the execution of our integration plan.
We determine future liquidity requirements, for both operations and capital expenditures, based in large part upon projected financial and operating performance, and opportunities to acquire additional spectrum. We regularly review and update these projections for changes in current and projected financial and operating results, general economic conditions, the competitive landscape and other factors. We have incurred, and will incur, substantial expenses as a result of completing the Transactions, the Divestiture Transaction and compliance with the Government Commitments, and we are also expected to incur substantial restructuring expenses in connection with integrating and coordinating T-Mobile’s and Sprint’s businesses, operations, policies and procedures. While we have assumed that a certain level of Merger-related expenses will be incurred, factors beyond our control, including required consultation and negotiation with certain counterparties, could affect the total amount or the timing of these expenses. These expenses could exceed the costs historically borne by us and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. There are a number of additional risks and uncertainties, including those due to the impact of the Pandemic, that could cause our financial and operating results and capital requirements to differ materially from our projections, which could cause future liquidity to differ materially from our assessment. See “Risk Factors - Risk Related to our
Business and Wireless Industry - The Pandemic has adversely affected, and will continue to adversely affect, our business, liquidity, financial condition, and operating results.”
The indentures, supplemental indentures and credit agreements governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding financing leases, contain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Issuers or borrowers and the Guarantor Subsidiaries to incur more debt, pay dividends and make distributions on our common stock, make certain investments, repurchase stock, create liens or other encumbrances, enter into transactions with affiliates, enter into transactions that restrict dividends or distributions from subsidiaries, and merge, consolidate or sell, or otherwise dispose of, substantially all of their assets. Certain provisions of each of the credit agreements, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties restrict the ability of the Issuers or borrowers to loan funds or make payments to Parent. However, the Issuers or borrowers are allowed to make certain permitted payments to Parent under the terms of each of the credit agreements, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties. We were in compliance with all restrictive debt covenants as of December 31, 2020.
The Merger
In connection with the closing of the Merger, on April 1, 2020, we assumed Sprint’s liabilities, which include accounts payable and accrued liabilities, short-term debt, operating and financing lease liabilities, net pension plan liabilities, deferred tax liabilities and long-term debt with an aggregate fair value of $31.8 billion.
Shentel Wireless Asset Acquisition
Sprint PCS (specifically Sprint Spectrum L.P.) is party to a variety of publicly filed agreements with Shenandoah Personal Communications Company LLC (“Shentel”), pursuant to which Shentel is the exclusive provider of Sprint PCS’s wireless mobility communications network products in certain parts of Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Pursuant to one such agreement, the Sprint PCS Management Agreement, dated November 5, 1999 (as amended, supplemented and modified from time to time, the “Management Agreement”), Sprint PCS was granted an option to purchase Shentel’s wireless telecommunications assets used to provide services pursuant to the Management Agreement. On August 26, 2020, Sprint, now our indirect subsidiary, on behalf of and as the direct or indirect owner of Sprint PCS, exercised its option by delivering a binding notice of exercise to Shentel. T-Mobile’s exercise of its option triggered a requirement for the parties to engage three independent valuation providers (the “Valuation Providers”) to calculate the “entire business value” (the “Entire Business Value”) of such wireless telecommunications assets, pursuant to a formula and valuation process prescribed in the Management Agreement.
Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on February 1, 2021, in accordance with the Management Agreement and other agreed-upon terms, the Valuation Providers determined and calculated the Entire Business Value of Shentel’s wireless telecommunications assets used to provide services pursuant to the Management Agreement to be $2.1 billion, and correspondingly, the base purchase price for such wireless telecommunications assets shall be ninety percent (90%) of that Entire Business Value amount ($1.9 billion), subject to certain other purchase price adjustments prescribed by the Management Agreement and such additional purchase price adjustments agreed by the parties. The parties are negotiating the remaining outstanding terms of a definitive agreement to govern the purchase of Shentel’s wireless telecommunication assets and expect the transaction to close in the second quarter of 2021 after satisfying customary conditions to closing.
Financing Lease Facilities
We have entered into uncommitted financing lease facilities with certain partners that provide us with the ability to enter into financing leases for network equipment and services. As of December 31, 2020, we have committed to $5.1 billion of financing leases under these financing lease facilities, of which $1.2 billion was executed during the year ended December 31, 2020. We expect to enter into up to an additional $1.2 billion in financing lease commitments during the year ending December 31, 2021.
Capital Expenditures
Our liquidity requirements have been driven primarily by capital expenditures for spectrum licenses, the construction, expansion and upgrading of our network infrastructure and the integration of the networks, spectrum, technology, personnel, customer base and business practices of T-Mobile and Sprint. Property and equipment capital expenditures primarily relate to the integration of our acquired Sprint 2.5 GHz spectrum licenses and existing 600 MHz spectrum licenses as we build out our
nationwide 5G network. We expect the majority of our remaining capital expenditures related to these efforts to occur in 2021 and 2022, after which we expect capital expenditure requirements to reduce.
We expect cash purchases of property and equipment to range from $11.7 billion to $12.0 billion in 2021.
Dividends
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our credit facilities and the indentures and supplemental indentures governing our long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding financing leases, contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to declare or pay dividends on our common stock.
Contractual Obligations
In connection with the regulatory approvals of the Transactions, we made commitments to various state and federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice’s (the “DOJ”) and FCC.
The contractual commitments and purchase obligations of Sprint were assumed upon the completion of the Merger. These contractual commitments and purchase obligations are primarily commitments to purchase wireless devices, network services, equipment, software, marketing sponsorship agreements and other items in the ordinary course of business.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and borrowings as of December 31, 2020, and the timing and effect that such commitments are expected to have on our liquidity and capital requirements in future periods:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Less Than 1 Year | | 1 - 3 Years | | 4 - 5 Years | | More Than 5 Years | | Total |
Long-term debt (1) | $ | 4,486 | | | $ | 11,960 | | | $ | 9,891 | | | $ | 43,052 | | | $ | 69,389 | |
| Interest on long-term debt | 3,477 | | | 5,938 | | | 4,317 | | | 13,817 | | | 27,549 | |
| Financing lease liabilities, including imputed interest | 1,121 | | | 1,217 | | | 229 | | | 61 | | | 2,628 | |
Tower obligations (2) | 397 | | | 716 | | | 598 | | | 624 | | | 2,335 | |
| Operating lease liabilities, including imputed interest | 4,903 | | | 8,113 | | | 6,146 | | | 18,940 | | | 38,102 | |
Purchase obligations (3) | 5,033 | | | 4,462 | | | 2,392 | | | 1,723 | | | 13,610 | |
Spectrum leases and service credits (4) | 338 | | | 675 | | | 594 | | | 5,077 | | | 6,684 | |
| Total contractual obligations | $ | 19,755 | | | $ | 33,081 | | | $ | 24,167 | | | $ | 83,294 | | | $ | 160,297 | |
(1)Represents principal amounts of long-term debt to affiliates and third parties at maturity, excluding unamortized premiums, discounts, debt issuance costs, consent fees, and financing lease obligations. See Note 8 – Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. (2)Future minimum payments, including principal and interest payments, related to the tower obligations. See Note 9 – Tower Obligations of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. (3)The minimum commitment for certain obligations is based on termination penalties that could be paid to exit the contracts. Termination penalties are included in the above table as payments due as of the earliest we could exit the contract, typically in less than one year. For certain contracts that include fixed volume purchase commitments and fixed prices for various products, the purchase obligations are calculated using fixed volumes and contractually fixed prices for the products that are expected to be purchased. This table does not include open purchase orders as of December 31, 2020 under normal business purposes. See Note 18 – Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. (4)Spectrum lease agreements are typically for five to 10 years with automatic renewal provisions, bringing the total term of the agreements up to 30 years.
Certain commitments and obligations are included in the table based on the year of required payment or an estimate of the year of payment. Other long-term liabilities have been omitted from the table above due to the uncertainty of the timing of payments, combined with the lack of historical trends to predict future payments. See Note 20 – Additional Financial Information of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
The purchase obligations reflected in the table above are primarily commitments to purchase spectrum licenses, wireless devices, network services, equipment, software, marketing sponsorship agreements and other items in the ordinary course of business. These amounts do not represent our entire anticipated purchases in the future, but represent only those items for which we are contractually committed. Where we are committed to make a minimum payment to the supplier regardless of whether we take delivery, we have included only that minimum payment as a purchase obligation. The acquisition of spectrum licenses is subject to regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions.
Related Party Transactions
SoftBank
On February 20, 2020, T-Mobile, SoftBank and DT entered into a Letter Agreement as described in Note 2 - Business Combination. The Letter Agreement requires T-Mobile to issue to SoftBank 48,751,557 shares of T-Mobile common stock, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Letter Agreement, for no additional consideration, if certain conditions are met.
On June 22, 2020, we entered into a Master Framework Agreement and related transactions with SoftBank to facilitate the SoftBank Monetization as described in Note 14 - SoftBank Equity Transactionof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As of December 31, 2020, DT and SoftBank held, directly or indirectly, approximately 43.4% and 8.6%, respectively, of our outstanding common stock, with the remaining approximately 48.0% of our outstanding common stock held by other stockholders. As a result of the Proxy Agreements, DT has voting control as of December 31, 2020, over approximately 52.3% of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock. In addition, as provided for in the Master Framework Agreement, DT also holds certain call options over approximately 101.5 million shares of our common stock held by SoftBank Group Capital Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of SoftBank.
On July 27, 2020, in connection with the SoftBank Monetization, the Rights Offering exercise period closed, and on August 3, 2020, the Rights Offering closed, resulting in the sale of 19,750,000 shares of our common stock.
Marcelo Claure
On June 22, 2020, we entered into a Master Framework Agreement which provided for the purchase of shares of our common stock by Marcelo Claure, a member of our board of directors, from us at a specified price.
Brightstar
We had arrangements with Brightstar, a subsidiary of SoftBank, whereby Brightstar provided supply chain and inventory management services to us in our indirect channels.
Deutsche Telekom
We have related party transactions associated with DT or its affiliates in the ordinary course of business, including intercompany servicing and licensing.
On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we repaid our $4.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility with DT and repurchased from DT $4.0 billion of indebtedness to affiliates, consisting of $2.0 billion of 5.300% Senior Notes due
2021 and $2.0 billion of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024 as well as made an additional payment for requisite consents to DT of $13 million.
On July 4, 2020, we redeemed $1.25 billion aggregate principal amount of our 5.125% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2021.
For more information regarding our related party debt transactions, see Note 8 - Debtof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Disclosure of Iranian Activities under Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 added Section 13(r) to the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Section 13(r) requires an issuer to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports, as applicable, whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with designated natural persons or entities involved in terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Disclosure is required even where the activities, transactions or dealings are conducted outside the U.S. by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with applicable law, and whether or not the activities are sanctionable under U.S. law.
As of the date of this report, we are not aware of any activity, transaction or dealing by us or any of our affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2020, that requires disclosure in this report under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, except as set forth below with respect to affiliates that we do not control and that are our affiliates solely due to their common control with either DT or SoftBank. We have relied upon DT and SoftBank for information regarding their respective activities, transactions and dealings.
DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, is party to roaming and interconnect agreements with the following mobile and fixed line telecommunication providers in Iran, some of which are or may be government-controlled entities: Irancell Telecommunications Services Company, Telecommunication Kish Company, Mobile Telecommunication Company of Iran, and Telecommunication Infrastructure Company of Iran. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2020, DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, provided basic telecommunications services to three customers in Germany identified on the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List maintained by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control: Bank Melli, Bank Sepah, and Europäisch-Iranische Handelsbank. These services have been terminated or are in the process of being terminated.For the year ended December 31, 2020, gross revenues of all DT affiliates generated by roaming and interconnection traffic and telecommunications services with the Iranian parties identified herein were less than $0.1 million, and the estimated net profits were less than $0.1 million.
In addition, DT, through certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries that operate a fixed-line network in their respective European home countries (in particular Germany), provides telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to the Embassy of Iran in those European countries. Gross revenues and net profits recorded from these activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 were less than $0.1 million. We understand that DT intends to continue these activities.
Separately, SoftBank, through one of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, provides roaming services in Iran through Irancell Telecommunications Services Company. During the nine months from the acquisition of Sprint on April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, SoftBank had no gross revenues from such services and no net profit was generated. We understand that the SoftBank subsidiary intends to continue such services. This subsidiary also provides telecommunications services in the ordinary course of business to accounts affiliated with the Embassy of Iran in Japan. During the nine months from the acquisition of Sprint on April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, SoftBank estimates that gross revenues and net profit generated by such services were both under $0.1 million. We understand that the SoftBank subsidiary is obligated under contract and intends to continue such services.
In addition, SoftBank, through one of its non-U.S. indirect subsidiaries, provides office supplies to the Embassy of Iran in Japan. SoftBank estimates that gross revenue and net profit generated by such services during the nine months from the acquisition of Sprint on April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, were both under $0.1 million. We understand that the SoftBank subsidiary intends to continue such activities.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have arrangements, as amended from time to time, to sell certain EIP accounts receivable and service accounts receivable on a revolving basis as a source of liquidity. As of December 31, 2020, we derecognized net receivables of $2.5 billion upon sale through these arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition as they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Three of these policies, discussed below, are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors have reviewed and approved these critical accounting policies.
Depreciation
Our property and equipment balance represents a significant component of our consolidated assets. We record property and equipment at cost, and we generally depreciate property and equipment on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets. If all other factors were to remain unchanged, we expect that a one-year increase in the useful lives of our in-service property and equipment, exclusive of leased devices, would have resulted in a decrease of approximately $2.9 billion in our 2020 depreciation expense and that a one-year decrease in the useful life would have resulted in an increase of approximately $3.5 billion in our 2020 depreciation expense.
Evaluation of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment
Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, are not amortized but tested for potential impairment annually, as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate such assets might be impaired.
We test goodwill on a reporting unit basis by comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its book value. If the fair value exceeds the book value, then no impairment is measured. We have identified two reporting units for which discrete financial information is available and results are regularly reviewed by management: wireless and Layer3. The Layer3 reporting unit consists of the assets and liabilities of Layer3 TV, Inc., which was acquired in January 2018. The services provided by the Layer3 reporting unit are branded TVisionTM. The wireless reporting unit consists of the remaining assets and liabilities of T-Mobile US, Inc., excluding Layer3 TV, Inc. We separately evaluate these reporting units for impairment.
When assessing goodwill for impairment we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized would not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. We employed a qualitative approach to assess the wireless reporting unit. The fair value of the wireless reporting unit is determined using a market approach, which is based on market capitalization. We recognize market capitalization is subject to volatility and will monitor changes in market capitalization to determine whether declines, if any, necessitate an interim impairment review. In the event market capitalization does decline below its book value, we will consider the length, severity and reasons for the decline when assessing whether potential impairment exists, including considering whether a control premium should be added to the market capitalization. We believe short-term fluctuations in share price may not necessarily reflect the underlying
aggregate fair value. No events or change in circumstances have occurred that indicate the fair value of the wireless reporting unit may be below its carrying amount at December 31, 2020.
Concurrent with the consummation of the Merger, management also revisited the plans for our TVisionTM services offering and the integration of this offering with the Sprint customer base. Additionally, we expect our significantly enhanced spectrum position following the Merger will allow us to accelerate our in-home broadband internet service strategy. The enhanced in-home broadband opportunity, along with the acquisition of certain content rights, created a strategic shift in our TVisionTM services offering allowing us the ability to develop a video product which will be complementary to the in-home broadband offering. Based on these events and changes in circumstances, we determined that recoverability of the carrying amount of goodwill for the Layer3 reporting unit should be evaluated for impairment. We employed a quantitative approach to assess the Layer3 reporting unit. The fair value of the Layer3 reporting unit was determined using an income approach, which was based on estimated discounted future cash flows.
We made estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows, discount rates and long-term growth rates to determine the reporting unit’s estimated fair value. The key assumptions used were as follows:
•Expected cash flows underlying the TVisionTM business plan for the periods 2020 through 2025, which took into account assumptions for a delayed launch, estimates of subscribers for TVisionTM services, average revenue and content cost per subscriber, operating costs and capital expenditures;
•Cash flows beyond 2025 were projected to grow at a long-term growth rate estimated at 3%. Estimating a long-term growth rate requires significant judgment about future business strategies as well as micro- and macro-economic environments that are inherently uncertain; and
•We used a discount rate of 30% to risk adjust the cash flow projections in determining the estimated fair value.
The carrying value of the Layer3 reporting unit exceeded its estimated fair value as of June 30, 2020. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded an impairment loss of $218 million, which is included in Impairment expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. This impairment reduced the goodwill assigned to the Layer3 reporting unit to zero.
We test spectrum licenses for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with our management of the overall business at a
national level. We may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative
assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the estimated fair value of the intangible asset. If the estimated fair value of the spectrum licenses is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized. We estimate fair value using the Greenfield methodology, which is an income approach, to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The Greenfield methodology values the spectrum licenses by calculating the cash flow generating potential of a hypothetical start-up company that goes into business with no assets except the asset to be valued (in this case, spectrum licenses) and makes investments required to build an operation comparable to current use. The value of the spectrum licenses can be considered as equal to the present value of the cash flows of this hypothetical start-up company. We base the assumptions underlying the Greenfield methodology on a combination of market participant data and our historical results, trends and business plans. Future cash flows in the Greenfield methodology are based on estimates and assumptions of market participant revenues, EBITDA margin, network build-out period and a long-term growth rate for a market participant. The cash flows are discounted using a weighted average cost of capital.
The valuation approaches utilized to estimate fair value for the purposes of the impairment tests of goodwill and spectrum
licenses require the use of assumptions and estimates, which involve a degree of uncertainty. If actual results or future
expectations are not consistent with the assumptions, this may result in the recording of significant impairment charges on
goodwill or spectrum licenses. The most significant assumptions within the valuation models are the discount rate, revenues,
EBITDA margins, capital expenditures and long-term growth rate.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences are realized. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions within the carryforward periods available.
We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We assess whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position and adjust the unrecognized tax benefits in light of changes in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to economic risks in the normal course of business, primarily from changes in interest rates, including changes in investment yields and changes in spreads due to credit risk and other factors. These risks, along with other business risks, impact our cost of capital. Our policy is to manage exposure related to fluctuations in interest rates in order to manage capital costs, control financial risks and maintain financial flexibility over the long term. We have established interest rate risk limits that are closely monitored by measuring interest rate sensitivities of our debt portfolio. We do not foresee significant changes in the strategies used to manage market risk in the near future.
Certain potential sources of financing available to us, including our senior secured term loan commitment with certain financial institutions and New Revolving Credit Facility, bear interest that is indexed to LIBOR plus a fixed margin. As of December 31, 2020, we did not have outstanding balances under these facilities. See Note 8 - Debtof the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of T-Mobile US, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of T-Mobile US, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Changes in Accounting Principles
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019 and the manner in which it accounts for revenues in 2018.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded certain elements of the internal control over financial reporting of Sprint from its assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2020. Subsequent to the acquisition, the Company integrated certain elements of Sprint’s internal control over financial reporting and related processes into the Company’s existing systems, internal control over financial reporting and related processes. The Sprint controls that were not integrated have been excluded from management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. We have also excluded these elements of the internal
control over financial reporting of Sprint from our audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The excluded elements of Sprint represent controls over approximately 14% of consolidated assets and approximately 30% of the consolidated total revenues as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Acquisition of Sprint Corporation - Accounting and Valuation of the Acquired Spectrum License Portfolio
As described in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company completed its acquisition of Sprint Corporation for a total consideration of $40.8 billion on April 1, 2020. The Company measured the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value, which resulted in the recognition of $45.4 billion of Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) spectrum licenses, a portion of which relates to lease agreements (the “Agreements”) with various educational and non-profit institutions that provide the Company with the right to use FCC spectrum licenses (Educational Broadband Services or “EBS spectrum”) in the 2.5 GHz band. Management applied judgment in determining the Agreements enhance the overall value of the Company's owned spectrum licenses as the collective value is higher than the value of individual bands of spectrum within a specific geography. This enhanced value from combining owned and leased spectrum licenses is referred to as an aggregation premium, which is a component of the overall fair value of FCC spectrum licenses, which are recognized as indefinite-lived intangible assets. Management also applied judgment in estimating the overall value of the Spectrum License portfolio using the income approach, specifically a Greenfield model, which involved the use of key assumptions with respect to the discount rate, market share, estimated capital and operating expenditures, forecasted service revenue and long-term growth rate for a hypothetical market participant that enters the wireless industry and builds a nationwide wireless network.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the accounting and valuation of the acquired Spectrum License portfolio in the acquisition of Sprint Corporation is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management in determining the accounting for the leased EBS spectrum arrangements, as well as estimating the fair value of the acquired Spectrum License portfolio; (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s accounting for the leased EBS spectrum portion of the portfolio as well as evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to the discount rate, market share, estimated capital and operating expenditures, forecasted service revenue and long-term growth rate used in estimating the fair value of the acquired Spectrum License portfolio; and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the accounting for the leased EBS spectrum arrangements and estimating the fair value of the acquired Spectrum License portfolio. These procedures also included, among others, (i) reading the purchase agreement and Spectrum License lease agreements; (ii) evaluating management’s assessment related to the accounting for the leased EBS spectrum arrangements; and (iii) testing
management’s process for estimating the fair value of the acquired Spectrum License portfolio. Testing management’s process included evaluating the appropriateness of the valuation methodology, and evaluating the reasonableness of management’s significant assumptions related to the discount rate, market share, estimated capital and operating expenditures, forecasted service revenue and long-term growth rate. Evaluating the significant assumptions included considering (i) the cost of capital of comparable businesses and consistency with other valuations for the discount rate; (ii) industry factors and historical results for market share; (iii) historical results, and industry data for the estimated capital and operating expenditures and forecasted service revenue assumptions; and (iv) industry and market factors for the long-term growth rate. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating the reasonableness of the discount rate and long-term growth rate assumptions.
Acquisition of Sprint Corporation - Accounting for the Acquired Lease-out and Leaseback Arrangement with Crown Castle International Corp.
As described in Notes 2 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements, in the acquisition of Sprint Corporation, the Company measured the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value, which resulted in the recognition of property and equipment with a fair value of $2.8 billion and tower obligations related to amounts owed to Crown Castle International Corp. (“CCI”) under the leaseback of $1.1 billion. Additionally, $1.7 billion in other long-term liabilities were recognized associated with contract terms that are unfavorable to current market rates, which includes unfavorable terms associated with the fixed-price purchase option in 2037. Prior to the Merger, Sprint entered into a lease-out and leaseback arrangement with Global Signal Inc., a third party that was subsequently acquired by CCI, that conveyed to CCI the exclusive right to manage and operate approximately 6,400 tower sites via prepaid master lease. These agreements were assumed upon the close of the Merger, at which point the remaining term of the lease-out was approximately 17years with no renewal options. CCI has a fixed-price purchase option for all (but not less than all) of the leased or subleased sites for approximately $2.3 billion, exercisable one year prior to the expiration of the agreement and ending 120 days prior to the expiration of the agreement. The Company leases back a portion of the space at certain tower sites for an initial term of 10 years, followed by optional renewals at customary terms.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to accounting for the acquired lease-out and leaseback arrangement with CCI in the acquisition of Sprint Corporation is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management in determining the accounting to reflect the acquisition of the tower lease arrangement; (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s accounting for and presentation of the owned leased asset and related liabilities and identification of each unit of account within the transaction; and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the accounting for acquired lease-out and leaseback arrangement with CCI. These procedures also included, among others, (i) reading the purchase agreement and Global Signal Inc. lease agreements; (ii) evaluating management’s accounting for and presentation of the owned leased asset and related liabilities; and (iii) evaluating management’s identification of each unit of account within the transaction. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating management’s accounting assessment of the acquired lease-out and leaseback arrangement with CCI.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
February 23, 2021
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2001.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except share and per share amounts) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| Assets | | | |
| Current assets | | | |
| | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 10,385 | | | $ | 1,528 | |
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $194 and $61 | 4,254 | | | 1,888 | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount of $478 and $333 | 3,577 | | | 2,600 | |
| Accounts receivable from affiliates | 22 | | | 20 | |
| Inventory | 2,527 | | | 964 | |
| Prepaid expenses | 624 | | | 333 | |
| Other current assets | 2,496 | | | 1,972 | |
| | | |
| Total current assets | 23,885 | | | 9,305 | |
| Property and equipment, net | 41,175 | | | 21,984 | |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | 28,021 | | | 10,933 | |
| Financing lease right-of-use assets | 3,028 | | | 2,715 | |
| Goodwill | 11,117 | | | 1,930 | |
| Spectrum licenses | 82,828 | | | 36,465 | |
| Other intangible assets, net | 5,298 | | | 115 | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount of $127 and $66 | 2,031 | | | 1,583 | |
| | | |
| Other assets | 2,779 | | | 1,891 | |
| | | |
| Total assets | $ | 200,162 | | | $ | 86,921 | |
| Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | |
| Current liabilities | | | |
| | | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 10,196 | | | $ | 6,746 | |
| Payables to affiliates | 157 | | | 187 | |
| Short-term debt | 4,579 | | | 25 | |
| | | |
| Deferred revenue | 1,030 | | | 631 | |
| Short-term operating lease liabilities | 3,868 | | | 2,287 | |
| Short-term financing lease liabilities | 1,063 | | | 957 | |
| | | |
| Other current liabilities | 810 | | | 1,673 | |
| | | |
| Total current liabilities | 21,703 | | | 12,506 | |
| | | |
| Long-term debt | 61,830 | | | 10,958 | |
| Long-term debt to affiliates | 4,716 | | | 13,986 | |
| Tower obligations | 3,028 | | | 2,236 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 9,966 | | | 5,607 | |
| Operating lease liabilities | 26,719 | | | 10,539 | |
| Financing lease liabilities | 1,444 | | | 1,346 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Other long-term liabilities | 5,412 | | | 954 | |
| | | |
| Total long-term liabilities | 113,115 | | | 45,626 | |
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 18) | 0 | | 0 |
| Stockholders' equity | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, 2,000,000,000 shares authorized; 1,243,345,584 and 858,418,615 shares issued, 1,241,805,706 and 856,905,400 shares outstanding | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | 72,772 | | | 38,498 | |
| Treasury stock, at cost, 1,539,878 and 1,513,215 shares issued | (11) | | | (8) | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (1,581) | | | (868) | |
| Accumulated deficit | (5,836) | | | (8,833) | |
| | | |
| Total stockholders' equity | 65,344 | | | 28,789 | |
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 200,162 | | | $ | 86,921 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions, except share and per share amounts) | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Revenues | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Postpaid revenues | | | | | $ | 36,306 | | | $ | 22,673 | | | $ | 20,862 | |
| Prepaid revenues | | | | | 9,421 | | | 9,543 | | | 9,598 | |
| Wholesale revenues | | | | | 2,590 | | | 1,279 | | | 1,183 | |
| Roaming and other service revenues | | | | | 2,078 | | | 1,005 | | | 798 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total service revenues | | | | | 50,395 | | | 34,500 | | | 32,441 | |
| Equipment revenues | | | | | 17,312 | | | 9,840 | | | 10,009 | |
| Other revenues | | | | | 690 | | | 658 | | | 860 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total revenues | | | | | 68,397 | | | 44,998 | | | 43,310 | |
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below | | | | | 11,878 | | | 6,622 | | | 6,307 | |
| Cost of equipment sales, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below | | | | | 16,388 | | | 11,899 | | | 12,047 | |
| Selling, general and administrative | | | | | 18,926 | | | 14,139 | | | 13,161 | |
| Impairment expense | | | | | 418 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | 14,151 | | | 6,616 | | | 6,486 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total operating expenses | | | | | 61,761 | | | 39,276 | | | 38,001 | |
| Operating income | | | | | 6,636 | | | 5,722 | | | 5,309 | |
| Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | | | | | (2,483) | | | (727) | | | (835) | |
| Interest expense to affiliates | | | | | (247) | | | (408) | | | (522) | |
| Interest income | | | | | 29 | | | 24 | | | 19 | |
| Other expense, net | | | | | (405) | | | (8) | | | (54) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total other expense, net | | | | | (3,106) | | | (1,119) | | | (1,392) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations before income taxes | | | | | 3,530 | | | 4,603 | | | 3,917 | |
| Income tax expense | | | | | (786) | | | (1,135) | | | (1,029) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | | | | 2,744 | | | 3,468 | | | 2,888 | |
| Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | | | 320 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Net income | | | | | $ | 3,064 | | | $ | 3,468 | | | $ | 2,888 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | $ | 3,064 | | | $ | 3,468 | | | $ | 2,888 | |
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges, net of tax effect of $(250), $(187), and $(115) | | | | | (723) | | | (536) | | | (332) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Unrealized gain on foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax effect of $1, $0 and $0 | | | | | 4 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net unrecognized gain (loss) on pension and other postretirement benefits, net of tax effect of $2, $0 and $0 | | | | | 6 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Other comprehensive loss | | | | | (713) | | | (536) | | | (332) | |
| Total comprehensive income | | | | | $ | 2,351 | | | $ | 2,932 | | | $ | 2,556 | |
| Earnings per share | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | | | | | $ | 2.40 | | | $ | 4.06 | | | $ | 3.40 | |
| Discontinued operations | | | | | 0.28 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Basic | | | | | $ | 2.68 | | | $ | 4.06 | | | $ | 3.40 | |
| Diluted earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | | | | | $ | 2.37 | | | $ | 4.02 | | | $ | 3.36 | |
| Discontinued operations | | | | | 0.28 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Diluted | | | | | $ | 2.65 | | | $ | 4.02 | | | $ | 3.36 | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | | | | 1,144,206,326 | | | 854,143,751 | | | 849,744,152 | |
| Diluted | | | | | 1,154,749,428 | | | 863,433,511 | | | 858,290,174 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Operating activities | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | $ | 3,064 | | | $ | 3,468 | | | $ | 2,888 | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | | | 14,151 | | | 6,616 | | | 6,486 | |
| Stock-based compensation expense | | | | | 694 | | | 495 | | | 424 | |
| Deferred income tax expense | | | | | 822 | | | 1,091 | | | 980 | |
| Bad debt expense | | | | | 602 | | | 307 | | | 297 | |
| Losses from sales of receivables | | | | | 36 | | | 130 | | | 157 | |
| Deferred rent expense | | | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 26 | |
| Losses on redemption of debt | | | | | 371 | | | 19 | | | 122 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Impairment expense | | | | | 418 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | | | | | (3,273) | | | (3,709) | | | (4,617) | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables | | | | | (1,453) | | | (1,015) | | | (1,598) | |
| Inventories | | | | | (2,222) | | | (617) | | | (201) | |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | | | | | 3,465 | | | 1,896 | | | 0 | |
| Other current and long-term assets | | | | | (402) | | | (144) | | | (181) | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | | | (2,123) | | | 17 | | | (867) | |
| Short and long-term operating lease liabilities | | | | | (3,699) | | | (2,131) | | | 0 | |
| Other current and long-term liabilities | | | | | (2,178) | | | 144 | | | (69) | |
| Other, net | | | | | 367 | | | 257 | | | 52 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | | | | 8,640 | | | 6,824 | | | 3,899 | |
| Investing activities | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment, including capitalized interest of $440, $473 and $362 | | | | | (11,034) | | | (6,391) | | | (5,541) | |
| Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits | | | | | (1,333) | | | (967) | | | (127) | |
| Proceeds from sales of tower sites | | | | | 0 | | | 38 | | | 0 | |
| Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions | | | | | 3,134 | | | 3,876 | | | 5,406 | |
| Net cash related to derivative contracts under collateral exchange arrangements | | | | | 632 | | | (632) | | | 0 | |
| Acquisition of companies, net of cash and restricted cash acquired | | | | | (5,000) | | | (31) | | | (338) | |
| Proceeds from the divestiture of prepaid business | | | | | 1,224 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other, net | | | | | (338) | | | (18) | | | 21 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | | | | | (12,715) | | | (4,125) | | | (579) | |
| Financing activities | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | | | | | 35,337 | | | 0 | | | 2,494 | |
| Payments of consent fees related to long-term debt | | | | | (109) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Proceeds from borrowing on revolving credit facility | | | | | 0 | | | 2,340 | | | 6,265 | |
| Repayments of revolving credit facility | | | | | 0 | | | (2,340) | | | (6,265) | |
| Repayments of financing lease obligations | | | | | (1,021) | | | (798) | | | (700) | |
| Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment and other financial liabilities | | | | | (481) | | | (775) | | | (300) | |
| Repayments of long-term debt | | | | | (20,416) | | | (600) | | | (3,349) | |
| Issuance of common stock | | | | | 19,840 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Repurchases of common stock | | | | | (19,536) | | | 0 | | | (1,071) | |
| Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt | | | | | 18,743 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Repayments of short-term debt | | | | | (18,929) | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Tax withholdings on share-based awards | | | | | (439) | | | (156) | | | (146) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs | | | | | (82) | | | (28) | | | (212) | |
| Other, net | | | | | 103 | | | (17) | | | (52) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | | | 13,010 | | | (2,374) | | | (3,336) | |
| Change in cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash | | | | | 8,935 | | | 325 | | | (16) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of period | | | | | 1,528 | | | 1,203 | | | 1,219 | |
| End of period | | | | | $ | 10,463 | | | $ | 1,528 | | | $ | 1,203 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except shares) | | | Common Stock Outstanding | | Treasury Shares at Cost | | Par Value and Additional Paid-in Capital | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Accumulated Deficit | | Total Stockholders' Equity |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | | | 859,406,651 | | | $ | (4) | | | $ | 38,629 | | | $ | 8 | | | $ | (16,074) | | | $ | 22,559 | |
| Net income | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 2,888 | | | 2,888 | |
| Other comprehensive loss | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (332) | | | — | | | (332) | |
| Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | — | | | 473 | | | — | | | — | | | 473 | |
| Exercise of stock options | | | 187,965 | | | — | | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | 3 | |
| Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan | | | 2,011,794 | | | — | | | 103 | | | — | | | — | | | 103 | |
| Issuance of vested restricted stock units | | | 7,448,148 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Issuance of restricted stock awards | | | 225,799 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options | | | (2,321,827) | | | — | | | (146) | | | — | | | — | | | (146) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Repurchases of common stock | | | (16,738,758) | | | — | | | (1,054) | | | — | | | — | | | (1,054) | |
| Transfer RSU to NQDC plan | | | (39,455) | | | (2) | | | 2 | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
Prior year Retained Earnings(1) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (8) | | | 232 | | | 224 | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2018 | | | 850,180,317 | | | (6) | | | 38,010 | | | (332) | | | (12,954) | | | 24,718 | |
| Net income | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,468 | | | 3,468 | |
| Other comprehensive loss | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (536) | | | — | | | (536) | |
| Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | — | | | 517 | | | — | | | — | | | 517 | |
| Exercise of stock options | | | 85,083 | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | |
| Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan | | | 2,091,650 | | | — | | | 124 | | | — | | | — | | | 124 | |
| Issuance of vested restricted stock units | | | 6,685,950 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Issuance of restricted stock awards | | | (24,682) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options | | | (2,094,555) | | | — | | | (156) | | | — | | | — | | | (156) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transfer RSU from NQDC plan | | | (18,363) | | | (2) | | | 2 | | | — | | | — | | | 0 | |
Prior year Retained Earnings(1) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 653 | | | 653 | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2019 | | | 856,905,400 | | | (8) | | | 38,498 | | | (868) | | | (8,833) | | | 28,789 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,064 | | | 3,064 | |
| Other comprehensive loss | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (713) | | | — | | | (713) | |
| Executive put option | | | (342,000) | | | — | | | 1 | | | — | | | — | | | 1 | |
| Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | — | | | 750 | | | — | | | — | | | 750 | |
| Exercise of stock options | | | 906,295 | | | — | | | 48 | | | — | | | — | | | 48 | |
| Stock issued for employee stock purchase plan | | | 2,144,036 | | | — | | | 148 | | | — | | | — | | | 148 | |
| Issuance of vested restricted stock units | | | 13,263,434 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares withheld related to net share settlement of stock awards and stock options | | | (4,441,107) | | | — | | | (439) | | | — | | | — | | | (439) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transfer RSU from NQDC plan | | | (26,662) | | | (3) | | | 3 | | | — | | | — | | | 0 | |
Shares issued in secondary offering(2) | | | 198,314,426 | | | — | | | 19,766 | | | — | | | — | | | 19,766 | |
Shares repurchased from SoftBank(3) | | | (198,314,426) | | | — | | | (19,536) | | | — | | | — | | | (19,536) | |
| Merger consideration | | | 373,396,310 | | | — | | | 33,533 | | | — | | | — | | | 33,533 | |
Prior year Retained Earnings(1) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (67) | | | (67) | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2020 | | | 1,241,805,706 | | | $ | (11) | | | $ | 72,772 | | | $ | (1,581) | | | $ | (5,836) | | | $ | 65,344 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(2)Shares issued includes 5.0 million shares purchased by Marcelo Claure.
(3)In connection with the SoftBank Monetization (as defined below), we received a payment of $304 million from SoftBank (as defined below). This amount, net of tax, was treated as a reduction of the purchase price of the shares acquired from SoftBank and was recorded as Additional paid-in capital.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Index for Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile,” “we,” “our,” “us” or the “Company”), together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a leading provider of mobile communications services, including voice, messaging and data, under its flagship brands, T-Mobile and Metro™ by T-Mobile ("Metro by T-Mobile"), in the United States, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Substantially all of our revenues were earned in, and substantially all of our long-lived assets are located in, the U.S., Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. We provide mobile communications services primarily using our 4G Long-Term Evolution (“LTE”) network and our 5G technology network. We also offer a wide selection of wireless devices, including handsets, tablets and other mobile communication devices, and accessories for sale, as well as financing through Equipment Installment Plans (“EIP”) and leasing through JUMP! On Demand™. Additionally, we provide reinsurance for device insurance policies and extended warranty contracts offered to our mobile communications customers.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the balances and results of operations of T-Mobile and our consolidated subsidiaries. We consolidate majority-owned subsidiaries over which we exercise control, as well as variable interest entities (“VIE”) where we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary and VIEs, which cannot be deconsolidated, such as those related to Tower obligations. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. We operate as a single operating segment.
On April 29, 2018, we entered into a Business Combination Agreement (the “Business Combination Agreement”) to merge with Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”) in an all-stock transaction at a fixed exchange ratio of 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock for each share of Sprint common stock, or 9.75 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock (the “Merger”). On April 1, 2020, we completed the Merger and acquired Sprint (see Note 2 - Business Combination).
On July 26, 2019, pursuant to the requirement as set forth in the U.S. Department of Justice’s (the “DOJ”) complaint and proposed final judgement (the “Consent Decree”), T-Mobile entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Sprint and DISH Network Corporation (“DISH”). Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement and upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, on July 1, 2020, DISH acquired the prepaid wireless business operated under the Boost Mobile and Sprint prepaid brands (excluding the Assurance brand Lifeline customers and the prepaid wireless customers of Shenandoah Telecommunications Company and Swiftel Communications, Inc.), including customer accounts, inventory, contracts, intellectual property and certain other specified assets (the “Prepaid Business”) and assumed certain related liabilities (the “Prepaid Transaction”). Upon closing of the Prepaid Transaction, we received $1.4 billion from DISH, subject to a working capital adjustment.
The revenues and expenses of the Prepaid Business are presented as discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires our management to make estimates and assumptions which affect the financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are based on historical experience, where applicable, and other assumptions which our management believes are reasonable under the circumstances, including but not limited to the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed through the Merger with Sprint and the potential impacts arising from the COVID-19 pandemic (the “Pandemic”). These estimates are inherently subject to judgment and actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.
Business Combination
Assets acquired and liabilities assumed as part of a business combination are generally recorded at their fair value at the date of acquisition. The excess of purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. Determining fair value of identifiable assets, particularly intangibles, and liabilities acquired requires management to make estimates, which are based on all available information and in some cases assumptions with respect to the timing and amount of
future revenues and expenses associated with an asset or liability. See Note 2 – Business Combination for further discussion of the Merger between T-Mobile and Sprint.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid money market funds and U.S. Treasury securities with remaining maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase.
Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consistconsists primarily of amounts currently due from customers (e.g., for wireless services and monthly device lease payments), device insurance administrators, wholesale partners, other carriers and third-party retail channels. Accounts receivable not held for sale are reportedpresented in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at the balance sheet atamortized cost basis (i.e., the receivables’ outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs andwrite-offs), net of the allowance for expected credit losses. Accounts receivable held for sale are reported at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. We have an arrangement to sell the majoritycertain of our customer service accounts receivable on a revolving basis, which are treated as sales of financial assets.
Equipment Installment Plan Receivables
We offer certain retail customers the option to pay for their devices and other purchases in installments, generally over a period of up to 24 months using an EIP. EIP receivables not held for sale are reportedpresented in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at the amortized cost basis (i.e., the receivables’ unpaid principal balance sheet at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs,write-offs and unamortized discounts), net of the allowance for expected credit losses and unamortized discounts. Receivables held for sale are reported at the lower of amortized cost or fair value.losses. At the time of an installment sale, we impute a discount for interest if the term exceeds 12 months as there is no stated rate of interest on the EIPreceivables. The receivables and record the EIP receivablesare recorded at their present value, which is determined by discounting expected future cash payments at the imputed interest rate. The difference between the present value of the EIP receivables and their face amountThis adjustment results in a discount or reduction in transaction price which is recorded as a direct reductionallocated to the carrying value with a corresponding reduction to equipment
performance obligations and reduces Service revenues and Equipment revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. We determine theThe imputed discount rate based primarily onis the current market interest ratesrate and is predominately comprised of the estimated credit risk onunderlying the EIP receivables. As a result, we do not recognize a separate valuation allowance atreceivable, reflecting the time of issuance as the effects of uncertainty about future cash flows are included in the initial present value measurementestimated credit worthiness of the receivable.customer. The imputed discount on EIP receivables is amortized over the financed installment term using the effective interest method and recognized as Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Subsequent to the initial determination of the imputed discount, we assess the need for and, if necessary, recognize an allowance for credit losses to the extent the amount of estimated probable losses on the gross EIP receivable balances exceed the remaining unamortized imputed discount balances.
The current portion of the EIP receivables is included in Equipment installment plan receivables, net and the long-term portion of the EIP receivables is included in Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have an arrangement to sell certain EIP receivables on a revolving basis, which are treated as sales of financial assets.
Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain an allowance for expected credit losses and determine its appropriateness through an established process that assesses the lifetime credit losses inherent in our receivables portfolio. We develop and document our allowance methodology at the portfolio segment level - accounts receivable portfolio and EIP receivable portfolio segments. Whilethat we attribute portions of the allowanceexpect to incur related to our respective accounts receivable and EIP portfolio segments, the entire allowance is available to absorb credit losses inherent in the total receivables portfolio.
Our process involves procedures to appropriately consider the unique risk characteristics of our accounts receivable and EIP receivable portfolio segments. For each portfolio segment, losses are estimated collectively for groups of receivables with similar characteristics. Our allowance levels are influenced by receivable volumes, receivable delinquency status, historical loss experience and other conditions influencingthat affect loss expectations, such as changes in credit and collections policies and forecasts of macro-economic conditions. While we attribute portions of the allowance to our respective accounts receivable and EIP portfolio segments, the entire allowance is available to credit losses related to the total receivable portfolio.
We consider a receivable past due and delinquent when a customer has not paid us by the contractually specified payment due date. Account balances are written off against the allowance for credit losses if collection efforts are unsuccessful and the receivable balance is deemed uncollectible (customer default), based on factors such as customer credit ratings as well as the length of time the amounts are past due.
If there is a deterioration of our customers’ financial condition or if future actual default rates on receivables in general
differ from those currently anticipated, we will adjust our allowance for credit losses accordingly, which may materially affect our financial results in the period the adjustments are made.
Inventories
Inventories consist primarily of wireless devices and accessories, which are valued at the lower of cost or market.net realizable value. Cost is determined using standard cost which approximates average cost. Shipping and handling costs paid to wireless device and accessories vendors andas well as costs to refurbish used devices recovered through our device upgrade programs are included in the standard cost of inventory. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of disposal and transportation. We record inventory write-downs to net realizable value for obsolete and slow-moving items based on inventory turnover trends and historical experience.
Deferred Purchase Price Assets
In connection with the sales of certain service and EIP accounts receivable pursuant to the sale arrangements, we have deferred purchase price assets measured at fair value that are based on a discounted cash flow model using unobservable Level 3 inputs, including estimated customer default rates and credit worthiness. See Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables for further information.
Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets include assets that do not have indefinite lives, such as property and equipment and other intangible assets. Substantially all of our long-lived assets are located in the U.S., including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. We assess potential impairments to our long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If any indicators of impairment are present, we test recoverability. The carrying value of a long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset group. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the asset or asset group’s carrying amount, then an impairment loss is recorded, measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or asset group exceeds its fair value.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of buildings and equipment, wireless communicationcommunications systems, leasehold improvements, capitalized software, leased wireless devices and construction in progress. Buildings and equipment include certain network server equipment. Wireless communicationcommunications systems include assets to operate our wireless network and IT data centers, including tower assets and leasehold improvements and assets related to the liability for the retirement of long-lived assets and capital leases.assets. Leasehold improvements include asset improvements other than those related to the wireless network.
Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairments, if any, in Property and equipment, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We generally depreciate property and equipment over the period the property and equipment provide economic benefit.benefit using the straight-line method. Depreciable life studies are performed periodically to confirm the appropriateness of usefuldepreciable lives for certain categories of property and equipment. These studies take into account actual usage, physical wear and tear, replacement history and assumptions about technology evolution. When these factors indicate the useful life of an asset is different from the previous assessment, the remaining book value is depreciated prospectively over the adjusted remaining
estimated useful life. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the related lease term.
We introduced JUMP! On Demand, which allows customers to lease a device over a period of up to 18 months and upgrade it for a new device up to one time per month. To date, all of our leased devices were classified as operating leases. At operating lease inception, leased wireless devices are transferred from inventory to property and equipment. Leased wireless devices are depreciated to their estimated residual value over the period expected to provide utility to us, which is generally shorter than the lease term and considers expected losses. Revenues associated with the leased wireless devices, net of incentives, are generally recognized over the lease term. Upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers must return or purchase their device. Returned devices transferred from Property and equipment, net are recorded as inventory and are valued at the lower of cost or market with any write-down to market recognized as Cost of equipment sales in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Costs of major replacements and improvements are capitalized. Repair and maintenance expenditures which do not enhance or extend the asset’s useful life are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Construction costs, labor and overhead incurred in the expansion or enhancement of our wireless network are capitalized. Capitalization commences with pre-construction period administrative and technical activities, which includesinclude obtaining leases, zoning approvals and building permits, and ceases at the point at which the asset is ready for its intended use. We capitalize interest associated with the acquisition or construction of certain property and equipment. Capitalized interest is reported as a reduction in interest expense and depreciated over the useful life of the related assets.
Future obligations related to capital leases are included in Short-term debt and Long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Depreciation of assets held under capital leases is included in Depreciation and amortization expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
We record an asset retirement obligation for the estimated fair value of legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related asset in the period in which the obligation is incurred. In periods subsequent to initial measurement, we recognize changes in the liability resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or the amount of the original estimate. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset. Our obligations relate primarily
to certain legal obligations to remediate leased property on which our network infrastructure and administrative assets are located.
We capitalize certain costs incurred in connection with developing or acquiring internal use software. Capitalization of software costs commences once the final selection of the specific software solution has been made and management authorizes and commits to funding the software project.project and ceases once the project is ready for its intended use. Capitalized software costs are included in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as maintenance and training costs, are expensed as incurred.
Device Leases
Through the Merger, we acquired device lease contracts in which Sprint is the lessor (the “Sprint Flex Lease Program”), substantially all of which are classified as operating leases, as well as the associated fixed assets (i.e., the leased devices). These leased devices were recorded as fixed assets at their acquisition date fair value and presented within Property and equipment, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Our leasing programs (“Leasing Programs”), which include JUMP! On Demand and the Sprint Flex Lease Program acquired through the Merger, allow customers to lease a device (handset or tablet) over a period of, generally, 18 months and upgrade it for a new device when eligibility requirements are met. We depreciate leased devices to their estimated residual value, on a group basis, using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the device. The estimated useful life reflects the period for which we estimate the group of leased devices will provide utility to us, which may be longer than the initial lease term based on customer options in the Sprint Flex Lease program to renew the lease on a month-to-month basis after the initial lease term concludes. In determining the estimated useful life, we consider the lease term (e.g., 18 months and month-to-month renewal options for the Sprint Flex Lease Program), trade-in activity and write-offs for lost and stolen devices. Lost and stolen devices are incorporated into the estimates of depreciation expense and recognized as an adjustment to accumulated depreciation when the loss event occurs. Our policy of using the group method of depreciation has been applied to acquired leased devices as well as leases originated subsequent to the Merger. Acquired leased devices are grouped based on the age of the device. Revenues associated with the leased wireless devices, net of lease incentives, are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
For arrangements in which we are the lessor of wireless devices, we separate lease and non-lease components.
Upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers in the JUMP! On Demand lease program must return or purchase their device, and customers in the Sprint Flex Lease Program have the option to return or purchase their device or to renew their lease on a month-to-month basis. The purchase price of the device is established at lease commencement and is based on the type of device leased and any down payment made. The Leasing Programs do not contain any residual value guarantees or variable lease payments, and there are no restrictions or covenants imposed by these leases. Returned devices, including those received upon device upgrade, are transferred from Property and equipment, net to Inventory on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with any write-down recognized as Cost of equipment sales in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Other Intangible Assets
Intangible assets that do not have indefinite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Customer lists and the Sprint trade name are amortized using the sum-of-the-years-digitssum-of-the-years digits method over the expected period in which the relationshipasset is expected to contribute to future cash flows. The remaining finite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill
Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is allocated to our 2 reporting units, wireless and Layer3.
Spectrum Licenses
Spectrum licenses are carried at costs incurred to acquire the spectrum licenses and the costs to prepare the spectrum licenses for their intended use, such as costs to clear acquired spectrum licenses. The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issues spectrum licenses which provide us with the exclusive right to utilize designated radio frequency spectrum within specific geographic service areas to provide wireless communicationcommunications services. While spectrum licenses are issued for a fixed period of time, typically for up to fifteen15 years, the FCC has granted license renewals routinely and at a nominal cost. The spectrum licenses held by us expire at various dates. We believe we will be able to meet all requirements necessary to secure
renewal of our spectrum licenses at nominal costs. Moreover, we determined there are currently no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors that limit the useful lives of our spectrum licenses. Therefore, we determined the spectrum licenses should be treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets.
At times, we enter into agreements to sell or exchange spectrum licenses. Upon entering into the arrangement, if the transaction has been deemed to have commercial substance, spectrum licenses are reviewed for impairment andimpairment. The licenses are transferred at their carrying value, net ofas adjusted for any impairment recognized, to assets held for sale, which is included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets until approval and completion of the exchange or sale. Upon closing of the transaction, spectrum licenses acquired as part of an exchange of nonmonetary assets are valuedrecorded at fair value and the difference between the fair value of the spectrum licenses obtained, bookcarrying value of the spectrum licenses transferred and cash paid, if any, is recognized as a gain and included in GainsGain (loss) on disposal of spectrum licenses included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Our fair value estimates of spectrum licenses are based on information for which there is little or no observable market data. If the transaction lacks commercial substance or the fair value is not measurable, the acquired spectrum licenses are recorded at the bookour carrying value of the spectrum assets transferred or exchanged.
Spectrum Leases
Through the Merger, the Company acquired lease agreements (the “Agreements”) with various educational and non-profit institutions that provide us with the right to use FCC spectrum licenses (Educational Broadband Services or “EBS spectrum”) in the 2.5 GHz band. In addition to the Agreements with educational institutions and private owners who hold the licenses, the Company also acquired direct ownership of spectrum licenses previously acquired by Sprint through government auctions or other acquisitions.
The Agreements with educational and certain non-profit institutions are typically for five to 10 years with automatic renewal provisions, bringing the total term of the agreement up to 30 years. A majority of the Agreements include a right of first refusal to acquire, lease or otherwise use the license at the end of the automatic renewal periods.
Leased FCC spectrum licenses are recorded as executory contracts whereby, as a result of business combination accounting, an intangible asset or liability is recorded reflecting the extent to which contractual terms are favorable or unfavorable to current market rates. These intangible assets or liabilities are amortized over the estimated remaining useful life of the lease agreements. Contractual lease payments are recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the arrangement, including renewals, and are presented in Costs of services within our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
The Agreements enhance the overall value of the Company’s owned spectrum licenses as the collective value is higher than the value of individual bands of spectrum within a specific geography. This value is derived from the ability to provide wireless service to customers across large geographic areas and maintain the same or similar wireless connectivity quality. This enhanced value from combining owned and leased spectrum licenses is referred to as an aggregation premium.
The aggregation premium is a component of the overall fair value of our owned FCC spectrum licenses, which are recorded as indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Impairment
We assess the carrying value of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, for potential impairment annually as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate such assets might be impaired.
When assessing goodwill for impairment, we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the single2 reporting unitunits, wireless and Layer3, is less than its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying
amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized would not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
We test our spectrum licenses for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with our management of the overall business at a national level. We may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the estimated fair value of the intangible asset. If the estimated fair value of the spectrum licenses is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. We estimate fair value using the Greenfield methodology, which is an income approach based on discounted cash flows associated with the intangible asset, to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions.
Restricted Cash
Certain provisions of our debt agreements require us to maintain specified cash collateral balances. Amounts associated with these balances are considered to be restricted cash and are included within Other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Guarantee Liabilities
We offer a device trade-in program, Just Upgrade My Phone (“JUMP!”), which provides eligible customers a specified-price trade-in right to upgrade their device. Upon enrollment, participating customers must finance the purchase of a device on an EIP and have a qualifying T-Mobile monthly wireless service plan, which is treated as a single multiple-element arrangement when entered into at or near the same time.plan. Upon a qualifying JUMP! program upgrade, the customer’s remaining EIP balance is settled provided they trade-in their eligible used device in good working condition and purchase a new device from us on a new EIP.
For customers who enroll in JUMP!, we recognize a liability and reduce revenue for the portion of revenue which represents the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee. The guarantee liability is valued based on various economic and customer behavioral assumptions, which requires judgment, including estimating the customer's remaining EIP balance at trade-in, the expected fair value of the used device at trade-in, and the probability and timing of trade-in. We assess our guarantee liability at each reporting date to determine if facts and circumstances would indicate the incurrence of an incremental contingent liability is probable and if so, reasonably estimable. The recognition and subsequent adjustments of the contingent guarantee liability as a result of these assessments are recorded as adjustments to revenue. When customers upgrade their device, the difference between the EIP balance credit to the customer and the fair value of the returned device is recorded against the guarantee liabilities. All assumptions are reviewed periodically.
Fair Value Measurements
We carry certain assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The three-tier hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value, which prioritizes the inputs based on the observability as of the measurement date, is as follows:
| |
Level 1 | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; |
| |
Level 2 | Observable inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; and |
| |
Level 3 | Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require us to develop assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 Observable inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; and
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require us to develop assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the placement of assets and liabilities being measured within the fair value hierarchy.
The carrying values of cashCash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accountsAccounts receivable, accountsAccounts receivable from affiliates, Accounts payable and accounts payableaccrued liabilities and borrowings under our vendor financing arrangements approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The carrying values of EIP receivables approximate fair value as the receivables are recorded at their present value netusing an imputed interest rate. With the exception of unamortized discount and allowance for credit losses. Therecertain long-term fixed-rate debt, there were no financial instruments with a carrying value materially different from their fair value, based on quoted market prices or ratesvalue. See Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements for a comparison of the same or similar instruments, or internal valuation models.carrying values and fair values of our short-term and long-term debt.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivative financial instruments primarily relate to embedded derivatives for certain components of the reset feature of the Senior Reset Notes to affiliates, which are required to be bifurcatedrecognized as either assets or liabilities and are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheetsmeasured at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized in Interest expense to affiliates in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. We do not enter into derivative positionsuse derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges associated with forecasted debt issuances, changes in fair value are reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss until reclassified into Interest expense in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings, generally over the life of the related debt. Unrealized gains on derivatives designated in qualifying cash flow hedge relationships are recorded at fair value as assets, and unrealized losses are recorded at fair value as liabilities.
Revenue Recognition (Effective January 1, 2018)
We primarily generate our revenue from providing wireless services to customers and selling or leasing devices and accessories. We offer our wireless services and devices toOur contracts with customers which may be comprised of multiple contracts entered into with a customer at or near the same time. In recognizing revenue, we assess such agreements as a single bundled arrangement that may involve multiple deliverables,performance obligations, which include wireless services, wireless devices or a combination thereof, and we allocate revenuethe transaction price between each deliverableperformance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price.
Significant Judgments
The most significant judgments affecting the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with our customers include the following items:
•Revenue for service contracts that we assess are not probable of collection is not recognized until the contract is completed or terminated and cash is received. Collectibility is re-assessed when there is a significant change in facts or circumstances. Our assessment of collectibility considers whether we may limit our exposure to credit risk through our right to stop transferring additional service in the event the customer is delinquent as well as certain contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses” above, for additional discussion on how we assess credit risk.
•Promotional EIP bill credits offered to a customer on an equipment sale that are paid over time and are contingent on the customer maintaining a service contract may result in an extended service contract based on whether a substantive penalty is deemed to exist. Determining whether contingent EIP bill credits result in a substantive termination penalty may require significant judgment.
•The identification of distinct performance obligations within our service plans may require significant judgment.
•Revenue is recorded net of costs paid to another party for performance obligations where we arrange for the other party to transfer goods or services to the customer (i.e., when we are acting as an agent). For example, performance obligations relating to services provided by third-party content providers where we neither control a right to the content provider’s service nor control the underlying service itself are presented net because we are acting as an agent. The determination of whether we control the underlying service or right to the service prior to our transfer to the customer requires, at times, significant judgment.
•Our products are generally sold with a right of return, which is accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize. Device return levels are estimated based on the relative selling pricesexpected value method as there are a large number of contracts with similar characteristics and the outcome of each deliverablecontract is independent of the others. Historical return rate experience is a significant input to our expected value methodology.
•Sales of equipment to indirect dealers who have been identified as our customer (referred to as the sell-in model) often include credits subsequently paid to the dealer as a reimbursement for any discount promotions offered to the end consumer. These credits (payments to a customer, the dealer) are accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize from the sales of equipment to indirect dealers and are estimated based on historical experience and other factors, such as expected promotional activity.
•The determination of the standalone selling price for contracts that involve more than one performance obligation may require significant judgment, such as when the selling price of a standalone basis.good or service is not readily observable.
Wireless Services Revenue
We generate our wireless serviceservices revenues from providing access to, and usage of, our wireless communications network. Service revenues also include revenues earned for providing value addedpremium services to customers, such as handsetdevice insurance services. Service revenuescontracts are billed monthly either in advance or arrears, or are prepaid and are recognized when theprepaid. Generally, service is rendered and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. Revenues that are not reasonably assured to be collectible are recorded on a cash basis as payments are received. The recognition of prepaid revenue is deferred untilrecognized as we
satisfy our performance obligation to transfer service to our customers. We typically satisfy our stand-ready performance obligations, including unlimited wireless services, evenly over the contract term. For usage-based and prepaid wireless services, we satisfy our performance obligations when services are rendered or the customer’s rightsrendered.
Consideration payable to service expire unused. Generally, incentives given to customers are recordeda customer is treated as a reduction of the total transaction price, unless the payment is in exchange for a distinct good or service, such as certain commissions paid to revenue. We recognize service revenues for Data Stash plans when such services are delivered anddealers, in which case the datapayment is consumed,treated as a purchase of that distinct good or at time of forfeiture or expiration. Revenues relating to unused data that is carried over to the following month are deferred and valued based on their relative standalone selling price. Revenue is recorded gross for arrangements involving the resale of third-party services where we are considered the primary obligor and is recorded net of associated costs incurred for services whereby we are not considered the primary obligor.service.
Federal Universal Service Fund (“USF”) and other fees are assessed by various governmental authorities in connection with the services we provide to our customers.customers and are included in Cost of services. When we separately bill and collect these regulatory fees from customers, they are recorded gross in Total service revenues and cost of services in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, we recorded approximately $258$267 million, $409$93 million and $334$161 million, respectively, of USF fees on a gross basis.
We have made an accounting policy election to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by us from a customer (e.g., sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes).
Wireline Revenue
Performance obligations related to our Wireline customers include the provision of domestic and international data communications services, generally to complement business wireless customers. Wireline revenues are included within Roaming and other service revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Equipment Revenues
We generate equipment revenues from the sale or lease of mobile communication devices and accessories. Device and accessory sales revenues are generally recognizedFor performance obligations related to equipment contracts, we typically transfer control at a point in time when the products aredevice or accessory is delivered to, and accepted by, the customer or dealer. We defer a portionhave elected to account for shipping and handling activities that occur after control of equipment revenues and costthe related good transfers as fulfillment activities instead of equipment sales for expectedassessing such activities as performance obligations. We estimate variable consideration (e.g., device returns or certain payments to indirect dealers) primarily based on historical experience. Equipment sales not probable of collection are generally recorded as payments are received. Our assessment of collectibility considers contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk.
We offer certain customers the option to pay for devices and accessories in installments using an EIP. Equipment salesGenerally, we recognize as a reduction of the total transaction price the effects of a financing component in contracts where customers purchase their devices and accessories on an EIP with a term of more than one year, including those financing components that are not reasonably assuredconsidered to be collectible are recorded onsignificant to the contract. However, we have elected the practical expedient to not recognize the effects of a cash basis as payments are received.significant financing component for contracts where we expect, at contract inception, that the period between the transfer of a performance obligation to a customer and the customer’s payment for that performance obligation will be one year or less.
In addition, for customers enrolledwho enroll in our JUMP!, program, we separaterecognize a liability based on the JUMP! trade-in right from the multiple element arrangement at its fair value and defer the portion of revenue which represents theestimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right.right guarantee. The fair value of the guarantee is deducted from the transaction price and the remaining transaction price is allocated to other elements of the contract, including service and equipment performance obligations. See Guarantee Liabilities section“Guarantee Liabilities” above for further information.
We introduced JUMP! On Demand which allows customers to lease a device over a period of up to 18 months and upgrade their leased wireless deviceit for a new device up to one time per month. LeasedTo date, substantially all of our leased wireless devices are accounted for as operating leases and estimated contract consideration is allocated between lease and non-lease elements (such as service and equipment performance obligations) based on the relative standalone selling price of each performance obligation in the contract. Lease revenues are recorded as equipment revenues and recognized as earned on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The residual valueLease revenues on contracts not probable of purchased leased devices is recorded as equipment revenuescollection are limited to the amount of payments received. See “Property and cost of equipment sales. See Property and Equipment sectionEquipment” above for further information.
Rent ExpenseAdvertising and Search Revenues
Effective April 1, 2020, certain of our advertising and search revenues are now presented within Roaming and other service revenues, resulting in a reclassification of $506 million and $449 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively. These revenues were previously presented within Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
Imputed Interest on EIP Receivables
We record the effects of financing on all EIP loans regardless of whether or not the financing is considered to be significant. The imputation of interest results in a discount of the EIP receivable, thereby adjusting the transaction price of the contract with the customer, which is then allocated to the performance obligations of the arrangement.
For transactions where we recognize a significant financing component, judgment is required to determine the discount rate. For EIP sales, the discount rate used to adjust the transaction price primarily reflects current market interest rates and the estimated credit risk of the customer. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses” above, for additional discussion on how we assess credit risk.
For indirect channel loans to the end service customer in which the sale of the device was to the dealer (sell-in basis), the effect of imputing interest is recognized as a reduction to service revenue, the only performance obligation with the service customer as the device sale was recognized when transferred to the dealer, over the service contract period.
Our policies for imputed interest on EIP receivables are applied to loans originated for Sprint and Boost (up to the sale of the Prepaid Business to DISH on July 1, 2020) customers subsequent to Merger close.
Contract Balances
Generally, our devices and service plans are available at standard prices, which are maintained on price lists and published on our website and/or within our retail stores.
For contracts that involve more than one product or service that are identified as separate performance obligations, the transaction price is allocated to the performance obligations based on their relative standalone selling prices. The standalone selling price is the price at which we would sell the good or service separately to a customer and is most commonly evidenced by the price at which we sell that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers.
A contract asset is recorded when revenue is recognized in advance of our right to receive consideration (i.e., we must perform additional services in order to receive consideration). Amounts are recorded as receivables when our right to consideration is unconditional. When consideration is received, or we have an unconditional right to consideration in advance of delivery of goods or services, a contract liability is recorded. The transaction price can include non-refundable upfront fees, which are allocated to the identifiable performance obligations.
Contract assets are included in Other current assets and Other assets and contract liabilities are included in Deferred revenue in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Contract Modifications
Our service contracts allow customers to frequently modify their contracts without incurring penalties, in many cases. Each time a contract is modified, we evaluate the change in scope or price of the contract to determine if the modification should be treated as a separate contract, as if there is a termination of the existing contract and creation of a new contract, or if the modification should be considered a change associated with the existing contract. We typically do not have significant impacts from contract modifications.
Contract Costs
We incur certain incremental costs to obtain a contract that we expect to recover, such as sales commissions. We record an asset when these incremental costs to obtain a contract are incurred and amortize them on a systematic basis that is consistent with the transfer to the customer of the goods or services to which the asset relates.
We capitalize postpaid sales commissions for service activation as costs to acquire a contract and amortize them over the estimated period of benefit, currently 24 months. For capitalized contract costs, determining the amortization period over which such costs are recognized as well as assessing the indicators of impairment may require significant judgment. Prepaid commissions are expensed as incurred as their estimated period of benefit does not extend beyond 12 months. Commissions
paid upon device upgrade are not capitalized if the remaining customer contract is less than one year. Commissions paid when the customer has a lease are treated as initial direct costs and recognized over the lease term.
Our policies for the capitalization and amortization of costs to acquire a contract are applied to the Sprint, Boost (up to the sale of the Prepaid Business to Dish on July 1, 2020) and Assurance Wireless brands subsequent to the Merger close.
Incremental costs to obtain equipment contracts (e.g., commissions paid on device and accessory sales) are recognized when the equipment is transferred to the customer.
Brightstar Distribution
We had arrangements with Brightstar US, Inc. (“Brightstar”), a subsidiary of SoftBank, whereby Brightstar provided supply chain and inventory management services to us in our indirect channels. T-Mobile sold devices through Brightstar to T-Mobile indirect channels who then sold the device to an end customer.
The supply chain and inventory management arrangement included, among other things, that Brightstar may purchase inventory from the original equipment manufacturers to sell through to our indirect channels. As compensation for these services, we remitted per unit fees to Brightstar for each device sold to these indirect dealers.
Devices sold from T-Mobile to Brightstar do not meet the criteria for a sale. Devices transferred from T-Mobile to Brightstar remain in inventory until control is transferred upon the sale of the device to the end customer, and in some circumstances to the indirect dealer.
For customers who choose to lease a device previously sold to the indirect dealer, T-Mobile will repurchase the device from the indirect dealer and originate a lease directly with the end customer. Repurchase activity from the indirect dealer is estimated and treated as a right of return, reducing equipment revenue at the time of sale to the indirect dealer. Upon lease to the end customer, T-Mobile recognizes lease revenue over the associated lease term within Equipment revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
By December 31, 2020, we had terminated or restructured most of our arrangements with Brightstar, except for reverse logistics and trade-in services.
Leases (effective January 1, 2019)
Cell Site, Retail Store and Office Facility Leases
We are a lessee for non-cancelable operating and financing leases for cell sites, switch sites, retail locations, corporate officesstores, network equipment and dedicated transportation lines, someoffice facilities with contractual terms that generally extend through 2035. Additionally, we lease dark fiber through non-cancelable operating leases with contractual terms that generally extend through 2041. The majority of whichcell site leases have a non-cancelable term of five to 15 years with several renewal options that can extend the lease term from five to 35 years. Some of these leases have escalating rentals during the initial lease term and during subsequent optional renewal periods. We recognize renta right-of-use asset and lease liability for operating leases based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. The right-of-use asset for an operating lease is based on the lease liability. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable lease term and renewal periods that are considered reasonably assuredcertain.
In addition, we have financing leases for certain network equipment that generally have a non-cancelable lease term of two to five years. The financing leases do not have renewal options and contain a bargain purchase option at the inceptionend of the lease. We recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for financing leases based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. The right-of-use asset for a finance lease is based on the lease liability. Lease expense for our financing leases is comprised of the amortization of the right-of-use asset and interest expense recognized based on the effective interest method.
We consider several factors in assessing whether renewal periods are reasonably assuredcertain of being exercised, including the continued maturation of our nationwide network, nationwide, technological advances within the telecommunications industry and the availability of alternative sites. We have concluded it is not reasonably certain that we would exercise the options to extend or terminate our leases. Therefore, as of the lease commencement date, our lease terms generally do not include these options. We include options to extend or terminate a lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option.
In determining the discount rate used to measure the right-of-use asset and lease liability, we use rates implicit in the lease, or if not readily available, we use our incremental borrowing rate. Our incremental borrowing rate is based on an estimated secured
rate comprised of a risk-free LIBOR rate plus a credit spread as secured by our assets. Determining a credit spread as secured by our assets may require significant judgment.
Certain of our lease agreements include rental payments based on changes in the consumer price index (“CPI”). Lease liabilities are not remeasured as a result of changes in the CPI; instead, changes in the CPI are treated as variable lease payments and are excluded from the measurement of the right-of-use asset and lease liability. These payments are recognized in the period in which the related obligation is incurred. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
Generally, we elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components in arrangements where we are the lessee. For arrangements in which we are the lessor of wireless devices, we did not elect this practical expedient. We did not elect the short-term lease recognition exemption; as such, leases with terms shorter than 12-months are included as a right-of-use asset and lease liability.
Rental revenues and expenses associated with co-location tower sites are presented on a net basis under Topic 842. These revenues and expenses were presented on a gross basis under Topic 840. See Note 17 - Leases for further information.
See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, for additional discussion regarding the accounting policies that governed leases prior to January 1, 2019.
Cell Tower Monetization Transactions
In 2012, we entered into a prepaid master lease in which we as the lessor provided the rights to utilize tower sites and we leased back space on certain of those towers.Prior to the Merger, Sprint entered into a similar lease-out and leaseback arrangement which we assumed in the Merger.
These arrangements are treated as failed sale leasebacks in which the proceeds received are reported as a financing obligation. The principal payments on the tower obligations are included in Other, net within Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.Our historical tower site asset costs are reported in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are depreciated. See Note 9 - Tower Obligations for further information.
Sprint Retirement Pension Plan
Through the Merger, we acquired the assets and assumed the liabilities associated with the Sprint Retirement Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”), which is a defined benefit pension plan providing postretirement benefits to certain employees. As of December 31, 2005, the Pension Plan was amended to freeze benefit plan accruals for participants.
The investments in the Pension Plan are measured at fair value on a recurring basis each quarter using quoted market prices or the net asset value per share as a practical expedient. The projected benefit obligations associated with the Pension Plan are determined based on actuarial models utilizing mortality tables and discount rates applied to the expected benefit term. See Note 11 - Employee Compensation and Benefit Plans for further information on the Pension Plan.
Advertising Expense
We expense the cost of advertising and other promotional expenditures to market our services and products as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, advertising expenses included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income were $1.8 billion, $1.7$1.6 billion and $1.6$1.7 billion, respectively.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences are realized. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions within the carryforward periods available.
We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We
assess whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position and adjust the unrecognized tax benefits in light of changes in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law.
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of adjustments, net of tax, related to unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, available-for-sale securities.securities, foreign currency translation and pension and other postretirement benefits. This is reported in Accumulated other comprehensive incomeloss as a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized in earnings.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation cost for stock awards, which include restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”), is measured at fair value on the grant date and recognized as expense, net of expected forfeitures, over the related service period. The fair value of stock awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. RSUs are recognized as expense using the straight-line method. PRSUs are recognized as expense following a graded vesting schedule.schedule with their performance re-assessed and updated on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as changes in facts and circumstances warrant.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing Net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of outstanding stock options, RSUs and PRSUs, calculated using the treasury stock method, and prior to the conversion of our preferred stock, potentially dilutive common shares included mandatory convertible preferred stock calculated using the if-converted method. See Note 1216 - Earnings Per Share for further information.
Our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program during the fourth quarter of 2017. Repurchased shares are retired and reduce the number of shares issued and outstanding. See Note 10 - Repurchases of Common Stock for further information.
Variable Interest Entities
VIEs are entities whichthat lack sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, have equity investors whichthat do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating to the entity's operations through voting rights, do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses or do not have the right to receive the residual returns of the entity. The most common type of VIE is a special purpose entity (“SPE”). SPEs are commonly used in securitization transactions in order to isolate certain assets and distribute the cash flows from those assets to investors. SPEs are generally structured to insulate investors from claims on the SPE'sSPEs’ assets by creditors of other entities, including the creditors of the seller of the assets.assets, these SPEs are commonly referred to as being bankruptcy remote.
The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is the party which has both the power to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, and through its interests in the VIE, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE which could potentially be significant to the VIE. We consolidate VIEs when we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary or when the VIE cannot be deconsolidated. See Note 4 - Sales of Certain Receivables and Note 9 - Tower Obligations for further information.
In assessing which party is the primary beneficiary, all the facts and circumstances are considered, including each party’s role in establishing the VIE and its ongoing rights and responsibilities. This assessment includes, first, identifying the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and second, identifying which party, if any, has power over those activities. In general, the parties that make the most significant decisions affecting the VIE (such as asset managers and servicers) or have the right to unilaterally remove those decision-makers are deemed to have the power to direct the activities of a VIE.
Change in Accounting PrincipleDevice Purchases Cash Flow Presentation
Effective January 1, 2017, the imputed discount on EIP receivables, whichWe classify all device purchases, whether acquired for sale or lease, as operating cash outflows as our predominant strategy is amortized over the financed installment term using the effective interest method,to sell devices to customers rather than lease them. SeeNote 20 – Additional Financial Information for disclosures ofLeased devices transferred from inventory to property and was previously presented within Interest income in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, is now presented within Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. We believe this presentation is preferable because it provides a better representation of amounts earnedequipment and Returned leased devices transferred from our major ongoing operationsproperty and aligns with industry practice thereby enhancing comparability. We have applied this change retrospectively and presented the effect on the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, in the tables below:equipment to inventory.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
| (in millions) | Unadjusted | | Change in Accounting Principle | | As Adjusted |
| Other revenues | $ | 789 |
| | $ | 280 |
| | $ | 1,069 |
|
| Total revenues | 40,324 |
| | 280 |
| | 40,604 |
|
| Operating income | 4,608 |
| | 280 |
| | 4,888 |
|
| Interest income | 297 |
| | (280 | ) | | 17 |
|
| Total other expense, net | (1,447 | ) | | (280 | ) | | (1,727 | ) |
| Net income | 4,536 |
| | — |
| | 4,536 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
| (in millions) | As Filed | | Change in Accounting Principle | | As Adjusted |
| Other revenues | $ | 671 |
| | $ | 248 |
| | $ | 919 |
|
| Total revenues | 37,242 |
| | 248 |
| | 37,490 |
|
| Operating income | 3,802 |
| | 248 |
| | 4,050 |
|
| Interest income | 261 |
| | (248 | ) | | 13 |
|
| Total other expense, net | (1,475 | ) | | (248 | ) | | (1,723 | ) |
| Net income | 1,460 |
| | — |
| | 1,460 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2015 |
| (in millions) | As Filed | | Change in Accounting Principle | | As Adjusted |
| Other revenues | $ | 514 |
| | $ | 414 |
| | $ | 928 |
|
| Total revenues | 32,053 |
| | 414 |
| | 32,467 |
|
| Operating income | 2,065 |
| | 414 |
| | 2,479 |
|
| Interest income | 420 |
| | (414 | ) | | 6 |
|
| Total other expense, net | (1,087 | ) | | (414 | ) | | (1,501 | ) |
| Net income | 733 |
| | — |
| | 733 |
|
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Current Year
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles - GoodwillReceivables and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The amendments in this update eliminate the requirement to perform step two of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation consistent with the principles in determining fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, when an impairment is determined to have occurred. Instead, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited by the amount of goodwill in that reporting unit. We adopted this new guidance in the fourth quarter of 2017. The implementation of this standard did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.Expected Credit Losses
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”), and has since modified the standard with several ASUs. The standard is effective for us, and we adopted the standard, on January 1, 2018.
The standard requires entities to recognize revenue through the application of a five-step model, which includes: identification of the contract; identification of the performance obligations; determination of the transaction price; allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations; and recognition of revenue as the entity satisfies the performance obligations.
The guidance permits two methods of adoption, the full retrospective method applying the standard to each prior reporting period presented, or the modified retrospective method with a cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. The standard also allows entities to apply certain practical expedients at their discretion. We will adopt the standard using the modified retrospective method with a cumulative catch up adjustment and will provide additional disclosures comparing results to previous GAAP in our 2018 consolidated financial statements. We plan to apply the new revenue standard only to contracts not completed as of the date of initial application, referred to as open contracts.
The most significant judgments and impacts upon adoption of the standard include the following items:
Upon adoption, we will defer (i.e. capitalize) incremental contract acquisition costs and recognize (i.e. amortize) them over the term of the initial contract and anticipated renewal contracts to which the costs relate. Deferred contract costs have an average amortization period of approximately 24 months, subject to being monitored every period to reflect any significant change in assumptions. In addition, the deferred contract cost asset is assessed for impairment on a
periodic basis. We are utilizing the practical expedient permitting expensing of costs to obtain a contract when the expected amortization period is one year or less which typically results in expensing commissions paid to acquire branded prepaid service contracts. As a result, incremental contract acquisition costs paid on open contracts of approximately $150 million are expected to be capitalized and subsequently amortized upon adoption on January 1, 2018 as a cumulative effect adjustment to equity, which consists primarily of commissions paid to acquire branded postpaid service contracts. Contract costs capitalized for new contracts will accumulate during 2018 as deferred assets. As a result, we expect there to be a net benefit to operating income during 2018. As capitalized costs amortize into expense over time the accretive benefit to operating income anticipated in 2018 is expected to moderate in 2019 and become insignificant in 2020 as the timing benefits of deferring these costs dissipate.
Under the new standard, certain commissions paid to dealers previously recognized as a reduction to revenues will be recorded as commission costs in Selling, general and administrative expense. During 2017 such commission costs were approximately $425 million.
Promotional bill credits offered to customers on equipment sales that are paid over time and are contingent on the customer maintaining a service contract results in an extended service contract term with multiple performance obligations, which impacts the allocation and timing of revenue recognition between service revenue and equipment revenue. A contract asset will be recorded when control of the equipment transfers to the customer, and subsequently recognized as a reduction to service revenue over the extended contract term. Contract assets of approximately $140 million are expected to be capitalized upon adoption on January 1, 2018 as a cumulative effect adjustment.
We are recognizing the financing component in our EIP contracts, including those financing components that are not considered to be significant to the contract. This application is consistent with our current practice of imputing interest.
We have implemented significant new revenue accounting systems, processes and internal controls over revenue recognition to assist us in the application of the new standard.
The cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard on January 1, 2018 is estimated to be a decrease to Accumulated deficit of approximately $220 million.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” The standard requires all lessees to report a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for most leases. The income statement recognition is similar to existing lease accounting and is based on lease classification. The standard requires lessees and lessors to classify most leases using principles similar to existing lease accounting. For lessors, the standard modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. We are currently evaluating the standard, which will require recognizing and measuring leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. Our evaluation includes assessing which of our arrangements qualify as a lease, and aggregating lease data and related information as well as determining whether previous conclusions for certain transactions, such as failed sale leaseback arrangements under Topic 840, would change under Topic 842. We plan to adopt the standard when it becomes effective for us beginning January 1, 2019, and expect the adoption of the standard will result in the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities that have not previously been recorded, which will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
We are in the process of implementing significant new lease accounting systems, processes and internal controls over lease recognition which will ultimately assist in the application of the new standard.
In June 2016, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASUAccounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.Instruments,” and has since modified the standard with several ASUs (collectively, the “new credit loss standard”). The new credit loss standard requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectibility of the reported amount. The new credit loss standard will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2020, and will require a cumulative-effect adjustment to Accumulated deficit as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (that is, a modified-retrospective approach). Early adoption is permitted for us as of January 1, 2019. We are currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and the timing of adoption.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” The standard is intended to reduce current diversity in practice and provides guidance on how certain cash receipts and payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The standard isbecame effective for us, and we adopted the standard, on January 1, 2018.2020. The new credit loss standard will requirerequired a retrospective approach. The standard will impactcumulative-effect adjustment to Accumulated deficit at the presentationdate of cash flows related to beneficial interestsinitial application, and as a result, we did not restate prior periods presented in securitization transactions, which is the deferred purchase price,
resulting in a reclassification of cash inflows from Operating activities to Investing activities of approximately $4.3 billion and $3.5 billion for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The standard will also impact the presentation of cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, resulting in a reclassification of cash outflows from Operating activities to Financing activities of $188 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, in our consolidated financial statements.
Under the new credit loss standard, we recognize lifetime expected credit losses at the inception of our credit risk exposures, whereas we previously recognized credit losses only when it was probable that they had been incurred. We also recognize expected credit losses on our EIP receivables, which are inclusive of all installment receivables acquired in the Merger or issued thereafter, separately from, and in addition to, any unamortized discount on those receivables. Prior to the adoption of the new credit loss standard, we had offset our estimate of probable losses on our EIP receivables by the amount of the related unamortized discounts on those receivables. We have developed an expected credit loss model incorporating forward-looking loss indicators. The cumulative effect of initially applying the new credit loss standard on our receivables portfolio on January 1, 2020 was an increase to our allowance for credit losses of $91 million, a decrease to our net deferred tax liabilities of $24 million and an increase to our Accumulated deficit of $67 million.
For EIP receivables acquired in the Merger, we also recognize expected credit losses separately from, and in addition to, the acquisition date fair value of the acquired EIP receivables.
Cloud Computing Arrangements
In October 2016,August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Accounting2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Topic 350): Customer’s Accounting for Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract.” The standard requiresaligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the income tax impact of intra-entity sales and transfers of property, exceptrequirements for inventory, be recognized when the transfer occurs.capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The standard will becomealso requires the presentation of the amortization of the capitalized implementation costs in the same line item in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income as the fees associated with the hosting arrangement. The standard became effective for us, beginningand we adopted the standard, on January 1, 2018,2020. We adopted the standard on a prospective basis applying it to implementation costs incurred subsequent to January 1, 2020 and, will require any deferred taxesas a result, did not yet recognized on intra-entity transfers to be recorded to retained earnings under a modified retrospective approach.restate the prior periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. The implementationadoption of thisthe standard isdid not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Income Taxes
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.” The standard removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. We early adopted the standard on January 1, 2020 and have applied the standard retrospectively to all periods presented. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Guarantor Financial Information
On March 2, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted amendments to the financial disclosure requirements for guarantors and issuers of guaranteed securities, as well as for affiliates whose securities collateralize a registrant’s securities. The amendments revise Rules 3-10 and 3-16 of Regulation S-X, and relocate part of Rule 3-10 and all of Rule 3-16 to the new Article 13 in Regulation S-X, which is comprised of new Rules 13-01 and 13-02. We early adopted the requirements of the amendments on January 1, 2020, which included replacing guarantor condensed consolidating financial information with summarized financial information for the consolidated obligor group (Parent, Issuer, and Guarantor Subsidiaries) and no longer requiring guarantor cash flow information, financial information for non-guarantor subsidiaries, or a reconciliation to the consolidated results.
Regulation S-K Modernization Amendments
On August 26, 2020, the SEC adopted amendments to modernize the description of business (Item 101), legal proceedings (Item 103), and risk factor disclosures (Item 105) that registrants are required to make pursuant to Regulation S-K. The amendments are intended to elicit improved disclosures for investors and add efficiencies to the compliance efforts of registrants. The amendments are also intended to improve the readability of disclosure documents, as well as discourage repetition and reduce the disclosure of unnecessary information. The amendments became effective for us, and we adopted the amendments on November 9, 2020, which included making certain updates to our description of business and risk factor disclosures within our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Reference Rate Reform
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” The standard provides temporary optional expedients and allows for certain exceptions to applying existing GAAP for contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued as a result of reference rate reform. The standard is available for adoption for a limited time through December 31, 2022. We are currently evaluating the impact this standard will have, including optional expedients, on our consolidated financial statements.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Selected Financial Data and Supplementary Information Amendments
On January 11, 2021, the SEC adopted amendments to eliminate the requirement for Selected Financial Data, streamline the requirement to disclose Supplementary Financial Information and amend Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”). These amendments are intended to eliminate duplicative disclosures and modernize and enhance MD&A for the benefit of investors, while simplifying compliance efforts for registrants. The amendments became effective on February 10, 2021. We are currently evaluating the impact these amendments will have on our consolidated financial statements. We will apply the amendments, as applicable, to relevant filings made with the SEC subsequent to this Form 10-K.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the SEC did not have, or are not expected to have, a significant impact on our present or future consolidated financial statements.
Note 2 – Business Combination
Business Combination Agreement and Amendments
On April 29, 2018, we entered into a Business Combination Agreement for the Merger. The Business Combination Agreement was subsequently amended to provide that, following the closing of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement (collectively, the “Transactions”), SoftBank Group Corp. (“SoftBank”) would indemnify us against certain specified matters and the loss of value arising out of, or resulting from, cessation of access to spectrum under certain circumstances and subject to certain limitations and qualifications.
On February 20, 2020, T-Mobile, SoftBank and Deutsche Telekom AG (“DT”) entered into a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”). Pursuant to the Letter Agreement, SoftBank agreed to cause its applicable affiliates to surrender to T-Mobile, for no additional consideration, an aggregate of 48,751,557 shares of T-Mobile common stock (such number of shares, the “SoftBank Specified Shares Amount”), effective immediately following the Effective Time (as defined in the Business Combination Agreement), making SoftBank’s exchange ratio 11.31 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock. This resulted in an effective exchange ratio of approximately 11.00 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock immediately following the closing of the Merger, an increase from the originally agreed 9.75 shares. Sprint stockholders other than SoftBank received the original fixed exchange ratio of 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock for each share of Sprint common stock, or the equivalent of approximately 9.75 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock.
The Letter Agreement requires T-Mobile to issue to SoftBank 48,751,557 shares of T-Mobile common stock, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Letter Agreement, for no additional consideration, if certain conditions are met. The
issuance of these shares is contingent on the trailing 45-day volume-weighted average price per share of T-Mobile common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market being equal to or greater than $150.00, at any time during the period commencing on April 1, 2022 and ending on December 31, 2025. If the threshold price is not met, then NaN of the SoftBank Specified Shares Amount will be issued.
Closing of Sprint Merger
On April 1, 2020, we completed the Merger, and as a result, Sprint and its subsidiaries became wholly owned consolidated subsidiaries of T-Mobile. Sprint was the fourth-largest telecommunications company in the U.S. offering a comprehensive range of wireless and wireline communication products and services. As a combined company, we expect to be able to rapidly launch a broad and deep nationwide 5G network, accelerate innovation, increase competition in the U.S. wireless, video and broadband industries and achieve significant synergies and cost reductions by eliminating redundancies within the combined network as well as other business processes and operations. We combined the Sprint and T-Mobile operations under the T-Mobile brand nationwide on August 2, 2020.
Upon completion of the Merger, each share of Sprint common stock was exchanged for 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock, or 9.75 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock. After adjustments, including the holdback of the SoftBank Specified Shares Amount and fractional shares, we issued 373,396,310 shares of T-Mobile common stock to Sprint stockholders. The fair value of the T-Mobile common stock provided in exchange for Sprint common stock was approximately $31.3 billion.
Additional components of consideration included the repayment of certain of Sprint’s debt, replacement equity awards attributable to pre-combination services, contingent consideration and a cash payment received for certain reimbursed Merger expenses.
Immediately following the closing of the Merger and the surrender of the SoftBank Specified Shares Amount, pursuant to the Letter Agreement described above, DT and SoftBank held, directly or indirectly, approximately 43.6% and 24.7%, respectively, of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock, with the remaining approximately 31.7% of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock held by other stockholders.
Consideration Transferred
The acquisition-date fair value of consideration transferred in the Merger totaled $40.8 billion, comprised of the following:
| | | | | |
| (in millions) | April 1, 2020 |
Fair value of T-Mobile common stock issued to Sprint stockholders (1) | $ | 31,328 | |
Fair value of T-Mobile replacement equity awards attributable to pre-combination service (2) | 323 | |
Repayment of Sprint’s debt (including accrued interest and prepayment penalties) (3) | 7,396 | |
| |
Value of contingent consideration (4) | 1,882 | |
Payment received from selling stockholder (5) | (102) | |
| Total consideration exchanged | $ | 40,827 | |
(1) Represents the fair value of T-Mobile common stock issued to Sprint stockholders pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, less shares surrendered by SoftBank pursuant to the Letter Agreement. The fair value is based on 373,396,310 shares of Sprint common stock issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2020, an exchange ratio of 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock per share of Sprint common stock, less 48,751,557 T-Mobile shares surrendered by SoftBank which are treated as contingent consideration, and the closing price per share of T-Mobile common stock on NASDAQ on March 31, 2020, of $83.90, as shares were transferred to Sprint stockholders prior to the opening of markets on April 1, 2020.
(2) Equity-based awards held by Sprint employees prior to the acquisition date have been replaced with T-Mobile equity-based awards. The portion of the equity-based awards that relates to services performed by the employee prior to the acquisition date is included within consideration transferred, and includes stock options, restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units.
(3) Represents the cash consideration paid concurrent with the close of the Merger to retire certain Sprint debt, as required by change in control provisions of the debt, plus interest and prepayment penalties.
(4) Represents the fair value of the SoftBank Specified Shares Amount contingent consideration that may be issued as set forth in the Letter Agreement.
(5) Represents receipt of a cash payment from SoftBank for certain expenses associated with the Merger and is presented in Cash paid for acquisition of companies, net of cash acquired within our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The SoftBank Specified Shares Amount was determined to be contingent consideration with an acquisition-date fair value of $1.9 billion. We estimated the fair value using the income approach, a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model, whereby a Monte Carlo simulation method estimated the probability of different outcomes as the likelihood of achieving the 45-day volume-weighted average price threshold is not easily predicted. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and, therefore, represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The key
assumptions in applying the income approach include estimated future share-price volatility, which was based on historical market trends and estimated future performance of T-Mobile.
The maximum amount of contingent consideration that could be issued to SoftBank has an estimated value of $7.3 billion, based on SoftBank Specified Shares Amount of 48,751,557 multiplied by the defined volume-weighted average price per share of $150.00. The contingent consideration that could be delivered to SoftBank is classified within equity and is not subject to remeasurement.
Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
We accounted for the Merger as a business combination. The identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Sprint were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date and consolidated with those of T-Mobile. Assigning fair market values to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of an acquisition requires the use of significant judgment regarding estimates and assumptions. For the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, we used the cost, income and market approaches, including market participant assumptions.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values for each major class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. We retained the services of certified valuation specialists to assist with assigning estimated values to certain acquired assets and assumed liabilities. As of December 31, 2020, the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is substantially complete except for the finalization of certain aspects of spectrum valuation, the valuation of certain income tax matters and loss contingencies.
| | | | | |
| (in millions) | April 1, 2020 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,084 | |
| Accounts receivable | 1,781 | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables | 1,088 | |
| Inventory | 658 | |
| Prepaid expenses | 140 | |
| Assets held for sale | 1,908 | |
| Other current assets | 631 | |
| Property and equipment | 18,435 | |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | 6,583 | |
| Financing lease right-of-use assets | 291 | |
| Goodwill | 9,401 | |
| Spectrum licenses | 45,400 | |
| Other intangible assets | 6,325 | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net | 247 | |
Other assets (1) | 540 | |
| Total assets acquired | 95,512 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 4,944 | |
| Short-term debt | 2,760 | |
| Deferred revenue | 508 | |
| Short-term operating lease liabilities | 1,818 | |
| Short-term financing lease liabilities | 8 | |
| Liabilities held for sale | 475 | |
| Other current liabilities | 671 | |
| Long-term debt | 29,037 | |
| Tower obligations | 950 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 3,513 | |
| Operating lease liabilities | 5,615 | |
| Financing lease liabilities | 12 | |
| |
| Other long-term liabilities | 4,374 | |
| Total liabilities assumed | 54,685 | |
| |
| Total consideration transferred | $ | 40,827 | |
(1) Included in Other assets acquired is $80 million in restricted cash.
Amounts previously disclosed for the estimated values of certain acquired assets and liabilities assumed have been revised based on additional information arising subsequent to the initial valuation.
Significant Measurement Period Adjustments
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized measurement period adjustments to reflect facts and circumstances in existence as of the date of the Merger. These adjustments included:
•An increase of $1.2 billion in Property and equipment related to the finalization of valuations related to certain tower assets and an increase of $1.7 billion in Other long-term liabilities associated with contract terms that are unfavorable to market terms. See Note 9 – Tower Obligations for further information; and •A decrease of $690 million in Deferred tax liabilities resulting from a $357 million reclassification from deferred tax liabilities to current liabilities and the continued assessment of valuation allowance necessary as of the date of the Merger along with tax effecting measurement period adjustments. See Note 13 - Income Taxes for further information.
The measurement period adjustments did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2020. The net impact of the measurement period adjustments resulted in a net increase to goodwill.
Intangible Assets and Liabilities
Goodwill with a provisionally assigned value of $9.4 billion represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The preliminary goodwill recognized includes synergies expected to be achieved from the operations of the combined company, the assembled workforce of Sprint and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition. Expected synergies include the cost savings from the planned integration of network infrastructure, facilities, personnel and systems. NaN of the goodwill resulting from the Merger is deductible for tax purposes. All of the goodwill acquired is allocated to the wireless reporting unit.
Other intangible assets include $4.9 billion of customer relationships with a weighted-average useful life of eight years and tradenames of $207 million with a useful life of two years. Leased spectrum arrangements that have favorable (asset) and unfavorable (liability) terms compared to current market rates were assigned preliminary fair values of $790 million and $197 million, respectively, with 18 year and 19 year weighted average useful lives, respectively.
The preliminary fair value of Spectrum licenses of $45.4 billion was estimated using the income approach, specifically a Greenfield model. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and, therefore, represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The key assumptions in applying the income approach include the discount rate, market share, estimated capital and operating expenditures, forecasted service revenue and long-term growth rate for a hypothetical market participant that enters the wireless industry and builds a nationwide wireless network.
Acquired Receivables
The fair value of the assets acquired include Accounts receivable of $1.8 billion and EIP receivables of $1.3 billion. The unpaid principal balance under these contracts as of the Merger date was $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively. The difference between the fair value and the unpaid principal balance primarily represents amounts expected to be uncollectible.
Indemnification Assets and Contingent Liabilities
Pursuant to Amendment No 2. to the Business Combination Agreement, SoftBank agreed to indemnify us against certain specified matters and losses. As of December 31, 2020, we have recorded a contingent liability and an offsetting indemnification asset for the expected reimbursement by SoftBank for certain Lifeline matters that have not been resolved. The liability is presented in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and the indemnification asset is presented in Other current assets within our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In November 2020, we entered into a consent decree with the FCC to resolve certain Lifeline matters, which resulted in a payment of $200 million by SoftBank. We expect that any additional liabilities related to these indemnified matters would be indemnified and reimbursed by SoftBank.
Transaction Costs
We recognized transaction costs of $201 million, $106 million and $71 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These costs were associated with legal and professional services and were recognized as Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited pro forma financial information gives effect to the Transactions as if they had been completed on January 1, 2019. The unaudited pro forma information was prepared in accordance with the requirements of ASC 805, which is a different basis than pro forma information prepared under Article 11 of Regulation S-X (“Article 11”). As such, they are not directly comparable with historical results for stand-alone T-Mobile prior to April 1, 2020, historical results for T-Mobile from April 1, 2020 that reflect the Transactions and are inclusive of the results and operations of Sprint, nor our previously provided pro forma financials prepared in accordance with Article 11. The pro forma results for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 include the impact of several adjustments to previously reported operating results. The pro forma adjustments are based on historically reported transactions by the respective companies. The pro forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the acquisition.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions, except per share amounts) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Total revenues | | | | | $ | 74,681 | | | $ | 70,607 | |
| Income from continuing operations | | | | | 3,302 | | | 185 | |
| Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | | | 677 | | | 1,594 | |
| Net income | | | | | 3,979 | | | 1,792 | |
Significant nonrecurring pro forma adjustments include:
•Transaction costs of $559 million are assumed to have occurred on January 1, 2019, and are recognized as if incurred in the first quarter of 2019;
•The Prepaid Business divested on July 1, 2020, is assumed to have been classified as discontinued operations as of January 1, 2019, and the related activities are presented in Income from discontinued operations, net of tax;
•Permanent financing issued and debt redemptions occurring in connection with the closing of the Merger are assumed to have occurred on January 1, 2019, and historical interest expense associated with repaid borrowings is removed;
•Tangible and intangible assets are assumed to be recorded at their estimated fair values as of the pro forma close date of January 1, 2019 and are depreciated or amortized over their estimated useful lives; and
The selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is provided for illustrative purposes only and does not purport to represent what the actual consolidated results of operations would have been had the Transactions actually occurred on January 1, 2019, nor do they purport to project the future consolidated results of operations.
For the periods subsequent to the Merger close date, the acquired Sprint subsidiaries contributed total revenues and operating income of $20.5 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020, that were included in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Financing
In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile USA”) entered into a commitment letter, dated as of April 29, 2018 (as amended and restated on May 15, 2018 and on September 6, 2019, the “Commitment Letter”). On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we drew down on our $19.0 billion New Secured Bridge Loan Facility and our $4.0 billion New Secured Term Loan Facility (each as defined below). We used the net proceeds from the drawdown of the secured facilities to refinance certain existing debt of us, Sprint and our and Sprint’s respective subsidiaries and for post-closing general corporate purposes of the combined company. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.
In connection with the financing provided for in the Commitment Letter, we incurred certain fees payable to the financial institutions. On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we paid $355 million in Commitment Letter fees to certain financial institutions. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.
In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, DT and T-Mobile USA entered into a Financing Matters Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2018 (the “Financing Matters Agreement”), pursuant to which DT agreed, among other things, to consent to, subject to certain conditions, amendments to certain existing debt owed to DT, in connection with the Merger. On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we made a payment for requisite consents to DT of $13 million. SeeNote 8 – Debtfor further information.
On May 18, 2018, under the terms and conditions described in the Consent Solicitation Statement dated as of May 14, 2018 (the “Consent Solicitation Statement”), we obtained consents necessary to effect amendments to certain existing debt of us and our subsidiaries. On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we made payments for requisite consents to third-party note holders of $95 million. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.
Regulatory Matters
The Transactions were the subject of various legal and regulatory proceedings involving a number of state and federal agencies. In connection with those proceedings and the approval of the Transactions, we have certain commitments and other obligations to various state and federal agencies and certain nongovernmental organizations. See Note 18 - Commitments and Contingencies for further information.
Prepaid Transaction
On July 26, 2019, we entered into the Asset Purchase Agreement with Sprint and DISH, pursuant to which, following the consummation of the Merger, DISH would acquire the Prepaid Business.
On June 17, 2020, T-Mobile, Sprint and DISH entered into the First Amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the First Amendment of the Asset Purchase Agreement, T-Mobile, Sprint and DISH agreed to proceed with the closing of the Prepaid Transaction in accordance with the Asset Purchase Agreement on July 1, 2020, subject to the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the terms and conditions of the Consent Decree.
On July 1, 2020, pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, we completed the Prepaid Transaction. Upon closing of the Prepaid Transaction, we received $1.4 billion from DISH for the Prepaid Business, subject to working capital adjustments. See Note 12 - Discontinued Operations for further information.
Shenandoah Personal Communications Company Affiliate Relationship
Sprint PCS (specifically Sprint Spectrum L.P.) is party to a variety of publicly filed agreements with Shenandoah Personal Communications Company LLC (“Shentel”), pursuant to which Shentel is the exclusive provider of Sprint PCS’s wireless mobility communications network products in certain parts of Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Pursuant to one such agreement, the Sprint PCS Management Agreement, dated November 5, 1999 (as amended, supplemented and modified from time to time, the “Management Agreement”), Sprint PCS was granted an option to purchase Shentel’s wireless telecommunications assets used to provide services pursuant to the Management Agreement. On August 26, 2020, Sprint, now our direct subsidiary, on behalf of and as the direct or indirect owner of Sprint PCS, exercised its option by delivering a binding notice of exercise to Shentel. The exercise of this option triggered a requirement for the parties to engage three independent valuation providers (the “Valuation Providers”) to calculate the “entire business value” (the “Entire Business Value”) of such wireless telecommunications assets, pursuant to a formula and valuation process prescribed in the Management Agreement.
Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on February 1, 2021, in accordance with the Management Agreement and other agreed-upon terms, the Valuation Providers determined and calculated the Entire Business Value of Shentel’s wireless telecommunication assets used to provide services pursuant to the Management Agreement to be $2.1 billion, and correspondingly, the base purchase price for such wireless telecommunication assets shall be ninety percent (90%) of that Entire Business Value amount ($1.9 billion), subject to certain other purchase price adjustments prescribed by the Management Agreement and such additional purchase price adjustments agreed by the parties. The parties are negotiating the remaining outstanding terms of a definitive agreement to govern the purchase of Shentel’s wireless telecommunication assets and expect the transaction to close in the second quarter of 2021 after satisfying customary conditions to closing.
Note 3 – Receivables and Allowance forExpected Credit Losses
Our portfolio of receivables is comprised of two2 portfolio segments,segments: accounts receivable and EIP receivables.
Accounts Receivable Portfolio Segment
Our accounts receivable segment primarily consists of amounts currently due from customers, including service and leased device receivables, other carriers anddevice insurance administrators, wholesale partners, third-party retail channels.channels and other carriers.
We estimate expected credit losses associated with our accounts receivable portfolio using an aging schedule methodology that utilizes historical information and current conditions to develop expected credit losses by aging bucket, including for receivables that are not past due.
To determine the appropriate credit loss percentages by aging bucket, we consider a number of factors, including our overall historical credit losses, net of recoveries and timely payment experience as well as current collection trends such as write-off frequency and severity, credit quality of the customer base, and other qualitative factors such as macro-economic conditions, including the expected economic impacts of the Pandemic.
We consider the need to adjust our estimate of expected credit losses for reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions. To do so, we monitor professional forecasts of changes in real U.S. gross domestic product and forecasts of consumer credit behavior for comparable credit exposures. We also periodically evaluate other economic indicators such as unemployment rates to assess their level of correlation with our historical credit loss statistics.
EIP Receivables Portfolio Segment
Based upon customer credit profiles at the time of customer origination, we classify the EIP receivablereceivables segment into two2 customer classes of “Prime” and “Subprime.” Prime customer receivables are those with lower delinquencycredit risk and Subprime customer receivables are those with higher delinquencycredit risk. Subprime customersCustomers may be required to make a down payment on their equipment purchases. In addition, certain customers within the Subprime category are required to pay an advance deposit.
To determine a customer’s credit profile, we use a proprietary credit scoring model that measures the credit quality of a customer at the time of application for wireless communications service using several factors, such as credit bureau information, consumer credit risk scores and service and device plan characteristics.
Installment loans acquired in the Merger are included in EIP receivables. We applied our proprietary credit scoring model to the customers acquired in the Merger with an outstanding EIP receivable balance. Based on tenure, consumer credit risk score and credit profile, these acquired customers were classified into our customer classes of Prime or Subprime. Our proprietary credit scoring model is applied to all EIP arrangements originated after the Merger close date.
The following table summarizes the EIP receivables, including imputed discounts and related allowance for credit losses:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| | | |
| | | |
EIP receivables, gross (1) | $ | 6,213 | | | $ | 4,582 | |
| Unamortized imputed discount | (325) | | | (299) | |
| | | |
| EIP receivables, net of unamortized imputed discount | 5,888 | | | 4,283 | |
Allowance for credit losses (2) | (280) | | | (100) | |
| | | |
| EIP receivables, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount | $ | 5,608 | | | $ | 4,183 | |
| Classified on the balance sheet as: | | | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount | $ | 3,577 | | | $ | 2,600 | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount | 2,031 | | | 1,583 | |
| | | |
| EIP receivables, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount | $ | 5,608 | | | $ | 4,183 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| EIP receivables, gross | $ | 3,960 |
| | $ | 3,230 |
|
| Unamortized imputed discount | (264 | ) | | (195 | ) |
| EIP receivables, net of unamortized imputed discount | 3,696 |
| | 3,035 |
|
| Allowance for credit losses | (132 | ) | | (121 | ) |
| EIP receivables, net | $ | 3,564 |
| | $ | 2,914 |
|
| | | | |
| Classified on the balance sheet as: | | | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables, net | $ | 2,290 |
| | $ | 1,930 |
|
| Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net | 1,274 |
| | 984 |
|
| EIP receivables, net | $ | 3,564 |
| | $ | 2,914 |
|
To determine(2) Allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2020 was impacted by the appropriate levelcumulative effect of initially applying the new credit loss standard on our receivables portfolio on January 1, 2020, which resulted in an increase to our allowance for credit losses of $91 million.
We manage our EIP receivables portfolio using delinquency and customer credit class as key credit quality indicators. As a part of the adoption of the new credit loss standard, we now disclose our EIP receivables portfolio disaggregated by origination year. EIP receivables acquired through the Merger are also presented by origination year. The following table presents the
amortized cost of our EIP receivables by delinquency status, customer credit class, and year of origination as of December 31, 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Originated in 2020 | | Originated in 2019 | | Originated prior to 2019 | | Total EIP Receivables, net of
unamortized imputed discounts |
| (in millions) | Prime | | Subprime | | Prime | | Subprime | | Prime | | Subprime | | Prime | | Subprime | | Grand total |
| Current - 30 days past due | $ | 2,654 | | | $ | 2,035 | | | $ | 528 | | | $ | 407 | | | $ | 124 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 3,306 | | | $ | 2,468 | | | $ | 5,774 | |
| 31 - 60 days past due | 16 | | | 30 | | | 6 | | | 12 | | | 1 | | | 0 | | | 23 | | | 42 | | | 65 | |
| 61 - 90 days past due | 4 | | | 13 | | | 2 | | | 5 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 6 | | | 18 | | | 24 | |
| More than 90 days past due | 3 | | | 11 | | | 2 | | | 6 | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 6 | | | 19 | | | 25 | |
| EIP receivables, net of unamortized imputed discount | $ | 2,677 | | | $ | 2,089 | | | $ | 538 | | | $ | 430 | | | $ | 126 | | | $ | 28 | | | $ | 3,341 | | | $ | 2,547 | | | $ | 5,888 | |
We estimate expected credit losses on our EIP receivables by using historical data adjusted for current conditions to calculate default probabilities for our outstanding EIP loans. We consider various risk characteristics when calculating default probabilities, such as how long such loans have been outstanding, customer credit ratings, customer tenure, delinquency status and other correlated variables identified through statistical analyses. We multiply these estimated default probabilities by our estimated loss given default, which considers recoveries.
As we do for our accounts receivable portfolio segment, we consider a numberthe need to adjust our estimate of credit quality indicators,expected losses on EIP receivables for reasonable and supportable forecasts of economic conditions through monitoring of external professional forecasts and periodic internal statistical analyses, including historical credit losses and timely payment experience as well as current collection trends such as write-off frequency and severity, agingthe expected economic impacts of the receivable portfolio, credit quality of the customer base and other qualitative factors such as macro-economic conditions.Pandemic.
We write off account balances if collection efforts are unsuccessful and the receivable balance is deemed uncollectible, based on customer credit quality and the aging of the receivable.
For EIP receivables subsequent toacquired in the initial determinationMerger, the difference between the fair value and unpaid principal balance of the imputed discount, we assessloan at the need for and, if necessary, recognize an allowance for credit losses
acquisition date is accreted to interest income over the extentcontractual life of the amount of estimated probable losses onloan using the gross EIP receivable balances exceed the remaining unamortized imputed discount balances.
Theeffective interest method. EIP receivables had a combined weighted average effective imputed interest ratesrate of 9.6%6.7% and 9.0%8.8% as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
Activity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016,2020, 2019 and 2015,2018 in the allowance for credit losses and unamortized imputed discount balances for the accounts receivable and EIP receivablereceivables segments were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| (in millions) | Accounts Receivable Allowance | | EIP Receivables Allowance | | Total | Accounts Receivable Allowance | | EIP Receivables Allowance | | Total | | Accounts Receivable Allowance | | EIP Receivables Allowance | | Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, beginning of period | $ | 61 | | | $ | 399 | | | $ | 460 | | | $ | 67 | | | $ | 449 | | | $ | 516 | | | $ | 86 | | | $ | 396 | | | $ | 482 | |
| Beginning balance adjustment due to implementation of the new credit loss standard | 0 | | | 91 | | | 91 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bad debt expense | 338 | | | 264 | | | 602 | | | 77 | | | 230 | | | 307 | | | 69 | | | 228 | | | 297 | |
| Write-offs, net of recoveries | (205) | | | (175) | | | (380) | | | (83) | | | (249) | | | (332) | | | (88) | | | (240) | | | (328) | |
| Change in imputed discount on short-term and long-term EIP receivables | N/A | | 171 | | | 171 | | | N/A | | 136 | | | 136 | | | N/A | | 250 | | | 250 | |
| Impact on the imputed discount from sales of EIP receivables | N/A | | (145) | | | (145) | | | N/A | | (167) | | | (167) | | | N/A | | (185) | | | (185) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, end of period | $ | 194 | | | $ | 605 | | | $ | 799 | | | $ | 61 | | | $ | 399 | | | $ | 460 | | | $ | 67 | | | $ | 449 | | | $ | 516 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures
We do not have material, unmitigated off-balance-sheet credit exposures as of December 31, 2020. In connection with the sales of certain service and EIP accounts receivable pursuant to the sale arrangements, we have deferred purchase price assets
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
| (in millions) | Accounts Receivable Allowance | | EIP Receivables Allowance | | Total | | Accounts Receivable Allowance | | EIP Receivables Allowance | | Total | | Accounts Receivable Allowance | | EIP Receivables Allowance | | Total |
| Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, beginning of period | $ | 102 |
| | $ | 316 |
| | $ | 418 |
| | $ | 116 |
| | $ | 333 |
| | $ | 449 |
| | $ | 83 |
| | $ | 448 |
| | $ | 531 |
|
| Bad debt expense | 104 |
| | 284 |
| | 388 |
| | 227 |
| | 250 |
| | 477 |
| | 182 |
| | 365 |
| | 547 |
|
| Write-offs, net of recoveries | (120 | ) | | (273 | ) | | (393 | ) | | (241 | ) | | (277 | ) | | (518 | ) | | (149 | ) | | (333 | ) | | (482 | ) |
| Change in imputed discount on short-term and long-term EIP receivables | N/A |
| | 252 |
| | 252 |
| | N/A |
| | 186 |
| | 186 |
| | N/A |
| | (84 | ) | | (84 | ) |
| Impact on the imputed discount from sales of EIP receivables | N/A |
| | (183 | ) | | (183 | ) | | N/A |
| | (176 | ) | | (176 | ) | | N/A |
| | (63 | ) | | (63 | ) |
| Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, end of period | $ | 86 |
| | $ | 396 |
| | $ | 482 |
| | $ | 102 |
| | $ | 316 |
| | $ | 418 |
| | $ | 116 |
| | $ | 333 |
| | $ | 449 |
|
Management considers the aging of receivables to be an important credit indicator. The following table provides delinquency status for the EIP portfolio segmentincluded in our Consolidated Balance Sheets measured at fair value that are based on a gross basis, which we actively monitor as part of our currentdiscounted cash flow model using unobservable Level 3 inputs, including customer default rates and credit risk management practicesworthiness, dilutions and policies:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| (in millions) | Prime | | Subprime | | Total EIP Receivables, gross | | Prime | | Subprime | | Total EIP Receivables, gross |
| Current - 30 days past due | $ | 1,727 |
| | $ | 2,133 |
| | $ | 3,860 |
| | $ | 1,375 |
| | $ | 1,735 |
| | $ | 3,110 |
|
| 31 - 60 days past due | 17 |
| | 29 |
| | 46 |
| | 27 |
| | 38 |
| | 65 |
|
| 61 - 90 days past due | 6 |
| | 16 |
| | 22 |
| | 7 |
| | 16 |
| | 23 |
|
| More than 90 days past due | 8 |
| | 24 |
| | 32 |
| | 10 |
| | 22 |
| | 32 |
|
| Total receivables, gross | $ | 1,758 |
| | $ | 2,202 |
| | $ | 3,960 |
| | $ | 1,419 |
| | $ | 1,811 |
| | $ | 3,230 |
|
Note 34 – Sales of Certain Receivables for further information.
Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables
We have entered into transactions to sell certain service accounts receivable and EIP accounts receivables. The transactions, including our continuing involvement with the sold receivables and the respective impacts to our consolidated financial statements, are described below.
In conjunction with the Merger, the total principal amount outstanding under Sprint’s accounts receivable facility of $2.3 billion was repaid on April 1, 2020, and the facility was terminated.
Sales of Service ReceivablesAccounts Receivable
Overview of the Transaction
In 2014, we entered into an arrangement to sell certain service accounts receivablesreceivable on a revolving basis and in November 2016, the arrangement was amended to increase the maximum funding commitment to $950 million (the “service receivable sale arrangement”) and extend the scheduled expiration date to March 2018. In February 2018,. The maximum funding commitment of the service receivable sale arrangement was again amended to extendis $950 million, and the scheduled expiration date tofacility expires in March 2019.2021. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the service receivable sale arrangement provided funding of $880$772 million and $907$924 million, respectively. Sales of receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis. The receivables consist of service charges currently due from customers and are short-term in nature.
In connection with the service receivable sale arrangement, we formed a wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary, which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity, to sell service accounts receivablesreceivable (the “Service BRE”). The Service BRE does not qualify as a VIE, and due to the significant level of control we exercise over the entity, it is consolidated. Pursuant to the service receivable sale arrangement, certain of our wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiaries transfer selected receivables to the Service BRE. The Service BRE then sells the receivables to an unaffiliated entity (the “Service VIE”), which was established to facilitate the sale of beneficial ownership interests in the receivables to certain third parties.
Variable Interest Entity
We determined that the Service VIE qualifies as a VIE as it lacks sufficient equity to finance its activities. We have a variable interest in the Service VIE but are not the primary beneficiary as we lack the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the Service VIE’s economic performance. Those activities include committing the Service VIE to legal agreements to purchase or sell assets, selecting which receivables are purchased in the service receivable sale arrangement, determining whether the Service VIE will sell interests in the purchased service receivables to other parties, funding of the entity and servicing of receivables. We do not hold the power to direct the key decisions underlying these activities. For example, while we act as the servicer of the sold receivables, which is considered a significant activity of the Service VIE, we are acting as an agent in our capacity as the servicer, and the counterparty to the service receivable sale arrangement has the ability to remove us as the servicing agent of the receivables at will with no recourse available to us. As we have determined we are not the primary beneficiary, the balances and results of the Service VIE are not included in our consolidated financial statements.
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and classification of assets, which consistsconsist primarily of the deferred purchase price, and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets that relate to our variable interest in the Service VIE:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| Other current assets | $ | 378 | | | $ | 350 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 0 | | | 25 | |
| Other current liabilities | 357 | | | 342 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Other current assets | $ | 236 |
| | $ | 207 |
|
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 25 |
| | 17 |
|
| Other current liabilities | 180 |
| | 129 |
|
Sales of EIP Receivables
Overview of the Transaction
In 2015, we entered into an arrangement to sell certain EIP accounts receivablesreceivable on a revolving basis (the “EIP sale arrangement”). The maximum funding commitment of the sale arrangement is $1.3 billion. In February 2020, we amended the
sale arrangement to provide for an alternative advance rate methodology for the EIP accounts receivable sold in the sale arrangement and in August 2017,to make certain other administrative changes. On November 2, 2020, we extended the scheduled expiration date of the EIP sale arrangement was amended to reduce the maximum funding commitment to $1.2 billion (the “EIP sale arrangement”) and extend the scheduled expiration date to November 2018. In December 2017,18, 2021.
On April 30, 2020, we agreed with the EIP sale arrangement was again amendedpurchaser banks to increaseupdate our collection policies to temporarily allow for flexibility for modifications to the maximum funding commitment to $1.3 billion. accounts receivable sold that are impacted by COVID-19 and exclusion of such accounts receivable from all pool performance triggers.
As of both December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the EIP sale arrangement provided funding of $1.3 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively.billion. Sales of EIP receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis. The receivables consist of customer EIP balances, which require monthly customer payments for up to 24 months.
In connection with this EIP sale arrangement, we formed a wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary, which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity (the “EIP BRE”). Pursuant to the EIP sale arrangement, our wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary transfers selected receivables to the EIP BRE. The EIP BRE then sells the receivables to a non-consolidated and unaffiliated third-party entity forover which we do not exercise any level of control, nor does the third-party entity qualify as a VIE.
Variable Interest Entity
We determined that the EIP BRE is a VIE as its equity investment at risk lacks the obligation to absorb a certain portion of its expected losses. We have a variable interest in the EIP BRE and have determined that we are the primary beneficiary based on our ability to direct the activities which most significantly impact the EIP BRE’s economic performance. Those activities include selecting which receivables are transferred into the EIP BRE and sold in the EIP sale arrangement and funding of the EIP BRE. Additionally, our equity interest in the EIP BRE obligates us to absorb losses and gives us the right to receive benefits from the EIP BRE that could potentially be significant to the EIP BRE. Accordingly, we determined that we are the primary beneficiary, and include the balances and results of operations of the EIP BRE in our consolidated financial statements.
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and classification of assets, which consistsconsist primarily of the deferred purchase price, and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets that relate to of the EIP BRE:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| Other current assets | $ | 388 | | | $ | 344 | |
| Other assets | 120 | | | 89 | |
| Other long-term liabilities | 4 | | | 18 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Other current assets | $ | 403 |
| | $ | 371 |
|
| Other assets | 109 |
| | 83 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | 3 |
| | 4 |
|
In addition, the EIP BRE is a separate legal entity with its own separate creditors who will be entitled, prior to any liquidation of the EIP BRE, to be satisfied prior to any value in the EIP BRE becoming available to us. Accordingly, the assets of the EIP BRE may not be used to settle our general obligations and creditors of the EIP BRE have limited recourse to our general credit.
Spectrum Licenses
Spectrum licenses are carried at costs incurred to acquire the spectrum licenses and the costs to prepare the spectrum licenses for their intended use, such as costs to clear acquired spectrum licenses. The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issues spectrum licenses which provide us with the exclusive right to utilize designated radio frequency spectrum within specific geographic service areas to provide wireless communications services. While spectrum licenses are issued for a fixed period of time, typically for up to 15 years, the FCC has granted license renewals routinely and at a nominal cost. The spectrum licenses held by us expire at various dates. We believe we will be able to meet all requirements necessary to secure renewal of our spectrum licenses at nominal costs. Moreover, we determined there are currently no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors that limit the useful lives of our spectrum licenses. Therefore, we determined the spectrum licenses should be treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets.
At times, we enter into agreements to sell or exchange spectrum licenses. Upon entering into the arrangement, if the transaction has been deemed to have commercial substance, spectrum licenses are reviewed for impairment. The licenses are transferred at their carrying value, as adjusted for any impairment recognized, to assets held for sale, which is included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets until approval and completion of the exchange or sale. Upon closing of the transaction, spectrum licenses acquired as part of an exchange of nonmonetary assets are recorded at fair value and the difference between the fair value of the spectrum licenses obtained, carrying value of the spectrum licenses transferred and cash paid, if any, is recognized as a Gain (loss) on disposal of spectrum licenses included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Our fair value estimates of spectrum licenses are based on information for which there is little or no observable market data. If the transaction lacks commercial substance or the fair value is not measurable, the acquired spectrum licenses are recorded at our carrying value of the spectrum assets transferred or exchanged.
Spectrum Leases
Through the Merger, the Company acquired lease agreements (the “Agreements”) with various educational and non-profit institutions that provide us with the right to use FCC spectrum licenses (Educational Broadband Services or “EBS spectrum”) in the 2.5 GHz band. In addition to the Agreements with educational institutions and private owners who hold the licenses, the Company also acquired direct ownership of spectrum licenses previously acquired by Sprint through government auctions or other acquisitions.
The Agreements with educational and certain non-profit institutions are typically for five to 10 years with automatic renewal provisions, bringing the total term of the agreement up to 30 years. A majority of the Agreements include a right of first refusal to acquire, lease or otherwise use the license at the end of the automatic renewal periods.
Leased FCC spectrum licenses are recorded as executory contracts whereby, as a result of business combination accounting, an intangible asset or liability is recorded reflecting the extent to which contractual terms are favorable or unfavorable to current market rates. These intangible assets or liabilities are amortized over the estimated remaining useful life of the lease agreements. Contractual lease payments are recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the arrangement, including renewals, and are presented in Costs of services within our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
The Agreements enhance the overall value of the Company’s owned spectrum licenses as the collective value is higher than the value of individual bands of spectrum within a specific geography. This value is derived from the ability to provide wireless service to customers across large geographic areas and maintain the same or similar wireless connectivity quality. This enhanced value from combining owned and leased spectrum licenses is referred to as an aggregation premium.
The aggregation premium is a component of the overall fair value of our owned FCC spectrum licenses, which are recorded as indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Impairment
We assess the carrying value of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, for potential impairment annually as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate such assets might be impaired.
When assessing goodwill for impairment, we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the 2 reporting units, wireless and Layer3, is less than its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying
amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized would not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
We test our spectrum licenses for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with our management of the overall business at a national level. We may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the estimated fair value of the intangible asset. If the estimated fair value of the spectrum licenses is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. We estimate fair value using the Greenfield methodology, which is an income approach based on discounted cash flows associated with the intangible asset, to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions.
Restricted Cash
Certain provisions of our debt agreements require us to maintain specified cash collateral balances. Amounts associated with these balances are considered to be restricted cash and are included within Other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Guarantee Liabilities
We offer a device trade-in program, Just Upgrade My Phone (“JUMP!”), which provides eligible customers a specified-price trade-in right to upgrade their device. Upon enrollment, participating customers must finance the purchase of a device on an EIP and have a qualifying T-Mobile monthly wireless service plan. Upon a qualifying JUMP! program upgrade, the customer’s remaining EIP balance is settled provided they trade-in their eligible used device in good working condition and purchase a new device from us on a new EIP.
For customers who enroll in JUMP!, we recognize a liability and reduce revenue for the portion of revenue which represents the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee. The guarantee liability is valued based on various economic and customer behavioral assumptions, which requires judgment, including estimating the customer's remaining EIP balance at trade-in, the expected fair value of the used device at trade-in, and the probability and timing of trade-in. When customers upgrade their device, the difference between the EIP balance credit to the customer and the fair value of the returned device is recorded against the guarantee liabilities. All assumptions are reviewed periodically.
Fair Value Measurements
We carry certain assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The three-tier hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value, which prioritizes the inputs based on the observability as of the measurement date, is as follows:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 Observable inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; and
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require us to develop assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the placement of assets and liabilities being measured within the fair value hierarchy.
The carrying values of Cash and cash equivalents, Accounts receivable, Accounts receivable from affiliates, Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and borrowings under our vendor financing arrangements approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The carrying values of EIP receivables approximate fair value as the receivables are recorded at their present value using an imputed interest rate. With the exception of certain long-term fixed-rate debt, there were no financial instruments with a carrying value materially different from their fair value. See Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements for a comparison of the carrying values and fair values of our short-term and long-term debt.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities and are measured at fair value. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges associated with forecasted debt issuances, changes in fair value are reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss until reclassified into Interest expense in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings, generally over the life of the related debt. Unrealized gains on derivatives designated in qualifying cash flow hedge relationships are recorded at fair value as assets, and unrealized losses are recorded at fair value as liabilities.
Revenue Recognition (Effective January 1, 2018)
We primarily generate our revenue from providing wireless services to customers and selling or leasing devices and accessories. Our contracts with customers may involve multiple performance obligations, which include wireless services, wireless devices or a combination thereof, and we allocate the transaction price between each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price.
Significant Judgments
The most significant judgments affecting the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with our customers include the following items:
•Revenue for service contracts that we assess are not probable of collection is not recognized until the contract is completed or terminated and cash is received. Collectibility is re-assessed when there is a significant change in facts or circumstances. Our assessment of collectibility considers whether we may limit our exposure to credit risk through our right to stop transferring additional service in the event the customer is delinquent as well as certain contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses” above, for additional discussion on how we assess credit risk.
•Promotional EIP bill credits offered to a customer on an equipment sale that are paid over time and are contingent on the customer maintaining a service contract may result in an extended service contract based on whether a substantive penalty is deemed to exist. Determining whether contingent EIP bill credits result in a substantive termination penalty may require significant judgment.
•The identification of distinct performance obligations within our service plans may require significant judgment.
•Revenue is recorded net of costs paid to another party for performance obligations where we arrange for the other party to transfer goods or services to the customer (i.e., when we are acting as an agent). For example, performance obligations relating to services provided by third-party content providers where we neither control a right to the content provider’s service nor control the underlying service itself are presented net because we are acting as an agent. The determination of whether we control the underlying service or right to the service prior to our transfer to the customer requires, at times, significant judgment.
•Our products are generally sold with a right of return, which is accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize. Device return levels are estimated based on the expected value method as there are a large number of contracts with similar characteristics and the outcome of each contract is independent of the others. Historical return rate experience is a significant input to our expected value methodology.
•Sales of Receivables
The transfers of service receivables and EIP receivablesequipment to indirect dealers who have been identified as our customer (referred to as the sell-in model) often include credits subsequently paid to the non-consolidated entitiesdealer as a reimbursement for any discount promotions offered to the end consumer. These credits (payments to a customer, the dealer) are accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize from the sales of financial assets. Onceequipment to indirect dealers and are estimated based on historical experience and other factors, such as expected promotional activity.
•The determination of the standalone selling price for contracts that involve more than one performance obligation may require significant judgment, such as when the selling price of a good or service is not readily observable.
Wireless Services Revenue
We generate our wireless services revenues from providing access to, and usage of, our wireless communications network. Service revenues also include revenues earned for providing premium services to customers, such as device insurance services. Service contracts are billed monthly either in advance or arrears, or are prepaid. Generally, service revenue is recognized as we
satisfy our performance obligation to transfer service to our customers. We typically satisfy our stand-ready performance obligations, including unlimited wireless services, evenly over the contract term. For usage-based and prepaid wireless services, we satisfy our performance obligations when services are rendered.
Consideration payable to a customer is treated as a reduction of the total transaction price, unless the payment is in exchange for a distinct good or service, such as certain commissions paid to dealers, in which case the payment is treated as a purchase of that distinct good or service.
Federal Universal Service Fund (“USF”) and other fees are assessed by various governmental authorities in connection with the services we provide to our customers and are included in Cost of services. When we separately bill and collect these regulatory fees from customers, they are recorded gross in Total service revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we recorded approximately $267 million, $93 million and $161 million, respectively, of USF fees on a gross basis.
We have made an accounting policy election to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by us from a customer (e.g., sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes).
Wireline Revenue
Performance obligations related to our Wireline customers include the provision of domestic and international data communications services, generally to complement business wireless customers. Wireline revenues are included within Roaming and other service revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Equipment Revenues
We generate equipment revenues from the sale or lease of mobile communication devices and accessories. For performance obligations related to equipment contracts, we typically transfer control at a point in time when the device or accessory is delivered to, and accepted by, the customer or dealer. We have elected to account for shipping and handling activities that occur after control of the related good transfers as fulfillment activities instead of assessing such activities as performance obligations. We estimate variable consideration (e.g., device returns or certain payments to indirect dealers) primarily based on historical experience. Equipment sales not probable of collection are generally recorded as payments are received. Our assessment of collectibility considers contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk.
We offer certain customers the option to pay for devices and accessories in installments using an EIP. Generally, we recognize as a reduction of the total transaction price the effects of a financing component in contracts where customers purchase their devices and accessories on an EIP with a term of more than one year, including those financing components that are not considered to be significant to the contract. However, we have elected the practical expedient to not recognize the effects of a significant financing component for contracts where we expect, at contract inception, that the period between the transfer of a performance obligation to a customer and the customer’s payment for that performance obligation will be one year or less.
In addition, for customers who enroll in our JUMP! program, we recognize a liability based on the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee. The fair value of the guarantee is deducted from the transaction price and the remaining transaction price is allocated to other elements of the contract, including service and equipment performance obligations. See “Guarantee Liabilities” above for further information.
JUMP! On Demand allows customers to lease a device over a period of up to 18 months and upgrade it for a new device up to one time per month. To date, substantially all of our leased wireless devices are accounted for as operating leases and estimated contract consideration is allocated between lease and non-lease elements (such as service and equipment performance obligations) based on the relative standalone selling price of each performance obligation in the contract. Lease revenues are recorded as equipment revenues and recognized as earned on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Lease revenues on contracts not probable of collection are limited to the amount of payments received. See “Property and Equipment” above for further information.
Advertising and Search Revenues
Effective April 1, 2020, certain of our advertising and search revenues are now presented within Roaming and other service revenues, resulting in a reclassification of $506 million and $449 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively. These revenues were previously presented within Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
Imputed Interest on EIP Receivables
We record the effects of financing on all EIP loans regardless of whether or not the financing is considered to be significant. The imputation of interest results in a discount of the EIP receivable, thereby adjusting the transaction price of the contract with the customer, which is then allocated to the performance obligations of the arrangement.
For transactions where we recognize a significant financing component, judgment is required to determine the discount rate. For EIP sales, the discount rate used to adjust the transaction price primarily reflects current market interest rates and the estimated credit risk of the customer. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses” above, for additional discussion on how we assess credit risk.
For indirect channel loans to the end service customer in which the sale of the device was to the dealer (sell-in basis), the effect of imputing interest is recognized as a reduction to service revenue, the only performance obligation with the service customer as the device sale was recognized when transferred to the dealer, over the service contract period.
Our policies for imputed interest on EIP receivables are applied to loans originated for Sprint and Boost (up to the sale of the Prepaid Business to DISH on July 1, 2020) customers subsequent to Merger close.
Contract Balances
Generally, our devices and service plans are available at standard prices, which are maintained on price lists and published on our website and/or within our retail stores.
For contracts that involve more than one product or service that are identified for sale,as separate performance obligations, the receivabletransaction price is allocated to the performance obligations based on their relative standalone selling prices. The standalone selling price is the price at which we would sell the good or service separately to a customer and is most commonly evidenced by the price at which we sell that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers.
A contract asset is recorded when revenue is recognized in advance of our right to receive consideration (i.e., we must perform additional services in order to receive consideration). Amounts are recorded as receivables when our right to consideration is unconditional. When consideration is received, or we have an unconditional right to consideration in advance of delivery of goods or services, a contract liability is recorded. The transaction price can include non-refundable upfront fees, which are allocated to the identifiable performance obligations.
Contract assets are included in Other current assets and Other assets and contract liabilities are included in Deferred revenue in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Contract Modifications
Our service contracts allow customers to frequently modify their contracts without incurring penalties, in many cases. Each time a contract is modified, we evaluate the change in scope or price of the contract to determine if the modification should be treated as a separate contract, as if there is a termination of the existing contract and creation of a new contract, or if the modification should be considered a change associated with the existing contract. We typically do not have significant impacts from contract modifications.
Contract Costs
We incur certain incremental costs to obtain a contract that we expect to recover, such as sales commissions. We record an asset when these incremental costs to obtain a contract are incurred and amortize them on a systematic basis that is consistent with the transfer to the customer of the goods or services to which the asset relates.
We capitalize postpaid sales commissions for service activation as costs to acquire a contract and amortize them over the estimated period of benefit, currently 24 months. For capitalized contract costs, determining the amortization period over which such costs are recognized as well as assessing the indicators of impairment may require significant judgment. Prepaid commissions are expensed as incurred as their estimated period of benefit does not extend beyond 12 months. Commissions
paid upon device upgrade are not capitalized if the remaining customer contract is less than one year. Commissions paid when the customer has a lease are treated as initial direct costs and recognized over the lease term.
Our policies for the capitalization and amortization of costs to acquire a contract are applied to the Sprint, Boost (up to the sale of the Prepaid Business to Dish on July 1, 2020) and Assurance Wireless brands subsequent to the Merger close.
Incremental costs to obtain equipment contracts (e.g., commissions paid on device and accessory sales) are recognized when the equipment is transferred to the customer.
Brightstar Distribution
We had arrangements with Brightstar US, Inc. (“Brightstar”), a subsidiary of SoftBank, whereby Brightstar provided supply chain and inventory management services to us in our indirect channels. T-Mobile sold devices through Brightstar to T-Mobile indirect channels who then sold the device to an end customer.
The supply chain and inventory management arrangement included, among other things, that Brightstar may purchase inventory from the original equipment manufacturers to sell through to our indirect channels. As compensation for these services, we remitted per unit fees to Brightstar for each device sold to these indirect dealers.
Devices sold from T-Mobile to Brightstar do not meet the criteria for a sale. Devices transferred from T-Mobile to Brightstar remain in inventory until control is transferred upon the sale of the device to the end customer, and in some circumstances to the indirect dealer.
For customers who choose to lease a device previously sold to the indirect dealer, T-Mobile will repurchase the device from the indirect dealer and originate a lease directly with the end customer. Repurchase activity from the indirect dealer is estimated and treated as a right of return, reducing equipment revenue at the lowertime of costsale to the indirect dealer. Upon lease to the end customer, T-Mobile recognizes lease revenue over the associated lease term within Equipment revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
By December 31, 2020, we had terminated or fair value. Upon sale,restructured most of our arrangements with Brightstar, except for reverse logistics and trade-in services.
Leases (effective January 1, 2019)
Cell Site, Retail Store and Office Facility Leases
We are a lessee for non-cancelable operating and financing leases for cell sites, switch sites, retail stores, network equipment and office facilities with contractual terms that generally extend through 2035. Additionally, we derecognizelease dark fiber through non-cancelable operating leases with contractual terms that generally extend through 2041. The majority of cell site leases have a non-cancelable term of five to 15 years with several renewal options that can extend the lease term from five to 35 years. Some of these leases have escalating rentals during the initial lease term and during subsequent optional renewal periods. We recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for operating leases based on the net carrying amountpresent value of future minimum lease payments. The right-of-use asset for an operating lease is based on the lease liability. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable lease term and renewal periods that are considered reasonably certain.
In addition, we have financing leases for certain network equipment that generally have a non-cancelable lease term of two to five years. The financing leases do not have renewal options and contain a bargain purchase option at the end of the receivables.lease. We recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for financing leases based on the net cashpresent value of future minimum lease payments. The right-of-use asset for a finance lease is based on the lease liability. Lease expense for our financing leases is comprised of the amortization of the right-of-use asset and interest expense recognized based on the effective interest method.
We consider several factors in assessing whether renewal periods are reasonably certain of being exercised, including the continued maturation of our nationwide network, technological advances within the telecommunications industry and the availability of alternative sites. We have concluded it is not reasonably certain that we would exercise the options to extend or terminate our leases. Therefore, as of the lease commencement date, our lease terms generally do not include these options. We include options to extend or terminate a lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option.
In determining the discount rate used to measure the right-of-use asset and lease liability, we use rates implicit in the lease, or if not readily available, we use our incremental borrowing rate. Our incremental borrowing rate is based on an estimated secured
rate comprised of a risk-free LIBOR rate plus a credit spread as secured by our assets. Determining a credit spread as secured by our assets may require significant judgment.
Certain of our lease agreements include rental payments based on changes in the consumer price index (“CPI”). Lease liabilities are not remeasured as a result of changes in the CPI; instead, changes in the CPI are treated as variable lease payments and are excluded from the measurement of the right-of-use asset and lease liability. These payments are recognized in the period in which the related obligation is incurred. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
Generally, we elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components in arrangements where we are the lessee. For arrangements in which we are the lessor of wireless devices, we did not elect this practical expedient. We did not elect the short-term lease recognition exemption; as such, leases with terms shorter than 12-months are included as a right-of-use asset and lease liability.
Rental revenues and expenses associated with co-location tower sites are presented on a net basis under Topic 842. These revenues and expenses were presented on a gross basis under Topic 840. See Note 17 - Leases for further information.
See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, for additional discussion regarding the accounting policies that governed leases prior to January 1, 2019.
Cell Tower Monetization Transactions
In 2012, we entered into a prepaid master lease in which we as the lessor provided the rights to utilize tower sites and we leased back space on certain of those towers.Prior to the Merger, Sprint entered into a similar lease-out and leaseback arrangement which we assumed in the Merger.
These arrangements are treated as failed sale leasebacks in which the proceeds received are reported as a financing obligation. The principal payments on the tower obligations are included in Other, net within Net cash provided by operating(used in) financing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.Our historical tower site asset costs are reported in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are depreciated. See Note 9 - Tower Obligations for further information.
The proceeds are net ofSprint Retirement Pension Plan
Through the deferred purchase price, consisting ofMerger, we acquired the assets and assumed the liabilities associated with the Sprint Retirement Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”), which is a receivable from the purchasers that entitles usdefined benefit pension plan providing postretirement benefits to certain collections onemployees. As of December 31, 2005, the receivables. We recognizePension Plan was amended to freeze benefit plan accruals for participants.
The investments in the collection of the deferred purchase price in Net cash provided by operating activities as it is dependent on collection of the customer receivables and is not subject to significant interest rate risk. The deferred purchase price represents a financial asset that is primarily tied to the creditworthiness of the customers and which can be settled in such a way that we may not recover substantially all of our recorded investment, due to default by the customers on the underlying receivables. We elected, at inception, to measure the deferred purchase pricePension Plan are measured at fair value on a recurring basis each quarter using quoted market prices or the net asset value per share as a practical expedient. The projected benefit obligations associated with changes in fair valuethe Pension Plan are determined based on actuarial models utilizing mortality tables and discount rates applied to the expected benefit term. See Note 11 - Employee Compensation and Benefit Plans for further information on the Pension Plan.
Advertising Expense
We expense the cost of advertising and other promotional expenditures to market our services and products as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, advertising expenses included in Selling, general and administrative expenseexpenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.Income were $1.8 billion, $1.6 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences are realized. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions within the carryforward periods available.
We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We
assess whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position and adjust the unrecognized tax benefits in light of changes in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law.
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of adjustments, net of tax, related to unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, available-for-sale securities, foreign currency translation and pension and other postretirement benefits. This is reported in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized in earnings.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation cost for stock awards, which include restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”), is measured at fair value on the grant date and recognized as expense, net of expected forfeitures, over the related service period. The fair value of stock awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. RSUs are recognized as expense using the straight-line method. PRSUs are recognized as expense following a graded vesting schedule with their performance re-assessed and updated on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as changes in facts and circumstances warrant.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing Net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of outstanding stock options, RSUs and PRSUs, calculated using the treasury stock method. See Note 16 - Earnings Per Share for further information.
Variable Interest Entities
VIEs are entities that lack sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, have equity investors that do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating to the entity's operations through voting rights, do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses or do not have the right to receive the residual returns of the entity. The most common type of VIE is a special purpose entity (“SPE”). SPEs are commonly used in securitization transactions in order to isolate certain assets and distribute the cash flows from those assets to investors. SPEs are generally structured to insulate investors from claims on the SPEs’ assets by creditors of other entities, including the creditors of the seller of the assets, these SPEs are commonly referred to as being bankruptcy remote.
The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is the party which has both the power to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, and through its interests in the VIE, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE which could potentially be significant to the VIE. We consolidate VIEs when we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary or when the VIE cannot be deconsolidated. See Note 4 - Sales of Certain Receivables and Note 9 - Tower Obligations for further information.
In assessing which party is the primary beneficiary, all the facts and circumstances are considered, including each party’s role in establishing the VIE and its ongoing rights and responsibilities. This assessment includes, first, identifying the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and second, identifying which party, if any, has power over those activities. In general, the parties that make the most significant decisions affecting the VIE (such as asset managers and servicers) or have the right to unilaterally remove those decision-makers are deemed to have the power to direct the activities of a VIE.
Device Purchases Cash Flow Presentation
We classify all device purchases, whether acquired for sale or lease, as operating cash outflows as our predominant strategy is to sell devices to customers rather than lease them. SeeNote 20 – Additional Financial Information for disclosures ofLeased devices transferred from inventory to property and equipment and Returned leased devices transferred from property and equipment to inventory.
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Current Year
Receivables and Expected Credit Losses
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” and has since modified the standard with several ASUs (collectively, the “new credit loss standard”). The new credit loss standard requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectibility of the reported amount. The new credit loss standard became effective for us, and we adopted the standard, on January 1, 2020. The new credit loss standard required a cumulative-effect adjustment to Accumulated deficit at the date of initial application, and as a result, we did not restate prior periods presented in the consolidated financial statements.
Under the new credit loss standard, we recognize lifetime expected credit losses at the inception of our credit risk exposures, whereas we previously recognized credit losses only when it was probable that they had been incurred. We also recognize expected credit losses on our EIP receivables, which are inclusive of all installment receivables acquired in the Merger or issued thereafter, separately from, and in addition to, any unamortized discount on those receivables. Prior to the adoption of the new credit loss standard, we had offset our estimate of probable losses on our EIP receivables by the amount of the related unamortized discounts on those receivables. We have developed an expected credit loss model incorporating forward-looking loss indicators. The cumulative effect of initially applying the new credit loss standard on our receivables portfolio on January 1, 2020 was an increase to our allowance for credit losses of $91 million, a decrease to our net deferred tax liabilities of $24 million and an increase to our Accumulated deficit of $67 million.
For EIP receivables acquired in the Merger, we also recognize expected credit losses separately from, and in addition to, the acquisition date fair value of the acquired EIP receivables.
Cloud Computing Arrangements
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Topic 350): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract.” The standard aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The standard also requires the presentation of the amortization of the capitalized implementation costs in the same line item in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income as the fees associated with the hosting arrangement. The standard became effective for us, and we adopted the standard, on January 1, 2020. We adopted the standard on a prospective basis applying it to implementation costs incurred subsequent to January 1, 2020 and, as a result, did not restate the prior periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Income Taxes
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.” The standard removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. We early adopted the standard on January 1, 2020 and have applied the standard retrospectively to all periods presented. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Guarantor Financial Information
On March 2, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted amendments to the financial disclosure requirements for guarantors and issuers of guaranteed securities, as well as for affiliates whose securities collateralize a registrant’s securities. The amendments revise Rules 3-10 and 3-16 of Regulation S-X, and relocate part of Rule 3-10 and all of Rule 3-16 to the new Article 13 in Regulation S-X, which is comprised of new Rules 13-01 and 13-02. We early adopted the requirements of the amendments on January 1, 2020, which included replacing guarantor condensed consolidating financial information with summarized financial information for the consolidated obligor group (Parent, Issuer, and Guarantor Subsidiaries) and no longer requiring guarantor cash flow information, financial information for non-guarantor subsidiaries, or a reconciliation to the consolidated results.
Regulation S-K Modernization Amendments
On August 26, 2020, the SEC adopted amendments to modernize the description of business (Item 101), legal proceedings (Item 103), and risk factor disclosures (Item 105) that registrants are required to make pursuant to Regulation S-K. The amendments are intended to elicit improved disclosures for investors and add efficiencies to the compliance efforts of registrants. The amendments are also intended to improve the readability of disclosure documents, as well as discourage repetition and reduce the disclosure of unnecessary information. The amendments became effective for us, and we adopted the amendments on November 9, 2020, which included making certain updates to our description of business and risk factor disclosures within our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Reference Rate Reform
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” The standard provides temporary optional expedients and allows for certain exceptions to applying existing GAAP for contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued as a result of reference rate reform. The standard is available for adoption for a limited time through December 31, 2022. We are currently evaluating the impact this standard will have, including optional expedients, on our consolidated financial statements.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Selected Financial Data and Supplementary Information Amendments
On January 11, 2021, the SEC adopted amendments to eliminate the requirement for Selected Financial Data, streamline the requirement to disclose Supplementary Financial Information and amend Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”). These amendments are intended to eliminate duplicative disclosures and modernize and enhance MD&A for the benefit of investors, while simplifying compliance efforts for registrants. The amendments became effective on February 10, 2021. We are currently evaluating the impact these amendments will have on our consolidated financial statements. We will apply the amendments, as applicable, to relevant filings made with the SEC subsequent to this Form 10-K.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the SEC did not have, or are not expected to have, a significant impact on our present or future consolidated financial statements.
Note 2 – Business Combination
Business Combination Agreement and Amendments
On April 29, 2018, we entered into a Business Combination Agreement for the Merger. The Business Combination Agreement was subsequently amended to provide that, following the closing of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement (collectively, the “Transactions”), SoftBank Group Corp. (“SoftBank”) would indemnify us against certain specified matters and the loss of value arising out of, or resulting from, cessation of access to spectrum under certain circumstances and subject to certain limitations and qualifications.
On February 20, 2020, T-Mobile, SoftBank and Deutsche Telekom AG (“DT”) entered into a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”). Pursuant to the Letter Agreement, SoftBank agreed to cause its applicable affiliates to surrender to T-Mobile, for no additional consideration, an aggregate of 48,751,557 shares of T-Mobile common stock (such number of shares, the “SoftBank Specified Shares Amount”), effective immediately following the Effective Time (as defined in the Business Combination Agreement), making SoftBank’s exchange ratio 11.31 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock. This resulted in an effective exchange ratio of approximately 11.00 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock immediately following the closing of the Merger, an increase from the originally agreed 9.75 shares. Sprint stockholders other than SoftBank received the original fixed exchange ratio of 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock for each share of Sprint common stock, or the equivalent of approximately 9.75 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock.
The Letter Agreement requires T-Mobile to issue to SoftBank 48,751,557 shares of T-Mobile common stock, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Letter Agreement, for no additional consideration, if certain conditions are met. The
issuance of these shares is contingent on the trailing 45-day volume-weighted average price per share of T-Mobile common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market being equal to or greater than $150.00, at any time during the period commencing on April 1, 2022 and ending on December 31, 2025. If the threshold price is not met, then NaN of the SoftBank Specified Shares Amount will be issued.
Closing of Sprint Merger
On April 1, 2020, we completed the Merger, and as a result, Sprint and its subsidiaries became wholly owned consolidated subsidiaries of T-Mobile. Sprint was the fourth-largest telecommunications company in the U.S. offering a comprehensive range of wireless and wireline communication products and services. As a combined company, we expect to be able to rapidly launch a broad and deep nationwide 5G network, accelerate innovation, increase competition in the U.S. wireless, video and broadband industries and achieve significant synergies and cost reductions by eliminating redundancies within the combined network as well as other business processes and operations. We combined the Sprint and T-Mobile operations under the T-Mobile brand nationwide on August 2, 2020.
Upon completion of the Merger, each share of Sprint common stock was exchanged for 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock, or 9.75 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock. After adjustments, including the holdback of the SoftBank Specified Shares Amount and fractional shares, we issued 373,396,310 shares of T-Mobile common stock to Sprint stockholders. The fair value of the T-Mobile common stock provided in exchange for Sprint common stock was approximately $31.3 billion.
Additional components of consideration included the repayment of certain of Sprint’s debt, replacement equity awards attributable to pre-combination services, contingent consideration and a cash payment received for certain reimbursed Merger expenses.
Immediately following the closing of the Merger and the surrender of the SoftBank Specified Shares Amount, pursuant to the Letter Agreement described above, DT and SoftBank held, directly or indirectly, approximately 43.6% and 24.7%, respectively, of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock, with the remaining approximately 31.7% of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock held by other stockholders.
Consideration Transferred
The acquisition-date fair value of consideration transferred in the Merger totaled $40.8 billion, comprised of the following:
| | | | | |
| (in millions) | April 1, 2020 |
Fair value of T-Mobile common stock issued to Sprint stockholders (1) | $ | 31,328 | |
Fair value of T-Mobile replacement equity awards attributable to pre-combination service (2) | 323 | |
Repayment of Sprint’s debt (including accrued interest and prepayment penalties) (3) | 7,396 | |
| |
Value of contingent consideration (4) | 1,882 | |
Payment received from selling stockholder (5) | (102) | |
| Total consideration exchanged | $ | 40,827 | |
(1) Represents the fair value of T-Mobile common stock issued to Sprint stockholders pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, less shares surrendered by SoftBank pursuant to the Letter Agreement. The fair value is based on 373,396,310 shares of Sprint common stock issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2020, an exchange ratio of 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock per share of Sprint common stock, less 48,751,557 T-Mobile shares surrendered by SoftBank which are treated as contingent consideration, and the closing price per share of T-Mobile common stock on NASDAQ on March 31, 2020, of $83.90, as shares were transferred to Sprint stockholders prior to the opening of markets on April 1, 2020.
(2) Equity-based awards held by Sprint employees prior to the acquisition date have been replaced with T-Mobile equity-based awards. The portion of the equity-based awards that relates to services performed by the employee prior to the acquisition date is included within consideration transferred, and includes stock options, restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units.
(3) Represents the cash consideration paid concurrent with the close of the Merger to retire certain Sprint debt, as required by change in control provisions of the debt, plus interest and prepayment penalties.
(4) Represents the fair value of the SoftBank Specified Shares Amount contingent consideration that may be issued as set forth in the Letter Agreement.
(5) Represents receipt of a cash payment from SoftBank for certain expenses associated with the Merger and is presented in Cash paid for acquisition of companies, net of cash acquired within our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The SoftBank Specified Shares Amount was determined to be contingent consideration with an acquisition-date fair value of $1.9 billion. We estimated the fair value using the income approach, a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model, whereby a Monte Carlo simulation method estimated the probability of different outcomes as the likelihood of achieving the 45-day volume-weighted average price threshold is not easily predicted. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and, therefore, represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The key
assumptions in applying the income approach include estimated future share-price volatility, which was based on historical market trends and estimated future performance of T-Mobile.
The maximum amount of contingent consideration that could be issued to SoftBank has an estimated value of $7.3 billion, based on SoftBank Specified Shares Amount of 48,751,557 multiplied by the defined volume-weighted average price per share of $150.00. The contingent consideration that could be delivered to SoftBank is classified within equity and is not subject to remeasurement.
Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
We accounted for the Merger as a business combination. The identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Sprint were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date and consolidated with those of T-Mobile. Assigning fair market values to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of an acquisition requires the use of significant judgment regarding estimates and assumptions. For the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, we used the cost, income and market approaches, including market participant assumptions.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values for each major class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. We retained the services of certified valuation specialists to assist with assigning estimated values to certain acquired assets and assumed liabilities. As of December 31, 2020, the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is substantially complete except for the finalization of certain aspects of spectrum valuation, the valuation of certain income tax matters and loss contingencies.
| | | | | |
| (in millions) | April 1, 2020 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,084 | |
| Accounts receivable | 1,781 | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables | 1,088 | |
| Inventory | 658 | |
| Prepaid expenses | 140 | |
| Assets held for sale | 1,908 | |
| Other current assets | 631 | |
| Property and equipment | 18,435 | |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | 6,583 | |
| Financing lease right-of-use assets | 291 | |
| Goodwill | 9,401 | |
| Spectrum licenses | 45,400 | |
| Other intangible assets | 6,325 | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net | 247 | |
Other assets (1) | 540 | |
| Total assets acquired | 95,512 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 4,944 | |
| Short-term debt | 2,760 | |
| Deferred revenue | 508 | |
| Short-term operating lease liabilities | 1,818 | |
| Short-term financing lease liabilities | 8 | |
| Liabilities held for sale | 475 | |
| Other current liabilities | 671 | |
| Long-term debt | 29,037 | |
| Tower obligations | 950 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 3,513 | |
| Operating lease liabilities | 5,615 | |
| Financing lease liabilities | 12 | |
| |
| Other long-term liabilities | 4,374 | |
| Total liabilities assumed | 54,685 | |
| |
| Total consideration transferred | $ | 40,827 | |
(1) Included in Other assets acquired is $80 million in restricted cash.
Amounts previously disclosed for the estimated values of certain acquired assets and liabilities assumed have been revised based on additional information arising subsequent to the initial valuation.
Significant Measurement Period Adjustments
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized measurement period adjustments to reflect facts and circumstances in existence as of the date of the Merger. These adjustments included:
•An increase of $1.2 billion in Property and equipment related to the finalization of valuations related to certain tower assets and an increase of $1.7 billion in Other long-term liabilities associated with contract terms that are unfavorable to market terms. See Note 9 – Tower Obligations for further information; and •A decrease of $690 million in Deferred tax liabilities resulting from a $357 million reclassification from deferred tax liabilities to current liabilities and the continued assessment of valuation allowance necessary as of the date of the Merger along with tax effecting measurement period adjustments. See Note 13 - Income Taxes for further information.
The measurement period adjustments did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2020. The net impact of the measurement period adjustments resulted in a net increase to goodwill.
Intangible Assets and Liabilities
Goodwill with a provisionally assigned value of $9.4 billion represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The preliminary goodwill recognized includes synergies expected to be achieved from the operations of the combined company, the assembled workforce of Sprint and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition. Expected synergies include the cost savings from the planned integration of network infrastructure, facilities, personnel and systems. NaN of the goodwill resulting from the Merger is deductible for tax purposes. All of the goodwill acquired is allocated to the wireless reporting unit.
Other intangible assets include $4.9 billion of customer relationships with a weighted-average useful life of eight years and tradenames of $207 million with a useful life of two years. Leased spectrum arrangements that have favorable (asset) and unfavorable (liability) terms compared to current market rates were assigned preliminary fair values of $790 million and $197 million, respectively, with 18 year and 19 year weighted average useful lives, respectively.
The preliminary fair value of Spectrum licenses of $45.4 billion was estimated using the income approach, specifically a Greenfield model. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and, therefore, represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The key assumptions in applying the income approach include the discount rate, market share, estimated capital and operating expenditures, forecasted service revenue and long-term growth rate for a hypothetical market participant that enters the wireless industry and builds a nationwide wireless network.
Acquired Receivables
The fair value of the assets acquired include Accounts receivable of $1.8 billion and EIP receivables of $1.3 billion. The unpaid principal balance under these contracts as of the Merger date was $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively. The difference between the fair value and the unpaid principal balance primarily represents amounts expected to be uncollectible.
Indemnification Assets and Contingent Liabilities
Pursuant to Amendment No 2. to the Business Combination Agreement, SoftBank agreed to indemnify us against certain specified matters and losses. As of December 31, 2020, we have recorded a contingent liability and an offsetting indemnification asset for the expected reimbursement by SoftBank for certain Lifeline matters that have not been resolved. The liability is presented in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and the indemnification asset is presented in Other current assets within our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In November 2020, we entered into a consent decree with the FCC to resolve certain Lifeline matters, which resulted in a payment of $200 million by SoftBank. We expect that any additional liabilities related to these indemnified matters would be indemnified and reimbursed by SoftBank.
Transaction Costs
We recognized transaction costs of $201 million, $106 million and $71 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These costs were associated with legal and professional services and were recognized as Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited pro forma financial information gives effect to the Transactions as if they had been completed on January 1, 2019. The unaudited pro forma information was prepared in accordance with the requirements of ASC 805, which is a different basis than pro forma information prepared under Article 11 of Regulation S-X (“Article 11”). As such, they are not directly comparable with historical results for stand-alone T-Mobile prior to April 1, 2020, historical results for T-Mobile from April 1, 2020 that reflect the Transactions and are inclusive of the results and operations of Sprint, nor our previously provided pro forma financials prepared in accordance with Article 11. The pro forma results for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 include the impact of several adjustments to previously reported operating results. The pro forma adjustments are based on historically reported transactions by the respective companies. The pro forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the acquisition.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions, except per share amounts) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Total revenues | | | | | $ | 74,681 | | | $ | 70,607 | |
| Income from continuing operations | | | | | 3,302 | | | 185 | |
| Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | | | 677 | | | 1,594 | |
| Net income | | | | | 3,979 | | | 1,792 | |
Significant nonrecurring pro forma adjustments include:
•Transaction costs of $559 million are assumed to have occurred on January 1, 2019, and are recognized as if incurred in the first quarter of 2019;
•The Prepaid Business divested on July 1, 2020, is assumed to have been classified as discontinued operations as of January 1, 2019, and the related activities are presented in Income from discontinued operations, net of tax;
•Permanent financing issued and debt redemptions occurring in connection with the closing of the Merger are assumed to have occurred on January 1, 2019, and historical interest expense associated with repaid borrowings is removed;
•Tangible and intangible assets are assumed to be recorded at their estimated fair values as of the pro forma close date of January 1, 2019 and are depreciated or amortized over their estimated useful lives; and
The selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is provided for illustrative purposes only and does not purport to represent what the actual consolidated results of operations would have been had the Transactions actually occurred on January 1, 2019, nor do they purport to project the future consolidated results of operations.
For the periods subsequent to the Merger close date, the acquired Sprint subsidiaries contributed total revenues and operating income of $20.5 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020, that were included in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Financing
In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile USA”) entered into a commitment letter, dated as of April 29, 2018 (as amended and restated on May 15, 2018 and on September 6, 2019, the “Commitment Letter”). On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we drew down on our $19.0 billion New Secured Bridge Loan Facility and our $4.0 billion New Secured Term Loan Facility (each as defined below). We used the net proceeds from the drawdown of the secured facilities to refinance certain existing debt of us, Sprint and our and Sprint’s respective subsidiaries and for post-closing general corporate purposes of the combined company. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.
In connection with the financing provided for in the Commitment Letter, we incurred certain fees payable to the financial institutions. On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we paid $355 million in Commitment Letter fees to certain financial institutions. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.
In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, DT and T-Mobile USA entered into a Financing Matters Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2018 (the “Financing Matters Agreement”), pursuant to which DT agreed, among other things, to consent to, subject to certain conditions, amendments to certain existing debt owed to DT, in connection with the Merger. On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we made a payment for requisite consents to DT of $13 million. SeeNote 8 – Debtfor further information.
On May 18, 2018, under the terms and conditions described in the Consent Solicitation Statement dated as of May 14, 2018 (the “Consent Solicitation Statement”), we obtained consents necessary to effect amendments to certain existing debt of us and our subsidiaries. On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we made payments for requisite consents to third-party note holders of $95 million. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.
Regulatory Matters
The Transactions were the subject of various legal and regulatory proceedings involving a number of state and federal agencies. In connection with those proceedings and the approval of the Transactions, we have certain commitments and other obligations to various state and federal agencies and certain nongovernmental organizations. See Note 18 - Commitments and Contingencies for further information.
Prepaid Transaction
On July 26, 2019, we entered into the Asset Purchase Agreement with Sprint and DISH, pursuant to which, following the consummation of the Merger, DISH would acquire the Prepaid Business.
On June 17, 2020, T-Mobile, Sprint and DISH entered into the First Amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the First Amendment of the Asset Purchase Agreement, T-Mobile, Sprint and DISH agreed to proceed with the closing of the Prepaid Transaction in accordance with the Asset Purchase Agreement on July 1, 2020, subject to the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the terms and conditions of the Consent Decree.
On July 1, 2020, pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, we completed the Prepaid Transaction. Upon closing of the Prepaid Transaction, we received $1.4 billion from DISH for the Prepaid Business, subject to working capital adjustments. See Note 12 - Discontinued Operations for further information.
Shenandoah Personal Communications Company Affiliate Relationship
Sprint PCS (specifically Sprint Spectrum L.P.) is party to a variety of publicly filed agreements with Shenandoah Personal Communications Company LLC (“Shentel”), pursuant to which Shentel is the exclusive provider of Sprint PCS’s wireless mobility communications network products in certain parts of Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Pursuant to one such agreement, the Sprint PCS Management Agreement, dated November 5, 1999 (as amended, supplemented and modified from time to time, the “Management Agreement”), Sprint PCS was granted an option to purchase Shentel’s wireless telecommunications assets used to provide services pursuant to the Management Agreement. On August 26, 2020, Sprint, now our direct subsidiary, on behalf of and as the direct or indirect owner of Sprint PCS, exercised its option by delivering a binding notice of exercise to Shentel. The exercise of this option triggered a requirement for the parties to engage three independent valuation providers (the “Valuation Providers”) to calculate the “entire business value” (the “Entire Business Value”) of such wireless telecommunications assets, pursuant to a formula and valuation process prescribed in the Management Agreement.
Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on February 1, 2021, in accordance with the Management Agreement and other agreed-upon terms, the Valuation Providers determined and calculated the Entire Business Value of Shentel’s wireless telecommunication assets used to provide services pursuant to the Management Agreement to be $2.1 billion, and correspondingly, the base purchase price for such wireless telecommunication assets shall be ninety percent (90%) of that Entire Business Value amount ($1.9 billion), subject to certain other purchase price adjustments prescribed by the Management Agreement and such additional purchase price adjustments agreed by the parties. The parties are negotiating the remaining outstanding terms of a definitive agreement to govern the purchase of Shentel’s wireless telecommunication assets and expect the transaction to close in the second quarter of 2021 after satisfying customary conditions to closing.
Note 3 – Receivables and Expected Credit Losses
Our portfolio of receivables is comprised of 2 portfolio segments: accounts receivable and EIP receivables.
Accounts Receivable Portfolio Segment
Our accounts receivable segment primarily consists of amounts currently due from customers, including service and leased device receivables, device insurance administrators, wholesale partners, third-party retail channels and other carriers.
We estimate expected credit losses associated with our accounts receivable portfolio using an aging schedule methodology that utilizes historical information and current conditions to develop expected credit losses by aging bucket, including for receivables that are not past due.
To determine the appropriate credit loss percentages by aging bucket, we consider a number of factors, including our overall historical credit losses, net of recoveries and timely payment experience as well as current collection trends such as write-off frequency and severity, credit quality of the customer base, and other qualitative factors such as macro-economic conditions, including the expected economic impacts of the Pandemic.
We consider the need to adjust our estimate of expected credit losses for reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions. To do so, we monitor professional forecasts of changes in real U.S. gross domestic product and forecasts of consumer credit behavior for comparable credit exposures. We also periodically evaluate other economic indicators such as unemployment rates to assess their level of correlation with our historical credit loss statistics.
EIP Receivables Portfolio Segment
Based upon customer credit profiles at the time of customer origination, we classify the EIP receivables segment into 2 customer classes of “Prime” and “Subprime.” Prime customer receivables are those with lower credit risk and Subprime customer receivables are those with higher credit risk. Customers may be required to make a down payment on their equipment purchases. In addition, certain customers within the Subprime category are required to pay an advance deposit.
To determine a customer’s credit profile, we use a proprietary credit scoring model that measures the credit quality of a customer using several factors, such as credit bureau information, consumer credit risk scores and service and device plan characteristics.
Installment loans acquired in the Merger are included in EIP receivables. We applied our proprietary credit scoring model to the customers acquired in the Merger with an outstanding EIP receivable balance. Based on tenure, consumer credit risk score and credit profile, these acquired customers were classified into our customer classes of Prime or Subprime. Our proprietary credit scoring model is applied to all EIP arrangements originated after the Merger close date.
The following table summarizes the EIP receivables, including imputed discounts and related allowance for credit losses:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| | | |
| | | |
EIP receivables, gross (1) | $ | 6,213 | | | $ | 4,582 | |
| Unamortized imputed discount | (325) | | | (299) | |
| | | |
| EIP receivables, net of unamortized imputed discount | 5,888 | | | 4,283 | |
Allowance for credit losses (2) | (280) | | | (100) | |
| | | |
| EIP receivables, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount | $ | 5,608 | | | $ | 4,183 | |
| Classified on the balance sheet as: | | | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount | $ | 3,577 | | | $ | 2,600 | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount | 2,031 | | | 1,583 | |
| | | |
| EIP receivables, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount | $ | 5,608 | | | $ | 4,183 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
(1) Through the Merger, we acquired EIP receivables with a fair value of $1.3 billion as of April 1, 2020. As they were recorded at fair value, an imputed discount was not recognized on the acquired receivables.
(2) Allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2020 was impacted by the cumulative effect of initially applying the new credit loss standard on our receivables portfolio on January 1, 2020, which resulted in an increase to our allowance for credit losses of $91 million.
We manage our EIP receivables portfolio using delinquency and customer credit class as key credit quality indicators. As a part of the adoption of the new credit loss standard, we now disclose our EIP receivables portfolio disaggregated by origination year. EIP receivables acquired through the Merger are also presented by origination year. The following table presents the
amortized cost of our EIP receivables by delinquency status, customer credit class, and year of origination as of December 31, 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Originated in 2020 | | Originated in 2019 | | Originated prior to 2019 | | Total EIP Receivables, net of
unamortized imputed discounts |
| (in millions) | Prime | | Subprime | | Prime | | Subprime | | Prime | | Subprime | | Prime | | Subprime | | Grand total |
| Current - 30 days past due | $ | 2,654 | | | $ | 2,035 | | | $ | 528 | | | $ | 407 | | | $ | 124 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 3,306 | | | $ | 2,468 | | | $ | 5,774 | |
| 31 - 60 days past due | 16 | | | 30 | | | 6 | | | 12 | | | 1 | | | 0 | | | 23 | | | 42 | | | 65 | |
| 61 - 90 days past due | 4 | | | 13 | | | 2 | | | 5 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 6 | | | 18 | | | 24 | |
| More than 90 days past due | 3 | | | 11 | | | 2 | | | 6 | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 6 | | | 19 | | | 25 | |
| EIP receivables, net of unamortized imputed discount | $ | 2,677 | | | $ | 2,089 | | | $ | 538 | | | $ | 430 | | | $ | 126 | | | $ | 28 | | | $ | 3,341 | | | $ | 2,547 | | | $ | 5,888 | |
We estimate expected credit losses on our EIP receivables by using historical data adjusted for current conditions to calculate default probabilities for our outstanding EIP loans. We consider various risk characteristics when calculating default probabilities, such as how long such loans have been outstanding, customer credit ratings, customer tenure, delinquency status and other correlated variables identified through statistical analyses. We multiply these estimated default probabilities by our estimated loss given default, which considers recoveries.
As we do for our accounts receivable portfolio segment, we consider the need to adjust our estimate of expected losses on EIP receivables for reasonable and supportable forecasts of economic conditions through monitoring of external professional forecasts and periodic internal statistical analyses, including the expected economic impacts of the Pandemic.
For EIP receivables acquired in the Merger, the difference between the fair value and unpaid principal balance of the loan at the
acquisition date is accreted to interest income over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method. EIP receivables had a combined weighted average effective interest rate of 6.7% and 8.8% as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Activity for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 in the allowance for credit losses and unamortized imputed discount balances for the accounts receivable and EIP receivables segments were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| (in millions) | Accounts Receivable Allowance | | EIP Receivables Allowance | | Total | Accounts Receivable Allowance | | EIP Receivables Allowance | | Total | | Accounts Receivable Allowance | | EIP Receivables Allowance | | Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, beginning of period | $ | 61 | | | $ | 399 | | | $ | 460 | | | $ | 67 | | | $ | 449 | | | $ | 516 | | | $ | 86 | | | $ | 396 | | | $ | 482 | |
| Beginning balance adjustment due to implementation of the new credit loss standard | 0 | | | 91 | | | 91 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bad debt expense | 338 | | | 264 | | | 602 | | | 77 | | | 230 | | | 307 | | | 69 | | | 228 | | | 297 | |
| Write-offs, net of recoveries | (205) | | | (175) | | | (380) | | | (83) | | | (249) | | | (332) | | | (88) | | | (240) | | | (328) | |
| Change in imputed discount on short-term and long-term EIP receivables | N/A | | 171 | | | 171 | | | N/A | | 136 | | | 136 | | | N/A | | 250 | | | 250 | |
| Impact on the imputed discount from sales of EIP receivables | N/A | | (145) | | | (145) | | | N/A | | (167) | | | (167) | | | N/A | | (185) | | | (185) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, end of period | $ | 194 | | | $ | 605 | | | $ | 799 | | | $ | 61 | | | $ | 399 | | | $ | 460 | | | $ | 67 | | | $ | 449 | | | $ | 516 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures
We do not have material, unmitigated off-balance-sheet credit exposures as of December 31, 2020. In connection with the sales of certain service and EIP accounts receivable pursuant to the sale arrangements, we have deferred purchase price is determinedassets
included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets measured at fair value that are based on a discounted cash flow model which uses primarilyusing unobservable inputs (LevelLevel 3 inputs),inputs, including customer default rates.rates and credit worthiness, dilutions and recoveries. See Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables for further information.
Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables
We have entered into transactions to sell certain service accounts receivable and EIP receivables. The transactions, including our continuing involvement with the sold receivables and the respective impacts to our consolidated financial statements, are described below.
In conjunction with the Merger, the total principal amount outstanding under Sprint’s accounts receivable facility of $2.3 billion was repaid on April 1, 2020, and the facility was terminated.
Sales of Service Accounts Receivable
Overview of the Transaction
In 2014, we entered into an arrangement to sell certain service accounts receivable on a revolving basis (the “service receivable sale arrangement”). The maximum funding commitment of the service receivable sale arrangement is $950 million, and the facility expires in March 2021. As of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, our deferred purchase price related2019, the service receivable sale arrangement provided funding of $772 million and $924 million, respectively. Sales of receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis. The receivables consist of service charges currently due from customers and are short-term in nature.
In connection with the service receivable sale arrangement, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary, which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity, to sell service accounts receivable (the “Service BRE”). The Service BRE does not qualify as a VIE, and due to the salessignificant level of control we exercise over the entity, it is consolidated. Pursuant to the service receivable sale arrangement, certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries transfer selected receivables to the Service BRE. The Service BRE then sells the receivables to an unaffiliated entity (the “Service VIE”), which was established to facilitate the sale of beneficial ownership interests in the receivables to certain third parties.
Variable Interest Entity
We determined that the Service VIE qualifies as a VIE as it lacks sufficient equity to finance its activities. We have a variable interest in the Service VIE but are not the primary beneficiary as we lack the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the Service VIE’s economic performance. Those activities include committing the Service VIE to legal agreements to purchase or sell assets, selecting which receivables are purchased in the service receivable sale arrangement, determining whether the Service VIE will sell interests in the purchased service receivables to other parties, funding of the entity and EIPservicing of receivables. We do not hold the power to direct the key decisions underlying these activities. For example, while we act as the servicer of the sold receivables, was $745 millionwhich is considered a significant activity of the Service VIE, we are acting as an agent in our capacity as the servicer, and $659 million, respectively.the counterparty to the service receivable sale arrangement has the ability to remove us as the servicing agent of the receivables at will with no recourse available to us. As we have determined we are not the primary beneficiary, the balances and results of the Service VIE are not included in our consolidated financial statements.
The following table summarizes the impactscarrying amounts and classification of the sale of certain service receivables and EIP receivables in our Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Derecognized net service receivables and EIP receivables | $ | 2,725 |
| | $ | 2,502 |
|
| Other current assets | 639 |
| | 578 |
|
| of which, deferred purchase price | 636 |
| | 576 |
|
| Other long-term assets | 109 |
| | 83 |
|
| of which, deferred purchase price | 109 |
| | 83 |
|
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 25 |
| | 17 |
|
| Other current liabilities | 180 |
| | 129 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | 3 |
| | 4 |
|
| Net cash proceeds since inception | 2,058 |
| | 2,030 |
|
| Of which: | | | |
| Change in net cash proceeds during the year-to-date period | 28 |
| | 536 |
|
| Net cash proceeds funded by reinvested collections | 2,030 |
| | 1,494 |
|
We recognized losses from sales of receivables of $299 million, $228 million and $204 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These losses from sales of receivables were recognized in Selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Losses from sales of receivables include adjustments to the receivables’ fair values and changes in fair valueassets, which consist primarily of the deferred purchase price.price, and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets that relate to our variable interest in the Service VIE:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| Other current assets | $ | 378 | | | $ | 350 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 0 | | | 25 | |
| Other current liabilities | 357 | | | 342 | |
Continuing Involvement
Sales of EIP Receivables
Pursuant
Overview of the Transaction
In 2015, we entered into an arrangement to the sale arrangements described above, we have continuing involvement with the service receivables andsell certain EIP receivables we sell as we service the receivables and are required to repurchase certain receivables, including ineligible receivables, aged receivables and receivables where write-off is imminent. We continue to service the customers and their related receivables, including facilitating customer payment collection, in exchange for a monthly servicing fee. As the receivables are soldaccounts receivable on a revolving basis (the “EIP sale arrangement”). The maximum funding commitment of the customer payment collections on sold receivables may be reinvested in new receivable sales. While servicingsale arrangement is $1.3 billion. In February 2020, we amended the receivables, we apply the same policies and procedures
sale arrangement to provide for an alternative advance rate methodology for the EIP accounts receivable sold in the sale arrangement and to make certain other administrative changes. On November 2, 2020, we extended the scheduled expiration date of the EIP sale arrangement to November 18, 2021.
On April 30, 2020, we agreed with the purchaser banks to update our collection policies to temporarily allow for flexibility for modifications to the accounts receivable sold that are impacted by COVID-19 and exclusion of such accounts receivable from all pool performance triggers.
As of both December 31, 2020 and 2019, the EIP sale arrangement provided funding of $1.3 billion. Sales of EIP receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis.
In connection with this EIP sale arrangement, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary, which qualifies as we apply to our owned receivables, and we continue to maintain normal relationships with our customers.a bankruptcy remote entity (the “EIP BRE”). Pursuant to the EIP sale arrangement, underour wholly owned subsidiary transfers selected receivables to the EIP BRE. The EIP BRE then sells the receivables to a non-consolidated and unaffiliated third-party entity over which we do not exercise any level of control, nor does the third-party entity qualify as a VIE.
Variable Interest Entity
We determined that the EIP BRE is a VIE as its equity investment at risk lacks the obligation to absorb a certain circumstances,portion of its expected losses. We have a variable interest in the EIP BRE and have determined that we are requiredthe primary beneficiary based on our ability to deposit cash or replacementdirect the activities which most significantly impact the EIP BRE’s economic performance. Those activities include selecting which receivables primarily for contracts terminated by customers underare transferred into the EIP BRE and sold in the EIP sale arrangement and funding of the EIP BRE. Additionally, our JUMP! Program.
In addition, we have continuing involvement withequity interest in the sold receivables as we mayEIP BRE obligates us to absorb losses and gives us the right to receive benefits from the EIP BRE that could potentially be responsible for absorbing additional credit losses pursuantsignificant to the sale arrangements. Our maximum exposure to loss related toEIP BRE. Accordingly, we include the involvement withbalances and results of operations of the service receivablesEIP BRE in our consolidated financial statements.
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and EIP receivables sold under the sale arrangements was $1.3 billion asclassification of December 31, 2017. The maximum exposure to loss,assets, which is a required disclosure under GAAP, represents an estimated loss that would be incurred under severe, hypothetical circumstances whereby we would not receiveconsist primarily of the deferred purchase price, portionand liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets of the contractual proceeds withheld byEIP BRE:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| Other current assets | $ | 388 | | | $ | 344 | |
| Other assets | 120 | | | 89 | |
| Other long-term liabilities | 4 | | | 18 | |
In addition, the purchasers and would alsoEIP BRE is a separate legal entity with its own separate creditors who will be requiredentitled, prior to repurchaseany liquidation of the maximum amount of receivables pursuant to the sale arrangements without consideration for any recovery. As we believe the probability of these circumstances occurring is remote, the maximum exposure to loss is not an indication of our expected loss.
Note 4 – Property and Equipment
The components of property and equipment were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Useful Lives | | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Buildings and equipment | Up to 40 years | | $ | 2,066 |
| | $ | 1,657 |
|
| Wireless communications systems | Up to 20 years | | 32,706 |
| | 29,272 |
|
| Leasehold improvements | Up to 12 years | | 1,182 |
| | 1,068 |
|
| Capitalized software | Up to 10 years | | 10,563 |
| | 8,488 |
|
| Leased wireless devices | Up to 18 months | | 1,209 |
| | 2,624 |
|
| Construction in progress | | | 1,771 |
| | 2,613 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (27,301 | ) | | (24,779 | ) |
| Property and equipment, net | | | $ | 22,196 |
| | $ | 20,943 |
|
Wireless communication systems include capital lease agreements for network equipment with varying expiration terms through 2031. Capital lease assets and accumulated amortization were $2.4 billion and $533 million, and $1.6 billion and $300 million, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
We capitalize interest associated with the acquisition or construction of certain property and equipment and spectrum intangible assets. We recognized capitalized interest of $136 million, $142 million and $230 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The components of leased wireless devices under our JUMP! On Demand program were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Leased wireless devices, gross | $ | 1,209 |
| | $ | 2,624 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation | (417 | ) | | (1,193 | ) |
| Leased wireless devices, net | $ | 792 |
| | $ | 1,431 |
|
Future minimum payments expectedEIP BRE, to be received oversatisfied prior to any value in the lease term relatedEIP BRE becoming available to us. Accordingly, the leased wireless devices, which exclude optional residual buy-out amounts at the endassets of the lease term, are summarized below:EIP BRE may not be used to settle our general obligations and creditors of the EIP BRE have limited recourse to our general credit.
|
| | | |
| (in millions) | Total |
| Year Ended December 31, | |
| 2018 | $ | 485 |
|
| 2019 | 104 |
|
| Total | $ | 589 |
|
Total depreciation expense relating to property and equipment was $5.8 billion, $6.0 billion and $4.4 billion for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Included in the total depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $1.0 billion, $1.5 billion and $312 million, respectively, related to leased wireless devices.
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we recorded additional depreciation expense of $63 million, $101 million and $85 million, respectively, as a result of adjustments to useful lives of network equipment expected to be replaced in connection with our network transformation and decommissioning the MetroPCS CDMA network and redundant network cell sites.
Asset retirement obligations are primarily for certain legal obligations to remediate leased property on which our network infrastructure and administrative assets are located.
Activity in our asset retirement obligations was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Asset retirement obligations, beginning of year | $ | 539 |
| | $ | 483 |
|
| Liabilities incurred | 25 |
| | 50 |
|
| Liabilities settled | (16 | ) | | (67 | ) |
| Accretion expense | 27 |
| | 24 |
|
| Changes in estimated cash flows | (13 | ) | | 49 |
|
| Asset retirement obligations, end of year | $ | 562 |
| | $ | 539 |
|
| | | | |
| Classified on the balance sheet as: | | | |
| Other current liabilities | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 16 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | 559 |
| | 523 |
|
| Asset retirement obligations | $ | 562 |
| | $ | 539 |
|
The corresponding assets, net of accumulated depreciation, related to asset retirement obligations were $220 million and $258 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Note 5 – Goodwill, Spectrum Licenses and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
There were no changes in carrying values of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Spectrum LicensesDeferred Purchase Price Assets
In connection with the sales of certain service and EIP accounts receivable pursuant to the sale arrangements, we have deferred purchase price assets measured at fair value that are based on a discounted cash flow model using unobservable Level 3 inputs, including estimated customer default rates and credit worthiness. See Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables for further information.
Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets include assets that do not have indefinite lives, such as property and equipment and other intangible assets. Substantially all of our long-lived assets are located in the U.S., including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. We assess potential impairments to our long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If any indicators of impairment are present, we test recoverability. The following table summarizescarrying value of a long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset group. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the asset or asset group’s carrying amount, then an impairment loss is recorded, measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or asset group exceeds its fair value.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of buildings and equipment, wireless communications systems, leasehold improvements, capitalized software, leased wireless devices and construction in progress. Buildings and equipment include certain network server equipment. Wireless communications systems include assets to operate our spectrum license activitywireless network and IT data centers, including tower assets and leasehold improvements and assets related to the liability for the years ended December 31, 2017retirement of long-lived assets. Leasehold improvements include asset improvements other than those related to the wireless network.
Property and 2016:equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairments, if any, in Property and equipment, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We generally depreciate property and equipment over the period the property and equipment provide economic benefit using the straight-line method. Depreciable life studies are performed periodically to confirm the appropriateness of depreciable lives for certain categories of property and equipment. These studies take into account actual usage, physical wear and tear, replacement history and assumptions about technology evolution. When these factors indicate the useful life of an asset is different from the previous assessment, the remaining book value is depreciated prospectively over the adjusted remaining estimated useful life. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the related lease term.
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| Spectrum licenses, beginning of year | $ | 27,014 |
| | $ | 23,955 |
|
| Spectrum license acquisitions | 8,599 |
| | 3,334 |
|
| Spectrum licenses transferred to held for sale | (271 | ) | | (324 | ) |
| Costs to clear spectrum | 24 |
| | 49 |
|
| Spectrum licenses, end of year | $ | 35,366 |
| | $ | 27,014 |
|
We had the following spectrum license transactions during 2017:
In March 2017, we closed onrecord an agreement with a third partyasset retirement obligation for the exchange of certain AWS and PCS spectrum licenses. Upon closing of the transaction, we recorded the spectrum licenses received at their estimated fair value of approximately $123 millionlegal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related asset in the period in which the obligation is incurred. In periods subsequent to initial measurement, we recognize changes in the liability resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or the amount of the original estimate. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset. Our obligations relate primarily
to certain legal obligations to remediate leased property on which our network infrastructure and administrative assets are located.
We capitalize certain costs incurred in connection with developing or acquiring internal use software. Capitalization of software costs commences once the final selection of the specific software solution has been made and management authorizes and commits to funding the software project and ceases once the project is ready for its intended use. Capitalized software costs are included in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as maintenance and training costs, are expensed as incurred.
Device Leases
Through the Merger, we acquired device lease contracts in which Sprint is the lessor (the “Sprint Flex Lease Program”), substantially all of which are classified as operating leases, as well as the associated fixed assets (i.e., the leased devices). These leased devices were recorded as fixed assets at their acquisition date fair value and presented within Property and equipment, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Our leasing programs (“Leasing Programs”), which include JUMP! On Demand and the Sprint Flex Lease Program acquired through the Merger, allow customers to lease a device (handset or tablet) over a period of, generally, 18 months and upgrade it for a new device when eligibility requirements are met. We depreciate leased devices to their estimated residual value, on a group basis, using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the device. The estimated useful life reflects the period for which we estimate the group of leased devices will provide utility to us, which may be longer than the initial lease term based on customer options in the Sprint Flex Lease program to renew the lease on a month-to-month basis after the initial lease term concludes. In determining the estimated useful life, we consider the lease term (e.g., 18 months and month-to-month renewal options for the Sprint Flex Lease Program), trade-in activity and write-offs for lost and stolen devices. Lost and stolen devices are incorporated into the estimates of depreciation expense and recognized as an adjustment to accumulated depreciation when the loss event occurs. Our policy of using the group method of depreciation has been applied to acquired leased devices as well as leases originated subsequent to the Merger. Acquired leased devices are grouped based on the age of the device. Revenues associated with the leased wireless devices, net of lease incentives, are generally recognized on a gainstraight-line basis over the lease term.
For arrangements in which we are the lessor of $37 million includedwireless devices, we separate lease and non-lease components.
Upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers in Gainsthe JUMP! On Demand lease program must return or purchase their device, and customers in the Sprint Flex Lease Program have the option to return or purchase their device or to renew their lease on disposala month-to-month basis. The purchase price of spectrum licensesthe device is established at lease commencement and is based on the type of device leased and any down payment made. The Leasing Programs do not contain any residual value guarantees or variable lease payments, and there are no restrictions or covenants imposed by these leases. Returned devices, including those received upon device upgrade, are transferred from Property and equipment, net to Inventory on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with any write-down recognized as Cost of equipment sales in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
| |
• | In April 2017, the FCC announced that we were the winning bidder of 1,525 licenses in the 600 MHz spectrum auction for an aggregate price of $8.0 billion. At inception of the auction in June 2016, we deposited $2.2 billion with the FCC which, based on the outcome of the auction, was sufficient to cover our down payment obligation due in April 2017. In May 2017, we paid the FCC the remaining $5.8 billion of the purchase price using cash reserves and by issuing debt to Deutsche Telekom AG (“DT”), our majority stockholder, pursuant to existing purchase commitments. See Note 7 - Debt for further information. The licenses are included in Spectrum licenses as of December 31, 2017, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We began deployment of these licenses on our network in the third quarter of 2017. |
In September 2017, we closed on an agreement with a third party for the exchange of certain AWS and PCS spectrum licenses. Upon closing of the transaction, we recorded the spectrum licenses received at their estimated fair value of
approximately $115 million and recognized a gain of $29 million included in Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
In September 2017, we entered into a Unit Purchase Agreement (“UPA”) to acquire the remaining equity in Iowa Wireless Services, LLC (“IWS”), a 54% owned unconsolidated subsidiary, for a purchase price of $25 million. On January 1, 2018, we closed on the purchase agreement and received the IWS spectrum licenses, among other assets. As of December 31, 2017, we accounted for our existing investment in IWS under the equity method as we had significant influence, but not control.
In December 2017, we closed on an agreement with a third party for the exchange of certain AWS and PCS spectrum licenses. Upon closing of the transaction, we recorded the spectrum licenses received at their estimated fair value of approximately $352 million and recognized a gain of $168 million included in Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
We had the following spectrum license transactions during 2016:
We closed on an agreement with AT&T Inc. for the acquisition and exchange of certain spectrum licenses. Upon closing of the transaction during the first quarter of 2016, we recorded the spectrum licenses received at their estimated fair value of approximately $1.2 billion and recognized a gain of $636 million included in Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
We closed on agreements with multiple third parties for the purchase and exchange of certain spectrum licenses for $1.3 billion in cash. Upon closing of the transactions, we recorded spectrum licenses received at their estimated fair values totaling approximately $1.7 billion and recognized gains of $199 million included in Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
We closed on an agreement with a third party for the purchase of certain spectrum licenses covering approximately 11 million people for approximately $420 million during the fourth quarter of 2016.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Impairment Assessments
Our impairment assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets (spectrum licenses) resulted in no impairment as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Other Intangible Assets
Intangible assets that do not have indefinite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Customer lists and the Sprint trade name are amortized using the sum-of-the-years digits method over the period in which the asset is expected to contribute to future cash flows. The components of Otherremaining finite-lived intangible assets were as follows:are amortized using the straight-line method.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Useful Lives | | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| (in millions) | | Gross Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Amount | | Gross Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Amount |
| Customer lists | Up to 6 years | | $ | 1,104 |
| | $ | (1,016 | ) | | $ | 88 |
| | $ | 1,104 |
| | $ | (894 | ) | | $ | 210 |
|
| Trademarks and patents | Up to 19 years | | 307 |
| | (192 | ) | | 115 |
| | 303 |
| | (156 | ) | | 147 |
|
| Other | Up to 28 years | | 49 |
| | (35 | ) | | 14 |
| | 50 |
| | (31 | ) | | 19 |
|
| Other intangible assets | | | $ | 1,460 |
| | $ | (1,243 | ) | | $ | 217 |
| | $ | 1,457 |
| | $ | (1,081 | ) | | $ | 376 |
|
Amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization was $163 million, $220 million and $276 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.Goodwill
The estimated aggregate future amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization are summarized below:
|
| | | |
| (in millions) | Estimated Future Amortization |
| Year Ending December 31, | |
| 2018 | $ | 105 |
|
| 2019 | 52 |
|
| 2020 | 35 |
|
| 2021 | 14 |
|
| 2022 | 4 |
|
| Thereafter | 7 |
|
| Total | $ | 217 |
|
Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments
Embedded Derivative Instruments
In connection with the business combination with MetroPCS, we issued senior reset notes to Deutsche Telekom. The interest rates were adjusted at the reset dates to rates defined in the applicable supplemental indentures to manage interest rate risk related to the senior reset notes. We determined certain componentsGoodwill consists of the reset feature are required to be bifurcated fromexcess of the senior reset notes and separately accounted for as embedded derivative instruments. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no embedded derivatives subject to interest rate volatility related to the Senior Reset Notes to affiliates.
The fair value of our embedded derivatives was determined using a lattice-based valuation model by determiningpurchase price over the fair value of the senior reset notes withidentifiable net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is allocated to our 2 reporting units, wireless and without the embedded derivatives included. The fair value of the senior reset notes with the embedded derivatives utilizes the contractual term of each senior reset note, reset rates calculated based on the spread between specified yield curves and the yield curve on certain T-Mobile long-term debt adjusted pursuantLayer3.
The fair value of embedded derivative instruments by balance sheet location and level were as follows:
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2017 |
| (in millions) | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| Other long-term liabilities | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 66 |
| | $ | 66 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2016 |
| (in millions) | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| Other long-term liabilities | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 118 |
| | $ | 118 |
|
The following table summarizes the gain (loss) activity related to embedded derivatives instruments recognized in Interest expense to affiliates:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Embedded derivatives | $ | 52 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | (148 | ) |
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The carrying amounts and fair values of our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level within the Fair Value Hierarchy | | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| (in millions) | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | |
| Deferred purchase price assets | 3 | | $ | 745 |
| | $ | 745 |
| | $ | 659 |
| | $ | 659 |
|
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
| Guarantee liabilities | 3 | | 105 |
| | 105 |
| | 135 |
| | 135 |
|
The principal amounts and fair values of our short-term and long-term debt included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level within the Fair Value Hierarchy | | December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| (in millions) | | Principal Amount | | Fair Value | | Principal Amount | | Fair Value |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
| Senior Notes to third parties | 1 | | $ | 11,850 |
| | $ | 12,540 |
| | $ | 18,600 |
| | $ | 19,584 |
|
| Senior Notes to affiliates | 2 | | 7,500 |
| | 7,852 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Incremental Term Loan Facility to affiliates | 2 | | 4,000 |
| | 4,020 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Senior Reset Notes to affiliates | 2 | | 3,100 |
| | 3,260 |
| | 5,600 |
| | 5,955 |
|
| Senior Secured Term Loans | 2 | | — |
| | — |
| | 1,980 |
| | 2,005 |
|
Long-term Debt
The fair value of our Senior Notes to third parties was determined based on quoted market prices in active markets, and therefore was classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of the Senior Notes to affiliates, Incremental Term Loan Facility to affiliates, Senior Reset Notes to affiliates and Senior Secured Term Loans were determined based on a discounted cash flow approach using quoted prices of instruments with similar terms and maturities and an estimate for our standalone credit risk. Accordingly, our Senior Notes to affiliates, Incremental Term Loan Facility to affiliates, Senior Reset Notes to affiliates and Senior Secured Term Loans were classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Although we have determined the estimated fair values using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies, considerable judgment was required in interpreting market data to develop fair value estimates for the Senior Notes to affiliates, Incremental Term Loan Facility to affiliates, Senior Reset Notes to affiliates and Senior Secured Term Loans to affiliates. The fair value estimates were based on information available as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. As such, our estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amount we could realize in a current market exchange.
Deferred Purchase Price Assets
In connection with the sales of certain service and EIP accounts receivable pursuant to the sale arrangements, we have deferred purchase price assets measured at fair value that are based on a discounted cash flow model using unobservable Level 3 inputs, including estimated customer default rates and credit worthiness. See Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables for further information.
Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets include assets that do not have indefinite lives, such as property and equipment and other intangible assets. Substantially all of our long-lived assets are located in the U.S., including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. We assess potential impairments to our long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If any indicators of impairment are present, we test recoverability. The carrying value of a long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset group. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the asset or asset group’s carrying amount, then an impairment loss is recorded, measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or asset group exceeds its fair value.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of buildings and equipment, wireless communications systems, leasehold improvements, capitalized software, leased wireless devices and construction in progress. Buildings and equipment include certain network server equipment. Wireless communications systems include assets to operate our wireless network and IT data centers, including tower assets and leasehold improvements and assets related to the liability for the retirement of long-lived assets. Leasehold improvements include asset improvements other than those related to the wireless network.
Property and equipment are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairments, if any, in Property and equipment, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We generally depreciate property and equipment over the period the property and equipment provide economic benefit using the straight-line method. Depreciable life studies are performed periodically to confirm the appropriateness of depreciable lives for certain categories of property and equipment. These studies take into account actual usage, physical wear and tear, replacement history and assumptions about technology evolution. When these factors indicate the useful life of an asset is different from the previous assessment, the remaining book value is depreciated prospectively over the adjusted remaining estimated useful life. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the related lease term.
Costs of major replacements and improvements are capitalized. Repair and maintenance expenditures which do not enhance or extend the asset’s useful life are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Construction costs, labor and overhead incurred in the expansion or enhancement of our wireless network are capitalized. Capitalization commences with pre-construction period administrative and technical activities, which include obtaining zoning approvals and building permits, and ceases at the point at which the asset is ready for its intended use. We capitalize interest associated with the acquisition or construction of certain property and equipment. Capitalized interest is reported as a reduction in interest expense and depreciated over the useful life of the related assets.
We record an asset retirement obligation for the estimated fair value of legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related asset in the period in which the obligation is incurred. In periods subsequent to initial measurement, we recognize changes in the liability resulting from the passage of time and revisions to either the timing or the amount of the original estimate. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset. Our obligations relate primarily
to certain legal obligations to remediate leased property on which our network infrastructure and administrative assets are located.
We capitalize certain costs incurred in connection with developing or acquiring internal use software. Capitalization of software costs commences once the final selection of the specific software solution has been made and management authorizes and commits to funding the software project and ceases once the project is ready for its intended use. Capitalized software costs are included in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as maintenance and training costs, are expensed as incurred.
Device Leases
Through the Merger, we acquired device lease contracts in which Sprint is the lessor (the “Sprint Flex Lease Program”), substantially all of which are classified as operating leases, as well as the associated fixed assets (i.e., the leased devices). These leased devices were recorded as fixed assets at their acquisition date fair value and presented within Property and equipment, net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Our leasing programs (“Leasing Programs”), which include JUMP! On Demand and the Sprint Flex Lease Program acquired through the Merger, allow customers to lease a device (handset or tablet) over a period of, generally, 18 months and upgrade it for a new device when eligibility requirements are met. We depreciate leased devices to their estimated residual value, on a group basis, using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the device. The estimated useful life reflects the period for which we estimate the group of leased devices will provide utility to us, which may be longer than the initial lease term based on customer options in the Sprint Flex Lease program to renew the lease on a month-to-month basis after the initial lease term concludes. In determining the estimated useful life, we consider the lease term (e.g., 18 months and month-to-month renewal options for the Sprint Flex Lease Program), trade-in activity and write-offs for lost and stolen devices. Lost and stolen devices are incorporated into the estimates of depreciation expense and recognized as an adjustment to accumulated depreciation when the loss event occurs. Our policy of using the group method of depreciation has been applied to acquired leased devices as well as leases originated subsequent to the Merger. Acquired leased devices are grouped based on the age of the device. Revenues associated with the leased wireless devices, net of lease incentives, are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
For arrangements in which we are the lessor of wireless devices, we separate lease and non-lease components.
Upon device upgrade or at lease end, customers in the JUMP! On Demand lease program must return or purchase their device, and customers in the Sprint Flex Lease Program have the option to return or purchase their device or to renew their lease on a month-to-month basis. The purchase price of the device is established at lease commencement and is based on the type of device leased and any down payment made. The Leasing Programs do not contain any residual value guarantees or variable lease payments, and there are no restrictions or covenants imposed by these leases. Returned devices, including those received upon device upgrade, are transferred from Property and equipment, net to Inventory on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with any write-down recognized as Cost of equipment sales in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Other Intangible Assets
Intangible assets that do not have indefinite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Customer lists and the Sprint trade name are amortized using the sum-of-the-years digits method over the period in which the asset is expected to contribute to future cash flows. The remaining finite-lived intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill
Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is allocated to our 2 reporting units, wireless and Layer3.
Spectrum Licenses
Spectrum licenses are carried at costs incurred to acquire the spectrum licenses and the costs to prepare the spectrum licenses for their intended use, such as costs to clear acquired spectrum licenses. The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issues spectrum licenses which provide us with the exclusive right to utilize designated radio frequency spectrum within specific geographic service areas to provide wireless communications services. While spectrum licenses are issued for a fixed period of time, typically for up to 15 years, the FCC has granted license renewals routinely and at a nominal cost. The spectrum licenses held by us expire at various dates. We believe we will be able to meet all requirements necessary to secure renewal of our spectrum licenses at nominal costs. Moreover, we determined there are currently no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors that limit the useful lives of our spectrum licenses. Therefore, we determined the spectrum licenses should be treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets.
At times, we enter into agreements to sell or exchange spectrum licenses. Upon entering into the arrangement, if the transaction has been deemed to have commercial substance, spectrum licenses are reviewed for impairment. The licenses are transferred at their carrying value, as adjusted for any impairment recognized, to assets held for sale, which is included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets until approval and completion of the exchange or sale. Upon closing of the transaction, spectrum licenses acquired as part of an exchange of nonmonetary assets are recorded at fair value and the difference between the fair value of the spectrum licenses obtained, carrying value of the spectrum licenses transferred and cash paid, if any, is recognized as a Gain (loss) on disposal of spectrum licenses included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Our fair value estimates of spectrum licenses are based on information for which there is little or no observable market data. If the transaction lacks commercial substance or the fair value is not measurable, the acquired spectrum licenses are recorded at our carrying value of the spectrum assets transferred or exchanged.
Spectrum Leases
Through the Merger, the Company acquired lease agreements (the “Agreements”) with various educational and non-profit institutions that provide us with the right to use FCC spectrum licenses (Educational Broadband Services or “EBS spectrum”) in the 2.5 GHz band. In addition to the Agreements with educational institutions and private owners who hold the licenses, the Company also acquired direct ownership of spectrum licenses previously acquired by Sprint through government auctions or other acquisitions.
The Agreements with educational and certain non-profit institutions are typically for five to 10 years with automatic renewal provisions, bringing the total term of the agreement up to 30 years. A majority of the Agreements include a right of first refusal to acquire, lease or otherwise use the license at the end of the automatic renewal periods.
Leased FCC spectrum licenses are recorded as executory contracts whereby, as a result of business combination accounting, an intangible asset or liability is recorded reflecting the extent to which contractual terms are favorable or unfavorable to current market rates. These intangible assets or liabilities are amortized over the estimated remaining useful life of the lease agreements. Contractual lease payments are recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the arrangement, including renewals, and are presented in Costs of services within our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
The Agreements enhance the overall value of the Company’s owned spectrum licenses as the collective value is higher than the value of individual bands of spectrum within a specific geography. This value is derived from the ability to provide wireless service to customers across large geographic areas and maintain the same or similar wireless connectivity quality. This enhanced value from combining owned and leased spectrum licenses is referred to as an aggregation premium.
The aggregation premium is a component of the overall fair value of our owned FCC spectrum licenses, which are recorded as indefinite-lived intangible assets.
Impairment
We assess the carrying value of our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as our spectrum licenses, for potential impairment annually as of December 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate such assets might be impaired.
When assessing goodwill for impairment, we may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. If we do not perform a qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the 2 reporting units, wireless and Layer3, is less than its carrying amount, we perform a quantitative test. We recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying
amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized would not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
We test our spectrum licenses for impairment on an aggregate basis, consistent with our management of the overall business at a national level. We may elect to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If we do not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the qualitative assessment indicates it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, we calculate the estimated fair value of the intangible asset. If the estimated fair value of the spectrum licenses is lower than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. We estimate fair value using the Greenfield methodology, which is an income approach based on discounted cash flows associated with the intangible asset, to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions.
Restricted Cash
Certain provisions of our debt agreements require us to maintain specified cash collateral balances. Amounts associated with these balances are considered to be restricted cash and are included within Other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Guarantee Liabilities
We offer a device trade-in program, Just Upgrade My Phone (“JUMP!”), which provides eligible customers a specified-price trade-in right to upgrade their device. Upon enrollment, participating customers must finance the purchase of a device on an EIP and have a qualifying T-Mobile monthly wireless service plan. Upon a qualifying JUMP! program upgrade, the customer’s remaining EIP balance is settled provided they trade-in their eligible used device in good working condition and purchase a new device from us on a new EIP.
For customers who enroll in JUMP!, we recognize a liability and reduce revenue for the portion of revenue which represents the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee. The guarantee liability is valued based on various economic and customer behavioral assumptions, which requires judgment, including estimating the customer's remaining EIP balance at trade-in, the expected fair value of the used device at trade-in, and the probability and timing of trade-in. When customers upgrade their device, the difference between the EIP balance credit to the customer and the fair value of the returned device is recorded against the guarantee liabilities. All assumptions are reviewed periodically.
Fair Value Measurements
We carry certain assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The three-tier hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value, which prioritizes the inputs based on the observability as of the measurement date, is as follows:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 Observable inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; and
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require us to develop assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the placement of assets and liabilities being measured within the fair value hierarchy.
The carrying values of Cash and cash equivalents, Accounts receivable, Accounts receivable from affiliates, Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and borrowings under our vendor financing arrangements approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The carrying values of EIP receivables approximate fair value as the receivables are recorded at their present value using an imputed interest rate. With the exception of certain long-term fixed-rate debt, there were no financial instruments with a carrying value materially different from their fair value. See Note 7 - Fair Value Measurements for a comparison of the carrying values and fair values of our short-term and long-term debt.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities and are measured at fair value. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges associated with forecasted debt issuances, changes in fair value are reported as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss until reclassified into Interest expense in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings, generally over the life of the related debt. Unrealized gains on derivatives designated in qualifying cash flow hedge relationships are recorded at fair value as assets, and unrealized losses are recorded at fair value as liabilities.
Revenue Recognition (Effective January 1, 2018)
We primarily generate our revenue from providing wireless services to customers and selling or leasing devices and accessories. Our contracts with customers may involve multiple performance obligations, which include wireless services, wireless devices or a combination thereof, and we allocate the transaction price between each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price.
Significant Judgments
The most significant judgments affecting the amount and timing of revenue from contracts with our customers include the following items:
•Revenue for service contracts that we assess are not probable of collection is not recognized until the contract is completed or terminated and cash is received. Collectibility is re-assessed when there is a significant change in facts or circumstances. Our assessment of collectibility considers whether we may limit our exposure to credit risk through our right to stop transferring additional service in the event the customer is delinquent as well as certain contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses” above, for additional discussion on how we assess credit risk.
•Promotional EIP bill credits offered to a customer on an equipment sale that are paid over time and are contingent on the customer maintaining a service contract may result in an extended service contract based on whether a substantive penalty is deemed to exist. Determining whether contingent EIP bill credits result in a substantive termination penalty may require significant judgment.
•The identification of distinct performance obligations within our service plans may require significant judgment.
•Revenue is recorded net of costs paid to another party for performance obligations where we arrange for the other party to transfer goods or services to the customer (i.e., when we are acting as an agent). For example, performance obligations relating to services provided by third-party content providers where we neither control a right to the content provider’s service nor control the underlying service itself are presented net because we are acting as an agent. The determination of whether we control the underlying service or right to the service prior to our transfer to the customer requires, at times, significant judgment.
•Our products are generally sold with a right of return, which is accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize. Device return levels are estimated based on the expected value method as there are a large number of contracts with similar characteristics and the outcome of each contract is independent of the others. Historical return rate experience is a significant input to our expected value methodology.
•Sales of equipment to indirect dealers who have been identified as our customer (referred to as the sell-in model) often include credits subsequently paid to the dealer as a reimbursement for any discount promotions offered to the end consumer. These credits (payments to a customer, the dealer) are accounted for as variable consideration when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize from the sales of equipment to indirect dealers and are estimated based on historical experience and other factors, such as expected promotional activity.
•The determination of the standalone selling price for contracts that involve more than one performance obligation may require significant judgment, such as when the selling price of a good or service is not readily observable.
Wireless Services Revenue
We generate our wireless services revenues from providing access to, and usage of, our wireless communications network. Service revenues also include revenues earned for providing premium services to customers, such as device insurance services. Service contracts are billed monthly either in advance or arrears, or are prepaid. Generally, service revenue is recognized as we
satisfy our performance obligation to transfer service to our customers. We typically satisfy our stand-ready performance obligations, including unlimited wireless services, evenly over the contract term. For usage-based and prepaid wireless services, we satisfy our performance obligations when services are rendered.
Consideration payable to a customer is treated as a reduction of the total transaction price, unless the payment is in exchange for a distinct good or service, such as certain commissions paid to dealers, in which case the payment is treated as a purchase of that distinct good or service.
Federal Universal Service Fund (“USF”) and other fees are assessed by various governmental authorities in connection with the services we provide to our customers and are included in Cost of services. When we separately bill and collect these regulatory fees from customers, they are recorded gross in Total service revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we recorded approximately $267 million, $93 million and $161 million, respectively, of USF fees on a gross basis.
We have made an accounting policy election to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and collected by us from a customer (e.g., sales, use, value added, and some excise taxes).
Wireline Revenue
Performance obligations related to our Wireline customers include the provision of domestic and international data communications services, generally to complement business wireless customers. Wireline revenues are included within Roaming and other service revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Equipment Revenues
We generate equipment revenues from the sale or lease of mobile communication devices and accessories. For performance obligations related to equipment contracts, we typically transfer control at a point in time when the device or accessory is delivered to, and accepted by, the customer or dealer. We have elected to account for shipping and handling activities that occur after control of the related good transfers as fulfillment activities instead of assessing such activities as performance obligations. We estimate variable consideration (e.g., device returns or certain payments to indirect dealers) primarily based on historical experience. Equipment sales not probable of collection are generally recorded as payments are received. Our assessment of collectibility considers contract terms such as down payments that reduce our exposure to credit risk.
We offer certain customers the option to pay for devices and accessories in installments using an EIP. Generally, we recognize as a reduction of the total transaction price the effects of a financing component in contracts where customers purchase their devices and accessories on an EIP with a term of more than one year, including those financing components that are not considered to be significant to the contract. However, we have elected the practical expedient to not recognize the effects of a significant financing component for contracts where we expect, at contract inception, that the period between the transfer of a performance obligation to a customer and the customer’s payment for that performance obligation will be one year or less.
In addition, for customers who enroll in our JUMP! program, we recognize a liability based on the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee. The fair value of the guarantee is deducted from the transaction price and the remaining transaction price is allocated to other elements of the contract, including service and equipment performance obligations. See “Guarantee Liabilities” above for further information.
JUMP! On Demand allows customers to lease a device over a period of up to 18 months and upgrade it for a new device up to one time per month. To date, substantially all of our leased wireless devices are accounted for as operating leases and estimated contract consideration is allocated between lease and non-lease elements (such as service and equipment performance obligations) based on the relative standalone selling price of each performance obligation in the contract. Lease revenues are recorded as equipment revenues and recognized as earned on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Lease revenues on contracts not probable of collection are limited to the amount of payments received. See “Property and Equipment” above for further information.
Advertising and Search Revenues
Effective April 1, 2020, certain of our advertising and search revenues are now presented within Roaming and other service revenues, resulting in a reclassification of $506 million and $449 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively. These revenues were previously presented within Other revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
Imputed Interest on EIP Receivables
We record the effects of financing on all EIP loans regardless of whether or not the financing is considered to be significant. The imputation of interest results in a discount of the EIP receivable, thereby adjusting the transaction price of the contract with the customer, which is then allocated to the performance obligations of the arrangement.
For transactions where we recognize a significant financing component, judgment is required to determine the discount rate. For EIP sales, the discount rate used to adjust the transaction price primarily reflects current market interest rates and the estimated credit risk of the customer. Customer credit behavior is inherently uncertain. See “Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses” above, for additional discussion on how we assess credit risk.
For indirect channel loans to the end service customer in which the sale of the device was to the dealer (sell-in basis), the effect of imputing interest is recognized as a reduction to service revenue, the only performance obligation with the service customer as the device sale was recognized when transferred to the dealer, over the service contract period.
Our policies for imputed interest on EIP receivables are applied to loans originated for Sprint and Boost (up to the sale of the Prepaid Business to DISH on July 1, 2020) customers subsequent to Merger close.
Contract Balances
Generally, our devices and service plans are available at standard prices, which are maintained on price lists and published on our website and/or within our retail stores.
For contracts that involve more than one product or service that are identified as separate performance obligations, the transaction price is allocated to the performance obligations based on their relative standalone selling prices. The standalone selling price is the price at which we would sell the good or service separately to a customer and is most commonly evidenced by the price at which we sell that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers.
A contract asset is recorded when revenue is recognized in advance of our right to receive consideration (i.e., we must perform additional services in order to receive consideration). Amounts are recorded as receivables when our right to consideration is unconditional. When consideration is received, or we have an unconditional right to consideration in advance of delivery of goods or services, a contract liability is recorded. The transaction price can include non-refundable upfront fees, which are allocated to the identifiable performance obligations.
Contract assets are included in Other current assets and Other assets and contract liabilities are included in Deferred revenue in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Contract Modifications
Our service contracts allow customers to frequently modify their contracts without incurring penalties, in many cases. Each time a contract is modified, we evaluate the change in scope or price of the contract to determine if the modification should be treated as a separate contract, as if there is a termination of the existing contract and creation of a new contract, or if the modification should be considered a change associated with the existing contract. We typically do not have significant impacts from contract modifications.
Contract Costs
We incur certain incremental costs to obtain a contract that we expect to recover, such as sales commissions. We record an asset when these incremental costs to obtain a contract are incurred and amortize them on a systematic basis that is consistent with the transfer to the customer of the goods or services to which the asset relates.
We capitalize postpaid sales commissions for service activation as costs to acquire a contract and amortize them over the estimated period of benefit, currently 24 months. For capitalized contract costs, determining the amortization period over which such costs are recognized as well as assessing the indicators of impairment may require significant judgment. Prepaid commissions are expensed as incurred as their estimated period of benefit does not extend beyond 12 months. Commissions
paid upon device upgrade are not capitalized if the remaining customer contract is less than one year. Commissions paid when the customer has a lease are treated as initial direct costs and recognized over the lease term.
Our policies for the capitalization and amortization of costs to acquire a contract are applied to the Sprint, Boost (up to the sale of the Prepaid Business to Dish on July 1, 2020) and Assurance Wireless brands subsequent to the Merger close.
Incremental costs to obtain equipment contracts (e.g., commissions paid on device and accessory sales) are recognized when the equipment is transferred to the customer.
Brightstar Distribution
We had arrangements with Brightstar US, Inc. (“Brightstar”), a subsidiary of SoftBank, whereby Brightstar provided supply chain and inventory management services to us in our indirect channels. T-Mobile sold devices through Brightstar to T-Mobile indirect channels who then sold the device to an end customer.
The supply chain and inventory management arrangement included, among other things, that Brightstar may purchase inventory from the original equipment manufacturers to sell through to our indirect channels. As compensation for these services, we remitted per unit fees to Brightstar for each device sold to these indirect dealers.
Devices sold from T-Mobile to Brightstar do not meet the criteria for a sale. Devices transferred from T-Mobile to Brightstar remain in inventory until control is transferred upon the sale of the device to the end customer, and in some circumstances to the indirect dealer.
For customers who choose to lease a device previously sold to the indirect dealer, T-Mobile will repurchase the device from the indirect dealer and originate a lease directly with the end customer. Repurchase activity from the indirect dealer is estimated and treated as a right of return, reducing equipment revenue at the time of sale to the indirect dealer. Upon lease to the end customer, T-Mobile recognizes lease revenue over the associated lease term within Equipment revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
By December 31, 2020, we had terminated or restructured most of our arrangements with Brightstar, except for reverse logistics and trade-in services.
Leases (effective January 1, 2019)
Cell Site, Retail Store and Office Facility Leases
We are a lessee for non-cancelable operating and financing leases for cell sites, switch sites, retail stores, network equipment and office facilities with contractual terms that generally extend through 2035. Additionally, we lease dark fiber through non-cancelable operating leases with contractual terms that generally extend through 2041. The majority of cell site leases have a non-cancelable term of five to 15 years with several renewal options that can extend the lease term from five to 35 years. Some of these leases have escalating rentals during the initial lease term and during subsequent optional renewal periods. We recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for operating leases based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. The right-of-use asset for an operating lease is based on the lease liability. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable lease term and renewal periods that are considered reasonably certain.
In addition, we have financing leases for certain network equipment that generally have a non-cancelable lease term of two to five years. The financing leases do not have renewal options and contain a bargain purchase option at the end of the lease. We recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for financing leases based on the net present value of future minimum lease payments. The right-of-use asset for a finance lease is based on the lease liability. Lease expense for our financing leases is comprised of the amortization of the right-of-use asset and interest expense recognized based on the effective interest method.
We consider several factors in assessing whether renewal periods are reasonably certain of being exercised, including the continued maturation of our nationwide network, technological advances within the telecommunications industry and the availability of alternative sites. We have concluded it is not reasonably certain that we would exercise the options to extend or terminate our leases. Therefore, as of the lease commencement date, our lease terms generally do not include these options. We include options to extend or terminate a lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option.
In determining the discount rate used to measure the right-of-use asset and lease liability, we use rates implicit in the lease, or if not readily available, we use our incremental borrowing rate. Our incremental borrowing rate is based on an estimated secured
rate comprised of a risk-free LIBOR rate plus a credit spread as secured by our assets. Determining a credit spread as secured by our assets may require significant judgment.
Certain of our lease agreements include rental payments based on changes in the consumer price index (“CPI”). Lease liabilities are not remeasured as a result of changes in the CPI; instead, changes in the CPI are treated as variable lease payments and are excluded from the measurement of the right-of-use asset and lease liability. These payments are recognized in the period in which the related obligation is incurred. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
Generally, we elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components in arrangements where we are the lessee. For arrangements in which we are the lessor of wireless devices, we did not elect this practical expedient. We did not elect the short-term lease recognition exemption; as such, leases with terms shorter than 12-months are included as a right-of-use asset and lease liability.
Rental revenues and expenses associated with co-location tower sites are presented on a net basis under Topic 842. These revenues and expenses were presented on a gross basis under Topic 840. See Note 17 - Leases for further information.
See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, for additional discussion regarding the accounting policies that governed leases prior to January 1, 2019.
Cell Tower Monetization Transactions
In 2012, we entered into a prepaid master lease in which we as the lessor provided the rights to utilize tower sites and we leased back space on certain of those towers.Prior to the Merger, Sprint entered into a similar lease-out and leaseback arrangement which we assumed in the Merger.
These arrangements are treated as failed sale leasebacks in which the proceeds received are reported as a financing obligation. The principal payments on the tower obligations are included in Other, net within Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.Our historical tower site asset costs are reported in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are depreciated. See Note 9 - Tower Obligations for further information.
Sprint Retirement Pension Plan
Through the Merger, we acquired the assets and assumed the liabilities associated with the Sprint Retirement Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”), which is a defined benefit pension plan providing postretirement benefits to certain employees. As of December 31, 2005, the Pension Plan was amended to freeze benefit plan accruals for participants.
The investments in the Pension Plan are measured at fair value on a recurring basis each quarter using quoted market prices or the net asset value per share as a practical expedient. The projected benefit obligations associated with the Pension Plan are determined based on actuarial models utilizing mortality tables and discount rates applied to the expected benefit term. See Note 11 - Employee Compensation and Benefit Plans for further information on the Pension Plan.
Advertising Expense
We expense the cost of advertising and other promotional expenditures to market our services and products as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, advertising expenses included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income were $1.8 billion, $1.6 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences are realized. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset depends on the ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character and in the appropriate taxing jurisdictions within the carryforward periods available.
We account for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the accounting guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We
assess whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position and adjust the unrecognized tax benefits in light of changes in facts and circumstances, such as changes in tax law, interactions with taxing authorities and developments in case law.
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss) consists of adjustments, net of tax, related to unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, available-for-sale securities, foreign currency translation and pension and other postretirement benefits. This is reported in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized in earnings.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation cost for stock awards, which include restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”), is measured at fair value on the grant date and recognized as expense, net of expected forfeitures, over the related service period. The fair value of stock awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. RSUs are recognized as expense using the straight-line method. PRSUs are recognized as expense following a graded vesting schedule with their performance re-assessed and updated on a quarterly basis, or more frequently as changes in facts and circumstances warrant.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing Net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of outstanding stock options, RSUs and PRSUs, calculated using the treasury stock method. See Note 16 - Earnings Per Share for further information.
Variable Interest Entities
VIEs are entities that lack sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, have equity investors that do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating to the entity's operations through voting rights, do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses or do not have the right to receive the residual returns of the entity. The most common type of VIE is a special purpose entity (“SPE”). SPEs are commonly used in securitization transactions in order to isolate certain assets and distribute the cash flows from those assets to investors. SPEs are generally structured to insulate investors from claims on the SPEs’ assets by creditors of other entities, including the creditors of the seller of the assets, these SPEs are commonly referred to as being bankruptcy remote.
The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is the party which has both the power to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, and through its interests in the VIE, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE which could potentially be significant to the VIE. We consolidate VIEs when we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary or when the VIE cannot be deconsolidated. See Note 4 - Sales of Certain Receivables and Note 9 - Tower Obligations for further information.
In assessing which party is the primary beneficiary, all the facts and circumstances are considered, including each party’s role in establishing the VIE and its ongoing rights and responsibilities. This assessment includes, first, identifying the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and second, identifying which party, if any, has power over those activities. In general, the parties that make the most significant decisions affecting the VIE (such as asset managers and servicers) or have the right to unilaterally remove those decision-makers are deemed to have the power to direct the activities of a VIE.
Device Purchases Cash Flow Presentation
We classify all device purchases, whether acquired for sale or lease, as operating cash outflows as our predominant strategy is to sell devices to customers rather than lease them. SeeNote 20 – Additional Financial Information for disclosures ofLeased devices transferred from inventory to property and equipment and Returned leased devices transferred from property and equipment to inventory.
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During the Current Year
Receivables and Expected Credit Losses
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” and has since modified the standard with several ASUs (collectively, the “new credit loss standard”). The new credit loss standard requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectibility of the reported amount. The new credit loss standard became effective for us, and we adopted the standard, on January 1, 2020. The new credit loss standard required a cumulative-effect adjustment to Accumulated deficit at the date of initial application, and as a result, we did not restate prior periods presented in the consolidated financial statements.
Under the new credit loss standard, we recognize lifetime expected credit losses at the inception of our credit risk exposures, whereas we previously recognized credit losses only when it was probable that they had been incurred. We also recognize expected credit losses on our EIP receivables, which are inclusive of all installment receivables acquired in the Merger or issued thereafter, separately from, and in addition to, any unamortized discount on those receivables. Prior to the adoption of the new credit loss standard, we had offset our estimate of probable losses on our EIP receivables by the amount of the related unamortized discounts on those receivables. We have developed an expected credit loss model incorporating forward-looking loss indicators. The cumulative effect of initially applying the new credit loss standard on our receivables portfolio on January 1, 2020 was an increase to our allowance for credit losses of $91 million, a decrease to our net deferred tax liabilities of $24 million and an increase to our Accumulated deficit of $67 million.
For EIP receivables acquired in the Merger, we also recognize expected credit losses separately from, and in addition to, the acquisition date fair value of the acquired EIP receivables.
Cloud Computing Arrangements
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Topic 350): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract.” The standard aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The standard also requires the presentation of the amortization of the capitalized implementation costs in the same line item in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income as the fees associated with the hosting arrangement. The standard became effective for us, and we adopted the standard, on January 1, 2020. We adopted the standard on a prospective basis applying it to implementation costs incurred subsequent to January 1, 2020 and, as a result, did not restate the prior periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Income Taxes
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.” The standard removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. We early adopted the standard on January 1, 2020 and have applied the standard retrospectively to all periods presented. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Guarantor Financial Information
On March 2, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted amendments to the financial disclosure requirements for guarantors and issuers of guaranteed securities, as well as for affiliates whose securities collateralize a registrant’s securities. The amendments revise Rules 3-10 and 3-16 of Regulation S-X, and relocate part of Rule 3-10 and all of Rule 3-16 to the new Article 13 in Regulation S-X, which is comprised of new Rules 13-01 and 13-02. We early adopted the requirements of the amendments on January 1, 2020, which included replacing guarantor condensed consolidating financial information with summarized financial information for the consolidated obligor group (Parent, Issuer, and Guarantor Subsidiaries) and no longer requiring guarantor cash flow information, financial information for non-guarantor subsidiaries, or a reconciliation to the consolidated results.
Regulation S-K Modernization Amendments
On August 26, 2020, the SEC adopted amendments to modernize the description of business (Item 101), legal proceedings (Item 103), and risk factor disclosures (Item 105) that registrants are required to make pursuant to Regulation S-K. The amendments are intended to elicit improved disclosures for investors and add efficiencies to the compliance efforts of registrants. The amendments are also intended to improve the readability of disclosure documents, as well as discourage repetition and reduce the disclosure of unnecessary information. The amendments became effective for us, and we adopted the amendments on November 9, 2020, which included making certain updates to our description of business and risk factor disclosures within our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Reference Rate Reform
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” The standard provides temporary optional expedients and allows for certain exceptions to applying existing GAAP for contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued as a result of reference rate reform. The standard is available for adoption for a limited time through December 31, 2022. We are currently evaluating the impact this standard will have, including optional expedients, on our consolidated financial statements.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Selected Financial Data and Supplementary Information Amendments
On January 11, 2021, the SEC adopted amendments to eliminate the requirement for Selected Financial Data, streamline the requirement to disclose Supplementary Financial Information and amend Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”). These amendments are intended to eliminate duplicative disclosures and modernize and enhance MD&A for the benefit of investors, while simplifying compliance efforts for registrants. The amendments became effective on February 10, 2021. We are currently evaluating the impact these amendments will have on our consolidated financial statements. We will apply the amendments, as applicable, to relevant filings made with the SEC subsequent to this Form 10-K.
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the SEC did not have, or are not expected to have, a significant impact on our present or future consolidated financial statements.
Note 2 – Business Combination
Business Combination Agreement and Amendments
On April 29, 2018, we entered into a Business Combination Agreement for the Merger. The Business Combination Agreement was subsequently amended to provide that, following the closing of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement (collectively, the “Transactions”), SoftBank Group Corp. (“SoftBank”) would indemnify us against certain specified matters and the loss of value arising out of, or resulting from, cessation of access to spectrum under certain circumstances and subject to certain limitations and qualifications.
On February 20, 2020, T-Mobile, SoftBank and Deutsche Telekom AG (“DT”) entered into a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”). Pursuant to the Letter Agreement, SoftBank agreed to cause its applicable affiliates to surrender to T-Mobile, for no additional consideration, an aggregate of 48,751,557 shares of T-Mobile common stock (such number of shares, the “SoftBank Specified Shares Amount”), effective immediately following the Effective Time (as defined in the Business Combination Agreement), making SoftBank’s exchange ratio 11.31 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock. This resulted in an effective exchange ratio of approximately 11.00 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock immediately following the closing of the Merger, an increase from the originally agreed 9.75 shares. Sprint stockholders other than SoftBank received the original fixed exchange ratio of 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock for each share of Sprint common stock, or the equivalent of approximately 9.75 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock.
The Letter Agreement requires T-Mobile to issue to SoftBank 48,751,557 shares of T-Mobile common stock, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Letter Agreement, for no additional consideration, if certain conditions are met. The
issuance of these shares is contingent on the trailing 45-day volume-weighted average price per share of T-Mobile common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market being equal to or greater than $150.00, at any time during the period commencing on April 1, 2022 and ending on December 31, 2025. If the threshold price is not met, then NaN of the SoftBank Specified Shares Amount will be issued.
Closing of Sprint Merger
On April 1, 2020, we completed the Merger, and as a result, Sprint and its subsidiaries became wholly owned consolidated subsidiaries of T-Mobile. Sprint was the fourth-largest telecommunications company in the U.S. offering a comprehensive range of wireless and wireline communication products and services. As a combined company, we expect to be able to rapidly launch a broad and deep nationwide 5G network, accelerate innovation, increase competition in the U.S. wireless, video and broadband industries and achieve significant synergies and cost reductions by eliminating redundancies within the combined network as well as other business processes and operations. We combined the Sprint and T-Mobile operations under the T-Mobile brand nationwide on August 2, 2020.
Upon completion of the Merger, each share of Sprint common stock was exchanged for 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock, or 9.75 shares of Sprint common stock for each share of T-Mobile common stock. After adjustments, including the holdback of the SoftBank Specified Shares Amount and fractional shares, we issued 373,396,310 shares of T-Mobile common stock to Sprint stockholders. The fair value of the T-Mobile common stock provided in exchange for Sprint common stock was approximately $31.3 billion.
Additional components of consideration included the repayment of certain of Sprint’s debt, replacement equity awards attributable to pre-combination services, contingent consideration and a cash payment received for certain reimbursed Merger expenses.
Immediately following the closing of the Merger and the surrender of the SoftBank Specified Shares Amount, pursuant to the Letter Agreement described above, DT and SoftBank held, directly or indirectly, approximately 43.6% and 24.7%, respectively, of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock, with the remaining approximately 31.7% of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock held by other stockholders.
Consideration Transferred
The acquisition-date fair value of consideration transferred in the Merger totaled $40.8 billion, comprised of the following:
| | | | | |
| (in millions) | April 1, 2020 |
Fair value of T-Mobile common stock issued to Sprint stockholders (1) | $ | 31,328 | |
Fair value of T-Mobile replacement equity awards attributable to pre-combination service (2) | 323 | |
Repayment of Sprint’s debt (including accrued interest and prepayment penalties) (3) | 7,396 | |
| |
Value of contingent consideration (4) | 1,882 | |
Payment received from selling stockholder (5) | (102) | |
| Total consideration exchanged | $ | 40,827 | |
(1) Represents the fair value of T-Mobile common stock issued to Sprint stockholders pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, less shares surrendered by SoftBank pursuant to the Letter Agreement. The fair value is based on 373,396,310 shares of Sprint common stock issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2020, an exchange ratio of 0.10256 shares of T-Mobile common stock per share of Sprint common stock, less 48,751,557 T-Mobile shares surrendered by SoftBank which are treated as contingent consideration, and the closing price per share of T-Mobile common stock on NASDAQ on March 31, 2020, of $83.90, as shares were transferred to Sprint stockholders prior to the opening of markets on April 1, 2020.
(2) Equity-based awards held by Sprint employees prior to the acquisition date have been replaced with T-Mobile equity-based awards. The portion of the equity-based awards that relates to services performed by the employee prior to the acquisition date is included within consideration transferred, and includes stock options, restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units.
(3) Represents the cash consideration paid concurrent with the close of the Merger to retire certain Sprint debt, as required by change in control provisions of the debt, plus interest and prepayment penalties.
(4) Represents the fair value of the SoftBank Specified Shares Amount contingent consideration that may be issued as set forth in the Letter Agreement.
(5) Represents receipt of a cash payment from SoftBank for certain expenses associated with the Merger and is presented in Cash paid for acquisition of companies, net of cash acquired within our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The SoftBank Specified Shares Amount was determined to be contingent consideration with an acquisition-date fair value of $1.9 billion. We estimated the fair value using the income approach, a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model, whereby a Monte Carlo simulation method estimated the probability of different outcomes as the likelihood of achieving the 45-day volume-weighted average price threshold is not easily predicted. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and, therefore, represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The key
assumptions in applying the income approach include estimated future share-price volatility, which was based on historical market trends and estimated future performance of T-Mobile.
The maximum amount of contingent consideration that could be issued to SoftBank has an estimated value of $7.3 billion, based on SoftBank Specified Shares Amount of 48,751,557 multiplied by the defined volume-weighted average price per share of $150.00. The contingent consideration that could be delivered to SoftBank is classified within equity and is not subject to remeasurement.
Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
We accounted for the Merger as a business combination. The identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Sprint were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date and consolidated with those of T-Mobile. Assigning fair market values to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of an acquisition requires the use of significant judgment regarding estimates and assumptions. For the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, we used the cost, income and market approaches, including market participant assumptions.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values for each major class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. We retained the services of certified valuation specialists to assist with assigning estimated values to certain acquired assets and assumed liabilities. As of December 31, 2020, the valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is substantially complete except for the finalization of certain aspects of spectrum valuation, the valuation of certain income tax matters and loss contingencies.
| | | | | |
| (in millions) | April 1, 2020 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,084 | |
| Accounts receivable | 1,781 | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables | 1,088 | |
| Inventory | 658 | |
| Prepaid expenses | 140 | |
| Assets held for sale | 1,908 | |
| Other current assets | 631 | |
| Property and equipment | 18,435 | |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | 6,583 | |
| Financing lease right-of-use assets | 291 | |
| Goodwill | 9,401 | |
| Spectrum licenses | 45,400 | |
| Other intangible assets | 6,325 | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net | 247 | |
Other assets (1) | 540 | |
| Total assets acquired | 95,512 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 4,944 | |
| Short-term debt | 2,760 | |
| Deferred revenue | 508 | |
| Short-term operating lease liabilities | 1,818 | |
| Short-term financing lease liabilities | 8 | |
| Liabilities held for sale | 475 | |
| Other current liabilities | 671 | |
| Long-term debt | 29,037 | |
| Tower obligations | 950 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 3,513 | |
| Operating lease liabilities | 5,615 | |
| Financing lease liabilities | 12 | |
| |
| Other long-term liabilities | 4,374 | |
| Total liabilities assumed | 54,685 | |
| |
| Total consideration transferred | $ | 40,827 | |
(1) Included in Other assets acquired is $80 million in restricted cash.
Amounts previously disclosed for the estimated values of certain acquired assets and liabilities assumed have been revised based on additional information arising subsequent to the initial valuation.
Significant Measurement Period Adjustments
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized measurement period adjustments to reflect facts and circumstances in existence as of the date of the Merger. These adjustments included:
•An increase of $1.2 billion in Property and equipment related to the finalization of valuations related to certain tower assets and an increase of $1.7 billion in Other long-term liabilities associated with contract terms that are unfavorable to market terms. See Note 9 – Tower Obligations for further information; and •A decrease of $690 million in Deferred tax liabilities resulting from a $357 million reclassification from deferred tax liabilities to current liabilities and the continued assessment of valuation allowance necessary as of the date of the Merger along with tax effecting measurement period adjustments. See Note 13 - Income Taxes for further information.
The measurement period adjustments did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2020. The net impact of the measurement period adjustments resulted in a net increase to goodwill.
Intangible Assets and Liabilities
Goodwill with a provisionally assigned value of $9.4 billion represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The preliminary goodwill recognized includes synergies expected to be achieved from the operations of the combined company, the assembled workforce of Sprint and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition. Expected synergies include the cost savings from the planned integration of network infrastructure, facilities, personnel and systems. NaN of the goodwill resulting from the Merger is deductible for tax purposes. All of the goodwill acquired is allocated to the wireless reporting unit.
Other intangible assets include $4.9 billion of customer relationships with a weighted-average useful life of eight years and tradenames of $207 million with a useful life of two years. Leased spectrum arrangements that have favorable (asset) and unfavorable (liability) terms compared to current market rates were assigned preliminary fair values of $790 million and $197 million, respectively, with 18 year and 19 year weighted average useful lives, respectively.
The preliminary fair value of Spectrum licenses of $45.4 billion was estimated using the income approach, specifically a Greenfield model. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and, therefore, represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The key assumptions in applying the income approach include the discount rate, market share, estimated capital and operating expenditures, forecasted service revenue and long-term growth rate for a hypothetical market participant that enters the wireless industry and builds a nationwide wireless network.
Acquired Receivables
The fair value of the assets acquired include Accounts receivable of $1.8 billion and EIP receivables of $1.3 billion. The unpaid principal balance under these contracts as of the Merger date was $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively. The difference between the fair value and the unpaid principal balance primarily represents amounts expected to be uncollectible.
Indemnification Assets and Contingent Liabilities
Pursuant to Amendment No 2. to the Business Combination Agreement, SoftBank agreed to indemnify us against certain specified matters and losses. As of December 31, 2020, we have recorded a contingent liability and an offsetting indemnification asset for the expected reimbursement by SoftBank for certain Lifeline matters that have not been resolved. The liability is presented in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and the indemnification asset is presented in Other current assets within our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In November 2020, we entered into a consent decree with the FCC to resolve certain Lifeline matters, which resulted in a payment of $200 million by SoftBank. We expect that any additional liabilities related to these indemnified matters would be indemnified and reimbursed by SoftBank.
Transaction Costs
We recognized transaction costs of $201 million, $106 million and $71 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These costs were associated with legal and professional services and were recognized as Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited pro forma financial information gives effect to the Transactions as if they had been completed on January 1, 2019. The unaudited pro forma information was prepared in accordance with the requirements of ASC 805, which is a different basis than pro forma information prepared under Article 11 of Regulation S-X (“Article 11”). As such, they are not directly comparable with historical results for stand-alone T-Mobile prior to April 1, 2020, historical results for T-Mobile from April 1, 2020 that reflect the Transactions and are inclusive of the results and operations of Sprint, nor our previously provided pro forma financials prepared in accordance with Article 11. The pro forma results for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 include the impact of several adjustments to previously reported operating results. The pro forma adjustments are based on historically reported transactions by the respective companies. The pro forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the acquisition.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions, except per share amounts) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Total revenues | | | | | $ | 74,681 | | | $ | 70,607 | |
| Income from continuing operations | | | | | 3,302 | | | 185 | |
| Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | | | 677 | | | 1,594 | |
| Net income | | | | | 3,979 | | | 1,792 | |
Significant nonrecurring pro forma adjustments include:
•Transaction costs of $559 million are assumed to have occurred on January 1, 2019, and are recognized as if incurred in the first quarter of 2019;
•The Prepaid Business divested on July 1, 2020, is assumed to have been classified as discontinued operations as of January 1, 2019, and the related activities are presented in Income from discontinued operations, net of tax;
•Permanent financing issued and debt redemptions occurring in connection with the closing of the Merger are assumed to have occurred on January 1, 2019, and historical interest expense associated with repaid borrowings is removed;
•Tangible and intangible assets are assumed to be recorded at their estimated fair values as of the pro forma close date of January 1, 2019 and are depreciated or amortized over their estimated useful lives; and
The selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is provided for illustrative purposes only and does not purport to represent what the actual consolidated results of operations would have been had the Transactions actually occurred on January 1, 2019, nor do they purport to project the future consolidated results of operations.
For the periods subsequent to the Merger close date, the acquired Sprint subsidiaries contributed total revenues and operating income of $20.5 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020, that were included in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Financing
In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile USA”) entered into a commitment letter, dated as of April 29, 2018 (as amended and restated on May 15, 2018 and on September 6, 2019, the “Commitment Letter”). On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we drew down on our $19.0 billion New Secured Bridge Loan Facility and our $4.0 billion New Secured Term Loan Facility (each as defined below). We used the net proceeds from the drawdown of the secured facilities to refinance certain existing debt of us, Sprint and our and Sprint’s respective subsidiaries and for post-closing general corporate purposes of the combined company. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.
In connection with the financing provided for in the Commitment Letter, we incurred certain fees payable to the financial institutions. On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we paid $355 million in Commitment Letter fees to certain financial institutions. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.
In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, DT and T-Mobile USA entered into a Financing Matters Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2018 (the “Financing Matters Agreement”), pursuant to which DT agreed, among other things, to consent to, subject to certain conditions, amendments to certain existing debt owed to DT, in connection with the Merger. On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we made a payment for requisite consents to DT of $13 million. SeeNote 8 – Debtfor further information.
On May 18, 2018, under the terms and conditions described in the Consent Solicitation Statement dated as of May 14, 2018 (the “Consent Solicitation Statement”), we obtained consents necessary to effect amendments to certain existing debt of us and our subsidiaries. On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we made payments for requisite consents to third-party note holders of $95 million. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information.
Regulatory Matters
The Transactions were the subject of various legal and regulatory proceedings involving a number of state and federal agencies. In connection with those proceedings and the approval of the Transactions, we have certain commitments and other obligations to various state and federal agencies and certain nongovernmental organizations. See Note 18 - Commitments and Contingencies for further information.
Prepaid Transaction
On July 26, 2019, we entered into the Asset Purchase Agreement with Sprint and DISH, pursuant to which, following the consummation of the Merger, DISH would acquire the Prepaid Business.
On June 17, 2020, T-Mobile, Sprint and DISH entered into the First Amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the First Amendment of the Asset Purchase Agreement, T-Mobile, Sprint and DISH agreed to proceed with the closing of the Prepaid Transaction in accordance with the Asset Purchase Agreement on July 1, 2020, subject to the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the terms and conditions of the Consent Decree.
On July 1, 2020, pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, we completed the Prepaid Transaction. Upon closing of the Prepaid Transaction, we received $1.4 billion from DISH for the Prepaid Business, subject to working capital adjustments. See Note 12 - Discontinued Operations for further information.
Shenandoah Personal Communications Company Affiliate Relationship
Sprint PCS (specifically Sprint Spectrum L.P.) is party to a variety of publicly filed agreements with Shenandoah Personal Communications Company LLC (“Shentel”), pursuant to which Shentel is the exclusive provider of Sprint PCS’s wireless mobility communications network products in certain parts of Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Pursuant to one such agreement, the Sprint PCS Management Agreement, dated November 5, 1999 (as amended, supplemented and modified from time to time, the “Management Agreement”), Sprint PCS was granted an option to purchase Shentel’s wireless telecommunications assets used to provide services pursuant to the Management Agreement. On August 26, 2020, Sprint, now our direct subsidiary, on behalf of and as the direct or indirect owner of Sprint PCS, exercised its option by delivering a binding notice of exercise to Shentel. The exercise of this option triggered a requirement for the parties to engage three independent valuation providers (the “Valuation Providers”) to calculate the “entire business value” (the “Entire Business Value”) of such wireless telecommunications assets, pursuant to a formula and valuation process prescribed in the Management Agreement.
Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on February 1, 2021, in accordance with the Management Agreement and other agreed-upon terms, the Valuation Providers determined and calculated the Entire Business Value of Shentel’s wireless telecommunication assets used to provide services pursuant to the Management Agreement to be $2.1 billion, and correspondingly, the base purchase price for such wireless telecommunication assets shall be ninety percent (90%) of that Entire Business Value amount ($1.9 billion), subject to certain other purchase price adjustments prescribed by the Management Agreement and such additional purchase price adjustments agreed by the parties. The parties are negotiating the remaining outstanding terms of a definitive agreement to govern the purchase of Shentel’s wireless telecommunication assets and expect the transaction to close in the second quarter of 2021 after satisfying customary conditions to closing.
Note 3 – Receivables and Expected Credit Losses
Our portfolio of receivables is comprised of 2 portfolio segments: accounts receivable and EIP receivables.
Accounts Receivable Portfolio Segment
Our accounts receivable segment primarily consists of amounts currently due from customers, including service and leased device receivables, device insurance administrators, wholesale partners, third-party retail channels and other carriers.
We estimate expected credit losses associated with our accounts receivable portfolio using an aging schedule methodology that utilizes historical information and current conditions to develop expected credit losses by aging bucket, including for receivables that are not past due.
To determine the appropriate credit loss percentages by aging bucket, we consider a number of factors, including our overall historical credit losses, net of recoveries and timely payment experience as well as current collection trends such as write-off frequency and severity, credit quality of the customer base, and other qualitative factors such as macro-economic conditions, including the expected economic impacts of the Pandemic.
We consider the need to adjust our estimate of expected credit losses for reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions. To do so, we monitor professional forecasts of changes in real U.S. gross domestic product and forecasts of consumer credit behavior for comparable credit exposures. We also periodically evaluate other economic indicators such as unemployment rates to assess their level of correlation with our historical credit loss statistics.
EIP Receivables Portfolio Segment
Based upon customer credit profiles at the time of customer origination, we classify the EIP receivables segment into 2 customer classes of “Prime” and “Subprime.” Prime customer receivables are those with lower credit risk and Subprime customer receivables are those with higher credit risk. Customers may be required to make a down payment on their equipment purchases. In addition, certain customers within the Subprime category are required to pay an advance deposit.
To determine a customer’s credit profile, we use a proprietary credit scoring model that measures the credit quality of a customer using several factors, such as credit bureau information, consumer credit risk scores and service and device plan characteristics.
Installment loans acquired in the Merger are included in EIP receivables. We applied our proprietary credit scoring model to the customers acquired in the Merger with an outstanding EIP receivable balance. Based on tenure, consumer credit risk score and credit profile, these acquired customers were classified into our customer classes of Prime or Subprime. Our proprietary credit scoring model is applied to all EIP arrangements originated after the Merger close date.
The following table summarizes the EIP receivables, including imputed discounts and related allowance for credit losses:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| | | |
| | | |
EIP receivables, gross (1) | $ | 6,213 | | | $ | 4,582 | |
| Unamortized imputed discount | (325) | | | (299) | |
| | | |
| EIP receivables, net of unamortized imputed discount | 5,888 | | | 4,283 | |
Allowance for credit losses (2) | (280) | | | (100) | |
| | | |
| EIP receivables, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount | $ | 5,608 | | | $ | 4,183 | |
| Classified on the balance sheet as: | | | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount | $ | 3,577 | | | $ | 2,600 | |
| Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount | 2,031 | | | 1,583 | |
| | | |
| EIP receivables, net of allowance for credit losses and imputed discount | $ | 5,608 | | | $ | 4,183 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
(1) Through the Merger, we acquired EIP receivables with a fair value of $1.3 billion as of April 1, 2020. As they were recorded at fair value, an imputed discount was not recognized on the acquired receivables.
(2) Allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2020 was impacted by the cumulative effect of initially applying the new credit loss standard on our receivables portfolio on January 1, 2020, which resulted in an increase to our allowance for credit losses of $91 million.
We manage our EIP receivables portfolio using delinquency and customer credit class as key credit quality indicators. As a part of the adoption of the new credit loss standard, we now disclose our EIP receivables portfolio disaggregated by origination year. EIP receivables acquired through the Merger are also presented by origination year. The following table presents the
amortized cost of our EIP receivables by delinquency status, customer credit class, and year of origination as of December 31, 2020.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Originated in 2020 | | Originated in 2019 | | Originated prior to 2019 | | Total EIP Receivables, net of
unamortized imputed discounts |
| (in millions) | Prime | | Subprime | | Prime | | Subprime | | Prime | | Subprime | | Prime | | Subprime | | Grand total |
| Current - 30 days past due | $ | 2,654 | | | $ | 2,035 | | | $ | 528 | | | $ | 407 | | | $ | 124 | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | 3,306 | | | $ | 2,468 | | | $ | 5,774 | |
| 31 - 60 days past due | 16 | | | 30 | | | 6 | | | 12 | | | 1 | | | 0 | | | 23 | | | 42 | | | 65 | |
| 61 - 90 days past due | 4 | | | 13 | | | 2 | | | 5 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 6 | | | 18 | | | 24 | |
| More than 90 days past due | 3 | | | 11 | | | 2 | | | 6 | | | 1 | | | 2 | | | 6 | | | 19 | | | 25 | |
| EIP receivables, net of unamortized imputed discount | $ | 2,677 | | | $ | 2,089 | | | $ | 538 | | | $ | 430 | | | $ | 126 | | | $ | 28 | | | $ | 3,341 | | | $ | 2,547 | | | $ | 5,888 | |
We estimate expected credit losses on our EIP receivables by using historical data adjusted for current conditions to calculate default probabilities for our outstanding EIP loans. We consider various risk characteristics when calculating default probabilities, such as how long such loans have been outstanding, customer credit ratings, customer tenure, delinquency status and other correlated variables identified through statistical analyses. We multiply these estimated default probabilities by our estimated loss given default, which considers recoveries.
As we do for our accounts receivable portfolio segment, we consider the need to adjust our estimate of expected losses on EIP receivables for reasonable and supportable forecasts of economic conditions through monitoring of external professional forecasts and periodic internal statistical analyses, including the expected economic impacts of the Pandemic.
For EIP receivables acquired in the Merger, the difference between the fair value and unpaid principal balance of the loan at the
acquisition date is accreted to interest income over the contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method. EIP receivables had a combined weighted average effective interest rate of 6.7% and 8.8% as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Activity for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 in the allowance for credit losses and unamortized imputed discount balances for the accounts receivable and EIP receivables segments were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| (in millions) | Accounts Receivable Allowance | | EIP Receivables Allowance | | Total | Accounts Receivable Allowance | | EIP Receivables Allowance | | Total | | Accounts Receivable Allowance | | EIP Receivables Allowance | | Total |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, beginning of period | $ | 61 | | | $ | 399 | | | $ | 460 | | | $ | 67 | | | $ | 449 | | | $ | 516 | | | $ | 86 | | | $ | 396 | | | $ | 482 | |
| Beginning balance adjustment due to implementation of the new credit loss standard | 0 | | | 91 | | | 91 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Bad debt expense | 338 | | | 264 | | | 602 | | | 77 | | | 230 | | | 307 | | | 69 | | | 228 | | | 297 | |
| Write-offs, net of recoveries | (205) | | | (175) | | | (380) | | | (83) | | | (249) | | | (332) | | | (88) | | | (240) | | | (328) | |
| Change in imputed discount on short-term and long-term EIP receivables | N/A | | 171 | | | 171 | | | N/A | | 136 | | | 136 | | | N/A | | 250 | | | 250 | |
| Impact on the imputed discount from sales of EIP receivables | N/A | | (145) | | | (145) | | | N/A | | (167) | | | (167) | | | N/A | | (185) | | | (185) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for credit losses and imputed discount, end of period | $ | 194 | | | $ | 605 | | | $ | 799 | | | $ | 61 | | | $ | 399 | | | $ | 460 | | | $ | 67 | | | $ | 449 | | | $ | 516 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures
We do not have material, unmitigated off-balance-sheet credit exposures as of December 31, 2020. In connection with the sales of certain service and EIP accounts receivable pursuant to the sale arrangements, we have deferred purchase price assets
included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets measured at fair value that are based on a discounted cash flow model using unobservable Level 3 inputs, including customer default rates and credit worthiness, dilutions and recoveries. See Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables for further information.
Note 4 – Sales of Certain Receivables
We have entered into transactions to sell certain service accounts receivable and EIP receivables. The transactions, including our continuing involvement with the sold receivables and the respective impacts to our consolidated financial statements, are described below.
In conjunction with the Merger, the total principal amount outstanding under Sprint’s accounts receivable facility of $2.3 billion was repaid on April 1, 2020, and the facility was terminated.
Sales of Service Accounts Receivable
Overview of the Transaction
In 2014, we entered into an arrangement to sell certain service accounts receivable on a revolving basis (the “service receivable sale arrangement”). The maximum funding commitment of the service receivable sale arrangement is $950 million, and the facility expires in March 2021. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the service receivable sale arrangement provided funding of $772 million and $924 million, respectively. Sales of receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis. The receivables consist of service charges currently due from customers and are short-term in nature.
In connection with the service receivable sale arrangement, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary, which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity, to sell service accounts receivable (the “Service BRE”). The Service BRE does not qualify as a VIE, and due to the significant level of control we exercise over the entity, it is consolidated. Pursuant to the service receivable sale arrangement, certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries transfer selected receivables to the Service BRE. The Service BRE then sells the receivables to an unaffiliated entity (the “Service VIE”), which was established to facilitate the sale of beneficial ownership interests in the receivables to certain third parties.
Variable Interest Entity
We determined that the Service VIE qualifies as a VIE as it lacks sufficient equity to finance its activities. We have a variable interest in the Service VIE but are not the primary beneficiary as we lack the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the Service VIE’s economic performance. Those activities include committing the Service VIE to legal agreements to purchase or sell assets, selecting which receivables are purchased in the service receivable sale arrangement, determining whether the Service VIE will sell interests in the purchased service receivables to other parties, funding of the entity and servicing of receivables. We do not hold the power to direct the key decisions underlying these activities. For example, while we act as the servicer of the sold receivables, which is considered a significant activity of the Service VIE, we are acting as an agent in our capacity as the servicer, and the counterparty to the service receivable sale arrangement has the ability to remove us as the servicing agent of the receivables at will with no recourse available to us. As we have determined we are not the primary beneficiary, the balances and results of the Service VIE are not included in our consolidated financial statements.
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and classification of assets, which consist primarily of the deferred purchase price, and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets that relate to our variable interest in the Service VIE:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| Other current assets | $ | 378 | | | $ | 350 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 0 | | | 25 | |
| Other current liabilities | 357 | | | 342 | |
Sales of EIP Receivables
Overview of the Transaction
In 2015, we entered into an arrangement to sell certain EIP accounts receivable on a revolving basis (the “EIP sale arrangement”). The maximum funding commitment of the sale arrangement is $1.3 billion. In February 2020, we amended the
sale arrangement to provide for an alternative advance rate methodology for the EIP accounts receivable sold in the sale arrangement and to make certain other administrative changes. On November 2, 2020, we extended the scheduled expiration date of the EIP sale arrangement to November 18, 2021.
On April 30, 2020, we agreed with the purchaser banks to update our collection policies to temporarily allow for flexibility for modifications to the accounts receivable sold that are impacted by COVID-19 and exclusion of such accounts receivable from all pool performance triggers.
As of both December 31, 2020 and 2019, the EIP sale arrangement provided funding of $1.3 billion. Sales of EIP receivables occur daily and are settled on a monthly basis.
In connection with this EIP sale arrangement, we formed a wholly owned subsidiary, which qualifies as a bankruptcy remote entity (the “EIP BRE”). Pursuant to the EIP sale arrangement, our wholly owned subsidiary transfers selected receivables to the EIP BRE. The EIP BRE then sells the receivables to a non-consolidated and unaffiliated third-party entity over which we do not exercise any level of control, nor does the third-party entity qualify as a VIE.
Variable Interest Entity
We determined that the EIP BRE is a VIE as its equity investment at risk lacks the obligation to absorb a certain portion of its expected losses. We have a variable interest in the EIP BRE and have determined that we are the primary beneficiary based on our ability to direct the activities which most significantly impact the EIP BRE’s economic performance. Those activities include selecting which receivables are transferred into the EIP BRE and sold in the EIP sale arrangement and funding of the EIP BRE. Additionally, our equity interest in the EIP BRE obligates us to absorb losses and gives us the right to receive benefits from the EIP BRE that could potentially be significant to the EIP BRE. Accordingly, we include the balances and results of operations of the EIP BRE in our consolidated financial statements.
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and classification of assets, which consist primarily of the deferred purchase price, and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets of the EIP BRE:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| Other current assets | $ | 388 | | | $ | 344 | |
| Other assets | 120 | | | 89 | |
| Other long-term liabilities | 4 | | | 18 | |
In addition, the EIP BRE is a separate legal entity with its own separate creditors who will be entitled, prior to any liquidation of the EIP BRE, to be satisfied prior to any value in the EIP BRE becoming available to us. Accordingly, the assets of the EIP BRE may not be used to settle our general obligations and creditors of the EIP BRE have limited recourse to our general credit.
Sales of Receivables
The transfers of service receivables and EIP receivables to the non-consolidated entities are accounted for as sales of financial assets. Once identified for sale, the receivable is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. Upon sale, we derecognize the net carrying amount of the receivables.
We recognize the cash proceeds received upon sale in Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. We recognize proceeds net of the deferred purchase price, consisting of a receivable from the purchasers that entitles us to certain collections on the receivables. We recognize the collection of the deferred purchase price in Net cash used in investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as Proceeds related to beneficial interests in securitization transactions.
The deferred purchase price represents a financial asset that is primarily tied to the creditworthiness of the customers and which can be settled in such a way that we may not recover substantially all of our recorded investment, due to default by the customers on the underlying receivables. At inception, we elected to measure the deferred purchase price at fair value with changes in fair value included in Selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The fair value of the deferred purchase price is determined based on a discounted cash flow model which uses primarily unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs), including customer default rates. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, our
deferred purchase price related to the sales of service receivables and EIP receivables was $884 million and $781 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes the impact of the sale of certain service receivables and EIP receivables in our Consolidated Balance Sheets:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| Derecognized net service receivables and EIP receivables | $ | 2,528 | | | $ | 2,584 | |
| Other current assets | 766 | | | 694 | |
| of which, deferred purchase price | 764 | | | 692 | |
| Other long-term assets | 120 | | | 89 | |
| of which, deferred purchase price | 120 | | | 89 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 0 | | | 25 | |
| Other current liabilities | 357 | | | 342 | |
| Other long-term liabilities | 4 | | | 18 | |
| Net cash proceeds since inception | 1,715 | | | 1,944 | |
| Of which: | | | |
| Change in net cash proceeds during the year-to-date period | (229) | | | 65 | |
| Net cash proceeds funded by reinvested collections | 1,944 | | | 1,879 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
We recognized losses from sales of receivables, including adjustments to the receivables’ fair values and changes in fair value of the deferred purchase price, of $36 million, $130 million and $157 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, in Selling, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Continuing Involvement
Pursuant to the sale arrangements described above, we have continuing involvement with the service receivables and EIP receivables we sell as we service the receivables and are required to repurchase certain receivables, including ineligible receivables, aged receivables and receivables where write-off is imminent. We continue to service the customers and their related receivables, including facilitating customer payment collection, in exchange for a monthly servicing fee. As the receivables are sold on a revolving basis, the customer payment collections on sold receivables may be reinvested in new receivable sales. At the direction of the purchasers of the sold receivables, we apply the same policies and procedures while servicing the sold receivables as we apply to our owned receivables, and we continue to maintain normal relationships with our customers. Pursuant to the EIP sale arrangement, under certain circumstances, we are required to deposit cash or replacement EIP receivables primarily for contracts terminated by customers under our JUMP! On Demand program.
In addition, we have continuing involvement with the sold receivables as we may be responsible for absorbing additional credit losses pursuant to the sale arrangements. Our maximum exposure to loss related to the involvement with the service receivables and EIP receivables sold under the sale arrangements was $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2020. The maximum exposure to loss, which is a required disclosure under U.S. GAAP, represents an estimated loss that would be incurred under severe, hypothetical circumstances whereby we would not receive the deferred purchase price portion of the contractual proceeds withheld by the purchasers and would also be required to repurchase the maximum amount of receivables pursuant to the sale arrangements without consideration for any recovery. We believe the probability of these circumstances occurring is remote and the maximum exposure to loss is not an indication of our expected loss.
Note 5 – Property and Equipment
The components of property and equipment were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Useful Lives | | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| | | | | |
| Land | | | $ | 236 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Buildings and equipment | Up to 30 years | | 4,006 | | | 2,587 | |
| Wireless communications systems | Up to 20 years | | 49,453 | | | 34,353 | |
| Leasehold improvements | Up to 12 years | | 1,879 | | | 1,345 | |
| Capitalized software | Up to 10 years | | 16,412 | | | 12,705 | |
| Leased wireless devices | Up to 19 months | | 6,989 | | | 1,139 | |
| Construction in progress | | | 4,595 | | | 2,973 | |
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (42,395) | | | (33,118) | |
| | | | | |
| Property and equipment, net | | | $ | 41,175 | | | $ | 21,984 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Total depreciation expense relating to property and equipment and financing lease right-of-use assets was $13.1 billion, $6.5 billion and $6.4 billion for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These amounts include depreciation expense related to leased wireless devices of $3.1 billion, $543 million and $940 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
We capitalize interest associated with the acquisition or construction of certain property and equipment and spectrum intangible assets. We recognized capitalized interest of $440 million, $473 million and $362 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Asset retirement obligations are primarily for certain legal obligations to remediate leased property on which our network infrastructure and administrative assets are located.
Activity in our asset retirement obligations was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Year Ended
December 31, 2020 | | Year Ended
December 31, 2019 |
| | | |
| Asset retirement obligations, beginning of year | $ | 659 | | | $ | 609 | |
| Fair value of liabilities acquired through Merger | 1,110 | | | 0 | |
| Liabilities incurred | 16 | | | 35 | |
| Liabilities settled | (40) | | | (2) | |
| Accretion expense | 55 | | | 32 | |
| Changes in estimated cash flows | 17 | | | (15) | |
| | | |
| Asset retirement obligations, end of period | $ | 1,817 | | | $ | 659 | |
| | | |
| Classified on the balance sheet as: | | | |
| | | |
| Other current liabilities | $ | 14 | | | $ | 0 | |
| Other long-term liabilities | 1,803 | | | 659 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
The corresponding assets, net of accumulated depreciation, related to asset retirement obligations were $912 million and $159 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Postpaid Billing System Impairment
In connection with the continuing integration of the businesses following the Merger, we evaluated the long-term billing system architecture strategy for our postpaid customers. In order to facilitate customer migration from the Sprint legacy billing platform, our postpaid billing system replacement plan and associated development will no longer serve our future needs. As a result, we recorded a non-cash impairment of $200 million related to capitalized software development costs for the year ended December 31, 2020, all of which relates to the impairment recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2020. The expense is included within Impairment expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. There were 0 impairments recognized for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Note 6 – Goodwill, Spectrum License Transactions and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, are as follows:
| | | | | |
| (in millions) | Goodwill |
| |
| Historical goodwill, net of accumulated impairment losses of $10,766 | $ | 1,901 | |
| Goodwill from acquisition in 2019 | 29 | |
| |
| Balance as of December 31, 2019 | 1,930 | |
| |
| Goodwill from acquisitions in 2020 | 9,405 | |
| Layer3 goodwill impairment | (218) | |
| |
| Balance as of December 31, 2020 | $ | 11,117 | |
| Accumulated impairment losses at December 31, 2020 | $ | (10,984) | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
On April 1, 2020, we completed our Merger with Sprint, which was accounted for as a business combination resulting in $9.4 billion in goodwill. The acquired goodwill was allocated to the wireless reporting unit and will be tested for impairment at this level. See Note 2 - Business Combination for further information.
Goodwill Impairment Assessment
Certain non-financial assets, including goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets such as Spectrum licenses, are not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are reported at carrying value. However, these assets are required to be assessed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that carrying value may not be recoverable, and at least annually for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. The nonrecurring measurements of the fair value of these assets, for which observable market information may be limited, are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In the event an impairment is required, the asset is adjusted to its estimated fair value using market-based assumptions, to the extent they are available, as well as other assumptions that may require significant judgement.
For our assessment of the wireless reporting unit we employed a qualitative approach. The fair value of the wireless reporting unit is estimated using a market approach, which is based on market capitalization. We recognize market capitalization is subject to volatility and will monitor changes in market capitalization to determine whether declines, if any, necessitate an interim impairment review. In the event market capitalization does decline below its book value, we will consider the length, severity and reasons for the decline when assessing whether potential impairment exists, including considering whether a control premium should be added to the market capitalization. We believe short-term fluctuations in share price may not necessarily reflect the underlying aggregate fair value. No events or change in circumstances have occurred that indicate the fair value of the wireless reporting unit may be below its carrying amount at December 31, 2020.
Our enhanced in-home broadband opportunity following the Merger, along with the acquisition of certain content rights, has created a strategic shift in our TVisionTM services offering, allowing us the ability to develop a video product that will be complementary to the in-home broadband offering. As a result of the change in the stand-alone product offering plans and timing, we completed an interim goodwill impairment analysis for the Layer3 reporting unit and recognized a goodwill impairment of $218 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, all of which relates to the impairment recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2020. This impairment reduced the goodwill assigned to the Layer3 reporting unit to 0. The expense is included within Impairment expense in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. There were 0 goodwill impairments recognized for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgment including the determination of the fair value of the reporting unit. We employed an income approach to assess the fair value of the Layer3 reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Inherent in our preparation of cash flow projections are assumptions and estimates derived from a review of our business plans, expected growth rates, cost of capital and tax rates. We also made certain forecasts about future business strategies and economic conditions, market data, and other assumptions, such as estimates of subscribers for TVisionTM services, average revenue and content cost per subscriber. The discount rate used was based on the weighted average cost of capital adjusted for the risk associated with business-specific characteristics and the uncertainty related to the business’s ability to execute on the projected cash flows. As of December 31, 2020, Goodwill was only assigned to the wireless reporting unit as the Goodwill assigned to the Layer3 reporting unit was written-off to a 0 balance during the year ended December 31, 2020.
Intangible Assets
Identifiable Intangible Assets Acquired
The following table summarizes the fair value of the intangible assets acquired in the Merger:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted Average Useful Life (in years) | | Fair Value as of April 1, 2020
(in millions) |
| Spectrum licenses | Indefinite-lived | | $ | 45,400 | |
Tradenames (1) | 2 years | | 207 | |
| Customer relationships | 8 years | | 4,900 | |
| Favorable spectrum leases | 18 years | | 790 | |
| Other intangible assets | 7 years | | 428 | |
| Total intangible assets acquired | | | $ | 51,725 | |
(1) Tradenames include the Sprint brand
Spectrum licenses are issued for a fixed period of time, typically up to 15 years; however, the FCC has granted license renewals routinely and at a nominal cost. The spectrum licenses acquired expire at various dates and we believe we will be able to meet all requirements necessary to secure renewal of our spectrum licenses at a nominal cost. Moreover, we determined that there are currently no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic or other factors that limit the useful lives of our spectrum licenses. Therefore, we determined the spectrum licenses should be treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets. The fair value of spectrum licenses includes the value associated with aggregating a nationwide portfolio of owned and leased spectrum.
Favorable spectrum leases represent a lease contract where the market rate is higher than the future contractual lease payments. We lease this spectrum from third parties who hold the spectrum licenses. As these contracts pertain to intangible assets, they are excluded from the lease accounting guidance (ASC 842) and are accounted for as service contracts in which the expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease team. Favorable spectrum leases of $790 million were recorded as an intangible asset as a result of purchase accounting and will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the associated remaining lease term. Additionally, we recognized unfavorable spectrum lease liabilities of $197 million, which are also amortized over their respective remaining lease terms and are included in Other liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The customer relationship intangible assets represent the value associated with the acquired Sprint customers. The customer relationship intangible assets are amortized using the sum-of-the-years digits method over periods of up to eight years.
Other intangible assets are amortized over the remaining period that the asset is expected to provide benefit to us.
Spectrum Licenses
The following table summarizes our spectrum license activity for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Spectrum licenses, beginning of year | $ | 36,465 | | | $ | 35,559 | |
| | | |
| Spectrum license acquisitions | 1,023 | | | 857 | |
| Spectrum licenses acquired in Merger | 45,400 | | | 0 | |
| Spectrum licenses transferred to held for sale | (83) | | | 0 | |
| Costs to clear spectrum | 23 | | | 49 | |
| | | |
| Spectrum licenses, end of year | $ | 82,828 | | | $ | 36,465 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Spectrum Transactions
In March 2020, the FCC announced that we were the winning bidder of 2,384 licenses in Auction 103 (37/39 GHz and 47 GHz spectrum bands) for an aggregate price of $873 million, net of an incentive payment of $59 million. At the inception of Auction 103 in October 2019, we deposited $82 million with the FCC. Upon conclusion of Auction 103 in March 2020, we made a down payment of $93 million for the purchase price of the licenses won in the auction. On April 8, 2020, we paid the FCC the remaining $698 million of the purchase price for the licenses won in the auction. Prior to the Merger, the FCC announced that Sprint was the winning bidder of 127 licenses in Auction 103 (37/39 GHz and 47 GHz spectrum bands). All payments related to the licenses won were made by Sprint prior to the Merger.
In November 2020, we executed an agreement with a third party for the exchange of certain AWS spectrum licenses. Upon the execution of the agreement, the spectrum licenses were classified as assets held for sale, included within Other current assets, and measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell, which resulted in the recognition of a non-cash impairment loss of $35 million, included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. We received approval for the transaction from the FCC and the transaction closed in the first quarter of 2021.
The licenses are included in Spectrum licenses in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020. Cash payments to acquire spectrum licenses and payments for costs to clear spectrum are included in Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits, in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2020.
In April 2020, we acquired FCC licenses in the 800 MHz, 1900 MHz, and 2.5 GHz bands as part of the Merger with Sprint at an estimated fair value of approximately $45.4 billion. See Note 2 - Business Combination for further information.
Impairment assessment
For our assessment of Spectrum license impairment, we employed a qualitative approach. No events or change in circumstances have occurred that indicate the fair value of the Spectrum licenses may be below its carrying amount at December 31, 2020.
Other Intangible Assets
The components of Other intangible assets were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Useful Lives | | December 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| (in millions) | | Gross Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Amount | | Gross Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Amount |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Customer relationships | Up to 8 years | | $ | 4,900 | | | $ | (865) | | | $ | 4,035 | | | $ | 1,104 | | | $ | (1,104) | | | $ | 0 | |
| Tradenames and patents | Up to 19 years | | 598 | | | (412) | | | 186 | | | 323 | | | (258) | | | 65 | |
| Favorable spectrum leases | Up to 27 years | | 790 | | | (35) | | | 755 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Other | Up to 10 years | | 377 | | | (55) | | | 322 | | | 100 | | | (50) | | | 50 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other intangible assets | | | $ | 6,665 | | | $ | (1,367) | | | $ | 5,298 | | | $ | 1,527 | | | $ | (1,412) | | | $ | 115 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization was $1.2 billion, $82 million and $124 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The estimated aggregate future amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization are summarized below:
| | | | | |
| (in millions) | Estimated Future Amortization |
| |
| Twelve Months Ending December 31, | |
| 2021 | $ | 1,246 | |
| 2022 | 982 | |
| 2023 | 827 | |
| 2024 | 669 | |
| 2025 | 511 | |
| Thereafter | 1,063 | |
| |
| Total | $ | 5,298 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Substantially all of the estimated future amortization expense is associated with intangible assets acquired in the Merger.
Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements
The carrying values of Cash and cash equivalents, Accounts receivable, Accounts receivable from affiliates, Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and borrowings under vendor financing arrangements with our primary network equipment suppliers approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Periodically, we use derivatives to manage exposure to market risk, such as interest rate risk. We designate certain derivatives as hedging instruments in a qualifying hedge accounting relationship (cash flow hedge) to help minimize significant, unplanned fluctuations in cash flows caused by interest rate volatility. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest Rate Lock Derivatives
In October 2018, we entered into interest rate lock derivatives with notional amounts of $9.6 billion. In November 2019, we extended the mandatory termination date on our interest rate lock derivatives to June 3, 2020. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, we made net collateral transfers to certain of our derivative counterparties totaling $580 million, which included variation margin transfers to (or from) such derivative counterparties based on daily market movements. No amounts were transferred to the derivative counterparties subsequent to March 31, 2020. These collateral transfers are included inNet cash related to derivative contracts under collateral exchange arrangements within Net cash used in investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The net collateral transfers to certain of our derivative counterparties totaled $632 million for the three months ended December 31, 2019, and was presented in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. There was no collateral receivable balance as of December 31, 2020.
We record interest rate lock derivatives on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value that is derived primarily from observable market data, including yield curves. Interest rate lock derivatives were classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Cash flows associated with qualifying hedge derivative instruments are presented in the same category on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as the item being hedged.
The fair value of interest rate lock derivatives was a liability of $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2019, and was included in Other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Aggregate changes in fair value, net of tax, of $1.6 billion and $868 million are presented in Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Between April 2 to April 6, 2020, in connection with the issuance of an aggregate of $19.0 billion in Senior Secured Notes bearing interest rates ranging from 3.500% to 4.500% and maturing in 2025 through 2050, we terminated our interest rate lock derivatives. See Note 8 - Debt for further information regarding the issuance of Senior Secured Notes. At the time of termination, the interest rate lock derivatives were a liability of $2.3 billion, of which $1.2 billion was cash-collateralized. The cash flows associated with the settlement of interest rate lock derivatives are presented on a gross basis in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, with the total cash payments to settle the swaps of $2.3 billion presented in changes in Other current and long-term liabilities within Net cash provided by operating activities and the return of cash collateral of $1.2 billion presented as an inflow in Net cash related to derivative contracts under collateral exchange arrangements within Net cash used in investing activities.
Upon the issuance of debt to which the hedged interest rate risk related, we began amortizing the Accumulated other comprehensive loss with the derivatives into Interest expense in a manner consistent with how the hedged interest payments affect earnings. For the year ended December 31, 2020, $128 million was amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into Interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. NaN amounts were amortized into Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. We expect to amortize $189 million of the Accumulated other comprehensive loss associated with the derivatives into Interest expense over the next 12 months.
Deferred Purchase Price Assets
In connection with the sales of certain service and EIP accounts receivable pursuant to the sale arrangements, we have deferred purchase price assets measured at fair value that are based on a discounted cash flow model using unobservable Level 3 inputs, including customer default rates. See Note 34 – Sales of Certain Receivables for further information.information.
The carrying amounts of our deferred purchase price assets, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, were $884 million and $781 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Fair value was equal to carrying amount at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Debt
The fair value of our Senior Unsecured Notes, Senior Secured Notes, and Secured Term Loan Facility to third parties was determined based on quoted market prices in active markets, and therefore were classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of our Senior Notes to affiliates and Incremental Term Loan Facility to affiliates were determined
based on a discounted cash flow approach using market interest rates of instruments with similar terms and maturities and an estimate for our standalone credit risk. Accordingly, our Senior Notes to affiliates and Incremental Term Loan Facility to affiliates were classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Although we have determined the estimated fair values using available market information and commonly accepted valuation methodologies, considerable judgment was required in interpreting market data to develop fair value estimates for the Senior Notes to affiliates and Incremental Term Loan Facility to affiliates. The fair value estimates were based on information available as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. As such, our estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amount we could realize in a current market exchange.
The carrying amounts and fair values of our short-term and long-term debt included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Level within the Fair Value Hierarchy | | December 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| (in millions) | | Carrying Amount (1) | | Fair Value (1) | | Carrying Amount (1) | | Fair Value (1) |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
| Senior Unsecured Notes to third parties | 1 | | $ | 29,966 | | | $ | 32,450 | | | $ | 10,958 | | | $ | 11,479 | |
| Senior Notes to affiliates | 2 | | 4,716 | | | 4,991 | | | 9,986 | | | 10,366 | |
| Senior Secured Notes to third parties | 1 | | 36,204 | | | 40,519 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Incremental Term Loan Facility to affiliates | 2 | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 4,000 | | | 4,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(1) Excludes $240 million and $25 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, in vendor financing arrangements and other debt as the carrying values approximate fair value primarily due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
Guarantee Liabilities
We offer certain device trade-in programs including JUMP!, whichthat provide eligible customers a specified-price trade-in right to upgrade their device. For customers who are enrolledenroll in these programs, we recognize a device trade-in program, we deferliability and reduce revenue for the portion of equipment revenuesrevenue which represents the estimated fair value of the specified-price trade-in right guarantee, incorporating the expected probability and timing of the handset upgrade and the estimated fair value of the used handset which is returned. Accordingly, our guarantee liabilities were classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. When customers upgrade their device,devices, the difference between the trade-inEIP balance credit to the customer and the fair value of the returned device is recorded against the guarantee liabilities. Guarantee liabilities are included in Other current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The carrying amounts of our guarantee liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. were $50 million and $62 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
The total estimated remaining gross EIP receivable balances of all enrolled handset upgrade program customers, which are the
remaining EIP amounts underlying the JUMP!trade-in right guarantee, including EIP receivables that have been sold, was $2.5$3.4 billion as of December 31, 2017.2020. This is not an indication of our expected loss exposure as it does not consider the expected fair value of the used handset or the probability and timing of the trade-in.
Note 78 – Debt
Debt was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| 3.360% Series 2016-1 A-1 Notes due 2021 | | | $ | 656 | | | $ | 0 | |
| 5.300% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2021 | | | 0 | | | 2,000 | |
| 7.250% Senior Notes due 2021 | | | 2,250 | | | 0 | |
| 11.500% Senior Notes due 2021 | | | 1,000 | | | 0 | |
| 4.000% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2022 | | | 1,000 | | | 1,000 | |
| 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 | | | 500 | | | 500 | |
| 6.000% Senior Notes due 2022 | | | 2,280 | | | 0 | |
| Incremental term loan facility to affiliates due 2022 | | | 0 | | | 2,000 | |
| 6.000% Senior Notes due 2023 | | | 1,300 | | | 1,300 | |
| 7.875% Senior Notes due 2023 | | | 4,250 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | |
| 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024 | | | 1,000 | | | 1,000 | |
| 6.000% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2024 | | | 0 | | | 1,350 | |
| 6.000% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2024 | | | 0 | | | 650 | |
| 6.500% Senior Notes due 2024 | | | 0 | | | 1,000 | |
| 7.125% Senior Notes due 2024 | | | 2,500 | | | 0 | |
| Incremental term loan facility to affiliates due 2024 | | | 0 | | | 2,000 | |
| 3.500% Senior Secured Notes due 2025 | | | 3,000 | | | 0 | |
| 4.738% Series 2018-1 A-1 Notes due 2025 | | | 2,100 | | | 0 | |
5.125% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2025 (1) | | | 0 | | | 1,250 | |
| 5.125% Senior Notes due 2025 | | | 500 | | | 500 | |
| 6.375% Senior Notes due 2025 | | | 0 | | | 1,700 | |
| 7.625% Senior Notes due 2025 | | | 1,500 | | | 0 | |
| 1.500% Senior Secured Notes due 2026 | | | 1,000 | | | 0 | |
| 6.500% Senior Notes due 2026 | | | 2,000 | | | 2,000 | |
| 4.500% Senior Notes due 2026 | | | 1,000 | | | 1,000 | |
| 4.500% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2026 | | | 1,000 | | | 1,000 | |
| 7.625% Senior Notes due 2026 | | | 1,500 | | | 0 | |
| 3.750% Senior Secured Notes due 2027 | | | 4,000 | | | 0 | |
| 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027 | | | 500 | | | 500 | |
5.375% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2027 (1) | | | 1,250 | | | 1,250 | |
| 2.050% Senior Secured Notes due 2028 | | | 1,750 | | | 0 | |
| 4.750% Senior Notes due 2028 | | | 1,500 | | | 1,500 | |
| 4.750% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2028 | | | 1,500 | | | 1,500 | |
| 5.152% Series 2018-1 A-2 Notes due 2028 | | | 1,838 | | | 0 | |
| 6.875% Senior Notes due 2028 | | | 2,475 | | | 0 | |
| 3.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2030 | | | 7,000 | | | 0 | |
| 2.250% Senior Secured Notes due 2031 | | | 1,000 | | | 0 | |
| 2.550% Senior Secured Notes due 2031 | | | 2,500 | | | 0 | |
| 8.750% Senior Notes due 2032 | | | 2,000 | | | 0 | |
| 4.375% Senior Secured Notes due 2040 | | | 2,000 | | | 0 | |
| 3.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2041 | | | 2,500 | | | 0 | |
| 4.500% Senior Secured Notes due 2050 | | | 3,000 | | | 0 | |
| 3.300% Senior Secured Notes due 2051 | | | 3,000 | | | 0 | |
| 3.600% Senior Secured Notes due 2060 | | | 1,000 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | |
| Other debt | | | 240 | | | 25 | |
| | | | | |
| Unamortized premium on debt to affiliates | | | 0 | | | 43 | |
| Unamortized premium on debt to third parties | | | 2,197 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | |
| Unamortized discount on debt to affiliates | | | (20) | | | (53) | |
| Unamortized discount on debt to third parties | | | (197) | | | 0 | |
| | | | | |
| Debt issuance costs and consent fees | | | (244) | | | (46) | |
| Total debt | | | 71,125 | | | 24,969 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Less: Current portion of Senior Notes and other debt to third parties | | | 4,579 | | | 25 | |
| Total long-term debt | | | $ | 66,546 | | | $ | 24,944 | |
| Classified on the balance sheet as: | | | | | |
| Long-term debt | | | $ | 61,830 | | | $ | 10,958 | |
| Long-term debt to affiliates | | | 4,716 | | | 13,986 | |
| Total long-term debt | | | $ | 66,546 | | | $ | 24,944 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| 5.250% Senior Notes due 2018 | $ | — |
| | $ | 500 |
|
| 6.464% Senior Notes due 2019 | — |
| | 1,250 |
|
| 6.288% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 2019 | — |
| | 1,250 |
|
| 6.542% Senior Notes due 2020 | — |
| | 1,250 |
|
| 6.625% Senior Notes due 2020 | — |
| | 1,000 |
|
| 6.366% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 2020 | — |
| | 1,250 |
|
| 6.250% Senior Notes due 2021 | — |
| | 1,750 |
|
| 6.633% Senior Notes due 2021 | — |
| | 1,250 |
|
| 5.300% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2021 | 2,000 |
| | — |
|
| 8.097% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 2021 | 1,250 |
| | 1,250 |
|
| 6.125% Senior Notes due 2022 | 1,000 |
| | 1,000 |
|
| 6.731% Senior Notes due 2022 | — |
| | 1,250 |
|
| 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 | 500 |
| | — |
|
| 4.000% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2022 | 1,000 |
| | — |
|
| 8.195% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 2022 | 1,250 |
| | 1,250 |
|
| Incremental term loan facility to affiliates due 2022 | 2,000 |
| | — |
|
| 6.000% Senior Notes due 2023 | 1,300 |
| | 1,300 |
|
| 6.625% Senior Notes due 2023 | 1,750 |
| | 1,750 |
|
| 6.836% Senior Notes due 2023 | 600 |
| | 600 |
|
| 9.332% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 2023 | 600 |
| | 600 |
|
| 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024 | 1,000 |
| | 1,000 |
|
| 6.500% Senior Notes due 2024 | 1,000 |
| | 1,000 |
|
| 6.000% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2024 | 1,350 |
| | — |
|
| 6.000% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2024 | 650 |
| | — |
|
| Incremental term loan facility to affiliates due 2024 | 2,000 |
| | — |
|
| 5.125% Senior Notes due 2025 | 500 |
| | — |
|
| 6.375% Senior Notes due 2025 | 1,700 |
| | 1,700 |
|
| 5.125% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2025 | 1,250 |
| | — |
|
| 6.500% Senior Notes due 2026 | 2,000 |
| | 2,000 |
|
| 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027 | 500 |
| | — |
|
| 5.375% Senior Notes to affiliates Due 2027 | 1,250 |
| | — |
|
| Senior Secured Term Loans | — |
| | 1,980 |
|
| Capital leases | 1,824 |
| | 1,425 |
|
| Unamortized premium from purchase price allocation fair value adjustment | 78 |
| | 212 |
|
| Unamortized premium on debt to affiliates | 59 |
| | — |
|
| Unamortized discount on Senior Secured Term Loans | — |
| | (8 | ) |
| Unamortized discount on affiliates Senior Notes | (73 | ) | | — |
|
| Debt issuance cost | (19 | ) | | (23 | ) |
| Total debt | 28,319 |
| | 27,786 |
|
| Less: Current portion of Senior Secured Term Loans | — |
| | 20 |
|
| Less: Current portion of Senior Notes | 999 |
| | — |
|
| Less: Current portion of capital leases | 613 |
| | 334 |
|
| Total long-term debt | $ | 26,707 |
| | $ | 27,432 |
|
| | | | |
| Classified on the balance sheet as: | | | |
| Long-term debt | $ | 12,121 |
| | $ | 21,832 |
|
| Long-term debt to affiliates | 14,586 |
| | 5,600 |
|
| Total long-term debt | $ | 26,707 |
| | $ | 27,432 |
|
Our effective interest rate, excluding the impact of derivatives and capitalized interest, was approximately 4.6% and 5.2% for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, on weighted average debt outstanding of $58.4 billion and $25.5 billion for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The weighted average debt outstanding was calculated by applying an average of the monthly ending balances of total short-term and long-term debt and short-term and long-term debt to affiliates, net of unamortized premiums, discounts, debt issuance costs and consent fees.
Debt to Third Parties
Issuances and Borrowings
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we issued the following Senior Notes:Secured Notes and entered into the following Secured loan facilities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Principal Issuances | | Premiums, Discounts and Issuance Costs | | Net Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Debt | | Issue Date |
| 3.500% Senior Secured Notes due 2025 | $ | 3,000 | | | $ | 12 | | | $ | 2,988 | | | April 9, 2020 |
| 3.750% Senior Secured Notes due 2027 | 4,000 | | | 17 | | | 3,983 | | | April 9, 2020 |
| 3.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2030 | 7,000 | | | 78 | | | 6,922 | | | April 9, 2020 |
| 4.375% Senior Secured Notes due 2040 | 2,000 | | | 47 | | | 1,953 | | | April 9, 2020 |
| 4.500% Senior Secured Notes due 2050 | 3,000 | | | 24 | | | 2,976 | | | April 9, 2020 |
| 1.500% Senior Secured Notes due 2026 | 1,000 | | | 5 | | | 995 | | | June 24, 2020 |
| 2.050% Senior Secured Notes due 2028 | 1,250 | | | 8 | | | 1,242 | | | June 24, 2020 |
| 2.550% Senior Secured Notes due 2031 | 1,750 | | | 12 | | | 1,738 | | | June 24, 2020 |
| 2.050% Senior Secured Notes due 2028 | 500 | | | (11) | | | 511 | | | October 6, 2020 |
| 2.550% Senior Secured Notes due 2031 | 750 | | | (29) | | | 779 | | | October 6, 2020 |
| 3.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2041 | 1,250 | | | 15 | | | 1,235 | | | October 6, 2020 |
| 3.300% Senior Secured Notes due 2051 | 1,500 | | | 16 | | | 1,484 | | | October 6, 2020 |
| 2.250% Senior Secured Notes due 2031 | 1,000 | | | 5 | | | 995 | | | October 28, 2020 |
| 3.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2041 | 1,250 | | | 38 | | | 1,212 | | | October 28, 2020 |
| 3.300% Senior Secured Notes due 2051 | 1,500 | | | 58 | | | 1,442 | | | October 28, 2020 |
| 3.600% Senior Secured Notes due 2060 | 1,000 | | | 11 | | | 989 | | | October 28, 2020 |
| Total of Senior Secured Notes issued | 31,750 | | | 306 | | | 31,444 | | | |
| Secured bridge loan facility due 2021 | 19,000 | | | 257 | | | 18,743 | | | April 1, 2020 |
| Secured term loan facility due 2027 | 4,000 | | | 107 | | | 3,893 | | | April 1, 2020 |
| | | | | | | |
| Total of Secured loan facilities issued | 23,000 | | | 364 | | | 22,636 | | | |
| Total Issuances and Borrowings | $ | 54,750 | | | $ | 670 | | | $ | 54,080 | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Principal Issuances | | Issuance Costs | | Net Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Debt |
| 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 | $ | 500 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 498 |
|
| 5.125% Senior Notes due 2025 | 500 |
| | 2 |
| | 498 |
|
| 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027 | 500 |
| | 1 |
| | 499 |
|
| Total of Senior Notes issued | $ | 1,500 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 1,495 |
|
Credit Facilities
In connection with the entry into the Business Combination Agreement, T-Mobile USA entered into the Commitment Letter, with certain financial institutions named therein that committed to provide up to $27.0 billion in secured debt financing through May 1, 2020, including a $4.0 billion secured revolving credit facility, a $4.0 billion secured term loan facility, and a $19.0 billion secured bridge loan facility. The funding of the debt facilities provided for in the Commitment Letter was subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth therein, including consummation of the Merger.
On March 16, 2017,April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issuedentered into a totalBridge Loan Credit Agreement with certain financial institutions named therein, providing for a $19.0 billion secured bridge loan facility (“New Secured Bridge Loan Facility”). The New Secured Bridge Loan Facility had an interest rate equal to a per annum rate of $1.5 billionLIBOR plus a margin of public Senior Notes with various interest rates1.25% and had a maturity dates. Issuance costs related to the public debt issuance totaled $5 million for the year ended Decemberdate of March 31, 2017. We used the net proceeds of $1.495 billion from the transaction to redeem callable high yield debt.2021.
On January 25, 2018,April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, (i) issued $1.0 billion of public 4.500% Senior Notes due 2026 and (ii) issued $1.5 billion of public 4.750% Senior Notes due 2028. We intend to use the net proceeds of $2.493 billion from the transaction to redeem up to $1.75 billion of 6.625% Senior Notes due 2023, and up to $600 million of 6.836% Senior Notes due 2023, with the balance to be used for general corporate purposes, including partial pay down of borrowings under our revolving credit facility with DT. Issuance costs related to the public debt issuance totaled approximately $7 million.
Notes Redemptions
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we made the following note redemptions:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Principal Amount | | Write-off of Premiums, Discounts and Issuance Costs (1) | | Call Penalties (1) (2) | | Redemption
Date | | Redemption Price |
| 6.625% Senior Notes due 2020 | $ | 1,000 |
| | $ | (45 | ) | | $ | 22 |
| | February 10, 2017 | | 102.208 | % |
| 5.250% Senior Notes due 2018 | 500 |
| | 1 |
| | 7 |
| | March 4, 2017 | | 101.313 | % |
| 6.250% Senior Notes due 2021 | 1,750 |
| | (71 | ) | | 55 |
| | April 1, 2017 | | 103.125 | % |
| 6.464% Senior Notes due 2019 | 1,250 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | April 28, 2017 | | 100.000 | % |
| 6.542% Senior Notes due 2020 | 1,250 |
| | — |
| | 21 |
| | April 28, 2017 | | 101.636 | % |
| 6.633% Senior Notes due 2021 | 1,250 |
| | — |
| | 41 |
| | April 28, 2017 | | 103.317 | % |
| 6.731% Senior Notes due 2022 | 1,250 |
| | — |
| | 42 |
| | April 28, 2017 | | 103.366 | % |
| Total note redemptions | $ | 8,250 |
| | $ | (115 | ) | | $ | 188 |
| | | | |
| |
(1) | Write-off of premiums, discounts, issuance costs and call penalties are included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Write-off of premiums, discounts and issuance costs are included in Other, net within Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. |
| |
(2) | The call penalty is the excess paid over the principal amount. Call penalties are included within Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. |
Prior to December 31, 2017, we delivered a notice of redemption on $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of our 6.125% Senior Notes due 2022. The notes were redeemed on January 15, 2018, at a redemption price equal to 103.063% of the principal amount of the notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon). The redemption premium was approximately $31 million and the write-off of issuance costs was approximately $1 million. The outstanding principal amount was reclassified from Long-term debt to Short-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017.
Debt to Affiliates
Issuances and Borrowings
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we made the following borrowings:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Net Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Debt | | Extinguishments | | Write-off of Discounts and Issuance Costs (1) |
| LIBOR plus 2.00% Senior Secured Term Loan due 2022 | $ | 2,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| LIBOR plus 2.00% Senior Secured Term Loan due 2024 | 2,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
LIBOR plus 2.750% Senior Secured Term Loan (2) | — |
| | (1,980 | ) | | 13 |
|
| Total | $ | 4,000 |
| | $ | (1,980 | ) | | $ | 13 |
|
| |
(1) | Write-off of discounts and issuance costs are included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and Other, net within Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. |
| |
(2) | Our Senior Secured Term Loan extinguished during the year endedDecember 31, 2017 was Third Party debt.
|
On January 25, 2017, T-Mobile USA, Inc. (“T-Mobile USA”), and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, entered into an agreement to borrowa Credit Agreement (the “New Credit Agreement”) with certain financial institutions named therein, providing for a $4.0 billion under a secured term loan facility (“IncrementalNew Secured Term Loan Facility”) with DT, our majority stockholder,and a $4.0 billion revolving credit facility (“New Revolving Credit Facility”). On September 16, 2020, we increased the aggregate commitment under the New Revolving Credit Facility to refinance $1.98$5.5 billion of outstanding senior secured term loans under its Term Loanthrough an amendment (the “Incremental Amendment”) to the New Credit Agreement dated November 9, 2015, with the remaining net proceeds from the transaction used to redeem callable high yield debt.Agreement. The IncrementalNew Secured Term Loan Facility increased DT’s incremental term loan commitment providedhad an interest rate equal to T-Mobile USA under that certain First Incrementala per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 3.00% and had a maturity
date of April 1, 2027. The New Revolving Credit Facility Amendment dated as of December 29, 2016, from $660 million to $2.0 billion and provided T-Mobile USA with an additional $2.0 billion incremental term loan commitment.
On January 31, 2017, the loans under the Incremental Term Loan Facility were drawn in two tranches: (i) $2.0 billion of which bears interest at a rate equal to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00%1.25% with the margin subject to a reduction to 1.00% if T-Mobile’s Total First Lien Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the New Credit Agreement) is less than or equal to 0.75 to 1.00. The commitments under the New Revolving Credit Facility mature on April 1, 2025. The New Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and maturescovenants, including a financial maintenance covenant of 3.3x with respect to T-Mobile’s Total First Lien Net Leverage Ratio commencing with the period ending September 30, 2020.
On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we drew down on November 9, 2022,our $19.0 billion New Secured Bridge Loan Facility and (ii)our $4.0 billion New Secured Term Loan Facility. We used the net proceeds of $22.6 billion from the drawdown of the secured facilities to repay our $4.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility with DT and to repurchase from DT $4.0 billion of indebtedness to affiliates, consisting of $2.0 billion of 5.300% Senior Notes due 2021 and $2.0 billion of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024, as well as to redeem certain debt of Sprint and Sprint’s subsidiaries, including the secured term loans due 2024 with a total principal amount outstanding of $5.9 billion, accounts receivable facility with a total amount outstanding of $2.3 billion, and Sprint’s 7.250% Guaranteed Notes due 2028 with a total principal amount outstanding of $1.0 billion, and for post-closing general corporate purposes of the combined company.
In connection with the financing provided for in the Commitment Letter, we incurred certain fees payable to the financial institutions, including certain financing fees on the secured term loan commitment and fees for structuring, funding, and providing the commitments. On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we paid $355 million in Commitment Letter fees to certain financial institutions.
On October 30, 2020, we entered into a $5.0 billion senior secured term loan commitment with certain financial institutions. Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on January 14, 2021, we issued an aggregate of $3.0 billion in Senior Notes. A portion of the senior secured term loan commitment was reduced by an amount equal to the aggregate gross proceeds of the Senior Notes, which bearsreduced the commitment to $2.0 billion. Up to $2.0 billion of loans under the commitment may be drawn at any time (subject to customary conditions precedent) through June 30, 2021. If drawn, the facility matures in 364 days with 1 six-month extension exercisable at our discretion. Proceeds may be used for general corporate purposes and will accrue interest at a rate equal to a per annum rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.25%1.25% per annum.
Senior Notes
On April 9, 2020, T-Mobile USA and maturescertain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued an aggregate of $19.0 billion in Senior Secured Notes bearing interest rates ranging from 3.500% to 4.500% and maturing in 2025 through 2050, and used the net proceeds of $18.8 billion together with cash on hand to repay all of the outstanding amounts under, and terminate, our $19.0 billion New Secured Bridge Loan Facility, as described above.
On June 24, 2020, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued an aggregate of $4.0 billion in Senior Secured Notes bearing interest rates ranging from 1.500% to 2.550% and maturing in 2026 through 2031. The Senior Secured Notes were issued for refinancing callable Senior Notes and, subsequent to the issuance, we redeemed certain Senior Notes as set forth below under “Senior Secured Notes – Redemptions and Repayments” and “Senior Notes to Affiliates.”
On October 6, 2020, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued an aggregate of $4.0 billion in Senior Secured Notes bearing interest rates ranging from 2.050% to 3.300% and maturing in 2028 through 2051. On October 9, 2020, we used the net proceeds of $4.0 billion to repay at par all of the outstanding amounts under, and terminate, our New Secured Term Loan Facility.
On October 28, 2020, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued an aggregate of $4.75 billion in Senior Secured Notes bearing interest rates ranging from 2.250% to 3.600% and maturing in 2031 through 2060. We intend to use the net proceeds of $4.6 billion for general corporate purposes, which may include among other things, acquisitions of additional spectrum and refinancing existing indebtedness on an ongoing basis.
The Senior Secured Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and may not be offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. persons except in accordance with an applicable exemption from the registration requirements thereof. Accordingly, the Senior Secured Notes were offered and sold only (1) to persons reasonably believed to be “qualified institutional buyers” under Rule 144A under the Securities Act and (2) outside the United States to non-U.S. persons in reliance upon Regulation S under the Securities Act.
The Senior Secured Notes are secured by a first priority security interest, subject to permitted liens, in substantially all of our present and future assets, other than certain excluded assets. They are redeemable at our discretion, in whole or in part, at any
time. If redeemed prior to their contractually specified Par Call Date, the redemption price is subject to a make-whole premium calculated by reference to then-current U.S. Treasury rates plus a fixed spread; if redeemed on or after their respective Par Call Date, the make-whole premium does not apply. The amount of time by which the Par Call Date precedes the maturity date of the respective note varies from one to six months.
We have entered into a Registration Rights Agreement that is in effect through the maturity of the applicable Senior Secured Notes. This agreement calls for us to use commercially reasonable efforts to file a registration statement and have it declared effective within a particular time period and to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement for a certain period of time. If a default occurs, we will pay additional interest up to a maximum increase of 0.50% per annum. We have not accrued any obligations associated with the Registration Rights Agreement as compliance with the agreements is considered probable.
Subsequent to December 31, 2020, on January 31, 2024. 14, 2021, T-Mobile USA issued $1.0 billion of 2.250% Senior Notes due 2026, $1.0 billion of 2.625% Senior Notes due 2029, and $1.0 billion of 2.875% Senior Notes due 2031. We intend to use the net proceeds of $3.0 billion for general corporate purposes, which may include among other things, financing acquisitions of additional spectrum and refinancing existing indebtedness on an ongoing basis.
Debt Assumed
In July 2017,connection with the Merger, we repricedassumed the $2.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility maturing on January 31, 2024,following indebtedness of Sprint:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | Fair value as of April 1, 2020 | | Principal Outstanding as of December 31, 2020 | | Carrying Value as of December 31, 2020 |
| | | | | | |
| 7.250% Senior Notes due 2021 | | $ | 2,324 | | | $ | 2,250 | | | $ | 2,287 | |
| 7.875% Senior Notes due 2023 | | 4,682 | | | 4,250 | | | 4,594 | |
| 7.125% Senior Notes due 2024 | | 2,746 | | | 2,500 | | | 2,706 | |
| 7.625% Senior Notes due 2025 | | 1,677 | | | 1,500 | | | 1,652 | |
| 7.625% Senior Notes due 2026 | | 1,701 | | | 1,500 | | | 1,679 | |
| | | | | | |
3.360% Senior Secured Series 2016-1 A-1 Notes due 2021 (1) | | 1,310 | | | 656 | | | 656 | |
4.738% Senior Secured Series 2018-1 A-1 Notes due 2025 (1) | | 2,153 | | | 2,100 | | | 2,145 | |
5.152% Senior Secured Series 2018-1 A-2 Notes due 2028 (1) | | 1,960 | | | 1,838 | | | 1,950 | |
| | | | | | |
| 7.000% Senior Notes due 2020 | | 1,510 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| 11.500% Senior Notes due 2021 | | 1,105 | | | 1,000 | | | 1,057 | |
| 6.000% Senior Notes due 2022 | | 2,372 | | | 2,280 | | | 2,346 | |
| | | | | | |
| 6.875% Senior Notes due 2028 | | 2,834 | | | 2,475 | | | 2,808 | |
| 8.750% Senior Notes due 2032 | | 2,649 | | | 2,000 | | | 2,620 | |
| Accounts receivable facility | | 2,310 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Other debt | | 464 | | | 256 | | | 240 | |
| Total Debt Assumed | | $ | 31,797 | | | $ | 24,605 | | | $ | 26,740 | |
(1)In connection with DTthe closing of the Merger, we assumed Sprint’s spectrum-backed notes, which are collateralized by reducing the interest rateacquired directly held and third-party leased Spectrum licenses. See “Spectrum Financing” section below for further information.
Redemptions and Repayments
On March 31, 2017, the Incremental Term Loan Facility was amended to waive all interim principal payments. The outstanding principal balance will be due at maturity.
During the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, we issuedrepaid the following loan facilities and redeemed the following Senior Notes held by third parties and Senior Notes held by affiliates:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Principal Amount | | Write-off of Premiums, Discounts and Issuance Costs (1) | | Other (2) | | Redemption or Repayment Date | | Redemption Price |
| 6.500% Senior Notes due 2024 | $ | 1,000 | | | $ | 12 | | | $ | 22 | | | July 4, 2020 | | 102.167 | % |
| 7.000% Senior Notes due 2020 | 1,500 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | August 15, 2020 | | N/A |
| 6.375% Senior Notes due 2025 | 1,700 | | | 24 | | | 36 | | September 1, 2020 | | 102.125 | % |
| Total Senior Notes to third parties redeemed | 4,200 | | | 36 | | | 58 | | | | | |
5.300% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2021 (3) | 2,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | April 1, 2020 | | 100.000 | % |
6.000% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2024 (3) | 1,350 | | (26) | | | 0 | | | April 1, 2020 | | 100.000 | % |
6.000% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2024 (3) | 650 | | (15) | | | 0 | | | April 1, 2020 | | 100.000 | % |
| 5.125% Senior Secured Notes to affiliates due 2025 | 1,250 | | | 15 | | | 0 | | | July 4, 2020 | | 100.000 | % |
| Total Senior Notes to affiliates redeemed | 5,250 | | | (26) | | | 0 | | | | | |
| Total Redemptions | $ | 9,450 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | 58 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Incremental term loan facility to affiliates due 2022 | $ | 2,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | April 1, 2020 | | 100.000 | % |
| Incremental term loan facility to affiliates due 2024 | 2,000 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | April 1, 2020 | | 100.000 | % |
| Accounts receivable facility | 2,310 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | April 1, 2020 | | 100.000 | % |
| Secured bridge loan facility due 2021 | 19,000 | | | 251 | | | (47) | | | April 9, 2020 | | 100.128 | % |
| 3.360% Senior Secured Series 2016-1 A-1 Notes due 2021 | 656 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | Various | | N/A |
| Secured term loan facility due 2027 | 4,000 | | | 100 | | | 0 | | | October 9, 2020 | | 100.000 | % |
| Other debt | 481 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | Various | | N/A |
| Total Repayments | $ | 30,447 | | | $ | 351 | | | $ | (47) | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
(1)Write-off of premiums, discounts and issuance costs are included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Write-off of issuance costs are included in Loss on redemption of debt within Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
(2)Primarily represents a reimbursement of a portion of the commitment letter fees that were paid to DT:financial institutions when we drew down on the Secured Bridge Loan Facility on April 1, 2020 and is included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
(3)Pursuant to the Financing Matters Agreement, the Senior Notes were effectively redeemed through a repurchase and were cancelled and retired in full on April 1, 2020. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Principal Issuances (Redemptions) | | Discounts (1) | | Net Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Debt |
| 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022 | $ | 1,000 |
| | $ | (23 | ) | | $ | 977 |
|
| 5.125% Senior Notes due 2025 | 1,250 |
| | (28 | ) | | 1,222 |
|
5.375% Senior Notes due 2027 (2) | 1,250 |
| | (28 | ) | | 1,222 |
|
| 6.288% Senior Reset Notes due 2019 | (1,250 | ) | | — |
| | (1,250 | ) |
| 6.366% Senior Reset Notes due 2020 | (1,250 | ) | | — |
| | (1,250 | ) |
| Total | $ | 1,000 |
| | $ | (79 | ) | | $ | 921 |
|
| |
(1) | Discounts reduce Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt and are included within Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. |
| |
(2) | In April 2017, we issued to DT $750 million in aggregate principal amount of the 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027, and in September 2017, we issued to DT the remaining $500 million in aggregate principal amount of the 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027. |
On April 9, 2020, we repaid all of the outstanding amounts under, and terminated,our $19.0 billion New Secured Bridge Loan Facility. Additionally, in connection with the repayment of our New Secured Bridge Loan Facility, we received a reimbursement of $71 million, which represents a portion of the Commitment Letter fees that were paid to certain financial institutions when we drew down on the New Secured Bridge Loan Facility on April 1, 2020. The reimbursement is presented in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
On March 13, 2017, DT agreed to purchase a total of $3.5July 4, 2020, we redeemed $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amounts of Senior Notes with various interest rates and maturity dates (the “new DT Notes”).
Through net settlement in April 2017, we issued to DT a total of $3.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of the new DTour 6.500% Senior Notes anddue 2024. The notes were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 102.167% of the $2.5 billion in outstanding aggregate principal amount of Senior Reset Notes with variousthe notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest ratesthereon), and maturity dates (the “old DT Notes”).
were paid on July 6, 2020. The redemption pricespremium was approximately $22 million and the write off of the old DT Notes were 103.144% and 103.183%, resulting in a total of $79 million in early redemption fees. These early redemption fees were recorded as discounts on the issuance of the new DT Notes.
In September 2017, we issued to DT $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027, which is the final tranche of the new DT Notes. We were not required to pay any underwriting fees or issuance costs in connection with the issuance of the notes.
Net proceeds from the issuance of the new DT Notesand consent fees was approximately $12 million, which were $921 million and are included in Proceeds from issuanceOther expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of long-termComprehensive Income and Losses on redemption of debt in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
On May 9, 2017,July 4, 2020, we exercised our option under existing purchase agreements and issued the following Senior Notes to DT:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Principal Issuances | | Premium | | Net Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Debt |
| 5.300% Senior Notes due 2021 | $ | 2,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,000 |
|
| 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024 | 1,350 |
| | 40 |
| | 1,390 |
|
| 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024 | 650 |
| | 24 |
| | 674 |
|
| Total | $ | 4,000 |
| | $ | 64 |
| | $ | 4,064 |
|
On January 22, 2018, DT agreed to purchase $1.0also redeemed $1.25 billion in aggregate principal amount of 4.500%our 5.125% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2026 and2021, as further described below under “Senior Notes to Affiliates.”
On August 15, 2020, we redeemed at maturity $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of 4.750%our 7.000% Senior Notes due 2028 directly from T-Mobile USA2020 (plus accrued and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, with no underwriting discount (the “DT Notes”)unpaid interest thereon).
DT has agreed that the payment for the DT notes will be made by delivery of $1.25On September 1, 2020, we redeemed $1.7 billion in aggregate principal amount of 8.097%our 6.375% Senior Reset Notes due 2021 and $1.25 billion in aggregate2025. The notes were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 102.125% of the principal amount of 8.195% Senior Resetthe notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon), and were paid on September 1, 2020. The redemption premium was approximately $36 million and the write off of
issuance costs and consent fees was approximately $24 million, which were included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
On October 9, 2020, we repaid at par all of the outstanding amounts under, and terminated, our New Secured Term Loan Facility. The write off of discounts and issuance costs was approximately $100 million, which were included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Financing Matters Agreement
Pursuant to the Financing Matters Agreement, DT agreed, among other things, to consent to the incurrence by DT and which T-Mobile USA will have called for redemption,of secured debt in exchange forconnection with and after the DT notes.consummation of the Merger, and to provide a lock up on sales thereby as to certain Senior Notes of T-Mobile USA held thereby. In connection with such exchange,receiving the requisite consents, we will pay DT in cash the premium portion of the redemption price set forth in the indenture governing the DT Senior Reset Notes, plus accrued but unpaid interest on the DT Senior Reset Notes to, but not including, the exchange date.
The closing of the issuance and sale of the DT notesmade upfront payments to DT and exchange of $7 million during the DT Senior Reset Notes, is expectedsecond quarter of 2018. These payments were recognized as a reduction to occur on or about April 30, 2018.
Capital Leases
Capital lease agreements primarily relateLong-term debt to network equipment with varying expiration terms through 2031. Future minimum payments required under capital leases, including interest and maintenance, over their remaining terms are summarized below:
|
| | | |
| (in millions) | Future Minimum Payments |
| Year Ended December 31, | |
| 2018 | $ | 682 |
|
| 2019 | 634 |
|
| 2020 | 338 |
|
| 2021 | 151 |
|
| 2022 | 67 |
|
| Thereafter | 172 |
|
| Total | $ | 2,044 |
|
| Included in Total | |
| Interest | $ | 169 |
|
| Maintenance | 51 |
|
Financing Arrangements
We maintain a handset financing arrangement with Deutsche Bank AG (“Deutsche Bank”), which allows for up to $108 million in borrowings. Under the handset financing arrangement, we can effectively extend payment terms for invoices payable to certain handset vendors. The interest rate on the handset financing arrangement is determined based on LIBOR plus a specified margin per the arrangement. Obligations under the handset financing arrangement are included in Short-term debtaffiliates in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In 2016, we utilized and repaid $100 million underOn April 1, 2020, in connection with the financing arrangement. Asclosing of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there was no outstanding balance.the Merger, we:
We maintain vendor financing arrangements•Repaid our $4.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility with our primary network equipment suppliers. Under the respective agreements, we can obtain extended financing terms. The interest rate on the vendor financing arrangements is determined based on the difference between LIBORDT, consisting of a $2.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility due 2022 and a specified margin per$2.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility due 2024;
•Terminated our revolving credit facility;
•Repurchased from DT $4.0 billion of indebtedness to affiliates, consisting of $2.0 billion of 5.300% Senior Notes due 2021 and $2.0 billion of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024;
•Amended the agreements. Obligations under$1.25 billion of 5.125% Senior Notes due 2025 and $1.25 billion of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027, which represent indebtedness to affiliates, to change the vendor financing arrangements are included in Short-termmaturity dates thereof to April 15, 2021 and April 15, 2022, respectively (the “2025 and 2027 Amendments”); and
•Made an additional payment for requisite consents to DT of $13 million. These payments were recognized as a reduction to Long-term debt to affiliates in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In 2017, we utilized and repaid $300 million underaccordance with the financing arrangement. As ofconsents received from DT, on December 31, 2017 and 2016, there was no outstanding balance.
Revolving Credit Facility and Standby Letters of Credit
We had an unsecured revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom which allowed for up to $500 million in borrowings. In December 2016, we terminated our $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom.
In December 2016,20, 2018, T-Mobile USA, entered into a $2.5the guarantors and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, executed and delivered the 38th supplemental indenture to the Indenture, pursuant to which, with respect to certain T-Mobile USA Senior Notes held by DT, the Debt Amendments (as defined below under “Consents on Debt to Third Parties”) and the 2025 and 2027 Amendments became effective immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger.
Senior Notes to Affiliates
On July 4, 2020, we redeemed $1.25 billion revolving credit facility with Deutsche Telekom which comprised of (i) a three-year $1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit agreement and (ii) a three-year $1.5 billion secured revolving credit agreement. The applicable margin for the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility ranges from 2.00% to 3.25% per annum for Eurodollar Rate loans. The applicable margin for the Secured Revolving Credit Facility ranges from 1.00% to 1.75% per annum for Eurodollar Rate loans. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.
In January 2018, we utilized proceeds under the revolving credit facility to redeem $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of our 6.125%5.125% Senior Notes to affiliates due 20222021. The notes were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 100.00% of the principal amount of the notes (plus accrued and for general corporate purposes. Asunpaid interest thereon), and were paid on July 6, 2020. The write off of February 5, 2018, there were no outstanding borrowingsdiscounts was approximately $15 million and was included in Other expense, net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and Losses on the revolving credit facility. The Proceeds and borrowings from the revolving credit facility are presented in Proceeds from borrowing on revolving credit facility and Repaymentsredemption of revolving credit facility within Net cash (used in) provided by financing activitiesdebt in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Consents on Debt to Third Parties
On May 18, 2018, under the terms and conditions described in the Consent Solicitation Statement, we obtained consents necessary to effect certain amendments to our Senior Notes to third parties in connection with the Business Combination Agreement. Pursuant to the Consent Solicitation Statement, third-party note holders agreed, among other things, to consent to increasing the amount of Secured Indebtedness under credit facilities that can be incurred from the greater of $9.0 billion and 150% of Consolidated Cash Flow to the greater of $9.0 billion and an amount that would not cause the Secured Debt to Cash Flow Ratio (calculated net of cash and cash equivalents) to exceed 2.00x (the “Ratio Secured Debt Amendments”) and in each case as such capitalized term is defined in the Indenture. In connection with receiving the requisite consents for the Ratio Secured Debt Amendments, we made upfront payments to third-party note holders of $17 million during the second quarter of 2018. These payments were recognized as a reduction to Long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These upfront payments increased the effective interest rate of the related debt.
In addition, note holders agreed, among other things, to allow certain entities related to Sprint’s existing spectrum securitization notes program (“Existing Sprint Spectrum Program”) to be non-guarantor Restricted Subsidiaries, provided that the principal amount of the spectrum notes issued and outstanding under the Existing Sprint Spectrum Program does not exceed $7.0 billion and that the principal amount of such spectrum notes reduces the amount available under the credit facilities ratio basket, and to
revise the definition of GAAP to mean generally accepted accounting principles in effect from time to time, unless the Company elects to “freeze” GAAP as of any date, and to exclude the effect of the changes in the accounting treatment of lease obligations (the “Existing Sprint Spectrum and GAAP Amendments,” and together with the Ratio Secured Debt Amendments, the “Debt Amendments”). In connection with receiving the requisite consents for the Existing Sprint Spectrum and GAAP Amendments, we made upfront payments to third-party note holders of $14 million during the second quarter of 2018. These payments were recognized as a reduction to Long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These upfront payments increased the effective interest rate of the related debt.
In connection with obtaining the requisite consents, on May 20, 2018, T-Mobile USA, the guarantors and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, executed and delivered the 37th supplemental indenture to the Indenture, pursuant to which, with respect to each of our Senior Notes to third parties, all the amendments mentioned above (collectively, the “Debt Amendments”) would become effective immediately prior to the consummation of the Merger.
We paid third-party bank fees associated with obtaining the requisite consents related to the Debt Amendments of $6 million during the second quarter of 2018, which we recognized as Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we made additional payments to third-party note holders for requisite consents related to the Ratio Secured Debt Amendments of $54 million and related to the Existing Sprint Spectrum and GAAP Amendments of $41 million. These payments were recognized as a reduction to Long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These payments increased the effective interest rate of the related debt.
Spectrum Financing
On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we assumed Sprint’s spectrum-backed notes, which are collateralized by the acquired directly held and third-party leased Spectrum licenses (collectively, the “Spectrum Portfolio“) transferred to wholly owned bankruptcy-remote special purpose entities (collectively, the “Spectrum Financing SPEs”). As of December 31, 2020, the total outstanding obligations under these Notes was $4.6 billion.
In October 2016, certain subsidiaries of Sprint Communications, Inc. transferred the Spectrum Portfolio to the Spectrum Financing SPEs, which was used as collateral to raise an initial $3.5 billion in senior secured notes (the “2016 Spectrum-Backed Notes”) bearing interest at 3.360% per annum under a $7.0 billion securitization program. The 2016 Spectrum-Backed Notes are repayable over a five-year term, with interest-only payments over the first four quarters and amortizing quarterly principal payments thereafter commencing December 2017 through September 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we made scheduled principal repayments of $656 million, resulting in a total principal amount outstanding related to the 2016 Spectrum-Backed Notes of $656 million as of December 31, 2020, which was classified as Short-term debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In March 2018, Sprint issued approximately $3.9 billion in aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes (the “2018 Spectrum-Backed Notes” and together with the 2016 Spectrum-Backed Notes, the “Spectrum-Backed Notes”) under the existing $7.0 billion securitization program, consisting of 2 series of senior secured notes. The first series of notes totaled $2.1 billion in aggregate principal amount, bears interest at 4.738% per annum, and has quarterly interest-only payments until June 2021, and amortizing quarterly principal amounts thereafter commencing in June 2021 through March 2025. As of December 31, 2020, $394 million of the aggregate principal amount was classified as Short-term debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The second series of notes totaled approximately $1.8 billion in aggregate principal amount, bears interest at 5.152% per annum, and has quarterly interest-only payments until June 2023, and amortizing quarterly principal amounts thereafter commencing in June 2023 through March 2028. The Spectrum Portfolio, which also serves as collateral for the Spectrum-Backed Notes, remains substantially identical to the original portfolio from October 2016.
Simultaneously with the October 2016 offering, Sprint Communications, Inc. entered a long-term lease with the Spectrum Financing SPEs for the ongoing use of the Spectrum Portfolio. Sprint Communications, Inc. is required to make monthly lease payments to the Spectrum Financing SPEs in an aggregate amount that is market-based relative to the spectrum usage rights as of the closing date and equal to $165 million per month. The lease payments, which are guaranteed by T-Mobile subsidiaries, are sufficient to service all outstanding series of the 2016 Spectrum Backed Notes and the lease also constitutes collateral for the senior secured notes. Because the Spectrum Financing SPEs are wholly owned T-Mobile subsidiaries, these entities are consolidated and all intercompany activity has been eliminated.
Each Spectrum Financing SPE is a separate legal entity with its own separate creditors who will be entitled, prior to and upon the liquidation of the respective Spectrum Financing SPE, to be satisfied out of the Spectrum Financing SPE’s assets prior to any assets of such Spectrum Financing SPE becoming available to T-Mobile. Accordingly, the assets of each Spectrum
Financing SPE are not available to satisfy the debts and other obligations owed to other creditors of T-Mobile until the obligations of such Spectrum Financing SPE under the spectrum-backed senior secured notes are paid in full. Certain provisions of the Spectrum Financing facility require us to maintain specified cash collateral balances. Amounts associated with these balances are considered to be restricted cash.
Restricted Cash
Certain provisions of our debt agreements require us to maintain specified cash collateral balances. Amounts associated with these balances are considered to be restricted cash.
Standby Letters of Credit
For the purposes of securing our obligations to provide handsetdevice insurance services we maintain an agreementand for standby letters of credit with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JP Morgan Chase”). For purposes of securing our general purpose obligations, we maintain a letterstandby letters of credit reimbursement agreement with Deutsche Bank.
The following table summarizescertain financial institutions. We assumed certain of Sprint’s standby letters of credit in the Merger. Our outstanding standby letters of credit under each agreement:were $555 million and $113 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. |
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| JP Morgan Chase | $ | 20 |
| | $ | 20 |
|
| Deutsche Bank | 59 |
| | 54 |
|
| Total outstanding balance | $ | 79 |
| | $ | 74 |
|
Note 8 -9 – Tower Obligations
Existing CCI Tower Lease Arrangements
In 2012, we conveyed to Crown Castle International Corp. (“CCI”) the exclusive right to manage and operate approximately 7,100 T-Mobile-owned wireless communication tower sites (“CCI TowerLease Sites”) in exchange for net proceeds of $2.5 billion (“2012 Tower Transaction”). Rights to approximately 6,200 of the tower sites were transferred to CCI via a Master Prepaid Leasemaster prepaid lease with site lease terms ranging from 23 to 37 years (“CCI Lease Sites”), while the remaining tower sites were sold to CCI (“CCI Sales Sites”(the “2012 Tower Transaction”). CCI has fixed-price purchase options for these towersthe CCI Lease Sites totaling approximately $2.0 billion, based on the estimated fair market valueexercisable at the end of the lease term. We lease back a portion of the space at certain tower sites for an initial term of ten10 years, followed by optional renewals at customary terms.
In 2015, we conveyed to Phoenix Tower International (“PTI”) the exclusive right to manage and operate approximately 600 T-Mobile-owned wireless communication tower sites (“PTI Tower Sites”) in exchange for net proceeds of approximately $140 million (“2015 Tower Transaction”). As of December 31, 2017, rights to approximately 200 of the tower sites remain operated
by PTI under a management agreement (“PTI Managed Sites”). We lease back space at certain tower sites for an initial term of ten years, followed by optional renewals at customary terms.
Assets and liabilities associated with the operation of certain of the tower sites were transferred to SPEs.special purpose entities (“SPEs”). Assets included ground lease agreements or deeds for the land on which the towers are situated, the towers themselves and existing subleasing agreements with other mobile network operator tenants whothat lease space at the tower sites. Liabilities included the obligation to pay ground lease rentals, property taxes and other executory costs. Upon closing of the 2012 Tower Transaction, CCI acquired all of the equity interests in the SPEs containing CCI Sales Sites and an option to acquire the CCI Lease Sites at the end of their respective lease terms and entered into a master lease agreement under which we agreed to lease back space at certain of the tower sites. Upon closing of the 2015 Tower Transaction, PTI acquired all of the equity interests in the SPEs containing PTI Sales Sites and entered into a master lease agreement under which we agreed to lease back space at certain of the tower sites.
We determined the SPEs containing the CCI Lease Sites (“Lease Site SPEs”) are VIEs as they lack sufficient equity to finance their activities. We have a variable interest in the Company's equity investment lacksLease Site VIE but are not the primary beneficiary as we lack the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the Lease Site VIE’s economic performance of the VIEs.performance. These activities include managing tenants and underlying ground leases, performing repair and maintenance on the towers, the obligation to absorb expected losses and the right to receive the expected future residual returns from the purchase option to acquire the CCI Lease Sites. As we determined that we are not the primary beneficiary and do not have a controlling financial interest in the Lease Site SPEs, the balances and operating results of the Lease Site SPEs are not included in our consolidated financial statements.
Due to our continuing involvement withHowever, we also considered if this arrangement resulted in the sale of the CCI Lease Sites for which we would de-recognize the tower sites,assets. By assessing whether control had transferred, we determinedconcluded that transfer of control criteria, as discussed in the revenue standard, were not met. Accordingly, we were precluded from applying sale-leaseback accounting.recorded this arrangement as a financing whereby we recorded debt, a financial obligation, and the CCI Lease Sites tower assets remained on our balance sheet. We recorded long-term financial obligations in the amount of the net proceeds received and recognizedrecognize interest on the tower obligations at a rate of approximately 8% for the 2012 Tower Transaction and 5% for the 2015 Tower Transaction using the effective interest method. The tower obligations are increased by interest expense and amortized through contractual leaseback payments made by us to CCI or PTI and through estimated future net cash flows generated and retained by CCI or PTI from operation of the tower sites. Our historical
Acquired CCI Tower Lease Arrangements
Prior to the Merger, Sprint entered into a lease-out and leaseback arrangement with Global Signal Inc., a third party that was subsequently acquired by CCI, that conveyed to CCI the exclusive right to manage and operate approximately 6,400 tower site asset costs continuesites (“Master Lease Sites”) via a master prepaid lease. These agreements were assumed upon the close of the Merger, at which point the remaining term of the lease-out was approximately 17 years with no renewal options. CCI has a fixed price purchase option for all (but not less than all) of the leased or subleased sites for approximately $2.3 billion, exercisable one year prior to bethe
expiration of the agreement and ending 120 days prior to the expiration of the agreement. We lease back a portion of the space at certain tower sites for an initial term of 10 years, followed by optional renewals at customary terms.
We considered if this arrangement resulted in the sale of the Master Lease Sites for which we would de-recognize the tower assets. By assessing whether control had transferred, we concluded that transfer of control criteria, as discussed in the revenue standard, were not met. Accordingly, we recorded this arrangement as a financing whereby we recorded debt, a financial obligation, and the Master Lease Sites tower assets remained on our balance sheet.
As of the Merger date, we recognized Property and equipment with a fair value of $2.8 billion and tower obligations related to amounts owed to CCI under the leaseback of $1.1 billion. Additionally, we recognized $1.7 billion in Other long-term liabilities associated with contract terms that are unfavorable to current market rates, which includes unfavorable terms associated with the fixed-price purchase option in 2037.
We recognize interest expense on the tower obligations at a rate of approximately 6% using the effective interest method. The tower obligations are increased by interest expense and amortized through contractual leaseback payments made by us to CCI. The tower assets are reported in Property and equipment, net in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are depreciated.depreciated to their estimated residual values over the expected useful life of the tower, which is 20 years.
The following table summarizes the impacts tobalances associated with both of the tower arrangements in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| Property and equipment, net | $ | 2,838 | | | $ | 198 | |
| Tower obligations | 3,028 | | | 2,236 | |
| Other long-term liabilities | 1,712 | | | 0 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Property and equipment, net | $ | 402 |
| | $ | 485 |
|
| Long-term financial obligation | 2,590 |
| | 2,621 |
|
Future minimum payments related to the tower obligations are expected to be approximately $189$397 million in 2018, $379for the year ending December 31, 2021, $716 million in total for 2019the years ending December 31, 2022 and 2020, $3812023, $598 million in total for 2021years ending December 31, 2024 and 20222025, and $1.0 billion$624 million in total for years thereafter.
Note 1310 – CommitmentsRevenue from Contracts with Customers
Disaggregation of Revenue
We provide wireless communications services to three primary categories of customers:
•Postpaid customers generally include customers who are qualified to pay after receiving wireless communications services utilizing phones, wearables, DIGITS, or other connected devices which includes tablets and ContingenciesSyncUP products. Our postpaid customers include customers of T-Mobile;
•Prepaid customers generally include customers who pay for further information.wireless communications services in advance. Our prepaid customers include customers of T-Mobile and Metro by T-Mobile; and
•Wholesale customers include Machine-to-Machine and Mobile Virtual Network Operator customers that operate on our network but are managed by wholesale partners.
Postpaid service revenues, including postpaid phone revenues and postpaid other revenues, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Postpaid service revenues | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Postpaid phone revenues | | | | | $ | 33,939 | | | $ | 21,329 | | | $ | 19,745 | |
| Postpaid other revenues | | | | | 2,367 | | | 1,344 | | | 1,117 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total postpaid service revenues | | | | | $ | 36,306 | | | $ | 22,673 | | | $ | 20,862 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
We operate as a single operating segment. The balances presented within each revenue line item in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income represent categories of revenue from contracts with customers disaggregated by type of product and service. Service revenues also include revenues earned for providing value added services to customers, such as device insurance services. Revenue generated from the lease of mobile communication devices is included within Equipment revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
We provide wireline communication services to domestic and international customers. Wireline service revenues of $626 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, relate to the wireline operations acquired in the Merger and are presented in Roaming and other service revenues in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Equipment revenues from the lease of mobile communication devices were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Equipment revenues from the lease of mobile communication devices | | | | | $ | 4,181 | | | $ | 599 | | | $ | 692 | |
Contract Balances
The opening and closing balances of our contract asset and contract liability balances from contracts with customers as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2020, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Contract Assets | | Contract Liabilities | | |
| | | | | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2019 | $ | 63 | | | $ | 560 | | | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2020 | 278 | | | 824 | | | |
| | | | | |
| Change | $ | 215 | | | $ | 264 | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Contract assets primarily represent revenue recognized for equipment sales with promotional bill credits offered to customers that are paid over time and are contingent on the customer maintaining a service contract. Through the Merger, we acquired contracts assets associated with promotional bill credits and subsidized devices with a value of $154 million as of April 1, 2020.
The change in the existing and acquired contract asset balance includes customer activity related to new promotions, offset by billings on existing contracts and impairment which is recognized as bad debt expense. The current portion of our Contract assets of approximately $204 million and $50 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, was included in Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Contract liabilities are recorded when fees are collected, or we have an unconditional right to consideration (a receivable) in advance of delivery of goods or services. Through the Merger, we assumed contract liabilities with a value of $336 million as of April 1, 2020. Additional changes in contract liabilities are primarily related to the volume and rate plans of active prepaid customers. Contract liabilities are primarily included in Deferred revenuein our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Revenues for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, include the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Amounts included in the beginning of year contract liability balance | | | | | $ | 545 | | | $ | 643 | |
Remaining Performance Obligations
As of December 31, 2020, the aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to remaining service performance obligations for postpaid contracts with subsidized devices and promotional bill credits that result in an extended service contract is $1.5 billion. We expect to recognize revenue as service is provided on these postpaid contracts over an extended contract term of 24 months. Transaction price allocated to remaining service performance obligations associated with subsidized devices and promotional bill credits acquired through the Merger at April 1, 2020, was $1.0 billion.
Through the Merger, on April 1, 2020, we acquired contracts associated with lease promotional credits with aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to remaining service and lease performance obligations of $4.8 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, the aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to remaining service and lease
performance obligations associated with operating leases was $2.1 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively. We expect to recognize this revenue as service is provided over the lease contract term of 18 months.
Information about remaining performance obligations that are part of a contract that has an original expected duration of one year or less have been excluded from the above, which primarily consists of monthly service contracts.
Certain of our wholesale, roaming and other service contracts include variable consideration based on usage. This variable consideration has been excluded from the disclosure of remaining performance obligations. As of December 31, 2020, the aggregate amount of the contractual minimum consideration for wholesale, roaming and other service contracts is $1.3 billion, $1.1 billion and $317 million for 2021, 2022, and 2023 and beyond, respectively. These contracts have a remaining duration ranging from less than one year to nine years.
Contract Costs
The total balance of deferred incremental costs to obtain contracts was $1.1 billion and $906 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and is included in Other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Deferred contract costs incurred to obtain postpaid service contracts are amortized over a period of 24 months. The amortization period is monitored to reflect any significant change in assumptions. Amortization of deferred contract costs is included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and was $865 million and $604 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Immediately preceding the close of the Merger, Sprint had deferred costs to obtain postpaid contracts of approximately $1.7 billion. This balance was adjusted to zero as part of our purchase price allocation. Contract costs capitalized for new postpaid contracts will accumulate in Other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets from the Merger close date. As a result, there was a net benefit to Operating income in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income during the year ended December 31, 2020, as capitalization of costs exceed amortization. As capitalized costs amortize into expense over time, the accretive benefit to Operating income is expected to moderate in 2021 and normalize in 2022.
The deferred contract cost asset is assessed for impairment on a periodic basis. There were 0 impairment losses recognized on deferred contract cost assets for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Note 911 – Employee Compensation and Benefit Plans
Under our 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the Sprint Corporation Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan that T-Mobile assumed in connection with the closing of the Merger, as described below (the “Incentive Plan”Plans”), we are authorized to issue up to 63101 million shares of our common stock. Under theour Incentive Plan,Plans, we can grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and performance awards to eligible employees, consultants, advisors and non-employee directors. As of December 31, 2017,2020, there were 15approximately 25 million shares of common stock available for future grants under theour Incentive Plan.Plans.
In January 2018, we closed on our previously announced acquisition of Layer3 TV, Inc. (“Layer3 TV”). Upon closing, the Layer3 TV 2013 Stock Plan and stock restriction agreements between Layer3 and certain employees were added to the Registration Statement related to the Incentive Plan. See Note 15 - Subsequent Events for further information regarding the Layer3 TV acquisitions.
We grant RSUs to eligible employees, key executives and certain non-employee directors and performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) to eligible key executives. RSUs entitle the grantee to receive shares of our common stock at the end ofupon vesting (with vesting generally occurring annually over a vesting period of generally up to 3 years,three-year period), subject to continued service through the applicable vesting date. PRSUs entitle the holder to receive shares of our common stock at the end of a vestingperformance period of generally up to 3three years if the applicable performance goals are achieved and generally subject to continued employmentservice through the vestingapplicable performance period. The number of shares ultimately
received by the holder of PRSUs is dependent on our business performance against the specified performance goal(s) over a pre-established performance period. We also maintain an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”), under which eligible employees can purchase our common stock at a discounted price.
Stock-based compensation expense and related income tax benefits were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As of and for the Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions, except shares, per share and contractual life amounts) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Stock-based compensation expense | | | | | $ | 694 | | | $ | 495 | | | $ | 424 | |
| Income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation | | | | | $ | 132 | | | $ | 92 | | | $ | 81 | |
| Weighted average fair value per stock award granted | | | | | $ | 96.27 | | | $ | 73.25 | | | $ | 61.52 | |
| Unrecognized compensation expense | | | | | $ | 592 | | | $ | 515 | | | $ | 547 | |
| Weighted average period to be recognized (years) | | | | | 1.9 | | 1.6 | | 1.8 |
| Fair value of stock awards vested | | | | | $ | 1,315 | | | $ | 512 | | | $ | 471 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except shares, per share and contractual life amounts) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| Stock-based compensation expense | $ | 306 |
| | $ | 235 |
| | $ | 201 |
|
| Income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation | 73 |
| | 80 |
| | 71 |
|
| Realized excess tax benefit | — |
| | — |
| | 79 |
|
| Weighted average fair value per stock award granted | 60.21 |
| | 45.07 |
| | 35.56 |
|
| Unrecognized compensation expense | 445 |
| | 389 |
| | 327 |
|
| Weighted average period to be recognized (years) | 1.9 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 2.0 |
|
| Fair value of stock awards vested | 503 |
| | 354 |
| | 445 |
|
Stock Awards
On April 1, 2020, we closed the Merger to combine T-Mobile and Sprint pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement. Pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, upon the completion of the Merger, T-Mobile assumed Sprint’s stock compensation plans. In addition, pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, at the Effective Time, each outstanding option to purchase Sprint common stock (other than under Sprint’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan), each award of time-based RSUs in respect of shares of Sprint common stock and each award of performance-based RSUs in respect of shares of Sprint common stock, in each case, that was outstanding as of immediately prior to the Effective Time was automatically adjusted by the Exchange Ratio (as defined in the Business Combination Agreement) and converted into an equity award of the same type covering shares of T-Mobile common stock, on the same terms and conditions, (including, if applicable, any continuing vesting requirements (but excluding any performance-based vesting conditions)) under the applicable Sprint plan and award agreement in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time (the “Assumed Awards”). The applicable amount of performance-based RSUs eligible for conversion was based on formulas and approximated 100% of target. Any accrued but unpaid dividend equivalents with respect to any such award of time-based RSUs or performance-based RSUs were assumed by T-Mobile at the Effective Time and became an obligation with respect to the applicable award of RSUs in respect of shares of T-Mobile common stock.
On April 22, 2020, we filed a Form S-8 to register a total of 25,304,224 shares of common stock, representing those covered by the Sprint Corporation 1997 Long-Term Stock Incentive Program, the Sprint Corporation 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the Sprint Corporation Amended and Restated 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) that T-Mobile assumed in connection with the closing of the Merger. This included 7,043,843 shares of T-Mobile common stock issuable upon exercise or settlement of the Assumed Awards held by current directors, officers, employees and consultants of T-Mobile or its subsidiaries who were directors, officers, employees and consultants of Sprint or its subsidiaries immediately prior to the Effective Time, as well as (i) 12,420,945 shares of T-Mobile common stock that remain available for issuance under the 2015 Plan and (ii) 5,839,436 additional shares of T-Mobile common stock subject to awards granted under the 2015 Plan that may become available for issuance under the 2015 Plan if any awards under the 2015 Plan are forfeited, lapse unexercised or are settled in cash.
Time-Based Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Awards
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except shares, per share and contractual life amounts) | Number of Units or Awards | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
| | | | | | | |
| Nonvested, December 31, 2019 | 10,503,211 | | | $ | 67.31 | | | 0.9 | | $ | 824 | |
| Assumed through acquisition | 1,852,527 | | | 83.90 | | | | | |
| Granted | 5,891,303 | | | 97.18 | | | | | |
| Vested | (7,112,552) | | | 69.32 | | | | | |
| Forfeited | (1,033,267) | | | 84.52 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Nonvested, December 31, 2020 | 10,101,222 | | | 84.61 | | | 0.9 | | 1,362 | |
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock Awards
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except shares, per share and contractual life amounts) | Number of Units or Awards | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
| | | | | | | |
| Nonvested, December 31, 2019 | 3,803,539 | | | $ | 69.78 | | | 1.0 | | $ | 300 | |
| Assumed through acquisition | 3,535,384 | | | 83.90 | | | | | |
| Granted | 1,212,522 | | | 110.38 | | | | | |
Performance award achievement adjustments (1) | 887,528 | | | 70.96 | | | | | |
| Vested | (6,127,838) | | | 77.11 | | | | | |
| Forfeited | (138,034) | | | 83.90 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Nonvested, December 31, 2020 | 3,173,101 | | | 86.58 | | | 1.0 | | 428 | |
PRSUs included in the table above are shown at target. Share payout can range from 0% to 200% based on different performance outcomes. Weighted average grant date fair value of RSU and PRSU Awardsassumed through acquisition is based on the fair value on the date assumed.
(1)Represents PRSUs granted prior to 2020 for which the performance achievement period was completed in 2020, resulting in incremental unit awards. These PRSU awards are also included in the amount vested in 2020.
The following activity occurred under the RSU and PRSU awards:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except shares, per share and contractual life amounts) | Number of Units(1) | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
| Nonvested, December 31, 2016 | 15,715,391 |
| | $ | 37.93 |
| | 1.1 | | $ | 904 |
|
| Granted | 7,133,359 |
| | 60.21 |
| | | | |
| Vested | (8,338,271 | ) | | 35.47 |
| | | | |
| Forfeited | (814,936 | ) | | 49.02 |
| | | | |
| Nonvested, December 31, 2017 | 13,695,543 |
| | 50.38 |
| | 1.1 | | 870 |
|
| |
(1) | PRSUs included in the table above are shown at target. Share payout can range from 0 to 200% based on different performance outcomes. |
Payment of the underlying shares in connection with the vesting of stockRSU and PRSU awards generally triggers a tax obligation for the employee, which is required to be remitted to the relevant tax authorities. We have agreed to withhold shares of common stock otherwise issuable under the awardRSU and PRSU awards to cover certain of these tax obligations, with the net shares issued to the employee accounted for as outstanding common stock. We withheld 2,754,7214,441,107 and 2,605,8072,094,555 shares of common stock to cover tax obligations associated with the payment of shares upon vesting of stock awards and remitted cash of $166$439 million and $121$156 million to the appropriate tax authorities for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Our ESPP allows eligible employees to contribute up to 15% of their eligible earnings toward the semi-annual purchase of our shares of common stock at a discounted price, subject to an annual maximum dollar amount. Employees can purchase stock at a 15% discount applied to the closing stock price on the first or last day of the six-month offering period, whichever price is lower. The number of shares issued under our ESPP was 1,832,0432,144,036 and 1,905,5342,091,650 for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, the number of securities remaining available for future sale and issuance under the ESPP was 4,253,858. Sprint’s ESPP was terminated prior to the Merger close and legacy Sprint employees were eligible to enroll in our ESPP on August 15, 2020.
Our ESPP provides for an annual increase in the aggregate number of shares of our common stock reserved for sale and authorized for issuance thereunder as of the first day of each fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 2016) equal to the lesser of (i) 5,000,000 shares of our common stock, and (ii) the number of shares of T-Mobile common stock determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Compensation Committee”). For fiscal years 2016 through 2019, the Compensation Committee determined that no such increase in shares of our common stock was necessary. However, an additional 5,000,000 shares of our common stock were automatically added to the ESPP share reserve as of January 1, 2020 and 2021, respectively.
Stock Options
Stock Options
Prioroptions outstanding relate to the business combination, MetroPCS had established the MetroPCSMetro Communications, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, the Amended and Restated MetroPCSMetro Communications, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, the Layer3 TV, Inc. 2013 Stock Plan, and the Second Amended and Restated 1995 StockSprint 2015 Plan (collectively, the “Stock Option Plan (“Predecessor Plans”). Following stockholder approval of the Incentive Plan, noNo new awards have been or may be granted under the Predecessor Plans.Stock Option Plans, and no awards were granted during the year ended December 31, 2020.
The following activity occurred under the PredecessorStock Option Plans:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2019 | 194,942 | | | $ | 13.80 | | | 2.9 |
| | | | | |
| Assumed through acquisition | 1,635,518 | | | 33.37 | | | |
| Exercised | (906,295) | | | 53.02 | | | |
| Expired/canceled | (5,470) | | | 49.75 | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2020 | 918,695 | | | 51.77 | | | 4.0 |
| Exercisable at December 31, 2020 | 917,955 | | | 51.79 | | | 4.0 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) |
| Outstanding and exercisable, December 31, 2016 | 833,931 |
| | $ | 31.75 |
| | 2.3 |
| Exercised | (450,873 | ) | | 44.18 |
| | |
| Expired | (9,900 | ) | | 45.76 |
| | |
| Outstanding and exercisable, December 31, 2017 | 373,158 |
| | 16.36 |
| | 2.8 |
Stock options exercised under the PredecessorStock Option Plans generated proceeds of approximately $21$48 million and $29$1 million for the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
The grant-date fair value of share-based incentive compensation awards attributable to post-combination services, including restricted stock units and stock options, from our Merger with Sprint was approximately $163 million.
Pension and Other Post Retirement Benefits Plans
Upon the completion of our Merger with Sprint, we acquired the assets and assumed the liabilities associated with the Sprint Retirement Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”) as well as other postretirement employee benefit plans. As of December 31, 2005, the Pension Plan was amended to freeze benefit plan accruals for the participants. The plan assets acquired and obligations assumed were recognized at fair value on the Merger close date.
The objective for the investment portfolio of the Pension Plan is to achieve a long-term nominal rate of return, net of fees, that exceeds the Pension Plan's long-term expected rate of return on investments for funding purposes. To meet this objective, our investment strategy is governed by an asset allocation policy, whereby a targeted allocation percentage is assigned to each asset class as follows: 24% to U.S. equities; 17% to international equities; 44% to fixed income investments; 11% to real estate investments; and 4% to other investments including hedge funds. Actual allocations are allowed to deviate from target allocation percentages within a range for each asset class as defined in the investment policy. The long-term expected rate of return on plan assets was 5% for the year ended December 31, 2020, while the actual rate of return on plan assets was 21% during that period. The long-term expected rate of return on investments for funding purposes is 4% for the year ended December 31, 2021.
The components of net expense recognized for the Pension Plan were as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | | Year Ended December 31, 2020 |
| | | |
| Interest on projected benefit obligations | | | $ | 52 | |
| Expected return on pension plan assets | | | (45) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Net pension expense | | | $ | 7 | |
The net expense associated with the Pension Plan is included in Other expense, net of our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Investments of the Pension Plan are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, which is determined using quoted market prices or estimated fair values. As of December 31, 2020, 12% of the investment portfolio was valued at quoted prices in active markets for identical assets, 85% was valued using quoted prices for similar assets in active or inactive markets, or other observable inputs, and 3% was valued using unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, the majority of which used the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient to measure the fair value.
The fair values of our Pension Plan assets and certain other postretirement benefit plan assets in aggregate were $1.2 billion and $1.4 billion and our accumulated benefit obligations in aggregate were $2.1 billion and $2.3 billion as of April 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, respectively. As a result, the plans were underfunded by approximately $892 million and $828 million as of April 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, respectively, and were recorded in Other long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In determining our pension obligation for the year ended December 31, 2020, we used a weighted-average discount rate of 3%.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we made contributions of $58 million to the benefit plans. No contributions were made by T-Mobile in fiscal periods prior to 2020. We expect to make contributions to the Plan of $89 million through the year ending December 31, 2021.
Future benefits expected to be paid are approximately $97 million for the year ending December 31, 2021, $198 million in total for the years ending December 31, 2022 and 2023, $206 million in total for the years ending December 31, 2024 and 2025, and $548 million in total for the years ending December 31, 2026, through December 31, 2030.
Employee Retirement Savings Plan
We sponsor a retirement savings planplans for the majority of our employees under sectionSection 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and similar plans. The plans allow employees to contribute a portion of their pretax and post-tax income in accordance with specified guidelines. The plans provide that we match a percentage of employee contributions up to certain limits. Employer matching contributions were $87$179 million, $83$119 million and $73$102 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
Legacy Long-Term Incentive Plan
Note 12 – Discontinued Operations
Prior
On July 26, 2019, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Sprint and DISH. On June 17, 2020, T-Mobile, Sprint and DISH entered into the First Amendment. Pursuant to the First Amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement, T-Mobile, Sprint and DISH agreed to proceed with the closing of the Prepaid Transaction in accordance with the Asset Purchase Agreement on July 1, 2020, subject to the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the terms and conditions of the Consent Decree.
On July 1, 2020, pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, we completed the Prepaid Transaction. Upon closing of the Prepaid Transaction, we received $1.4 billion from DISH for the Prepaid Business, subject to a working capital adjustment. The close of the Prepaid Transaction did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
The assets of the Prepaid Business included EIP receivables originated pursuant to financed equipment purchases by customers of the Prepaid Business. At the time of the Prepaid Transaction, DISH did not hold certain licenses required to purchase or originate such contracts. In order to transfer the economics of the contracts to DISH without transferring ownership of them, the parties entered into a Participation Agreement under which we agreed to transfer a 100% participation interest in the contracts to DISH. Under the terms of the agreement, DISH retains all cash flows collected on these assets, and there is no recourse against us for any credit losses on such loans. The proceeds received from DISH in exchange for this participation interest was a component of total consideration received for the Prepaid Transaction. We will temporarily continue to originate equipment installment contracts on DISH’s behalf under the same terms in exchange for an amount equal to the initial outstanding principal balance of the originated contracts, again without recourse against us for any credit losses.
Of the total $1.4 billion of proceeds received under the Prepaid Transaction, approximately $162 million was allocated to the EIP receivables to which we transferred DISH a 100% participation interest. We accounted for this portion of the proceeds as a secured borrowing and present it in Other, net, within Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows accordingly. The remaining $1.2 billion was allocated to the divested net assets of the Prepaid
Business. The net cash received for the Prepaid Business is presented in Proceeds from the divestiture of prepaid business combination with MetroPCS Communications, Inc., we maintained a performance-based Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) which alignedwithin Net cash used in investing activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The results of the Prepaid Business include revenues and expenses directly attributable to our long-term business strategy. Asthe operations disposed. Corporate and administrative expenses, including Interest expense, not directly attributable to the operations were not allocated to the Prepaid Business. The results of the Prepaid Business from April 1, 2020, through December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no LTIP awards outstanding and no new awards2020, are expected to be granted underpresented in Income from discontinued operations, net of tax in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
The components of discontinued operations from the LTIP.
Compensation expense reported within operating expenses related to our LTIP and payments to participants related to our LTIPMerger close date of April 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020, were as follows:
| | | | | |
| (in millions) | Year Ended
December 31, 2020 |
| Major classes of line items constituting pretax income from discontinued operations | |
| Prepaid revenues | $ | 973 | |
| Roaming and other service revenues | 27 | |
| Total service revenues | 1,000 | |
| Equipment revenues | 270 | |
| |
| Total revenues | 1,270 | |
| Cost of services | 25 | |
| Cost of equipment sales | 499 | |
| Selling, general and administrative | 314 | |
| Total operating expenses | 838 | |
| Pretax income from discontinued operations | 432 | |
| Income tax expense | (112) | |
| Income from discontinued operations | $ | 320 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | December 31,
2015 |
| Compensation expense | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 27 |
|
| Payments | — |
| | 52 |
| | 57 |
|
Note 10 – RepurchasesNet cash provided by operating activities from the Prepaid Business included in the Consolidated Statements of Common Stock
On December 6, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase programCash Flows for up to $1.5 billion of our common stock throughthe year ended December 31, 2018. Under2020, were $611 million, all of which relates to the repurchase program, repurchases can be made from time to time using a variety of methods, which may include open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, all in accordance with the rulesoperations of the SecuritiesPrepaid Business during the three months ended June 30, 2020. There were no cash flows from investing or financing activities related to the Prepaid Business for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Continuing Involvement
Upon the closing of the Prepaid Transaction, we and Exchange Commission and other applicable legal requirements. The specific timing, price and size of purchases will depend on prevailing stock prices, general economic and market conditions, and other considerations. The repurchase program does not obligate usDISH entered into (i) a License Purchase Agreement pursuant to acquire any particular amount of common stock, andwhich (a) DISH has the repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time at our discretion. Repurchased shares are retired.
We also understand that Deutsche Telekom AG, our majority stockholder, or its affiliates, is considering plansoption to purchase additional shares of our common stock. Such purchases would likely take place through December 31, 2018, all in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and other applicable legal requirements.
The following table summarizes information regarding repurchases of our common stock:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions, except shares and per share price) | Number of Shares Repurchased | | Average Price Paid Per Share | | Total Purchase Price |
| Year Ended December 31, 2017 | 7,010,889 |
| | $ | 63.34 |
| | $ | 444 |
|
From the inception of the repurchase program through February 5, 2018, we repurchased approximately 12.3 million shares at an average price per share of $63.68certain 800 MHz spectrum licenses for a total of approximately $3.6 billion in a transaction to be completed, subject to certain additional closing conditions, following an application for FCC approval to be filed three years following the closing of the Merger and (b) we will have the option to lease back from DISH, as needed, a portion of the spectrum sold for an additional two years following the closing of the spectrum sale transaction, (ii) a Transition Services Agreement providing for our provisioning of transition services to DISH in connection with the Prepaid Business for a period of up to three years following the closing of the Prepaid Transaction, (iii) a Master Network Services Agreement providing for the provisioning of network services to customers of the Prepaid Business for a period of up to seven years following the closing of the Prepaid Transaction, and (iv) an Option to Acquire Tower and Retail Assets, offering DISH the option to acquire certain decommissioned towers and retail locations from us, subject to obtaining all necessary third-party consents, for a period of up to five years following the closing of the Prepaid Transaction.
In the event DISH breaches the License Purchase Agreement or fails to deliver the purchase price following the satisfaction or waiver of all closing conditions, DISH’s sole liability is to pay us a fee of approximately $783$72 million. Additionally, if DISH does not exercise the option to purchase the 800 MHz spectrum licenses, we have an obligation to offer the licenses for sale through an auction. If the specified minimum price of $3.6 billion was not met in the auction, we would retain the licenses. As the sale of February 5, 2018, there was approximately $717 million800 MHz spectrum licenses is not expected to close within one year, the criteria for presentation as an asset held for sale is not met.
Cash flows associated with the Master Network Services Agreement and Transition Services Agreement are included within Net cash provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of repurchase authority remaining.Cash Flows.
Note 1113 – Income Taxes
Our sources of Income before income taxes were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| U.S. | $ | 3,493 | | | $ | 4,557 | | | $ | 3,686 | |
| Foreign | 37 | | | 46 | | | 231 | |
| Income from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | 3,530 | | | $ | 4,603 | | | $ | 3,917 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| U.S. | $ | 3,274 |
| | $ | 2,286 |
| | $ | 898 |
|
| Puerto Rico | (113 | ) | | 41 |
| | 80 |
|
| Income before income taxes | $ | 3,161 |
| | $ | 2,327 |
| | $ | 978 |
|
Income tax expense is summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Current tax benefit (expense) | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | 17 | | | $ | 24 | | | $ | 39 | |
| State | (84) | | | (70) | | | (63) | |
| Foreign | (10) | | | 2 | | | (25) | |
| Total current tax expense | (77) | | | (44) | | | (49) | |
| Deferred tax benefit (expense) | | | | | |
| Federal | (676) | | | (954) | | | (750) | |
| State | (34) | | | (125) | | | (160) | |
| Foreign | 1 | | | (12) | | | (70) | |
| Total deferred tax expense | (709) | | | (1,091) | | | (980) | |
| Total income tax expense | $ | (786) | | | $ | (1,135) | | | $ | (1,029) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Current tax benefit (expense) | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | — |
| | $ | 66 |
| | $ | 30 |
|
| State | (28 | ) | | (29 | ) | | (2 | ) |
| Puerto Rico | (1 | ) | | 10 |
| | (17 | ) |
| Total current tax benefit (expense) | (29 | ) | | 47 |
| | 11 |
|
| Deferred tax benefit (expense) | | | | | |
| Federal | 1,182 |
| | (804 | ) | | (281 | ) |
| State | 173 |
| | (96 | ) | | 37 |
|
| Puerto Rico | 49 |
| | (14 | ) | | (12 | ) |
| Total deferred tax benefit (expense) | 1,404 |
| | (914 | ) | | (256 | ) |
| Total income tax benefit (expense) | $ | 1,375 |
| | $ | (867 | ) | | $ | (245 | ) |
The reconciliation between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and our effective income tax rate is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Federal statutory income tax rate | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % |
| Effect of law and rate changes | (0.8) | | | 0.4 | | | 1.9 | |
| Change in valuation allowance | (2.6) | | | (1.8) | | | (1.6) | |
| State taxes, net of federal benefit | 4.8 | | | 5.1 | | | 4.8 | |
| Foreign taxes, net of federal benefit | 0.3 | | | 0.3 | | | 2.4 | |
| Permanent differences | 0.4 | | | 0.6 | | | 0.7 | |
| Federal tax credits, net of reserves | (0.9) | | | (0.8) | | | (2.9) | |
| Equity-based compensation | (2.5) | | | (0.6) | | | (0.8) | |
| Non-deductible compensation | 2.3 | | | 0.6 | | | 0.8 | |
| Other, net | 0.3 | | | (0.1) | | | 0 | |
| Effective income tax rate | 22.3 | % | | 24.7 | % | | 26.3 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Federal statutory income tax rate | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % |
| Effect of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act | (68.9 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Change in valuation allowance | (11.4 | ) | | 1.0 |
| | (3.2 | ) |
| State taxes, net of federal benefit | 4.8 |
| | 4.0 |
| | (1.1 | ) |
| Equity-based compensation | (2.4 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | | — |
|
| Puerto Rico taxes, net of federal benefit | (1.5 | ) | | — |
| | 3.3 |
|
| Permanent differences | 0.5 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 1.6 |
|
| Federal tax credits, net of reserves | 0.3 |
| | (0.5 | ) | | (9.5 | ) |
| Other, net | 0.1 |
| | (0.6 | ) | | (1.0 | ) |
| Effective income tax rate | (43.5 | )% | | 37.3 | % | | 25.1 | % |
Significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities, tax effected, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| Deferred tax assets | | | |
| Loss carryforwards | $ | 4,540 | | | $ | 823 | |
| | | |
| Lease liabilities | 8,031 | | | 3,403 | |
| Property and equipment | 90 | | | 0 | |
| Reserves and accruals | 1,348 | | | 659 | |
| Federal and state tax credits | 411 | | | 331 | |
| | | |
| Other | 2,665 | | | 903 | |
| Deferred tax assets, gross | 17,085 | | | 6,119 | |
| Valuation allowance | (878) | | | (129) | |
| Deferred tax assets, net | 16,207 | | | 5,990 | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | | | |
| Spectrum licenses | 17,518 | | | 5,902 | |
| Property and equipment | 0 | | | 2,506 | |
| Lease right-of-use assets | 7,239 | | | 2,881 | |
| Other intangible assets | 912 | | | 19 | |
| Other | 504 | | | 289 | |
| Total deferred tax liabilities | 26,173 | | | 11,597 | |
| Net deferred tax liabilities | $ | 9,966 | | | $ | 5,607 | |
| | | |
| Classified on the balance sheet as: | | | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | $ | 9,966 | | | $ | 5,607 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Deferred tax assets | | | |
| Loss carryforwards | $ | 1,576 |
| | $ | 1,442 |
|
| Deferred rents | 759 |
| | 1,153 |
|
| Reserves and accruals | 667 |
| | 1,058 |
|
| Federal and state tax credits | 298 |
| | 284 |
|
| Debt fair market value adjustment | — |
| | 83 |
|
| Other | 403 |
| | 430 |
|
| Deferred tax assets, gross | 3,703 |
| | 4,450 |
|
| Valuation allowance | (273 | ) | | (573 | ) |
| Deferred tax assets, net | 3,430 |
| | 3,877 |
|
| Deferred tax liabilities | | | |
| Spectrum licenses | 5,038 |
| | 6,952 |
|
| Property and equipment | 1,840 |
| | 1,732 |
|
| Other intangible assets | 41 |
| | 119 |
|
| Other | 48 |
| | 12 |
|
| Total deferred tax liabilities | 6,967 |
| | 8,815 |
|
| Net deferred tax liabilities | $ | 3,537 |
| | $ | 4,938 |
|
| | | | |
| Classified on the balance sheet as: | | | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | $ | 3,537 |
| | $ | 4,938 |
|
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”) into legislation. The TCJA includes numerous changes to existing tax law, including a permanent reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The rate reduction takes effect on January 1, 2018. We recognized a net tax benefit of $2.2 billion associated with enactment of the TCJA in Income tax benefit (expense) in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income in the fourth quarter of 2017, primarily due to a re-measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The SEC has issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 118 which permits the recording of provisional amounts related to the impact of the TCJA during a measurement period which is not to exceed one year from the enactment date of the TCJA. We have recorded an immaterial amount for provisional items related to the TCJA in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we have tax effected federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of $1.0$3.5 billion, for federal income tax purposesstate NOL carryforwards of $1.5 billion and $832foreign NOL carryforwards of $67 million, for state income tax purposes, expiring through 2037.2040. Federal and certain state NOLs generated in and after 2018 do not expire. As of December 31, 2017,2020, our tax effected federal, state and stateforeign NOL carryforwards for financial reporting purposes were approximately $123$176 million, $455 million and $242$26 million, respectively, less than our NOL carryforwards for federal, state and stateforeign income tax purposes, due to unrecognized tax benefits of the same amount. The unrecognized tax benefit amounts exclude offsetting tax effects of $144 million in other jurisdictions.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we have available Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) credit carryforwards of $86 million. Under the TCJA, the AMT credits will be fully recovered by 2021. We also have research and development, and foreign tax and other general business credit carryforwards with a combined value of $198$569 million for federal income tax purposes, an immaterial amount of which beginbegins to expire in 2018.2021.
As a result of the Merger, we acquired additional deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance reserve is deemed to be necessary, as well as additional uncertain tax benefit reserves. Due to the size and complexity of the Merger, our estimate of these amounts is preliminary and is subject to finalization and adjustment, which could be material, during the measurement period of up to one year from the Merger close date. During the measurement period, we will adjust these amounts if new information is obtained about facts or circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have changed these amounts. See Note 2 - Business Combination for further information.
As of December 31, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, our valuation allowance was $273$878 million, $129 million and $573$210 million, respectively. The change infrom December 31, 2019, to December 31, 2020, primarily related to $848 million of deferred tax assets acquired via the Merger for which a valuation allowance is primarily related todeemed necessary, partially offset by a net reduction in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets in statefederal and certain other jurisdictions that resulted in the recognition of $359 million in netassociated with additional tax benefits in 2017, partially offset byattribute utilization and expiration. The change from December 31, 2018, to December 31, 2019, primarily related to a $26 million valuation allowance established during 2017 for the impact of the TCJA on certain tax credits and a $33 million increasereduction in the valuation allowance associated with the reduced federal benefit of state items.
During 2017, due to ongoing analysis of positive and negative evidence related to the utilization of theagainst deferred tax assets we determined that $319 million of the valuation allowance in certain state jurisdictions was no longer necessary. Positive evidence supporting the release of a portion of the valuation allowance included reaching a position of cumulative income over a three-year period in certain state jurisdictions as well as projecting sustained earnings in those jurisdictions. Due to this positive evidence, we reduced the valuation allowance which resulted in a decrease to Deferred tax liabilities in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets.resulting from legal entity reorganizations. We will continue to monitor positive and negative evidence related to the utilization of the remaining deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance continues to be provided. It is possible that our valuation allowance may change within the next twelve12 months.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in various state jurisdictions and in Puerto Rico.foreign jurisdictions. We are currently under a scope-limited examination by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and separate examinations by various states. Management does not believe the resolution of any of the audits will result in a material change to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The IRS has concluded its audits of our federal tax returns through the 20132009 tax year; however, NOL and other carryforwards for certain audited periods remain open for examination. We are generally closed to U.S. federal, state and Puerto Ricoforeign examination for years prior to 1998.2001 are generally closed.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits were as follows:
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | (in millions) | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year | $ | 410 |
| | $ | 411 |
| | $ | 388 |
| Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year | $ | 514 | | | $ | 462 | | | $ | 412 | |
| Gross increases to tax positions in prior periods | | Gross increases to tax positions in prior periods | 6 | | | 0 | | | 16 | |
| Gross decreases to tax positions in prior periods | (10 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (112 | ) | Gross decreases to tax positions in prior periods | (28) | | | 0 | | | (11) | |
| Gross increases to current period tax positions | 12 |
| | 4 |
| | 135 |
| Gross increases to current period tax positions | 45 | | | 64 | | | 39 | |
| Gross increases due to current period business acquisitions | | Gross increases due to current period business acquisitions | 624 | | | 0 | | | 10 | |
| Gross decreases due to settlements with taxing authorities | | Gross decreases due to settlements with taxing authorities | (2) | | | (12) | | | (4) | |
| | Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year | $ | 412 |
| | $ | 410 |
| | $ | 411 |
| Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year | $ | 1,159 | | | $ | 514 | | | $ | 462 | |
As of December 31, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, we had $254$857 million, $310 million and $168$263 million, respectively, in unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect our annual effective tax rate. The balance as of December 31, 2020 includes measurement period adjustments associated with the Merger to reflect facts and circumstances in existence as of the effective time of the Merger. Our estimate of these unrecognized tax benefits is preliminary and is subject to finalization and adjustment, which could be material, during the measurement period of up to one year from the Merger close date. Penalties and interest on income tax assessments are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses and Interest expense, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The accrued interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are insignificant.
Note 1214 – SoftBank Equity Transaction
On June 22, 2020, we entered into a Master Framework Agreement (the “Master Framework Agreement”) by and among the Company, SoftBank, SoftBank Group Capital Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of SoftBank (“SBGC”), Delaware Project 4 L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of SoftBank, Delaware Project 6 L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of SoftBank, Claure Mobile LLC (“CM LLC”), DT, and T-Mobile Agent LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
The Master Framework Agreement and related transactions were entered into to facilitate SoftBank’s monetization of a portion of our common stock held by SoftBank (the “SoftBank Monetization”). In connection with the Master Framework Agreement, DT waived the restriction on the transfer under its Proxy, Lock-Up and ROFR Agreement, dated April 1, 2020, with SoftBank (the “SoftBank Proxy Agreement”) with respect to approximately 198 million shares of our common stock held by SoftBank (the “Released Shares”). Upon the close of the Public Equity Offering (as defined below), we received a payment from SoftBank for $304 millionfor our role in facilitating the SoftBank Monetization. The payment received from SoftBank, net of tax, of $230 million was recorded as Additional paid-in capital in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and is presented as a reduction of Repurchases of common stock within Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities within our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Under the terms of the Master Framework Agreement and the agreements contemplated thereby, SBGC sold the Released Shares to us, and we participated in the following transactions:
Public Equity Offering
On June 26, 2020, we completed a registered public offering of approximately 154.1 million shares of our common stock (the “Public Equity Offering”) at a price of $103.00 per share. The net proceeds of the Public Equity Offering were used to repurchase an equal number of issued and outstanding shares of our common stock from SBGC, pursuant to a Share Repurchase Agreement, dated as of June 22, 2020 (the “Share Repurchase Agreement”), between us and SBGC.
Mandatory Exchangeable Offering
Concurrent with the Public Equity Offering, we sold approximately 19.4 million shares of our common stock to a third-party trust. The net proceeds from the sale of shares to the trust were used to repurchase an equal number of issued and outstanding shares of our common stock from SBGC.
The trust issued mandatory exchangeable trust securities, which entitle holders to receive quarterly distributions from the trust and a final mandatory exchange price to be settled on June 1, 2023 (“Mandatory Exchangeable Offering”).
The trust was required to use a portion of the net proceeds from the Mandatory Exchangeable Offering to purchase U.S. Treasury securities, to fund quarterly distributions on the mandatory exchangeable trust securities, and the holders of the mandatory exchangeable trust securities will be entitled to a final mandatory exchange amount on June 1, 2023 that will depend on the daily volume-weighted average price of shares of our common stock.
The sale of shares through the Public Equity Offering and to the trust occurred simultaneously with the purchase of shares from SBGC. These simultaneous transactions did not result in a net change to our treasury shares or shares of common stock outstanding.
As these transactions occurred with separate counterparties, the exchange of shares and cash are presented on a gross basis in our Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, respectively. The shares sold are presented in Shares issued in secondary offering and the shares purchased from SBGC are presented in Shares repurchased from SoftBank within our Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity. The cash received from the sale of shares is presented in Issuance of common stock and the cash paid to purchase shares from SoftBank are presented in Repurchases of common stock within Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities within our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The Company is not affiliated with the trust, will not retain any proceeds from the offering of the trust securities, and will have no ongoing interest, economic or otherwise, in the trust securities.
Rights Offering
The Master Framework Agreement provides for the issuance of registered, transferable subscription rights (the “Rights Offering”) resulting in the sale of 19,750,000 shares of our common stock to our stockholders (other than SoftBank, DT and Marcelo Claure and their respective affiliates, who agreed to waive their ability to exercise or transfer such rights). The subscription rights provided the stockholders the option to purchase one share of common stock for every 20 shares of common stock owned, at the same price per share as the common stock sold in the Public Equity Offering of $103.00 per share.
The Rights Offering exercise period expired on July 27, 2020. On August 3, 2020, the Rights Offering closed, resulting in the sale of 19,750,000 shares of our common stock. The net proceeds from the Rights Offering were used to purchase an equal number of shares from SBGC pursuant to the Share Repurchase Agreement.
Marcelo Claure
The Master Framework Agreement provided for the purchase of 5.0 million shares of our common stock by Marcelo Claure, a member of our board of directors, from us at the same price per share as the common stock sold in the Public Equity Offering of $103.00 per share.
Following receipt of the necessary regulatory approvals on July 16, 2020, the sale of shares to Marcelo Claure occurred simultaneously with our purchase of an equivalent number of shares from SBGC at the same price per share pursuant to the Share Repurchase Agreement.
Ownership Following the SoftBank Monetization
As of December 31, 2020, DT and SoftBank held, directly or indirectly, approximately 43.4% and 8.6%, respectively, of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock, with the remaining approximately 48.0% of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock held by other stockholders.
The SoftBank Proxy Agreement remains in effect with respect to the remaining shares of our common stock held by SoftBank. In addition, on June 22, 2020, DT, CM LLC, and Marcelo Claure entered into a Proxy, Lock-Up and ROFR Agreement (the “Claure Proxy Agreement,” together with the SoftBank Proxy Agreement, the “Proxy Agreements”), pursuant to which any shares of our common stock acquired after June 22, 2020 by Mr. Claure or CM LLC, an entity controlled by Mr. Claure, other than shares acquired as a result of Mr. Claure’s role as a director or officer of the Company, will be voted in the manner as directed by DT.
Accordingly, as a result of the Proxy Agreements, DT has voting control as of December 31, 2020 over approximately 52.3% of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock.
DT Call Option
In exchange for DT consenting to the transfer of the Released Shares and as provided for in the Master Framework Agreement, DT received direct and indirect call options over up to approximately 101.5 million shares of our common stock held by SBGC. The arrangement provided DT with a fixed-price call option to purchase up to approximately 44.9 million shares at a price of $101.46 per share indirectly from SBGC through a back-to-back arrangement where (i) DT could purchase such shares from us (the “DT Fixed-Price Call Option”) and (ii) we would fulfill our obligations under the DT Fixed-Price Call Option by simultaneously purchasing the same number of shares on the same economic terms from SBGC (the “T-Mobile Fixed-Price Call Option”). In addition, DT has a floating-price call option to purchase up to approximately 56.6 million shares from SBGC directly.
The DT Fixed-Price Call Option and the T-Mobile Fixed-Price Call Option represented free-standing derivatives and were recorded at fair value and marked-to-market each period. As the mark-to-market valuations of the T-Mobile Fixed-Price Call Option and the DT Fixed-Price Call Option moved in equal and offsetting directions, there was no net impact on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
On October 6, 2020, we assigned our rights under the T-Mobile Fixed-Price Call Option to DT and DT terminated its right to purchase shares from us under the DT Fixed-Price Call Option, resulting in derecognition of the related derivative asset and liability in equal and offsetting amounts of $1.0 billion such that there was no net impact to our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Note 15 – Repurchases of Common Stock
2017 Stock Repurchase Program
On December 6, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $1.5 billion of our common stock through December 31, 2018 (the “2017 Stock Repurchase Program”). Repurchased shares are retired. The 2017 Stock Repurchase Program completed on April 29, 2018.
The following table summarizes information regarding repurchases of our common stock under the 2017 Stock Repurchase Program:
(In millions, except shares and per share price)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended December 31, | Number of Shares Repurchased | | Average Price Paid Per Share | | Total Purchase Price |
| 2018 | 16,738,758 | | | $ | 62.96 | | | $ | 1,054 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Stock Purchases by Affiliate
In the first quarter of 2018, DT, our majority stockholder and an affiliated purchaser, purchased 3.3 million additional shares of our common stock at an aggregate market value of $200 million in the public market or from other parties, in accordance with the rules of the SEC and other applicable legal requirements. There were 0 purchases in 2019 and 2020. We did not receive proceeds from these purchases.
Note 16 – Earnings Per Share
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions, except shares and per share amounts) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | | | | $ | 2,744 | | | $ | 3,468 | | | $ | 2,888 | |
| Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | | | 320 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Net income | | | | | $ | 3,064 | | | $ | 3,468 | | | $ | 2,888 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding - basic | | | | | 1,144,206,326 | | | 854,143,751 | | | 849,744,152 | |
| Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards | | | | | 10,543,102 | | | 9,289,760 | | | 8,546,022 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted | | | | | 1,154,749,428 | | | 863,433,511 | | | 858,290,174 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | | | | | $ | 2.40 | | | $ | 4.06 | | | $ | 3.40 | |
| Discontinued operations | | | | | 0.28 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Earnings per share - basic | | | | | $ | 2.68 | | | $ | 4.06 | | | $ | 3.40 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Diluted earnings per share: | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | | | | | $ | 2.37 | | | $ | 4.02 | | | $ | 3.36 | |
| Discontinued operations | | | | | 0.28 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Earnings per share - diluted | | | | | $ | 2.65 | | | $ | 4.02 | | | $ | 3.36 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Potentially dilutive securities: | | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards | | | | | 80,180 | | | 16,359 | | | 148,422 | |
SoftBank contingent consideration (1) | | | | | 36,630,268 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions, except shares and per share amounts) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Net income | $ | 4,536 |
| | $ | 1,460 |
| | $ | 733 |
|
| Less: Dividends on mandatory convertible preferred stock | (55 | ) | | (55 | ) | | (55 | ) |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders - basic | 4,481 |
| | 1,405 |
| | 678 |
|
| Add: Dividends related to mandatory convertible preferred stock | 55 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net income attributable to common stockholders - diluted | $ | 4,536 |
| | $ | 1,405 |
| | $ | 678 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding - basic | 831,850,073 |
| | 822,470,275 |
| | 812,994,028 |
|
| Effect of dilutive securities: | | | | | |
| Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards | 9,200,873 |
| | 10,584,270 |
| | 9,623,910 |
|
| Mandatory convertible preferred stock | 30,736,504 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted | 871,787,450 |
| | 833,054,545 |
| | 822,617,938 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Earnings per share - basic | $ | 5.39 |
| | $ | 1.71 |
| | $ | 0.83 |
|
| Earnings per share - diluted | $ | 5.20 |
| | $ | 1.69 |
| | $ | 0.82 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Potentially dilutive securities: | | | | | |
| Outstanding stock options and unvested stock awards | 33,980 |
| | 3,528,683 |
| | 4,842,370 |
|
| Mandatory convertible preferred stock | — |
| | 32,238,000 |
| | 32,238,000 |
|
On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we amended and restated the Company’s certificate of incorporation in the form of the Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Restated Certificate”). Pursuant to the Restated Certificate, the authorized capital stock of T-Mobile consists of 2,000,000,000 shares of T-Mobile common stock and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.00001 per share.
As of December 15, 2017, 2031, 2020, we had authorized 100 million shares of our preferred stock, converted to approximately 32 million shareswith a par value of our common stock at a conversion rate of 1.6119 common shares for each share of previously outstanding$0.00001 per share. There was 0 preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and certain cash-in-lieu of fractional shares.
2019. Potentially dilutive securities were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share if to do so would have been anti-dilutive.anti-dilutive or if there was a loss from continuing operations for the period.
The SoftBank Specified Shares Amount of 48,751,557 was determined to be contingent consideration for the Merger and is not dilutive until the defined volume-weighted average price per share is reached.
Note 1317 – CommitmentsLeases
Lessee
Through the Merger, we acquired leases of real property, including cell sites, switch sites, dark fiber, retail stores and Contingenciesoffice facilities and recorded lease liabilities and associated right-of-use assets based on the discounted lease payments. Lease terms that are favorable or unfavorable to market terms were recorded as an adjustment to lease right-of-use assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Favorable and unfavorable leases are amortized on a straight-line basis over the associated remaining lease term.
CommitmentsOn September 14, 2020, T-Mobile and American Tower Corporation (“American Tower”) entered into a lease agreement (the “American Tower Lease Agreement”) that will enable us to lease American Tower towers through April 2035. The American Tower Lease Agreement extended the term and modified the rental payments for approximately 20,729 American Tower towers currently leased by us. As a result of this modification, we remeasured the associated right-of-use assets and lease liabilities resulting in an increase of $11.0 billion to each on the effective date of the modification.
Operating Leases
The components of lease expense were as follows:
We | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Operating lease expense | | | | | $ | 4,438 | | | $ | 2,558 | |
| Financing lease expense: | | | | | | | |
| Amortization of right-of-use assets | | | | | 681 | | | 523 | |
| Interest on lease liabilities | | | | | 81 | | | 82 | |
| Total financing lease expense | | | | | 762 | | | 605 | |
| Variable lease expense | | | | | 328 | | | 243 | |
| Total lease expense | | | | | $ | 5,528 | | | $ | 3,406 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Information relating to the lease term and discount rate is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2020 | | 2019 |
| Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term (Years) | | | |
| Operating leases | 10 | | 6 |
| Financing leases | 3 | | 3 |
| Weighted Average Discount Rate | | | |
| Operating leases | 3.9 | % | | 4.8 | % |
| Financing leases | 3.3 | % | | 4.0 | % |
Maturities of lease liabilities as of December 31, 2020, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Operating Leases | | Finance Leases |
| Twelve Months Ending December 31, | | | |
| 2021 | $ | 4,903 | | | $ | 1,121 | |
| 2022 | 4,354 | | | 795 | |
| 2023 | 3,759 | | | 422 | |
| 2024 | 3,339 | | | 137 | |
| 2025 | 2,807 | | | 92 | |
| Thereafter | 18,940 | | | 61 | |
| Total lease payments | 38,102 | | | 2,628 | |
| Less: imputed interest | 7,515 | | | 121 | |
| Total | $ | 30,587 | | | $ | 2,507 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Interest payments for financing leases were $79 million and $82 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
As of December 31, 2020, we have non-cancellableadditional operating leases for cell sites switch sites, retail stores and office facilitiescommercial properties that have not yet commenced with contractual terms expiring through 2027. The majorityfuture lease payments of cell site leases have an initial non-cancelable term of five to ten years with several renewal options. In addition, we have operating leases for dedicated transportation lines with varying expiration terms through 2024. Our commitments under these leases are approximately $2.4 billion in 2018, $4.1 billion in total for 2019 and 2020, $2.7 billion in total for 2021 and 2022 and $2.3 billion in total for years thereafter.$227 million.
As of December 31, 2017,2020, we were contingently liable for future ground lease payments related to thecertain tower obligations. These contingent obligations are not included in the above table as the amounts dueowed are contractually owed by CCICrown Castle International Corp. based on the subleasing arrangement. See Note 8 –9 - Tower Obligations for further information.
Lessor
Through the Merger, we acquired leased wireless devices with a fair value of $5.8 billion as of April 1, 2020.
The components of leased wireless devices under operating leases, including dedicated transportation lines, was $2.9 billion, $2.8 billion and $2.8 billion forour Leasing Programs were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Average Remaining Useful Life | | December 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| | | | | |
| Leased wireless devices, gross | 8 months | | $ | 6,989 | | | $ | 1,139 | |
| Accumulated depreciation | | | (2,170) | | | (407) | |
| | | | | |
| Leased wireless devices, net | | | $ | 4,819 | | | $ | 732 | |
For equipment revenues from the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is classified as Costlease of services and Selling, general and administrative in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.mobile communication devices, see Note 10 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
In February 2018, we extendedFuture minimum payments expected to be received over the leaseslease term related to our corporate headquarters facility. These agreements will increase our minimumleased wireless devices, which exclude optional residual buy-out amounts at the end of the lease payments by approximately $400 million in the aggregate.term, are summarized below:
| | | | | |
| (in millions) | Expected Payments |
| Twelve Months Ending December 31, | |
| |
| 2021 | $ | 1,687 | |
| 2022 | 92 | |
| |
| Total | $ | 1,779 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Note 18 – Commitments and Contingencies
Purchase Commitments
We have commitments for non-dedicated transportation lines with varying expiration terms that generally extend through 2028.2029. In addition, we have commitments to purchase spectrum licenses, wireless devices, network services, equipment, software, marketing sponsorship agreements and other items in the ordinary course of business, with various terms through 2028.2043.
Our purchase commitments, including purchase commitments assumed through the Merger, are approximately $5.0 billion for the year ending December 31, 2021, $4.5 billion in total for the years ending December 31, 2022 and 2023, $2.4 billion in total for the years ending December 31, 2024 and 2025 and $1.7 billion in total for the years thereafter. These amounts are not reflective of our entire anticipated purchases under the related agreements but are determined based on the non-cancelable quantities or termination amounts to which we are contractually obligated.
We have contractualSpectrum Leases
In connection with the Merger, we assumed certain spectrum lease contracts from Sprint that include service obligations to purchase certain goodsthe lessors. Certain of the spectrum leases provide for minimum lease payments, additional charges, renewal options and services from various other parties. escalation clauses. Leased spectrum agreements have varying expiration terms that generally extend through 2050. We expect that all renewal periods in our spectrum leases will be exercised by us.
Our purchase obligationsspectrum lease and service credit commitments, including renewal periods, are approximately $2.1 billion$338 million for the year ending December 31, 2021, $675 million in 2018, $2.2total for the years ending December 31, 2022 and 2023, $594 million in total for the years ending December 31, 2024 and 2025 and $5.1 billion in total for 2019 and 2020, $1.5 billion in total for 2021 and 2022 and $1.0 billion in total forthe years thereafter.
In September 2017, we entered intoWe accrue a UPA to acquiremonthly obligation for the remaining equity in IWS, a 54% owned unconsolidated subsidiary, for a purchase price of $25 million. In January 2018, we closed on the purchase agreementservices and received the IWS spectrum licenses, among other assets. See Note 5 - Goodwill, Spectrum Licenses and Other Intangible Assets for further information.
On January 22, 2018, we completed our acquisition of television innovator Layer3 TV for consideration of approximately $325 million, subject to customary working capital and other post-closing adjustments. Upon closing of the transaction, Layer3 TV became a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary. This transaction represents an opportunity for us to acquire a unique and complementary service and represents a progression in our video strategy, which began with Binge On, was strengthened with Netflix On Us, and will expand further with Layer3 TV’s management, technology, and content relationships which will enable us to bring the Un-carrier philosophy to video.
Our first-quarter 2018 operating results will include the results of Layer3 TV from the date of acquisition. Our consolidated balance sheet will include the assets and liabilities of Layer3 TV, such as intangibles assets acquired, which are being appraised by a third-party and include various assumptions in determining fair value.
Renewable Energy Purchase Agreements
In January 2017, T-Mobile USA entered into a REPA with Red Dirt Wind Project, LLC. The agreement isequipment based on the expected operation of a wind energy-generating facility located in Oklahoma and will remain in effect untiltotal estimated available service credits divided by the twelfth anniversaryterm of the facility’s entry into commercial operation.lease. The facility began commercial operationsobligation is reduced by services provided and as actual invoices are presented and paid to the lessors. The maximum remaining service commitment on December 31, 2020 was $92 million and is expected to be incurred over the term of the related lease agreements, which generally range from 15 to 30 years.
Merger Commitments
In connection with the regulatory proceedings and approvals of the Transactions, we have commitments and other obligations to various state and federal agencies and certain nongovernmental organizations, including pursuant to the Consent Decree agreed to by us, DT, Sprint, SoftBank and DISH and entered by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and the
FCC’s memorandum opinion and order approving our applications for approval of the Merger. These commitments and obligations include, among other things, extensive 5G network build-out commitments, obligations to deliver high-speed wireless services to the vast majority of Americans, including Americans residing in January 2018. The REPA consists of two components: (1) an energy forward agreement that is net settled based on energy pricesrural areas, and the energy output generated bymarketing of an in-home broadband product where spectrum capacity is available. Other commitments relate to national security, pricing, service, employment and support of diversity initiatives. Many of the facilitycommitments specify time frames for compliance. Failure to fulfill our obligations and (2)commitments in a commitment to purchase the renewable energy credits (“RECs”)timely manner could result in substantial fines, penalties, or other legal and administrative actions.
We expect that our monetary commitments associated with the energy output generated by the facility. T-Mobile USA will net settle the forward agreement and acquire the RECs monthly by paying, or receiving, an aggregate net payment based on two variables (1) the facility’s energy output, which has an estimated
maximum capacity ofthese matters are approximately 160 megawatts and (2) the difference between (a) an initial fixed price, subject to annual escalation, and (b) current local marginal energy prices during the monthly settlement period. We have determined that the REPA does not meet the definition of a derivative because the expected energy output of the facility may not be reliably estimated (the arrangement lacks a notional amount). The REPA does not contain any unconditional purchase obligations because amounts under the agreement are not fixed and determinable. Our participation in the REPA did not require an upfront investment or capital commitment. We do not control the activities that most significantly impact the energy-generating facility nor do we receive specific energy output from it. No amounts were settled under the agreement during$23 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.
In August 2017, T-Mobile USA entered into a REPA with Solomon Forks Wind Project, LLC. The agreement is based on2021, $37 million in total for the expected operation of a wind energy-generating facility located in Kansas and will remain in effect until the fifteenth anniversary of the facility’s entry into commercial operation. Commercial operation of the facility is expected to occur by the end of 2018. The REPA consists of two components: (1) an energy forward agreement that is net settled based on energy prices and the energy output generated by the facility and (2) a commitment to purchase the environmental attributes (“EACs”) associated with the energy output generated by the facility. T-Mobile USA will net settle the forward agreement and acquire the EACs monthly by paying, or receiving, an aggregate net payment based on two variables (1) the facility’s energy output, which has an estimated maximum capacity of approximately 160 megawatts and (2) the difference between (a) an initial fixed price, subject to annual escalation, and (b) current local marginal energy prices during the monthly settlement period. We have determined that the REPA does not meet the definition of a derivative because the expected energy output of the facility may not be reliably estimated (the arrangement lacks a notional amount). The REPA does not contain any unconditional purchase obligations because amounts under the agreement are not fixed and determinable. Our participation in the REPA did not require an upfront investment or capital commitment. We do not control the activities that most significantly impact the energy-generating facility nor do we receive specific energy output from it. No amounts were settled under the agreement during the yearyears ended December 31, 2017.2022 and 2023 and $13 million in total for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025. These amounts do not represent our entire anticipated costs to achieve specified network coverage and performance requirements, employment targets or commitments to provide access to affordable rate plans, but represent only those amounts for which we are required to make a specified payment in connection with our commitments or settlements.
Contingencies and Litigation
Litigation Matters
We are involved in various lawsuits and disputes, claims, government agency investigations and enforcement actions, and other proceedings (“Litigation Matters”) that arise in the ordinary course of business, which include claims of patent infringement (most of which are asserted by non-practicing entities primarily seeking monetary damages), class actions, and proceedings to enforce FCC rules and regulations. TheThose Litigation Matters described above have progressed toare at various stages, and some of them may proceed to trial, arbitration, hearing, or other adjudication that could result in fines, penalties, or awards of monetary or injunctive relief in the coming 12 months if they are not otherwise resolved. We have established an accrual with respect to certain of these matters, where appropriate, which is reflected in the consolidated financial statements but that we dois not consider,considered to be, individually or in the aggregate, material. An accrual is established when we believe it is both probable that a loss has been incurred and an amount can be reasonably estimated. For other matters, where we have not determined that a loss is probable or because the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated, we have not recorded an accrual due to various factors typical in contested proceedings, including, but not limited to:to, uncertainty concerning legal theories and their resolution by courts or regulators;regulators, uncertain damage theories and demands;demands, and a less than fully developed factual record. While weWe do not expect that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings,Litigation Matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, but we note that an unfavorable outcome of some or all of these proceedingsthe specific matters identified below could have a material adverse impact on results of operations or cash flows for a particular period. This assessment is based on our current understanding of relevant facts and circumstances. As such, our view of these matters is subject to inherent uncertainties and may change in the future.
On February 28, 2020, we received a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Admonishment from the FCC, which proposed a penalty against us for allegedly violating section 222 of the Communications Act and the FCC’s regulations governing the privacy of customer information. We recorded an accrual for an estimated payment amount as of December 31, 2020, which was included in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we assumed the contingencies and litigation matters of Sprint.
Those matters include a wide variety of disputes, claims, government agency investigations and enforcement actions, and other proceedings. These matters include, among other things, certain ongoing FCC and state government agency investigations into Sprint’s Lifeline program. In September 2019, Sprint notified the FCC that it had claimed monthly subsidies for serving subscribers even though these subscribers may not have met usage requirements under Sprint's usage policy for the Lifeline program, due to an inadvertent coding issue in the system used to identify qualifying subscriber usage that occurred in July 2017 while the system was being updated. Sprint has made a number of payments to reimburse the federal government and certain states for excess subsidy payments. Resolution of these matters could require making additional reimbursements and paying additional fines and penalties.
In November 2020, we entered into a consent decree with the FCC to resolve certain of these Lifeline matters, which resulted in a payment of $200 million by SoftBank. We note that pursuant to Amendment No. 2 to the Business Combination Agreement, SoftBank agreed to indemnify us against certain specified matters and losses, including those relating to these Lifeline matters. As of December 31, 2020, we have recorded a contingent liability and an offsetting indemnification asset for the expected reimbursement by SoftBank for certain Lifeline matters which have not been resolved. We expect that any additional liabilities related to these indemnified matters would be indemnified and reimbursed by SoftBank. See Note 2 - Business Combination for further information.
Note 1419 – Restructuring Costs
Upon close of the Merger, we began implementing restructuring initiatives to realize cost efficiencies and reduce redundancies. The major activities associated with the restructuring initiatives to date include contract termination costs associated with the rationalization of retail stores, distribution channels, duplicative backhaul services and other agreements, severance costs associated with the integration of redundant processes and functions and the decommissioning of network infrastructure including cell sites and equipment to achieve synergies in network costs.
The following table summarizes the expenses incurred in connection with our restructuring initiatives:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| (in millions) | | | Year Ended
December 31, 2020 | | |
| Contract termination costs | | | $ | 178 | | | |
| Severance costs | | | 385 | | | |
| Network decommissioning | | | 497 | | | |
| Total restructuring plan expenses | | | $ | 1,060 | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
The expenses associated with the restructuring initiatives are included in Costs of services and Selling, general and administrative in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. No expenses were incurred related to our restructuring initiatives for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Our restructuring initiatives also include the acceleration or termination of certain of our operating and financing leases for cell sites, switch sites, retail stores, network equipment and office facilities. Incremental expenses associated with accelerating amortization of the right-of-use assets on lease contracts were $153 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 and are included within Costs of services and Selling, general and administrative in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
The changes in the liabilities associated with our restructuring initiatives, including expenses incurred and cash payments, are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | April 1,
2020 | | Expenses Incurred | | Cash Payments | | Adjustments for Non-Cash Items (1) | | December 31,
2020 |
| Contract termination costs | $ | 0 | | | $ | 178 | | | $ | (96) | | | $ | (1) | | | $ | 81 | |
| Severance costs | 0 | | | 385 | | | (239) | | | (94) | | | 52 | |
| Network decommissioning | 0 | | | 497 | | | (403) | | | (64) | | | 30 | |
| Total | $ | 0 | | | $ | 1,060 | | | $ | (738) | | | $ | (159) | | | $ | 163 | |
(1) Non-cash items consists of non-cash stock-based compensation included within Severance costs and the write-off of assets within Network decommissioning.
The liabilities accrued in connection with our restructuring initiatives are presented in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Our restructuring activities are expected to occur over the next three years with substantially all costs incurred by the end of fiscal year 2023. We are evaluating additional restructuring initiatives, which are dependent on consultations and negotiation with certain counterparties and the expected impact on our business operations, which could affect the amount or timing of the restructuring costs and related payments.
Note 20 – Additional Financial Information
Supplemental Consolidated Balance Sheets Information
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are summarized as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2020 | | December 31,
2019 |
| Accounts payable | $ | 5,564 | | | $ | 4,322 | |
| Payroll and related benefits | 1,163 | | | 802 | |
| Property and other taxes, including payroll | 1,540 | | | 682 | |
| Interest | 771 | | | 227 | |
| Commissions | 399 | | | 251 | |
| | | |
| Toll and interconnect | 217 | | | 156 | |
| Advertising | 135 | | | 127 | |
| Other | 407 | | | 179 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 10,196 | | | $ | 6,746 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Accounts payable | $ | 6,182 |
| | $ | 5,163 |
|
| Payroll and related benefits | 614 |
| | 559 |
|
| Property and other taxes, including payroll | 620 |
| | 525 |
|
| Interest | 253 |
| | 423 |
|
| Commissions | 324 |
| | 159 |
|
| Network decommissioning | 92 |
| | 101 |
|
| Toll and interconnect | 109 |
| | 85 |
|
| Advertising | 46 |
| | 44 |
|
| Other | 288 |
| | 93 |
|
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 8,528 |
| | $ | 7,152 |
|
Book overdrafts included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities were $455$628 million and $356$463 million as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
Hurricane Impacts
During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, our operations in Texas, Florida and Puerto Rico experienced losses related to hurricanes. The impact to operating income for the year ended December 31, 2017, from lost revenue, assets damaged or destroyed and other hurricane related costs was a decrease of $201 million, net of insurance recoveries. We expect additional expenses to be incurred and customer activity to be impacted in the first quarter of 2018, primarily related to our operations in Puerto Rico. We have recognized insurance recoveries related to those hurricane losses in the amount of approximately $93 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 as an offset to the costs incurred within Cost of services in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and as an increase to Other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We continue to assess the damage of the hurricanes and work with our insurance carriers to submit claims for property damage and business interruption. We expect to record additional insurance recoveries related to these hurricanes in future periods.
Supplemental Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Information
Related Party Transactions
Deutsche Telekom
We have related party transactions associated with Deutsche TelekomDT or its affiliates in the ordinary course of business, which are included in the consolidated financial statements.
On April 1, 2020, in connection with the closing of the Merger, we:
•Repaid our $4.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility with DT, consisting of a $2.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility due 2022 and a $2.0 billion Incremental Term Loan Facility due 2024;
•Terminated our revolving credit facility with DT;
•Repurchased from DT $4.0 billion of indebtedness to affiliates, consisting of $2.0 billion of 5.300% Senior Notes due 2021 and $2.0 billion of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024;
•Amended the $1.25 billion of 5.125% Senior Notes due 2025 and $1.25 billion of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027, which represent indebtedness to affiliates, to change the maturity dates thereof to April 15, 2021 and April 15, 2022, respectively (the “2025 and 2027 Amendments”); and
•Made an additional payment for requisite consents to DT of $13 million. These payments were recognized as a reduction to Long-term debt to affiliates in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
On July 4, 2020, we redeemed $1.25 billion aggregate principal amount of our 5.125% Senior Notes to affiliates due 2021.
Amounts associated with the debt owed to DT are reflected as Short-term debt to affiliates and Long-term debt to affiliates in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Interest related to this debt is reflected as Interest expense to affiliates in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
The following table summarizes the impact of significant transactions with Deutsche TelekomDT or its affiliates included in operatingOperating expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Discount related to roaming expenses | | | | | $ | (5) | | | $ | (9) | | | $ | 0 | |
| Fees incurred for use of the T-Mobile brand | | | | | 83 | | | 88 | | | 84 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| International long distance agreement | | | | | 47 | | | 39 | | | 36 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Discount related to roaming expenses | $ | — |
| | $ | (15 | ) | | $ | (21 | ) |
| Fees incurred for use of the T-Mobile brand | 79 |
| | 74 |
| | 65 |
|
| Expenses for telecommunications and IT services | 12 |
| | 25 |
| | 23 |
|
| International long distance agreement | 55 |
| | 60 |
| | — |
|
We have an agreement with Deutsche Telekom for theDT in which we receive reimbursement of certain administrative expenses, which were $11was $6 million $11 million, and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Note 15 – Subsequent Events
On January 22, 2018, we completed our acquisition of television innovator Layer3 TV for consideration of approximately $325 million, subject to customary working capital and other post-closing adjustments. See Note 13 - Commitments and Contingencies for further information.
In January 2018, we redeemed $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of our 6.125% Senior Notes due 2022 and issued $1.0 billion of public 4.500% Senior Notes due 2026 and issued $1.5 billion of public 4.750% Senior Notes due 2028. Additionally in January 2018, DT agreed to purchase $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 4.500% Senior Notes due 2026 and $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of 4.750% Senior Notes due 2028 directly from T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, with no underwriting discount. See Note 7 - Debt for further information.
In February 2018, the service receivable sale arrangement was amended to extend the scheduled expiration date to March 2019. See Note 3 - Sales of Certain Receivables for further information.
Note 16 – Guarantor Financial Information
Pursuant to the applicable indentures and supplemental indentures, the long-term debt to affiliates and third parties, excluding Senior Secured Term Loans and capital leases, issued by T-Mobile USA (“Issuer”) is fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by T-Mobile (“Parent”) and certain of the Issuer’s 100% owned subsidiaries (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”).
In January 2017, T-Mobile USA, and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, borrowed $4.0 billion under the Incremental Term Loan Facility to refinance $1.98 billion of outstanding secured term loans under its Term Loan Credit Agreement dated November 9, 2015, with the remaining net proceeds from the transaction intended to be used to redeem callable high yield debt.
In March 2017, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, (i) issued $500 million in aggregate principal amount of public 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022, (ii) issued $500 million in aggregate principal amount of public 5.125% Senior Notes due 2025 and (iii) issued $500 million in aggregate principal amount of public 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027.
In April 2017, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, (i) issued $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 4.000% Senior Notes due 2022, (ii) issued $1.25 billion in aggregate principal amount of 5.125% Senior Notes due 2025 and (iii) issued $750 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027. Additionally, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, redeemed through net settlement, the $1.25 billion outstanding aggregate principal amount of the 6.288% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 2019 and $1.25 billion in aggregate principal amount of the 6.366% Senior Reset Notes to affiliates due 2020.
In May 2017, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, (i) issued $2.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 5.300% Senior Notes due 2021, (ii) issued $1.35 billion in aggregate principal amount of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024 and (iii) issued $650 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.000% Senior Notes due 2024.
In September 2017, T-Mobile USA and certain of its affiliates, as guarantors, issued the remaining $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2027.
The guarantees of the Guarantor Subsidiaries are subject to release in limited circumstances only upon the occurrence of certain customary conditions. The indentures and credit facilities governing the long-term debt contain covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of the Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries to: incur more debt; pay dividends and make distributions; make certain investments; repurchase stock; create liens or other encumbrances; enter into transactions with affiliates; enter
into transactions that restrict dividends or distributions from subsidiaries; and merge, consolidate, or sell, or otherwise dispose of, substantially all of their assets. Certain provisions of each of the credit facilities, indentures and supplemental indentures relating to the long-term debt restrict the ability of the Issuer to loan funds or make payments to Parent. However, the Issuer and Guarantor Subsidiaries are allowed to make certain permitted payments to the Parent under the terms of the indentures and the supplemental indentures.
During the preparation of the condensed consolidating financial information of T-Mobile US, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2017, it was determined that certain intercompany advances were misclassified in Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities2020 and Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities in the Condensed Consolidating Statement$11 million for each of Cash Flows Information for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018. Amounts due
from and to DT related to these agreements are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as filed“Accounts Receivables from affiliates” and “Payables to affiliates,” respectively.
SoftBank
On June 22, 2020, we entered into a Master Framework Agreement and related transactions with SoftBank related to the SoftBank Monetization as described in Note 14 - SoftBank Equity Transaction. On July 27, 2020, in connection with the SoftBank Monetization, the Rights Offering exercise period closed, and on August 3, 2020, the Rights Offering closed, resulting in the sale of 19,750,000 shares of our common stock. On August 3, 2020, upon completion of the SoftBank Monetization, DT and SoftBank held, directly or indirectly, approximately 43.4% and 8.6%, respectively, of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock, with the remaining approximately 48.0% of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock held by other stockholders. As a result of the Proxy Agreements, DT has voting control as of August 3, 2020 over approximately 52.4% of the outstanding T-Mobile common stock. In addition, as provided for in the Master Framework Agreement, DT also holds certain call options over approximately 101.5 million shares of our common stock held by SBGC.
On October 6, 2020, we assigned our rights under the T-Mobile Fixed-Price Call Option to DT and DT terminated its right to purchase shares from us under the DT Fixed-Price Call Option, resulting in derecognition of the related derivative asset and liability in equal and offsetting amounts such that there was no net impact to our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Brightstar
We had arrangements with Brightstar, a subsidiary of SoftBank, whereby Brightstar provided supply chain and inventory management services to us in our 2016 Form 10-K.indirect channels. We have revised the Issuer, Guarantor Subsidiariesterminated or restructured most of our arrangements with Brightstar, except for reverse logistics and Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries columns trade-in services. Revenue resulting from sale of devices distributed by Brightstar is generally recognized when sold to an end customer (commonly referred to as recognized on a sell-through basis). Amounts included in our consolidated financial statements associated with these supply chain and inventory management arrangements with Brightstar were not material.
For more information regarding our related party transactions with SoftBank, see Note 2 - Business Combination and Note 14 - SoftBank Equity Transactionof the Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Information to reclassify Intercompany advances, net from Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities to Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities. The impactsNotes to the Issuer, Guarantor Subsidiaries and Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries columns for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $696 million, $625 million and $71 million, respectively. The impacts to the Issuer, Guarantor Subsidiaries and Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries columns for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $3.4 billion, $3.3 billion and $69 million, respectively. The revisions, which we have determined are not material, are eliminated upon consolidation and have no impact on our consolidated cash flows.Consolidated Financial Statements.
Presented below is the condensed consolidating financial information as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information
December 31, 2017
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Parent | | Issuer | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments | | Consolidated |
| Assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 74 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 1,086 |
| | $ | 58 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,219 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | — |
| | — |
| | 1,659 |
| | 256 |
| | — |
| | 1,915 |
|
| Equipment installment plan receivables, net | — |
| | — |
| | 2,290 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,290 |
|
| Accounts receivable from affiliates | — |
| | — |
| | 22 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 22 |
|
| Inventories | — |
| | — |
| | 1,566 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,566 |
|
| Other current assets | — |
| | — |
| | 1,275 |
| | 628 |
| | — |
| | 1,903 |
|
| Total current assets | 74 |
| | 1 |
| | 7,898 |
| | 942 |
| | — |
| | 8,915 |
|
Property and equipment, net (1) | — |
| | — |
| | 21,890 |
| | 306 |
| | — |
| | 22,196 |
|
| Goodwill | — |
| | — |
| | 1,683 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,683 |
|
| Spectrum licenses | — |
| | — |
| | 35,366 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 35,366 |
|
| Other intangible assets, net | — |
| | — |
| | 217 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 217 |
|
| Investments in subsidiaries, net | 22,534 |
| | 40,988 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (63,522 | ) | | — |
|
| Intercompany receivables and note receivables | — |
| | 8,503 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8,503 | ) | | — |
|
| Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net | — |
| | — |
| | 1,274 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,274 |
|
| Other assets | — |
| | 2 |
| | 814 |
| | 236 |
| | (140 | ) | | 912 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 22,608 |
| | $ | 49,494 |
| | $ | 69,142 |
| | $ | 1,484 |
| | $ | (72,165 | ) | | $ | 70,563 |
|
| Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | — |
| | $ | 253 |
| | $ | 8,014 |
| | $ | 261 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8,528 |
|
| Payables to affiliates | — |
| | 146 |
| | 36 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 182 |
|
| Short-term debt | — |
| | 999 |
| | 613 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,612 |
|
| Deferred revenue | — |
| | — |
| | 779 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 779 |
|
| Other current liabilities | 17 |
| | — |
| | 192 |
| | 205 |
| | — |
| | 414 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 17 |
| | 1,398 |
| | 9,634 |
| | 466 |
| | — |
| | 11,515 |
|
| Long-term debt | — |
| | 10,911 |
| | 1,210 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12,121 |
|
| Long-term debt to affiliates | — |
| | 14,586 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14,586 |
|
Tower obligations (1) | — |
| | — |
| | 392 |
| | 2,198 |
| | — |
| | 2,590 |
|
| Deferred tax liabilities | — |
| | — |
| | 3,677 |
| | — |
| | (140 | ) | | 3,537 |
|
| Deferred rent expense | — |
| | — |
| | 2,720 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,720 |
|
| Negative carrying value of subsidiaries, net | — |
| | — |
| | 629 |
| | — |
| | (629 | ) | | — |
|
| Intercompany payables and debt | 32 |
| | — |
| | 8,201 |
| | 270 |
| | (8,503 | ) | | — |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | — |
| | 65 |
| | 866 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | 935 |
|
| Total long-term liabilities | 32 |
| | 25,562 |
| | 17,695 |
| | 2,472 |
| | (9,272 | ) | | 36,489 |
|
| Total stockholders' equity (deficit) | 22,559 |
| | 22,534 |
| | 41,813 |
| | (1,454 | ) | | (62,893 | ) | | 22,559 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 22,608 |
| | $ | 49,494 |
| | $ | 69,142 |
| | $ | 1,484 |
| | $ | (72,165 | ) | | $ | 70,563 |
|
| |
(1) | Assets and liabilities for Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries are primarily included in VIEs related to the 2012 Tower Transaction. See Note 8 – Tower Obligations for further information. |
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information
December 31, 2016
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Parent | | Issuer | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments | | Consolidated |
| Assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current assets | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 358 |
| | $ | 2,733 |
| | $ | 2,342 |
| | $ | 67 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,500 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | — |
| | — |
| | 1,675 |
| | 221 |
| | — |
| | 1,896 |
|
| Equipment installment plan receivables, net | — |
| | — |
| | 1,930 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,930 |
|
| Accounts receivable from affiliates | — |
| | — |
| | 40 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 40 |
|
| Inventories | — |
| | — |
| | 1,111 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,111 |
|
| Asset purchase deposit | — |
| | — |
| | 2,203 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,203 |
|
| Other current assets | — |
| | — |
| | 972 |
| | 565 |
| | — |
| | 1,537 |
|
| Total current assets | 358 |
| | 2,733 |
| | 10,273 |
| | 853 |
| | — |
| | 14,217 |
|
Property and equipment, net (1) | — |
| | — |
| | 20,568 |
| | 375 |
| | — |
| | 20,943 |
|
| Goodwill | — |
| | — |
| | 1,683 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,683 |
|
| Spectrum licenses | — |
| | — |
| | 27,014 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 27,014 |
|
| Other intangible assets, net | — |
| | — |
| | 376 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 376 |
|
| Investments in subsidiaries, net | 17,682 |
| | 35,095 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (52,777 | ) | | — |
|
| Intercompany receivables and note receivables | 196 |
| | 6,826 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (7,022 | ) | | — |
|
| Equipment installment plan receivables due after one year, net | — |
| | — |
| | 984 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 984 |
|
| Other assets | — |
| | 7 |
| | 600 |
| | 262 |
| | (195 | ) | | 674 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 18,236 |
| | $ | 44,661 |
| | $ | 61,498 |
| | $ | 1,490 |
| | $ | (59,994 | ) | | $ | 65,891 |
|
| Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | — |
| | $ | 423 |
| | $ | 6,474 |
| | $ | 255 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 7,152 |
|
| Payables to affiliates | — |
| | 79 |
| | 46 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 125 |
|
| Short-term debt | — |
| | 20 |
| | 334 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 354 |
|
| Deferred revenue | — |
| | — |
| | 986 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 986 |
|
| Other current liabilities | — |
| | — |
| | 258 |
| | 147 |
| | — |
| | 405 |
|
| Total current liabilities | — |
| | 522 |
| | 8,098 |
| | 402 |
| | — |
| | 9,022 |
|
| Long-term debt | — |
| | 20,741 |
| | 1,091 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21,832 |
|
| Long-term debt to affiliates | — |
| | 5,600 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,600 |
|
Tower obligations (1) | — |
| | — |
| | 400 |
| | 2,221 |
| | — |
| | 2,621 |
|
| Deferred tax liabilities | — |
| | — |
| | 5,133 |
| | — |
| | (195 | ) | | 4,938 |
|
| Deferred rent expense | — |
| | — |
| | 2,616 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,616 |
|
| Negative carrying value of subsidiaries, net | — |
| | — |
| | 568 |
| | — |
| | (568 | ) | | — |
|
| Intercompany payables and debt | — |
| | — |
| | 6,785 |
| | 237 |
| | (7,022 | ) | | — |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | — |
| | 116 |
| | 906 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | 1,026 |
|
| Total long-term liabilities | — |
| | 26,457 |
| | 17,499 |
| | 2,462 |
| | (7,785 | ) | | 38,633 |
|
| Total stockholders' equity (deficit) | 18,236 |
| | 17,682 |
| | 35,901 |
| | (1,374 | ) | | (52,209 | ) | | 18,236 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 18,236 |
| | $ | 44,661 |
| | $ | 61,498 |
| | $ | 1,490 |
| | $ | (59,994 | ) | | $ | 65,891 |
|
| |
(1) | Assets and liabilities for Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries are primarily included in VIEs related to the 2012 Tower Transaction. See Note 8 – Tower Obligations for further information. |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income Information
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Parent | | Issuer | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments | | Consolidated |
| Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Service revenues | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 28,894 |
| | $ | 2,113 |
| | $ | (847 | ) | | $ | 30,160 |
|
| Equipment revenues | — |
| | — |
| | 9,620 |
| | — |
| | (245 | ) | | 9,375 |
|
| Other revenues | — |
| | 3 |
| | 879 |
| | 212 |
| | (25 | ) | | 1,069 |
|
| Total revenues | — |
| | 3 |
| | 39,393 |
| | 2,325 |
| | (1,117 | ) | | 40,604 |
|
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below | — |
| | — |
| | 6,076 |
| | 24 |
| | — |
| | 6,100 |
|
| Cost of equipment sales | — |
| | — |
| | 10,849 |
| | 1,003 |
| | (244 | ) | | 11,608 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | — |
| | — |
| | 12,276 |
| | 856 |
| | (873 | ) | | 12,259 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | — |
| | 5,914 |
| | 70 |
| | — |
| | 5,984 |
|
| Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses | — |
| | — |
| | (235 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (235 | ) |
| Total operating expense | — |
| | — |
| | 34,880 |
| | 1,953 |
| | (1,117 | ) | | 35,716 |
|
| Operating income | — |
| | 3 |
| | 4,513 |
| | 372 |
| | — |
| | 4,888 |
|
| Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | — |
| | (811 | ) | | (109 | ) | | (191 | ) | | — |
| | (1,111 | ) |
| Interest expense to affiliates | — |
| | (560 | ) | | (23 | ) | | — |
| | 23 |
| | (560 | ) |
| Interest income | 1 |
| | 29 |
| | 10 |
| | — |
| | (23 | ) | | 17 |
|
| Other (expense) income, net | — |
| | (88 | ) | | 16 |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (73 | ) |
| Total other income (expense), net | 1 |
| | (1,430 | ) | | (106 | ) | | (192 | ) | | — |
| | (1,727 | ) |
| Income (loss) before income taxes | 1 |
| | (1,427 | ) | | 4,407 |
| | 180 |
| | — |
| | 3,161 |
|
| Income tax benefit (expense) | — |
| | — |
| | 1,527 |
| | (152 | ) | | — |
| | 1,375 |
|
| Earnings (loss) of subsidiaries | 4,535 |
| | 5,962 |
| | (57 | ) | | — |
| | (10,440 | ) | | — |
|
| Net income | 4,536 |
| | 4,535 |
| | 5,877 |
| | 28 |
| | (10,440 | ) | | 4,536 |
|
| Dividends on preferred stock | (55 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (55 | ) |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 4,481 |
| | $ | 4,535 |
| | $ | 5,877 |
| | $ | 28 |
| | $ | (10,440 | ) | | $ | 4,481 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income | $ | 4,536 |
| | $ | 4,535 |
| | $ | 5,877 |
| | $ | 28 |
| | $ | (10,440 | ) | | $ | 4,536 |
|
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | 7 |
| | 7 |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | (14 | ) | | 7 |
|
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 4,543 |
| | $ | 4,542 |
| | $ | 5,884 |
| | $ | 28 |
| | $ | (10,454 | ) | | $ | 4,543 |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income Information
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Parent | | Issuer | | Guarantor Subsidiaries (As adjusted - See Note 1) | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments | | Consolidated (As adjusted - See Note 1) |
| Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Service revenues | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 26,613 |
| | $ | 2,023 |
| | $ | (792 | ) | | $ | 27,844 |
|
| Equipment revenues | — |
| | — |
| | 9,145 |
| | — |
| | (418 | ) | | 8,727 |
|
| Other revenues | — |
| | 3 |
| | 739 |
| (1) | 195 |
| | (18 | ) | | 919 |
|
| Total revenues | — |
| | 3 |
| | 36,497 |
| (1) | 2,218 |
| | (1,228 | ) | | 37,490 |
|
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below | — |
| | — |
| | 5,707 |
| | 24 |
| | — |
| | 5,731 |
|
| Cost of equipment sales | — |
| | — |
| | 10,209 |
| | 1,027 |
| | (417 | ) | | 10,819 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | — |
| | — |
| | 11,321 |
| | 868 |
| | (811 | ) | | 11,378 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | — |
| | 6,165 |
| | 78 |
| | — |
| | 6,243 |
|
| Cost of MetroPCS business combination | — |
| | — |
| | 104 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 104 |
|
| Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses | — |
| | — |
| | (835 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (835 | ) |
| Total operating expenses | — |
| | — |
| | 32,671 |
| | 1,997 |
| | (1,228 | ) | | 33,440 |
|
| Operating income | — |
| | 3 |
| | 3,826 |
| (1) | 221 |
| | — |
| | 4,050 |
|
| Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | — |
| | (1,147 | ) | | (82 | ) | | (189 | ) | | — |
| | (1,418 | ) |
| Interest expense to affiliates | — |
| | (312 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (312 | ) |
| Interest income (expense) | — |
| | 31 |
| | (18 | ) | (1) | — |
| | — |
| | 13 |
|
| Other income (expense), net | — |
| | 2 |
| | (8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (6 | ) |
| Total other expense, net | — |
| | (1,426 | ) | | (108 | ) | (1) | (189 | ) | | — |
| | (1,723 | ) |
| Income (loss) before income taxes | — |
| | (1,423 | ) | | 3,718 |
| | 32 |
| | — |
| | 2,327 |
|
| Income tax expense | — |
| | — |
| | (857 | ) | | (10 | ) | | — |
| | (867 | ) |
| Earnings (loss) of subsidiaries | 1,460 |
| | 2,883 |
| | (17 | ) | | — |
| | (4,326 | ) | | — |
|
| Net income | 1,460 |
| | 1,460 |
| | 2,844 |
| | 22 |
| | (4,326 | ) | | 1,460 |
|
| Dividends on preferred stock | (55 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (55 | ) |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 1,405 |
| | $ | 1,460 |
| | $ | 2,844 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | (4,326 | ) | | $ | 1,405 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 1,460 |
| | $ | 1,460 |
| | $ | 2,844 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | (4,326 | ) | | $ | 1,460 |
|
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | (6 | ) | | 2 |
|
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 1,462 |
| | $ | 1,462 |
| | $ | 2,846 |
| | $ | 24 |
| | $ | (4,332 | ) | | $ | 1,462 |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income Information
Year Ended December 31, 2015
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Parent | | Issuer | | Guarantor Subsidiaries (As adjusted - See Note 1) | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments | | Consolidated (As adjusted - See Note 1) |
| Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Service revenues | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 23,748 |
| | $ | 1,669 |
| | $ | (596 | ) | | $ | 24,821 |
|
| Equipment revenues | — |
| | — |
| | 7,148 |
| | — |
| | (430 | ) | | 6,718 |
|
| Other revenues | — |
| | 1 |
| | 770 |
| (1) | 171 |
| | (14 | ) | | 928 |
|
| Total revenues | — |
| | 1 |
| | 31,666 |
| (1) | 1,840 |
| | (1,040 | ) | | 32,467 |
|
| Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of services, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below | — |
| | — |
| | 5,530 |
| | 24 |
| | — |
| | 5,554 |
|
| Cost of equipment sales | — |
| | — |
| | 9,055 |
| | 720 |
| | (431 | ) | | 9,344 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | — |
| | — |
| | 10,065 |
| | 733 |
| | (609 | ) | | 10,189 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | — |
| | 4,605 |
| | 83 |
| | — |
| | 4,688 |
|
| Cost of MetroPCS business combination | — |
| | — |
| | 376 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 376 |
|
| Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses | — |
| | — |
| | (163 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (163 | ) |
| Total operating expenses | — |
| | — |
| | 29,468 |
| | 1,560 |
| | (1,040 | ) | | 29,988 |
|
| Operating income | — |
| | 1 |
| | 2,198 |
| (1) | 280 |
| | — |
| | 2,479 |
|
| Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense | — |
| | (847 | ) | | (50 | ) | | (188 | ) | | — |
| | (1,085 | ) |
| Interest expense to affiliates | — |
| | (411 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (411 | ) |
| Interest income | — |
| | 2 |
| | 4 |
| (1) | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
|
| Other expense, net | — |
| | (10 | ) | | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (11 | ) |
| Total other expense, net | — |
| | (1,266 | ) | | (46 | ) | (1) | (189 | ) | | — |
| | (1,501 | ) |
| Income (loss) before income taxes | — |
| | (1,265 | ) | | 2,152 |
| | 91 |
| | — |
| | 978 |
|
| Income tax expense | — |
| | — |
| | (214 | ) | | (31 | ) | | — |
| | (245 | ) |
| Earnings (loss) of subsidiaries | 733 |
| | 1,998 |
| | (48 | ) | | — |
| | (2,683 | ) | | — |
|
| Net income | 733 |
| | 733 |
| | 1,890 |
| | 60 |
| | (2,683 | ) | | 733 |
|
| Dividends on preferred stock | (55 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (55 | ) |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 678 |
| | $ | 733 |
| | $ | 1,890 |
| | $ | 60 |
| | $ | (2,683 | ) | | $ | 678 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 733 |
| | $ | 733 |
| | $ | 1,890 |
| | $ | 60 |
| | $ | (2,683 | ) | | $ | 733 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | | — |
| | 4 |
| | (2 | ) |
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 731 |
| | $ | 731 |
| | $ | 1,888 |
| | $ | 60 |
| | $ | (2,679 | ) | | $ | 731 |
|
Condensed Consolidating StatementSupplemental Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Information
Year Ended
The following table summarizes T-Mobile’s supplemental cash flow information:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| (in millions) | | | | | 2020 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Interest payments, net of amounts capitalized | | | | | $ | 2,733 | | | $ | 1,128 | | | $ | 1,525 | |
| Operating lease payments | | | | | 4,619 | | | 2,783 | | | 0 | |
| Income tax payments | | | | | 218 | | | 88 | | | 51 | |
| Non-cash investing and financing activities | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Non-cash beneficial interest obtained in exchange for securitized receivables | | | | | 6,194 | | | 6,509 | | | 4,972 | |
| Non-cash consideration for the acquisition of Sprint | | | | | 33,533 | | | 0 | | | 0 | |
| Change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities for purchases of property and equipment | | | | | 589 | | | (935) | | | 65 | |
| Leased devices transferred from inventory to property and equipment | | | | | 2,795 | | | 1,006 | | | 1,011 | |
| Returned leased devices transferred from property and equipment to inventory | | | | | (1,460) | | | (267) | | | (326) | |
| Short-term debt assumed for financing of property and equipment | | | | | 38 | | | 800 | | | 291 | |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations | | | | | 14,129 | | | 3,621 | | | 0 | |
| Financing lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations | | | | | 1,273 | | | 1,041 | | | 885 | |
Note 21 – Subsequent Events
Subsequent to December 31, 20172020, on January 14, 2021, we issued an aggregate of $3.0 billion in Senior Notes. A portion of the senior secured term loan commitments were reduced by an amount equal to the aggregate gross proceeds of the Senior Notes, which reduced the commitment to $2.0 billion. See Note 8 – Debtfor further information. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Parent | | Issuer | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments | | Consolidated |
| Operating activities | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (1,613 | ) | | $ | 9,616 |
| | $ | 58 |
| | $ | (100 | ) | | $ | 7,962 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investing activities | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | — |
| | — |
| | (5,237 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (5,237 | ) |
| Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits | — |
| | — |
| | (5,828 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (5,828 | ) |
| Equity investment in subsidiary | (308 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 308 |
| | — |
|
| Other, net | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (308 | ) | | — |
| | (11,064 | ) | | — |
| | 308 |
| | (11,064 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Financing activities | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | — |
| | 10,480 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,480 |
|
| Proceeds from borrowing on revolving credit facility, net | — |
| | 2,910 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,910 |
|
| Repayments of revolving credit facility | — |
| | — |
| | (2,910 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2,910 | ) |
| Repayments of capital lease obligations | — |
| | — |
| | (486 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (486 | ) |
| Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net | — |
| | — |
| | (300 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (300 | ) |
| Repayments of long-term debt | — |
| | — |
| | (10,230 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (10,230 | ) |
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 21 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21 |
|
| Repurchases of common shares | (427 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (427 | ) |
| Intercompany advances, net | 484 |
| | (14,817 | ) | | 14,300 |
| | 33 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Equity investment from parent | — |
| | 308 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (308 | ) | | — |
|
| Tax withholdings on share-based awards | — |
| | — |
| | (166 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (166 | ) |
| Intercompany dividend paid | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (100 | ) | | 100 |
| | — |
|
| Dividends on preferred stock | (55 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (55 | ) |
| Other, net | — |
| | — |
| | (16 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (16 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 23 |
| | (1,119 | ) | | 192 |
| | (67 | ) | | (208 | ) | | (1,179 | ) |
| Change in cash and cash equivalents | (284 | ) | | (2,732 | ) | | (1,256 | ) | | (9 | ) | | — |
| | (4,281 | ) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of period | 358 |
| | 2,733 |
| | 2,342 |
| | 67 |
| | — |
| | 5,500 |
|
| End of period | $ | 74 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 1,086 |
| | $ | 58 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,219 |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Information
Year EndedSubsequent to December 31, 20162020, on February 1, 2021, the valuation process was complete with respect to Shentel’s wireless telecommunication assets used to provide services pursuant to the Management Agreement, for which we previously exercised an option to purchase. The parties are negotiating the remaining outstanding terms of a definitive agreement to govern the purchase of Shentel’s wireless telecommunication assets and expect the transaction to close in the second quarter of 2021 after satisfying customary conditions to closing. The base purchase price of the wireless telecommunication assets is $1.9 billion, subject to certain other purchase price adjustments prescribed by the Management Agreement and such additional purchase price adjustments agreed by the parties. See Note 2 – Business Combination for further information. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Parent | | Issuer | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments | | Consolidated |
| Operating activities | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | 6 |
| | $ | (1,335 | ) | | $ | 7,541 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | $ | (110 | ) | | $ | 6,135 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investing activities | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | — |
| | — |
| | (4,702 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (4,702 | ) |
| Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits | — |
| | — |
| | (3,968 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,968 | ) |
| Sales of short-term investments | — |
| | 2,000 |
| | 998 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,998 |
|
| Other, net | — |
| | — |
| | (8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (8 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | — |
| | 2,000 |
| | (7,680 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (5,680 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Financing activities | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | — |
| | 997 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 997 |
|
| Repayments of capital lease obligations | — |
| | — |
| | (205 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (205 | ) |
| Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net | — |
| | — |
| | (150 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (150 | ) |
| Repayments of long-term debt | — |
| | — |
| | (20 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (20 | ) |
| Intercompany advances, net | — |
| | (696 | ) | | 625 |
| | 71 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 29 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 29 |
|
| Tax withholdings on share-based awards | — |
| | — |
| | (121 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (121 | ) |
| Intercompany dividend paid | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (110 | ) | | 110 |
| | — |
|
| Dividends on preferred stock | (55 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (55 | ) |
| Other, net | — |
| | — |
| | (12 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (12 | ) |
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (26 | ) | | 301 |
| | 117 |
| | (39 | ) | | 110 |
| | 463 |
|
| Change in cash and cash equivalents | (20 | ) | | 966 |
| | (22 | ) | | (6 | ) | | — |
| | 918 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of period | 378 |
| | 1,767 |
| | 2,364 |
| | 73 |
| | — |
| | 4,582 |
|
| End of period | $ | 358 |
| | $ | 2,733 |
| | $ | 2,342 |
| | $ | 67 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,500 |
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows Information
Year Ended December 31, 2015
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Parent | | Issuer | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Consolidating and Eliminating Adjustments | | Consolidated |
| Operating activities | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (1,147 | ) | | $ | 6,652 |
| | $ | 85 |
| | $ | (175 | ) | | $ | 5,414 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Investing activities | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | — |
| | — |
| | (4,724 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (4,724 | ) |
| Purchases of spectrum licenses and other intangible assets, including deposits | — |
| | — |
| | (1,935 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1,935 | ) |
| Purchases of short-term investments | — |
| | (1,999 | ) | | (998 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2,997 | ) |
| Investment in subsidiaries | (1,905 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,905 |
| | — |
|
| Other, net | — |
| | — |
| | 96 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 96 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | (1,905 | ) | | (1,999 | ) | | (7,561 | ) | | — |
| | 1,905 |
| | (9,560 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Financing activities | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from capital contribution | — |
| | 1,905 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,905 | ) | | — |
|
| Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt | — |
| | 3,979 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,979 |
|
| Proceeds from tower obligations | — |
| | 140 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 140 |
|
| Repayments of capital lease obligations | — |
| | — |
| | (57 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (57 | ) |
| Repayments of short-term debt for purchases of inventory, property and equipment, net | — |
| | — |
| | (564 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (564 | ) |
| Intercompany advances, net | — |
| | (3,357 | ) | | 3,288 |
| | 69 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 47 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 47 |
|
| Intercompany dividend paid | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (175 | ) | | 175 |
| | — |
|
| Tax withholdings on share-based awards | — |
| | — |
| | (156 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (156 | ) |
| Dividends on preferred stock | (41 | ) | | — |
| | (14 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (55 | ) |
| Other, net | — |
| | — |
| | 79 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 79 |
|
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 6 |
| | 2,667 |
| | 2,576 |
| | (106 | ) | | (1,730 | ) | | 3,413 |
|
| Change in cash and cash equivalents | (1,900 | ) | | (479 | ) | | 1,667 |
| | (21 | ) | | — |
| | (733 | ) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of period | 2,278 |
| | 2,246 |
| | 697 |
| | 94 |
| | — |
| | 5,315 |
|
| End of period | $ | 378 |
| | $ | 1,767 |
| | $ | 2,364 |
| | $ | 73 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,582 |
|
Supplementary Data
Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except shares and per share amounts) | First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter | | Full Year |
| 2017 | | | | | | | | | |
| Total revenues | $ | 9,613 |
| | $ | 10,213 |
| | $ | 10,019 |
| | $ | 10,759 |
| | $ | 40,604 |
|
| Operating income | 1,037 |
| | 1,416 |
| | 1,323 |
| | 1,112 |
| | 4,888 |
|
| Net income | 698 |
| | 581 |
| | 550 |
| | 2,707 |
| | 4,536 |
|
| Dividends on preferred stock | (14 | ) | | (14 | ) | | (13 | ) | | (14 | ) | | (55 | ) |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | 684 |
| | 567 |
| | 537 |
| | 2,693 |
| | 4,481 |
|
| Earnings per share | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.83 |
| | $ | 0.68 |
| | $ | 0.65 |
| | $ | 3.22 |
| | $ | 5.39 |
|
| Diluted | 0.80 |
| | 0.67 |
| | 0.63 |
| | 3.11 |
| | 5.20 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 827,723,034 |
| | 830,971,528 |
| | 831,189,779 |
| | 837,416,683 |
| | 831,850,073 |
|
| Diluted | 869,395,250 |
| | 870,456,447 |
| | 871,420,065 |
| | 871,501,578 |
| | 871,787,450 |
|
| Net income includes: | | | | | | | | | |
| Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses | $ | (37 | ) | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (29 | ) | | $ | (168 | ) | | $ | (235 | ) |
| 2016 | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues (1) | $ | 8,664 |
| | $ | 9,287 |
| | $ | 9,305 |
| | $ | 10,234 |
| | $ | 37,490 |
|
Operating income (1) | 1,168 |
| | 833 |
| | 1,048 |
| | 1,001 |
| | 4,050 |
|
| Net income | 479 |
| | 225 |
| | 366 |
| | 390 |
| | 1,460 |
|
| Dividends on preferred stock | (14 | ) | | (14 | ) | | (13 | ) | | (14 | ) | | (55 | ) |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | 465 |
| | 211 |
| | 353 |
| | 376 |
| | 1,405 |
|
| Earnings per share | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | 0.43 |
| | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | 1.71 |
|
| Diluted | 0.56 |
| | 0.25 |
| | 0.42 |
| | 0.45 |
| | 1.69 |
|
| Weighted average shares outstanding | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 819,431,761 |
| | 822,434,490 |
| | 822,998,697 |
| | 824,982,734 |
| | 822,470,275 |
|
| Diluted | 859,382,827 |
| | 829,752,956 |
| | 832,257,819 |
| | 867,262,400 |
| | 833,054,545 |
|
| Net income includes: | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of MetroPCS business combination | $ | 36 |
| | $ | 59 |
| | $ | 15 |
| | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | 104 |
|
| Gains on disposal of spectrum licenses | (636 | ) | | — |
| | (199 | ) | | — |
| | (835 | ) |
| |
(1) | The amortized imputed discount on EIP receivables previously recognized as Interest income has been retrospectively re-classified as Other revenues. See Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except share and per share amounts) | First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter | | Full Year |
| 2020 | | | | | | | | | |
| Total revenues | $ | 11,113 | | | $ | 17,671 | | | $ | 19,272 | | | $ | 20,341 | | | $ | 68,397 | |
| Operating income | 1,539 | | | 820 | | | 2,565 | | | 1,712 | | | 6,636 | |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations | 951 | | | (210) | | | 1,253 | | | 750 | | | 2,744 | |
| Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | 0 | | | 320 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 320 | |
| Net income | 951 | | | 110 | | | 1,253 | | | 750 | | | 3,064 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Earnings per share | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per share | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | 1.11 | | | $ | (0.17) | | | $ | 1.01 | | | $ | 0.60 | | | $ | 2.40 | |
| Discontinued operations | 0 | | | 0.26 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0.28 | |
| Basic | $ | 1.11 | | | $ | 0.09 | | | $ | 1.01 | | | $ | 0.60 | | | $ | 2.68 | |
| Diluted earnings per share | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | $ | 1.10 | | | $ | (0.17) | | | $ | 1.00 | | | $ | 0.60 | | | $ | 2.37 | |
| Discontinued operations | 0 | | | 0.26 | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 0.28 | |
| Diluted | $ | 1.10 | | | $ | 0.09 | | | $ | 1.00 | | | $ | 0.60 | | | $ | 2.65 | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 858,148,284 | | | 1,236,528,444 | | | 1,238,450,665 | | | 1,241,578,615 | | | 1,144,206,326 | |
| Diluted | 865,998,532 | | | 1,236,528,444 | | | 1,249,798,740 | | | 1,251,566,899 | | | 1,154,749,428 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 2019 | | | | | | | | | |
| Total revenues | $ | 11,080 | | | $ | 10,979 | | | $ | 11,061 | | | $ | 11,878 | | | $ | 44,998 | |
| Operating income | 1,476 | | | 1,541 | | | 1,471 | | | 1,234 | | | 5,722 | |
| Income from continuing operations | 908 | | | 939 | | | 870 | | | 751 | | | 3,468 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | 908 | | | 939 | | | 870 | | | 751 | | | 3,468 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Earnings per share | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 1.07 | | | $ | 1.10 | | | $ | 1.02 | | | $ | 0.88 | | | $ | 4.06 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Diluted | $ | 1.06 | | | $ | 1.09 | | | $ | 1.01 | | | $ | 0.87 | | | $ | 4.02 | |
| Weighted average shares outstanding | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 851,223,498 | | | 854,368,443 | | | 854,578,241 | | | 856,294,467 | | | 854,143,751 | |
| Diluted | 858,643,481 | | | 860,135,593 | | | 862,690,751 | | | 864,158,739 | | | 863,433,511 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share is computed independently for each quarter and the sum of the quarters may not equal earnings per share for the full year. There were no discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) designed to ensure information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls are also designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act.procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K.
The certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed as exhibits 31.1 and 31.2, respectively, to this Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
ThereOn April 1, 2020, we completed our Merger with Sprint and have implemented new processes and internal controls to assist us in the preparation and disclosure of financial information. Other than the integration of Sprint, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Management'sManagement’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions;transactions, providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;principles, providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures are made in accordance with management authorization;authorization, and providing reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of company assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2020.
On April 1, 2020, we completed our Merger with Sprint and have implemented new processes and internal controls to assist us
in the preparation and disclosure of financial information. We have also integrated certain Sprint business processes into our existing processes, systems and internal control over financial reporting. Given the significance of the Sprint acquisition and the complexity of systems and business processes, we have excluded certain acquired Sprint processes and internal controls that were not integrated from our evaluation of internal control over financial reporting. This exclusion is in accordance with the guidance issued by the SEC that permits registrants to exclude an acquired business from management’s report on internal control over financial reporting for the first year after the acquisition is completed. The total assets of Sprint, excluding the elements related to processes that have been integrated with our processes, and excluding goodwill, spectrum licenses and other
identifiable intangible assets that were subject to our evaluation, represent approximately 14% of consolidated assets as of December 31, 2020. The total revenues of Sprint represent approximately 30% of the consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172020 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report herein.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
We maintain a code of ethics applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer, and Controller, which is a “Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers” as defined by applicable rules of the SEC. This code is publicly available on our website at investor.t-mobile.com. If we make any amendments to this code other than technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments, or grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of this code we will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date and to whom it applies on our website at investor.t-mobile.com or in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.
The remaining information required by this item, including information about our Directors, Executive Officers and Audit Committee, iswill be incorporated by reference to thefrom our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which willto be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2017.pursuant to Regulation 14A or be included in an amendment to this Report.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item iswill be incorporated by reference to thefrom our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which willto be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2017.pursuant to Regulation 14A or to be included in an amendment to this Report.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item iswill be incorporated by reference to thefrom our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which willto be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2017.pursuant to Regulation 14A or to be included in an amendment to this Report.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item iswill be incorporated by reference to thefrom our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which willto be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2017.pursuant to Regulation 14A or to be included in an amendment to this Report.
Item 14. Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item iswill be incorporated by reference to thefrom our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which willto be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after December 31, 2017.pursuant to Regulation 14A or to be included in an amendment to this Report.
PART IV.
Item 15. Exhibits,Exhibit and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Documents filed as a part of this Form 10-K:10-K
1. Financial Statements
The following financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
All other schedules have been omitted because they are not required, not applicable or the required information is otherwise included.
3. Exhibits
See the Index to Exhibits immediately following Item“Item 16. Form 10-K SummarySummary” of this Form 10-K.
Item 16. Form 10–K Summary
None.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 2.1 | | Business Combination Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2018, by and among T-Mobile US, Inc., Huron Merger Sub LLC, Superior Merger Sub Corporation, Sprint Corporation, Starburst I, Inc., Galaxy Investment Holdings, Inc., and for the limited purposes set forth therein, Deutsche Telekom AG, Deutsche Telekom Holding B.V. and SoftBank Group Corp. | | 8-K | | 04/30/2018 | | 2.1 | | |
| 2.2 | | Amendment No. 1, dated as of July 26, 2019, to the Business Combination Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2018, by and among T-Mobile US, Inc., Huron Merger Sub LLC, Superior Merger Sub Corporation, Sprint Corporation, Starburst I, Inc., Galaxy Investment Holdings, Inc., and for the limited purposes set forth therein, Deutsche Telekom AG, Deutsche Telekom Holding B.V., and SoftBank Group Corp. | | 8-K | | 7/26/2019 | | 2.2 | | |
| 2.3 | | Amendment No. 2, dated as of February 20, 2020, to the Business Combination Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2018, by and among T-Mobile US, Inc., Huron Merger Sub LLC, Superior Merger Sub Corporation, Sprint Corporation, Starburst I, Inc., Galaxy Investment Holdings, Inc., and for the limited purposes set forth therein, Deutsche Telekom AG, Deutsche Telekom Holding B.V., and SoftBank Group Corp. | | 8-K | | 2/20/2020 | | 2.1 | | |
| 2.4 | | | | 8-K | | 7/26/2019 | | 2.1 | | |
| 2.5 | | | | 8-K | | 6/17/2020 | | 2.1 | | |
| 3.1 | | | | 8-K | | 4/1/2020 | | 3.1 | | |
| 3.2 | | | | 8-K | | 4/1/2020 | | 3.2 | | |
| 4.1 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.2 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.12 | | |
| 4.3 | | | | 10-Q | | 10/28/2014 | | 4.3 | | |
| 4.4 | | | | 8-K | | 9/5/2014 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.5 | | | | 10-Q | | 10/27/2015 | | 4.3 | | |
| 4.6 | | | | 8-K | | 11/5/2015 | | 4.1 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 2.1 | | | | 8-K | | 10/3/2012 | | 2.1 | |
|
| 2.2 | | | | 8-K | | 12/7/2012 | | 2.1 | |
|
| 2.3 | | | | 8-K | | 4/15/2013 | | 2.1 | |
|
| 3.1 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 3.1 | |
|
| 3.2 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 3.2 | |
|
| 3.3 | | | | 8-K | | 12/15/2014 | | 3.1 | |
|
| 4.1 | | | | 8-K | | 9/21/2010 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.2 | | | | 8-K | | 9/21/2010 | | 4.2 | |
|
| 4.3 | | | | 8-K | | 11/17/2010 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.4 | | | | 10-K | | 3/1/2011 | | 10.19(d) | |
|
| 4.5 | | | | 10-K | | 3/1/2011 | | 10.19(e) | |
|
| 4.6 | | | | 8-K | | 12/17/2012 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.7 | | | | 8-K | | 12/17/2012 | | 4.2 | |
|
| 4.8 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.15 | |
|
| 4.9 | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 4.19 | |
|
| 4.10 | | | | 10-Q | | 10/28/2014 | | 4.2 | |
|
| 4.11 | | | | 10-Q | | 10/27/2015 | | 4.2 | |
|
| 4.12 | | | | 10-Q | | 10/24/2016 | | 4.1 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 4.7 | | | | 8-K | | 4/1/2016 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.8 | | | | 8-K | | 3/16/2017 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.9 | | | | 8-K | | 3/16/2017 | | 4.2 | | |
| 4.10 | | | | 8-K | | 3/16/2017 | | 4.3 | | |
| 4.11 | | | | 8-K | | 4/28/2017 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.12 | | | | 8-K | | 4/28/2017 | | 4.3 | | |
| 4.13 | | | | 8-K | | 5/9/2017 | | 4.2 | | |
| 4.14 | | | | 8-K | | 1/25/2018 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.15 | | | | 8-K | | 1/25/2018 | | 4.2 | | |
| 4.16 | | | | 10-Q | | 5/1/2018 | | 4.5 | | |
| 4.17 | | | | 8-K | | 5/4/2018 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.18 | | | | 8-K | | 5/4/2018 | | 4.2 | | |
| 4.19 | | | | 8-K | | 5/21/2018 | | 4.1 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 4.13 | | | | 8-K | | 3/22/2013 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.14 | | | | 8-K | | 3/22/2013 | | 4.2 | |
|
| 4.15 | | | | 8-K | | 3/22/2013 | | 4.3 | |
|
| 4.16 | | | | 8-K | | 3/22/2013 | | 4.4 | |
|
| 4.17 | | | | 8-K | | 3/22/2013 | | 4.5 | |
|
| 4.18 | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 4.17 | |
|
| 4.19 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.16 | |
|
| 4.20 | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 4.20 | |
|
| 4.21 | | | | 10-Q | | 10/28/2014 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.22 | | | | 10-Q | | 10/27/2015 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.23 | | | | 10-Q | | 10/24/2016 | | 4.2 | |
|
| 4.24 | | | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 4.25 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.26 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.2 | |
|
| 4.27 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.3 | |
|
| 4.28 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.4 | |
|
| 4.29 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.5 | |
|
| 4.30 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.6 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 4.20 | | | | 8-K | | 12/21/2018 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.21 | | | | 10-K | | 2/7/2019 | | 4.41 | | |
| 4.22 | | | | 10-Q | | 10/28/2019 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.23 | | | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 4.12 | | |
| 4.24 | | | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 4.13 | | |
| 4.25 | | | | 8-K | | 1/14/2021 | | 4.2 | | |
| 4.26 | | | | 8-K | | 1/14/2021 | | 4.3 | | |
| 4.27 | | | | 8-K | | 1/14/2021 | | 4.4 | | |
| 4.28 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.13 | | |
| 4.29 | | | | 8-K | | 4/13/2020 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.30 | | | | 8-K | | 4/13/2020 | | 4.2 | | |
| 4.31 | | | | 8-K | | 4/13/2020 | | 4.3 | | |
| 4.32 | | | | 8-K | | 4/13/2020 | | 4.4 | | |
| 4.33 | | | | 8-K | | 4/13/2020 | | 4.5 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 4.31 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.7 | |
|
| 4.32 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.8 | |
|
| 4.33 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.9 | |
|
| 4.34 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.10 | |
|
| 4.35 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.11 | |
|
| 4.36 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.12 | |
|
| 4.37 | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 4.18 | |
|
| 4.38 | | | | 8-K | | 8/22/2013 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.39 | | | | 8-K | | 11/22/2013 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.40 | | | | 8-K | | 11/22/2013 | | 4.2 | |
|
| 4.41 | | | | 10-Q | | 10/28/2014 | | 4.3 | |
|
| 4.42 | | | | 8-K | | 9/5/2014 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.43 | | | | 8-K | | 9/5/2014 | | 4.2 | |
|
| 4.44 | | | | 10-Q | | 10/27/2015 | | 4.3 | |
|
| 4.45 | | | | 8-K | | 11/5/2015 | | 4.1 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 4.34 | | | | 8-K | | 4/13/2020 | | 4.6 | | |
| 4.35 | | | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 4.7 | | |
| 4.36 | | | | 8-K | | 6/26/2020 | | 4.2 | | |
| 4.37 | | | | 8-K | | 6/26/2020 | | 4.3 | | |
| 4.38 | | | | 8-K | | 6/26/2020 | | 4.4 | | |
| 4.39 | | | | 8-K | | 10/6/2020 | | 4.4 | | |
| 4.40 | | | | 8-K | | 10/6/2020 | | 4.5 | | |
| 4.41 | | | | 8-K | | 10/6/2020 | | 4.6 | | |
| 4.42 | | | | 8-K | | 10/6/2020 | | 4.7 | | |
| 4.43 | | | | 8-K | | 10/28/2020 | | 4.4 | | |
| 4.44 | | | | 8-K | | 10/28/2020 | | 4.5 | | |
| 4.45 | | | | 8-K | | 10/28/2020 | | 4.6 | | |
| 4.46 | | | | 8-K | | 10/28/2020 | | 4.7 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 4.46 | | | | 8-K | | 4/1/2016 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.47 | | | | 10-Q | | 10/24/2016 | | 4.3 | |
|
| 4.48 | | | | 8-K | | 3/16/2017 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.49 | | | | 8-K | | 3/16/2017 | | 4.2 | |
|
| 4.50 | | | | 8-K | | 3/16/2017 | | 4.3 | |
|
| 4.51 | | | | 8-K | | 4/28/2017 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.52 | | | | 8-K | | 4/28/2017 | | 4.2 | |
|
| 4.53 | | | | 8-K | | 4/28/2017 | | 4.3 | |
|
| 4.54 | | | | 8-K | | 5/9/2017 | | 4.1 | |
|
| 4.55 | | | | 8-K | | 5/9/2017 | | 4.2 | |
|
| 4.56 | | | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 4.57 | | | | 8-K | | 1/25/2018 | | 4.1 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 4.47 | | | | 8-K | | 4/13/2020 | | 4.7 | | |
| 4.48 | | | | 8-K | | 6/26/2020 | | 4.5 | | |
| 4.49 | | | | 8-K | | 10/6/2020 | | 4.8 | | |
| 4.50 | | | | 8-K | | 10/28/2020 | | 4.8 | | |
| 4.51 | | | | 10-Q
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 11/2/1998 | | 4(b) | | |
| 4.52 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 2/3/1999 | | 4(b) | | |
| 4.53 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 10/29/2001 | | 99 | | |
| 4.54 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 9/11/2013 | | 4.5 | | |
| 4.55 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 5/18/2018 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.56 | | Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 1, 2020, by and among Sprint Capital Corporation, Sprint Communications, Inc., Sprint Corporation, T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (as successor to Bank One, N.A.), as trustee. | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 4.19 | | |
| 4.57 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 11/9/2011 | | 4.1 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 4.58 | | | | 8-K | | 1/25/2018 | | 4.2 | |
|
| 4.59 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.13 | |
|
| 10.1 | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.2 | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.2 | |
|
| 10.3 | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.3 | |
|
| 10.4 | | MPL Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc. and CCTMO LLC. | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.4 | |
|
| 10.5 | | First Amendment to MPL Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc. and CCTMO LLC. | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.5 | |
|
| 10.6 | | Sale Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc., T3 Tower 1 LLC and T3 Tower 2 LLC. | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.6 | |
|
| 10.7 | | First Amendment to Sale Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc., T3 Tower 1 LLC and T3 Tower 2 LLC. | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.7 | |
|
| 10.8 | | Management Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Property Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA Tower LLC, T-Mobile West Tower LLC, CCTMO LLC, T3 Tower 1 LLC and T3 Tower 2 LLC. | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.8 | |
|
| 10.9 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.10 | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.10 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 4.58 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 11/9/2011 | | 4.2 | | |
| 4.59 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 11/14/2012 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.60 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 11/20/2012 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.61 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 9/11/2013 | | 4.4 | | |
| 4.62 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 5/14/2018 | | 4.2 | | |
| 4.63 | | Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 1, 2020, by and among Sprint Communications, Inc., T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 4.27 | | |
| 4.64 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 9/11/2013 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.65 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 9/11/2013 | | 4.2 | | |
| 4.66 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 9/11/2013 | | 4.3 | | |
| 4.67 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 12/12/2013 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.68 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 2/24/2015 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.69 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 2/22/2018 | | 4.1 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 10.11 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 10.2 | |
|
| 10.12 | | Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2013, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., as Borrower, Deutsche Telekom AG, as Lender, the other lenders party thereto from time to time, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 4.14 | |
|
| 10.13 | | Amendment No. 1, dated as of November 15, 2013, to the Credit Agreement, dated May 1, 2013, among T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., each of the Subsidiaries signatory thereto, Deutsche Telekom AG and the other lenders party thereto from time to time, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. | | 8-K | | 11/20/2013 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.14 | | Amendment No. 2, dated as of September 3, 2014, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2013, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., Deutsche Telekom AG and the other lenders party thereto from time to time, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. | | 8-K | | 9/5/2014 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.15 | | Amendment No. 3, dated as of November 2, 2015, to the Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2013, among T-Mobile USA, Inc., Deutsche Telekom AG and the other lenders party thereto from time to time, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., as Administrative Agent. | | 8-K | | 11/5/2015 | | 10.2 | |
|
| 10.16 | | | | 8-K | | 3/22/2013 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.17 | | | | 8-K | | 8/22/2013 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.18 | | | | 8-K | | 1/6/2014 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.19 | | | | 8-K | | 1/6/2014 | | 10.2 | |
|
| 10.20 | | | | 10-K | | 2/14/2017 | | 10.29 | |
|
| 10.21 | | | | 8-K | | 3/4/2014 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.22 | | Joinder and First Amendment to the Receivables Sale and Conveyancing Agreement, dated as of November 28, 2014, among Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Triton PCS Holdings Company L.L.C., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC and T-Mobile South LLC, as sellers, and T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as purchaser. | | 10-K | | 2/19/2015 | | 10.55 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 4.70 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 5/14/2018 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.71 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 2/3/2020 | | 4.2 | | |
| 4.72 | | Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 1, 2020, by and among Sprint Corporation, Sprint Communications, Inc., T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 4.36 | | |
| 4.73 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 11/2/2016 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.74 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 3/12/2018 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.75 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 6/6/2018 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.76 | | | | 10-Q (SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 1/31/2019 | | 4.1 | | |
| 4.77 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 11/2/2016 | | 4.2 | | |
| 4.78 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 3/21/2018 | | 10.2 | | |
| 4.79 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 3/21/2018 | | 10.1 | | |
| 4.80 | | | | 13D | | 4/2/2020 | | 6 | | |
| 4.81 | | | | 13D/A | | 6/24/2020 | | 49 | | |
| 4.82 | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 10.1 | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.1 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 10.23 | | Joinder and Second Amendment to the Receivables Sale and Conveyancing Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2015, among SunCom Wireless Operating Company, LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Triton PCS Holdings Company L.L.C., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC and T-Mobile South LLC, as sellers, and T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as purchaser. | | 10-Q | | 4/28/2015 | | 10.5 | |
|
| 10.24 | | | | 8-K | | 3/4/2014 | | 10.2 | |
|
| 10.25 | | | | 10-K | | 2/19/2015 | | 10.56 | |
|
| 10.26 | | | | 10-Q | | 4/28/2015 | | 10.6 | |
|
| 10.27 | | | | 10-K | | 2/14/2017 | | 10.33 | |
|
| 10.28 | | | | 10-Q | | 7/20/2017 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.29 | | Second Amended and Restated Master Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2016, among T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as funding seller, Billing Gate One LLC, as purchaser, Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale, as bank purchasing agent, The Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as bank collection agent, T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as servicer, and T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor. | | 8-K | | 12/6/2016 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.30 | | First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Master Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 5, 2017, among T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as funding seller, Billing Gate One LLC, as purchaser, Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale, as bank purchasing agent, The Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as bank collection agent, T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as servicer, and T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor. | | 10-Q | | 7/20/2017 | | 10.2 | |
|
| 10.31 | | Third Amended and Restated Master Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2018, among T-Mobile Airtime Funding LLC, as funding seller, Billing Gate One LLC, as purchaser, Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale, as bank purchasing agent, The Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as bank collection agent, TMobile PCS Holdings LLC, as servicer, and T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor. | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 10.32 | | | | 8-K | | 11/12/2015 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.33 | | | | 10-Q | | 4/24/2017 | | 10.3 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 10.2 | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.2 | | |
| 10.3 | | | | 10-K | | 2/7/2019 | | 10.3 | | |
| 10.4 | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.3 | | |
| 10.5 | | MPL Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc. and CCTMO LLC. | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.4 | | |
| 10.6 | | First Amendment, dated as of November 30, 2012, to MPL Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc. and CCTMO LLC. | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.5 | | |
| 10.7 | | Second Amendment, dated as of October 31, 2014, to MPL Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc.
| | 10-K | | 2/7/2019 | | 10.7 | | |
| 10.8 | | Sale Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc., T3 Tower 1 LLC and T3 Tower 2 LLC. | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.6 | | |
| 10.9 | | First Amendment, dated as of November 30, 2012, to Sale Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc., T3 Tower 1 LLC and T3 Tower 2 LLC. | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.7 | | |
| 10.10 | | Second Amendment, dated as of October 31, 2014, to Sale Site Master Lease Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA, Inc., T3 Tower 1 LLC and T3 Tower 2 LLC. | | 10-K | | 2/7/2019 | | 10.10 | | |
| 10.11 | | | | 10-K | | 2/7/2019 | | 10.11 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 10.34 | | | | 10-Q | | 4/24/2017 | | 10.4 | |
|
| 10.35 | | | | 10-Q | | 4/24/2017 | | 10.5 | |
|
| 10.36 | | | | 8-K | | 7/27/2017 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.37 | | First Incremental Facility Amendment, dated as of December 29, 2016, to the Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2015, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties thereto as lenders, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent. | | 8-K | | 12/30/2016 | | 10.3 | |
|
| 10.38 | | Second Incremental Facility Amendment, dated as of January 25, 2017, to the Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2015, as amended by that certain First Incremental Facility Amendment dated as of December 29, 2016, by and among T-Mobile USA, Inc., the several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties thereto as lenders, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as administrative agent. | | 8-K | | 1/25/2017 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.39 | | | | 8-K | | 6/8/2016 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.40 | | | | 10-K | | 2/14/2017 | | 10.41 | |
|
| 10.41 | | | | 10-Q | | 10/23/2017 | | 10.2 | |
|
| 10.42 | | Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2016, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto from time to time. | | 8-K | | 6/8/2016 | | 10.2 | |
|
| 10.43 | | First Amendment, dated as of July 27, 2016, to the Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2016, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto. | | 10-Q | | 10/24/2016 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.44 | | Second Amendment, dated as of October 31, 2016, to the Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2016, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto. | | 10-K | | 2/14/2017 | | 10.46 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 10.12 | | Management Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2012, by and among Suncom Wireless Operating Company, L.L.C., Cook Inlet/VS GSM IV PCS Holdings, LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile South LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Voicestream Pittsburgh, L.P., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC, Wireless Alliance, LLC, Suncom Wireless Property Company, L.L.C., T-Mobile USA Tower LLC, T-Mobile West Tower LLC, CCTMO LLC, T3 Tower 1 LLC and T3 Tower 2 LLC. | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.8 | | |
| 10.13 | | | | S-3ASR | | 6/22/2020 | | 4.2 | | |
| 10.14 | | Support Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2018, by and among SoftBank Group Corp., SoftBank Group Capital Limited, Starburst I, Inc., Galaxy Investment Holdings, Inc., T-Mobile US, Inc., and Deutsche Telekom AG. | | 8-K | | 04/30/2018 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.15 | | | | 8-K | | 04/30/2018 | | 10.3 | | |
| 10.16 | | | | 8-K | | 2/20/2020 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.17 | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 10.2 | | |
| 10.18 | | | | 10-Q | | 7/26/2019 | | 10.5 | | |
| 10.19 | | | | 8-K | | 4/1/2020 | | 10.3 | | |
| 10.20* | | | | 10-Q | | 11/5/2020 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.21* | | | | 10-Q | | 11/5/2020 | | 10.2 | | |
| 10.22 | | | | 8-K | | 3/4/2014 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.23 | | Joinder and First Amendment to the Receivables Sale and Conveyancing Agreement, dated as of November 28, 2014, among Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Triton PCS Holdings Company L.L.C., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC and T-Mobile South LLC, as sellers, and T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as purchaser. | | 10-K | | 2/19/2015 | | 10.55 | | |
| 10.24 | | Joinder and Second Amendment to the Receivables Sale and Conveyancing Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2015, among SunCom Wireless Operating Company, LLC, Powertel/Memphis, Inc., Triton PCS Holdings Company L.L.C., T-Mobile West LLC, T-Mobile Central LLC, T-Mobile Northeast LLC and T-Mobile South LLC, as sellers, and T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as purchaser. | | 10-Q | | 4/28/2015 | | 10.5 | | |
| 10.25 | | | | 8-K | | 3/4/2014 | | 10.2 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 10.45 | | Third Amendment, dated as of December 23, 2016, to the Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2016, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto. | | 10-K | | 2/14/2017 | | 10.47 | |
|
| 10.46 | | Fourth Amendment, dated as of May 18, 2017, to the Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2016, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto. | | 10-Q | | 7/20/2017 | | 10.3 | |
|
| 10.47 | | Second Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of August 21, 2017, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto | | 10-Q | | 10/23/2017 | | 10.3 | |
|
| 10.48 | | First Amendment, dated as of December 18, 2017, to the Second Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administrative Agreement, dated as of August 21, 2017, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc., as performance guarantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto. | | | | | | | | X |
| 10.49 | | | | 8-K | | 3/7/2016 | | 1.1 | |
|
| 10.50 | | | | 8-K | | 11/2/2016 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.51 | | | | 8-K | | 4/26/2016 | | 1.1 | |
|
| 10.52 | | | | 8-K | | 11/2/2016 | | 10.2 | |
|
| 10.53 | | | | 8-K | | 4/29/2016 | | 1.1 | |
|
| 10.54 | | | | 8-K | | 11/2/2016 | | 10.3 | |
|
| 10.55 | | | | 8-K | | 3/16/2017 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.56 | | | | 8-K | | 12/30/2016 | | 10.1 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 10.26 | | | | 10-K | | 2/19/2015 | | 10.56 | | |
| 10.27 | | | | 10-Q | | 4/28/2015 | | 10.6 | | |
| 10.28 | | | | 10-K | | 2/14/2017 | | 10.33 | | |
| 10.29 | | | | 10-Q | | 7/20/2017 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.30 | | Fourth Amended and Restated Master Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2019, among T-Mobile Funding LLC, as funding seller, Billing Gate One LLC, as purchaser, Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Giroznetrale, as bank purchasing agent, MUFG Bank (Europe) N.V., Germany Branch, as bank collection agent, T-Mobile PCS Holdings LLC, as servicer, and T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc., as performance guarantors. | | 8-K | | 3/4/2019 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.31 | |
| | 10-Q | | 10/30/2018 | | 10.2 | | |
| 10.32 | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 10.33 | | Third Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2018, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc., jointly and severally as performance guarantors, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto. | | 10-Q | | 10/30/2018 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.34 | | First Amendment, dated as of December 21, 2018, to Third Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2018, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc., jointly and severally as performance guarantors, Royal Bank of Canada, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto. | | 10-K | | 2/7/2019 | | 10.45 | | |
| 10.35 | | Second Amendment, dated as of February 14, 2020, to Third Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2018, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc., jointly and severally as guarantors, Royal Bank of Canada, as Administrative Agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto. | | 10-Q | | 5/6/2020 | | 10.1 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 10.57 | | | | 8-K | | 12/30/2016 | | 10.2 | |
|
| 10.58 | | | | 8-K | | 1/25/2018 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.59* | | | | S-1/A | | 2/27/2007 | | 10.1(a) | |
|
| 10.60* | | | | Schedule 14A | | 4/19/2010 | | Annex A | |
|
| 10.61* | | | | 10-Q | | 8/9/2010 | | 10.2 | |
|
| 10.62* | | | | 10-Q | | 10/30/2012 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.63* | | | | 10-K | | 3/1/2013 | | 10.9(a) | |
|
| 10.64* | | | | 10-K | | 3/1/2013 | | 10.9(b) | |
|
| 10.65* | | | | 10-Q | | 8/9/2010 | | 10.5 | |
|
| 10.66* | | | | 10-K | | 2/29/2012 | | 10.12 | |
|
| 10.67* | | | | 10-K | | 3/1/2013 | | 10.12(b) | |
|
| 10.68* | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 10.3 | |
|
| 10.69* | | | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 10.70* | | | | 8-K | | 5/2/2013 | | 10.4 | |
|
| 10.71* | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.17 | |
|
| 10.72* | | | | 10-K | | 2/25/2014 | | 10.35 | |
|
| 10.73* | | | | 8-K | | 2/26/2015 | | 10.1 | |
|
| 10.74* | | | | 10-Q | | 4/24/2017 | | 10.7 | |
|
| 10.75* | | | | 10-Q | | 4/24/2017 | | 10.6 | |
|
| 10.76* | | | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 10.77* | | | | 10-K | | 2/25/2014 | | 10.39 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 10.36 | | Third Amendment, dated as of April 30, 2020, to Third Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2018, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc., jointly and severally as guarantors, Royal Bank of Canada, as Administrative Agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto. | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 10.15 | | |
| 10.37 | | Fourth Amendment, dated as of November 2, 2020, to Third Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase and Administration Agreement, dated as of October 23, 2018, by and among T-Mobile Handset Funding LLC, as transferor, T-Mobile Financial LLC, as servicer, T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc., jointly and severally as guarantors, Royal Bank of Canada, as Administrative Agent, and certain financial institutions party thereto. | | | | | | | | X |
| 10.38 | | | | 8-K | | 3/16/2017 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.39 | | | | 8-K | | 1/25/2018 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.40 | | | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 10.3 | | |
| 10.41 | | | | 8-K | | 9/17/2020 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.42 | | | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 10.4 | | |
| 10.43 | | | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 10.7 | | |
| 10.44 | | Collateral Trust and Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2020, by and among T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., the other grantors party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as first priority agent, the holder representatives party thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as collateral trustee. | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 10.8 | | |
| 10.45 | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 10.46 | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 10.47 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 11/2/2016 | | 10.1 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 10.48 | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 11/2/2016 | | 10.2 | | |
| 10.49 | | First Amendment to Intra-Company Spectrum Lease Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2018, among Sprint Spectrum License Holder, LLC, Sprint Spectrum License Holder II LLC and Sprint Spectrum License Holder III LLC, Sprint Communications, Inc., Sprint Intermediate HoldCo LLC, Sprint Intermediate HoldCo II LLC, Sprint Intermediate HoldCo III LLC. | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 3/12/2018 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.50 | | Second Amendment to Intra-Company Spectrum Lease Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2018, among Sprint Spectrum License Holder, LLC, Sprint Spectrum License Holder II LLC and Sprint Spectrum License Holder III LLC, Sprint Communications, Inc., Sprint Intermediate HoldCo LLC, Sprint Intermediate HoldCo II LLC, Sprint Intermediate HoldCo III LLC, Sprint Corporation and the subsidiary guarantors. | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 6/6/2018 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.51 | | | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 10.13 | | |
| 10.52 | | | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 10.14 | | |
| 10.53 | | Master Framework Agreement, dated as of June 22, 2020, by and among SoftBank Group Corp., SoftBank Group Capital Ltd, Delaware Project 4 L.L.C., Delaware Project 6 L.L.C., Claure Mobile LLC, Deutsche Telekom AG, T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile Agent LLC. | | 8-K | | 6/26/2020 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.54 | | | | 8-K | | 6/26/2020 | | 10.2 | | |
| 10.55 | | | | 13D/A | | 6/25/2020 | | 15 | | |
| 10.56** | | | | S-1/A | | 2/27/2007 | | 10.1(a) | | |
| 10.57** | | | | Schedule 14A | | 4/19/2010 | | Annex A | | |
| 10.62** | | | | 10-K | | 2/9/2020 | | 10.61 | | |
| 10.63** | | | | 10-Q | | 5/6/2020 | | 10.6 | | |
| 10.64** | | | | 10-K | | 2/6/2020 | | 10.65 | | |
| 10.65** | | | | 10-Q | | 5/6/2020 | | 10.4 | | |
| 10.66** | | | | 10-Q | | 5/1/2018 | | 10.9 | | |
| 10.67** | | | | 10-K | | 2/8/2018 | | 10.76 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
10.78*10.68** | | | | 10-K | | 2/25/2014 | | 10.39 | | |
| 10.69** | |
| | 10-K | | 2/7/2019 | | 10.75 | | |
| 10.70** | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 10.71** | | | | 8-K | | 10/25/2013 | | 10.1 | |
|
10.79*10.72** | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.20 | |
|
10.80*10.73** | | | | Schedule 14A | | 4/26/2018 | | Annex A | | |
| 10.74** | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/2013 | | 10.21 | |
|
10.81*10.75** | | | | 10-K | | 2/25/20146/2020 | | 10.4510.74 | |
|
10.82*10.76** | | | | S-8 | | 2/19/2015 | | 99.1 | | |
| 10.77** | | | | 8-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 9/20/2013 | | 10.2 | | |
| 10.78** | | | | 10-Q
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 2/6/2017 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.79** | | | | 10-Q
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 8/8/2014 | | 10.12 | | |
| 10.80** | | | | 10-Q
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 8/3/2017 | | 10.3 | | |
| 10.81** | | | | 8-K10-Q/A | | 6/4/20138/10/2020 | | 10.210.25 | |
|
10.83*10.82** | | | | 10-Q/A | | 8/10/2020 | | 10.26 | | |
| 10.83** | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/20135/6/2020 | | 10.2410.7 | |
|
| 10.84** | | | | 10-Q | | 8/8/20135/6/2020 | | 10.2510.8 | |
|
| 10.85** | | | | 10-K | | 2/19/2015 | | 10.43 | |
|
10.86* | | | | 10-K | | 2/19/2015 | | 10.44 | |
|
10.87* | | | | S-8 | | 2/19/2015 | | 99.1 | |
|
10.88* | | Amended Director Compensation Program effective as of May 1, 2013 (amended June 4, 2014 and further amended on June 1, 2015, June 16, 2016, June 13, 2017, June 13, 2019 and June 13, 2017)4, 2020). | | 10-Q10-Q/A | | 7/20/20178/10/2020 | | 10.410.30 | |
|
12.110.86** | | | |
8-K | |
6/4/2013 | |
10.2 | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
21.1 | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date of First Filing | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herein |
| 10.87** | | | | 10-K
(SEC File No. 001-04721) | | 2/27/2009 | | 10.9 | | |
| 21.1 | | | |
| |
| |
| | X |
23.122.1 | | | | | | | | | | X |
| 23.1 | | | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 24.1 | | Power of Attorney, pursuant to which amendments to this Form 10-K may be filed (included on the signature page contained in Part IV of the Form 10-K). | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 31.1 | | | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 31.2 | | | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 32.1*** | | | |
| |
| |
| |
X |
| 32.2*** | | | |
| |
| |
| |
X |
| 101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document.Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | |
| |
| |
| | X |
| 104 | | Cover Page Interactive Data File (the cover page XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document).
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| * | | Certain confidential information contained in this exhibit has been omitted because it is both (i) not material and (ii) would likely cause competitive harm if publicly disclosed. |
| ** | | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
| *** | | Furnished herein. |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | T-MOBILE US, INC. | |
| | | |
| February 23, 2021 | | T-MOBILE US, INC./s/ G. Michael Sievert | |
| | | |
February 7, 2018 | | /s/ John J. Legere | |
| | John J. Legere
President and G. Michael Sievert
Chief Executive Officer
| |
Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints John J. LegereG. Michael Sievert and J. Braxton Carter,Peter Osvaldik, and each or eitherany of them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each acting alone, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments or supplements (including post-effective amendments) to this Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated as of February 7, 2018.23, 2021.
| | | | | | | | |
| Signature | | Title |
| | |
| /s/ G. Michael Sievert | | Chief Executive Officer and |
| G. Michael Sievert | | Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Signature | | Title |
| | |
/s/ John J. LegerePeter Osvaldik | | Executive Vice President and Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer and |
John J. LegerePeter Osvaldik | | Director (Principal Executive(Principal Financial Officer) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| /s/ Dara Bazzano | | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting |
/s/ J. Braxton CarterDara Bazzano | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
J. Braxton Carter | | (Principal Financial (Principal Accounting Officer) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| /s/ Timotheus Höttges | | Chairman of the Board |
/s/ Peter OsvaldikTimotheus Höttges | | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting |
Peter Osvaldik | | Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| /s/ Marcelo Claure | | Director |
/s/ Timotheus HöttgesMarcelo Claure | | Chairman of the Board |
Timotheus Höttges | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| /s/ Srikant M. Datar | | Director |
/s/ W. Michael BarnesSrikant M. Datar | | Director |
W. Michael Barnes | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| /s/ Lawrence H. Guffey | | Director |
/s/ Thomas DannenfeldtLawrence H. Guffey | | Director |
Thomas Dannenfeldt | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| /s/ Christian P. Illek | | Director |
/s/ Srikant DatarChristian P. Illek | | Director |
Srikant Datar | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| /s/ Stephen R. Kappes | | Director |
/s/ Lawrence H. GuffeyStephen R. Kappes | | Director |
Lawrence H. Guffey | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | |
/s/ Bruno JacobfeuerbornRaphael Kübler | | Director |
Bruno JacobfeuerbornRaphael Kübler | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| /s/ Thorsten Langheim | | Director |
/s/ Raphael KüblerThorsten Langheim | | Director |
Raphael Kübler | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| /s/ Dominique Leroy | | Director |
/s/ Thorsten LangheimDominique Leroy | | Director |
Thorsten Langheim | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| /s/ Teresa A. Taylor | | Director |
| Teresa A. Taylor | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| /s/ Omar Tazi | | Director |
| Omar Tazi | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| /s/ Kelvin R. Westbrook | | Director |
| Kelvin R. Westbrook | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| /s/ Michael Wilkens | | Director |
| Michael Wilkens | | |
